5. Public Hearing to Consider Changing the Local Bd of Appeals & Equilization Process to an Open Book Process
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Bouievard
PO Sex 147
Chanhassell MN 55317
Administration
Phrj:12 952 227 1100
Fax 952227 1110
Building Inspections
Pllone 95~! 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 11 dO
Fax 9522271110
Park & Recreation
Phorle 952 227 1120
Fax 9522271110
Recreatlorl Cerlter
2310 Cou Iter Bou levard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning &
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 9522271110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 9522271310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www CI charlhassen mn us
5
----
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor & City Council
FROM:
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
,5' /+-r
, ~; .
DA TE:
November 27,2006
SUBJ:
Public Hearing to Consider Changing the
Local Board of Appeals and Equalization Process
Each year the City Council serves as the Board of Appeals and Equalization to
hear appeals from property owners who disagree with their proposed assessed
value. Over the years, I believe this process has frustrated both the City Council
and property owners. To try and simplify the process, I have asked Angie
Johnson, Carver County Assessor to attend our City Council meeting to explain
an altemati ve method called the "Open Book Process." Attached is an
explanation of the Open Book Process and the benefits to property owners, the
City Council, and the County.
After Angie has completed her overview of the "Open Book Process", staff
would ask that you open the public hearing for citizen comments.
RECOMMENDA TION
Staff is recommending approval of the "Open Book Process" for the next two
years with staff providing annual progress reports on how the new process was
received by the public.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Minnesota Department of Revenue Explanation on the Open Book
Method of Appeal.
2. Public Hearing Notice.
c: Angie Johnson, Carver County Assessor
g:\admin\tg\open book appeals-cc.doc
The City of Chanhassen . A growing community with clean lakes. quai ity schoois a eilarmlng downtown.
bUSinesses Winding tralis and beautilul parks A great place to live work. and play
~ Townships: Per Minnesota Statutes, Section 366.01,
subdivision 1, the supervisors of each town constitute
the town board. Two supervisors constitute a quorum at
a town board meeting unless the town is operating under
"option A," which means it has a five-member board of
supervisors. In the latter case, three supervisors are
required to meet the quorum requirement.
City councils: According to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 412.191, the city council in a standard plan
city shall consist of an elected mayor, an elected clerk,
and three or five elected council members (which
means these cities have either five or seven votmg
members). In optional plan cities, the city council
consists of an elected mayor and four or six elected
council members (which means these cities have
either five or seven voting members). In all statutory
cities, the mayor is a voting member of the council
and must be counted when determining whether a
quonun is present. A majority of the voting members
must be present to meet the quorum requirement.
Charter cities may provide that a different number of
council members constitutes a quonun.
Special boards: Appointed by the governing body of a
city, a majority of the voting members must be present
in order to meet the quorum requirement.
Each year, there are numerous complaints from property
owners who have taken time off from work - or simply
taken their personal time - to attend a local board
meeting only to find that the meeting won't take place
due to the lack of a quorum.
When a local board does not meet because a majority of
the members are not present, it sends a message to
property owners that the board does not value their time.
It also sends the message that the board does not take the
responsibility of serving as the Local Board of Appeal
and Equalization seriously.
Assessor's role when a quorum isn't present
Rather than simply sending home angry and frustrated
property owners, it is recommended that the format
change to an "open book" meeting with the assessor.
Property owners can discuss their issues one-on-one
with the assessor or the assessor's staff If they are not
satisfied with the outcome, they can appeal to the
County Board of Appeal and Equalization. This assures
that the time property owners set aside to appeal to the
local board is not wasted.
Arrive on time for the meeting
It is also very important that the board members and
all required attendees (county assessor, local assessor,
etc.) arrive at the meeting on time and that the meeting
begins at the scheduled time. This shows respect for
the people who are appealing to the board, and also
shows that you value their time.
*
B Explanations of alternate methods of appeal
Open book meetings
Open book meetings are an alternative to the Local
Board of Appeal and Equalization. During "open book"
meetings, the valuation and classification issues are
handled by the assessor's staff on a one-on-one basis
with the property owner. Typically, open book meetings
are held by the county assessor's staff. However, larger
cities with an appointed city assessor may hold their
own open book meetings.
The open book meetings are held in locations that are
convenient for property owners. Often open book
meetings are held over several days during both day
and evening hours. This allows property owners to
appeal when it best suits their schedules instead of
having to rearrange their schedules to attend a local
board meeting held at one place and time.
//]// J tr 1
1~~h/1t~/JI ~
Explanations of alternate methods of appeal
The open book meetings provide a forum for property
owners to meet with assessment staff on an informal
basis to review information about their property and to
ask questions about the assessment. This setting allows
the assessor's office to resolve questions and reduce the
nmnber of property owners who feel the need to appeal
to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization.
Property owners do not need to make an appointment to
meet with the assessment staff. They can simply show
up at the dates and times stated on the Notice of
Valuation and Classification, and an appraiser will
discuss their assessment.
Depending on the jurisdiction, the appraisers may
have laptop computers to access information about the
taxpayer's property. Some counties may be able to
link directly to their computer-assisted mass appraisal
(CAMA) system which allows the appraiser to obtain
data on sales of comparable properties.
When reviewing the details of the property with the
owner, the appraiser can verify the accuracy of the
county's data and correct any errors. The property
owner can also schedule an appointment for the
appraiser to view the property if needed.
Benefits for the property owner
Property owners often fmd that the open book meeting
is less intimidating than presenting their appeal to the
Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. They often
appreciate the fact that they can. have their questions
answered in a more private setting, and not have to be
apprehensive about making a presentation in front of
their friends and neighbors. In this one-on-one setting,
property owners may spend as much time with the
appraiser as they need. They can compare the value of
their home with the values of similar homes owned by
their neighbors.
The process is very efficient because concerns and
questions are often resolved immediately. Property
owners can see that the appraiser collects the same
information on all properties, reassuring them that the
process is the same for everyone, and they have not been
singled out for a value increase.
Property owners who are not satisfied with the "open
book" approach may appeal to the County Board of
Appeal and Equalization and/or appeal to Tax Court.
- - -..:"~,,,;'_-:'
Open book meetings
o
An operi book meeting is a meeting held by the
county assessor's office to discuss property owners'
questions regarding their assessments. The one-on-
one meeting usually is held as an alternative to the
Local Board of Appeal and Equalization.
Benefits for property.owners . ~
"Open book" meetings provide many benefits:
· No appointment needed.
· Property owners can verify or correct
information about their property.
· Property owners can schedule a time for the
assessor to view their property.
· The setting is less intimidating than a Local
Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting.
· The property owner does not need to "present"
their appeal in front of friends and neighbors.
· Property owners can compare their values to
the values of other similar homes.
· Questions and concerns are often resolved
immediately.
· The process is very efficient.
· Property owners may appeal to the County
Board of Appeal and Equalization and/or to
Tax Court ifnot satisfied with the outcome.
It is only a recommendation that the property owner
attend the open book meeting to discuss concerns prior
to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization. In a
jurisdiction that does not have a Local Board of Appeal
and Equalization, the property owner is not required
to attend an open book meeting in order to appeal to
the County Board of Appeal and Equalization.
Benefits for the local board
The benefit for the local board is that an open book
meeting saves time for board members. It eliminates the
need for the board to become familiar with and educated
on the local real estate market. Board members will be
able to spend this time concentrating on their other
duties as town board or city council members. In
addition, board members can avoid confrontational
situations with constituents and will no longer be put
into difficult situations by having to make decisions
about the property values or classifications of property
owned by friends and neighbors.
Benefits for the county
While the number of appeals made at the open book
meeting may not be less than the number of appeals to
the local board, the benefit for the county is that the open
book process allows for immediate consideration of
issues, and in many cases, appeals are resolved before
the County Board of Appeal and Equalization. The
process is efficient for the county because it can often
consolidate several jurisdictions into one meeting ( or a
series of meetings) instead of holding at least one
meeting in each jurisdiction.
Option 1: Transferring assessment and local
board duties to the county
The town board or city council may transfer the
powers and duties of the Local Board of Appeal and
Equalization to the county board (under Minnesota
Statutes, Section 274.01, subdivision 3) and no
longer perform the function of a Local Board of
Appeal and Equalization.
However, in order to exercise this option, the local
jurisdiction also must have its assessment done by the
county. This means that the local jurisdiction must give
up its local assessor. Some jurisdictions do not see this
as an option~ because they have no intention of
relinquishing this power to the county. For other town
boards or city councils, this may be a good option.
Before transferring the powers and duties to the county
board, the town board or city council shall give public
notice of the meeting at which the proposal for transfer
is to be considered (the public notice shall follow the
procedure contained in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 13D.04, subdivision 2).
A town board or city council that wishes to transfer the
assessment and local board duties to the county board
must communicate this intent in writing to the COlUlty
assessor before December 1 of any year to be effective
for the following year's assessment. This transfer of
duties may either be permanent or for a specified
number of years. However, the duties must be
transferred to the county board for a minimum of three
years, and the length of the transfer must be stated in
writing. A town or city may renew its option to transfer
its duties to the county board.
Property owners in jurisdictions that have chosen this
option would be provided with an open book meeting in
place of the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization.
Property owners who are not satisfied with the outcome
of the open book meeting may appeal to the County
Board of Appeal and Equalization and/or to Tax Court.
Option 2: Transferring local board duties to the
county
Previously, the only option for transferring the local
board duties to the county board meant that the local
jurisdiction had to give up its local assessor as well.
Some jurisdictions saw this option as a loss of control,
and therefore, it wasn't considered to be an option for
the city or town.
The quorum and training requirements for local boards
were implemented to improve the local board process so
that the boards function fairly and objectively. The intent
of the legislation was not to force or require a city or
town to give up its local assessor. However, a
jurisdiction that fails to meet these requirements must
transfer the duties of the Local Board of Appeal and
Equalization to the County Board of Appeal and
Equalization. In this situation, the jurisdiction would
lose the right to hold its local board, but it would be able
to retain its local assessor.
It seems unfair that a jurisdiction which voluntarily
transfers its Local Board of Appeal and Equalization
duties to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization
must give up its local assessor, while a local board that
must transfer its duties to the county board for failing
to meet the training or quonnn requirements may retain
its local assessor.
Explanations of alternate methods of appeal
B
It seems appropriate that the local jurisdiction be given
the opportunity to decide to forego its right to act as a
Local Board of Appeal and Equalization and still
maintain its local assessor. If the town board or city
cOlUlcil deems that property owners would be best
served with an open book meeting, which also would
relieve the board from having to make difficult value
and classification decisions, the board or council
should contact the county assessor and inform him/her
of the jurisdiction's intent to be treated as though it did
not meet the quorum or training requirements. It
should clarify that the city or town is transferring its
duties to the county board, but will retain its local
assessor. The town board or city council must notify
~he county assessor of this decision in writing by
December 1 to be effective for the folloWing
assessment year.
Property owners in a jurisdiction that has chosen to
transfer its Local Board of Appeal and Equalization
duties to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization
would be provided with an open book meeting in place
of the local board Property owners who are not
satisfied with the outcome of the open book meeting
may appeal to the COlUlty Board of Appeal and
Equalization and/or to Tax Court.
. Appendix
Glossary
The local board can be reinstated by resolution of the
governing body of the city or town and upon proof of
compliance with the training requirements. The
resolution and proof of compliance must be provided
to the county assessor by December 1 to be effective
for the following assessment year.
Special Boards of Appeal and Equalization
The governing body of a city (including cities with
charters that provide for a board of equalization) may
appoint a Special Board of Appeal and Equalization.
The city may delegate to the Special Board of Appeal
and Equalization all of the powers and duties of the
Local Board of Appeal and Equalization.
The special board serves at the direction and
discretion of the appointing body, subject to the
restrictions imposed by law. The appointing body
shall determine the number of members of the board,
the compensation and expenses to be paid, and the
term of office of each member.
At least one member appointed to the Special Board
of Appeal and Equalization must be an appraiser,
realtor or other person familiar with property
valuations in the assessment district.
Abatement - Reduction of estimated market value,
taxes, costs, penalties or interest which have been
erroneously or unjustly paid.
Adjourn - The final closing of a meeting, such as a
meeting of the board of directors or any official
gathering. Adjourn is not to be confused with
"recess," which means the meeting will break and
then continue at a later time.
Agricultural property - Property including the house,
garage, farm buildings and farm land used for raising or
cultivating agricultural products. Defmed in Minnesota
Statutes as Class 2a agricultural homestead or Class 2b
agricultural non-homestead property.
Apartment property - Residential real estate containing
four or more units and used or held for use by the owner or
by the tenants or lessees of the owner as a residence for
rental periods of 30 days or more. Defmed in Minnesota
Statutes as Class 4a rental housing.
fI
Appendix
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO CONSIDER CHANGING THE ANNUAL BOARD OF
APPEALS AND EQUALIZATION PROCESS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen City Council will hold a public
hearing on Monday, November 27,2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at
7700 Market Boulevard, to consider changing the current process used by Board of
Appeals and Equalization to review and correct market valuations and classifications in
the city. Rather than the City Council holding a public hearing to review appeals, it is
proposed that the County Assessor conduct an "open book" process that allows residents
to work directly with the County Assessor and County Board on valuation and
classification appeals.
All interested persons may appear and express their opinions regarding this proposed
change at said time and place. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact City
Hall.
Todd Gerhardt
City Manager
Phone: 952-227-1119
(Published in the Chanhassen Villager on November 23,2006)
/1 / 1- / f -#-'2
/1flacVl~~i1 ;_
--