The URL can be used to link to this page

D Comprehensive Plan Update Process MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Kate Aanenson AICP, Community Development Director DATE: November 17, 2005 SUBJ: Comprehensive Plan Update/System Statements While the comprehensive plan update is not due until 2008, the System Statements are out and if the City disagrees with the elements we need to have them resolved. Attached are the system statements which include Population, Households, Employment, Growth Management, Transportation, Wastewater and Regional Parks. I will review the findings of the statements with the City Council at the th work session on November 28. g:\plan\ka\2008 comp plan\cc wrkss11-28-05.doc System Statement City of Chanhassen Following the January 2004 adoption of the 2030 Regional Development Framework, and the more recent adoptions of the Transportation Policy Plan, the Water Resources Management Policy Plan, and the Regional Parks Policy Plan, the Metropolitan Council is issuing system statements pursuant to state statute. Receipt of this system statement and the metropolitan system plans triggers communities’ obligations to review and, as necessary, amend their comprehensive plans within the next three years. The complete text of the 2030 Regional Development Framework as well as complete copies of the recently adopted metropolitan system plans are available for viewing and downloading at . Paper copies http://www.metrocouncil.org/planning/framework/timeline.htm are available by calling the Council’s Data Center at 651-602-1140. Metropolitan system plans are long-range comprehensive plans for the regional systems – transportation and airports, wastewater services, and parks and open space, along with the capital budgets for metropolitan wastewater service, transportation and regional recreation open space. System statements explain the implications of metropolitan system plans for each individual community in the metropolitan area. They are intended to help communities prepare or update their comprehensive plan, as required by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act: Within three years following the receipt of the metropolitan system statement, every local governmental unit shall have prepared a comprehensive plan in accordance with sections 462.355, subdivision 4, 473.175, and 473.851 to 473.871 and the applicable planning statute and shall have submitted the plan to the Metropolitan Council for review pursuant to section 473.175. Local comprehensive plans will be reviewed by the Council for conformance with metropolitan system plans, consistency with Council policies and compatibility with adjacent and affected governmental units. The system statement includes forecasts at densities that assure regional growth is achieved consistent with adopted policies. These forecasted densities help ensure regional services and costly regional infrastructure can be provided as efficiently as possible, and that development and growth within the metropolitan area occur in a coordinated manner. The system statement also contains an overview of the transportation and aviation, transit, wastewater, and regional parks system plan updates, and system changes affecting each community. Forecasts. The following forecasts are part of the 2030 Regional Development Framework (adopted January 14, 2004 and updated on August 24, 2005). They are used by the Council to plan for its regional systems. Communities should base their planning work on these forecasts. However, given the nature of long-range forecasting, the Council will maintain an on- going dialogue with communities to consider any changes in growth trends or community expectations about growth that may have an impact on regional systems. Forecast of population, households and employment: Revised Development Framework 19902000 20102020 2030 Population 11,732 20,32127,50034,500 38,000 Households 4,016 6,91410,20012,800 14,800 Employment 6,105 8,50113,00015,200 15,600 The Council forecasts growth at appropriate densities for communities in order to protect the efficiency of wastewater, transportation and other regional system investments, and to help ensure the metropolitan area can accommodate its projected growth by the year 2030. Growth management. The Regional Development Framework sets an overall minimum residential density standard of 3 to 5 units per acre in developed and developing areas where urban service is located or planned. The average minimum standard of 3 units per acre is important to the efficient use of regional systems, including wastewater system investments. Communities that significantly over-utilize or under-utilize regional systems can cause inefficiencies in the use of regional resources. Additionally, achieving housing at these density levels may help communities meet their obligations under the Metropolitan Land Planning Act to plan to and address their housing needs. Geographic planning area. The city of Chanhassen is designated as a “developing community” geographic planning area in the 2030 Regional Development Framework. Geographic planning areas are shown on the 2030 Planning Area map. The planning area sets overall densities that the planned development patterns in your community can be expected to achieve. (If there are discrepancies between the 2030 Framework Planning Area map, and the metropolitan systems plans because of adjustments that occurred subsequent to the adoption of the 2030 Regional Development Framework document, communities should follow the specific guidance contained in this system statement.) As Chanhassen plans for current and future residents, it should focus on protecting natural resources, ensuring sufficient public infrastructure, and developing transition strategies to increase density and encourage infill development. Developing communities are also encouraged to preserve areas for post-2030 growth, where appropriate. Specific strategies for developing communities are found on page 28 of the 2030 Regional Development Framework. 2 System statement review process. If your community disagrees with elements of this system statement, or has any questions about this system statement, we urge you to contact your sector representative, Tom Caswell, 651 602-1319, to review and discuss potential issues or concerns. The Council and local units and districts have historically resolved questions about forecasts and other components of the system statement through discussions. Request for hearing. If a local governmental unit or school district and the Council are unable to resolve disagreements over the content of a system statement, the unit or district may by resolution request that a hearing be conducted by the Council’s Land Use Advisory Committee or by the state Office of Administrative Hearings for the purpose of considering amendments to the system statement. According to Minnesota Statutes section 473.857, the request shall be made by the local unit or district within 60 days after receipt of the system statement. If no request for a hearing is received by the Council within 60 days, the statement becomes final. System statement issue date: The official date of the issuance of this system statement is September 12, 2005. 3 Transportation System Statement-- Chanhassen Key Changes in the Plan Ì¸» ®»ª·»¼ ¿¼±°¬»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» Ó»¬®±°±´·¬¿² Ý±«²½·´ ·² Ü»½»³¾»® îððìô Transportation Policy Plan · ¬¸» ³»¬®±°±´·¬¿² §¬»³ °´¿² º±® ¿·®°±®¬ ¿²¼ ¬®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±² ©·¬¸ ©¸·½¸ ´±½¿´ ½±³°®»¸»²·ª» °´¿² ³«¬ ½±²º±®³ò Ì¸· §¬»³ ¬¿¬»³»²¬ «³³¿®·¦» ·¹²·º·½¿²¬ »´»³»²¬ ±º ¬¸» ³»¬®±°±´·¬¿² §¬»³ °´¿² ¿²¼ ¸·¹¸´·¹¸¬ ¬¸±» »´»³»²¬ ¬¸¿¬ ¿°°´§ °»½·º·½¿´´§ ¬± §±«® ½±³³«²·¬§ò ×² ¿¼¼·¬·±² ¬± ®»ª·»©·²¹ ¬¸· §¬»³ ¬¿¬»³»²¬ô §±«® ½±³³«²·¬§ ¸±«´¼ ½±²«´¬ ¬¸» »²¬·®» Transportation ô ¬¸» ¿²¼ ±¬¸»® °»®¬·²»²¬ ®»¹·±²¿´ °´¿²²·²¹ Policy Plan2030 Regional Development Framework ¿²¼ °±´·½§ ¼±½«³»²¬ô ·²½´«¼·²¹ ¬¸» ô ¬± »²«®» §±«® ½±³³«²·¬§? ´±½¿´ Aviation Policy Plan ½±³°®»¸»²·ª» °´¿² ¿²¼ °´¿² ¿³»²¼³»²¬ ½±²º±®³ ¬± ¬¸» ³»¬®±°±´·¬¿² §¬»³ °´¿²ò ß ÐÜÚ º·´» ±º ¬¸» »²¬·®» ®»ª·»¼ ô ¬¸» Transportation Policy Plan2030 Regional Development ô ¬¸» ¿²¼ ±¬¸»® ®»¹·±²¿´ °´¿²²·²¹ ¿²¼ °±´·½§ ¼±½«³»²¬ ±º FrameworkLocal Planning Handbook ¬¸» Ó»¬®±°±´·¬¿² Ý±«²½·´ ¿®» ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» ±²´·²» ¿¬ ¬¸» Ó»¬®±°±´·¬¿² Ý±«²½·´? É»¾ ·¬»æ ¸¬¬°æññ©©©ò³»¬®±½±«²½·´ò±®¹ñ°´¿²²·²¹ñº®¿³»©±®µñ¬·³»´·²»ò¸¬³ò Ì¸» ô Aviation Policy Plan ¿¼±°¬»¼ ·² ïççêô · ²±¬ ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» »´»½¬®±²·½¿´´§ô ¾«¬ ¿ ½±°§ ½¿² ¾» ±¾¬¿·²»¼ ¾§ ½±²¬¿½¬·²¹ ¬¸» Ó»¬®±°±´·¬¿² Ý±«²½·´? Ü¿¬¿ Ý»²¬»® ¿¬ êëïóêðîóïïìðò Ì¸» ®»ª·»¼ ·²½±®°±®¿¬» ¬¸» º±´´±©·²¹ ½¸¿²¹»æ Transportation Policy Plan ÿþ Ì¸» °´¿²²·²¹ °»®·±¼ ¸¿ ¾»»² »¨¬»²¼»¼ º®±³ îðîë ¬± îðíð ÿþ Ò± ·¹²·º·½¿²¬ ·²½®»¿» ·² ¬¸» ´»ª»´ ±º ¬®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±² º«²¼·²¹ ©¿ ¿«³»¼ò ÿþ Ì¸» »¨°»²¼·¬«®» ¸±©² ·² ¬¸» ³«¬ ¾» ½±²¬®¿·²»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» ´»ª»´ Transportation Policy Plan ±º º«²¼·²¹ ¬¸¿¬ · ¿²¬·½·°¿¬»¼ò Ø±©»ª»®ô ¬¸» ®»ª·»¼ °´¿² ¿´± »¨¿³·²»¼ ¬©± ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ½»²¿®·± ? ©¸¿¬ ½±«´¼ ¾» ¾«·´¬ ·º ¸·¹¸©¿§ ®»ª»²«» ©»®» ·²½®»¿»¼ ¾§ íðû ±ª»® ¬¸» ²»¨¬ îë §»¿®ô ¿²¼ ©¸¿¬ ·¬ ©±«´¼ ½±¬ ¬± °®±ª·¼» »²±«¹¸ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ½¿°¿½·¬§ ¬± ¸±´¼ ½±²¹»¬·±² ¬± ¬¸» ïççè ´»ª»´ò ÿþ Ì¸» ¸·¹¸©¿§ »¨°¿²·±² °®±¶»½¬ ¸±©² ·² ¬¸» °´¿² ¸¿ª» ½¸¿²¹»¼ ´·¬¬´» ·²½» ¬¸» îððï °´¿²ô ¼«» ¬± ¬¸· ´¿½µ ±º ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ®»±«®½»ò øÍ»» Ú·¹ ìóïï º±® ¸·¹¸©¿§ »¨°¿²·±² °®±°±¿´ò÷ Ó»¬®±°±´·¬¿² Ø·¹¸©¿§ Í§¬»³ Ð´¿² ·²ª»¬³»²¬ °®·±®·¬·» ²± ´±²¹»® ½±²¬¿·² ¬¸» ×³°®±ª»³»²¬? ½¿¬»¹±®§ò Ó±¬ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬ ½±®®·¼±® ¿®» ²±© ¼»·¹²¿¬»¼ Ó¿²¿¹»³»²¬? ½±®®·¼±®ò ÿþ Ì¸» ²»© ·²ª»¬³»²¬ ¬·³·²¹ °®±ª··±² ¿®» ½±²¬¿·²»¼ ·² ¬¸» Ð´¿²ò Ì¿¾´» ìóïï ½±²¬¿·² °®±¶»½¬ ·² Ó²ñÜÑÌ? Ø·¹¸©¿§ É±®µ Ð´¿² ø½¸»¼«´»¼ ·² îððçóîðïí÷ ½±²¬®«½¬·±²ô ®»½±²¬®«½¬·±²ô ¿²¼ ¾®·¼¹» ®»°´¿½»³»²¬ ¹®»¿¬»® üïð ³·´´·±²ò Ì¿¾´» ìóïî ½±²¬¿·² Î»¹·±²¿´ Ð®·±®·¬§ Ð®±¶»½¬ ¬± ³±ª» ·²¬± ¬¸» ïðóÇ»¿® Ø·¹¸©¿§ É±®µ Ð´¿²ô ·º ¬¸»®» ¿®» ®»±«®½» ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» ·² ¬¸» îððëóîððç ¬·³» °»®·±¼ò ÿþ Ú«²¼ ¸¿ª» ¿´± ¾»»² ¿´´±½¿¬»¼ ¬± ±¾¬¿·² ®·¹¸¬ ±º ©¿§ º±® ²»© ½®±·²¹ ±º ¬¸» Ó···°°· Î·ª»® ¾»¬©»»² ÒÉ Ø»²²»°·² ¿²¼ ß²±µ¿ Ý±«²¬·» ¿²¼ ±º ¬¸» Ó·²²»±¬¿ Î·ª»® ·² ¬¸» ª·½·²·¬§ ±º Ý¸¿µ¿ò Ý±²¬®«½¬·±² ¼±´´¿® º±® ¬¸»» °®±¶»½¬ ¿®» ²±¬ º±®»»»² ¾»º±®» îðíðò ÿþ Ý¸¿°¬»® ë ½±²¬¿·² ²»© °±´·½·» ¿²¼ °®±½»¼«®» ±² ³¿²¿¹·²¹ ¬¸» ½±°»ô ½±¬ ¿²¼ ®»ª»²«» ±«®½» ±º °®±¶»½¬ ¬± ·²«®» ¬¸¿¬ «ºº·½·»²¬ ®»±«®½» ¿®» ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» ¬± ·³°´»³»²¬ ¬¸» ®»¹·±²? ¬®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±² °®·±®·¬·» ¿ ¸±©² ·² ¬¸· °´¿²ò Ì¸· ·²½´«¼» °®±½»¼«®» ¬± ³¿²¿¹» ¬¸» «» ±º Ìóï Ú»¼»®¿´ Ø·¹¸ Ð®·±®·¬§ Ð®±¶»½¬ øØÐÐ÷ º«²¼ ¿²¼ ³¿¬½¸·²¹ º«²¼ º±® ¬¸»» º»¼»®¿´ ¼±´´¿®ò Ì¸» Ý±«²½·´ ¿²¼ Ó²ñÜÑÌ ©·´´ ³±²·¬±® ½±°» ¿²¼ ½±¬ ¬± »²«®» ³¿¶±® °®±¶»½¬ ½±²¬·²«» ¬± ³»»¬ ®»¹·±²¿´ ±¾¶»½¬·ª» ·² ¿ ½±¬ »ºº»½¬·ª» ³¿²²»®ò ÿþ Ì¸» °´¿² »²ª··±² ·¹²·º·½¿²¬ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬ ·² ¬¸» ¾« §¬»³ô ·²½´«¼·²¹ ²»© »¨°®» ¾« ®±«¬»ô ¿®¬»®·¿´ ½±®®·¼±® »²¸¿²½»³»²¬ô «¾«®¾ó¬±ó«¾«®¾ »®ª·½»ô ¬®¿²·¬ ¬¿¬·±²ô °¿®µó¿²¼ó ®·¼» ´±¬ ¿²¼ ±¬¸»® º»¿¬«®»ò Ì¸» ¹±¿´ · ¬± ·²½®»¿» ¬®¿²·¬ ®·¼»®¸·° ëð °»®½»²¬ ¾§ îðîð ¿²¼ ¼±«¾´» ·¬ ¾§ îðíðò ÿþ Ì¸» °´¿² °®±°±» ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ »¨°®» ½±³³«¬»® ¾« ½±®®·¼±® ¿ ©»´´ ¿ »²¸¿²½»³»²¬ ¿²¼ »¨°¿²·±² ±º »¨·¬·²¹ ¾« »®ª·½» ·² º®»»©¿§ ½±®®·¼±®ò É·¬¸·² »¿½¸ ½±®®·¼±®ô »¨°®» ¾« ®±«¬» ©·´´ ¾» «°°±®¬»¼ ¾§ °¿®µó¿²¼ó®·¼» º¿½·´·¬·»ô ½·®½«´¿¬±® ²»¬©±®µô ¿²¼ ¬®¿²·¬ ¿¼ª¿²¬¿¹»ò? ÿþ Ì¸» °´¿² ·²½´«¼» ½±²¬®«½¬·±² ±º º·ª» ²»© ¬®¿²·¬©¿§? ±² ¼»¼·½¿¬»¼ ®·¹¸¬ó±ºó©¿§ ¾§ îðîð ¬± ¸»´° ´±© ¬¸» ¹®±©¬¸ ·² ¬®¿ºº·½ ½±²¹»¬·±² ¿²¼ ·³°®±ª» ³±¾·´·¬§ô ¿²¼ ¬¸®»» ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ¬®¿²·¬©¿§ ¾§ îðíðò Ë²´·µ» ¬¸» îððï °´¿²ô ¬¸» ¬»½¸²±´±¹§ º±® »¿½¸ ½±®®·¼±® ©¿ ²±¬ ·¼»²¬·º·»¼ ·² ¬¸» Ð´¿²å ®¿¬¸»® ¬¸» ³±¬ ¿°°®±°®·¿¬» ¿²¼ ½±¬ó»ºº»½¬·ª» ³±¼» º±® ¿²§ ¹·ª»² ½±®®·¼±® · ¾»¬ ¼»¬»®³·²»¼ ¿º¬»® »¨¬»²·ª» ¬«¼§ ±º ¬¸» ·²¼·ª·¼«¿´ ½±®®·¼±®ò Ú·¹«®» ìóî ø¿¬¬¿½¸»¼÷ ¸±© ¬¸» îðíð Ì®¿²·¬©¿§ Í§¬»³ ¿²¼ Û¨°®» Ý±³³«¬»® Þ« Í§¬»³ò ÿþ Ì¸» °´¿² ²±© ·²½´«¼» ¼»¬¿·´»¼ ·²º±®³¿¬·±² ±² ¬¸» º¿½·´·¬·» ²»»¼»¼ º±® ¬®¿²·¬ °¿»²¹»®ô «½¸ ¿ ¬¿¬·±² ¿²¼ °¿®µ ¿²¼ ®·¼» ´±¬ô ¿ ©»´´ ¿ º¿½·´·¬·» ²»»¼»¼ ¬± «°°±®¬ ¬¸» ¬®¿²·¬ §¬»³ô «½¸ ¿ ¹¿®¿¹» ¿²¼ ¾« ´¿§±ª»® ·¬» øÚ·¹«®» ìóë ¿²¼ ìóê÷ò Ý±³³«²·¬·» ¸±«´¼ °´¿² º±® ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ¿²¼ ®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ¿®±«²¼ ¬¿¬·±² ¿²¼ °¿®µó¿²¼ó®·¼» ´±¬ò ÿþ Ð±´·½§ ïè ø°®»ª·±«´§ °±´·½§ ïé÷ ±² ¬®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ´¿²¼ «» »´»³»²¬ ·² ´±½¿´ ½±³°®»¸»²·ª» °´¿² ©¿ ®»©®·¬¬»² ¿²¼ ³±®» ¼»¬¿·´ °®±ª·¼»¼ ·² ±³» ¬®¿¬»¹·» ¿ ¬± ©¸¿¬ ¬¸» Ý±«²½·´ »¨°»½¬ ·² ´±½¿´ ½±³°®»¸»²·ª» °´¿²ò ÿþ Ì¸» ÌÐÐ ²±© ·²½´«¼» ®»º»®»²½» ¬± ¬¸» ®»¹·±²¿´ ¿ª·¿¬·±² §¬»³ ¿ ¼»º·²»¼ ·² ¬¸» Aviation ò Ì¸» ïççê ßª·¿¬·±² Ð±´·½§ Ð´¿² ®»³¿·² ·² »ºº»½¬ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» »¨½»°¬·±² ±º ¬¸» Policy PlanLand Ì¸»» ¹«·¼»´·²» ¸¿ª» ¾»»² «°¼¿¬»¼ ¿²¼ Use Compatibility Guidelines for Aircraft Noise. ·²½´«¼»¼ ·² ¬¸» ÌÐÐ ¿ ß°°»²¼·¨ Øò System Plan Considerations Affecting Your Community 1. Metropolitan Highways ÿþ Ó»¬®±°±´·¬¿² ¸·¹¸©¿§ ¿²¼ ®»¹·±²¿´ ¸·¹¸©¿§ ·²ª»¬³»²¬ °®·±®·¬·» º±® îðíð ¿®» ¸±©² ·² Ú·¹«®» ìóïïò Ì¸» ½·¬§ ¸±«´¼ ®»º»® ¬± Ì¿¾´» ìóç ¬¸®±«¹¸ ìóïî º±® ³¿¶±® ¸·¹¸©¿§ °®±¶»½¬ ¿²¼ °®±°±»¼ ¬·³·²¹ò Ì¸» ±²´§ ³»¬®±°±´·¬¿² ¸·¹¸©¿§ ´±½¿¬»¼ ©·¬¸·² Ý¸¿²¸¿»² · ÌØ îïî ¿²¼ ²»© ÌØ îïîô ¬¸» »¨·¬·²¹ ÌØ îïî ©·´´ ¾»½±³» ¿ ³·²±® ¿®¬»®·¿´ò 2. Transit Routes and Facilities Ý¸¿²¸¿»² · ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» Ó»¬®±°±´·¬¿² Ì®¿²·¬ Ì¿¨·²¹ Ü·¬®·½¬ò Ý¸¿²¸¿»² · ©·¬¸·² Ó¿®µ»¬ ß®»¿ ×××ò Í»®ª·½» ±°¬·±² º±® Ó¿®µ»¬ ß®»¿ ××× ·²½´«¼» °»¿µó±²´§ »¨°®»ô ³¿´´ ª»¸·½´» ½·®½«´¿¬±®ô ³·¼¼¿§ ½·®½«´¿¬±®ô °»½·¿´ ²»»¼ °¿®¿¬®¿²·¬ øßÜßô »²·±®÷ô ¿²¼ ®·¼»¸¿®·²¹ò Ìóî Ý¸¿²¸¿»² ¸±«´¼ ·¼»²¬·º§ »¨·¬·²¹ ¬®¿²·¬ »®ª·½» ø¿ª¿·´¿¾´» ±² ¬¸» Ý±«²½·´? ©»¾·¬»÷ ¿²¼ ¼»·®»¼ º«¬«®» ¬®¿²·¬ »®ª·½» ±°¬·±² ½±²·¬»²¬ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±² Ð±´·½§ Ð´¿²? ¬®¿²·¬ §¬»³ »®ª·½» ¿®»¿ øÌ¿¾´» ìóï ¿²¼ ß°°»²¼·¨ Ó÷ò Î»¹«´¿® ®±«¬» ¬®¿²·¬ »®ª·½» · °®±ª·¼»¼ ¾§ Í±«¬¸©»¬ Ó»¬®± Ì®¿²·¬ò Ü·¿´ó¿ó®·¼» »®ª·½» · °®±ª·¼»¼ ¾§ Ý¿®ª»® ß®»¿ Î«®¿´ Ì®¿²·¬ò Ý¸¿²¸¿»² ¸±«´¼ ´·¬ ¬®¿²·¬ ½±®®·¼±® ø»¨°®» ½±³³«¬»® ¾« ½±®®·¼±® ¿²¼ ¼»¼·½¿¬»¼ ®·¹¸¬ó±ºó ©¿§ ½±®®·¼±®÷ ¿²¼ ·¼»²¬·º§ ±°°±®¬«²·¬·» ¬± °®±³±¬» ¸·¹¸»® ¼»²·¬§ ·²·¬·¿¬·ª» ¿´±²¹ ¼»¼·½¿¬»¼ ¬®¿²·¬ ½±®®·¼±® ø»» Ú·¹«®» ìóî÷ò Ý¸¿²¸¿»² ¸±«´¼ ·¼»²¬·º§ »¨·¬·²¹ ¬®¿²·¬ °¿»²¹»® ¿²¼ «°°±®¬ º¿½·´·¬·» ¿²¼ º«¬«®» ·³°®±ª»³»²¬ ¬± ¿²¼ »¨°¿²·±² ±º ¬¸»» º¿½·´·¬·»ò Ð¿»²¹»® ¿²¼ «°°±®¬ º¿½·´·¬·» ·²½´«¼» ¸»´¬»®ô ¬®¿²·¬ ½»²¬»®ô ¬¿¬·±²ô ¿²¼ °¿®µó¿²¼ó®·¼» ´±¬ò Ð¿®µó¿²¼ó®·¼» ´±¬ ¿®» ´±½¿¬»¼ ¿¬ Ó¿®µ»¬ Þ±«´»ª¿®¼ ú Ð¿«´»§ Î±¿¼ ¿²¼ ÌØ ïðï ú ÌØ îïîô ©¸·½¸ · °®±¹®¿³³»¼ º±® ®»°´¿½»³»²¬ò 3. Aviation Plan and Facilities Ì¸» ÌÐÐñßÐÐ ·²½´«¼» °±´·½·» ¿²¼ ¬»¨¬ ±² °®±¬»½¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ®»¹·±²ù ¿·®°¿½» ®»±«®½»ò Ì¸» ¿·®°¿½» °±´·½§ ¬¿¬» ¬¸¿¬ ¾±¬¸ Ú»¼»®¿´ ßª·¿¬·±² ¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±² øÚßß÷ ¿²¼ Ó²ÜÑÌ ß»®±²¿«¬·½ ¿º»¬§ ¬¿²¼¿®¼ ³«¬ ¾» ¿ ³¿¶±® ½±²·¼»®¿¬·±² ·² ¬¸» °´¿²²·²¹ô ¼»·¹²ô ³¿·²¬»²¿²½» ¿²¼ ±°»®¿¬·±² ±º ¿·® ¬®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±² º¿½·´·¬·» ¿²¼ »®ª·½»ò Ì¸»®» ¿®» ²± »¨·¬·²¹ ±® °´¿²²»¼ ¿ª·¿¬·±² º¿½·´·¬·» ©·¬¸·² Ý¸¿²¸¿»²ò Ø±©»ª»®ô »¿½¸ ½±³³«²·¬§ ¸¿ ¿ ®»°±²·¾·´·¬§ ¬± ·²½´«¼» ¿·®°¿½» °®±¬»½¬·±² ·² ·¬ ½±³°®»¸»²·ª» °´¿²ò Ì¸» °®±¬»½¬·±² · º±® °±¬»²¬·¿´ ¸¿¦¿®¼ ¬± ¿·® ²¿ª·¹¿¬·±² ·²½´«¼·²¹ »´»½¬®±²·½ ·²¬»®º»®»²½»ò ß·®°¿½» °®±¬»½¬·±² ¸±«´¼ ¾» ·²½´«¼»¼ ·² ´±½¿´ ½±¼»ñ±®¼·²¿²½» ¬± ½±²¬®±´ ¸»·¹¸¬ ±º ¬®«½¬«®»ô »°»½·¿´´§ ©¸»² ½±²¼·¬·±²¿´ «» °»®³·¬ ©±«´¼ ¿°°´§ò Ì¸» ½±³°®»¸»²·ª» °´¿² ¸±«´¼ ·²½´«¼» °±´·½§ñ¬»¨¬ ±² ¿ notification to the FAA ¼»º·²»¼ «²¼»® ½±¼» ±º º»¼»®¿´ ®»¹«´¿¬·±² ÝÚÎ ó Ð¿®¬ ééô «·²¹ ¬¸» Úßß Ú±®³ éìêðóï þÒ±¬·½» ±º Ð®±°±»¼ Ý±²¬®«½¬·±² ±® ß´¬»®¿¬·±²þò ×²¬®«½¬·±² ½¿² ¾» º±«²¼ ¿¬ ©©©òº¿¿ò¹±ªñ¿®°ñ¿½»ñ°¿®¬ééò½º³ò Ú´§·²¹ ·² ¬¸» ³»¬®± ®»¹·±² ·²ª±´ª» ¿´´ ¬§°» ±º ¿·®½®¿º¬ ·²½´«¼·²¹ ¿³°¸·¾·¿² ¿²¼ º´±¿¬ó»¯«·°°»¼ °´¿²»ò Ý±³³«²·¬·» ¸±«´¼ ®»½±¹²·¦»ô º±® °«®°±» ±º ¿º» «» ±º «®º¿½» ©¿¬»® ¿²¼ ½±³°¿¬·¾´» ´¿²¼ «»ô ¬¸¿¬ ½»®¬¿·² °«¾´·½ ©¿¬»® ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» »ª»²ó½±«²¬§ ³»¬®± ¿®»¿ ¿®» ¼»·¹²¿¬»¼ ¾§ Ó²ÜÑÌ ß»®±²¿«¬·½ ¿ °»®³·¬¬»¼ »¿°´¿²» «» ¿®»¿ «²¼»® ¬¿¬» Î«´»ò Ú±® ¿ ´·¬·²¹ ±º ¿«¬¸±®·¦»¼ ±°»®¿¬·²¹ ¿®»¿ ¿²¼ ±¬¸»® ®»´»ª¿²¬ ·²º±®³¿¬·±² °´»¿» ®»º»® ¬± ¬¸» º±´´±©·²¹ ©»¾ ·¬»æ ¸¬¬°æññ©©©ò®»ª·±®ò´»¹ò¬¿¬»ò³²ò«ñ¿®«´»ñèèððñîèððò¸¬³´ò Ìóí Figure 4-2 2030 Transitway Corridors Ìóì Figure 4-5 Transit Passenger Facilities Ìóë Figure 4-6 Transit Support Facilities Ìóê Figure 4-11 2030 Constrained Metropolitan Highway System Plan Investment Priorities Ìóé Table 4-1 Transit Market Area Features and Improvements MarketLand Use Pattern Service Options Service Characteristics Areas ëóïë ³·²«¬» ´±½¿´ ¿²¼ Frequencies: × Ø·¹¸»¬ ½±²½»²óÎ»¹«´¿®ó®±«¬» ´±½¿´ô ¿´´ó ½·®½«´¿¬±® ¬®¿¬·±² ±º ¿½¬·ª·¬§ô ¼¿§ »¨°®»»ô °»½·¿´ ¸±«·²¹ ¿²¼ ¶±¾ ²»»¼ °¿®¿¬®¿²·¬ øßÜßô ïèóîì ¸±«®ô é Span of Service: »²·±®ô÷ ®·¼»¸¿®·²¹ ¼¿§ °»® ©»»µ Ô±½¿´ °¿½»¼ ðòîëóðòë ³·´» Access: ¿°¿®¬ ©·¬¸ èóïð ¾« ¬±° °»® ³·´» ×× Ó±¼»®¿¬» ½±²½»²óÎ»¹«´¿®ó®±«¬» ´±½¿´ô ¿´´óïëóíð ³·²«¬» ±® íðóêð Frequencies: ¬®¿¬·±² ±º ¶±¾ô ¼¿§ »¨°®»»ô ³¿´´ó³·²«¬» ¼»°»²¼·²¹ ±² ´¿²¼ «» ¸±«·²¹ ¿²¼ ª»¸·½´» ½·®½«´¿¬±®ô °»½·¿´ °¿¬¬»®² ¿½¬·ª·¬·» ²»»¼ °¿®¿¬®¿²·¬ øßÜßô ïîóîð ¸±«® °»® Span of Service: »²·±®ô÷ô ®·¼»¸¿®·²¹ ¼¿§ô é ¼¿§ °»® ©»»µ Ô±½¿´ °¿½»¼ ðòëóïòð ³·´» Access: ¿°¿®¬ ©·¬¸ êóè ¾« ¬±° °»® ³·´» ××× Ù»²»®¿´´§ ´±©»® Ð»¿µó±²´§ »¨°®»ô ³¿´´ Ð»¿µó°»®·±¼ó±²´§ Frequencies: ½±²½»²¬®¿¬·±² ©·¬¸ ª»¸·½´» ¼·¿´ó¿ó®·¼»ô ³·¼¼¿§ »¨°®»»ô ïóî ¸±«® ³·¼¼¿§ ·²¬»®³·¬¬»²¬ °±½µ»¬ ½·®½«´¿¬±®ô °»½·¿´ ²»»¼ º®»¯«»²½·»ô ¼·¿´ó¿ó®·¼» ¿¼ª¿²½» ±º ³±¼»®¿¬» °¿®¿¬®¿²·¬ øßÜßô ®»¹·¬®¿¬·±² ½±²½»²¬®¿¬·±² »²·±®ô÷ô ®·¼»¸¿®·²¹ ïðóïì ¸±«® °»® Span of Service: ø°±½µ»¬ ©±«´¼ ¼¿§ô ©»»µ¼¿§ ¿²¼ ´·³·¬»¼ ®»½»·ª» ¸·¹¸»¬ ©»»µ»²¼ »®ª·½» ´»ª»´÷ Í»®ª·½» ¬·»¼ ¬± °¿®µó¿²¼ó Access: ®·¼» ´±¬ ¿²¼ ¸«¾ ×Ê Ô±©»¬ Ü·¿´ó¿ó®·¼»ô ª±´«²¬»»® ß ²»»¼»¼ Frequencies: ½±²½»²¬®¿¬·±² ±º ¼®·ª»® °®±¹®¿³ô èóïð ¸±«® °»® Span of Service: ¸±«·²¹ ¿²¼ ¶±¾ ®·¼»¸¿®·²¹ ¼¿§ô ©»»µ¼¿§ Í»®ª·½» ¬·»¼ ¬± °¿®µó¿²¼ó Spacing: ®·¼» ¿²¼ °¿®µó¿²¼ó°±±´ ´±¬ Ìóè Appendix M. Regional Transit Standards Transit Market Areas While several factors influence the propensity to use transit, the primary predictors of transit productivity are density of origination and destination. There are four categories of transit markets in the metropolitan area. Transit markets in the Twin Cities are identified using four primary criteria: 1) population density, 2) employment concentration and job density, 3) trip volumes and patterns, and 4) transit dependent segments of the population. Different types and levels of transit services should be used for each transit market area. The region has four distinct market areas. Transit Market Area I has the highest density of population and employment, and is able to effectively support frequent regular route transit service. Because this is the most productive transit service area in the region, it should also be the area that receives a prioritized investment of transit resources. Transit Market Area Area Characteristics ß®»¿ × Ð±°«´¿¬·±² Ü»²·¬§ ã ïë ±® ³±®» °»®±²ñ¿½®» (or) Ö±¾ Ü»²·¬§ ã ëð ±® ³±®» ¶±¾ñ¿½®» ¿²¼ ïðôððð ³±®» ½±²¬·¹«±« ¶±¾ ß®»¿ ×× Ð±°«´¿¬·±² Ü»²·¬§ ã ç ¬± ïìòç °»®±²ñ¿½®» ¿«¹³»²¬»¼ ¾§ ½±²¬·¹«±« Ø·¹¸ Ì®¿²·¬ Ü»°»²¼»²½§ ¿®»¿ ß®»¿ ××× Ð±°«´¿¬·±² Ü»²·¬§ ã ë ¬± èòç °»®±²ñ¿½®» ø»¨½´«¼·²¹ ·±´¿¬»¼ °±½µ»¬÷ ¿«¹³»²¬»¼ ¾§æ ø¿÷ Ý±²¬·¹«±« ¿®»¿ ©·¬¸ Ö±¾ Ü»²·¬§ ã ïð ¬± ìç ¶±¾ñ¿½®» ¿²¼ íôððð ±® ³±®» ½±²¬·¹«±« ¶±¾ Or ø¾÷ Ý±²¬·¹«±« ¿®»¿ ©·¬¸ Ó¿¶±® Ì®¿ª»´ ¼»¬·²¿¬·±²æ ëð ±® ³±®» ²±²ó¸±³» ¾±«²¼ ¬®·°ñ¿½®» ß®»¿ ×Ê Ð±°«´¿¬·±² Ü»²·¬§ ´» ¬¸¿² ë °»®±²ñ¿½®» Ð±½µ»¬ ß®»¿ ³»»¬·²¹ ¿¬ ´»¿¬ ±²» ±º ¬¸» º±´´±©·²¹æ ïò Ð±°«´¿¬·±² Ü»²·¬§ ã ³±®» ¬¸¿² ë °»®±²ñ¿½®» ø·±´¿¬»¼ °±½µ»¬ ±²´§÷ îò Ö±¾ Ü»²·¬§ ã ïð ¬± ìç ¶±¾ñ¿½®» ¿²¼ íôððð ±® ³±®» ½±²¬·¹«±« ¶±¾ ø·±´¿¬»¼ °±½µ»¬ ±²´§÷ íò Ó¿¶±® Ì®¿ª»´ ¼»¬·²¿¬·±²æ ëð ±® ³±®» ²±²ó¸±³» ¾±«²¼ ¬®·°ñ¿½®» ø·±´¿¬»¼ °±½µ»¬ ±²´§÷ ìò Ø·¹¸ Ì®¿²·¬ Ü»°»²¼»²½§ ¿®»¿ ø·±´¿¬»¼ °±½µ»¬ ±²´§÷ Transit Market Area II has high to moderate population and employment densities yielding a market area that is conducive to regular route operations and also other forms of transit service delivery. Ì¸» ´±©»® °±°«´¿¬·±² ¿²¼ »³°´±§³»²¬ ¼»²·¬·» ±º Ì®¿²·¬ Ó¿®µ»¬ ß®»¿ ×××ô ×Êô ¿²¼ Ð±½µ»¬ ¿®»¿ ·²½®»¿» ¬¸» ½±³°´»¨·¬§ ¿²¼ ½¸¿´´»²¹» ±º ³¿¬½¸·²¹ ¬®¿²·¬ »®ª·½» ¬± ¬®¿²·¬ ²»»¼ò Ü«» ¬± ¬¸» ´±©»® ½±²½»²¬®¿¬»¼ ¼»³¿²¼ô ·¬ ¾»½±³» ³±®» ¼·ºº·½«´¬ ¬± °®±ª·¼» »ºº·½·»²¬ ¬®¿²·¬ »®ª·½» ¿¬ ®»¿±²¿¾´» ½±¬ ·² ¬¸»» ¿®»¿ò ×² ¬¸» ´±²¹»® ¬»®³ ¬± ³»»¬ ¬®¿²·¬ ²»»¼ ·² «¾«®¾¿² ¿²¼ ®«®¿´ »¬¬·²¹ô ©» ²»»¼ ¬± °®±³±¬» ¬¸» ®·¹¸¬ ¬§°» ±º ´¿²¼ «» ¿²¼ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ¼»²·¬·» ¬¸¿¬ ½¿² «¬¿·² ¬®¿²·¬ ±°»®¿¬·±²ò Ìóç Transit Markets/Service Options Ì¸» ¬¿¾´» ¾»´±© ·¼»²¬·º·» ¬®¿²·¬ ¬®¿¬»¹·» ¬¸¿¬ ¿°°»¿® ¬± ¾» ³±¬ ¿°°®±°®·¿¬» º±® ¬¸» ¼·ºº»®»²¬ ¬®¿²·¬ ³¿®µ»¬ ¬¸¿¬ ¿®» ·² ¬¸» ³»¬®±°±´·¬¿² ¿®»¿ò Ì¸» »®ª·½» ¼»´·ª»®§ ¬®¿¬»¹·» °®»»²¬»¼ ¿®» ±²´§ ·´´«¬®¿¬·ª» ¿²¼ ²±¬ »¨¸¿«¬·ª»ò Ü»¬¿·´»¼ ¿²¿´§· ±º °»½·º·½ ½±³³«²·¬·» ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» ³»¬®±°±´·¬¿² ¿®»¿ ³¿§ ¹»²»®¿¬» ±¬¸»® ½®»¿¬·ª» ³»¿² ±º ¼»´·ª»®·²¹ »ºº»½¬·ª» ¬®¿²·¬ »®ª·½»ò Suggested Service Type TransitSuggested Service Characteristics Market Area ß®»¿ × Ð®·³¿®§ »³°¸¿· ±² ¾·¹ ¾«ñ®»¹«´¿® ®±«¬» ? Ú±½« ±² ¾±¬¸ ÝÞÜ? Orientation »®ª·½» ½±³°´»³»²¬»¼ ¾§ °¿®¿¬®¿²·¬ ? Ë° ¬± îì ¸±«®ñ¼¿§ ¿²¼ é Availability »®ª·½»ò Ü±©²¬±©² ¿®»¿ ½·®½«´¿¬±® ¼¿§ñ©»»µ °±·¾´»ò ? Î±«¬» °¿½·²¹ øòîë ? òëð ³·´»÷ Access ©·¬¸ èóïð ¾« ¬±° °»® ³·´» ? Ù»²»®¿´´§ ë ? ïë ³·²«¬» Frequency ß®»¿ ×× Ð®·³¿®§ »³°¸¿· ±² ¾·¹ ¾«ñ®»¹«´¿® ®±«¬» ? Ô·²µ ÝÞÜ?ñ«¾«®¾¿² Orientation »®ª·½» ½±³°´»³»²¬»¼ ¾§ °¿®¿¬®¿²·¬ ¬®¿²·¬ ¬¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ½»²¬»® »®ª·½»ò Ò»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼ ½·®½«´¿¬±® ¸±«´¼ ? Ë° ¬± îð ¸±«®ñ¼¿§ ¿²¼ é Availability ¬·» ·² ©·¬¸ ´·³·¬»¼ ¬±° ®»¹«´¿® ®±«¬» ¼¿§ñ©»»µ »®ª·½»ò ? Î±«¬» °¿½·²¹ øðòë ? ïòð ³·´»÷ Access ©·¬¸ êóïð ¬±° °»® ³·´» ? Ù»²»®¿´´§ ïë ? íð ³·²«¬» Frequency ß®»¿ ××× ß ³·¨ ±º ¾·¹ ¿²¼ ³¿´´ ¾«ñ®»¹«´¿® ®±«¬» ? Ô·²µ ÝÞÜ?ñ«¾«®¾¿² Orientation ¿²¼ ½±³³«²·¬§ ½·®½«´¿¬±® »®ª·½» ¬®¿²·¬ ¬¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ½»²¬»® ½±³°´»³»²¬»¼ ¾§ °¿®¿¬®¿²·¬ »®ª·½»ò ? Ë° ¬± ïè ¸±«®ñ¼¿§ ¿²¼ Ë° Availability Ý±³³«²·¬§ ½·®½«´¿¬±® ¸±«´¼ ¬·» ·²¬± ¬± é ¼¿§ñ©»»µ ®»¹«´¿® ®±«¬» ®»¹·±²¿´ »®ª·½» ¿¬ ¿ ¬®¿²º»® ? Î±«¬» °¿½·²¹ øðòë ? ïòë ³·´»÷ Access °±·²¬ò ©·¬¸ êóïð ¬±° °»® ³·´» ? Ù»²»®¿´´§ íð ? êð ³·²«¬» Frequency ß®»¿ ×Ê Ð®·³¿®§ »³°¸¿· ±²æ ï÷ ³¿´´ ¾«ñ¼·¿´ó¿ó ? Í«¾«®¾ ¬± «¾«®¾ ¿²¼ ½»²¬®¿´ Orientation ®·¼» »®ª·½» °®±ª·¼·²¹ ½±«²¬§ ±® ®«®¿´ ½·¬·» ½·®½«´¿¬·±²ô ¿²¼ î÷ ½±³³«²·¬§ ¾« »®ª·½» ? Ð»¿µó°»®·±¼ »¨°®» ¿²¼ Availability ¬·»¼ ¬± ³¿¶±® °¿®µó¿²¼ó®·¼» º¿½·´·¬·» ¬± ³·¼¼¿§ ½·®½«´¿¬±®å ©»»µ¼¿§ ±²´§ ½®»¿¬» ¬®¿ª»´ ª±´«³»ò ? Û¨°®» ®±«¬» ¬·»¼ ¬± ³¿¶±® Access °¿®µó¿²¼ó®·¼»ñ½·®½«´¿¬±® ´·²µ ¬± ¬®¿²·¬ ¬¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ½»²¬»® ? ß¼ª¿²½» ®»¹·¬®¿¬·±² º±® ¼·¿´ó Frequency ¿ó®·¼» »®ª·½» Ð±½µ»¬ Ð®·³¿®§ »³°¸¿· ±² ï÷ ³¿´´ ¾« »®ª·½» ? Ô±½¿´·¦»¼ Orientation °®±ª·¼·²¹ ½±³³«²·¬§ ´±½¿´ ±® ¼·¿´ó¿ó®·¼» ? Ê¿®·» ¾§ °±½µ»¬å °®·³¿®·´§ Availability ½·®½«´¿¬·±²ô ¿²¼ î÷ ½±³³«¬»® ¾« »®ª·½» ©»»µ¼¿§ »®ª·½» ³¿§ ¸¿ª» ´±½¿´·¦»¼ »®ª·½» ·² ¿¼¼·¬·±² ¬± ? Ü±±®ó¬±ó¼±±® ±® ³±¼·º·»¼ Access ´·²µ·²¹ ©·¬¸ ³¿¶±® °¿®µó¿²¼ó®·¼» º¿½·´·¬·» ½·®½«´¿¬·±²å »¨°®» ®±«¬» °®·³¿®·´§ ¬·»¼ ¬± ½®»¿¬» ¬®¿ª»´ ª±´«³»ò ¬± °¿®µó¿²¼ó®·¼» º¿½·´·¬·» ? Ë° ¬± î ¸±«® º±® ½·®½«´¿¬±® Frequency »®ª·½»ò ß¼ª¿²½» ®»¹·¬®¿¬·±² º±® ¼·¿´ó¿ó ®·¼» Ìóïð Transit Performance Standards The primary performance standards to measure service are Subsidy per Passenger and Passengers per In-Service Hour. Performance standards are used to evaluate the relative productivity and efficiency of the services provided. To be responsible and dynamic, a transit system must consistently measure and adjust service in unproductive routes and address insufficient service in productive areas. The use of two regional performance standards provides better insight into the operational and financial performance of individual routes and services. Subsidy per Passenger Subsidy or net cost is the difference between the total cost of providing service offset by revenue from passenger fares. Subsidy per passenger represents the net cost divided by the number of passengers using the service. This standard identifies services that are not operating within efficiency ranges and focuses corrective actions for those services. Subsidy thresholds are determined by calculating the non-weighted subsidy per passenger average within each service classification plus fixed percentage deviations from that average. Threshold No. Level of Subsity per Possible Action Monitoring Goal Passenger Performance ï îð ¬± íëû ±ª»® °»»® ¿ª»®¿¹» Ú±® Ï«·½µ Î»ª·»© Ó·²±® Ó±¼·º·½¿¬·±² î íê ¬± êðû ±ª»® °»»® ¿ª»®¿¹» Ú±® ×²¬»²» Î»ª·»© Ó¿¶±® Ý¸¿²¹» í Ó±®» ¬¸¿² êðû ±ª»® °»»® ¿ª»®¿¹» Ú±® Í·¹²·º·½¿²¬ Ý¸¿²¹» Î»¬®«½¬«®»ñÛ´·³·²¿¬» Passengers per In-Service Hour The passenger per in-service hour standard establishes a minimum threshold of performance for light rail transit, big bus fixed route service, small bus fixed route service and paratransit operations. Passengers per in-service hour represents the total passengers carried divided by the in-service time. This measure is most often calculated at the route level, but can also be measured less rigidly at a trip level. Type of Service Average Passengers per Minimum Passengers per In-Service Hour In-Service Hour Ô·¹¸¬ Î¿·´ Ì®¿²·¬ ÿ éð ÿ ëð Þ·¹ Þ« Ú·¨»¼ Î±«¬» ? ß´´ Ü¿§ ÿ îð ÿ ïë Þ·¹ Þ« Ú·¨»¼ Î±«¬» ? Ð»¿µ Ñ²´§ ÿ îð Òñß Í³¿´´ Þ« Ú·¨»¼ Î±«¬» ÿ ç ÿ ë Í³¿´´ Þ« Ò±²óÚ·¨»¼ Î±«¬» ÿ í ÿ î Ñ¬¸»®ñÎ·¼»¸¿®»ñÍ¸¿®»¼ Î·¼» Ì¿¨· þ î Òñß Ìóïë Table 4-11 MnDOT Highway Work Plan, 2009-2013 Major Construction, Reconstruction and Bridge Replacement Greater Than $10 Million Project Cost Estimates DesignR/WYear-of-ConstructionTotal ProjectConstructionEstimateEstimateConstructionEngineeringProject Highway DescriptionProgramFiscal Year ($000)($000)EstimateEstimateCost ($000)($000)($000) íëÛ ×óçì ¬± Ó¿®§´¿²¼ ÓÝ îðïð éôêèé Ô·³·¬»¼ éêôéëë êôïìð çðôëéï ßª»ò ·² Í¬ò Ð¿«´ô ¹®¿¼·²¹ô «®º¿½·²¹ô ¾®òô »¬½òô ·²½´«¼·²¹ Ý¿§«¹¿ Þ®ò ¿²¼ Ð¸¿´»² Þ´ª¼ò ½±²²»½¬·±² íëÉ ß¬ Ô¿µ» Í¬ò ·² ÓÝ îððç ïôïêð Ý±²¬·²ó ïïôêðð çîè ïíôêèè Ó·²²»¿°±´·ô «±«ñ ®»½±²¬®«½¬ ·²¬»®ó Ó¿¶±® ½¸¿²¹» øÐ¸ò ï÷ íëÉ ß¬ Ô¿µ» Í¬ò ·² ÓÝ îðïð ïôéèë Ý±²¬·²óïéôèëð ïôìîè îïôðêí Ó·²²»¿°±´·ô «±«ñ ®»½±²¬®«½¬ ·²¬»®ó Ó¿¶±® ½¸¿²¹» øÐ¸ò î÷ íê ß¬ Ô»¨·²¹¬±² ÓÝ îððç ïôíèð Ô·³·¬»¼ ïíôèðì ïôïðì ïêôîèç ßª»òò ·² Î±»ª·´´»ô ®»°´¿½» Þ®ò ëéîí ¿²¼ ®»½±²¬®«½¬ ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹» ¬¸ ïðð íê Í¬ò ¬± Ý»¼¿® ÓÝ îðïï êôïëð Ý±²¬·²óêïôëðð ìôçîð éîôëéð Ô¿µ» Î¼ò ·² Í¬ò «±«ñ Ô±«· Ð¿®µô Ó¿¶±® ¹®¿¼·²¹ô «®º¿½·²¹ô Þ®òô »¬½ò º±® êó´¿²» º®»»©¿§ ïêç Ò»¿® ÝÍßØ ê ·² ÓÝ îðïð ïôçðì Ô·³·¬»¼ ïçôðìð ïôëîí îîòìêé Þ»´´» Ð´¿·²»ô ¹®¿¼·²¹ô «®º¿½·²¹ô Þ®òô »¬½ò º±® ²»© ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹» êçì Û ±º ×íëÉ ·² ÓÝ îðïî êôçêð Ó·²·³¿´ñêçôëçê ëôëêè èîôïîí ß®¼»² Ø·´´ ¬± Û ±º Í°±¬ Ô»¨·²¹¬±² ßª»òò ·² Í¸±®»ª·»©ô ¹®¿¼·²¹ô «®º¿½·²¹ô Þ®òô »¬½ò ¬± ¿¼¼ ¬¸·®¼ ´¿²» ¿²¼ ½±®®»½¬ ©»¿ª» ¿¬ ÌØ ïðñëï ÌÑÌßÔÍ îéôðïë îéðôïìë îïôêïï íïèôééï Ìóïê Table 4-12 Regional Priority Projects to Move into 10-Year Highway Work Plan, 2005-2009 Highway Project Description ×óíëÛ ÌØ ïïð ¬± ÌØ ëô ¿¼¼ ±²» ¬¸®±«¹¸ ´¿²» ×óìçì ÌØ ëë ¬± ×óçìô ¿¼¼ ±²» ¬¸®±«¹¸ ´¿²» ÌØ êïð ÝÍßØ èï ¬± ×óçìô Ý±³°´»¬» º±«®ó´¿²» º®»»©¿§ Ì±¬¿´æ ü íðð ³·´´·±² Ìóïé Wastewater System Statement -- Chanhassen Key Changes in the Plan The revised Water Resources Management Policy Plan, adopted by the Metropolitan Council in March 2005, is the metropolitan system plan for metropolitan wastewater services with which local comprehensive plans must conform. This system statement summarizes significant elements of the metropolitan system plan and highlights those elements that apply specifically to your community. In addition to reviewing this system statement, your community should consult the entire Water Resources Management Policy Plan, the 2030 Regional Development Framework and other pertinent regional planning and policy documents to ensure your community’s local comprehensive plan and plan amendments conform to the metropolitan system plans. A PDF file of the entire Water Resources Management Policy Plan, the 2030 Regional Development Framework, the Local Planning Handbook and other regional planning and policy documents of the Metropolitan Council are available online at the Metropolitan Council’s Web site: http://www.metrocouncil.org/planning/framework/overview.htm. The revised Water Resources Management Policy Plan incorporates the following changes: ÿþ A coordinated approach to water supply planning in the metropolitan area with the goal of providing for a sustainable, reliable and secure supply of high quality water to support orderly economic growth and maintain the region’s high quality of life. ÿþ An approach to surface water management that ties together the control of pollution from point and nonpoint sources. Local surface water management plans will be reviewed for impacts on the regional wastewater system. ÿþ A policy under which the Council will consider acquiring and operating local wastewater treatment plants in rural growth centers upon request where enough growth is projected to make it economically feasible for the Council to become involved. ÿþ A plan that provides for cities to reduce excessive inflow and infiltration (I/I) of clear water into the metropolitan sewer system. A financial assistance/surcharge program is included that will provide a funding mechanism to help solve the I/I problem. ÿþ A policy that continues to require inspections of individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS) at least once every three years by trained individuals. In addition, the Council has added further clarification on what is needed in a community’s local ISTS management program. W - 1 System Plan Considerations Affecting Your Community 1. Metropolitan Sewer Service Forecasts: The forecasts of population, households, employment, and wastewater flows for Chanhassen as contained in the adopted Water Resources Management Policy Plan are listed below. These forecasts are for sewered development. The sewered housing forecasts were estimated based on SAC data, annual city reports, current trends and other information relating to your community. The wastewater flows are based on historical wastewater flow data and the projected sewered housing and employment data. Table 1 Year 2010 2020 2030 Sewered Population 26,800 34,500 38,000 Sewered Households 9,900 12,800 14,800 Sewered Employment 13,030 15,200 15,600 Average Annual Wastewater Flow (MGD) 2.92 3.49 3.71 Allowable Peak Hourly Flow (MGD) 7.59 9.07 9.28 The flow projections represent the Council’s commitment to a level of service, assuming that the Council’s underlying demographic forecasts are maintained. Adjustments may be required based on verified growth or lack of growth. The city should contact Council staff to discuss any proposed adjustments. Flow projections do not represent an allocation of interceptor capacity except in the event a temporary system constraint occurs. The community must strive to keep its wet weather flows within the allowable peak hourly rate. At a minimum the Council will reevaluate flow projections every five years. Moreover, the Council will also continue to monitor each city’s flow on a continuous basis and note any significant changes. The Council will use these growth and wastewater flow forecasts to plan all future interceptors and treatment work needed to serve your community. The Council will not design future interceptor improvements or treatment facilities to handle peak hourly flows in excess of the allowable rate for your city. Chanhassen, through its comprehensive planning process, must decide the location and staging of development, and then plan and design its local wastewater collection system to serve this development. If you plan a total wastewater flow from your community in excess of the Council’s forecasts, your assumptions will be analyzed by the Council for their potential adverse effects on the capacity or operation of the metropolitan system. You should also note that urban development at overall densities that are substantially lower than identified for your community in the Council’s Growth Management Strategy W - 2 Section of the Systems Information Statementwill also be analyzed by the Council for their potential adverse effects on the cost of providing metropolitan sewer service. Description of Metropolitan Disposal System Serving your Community: The attached map shows the location of the Metropolitan Disposal System (MDS) serving your community. The following paragraphs contain information on the existing and planned metropolitan facilities serving your community: The wastewater flow from the City of Chanhassen is treated at the Blue Lake WWTP located within Shakopee, MN. There are many projects scheduled for the Blue Lake WWTP through 2030. These projects will provide additional capacity at the plant as well as improve its ability to meet required permit standards. The City of Chanhassen is served by Council interceptors 8253-358, 7017-2, 7017-3 and 7017-4. Interceptor 8253-358 currently has a design capacity of 16.1 mgd to provide for the long-term needs of the city. The Council has a proposed Lake Ann Interceptor relief project scheduled to support the long-term needs of the city schedule for construction between 2011 and 2020. The city needs to verify its long-term needs as part of its comprehensive plan update. If necessary, detailed information regarding metropolitan facilities is available from the Council’s Municipal Services Section by calling the staff at (651) 602-1005. Increases in growth rates and resulting increases in flow beyond those shown in Table 1 may result in short-term capacity limitations within the MDS. Inflow/Infiltration Reduction Goal The Council’s Water Resources Management Policy Plan states that the Council will establish I/I goals for all communities discharging wastewater to the MDS. Communities that have excessive I/I in their sanitary sewer systems will be required to eliminate the excessive I/I by 2012. The Council will begin the implementation of an I/I assistance/surcharge program in 2007. The monies collected from the communities with excessive I/I may be used by those communities to remove I/I from their systems. The Council will limit increases in service within those communities that have not met their I/I goal(s) starting in 2013. The Council will meet with the community and discuss this alternative before it is implemented. This time period may be shorter if excessive I/I jeopardizes the Council’s ability to convey wastewater without an overflow occurring. In this case the Council may limit increases in service within those communities that have excessive I/I immediately upon notification to the community. The Council plans to implement a wastewater rate demand charge program, starting in 2013, for those communities that have not met their I/I goals. These revenues will be used to help defray the cost of providing attenuation within the MDS to recover the capacity lost to excessive I/I. W - 3 The I/I goal established for the City of Chanhassen is the allowable peak hourly flow rate as shown in Table 1 and varies based on annual average flow. The Council’s metering program shows that the city’s 2004 annual average flow was 2.15 mgd. The current I/I goal for your community is an allowable peak hourly flow of 5.97 mgd. The city is currently meeting its I/I goals. Specific Requirements for the Sewer Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan The Council has completed a review of the current information in the city’s existing comprehensive plan and has determined that the following information is needed to update the sewer element of the city’s comprehensive plan/local sewer policy plan: ÿþ A sewer map showing the city’s existing service area and proposed trunk sewer system through 2030 and ultimate sewer service area. ÿþ A table showing the projected population, households, employment and flow forecasts by interceptor for the city for 2010, 2020 and 2030. ÿþ A description of the city’s I/I program. What efforts does the city make in the maintenance of its sanitary disposal system? Does the city prohibit the connection of sump pumps, rain leaders and passive drain tile from the sanitary sewer system? 2. Management of Individual Sewage Treatment Systems The Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires the sewer element (local sewer policy plan) of the local comprehensive plan to describe the standards and conditions under which the installation of individual sewage treatment systems will be permitted and to the extent practicable, the areas not suitable for public or private systems. The new Water Resources Management Policy Plan states that the appropriate density for development with individual sewage treatment systems depends on the suitability of the soils to treat wastewater and whether space is available for a primary and back up drainfield. It is the Council’s position that all municipalities and counties allowing individual sewage treatment systems should incorporate current MPCA regulations (Minn. Rules Chapter 7080) as part of a program for managing individual sewage treatment systems in the sewer element of their local comprehensive plan and implement the standards in issuing permits. Chanhassen should adopt a management program consistent with state rules. An overview of Chanhassen’s management program must be included in the community’s local comprehensive plan update. If adequate information on the management program is not included; the comprehensive plan will be found incomplete for review until the required information is provided to the Council. 3. Surface Water Management In 1995, Minnesota Statutes section 473.859, subd. 2, was amended to make the local surface water management plan required by Minnesota Statutes section 103B.235 a part of W - 4 the land use plan of the local comprehensive plan. Section 103B.235 provides that a local surface water management plan should be prepared once a watershed plan for the area has been approved. Section 103B.235 also generally identifies the content requirements for the plan. The local surface water management plan must be submitted to both the watershed management organization(s) within whose watershed the community is located and to the Metropolitan Council for its review. For guidelines on the contents of local surface water management plans, please refer to Appendix B2-b of the Council’s Water Resources Management Policy Plan. Council records indicate that Chanhassen is in the Carver County Watershed Management Organization and the Lower Minnesota River, Riley-Purgatory Bluff Creek and Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts (see attached map). The Carver County watershed plan was approved by BWSR in 2001. The Lower Minnesota River, Riley-Purgatory Bluff Creek and Minnehaha Creek watershed plans were approved by BWSR in 1999, 1997, and 1997 respectively. Therefore, Chanhassen was required to update its local surface water management plan by the end of 2004. The plan should be submitted to the Council for its review concurrent with the review by the watershed management organizations. Failure to have an updated local surface water management plan consistent with the local surface water management plan content requirements found in Appendix B2-b of the Water Resources Management Policy Plan will result in a metropolitan system impact. The Council also updated its priority lake list that was first developed in the 1980s as part of the Water Resources Management Policy Plan update. There are 5 priority lakes, Ann, Lotus, Christmas, Minnewashta, and Riley, in Chanhassen. The Council uses the priority lake list to focus its limited resources. The list is also used in the environmental review process. Where a proposed development may impact a priority lake, the project proposer must complete a nutrient budget analysis for the lake as part of the environmental review process. Advisories 1.Water Supply Planning Minnesota Statutes section 473.859, subd.3 requires cities with a municipal water supply system to develop a water supply and conservation plan and submit it to the Council for its review. Communities serving more than 1,000 people are required by Minnesota Statutes section 103G.291 to submit the emergency and conservation plan to the Department of Natural Resources. The guidelines for water supply plan updates were released in 2005. Chanhassen to update its local water supply plan consistent with the new guidelines and submit the water supply plan to the Council for its review. For contents of local water supply plans, please refer to Appendix B2-c of the Council’s Water Resources Management Policy Plan. W - 5 W - 6 W - 7 Regional Parks System Statement City of Chanhassen Key Changes in the Plan The2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan adopted by the Metropolitan Council in June 2005 is the metropolitan system plan for regional recreation open space with which local comprehensive plans must conform. This system statement summarizes significant elements of the metropolitan system plan and highlights those elements that apply specifically to your community. In addition to reviewing this system statement, your community should consult the entire 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan, the 2030 Regional Development Framework and other pertinent regional planning and policy documents to ensure your community’s local comprehensive plan and plan amendments conform to the metropolitan system plans. A PDF file of the entire 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan, the 2030 Regional Development Framework, the Local Planning Handbookand other regional planning and policy documents of the Metropolitan Council are available online at the Metropolitan Council’s website: http://www.metrocouncil.org/planning/framework/timeline.htm. To meet the needs of the region in 2030, the 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan includes the following changes to the current regional parks system. Designate two existing county parks and three trails as "regional." ÿþ ýþ In Washington County, Pine Point Park ýþ In Ramsey County, Tony Schmidt Park ýþ In Ramsey County/St. Paul, three regional trails – Trout Brook, Summit Avenue, and Lexington Parkway Acquire and develop three new parks. Search areas include: ÿþ ýþ Northwestern Anoka County ýþ Empire Township in Dakota County. Please note that the Metropolitan Council approved a park master plan and a boundary for the park has been established. ýþ Blakeley Township in Scott County Acquire and develop seven new trails. Search areas include: ÿþ ýþ The Crow River, in Carver County and Three Rivers Park District ýþ Both a north/south and an east/west trail traversing Dakota County ýþ An east/west trail traversing Scott County ýþ In Three Rivers Park District, a trail connecting parts of Baker Park Reserve; a trail connecting Baker and Crow-Hassan Park Reserves; and a trail connecting Crow-Hassan and Elm Creek Park Reserves Acquire land within the current boundaries of 30 existing parks and four trails. ÿþ P- 1 Acquire natural-resource lands adjacent to six existing parks and six existing trails. ÿþ To meet the needs of the region beyond 2030, the Council proposes four new regional parks or reserves and three new trails be acquired. These parks and trails would not be developed until after 2030, but the opportunity to acquire them will likely be lost if the lands aren't identified and purchased before 2030. The goal is to complete the acquisition of the regional park system and secure opportunities for future generations. Search areas include: Parks – Miller Lake area and Minnesota River Bluff and Ravines in Carver County; ÿþ southwestern Dakota County; and Cedar Lake area in Scott County. Trails – northwestern Anoka County; central to south Carver County; and Minnesota ÿþ River to Spring Lake in Scott County. P- 2 Figure 1: All additions and changes to Regional Park System Plan P- 3 1. Regional Park System Plan Considerations Affecting Your Community Regional parks and trails in your community The following regional parks and trails within Chanhassen as contained in the adopted 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan are listed below. Table 1: Regional Parks and Trails in Chanhassen Regional Park or Trail Unit Master plan boundary of Master plan boundary is not Nameunit is set. Comprehensive set. Comprehensive plan plan should acknowledge should acknowledge general boundarylocation with final boundary or alignment subject to park or trail master plan Lake Minnewashta Regional X Park Southwest Hennepin LRT –X South Regional Trail Highway #101 Regional Trail X Highway #5 Regional Trail X Twin Cities and Western X Regional Trail Lake Minnewashta Regional Park – This is an existing park with an approved master plan. The park’s boundary as shown in Figure 2 should be acknowledged in the city’s comprehensive plan. Marty Walsh, Carver County Parks Director is the contact person for Regional Park facilities in Chanhassen. He can be contacted at 952-466-5252. Southwest Hennepin LRT (South) Regional Trail – This is an existing trail that is managed by Three Rivers Park District. The trail’s alignment as shown in Figure 2 should be acknowledged in the city’s comprehensive plan. Contact Jonathan Vlaming at Three Rivers Park District for further information. He can be reached at 763-694-7632. Highway #101 Regional Trail – There is a potential master plan boundary adjustment to this trail corridor. The 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan includes six regional park boundary adjustments and seven regional trail boundary adjustments. One of the potential trail adjustments is in the Seminary Fen area along the proposed trail corridor. The primary purpose of the park and trail boundary adjustment is to protect regionally significant natural resource areas with significant recreation potential which are adjacent to the park or trail. A master plan has not been completed for this trail but there may be a role for the county parks to partner with others in some protection of this high quality natural resource area. Any change to this park boundary will result from a master plan process for the trail corridor. The County will continue to work with other partners on this project. The general alignment of the trail as shown in Figure 2 should be acknowledged in the city's comprehensive plan. Marty Walsh, Carver County Parks Director P- 4 is the contact person for Regional Park facilities in Chanhassen. He can be contacted at 952- 466-5252. Highway #5 Regional Trail - A master plan has not been completed for this trail. The general alignment of the trail as shown in Figure 2 should be acknowledged in the city's comprehensive plan. Marty Walsh, Carver County Parks Director is the contact person for Regional Park facilities in Chanhassen. He can be contacted at 952-466-5252. Twin Cities and Western Regional Trail - This is a proposed regional trail that would follow the existing railroad corridor. Since there is an active railroad operating on the tracks, trail planning would not take place until there is a change in the status of the use of the tracks. However, the general alignment of the trail as shown in Figure 2 should still be acknowledged in the city's comprehensive plan. Marty Walsh, Carver County Parks Director is the contact person for Regional Park facilities in the Chanhassen, he can be contacted at 952 466-5252. State and Federal lands The following State and Federal park and open space units provide outdoor recreation opportunities and natural resource conservation for the public and are considered part of the regional recreation open space system. These facilities as shown in Figure 2 should be acknowledged in the city’s comprehensive plan. - Minnesota Valley State Trail and Recreation Area – Minnesota DNR - Raquet Wildlife Refuge – Minnesota DNR - Minnesota Valley National Wildlife and Recreation Area – US Fish & Wildlife Service - University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum – University of Minnesota For more information about the DNR sites, call 651-296-6157. For more information about the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge call 952-854-5900. For more information about the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, call 952-443-1400. Figure 2 shows the location of all parks and trails listed above in Chanhassen, plus any parks and trails adjacent to the city's border. P- 5 Figure 2: Map of Chanhassen with regional parks and trails in the city and adjacent to the city P- 6 TOTALS