The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-02_CRESTVIEW (REPLAT OF SHIVELY ADDITION)CITY OF CgMSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.221.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Flnaae Phone: 952227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952227.1120 Far: 952227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone. 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952227.1300 Fax 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn,us August 10, 2006 Mr. Peter Knaeble Terra Engineering 6001 Glenwood Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55422 Dear Peter, The revised landscape plan for Crestview development received by the city on 07/24/06 is not acceptable. The following changes need to be made: 1. A minimum of two trees are required within the front yard setback area of each lot. Lots 2, 3 and 4 do not meet this requirement. 2. No more than one-third of the total trees to be planted may be from any one species. Black Hills spruce accounts for 60% of the trees proposed. 3. No trees may be planted within the Right -of -Way. Lot 1 shows evergreens within the street ROW. A revised landscape plan must be submitted to the city for approval. If you have any questions concerning these issues please contact me. �n!($aiWrf ��t� Environmental Resources Specialist The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geal place to live, work, and play. Terra Engineering, Inc. 0" CMI f}gllriel g L&-4 RX"rig • cat ut TRANSMITTAL TO: RECERTM JUL 2 4 2006 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RE: We are sending you trached Under separate cover via COPIES DATE NO. DATE: 7// to li FILE: DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: or your approval For your information For your review & comment REMARKS: COPY TO: GIL l� ENCLOSED: The following items: As requested TRANS. ONLY 6001 Glenwood Avenue • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 • 763 593 9325 • Fax: 763 512 0717 FERFIA ENGINEEr!N( !N. t.t�t't`CciCIOp vy Per S�L11 ��,_ yr�r 10 /04 4 v i \ u GRADING LI 1T/o, STYPE 1 SIL C5 FENCE (SES.-- o i DETAIL a3�) X / HS hop \ \ HS �\ INSTALL- - \\ 0 P7 WFq - — I-- - - ...... ...... �..:., I' LANDSCAPE NOTES: No. of replacement trees required '9 tra< ter r.dr_•r, Max. number of trees/species 1/3 of t Jol Miry % of e-nlfer, -`0% Deciduous tree size ; ci ovg , 1.5 c rrr.-1 Coniferous tree size aag,, 6' min Trees shall be from certified nursery defined and controlled by MN Statute 18 44 3 61, the Plant Pest Act_ COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME White Pine/Pinus strobus r'een Prt; - s`7 Pur je.ic �-F "'111 � #.`. ; Ease.." _ -r J�i — -0.-•' �� - tis. �, - e 1 -'� CRESTVIEW DRIVE HS - 01 - x J S Ici PROP. MIN. CODE QTY. SIZE n r` =2Lw a W CL U 0 Uj w CL C•J r - o ` C m C o o w a n.o-0o l N U O a._ = N m J 0/ a Cc j 6 tQ`- oc v a o c c V OTE > 3 E a v o L � r aaD 0 z N N z V r•i Q WARNING 04-108 u7 SHALL CONTA"T -i.- PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR R') O � � O O f• C (n C N O X W C �:` 1 Q j Q lL C_ I— I I Q U z O W Q N w m E °) N o n M C7 m O) tJ i N If) ? 4 O c M a W CL U 0 Uj w CL C•J r - o ` C m C o o w a n.o-0o l N U O a._ = N m J 0/ a Cc j 6 tQ`- oc v a o c c V OTE > 3 E a v o L � r aaD 0 z I i ..= 30 SCALE z DA TE 4./7/05 PROJECT NO Q WARNING 04-108 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTA"T -i.- PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR SHEET NO. LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUNt RES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLE, VALVES W W I N tl C . r - l E THE. A.B'-'vE `NHE- N Q W CONSTRIJCT!i_. �:` 1 U j Q U) I— I I Q U z Z W Q Q _ � E v v \ W tJ i 1 ? 4 I i 30 SCALE S 30 60 1N FEET DA TE 4./7/05 PROJECT NO WARNING 04-108 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTA"T -i.- PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR SHEET NO. LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUNt RES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLE, VALVES 30 SCALE S 30 60 1N FEET DA TE 4./7/05 PROJECT NO WARNING 04-108 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTA"T -i.- PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR SHEET NO. LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUNt RES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLE, VALVES OR OTHER Bi '-,TRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL_ REPA' . r - l E THE. A.B'-'vE `NHE- N DAMAGED DURING CONSTRIJCT!i_. �:` 1 THS --`NNC: R. 08/17/2005 13:22 FAX LC710 CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Attorneys at Law 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 FAX: (651) 452-5550 FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 17, 2005 PLEASE IMMEDIATELY DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGE(S) TO: NAME: Alyson Morris Chanhassen - Engineering NAME: Bob Generous Chanhassen - Planning SENDER: SUE NELSON Chanhassen City Attorney's Office FAX NO. (952) 227-1170 FAX NO. (952) 227-1110 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: 2 (INCLUDING COVER PAGE). IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL SUE NELSONAT (651) 234-6222. RE: CRESTVIEW (Lecy Bros. Construction, Inc.) COMMENTS: Attached for your files please find copy of confirmation of plat filing. ❑ ORIGINAL TO NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY The information contained in and transmitted with this facsimile is Z 001/002 I. SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE; 2. ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT; OR 3. CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination. distribution, copying or use of or reliance upon the information contained in or transmitted with this facsimile by or to anyone other than the recipient designated above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this facsimile in error, please notify CAMPBELL KNUTSON BY TELEPHONE AT (651) 452-5000 IMMEDIATELY. Any facsimile erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately returned to the sender by U.S. Mail or, if authorization is granted by sender. destroyed. 08/17/2005 13:22 FAX LC710 zoo-, oo-� CAMPBELL KNUTSON Profeesional Assocladon Attorneys at Law 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 FAX: (651) 452-5550 FILING OF DOCUMENTS TO: X COUNTY RECORDER REGISTRAR OF TITLES Please complete, date, and sign this form upon assigning document numbers for the documents listed below and return completed form to SUE NELSON a( lite Chanhassen City Attorney's office at the address shown above. A self-addressed envelope is provided for your convenience- CLIENT/MATTER: City of Chanhassen — Crestview Developer: Lecy Bros. Construction, Inc. THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT(S) Abstract Torrens WERE FILED: Document No. Document No. Resolution No. 2005-61 l9q,2116 Plat ya i& Consent to Plat (Wells Fargo Bank) awla / Consent to Plat (State Bank of Long Lake) Consent to Plat (National City Mortgage Co.) Development Contract 19 y.2// 7,? Permanent Trail Easement (Lot 2, Block 1) Permanent Trail Easement (Lot 3, Block 1) C Permanent Trail Easement (Lot 4, Block 1) atm- o'clock A.M�on 2005, with the County Recorder / Registrar of Titles of Carver County, MN. SIGNED: �7- -�C C t 1. (?`�?✓b'�J Bh SU Y e Thankyou! 120223 Building Inspections On May 9, 2005, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: Phone: 952.227.1160 May 12, 2005 MY OF Mr. Andrew Johnsrud Engineering Lecy Bros. Homes CgANgASSEN 15012 Highway 7 Fax: 952.227.1170 Minnetonka, MN 55345 7700 Markel Boulevard PO Box 141 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Final Plat Approval — Crestview Addition 2, Planning Case #05-02 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Dear Mr. Johnsrud: Building Inspections On May 9, 2005, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: Phone: 952.227.1160 Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1190 The Final Plat for Crestview Addition creating five lots and associated right-of-way Engineering for public streets (plans prepared by Terra Engineering, Inc.) with a five-foot front Phone: 952.227.1160 yard setback variance for Lots 1 and 5 subject to the following conditions: Fax: 952.227.1170 easement for the sidewalk within Lots 3 and 4. Finance 1. The developer shall include a sidewalk along the south side of the extension of Phone: 952.227.1140 Crestview Drive and a trail from the end of the cul-de-sac between Lots 2 and 3 Fax: 952.227.1110 to the school property located west of the site. The developer shall provide an Park a Recreation easement for the sidewalk within Lots 3 and 4. Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 2, The developer shall dedicate a 20 foot trail easement and construct an 8 foot Recreation Center wide trail from Crestview Drive to the west property line between Lots 2 and 3, 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1466 Block 1 to accommodate the pedestrian access to the Middle School site. Fax: 952.227.1404 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Planning s Natural Resources Division before building permits will be issued. g Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 4. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. Public Works 1591 Park Road 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs Phone: 952.227.1300 must either be removed from site or chipped. Fax 952.227.1310 Senior Center 6. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, Phone: 952.227.1125 trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. Fax: 952.227.1110 This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by Web She firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. wxw.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 7. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Temporary street signs shall be installed on each street intersection when construction of the new roadway allows passage by vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. A minimum of two overstory deciduous trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Mr. Andrew Johnsrud May 12, 2005 Planning Case 05-02 - Crestview Addition Final Plat Page 2 8. A minimum of two overstory deciduous trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. 9. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. 10. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. 11. All trees shown as preserved and outside of the grading limits as shown on plans dated 04/07/05 shall be saved. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 13. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. 14. Construction site access points shall be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. 15. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. 16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff -Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), and Minnesota Department of Health) and 030OA58 Time Type of (maximum time an area can remain unvegetated Slope when area is not actively being worked) Steeper than 3:1 7 Days 10:1 to 3:1 14 Days Flatter than 10:1 21 Days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 13. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. 14. Construction site access points shall be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. 15. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. 16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff -Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), and Minnesota Department of Health) and 030OA58 Mr. Andrew Johnsrud May 12, 2005 Planning Case 05-02 - Crestview Addition Final Plat Page 3 comply with their conditions of approval. 17. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 18. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. 19. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 20. In conjunction with the final plat approval, the developer shall vacate the existing Crestview Drive right-of-way dedicated as part of the Shively Addition. 21. Park fees, in the amount of $16,000.00, shall be paid prior to recording the final plat. 22. A temporary diversion berm shall be installed along the north edge of the property to divert run-on from the north (Murray Hill Road) to the west to keep the storm water in existing vegetated areas. 23. The applicant shall work with staff to locate CB -2 in an area that will optimize its effectiveness in intercepting runoff from the north (Murray Hill Road). 24. Silt fence shall be installed curbside following street paving and shall be maintained in place during home construction. 25. A detail for inlet control of CB -2 and CB -43A shall be provided since the proposed Wimco inlet control will only work for CB -1. The applicant shall work with staff to select the most appropriate inlet control (possibly a Wimco-type inlet control to fit the round casting or heavy duty mono -mono silt fence with 4 foot spacing of metal T -posts and a 2 foot high, 2 foot wide 1 1/2 inch clear rock berm around the silt fence)." Two signed mylar copies of the final plat shall be submitted to our office for signatures along with the signed development contract, the required easements (trail) and all required financial security and fees. Two I "=200' scale mylar reductions of the final plat and one 1"=200' scale mylar reductions of the final plat with just street names and lot and block numbers shall be submitted. In addition, a digital copy in Axf format and a digital copy in .tif format (pdf compatible) of the final plat shall be submitted. Mr. Andrew Johnsrud May 12, 2005 Planning Case 05-02 - Crestview Addition Final Plat Page 4 Please note that as a condition of plat approval you are required to vacate the existing street right-of-way for Crestview Drive platted as part of the Shively Addition. It takes approximately one month to process the vacation request. The City will submit all the necessary documents to Carver County for recording of the subdivision. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (952)227-1131. Sincerel , Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner c: Paul Oehme, City Engineer/Public Works Director Steve Torell, Building Official g:\plan\2004 planning cases\05-02 Cmwiew\appnaval letter fp.dm Administration Re: Preliminary Plat Approval — Crestview Addition P 221100 Fax: Phone: 952.227.1100 Planning Case #05-02 Building Inspections Dear Mr. Johnsrud: Phone: 952.227.118 March 21, 2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Mr. Andrew Johnsrud Engineering I ecy Bros. Homes 7700 Market Boulevard 15012 Highway 7 PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Administration Re: Preliminary Plat Approval — Crestview Addition P 221100 Fax: Phone: 952.227.1100 Planning Case #05-02 Building Inspections Dear Mr. Johnsrud: Phone: 952.227.118 - Fax: 952227.1190 Fax: 952.227.1310 On March 14, 2005, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: Engineering must either be removed from site or chipped. P:52222Z1 Fax: 952.227.1170 Fax:952.227.1170 A five -lot subdivision (preliminary plat), plans prepared by Terra Engineering, Fax: 952.227.1110 Inc., dated 11/22/04, revised 12/7/04, 2/21/05, and 2/28/05, and subject to the Finance following conditions: Phare: 952.227.1140 This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by Fax 952227.1110 1. The developer shall include a sidewalk along the south side of the extension of Park 6 Recreation Crestview Drive and a trail from the end of the cul-de-sac between Lots 2 and 3 Phone: 952.227.1120 to the school property located west of the site. The developer shall provide an Fax: 952.227.1110 easement for the sidewalk within Lots 3 and 4. Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227 1400 2. The developer shall dedicate a 20 foot trail easement and construct an 8 foot Fax: 952.227.1404 wide trail from Crestview Drive to the west property line between Lots 2 and 3, Planning It Block 1 to accommodate the pedestrian access to the Middle School site. Natural Resources Phone: 952227.1130 3. A final grading plan and soils report must besubmitted to the Inspections Fax: 952.227.1110 Division before building permits will be issued. Public Works 1591 Park Road 4. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs Senior Center must either be removed from site or chipped. Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 6. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, Web She trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. www.ci.chanhassen mous This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 7. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Temporary street signs shall be installed on each street intersection when construction of the new roadway allows passage by vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gieal place to live, work, and play. 0 Mr. Andrew Johnsrud March 21, 2005 Crestview Addition Preliminary Plat Page 2 0 8. A minimum of two overstory deciduous trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. 9. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. 10. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. 11. All trees shown as preserved and outside of the grading limits as shown on plans dated 11/22/04 shall be saved. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (maximum time an area can remain unvegetated when area is not actively being worked) Steeper than 3:1 7 Days 10:1 to 3:1 14 Days atter than10:1 21 Da s These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 13. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. 14. Construction site access points shall be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. 15. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. 16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff -Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase 11 Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), and Minnesota Department of Health) and comply with their conditions of approval. Mr. Andrew 7ohnsrud • March 21, 2005 Crestview Addition Preliminary Plat Page 3 17. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Submit storm sewer sizing calcs and drainage map for staff review and approval at time of final plat. 18. On the grading plan: a. Add a note to remove the existing driveway access of Lot 1. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Add a legend. 19. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 20. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. 21. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 22. In conjunction with the final plat approval, the developer shall vacate the existing Crestview Drive right-of-way dedicated as part of the Shively Addition. 23. Full park fees shall be collected at the rate in force at the time of final plat." 24. The applicant will work with staff to shift the cul-de-sac to the east. 25. Add the following City Detail Plates: 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 2001, 2002, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 3101, 3102, 5200, 5203, 5214, 5215, 5300, 5301, and 5302A. 26. The applicant will grant an extension for decision on the variance until final plat returns for approval." The variance request for the front yard setback is being held in abeyance until final plat. In order for the City to approve the setback variance, you must show that the front yard setback variance will lead to additional tree protection as well as not having a negative impact on the street appearance, especially the crowding of the houses at the cul-de-sac. Final plat documents must be submitted to the City three weeks prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat approval. Mr. Andrew Johnsrud March 21, 2005 Crestview Addition Preliminary Plat Page 4 Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1131. Sincere Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure ec: Matt Saam, Assistant City Engineer Steve Torell, Building Official g:\plan@004 planning cases\04-36 - pinehm6appmval lett"Am 0 0 ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION 6/9/04 The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of three (3) weeks prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: Submit three (3) sets of construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWLS and HWLS, catch basin, and storm manhole numbers. 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 4. Trail Easements (if applicable). 5. Landscape Plan and Cost Estimates (Woodland Management Plan, if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Public hnprovements: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. C. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. L Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading 7. Ten (10) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (81h" x 11"), a digital copy in Awg format (AutoCAD compatible), and a digital copy in .tif format. 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc or .pdf compatible format. 9. Lot tabulations 10. 1" = 200' scale paper or mylar reduction of the final plat with just street names and Lot and Block numbers. Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. g:tengVom V alplat submittal.dx CiTY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION Application of Lecy Bros. Homes for Subdivision approval to create five lots with a variance to the street standards to provide 50 -foot right-of-way — Crestview, Planning Case No. 05-02. On January 4, 2005, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at it's regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Lecy Bros. Homes for preliminary plat approval of property with variances. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential District, RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential — Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: Outlot A, Shively Addition. 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance with a setback variance to improve tree preservation; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage; f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record, but shall provide all required easements; and •CANNED g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 5. VARIANCE FINDINGS SUBDIVISION a. The hardship is not a mere inconvenience, but is used to enhance tree preservation. b. The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or typographical conditions of the land. c. The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property. The right-of-way width for the extension of Crestview Drive is consistent with the existing roadway width. d. The granting of the variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of the subdivision ordinance, the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 6. VARIANCE FINDINGS - SETBACK a. The literal enforcement of the ordinance creates a hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. The proposed setback variance enhances tree preservation. c. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but to facilitate tree preservation. d. The hardship is not self-created by the developer, but due to the fact that the applicant is attempting to preserve contiguous areas of trees at the perimeter of the development. 0 0 e. The variance if approved will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. The planning report #05-02, dated January 4, 2005, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat with a variance for the street right-of-way width and deny the front yard setback variance. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 401 of January, 2005. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: '--�CC Its Chairman gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-02 crestview\f ndings of fact.doc City Council Meeting — May rI, 2005 h. Resolution#2005-46: Approval of Proclamation Recognizing the Chanhassen American Legion and Proclaiming May 15`s as Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 Day. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. CRESTVIEW FINAL PLAT AND APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT, PROJECT 05-11. Tim Larkin: Mr. Mayor, council members. I'd like to begin by just briefly reading a letter to put on the record the items of concern that I have over the Crestview project. I appreciate the fact that you've removed the project from the consent agenda so that I might briefly address you. A great deal of effort has gone into this project on the part of the city staff and the developer in order to make it work for all parties and I appreciate their efforts. City staff has a difficult job to do, as do each of you. There's only one item that we remain divided over and that's the inclusion of the pedestrian walkway to the junior high school. After meeting last week with city staff a recommendation remains to keep the access trail and it seems to be for two reasons. A, the comprehensive plan calls for connection to parks and the junior high school has been deemed a park. B, due to the possibility that the school district will begin charging residents of Chanhassen who live within 2 miles of the middle school for transportation. Therefore pedestrian access to the school is increasingly important. While I certainly appreciate the city's concern for these two issues I would like to submit that the currently approved access points more than accommodate each of these concerns. As you review the map of access points to the school, which I'll hope to do in this ... you'll see that the Crestview access would be only 50 yards from the previously approved Plowshares access, or Pinehurst access. And it would be 166 yards from the existing access on Murray Hill Road. It's my hope that the council will agree that the 3 access points within 200 yards of each other is redundant and unnecessary. Clearly removing the Crestview access point would not create a hardship for pedestrians, runners or bikers in the Chanhassen area. Simply reviewing the map of residents in the surrounding area reveals that a vast majority of residents, both existing and proposed, would have their nearest access to the junior high via Plowshares or the Murray Hill access. Both the physical distance and the walking routes are shorter to these access points than would be the case for Crestview. Given these facts I'm asking you to remove the pedestrian access trail from the Crestview project. Doing so will ensure that my family of 5 will be able to enjoy the private end of the line cul-de- sac that we believed that we were purchasing 6 months ago. My 3, 7 and 10 year olds will be able to safely ride their bikes in a cul-de-sac. There will be no possibility of this cul-de-sac becoming a drop off or a pick up point for the convenience of those attending the middle school for either school or for summer rec activities. Indeed without this pedestrian trail there would be no car traffic in the cul-de-sac except for those who live there. This doesn't seem like too much to ask, does it? And I submitted that respectfully yours. I'd like to just share some additional data with you that I gathered this week. I don't know how well you can see that. 3 questions to simply ask the council to consider. Is it necessary to create 3 access points within 200 yards of each other? Where is the hardship created by using only the 2 approved and existing points. Why demand a third access point and create an unnecessary safety concern for an existing homeowners, yours truly. I'd like to share with you the chart. There are 3 cul-de-sacs or cul-de- sac, yeah all three are cul-de-sacs that would be affected by this decision. Addressing each from the standpoint of either convenience by being able to access the park, or in the case of the school 3 City Council Meeting — May 9, 2005 district, making that decision to charge residents for busing, how that might affect residents on those 3 cul-de-sacs was an issue. These days odometers on vehicles don't have 2 digits for tenths of a mile so you'll have to forgive me but from Whitetail Ridge Court, which is the furthest out from Crestview, the furthest north along Galpin, from Crestview, it would be 4/10 of a mile from the deepest point in that cul-de-sac to the existing Murray Hill access. You would also be 4/10 of a mile to the proposed Crestview access. There are 7 homes in Whitetail Ridge Court that would be affected by that. Again, not creating any advantage from the current Murray Hill Court. They have very adequate access to parks currently. They have very adequate access to the school should the need for transportation become an issue. On Crestview Circle, which is across Galpin on the east side of Galpin directly east of Crestview Drive, it is currently 4/10 of a mile to Murray Hill access, and I know that seems difficult to believe. Frankly it seemed difficult to me. That's why I measured it literally 3 times. It has to do with how deep those cul- de-sacs are. They vary in their depth. The Crestview Circle is not a very deep cul-de-sac and it's 4/10 of a mile to the Murray Hill access currently. It would be 3/10 of a mile, which was hard for me to believe living on Crestview Drive, it would be 3/10 of a mile to the proposed Crestview Drive access, creating a very slight advantage by putting that access there. There are 5 homes in that cul-de-sac that would be affected by that. 65a' Street which is one block to the north and on the west side of Galpin has a total of 8 homes. It currently has 4/10 of a mile to get to the Murray Hill access by going out and around. Frankly I think most of those children would go up and cut through the yard, but if they took the long way, they'd go out to Galpin and around, it would be 4/10 of a mile for them to get there. 4/10 of a mile for them to go the other direction through to the Crestview access. And I'd like to point out that portions of those roads obviously are not there currently. City staff was good enough to help me estimate the distances that would be required, so I simply would submit that to the council for your consideration. We purchased the home in September. We certainly knew that there would be development around the home. What we didn't realize is that the council would require interconnection of both of those roads. I think without this access point to the school, that interconnection of roads really does not pose us a great deal of hardship because without that access point there would be no car traffic back to the end of the line. There really is no need for it. For anyone who doesn't live there. My concern is, and again I have 5 children like several of you do. My concern is it would be very difficult for me to send my kids out into that cul-de-sac with the knowledge that cars would be dropping kids off in that cul-de-sac during summer rec programs. If the council had some way of assuring me, and I realize that you don't. If the council had some way of assuring me that pedestrian traffic and bikers and runners would be the only folks accessing that trail, I'd have no difficulty with that at all. My concern is that it creates a car magnet and I think that's unfair. So with that I appreciate your time and I'd entertain any questions. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Larkin? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Mr. Mayor. Mayor Furlong: Yes. Councilwoman Tjomhom: I think if maybe staff could address the, Mr. Larkin's issues. That he raised... 112 City Council Meeting — Mayyl 2005 n �J Kate Aanenson: Sure. The history on the 2, the 3 access points and the first one to come in was actually Crestview and that's our preferred access. At that point the Pinehurst subdivision came in and that was really, is not as, the grades are a little bit more challenging so if we were to drop an access, the staff, and I believe the Park and Rec would recommend that the Crestview be the primary access. That's really at grade. It's a better access, so if there's too many, the Pinehurst one really kind of gets, to make sure that both properties were treated the same is requiring an access, but really the grades work better off the Crestview one. And so that would be our first choice for an access. Tim Larkin: Just one additional comment to that, and I appreciate Kate's perspective. Just, I know you've had a lot of projects and just so for your memory, the reason that, and my understanding from the last time this was considered, the reason that the Pinehurst or the Plowshares folks were required to put in that access was I believe I owe a debt to Councilman Labatt who pointed out that there are 43 homes in that proposed subdivision and they would have no access through their subdivision to the junior high school, and Kate is correct that it was a little trickier to provide access on their side of the development but 43 homes versus 5 homes, I think Councilmember Labatt pointed out that that seemed very unfair to create a problem in our cul-de-sac that was created by 43 homes. Again, I understand staff's concern for the issues of grade. I also understand from meeting with staff that the reason that the method of access was chosen in the Pinehurst subdivision was stairs. And rather than a switchback, which would be ADA compliant, the reason that was given to me is that that school district was not willing to give up that much land, which again seems very unfair. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, I'd just add a little more history to it. We also moved the location based on Mr. Larkin's request. We had a different alignment that worked better and we did move it so it had been moved from the original proposal that came forward with the Crestview, which was closer to your home. So it was moved, and we did put sidewalks in for the kids to ride their bikes so there's that opportunity too. Tim Larkin: That's correct, and again I don't want to give the impression that you haven't tried. The city staff and council hasn't tried to improve the project. You certainly have, although it seems incredulous to me that a subdivision with 43 homes could have come in without access and that we could have been deemed the primary access point. I think Councilmember Labatt was exactly correct. That would have shifted the problem from that subdivision over to our's, and again I don't think that's overly generous to rectify that inequity. But thank you. Mayor Furlong: Alright, thank you. Any other questions or thoughts or comments? Well I guess just in general I appreciate Mr. Larkin's comments and thoughts and involvement. As Kate Aanenson said, what we originally I think has been improved tremendously and with the connections there. One of the concerns, and we do hear it from time to time, that you put a trail in off my road there's going to be more traffic. One of the benefits of having multiple access points is it mitigates that potential. So it's, I think we've made some improvement here. Mr. Larkin's been involved in this process right along, which has been good and that's helped improve both the Pinehurst development down to the south of this property as well as Crestview. I guess my position is still I think it's better overall to have that access there off of Crestview, and notwithstanding the comments made earlier. 5 0 0 City Council Meeting — May 9, 2005 Councilwoman Tjomhom: Mr. Mayor is there any way we could somehow, if this does pass, that it could be monitored so if Mr. Larkin does feel that the traffic is excessive, or it is a hazard, you know it can be looked into further. Does that ever happen where those trails are monitored at all for excessive traffic or dangerous conditions? Mayor Furlong: I'll defer to staff on that question. Todd Gerhardt: Well we have one other one that does access the middle school and has been a concern with the people in that cul-de-sac but it's typically been during school hours when we drop, some parents have dropped kids off there. But you know that's what it's there for. I think that may have improved a little bit with how they're realigned the drop off at the middle school this past 2 years ago. It would get so congested at the middle school, parents were looking at other means of dropping their kids off and they would go and access the cul-de-sac on Spring Court. But with their access points, that's what they're used for and usually people that drive in the cul-de-sacs, I live on one. They're usually going pretty slow. They're looking out for children because there's children all over in this community, and so it's not a practice that we've had where we've closed off an access after we put it in. Tim Larkin: Mr. Mayor, I think in Brenden Court what they did was, put up no parking signs. It doesn't alleviate the concern of dropping off and picking up, dropping off and picking up. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Todd Gerhardt: It's an enforcement issue. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any other questions? Councilman Labatt: I'll just re -state my point to Mr. Larkin's. I just don't think it's fair to put somebody else's problem on another property owner so I would support pulling item, or removing condition number one again and I don't know if I have enough support for it though but. Councilman Lundquist: Steve to use your logic, if you don't have that access point there, then those homes are going to be shifting to another access point. Councilman Labatt: Well it's kind of like how when I grew up in Minnetonka and when I walked to the bus stop, and I lived on a cul-de-sac, we just cut through the yards and the local people don't mind your neighbors cutting through your yards that went to the parks, but we do mind, at least my parents did and I did, when the folks 3 blocks away came down our cul-de-sac and dropped off and they cut through, so I'm taking back 23 years or so and realizing what it was like back in 1974 and it was a problem and I can see a problem now so. Mayor Furlong: Alright, thank you. Is there any other discussion? 6 City Council Meeting — May 2005 0 Councilman Lundquist: I would concur with your thoughts Mr. Mayor that one of the things I think that people value in Chanhassen is access to park and recreation amenities and Minnetonka West Junior High is a large one, one of the larger park and rec amenities that we have in the community and it would be my view that we should provide as many access points to that as we could. And I guess with the nature of Crestview and how that road comes off of Galpin and things like that, I think you have natural roads that make that a little bit more difficult to get in and out of as well to probably mitigate some of that cut through as well, and I'm in favor of leaving the trail there. I think we've done some things to help mitigate some of the concerns there as well, and that would be my view again that we provide as many access points to those park and rec amenities as we can feasibly do. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Any other comments? Councilman Peterson: No, I would agree with Councilman Lundquist totally. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Anyone else? If not, is there a motion? Councilman Lundquist: I would move that we approve item 1(c)1 and 2 as published in the staff report. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is there a second? Councilman Peterson: Second. Mayor Furlong: Made and seconded. Any discussion on the motion? Hearing none we'll proceed with the vote. Councihnan Lundquist moved, Councilman Peterson seconded that the City Council approve the final plat, construction plans and specifications and development contract, Project 05-11 as presented. All voted in favor, except Councilman Labatt who opposed and the motion carried with a vote of 4 to 1. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: Jim Broughton: I'm Jim Broughton, 6927 Highover Court North. Mr. Mayor, council members, if I could talk about the Lake Harrison development. I believe, hopefully you've all received my e-mails and mail so I think it was May 4`" and May 6`s. Things that we see that are concerns. Mayor Furlong: Sir what I'll ask, if you don't mind, we'll have an opportunity for public comment during that, so why don't we take it up so we're getting it in context with the rest of the information, if that's okay with you. Jim Broughton: That's fine, thank you. Mayor Furlong: Anyone else who would like to present an item before the council this evening under visitor presentations? Seeing none, we'll move forward with our next agenda item. OS-�Z City Council Meeting — M• 14, 2005 • VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: None. PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW FOR CRESTVIEW, A FIVE LOT SUBDIVISION WITH VARIANCES (A REPLAT OF THE SHIVLEY ADDITION): LOCATED AT THE END OF CRESTVIEW DRIVE, LECY BROS. HOMES, PLANNING CASE 05-02. Public Present: Name Address Chris Moehrl 7599 Anagram Drive, Eden Prairie Nathan Franzen 1851 Lake Drive West Peter Knaeble Golden Valley Andrew Johnsrud Minnetrista Alan Nikolai 6282 Cartway Lane Doris Nikolai 6570 Galpin Boulevard Mike Byrd 935 East Wayzata Boulevard Kate Aanenson: Thank you. This item appeared before the Planning Commission back in January 4`°. This subdivision was directly tied to the final plat you just gave on the Pinehurst subdivision immediately to the south, this subject here. Obviously the street extension that you approved on the previous subdivision affects this subdivision, so while we're working through those issues, the subdivision, final plat, or preliminary plat was held up. There was some request for variances specifically because Crestview doesn't meet current city standards. Their right-of- way was given a 50 foot, the street was given a 50 foot right-of-way. The pavement width will match the standards that we have but just the right-of-way. With that they were asking for some setbacks from the street. The staff did not support those with the redraw based on the fact there was an additional street preservation. Kind of the two issues that the staff spent a lot of time was on access between Pinehurst, the subdivision to the south and this one was access to the West Junior High School. And as it turns out, both subdivisions are providing access. This subdivision, let me just, this is the applicant's design. We did want a sidewalk to walk to the junior high so the Pinehurst has provided a sidewalk. That sidewalk did move to the east side as opposed to the west side as you get up there, and you'll have to cross. If you could follow along maybe on page 8 where we go through the recommendations of approval. So number 1, the sidewalk along the south side of Crestview and the trail, this is the sidewalk we're talking about right here. So you'd come up this side. Again, the Pinehurst subdivision has been designed to accommodate that. The sidewalk will come up and then cross, so you have the south side here. So our recommendation on that, number one is that with the radius of the curve, the sidewalk doesn't stay and so they need to provide additional easement for that radius. Then the other issue was this trail through here. It needs to be 20 foot wide with a minimum, it does say 10 in there but minimum of 8 foot, and that's because we plow those trails. That's a permanent access to get to the school and those would be maintained. That trail portion would be maintained by the city, whereas the sidewalk is maintained by the homeowners in front of, and so again clarification of those. The responsibility for the development of all those would be the responsibility of the City Council Meeting — M• 14, 2005 • developer, not the city. Included with the development proposal itself. So that's kind of 1, 2, and 3 clarification. If you have any questions on that. Mayor Furlong: Questions right now on those? And I do Kate. Clarification. Does the condition 2, that speaks to the trail easement between Lot 2 and 3. Am I understanding that correctly? Kate Aanenson: That's convect. That's this one here, and it's not shown right on the plan. It needs to be wider. A 20 foot. Mayor Furlong: So is staff recommending that we modify condition 2 to make it says 20 feet? Kate Aanenson: That would be my recommendation. 20 foot, and then clarify. Mayor Furlong: To indicate a 20 foot trail easement. Kate Aanenson: They only wanted to put, they're requesting a 5 foot and again, because we have to plow it, minimum that we'd recommend would be 8. Typically we like to see between 8 and 10, but a minimum of 8 and that's for us to maintain that. Mayor Furlong: But is staff proposing that the developer install the trail as well? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: Is that somewhere else on here? Kate Aanenson: No, I think that maybe should be clarified. Mayor Furlong: To dedicate a trail easement and install a trail? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Dedicate and install. Mayor Furlong: So the easement's 20 feet and the trail is 8? Did you say. Or to standard. To city standards. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. We had recommended 10. We were just talking, I did talk to the Park and Rec Director and to the City Engineer just to clarify that we would allow it to go down to 8. We'd like to see 10 but we'll compromise on that. And I just wanted to also kind of go through, we did agree to the 50 foot there. One of the issues they had with the trail connection was how it would impact similar their concern with the sidewalk in front of the houses, how it would impact these lots. So the sidewalk got moved across and we did agree to let this 50 foot, whereas the subdivision lots is staying with 60. Same pavement width. In order to get the additional width, because they have to push those lots around to get the trail easement, so there was some give on the city's part to make that happen. And since this time with the additional storm water went through that site too, so there's two easements running through there that kind of pushes that a little bit so we did agree to that 50. So with that, 5 lots. We are 4"Was 4 City Council Meeting —1 • 14, 2005 • recommending approval with the conditions in the staff report and I'd be happy to answer any other questions. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any questions for staff? Councilman Lundquist: Kate, the variances that you're recommending denial of. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Those were for front yard variances. We recommended they can fit within. We didn't believe there was any additional tree. We believe giving the 50 foot right-of- way, where here it may not be good, there wasn't any additional tree savings. There is the width to do it. So we didn't support those. Councilman Lundquist: Okay. Mayor Furlong: But if there was that 5 foot variance on the setback, that would be against the 50 foot wide right-of-way rather than the normal setback? Kate Aanenson: Correct, because we already gave them that. Correct, it'd be like a double. Because you can go closer because the street's narrower. So we accomplished it in a different way. You know we felt we gave them that. And there wasn't additional tree savings on the back. Mayor Furlong: Thanks. Other questions? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Don't think so. Mayor Furlong: Okay. We're comfortable, and maybe this is a question for Mr. Oehme with regard to the narrower right-of-way. Any drawback from city standpoint from maintenance or any issues there? It's consistent with the rest of Crestview I understand but are there any drawbacks with us doing that? Paul Oehme: Yeah, we try to maintain 60, at least at a minimum 60 foot right-of-way. In this particular location we only have a few houses associated with this development. The impacts that we see in terms of narrowing the right-of-way down by 10 feet are the underground utilities. Getting access to them, and just boulevard preservation but there really aren't that many utilities out here. To service this area. We don't have any trunk water mains. We don't have any trunk storm sewer systems out here so we're comfortable with the 50 feet in this area. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright. Thank you. Any other questions for staff? If not, is the applicant here this evening? Is there anything you'd like to address to the council? Peter Knaeble: Yes Mr. Mayor, members of the City Council. My name's Peter Knaeble. I'm here representing the developer of the property, Lecy Brothers Homes. Also here tonight is Andy Johnsrud from Lecy Brothers, in case you have any questions for him. Basically we've been again, like Kate said, working on this project since last September with the staff and it's relative straight forward, especially now at this point, or this stage. The kind of the final items City Council Meeting — March 14, 2005 • that we're concerned about and we concur with the staff report other than the issue on the 25 foot front setback, it's our position that granting that variance from that front setback would save an additional 5 foot of trees in the rear of the house given an equal size house. Obviously we just move it up that 5 feet and save that 5 foot of any trees or any grading limit that would be in the rear of the property. So we're still asking for that. We understand the staff's position and we have read the staff report and kind of understand where they're coming from. So obviously from our part it's not a deal breaker if that doesn't happen, but we're still requesting that from the council. The other issue is, again the location of the sidewalk. We understand the location on the south side of the road. Just talking to Andy from Lecy Brothers, I think their position if they'd prefer it on the north side to get away from the 3 new homes and keep it along that longer frontage, but again if it's the staff and council's recommendation to put it per staff, I think Andy would concur that that's okay with them too. So our basic issue is just again to ask for that 25 foot front setback again with that 50 foot it allows a total of 10 foot of additional encroachment from that house. Move it up that 10 feet so we would ask for that. Other than that we concur with the other recommendations in the staff report. Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any questions for the applicant as he sits down. That's okay. Kate, any thoughts or comments? Follow up. Kate Aanenson: Yes. My only concern moving to the other side is, I'm not sure that Mr. Larkin was aware of that change and certainly would give him the opportunity to comment on that. That's a pretty significant change, putting a sidewalk to the other side. Mayor Furlong: And he's the property owner, the existing homeowner? Kate Aanenson: Correct. So that would be our concern there. As far as the 25 foot, I mean this has to come back for final plat. Our initial review is, it's not going to save trees and if they can demonstrate that, we'd go ahead and look at that at time of final plat. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. This was addressed by the Planning Commission back in January. There have been some changes given the development to the south and such like that so if there is someone from the public that would like to make some comments to the council at this time I'd certainly invite them to come forward and address any issues. Council did have an opportunity to review the Planning Commission meeting minutes and so we don't need a repeat of what was said there but if there's new issues or something that's changed that you'd like to make sure the council's aware of, we certainly would be interested in listening to that so, if anybody would like to come forward, please do so now. State your name and address for public comment. Okay, seeing none, that's fine. Why don't we bring it back to council for discussion or any follow up questions. Councilman Peterson: Mr. Mayor, I think it is pretty straight forward and I think if staff can work with the developer to address the sidewalk issue and talk to Mr. Larkin, get his feedback on it, I think he would be a driving force in me making a decision but I think we can allocate that responsibility. Let staff deal with the position of the sidewalk. And the 25 foot setback, as Kate mentioned, I think let them deal with it. If they find that there is a compelling reason to do it, then I'm okay with that. If we have an opportunity to save trees without an aggressive 51 City Council Meeting — March 14, 2005 • deterioration and a good plan, then we should seize that opportunity. Other than that I think it's a good plan. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Other discussion? Councilwoman Tjomhom: I agree with Councilman Peterson. I could go either way with the 25 foot setback. If it saves trees, I think it's a good thing. I guess I'm just happy with the bituminous, yeah. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Councilman Lundquist? Councilman Lundquist: I would concur with Councilman Peterson on the sidewalk as well. To talk to the existing property owner and come back for final. The setback, again put the burden on that on the developer. If they can demonstrate that, especially given the wanting to have an extra buffer between them and the middle school there, as all that activity in the park and things that I can certainly understand why they would want as much buffer and that as possible, so again I think those issues are out there but not that big of a deal to work through between now and final plat, so I'm happy with what I see now and a couple of minor things to look at. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. I would concur on the sidewalk. We need to get Mr. Larkin's thoughts on that. He's most directly affected by that. With regard to the setback I think, I'm coming at it at a little bit different view and that is, of the 5 lots here, there's an existing home on one so we're really dealing with 4 new. Of those 4, 3 of them are on the end of a cul-de-sac. The end of a wide turn around. And so you've got triangle shaped pieces and as you get closer to the street, the houses are going to purposely get very close to each other, and I think from a, you know where the houses are and how crowded they look to the street versus how far set back they are to ... for safety but also just from a design standpoint, I think that'd be something in addition and we want to save trees in the back, but by moving them forward 5 feet, if a future property owner builds a deck or something like that in the back, those trees could be gone anyway. And so I'm concerned about the crowding of the houses at the street at that turn around. I'm not necessarily comfortable with that because we're already dealing with a narrower right- of-way. The cul-de-sac, the pavement area in the cul-de-sac bituminous area with the curbs, that's going to be a normal size cul-de-sac, correct? So we're already. Kate Aanenson: Radius, yeah but we did talk about snow storage. I mean you're right, when you push it forward on a cul-de-sac, the snow storage issue is... Mayor Furlong: Yeah, snow storage and I'm just thinking you're trying to get you've got wedge shaped homes so the houses are coming up physically closer and the proximity of the houses, even with the setbacks I think they might be a jammed a little bit there so that's my concern there on that setback. It's not as bad on Lot 5. That might not be an issue being seen but I think I would be concerned about just the location of the homes on 2, 3 and 4 so at this time I'd want to gain some comfort there and so to me it's more than just trying to save some trees on the back. It's how the development's going to look when homes go in. Councilwoman Tjornhom, sure. 0 0 City Council Meeting —March 14, 2005 Councilwoman Tjornhom: Are those homes then going to have enough room for decks and patios? Is there enough space back there if they are pushed back? Kate Aanenson: Yes. I mean there should be plenty of space. That's a requirement of the box that they showed reasonable building plan. Mayor Furlong: And the lot sizes meet the ordinance in terms of dimensions and. Kate Aanenson: Yeah. There's only one lot that's 15 but they're probably closer to an average of yeah, 24's in here. Yeah. Mayor Furlong: You know and I guess as I'm talking about setbacks, and maybe this is a question for Kate. In the frontage, in the staff report there were a couple, I think it's Lots 2 and 3 that show less than the 90. What is the requirement at a cul-de-sac? It's at the setback right? Kate Aanenson: At the 30 foot setback, that's correct. Mayor Furlong: 30 foot setback. And so do these have that width available? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: Okay. So you know, everything else being said, I don't need to repeat that. I think it's fairly straight forward. I think it's a good development. I know I've got confidence in the builder in terms of building a good quality product. I'm just concerned about crowding, that 25 foot setback might create. Councilman Peterson: Are you comfortable empowering staff to make that decision based upon our comments or not? Mayor Furlong: Well I think you know as it comes back for final, let's take a look what they come back with. But I think to me it's more than just the trees in the back yard. It's the overall development in terms of the location of the homes. So, any other thoughts or comments? Councilman Lundquist: So as a clarification, I think what we're talking about is to move with staffs recommendations on denial of variance and put the sidewalk on the south side and that pending examination or whatever, and then at final we would approve the variance then? Is that what we're talking about, if we decided to. Kate Aanenson: You have to leave it open ended. Councilman Lundquist: Leave it open? Kate Aanenson: Yeah. It is going forward with variances. The sidewalk isn't a variance issue. That's just a design issue. The only variance that would be open ended would be whether or not we're going to save additional trees. So we can get the attorney's opinion but my M City Council Meeting — M• h 14, 2005 • recommendation with variances, if it can be demonstrated that's additional trees and not a negative impact. Roger Knutson: As I understand it you'd be approving the variances subject to them proving at time of final plat that they will save trees. Kate Aanenson: And not have a negative impact on. Roger Knutson: And not have a negative impact. Kate Aanenson: Right. Roger Knutson: On crowding or whatever. Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Mayor Furlong: Yeah, I mean I think the simplest thing would be not to provide the variance in the preliminary plat. If there's a strong desire to do that, then I think we have to put some caveats on it. The simplest thing would just be to deny that 5 foot setback variance on the preliminary and then it's clean. Because the sidewalk, like I said, is a design. If there's a desire to go forward, then I think we have to put some caveats on there. Councilwoman Tjomhom: But Mr. Larkin would certainly be notified. Kate Aanenson: That's what my concern was. He hasn't been notified. Councilwoman Tjomhom: But I'm sure he wasn't here because he thought it was on the other side of the street and so he didn't think there was, yeah. Kate Aanenson: ...that would be my concern. Roger Knutson: Mayor. Maybe a clean way to handle the variance, if you so choose, would be not to make a decision on the variance tonight. Have the applicant provide you in writing before he leaves here tonight a letter granting you extension to consider the variance until the time of final plat approval, and then bring back the variance with the final plat approval. Then you don't have to worry about all the caveats and conditions. But we have to do something because of our time restrictions on acting on these. Mayor Furlong: That would be okay? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, so you'd just actually, if they give you the extra time, when it comes back for final plat, I'm assuming that's, that gives a 60 day extension on the variances. Roger Knutson: Or until the final plat comes back. 0 0 City Council Meeting —March 14, 2005 Mayor Furlong: Alright. Is there other discussion? If not, is there a motion? Does somebody want to. Councilman Peterson: I would move that. Mayor Furlong: You would move that. There are a couple of clarifications I think in our report in terms of some of the conditions so I would suggest we try to struggle through what's. Councilman Lundquist: I'll take a stab. Mayor Furlong: And let's listen if you would Mr. Knutson and make sure we get it right. Councilman Lundquist: I would move that the City Council approve Planning Case 05-02 for a 5 lot subdivision, 5 lot subdivision subject to conditions 1 through, how many was there? I forget exactly. 27 with the deletion of 25. Amended condition number 2. That the developer shall dedicate a 20 foot trail easement and construct an 8 foot wide trail. And that the applicant grant an extension for decision on the variance until final plat returns for approval. Based on the findings of fact attached to this report. Mayor Furlong: Can we require the applicant to grant an extension in our motion? Roger Knutson: No you can't but he just indicated he would. And the findings of fact. Councilman Lundquist: Go along with the variance? Roger Knutson: Yeah. You don't want to act on the findings of fact until. Councilman Lundquist: Such time as the variance. Roger Knutson: Right, because they are for approval of the variance and you don't know whether you are going to... Councilman Lundquist: ...so rescind the findings of fact. Mayor Furlong: And you didn't include in your motion, just for clarification here before a second, did you want to include the statement that the 5 lot subdivision, plans prepared by Terra Engineering with those dates? Councilman Lundquist: Yes, as stated in the staff report. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Thank you. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Mayor Furlong: Made and seconded. Any discussion of the proposed amendments on it? f [I City Council Meeting — h 14, 2005 • Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approves Planning Case 05-02 for a five lot subdivision, plans prepared by Terra Engineering, Inc., dated 11/22/04, revised 12/7/04, 2/21/05, and 2/28/05, and subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall include a sidewalk along the south side of the extension of Crestview Drive and a trail from the end of the cul-de-sac between Lots 2 and 3 to the school property located west of the site. The developer shall provide an easement for the sidewalk within Lots 3 and 4. 2. The developer shall dedicate a 20 foot trail easement and construct an 8 foot wide trail from Crestview Drive to the west property line between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 to accommodate the pedestrian access to the Middle School site. 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 4. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 7. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Temporary street signs shall be installed on each street intersection when construction of the new roadway allows passage by vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. 8. A minimum of two overstory deciduous trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. 9. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. 10. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. 11. All trees shown as preserved and outside of the grading limits as shown on plans dated 11/22/04 shall be saved. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 11 0 0 City Council Meeting — March 14, 2005 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (maximum time an area can remain unvegetated when area is not actively being worked) Steeper than 3:1 7 Days 10:1 to 3:1 14 Days Flatter than 10:1 21 Days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 13. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. 14. Construction site access points shall be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. 15. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. 16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain pen -nits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff -Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), and Minnesota Department of Health) and comply with their conditions of approval. 17. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Submit storm sewer sizing calcs and drainage map for staff review and approval at time of final plat. 18. On the grading plan: a. Add a note to remove the existing driveway access of lot 1. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Add a legend. 19. H importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 20. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of 12 OS -oz Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • Sacchet: We have a motion. Is there a second? Lillehaug: Second. Sacchet: Are there any friendly amendments? Lillehaug: The amendments as I indicated in my comments. Sacchet: Okay. Is that acceptable? Papke: Acceptable. Papke moved, Lillehaug seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01, Sand Companies, Inc., with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report and Commissioner Lillehaug's comments. Ali voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Sacchet: Now it is 10:00 at night. I do want to just pose the question to the commissioners. We will go beyond curfew but I think we can get through them all. Are you willing to stay beyond curfew a little bit tonight? Alright. PUBLIC HEARING: NO. 05-02. Public Present: Name Address Pam Johnson Paul & Rachelle Tungseth Andrew Johnsrud Alan Nikolai Dick Herrboldt Tim Larkin Peter Knibble 2050 Crestview Drive 2051 Crestview Drive Lecy Bros Homes 6282 Cartway Lane, Excelsior 6464 Murray Hill Road Terra Engineering Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Sacchet: Thank you Bob. Rich, questions? Slagle: I just have two. Bob, you refer to the, and if we can put the plat up of the, and then the southern connection. Yeah, there we go. So I am to assume that in hearing you the City Council C_1 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 will be voting on Monday probably on this southern development. What was staff's recommendation to the City Council regarding that road? Generous: We're still recommending the connection. However we did revise the staff report to incorporate the parks commission's recommendation that that be a permanent cul-de-sac on the south side. And then the applicant has addressed that also. They would like, if that's the case, they would like to go to a private street here and continue the trail up there because they do have to extend the sewer up in this area to serve this property, and so it would follow that same easement and alignment. So that's what they're looking at. Slagle: Okay. And if I go back to the development that we saw last time, there were comments made by the citizens of Crestview about the windiness of the road. The narrowness of the road. Is it staff's opinion, now that we are talking about this development, that that poses any concerns you know with an additional 4 or 5 homes, or 6. However many they end up with? Okay. That's all. Sacchet: Questions this side. Kurt. Papke: Yeah. The existing square cul-de-sac here, we show a new curb going here. What, and a removal of the bituminous. What happens to this property here? Does this get, does the city retain ownership of this? Does this get deeded over to the adjacent homeowners? What happens to that land? Generous: It would, the City would retain ownership of it. The abutting property owner could request a vacation of that right-of-way. And then through the public hearing process council would determine whether or not they want to vacate that. And if that was the case, then they would get that land. Sacchet: Dan, Steve, any questions from staff? Keefe: I have two questions. One is in regards to the street going south. That connects to Street B in terns of buffering next to the existing house over there. Is there I didn't see a landscaping plan or anything or berming or anything along that street on the east side of that street. Is there. Generous: Well they did show some deciduous trees along that corridor but no berming. Keefe: Okay. Abight, and then one other question. There was a lot of discussion in the last meeting in the Pinehurst development about parks and I just had a question in regards to the school. Is that, and we were talking well could we just use the school equipment or whatever and utilize that as a park. I mean do we consider that as an option in our park planning? Generous: The Parks Director did give that direction. That that is a facility that's available to the public. Keefe: So it'd be considered as a park. 45 a3�cuas 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Generous: Yeah. But it doesn't have the play facilities but this is also within the service area of Pheasant Hills which is to the east. Keefe: Right, so presumably if the street goes through and you have the sidewalk going through here, even people from Pinehurst development could walk over and utilize the Minnetonka Middle School West. Generous: Yes. Keefe: Thank you. Sacchet: Steve, any questions? I'm a little disoriented and I don't know exactly how to pin this into a question but with dealing with the proposed Pinehurst development, Planning Commission made their recommendation that Street B become a cul-de-sac. Generous: Correct. Sacchet: And now we're looking at this one and this one has a street in it to where we recommended there wouldn't be one, and I'm not quite, how do we reconcile that? Generous: Well your recommendation, that that street connection be eliminated and that becomes part of one of the lots. Sacchet: So it becomes part of the lot so that means the lots all would shift. Generous; Conceivably, or Lot 5 would just get bigger. Because we would have at a minimum a drainage and utility easement and a trail easement over a portion of that. Sacchet: So they could save a few more trees that way right? Generous: Yes. Sacchet: Okay. Yeah, abight. Lillehaug: Would that negate the need for a variance then if that were to happen? The 5 foot front yard variance I guess is... Generous: No, because that's based on the extension of Crestview. Lillehaug: Okay, thanks. Sacchet: Alright. With that I'd like to invite the applicant to come forward and give us your short version of this proposal. Please, if you want to state your name for the record. Peter Knibble: Mr. Chairman, members of the Planning Commission. My name is Peter Knibble with Terra Engineering. We're the civil engineers responsible for the development and C'l 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 we've been working for a number of months with city staff on trying to get this site figured out. And that's the basically the project that we presented tonight is the final version of those meetings that we've come to. With me tonight is Lecy Bros Construction... on the 4 new lots that will be developed as part of this project. Andy Johnsrud is here representing Lecy Brothers so if there's any questions in regards to the building or the ownership or those kind of questions, he's certainly able to answer those. Just a couple of comments. We've reviewed the staff report and obviously we reviewed the project. I've got a colored up board we can show you. It's basically the same information that Bob's presented. The couple issues we're concerned with, and again we were not at the last Planning Commission meeting when Pinehurst was up for approval and we would certainly concur with the Planning Commission's recommendation not to extend that street to the south, and obviously we would just either shift the lots or make that Lot 5 bigger. We support that recommendation wholeheartedly. When we started out we were directed as part of the staff review to provide that connection and we made that accommodation of our plan but again we would certainly support your recommendation not to make that and we understand the neighbors also concur with that. The second item is the connection of the trail to the school to the west and that just came up in the staff report recently as part of our review. It wasn't part of our conversations early on. I think it was just based on a meeting that the staff had with the school. One of the issues we have, I guess the main issue we have is that we see that as a large collector for the 43 homes that were, or we assume are going to be approved by the Pinehurst development. We think it'd be more appropriate to have that trail connection come out of Pinehurst directly onto the middle school property and they have direct access to do that. We understand there's some topography that may limit that or restrict it but our review, it's only a 6 to an 8 foot height of that berm and based on the amount of grading that's going to happen as part of the Pinehurst, it's certainly not an insurmountable problem to have them provide that connection. We certainly think it's more fair and more equitable to have that connection made there as opposed to funneling that traffic through our property and over to the school. So that's the main issue, two issues that we have. Again that trail connection. We would again encourage you to make that recommendation that it be connected through Pinehurst and not through this small 5 lot development, and the second is we support your recommendation on that eliminating that street connection. And with that, either Andy or I are here to make any comments. Or answer any questions. Sacchet: Thank you. Questions from the applicant. Questions from the applicant. I do have a question. Would you still, you would still make a trail connection to the south over the easement. Peter Knibble: Absolutely, yes. Sacchet: You're not debating that part. You'rejust rather not have the connection to the school. Peter Knibble: Correct. Sacchet: Now I do want to clarify with staff because my understanding that the school specifically requested access in that particular location, is that accurate or? Generous: That's what, based on their review of this plan, yes. 47 Planning Commission Meeu'ng — January 4, 2005 • Sacchet: So they specifically asked to be the connection off. Generous: To Crestview. Sacchet: Further there to the north. Not on that south side. Generous: Correct. We sent them both plats. Slagle: So you, if I may Mr. Chair. Sacchet: Go ahead. Slagle: So you sent them the plat that showed the connection from Pinehurst at the end of that cul-de-sac? Generous: Not with a connection, but with the plat adjacent to the property with all the development potential. Slagle: I'm only asking. Generous: They didn't have a connection shown on this one either. Slagle: Sure, I'm with you. I'm with you. Generous: Their comment back to us is they'd like to see the connection there. Slagle: I'm only saying that if you were the school and you saw a plat that had two cul-de-sacs with you know no connection and a road running north to this road, Crestview, you would just naturally say well that's where the trail should go since you have a road going up there, but if you said to them, there's no road going up there. Where would you want the trail connection from those 50 some odd homes to the south? I think they might say it should go off the cul-de- sac to the south. I don't know. Sacchet: That actually poses a question for you, and I'll ask the applicant. Would you be opposed, from your end, to make a connection to the school if there is a direct connection also from the Pinehurst, or are you generally opposed to a connection in every case? Andy Johnsrud: We'd love to see, if the road was to go away, we'd be certainly willing to put a connection from Lots 2 and 3. It's a straight shot right here right to the school. Sacchet: Straight across. Not necessarily up to the north. Andy Johnsrud: ...that makes the most sense. Sacchet: It's the shortest, yeah. M 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Andy Johnsrud: Than shooting all the way up here and across. Because if there is a connection with the road and a trail this way... parents are going to drive up here and drop their kids off. We know it's going to happen so, we'd love to just see no access there and a trail here along Crestview. That could be... Sacchet: Yeah, the Planning Commission made a very strong recommendation based on the neighbor's input. This was definitely more the neighbors driving that. And so at this point to be consistent with the consideration that the Planning Commission did in the recommendation, I'm assuming it's going to be cul-de-saced. Andy Johnsrud: Correct Absolutely.... Slagle: One last point of clarification. We're there also assuming, if I hear you right, that you would do a trail to the school for Crestview, quote unquote, and those who walk up the sidewalk or the trail and then we would have potentially Pinehurst for their, okay. Peter Knibble: That's what we would prefer. Slagle: Okay. Andy Johnsrud: Right, and even to have a sidewalk along this property, we don't think is necessary you know for these 4 homes or 5 homes. You know the trail access here would be plenty fine for that. I don't think that a 4 or 5 foot sidewalk along here is really necessary by any means. Sacchet: Alright. Appreciate your input. This is a public hearing so I'd like to invite anybody who wants to address this item to come forward at this time. State your name and address for the record and let us know what you have to say. Thank you. Dick Herrboldt: Good evening council. My name's Dick Herrboldt and I live at 6464 Murray Hill Road, which is, if you can. Yeah, I'm right, my property is right here. Sacchet: Just north of it. Dick Herrboldt: So I'm adjacent, just adjacent to this development and I'm totally opposed to the proposal for the sidewalk running through here and up this property line. That's going to go right next to my property and there's a tremendous amount of trees in there that are going to wind up getting cut down in order to access a sidewalk, which is in my opinion not needed. I'm opposed to the road, the attachment to the south development primarily because I don't think that the road is wide enough to accommodate the kind of traffic that's going to be going through there. If the sidewalk does go in, that's going to become a point where the builder just stated the people in the development south are going to be dropping their children off to access the school, which is going to cause a major traffic problem in that area. So I am opposed to both the sidewalk and the access. It makes a lot more sense to put the access through here. In my property there is an access to the school currently. One of my neighbors several years ago 49 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • bought a large parcel of property, an access to deed to the city by the water tower for access to the school. That's about a 12-14 foot wide path. I don't know if you're familiar with that. Sacchet: Yes we are. Dick Herrboldt: So if you're going to put an access on the bottom of my property line, it's going to be about 25 feet from an access that's already there, so that doesn't make a lot of sense. Thank you. Sacchet: Appreciate your comments. Anybody else wants to address this item? This is your chance. Seeing somebody, abight. Tim Larkin: Mr. Commissioner and members, I'm Tim Larkin. I live at 2150 Crestview Drive which is the existing home. The only existing home in that proposed cul-de-sac. I guess I'd like to make just a couple of points. Just of note. I received no notice on the last public hearing when the development to the south was considered. I think it's a clerical error that my property is still listed apparently in the computer as Lecy Bros so I received no notice and could make no comment on the last week's hearing. I would just like to concur that if City Council doesn't take the recommendation of the commission and puts that road back in, it will literally be at the end of my driveway. I think it's obvious to all and it's been amply stated by Lecy Brothers that that literally becomes a driveway for the school. 43 homes to the south. 4 homes here. That doesn't seem equitable at all. I believe in the staff report that I received on last week's hearing that there is in fact a recommendation from the commission that there be access from the south. Sacchet: Right, that's correct. Tim Larkin: So it seems to be, as my neighbor has stated, it seems to be redundant to put any access to the school from the east through this cul-de-sac at all, although if the commission deems that essential, I would agree with Lecy that it should go between Lots 2 and 3. I'm being affected on Lot 1 already by the cul-de-sac, which we were aware of when we purchased the property. We were not aware that there was any consideration of a trail going down the western edge of my property. In addition the sidewalk affects us the same way. There's been discussion of having the sidewalk on the north, as well as on the south. Again I don't see that the sidewalk is necessary without that road to the south. Again if the commission deems that a sidewalk is essential, it would seem more equitable to put it on the south edge of that cul-de-sac where it would affect no existing homeowners than my existing property. I would just note very quickly, I believe the commission maybe aware of this. You may not be able to see that. Orient this properly. The access that my neighbors have spoke up there's an existing access to the south. There would be an additional access to the south. You'll have two accesses to the south to the junior high. There are two existing to the north. I've only noted one but there are two existing to the north and there is one existing to the east. So again it seems to put an additional access to the junior high is redundant at best. There's ample access already there. Slagle: If I may though. Can I ask you? Tim Larkin: Sure. 50 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Slagle: If you were a family member on Crestview, how would your kids, say you lived closer to Galpin. How would they get to the middle school? Tim Larkin: They'd walk over one block to I believe it's, and forgive me, I've only been there only 3 months. I believe it's Murray Hill is where the access is. They'd go over one block. Slagle: Or would they cut through? Would they have to go to Galpin and then. Tim Larkin: I'd go down Galpin where there's an existing sidewalk, or trailway along Galpin. They'd take the sidewalk over one block and up to where the existing. Slagle: So go east northwest. Tim Larkin: They would go east to Galpin. Over Galpin and then up. And there's an existing, as I said, there's an existing trailway along Galpin there. Sacchet: Alright. Anything else? Tim Larkin: I believe that's it. Thank you. Sacchet: Thank you sir. I think there was somebody else starting to get up before. Alan Nikolai: My name is Alan Nikolai, 6282 Cartway Lane, Chanhassen. Good evening everybody. I've talked with my mom. She lives at 6570 Galpin Boulevard which is just right down the hill. Corner of Crestview and Galpin. She indicated to me, she's not feeling well tonight so she asked me to speak on her behalf and her name is Doris Nikolai. She does not want to see an extension to Pinehurst to the south at all because of the additional traffic concern on Crestview. Also she supports the bigger lot sizes in this development and, but would not support an additional lot with the vacation of that road. That south road. Sacchet: I don't think that's a concern. Alan Nikolai: She wants to be careful that it does so it doesn't becomes an additional lot gets factored in there. Sacchet: Okay. Alan Nikolai: As far as, and she also does not like the idea of the walkway extension from Pinehurst up to Crestview there. Sacchet: Why? Alan Nikolai: There's some talk about maybe there's, where that road is. That have maybe a walking path there. 51 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Sacchet: Yes, there is definitely concern. Alan Nikolai: It's maybe not to have, not to have that have the Pinehurst have their own access to the school property. In other words, to traffic it back up to Crestview and that type of thing. She said that they should, Pinehurst, that's their development, they should have the access to... Sacchet: That what match what we just touched on. Would you also oppose a connection between the Pinehurst and Crestview, not for the school part but for just the trail? Alan Nikolai: Well that's what that trail would probably be used for though. Would be the primary access would be to the school property. Unless there's another access... Sacchet: Right, that's what we just touched on. Alan Nikolai: I didn't bring that up with her. I can't really comment on that but more common sense I guess on that. At the same time I brought it up to her because I actually used to walk to that school from my mom's house and cut through the yards there you know over 30 years ago. And what I saw here tonight, you know between I think it's Lot 1 and 2, basically you're going straight west out that cul-de-sac would be the logical access you know. It's the most logical without going to the gentleman's property up to the, further to the north, that type of thing and that would be a very logical. Sacchet: Let me just be real clear. You mean the one on the cul-de-sac going straight across or the one going north? Straight across, okay. Just want to be real clear. Alan Nikolai: Right here. That doesn't make sense. This would, you know just to have a ... but have the access available for those residents and also the residents of Crestview to access the property there. Then one other consideration, a vacation of the existing cul-de-sac right here. You know whether or not that goes over to the Paul Wolff, or that used to be Paul Wolff s, consideration may be possibly as a totlot too. Down the road. Being the City does own that property, that might be a consideration just for the Crestview residents. That might have a swing set, sand box type area for the kids. That might be you know that type of thing for a consideration. Also somewhere down the road, I don't know if you can make a recommendation on it because it's not directly tied but at the same time some fore thought there I think would be wise. And that's it. Thank you. Sacchet: Thank you very much sire. Alan Nikolai: Any questions or? Sacchet: I think we're clear. Thank you for your comments. We got another person. Janet, welcome. Janet Paulsen: My name is Janet Paulsen. I live at 7305 Laredo Drive. I just have a comment to make about the 25 foot setback from the street. I know we have private streets to preserve trees. I didn't know we had public street set backs to preserve trees. I think it's a bad precedent to set. 52 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 5 feet isn't going to save that many trees. I think the question is, they're cramming more of a home into a lot. Especially on Lots 2 and 3. Lot 3 has a 54 foot frontage. How far back is that house going to have to be? The statement says, while that may not seem a significant savings now, in the future when homeowners are adding porches, patios, decks or additions, the extra distance from the trees may be enough room so the trees aren't removed. That's a question in the future for the homeowners to face. I don't think we should change our standards for something like that. And therefore I don't think it meets the variance conditions. That can be applied anywhere in Chanhassen and that is a really bad precedence to set. Thank you. Sacchet: Question for staff based on this comment. Does that variance enable an additional lot? Because that seems to be the implication somewhat here. Generous: It's not the lot. They can meet the 30 foot setback. Sacchet: And then follow-up question with, I'm assuming that south road connection goes away because that's what position we took as a commission when we dealt with Plowhurst to the south. Wouldn't that enable to pull back the cul-de-sac a little bit easterly? Just an idea. Alright. Let's keep going. Public hearing is still open. Yes we have some takers. Dick Herrboldt: I wanted to address one other subject and that is the drainage problem that we have. There is a drain on our cul-de-sac that runs into my, right next to my driveway. Sacchet: Now you're talking to the north Dick Herrboldt: I'm talking to the north. I'm talking about this property here. There is a drain in the street located about here. It empties into my property about right here. All the water from the 5 houses in the cul-de-sac up here, the water runs down into the woods and follows this line approximately and runs down into here and that's going to be a substantial amount of water in the spring or after a large rainfall. That was designed originally when our property was built, Curt Ostrom was the builder and that was the design that the watershed district gave him. But now that these houses are being developed back here, there's going to be a substantial amount of water that's going to be running into those lots. Now I talked to the builder before the meeting and he has a drain located here and my suggestion would be that somehow that pipe be lined up up here into my back yard so that water doesn't run over those existing lots. Sacchet: Matt, from your viewpoint, what's the drainage thing here? Saam: It looks like they have it graded to go, it would go around the west side or the rear of Lots 2 and 3. The drainage that this gentleman is speaking of. Sacchet: Would be shifted to the west? Saam: That's the way that it's designed, yeah. To go around the back of the house. Lillehaug: Existing or proposed? 53 Planning Commission Met — January 4, 2005 • Saam: No, on their proposed. Under existing I'm assuming it goes just, it goes right through into Pinehurst. Dick Hentoldt: Yeah it runs right about this direction. Saam: Down to that ravine... Dick Herrboldt: Down the ravine and ultimately, I think there's a drain down there now but it used to go into the lake on 41. So it's going to be a major problem for those houses. Saam: I think we can deal with it with swales and that sort of thing. And in working with the development. Sacchet: So it's something that still would need to be refined at this point. Saam: Minor grading. Sacchet: Okay. Something extra. Slagle: But I think also, if I can interject, the comment that the developer would be open to talking to this gentleman might even add more value. Right Matt? Sacchet: Certainly. Dick Herrboldt: Yeah, that could be hooked up into a drainage pipe in this area to flow into that would make a lot more sense than having that water run over the surface of the land. Sacchet: Yeah if you want to address that, please do. Peter Knibble: Just a quick comment. Actually we weren't aware where the storms were coming in. That's one of the reasons we're here to get this kind of input. We would prefer to put a pipe through here and pick that up as opposed to redirecting with swales... Sacchet: Makes more sense. Thank you. There was somebody else standing up I believe. Deb Lloyd: Deb Lloyd, 7302 Laredo Drive. Further comments to what Jan's remarks were. When you grant a variance you know the conditions for which you cannot, or which you can grant it. I don't believe you really meet the variance requirements here. Have you proven how many trees would be saved? Is there a calculation for that? Sacchet: Is that something staff can say something to or? Generous: Only to the extent that the grading limits are reduced through the granting of the variance. 54 9 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Deb Lloyd: I think we need to quantify how many trees would be lost. I mean this is valuable property giving up 5 feet on each lot times the width. You do the calculations. Or put in a requirement for a tree conservation type easement. Because I mean the staff report clearly states in the future they can build on the back. They could put in, I mean it's like so wide open. In the future when the homeowners are adding porches, patios, decks or additions, the extra distance from the trees may be enough room so that the trees aren't removed for the new construction? I mean they're suggesting trees might need to be removed for the new construction. It's like planning for that future inevitability. You're giving them 5 feet for that. I think you need to look long and hard at this. I was thinking about Yoberry Farms. Who, or whatever that development was. Was it farms or? Sacchet: Yoberry Farms. Deb Lloyd: Who would need that 5 feet more than those people who have no back yard? I mean we have codes for a purpose and that is to standardize the lots. There is, I haven't seen a quantification of what this is going to do for the City, and as a resident I feel compelled to bring that to your attention. Thank you. Sacchet: Thank you. Appreciate it. Anybody else wants to speak up to this item? This is your chance. Seeing nobody, I'm going to close the public hearing. Bring it back to the commission for comments and discussion. Who wants to start? Keefe: I've got a question. What's driving the variance? Is it the house size? I don't understand what's driving it. Generous: It's reduction in the grading limits. To save trees. As part of the subdivision ordinance we anticipate that they will grade, at least the 105 feet into the development. With this variance their plan is showing that they're moving that back. Keefe: Okay. And I think it goes to Uli's point which is, you know if we take this southerly road out, can we move the cul-de-sac to the right 5 feet? Saam: I guess we were just looking at that. I don't see what the north/south street has to do with the location. I mean they can move the cul-de-sac to the east right now. That doesn't affect, at least that I can see. Keefe: So could we move it 5 feet to the right and not have a variance? Generous: Well you could deny the variance and they could still comply. They just have a 30 foot front setback. They may take, their grading limits may shift a little bit but. Keefe: But in terms of the location of the cul-de-sac, there isn't sort of a driver behind that? Generous: No. If they go 5 feet farther back for their setback, the house pad gets even wider. Because they're exceeding the 90 at the 25 feet so. 55 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Lillehaug: Are we at comments right now? Sacchet: Yes. Comments and discussion. Lillehaug: Okay I'll go ahead since no one's talking. I do not support providing a variance for Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5. I'm looking at the existing, or the proposed grading limits on Sheet 4. I do not see a significant savings in trees by granting that and I guess I don't support it, but I do see where it is needed for Lot 1. Because the existing house is it looks like exactly 25 feet right off the property line. And I guess I would support a variance of 25 feet. Or a variance of 5 feet. Putting the setback at 25 feet for only Lot 1. Other than that everything looks fine to me. I do want to comment, you know I read in this report, I'm kind of miffed that there's not a single mention of what we recommended the other week's with regarding not making that connection. I mean not a word in here and it's kind of upsetting to me I guess. I mean it puts things into perspective of what our recommendations do I guess, but I certainly want to make sure that the council understands that our recommendation is to not make that connection. I understand what staff is saying here. Yes, it's a good land use policy. Yes, it's a good transportation policy to make this connection but, and it's good planning to do so. It's good on safety, etc. but if you live on Crestview, yeah you talk about doing it 10 years ago but previous to that was it planned? Was there a sign up? Can those residents actually anticipate that connection being made? Absolutely not so it's my opinion that I definitely do not support shoe horn some planning in here to do that as you're suggesting, so that's where I stood the previous weeks on making that connection and I still stand in that sense, so yes. I agree that we should not make that connection. Shift the easement over. Shift the sanitary and watermain over if we need to, and trail wise, I'm not too sure where I stand on that. It'd be good to make that connection from Pinehurst up. A little more community I guess by making that connection but I do see possibly some few residents making that trek to the school. Or do they actually even use that school. Do those residents use that school? Aanenson: Minnetonka district. Lillehaug: I don't know. I don't have a feel for how many pedestrians that would be but I think it's legitimate to make that connection a sidewalk and I would support that. Sacchet: Okay. Dan any comments? Keefe: Sure. I mean I support vacating that southerly road. I think, I don't know, I don't understand why we need the variance based on the count. I mean I understand why it's there but I don't, that I support that. The sidewalk, I'm not clear why we would have a sidewalk coming up at that point from Pinehurst. Why we wouldn't just move, try to get a sidewalk from the other cul-de-sac and Pinehurst up to the school. I do think that having an easement in there between 2 and 3 makes some sense. For future if we don't even pave it today but at least have an easement in there. Saam: Commissioner Sacchet, could I add one thing about the trail between 2 and 3 because we never said anything. 56 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Sacchet: Please. Saam: One of the reasons we recommended that it go between 2 and 1 is because of the proposed grades. We've got walkouts between 2 and 3 so you're dropping 10 feet. I mean we don't want a stairs, that sort of thing in there. We want to have it as accessible as we can, so if you go up Lot 2 as we had proposed, the grades there work better so that was the main reasoning. Sacchet: Okay. Kurt. Papke: Yeah, I don't support the variance. I think when I walked the lots yesterday, the trees in here, there's a fair number of trees but there's no 4 foot oaks or anything like that. I mean they're fairly small diameter. And just the prospect of hopefully you know not mowing them down in the future I don't think justifies the variance at this point so, that's all I have. Sacchet: Rich. Slagle: I'm a no go on the variance. I certainly think with the reputation of this builder, I mean which everybody hopefully has heard of, I trust you to do a nice job with those trees. I almost wonder, if I can throw out for consideration, if this is not premature. Only because of the upcoming council vote. I mean we get back to the thing of wondering if Pinehurst was premature because we knew this was coming on. I don't know if I'm prepared to suggest that we table it but just as an FYI. We have a proposal in front of us that shows a road connecting and we're voting yes or no, and most of us, if not all of us are saying no, we don't want the road and that's what we said earlier but yet we have a plan that has a road. So I don't know. Sacchet: Well I would take it actually a step further. I mean there are several points here that I really would like to see how it works out. I'd like to see how this looks like without the road. I'd like to see where the trail can be worked out. I'd like to see if that cul-de-sac can be pushed back a little bit and if this can be done variance free and what, how feasible that is. I mean to me adding all these things up, none of these single things would be reason to table but you add them all together, I'd like to see it. It seems reasonable to propose a variance of setback for the existing house on Lot 1. But for the other ones, it's fluffy. This thing with the trails, we don't know yet even the major road connection. With that I guess we would also get clarity where, whether that Pinehurst connection is something that council supports, which is a major variable in this. To have a trail connection makes a lot of sense between the neighborhoods to me, but we don't have all the variables around it to really make the context. Does it need a sidewalk? Well, if there is just a trail connection between the neighborhoods, it doesn't really need a sidewalk. If there's a road, it probably does. So I mean there's a lot of variables that are intertwined that actually I would go as far as thinking this should be tabled. Lillehaug: Can I further comment on it? Sacchet: Go ahead. Lillehaug: I can see your concerns Commissioner Sacchet, but I mean we approved Pinehurst based on the fact that that road's going to be, Street B is going to be cul-de-saced, so I'm very 57 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • comfortable in moving forward and making a recommendation for approval with certain conditions again that this road will not be connected and if the council chooses to connect this road, so be it. Then they will have the revisions for both sets of plans, but I mean I can foresee minor changes in this plan so there isn't a variance needed on that setback. Right-of-way width, I support the 50 foot right-of-way width. I mean I don't see a major problem with that. But other than that, I mean I think that they can work with staff and shift those lots ever so slightly and make it work. Sacchet: And I would think the reputation of the builder certainly would support that notion. certainly would give you that. Papke: Where do we actually end up with the trail? Is it, okay. It'd be nice to have it between 2 and 3, but then. Sacchet: Well that's part of the confusion. Papke: Yeah I mean you came back and said well, due to grading maybe it, you know that was why we put it between. Slagle: Point of clarification if I can on the change in topography. I mean I only look to Vasserman Ridge. The one that comes down and connects into the wetlands. I mean that's between two walkout homes and it's a little steep. You know you've got to huff and puff when you run so I mean it's doable. Saam: Yeah it's doable. It's just do we have another alternate that is better in our mind. Slagle: I'm with you. Yeah and I'm just saying I don't think it's stairs though. I guess is what I'm trying, I don't think it's stairs. Papke: It's a pretty flat lot. Keefe: It's 4 feet over 150 feet or something. Papke: Yeah, it's not much of a grade. Saam: No, these are walkouts. That's 8 or 10 feet. Sacchet: Yeah, it's 8 feet. Keefe: It's 8 feet okay. I'm looking at the wrong one. Okay. Sacchet: It goes from 56 to 64. Keefe: I'm looking at the wrong sheet. 6& 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Sacchet. Well the part that is really steep is 8. Then it flattens out. So where do we go with this guys? Somebody want to make a motion? Slagle: I'm going to make a motion. Sacchet: You make a motion. Go ahead. Slagle: I'm going to move that the Planning Commission table the preliminary plat review for this 5 lot subdivision with variances. Sacchet: Do we have a second? I can second right? Aanenson: Yes. Sacchet: I second. Lillehaug: Do you want to? Slagle moved, Sacchet seconded that the Planning Commission table Planning Case #05-02, the preliminary plat for a 5 lot subdivision with variances. Slagle and Sacchet voted in favor. Keefe, Papke and Lillehaug voted against the motion. The motion failed with a vote of2to3. Sacchet: So we have 3 to 2. So the motion was denied. Now does that mean we need to make a second motion, right? Do we have an alternate motion? Keefe: I'll make a motion that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommend approval of Planning Case #05-02 for a 5 lot subdivision with variances for a reduced right-of-way. Sacchet: Keep going. Keefe: I don't know that I want to. And reduced front yard setbacks, I don't want that. Sacchet: So you stop after reduced right-of-way of 50 feet. And you do not want the rest of it. Keefe: Right-of-way with plans prepared by Terra Engineering 11/22 based on findings of fact attached to this report and subject to the following conditions, and we need to amend some of these. Sacchet: State which, we have 1 through 24. Keefe: Numbers 1 through 24 with, but amendment to number 1. Change to between Lots 1 and 2 to Lots 2 and 3. And the same thing on the second one. And something, I don't know, something about vacating the road to the south. Slagle: I wouldn't say vacating it. Fig 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting —January 4, 2005 Keefe: How would you say that? Sacchet: Delete. Keefe: Delete the road to the south. Sacchet: However have a trail or? Keefe: You can add that if you like. I'll take amendment. And then the last would be, I think there was something about sidewalks in here too isn't there? Sacchet: Where's the sidewalk one? Keefe: Oh, it's actually in number 1. Yeah, so really we would just want to re -word number 1 to say, the developer shall include an easement for walkway or trail between Lots 2 and 3 to the school property located west of the site. Slagle: So point of clarification. You're not requesting a sidewalk. Keefe: Along the entire road, which is what I thought that was, I'm just requesting it, between 2 and 3. Sacchet: Okay? Papke: Second. Sacchet: Alright, friendly amendment. The trail connection. North/south from Street B cul-de- sac to Crestview. Keefe: That's fine. Sacchet: Because there's an easement. Okay. Thank you. Lillehaug: Point of clarification. So you added a condition deleting the roadway connection to the Pinehurst? Sacchet: Correct. Lillehaug: And then adding to that a friendly amendment? And then adding to that further, shifting the lots appropriately and working with staff to. Sacchet: Yes. And can we say, pulling the cul-de-sac back east a little bit because since we don't do the variance, we could even be specific and say pull it back 5 feet. Slagle: I'd rather leave it... 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Sacchet: Work with staff to consider pulling back the cul-de-sac easterly, considering we don't have the variance. Keefe: Right. Sacchet: Okay, is that acceptable? Keefe: Acceptable. Lillehaug: Another point of clarification. On the existing house there it's 25 feet from the proposed right-of-way, so we need to, so the roadway would need to be revised to shift that back. Am I understanding that correctly? Generous: Correct. Sacchet: From the existing house. Lillehaug: So condition necessary I guess. Just to work with staff to make it 30 feet, yep. Sacchet: Actually point of clarification. So we would not have a variance for the existing house, so the mad would have to be pulled south. Generous: That would be a 5 foot shift. Lillehaug: Which I think can easily be done, looking at it. Sacchet: Okay, and it's variance free. That's good. Alright. Keefe moved, Papke seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #05-02 for a five lot subdivision with a variance for a reduced right-of-way (50 feet), plans prepared by Terra Engineering, Inc. dated 11/22/04, based upon the findings of fact in the staff report and subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall include an easement for a sidewalk in the extension of Crestview Drive and from the end of the cul-de-sac between Lots 2 and 3 and then along the north lot line of Lot 2 to the school property located west of the site. 2. The developer shall dedicate a trail easement from Crestview Drive to the west property line between Lots 2 and 3, Block i to accommodate the pedestrian access to the Middle School site. 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 4. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. 61 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 7. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Temporary street signs shall be installed on each street intersection when construction of the new roadway allows passage by vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. 8. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. 9. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. 10. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. 11. All trees shown as preserved and outside of the grading limits as shown on plans dated 11/22/04 shall be saved. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (maximum time an area can remain unvegetated when area is not actively being worked) Steeper than 3:1 7 Days 10:1 to 3:1 14 Days Flatter than 10:1 21 Days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 62 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 13. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. 14. Construction site access points shall be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. 15. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. 16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff -Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase U Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), and Minnesota Department of Health) and comply with their conditions of approval. 17. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Submit storm sewer sizing calcs and drainage map for staff review and approval at time of final plat. 18. On the grading plan: a. Add a note to remove the existing driveway access of Lot 1. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Show a minimum 75 -foot rock construction entrance. d. Add a legend. 19. On the utility plan: a. Any connection to existing manholes or catch basins must be core drilled. b. All sanitary services must be 6"PVC-SDR26 and water services 1"copper. c. Show watermain pipe class as C-900. d. Show sanitary sewer pipe type and class. e. Show storm sewer pipe type and size (minimum 15 -in.) f. Add a hydrant on the eastern property line of Lot 1. 20. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 21. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. 22. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in 63 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 23. In conjunction with the final plat approval, the developer shall vacate the existing Crestview Drive right-of-way dedicated as part of the Shively Addition. 24. Full park fees shall be collected at the rate in force at the time of final plat." 25. Delete the road connection to the Pinehurst development but keep the trail connection to the end of Street B. 26. The applicant will work with staff to shift the cul-de-sac to the east. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. RE CITY OF CIIAN>IASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952 227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952 227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park A Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952127.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax 952.227.1404 Manning ti Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager 0 le -1. FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: May 9, 2005 SUBJ: Final Plat Approval for Crestview Planning Case No. 05-02 PROPOSAL SUMMARY The applicant is requesting final plat approval for Crestview creating five lots and right-of-way for a public street with a five-foot front yard setback variance for Lots 1 and 5. The proposal includes approximately 3.37 acres. The development complies with the Single -Family Residential (RSF) District regulations. Staff is recommending approval of the subdivision with the five-foot front yard setback variance for Lots 1 and 5. BACKGROUND On March 14, 2005, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: A five -lot subdivision (preliminary plat) with variances for a reduced right-of-way (50 feet), plans prepared by Terra Engineering, Inc., dated 11/22/04, revised 12/7/04, 2/21/05, and 2/28/05, and subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall include a sidewalk along the south side of the extension of Crestview Drive and a trail from the end of the cul-de-sac between Lots 2 and 3 to the school property located west of the site. The developer shall provide an easement for the sidewalk within Lots 3 and 4. *This condition still applies. Senior center 2. The developer shall dedicate a 20 foot trail easement and construct an 8 foot PFax:9522.27.1110 wide trail from Crestview Drive to the west property line between Lots 2 and 3, Fax: 952.227.1110 Block 1 to accommodate the pedestrian access to the Middle School site. web site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us *This condition still applies. 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. * This condition still applies. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A peat place to live, work, and play. Final Plat — Crestview • • Planning Case 05-02 May 9, 2005 Page 2 4. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. * This condition still applies. 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. * This condition still applies. 6. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. * This condition still applies. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Temporary street signs shall be installed on each street intersection when construction of the new roadway allows passage by vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. A minimum of two overstory deciduous trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. * This condition still applies. 8. A minimum of two overstory deciduous trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. * This condition still applies. 9. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. * This condition still applies. 10. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. * This condition still applies. 11. All trees shown as preserved and outside of the grading limits as shown on plans dated 11/22/04 shall be saved. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. * This condition shall be modified as follows: All trees shown as preserved and outside of the Final Plat — Crestview • • Planning Case 05-02 May 9, 2005 Page 3 grading limits as shown on plans dated 04/07/05 shall be saved. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (mardmum time an area can remain unvegetated when area is not actively being worked) Steeper than 3:1 7 Days 10:1 to 3:1 14 Days Flatter than 10:1 21 Days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. * This condition still applies. 13. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. * This condition still applies. 14. Construction site access points shall be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. * This condition still applies. 15. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. * This condition still applies. 16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff -Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase Il Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), and Minnesota Department of Health) and comply with their conditions of approval. * This condition still applies. 0 0 Final Plat — Crestview Planning Case 05-02 May 9, 2005 Page 4 17. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour stone event. Submit storm sewer sizing calcs and drainage map for staff review and approval at time of final plat. * This condition has been met. 18. On the grading plan: a. Add a note to remove the existing driveway access of Lot 1. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Add a legend. * This condition has been met. 19. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. * This condition still applies. 20. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. * This condition shall be modified as follows: The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. 21. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. * This condition still applies. 22. In conjunction with the final plat approval, the developer shall vacate the existing Crestview Drive right-of-way dedicated as part of the Shively Addition. * This condition still applies and must be done prior to recording the final plat. Final Plat — Crestview • • Planning Case 05-02 May 9, 2005 Page 5 23. Full park fees shall be collected at the rate in force at the time of final plat. * This condition shall be modified as follows: Park fees, in the amount of $16,000.00, shall be paid prior to recording the final plat. 24. The applicant will work with staff to shift the cul-de-sac to the east. * This condition no longer applies. Staff determined that the shifting of the cul-de-sac did not lead to an increase in tree preservation. The house pad would still have to be located deeper in the lot to accommodate the housing proposed. The applicant has also eliminated the front yard setback variance requests for Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 1. 25. Add the following City Detail Plates: 1002, 1004,1005, 1006, 2001, 2002, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 3101, 3102, 5200, 5203, 5214, 5215, 5300, 5301, and 5302A. * This condition has been met. The applicant will grant an extension for decision on the variance until final plat returns for approval. *This condition has been met. The variance request for the front yard setback is being held in abeyance until final plat review. In order for the City to approve the setback variance, the developer was required to show that the front yard setback variance will lead to additional tree protection as well as not having a negative impact on the street appearance, especially the crowding of the houses at the cul-de-sac. The applicant has determined that the variance for the lots on the cul-de-sac, Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, would not work and has eliminated the front yard setback variance requests for those lots. Staff has reviewed the proposed variance for Lots 1 and 5, Block 1. These variances work together to provide additional tree preservation on Lot 5, Block 1, since additional tree preservation is being provided through the variance. Therefore, staff is recommending approval of the front yard setback variance for Lots 1 and 5, Block 1, Crestview. FINAL PLAT REVIEW PROPOSAL SUMMARY The applicant is requesting final plat approval for five lots with a front yard setback variance for Lots 1 and 5 and associated right-of-way for a public street, Crestview Addition. GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL The existing site has tree cover over approximately 2+ acres of area. The plans propose to grade about 60% of the site for the new house pads and a proposed public street with a cul-de-sac. The proposed grading will prepare the site for walk -out house pads. While most of the disturbed area will be filled, the applicant is doing a nice job of matching the existing grades in the rear house- F Final Plat — Crestview Planning Case 05-02 May 9, 2005 Page 6 0 pads. Drainage swales have been proposed along the sides of the houses to maintain the neighborhood drainage pattern through the property. The existing site drainage is encompassed within one drainage area. The site drains off site to the southwesterly corner of the parcel and through the proposed Pinehurst development. Under developed conditions, the applicant is proposing to capture the street drainage, all of the front - yard drainage, and a large portion of the rearyard drainage from the lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm sewer through the Pinehurst development and to a NURP pond within the Pinehurst development. The Pinehurst pond has been sized for this site. As such, no further ponding is required. The proposed storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations have been submitted for staff review. Drainage and utility easements will be required over all off-street storm sewer and drainage swales. Proposed erosion control must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Silt fence has been shown around the grading limits of the site. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. A 75 -foot minimum rock construction entrance must be added to the entrance that will be accessed during construction. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. Based on the review of the plans, staff is recommending that the following conditions be added: 1. A temporary diversion berm shall be installed along the north edge of the property to divert run-on from the north (Murray Hill Road) to the west to keep the storm water in existing vegetated areas. 2. The applicant shall work with staff to locate CB -2 in an area that will optimize its effectiveness in intercepting runoff from the north (Murray Hill Road). 3. Silt fence shall be installed curbside following street paving and shall be maintained in place during home construction. 4. A detail for inlet control of CB -2 and CB -43A shall be provided since the proposed Wimco inlet control will only work for CB -1. The applicant shall work with staff to select the most appropriate inlet control (possibly a Wimco-type inlet control to fit the round casting or heavy duty mono -mono silt fence with 4 foot spacing of metal T -posts and a 2 foot high, 2 foot wide 1 1/2 inch clear rock berm around the silt fence). UTILITIES The plans propose on extending sewer and water from Hemlock Lane on the southeast corner of the parcel. Watermain will be stubbed east of the site in Crestview Drive for future looping 0 0 Final Plat — Crestview Planning Case 05-02 May 9, 2005 Page 7 purposes. Overall, the utility layout works well. Upon completion of the utility improvements, the utilities will be turned over to the City of Chanhassen for maintenance and ownership. According to the City's Finance Department records, the underlying property has been previously assessed and those assessments have been paid. Since the developer will be responsible for extending lateral sewer and water service to the lots, the sanitary sewer and water connection charges will be waived. However, the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will still be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications have been submitted for staff review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, Department of Health, and Watershed District. STREETS The plans propose on accessing the lots via a public street from the southeast comer of the parcel off Hemlock Lane and from the east off Crestview Drive. The original plat had a street right-of- way of 50 -feet for the extension of Crestview Drive ending with a 50 -foot right -of way radius cul-de-sac. The applicant is proposing to keep the 50 -foot wide right-of-way for Crestview and Hemlock Lane. Staff is fine with this right-of-way variance. Both streets meet required pavement width sizes of 31 -feet from back -of -curb to back -of -curb. Currently, Crestview Drive ends just east of the site with a nonstandard, 80'x 100' square cul-de- sac. With the development of this site, Crestview will be extended and the cul-de-sac location will be moved to the western end of the street. As such, the existing square turnaround area will be removed and downsized to match the proposed street width. The disturbed area will be restored with sod and the excess right-of-way will be vacated. Based on recent discussions with the Minnetonka Middle School just west of the property, the applicant has proposed a bituminous trail between Lots 2 and 3. This trail will run from the cul- de-sac to the western property line of the development. The trail will be allowed to be 8 -feet wide in accordance with prior approvals. 0 Final Plat — Crestview Planning Case 05-02 May 9, 2005 Page 8 COMPLIANCE TABLE * Requesting five-foot front yard setback variance. @ Meets or exceeds the 90 foot width at the 30 foot building setback. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motion: "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Final Plat for Crestview Addition creating five lots and associated right-of-way for public streets (plans prepared by Terra Engineering, Inc.) with a five- foot front yard setback variance for Lots 1 and 5 subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall include a sidewalk along the south side of the extension of Crestview Drive and a trail from the end of the cul-de-sac between Lots 2 and 3 to the school property located west of the site. The developer shall provide an easement for the sidewalk within Lots 3 and 4. 2. The developer shall dedicate a 20 foot trail easement and construct an 8 foot wide trail from Crestview Drive to the west property line between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 to accommodate the pedestrian access to the Middle School site. 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 4. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire Area (square feet) Frontage (feet) Depth (feet) Setback (feet) Code 15,000 90 125 Front — 30, side —10, rear — 30 Lot 1, Block 1 50,233 279 178 25 *, 10, 30 Lot 2, Block 1 18,568 63.5 @ 132 30, 10, 30 Lot 3, Block 1 22,282 57.3 @ 129 30, 10, 30 Lot 4, Block 1 15,435 106 146 30, 10, 30 Lot 5, Block 1 16,404 123 140 25 *, 10, na ROW 23,945 Total 146,867 Average Lot Size 24,590 * Requesting five-foot front yard setback variance. @ Meets or exceeds the 90 foot width at the 30 foot building setback. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motion: "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Final Plat for Crestview Addition creating five lots and associated right-of-way for public streets (plans prepared by Terra Engineering, Inc.) with a five- foot front yard setback variance for Lots 1 and 5 subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall include a sidewalk along the south side of the extension of Crestview Drive and a trail from the end of the cul-de-sac between Lots 2 and 3 to the school property located west of the site. The developer shall provide an easement for the sidewalk within Lots 3 and 4. 2. The developer shall dedicate a 20 foot trail easement and construct an 8 foot wide trail from Crestview Drive to the west property line between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 to accommodate the pedestrian access to the Middle School site. 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 4. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire 0 Final Plat — Crestview Planning Case 05-02 May 9, 2005 Page 9 0 hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 7. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Temporary street signs shall be installed on each street intersection when construction of the new roadway allows passage by vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. A minimum of two overstory deciduous trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. 8. A minimum of two overstory deciduous trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. 9. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. 10. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. 11. All trees shown as preserved and outside of the grading limits as shown on plans dated 04/07/05 shall be saved. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 13. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. Time Type of (maximum time an area can remain unvegetated Slope when area is not actively being worked) Steeper than 3:1 7 Days 10:1 to 3:1 14 Days Flatter than 10:1 21 Days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 13. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. 0 0 Final Plat — Crestview Planning Case 05-02 May 9, 2005 Page 10 14. Construction site access points shall be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. 15. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. 16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff -Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase 11 Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), and Minnesota Department of Health) and comply with their conditions of approval. 17. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 18. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. 19. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 20. In conjunction with the final plat approval, the developer shall vacate the existing Crestview Drive right-of-way dedicated as part of the Shively Addition. 21. Park fees, in the amount of $16,000.00, shall be paid prior to recording the final plat. 22. A temporary diversion berm shall be installed along the north edge of the property to divert run-on from the north (Murray Hill Road) to the west to keep the storm water in existing vegetated areas. 23. The applicant shall work with staff to locate CB -2 in an area that will optimize its effectiveness in intercepting runoff from the north (Murray Hill Road). 24. Silt fence shall be installed curbside following street paving and shall be maintained in place during home construction. 25. A detail for inlet control of CB -2 and CB -43A shall be provided since the proposed Wimco inlet control will only work for CB -1. The applicant shall work with staff to select the most 0 0 Final Plat — Crestview Planning Case 05-02 May 9, 2005 Page 11 appropriate inlet control (possibly a Wimco-type inlet control to fit the round casting or heavy duty mono -mono silt fence with 4 foot spacing of metal T -posts and a 2 foot high, 2 foot wide 1 1/2 inch clear rock berm around the silt fence)." ATTACHMENTS 1. Final plat. 2. Letter from Peter I Knaeble to Bob Generous dated April 25, 2005. 9:\plan\2004 planning casesN05-02 Cmtview\Crestview fp.dm z w N $c Zj FROM : TERRA ENGINEERING INC. • FAX N0. : 763-512-0717 • Rpr. 26 2005 12:46PM P1 TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. FROM : TERRA ENGINEERING INC. • FAX NO. : 763-512-0717 + Apr. 26 2005 12:47PM P2 CC: Roy Levy/Andy Jobnsnid, IRCy Bf03. 'Homes (fax) CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PC DATE: Jan. 4, 2005 3 CC DATE: Jan. 24, 2005 REVIEW DEADLINE: Feb. 1, 2005 CASE #: 05-02 BY: RG, LH, ML, MS, JS, ST PROPOSAL: Preliminary plat review for a five -lot subdivision with variances LOCATION: Crestview Drive west of Galpin Boulevard APPLICANT: Lecy Bros. Homes 15012 Highway 7 n Minnetonka, MN 55345 (952) 9449499 PRESENT ZONING: Single -Family Residential District, RSF 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential — Low Density (net density range 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 3.36 acres DENSITY: Gross —1.49 units per acre; Net - 1.81 units per acre SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting preliminary plat approval to create five lots with variances from the front setback and a variance from the subdivision ordinance to use a 50 -foot right-of-way. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances for variances. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 2 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting subdivision approval to subdivide one Lot and one Outlot in to five single- family lots. The existing home on the site will remain. However, the lot on which it is located is being replatted. The applicant is requesting a five-foot setback variance in conjunction with the plat to facilitate tree preservation. Additionally, they are requesting a variance to permit a 50 -foot right-of-way rather than the standard 60 -foot right-of-way. The existing Crestview Drive east of the proposed development is within a 40 -foot right-of-way. The existing right-of-way for the Crestview Drive extension will need to be vacated in conjunction with the subdivision. The properties to the north and east are zoned Single -Family Residential District, RSF, and developed with single-family homes. The property to the south is in for rezoning to RSF and subdivision approval for 43 single-family lots. The property to the west is zoned Office & Institution District, OI, and contains Minnetonka West Middle School and its athletic fields. Water and sewer service is available to the site. The property is 3.36 acres in area with and existing canopy coverage of 71 percent. The site slopes down from a high elevation of 1070 feet on the east side of the property to a low of 1052 feet in the southwest comer of the property. Approximately 9 feet of fill is proposed on the western end of the development to create the walkout lots. Staff recommended that the developer show a street connection to the property to the south, which is in for a separate development proposal. This proposed connection was originally contemplated as part of the Shively Addition subdivision in 1990. However, at that time, the right-of-way dedication was not required until the Outlot was developed. Staff is recommending approval of the subdivision with variances. We are also recommending that a sidewalk be included in the extension of Crestview Drive and from the end of the cul-de-sac to the school property located west of the site. BACKGROUND On February 22, 1990, the Chanhassen City Council approved the preliminary and final plat for Shively Addition (Subdivision #89-16) creating one Lot and one Outlot. At that time, the 50 -foot wide right-of-way for an extension of Crestview Drive was platted, but the road was not constructed. As part of the development review, the City discussed the provision of a roadway extension to the south property line, but decided to wait until future development to determine the optimum location for the roadway. In 1997, the property owner sold to the neighboring properties a portion of Lot 1 and Oudot A, Shively Addition, to the property owners to the north. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article XII, RSF Single -Family Residential District Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 3 The Minnetonka School District (ISD #276) has requested that a trail connection be provided from Crestview Drive to the Middle School West site. This trail will connect to a sidewalk that will link to the Pinehurst development located to the south and through the Woodridge Heights development along Manchester Drive to Lake Lucy Road. The City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan has several policies regarding the provision of connections between neighborhoods: Land Use Policy "Development should be planned to provide adequate internal street linkages. The land use should also seek to direct growth in a manner that makes the most efficient use of the areas highway system. Development should be planned to avoid running high traffic volumes and/or non-residential traffic through residential neighborhoods" P. 12 Transportation Policy: "As part of platting, each development should provide dedication and improvement of public streets consistent with the standards found in city ordinances. The city will promote the provision of street and pedestrian connections to maximum safety and ease of access." P. 55 "It is the city's policy to require interconnections between neighborhoods to foster a sense of community, to improve safety, and to provide convenient access for residents." P. 76 PARKS AND RECREATION Comprehensive Park Plan The proposed Crestview development is located within the municipal park service boundaries of Pheasant Hill Park and Herman Field Park. In addition, the property is directly adjacent to the Minnetonka Middle School West campus and a short drive or walk from Lake Minnewashta Regional Park. These three facilities will provide future residents significant access to park and open space resources. No additional parkland dedication is recommended as a condition of this plat. Full park fees shall be collected at the rate in force at the time of final plat. For the four additional single-family lots, a total park fee of $16,000.00 will be required based on 2005 park fees. Comprehensive Trail Plan The site does not contain or directly access any portion of the City's trail plan. A sidewalk or trail connection to the Middle School Campus should be included as a condition of approval. In addition, appropriate sidewalks connecting to the east and south should be included. Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 4 LANDSCAPING/TREE PRESERVATION Tree canopy calculations have been submitted for the Pinehurst development. They are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 3.36 ac. Baseline canopy coverage 71% or 2.39 ac. Minimum canopy coverage allowed 46% or 1.55 ac. Proposed tree preservation 35% or 1.16 ac. Developer does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed, therefore the difference between the baseline and proposed tree preservation is multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required replacement plantings. Difference in canopy coverage 16,988 SF or .39 ac. Multiplier 1.2 Total replacement 20,386 SF Total number of trees to be planted 19 trees Applicant has proposed 19 trees in their landscape plan. The applicant has requested a 5 -foot variance for the front yard setback on Lots 2 through 5. City ordinance assumes 105 feet of tree removal on a lot. Staff measured that the applicant is clearing to about a depth of 100 feet on each lot so there is five additional feet of tree preservation in the rear yards because of the reduced front yard setback. While that may not seem a significant savings now, in the future when the homeowners are adding porches, patios, decks, or additions the extra distance from the trees may be enough room so that the trees aren't removed for the new construction. This may be especially true on Lot 3. Staff supports the variance. No bufferyard plantings are required. GRADING/DRAINAGE The existing site has tree cover over approximately 2+ acres of area. The plans propose to grade about 60% of the site for the new house pads and a proposed public street with a cul-de-sac. The proposed grading will prepare the site for walk -out house pads. While most of the disturbed area will be filled, the applicant is doing a nice job of matching the existing grades in the rear housepads. Drainage swales have been proposed along the sides of the houses to maintain the neighborhood drainage pattern through the property. The existing site drainage is encompassed within one drainage area. The site drains off site to the southwesterly comer of the parcel and through the proposed Pinehurst development. Under developed conditions, the applicant is proposing to capture the street drainage, all of the front yard drainage, and a large portion of the rear yard drainage from the lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm sewer through the Pinehurst development and to a NURP pond within the Pinehurst development. The Pinehurst pond has been sized for this site. As such, no further ponding is required. The proposed storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations must be Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 5 submitted at the time of final plat application. Drainage and utility easements will be required over all off-street storm sewer and drainage swales. Proposed erosion control must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Silt fence has been shown around the grading limits of the site. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. A 75 -foot minimum rock construction entrance must be added to the entrance that will be accessed during construction. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. EROSION CONTROL AND SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT Erosion Control Erosion control blanket should be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas should have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (maamum time an area can remain unvegetated when area is not actively being worked) Steeper than 3:1 7 Days 10:1to3:1 14 Days Flatter than 10:1 21 Days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets should be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. Construction site access points should be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. Surface Water Management The storm water from this project will be conveyed through storm sewer pipes to the Pinehurst subdivision to the south. The pond on Pinehurst has been oversized to treat the storm water from the proposed project. Water Quality Fees Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this proposed development are based on single-family residential development rates of $1,093/acre. Based on Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 6 the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are estimated to be $3,672. Water Quantity Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average citywide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Single-family residential developments have a connection charge of $2,705 per developable acre. This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $9,089 for the proposed development. Because the storm water from the site will be treated off-site (within the Pinehurst subdivision), the proposed project is not eligible for surface water management credits. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. UTILITIES The plans propose on extending sewer and water from Street B on the southeast corner of the parcel. Watermain will be stubbed east of the site in Crestview Drive for future looping purposes. Overall, the utility layout looks fine. Upon completion of the utility improvements, the utilities will be turned over to the City of Chanhassen for maintenance and ownership. According to the City's Finance Department records, the underlying property has been previously assessed and those assessments have been paid. Since the developer will be responsible for extending lateral sewer and water service to the lots, the sanitary sewer and water connection charges will be waived. However, the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will still be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at the time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, Department of Health, and Watershed District. STREETS The plans propose on accessing the lots via a public street from the southeast corner of the parcel off Street B and from the east off Crestview Drive. The original plat had a street right-of-way of 50 feet for the extension of Crestview Drive. The applicant is proposing to keep the 50 -foot wide right-of-way for Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 7 Crestview but is meeting current standards for the new north/south street with a 60 -foot right-of-way. Both streets meet required pavement width sizes of 31 feet from back -of -curb to back -of -curb. Currently, Crestview Drive ends just east of the site with a nonstandard, 80'x 100' square cul-de-sac. With the development of this site, Crestview will be extended and the cul-de-sac location will be moved to the western end of the street. As such, the existing square turnaround area will be removed and downsized to match the proposed street width. The disturbed area will be restored with sod and the excess right-of-way will be vacated. Based on recent discussions with the Minnetonka Middle School just west of the property, the applicant will be required to extend a sidewalk to the western property line of the parcel between Lots 1 and 2. The plans will have to be revised to accommodate the sidewalk. The existing right-of-way for Crestview Drive must be vacated in conjunction with the final plat of Crestview Addition. OTHER AGENCIES The applicant must apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley - Purgatory -Bluff -Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase H Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering)) and comply with their conditions of approval. COMPLIANCE TABLE @ Meets 90 -foot lot width at the front setback * Requesting a front setback variance to permit 25 foot front setbacks na Not Applicable RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #05-02 for a five -lot subdivision with variances for a reduced right-of-way (50 feet) and [educed front yard setbacks (25 feet), Area (square feet) Frontage (feet) Depth (feet) Setbacks: Front, side and rear (feet) Code 15,000 90 125 30, 10, 30 Lot 1 49,100 280 180 25*, 10, 30 Lot 17,680 60 @ 131 25*,10,30 Lot 21,135 54 @ 132 25*,10,30 Lot 4 15,969 101 150 25*, 10, 30 Lot 5 1 16,486 1 119 125 1 25*, 10, na ROW 125,992 Total 1 146,362 Avera e Lot Size 124,074 @ Meets 90 -foot lot width at the front setback * Requesting a front setback variance to permit 25 foot front setbacks na Not Applicable RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #05-02 for a five -lot subdivision with variances for a reduced right-of-way (50 feet) and [educed front yard setbacks (25 feet), Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 8 plans prepared by Terra Engineering, Inc., dated 11/22/04, based on the findings of fact attached to this report and subject to the following conditions: The developer shall include a sidewalk in the extension of Crestview Drive and from the end of the cul- de-sac between Lots 1 and 2 and then along the north lot line of Lot 2 to the school property located west of the site. 2. The developer shall dedicate a trail easement from Crestview Drive to the west property line of Lot 2, Block 1 to accommodate the pedestrian access to the Middle School site. 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 4. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Temporary street signs shall be installed on each street intersection when construction of the new roadway allows passage by vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. 8. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. 9. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. 10. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. 11. All trees shown as preserved and outside of the grading limits as shown on plans dated 11/22/04 shall be saved. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 9 Type of Slope Time (maximum time an area can remain unvegetated when area is not actively being worked) Steeper than 3:1 7 Days 10:1 to 3:1 14 Days Flatter than 10:1 21 Days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 13. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. 14. Construction site access points shall be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. 15. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. 16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley - Purgatory -Bluff -Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase 11 Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), and Minnesota Department of Health) and comply with their conditions of approval. 17. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Submit storm sewer sizing calcs and drainage map for staff review and approval at time of final plat. 18. On the grading plan: a. Add a note to remove the existing driveway access of Lot 1. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Show a minimum 75 -foot rock construction entrance. d. Add a legend. 19. On the utility plan: a. Any connection to existing manholes or catch basins must be core drilled. b. All sanitary services must be 6"PVC-SDR26 and water services 1"copper. c. Show watermain pipe class as C-900. d. Show sanitary sewer pipe type and class. e. Show storm sewer pipe type and size (minimum 15 -in.) f. Add a hydrant on the eastern property line of Lot 1. Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 10 20. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 21. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. 22. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 23. In conjunction with the final plat approval, the developer shall vacate the existing Crestview Drive right-of-way dedicated as part of the Shively Addition. 24. Full park fees shall be collected at the rate in force at the time of final plat." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Development Review Application 3. Reduced Copy Existing Conditions Plan 4. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat 5. Reduced Copy Preliminary Utility Plan 6. Reduced Copy Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan/Tree Preservation Plan 7. Reduced Copy Preliminary Landscape Plan 8. Schematic Crestview/Pinehurst 9. Preliminary Plat Shively Addition Exhibit B 10. Preliminary Plat Shively Addition Exhibit A Potential Street Connection 11. Memo from Tom Berg to Todd Gerhardt 12. Park Service Area 13. Trail Map 14. Public Hearing Affidavit, Notice and Mailing List gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-02 crmtview\staff report crestview prclimAoc • 65 -oz. 02 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Myl OF FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner CgA NSEN DATE: March 14, 2005 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 SUBJ: Crestview Addition — Planning Case #05-02 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.1116 Building Inspections The applicant is requesting subdivision approval to subdivide one lot and one outlot Phone: 952.227 1180 into five single-family lots with variances for reduced street right-of-way width of Fax 952227.1190 50 feet and 25 -foot front yard setbacks. The applicant has further revised the plan to Engineering show a 50 -foot right-of-way for Hemlock Lane, added a 5 -foot wide bituminous trail Phone: 952.227.1160 between Lots 2 and 3, shifted the lot lines for Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5 to provide additional Fax: 952.227.1170 width to Lots 2 and 3 to accommodate a trail to the school site and corrected the Finance utility plan. Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 ACTION REQUIRED Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952 227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 4, 2005 to review the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to approve the Planning 8 Natural Resources proposed project including the street right-of-wayvariance with modifications to Phone: 952.227.1130 conditions I and 2 to locate the trail between Lots 2 and 3 and the addition of Fax: 952.227.1110 conditions 25 and 26 below, but they denied the front setback variance request. Public Works 1591 Park Road 25. Delete the road connection to the Pinehurst development but keep the Phone: 952.227.1300 trail connection to the end of Street B. Fax: 952227.1310 Senior Center 26. The applicant will work with staff to shift the cul-de-sac to the east. Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 The Planning Commission minutes of January 4, 2005 are attached. Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Staff opposes the deletion of the connection to Street B in the property to the south and recommends that this condition (25) be deleted from the motion on pages 7 through 10 of the staff report. This road furthers the comprehensive plan goal of connecting neighborhoods to foster a sense of community, to improve safety, and to provide convenient access for residents. Staff believes that this connection is a benefit to the property owners on Crestview Drive. In order to accommodate the trail connection between Lots 2 and 3 and gain additional area for homes on these lots, the developer has revised the plans to show a The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding (rails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. BWAWAD 0 0 Crestview Planning Case No. 05-02 March 14, 2005 Page 2 50 -foot right-of-way connection to the property to the south. However, they have not included the sidewalk connection from Hemlock Lane to the trail and they show a 5 -foot bituminous trail, rather then the required 10 -foot bituminous trail. These pedestrian improvements must be provided as part of the development. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the motion as specified in the staff report dated January 4, 2005, as modified, with the deletion of condition 25. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated January 4, 2005. 2. Planning Commission Minutes of January 4, 2005. g\plan\2005 planning cases\05-02 c twew\executive sumnwy.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PC DAO: Jan. 4, 2005 CC DATE: Jan. 24, 2005 REVIEW DEADLINE: Feb. 1, 2005 CASE #: 05-02 BY: RG, LH, ML, MS, JS, ST PROPOSAL: Preliminary plat review for a five -lot subdivision with variances LOCATION: Crestview Drive west of Galpin Boulevard APPLICANT: Lecy Bros. Homes 15012 Highway 7 Minnetonka, MN 55345 (952) 944-9499 PRESENT ZONING: Single -Family Residential District, RSF 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential — Low Density (net density range 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 3.36 acres DENSITY: Gross —1.49 units per acre; Net - 1.81 units per acre SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting preliminary plat approval to create five lots with variances from the front setback and a variance from the subdivision ordinance to use a 50 -foot right-of-way. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances for variances. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. `Location Map w Crestview Subdivision (Shively Addition Replat) Planning Case No. 05-02 Subject Property 0 0 Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 2 PROPOSAUSUMMARY The applicant is requesting subdivision approval to subdivide one Lot and one Outlot in to five single- family lots. The existing home on the site will remain. However, the lot on which it is located is being replatted. The applicant is requesting a five-foot setback variance in conjunction with the plat to facilitate tree preservation. Additionally, they are requesting a variance to permit a 50 -foot right-of-way rather than the standard 60 -foot right-of-way. The existing Crestview Drive east of the proposed development is within a 40 -foot right-of-way. The existing right-of-way for the Crestview Drive extension will need to be vacated in conjunction with the subdivision. The properties to the north and east are zoned Single -Family Residential District, RSF, and developed with single-family homes. The property to the south is in for rezoning to RSF and subdivision approval for 43 single-family lots. The property to the west is zoned Office & Institution District, OI, and contains Minnetonka West Middle School and its athletic fields. Water and sewer service is available to the site. The property is 3.36 acres in area with and existing canopy coverage of 71 percent. The site slopes down from a high elevation of 1070 feet on the east side of the property to a low of 1052 feet in the southwest comer of the property. Approximately 9 feet of fill is proposed on the western end of the development to create the walkout lots. Staff recommended that the developer show a street connection to the property to the south, which is in for a separate development proposal. This proposed connection was originally contemplated as part of the Shively Addition subdivision in 1990. However, at that time, the right-of-way dedication was not required until the Outlot was developed. Staff is recommending approval of the subdivision with variances. We are also recommending that a sidewalk be included in the extension of Crestview Drive and from the end of the cul-de-sac to the school property located west of the site. BACKGROUND On February 22, 1990, the Chanhassen City Council approved the preliminary and final plat for Shively Addition (Subdivision #89-16) creating one Lot and one Outlot. At that time, the 50 -foot wide right-of-way for an extension of Crestview Drive was platted, but the road was not constructed. As part of the development review, the City discussed the provision of a roadway extension to the south property line, but decided to wait until future development to determine the optimum location for the roadway. In 1997, the property owner sold to the neighboring properties a portion of Lot 1 and Outlot A, Shively Addition, to the property owners to the north. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article 11, Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article XII, RSF Single -Family Residential District • • Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 3 STREETS/ACCESS The Minnetonka School District (ISD #276) has requested that a trail connection be provided from Crestview Drive to the Middle School West site. This trail will connect to a sidewalk that will link to the Pinehurst development located to the south and through the Woodridge Heights development along Manchester Drive to Lake Lucy Road. The City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan has several policies regarding the provision of connections between neighborhoods: Land Use Policy: "Development should be planned to provide adequate internal street linkages. The land use should also seek to direct growth in a manner that makes the most efficient use of the areas highway system. Development should be planned to avoid running high traffic volumes and/or non-residential traffic through residential neighborhoods." P. 12 Transportation Policy: "As part of platting, each development should provide dedication and improvement of public streets consistent with the standards found in city ordinances. The city will promote the provision of street and pedestrian connections to maximum safety and ease of access." P. 55 "It is the city's policy to require interconnections between neighborhoods to foster a sense of community, to improve safety, and to provide convenient access for residents." P. 76 PARKS AND RECREATION Comprehensive Park Plan The proposed Crestview development is located within the municipal park service boundaries of Pheasant Hill Park and Herman Field Park. In addition, the property is directly adjacent to the Minnetonka Middle School West campus and a short drive or walk from Lake Minnewashta Regional Park. These three facilities will provide future residents significant access to park and open space resources. No additional parkland dedication is recommended as a condition of this plat. Full park fees shall be collected at the rate in force at the time of final plat. For the four additional single-family lots, a total park fee of $16,000.00 will be required based on 2005 park fees. Comprehensive Trail Plan The site does not contain or directly access any portion of the City's trail plan. A sidewalk or trail connection to the Middle School Campus should be included as a condition of approval. In addition, appropriate sidewalks connecting to the east and south should be included. 0 0 Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 4 LANDSCAPING/TREE PRESERVATION Tree canopy calculations have been submitted for the Crestview development. They are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 3.36 ac. Baseline canopy coverage 71% or 2.39 ac. Minimum canopy coverage allowed 46% or 1.55 ac. Proposed tree preservation 35 29% or IA6 .%ac. Developer does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed, therefore the difference between the baseline and proposed tree preservation is multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required replacement plantings. Difference in canopy coverage Multiplier Total replacement Total number of trees to be planted 46,988 25,700SF or.39.59ac. 1.2 20:386 30,840 SF 4-9 28 trees Applicant has proposed 1-9 29 trees in their landscape plan. The applicant has F ested a 5 feet . e m._ the font y ffd setbaek On 1..... 2 th«......h G !`a.. ..... ..i.i.,....a: Fe quested a nee assumes 105 Feet of tfee ..e .el An ., W Staff fnee..umd that the applioant : ele...-inn to abetit a depth of 100 feet Ra e.-Roh -1 ot so thefe is five additional feet of tfee presef-vatieft in the rear yards beeause Of the FOElueed ffent yafd seth--aek. *11hile that May not seem a significant savings flow, in the tree )FA se that the tFees ffir-en't r-emove-A for the ne-A.A., eqnstfuetion. This may be :ell., e., Let z Staff ..uppe#q thhvmzssnvt According to city ordinance the city assumes ��Y��....., .,.. ��.Pt,o.� e g ty 1 ty that at least the fust 105' of a lot will be cleared for a building. If the clearing is less than that, then the applicant is going above and beyond the minimum expectations. In the case of this subdivision, the lots requesting the 5' front yard setback variance are, on average, clearing the fust 110' to 1201. This does not preserve any additional trees. No bufferyard plantings are required. GRADING/DRAINAGE The existing site has tree cover over approximately 2+ acres of area. The plans propose to grade about 60% of the site for the new house pads and a proposed public street with a cul-de-sac. The proposed grading will prepare the site for walk -out house pads. While most of the disturbed area will be filled, the applicant is doing a nice job of matching the existing grades in the rear housepads. Drainage swales have been proposed along the sides of the houses to maintain the neighborhood drainage pattern through the property. The existing site drainage is encompassed within one drainage area. The site drains off site to the southwesterly corner of the parcel and through the proposed Pinehurst development. Under developed conditions, the applicant is proposing to capture the street drainage, all of the front yard drainage, and a 0 0 Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 5 large portion of the rear yard drainage from the lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm sewer through the Pinehurst development and to a NURP pond within the Pinehurst development. The Pinehurst pond has been sized for this site. As such, no further ponding is required. The proposed storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations must be submitted at the time of final plat application. Drainage and utility easements will be required over all off-street storm sewer and drainage swales. Proposed erosion control must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Silt fence has been shown around the grading limits of the site. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. A 75 -foot minimum rock construction entrance must be added to the entrance that will be accessed during construction. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. EROSION CONTROL AND SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT Erosion Control Erosion control blanket should be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas should have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (maximmn time an area can remain unvegetated when area is not active be' worked) Steeper than 3:1 7 Days 10:1 to 3:1 14 Days Flatter than 10:1 21 Days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets should be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. Construction site access points should be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. Surface Water Management The storm water from this project will be conveyed through storm sewer pipes to the Pinehurst subdivision to the south. The pond on Pinehurst has been oversized to treat the storm water from the proposed project. Water Quality Fees 0 0 Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 6 Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this proposed development are based on single-family residential development rates of $1,093/acre. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are estimated to be $3,672. Water Quantity Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average citywide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Single-family residential developments have a connection charge of $2,705 per developable acre. This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $9,089 for the proposed development. Because the storm water from the site will be treated off-site (within the Pinehurst subdivision), the proposed project is not eligible for surface water management credits. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. UTILITIES The plans propose on extending sewer and water from Street B (Hemlock Lane) on the southeast comer of the parcel. Watermain will be stubbed east of the site in Crestview Drive for future looping purposes. Overall, the utility layout loops fie works well. Upon completion of the utility improvements, the utilities will be turned over to the City of Chanhassen for maintenance and ownership. According to the City's Finance Department records, the underlying property has been previously assessed and those assessments have been paid. Since the developer will be responsible for extending lateral sewer and water service to the lots, the sanitary sewer and water connection charges will be waived. However, the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will still be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at the time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, Department of Health, and Watershed District. STREETS 0 0 Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 7 The plans propose on accessing the lots via a public street from the southeast corner of the parcel off Street B (Hemlock Lane) and from the east off Crestview Drive. The original plat had a street right-of- way of 50 feet for the extension of Crestview Drive. The applicant is proposing to keep the 50 -foot wide right-of-way for Crestview but is meeting euffent standuds fe and the new north/south street w44 a-60 feet right of way. Staff is fine with the right-of-way variance. Both streets meet required pavement width sizes of 31 feet from back -of -curb to back -of -curb. Currently, Crestview Drive ends just east of the site with a nonstandard, 80'x 100' square cul-de-sac. With the development of this site, Crestview will be extended and the cul-de-sac location will be moved to the western end of the street. As such, the existing square turnaround area will be removed and downsized to match the proposed street width. The disturbed area will be restored with sod and the excess right-of-way will be vacated. Based on recent discussions with the Minnetonka Middle School just west of the property, the applicant has proposed a bituminous trail between lots 2 and 3. This trail will run from the cul-de-sac to the western property line of the development. This trail must be 10 -feet wide in accordance with current city standards. ill be ..ed to extend ., side-yialk to the .. este...... pe.w., line of the .. ..el between Lots 1 and 2. The plan will have to be _e ..ea te aeeoniniodate the sidewalk. The existing right-of-way for Crestview Drive must be vacated in conjunction with the final plat of Crestview Addition. OTHER AGENCIES The applicant must apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley - Purgatory -Bluff -Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase U Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering)) and comply with their conditions of approval. COMPLIANCE TABLE @ Meets 90 -foot lot width at the front setback * Requesting a front setback variance to permit 25 foot front setbacks na Not Applicable Area (square feet) Frontage (feet) Depth (feet) Setbacks: Front, side and rear (feet) Code 15,000 90 125 30, 10, 30 Lot 1 49400 50,258 279 178 25*, 10, 30 Lot 2 17,,6W 18,606 60 63.5@ 132 25*, 10, 30 Lot 3 24-,4-3322,311 54 57.3@ 132 25*, 10, 30 Lot 4 43,96915,403 404106 146 25*, 10, 30 Lot 5 1 4648616,406119122.8 125 25*, 10, na ROW 25;992 23,378 Total 146,362 Average Lot Size 24974 24,234 @ Meets 90 -foot lot width at the front setback * Requesting a front setback variance to permit 25 foot front setbacks na Not Applicable 0 0 Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 8 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Naming G@mFni City Council adopt the following motion: "The Chanhassen Planning City Council approves Planning Case #05-02 for a five -lot subdivision with variances for a reduced right-of-way (50 feet) and denial of the variance for reduced front yard setbacks (25 feet), plans prepared by Tetra Engineering, htc., dated 11/22/04, revised 1211/04, 2/21/05 and 2/28/05, based on the findings of fact attached to this report and subject to the following conditions: The developer shall include a sidewalk along the south side of in -the extension of Crestview Drive and and a trail from the end of the cul-de-sac between Lots � 2 and d 3 md then slang tko "014h W line of IAA -a to the school property located west of the site. The developer shall provide easement for the sidewalk within Lots 3 and 4. 2. The developer shall dedicate a trail easement from Crestview Drive to the west property line of Lots 2 and 3, Block I to accommodate the pedestrian access to the Middle School site. 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 4. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Temporary street signs shall be installed on each street intersection when construction of the new roadway allows passage by vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. 8. A minimum of two overstory trees, deciduous trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. 9. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. 10. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. 0 0 Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 9 11. All trees shown as preserved and outside of the grading limits as shown on plans dated 11/22/04 shall be saved. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (maximum time an area can remain unvegetated when area is not actively being worked) Steeper than 3:1 7 Days 10:1 to 3:1 14 Days Flatter than 10:1 21 Days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 13. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. 14. Construction site access points shall be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. 15. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. 16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley - Purgatory -Bluff -Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase 11 Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), and Minnesota Department of Health) and comply with their conditions of approval. 17. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Submit storm sewer sizing calcs and drainage map for staff review and approval at time of final plat. 18. On the grading plan: a. Add a note to remove the existing driveway access of Lot 1. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. d. Add a legend. 0 0 Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 10 20. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 21. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. 22. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 23. In conjunction with the final plat approval, the developer shall vacate the existing Crestview Drive right-of-way dedicated as part of the Shively Addition. 24. Full park fees shall be collected at the rate in force at the time of final plat. 25. Delete the Food eonneetion to the _Pinehumt development but keep the tFaii conneption to the end „r c�R 26. The applicant will work with staff to shift the cul-de-sac to the east. 27. Add the following City Detail Plates: 1002,1004,1005,1006, 2001, 2002, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 3101, 3102, 5200, 5203, 5214, 5215, 5300, 5301 and 5302A." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Development Review Application 3. Reduced Copy Existing Conditions Plan 4. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat 5. Reduced Copy Preliminary Utility Plan 6. Reduced Copy Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan/Tree Preservation Plan 7. Reduced Copy Preliminary Landscape Plan 8. Schematic Crestview/Pinehurst 9. Preliminary Plat Shively Addition Exhibit B 10. Preliminary Plat Shively Addition Exhibit A Potential Street Connection 11. Memo from Tom Berg to Todd Gerhardt Crestview Subdivision with Variances Planning Case No. 05-02 January 4, 2005 Page 11 12. Park Service Area 13. Trail Map 14. Public Hearing Affidavit, Notice and Mailing List g:Aplan\2005 planning cas"\05-02 crestvicrostaff report a tview prelim.doc 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION Application of Lecy Bros. Homes for Subdivision approval to create five lots with a five foot front setback variance to permit 25 foot front setbacks and a variance to the street standards to provide 50 foot right-of-way. On January 4, 2005, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly schedule meeting to consider the application of Lecy Bros. Homes for preliminary plat approval of property with variances. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential District, RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential — Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: Outlot A, Shively Addition. 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance with a setback variance to improve tree preservation; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage; f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record, but shall provide all required easements; and 0 0 g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 5. VARIANCE FINDINGS SUBDIVISION a. The hardship is not a mere inconvenience, but is used to enhance tree preservation. b. The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or typographical conditions of the land. c. The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property. The right-of-way width for the extension of Crestview Drive is consistent with the existing roadway width. d. The granting of the variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of the subdivision ordinance, the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 6. VARIANCE FINDINGS - SETBACK a. The literal enforcement of the ordinance creates a hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. The proposed setback variance enhances tree preservation. c. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but to facilitate tree preservation. d. The hardship is not self-created by the developer, but due to the fact that the applicant is attempting to preserve contiguous areas of trees at the perimeter of the development. 0 e. The variance if approved will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. 7. The planning report #05-02, dated January 4, 2005, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat with variances. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 4`h of January, 2005. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION APPLICANT: ccr tgc�;- ADDRESS: ISO). h7 Yn 1'r-1 rvc_- c, ✓ 11//> cC�, q 155 TELEPHONE (Day Time) o-1 4-"� c( OWNER: LeGY E—KOS_ T 10'6_s ADDRESS: o-1; V, 5531% TELEPHONE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Interim Use Permit Variance Z0C) oD Non -conforming Use Permit Wetland Alteration Permit Planned Unit Development' Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Notification Sign I Site Plan Review` Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost" - $50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $400 Minor SUB Subdivision` �� --� �� _ r .' TOTAL FEE Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application -OR- the City can provide this list (Carver County properties only) for an additional fee to be invoiced to the applicant. If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this box -E5 Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. `Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/z' X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. "Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED FRDM : TERRA ENGINEERING INC. 'rfW'tb "t 7G3=512=0717 - -tbv. 15 2004 03:490H 'F13 PROJECT NAME: C re s } ✓: n ✓ LOCATION: t (% v p� C r s s d✓ a/ lir LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CSy a+It � 1v TOTAL ACREAGE: 3' 3 C Ac— WETLANDS PRESENT: YES X NO PRESENT ZONING: 9S F REQUESTED ZONING: �S PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: S of %✓%Si a.` This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application - 1 will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information 1 have submitted are true and correct to the best of m owl e. �I 3D 6� VV=n fApplcant f/0 6r' Signature of Fee Owner Date si Application Received on t2 (34 Fee Paid��= Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Thursday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. G.Nptan\fo \Dcveiopm=t Review Apprimtion.DOC kA SCANNED 'qSZ 94`f -9f99 SCANNED 1 I —,, r a z w W N O l7 D O Z Q O N Z =w 5 .Q>_ 1: a 00 z u w U 0a: IL Q t Z V 2 U M y I � tl PPP•ua� l009 — WONI833NMN3 VMM3L — p AMALS3M3 �, A I —,, r a z w W N O l7 D O Z Q O N Z =w 5 .Q>_ 1: a 00 z u w U 0a: IL Q t Z V 2 U M y I � r ozzz osff ^JJJ WWW X6'h'K wawa 11 11 WWWW wwww xxxx N N 0 VLOUN IIN 'N3SS*N*D W Z AMALS3M3 �, li Ikei NV9d DIIIILIMM MLM3 a a O 0 u O J J J�Qa r ozzz osff ^JJJ WWW X6'h'K wawa 11 11 WWWW wwww xxxx N N zzKs ro+ •s�pensu� w r poo�val9 rOp9 yy,i ^?�—w 'SNI 'xJN12133N1°JN3 ViJa31 E 1 H C 2° �� x At a :9 E5 +51 ' a � l{lRed'uet9_x $_f�ff Ao inR6 s.ii diel '^"'i.;•':,d",'"" . ffff7?iI�! 2j ` I E sl s °I g i s s k m L VIOU NIH 'N3SSVHNVH3 . G A3IAls3H3 s (U = 1d'1d ANVNIM-UNd E 9 a � U M 0 3 N U O $ 81 moo~ n s' N ..; ¢xu-ncaw — 221aS�5 NN 'R1oCoaW9 tl PPrrRuay f009 — 11 'ONR133NI`JN3 ViRF31 s F 1 A �—Q A m L VIM3NND1 'N3SSVHNH3 A3[AIS3H3 a o S A(� am NVId Airnin ANVNDCl3Hd • a § _ i SE• tl'i u ,q v, Eifii?�3�d tj I ' IN i - S i � is Eil Ae Lo N w 9CIIC m05 ]l IF15]IPY 7111 `iri n s m zz asr biro i Yw w 3dv=aNY1 AV*CA tRW k a 3 f z VI '`JNIi133N1'JN3 tll1H31 - m p e r �e x x {e?3cxase. yE}E}} S tl�1 f iS i Y:effi t�e 8svx3 f 6f EEE{{?S6fA i� I ej �S Se � s 1 :• f 4 �i e Al Jbi j... r I deF.�•.]S ACA t g {j{iF iF; 9 !! =1 ]j 9 [ 1p ;I l h I I C§ pf N l�N I fpa I fig m ri I W r3 � ____I I I 1_� 3 s . �oF�•�: t;� d.,1„r..o �., .i , •.°� o-1 I 8 g ' d p.:£3=� �p L ci �e o n 1 i 1 I i wYM (M[4,) 9C'„C I m(JS 310M l=N Y)O1>MIX � I rI •�� I � 5)5I w {1 +I 1 T L R �d YTIOVLI ALM. I I II 1 ! if li i J � • � m P � 1 E3 U ` V 1 I T L R �d YTIOVLI ALM. I I II 1 ! if li i ` I I F� • � m P � 1 E3 1 I 't� YEL7� - tt f{{ iEFs � {`C45} ee lliaa3 E F T3 3, j I 5Fg Q 1 1 i z 2• G OU i r-- . zI i25a eE a FUZE o iI c 0O i � a p � lig"( S eaES € yi 1 • �L \ I, a 1i , t t 1triL a ` I I F� • � m P � 1 E3 - tt f{{ iEFs � {`C45} ee E F T3 3, j I 5Fg Q 1 1 LIA . € i Esc a p � lig"( S eaES € fi \ .. 0 0 N \ 1 \m 14%,, 't L V 1 re NJ jj o ti —lioj � 5f'B9'✓19�o5L � r OUT LO `.3r/ Ccr of sE O�.C�IVf \ Se tc. 3, T //c, a1 Z j t \ l \ Sxi ffi //ne o SE _' p % AIW _4' 4 / ter n/Sac.%on T .? 31 7-.116, i sae.3 oanf� /Tjairumenf � � f /2-22-89 TopcGeHyhy EXHIJ3IT PRELIMINARY PLAT SHIVELY ADDITION 1 hay.by candy dxt Mn n a :me and coney e. rtpn!mtauon of a w,rof file Nd. IM p ndene. of 1M.D . &.1bad bed and of the b[aYon of ifl Cuddm9.. id ;L d any, tlrc,wn, ." all vivWe owomen, d any, bom o, on tab INC. e-wir By 19 19— enol - vay of A. �rvevw Ov ma tin, o1 ��' z35-/ EXHIJ3IT PRELIMINARY PLAT SHIVELY ADDITION N LOT\ , -r I� pr / 4I i 12-22-89 TapoGegyfiy 1 M.apa nniN �M tl�i, i, a we ,ntl cdratt .epH,nunm of ,wary al Fik No. tM eoun,krrta of tM,por, bmiMJ irW anu of �M koaion of all WtlUm�, L a anr. uo,on. nw xi dxtle enuoacnmenu, a any, nom o. on ma kne. "77 YC. L Aa wnrygM math" ary of � �/llcf-'-i9 By Bao4-F,1 EXHIJBIT- A PRELIMINARY SHIVEI Y PLAT AnnITInnl 0 ria^ \o6 1 I 'o9 ,e Q r e oti CN13 1 L J o CPeAT-V I E/ \ � 1 I 50� 351 -_ O U T L 0 \ \ \ 37A ✓auras 0;.r `-SW Ccr of SES-'. of.t'W_'\ . --._ 4.•r'A90 --,—, I i , ' Sof• 3, 7.114, .Z 1i lee ajSeafioir 3 \ ` Snv Xfi line Ole- S'6-1 i 7-.//6, 213 oanl� /Tionumer¢ � Sec.. 3, T.iiL� I , 12-22-89 TapoGegyfiy 1 M.apa nniN �M tl�i, i, a we ,ntl cdratt .epH,nunm of ,wary al Fik No. tM eoun,krrta of tM,por, bmiMJ irW anu of �M koaion of all WtlUm�, L a anr. uo,on. nw xi dxtle enuoacnmenu, a any, nom o. on ma kne. "77 YC. L Aa wnrygM math" ary of � �/llcf-'-i9 By Bao4-F,1 EXHIJBIT- A PRELIMINARY SHIVEI Y PLAT AnnITInnl 0 Memo 0 To: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 From: Tom Berge, Executive Director of Finance and Operatio 6 Date: 12/14/2004 Re: Trail Access to Middle School West Site RECEIVED DEC 1 5 2004 CITY OF CHANHASSEN We are writing to request extension of a trail from the proposed Crestview Drive to the Middle School West Site. The request is submitted to facilitate student pedestrian access to the site via the trail as an alternative to bus transportation for the neighborhood. The trail will also provide adult residents access to the school site for recreational purposes during non -school hours. Your consideration of this plan modification is sincerely appreciated. 0 D PAM SEiWICE P, EE O ON N O N O U') N O V N p O0 N p N N O O{ N O O N O pOj O co O O p O Of (n1J 1 BANEBERRY WAY' j 2 CLOVER 3 CONEFLOWER CR\ 4 PRIMROSE PLACE 5 BANEBERRY WAY E ._ G rnue o nwcs rr.. . W.newashta _ TRA L, MAP Heights PaA 0 . Cr of Shorewood o Orches Lane_ .3 r a i o k.nwar ma ..w.n Bas. a da �� __ .r.berw 4igk9 ''+a u" wn3 �"'�� y z -➢ 4 G �� 6 CF r.r r ti' t,kew, o,d ' a nnewashta ;- Lake rrison Lake L cy r ,F q titi em, or 1 r p11 Lake Ann: r --------- % ,e' sham one a-- - \t g = Mmrresara landscape"oresrm I - L e; —Arboretu Boulewe y McGlynn Or P ® C,uh,rared I Gxdlar r.v M1u V:, BNd r •• Cwn\ — �• r innaerwoM ar � yEhanhassen \ dO y Ipe Arboretum � ; ; Nature m W P7nd aP a asa„, 4 �. Lukeyoo a_Cr 4,Ira, g 6 0 0 �LL pp L�.' 11ini,aMef� r. d Gv, oen a°` 7 m a Cr tO lake DM1° m $ m Llsnan g Elud ' app. Creek = Preserve ej l , • CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on December 23, 2004, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Crestview Subdivision with Variances - Planning Case No. 05-02 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. �........M_�. Subscribed and sworn to before me this,-',�W day of jLLjW,e.`. , 2004. Notary Publi AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA KIM T. MEUWISSEN f{� Not"Public- Minnesota CARVER COUNTY MY Commission Expims 1/312005 VVVVVVVVVvVVVVV SCANNED Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 4, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Request for preliminary plat review for five -lot subdivision with Proposal: variances on 3.36 acres of property zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF) - Crestview Planning File: 05-02 Applicant: Lecv Bros. Homes Property Located at the end of Crestview Drive (Shively Addition) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Bob Generous at 952-227-1131 or Comments: e-mail bcenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission, City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallmdustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersondrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Date & Time: Tuesday, January 4 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for preliminary plat review for five -lot subdivision with Proposal: variances on 3.36 acres of property zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF) - Crestview Planning File: 05-02 Applicant: Lecy Bros. Homes Property Located at the end of Crestview Drive (Shively Addition) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing Is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead 16 public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Bob Generous at 952-227-1131 or Comments: e-mail bcenerous®ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations. Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified der application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation, Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerclaondustdal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersontrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal, Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Ns map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is dol intended to be used as are. Nis map is a conpilabW of records, information and data located in various city, carry, slate and Coral offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference irposes only. The Ciy does not warrant Mat the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used prepare this map are error free, and the City does no represent that the GIS Data can be used rt navigational, tracking or any other poposa requiring eSIa, irg measurement of distance or rection o Proclaim in the depiction of geographic features. 0 errors a discrepancies are found ease contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota ferules §4116.03. Subd. 21 (2000), antl the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not a liable for any damages, and e»ressly waves all clouts, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and Yd hamless the City from any antl all dains brought by User, its employees or agents, or third sloes which mise out Of the use's access or use of data provided. his Smo, is neither a legally recorded map or a wney and is not intended to be used as one, his map is a compilation N records, infondabon and data Iccated in vadous city, county. state and :doral Otlioes and other sWRWS regarding the anSe shOVn, and is t0 be used fd, reference urposes ONy. The City does not wamant Mat the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used I prepare INS MP are error free, aM the CM does not represent that the GIS Data can be used x navigatiala, tracking or any other Whose requiring enacting measurement of distance Or iretCon a precision in Me depiction of geographic features. n Snore a clx a, Ss are found lease contact 952-2271107. The preceding disda ler is provided pursuant to Minnesota tabdes §466.03, Sued. 21 (20011). and Me user of this map acknowledges that dile City shall not e Made for any damages. and O�ssly waives all dans, and agrees to defend. indenniy, and did handeas iM City from any and all dams brought by User, its employees or agents, or third arges which MISS 00 0f the users d,Cew or use Of data provided. Public Hearing Notification Area (500+ feet) Crestview Subdivision (Shively Addition Replat) Planning Case No. 05-02 ALEXNORTHWOODS LLC C/O UPTOWN PROPERTIES PO BOX 16314 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 MARY TRIPPLER 1931 CRESTVIEW CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 TROY PAPPAS & KART A BRACKELSBERG 1961 CRESTVIEW CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 ROBERT M & LINDA M PETERSON 2040 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 PAUL S TUNGSETH 2051 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 ARNON & PATRICIA M REESE 2080 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 RICHARD & BARBARA D ATHERTON 2082 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 ERNEST F PIVEC & TIMOTHY P MCGUIRE 2161 MELODY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 GILBERT H & JILLENE KREIDBERG TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 6444 MURRAY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 0 0 LECY BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION INC WAYNE A SCHMIDT & DBA LECY BROS HOMES CARTER M HEDBERG1930 CRESTVIEW CIR HOPK INS MN 55345 HWM 7 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 OPK CHARLES C HICKS & VICKY R SHERMAN 1941 CRESTVIEW CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 TIMOTHY J & DEBRA R HAGELE 2020 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 WILLIAM C & JUDITH J ASHENBACH 2041 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 BERNARD C JR & SANDRA BENZ 2061 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 STEVEN S & LORI A ABBLETT 2081 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JOHN R & NANCY H LIBERG 2091 MELODY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 IND SCHOOL DIST 276 261 SCHOOL AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JOHN D & KATHRYN D DESMET 6454 MURRAY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 KRISTIN F PAUL 1941 WHITETAIL RIDGE CT EXCELSIOR MN 55331 BRUCE A & JEAN A MATTSON 2020 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 MICHAEL J STACHOWSKI 2050 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JOHN THOMAS FAVORITE II SUSAN LEE FAVORITE 2080 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JOHN J & JUNE A HAMSHER 2081 MELODY HILL EXCELSIOR MN 55331 CHARLES R & BEVERLY J JACKSON 2110 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 SCOTT G & LISA B CHRISTIAN 5450 TAMARACK CIR HOPKINS MN 55345 RICHARD E & KAREN HERRBOLDT 6464 MURRAY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 DOUGLAS E & MARY K JOHNSON CAROL ASLESEN CHILD JOHN J & LYNNETTE J DELUCA 6474 MURRAY HILL RD 6482 MURRAY HILL RD 6484 MURRAY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 • DANA F NICHOLSON & DEBRA A PITTMAN 6500 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 DORIS L NIKOLAI REV TRUST 6570 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 0 NANCY K MANCINO 6620 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JAMES M & DEBRA I RONNING RICHARD A & JUDITH LINDELL RICH SLAGLE 6640 GALPIN BLVD RENO R LINDELL 7411 FAWN HILL ROAD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 6433 39TH AVE N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 NEW HOPE MN 55427 0 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Sacchet: We have a motion. Is there a second? Lillehaug: Second. Sacchet: Are there any friendly amendments? Lillehaug: The amendments as I indicated in my comments. Sacchet: Okay. Is that acceptable? Papke: Acceptable. 9 Papke moved, Lillehaug seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01, Sand Companies, Inc., with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report and Commissioner Lillehaug's comments. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Sacchet: Now it is 10:00 at night. I do want to just pose the question to the commissioners. We will go beyond curfew but I think we can get through them all. Are you willing to stay beyond curfew a little bit tonight? Alright. PUBLIC HEARING: RESIDENTIAL (RSF), LOCATED AT THE END OF CRESTVIEW DRIVE, (SHIVLEY ADDITION), CRESTVIEW. APPLICANT LECY BROS HOMES, PLANNING CASE NO. 05-02. Public Present: Name Address Pam Johnson Paul & Rachelle Tungseth Andrew Johnsrud Alan Nikolai Dick Herrboldt Tim Larkin Peter Knibble 2050 Crestview Drive 2051 Crestview Drive Lecy Bros Homes 6282 Cartway Lane, Excelsior 6464 Murray Hill Road Terra Engineering Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Sacchet: Thank you Bob. Rich, questions? Slagle: I just have two. Bob, you refer to the, and if we can put the plat up of the, and then the southern connection. Yeah, there we go. So I am to assume that in hearing you the City Council 44 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 will be voting on Monday probably on this southern development. What was staff's recommendation to the City Council regarding that road? Generous: We're still recommending the connection. However we did revise the staff report to incorporate the parks commission's recommendation that that be a permanent cul-de-sac on the south side. And then the applicant has addressed that also. They would like, if that's the case, they would like to go to a private street here and continue the trail up there because they do have to extend the sewer up in this area to serve this property, and so it would follow that same easement and alignment. So that's what they're looking at. Slagle: Okay. And if I go back to the development that we saw last time, there were comments made by the citizens of Crestview about the windiness of the road. The narrowness of the road. Is it staff's opinion, now that we are talking about this development, that that poses any concerns you know with an additional 4 or 5 homes, or 6. However many they end up with? Okay. That's all. Sacchet: Questions this side. Kurt. Papke: Yeah. The existing square cul-de-sac here, we show a new curb going here. What, and a removal of the bituminous. What happens to this property here? Does this get, does the city retain ownership of this? Does this get deeded over to the adjacent homeowners? What happens to that land? Generous: It would, the City would retain ownership of it. The abutting property owner could request a vacation of that right-of-way. And then through the public hearing process council would determine whether or not they want to vacate that. And if that was the case, then they would get that land. Sacchet: Dan, Steve, any questions from staff? Keefe: I have two questions. One is in regards to the street going south. That connects to Street B in terms of buffering next to the existing house over there. Is there I didn't see a landscaping plan or anything or berming or anything along that street on the east side of that street. Is there. Generous: Well they did show some deciduous trees along that corridor but no berming. Keefe: Okay. Alright, and then one other question. There was a lot of discussion in the last meeting in the Pinehurst development about parks and I just had a question in regards to the school. Is that, and we were talking well could we just use the school equipment or whatever and utilize that as a park. I mean do we consider that as an option in our park planning? Generous: The Parks Director did give that direction. That that is a facility that's available to the public. Keefe: So it'd be considered as a park. 45 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • Generous: Yeah. But it doesn't have the play facilities but this is also within the service area of Pheasant Hills which is to the east. Keefe: Right, so presumably if the street goes through and you have the sidewalk going through here, even people from Pinehurst development could walk over and utilize the Minnetonka Middle School West. Generous: Yes. Keefe: Thank you. Sacchet: Steve, any questions? I'm a little disoriented and I don't know exactly how to pin this into a question but with dealing with the proposed Pinehurst development, Planning Commission made their recommendation that Street B become a cul-de-sac. Generous: Correct. Sacchet: And now we're looking at this one and this one has a street in it to where we recommended there wouldn't be one, and I'm not quite, how do we reconcile that? Generous: Well your recommendation, that that street connection be eliminated and that becomes part of one of the lots. Sacchet: So it becomes part of the lot so that means the lots all would shift. Generous; Conceivably, or Lot 5 would just get bigger. Because we would have at a minimum a drainage and utility easement and a trail easement over a portion of that. Sacchet: So they could save a few more trees that way right? Generous: Yes. Sacchet: Okay. Yeah, alright. Lillehaug: Would that negate the need for a variance then if that were to happen? The 5 foot front yard variance I guess is... Generous: No, because that's based on the extension of Crestview. Lillehaug: Okay, thanks. Sacchet: Alright. With that I'd like to invite the applicant to come forward and give us your short version of this proposal. Please, if you want to state your name for the record. Peter Knibble: Mr. Chairman, members of the Planning Commission. My name is Peter Knibble with Terra Engineering. We're the civil engineers responsible for the development and Im Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • we've been working for a number of months with city staff on trying to get this site figured out. And that's the basically the project that we presented tonight is the final version of those meetings that we've come to. With me tonight is Lecy Bros Construction ... on the 4 new lots that will be developed as part of this project. Andy Johnsrud is here representing Lecy Brothers so if there's any questions in regards to the building or the ownership or those kind of questions, he's certainly able to answer those. Just a couple of comments. We've reviewed the staff report and obviously we reviewed the project. I've got a colored up board we can show you. It's basically the same information that Bob's presented. The couple issues we're concerned with, and again we were not at the last Planning Commission meeting when Pinehurst was up for approval and we would certainly concur with the Planning Commission's recommendation not to extend that street to the south, and obviously we would just either shift the lots or make that Lot 5 bigger. We support that recommendation wholeheartedly. When we started out we were directed as part of the staff review to provide that connection and we made that accommodation of our plan but again we would certainly support your recommendation not to make that and we understand the neighbors also concur with that. The second item is the connection of the trail to the school to the west and that just came up in the staff report recently as part of our review. It wasn't part of our conversations early on. I think it was just based on a meeting that the staff had with the school. One of the issues we have, I guess the main issue we have is that we see that as a large collector for the 43 homes that were, or we assume are going to be approved by the Pinehurst development. We think it'd be more appropriate to have that trail connection come out of Pinehurst directly onto the middle school property and they have direct access to do that. We understand there's some topography that may limit that or restrict it but our review, it's only a 6 to an 8 foot height of that berm and based on the amount of grading that's going to happen as part of the Pinehurst, it's certainly not an insurmountable problem to have them provide that connection. We certainly think it's more fair and more equitable to have that connection made there as opposed to funneling that traffic through our property and over to the school. So that's the main issue, two issues that we have. Again that trail connection. We would again encourage you to make that recommendation that it be connected through Pinehurst and not through this small 5 lot development, and the second is we support your recommendation on that eliminating that street connection. And with that, either Andy or I are here to make any comments. Or answer any questions. Sacchet: Thank you. Questions from the applicant. Questions from the applicant. I do have a question. Would you still, you would still make a trail connection to the south over the easement. Peter Knibble: Absolutely, yes. Sacchet: You're not debating that part. You're just rather not have the connection to the school. Peter Knibble: Correct. Sacchet: Now I do want to clarify with staff because my understanding that the school specifically requested access in that particular location, is that accurate or? Generous: That's what, based on their review of this plan, yes. 47 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Sacchet: So they specifically asked to be the connection off. Generous: To Crestview. Sacchet: Further there to the north. Not on that south side. Generous: Correct. We sent them both plats. Slagle: So you, if I may Mr. Chair. Sacchet: Go ahead. Slagle: So you sent them the plat that showed the connection from Pinehurst at the end of that cul-de-sac? Generous: Not with a connection, but with the plat adjacent to the property with all the development potential. Slagle: I'm only asking. Generous: They didn't have a connection shown on this one either. Slagle: Sure, I'm with you. I'm with you. Generous: Their comment back to us is they'd like to see the connection there. Slagle: I'm only saying that if you were the school and you saw a plat that had two cul-de-sacs with you know no connection and a road running north to this road, Crestview, you would just naturally say well that's where the trail should go since you have a road going up there, but if you said to them, there's no road going up there. Where would you want the trail connection from those 50 some odd homes to the south? I think they might say it should go off the cul-de- sac to the south. I don't know. Sacchet: That actually poses a question for you, and I'll ask the applicant. Would you be opposed, from your end, to make a connection to the school if there is a direct connection also from the Pinehurst, or are you generally opposed to a connection in every case? Andy Johnsrud: We'd love to see, if the road was to go away, we'd be certainly willing to put a connection from Lots 2 and 3. It's a straight shot right here right to the school. Sacchet: Straight across. Not necessarily up to the north Andy Johnsrud: ...that makes the most sense. Sacchet: It's the shortest, yeah. ER Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 Andy Johnsrud: Than shooting all the way up here and across. Because if there is a connection with the road and a trail this way ... parents are going to drive up here and drop their kids off. We know it's going to happen so, we'd love to just see no access there and a trail here along Crestview. That could be... Sacchet: Yeah, the Planning Commission made a very strong recommendation based on the neighbor's input. This was definitely more the neighbors driving that. And so at this point to be consistent with the consideration that the Planning Commission did in the recommendation, I'm assuming it's going to be cul-de-saced. Andy Johnsrud: Correct Absolutely.... Slagle: One last point of clarification. We're there also assuming, if I hear you right, that you would do a trail to the school for Crestview, quote unquote, and those who walk up the sidewalk or the trail and then we would have potentially Pinehurst for their, okay. Peter Knibble: That's what we would prefer. Slagle: Okay. Andy Johnsrud: Right, and even to have a sidewalk along this property, we don't think is necessary you know for these 4 homes or 5 homes. You know the trail access here would be plenty fine for that. I don't think that a 4 or 5 foot sidewalk along here is really necessary by any means. Sacchet: Alright. Appreciate your input. This is a public hearing so I'd like to invite anybody who wants to address this item to come forward at this time. State your name and address for the record and let us know what you have to say. Thank you. Dick Herrboldt: Good evening council. My name's Dick Herrboldt and I live at 6464 Murray Hill Road, which is, if you can. Yeah, I'm right, my property is right here. Sacchet: Just north of it. Dick Herrboldt: So I'm adjacent, just adjacent to this development and I'm totally opposed to the proposal for the sidewalk running through here and up this property line. That's going to go right next to my property and there's a tremendous amount of trees in there that are going to wind up getting cut down in order to access a sidewalk, which is in my opinion not needed. I'm opposed to the road, the attachment to the south development primarily because I don't think that the road is wide enough to accommodate the kind of traffic that's going to be going through there. If the sidewalk does go in, that's going to become a point where the builder just stated the people in the development south are going to be dropping their children off to access the school, which is going to cause a major traffic problem in that area. So I am opposed to both the sidewalk and the access. It makes a lot more sense to put the access through here. In my property there is an access to the school currently. One of my neighbors several years ago Cid Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • bought a large parcel of property, an access to deed to the city by the water tower for access to the school. That's about a 12-14 foot wide path. I don't know if you're familiar with that. Sacchet: Yes we are. Dick Herrboldt: So if you're going to put an access on the bottom of my property line, it's going to be about 25 feet from an access that's already there, so that doesn't make a lot of sense. Thank you. Sacchet: Appreciate your comments. Anybody else wants to address this item? This is your chance. Seeing somebody, alright. Tim Larkin: Mr. Commissioner and members, I'm Tim Larkin. I live at 2150 Crestview Drive which is the existing home. The only existing home in that proposed cul-de-sac. I guess I'd like to make just a couple of points. Just of note. I received no notice on the last public hearing when the development to the south was considered. I think it's a clerical error that my property is still listed apparently in the computer as Lecy Bros so I received no notice and could make no comment on the last week's hearing. I would just like to concur that if City Council doesn't take the recommendation of the commission and puts that road back in, it will literally be at the end of my driveway. I think it's obvious to all and it's been amply stated by Lecy Brothers that that literally becomes a driveway for the school. 43 homes to the south. 4 homes here. That doesn't seem equitable at all. I believe in the staff report that I received on last week's hearing that there is in fact a recommendation from the commission that there be access from the south. Sacchet: Right, that's correct. Tim Larkin: So it seems to be, as my neighbor has stated, it seems to be redundant to put any access to the school from the east through this cul-de-sac at all, although if the commission deems that essential, I would agree with Lecy that it should go between Lots 2 and 3. I'm being affected on Lot 1 already by the cul-de-sac, which we were aware of when we purchased the property. We were not aware that there was any consideration of a trail going down the western edge of my property. In addition the sidewalk affects us the same way. There's been discussion of having the sidewalk on the north, as well as on the south. Again I don't see that the sidewalk is necessary without that road to the south. Again if the commission deems that a sidewalk is essential, it would seem more equitable to put it on the south edge of that cul-de-sac where it would affect no existing homeowners than my existing property. I would just note very quickly, I believe the commission may be aware of this. You may not be able to see that. Orient this properly. The access that my neighbors have spoke up there's an existing access to the south. There would be an additional access to the south. You'll have two accesses to the south to the junior high. There are two existing to the north. I've only noted one but there are two existing to the north and there is one existing to the east. So again it seems to put an additional access to the junior high is redundant at best. There's ample access already there. Slagle: If I may though. Can I ask you? Tim Larkin: Sure. 50 Planning Commission Meet — January 4, 2005 • Slagle: If you were a family member on Crestview, how would your kids, say you lived closer to Galpin. How would they get to the middle school? Tim Larkin: They'd walk over one block to I believe it's, and forgive me, I've only been there only 3 months. I believe it's Murray Hill is where the access is. They'd go over one block. Slagle: Or would they cut through? Would they have to go to Galpin and then. Tim Larkin: I'd go down Galpin where there's an existing sidewalk, or trailway along Galpin. They'd take the sidewalk over one block and up to where the existing. Slagle: So go east northwest. Tim Larkin: They would go east to Galpin. Over Galpin and then up. And there's an existing, as I said, there's an existing trailway along Galpin there. Sacchet: Alright. Anything else? Tim Larkin: I believe that's it. Thank you. Sacchet: Thank you sir. I think there was somebody else starting to get up before. Alan Nikolai: My name is Alan Nikolai, 6282 Cartway Lane, Chanhassen. Good evening everybody. I've talked with my mom. She lives at 6570 Galpin Boulevard which is just right down the hill. Comer of Crestview and Galpin. She indicated to me, she's not feeling well tonight so she asked me to speak on her behalf and her name is Doris Nikolai. She does not want to see an extension to Pinehurst to the south at all because of the additional traffic concern on Crestview. Also she supports the bigger lot sizes in this development and, but would not support an additional lot with the vacation of that road. That south road. Sacchet: I don't think that's a concern. Alan Nikolai: She wants to be careful that it does so it doesn't becomes an additional lot gets factored in there. Sacchet: Okay. Alan Nikolai: As far as, and she also does not like the idea of the walkway extension from Pinehurst up to Crestview there. Sacchet: Why? Alan Nikolai: There's some talk about maybe there's, where that road is. That have maybe a walking path there. 51 Planning Commission Me•g — January 4, 2005 Sacchet: Yes, there is definitely concern. Alan Nikolai: It's maybe not to have, not to have that have the Pinehurst have their own access to the school property. In other words, to traffic it back up to Crestview and that type of thing. She said that they should, Pinehurst, that's their development, they should have the access to... Sacchet: That what match what we just touched on. Would you also oppose a connection between the Pinehurst and Crestview, not for the school part but for just the trail? Alan Nikolai: Well that's what that trail would probably be used for though. Would be the primary access would be to the school property. Unless there's another access... Sacchet: Right, that's what we just touched on. Alan Nikolai: I didn't bring that up with her. I can't really comment on that but more common sense I guess on that. At the same time I brought it up to her because I actually used to walk to that school from my mom's house and cut through the yards there you know over 30 years ago. And what I saw here tonight, you know between I think it's Lot 1 and 2, basically you're going straight west out that cul-de-sac would be the logical access you know. It's the most logical without going to the gentleman's property up to the, further to the north, that type of thing and that would be a very logical. Sacchet: Let me just be real clear. You mean the one on the cul-de-sac going straight across or the one going north? Straight across, okay. Just want to be real clear. Alan Nikolai: Right here. That doesn't make sense. This would, you know just to have a ... but have the access available for those residents and also the residents of Crestview to access the property there. Then one other consideration, a vacation of the existing cul-de-sac right here. You know whether or not that goes over to the Paul Wolff, or that used to be Paul Wolff' s, consideration may be possibly as a totlot too. Down the road. Being the City does own that property, that might be a consideration just for the Crestview residents. That might have a swing set, sand box type area for the kids. That might be you know that type of thing for a consideration. Also somewhere down the road, I don't know if you can make a recommendation on it because it's not directly tied but at the same time some fore thought there I think would be wise. And that's it. Thank you. Sacchet: Thank you very much sire. Alan Nikolai: Any questions or? Sacchet: I think we're clear. Thank you for your comments. We got another person. Janet, welcome. Janet Paulsen: My name is Janet Paulsen. I live at 7305 Laredo Drive. I just have a comment to make about the 25 foot setback from the street. I know we have private streets to preserve trees. I didn't know we had public street set backs to preserve trees. I think it's a bad precedent to set. 52 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • 5 feet isn't going to save that many trees. I think the question is, they're cramming more of a home into a lot. Especially on Lots 2 and 3. Lot 3 has a 54 foot frontage. How far back is that house going to have to be? The statement says, while that may not seem a significant savings now, in the future when homeowners are adding porches, patios, decks or additions, the extra distance from the trees may be enough room so the trees aren't removed. That's a question in the future for the homeowners to face. I don't think we should change our standards for something like that. And therefore I don't think it meets the variance conditions. That can be applied anywhere in Chanhassen and that is a really bad precedence to set. Thank you. Sacchet: Question for staff based on this comment. Does that variance enable an additional lot? Because that seems to be the implication somewhat here. Generous: It's not the lot. They can meet the 30 foot setback. Sacchet: And then follow-up question with, I'm assuming that south road connection goes away because that's what position we took as a commission when we dealt with Plowhurst to the south. Wouldn't that enable to pull back the cul-de-sac a little bit easterly? Just an idea. Alright. Let's keep going. Public hearing is still open. Yes we have some takers. Dick Herrboldt: I wanted to address one other subject and that is the drainage problem that we have. There is a drain on our cul-de-sac that runs into my, right next to my driveway. Sacchet: Now you're talking to the north Dick Herrboldt: I'm talking to the north. I'm talking about this property here. There is a drain in the street located about here. It empties into my property about right here. All the water from the 5 houses in the cul-de-sac up here, the water runs down into the woods and follows this line approximately and runs down into here and that's going to be a substantial amount of water in the spring or after a large rainfall. That was designed originally when our property was built, Curt Ostrom was the builder and that was the design that the watershed district gave him. But now that these houses are being developed back here, there's going to be a substantial amount of water that's going to be running into those lots. Now I talked to the builder before the meeting and he has a drain located here and my suggestion would be that somehow that pipe be lined up up here into my back yard so that water doesn't run over those existing lots. Sacchet: Matt, from your viewpoint, what's the drainage thing here? Sawn: It looks like they have it graded to go, it would go around the west side or the rear of Lots 2 and 3. The drainage that this gentleman is speaking of. Sacchet: Would be shifted to the west? Saam: That's the way that it's designed, yeah. To go around the back of the house Lillehaug: Existing or proposed? 53 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • Saam: No, on their proposed. Under existing I'm assuming it goes just, it goes right through into Pinehurst. Dick Her boldt: Yeah it runs right about this direction. Saam: Down to that ravine... Dick Herrboldt: Down the ravine and ultimately, I think there's a drain down there now but it used to go into the lake on 41. So it's going to be a major problem for those houses. Saam: I think we can deal with it with swales and that sort of thing. And in working with the development. Sacchet: So it's something that still would need to be refined at this point. Saam: Minor grading. Sacchet: Okay. Something extra. Slagle: But I think also, if I can interject, the comment that the developer would be open to talking to this gentleman might even add more value. Right Matt? Sacchet: Certainly. Dick Herrboldt: Yeah, that could be hooked up into a drainage pipe in this area to flow into that would make a lot more sense than having that water run over the surface of the land. Sacchet: Yeah if you want to address that, please do. Peter Knibble: Just a quick comment. Actually we weren't aware where the storms were coming in. That's one of the reasons we're here to get this kind of input. We would prefer to put a pipe through here and pick that up as opposed to redirecting with swales... Sacchet: Makes more sense. Thank you. There was somebody else standing up I believe. Deb Lloyd: Deb Lloyd, 7302 Laredo Drive. Further comments to what Jan's remarks were. When you grant a variance you know the conditions for which you cannot, or which you can grant it. I don't believe you really meet the variance requirements here. Have you proven how many trees would be saved? Is there a calculation for that? Sacchet: Is that something staff can say something to or? Generous: Only to the extent that the grading limits are reduced through the granting of the variance. 0. Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • Deb Lloyd: I think we need to quantify how many trees would be lost. I mean this is valuable property giving up 5 feet on each lot times the width. You do the calculations. Or put in a requirement for a tree conservation type easement. Because I mean the staff report clearly states in the future they can build on the back. They could put in, I mean it's like so wide open. In the future when the homeowners are adding porches, patios, decks or additions, the extra distance from the trees may be enough room so that the trees aren't removed for the new construction? I mean they're suggesting trees might need to be removed for the new construction. It's like planning for that future inevitability. You're giving them 5 feet for that. I think you need to look long and hard at this. I was thinking about Yoberry Farms. Who, or whatever that development was. Was it farms or? Sacchet: Yoberry Farms. Deb Lloyd: Who would need that 5 feet more than those people who have no back yard? I mean we have codes for a purpose and that is to standardize the lots. There is, I haven't seen a quantification of what this is going to do for the City, and as a resident I feel compelled to bring that to your attention. Thank you. Sacchet: Thank you. Appreciate it. Anybody else wants to speak up to this item? This is your chance. Seeing nobody, I'm going to close the public hearing. Bring it back to the commission for comments and discussion. Who wants to start? Keefe: I've got a question. What's driving the variance? Is it the house size? I don't understand what's driving it. Generous: It's reduction in the grading limits. To save trees. As part of the subdivision ordinance we anticipate that they will grade, at least the 105 feet into the development. With this variance their plan is showing that they're moving that back. Keefe: Okay. And I think it goes to Uli's point which is, you know if we take this southerly road out, can we move the cul-de-sac to the right 5 feet? Saam: I guess we were just looking at that. I don't see what the north/south street has to do with the location. I mean they can move the cul-de-sac to the east right now. That doesn't affect, at least that I can see. Keefe: So could we move it 5 feet to the right and not have a variance? Generous: Well you could deny the variance and they could still comply. They just have a 30 foot front setback. They may take, their grading limits may shift a little bit but. Keefe: But in terms of the location of the cul-de-sac, there isn't sort of a driver behind that? Generous: No. If they go 5 feet farther back for their setback, the house pad gets even wider. Because they're exceeding the 90 at the 25 feet so. 55 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • Lillehaug: Are we at comments right now? Sacchet: Yes. Comments and discussion. Lillehaug: Okay I'll go ahead since no one's talking. I do not support providing a variance for Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5. I'm looking at the existing, or the proposed grading limits on Sheet 4. I do not see a significant savings in trees by granting that and I guess I don't support it, but I do see where it is needed for Lot 1. Because the existing house is it looks like exactly 25 feet right off the property line. And I guess I would support a variance of 25 feet. Or a variance of 5 feet. Putting the setback at 25 feet for only Lot 1. Other than that everything looks fine to me. I do want to comment, you know I read in this report, I'm kind of miffed that there's not a single mention of what we recommended the other week's with regarding not making that connection. I mean not a word in here and it's kind of upsetting to me I guess. I mean it puts things into perspective of what our recommendations do I guess, but I certainly want to make sure that the council understands that our recommendation is to not make that connection. I understand what staff is saying here. Yes, it's a good land use policy. Yes, it's a good transportation policy to make this connection but, and it's good planning to do so. It's good on safety, etc. but if you live on Crestview, yeah you talk about doing it 10 years ago but previous to that was it planned? Was there a sign up? Can those residents actually anticipate that connection being made? Absolutely not so it's my opinion that I definitely do not support shoe horn some planning in here to do that as you're suggesting, so that's where I stood the previous weeks on making that connection and I still stand in that sense, so yes. I agree that we should not make that connection. Shift the easement over. Shift the sanitary and watermain over if we need to, and trail wise, I'm not too sure where I stand on that. It'd be good to make that connection from Pinehurst up. A little more community I guess by making that connection but I do see possibly some few residents making that trek to the school. Or do they actually even use that school. Do those residents use that school? Aanenson: Minnetonka district. Lillehaug: I don't know. I don't have a feel for how many pedestrians that would be but I think it's legitimate to make that connection a sidewalk and I would support that. Sacchet: Okay. Dan any comments? Keefe: Sure. I mean I support vacating that southerly road. I think, I don't know, I don't understand why we need the variance based on the count. I mean I understand why it's there but I don't, that I support that. The sidewalk, I'm not clear why we would have a sidewalk coming up at that point from Pinehurst. Why we wouldn't just move, try to get a sidewalk from the other cul-de-sac and Pinehurst up to the school. I do think that having an easement in there between 2 and 3 makes some sense. For future if we don't even pave it today but at least have an easement in there. Saam: Commissioner Sacchet, could I add one thing about the trail between 2 and 3 because we never said anything. 01 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • Sacchet: Please. Saam: One of the reasons we recommended that it go between 2 and 1 is because of the proposed grades. We've got walkouts between 2 and 3 so you're dropping 10 feet. I mean we don't want a stairs, that sort of thing in there. We want to have it as accessible as we can, so if you go up Lot 2 as we had proposed, the grades there work better so that was the main reasoning. Sacchet: Okay. Kurt. Papke: Yeah, I don't support the variance. I think when I walked the lots yesterday, the trees in here, there's a fair number of trees but there's no 4 foot oaks or anything like that. I mean they're fairly small diameter. And just the prospect of hopefully you know not mowing them down in the future I don't think justifies the variance at this point so, that's all I have. Sacchet: Rich. Slagle: I'm a no go on the variance. I certainly think with the reputation of this builder, I mean which everybody hopefully has heard of, I trust you to do a nice job with those trees. I almost wonder, if I can throw out for consideration, if this is not premature. Only because of the upcoming council vote. I mean we get back to the thing of wondering if Pinehurst was premature because we knew this was coming on. I don't know if I'm prepared to suggest that we table it but just as an FYI. We have a proposal in front of us that shows a road connecting and we're voting yes or no, and most of us, if not all of us are saying no, we don't want the road and that's what we said earlier but yet we have a plan that has a road. So I don't know. Sacchet: Well I would take it actually a step further. I mean there are several points here that I really would like to see how it works out. I'd like to see how this looks like without the road. I'd like to see where the trail can be worked out. I'd like to see if that cul-de-sac can be pushed back a little bit and if this can be done variance free and what, how feasible that is. I mean to me adding all these things up, none of these single things would be reason to table but you add them all together, I'd like to see it. It seems reasonable to propose a variance of setback for the existing house on Lot 1. But for the other ones, it's fluffy. This thing with the trails, we don't know yet even the major road connection. With that I guess we would also get clarity where, whether that Pinehurst connection is something that council supports, which is a major variable in this. To have a trail connection makes a lot of sense between the neighborhoods to me, but we don't have all the variables around it to really make the context. Does it need a sidewalk? Well, if there is just a trail connection between the neighborhoods, it doesn't really need a sidewalk. If there's a road, it probably does. So I mean there's a lot of variables that are intertwined that actually I would go as far as thinking this should be tabled. Lillehaug: Can I further comment on it? Sacchet: Go ahead. Lillehaug: I can see your concerns Commissioner Sacchet, but I mean we approved Pinehurst based on the fact that that road's going to be, Street B is going to be cul-de-saced, so I'm very 57 Planning Commission Mee�g—January 4, 2005 • comfortable in moving forward and making a recommendation for approval with certain conditions again that this road will not be connected and if the council chooses to connect this road, so be it. Then they will have the revisions for both sets of plans, but I mean I can foresee minor changes in this plan so there isn't a variance needed on that setback. Right-of-way width, I support the 50 foot right-of-way width. I mean I don't see a major problem with that. But other than that, I mean I think that they can work with staff and shift those lots ever so slightly and make it work. Sacchet: And I would think the reputation of the builder certainly would support that notion. certainly would give you that. Papke: Where do we actually end up with the trail? Is it, okay. It'd be nice to have it between 2 and 3, but then. Sacchet: Well that's part of the confusion. Papke: Yeah I mean you came back and said well, due to grading maybe it, you know that was why we put it between. Slagle: Point of clarification if I can on the change in topography. I mean I only look to Vasserman Ridge. The one that comes down and connects into the wetlands. I mean that's between two walkout homes and it's a little steep. You know you've got to huff and puff when you run so I mean it's doable. Saam: Yeah it's doable. It's just do we have another alternate that is better in our mind. Slagle: I'm with you. Yeah and I'm just saying I don't think it's stairs though. I guess is what I'm trying, I don't think it's stairs. Papke: It's a pretty flat lot. Keefe: It's 4 feet over 150 feet or something. Papke: Yeah, it's not much of a grade. Saam: No, these are walkouts. That's 8 or 10 feet. Sacchet: Yeah, it's 8 feet. Keefe: It's 8 feet okay. I'm looking at the wrong one. Okay. Sacchet: It goes from 56 to 64. Keefe: I'm looking at the wrong sheet. 6-:3 Planning Commission Meet — January 4, 2005 • Sacchet: Well the part that is really steep is 8. Then it flattens out. So where do we go with this guys? Somebody want to make a motion? Slagle: I'm going to make a motion. Sacchet: You make a motion. Go ahead. Slagle: I'm going to move that the Planning Commission table the preliminary plat review for this 5 lot subdivision with variances. Sacchet: Do we have a second? I can second right? Aanenson: Yes. Sacchet: I second. Lillehaug: Do you want to? Slagle moved, Sacchet seconded that the Planning Commission table Planning Case #05-02, the preliminary plat for a 5 lot subdivision with variances. Slagle and Sacchet voted in favor. Keefe, Papke and Lillehaug voted against the motion. The motion failed with a vote of2to3. Sacchet: So we have 3 to 2. So the motion was denied. Now does that mean we need to make a second motion, right? Do we have an alternate motion? Keefe: I'll make a motion that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommend approval of Planning Case #05-02 for a 5 lot subdivision with variances for a reduced right-of-way. Sacchet: Keep going. Keefe: I don't know that I want to. And reduced front yard setbacks, I don't want that. Sacchet: So you stop after reduced right-of-way of 50 feet. And you do not want the rest of it. Keefe: Right-of-way with plans prepared by Terra Engineering 11/22 based on findings of fact attached to this report and subject to the following conditions, and we need to amend some of these. Sacchet: State which, we have 1 through 24. Keefe: Numbers 1 through 24 with, but amendment to number 1. Change to between Lots 1 and 2 to Lots 2 and 3. And the same thing on the second one. And something, I don't know, something about vacating the road to the south. Slagle: I wouldn't say vacating it. 59 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • Keefe: How would you say that? Sacchet: Delete. Keefe: Delete the road to the south. Sacchet: However have a trail or? Keefe: You can add that if you like. I'll take amendment. And then the last would be, I think there was something about sidewalks in here too isn't there? Sacchet: Where's the sidewalk one? Keefe: Oh, it's actually in number 1. Yeah, so really we would just want to re -word number 1 to say, the developer shall include an easement for walkway or trail between Lots 2 and 3 to the school property located west of the site. Slagle: So point of clarification. You're not requesting a sidewalk. Keefe: Along the entire road, which is what I thought that was, I'm just requesting it, between 2 and 3. Sacchet: Okay? Papke: Second. Sacchet: Alright, friendly amendment. The trail connection. North/south from Street B cul-de- sac to Crestview. Keefe: That's fine. Sacchet: Because there's an easement. Okay. Thank you. Lillehaug: Point of clarification. So you added a condition deleting the roadway connection to the Pinehurst? Sacchet: Correct. Lillehaug: And then adding to that a friendly amendment? And then adding to that further, shifting the lots appropriately and working with staff to. Sacchet: Yes. And can we say, pulling the cul-de-sac back east a little bit because since we don't do the variance, we could even be specific and say pull it back 5 feet. Slagle: I'd rather leave it... Planning Commission M — January 4, 2005 • Sacchet: Work with staff to consider pulling back the cul-de-sac easterly, considering we don't have the variance. Keefe: Right. Sacchet: Okay, is that acceptable? Keefe: Acceptable. Lillehaug: Another point of clarification. On the existing house there it's 25 feet from the proposed right-of-way, so we need to, so the roadway would need to be revised to shift that back. Am I understanding that correctly? Generous: Correct. Sacchet: From the existing house. Lillehaug: So condition necessary I guess. Just to work with staff to make it 30 feet, yep. Sacchet: Actually point of clarification. So we would not have a variance for the existing house, so the road would have to be pulled south. Generous: That would be a 5 foot shift. Lillehaug: Which I think can easily be done, looking at it. Sacchet: Okay, and it's variance free. That's good. Alright. Keefe moved, Papke seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #05-02 for a five lot subdivision with a variance for a reduced right-of-way (50 feet), plans prepared by Terra Engineering, Inc. dated 11/22/04, based upon the findings of fact in the staff report and subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall include an easement for a sidewalk in the extension of Crestview Drive and from the end of the cul-de-sac between Lots 2 and 3 and then along the north lot line of Lot 2 to the school property located west of the site. 2. The developer shall dedicate a trail easement from Crestview Drive to the west property line between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 to accommodate the pedestrian access to the Middle School site. 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 4. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. 61 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 7. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Temporary street signs shall be installed on each street intersection when construction of the new roadway allows passage by vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. 8. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. 9. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. 10. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. 11. All trees shown as preserved and outside of the grading limits as shown on plans dated 11/22/04 shall be saved. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (maximum time an area can remain unvegetated when area is not actively being worked) Steeper than 3:1 7 Days 10:1 to 3:1 14 Days Flatter than 10:1 21 Days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 62 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • 13. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. 14. Construction site access points shall be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. 15. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. 16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain pemvts from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff -Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), and Minnesota Department of Health) and comply with their conditions of approval. 17. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Submit storm sewer sizing calcs and drainage map for staff review and approval at time of final plat. 18. On the grading plan: a. Add a note to remove the existing driveway access of Lot 1. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Show a minimum 75 -foot rock construction entrance. d. Add a legend. 19. On the utility plan: a. Any connection to existing manholes or catch basins must be core drilled. b. All sanitary services must be 6"PVC-SDR26 and water services 1"copper. c. Show watermain pipe class as C-900. d. Show sanitary sewer pipe type and class. e. Show storm sewer pipe type and size (minimum 15 -in.) f. Add a hydrant on the eastern property line of Lot 1. 20. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 21. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. 22. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in 63 Planning Commission Meeting — January 4, 2005 • the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 23. In conjunction with the final plat approval, the developer shall vacate the existing Crestview Drive right-of-way dedicated as part of the Shively Addition. 24. Full park fees shall be collected at the rate in force at the time of final plat." 25. Delete the road connection to the Pinehurst development but keep the trail connection to the end of Street B. 26. The applicant will work with staff to shift the cul-de-sac to the east. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: LECY BROS HOMES Date: 04/20/2005 Time: 2:04pm Receipt Number: DW / 6064 Clerk: DANIELLE FINAL PLAT 05-02 CRESTVIEW ITEM REFERENCE AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- DEVAP FINAL PLAT 05-02 CRESTVIEW USE & VARIANCE 250.00 --------------- Total: 250.00 Check 5710 250.00 --------------- Change: 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! 015-6Z {CANWO CITY OF CHANHASSEN • 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: LECY BROS HOMES Date: 02/04/2005 Time: 3:12pm Receipt Number: DW / 5852 Clerk: DANIELLE GIS LIST ITEM REFERENCE ------------------------------------------- AMOUNT cis GIS LIST GIS LIST 105.00 Total: --------------- 105.00 Check 4215 105.00 Change: --------------- 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! 07 -oZ. {CANNED City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 affOF (952) 227-1100 mm To: Lecy Bros. Homes 15012 Highway 7 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Ship To: r Invoice SALESPERSON DATE TERMS KTM 12/23/04 upon receipt Make all checks payable to: City of Chanhassen Please write the following code on your check: Planning Case #05-02 Crestview. If you have any questions concerning this invoice, call: (952)-227-1107. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! gAplan\fon \znvoic-gis.dm SCANNED Public Hearin Notification Area (500+ feet) Crestview Subdivision (Shively Addition Replat) Planning Case No. 05-02 Subject Property ALEXNORTHWOODS LLC C/O UPTOWN PROPERTIES PO BOX 16314 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 MARY TRIPPLER 1931 CRESTVIEW CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 TROY PAPPAS & KAKI A BRACKELSBERG 1961 CRESTVIEW CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 ROBERT M & LINDA M PETERSON 2040 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 PAUL S TUNGSETH 2051 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 ARNON & PATRICIA M REESE 2080 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 RICHARD & BARBARA D ATHERTON 2082 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 ERNEST F PIVEC & TIMOTHY P MCGUIRE 2161 MELODY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 GILBERT H & JILLENE KREIDBERG TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 6444 MURRAY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 0 10 LECY BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION WAYNE A SCHMIDT & INC CARTER M HEDBERG DBA LECY BROS HOMES 1930 CRESTVIEW CIR 15012 HWY 7 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 HOPKINS MN 55345 CHARLES C HICKS & VICKY R SHERMAN 1941 CRESTVIEW CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 TIMOTHY J & DEBRA R HAGELE 2020 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 WILLIAM C & JUDITH J ASHENBACH 2041 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 BERNARD C JR & SANDRA BENZ 2061 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 STEVEN S & LORI A ABBLETT 2081 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JOHN R & NANCY H LIBERG 2091 MELODY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 IND SCHOOL DIST 276 261 SCHOOL AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JOHN D & KATHRYN D DESMET 6454 MURRAY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 KRISTIN F PAUL 1941 WHITETAIL RIDGE CT EXCELSIOR MN 55331 BRUCE A & JEAN A MATTSON 2020 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 MICHAEL J STACHOW SKI 2050 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JOHN THOMAS FAVORITE II SUSAN LEE FAVORITE 2080 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JOHN J & JUNE A HAMSHER 2081 MELODY HILL EXCELSIOR MN 55331 CHARLES R & BEVERLY J JACKSON 2110 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 SCOTT G & LISA B CHRISTIAN 5450 TAMARACK CIR HOPKINS MN 55345 RICHARD E & KAREN HERRBOLDT 6464 MURRAY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 DOUGLAS E & MARY K JOHNSON CAROL ASLESEN CHILD JOHN J & LYNNETTE J DELUCA 6474 MURRAY HILL RD 6482 MURRAY HILL RD 6484 MURRAY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 DANA F NICHOLSON & DEBRA A PITTMAN 6500 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JAMES M & DEBRA I RONNING 6640 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 0 DORIS L NIKOLAI REV TRUST 6570 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 RICHARD A & JUDITH LINDELL RENO R LINDELL 8433 39TH AVE N NEW HOPE MN 55427 • NANCY K MANCINO 6620 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-02 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, January 4, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for preliminary plat review for five -lot subdivision with variances on 3.36 acres of property zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF), located at the end of Crestview Drive (Shively Addition) — Crestview. Applicant: Lecy Bros. Homes. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, Senior Planner Email: lbgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on December 23, 2004) 0 • Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: PLANNING CASE NO. 05-02 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as hearing on Tuesday, January 4, 2005, amended. at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers 1 in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. V Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said to consider a request for preliminary Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of plat review for five -lot subdivision the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both with variances on 3.36 acres of inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition property zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF), located at the end and publication of the Notice: of CrestviewDrive(Shively Addition) - Crestview. Applicant: Lecy Bros. Homes. A plan showing the location of the abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are Laurie A. Hartmann invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal Robert Subscribed and sworn before me on Generous, Senior Planner Email: been ffl=z(?ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227- this day of , 2004 1131 OWEN M. RAOUENZ (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, December 23, IgTARYPLSM MRY4ESOTA 2004; No. 4327) M1 Camrvssion ixMrecJan.3t.2005 Notary Public RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $22.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter....... ......................... $22.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $10.85 per column inch SCANNED i Notice of Public Hearing • Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 4, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Request for preliminary plat review for five -lot subdivision with Proposal: variances on 3.36 acres of property zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF) - Crestview Planning File: 05-02 Applicant: Lecy Bros. Homes Property Located at the end of Crestview Drive (Shively Addition) Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Bob Generous at 952-227-1131 or Comments: e-mail boenerouslOci.chanhassen.mmus. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Cade Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party Is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as apart of the hearing process. The Commission will close t`e public hearing and discuss the item and make a reconmendafion to the City Council. The City Coi ncil may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciaVindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Rem through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Subject Property This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map Is a compilation of records. information and data located in venous city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes orty. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Intormstion System (GIS) Data used W prepare this map are error free, and Ne City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any Mer purpose requiring evacting measurement of distance or dire Wan or preosion in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 9522274107. The preceding disclaimer Is provided pursuant to Minnesota Saralee §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the Oty shall not be liable for any damages, and evressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnity, and Mid hamiesa the City Iron any and all claims brought by User, Its eMloyeas or agents, or third pales which arise out of the uaefs access or use of data provided. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us NIXIE SS3 1 sr ,r=`` 0 3 i 06 02/27/OS RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED UNABLE TO FORWARD WN DC: SS917014747 *0370-01208-26-47 IIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIrllitlrlllltllrrll111rl111111111111111111111 1 - ERNEST F PIVEC & ANK 2 1 TIMOTHY P MCGUIRE 2.161 MELODY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 kill till IIll ttl111„hillitlllttlIll AliltLIII 111tillltill r, L-A CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on December 23, 2004, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Crestview Subdivision with Variances — Planning Case No. 05-02 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and s-w1�orn to before me this --,'31c' day of L=9- Xs , 2004. - � 1 Notary Publi .Lo Kak& J. En el dt, Dep Clerk @EK WISSENVVVVV ssion Fxp rrs t(J1I2005 SCANNED Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 4, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for preliminary plat review for five -lot subdivision with Proposal: variances on 3.36 acres of property zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF) - Crestview Planning File: 05.02 Applicant: Lecv Bros. Homes Property Located at the and of Crestview Drive (Shively Addition) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Bob Generous at 952-227-1131 or Comments: e-mail baenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council, The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonlrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. It you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 4, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for preliminary plat review for five -lot subdivision with Proposal: variances on 3.36 acres of property zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF) - Crestview Planning File: 05-02 Applicant: LecV Bros. Homes Property Located at the end of Crestview Drive (Shively Addition) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about Questions & this project, please contact Bob Generous at 952-227-1131 or Comments: e-mail bcenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, She Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alteration Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of t application In writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commemialliintlustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. 0 Subject Property This map is neither a legally recorded nap nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, Information and data located in yanrius city, county, state and federal offices and rimer sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference e nooses only. The Cty does not wamart that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this nap are error free, and the CM does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found release contact 952-227-1107, The preceding disdaimer Is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §066.03, Sued. 21 121 and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any carriages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold hamYess the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third Parties which was out of the users access or use of dam provided. Subject Property This nap is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey end is not intended to be used as one. This me is a compilation of records, mfomffiion and dam located in various city, county, state and lederal offices and other seems, regarting the area shown. and Is to be used for reference purposes only. The Cty does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose lecturing exacting measurement of distance or direction or predsion in the depiction of geographic features. It errors or dscrepandes are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §061 Sulw 21 (21 and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all dam, and agrees to defend, iMerinity, and hold hammss the Cry from any and all daims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which ansa 00 of the users access or use o1 data provided. Public Hearing Notification Area (500+ Crestview Subdivision (Shively Addition Replat) Planning Case No. 05-02 feet) State Hw 7 a 8 = m � m Hi iCH M." HSA 4 Nry �� wa I m 5 Subject Property L, „e T.NP gH Lu Cre A m = E W o� 9 � �v Hyad s x oma rrou p J T 4 E d i� ` s � 0 ALEXNORTHWOODS LLC C/O UPTOWN PROPERTIES PO BOX 16314 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 MARY TRIPPLER 1931 CRESTVIEW CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 TROY PAPPAS & KARI A BRACKELSBERG 1961 CRESTVIEW CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 ROBERT M & LINDA M PETERSON 2040 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 PAUL S TUNGSETH 2051 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 ARNON & PATRICIA M REESE 2080 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 RICHARD & BARBARA D ATHERTON 2082 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 ERNEST F PIVEC & TIMOTHY P MCGUIRE 2161 MELODY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 GILBERT H & JILLENE KREIDBERG TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 6444 MURRAY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 LECY BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION WAYNE A SCHMIDT & INC CARTER M HEDBERG DBA LECY BROS HOMES 1930 CRESTVIEW CIR 15012 HWY 7 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 HOPKINS MN 55345 CHARLES C HICKS & VICKY R SHERMAN 1941 CRESTVIEW CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 TIMOTHY J & DEBRA R HAGELE 2020 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 WILLIAM C & JUDITH J ASHENBACH 2041 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 BERNARD C JR & SANDRA BENZ 2061 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 STEVEN S & LORI A ABBLETT 2081 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JOHN R & NANCY H LIBERG 2091 MELODY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 IND SCHOOL DIST 276 261 SCHOOL AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JOHN D & KATHRYN D DESMET 6454 MURRAY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 KRISTIN F PAUL 1941 WHITETAIL RIDGE CT EXCELSIOR MN 55331 BRUCE A & JEAN A MATTSON 2020 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 MICHAEL J STACHOW SKI 2050 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JOHN THOMAS FAVORITE II SUSAN LEE FAVORITE 2080 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JOHN J & JUNE A HAMSHER 2081 MELODY HILL EXCELSIOR MN 55331 CHARLES R & BEVERLY J JACKSON 2110 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 SCOTT G & LISA B CHRISTIAN 5450 TAMARACK CIR HOPKINS MN 55345 RICHARD E & KAREN HERRBOLDT 6464 MURRAY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 DOUGLAS E & MARY K JOHNSON CAROL ASLESEN CHILD JOHN J & LYNNETTE J DELUCA 6474 MURRAY HILL RD 6482 MURRAY HILL RD 6484 MURRAY HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 DANA F NICHOLSON & DEBRA A PITTMAN 6500 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 DORIS L NIKOLAI REV TRUST 6570 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 NANCY K MANCINO 6620 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JAMES M & DEBRA I RONNING RICHARD A & JUDITH LINDELL RICH SLAGLE 6640 GALPIN BLVD RENO R LINDELL 7411 FAWN HILL ROAD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 8433 39TH AVE N CHANHASSEN MN 55317 NEW HOPE MN 55427 Page 1 of 1 Aanenson, Kate From: Tim Larkin[tim.larkin@telecomalliance.net] v Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 4:36 PM To: City Council Cc: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Crestview project Importance: High Mayor Furlong & Council Members: I've just learned that the hearing before the City Council that I expected to attend tonight was actually held last week. I'm shocked and embarrassed that 1 didn't keep closer tabs on the calendar. I was inadvertently told an incorrect date by the developer and didn't bother to check it myself. Without this knowledge you might reasonably be wondering why such a vocal and directly affected resident didn't bother to attend the meeting. I'm just sick to my stomach. Having said that, I reviewed quickly the minutes of the meeting and am so grateful to find that Mayor Furlong, Councilman Peterson, Councilwoman Tjornhom as well as Kate Aanenson took my previously expressed views into consideration and made them a part of the record. My heartfelt thanks to each of you. It is reassuring to know that you took it upon yourselves to consider my concerns. I fully intend to review the plats and conditions with the developer and city staff. I'll reserve comment until I'm able to do so but it's possible there may be additional information forthcoming that will help you fine tune the plans further. If that is the case, I'll be sure to brief Kate thoroughly. As I've said previously, I know that each of you have a very difficult task in attempting to balance the needs of development with the property rights of the residents of Chanhassen. I'm grateful that you've worked so diligently to do so. Thank you again for your consideration, ---Tim 952.906.1212 h Tim Larkin telecomallimce reduce cost + improve control 763.551.4242 www.telmomallimee.net CONFIDENTIAUTY NOTICE The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This email is Intended to be reviewed by only the Individual or organization named above. If you are not the Intended recipient or an authorized representative of the Intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments. If any, or the Information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You 4/8/2005 p May 9, 2005 Mayor Tom Furlong City Council Members 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 Mayor Furlong & Council Members: I look forward to meeting with you this evening as you consider the final plat for the Crestview project. I appreciate the fact that you've removed the project from the consent agenda so that I may briefly address you. A great deal of effort has gone into this project on the part of City staff and the developer in order to make it work for all parties. I appreciate their efforts. They have a difficult job, as do each of you. There is only one item that we remain divided over ---the inclusion of the pedestrian walkway to the Junior High school. After meeting with City staff, their recommendation to keep the access trail is for 2 reasons: a. the comprehensive plan calls for connections to parks; b. due to the possibility that the school district will begin charging residents within 2 miles of the middle school for transportation, pedestrian access to the school is increasingly important. I certainly appreciate the City's concern for these 2 issues but would submit that the current approved access points more than accommodates these concerns. As you review the map of access points to the school, you'll see that the Crestview access would be only 50 yards from the Plowshares access and 166 yards from the existing access on Murray Hill Rd. It is my hope that you'll agree that 3 access points within 200 yards of each other is redundant and unnecessary. Clearly removing the Crestview access point wouldn't create a hardship for pedestrians, runners or bikers in the area. Simply reviewing the map of residents in the surrounding area reveals that a vast majority of residents (existing & proposed) would have their nearest access to the Junior High via Plowshares or Murray Hill. Both the physical distance and walking routes are shorter to these access points than would be the case for Crestview. Given these facts, I'm asking you to remove the pedestrian access trail from the Crestview project. Doing so will ensure that my family of 5 will be able to enjoy the private, end of the line cul de sac that we believed we were purchasing 6 months ago. My 3, 7 & 10 year olds will be able to safely ride their bikes in the cul de sac. There will be no possibility of this cul de sac becoming a drop off/pick up point for the convenience of those attending MMSW for school or summer rec activities. Indeed, without this pedestrian trail, there would be no car traffic in the cul de sac except for those who live there. This doesn't seem like too much to ask, does it? Please contact me directly if you have questions. I Respectfully yours, Tim Larkin 612.964.5280 Is it necessary to create 3 access points within 200 yards of each other? Where is the hardship created by using only 2 access points? Why demand a 3 I access point & create an unnecessary safety concern for an existing homeowner? to Murray From H i I I access White Tail Ridge Court Crestview Circle 4 of mile 0 65th Street .4 to Pinehurst to Crestview access* access* Homes 9 of mile .4 of mile 7 .8 .3 5 .9 .4 8 *estimates for portions of roads not yet constructed provided by City staff wlmllmw��A� O -W IT 91 QzDc. � k� i � l�lov�%✓� CITY OF MEMORANDUM CIlAllllflJSEN TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner 17oaPOBox14u7eu°ra FROM: Matt Saam, Asst. City Engineerpy Chanhassen, MN 55317 capture the street drainage, all of the front -yard drainage, and a large portion of Public Works April 29, 2005 AdministrationDATE: sewer through the Pinehurst development and to a NURP pond within the Phone: 952227.1100 Pinehurst development. The Pinehurst pond has been sized for this site. As such, Fax: 952.227.1110 SUBJ: Final Plat Review of Crestview Senior center Phone: 952.227.1125 Project No. 05-11 Building Inspections submitted for staff review. Drainage and utility easements will be required over Phone: 952 227.1180 all off-street storm sewer and drainage swales. Fax: 952.227.1190 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Upon review of the plans submitted by Terra Engineering, Inc. dated April 7, Engineering 2005, I offer the following comments and recommendations: Phone: 952.227.1160 grading limits of the site. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits Fax: 952.227.1170 of tree removal. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL Finance minimum rock construction entrance must be added to the entrance that will be Phone. 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.221.1110 The existing site has tree cover over approximately 2+ acres of area. The plans propose to grade about 60% of the site for the new house pads and a proposed Park & Recreation public street with a cul-de-sac. The proposed grading will prepare the site for Phone: 952.227.1120 Fat 952.227.1110 walk -out house pads. While most of the disturbed area will be filled, the Recreation Center applicant is doing a nice job of matching the existing grades in the rear house - 2310 Coulter Boulevard pads. Drainage swales have been proposed along the sides of the houses to Phone: 952.227.1400 maintain the neighborhood drainage pattern through the property. Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning 8 The existing site drainage is encompassed within one drainage area. The site Natural Resources drains off site to the southwesterly corner of the parcel and through the proposed Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Pinehurst development. Under developed conditions, the applicant is proposing to capture the street drainage, all of the front -yard drainage, and a large portion of Public Works the rearyard drainage from the lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm 1591 Park Road sewer through the Pinehurst development and to a NURP pond within the Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Pinehurst development. The Pinehurst pond has been sized for this site. As such, no further ponding is required. The proposed storm sewer must be designed for a Senior center Phone: 952.227.1125 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations have been Fax: 952.227.1110 submitted for staff review. Drainage and utility easements will be required over all off-street storm sewer and drainage swales. Web She www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Proposed erosion control must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPM. Silt fence has been shown around the grading limits of the site. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. A 75 -foot minimum rock construction entrance must be added to the entrance that will be accessed during construction. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a Channing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A g2at place to live, work, and play. Bob Generous April 29, 2005 Page 2 UTILITIES The plans propose on extending sewer and water from Hemlock Lane on the southeast corner of the parcel. Watermain will be stubbed east of the site in Crestview Drive for future looping purposes. Overall, the utility layout works well. Upon completion of the utility improvements, the utilities will be turned over to the City of Chanhassen for maintenance and ownership. According to the City's Finance Department records, the underlying property has been previously assessed and those assessments have been paid. Since the developer will be responsible for extending lateral sewer and water service to the lots, the sanitary sewer and water connection charges will be waived. However, the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will still be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications have been submitted for staff review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, Department of Health, and Watershed District. STREETS The plans propose on accessing the lots via a public street from the southeast corner of the parcel off Hemlock Lane and from the east off Crestview Drive. The original plat had a street right-of-way of 50 -feet for the extension of Crestview Drive ending with a 50 -foot right -of way radius cul-de-sac. The applicant is proposing to keep the 50 -foot wide right-of-way for Crestview and Hemlock Lane. Staff is fine with this right-of-way variance. Both streets meet required pavement width sizes of 31 -feet from back -of -curb to back -of -curb. Currently, Crestview Drive ends just east of the site with a nonstandard, 80'x 100' square cul-de-sac. With the development of this site, Crestview will be extended and the cul-de-sac location will be moved to the western end of the street. As such, the existing square turnaround area will be removed and downsized to match the proposed street width. The disturbed area will be restored with sod and the excess right-of-way will be vacated. Bob Generous April 29, 2005 Page 3 Based on recent discussions with the Minnetonka Middle School just west of the property, the applicant has proposed a bituminous trail between Lots 2 and 3. This trail will run from the cul-de-sac to the western property line of the development. The trail will be allowed to be 8 -feet wide in accordance with prior approvals. c: Paul Oehme, City Engineer/Public Works Director Mak Sweidan, Engineer g:\eng\projects\ re tview\fpr.dm "g C'V 219 East Frontage Road CARVER110 y 1946 Waconia, MN 55387 &� WA►TER 0o ��+ Phone: 952-442-5101 Onty goo Fax: 952-442-5497 WSERVATION DISTRICT httu://www.co.carver.mn.us/SWCD/SWCD main.htmt Mission Statement. To provide leadership in conservation and teach stewardship of the soil, water, and related resources through a balanced, cooperative program that protects, restores, and improves those resources. April 22, 2005 Matt Sam, PE City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Crestview Mr. Saam: The SWCD has taken the opportunity to review the Crestview Development. The plan reviewed is dated 04/07/05. Please review and consider the following comments and suggestions regarding erosion and sediment controls and the SWPPP. Erosion Control 1. Existing storm water flared end discharges water from the north (Murray Hill Road CB). This run-on may cause significant erosion problems for this project. It is recommended to install a temporary diversion berm along the north to divert the water around the exposed soils and keep the storm water in existing vegetated areas to the west. 2. The developer and / or City may want to further investigate the feasibility of managing the storm from the flared end outlet from Murray Hill in a more non-erosive manner. If feasible, it is recommended to connect the future storm water system with this existing flared end. 3. Depending upon timing of the Pinehurst development, a rock berm (3 -inch rock) may be needed at the grading limit / pavement edge of Hemlock Lane. Sediment Control 1. Proposed silt fence north of proposed 8 -foot bituminous trail and north of Crestview Drive, east of Hemlock Lane is not needed for sediment control. 2. Silt fence curbside will be needed following street paving and during home construction. 3. Detail is needed for inlet control of C132 and CB43A as the proposed Wimco inlet control will only work for CBI. A wimco-type inlet control to fit the round casting is available. Alternatively, heavy duty mono -mono silt fence with 4 -foot spacing of metal T -posts and 1 t/2 -inch clear rock berm placed around the silt fence 2 feet high and 2 feet wide should be adequate. SWPPP A review checklist for the SWPPP has been completed and is included in this review. Items not marked with an 'x' or `N/A' need to be addressed. If there are any questions or if I can be of further assistance please contact the SWCD office. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EWLOYER Sincerely, Aaron Mlynek, CPESC Urban Conservation Technician c. Lori Haak, City Water Resource Coordinator (email) Bob Generous, Senior Planner (email) '1u : _�to. ,,� rake4_j rP March 21, 2005 2Y6 ArPJ3� e. i / t E/GA - , CITY OF U�, t t CIIANIIASSEN LMr. ec Andrew Johnsrud ,ll2g 1 p y Lecy Bros. Homes 'f 7700 Market Boulevard 15012 Highway 7 PBos 147 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Re: Preliminary Plat Approval — Crestview Addition Phone a5221,110° Fax: 952.2217 .1110 g - Plannin Case #05-02 Building Inspections Dear Mr. Johnsrud: Phone: 952.227.1100 4. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. Fax: 952.227.1190 Fax: 952.227.1310 On March 14, 2005, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: Engineering must either be removed from site or chipped. Phone: 952.227,1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 A five -lot subdivision (preliminary plat), plans prepared by Terra Engineering, Fax: 952.227.1110 Inc., dated 11/22/04, revised 12/7/04, 2/21/05, and 2/28/05, and subject to the Finance following conditions: Phone: 952.227.1140 This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by Fax: 952.227.1110 1. The developer shall include a sidewalk along the south side of the extension of Part a Recreation Crestview Drive and a trail from the end of the cul-de-sac between Lots 2 and 3 Phone: 952.227.1120 to the school property located west of the site. The developer shall provide an Fax: 952.227.1110 easement for the sidewalk within Lots 3 and 4. Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 2. The developer shall dedicate a 20 foot trail easement and construct an 8 foot Fax: 952.227.1404 wide trail from Crestview Drive to the west property line between Lots 2 and 3, Planning 8 Block 1 to accommodate the pedestrian access to the Middle School site. Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Fax: 952.227.1110 Division before building permits will be issued. Public Works 1591 Park Road 4. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs Senior Center must either be removed from site or chipped. Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 6. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, Web she trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. www.cl.chanhassen.mn.us This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 7. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Temporary street signs shall be installed on each street intersection when construction of the new roadway allows passage by vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A goat place to live, work, and play. Mr. Andrew Johnsrud March 21, 2005 Crestview Addition Preliminary Plat Page 2 8. A minimum of two overstory deciduous trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. 9. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. 10. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. �7vs 11. All trees shown as preserved and outside of the grading limits as shown on plans dated UketW shall be saved. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (maximum time an area can remain unvegetated when area is not actively being worked) Steeper than 3:1 7 Days 10:1 to 3:1 14 Days Flatter than 10:1 21 Days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 13. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. 14. Construction site access points shall be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. 15. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. 16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff -Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase 11 Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), and Minnesota Department of Health) and comply with their conditions of approval. Mr. Andrew Johnsrud March 21, 2005 Crestview Addition Preliminary Plat Page 3 17. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Submit storm sewer sizing calcs and drainage map for staff review and approval at time of final plat. 18. On the grading plan: a. Add a note to remove the existing driveway access of Lot 1. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Add a legend. 19. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 20. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. 21. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 22. In conjunction with the final plat approval, the developer shall vacate the existing Crestview Drive right-of-way dedicated as part of the Shively Addition. 23. Full park fees shall be collected at the rate in force at the time of final plat." 24. The applicant will work with staff to shift the cul-de-sac to the east. 25. Add the following City Detail Plates: 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 2001, 2002, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 3101, 3102, 5200, 5203, 5214, 5215, 5300, 5301, and 5302A. 26. The applicant will grant an extension for decision on the variance until final plat returns for approval." The variance request for the front yard setback is being held in abeyance until final plat. In order for the City to approve the setback variance, you must show that the front yard setback variance will lead to additional tree protection as well as not having a negative impact on the street appearance, es cially the crowdin of the houses at the cul -de -s c. C a �� has S(tt4 a t�. �1-v pr�.s . w/ a -�y. vxvtA�ct.. s4of rr Final plat documents must be submitted to the City three weeks prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat approval. Mr. Andrew Johnsrud March 21, 2005 Crestview Addition Preliminary Plat Page 4 Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1131. Sincerely, Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure ec: Matt Saam, Assistant City Engineer Steve Torell, Building Official g:%plan%2004 planning mm%04-36 - pinehmtNappmval leaffAm March 21, 2005 Mr. Andrew Johnsrud Lecy Bros. Homes 15012 Highway 7 Minnetonka, MN 55345 — Please review for CFestVi—ew final plat approval scheduled for the City Council on May 9, 2005. Please have comments to Bob no later than April 29, 2005. Re: Preliminary Plat Approval — Crestview Addition Planning Case #05-02 Dear Mr. Johnsmd: On March 14, 2005, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: A five -lot subdivision (preliminary plat), plans prepared by Terra Engineering, Inc., dated 11/22/04, revised 12/7/04, 2/21/05, and 2/28/05, and subject to the following conditions: ji 1. 111 leill I l� The developer shall provide an easement for the sidewalk within Lots 3 and 4. 2. The developer shall dedicate a 20 foot trail easement and construct an 8 foot wide trail from Crestview Drive to the west property line between Lots 2 and 3, flly 1 Block 1 to accommodate the pedestrian access to the Middle School site. 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 4. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. 5. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 7. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Temporary street signs shall be installed on each street intersection when construction of the new roadway allows passage by vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. Mr. Andrew Johnsrud March 21, 2005 Crestview Addition Preliminary Plat Page 2 8. A minimum of two overstory deciduous trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. 9. The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. 10. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. 11. All trees shown as preserved and outside of the grading limits as shown on plans dated 11/22!04 shall be saved. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (maximum time an area can remain unvegetated when area is not active!y being worked) Steeper than 3:1 7 Days 10:1 to 3:1 14 Days atter than10:1 1 Da s These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 13. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. 14. Construction site access points shall be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. 15. Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. 16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff -Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), and Minnesota Department of Health) and comply with their conditions of approval. Mr. Andrew Johnsrud March 21, 2005 Crestview Addition Preliminary Plat Page 3 /�he storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Submit storm sewer I ` sizing calcs and drainage map for staff review and approval at time of final plat. On the grading plan: a. Add a note to remove the existing driveway access of Lot 1. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Add a legend. NRJI W. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be rill required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The �p V f C2Q.2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary l sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. AI} of � these ch ges are b on the ber of SAC- nits assigned by the Met Council.4 Va OI.Ut t+- _Z two 0M; N"a4w, n 21. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest 4CI� edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in �{ the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. UV " 22. conjunction with the final plat approval, the developer shall vacate the existing Crestview ve right-of-way dedicated as part of the Shively Addition. U lit 23. Full park fees shall be collected at the rate in force at the time of final plat." ' �he applicant will work with staff to shift the cul-de-sac to the east. Add the following City Detail Plates: 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 2001, 2002, 2101, 2109, 2110, Iv1�11 2201, 3101, 3102, 5200, 5203, 5214, 5215, 5300, 5301, and 5302A. 26. The applicant will grant an extension for decision on the variance until final plat returns for approval , The variance request for the front yard setback is being held in abeyance until final plat. In order for the City to approve the setback variance, you must show that the front yard setback variance will lead to additional tree protection as well as not having a negative impact on the street appearance, especially the crowding of the houses at the cul-de-sac. Final plat documents must be submitted to the City three weeks prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat approval. Mr. Andrew Johnsrud March 21, 2005 Crestview Addition Preliminary Plat Page 4 Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1131. Sincerely, Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure cc: Matt Saam, Assistant City Engineer Steve Torell, Building Official g:\plan\2004 planning cases\04-36 - pinehmAappnaval letterAm 0 MY OF MEMORANDUM ruAl► URVIu TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner 7700Market Boulevard ' FROM: Mak Sweidan, Engineer7� #19 - 6I -- PO Box 147 propose to grade about 60% of the site for the new house pads and a proposed public Chanhassen, MN 55317 street with a cul-de-sac. The proposed grading will prepare the site for walk -out Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 DATE: March 4, 2005 Administration nice job of matching the existing grades in the rear house -pads. Drainage swales Phone: 952.227.1100 SUBJ: Preliminary Plat Review of Crestview Fax: 952.2271110 Land Use Review File No. 0418 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 The existing site drainage is encompassed within one drainage area. The site drains Fax: 952.227.1190 Upon review of the plans submitted by Terra Engineering, Inc. dated February 28, Engineering 2005, I offer the following comments and recommendations: Phone: 952,2271160 street drainage, all of the front -yard drainage, and a large portion of the rearyard Fax: 952.227.1170 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 The existing site has tree cover over approximately 2+ acres of area. The plans Fax: 952.227.1110 propose to grade about 60% of the site for the new house pads and a proposed public street with a cul-de-sac. The proposed grading will prepare the site for walk -out Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 house pads. While most of the disturbed area will be filled, the applicant is doing a Fax:952.227.1110 nice job of matching the existing grades in the rear house -pads. Drainage swales Recreation Center have been proposed along the sides of the houses to maintain the neighborhood 2310 Coulter Boulevard drainage pattern through the property. Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 The existing site drainage is encompassed within one drainage area. The site drains Planning a off site to the southwesterly comer of the parcel and through the proposed Pinehurst Natural Resources development. Under developed conditions, the applicant is proposing to capture the Phone: 952227.1130 street drainage, all of the front -yard drainage, and a large portion of the rearyard Fax: 952.227.1110 drainage from the lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm sewer through Public Works the Pinehurst development and to a NURP pond within the Pinehurst development. 1591 Park Road The Pinehurst pond has been sized for this site. As such, no further ponding is Phone: 952.2271300 required. The proposed storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm Fax: 952.227.1310 event. Storm sewer sizing calculations must be submitted at the time of final plat Senior Carder application. Drainage and utility easements will be required over all off-street storm Phone: 952.227.1125 sewer and drainage swales. Fax: 952.227.1110 web She Proposed erosion control must be developed in accordance with the City's Best www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Silt fence has been shown around the grading limits of the site. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. A 75 -foot minimum rock construction entrance must be added to the entrance that will be accessed during construction. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Bob Generous March 4, 2005 Page 2 UTILITIES The plans propose on extending sewer and water from Street B (hemlock Lane) on the southeast comer of the parcel. Watermain will be stubbed east of the site in Crestview Drive for future looping purposes. Overall, the utility layout works well. Upon completion of the utility improvements, the utilities will be turned over to the City of Chanhassen for maintenance and ownership. According to the City's Finance Department records, the underlying property has been previously assessed and those assessments have been paid. Since the developer will be responsible for extending lateral sewer and water service to the lots, the sanitary sewer and water connection charges will be waived. However, the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will still be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at the time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, Department of Health, and Watershed District. STREETS The plans propose on accessing the lots via a public street from the southeast corner of the parcel off Street B (Hemlock Lane) and from the east off Crestview Drive. The original plat had a street right-of-way of 50 -feet for the extension of Crestview Drive ending with a 50 -foot right -of way radius cul-de-sac. The applicant is proposing to keep the 50 -foot wide right-of-way for Crestview and the new north/south street. Staff is fine with this right-of-way variance. Both streets meet required pavement width sizes of 31 -feet from back -of -curb to back -of -curb. Currently, Crestview Drive ends just east of the site with a nonstandard, 80'x 100' square cul-de-sac. With the development of this site, Crestview will be extended and the cul-de-sac location will be moved to the western end of the street. As such, the existing square turnaround area will be removed and downsized to match the proposed street width. The disturbed area will be restored with sod and the excess right-of-way will be vacated. Based on recent discussions with the Minnetonka Middle School just west of the property, the applicant has proposed a bituminous trail between Lots 2 and 3. This Bob Generous March 4, 2005 Page 3 trail will run from the cul-de-sac to the western property line of the development. The trail must be 10 -feet wide in accordance with current City standards. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, MN Department of Health, and Watershed District. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Submit storm sewer sizing calculations and drainage map for staff review and approval at time of final plat. 3. On the grading plan: a. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. b. Add a legend. 4. The bituminous trail must be 10 -feet wide in accordance with current City standards. 5 If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 6. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. 7. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 8. Add the following City detail plates: 1002, 1004, 1005, 1006, 2001, 2002, 2101, 2109, 2110, 2201, 3101, 3102, 5200, 5203, 5214, 5215, 5300, 5301 and 5302A. c: Paul Oehme, City Engineer/Public Works Director. Matt Saam, Assistant City Engineer. g:Seng\projms\c tview\ppr2.dm Administration Phone 952100 Fax: 952.2221.117.1110 MCOPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN Building Inspections MEMORANDUM Phone 952.227.1180 TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner CITYOF FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director CIIMNSEN will provide future residents significant access to park and open space resources. Fax: 952.227.1170 No additional parkland dedication is recommended as a condition of this plat. DATE: December 22, 2004 7700 Market Boulevard Fax: 952.227.1110 PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJ: Crestview — Lec Bros. Homes y Administration Phone 952100 Fax: 952.2221.117.1110 MCOPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN Building Inspections The proposed Crestview development is located within the municipal park service Phone 952.227.1180 boundaries of Pheasant Hill Park and Herman Field Park. In addition, the Fax. 952.227.1190 property is directly adjacent to the Minnetonka Middle School West campus and a Engineering short drive or walk from Lake Minnewashta Regional Park. These three facilities Phone: 952.227.1160 will provide future residents significant access to park and open space resources. Fax: 952.227.1170 No additional parkland dedication is recommended as a condition of this plat. Finance Full park fees shall be collected at the rate in force at the time of final plat. Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN Park & Recreation Phone: 952 2271120 The site does not contain or directly access any portion of the City's trail plan. A Fax 952.227.1110 sidewalk or trail connection to the Middle School Campus should be included as a Recreation Center condition of approval. In addition, appropriate sidewalks connecting to the east 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 and south should be included. Fax: 952.227.1404 ATTACHMENTS: Planning 6 Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 1. Park Service Area Map Fax:952.227.1110 2. Trail Map Public Works 1591 Park Road c: Park and Recreation Commission Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 g:\park\th\crestview drive.dm Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a chaffing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. SWW FEE WORKSHEET DATE December 21, 2004 CASE # 05-02 PROJECT Crestview Drive Subdivision WATER QUALITY WATER QUANTITY Site Area in Acres Assessable area ZONING CLASSIFICATION FEES Rate per Acre 3.36 3.36 RSF Acres Total $ 1,093.00 3.36 $ 3,672.48 Rate per Acre Acres Total $ 2,705.00 3.36 $ 9,088.80 CREDITS ITEM UNTr QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL PRICE PRICE Storm water pond acre 0 $ 1,093.00 $ Outlet structure each 0.00 $ 21500.00 $ 4TAV�l�y�ld SWMP CREDITS $ 12,761.28 TOTAL SWMP FEE $ 12,761.28 MY OF MEMORANDUM WHESEN TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner 7700 Market FROM: Mak Sweidan, Engineer POBoxB147evard capture the street drainage, all of the front -yard drainage, and a large portion of Chanhassen, MN 55317 the rearyard drainage from the lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm 1591 Park Road DATE: December 21, 2004 Administration Pinehurst development. The Pinehurst pond has been sized for this site. As such, Phone: 952.227.1100 no further ponding is required. The proposed storm sewer must be designed for a Fax: 952.227.1118 SUBJ: Preliminary Plat Review of Crestview Phone: 952.227.it25 Fax: 952.227.1110 Land Use Review File No. 04-18 Building Inspections required over all off-street storm sewer and drainage swales. Phone: 952 2271180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Proposed erosion control must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Upon review of the plans submitted by Terra Engineering, Inc. dated Engineering November 22, 2004, I offer the following comments and recommendations: Phone: 952 227.1160 of tree removal. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded Fax: 952.227.1170 and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. A 75 -foot GRADING. DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL Finance accessed during construction. If importing or exporting material for development Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 The existing site has tree cover over approximately 2+ acres of area. The plans propose to grade about 60% of the site for the new house pads and a proposed Park & Recreation public street with a cul-de-sac. The proposed grading will prepare the site for PFax:952.227.1110 Fax: 952.227.1110 walk -out house ads. While most of the disturbed area will be filled, the P RecreationCenler applicant is doing a nice job of matching the existing grades in the rear 2310 Coulter Boulevard housepads. Drainage swales have been proposed along the sides of the houses to Phone:952.227.14W maintain the neighborhood drainage pattern through the property. Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning a The existing site drainage is encompassed within one drainage area. The site Natural Resources drains off site to the southwesterly corner of the parcel and through the proposed PFax:9522.27.1110 Pinehurst development. Under developed conditions, the applicant is proposing to Fax: 952.227.1110 capture the street drainage, all of the front -yard drainage, and a large portion of Public Works the rearyard drainage from the lots. This stormwater will be conveyed via storm 1591 Park Road sewer through the Pinehurst development and to a NURP pond within the Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Pinehurst development. The Pinehurst pond has been sized for this site. As such, no further ponding is required. The proposed storm sewer must be designed for a Senior Center 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Storm sewer sizing calculations must be submitted Phone: 952.227.it25 Fax: 952.227.1110 at the time of final plat application. Drainage and utility easements will be required over all off-street storm sewer and drainage swales. Web She www.cl.chanhassen.mn.us Proposed erosion control must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Silt fence has been shown around the grading limits of the site. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. A 75 -foot minimum rock construction entrance must be added to the entrance that will be accessed during construction. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. Bob Generous December 21, 2004 Page 2 UTILITIES The plans propose on extending sewer and water from Street B on the southeast corner of the parcel. Watermain will be stubbed east of the site in Crestview Drive for future looping purposes. Overall, the utility layout looks fine. Upon completion of the utility improvements, the utilities will be turned over to the City of Chanhassen for maintenance and ownership. According to the City's Finance Department records, the underlying property has been previously assessed and those assessments have been paid. Since the developer will be responsible for extending lateral sewer and water service to the lots, the sanitary sewer and water connection charges will be waived. However, the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will still be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at the time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPGA, Department of Health, and Watershed District. STREETS The plans propose on accessing the lots via a public street from the southeast corner of the parcel off Street B and from the east off Crestview Drive. The original plat had a street right-of-way of 50 -feet for the extension of Crestview Drive. The applicant is proposing to keep the 50 -foot wide right-of-way for Crestview but is meeting current standards for the new north/south street with a 60 -foot right-of-way. Both streets meet required pavement width sizes of 31 -feet from back -of -curb to back -of -curb. Currently, Crestview Drive ends just east of the site with a nonstandard, 80' x 100' square cul-de-sac. With the development of this site, Crestview will be extended and the cul-de-sac location will be moved to the western end of the street. As such, the existing square turnaround area will be removed and downsized to match the proposed street width. The disturbed area will be restored with sod and the excess right-of-way will be vacated. Bob Generous December 21, 2004 Page 3 Based on recent discussions with the Minnetonka Middle School just west of the property, the applicant will be required to extend a sidewalk to the western property line of the parcel between Lots 1 and 2. The plans will have to be revised to accommodate the sidewalk. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, MN Department of Health, and Watershed District. 2. The storm sewer must be designed for a 10 -year, 24-hour storm event. Submit storm sewer sizing calcs and drainage map for staff review and approval at time of final plat. On the grading plan: a. Add a note to remove the existing driveway access of Lot 1. b. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c. Show a minimum 75 -foot rock construction entrance. d. Add a legend. 4. On the utility plan: a. Any connection to existing manholes or catch basins must be core drilled. b. All sanitary services must be 6"PVC-SDR26 and water services 1"copper. c. Show watermain pipe class as C-900. d. Show sanitary sewer pipe type and class. e. Show storm sewer pipe type and size (minimum 15 -in.) f. Add a hydrant on the eastern property line of Lot 1. 5 If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 6. Extend a sidewalk to the western property line of the parcel between Lots 1 and 2. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. 8. Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed Bob Generous December 21, 2004 Page 4 construction plans and specifications must be submitted at time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. c: Paul Oehme, City Engineer/Public Works Director. Matt Saam, Assistant City Engineer. gAeng\projects\crestview\ppr.doc Memo o5 -OZ RECEIVEL) DEC 15 2004 To: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager CITY OF CHANHASSEN City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN (_ 55317 From: Tom Berge, Executive Director of Finance and Operation 1. Date: 12/14/2004 Re: Trail Access to Middle School West Site We are writing to request extension of a trail from the proposed Crestview Drive to the Middle School West Site. The request is submitted to facilitate student pedestrian access to the site via the trail as an alternative to bus transportation for the neighborhood. The trail will also provide adult residents access to the school site for recreational purposes during non -school hours. Your consideration of this plan modification is sincerely appreciated. CITY OF CHANHASSEN MEMORANDUM 7700 Market Boulevard PC Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 TO: Robert Generous, Senior Planner Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal Fax 952.227.1110 Fax: 952.227.1110 December 7, 2004 Building InspectionsDATE: I have reviewed the proposed subdivision for the above project. In order to comply Phone: 952.227.1180 with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division, I have the following Fax: 952.227.1190 SUBJ: Preliminary plat review for a 5 lot subdivision with variances on 3.36 acres of land zoned single family residential, RSF, District Engineering located at the end of Crestview Drive. Applicant is Lecy Brothers Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Homes. Finance Planning Case: 05-02. Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 I have reviewed the proposed subdivision for the above project. In order to comply Park a Recreation with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division, I have the following Phone: 952 Fax: 952.227.1110 fire code or city ordinance/policy requirements. The plan review was based on available information submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard submitted, the appropriate code or policy items will be addressed. Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 1. No buming permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs Planning a must either be removed from site or chipped. Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 2. A 10 -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, Fax: 952.227.1110 trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. Public Works This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by 1591 Park Road firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227 1310 3. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be Senior center installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and Phone: 922227,1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 duringthe time of construction except when approved alternate methods of P PP protection are provided. Temporary street signs shall be installed on each street Web site intersection when construction of the new roadway allows passage by vehicles. www.cichanhassen.mn.us Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. gAfety\mhplrev05-02 The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a champing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Date: December 6, 2004 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department &n p,'L4 1 zigld 4 By: Robert Generous, Senior Planner Subject: Preliminary plat review for a five lot subdivision with variances on 3.36 acres of land zoned Single - Family Residential, RSF, District, located at the end of Crestview Drive. Applicant — Lecy Bros. Homes. Planning Case: 05-02 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on December 3, 2004. The 60 -day review period ends February 1, 2005. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on January 4, 2005 at 7:00 p.m in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than December 23, 2004. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official U Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprind(Jnited) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 13. Other — Independent School District 276 14. Other - .-. ..r -4 Of n"¢ see. 3, T. //6, 12 Z3 'e✓ a' Secfien 3 7-//6, •Q.z3 04n/)- 1710/7"enll r 1 nT I �z-zz-a9 �ovo�A�y 1 Mrrbf a,uh aMt d+ia is a vue atM coreaa repaenaum of a tuna of FiM Mo. 11M Ewn.Yna of tM blare dawn ed IaM and of tM b ati no1 an w &nqs. if Mv. tMtadn• uW JI ri.m. ennoacnnKnta, A ane• from 6' 77 YC. a on to d'a . _,•1h,,,,,, � e�7�>;, &Y Aa wrMd M ma tMt �j. Book —Page VV de I SE¢ of NWg sec. 3, 7-11el e z3 f EXHIJ3IT_ PRELIMINARY - PLAT CLiII/C-I V ^i,rlITInA N No Sr�`� lid 4- \069 N v\ e o ti s13 ♦ Vi eK�''v��EcJ A99�34� \ 1 -OUT LO ase \ 37e---- c !0 v ``Lag \, - 2.12 AllL�y � \ � � � \ \ ✓ameS .B: � \ \ \ t 1 \ \ 0/'o5"E 1 I .,. -SSW. lc! of -"64 01AWg \ \ 1 1 I I 1 Selo. 3, r. /ic,.2.23 \ t 1 \moi/// line of S 4 0l� /VW4 ter o,Selsf/orf 3 7-.116. e23 i sae.3, T/14, PZ3 "oan/I- /7701ul77enl /2 -ZZ -89 7z,po6e.9yhy 1 MnW m SC IMI Nn i„ v i d I&anen t tN'cnaVQn of ll rvey of File No. IIY ��Ma OI IM i�OVe GepiO[U I,IIE MQ OI IM Ipe,VOn of all ;L if ally. IMrpn, ,M all ri,i0k eno%oe{e.,Mwnn..l ,M. lium w o:(;��d 11; W QVC• Ml -V'd yy ma lln, "//Wol l/71 Lf'198�r;� EXH_IPIT- r PRELIMINARY PLAT CLJIvci v n nn1-rInAA AUG. 9.2004 3:06PM SOMMERER & SCHULTZ, P.A. Attorneys at Law 1219 Marquette Avenue, Suite 300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 333-3322 (612) 333-0747 fax Facsimile Cover Letter To: Roy From: w Cbe ( 6- c�C► W l Date: Re: Number of pages, including cover letter: 3 N0. 631 P. 1 Note: If you do not receive all of the pages, please call us at the above telephone number_ 0 Note: The information contained in this facsimile message may be privileged or confidential. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above_ If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is neither intended nor permissible. If you have received this facsimile in error, please immediately notify us by telephone and return the original to us at the above address. OD r E, s;. aWa•o _ � I - I.tl FF --------- e •I <� R � I 5} � ! P •I' I Is" !j F:� .ctlrfaFipt p x SSSI! d " tl 1g TERRA ENGINEERING, It D 5 PRELIMINARY PLAT ' u ' 0 600/ Gleneootl Ave :.� z e E i i r«nneuow;r, .wv ss+zz pim �, CHCHAANHASSSEEN. MINNESOTA d.. .. . ,... o.. � w�+n - �•p •• •+9 - ca. off o o s! or - ' A r N e •I <� R � I 5} � ! P •I' I Is" !j F:� .ctlrfaFipt p x SSSI! d " tl 1g TERRA ENGINEERING, It D 5 PRELIMINARY PLAT ' u ' 0 600/ Gleneootl Ave :.� z e E i i r«nneuow;r, .wv ss+zz pim �, CHCHAANHASSSEEN. MINNESOTA d.. .. . ,... o.. � w�+n - �•p •• •+9 - ca. a / I tll➢S3NNIN 'N3SSVHNtlHJ AMAIS3M'O o Ntl"Id AIM.M AWNINIl3Md ^? a 4 Z 6 U W M N IL m N b 8 8 � t N f U u 3 ^' O II ao F3 Ai0 t � yr S g R e r 99 o n N IL m 8 8 � N a� S� E II ao $ Ai0 yg` o n N IL m f1W1fYlE I'W.IY123HO fyy` 22YSS NII 'S,�IedeiNy/ • WW 4 1 a -v pooA-Z IMM NV111 NIIIVA7L353Md 33tl1 a P y�j s! .• + /NYId _UM11i�J 1�VONIMO AMVNULLl3Sd 41'E)NIN33NIEJN3 VNN31 A t s e O R � ��R4tE�PAA+n aR _ 0 ! � 4} Y _a EEP ��€tilt I iiia Y x::" : § 35z ❑ 51 � t S If H c•Y}t} 6D 8� (( Y� Y i� f�{d�gt lb 3 YR Aa SAI Y as cu �oj0 i Y I • '-I ry N PCI ,WiB` zA l 8 Wj I l jlli ; 4 � • • • n 1 MCPJ .,...L=•• • •, ; 1 •, °A � g ao::"a_ :p I i ✓� 511; � Ah / � 3 �j - .. a' al �1�1 d" .X9D6 [Oo J . r. uw a 9C.IE �9$ ] ry IYNIX 1 1 1 • 1 I � 1 s I I I Kiri n � .l r poo. aNj rrov —_ II''JNIN33NION3 VNN31 s- "e x x@ I3 S, I ••••• _ .� .r..+'. tl10.S3NNIN A31AlS383 X I I D Nru 3d%=N 1 AHVNna-Md c a @ U 8 F N 11 MCI e �e 0.p !1... �RSICCx0.l Xr �' -} yy - qE F ^�:s 9seiF La w tom' P 5 _, AND D`eCRIPTI01NI FOR: CHARLES SPEVACEK E. LINE OF LOT 3,— SIX. 1, PLEASANT HILL 7 11 NW COR. OF LOT 1 — 5HNELr ADDITION -1_ S'y EXTENSION OF THE WEST LIN: -=-i / � I \I r' ♦ I al ;,y •� To's6, E. LINE I I • I ♦ !� PLEASANT HILL LINE OF LOT 4.\• ORAINAIX ♦♦ ?BS BLK. 1, PLEASANT WILL; %'Axa uAUT- ♦ 2d EASEMENT .d r' ♦ l I LOT .4 ' A? $.II INE or PLEASAVT MLI, 587'12'20-E - 4- _ ♦� I_ .N87.'45'79'W. ".260.00: I :..... ... b! SL7NE.,OF„ LOT .7 d BLK, 1, SHNELY ADD.- ice OF LOT 4. BLK. 1, PLEASANT HILL I I L'"' - l , ` •rte52d'S0" OR.. n'M ------ .No ulvrr WII ,I�--------------- E•SSv IT 1 1 ;I In �. •'' r'' of hl wl la $ I it l 2 _ Eli 0 Ni hS I 7 J s i vi a I W_223.70�_--_--__J CRESTVIELANE EXISTING LEGAL -DESCRIPTION: NE COR. OF LOT SHIVELY ADCFON Let 4, Block 7, P/eosont ,fills, oecorrYmg to the recorded plat thereof, end that part of the Southeast quorter of the Northwest Outlets, of Section 3, Township 716, Range 22, Corner County, krinnesata lying northerly of the North line of SHIVELY ADDITION and its easterly extension, oCCOPci lg to the recorded plat thereof; lying southerly of the South line of said PLEASANT MILL, according to the recorded plat thereof; lying easterly of the southerly extension of the cost line of L� 3. Block 7 said PLEASANT HILL; and lying Westerly, of the southerly extension of the East line of sold PLEASANT HILL. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONI Thal part of Lot 7, Block 1, SHIVELY ADOMON, aewrdxtg to the recorded plat thereof, described as commencing at o pain: on the Nor/'I fine of said Lot 1 distant 35.18 feet easterly from the Northwest comer of said Lot 1: thence South 87 degrees 45 minutes 19 Seconds East, assumed bearing along the North line of said Lot 11 a dislonce of 224.82 feet to th. Northeast comer of said Lot 1; thence South 02 degrees 28 minutes 75 Seconds West, Bong the east Fine of sold Lot 1, 29.34 feet; thonoe South 85 degrees 26 minutes 50 seconds West 230.37 fest to the Southerly extension of the West line Of Lot 4, Block 1, PLEASANT HILL, according to the recorded plot thereof; thence North 06 degrees 79 minutes 44 s4co= East, Wong sold southerly extension, 56.75 feet to the point of beginning. AREA OF SHADED PARCEL • 9,717 SO. FT Scale t"= 50' 1 Drawn By. ' CJP I Book: XXX Pg.: XX I Disc: 96682 1 .lob No.: 96682hS o Denotes Iron Set 1 • Denotes Iron Found I Bearings shown ore on an assumed datum. W+ MJeoy Certify that Int, ie o true and correct rcaresentotion of a survey of the a:unaa,iet of the Goo" deserioCa lend Cho of the to n of Dao i any, Ih%reon. and on vfsiblt encrOtIch lent*. if any, from n sal a ` B t Doted this 4?ly' day at JO'/7UOl'✓ y,1997 Minnesota L'•c. No. 7776' LAND EURVZTORS VW LEXW3TON AVE NO. CIRCLE leMb. MWISOTA 5504-•3b. TBL.1ee-53c6 F 116-60-07 AUG. 9. 2004 3:06PM Z7.1:11tsl•r E 5< :TCI AND DE6CR i PT i oft FOR: DICK HERBOLT z X� vV 3h ri1�� e�P / P -J, o S80'45'09'W \ \C � 1 / E. LINE OF LOT 3. I 0 70 1 61 ;+Da.wAtE SLK. 1, PLEASANT HILL I ' AMO ulun t I n 1\' EASEMENT ^1 % LOT 3 wS \\.S. UNE OF PLEASANT HILL I 1 4p� 192.50 To Ion . o. NORTH ON Sly EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 3, ELK. 1, PLEASANT HILL ` �9.1e oa 1 bN - 1-0, DRUNACE-------. II NI IN i :, AND UIUT'Y EASEMENT ZI 1 I H z o O Jr TI LSI ' 7I1 b EXISTING LE AL DESCRIPTION. CRESTVIEW LANE N0. 637 Lot 3, Bleak 7, PLEASANT MILL, according to the recorded plot thereof end that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest 0'.'arter of Section 3, Township 116, Range 22, Cower County, IAinneacta lying northerly of the North Fine of SH;VELY ADDITION, OccO-ding to the recorded plot thereof; lying sevtherly of the South line of PLEASANT MILL. according to the recorded plat thereoh and lying westerly of the southerly extension of the cost line of Lot 3, Block 7 said PLEASANT MILL. P20POSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION PAECEI AThat part CVtlot A, SHIVELY ADDITION, according to the recorded plot thereof described as beginning at the Northwest corner of said Outlot A: thence South 02 degrees 28 minutes 15 seconds West. assumed bearing• along the west fine of said Outlet A. 0 distance of 92.64 feet; thence North 80 degrees 19 minutes 24 sseonds East 739.16 feet themes North 84 degrees 22 minutes 25 seconds East 21.06 feet to the east line of said Outict A: thence North 02 degrees 28 minutes 15 seconds East 61.01 feet to the Northeast comer of said Outlot A; then" North 67 ditgrees 45 minutes 19 seconds Wool. along the North line of said Outlet A , a distance of 156.90 feet to the point of beginning. PARC I R' That port of Lot 1. Block 1, SHIVELY ADDITION. according to the recorded plot thereof described as beginning Of the Northwest corner Of said Lot 1; thence South 87 degrees 45 minutes 19 seconds East. assumed bearing• along the North fine of said Lot 1, o distance of 35.18 feet to the southerly extension of the East line of Lot 3. Block 1, PLEASANT HJLL, according to the recorded plot thereof.. thence Sevin 06 degrees 19 minutes 44 seconds West, along :cid savlherly extension 56.87 feet: thence South 84 degrees 22 mingles 25 seconds West 31.67 feet to the west fine of said Lot 1: I hence North 02 degrees 28 minutes 15 seconds Lost, along said West line, 61.01 feet to the point of beginning. AREA OF SWADED PARCELS • 13.903 SQ. FT .Cale 1'•= 50' I Drawn By. CJP I Book: XXX Pg.: XX I Disc: 96682 I Job No.: 96682hs Denotes Iron Set a Denotes Iron Found I Beorinos shown ore on on ossumed datum. We hereby certify that this ig a true and correct relfe:entatian or o svr y of the I SfILRUD t BONS, INC. boundaries of the above descrAea land end of the 1Q,"ton o bu .n any. BAND eIJRY—EYOR6 thMon. Ono all rifible enotooChments. if any, from r *an s C d -i. }_ S150 L.E NWON AYs. NO. Dated this Ey. V.➢O�— GRDLS PINES. MILNIE90 A 550"-30?5 23rd day ar r ,1997 Minn esoto Lia. No. mr.� T� ggy_5956 FAC 9a6-bCOl POM : TEPP.A PFGINEEPING INC. FAX NO. : 763-512-0717 Rpr. 26 2005 12:46PM P1 TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. FROM : TERRA ENGINEERING INC. FAX NO. : 763-512-0717 Apr. 26 2005 12:47PM P2 DEMARS-GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lane North Suite 111 Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763/559-0908 Fax: 763/559-0479 TO:C/fy 0/1 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Prints ❑ Attached ❑ Plans LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE / O-5 JOB NO. ATTENTION. _ RE ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order the following items: COPIES DATE NO DESCRIPTION rr 25.69 e0 /256 � . �`►� THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use Remarks ❑As requested ❑ For review and comment A CEIVED�EN COPY TO: Very truly yours, DEMARS-GABRIEL LAND SURVERYORS, iNC. SIGNED:I!� C�.�27r-- 76-3- � tea- 0q0 If enclosues are not as noted, kindly notify us at once SCANN[D PLEASE PRINT CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Applicant Name and Address: ,-_y b3Rns �to�-, E Contact: Phone:(p W-'7)3-ZZ53Fax: 56;7-- 0i 4Z-IOCZ Email: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review � �Site Plan Review' r' Subdivision' Contact: Phone: Email: r Planning Case No. CITY OF OEC ANEHDSSEN APR 1 8 2005 C r A5 d ✓ _ _,.✓CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT ccWIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII - Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost" - $50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $400 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ '* Zig An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/2" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 ('.tif) format. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT N LOCATION: LEGAL DES TOTAL ACREAGE: WETLANDS PRESENT: YES V NO PRESENT ZONING: 4-) > V REQUESTED ZONING: 9 S PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: ✓ti0.Zc_ iRx-�� 1 y REASON FOR REQUEST: 5 04f - This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any Uriza, proceedwith the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of I� Vgnature e of Applicant D to � A y of Fee Owner Datb SCANNED G:\plan\for s\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 3/05 DEMARS- GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. Phone 763-559-0908 Fax 763-559-0479 3030 HARBOR LANE NO., SUITE 111 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 April 15, 2005 LECY CONSTRUCTION, INC. CRESTVIEW LOT TABULATION Lot Area Width @ Setbacks 1 50,232.82 Sq. Ft. 300 ft. 2 18,568.02 Sq. Ft. 80 ft. 3 22,282.44 Sq. Ft. 80 ft. 4 15,434.81 Sq. Ft. 80 ft. 5 16, 403.76 Sq. Ft. 77 ft. Right of Way 23,945 09 Sq. Ft. N/A Total Area 146,866.94 Sq. Ft. N/A (3.37 acres) CITY OF CH RECEIDSSEN VE �,'YA.-P_R 1 8 2005 N PLANNING DEPT SCANNED as u. nl n c Q S :g r�t-c- n R P n1ls '7-4-) 7X J) T P t 7-- -CTE NS ; D n! Tv Ac's �J TMJ r ✓ �o�,a �1� tom. nJ�; �.. � �� - � ; M TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • CONSULTING February 28, 2005 Bob Generous City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Preliminary Plat Review Crestview (5 lots) Chanhassen, MN TE #04-108 IMT. W:Zd71 6001 Glenwood Ave. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 Phone: 763-593-9325 Fax: 763-512-0717 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEivED F r- 8 Z 8 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT As we discussed, attached are the following revised submissions (dated 2/28/05) for preliminary plat review (10 full size; 1-11x17; 1-8.5x11): Sheet 1 Existing Conditions Plan Sheet 2 Preliminary Plat Sheet 3 Preliminary Utility Plan Sheet 4 Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan/ Tree Preservation Plan Sheet 5 Preliminary Landscape Plan This preliminary plat submittal has been revised based on our recent conversations and the comments from the 1-4-05 Planning Commission meeting. Please schedule this project for the 3-14-05 City Council meeting. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please call. 4 /�, Peter J. Knaeble TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. CC: Roy Lecy/Andy Johnsrud, Lecy Bros. Homes (w/ 2 encl.) TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • CONSULTING February 22, 2005 Bob Generous City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Preliminary Plat Review Crestview (5 lots) Chanhassen, MN TE #04-108 Dear Bob: 6001 Glenwood Ave. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 Phone: 763-593-9325 Fax: 763-512-0717 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED FEB 2 4 2005 CHANHASSEN PLMMND DEPT As we discussed, attached are the following revised submissions for preliminary plat review (10 full size; 1-11x17; 1-8.5x11): Sheet 1 Existing Conditions Plan Sheet 2 Preliminary Plat Sheet 3 Preliminary Utility Plan Sheet 4 Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan/ Tree Preservation Plan Sheet 5 Preliminary Landscape Plan This preliminary plat submittal has been revised based on our recent conversations and the comments from the 1-4-05 Planning Commission meeting. ¢CANNED Please schedule this project for the 3-14-05 City Council meeting. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please call. Sincerely, Peter cvlh� (/. ///ff. to J. Knaeble TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. CC: Roy Lecy/Andy Johnsrud, Lecy Bros. Homes (w/ 2 encl.) ",,1NNE4 02/17/0512:13 FAX 9529421068 LECY BROS HOMES OFFICE 952-944-9499 FAX 952-942-1068 CONTACT: ANDREW JoHNSRUD @ 612-703-2253 FAX Transmission Letter Date: � 17L� z— X7-11 iZ� Company: C't--j mil Ch> ha m Attn: J�"Og Pages: (including this one) Message: C, Ca 00 1 ,- ' �£ 4.s b 'rte Thanks For Your Time Andrew Johnsrud Please call sender at (952) 944-9499 immediately if there is any problem in receiving this transmission. Thank you. 01/18/05 14:49 FAX 9529421068 f ils-*'14k Lecy Bros. Homes LECY BROS HOMES ra 002 15012 Highway 7 — Minnetonka, MN 55345 Office: (952) 944-9499 • Fax: (952) 942-1068 www.fecybros.com License #20325555 January 18, 2005 City of Chanhassen Attn: Planning Department 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 This is a formal request to waive the city review time until February 28, 2005 on our proposed Crestview development. City staffs continued addition of requirements to our 4 lot subdivision to service the new Lundgren Bros./Plowshares development forces us to delay and look at other possibilities for the property. Our property was previously subdivided into a single family lot and an outlot. The outlot was to be served by an extension of Crestview Road and was sized to accommodate 4 future single family lots. Our development plan has 4 single family lots but with an adjustment to the location of the Crestview Road to better utilize the land and save trees. Staffs first requirement was to connect our development to the Lundgren/Plowshares development with a 60' road which decreased the buildable width of each of our 4 lots by 15'. Even so we reluctantly agreed to build the road. Staffs last requirement to build a trail across our property to the school has major implications for us and our neighbors. First, we would again lose another 10' buildable width on one of our lots. Second, and of prime importance, it would put an unwanted intrusion of privacy in our backyard, the backyard of our neighbor to the east, and the backyard of our neighbor to the north. Those neighbors, even though the trail would impact the value of their property, appear to have no voice in the trail decision because the trail would physically be built on our property. 01/18/05 14:50 FAX 9529421068 LECY BROS HOMES City of Chanhassen —1/18/05 -- page two The Lundgren/Plowshares development will have over 50 new homes, we would have 4. They have access to the school property that would not impact the value or privacy of any lot in their development. The construction of the trail would be difficult, but most certainly could be done. Since the development of our property is on hold, we want to insure that sewer, water, and storm water ponding that was planned for our hook-up is completed and available to this property in the future. Sincerely, P�n d� ,B-c-�' LacyRoy Z003 01/18/05 12:53 FAX 9529421068 Lecy Bros. Homes www.lecybros.com Date: Company: Attn: Pages: From: Message: LECY BROS HOMES c1" 15012 Highway 7 — Minnetonka, MN 55345 Office: (952) 944-9499 • Fax: (952) 942-1068 License #20325555 FAX Transmission Letter qsa.-� I 1 o -!D (including this one) Tari Hauntv LicA,, Please call sender at (952) 944-9499 immediately if there is any problem in receiving this transmission. Thank you. FROM : TERRA ENGINEERING INC. FAX NO. : 763-512-0717 Dec. 14 2004 03:48PM P1 TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. CMI, ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - CONSULTING 6001 Glenwood Ave. Minneapolis. Minnesota 55422 Phone: 763-593.9325 Fax: 763-512-0717 FAX TRANSMISSION TO: C FAX#: Cti7'07(-7✓.5-2 WE ARE SENDING YOU: DATE DESCRIP'T'ION THESE ARE FAXED AS CHECKED BELOW: For your approval F your information REMARKS: FROM: ��J. E1 ' e 1/ � 0 DATE FILE NO. TAS PAGE 1 OF I RE: CJacj�v: :n.✓ As request For you review and comment �-4 r, 2-y 2, CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION APPLICANT: %�Y PRoczEn, ADDRESS: I SD L Z �+ --0 Y11 -Le-to,-7 Gka, o, �s�s�.3�s TELEPHONE (Day Time) OWNER: LOGY e:>R.os. Hb, ,tom ADDRESS: I SC7IZ'� TELEPHONE: PISZ—�i9� �4 i Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Interim Use Permit Variance Zod oo Non -conforming Use Permit Wetland Alteration Permit Planned Unit Development* Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Notification Sign Site Plan Review* _ Escrow for Filing Fees/Attomey Cost'* - $50 CUP/SPR/VACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $400 Minor SUB J Subdivision' �� —� �� TOTAL FEE$ (�. 00 Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application -OR- the City can provide this list (Carver County properties only) for an additional fee to be invoiced to the applicant. If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this bo7r-EV Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. *Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/x' X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. '*Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. FRU1 : TERRA ENGINEERING INC. FAX NO. : 763-512-0717 Nov. 19 2004 03:49PN P3� - PROJECT NAME: C c s 4 ✓: a✓ LOCATION: v p� c C r L; d a �✓ l% LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CSr TOTAL ACREAGE: 3, C A --- WETLANDS PRESENT: YES X NO . PRESENT ZONING: 5 F REQUESTED ZONING: t2 S PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: Ste. f o1/%✓7T, I, This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. , A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application_ will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc_ with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of m owl e. 6V br, �t � Signature of Fee Owner Date u Application Received on 1 Z 04 Fee Paid 6 'p�_ Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Thursday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. G:\pian\forms\DevclopMML Review Applic tioe.DOC I\ qv� j JvkASYNd 45Z_ SCANNED TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • CONSULTING November 29, 2004 Bob Generous City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Preliminary Plat Review Crestview (5 lots) Chanhassen, MN TE #04-108 os -(-) a 6001 Glenwood Ave. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 Phone: 763-593-9325 Fax: 763-512-0717 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT As we discussed, attached are the following submissions for preliminary plat review (26 full size; 1-8.5x11): Sheet 1 Existing Conditions Plan Sheet 2 Preliminary Plat Sheet 3 Preliminary Utility Plan Sheet 4 Preliminary Grading/Erosion Control Plan/ Tree Preservation Plan Sheet 5 Preliminary Landscape Plan Submitted under separate cover are one set of the following: * Development Review Application form and fees. SCANNED We have met with the planning and engineering staff on 10/1/04 and 11/12/04 to review this project. This preliminary plat submittal has been revised based on comments from these meetings. Please schedule this project for the 1-4-05 Planning Commission meeting and for the 1-24-05 City Council meeting. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please call. Sincerely, �ety- � lzx Peter J. Knaeble TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. CC: Mark Lecy/Andy Johnsrud, Lecy Bros. Homes (w/ encl.) RECEIVED TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. OCT 2 5 2004 CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - CONSULTING 6001 Glenwood Ave. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 Phone: 763-593-9325 Fax: 763-512-0717 TRANSMITTAL TO: DATE (0�(9,/'.1 FILE NO. RE: Cr j t'. I CJ Cha _ Ct0e7 Sj�' WE ARE SENDING YOU _ Attached _ Under separate cover via the following items: COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: For your approval Fory� our mformatio REMARKS: copy to: /-/�o�1C Lucy BY- f PC / � - r � \ e-,Q— =�reviewa�n Jr /('i (NVOd.^C n-. (064 data & trans. trans. only FROM : TERRA ENGINEERING INC. FAX NO. : 763-512-6717 Sep. 28 2004 03:31PM P1 TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • CONSULTING 6001 Glenwood Ave. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 Phone: 763-593-9325 Fax: 763-512-0717 FAX TRANSMISSION TO: FAX 1t: WE ARE SENDING YOU: DATE DESCRIPTION THESE ARE FAXED AS CHECKED BELOW: For your approval — For your information REMARKS: FROM: h /o 9'- c.<,'- DATE `a �z �'% ti FILE NO. TIME PAGE 1 OF 3 RE C�.sd As requeste r you review and commen c< � <Lz �Q1 a`F, G42'.I CC^sd . Location Map Crestview Subdivision (Shively Addition Replat) Planning Case No. 05-02 6"NIM yaw°rtY_ lis 1��j♦ti)♦ NOW �� . �0111104 f � / I \\ vC 1 G ! E N -- ,1 V OMY ALMW iar ar ma 1 , ; Ylp[Ma b' f1 1_______� 1 ,E2CE-6.E31U 0 4 !! 2z.4s NN •=„moo PMAIS3N3 d �ONI'ONRI33NI�E)JNgN3 Vii2131 L1 . ti i NWld SNIQIIUNO3 'JMISM Rp z �Iro i F 2 W o Z z z > c1x g =w a UU z 0 W = R LL W 0 U /I a Q QpZJ c Z J J�Qw d dWJd Q \6Q N Y � U 1 1 " I afEfa4 MJJJWJ i '� WWWWW X1'LL'KLL'h' ) pwaaa�d d iN M rr�cum< N N i•.iww ww w Yv=i=NN VIi N N M 0 VilIS3NNIN 'N3SSVMVH7 PMAIS3N3 L1 . ti i NWld SNIQIIUNO3 'JMISM i F z J a z 0 W 2 Z p Q a Q QpZJ J J�Qw d dWJd \6Q N Y � Z �Z �F•'yr.P fI �JrKQQ PdpU�J Z p}}}WY zW ozzz z " I afEfa4 MJJJWJ i '� WWWWW X1'LL'KLL'h' ) pwaaa�d d iN M rr�cum< N N i•.iww ww w Yv=i=NN VIi N N M 1 % I / 1 II T E S9m 1 m o- Q4 p^. s 4 04*10 Rsr ®0�� 1 4 4? 1 4R. 1 4 s is 4Q 1s I k 4 4 — -- - — -- —' pp,s I N NNNN I n m mmmm rrvl �b� I i �" m ;� v-Ivv7� m 1 2XIEZzmommin n ,MH ] DDA"rn " y0 D map. 9 rZy2 Z mo ` $SC]■ n n o ilgl] E r _ C i 2 i TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. E d EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN A.,. �.ti �p� �ren.00y e Y a F� I I S Seca;:. MN ssza ~ m CRESTVIEV 2 ,� CNANNASSFN. MTNNF=A .� —.. ..... ,.. _,....._..,_„_„„,. I tl10S3NNEN'N3SSVHNM azc=-ns<ao 7f� A3Ih1S3M3 N' E 220x^ NN spoCoawq `^�+, •y„� N p Y PPP,ual'J l009; p _ 4_ ldld AiItlNIWI-138d e 'JNI'=JNIN33N1=JN3 VlfN31 0 s- e R ;T = e 7 + 'n � 9 ■t'scbf x x L®s5exsse. E.fSff t Eti#yi s E^}; Js�-. sass: i0f� Jsio �FE{i EE�� SI �E X46 �hJ 51 IS. �s8 t j ] \ \ .t i8y Sbj I N 1 I O g p ' �we�• 9 �/ N a 1 - cu rN a3so Y y O_ I Pitate „o/ ` Lj �SIN 1,,✓ 1 i� r tl l 1� �/ �t P_ =f I 3 1 1. v M..� .w.o o • M w n 9C=IC I m6S 3 p 1T111M .p� ` I JSJP � I t P I ViM31R1IN 'N3SSVHNVHJ e aan-rssew 7 i p ,••� * AMA1S3MJ PEj g zzrss NM '+moa _�$., yy f 9 •• o i Ntlld A1Imf1 AMtlNINIl3Md r b I 1 I 1 X11 m LST rr� I/8 p, N N R i Ws s \\,I Lia?Nt to �fif M/ `may Ake e�I�m Oj r......n,n .vTd6 pLPpdt, e..... •.o ., ., x. 41� 41 o, , , >3 I ,IJ,O a N Y f s U ^ O S [yam JF �.., LST rr� I/8 p, N N R i Ws s \\,I Lia?Nt to �fif M/ `may Ake e�I�m Oj r......n,n .vTd6 pLPpdt, e..... •.o ., ., x. 41� 41 o, , , >3 I ,IJ,O a -ees-ron zzras aps�roeoa��N y p...ua�9 1po9 'ONI'sJNIH33Nl'JN3 VlY2131 Its i V10S3NNIAY 'N3SSVHNVH3 /91A1S3N3 _ e Fd em i aEq- - — NVId Nm1VAN3SZd 33N1 Ntlld 10p 1N07 pIDISHil3/9IIUtlYY7 ANVNINIl3Nd _ _cif s.ii((t :: E t � .DjQ iii!lij�d� ;��L �0.�•`�T Ise YYYY Y Y Y?� b'' AI SD 3F { q d b ?s9 jj e@i 6 p5 a i6 u n u � i(9 t Yq $Iig •4� 3 � �I ¢e :'a_ ��4 bv� � ny SSRI 105 — ii• T ra — :V bid—� rs, °'""'• ^'^' °""'^'O ^' tl10S3NNIN 'N3SSVHNtlH7 a aaa-uc-csn 3 ! 7 013Ih1S380 c 22YaS N4 'ANdoan�y f i NYId 3dtl7StJNtlI AtltlNIMIl3Md 1 Lo NI'DNI833NPJN3 VNE131 s a f'�iv FFFi:fA?f it I I bel � A. P J,F JONi II ss IS• •6 Sas :I p 07 "II I • I 6¢6 u ^ _O I ga F; 4i \28 i � a"""y •'^^+aa I >a, gam`- � `I ®� - 1v:ate WES � u I 4� J I u� YYi3 (Y)a z N m Mr wrr� n •1426 (.OP[M) w. nn .ro n .a 9CIIC SOS 310YW ISLI vMlll>IUN 'aew a I �4.+ •tiw I fl {{I 1 'fill ? 1 l41 p . I 101 N w �Qy ,\J �Z 1 ro ♦� wwLLSMl."\H y 4, n M74 AZA.. Plealspnt Hill --9r3 -- 416.9I m 8� WI tiJ5 i1-' (�-39.16 dl . 1060 6 ' J Po J II CF I_ a (51605T C3"06 16 Clip" till,0. i� lT 06 06(§' JL�10-04. —� Ex. Ouuttlot A. Shl etey ABdtlo _ t Q meyaoMelrv> lewr0e'ei .s1 416. Cx.., 1 fence a Dock 1 ROPOS D PINb owshares a pment 1 than Franz n e 8 y� � 1 36t-0832 Nat" 9 36 Prelim. In En r.- Westwoo P ofessi Chris Moehr P 952-937-515 6 I I9 x 4y tree canopy rover area / vevor 10/04) _ 6 Ex. House 6 Larkin ",—Ex. House LS, Bl lA, 12 tax 4 Abbtett 1�(:56 (X6 ;moo 16,- - O e _ W Ex. n i-rce / Z4 / q~ Ex. House tl / P� / Vv Z ti Ex. Son Ex. 22' W. 1 1 x CB my dFners> r 91 1 1068 — 43 tS) PoW + 1 3 p�lzl`�•aMock 2 °rq -Inc. 1 2 N W 0 b 60 SCNE N FEET RoyLec Roy OP� Lecy Brothers Hones 15012 Hwy. 7 Mtka., MN 55345 952-944-9499 ENINDEM Peter Knaeble, PE Terra Engineering Inc. 6001 Glenwood Ave. Mots., MN 55422 763-593-9325 SMVEYM David Crook, RLS Demars-Gobrlel Surveyors 3030 Harbor Ln, kill Plymouth, MN 55447 763-559-0908 % I ; Un 21 QL to % ro O N °i n Gad 1 lZ eI ^ Y enc Z Q a 0 V1 y Z W O Z M Z Q i Z C3 i z 1-1 y Z M a H r WQ W V U SHEET 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 11/22/04 _ SHEET 2 PRELIMINARY PL T 2 W 2 SHEET 3 PRELIMINARY UT ITY PLAN "m""` 04-108 U U SHEET 4 PRELIMINARY GRA ING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN/ CO w TREE PRESERVATI N PLAN a � SHEET 5 PRELIMINARY LAND APE PLAN 1 I[ 2 111 1[) C3 Q 0 O 2 2 W C 2 oo a U U a 001 CO w � � z U a U • tiEl EGx. rrSa. j leve— ._ FftilM x. H LS. BI L.. ffi 6ii1111 * Hit Rd. z - ,6e a v S _ I Plea\spnt Hlll whe. ,ow+�� N W Y lI 1 \ LU41 s s C9 ts* O" 11 W �a ate, .9 /We u I 2 .37 _ g..� / V d N c OE 6'_..— c ti 139.16 19. E-" ------------ -------'- I ^O/ SO 0 30 60 ac• - _ IB of orldrvU Ec OOt� o, Y Sc4E w 1EET L .0 Lot 1� 0 .r Q 8.606 rf 1\ \ /a `0 I D 1 ;I W / A,, a+ Ex Ex. Horse I Jackson / Ex. House 'L F \ \ Pat B l 0 1 I �P�tiV o.16.t� .w ••+r ••rtr+ nw" ■w•t+ see�__ Tin Larkin r O Ism. lot rrmme+ 1W Wvt�Is 90• et x• rsn r c aS.a `tqa V Mn lot d Pth 125'mox i Poi / `✓-. $1�Rr. torbie`.tbod, W bt,a vw. for 257 =' w 1 / i 9M t wb°a to, C! 0• comtr) Yrpo tJr. RN to be vacottd I �� front/rnr eue. IW Ryw ,WL Ex +' F_ I ! I ^ ` i ° _ J a i� Ertl pop. street/pq0 yR MTb j No. of bb Slots a o e Rtnow tz. tltYWWf DmCtY LS urYta/ac 4 (r f (rtatwe mrM CV'b IM) Ave. Wt M.t 2!. 234 tf 3` MN som W. bt rite 15.403 ff E S u O raE W+. Ic,4 31 \_ - Futlr. cob IYw CIV 2-3) C ySs Dap F~. Sa RN Vi+ C P; pfip ee73 1 I `__ Ex 40' R/v Ji J. Oi9 i _—IOMB3%105 J� O Ib 1 \ i j0('. I i I `!0•E 1 O fJiTTVIEV� 8 ��Z 4•W ; « / bl i I I I 1ttP rtrn<-T.o-1U'i rvtW t,.t0ct,tRtM of y` b I a I i I i I (6Y Bfv.l ©tr) / 3 I O I 1 S L- / L 1I oo• 9I1 II Abblett Ex. Nouse -___________L---- .."- __II R_______ _____1_U__ Qg_ ______ ______ 5F F _—= 21/311 ti31' IS15,4033 of 111 g O J W --- _j \ ---- Ex. Dutcot P hl a ey-AcicMon �-" --- 1 E°u-- _ 1 W \ W 12140 Ex, d itrce ` Z 0Y 0.mt) (byotlMrs) 416. Ex. ntt l fo�ct aV (b otnerf) O San MM 12 my o<htr9 }/ Z 1052.00/104140 xva/GV Y otl+r5 106640/1o49.5W10Q.40 41.60') LL EB my, t> r l06B Q ock 1 ROI D PIN HURST C43 ts) — 3 z Z \ ?' owshares a pnent C �p o/ H 3W 0 Y �, than Franz In �/1 q;�a'a� \ 1 N Ny 8 E) 9-/04 61-08li ^1 ^ 'bi"t: Mock 2 J H>„= °• p 11 /04 Prelim. In N s En r1 Vestwoo P ofessio al Service Inc. °'+�o< _ — W W a �— Chris Moehrl P 'Dp a.= 952-937-515 8 \ U U 2 W 11/22/04 2 Iq{LI 1p 04-109 2 �(d Ex. House l.sz, L3. III ayv-w Aff"I.m x. Ho:. !6wloY til Ra !*+w1Y�� U. etd) Ex S'eele G1yt 64)1 y NI R0. 'MOV le L y 4L 4 euM ,9tiZ /V' Pleasant Wit W VeJ , 9 -'-___-___416 i -L__- _____________________________ 4V ip N ti��v I bl m ,qZ 230.37 .- ----� • 139.16 �_- - io•-Ees1 11 E g Ex. L.O. o1, Bock 1 Shlveley Addtion to I (tp,8)p sr origIMU Ex 6pervbus urea 4 Lot 1[8940 si (192n \ I p Ex. Ex. House Blo 1 \ I Tim Larkin Co.. 106 (1 l9 _ — _ _ _ _Ira _ 1r Z~ , q~ • To npOJ} rRLCo.* I W4 �v ((P� Owes. 1011' 1.111[ OM YrewlYl a�� >tEY1LM1 Nn. Iot arm 15,1100 sf Mn. lot fronmpe 6a ( a is 90' et SO' rSU Pusuc Vv W. tot depth Mos tot bpervbus front s.tbock t25' n% 311' 4wetl vor. for 259 1 \ CHrP�'0I 311' ,9 (� We setback fro°Vreor me. 10' (Oa comer) 10' We cos. 5' OCl ti ,s, III ----------------'�MU -Q.tiot -- "- "J Ex. Cutlot A, ShlveTey�adt.6n ay other!) (,%-, s) 416.90 Ex. rota fence Hy.G(Vy(by7othen toszoonwy.00 CB my othww) Block 1 PROPOSED PINEHURST (43 Lots) Plowshares Deve pment LLC Nathan Franzen 952-361-0832 11/5/04 Prelim. PI Engr.- Westwood P ofessional Services Inc. % Chris Moehrl P 952-937-5150 1 0 2 u, e2 Jackson _Ex RN to be vacated -- c. ioe iv ---" U. Mo16 ' 6 Ixx, 10' dn0e°! Erorp, Nest, 11c(rIolr,btQWfl. TVVp, /tr,tl rrou1l1rl „Mbyftr, r.er boxes, es, rtc My oxvwc ro to Ix. MII or Co rust be core drlled. Sen Suer 9- PVC SIRM San Servke 6' PVC swn Vatem e' PVC C -goo Voter U,vl, V Type M copper .Ertl Pro strr.t/ b ao.xai Rerov1 e.. Ue h.s (" !,tore no,th c Uw) (restore MM soot) (b lVIP cvb Uro (31' e -e) C <by --- R,tv_=V RN OM C �--Ew Prop W VM °t IoNo GV —Twp. rtreet 0, (by otvelo,or) ° Abblett s W Ex. Mwm1 privacy ferc Son MH 12 my'hers) 1066m/104850/1040Ao (17.609 1 Y Block 2 2 -- Fvt f 50' WW the r F~. V..' cmw)M 3 p 13w Q U.10 "0 S Q J W Q W CL Uv Z~ , q~ J �v ((P� Owes. 1011' 1.111[ OM YrewlYl a�� >tEY1LM1 Nn. Iot arm 15,1100 sf Mn. lot fronmpe 6a ( a is 90' et SO' rSU Pusuc Vv W. tot depth Mos tot bpervbus front s.tbock t25' n% 311' 4wetl vor. for 259 Ree, xtback 311' ,9 (� We setback fro°Vreor me. 10' (Oa comer) 10' We cos. 5' OCl ti Rerov1 e.. Ue h.s (" !,tore no,th c Uw) (restore MM soot) (b lVIP cvb Uro (31' e -e) C <by --- R,tv_=V RN OM C �--Ew Prop W VM °t IoNo GV —Twp. rtreet 0, (by otvelo,or) ° Abblett s W Ex. Mwm1 privacy ferc Son MH 12 my'hers) 1066m/104850/1040Ao (17.609 1 Y Block 2 2 -- Fvt f 50' WW the r F~. V..' cmw)M 3 p 13w Q U.10 "0 S Q J W Q W CL Uv f t0,Ei31 Bay en /4!.(r.6.r. x. H �i11aM f, $x $mle 647 14 raa M1 Rd. IF 1066 Q' t•b, A64 -�1p� Plen3pnS HIM 416. --------------------- fl . 4P_I _____________________ (� ( Baseline tree canopy over area (Per Surveyor 10/04)op m �q (q<e "I 2 .37 Q Q� W 6 139.16 " �" �� Q (56 1yE 1 1'— — t Ez. L lou Cl(--I`Addtl bolo drain to ll.. r N� IB si Cp. io [ [D3. 1 VV �7(jjj� ek�.. � L G0 If <I Ex Uo1 Ex. House Blo 1 u pee r, Tim Larkin I R tar " �.�y R . (�•}�, Y-� c�- t..�_ Vx. C1 ti,f A, Shl eley It Io r Ny°oel[it0rs) Free• CB 416. EsNt (force 6V (a fby others) Nydy lasEoono47.m W m6Vy ock 1 ROPOS D PIN HURST C43 119 \ owshares vel pment C than Franz n d. � �—' Ex. 8 A H H 9 -361-0832 I Ly /Prm. to 11 04 eli L4,32 En r.� Vesiwoo P ofessl at Service Inc. z N Chris Moehrl P 952-937-515 \ a z / NaN.•. AJdluam a' N LU LU QLn tn z C a of 11 TQ 1 1611 aYLLA17a� 1 TOTotalAte neaI dG arm 336 1 W Bau1M cmopy cover orm 239 ac. OLID of total Won 6 , 2 O P N .mpy cover ore. a97 eo (2493 of total dtt) Caarra to G Km nov1,43t 3 a mpy Q V O P / (to V.wq IHIe shoem) _ I 1 Abblett o% N a J 0 w Et ry f.me asNN 12 My o<WK) mn`wa5alo4e.4o ...609 !f \ 1 ��=:�• Block 2 gaiQ z- opBsa nolo See aty staff repion p( ort for erosc trnotes. • Trees rust W remv.d from dG or chipped fro au ,). • Tem. at, see ,/.uch rmJrm eMt 14 days iter ate W.de,a Ie co.µata. • O`Ry street --P6V a xi scraPho breed. (N necessary). pts reap'.. a ".toted hap routeM R.fM cants qm fmpor wtrq moria( (by contractor). a E3 IxH- U a Z O Vl LLI C3 Z Z W -I Z Uo z z taiWN . 0-' Q i Q LLI [aJ Q aE N Or 2 .Z � U U za _J ILI aFP 11/22/04 0~-108 .p4 �—' Ex. L4,32 ,,House z N s f \ a z / NaN.•. AJdluam a' N LU LU QLn tn z C a of TQ 1 1611 aYLLA17a� TOTotalAte neaI dG arm 336 W Bau1M cmopy cover orm 239 ac. OLID of total Won O P N .mpy cover ore. a97 eo (2493 of total dtt) Caarra to G Km nov1,43t 3 a mpy Q V O P / (to V.wq IHIe shoem) 4,N WCampy [over area rcmp enafter Wert[ a% ac. (20.65 of total site) o NN(e°°rwQpy6cpw� tt,*" 135 (464% total F 3 / at, of sive l'per City IoN. B 463 of total tlG) / .10 Addltbml canopy cover r.pbtd 039 ac . 12 • 0.71 ac 3x920 If W 0 30 60 [Ny) IOB9 Li. 4N° of Canopftiecay cover/trev111 No oP lendscoee Rees NOJKd 29 Rees red W< N FEET ASSUME 090' CROVN 6111/ CL TO f4R �Z� i4 a I ,ckson / Ex. House "t, F ~, x. blue Nn let arm ISAW sf i3 cess to Lot L Nn (o< fronto!° Nn lo< depth 9a ¢a h 90• at 3n !SB) f c 125' �V Mae W 1 t nx = N N mranmYs R.iy Front tk�c Z 30' Need vor, for 257 NV Dr d Rmr •etb.W RN to W v.c.Ud .() 9deFrol/ere ease. terve r corvtructbn (v 3a to, (30' comer) 10' Ode . .r Side x a <aln fM gMut 5' otos fx Ex Edge BI< 101 Sntrt M; _ _ [.. 100• RN Em pny. zm,* V (10,36.09) N ' Renow ... dtunmws 0$ t(f (G fMGrc north .,* the) W i(reaGK MM soaD .1 Er$� Sit Fut, . c,.•e IM <M' rd) y - (R- ot-----___---- fvtvr 50 RN 0,r - fi 3�yj� _�._ _ EM 40' RN a 01x037 Ex. Son Ex. 22' hit. g E.pBLL�' S'i 3eY i 0n._ Y�qbiiEEEES �____� QiESTVlEV a�ve� W . --T:orTS16 'T.�e 'wv sa' Ir street den Future co -W cmtarbN N Q Abblett o% N a J 0 w Et ry f.me asNN 12 My o<WK) mn`wa5alo4e.4o ...609 !f \ 1 ��=:�• Block 2 gaiQ z- opBsa nolo See aty staff repion p( ort for erosc trnotes. • Trees rust W remv.d from dG or chipped fro au ,). • Tem. at, see ,/.uch rmJrm eMt 14 days iter ate W.de,a Ie co.µata. • O`Ry street --P6V a xi scraPho breed. (N necessary). pts reap'.. a ".toted hap routeM R.fM cants qm fmpor wtrq moria( (by contractor). a E3 IxH- U a Z O Vl LLI C3 Z Z W -I Z Uo z z taiWN . 0-' Q i Q LLI [aJ Q aE N Or 2 .Z � U U za _J ILI aFP 11/22/04 0~-108 .p4 (d' Ex. House\/dP%1 \ t L3, BI tr NY-a'O i.. d0 ,[ a�a� 6464 MvroY wl Rd IBat Y.�/.N q'' `. House 64)4 M oy NI Rd u ✓` Ex. cay`.r I L .RBV e 6 q~ � �' F1 Pleasant Hitt W _-----416.9_—I I o• Asa W I 230.37 �O? 52.73 139.16 d G 11 S I_ y Ex. Lot 1, Black 1 Shlveley Addtlon V (48,818 of odgraU Ex Wgry or. Lot 1[8940 cf aeZO > 1 2 \ \ I $ Ex. Ex. House Pool 1310o 1 1 1 ` w I Tin Larkin a Bb Cf3. I Se R.R D -C w w / J \ 61 IC; IRS I •/ aC — \ ® Ro,/ / I i ®ts x I 3� i .4 So j(/v 5 x,16_Y Ex, 0utlot A, Shlveley Addtlon T Prop. n 416.90 Ex. r tm fent. av (by om.r., 0y other[)HYWW (6)'105200/104).OaCB 0.y otlxrc)Block 1 PROPOSED PINEHURST (43 Lots) Plowshares Deve 3pnent LLC Nathan Franzen 952-361-0832 �1 11/5/04 Prelim. Plo 0 1 Engr.- Vest.00d P ofesslonnt Services Inc Chris Moehrl 7 952-937-5150P 1 � 6 \ 2 1.31 91 I L4,32 Jackson _Ex RN to bt vocottd 10)0.837 ,°.� Abbtett >3= W E. .w.I .y lance 0 a)40l MWM'. WWtbn cR, ctro.Vc. ) /V = s C7 I SOME m nXT Z X N 4 LU Q s Z ¢� a Qom' V 13 d ^ W ~ gtiS �O o. M °' Uoa ��y 4P CINWO.IMMIB dmr BBaB ■Lllh' Y Mir" B1FB)BLE Mn lo! ore.15Mn.ot fronto'. 90' (c)I I. Ba at 30'FSR) PUBLICMn. lot depth 125'Mox tot .p.r.b,a nxrrant[U,ock 30' need y . for xsnReor N t RZ IW— C So o x ao PRELI11RY LAIIDSCAPE NOTES, Na of replac neat bt.L rr9Jretl 29 !r[o (per celalotlen> SOME m nXT Man bee trees/.pedr. 1/3 of total MBc Y. of cwif M. 4 M[Y4ou[ tro za 23 tl 1D d M T. Ca.iferne trn 6' ria Qom' s d tlefXd end contr ltd by MI Stotute 1&M-1841, ~ gtiS 9 E M °' COMMON/MT NNE CME 2". UM ��y 4P CINWO.IMMIB dmr BBaB ■Lllh' Y Mir" B1FB)BLE Mn lo! ore.15Mn.ot fronto'. 90' (c)I I. Ba at 30'FSR) PUBLICMn. lot depth 125'Mox tot .p.r.b,a nxrrant[U,ock 30' need y . for xsnReor VH4 P"&r Lt WP 9 8' BB ccea co(r clo 4rrm Sprott purprn. CGS 10 8' BB utbocx 30'so. BIOW wlL si ry ./Plcta auc. tlm..t. BHS 0 e BB utb.G 10' (30' (brw.r)10'gdt eau. 3' rix M cob IYI.) 'M LOA �urb Mr (31' B-8) C M ) Futv_W Sa RN q C 22' mt. DRIVE 1 W '�7a-Dpi —'Tc art sow T rutty o -..t mtwtrW nn em o.xetory ereee reour•.d N the front yerd of ..(11 lot, In adoltbn to t tree. [Moan 1 �3 Block 2 Bp[b s 6f �P Z J CIL L1 ¢ ILM N W fa Z ¢ Z J Y > z ¢ W N FZ.4 0 >¢ W W Q Of a U c=,1 11/22/04 04-108 5 PRELI11RY LAIIDSCAPE NOTES, Na of replac neat bt.L rr9Jretl 29 !r[o (per celalotlen> Man bee trees/.pedr. 1/3 of total MBc Y. of cwif M. M[Y4ou[ tro za 23 tl 1D d M T. Ca.iferne trn 6' ria Trees tl' M i n certlned rw try ctod, o tlefXd end contr ltd by MI Stotute 1&M-1841, tht Rant fest Kt COMMON/MT NNE CME 2". UM VH4 P"&r Lt WP 9 8' BB ccea co(r clo 4rrm Sprott purprn. CGS 10 8' BB 2 BIOW wlL si ry ./Plcta auc. tlm..t. BHS 0 e BB Bp[b s 6f �P Z J CIL L1 ¢ ILM N W fa Z ¢ Z J Y > z ¢ W N FZ.4 0 >¢ W W Q Of a U c=,1 11/22/04 04-108 5 y p Ymmzzzm AHAAAn zm <ne r<o c aaz-+ry I I A 94k y z s w S R8 myp�_ -rl ,zHz z vai fT1 DO g �g z nn L "has° T=9Q� ''' <z S c• S§IP z0> > - O cn z y ? m d n b • � ING, INC. TEvRiepnpdENGINEERING, �Ave.e m EXISTINCPLN M SSr22 nv-ss3-nm Y�WANWA." N. MTNNFC[ITA .� ......,.. w r.»...... - ..,,s a.,..,, - re,...e.... 22655 NN .I�oauu,y _ _ any pao.uay� 1009 f INI'[JNIfJ33Ni'JN3 V2J2131 t 8 2 p If;s.sy a °' f4e9eah-,. VIM -4 fr10 ii E7��t� Z� T AI i I 1. 2, e 1Vld kNVNIWIl3Nd ---NSSot-% -�_— —77 le 3�gv � z; o ' b x A� M OFT E3 N q��yS P S _ NI'E)NR133NIE)N3V8831l i e L g 2 0. R { F i R x u ? ap2j;p#±±a 3:� i Jd. 6 iskE6 iYl{{LBjti w 9ta ! � -. ESEP�iiti Es. p ap,, )4bJ pl •, E= it t 9 � °3� i ±sF fE .i3s'f E E e ! p� zs' iI 22 t5E f:I 2 i' P• 55 a zai I I I f E i Nww Aimn AvyNimrE d m R71 N w "-" ^-"-' ^•"" ViUSJNNIM 'NlJ.IONNONJ ATA1S3N3 g Nlld NMlVAH3S3Nd 33NA p 'ONI''JNIH33NI'JN3 V! G1 - ��?^"l-'� /NWW 1�W7 I�ISOC3,'a IWM AWNOQl3i1d t= $ + ! Pfi1 P �®RG{yCPP44±}±r a .222 .2" $ s 9Fi �s s'I �•; tv b b e 4 i.#°_i�i 1 � � � � �§•,iifi 6�s ti' {. 1 IN s � \ 5 �➢,3$� -Ila I �.� J 1! 1 �� _� `-! /�� V10S3Nt"gW NMSVHWm3 a A3IAIS383 8 LO i f a + e �RxxAP`P f 5 ii=kiaai rs�o fifi¢�i Ei tj Nis it LO [ N Cs• J btbi� a1 a a N \ R O C Fgg c �a$ w l ^ I I lV .1926 cW-mn .vu rai.m ewe m(lS ]101X 3$]� VMU3NIIX yo 4 prq •y fwlii I � 1 #1 I 'I�O�jII i I + e �RxxAP`P f 5 ii=kiaai rs�o fifi¢�i Ei tj Nis it LO [ N Cs• J btbi� a1 a a N \ R O C Fgg c �a$ w l ^ I I lV .1926 cW-mn .vu rai.m ewe m(lS ]101X 3$]� VMU3NIIX yo 4 prq •y fwlii I � 1 #1 I 'I�O�jII i I l ^ I I lV .1926 cW-mn .vu rai.m ewe m(lS ]101X 3$]� VMU3NIIX yo 4 prq •y fwlii I � 1 #1 I 'I�O�jII i I �-wsa 3 a u'rrs. Pleasant Hill 416.90' �I Baselin sl tree campy over area (Per dI (Per Surveyor 10/04) +I � �� 'tel IYA, • / o/ - rLyplr�/Addtl IR1� lock-1� lliiJJ��lI 1060 � i 3 rll.�_ (Jr. oc Ex Ex, House ii...JJ''W u Po I I i (y ` Al Tin Carlon i l 0H0 14 16 (56 Ob Ir C'f' ---------- Ex. utlot A, Shi eleyAtl(�dtlo ' = s 1 r U/22/04 l W N er wl a L3Q�-'J Ex1.41 . \H"64 1 "74No Qy I Rd. / 0A �-wsa 3 a u'rrs. Pleasant Hill 416.90' �I Baselin sl tree campy over area (Per dI (Per Surveyor 10/04) +I � �� 'tel IYA, • / o/ - rLyplr�/Addtl IR1� lock-1� lliiJJ��lI 1060 � i 3 rll.�_ (Jr. oc Ex Ex, House ii...JJ''W u Po I I i (y ` Al Tin Carlon i l 0H0 14 16 (56 Ob Ir C'f' ---------- Ex. utlot A, Shi eleyAtl(�dtlo ' I- - -1 __ C5'�" 1 Abblett o �— Ex. House L5. HI La, H2 1 w�nemtbn� U — GV le otMr.1 Sen iN N Nvyy o<Mr.) ytl/4V o<h. 1006-00/lWB.36/10a0.40 U7. cw my .) /� 1060 43ts) 1 or -� Block 2 Inc. 4 R \7 — — 21 Ex. House/ —�- 3 N = s 1 U U/22/04 Z W N PRELIMINARY PLT ay°Peetier.) awa. n 2y o MrA 416. 3 Q) of , 04_108 LU '" F la6to0noaym �Qq 4 PRELIMINARY GRA ING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN/ V `ock 1 ROPOS D p SHEET 5 PRELIMINARY LAND APE PLAN owshores e' Franz n zt>than w• 8 ", 9 -361-0832 11 /04 Prelim. I En ri Vestwoo Chris Moehr 952-937-515 S4 �r p, 4 / 11 I �•a 6 I- - -1 __ C5'�" 1 Abblett o �— Ex. House L5. HI La, H2 1 w�nemtbn� U — GV le otMr.1 Sen iN N Nvyy o<Mr.) ytl/4V o<h. 1006-00/lWB.36/10a0.40 U7. cw my .) /� 1060 43ts) 1 or -� Block 2 Inc. 4 R \7 — — 21 Ex. House/ —�- 3 N = s 1 U U/22/04 Z W N PRELIMINARY PLT W ap a W >Vy a 2 Z ¢ a 3 Q) of , 04_108 LU '" F SHEET �Qq 4 PRELIMINARY GRA ING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN/ V 0C1� W o�� p 00 0 w eo eMm 5aµ[ W nET oa CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED FEB 2 4 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT OHNER/DEVELOPM Roy Lecy Lecy Brothers Hones 15012 Hwy, 7 Mika., MN 55345 952-944-9499 ENGEM Peter Knaeble, PE Terra Engineering Inc. 6001 Glenwood Ave. Mpls., MN 55422 763-593-9325 SIIRVEYOb David Crook, RLS Demers -Gabriel Surveyors 3030 Harbor Ln, #111 Plymouth, MN 55447 763-559-0908 Z J a Q F Z W C3 W Z Q Z 3w 0 W Z �4 H Q C4 WQ W UU SCANNED SHEET 1 EXISTING COND TIDNS PLAN U/22/04 2 PRELIMINARY PLT 2 --SHEET SHEET 3 PRELIMINARY UT IT'PLAN , 04_108 SHEET 4 PRELIMINARY GRA ING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN/ TREE PRESERVATI PLAN p SHEET 5 PRELIMINARY LAND APE PLAN 1 SCANNED X01 \ oY 4. ��105H s c i 1 6474M *y Hit Rd Io66 ___E____ (� Q- Ex. Ssrlr 1064 a f� 1S I Pleasant HILI --// xWrH's Mditbn� Q' N 1062 W x eeY /O•. �� I ` LU .,t- 416 s° W .90' 1 >p3 a �� _Z v4P sl z of ' V i vi F FOP 4 An \ 52.73 Ex. •- IY Erse 1 139 1 n 79.)6 _ ___________ __- _ F- SOF s. c7 _ _ OO 30 0 30 60 r Ex. 1, lock 1 Shlveley Addtl It a 'v _ \\ pervbus w I SCKE w FEET E. Y \1060 _"' 1 rr'trl' Los l•e94o sr (19 lew As s 8 o i f\ �\ " o Ex 49aoa sr I Jackson 4 F t Ex. House Ex. House l Po , B l o i I �P� o.leH�t *.° Is h Tim Carlon )M. lot ore" �aiS r00 �� BiRer it/rtt J w. lot fronto➢. 9a Ica Is 9a' .t 30' FSI) PI lc -- ---- : B !'!'➢B77 V Hn lot 40th 125' rr I ! / b=�' �\- • rsB =1 / Z~� � mt ac W aH.d ..r. for 23n a ry tma 1p cruor) amo f1c R/V to 6e vrcrtrd / •" yhI I 50' R �. - / (V front/roof rise. 10' ww 45' R. -C --�_ - . SP6• )a,K Ot' SHe ersr. Y omH7 rJ[ - Ex Edge Bit _ '�• /'4 I , ^•� _ _. ` _�` i -� 3 I? ao 3z stnet/crb tYT[ MHTM'i rnr 3.36 oe B y RP of wt. Slots I QL�1- V_�_ _—__ _fie _ _ _ •i _ $ Raro.. rx Wturtwus D.n.tty Uvits/oa. I (to rutty rocvD IM)) o-neav .lm rosem Av➢, Wt W.. 24X34 sr € ; (675 sr{; I _+�y~ W lau lot s:e 15.363I ur f31 a _ Ers�•1)W4 a 3031 �\ - �' iutvr cvD / Ip SS➢ 1\\.0�qr,� /�_. -�- (DY otMn)____---_` ruty° W RN ,s,GQ . I q ." ) 1 )\'`b. \ \ / • / ��• +b.36\ I $y�, �- Ex 4Y R/V jtt 8 QV [+• I' )�J l (p / ^114 1z,-R/V_�-- _Ex_Sw Ew 22=Ht- -1 _—_ ^a g•3�I'E K per' D 7 Ai 1054/ r—' rss: A% Z Y. I --T idiD�i �0 c ^ rutur, , ro-..t <.ntsrt" ai { a I (b, D...(cp.r) Abblett x. H E Ouse 0 RSB __-__-__-_ __ -_-I I ' L- /V i ro ae esi_ _____ I e, 3r ➢-➢ a o, zz.xl .r Isa63 If J a _. 1 .793 sr E.v. I u Ex. 1]utloq��yil e eyTiddiTon— irxrP C➢ from• CB 416. Ex. n.t t rer¢e Ex. cY f.rce mY oMrrq (bY otMrA ev (D otlxrrs) S.n H4 le 0y others) 105200/101)m NYd/GV othe 1066mnMB.50/1049.10 CB mY r> / 106p ock 1 ROPOS D PIN HURST C43 ts)— §y f.!R. es At pnent C 3 1 3 e thon Franz n H 9 -361-08 r Block 2 + 11 /04 Prelim. la 70 1(b — En r/ Westwoo P ofesslo at Service Inc. Chris Moehr P 952-937-515 \ {71 0 — �� 2 6 I 2 Z \!H ouse tr WN M . C4 a �- Ex. House LLJ V1 Z y B LLI -C LBI 6464 M R Q UU Ex H I.S. Bl L6 B2 F X01 \ oY 4. ��105H s c i 1 6474M *y Hit Rd Io66 ___E____ (� Q- Ex. Ssrlr 1064 a f� 1S I Pleasant HILI --// xWrH's Mditbn� Q' N 1062 W x eeY /O•. �� I ` LU .,t- 416 s° W .90' 1 >p3 a �� _Z v4P sl z of ' V i vi F FOP 4 An \ 52.73 Ex. •- IY Erse 1 139 1 n 79.)6 _ ___________ __- _ F- SOF s. c7 _ _ OO 30 0 30 60 r Ex. 1, lock 1 Shlveley Addtl It a 'v _ \\ pervbus w I SCKE w FEET E. Y \1060 _"' 1 rr'trl' Los l•e94o sr (19 lew As s 8 o i f\ �\ " o Ex 49aoa sr I Jackson 4 F t Ex. House Ex. House l Po , B l o i I �P� o.leH�t *.° Is h Tim Carlon )M. lot ore" �aiS r00 �� BiRer it/rtt J w. lot fronto➢. 9a Ica Is 9a' .t 30' FSI) PI lc -- ---- : B !'!'➢B77 V Hn lot 40th 125' rr I ! / b=�' �\- • rsB =1 / Z~� � mt ac W aH.d ..r. for 23n a ry tma 1p cruor) amo f1c R/V to 6e vrcrtrd / •" yhI I 50' R �. - / (V front/roof rise. 10' ww 45' R. -C --�_ - . SP6• )a,K Ot' SHe ersr. Y omH7 rJ[ - Ex Edge Bit _ '�• /'4 I , ^•� _ _. ` _�` i -� 3 I? ao 3z stnet/crb tYT[ MHTM'i rnr 3.36 oe B y RP of wt. Slots I QL�1- V_�_ _—__ _fie _ _ _ •i _ $ Raro.. rx Wturtwus D.n.tty Uvits/oa. I (to rutty rocvD IM)) o-neav .lm rosem Av➢, Wt W.. 24X34 sr € ; (675 sr{; I _+�y~ W lau lot s:e 15.363I ur f31 a _ Ers�•1)W4 a 3031 �\ - �' iutvr cvD / Ip SS➢ 1\\.0�qr,� /�_. -�- (DY otMn)____---_` ruty° W RN ,s,GQ . I q ." ) 1 )\'`b. \ \ / • / ��• +b.36\ I $y�, �- Ex 4Y R/V jtt 8 QV [+• I' )�J l (p / ^114 1z,-R/V_�-- _Ex_Sw Ew 22=Ht- -1 _—_ ^a g•3�I'E K per' D 7 Ai 1054/ r—' rss: A% Z Y. I --T idiD�i �0 c ^ rutur, , ro-..t <.ntsrt" ai { a I (b, D...(cp.r) Abblett x. H E Ouse 0 RSB __-__-__-_ __ -_-I I ' L- /V i ro ae esi_ _____ I e, 3r ➢-➢ a o, zz.xl .r Isa63 If J a _. 1 .793 sr E.v. I u Ex. 1]utloq��yil e eyTiddiTon— irxrP C➢ from• CB 416. Ex. n.t t rer¢e Ex. cY f.rce mY oMrrq (bY otMrA ev (D otlxrrs) S.n H4 le 0y others) 105200/101)m NYd/GV othe 1066mnMB.50/1049.10 CB mY r> / 106p ock 1 ROPOS D PIN HURST C43 ts)— §y f.!R. es At pnent C 3 1 3 e thon Franz n H 9 -361-08 r Block 2 + 11 /04 Prelim. la 70 1(b — En r/ Westwoo P ofesslo at Service Inc. Chris Moehr P 952-937-515 \ {71 0 — �� 2 6 I 2 2 I SCANNED Z tr WN M . C4 a J LLJ V1 Z CLO, LLI -C Q UU F 11/22/04 2 I SCANNED i W LI Ex. House,,/ 71J 3' RIvorr xtbod bl Q y ' 1-3, 61 6464 Murray Hal Rd LLJ LU < Ex. House GV (by oth,rs) HYWW (by oi1wr L4. HI EHURST c : LLL Z 1 6414 Murray MI Rd 1 30 0 ]0 60 scut w r¢t rx u•4sa. �� I r.sLl u9 ft � g I Pleasant Hill W �I — _ — 416.90' _—__-----_---- „I 4P sl S aAJI Z? LO' Cos � o� —..�_•_� -'" tl l" 8 Ex. Lot 1, Block 1 Shlveley Add on Ex bpervow orae Lot I•B9» si (182X) ^ Ex. Ex. House Pool 1310 1 Tin Carlon GV Sa R -C _ _ ! IPIH v M Y B -C \ \ 3 Prep CB mY omrrf) 416.90 Block 1 Engr.i Westwood CMTs Moehrl 7 952-937-5150 0 2 L51 BI L4, 32 \ Molax'a /dditlpn Jackson Ex RN to be vacated EK. low it yy -- 10' tleor apoveqOd outd oil hytrontf. 0" m so -»t Ophts, Wes, shrupa, Xc<I Er gy, Brrft, coble Tv, 4aroiornrr bof», etc. My Co ctbrd to ex MM a CB rust M ere traled Son Se»r 8' PVC Solt35 Son Servke 6' PVC sMM Vet.m r PVC C-900 W~ $ervkr 1' ll p K copper N LI i 3' RIvorr xtbod bl ' LLJ LU < iencr GV (by oth,rs) HYWW (by oi1wr CB aly 0M ') EHURST (43 Lots) : LLL moa l tsional Services Inc. 1 2 L51 BI L4, 32 \ Molax'a /dditlpn Jackson Ex RN to be vacated EK. low it yy -- 10' tleor apoveqOd outd oil hytrontf. 0" m so -»t Ophts, Wes, shrupa, Xc<I Er gy, Brrft, coble Tv, 4aroiornrr bof», etc. My Co ctbrd to ex MM a CB rust M ere traled Son Se»r 8' PVC Solt35 Son Servke 6' PVC sMM Vet.m r PVC C-900 W~ $ervkr 1' ll p K copper N E a' o S na r=^ V i RIvorr xtbod Z L N t LLJ LU < ¢uh aF 0 Z o h W 3gN CQ om, S moa l n 4 LU SCM W QCW � 30 0 ]0 60 scut w r¢t c da L (tP �V ati� OtM��1 �' �w ►BIV Y�Y 1la�\ 1rY'!1 Mn lot ore° 15,000 ai Mn lot Ba 90' (<LL 1[ 9(y of 30' FSP PUBLIC depth Mn lot depth 12'3' Mox b Wtxv 25X rro.11 30• (nred ver. iw 257 [et a' o S na � RIvorr xtbod 30' 9» »ebod 10' <30' eomr> atsof. ��.. (v rront/rear »n IC fsw wu. O� 9de »u. Y peps y� ti stMrVnrb bItU. . MrM CUM IM) M fom b urxr tat' [-n s)--_-_-_-_ F~.W RN U. ------ ----------- -- --- ---- �s rvavv nRtvE Eno Prop. 8' VM of 10.40 ry cv —Trptwt tln rv, .1tr r»it5S00e' �ntw t" Z (by Drvtlaprr) Abblett Ex e»tr prNot) Irrce Sen MM 12 other) 1o66mnwa m4e.4a az6m 1 3 1 Mock 2 Z�Q t R, 2 `CANNED I\ y Ex.`House ° L a 1416— ` g 6f61 L] \BI f _i1 J c mel' wi R . Ex. H 64 a lash C] . rrpy Nu ed Ex. Stab E______booN„ J \\ _1066 t _______ __-_ 11 fYg9)b• -` � I \ �1a64 S Ft 1S/ I Pleasant Hill ,��I 416.90' ,. 4P------------ sl ------------------- ------------- u tI .r Baseline tree canopy over area OI (Per Surveyor 10/04) WI I U 1` Ex. House Bloc n Carlon ( 0� ri v C �°ti� o0 2 0 r w ppprrr s `S�• ------------- u tI .r Baseline tree canopy over area OI (Per Surveyor 10/04) WI I U 1` Ex. House Bloc n Carlon ( �-z Ex. House 9 BI L4, 02 V LS, ` ,y s —_ z \ Z MNM't Md<lan\ � N v S C7 of 0 TQ B1KIOrAy I a1LL1tAT1U1111, :Z total ate e. 336 oc. Bate1M cmopy covin m•o 239 pc OLTX of total ate) y O q / NO,... er rep 0.91 ec. (269% of total int) V 0 3 C.., area to be reraved 1.43.c Canopy car reaa remk*I, after Waal, a% e<. (2661 of total SM0 p C L1.i O C v a (cu� y ca er e Mn, q. *tl I35 ae (4M of total ate) / (per City table a 46X oP total ab) O AWKI*n.l ..my cover re "d 0.39 acv t2 • 0.71 ae. 3°.929 .f M 0 30 60 ls1 Ars oG c.wpy cover/lr . fpm City) 1089 tr/ere• / NO of tree. rfQW'ed 29 V., K•yE IN FEET ASSUME o.50' cROVN PIN. d TO GUI S� u as / gtiS F II nckson Ex. House y i v ' OItivar� We awrs,� ~Ew1Y » 11t1et1 B enov ex arty / He, Ipt front.,• 9P (N It 9e at W r$p FUBLIC eat to Lot 1. Vv ILt loo depen In, r ( r It tp. M 3V lm•d ver. ix n' N ro aocpte •x. 2Rx30' er eatbad w ! pXlRnat We tbam IC ( .1) Vet ate 0 IJL 'A re i/"ear .... Io' <erp. Foal utrucabn 4/ Side •px. Y 4nw cxxu. m<rt a ,alntah lNwuprrwt �Q2 aero fx Ex [dye B1t S E. IOd WvEnd prop. ttn.W. n (10-WAJ $� a0g R" n, ec tl t,. ut ,tat u � e. (restart Mel, SOlO cob IM) �{•j 13 1 iutir• curb On• (71' B -B) _Future SO' RN an• Z ` (by olMrO Ilii 0 6 )MRK32 Er. San Cz. zr tle. i AMI i (M'orv(op.ri" I y / s Abblett kl9/ E. W rut. SO' if/7lM rc Fief. strut cmeerlM (_i ce art( .pert) 1 -10" l — )Ck 1 ROPOS D PIN HURST C43 ts) 1 �wae— 3 owshares a anent C pf than Franz n 1/1� 94q'�( 1 -361-08li -1�'b. B�OCk 2 11 36 Prelim l : q En r.. Vesiwoo P ofe..lo al Service Inc. ¢ (04 — — Chris Moehr P �1 + R� 952-937-515 � o 6 2 / 1 2 set tl y staff "tart fr erotlon control notes. • T"xt nutt b rwwvd fron as r ctl (no bitMpl • Tea. aN teedlpANlrh reaJr d xiH 1 days after Ow 1.WQ It [ap•x. • ptY tenet xeea�p and aC1.D1eD b n9d (IF ...fury), • City repJ'H o de ,led MW route and trafFle cmtnl pm for "we" —tt,w (by 1 --cera CL d pz O N LLI W � z g s �a zZ RR39- W0 1-410 e+1 1�-2 UU KOC 11/22/04 04-108 .. 4 S-<-HryED ��cc..fWy� I ` �r 4 4 4 - �-z Ex. House 9 BI L4, 02 V LS, ` ,y s —_ z \ Z MNM't Md<lan\ � N v S C7 of 0 TQ B1KIOrAy I a1LL1tAT1U1111, :Z total ate e. 336 oc. Bate1M cmopy covin m•o 239 pc OLTX of total ate) y O q / NO,... er rep 0.91 ec. (269% of total int) V 0 3 C.., area to be reraved 1.43.c Canopy car reaa remk*I, after Waal, a% e<. (2661 of total SM0 p C L1.i O C v a (cu� y ca er e Mn, q. *tl I35 ae (4M of total ate) / (per City table a 46X oP total ab) O AWKI*n.l ..my cover re "d 0.39 acv t2 • 0.71 ae. 3°.929 .f M 0 30 60 ls1 Ars oG c.wpy cover/lr . fpm City) 1089 tr/ere• / NO of tree. rfQW'ed 29 V., K•yE IN FEET ASSUME o.50' cROVN PIN. d TO GUI S� u as / gtiS F II nckson Ex. House y i v ' OItivar� We awrs,� ~Ew1Y » 11t1et1 B enov ex arty / He, Ipt front.,• 9P (N It 9e at W r$p FUBLIC eat to Lot 1. Vv ILt loo depen In, r ( r It tp. M 3V lm•d ver. ix n' N ro aocpte •x. 2Rx30' er eatbad w ! pXlRnat We tbam IC ( .1) Vet ate 0 IJL 'A re i/"ear .... Io' <erp. Foal utrucabn 4/ Side •px. Y 4nw cxxu. m<rt a ,alntah lNwuprrwt �Q2 aero fx Ex [dye B1t S E. IOd WvEnd prop. ttn.W. n (10-WAJ $� a0g R" n, ec tl t,. ut ,tat u � e. (restart Mel, SOlO cob IM) �{•j 13 1 iutir• curb On• (71' B -B) _Future SO' RN an• Z ` (by olMrO Ilii 0 6 )MRK32 Er. San Cz. zr tle. i AMI i (M'orv(op.ri" I y / s Abblett kl9/ E. W rut. SO' if/7lM rc Fief. strut cmeerlM (_i ce art( .pert) 1 -10" l — )Ck 1 ROPOS D PIN HURST C43 ts) 1 �wae— 3 owshares a anent C pf than Franz n 1/1� 94q'�( 1 -361-08li -1�'b. B�OCk 2 11 36 Prelim l : q En r.. Vesiwoo P ofe..lo al Service Inc. ¢ (04 — — Chris Moehr P �1 + R� 952-937-515 � o 6 2 / 1 2 set tl y staff "tart fr erotlon control notes. • T"xt nutt b rwwvd fron as r ctl (no bitMpl • Tea. aN teedlpANlrh reaJr d xiH 1 days after Ow 1.WQ It [ap•x. • ptY tenet xeea�p and aC1.D1eD b n9d (IF ...fury), • City repJ'H o de ,led MW route and trafFle cmtnl pm for "we" —tt,w (by 1 --cera CL d pz O N LLI W � z g s �a zZ RR39- W0 1-410 e+1 1�-2 UU KOC 11/22/04 04-108 .. 4 S-<-HryED I E a 1 L3, BI Ex. House,,/]Pketisant \ 6464 Rvroy Hit Rd./ E%. HOUSP Block 2 - ': n q~ f t Jackson Z 41Mdray HII Rd ______.__tib ytP OSMSDDuI -mr ame BBIBb meted LMS Mn lot orro Mn lot franto0e 15,000 sf 9a (CLL IT 90' of 30' ESD) PUBLIC HII in, nz Mox Front •.tbatk 30' (n..d vor. for 251 S1� Rear utb.d 416.90' Sb IV (30' comer) —Cx RN to be v.cated �� tMeod .. <ae.. 10' d.I !d tnd .tr kd by MI Statute 19.44-IM Sid,Frovvo Sid, eau. Y eM Ront het K CMOI/DUF KW C= a". Um ---------- EM PraP •trcet/curb 2 BoW MI. SxverRkw guts de Hate BS 0 (MtY4P] 74 (to f, th o, «o rote nartb cub IM) (restore •ItA sorb A. Z�} E. fitl Ink fans. 11 2 3 5 to Ex. Lot 1, Block 1 Shiveley Addtlon to rEx klp.rvbw d, -to v Lot 1,119.0 if aezy] � o a n _a n Ex. Ex. House y W POO( D L O 1 J D` vP ITin Carton ms Eros_ DHS C4i I 5a R. R/vw D -C 43' R. 9-C w IMS m �_BHs BHS / `xx w \ VP Ex�50' R/v 3 � ®5� �4 B -D I Ex. Outlot A, Shiveley Addtlon 5 31' m>ooa•Dr•> (bya'Kwrs) 416.90 Ex wtot fent. Gv (by otHo'.) 1052.00/1011.00 HyWW (by other. CB my oth.r•) Block 1 PROPOSED PINEHURST (43 Lots) Plowshares Deve pnent LLC Nathan Franzen yg 952-361-0832 11/5/04 PreUm P1 io Engrg Westwood P ofesslonal Servlces Inc e Chris Moehrl P -4 7 952-937-5150 1 3� Wy 11 2 1-5, It 1 1-4, B2 moth 'f Addltbn 10)ailMBC32Ex. Son Ex. II' bit. \ _F_. Edg. T Tr" —_ �vevrc so• mv= -T.np, street »T Future etr.et c.ngrlM (by U .laps) Abb(ett htM fel! yord a •d ,=.d N addltbn to tht t'" Ibo.n e Ex. rw. Or4+acY hnc. V" 1 3 Block 2 q~ Jackson y PREL RY LANDSCAPE NaTESI ytP OSMSDDuI -mr ame BBIBb meted LMS Mn lot orro Mn lot franto0e 15,000 sf 9a (CLL IT 90' of 30' ESD) PUBLIC �V Mn lot deRth kp.ry . in, nz Mox Front •.tbatk 30' (n..d vor. for 251 S1� Rear utb.d 30' Sb IV (30' comer) —Cx RN to be v.cated �� tMeod .. <ae.. 10' d.I !d tnd .tr kd by MI Statute 19.44-IM Sid,Frovvo Sid, eau. Y eM Ront het K CMOI/DUF KW C= a". Um ---------- EM PraP •trcet/curb 2 BoW MI. SxverRkw guts de Hate BS 0 (MtY4P] 74 (to f, th o, «o rote nartb cub IM) (restore •ItA sorb Z�} - _Y_-_---_-_-_-_ futlr. Sb RN 0n. 10)ailMBC32Ex. Son Ex. II' bit. \ _F_. Edg. T Tr" —_ �vevrc so• mv= -T.np, street »T Future etr.et c.ngrlM (by U .laps) Abb(ett htM fel! yord a •d ,=.d N addltbn to tht t'" Ibo.n e Ex. rw. Or4+acY hnc. V" 1 3 Block 2 PREL RY LANDSCAPE NaTESI Na of rafts .11 tr..a lxoLL .d 29 ere.. (Por c.tM.VoH) Max. nu.ber o tretf/fpetls 1/3 of tot.1 as Dox: lays Wd s. d ovy) Is cl nn. CaNi.rors brow 4. r avpf P r!n I W f c.rttol r....ry .totlr u True[ tl)Yin d.I !d tnd .tr kd by MI Statute 19.44-IM eM Ront het K CMOI/DUF KW C= a". Um Cots do(IPD)w Dtro . w 9 Cot Wm Spruc. .• gnB.rs COS 10 r BD 9, BB 2 BoW MI. SxverRkw guts de Hate BS 0 r BB 1 Z a W a ZZ J r a Z X Oe CL a 0 N Z Z S 11/22/04 04-108 RR1 xa 5 `fro �I 'O� Terra RECEIVED EnglneerinM Inc. 0" OCT 2 6 2006 ONEn melt CITY OFCHANHASSEN DATE: (o/ 1-2 (PC.FILE: TRANSMITTAL TO: 3.-H S; (A: r- RE: G�v..- C 4 a.. kms,..` C".. We are sending you Attached Under separate cover via The following items: COPIES DATE NO. DDESCRIPTT'ION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: For your approval or your information For your review & comment REMARKS: TOIL a r1- I PW mill 3 FU COPY TO: Y31Lai, BY: re ENCLOSED: As requested TRANS. ONLY 6001 Glenwood Avenue • Minneapolis. Minnesota 55422 • 763 593 9325 • Fax: 763 512 0717 i coi 4iJ y LANDSCAPE NOT: No. of replocen ent t, e< Mu. number of trees/_, Mir. % of con f -r s Dr,.iduous tree Sze C,nnifercus tree si e Trees -,hull be 'r^rn defined and thr- Plont Fey--, 4"t CC?MMONJ /8OTP Iti tttes f r- N a CJ CJ to to to co Y to p + t th > CZ }{ Q U_ p L7 p N s Ln m c 'p C n m + ca rn toN tC� o c m W 3 i 1. .� Wk— � 4 -a I y 1 3 LLJ �z FL) x� -� 0- LJ 1 ,✓ � 1 i coi 4iJ y LANDSCAPE NOT: No. of replocen ent t, e< Mu. number of trees/_, Mir. % of con f -r s Dr,.iduous tree Sze C,nnifercus tree si e Trees -,hull be 'r^rn defined and thr- Plont Fey--, 4"t CC?MMONJ /8OTP Iti tttes f r- N a CJ CJ to to to co Y to p + t th > CZ }{ Q U_ p L7 p N s Ln m c 'p C n m + ca rn toN tC� o c m W 3 i 1. .� Wk— i coi 4iJ y LANDSCAPE NOT: No. of replocen ent t, e< Mu. number of trees/_, Mir. % of con f -r s Dr,.iduous tree Sze C,nnifercus tree si e Trees -,hull be 'r^rn defined and thr- Plont Fey--, 4"t CC?MMONJ /8OTP Iti tttes f r- N a CJ CJ to to to co Y to p + t th > CZ }{ Q U_ p L7 p N s Ln m c 'p C n m + ca rn toN tC� o c m W 3 1. .� Wk— � 4 i coi 4iJ y LANDSCAPE NOT: No. of replocen ent t, e< Mu. number of trees/_, Mir. % of con f -r s Dr,.iduous tree Sze C,nnifercus tree si e Trees -,hull be 'r^rn defined and thr- Plont Fey--, 4"t CC?MMONJ /8OTP Iti tttes f r- N a CJ CJ to to to co Y to p + t th > CZ }{ Q U_ p L7 p N s Ln m c 'p C n m + ca rn toN tC� o c m W 3 Wk— � 4 -a I y 1 i coi 4iJ y LANDSCAPE NOT: No. of replocen ent t, e< Mu. number of trees/_, Mir. % of con f -r s Dr,.iduous tree Sze C,nnifercus tree si e Trees -,hull be 'r^rn defined and thr- Plont Fey--, 4"t CC?MMONJ /8OTP Iti tttes f r- N a CJ CJ to to to co Y to p + t th > CZ }{ Q U_ p L7 p N s Ln m c 'p C n m + ca rn toN tC� o c m W 3 � 4 -a I y 1 I VX C-�BU LLJI?j� "I'! 2 D C) __j N% qA9 (BY OTHERS, PRIVATE.) zliv 0 C (FIELD VERIN FINAL LOC. -:t ND LEV.) Tim Larkin /Jackson M AIA ,,(VERIFY Et&VATION Ex. House 13 0 Ex.1 058.2 AB -IELD WITHO�ENGINEE8- GAR -1067.8 N I Popl, Re..X -F 1058,5 & -QEVELOPE�) VERIFY HOME ELEVATIONS R2 --110 (JAte VO -3.4 AB -') -.1, V, �% lz -- -1 9 --j I\ ---w: i— JRPUP1.6 1061- T? A R15 05&65 1 R15 (D J'Al C vir T" jct4 '-T ?15 4 Cs a 80 PVC CUL R T A US (BY DE vgoiM S 0 0 J4 113 T A 0) E(jL R -A SB -3 106 .96 SIN 0z X. 100 IAJ :TY 64.41 c mo GRAVE TO I'7T 106,5 N 06 .0 U66 TMEW D�ab tj :4A 10515-007 06 'W6 ,tea (JVD S SB— Oct- lo Ll Q0 5 '10 T A sr AB-TOP14Cla F 0 ' T�AIO B — I j 106D. i f AD U, 5 aw) 1070.8. Fr Tlw0 le alkout '--7 ---, lgyp, iu C) AID 07 Ar 60. 0 te A .0 A I to .:I C6 A Jl.6 10 7.0 AS - I : O to �A!O W 0 T411 ( fl� - 11 -) I C'q .0 ;'-TkPf3P14 OPI '.APcP2U V -7� lir 11 . 10' ' v. •10 1 ODC4 A;% - tp.v 0 + 6— 'JF Ex. rnQtal fence Prop. B 43 x hi pr' Prop. C13 416.'9 0 G RW="L r m I I I IL� 'w 1051.20 1��BY OTHERS FENCE 9, - 0t,\0 /4-0-4-6 T' (by others 43 A S -16-5-� � �0,, 105 ',,,GR/�DING UM 4� 1nA7 1-7 rNn ItnA Q 0--7 IT LINE ry L, �- � � i � r ,'? � � `� �� © 2005 TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. Rd. CB) CDC -0 +10 �S EX. BERM X x 6 W W � /7 �S s 416.90' �n � Q9 N � �I C, CD \ o \ CD CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR: CRESTVIEW CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR: LECY BROS. HOMES Le � 1066.3 �° o Pleasant Hill Q) I �' U . I X 230.37 263,71 139.16 19.38 — — Q Ease. - 79,16 , — 30 RSB — Ex. Lot 1, Block 1 Shiveley Addtion - (48,818 sf original) U , (6154 sf) 4 W o �O' _ ^ o o J I � 18,606 sf � 1� 3 � \ \ I s �vs� Tim to £ r Q in Ex. 6 se s u 10 rJ Q \ w P^^ GAR_ ; 1067.8 M1 QD' LLJ VERIFY HOME ELEVATIONS ° i C) o % — — — 25' FS °tee 65,84 �VARIq B ��°�°°� Jackson Moline's Addition LOCATION MAP Ex. R/W to be vacated. (763) 315-6300 w - 50' R. R/W Q I \ �O 45 R. B -C(5612 sf> 70, asp Ex.Edge Bit. z I �1 ee- a O x I I 6.8%� \ o Ex. 100 R/W w L I I LIG T 0 —I— —- I I 5 1 010' SSB o��m cn mI O Q� o �� mZ IC) oI � 0z `�° w �I ,'\ CD Ln � of I o 30' R. B-0 5 Sdwk. N \ FUTURE CURB LINE \ 31,10 3S' 2 �� (31' B—B) (BY OTHERS) o Future 50' R/W line �701 'sse 5 R" B — _ — Ex_ 40 R/W m o S� I I 706g_E_ Ed e Bit. W DRIVE 5+12.02? CRESTVIE S1A: -V,2119 ----------- U W E J QW z� QWO I s m�U L � LL -1 I zZElf w�0 Ex. 6'chain link fence 30 RSB 22,311 sf L 121.81 Prop. CB 43 (by others) i 1051.20oho 1047.47 � II I (VERIFY PRIOR TO a: - CONSTRUCTION) CONSTRUCTION) �v LLJ:-�F o \,� \ QD L 20 Ex�an. 7{'— Ex. 40 R/W Gar. 1066.0 G , �yQ m / mI I� g 0, 3 1070.83/1055.32 Future street centerline lal Walkout o�l� I `\ �Q�ko 0' ° ' 30 o S 30 60 I ut 4 END PROP. STREET/CURB Future 50 R/W line CD Bsmt. mW I � OW STA: 2+57.29 W ' X067. C/;z � B -B STREET SIGN & STOP SIG SCALE N FEET N I cc I �� W Q (BY DEVELOPER) Bsmt. 1058.0 �l I �'Q � Abblett E' --� I I cn Y X STOP 30' RSB ------- I o ow / 15,403 sf U n1 cn 16,406 sf 10' Ease. _ Ln R1-1 (30"X30") Ex�uTl A veT-e-1C -7--cn - 117,00 - n + 12$.09 metal fe ce w Ex. white privacy fence Prop. CB43A 416.90 GV, Hyd/GV SAN MH ITTB Y OTHERS (BY OTHERS) BY OTHERS) 1 1066.00/1048.50/1048.40 (17.60' BUILD) 1052.50/1048.27 , VERIFY PRIOR T CO` � (VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) (VERIFY PRIOR ION TO 1 CONSTRUCTION) I IIIo'� II I PROPOSEq PINEHURST (43 Lots) Z\ » PROP GRADE @ PL (30+00.00 CL PL) 47 LF 18" Plowshares Development LLC �� --1066.0 (PER PINEHURST PLANS) U DEVELOPER / BUILDER LECY BROS. HOMES ROY LECY G 15012 HIGHWAY 7 _ V MINNETONKA, MN 55345 ' (952) 944-9499 CITY OF z CHANHASSEN CIVIL ENGINEER 43E6<�IIVf�D -A, - PETER KNAEBLE, PE APR 18 2005 r� MATT PAVEK, EIT < TERRA ENGINEERING ENGINEERING DEPT. w (763-593-9325) SURVEYOR Ex, House DAVE CROOK, RLS DEMARS-GABRIEL SURVEYORS (763) 559-0908 SOIL ENGINEER Uj STS CONSULTANTS LTD. MERV MINDESS Ex. R/W to be vacated. (763) 315-6300 w - 50' R. R/W Q I \ �O 45 R. B -C(5612 sf> 70, asp Ex.Edge Bit. z I �1 ee- a O x I I 6.8%� \ o Ex. 100 R/W w L I I LIG T 0 —I— —- I I 5 1 010' SSB o��m cn mI O Q� o �� mZ IC) oI � 0z `�° w �I ,'\ CD Ln � of I o 30' R. B-0 5 Sdwk. N \ FUTURE CURB LINE \ 31,10 3S' 2 �� (31' B—B) (BY OTHERS) o Future 50' R/W line �701 'sse 5 R" B — _ — Ex_ 40 R/W m o S� I I 706g_E_ Ed e Bit. W DRIVE 5+12.02? CRESTVIE S1A: -V,2119 ----------- U W E J QW z� QWO I s m�U L � LL -1 I zZElf w�0 Ex. 6'chain link fence 30 RSB 22,311 sf L 121.81 Prop. CB 43 (by others) i 1051.20oho 1047.47 � II I (VERIFY PRIOR TO a: - CONSTRUCTION) CONSTRUCTION) �v LLJ:-�F o \,� \ QD L 20 Ex�an. 7{'— Ex. 40 R/W Gar. 1066.0 G , �yQ m / mI I� g 0, 3 1070.83/1055.32 Future street centerline lal Walkout o�l� I `\ �Q�ko 0' ° ' 30 o S 30 60 I ut 4 END PROP. STREET/CURB Future 50 R/W line CD Bsmt. mW I � OW STA: 2+57.29 W ' X067. C/;z � B -B STREET SIGN & STOP SIG SCALE N FEET N I cc I �� W Q (BY DEVELOPER) Bsmt. 1058.0 �l I �'Q � Abblett E' --� I I cn Y X STOP 30' RSB ------- I o ow / 15,403 sf U n1 cn 16,406 sf 10' Ease. _ Ln R1-1 (30"X30") Ex�uTl A veT-e-1C -7--cn - 117,00 - n + 12$.09 metal fe ce w Ex. white privacy fence Prop. CB43A 416.90 GV, Hyd/GV SAN MH ITTB Y OTHERS (BY OTHERS) BY OTHERS) 1 1066.00/1048.50/1048.40 (17.60' BUILD) 1052.50/1048.27 , VERIFY PRIOR T CO` � (VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) (VERIFY PRIOR ION TO 1 CONSTRUCTION) I IIIo'� II I PROPOSEq PINEHURST (43 Lots) Z\ » PROP GRADE @ PL (30+00.00 CL PL) 47 LF 18" Plowshares Development LLC �� --1066.0 (PER PINEHURST PLANS) U _ V tA z w >� Q - Z �z Uj 6 (� rn o) ILLI— o _� � DESIGNED P.J.K./M.R.P. I DRAWN M.R.P. CHECKED P.J.K. Q r2 z LdO 0 I— M It 00 t O z 61 Q) Cr CLw a C Y � N d � ti � W x a DATE 4/7/05 PROJECT NO. RCP CL5 Nathan F anzen 952-361-0832 �� (VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) WARNING Q4-108 @ 1.70% 11/5/04 relim. Plat R t � � ,� , � / THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR Engr:: Westwood Professional LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, SHEET NO Services In�. _ �� Block 1 7 � � Block 2 � PIPES, MANHOLE, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES Chris Moeh I PE �, BEFORE DIGGING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE 952-9�7150 ` \ ��`\\ / THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. © 2005 TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. A X. H 11s x 1072.6> > �' p \ L B1 � � t 6 64 M\6\r\ray\Hill Rd.> \ S- Ex House l I , Ex. House_, '0\ \Ex. o1--0-7– 1 �R�P � \0, L B1 \ L5, B1 L4, B2 �, a - Ex.St M y 647.4- Mu Hill Rd. \ l 1 U' - Swa! frorn Mummy Hill d y 4�( \ Rd. C 1066.3 c,. 6 \^ --2066-� J � � � - \ � \"\ \�1�� S \. �/ . \e U � � ^ •rp — — — I +` 6 �° Pleasant Hill --- --- �\ —1064 6� E=g�RAA `' �� Moline's Addirory - -- —1062 LJ W rocs — S \ 416.9 0'rv- Sex CO Pe - LO OPId`T 12 / N - \ 1064U,. - W 23\0.3 H16 BV@.Ti)BW2-12/14 �� "\ J I ;•-f T B20 {1 -�._ i r A Y18V1nk I .. ! L 1 AO -/ (7 '� -- --- - Wr1`2rl/eME / Jl ,� �€Ye; C. ._j !.ip e 5 ( " i 7� R25 \\ , 29 O �T A22 (`TRA10 139.16 25 [- RCy/2q B T jO �M1a \`S�POP12 ,..y o t 1�POP12 A I ,R�. R // ^mac ff 10 \ \ (".TRPOP10 .T�¢A114 f �._' 9'12 Yd T P14 25 / \ ' �€j �A8 . Ex, o -C1 Block 1 Shivele Addtion \J ( Ia'•'/y ( 7AE8 m / A30 t —' \ 4 �'� / i /T 2pb A1�6,5 T PoPlo _--- r�2€B,TRBW12 `� % ` v �4T n > r l-irY 1- R f �1 b b TA Rc�'•-16 O ti A €e _ '(48,18 sf or �� .T Ek4w10�.T�tA14 fi fJ..�%(7.,r> R�±le l' R20 U 16 0– ---- -- —.. - _ \ �ritPlB'8 � 7ACW10 \ ^ v � //" � '� T4 \AT BLKW12 \� I I (jJ / i R18� _�'� l i, TAB �v O I � SA T �T� 3 ' Tim Larkin T 3R20 I 0 /.T AIO T F14 U1 �` ; 7 R20 'J a c k s o n \ /T I Ex. House / I \ O �.i�A14 1 T BLKW �_ / T A8 AS v \ X I v 1 EX.I GAR. -1067.8 7 T R3- U `TgBLKWl2 ,7 Al2 W ° Po l VERIFY HOME /f R2- (!) �= (.i As 0 `r�Ala '.rl{As 7 A�B �L:j ELEVATIONS I T� R20 I J / A8 058—/T�u O! T A16 ' T� R2 2 T Al2 20 \- BR20 �.. T�A R3-18 ��TAR15 / (` )PIP16 � �� 10 \ \ \\ I ` 1068.66 `'} .TR 15 LIL1 T AID (�T AID ��BC20 (.T�Al2 ,.. \ / ,7pA XI_ -C -J C 2-10/TRA14 )AS\ \ \ \\ .\ p° i ``7�A T Al2 \/_�JJI/� •J -1A 7>�a�A10 \ / // /:ToP14 f�.T�AMLB C.T. Al2 \ \ t�T�jAB /7 A2-8 \ ' I TAR -20 \ J �T AB LIA3-72 T \• T A R-20 W \, "- / ; z A14 .Tk AS �A1 LI� ,.,\, t —�` �\ `. o T A R,1-20 z :, C, W Jr .k j 1 ,o h C14 AkO v� -\ { .�8A14 S 14O ; \ / y /}}- 1rn S�j ?25 /- C7TAR 5 " �! / T A10 ` .T�A10 \ t/ G-.. �Y E2 �'_��' /7R, a'-2 i T �( .� �` bJ / E2 i� I (T 0 RB 25 i r�T 12 Htl'CT ARH2-25 ('T'aA R-25 �T A10 !-' T A10` \ \ ?\.�k". ,*E4 \ '1 -/ ; T�^o\Q10 I ��_`_jABR3 5 C T�fi R $ 22 ��{4s \ (7�HIC14 \ �rJ,ry °"f 80 RRA)1�7-29 \ %.ijA RD -20 / ~. \\ �Y (?'8 \� Ab �-. 1—�]— EX, \� �, n '- Pbb: T ABR25 A10 \� 8 Ti{AIO \ !E�:` EG.. �. T \ 1 A10 l �✓ \ \ \ T POP12 \ f^ 1 � AZ '! _ T C16 FTi�POP� i 7 8T�A% O f �S4 9 e < $ ro 5' I AS <� ` J OT A4 107 I T 14 \� T 8 �F FIpB/2-10 �, \. _� \ 0 LI 6H T (• `.f \/ I T A8 �0 i T'�1814 �l _ T E2 _ TijHIC14 ( T ID \`� /7 Al2 `\�•T�POPI4^ (T AIO' T �� T A10 P C��•�� / l• O A �T Al/ N C�A14 / _ POP18 \ \\\ IryAB \ ._�FPA12,\ \� \ a- j ` \_ �\ i -�1/ (/s�1l,Ni¢�p14 / •�• 8\- \ �,r to J TaA10 — L 8 A Al2 T BT� ( �jA T A8 \./ `0 / Jami > ��POP10 TRPOPB C T�AIO \� - t/SAAB / \\�/E/8 ` Al2/8 I �.T-LT / ! ( �T WW34 a I ` T EB �j'' ✓✓� m ; .T AB !!''�� _ { \ ! .iryni0/8 \ Q (�j�A2-12 ;-7A 0• i HIC14 \'' V I I �7�A10 T�AlOV A. (�T l'�iT A3� a�As VJ •� 4 _ . I (T Ai4 / \'�T A30 A8 �TIjAl2 T A30 8,T A14 \ �.� •p� ,� \- \ /T�jAB 1�r.7A/Al2 t�A14 ��8 (T�{AB \ •� � r la o T A10 \ (T AS T 12 , J G rT 4 TAB JA8 a T A10 Z \ �3 yT El0 �\ ' I ,r�14 'S4 r .T^aloes TAio ""�� ,� `7�Alo `7'1A a7\T As QCT Al0��' 4 1•` \\ ��• ff O� t T PIB'12 \..•Fa �- (T A10 0 ,�,TIIA/o '�.. �T do 3,I ry�B Q �/ t7�A14/ /T 14 �� (T T A2 8 A30 -Jt 1 A10 (-T'�A10 (TpA30 l `A�A10 �•itlAB \\ f \ T�AlU.", A8 �J ITflol414 �� 4 Tf�AB/30 `-Ce- rT� \J(3�11 J ` {."fA8 — -- _ Ex. cha in_l inkaa Jake TJq TA18 ! l� `, ' \ (�ij€10 Cl i O X t •'�HIC8 16 (�i.T A14�y-8 1, I Il 1 ,nom / !�, �-"� ^AB j •'7A14.T A10 h�A10 ��OP12 ` �; I P' /FV�L c� N (l -I I' e•4! / T PO 4 ; 7 A10 I (.T P16 i, / QO'�b AI0 Algl 8 1 .�gPOP14` P /- .J j !'f'.iRP6 �p`C �j (T A +] AID T Al2 \ 1`ti �--- -J \ ( .T P14 IJ (.i{POP20 ('T,o�1ThPOpI6% �Y .T�POP2-16 /�T '�P¢236POP16 �`eT�POP16 /.,` �, {•7APOP P18 �4 9 \J (� EX. \ Utlot A, Shivele kddtiort� A bl iAp j, a face \ 416 0 20 E�. R/W to be vacated. / i f1p12 _ Ex. E e 0. 8 X157 10>2 63 Ex. 100' R/V :1 5 rr 5 W Ex. 40' R/W 101.7 f r1_ -- k Ex. 22' bit. °4j Ex. Edge B -i.— — — I CRESTVIEW DRIVE Ex. 40' R/W Ex.- -an. IVI - TM 1070.83/1055.32" i� Abblett \ EX' House >> N Ex. whit -e --privacy _fence 1 70_ \ s O t 1 W N E 30 0 30 60 11 6=www=IIIl - WARNINGSCALE IN FEET THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLE, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. U V C I L 3 Q O 0 Z Ljj OO z d 0) G LU LU O 0 O Z Q� N a rn V Of 0 0-0 N J W T O 00-5 d Q 6- 'vV) s 0) —7 Lr' W Lu O w Q >,3 E o4) o 0 DESIGNED P.J.K./MAP. DRAWN M.R.P. CHECKED P.J.K. T DATE 4/7/05 PROJECT NO. 04-108 SHEET NO. 2 V C I L Go O 0 0 C O 0 Ljj OO z d 0) G Z O 0 O O « 3 N -0 O N 0 Of 0 0-0 N LJ T O 00-5 d O-" Ld 'vV) y d i C C LO O 0) _ C U to 7 C Y O w Q >,3 E o4) o 0 i U 0 o -a C 4 0 0 L , WU) a o T DATE 4/7/05 PROJECT NO. 04-108 SHEET NO. 2 I L O V) Ljj z z O z z z O U 3: Ld 'vV) Z > _ V) w Q W U U T DATE 4/7/05 PROJECT NO. 04-108 SHEET NO. 2 D 2005 TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. X 230.37 — 52.73 139.16 1p' Ease. Ex. Lot 1, Block 1 Shiveley Addtion \ (48,818 sf original) 1 4 o 105 0 ° \ \ STA -0+89\ 3 >< w 8X6 RUCER 6" GV HYDRAN Ex, GAR.=1067.8 Pool VERIFY HOME ELEVATIONS C STA=0+67 CS=1063.0 INV=1053.0 trees, shrubs, Xcel v cable TV, transformer boxes, etc.) CS=1067.0 INV=1057.0 to ex. MH or CB must be core drilled. Ej0 C w z � In, _ ----- - e STA=0+93 w CS -1063.0 " I INV=1052.5 / \ / STA=0+84 CS 1063 0 45 1_ 8X8 TEE \ (2) 8' C X068 INV=1053.0 w 1058 V I o 4 W `` J 0 O Ex. 6'chain link fence I N ^I �"o L — / 10' FOAP. V Yr'�) LIGHTI e Ex. R/W to be vacated —Ex. Edge Bit_ _ ` I E 100' R/W 8X6 TEE E 6 GV HYD. e� x w If[TIL11-1�--i iiZ�, FUTURE 8" WM Ez.4Z1—b �Ex.Edge Bit. f�5 MEW DF?IVE Ex. 40' R/ Ern. 1070.83/1055.32 END PROP 8" WATERMAIN 0 STA 2+68 W/ 8" GV Abblett 5+12.02 UTILITY NOTES: 10' clear space reqd. around all hydrants. (ie: no street lights, trees, shrubs, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV, transformer boxes, etc.) Any connections to ex. MH or CB must be core drilled. Ej0 C w z San. Sewer 8" PVC SDR26 San. Service 6" PVC SDR26 Watermain 8" PVC C-900 Water Service 1" Type K copper Z U 4 Q 00 0 O C 44 w O { O Ej0 C w z Eo0o Q) Z «a�co o ° o_J— w Lim �° D Lij W 6� ° V O 7 Y >,E E v C O _ L � W -� ,� C C IN O QJ rn I ni, � X I QW V) W o -s �z 5: Q DESIGNED P.J.K./M.R.P. I DRAWN M.RP, CHECKED P.J.K. z It Q 00 0 O C L C C 00 L O { O Ej0 C w z Eo0o w «a�co o ° o_J— w Lim �° D w N N p N d z V O 7 Y >,E E 3 E ° owo � _ L � i L L n -0O �O C C IN ° w z Q Q r w < LL, w z z0 � QCL Co w w V) w<wV) �z 5: Q _ �Q C/)z �J wQ QQ- ry_ U U J Z Q�/•� U W n V J 4 DATE 4/7/05 PROJECT ND. 04-108 SHEET ND. 3 2005 TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. w 230.37 — — �— 0 13816 10' Ease. I �� NOTES' V \� 3 —� Ex. Lot 1, Block 1 Shiveley Addtion �� ALL CURB RADII TO BE 66-18, WITH 10' TRANSITION � \ — \ (48,818 sf original) TO SURMOUNTABLE (SEE DETAIL) (D V �e�� SEE GRADING PLAN FOR CUL—DE—SAC GRADES AND V \ t� ADDITIONAL SPOT ELEVATIONS, NOTE: ALL SPOT ��j p 0 1°sq —2}m `' Brim Larkin �� ELEVATIONS DENOTE GUTTER GRADE UNLESS z (v C \ �I Jackson (U 105 0 n Ex. Ex. House OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. GAR.=1067.8 U u 0 u Fool VERIFY HOME II °��`� ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5 UNLESS OTHERWISE W �Ui Q. ELEVATIONS 1 , , J o' _ INDICATEDW L a \ ( Z Q INSTALL DRAINTILE 25' IN EITHER DIRECTION FROM ff�n a -_j J CB'S (SEE DETAIL) V I Ex. R/W to be vacated. O 5 R. R/W \ \�0, I CURB INLET SEDIMENT FILTERS SHALL BE INSTALLED Z O Ul N Y o 5 R. B—C E° I Ex_EdQe Bit_ 1° IMMEDIATELY AFTER CURB IS COMPLETE. THEY SHALL w �� 0) Qui se. ° a� } __ . Ex. 100' R/W BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE SITE HAS BEEN FULLY 0� w w LIG T ---8 -- =W —} e 5 Z MH G J o STABALIZED. (SEE DETAIL) �y 0) Z IZoD&i1 v R. B- f/ n 2 n� m "a te c,� �r� o LO Q� Ln 3 r! C w �� FUTURE CURB LINE a ALL SIGNAGE TO BE INSTALLED BY CITY I W e.— (31' B—B) (BY OTHERS)o O _ Future 50' R W line `n ALL UTILITY WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W 10' \ Ex. 40 R W m 0 THE CITY'S 2005 STANDARD SPECIFICATION AND V 00 �o "1 �£�e. R. e—C (( MH1 °' l �3 _ _ DETAIL PLATES. w c� N Fe e. I h i�F VTM x.4TL`b T — — 5 0w °o- K I 1069 II °° �Ex. Ed e Bit. 5+12.02 a0 K) p dor °or / 0 ,�ZTA: V�il.s p' CREST�Ew 4DRIOVE W — — — — ``� STORM SEWER STRUCTURE SCHEDULE �J aww I Gar. 1066.0 G I II Ern IS SIZE CASTING wZo 6° ale / $p. 3 1070.83/1055.32 Future street centerline �w� 3 sSS 0� / Walkout wa�kOut 0' ° END PROP. STREET CURB Future 50' R W line CB1 48 R -3290—L qY F- / h esry�t 0W 6 STA: 2+57.29 STREET/ / CB2 48 R-434 zzzo!: �w I `� X061. I o B B STREET SIGN & STOP SIGN °F w 10 w a (BY DEVELOPER) �r Ex. 6'chain link fence ti°� IL B—stemtr„. T10„58.0a I Abblett 00 \ X 30") N lR1-1 (3010' Ease.5] 1 © 2005 TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. J f Ex. HHvgs� x 1072.6 \ 1 f 6 64 fv9u`rray Hill Rd. - /� Ex. House marc - I \Ex�1-O-7'-1�" - R \.. \ L5, B1 L4, E •- x \ S m 0.9-% ` •� \� + Ex. Sw - / \ 67_4 MurrayHill Rd. \ �� a( fro Murray Hill ons' `�-� ,`\'675>�C�)-', 11066.3 - - o ° + .` �-'--E_-x $E�q ji, c� Pleasant Hill M 1064- --- -_ X �6 \ - - -1062-` t j L,� 4� 416.90 7 Q) _ k CC) \ �9 �` CCC r B Pt T f. z / �� o X N "los, LLJ 2NO,37 �a ;ti A16 / \ ---/ Mt$. DW Q T w� 12/14 � ' 1 .Ti4�l; __ -��^�/ � r.1�j61%,ft�E�.i 6 •`.._:-1. - 3 6 `-kWill' �� 1 `ACW24 `•T r`�P0P12 �/ dQ ; TgFOP12 � 1' ; T1j R Q �T14A22 i^ A10 I t .,��y� 16 •'T�M14 --'� o T A14 ./ r/ 9lQ'H'L'to R ✓\ W ! j ,1' ❑P10 d h, / wia P M4il�t}3✓o CD .T E8 _ •` hAH ( Ti 206' :7 gP0Pta Efl , � Ala T R / Ex. ot-1, Block 1 Shivele Addtion " � yld .. r- 3 Y Y, !`�" ; �,�' �(�8( 18 sf original) e"T Rpt$ %`,T�YAB Chi �' �� i T K4 U P7�Pj/h J 1 i ry R POPS Curio z��o- GRADING LIMIT '/ x , /. :gHLKWi2 -SiLTFENCE a f' o Z5 a -j ir621 3 Tim Larkin O / '\ r:T �T,AIO /:, iP o1 •\� L(J c Ex. House O �HLjfW 1 o As /`\-= cP • C? EX,� _ T�A14 � ., L \ X GAR.- 1067.8 ' O , HLKW12 ! 40 T Al o� w � Po�l VERIFY HOME cn TlaAs T ° o Q� 10 nnqq", ELEVATIONS 05 , ''.T(�'T=C2/�..II {(_Tj A1e. 4� -".✓�POPI6; OhVT. �C�� OO ��7 i8 J• 162 V \ ( (/() ar / L�1J // T io iaAe �Aio r : cz^o\� � 1 ` z-Io/TRA7a 06215 >`"(C00 /NA^ 7 C) T.I2 f.r i �. Ay t4ryYA QR UES o I o "A P1 Ai Qrlye a) � gAio D •� ` r� l:T•Ae P \ 9512 / LLJ r \ I r ., Z 0 j'� jpae\ A66 V 1p63 \ CC 1 V G T Ala � • � .TWA14 10 F 0 AID 102. 0 62 ` 1056 .TRAi. O�f�'T A T L ,O �oQ� Cj0 ` 37 \I •• Al �� (TgAtO ,D O 0- l 054 oj� ,` 6� w r a 2 LL_ i TRA14 ' T _ a %O �q 4 o O L O I j 7 PGPi8 r TyIAe8 Q _J '\ d\o iO s . 1' ``..J6�gA POPgmjW 6 .( �ZO (0--(`1A \ O `7/wl Ee cl�i (Tr -TA's (TpA10 rT12 ioi'alkaut R 1063.96 \, ��'�t VECt 1 °� \ 64.4 6 064.0 , 7265,8 106�j. 1065.3 j r, T Pf1P20 \ S 7'' -1) A14 \_. 066' �g rTBt 106 9,- 23 723 . r T E4 `1 6 T LIH 1068 s 2DE TO DIA �I r a TREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONS: P.J.K./M.R'P. DRAWN 73-1a area 3site 6 ac. - --•-•-•- DENOTES Baseline canopy cover area 2.39 ac. 71.1% of total site) Non -canopy cover area 0.97 ac. (28.9% of total site) Canopy area to be removed 1.43 ac. -8" W- DENOTES (to grading limit shown) X 1056 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION X 1056 Canopy cover area remaining after grading 0.96 ac. (28.6% of total site) (to grading limit shown) i W Q Min. canopy cover required 1.55 ac. (46.0% of total site) (per City table @ 46% of total site) y 0" I Q) W Additional canopy cover required 0.59 ac. x 1.2 = 0.71 ac. = 30,928 sf Area of canopy cover/tree (per City) 1089 sf/tree Z No. of landscape trees required 29 trees 00W AS \ t-16 M / ago/Jackson REMOVE EXISTING DRIVE ACCESS TO o LOT 1 /, \off RELOCATE 2 EXISTING GRADING NOTES: * See City staff report for erosion control notes. * Trees must be removed from site or chipped (no burning) * Temp. site seeding/mulch required within 14 days after site grading is complete. * Daily street sweeping and scraping is reqd. (if necessary). * City requires a detailed haul route and traffic control plan for importing material (by Contractor). * See detail sheet for standard grading notes and SWPPP BENCHMARK RIM OF EXISTING MANHOLE 11 LOCATED AT ENTRANCE TO PROJECT ON CRESTVIEW DRIVE. ELEVATION=1070.86 LEGEND: P.J.K./M.R'P. DRAWN B-5 DENOTES SOIL BORING - --•-•-•- DENOTES SILT FENCE/GRADING LIMIT -1056-- -- DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS 1056 DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS -»-»- DENOTES STORM SEWER -> >- DENOTES SANITARY SEWER -8" W- DENOTES WATERMAIN X 1056 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION X 1056 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION EOF 4m 1059.0 DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION U P.J.K./M.R'P. DRAWN ? CHECKED P.J.K. 3 w Q �Q� Z 0 Uj W j� Q_ w z a (Z v ' � i W Q o F- Q�J 0\ i QQi y 0" I Q) W W o _s � N DESIGNED P.J.K./M.R'P. DRAWN M.R.P. I CHECKED P.J.K. fl �` ENTRAff��CE MONUMENTS (VERIFI� WITH DEVELOPER) It 00 /_E /W t be vacated. ?75' TEMP ROCK CONSTRUCTION C 0,2 ENTRANCE (MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT a o� o Z r E E Bi . CONSTRUCTION - SEE DETAIL) Q 3 41 of a x. 100'REMOV EX. BIT (TOao FUTURE NORTH CURB LINE) 2 (RESTORE WITH SOD) o T£ � I o O 5 TTT 0 O S �"�,+• y N C Q) a X L>J I\': .N MATCH l -L=._ Ex. 40' R/W - ��5- `�, 7 070.4' - X. Edge P. - - - - 5+12.02 Gla µ TqA14 - CRESTVIEW DRIVE - %.T�A70 � 010. y' ' Ex�an. l I; iTR'u0 1070.83/1055.32" ?)SAI \ 1 y�• �" / \ .,\ I_tJ �i�PCPT?�^ 1 "749\ a7 .T A `T `A70 4A .. 4Z \ ' :,.1. - 1�pEi1El Z ' jL Y' S8 7.X4AIOC.1 1/ O�� LLJ z O ; P17P14 " Al �0 \ ,� T Ala._- } I / • r-ePv _ ci '\ :r�AlO a.. 1 A T� o � � / tr- ,�� ;-i ° 060.0 �gAe I < \ TgA14/' A- � J vim( ` ,TRAi 14 ! T I • \ . T A7. { • ,'T`,AiU� A .TA ' c- _ Ex...�chaitzIink _f;�e J "\ p8 ro� ;� 4 , A8,10 BsA-ITS o� gAla( L to �( q � � Abblett � Ex' Hou, � I ('.T�Ala i \ r T a I - o . • - �.T I1IL8 (,l -RIS x �j• �• \ . _1, Q� 2 T ¢. ,,,) / �"� \ % r- t •'AA8 `J %T Aia AIO I q _ •,.c."''tcn� .... - . - . 1 pp •.c' _ �,/--- T •0 l .T} POP •T�P (4 �� I I l T tRF;bPl6 t�TZtPCP76� �O - '�y `p I '�TkP❑ �.../ � I � �� R 1-1 (30> JX 3 ))) �i 1 ;` TRA..i rynl� t✓' T1�PMPi4 T�POP20 �... POP `./ .y. T P°f to;t( �iPC STS 1 OP78 CT�A� Ata (=Atz = / fix.\�u'tlot A, Shivele k-ddtior�=,ygQFl Ce kA. b o _ W l -✓ T 0P2-16 pb --�° - `\' �, I \ Ex. vrit�- ivac fence ' P ron�s. CCB 43 i 416 9�0 G - - -1 _ J a Prop. C 43A SILT FEND GV, Hya/GV A MH 1�BY 0TH N'_-) - \ (by others i (BY 0TH RS) BY OTI-f. RS) u \y� 6 .00/1048.50/1048.40 (17.6' BUILD) U W o 1051.20 1 �5 ��o 1052.50/1\048.27105 \GR DING L MIT LINE VERIFYRIOR 1° Y -,PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTI��N 1047.47/ coax \ �� ,( �_>o__ S DATE x (VERIFY PRTR TO QONSTRUSTION) C'\ -\ \ VERIFY�PRIOR TO � xONSTRUCT✓N) was \ �` �1�\ 30 0 30 60 4/7/05 ,,,� © 3 A PROPO E PINEHU T (43 Lo?S) PROP GRADE @ PL (30+00.00 CL PL) \ CONSTRUCTION) 47 LF 18" Plowsh�a �s Development LL I I ��1'' =1066.0 (ftR PINEHURST PLANS) WARNING SCALE IN FEET PROJECT No �_ __j RCP �L5 Nathan] FAanzen 952-361-0332 ! �� \ (VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC 04-108 @ 1.710% i 11/5/04 relim. Flat / __ ____ __ _- _.-_ __ UTILITIES FOR LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND �O �;\ Engr:: VVes�twood �Professioncl r ,, ,, 1 / WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLE, SHEET NO, \ ` 8 �o I Servicesi Ind. � � �� i / VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE V1 s� Block 2 c„m _ \ Block 1 7 Chris Mqq'�eh I PE �\� DIGGING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR 5 \�\ 1 952-9":�,l 50 ; \ \ �� \\ / / CONSTRUCTIONREPLACE THE ATNOWCOST HEN DAMAGED THE OWNER L Z Q Q �Q� 0 wiz w z USO z Q o F- Q�> � Z � 00W W U W � UZ� W Q ZOI �_ C:) Cn w fn Z LJ_- Q. Q. Or, E CD w �-- U U h Prop. C 43A SILT FEND GV, Hya/GV A MH 1�BY 0TH N'_-) - \ (by others i (BY 0TH RS) BY OTI-f. RS) u \y� 6 .00/1048.50/1048.40 (17.6' BUILD) U W o 1051.20 1 �5 ��o 1052.50/1\048.27105 \GR DING L MIT LINE VERIFYRIOR 1° Y -,PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTI��N 1047.47/ coax \ �� ,( �_>o__ S DATE x (VERIFY PRTR TO QONSTRUSTION) C'\ -\ \ VERIFY�PRIOR TO � xONSTRUCT✓N) was \ �` �1�\ 30 0 30 60 4/7/05 ,,,� © 3 A PROPO E PINEHU T (43 Lo?S) PROP GRADE @ PL (30+00.00 CL PL) \ CONSTRUCTION) 47 LF 18" Plowsh�a �s Development LL I I ��1'' =1066.0 (ftR PINEHURST PLANS) WARNING SCALE IN FEET PROJECT No �_ __j RCP �L5 Nathan] FAanzen 952-361-0332 ! �� \ (VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC 04-108 @ 1.710% i 11/5/04 relim. Flat / __ ____ __ _- _.-_ __ UTILITIES FOR LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND �O �;\ Engr:: VVes�twood �Professioncl r ,, ,, 1 / WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLE, SHEET NO, \ ` 8 �o I Servicesi Ind. � � �� i / VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE V1 s� Block 2 c„m _ \ Block 1 7 Chris Mqq'�eh I PE �\� DIGGING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR 5 \�\ 1 952-9":�,l 50 ; \ \ �� \\ / / CONSTRUCTIONREPLACE THE ATNOWCOST HEN DAMAGED THE OWNER L 2005 TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. Ex. House x 1072.6 II L3, B1 6464 Murray Hill Rd. I� CIL Q \ �k 1071.3 0� Ex. Ex. 107'-15" RCP 1 LHouse N Storm 0.9% + + EX' Swat (from Murray Hill X06 \\,(,-1066.3 6474 Murray Hill Rd, Rd. CB) �� C) I X 1066.3 `0 + 6+ EX BERM S�° o Pleasant Hill � I L 17s 416.90' Q0co �9 N \ \ O A22 of CD \ \ O :r�PCPta .. HLAi971D \ \ POPS ; Iii CW10 J O O r r(tA14 i sLK ,I �P40 C, 12 f TIjSLKWSZ (� -AB ,, l T �AiD U tLi a T A8 Q 14– Al2 C I.T�POP16 ) \ UCr 230. / -•- T BW2-12!14 ' RFli6 BW, 6 AC �% LI \_J i .T4PPIP12.. a 00r TRHW't2 • 5L \, , _� T�HE10 P ^ 6 -T CH 39 .1 ''4?kCW2a ? TIePCPiz �.T�M14 � � ro � Z s L5, \ W W a; Ln CS \ N�� Ln QZ ° ? A T'AID AIA Ex. Lot 1, Block 1 Shiveley Addtion E6 `%y a 'a-� '-' ¢�)C.. \ W i Q Q1 0 Q d C N M 0. �� C w VJ �Y U a ELKWI2 O .11 AB p Q q � 3 ? Tim Larkin fT Al0 T11•F14 Q Ui Ex. House 105(3vo ;`_ AB Ex, Al o w Pool GAR.= 1067.8 VERIFY HOME rT rT�aa � ELEVATIONS C ,T@EC20 �� CG 112 " -Tl B T�q�q� I IC �T�A10 ;'.T"SCPl w r3T AW `i ;� !l lr{Al2 " T}PAB / / Q ' T�PCP14 .TC.A1Q z OLLJ X / / z w A14 !• TIjA1f Z: W AF AID l—m o z f TSF; \I_11 \� TRAI4 -?�A8 T (Z l O �J <w� w O Q O �LL- C) LLl �� LL]J O Ex. 6'chain link fence -- 111T P6Pi8 ' �gA1D AIP W 230. / -•- T BW2-12!14 ' RFli6 BW, 6 AC �% LI \_J i .T4PPIP12.. a 00r TRHW't2 • 5L \, , _� T�HE10 P ^ 6 -T CH 39 .1 ''4?kCW2a ? TIePCPiz �.T�M14 � � ro y !' T PuPL 1..� -:Tt�A10 1 r 1'-J _ ! ,j.N \-Q� J Flo / -/ W14��"o.� (ti?,�PCP14 �• ��g10f- � Tt�A10 Aa ,' N�� ;-�A w1z ° ? A T'AID AIA Ex. Lot 1, Block 1 Shiveley Addtion E6 `%y a 'a-� '-' ¢�)C.. 4r tr`ti 1 (48,818 sf original) �Y U a ELKWI2 O .11 AB p Q q � 3 ? Tim Larkin fT Al0 T11•F14 Q Ui Ex. House 105(3vo ;`_ AB Ex, Al o w Pool GAR.= 1067.8 VERIFY HOME rT rT�aa � ELEVATIONS C ,T@EC20 �� CG 112 " -Tl B T�q�q� I IC �T�A10 ;'.T"SCPl w r3T AW `i ;� !l lr{Al2 " T}PAB / / Q ' T�PCP14 .TC.A1Q z OLLJ X / / z w A14 !• TIjA1f Z: W AF AID l—m o z f TSF; \I_11 \� TRAI4 -?�A8 T (Z l O �J <w� w O Q O �LL- C) LLl �� LL]J O Ex. 6'chain link fence -- 111T P6Pi8 ' �gA1D AIP 'RAID J rTT _e 6 AC .i AS \--• LI SCALE 00r T�AID Cti0 AtD l•�( %Ae /'.AAS GS w (-T 2) (`TgNICS (7T, A 1 _ 1 ^T1A14.•T A8 // v c JA8 -.i�AA\t46^. A10 C.T AI2 {� ' Prop. CB 43 by others) 10 1047.472 0 /1005 I� (VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) eco QL- 8 o ,- WP WP 2 P `T111 /Y{ AID 1 T�E2 \.J A14 m HS BHS WP TAA14 \_! TF4 H LI m J / 1 % A10 / .TNAB T&A!0 -1 (_J \yJ�A1��AID r ' .i AID �PCP72 q \ b m•`_ q r.T�PCP -T�PCP24 `T T PIG YPCP16 0 �_ /,T P.I'y � e \_. f PQP14 tT PJP20 \_, c .1 RP f�1PCP16 Ex. �utlot A, Shivele dtiorj ice " P 16 `--P�PIS a Prop. CB43A 416.90 GV, Hyd/GV (BY OTHERS) BY OTHERS) 1052.50/1048.27 , (VERIFY PRIOR T( 00 - x CONSTRU VERIFY PRIOR IION)TO I CONSTRUCTION) © PROPOSEq PINEHURST (43 Lots) 47 LF 18" Plowshars Development LLC RCP CL5 Nathan F. an7en 952-361-0832 @ 1.70% 11/5/04 prelim. Plat Engr:: Westwood Professional � Block 1 7 Services Ind. Chris Moen I PE 00 952-9� 150 t S I Jackson Ex. R/W to be vacated. _Ex_E�qe Bit. 57 Ex. 100' R/W w I� PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE NOTES: No. of replacement trees required 29 trees (per calculation) Max. number of trees/species 1/3 of total Min. % of conifers 20% Deciduous tree size 2.5 ci avg.; 1.5 ci min. Coniferous tree size 7' avg.; 6' min. Trees shall be from certified nursery stock as defined and controlled by MN Statute 18.44-18.61, the Plant Pest Act. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME CODE QTY. White Pine/Pinus strobus WP 9 Colorado Green Spruce/Picea pungens CGS 10 Black Hills Spruce/Picea glauca densata BHS 10 Min. two o story in the front ya in additio he Ex. 40' R/W X. >os > '4j _Ex. Edge Bit. CRESTVIEW DRIVE _ _ 5+12.02 Ex. 40 R/W Ex -man. EQ 1070.(93/1055.32 Abblett E hit W i lot, shown. WLO 2 O a DESIGNED P.J.K✓MR.P. I DRAWN M.R.P. CHECKED P.J.K. r i� J W ! ,TE�A10 N' AID ("T'5 PROP GRADE @ PL (30+00.00 CL PL) —1066.0 (PER PINEHURST PLANS) SCALE 00r A1C t.` `iAS I C O O - 04-108 �" ' I��CP74 SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES 0-T A14 fJ T A10 �;�ijPCPl4 �• ��g10f- � Tt�A10 Aa ,' N�� \,_� C T�PCP12 "!8 r TA14/7Rk8. i1 ( T AS4 N" -T�A10 A8f10 ,'-.T AS `��T f�1S GS w (-T 2) (`TgNICS (7T, A 1 _ 1 ^T1A14.•T A8 // v c JA8 -.i�AA\t46^. A10 C.T AI2 {� ' Prop. CB 43 by others) 10 1047.472 0 /1005 I� (VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) eco QL- 8 o ,- WP WP 2 P `T111 /Y{ AID 1 T�E2 \.J A14 m HS BHS WP TAA14 \_! TF4 H LI m J / 1 % A10 / .TNAB T&A!0 -1 (_J \yJ�A1��AID r ' .i AID �PCP72 q \ b m•`_ q r.T�PCP -T�PCP24 `T T PIG YPCP16 0 �_ /,T P.I'y � e \_. f PQP14 tT PJP20 \_, c .1 RP f�1PCP16 Ex. �utlot A, Shivele dtiorj ice " P 16 `--P�PIS a Prop. CB43A 416.90 GV, Hyd/GV (BY OTHERS) BY OTHERS) 1052.50/1048.27 , (VERIFY PRIOR T( 00 - x CONSTRU VERIFY PRIOR IION)TO I CONSTRUCTION) © PROPOSEq PINEHURST (43 Lots) 47 LF 18" Plowshars Development LLC RCP CL5 Nathan F. an7en 952-361-0832 @ 1.70% 11/5/04 prelim. Plat Engr:: Westwood Professional � Block 1 7 Services Ind. Chris Moen I PE 00 952-9� 150 t S I Jackson Ex. R/W to be vacated. _Ex_E�qe Bit. 57 Ex. 100' R/W w I� PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE NOTES: No. of replacement trees required 29 trees (per calculation) Max. number of trees/species 1/3 of total Min. % of conifers 20% Deciduous tree size 2.5 ci avg.; 1.5 ci min. Coniferous tree size 7' avg.; 6' min. Trees shall be from certified nursery stock as defined and controlled by MN Statute 18.44-18.61, the Plant Pest Act. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME CODE QTY. White Pine/Pinus strobus WP 9 Colorado Green Spruce/Picea pungens CGS 10 Black Hills Spruce/Picea glauca densata BHS 10 Min. two o story in the front ya in additio he Ex. 40' R/W X. >os > '4j _Ex. Edge Bit. CRESTVIEW DRIVE _ _ 5+12.02 Ex. 40 R/W Ex -man. EQ 1070.(93/1055.32 Abblett E hit W i lot, shown. WLO 2 O a DESIGNED P.J.K✓MR.P. I DRAWN M.R.P. CHECKED P.J.K. E J U U x. w I e privacy fence SAN MH 12 TBY OTHERS \ 1066.00/1048.50/1048.40 (17.60' BUILD) (VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) I 30 0 S 30 60 J W o Q DATE 4/7/05 PROP GRADE @ PL (30+00.00 CL PL) —1066.0 (PER PINEHURST PLANS) SCALE 00 O U PROJECT NO I C O O - 04-108 O ' a=o 46 SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES O z E O D O z \ LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, Block 2 MANHOLE, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING N�� SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE 6, .,�.+ DAMAGED DURING K 0-2 W L('� d C N �W C/) 0. �� C w VJ Q > 3 E o w 0 o n 0 V / L N O .+ 01 y i i- < Lw/ LL Z y C L C y O E J U U x. w I e privacy fence SAN MH 12 TBY OTHERS \ 1066.00/1048.50/1048.40 (17.60' BUILD) (VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) I 30 0 S 30 60 J W o Q DATE 4/7/05 PROP GRADE @ PL (30+00.00 CL PL) —1066.0 (PER PINEHURST PLANS) SCALE 0 PROJECT NO (VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) WARNING 04-108 1 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES z z \ LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, Block 2 MANHOLE, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE CzC G DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. /'Q a_ L('� L.A. �W C/) Q w VJ Q n 0 V / L z Q < Lw/ LL Z E J U U x. w I e privacy fence SAN MH 12 TBY OTHERS \ 1066.00/1048.50/1048.40 (17.60' BUILD) (VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) I 30 0 S 30 60 J W o Q DATE 4/7/05 PROP GRADE @ PL (30+00.00 CL PL) —1066.0 (PER PINEHURST PLANS) SCALE IN FEET PROJECT NO (VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION) WARNING 04-108 1 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR SHEET NO. \ LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, Block 2 MANHOLE, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2005 TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. PL CL PL 30' 1 30' 15.5' to Back 15.5' to Back Wear Course to be 1/2" e Above Edge of Gutter v �°Q 1 1 1 i 3.0% 2.0% 4" Topsoil, Seed `N & Mulch or Sod. Surmountable Concrete Curb �I I--� 1.5 : 1 1 1/2"-MNDOT 2350 LVWE35030B Tack Coat - 2357 2"-MNDOT 2350 LVNW35030B 12" -Class 5 Aggregate Base, 100% Crushed 24" MNDOT 3149.28 Select Granular Borrow (See Note 7) NOTES 1. Right -of -Way Required - 60'. 2. Maximum street grade 7.0%. 3. Minimum street grade 0.75%. 4. 4.0" Topsoil placed in disturbed areas. 5. 2 Rolls sod behind curb. 6. The bituminous wearing surface shall be placed the next construction season following placement of the bituminous base. 7. A test roll of the prepared subgrade shall be performed by the owner in the presence of a city inspector. The city has the authority to require additional subgrade correction based on the test roll. CITY OF TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL STREET CHANHASSEN STREET SECTION REV105 D: 2-97 , 2-01 , 1-03 DATE: 2-97 7 PLATE NO.: 5200 FILE NAME: W3S2M_ y Note: Silt fence per MNDOT specifications, source 2000, machine sliced woven monofilament, 36"wide fastened steel T -Posts with 3(501b) tens strength plastic zip ties per T -Post. (Machine sliced) 6ina� x�ng EROSION CONTROL FENCE - TYPE 1 T Posts 24" in ground Ties 'Min. Depth of silt fence embedment. Note: Type 2 silt fence is the same as type I with hay bales installed as per detail. Type 2 to be used to protect all wetlands. Zip Ties EROSION CONTROL FENCE - TYPE 2 Hay or Straw Bales Two wood stakes Niven thmgb bale 1.5 to 20' into the grwnd Dates to be recessed 6' below grade. Bales are to be tied with a non -Degradable Material. CITY OF CHANHASSEN REVISED: 2-97, 1-02, 1-03,1-04 DATE: 2-97 PLATE NO.: SILT FENCE 5300 30' SETBACK (MIN.) 5' OVERSIZING (TYP.) / C IU:7 MIN - �1ELEVATION AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN S! \ 711 Z4" TOPSOIL COMPACTED STRUCTURAL BACKFILL 5' OVERSIZING (TYP.) OqF+* \� D (PER SOILS ENGINEER) CONTRACTOR TO EXCAVATE SOIL MATERIAL AS REQUIRED BY SOILS ENGINEER. TOP OF STABLE SUBSOIL (PER SOILS * THE FRONT HOLD DOWN FOR EACH UNIT TYPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS RAMBLER 1.5' LOOKOUT 1.5' WALKOUT 1.5' ON RAMBLER (NON WALKOUT) UNITS, THE FRONT HOLD DOWN SHALL EXTEND FROM FRONT OF THE BUILDING PAD TO 20' BEYOND THE REAR LIMIT OF THE BUILDING PAD. ** OR SLOPE AS REQUIRED BY SOILS ENGINEER *** RAMBLER A+B+C=60 LOOKOUT A=35 B=5 C=20 WALKOUT A=35 B=8 C=17 NOTE: 1. THE HEIGHT SEPARATION BETWEEN THE GARAGE FLOOR AND THE BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION IS APPROXIMATELY 7.5 FEET, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. THE EXPOSED OPENING AT THE REAR OF THE HOME IS APPROXIMATELY 0.5 FEET ABOVE THE FINISHED GROUND GRADE AT THE REAR OF THE HOUSE. 2. THE DESIGNATED HOLD DOWN SHALL BE COMPLETED ACROSS THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE LOT (SIDE LOTLINE TO SIDE LOTLINE) 3. FOR SINGLE FAMILY APPLICATIONS, SOIL CORRECTION FOR EACH BUILDING PAD SHALL AT A MINIMUM BE COMPLETED THE FULL WIDTH OF THE LOT (SIDE LOT LINE TO SIDE LOT LINE) ON CORNER LOTS, SOIL CORRECTION FOR EACH BUILDING PAD SHALL BE COMPLETED ALONG BOTH SIDES OF THE LOT TO ALLOW HOME TO BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG ENTIRE FRONTAGE. TYPICAL BUILDING PAD GRADING DETAIL 60' BUILDING PAD (TYP.) A*** B*** C*** FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR (RONT) ELEVA ION S SHOWN ON GRADING (AIF r -GRADING CONTRACTORLTO)GRADE TO, THIS ELEVATION FRONT HOLD DOWN* \slO� 4" TOPSOIL �F 10' MINIMUM GRADING BEYOND 10' (SEE GRADING PLAN) 20'-30' MINIMUM USABLE REAR YARD DESIRED. (i.e. 2% TO 10% GRADES) 0.0' RAMBLER 5.0' LOOKOUT 8.0' WALKOUT FILTER FABRIC " 6" MINIMUM DEPTH 1" - 2" WASHED ROCK 18" MINIMUM CUT OFF BERM TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE 20 �p NOTE: FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK. CITY OF CHANHASSEN :D: 1-98 DATE: 2-97 IAM E: 383 -Mi ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PLATE NO.: 5301 SITE GRADING NOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED GRADE. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG PROPOSEDC STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) REQUIREMENTS: THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN `; CURB DENOTE GUTTER GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. -14 00 6 D Z THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE TYPICALLY AS EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS FOLLOWS: ALL SLOPES ARE TO BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ONIt UTIUTY COMPANIES AND WHERE POSSIBLE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE 1, INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ' ^ INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON TO BE EXACT OR COMPLETE. 2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE v THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT ALL APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 3. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL 7 1 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT 4. CONSTRUCT SEDIMENT BASIN / POND SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES 5. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE Z S WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE 6. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL Cr. S CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES BY CONTACTING GOPHER 7. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE 1 1W O STATE ONE CALL (800-252-1166) PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS. 8. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES �� PERMITS 9. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES Uj � THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT START WORK UNTIL ALL NECESSARY HAVE BEEN 10. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S FOR DRAINAGE) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT MAY HAVE TURBID OBTAINED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 11, INSTALL STREET SECTION Z Q THESE PERMITS. 12. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY 13. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS � THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS 14. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH �� I DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. ANY TO ADJACENT 15. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND .� Z THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES 16. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND TE SITE IS STABILIZED, U) PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. W M REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. DISCHARGE POINTS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SCOUR. THE SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED O CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTOR INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION S SHEATHING OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. ADEQUATE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGE WATER THAT AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) CONTAINS SUSPENDED SOLIDS. CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE UMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTORS ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATED AUGUST 1, 2003 # „�I O M PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE MNRl00001 PAGES 1-26) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. \0 v PROPER OPERATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES. THE THE SITE WORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE DEVELOPER'S / CITY'S THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING A COPY OF THIS SWPPP CONTRACTOR SHALL AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED OR LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT'S SPECIFICATION, WHICH EVER IS THE MOST STRINGENT. THE (NARRATIVE, PLANS AND SPECS) ON SITE AT ALL TIMES OF CONSTRUCTION AS WELL z STABILIZATION MEASURES ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE z CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A RAINFALL OF 0.5 INCHES OR SITE CONSTRUCTION SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL AS COPIES OF APPLICABLE PERMITS AND INSPECTION REPORTS. _ CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. REPORT. ~ BASED ON INSPECTION RESULTS THE CONTRACTOR MAY MODIFY THE SWPPP IN L1J z ORDER TO PREVENT POLLUTANTS FROM LEAVING THE SITE VIA STORM WATER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL: W INSPECTION UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE TERMS OF THE PERMIT, LEGAL, _ 3: (n REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL C/-) INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE KEPT ON FILE BY THE CONTRACTOR AS AN INTEGRAL \ Q PART OF THE SWPPP FOR AT LEAST 3 YEARS FROM THE DATE OF COMPLETION OF I COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION OF THE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE I- Q U) z POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT: FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION INCLUDING IyJ ry = MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON THE SITE; Q 0 U W ENGINEER. ALL SOILS CERTIFICATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE OWNER AND ENGINEER SOLID WASTE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND iz OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH ti DURING AND UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S); ROCK w p ti a HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: OIL, GASOLINE, PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES CHECK DAMS, ROCK ENTRANCES AND/OR SILT FENCES SHOWN ON THE GRADING AND DATE SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS 4/7/05 PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON EROSION CONTROL PLAN. EROSION CONTROL SHALL COMMENCE WITH SITE GRADING EXTERNAL WASHING OF TRUCKS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE PROJECT NO. LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND THE STREET SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE 04-108 FINALSTABILIZATION: THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE ACCORDING THE SHEET NO. TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE CITY AND DEVELOPER'S SOILS ENGINEER OWNER. THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALL DESIGN AND MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (N.O.T.) WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE OR ANOTHER OWNER/CONTRACTOR HAS ASSUMED SHALL BE PRESENT DURING THE TEST ROLL. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. STABILIZATION. DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER MAY, AT HIS/HER OPTION, DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR IN HIS/HER THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY STREET AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE DEPOSITING OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. SEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AND AFFECTED AREAS CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING ALL TRAFFIC CONTRACTOR. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FLAGMEN TURF IS ESTABLISHED. y AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC z CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF �- TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY AFTER FINAL GRADE IS ESTABLISHED IN ANY PARTICULAR AREA. SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL AFTER THE SITE GRADING IS COMPLETED, IF EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE NOT WAIT UNTIL ALL GRADING IS COMPLETED ON THE ENTIRE SITE. a CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND REGULATING AGENCIES INVOLVED. THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH FLAGS, DESIGNED P,JK./M.R.P. STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE ETC. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. NO TREES OR SHRUBS ARE TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE DRAWN M.R.P. OWNER. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY - EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES CHECKED P.J.K. SALVAGED MATERIALS TO BECOME PROPERTY OF THE OWNER. TYPE OF SLOPE MAX TIME UNSEEDED WITHOUT ACTIVELY BEING WORKED TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION PONDS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH THE THAN 7 DAYS INITIAL GRADING THE SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED FROM THESE PONDS AS NECESSARY,STEEPER i a a J 4, W L1 PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. TO 3 FLA FLATTER THH AN 14 DAYS 10:1 21 DAYS POTENTIAL DISCHARGE ARE STABILIZED ` N 00 6 D a Z c 3 ae 0 TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL AND CAN ALL SLOPES ARE TO BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ONIt ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR W a1 0 " � 0 0 L TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SILT OR CLAY OR THESE PLANS. GULLIES, SLOPE LENGTHS CANNOT BE GREATER THAN 75 FEET. ORGANIC MATERIALS ARE EXEMPT.w 0 0 0 w o tn.`-0-0c o DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING: v1 3 SEDIMENT TRAP AS MANUFACTURED BY WIMCO,LLC.SHAKOPEE, MN. SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS DESIGN LOADS - AISC MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION. 9TH EDITION. ALLOWABLE AXLE WEIGHT LOAD - AWS STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE - STEEL, D1.1-94. SAFETY FACTOR - 29 CFR 1926 - OSHA SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS WATER FLOW RATE (THROUGH TYPE FF FILTER) MAXIMUM OVERFLOW RATE MODEL#CG23 NOTE: Clean filter media after each rain event and replace if filter is clogged with sediment. Remove debris/sediment from receptacle after each rain event. CITY OF CATCH BASIN CHANHASSEN SEDIMENT TRAP REVISED: DATE: 1-04 PLATE NO.: 5302A FILE NAMF:393_5302A ALL STORM DRAINS AND INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES OF n E o 0 o POTENTIAL DISCHARGE ARE STABILIZED ` N 6 D a Z c 3 ae 0 TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL AND CAN o v 8.2 NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. W a1 0 " � 0 TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SILT OR CLAY OR a. � 0 ORGANIC MATERIALS ARE EXEMPT.w U 0 tn.`-0-0c o DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING: v1 3 c Y DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS a 3 E o N 0 FOR DRAINAGE) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT MAY HAVE TURBID 0, o a`i, c °� y u OR SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A TEMPORARY OR m 0 =' o 0 o PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF - ' wU' 0- o THE WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER, DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS OR WETLANDS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE POINTS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SCOUR. THE DISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIPRAP, SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SHEATHING OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES. ADEQUATE SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGE WATER THAT CONTAINS SUSPENDED SOLIDS. Q INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE O THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE AT ALL TIMES FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROPER OPERATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES. THE LLI CONTRACTOR SHALL AT A MINIMUM, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL z STABILIZATION MEASURES ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE z CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A RAINFALL OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER UNTIL LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. THEREAFTER THE _ CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. ~ BASED ON INSPECTION RESULTS THE CONTRACTOR MAY MODIFY THE SWPPP IN L1J z ORDER TO PREVENT POLLUTANTS FROM LEAVING THE SITE VIA STORM WATER W RUNOFF. THIS MODIFICATION MUST BE MADE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OF THE W INSPECTION UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE TERMS OF THE PERMIT, LEGAL, _ 3: (n REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. LJJCn C/-) INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE KEPT ON FILE BY THE CONTRACTOR AS AN INTEGRAL \ Q PART OF THE SWPPP FOR AT LEAST 3 YEARS FROM THE DATE OF COMPLETION OF I = THIS PROJECT. I- Q U) z POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT: LL1 Q THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING POLLUTION PREVENTION IyJ ry = MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON THE SITE; Q 0 U W SOLID WASTE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND iz OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH ti MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPGA) DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. w p ti a HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: OIL, GASOLINE, PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT DATE SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS 4/7/05 WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. EXTERNAL WASHING OF TRUCKS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE PROJECT NO. LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTEWATER PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. 04-108 FINALSTABILIZATION: THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE ACCORDING THE SHEET NO. DEFINITIONS IN THE NPDES GENERAL PERMIT PART IV SECTION G. THE CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (N.O.T.) WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE OR ANOTHER OWNER/CONTRACTOR HAS ASSUMED CONTROL OVER ALL AREAS OF THE SITE THAT HAVE NOT UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION. © 2005 TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. .I =1 - I r = o Bc I-1' Use MNDOT 3149.2A N� 6< o I� Granular Borrow 0 i 7 o M o N U d � The bottom of the trench shall be shaped to fit the pipe barrel for at least 50% of the outside diameter Dia+12" Min. "Dia" Denotes outside diameter of pipe NOTES: 1. When existing soil conditions are not acceptable for backfill and/or compaction in the pipe zone, pipe bedding and backfill shall be used as shown above. 2. A soils engineer will be required to determine the depth of the pipe foundation embedment material if needed. Pipe foundation material shall be accordance with MNDOT 3149.2H course filter aggregate. CITY OF PIPE BEDDING CHANHASSEN IN POOR SOILS II REVISED: 1-98M _98 DATE: 2-97 PLATE NO.: 2201 FILE NAME:VX=11 CL Variable PL 0 a Wye Plugged End - - 1/8 Bend 6" PVC SDR -26 Pipe Min. Slope 1/4" Per Foot aN m 2"x2" Marker L1/2 Pipe Diameter Min. See Note 2. Sanitary Sewer Gravity Main SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL Services to be Used in Conjunction with Plastic Pipe Sewer Main for Depths of Cover with Less Than 16 Feet. NOTES: 1. Solvent Weld all Joints. (Non Gasketed) 2. When Sanitary Sewer Service is not Accompanied by a Water Service in the Some Trench, Install a 6' Heavy Metal Fence Post Next to 2 x 2 Marker and Paint Top 6" of Post Florescent Green. 3. Cleanout Required on Private Property if Distance from Main to House Exceeds 90 Feet. 4. All pipe shall be bedded on granular borrow 314A or course filter aggregate (3149H). z 6 CITY OF TYPICAL SANITARY CHANHASSEN SEWER SERVICE :D: 2-99.1-04 DATE:2-97 PLATE NO.: 2001 TAME: i Street PL Variable 6' METAL FENCE POST DENOTING CURB BOX. TOP 6" PAINTED BLUE. CURB BOX WITH 1 1/4" STANDPIPE AND STATIONARY ROD. z M Water Service Ln � �1"X1" Corporation Cock ` 1" Type "K" Copper Concrete Block Support Water Main NOTES: 1. DO NOT PLUG END OF CURB STOP. 2. THE USE OF PIGTAILS ARE NOT PERMITTED. 3. THE COPPER SERVICE LINE BETWEEN THE MAIN LINE AND CURB BOX SHALL BE ONE CONTINUOUS PIECE. SPLICES WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 4. CORPORATION COCK TO BE 1"X1" INSIDE DIAMETER. 5. SADDLE REQUIRED ON 6" DIP OR SMALLER MAIN. 6. SADDLES WHEN REQUIRED SHALL BE FORD STYLE F202 DOUBLE STRAP. 7. STAINLESS STEEL SADDLES REQUIRED ON ALL PVC WATERMAIN. CITY OF TYPICAL WATER CHANHASSEN SERVICE REVISED: 1 -J8 DATE: 2_^ PLATE No.: 1005 FILE NAME: 1006 y CL awiiwiy . UVTZr NOTES: 1. Solvent Weld all Joints. (Non Gasketed) 2. When Sanitary Sewer Service is not Accompanied by a Water Service in the Same Trench, Install a 6' Heavy Metal Fence Post Next to 2 x 2 Marker and Paint Top 6" of Post Florescent Green. 3. The Use of Bends Shall be Restricted to the Two Shown on This Detail. 4. Cleanout Required on Private Property if Distance from Main to House Exceeds 90 Feet. CITY OF SANITARY SERVICE CHANHASSEN THAN (GREATER DEEPR REVISED: 2-97, 1- -03,1-04 DATE 2-97 PLATE NO.. 2002 FILE NAME: Shape of back of buttress may vary as long as poured against firm undisturbed earth. Dimension C1,C2,C3 should be large enough to make angle 0 equal to or larger than #5`. Dimension A1,A2,A3 should be as large as possible without interfering with MJ bolts. 9 = 45' Minimum. Place polyethylene between concrete & pipe. All bends & fittings shall be restrained with Megalugs thrust restraints or equal 9 - See no BUTTRESS DIMENSIONS PIPE 22 1/2' BEND 45° BEND 90° BEND/TEE SIZEr'- D1 B2 D2 63 D3 6' „ 1 -5" 1 5" „ 1 -5 2'-1" „ 1 -68" C� " 1' 5" 2' 1" V-6" 2'-8" 2'-0" 12" 0" 1'-10" 3'-4" 2' 0" 4'-9" 2' 616" °m 0" 2'-0" 3'-10" 3'-0" 6' 2" 3'-6" 20" " 2'-8" 5'-6' 3' 4" 8'-4" 4'-0" 24" 4'-4" 3' 0" 6'-10" 3'-10' 9' 8" 5' 0" 30" - - 9'-3" 6'-0" 17'-0' 6'-0" PLAN 90' BENDS ICONCRETE SHAL IN CONTACT WI1 THIS QUADRANT OF PIPE SECTION A -A PLAN 45' BENDS A - See --'- " , PLAN 22 1/2' BENDS CITY OF CONCRETE CHANHASSEN THRUSTBLOCK NG REVISED: DATE: 2-97 PLATE NO.: 1002 FILE -NAME: "--ihole Casting and Adjusting 9 (See Plate 2110) vide I&I Barrier on all sanitary er manhole(see plate 2109) -)hole steps, Neenah R1981J Aluminum, 16" on center. eps Shall be on Downstream e Unless Pipe Diameter is or Larger Joints in manhole to have ring rubber gaskets. vlaximum of 2 Short Manhole ers to be Used Directly ow Cone Section e shall be cut out flush In inside face of wall. Precast Inverts Must be 1/2 of Pipe Diameter and Benches Sloped 2" Toward the Invert imnniiiuii1 uiwniiwa vi Picuwi uuac � 6" for 14' deep or less, and increases 1" in thickness for every 4' of depth greater than 14'. NOTE: 1. Kor-n-seal manhole or equal considered acceptable alternate. 2. All dog houses shall be grouted on inside and outside. 3. When the manhole or catch basin structure is constructed outside the traveled roadway a witness post and sign shall be installed next to the manhole. SECTION CITY OF STANDARD f CHANHASSEN MANHOLE REVISED: 2-97,1 - 03,1 - 04 ' DATE. 2-97 PLATE No.2101 FILE NAME: 101 DROP LID 7.5' Minimum cover required S Tyler No. 6860 over top of water main. Mueller No. H-10361 Bibby -Ste -Croix No. B-5160 PROVIDE VALVE STEM RISERS VTO WITHIN 6" OF THE SURFACE IF THE DISTANCE FROM THE TOP NUT OF THE VALVE TO THE SURFACE IS GREATER THAN 8' Grade TOP Tyler No. 6860 26" Mueller No. H-10361 26" Bibby -Ste -Croix No. VB502 27" EXTENSION Tyler No. 58 14" No. 59 18" No. 60 24" Mueller No. 58 14" No. 59 20" Bibby -Ste -Croix VB520 No. 57 9" VB521 No. 58 14" VB522 No. 59 20" VB523 No. 60 26" BOTTOM Tyler No. 6860 65" Mueller No. H-10361 65" Bibby -Ste -Croix No. VB516 60" Valve and Box to be n plastic wrapped per BASE section 2.03a Adjust top to 3/4" below grade. Box to be set to provide 12" of adjustment. Tyler No. 6860 Mueller No. H-10357 Bibby -Ste -Croix B-5001 Gate valve box, screw type, 3 piece, 5 1/4" shaft, size G box, 7'-6' extended, #6 round base - GATE VALVE ADAPTER: 1/4" STEEL WITH PROTECTIVE COATING, 1/2" RUBBER GASKET INSTALLED BETWEEN THE GATE VALVE AND GATE VALVE ADAPTER. Resilient Wedge Valve Conforming to AWWA C-515-80 standards with all stainless steel nuts & bolts. 118"X18"X8" concrete block CITY OF GATE VALVE CHANHASSEN ANDBOX INSTALLATION REVISED: 2-97.1-03.1-04 DATE: 2-97 PLATE NO.: 1006 FILE NAME: 1006 J "1/1 BARRIER" INl` MANHOLE RING S' AS MANUFACTURE BY "STRIKE PROF PRECAST, BLOCK, OF BRICK MANHOLE CON CORBEL E OR CAST CONCRETE JSTING RINGS MASTIC SEAL NOTES: 1. TRIM TOP OF SEAL TO 1" ABOVE TOP OF RINGS. CASTING SHOULD NOT REST ON SEAL. 2. PLACE "MASTIC" ON TOP OF CONE SECTION AND BENEATH SEAL. 3. NOT TO BE USED WHEN THERE ARE MORE THAN 5 RINGS OR NO RINGS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE SEALS, THEN CONTACT THE CITY UTILITY SUPERINTENDENT FOR INSPECTION AT (952) 227-1300. CITY OF & CHANHASSEN BARRIER REVISED:1 - 04 DATE:1-03 � _ O PLATE NO.: 2109 n FILE NAME: - J U' P.J.K✓M.R.P. DRAWN I CHECKED P.J.K. -N 3 00 o 0 14m rn V bi � Z a ao c 0 C� z £ o v o r W QULnUJ� 6, m Z Q �' a g W °m W `n a i= � � ami Orn QJC:L I Q, _ QD C5 � In W W Q W DESIGNED P.J.K✓M.R.P. DRAWN I CHECKED P.J.K. SHEET ND, 8 It It 00 o 0 14m 0 � o o bi o _ a ao c 0 z £ o v o N N N N 6, m z a g W °m a� WQ a i= � � ami N C •C C _ > 3 E o i W o z 1- Q W 01-1, Z 0 U U U Li SHEET ND, 8 Q O 0 bi z ~ Libi z W (n WQ 'J {- _ z 1- Q W 01-1, Z 0 U U U Li DATE 4/7/05 PROJECT NU, 04-108 SHEET ND, 8 2005 TERRA ENGINEERING, INC. NEEHNAH-1979-0207 WITF 2" MIN. RISE OR APPROVED EQUAL Rings shall be set on ABS sealant or approved equal. 0.75" 1.5" BIT. WEAR 2" BIT BASE E OR OAST CONCRETE JSTING RINGS THICK CONCRETE -LAR NOTE: 2 -PIECE COVER RISER RINGS ARE NOT ALLOWED. BIT. WEAR COURSE ADJ. DETAIL CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH #R-1642 OR MCI #309 AND SHALL INCLUDE SELF SEALING VARIES SEE CHART TYPE LIDS STAMPED SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER AS APPROPRIATE WITH TWO CONCEALED PICK HOLES f— BIT. BASE OR BINDER MIN. (2-2') ADJ. RINGS AND a HDPE OR MAX. (3-4) ADJ. RINGS PRECAST CONCRETE (1-2" RING WITH MORTOR = 0.2') ADJUSTING RINGS 27" 6" THICK CONCRETE COLLAR BIT. BASE OR BINDER COURSE ADJ. DETAIL WEAR COURSE THICKNESS COVER RISER SIZE DEPTH OF CASTING SET BELOW BASE COURSE OR BINDER COURSE 1.5" 2" RISE 1.25" 2.0" 2" RISE 0.75" 2.5" 2" RISE 0.25" NOTES: 1. PRECAST CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS SHALL BE BEDDED WITH 1/4" TO 1/2" MORTAR. 2. HDPE ADJUSTING RINGS SHALL BE BEDDED WITH SEALANT MANUFACTURED BY LADTECH INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL. CITY OF MANHOLE CHANHASSEN CASTING AND ADJUSTING DETAIL REVISED: 1-00,1-04 DATE: 2-97 — ^y 7 PLATE NO.: 2110 FILE NAME: 110 PL VARIABLE HYDRANT VALVE BOX 6" 6'= 0 VARIES 5'-6' (SEE PLANS) 1/4" SLOPE PER FT. TO ROADWAY RETE SEE NOTES 1 & 3— 1 4" Class 5 Base 2' 3' 2.5' Min. NOTES: 1. TYPICAL 6" THICK CONCRETE SIDEWALK. 2. USE 7 1/2" THICK FOR COMMERICAL DRIVEWAY CROSSING. 3. JOINT SPACING AT 5' INTERVALS. EXPANSION JOINT SPACING AT 100' INTERVALS AND WHEN ABUTTING EXISTING CONCRETE OR STRUCTURE. CITY OF CHANHASSEN :D:2-99, 1-03 DATE: 2-97 IImLME:3Y3�III CONCRETE SIDEWALK PLATE NO.: 5 21 4 NOTE: L Grate Shown Face of Curb ' Direction of Flow Catchbosin casting and grate Neenah R3290 -L or equal 3' radius curb box. Precast concrete or HDPE adjusting rings. Minimum of 2-2", maximum of 5-2" concrete adjusment rings allowed with 1/4" - to 1/2" bed of mortar between each and a 6" thick concrete collar on the outside. Doghouses shall be grouted -on both the X inside and outside. 3'-0" '1'I'IIIII'� � • III�111 Grate to be 2" below gutter grade. 5 transition each side of catchbosin. Too of Curb Varies 6 1/2" Varies 24" x 36" Precast 5" 3' minimum 3" Grout 6" SECTION NOTES: 1. Steps shall be provided in all catch basin/manholes and storm sewer manholes. 2. Casting to be totally encased in concrete curb section. 3. No block structures are allowed. 4. No wood shims are permitted in the adjusting rings. CITY OF STORM SEWER CHANHASSEN CATCH BASIN REVISED: 1-00, 1-03 DATE: 2-97 _ ^ 7 PLATE NO.: 3101 IIIFILE NAME: 101 `� FLARE TO MATCH 5' min. 50R-60% OF BASE WIDTH OF WALK A� DIAMETER �_�� 1/5" J—j �yf7/8..-1 7/16"-1 7/16" I. BACK OF CURB DOME SECTION "\ 000000000 .v �- 000000000 000000000 L6, n f 5/8'-2 ]/8• 15/fe'(tnJ (I Daae (m) r` FRCUR FACE OF L CURB 6�--� �•sJ—' 4 m I n 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 A— J000000 0 0 O PLAN VIEW OF DIGONAL RAMP ' 5/rw 5/8'MIN. DOME SPACING CURB & GUTTER = 2 0 r � 0 -- a z z J z 0.08 FT./FT. OR FLAT TER O Q W CL 1 SECTION A—A Y m J M 0.08 FT./FT.SLOPE OF FLARED SIDE, (IF U EXISTING CONDITIONS DO NOT PERMIT, MAY 5 4 USE 0 10 FT /FT - 0 08 FT /FT SLOPE ) 6' 5' 7' 6' 8' 7' 9' 8' ELEVATION OF RAMP 10' 9' 1 1/2 INCH PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL, AASHTO M 213. 2 WHEN A MEDIAN IS NOT WIDE ENOUGH FOR TWO PEDESTRIAN RAMPS AND A 48" LANDING BETWEEN THEM, THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SHALL BE CUT THROUGH THE MEDIAN AT STREET LEVEL. 3Q 6" TO 8" IS THE REQUIRED OFFSET OF THE TRUNCATED DOME AREA FROM THE FRONT FACE OF CURB. ® ADA REQUIRED TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE 2' 0" MIN. IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH (4' 0" TYP.) OF THE CURB RAMP. THIS 2' 0" BY 4' 0" WIDTH (TYP.) TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE. THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A LIGHT COLOR (LIGHT GRAY, WHITE OR YELLOW) WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK IS A DARK COLOR. THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A DARK COLOR (RED, BLACK, DARK GRAY, OR BRIGHT YELLOW) WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK IS A "WHITE" OR LIGHT GRAY CEMENT COLOR. 5 SURFACE APPLIED TRUNCATED DOMES OR STAMPED CONCRETE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 6 TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL MEET THE CURRENT MNDOT STANDARDS FOR DETECTABLE WARNING SYSTEMS. CITY OF PEDESTRIAN J CHANHASSEN CURB RAMP REVISED: 1-98, 1-04, 1-05 DATE: 2-9 PLATE NO.: 5215 FILE NAME: 1S I 6" Conc. collar I � PLAN .Z R 4'-0" T 5" SECTION 24"x36" slab opening for Neenah R3290 -L or equal NOTE: L grate shown Neenah R3290 -L casting and grate or equal. Minimum of 2 maximum of 5-2" concrete adjustment rings with full beds. of mortar. Precast concrete or HDPE adjusting rings. 6" precast reinforced concrete slab. Top of barrel section under top slab to have flat top edge sealed with 2 beads of Ramnek or equal. All joints in manhole to have "0" ring rubber gaskets. Precast concrete section NOTES: 1. Doghouses shall be grouted on both the outside and inside. 2. No block structures are allowed. Manhole steps, Neenah R1981J or equal, 16" o.c., Aluminum steps approved. Minimum slab thickness, 6" for 14' depth. Increase thickness 1" for each 4' of depth greater than 14', and reinforce with 6"x6" 10/10 mesh. -Grout bottom of manhole to 1/2 diameter at pipe and slope grout 2" toward invert. CITY OF CATCH BASIN CHANHASSEN MANHOLE REVISED: 1-00, 1-03 DATE: 2-97 _^y7 PLATE NO.: 3102 IIIFILE NAME: 102 -0 6" I Distance to � variable m o z 3"r Top Bituminous Material D w o c 0 F—n O N 6' 3" 4' 0"min. O� 6' 3" 6' 5' 7' 6' 8' 7' 9' 8' ELEVATION OF RAMP 10' 9' 1 1/2 INCH PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL, AASHTO M 213. 2 WHEN A MEDIAN IS NOT WIDE ENOUGH FOR TWO PEDESTRIAN RAMPS AND A 48" LANDING BETWEEN THEM, THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SHALL BE CUT THROUGH THE MEDIAN AT STREET LEVEL. 3Q 6" TO 8" IS THE REQUIRED OFFSET OF THE TRUNCATED DOME AREA FROM THE FRONT FACE OF CURB. ® ADA REQUIRED TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE 2' 0" MIN. IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH (4' 0" TYP.) OF THE CURB RAMP. THIS 2' 0" BY 4' 0" WIDTH (TYP.) TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH THE ADJACENT WALKING SURFACE. THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A LIGHT COLOR (LIGHT GRAY, WHITE OR YELLOW) WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK IS A DARK COLOR. THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A DARK COLOR (RED, BLACK, DARK GRAY, OR BRIGHT YELLOW) WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK IS A "WHITE" OR LIGHT GRAY CEMENT COLOR. 5 SURFACE APPLIED TRUNCATED DOMES OR STAMPED CONCRETE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 6 TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL MEET THE CURRENT MNDOT STANDARDS FOR DETECTABLE WARNING SYSTEMS. CITY OF PEDESTRIAN J CHANHASSEN CURB RAMP REVISED: 1-98, 1-04, 1-05 DATE: 2-9 PLATE NO.: 5215 FILE NAME: 1S I 6" Conc. collar I � PLAN .Z R 4'-0" T 5" SECTION 24"x36" slab opening for Neenah R3290 -L or equal NOTE: L grate shown Neenah R3290 -L casting and grate or equal. Minimum of 2 maximum of 5-2" concrete adjustment rings with full beds. of mortar. Precast concrete or HDPE adjusting rings. 6" precast reinforced concrete slab. Top of barrel section under top slab to have flat top edge sealed with 2 beads of Ramnek or equal. All joints in manhole to have "0" ring rubber gaskets. Precast concrete section NOTES: 1. Doghouses shall be grouted on both the outside and inside. 2. No block structures are allowed. Manhole steps, Neenah R1981J or equal, 16" o.c., Aluminum steps approved. Minimum slab thickness, 6" for 14' depth. Increase thickness 1" for each 4' of depth greater than 14', and reinforce with 6"x6" 10/10 mesh. -Grout bottom of manhole to 1/2 diameter at pipe and slope grout 2" toward invert. CITY OF CATCH BASIN CHANHASSEN MANHOLE REVISED: 1-00, 1-03 DATE: 2-97 _^y7 PLATE NO.: 3102 IIIFILE NAME: 102 -0 6" I Distance to � variable m o z 3"r Top Bituminous Material D w o c 0 F—n O N DZD W \ r O� Q .� c E o-° 0 z I 6" I Distance to � variable It 1/2"r 3"r Top Bituminous Material 1 /2"r w o c 1 " � sl" U) O N >' 3/4pope er ft W \ r d Q .� c E o-° 0 e MnDOT 8618 ° c 3 > Concrete Curb and Gutter W 8" 18" � U — ( 6"1 Distance to � variable Q 1/2"r I I 3^r 1/2"r Top Bituminous Material � � J I W slope 3 4" per ft MnDOT B612 - W a Concrete Curb and Gutter 7 Y NOTE: o>E s"z' For Use Only with Private Driveways, W Q,Q Parking Lots, or Medians. j 28"R L V G N 12"R U Top Bituminous Material 68"R Q W �! ;16" C) N \ ' SURMOUNTABLE o 1/2 \ Concrete Curb and Gutter PROJECT NO 17 1/2" 10 1/2' 04-108 28" 4" 8" 1 1/8"r Bituminous Bituminous Curb surface 6" Shoe Formed N- CITY OF TYPICAL CURB CHANHASSEN AND GUTTER REVISED: 2-97 DATE: 2-97 _97 PLATE NO.: 5203 FILE NAME: "HYDRANTS SHALL BE MUELLER SUPER CENTURION" OPTION 94 BURIED STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE. MARKER TO BE 5 FOOT IN LENGTH, (250 OR APPROVED EQUAL) SPRING MOUNTED FOR SIDE. MOUNT�A APPLICATION RED & WHITE IN COLOR REFLECTIVE FIBERGLASS CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING OR FUTURE CURB OR GUTTER LINE HYDRANT HYDRANT TO BE VALVE BOX SECURLY COVERED WITH PLASTIC WRAP OR BAG TO INDICATE 18" MIN. THAT IT IS OUT OF 2.0% SERVICE. "--- --- -- --- 2 _ 3' , HYDRANT SHOE AND BARRELL P STREET LC SHALL BE PLASTIC WRAP ED a AS REQUIRED 10' PER SECTION 2.030 < TYPICAL r` 1 CUBIC YARD OF 1 1/2" CLEAR ROCK AND 2 LAYERS OF POLYETHYLENE (4 MIL.) GATE VALVE TEE WITH ADAPTER NOTES: 1. ALLHYDRANTS SHALL HAVE WEEP HOLES. 18"X18"X5" CONCRETE BLOCK 2. MINIMUM 7.5' COVER OVER MAIN. 3. ALL PAINTED SURFACES SHALL BE SUBJECT TO TWO YEAR WARRENTY PERIOD AS NOTED IN SECTION 2.09 OF THE WATERMAIN SPECIFICATIONS. 4. HYDRANT INSTALLATION SHALL INCLUDE A HYDRANT MARKER. - 5. ALL JOINTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED VIA MEGA -LUGS MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINT. 6. ALL HYDRANT TO BE PLUMB TO VERTICAL AXIS, MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE TO BE 1/2" PER FOOT OF HYDRANT. U It It w o c U) y 0 W ° _ Z d Q .� c E o-° 0 z ° c 3 rn d W � U — Z Q O a (D v � � J I W O `� -. M o`-a�c ° c W a V N D . Y o>E Z W Q,Q O j 10�= L V G N U DESIGNED P.J.K./M.R,P. I DRAWN M.R.P. CHECKED P.J.K. SHEET NO 9 It It 00 o c y y 0 W ° _ d Q .� c E o-° 0 z ° c 3 rn d � U — O LL1 � � m ° 'y0 V) (,() W Q o`-a�c ° c W a V N D . Y o>E Z 3E°L W Q 0> o 0 10�= L V G N U U W ti Q W z I LLl W C) SHEET NO 9 O W z M W LL1 V) (,() W Q J � Z F¢- W Q w 10�= r-) U U W ti Q W DATE 4/7/05 PROJECT NO 04-108 SHEET NO 9 V Q 1 CL 2pZ�, Ex. HO e x 1071.3 per_ a L 3, Bl Ex. 107" /,f % p S/orm Ex. Ho o Yb�. 6464 Mu ay Hi Rd, nom t/urmyHi71 c ctip jo�� 4, Bl 6 Ex, $ 6474 Mu rra Hill Rd, � d_ _ wale 06 1066.,.7 X. - OL �© EX. �----------------------- 4+0-� RhT / i Pleas int Hill 416,91b' s--------- ----- -----------------------------------------_ ----- ------� ��-------U J- - ~ -----_ _ Baseline tree canoe lover area (Per Surveyor 10/04�,0� I o 1\ -P -�-1 X I \\ 3 / q.a0 ~1 1 T A16 0 3 16 - -- arta � 7 link ,�3R/ ] -(.rR�wl�-- 52,7 ,¢2 ,I ,, il.y� ; / 018 \/ ,394 �3 1 �jCl , Lv 11_A5 T I .415 / TRFCPl2 _ - o / 7iPPOP12 n / T A22 / TR9A10 1 , ` ,CW24 3 0 / JRM14 l` , i q3 O7RPOP10 SRA1 /...02 J �`> `~J.18(y}a�J20.g16 yA�,�� / /(2S a i TREIO '•-'�}}04 B�l�J`i ��j`� TRBjd14 0 ; \JRPl1PI4 O X93 -411 gX JREB g4 fA 8 9 l\ ` \Ili'i _ `n ddP TRPONO ,397 ,3991 JRZt4TRB 2 •D�. 1�L,RE ( A1a �\- , '/ EX, 1f 0` 1, loci -1 've Addti�5r "gra f6 T/RE8 NEIR-�/1` ' + I 20 q t bti a \ -4 -1 ,(2 - i�48,8�18 sf awiglnat) �F61 % a6� \ -��------------ _ -- _ -�' l I (JRE12 ` ! TWAB� `�RAIa Pg1h \\\ -At Bs 106 a U 1 J PS CW10 - -~ 0 - - /- .-/ .! 4 x,92 / JRBLKWI2 TRA8 `\� �O I -j J -3BI -i85 \�AIO , .TRF14 273 / TRBLKWJ29 / TRA8 / ABED TRA14 i -27 - 1 J( i _ \TRBLKWI2 / AA12 w U % RrAs R 276 ATIO 3�7a '-'AVQPO �� 1`' `JI A6 ; TRA W79 v -366 /1\JRAIS 11` W Alz -1058---- �`JRgczo J _;��' -372 \T/Al2 ; O I 11 \\ �' (}TRPOPI6 1� ` 710 \ \ \`\ Y � ,.360 ,-350 ; TRA10 �RBC20 / JRp12 -��61 Lf l JR46 awAIO - 1„/ -/ (JRA2-10/TRA14 IN /�J�t1�, AAS 1356 d `. / Al2 FtTRA10 -359` I \ U7 JRPOPI4 J / JR%9 -,453 \JRA12\ \ 7j[ -----� - ( JRAe \ RTAE"-e' 2i 47a OS `/ TRA3-l2\� / rA6, 12/�/ T 14 R10R WZ `TRJ3445 Z /\ / ) - A10 h0// 1 I r~ ; eq 'j- ✓ \ 242 24 l i (7",.TA10 d \ 1 7RA14I TR 11O i, \ \ RA10 `�\\ RAIO ffi10 �k ,? TR3 T AB\`, / TRHICI4 v Ex,! Ex, House Po¢( << / Tim Larkin ' - �' HIC14��g� 9jSNS�x i (IBNR 5 ( P 3 AJgS�1•�j�'LRT T �J �a I \' 4 B M1 7 ARB �4 i IiAAR4 110'`'iABRd-7 % m . ; "RAs �e� Ae - _ ,� I- - I a aA� 49� -2.70 ( BR2s 7 � _ L5, B1 �- Ex, House L4, B2 Moline's Addition\ 1 \` <C- X J T R=181\QHCouse ,( ,1 I \ T ;,,JqB R2-18 i JR R20 i B 2a /Jackson R3-2/� Jai R2 PO i R2 Q0 I - \ T BRRO 9\ T R3-18 \1 I ' `RA RI5 / TA R15 % �pT6 �CJRA R15 I TRARIB `�4 j T RI8 Ex, Edge Bit_ (TV, I zq-qa�------- ; - _ I _ RA R�o E7-10-0' R/W 1, 3 ` 'ihn �i+d2o I SR9 A R1'E20 O TJ gA i a ;JRA R�5 LJ AR �-25�-25�3-`�A -zo - - _ Ex. 40' R/W `J Ato 'l< F TRA10 y\, , f� R ; a ��. ' - - I 0 1070 83/1055_32 ��c----- "� Ex, San, x--- - -184 \ A-/ .y43 . -l. ` / T POP 2 T A16-----------�.---------� E 22' b't 1 ps ; 7RA10 \ /.('/�� ` / JRPOPI2 \ N`A`. -�40 ', e 1 ,�7 \ ,^ / H , i - - - - - -Ex, Edge 4'� / 0 9 / 3 1`-/ a /JRA8 `. �} , J A6 \yip\` `IN / - - -. a - - - �t5 m 1 / ro 7 -"� -. I A39 /JRA8 \\ - 5 p `JRA8 / IC12/ t0 / 2442 •` N°\� ' , xm / HIC14 xN ` - - - - - - - - - - I LA1, ,l�P, TR"a1s�4 - '" 11rb69 i I ,? q -- CRESTVIEW DRIVE ...�. JRA14 /tons!, S t , -162 n / r cnou.. -241`1- W, w 11 ti i i •-f MM _ ` / (`J,Ri12 ;-,l ei-- _.o 9 /`pA18� :JRA14, Jjl_POPi6 \.\ `./ ,A,900 ;RA8 �� - -161 / m m r,J POP74• ll -437 ` `._/ \ ` ,y( ,TRA14 �. �O��1 'J` \ 0, � / T� 138 \ \ q JRA10 -_ n 0 9 Y ` c-� \ .y�.�. , 7 `vy�.y� -?J3 8tl ',t.`' /i7R�6 �� .X j i `1' d•QQ /TRA8 = -PO `*-1Z+4 / T A10 %\h � JWAl2 9 -� , �•� x^75 j 0 i �_ Ex,_ 6'shnin 11nk.f onto__ 545 ____------------ ---------------------18-`32" - 10\ 0 • JRHIC8 �\ gqJRAS -103 Prop, CB (by others) JRPOPl0 / POPS 1` / / \ / T ES 1 � / TRA8 174 �`I a `.-Y� •��•2-y i `JRA8 �` / / .A `J om ' \J'REB `.\ \JRAIO/8 1 04 5 TRA2-12 `, tiM A 01 0 P JRA10\ g `� lij2 SRQi� JRAliih TAB •-' / JRAIO ,-175 ; ,TRA12 \ \TRAIO \ ZP4,y33 4 \�y�T 279 In \ ,`TRA81111-/ \ ; TRA8 �� / NAl2 1 /RAl4 TRA10 JRA14 J i TRAIO / TRA19\ \\ / JWAB J` �'� / JRA12 l 1 �' g�D0�1'� SRPB ��\\ 9 1` RA10 \JRA �k.TRAA, `�( -202 TRA ` TRA�4 X1,7 w'e- / 10 1 " ,A16 .-13s / JRA10 0'a / �6 /-40 �" �21�n��' / '73'A e o I-�cI,,..iT,.WA14 l TRA14 �� 0 1 JRA%119p8 ly9 1 _, ,�22pp1 ,� ,'3itA10 O ,,.231 Sj A10 � A8 1 ` /^TRAiB i \TRA8/10 /fA24,8JRA10 ` .T RASO, O \J A30 ym 1 -/ XXX\ a )1.[g/ ' -4$4 ` ` i I� (TR"A16 i -182 `JRAI4/R5A8 I t I / TRA14y8 - 1I I _ 7 -389 `•-' / JRA10RA10 `JRP�l2 -4U ,h12 `./ / TRAIO X23 b ` / 18 `-' % '2 JRPOPI6 \ / IJP616'k, �g ..227 , TRPOPI4. JRPOP7\ _ I I i"e' R TR 14 / ,TRPOP20 / -T' `` ' �� x.226 J POPI6� POP7 Ex,``�❑utlot A, Shi�eley Rddtio�tt ogf6 y ^POP2-16 16 Prop. CB �\ 416,9'® Ex. metY fence GV (bj{ others) *- (b others) \ y \ Hyd/GV Xloy othersl)- 1052,00/1047.00 CB (by others) B`t,o c k 1 �\�' T 1 `PR�P�S`D PINEHURST `C43 Lits) FAowshares D%vel pment 4C `� � Nathan Franzen 95th -361-0832 11/,5/04 Pretim, ;Plat 1 En�r,: Westwood P ofessionlal Services' Inc, ;Chris Moehrl`; P 1952-937-5150 6 I j\ � 2 1 A1 ,�3309 ~� 1'1 / (JRAIO f! X (RA - _ _ ID ,1 - - �-- - _ Ex, :40'-P/ W - - - 31° ; ; r 1 ( J'R 12/TRESO i IHIC14 - / A14�p2 JRA8 IN -y3 6 \; I V E E10 0i U ,�229911 ° C: ', Abblett 9 , JRA8 0--- I Ex. House ,fig . / TAESo i - ..o `� d i n 88 ' fU ; i ,r"ry91TRP1 14 +� f CL .po�,�95 A10 82 " RPO9 2`{6 IRPOPI�' \ Ex. whit�-pr-uacy fence IO San. MH 12 (by others) 1066,00/1048,50/1048.40 (17,60') 1 A �10�s7_ 1 -- - 3 Block 2 ./V 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET OWNER/DEVEL❑PERi Roy Lecy Lecy Brothers Hones 15012 Hwy, 7 Mtka,, MN 55345 952-944-9499 ENGINEERi Peter Knaeble, PE Terra Engineering Inc, 6001 Glenwood Ave, Mpls,, MN 55422 763-593-9325 SURVEYOR, David Crook, RLS Demars-Gabriel Surveyors 3030 Harbor Ln, #111 Plymouth, MN 55447 763-559-0908 RWW34 -135 * TRAIO - :;R1A21a 1 1Qp TRA8 12 TRA8 JRHIC8 �\ gqJRAS -103 Prop, CB (by others) JRPOPl0 / POPS 1` / / \ / T ES 1 � / TRA8 174 �`I a `.-Y� •��•2-y i `JRA8 �` / / .A `J om ' \J'REB `.\ \JRAIO/8 1 04 5 TRA2-12 `, tiM A 01 0 P JRA10\ g `� lij2 SRQi� JRAliih TAB •-' / JRAIO ,-175 ; ,TRA12 \ \TRAIO \ ZP4,y33 4 \�y�T 279 In \ ,`TRA81111-/ \ ; TRA8 �� / NAl2 1 /RAl4 TRA10 JRA14 J i TRAIO / TRA19\ \\ / JWAB J` �'� / JRA12 l 1 �' g�D0�1'� SRPB ��\\ 9 1` RA10 \JRA �k.TRAA, `�( -202 TRA ` TRA�4 X1,7 w'e- / 10 1 " ,A16 .-13s / JRA10 0'a / �6 /-40 �" �21�n��' / '73'A e o I-�cI,,..iT,.WA14 l TRA14 �� 0 1 JRA%119p8 ly9 1 _, ,�22pp1 ,� ,'3itA10 O ,,.231 Sj A10 � A8 1 ` /^TRAiB i \TRA8/10 /fA24,8JRA10 ` .T RASO, O \J A30 ym 1 -/ XXX\ a )1.[g/ ' -4$4 ` ` i I� (TR"A16 i -182 `JRAI4/R5A8 I t I / TRA14y8 - 1I I _ 7 -389 `•-' / JRA10RA10 `JRP�l2 -4U ,h12 `./ / TRAIO X23 b ` / 18 `-' % '2 JRPOPI6 \ / IJP616'k, �g ..227 , TRPOPI4. JRPOP7\ _ I I i"e' R TR 14 / ,TRPOP20 / -T' `` ' �� x.226 J POPI6� POP7 Ex,``�❑utlot A, Shi�eley Rddtio�tt ogf6 y ^POP2-16 16 Prop. CB �\ 416,9'® Ex. metY fence GV (bj{ others) *- (b others) \ y \ Hyd/GV Xloy othersl)- 1052,00/1047.00 CB (by others) B`t,o c k 1 �\�' T 1 `PR�P�S`D PINEHURST `C43 Lits) FAowshares D%vel pment 4C `� � Nathan Franzen 95th -361-0832 11/,5/04 Pretim, ;Plat 1 En�r,: Westwood P ofessionlal Services' Inc, ;Chris Moehrl`; P 1952-937-5150 6 I j\ � 2 1 A1 ,�3309 ~� 1'1 / (JRAIO f! X (RA - _ _ ID ,1 - - �-- - _ Ex, :40'-P/ W - - - 31° ; ; r 1 ( J'R 12/TRESO i IHIC14 - / A14�p2 JRA8 IN -y3 6 \; I V E E10 0i U ,�229911 ° C: ', Abblett 9 , JRA8 0--- I Ex. House ,fig . / TAESo i - ..o `� d i n 88 ' fU ; i ,r"ry91TRP1 14 +� f CL .po�,�95 A10 82 " RPO9 2`{6 IRPOPI�' \ Ex. whit�-pr-uacy fence IO San. MH 12 (by others) 1066,00/1048,50/1048.40 (17,60') 1 A �10�s7_ 1 -- - 3 Block 2 ./V 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET OWNER/DEVEL❑PERi Roy Lecy Lecy Brothers Hones 15012 Hwy, 7 Mtka,, MN 55345 952-944-9499 ENGINEERi Peter Knaeble, PE Terra Engineering Inc, 6001 Glenwood Ave, Mpls,, MN 55422 763-593-9325 SURVEYOR, David Crook, RLS Demars-Gabriel Surveyors 3030 Harbor Ln, #111 Plymouth, MN 55447 763-559-0908 U SHEET INDEX. m SHEET 1 EXISTING CND TIONS PLAN SHEET 2 PRELIMINARY PL T 2 SHEET 3 PRELIMINARY UTI ITY PLAN (D) SHEET 4 PRELIMINARY GRA ING/ERASION CONTROL PLAN/ � L N � m � TREE PRESERVATI N PLAN O SHEET 5 PRELIMINARY LANDS APE PLAN U Q m Z co O a rn V a O " 0 � i a 0) c z O N O (D) _ 6 a m�0 � L N � m � d -p CL Z Q a = v C a lz V Z O O T _j J W ()�M m "M"01_- Q, Q L a-0 O Qj Qj N QQj M o �.L W DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED f fAd LU LU W i DATE 11/22/04 PROJECT NO. 04-108 SHEET NO. 1 Q co co O a C O ° L a O " O a 0) c z O N O Z « a > C 3 a m�0 � L N � m d -p 3Ld a � m LLJ a = v C d a ° c c O T H = o o a v o Z Ld Q "M"01_- 0� = L a-0 O U U =�wv _ E' a� in LU LU W i DATE 11/22/04 PROJECT NO. 04-108 SHEET NO. 1 Q n�n VJ a Z 0 W Z �- z � Z U 3Ld LLJ L7 1--A(41 Z > Q F- H = Z Ld Q X 0� = Ld U U LU LU W i DATE 11/22/04 PROJECT NO. 04-108 SHEET NO. 1 0 0 —�- 1068'-- 8' , —�----------1066-'' l / �J ——�-------1064---_.' ✓! m 10 / b2p��J Ex. Horse X 1071„7 v L3, BI EX. 107' 15� Sloan Ex. Ho Y ��• 6464 Mu ay Hi Rd, mA/uimyH%/ B� c p 4, Bl d +ti __ Ex, Swale 10�� g 6474 Murry Hill Rd, ' ai. /� e a\� 0- ' r Ems- RhT�- c� // i ------------------------ +w w S_ (( U i Pleas\pnt Hill -_41j6,91b' --_ cl � _ — — — — — — — — — — — - - -------------------------------------- ---------------- - \7 + -U ------------ l �• '�� tD i pb i CU-- S– X i -- ---- - - � 7—---f-e—nc_e_ � CO --- -----------------------------------------_ _6c�-ink oEx,i 139,16Ease. 1 0 19.38 i _--_ - u t _-- c 0 / I � 79,16 �_- �- I _ --� _--1- -- ---- 1 v \ `� = - Fk C Ex. �S 1, Block 1 Shiveley Addti6n _ X48 i�18 sf original) ;0' chq/ \" Ex, Impervious area \ I j `�cP h Lot 1=8940 sf (18,2;(.) a u� 0 L5, Bl �-- Ex. House L4, B2 Moline's Addition` 30' RSB -- \✓ I ` I U i W w r - 18,606 sf \ JJ `�� o ! a I \I I �2 1 F 1�9\ \t 3 ' 4 9 \ I U i 50,258 sf % Ex I Ex, House ; ! ICU �1Jackson _ -�_`X a U Po¢l LJ l O 1 I w Ct k / f I �`��CX i Tim Larkin i l� w NI 58- Q u i ti \\l MI i - --- SB_` 1 / t `•.� 65,84 \ \\ V o / Ely./R/W to be vacated. / c I4� i R ` / 4; 50 W E CD I 2 U j !� VS . C� 12 _� `� Ex, Ed- Bit_r--_- 1 - / sf) 7 r------- i;Z �• I'' ea Se. / �,( Ex, 100' R/W' O I O �• -�` ! / M' 13 End prop, street/curb I I S6, 0 11� �I (10+36,89) LLJ Iz / I _� �- j ( lJ Eas-e, _ _ _ t \� _ \ \ o / m 50 Remove ex. bituminous z 12 D& -T a - - 14- v L__---_� (to future north curb tine) g ^� / (36 ) -� I �S� OJ� z (restore with sod) 1 iraiL - _EaSeuk s 31,I( \, 1 L Tr \< y- � l � - I >s�--�81/ / �o I_,-\ w 5 vi M i w �j � @�5i FSBi I i I FSB�`�� - 1 °" \` \ i �y 1p6 I o f ; o I \ - '� �.I I I O as �4b �Uo i I / v,CD iU Ln�� I \ / I I I 3! /4 \, ' m o // �. t j = 1052•\ 1� /o LO \` I �' i I 'I �� \ NI I A � u wQj Ln I o \\ t a' i1/4 6_'�balri link -£once -_iso I Ex.1 ! - - I � w o o ll o .a 4 — — — I L----�--- __ 11 I I i' ! L ---------------�A--� ! 301 RSB j 30' RSB T-------- I c_ u� !' S0 /W 3 + ------ R - 22,311 sf i 31 B -B q 115,403 sf ---------------- -i�58 ---- 1,406 sf 1 �`----------- w --------- '�------ 1 Ease, >� Ex �❑utlot A Shi�Nele Addt'-rt------ A N 10\ 12'2.09 \ y ion \ 127.00 l 1\ - - Prop. CB Prop, CB 416,0 Ex, mets l fence GV <ki others) J (by others) \ <by others) \, y O San 1052.00/1047,00\'`, Hyd/GV. �by others11 106 CB (by others) 10 0, 10( \` •� B'�ock 1 `\''PR�POSD PIN�HURST\`'�C43 Lits) o h u u 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Chanhassen 'RSF' Singte Family Residential Zoning District Min, lot area 15,000 sf Min. lot frontage 90' (cut is 90' at 30' FSB) PUBLIC Min, lot depth 125' Max lot impervious 25% Front setback 30' (need var. for 25') Rear setback 30' Side setback 10' (30' corner) Front/rear ease, 10' Side ease, 5' Future curb line (31' B -B) 3 (by others) — — — Future 50' R/W line --------------- ,i -- �.- - r te.------Ex, 40' R/W Ex`Cn, MH 107083/10 N Ex San, Ex, 22' bit, 3 mQ --------- -- -was -=- ------------- �o -- --Ex-_Ed Q_e Bites., - - ---�L--------------o')a ------ CRESTVIEW DRIVE d. CD L O f�— Ex. 40' R/W W Future 50' R/W line � z Temp, street sign Future street centerline 3' (by Developer) / Abblett I fU a O� O Ex. white --privacy fence MH 12 (by others) 6,00/1048,50/1048,40 (17.60') r o rquwshares Djvel pment L*L, �aAthan Franz$n N 3 a? r'e °< 8 ; CD ` 99P-361-0832 `�" 11/,5/04 Prelim, ;Pia 1 i oD a` S�AQ000 \ En�r,; Westwoogl P ofessio6al Servicesr Inc, j ? Chris Moehrll P ,/ y 1 60 <J 952-937-5150 I RM \ fig© 11 � \ O CO 1 Block 2 2 3 SITE DATA, Total site area 3.36 ac. No, of lots 5 lots Density L5 units/ac, Avg, lot size 24,234 sf Min, lot size 15,403 sf U < v 0) Z 0 3 0 U Z 0 If 7 � Q 3w UJ j (b Ln a cu Q� Cd _Z o c/ (U UJ O�� U U W a 0\ Q, Qj C5 DESIGNED P.J.K. DRAWN H.A.L. CHECKED P.J.K. Ory �— 1,'0 U Ic a o_ L 3 v o,C 1) C 00 L a aE c w E ov o 3 N -0 0 U O O QJ 0) N 0 0 a O O + v, U NO TE 7� >3E0L� o ao 0, O O.. C.�.. C C L C _ =. Li V) -q- 14- CO ro < v 0 z 0 0 If 7 � Q 3w � W V) cu \ Cd W ci z c/ (U al ci�= U U W a DESIGNED P.J.K. DRAWN H.A.L. CHECKED P.J.K. v o,C 1) C 00 L a aE c w E ov o 3 N -0 0 U O O QJ 0) N 0 0 a O O + v, U NO TE 7� >3E0L� o ao 0, O O.. C.�.. C C L C _ =. Li V) -q- 14- CO ro U W T a DATE 11/22/04 PROJECT NO 04-108 SHEET NO. 2 < Q 0 z }- z_ Q 3w W V) I—I \ W ci z c/ Lv Q n ci�= U U U W T a DATE 11/22/04 PROJECT NO 04-108 SHEET NO. 2 A O m 0) ° a, a, O Y L 0 Ut S a U v a X x W W 0 CD 0 Nt J ID 0 v V) W J Q Q, Q u H C � Y Ld 3 U Q u Y �D z � w Ld Z z_ +' U >Q u O) a +> O 0 Q) - M U O 6 £ o L v S +> 14-U L L i / Ex, 6'chain link fence VO — — — — — — — — — — — — moo/ 10\ - 8r ST 11 Ex, House vloxlJ �� \ p L3, Bl Zr. 107'-15'RCPSIorm 0.9X Ex. House ��2 6464 Murray Hill Rd. �fmm ,l/umay p L4, B1 Swale �� \\6474 Murray Hill Rd. +Jp6 cs�s.EX. BERM Pleasant Hill ��®��-------416,; ' N U XI 230,37 _--------- -i 52,73 -- ti139,16 ------- io'-Ease, _----__-------' to Ex. Lot 1, Block 1 Shlveley Addtion Grade to [ Gr 0.dre to I 048,818 sf original) C lr_IQ-�"`yam dr Ex. impervious area CB3. CB3 CB3 J III Lot 1=8940 sf (18.2%) 1050/1056,00 IA \. Q ' \ I 4 Wi 0 ofo 3 , Ex, Ex, House � �X3 \ W Pool Blo 1 1 Tire Larkin \ ��\ Of H d./GV 1 �_- 8" cult' rt o CB 45' R. B/C (field v rif ) / 106 .80/1054,78 \ 61 / a O - � a SP w / C-3 r 309'-8" PV \ 03/104 016.0 12' D&U Ease_ 2 - - - - - _ la� Q, It 1063.00 050. (12 7') 30' R. B -C 8' S X12 Trail Ease GV GV CBp1G1��i�p \ I ;Ex, 50' R/W N �-- CS W o JJ �Q: a Li I� N 0,a ) ti W' �, LO U7 5 'sem �Oi ------------------ 10' Ease, Ex, Oudot A, Prop, CB (by others) 416.90 Ex. metal fence GV (by others) p (b others) y Hyd/GV (by others) _ 1052,00/1047.00 CB (by others) Block 1 PROPOSED PINEHURST (43 Lots) L Plowshares Devel pment LLC a Nathan Franzen 8 952-361-0832 �� 11/5/04 Pre(Im. Plat Engrg Westwood P ofessional Services Inc. Chris Moehrl P 7 952-937-5150 �1A A ❑ CO I– a 3 y 1 v Hyd./C 50 P/W 31' B -B L5, 131 L4, B2 Moline's Addition Jackson Ex. R/W to be vacated, Ex. Edge Bit_ _ _ _ _ _ 10' clear space regd. around all hydrants. Ciel no street lights, trees, shrubs, Xce( Energy, Qwest, cable TV, transformer boxes, etc,) Any connections to ex. MH or CB must be core drilled. San, Sewer 8" PVC SDR35 San, Service 6" PVC SDR26 Watermain 8" PVC C-900 Water Service 1" Type K copper 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Chanhassen 'RSF' U Min. lot area 15,000 sf Min, lot frontage 90' (cul is 90' at 30' FSB) PUBLIC Min, lot depth 125' Max lot impervious 25% Front setback 3 1 N rn V Side setback v i Front/rear ease. Z Side ease. 0) � Remove ex. bituminous (to future north curb line) Q W0 Z W �-n QL� w (restore with sod) Z Q� a w V 0� Cl� = 0- LU o M Future curb line (31' B -B) Z � cs rn m 3 0 ,32/1049.22 ) — — — — -------- ILL- 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Chanhassen 'RSF' Single Family Residential Zoning District Min. lot area 15,000 sf Min, lot frontage 90' (cul is 90' at 30' FSB) PUBLIC Min, lot depth 125' Max lot impervious 25% Front setback 30' (need var, for 25') Rear setback 30' Side setback 10' (30' corner) Front/rear ease. 10' Side ease. 5' + CD_ i3 Ex. 100 R/W End prop. street/curb (10+36.89) H Z H H af J L io � Remove ex. bituminous (to future north curb line) Q W0 Z I x �S��OJ w (restore with sod) -1 0 Z w S 0� Cl� = 0- U U Future curb line (31' B -B) (by others) Future 50' R/W line 3 0 ,32/1049.22 ) — — — — -------- - -.— - i n,�TR-------- Future 1070,83/185 Ex, 2� bit------ 8' PVC WM 2' 3 - wQ 3'� Ex San, o Ex,—Edqe Bit.— - -- — --------c-----CO0- — - .-------- CRESTVIEW DRIVE �° --------------------------------- - ------------ - – – W LiL – — — — Ex, 40' R/W End Prop, 8" WM at 10+40 w/ GV _ _ _ Future 50' R/W tine N c Temp, street sign Future street centerline U 3 (by Developer) 7 Q, 0 C Abblett 0 CD -a - i aQ N X W Ex. white privacy fence San, MH 12 (by others) 1066.00/1048.50/1048,40 (17.60') 1 3 RPh � �Soxo Block 2 `3 hSJ C< ACJ 2 L Q, c c d 3 N ob i v C1 a L J +> 3 U) U i av Cl 0 o CO cu Oj a \ \ CU aJ IDESIGNED P.J.K. DRAWN H.A.L. CHECKED P. JK. v CO CO o � 0 0 N C O � L 0 6 dose z E.0 -0 0 O 3 J O L 0 N .�' O T— 0 � e at 7 N 2 2-0� C N` �3EoL�� 0--a"C N ow 1 S I- C L C i N O _ L M ,. w cn o_ o ti U W ti a DATE 11/22/04 PROJECT NO. 04-108 SHEET NO. 3 < W H Z H H 3w Q W0 Z ; -1 0 Z Ld W Q 0� Cl� = 0- U U ti U W ti a DATE 11/22/04 PROJECT NO. 04-108 SHEET NO. 3 0 -----------1066= ; - �---------1064--- �-------1062-_'"" ( J %cl Ex, HoIse X 1o�131p la7v — p L3, Bl Zr. 107' 1�S101M Ex, Ho OrO�2 6464 Mu ay HI Rd. L4 Bl Swale � �o, 6474 Murry Hill Rd. - \ p e x 1066.3 --- \EX. RM--_ I Plea�p.nt Hill U _9lb ( ks------------------------------------------ 416- - - - - - ------- --- - - �u 11 £ - - -- --- -- Baseline tree canoe ec/over area 1 (Per Surveyor 10/04 ID �{ \0 ------------L:- ) m1p6�'-_ w I 23 2-12/la - 6 �,{2 ^ 2 7 3 7,$ a3�i --- -- - x -- S TRM%yx•i 6 _ link � , iW / � VO � N TREW12 - .� I 1` 9 3 35 �1 ` Ra �3 % 9,16 `+;zTRCW24 T 5 TIFPOPI2 1 O ;T A22 `TRAIO 1 }Oo 02 I�-' hj1-E 9�\° a �� `TRM14 �� _ A ��`.` 11 TRPOPIO / TRA1 '" D ` -1'3i a J�' I6 -4-.4 d 1 TRE10 , 1 ." TRa �e f�A-q< ��``£ . q 1� � r � TRPOPIa � Pa \ „�g " r \\ O 93 " x¢01 q0�. /E8 1 �t T'/''RE8 m ,9 1\ \ ' /�2hlk� / ___ _ f / I �n dy8 \ T�ePorto TREE �99i TR¢QTiRB 12 tO `y1 `T Al -\` A1e1 Ex, �ti 1, Mock -4 ve Addt yaJ ti p Bey v D:� to ' y i SRE10- `-Ur ade y1V :' / r d•86bi1; \ _ _ �Gn it -1,,\ �. ` y \:= drain to iie12 /R4na . T nla 1 ��/� c iW 8,18 sf o»igrnat) 1. ? e6 " h AAim ervious area �g� �g3, \--, CB CB3• I `., ' v `` Ph°P 1h Lb4 =8940 sf (182' ' TRPOPa / TRCVIO 10� ---- a�ati '/�-�/7 •\.` ; BLKMIl2 asa � a ' ...� (' � / ! i `` k`TRAB i a / , 373 �Rgi P� ern9pLr/.1/�/$}g85 F •\ aaTRF14 /�� L0 I I p EX,I \ ( i A14 / d e re BRAS AS _ �' I \ i EX, House i p "' _V5 - ser,` / \\ x U POaI� l ``TRBLKWI2 / T A \ ; W 9-' L J O / `\ %TRA x_ 7 I b D /i iJ1t�9Pg `�` O T,a T76'78 \'� N �k Tim Larkin I % fj i LLJ�/ �Al2`1058-- Yom,RC6 UTRA12 ti `TRA ,f0. ` \ \ _�__� I /• (-TP/P0P16I �':/� °lo O 1 •\ � .,` M4 c I Y 3"(z),�,'� `�.\ -000 hex, C°t\ i .� QR g1M 8 cul V t AIO as TRAYS :-10/ Ala �H CB2 50' R/W : \ ~� ner :Qae LRJ _ -.-y..\ & ` s• (field v ,rlf ) I a / TRA32 T Aa ash `. \ 45' R. B, -C v s aa6 as �aTR o -wren tibL2�' 1062,80/1054?�8 A. x b \ \ \�'/Oiler) I a ' U TRPOPI4-�' ,`TRAYQ > ; A , �^1 X.ij ( AA \ � Rl .-.3q, 9CD 3-12 (Si^�' LLJ w� -t-7 r Z `T A14 I FZ-I n10 _ . . J —�---------- -------------------------- I - -_ - ----------------------- 1052 - 5' B1t. Trail rl 3 U Baseline canopy cover area T T L 4 ac, v QX Cl r L `p ° L N i� i 0 Q 4 9 .yy}} TR A T •� ac, 814 TRPEIP18oil r 'a E i o RA10 \ L out +I Canopy area to be removed + U ; V) ; ac, L L i O J� o azo �<<A Z i I 0 ko —�---------- -------------------------- Total site area - -_ - ----------------------- 1052 - --- '� --------- ------------- Iaso_- 8 10\ \ \ ATO 11 . \40 C3 `TRHIC8 \ u P _ {aTRA10 \ \ p0 .ry' \ /' AT AI* a i \T,AI, \ ( AM / \gip / R2 i7pA�1pK p7Al2'"1^STAB (T A10 i rtz RAle L - Prop, CB ' (by others) o� A Q; •I- p,°h', by p �\� `�.,` �•�.�( / o � CB 10�1103� erg I \ 1 ,i 9 �I - A\�; 3 T 91 1 TIIt12/2610 X162 'i' / 1T6RPOP14^ 1 4 n _TRPOP10 ``TRPOPB ' T AIO/8 lkout ,T ' T A10 "§ gj.5 A8 rr 591 91 l� 279 TRA10 BSC; BR2? B's mt, 160,5 `\ 1 2'9`�I N •.`I a \\ I` TRAIA ' (.��' , '. ' •,_J \TRA2,$TRA10 -� \AAIIN i�.1_ (7) `TRAIO T Al ; k Br •�(., •9 _ .� \ - Z� My 105 40al4I \ I I ', 50` T9W £U `TRA14 3 " 7AS i�90P12 i b Gradin Limit/Silt nce� \ 1% ! 31' B -B �._._. i�A10RAIo _-6•�' -ITree Prer, Fen e -I. Q / TRPOf 4 1` ,� ,,-T ` S `"' / \ , TRA10"-'�•- • -�• ,y88 i i' TRPOPI6 \ `S OP16`I „rs°Qa ,227 1 TRPOPI4 / TRPOP20 -1 / pa ')iii/ "", TRPOPI6 P P'. �yy22 \� S�y�•'^ ` ` ' r � �`` / `�TRPBP2-16 X A1'BP4 OPdK �. Bx, \Eutlot A, ShiYeley (($ddtiori1 y A n � \ /6 Prop, CB� 416,91 Ex. met 1, fence GV (by others) (by others) \\ \ \ Hyd/GV Xby others)- 1052,00/1047,00 11 '' CB (by others) -4 3�o c k 1 `\'`�` � `\ \, �ets) 1 FR❑P❑S`(D PINEHURS`(43 LT N owshares Divel pment 4C 1s WAthan Franzen TP N 951? -361-0832 ii 11/,5/04 Prelim, 1;Plat i Ent,: Westwood P ofessiornal Services/ Inc, i ` Khris Moehrl';, P ; I 1952-937-5150 % 1 s� F CD 00 A 6_ 9 / 3 2 /_ - E x, House�- L5, Bl L4, B2 \ �- _Z/V Moline's Addltlon\ R2( l° Remove ex, drive 'access to Lot 1. / 2 locate ex. 2 R15 e' tr, monuments R15 verify w/ DevelJ / Ex. R/W to be vacated, / RIB /75' temp, rock construction 012 entrance (maintain throughout O 21B Ex_ Edge Bit, 1 Z - construction), �i3�o Ex. 100' R/W End prop, street/curb } (10+36,89) �20 / � i ° Remove ex, bituminous ID 4 1�G Jc� (to future north curb line) % Lx (restore with sod) Future curb line (31' B -B) 3 (by others)__ _ _ Future 50' R/W line eg 7L45 ---Ex, 40' R/W MH - - 0_7 83 n55_i? _- Ex San. Ex, 22' bit, 3 0 0 _-�.�--- - ------ .-+L Ex. Ed e Bit —_� ---- CRESTVIEW DRIVE CD �° /_________________ ----------------------- _ LLJ Ex, 40' R/W x Future 50' - W line w 41@mil, street sign Future street centerline (by Developer) / Q \ �l v ! Abblett Ex, House Cs f CV a 00 UJ Ex, whit2-pw4uacy fence San. MH 12 (by others) 1066,00/1048,50/1048.40 (17.609 '1068 V' 3 \\ D 1,1s�Ox Block 2 � o \ �� 3• , Qh o C� A -- -� N p t �J \ 2 U-N TREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONS, Z QjL P8 Total site area 3,36 ac, V 3 12 Baseline canopy cover area 2,39 ac, (71.1% of total site) oa Non -canopy cover area 0,97 ac, (28.9% of total site) I Canopy area to be removed 1,43 ac, U O azo (to grading limit shown) l) CQ O) 3 nil 6 / Canopy cover area remaining after grading 0.96 ac. (28.6% of total site) CZ) 0 _a (to grading limit shown) 3: o, Min. canopy cover required / 1.55 ac, (46,0% of total site) / (per City table @ 46% of total site) \ 00 \ [R2 Additional canopy cover required 0,59 ac. x 1.2 = 0.71 ac. = 30,928 sf 30 0 30 60 10 Area of canopy cover/tree (per City) 1089 sf/tree No, of landscape trees required 29 trees I SCALE IN FEET R$+18 ASSUME 0,50' CROWN (FIN, CL TO GUT In Rea i t/ 1 R2 -IB Rao I R2o /Jackson Ex, House R3-2�' R240 �� R2( l° Remove ex, drive 'access to Lot 1. / 2 locate ex. 2 R15 e' tr, monuments R15 verify w/ DevelJ / Ex. R/W to be vacated, / RIB /75' temp, rock construction 012 entrance (maintain throughout O 21B Ex_ Edge Bit, 1 Z - construction), �i3�o Ex. 100' R/W End prop, street/curb } (10+36,89) �20 / � i ° Remove ex, bituminous ID 4 1�G Jc� (to future north curb line) % Lx (restore with sod) Future curb line (31' B -B) 3 (by others)__ _ _ Future 50' R/W line eg 7L45 ---Ex, 40' R/W MH - - 0_7 83 n55_i? _- Ex San. Ex, 22' bit, 3 0 0 _-�.�--- - ------ .-+L Ex. Ed e Bit —_� ---- CRESTVIEW DRIVE CD �° /_________________ ----------------------- _ LLJ Ex, 40' R/W x Future 50' - W line w 41@mil, street sign Future street centerline (by Developer) / Q \ �l v ! Abblett Ex, House Cs f CV a 00 UJ Ex, whit2-pw4uacy fence San. MH 12 (by others) 1066,00/1048,50/1048.40 (17.609 '1068 V' 3 \\ D 1,1s�Ox Block 2 � o \ �� 3• , Qh o C� A -- -� N p t �J \ 2 U-N L Z QjL V 3 I z ° oa UJ T N ° z_ zz ; M U O I W l) CQ O) 3 nil 6 N Z {ry 0 or, o) w W CZ) 0 _a 171) 3: o, DESIGNED DRAWN I CHECKED F RJ. LA.! J. a v co L O o�c a .- C O O o 6 dN C w z Eovo � rn C a y 70. O 0 �. J y o >,, ° 1 dy .z 0 -c 0� z t n- av c o �J v a10a) NCL 177 Q LL Z Q U Z /O1 V J W � Z oz z Q� Q W J �a_ L zH z 3 L,J Q W_ 0 Q >Q U > F- _ ry ryLi wQ Q 0 cl�= z LL, U U i1 W J LL] LLJ L,.J DATE 11/22/04 PRDJECT NO. 04-108 SHEET NO,, 4 L QjL d 3 ° oa d T N +' ; M U U 7Z3 i 3 QP N J CL 1 o, In O O \ \ 00 \ W. al a1 k DESIGNED DRAWN I CHECKED F RJ. LA.! J. a v co L O o�c a .- C O O o 6 dN C w z Eovo � rn C a y 70. O 0 �. J y o >,, ° 1 dy .z 0 -c 0� z t n- av c o �J v a10a) NCL 177 Q LL Z Q U Z /O1 V J W � Z oz z Q� Q W J �a_ L zH z 3 L,J Q W_ 0 Q >Q U > F- _ ry ryLi wQ Q 0 cl�= z LL, U U i1 W J LL] LLJ L,.J DATE 11/22/04 PRDJECT NO. 04-108 SHEET NO,, 4 A`o O m v Ex, House x 1a7L9 a1 p1 L3, B1 Ex 107' 13"RCPs1orrr7 agx Ex, House o Y ��, 6464 Murray Hill Rd. from d/urroy H7//?o. CBJ p L4, B1 Swale �� 6474 Murray Hill Rd. i E - ., ` ami u 75 a ° +JOS 3 �s.EX, BERM x Pleasant Hill w w 8S u 0 JI .a Citi D W 230,37 O� 52,73 3916 0 0 CD J O U W J Q v q u H Z � W 3 d s Q u V �D Z O w LJ Z z 4' U �a 's W a +' O 0 N -M U o 6 E O i � S + U wo / Ex. 6'chain link fence — _ — — _ — — — _ — — VO 10 ATO 11 WP CGS ,�,-�,., 6GS_ Ex, Lot 1, Block 1 Shiveley Addtion (48,818 sf original) Ex, impervious area Lot 1=8940 sf (18,27) Ex, House Bio i Tim Larkin BHS \ ` CGS \ i 50' R, R/W ` 45' R. B -C WP WP ,BHS BHS -- - B GS �^ WP WP - � 3 BHS % Q oQ, �� ►�- 30' R, B -C M \ �k \ u-) ail \ + CC) WP BHS \ cu - / — E P \ _ Ex S50' R/W Is W CGS �- 6N H cis i S 3S 4 50 R/W 5 31' B -B Ex. Dutlot A, Shiveley Addtion _.j Prop, CB Prop, CB 416.90 Ex, metal fence GV (by others) Ip (by others) (by others) Hyd/GV (by others) 1052,00/1047.00 CB (by others) Block 1 PROPOSED PINEHURST (43 Lots) Plowshares Dev el, pment LLC 0o Nathan Franzen o� 952-361-0832 --A 11/5/04 Prelim. Plat 13 o` Irl Engrg Westwood P ofessional Services Inc, �' Chris Moehrl P �A v 7 952-937-5150 1 6 \ 2 L5, B1 Jackson L4, B2 Moline's Addition P� \V� Ex. R/W to be vacated. / Ex, Edge Bit_ �O 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Chanhassen 'RSF' Single Family Residential Zoning District J 15,000 sf I 90' (cul is 90' at 30' FSB) PUBLIC v 125' Max lot impervious 257 Front setback 30' (need var. for 25') Rear setback 30' Side setback U Front/rear ease. 10' Side ease. 4- Qa Remove ex. bituminous � H 2 00 Q 3 J o Ln w BOJ (restore with sod) o) 4N W o Lx i J cs WP CGS ,�,-�,., 6GS_ Ex, Lot 1, Block 1 Shiveley Addtion (48,818 sf original) Ex, impervious area Lot 1=8940 sf (18,27) Ex, House Bio i Tim Larkin BHS \ ` CGS \ i 50' R, R/W ` 45' R. B -C WP WP ,BHS BHS -- - B GS �^ WP WP - � 3 BHS % Q oQ, �� ►�- 30' R, B -C M \ �k \ u-) ail \ + CC) WP BHS \ cu - / — E P \ _ Ex S50' R/W Is W CGS �- 6N H cis i S 3S 4 50 R/W 5 31' B -B Ex. Dutlot A, Shiveley Addtion _.j Prop, CB Prop, CB 416.90 Ex, metal fence GV (by others) Ip (by others) (by others) Hyd/GV (by others) 1052,00/1047.00 CB (by others) Block 1 PROPOSED PINEHURST (43 Lots) Plowshares Dev el, pment LLC 0o Nathan Franzen o� 952-361-0832 --A 11/5/04 Prelim. Plat 13 o` Irl Engrg Westwood P ofessional Services Inc, �' Chris Moehrl P �A v 7 952-937-5150 1 6 \ 2 L5, B1 Jackson L4, B2 Moline's Addition P� \V� Ex. R/W to be vacated. / Ex, Edge Bit_ �O 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Chanhassen 'RSF' Single Family Residential Zoning District Min. tot area 15,000 sf Min. tot frontage 90' (cul is 90' at 30' FSB) PUBLIC Min. tot depth 125' Max lot impervious 257 Front setback 30' (need var. for 25') Rear setback 30' Side setback 10' (30' corner) Front/rear ease. 10' Side ease. 5' Ex, white privacy fence San, MH 12 (by others) 1066.00/1048.50/1048.40 (17.60') AQ�.O RPh < O s� Xo a A qV4p `si e< 13 ACJ Uj o \ J 1 3 Bock 2 PRELIM I ARY LANDSCAPE N❑TESi No. of replac ment trees required 29 trees (per calculation) Max. number o trees/species 1/3 of total Min. % of conif rs 20% Deciduous tree ize 2.5 ci avg.; 1.5 ci min. Coniferous tree ze 7' avg,; 6' min, Trees shall be fr m certified nursery stock as defined and contr fled by MN Statute 18,44-18,61, the Plant Pest Act, ZZ C❑MM❑N/B❑TANICA NAME CODE QTY, SIZE White Pine, Pinus strob s WP 9 8' BB Colorado Green Spruce icea pungens CGS 10 8' BB 2 Black Hills Spruce/Picea lauca densata BHS 10 8' BB J U1 - - - - F_ Z 6 / i3 Ex. 100' R/W - End prop, street/curb Q s V t BHS o_ ia. Q (10+36.89) df O C 4_ io W Remove ex. bituminous � H Z _n +1 (to future north curb line) J o Ln w BOJ (restore with sod) o) i - S�1 Lx d cs u, i �-Fti,�Jxnti ' o _� dQL D T P \= Future curb line (31' B -B) Qj N O (by others)— Future 50' R/W line 3 o u� 0 — — — — - — - — - — - — - — - i Ex�n. MH _ 10_70.83/165-5.32 -------- Ex. 22' bit. -- __ - Ex_Edc,�e Bit.- - _Ex__San, ----------- - - - - - (nQ O - - - - - - - - - CRESTVIEW DRIVE L DESIGNED PJX �\ CHECKED P.J.K -------------------------------------- -- - _ lxj �i v Ex. 40' R/W _ _ Future 50' R/W tine c Temp, street sign Future street centerline 3 (by Developer) 0 vv Li Min. two overstory trees required +1 a Abblett in the front yard of each tot, in addition to the trees shown. 0 i Y a o. X Ex, white privacy fence San, MH 12 (by others) 1066.00/1048.50/1048.40 (17.60') AQ�.O RPh < O s� Xo a A qV4p `si e< 13 ACJ Uj o \ J 1 3 Bock 2 PRELIM I ARY LANDSCAPE N❑TESi No. of replac ment trees required 29 trees (per calculation) Max. number o trees/species 1/3 of total Min. % of conif rs 20% Deciduous tree ize 2.5 ci avg.; 1.5 ci min. Coniferous tree ze 7' avg,; 6' min, Trees shall be fr m certified nursery stock as defined and contr fled by MN Statute 18,44-18,61, the Plant Pest Act, ZZ C❑MM❑N/B❑TANICA NAME CODE QTY, SIZE White Pine, Pinus strob s WP 9 8' BB Colorado Green Spruce icea pungens CGS 10 8' BB 2 Black Hills Spruce/Picea lauca densata BHS 10 8' BB J U1 c v F_ Z 6 3 r� V o c Q s V t Z Q Q, df O 1 3w W �L � H Z _n +1 a J o Ln L I Q W ��M o) i C) Q+' Qj � d cs u, 0) FW— o _� dQL D T >>> c c v F_ Q 6 3 ro o c Q O s y o o Q Q, df i 1 3w a a � H H J +1 3 J (� Z Ln L I Q V E i i D d v N N C a J dQL D T >>> Qj N O cj� a o u� 0 a o C�o (U aJ aJ DESIGNED PJX DRAWN H.A.L. CHECKED P.J.K W Q v F_ Q co U ro o c Q Z s y o o Q 0 __J 0 1 3w Eo-oo Z H H \ a J (� Z ~OC QJ L I Q V U U O O D C C N C a Y a D T N O a oi C C a o W Q F_ Q � U W Q Z Z Q H __J 1 3w 0 Z H H \ J (� Z W L I Q U U w x � a DATE 11/22/04 PROJECT Na. 04-108 SHEET NO. 5 1068- -1066- -1064 -1062 10 Hou L3, B1 leasant E x. Hous e o, I p64 � -----416.90' -- `----------------------------- — — — — — — — — — — Y L Baseline tree canopyy over area _ (Per Surveyor 10/04)o�e T; X ~ I / JR 16 `J 0i I p62 w m6 CD CD/ 384 389 1 JRPDP9 I ;RCW10 W Z Z R 11 L5, B1 L4, B2 Ex. House Moline's Addition a� 333 0 3 TRA14 16 ' link€n�'e cb B ock 1 PRE ED INEHU T �� U 3 N rn 2H, TRM12 Ex. 6' chain Nathan f� a zen ' LSI TREE PRESERVATI N PLAN I TRA12 J ;RBW12 ` / / 423 ' 25IX 129. U j "j�1 / 117\ 1 JRA10 L 394 RK -20 N / 415. 1 4 U U - Y U C I TRAEE _ / TRAIO \ / C SRP T % 248 I d 1 I \ -C �ti U / 452 W Z Z R 11 L5, B1 L4, B2 Ex. House Moline's Addition 1058 \_,/ \ TRA16 I TRA \ ' 360 I TRAIO \ / I T Y-10/TRA14 \-- 352 -358 -. I TRA10 / 353 TRAIO I \ � % 338 TRA10 TRAB j 144. 4 TRAIO =4- JRA i3 j _TRA10 / \ TRAIO ` ' 157T ' I TRHIC14 / \ y JI.TRA a� i 22A TRPDPI6 G (by othe s) roep, CB 3 I 476 16 ' link€n�'e cb B ock 1 PRE ED INEHU T �� SHEET 3 N rn 2H, TRM12 Ex. 6' chain Nathan f� a zen �w N TREE PRESERVATI N PLAN 10� 2 SHEET ;RBW12 25 / 423 ' 25IX 129. j "j�1 / 117\ 1 JRA10 Chris oe r( PE 394 RK -20 \ / / 415. 1 TRPDPI2 U U - 3 U � I TRAEE _ / I TRM14 \ / C SRP T % 248 I TRA9 1 I \ TREY �ti / 452 L_—_ -- _---= Ex. I TRPDP74 1 RP / 429 \\ / _ / I TR \`- RBB ('`' Q Ex. San. ----- a.---------------- -- 40 1 JRA14 \ /' 306 \�_/�� ------ TRS Ex. -.-...E) -•--------- ---- 1, Bloc.l1 ve Addti 46 TRS o — — — —— — '"/ CRESTVIEW DRIVE _ X — — — — / 424 2e (/ \ \_� \�� — Ex. 40' R/W ' 46 j TRE12 I TRAB i ,c` C%j �' 1 TRA16 }' 1060 -- _ .46 OI U I JR4 I \ R20 - X I V / W JRBLKW12 .__ _ — 48 � I TR R2-19 ' 383 o b v i - TRAIO 3 Ex. Ex, House v° Po l Ex. House I ' 374 w k / <B 1 TRAB _ /i 338 [� I ; ;RA R2 Paul wolf 1058 \_,/ \ TRA16 I TRA \ ' 360 I TRAIO \ / I T Y-10/TRA14 \-- 352 -358 -. I TRA10 / 353 TRAIO I \ � % 338 TRA10 TRAB j 144. 4 TRAIO =4- JRA i3 j _TRA10 / \ TRAIO ` ' 157T ' I TRHIC14 / \ y JI.TRA a� i 22A TRPDPI6 G (by othe s) roep, CB 3 I 476 cby thers) 3 ;RAI B ock 1 PRE ED INEHU T �� SHEET 3 N rn 2H, _ PRELIMINARY GRA ING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN/ Nathan f� a zen Z N TREE PRESERVATI N PLAN 10� 2 SHEET 952-361- 83 25 \ \TR ' 25IX 129. j "j�1 / 117\ 1 JRA10 Chris oe r( PE TRE14 RK -20 952-93 -5 50 R/W z Li U U ;RH1C9 10 I JRA12 a � o CD co 3 A % 15� ;RAID / 162, TRA12 ' sRE \o 'e na 1 TRAIO \b / 17RT TRAIO / Na" j TRAB 27 jTRAB 19. ' T A14 JRA10 I JRP1IPl4 E i 185. TRABIM i I TRPDPI2 _ 226 I ;RPDP16 ❑uttot A, Shi eley Addtio i 22A TRPDPI6 G (by othe s) roep, CB 416. Ex, met t fence I 476 cby thers) 3 GV �y others B ock 1 PRE ED INEHU T �� SHEET 3 N rn f�Q Plowshal's evelopment LLC _ PRELIMINARY GRA ING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN/ Nathan f� a zen Z N TREE PRESERVATI N PLAN 10� 2 SHEET 952-361- 83 25 \ \TR ' 25IX ` Engr.: Westw od Prof ssional Services Inc. JREB Chris oe r( PE / T47 RA RK -20 952-93 -5 50 R/W z Li U U Q/ L 3 � TREY C SRP T % 248 I TRA9 1 I \ TREY �ti Na" j TRAB 27 jTRAB 19. ' T A14 JRA10 I JRP1IPl4 E i 185. TRABIM i I TRPDPI2 _ 226 I ;RPDP16 ❑uttot A, Shi eley Addtio i 22A TRPDPI6 G (by othe s) roep, CB 416. Ex, met t fence I 476 cby thers) 3 GV �y others B ock 1 PRE ED INEHU T �� SHEET 3 N rn f�Q Plowshal's evelopment LLC _ PRELIMINARY GRA ING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN/ Nathan f� a zen Z N TREE PRESERVATI N PLAN 10� 2 SHEET 952-361- 83 Q\ Ex, Ed e Bit 1.1 04 P eli Plat V O Engr.: Westw od Prof ssional Services Inc. W Chris oe r( PE / T47 RA RK -20 952-93 -5 50 R/W 6 I I\ \ 2 I V INDEX = SRT I 476 EXISTING CONU TIONS PLAN 3 SHEET V TRA 15 SHEET 3 PRELIMINARY UTI ITY PLAN rn SHEET _ PRELIMINARY GRA ING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN/ � Z W TREE PRESERVATI N PLAN 10� 2 SHEET z Q\ Ex, Ed e Bit l� V O > Q F— W 1 I^ _ V J 61 / T47 RA RK -20 100' R/W Ex. R/W z Li U U Q/ L 3 � C SRP T 1 I \ I �ti L_—_ -- _---= Ex. R/W Ex. Sckn, MH Ex, 22' bit, -40' 3 — , 070 83/1 55.32 Ga --------- Ex. San. ----- a.---------------- - - /' 306 Ex. Edge Bit,CD -.-...E) -•--------- ---- TREID — — — — —— — '"/ CRESTVIEW DRIVE X — — — — W — Ex. 40' R/W - - 3?z o James Bixler 1 TRE16 +' 0/ \\ U O L O (4 - CL .a L CL 83 N IRPMP2-16 X W Ex, whl fence 10 San, MH 12 (by others) 1066.00/1048.50/1048.40 (17.60') 1p ° 1068 OA G� 1 C' V hP AZ rip Block 2 N v S� x0 10,100 \ hSJ C< A�J 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET RECENED SEN DEC 2 20fl4 �pcEEN pUAgNNING DEPT V INDEX = SRT Z EXISTING CONU TIONS PLAN 3 SHEET V PRELIMINARY PL T v i SHEET 3 PRELIMINARY UTI ITY PLAN rn SHEET _ PRELIMINARY GRA ING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN/ � Z W TREE PRESERVATI N PLAN 4 SHEET z Q\ a l� V O > Q F— W 1 I^ _ V J 61 cn Z F--1 LLJ Q 4 QL M z Li U U Q/ L 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET RECENED SEN DEC 2 20fl4 �pcEEN pUAgNNING DEPT 2 0 J DESIGNED SHEET INDEX H.A.L. SHEET 1 EXISTING CONU TIONS PLAN SHEET 2 PRELIMINARY PL T Z SHEET 3 PRELIMINARY UTI ITY PLAN z SHEET 4 PRELIMINARY GRA ING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN/ � Z TREE PRESERVATI N PLAN \ SHEET 5 PRELIMINARY LANDS APE PLAN 2 0 J DESIGNED P.J.K. DRAWN H.A.L. CHECKED P.J.K. w DATE 11/22/04 PROJECT NO. 04-108 SHEET NG. 1 SCANNED Q Q ^J^ I..L VJ Z � Ld z Q � Z a 3w 0 l� H Z > Q F— _ cn Z F--1 LLJ Q X CK _ Li U U w DATE 11/22/04 PROJECT NO. 04-108 SHEET NG. 1 SCANNED Hou 1068/ B1 -1066 / -1064 -1062 0 416_90' 10 Ex,\House leasant L4, B1 v U L --Y1---------------------- — — — — — — — d U b to Li o z 37 52,73 6' chain link fence L5, Bl L4, B2 --- I u 139,16 _—_ C- 30' 30' RSB__ _ _------ �F+ Ex. 1, Block 1 Shiveley Addti n i a CD L --- I CD 1060 I' 0 RSB - \\ U U I w i 17,680 sf \`�� 2 1 J x� a \ � J' o I \� 3 Z 49,100 sf I I o Po t Ex, House I W w Bio 1 Paul Wolf cql 1058 \` \x ��— -- Ld 01 `� �' 1 QI x J u of C MI 5.85FSB (Var) Iv o I / to I / `" C / 50' R, /W /� 45' R. -C / _ �^ Ex. Edge Bit. U I /a�2 a —I (11 <1 6 sf> 1g•5g rn� ��\\ i r--------- - - - - - I \ - 2 100' R/W Ex, R/W -- I I O I _ I I- OSG - JI /3 A` Li L__-- ------- \ \r \ z 22.56 2: 10, B 30' S' (697 sf) 4o B -C ,,D U M 15,000 sf / Z Min. lot frontage s 1 N% r n V Max impervious v° Front setback 30 Rear setback 11 m N Ex, House Moline's Addition -End prop. street/curb (10+32.02) Remove ex. bituminous (to future north curb line) J 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Chanhassen •RSF• U Min, tot area 15,000 sf / Z Min. lot frontage s 1 N% r n V Max impervious v° Front setback 30 Rear setback 30' Side setback ry ry (Aj Z Side ease. W QjLn CL >1�E4)o0 �o zQ Ln a 0 C (D a J Ln W M U U Q QjZ a 0 rn ti Q) U-) Q) W I I I> I 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Chanhassen •RSF• Singte Famity Residential Zoning District Min, tot area 15,000 sf Min, lot frontage 90' (cul is 90' at 30' FSB) PUBLIC Min. lot frontage 100' (cul is 100' at 30' FSB) PRIVATE Min. lot depth 125' Max impervious 25% Front setback 30 Rear setback 30' Side setback 10' (30' corner) Front/rear ease. 10' Side ease. 5' Eby others)— — Future 50' R/W line �- (Qcan ------ --- ---L �r— Ex, 40' R/W I x\ ,r/ r -,2S' �'� €_San, MH Ex, 22' bit, 3 - _----- --- -- \ rA 9 I--_4_ Fsg k I 1070,83770§53_ --- Ex. San, �o - - - - - - o---------- -- ------------------ -------------m Ex. Edge Bit K4 I � I kyr i I of 30 RSB ; 21,135 sF , A 0 J opp CB 416. Ex, met l fence (Io thers) GV y others ock 1 PR❑P�D ED P"INEHU T �� N Plowsharcys Tevelopment LLC \ oA Nathan F� a zen 952-361- 83 11/5/04 P eli , Plat Engrg Wes w od Prof' ssional Services Inc. Chris Moe I PE 952-93 -5 50 Y 3 60 R/W 31'1 B -B Z co 3 — —. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — CD ----__ CRESTVIEW DRIVE L° _ _ 5 — —N Ex. 40' R/W--------i' c Janes Bixler 0 +1 U u c o � a L +1 'a O� X \W Ex, wha-e--�fence San, MH 12 (by others) 1066,00/1048,50/1048.40 (17.60') Ao 1068� A / Future street centerline u v 1 Block 2 SITE DATA1 P.J.K Total site area 3.36 ac, No, of lots \ 101'@25% FSB 1.5 units/ac, Avg, lot size 24,074 sf Min, lot size 15,969 sf X412 - 6 o H Q o a t! c o 1 / ��/ I I W 0 >1�E4)o0 �o 4 I I N I I N I 0 C I iry W Q Ln U U I a ti ti I I I I> I I I I I CD IN --------------- - - - - - - I I---- 30' RSB ------- ----j 30' RS / 15,969 sf 16,486 sf E ❑utlot A, Shi eley Addtio 144.00 117.00 GV (by otl J opp CB 416. Ex, met l fence (Io thers) GV y others ock 1 PR❑P�D ED P"INEHU T �� N Plowsharcys Tevelopment LLC \ oA Nathan F� a zen 952-361- 83 11/5/04 P eli , Plat Engrg Wes w od Prof' ssional Services Inc. Chris Moe I PE 952-93 -5 50 Y 3 60 R/W 31'1 B -B Z co 3 — —. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — CD ----__ CRESTVIEW DRIVE L° _ _ 5 — —N Ex. 40' R/W--------i' c Janes Bixler 0 +1 U u c o � a L +1 'a O� X \W Ex, wha-e--�fence San, MH 12 (by others) 1066,00/1048,50/1048.40 (17.60') Ao 1068� A / Future street centerline u v 1 Block 2 SITE DATA1 P.J.K Total site area 3.36 ac, No, of lots 5 tots Density 1.5 units/ac, Avg, lot size 24,074 sf Min, lot size 15,969 sf X412 Z. t A DESIGNED P.J.K DRAWN H.A.L. CHECKED P,J.K o,c o o 0 CL 2 E.2 -0Q) 0 � a -C c W Z - - 6 o H Q o a t! c o 1 _ U 3w o TE W 0 >1�E4)o0 �o \ w 0 C (i z iry W Q v v ro N 0 ~ w i ti a DA TE 11/22/04 PROJO4Na 108 SHEET NO. 2J\ iCANNED J � 0, W Z z n/ H Q 1 F-11 3w W 0 1—I \ W (i z iry W Q U U ~ w i ti a DA TE 11/22/04 PROJO4Na 108 SHEET NO. 2J\ iCANNED 10 Ex�6'chain link fence `PT 11 ,,D W CD CD I< CD J 0 a U 0 W J Q v Q u c � Y 0 LSI c 3 0 S z � J( F— w w Z z F O F- 0 0 3 L3, B1 — _ 416.90' i Pleasant JHILL L4, Bl a U u �D XII 50' R. R 45' R. B -C �C- 309'-8" PVC WM Ex, Lot 1, Block 1 Shiveley Addtion Ex. House Bloc 8+ C) 65. 3 MH2 94'-8" San. .5% 1063.00/1050.50 (12,50') - �0 30' R. B -C 128 '8u 10�R 21 CBl 0��N / 1 \ Ex. 50 R/W o 4 Ex, ❑ut(ot A, Shiveley Addtio , Prop, CPProp, CB 416.90 Ex, metal fence (by others) ftaq-ewers) 1052.00/1047.00 Block 1 PROP❑ ED PINEHURST Plowshares eve(opment LLC (16.03') 5 GV (by others) GV (by others) - Nathan Era Zen 952-361-083 11/5/04 Preli Plat Engrg Westw od Professional Services Inc, Chris Moe rl PE 7 952-937-5 50 1 6 \ 2 1 In 0 @J d 00 03 CO 601 R/W 31' B -B s� 0 1� L5, B1 L4, B2 Moline's Addition Paul Wolf Ex. EdIge Bit_ _ _ _ _ 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Chanhassen 'RSF' C) Min, lot area 15,000 sf Min, lot frontage Z Min, tot frontage 3 O Min, lot depth 0 Max impervious 257 Front setback Z Rear setback Q) Side setback 10' (30' corner) � s Side ease, W Q LLJ V I I D z �Ln a O ��C>OJS CD W O � � u) MQU m L I �-I1S Jdtir' Z o 4 c� U v 72 Y W CTE E L .�- W 3 _- _�_ 0CL (b others) 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Chanhassen 'RSF' Single FamIty Residential Zoning District Min, lot area 15,000 sf Min, lot frontage 90' (cul is 90' at 30' FSB) PUBLIC Min, tot frontage 100' (cul Is 100' at 30' FSB) PRIVATE Min, lot depth 125' Max impervious 257 Front setback 30 Rear setback 30' Side setback 10' (30' corner) Front/rear ease, 10' Side ease, 5' 1 ' 100R/W Ex. R/W v End prop, street/curb 00 13 0 00 (10+32.02) H � I� Z o d a� 2 0 Z Remove ex, bituminous Q LLJ V I I D H (to future north curb line) Q J ��C>OJS CD o0To Q _ I �-I1S Jdtir' t CL= c N° C •- o 4 c� U v 72 Y CTE E L .�- Future curb line (31' B -B) 3 _- _�_ 0CL (b others) Future 50' R/W line 1 ------ 29/1049.19"C2fh7�'�_- ------ _y— — \ -------------------- Ex, 40' R/W o --- --- -�-- — Pain 1 -x.-�an.�iA----Future 8' ---- -- -- PVC WM---- - --- Ex, 22' bit, -- - ------ - ---- w - 1070.837Y0�532 Ex. San, o i -_ - - - - - -Ex,,-Edge Bit.- - - --- --------------roa - - - - - ------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - CRESTVIEW DRIVE `T :° x L i End Prop, 8" WM at 10+40 w/ GV Ex, 40' R/W c ' Future street centerline U v 3 0 0 James Bixler o� N 0 4 -a i a U) X w Ex, white privacy fence San. MH 12 (by others) 1066.00/1048,50/1048.40 (17,60') 1 Block 2 2 3 IDESIGNED P.J.K. DRAWN H.A.L. CHECKED P, J K. J Q v 00 0 00 o � H � L o o C Z o d a� 2 0 Z E,2 a Q LLJ V I y N H .s., N O Q J z LLJ o0To Q _ U U t CL= c N° C •- o 4 c� U v 72 Y CTE E L .�- � N 0CL t✓ t !_ N O 0 J Q ED 0 H W H z H Z H 3w Q LLJ V I H > Q _j z LLJ W Q Q _ U U w x DATE 11/22/04 PROJECT NO. 04-108 SHEET NO. 3 iCANNED Hous lvl�� Ex, House 1068leasant H l L4, B1 L3, Bl 10�g -1066 -1064 -1062 1064 416_90' � II o� Baseline tree canopy over area (Per Surveyor 10/047 o10 ;' JF I TRAIc 10 11 L5, B1 Ex. House Moline's Addition TREE PRESERVATION CALCULATION& Total site area 3.36 ac. Baseline canopy cover area 2.39 ac. (71,1% of total site) Non -canopy cover area 0.97 ac. (28.9% of total site) Canopy area to be removed 1.23 ac. U -`6 6 Ilnk en e / Co (to grading limit shown) TRM 12 Ex. chain o Canopy cover area remaining after grading L16 ac. (34,5% of total site) ' 40T \ TRBW12/ 423 (to grading limit shown) i' 994 415. 1 TRPOPI2 - I - -� o, Min. canopy cover required 1.55 ac. (46.07 of total site) TRA22 / I JRM14 \ / -- 435 --- I U (per City table @ 46%) 42S I TREfO _—_---� _� / 45 L ao6 It ; •TRPOPI4 425 _\�L_--- TR R28 ,Q Additional canopy cover required 0.39 ac. x 12 = 0,47 ac. = 20,473 sf 30 0 30 60 406 - R' �.�-- 46 10 Area of canopy cover/tree (per City) 1089 sf/tree / , — 43 \ TRS 201 J reE10 -'' - I _�0' RSB _ _ - f T�iq Ex, /1, Btocik Ve AGlc�tl I No, of landscape trees required 19 trees a SCALE IN FEET / -426 -" 424 • .J/ \ / 46D '••,�� 1/JRE12 1 JRAe ,RAl4 F Cf7 \ I JRA16 - 1 \\- I a ASSUME 0.50' CROWN (FIN, CL TO GUT / 384 / 388 106 — ��"' 1-1 LA 48 u I TRPOPB 1 TRCW10 \ — O/ —. - 1 TR R20. KWIC\ \,,o- (D \ TR R2-18 \\ -\ l0 I i o G�°a"9 J I �rTRA0\\ \ 3 7TRA4 - o Ex, Iri Ex, House o o Po l Ex, House Chanhassen 'RSF' Single Fanlly Residential Zoning District Min. lot area 15,000 sf �8 \ \�\` \' I 1 ` W B l 0 1 I \l TR R Paul Wolf 125' Mnx impervious 25% Fror-it s tbacK L+-1 Rear setback 30' Side setback 10' (30' corner) Li 10' 1 / W I TRA12 I 1058 ' W zQ� I Ex, whl fence J Vi_.,,� \__i "I , / b° San, �•� �� '� I I� (17.60') A o A N i Q) I \ 25' 1 V) Uj M Fs8 vQ 476 l..RNO TRA RIS3 RA10 2-10/ A14 50' R. ` / 45' R, -C � Z / �ti2 I h �a�3� \'\ ��\ 1°'72 ---- Ex -Edge Bit.. — — — - Chanhassen 'RSF' Single Fanlly Residential Zoning District Min. lot area 15,000 sf Min. lot frontage 90' (cul is 90' at 30' FSB) PUBLIC Min, lot frontage 100' (cul is 100' at 30' FSB) PRIVATE Min, lot depth 125' Mnx impervious 25% Fror-it s tbacK 30 Rear setback 30' Side setback 10' (30' corner) Front/rear ease, 10' Side ease. 5' U I� Cr V h� ° •s,. \• -.-._. 1 \ °b oy°o �p `� �! q / j ni 100' R/W Ex. R/W 0 .I l k �� eo End prop, street/curb � L \ _ -- _ - _J /3 \ '�X 1O 1- ---�-lo'a''b 1pbo3 � \ _.�• %p�'�% TRn •I\ 3 I (10+32,02) W n o Z \ '• �6 \ / —�� / i Remove ex, bituminous Z —� o po — 1 I (to future north curb line) — B ,,� N / s6 0 �3114� 1 I it �ti� OJ I ' 33R 0 —1L �1r\ k"6 Future curb line (31' B -B) --(6p�2/ (by others)--___- Future 50' R/W line n CB1 1LIZ 0. c3 JRHIg, _ \cP -r_ O 1d •-� . �, • N 1 _2 _L ti I ---- _ 21s, 1iso, \tel,�o� c:-�-----�...— — r---�. Ex. 40' R/W �---- - -- min s REB N - '�� - FSS 1 - I 0 07 83n. MH Ex, 22' bit. 3 °aQ 4 ` / - - _ I - - - - - o --- -- Ex, San \ o 4 9 \\ AIo °O 1 1/ 50'1 /W k 4r . RE2 1 306 -CQ I —=------_ - _— ----- £L ---------------Moa 54 0 ,: (0n'' /� 1 I 6 1 \ ITREe f Ex. Edge Blt —-------------- ' �q 1.. o �0 %� �6z 1 �I %-------------- CRESTVIEW DRIVE o _ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- v \ 1p Gar, 1 8,5 ti°6 9 x 1I \ - � �� SS / Gar. - 65,0 s I o _ _ - - - _ W W s TRA10 O I R� r'-'_.• _ Ex. 40' R/W -'— - - I i \ 1 2 3 Future street centerline U 0) I \ l3S RE \ J A 3 rI' 311\ / TR 4TRE10 U RWW34 6 _n II +ZRHI \� i l \� 1 I\ / /1 ' 3 'i TRA 10\Ieasc\ I j! TRP 4 1 1052 Y / "�` • I 1 I 0 0. In(a eQj �129, 'iR�ii' o ` A10 I _ . JRAIO /I 7R 14 -) i 0i �'i I 1 I a i Gradin .. Imlt/Sil ence I / 30 ( ;RAS r'� � ;R3PUP12 - 30' RS ---- 111. I - -` ' ,TRA ' 106 I /TRPSPI4 \\ / j / TRPDPI6 ' ` 10� / 103N I 1 TRA10 / E ❑Litlot A Shl eley Addtio \� i \ TRPSPl6 TRAP -16 \` TRA12 \\-' / 1'�„ / \ / G (by Jothe < Prop. CB Prop, CB (by others) others) 416.Ex. met'�l Pence \ 105 00/1047.00 GV try others Bock 1 PR❑ ❑ ED INEHU T Li , Plowsha�s eveloprlent LLC N Nathan F' a Zen 8 952-361- 83 �� 0 11/5/04 P eli , Plat Engr.: Wes w od Prof ssional Services Inc. Chris Moe rl PE 952-93 -5 50 ►a 0 �A 106 60R/w 28331'1 B -B 1 RPOP2-I6 , 1 Mock 2 2 1 1 V I James Bixler V1 qra, U P.J.K. . c fn v U I a i fl � iU o Q)Ln ' W zQ� i Ex, whl fence s Vi_.,,� b° San, MH 12 (by others) �'� 1066,00/1048.50/1048.40 (17.60') A o A 1068`\ 1 Mock 2 2 1 1 V P.J.K. IDESIGNED DRAWN V1 Z P.J.K. 3 N fn v U I fl � a N Q)Ln zQ� s Vi_.,,� b° 1 Mock 2 2 1 1 V P.J.K. IDESIGNED DRAWN s. Z P.J.K. 3 N fn v U I � a W Q)Ln zQ� a Vi_.,,� J W �'� Q� Q) QL) Ln Uj M a 00 00 C O 0 s 0 0 as c w z E o� o 6 yL.+d C 3 Of C o p � jJ 5 4 0 0" 0 m 0 U n�m 0 7 g E o Q) 0 0 — i 3"W(n d � Q IL O Z 0 Q U F— Z /�� VJ z oz z_ Lv Q Z Z 3 ILD LJ Q Ld 0 io�Q >Q > F- z Zw U H W J W LLJ W w n- ~ a DATE 11/22/04 PROJECT NO, 04-108 SHEET NO 4 SCANNED P.J.K. IDESIGNED DRAWN HAL. CHECKED P.J.K. a 00 00 C O 0 s 0 0 as c w z E o� o 6 yL.+d C 3 Of C o p � jJ 5 4 0 0" 0 m 0 U n�m 0 7 g E o Q) 0 0 — i 3"W(n d � Q IL O Z 0 Q U F— Z /�� VJ z oz z_ Lv Q Z Z 3 ILD LJ Q Ld 0 io�Q >Q > F- z Zw U H W J W LLJ W w n- ~ a DATE 11/22/04 PROJECT NO, 04-108 SHEET NO 4 SCANNED o; 10 Ex. 6'chain link fence `PT 11 CD CD J O 0 U W J q v q u C qjY W c 3 -d U Q � z E:1 w W z z H Pleasant lHill L3, B1 v 416,90' ------Y� W II Q, AL I 3 6 X L,1 0 o R❑ SM w ( �\ 0 Q) xx\ 50' R. R 45' R. B -C Ob x Prop. CB (by others) L4, Bl BHS -tz B H S Ex, Lot 1, Block 1 Shiveley Addtion 1 Ex, House Blo 1. SM AL BHS SM _ 3 rQ t \ _ -✓ 11 R❑ AL R❑ R❑ I 1 Ex, 50' R/W I I 1 I I / � 1 P. Gar, 1065.0 G Walkout 1056.5 Gar. 1068.5 G Walkout Bsmt. 1060.5 SM Ex. ❑utlot A, Shiveley Addtio 5 GV (by others) Prop. CB 416.90 Ex. metal fence (by others) 1052,00/1047,00 GV (by others) Block 1 PR❑P❑ ED PINEHURST Plowshares evelopment LLC mo-tlnarn bra zen 952-361-083 11/5/04 Preli Plat Engrg Westw od Professional Services Inc, Chris Moe 1 PE 7 952-937-5 50 1 6 \ 2 L5, B1 L4, B2 Motine's Addition Paul Wolf _ _ - Ex, Edge Bit_ _ _ _ - 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Chanhassen 'RSF' Single Family Residential Zoning District Min, tot area 15,000 sf Min. tot frontage 90' (cul is 90' at 30' FSB) PUBLIC Min. lot frontage 100' (cul is 100' at 30' FSB) PRIVATE Min, lot depth 125' Max impervious 257 Front setback 30 Rear setback 30' Side setback 10' (30' corner) Front/rear ease. 10' Side ease. 5' :1 60 R/W a 31'1 B -B N W Ex, white privacy fence San, MH 12 (by others) 1066.00/1048.50/1048,40 (17,60') A 0 O0 r V)\0 Z 7P� U � T In" 100' R/W Ex. R/W { End prop, street/curb H Z 0o � s A( po (10+32.02) H W Q WSJ C� I -I A 3 � Z clB s 3�, BHS i� 60 ' W Remove ex, bituminous � CQ S Q 0 No. of replac ment trees required 19 trees (per calculation) (to future north curb line) cr, Max. number o trees/species 1/3 of total Min, % of conif rs 20% Deciduous tree ize 2.5 ci avg.; 1,5 ci min. Coniferous tree ze 7' avg.; 6' min, I Trees shall be fr m certified nursery stock as Future curb line (31' B -B) ^ 3 _ -- (by others) Future 50 R/W line ________ ----- ---- _af ____-____-_--__________----_-__ Ex, 40' Sugar Maple/Acer sacc arum SM 5 2.5° BB --- - - - -�u� R/W RO 5 2.5" BB I - -E-x--Son, - MH Ex, 22' bit, 3 \ - I 1070.837�0�53� o---------_ -- Ex, San, -- �o uO� -- - Ex, Bit,- ----------------- - -- --------------- - --_tea �a s ------------- - CRESTVIEW DRIVE CD L° - -- --- -_ ------------------------------------------- - --------------------------------- + a X �v — — _ W Li i AL — Ex, 40' R/W - - Future street centerline U v SM James Bixler AL :1 60 R/W a 31'1 B -B N W Ex, white privacy fence San, MH 12 (by others) 1066.00/1048.50/1048,40 (17,60') A 0 O0 AQP 1 V)\0 Z 7P� U � T In" y�r�° Se x pD Block 2 { H Z 0o � s A( po < H W Q WSJ C� I -I A Z Q� � Z clB s 3�, PRELIMI ARY LANDSCAPE NOTESI 60 ' W �d-7� � CQ S Q 0 No. of replac ment trees required 19 trees (per calculation) V AQP 1 Z 7P� U � W y�r�° Se x pD Block 2 { H Z V � 1 3w A( po H W Q WSJ C� I -I - l- -17 Z Q� � Z A<J a PRELIMI ARY LANDSCAPE NOTESI 0- ' W o � CQ S Q 0 No. of replac ment trees required 19 trees (per calculation) V cr, Max. number o trees/species 1/3 of total Min, % of conif rs 20% Deciduous tree ize 2.5 ci avg.; 1,5 ci min. Coniferous tree ze 7' avg.; 6' min, Trees shall be fr m certified nursery stock as defined and contr lied by MN Statute 18,44-18.61, the Plant Pest Act. C❑MM❑N/BOTANICA NAME CODE QTY. SIZE Sugar Maple/Acer sacc arum SM 5 2.5° BB I Red ❑ak/Quercus rubra RO 5 2.5" BB American Linden/Tilia ame icana AL 5 2.5" BB \ Black Hills Spruce/Picea auca densata BHS 4 8' BB J U Z ED U � W Q S � (R V H Z � 1 3w Q H W (b Ln I -I - l- -17 Z Q� � Z W a 121� 121� 2 0- ' W o � CQ S Q 0 I V cr, 0) W W� Lu W DESIGNED P.J.K. DRAWN H.A.L. CHECKED P.J.K. w Q ED U 0 W Q Z Z H � 1 3w Q H I -I - l- -17 J � Z W W Q 121� 121� 2 0- U U w ti a DATE 11/22/04 PROJECT NO 04-108 SHEET Na. 5 SCANNED n kJRAv 5� w Oil, Mib ) Chanhassen 'RSF' Single Famity Residential Zoning District Min. tot area 15,000 sf Min. lot frontage 90' (cul is 90' at 30' FSB) PUBLIC Min, tot frontage 100' (c(:lt is 100' at 30' FSB) PRIVATE Min, tot depth 12-5' Max impervious 251 Front setback 30 Rear setback 30` Side setback 10' Front/rear ease, 10' Side ease. 5' 4211 C 1 JPAt2 ! t JRM11 \ 7g.16 ;' TPA14 r x J 1� R `- ' x. Lot 1, Block 1 Shlveley Ada tion "$ �0' RSB E _ -- i JR k aR.aee( _ JR/ie- / •�jta r/ \ '4 !e C"{) .ivrilb :+ cl f J 39. /' 388 17,6$Bj�g ! JRRORs ! TRCW10 '6a _�•� � --'/ JY8 \ , I 2LK+112 - al 73 _ JeA1a 1 a { U\11 �t j t TRA14 I _ O Ex,i f '� o c F. ' s X POV F 1' I j 3�. �r i Jaa16 RA12 L -f T' _. -.`•-`I \ ` f �'\ ( ..�� IOQ A) O \ JRR16.--\O }�/ H� �` 25' fSB CVq J J ' JRA1 •; i�SRAlO C7 i �!R4Vw IS - A Q)i /TRAIT / I 50- -e u ; JRA 33sL @2' �• tih _ _ (1056 _ E EdgeFit,^ _ - i ;U 1_ Op y .�, o IJl' R: k . i _._ !I JRA 3 t \ `3MH2 22.56A-7 -r 106'3.00/1050.50 r,) -4-, 30 _--�4 I i JRA10 .� f .� j / .b0 } . I / �__ qr) Ger 4a.. ,Rn �.}- J� s 21.53 SITE DATA, Total site area No. of togs Density Avg, lot size Min, tot size 3.36 ac: 5 lots 1,5 units/ac. 24,65? sf TREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONS 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET Total site area 3.36 ac. 1J1 --- - --- ------ _ --_ — --� i i W Baselir,F canopy cover area 1,97 ac, (58.61 of total site) Non-conopy cover area 1.39 ac, (41.41 Of total site) Canopy area to be removed 0,94 ac, W �::U) oj i C o L 0� D (to grading limit shown) M > Ln Z Canopy cover area remaining after grading 1.03 ac• (30.7% of total site) (to grading tir-,it shown` s DESIGNED PJK. DPA WN Min, canopy cover required 1.18 ac: (35.01 Of total site) Cper table @ 35%) Coa v -°avc P ov o I Z Additional. canopy cover required 0.15 ac. x 1.2 = 0.18 ac. Y Area of ;canopy cover/tree (per City> 1089 sf/tree 1 v > n No, of landscape trees required 8 trees d <� E� � y -End prop str et / r-I.;ri-) (10+32.02) Remove ex. *Ituminouc iii' to re^ ain to 3w,1� t 9. - - \ Future curb I ne i _:;i 'r -F' -__-_ (b Y others. 13T, ,raHlcl CR1 `%•�� ` q,',�( �' r_ ?5' i J�[D a' h�v ul E> , �' - - --'- E--40' R/W - - MH _ _ eD. i 1r \\\� 7 9 -- -^-' - -- - `ate t I- _'t;- �\ Ex. Sari. - ---------- - ---------- ifas X L! 104 i vhTRA10 -\/, ` / / t _ - - - - -. - -. - .- - F.� t 11 1 Tr Y _ v g4a J - - e Bf{ _ E r 2c' b,t l - Y 6� 1 ! 101 25 FS� ©�' \ 21a' "" z, �`' -_ - -- -- = --_ _ - ___ - - - _ C, \ _ Y c1i JRAII \ , _ - - - ---- ----.- .--- - .-----..---_.-.---- JR C3, �x v� r JRcc t,.�\R. P Future 8' PVC c ;S' ! �- _3RA12^ ao� r CRESTVIEW DRIV a� I r \ L Go - ua ---- �, 7 (� r_ �'j- -- ------ -------- -- - - L 'RAIU I X) ' Ua �6"' I - - - - _ __--.__ _____ _. __..__ _._.. ______ (:; r 1 i,5 i \ ��R,w _ 1 v j i i Prop. 50'-8" PVC WM stub. Ex40' R/W 7-4, y, :RAS a 1 �• JR1M31 [ JREI 0! 1'ix 'f I2; iRE10 CJ IA \\ - Ana I 3 I RMICII ` TRA O�� / -.�' ! t� h W tko t I \ vy / .Waf40oUt t `/ I t Jar T 14 ..�I - ., .V • �f^. 160 a��1�4vi { F ,'', JR o - s m t, 10 - i ( �' t;-• c i, n! I o y j . t- i TRA10 sQ F 11 L. Bsmt, 16656.5 14, o _ • «... _ . _ ...._ . _ •rano i --------------------- r. ' _ o J I I L 7tca------------�- - 16, T�a�n�_,_-=i _ - Gradin Lir7it/Silt Fe iCe'�6�P1� I + 21,135 sf I JRAe J z ! _ _ — x / 5 7 sf a1 I , i RPOPi - 7 jiii, 115,969 f �-`' i ioR1s1 17,67 50 R/ RPI ;PA YR E tl S et y Addtl JRAF-Is 14 ra�1RA3D ` ' UIt 5 i - JaAl2 , , , , , . ❑ of A, hi�i e o _ !Li ID - 0 -- 144.00 D_ 214 0� Ex. wait: � fence r acy 416.90". Ex, et ,. fence 141't, 1 I I +f^ Sart. MH (Joy Others) 1'Sn HYC� { `c 1017-t6149/1049,05/104895(17.24"/ Bock 1 \`� o � ;N �y C i Pro o s { 1I U p { r (by other ) LR Y N 13 { { W { { u off'. v } u19 l.3 1�r�4 12 PINEHURST (X LO Ptowshar es Development LC s \ Nathan Franzen I t ,; i 952-361 fi0832 i % i j I Block 2 i Engr.; Westwood Pro#e5 Tonal Services Inc. i ii=i C, Chris Moehrt PE 952-937-5150 5% y STREET� A 55' R, R/` 1 , CID I Pr p. San. MH18 10 9. 0/10.1.30 �s 1q4 14 U Z 1J1 --- - --- ------ _ --_ — --� i i W '^)w V V . Z � U Z QLr) a C l - I I U) Oz W �::U) oj i C o L 0� D q C,,LIJ M > Ln Z �7 - �-� s DESIGNED PJK. DPA WN His L. 7. U Z '^)w V V . Z � U Z QLr) a C � ZJ (:j` U) Oz W �::U) oj i C o L 0� D q C,,LIJ M > Ln Z �7 - �-� S DESIGNED PJK. DPA WN His L. CHECKED P _j• a a J w Coa v -°avc P ov o I Z ij m Wiz= � m o Y Fav 1 v > n ) O C d <� E� � y N Eta may. c° 1 71 M . I ° 43 L �,.w,i, v Q lau Q z W Q Z J F-- z LLJ a -W 0 U > z 0z [] W Q U Q� 7- U U W ti U yw d � 4 DATE 10/7/04 PAG -CC 7 NG. 04-108 sHFET NO 1