The URL can be used to link to this page

4 Request for Prelim Plat, Chanhassen East Business Center Phase II P.c. DATE: 4-1-98 Lf I CITY OF CHANHASSEN - c.c. DATE: 4-27-98 CASE: 95-18 Site Plan 95-18 SUB, 95-4 V AC BY: AI-Jaff:v f- Z c:t l> :J 1.. 1- =::( ::( - ~ 1.1 - - f) STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: 1) Site Plan Review for the construction of two office buildings with an area of 12,727 square feet and 15,005 square feet 2) Preliminary Plat to Subdivide 3.46 acres into 2 Lots, Chanhassen East Business Center Third Addition LOCATION: South of Highway 5, West of Dell Road, and North of Lake Drive East. APPLICANT: CSM Investors, Inc. 2575 University Ave. W. Suite 150 St. Paul, MN 55114-1024 646-1717 PRESENT ZONING: lOP, Industrial Office Park ACREAGE: 3.46 acres ADJACENT ZONING ;,AND LAND USE: N - Highway 5 S - Lake Drive East and Data Serve E - CSM Phase II W - AbralHighway Business SEWER AND WATER: Services are available to the site. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is an old farmstead. The majority of the site has been disturbed by grading activities relating to' CSM Phase I and II . 2000 LAND USE: Office/Industrial C In .' In co .r:::. C. co I .r:::. __--~u.., -- - . 7300 2 7400 7500 7600 7700 .ve E ,~anbassen . Bstates Mini park i Bi _~ 7900 ~! 7800 8000 8100 <' , 8200 3 8300 8400 CI) 0': Oco ... 0- C CI) "'C W - o > 01: 8500 8600 8700 8800 CSM Corporation Phase III April 27, 1998 Page 2 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY There are two actions being requested with this application, a subdivision and a site plan review for two office buildings. The site is zoned lOP, Industrial Office Park and bordered by Highway 5 to the north, CSM Phase II office warehouse buildings, and Lake Drive East to the south. The lot area of the office/warehouse sites are 1.82 acres for the easterly lot (Lot I) and 1.64 acres for the westerly lot (Lot 2). The site is visible directly from Highway 5 and has full access from Lake Drive East. The subdivision request consists of subdividing 3.46 acres into two lots. Lots I and 2 will contain the proposed office buildings. The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action. The site plan is for the two office warehouse buildings. The buildings (referred to as Buildings A and B) are well designed. Though similar in design and materials, they vary in color and overall facade design. Both buildings are proposed to utilize shades of face brick on all four sides. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff pointed out that the shades of brick used on the two new buildings might not give the level of contrast desired and that the applicant should investigate other options. At the time of writing this update, we had not seen the different alternatives. Decorative pre-colored rockface block will be integrated into the walls, accented by pre-colored masonry bands. A pitched roof element is proposed above each building. This is the identical element found on buildings Phase I, II, and III. Staff addressed this issue with the applicant and was informed that other alternatives will be investigated such as creating a more pronounced entrance with a pitched element. This could result in a better design alternative. The applicant submitted a revised drawing that reflects a triangular canopy at each entrance. It has a modern look and is an acceptable alternative. The Planning Commission asked the applicant to investigate other colors for the canopy. The applicant is proposing to use the same color teal currently used on CSM phase I and II. At the time ofv.riting this report, 'Ne had not seen final design dFawings on the eanopy, ho\ve'.'er, the applieant will be presenting re'.'ised plans at the meeting. The buildings are office buildings with no proposed loading dock. Parking is proposed along the east west and south of the proposed buildings. These spaces are screened by a 3 to 4 foot height berm. Highway 5 has an elevation of936 along the west end of the site and slopes down as it continues east bound. The westerly portion of the 10..... will Rot "....viEl. nEloljHato sere-::;.nf ::. the parking lot along Highv.'ay 5. 8taffreeommeIuls the berm ee inereased a miniRTl::lm t in height along the north'.vest eorner of the site. Staff had indicated concern in some areas where the berm needed to be increased in height. The applicant has revised the grading plan and increased the height of the berm to provide adequate screening of the parking lot. CSM Corporation Phase ill April 27, 1998 Page 3 Plantings are being used in strategic locations along the berm and highway to maximize screening of the parking lot, however, until these trees mature, the parking lot will be visible. This area is in the highway corridor which uses the underlying district for setbacks. The parking as proposed including the screening meets the Highway 5 zoning district requirements once the height of the berm is increased. These buildings will require 125 parking spaces. The spaces were designed surrounding the buildings. They are broken by landscape islands and screened from views from Highway 5 and Lake Drive East by berms and vegetation. There is a maximum of two rows of parking at any given location. The site landscaping is generally of high quality, however, speeies seleetion differs frem the origiBal P~a': == :~ for the first three C~ ,~!~;~t :: e=:;= reduced. ' . i: e;:;~;~ the phases, repetition Elf some of the boulevard plantings along Lake Drive eouId be aone. Staff recommends the applicant use the planting schedule from the approved landscape of previous phases to select some species to repeat in current plan. Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. The overall design is sensitive to the Highway 5 corridor's image. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan, without variances, and the subdivision request, with conditions outlined in the staff report. BACKGROUND On September 9, 1996, the City Council approved Site Plan Review #95-18 for CSM Phase II to construct 2 office warehouse buildings. The proposal also included approval of Subdivision #95- 18 which divided 7.65 acres into 2 lots. Lot 1 contains a building while Lot 2 is vacant. The applicant wishes to divide Lot 2 into two lots and build two smaller office buildings rather than one large office warehouse building, which is the proposal before you. As a condition of site plan approval, the applicant will be required to officially withdraw his site plan approval for Building 2 of Phase II for Chanhassen East Business Center 2nd Addition. GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE The proposed office buildings, with an area of 12,727 square feet and 15,005 square feet, will be situated parallel to and south of Highway 5. The site is bordered by Highway 5 to the north, and Lake Drive East to the south. Access to the buildings is proposed from Lake Drive East. Parking will be located along the east, west and south sides of the buildings. A meandering berm with landscaping, 2 to 4 feet in height, is proposed to be installed along the perimeter of the site to provide screening. This berm must be inereasea in height tEl a minimlHR Elf 4 feet tEl ma-ximize screeniag of the parkiag lot from Highwa-y 5. As mentioned in the summery section, the CSM Corporation Phase III April 27, 1998 Page 4 grading plan has been revised to increase the height of the berm and provide the proper screening. The buildings are located 30 feet from the north, 110 feet from the east, 68 feet from the south, and 115 feet from the west property line. Materials used on the both buildings are face brick on all four sides of both buildings. Decorative pre-colored rockface block will be integrated into the walls, accented by pre-colored masonry bands. A pre-colored pitched roof element is proposed on each building, which is identical to that found on the CSM buildings Phase I and II. The applicant is proposing to change the color of face brick of the two new buildings by using two new colors. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff pointed out that the shades of brick used on the two new buildings might not give the level of contrast desired and that the applicant should investigate other options. At the time of writing this update, we had not seen the different alternatives. The design should be taken a step farther with a different pitched element that is compatible with the first two phases, yet have its own character. The applicant suggested a pitched element over the entrances into the buildings. This could be a reasonable solution, however, at the time of writing this report, revised plans were not available. The applicant submitted a revised drawing that reflects a triangular canopy at each entrance. It has a modern look and is an acceptable alternative. The Planning Commission asked the applicant to investigate other colors for the canopy. The applicant is proposing to use the same color teal currently used on CSM phase I and II. Revised arehiteernral elevations v,'ill be presented at the Planning Commission meeting. The building's architecture is tastefully designed and meets the standards of the site plan ordinance requirements. The different colors and materials give the building the desired visual appeal. As mentioned earlier, two new colors are being introduced to break up the continues wall created by the first two phases, however, staff is recommending more contrast between the two colors. This development falls within the Highway Corridor Overlay and must comply with the district's design standards in addition to the Industrial Office Park Standards. The purpose of the overlay district is to promote high-quality architectural and site design through improved development standards within the corridor. The design standards should create a unified, harmonious and high quality visual environment. The plan and design of the proposed development meets the intent of the overlay district with the following features: · The buildings will be one story and the architectural style is unique to the building but will fit in. The buildings will provide a variation in style through the use of brick, block, glass, and pitched roof elements. The buildings are utilizing exterior materials that are durable and of high quality. Samples of the materials will be available at the meeting. CSM Corporation Phase ill April 27, 1998 Page 5 . The site slopes easterly and grading of the site is required. The landscaping plan provides a variety of plant materials that are massed where possible, particularly along Highway 5. The berms and landscaping materials will be continuous along the perimeter of the site. The plant materials are repetitious in some locations and variable in others. Proposed plant materials are indigenous to Minnesota. A curb is required along the perimeter of the green space area. All planting areas are adequate in size to allow trees to grow. The berm along Highway 5 will need to be increased in height. . A parking lot light plan is required. The plan should incorporate the light style and height. A detailed sign plan which include the lighting method has not been submitted. However, the same sign criteria that governs CSM Phases I and II will be applied to Phase III. Facade signage will be raised backlit letters, within a consistent band above the face brick entries. All signage will be uniform color with letters at maximum of 2 feet and logos at a maximum of 30 inches. . The site plan shows a trash enclosure located between the two sites. The materials are similar to those used on the exterior of the building. Shrubs are proposed along the south side of the trash enclosure. This treatment must be repeated along the north portion of the trash enclosure. Current state statutes require that recycling space be provided for all new buildings. The area of the recycling space must be dedicated at the rate specified in Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) 1300.4700 Subp. 5. The applicant should demonstrate the required area will be provided in addition to the space required for other solid waste collection space. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; CSM Corporation Phase ill April 27, 1998 Page 6 (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the City's Highway 5 corridor design requirements, the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, and the site plan review requirements. The site design is compatible with the surrounding development. It is functional and harmonious with the approved development for this area. WETLANDS A wetland delineation report was prepared by John Anderson with wetlands data as part of the first phase of this project. The applicant has indicated on the plan sheet that no wetlands exist on this site. These findings have been reviewed and confirmed by both city staff and a Technical Evaluation Panel. CSM Corporation Phase ill April 27, 1998 Page 7 GRADING AND DRAINAGE Overall, the site has been rough graded. The City approved a grading pennit last year. The grading plan proposes minimal grading in order to prepare the site for the building and parking lot facilities. Landscaped benns are proposed along Trunk Highway 5 and Lake Drive East. The site is designed to drain via stonn sewer to the southeast where the stonn water will discharge into the existing stonn drainage system in Lake Drive East. As a part of Phase I, the applicant constructed a regional stonn water pond on the southwest comer of Lake Drive East and Dell Road. The stonn water from this development will be conveyed via stonn water pipes in Lake Drive East to the regional pond for pretreatment prior to discharging into Eden Prairie. Stonn drainage calculations for the stonn sewer have already been submitted to the City with the previous plat. EROSION CONTROL Erosion control measures and site restoration are proposed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). The grading plan incorporates erosion control fence (Type I) around the perimeter of the grading limits. Most of the erosion control fence has already been installed. Rock construction entrances are proposed at the access points. Erosion control measures shall be maintained until the parking lot areas have been paved with a bituminous surface and the site restored with sod, seed and landscaping. Hay bales and/or rock dikes are proposed to be installed around all catch basins and shall be maintained until the parking lots have been paved. UTILITIES Individual sewer and water services will be extended through the lots from Lake Drive East. A cross access agreement will need to be prepared to extend utility service to the west lot from the east lot. All utilities installed outside the City's drainage and utility easements or right-of-way shall be considered private and not maintained by the City. These utilities will be inspected by the City's Building Department. The applicant and/or contractor shall be responsible for obtaining the appropriate pennits from the City's Building Department. The final construction plans shall be prepared in accordance with the City of Chanhassen's latest edition of Standard Specifications' and Detail Plates and/or state plumbing codes. Since this development is not installing any public improvements it is not necessary for the applicant to enter into a development contract with the City; however, staff does recommend that a site plan agreement be prepared. CSM Corporation Phase ill April 27, 1998 Page 8 STREETS/PARKING/INTERIOR CIRCULATION The site is proposed to be accessed from two driveway access points off Lake Drive East. The easterly access drive is proposed to be shared with the site to the east (Phase I). A cross-access and maintenance agreement will need to be recorded against the parcel. In conjunction with Phase I of this development, a traffic study was prepared for the intersection of Lake Drive East and Dell Road. The traffic study revealed acceptable levels of service through Phase I of the development and eventually a level of service "B" for the forecast year 2005, assuming a signalized intersection. Based on the traffic study, it appears a traffic signal may be required in the future at Lake Drive East and Dell Road. The developer shall be responsible for a share of the local cost participation of this traffic signal on a percentage basis based upon traffic generation from full development of this site in relation to the total traffic volume of Dell Road. A condition will be placed in the site plan permit accordingly. A 6-foot wide concrete sidewalk exists along the north side of Lake Drive East. In conjunction with the proposed driveway curb cuts, pedestrian ramps will need to be constructed at all access points. The driveway access points along Lake Drive East shall be constructed in accordance with the City's Industrial Driveway Detail Plate No. 5207. The City's parking ordinance for office warehouse buildings requires a total of 125 spaces for both buildings combined. The applicant is providing 129 spaces. The Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) requires that accessible parking spaces be provided at the rate of one accessible space per every 25 spaces in the lot(s). This calculates out to 5 spaces. The submitted site plan includes eight accessible parking spaces. MISCELLANEOUS The preliminary plat proposes replatting a portion of Phase II. The final plat name shall be changed to Chanhassen East Business Center 3rd Addition (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1). There is an existing site plan agreement that needs to be amended to relate to this proposal. LANDSCAPING The landscaping plan submitted by the applicant is providing a total of 104 trees; 29 overs tory, 46 ornamental, and 29 evergreen trees. Species selection differs from the original planting schedule used for the first three CSM buildings in that the variety has been reduced. To have continuity between the phases, repetition of some of the boulevard plantings along Lake Drive could be done. Staff recommends the applicant use the planting schedule from the approved landscape plan from previous phases to select some species to repeat in current plan. CSM Corporation Phase ill April 27, 1998 Page 9 The applicant meets the minimum requirements for parking and buffer yard landscaping. However, buffer yard landscaping along Hwy. 5 requires the use of shrubs and the applicant has not proposed any in that area. In reviewing the landscape plan for CSM 1-3, staff noted that shrubs were not used there either. Berms were installed as a means of screening the parking and are also being used in this development as well. Visibility from Highway 5 into the parking lots of the first phases is still an issue, and therefore staff recommends shrubs be added to the landscaping along the highway. To their credit, applicant has used evergreens in strategic locations to avoid direct views of any parking areas. Parking lot island widths appear to be less than the minimum 10' required by ordinance. Staff recommends all islands be revised to measure a minimum of 10' in width or aeration tubes must be installed. REFUSE COLLECTION The site plan shows a trash enclosure located between the two sites. The materials are similar to those used on the exterior of the building. Shrubs are proposed along the south side of the trash enclosure. This treatment must be repeated along the north portion of the trash enclosure. Current state statutes require that recycling space be provided for all new buildings. The area of the recycling space must be dedicated at the rate specified in Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) 1300.4700 Subp. 5. The applicant should demonstrate the required area will be provided in addition to the space required for other solid waste collection space. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. LIGHTING Lighting locations for the parking lot are illustrated on the plans. Only shielded fixtures are allowed and the applicant shall demonstrate that there is no more than Y2 foot candles of light at the property line as required by ordinance. A detailed lighting plan should be submitted when building permits are requested. Accent lights are located above entry ways into the buildings. Street lights consistent with Lake Drive East will be at 200 feet intervals, staggered from one side to the other. SIGNAGE The applicant has Bet submitted a signage plan. One ground low profile business sign is permitted per lot. The area of the sign may not exceed 80 square feet and a height of 8 feet. Also, one wall mounted sign per business shall be permitted per street frontage. The total display area shall not exceed 15% ofthe total area of the building wall upon which the signs are CSM Corporation Phase III April 27, 1998 Page 10 mounted. No sign may exceed 90 square feet. Staffis recommending the same criteria be followed as Phases I and II. Sign Criteria: I. All businesses within a single building shall share one monument sign. One monument sign per lot. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more that 2 street frontages. The letters shall be located within a designated sign band. 3. All signs require a separate permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and add an architectural accent to the building. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. No illuminated signs within the development may be viewed from the residential section south and west of the site. 7. Back-lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed 2 feet and logos may not exceed 30 inches in height. 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting the signs on site. One stop sign must be posted on the driveway at the exit point of both sites. A detailed sign plan incorporating the method of lighting, acceptable to staff should be provided prior to requesting a building permit. CSM Corporation Phase ill April 27, 1998 Page 11 Building Height Building Setback Parking stalls Parking Setback Hard surface Coverage Lot Area COMPLIANCE TABLE - lOP DISTRICT Ordinance Building A Building B 2 stories 1 story 1 story N-30' E-10' N-30' E-llO' N-30' E-75' S-30' W-10' S-68' W-75' S-68' W-1l5' 81 & 57 stalls 75 stalls 54 stalls* N-25' E-25' N-45' E-NA' N-45' E-NA S-25' W-10' S-40 W-NA S-40' W-IO' 70% 63.2% 53% 1 acre 1.82 acres 1.64 acres The parking ordinance requires 4.5 parking spaces per 1000 square feet of office area. Building B is deficient 3 spaces while Building A has 6 additional spaces. These parcels will be under single ownership and parking will be shared. To ensure compliance with the ordinance, a cross parking agreement will be required and recorded against the property. * P ARK AND TRAIL DEDICATION FEES The City is requiring that park and trails fees be submitted in lieu of park land. Fees are to be paid in accordance to city ordinance. One third of the fees will be required at the time of final plat recording. SUBDIVISION The preliminary plat proposes replatting 3.46 acres (Lot 2, Block 1, Chanhassen East Business Center Second Addition) into two lots referred to as the east and west lots. The legal description shall be Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Chanhassen East Business Center 3rd Addition. The ordinance requires a minimum area of 1 acre for industrial lots. These lots will have areas of 1.82 acres and 1.64 acres, which exceeds ordinance requirements. The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action. Standard drainage and utility easements around the perimeter of all lots are illustrated on the plat. CSM Corporation Phase ill April 27, 1998 Page 12 PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE On April 1, 1998, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved this application. Some of the issues that were raised dealt with the architecture of the building. They preferred the fact that there were two smaller buildings to replace the larger structure. Though satisfied with the materials, they wanted to see other colors for the brick since the shade of the two bricks appeared to be quite similar. Also, they asked to applicant to investigate other options for an accent color. The applicant was proposing to use the same teal color found on the CSM phase I and II buildings. The height of the berm and it's effectiveness in screening the parking lot was another concern. The applicant is proposing to increase the height of the berm by 2 feet to accomplish effective screening. We believe this measure will be adequate. RECOMMENDA TION The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the following motion: I. SITE PLAN REVIEW "The City Council approves Site Plan Review #95-18 for CSM Phase III, as shown on the site plan received April 20, 1998, subject to the following conditions: 1. Planting schedule shall be revised to reflect use of some of the Lake Drive boulevard tree species used in the landscape plan for previous CSM phases. 2. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to include shrubs in buffer yard plantings along Highway 5. 3. Parking lot islands shall be a minimum of 10' in width. If the applicant does not increase the width, aeration tubes shall be installed. 4. Landscape materials used along the south of the trash enclosure shall be repeated along the north portion of the structure. 5. Signage criteria: a. Each building shall share one monument sign. One monument sign per lot. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. CSM Corporation Phase ill April 27, 1998 Page 13 b. Wall signs are permitted on no more that 2 street frontages. The letters shall be located within a designated sign band. c. All signs require a separate permit. d. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and add an architectural accent to the building. e. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. f. No illuminated signs within the development may be viewed from the residential section south and west of the site. g. Back-lit individual letter signs are permitted. h. Individual letters may not exceed 2 feet and logos may not exceed 30 inches in height. 1. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. J. The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting the signs on site. A detailed sign plan incorporating the method of lighting, acceptable to staff should be provided prior to requesting a sign permit. k. One stop sign must be posted on the driveway at the exit point of both sites. 6. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the city and provide the necessary financial securities as required for landscaping. 7. Fire Marshal conditions: a. "No parking fire lane" signs and yellow curbing shall be provided. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of signs and curbing to be painted. b. . The proposed fire hydrant between Building A and Building B must be relocated to the south. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location. c. Post Indicator Valves will be required. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location. CSM Corporation Phase ill April 27, 1998 Page 14 d. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention policy regarding premise identification. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #29-1992. (Copy Enclosed.) e. Submit radius turn dimensions to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. f. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention policy regarding fire department notes to be included on all site plans. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #04-1991. (Copy Enclosed.) g. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention policy regarding pre- fire plans. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #07- 1991. h. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/City of Chanhassen Policy regarding water service installation for commercial and industrial buildings. Pursuant to Inspection Division Water Service Installation Policy #34-1993. (Copy Enclosed.) 1. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy regarding maximum allowed size of domestic water service on a combination domestic fire supply line. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #36- 1994. J. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy regarding fire hydrant installation. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #47-1998. (Copy Enclosed.) k. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy regarding fire department witnessing flushing of underground mains which come in to the building for fire suppression systems. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #40-1995. 8. Concurrent with the building permit, a detailed lighting plan meeting city standards shall be submitted. 9. Re':ise plans to introdl:lce a differeat pitehed element on the Bl:lildings. 10. All roof top equipment must be screened in accordance with city ordinances. CSM Corporation Phase ill April 27, 1998 Page 15 11. Enter into a cross parking/access agreements. 12. The applicant shall officially withdraw the site plan for CSM Phase II Building 2. 13. Meet with the Building Official to discuss building plans. 14. The applicant shall investigate other color options for the canopy and provide more contrast between the two shades of brick used on buildings A and B." II. SUBDIVISION "The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the preliminary plat for Subdivision #95-18 for Chanhassen East Business Center Third Addition as shown on the plat received April 20, 1998, with the following conditions: 1. Park and trail dedication fees to be collected per city ordinance. 2. The name of the subdivision shall be changed to Chanhassen East Business Center Third Addition, and the lots shall be described as Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. 3. The appropriate drainage and utility easements should be dedicated on the final plat for all utilities. 4. The applicant shall dedicate a cross-access/parking easements over the two lots. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary financial security to guarantee compliance with the permit. 5. The installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Lake Drive East and Dell Road is expected in the future. The developer shall be responsible for a share of the local cost participation of this signal on a percentage basis based upon traffic generation from full development of this site in relation to the total traffic volume on Dell Road. The developer and/or property owner shall waive any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessment, including, but not limited to, hearing requirements or any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the property. 6. All areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with seed and disc-mulched or wood-fiber blanket or sod within two weeks of completion of each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook. All catch basins shall be protected with silt fence or hay bales until the parking lot is paved. CSM Corporation Phase ill April 27, 1998 Page 16 7. The appropriate front, rear and side yard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat. 8. The applicant will be responsible for all boulevard restoration or damage to existing City utilities or street improvements as a result of construction. 9. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, i.e. Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Waste Water Services, Minnesota Health Department, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Minnesota Department of Transportation and comply with their conditions of approval. 10. No berming or landscaping will be allowed within street right-of-way. 11. The final construction plans and specifications for the site utility improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates and/or state plumbing codes. 12. A cross access and maintenance agreement shall be executed over the easterly lot to permit utility extension and street access to the westerly lot. 13. All driveway access points along Lake Drive East shall be constructed in accordance with the City's Industrial Driveway Detail Plate No. 5207. A TT ACHMENTS 1. Memo from Dave Hempel, Assistant City Engineer, dated March 25, 1998. 2. Memo from Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal dated August 14, 1996. 3. Application. 4. Public hearing notice and property owners. 5. Reductions. 6 . Sign Plan. 7. Planning Commission minutes dated April 1, 1998. 8. Plans received April 20, 1998. g:\plan \sa \csm. i ii .doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 City Center Drive. PO Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 612.937.1900 General Fax 612.937.5139 Engineering Fax 612.937.9152 Public Safety Fax 612.934.2524 Web ll'u'lc.ci.chanhi/S.>eIz.IIlIZ.1IS MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmin AI-Jaff, Planner II David Hempel. Assistant City Engineer ~ FROM: DATE: March 25, 1998 SUBJ: Preliminary Plat Review of Chanhassen East Business Center 3rd Addition Land Use Review File No. 98-7 Upon review of the plans prepared by Westwood Engineering dated February 2, 1998, I offer the following comments and recommendations: GRADING AND DRAINAGE Overall, the site has been rough graded. The City approved a grading permit last year. The grading plan proposes minimal grading in order to prepare the site for the building and parking lot facilities. Landscaped berms are proposed along Trunk Highway 5 and Lake Drive East. The site is designed to drain via storm sewer to the southeast where the storm water will discharge into the existing storm drainage system in Lake Drive East. As a part of Phase I, the applicant constructed a regional storm water pond on the southwest comer of Lake Drive East and Dell Road. The storm water from this development will be conveyed via storm water pipes in Lake Drive East to the regional pond for pretreatment prior to discharging into Eden Prairie. Storm drainage calculations for the storm sewer have already been submitted to the City with the previous plat. EROSION CONTROL Erosion control measures and site restoration are proposed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). The grading plan incorporates erosion control fence (Type I) around the perimeter of the grading limits. Most of the erosion control fence has already been installed. Rock construction entrances are proposed at the access points. Erosion control measures shall be maintained until the parking lot areas have been paved with a bituminous surface and the site restored with sod, seed and landscaping. Hay bales and/or rock dikes are proposed to be installed around all catch basins and shall be maintained until the parking lots have been paved. UTILITIES Individual sewer and water services will be extended through the lots from Lake Drive East. A cross access agreement will need to be prepared to extend utility service to the west lot from the east lot. All utilities installed outside the City's drainage and utility easements or right-of- way shall be considered private and not maintained by the City. These utilities will be inspected by the City's Building Department. The applicant and/or contractor shall be The City ofCbanhassell. A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a channing downtown, thriving businesses, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and pl Sharmin AI-Jaff March 25, 1998 Page 2 responsible for obtaining the appropriate pennits from the City's Building Department. The final construction plans shall be prepared in accordance with the City of Chanhassen's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates and/or state plumbing codes. Since this development is not installing any public improvements it is not necessary for the applicant to enter into a development contract with the City; however, staff docs recommend that a site plan agreement be prepared. STREETS/P ARKING/INTERIOR CIRCULATION The site is proposed to be accessed from two driveway access points off Lake Drive East. The easterly access drive is proposed to be shared with the site to the east (Phase I). A cross- access and maintenance agreement will need to be recorded against the parcel. In conjunction with Phase I of this development, a traffic study was prepared for the intersection of Lake Drive East and Dell Road. The traffic study revealed acceptable levels of service through Phase I of the development and eventually a level of service "B" for the forecast year 2005, assuming a signalized intersection. Based on the traffic study, it appears a traffic signal may be required in the future at Lake Drive East and Dell Road. The developer shall be responsible for a share of the local cost participation of this traffic signal on a percentage basis based upon traffic generation fmm full development of this site in relation to the total traffic volume of Dell Road. A condition will be placed in the site plan pennit accordingly. A 6-foot wide concrete sidewalk exists along the north side of Lake Drive East. In conjunction with the proposed driveway curb cuts, pedestrian ranlps will need to be constructed at all access points. The driveway access points along Lake Drive East shall be constructed in accordance with the City's Industrial Driveway Detail Plate No. 5207. MISCELLANEOUS The preliminary plat proposes replatting a portion of Phase II. The final plat name shall be changed to Chanhassen East Business Center 3rd Addition (Lots I and 2, Block 1). There is an existing site plan agreement that needs to be amended to relate to this proposal. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The name of the subdivision shall be changed to Chanhassen East Business Center Third Addition (Lots I and 2, Block I). 2. All areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with seed and disc-mulched or wood-fiber blanket or sod within two weeks of completion of each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice HantllxlOk. All catch basins shall be pmtected with silt fence or hay bales until the parking lot is paved. Sharrnin AI-Jaff March 25, 1998 Page 3 3. TIle appropriate front, rear and sideyard drainage and utility casements shall be dedicated on the fmal plat. 4. The applicant will be responsible for all boulevard restoration or damage to existing City utilities or street improvements as a result of construction. 5. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, Le. Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Waste Water Services, Minnesota Health Department, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and MiIUlesota Department of Transportation and comply with their conditions of approval. 6. No bemling or landscaping will be allowed within street right-of-way. 7. The installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Lake Drive East and Dell Road is expected in the future. The developer shall be responsible for a share of the local cost participation of this signal on a percentage basis based upon traffic generation from full development of this site in relation to the total traffic volume on Dell Road. The developer and/or property owner shall waive any and all procedural and substantive objection'i to the special assessment, including, but not limited to, hearing requirements or any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the property. 8. The final construction plans and specifications for the site utility improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates an(Vor state plumbing codes. 9. A cross access and maintenance agreement shall be executed over the easterly lot to permit utility extension and street access to the westerly lot. to. All driveway access points along Lake Drive East shall be constructed in accordance with the City's Industrial Driveway Detail Plate No. 5207. jms c: Anita Benson, City Engineer g:'eng\dave'tx:'ehanhasscn east bus. clr. 3rd.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN )0 City Center Drive, PO Box 147 Cbanbassen, Minnesota 55317 Pbone 612.937.1900 General Fax 612.937.5739 Engineering Fax 612.937.9152 ?ublic Safety Fax 612.934.2524 Web ll'ww.ci.cballbassen.mn.lIJ MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmin AI-Jaff, Planner II FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal DATE: March 17, 1998 SUBJ: Preliminary Plat of Lot 2, block I, Chanhassen East Business Center 2nd Addition (3.46 acres) into two lots; site plan review of two buildings, 15005 and 12,727 square feet and vacation of an existing drainage and utility easement on property zoned lOP and located in the southwest corner of Dell Road and Highway 5, CSM Corporation, Chanhassen East Business Center Phase III. Planning Case 95-18 SUB, 95-18 SPR, 95-4 V AC. I have reviewed the site plan for the above project. In order to comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division, I have the following fire code or city ordinance/policy requirements. The site plan is based on the available information submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are submitted, the appropriate code or policy items will be addressed. 1. "No parking fire lane" signs and yellow curbing shall be provided. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of signs and curbing to be painted. 2. The proposed fire hydrant between Building A and Building B must be relocated to the south. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location. 3. Post Indicator Valves will be required. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location. 4. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention policy regarding premise identification. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #29-1992. (Copy Enclosed.) 5. Submit radius turn dimensions to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. rhe City ofChallhassen. A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Sharmin AI-Jaff March 17, 1998 Page 2 6. Comply with Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention policy regarding fire department notes to be included on all site plans. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #04-1991. (Copy Enclosed.) 7. Comply with Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention policy regarding pre-fire plans. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Policy #07-1991. 8. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/City of Chanhassen Policy regarding water service installation for commercial and industrial buildings. Pursuant to Inspection Division Water Service Installation Policy #34-1993. (Copy Enclosed.) 9. Comply with Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Policy regarding maximum allowed size of domestic water service on a combination domestic fire supply line. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Policy #36-1994. 10. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy regarding fire hydrant installation. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Policy #47-1998. (Copy Enclosed.) II. Comply with Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Policy regarding fire department witnessing flushing of underground mains which come in to the building for fire suppression systems. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Policy #40-1995. g:\safety\ml\plrev95-18 C I TV 0 F CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE · P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739 WATER SERVICE INSTALLATION POLICY FOR COMlVIERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS 1) The Inspections Division shall be responsible for issuance of permits. No permit shall be issued until approval of plans have been obtained from the following: a) Engineering Department b) Fire Marshal c) Minnesota Department of Health d) Plumbing Inspector 2) Plumbing inspectors will do all installation inspections and witness the hydrostatic and conductivity tests. Inspection and Test Requirements a) All pipe shall be inspected before being covered. Phone 937-1900, ext. 31, to schedule inspections. A 24 hour notice is required. b) Conductivity test is required. The pipe shall be subjected to a minimum 350 amp test for a period of not less than ~ minutes. c) Hydrostatic test required. All pipe shall be subjected to a hydrostatic pressure of 150 psi for 2 hours. Allowable pressure drop shall not exceed 1 PSI. d) Pipe shall not be run under buildings - NFPA 24,8-3.1. 3) Upon approval of the hydro test, the plumbing inspector shall submit a copy of the inspection report to the utility superintendent. The inspection report shall note whether the system is ready for main flush and drawing of water sample for the bug test. Inspections Division Water Service Installation Policy #34-1993 Date: 04/15/93 Revised: '+117/96 Page 1 of 2 C ITV OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY PREMISES IDENTIFICATION General Numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. Size and location of numbers shall be approved by one of the following - publi.c Safety Director, Building Official, Building Inspector, Fire Marshal. Requirements are for new constructJon and existing buildings where no address numbers are posted. ~} p~~- \~,j:l Othet' RequIrements - GeneraJ , . 1. Numbers shall be a contrasting color frOrJl~the bae~ground. 2. Numbers shall not be In script. \"::, ' 3. If a structure Is not visible from the street, addltlonaHiumbers are required at the driveway entrance. Size and location must be approved. tfj-i . . .. 4. Numbers on mall box at driveway entrance may be a minimum of 4". However, requirement #3 must stili be met. 5. Administrative authority may require addItional numbers If deemed necessary. ResJdent1aI RequIrements (2 or less dwelling unit) 1. Minimum height shall be 5 1/4". 2. Building permits will not be flnaled unless numbers are posted and approved by the Building Department. Commerclaf Requirements <.'. 1. Minimum height shall be 12". 2. Strip Malls . .. a. Multi tenant building will have mlnlmu.m h~!ght requirements of 6". b. Address numbers shall be on the ma'2. e;in,~nce and on all back doors. ....... . .~":'! ).;,!,,~"!~"': 3. If address numbers are located on a directory entry sign, additional numbers will be requIred on the buildings main entrance. ChanhassenFireDepartment Fire Prevention Policy #29-1992 Date: 06/15/92 Revised: Approved - Public sa~ty Director Page 1 of.1 t.., PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES TO BE INCLUDED ON ALL SITE PLANS 1. Fire Marshal must witness the flushing of underground sprinkler service line, per NFPA 13-8-2.1. 2. A final inspection by the Fire Marshal before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. 3. Fire Department access roads shall be provided on site during all phases of construction. The construction of these temporary roads will conform with the Chanhassen Fire Department requirements for temporary access roads at construction sites. Details are available. 4. Onsite fire hydrants shall be provided and in operating condition during all phases of construction. 5. The use of liquefied petroleum ~ shall be in conformance with NFP A Standard 58 and the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. A list of these requirements is available. (See policy #33-1993) 6. All fire detection and fire suppression systems shall be monitored by an approved UL central station with a UL 71 Certificate issued on these systems before final occupancy is issued. 7. An 11" x 14" As Built shall be provided to the Fire Department. The As Built shall be reproducible and acceptable to the Fire Marshal. (See policy #07-1991). 8. An approved lock box shall be provided on the building for fire department use. The lock box should be located by the Fire Department connection or as located by the Fire Marshal. Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #04-1991 Date: 11/22/91 Revised: 12/23/94 Page I of 2 9. High-piled combustible storage shall comply with the requirements of Article #81 of the Minnesota Uniform fu Code. High-piled combustible storage is combustible materials on closely packed piles more than 15' in height or combustible materials on pallets or in racks more than 12' in height For certain special-hazard commodities such as rubber tires, plastics, some flammable liquids, idle pallets, etc. the critical pile height may be as low as 6 feet. 10. Fire lane signage shall be provided as required by the Fire Marshal. (See policy #06-1991). 11. Smoke detectors installed in lieu of 1 hour rated corridors under UBC section 33050, Exception #5 shall comply with Chanhassen Fire Department requirements for installation and system type. (See policy #05-1991). 12. Maximum allowed size of domestic water service on a combination domestic/fire sprinkler supply ~ine policy must be followed. (See policy #36-1994). J o.~ ~~ ',~ - Approved - Public Safety Director Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #04-1991 Date: 11/22/91 Revised: 12/23/94 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY REGARDING PRE-PLAN Prior to issuing the C.O., a pre-plan, site plan shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. The fOllowing items shall be shown on the plan. 2) Building footprint and building dimensions 3) Fire lanes and width of fire lanes 4) Water mains and their sizes, indicate looped or dead end 5) Fire hydrant locations 6) P.I.V. - Fire Department connection 7) Gas meter (shut-off), NSP (shut off) 8) Lock box location 9) Fire walls, if applicable 10) Roof vents, if applicable 11) Interior walls 12) Exterior doors 13) Location of fire alarm panel 14) Sprinkler riser location 15) Exterior L.P. storage, if applicable 16) Haz. Mat. storage, if applicable 17) Underground storage tanks locations, if applicable 18) Type of construction walls/roof 19) Standpipes PLEASE NOTE: Plans with topographical information, contour lines, easement lines, property lines, setbacks, right-of-way lines, headings, and other related lines or markings, are not acceptable, and will be rejected. --- Director Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #07-1991 Da t e : 01/16/91 Revised: 02/18/94 Page 1 of 1 .' C I TV 0 F CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN. MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY FIRE HYDRANT INST ALLA TION The following items are procedures for installation, testing, and putting into service new or relocated fire hydrants: 1. Immediately after installing or relocating a fire hydrant, it must be securely covered by the contractor with a plastic bag to indicate it is "out of service". The plastic bag may only be removed for testing of the fire hydrant by city employees. 2. Upon approval of all testing (hydro, bacteria, flush and conductivity) and city acceptance, the Chanhassen Utility Department will open the gate valve, remove the plastic bag and flush the hydrant. **PLEASE NOTE: The Utility Department requires a 48 hour advance notice to schedule turning on or off water lines and performing tests. 3. Only at this point will the hydrant be considered ready for Fire Department operation. APp~2~tor Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Hydrant Installation Policy #47-1998 Date: 01/23/98 Revised: Page 1 of 1 C ITV OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSENFIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 1. Permits are required for all sprinkler work. 2. A minimum of four sets of plans are required. Send, or drop off plans and specifications and calculations to: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 3 . Yard post indicators are required and must have tamper protection. 4. All control values must be provided with tamper protection. 5. All systems tests must be witnessed by the Chanhassen Fire Marshal. Appointments can be made by calling the Fire Marshal at 937-1900, ext. 132, between 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM, Monday through Friday. Please try to arrange tests at least 24 hours in advance. All revisions of25 heads or more will require a test. 6. Main drains & inspector test connections must be piped to the outside atmosphere. 7. Water may not be introduced into sprinkler piping from the City main until the Fire Marshal witnesses a flush test per NFP A 13-8-2.1. 8. The City of Chanhassen has adopted Appendix E (see 1305.6905 appendix chapter 38 of the MBC). Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Division Policy #40-1995 Date: 01/12/95 Revised: 03/12/97 Page 1 of2 9. All systems must be designed to NFPA-13, 1991 edition and Chapter 6 Standards. All attic systems are to be spaced at a maximum 130 square foot coverage. 3/4" plastic piping will not be allowed at any time in attic space. 10. All equipment installed in a fire protection system shall be UL listed or factory mutual approved for fire protection service. 11. Fire protection systems that are hydraulically calculated shall have a 5 psi safety factor at maximum system flow. 12. Acceptable water supplies for fire sprinkler systems are listed in NFPA-13, 1991 ed., Chapter 7. Swimming pools and ponds are not acceptable primary water supplies. 13. Pressure and gravity tanks shall be sized per the requirements contained in NFP A-13 and 22. Duration of the water supply shall match the hazard classification of the occupancy. 14. Include spec sheets for fire sprinkler heads - dry pipe/pre-action valving. 15. The definition of inspection is contained in MN Rule 7512.0100 Subpart 10, and states that inspection means: 1. Conducting a final acceptance test. 2. Trip test of dry pipe, deluge or preaction valves. 3. A test that an authority having jurisdiction requires to be conducted under the supervision of a contractor. Only licensed fire protection contractors are permitted to conduct these tests. 4. All other inspections including the inspectors test, main drain and other valves are pennitted under MN Rule 7512.0400 Subpart-2G, as maintenance activities and do not require a license as a fire protection contractor. 16. Per Section 904.3.2. and the 1994 Uniform Building Code, an approved audible sprinkler flow alarm to alert the occupants shall be provided in the interior of the building in a nOffi1ally occupied location. (Location must be approved by the Chanhassen Fire Marshal). 17. In existing systems, the following shall apply: 1. If any changes in the hydraulically most demanding area, or an addition of25 or more heads, hydraulic calculations will need to be provided. 2. If an addition or change of 25 or more heads to a system, a test will need to be completed. 18. Fire Department connections (FDC) must be provided with brass screw on caps. ~f~~ Approved-Public Safety Director Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Division Policy #40-1995 Date: 01/12/95 Revised: 03/25/97 Page: 2 of 2 C ITV OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN. MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY MAXIMUM ALLOWED SIZE OF DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ON A COMBINATION DOMESTIC/FIRE SPRINKLER SUPPLY LINE 1. Domestic water line shall not be greater than 1/4 pipe size of the combination service water supply line. 2. 1 1/2" domestic off 6" line. 3. 2" domestic off 8" line. 4. 2 1/2 domestic off 10" line. Option 1: Domestic sizes may be increased if it can be calculated hydraulically that the demand by all domestic fixtures will not drop the fire sprinkler water below its minimum gallonage required. Option 2: Combination domestic and five line service shall have an electric solenoid valve installed on the domestic side of the service. This valve shall be normally powered open and close on loss of electric power or signal from the system water flow indicator. Must be approved by the Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Mechanical Inspector. ~~ 7J~ Chanhassen Fire Department Water Line Sizing Policy #36-1994 Date: 06/10/94 Revised: Page 1 of 1 Approved - Public Safety Director CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 937-1900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION APPLICANT: C~i"l\ Co~Po1Z-.A-T IDJ OWNER: ADDRESS: '2..c-, IS l) J I v'ltrZt; ('1 A{f 1-1 :#Jt;o ADDRESS: C;, 'fJ4.UL- fY)J -SS II t/ TELEPHONE (Day time) (.p Y-<.o - 1711 TELEPHONE: _ Comprehensive Plan Amendment _ Temporary Sales Permit - Conditional Use Permit - Vacation of ROW/Easements - Interim Use Permit - Variance _ Non-conforming Use Permit - Wetland Alteration Permit _ Planned Unit Development* _ Zoning Appeal _ Rezoning _ Zoning Ordinance Amendment _ Sign Permits _ Sign Plan Review .4- Notification Sign X Site Plan Review* -X... Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** ($50 CUP/SPR/V ACN AR/W AP/Metes and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB) L Subdivision* ,,,,\ TOTAL FEE $ C]Z-p, - A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application. . . Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. '*Twenty-six full size ~ copies of the plans must be submitted, Including an 8W' X 11" reduced copy of transparency for each plan sheet. ** Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract NOTE _ When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. 'ROJECTNAME CH~~t-lA::")c,~J EAC:>T b.J~IJ~~., ('"-~JTr=2- ~JV..,i:-ny: .OCATION c;E t: A-T1/+1, H F:D -EGALDESCRIPTION S~~ 1+/TA-/ \-\ ~D rOTALACREAGE c::;r:::....-~~ ~rJA-btl~b rv'ETLANDS PRESENT YES Y NO 'RESENT ZONING I b P ~EQUESTED ZONING <:; A- ~ c 'RESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION (C)' F~ \ L(. ~EQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION "'S-A \'V\ E:. ~EASON FOR THIS REQUEST c:::::; v 72, DIY I .c.." D J { J.....}bvc,l.!21 AL . SITE ?/-AI-i f2-Yi-Y \ ~-IJ ihis application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information md plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning )epartment to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. \ determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written lotice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application. rhis is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with 11] City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom he City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either ;opy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make his application and the fee owner has also signed this application. will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further mderstand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any luthorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of ny knowledge. rile city hereby notifies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing 'equirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day ~xtension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review ~X! ions are appro d by the gpplicant. ~)I _ ~ oJ"-- ~ I I t.-) "'" t-k. '- I ,41 vi !th....., V, " 2.11'.t:l\\ ~i~nf~~e. of Ap lica. fl Date \\J\ ~\YJ\ I ~'-7 . Vl . L . L-i ~y Signature of 7'e Owner / Date ~plication Received on Fee Paid Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting. Jf not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, April 1, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers 690 City Center Drive SUBJECT: Request for a Lot Split and Site Plan Review for Two Industrial Buildings APPLICANT: CSM Corporation LOCATION: Southwest corner of Dell Road and Hwy. 6 NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicant, CSM Corporation, is requesting preliminary plat of Lot 2, Block 1, Chanhassen East Business Center Second Addition (3.46 acres) into 2 lots; site plan review of two buildings (15,005 sq. ft. and 12,727 sq. ft.) and vacation of existing drainage and utility easements on property zoned lOP and located in the southwest corner of Dell Road and Hwy. 5, CSM Corporation, Chanhassen East Business Center Phase III. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Commission Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The Developer will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. The commission will then make a recommendation to the City Council. Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmin at 937-1900 ext. 120. If you choose "to... submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on March 19, 1998: . ~ gyJl. ~(ifolq~ I AlIaJ\V ~ HNKE BROS INC KAHNKE BROS INC SYSTEMS CONTROL :TORIA, MN VICTORIA, MN 9555 JAMES AVE S 386 55386 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 S PROPERTIES CHANHASSEN HOLD KRENGEL,ALEX A 11 SHADY OAK RD 14201 EXCELSIOR BLVD 8009 CHEYENNE AVE ~NETONKA, MN MINNETONKA, MN CHANHASSEN,MN 343 55343 55317 HNSON,LOREN R AMADEO,GERARD S HAGEMAN,GLENN A 11 CHEYENNE AVE 8007 CHEYENNE AVE 8021 CHEYENNE SPUR ANHASSEN,MN CHANHASSEN,MN CHANHASSEN,MN ~17 55317 55317 MIL TON,RUSSEL STEWART,MARIL YN GABBERT,PAUL J 19 CHEYENNE SPUR 8015 CHEYENNE AVE 8012 CHEYENNE AVE ANHASSEN,MN CHANHASSEN,MN CHANHASSEN,MN ~17 55317 55317 IBINSON,DANIEL RUST,GAYLON R & SVVEDBERG,VALBOR 14 CHEYENNE AVE 8017 CHEYENNE SPUR 8016 CHEYENNE AVE ANHASSEN,MN CHANHASSEN,MN CHANHASSEN,MN 317 55317 55317 HOLLMAN,WAL TE TOENJES,ROBERT WILLlAMS,WAYNE 11 DAKOTA CIR 8018 CHEYENNE AVE 8023 CHEYENNE SPUR !ANHASSEN, MN CHANHASSEN,MN CHANHASSEN,MN 317 55317 55317 UMPFL,ALOIS J HUMASON,CRAIG T BAGLEY, DOUGLAS 27 CHEYENNE TRL 8025 CHEYENNE SPUR 8020 CHEYENNE AVE IANHASSEN, MN CHANHASSEN,MN CHANHASSEN,MN 317 55317 55317 ZIERSKI,RAYMO ARMBRUST,ROBERT THOMAS,GEORGE & 13 DAKOTA CIR 8022 CHEYENNE AVE 8029 CHEYENNE AVE IANHASSEN, MN CHANHASSEN,MN CHANHASSEN,MN 317 55317 55317 RRELL,MICHAEL SEWARD,ROBERT K DORFNER,RICHARD 24 CHEYENNE AVE 8031 CHEYENNE AVE 8026 CHEYENNE AVE IAN HASSEN, MN CHANHASSEN,MN CHANHASSEN,MN 317 55317 55317 ;KNESS, CONRAD WALLlN,MARY ANN 33 CHEYENNE AVE 8035 CHEYENNE AVE IANHASSEN, MN CHANHASSEN,MN 317 55317 s !t.JaA'<I se az!s awes) 09179# slaqel Jasel W3Ia^owa~ AJa^\I KOENIG,MICHAEl 8005 CHEYENNE AVE CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 KRAUS,WllLlAM J 8008 CHEYENNE AVE CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 ~4 07 116 22 33 0003 LYMAN LUMBER CO POBOX 40 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 ~4 07 116 22 34 0019 THE PRESS INC 18780 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 18-116-22-22-0005 CSM INVESTORS INC 2575 UNIVERSITY AVE W #150 ST PAUL MN 55114 CHANHASSEN,CITY 690 COULTER DR CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 FRASCH,RICHARD 8010 CHEYENNE AVE CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 14 07 116 22 33 0005 TOM REDMOND 18930 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 14 is 116 22 21 0004 CSM INVESTORS INC 257~ UNIVERSITI AVE W #150 ST pAUL MN 55 4 18-116-22-22-0004 CSM INVESTORS INC 2575 UNIVERSITY AVE W #150 ST PAUL MN 55114 lEWIS,TERRY J & 8013 CHEYENNE CIR SW CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 GAGNER,EUGENE l 8025 DAKOTA AVE CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 JENSEN,lEE & PA 8009 DAKOTA CIR CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 14 07 116 22 33 0027 JAY L & PEGGY M KRONICK 8575 TELLERS RD C~SKA MN 55318 18-116-22-22-0006 CSM INVESTORS INC '2575 UNIVERSITY AVE W #150 ST PAUL MN 55114 18-116-22-22-0002 MN/CHANHASSEN RPFIII L L C 3003 SUMMER ST STAMFORD CT 06905 "Q c\! ~ ~ ~ Cl 0 "Q rb? ~ ~ ~~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ .tJ ~ Cl c\! ~j ~u ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 .~ 0 .~ .~ ~c .~ c\! ~9 c\!C t>c ~S' t>~ ~S' ~- ..... - ..... - ~~I ~II ~II ~II ~ -€~ ~~ c ~ N i3~ ~'" '" rb?;:;:' ~, ~ rb?'" :;;I'" rb? ~] ~] cl3] o .. c\! C6')] if ~ ~ ~ E U rb? rb? ~ .E rb? :;;I ~ ~ rb? 'll. 'll., c\! Fo~ f!:Fo! ~ ~ ~ rb? rb? c\!<: 1l ~~ UlXl L ~ r I j'! 'J It iIi 83 5~i .J:l';~ 5JJ Yl :::g~oIl V) u '1IIm/lll~ I L t:l o .p t;$c t;;.5' 0.... m~1 N ~c<'l {tI)-;;:;- ~j t:l o .p t;$ ~q ~;... g:J1I "€~ zj u u H \Hi U ~ ~ 1 I '8~ t d o .p ~c t;;.~ ~II g:J~ c<'l ~....... {tI)c<'l ~] g:JtI) t:l o .p ~ ~~ 0==< .... g:J1I c -5~ :;jc<'l 0] Cf.)tI) 8~il .~.:; ~UJ gIl ~~~ V) u ~III~II~ ~ ~ :=::l QJ A ~ F1 0 <=g (tI) ~ QJ ~~ g:J '" QJ t:l e; ~ .~ {tI) Cl t;$ QJ1 ~..d ~U l=l ~ QJ (tI) t;$ ~ ~ ~ ~ QJ U (tI) (tI) QJ .s {tI) :;j ~ ~ (tI) t;$ g:J t:l QJ (tI) (tI) t;$~ 1~ O~ ~ ~ * ~ 1I ~ I d ~~ ~ .!. s m ~ - S '" i ~ H l ~uj~~~~~~~~~ ~ , ! ~l ~ :~;I b ii j ~., ~g~~..~.. ji" nU~ ~~31!~~~~~~..::~~! sf ~ il I ~!~~~: ; i ~u~ i !J ~~ . SS ~99!iS ; ~llill!llliPiil Ji !I .:~ UUU !~ IJ -! j- I '~ c5 I~ <<t' I. ..., =! Ol 5 1 n 01 ~ .-1 a.. I .... 0;, .... 1 OIl 1 e<<1 I 0" ull .... I ~li 0 I CIl" I u I I I .... L--1_ :r: t.:l cr rl I I i I I '" I l1.> I I I ! I I ~ I 1 x ~ ~ I I I I ::c: I I I I z I I j 0 ilJ ;::: 1 ~ I a: 0 I a.. it 0 Vl I z z :z ~ I!' U m .... {-. I ,IJ JI, .... m 0 '" < 0 .... ". z 81. w ::; .... .p ~ a.. I : Ji! w 0 I ~Jl!i I ~ I I I ~ I I 0 I Vl w I r-r"'1 z ~~~ , z I I >- I 1 I ~ G)(~ I!~I L ;" -~= W'O>l ffi~ -1 0"1 3.ZL.HotN -, I I I I ~ 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I :;1 I I ~I I I I I I I I I I I I I LDlllIWtCN .......-. ~ I .IN I ti ~8! I ~~I I bi u.. I I~ l~ III~~ I i:!!J I e J Ims lIlit I . I ill ti ~ . 4 / ~B u i-,i en I~ / I :h mil !i! ~1 / / ~ . / . j'<} ~Ii I -!J ! . '" hI -'j" I / S.il hI I !! III I I -! ~h ~z . I ~ I I- I I I '.:i' I I .t / ~ I I / r- / / C"l I I / / / / / 0' / / ~~ I I (""\ I ~ v ..L V I / / / I / 80Wt M .rt,tzow s I I I I / / I >- I :5 / I / I I ..... / / 'v/ ~ / L'_ 0 .. () -- ~ I / . " ..... ~ / / 1 " ~ I . ~ / ~ N .....~ I ;> 1 I I <1)9 ,. ~ / ~ / x ; ~ ~i ~ I f2 i I I () . I ~ I I c--l I r \ t 1 I ;1) I / I it 0 z LD \-- I I .!J ~ I I I' I ot'L9t ~j ~ J.ZI,LLoLON I () I )1, ~ 0 I !U ,) ~Ctg I I ::r:: F ;:~g I !n I:! ~ .( 8~~ 0 >- ~~: I 1:<: I 9 _J I I ~j I '0' :( 811 1:<: I >- I I .1' 8 I .. fl ~ ..... _J I : f' O~ I I .Iu~ L'_ ~ ! ~ I ~ () .....~ I " ! I .....~ ~ j I ~: <1)3 ~ I \ ~J ~~ , I :~ il I I >- cD I 1:<: z I <( no I L.J I I~ D I I I I I I~ I I .~ ;o'KZ :] .Zl.'l.oLO N I . .( I il >- " () l..,- I I ~ 0' l- I", I I~ LoJ -<"\.J 7 I ') I '" 'I 1-<"/10 I ~ .. ~ ; '-' I .. . ~ ~ ~~ fl ~ .1 b If .. . d eJ J~ I c! 01 '~I ,,<;;, ....' O!I ~I 0" Ull ~li CIl" U ~ E ~ IiW g 5~ ww~~ ~~;~~U ~ i Ih Ilu i I w CL w 13 ~ II ~UU~!~ ~~~~~ uuu ~ ~ 8 I J' I < T i i. IO II \:,,1 ~, I it.. ~ 'I . g! 1 'IJ J , m ~ / 1;1' gf I .p :m ~JUi ~ I ! ~I! il'; ~ g ~i I i I i i I ~;! i :I!ili ~ ~!! Ii ~~ I!' i ! ~~~ ~ i ~~i ~ ;e'!f~ ~ t I h Ir ~I ~jl I . i 8~i ! Iii! I il!i!ji !Ifill ! Iii Iii,! ; !!I illl I ~ I t~b ~ r:l53~ s. Ww . B wG <s" i II! ~~~ ~ g ;iep ~i:u! dl i; I.~ iqei & ~ d ~~;~ ~ I ~ ~:r ~ ;i.I;; i; ~ I=g W i~! Ii :h~ w; ; wi ~il! S i ~ ::i i A;~:I! ;~! 1:1 i I:~ d ~f~a it ; Ii ~~~~ = ~ : i;~ ~ Iliii8~ i II !h = :~I ~: ~dll! ,!~ ii~! ~ . t ~ ;/il ~ iJl2~i I i ;;i; d~ ~e il!i ~; w n i~~a ~ j I~ I ;t11 ; 'tell! ~ I! ic,b I a-i II w~wi ~i i it ~~Ii ; ~ Ii: iis i ~~Mi I i~ !~ liE II :II! !! II; S:e~ i ~ ~! S rIA ~ :sii:1f ~ i! iill ill I twh Ii I i~ ~~d ~ ~ :..." i ::::: ..... ~ :I ~ ~i i :1- ..:r ."" :1i ...:l.J,. "'0 00. >- .z :w '::l; :i: if w 0, ;:5 \ ~ o , VJ . w z z- 2 ..... \ , " , , " , , / ..... ., .'. J.D....~ M-a-i ~ ~ .. u ~ 1&&1 7 CI"! NN ; ~:3 ! ~ ~~ ~ CII ~: ~ et:: 0( e :rw"".... ::J: 5! ~ ~!:i ; i- ~ il~",~ Ii' ~ I !~'::il i ~. ~ i; e ~II~~I~ i ~~ ~ ~~ ; ~ I il:lift~ i~ ~i A ~~ J ~ ~ 5ehi ~ ~ i! ~~ i ~ wi!1 ~ i; I." 0 ~~ :1 li!1 -! I ;1: i; ~ ~~ I ~"~IJ . ~& I ~~ ,~~ - ~r~ . ~ 98 ..~ il ~i . ~~ i~~ Iii ~ ~~: i' ~ is i: ~=i ~~I; e ~ ~!! j KI ii !I~;~I; i; ;1 I !!I ~ il I. i~=~Ei~ II ~. I ~.; ! i~ Ii e;~!I!~1 I. i; ~ ;I~! ~ ~I ~5Iil'~ ~~ ~~ ; ~ft9 ~ !~ ~ Ii ~~ ~ b Ii if . . .. d! ~ O. .... -';1 Cl. .... OIl ~I 0" u- ull 0 ::all ill" Up u f- II I :r: ; !O! '-' c;: r { . ( ~I!!. I z !dl I 0 LD e:: : : 'S! I I u . . . -, => .~ .: : {o ~ c:: ; ~ ; \ II ~ Iii z a H 0 ::I: t.J i!e:i II .... 0 I. % '" z ill ~I 0 ... I ~ Sl ~ :J 0 Cl. it 0 V1 z Z ~ ~ ,!I f- 5~ 'II u- rn 0 h i'! c 0 f- "0. z gl. U.J ::; ,.. -II ~ i Ii! U.J 0 .Iu~ ~ g V1 U.J Z Z ~ ~ ~ .Lo.....""'.......-a... ~ ~ "i ~~ i~ ~I ,- < ~ ;-; "... . ' !j i~ 1- ) , , , , '.' I:~ . ill! m "'! ~ s e~ ~~ ~~ ~;~ ~~ *5~ iS~ ~ll; ~8~ iii~ ~~i Ih ~!~ , r~~ ~s~ iidiJi :St;ii H'" :; .2~sn:' · ~~! ,:; :: ::'" \1 1 ':. "" .", · . ,. '- . : I ",:, " 01 .: ~.!.: l:;-J " ! . I~~ " I -di ~ .. , 111I >r ! ~9~~a ~hd ~ I · r!l : i ~ I ~~ I~i ~ ;~~I . I ~i ~ s~t~~ ! :~ IlW~ ~ .I~"i ~i 3H~a d ;III~" II I~i:i ~S bi:! " .. !~ jii ~" ti ~. I~ el iI i ~ i I d "J II ill ~m gn i ~ ~ .~.i 1011I. I I i~i5" ' ... - Ii ~~ ~I fh~ IlB ei ~IIII :i ~W ~J r~~ ~ ~ lIIi~ g~ MI ~ ~u ;1 Ir;~ ~~ ~i ~h!~! _, ~~ ' ei~~ ii~ ~~ ... '~II ~Iii ~; - ih M~ i~ ~ * U ~~~ i~l!J ~~! d* .. ~i; sJ .;. ~ ..t ~a il i a:J...aolOC..........~ 'j la ! . !I !J -! J- j d 01 '-1 -;II ~. OIl E'41 0" ull ::l;!fl CIlia u i J II ~ 8 II ~l I }1. ~ '. .; ~~ ~I 'IJ J , m ~ '0. g,. .J! :m .Jui ~ ~ '" ~ ....~ ~ I , r ! II I ' " i i i i i s s s ;1 . b it . , , I I I ~ ~ .. 111111 d 1 i 1 11 t I I I I I I ~ I il ! 1 f . i tis ( n ~ ~ ~ '.l .. .. .,., ., i 11 ~_.".- . R , , . I . I k I I 1.1 ~1~ I ) d I! i !! i ! it: f 1) Ul t q J I I n j l:p i 1 i'l ~ I ! t I. 1 l1J, It II III J j J ~It f f P till i t an i 1 j I II t I I ! J I III I III J ~ IIl1il i 1 JH . . . p. I ~! I Ii II! ii II illll Iq ill ~lllj ! J i 3 3 z rn · I I t I ~~ II' 11 d Ii pI t II il~; d P ! q it 11 u! )1 01 ~I ~JJJ iii I I '~I I iii ! i ! i ; it 1 J II !t m II -;1 v .... l[i!lll;~ U I I I . ~ I I 0'1 ~l 0'1 Uti L&..: : ::I! ,I 0': CIl"" " U I- ~G . '{i ~ ~ I 11.1 ,I! II J'l! Iff n I. tIll I Hll Ir.t II If I ; 'it, i..11 J II ilt \ it 0 z .!j .; I' lI' ~j I 111 m i:! < 0 'V' . II:. 811 !Iil :jlL I 11 'II ; : h! I Ib ~ '11 tI' ~III~ ~II.,flll I !~d~ . H II fl ~ If !iii' ip1liit ! i 0 Ill!' !It ,lS If II I III Innlll .'" I~ , I J 1:1, l, 9. II> I~~ ;~ a:l I "'. '" ! " ..' .~ 1-" ;.. " !g i!~ F L- '. , \ \\::1:j \~ ., , ,J,' I .' ~ 0: Lallltl,"",~~ CSIVr Corporation 5~ff, LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Monday, March 16, 1998 To City of Chanhassen 690 Coultier Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attention: Sharmin AI-Jaff Re:Chanhassen East Business Center III Chanhassen, MN Shop drawings Prints Plans Samples Specifications X Copy of Letter Change Order Computer Disk RFt:t:'VF:O MAR 1 7 1998 We are sending you X Attached Under separate cover the following items: CITY Vi" vnt""nA.:>SEN copies date no. description Letter for Screening Issue Trash Enclosure Elevations 1 These are transmitted as checked below: For Approval Approved as submitted For your use Approved as noted X As requested Returned for corrections For review and comment For bids due Resubmit copies for approval Submit copies for distribution Return corrected prints These are sent as checked below. Fed Ex Messenger Service UPS >', Mail To be picked up by Hand Delivered Remarks: copy to: File sent by: Mark Kusnierek Rough Sawn Cedar - Clear Sealer Finish \- 14'-0'Q .\ East and West Elevations Scale 1/4QQ = lQ-OQQ CMU #1 Shelly - Canyon Tan CMU #2 Asttoglaze - Riviera TOP OF mSONRY (jQ-8QQ L 1~~ ~ North and SouLth Elevations Scale 1/4'Q = 1'_0" Ch21nh21ssen East Business Center Phase III Trash Enclosure CSM Corporation -:::::::"- 2575 Univers1ty Avenue W., #ISl ~ St. Paul, Minnesota 55114-1024 Chanhassen East Business Center Phase III CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SIGNAGE CRITERIA GENERAL NOTES 1) TENANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PURCHASE, INSTALLATION AND MAINTAINENCE OF ALL SIGNS DESCRIBED IN THIS CRITERIA PACKAGE. 2) TENANT SHALL OBTAIN OWNER'S APPROVAL AND CITY PERMITS PRIOR TO ANY SIGNAGE INSTALLATION. 3) TENANT MAY SOLICIT BIDS FROM ANY SIGN MANUFACTURER OF TENANT'S CHOICE. 4) OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO APPROVE ANY ALTERNATE SIGNAGE WHEN DEEMED APPROPRIATE AT THE OWNER'S SOLE DISCRETION. 5) SIGNAGE ON THE BUILING FRONT SHALL BE AS DESCRIBED ON PAGE 2 AND 3. SUBMITTALS 1) TENANT SHALL SCBMIT TO THE OWNER, TWO COPIES OF ALL SIGN FACE LAYOUTS, AND THE LOCATION OF ALL SIGNS ON THE BUILDING, FOR APPROVAL. 2) TENANT OR THE TENANT'S SIGN CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SIGNAGE PLANS TO THE CITY, AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY, FOR PERMITS. CSM Corporation 2575 UNIVERSITY AVE. w. ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 646-1717 FAX 646-2404 PAGE 1 of 4 2/20/98 Chanhassen East Business Center Phase III CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SIGNAGE CRITERIA CENTER LOGO AND TENANT NAME BETWEEN BLOCK BANDS MAX. ALLOWED SIGNAGE AREA SHOWN DASHED PARTIAL ELEVATION SINGLE LINE MAX. ALLOWED SlGNAGE AREA SHOWN DASHED ~ 24" MAX. HEIGHT REVERSE CHANNEL LETTERS. 24" MAXIMUM OVERALL TEXT HEIGHT. SEE PAGE 3 FOR SECTION 30" MAX. HEIGHT LOGO PARTIAL ELEVATION MULTIPLE LINES CS:NI Corporation 2575 UNIVERSITY AVE. w. ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 646-1717 FAX 646-2404 PAGE 2 of 4 2/20/98 r1l . ~. .' E' 1 ClIl.annaSsen : as L Phase III CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SIGNAGE CRITERIA Fiq. A '~4 Exterior Bldg. Fo.ce 0.09 AluMinuM Pcinted Cho.nnel typ Letters 8, Logo PK electrode Housing 15r"M \.,Ihi te Neon (Cptiwno.D SIGNAGE 1. LOGO: . ~ 4 .. N . v; .. l.. o 0 ~ (lI C"1 g' (\J ~ ...J ~ X X <!: '" :>: :>: ~ Bllsiness 4~ .125' Cleo.r Lexo.n (Neon Only) 120V electrico.l to Tro.nsforMer (\.,lith Neon Only) Note: U.L. Listing is not o.vo.ilo.ble Por exposed neon. NOTES MAX SIZE: 4'-0" LONG X 2'-6" HIGH MAX. AREA: 10 SQUARE FEET COLOR: GLOSS BLACK LIGHTING: HALO/BACK LIGHTING ONLY. Center 2 TENANT NAME: SINGLE LINE SHALL BE 24" MAX. HEIGHT ~\'IULTIPLE LINES SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 24" HEIGHT WITH CHARACTERS NOT EXCEEDING 24". LETTER TYPE: REVERSE CHANNEL METAL LETTERS (HALO/BACK LIGHTING OPTIONAL) COLOR: GLOSS BLACK C8M Corporation 2575 UNIVERSITY AVE. W. ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 646-1717 FAX 6!16-240-1 PAGE J of 4 2/20/98 Chanhassen East Business Center Phase III CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SIGNAGE CRITERIA 55555 6" HIGH STENCILLED OR VINYL LETTERS: COLOR - WHITE TENANT NAME 4" HIGH STENCILED OR VINYL LETTERS: COLOR - WHITE EXTERIOR DOOR ELEVATION CSM Corporation 2575 UNIVERSITY AVE. W. ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 646-1717 FAX 646-2404 PAGE 4 OF 4 2/20/98 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING APRIL 1, 1998 Chairman Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Craig Peterson, LuAnn Sidney, Allyson Brooks, Alison Blackowiak, Kevin loyce, and Matt Burton MEMBERS ABSENT: Ladd Conrad STAFF PRESENT: Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and Sharmin Al-laff, Planner II; and Dave Hempel, Asst. City Engineer PUBLIC HEARING: CSM CORPORATION REOUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LOT 2. BLOCK 1. CHANHASSEN EAST BUSINESS CENTER SECOND ADDITION (3.45 ACRES) INTO 2 LOTS: SITE PLAN REVIEW OF TWO BUILDINGS 05.005 SO. FT. AND 12.727 SO. FT.) AND VACATION OF AN EXISTING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON PROPERTY ZONED lOP AND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DELL ROAD AND HWY 5. CHANHASSEN EAST BUSINESS CENTER PHASE III. Sharmin AI-Jaff presented the staff report on this item. Peterson: Questions for staff? Brooks: Are you absolutely comfortable then with their landscaping plan? Sharmin Al-laff: Yes. lill, our City Forester did review the changes and she, there are minor changes that yet need to take place but they are very simple and. Brooks: But they will shield the view of the parking from the view? Sharmin Al-laff: Not immediately. As the trees mature, yes they will be adequate. Now with the berm, they've increased the height of the berm an additional two feet. We feel that will provide the screening of the parking lot. Brooks: How tall are the trees they're going to put in there? Sharmin Al-laff: By ordinance the evergreens have to be a minimum of 6 feet. And the overs tory 2 Y2 inch caliper minimum. Burton: In the report you discuss the trash enclosure between the two sites and that there are shrubs just on the south side. Has there been any modification of that or was that? Planning Commission Meeting - April 1, 1998 Sharrnin Al-Jaff: That remains as is and the last page of your staff report shows the trash enclosure. It's materials that are identical to the building and it will be located right between the two buildings so it's accessible by both. Peterson: Any questions of staff? Joyce: Just a couple quick ones. What is, in condition 13, the first part of that. The first motion it says, meet with Building Official to discuss building plans. That's kind of vague. Sharrnin Al-Jaff: Steve Kirchman, the Building Official always requests that the applicant meet with him to discuss industrial building plans. That's all. Joyce: I think you duplicated two conditions in the second part. Condition 5 and 11 look like they're the same. Sharrnin Al-Jaff: You're right. Joyce: You're comfortable with the trash enclosure, where it's at? Sharrnin Al-Jaff: Yes. If they do add the landscaping along the side. Joyce: I'm just wondering why we have it so close to the street. Why did we put the trash enclosure in the middle of that, like that? What was the reason behind that? Sharrnin Al-Jaff: To have it in one area, they need an outdoor trash enclosure. Rather than having two separate trash enclosures, we prefer to see one. Joyce: Okay, that makes sense. I can understand that. Okay. The last thing, maybe I should wait for the applicant but I can't see the board with the rendering there. Were they going to do something with the entryway? Sharrnin Al-Jaff: Yes. Their original plan showed a canopy basically identical to what you see out there today. They changed this so that there is a canopy above each entryway and it's not, it kind of narrows down as you get to the end of, from one side of the entryway to the other. It's not your typical everyday. Joyce: I couldn't see that when it was laying down. Now I see what you're saying. I guess it's I guess a teal color they were talking about or something like that, green? Sharrnin Al-Jaff: Right. Which is similar to what you see out there today. As far as the material, this is the other building and to give you a comparison between the two. They plan on doing is the south portion. Lighter color on one and darker on the other. Then the bottom portion is the... Joyce: Okay. 2 Planning Commission Meeting - April 1, 1998 Sharmin AI-Jaff: One of the concerns that we had, it's not addressed in the staff report. Is there enough of a difference in the colors to actually be able to tell that. Those are two different buildings. We had that experience with Mission Hills. We thought that we had different colors but they really, you have to look very closely to distinguish between. Joyce: This is lighter on the top and darker on the bottom where the other one's kind of all dark, if I remember correctly. Sharmin AI-Jaff: And they're using some tile as accent. Joyce: Okay, thanks Sharmin. Peterson: While you're there Sharmin. One of my concerns was somewhat addressed already by having the pitched roof. . . that's more dissimilar now than the rest of the buildings surrounding it. Not being able to compare now the buildings that are in the first two phases, how from your perspective, how do you compare those buildings? Is that building going to be unique or is it still going to look substantially the same in color and texture as the buildings that are already there? Joyce: The existing buildings have a darker brick and then there's a row of windows on the bottom.. .on the top. If you look at these, you see the glass wall extends all the way to the top in some areas. Then this second building is slightly different by creating an L shaped out of the glass so they are similar yet there are some differences. Peterson: Yeah it does. Seeing it from that distance and looking at the plans that were presented to us, I'm a little bit concerned that there still isn't enough differentiation from the other buildings that are there. I don't want to have a congregation of buildings that are so similar, and particularly in the entrance to the city. I'm very concerned that they aren't differentiating enough and I guess I'm going to look to the commissioners to really address that issue ifit's adequately enough. Sharmin AI-Jaff: The dark brick has been eliminated altogether. As far as the color of the brick, we are comfortable. The question becomes is there enough difference between the two colors. Peterson: And then architecturally I think, seemingly you're convinced that architecturally the buildings are unique enough so that getting rid of the pitched roof effectively removes that similarity enough to create that change. Any questions of staff? Hearing none, does the applicant or their designee wish to address the Planning Commission? If so, please come forward and address please. Mark Kusnierek: My name is Mark Kusnierek. I'm the Senior Project Architect for CSM Corporation. We're located at 2575 University Avenue in St. Paul. The reason for us coming in for this change in site plan has been from the demographics that we have studied, of the history that we have been over saturating the area with office warehouse. We found that there's a high number of users that want smaller office square footage from 3,000 to 5,000 square foot 3 Planning Commission Meeting - April 1, 1998 increments. So we've come to you tonight to present these two projects. Keeping smaller buildings that were previously out there to break up large buildings down to a smaller unit. The similarities between them, if I can address, is that the only thing that is similar in what we see is the block color itself. That is the same block color that we used in the previous one. The brick that is out at the other one is at the comer units and goes all the way up, just at the comers themselves. And then projects as little arches over some ofthe other areas. The window patterns themselves are much different and much larger in these office buildings than they were in the previous ones. Also, the elimination of the truck docks. We've got them architecturally designed all the way around the entire building to help that out. With the suggestion from staff to eliminate the pyramid, we've come forward with the post modem canopy to help out as well. We feel that this is a very good and clean design that could enhance the gateway to Chanhassen. The berm itself, to help out with that. Highway 5 is below the level of the parking at that elevation so you're going to be looking up at a 4 foot high berm with the parking behind it so we feel that you're not going to see the cars immediately adjacent to it. If you see anything, it would be from further beyond. With the landscaping, then that can help as well. I guess ifthere's any questions I can address them now for you. Any concerns that you might have. We also have with us tonight Tim Erklof from Westwood Engineering who is the civil engineers and landscapers on the project if you have any questions for him. He's be welcome to answer them for you. Peterson: Questions of the applicant? Sidney: I had a couple questions. I guess I was wondering, I think part of what we do on the Planning Commission is think about the best use for office industrial areas and wondering if there's any possibility that these buildings actually could be two story, since you're describing a need for office space. Two story buildings are good and it would give the area more of a you know differentiation in height of buildings and possibly some other architectural interest in that area. Has that ever been discussed? Mark Kusnierek: We looked at the possibility of a two story building there. The cost effectiveness was not there to help it out, as well as you would end up with one large parking lot. Because of the office square footage, the codes require a higher amount of parking required than per se the office warehouse. So you would end up, either we'd build a parking ramp to go with it to help accommodate the larger square foot. You want to get a fair size footprint with the building when you get into the two story buildings. And it just was not cost effective for that site. Sidney: For that site, okay. And then I guess I was wondering about the diversity in textures and the materials and also color and I'm wondering if we're getting too much teal here translated from the previous buildings to these buildings. I'm wondering if you'd considered other colors in the scheme. Mark Kusnierek: We did look at some other colors but we wanted some small connection back to the original three buildings. The teal is only used in the pyramids in the first three buildings. In this one we, 16 inch squares at each of the column locations or at the entrances it would be, 4 Planning Commission Meeting - April 1, 1998 the teal color on the metal of the lights. The accent lights at those entrances. So it's a smaller amount with the teal canopies and so we didn't feel it was that large an amount. If you feel that it's necessary to change the color, we're willing to work with the staff to accommodate that so. Sidney: Okay. I'd like to see some different options. You know a different, not that, I don't know what the terms is in coloration but maybe a lighter teal or something that might be a little bit different. Mark Kusnierek: If you change in colors, it's almost a change to a different color because the industry with the pre-finished panels themselves come in only a series of colors. Otherwise you get into custom colors and there again they get more expensive. It gets tough. Sidney: And then one more question before I let other people speak here. About the texture of the brick. How different is this, what you're showing than what the previous buildings have for textures and that's one of my concerns that we're getting too much of the same kind of texture being repeated in these buildings. Mark Kusnierek: The previous brick had a smoother finish to it and almost has a sheen. At some of the bricks. They're not all uniform obviously. These are more of a natural finish to the brick. And with the difference in the colors, we feel it can help a great deal. Also, above each of the windows the brick is corbel so it steps back in a little bit and then we're changing with some soldier courses and header courses as well. Sidney: So there would be some depth. Mark Kusnierek: There's going to be a little bit of depth and then the texture with the mortar joints by changing the coursing. So we're adding a different texture feel to the brick itself. Sidney: I guess my concern when I saw the original plans that you presented, you know that it was getting to be too cookie cutter so the more we can do to differentiate these buildings, the better I think. Peterson: Other questions of the applicant? A couple myself. One of the conditions, number 8, we talk about concurrent with the building permit a detailed lighting plan. What is the plans for the parking lot lighting and/or exterior lighting? Is it exactly the same as the other phases or is it going to be unique or not? Mark Kusnierek: The parking lot lights will be the same as the others one which are a box fixture that is amiable down on a 20 foot high pole. The lights on the building are different. They're not the round fixtures that you see out there. We have submitted the lights, a cut sheet of the lights to the staff at their request. They're more square. They're a halo light behind it with some other squares that light forward so it's more design into it as well. Peterson: Secondly the roof top equipment, will that be screened in the same manner as the other phases also? 5 Planning Commission Meeting - April 1, 1998 Mark Kusnierek: The roof top units will be screened. We have it at, I think we got a 3 foot parapet sitting up there. We've got the parapets or the masonry's at 20 foot 6. The joist bearing's at 17 feet. So we've got 3 feet of parapet sitting there. With the smaller office square footage, we're not going to have real large units up there. And we do move them off the first grid so they get more in the center of the building so you won't see them. Peterson: Any other questions? Thank you. May I have a motion to open this to a public hearing and a second please? Brooks moved, Sidney seconded to open the public hearing. The public hearing was opened. Peterson: This is a public hearing. Anyone wishing to address the commission please come forward and state your name and address please. Seeing none, may I have a motion and a second to close the public hearing. Joyce moved, Brooks seconded to close the public hearing. The public hearing was closed. Peterson: Commissioners, your respective thoughts. Kevin, can we start with you? Joyce: Sure. I don't have any problem with the development. I wasn't a real big fan of it. Two buildings that we started off with initially there, particularly as it being kind of the gateway to our fair city but I just thought they were very large, not really very interesting to look at so, I assume there's going to be a third large building so I guess when I saw two smaller buildings, that was a little more appreciative of that fact. So I guess I'm in favor of it. Sidney: I made most of my comments. I guess I feel more comfortable now after the applicant described the materials and the design. I still would like to see some possible alternative colors. If staff could investigate that. If it would work out. I just have a feeling like there's a little bit too much teal going on with the buildings. Just for interest sake. Peterson: Matt. Burton: I agree with the comments. Most the things that concerned me seemed to be addressed by the staff and the conditions so I feel pretty comfortable with it. Blackowiak: I have nothing new to add. Brooks: I think this building looks a lot nicer than the other two buildings. I don't think the berm in front of the other two buildings is nearly high enough and I'm hoping that, I'm trusting that this is a good, you are comfortable with the fact that this berm will protect the view and the landscaping will protect the view because really it didn't work on the other two buildings very well. But architecturally it's a much better building than the other two so I'm in favor of the project. I don't worry about the teal. 6 Planning Commission Meeting - April 1, 1998 Peterson: My thoughts are, I'm concerned that the plan has really changed from an architectural standpoint from the plan that I reviewed in our packet so I'm a little bit hesitant to approve it because I was. . . was and am concerned that I really want a distinctive building as it is, as it relates to the other phases and I think that I guess I would just ask that, and it's brought to Council that my recommendation would be to, as they get their packets, to have... with those changes and that they review that under the assumption, at least my preference would be to insure that the building is distinctive and unique as it relates to the others. It's on the surface from 10 feet away...it seems as it is, but I would have preferred to really see the opportunity, have the opportunity to see it more in detail. Understanding that that wasn't available tonight. Other than that, if my assumptions are correct, I think. ..nice building and I like the idea of two versus one. With that, may I have a motion and a second please. Blackowiak: Okay I'll move that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the preliminary plat for Subdivision #95-18 for Chanhassen Business Center, Chanhassen East Business Center, Third Addition as shown on the plat received March 2, 1998 with the following conditions, 1 through 10. Strike number 11, which appears' to be a duplicate of the previous number 5. Renumber the remaining three conditions which are listed as 8, 9 and 10 and renumber them as 11, 12 and 13. Peterson: Can I have a second please? Burton: Second. Blackowiak moved, Burton seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Subdivision #95-18 for Chanhassen East Business Center Third Addition as shown on the plat received March 2, 1998, with the following conditions: 1. Park and trail dedication fees to be collected per city ordinance. 2. The name of the subdivision shall be changed to Chanhassen East Business Center Third Addition and lots shall be described as Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. 3. The appropriate drainage and utility easements should be dedicated on the final plat for all utilities. 4. The applicant shall dedicate a cross access/parking easements over the two lots. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary financial security to guarantee compliance with the permit. 5. The installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Lake Drive East and Dell Road is expected in the future. The developer shall be responsible for a share of the local cost participation of this signal on a percentage basis based upon traffic generation from full development of this site in relation to the total traffic volume on Dell Road. The developer and/or property owner shall waive any and all procedural and substantive objections to the 7 Planning Commission Meeting - April 1, 1998 special assessments, including but not limited to hearing requirements or any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the property. 6. All areas disturbed as a result of construction activities shall be immediately restored with seed and disc-mulched or wood-fiber blanket or sod within two weeks of completion of each activity in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook. All catch basins shall be protected with silt fence or hay bales until the parking lot is paved. 7. The appropriate front, rear and side yard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat. 8. The applicant will be responsible for all boulevard restoration or damage to existing City utilities or street improvements as a result of construction. 9. The applicant shall apply for an obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, i.e. Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Waste Water Services, Minnesota Health Department, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Minnesota Department of Transportation and comply with their conditions of approval. 10. No berming or landscaping will be allowed within street right-of-way. 11. The final construction plans and specifications for the site utility improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates and/or state plumbing codes. 12. A cross access and maintenance agreement shall be executed over the easterly lot to permit utility extension and street access to the westerly lot. 13. All driveway access points along Lake Drive East shall be constructed in accordance with the City's Industrial Driveway Detail Plate No. 5207. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Peterson: Can I have a motion and a second on the subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, on page 11. Joyce: I'll make a motion for the site plan review that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan Review #95-18 for CSM Phase III as shown on the site plan received March 2, 1998 subject to conditions 1 through 13. Peterson: Is there a second? Brooks: Second. 8 Planning Commission Meeting - April 1, 1998 Joyce moved, Brooks seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan Review #95-18 for CSM Phase III, as shown on the site plan received March 2, 1998, subject to the following conditions: 1. Planting schedule shall be revised to reflect use of some of the Lake Drive boulevard tree species used in the landscape plan for previous CSM phases. 2. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to include shrubs in buffer yard plantings along Highway 5. 3. Parking lot islands shall be a minimum of 10' in width. If the applicant does not increase the width, aeration tubes shall be installed. 4. Landscape materials used along the south of the trash enclosure shall be repeated along the north portion of the structure. 5. Signage criteria: a. Each building shall share one monument sign. One monument sign per lot. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. b. Wall signs are permitted on no more that 2 street frontages. The letters shall be located within a designated sign band. c. All signs require a separate permit. d. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and add an architectural accent to the building. e. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. f. No illuminated signs within the development may be viewed from the residential section south and west of the site. g. Back-lit individual letter signs are permitted. h. Individual letters may not exceed 2 feet and logos may not exceed 30 inches in height. 1. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. 9 Planning Commission Meeting - April 1, 1998 j. The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting the signs on site. A detailed sign plan incorporating the method of lighting, acceptable to staff should be provided prior to requesting a sign permit. k. One stop sign must be posted on the driveway at the exit point of both sites. 6. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the city and provide the necessary financial securities as required for landscaping. 7. Fire Marshal conditions: a. "No parking fire lane" signs and yellow curbing shall be provided. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location of signs and curbing to be painted. b. The proposed fire hydrant between Building A and Building B must be relocated to the south. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location. c. Post Indicator Valves will be required. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact location. d. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention policy regarding premise identification. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Policy #29-1992. (Copy Enclosed.) e. Submit radius turn dimensions to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. f. Comply with Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention policy regarding fire department notes to be included on all site plans. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #04-1991. (Copy Enclosed.) g. Comply with Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention policy regarding pre- fire plans. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Policy #07- 1991. h. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/City of Chanhassen Policy regarding water service installation for commercial and industrial buildings. Pursuant to Inspection Division Water Service Installation Policy #34-1993. (Copy Enclosed.) 1. Comply with Chanhassen Fire DepartmentlFire Prevention Policy regarding maximum allowed size of domestic water service on a combination domestic fire 10 Planning Commission Meeting - April 1, 1998 supply line. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #36- 1994. J. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy regarding fire hydrant installation. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #47-1998. (Copy Enclosed.) k. Comply with Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy regarding fire department witnessing flushing of underground mains which come in to the building for fire suppression systems. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Policy #40-1995. 8. Concurrent with the building permit, a detailed lighting plan meeting city standards shall be submitted. 9. Revise plans to introduce a different pitched element on the buildings. 10. All rooftop equipment must be screened in accordance with city ordinances. 11. Enter into a cross parking/access agreements. 12. The applicant shall officially withdraw the site plan for CSM Phase II Building 2. 13. Meet with the Building Official to discuss building plans." All voted in favor and the motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING: LAND GROUP. INC. AND BLUFF CREEK PARTNERS REQUEST FOR REZONING FROM A2. AGRICULTURAL ESTATE TO PUD. PRELIMINARY PUD AND PLAT . APPROVAL FOR 3 LOTS AND ONE OUTLOT AND FOR AN OFFICE-INDUSTRIAL PROJECT WHICH WOULD PERMIT A CHURCH/INSTITUTIONAL USE ON PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF HWY. 5 AND NORTH OF COULTER BOULEVARD AT STONE CREEK DRIVE ON 27.3 ACRES. BLUFF CREEK CORPORATE CENTER. Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Peterson: Questions of staff. Sidney: Could you put that conceptual plan back up there? I don't think we saw that. I just wanted to see... And where is Highway 5? 11 'v/ J...,. o~ .....; ~ J...,.~ (1)9 ~i I I , , I I , , I , j I I I I I .-, I co I .r I I ~~ ; I i , I I i , I ~~ , I ~- r .- 5~ lo_ o m m ~ ~ ~ ~ w ., ~ '" lD ~ ~ ~ -. ,) ~: .c .- ~ ~) ~~ ~ ,- 8 ~ lo_ o w ~ ~ .. I It If '} . ;1 ;1 I;: 'I t; r.j :E .. i"L: .c n. loJ () .c ,. o ~, ~'~ :e '-' '; ~ t~ -I 13 181 III hi .. J f' 8!~ .."l! :::.Ig UK Uw () J...,. 0; .....~ " J...,.~ f3~ ~i 'O'&s:t 1 .tl.H.~O N I...,. V l1.. as! ~~I U.. W&.I ~~' IIi' tit sa iJl "'il h! I " I .J.. IlOWZ M .rr.Lt.LO $ ('.l \-- ot"l9t l.tl.U.LON () () _J ('(' .W I -J.O" I I r") -J.//O r'\ V _J ~~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1/ / I I / ~ / / ~ / / I I / / / I I / /' 1/ I I I I I / / I I / / I I / / I I .. / / .~ I I ~ j I ~ !! I .::: ~ I fl ~ I .. "J4.t I i i / I I I / I ! , J I ! , I I I , I : I I ~ ~ i = <t " ; ~ 11 I I z I : I I I : I , I : I I : I I " I ~. -. !i! .1 ~. ~i u I~ . i I "1 I }I I n. i ,.I ~ ~~ 'II 1 , ~: J5 ~ ~