1j. Moon Valley Contamination Clean-up Grant
CITY OF
CHANlIASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Administration
Phone: 952.2271100
Fax 952.2271110
Building Inspections
Phone: 952.227 1180
Fax: 952.2271190
Engineering
Phone 952.2271160
Fax 952.227 1170
Finance
Phone: 952.2271140
Fax: 952.2271110
Park & Recreation
Phone: 952.2271120
Fax: 952227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone: 952.2271400
Fax: 952.2271404
Planning &
Natural Resources
Phone 952.2271130
Fax: 952.2271110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone: 952.2271300
Fax 952.2271310
Senior Center
Phone: 952.2271125
Fax: 952.2271110
Web Site
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us
i~.":
~~J
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
FROM:
Kate Aanenson AICP, Community Development Director
DATE:
October 23, 2006 Cl~
Moon Valley Contamination Clean-up Grant -'
SUBJ:
BACKGROUND
On September 27, 2004 the City Council approved the Interim Use Permit for
Moon Valley. The applicant, Pemtom Land Company, is requesting to have the
City support a grant application for the Minnesota Department of Employment
and Economic Development. A grant request and the resolution for approval are
attached. On May 23,2005 and October 11,2004, the City previously passed
resolutions in support of the grant application.
ANALYSIS
The grant application is due November 1st. The applicant is requesting the
maximum amount of $50,000. The City will be the pass-through agency for the
funding. There is a requirement for the City to provide the 25% match for the
grant. This would amount to $12,500 which staff intends to have a memorandum
of understanding with Pemtom Land Company that the City would be reimbursed
for those costs. Additionally, the City is applying for $6,000 from the
Metropolitan Council's Tax Base Revitalization Account to assist in the City's
match requirement. Staff supports the clean up of the site and the request for
funding.
RECOMMENDA TION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution for the
funding request.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location map.
2. Resolution.
3. Grant application
g:\plan\2004 planning cases\04-27 - moon valley gravel mine\moon valley clean up 10-23-06 cc memo.doc
The City of Chanhassen . A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play.
Location Map
Moon Valley Contamination
Clean-up Grant
City of Chanhassen
I
I
I
\
I
\
I
I
I
I
!
I
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE:
October 23. 2006
RESOLUTION NO:
MOTION BY:
SECONDED BY:
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONTAMINATION CLEANUP GRANT
APPLICATION AND COMMITTING LOCAL MATCH AND AUTHORIZING
CONTRACT SIGNATURE FORMOON V ALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen as follows:
1. That the Chanhassen City Council hereby approves the Contamination Cleanup grant application to be
submitted to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED), by the City of
Chanhassen for the Moon Valley site.
2. That the City of Chanhassen acts as the legal sponsor for project( s) contained in the Contamination
Cleanup Grant Program and that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to apply to the
Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding of this project on behalf of the
City of Chanhassen.
3. That the City of Chanhassen has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the
institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration.
4. That the sources and amounts ofthe local match identified in the application are committed to the
project identified.
5. That the City of Chanhassen has not violated any Federal, State or local laws pertaining to fraud,
bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice.
6. That the City of Chanhassen participates in the Livable Communities Act Local Housing Incentives
Program, is eligible to make applications for funds under the Tax Base Revitalization Account and is
authorizing the City Manager to make application for funding to the Metropolitan Council on behalf of
the City of Chanhassen.
7. That upon approval of its application by the state, the City of Chanhassen may enter into an agreement
with the State of Minnesota for the above-referenced project, and that the City of Chanhassen certifies
that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all contract agreements.
8. The Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen are hereby authorized to execute such
agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant.
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 23rd day of October, 2006.
ATTEST:
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor
YES
NO
ABSENT
G:\plan\2004 PC\04-27 Moon Valley Gravel Mine\Containation Cleanup Resolution
Contamination Clean Up Grant
Application
Moon Valley Aggregates and Shooting Range Property
100 Flying Cloud Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55318
MPCA VIC Site #VP19420
Submitted on behalf of:
City of Chanhassen (Applicant) and
Mrs. Beatrice Zwiers/Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
(Property Owner)
November 2006
McCain
and Associates, Inc. <;3
FY 06 - 07
Contamination Cleanup Grant Application and
Part 1 of the Loan Application
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Instructions
Cleanup Grant Program Purpose/Background. .................................................. ...... ........... II
Grant Application Deadlines............................................................................................... II
Grant Eligible Costs ............. ..... ....... ...................... ........ .... ....... ....... ............................ ....... II
Grant Funding Availability....................... ........ ....... ...... ............. ...... .... ......... ............. ........ II
Eligible Grant Applicants ......... ................ .......... ..... ...... ...... ..................... ..... ............. .......111
Grant Eligible Qualifying Sites..... ............ ........ ....... .......... ................. ....... ................. .... ...111
Required Appraisals or Assessments............................................................................... IV
Required Cleanup Budget & Schedule ............................................................................ IV
Grant Local Match Requirement ............................ ............ ................. ..... ......... ............... V
Grant A ward Criteria....................................................................................................... VI
Application
Site Identification and History ......................................... ....... ......... ..... ..... ................. .........2
Site Information.......................................................................................................2
Site Valuation...........................................................................................................2
Map and Site Features..............................................................................................3
Current and Future Site Use.... .................................... ........................... ..................3
Site History..............................................................................................................4
Contamination..................................................................................................................... .4
Cost Analysis....................................................................................................................... 7
Investigation, Cleanup and Project Cost Budget .....................................................7
Additional Funding Sources .................................................................................... 8
Cost Recovery.......................................................................................................... 9
Financial Information and Alternative Financing....................................................9
Development Plan After Cleanup........................................................................................9
Property Taxes.......................................................................................................l 0
Job Creation & Retention.................. ........ ........................... ......... .........................10
Proj ect Schedule.................................................................................................... .12
Third Party/Company Commitment Information ..................................................13
Payment Information........................................................................................................ .13
Resolutions....................................................................................................................... . .14
Resolution # 1 ....................................................................................................... ..l4
Resolution #2 ........................................................................................................ .15
Cleanup
FY06-07
MINNESOT A DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
1st National Bank Building
332 Minnesota Street, Suite E200
St. Paul, MN 55101-1351
Contact: Brownfields and Community Assistance Unit
Local: 651-296-5005 Toll Free: 1-800-657-3858
***YOU MUST READ THE FOLLOWING NARRATIVE TO
FULLY UNDERSTAND THE APPLICATION PROCESS***
INSTRUCTIONS
PURPOSEIBACKGROUND: The Contamination Cleanup Grant program was established by
the 1993 legislature and Minnesota Statutes ~~ ll6J.551 - 116J.558 gives the Minnesota
Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) authority to award grants to
clean contaminated sites to allow for redevelopment. The purpose of the Contamination Cleanup
Grant Program is to reduce the potential threat to public health and the environment, create new
jobs, increase the tax base, and provide other public benefits by redeveloping polluted and
unproductive sites.
APPLICATION DEADLINES: Contamination Cleanup Grant application deadlines are
November 1 and May 1 of each year. In the event that these days fall on a weekend, the
deadline will be the following business day. Completed applications and supporting
documentation must be received by DEED at or before 4 P.M. on either date to be
considered for funding. You must submit a complete, original application and two (2) copies.
An applicant may apply for more than one site, but an individual (separate) application must be
completed for each site.
(Note: If you are also applying for an MCRLF Loan, you must complete this application, which
serves as Part 1 ofthe loan application. You must also complete Part 2, the MCRLF Loan
Application.)
GRANT ELIGIBLE COSTS: The Contamination Cleanup Grant can pay up to 75% ofthe
cost of cleaning contamination defined under the MN Superfund (M.S. ~ 115B.02), as well as
petroleum contamination. Types of petroleum costs that may be eligible under this program are
cleanup of rail yards, scrap yards, bulk oil storage facilities, and under and above-ground storage
tanks that are not eligible for the Minnesota Petrofund (see M.S. ~ 115C.Ol). (See the budget
section of this application for examples of eligible and ineligible costs).
Cleanup
II
FY06-07
GRANT FUNDING AVAILABILITY: The total legislative appropriation for this grant
program for fiscal years 2006 and 2007 is $4,362,000 of general fund monies for the
investigation and cleanup of Superfund contaminants and $12.4 million of Petro fund monies.
Since the program runs on a semi-annual grant cycle, the monies will be divided among the four
cycles run during the biennium. Up to $250,000 of this funding will be awarded per fiscal year
for DEED's Investigation and RAP Development Grants.
The legislature has designated that at least 25% of available funds be spent on remediating sites
in Greater Minnesota unless sufficient applications are not received. This allows the grant
program to assist with cleanup efforts statewide.
ELIGIBLE GRANT APPLICANTS: Eligible applicants for this program are statutory or
home rule charter cities, economic development authorities, housing and redevelopment
authorities, counties, or port authorities. While these are the eligible applicants, the site can be
either privately or publicly owned.
GRANT ELIGIBLE QUALIFYING SITES: A site must meet each ofthe following criteria
in order to qualify for a Contamination Cleanup Grant:
1) A grant may not be given to a municipality in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area unless it
is participating in the Metropolitan Council Local Housing Incentives Program. For
information on the Local Housing Incentives Program, call Guy Peterson at the
Metropolitan Council at (65l) 602-1418.
2) A site may not be scheduled for funding under the Federal Superfund Program (United
States Code, title 42, section 9601 et seq.) or the Environmental Response and Liability
Act (Minnesota Statutes SS 115B.01 to l15B.24) under the current or next fiscal year.
3) A site must contain contaminants, pollutants or hazardous substances as referenced in
Minnesota Statutes S 115B.02 or petroleum that is not eligible for the Minnesota
Petrofund. Asbestos abatement in buildings does not qualify under this grant program,
unless it is part of demolition necessary for RAP implementation.
4) A site must have an appraised or assessed value after adjusting for the effect on the value
due to contamination (pre-cleanup) that is:
l) less than 75% of the estimated project costs (see definition of Project Cost) OR,
2) less than or equal to the estimated cleanup costs (see definition of Cleanup Cost) for
the site AND the cleanup costs equal or exceed $3 per square foot for the site.
5) Finally, to qualify for this grant program, it is expected that the site will be improved with
buildings or other improvements within a reasonable period of time, and that these
buildings or improvements will provide a substantial increase in the property tax base or
will be used for an important publicly owned or tax exempt facility. The final
development of polluted sites may include, for example, commercial, industrial, office or
housing development.
Cleanup
III
FY 06 - 07
Housing developments should include an affordability component. There should either
be affordable units on the site, or units committed by the developer to another site within
the applicant's jurisdiction. Housing developments that do not include any affordable
units (on- or off- site) may not be considered for funding under this program.
"Affordability" is defmed using U.S. Housing and Urban Development and/or
Metropolitan Council standards, determined by the municipality.
REQUIRED APPRAISALS or ASSESSMENTS for GRANTS:
1) Attach an appraisal completed by a qualified independent appraiser licensed under
chapter 82B using accepted appraisal methodology which shows the current market value
(pre-cleanup) of the property, separately taking into account the effect of the
contaminants on the market value. This value should include both the value of the land
and, if applicable, any buildings on the Site. Along with the appraisal, please include the
projected value after cleanup and development.
OR
2) Submit the assessed value of the property for the latest year, as determined by the local
assessor, shown on the most recent valuation notice used under Minnesota Statutes
~ 273.121. Along with the assessed value, please include the projected value after
cleanup and development. Note: It is required that contamination be considered when
assessing the value of the property. Please verify with the local assessor that the assessed
value accounts for contamination.
"
REQUIRED CLEANUP BUDGET/SCHEDULE: You must submit a budget for cleaning the
site and a time line for cleaning and redeveloping the site (both the budget and timeline are part
of the following application). While the redevelopment of the site is considered in the
application and must be identified in the timeline, grant funds can only be used toward site
remediation. The budget page of this application should include only eligible remediation costs,
which are the statutorily defined as "cleanup costs" and "project costs."
Cleanup Costs: Includes the costs of developing and implementing a response action plan, but
does not include implementation costs incurred before the award of a grant unless the application
for the grant was submitted within 180 days after the response action plan was approved by the
commissioner of the pollution control agency.
Project Costs: Includes the cleanup costs for the site (see above definition), and the cost of
related site acquisition, demolition of existing improvements, and installation of public
improvements if necessary for the applicant to implement the response action plan.
Cleanup
IV
FY 06 - 07
Examples of eligible and ineligible costs include:
ELIGIBLE COSTS INELIGIBLE COSTS
Investigation (if not already funded under a Project/Grant Administration
DEED Investigation and RAP Development
Grant)
Cleanup Costs of appraisals or other application costs
Public Acquisition and Relocation (if Private Acquisition and Relocation (if
necessary to implement RAP) necessary only for redevelopment)
Environmental Consulting fees necessary to Asbestos Abatement in Buildings
implement the RAP
Public Improvements (ifnecessary to Contingencies
implement the RAP)
Demolition (if necessary to implement the Demolition (if necessary only for
RAP) redevelopment)
Activities eligible for funding under or match
requirements of another state cleanup program
Costs at sites scheduled for Superfund funding
Please note: you should take great care in estimating your cleanup budget. Grants are given to
sites that will be cleaned and developed. If you find additional costs that you did not anticipate
in the application budget, you will still be responsible for cleaning and developing the site. You
may submit a second application for your cost overruns, but there is no guarantee that you will
receive a second grant. At the same time, your budget should not be inflated but rather should be
based on careful investigation and planning.
GRANT LOCAL MATCH REQUIREMENT: It is required that the applicant or other local
source pay for 25 percent of the proiect cost as a local match to obtain a cleanup grant. Of this
local match, the applicant must pay an amount equal to 12 percent of the cleanup costs from the
municipality's general fund, a property tax levy or other unrestricted money available to the
municipality.
The rest of the local match may be paid with tax increments, regional, state or federal money
available for the redevelopment of brown fields (including money from the Metropolitan
Council's Tax Base Revitalization Account for metro applicants) or any other money available to
the municipality. If the applicant establishes a TIF district or hazardous substance subdistrict on
the site to pay for part of the local match requirement, the district or subdistrict is not subject to
the state aid reductions under M.S. S 273.1399. In order to qualify for the exemption from the
state aid reductions, the municipality must elect, by resolution, on or before the request for
certification is filed, that all tax increments for the district or subdistrict will be used exclusively
to pay (1) project costs for the site and (2) administrative costs for the district or subdistrict. The
district or subdistrict must be decertified when an amount of tax increments equal to no more
than three times the costs of implementing the response action plan for the site and the
Cleanup
v
L_
FY 06 - 07
administrative costs for the district or subdistrict have been received, after deducting the amount
of the state grant.
GRANT AWARD CRITERIA: Due to environmental contamination that has affected many
communities throughout Minnesota, a large number of applicants apply for the contamination
cleanup grants. The law allows DEED to make grants for sites that meet all the statutory
requirements and for sites that provide the highest return in public benefits for the public costs
incurred.
In order to evaluate the applications for public benefits with respect to the costs incurred, the law
specifies priorities which DEED must consider. The legislative priorities listed below have been
assigned maximum point values in order to systematically award grants in each cycle:
l) The potential increase in the property tax base of the local taxing jurisdictions relative to
the fiscal needs of the jurisdictions, which will result from developments that will occur
because of completion of the approved response actions. Maximum = 25 points.
2) The social value to the community that will result from cleaning up and redeveloping the
site. Social value includes the project's time frame, the number of new jobs, the
importance of the proposed facilities and the removal of blighting influences at the site,
the readiness of the project, the development potential and the financial health of the
project. Maximum = 65 points.
3) MPCA review of the reduction or elimination of potential threat to human health and the
environment due to cleaning that site. Maximum = 25 points.
4) The likelihood that the site will be cleaned without use of government money in the
reasonably foreseeable future. Maximum = 10 points.
5) The amount of cleanup costs for the site. Maximum = 10 points.
6) The amount and level of the commitment of municipal or other local resources to pay for
the cleanup costs. Maximum = 10 points.
Cleanup
VI
FY 06 - 07
1st National Bank Building 332 Minnesota Street, Suite E200 St. Paul, MN 55101.1351
Contamination Cleanup Grant Application and Part 1 of the
Revolving Loan Application
Cover Page
Applicant (Public Entity): City of Chanhassen, Community Development
Head of Applicant Agency: Mayor
(ex. Mayor)
Applicant Address: : 7700 Market Blvd. PO Box 147
City: _ Chanhassen
Zip Code: 55317
Project Contact Person for Public Entity: Ms. Kate Aanenson
Phone: 952-227-1100
E-mail: kaanensonCiiJl:i.chanhassen.mn.us
Mailing Address:
7700 Market Blvd. PO Box 147
Application Author/Preparer: James S. Aiken
Phone: 952-346-3854
E-rnail~aiken~ccainassociate~com
Mailing Address: _434 Second Street, Excelsior, MN 55331
Cleanup
FY06-07
I. SITE IDENTIFICATION AND HISTORY
SITE INFORMATION
1. Name of Site: Moon Valley Gun Range
Site Address: 100 Flying Cloud Dr.
City, County or Township: Chanhassen
Zip Code: 55318
Acreage of Site:
39.8
Sq. Ft. of Site: 1.733.688
Minnesota Legislative District # _34_(Ortmann)_A _34_(Hoppe) B
(Note: The Minnesota Legislature has a tool to look up legislative district numbers. You
must have a precise address and know the zip code of the site. Go to:
htt?://maps.commissions.leg.state.mn. us/website/ districtsL)
2. Current property owner(s): Beatrice Zwiers
When was the property purchased? 1986
For what amount? $425,000_
Who will develop the site? Pemtom Land Company
When was/will the property be purchased? 2008
Planned price including option payments is $6M
For what amount?
Who will own the project site after development? Individual homeowners
When was/will the property be purchased? _2008-2010 For what amount?
Purchase price dependent on unit - for 225 units on Site with average of $21 0,000 per unit,
purchase price will be $210K x 225 = $47.25 million.
3. Provide a legal description ofthe site.
Government Lot 1, excluding 5.95 acres south of northerly right of way for Highway 212/169
in Section 36, Township 116N, Range 23 West, Carver County.
SITE VALUATION: ASSESSMENT OR APPRAISAL
4. If you are applying for cleanup grant funds you may submit either assessed value
information or an appraisal. If you are applying for a revolving loan, you must submit an
appraisal and may not submit assessor's information in place of an appraisal.
Attach an appraisal completed by a qualified independent appraiser licensed under chapter
82B using accepted appraisal methodology which shows the current market value (pre-
cleanup) of the property, separately taking into account the effect of the contaminants on the
market value. This value should include both the value of the land and, if applicable, any
Cleanup
2
FY 06 - 07
buildings on the Site. Along with the appraisal, please include the projected value after
cleanup and development.
OR
Submit the assessed value of the property for the latest year, as determined by the local
assessor, shown on the most recent valuation notice used under Minnesota Statutes
S 273.121. Along with the assessed value, please include the projected value after cleanup
and development. Note: It is required that contamination be considered when assessing the
value of the property. Please verify with the local assessor that the assessed value accounts
for contamination. Please see Attachment A
MAPS AND SITE FEATURES
5. Attach an accurate and legible site and location map showing locations of prominent and
relevant site features such as buildings, retaining walls, etc. (NOTE: maps shall include
property boundaries, a north arrow and bar scale). The map(s) should show the following:
a) The current condition of the site including labeled structures;
b) The proposed development of the site including labeled structures; and
c) The location( s) of contamination.
Adding photographs is helpful.
Please see Attachment B
CURRENT AND FUTURE SITE USE
6. Zoning/Land Use:
A. Current: Industrial
Mixed-use
Commercial Residential
Other (Specify) Agricultural (pre-existing use)
B. After Cleanup: Industrial Commercial
Mixed-use Other (Specify)
Residential X
7. Current economic condition:
Vacant lot_ x_Developed site Other Gravel mine and Gun Range
8. How many buildings are currently on site?
Industrial How many are occupied? Ifvacant, for how long?
Commercial_1_ How many are occupied? _0_ Ifvacant, for how long? 5 yrs
Residential_O_ How many are occupied? _0_ Ifvacant, for how long?
9 . Year building( s) was/were built: 1990
10. Please describe the condition of the buildings on the site? Only building is the scale house
Cleanup
3
FY06-07
for the mine. Condition is fair, but currently does not have electric or water service.
ll. Is demolition required for RAP implementation? No Is demolition addressed in the RAP?
Yes; However demolition was not included in costs because it is not related to the lead
contamination issue.
12. Please describe how site redevelopment will spur adjacent development?
In addition to the old gravel mine and firing range, other area land uses include a junk yard,
cold storage facilities and several abandoned and vacant properties. The City of
Chanhassen has targeted this area for future development in its comprehensive plan.
There are currently three main obstacles to development in the area. These are 1.) the
lack of a local residential base to provide customer traffic necessary to support business.
2.) The current shabby industrial character of the area; and 3.) Lack of basic
infrastructure to support development.
This project will spur adjacent development in at least three ways:
1. By removing blight - The site is currently a dilapidated eyesore of bullet-riddled targets,
ramshackle buildings, and massive erosion of the unstable slopes. This project will add
scenic value and connect trails and existing green space. The unique balance of
residential area with integrated green space will enhance the character of the area and
make it more desirable in attracting business, jobs, and increasing property values.
2. By providing residential base to support commercial ventures in the area - Given the
natural beauty of the river bluff area, existing land use has historically been remarkably
underutilized. The residential development will add (not just displace) much needed
consumer traffic needed to attract high value business and jobs. The project will also help
to in-fill development around what is currently a "drive by" area between Eden Prairie
and Shakopee/Chaska.
3. By providing the momentum necessary to complete extensions of infrastructure (sewer and
water) necessary to spawn additional development. These will allow the creation of more
jobs and improve tax base for Chanhassen and surrounding communities of Eden
Prairie, Shakopee, and Chaska.
SITE HISTORY
13. Please attach a brief synopsis on the history and general background ofthis site. This
includes but is not limited to former uses of the site, known and/or suspected causes of
contamination, etc. Also describe the current condition of the site and include a description
of existing structures and existing occupants of the site.
See Attachment C
Cleanup
4
FY06-07
II. CONTAMINATION
14. Is applicant enrolled in an MPCA Program?
VIC Prog. I.D. 19420
VPIC Prog. I.D.
LUST Prog. I.D.
Other.
VIC Project Manager_Sarappo Phone: 651-296-7297
VPIC Proj. Manager Phone:
LUST Proj. Manager Phone:
15. Name(s) of current environmental consultant
Consultant Company:
Consultant Name:
McCain .and Associates, Inc.
Jim Aiken, P.G. Phone:_952-346-3854
16. What contaminants have been identified at the site? Antimony, Arsenic, Copper, Lead,
PAHs
17. To qualify for cleanup funding, you must attach a copy ofthe approved RAP and final
approval of your Response Action Plan from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
See Attachment D
18. Summary of Contamination Information:
A. Provide a concise description of the identified contamination and proposed RAP. The
description should include the occurrence of the contamination (i.e., are there distinct
areas of contamination or is contamination widely disseminated across the site? Is the
contamination at the surface or at depth?). The residential threshold for lead is 300
ppm. High concentrations of lead (over 1000 ppm) are located in three backstop
berms that received small arms fire on the firing ranges. Elevated lead
concentrations (above 300 ppm) are present at the ground surface and at a depth of
up to 1 foot in isolated areas of the firing ranges.
Lead shotgun pellets are widely spread across the surface of the lower trap range
floor and are visible on the ground surface in isolated areas on the upper trap range.
B. Complete the following table for soil contamination (be sure to include areas of
contamination that have been identified at the site but will not be treated or removed as
part of the approved RAP):
Cleanup
5
FY 06 - 07
General contaminant Total volume of Total volume of Remedy RAP Cleanup Goal
type (i.e., DRO, identified identified contamin- (i.e., residential
VOCs, metals, etc.) contaminated soil ated soil to be SRVs, industrial
(cyds) remediated ( cyds) SRVs, etc.)
Metals (Pb, Cu, 3,200 3200 Landfill (as Residential SRVs
Sb, As) appropriate)
Excavation! disp
osal with or
without
stabilization
PAHs 100 300 Exc./disposal Residential SR V
C. Complete the following table for groundwater contamination. If no or limited
groundwater investigation has been conducted, indicate this. Also indicate if a
groundwater investigation was conducted but no contamination was detected.
General contaminant Affected aquifer (i.e., Approximate dimensions of Remedy
type (i.e., DRO, VOCs, vvatertable,deeper contaminant plume on-site.
metals, etc. aquifers) Specify if the plume extends
off-site.
Not Applicable
D. List all compounds comprising the identified release in soil and the corresponding
average and maximum concentration for each compound. Also include petroleum in the
Cleanup 6
FY06-07
table. If distinct areas of contamination are present at the site, please describe separately.
(NOTE: It is acceptable to provide an overview with estimated average and maximum
concentrations if the amount of analytical data is overwhelming.) (Note: for PAHs, please
provide individual compound concentrations or Benzo(a)pyrene equivalent
concentrations for the carcinogenic P AH compounds.)
Compound Tier I Average Maximum
SRV (residential) Concentration Concentration
Lead 300 ppm 500 (in 110,000
samples where
detected)
Arsenic 5ppm 10 20
Copper II ppm 2600 14000
P AHs (BaP equivalent) 2ppm 2.5 27
Antimony 12 ppm 600 l800
E. Please do the same as in D. for groundwater.
Compound HRL Average Maximum
Concentration Concentration
Not Applicable
F. If groundwater at the site is contaminated, note the geologic makeup ofthe affected
aquifer (sand/gravel, till, lacustrine clay, etc.), and the estimated average linear velocity
(be sure to indicate how this number was determined). Not Applicable
G. Briefly describe possible exposure scenarios posed by identified contamination at the
site (i.e., ingestion or human contact with contaminated soil, consumption of
contaminated groundwater, ecological impacts, etc.), and nearby receptors that could be
affected by contaminants migrating from site (high value wetland/creeks/ rivers, etc.).
Cleanup
7
FY 06 - 07
The primary exposure scenario is ingestion, inhalation, and direct dermal contact by humans
contact with soiL There is also a potential worker exposure scenario by inhalation of dust
during excavation or mining or construction grading. A secondary ecological pathway exists
if contaminated sediment particles were to be carried off of the site to the Minnesota River
Valley and ingested by aquatic organisms, or waterfowl.
III. COST ANALYSIS
INVESTIGATION, CLEANUP AND PROJECT COST BUDGET
19. What is the total of all investigation, cleanup and project costs for the site?
$_264,500
20. How much grant funding are you requesting from DEED (cannot be more than 75% ofthe
cost listed in the question above) $_50,000
2l. Please fill out the following budget table to identify the investigation costs, cleanup costs
and project costs for the site as defined in the instruction section of this application. Attach
additional sheets if necessary.
BUDGET
Eligible Activities for Investigation and
RAP Development
% Complete
Date(s) Completed
Total Cost
Prelim Invest/Phase I/Phase L
Work Plan
100
Phase II Investt 'iltion
VRAP Development and Work
Plan
100
10/2004
9/2005
$62,500
Eligible Activities for Soil & Groundwater
Cleanup
% Complete
Date(s) Completed
Total Cost
Soil Excavation and Remediation
Construction oversight and
surve in
50
November 3D,
2006
November 3D,
2006
45
Cleanup
8
FY06-07
ConI. Sampling and
Im iementation Re ort
35
December 31,
2006
Other Project Activities Necessary to
Implement the RAP
% Complete
Date(s) Completed
Total Cost
22. What is the breakdown of sources for the above budget?
Amount
Source
$_214,500_
Beatrice Zwiers
$_$37,500_ DEED Grant
$_$12,500_ _City ofChanhassen ($6,500 from general fund; $6,000 via TBRA
Met Council Matching Grant)
$
$_$264,500 TOTAL (should equal Total in line E)
*(12% of the above cleanup costs in line C must be unrestricted funds; See page V)
23. If any of the activities listed above are partially or fully completed, how were those
activities financed? If work has occurred, please submit the invoices for which you will be
seeking reimbursement. Owner financed. See Attachment E.
24. If you are requesting acquisition costs and the amount for acquisition is different from the
appraised or assessed value, please explain why there is a difference. NA
ADDITIONAL FUNDING SOURCES
25. Please indicate below whether you have received or applied for all funds available to you
from other funding sources. If you have received or applied for funds, please list the
amount of funds received or applied for and the date(s) received or applied.
Cleanup
9
FY 06 - 07
26. Are any costs listed in the budget eligible for funding from other funding sources, such as
the Petrofund or another funding source?
Source Received or applied Amount( s) received Date( s) received
for all funds or applied for? or applied?
available (Y or N)?
Met Council Yes - Applied for $6,000 for matching November 1,
TBRA portion of DEED 2006
grant
Hennepin or Ramsey No - Site is located
County ERF, Loan, or in Carver County.
Assessment money
PetroFund No - Not a
Petroleum site
ACCRA No - Not eligible
MPCA Funding No - Not eligible
EPA No - Not eligible
Other (Specify) NA
COST RECOVERY
27. Has the site been identified as a state or federal Superfund site? _ Yes
x No
28. Has the party responsible for the contamination been identified? Yes
If so, who is the responsible party (RP)? Walter Griepentrog (deceased)
Is there any financial commitment by the RP to pay for some or all of the cleanup?
_ Yes _X No. Please describe: The previous owner andloperators are either
deceased, whereabouts unknown, or do not have resources to support the clean up.
Does the RP have avaiiable resources to pay for the cleanup? Explain: See above.
The property owner did not cause the release but has volunteered to initiate clean up.
29. Is a Cost Recovery Plan to recover costs from responsible parties in place? No
If so, attach the plan and amount of costs to be recovered.
Has consent of the Attorney General been attained for the Cost Recovery Plan?
(NOTE: It is not required that you have a plan to recover costs from the party responsible
for the contamination. However, if you are planning on recovering your costs from the
responsible party, attach information on the process. If this application receives funding
under this program, the consent of the Attorney General must be obtained before costs are
recovered. See M.S. S 116J.557 for further details on the distribution of funds recovered.)
Cleanup
10
FY06-07
FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND ALTERNATIVE FINANCING
30. Please submit a copy of the applicant's most current audit, or financial statement if an audit
is not available.
3l. Is there a possibility that the site will be cleaned up without DEED money? _ Yes _x _ No
Explain your above yes or no answer: The development financing is running out and the
owner may not be able to complete the clean up without DEED assistance. Local rules and
physical limitations of building on the bluff, limits the amount of available land. Current
market conditions and lack of infrastructure creates risk for developers and steep costs of
entry. Therefore, if the development plan falls through due to a lack of funding, the owner will
likely need to consider alternatives including reverting to use as a gun range and/or gravel
mining.
IV. DEVELOPMENT PLAN AFTER CLEANUP
32. What is the Development Plan for the site after implementation of the RAP?
(Number of housing units, square footage of buildings and how many, etc.)
Of the 39.8 acres on the Site, approximately 15 acres will be developedfor residential use
consisting of about 225 high-density condominiums or town homes. The remaining 24.8 acres
will be reserved as open space and protected scenic bluff under City Ordinance. The majority
of the development costs will include excavation of over 1 million cubic yards of soil. The
need for excavation is partly related to conformance with bluff ordinance and partly to the
available slope for building. Both of these factors along with the environmental aspects
present significant barriers to development and therefore the margin for profit is slim. It is
believed that the DEED grant will help to create a more practical economic basis for the
development to proceed.
33. What is the estimated cost of the redevelopments (construction costs not including the
cleanup costs)? $_30 to 35 million
Of these how much is public? $
private? $ 30 to 35 million
34. If the site will be redeveloped for residential use, provide the following data:
RENTAL:
Total number of units
Monthly rental cost per unit $
Number of affordable units*
Cleanup
11
FY06-07
Construction cost per unit $
OWNER OCCUPIED: Total number of units 225
Purchase price per unit $ 220,000
Number of affordable units/homes* 34
Construction cost per unit $ $180,000
* Housing developments should include an affordability component per instructions on Page IV.
35. If affordable units will not be constructed on-site as part of this development, will the
developer be contributing to off-site affordable units?
If so, how many?
Where in the applicant's jurisdiction will they be located?
PROPERTY TAXES
36. What are the property taxes on the site for the current year (prior to cleanup)? $19,992
37. What is the projected property tax on the site after cleanup (before redevelopment)? Refer
to the local taxing jurisdiction's tax capacity value. $19,992 (clean up will have no
immediate impact on land valuation).
38. What is the projected property tax on the site after redevelopment? $ see below
A. How were the figures in Questions 43 and 44 determined? County Tax Appraiser _
B. Who determined them?
According to the Carver County Auditor's Office (952)-361-1960 estimated that the 2004
property tax on a $220,000 homesteaded property located at the Site would be $3080 per unit.
Assuming that there would be 225 units on site, the tax would be $693,000. The increase in
property tax revenue would be about $675,000 per year. For the entire project, the property
tax revenue would be $1,155,000.
JOB CREATION & RETENTION
39. Project the number of new jobs created after cleanup and development of the site. (Jobs
that did not exist in Minnesota prior to development)
Total New Jobs: 18 FTEs
Cleanup 12
FY06-07
NEW JOBS TABLE
Position Title Total # of Total # of Part- Annual Wage Expected
Full-Time Time Jobs per Job Hiring Date
Jobs
Retail/Office 3 9 40,000 2009
Medical Office 1 3 60,000 2009
Bank 1 3 45,000 2009
Gas/Convenience 1 3 35,000 2009
Fast Food 1 4 35,000 2009
40. Project the number of retained jobs after cleanup and development of the site. (Jobs that
existed either on-site or elsewhere in Minnesota prior to development)
Total Retained Jobs: _Not Applicable FTEs
RETAINED JOBS TABLE
Position Title Total # of Total # of Part- Annual Wage Former
Full-Time Time Jobs per Job Location of
Jobs Retained Jobs
Not Applicable
No local businesses will move to the Site, however, specific businesses currently within 1 mile
would enjoy immediate benefit from the development include:
Lions Tap Family Restaurant - Flying Cloud Drive, Eden Prairie
Halla Nursery -10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chanhassen
Cleanup
13
FY 06 - 07
Halla Golf Course - Pioneer Trail and 101
Golf Zone - 825 Flying Cloud Drive, Chanhassen
Green Gardens Landscaping - 826 Flying Cloud Dr.
Nearby commercial districts likely to also see business from the Site:
Eden Prairie
Chanhassen
Shakopee
Chaska
Cleanup
14
"l
-<:
o
0-
,
o
--l
"'cj
~
o
~
t'!'j
(j
~
00
(j
=
t'!'j
~
~
~
t'!'j
+::.
-
Vl 0 "t:I
i:l" >-T) (3
o ~-<
~ ~ _.
- ,. 0..
o..Vl(1)
~. """".
i:l ..... ~
(')~o..
-. (1)
5.-.....
(1) i:l S.
"'ie:li"
(1) (') 0..
.!8 ~ "=l
o (1) "'i
i:l 0 ..g.
g; i:l g
~ ~.....
(') _. Vl
.....Vl(')
...... i:l"
o S> (1)
i:l S 0..
re.. ~
(') -
-.....(1)
(1) i:l" 0
~ (1) ~
~ (1) .....
"=l ;>< ::::-:
~ "=l 2.
(') (1) i:l
0-. ~ (Jq
-< (1) .....
_. 0.. i:l"
0-. tj (1)
(1) P _.
Vl 0 i:l
o.ae:
(1) i:l"-<
S e; s.:
o ..... ~
g:o..e.
_.~ .....
o (1) ~
F ~ ~
(') 0 Vl
o >-T) ~
i:l _. i:l
Vl i:l '"
.....0..-
2 <' r5
(') _. i:l"
0-. 0.. (1)
o ~ '"
i:le.g:
~S'&\;
~ Vl
..... i:";" 0
~ Vl >-T)
i:l _. ~
0.. ~ (1)
(1) 0 0
i:l _-<
0..~(1)
o.."''''i
"'-e:..
~ I--l'~
~(1) ~ "=l
e; i:l" (3
..... (1) <...::..
0.. "=l (1)
~ "'i ~
i:l ..g.,-,
~ (1) S>
o ~ "'i
...... cr"
g"~o
"'i.....~
"=l ~ (')
(3 S -
c....::... 1-'. (t)
g 2. ~
..... tj ~
~ sP "=l
~ ~
<' ~ i:l
_. ..... 0..
f:"""t- I-l. .......
o' S d
:n (1) g.
::::-:-<
i:l (1)
(1) -
Vl.g
S
a
en
(')
:E:
m
C
c:
r-
m
c
-I
~
"
en
OJ
-<
-<
m
)>
AJ
)>
z
c
is:
o
Z
-I
:E:
(')
0-. "\J
a:~ en "\J ..,
!e..
::J 3 c;::;: ~ :::T ~:
CD CD :::0 III "\J
Co <:::0 ~ ~ 1/1 :::T
CD < !e..CD "\J "\J CD III ::J
-Ill ~ :::T ~ "\J
:::T_ 01/1 r[ "\J =1/1
da ,,- III en CD :::T
3 ~ C 1/1 -. - en III
C (j)' CD CD - - 1/1 >
rg.i: CD III (j)' < CD :E ;::;: CD
::J= 3 3 = CD
CD :;- en
III (') -0 CD CD g :::0 < 0 :;- m "
G)::J ::J ::J CD ..,
-'< .., III - - " CD ~ < en
(j)'o III ::J :::0 III 3 0 1/1 "\J CD )>
- - 1/1
Ill.... 9:0. ~ o' CD ;:1. ~. iii'
1/11/1 ::J i
-0 rE41 ::J - III ::J
0 -
h) -. ;:1. o' III
0- CD -
0- I ::J o'
(1)0 ::J
.....
IX >< )>
><
18 3:
~ c..
><
~ -<
c.. m
>< )>
~ 8 )> :::0
>< h)
~ 0
en 0
>< IUt
~ 0
><
z
c
-
c..
"TI
~ 3:
><
~ )>
>< 3: -<
><
m
>< c..~
><
>< ~ h)
>< c..0
0
>< >< ~- 0)
>< >< )>1
~ >< ~ en
><
>< >< ~ 0
>< ><
>< ~ z
><
>< ><
>< c
>< c..
><
><
>< "TI
~ 3:
~ )>
>< 3:-<
><
>< m
c..)>
>< :::0
>< h)
>< c..o
0
>< ......
>< )>
>< en
><
~ 0
>< z
><
v V C
v
(")
<>
.,
::>
.g
-
Vl
~
<:>
0-.
o
<:>
-.l
("")("")
Q -
= ~
f'-l =
:t=
="t:l
~
~("")
Q Q
= a
("")'a
Q ~
a ~
"t:l Q
-=
~ Q",
~~
Q ....
= ~
Q",
~
~
I IZ
>Q
= ~
(J'Q ~
= a
f'-l C"
....... ~
"",,"""l
IN ti:
=...
=N
oc=
I =
~
I
(")
<>
~
.@
,.....
0\
FY 06 - 07
THIRD PARTY/COMPANY COMMITMENT INFORMATION
42. If there is a commitment from a third party to develop on the site after cleanup, please
complete the following:
Third Party/Company Name: Pemtom Land Company
Contact Person: Mr. Dan Herbst
Title: President
Phone Number (include area code): 952-937-0716
43. Do you have an executed development agreement? Yes
44. Please attach a commitment letter from the developer or other commitment documentation.
(If you cannot obtain a commitment letter from the developer, please explain.) See
Attachment F
v. PAYMENT INFORMATION
45. Payment Information
Contact Person:
Ms. Kate Aanenson
Mailing Address:
952-227-1100
7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317
kaanenson(ii)t:i.chanhassen.mn. us
Telephone Number (include area code): 952-227-1100
Fax Number (include area code): 952-227-1110
State of Minnesota Vendor Number:
Minnesota Identification Number: 9390134
Federal Employer Identification Number: : 41-885331
Cleanup
17
FY06-07
VI. RESOLUTIONS
46. Resolutions are required to be adopted prior to submission of the application package. The
two required elements are:
1. A resolution from the governing body of the city where the project site is
located, which approves the application.
2. A resolution from the applicant committing the local match and authorizing
contract signatures. Note: Pursuant to M.S. S 412.20l, Statutory Cities
must authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute all contracts.
An applicant may either provide a separate resolution for each of the above, or combine them
into a single resolution, as long as they include the same elements. See Attachment G
Blank resolutions are included for your convenience. You may choose to reformat or combine
them, but make sure to include all of the statements that appear in our examples.
RESOLUTION # 1 - City Approving the Application
BE IT RESOLVED that the city of
has approved the
City where site is located
Contamination Cleanup grant application submitted to the Department of Employment and
Economic Development (DEED) on , by
Date
Applicant
for the
site.
Site name
I certify that the above resolution was adopted by the city council on
Date
Signed:
Authorized Official
Title:
Date:
Witnessed by:
Title:
Date:
Cleanup
18
FY06-07
RESOLUTION # 2 - Committing Local Match and Authorizing Contract Signature
BE IT RESOLVED that
act as the legal sponsor for project(s)
(Applicant)
contained in the Contamination Cleanup Grant Program to be submitted on
(Day/Mo/Yr)
is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of
and that
(Title of Authorized Official)
Employment and Economic Development for funding of this project on behalf of
(Applicant)
has the legal authority to
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
(Applicant)
apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure
adequate project administration.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sources and amounts of the local match identified in the
application are committed to the project identified.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
has not violated any
(Applicant) .
Federal, State or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of
interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state,
may enter into an agreement with the State of
(Applicant)
Minnesota for the above-referenced project(s), and that
(Applicant)
certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all contract
agreements.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that
is hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are
(Title of Authorized Official)
necessary to implement the project(s) on behalf of the applicant. Note: Do not include the
proper name, only the title o/the official. Pursuant to M.S. ~ 412.201, Statutory Cities must
authorize both the Mayor and Clerk to execute all contracts.
Cleanup
19
FY06-07
I CERTIFY THAT the above resolution was adopted by the
~ 00
Applicant
(City Council, County Board, etc.)
Date
SIGNED:
WITNESSED:
(Authorized Official)
(Signature)
(Title)
(Date)
(Title)
(Date)
Cleanup
20
Attachment A
Current Tax and Valuation Data
Carver County
http://www.co.carver.rnn.us/carvercountyrecap/RecapBill.aspx?T ax Y...
Parcel Number 25.0360200
Year: 2006
Property Address
1 00 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA
Tax Roll Type: REAL ESTATE
Jurisdiction: CHANHASSEN CITY
School District: SCHOOL DISTRICT 0112
Identification Information
9390 267TH ST
LAKEVILLE MN 55044-7890
legal Description
GOVT LOT 1
EXC: 5.95 AC LYING S OF NLY
R-O-W OF HWY 169/212
Section: 36 Township: 116 Range: 023
Real Estate and Personal Property Taxes are determined using the previous year assessment
value. Mobile Home Taxes are determined the current assessment value.
Property Classification:
AGRICULTURAL COMM LAND & SLOGS
Paid To Date
Est. Market Value - Land
Est. Market Value - Total
Taxable Market Total
$723,700.00 Special Assessments:
$818,000.00 RECYCLE MGT
$773,000.00 Total Tax/Asmts.
Installments Due Date
Taxes/Assessments 1 st Half 5/15/2006
Taxes/Assessments 2nd Half 11/15/2006
**Additional reductions in taxable value may apply due to special tax deferrals,
This Old House, Plat Laws, etc.
Yiew Pt'in'tableTaR S1:atet'nent
GlID
1 "f' 1
1 (\ In II') Af\C. "".1 1 nlt K
Attachment B
Maps and Drawings
Figure i-Site Location Map
Figure 2- Existing Conditions and Site Features
Figure 3-Extent of Contamination
Figure 4 - Development Plans
Figure 5 -Current Zoning
Figure 6 - Planned Use
Figure 7 - Photograph of Lead Contamination
'0
X
E
<.i
o
--'
.!'J
~
o
....
o
(!)
--'
::;
.l!J
"
Q)
"e-
o..
~I
iiJ
9
a.:
Legend
.---1 Approximate
L___, Property Boundary
D City Limits
. Source: Carver County Aerial Photograph
Farm Services Agency, 2003.
o 1000
1.1.1 I I I I
Scale in Feet
2000
I
{
Figure 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
Moon Valley Gun Range
Chanhassen, MN
:;;
0-
"
<D
N
("j
'"
<>
<>
~
~
'0
!!i
'5
'"
Q)
0::
Q)
0.
~
~
0>
u:
U;
0>
u:
'"
o
0.
&.
Base map and countrours provided by Martinez Corporation.
Aerial photography 2005
. Surface Sample Location
X Duplicate Sample Location
.A Intermediate Sample Location
Sample Name
5 Pellet Count
43 Soil Lead Concentration (ppm)
Approximate extent of lead-affected soil
t
FIGURE 'J z..
. S:~\Co.T'N' SOH... t"O"'~'i'UN~
Soil Sample Locations and Results Summary
Moon Valley Range
Chanhassen, Minnesota
~McC ·
434 2nd street
aln Excelsior, MN 55331
ph 952-346-3900
and Associates,lnc. Ix 952-346-3901
Q)
'"
'"
.c
0-
~
9
o
..,.
<>
~
:;;
<(
>
~
t5
"
'CS
9;
iL
o 50 100 150
1,1, I, I, I, I I
SCALE IN FEET
Base map and countrours provided by Martinez Corporation.
Aerial photography 2005
Hatched I circled areas show estimated extent of
lead-affected soil with greater than 400 ppm lead.
f
~ M C . 434 2nd Street
C a I n Excelsior, MN 55331
ph 952-346-3900
and Associates,lnc. Ix 952-346-3901
FIGURE3 .
o 50 100 150 300 Proposed Excavation Areas and Confirmation
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sampling Locations
Moon Valley Gun Range
SCALE IN FEET Chanhassen, Minnesota
P:\Projects\MVA\MVA 0401\DWG\Phase II Report Figs\Fig9-Excavation areas.dwg, 04/28/2006 04:30:26 PM
P,~A.\,IoIYA.040l\GnlM<IJ)ew:I"""","",~.1lI/ll'lIllIB4114:S7:27PM.~IIsl:lI...
~~~; ~;~~
~~~~ ~~~~
~;~~ ~~~;
6g~z g~~~
~~~.~ li"~,
10 ~~ ...~!-<
~~~~ ~~~~
~~U ~~~i
~~~~ ~~m
~~a ~~~
~n ~h
OlD." ~o~
~i~ i~~
aO~ "m
~h in
~~~ ~g~
Z~i!i ~~~
:H h*
~~i!j -i~o
~m. ~g~
~I o~
3:
o
G)
-
r
r
m
0' "e ~" I ~..~ ,
~~ ~~ ~m ~~ s~ ~
~~ ~~ ffl~ ~~z~ ~~ !
.- .. 'F . O~ .
~~ ~~ ~c m Z 6
~~ m~ ;~ c p~. ~ ~
~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
;!! ~ ~; ~~ ~ g ~ ~
~~ ~~ 81ii~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~~ ,~~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j
~ ~~ _ q g z ~
~ ~~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~
a ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~~ ~ F ~ m ~
~ ~~; g ~ ~
~~. ~ ~"
~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~
- ~s 8 ~ ~ z
~~Iii 2o~
~< ~8~
~ ~ ~ g ~ ~
'.~ ~ ~
o S
~
.
~
~
~
~
~
i
~
~
I
CJ
COG')
< CD "
CO :::::J
o CD --
"C 03 <C
3 -
CD s: C
:::::J ___
r+)( _
() CD CD
oa.
:::::J C ........
() (JJ ~
CO CD
"C
r+
CD
Dl
'"
'"
;::
Dl
'!=!
"
a
3
"U
'"
3
8'
3
r
Dl
::l
C.
C'l
o
3
'C
Dl
::l
];
el.
;;r
iil
iD
to
<<l
.c
<=
[
-i-i
00
i!i!
rr
-iCD
;or
me
m"
C'l"
r)>
m;o
)>m
;0)>
~~
:.:.~
",0
0:-:1
)>'"
,,0,
)>
"
~
"
m
c.-,
City of
Chanhassen
Zoning Map
RR - Rural Residential District
RSF - Single Family Residential District
R4 - Mixed Low Density Residential District
_ R12 - High Density Residential District
PUDR - Planned Unit Devel./Residential District
PUD - Planned Unit Deve!. District
:~~-=~~J ft2 - Agricultural Preservation District
_ CBD - Central Business District
_ BH - Highway and Business District
BG - General Business District
SF - Fringe Business District
BN - Neighborhood Business District
lOP - Industrial Office Park District
01 - Office & Industrial District
NE - Natural Environment Lake
RD - Recreational Development Lake
cz ~~.f~,i,~
,-
.t
\.
1
Figure 5
Current Zoning Map
City of Chanhassen
City of Chanhassen
2020 Land Use Plan
~ Residential-Large Lot
1S:$S (2.5 Acre minumum 1/10 acre
outside of MOSA)
Residential ..Low Density
(Net Dens~ Range 1.2 .. 4 u/ Acre)
lZ2.l Residential - Medium Density
(Net Densa.. RaIVlA 4 - 8 u/Acre)
_ Reside.mai'!. HigilDensity
(Net Density Range 8.. 16 u/ Acre)
lIill] Commerical
[IT] Office/Industrial
~ Office
_ Parks/Open Space
_ Public/Semi-Public Ai'
- Mixed Use raJD.
D Be - 1 Bluff creek Primary OVerlay District 1 [;
CJ Be - 2 Bluff Creek Secondary OVerlay District 2
~ !y,l p,9,~J~
l__
Figure 6
Planned Land Use
City of Chanhassen
Attachment C
Site History Summary and Photographs
Attachment C
Historical Summary
Moon Valley Mine and Range Property
Chanhassen, Minnesota
The Property is currently owned by Ms. Beatrice Zwiers and Moon Valley Aggregates
(MY A) a company started by her and her late husband, Mr. Tom Zwiers. Zwiers
purchased the Property from Walter Griepentrog in the early to mid-1980s. Mr.
Griepentrog had owned the property since at least 1978. According to the current owner
(Zwiers), the Griepentrog family lived in the now abandoned house near the parking lot
until about 1990. Walter Griepentrog passed away in 1998. Contact with remaining
living members of the Griepentrog family indicated that they were of limited means and
did not comprehend the potential for environmental liability at the Property.
Prior to 1965, the Property was used as ski hill dating back to at least the early 1950s.
The Property was one of the first ski hills in the metro area to feature a mechanized rope
tow. The rope tow is visible as a linear feature on'theaerial photographs to the northwest
of the abandoned house near the parking area and driveway.
Based on aerial photographs of the Property, the current positions of the pistol, rifle, and
trap range are first evident in about 1965. Accordmg to the owner, the trap range firing
line was located approximately 100 feet to the southwest of its current location.
The trap range is just east ofthe tow rope house and historically has consisted of up to 11
single-station throwers. The pistol and rifle ranges are located east of the abandoned
house. An employee at the gun range who said that he worked at the Property since 1981
said that he believed shooting started on the Property in 1930. As far as he could
remember or had understood from others, the locations of each range had not changed
significantly. The lease operator of the gun range was Rick Weckman. Mr. Weclanan
became critically ill in 2004 and has not yet been interviewed.
No previous recycling or clean up activities have been documented for the gun ranges.
Gun range and gravel mine employees indicated that the property owner and several
others had conducted small-scale recovery ofbu1lets from the back stop berms in the
past.
Mining of the sand and gravel deposits at the Property began in about the 1940s. The
first areas miried include the pits to the east and west of the parking area immediately
adjacent to Flying Cloud Drive. The western pit slowly expanded until about 1989.
After 1989, a major period of gravel mining began and over the next few years, a large
quantity of sand and gravel was apparently removed from the Property. The mining
activities did not affect the area of the pistol and rifle ranges. However, large portions of
the surface material located within the assumed shotfall zone of the trap range were
Attachment C (continued)
Page 2
MVA Grant Application
apparently mined in the early 1990s. Reclamation of the mined areas was performed by
filling with screened (sand) materials, stripped topsoil and other stockpiled materials.
Because MY A also operated a trucking firm that hauled the aggregate materials, they
have indicated that they have direct knowledge that the sand and gravel was used in a
variety of road projects and was not used as fill for playgrounds, topsoil, or other use that
may have put it in direct contact with the public.
In about 1996, the City of Chanhassen approved an interim grading plan and
comprehensive plan guidance to facilitate future residential development of the property.
In 2001, Pemtom Land Company (PLC) acquired an option on the property now known
as the Settler's West Subdivision including Outlot G and a tract of land located west of
the Property and west of the Hennepin County Regional Trail. PLC initiated extensive
engineering and hydrologic studies of all the property owned by MY A so that it could be
included in a future development plan.
In 2003, a contractor was allowed to remove sand and gravel from the upper eastern
slope ofthe mine for road bed material. The contractor extracted gravel beyond the
allowed limits of the mine resulting in encroachment into Outlot G to the edge of the
proposed Settler's West Subdivision, and non-compliant (vertical face) slopes.
In 2004, Pemtom Land Company conducted a Phase I ESA of several properties
surrounding the Property and commissioned a soil investigation of the cul-du-sac area
located nearest to the shooting ranges.
The City of Chanhassen planning commission recommended approval of a revised
interim grading plan and conditional use permit for the Property. A condition of that
approval required the completion of a Phase I ESA for the Property and specifically to
address the lead issues.
After completion ofa preliminary Site Investigation, and a Phase I ESA, the project was
emolled in the VIC program with an endpoint goal of a limited No Further Action letter
including the lead soil. The limited NF A was focused on lead in soil, but not
groundwater issues due to limited leaching potential of lead in soil.
A Phase II Site Investigation was conducted in 2005 that included extensive soil
sampling and soil borings. The Phase II found significant concentrations of antimony,
arsenic, copper, and lead in the gun rang berms and within isolated portions of the trap
range. The Phase II report was submitted in October 2005, and included a Voluntary
Response Action Plan (VRAP). The VRAP called for demolition of buildings and
excavation of soils in each of the' gun ranges. Soils that are too contaminated to be
disposed in a landfill will be stabilized on-site and transported to a permitted disposal
facility. The VRAP was approved on June 16,2006.
I
L
Attachment C (continued)
Page 3
MV A Grant Application
The VRA began in September 2006 and has consisted of screening lead for recycling
from the berm soils and staging several stockpiles for preliminary TCLP testing. Weare
currently awaiting the [mal results of TCLP testing to begin the final stage of work at the
Property which will include stabilization of lead-contaminated soils and transport to a
solid waste facility. Preliminary results indicate that the quantity of soil that will require
stabilization will be about $40,000 more than was anticipated based on the Phase II test
results. This has created an additional financial burden for Ms. Zwiers, in addition to the
already significant strain of financing the previous parts of the project.
2002 Air Photo with property lines shown in white.
~"'c _II" ,.....~ ..:...... ~
.__==.i ~ IIiliI!IlI _.11' r.:i IE .." -.& _ II .....
l1li ...' .. ...,
....' .V '...' - iI!!I. .' . II' I _Ii
II .'."11 .. '. .. .
. "">" II .. _.11'. . II
",.)~":-;" . II ..JI_I ! II _ !4' ..' ~
o<,:;:;X:".'~4,'''~' .. iii " . 1llI I
, . '.i? N~'~ , .. - II II ~E
~ '<"~34,~, ~.~j~ .~.,: ". . II II' - III
. ..' .........: .... .,-,,,.,x. "-" atlliIl-
;,,1' '>'C0~~;1'; . ~~~, . '....,_
_..,...r.... ..N. .,.. ';:"'4lii..... "'."...../<. ". ...'11 ~.III
?lI'<~,:.;;.:_'...... .. ," .' ~
.......-.:... ::1-,.... 1~ ..
: .. ".'.' , .... '. ..11.......... .1 _. II.I.I..._.~..".I .-.11
, ',.. C" '....... III..... !IIII'.ilI1I. ill
"~' . '.... ,:', <;.111....., -:"If. ... .....1'] II
~ . .-_ .. ,....:. IliilI .. ... ii.
..... . ... ... II I.
-.~.~ ;.~_. ,. .;~. IIll
· " JJI-'. " '. rt........ : III!!
_.0."',.0..... ~ -/ '0 .... .....~":'..:-,)I... ~'III' .. -.,. '1Ii: II' 1\1
.' ./ '.' ru.1 ?;r,......~...... · .)".II"IIi' ..I., ..
..f..._....:....... ' '. . ,Y{.>.j~.._.,.1I ... -II
,,~. '.;;,.....;; '" " __ IIiI III,.. IIiiil .',JIlII
-....., t. '-.' <' '''-''II''
.... ....... ..
- .# - ,-;:
-'':.1.
lIiiI
......,'
. n::::
-'1IIil_
-'l.,.. , "
1I/:lI"
p,J
F'1II
- "',
IB" IIII!!III'.
.
--
rill II _I_
..illll
..
II
-
!I'll" ,
....
III . I:
..
" ",.,;;.-
III
II" 1Ii-
I
IIiII
.
"!':::lI
III
I
iii
II II
II ,.
II. I Ii
III~~" i.;.~ \.
::I:~~if~:f-.. ..'~.~
...!. :::::;,;~";:'"j'
~;,
~~.
Visible lead (and non-toxic) shot on edge of property on boundary with Outlot G.
Area of Outlot G with Pellets observed - Approximately 1 to 20 pellets per square foot.
View of Moon Valley property - view to southwest from Outlot G.
Trap range firing line and scale house visible at base of hilL
View to south from Outlot G..
View to west from Outlot G near edge of mine property.
View of approximate boundary between mine property and Outlot G -looking west from Outlot G.
Shell casings near pistol range.
Trailer storage and minor fugitive dumping in old east pit near entrance.
Old tank, more debris in old east pit lot.
Abandoned trailer near parking area.
Debris on northwest comer of old house (a.k.a. 'chalet').
Water is from flowing well located under debris.
View to southeast from trap range showing the gun range office (left)
and the old chalet house (right).
Approximately 6" diameter well located southwest oftrap range and north of scale house.
Pole-mounted transformer at trap range.
Scale house - view to northeast.
Semi trailer and 250 gallon AST - view to south from scale house.
Upper mine slope 1 - view to southeast.
Upper mine slope 2 - view to northeast.
Upper mine slope 3 - view to north.
Upper mine slope 4 - view to north/northeast. Vertical face is approximately 40' high.
Upper mine slope 5 - view to northwest.
Upper mine slope 6 - view to west/northwest.
Upper mine slope 7 - view to west.
Backstop berm - 100 yard rifle target.
100 yard rifle target showing forestop and side berms.
Close-up of backstop berm for 50 yard target. Pen is pointing to a lead slug at soil surface.
50 yard target at rifle range.
View of pistol target from firing line.
Trap range looking northwest. A target thrower is in foreground.
Bright colored area in background is broken target drop zone.
"..
Trap range view to north.
Note; this is an "ad hoc" range with no regulation competition shooting stations.
Top of hill on trap range looking north. Pen at right is pointing to stressed vegetation and
soil with more than 1 00 pellets per ft2. Area in background is the maximum shotfall
accumulation zone. Note that this area was mined in the early 1990s, creating the
gully or ravine in the middle of the photo.
Lead shot on ground at top of trap range.
Back edge of trap range looking to the south at the firing line.
Attachment D
RAP Approval Letter from MPCA
-~-
~,,~
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
~ .....4Y'" ......:r
--w.--
June 16,2006
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates
11111 Deuce Avenue
Elko, MN 55020
RE: Moon Valley/Outlot G Site
100 Flying Cloud Drive, Chaska
MPCA Project Number VP 19420
Conditiorial Approval of Response Action Plan
Dear Mr. Zwiers:
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff in the Voluntary Investigatioriand Cleanup
(VIC) Program has completed review of the following two documents for the Moon Valley/Outlot G
site, located at the address referenced above (the Site):
· Phase II Site Investigation and Voluntary Response Action Plan" (VRAP) dated October 21,2005;
and
· Addenda to the Moon Valley VRAP (Addenda) dated Apn128; 2006
These documents were prepared and submitted on your behalfby McCain and Associates, Inc. The
VRAP, as modified by the Addenda, is approved, subj ect to the following change:
· A minimum of five confirmation samples (one floor, four sidewall) shall be collected from each
hot-spot excavation performed on the upper trap. range. '
This letter-is subject to the disclaimers listed in Attachment A. If you have any questions
about the contents of this letter, feel free to call me at (651) 296-8947 or Wayne Sarappo at
(651) 296-7297.
~/1relY, .'i" /
V'f!nw~/~
Amy I)fHadiaris, P.G. '
Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Unit
Superfund Section
Remediation Division
. AK.H:ais
Enclosure(s)
cc: Jim Aiken, McCain and Associates
520 Lafayette Rd. N.; Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194; (651) 296-6300 (Voice); (651) 282-5332 (TTY); www.pca.state.mn.us
St. Paul. Brainerd. Detroit Lakes · Duluth. Mankato . Marshall. Rochester. Willmar
Equal Opportunity Employer. Printed on recycled paper containing at least 20 percent fibers from paper recycled by consumers.
ATTACHMENT A
STANDARD DISCLAIMERS
Moon Valley/Outlot G,
MPCA Project NUmber VP 19420
1. Reservation of Authorities
TheMPCA Commissioner reserves the authority to take any appropriate actions with respect to any
release, threatened release, or other conditions at the Site. The MPCA Commissioner also reserves the
authority to take such actions if the voluntary party does not proceed in the manner described in this
letter or if actions taken or omitted by the voluntary party with respect to the Site contribute t? any
release or threatened release, or create an imminent and substantial danger to public health and welfare.
2. No MPCA Assumption of Liability
The MPCA, its Commissioner and staff Q.o not assume any liability for any release, threatened release
or other conditions at the Site or for any actions taken or omitted by the voluntary party with regard to
the release, threatened release, or other conditions at the Site, whether the actions taken or omitted are
in accordance with this letter or otherwise.
. 3. Letter Based on Current Information.
All statements, conclusions and representations in this letter are based upon information known to the
MPCA Commissioner and staff at the time this letter was issued. The MPCA Commissioner and staff
' reserVe the authority to modify or rescind any such statement, conclusion or representation and to take
any appropriate action under his authority if the MPCA Commissioner or staff acquires iilfonnation
. after issuance of this letter that provides a basis for suchmodi:5.cation or action.
4. Disclaimer Regarding Use or Development of the Property
The M:PCA, its Commissioner and staffdo not warrant that the Site is suitable or appropriate for any
particular use.
5.' Disclaimer Regarding Investigative or Response Action at the Property
Nothing in this letter is iiltended to authorize any response action under Minn. Stat. S 115B.17,
subd. i2.
Page 1 of1
l
Attachment E
Invoices for Project Work to Date
Main
and Associates, Inc.
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN
55331
T 952.470.1611
August 30, 2004
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
Invoice #: MY A040101
McCain Project #: MY A0401
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Preliminary Site Investigation
Invoice
For professional services from July 30, 2004 to August 27, 2004 including:
Compilation of Preliminary Site Investigation Data
Evaluation of Historical Maps, Geologic, Topographic, Aerial Photos, and City Directory Data
Preparation of Project Health and Safety Plan
Preparation of11PCA VIC application
Coordination and Communication with MY A and MPCA
Preparation ofW ork Plan Scope of Work Letter
Site Meeting with 11PCA on August 26
Soil Sampling and GPS Surveying at Site on August 26 and 27 (65% complete)
Itemization of Costs
Time
Name Units Rate Total
Jim Aiken Principal Hydrogeologist 36.0 hrs $108/hr $3,888.00
Nick R. Bonow GeologistJEngineer 28.75 hrs $55/hr $1,581.25
Time Subtotal $5,469.25
Expenses
Mileage 39 $0.375/mi $14.63
Vehicle Use 2 day $15 day $30.00
Maps, Charts, Photos Historical Info. Gatherers lLS $325.00 $325.00
Equipment - Digital imaging I day $I5.00/day $15.00
Equipment -Expendable 2 day $50.00/day $100.00
Equipment - Durable 1 day $30.00/day $30.00
Communication, Copy, Print 1.00% Labor 1 LS $54.69 $54.69
Expenses Subtotal $569.32
Subtotal
$6,038.57
$0.00
Budget: $21,058.00
Amount Payable:
28.7%
Credit/Offset
$6,038.57
Thank You. Jailles S. Aiken, P.G.
P:\invoices\MV A04011c\1V A040iOl.wpd
McCain
and Assoclates, Inc.
September 27,2004
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
E1ko, MN 55020
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Preliminary Site Investigation
Invoice
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN
55331
T 952.470,1611
Invoice #: MV A040102
McCain Project #: MV A0401
F or professional services from August 27, 2004 to September 27, 2004 including:
Completion of field soil sampling and surveying on Sept. 1
Preparation of Maps, Tables, and Survey Data (80% complete)
Preparation oftext for report (60% complete)
Review oflaboratory data
Communications with Sathre, Pemtom, and MV A
Preliminary $50,000 Brownfields Grant Information and Assistance (10% complete)
Time
Itemization of Costs
Name
Jim Aiken
Nick R. Bonow
Principal Hydrogeologist
GeologistJEngineer
Expenses
Mileage
Vehicle Use
Maps, Charts, Photos
Equipment - Digital imaging
Equipment -Expendable
Equipment - Durable
Communication, Copy, Print
1.00% Labor
Invoiced to date: $12,062.82
Budget: $21,058.00
57.3%
Amount Payable:
Units Rate Total
34.1 hrs $108/hr $3,682.80
44.5 hrs $50/hr $2,225.00
Time Subtotal $5,907.80
153 $0.375/mi $57.38
o day $15 day $0.00
OLS $325.00 $0.00
o day $15.00Iday $0.00
o day $50.00/day $0.00
o day $30.00/day $0.00
1 LS $59.08 $59.08
Expenses Subtotal $116:45
Subtotal $6,024.25
Credit/Offset $0.00
$6,024.25
Note: In appreciation for your business, we have reduced the billing rate for junior staff Invoiced to date: $12,062.82
to $50.00 per hour for the remainder of 2004. This reflects a savings of $222.50 on this invoice and on future invoices
in 2004! 11
Thank You. James S. Aiken, P.G.
P:\InvoiceslMV A0401 \''vNA040102.wpd
October 23, 2004
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Preliminary Site Investigation
Invoice
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952.470.1611
F 952.470.0728
Invoice #: MV A040103
McCain Project #: MV A040l
For professional services from September 27, 2004 to October 23, 2004 including:
Completion of Preliminary Site Investigation Report (5 copies)
Submission of PSI report and correspondence with VIC (l0/18)
Final Maps, Tables, and Survey Data
Preparation of text for report
Soil sampling for stockpile areas (authorized on 1015 site meeting)
Rush Analysis of samples
Review oflaboratory data
Communications with Ryan, Sathre, Pemtom, and MV A
Completion of$50,000 Brownfields Grant Information (Submitted 10/21)
Time
Itemization of Costs
Name
Jim Aiken
Nick R. Bonow
Principal Hydrogeologist
Geologist/Engineer
Expenses
Mileage
Vehicle Use
Laboratory (Rush)
Equipment -Expendable
Equipment - Durable
Communication,Copy, Print
1.00% Labor
Invoiced to date: $20,387.67
Budget: $21,058.00
Amount Payable:
96.8%
Thank You.. James S. Aiken, P.G.
P :\Invoices\MVA0401 \i'vlV A0401 03. wpd
Units Rate Total
71.9 hrs $108/hr $7,765.20
4.0 hrs $50/hr $200.00
Time Subtotal $7,965.20
80 $0.375/mi $30.00
1 day $15 day $15.00
1 LS $210.00 $210.00
0.5 day $50.00/day $25.00
o day $30.00/day $0.00
1 LS $79.65 $79.65
Expenses Subtotal $359.65
Subtotal $8,324.85
Credit/Offset $0.00
$8,324.85
cCain
November 30, 2004
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley ~ggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952.470.1611
F 952.470.0728
Invoice #: MV A040104
McCain Project #: MV A0401
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Preliminary Site Investigation
Invoice
For professional services from October 23, 2004 to November 27,2004 including:
Completion of Phase I Report (6 copies)
Request for No Association Letter for City ofChanhassen
Laboratory invoice for PSI
Communications with MV A and MPCA
Time
Name
Jim Aiken
Giovanni Orbita
Jim Berkas
Expenses
Laboratory (from PSI)
Maps, Charts (Phase I)
EDR Report (phase I)
Communication, Copy, Print
Invoiced to date:
$24,067.02
Budget: $24,058.00
Amount Payable:
Thank You.
James S. Aiken, P.G.
P:IL,voices\MV A0401\cVfV A040104:wl'd
Itemization of Costs
Principal Hydrogeologist
CAD
Engineer
1.00% Labor
100.0%
Units Rate T otal
15.0 $108/hr $1,620.00
3.0 $85/hr $255.00
1.5 hrs $80/hr $120.00
Time Subtotal $1,995.00
1 LS $1,330.00 $1,330.00
1 LS $19.40 $19.40
1 LS $315.00 $315.00
1 LS $19.95 $19.95
Expenses Subtotal $1,684.35
Subtotal $3,679.35
Credit/Offset $0.00 $0.00
$3,679.35
McCain
aoo Associates, inc.
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T952.470.1611
F 952.470.0728
March 28, 2005
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
Invoice #: MV A040105
McCain Project #: MY A0401
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase II Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from March 9,2005 to March 26, 2005 including:
For coordination, compilation and draft preparation of grant application documents
Preliminary work plan preparation
Itemization of Costs
Time
Name
Units
Rate
Total
Jim Aiken
Jim Aiken
Nick Bonow,
Principal Hydrogeologist
Principal Hydrogeologist
Geological EnglGeologist
23.8 hrs
8.2 hrs
15.75 hrs
$108/hr
$115/hr
$60/hr
Time Subtotal
$2,570.40
$943.00
$945.00
$4,458.40
Expenses
Communication
1.00% Labor
1 LS
$44.58
Expenses Subtotal
$44.58
$44.58
Subtotal
$4,502.98
Amount Payable:
$4,502.98
Thank You.
James S. Aiken, P.G.
Note: This invoice reflects a $7/hr discount on a portion of Jim Aiken's time as shown above. Thank
you for selecting us to assist with your project!
P:\Invoices\MV A0401"\1V A040105.wpd
McCain
and AssociatBs, Inc.
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
April 25, 2005
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
Invoice #: MV A040106
McCain Project #: MY A0401
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase IT Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from March 27,2005 to April 23, 2005 including:
For final preparation of DEED grant application and continued preparation of Phase II work plan
Itemization of Costs
Time
Name
Jim Aiken
Nick Bonow
Expenses
Communication
Mileage
1.00% Labor
Units Rate Total
1.4 hrs $115/hr $161.00
22.25 hrs $60/hr $1,335.00
Time Subtotal $1,496.00
1 LS $14.96 $14.96
18 mi $0.41 $7.29
Expenses Subtotal $22.25
Subtotal $1,518.25
Principal Hydrogeologist
Geological Eng/Geologist
Amount Payable:
$1,518.25
Thank You.
James S. Aiken, P.G.
P: \!nvoiceslMV A040 1 ""IV A040106.wpd
McCain
and Associates, Inc.
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
May 31,2005
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
Invoice #: MV A040107
McCain Project #: MY A0401
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase II Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from April 24, 2005 to May 28, 2005 including:
For preparation of Phase II Work Plan
Support for the city of Chanhassen
Preparation of resolution for grant application and revisions to health and safety plan
Itemization of Costs
Time
Name
Jim Aiken
Nick Bonow
Expenses
Communication
Delivery .
1.00% Labor
Units Rate Total
10.3 hrs $115/hr $1,184.50
28.5 hrs $60/hr $1,710.00
Time Subtotal $2,894.50
1 LS $28.95 $28.95
1 LS $21.79 $21.79
Expenses Subtotal $50.74
Subtotal $2,945.24
Principal Hydrogeologist
Geological Eng/Geologist
Amount Payable:
$2,945.24
Thank You.
James S. Aiken, P.G.
P:\Invoices\i'vlVAD40 I \iVIV A040 I 07.wpd
McCain
and Associates, Inc.
June 30, 2005
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
Invoice #: MV A040108
McCain Project #MV A040 1
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase II Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from May 29, 2005 to June 25, 2005 including:
Preparation of health and safety plan
Sampling and analysis plan
Incorporation of Martinez survey data
Redrafting figures to include new topographic data
Itemization of Costs
Time
Name
Jim Aiken
Niek Bonow
Anne Monzel
Principal Hydrogeologist
Geological Eng/Geologist
Administrative Assistant
Expenses
Communication
1.00% Labor
Amount Payable:
$6,016.57
Thank You.
James S. Aiken, P.G.
Budget Total: $91,130.00
Spent to Date: -$14.982.06
Remaining: $76,147.94
P:\InvoiceslMV A0401 li'vIVA0401 08.wpd
Units Rate Total
19.8 hrs $1l5/hr $2,277 .00
52.0 hrs $60/hr $3,120.00
14.0 hrs $40/hr $560 00
Time Subtotal $5,957.00
1 LS $59.57 $59.57
Expenses Subtotal $59.57
Subtotal $6,016.57
cCain
July 26, 2005
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, :MN 55020
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
Invoice #: MV A040109
McCain Project# MY A040 1
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase II Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from June 26 through July 23, 2005 including:
For partial completion of Phase II field work, project management and subcontractor coordination
Time
Name
Jim Aiken
Angela Ronayne
Nick Bonow
Anne Monzel
Expenses
Communication
Survey kit
Mileage
Delivery
Auto field use
Field supplies
Amount Payable:
Thank You.
James S. Aiken, P.G.
BudgetTotal:
Spent to Date:
Remaining:
P:\Invoices\1YIV A0401 \~N A040109. wpd
Itemization of Costs
Principal Hydrogeologist
Civil Engineer
Geological Eng/Geologist
Administrative Assistant
1.00% Labor
$9,414.26
$91,130.00
-$24.397.30
$66,732.70
Units Rate Total
33.0 hrs $115/hr $3,795.00
1.75 hrs $76/hr $133.00
82.5 hrs $60/hr $4,950.00
6.75 hrs $40/hr ~?70 00
Time Subtotal $9,148.00
1 LS $91.48 $91.48
2 days $15/day $30.00
116 mi $OA05/mi $46.98
1 LS $34.24 $34.24
4 days $15/day $60.00
1 LS $3.56 . $3.56
Expenses Subtotal $266.26
Subtotal $9,414.26
P:'!nvoiceslMV A040 1 \\fV A040109.wpd
cCain
and Associates, lnc.
August 31, 2005
:Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
Invoice #: MV A040110
McCain Project# MY A040 1
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase II Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from July 24 through August 27,2005 including:
Soil sample and boring location survey
Surface soil sample collection, packaging and shipping
Drilling - subsurface soil characterization and sample collection
Coordination of analytical and geotechnical soil testing
Review tabulation and plotting of analytical sample results
Itemization of Costs
Time
Name
Jim Aiken
Giovanni Orbita
Nick Bonow
Principal Hydrogeologist
Senior Technician
Geological EnglGeologist
Expenses
Communication
Mileage
Delivery
Auto field use
Subcontractor expense
Subcontractor expense
Subcontractor expense
Subcontractor expense
Field supplies
1.00% Labor
Soil Engineering Testing
Hickey Consultants
Test America
Braun Intertec
Amount Payable:
Thank You.
$18,730.74
Units Rate Total
6.7 hrs $ 115/hr $770.50
4.5 hrs $90/hr $405.00
110.75 hrs $60/hr $0,{;4:'\ 00
Time Subtotal $7,820.50
1 LS $78.21 $78.21
277 mi $OA05/mi $112.19
1 LS $179.96 $179.96
7 days $15/day $105.00
1 LS $642.00 $642.00
1 LS $311.57 $311.57
1 LS $4,466.00 $4,466.00
1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00
1 LS $15.32 $15.32
Expenses Subtotal $10,910.24
Subtotal $18,730.74
Total = $91,130.00
Spent to date = $43,128.04
Remaining = $48,001.96
JamesS. Aiken, P.G.
P:\Jnvoices\1'vJ."V A0401 '2vN A040110.wpd
P:\Invoices\lvIV A0401 l,'vIV A040110.wpd
cCain
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
September 28, 2005
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, :MN 55020
Invoice #: MV A040111
McCain Project# MV A040 1
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase II Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from August 28 through September 24, 2005 including:
For follow up sampling tasks and Phase n Report/V 01. Action Plan preparation, contractor specifications
and volume mapping
Itemization of Costs
Time
Name Units Rate Total
Jim Aiken Principal Hydrogeologist 7 A hrs $115/hr $851.00
Nick Bonow Geological Eng/Geologist 66.5 hrs $60/hr $':\,99000
Time Subtotal $4,841.00
Expenses
Communication 1.00% Labor 1 LS $48 Al $48 Al
Mileage 90mi $Oo405/mi $36045
Subcontractor expense Veit Environmental, Inc. lLS $2,065.00 $2,065.00
Subcontractor expense Test America 1 LS $479.00 $47<) 00
Expenses Subtotal $2,628.86
Subtotal $7,469.86
Amount Payable: $7,469.86
Thank You.
Total = $91,130.00
Spent to date = $50.597.90
James S. Aiken, P.G. Remaining = $40,532.10
P:\!nvoices\MVA0401'uvN A04011l.wpd
McCain
and Assodates, inc.
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346.3901
October 31, 2005
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
Invoice #: MV A0401l2
McCain Proj ect# MY A040 1
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase II Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from September 25 through October 29, 2005 including:
For completion of Phase IT report, VRAP and contractor specifications
Itemization of Costs
Time
Name Units Rate Total
Jim Aiken Principal Hydrogeologist 69.7hrs $115/hr $8,015.50
Todd Hartleben Senior Engineer 4.0 hrs $92/hr $368.00
Angela Ronayne Civil Engineer 1. 0 hrs $76/hr $76.00
Isaac Fuhr Civil Engineer 3.5 hrs $72/hr $252.00
Nick Bonow Geological Eng/Geologist 117.75 hrs $60/hr $7,00'; 00
Time Subtotal $15,776.50
Expenses
Communication 1.00% Labor 1 LS $157.77 $157.77
Mileage 19mi $0.40S/mi $7.70
Delivery 1 LS $66.25 $66.25
Subcontractor expense Test America 1 LS $870.00 $j:(70 00
Expenses Subtotal $1,101.71
Subtotal $16,878.21
Amount Payable: $16,878.21
Thank You.
Total = $91,130.00
Spent to date = $67.476.11
James S. Aiken, P.G. Remaining = $23,653.89
P:\InvoiceslMV A0401 \\1\1 A040 112. wpd
cCain
and Assoclates,lnc.
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
November 30, 2005
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Blko,:MN 55020
Invoice #: MV A0401l3
McCain Proj ect# MY A040 1
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase IT Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from October 30 through November 26, 2005 including:
For preparation of contractor specifications, bidding documents, prebid meeting, addendum, and notice of
award coordination
Itemization of Costs
Time
Name Units Rate Total
Jim Aiken Principal Hydrogeologist 28.2 hrs $115/hr $3,243.00
Todd Hartleben Senior Engineer 13.5 hrs $92/hr $1,242.00
Nick Bonow Geological Bng/Geologist 63.0 hrs $60/hr ~iJ7RO 00
Time Subtotal $8,265.00
Expenses
Communication 1.00% Labor 1 LS $82.65 $82.65
Mileage 38 mi $OA05/mi $15.39
Delivery 1 LS $26.78 $26 78
Expenses Subtotal $124.82
Subtotal $8,389.82
Amount Payable: $8,389.82
Thank You.
Total = $92,323.00
Spent to date = $75.865.93
James S. Aiken, P.G. Remaining = $16,457.07
P:\InvoiceslMV A0401 \ivN A040113. wpd
cCain
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
December 31, 2005
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
E1ko, MN 55020
Invoice #: MV A040114
McCain Project# MY A0401
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase IT Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from November 27 through December 31, 2005 including:
For implementation oversight of Phase III Remedial Action Plan
Stage 1: Demolition and dump waste removal
Itemization of Costs
Time
Name Units Rate Total
Jim Aiken Principal Hydrogeologist 7.0 hrs $115/hr $805.00
Todd Hart1eben Senior Engineer 2.0 hrs $92/hr $184.00
Nick Bonow Geological EnglGe010gist 23.5 hrs $60/hr $1,41000
Time Subtotal $2,399.00
Expenses
Communication 1.00% Labor 1 LS $23.99 $23.99
Mileage 72mi $OA05/mi $29.16
Expenses Subtotal $53.15
Subtotal $2,452.15
Amount Payable: $2,452.15
Thank You.
Total = $92,323.00
Spent to date = $78.318.08
James S. Aiken, P.G. Remaining = $14,004.92
P:\Invoices\i\{v A0401 ,""IV A040114,wpd
m
cain
and Associates; Inc. Q
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
February 1,2006
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
Invoice #: MV A040115
McCain Proj ect# MV A040 1
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase II Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from January 1 through January 28, 2006 including:
Oversight of demolition, waste removal and contract administration; Phase IIIa Remedial Action
Itemization of Costs
Time
Name
Jim Aiken
Nick Bonow
Expenses
Mileage
Units Rate Total
Principal Hydrogeologist 8.2 hrs $125/hr $1,025.00
Geological EnglGeologist 18.25 hrs $65/hr $l,lRfi )";
Time Subtotal $2,211.25
36mi $0.445/mi $16.02
Expenses Subtotal $16.02
Subtotal $2,227.27
$2,227.27
Amount Payable:
Thank You.
James S. Aiken, P.G.
P:\fuvoicesIMVA0401'-'VfV A0401 ]5. wpd
m
cain
and Associates, Inc. ~~
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
Aprill,2006
:Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
Invoice #: MV A0401l6
McCain Project# MY A040 1
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase II Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from January 29 through March 25, 2006 including:
For response to J\1PCA comments, contractor management and revision of RAP alternatives
Itemization of Costs
Time
Name
Jim Aiken
Nick Bonow
Expenses
Delivery
Units Rate Total
Principal Hydrogeologist 13.5 hrs $125/hr $1,687.50
Geological Eng/Geologist 20.0 hrs $65/hr ' s;, iOO 00
Time Subtotal $2,987.50
1 LS $26.78 $26.78
Expenses Subtotal $26.78
Subtotal $3,014.28
$3,014.28
Amount Payable:
Thank You.
James S. Aiken, P.G.
P:\Invoices\tvlV A0401\,\lV A040116.wpd
"
cain
and Associates, Inc. ~
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
May 1, 2006
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
Invoice #: MV A040117
McCain Project# MY A0401
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase n Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from March 26 through April 29, 2006 including:
For meetings with MPCA, preparation ofresponse letter and contingency plan
Itemization of Costs
Time
Name
Jim Aiken
Giovanni Orbita
Nick Bonow
Expenses
Mileage
Software
AutoCad
Units Rate Total
30.6 hrs $125/hr $3,825.00
1. 0 hrs $90/hr $90.00
38.25 hrs $65/hr $?,4Rt'l ?'i
Time Subtotal $6,401.25
nmi $O.445/mi $34.27
12.0 hrs $10/hr $120.00
Expenses Subtotal $154.27
Subtotal $6,555.52
Principal Hydrogeologist
Senior Technician
Geological Eng/Geologist
Amount Payable:
Thank You.
$6,555.52
James S. Aiken, P.G.
P:\InvoiceslMV A040 1 "'vIV A040 117.wpd
"
cain
al1dAssociates, Inc. <;;3
June 1,2006
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
Invoice #: MV A040118
McCain Project# MV A0401
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase II Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from April 30 through May 27, 2006 including:
For contractor bidding documents (recycle), field staking, coilection of casings; collection and analysis of
ag lime soil
Time
Name
Jim Aiken
Nick Bonow
Expenses
Mileage
Subcontractor expense
Durable equipment
Disposable equipment
Amount Payable:
Thank You.
James S. Aiken, P.G.
P:\lnvoices\MV A040lleVfV A040118.wpd
Itemization of Costs
Units Rate Total
Principal Hydrogeologist 2.7 hrs $125/hr $337.50
Geological EnglGeologist 17.25 hrs $65/hr $1,121 ?'i
Time Subtotal $1,458.75
82mi $0.445/mi $36.49
1 LS $480.00 $480.00
1 day $30/day $30.00
1 day $15/day $15.00
Expenses Subtotal $561.49
Total $2,020.24
$2,020.24
"
c
aln
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
and Associates, Inc. "rJ
July 1, 2006
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, :MN 55020
Invoice #: MV A0401l9
McCain Project# MY A0401
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase IT Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
For professional services from May 28 through June 24, 2006 including:
For initial VRAP activities, contractor coordination and surveying
Time
Itemization of Costs
Units Rate Total
Principal Hydrogeologist 6.9 hrs $ 125/hr $862.50
Senior Technician 15.0 hrs $90/hr $1,350.00
Geological Eng/Geologist 14.0 hrs $65/hr $91000
Time Subtotal $3,122.50
58 mi $0.445/mi $25.81
1 day $15/day $15.00
1 LS $346.13 $346.13
1 day $I5/day $15.00
Expenses Subtotal $401.94
Total $3,524.44
$3,524.44
Name
Jim Aiken
Giovanni Orbita
Nick Bonow
Expenses
Mileage
Auto field use
Rental equipment
Disposable equipment
Amount Payable:
Thank You.
James S. Aiken, P.G.
P:\lnvoices\MV A040 11.tVN A040119.wpd
McCain
and Associates, Inc. <;i3
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
August 4, 2006
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase II Site Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice
Current invoice information is summarized below. Itemized charges are shown on the
following page. Please review this information and let us know if you have any questions.
Project Number
Invoice Number
Invoice Date
Invoice Due Date
Invoice Amount
MV A0401
MVA040120
07/29/2006
08/28/2006
$3,807.87
Invoice activity details are listed below:
. F or initial VRAP activities, contractor coordination, stormwater plan addendum,
initial cleanup activities including bullet casing removal
Thank You.
P:\InvoiceslMV A0401 IMV A040120.doc
Invoice Details for MV A040120, Moon Valley Gun Range - Phase II Site
Investigation and RAP Development
Invoice Period Ending 07/29/2006
Description Qty Rate Amount
Week Ending 07/01/06
Jim S. Aiken 4.1 125.00 512.50
Nick R. Bonow 19.75 65.00 1,283.75
James C. Berkas 5 85.00 425.00
Mileage (rate per mile) - NRB 39 0.445 17.36
Week Ending 07/08/06
Jim S. Aiken .5 125.00 62.50
NickR. Bonow .25 65.00 16.25
WeekEnding 07/15/06
NickR. Bonow 9.25 65.00 601.25
Mileage (rate per mile) - NRB 18 0.445 8.01
Week Ending 07/22/06
Jim S. Aiken 1.2 125.00 150.00
NickR. Bonow 9 65.00 585.00
Week Ending 07/29/06
NickR. Bonow 2.25 65.00 146.25
cain
and Associates, Inc. <::3
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, MN' 55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
August 29, 2006
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range
Phase III VRAP Implementation
Invoice
Current invoice information is summarized below. Itemized charges are shown on the
following page. Please review this information and let us lmow if you have any questions.
Project Number
Invoice Number
Invoice Date
Invoice Due Date
Invoice Amount
MV A0401
MV A040121
08/26/2006
09/25/2006
$3,477.36
Invoice activity details are listed below:
· For continuing VRAP activities including lead screening, soil sample collection and
field mapping of excavation areas
Thank You.
P:\AD:MIN\INE1\QuickBooks Letter Templates\Invoice Letters\Window Envelope Invoice Letter with Details.doc:
Invoice Details for MV A040121
Moon Valley Gun Range
Invoice Period Ending 08/26/2006
Description Qty Rate Amount
Week Ending 08/05/06
Nick R. Bonow 1.75 65.00 113.75
Week Ending 08/12/06
Nick R. Bonow 9.5 65.00 617.50
Week Ending 08/19/06 -
Nick R. Bonow 11 65.00 715.00
Jim S. Aiken 3.2 125.00 400.00
Week Ending 08/26/06
Jim S. Aiken 5.5 125.00 687.50
Nick R. Bonow 14.25 65.00 926.25
Mileage 10 0.445 4.45
Mileage 29 0.445 12.91
~
cain
and Associates, Inc. r:r"J,
434 2nd Street
Excelsior, l\.1N,55331
T 952-346-3900
F 952-346-3901
September 28, 2006
Mr. Dan Zwiers
Moon Valley Aggregates, Inc.
11111 Deuce Road
Elko, MN 55020
Re: Moon Valley Gun Range
Phase III VRAP Implementation
Invoice
Current invoice information is summarized below. Itemized charges are shown on the
following page. Please review this information and let us know if you have any questions.
Project Number
Invoice Number
Invoice Date
Invoice Due Date
Invoice Amount
MY A0401
MY A040122
09/23/2006
10/23/2006
$21,301.34
Invoice activity details are listed below:
· For continuing VRAP activities including: soil sample collection, laboratory testing,
volume estimates, contractor oversight, and lead removal on upper trap range.
Thank You.
P:\Invoices\MV.<\.040 1 \,\oIV A040122.doo
Invoice Details for MV A040122
Moon Valley Gun Range
Invoice Period Ending 09/23/2006
Description Qty Rate Amount
Week Ending 09/02/06
Nick R. Bonow 47.75, 65.00 3,103.75
Jim S. Aiken 5.4 125_00 675.00
Mileage 109.5 0.445 48.73
Mileage 25 0.445 11.13
Auto Field Use (per day) 1 15.00 15.00
Disposable Equipment (day) 2 15.00 30.00
GPS (day) 3 250.00 750.00
Week Ending 09/09/06
GPS (day) 1 250.00 250.00
Nick R. Bonow 26.5 65.00 1,722.50
Jim S. Aiken 9.1 125.00 1,137.50
Expense (Soil Engineering Testing, Inc.) 1 74.00 74.00
Expense (Braun) 1 872.00 872.00
Expense (Braun) 1 218.00 218.00
Expense (Braun) 1 1,184.00 1,184.00
Expense (Braun) 1 436.00 436.00
Mileage 17.5 0.445 7.79
Week Ending 09/16/06
GPS (day) 1.5 250.00 375.00
Jim S. Aiken 6.3 125.00 787.50
Nick R. Bonow 28.25 65.00 1,836.25
Rental Equipment 1 3,876.60 3,876.60
Expense (Braun) 1 218.00 218.00
Expense (Braun) 1 218 218.00
Mileage 32 0.445 14.24
Week Ending 09/23/06
Jim S. Aiken 3.1 125.00 387.50
Nick R. Bonow 19.5 65.00 1,267.50
Leif A. Johnson 24.5 65 1,592.50
Expense (Test America) 1 105.00 105.00
Durable Equipment (day) 1 30.00 30.00
Mileage 76 0.445 33.82
Mileage 54 0.445 24.03
P:\Invoices\MV A0401\'vlV A040122.doc
Attachment F
Commitment Letter, Conceptual OfficelRetail Layout and
Developer Information
(from Hennepin Village located in Eden Prairie)
(
I.
,
I
j
.1
'I
~,
~
\
I
The Pemtom Land Company
7597 ANAGRAM DRIVE
EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344
(952) 937-0716 . FAX (952) 937-8635
October 11, 2004
Ms. Kate Aanenson
Community Development Director
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Blvd.
Chanhassen,:MN 55317
R.e: Commitment Letter for Brownfields Grant Application
Moon Valley Property, 100 Flying Cloud Drive, Chanlui.ssen, Minnesota
Dear Ms. Aanenson:
Since the City Council approval of our interim use permit for.the Moon Valley property,
we have proceeded to complete an Environmental Audit as required under the pe:t:mit
approval cqn~tion0im.ultaneously, we.thought it would be a ?Teat benefit to the .
property, the Gl'ty;-cfnd future landowners if there was a cooperat1ve effort to work WIth
the :Minnesota Pollution. Agency_ To that end, we are requesting the city to join with the
landowner to complete a Brownfields Grant Application.
The Pemtom Land Company has an option to acquire the Moon Valley property subject
to the completion of the grading permit, the environmental clean up of the site~ and the
city's future timing to extend utilities to this location_
The city had the foresight to prepare a Comprehensive Plan for this area providing for a
-mixed use of high-density housing and office/commercial uses.
We envision a plan tharwould fulfi.lI the vision of the Comprehensive Plan to develop
tbis property into such a mixed use, A mixed use plan was prepared by our company for
Hennepin Village in Eden Prairie_ There. was also a collaborative effort betWeen four
dev,elopers and the City of Edina which resulted in the renowned Edinborough and
Centennial Lakes, a very Sliccessful mixed use development on the Hedberg Gravel pit
site in Edina.
I have submitted inforniation to the city relative to Centennial Lakes and Edlnboroligh.
Attached is a land use plan for Hennepin Village showing the mIxed use of retail, office,
and wd to high-density housing as well as a generous allocation of park and open space
compri?ing over 40% of the site_
-=. ; \.~
Ms. Kate Aanenson
October 11, 2004
Page 2
We look forward to working with the city to complete a successful plan for the Moon
Valley property_ The landO'Wliet will make sure that all costs relative to this Brownfield
Grant Application will not be borne by the City of Chanhassen.
Sincerely,
Daniel J_ Herb
President
l ,
DJIDidt
EnclosUre( s)
,
l____
,c z.aE'J- W~stwood ?rOf~S3:0nal :::r~rv!::,,=~, Inc.
I
I
NEIGH80R!-f09D COMMERCIAL: 8.90 ac.
. 4,000 sf +/- Gas/Convenieoce (8 pLmp)
. 5,000 af +1- Bank (4 drive thru windows)
. 4,000 sf + / - Fast Food (drive thru)
. 25,000 sf +/- General Retail
. 5,000 sf +/- Retail/Me9icaJ Office
/
/
~.
, (-<2 /D:XJ)
-
\._---
IllGlIWAY 212-
\..
\ l~t'-
~'- /
~~
~'f \
----- \
-' L--
----
-
-
-,
!r rJl The Pemtom
" ' Land Com pany
~~'IF Wktwood Prof.ssional Services. loe..
~T ~~~onw.
(M.. PT-~ ""N lS).4o(
..l 1"'rwwlc:~11-Su:.f.u.:~J:'_!S.r'-22..
~
I
I
--"
I
o'
D"'t~ 2/6/03
Hennepin
Village
~
x
100'
200'
300'
Neighborhood . I
Commercial Center,
.------------ -..--
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
The Pemtom
Land Company
L
Daniel Jw Herbst
President"
Daniel Herbst-is the OWJler and President of The
Pemtom Land Company. He joined the Pemtom
sales team in 1968, was promoted to Property
Manager in 1970, named Vice President in 1972,
and purchased Pemtom in 1976.
In 1991 Mr. Herbst decided to concentrate on land
. .
developmeDt only and formed The Pemtom land
Cb.mpany_
M( Herbst has been actively involved either as a .
member or an officer in many business and
community organizations that have included the
folJowing:
· National Association of Homebuilders
o Builders Association of the Twin Cities
· Land Development Committee, National
Assodation of Homebuilders
· Metro and Public Policy, Builders Association of
the Twin Cities
.. .
· Governor's Critical Area Task Force
· Carver County Coordinated Services
· Chanhassen Jaycees
· Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce
Chanhasseh Planning Commissicin
Mr. Herbst is a licensed Real Estate Broker_ He
graduated from the University of S1. Thomas,
attended Graduate Schoo! of Business at the
University of Missouri, and served as Captain in the
United States Air Force_
7591 Anagram Drive. Eden Prairie, Minnesota. 952~~37-0716
River Hills - 1963
1,350 Units - BurnsYille, MN
Market Value - $40,000,000
Walden -1964
80 Units - BumsviIle"MN
, Market Value - $9,ODO,000
Oakmounte -1965
100 Units - Sno'review, MN
Market Value - $.3,500,000
Four Season5-1965
200 Units - Plymouth, MN
Market Value - $8,000,000
Off Site -1966
100 Units - Metro Area
Market Value - $4,000,000
Birnamwood Townhomes
1961
220 Units - Burnsviffe, MN
Market Value - $11,000,000
Park Hilfs - 1968
240 Units - sf:. Paul, MN
Market Value - $7,200, 000
Cimarron - 1968
505 Units - Lake Elmo, MN
Market Value -$8,050,000
The ViII ages - 1969
200 Units - Marshall, MN _
Market Value - $2,500,000
The Viiiages -1969
100 Units - Duluth, MN
Market Va!ue- $1,500,000
Sca~borough -1969
80 Units - Bloomington, MN
Market Value - $4,000,000
Windsor Green -1969
250 Units - New Brighton, MN
Market Value - $7,500,000
Brighton Square -1970
50 Units - New Brig-hton, MN
Market Value - $2,000,000 ._
The Pemtom Land Company
7597 Anagram Drive
- Eden Prairie, MN 55344
952-937-071 €
Project Resume
. Pheasant Run - 1970
150 Ur)its - Bumsville, MN
Market Value - $7,500,000
Cedarview-1971
41 Units - Minneapolis, MN
Market Value - $2,460,000
Riverwoods - 1972
280 Units -:- Burnsville, MN
Market Value - $14, 000,.000
The VjI[ages of
Eagle Lake -1973
280 U nits ~ Maple Gmve, MN
Market Value - $11,200,000
The Villages -1973
300 Units - Arden Hil!s, MN
Market Value - $15,000,000
Chimo -1975
36 Units - Deephaven, MN
Market Value - $1,800,000
Scarborough Woods -1976
36 Units - Bloomington, MN
Market Value - $1,440,000
Bayridge - 1978
49 Units - Bloomington, MN
Market Value - $6,125,000
Carsonwood - 1978
16 Units"":' Deephaven, MN
Market Value -$1,60Q,000
McCarthy's Woods - 1979
8 Units - GreenwooCi, MN
Market Value - $800, 000
Eagle B.luff-1S79
17 Units - Lake Minnetonka
Market Value - $1 ,700, 000
Amsden Ridge -1979
25 Units - Bloomington, MN
Market Value - $3,750,000
Amsden Ridge
Townhomes-1S80
17 Units - Bloomington, MN'
Market Value -$2,900,000
Woodbridge
Townhomes - 1'98-1
47 Units - Bloomington, MN
Market Value - $7,520,000 -
Amsden Ridge "
. CommerCiaf -1982
7 Sites - Bloomington, MN
Market Value -$1,200,000
Minnesota Valley _
Condominiums -1983
54 Units - Bloomington, MN
Market Value ~ $8,650,000
Timber Lakes -1 9B5
Eden Pra-irie; MN
Market Value - $3,750,000
Weston Bay -1980
24 Units -' Eden Prairie, MN
Ma rket Value - $4,800,000
Normandy Crest-19B7
17 Units - Eden Prairie, MN
Market Value - $4,250,000
Woods of Walden -1988
9 Units - Bunlsville, MN
Market Value - $2,025,000
West Oaks - 1988
Remodel 25 Luxury Condos
, Minnetonka, MN
Market Value - $1,800,000
Luxury Town homes -' 1989
17 Units - Minnetonka,. MN
Market Value - $~, 100;000
Proex Photo Stores -1980-89
21 Stores - Metro Area_
Market Value -.$1,680,000
Kingston Ridge-19S9-92
25 Units - Eden Prairie, MN
Market Value - $7,500-,000
Crimson B?y-1990'
5 Units - Chanhzssen, MN
Market Value - $1,900,000
Attachment G
City of Chanhassen Resolution
FY 06 - 07
MINNESOT A DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
1st National Bank Building
332 Minnesota Street, Suite E200
St. Paul, MN 55101-1351
Contact: Brownfields and Community Assistance Unit
Local: 651-296-5005 Toll Free: 1-800-657-3858
***YOU MUST READ THE FOLLOWING NARRATIVE TO
FULLY UNDERSTAND THE APPLICATION PROCESS***
INSTRUCTIONS
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The Contamination Cleanup Grant program was established by
the 1993 legislature and Minnesota Statutes~~ 116J.551 - 116J.558 gives the Minnesota
Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) authority to award grants to
clean contaminated sites to allow for redevelopment. The purpose of the Contamination Cleanup
Grant Program is to reduce the potential threat to public health and the environment, create new
jobs, increase the tax base, and provide other public benefits by redeveloping polluted and
unproductive sites.
APPLICATION DEADLINES: Contamination Cleanup Grant application deadlines are
November 1 and May 1 of each year. In the event that these days fall on a weekend, the
deadline will be the following business day. Completed applications and supporting
documentation must be received by DEED at or before 4 P.M. on either date to be
considered for funding. You must submit a complete, original application and two (2) copies.
An applicant may apply for more than one site, but an individual (separate) application must be
completed for each site.
(Note: If you are also applying for an MCRLF Loan, you must complete this application, which
serves as Part 1 of the loan application. You must also complete Part 2, the MCRLF Loan
Application. )
GRANT ELIGIBLE COSTS: The Contamination Cleanup Grant can pay up to 75% of the
cost of cleaning contamination defined under the MN Superfund (M.S. ~ 115B.02), as well as
petroleum contamination. Types of petroleum costs that may be eligible under this program are
cleanup of rail yards, scrap yards, bulk oil storage facilities, and under and above-ground storage
tanks that are not eligible for the Minnesota Petrofund (see M.S. ~ 115C.Ol). (See the budget
section of this application for examples of eligible and ineligible costs).
Cleanup
II
FY06-07
GRANT FUNDING AVAILABILITY: The total legislative appropriation for this grant
program for fiscal years 2006 and 2007 is $4,362,000 of general fund monies for the
investigation and cleanup of Superfund contaminants and $12.4 million of Petro fund monies.
Since the program runs on a semi-annual grant cycle, the monies will be divided among the four
cycles run during the biennium. Up to $250,000 of this funding will be awarded per fiscal year
for DEED's Investigation and RAP Development Grants.
The legislature has designated that at least 25% of available funds be spent on remediating sites
in Greater Minnesota unless sufficient applications are not received. This allows the grant
program to assist with cleanup efforts statewide.
ELIGIBLE GRANT APPLICANTS: Eligible applicants for this program are statutory or
home rule charter cities, economic development authorities, housing and redevelopment
authorities, counties, or port authorities. While these are the eligible applicants, the site can be
either privately or publicly owned.
GRANT ELIGIBLE QUALIFYING SITES: A site must meet each of the following criteria
in order to qualify for a Contamination Cleanup Grant:
1) A grant may not be given to a municipality in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area unless it
is participating in the Metropolitan Council Local Housing Incentives Program. For
information on the Local Housing Incentives Program, call Guy Peterson at the
Metropolitan Council at (651) 602-1418.
2) A site may not be scheduled for funding under the Federal Superfund Program (United
States Code, title 42, section 9601 et seq.) or the Environmental Response and Liability
Act (Minnesota Statutes ~~ 115B.Ol to 115B.24) under the current or next fiscal year.
3) A site must contain contaminants, pollutants or hazardous substances as referenced in
Minnesota Statutes ~ 115B.02 or petroleum that is not eligible for the Minnesota
Petrofund. Asbestos abatement in buildings does not qualify under this grant program,
unless it is part of demolition necessary for RAP implementation.
4) A site must have an appraised or assessed value after adjusting for the effect on the value
due to contamination (pre-cleanup) that is:
1) less than 75% of the estimated project costs (see definition of Project Cost) OR,
2) less than or equal to the estimated cleanup costs (see definition of Cleanup Cost) for
the site AND the cleanup costs equal or exceed $3 per square foot for the site.
5) Finally, to qualify for this grant program, it is expected that the site will be improved with
buildings or other improvements within a reasonable period of time, and that these
buildings or improvements will provide a substantial increase in the property tax base or
will be used for an important publicly owned or tax exempt facility. The final
development of polluted sites may include, for example, commercial, industrial, office or
housing development.
Cleanup
III
r
FY06-07
Housing developments should include an affordability component. There should either
be affordable units on the site, or units committed by the developer to another site within
the applicant's jurisdiction. Housing developments thatdo not include any affordable
units (on- or off- site) may not be considered for funding under this program.
"Affordability" is defined using U.S. Housing and Urban Development and/or
Metropolitan Council standards, determined by the municipality.
REQUIRED APPRAISALS or ASSESSMENTS for GRANTS:
1) Attach an appraisal completed by a qualified independent appraiser licensed under
chapter 82B using accepted appraisal methodology which shows the current market value
(pre-cleanup) of the property, separately taking into account the effect of the
contaminants on the market value. This value should include both the value of the land
and, if applicable, any buildings on the Site. Along with the appraisal, please include the
projected value after cleanup and development.
OR
2) Submit the assessed value of the property for the latest year, as determined by the local
assessor, shown on the most recent valuation notice used under Minnesota Statutes
~ 273.121. Along with the assessed value, please include the projected value after
cleanup and development. Note: It is required that contamination be considered when
assessing the value of the property. Please verify with the local assessor that the assessed
value accounts for contamination.
REQUIRED CLEANUP BUDGET/SCHEDULE: You must submit a budget for cleaning the
site and a timeline for cleaning and redeveloping the site (both the budget and timeline are part
of the following application). While the redevelopment of the site is considered in the
application and must be identified in the timeline, grant funds can only be used toward site
remediation. The budget page of this application should include only eligible remediation costs,
which are the statutorily defined as "cleanup costs" and "project costs."
Cleanup Costs: Includes the costs of developing and implementing a response action plan, but
does not include implementation costs incurred before the award of a grant unless the application
for the grant was submitted within 180 days after the response action plan was approved by the
commissioner of the pollution control agency.
Project Costs: Includes the cleanup costs for the site (see above definition), and the cost of
related site acquisition, demolition of existing improvements, and installation of public
improvements if necessary for the applicant to implement the response action plan.
Cleanup
IV
FY06-07
Examples of eligible and ineligible costs include:
ELIGIBLE COSTS INELIGIBLE COSTS
Investigation (if not already funded under a Project/Grant Administration
DEED Investigation and RAP Development
Grant)
Cleanup Costs of appraisals or other application costs
.
Public Acquisition and Relocation (if Private Acquisition and Relocation (if
necessary to implement RAP) necessary only for redevelopment}
Environmental Consulting fees necessary to Asbestos Abatement in Buildings
implement the RAP
Public Improvements (if necessary to Contingencies
implement the RAP)
Demolition (if necessary to implement the Demolition (if necessary only for
RAP) redevelopment}
Activities eligible for funding under or match
requirements of another state cleanup program
Costs at sites scheduled for Superfund funding
Please note: you should take great care in estimating your cleanup budget. Grants are given to
sites that will be cleaned and developed. If you find additional costs that you did not anticipate
in the application budget, you will still be responsible for cleaning and developing the site. You
may submit a second application for your cost overruns, but there is no guarantee that you will
receive a second grant. At the same time, your budget should not be inflated but rather should be
based on careful investigation and planning.
GRANT LOCAL MATCH REQUIREMENT: It is required that the applicant or other local
source pay for 25 percent of the proiect cost as a local match to obtain a cleanup grant. Of this
local match, the applicant must pay an amount equal to 12 percent of the cleanup costs from the
municipality's general fund, a property tax levy or other unrestricted money available to the
municipality.
The rest of the local match may be paid with tax increments, regional, state or federal money
available for the redevelopment ofbrownfields (including money from the Metropolitan
Council's Tax Base Revitalization Account for metro applicants) or any other money available to
the municipality. If the applicant establishes a TIF district or hazardous substance subdistrict on
the site to pay for part of the local match requirement, the district or subdistrict is not subject to
the state aid reductions under M.S. ~ 273.1399. In order to qualify for the exemption from the
state aid reductions, the municipality must elect, by resolution, on or before the request for
certification is filed, that all tax increments for the district or subdistrict will be used exclusively
to pay (1) project costs for the site and (2) administrative costs for the district or subdistrict. The
district or subdistrict must be decertified when an amount of tax increments equal to no more
than three times the costs of implementing the response action plan for the site and the
Cleanup
v
FY06-07
administrative costs for the district or subdistrict have been received, after deducting the amount
of the state grant.
GRANT AWARD CRITERIA: Due to environmental contamination that has affected many
communities throughout Minnesota, a large number of applicants apply for the contamination
cleanup grants. The law allows DEED to make grants for sites that meet all the statutory
requirements and for sites that provide the highest return in public benefits for the public costs
incurred.
In order to evaluate the applications for public benefits with respect to the costs incurred, the law
specifies priorities which DEED must consider. The legislative priorities listed below have been
assigned maximum point values in order to systematically award grants in each cycle:
1) The potential increase in the property tax base of the local taxing jurisdictions relative to
the fiscal needs of the jurisdictions, which will result from developments that will occur
because of completion of the approved response actions. Maximum = 25 points.
2) The social value to the community that will result from cleaning up and redeveloping the
site. Social value includes the project's time frame, the number of new jobs, the
importance of the proposed facilities and the removal of blighting influences at the site,
the readiness of the project, the development potential and the financial health ofthe
project. Maximum = 65 points.
3) MPCA review of the reduction or elimination of potential threat to human health and the
environment due to cleaning that site. Maximum = 25 points.
4) The likelihood that the site will be cleaned without use of government money in the
reasonably foreseeable future. Maximum = 10 points.
5) The amount of cleanup costs for the site. Maximum = 10 points.
6) The amount and level of the commitment of municipal or other local resources to pay for
the cleanup costs. Maximum = 10 points.
Cleanup
VI