95-44 CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DA TE: APril 10~ 1~
RESOLUTION NO: 95-44
MOTION BY: Dock~,ndorf
SECONDED BY: Mason
A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 4
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Chanhassen (HRA) has determined to propose a new tax increment financing district (TIF
District No. 4) within the downtown redevelopment project area; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.174 through 469.179 (TIF Act)
requires that the City Council of the City of Chanhassen (City) hold a public hearing on
TIF District No. 4, following approval thereof by the HRA.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Chanhassen, Minnesota as follows:
The City Manager is authorized and directed to prepare a notice for
publication in the official newspaper setting a public hearing before the City
Council to consider this matter on May 22, 1995, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council
Chambers. The notice shall be published in the newspaper at least 10 but
not more than 30 days prior to the public hearing.
.
The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to notify Independent
School District No. 112 and Carver County at least 30 days prior to the
public hearing and to invite their comments thereon.
.
The City Manager is also authorized and directed to cause a notice
regarding TIF District No. 4 and a summary thereof to be sent to the Carver
County Commission in whose district the TIF District will be located at least
30 days prior to the public hearing.
.
The City staff and consultants are authorized and directed to take all other
actions necessary to bring this matter before the City Council at the time of
the public hearing.
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this lOth day of April, 1995.
A TTES T:
Don Ashworth, Ci~ Clerk/Manager
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Chmiel, Berquist, Senn, Mason, and Dockendorf
and the following voted against same:
None
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.