Loading...
C Veterans Monument UpdateMEMORANDUM TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager DATE: June 12, 2006 SUBJ: Veteran’s Monument Update BACKGROUND During one of our joint meetings with the Senior Commission, it was discussed that the city should look into developing a Veteran’s Monument/Memorial. Based on this discussion, staff has been working with the Senior Commission and Damon Farber Associates (the architect for City Center Park) to develop three concepts for the memorial and they are described below: CONCEPT #1 Five large monuments (8 feet high, 4 feet wide, and 3 feet deep). Each monument is proposed to represent a branch of the military (Army, Marine Corps., Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard). The monuments are proposed to be located south of the most easterly parking lot. Pros Cons ?? Located within close proximity to the The scale of the monuments is imposing. ? parking lot. Appears as an after-thought and separated ? Provides a sidewalk in front of the from the park. ? monuments. Too close to the parking lot and limited gathering area. Mayor & City Council June 12, 2006 Page 2 CONCEPT # 2 (2 Variations on Wall Designs) Option 2-1: The first wall option is proposed to be 4 feet high and 25 feet wide. Only one side of the wall will be viewed. The wall is proposed to be located east of the Library building. ProsCons ?? Reasonably proportioned. Appears as an after-thought and separated from the park. ? Located within close proximity to th West 78 Street. ? Architecturally uninspiring. Mayor & City Council June 12, 2006 Page 3 Option #2-2 The second wall is substantially larger in size. It is 7 feet 6 inches high and is proposed to be located south of the most easterly parking lot. The wall will be two-sided with a sidewalk surrounding it. Pros Cons ?? Located within close proximity to The scale of the monuments is the parking lot. imposing. ?? Provides a sidewalk in front of the Appears as an after-thought and monuments. separated from the park. ? Too close to the parking lot and limited gathering area. Mayor & City Council June 12, 2006 Page 4 CONCEPT #3 (3 Options for Monuments) These monuments are in a cluster of five. They are 5 feet high and 1 foot 8 inches deep and wide. They resemble a podium. Each monument is proposed to carry the symbol of one of the five branches of the military. Option 3-1: The first option proposes locating the monuments along an existing sidewalk th that connects the park to West 78 Street. Pros Cons Requires minimum alteration to the Appears as an after-thought and park. separated from the park. Mayor & City Council June 12, 2006 Page 5 Option 3-2: The second option locates the monuments along the parking south of the most easterly parking lot. Pros Cons ?? Located within close proximity to Appears as an after-thought and the parking lot. separated from the park. ?? Provides a sidewalk in front of the Too close to the parking lot and monuments. limited gathering area. Mayor & City Council June 12, 2006 Page 6 Option 3-3: The final option positions the five monuments on a half circle with a diameter of 27 feet. The monuments are proposed to be located east of the Library building and in the center of the plaza area. This is the preferred option of the Senior Commission and staff. . Pros Cons ?? Centrally located within the park. Requires relocation of an existing ? sidewalk. A well-thought-out design (has its own space yet is part of the overall park). ? Has a sense of formality. ? An open area for special ceremonies is located immediately east of the monuments. Staff has also met with Gary Boyle, Commander of the Chanhassen American Legion Club for their thoughts on the different concepts and a collaborative effort in funding the project. Commander Boyle is planning to speak to the American Legion Board concerning possible funding opportunities within the next couple of weeks. Mayor & City Council June 12, 2006 Page 7 REQUESTED ACTION It is recommended that the different concepts be discussed and that staff be directed to prepare cost estimates for the preferred design. Staff will also present design concepts to both the Park & Recreation Commission and Planning Commission.