The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-04_T-MOBILE CELL TOWER - FILE 1 OF 2October 5, 2021 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Gloria Warrick US Bank National Association International Department 1420 Fifth Avenue. 9" Floor Seattle, WA 98101 Re: Letter of Credit No. SLCSSEA03084 (Original Amount: $82,500.00) T -Mobile Central LLC Site Plan Improvements Planning Case File No. 2007-04 Dear Ms. Warrick: Thank you for your time today to discuss the above -referenced outstanding letter of credit. As discussed, the City has not been able to locate the original letter of credit nor any amendment(s) so the attached copy has been provided. This letter is no longer needed and can be cancelled. I understand that it appears this letter of credit has expired from your system and is currently not active, and that any balance would have automatically been returned to your client's credit line. If you have any questions, please contact Senior Planning, Sharmeen Al-Jaff, at 952-227-1134. Sincerely. CITY OF CHANHASSEN YM Steckling Sr. Administrative Support ialist Encl. II SCANNED c: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director g: plan 2007 planning cues 07-04 t -mobile Ic release letter - Ic slcssea03094.docc PH 952.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 ;:zE 5 .'l'qL • DO BOX -�-NHASSEN - MANES, --a 553!7 embank. JANUARY 29, 2008 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD., P.O. BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 ATTN: SHARMEEN AL-JAFF o -7-o4 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT 1420 FIFTH AVENUE, 9TH FLOOR SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-344-2398 FAX: 206-344-5365 PLEASE FIND ATTACHED OUR ORIGINAL STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER SLCSSEA03084 IN FAVOR OF YOURSELVES, FOR THE ACCOUNT OF: T -MOBILE CENTRAL LLC 12920 S.E. 38TH STREET BELLEVUE, WA 98006 KINDLY ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THIS LETTER OF CREDIT TO THE ATTENTION OF OUR LETTER OF CREDIT DEPARTMENT, 1420 5TH AVENUE, 9TH FLOOR, SEATTLE, WA 98101, MENTIONING OUR REFERENCE NUMBER AS IT APPEARS ABOVE. TELEPHONE INQUIRIES CAN BE MADE TO EITHER JANET JOIREMAN AT 206-344-2398 OR GLORIA WARRICK AT 206-344-2328. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ------ INYERNATAONIAL DEPARTMENT Janet Joireman Asst. Vice President OF CHANHASSE" f y RECEIVED JAN 3 0 2008 CHANHASSEN PLANNING D=- i k7 ®dank. � U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT 1420 FIFTH AVENUE, 9TH FLOOR SEATTLE, WA 98101 U.S.A. PHONE: 206-344.2328 FAX: 206.344.5365 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT JANUARY 29, 2008 BENEFICIARY: APPLICANT: CITY OF CHANHASSEN T -MOBILE CENTRAL LLC 7700 MARKET BLVD., P.O. BOX 147 12920 SE 38T" ST., 9T" FLOOR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 BELLEVUE, WA 98008 ATTN: SHARMEEN AL-JAFF LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER: SLCSSEA03084 EXPIRY DATE: DECEMBER 31, 2008 AT: OUR COUNTERS PRESENTLY LOCATED AT 1420 FIFTH AVENUE, 9TH FLOOR, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, SEATTLE, WA 98101 ON OR BEFORE 5:00 P.M. AMOUNT: $82,500.00 NOT EXCEEDING EIGHTY TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND 001100 U.S. DOLLARS WE HEREBY ISSUE THIS IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT AVAILABLE BY YOUR DRAFT(S) DRAWN AT SIGHT ON U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AND ACCOMPANIED BY THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS: I. A NOTORIZED AFFADAVIT SIGNED BY AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BENEFICIARY REPRESENTING THAT T -MOBILE CENTRAL LLC HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS STATED IN THE SITE PLAN PERMIT NO. 2007-04 DATED NOVEMBER 26, 2007 AS AGREED TO BY THE BENEFICIARY AND APPLICANT AND REPRESENTING THAT THE EXPENSES ITIMIZED IN THE AFFIDAVIT WERE INCURRED BY THE BENEFICIARY FOR PAYMENT OF SUCH EXPENSES REQUIRED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AND T -MOBILE CENTRAL LLC IS TO REIMBURSE BENEFICIARY THEREFOR. 2. THIS ORIGINAL LETTER OF CREDIT INCLUDING ANY SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS. 3. COPY OF THE BENEFICIARY'S NOTICE TO THE APPLICANT THAT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED BY OCTOBER 15, 2008 AS REQUIRED BY THE SITE PLAN PERMIT NO. 2007-04 DATED NOVEMBER 26, 2007 AS AGREED TO BY THE BENEFICIARY AND APPLICANT AND THAT IF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT IS NOT COMPLETED WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE THE BENEFICIARY WILL ACT TO CAUSE THE PROJECT TO BE COMPLETED AND TO RECOVER THE COSTS THEREFOR BY REQUESTING A DRAW(S) UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT. 4. RECEIPT(S) EVIDENCING THE AMOUNT(S) THE BENEFICIARY PAID FOR COMPLETING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT WHICH AMOUNT(S) SHALL BE THE MAXIMUM DRAW ALLOWABLE UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT. PARTIAL DRAWINGS ALLOWED. ALL WRITTEN N OTIFICATION SHALL BE SENT VIA COURIER. DRAFTS DRAWN UNDER THIS CREDIT MUST BEAR THE CLAUSE: "DRAWN UNDER U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. SLCSSEA03084". THIS PAGE 1 FORMS AN INTEGRAL PART OF LEITER OF CREDIT NO. SLCSSEA03094 L'bank. THIS CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO'THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS" (2007 REVISION) INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PUBLICATION NO. 600". WE HEREBY ENGAGE WITH YOU THAT DRAFT(S) DRAWN AND/OR DOCUMENTS PRESENTED UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT WILL BE DULY HONORED UPON PRESENTATION TO US DRAFT(S) AND DOCUMENTS MUST BE PRESENTED TO OUR OFFICE AT U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, 1420 5' AVENUE, 9TM FLOOR, SEATTLE, WA 98101, IN PERSON, OR BY OVERNIGHT COURIER, ON OR BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION INTE NATIONAL BANKING DIVISION AUTHO ED SIGNATURE Janet Joiraman Asst. Vice PreZi_I_nt THIS PAGE 2 FORMS AN INTEGRAL PART OF LETTER OF CREDIT NO. SLCSSEAD3094 October 5. 2021 CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Commurory for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Gloria Warrick US Bank National Association International Department 1420 Fifth Avenue. 9' Floor Seattle. WA 98101 Re: Letter of Credit No. SLCSSEA03092 (Original Amount: 550.000.00) T -Mobile Central LLC Site Plan Revegetation Requirements Planning Case File No. 2007-04 Dear Ms. Warrick: Thank you for your time today to discuss the above -referenced outstanding letter of credit. As discussed, the City has not been able to locate the original letter of credit nor any amendment(s) so the attached copy has been provided. This letter is no longer needed and can be cancelled. I understand that it appears this letter of credit has expired from your system and is currently not active, and that any balance would have automatically been returned to your client's credit line. If you have any questions, please contact Senior Planning, Sharmeen Al-Jaff, at 952-227-1134. Sincerely. CITY OF CHANHASSEN <\?`�'►. Steckling Sr. Administrative Support Specialist Enclosure c: Kate Aanenson. Commul ih De%elopment Director g: plan 2007 planning cas 07.04 t -mol ile0c release letter - Ic slessea03092.doex L SCMNBD PH 951.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 'iHASSEN - MINNESOTA 55317 embank U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT 1420 FIFTH AVENUE, 9TH FLOOR SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-344-2398 FAX: 206-344-5365 FEBRUARY 12, 2008 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD., P.O. BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 ATTN: SHARMEEN AL-JAFF PLEASE FIND ATTACHED OUR ORIGINAL STANDBY SLCSSEA03092 IN FAVOR OF YOURSELVES, T -MOBILE CENTRAL LLC 12920 S.E. 38TH STREET BELLEVUE, WA 98006 LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER FOR THE ACCOUNT OF: KINDLY ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THIS LETTER OF CREDIT TO THE ATTENTION OF OUR LETTER OF CREDIT DEPARTMENT, 1420 5TH AVENUE, 9TH FLOOR, SEATTLE, WA 98101, MENTIONING OUR REFERENCE NUMBER AS IT APPEARS ABOVE. TELEPHONE INQUIRIES CAN BE MADE TO EITHER JANET JOIREMAN AT -246---344-4-346 344-4-34ri OR GLORIA WARRICK AT 206-344-2328. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Rhe ItPERNAT&ONAL DEPARTMENT Janet Joireman Asst. Vice Fresid:nnt L'bank. Fin SurSmis Guan�md� U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT 1420 FIFTH AVENUE, 9TH FLOOR SEATTLE, WA 98101 U.S.A. PHONE: 206.344-2328 FAX: 206.344.5365 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT FEBRUARY 12, 2008 BENEFICIARY: APPLICANT: CITY OF CHANHASSEN T -MOBILE CENTRAL LLC 7700 MARKET BLVD., P.O. BOX 147 12920 SE 30 ST., 9TH FLOOR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 BELLEVUE, WA 98008 ATTN: SHARMEEN AL-JAFF LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER: SLCSSEA03092 EXPIRY DATE: AUGUST 31, 2008 AT: OUR COUNTERS PRESENTLY LOCATED AT 1420 FIFTH AVENUE, 9TH FLOOR, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, SEATTLE, WA 98101 ON OR BEFORE 5:00 P.M. AMOUNT: 550,000.00 NOT EXCEEDING FIFTY THOUSAND AND 001100 U.S. DOLLARS WE HEREBY ISSUE THIS IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT AVAILABLE BY YOUR DRAFTS) DRAWN AT SIGHT ON U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AND ACCOMPANIED BY THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS: A NOTORIZED AFFADAVIT SIGNED BY AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BENEFICIARY REPRESENTING THAT T -MOBILE CENTRAL LLC HAS FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE REVEGETATION REQUIREMENTS (GRASS SEED AND TREE PLANTING) OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS STATED IN THE SITE PLAN PERMIT NO. 2007-04 DATED NOVEMBER 26, 2007 AS AGREED TO BY THE BENEFICIARY AND APPLICANT AND REPRESENTING THAT THE EXPENSES ITIMIZED IN THE AFFIDAVIT WERE INCURRED BY THE BENEFICIARY FOR PAYMENT OF SUCH EXPENSES REQUIRED FOR SUCH REVEGETATION REQUIREMENTS (GRASS SEED AND TREE PLANTING) OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AND T - MOBILE CENTRAL LLC IS TO REIMBURSE BENEFICIARY THEREFOR. 2. THIS ORIGINAL LETTER OF CREDIT INCLUDING ANY SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS. 3. COPY OF THE BENEFICIARY'S NOTICE TO THE APPLICANT THAT THE REVEGETATION REQUIREMENTS (GRASS SEED AND TREE PLANTING) OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED BY OCTOBER 15, 2008 AS REQUIRED BY THE SITE PLAN PERMIT NO. 2007-04 DATED NOVEMBER 26, 2007 AS AGREED TO BY THE BENEFICIARY AND APPLICANT AND THAT IF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT IS NOT COMPLETED WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE THE BENEFICIARY WILL ACT TO CAUSE THE REVEGETATION REQUIREMENTS (GRASS SEED AND TREE PLANTING) OF THE PROJECT TO BE COMPLETED AND TO RECOVER ITS COSTS THEREFOR BY REQUESTING A DRAWS) UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT. 4. RECEIPT(S) EVIDENCING THE AMOUNT(S) THE BENEFICIARY PAID FOR COMPLETING THE REVEGETATION REQUIREMENTS (GRASS SEED AND TREE PLANTING) OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT, WHICH AMOUNT(S) SHALL BE THE MAXIMUM DRAW ALLOWABLE UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT. PARTIAL DRAWINGS ALLOWED. ALL WRITTEN N OTIFICATION SHALL BE SENT VIA COURIER. THIS PAGE I FORMS AN INTEGRAL PART OF LITTER OF CREDIT NO. SLCSSEA03M embank. DRAFTS DRAWN UNDER THIS CREDIT MUST BEAR THE CLAUSE: "DRAWN UNDER U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. SLCSSEAWM0 . THIS CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO " 17HE UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS" (2007 REVISION) INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PUBLICATION NO. 600". WE HEREBY ENGAGE WITH YOU THAT DRAFT(S) DRAWN AND/OR DOCUMENTS PRESENTED UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT WILL BE DULY HONORED UPON PRESENTATION TO US DRAFT(S) AND DOCUMENTS MUST BE PRESENTED TO OUR OFFICE AT U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL DEPARTMENT, 1720 5n' AVENUE, 9n'FLOOR, SEATTLE, WA 99101, IN PERSON, OR BY OVERNIGHT COURIER, ON OR BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL BANKING DIVISION gL'cl.J- YlC/ 't-t.s RUTH ZED SIGNATURE Janct Joireman Asst. Vice: President THIS PAGE 2 FORMS AN INTEGRAL PART OF LETTER OF CREDIT NO. SLCSSEA03092 Steckling, Jean Subject: T -Mobile Site Plan 07-04 - Revegetation Requirements (Grass Seed & Tree Planting) Start Date: Monday, February 3, 2020 Due Date: Wednesday, June 1, 2022 Status: In Progress Percent Complete: 0% Total Work: 0 hours Actual Work: 0 hours Owner: Steckling, Jean Categories: Security LC #SLCSSEA03092 Expires 9/30/09 at 5:00 p.m. $10,000 (originally $50,000) **Do not release any monies until all outstanding items regarding Halla have been satisfied - check with Sharmeen first before releasing anything.** *Notify Sharmeen AI-Jaff 7/1/08 - Sharmeen, status? Kim 8/27/08 - Sharmeen, status? This LC expires 8/31/08. Kim 8/29/08 - Sharmeen sent email to Gloria Warrick at US Bank requesting extension to LC. Kim 10/2/08 - Received Amendment No. 1 extending LC expiration date to 12/31/08. Kim 10/1/08 - Per Jill revegetation is incomplete. Check status 6/15/09. 10/27/08 - Emailed Sharmeen requesting she ask for extension to LC. Kim 11/26/08 - Notified Sharmeen of impencing expiration. Check status 12/8/08. Kim 12/18/08 - Received Amendment No. 2 reducing LC to $10,000 and extending expiration date to 9/30/09. Kim 8/17/09 - Notified Sharmeen/Jill. 9/25/09 - Notified Sharmeen. Kim 12/15/09 - Notified Sharmeen. Kim 1/7/10 - Notified Sharmeen. Kim 3/1/10- Notified Sharmeen. Kim 4/1/10 - Notified Sharmeen. Per Sharmeen, hold LC due to illegal storage on the site. Check status 5/1/10. 5/1/10 - Notified Sharmeen. Kim 6/4/10 - Notified Sharmeen. Kim 11/18/10 - Notified Sharmeen. Kim 8/3/11- Per Sharmeen, check status 9/15/11. Kim 9/15/11- Notified Sharmeen. Kim 12/1/11 - Notified Sharmeen. Kim 8/1/12 - Notified Sharmeen. Kim 8/1/12 - Per Sharmeen hold for another year. Kim 8/1/13 - Notified Sharmeen. Kim Per Sharmeen hold for another year. 8/1/14 - Notified Sharmeen. Kim 9/18/14- Notified Sharmeen. Kim 6/1/15 -Notified Sharmeen. Kim 10/1/15 - Per Sharmeen check status 10/15/16. Kim 11/2/16 - Status check to Sharmeen. Jenny 11/17/16 - Per Sharmeen check status again 10/15/17. Jenny 4/24/17 - Sent Status Check to Sharmeen. Jenny 4/27/17 - Per Sharmeen - work on the site is incomplete, hold. Jenny 9/25/17 - Per Sharmeen hold. Jenny 2/4/19 - Sharmin, status? Halla cell tower. They are currently working on realigning the driveway per approved plans. Waiting for the snow to melt. Check back in spring/early summer. js 6/7/19 - Sharmin, status? js 2/3/20 - Per Sharmeen, hold for another year. 6/1/21 — Sharmeen, status? Js 6/30/21- 6/30/21— Per Sharmeen, she has not visited the site yet and when she does will need to bring George Bender with. Js 9/1/21— Status? Per Sharmeen, check back. js Conditional Use Permit Application T -Mobile USA Near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd January 19, 2007 CITU OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JAN 1 8 2007 CHANHASSEN PLANNIN00EPT Submitted by Steve Edwards 612-702-5065 • SCANNED • 0 Table of Contents 1 Table of Contents & Application 2 Application Cover Letter 3 Sec 20-109 / Sec 20-231 4 Search Ring Issued by RF Eng. 5 Propagation Maps 6 Memorandum From RF Concerning City Siren with Propagation Maps / One Mile Search Ring 7 Landlord Collocation Letter 8 Property Information and GIS Photos 9 Memorandum of Lease 10 Photo Simulations 1 Co -Location Letter 2 Photo of Ground Equipment 3 Construction Drawings 0 • • • •Mobile (set more from life January 12, 2007 Sharmeen Al-Jaff City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd 7700 Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Conditional Use Permit Application for a Telecommunications Facility to be Located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, Minnesota Dear Sharrneen AI-Jaff, 1 am submitting this letter on behalf of T -Mobile USA, which is applying for a Conditional Use Permit for its planned construction, operation, and maintenance of a communications tower facility to be located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 55318. This letter provides a general overview of the project, including its need and its • design. I. Contact Information Applicant T -Mobile USA 8000 West 78th Street Suite 400 Edina, MN 55439 Agent for Applicant Steve Edwards 501 50th Street West Minneapolis, MN 55419 Property Owner Donald Halla 10,000 Great Plains Blvd Chaska, MN 55318 • Agent for Property Owner Same as Applicant SCAd9E0 IL Location and Description of the Property The subject of the Conditional Use Permit application (the "Subject Property") is located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, Minnesota The plat name is Halla Maryanna Addition. The Subject Property is zoned Agricultural Estate District. The property is located west of Great Plains Blvd and north of Creekwood Drive. M. Proposed Use T -Mobile USA proposes erecting a 145' monopole to enhance T -Mobile's digital network nationwide and particularly, in the area of southern Chanhassen. Specifically, T - Mobile seeks to improve coverage along Pioneer Trail (Hwy 14), Flying Cloud Drive (Hwy 212) and Great Plains Blvd (Hwy 101) for current and future T -Mobile subscribers. In addition, T -Mobile USA intends to solicit other telecommunications carriers to locate their equipment on the proposed monopole. This will reduce the need for other towers in the area, while providing other carriers sufficient height on the proposed monopole to enhance their networks. Cingular Wireless has submitted a collocation application and requested to be added to T -Mobile's zoning drawings. I believe they are prepared to install on the tower once approved and an agreement has been worked out for their ground equipment. • IV. Proposed Tower The overall height of the proposed monopole will be 145' feet with a 4 -foot lightning rod. A monopole is a single shaft tower with no guyed wires, pursuant to zoning regulations; the monopole will be able to accommodate four (4) carriers. T -Mobile will have equipment at the base of the monopole (the "Facility"). The equipment will be enclosed by a six-foot chain link fence, with three (3) strands of barbed wire around the top for protection. There will be no advertising on the tower. Once the tower is constructed, vehicles will visit the site for maintenance purposes approximately once a month. The proposed Facility will be unmanned, and it will operate continuously. No sewer or water service is required for operation of the tower. V. Why and How This Location was Chosen A. Process for Developing a Site If T -Mobile believes that there may be a need to increase coverage in a particular area, its Radio Frequency (RF) Engineers first generate propagation studies using certain predication tools to determine whether there is a need for a cellular site in a specific area and how effectively a proposed cell site would provide coverage to a certain area. If, based on the propagation study, T -Mobile's RF engineers determine that there is a need for a new site, the RF engineers next identifies a Search Ring. A Search Ring is a geographic area in which potential sites may be located to effectuate the maximum • amount of coverage in a service -poor area. RF Engineers identify a Search Ring based on several criteria, including coverage and capacity needs, topography, and locations of other T -Mobile sites. SCANNED 0 After a Search Ring is identified, T -Mobile employs a site acquisition specialist to locate possible sites within the Search Ring. Typically, a site acquisition specialist first looks for potential collocation sites within the Search Rings, in order to minimize the cost of new construction and to meet the spirit and intent of local regulations that encourage collocation in order to minimize the number of towers in a jurisdiction If no suitable collocation sites can be identified within the Search Ring, the site acquisition specialist next looks at options for building a new tower which would meet the local regulations and provide the best location for future collocators, while also providing T -Mobile with the coverage and capacity needed in the area. B. Technical Reason for Developing a Site To address coverage needs, RF engineers separate the entire network into geographic cells or coverage areas. The size of each cell varies depends on demographics, terrain, and antenna limitations. At the center of each existing cell is a Base Transceiver Station (BTS). The BTS consists of the antennas, transmitters, receivers, power amplifiers, and signal processing hardware. Basically, the BTS is a network component that provides the connection between a user's mobile handset and either another mobile user's handset or the traditional wired network system in our homes and businesses. Wireless phones generally need to "see" a cell site for proper transmission and reception. Thus, all of these technologies are governed by line -of -sight limitations. The distance • between geographic cell sites differs greatly depending on the demographics. For instance, in highly populated areas, cell sites may need to be as close together as 1/8th of a mile; whereas in rural areas, the sites may be as much as 5 miles apart because a given site can handle a finite number of calls during peak hours. Thus, the more dense the surrounding population, the smaller the service area will be for a single site. Other factors to be considered in system design are the terrain, elevation, ground clutter, and foliage. C. Reason for Selecting the Subject Property near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd After generating a propagation study, T -Mobile's RF engineers identified a coverage and capacity need in the Great Plains Blvd area in November of 2005. The RF engineers then identified a Search Ring that would improve the coverage, assuming a suitable location could be identified. T -Mobile next asked a site acquisition agent to search the area for existing towers that could be utilized for collocation. When none were found, T -Mobile determined that a new tower would have to be built to provide coverage and capacity to the area. The location near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd was selected as the best location to meet the regulations of the City of Chanhassen and provide the best location for future collocators, while also providing T -Mobile with the coverage and capacity need in the area. D. Consumer and Wireless Technology • Today, there are more then 205 million wireless subscribers in the United States compared to just 24 million in 1994. Customers are taking advantage of cutting-edge wireless content and service that help people stay connected to family and friends. Many people are dropping their wire line phones altogether and using their wireless devices SCANNED 0 exclusively. Wireless phones and data devices allow consumers to do so much more then ever before. In addition to being vital personal and public safety tools, many wireless devices can new be used to send and receive e-mail and text messages, make purchase and even trick a user's location during an emergency. While T -Mobile and other wireless companies spend billions of dollars each year to improve wireless network quality and provide the best possible service, there is more work to be done and challenging obstacles to overcome. Coverage area must be improved and network capacity expanded to handle the growing number of calls and wireless data usage. T - Mobile and other companies are working to improve services where consumers are increasingly using their phone and data devices — at home and in their neighborhoods. E. Conclusion Since T -Mobile began developing its network in Minnesota in 1996, cell phones have become a necessity, and in recent years have began employ a growing number of applications, such as text messaging PDAs, email, photos, and video clips. With this new growth, the need for new telecommunication sites has grown as well. If approved, the proposed tower to be located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd will provide the Great Plains Blvd area with the quality of service T -Mobile's customers have come expect. Should you have any additional questions or if I can be of any assistance, please do not • hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, l 1---� tephen Ed Site Acquisition Specialist T -Mobile USA 612-702-5065 • SCANNED 0 Sec. 20-109. Applications. Application for a site plan review shall be made to the city planner on forms provided by the city and shall be fled 30 days in advance of the planning commission meeting at which it is to be considered. Incomplete or deficient applications shall not be scheduled for a meeting unless the community development director has determined that official action is warranted. The application shall also include: (1) Evidence of ownership or an interest in the property, The memorandum of Lease Agreement is included in the application. (2) The application fee, and Included with the application (3) Complete site plans, signed by a registered architect, civil engineer, landscape architect or other design professional, to include the following: Mike Hatchy, Saint Croix Engineering License Number 17852 (4) General: a. Name of project. A 1 P0902 Halla b. Name, address, and telephone number of applicant, engineer, and owner of record. . Designer— Chris Miller, T -Mobile Engineer— Mike Hatchy, Saint Croix Engineering c. Legal description (certificate of survey will be required). Halla Maryanna Addition Out lot A d. Date proposed, north arrow, engineering scale, number of sheets, name of drawer. Please see construction drawings e. Vicinity map showing relationship of the proposed development to surrounding streets, rights-of-way, easements and natural features. Please see Carver GIS Map included in the application f. Description of intended use of the site, buildings, and structures including type of occupancy and estimated occupancy load. Please see application cover letter, No building proposed, zero occupancy g. Existing zoning and land use. Agriculture Estate, No existing land use h. Tabulation box indicating: 1. Size of parcel in acres and square feet. 12.4 acres — Approximately 552,720sf 2. Gross floor area of each building. Not Applicable 3. Percent of site covered by building. Not Applicable — With tower and equipment less than 1 • 4. Percent of site covered by impervious surface. With tower and equipment less than 1% n U 5. Percent of site covered by parking area. Less then 1 6. Projected number of employees. Zero 7. Number of seats if intended use is a restaurant or place of assembly. Zero 8. Number of parking spaces required. One 9. Number of parking spaces provided including handicapped. Zero 10. Height of all buildings and structures and number of stories. Not Applicable 11. Breakdown of the building area allocated for specific uses, e.g., manufacturing, office, retail, showroom, warehouse, etc. Not Applicable (5) Site and building plan: a. Property line dimensions, location of all existing and proposed structures with distance from boundaries, distance between structures, building dimensions, and floor elevations. Please see construction drawings b. Grading and drainage plans showing existing natural features (topography, wetlands, vegetation, etc.), as well as proposed grade elevations and sedimentation and stormwater retention ponds. Plans shall include runoff and storage calculations for ten- year and 100 -year events. If stormwater is proposed to be routed to existing stormwater ponds, documentation shall be provided to demonstrate that the downstream pond is sufficient to accommodate the additional stormwater. Not Applicable c. All existing and proposed points of egress/ingress showing widths at property lines, turning radii abutting rights-of-way with indicated centerline, width, paving width, existing and proposed median cuts, and intersections of streets and driveways. Please see • construction drawings d. Vehicular circulation system showing location and dimension for all driveways, parking spaces, parking lot aisles, service roads, loading areas, fire lanes, emergency access (if necessary), public and private streets, alleys, sidewalks, bike paths, direction of traffic flow, and traffic -control devices. Please see construction drawings 11 e. Landscaping plan in accordance with the provisions of article XXV. Existing vegetation on the site exceeds standard landscaping, additional landscaping on construction drawings f. Location, access and screening detail of trash enclosures. Not Applicable g. Location and screening detail of rooftop equipment. Screening shall be provided from the perspective of a point six feet high at all adjacent property lines or from a distance of 250 feet, whichever is greater. Not Applicable h. Location and detail of signage including method of lighting, height, width, sign display area, etc Not Applicable i. Lighting location, style, mounting and photometncs. Not Applicable j. Building elevations from all directions indicating materials and colors. Interior floor plans may be required. Not Applicable k. Utility plan identifying size and direction of existing water and sewer lines, fire hydrants, distance of hydrant to proposed building. Not Applicable 0 I. List of proposed hazardous materials, use and storage. Not Applicable m. Proposed fire protection system. Not Applicable n. Such other information as may be required by the city. o. Photocomposite images, artistic renderings, or site elevations which depict the visual impact of the proposed development's design, landscaping, street layout, signage, pedestrian ways, lighting, buildings, or other details that affect land use within the city shall be submitted. Such images and renderings shall be from key vantage points and provide an undistorted perspective of the proposed development from abutting properties, less intensive land uses, and/or from entryway locations. Photorealistic imaging or renderings are the appropriate level of resolution. Please see photo simulations (6) Within the HC districts, the application shall also include: a. Building elevations from all directions, indicating materials, colors and landscaping at installation. Please see construction drawings b. Building and site views from Highway 5, the appropriate access boulevard (north or south of Highway 5), and any other appropriate arterial or collector roadways. Not Applicable • c. Site views showing the relationships of the proposed building or development to adjacent development, including buffered areas. Please see construction drawings d. Drawings of all significant or atypical site features, such as unusual landscaping, manmade water features other than retention ponds, outdoor sculpture, or other large- scale artwork and other uncommon constructs. Not Applicable e. Sample building materials. Please see photos included in the application f. Sample paving materials, upon the city's request. Not Applicable (7) Within the BCO district, the application shall also include: a. Identified boundaries of the primary zone and secondary zone on a drawing depicting existing conditions and on a site plan depicting the proposed development pattern. Please see construction drawings b. Calculations and/or drawings that identify the allowable density (number of units or building coverage) under this Code including lands lying in the primary and secondary zone. Calculation of allowable density shall specifically exclude lands classified as bluffs, floodplains and designated wetlands. Calculation of allowable impervious cover may include bluffs and floodplains but shall specifically exclude designated wetlands. Not Applicable (Ord. No. 119, 2-12-90; Ord. No. 203, § 2, 5-9-94; Ord. No. 212, § 4, 7-11-94, Ord. No. • 286, § 6, 12-14-98, Ord. No. 315, § 1, 3-26-01; Ord. No. 377, § 15, 5-24-04) C� Sec. 20.231. Application, public hearing, notice and procedure. The application, public hearing, public notice and procedure requirements for conditional use permits shall be the same as those for amendments as provided in article 11, division 2, except that the permit shall be issued on the affumative vote of a majority of the entire council. Although specific submissions required to complete an application for a conditional use permit may vary with the specific use and the district in which it is located, all applications for such permits must include at minimum a site plan that clearly illustrates the following: proposed land use building mapping and functions, circulation and parking areas, planting areas and treatment, sign locations and type, basic lighting concerns, the relationship of the proposed project to neighboring uses, environmental impacts and demand for municipal services. (Orel. No. 80, Art. IQ, § 2(3-2.2), 12-1586) • C SCANNED 0 • • Search Ring Issued by the RF Team I* M BWf CIM* Palk Rd \ Farm % `mvriiY+ l2' 6 Yrmmh f aWhr kc nmiers. ltl rirvlti �sxvM. iota In J`e p[ 272 Flying C.x.' 000 SCArlr+ED 1e To: Steve Edwards, Real Estate and Zoning, T -Mobile USA CC: Alan Roberts, RF Engineering Manager, T -Mobile USA From: Rajiv Parekh, RF Engineer, T -Mobile USA Date: 12/18/2006 Re: Candidate for AIP0902 Ring I reviewed the proposed Siren Pole at Bandimere Community Park. The site does not meet the coverage objective, at a height of 55 feet. Please continue your search for a site within the search ring, which will provide coverage to Hwy 14, Hwy 101 and Hwy 212. 1 have attached coverage plots of the proposed siren site. aPlease let me know if you have any questions. Rajiv 0 s carp r..c 00 One Mile Radius From Halla Site Chaska D c c c v 0 3 6 0 17 a L4 18 Lyman Blvd 404 12 andlor iK Riverside Park Rub}' Lake I 101 1st Ave 1s1 A 0 Property Information PID#: 253060020 Parcel Information Property Address: Taxpayer Information: NOT ON FILE DONALD E VALLA & SANDRA 1 CWAYNA HALLA 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA . MN 55318 Parcel Properties GIS Acres: 12.06 Homestead: N School District: 0112 Parcel Location Section: 25 Lot: Township: 116 Block: • Range: 023 Platname: HALLA MARYANNE ADDITION 0 E 0 Carver County GIS Mapping Application • Memorandum of Lease Assessor's Parcel Number. 253060020 Between Donald E Halla ("Landlord") and T -Mobile Central UC ('Tenant') A Site Lease with Option (the "Lease") by and between Donald E. Halla , a(n) individual ("Landlord") and T -Mobile Central LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company ('Tenant") was made regarding a portion of the following property: See Attached Exhibit "A" incorporated herein for all purposes The Option is for a tern of six (6) months after the Effective Date of the Lewc (as defined under the Lease) The Lease is for a term of five (5) years and will commence on the date as set forth in the Lease (the "Commencement Date") Tenant shall have the right to extend this Lease for three (3) additional and successive five-year terms. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have respectively executed this memorandum effective as of the date of the last party to sign LANDLORD: Donald E Halla By: 1-21 Printed Name: Donald E. Halla Its: / Date: • TENANT: T -Mobile Central LLC By: Printed Name: Hossein Sepehr Its: Director, En neeria/g and Operations Date: �17DS�/ tri 1 C� Sim Numkr'. AtP090'- Sim Nmne. Halla N,.ry at Mxrkn: M..... "Ii • /Notary block(�j(o�r lndividuall STATE OF 1 f \IJlt11P5;7 ) )ss COUNTY OF Qfo l-- This instrument was acknowledged before me on Dated: (© • •i STEPHEN MORRIS E[ Notary Public Minnesota My Cwmissim Exons Jams this space for notary stamp/seal) Site Number AIPM2 Sita Name: Halla Nursoy Rt Market Mi9,i=i wlis ITotary Public c Print Name SiIv commission • 1Notan block for Tenantl • 10 STATE OF ) ss COUNTY OF I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Hossein Sepehr is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Director, Engineering and Operations of T -Mobile Central LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Dated: _ I - 07 tN MAE STREETS Notary Public Mmnesola space for nola damn/wait Siic Nw.bc Al P0902 Sire Name'. Italia Nursery RL M.W Minaoana i Notary Public t/I�t PrintName cS�.l�/l'1 / ! X/PLJI[' My commission expires • EXHIBIT A Legal Description • The Property is legally described as Follows: Parcel Identification Number. R25.3060020 Section 25 Township 116 Range 023 Halla Maryanne Addition Out Lot A Site Nmaber: AIP0R02 4 sit*Lease Version 11005 Sne Nn , He0a NursM RL Marko Minnc fk as - 1 ,IT IF 1. or AL 2 ' R'V 1 Jt cR IL . .` } ice" n js*l. � r ✓ ��.A�} � 1 r] • • • •Mobikm (set tiuove f vom Jife Sharmeen AI-laff City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 RE: Co -location Opportunities Dear Sharrneen AI-Jaff, January 12, 2007 As a site acquisition agent for T -Mobile, 1 have been instructed to pursue collocation opportunities on existing towers whenever possible. In the case of monopole near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, I was unable to find a collocation opportunity on either an existing tower, water tower or roof top. • I did investigate the possibility of using the existing siren pole at Bandimere Community Park. T -Mobile look at it at the existing height, and with an extension of the pole by 25' which could be permitted by the City Council per the code, but the due to the lack of height and distance for the primary objectives it was determine not to be a viable candidate. A memorandum and propagation map have been provided by RF Engineer Rajiv Parekh concerning the candidate. Should you have any additional questions or if I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stephenlards Site Acquisition Specialist T -Mobile USA 612-702-5065 Gqp• irn — } L KA- � I S 1 ♦ ��jt a r ` _ i � iL I= ❑ Good Indoor Coveraqe ❑ Good OutdoorlPoor Indoor coveraqe 0 Bad outdoor & Indoor Coverage VA ♦ -agm Jam, A ww;7s !Il-1wP r-"qq1h/1; " Wr l 5 1 t I tMPS153PPPOPMOOMI I I the need to improving indoor coverage in the neighborhod around pioneer Trail. 0 } 14 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering MEMORANDUM Phone: 952 227,1160 TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager TYl OF FROM: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner CHMMSSEN 20, 2007. Fax 952.227.1110 DATE: April 9, 2007 7700 Market Boulevard Fax: 952.227.1110 PO Box 147 SUBJ: Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review to allow a Chanhassen, MN 55317 COMMISSION SUMMARY 145-foot Telecommunication Tower with a 4-foot lightning Administration rod and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a fence over 6'/2 p Phone: 952.227.1100 development. The Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 to approve the feet in height, T-Mobile USA — Planning Case No. 07-04 Ou,( Fax: 952.227.1110 Fax: 952 227,1110 agenda packet. Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and site plan approval for the Phone: 952 227,1160 construction of a 145 -foot monopole communication tower with a 4 -foot lightning Fax 952.2271170 rod and a conditional use permit for a 7 -foot high fence. The request was Finance reviewed and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on March Phone: 952.227 110 20, 2007. Fax 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation ACTION REQUIRED Phone: 952.227 1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 City Council approval requires a two-thirds vote of City Council present. Recreation Center Boulevard 2Pho Phone: 7.1400PLANNING Phone: 952.227.1400 COMMISSION SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.1404 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 20, 2007, to review the Planning a development. The Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 to approve the Natural Resourcesproposed Phone: 952.227.1130 proposed development. The summary and verbatim minutes are item la of this Fax: 952 227,1110 agenda packet. Public Works 1591 Park Road Some of the questions that were raised at the Planning Commission meeting Phone: 952.227.1300 included: Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior center • Can someone climb the up the cell tower? Phone: 952.227.1125 o There are climbing pegs that begin at approximately 20 to 25 feet above Fax: 952.2271110 ground. The climbing pegs are accessible by an extension ladder or a Web site cherry picker. www. achanhasseo.mn.us • Will there be a blinking light at the top of the tower? o The applicant currently has a letter from the FAA stating that at the current exact location with the proposed coordinates, they may erect the tower without a light. The applicant must re -file with the new position 25 feet west of the current location. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a Channing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Todd Gerhardt T -Mobile Cell Tower Planning Case 07-04 April 9, 2007 Page 2 Does the applicant have to use barbed wire? o This is an Agricultural Estate District. The use of barbed wire is permitted in this district. The applicant is using it as an added security measure. Can another user request to build another tower? o The City requires all applicants to look within a one -mile search area and provide proof that there is no other existing structure to locate an antenna on. Also, the city requires all tower owners to provide a letter of intent stating that they will allow other users to co - locate on a tower. How many antennas can be placed on the proposed tower? o The tower is designed to accommodate four users but the design can be adjusted to accommodate more. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the motions approving the site plan and conditional use permits to allow a 145 -foot Telecommunication Tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod and a conditional use permit to allow a fence over 61h feet in height beginning on page 12 of the staff report dated March 20, 2007 for Planning Case 07-04 for T -Mobile USA with conditions. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 20, 2007. g.Aplan\201Y7 planning crosV07-04 t-mbilftxecutive summatyAm 2 r STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review to allow a 145 -foot Telecommunication Tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a fence over 61/2 feet in height. LOCATION: Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, located west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course. APPLICANT: T -Mobile USA 8000 West 78th Street Suite 400 Edina, MN 55419 (612)702-5065 Contact: Stephen Edwards smedwards24@yahoo.com PRESENT ZONING: A-2, Agricultural Estate District 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Large Lot (2.5 Acre Minimum 1/10 acre outside of MUSA) ACREAGE: 12+ acres DENSITY: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Conditional use permit and site plan approval for the construction of a 145 foot monopole communication tower with a 4 foot lightning rod and a conditional use permit to allow a fence over 6�/2 feet in height. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi-judicial decision. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 2 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and site plan approval for the construction of a 145 -foot monopole communication tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod and a conditional use permit for a 7 -foot high fence. The tower is proposed to be situated south of Halla Nursery, west of Highway 101, north of Creekwood Drive and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course. SUBJECT PROPERTY A total of six directional antennas will be mounted in a triangular configuration at the top of the tower. The number of directional antennas has the potential of increasing up to twelve. Three equipment cabinets measuring approximately 6' high x 4' wide x 4' deep are proposed to be located within a fenced area at the base of the tower. The applicant is showing three potential future equipment cabinets in addition to the three proposed cabinets. Some landscaping is proposed around the fence. These plantings are added around the perimeter of the leased site to soften the look of the base of the tower and fence. There are also some existing mature trees. The tower will be placed among the stand of trees. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 3 The proposed chain link fence and three rows of barbed wire will have a total height of 7 feet. Barbed wire fences are permitted in Agricultural Estate Districts. The City Code requires all fences over 6%z feet in height to receive a conditional use permit. Access to the tower is provided via a driveway off of Creekwood Drive. Staff is recommending approval with conditions. BACKGROUND Halla Nursery is a legal non -conforming use located north of the subject site. In 1997, the City reached an agreement regarding the scope of Halla Nursery, "Stipulation for Entry of Judgment". It listed conditions for the continuation of the use as ordered by the court. The judgment included a list of existing buildings and uses. These buildings and uses were limited to the Halla Nursery site. Section 20-72 (a). of the City Code prohibits expansion of non -conforming uses. During review of the T -Mobile application, staff noticed storage of equipment and expanded parking area from the Halla Nursery onto Outlot A. This prompted staff to examine aerial photography of the subject site. The expansion took place between the years 2000 and 2002. Aerials from the year 2000 show trees and green space, while aerials from the year 2002 show expanded parking and storage of equipment. Staff is recommending the expansion be illuminated and the area restored to the limits of the parking area shown in the aerials from the Year 2000. Close up of Halla Nursery Expansion into Outlot A T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 4 GENERAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE PLAN The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and a site plan review to construct a 145 -foot monopole tower for wireless communication services and a 4 -foot lightning rod. The City's Zoning Ordinance allows telecommunication towers and antennas in Agricultural Estate Districts subject to the approval of a conditional use permit by the City Council. In reviewing conditional use permit requests, the Planning Commission must consider possible adverse affects of the use. The standards are: The City of Chanhassen finds it necessary for the promotion and preservation of the public health, safety, welfare, and aesthetics of the community that the construction, location, size, and maintenance of wireless telecommunication facilities be controlled. Further, the City finds: (1) Towers and antennas have a direct impact on, and a relationship to, the image of the community; (2) The manner of installation, location, and maintenance of towers and antennas affects the public health, safety, welfare, and aesthetics of the community; (3) A reasonable opportunity for the establishment of wireless telecommunication must be provided to serve residential and business needs, and; (4) Uncontrolled and unlimited towers and antennas adversely impact the image and aesthetics of the community and, thereby, undermine economic value and growth. The following constitutes our findings: A 145 -foot high tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod at this location should not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of surrounding property or substantially diminish property values, as the proposed tower is over 400 feet from any existing residence. It is separated by roads and existing vegetation. Further, the proposed tower should not endanger the public health or safety if the conditions attached to the permit and building code requirements are adhered to. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 5 In locating a telecommunication antenna, the applicant must demonstrate that the antenna cannot be accommodated on an existing or approved tower or building within a one mile search radius. Bandimere Park is located within the one mile radius and contains a fire siren pole. The pole is 35 feet high. The City is considering increasing the height of the pole. Staff asked the applicant to conduct a study that will determine how high the tower should be to meet the needs of T - Mobile coverage. The study concluded that the tower must have a height between 140 and 145 feet. The applicant is requesting approval to erect a monopole tower because there are no existing structures of adequate height in this portion of the City. They have a service deficiency covering this area of the City. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 6 Staff instructed the applicant to provide images showing the tower in the proposed location. The following are images prepared by the applicant: Image showing the tower from the Image showing the tower from the north looking south southeast looking northwest Image showing the tower from The west looking east City Code requires new antenna support structures to be designed to accommodate additional users. Providing opportunities for co -location is important if the total number of towers in the City is to be kept to a minimum. To ensure the possibility of co -location in the future, the applicant has submitted a letter of intent committing the tower owner to allow the shared use of the tower. The City also received a letter from Cingular confirming the intention to collocate on this tower. The applicant shall submit documentation at the time of building permit application showing the height above grade for all potential mounting positions for co -located antennas and the minimum separation distances between antennas. A description of the tower's capacity, T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 7 including the number and type of antennas that it can accommodate should also be provided. Additional antennas would be approved administratively through the building permit process. Accessory structures located with the tower include a pre -assembled base transceiver station (BTS) that would be located at the base of the tower. The BTS is a cabinet -type structure that contains the radio frequency transceivers, computer and climate control equipment, and batteries for back-up power. As additional directional antennas are needed, additional BTS will be required. The applicant is showing three proposed and three future cabinets to accommodate future expansion of the service. The cable that connects the BTS to the antennas runs inside the monopole. Staff finds that the applicant has met the general standards for all conditional uses and the design standards for towers. The applicant is proposing to erect a seven- foot high chain link fence with three rows of barbed wire around the tower and ground equipment. Any fence over 6'/z feet in height in the Agricultural Estate District is permitted as a conditional use. This will add to the security of the tower and accessory structures. Staff is recommending approval of the 7 -foot fence with conditions. To reduce the visual impacts of the tower on properties farther from the site, the tower color shall utilize the brand "Tnemac" and the color "Blue Elusion, and will contain no artificial lighting or signage. PARHING/INTERIOR CIRCULATION No parking is proposed. The plans show a vehicle turnaround area. The applicant expects one vehicle per month to visit the site for maintenance purposes. No parking is required by ordinance. ACCESS The applicant is proposing to enter the site from an existing field access point off of Creekwood Drive. The length of the driveway will exceed 800 feet. Staff is of the opinion that the entrance should be from the Nursery. This will shorten the length of the driveway substantially. The owner of the Nursery prefers a separate access for the tower than the Nursery. The driveway will be used to access the tower and equipment. The applicant has indicated that the site will generate one trip per month. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 8 HIGHWAY 101 The City of Chanhassen, in conjunction with Carver County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, has initiated a study to identify deficiencies and improvements necessary for a two-lane, 3.3 mile segment of the Highway 101 Corridor in Chanhassen. The project limits are Lyman Boulevard/County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 18 on the north and the Scott County Line on the south. The intersection of MN Highway 101 and Pioneer Trail/CSAH 14 has recently (2005) been widened and signalized. The objective of this study is to develop and evaluate alternatives to preserve the long-term safety, capacity, and mobility of the 3.3 mile MN Highway 101 Corridor in Chanhassen. Several alignments are being evaluated. For the purpose of this application, staff will focus on the section of the highway located immediately east of Outlot A (subject site). One of the alignments (which is the preferred alignment) moves the highway approximately 100 feet to the west of the existing alignment. The current proposed location of the tower is 150 feet west of existing Highway 101. The City Code allows tower to be located at distance half their height from a public right-of-way. This may result in a future non -conforming situation. Future preliminary engineering plans and detailed environmental studies will be completed for alternatives determined to be feasible (and reasonable) as a primary outcome of the study. The study will include recommendations for fiuther development of concept level improvements, project staging and E�risting _�liunenr estimated construction costs. The study will Potential New _Vigiunent o address tasks needed to refine roadway designs and determine appropriate future Federal, State, and local environmental review and permitting processes. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 9 LANDSCAPING The proposed telecommunications tower is situated among existing vegetation and attempts to reduce tree and vegetation removal as much as possible. Its placement will allow the majority of vegetation to remain and thereby help to screen the ground equipment and fence. The applicant has provided eight Black Hills spruce for landscape screening of the base. LIGHTING Lighting is not shown on the site plan. Towers shall not be illuminated by artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state authority for a particular tower. SIGNAGE The applicant has not shown any signage plans. No signage, advertising or identification of any kind intended to be visible from the ground or other structures is permitted, except applicable warning and equipment information signage required by the manufacturer or by Federal, State, or local authorities. GRADING/DRAINAGE Minimal grading is proposed. The proposed access will follow the existing grades. Some brush will be cleared to accommodate the driveway, tower and accessory equipment. MISCELLANEOUS The contractor shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. COMPLIANCE TABLE - IOP DISTRICT Ordinance Proposed Tower Height 150 feet 149 feet (including a 4 -foot lightning rod) Tower Setback N-150' E-75' N-150' E-150'* 5-150' W-150' 5-444' W-680' Variances Required None Highway 101 is proposed to be realigned. The preferred alignment will shift the highway approximately 100 feet closer to the tower. Section 20-1505. Setbacks. (4) of the city code states "Towers shall be set back from all planned public rights-of-way by a minimum distance equal to one-half of the height of the tower, including all antennas and attachments." Staff is recommending the tower be moved an additional 25 feet to the west. The tower will remain in conformance when the Highway is realigned. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 10 FINDINGS Site Plan Findings In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the City shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city s development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; C. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 11 Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the design requirements, the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, and the site plan review requirements. The site design is compatible with its surroundings. It is functional. Conditional Use Permit Findings When approving a conditional use permit, the City must determine the capability of a proposed development with existing and proposed uses. The general issuance standards of the conditional use Section 20-232, include the following 12 items: 1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. Finding: The proposed tower will provide a basic utility to the area. The fence will provide security. 2. Will be consistent with the objectives of the city s comprehensive plan and this chapter. Finding: The proposed use is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan and generally complies with city ordinance requirements. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. Finding: The proposed tower complies with city ordinance requirements. The lower portion of the tower including the equipment will be screened by vegetation. Staff is recommending the tower be painted a color that will allow it to blend into the sky. 4. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. Finding: The proposed tower will not be hazardous to existing or planned neighboring uses. 5. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. Finding: Will be served adequately by facilities and services provided by the persons responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. 6. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 12 Finding: Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. It will provide a necessary utility. 7. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. Finding: The proposed tower should not create conditions that are detrimental to persons property or the general welfare of the community. 8. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. Finding: The proposed development will not interfere with traffic circulation. 9. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. Finding: The proposed development will not destroy or damage natural, scenic, or historic features. 10. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area. Finding: The proposed tower will be aesthetically compatible with the area. 11. Will not depreciate surrounding property values. Finding: The proposed development should not depreciate surrounding property values. 12. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article. Finding: The proposed development will meet standards established for communication towers. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommends the Planning r -^....,,:,...t^^ City Council adopt the following motions: Site Plan Review "The PlafiFliflg COFRIPASSiOR fee8flifliefIdS appfflVal of the City Council approves Site Plan Review #07-04 for a 149 -foot telecommunication tower and a 7 -foot chain link fence with 3 rows of barbed wire as shown on the site plan received January 19, 2007, subject to the following conditions: T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 13 The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement and submit financial security to guarantee the improvements. 2. Clearing for the tower and equipment pad shall be no greater than 15 feet from the edge of the pad. 3. A maximum of 25 feet is allowed for clearing the access road to the site. Trees shall be preserved to the greatest extent possible. 4. The applicant shall install a minimum of eight Black Hills spruce around the equipment platform. Trees shall be at least six feet in height. 5. Site grading and vegetation removal shall be minimized to the greatest extent practical. If any excess material is anticipated to be generated as a result of access road construction, the disposal location must be approved in writing by City staff prior to road construction. 6. A rock construction entrance complying with the City's standard detail (#5301) shall be included on the Erosion and Grading Plan and shall be constructed prior to the remainder of the gravel road. 7. If applicable, the applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. (Watershed district and MPCA permits are necessary if the total disturbed area is in excess of 1.0 acres). 8. The monopolettower shall be moved 25 feet to the west for a total setback of 175 feet and maintain a minimum of 150 -foot setback from the north, west and south property lines. 9. The driveway off of Creekwood Drive may not be used to serve nor access the Halla Nursery commercial operation. 10. Building Official Conditions: a. A building permit is required to construct the tower and equipment platform; the tower must be designed for a wind load of 90 MPH for 3 seconds (ref. 2000 IBC, Sec. 1609) and include the effect of one-half inch of radial ice (ref. MSBC 1303.1800). b. The plans (tower and platform) must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota." Conditional Use Permit "The Planning G@mff&siea FeeeffHneads appreval of the City Council approves Conditional Use Permit #07-04 for a 149 -foot telecommunication tower and a 7 -foot chain link with 3 rows of barbed wire as shown on the site plan received January 19, 2007, subject to the following conditions: T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 14 1. The applicant shall enter into a conditional use permit agreement and submit financial security to guarantee the improvements. 2. The tower shall comply with the requirements in ARTICLE XXX. TOWERS AND ANTENNAS of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The tower shall not be illuminated by artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state authority for a particular tower. 4. No signage, advertising or identification of any kind intended to be visible from the ground or other structures is permitted, except applicable warning and equipment information signage required by the manufacturer or by Federal, State, or local authorities. 5. The applicant shall submit documentation at the time of building permit application showing the height above grade for all potential mounting positions for co -located antennas and the minimum separation distances between antennas. A description of the tower's capacity, including the number and type of antennas that can be accommodated should also be provided. 6. The monopole color shall be the brand "Tnemac" and the color "Blue Elusion" 7. All outdoor storage associated with the Halla Nursery and located within Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the tower and the area shall be revegetated." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Application. 3. Extension Letter dated February 6, 2007. 4. Letter from applicant. 5. Co -location letter from Don Halla dated September 12, 2006. 6. Letter from Cingular dated February 26, 2007. 7. Letter from MnDOT. 8. Affidavit of Mailing and Property Owners List. 9. Plans received January 19, 2007. gAplant2007 planning cases\07-04 t-mobil6staff report.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION " TN Application of T -Mobile for a Conditional Use Permit #2007-04 and Site Plan approval for a 145 -foot Telecommunication Tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod. On March 20, 2007, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of T -Mobile for a conditional use permit and site plan approval for the property legally described as Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, located west of Creat Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed conditional use and site plan that was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned A-2, Agricultural Estate District. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential Large Lot (2.5 Acre Minimum 1/10 acre outside of MUSA). 3. The legal description of the property is: Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition. 4. Section 20-232: a. Will not be detrimental to or enhance the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. b. Will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. f. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. h. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. j. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. Will not depreciate surrounding property values. I. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article. 5. Section 20-110: (a) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (b) Consistency with this division; (c) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; (d) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (e) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 2 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (f) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 6. The planning report #2007-04 dated March 20, 2007, prepared by Sharmin Al-Jaff, is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the conditional use permit. ADOP'T'ED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 20`s day of March, 2007. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman Planning Case No. O-� — v l CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Owner Name and Address: 53 Contact: Phone:95e?QNfa4 Fax: Email: NOTE: Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment .__4Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Interim Use Permit (IUP) Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development` Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements (VAC) Variance (VAR) Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Notification Sign — $200 Sign Plan Review (City to install and remove) X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attomey Cost" Site Plan Review (SPR)' -$50 CUP/SPRA/AC/VARNVAP/Metes 8 Bounds - $450 Minor SUB C k a u `t ZS c rii 1 t12_ 250 Subdivision* TOTAL FEE $ - So O An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notiFcation area WIN be invoked to the applicant prior to the public hearing. `Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/:" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 (•.tif) format. 'Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SUANNtU • PROJECT NAME: N ZrO�O tic\ (� LOCATION: _a�tY}Q[1�1f[4t��cins I�yrX LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (�D rcc nn TOTALACREAGE: WETLANDS PRESENT: YES NO PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATIC REASON FOR REQUEST: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or dearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title. Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. na a of I Dafte Signature of Fee Owner Dath G:tpLAMforms\Development Review Applic fion.DOC Rev. 12/05 SCANNED Sbarmeen AI-Jafi- City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd 77.00 Boa 147 C hantussm MN � 5317 February 6, 2007 Re: T Mobile CUP Application for the location near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd. Sharrneen, To allow the City of Chanhassen additional time to gather information concerning T Mobile's request for a 145' monopole to be located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, please remove T Mobile's application from the February 26'h City Council Agenda. T Mobile will request that the application be placed on the April 91h agenda, with a determination no later then April 13'h. Please let me know if you have any questions. leve Edwar s Site Acquisition Agent 612 702 5065 6-7-(Y+ SCANNED T • EMobile &et move f vrom life January 12, 2007 Sharmeen Al-Jaff City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd 7700 Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Conditional Use Permit Application for a Telecommunications Facility to be Located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, Minnesota Dear Sharmeen Al-Jaff, I am submitting this letter on behalf of T -Mobile USA, which is applying for a Conditional Use Permit for its planned construction, operation, and maintenance of a communications tower facility to be located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 55318. This letter provides a general overview of the project, including its need and its design. I. Contact Information Applicant T -Mobile USA 8000 West 78h Street Suite 400 Edina, MN 55439 Agent for Applicant Steve Edwards 5015& Street West Minneapolis, MN 55419 Property Owner Donald Halla 10,000 Great Plains Blvd Chaska, MN 55318 Agent for Property Owner Same as Applicant Il. Location and Description of the Property The subject of the Conditional Use Permit application (the "Subject Property") is located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, Minnesota. The plat name is Halla Maryanna Addition. The Subject Property is zoned Agricultural Estate District. The property is located west of Great Plains Blvd and north of Creekwood Drive. III. Proposed Use T -Mobile USA proposes erecting a 145' monopole to enhance T -Mobile's digital network nationwide and particularly, in the area of southern Chanhassen. Specifically, T - Mobile seeks to improve coverage along Pioneer Trail (Hwy 14), Flying Cloud Drive (Hwy 212) and Great Plains Blvd (Hwy 101) for current and future T -Mobile subscribers. In addition, T -Mobile USA intends to solicit other telecommunications carriers to locate their equipment on the proposed monopole. This will reduce the need for other towers in the area, while providing other carriers sufficient height on the proposed monopole to enhance their networks. Cingular Wireless has submitted a collocation application and requested to be added to T -Mobile's zoning drawings. I believe they are prepared to install on the tower once approved and an agreement has been worked out for their ground equipment. IV. Proposed Tower The overall height of the proposed monopole will be 145' feet with a 4 -foot lightning rod. A monopole is a single shaft tower with no guyed wires, pursuant to zoning regulations; the monopole will be able to accommodate four (4) carriers. T -Mobile will have equipment at the base of the monopole (the "Facility"). The equipment will be enclosed by a six-foot chain link fence, with three (3) strands of barbed wire around the top for protection. There will be no advertising on the tower. Once the tower is constructed, vehicles will visit the site for maintenance purposes approximately once a month. The proposed Facility will be unmanned, and it will operate continuously. No sewer or water service is required for operation of the tower. V. Why and How This Location was Chosen A. Process for Developing a Site If T -Mobile believes that there may be a need to increase coverage in a particular area, its Radio Frequency (RF) Engineers first generate propagation studies using certain predication tools to determine whether there is a need for a cellular site in a specific area and how effectively a proposed cell site would provide coverage to a certain area. If, based on the propagation study, T -Mobile's RF engineers determine that there is a need for a new site, the RF engineers next identifies a Search Ring. A Search Ring is a geographic area in which potential sites may be located to effectuate the maximum amount of coverage in a service -poor area. RF Engineers identify a Search Ring based on several criteria, including coverage and capacity needs, topography, and locations of other T -Mobile sites. After a Search Ring is identified, T -Mobile employs a site acquisition specialist to locate possible sites within the Search Ring. Typically, a site acquisition specialist first looks for potential collocation sites within the Search Rings, in order to minimize the cost of new construction and to meet the spirit and intent of local regulations that encourage collocation in order to minimize the number of towers in a jurisdiction. If no suitable collocation sites can be identified within the Search Ring, the site acquisition specialist next looks at options for building a new tower which would meet the local regulations and provide the best location for future collocators, while also providing T -Mobile with the coverage and capacity needed in the area. B. Technical Reason for Developing a Site To address coverage needs, RF engineers separate the entire network into geographic cells or coverage areas. The size of each cell varies depends on demographics, terrain, and antenna limitations. At the center of each existing cell is a Base Transceiver Station (BTS). The BTS consists of the antennas, transmitters, receivers, power amplifiers, and signal processing hardware. Basically, the BTS is a network component that provides the connection between a user's mobile handset and either another mobile user's handset or the traditional wired network system in our homes and businesses. Wireless phones generally need to "see" a cell site for proper transmission and reception. Thus, all of these technologies are governed by line -of -sight limitations. The distance between geographic cell sites differs greatly depending on the demographics. For instance, in highly populated areas, cell sites may need to be as close together as 1/80' of a mile; whereas in rural areas, the sites may be as much as 5 miles apart because a given site can handle a finite number of calls during peak hours. Thus, the more dense the surrounding population, the smaller the service area will be for a single site. Other factors to be considered in system design are the terrain, elevation, ground clutter, and foliage. C. Reason for Selecting the Subject Property near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd After generating a propagation study, T -Mobile's RF engineers identified a coverage and capacity need in the Great Plains Blvd area in November of 2005. The RF engineers then identified a Search Ring that would improve the coverage, assuming a suitable location could be identified. T -Mobile next asked a site acquisition agent to search the area for existing towers that could be utilized for collocation. When none were found, T -Mobile determined that a new tower would have to be built to provide coverage and capacity to the area. The location near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd was selected as the best location to meet the regulations of the City of Chanhassen and provide the best location for future collocators, while also providing T -Mobile with the coverage and capacity need in the area. D. Consumer and Wireless Technology Today, there are more then 205 million wireless subscribers in the United States compared to just 24 million in 1994. Customers are taking advantage of cutting-edge wireless content and service that help people stay connected to family and friends. Many people are dropping their wire line phones altogether and using their wireless devices exclusively. Wireless phones and data devices allow consumers to do so much more then ever before. In addition to being vital personal and public safety tools, many wireless devices can new be used to send and receive e-mail and text messages, make purchase and even track a user's location during an emergency. While T -Mobile and other wireless companies spend billions of dollars each year to improve wireless network quality and provide the best possible service, there is more work to be done and challenging obstacles to overcome. Coverage area must be improved and network capacity expanded to handle the growing number of calls and wireless data usage. T - Mobile and other companies are working to improve services where consumers are increasingly using their phone and data devices — at home and in their neighborhoods. E. Conclusion Since T -Mobile began developing its network in Minnesota in 1996, cell phones have become a necessity, and in recent years have began employ a growing number of applications, such as text messaging PDAs, email, photos, and video clips. With this new growth, the need for new telecommunication sites has grown as well. If approved, the proposed tower to be located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd will provide the Great Plains Blvd area with the quality of service T -Mobile's customers have come expect. Should you have any additional questions or if I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stephen Edwards Site Acquisition Specialist T -Mobile USA 612-702-5065 Sec. 20-109. Applications. Application for a site plan review shall be made to the city planner on forms provided by the city and shall be filed 30 days in advance of the planning commission meeting at which it is to be considered. Incomplete or deficient applications shall not be scheduled for a meeting unless the community development director has determined that official action is warranted. The application shall also include: (1) Evidence of ownership or an interest in the property; The memorandum of Lease Agreement is included in the application. (2) The application fee; and Included with the application (3) Complete site plans, signed by a registered architect, civil engineer, landscape architect or other design professional, to include the following: Mike Hatchy, Saint Croix Engineering License Number 17852 (4) General: a. Name of project. AlP0902 Halla b. Name, address, and telephone number of applicant, engineer, and owner of record. Designer— Chris Miller, T -Mobile Engineer— Mike Hatchy, Saint Croix Engineering c. Legal description (certificate of survey will be required). Halla Maryanna Addition Out lot A d. Date proposed, north arrow, engineering scale, number of sheets, name of drawer. Please see construction drawings e. Vicinity map showing relationship of the proposed development to surrounding streets, rights-of-way, easements and natural features. Please see Carver GIS Map included in the application f. Description of intended use of the site, buildings, and structures including type of occupancy and estimated occupancy load. Please see application cover letter, No building proposed, zero occupancy g. Existing zoning and land use. Agriculture Estate, No existing land use h. Tabulation box indicating: 1. Size of parcel in acres and square feet. 12.4 acres — Approximately 552, 720sf 2. Gross floor area of each building. Not Applicable 3. Percent of site covered by building. Not Applicable — With tower and equipment less than 1 4. Percent of site covered by impervious surface. With tower and equipment less than 1% 5. Percent of site covered by parking area. Less then 1% 6. Projected number of employees. Zero 7. Number of seats if intended use is a restaurant or place of assembly. Zero 8. Number of parking spaces required. One 9. Number of parking spaces provided including handicapped. Zero 10. Height of all buildings and structures and number of stories. Not Applicable 11. Breakdown of the building area allocated for specific uses, e.g., manufacturing, office, retail, showroom, warehouse, etc. Not Applicable (5) Site and building plan: a. Property line dimensions, location of all existing and proposed structures with distance from boundaries, distance between structures, building dimensions, and floor elevations. Please see construction drawings b. Grading and drainage plans showing existing natural features (topography, wetlands, vegetation, etc.), as well as proposed grade elevations and sedimentation and stormwater retention ponds. Plans shall include runoff and storage calculations for ten- year and 100 -year events. If stormwater is proposed to be routed to existing stormwater ponds, documentation shall be provided to demonstrate that the downstream pond is sufficient to accommodate the additional stormwater. Not Applicable c. All existing and proposed points of egress/ingress showing widths at property lines, turning radii abutting rights-of-way with indicated centerline, width, paving width, existing and proposed median cuts, and intersections of streets and driveways. Please see construction drawings d. Vehicular circulation system showing location and dimension for all driveways, parking spaces, parking lot aisles, service roads, loading areas, fire lanes, emergency access (if necessary), public and private streets, alleys, sidewalks, bike paths, direction of traffic flow, and traffic -control devices. Please see construction drawings e. Landscaping plan in accordance with the provisions of article XXV. Existing vegetation on the site exceeds standard landscaping, additional landscaping on construction drawings f. Location, access and screening detail of trash enclosures. Not Applicable g. Location and screening detail of rooftop equipment. Screening shall be provided from the perspective of a point six feet high at all adjacent property lines or from a distance of 250 feet, whichever is greater. Not Applicable h. Location and detail of signage including method of lighting, height, width, sign display area, etc. Not Applicable i. Lighting location, style, mounting and photometrics. Not Applicable j. Building elevations from all directions indicating materials and colors. Interior floor plans may be required. Not Applicable k. Utility plan identifying size and direction of existing water and sewer lines, fire hydrants, distance of hydrant to proposed building. Not Applicable I. List of proposed hazardous materials, use and storage. Not Applicable m. Proposed fire protection system. Not Applicable n. Such other information as may be required by the city. o. Photocomposite images, artistic renderings, or site elevations which depict the visual impact of the proposed development's design, landscaping, street layout, signage, pedestrian ways, lighting, buildings, or other details that affect land use within the city shall be submitted. Such images and renderings shall be from key vantage points and provide an undistorted perspective of the proposed development from abutting properties, less intensive land uses, and/or from entryway locations. Photorealistic imaging or renderings are the appropriate level of resolution. Please see photo simulations (6) Within the HC districts, the application shall also include: a. Building elevations from all directions, indicating materials, colors and landscaping at installation. Please see construction drawings b. Building and site views from Highway 5, the appropriate access boulevard (north or south of Highway 5), and any other appropriate arterial or collector roadways. Not Applicable c. Site views showing the relationships of the proposed building or development to adjacent development, including buffered areas. Please see construction drawings d. Drawings of all significant or atypical site features, such as unusual landscaping, manmade water features other than retention ponds, outdoor sculpture, or other large- scale artwork and other uncommon constructs. Not Applicable e. Sample building materials. Please see photos included in the application f. Sample paving materials, upon the city's request. Not Applicable (7) Within the BCO district, the application shall also include: a. Identified boundaries of the primary zone and secondary zone on a drawing depicting existing conditions and on a site plan depicting the proposed development pattern. Please see construction drawings b. Calculations and/or drawings that identify the allowable density (number of units or building coverage) under this Code including lands lying in the primary and secondary zone. Calculation of allowable density shall specifically exclude lands classed as bluffs, floodplains and designated wetlands. Calculation of allowable impervious cover may include bluffs and floodplains but shall specifically exclude designated wetlands. Not Applicable (Ord. No. 119, 2-12-90; Ord. No. 203, § 2, 5-9-94; Ord. No. 212, § 4, 7-11-94; Ord. No. 286, § 6, 12-14-98; Ord. No. 315, § 1, 3-26-01; Ord. No. 377, § 15, 5-24-04) ❑ Good Indoor Coverage ❑ Good Outdoor/Poor Indoor coverage ❑ Bad outdoor & Indoor Coverage 1P00t?4 J Shows location of both the candidates E K, 7 ❑ Good Indoor Coverage ❑ Good OutdooriPoor Indoor coveraue Location of the siren pole is in the decent outdoor coverage area, and with the height we can get with the siren pole replacement we can achieve marginal of what our objective is in this area as you can see area south of the siren pole around pioneer trail is still left uncovered. E ® Good Indoor Coverage ❑ Good OutdoorfPoor Indoor coverage ❑ Bad outdoor & Indoor Coverage �1 This shows the need to improving indoor coverage in the neighborhod around pioneer Trail. • Good Indoor Coverage El Good Outdoor/Poor Indoor coverage 5 ❑ Bad outdoor & Indoor Coverage li ► r • - - A•1 Yy�X9A w f IA 1!'UUU•IIt III! �!t As shown in the coverage plot with our current location at Halla Nursery we can cover larger area, thereby addressing our coverage objective better. 0 i1 U September 12, 2006 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 RE: Cellular Tower Co -location / Letter of Intent City of Chanhassen, I have been working with T -Mobile on the placement of a 150' monopole on my property located along Great Plains Blvd; T -Mobile calls the project AIP902. This tower is being constructed to allow for (3) three additional carriers in addition to T -Mobile. From what I understand Cingular is interested in installing on the tower. I intend to allow additional co -locators to install on the tower after entering into a lease for the ground space. Should you have any additional questions or if I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. SincFrelY1 l tet'' Don HaiTa 952-445-6555 St. Stephens SCANNED singular February 26, 2007 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 To whom it may concern: This letter is to confirm it is Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("Cingular Wireless") intention to collocate on the communication tower that T -Mobile is proposing to build on the Halla Nursery property in Chanhassen, MN. A collocation application was submitted to T -Mobile for this purpose back in 2006. Please don't hesitate to call should you need any additional information. Sincerely, Jason Hall Site Acquisition (On behalf of Cingular Wireless) Tele: 612.670.0101 oanw Minnesota Department of Transportation MFIECEIV etropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113-3174 February 12, 2007 Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: T -Mobile Cell Tower site plan and conditional use permit Mn/DOT Review # S 07-009 FEB 14 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Northwest quadrant of Trunk Highway (TH) 101 (Great Plains Blvd.) and Creekwood Drive City of Chanhassan/Carver County Control Section 1009 Dear Ms. Al-Jaff: Thank you for the opportunity to review the above -referenced site plan and conditional use permit application. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) Metro District has reviewed the above -referenced plan. Before any further development, please address the following comments: Preservation of future highway right-of-way: Mn/DOT, Carver County, and the City of Chanhassen have been working on a TH 101 Scoping Study (covering Lyman Blvd. south to TH 212) for the last nine months (State Project # SP 1009-18). The purpose of the study is to identify a corridor location for a future TH 101 that includes safety improvements and additional capacity. Completing the study and officially mapping the corridor will allow the City to plan around this future corridor. The Scoping Study analyzed four different conceptual alignments and weighed the relative transportation benefits, potential environmental impacts (on a screening level) and costs. A Central alignment has been selected as the preferred alternative. This alternative primarily follows the existing alignment. The proposed cell phone tower site location is adjacent to this preferred alternative. It would be in the developer's and City's best interest to move the proposed T -Mobile cell tower and the future Cingular lease area as far west as feasible. This will increase the `blear zone" for the future improved TH 101 when that highway is constructed on the Central alignment. Environmental and historical constraints were identified on the east side of existing TH 101 as part of the Scoping Study. Moving TH 101 to the east will not be an option. For questions on these points, please call Diane Langenbach, Mn/DOT Metro District South Area, at (651) 582-1468. An equal opportunity employer Drainage. A drainage permit may be required. The proposed development will need to maintain existing drainage rates (i.e., the rate at which storm water is discharged from the site must not increase). The City or project developer will need to submit existing / proposed hydraulic computations for both 10 and 100 year rainfall events verifying that all existing drainage patterns and systems affecting Mn/DOT right of way will be perpetuated. Mn/DOT needs to be able to determine the change in discharge to the TH 101 right-of- way after the construction required for the cell tower. There is an eighteen inch (18) corrugated metal pipe under TH 101 that this site appears to flow to. Please provide drainage area maps, with arrows indicating direction of the flows. Discharge to the TH 101 right-of-way must not increase. Any work impacting Mn/DOT right-of-way will require a permit. For questions on these points, please call Derek Beauduy, Mn/DOT Metro District Water Resources Engineering, at (651) 634-2080, or e-mail him at derek.beauduy@dot.state.mn.us. Permits.- As ermits. As mentioned above, a drainage permit may be required. Any work impacting MnDOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsup/utility. Please include one full-size plan set, and a I 1 x 17 inch plan set for each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's 30 -day review and response process to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at (651)582-1462. Sincerely, Mary McNeff kW Transportation Planner Copy: John Freemyer, Carver County Surveyor, Cologne, MN Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer, Cologne, MN Dave Drealan, Planning Department, Carver County, Chaska, MN Steve Edwards, T -Mobile USA, Minneapolis, MN CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on March 8, 2007, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for the T -Mobile Cell Tower — Planning Case 07-04 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this W" day of naarc_4 2007. Wj KIM I MEUWISSEN otary Public -Minnesota Commission Expires Jen 37, 2010 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit Proposal: for the construction of a 145 -foot cell tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod and to allow a fence over 6Y2 feet in height Applicant: T -Mobile West of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, Property south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course Location: (Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition) A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/07-04.html. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen Questions & AI-Jaff by email at sal6aff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone Comments: at 952-227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it Comments: is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request, At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciaUndustdal, • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersontrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included In the re ort lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: Citv Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit Proposal: for the construction of a 145 -foot cell tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod, and to allow a fence over 6'/2 feet in height Applicant: T -Mobile West of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, Property south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course Location: (Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition) A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/07-04.htmI. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff by email at saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone Questions & at 952-227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it Comments: is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the PlanningCommission meeting. Ciry Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council, The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommentlation, Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciavindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519,99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. It you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. This map is neither a legally recorded rrpp nor a survey and is not intended to be used as ane. TMs map is a compilation of records, information and data located in venous city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the at" shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Inforrhaticn System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the Cry does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227.1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §465.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that Me City shall not be liable for any carriages, and expressly waives all clams and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claim brought by User, its enployees or agents, or Mist parties which ansa out of the user's access or use of data omvided. Disclaimer This map is neither a legally resordetl map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a corrpilation of records, information antl data located in vanous city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that Me Geographic Informuctit System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If anon, or discrepancies are found pease contact 952-227-1102 The pracedmg disclaimer is provided! Pursuant to Minnesota Statuses §46603, Subtl. 21 (2000), and the user of this nap acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any barrages, and etpressly waives all clam, and agrees to defend, indertnity, and hdtl harmless the City from any and at claire brought by User, Its employees or agents, or Mist parties which arse out of the user's access or use of data Dromtled. JAMES W SABINSKE HARRY E NIEMELA GARY & DEBRA ANDERSON 775 CREEKWOOD 9700 LAKETOWN RD 725 CREEKWOOD CHASKA, MN 55318 -9621 CHASKA, MN 55318 -4513 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9621 ALBERT & SARAH J AVEDIKIAN DANIEL SCHAITBERGER & BRUCE W PAUL 10220 MANDAN CIR CATHERINE A SCHAITBERGER 10240 MANDAN CIR CHASKA, MN 55318 -9401 10241 MANDAN CIR CHASKA, MN 55318 -9401 CHASKA. MN 55318 -9402 BLUFF CREEK GOLF ASSOC THOMAS J & KATHLEEN R GERTZ DAVID R TEICH 1025 CREEKWOOD DR 10001 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 1217 MONROE ST S CHASKA, MN 55318 -9647 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9466 SHAKOPEE , MN 55379 -2062 DONALD E HALLA & WALTER G & CHRIS A ARNDT DALE ALAN GUNDERSON & SANDRA J CWAYNA HALLA 10151 GREAT PLAINS BLVD DEBRA LYNN JENSEN 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA , MN 55318 -9469 845 CREEKWOOD DR CHASKA, MN 55318 -9465 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9643 JEFFREY & KATHLEEN DYPWICK TERRY B & GAYE E CARLSON TIMOTHY A & TERESA M VOEHL 10300 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 821 CREEKWOOD DR 770 CREEKWOOD DR CHASKA, MN 55318 -9467 CHASKA. MN 55318 -9643 CHASKA. MN 55318 -9620 MARYANNE M WHITE ANNE & CLARA VOGEL MARK D & KAY M HALLA 670 CREEKWOOD DR 815 CREEKWOOD DR 6055 HWY 212 CHASKA, MN 55318 -1149 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9643 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9250 SPENCER L & GLORIA A BOYNTON RENEE L STRICKLAND RICHARD T HALVER TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 10251 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 10271 GREAT PLAINS BLVD T77 CREEKWOOD CHASKA, MN 55318 -9468 CHASKA. MN 55318 -9468 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9621 ANTHONY & TINA SWANSON 10260 MANDAN CIR CHASKA, MN 55318 -9401 Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) T -Mobile Cell Tower Planning Case No. 07-04 City of Chanhassen 0 0 0 VICINITY MAP PROJECT DATA ETEM0 1 e I- PNx�W �..� ! � GENERAL NOTES SCOPE OF SUPPLY PROJECT TEAM IO16�i >_.i_liY "uta .: <.. E:: rr:.m.o.°^:'wu : aP _ _ 1UT eo-4GYTIlN me `� Yw uxo LrE aa.vmm®mu "Km • YO'w.m �.xo<c e."Ow°M°i .e o w. aeoo.a. � P.0 � � � � �"": wx.iois m �laaw aces a�nnw m...+a tPML1P mau .m ml. SITE DIRECTIONS l M taMua MY1 .P. Ml P.n9 mPIW .PIiW4w OxPimM YIeaP w �[ ..aw. mPw.r ..s. x. ^.w r40. ��' Mr's <MNPw MEMeYf9 I��1,{��.0 .Yl tleO f WL <DY � e�mx�.. ...P 40 .-I.wt —n4 w 6Ye u<M.N r-Yt � ®Oi Y�\ w YY �q� �� .wiN w•. �T �� O i w ON IY MIN rp. aPW1P WY.PY 1. N 6. tA[ —.0� PI[ WON. fYilala oNiL W. E IPY[ PTd., w NLn�xMP.'.I M1w tV f-�. aEMP m OO— ami < Y =rl;=ONw`. N W.N) waW. lAIIePP M4TI ..IAM aMW N . YlR f dMI.YAI -xi[ OP. RM GOPHER STATE ONE CALL ml.l �R OwIIP xo �M�� MN IYr Nor YCY VY.� .yfl.. aaaP Sr •'PIs"".ase"Pae1e„m�w..n„ A MI^." ra^W'°" w'""'°" ABBREVIATIONS DRAWING INDEX Vie: "ilwwvw�u^w ra a � ra s aIPN.o� CODES AND STANDARDS �M6' •W1111 ..m NaN.IN xe YNN .es • w .. M�PP'I. _m.nemwwN"Rw..+o. wm ml. ss uw sw OO_ �� E F �! A �s S Ai4 �'p iwWL11 91[ I W LTE �1 ^m�u�O ti�'w w wren -. :. IOaI %AAPta 11M1 OIwA DtWieN.PlxM aallyvs Wa�N Np � gmMY Muni ecx zm1�xerOL��}�J'{'j��Y.AIr 1. M�.�v�v�nr+..mP�upaO xwN� xmP mow. 06�s1 O—< w O.NWNII w IaR/�Oml s �s nrsnu P r� rPgb nxlue 01 - 1w=_� 1ww1AE�N11/�. SAM• euY—.M � y � EY.A pwOO. wN�w K lue s L'��'.'a+.° w�in`""eP+�o 'N"e'"" r+a. weN.Pl _ .owre"`ma..Pm.'O"inir msW �viw .exAWPo m Pw�in .. W. li. $�.irxai Ilaa weo.°owd�Pl�m r -Ma. aewMNs Psaiaiw _ - _ _w __. aiPr1pAmv N q arP� +�. m.W+w N.w w r TM� N'�wan Iw+M mm�cs LEGEND n uvN.NMYp1pA.e.A�IPn°""IMm:..aiwl� M"a.w.'"•v P_ v x M mw P M "A' xee.w.. mnrlP � ms a—s mnwna 1 OETAIL .ax. mNwan, .-q.. ver aawtl '• veno m�uus war w.ww xrt .+sP mlP my yr miwTa a•I.aa 'm'" m. wm�v � �r NNwA - s II) - s . x �a� .oso. nxPO - s Iq - W� ry M <sR a16Ria m M¢r t !t Oelz 1� m PA v aIINLISI ewMa IL .si wf Il�v MMO.AM x.P. `� .PpIC - 0.11- RK.D na.w ieJVe M WPsa xa mu NNrW. We< r-xNt .aAI • A xN O.nII.'IP .PP WMP . NIP Y n„ aM.N Mpa.I LI.N. %w" ..YIN N..OaPM .:k: <w c+Pl Ilwel MWwMPr r. fal<.M. m-.�. _ -- �'� W Mumhmip-=—%a�=—z Ma— • . MPw m mIIxNIe. Y t ' n mm�r v �v .PyY _ � (rl - nwa Ixmr.w uu xiY/I i�mPNMla�i s w wee HAL4PIKQNURSERY �I,e,. IiII • : ..MobileEr T MINNEAPOLIS MARKET u.x.I�.u. -sp yp W.11 WE 99-7 -. xaA rw Yl h a� ii'i�-T xlxl.r Nw--. m " AIPWII PROJECT WFO. A OENEML NOTES �. IWN OPGT VWMl ILW. CIIVI=T YMMESOTI — m w—AIPYObTt .o .o 0 0 0 ® II HALLA NURSERY \ C. I 1i C.V. 'I ZO ' I •YII��- c�� / •, • -- nye II � ••\Yv , �.I,..el, I wII(Y�lO WI I rH - - - ISSTE_�v ------------------ .^ w.r+I� — HULA NURSERY s�u— w WE PLAN �. • T-mobile "a,�wLIe _ �3 � i0000 a T Pum xw. cnwwYetx. uwRwrr. ___ MINNEAPOLIS MARKET I •a 0 0 0 ® n W.i MWf{I.1 s.V F.W. RaVW ------------------------------- -------------------------------- --- —rr r r--- -----� �I !! Y •, x ---- ----------------------I .. ------- --- --h-- --------- .® s• I V-7 I I I I j , r I I I 'd„y4 I I I ®-7 ' ENI AMD WE PIAN r MKer ME �• r�.. Ww y".`•.P. — ry��•^' HAIIANUMRN ENLM EO WE PUN �. NW WRis mPN9o. �/��1■ ■ 1 ■ ■Mobile � cxuwAS l u 'A @ v rR1PE 2 MINNEAPOLIS MARKET �� $ 0 SCANNE^ GOPHER STATE ONE CALL .I�rm,......m Iv.,oe al.w I.n mt �!".°i'w �n.lnw w m°mi riissm=,m iW.®w w'n.oan -PLANT SCHEDULE OrL .A..m. W IW .w.V W m01„110a, a 1 I I I 1 G �� LAmDSCA�NOTES I , I i_a...Elm, a Im --------------'-----' ATuS�ilS -GENERAL NOTES �\� ,..w W_wrm„ww .waO.Twq.mn �,IWm n.MapgW,w, .,=.. a,me,� qw mow.. -.q'm ,OM M4I[illm�All.�nP.0 pY1M.W i�oW, N,[ G ey .P� ♦. u slwl,l0 N IOI! N. Tn®M T.W N WY .O O9 w Y.,ed . I.M mMY6 as a.,,mlw MmmmlOw Y\I0 • M M,1 WRVI MMY. nL. iAY WO IaR4.ImYn V ,1[ W6w ,..i.ew'"=",aa 0p1"•r na um mwsmrm+n.em ra .w„wW •ww.v au.,mr m,u. �>am •'v SWUM a V iY.M+3' 7y�i mwu «u o, a,i. arz n,ss,.v n .wm. m •'n'�"ww'r'�S:nwm.,u l.m.. m.wa en....m.W w. vwsem ',. 6 rn.Y,n,�'own R i W.v a e:aSlwa 0.R n m � wa LINMCJPIMO FWI �,'sT .a ar Wr.a a � .w . mn I..m n rams a m.Wma u ..Iwnav,w v,wwa.w Wmswm.m ... mr.m, -DECIDUOUS TREES -CONIFEROUSTREES -PL�ANNTWINNN SPECIFICATIONS i Y• ,w �YIO,A,O`. w„C m„I.IF mW w16 W11R W~�A...,i YIn WnW.MM s•MY. NY A..WY mM P,P..mlmll. a maw �•m�n,INm,Y gOIIO.Ow .Y—•IMa.LL IP. ��,�y�q pnwiv a0i[m W ME YOWI,PW ,m nw.Ir Wlrm IWIVO �ma,woWM u mP 1p 1�q ,,{ M aO� Mnm�® w aftI•m .Mwln Ilm�YuwpnY ..,1,m gIP„N .w.gMLUP'. �' ® �.i�x e,mMiw Yo�.M,MLpWm O•n,�gn P. _ _ m,I.Mw�ma a.�4 M1gI iY RTO,IAP �W,�1.YPiN�'nl�O. m,�M1.�wnm�W1IIIM. -SHRUB •,,:�.»..�..,le£:.:,: �,„�.owmLLww:.,..-,. i,m Y .Iwia RM ®w.i Uwl a..wiworw ,ur p_ru�n wu. umm aou 4mwo= ,rm .amv -PLANTING NOTES r-0' a.'1e`uo.� ,WW.m...mwwmm�m�..e. rmrm„w,nm r�arwnmm� wa-r®..mmlw ummrs-m.s mW.-.A.nm.n°” �.. � � ��i, •. YLNn n.ww0• ,Noor ! , ••..• q�,n'af6 r,Y[O W.w ninm,lOnrn Is.w Wvor..m lw r,.IW ...s nsemn ma... —• "'� r F a��•i.S H., NUPBEPY pe ` NI,Y v M �m �.Lwr.'�.Tr~e°mr r ,`s .. E w - V„M U ■ .�� \■ ■ ■Mobilei Aw �� 11NDlC'M ULAN I!t 1 0M!'R�w`W ��— laaoo aur n,um xw. +"' cwv.wmw, I.IINSOiI. i/itl w—AtPWYC9 t s MINNEAPOLIS MARKET I;g .o SCANNE^ $rANNE[ a"miwru�nM'xuv m�i� wiv.0 �� PY.,...P P.I,..e �J •.�v..,r:�':.:s:^.,�r6�ii��&':.^ha,,.,..., �. .a< »www � :":•<:.:.:�.':;3Y6.'T4AS.w.L ® � x ///�O Nf. J / � YYa R.., II b N i .ImuR.m � b 8 I \ _ _ � - FXISIING PRNATETE DAVE1 b 7.6 , lm ROS. �Ww SY�.61}P6m,CR8 Fc� `x.•.:.a..vr Frrsar�"•{w si°e"i �i:am .... i ••un , .v w w 9 ...rvs OF,maMAI, 1111 SITE PLAN m a.WAS. .�.^.. GOPHER�SSTA,TE ONE CALL 1 f T 1� �J �� GRAVEL DRIVE SEGDON G nwN+m.+Yw� '� rm cnl uSTu nT ON foN sla�i f 1uc[ .., ama w.n Ye..�yana a arm ' °ia.�i 'vurvr.mrimFnm .lw fN �R. 11 STf P �N ■ ■• Mobile •w= MINNEAPOLIS MARKET �mda ®��m,n rnw wa�v •� wiz a�uw�.Xy�."_aw ura NALLA NURSERY pp IAINY EROSION AND GRADING PUNT 100M �Stl ERGT PINNS BLVD. CHWNA45FN. YINNFSOTI, r1n1� , � �AIPRFacY $rANNE[ 0 0 0 loom ar L ' xiM ,a.PA vl 0 nPr W _ �rvxr uw m� ,rr w,ara. ,W ,err mu •' � WOir s IMKW �e,W4 � � N,o[MY9i Ll NO/fIC O1�ai 4 � esu«N YOiaD m,> '�w'.Mr E N wnr,• .m�w/vv liu ma 5 M �, 1 ji s n«nW W,ear... na.e,o+e e,ve N ae,wawwesem nw � eK'r""r'ir rw�r.aP a ,°�',e w ,"i..w•,.am a'a'"'rm r a w P�"`"w.W.Pir"r'i. 1 T o„ Nnsnss aawsv+n 4 • vin SOUTH EUVA19 4, ENLMOEO ELEVATION s ami>r-ra I �� ! _+ �+ea+�+^^ HALLA NUPBENY NW arm M NamrO01 �m.m�«ew,mA Mi - �ti w w r"�.rre maw ��n,M AlP • T..Mobile� P s Dein nri awm, Im ANTENNA INFO. & TOWER ELEVAT �� w . W __— CDT �$8M. i _ °A� �vP�m�v�IPe w�e'8 GNx�uSSEN. wWA30rA MINNEAPOLIS MARKET � @ .m ar ,rr w,ara. ,W ,err mu d-�-oaf City Council Meeting - March 10, 2008 a. Approval of Minutes: -City Council Work Session Minutes dated February 25, 2008 -City Council Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated February 25, 2008 Receive Commission Minutes: -Planning Commission Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated February 19, 2008 b. Resolution #2008-13: 2008 Sealcoat Project 08-06: Accept Bids and Award Contract. C. Resolution #2008-14: 2008 Inflow/Infiltration Project 08-07: Accept Bids and Award Contract. e. Resolution #2008-15: Well No. 12 Project 08-04: Approve Quote for Electrical & SCADA System. f. Resolution #2008-16: Well No. 13 Project 08-05: Approve Quote for Electrical & SCADA System. g. Resolution #2008-17: Stormwater Maintenance: Approve Quote for 2008 Stormwater Pond Cleanout. h. Award of Bid: Recreation Center Lobby Furniture. Acceptance of $2,000 Donation from K1einBank of Chanhassen for Summer Concert Series. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: Teri Voehl: Hi. Teri Voehl, 770 Creekwood Street. Mayor Furlong: Good evening. Teri Voehl: Hello. We are homeowners of 3 years at a location near where the T -Mobile cell phone tower is going to be impacted. Actually we're the closest family, and we were not notified of the change of locations, and the cell phone tower is now going to be 231 feet out our front door. And we would like to know why we weren't notified. We were told an affidavit of mailing was sent. We didn't receive it. We are extremely irate about this. What it's going to do to our property value and what it's going to do to the enjoyment of our property. Mayor Furlong: Okay. I know there was a question that you raised when you sent the email don't know if Mr. Gerhardt... 2 WNNEO City Council Meeting - March 10, 2008 Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, Kate Aanenson has just, do you have the site plan? Did you bring that down Kate? Kate Aanenson: Sure. Todd Gerhardt: Just want to briefly give the council an update on what the issue is and kind of how we came to making our decision on that. Kate Aanenson: When the original application came in, it was notified and notice in the paper. Notified property owners, and then the development sign went up. At that time the Planning Commission and the City Council did recommend approval. Subsequent to that, because there is a FAA requirement, it does tip the State Historical Preservation Office. Upon reviewing it we noticed the whole application. The same process that went to, for the first application, the sign. The notice in the paper. The property owners. The same list of property owners, based on our evidence. We didn't get notices that came back on either case. We went back to the file but nothing came back that there wasn't addressed properly or the such so, it may not have got to the property address but we did what we believe was the same process, and it did get moved. Maybe if I show this one first. The State Historical Society met with T -Mobile. If we can back that out a little bit. Met with T -Mobile to identify, this bigger area met the criteria for the setback but the State Historical Society identified this triangular area as the only place that was acceptable under the State's criteria. So based on that location, it's where it ended up which would be moving then over to this side of the property, which met the criteria for the state. In reading the application, it met the criteria of the conditional use and as was pointed out in the staff report, it wasn't our first choice to move it. You know physically impacted more people, which we recognized, but again we were bound by the State Historic rules, which trumped the City's regulations on this matter. So we had to recommend that approval. So with that it went, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. Then it went to City Council who approved it at this location. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Teri Voehl: We were notified of the original location, and my husband attended the Planning Commission's meetings on that, and the City Council meeting on that. We were never notified that it changed, and we weren't, this became aware to us on Saturday after we heard some drilling out of our front door behind some pine trees. We looked at the web site and saw that it had been moved. But we were not notified. I would think it's the City's responsibility to make sure that the homeowners directly around this are all aware of it. We weren't aware. We weren't aware there was a meeting. We weren't aware that there was a proposed change. We just assumed it was still at the original location. We didn't receive the mailing. Councilman Litsey: I know one of the things after received your email and then we had a chance to talk a little bit and I sent you some stuff this morning, because I did research it a little bit on my own and then deferred it to staff as well but, there were notice, mailings that went out on the, I believe it was the 25`s of October, which was prior to the Planning Commission public hearing. And I know your name was listed on there and address but that never got to them? 3 City Council Meeting - March 10, 2008 Teri Voehl: It did not, and it also says Drive instead of Street. Our address is Creekwood Street. Councilman Litsey: Street. Teri Voehl: We didn't get it. Kate Aanenson: But they did get the first mailing, and there are different address. Some say Street, some say Creekwood Drive. The County's legal says, but none of them came back. They all got the first thing so none of them came back to say they were addressed in error so. Teri Voehl: We didn't get it. Kate Aanenson: I'm not disagreeing that you didn't get it. I'm just saying all the first ones went out. They did receive the first one. The same address was used the second time and that's all I'm trying to understand. Teri Voehl: This, yeah I think it's strange also, but we didn't get it. I mean this is now 230 feet out our front door. We would certainly have been at any follow-up hearings or meetings regarding this. It's going to kill our property value. Councilman Litsey: I know when I read through it a little more too, at the Planning Commission there was some residents there that expressed some concerns. Teri Voehl: Yeah, and I read that too. I met with Sharmeen this morning. She gave me. Councilman McDonald: If I could, could I speak to that because I chaired both of those meetings and they were quite heavily attended. In fact you've got another couple neighbors over there who were very upset. There was another gentlemen who I think may be even closer. Teri Voehl: No, he's not closer. Councilman McDonald: Well at the time, as I recall, he was within about 200 feet because that was his whole complaint too was this was right outside his back door. Teri Voehl: He's much further. Councilman McDonald: He seemed to indicate it was much closer but, we were very upset with the way that this had worked out, and I think I expressed quite a bit of that but as Kate said, it was out of our hands. We had approved the original positioning, where it was at, and again the State came in and at that point we had no choice. And some of my comments at that were, T - Mobile evidently knew about different locations and I think one of the things that I had asked staff to look at in the future was, we can't just take these guys at their word. If we had known about this a little bit better and had more foresight as to a number of different locations, which I felt we were not given, maybe at that point we could have had better involvement within the community but when it was brought to us on the first time through, this was the most ideal spot and because of the need for cell phone communications in that area, that was one of the reasons 4 City Council Meeting - March 10, 2008 why the commission you know agreed to approve it where it was at. When it came back through the second time, we really felt we did not have much choice and that the impact again, those meetings were attended. A number of your neighbors did speak out about why it was being moved. It was explained. I was under the impression and again within that neighborhood there was a group that was together in all this and that the word would have spread and that everybody who was opposed to it would have been there because the one neighbor you had, he was very vocal in his opposition to it. Teri Voehl: Well the new location is better for him and worst for us. Could you put that back up here so I can. Basically this is our front door. We have windows all along this. This new location is right out our front door. All the windows to the front of our house. When it was originally over somewhere around here, right? Obviously, he lives here. This was going to be, probably within his view but a lot further away from it than we are. I can't see any reason why somebody didn't make sure that we were aware of this thing being moved. We found out Saturday, and the footings are in and it's now up to you all a foregone conclusion and it's devastating to us. We moved here because it's a beautiful area and it's peaceful and it's quiet and it's visually very appealing and this was devastating to us. I mean from all of our front windows, our front door, we have a front patio. This is going to be what we look at. Before it was over here we were upset, but now I mean if we would have been notified. One mailing is all? I mean no follow up? No letters? No nothing saying anything, anything was even finalized or anything was being considered. Supposedly one card was sent. We got the original card. My husband attended the meetings. He signed in. He met Sharmeen. He met probably many of you. Well me met many people on the Planning Commission. No one noticed the absence of the person who lives right here? These people over here too are certainly not happy about it. He was out of town for the meeting and couldn't attend, but he's irate as well. I mean if it was summertime we do see our neighbors a little more but this all happened over the winter. Nobody sees anybody or we would have heard from somebody. I assume they all thought we knew and probably would see them at the meeting but I mean these ladies are 80 some years old. We don't run into them often. Mayor Furlong: Okay. What is the normal process of notification? There is a mailing within a certain area. What are the different levels of notification. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, our ordinance exceeds the law. It's 300 feet. We go typically 500 feet. Sometimes we go beyond that. We did speak to some of the people before the meeting who chose not to show up to the meeting. The two elderly women you're talking about came in that day or the day before to talk to us about that. We explained to them the State Historic Preservation. Again we're stuck with that triangular area with what the State approved somewhere in that site. But they did come in and did tell us that they wouldn't be at the meeting and voiced their concerns. We did share that at the meeting that they had come in so. Mayor Furlong: But other than mailings, are there any other? Kate Aanenson: That's our typical process. Todd Gerhardt: Put up the development sign. E City Council Meeting - March 10, 2008 Kate Aanenson: Yeah, and a notice in the paper. Teri Voehl: But nobody moved that sign either. I mean it was originally off 101. Kate Aanenson: It came down and then it went back up though. Teri Voehl: But it didn't go over here to tip us off either. Councilman Litsey: Where did the sign stay Kate? Over more by 101. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Todd Gerhardt: And you want it to be visible you know. It's on the property that's being impacted so, as the number of cars that go by, if we put it back over there, some of the people that live closer to 101 may not see it so. We try to keep our web site up to date on all the development activity going on. There was a public hearing at the Planning Commission. That was advertised in the paper, and I know everybody doesn't look at that. We send out notices. I apologize that you didn't get notified. Staff will sit down and talk about what other procedures we can go through to try to notify people. Bottom line is that I don't know, our hands were tied. I think Roger might be able, the city attorney might be able to give you more detail, but our hands were tied on this. We didn't have a lot of choices when it came down to, I think Kate showed you the triangle of where this thing could be located and that's not a lot of room to move the tower around. Teri Voehl: Even within the triangle, do you have? Because at probably the worst possible location for our home, and the best for Mr. Halla. It's right here. It's in the furthest most corner of his, of this, it's closest to our house. Our house is right here. I mean even if it was up here it would be better but the whole thing is devastating to us. Todd Gerhardt: Understand. Councilman Litsey: I certainly understand your concerns and wish you had received the mailing and had a chance to you know, to come. Earlier on in the project when you were tracking it, was it just kind of your assumption that it was going to be, was a done deal where it was at? That it was over with? Teri Voehl: Well we knew it was a done deal where it was at. I mean I didn't even know there was a potential for them to change it. The City Council voted and I mean that all was, right? I mean it was all. Todd Gerhardt: You're absolutely right. I mean when it originally went through, you know everybody probably left that meeting thinking it was concluded. City Council Meeting - March 10, 2008 Teri Voehl: Yeah, we had no reason to assume there was going to be any changes and we didn't hear from anybody that there was going to be any changes and we didn't hear from anybody that there was going to be any changes. Todd Gerhardt: And then when SHPO got involved, the State Historical Society, you know they challenged the location of it and not 100% sure who contacted them to have it modified and changed. Once they made application for that change, we had no choice. We followed the same procedures that we followed the first time it was approved. Used the same mailing list and notice and processes, and I know you weren't notified or didn't receive the mailing. Teri Voehl: But don't you think it's extremely strange that the people that live right here, when you move it to right here, or right here, didn't show up for the next meetings and hearings on this? We had no idea. Mayor Furlong: And I guess all we can say is, to, and I think Mr. Gerhardt said it. We'll take a look at the process. Teri Voehl: That doesn't do me any good. Mayor Furlong: And I don't know that you're going to get an answer that you're looking for tonight if that answer is to not have that tower built there. If that's what your question is about. The issue that's concerning is whether or not people get noticed. You say you didn't get it. I believe you, and yet I hear what was done and it was the same process used the first time. It's the same process that we use all the time. Teri Voehl: It's one card sent out, and if you miss that you get a 150 foot cell tower? Mayor Furlong: Well what I heard is that was the notice for the public hearing. It's directly sent to property owners within a certain area. There's also the development sign that goes up on the property, which went up the second time I understand. Teri Voehl: In the same location. Mayor Furlong: But, and that could have been development of something with nothing to do with the cell tower too. If there was another application brought in by that property owner, the sign would go up. And I know we notice in the newspaper as well and not everybody reads all those but I guess the question is, and what Mr. Gerhardt said is, we'll take a look at it and see what. Teri Voehl: Well we get the Chaska paper, not the Chanhassen paper. Mayor Furlong: Excuse me? Teri Voehl: We get the Chaska paper. Mayor Furlong: Okay. 7 City Council Meeting - March 10, 2008 Teri Voehl: Not the Chanhassen paper. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And our official newspaper is the Chanhassen Villager, and that's what we designate every year so that's where our official notices go so that'd be part of the problem too. But we can empathize with your situation. I think the challenge here and the reason it was moved is because the State Historical Society, as I understand it by statute, has over riding authority in this situation. Even though it was originally approved, they disapproved it and therefore it was not allowed to go there. Teri Voehl: I understand the process but I don't understand why there was not a second attempt made to notify us. Mayor Furlong: Well, and I think that's something that we'll consider is how many attempts are reasonable number of attempts to let people know, and that's something we can review. Teri Voehl: So what is our recourse? Mayor Furlong: With regard to? Teri Voehl: Trying to stop this cell tower from being outside of our front door? Mayor Furlong: Mr. Knutson? Roger Knutson: There is no recourse available through the City. The City has approved it. They're under construction. Teri Voehl: So we have to find a real estate attorney and see if we can have an injunction? Roger Knutson: Certainly that'd be your own, you can try. Teri Voehl: As a taxpayer of the city, I am extremely upset that we weren't notified. I think everybody in this audience would like to know if there was a 150 foot cell tower put right outside their front door. Councilman Litsey: I certainly understand your concerns and I think the concerns were brought forward, at least to some extent, at the Planning Commission meeting. I think they did take a look at those concerns from some of your neighbors in the area to see whether or not it was, those were at least taken into account. And then of course you have to go by what's legally, we can and can't do in terms of projects and then we move forward. So I think it's good to look at the process. It doesn't help you tonight. I understand that. I think that's all we really can do at this point unfortunately. Councilman McDonald: Mayor, one point. I was just going to say if I could, one of the things that we did try to do at the Planning Commission because there was involvement from everyone, we did put extra requirements on the cell phone tower as far as to try to camouflage it a little bit City Council Meeting - March 10, 2008 because we were sensitive to the fact that yes, everyone in that area is now going to go out at some angle and that they would see this tower up in the air. And they did bring forward a number of ways to paint it or to try to at least minimize the visual impact. I understand that it's still there but we did try to take all that into account. We looked at a number of different items but again by the second time it came through, I really felt that the commission's hands were tied. We couldn't do anything about it at that point. Councilman Litsey: The other thing too, if my memory serves me right and I think it was Mayor Furlong who brought this suggestion up was that if the tower wasn't used for a period of a year or so, that it had to be removed. Not that that helps you immediately but I know there was some talk about that technology maybe being obsolete within 5 years and if that's the case, and if in fact it's not used, then at least that was what memorialized in that approval that they're going to have to take it down so it doesn't sit there for another 20 years, just for no reason. And I thought that was a great amendment at the time and probably will come into play. Not immediately but hopefully down the road. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Anyone else for visitor presentations this evening? Okay. Let's move on with our next items. JIMMY JOHN'S, 7851 MARKET BOULEVARD, APPLICANT, KRAUS-ANDERSON, INC.,LLC: REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL WITH VARIANCES FOR A 1,650 SQUARE FOOT ONE-STORY RESTAURANT BUILDING; AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A FREE STANDING, FAST FOOD RESTAURANT IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) LOCATED ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MARKET STREET STATION. Kate Aanenson: Thank you. This item appeared before the Planning Commission on their February 19th meeting. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval. The site itself for the Jimmy John's is part of the Market Street Station project, which was approved in 2003. Located just south of West 78`s Street. The request is for a conditional use for the restaurant. When we approved the original site for Market Street Station we looked at a restaurant pad here and an additional restaurant attached to the Dinner Theater itself. At that time this was originally approved for 2 sites. The project that's being requested tonight is just for one use itself, and the other factor on that is, that this does require a conditional use. As you recall one of the issues that we talked about with the code updates is that a free standing restaurant in the central business district probably doesn't need to be a conditional use. At this point that's how the code reads so we are getting a conditional use that's one, I just want to circle back to that point. That's one of the things that we would be changing. A free standing. It's not a drive through. That we wouldn't make that a conditional use. The architecture itself would be similar to what's at Market Street Station and it does meet all the requirements of the district itself regarding the pre -cast stucco and the like. It will have an entrance facing, I'll just show the elevation. It does meet the requirements for fenestration. We added additional, the applicant added an additional window. The front itself faces, this is the back side of the hotel. This is the existing dumpster. So the back side, the patio side is actually to the interior. There will be a door here but that's the control point coming in would be this so that'd be exit only so there's sidewalks. The Planning Commission did discuss access and sidewalks that is shown more R1 Administration January 24, 2007 CITY OF Sharmeen Al-Jaff CHANHASSEN Mr. Steve Edwards Building Inspections T -Mobile USA 7700 Market Boulevard 8000 West 78tb Street, Suite 400 PO Box 147 Edina, MN 55419 Chanhassen, MN 55317 application is incomplete and the following information is missing: Administration Dear Mr. Edwards: Phone: 952.227.1100 Sharmeen Al-Jaff Fax 952.227.1110 This letter is to inform you that we are in receipt of your application for a conditional Building Inspections use permit and site plan for the purpose of erecting a cell tower on property located Phone: 952.227.1180 south of 10000 Great Plains Boulevard, and legally described as Outlot A, Halla Fax: 952.227.1190 Maryanne Addition. After review of data submitted, it was determined that the Engineering application is incomplete and the following information is missing: Phone. 952,227 1160 Fax 952.227,1170 1. The City Code prohibits building on an Outlot. Therefore, the outlot must be Finance re -platted. Please submit all data required in Section 18-40 of the Chanhassen Phone: 952.227.1140 City Code. Fax 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation 2. Staff questions the choice of access to the site and recommends you Phone: 952 227.1120 investigate providing access from the nursery. Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center Therefore, your application is incomplete and we will not be able to review it 2310 Coulter Phone: 952.227.1400 227.1400 until these items have been submitted. This also means that the 60 -da deadline y Fax: 952.227.1404 to process an application will not begin until we have received all the necessary information to review the T -Mobile Tower application. Planning S Natural Resources Phone: 952 227,1130 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1134 or e- Fax.952.227.1110 mail at saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Public Works 1591 Park Road Sincerely, Phone. 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952227.1125 Sharmeen Al-Jaff Fax: 952 227.1110 Senior Planner Web SRO www, ci.chanhassen.mn.us Enclosures giplanx2006 planning cases\06-33 t -mobile cell tower cup\incomplew application jan 2007.doc The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. I Public Works September 19, 2006 CITY OF 5. The city code allows a maximum height for a cell tower of 150 feet including CHANHASSEN Mr. Steve Edwards Fax: 952.227.1310 T -Mobile USA 7700 Market Boulevard 8000 West 78uh Street, Suite 400 Pe147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Edina, MN 55419 Administration Dear Mr. Edwards: Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 9552227.1110 6. Provide a photo composite image of the tower and existing surrounding area. This letter is to inform you that we are in receipt of your application for a conditional Building Inspections use permit for the purpose of erecting a cell tower on property located south of Phone:952227.1180 10,000 Great Plains Boulevard, and legally described as Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Fax 952227.1190 Addition (Planning File Case 06-33). After review of data submitted, it was Engineering determined that the application is incomplete and the following information is Phone: 952227.1160 missing: Fax 952.227.1170 Finance 1. A site plan application must be submitted with the conditional use permit as Phone: 952227.1140 required in Section 20-231 of the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. Fax: 952221.1110 Park A Recreation 2. Submit all data required in Section 20-109 of the Chanhassen Zoning Phone: 952.227.1120 Ordinance (e.g. a grading, drainage, and erosion control plan for the access Fax:952.227.1110 road and the cell tower vicinity, a landscaping plan, site coverage calculation, Recreation Center lot area, etc.). 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 3. Submit material samples and color information for the tower and equipment cabinet. Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 4. A conditional use permit application for the fence as required in Section 20- Fax:952227.1110 1023 of the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. Public Works 1591 Park Road 5. The city code allows a maximum height for a cell tower of 150 feet including Phone: 952.227.1300 all antennas and other attachments. The height of the tower is 150 + 4 -foot Fax: 952.227.1310 Lightning Rod. The City Council may allow an increase in height if you can Senior Center demonstrate that, based upon the topography of the site and surrounding areas, Phone: 952.227.1125 antenna design, surrounding tree cover and structures and/or through the use Fax: 952.227.1110 of screening, off-site views of the tower will be minimized. web SRO www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 6. Provide a photo composite image of the tower and existing surrounding area. 7. Clearly demonstrate why T -Mobile cannot co -locate on an existing tower. The explanation offered in your letter dated September 14, 2006 did not adequately address the issue. 8. Staff questions the choice of access to the site and recommends you investigate providing access from the nursery. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A groat place to live, work, and play. Mr. Steve Edwards September 19, 2006 Page 2 Therefore, your application is incomplete and we will not be able to review it until these items have been submitted. This also means that the 60 -day deadline to process an application will not begin until we have received all the necessary information to review the T -Mobile Tower application. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1134. Sincerely, J Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner Enclosures gAplan\2006 planning cases\06-33 t -mobile cell tower cupNincomplete application.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FAX (952) 227-1110 TO: Campbell Knutson, PA 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE JOB NO. 6/14/07 07-04 ATTENTION Sue Nelson RE: Document Recording E Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Request ❑ E COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 4/9/07 07-04 Conditional Use Permit 07-04 (T -Mobile Cellular Tower on Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition ❑ FORBIDS DUE For Recording ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS COPY TO: Steve Edwards, T -Mobile ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return E For Recording ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints SIGNED: Kim leuwisse , (952) 227-1107 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #07-04 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for a 149 -foot telecommunication tower and a 6 -foot privacy fence. 2. Property. The permit is for the following described property ("subject property") in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota: Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition 3. Conditions. The permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant shall enter into a conditional use permit agreement and submit financial security to guarantee the improvements. b. The tower shall comply with the requirements in ARTICLE XXX. TOWERS AND ANTENNAS of the Zoning Ordinance. c. The tower shall not be illuminated by artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state authority for a particular tower. d. No signage, advertising or identification of any kind intended to be visible from the ground or other structures is permitted, except applicable warning and equipment information signage required by the manufacturer or by Federal, State, or local authorities. e. The applicant shall submit documentation at the time of building permit application showing the height above grade for all potential mounting positions for co -located antennas and the minimum separation distances between antennas. A description of the tower's capacity, including the number and type of antennas that can be accommodated should also be provided. The monopole color shall be the brand "Tnemac" and the color "Blue Elusion". g. All outdoor storage associated with the Halla Nursery and located within Oudot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the tower and the area shall be revegetated. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: April 9, 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Thomas A. Furlong, /Zodd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of �Uby 2007, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. Notary blic DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard KIM T. MEUWISSEN P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Pubik -Minnesota kNotary y Cnmmhelgn res Jan 37,2010 (952) 227-1100 G:\PLAN\2007 Planning Cases\07-04 T-Mobile\Conditional Use Permit Agreement.doc Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- CITY OF CHANHASSEN lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING newspaper, r as provided b Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as NOTICE ISHEREBYGIVEN that PLANNING CASE 4 amended. y IVE the Chanhassen Planning /�/ Commission will hold a public (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. hearing on Tuesday, March 20, 2007, was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said at 7:00 p.ID. in the Council Chambers Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of in Chanhassen CityHaR,7700Market the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition to consider a request for Site Plan and publication of the Notice: ReviewandaConditionalUsePermit 1w for the construction of a 145 -foot cell tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod, abcdefghijkltnnopgrsin and to allow a fenceover 6 % Iselin height on property located west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, south of Halla Nursery, andeast of Bluff Creek Golf Laurie A. Hartmann Course (Outiot A, Halla Maryanne Addition). Applicant: T -Mobile. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public Subscribed and sworn before me on review on c a_U4 sett mn ty Hall during regular business hours. this (/ day of ��" `-' . 2007 All interested persons are invited to attendthispublichearingandexpress GWEN M. RADUENZ their opinions with respect to this NOTA8y Fu81JC-MMESOIA proposal. My Comm s Exlim Jo. 31,2010 Sharmeen Al -Jeff, Senior Planner Email: l' ffAci c anha sen tun us Notary Public Phone: 952-227- 1134 (PublishedintheChanhacsen Villager on Thursday, March 8, 2007; No. 4845) RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $40.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ............................... $40.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $11.89 per column inch Engineering April 24, 2007 CITY OF CIIH111111JJf�11 11H1 MSS lI T -Mobile USA Finance Mr. Stephen Edwards 7700 Market Boulevard 8000 West 78`' Street PO Bax 147 Suite 400 Chanhassen, MN 55317 1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement and submit financial Phone: 952.227.1120 Edina, MN 55419 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Dear Mr. Edwards: Fax 952.227.1110 the edge of the pad. Building Inspections This letter is to formally notify you that on April 9, 2007, the City Council adopted Phone: 952.227.1180 the following motions: Fax: 952.227.1190 Trees shall be reserved to the greatest extent possible. P gr Engineering Site Plan Permit Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.221.1170 "The City Council approves Site Plan Permit #07-04 for a 149 -foot Finance telecommunication tower and a 6 -foot privacy fence as shown on the site plan Phone: 952.227.1140 received January 19, 2007, subject to the following conditions: Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation 1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement and submit financial Phone: 952.227.1120 security to guarantee the improvements. Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation center 2. Clearing for the tower and equipment pad shall be no greater than 15 feet from 2310 CoulterBoulevard Phone: 952,227.1400 the edge of the pad. Fax: 952.227 1404 3. A maximum of 25 feet is allowed for clearing the access road to the site. Planning a Natural Resources Trees shall be reserved to the greatest extent possible. P gr Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 4. The applicant shall install a minimum of eight Black Hills spruce around the Public Works equipment platform. Trees shall be at least six feet in height. 1591 Park Road Phone: 952227.1300 5. Site grading and vegetation removal shall be minimized to the greatest extent Fax: 952.227.1310 practical. If any excess material is anticipated to be generated as a result of Senior Center access road construction, the disposal location must be approved in writing by Phone: 952227.1125 City staff prior to road construction. Fax 952227.1110 Web Site 6. A rock construction entrance complying with the City's standard detail www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us (#5301) shall be included on the Erosion and Grading Plan and shall be constructed prior to the remainder of the gravel road. 7. If applicable, the applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. (Watershed district and MPCA permits are necessary if the total disturbed area is in excess of 1.0 acres). SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding (rails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Mr. Stephen Edwards April 24, 2007 Page 2 8. The monopolettower shall be moved 25 feet to the west for a total setback of 175 feet and maintain a minimum of 150 -foot setback from the north, west and south property lines. 9. The driveway off of Creekwood Drive may not be used to serve nor access the Halla Nursery commercial operation. 10. Building Official Conditions: a. A building permit is required to construct the tower and equipment platform; the tower must be designed for a wind load of 90 MPH for 3 seconds (ref. 2000 ]BC, Sec. 1609) and include the effect of one-half inch of radial ice (ref. MSBC 1303.1800). b. The plans (tower and platform) must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota." Conditional Use Permit "The City Council approves Conditional Use Permit #07-04 for a 149 -foot telecommunication tower and a 6 -foot privacy fence as shown on the site plan received January 19, 2007, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall enter into a conditional use permit agreement and submit financial security to guarantee the improvements. 2. The tower shall comply with the requirements in ARTICLE )=. TOWERS AND ANTENNAS of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The tower shall not be illuminated by artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state authority for a particular tower. 4. No signage, advertising or identification of any kind intended to be visible from the ground or other structures is permitted, except applicable warning and equipment information signage required by the manufacturer or by Federal, State, or local authorities. 5. The applicant shall submit documentation at the time of building permit application showing the height above grade for all potential mounting positions for co -located antennas and the minimum separation distances between antennas. A description of the tower's capacity, including the number and type of antennas that can be accommodated should also be provided. 6. The monopole color shall be the brand "Tnemac" and the color "Blue Elusion". All outdoor storage associated with the Halla Nursery and located within Oudot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the tower and the area shall be revegetated " C ' Mr. Stephen Edwards April 24, 2007 Page 3 Site Plan Permit and Conditional Use Permit Agreements must be prepared which will be done by our offices; however, we need an estimate on the cost of improvements for the site (erosion control, landscaping, etc.). A building permit cannot be issued until the Site Plan Agreement has been executed and recorded at Carver County and financial guarantees submitted to the City. Should you have any questions, please call me at 952-227-1134 or e-mail at saliaff @ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner c: Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Jerry Mohn, Building Official g.Nplan\2007 planning ma \07-04 t-mobileNapproval letter.dm Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1100 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and site plan approval for the Phone: 952.227.1160 construction of a 1 as -foot monopole cowAnunication tower with a 4 -foot lightning Fax: 952.227.1170 rod and a conditional use permit- ermit fora 7 -foot hi fence. The request was Finance sewed and recommended for approv by the Planning Commission on March Phone: 952227.1140 20, 2007. Fax: %2.227.1110 Part & Recreation ACTION REQUIRED 3 MEMORANDUM (� City Council approval requires a two-thirds vote of City Council present. TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager ` \ CITY l OF FROM: V Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner CHANHASSEN The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 20, 2007, to review the Planning A DATE: April 9, 2007 7700 Market Boulevard Fax: 952.227.1110 agenda packet. PO Box 147 SUBJ: Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review to allow a Chanhassen, MN 55317 Fax: 952.227.1310 145 -foot Telecommunication Tower with a 4 -foot lightning Administration • Can someone climb the up the cell tower? rod and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a fence over 6'V2 Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 feet in height, T -Mobile USA — Planning Case No. 07-04 Fax: 952.227.1110 cherry picker. www.ci.chanhassen.mo.us--- Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1100 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and site plan approval for the Phone: 952.227.1160 construction of a 1 as -foot monopole cowAnunication tower with a 4 -foot lightning Fax: 952.227.1170 rod and a conditional use permit- ermit fora 7 -foot hi fence. The request was Finance sewed and recommended for approv by the Planning Commission on March Phone: 952227.1140 20, 2007. Fax: %2.227.1110 Part & Recreation ACTION REQUIRED Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax:952.227.1110 City Council approval requires a two-thirds vote of City Council present. Recreation Center 23hoCoulter ne:952.227.1400 Phone: 952227.1400 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY Fax: 952.227.1404 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 20, 2007, to review the Planning A proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 to approve the Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 proposed development. The summary and verbatim minutes are item la of this Fax: 952.227.1110 agenda packet. Public Works 1591 Park Road Some of the questions that were raised at the Planning Commission meeting Phone: 952.227.1300 included: Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior center • Can someone climb the up the cell tower? Phone: 952.227.1125 o There are climbing pegs that begin at approximately 20 to 25 feet above Fax: 952.227.1110 ground. The climbing pegs are accessible by an extension ladder or a Web site cherry picker. www.ci.chanhassen.mo.us--- — Will there be a blinking light at the top of the tower? o The applicant currently hasaletter from the FAA stating that at he current exact location with the proposed coordinates, they may erect tower without a light. The applicant must re -file with the new positio 25 feet west of the current location. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gieat place to live, work, and play. Todd Gerhardt T -Mobile Cell Tower Planning Case 07-04 April 9, 2007 Page 2 Does the applicant have to use barbed wire? / o This is an Agricultural Estate District. The use of barbed i s pe tt din this di�i�rict. WIJ The applicant is using it as an added security measure. � a � 4 7 jv' f (' ( N�k Can another user request to build another tower? o The City requires all applicants to look within a one -mile search area and provide proof that there is no other existing structure to locate an antenna on. Also, the city requires all tower owners to provide a letter of intent stating that they will allow other users to co - locate on a tower. How many antennas can be placed on the proposed tower? o The tower is designed to accommodate four users but the design can be adjusted to accommodate more. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the motions approving the site plan and conditional use permits to allow a 145 -foot Telecommunication Tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod and a conditional use permit to allow a fence over 61/2 feet in height beginning on page 12 of the staff report dated March 20, 2007 for Planning Case 07-04 for T -Mobile USA with conditions. ATTAC1rII1IENTS 1. Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 20, 2007. 9:\plan\2007 planning cases107-04 t-mobil6exe five summm yAm STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review to allow a 145 -foot Telecommunication Tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a fence over 61/2 feet in height. LOCATION: Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, located west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course. APPLICANT: T -Mobile USA 8000 West 78'" Street Suite 400 Edina, MN 55419 (612) 702-5065 Contact: Stephen Edwards smedwards24@yaboo.com PRESENT ZONING: A-2, Agricultural Estate District 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Large Lot (2.5 Acre Minimum 1/10 acre outside of MUSA) ACREAGE: 12+ acres DENSITY: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Conditional use permit and site plan approval for the construction of a 145 foot monopole communication tower with a 4 foot lightning rod and a conditional use permit to allow a fence over 61/2 feet in height. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi-judicial decision. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 2 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY the applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and site plan approval for the construction of a 145 -foot monopole communication tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod and a conditional use permit for a 7 -foot high fence0'l'he tower is proposed to be situated south of Halla Nursery, west of Highway 101, north of Creekwood Drive and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course. SUBJECT A total of six directional antennas will be mounted in a triangular configuration at the top of the tower0fhe number of directional antennas has the potential of increasing up to twelve(I Three equipment cabinets measuring approximately 6' high x 4' wide x 4' deep are proposed to be located within a fenced area at the base of the tower. The applicant is showing three potential future equipment cabinets in addition to the three proposed cabinets. Some landscaping is proposed around the fence. These plantings are added around the perimeter of the leased site to soften the look of the base of the tower and fence. There are also Some existing mature trees. The tower will be placed among the stand of trees. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 3 / The proposed chain link fence and three rows of barbed wire wilihave a total height of 7 feet. Barbed wire fences are permitted in Agricultural Estate Distric? The City Code requires all fences over 6% feet in height to receive a conditional use pem�= ut.Access to the tower is provided via a driveway off of Creekwood Drive. Staff is recommending approval with conditions. BACKGROUND Halla Nursery is a legal non -conforming use located north of the subject site. In 1997, the City reached an agreement regarding the scope of Halla Nursery, "Stipulation for Entry of Judgment". It listed conditions for the continuation of the use as ordered by the court. The judgment included a list of existing buildings and uses. These buildings and uses were limited to the Halla Nursery site. Section 20-72 (a). of the City Code prohibits expansion of non -conforming uses@Dunng review of the T -Mobile application, staff noticed storage of equipment and expanded parking area from the Halla Nursery onto Outlot A. This prompted staff to examine aerial photography of the subject site. The expansion took place between the years 2000 and 2002. Aerials from the year 2000 show trees and green space, while aerials from the year 2002 show expanded parking and storage of equipment. Staff is recommending the expansion be illuminated and the area restored to the limits of the parking area shown in the aerials from the Year 2000. Close up of Halla Nursery Expansion into Outlot A T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 4 GENERAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE PLAN The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit and a site plan review to construct a 145 -foot monopole tower for wireless communication services and a 4 -foot lightning rod. The City's Zoning Ordinance allows telecommunication towers and antennas in Agricultural Estate Districts subject to the approval of a conditional use permit by the City Council. In reviewing conditional use permit requests, the Planning Commission must consider possible adverse affects of the use. The standards are: The City of Chanhassen finds it necessary for the promotion and preservation of the public health, safety, welfare, and aesthetics of the community that the construction, location, size, and maintenance of wireless telecommunication facilities be controlled. Further, the City finds: (1) Towers and antennas have a direct impact on, and a relationship to, the image of the community; (2) The manner of installation, location, and maintenance of towers and antennas affects the public health, safety, welfare, and aesthetics of the community, (3) A reasonable opportunity for the establishment of wireless telecommunication must be provided to serve residential and business needs, and; (4) Uncontrolled and unlimited towers and antennas adversely impact the image and aesthetics of the community and, thereby, undermine economic value and growth. The following constitutes our findings: A 145 -foot high tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod at this location should not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of surrounding property or substantially d' sh property values the proposed tower is over 400 feet from any existing residence. It is separated byroads and existing vegetation. Further, the proposed tower should not endanger the public health or safety if the conditions attached to the permit and building code requirements are adhered to. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 5 (9)n locating a telecommunication antenna, the applicant must demonstrate that the antenna cannot be accommodated on an existing or approved tower or building within a one mile search radius. Bandimere Park is located within the one mile radius and contains a fire siren pole. The pole is 35 feet high. The City is considering increasing the height of the pole. Staff asked the applicant to conduct a study that will determine how high the tower should be to meet the needs of T - Mobile coverage. The study concluded that the tower must have a height between 140 and 145 feet. The applicant is requesting approval to erect a monopole tower because there are no existing structures of adequate height in this portion of the City. They have a service deficiency covering this area of the City. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 6 Staff instructed the applicant to provide images showing the tower in the proposed location. The following are images prepared by the applicant: Image showing the tower from the Image showing the tower from the north looking south southeast looking northwest Image showing the tower from The west looking east City Code requires new antenna support structures to be designed to accommodate additional users. Providing opportunities for co -location is important if the total number of towers in the City is to be kept to a minimum. To ensure the possibility of co -location in the future, the applicant has submitted a letter of intent committing the tower owner to allow the shared use of the tower. The City also received a letter from Cingular confirming the intention to collocate on this tower. The applicant shall submit documentation at the time of building permit application showing the height above grade for all potential mounting positions for co -located antennas and the minimum separation distances between antennas. A description of the tower's capacity, T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 7 including the number and type of antennas that it can accommodate should also be provided. Additional antennas would be approved administratively through the building permit process. Accessory structures located with the tower include a pre -assembled base transceiver station (BTS) that would be located at the base of the tower. The BTS is a cabinet -type structure that contains the radio frequency transceivers, computer and climate control equipment, and batteries for back-up power. As additional directional antennas are needed, additional BTS will be required. The applicant is showing three proposed and three future cabinets to accommodate future expansion of the service. The cable that connects the BTS to the antennas runs inside the monopole. Staff finds that the applicant has met the general standards for all conditional uses and the design standards for towers. The applicant is proposing to erect a seven- foot high chain link fence with three rows of barbed wire around the tower and ground equipment. Any fence over 6%2 feet in height in the Agricultural Estate District is permitted as a conditional use. This will add to the security of the tower and accessory structures. Staff is recommending approval of the 7 -foot fence with conditions. To reduce the visual impacts of the tower on properties farther from the site, the tower color shall utilize the brand "Tnetnaa" and the color "Blue Elusion, and will contain no artificial lighting or signage. PAPJ ING/INTERIOR CIRCULATION No parking is proposed. The plans show a vehicle turnaround area. The applicant expects one vehicle per month to visit the site for maintenance purposes. No parking is required by ordinance. ACCESS The applicant is proposing to enter the site from an existing field access point off of Creekwood Drive. The length of the driveway will exceed 800 feet. Staff is of the opinion that the entrance should be from the Nursery. This will shorten the length of the driveway substantially. The owner of the Nursery prefers a separate access for the tower than the Nursery. The driveway will be used to access the tower and equipment. The applicant has indicated that the site will generate one trip per month. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 8 HIGHWAY 101 The City of Chanhassen, in conjunction with Carver County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation, has initiated a study to identify deficiencies and improvements necessary for a two-lane, 3.3 mile segment of the Highway 101 Corridor in Chanhassen. The project limits are Lyman Boulevard/County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 18 on the north and the Scott County Line on the south. The intersection of MN Highway 101 and Pioneer Trail/CSAH 14 has recently (2005) been widened and signalized. The objective of this study is to develop and evaluate alternatives to preserve the long-term safety, capacity, and mobility of the 3.3 mile GMN Highway 101 Corridor in Chanhassen. 1 D Several alignments are being evaluated. For the purpose of this application, staff will focus on the section of the highway located immediately east of Outlot A (subject site). One of the alignments (which is the preferred alignment) moves the highway approximately 100 feet to the west of the existing alignment. The current proposed location of the tower is 150 feet west of existing Highway 101. The City Code allows tower to be located at distance half their height from a public right-of-way. This may result in a future non -conforming situation. Future preliminary engineering plans and detailed environmental studies will be completed for alternatives determined to be feasible (and reasonable) as a primary outcome of the study. The study will include recommendations for finther development of concept level improvements, project staging and estimated construction costs. The study will address tasks needed to refine roadway designs and determine appropriate future Federal, State, and local environmental review and permitting 3 Study ComdOf r �F ,Y �y processes. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 9 LANDSCAPING The proposed telecommunications tower is situated among existing vegetation and attempts to reduce tree and vegetation removal as much as possible. Its placement will allow the majority of vegetation to remain and thereby help to screen the ground equipment and fence. The applicant has provided eight Black Hills spruce for landscape screening of the base. LIGHTING Lighting is not shown on the site plan. Towers shall not be illuminated by artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state authority for a particular tower. SIGNAGE The applicant has not shown any signage plans. No signage, advertising or identification of any kind intended to be visible from the ground or other structures is permitted, except applicable warning and equipment information signage required by the manufacturer or by Federal, State, or local authorities. GRADING/DRAINAGE Minimal grading is proposed. The proposed access will follow the existing grades. Some brush will be cleared to accommodate the driveway, tower and accessory equipment. MISCELLANEOUS The contractor shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. COMPLIANCE TABLE - IOP DISTRICT Ordinance Proposed Tower Height 150 feet 149 feet (including a 4 -foot lightning rod) Tower Setback N-150' E-75' N-150' E-150'* S-150' W-150' S -W W-680' Variances Required None Highway 101 is proposed to be realigned. The preferred alignment will shift the highway approximately 100 feet closer to the tower. Section 20-1505. Setbacks. (4) of the city code states "Towers shall be set back from all planned public rights-of-way by a minimum distance equal to one-half of the height of the tower, including all antennas and attachments. " Staff is recommending the tower be moved an additional 25 feet to the west. The tower will remain in conformance when the Highway is realigned. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 10 FINDINGS Site Plan Findings In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the City shall consider the developments compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; C. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations Much may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 11 Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the design requirements, the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, and the site plan review requirements. The site design is compatible with its surroundings. It is functional. Conditional Use Permit Findings When approving a conditional use permit, the City must determine the capability of a proposed development with existing and proposed uses. The general issuance standards of the conditional use Section 20-232, include the following 12 items: Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. Finding: The proposed tower will provide a basic utility to the area The fence will provide security. 2. Will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter. Finding: The proposed use is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan and generally complies with city ordinance requirements. 3. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. Finding: The proposed tower complies with city ordinance requirements. The lower portion of the tower including the equipment will be screened by vegetation. Staff is recommending the tower be painted a color that will allow it to blend into the sky. 4. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. Finding: The proposed tower will not be hazardous to existing or planned neighboring uses. 5. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. Finding: Will be served adequately by facilities and services provided by the persons responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. 6. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 12 Finding: Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. It will provide a necessary utility. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. Finding: The proposed tower should not create conditions that are detrimental to persons property or the general welfare of the community. 8. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. Finding: The proposed development will not interfere with traffic circulation. 9. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. Finding: The proposed development will not destroy or damage natural, scenic, or historic features. 10. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area. Finding: The proposed tower will be aesthetically compatible with the area. 11. Will not depreciate surrounding property values. Finding: The proposed development should not depreciate surrounding property values. 12. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article. Finding: The proposed development will meet standards established for communication towers. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommends the Planning Geffiiniss City Council adopt the following motions: Site Plan Review n r �%0l1 "The Nanning "nun'ssien fe a ' ` ` City uncil ap ves Site Plan Review #07-04 for a 149 -foot telecommunication tower and a oot c ence with -1 r _ shown on the site plan received January 19, 2007, subject to the fo g conditions: T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 13 The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement and submit financial security to guarantee the improvements. 2. Clearing for the tower and equipment pad shall be no greater than 15 feet from the edge of the pad. A maximum of 25 feet is allowed for clearing the access road to the site. Trees shall be preserved to the greatest extent possible. 4. The applicant shall install a minimum of eight Black Hills spruce around the equipment platform. Trees shall be at least six feet in height. 5. Site grading and vegetation removal shall be minimized to the greatest extent practical. If any excess material is anticipated to be generated as a result of access road construction, the disposal location must be approved in writing by City staff prior to road construction. 6. A rock construction entrance complying with the City's standard detail (#5301) shall be included on the Erosion and Grading Plan and shall be constructed prior to the remainder of the gravel road. 7. If applicable, the applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. (Watershed district and MPCA permits are necessary if the total disturbed area is in excess of 1.0 acres). 8. The monopole/tower shall be moved 25 feet to the west for a total setback of 175 feet and maintain a minimum of 150 -foot setback from the north, west and south property lines. 9. The driveway off of Creekwood Drive may not be used to serve nor access the Halla Nursery commenchd operation. 10. Building Official Conditions: a. A building permit is required to construct the tower and equipment platform; the tower must be designed for a wind load of 90 MPH for 3 seconds (ref. 2000 113C, Sec. 1609) and include the effect of one-half inch of radial ice (ref. MSBC 1303.1800). b. The plans (tower and platform) must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota." Conditional Use Permit P 6 VOJ / "The Platining Commissien FeearrHaerids appFOVal of the City Council appr Conditional Use Permit #07-04 for a 149 -foot telecommunication towerand f t n wi ar� ofb�vire as shown on the site plan received January 19, 2 7, subject to the following conditions: T -Mobile USA Planning Case 07-04 March 20, 2007 Page 14 I. The applicant shall enter into a conditional use permit agreement and submit financial security to guarantee the improvements. 2. The tower shall comply with the requirements in ARTICLE XXX. TOWERS AND ANTENNAS of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The tower shall not be illuminated by artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state authority for a particular tower. 4. No signage, advertising or identification of any kind intended to be visible from the ground or other structures is permitted, except applicable warning and equipment information signage required by the manufacturer or by Federal, State, or local authorities. 5. The applicant shall submit documentation at the time of building permit application showing the height above grade for all potential mounting positions for co -located antennas and the minimum separation distances between antennas. A description of the tower's capacity, including the number and type of antennas that can be accommodated should also be provided. 6. The monopole color shall be the brand ` Tnemac" and the color "Blue Elusion". All outdoor storage associated with the Halla Nursery and located within Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the tower and the area shall be revegetated." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Application. 3. Extension Letter dated February 6, 2007. 4. Letter from applicant. 5. Co -location letter from Don Halla dated September 12, 2006. 6. Letter from Cingular dated February 26, 2007. 7. Letter from MnDOT. 8. Affidavit of Mailing and Property Owners List. 9. Plans received January 19, 2007. g\plan\2007 planning cases\07-04 t -m bile\staff reportAm CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION LIM,= Application of T -Mobile for a Conditional Use Permit #2007-04 and Site Plan approval for a 145 -foot Telecommunication Tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod. On March 20, 2007, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of T -Mobile for a conditional use permit and site plan approval for the property legally described as Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, located west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed conditional use and site plan that was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned A-2, Agricultural Estate District. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential Large Lot (2.5 Acre Minimum 1/10 acre outside of MUSA). 3. The legal description of the property is: Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition. 4. Section 20-232: a. Will not be detrimental to or enhance the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. b. Will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. f. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. h. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. j. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. Will not depreciate surrounding property values. 1. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article. 5. Section 20-110: (a) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (b) Consistency with this division; (c) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; (d) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (e) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 2 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (f) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 6. The planning report #2007-04 dated March 20, 2007, prepared by Sharmin Al-Jaff, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the conditional use permit. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 20a' day of March, 2007. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman Planning Case No. O -� — v l CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Applicant Name and Address: Owner Name and Address: 1—t•^� 7�t�j g (O conc,((c ._s (3t0 Cy_w6kl_ I MF( 653(jR Contact: v Contact: l( Phone: Fax:642 6T 3(36 Phone:?9y— (a4;— Fax:— Email: e_ ax:Email:SrHe s-Qgy IG"rob. 3 Email: NOTE: Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Interim Use Permit (IUP) Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review (SPR)* Subdivision* Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-WaylEasements (VAC) Variance (VAR) Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign — $200 (City to install and remove) X Escrow -for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost'* - W �CUUIVSPR/VACNARNVAP/Metes & Bounds -�f5tT? nor SUB C1:-4;i,�� `t ZS TOTAL FEES c e_*i t �-1 Z 750 Se 0 An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. *Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/2" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 (*.tif) format. "Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT NAME, LOCATION: �oVf{ 1[�fXX7( ifre% i �c(y s✓rif LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TOTAL ACREAGE: WETLANDS PRESENT: YES J NO PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATIC REASON FOR REQUEST= This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owners Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or 1 am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. l nat a of ice / Date Signature of Fee Owner Dat6 G9pLANVo M[]eveloprrent Review Applieation.DOC Rev. 12105 SCANNED 6 -Ci d. f 1i- C Shatmeen AI-daff City of Chauhassrn 7700 Market Blvd 7700 Box 147 C hanhassea bIN : 531 i February 6, 2007 Re: T Mobile CUP Application for the location near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd. Sharmeen, To allow the City of Chanhassen additional time to gather information concerning T Mobile's request for a 145' monopole to be located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, please remove T Mobile's application from the February 2e City Council Agenda. T Mobile will request that the application be placed on the April 9`b agenda, with a determination no later then April 130' . Please let me know if you have any questions. 06 teve Edwar s Site Acquisition Agent 612 702 5065 (set W'OY 6 f v'o1M (ife January 12, 2007 Sharmeen Al-Jaff City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd 7700 Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Conditional Use Permit Application for a Telecommunications Facility to be Located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, Minnesota Dear Sharmeen Al-Jaff, I am submitting this letter on behalf of T -Mobile USA, which is applying for a Conditional Use Permit for its planned construction, operation, and maintenance of a communications tower facility to be located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 55318. This letter provides a general overview of the project, including its need and its design. I. Contact Information Applicant T -Mobile USA 8000 West 781s Street Suite 400 Edina, MN 55439 Agent for Applicant Steve Edwards 501 50a' Street West Minneapolis, MN 55419 Property Owner Donald Halla 10,000 Great Plains Blvd Chaska, MN 55318 Agent for Property Owner Same as Applicant I1. Location and Description of the Property The subject of the Conditional Use Permit application (the "Subject Property") is located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, Minnesota. The plat name is Halla Maryanna Addition. The Subject Property is zoned Agricultural Estate District. The property is located west of Great Plains Blvd and north of Creekwood Drive. III. Proposed Use T -Mobile USA proposes erecting a 145' monopole to enhance T -Mobile's digital network nationwide and particularly, in the area of southern Chanhassen. Specifically, T - Mobile seeks to improve coverage along Pioneer Trail (Hwy 14), Flying Cloud Drive (Hwy 212) and Great Plains Blvd (Hwy 10 1) for current and future T -Mobile subscribers. In addition, T -Mobile USA intends to solicit other telecommunications carriers to locate their equipment on the proposed monopole. This will reduce the need for other towers in the area, while providing other carriers sufficient height on the proposed monopole to enhance their networks. Cingular Wireless has submitted a collocation application and requested to be added to T -Mobile's zoning drawings. I believe they are prepared to install on the tower once approved and an agreement has been worked out for their ground equipment. IV. Proposed Tower The overall height of the proposed monopole will be 145' feet with a 4 -foot lightning rod. A monopole is a single shaft tower with no guyed wires, pursuant to zoning regulations; the monopole will be able to accommodate four (4) carriers. T -Mobile will have equipment at the base of the monopole (the "Facility"). The equipment will be enclosed by a six-foot chain link fence, with three (3) strands of barbed wire around the top for protection. There will be no advertising on the tower. Once the tower is constructed, vehicles will visit the site for maintenance purposes approximately once a month. The proposed Facility will be unmanned, and it will operate continuously. No sewer or water service is required for operation of the tower. V. Why and How This Location was Chosen A. Process for Developing a Site If T -Mobile believes that there may be a need to increase coverage in a particular area, its Radio Frequency (RF) Engineers first generate propagation studies using certain predication tools to determine whether there is a need for a cellular site in a specific area and how effectively a proposed cell site would provide coverage to a certain area. If, based on the propagation study, T -Mobile's RF engineers determine that there is a need for a new site, the RF engineers next identifies a Search Ring. A Search Ring is a geographic area in which potential sites may be located to effectuate the maximum amount of coverage in a service -poor area. RF Engineers identify a Search Ring based on several criteria, including coverage and capacity needs, topography, and locations of other T -Mobile sites. After a Search Ring is identified, T Mobile employs a site acquisition specialist to locate possible sites within the Search Ring. Typically, a site acquisition specialist first looks for potential collocation sites within the Search Rings, in order to minimize the cost of new construction and to meet the spirit and intent of local regulations that encourage collocation in order to minimize the number of towers in a jurisdiction. If no suitable collocation sites can be identified within the Search Ring, the site acquisition specialist next looks at options for building a new tower which would meet the local regulations and provide the best location for future collocators, while also providing T -Mobile with the coverage and capacity needed in the area. B. Technical Reason for Developing a Site To address coverage needs, RF engineers separate the entire network into geographic cells or coverage areas. The size of each cell varies depends on demographics, terrain, and antenna limitations. At the center of each existing cell is a Base Transceiver Station (BTS). The BTS consists of the antennas, transmitters, receivers, power amplifiers, and signal processing hardware. Basically, the BTS is a network component that provides the connection between a user's mobile handset and either another mobile user's handset or the traditional wired network system in our homes and businesses. Wireless phones generally need to "see" a cell site for proper transmission and reception. Thus, all of these technologies are governed by line -of -sight limitations. The distance between geographic cell sites differs greatly depending on the demographics. For instance, in highly populated areas, cell sites may need to be as close together as Ile of a mile; whereas in rural areas, the sites may be as much as 5 miles apart because a given site can handle a finite number of calls during peak hours. Thus, the more dense the surrounding population, the smaller the service area will be for a single site. Other factors to be considered in system design are the terrain, elevation, ground clutter, and foliage. C. Reason for Selecting the Subject Property near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd After generating a propagation study, T -Mobile's RF engineers identified a coverage and capacity need in the Great Plains Blvd area in November of 2005. The RF engineers then identified a Search Ring that would improve the coverage, assuming a suitable location could be identified. T -Mobile next asked a site acquisition agent to search the area for existing towers that could be utilized for collocation. When none were found, T -Mobile determined that a new tower would have to be built to provide coverage and capacity to the area. The location near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd was selected as the best location to meet the regulations of the City of Chanhassen and provide the best location for future collocators, while also providing T -Mobile with the coverage and capacity need in the area. D. Consumer and Wireless Technology Today, there are more then 205 million wireless subscribers in the United States compared to just 24 million in 1994. Customers are taking advantage of cutting-edge wireless content and service that help people stay connected to family and friends. Many people are dropping their wire line phones altogether and using their wireless devices exclusively. Wireless phones and data devices allow consumers to do so much more then ever before. In addition to being vital personal and public safety tools, many wireless devices can new be used to send and receive e-mail and text messages, make purchase and even track a user's location during an emergency. While T -Mobile and other wireless companies spend billions of dollars each year to improve wireless network quality and provide the best possible service, there is more work to be done and challenging obstacles to overcome. Coverage area must be improved and network capacity expanded to handle the growing number of calls and wireless data usage. T - Mobile and other companies are working to improve services where consumers are increasingly using their phone and data devices — at home and in their neighborhoods. E. Conclusion Since T -Mobile began developing its network in Minnesota in 1996, cell phones have become a necessity, and in recent years have began employ a growing number of applications, such as text messaging PDAs, email, photos, and video clips. With this new growth, the need for new telecommunication sites has grown as well. If approved, the proposed tower to be located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd will provide the Great Plains Blvd area with the quality of service T -Mobile's customers have come expect. Should you have any additional questions or if I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stephen Edwards Site Acquisition Specialist T -Mobile USA 612-702-5065 Sec. 20-109. Applications. Application for a site plan review shall be made to the city planner on forms provided by the city and shall be filed 30 days in advance of the planning commission meeting at which it is to be considered. Incomplete or deficient applications shall not be scheduled for a meeting unless the community development director has determined that official action is warranted. The application shall also include: (1) Evidence of ownership or an interest in the property; The memorandum of Lease Agreement is included in the application. (2) The application fee; and Included with the application (3) Complete site plans, signed by a registered architect, civil engineer, landscape architect or other design professional, to include the following: Mike Hatchy, Saint Croix Engineering License Number 17852 (4) General: a. Name of project. AlP0902 Halla b. Name, address, and telephone number of applicant, engineer, and owner of record. Designer— Chris Miller, T -Mobile Engineer— Mike Hatchy, Saint Croix Engineering c. Legal description (certificate of survey will be required). Halla Maryanna Addition Out lot A d. Date proposed, north arrow, engineering scale, number of sheets, name of drawer. Please see construction drawings e. Vicinity map showing relationship of the proposed development to surrounding streets, rights-of-way, easements and natural features. Please see Carver GIS Map included in the application f. Description of intended use of the site, buildings, and structures including type of occupancy and estimated occupancy load. Please see application cover letter, No building proposed, zero occupancy g. Existing zoning and land use. Agriculture Estate, No existing land use h. Tabulation box indicating: 1. Size of parcel in acres and square feet. 12.4 acres — Approximately 552, 720sf 2. Gross floor area of each building. Not Applicable 3. Percent of site covered by building. Not Applicable — With tower and equipment less than 1 4. Percent of site covered by impervious surface. With tower and equipment less than 1% 5. Percent of site covered by parking area. Less then 1 6. Projected number of employees. Zero 7. Number of seats if intended use is a restaurant or place of assembly. Zero 8. Number of parking spaces required. One 9. Number of parking spaces provided including handicapped. Zero 10. Height of all buildings and structures and number of stories. Not Applicable 11. Breakdown of the building area allocated for specific uses, e.g., manufacturing, office, retail, showroom, warehouse, etc. Not Applicable (5) Site and building plan: a. Property line dimensions, location of all existing and proposed structures with distance from boundaries, distance between structures, building dimensions, and floor elevations. Please see construction drawings b. Grading and drainage plans showing existing natural features (topography, wetlands, vegetation, etc.), as well as proposed grade elevations and sedimentation and stormwater retention ponds. Plans shall include runoff and storage calculations for ten- year and 100 -year events. If stormwater is proposed to be routed to existing stormwater ponds, documentation shall be provided to demonstrate that the downstream pond is sufficient to accommodate the additional stormwater. Not Applicable c. All existing and proposed points of egress/ingress showing widths at property lines, turning radii abutting rights-of-way with indicated centerline, width, paving width, existing and proposed median cuts, and intersections of streets and driveways. Please see construction drawings d. Vehicular circulation system showing location and dimension for all driveways, parking spaces, parking lot aisles, service roads, loading areas, fire lanes, emergency access (if necessary), public and private streets, alleys, sidewalks, bike paths, direction of traffic flow, and traffic -control devices. Please see construction drawings e. Landscaping plan in accordance with the provisions of article XXV. Existing vegetation on the site exceeds standard landscaping, additional landscaping on construction drawings f. Location, access and screening detail of trash enclosures. Not Applicable g. Location and screening detail of rooftop equipment. Screening shall be provided from the perspective of a point six feet high at all adjacent property lines or from a distance of 250 feet, whichever is greater. Not Applicable h. Location and detail of signage including method of lighting, height, width, sign display area, etc. Not Applicable L Lighting location, style, mounting and photometrics. Not Applicable j. Building elevations from all directions indicating materials and colors. Interior floor plans may be required. Not Applicable k. Utility plan identifying size and direction of existing water and sewer lines, fire hydrants, distance of hydrant to proposed building. Not Applicable I. List of proposed hazardous materials, use and storage. Not Applicable m. Proposed fire protection system. Not Applicable n. Such other information as may be required by the city. o. Photocomposite images, artistic renderings, or site elevations which depict the visual impact of the proposed development's design, landscaping, street layout, signage, pedestrian ways, lighting, buildings, or other details that affect land use within the city shall be submitted. Such images and renderings shall be from key vantage points and provide an undistorted perspective of the proposed development from abutting properties, less intensive land uses, and/or from entryway locations. Photorealistic imaging or renderings are the appropriate level of resolution. Please see photo simulations (6) Within the HC districts, the application shall also include: a. Building elevations from all directions, indicating materials, colors and landscaping at installation. Please see construction drawings b. Building and site views from Highway 5, the appropriate access boulevard (north or south of Highway 5), and any other appropriate arterial or collector roadways. Not Applicable c. Site views showing the relationships of the proposed building or development to adjacent development, including buffered areas. Please see construction drawings d. Drawings of all significant or atypical site features, such as unusual landscaping, manmade water features other than retention ponds, outdoor sculpture, or other large- scale artwork and other uncommon constructs. Not Applicable e. Sample building materials. Please see photos included in the application f. Sample paving materials, upon the citys request. Not Applicable (7) Within the BCO district, the application shall also include: a. Identified boundaries of the primary zone and secondary zone on a drawing depicting existing conditions and on a site plan depicting the proposed development pattern. Please see construction drawings b. Calculations and/or drawings that identify the allowable density (number of units or building coverage) under this Code including lands lying in the primary and secondary zone. Calculation of allowable density shall specifically exclude lands classed as bluffs, floodplains and designated wetlands. Calculation of allowable impervious cover may include bluffs and floodplains but shall specifically exclude designated wetlands. Not Applicable (Ord. No. 119, 2-12-90; Ord. No. 203, § 2, 5-994; Ord. No. 212, § 4, 7-11-94; Ord. No. 286, § 6, 12-14-98; Ord. No. 315, § 1, 3-26-01; Ord. No. 377, § 15, 5-24-04) El Good Indoor Coverage ❑ Good Outdoor.Poor Indoor coverage ❑ Bad outdoor & Indoor Coverage hows location of both the candidates ❑ Good Indoor Covera0e ❑ Good OutdooriPoor Indoor coverage ❑ Bad outdoor & Indoor Coverage J ocation of the siren pole is in the decent outdoor coverage area, and with the height we can get with the siren ole replacement we can achieve marginal of what our objective is in this area as you can see area south of ie siren pole around pioneer trail is still left uncovered. it _v �_ •..i Good Indoor Coveraoe ❑ Good OutdoorlPoor Indoor coveraoe ® Bad outdoor & Indoor Coverage his shows the need to improving indoor coverage in the neighborhod around pioneer Trail. ❑Good Indoor Coverage y ❑ Good Outdoor.Poor Indoor coveraqe a ;: la,❑ Bad outdoor & Indoor Coverage ¢iA -1 U059A- 7 :<.��` ` ` ., - .dam <t C � �_i-�^•4� I - - ,s shown in the coverage plot with our current location at Halla Nursery we can cover larger area, thereby ddressing our coverage objective better. September 12,2006 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 RE: Cellular Tower Co -location / Letter of Intent City of Chanhassen, I have been working with T -Mobile on the placement of a 150' monopole on my property located along Great Plains Blvd; T -Mobile calls the project A1P902. This tower is being constructed to allow for (3) three additional carriers in addition to T -Mobile. From what I understand Cingular is interested in installing on the tower. I intend to allow additional co -locators to install on the tower after entering into a lease for the ground space. Should you have any additional questions or if I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. Sincgrely, 1 Don Halla 9521145-6555 St. Stephens SCANNED singular February 26,2007 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 To whom it may concern: This letter is to confirm it is Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("Cingular Wireless") intention to collocate on the communication tower that T -Mobile is proposing to build on the Halla Nursery property in Chanhassen, MN. A collocation application was submitted to T -Mobile for this purpose back in 2006. Please don't hesitate to call should you need any additional information. Sincerely, 'f Jason Hall Site Acquisition (On behalf of Cingular Wireless) Tele: 612.670.0101 #0,*_5o.4 Minnesota Department of Transportation A Metropolitan District Waters Edge orTMO 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113-3174 February 12, 2007 Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 FEB 14 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SUBJECT: T -Mobile Cell Tower site plan and conditional use permit Mn/DOT Review # S 07-009 Northwest quadrant of Trunk Highway (TH) 101 (Great Plains Blvd.) and Creekwood Drive City of Chanhassan/Carver County Control Section 1009 Dear Ms. Al-Jaff: Thank you for the opportunity to review the above -referenced � �si/t1-e� fp1Tlan� and conditional use permit application. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) Metro District has reviewed the above -referenced plan. Before any further development, please address the following comments: Preservation offuture highway right-of-way: Mn/DOT, Carver County, and the City of Chanhassen have been working on a TH 101 Scoping Study (covering Lyman Blvd. south to TH 212) for the last nine months (State Project # SP 1009-18). The purpose of the study is to identify a corridor location for a future TH 101 that includes safety improvements and additional capacity. Completing the study and officially mapping the corridor will allow the City to plan around this future corridor. The Scoping Study analyzed four different conceptual alignments and weighed the relative transportation benefits, potential environmental impacts (on a screening level) and costs. A Central alignment has been selected as the preferred alternative. This alternative primarily follows the existing alignment. The proposed cell phone tower site location is adjacent to this preferred alternative. It would be in the developer's and City's best interest to move the proposed T -Mobile cell tower and the future Cingular lease area as far west as feasible. This will increase the "clear zone" for the future improved TH 101 when that highway is constructed on the Central alignment. Environmental and historical constraints were identified on the east side of existing TH 101 as part of the Scoping Study. Moving TH 101 to the east will not be an option. For questions on these points, please call Diane Langenbach, Mn/DOT Metro District South Area, at (651) 582-1468. An equal opportunity employer Drainage. A drainage permit may be required. The proposed development will need to maintain existing drainage rates (i.e., the rate at which storm water is discharged from the site must not increase). The City or project developer will need to submit existing / proposed hydraulic computations for both 10 and 100 year rainfall events verifying that all existing drainage patterns and systems affecting Mn/DOT right of way will be perpetuated. Mn/DOT needs to be able to determine the change in discharge to the TH 101 right-of- way after the construction required for the cell tower. There is an eighteen inch (18) corrugated metal pipe under TH 101 that this site appears to flow to. Please provide drainage area maps, with arrows indicating direction of the flows. Discharge to the TH 101 right-of-way must not increase. Any work impacting Mn/DOT right-of-way will require a permit. For questions on these points, please call Derek Beauduy, Mn/DOT Metro District Water Resources Engineering, at (651) 634-2080, or e-mail him at derek.beauduy@dot.state.mn.us. Permits. As mentioned above, a drainage permit may be required. Any work impacting MnDOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/teeDp/utility. Please include one full-size plan set, and a 11 x 17 inch plan set for each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's 30 -day review and response process to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at (651)582-1462. Sincerely, %al -Ne ke l Mary McNeff Transportation Planner Copy: John Freemyer, Carver County Surveyor, Cologne, MN Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer, Cologne, MN Dave Drealan, Planning Department, Carver County, Chaska, MN Steve Edwards, T -Mobile USA, Minneapolis, MN CITY OF CHANHASSEN STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on March 8, 2007, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for the T -Mobile Cell Tower — Planning Case 07-04 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this Wl" day of t'11arc.h 12007. -Not aryubl' KIM T. MEUWISSEN V, Notary Public -Minnesota .„i My Cwnmission Expires Jen 31, 2070 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening,depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit Proposal: for the construction of a 145 -foot cell tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod, and to allow a fence over 6Y2 feet in height Applicant: T -Mobile West of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, Property south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course Location: (Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition) A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/sery/plan/07-04.htmI. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen Questions & AI-Jaff by email at saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone Comments: at 952-227.1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as apart of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerclaVlndustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersontrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be Included In the report, lease contact the Planning Stall person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit Proposal: for the construction of a 145 -foot cell tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod, and to allow a fence over 61/2 feet in height Applicant: T -Mobile West of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, Property south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course Location: (Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition) A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/sery/plan/07-04.html. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen Questions & AI-Jaff by email at saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone Comments: at 952-227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department In advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation, Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerclalAndustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a connotation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and Is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City tices not represent Naz me GIS Data can be used for navigational, lrwWng or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. 9 errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding declaimer is proNded pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map Wismatedges that the City shall not be liable fa any darrages, ark er,ressty mives all dans, antl agrees to defend, indermify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the users access or use of data omvided. This map is neither a legally recorded map bar a survey and is not intended to be used as ons. This nap is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, sate and federal offices ark other sources regan➢ng the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes rarity. The City does not woman Oat the Geographic information, System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are armor tree, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used fa ravgational, treciting a any other purpose requiring exadirg measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. ff errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding dsdamer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (200(1), and the user of this map acluwvdedges Oat the City shelf rat be liable la any damages, ark eVressly waves all dams, and agrees to defend, indemnity, and hold hamiess the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or fluid paNes which arse out ol the users access or use of data provided. JAMES W SABINSKE HARRY E NIEMELA GARY & DEBRA ANDERSON 775 CREEKWOOD 9700 LAKETOWN RD 725 CREEKWOOD CHASKA, MN 55318 -9621 CHASKA, MN 55318 -4513 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9621 ALBERT & SARAH J AVEDIKIAN DANIEL SCHAITBERGER & BRUCE W PAUL 10220 MANDAN CIR CATHERINE A SCHAITBERGER 10240 MANDAN CIR CHASKA, MN 55318 -9401 10241 MANDAN CIR CHASKA, MN 55318 -9401 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9402 BLUFF CREEK GOLF ASSOC THOMAS J & KATHLEEN R GERTZ DAVID R TEICH 1025 CREEKWOOD DR 10001 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 1217 MONROE ST S CHASKA, MN 55318 -9647 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9466 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 -2062 DONALD E HALLA 8 DALE ALAN GUNDERSON & SANDRA J CWAYNA HALLA 10151 WALTER & CHRIS ADT DEBRA LYNN JENSEN CHASKA 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD GREE AT PLAINS BLVD 845 CREEKWOOD DR CHASKA, MN 55318 -9465 CHASKA , MN 55318 -9469 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9643 JEFFREY & KATHLEEN DYPWICK TERRY B & GAYE E CARLSON TIMOTHY A & TERESA M VOEHL 10300 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 821 CREEKWOOD DR 770 CREEKWOOD DR CHASKA, MN 55318 -9467 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9643 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9620 MARYANNE M WHITE ANNE & CLARA VOGEL MARK D & KAY M HALLA 670 CREEKWOOD DR 815 CREEKWOOD DR 6055 HWY 212 CHASKA, MN 55318 -1149 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9643 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9250 SPENCER L & GLORIA A BOYNTON RENEE L STRICKLAND RICHARD T HALVER TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 10251 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 10271 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 777 CREEKWOOD CHASKA, MN 55318 -9468 CHASKA. MN 55318 -9468 CHASKA. MN 55318 -9621 ANTHONY & TINA SWANSON 10260 MANDAN CIR CHASKA, MN 55318 -9401 Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) T -Mobile Cell Tower Planning Case No. 07-04 City of Chanhassen SCANNED VICINITY MAP PROJECT DATA " ® e�waar• wn.wn Pwiw l'SSL'"]w QD sTs Mobl*le y GENERAL NOTES SCOPE OF SUPPLY PROJECT TEAM tea tt�_;� yy� ,. ,1[ (plMfl�w w�[Y�x9 x� Mr�ifn -'PTN YI IIMw` i,• MmY i mf M a W W(p y 1yp�'p I�w�IAp �q pl•IIM md.IWMI Iw[R. w�4m�}q m � „W m Imirc�MwMY [I�[ m �m.1�O p AM 1A[ P�M.M 1,nlm. Bili �m � [i �n N� mw wo w[ fAKOGir Wit em .�I�aQ WE9i MvwaMRw w M 0V. µaw�ryn�PW, w pmmµiMyllVO,w •�[ ,ww,.a mrw a'oi@d'M"°m""' W .wi°,_mapw�..w,wy� �v pts .OM'. fllw Ilwl '"w}n'xeiw "w�r.M� i `w,^""1w� , mirm�Is NMI&= SITE DIRECTIONS �wwmmr�. M.`r P!"'i °"_Wl O[ ,�R YwnqGOPHER w A[.�O. �IrW rm PM4'I.m xY �wtWA�T' meq. v}M]n ,R . �ryM.[ (OIMO, Ymll w/, AWa STATE ONE CALL�MQ ABBREVIATIONS DRAWING INDEX mPM�W ."P arva`aa. aw.wm °°""1'°'°" �•"�+°' CODES AND STANDARDS •. w w wap1jpM"'P.a'"'p°m xmn s ,w Mw,o aM. ewmw w cu i w q .[M WLL u moo .,Mieawm PwMn`]`M PWllm O.wt n „N W sorts � .Mtn � aw ao w �a • PnaW w,w uJ.e m mo. ur m„w w.v.eo .www4`aM ¢YP. ,w .wLLmw�ilwymp upy,Wyw yp� ,• Yxbww'L [pAmMKPawO Ar^dL .a.mmww wPw mmwPm.w. mw. Wn,K,.m,.mrw Mw .Pmn . n,w m w � uM. mwx w n. ,.w.n.wMu� '"x" u 4 uvnimrvrtl �o,umum WARN Tft N ]If[ ROOft01 wit Ww i wwiiawp [w[,m n im .Mexm v,.xm n 4 i1 � wW � ,-Ww[ n tlYlw]TC. wN IU,IYY -YM[ P m„Miw T. Mmr(I i. uA P`�"e� xo�wmia,M mmsl nn„w m�,�a[v Man�n,w M41O www mo N, r � mmme. M0 �w[wnw rm �.wil.rxnnp ww y � (,�� m�.�p�l � �r �m � •nPwiww w, t-xaw[ rupnw www rtl.[ OMAnw, M1wN -Mw[ MwPw �� 0� "gym �� -� � � ww�gn c`ii � w � .�Nfa�ma"O`� wn: WmK,u w �wri ivn wwt w, n`m Yi 4Wi Iw] wAVM pi.x W1n �mn�• � q iYWw .new �m'mar Mme[: PPM ;Il M6 pj1j® m�Wy � w`wi wp wW®• '"['@A .ea, .w,m m ww. wm Wornm":w w,em ow.m : lOv mw�ww�w�. v. - IN -.aOxn w, NNnI• w, l OwVN nM. n[,yw - m lN' MW^•^�^im www •]wwe ewxP rW . � w {)j 4 wOw m Y[,iwm, MOfiIM � - [[Ol I�) - nwm Wits. eva�xMfM .rwYw - M (,] - �� 0V wILNw, � Mn mwwa .ww Me LEGEND a� . � m m 'eq 9 a aA i n<mnN.,P, M ml'aC"wM�i MMIPew a [cab PNLP wMn mY. ,Mw �U wn6. E. M`�rwaw wy �� d[ p°'sm,ers wr w[wn Cppwxp Myew wM w aww xoo.a. mxaaPw w I TAIiw•wa, Pxne.w�e„aa. rW,w.na mnaa,w , m,� •m• ,firma Iw,IW`�W ��iiw. w ms,wm wlaw m 10' v r""MP V qmP 4 nww - xs u] - � � rM� .Dews view-M1,]-miiwmiar. vwVw-1,.1,1-m�ww.�m� `� nwnwP�iP - u ��I � mw mwwr�P.Oiw 1 vNM ww[(mrw wtl (•N'Nm9ew, Lm mNOmli • w wi Niwo w�P �� wMrw'°"n"'O wr A ION ,m wm.el. wm m - •IM mwP.P'f�9 w Y OMYMI� w MI iww'r^ wwr.u.Y�.. NAI.LA NURSPAY • • T • Mobile .Mp1`1PnMmm' "s^x �'°1`01°'� .y�� m� °,e"�m aFSMPw a5�" w' wew•w' _ �.,ww was " M '/"w' A1PNN2 PROJECT INFQ AOENERAL NOTES i WAr N.wa mnWiw laaoo aNur .[Aws eiw. exaN�ssw. urNawrA AfINNEAPOLIS MARKET p wPe wP.N wa SCANNED ® n I / \ \ HALAA NURSERYC. I II \ Nov wile f/ iW! oris' � w N —------------,i I � nw®1148 I w - - - - ---------- - -- - - - 9� 0 ------------- gin —FAL l . sem` o L. Ilr.�.er� wr.. +.+u..�w + NRLLA NURSERY SAW wma w6�Ti� wu.�YnY°, rsr „l A1M2 . T..Mobile•• •.�'^"" +' SMEPLm nwl•Y CWWM�45FX, NINNE901r � �AIM02-Cl i MINNEAPOLIS MARKET ` " I SCANNED ® n _ INITIY WOSI RA•I YV �-W�•.c/A �4 N —R •-------------------------------------------------------------- a .1 pa ---------,r-- ------ �- �� im .n.N. w• w _ _ I � —-------------J 8 a OENWIDED SITE 4-M ~ _ rirs� s� ..�.N. YNR � " HALLA NURSERY A/PEW �� MW+ • • T .. Mobiles '�"m ..__ : = ENLARGED WE ULAN WE LAN i _ •�� loom DGED CN.WNAS , M NMTA _ q i �A1PE01re I MINNEAPOLIS MARKET �� SCANNED SCAT NE" GOPHER STATE ONE CALL —PLANT SCHEDULE N.N LANDSCAPE NOTES i % i awNmw.Y._wN—w.mR - i -----------------� "^ -GENERAL NOTES / \ �.L�—Ar.wR,PAMIw YL YAT LLUM. M.1VCm,IMMNIYY OMMC1Y1Mn OTP.II. M VY (N�-...-pql ,.� m.OMI MX� Ilruvl •I ,yam 'y INOWq.MXYONtoTRNY'MO nNn.N NIW1YF Nn 0.A ftlMNr RaYtw OM1 y.•W�f2 Ne/N pN.'�r.ti w.rs w mw u ,ymgyrm.T a M www apl�M.. �.r.1pwVYMP�ws'R.Y.�IWr�N MppN NI.W iYnWfRM MPNI V IVr �MNILVW[ MMpRP IIIO�"m M'�/L N�w1OYL Y.nMW k..O.Oid w0. MVNL. i@mN N M 1.aF/[ n M....r.. nNNa+N .wN m M.NRn s.. w,v aAxw 0 .wMnrMp�w.w<r.N.r.w,wwYAwM..wr®,.NNR,.. ,•.rNM r.NWILLINMR PpMttitW— i ' . uxosawxc� �s ro N.nr.n. r..— wY. rm .a.rA x mNuw N.MxmMi. �i ®MYI. N116I a../1M N. W YriXw. No M Y M..Ud Y01..NN WIIX -DECIDUOUS TREES -CONIFEROUS TREES -PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS i 5 • ni..r.X �Ae 1O1P •.mm w.o.m rw N.a xeim NM.. '' Nw""'"'°i. �w�°Y.rmoq"Niw n, v.N. �. w..,um m. wnY mn a �r nNNNn 1NpO0Yyw— Y@YN6 rW NNM MO YO M�6 WNNI1L iNlLL IO. n lMY.OIIW M.MVW[,IYmIWK V.M 11MF i'NMN. nllt iR.�l. �IMA�IOOYLI. mNM.1. MVA o,Y nMw.R Yu.w_ A1PIM.IN4 Ml NN W1OWl nXLRM1.IY®WMY!<YI NX wO MK N.INOM A m11MM. M41m IIR IlRN4M0IINC1N0 wid,P.Y.1 Y6 N .Px M RWIM 6 M M tlANNN � � mRM,.O rI.I11M rIN1Yi 11rNgwl M yWp�MyW. yp�y� • Rr. M M IMAfM rIV1 W. fNYNII �I4P' Ne AM�IM IM ri"A'1 Yn ® ,,�f' ww�N N �NMw ONirpWO�®im N�i..Y� X fOnv wm IM Ma 4R M.Lv�y�`M _1Mp1Y lYWf.m AnYl y�pyry.MM� 1[u00NA '�'V'�'V Y. M�NwX. ln..l MMM..�Mw1Y II Vr�YMrt ypNwllq—. .W1pi.O iMRL �N M N M r1m.Y11 NUM6 rAOw VwILi �Nt VYWY R .Ilwld. gTTIM N rY""o'"`a .'V'ri`:mw,"+a" rTN4m n'Ni.Y4r"'x°a°mi°.-4`M'"'piaMu""'�"wrM.10'.•mi —SHRUB�a —PLANTING NOTES -6R r4 nN. nVZ WM1..YwMNMwFiw w. rp NY1N.nMNNN[A. YNR _ •Y yRwiMmiwN1. and VM. TR.0wr1.IN.tl nM1_wN Va.R.IrsTmw u.��Y'NW NMMi wG-Y® �,VM IMiwIYv NO. n.NMa-YR4 Y,M�IR.IYM W Mn.Mio w. CaNRZ firm rN�wmx. wNN.e mmn.Xr M.immn M. Mue n.XxNMrN i� y, f aLL IM,mf MNN r..P 11N11W TN4 ' � Y�1'. N' 9RM .I wSf �p.p miM � 41CMNwR.,MX.RMi 6il.gm��M.iNN�. IM�m—'� {NIMI.P k ; Nswa NN.. ,—LL4N1. mrxx..IxN r1IMr. Naww M..Mm MwrA e NALLANURSERY ^� •mow'°' "$ AIPYOP LANDSWNIO PLAN NiA• w.A mnwNiw w'/"M . T..Mobile� i0000 wui R,uxs eLw, i i —A CWNW.gV. YWXfSOi. @@ w +++ r—AIPW2R MINNEAPOLIS MARKET �" � i SCAT NE" aa..mrz rzrarm. / u uarm ' GRAVEL WIVE SECTION k9ii2q•— :NURGED SITE PUN • T • •Mobilee MINNEAPOISS MARKET GOPHERSTATE CALI NMwI rrva T � uCTA L.r W foR ^ T iFuLCE 'C��0.F°"u rumse%7-$IxYSSPr �wwTSr vm. m.ws.�.w _veru vsa w`°r Su wrivvwvw mr v u vera.®.w+m'wi.�m^i HALLA NURSERY AIM2 EROSION AND GRADING PLAN iO MOT %NNS BLVD. LNWIµ55[N. MINNESOU SCANNED SCANNED ,w 4 i w .r.•xm �pk ,w.w mM IbW W iWmf,CY. M,i ./Nw,CI. t/IrE 1 �w '• w , N• mu w nw r m , w w+w. '• u ,w , N' ,rlx u[ r ,w , w PI •xE W ,w,w 1.1 •P • � � ..qp W la ,m �. 14TV . I41.M MWaW iOr N R/CYE .I,+O Ir +P YMn. w(6VTW.M..P Mm ,. MI. W! M....pY�fpMMRrt r.Pr EEIEm rP aE.. x morrmParmE Prw � �AEE.wm. m PYuirO FHER� ® C IM6 � 1 M�O.PP M I[Ytx. -Prx r EP w e. f m N..Er ra.mM .sn. IW iP.[mf N1O. MN ogmw"` tlW ,Y4 NY..WM.RIP P A CR M. YMLfIC�C lI � PW"'P[fYCE�I 1 T III Lx •1.. R I OM OM 1911 .VIIDIMA MKERIAYR mt .a V irl, Pt W EY.Ywr E.a,on® Y' aME•N wUrN ELEVATIo ENURGED ELEVATIQN NALLA NUR.ERY i �NN+ wmMm�wrnP r'/"T "°m °"'�10 i. rur MO r%ws�. w. """P"~.. EE.+ ww AIPM •".^E eEE�=, AWMU WF0. L TOWER ELEVAMN B .:I:..Mobilee _ IOYLO TP N$mw '?C `E�Ca in'ETi.M mw Eo ,f'im CNWIW9pA NIHN60fA �� Y �ptPiDE•At MINNEAPOLIS MARKET :. t @ SCANNED ,w 4 i w .r.•xm �pk ,w.w mM iWmf,CY. M,i ./Nw,CI. t/IrE 1 SCANNED ,w i w .r.•xm ,w.w mM �w Inm �w '• , N• mu r m , w w+w. '• u ,w , N' ,rlx u[ r ,w , w PI •xE W ,w,w 1.1 •P SCANNED SCANNED NEW U11UP/ SEIIYIOC �•�� ONE - UNE DViRVAI �' mW">i°w`�oucym mm mr O STANDARD (S,O✓) a mm.�m4ym mro m m rm ua.o W a �inwvi m m m.e 'uid°a�ame. si��@wRaW.�o.a Mo mn.r rw "^.. ao.e� mn.snrPvewn �m wn..r Mm nm mrPa S• � __ wmn PAVP+ m.: mn � ,�� o gr i 31RIN0 Y• w.a P.... MIPY � i i Lv .S�OLL n0.V[ M O� � NINNY sp Mv�. OYu wY.. MMD P.. iYT i/f yL11N 11/ P6 m Y• Y1M.R + 011[ M A�wM�.0. wu �m POWEfl AHO ONWHO NC PIAN CY4 �i HAEEA NURSERY Nin Ma1MTnMMw � �r.or�4w .e a �C.aii ...as wv��rvr AIMS :I: +S.iF..woru� POWER AND OROUNDWO PIAN • • -MobilesM isoov rmAl vows eNw. i �— a`�iirwi� tlWiNS5D1. 41MXE50IA _AIPWaEt i MINNEAPOLIS MARKET " SCANNED o-7-oq Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2007 of buildings is 354,000 square feet. Parking stalls we have provisions for 1,512 parking stalls and requirement of the city would be 1,372. And we certainly exceed for the 2,400 seat worship center that requirement. So that was the main reason for being here was just because we know that development is occurring around our borders. We wanted to make sure that our intentions, at least as much as know them today, are known by the city and by anyone who would be interested in purchasing property or developing it adjacent to our property. So I really don't have too much more other than if you have questions about our intentions. McDonald: Have you had an opportunity to talk to the developer of that land to the south? Southwest of you there. Steve Mueller: I don't think we have, no. Tom Johnson is here too from Westwood. He's the Chair of the Leadership Board. Tom Johnson: We have actually had discussions with them prior to the master plan and it actually had to do more with the city sewer and water coming through. But as far as the relationship with Westwood and the developer, everything is just fine. McDonald: Okay. Tom Johnson: This was more of an informational purpose than anything. Keefe: What is your timing on, in terms of your next phases? Any sense on that? Tom Johnson: Well, you know that's up to funding as usual and we really don't have a specific plan. We're going to enter into another capital campaign drive that will start actually in 2008. So potentially you know, we really don't know as of yet so well see what happens as a result of that capital campaign drive. McDonald: Okay. Does anyone else have any questions? Okay well thank you so much for the update. Information and best of luck. PUBLIC HEARING: HALLA MARYANNE ADDITION, APPLICANT T -MOBILE, PLANNING CASE 07-04. Public Present: Name Address Claire Vogel 815 Creekwood 2 SCANNED Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2007 Gloria Boynton 777 Creekwood Anne Vogel 815 Creekwood Steve Edwards 50150"' Street West Bruce Paul 10240 Mandan Circle Tim Voehl 770 Creekwood Drive Sharmeen AI-Jaff presented the staff report on this item. McDonald: Kurt. Papke: Start with an obvious one. In terms of the city's discretion or guidance or comprehensive plan or zoning, is there any, what, how much is the phone, are the phone companies limited to where they can place these things? Now you already stated that it has to be, you did the one mile search around the subject area and there was nothing. Beyond that is there, are there any limitations or guidance in the comp plan? I mean, or are they free to put this anywhere they can find a big enough lot? Al-Jaff: Any time, we work very closely with any applicant that comes in and when it comes to antennas, I mean it's something that we take very seriously. We don't want to see a proliferation of towers throughout the city. One of the things that I didn't mention through my presentation but it's in the staff report, we require co -location of different providers and we know that Cingular is going to co -locate on this site. Another thing that I didn't show during my presentation is the dead zone of, there is a dead zone and I will ask the applicant to answer more on this issue. Tell you more about it. He explained it to me and when he did explain it I understood it perfectly. Papke: I think I understand the rationale you know from a signal coverage perspective why they want to put it where it is. My only question is, does the city have any leverage or any guidance on where we want it to be or any restrictions. A]-Jaff: Yes we do and the applicant has met all of those guidelines and restrictions. Papke: Okay. So legally they're perfectly empowered to put this where they're proposing to put it without any inhibitions? Okay. In regards to the condition of moving the tower, is it 25 feet west? Has the applicant indicated a willingness to move it to accommodate the 101 realignment or is this, where do we stand on that? Al-Jaff: They will. Papke: Okay, so I'll let the applicant, I'll ask again from the applicant's perspective. Al-Jaff: Nothing in the report should come as a surprise to the applicant. We communicated throughout the process. Papke: Okay. That's all I have. Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2007 McDonald: Kevin Dillon: What is the capacity of this tower in terms of, I know there's T -Mobile and then there's talk about Cingular putting extra antennas on it or whatever they're called. I mean you know, how many layers of antennas from a technical capacity and then like from a practical point of view too in terms of you know the mechanics of the weight on top of the tower. Al -Jaffa Absolutely. At the time of building permit they have to design the tower and submit these engineered plans to our building department to evaluate. Currently they are showing potentially four future carriers. No, three. Three in addition to T -Mobile. And we know Cingular is signing up to co -locate on this tower as well. So total of four and it will be engineered and reviewed by our building department to ensure that it's able to handle the weight of the antennas. Dillon: And so when that is submitted and approved by the building department, I mean can you go back and amend that at a future date to add more tiers of you know antennas, assuming that the weight and all that would work out? I mean if it could structurally support it. I mean because my concern, I don't want like antennas all up and down the thing. I mean it would look a little odd. I mean I know there's only so many cell service providers now but. Al-Jaff: Correct. But one of the things that we need to bear in mind is that there has to be separation between the different carriers. The waves cannot interfere with each other. And I have not seen more than 3 or 4 carriers on a single tower. Dillon: Is there going to be like a steps or like steps isn't the right word but a ladder you know for if like a service technician had to climb the tower to fix a broken wire or something up top? Al -Jaffa Yes, there will be. Steve Edwards: I can elaborate on that. Dillon: Maybe I'll save some of my questions that are more for the builder. Al -Jaffa Yes, the detail questions dealing with the tower, yes please. Dillon: Okay, and so then how did, so you found the discrepancy in the way that the Halla parking lot was, okay. Al -Jaffa Correct. Dillon: And so was that disclosed to you when you were doing this or did you like uncover that? Al-Jaff: I uncovered. Dillon: And so then now, so part of the condition of this getting approved in, or I think you said or just regardless, you have to fix it. 0 Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2007 Al-Jaff: Regardless, this has to be fixed. Dillon: Just curious, what's their reaction to that? I mean were they like. AI-Jaff: They haven't said anything but it will get, it's an illegal expansion and it has to cease and desist. Dillon: And what's the relationship between Halla and the applicant? Al-Jaff: The applicant is leasing property from Halla Nursery. From Don Halla. Don Halla owns Outlot A, as well as Halla Nursery. Dillon: Okay. That's all the questions I have for now. McDonald: Kathleen. Thomas: I'm good. I have a couple questions for the applicant so I'll wait, thank you. McDonald: Debbie. Larson: Well I have a question regarding the height of the tower. That seems really high. Is that normal? Al-Jaff: Yes. Larson: Because I mean I've see them along the highway and freeways and stuff and I'm sure they're not 145 feet high. Or is it because of where it is in the landscape? Al-Jaff: Terrain. The word that the applicant used when he was trying to explain all of this to me was signals have to see each other and as such the terrain comes into play and that would also decide the height of the tower. Larson: Okay. Let's see here. You answered that one. Barbed wire. Is that a necessary item on this fence? Al-Jaff: The applicant feels that it's an added, a security measure. This is an Agricultural Estate District and barbed wire is permitted in that. Larson: I mean for animals or people? Either one? It's out in the middle of nowhere, that's why I just, it just was interesting. Al-Jaff: I believe the only reason, and we've done this, this is not the first cell tower where we allowed the use of barbed wire on the top, and again it's because of security. Larson: Okay. That's all I have, thank you. Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2007 Keefe: Just a couple quick ones. The road off Creekwood, can we restrict them because the recommendation is for them to come, drive south to the site from the existing nursery, but they want to come up from Creekwood. Is that something, I don't see any restrictions or any conditions other than we'd like you to consider, but is that something we can? Al-Jaff: This property has frontage on Creekwood. This is a, according to the applicant, they intend to have one trip per month for maintenance purposes. The way the applicant explained it is, the owner of the property would like to keep the two entrances separate for security reasons. And that's the reason why we looked at this, at the two alternatives was mainly because of the length of this driveway. Keefe: Right. How do you maintain it and who goes on it and, right. AI-Jaff: But no, there is... Keefe: But if they choose to do that, if they choose to do that and maintain it and, is there much we can do about it really? Nothing. Okay. Alright, and then in regards to the conditions associated with them to remove the illegality, if you will, I didn't see anything in the conditions here. Is that something that's handled through. Al-Jaff: It should be. Keefe: Is it in there? Did I miss it? Okay. I'll take your word for it then. I didn't see it. Al-Jaff: It's in. Keefe: Which one is it? Al-Jaff: It should be under the conditional use permit. Keefe: I wrote something right above it, that's why I overlooked it. It's there. Al-Jaff: That's on page 14. Keefe: Yep. And then the last item I had was related to what Kurt was I think in part going after was, if this tower's built by T -Mobile and say somebody else locates on it, does that then restrict somebody else from building a tower within a certain distance from this? Another tower. So for instance if somebody else wanted to come in and have their own tower, I mean are towers, do we restrict the distance from tower to tower from different providers? Al-Jaff: What we want them, and it's not cheap to have a tower. Keefe: No, I know. Yeah. Al-Jaff: And so any user will first come and. Gi Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2007 Keefe: They'll likely want to co -locate on there but is there any restriction for somebody else say to come in and build another tower, if they could get Don Halla gets you know lease payment off of this and somebody else wants to build a tower and. Al -Jaffa They have to go through the exercise of demonstrating that this tower cannot accommodate one. They have to look within a mile radius. Exactly the same way we went with this applicant. Keefe: Okay. So the city rules essentially say that if there is an existing tower, you have to look to co -locate on that if it's within a mile area of service area? Al-Jaff: That's correct. And we have a letter from the owner of the property saying that he will allow the co -location. We have a letter, so it's a commitment letter that we get from different, from the owner of the property that says we will allow co -location on this tower. Keefe: Okay. FAA lights. Al-Jaff: We can't control. Keefe: Is there going to be one on this at 145 feet do we know? Al -Jaffa To the best of my knowledge there isn't going to be one. If FAA requires any signage or lights, then their regulations would supersede whatever we have here. Keefe: Yeah, it'd just be kind of nice to know if there's going to be a blinking light up there or not. Maybe the applicant can address that one. Okay. McDonald: I have no questions either so at this point if the, thank you staff for the report. If the applicant wishes to come up and address the commissioners and address some of these questions that are kind of waiting for you. Steve Edwards: Mr. Chairman, members of the commission. My name is Steve Edwards. I'm here tonight representing T -Mobile. I'd like to thank you for the chance to speak tonight and first of all I'd like to thank staff. Sharmeen has been very diligent in her questions and has responded to my questions in a very timely manner. Concerning the site, I know several carriers have been looking at this area for several years now and I think that's evident by Cingulars applicant with T -Mobile so far before the tower's even built to co -locate on the site which shows you that there's a need for a site in this area. I think the site we've come up with fits very well in the area. The actual bottom of the tower will be very well screened by the existing coverage that's in the area. And we're more than twice the distance away from any residences as required by the code. A couple of the issues that have been brought up by staff concerning the access. It's not T -Mobile's intention to build an 800 foot road right off the bat. I mean it is an inconvenience for T -Mobile also. But as it's been pointed out to me that Don Halla is not the only owner of this property. The actual nursery. There is another owner and that owner is not interested in creating an easement on the property, which don't work into his future plans. So that puts us in the position Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2007 of creating another access off the road. The shortest distance off that road obviously being 101 and I think we're familiar with that being in the process of being moved, and with that that puts us back to the 800 foot road and the actual access we're looking to complete off that is an extension of an existing driveway that we were able to basically provide so there won't actually be a new access off that road created. The issue, I have issue with 101. Ah, the 25 feet. Moving that back will not be a problem. That kind of works in with the situation with FAA. Currently we have a letter from the FAA saying that at our exact location with those coordinates we're okay to go without a light, but we'll have to re -file that now with the new position 25 feet away. Barbed wire. It's something we typically have on our sites. This is out in the middle of nowhere, as you said, and if the commission feels it's something they would not like to have on the tower, we can have that removed. Our cabinets within the fence are extremely durable and they have alarms on them if somebody goes after them with a baseball bat or something. It's going to take a few swings before it does harm. And then an alarm goes off within the site and one of our technicians is actually deployed to the site. Restriction about climbing the tower. There is, our climbing pegs start about 20 to 25 feet up so our technician actually has an extension of a ladder or even a cherry picker to access that tower so these aren't accessible by somebody who's not carrying a really long ladder which might be able to go onto the site. Another, as Cingular, if another carrier wants to approach T -Mobile with co -locating on this tower, we have what's known as a master lease agreement in place with all the major carriers which basically makes it a speedy installation for that carrier to utilize this tower. And if anybody were to apply to build another tower in this area, they would have to come to the City Council and Planning Commission and say, and prove the reason why they can't actually utilize this tower, so. I think that's really all I have. If I can answer any questions you might have. McDonald: Mark? Undestad: I was just curious on the question that Kevin had there on how many you can put on there. How many additional antennas work on that tower? Steve Edwards: Right now it's planned for 4 with the idea that Cingular's coming on below T - Mobile. T -Mobile's installing at the 145 level. Cingular will be able to install at 135. The next carver at 125 and 110. 115 with 10 foot increments. And in this area, 115 is still a pretty good coverage area for the fourth carrier coming onto that. If something does happen down the road and there is a fifth carrier or intemet provider or somebody else approaches T -Mobile to be on this tower, these towers are over engineered. And can be modified down the road if more strength needs to be put into the tower. But a fourth carrier tower is a pretty beefy tower as it is. Undestad: Is the inner net that they're talking about, does that go up into your antenna or is that something that again is going to get below the 115 mark or? Steve Edwards: That would actually come off of our platform. That would be part of our right with T -Mobile. Undestad: T -Mobile and the 145. Steve Edwards: Correct. 12 Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2007 McDonald: Questions? Dillon: How far like down into the ground does the tower have to go so it doesn't sway or how is that engineered? I mean is it just, because there's no guide wires. Steve Edwards: Exactly, it's engineered. We go out and we take a soil sample of the site. We send that off to an engineering firm who specializes in foundations. In this area I'd estimate 30 to 35 feet down. Prior to this I've worked in Louisiana. We were going 40 to 60 feet down so, there's a case now that goes pretty deep down there. Dillon: That's the only question I have. Papke: Just a question about how optimal the site is for T -Mobile and for the City of Chanhassen. It's quite common to build these along an interstate, because you get, you want to accommodate the people on the interstate. Why not a spot closer to 212 as opposed to right next to a golf course? Steve Edwards: I think I'll refer to our existing coverage. Papke: You know it's referred to several times as kind of the middle of nowhere. There's not that many residents right around the tower and because of the aesthetics involved, you just, you know one would intuitively think that a spot closer to the new 212 freeway would be better for the City and better for T -Mobile. Steve Edwards: Well as you can see we're actually going to be able to, sorry. This is an existing coverage as you see kind of the coverage that we currently have. This is what the site we're actually providing and that's one of the reasons we're going at 145 feet. It allows us to cover a large amount of area, still working within the city code. One of our biggest problems right now is along Pioneer Trail. 101 right there and then also kind of dipping down into the 212 down below. With that, this area's very, very restricted not only from the city code but also you have a bluff line in this direction. You drop off and pretty much go down about 100 feet down here until you get into wetland area, and then trailing off over into here we actually have some coverage along here that we're pretty satisfied with so, what we're really trying, this is really one of the only opportunities that we've actually had in this area to find a spot that is actually going to meet the coverage objective. So it's been a difficult and a long couple years working, trying to figure out what we're actually going to do on this so we're very happy with the location we found now so. McDonald: Okay, well thank you very much. At this point we will open this up for public comment and I would ask that you come up to the podium and just state your name and address and address your comments to the commissioners. So anyone wishing to comment on this, please come forward. Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2007 Tim Voehl: I happen to live at the southwest corner, the corner there. My wife and I, and we have 3 children, we're concerned about looking at the dangers that this might have to our family. If there's. McDonald: Excuse me sir, could you state your name and address. This is as much for the record as anything else. Tim Voehl: Sure. McDonald: Just living down in this little comer doesn't really help us. Tim Voehl: Alright. Tim Voehl. The address is 770 Creekwood Drive. McDonald: Thank you. Tim Voehl: So is there any kind of throw off to this? You know one concern that I heard mention of a lightning antenna on it. And I guess does it attract lightning strikes? I know that the storms get pretty severe down on the bluff. Is that going to draw lightning up into our area? Should I go on? I've got a little list here. McDonald: Okay, go ahead. Tim Voehl: Okay. Noise. I guess is there going to be a hum at all? I don't know if that's the case. Visual, what color is it going to be painted? Probably light blue. I assume since it blends in with the sky. What is the lease term? How long is it proposed to be there? I believe that Don Halla isn't the owner of that property indefinitely. You know in which case, when it changes hand, does the tower go with it? Well that's basically it. McDonald: Okay. I guess in answer to your questions, that's something that he should be able to approach you at City Hall with all the details of that. Al -Jaffa Sure. McDonald: Or is that. Al -Jaffa All the questions we're able to answer. Steve Edwards: I can also address those questions. McDonald: If you want to step up and address a couple of those questions for him. Steve Edwards: Yes, lightning. There is a lightning rod on this tower. The lightning rod's actually there to protect the electrical equipment at the base. It's not going to draw any additional lightning to the area, but what lightning is in the area, it will probably absorb. Noise. There won't be any noticeable noise. The closest house is 400 feet away. Our cabinets have small air conditioners in them. I don't think you'll, we have other sites, actually another site in 10 Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2007 Chanhassen on a city water tower which I was here last summer. We're within 90 feet of a gentleman's back yard and he has not called me to let me know that the noise was a problem so I think we're okay there. Color. I guess it is light blue huh? Light blue on a beautiful blue day is a very nice tower. It blends into the sky well. Here in Minnesota we have a lot of gray days, and the galvanized gray tower is what people are used to seeing, and this is personal opinion. It's not a problem whatsoever to have the factory do a blue tower. But blue towers stand out on a lot of days. Whereas a gray tower is the one that we commonly see, and we kind of know what the gray tower is or, we don't notice the gray tower as the blue one kind of jumps out at you. It is a 25 year lease agreement with Mr. Halla, and that would stay with the property if he sold the property in 10 to 15 years so. McDonald: Okay. Thank you very much. Does anyone else wish to come forward and make comment? Gloria Boynton: I wonder if we can see that map again of all the properties with that road up and to the left there. Now that's your yard right there Tim. See that square on the left hand corner that looks like it's part of Halla's property. Well Tim and Terry bought that house right there. That's their back yard. And so, and they've got 3 boys and they're concerned about kids climbing the tower. Getting too close to that equipment and you know this isn't way out in nowhere. Creekwood has about 20 residential houses right up to the golf course and down... It's not in the country. This is residential. I don't have any objection and I don't think that the tower looks that bad ... but I just think for the Voehl's, its quite close to their back yard there. Steve Edwards: I'm sorry... The drive in, I think you mentioned McDonald: And ma'am, just for the record. Could we get your name and address Gloria Boynton: Mine? McDonald: Yes ma'am. Gloria Boynton: Gloria Boynton. B -o -y -n -t -o -n. 777 Creekwood. McDonald: Okay, thank you very much. Does anyone else have any comments? Please come forward. Bruce Paul: Yeah my name is Bruce Paul and I live at 10240 Mandan Circle in the middle of nowhere. This neighborhood's been here since the 60's and I look at these photos. None of them show the shot from my picture window in my front yard. I don't want that thing next to me. It looks like a Christmas tree. You talk about landscaping and all that with the barbed wire fence. You couldn't see anything at 12 feet anyway. Can you find a tree 145 feet high? You know we have to look at this thing sticking up and you know what does it do to our TV interference? Our AM radio interference that we do have right now. Health hazards. I don't know. Microwaves. 1 mean I don't have a clue. You talked about some of these antennas being down 115 feet. What does this do to this 400 feet area then? And why here? Why not on 312 corridor? You know, and if Halla's going to get $3,000 to $4,000 rent a month on this thing, why doesn't the City of 11 Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2007 Chan buy a chunk of property on 312 and collect the revenue themselves? What does it do to my property value? You know the homes are somewhere around the $300,000 to $400,000 range there and like Gloria said, there is about 20 homes there so we're not in the middle of nowhere. We might in the southern tip of Chanhassen township but it's not the middle of nowhere. So that's some of the questions I had and concern about flashing light. It's a very quiet neighborhood and now I've got this beacon sitting up there. You might as well paint it green and have a Christmas tree. So that's some of my concerns. Thank you. McDonald: Thank you very much. Does anyone else wish to make comment? Seeing no one else come forward, I will close the public meeting and I will bring it back up for a discussion among the commissioners. Mark, any comments? Undestad: No. McDonald: Dan? Keefe: What's a typical city block, 500 feet? Typical if you're going like St. Louis Park, Edina you know. ...500 feet. Is it? 1,000 feet? So I mean it's at least a half a block away from any house. I still wouldn't want it in my yard either. Looking at it, but I mean were here to, I mean it complies with ordinances and that's really what we have to be concerned with so. McDonald: Okay. Debbie? Kathleen? Thomas: No. McDonald: Kevin? Dillon: I don't have any comments. It looks like, it's too bad that he can't use the access off the Halla Nursery. I mean I don't know if you could take another run at it to see if that would work but, you know from a safety and security and potential for mischief point of view, having another driveway coming in off of another road is you know, I think would be a concern. So if there's any, you know that would be the one, and that's sort of been tried and you know, a moot point at this time, that's what it is but I think that would be one thing that would you know seclude this just a little bit more. McDonald: Kurt. Papke: Well I think probably live the closest to this one. I think I'm about 3/4 of a mile so I feel kind of bittersweet about it. On one hand I appreciate the comments about the area. It's a very pastoral area. On the other hand, I only get one bar on my cell phone so I guess this one goes down into the category of progress, so. McDonald: Okay. I guess the only comment I would say is, yeah put it in the progress side of it. I mean people do want coverage for their cell phones and there's probably a lot of instances both from a safety and security standpoint. We depend upon cell phones very much now and we should be able to provide coverage to residents of the city and as long as they're meeting the 12 Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2007 requirements, I'd say the tower's going to be built. The only thing is, I hope everyone understands the restriction about Halla Nursery having to correct the illegal expansion into the Outlot A, that that could hold up progress of this, but that is a condition of what we will be voting on here. With that I'll accept a motion. It's your turn. Larson: My tum? Alright. Okay, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Site Plan Review #07-04 for a 149 foot telecommunication tower and a 7 foot chain link fence with 3 rows of barbed wire as shown on the site plan received January 19, 2007, subject to the following conditions 1 through 10. And did we have a friendly amendment with that somewhere? No? McDonald: Not with that one. Larson: Okay. And then, do we want to do these separate or together? McDonald: Well do them altogether. Larson: Okay. And second of all, the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit #07-04 for 149 foot telecommunication community and a 7 foot chain link fence with 3 rows of barbed wire as shown on the site plan received January 19, 2007, subject to the following conditions 1 through 7. McDonald: Do I have a second? Dillon: Second. Larson moved, Dillon seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approves Site Plan Review #07-04 for a 149 -foot telecommunication tower and a 7 - foot chain link fence with 3 rows of barbed wire as shown on the site plan received January 19, 2007, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement and submit financial security to guarantee the improvements. 2. Clearing for the tower and equipment pad shall be no greater than 15 feet from the edge of the pad. 3. A maximum of 25 feet is allowed for clearing the access road to the site. Trees shall be preserved to the greatest extent possible. 4. The applicant shall install a minimum of eight Black Hills spruce around the equipment platform. Trees shall be at least six feet in height. 5. Site grading and vegetation removal shall be minimized to the greatest extent practical. If any excess material is anticipated to be generated as a result of access road construction, the disposal location must be approved in writing by City staff prior to road construction. 13 Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2007 6. A rock construction entrance complying with the City's standard detail (#5301) shall be included on the Erosion and Grading Plan and shall be constructed prior to the remainder of the gravel road. 7. If applicable, the applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. (Watershed district and MPCA permits are necessary if the total disturbed area is in excess of 1.0 acres). 8. The monopole/tower shall be moved 25 feet to the west for a total setback of 175 feet and maintain a minimum of 150 -foot setback from the north, west and south property lines. 9. The driveway off of Creekwood Drive may not be used to serve nor access the Halla Nursery commercial operation. 10. Building Official Conditions: a. A building permit is required to construct the tower and equipment platform; the tower must be designed for a wind load of 90 MPH for 3 seconds (ref. 2000 IBC, Sec. 1609) and include the effect of one-half inch of radial ice (ref. MSBC 1303.1800). b. The plans (tower and platform) must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. Larson moved, Dillon seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approves Conditional Use Permit #07-04 for a 149 -foot telecommunication tower and a 7 -foot chain link with 3 rows of barbed wire as shown on the site plan received January 19, 2007, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall enter into a conditional use permit agreement and submit financial security to guarantee the improvements. 2. The tower shall comply with the requirements in ARTICLE XXX. TOWERS AND ANTENNAS of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The tower shall not be illuminated by artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state authority for a particular tower. 4. No signage, advertising or identification of any kind intended to be visible from the ground or other structures is permitted, except applicable warning and equipment information signage required by the manufacturer or by Federal, State, or local authorities. 14 Planning Commission Meeting - March 20, 2007 5. The applicant shall submit documentation at the time of building permit application showing the height above grade for all potential mounting positions for co -located antennas and the minimum separation distances between antennas. A description of the tower's capacity, including the number and type of antennas that can be accommodated should also be provided. 6. The monopole color shall be the brand ` Tnemac" and the color "Blue Elusion". 7. All outdoor storage associated with the Halla Nursery and located within Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the tower and the area shall be revegetated." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: GAUER ADDITION: REOUEST FOR A TWO -LOT SUBDIVISION WITH A VARIANCE FOR ACCESS OFF A PRIVATE STREET ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3820 LONE CEDAR LANE (LOT 4, BLOCK 1, CEDAR CREST), APPLICANT SCOTT & LAURIE GAUER, PLANNING CASE #07-07. Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. McDonald: Kurt, do you want to start us? Papke: Could you just make it clear where the private street actually is, since that's the key issue for which is in front of us tonight? It wasn't, it's a black and white drawing so just. Generous: It runs through, a portion of Outlot A and then into the right-of-way. Currently it provides access to the property immediately to the east of that, and so it would be within this right-of-way. Papke: So the private street already exists and is built. Generous: It exists. Papke: So the only thing that really gets added on here is a driveway off of the existing private street. Generous: Right. Papke: Okay. Generous: And as part of their original agreement they specified that they could do that, and then as a condition of approval we require that they provide the access easement and maintenance agreement. 15 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.2271180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Rnance Phone: 952227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.2271110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 0-1 April 1, 2014 Halla Family LP 6601 Mohawk Trail Edina, MN 55439 Re: Conditional Use Permit #07-04, Cell Tower Dear Halla Family Management: According to City records, there is a conditional use permit for a Cell Tower recorded against your property located at 720 Creekwood Drive. The City must conduct an inspection to ensure the site is in compliance with the conditions of approval, as specified in the enclosed Conditional Use Permit dated April 9, 2007. An inspection of the property will take place on Wednesday, April 16, 2014. If the site is found to be in compliance, future inspections will occur annually. However, if the site is in violation of the conditions of approval, staff will work with the property owner to bring the site into compliance in a timely manner. Annual compliance inspections will be scheduled from the time of compliance. If you have questions or concerns, please contact me prior to the inspection date above, at 952-227-1132 or dingvalson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, Milo.,,-, jtV"A+1. Drew Ingvalson Planning Intern Enc. 9:Vaa\cuP ml) wap\atmual inspection documents\t-mobile cell tower (hana family 1p)\07-04 t -mobile cell tower mapec:lion notice.doc Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #07-04 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for a 149 -foot telecommunication tower and a 6 -foot privacy fence. 2. Property. The permit is for the following described property ("subject property") in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota: Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition 3. Conditions. The permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant shall enter into a conditional use permit agreement and submit financial security to guarantee the improvements. b. The tower shall comply with the requirements in ARTICLE XXX. TOWERS AND ANTENNAS of the Zoning Ordinance. c. The tower shall not be illuminated by artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state authority for a particular tower. d. No signage, advertising or identification of any kind intended to be visible from the ground or other structures is permitted, except applicable warning and equipment information signage required by the manufacturer or by Federal, State, or local authorities. e. The applicant shall submit documentation at the time of building permit application showing the height above grade for all potential mounting positions for co -located antennas and the minimum separation distances between antennas. A description of the tower's capacity, including the number and type of antennas that can be accommodated should also be provided. .�v iv f. The monopole color shall be the brand "Tnemac" and the color "Blue Elusion". g. All outdoor storage associated with the Halla Nursery and located within Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the tower and the area shall be revegetated. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: April 9. 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN L-fi L-5 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2007, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 G:\PIANt2007 PbmdM Ca \07-04 T-Mobile\Conditional Use Permit Agr a ent.dm Notary Public Thomas J. Campbcl' Roger N. Knutson Thomas M. Scott Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poch I, Soren M. Mattick John F. Kelly Henry A. Schaeffer, III Alina Schwartz Samuel J. Edmunds Cynthia R Kirchoff Marguerite M. McCarron 1380 Corporate Center Cur Suite 317 • Eagan, MN 5512 651-452-5000 Fax 651-452-5550 www.ck-law.com CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association; Direct Did: (651) 234-6222 1lmaflAddress: snelson@ck-law.com November 4, 2008 Ms. Kim Meuwissen City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 C -I —. ; RECEIVED NOV 5 - 2008 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RE: CHANHASSEN— MISC. RECORDED DOCUMENTS ➢ Amended and Restated Site Plan Permit #2007-04 ➢ Amended and Restated CUP #07-04 (T -Mobile 149 -foot Telecommunications Tower and 6 -ft Privacy Fence on Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition) Dear Kim: Enclosed for the City's files please find original recorded Amended and Restated Site Plan Permit #2007-04 concerning construction of a 149 -foot telecommunications tower and a 6 -foot privacy fence on Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, which was recorded with Carver County on February 28, 2008 as Abstract Document No. A479189. Also enclosed is a photocopy of recorded Amended and Restated CUP #07-04 for the 149 -foot telecommunications tower on Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition which was sent to the County Recorder under the same transmittal letter as Amended and Restated Site Plan Permit #2007-04 and was recorded on February 28, 2008 as Abstract Document No. A479188; however, I never received the original recorded Amended and Restated CUP back from the County. Did it get sent back to the City by mistake? Please let me know if you have it! \l to SRN:ms Enclosures Regards, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Susfin R. Nelson, Legal istant SCANNED Document No. OFFICE OF THE A479188 COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Fee:$ 46.00 Cnec4:18544 Certified Recorded on 02-28-2008 at 11:30gAM ❑ PM 479196 11IM1111111 r r n Recorde CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #07-04 RESTATED AND AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. Permit Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for a 149 -foot telecommunication tower. 2. Property. The permit is for the following described property ("subject property") in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota: Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition 3. Conditions. The permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant shall enter into a conditional use permit agreement and submit financial security to guarantee the improvements. b. The tower shall comply with the requirements in ARTICLE XXX. TOWERS AND ANTENNAS of the Zoning Ordinance. c. The tower shall not be illuminated by artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state authority for a particular tower. d. No signage, advertising or identification of any kind intended to be visible from the ground or other structures is permitted, except applicable warning and equipment information signage required by the manufacturer or by Federal, State, or local authorities. e. The applicant shall submit documentation at the time of building permit application showing the height above grade for all potential mounting positions for co -located antennas and the minimum separation distances between antennas. A description of the tower's capacity, including the number and type of antennas that can be accommodated should also be provided. f. The monopole color shall be the brand "Tnemac" and the color "Blue Elusion". SCANNED g. All outdoor storage associated with the Halla Nursery and located within Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the tower and the area shall be revegetated. It. If substantial construction has not taken place within one year of the date on which the conditional use permit was granted, the permit shall become void" 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. S. LaRK- If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: November 26, 2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: -� Thoma�s%A. Furlong, MayoPr� By: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this L4 day of 2008, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhasken, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. ' " Notary Public'_ DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 fKIM T MEIIW SEN ilNotary Public-MinnesotaM. Commhalm F�cP1. Jan 31, 2010 g:tplaRN2007 planning ma%7.04 t-m)bile\10.5-07 applicatiWconditional uu permit age talo LandShark :: Display Document Page 1 of 2 Carver County :5,7141ra IT I d's hark !.c 610y J3 "} to c agag4fe Iris;�i - Document Name Legal Vol/Page Tax Liens Torrens Results Detail io Display Details for Document #A479188 Instrument Code: AMN Instrument Date: 1/14/2008 Verified: YES Date Recorded: 2/28/2008 Time Recorded: 11:30 AM Adjusted: NO Returned To: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Address 1: SUITE 317 EAGANDALE OFFICE Address 2: 1380 CORPORATE CENTER CURVE City/St/Zip: EAGAN, MN 55121 Grantor 1: CHANHASSEN CITY OF Grantor 2: Grantee 1: PUBLIC Grantee 2: Comments: Cartridge: Volume: Certificate of Title: 0 Transfer Fee: Mortgage: Reference: Document 1 of 1 Ref Inst: Page: Exempt Code: Ref Vol/Page: Fees: $46.00 Returned: MAIL (REGULAR) Access to, and use of, this web service is subject to the terms and conditions of the Disclaimer and all applicable laws and regulations. including laws and regulations governing copyrights and trademarks. http://landshark.co.carver.mn.us/LandShark/getdoc.j sp?DocNums n=A479188 I 11/4/2008 Document NO. OFFICE OF THE A 47 918 9 COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY. MINNESOTA Fee:$ 46.00 Check#: 18544 Certified Recorded on 02-28-2008 at 479185 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT # 2007-04 T -MOBILE USA SPECIAL PROVISIONS I RESTATED AND AMENDED SITE PLAN AGREEMENT AGREEMENT dated November 26, 2007, by and between the CITY OF 11:30 AMQPM Hanson, Jr. un Recorder CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and T -Mobile Central LLC (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for the construction of a 149 -foot telecommunication tower and a 6 -foot privacy fence (referred to in this Permit as the "project"). The land is legally described as Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enters into this Permit and furnishes the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contraet. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: SCANNED Plan A: Project Information & General Notes dated received October 5, 2007, prepared by T - Mobile. Plan B: Site Plan dated received October 5, 2007, prepared by T -Mobile. Plan C: Enlarged Site Plan dated received October 5, 2007, prepared by T -Mobile. Plan D: Landscape Plan dated received October 5, 2007, prepared by T -Mobile. Plan E: Erosion and Grading Plan dated received October 5, 2007, prepared by T -Mobile. Plan F: Antenna Information and Tower Elevation dated received October 5, 2007, prepared by T -Mobile. Plan G: Fencing Sections and Details dated received October 5, 2007, prepared by T -Mobile. Plan H: Power and Grounding Plan dated received October 5, 2007, prepared by T -Mobile. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by October 15, 2008. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $82,500 (site improvement). This amount has been calculated at a rate of 110% of the actual value of improvement. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: T -Mobile Central LLC Mr. Stephen Edwards 8000 West 78`" Street Suite 400 Edina, MN 55419 (612)702-5065 smedwards24@yahoo.com Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. On November 26, 2007, the City Council adopted the following motion: Site Plan Permit "The City Council approves the Amendment to Site Plan Permit #07-04 for a 149 -foot telecommunication tower and a 6 -foot cedar fence as shown on the site plan received October 5, 2007, subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement and submit financial security to guarantee the improvements. b. Clearing for the tower and equipment pad shall be no greater than 15 feet from the edge of the pad. c. A maximum of 25 feet is allowed for clearing the access road to the site. Trees shall be preserved to the greatest extent possible. d. The applicant shall install a minimum of eight Black Hills spruce around the equipment platform. Trees shall be at least six feet in height. e. Site grading and vegetation removal shall be minimized to the greatest extent practical. If any excess material is anticipated to be generated as a result of access road construction, the disposal location must be approved in writing by City staff prior to road construction. f. A rock construction entrance complying with the City's standard detail (#5301) shall be included on the Erosion and Grading Plan and shall be constructed prior to the remainder of the gravel road. g. If applicable, the applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. (Watershed district and MPCA permits are necessary if the total disturbed area is in excess of 1.0 acres). h. The current driveway grades near the pad are up to 20%; the area should be graded so that the maximum grade does not exceed 5%. i. The driveway off of Creekwood Drive may not be used to serve nor access the Halla Nursery commercial operation. j. Building Official Conditions: 1. A building permit is required to construct the platform and tower; the tower must be designed for an 100 MPH 3 -second gust wind load and include the effect of one-half inch of radial ice. 2. The plans must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. The contractor shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures." S. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. El CITY OF CHANHASSEN I" (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14 day of2008, by Tom Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corpor tion and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. T 1. NOTAR LIC KIM T. MEUWISSIN a' Notary Public -Minnesota MY Commission F�pVea Jen 31. 2010 DEVELOPER: • • 1 tra BY: Its 11iredocCyci,- ;L4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (SS COUNTY OF HNnU i ✓) ) T The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this � g'Wday ofe P m fbe 2007 by S LLC, a limited liability company under the laws of the State of Delaware, on behalf of the company. SUSAN MAE STREETS >< Notary Public Minnesota y cpmmissim Expires Januzry 31.2010 iTNL/O�TAR�Y/P /UB�LIC CONSENT Donald E. Halla and Sandra J. Cwayna Halla, husband and wife, owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this day of , 2008 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (sS COUNTY OF IUE % QIII '�, /I ti Donald Sandra J. Cwayna Halla The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this dpday of 2008 by Donald E. Halla, husband of Sandra J. Cwayna Halla i MARIA PEARKM ,y Notary Public - Mkwiiuch Commission Expim Jan. 31, 2010 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ate(ss) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisday of - P 2008 by Sandra J. Cwayna Halla, wife of Donald E. Halla. ------------ MARIA PEARSON Notary PtA* - minnewu Commission Expina Jan. 31, 2010 WWWWWWWWW" --- City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 _ 111 "n '- CTTY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT EXIIIBTT "B° GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, 3) the site plan has been recorded with the County Recorder's Office of the County where the project is located, and 4) the City Planner has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan E, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developers and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post maintenance bonds (Miller Davis Company Form No. 1636 or equal) or other security acceptable to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. 7. Responsibility for Costs. A The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses, which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attomeys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporaryjob site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmasters request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording. This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the site plan the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature 10 of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. GIPLAN\2007 Planning Cases\07-04 T-Mobile\l0-5-07 Application\Site Plan Agnxrnent.doc I1 '' City Council Meeting - April 9, 2007 Mayor Furlong: And then how much, or what level of use our local businesses are making of your resources. Janet Kinney: Not enough may I say, but we're going to work on that. We are building quite a good business library. We have a lot of things on CD's or tapes so you can use them in your cars, whatever format you might need. So a lot of the current business literature we're getting in that format and we've got a nice collection that's not being used as well as I wish it were so that's part of our marketing emphasis too. We do have a tremendous number of databases that are only available through the library's web site. We're beginning to notice some use there but truthfully we need to do a much better job of letting the business community know the resources that we have, and also finding out from the business community what we don't have or what they do want. So I am a very new member of the Rotary. Thank you Todd, and I'm a member of the Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce and we really hope that through those relationships we might increase our visibility in the business community. Mayor Furlong: Very good, thank you. Any other questions? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Yeah, Mr. Mayor I'd like to say thank you for everything. The librarian also announced that Mark Peterson is here tonight and he is on the Carver County Library Commission and he's one of the newest members so I'd like to welcome him here tonight and thank him for his willing to serve. And we also, my daughter, I was in the library about 3 hours ago for a book on Betsy Ross. Mayor Furlong: Report's due tomorrow? Janet Kinney: I hope it was in. Councilwoman Tjomhom: It was in. Thank you. Janet Kinney: Thank you very much. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Very good. Well move on now to next items of business on our agenda. T -MOBILE CELL TOWER, OUTLOT A. HALLA MARYANNE ADDITION: APPLICANT, T -MOBILE: CONSIDER SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 145 FOOT CELL TOWER WITH A 4 FOOT LIGHTNING ROD AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A FENCE OVER 61/2 FEET. Kate Aanenson: Thank you. As you indicated Mayor, this application is a conditional use for a cell tower. I just want to clarify at the Planning Commission there was some ambiguity about the process itself and the location at this site. The subject site that is before you tonight is just north of Creekside, or south of Pioneer Trail on 101, just south of the Halla Nursery site. It is a conditional use which means that we would attach conditions to mitigate the impact but we wouldn't deny it. We did look at other opportunities for a cell tower in this area, but based on 5 City Council Meeting - April 9, 2007 their needs and the opportunity that we would have with our property, there wasn't another option at the time. So the pole itself is 145 feet, which does meet ordinance. There was a lightning rod that does need to be applied and there was a request for a conditional use to go higher with the fence and that was to accommodate barbed wire, but the staff at this time is recommending that the barbed wire be removed, and IT talk about that in a minute. This item did appear before the Planning Commission on March 200 and there were several questions that were raised by the residents. I just want to go through those just to make sure that we, the residents feel comfortable that we did address them. One was the climbability of the cell tower and there's extension ladders so the highest point to be putting it onto a ladder is 20 to 25 feet. Again the blinking light, it doesn't appear that needs to be put in place right now by FAA standards. Again the barbed wire is a conditional use. It is permitted in that district that it is but we're recommending no, and the reason for it is this property can be subdivided in the future. It would become legal non -conforming and we didn't want to have to deal with that at a future date. T -Mobile has done other sites in the city. The last one you saw was at the Murray Hill, the water tower there. If you remember we put a taller fence there. There was no barbed wire and again a residential area so we just want to make sure that we don't have a legal or a non -conforming situation in the future when this property could be subdivided. So going to the 6 feet would take away the requirement for the variance. So the fence would just be 6 feet with no barbed wire, and that would be modified in a condition which remind me to make sure I go back to. Again I talked a little bit about the service area, and I've got a map to show that in a minute when I go through those, and then how many antennas. This does provide for additional antennas and I'll go through that too. So the tower itself is 145 feet. The units will be placed at the bottom. I've got a better site plan on that so there is an application or the ability to provide additional receivers on the site itself without going taller. Again once the tower's been approved administratively, those would just come in place. We did provide at the Planning Commission, we asked the applicant to show the perspective of the surrounding properties, so this would be Bluff Creek Golf Course looking across. The color itself is also blue, which you saw in the original one, and that's what you're seeing here. Which is called out in the staff report. This is looking from the golf course drive going, this would be looking north. Halla Nursery entrance. And these are the units on the base. Again they won't be in a building but there will be a fence around it. So this is what you would see, and this is the fence around again without the barbed wire, the tower itself and then the units. So this originally when this appeared before the Planning Commission we did ask the applicant to table because we were in the middle of finishing up the 101 corridor study. The ordinance does say that you have to be so far from a right-of-way. Because we had picked a preferred alignment, the applicant worked with us and actually while this site plan doesn't reflect it, it is in the conditional approval to move the site back. Mayor Furlong: Which way is back? Kate Aanenson: Sorry, this way. Here's 101. I'm sorry, I had it upside down. So it would be moved this way. The other request, the staff had originally that it would come through a shorter distance to the Halla Nursery site. There's issues regarding ownership of the underlying property. Mr. Halla's in control over it, coming off of Creekwood, so the driveway would come in this way. Again, the current cell tower would be moved in about 25 feet to the west. Okay, so the issue then is the expansion of the, well why don't we just show this one too. There was a r,J,,:.. 3 A City Council Meeting - April 9, 2007 request regarding, I'm sorry. Where the location of the homes are. So this has got the distance of all the homes. This is the closest home which is 430 feet from the tower, and that's the historic home in the city right here. That would be the closest house to the property. Otherwise they're in excess of 600 feet. Again as required in our ordinance, we did look at the service area. They met all the standards for that as far as location. The ability to service that, the site itself. I've got a more detailed sheet on that but I think that's pretty self explanatory. The issue then that we wanted to address was the expansion. One of the conditions was that we had a stipulation agreement regarding use of the retail nursery site, so this is the original conditions. If you look now as it's expanded into this area here and if you look in more detail, it's being used as a storage area. This is the approximate area of the cell tower. So because that's expanded outside the stipulation agreement of the non -conforming use, we've made a condition of approval of the cell tower that before a permit's issued, that this, the nursery business, the equipment that's being stored, and now some of those cars are not operational. That those cars be removed and that he comply with the original conditions. So we have two uses on that site. One being the non- conforming. So with that we are recommending approvals and I do have a couple modifications starting on page 12. And the condition regarding the site plan would just be for a 6 foot chain link fence, and you can strike the barbed wire. That would be just in the motion. And then the last condition, well let's see. Well I guess that's it. The last condition is the one that relates to the nursery itself, the cleaning up of the site. There's a question that was asked. Condition it was. So with that, I'd be happy to answer any questions that you have. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Questions for staff. Councilwoman Tjomhom: I just have one. On condition 9. No, no. Yeah. The driveway off Creekwood Drive may not be used to service nor access the Halla Nursery. How is that going to be enforced or why is that an issue? Kate Aanenson: Well, the neighbors were concerned about that because of the amount of truck traffic that's associated with the nursery. Has been an issue. Again the current nursery has a main entrance off of 101, so now you're coming off of a more residential street, and they wanted to make sure since they're so close, that that doesn't become a secondary outlet. The sight lines are, it's 30 miles an hour right through there. It's slower speeds so sight lines a little poorer so we just wanted to make sure that that doesn't become a secondary access for the nursery is all. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Can we and how do we enforce that? Kate Aanenson: Well it's not built to you know be a dirt road. I guess we'd have to just manage it and cite them for that. You have a conditional use. It's not always the best way to go back and revoke it if they're in violation of the terms of the conditional use also. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay. Councilman Peterson: Do you know any other towers we have that tall around town, just to give me a perspective? 7 City Council Meeting - April 9, 2007 Kate Aanenson: The tallest one we have is the one that's off of Lyman Boulevard. That was probably 200 feet. That's the one that's on the corner of Stone Creek Drive. That would be the tallest one. I do have a list of. Councilman Peterson: I'm thinking of the one at Brown's. Kate Aanenson: That one, I don't think that one's that tall. There's one on Park Road that's behind an industrial building. South. Well, on the same side of the street as the city's public works. That's up against the railroad tracks. That's 150. Don't have heights on all of these. Councilman Peterson: That's fine. I just. Kate Aanenson: Actually a lot of them are on our water tower. The only, the most recent free standing ones would be, there's one up on Quattro Drive that we put in an industrial park. Then the other one would be on the Park Road. Otherwise most of them we've been lucky to get on water towers because we don't have public utilities. That obviously would have been our first choice, and I think that residents were hoping that too. South of Lyman but we don't have utilities in that area yet. Councilman Peterson: Okay, thanks. Mayor Furlong: Other questions. Councilman Litsey: Just a couple. One is, has there been any feedback from residents on the proposal here? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, they were concerned about just the fact that, why did this site get picked? Again we did look at our city park. The grades didn't work as well there and with the 101 shifting, probably would have been equally as visible so. Councilman Litsey: I mean no one's pursued anything further than inquiries? Kate Aanenson: Well I wouldn't say that they're happy that it's going up. I don't think anybody's happy when a cell tower goes up in their neighborhood. So I think, because it is a conditional use, again what we try to do is mitigate the impacts regarding, there will be a fence and trees planted around the structure itself. We tried to pick the color, and that's called out in the conditions of approval to blend that into the sky as much as possible, and that was the other reason to get the perspectives on the distance from the homes there too. Those are larger lots in that area but it's still a visual impact. Councilman Litsey: The other thing, you talk about re -positioning the tower and that it probably won't need to get, need FAA approval. I mean there won't be a requirement by the FAA to have a light on the top of the tower? Kate Aanenson: Correct City Council Meeting - April 9, 2007 Councilman Litsey: But we don't know that for certain or? Kate Aanenson: Well we did with the current location because they're moving it 25 feet to the east, I'm pretty confident that you're underneath the FAA requirements so more than likely it wouldn't be, and that was just another beacon that was a concern. Councilman Litsey: I just want to make sure that, I realize it's a very short distance but I don't want to see that happen and then you know have that light blinking at night irritating people. But I guess at this point there's no way to get assurance on that, or is that part of the approval? Kate Aanenson: Well I don't know if you'd want to see it again for that reason. Again we can't control it. That's a FAA requirement. It would still meet the height standards because under the 150, even with that, it still is, it's just that kind of nuisance factor. Councilman Litsey: Okay, thanks. Councilwoman Ernst: Kate, this is, is this like a collaboration between T -Mobile and Cingular? I mean it sounds, I see mention of Cingular throughout here and it sounds like. Kate Aanenson: Yes. Councilwoman Ernst: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Typically when you build one, you try to get other users on there to pay for the cost so, and we have that similar on our water towers. We have multiple users on those too. Councilwoman Ernst: So bottom line, this is going to increase our. Kate Aanenson: Reception. Councilwoman Ernst: Our reception throughout the area. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, I have a map showing the service area. This is going to be hard to read too based on the scale, but this is one of the things that we do ask them to show. This is, at this scale it's hard to read but we're in this service area right here. So it increases the service area to here, over here. Yeah, so it significantly increases the service area. If you look at the topography there, it's also a challenge too as you go towards Hesse Farms and it's changing. So it does provide a significant service area in town towards the river. So as we provide sewer and water expansion, we'll have other opportunities with our infrastructure to meet some of the other needs that hopefully we can put them on our utilities and not duplicate other sites. Other free standing sites. We try to combine those uses so they're not such a nuisance. Mayor Furlong: Ms. Aanenson, conditional use permit versus interim use permit. Is this allowed as an interim use permit? City Council Meeting - April 9, 2007 Kate Aanenson: No, it's allowed as a conditional use which runs with the property forever, which is one of the reasons why I wanted to make sure that we take the barbed wire off now because we do put homes in there, then we've got a situation that we couldn't revoke that so. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And then with regard to the materials of the fence versus a chain link and again thinking ahead. Would a privacy fence... Kate Aanenson: You know the last one we did, if you recall on Murray Hill where we actually ended up doing a pretty tall wood fence? So there are other applications. As we looked at some of the ones that we have on our, next to our water towers, we actually have them in penthouses in this location. Not all of them. The one up on 41. There's two actual structures with roofs. The one that we just approved on Murray Hill is just fenced around the perimeter, so what we try to do is show some consistency, where they're located. Nobody can see that part of it. But I would agree, there's other applications for fences and security and further subdivision. Mayor Furlong: Well I know, if I'm recalling the same one you are on Murray Hill, there was a desire of a local resident to have the fence exceed the 6 feet high standard. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: And we have the opportunity here because there aren't necessarily residents with that view to go with the 6 foot high, but to use materials such as a privacy fence versus the chain link in anticipation so I guess, was that given some thought or were there any concerns about that? Kate Aanenson: You know honest, that part of it, I think we could have taken a couple different approaches on that. So certainly wood is an option. It has another maintenance issue, but wood certainly would be an option. Then you have to worry about the landscaping because that's a maintenance issue too. That someone's taking care of that landscaping. Mayor Furlong: Yeah, and I don't know that it necessarily would void the landscaping option but again from a material standpoint versus... Kate Aanenson: Right, it's a conditional use so you can attach whatever you want for screening, so wood is certainly an option and we've used it predominantly. Again to be clear, if you look at where we have it up on Quattro, because it's behind an industrial building, those tend to be chain links but when you're in a residential areas, I would agree. You know typically we've gone. Mayor Furlong: And we don't know how this area will develop but it could. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Right now it's guided large lot. Again with the comprehensive plan update, we're looking at, you know it was given large lot because the underlying owner at that time had a 1 per 10 density that he wanted to transfer forward. Now things have changed. That density's gone away. That we may want to look at just going with a more traditional residential zoning on that as we update the comp plan so, there could be more housing units there. 10 City Council Meeting - April 9, 2007 Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Any other questions for staff at this time? Is the applicant here? Anything you'd like to address the council on sir? Steve Edwards: No. Staff has already... Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Councilwoman Ernst: I have another question Mayor Mayor Furlong: Yes. Councilwoman Ernst: So is the recommendation that we approve just that as a chain link fence as part of this or not? Mayor Furlong: What I heard staff saying is, the variance. Somebody will correct me if I'm wrong, usually Mr. Knutson. The ordinance allows for a 6 foot high fence without a variance, is that correct? Roger Knutson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: And what the variance was for was to exceed our variance up to 7. Now what staff was saying is, stay at 6 so basically there's no variance associated with the fence to stay at 6 with no barbed wire. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: And the only issue I raised was materials of the fence. Councilwoman Ernst: So we're going with the 6 foot versus the 7? Mayor Furlong: That's what staffs recommending. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, not to complicate it but I guess, the units themselves are probably closer to 8 feet in height, so if you know, since you noticed it with a variance and if you wanted to switch to other material, you could still go 7 foot wood and you would cover, you would screen more. I think we were just recommending that, we don't think it's appropriate when it could be developed. Put that barbed wire in long term. What I'm saying, since we noticed it with a variance, if you wanted to go to 7 to add more security, and visual block, you certainly could that too since it was noticed for 7 feet. Councilwoman Ernst: But we're striking barbed wire and we're. Kate Aanenson: Right. That would be my recommendation. Mayor Furlong: And you're also recommending no variance required in terms of height. I1 City Council Meeting - April 9, 2007 Kate Aanenson: Unless you wanted to. Mayor Furlong: Unless we wanted to. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Okay, any other questions? Okay, any questions for the applicant at this point? If not, thoughts, comments. Any thoughts? I guess my, to follow up on Councilwoman Ernst's line of questioning. I don't see any reason to go above 6 feet. I don't think that's necessary. Keep that within our ordinance. The chain link versus another privacy material, I guess my preference would be to go with some sort of privacy fence of material, if there's a maintenance issue that comes up and have staff work with them in terms of approving that. Just in anticipation. I don't think it's our, we need to necessarily block the potential view of anybody ever from seeing these. At least it's going to be there when homes are ever built but putting that privacy fence up now, and continue with the landscaping plan over time, the landscaping will also soften and cover and screen as well but, that will give us screening currently. Depending on what they do. So that was my only thought there. But from a, looking at the findings of fact and with staffs recommendation on the fence, avoiding the 7 foot high and certainly aborting the barbed wire, I think that makes sense. The other conditions seemed reasonable. Any other thoughts? Councilman Peterson: Motion to approve. Councilwoman Ernst: Second. Mayor Furlong: Approve what? Councilman Peterson: Deleting the barbed wire and maintaining our ordinance on the fence with some kind of inferring the view so, privacy fence. Mayor Furlong: Is that on the site plan that we need to have that condition then Ms. Aanenson? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: Or is that the conditional use permit? Kate Aanenson: It's under, it's actually under both. Mayor Furlong: Okay, where do you want it? Councilman Peterson: Both. Mayor Furlong: Keep it in both? Kate Aanenson: Yeah. 12 City Council Meeting - April 9, 2007 Mayor Furlong: Okay. So rather than chain link, insert the words privacy? Under both. So 6 foot high privacy fence and strike the words barbed wire on both the site plan and the conditional use permit? Councilman Peterson: Affirmative. Mayor Furlong: Okay, that was the motion made. Councilman Peterson: Adopting the findings of fact as submitted. And as changed. Mayor Furlong: Okay, very good. And there was a second on that as well? Okay. Motion made and seconded. Does everybody understand the motion made? Any discussion on that? Councilman Peterson moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded that the City Council approves Site Plan Review #07-04 for a 149 -foot telecommunication tower and a 6 -foot privacy fence as shown on the site plan received January 19, 2007, subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement and submit financial security to guarantee the improvements. 2. Clearing for the tower and equipment pad shall be no greater than 15 feet from the edge of the pad. 3. A maximum of 25 feet is allowed for clearing the access road to the site. Trees shall be preserved to the greatest extent possible. 4. The applicant shall install a minimum of eight Black Hills spruce around the equipment platform. Trees shall be at least six feet in height. 5. Site grading and vegetation removal shall be minimized to the greatest extent practical. If any excess material is anticipated to be generated as a result of access road construction, the disposal location must be approved in writing by City staff prior to road construction. 6. A rock construction entrance complying with the City's standard detail (#5301) shall be included on the Erosion and Grading Plan and shall be constructed prior to the remainder of the gravel road. If applicable, the applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. (Watershed district and MPCA permits are necessary if the total disturbed area is in excess of 1.0 acres). 8. The monopole/tower shall be moved 25 feet to the west for a total setback of 175 feet and maintain a minimum of 150 -foot setback from the north, west and south property lines. 13 City Council Meeting - April 9, 2007 9. The driveway off of Creekwood Drive may not be used to serve nor access the Halla Nursery commercial operation. 10. Building Official Conditions: a. A building permit is required to construct the tower and equipment platform; the tower must be designed for a wind load of 90 MPH for 3 seconds (ref. 2000 IBC, Sec. 1609) and include the effect of one-half inch of radial ice (ref. MSBC 1303.1800). b. The plans (tower and platform) must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilman Peterson moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded that the City Council approves Conditional Use Permit #07-04 for a 149 -foot telecommunication tower and a 6 - foot privacy fence as shown on the site plan received January 19, 2007, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall enter into a conditional use permit agreement and submit financial security to guarantee the improvements. 2. The tower shall comply with the requirements in ARTICLE XXX. TOWERS AND ANTENNAS of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The tower shall not be illuminated by artificial means and shall not display strobe lights unless such lighting is specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration or other federal or state authority for a particular tower. 4. No signage, advertising or identification of any kind intended to be visible from the ground or other structures is permitted, except applicable warning and equipment information signage required by the manufacturer or by Federal, State, or local authorities. 5. The applicant shall submit documentation at the time of building permit application showing the height above grade for all potential mounting positions for co -located antennas and the minimum separation distances between antennas. A description of the tower's capacity, including the number and type of antennas that can be accommodated should also be provided. 6. The monopole color shall be the brand "Tnemac" and the color "Blue Elusion". All outdoor storage associated with the Halla Nursery and located within Oudot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the tower and the area shall be revegetated." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 14 City Council Meeting - April 9, 2007 Todd Gerhardt: And the minutes will reflect that was for both issues. The site plan and the conditional use. Mayor Furlong: Site plan, yes. Yes, that was both motions as amended in the staff report. Mayor Furlong: The City Council has authorized four standing commissions whereby residents are appointed to assist the council on various matters throughout the year. The commissions include the Planning Commission, Park and Recreation Commission, Senior Commission, and Environmental Commission. Appointments to the 7 member commissions are for 3 year terms beginning with April of each year and are staggered such that 2 or 3 positions expire each year. Appointments for mid-term vacancies, if any, can occur at any time and such appointments are for the unexpired portion of that vacancy's term. Over the last 3 weeks the City Council has interviewed a number of candidates for open positions on all the commissions. At our last meeting we appointed 3 members to the Planning Commission. This evening we will consider the Senior, Park and Rec and Environmental Commissions. The City Council is grateful to all who applied and we recognize that each applicant is willing to offer a substantial commitment of their time and energy for the benefit of all of us, and we appreciate that. Unfortunately there are a high number of high quality, qualified candidates that exceeded the number of available positions and as such we were not able to appoint some applicants of whom we are confident would have served well. After full consideration of each applicant's background, skills, desires, the current and anticipated issues facing the various commissions and the City Council, it's the City Council's intention to make the following appointments. To the Senior Commission. Curt Robinson and Charlie Robbins for terms expiring in March of 2010. Carol Buesgens for a term expiring March of 2008. Park and Recreation Commission. Tom Kelly and Thor Smith, terms expiring in March, 2010 and Daniel Campion for a term expiring in March of '09. Environmental Commission. Dennis Hansen and Rose Kircher, both for terms expiring in March of 2010. At this time I would hereby move these nominations and ask for a second from the council. Councilwoman Tjomhom: So moved. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Motion's been made and seconded. Is there any discussion on these appointments? I took that as a second. Councilman Peterson: We're just not used to having you move. Mayor Furlong: I know. It's rare. Any discussion on these appointments or comments on the process. Mayor Furlong moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council make the following appointments: 15 s"Q. x Proposed T'-Mobi!c Antenna AIP0902 Halla Nursery From the Nursery Entrance r�� The west looking east IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR A. M. DATE �'�� TIME P.M. fkv OF PHONE AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION CI FAX ❑ MOBILE AREA CODE NUMBER TIME TO CALL TELEPHONCD PLEASE CALL CAME TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU - RUSH RETURNED YOUR CALL SPECIAL AT-, ENMON MESSAGE SIGNED fVu . FORM 3002C CPfYOF Date: October 9, 2007 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Subject: Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review Amendments to allow a 145 -foot Telecommunication Tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod and a 6 -foot privacy fence, located west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course. The site is legally described as Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition. Applicant: T -Mobile USA. Planning Case: 07-04 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on October 5, 2007. The 60 -day review period ends December 4, 2007. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on November 6, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than October 26, 2007. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation (3 copies) 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or SprintfUnited) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco Location Map T -Mobile Cell Tower Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Amendments Planning Case No. 07-04 City of Chanhassen __rd n...,a roneriru lmw ,., SUBJECT PROPERTY .e w�x.rw US 212 F1r^9C J5 • 0 0 111 111111 1 NEW VrLm ]GYICE ONE - UNI CNCRAN �' lix. a s n ' -•-�+ •mn yr . o:x . �Nxw.Nw..NNrx N �IdOYx FY�IYMlIWMIV �1w.L ~� W N s mwl msmm s. aa+wu. mmxvv v w -oM -ai �6m�m'.a �nm law vvwx. �rw� w N.w mrls ,m �mn .v w ix5". .o o II w`® I . I •.me I SWUNG SYSIIAY " � r s u nrna i °w` — \ \ ,y f II�/\— a i uwiw s1°'xn ®' :mac n®'w me MM mss ��w I N yl, O.Y Imrt. iee0 l� N`M dT t �v PMYFN AxOpOWFx Ax0 R��l�� u., wy w�r rw.rr. NALLA NURSERY rinl � �" w Q��• Fu.ir o+liwi AlR T Mobile :�::�� `._ MNERAMOROUNGNSRLAN -: - . M M.. looco ceur n.wa Ew. ISI -"3��• �v �IDllalij— gVNM.4Q1, NIMMOOfA —Arvuoxfl iJIp YINNEAPOLI9 tdAREET 111 111111 1 C)-7 -0� CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION I®' Application of T -Mobile for a Conditional Use Permit #2007-04 and Site Plan approval for a 145 -foot Telecommunication Tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod. On March 20, 2007, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of T -Mobile for a conditional use permit and site plan approval for the property legally described as Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, located west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed conditional use and site plan that was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned A-2, Agricultural Estate District. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential Large Lot (2.5 Acre Minimum 1/10 acre outside of MUSA). 3. The legal description of the property is: Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition. 4. Section 20-232: a. Will not be detrimental to or enhance the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. b. Will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. SCANMeo g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. h. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. j. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. Will not depreciate surrounding property values. 1. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article. 5. Section 20-110: (a) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (b) Consistency with this division; (c) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; (d) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (e) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 2 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (f) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 6. The planning report #2007-04 dated March 20, 2007, prepared by Sharmin Al-Jaff, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the conditional use permit. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 20"' day of March, 2007. CHANHASSEN PLANNING CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 07-04 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, March 20, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a 145 -foot cell tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod, and to allow a fence over 6'/2 feet in height on property located west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course (Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition). Applicant: T -Mobile. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/sere/vlan/07-04.htnd or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner Email: saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1134 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on March 8, 2007) SCANNED o1-61 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 07-04 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 20, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a 145 -foot cell tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod, and toallowafenceover6'a feetinheight on property located west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, south of Halla Nursery, and eastofBluffCreek GolfCourse(Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition). Applicant: T -Mobile. Apbm showingthelocationofthe proposal is available for public review on the , C ty' web site a WWW.f"ix ntla sen mn.US sely pla t -� m oratcfty Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner Email: saliafftaci.chanbassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227- 1134 (?ublishedintheChanhassen Villager on Thursday, February 8, 2007: No. 4817) Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No.IL-L was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijklmnopgrs z Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and swom before me on this 1 -day of 2007 Notary Public RATE INFORMATION GWEN M. RADUENZ NOWY PJ&E-AIUB`WA My Csmmietim F1¢ies Jn 31, 2010 Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $40.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $40.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $11.89 per column inch SCA'^—n T e °Mobile. J:5:o21 het moyref�Om life September 12, 2006 Sharmeen AI-Jaff City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 RE: Co -location Opportunities Dear Sharmeen AI-Jaff, As a site acquisition agent for T -Mobile, I have been instructed to pursue collocation opportunities on existing towers whenever possible. In the case of monopole near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, I was unable to find a collocation opportunity. I did investigate the possibility of using the existing siren pole at Bandimere Community Park, which was once used as a Qwest facility. T -Mobile look at it at the existing height and with an extension of the pole by 25' which could be permitted by the City Council per the code, but the due to the lack of height and distance for the primary objectives it was determine not to be a viable candidate. Should you have any additional questions or if I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ,--,Ste henard. P Site Acquisition Specialist T -Mobile USA 612-702-5065 St. Stephens Pioneer Park I Chaska 110'11, og °.i ,�qlis Cu r to /� 12 One Mile Radius - Collocation Locations 14 AWO p�yleer 7raii "t! ZD CO R y teke m Chanhassen Siren W 96th StIA Proposed Site Chanhassen 4 mC; > COP m zap Lc a� yOsse Farm f� P\a LaKc Shakopee Choi 14 Riley Lake Ry Riley Lake Park t e m c K Omand T�aA Eden Prairie Copydght m 1888-4004 Microsoft Corp. and/or Its suppliers. All rights resenrad. help /Petr y. mivosoft.com/streets/ 0 Copyhght 2003 by Geographic Data Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 0 2004 NA VTEQ. All rights reserved. This data Includes Information taken with permission from Canadian authorities 0 Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada. 0 c 0 a 2 '?o m 0 17 Iron,No Pioneer —77�.,_ Park Chaska B� �!. y 0,� Bluff Creek Park m g Tai Lc�Fa� Rayesse Farm Ro c Kota Ln 1 a La p ,�?jls Cup ztz Flying Cloud Of 14 pyoneer I-- JGQI VI I f\II ly n 1 r- JU.-- W 96th P tot 12 Shakopee 0 mi Ry�ey Lake Pb, Riley Lake Park U) d rT m o ( Il of of p rland T Eden Prairie Copyright m 1988-2004 Microsoft Corp. and/or Its suppliers. All rights reserved. httplMww. microson. coMatreete/ 0 Copyright 2003 by Geographic Data Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. 0 2004 NAVrEQ. All rights reserved. This data Includes Information taken arm permbslon from Canadian authorities 0 Her Majesty the Queen In Right of Canada. Print Data/Map Page I of 1 http://156.99.124.167/website/parcel_search/printdatamap.asp?PID=253060020 6/5/2006 iFOO I 101 1505, 4asW,,I north looking south M kaj&4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 01/30/2007 2:54 PM Receipt No. 0033773 CLERK: katie PAYEE: T -MOBILE T -Mobile Cell Tower Planning Case 07-04 ------------------------------------------------------- Use & Variance 925.00 Sign Rent 200.00 Recording Fees 50.00 Total Cash Check 1250 Check 1172 Check 1170 1,175.00 0.00 500.00 250.00 425.00 Change 0.00 o� SCANNED • • • mMoblle &et moy-e f y-Om life` January 29, 2007 Sharmeen Al-Jaff City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd 7700 Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Application Fee Dear Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Enclosed please find a check for $500.00. Should you have any additional questions or if I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stephen Edwards Site Acquisition Specialist T -Mobile USA 612-702-5065 T -MOBILE CELL TOWER - PLANNING CASE 07-04 $500 Site Plan Review $425 Conditional Use Permit $50 Recording Escrow $200 Notification Sign $1,175 $500 T -Mobile Check 1250 $250 T -Mobile Check 1172 $425 T -Mobile Check 1170 SCANNED Property Information PID#: 253060020 Parcellnforenation Property Address: Taxpayer Information: NOT ON FILE DONALD E HALLA & SANDRA 7 CWAYNA HALLA 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA , MN 55318 Parcel Properties GIS Acres: 12.06 Homestead: N School District: 0112 Parcel Location Section: 25 Lot: Township: 116 Block: Range: 023 Platname: HALLA MARYANNE ADDITION Location Map T -Mobile Cell Tower Planning Case No. 07-04 City of Chanhassen _ - �..*npry ul Pgrear Tran Hr 14) 2 m F Qe �e G 0 .4 SUBJECT 'PROPERTY mxD ti j J52\2 F1 U5212 F Clgl'J Drive 13S 212 f fCC¢ Ldh¢ SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 07-04 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 20, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Site Plan Review and a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a 145 -foot cell tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod, and to allow a fence over 6�/2 feet in height on property located west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course (Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition). Applicant: T -Mobile. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/sere/plan/07-04.html or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen A]-Jaff, Senior Planner Email: saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1134 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on February 8, 2007) T • •Mobile (set more fy-OVK life January 12, 2007 Sharmeen AI-Jaff City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd 7700 Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Conditional Use Permit Application for a Telecommunications Facility to be Located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, Minnesota Dear Sharmeen AI-Jaff, I am submitting this letter on behalf of T -Mobile USA, which is applying for a Conditional Use Permit for its planned construction, operation, and maintenance of a communications tower facility to be located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 55318. This letter provides a general overview of the project, including its need and its design. I. Contact Information Applicant T -Mobile USA 8000 West 781" Street Suite 400 Edina, MN 55439 Agent for Applicant Steve Edwards 501 5& Street West Minneapolis, MN 55419 Property Owner Donald Halla 10,000 Great Plains Blvd Chaska, MN 55318 "t for Property Owner ,Same as Applicant H. Location and Description of the Property The subject of the Conditional Use Permit application (the "Subject Property") is located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, Minnesota The plat name is Halla Maryanna Addition. The Subject Property is zoned Agricultural Estate District. The property is located west of Great Plains Blvd and north of Creekwood Drive. III. Proposed Use T -Mobile USA proposes erecting a 1`45"monopole to enhance T -Mobile's digital network nationwide and particularly, in the area of southern Chanhassen. Specifically, T - Mobile seeks to improve coverage along Pioneer Trail (Hwy 14), Flying Cloud Drive (Hwy 212) and Great Plains Blvd (Hwy 101) for current and future T -Mobile subscribers. In addition, T -Mobile USA intends to solicit other telecommunications carriers to locate their equipment on the proposed monopole. This will reduce the need for other towers in the area, while providing other carriers sufficient height on the proposed monopole to enhance their networks. Cingular Wireless has submitted a collocation application and requested to be added to T -Mobile's zoning drawings. I believe they are prepared to install on the tower once approved and an agreement has been worked out for their ground equipment. IV. Proposed Tower The overall height of the proposed monopole will be 145' feet with a 4 -foot lightning rod. A monopole is a single shaft tower with no guyed wires, pursuant to zoning regulations; the monopole will be able to accommodate four (4jcarriers. T -Mobile will have equipment at the base of the monopole (the "Facility"). The equipment will be enclosed by a six-foot chain link fence, with three (3) strands of barbed wire around the top for protection. There will be no advertising on the tower. Once the tower is constructed, vehicles will visit the site for maintenance purposes approximately once a month. The proposed Facility will be unmanned, and it will operate continuously. No sewer or water service is required for operation of the tower. V. Why and How This Location was Chosen A. Process for Developing a Site If T -Mobile believes that there may be a need to increase coverage in a particular area, its Radio Frequency (RF) Engineers first generate propagation studies using certain predication tools to determine whether there is a need for a cellular site in a specific area anq how effectively a proposed cell site would provide coverage to a certain area. If, based on the propagation study, T -Mobile's RF engineers determine that there is a need for a new site, the RF engineers next identifies a Search Ring. A Search Ring is a geographic area in which potential sites may be located to effectuate the maximum amount of coverage in a service -poor area RF Engineers identify a Search Ring based on several criteria, including coverage and capacity needs, topography, and locations of other T -Mobile sites. After a Search Ring is identified, T -Mobile employs a site acquisition specialist to locate possible sites within the Search Ring. Typically, a site acquisition specialist first looks for potential collocation sites within the Search Rings, in order to minimize the cost of new construction and to meet the spirit and intent of local regulations that encourage collocation in order to minimize the number of towers in a jurisdiction. If no suitable collocation sites can be identified within the Search Ring, the site acquisition specialist next looks at options for building a new tower which would meet the local regulations and provide the best location for future collocators, while also providing T -Mobile with the coverage and capacity needed in the area. B. Technical Reason for Developing a Site To address coverage needs, RF engineers separate the entire network into geographic cells or coverage areas. The size of each cell varies depends on demographics, terrain, and antenna limitations. At the center of each existing cell is a Base Transceiver Station (BTS). The BTS consists of the antennas, transmitters, receivers, power amplifiers, and signal processing hardware. Basically, the BTS is a network component that provides the connection between a user's mobile handset and either another mobile user's handset or the traditional wired network system in our homes and businesses. Wireless phones generally need to "see" a cell site for proper transmission and reception. Thus, all of these technologies are governed by line -of -sight limitations. The distance between geographic cell sites differs greatly depending on the demographics. For instance, in highly populated areas, cell sites may need to be as close together as Ile of a mile; whereas in rural areas, the sites may be as much as 5 miles apart because a given site can handle a finite number of calls during peak hours. Thus, the more dense the surrounding population, the smaller the service area will be for a single site. Other factors to be considered in system design are the terrain, elevation, ground clutter, and foliage. C. Reason for Selecting the Subject Property near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd After generating a propagation study, T -Mobile's RF engineers identified a coverage and capacity need in the Great Plains Blvd area in November of 2005. The RF engineers then identified a Search Ring that would improve the coverage, assuming a suitable location could be identified. T -Mobile next asked a site acquisition agent to search the area for existing towers that could be utilized for collocation. When none were found, T -Mobile determined that a new tower would have to be built to provide coverage and capacity to the area. The location near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd was selected as the best location to meet the regulations of the City of Chanhassen and provide the best location for future collocators, while also providing T -Mobile with the coverage and capacity need in the area. D. Consumer and Wireless Technology Today, there are more then 205 million wireless subscribers in the United States compared to just 24 million in 1994. Customers are taking advantage of cutting-edge wireless content and service that help people stay connected to family and friends. Many people are dropping their wire line phones altogether and using their wireless devices exclusively. Wireless phones and data devices allow consumers to do so much more then ever before. In addition to being vital personal and public safety tools, many wireless devices can new be used to send and receive e-mail and text messages, make purchase and even track a user's location during an emergency. While T -Mobile and other wireless companies spend billions of dollars each year to improve wireless network quality and provide the best possible service, there is more work to be done and challenging obstacles to overcome. Coverage area must be improved and network capacity expanded to handle the growing number of calls and wireless data usage. T - Mobile and other companies are working to improve services where consumers are increasingly using their phone and data devices — at home and in their neighborhoods. E. Conclusion Since T -Mobile began developing its network in Minnesota in 1996, cell phones have become a necessity, and in recent years have began employ a growing number of applications, such as text messaging PDAs, email, photos, and video clips. With this new growth, the need for new telecommunication sites has grown as well. If approved, the proposed tower to be located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd will provide the Great Plains Blvd area with the quality of service T -Mobile's customers have come expect. Should you have any additional questions or if I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, l jtcphen Fd s Site Acquisition Specialist T -Mobile USA 612-702-5065 T 0 VlMobile�m (set more from life January 12, 2007 Sharmeen Al-Jaff City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd 7700 Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Conditional Use Permit Application for a Telecommunications Facility to be Located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, Minnesota Dear Sharmeen AI -JA I am submitting this letter on behalf of T -Mobile USA, which is applying for a Conditional Use Permit for its planned construction, operation, and maintenance of a communications tower facility to be located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, MN 55318. This letter provides a general overview of the project, including its need and its design. I. Contact Information Applicant T -Mobile USA 8000 West 7801 Street Suite 400 Edina, MN 55439 Agent for Applicant Steve Edwards 5015001 Street West Minneapolis, MN 55419 Property Owner Donald Halla 10,QQ0 Great Plains Blvd Cheska, MN 55318 Agent for Property Owner Same as Applicant II. Location and Description of the Property The subject of the Conditional Use Permit application (the "Subject Property") is located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd, Chaska, Minnesota. The plat name is Halla Maryaana Addition. The Subject Property is zoned Agricultural Estate District. The property is located west of Great Plains Blvd and north of Creekwood Drive. III. Proposed Use T -Mobile USA proposes erecting a T45r-monopole to enhance T -Mobile's digital network nationwide and particularly, in the area of southern Chanhassen. Specifically, T - Mobile seeks to improve coverage along Pioneer Trail (Hwy 14), Flying Cloud Drive (Hwy 212) and Great Plains Blvd (Hwy 101) for current and future T -Mobile subscribers. In addition, T -Mobile USA intends to solicit other telecommunications carriers to locate their equipment on the proposed monopole. This will reduce the need for other towers in the area, while providing other carriers sufficient height on the proposed monopole to enhance their networks. Cingular Wireless has submitted a collocation application and requested to be added to T -Mobile's zoning drawings. I believe they are prepared to install on the tower once approved and an agreement has been worked out for their ground equipment. IV. Proposed Tower The overall height of the proposed monopole will be 145' feet with a 4 -foot lightning rod. A monopole is a single shaft tower with no guyed wires, pursuant to zoning regulations; the monopole will be able to accommodate four (4j carriers. T -Mobile will have equipment at the base of the monopole (the "Facility"). The equipment will be enclosed by a six-foot chain link fence, with three (3) strands of barbed wire around the top for protection. There will be no advertising on the tower. Once the tower is constructed, vehicles will visit the site for maintenance purposes approximately once a month. The proposed Facility will be unmanned, and it will operate continuously. No sewer or water service is required for operation of the tower. V. Why and How This Location was Chosen A. Process for Developing a Site If T -Mobile believes that there may be a need to increase coverage in a particular area, its Radio Frequency (RF) Engineers first generate propagation studies using certain predication tools to determine whether there is a need for a cellular site in a specific area anq how effectively a proposed cell site would provide coverage to a certain area. If, based on the propagation study, T -Mobile's RF engineers determine that there is a need for a new site, the RF engineers next identifies a Search Ring. A Search Ring is a geographic area in which potential sites may be located to effectuate the maximum amount of coverage in a service -poor area. RF Engineers identify a Search Ring based on several criteria, including coverage and capacity needs, topography, and locations of other T -Mobile sites. After a Search Ring is identified, T -Mobile employs a site acquisition specialist to locate possible sites within the Search Ring. Typically, a site acquisition specialist first looks for potential collocation sites within the Search Rings, in order to minimize the cost of new construction and to meet the spirit and intent of local regulations that encourage collocation in order to minimize the number of towers in a jurisdiction. If no suitable collocation sites can be identified within the Search Ring, the site acquisition specialist next looks at options for building a new tower which would meet the local regulations and provide the best location for future collocators, while also providing T -Mobile with the coverage and capacity needed in the area. B. Technical Reason for Developing a Site To address coverage needs, RF engineers separate the entire network into geographic cells or coverage areas. The size of each cell varies depends on demographics, terrain, and antenna limitations. At the center of each existing cell is a Base Transceiver Station (BTS). The BTS consists of the antennas, transmitters, receivers, power amplifiers, and signal processing hardware. Basically, the BTS is a network component that provides the connection between a user's mobile handset and either another mobile user's handset or the traditional wired network system in our homes and businesses. Wireless phones generally need to "see" a cell site for proper transmission and reception. Thus, all of these technologies are governed by line -of -sight limitations. The distance between geographic cell sites differs greatly depending on the demographics. For instance, in highly populated areas, cell sites may need to be as close together as Ile of a mile; whereas in rural areas, the sites may be as much as 5 miles apart because a given site can handle a finite number of calls during peak hours. Thus, the more dense the surrounding population, the smaller the service area will be for a single site. Other factors to be considered in system design are the terrain, elevation, ground clutter, and foliage. C. Reason for Selecting the Subject Property near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd After generating a propagation study, T -Mobile's RF engineers identified a coverage and capacity need in the Great Plains Blvd area in November of 2005. The RF engineers then identified a Search Ring that would improve the coverage, assuming a suitable location could be identified. T -Mobile next asked a site acquisition agent to search the area for existing towers that could be utilized for collocation. When none were found, T -Mobile determined that a new tower would have to be built to provide coverage and capacity to the area. The location near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd was selected as the best location to meet the regulations of the City of Chanhassen and provide the best location for future collocators, while also providing T -Mobile with the coverage and capacity need in the area. D. Consumer and Wireless Technology Today, there are more then 205 million wireless subscribers in the United States compared to just 24 million in 1994. Customers are taking advantage of cutting-edge wireless content and service that help people stay connected to family and friends. Many people are dropping their wire line phones altogether and using their wireless devices exclusively. Wireless phones and data devices allow consumers to do so much more then ever before. In addition to being vital personal and public safety tools, many wireless devices can new be used to send and receive e-mail and text messages, make purchase and even track a user's location during an emergency. While T -Mobile and other wireless companies spend billions of dollars each year to improve wireless network quality and provide the best possible service, there is more work to be done and challenging obstacles to overcome. Coverage area must be improved and network capacity expanded to handle the growing number of calls and wireless data usage. T - Mobile and other companies are working to improve services where consumers are increasingly using their phone and data devices — at home and in their neighborhoods. E. Conclusion Since T -Mobile began developing its network in Minnesota in 1996, cell phones have become a necessity, and in recent years have began employ a growing number of applications, such as text messaging PDAs, email, photos, and video clips. With this new growth, the need for new telecommunication sites has grown as well. If approved, the proposed tower to be located near 10,000 Great Plains Blvd will provide the Great Plains Blvd area with the quality of service T -Mobile's customers have come expect. Should you have any additional questions or if I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, jtep d s Site Acquisition Specialist T -Mobile USA 612-702-5065 Date: January26, 2007 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Subject: Request for Site Plan Review for the construction of a 145 -foot cell tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod, and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a fence over 6'h feet on property located west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course. The site is legally described as Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition. Applicant: T -Mobile. Planning Case: 07-04 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on January 19, 2007. The 60 -day review period ends March 20, 2007. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on February 20, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than February 9, 2007. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attomey c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint/United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco SCANNED Location Map T -Mobile Cell Tower Planning Case No. 07-04 City of Chanhassen --~~- SUBJECT PROPERTY. US 212 flirelake Date: January 26, 2007 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner Subject: Request for Site Plan Review for the construction of a 145 -foot cell tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod, and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a fence over 6%: feet on property located west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course. The site is legally described as Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition. Applicant: T -Mobile. Planning Case: 07-04 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on January 19, 2007. The 60 -day review period ends March 20, 2007. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on February 20, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than February 9, 2007. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official E Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint/United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco Location Map T -Mobile Cell Tower Planning Case No. 07-04 City of Chanhassen r,a ~~~-I SUBJECT PROPERTI CM OF Date: January 26, 2007 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Subject: Request for Site Plan Review for the construction of a 145 -foot cell tower with a 4 -foot lightning rod, and a Conditional Use Permit to allow a fence over 6'/2 feet on property located west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Creekwood Drive, south of Halla Nursery, and east of Bluff Creek Golf Course. The site is legally described as Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition. Applicant: T -Mobile. Planning Case: 07-04 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on January 19, 2007. The 60 -day review period ends March 20, 2007. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed firture utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on February 20, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than February9, 2007. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint/United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacorn 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco Location Map T -Mobile Cell Tower Planning Case No. 07-04 City of Chanhassen s -- _ —nr Mrul Pioneer T.1 (H 14) Qo I Oe 0 8 0 SUBJECT PROPERTY ra J, OnJ —� Ja us 212 Glad Drive 3S 2,12 R.. Lek. MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner FROM: Jerrin Mohn, Building Official DATE: January 29, 2007 SUBJ: Site Plan Review for: Communication Tower to be located on Outlot "A", Halla Maryanne Addition (approx. 10000 Great Plains Blvd.). Planning Case: 07-04 I have reviewed the request for the above project and have the following conditions: 1. A building permit is required to construct the tower and equipment platform; the tower must be designed for a wind load of 90 MPH for 3 seconds (ref. 2000 IBC, Sec. 1609) and include the effect of one-half inch of radial ice (ref. MSBC 1303.1800). 2. The plans (tower and platform) must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota 3. The contractor shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. G/plm /2007 Planning Cases/07-04 T-Mobile/buildingofcialcommems.doc T -MOBILE CELL TOWER - PLANNING CASE 07-04 $500 Site Plan Review $425 Conditional Use Permit $50 Recording Escrow $200 Notification Sign $1,175 $500 T -Mobile Check 1250 $250 T -Mobile Check 1172 $425 T -Mobile Check 1170 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 710F (952) 227-1100 To: Steve Edwards T -Mobile USA 8000 West 78th Street, Suite 400 Edina, MN 55419 Invoice SALESPERSON DATE TERMS KTM 3/8/07 upon receipt (QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION I UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 22 Property Owners List within 500' of Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition $3.00 $66.00 (22 labels) TOTAL DUE $66.00 NOTE: This invoice is in accordance with the Development Review Application submitted to the City by the Addressee shown above (copy attached) and must be paid prior to the public hearing scheduled for March 20, 2007. Make all checks payable to: City of Chanhassen Please write the following code on your check: Planning Case #07-04. If you have any questions concerning this invoice, call: (952)-227-1107. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 10/05/2007 2:18 PM Receipt No. 0053777 CLERK: katie PAYEE: T -MOBILE PLANNING CASE 04-07-C�)1-bL� ------------------------------------------------------- GIS List 66.00 Total 66.00 Cash 0.00 Check 1270 66.00 Change RM SCANNED City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 5531 (952) 227-1100 10��-0U(f Invoice To: Steve Edwards b1^�Ip e — T -Mobile USA 8000 West 78th Street, Suite 400 /� Edina, MN 55419 �� SALESPERSON DATE TERMS KTM 3/8/07 upon receipt 22 Property Owners List within 500' of Outlet A, Halla Maryanne Addition (22 labels) TOTAL DUE AM $66.00 NOTE: This invoice is in accordance with the Development Review Application submitted to the City by the Addressee shown above (copy attached) and must be paid prior to the public hearing scheduled for March 20, 2007. Make all checks payable to: City of Chanhassen Please write the following code on your check: Planning Case #04-07. If you have any questions concerning this invoice, call: (952)-227-1107. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! Meuwissen, Kim From: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 2:19 PM To: Stephen Edwards Cc: Meuwissen, Kim Subject: FW: Iii Steve, I am following up on our last conversation regarding the site plan agreement. You said that you wanted your legal department to look at it. You also said that T -Mobile changed their name. I need this information as soon as possible. As I explained on the phone and in the letter of approval, I need this document to be signed and notarized and escrow for the cost of improvements be submitted to the city. Also, as stated in the conditions of approval, "All outdoor storage associated with the Halla Nursery and located within Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition, shall be removed prior to issuance of a building permit for the tower and the area shall be revegetated. " Once the clean up is complete, please schedule an inspection. Mncerely Sharmeen AI -Taff Senior Planner 952-227-1134 From: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 10:20 AM To: 'Stephen Edwards' Subject: Hi Steve, Please find attached the Site Plan and Conditional Use Agreements. Let me know if all legal names are correct. Sincerely Sharmeen AI-Jaff Senior Planner 952-227-1134 Get your FREE personalized email signature at My Mail Signature! 6/8/2007 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT # 2007-04 T -MOBILE USA SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated April 9, 2007, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and T -Mobile USA (the "Developer'). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for the construction of a 149 -foot telecommunication tower and a 6 -foot privacy fence (referred to in this Permit as the "project'). The land is legally described as Outlot A, Halla Maryanne Addition. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enters into this Permit and furnishes the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A: Project Information & General Notes dated received January 19, 2007, prepared by T - Mobile. Plan B: Site Plan dated received January 19, 2007, prepared by T -Mobile. Plan C: Enlarged Site Plan dated received January 19, 2007, prepared by T -Mobile. Plan D: Landscape Plan dated received January 19, 2007, prepared by T -Mobile. Plan E: Erosion and Grading Plan dated received January 19, 2007, prepared by T -Mobile. Plan F: Antenna Information and Tower Elevation dated received January 19, 2007, prepared by T -Mobile. Plan G: Power and Grounding Plan dated received January 19, 2007, prepared by T -Mobile. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by October 15, 2008. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $82,500 (site improvement). This amount has been calculated at a rate of 110% of the actual value of improvement. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: T -Mobile USA Mr. Stephen Edwards 8000 West 78's Street Suite 400 Edina, MN 55419 (612) 702-5065 smedwards24@yahoo.com Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. On April 9, 2007, the City Council adopted the following motion: Site Plan Permit "The City Council approves Site Plan Permit #07-04 for a 149 -foot telecommunication tower and a 6 -foot privacy fence as shown on the site plan received January 19, 2007, subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement and submit financial security to guarantee the improvements. b. Clearing for the tower and equipment pad shall be no greater than 15 feet from the edge of the pad. c. A maximum of 25 feet is allowed for clearing the access road to the site. Trees shall be preserved to the greatest extent possible. d. The applicant shall install a minimum of eight Black Hills spruce around the equipment platform. Trees shall be at least six feet in height. e. Site grading and vegetation removal shall be minimized to the greatest extent practical. If any excess material is anticipated to be generated as a result of access road construction, the disposal location must be approved in writing by City staff prior to road construction. 2 L A rock construction entrance complying with the City's standard detail (#5301) shall be included on the Erosion and Grading Plan and shall be constructed prior to the remainder of the gravel road. g. If applicable, the applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval. (Watershed district and MPCA permits are necessary if the total disturbed area is in excess of 1.0 acres). h. The monopolettower shall be moved 25 feet to the west for a total setback of 175 feet and maintain a minimum of 150 -foot setback from the north, west and south property lines. i. The driveway off of Creekwood Drive may not be used to serve nor access the Halla Nursery commercial operation. j. Building Official Conditions: 1. A building permit is required to construct the tower and equipment platform; the tower must be designed for a wind load of 90 MPH for 3 seconds (ref. 2000 IBC, Sec. 1609) and include the effect of one-half inch of radial ice (ref. MSBC 1303.1800). 2. The plans (tower and platform) must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota." 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. 3 CITY OF CHANHASSEN M (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) Tom Furlong, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_day of 2007, by Tom Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. DEVELOPER: R" Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF ) NOTARY PUBLIC The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2007 by 4 NOTARY PUBLIC CONSENT Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this _ day of 2007 I -W Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2007 by City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 5 NOTARY PUBLIC CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT EXM1T "B" GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, 3) the site plan has been recorded with the County Recorder's Office of the County where the project is located, and 4) the City Planner has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan E, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post maintenance bonds (Miller Davis Company Form No. 1636 or equal) or other security acceptable to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses, which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and constriction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmasters request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording. This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 am. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws. Ordinances. and Regulations. ations. In the development of the site plan the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. g9p1an\2007 planning caseet07-04 t-mobile\site plan agreement.doc T . oftflee 8550 West Bryn Mawr, Chicago, IL 60631 Carver County GIS Mapping Application Vr4 Ca.mtg, N 14 k FIN 6434 Murray Hill Road = T -Mobile is seeking a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a -foo7tall � privacy/security fence on property zoned Sipgle-Family Residential Di (RSF). Staff is recommending approval of this request. iwJ.) rarK icuau Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review to allow a 150 foot Telecommunication Tower and an 8 Foot Chain Link Fence ")X/ !� "` Outlot A, Arboretum Business Park 2"d Addition, 2953 Water Tower Place conditional use—permit to install a commumc tinnantenna on the city water tower 1T x 1T an a pment building 2 �' -" U / 7700 Quattro Dr., NW corner of 77"' Street West and Quattro Drive, Lot 1, Block 1, Quattro Addition conditional use permit to install a communication tower and site plan approval for a 75' monopole and equipment platform, Sprint PCS 78 West 78th Street Conditional use permit request to permit a 76 foot cellular communication tower and 288 square foot equip m n § 20-1504 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE applicant can demonstrate that, by a combination of antenna design, positioning of the structure and/or by screening erected or already in place on the property, off-site views of the antenna are minimized to acceptable levels. (Ord. No. 259, § 1, 11-12-96) Sec. 20-1505. Setbacks. Towers shall conform with each of the following minimum setback requirements: (1) Tower shall meet the setbacks of the underlying zoning district with the exception of industrial and business zoned districts, where the tower may encroach into the rear setback area, provided that the rear property line abuts another industrial or business zoned district and the tower does not encroach upon any easements. (2) Towers shall maintain a minimum setback of ten feet from all property lines. (3) For sites that are adjacent to parcels developed, guided, or zoned for residential use, setbacks shall be ecual to the height of the tower. (4) Towers shall be set back from all planned public rights-of-way by a minimum distance equal to one-half of the height of the tower, including all antennas and attachments. Z (5) Towers shall not be located between a principal structure and a public street. (6) A tower's setback may be reduced, or its location in relation to a public street vaned, at the sole discretion of—Me e city council, to allow the integration of a tower into an existing or proposed structure, such as a church steeple, light pole, power line support device, or similar structure. (7) No tower, antenna, or accessory structure shall be located in a wetland or within the wetland setback. (8) In a residential district, the required setback from a property line for antennas and towers not rigidly attached to a building or structure shall be equal to the height of the antenna and tower. Those antennas and towers rigidly attached to a building or structure, and whose base is on the ground, may reduce the required setback by the amount equal to the distance from the point of attachment to the ground. (Ord. No. 259, § 1, 11-12-96; Ord. No. 377, § 153, 5-24-04) Sec. 20-1506. Towers in residentially zoned districts. Towers to be located in residentially zoned areas are subject to the following restrictions: (1) Towers supporting amateur radio antennas shall conform to all applicable provisions of section 20-915 of the City Code. (2) Towers supporting commercial antennas and conforming to all applicable provisions of this Code shall be allowed in residential zoned districts in the following locations: a. Church sites, when camouflaged as an architectural feature such as steeples or bell towers; CD20:238 B T x s a s a VICINITY MAP PROJECT DATA INIFRDX IFASE SPACE EMEAMN IrwsE SPICE: 15 Fr x 35 Fr a P.VICn AK! e • 101 B ZONING ® ■ ■ ■ ■ T pQ d Plom'TPIA , , I my MsaePrDN 5 Ras axrsE 6 aENaI YMN 061 FED T-YCRE SITE AI" M BEAR ,aooD GREATwxsAT PeLw. CPINHI6IX uN pAF K n GENERAL NOTES SCOPE OF SUPPLY PROJECT TEAM`"'' uTT1DDE Ar-b'-tT1' tnNcnuDE M3-3x'-ue• x R G a 1. T£ COMIRIDIOR SINLL SIMRASE AW DIMLt Nl WCRK, 1SDD IR BEST SKGL AMO ArTEMm1 1E SWLL BE S02Y RE406BIE FOB ML COISRUCtDN EIFMS. YEIIDps, TFCINIXIq PMCEOR6 MID SEaIRJCES Edi COORMNfiD Au PMflD15 a THE W1RIf uHDFT TIE wrJIRI2T. 2 1XE COxIPM10R Fl ll NSR TE JOB SIZE ro IEYEW 1M SCOPE M F010( Ila D61NG Jae STE COIMIo1S 11 LMTRICIOR SINLL NOTIFY TIE ENCxxDI F DEFARs NE COFRDFAEO LMSMM, UNSV[ MOt WAiFAPROM, DB NOt \1ilN CISIDYVEY 1PADE PRILRE F MEC I M TREED, RRL BE ASSUMED TNT i1RE 6 HO OBIECIDN m THE HTML WTARs ME nTR1Dm ro slow THE Dm NsuLr M O,1HE� YNOR WDFIGIRNS WY M MEm1JOFD AS PN11 • THE FCl1DR1^ TABLE DE] 01, IR THE 16POIRRRITES M aFFTAfNt PMi6 M0.VED c COYPIE'INC T16 PROR.T. •THE 511E SPFLFC SCOPE M WORK tall PPFLEDE Nlf D6fAEPN1CaES idJHD 011116 SCOPE M 9FRY. 1.1MIEE 41®RVffi T-YCBIE C/0 wICESI lth WN]ESS CORP. 12 l& sE 3&N sm¢r �In'E" WA xe00e AAcrtvNe'c P Tm s RFP[M! ,KNllm xw X RAW LAND SITE CO -LOCATION SITE 11FM NRNRHM R mwT R IIW FURN90 R MSIALLID R T-YOBNE GTIEIR/ATaR PEATDNI TEY ITS x xJWIOxD. BUt IDt LYIEO ro 1ECIUJRCHI. FIELTN(Yl SEANCE, MD OwMl COOBMNlbH1 1 THE mNPADmR IIOR VFAIFY ALL EITSTINC CMDRIDNI AID DNDJSDNS PRIOR m SUBYIt11NG MR TC NO 06CJEPANCIES, C01BlICR 1 OYl6DH1 ETC. SWJL M NPmaFD ro TIE tNGxEIIE BEFORE PROCEEDED WITH 10. EXSm10 FIEVATDIS NA lDG1fOM5 m M JOKED stall BE VENTED R THE CONIPMTm1 BEFME COtSIRUCIDG F dFTER f1DY THOSE 5110611 ON THE PWB• THE CONTRICTmI SWLL MORY THE ENGINEER SUCH TINT IIICC aIpR GN BE Y BEiDRE PRSEELNG •ROM THE x �OtYBH Flrrt OON IViIA XCR FIEALY m' I1o1E1FK TPIL mp w SSIY PI 1115 PIAT0101 T-YOBIE CWINCIm1 BR PLpfORY iO1RYGIMM fDIEI0.•LIDA COFIIPIGIOR m TOWEA ! m PLAI{ORY MNBDIDM COMRIDIOR CmE1WCim1 mC (POIEF/1600) T-IDs•E OONIRN:IM $ITE DIRECTIONS UD (NREA/16(L) T-IDBEE CONTRIL'mF m CAaET Ti-IDAE VlFedtDIOM DAREr T-YOBRE BPIflpIaIIDN BR GBIE15 T-YOBIE NRFEExEATION 1!E WORK. 1. TIE CONIRILimt SHML PROTDCt ILL AREAS F110Y DNYDE WDLII WY OCCUR WANG COHSTBDTDN. AM 0.•el•DE ro NEN .IND Ex611NG LOIS1RUCiDN, STFDTIRE, M EWPYEHJI. DMl BE NIEMAIRY RFP m M otiI ro THE SAIRTACIDN M 1M TENANT 011 BMDMG oF1E11 M OWNFA'S RFNEIDRAIM1[ AT THE OPOSE M 111E NMMACIOB 17. ML mBOlS AID ABBREVNTIDIS USED p1 TIE DRAFNGS ABE Ca19MTATED CO imaNtts FANOAR6. F THE COMPICTOR Hl5 WEStMMS REGWONC TIFM WCt YENNING THE FHGNHDI stall BE HOTBED EOR CWIFICAl10E15 BEFTME mRccEEOw M11H wORA 11 THE W"rtUCIpR SHNL PRpOf ML 1ECES BIDt]aw ER S REQUIRING THE e•..e WPPoBI iM Nl EBQ zEN iNLFB m•°I�P mlmR T-YOBRE - WNNFIPdb OA'EST BODO WM >eM 91lEET SIE � WN',. UN. 5w%I p Y3 F i[ IRS BIS GBINER T-MOBFE xIPIJ]ENfATIOX IMFIRN T-IRIBIE CONIRICipE WE BIBELBOMS: TROY F1W ! 1-39/. GO FEST ax I -N4 iqt s IlE m MFY 21% 00 W m1 HOY a1B FM 3 LLB m OR 1: m NMt AHD GO FEST FOR s 10.E m MY lOt (CREAT flNE BEw.}, TxN IFF( bRD XF! tot AND w soum BOR 1 s ME ro CREFNR000 q - TUN! R ND Go IpBN OF CREDfWOW Ods£ : R IPPROYWIFLY ]W iFFI ANIFSxN T-YOBEE WNBVLIOR fMx V8E T -YORE CONMILIM COV( CABIE T-YOBRF COMIP/Cigl J111FFA C.1B16 T-Y00•F WMMILigI JUpEA G1HS T-Y00♦E MxIpM.Rpq M (Eq HIORE NgiFR) T-YOBEF CONIRILIM 11N WM MARE NPIFRR) T -YORE ccm IDR QOIpDNp MIR fM CDV! T-YOBEE WMIRIGipI mDII1pM• 1014 iM LOVI T-YDBBE CONIRICimt FIE GRmJN1N0 WTW15 COMPACTOR COMIPKTpt F.WIERNlS - S INE COMRILIME SMVL BE NSMKE9E FOR ANO SWIL REPTILE M (ARI/. AR illitt, of -ROPER, OR NFIIOW OR WxRYANSHP M NO D•ll•GE WNCN 5>EAL APPiIA WTRN TH YEAR AfiFA THE cOIPIEiDM ND ACCEPfANM M THE FORK (MMA 1NLS CMJIRKI. 0. THE CONPICIm1 SWJL REMQR: NL N1BBm1 ANa WASR WlFAWS ON A PEmA/N NSR. AID SW1L FIOJDRE SINCt C0F11Ral WOE JC8 CIFANNG IIwMMRKR lx. CITY APPMA4D PINS S BE I® N A PVN BOX AND SWJL HJQf BE (SED BT WaRKYIX Ill COSTRlD110X SER SIMLL AFFI£CT SAYE 0 CONDITION, TE DOITTR.•LTGR Stall N9l 4VMNN IN COOD CONDITION, OAN cH,,NIIE SET K PWS MT1N ALL REVLSICAS. ADDEHIDA AND CIYWE OIDIXS W THE PTHE AT ML nYQ THESE TAE m BE UNDEit 11E CNE M THE JOB E1)PERIHfEXCFNt. � T -MOBILE - YWHFl1 . 11003 � TM STREET EDM( 1x1 551.rY e 511E CNOIRDBD WIFm•IS LOMPACiMI COMPICld1 AMENN IIOBMINIG PIPE ! BRKJRF T -YORE LOMTYLSM C41 b IIGIPS BfimE CD41C GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AIrtEMN 1DIJDNc PINE ! BTWA) T- COR�RI`laR WvvAJ¢ °TAG` ((TER m TER) T-YOBBE rDxTRIDTDR wYECwE BRDM (EOPI ro TER) T-WRE COMIPIGIOR wAVELLOE LMOEII (mAFR) T-IDBBE WMNILIA LAOOEIE (TORET) T-YOB1E COIIIPILIOR FENCE WNMICigI CMBRICI011 T'YN 0116 MFA bt-MF000] Ixl iM1 TREE 1 -e00 -43R -f tee RENCIE iFNCE COMPIDIm1 COMIFICId1 mDFAaOUD Wpef CDMp1Cim1 01111RIf.IM M WORK. 'MALL TAE DME m BE LE M BRWY c W mxonDx AT THE END a EMN Gr. CODES AND STANDARDS" MDEp(NOIRD FOIN WNRILIW GONIRM,•iOR snEwaRlt WNIW41011 WNBVLIM ABBREVIATIONS DRAWING INDEX co11RILTDR CONTRICTOF POWF11 DlsmNxR.'1! Ilio BDx taFRRADtaR c6xIRADTa R R B E N B _ e ). DE CMORKTmE SIWL SIASIYJD THE OWNERS PRaPE1TT mR� '� Stall AM B•lYGEO PROFYAII' M IME ONNER m ONGRI•L COMdIDM 011 BETTER a O m BE THE RFSVHb1RU1Y M ER WNTVGTRR m IDUTE Nl ExswD uMmEs, rmEB1ER sHDWN HEREIN OR MOF. AND m PANRELt THEM FROM OAIULF. THE OONIRICIME SIWL BFM ILL FCPRSFS fM REPNR OB NP1IN.9ENt M UTNE aB OT6 "DILL GVA•L4D M WM TE ENLNIDM M WOmC N. THE CMI1RICiOR 9U1L BE RESPMSIBIE fM TIE LGPIEIE THa 1RTIL 11E JOB R COWLLTEO PFR UJLG f0. NL COISIRIKTAW WORK SWLl LOHFORY m 11E U.SG AID NL ODER GOhAWNG LADES. NDNG WNI THE CMANxJG FESPLTIVE CODES Ii. TIE LOIJiMIDImt ND .41 FIBCMIIPICIOPS SHGL lU1PLY WM NL IlxX LOM IETMAIR]MS AMID STATE OFPARTYFM M ldS1N•L kenwmS AID DM1EIMI M xDV5TD1 SNEIY (OFN)) REmA1ARTS RFPEA m 11E LOGES SECTION M ills SHEET. MFEB OR:MlIRt ! IEiFA BR LCMRILIMI fD1JIBIfiDR 1llfA NEIN UIF11Y Mlml Mm0FD1 A AIPEAE M AYYEIFA BIDE BT0.DN0 K CNEAFt BIIFIIAt AYP FRME(PAING C8 GT01 BASIN AFT ABOVE FFHI mocR GL CFHIFA WE A/O MO,£ GROIMD CEUNG S COAG CONCRETE AC AYPF]E xITEARUPING LMACTY mMtT. mNSTNIcroM GB DN[IXI BRFNaA DET. CED,11. LT011 w C/ICUI CET. DETAIL GE GENERA CN Ol•AlTEIE GEN GENERATOR Fo � A JNJCID11iBOX UNIX CN CONN RVA xIDALT MPf1E(5) IX Ndl Y FIEF UlS11RAL YR YAMYL TB(JNFA SWIRJI m EOIPIRIE � NOIFNSED Nat N CONWM.T 005E Ea151oD PHIL PMFl FIG IRNG PH PINSE Gl GyDE PC ppLyyyl0. pxgpE CXV. GLLVN® RCPT RECEFtILIE OIX CRDIM NR RRN CALVIN SIFll HL. NIXLDF III W sWlTal A1PWt-n ..... PR0.ELT NFORWIDN AMD GEIRAN IDIFS A1PW2�1 ..... SITE PLM A,PIMO ..... fMMX.F➢ SIZE RAN A1PINZt Al ..... /JIIFHU RiDRWTXN AND TONER EIEVATIOM Sa1MID - AAiS (1(1) - STNRYJD GEN a a M" 3 EDLIPIETTI CABNER RNT a ETEVADC)N VFWS SIAMW W - AE (1) ' slN PEACF31 EOUPYEM V9NET RN! ! ELLVATION NEWS STNLRRD - A,s StNDV10 511E xPRO•FB1IX1 SPRiTGTDNS 1;� stND.VD-ASS1) - iV1ClJ0 SPFCFlGIDMS F.•LJO•AD - E15 17 - stN ETFCIRNYI SPECMGTDNS SIMMID - E]S 1)) - SINDWD INFIRM ! GMt GRWMOBD SPEGf1GlIMLS SWbAO - FS (1) - StNDND IMENN RMY NSGWATION SPEGf1G1MN4 ••,�••••.••••,•••� NL COIRINIC11011 SIMl COIRSY FDI TIE IAlFS1 AOOAFD FLI11D11 M 11E iOl1OMJG PUBIYalD16 1. ASN (A1IEAIOVJ SOCEtt iM lES1I1C TMD WlERWS) 2 My (NEAGH CONI NSlflUflj 1 TSC (NEIeG1H1 NBRNIE Dc SBD W18TNRTW) A. '� W1DNC CDOE) T 1 UBC IRIFORY BUIBNG CCOfj S. ANSI (NJESOtA MPARB , M TPIMPOI1tA1DN) T. IJA WTDWL STM0.V W5 N511N1E) EEE M F]£mWK AM F111TRONCS F1IGMJFAS N. TEL 1b1NL EIELIRFK WOE) 7 10. NEW 16.1 ERDIi6CK fl•IxFNRMRS A50CNTKMI) Il. NEW WIMMAL FBECIRYOL $•EEIY COYYRSION) IL OSIN xCCLPATDNV. SNDY ANO HEALTH ABIDNRiMTDN) IS LL (UIDERMpf105 VBOINTORH& MG) 11 APRYlBE IDG( CODES ND MLWII•JICES 11101 URI('/ UINY WATER TOWER SITE ROOFTOP SITE Bd fIJNRDp R F6IWID R 1101 iUlxBm R MSEWEO R BR PtAliO1N T-YOBIIE CONRACIdf ROMTOP M1ipW T-YOBRL COMR/LFlOR BR MTOI01 imALAIRN COIfIR.•L•1011 CONPICIOR ROOFTOP AMFNIN StID/ATTACHx]II T-WBIF COIEIRAmM (�)T-ItlBRE CONIRIDIM lC (POMflt/RCO) T -EDRF WIIBOCI011 m GJ1rEr T-wa♦E NgOFMAIl011 BW CABBET T-YOeaE BgE]Ra AUON BR CABNEIS T-Y091E RPIppBNpN BR OEBNEIS T-YOBBE YP11lvEEN1AlON AMIEHIA T-WBBE LOMRULTM NEIDBN T -MDSE CONMIDIM CUAX CIBIE T-YOBIE Cann ip1 CGVI GBEE T-EGRE MMIRACIOF LEGEND JINPFR iJRFS T-YOBIE WNIRIDIgI JllllkA GBIII T -TORE CpIMACI011 1W (1011 NUR AYIRSIEI) T -MATE CpNIRICIgi LW QOI NOISE NPLOW0 T-WOIE OpNtRIDIMI _ 12 TIE CaNtRNTaE SWLL OBTAIN IND PAY iM AR PERY115, lRbbES LAID NSPECTDHR IECESSWt' fM PERFONYNLE M THE WORK AIJ1 NLIIDE TIOSE N 11E [OF OF TE MOIaTOTHEGIINIEYL 13. FIGUIEp dYOISCIR HIVE PRELEDINCE WFR OPAWNGSGlE ANp DETAE OBAWCIGR INN: PREOE0010E GVflI SNVL ORMMGS LHFLK NY,yPN,Y M NS ONIFISDIS IN TE MEID. U W SAECFICGLY NOTED, W NM FABRIGTE NIY WTEANlS OFF -SBE M PFAFMN AR CmSTR1DIDN IMI( 1M ACCMVLY M DRAWING ENE11SD1D WVE BED( NTRED M.VISi ACIIYL FlE1D OFIFILa011S V. UNFIL FEET rn rnY0NG1 111E ZEIN TF1 YRL 16~46 WIAR Ln1ANEIX15 WP IYP,GL U/G uxDEACRMINO Pl R n W WAM OR WRE REO'D. RM"REE, w WEAnIEAPRccf N'H11 WATIIKKIR NEI£A SfNIlF4 SREL SS FEET UNO UNLESS Nc= pTHFRNRE SRL SIWJI 5pp5 $PECFIGIDHS M. StN10.M0 yY,FTBA95• StNDAID - xls (1j - STANOND FIFLTRKIL SPilaFIG1R]Il4 MIEIYL MOTs Sf.VxMRD - Na5 (1) - $L•JJGJD COISIRUCIION SPECFM:MIImR c01ERI1 NOTES sIE£T 1 2 SPFCIFIGIXNE F - I1) GFENEAIL NOMiSHEET STNOVD - sls (1) - StANGRO EmEFRENI %AWDN IDLRDATICN _ (()) P smno q MD OEtI u; STANO•AO - SE (1) - STINONO Em1F1ENt PLATFORM FJf1UAOM. WAwWME BIAQ SRTIFlG1101E MTAE HIUIIBER T DETAIL GRdI1OB1G MRS FOR CGVI T�gRE CONRACIOR 4ROIl1DItl qR FM GUY TSE CtlBRKTM SIZE UROIIpJ• INElf1B115 COMIRICIG COIJIRAGTM 511E QOIIIGII• W10W5 CMRILIpI LMTRIDIOR ANIFIM\ AnAC1AATS (TORR() T-E1osE mNnucTm MBNRa4 YMAEINO vsE ! eRln¢r r-YOBBE mNmICIMI Sl ORAWNC OM WNCN mDONINL MTAL ,RIS DRAFM BINM DEIDIES DETK R 011 SINE mOIIID ANffHN YMRBMO PPE ! BRI T-YOBIE LONIRIDIdE R(I COM ATOl1BRB4 NNRICIM COMRRI011 IBMECI..IDE BRDM (RPT m M) T-YOBNE CONIRICIM UDFAGROUEp WlN( CWIWLTmi CmEIRKTM OoR00 T-YOBEE WNMICIOR (DER DlAC1EepJ15 BIIEAtlR CWIPNDMI CMTRAC1�E iFNM CONIRIGIOR COMIRILIM POWFTI OCGONA.i ! YEIEA BO% CGIIRIDImI CONIPICIW IR✓DEACAdmO WORK fANIRAOIOR CONIIIIDImI YEIEII U1R11Y UIFRY A 11. DONRILtME SWLL MOM! INE RIGNfDI M NK LONRICR OR ORCREPIIF6 WHIN THE COMP/Ot DOW11Elfis WM TE CMJTFIDI OOWIIENIS ND TIIE F1F1D COIDRDIS PBDF ro fLaiUDNG TIE alma M WFSIIOIL =DN LEHFA A SECTION 52 FEII 51RUCt. SIRUCITPIl T.G TM M LUAB T.OP. 1M M PAYING TMP. F, v T.OS TOMP M SIID T/ i w B/ BOTTOMw M _ _ BR -�..w M -•mm W ..-..W.-� Is MR "INMR, ow-GEWINS STNNAU -565 (I) - FMGRD ANTENW ANO COAX CABLE MFNJAIRM SPRaF1GIDN5 $RFAOIOf CmBNICIM CONPACIOR PONFII CRCmxECt ! 11EIER Bmf CONN IOR CONRYCIOF S) ORAIIxD ON WINCH ORIGx1EL SELTION 'PS ORAIBI BIAKK Ofl10IF5 SECTIO(( R M SAYE DRAFRD 11ElER Illlllil' UIEl1Y mum a MAYO I M V rML xYmQ Tata IORC Y NJRF: TIR DPIEBR• WB Itl1 BRIT PLBLSXFD ND R INE SOIE PRMERIY M T-YC9IE - YNXEVpB WX¢t ND R TEM m TIE BgiRMEA FOII n1FA IN IO ° ` uM ONLY AND M a19MMRDN OF, qe"'y' W1y a'°L'HI. PI°" 'P"IRmIb"Y, pa'E M mR eY ukv nrl m,ecl PwMFw ale 1 an a tlull Lb�E Pml�brd EigMMw aqr iM Yw• W B+ Sla1N Ef Yrvlsln HALLA NURSERY Al P902 PROJECT INFO. &GENERAL NOTES I T/1q.9E BsxD FM PRanYt RN1 F0• w 0. RCm! RR T/10/Oe ®w xv • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ T Mob TK LGM K 1MR aawAN BG1Ra1IFA THE S ND AMIf m RENNI O LPd T AID MRAS 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. CIWJ)iFSSFN, MINNESOTA 11 e . COM 11MT I FRL NOT BE REPRCMMY COED. IFNE a oHEAR15f D�oxn M DREcrLr OR wBEX:ILr, xDII Gsln FDR (Arc PLB1W15E oIH6 THNX F10.a1 rt R ^ ••I ` r+.. �� 'Y .Mm w NR MINNEAPOLIS MARKETFl,NLmxD '�•• O�M•.FA .m FLJNE (FIE NUFNwwR�I Al P902 -Tl xM 1 ... MMRa11 JFM ' T • ! ♦ ] 2 HALLA NURSERY \ !� I eunxc unxc*41,`\ \\ 0 EWSIx• PAaPFaIY tAE _ / — $ T-w•Ee ,S' a w `G I lFA4 NEA \ \ ./ 04 I \\ o T-YOaE lwY - tFASE NIFA \ j0 \ � ACCESS AG10 •WCm • � IAEA I NEW 1•'b' RAE )) \ ` \ \ ALCE4 ADN I \ \ t \ ` I 1 ' I I jl� , s , I . I Z. I it -W pEp----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- -----------------_--- F SITE PLAN sure ,• - erc-o- ea eNe nvmN eras °� wrm w n v eema eoms enws nw w•wa o Nmrf T16 oAI••M trs Nm m rtaeaea NW � IreNY ewWy Met MY Pen s nrwl o M mr w wM+ rn a�.et �wweN ii'wt'i "ew NURSERY HALLA 1 lim/M 61AD FOR PAOPo511 •w �. a MAAV ... T/]O/C• ■ ■ ■ T ■ ■ Mob • M A[ snc rAorExir a r-Mose - r•EAraa twat NO a 1D(r y. THE BCmNRFn FCR 1tE]1 � � rear, Nn x CDIeL!]M,pM of 11E ILMI 4116 oAI••c, 1HE BCNtE]•FA PR0166 eea a ani trwr rA,�wd Enelrr utlr Sr lew eI Me Slob e/ tEnnerob. Al P902 SITE PLAN 0®w es ■ 11 e No AY' RS ro ecTurM rt urs, Fm16T IID NilE6 TIM rt •aE Nor eE AFP0.000CE•, osm, tars. anu•Ee Damm a OPx.TV s xowmET. rnr ` et•r- �� N/oEv 10000 GREAT PLANS BLVD. Maw es usn rs wH ruEroa ortEA THN, weoi o s m CHANFUSSEN, MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS MARKET "" •u a" aMAm A7 P902-Ct 1 NYIINI aNelO trE - m o r o ew rEE Wm - m ❑ r O Nm usm - m o r o nue m r+ •ll•mtl �.. T ■ s a s x + T-YO■•E all NNlE T-Ia6E i111URE T-Y0■■E NRFMN FMIE P PPS AIIIF0IN Fl1UPIEM PIAiTORY T -110011E AHIF]•NS F.PIIPYFNf FIC1N0 P CARYEIS T-WB■E T-YOiF 'M`hUIICE FwlIP11DR BRIOCE fUTFPIN NNIS T-YPiE �'-0' T-YC9E IGY MEA EOIlY11FMT file■EIS T -ISE Al11cr" +lO1RO■n •VOET OtP) 34'-0• T-YOB■E FDIfiD NEA I ----------- x_x I I T-wOelE Mtll At1 N N i FfllcE ./(3)3) SIRArDS ■/•• I 1 I B1 O 1 OwG•/N � I I I I' 1 IEA9E NEA ± � i P � S1fE 91�E NIIPSI IMUREI N1111EII I ■ • 1 / / 1 II • 1 3 ^ 1 T-YOB■I: MIIF1■M4 I iILN0120 1 - I Nllm T-I•rE I • I 82 NrmnA FA 120 __—__—__—__—__—__ J__ + __'II ___ _ ___________ _________�__\-- • 51 T-YOaE NIIFMN T -11001E 150'-0'` T-itle■E'■WOOI 011 SIRL RIfX FOR �W` I 1 K E1flCi1■O IEIFA •/06mNE(.T 2W gQp (Pro.10FFO r mT11RTG1PR) Am•E T-ROBRE PIpPOSm a OZ. 1T® NIIEMr FIO■IP xW B1•IEA iAHUC A1D IA+IPscwE nauc ■ —__—__—__—__—__—__—__—__—__—__—__—__—_____—__—__—_____—_____—__—__—__� i i 161E IEV ACO6S mum IE1 fAWFl AmES RO10� z vFmn •n1I su•rtt. I i ■ I t1OSIN0 ■ • I I ■ 1 � � Mw 1E1■clE ruler-ARa•o NEA I I e I I 1 I ' J I F� 0 1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN A SU1E t/a' � f 4 16 rn r+rM ®ns °®' rMOYY a R n a rtYl Oma rw•a rrw a 11R11M. qr a�'^m"°^• °"�F°" ' t•Rpenxp HALLA NURSERY f TAW scum FOR PRONSY •" IGI 116 1■P»s 1Ne 1m 91x11 w.mm A1• 611E SPIE P0.0PFI11Y Oi T-W9■E - 1NF/PwE odrny 1b ulel M Z R uMR Rr arsi ..wvl+r � I Rn a N/ lld,� P,ol�le„d F+,Y9,r A7 PS02 ®R rn • •1AFf MO B IFM! m IIE 90RR06t1 ' nm `""`""` 1x PI T. M• w mawPAnox E utlr er k99 a1 itr Sler i Iwrror. R RUOOY T/m/Pe ENLARGED SITE PLAN a®R 9111 • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ T Mobile 11E IpW OF 116 MUwC. 11E wW11fMA Ag6Ei AIO MiRS m REIIIw P IAYII 6W6T Np MRRS 10000 GREAT PWNS BLVD. T1w rt Ru Ip! r MPROPIlID. mFEo, OR an1TAl11sE 9aosee a 9■Ecnr PR ■o■■>:ay.T. 111M1 ` r+.. �'� 1 Y wm R � 1® mR NE PV•'OSE OR■A 1HW r■Gl rt is CWJlHASSEN, MINNESOTA MINNEAPOLIS MARKET F+Mre•n na5x �.,, •••• •a.l..e.. rw a.... Www•I .■r N w1m A7 P902 -C2 1 IIrYI OYIO 11Y[ -160 r ❑ ew A[ IlY1m - 16 o r o 1nm Vuro - ro O r O u6 W. .1t PYA aw e T a a T-IEQE ANIENIU4 FAO"O Sq B I BI ■ T-WBAE i ml i ClWnii( a •4aAtE ■ s II 11 N0. mA44 aaE N0. TYPE _ T-NOaE ANTn COrIIFfi110I1 IfIC01 PA. CBlgl COBE I ffl l le-0SOP I FAC"B 1W P I L Rs ,eP 1 s/e• TRIPIE mn 1 �Fultim CMiiM ANIENNB P r I - m tm' 1 S/B' 0018E ISD A3 MIME ` _ I �FYRIiE CNUaA AM1ENlA5 8 Bl 86'r1e-0mP lm _ 1 I n IeP t s/e' TITLE YElla m Itl65-,e-0mP I v �NT11DE vsaR Axm•ws n tea' t s/e• o01aE Ynla■ As1w• AIP902-A1 1 n - - (5) YUIDN sen 1.Orl■ — m o e O ua• n[ w AtPa015t sw Ct 8e'.�1e-0SOP Sq P 131 1q 1 !/e• BWE to 1w 1 5/e• TIRIE BIIIE ITioxo�vaLE IW M6S-te-WM Sq v M law t 5/a,qVD 411E Ill IeP , s/e' BBI1•E ale p x 2 4 R � T-40mE mt w MIFq•I •/ECIIREIP fI8E15 }, i; 1 F A ` A ` SOUTH ELEVATION C2 scala ,'. o -a A an 01n r`� ^�•■ °rP Arap/p r n x , TAP/aL 1 MOM PBOPFi511 e'e • aE uY1ENw ■c eBAnaT J1111Pf1t CAe1F (YYP) ENLARGED ELEVATION ar■aav w•a■a rDllaf TIaS 11RMYiC ILAs xm ad P11BleaL I 6 llE RAf PPOPFAIY aF T-Itle■F - INFAPSI � BER 6 LTl1f ro 11E BrDOYRR iOR TI■■1 T M o i e LpiLfIB•L IR£ OIaT. MD N CP94NnKN CF • TIE NW aF T6 ORMM, MOM PRaI! ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ A1D ARm3 ro Pnf1"1 rt UPON aaIFST AID Ad T1uT rt Nal xm a Brseaouvn. mPrD. fart B PfIGN6E CFO Bf B■ECILY M ■IBIRFLTLT. e /ann•,A AID (64011 GBIE a➢Il■IEYFNa IaTn•S N0. mA44 aaE N0. TYPE SEC10N 1s5 LI (51I&SW COrIIFfi110I1 IfIC01 PA. CBlgl COBE Al ffl l le-0SOP v P BI 1eP 1 S/e' •m Rs ,eP 1 s/e• TRIPIE mn Al P P M iw , s/e• qIW mM•5-ts-MOP m tm' 1 S/B' 0018E ISD A3 MIME - - 4rarrr 8 Bl 86'r1e-0mP lm P ri 1•P I s/B' Y¢ig1 n IeP t s/e' TITLE YElla m Itl65-,e-0mP ,m v Ya tm' ji 5/C OILYB lm1 n tea' t s/e• o01aE Ynla■ As1w• AIP902-A1 1 n - - (5) YUIDN sen 1.Orl■ — m o e O ua• n[ w AtPa015t sw Ct 8e'.�1e-0SOP Sq P 131 1q 1 !/e• BWE to 1w 1 5/e• TIRIE BIIIE m M6S-te-WM Sq v M law t 5/a,qVD 411E Ill IeP , s/e' BBI1•E ale 1 ! 1 F9R YIOm eiOl•1ATIBN RETER TB STNDVD ORN•D ES Na1FS t. ANIEIIIM vale 1n,4116 xwe and I'I.Va. vac Ln6rNs Lalm Am APP■OX•NTE AND IRE IATI S DIo10m ro a 19B Fm FAmRAIDE B1E ro Fm camera C scltrl ANIDns vac 1EYiC11a aGleem wr vARf F%IY 1n611a TABLUTFL L ILL ILREI•IA/L'O41 Gab TO a COIDR Lmm AT n■aE (]) mGl101a 196 1/Y ROE P.c 6mITa0IL TIDE A lOP a iBam (IMENw Lem) s BASE W 11MR c a ars valEr BOIaEL:mN Ma g 1 Nan+WC3) Otal3 SY11 IIRIlE 6Ra1•D ars a■01■Dm AT n■EE (» PO"R a TtTREN AS FOlLDRS: A TOP OF T1NER iANiF11M lNE1) BILE DO IEOIPMUILY rar••nm ro TO•FA. IL BPIroN a TPAEIt ONE ElD IEOMNGLLIY mlllEilm ro YAT BYR. C AT M BR (1DIEf COIDFf.110N POD(. ♦ AMffl■NS FCR fACN Sm1BR 5"41 a SPILID AT MOI Lffi IIIW I P -O' APARf. s. ANILT•N sEc,B■s sY41 a Ir.Eall® •TTN t■1E I1Brtn1 Ass slaD1 p1 M 511E "AE w1iETc NORIA 623' FALT 6 TIES NORIIE E911 ANTENNA REQUIREMENTS ANTI"NY Faw Caz N0. TYPE y�pR 1a•TN w CIXlNI VIBE I 1s5 LI (51I&SW - m' I 1/A• _ ; a r„•'a"°w4 HALLA NURSERY F �'" �„•"�', 1 •„ , •IN Lic iW P„Yrerr ErgY4r e0o .. a4i Al P902 • N•• al 1M StW r 1•nn•a•la. 11 N11p°Y T/'0/0° ANTENNA INFO. &TOWER ELEVATION • 1RJPF,. NYSEY 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. 4rarrr "n CHANHf55FN, MINNESOTA CHAN = r r lTt� m nY+wn rx xuLi B■I.46 1■Aao ■I.v � As1w• AIP902-A1 1 ra■ - m o s o ow r.[ ram - m o e ❑ sen 1.Orl■ — m o e O ua• n[ w AtPa015t sw ,41 View of crane at Location 1 looking from the back door of the Vogel House View toward preferred location from front door of summer kitchen ( view blocked by house) View of Location 1 from driveway between house and garage View of Location 1 from end of north driveway at Great Plains Boulevard I Al, View of Location 1 taken east of summer kitchen addition View of Location 1 looking northwest from east shoulder of Great Plains Blvd at Creekwood V/ `Mai , IWO View of Location 2 from front yard of Vogel House ji, px,virm, t - - I - , AN---'A , � 'Mir F .. 1 .a Fy� e41r.- iy.. View of Location 1 from driveway between house and garage View of Location 1 from end of north driveway at Great Plains Boulevard rY' . Crane - 4i;.�.. •' � `fir' I View of Location I from east shoulder of Great Plains Blvd (Vogel House to the right in the trees) View of Location 1 taken from front yard of Vogel House View of Location I taken east of summer kitchen addition View of Location I looking northwest from east shoulder of Great Plains Blvd at Creekwood VIE 61 v ..: `1 eFsdYd��4• "Ethnic Tradition and Innovation as Influences on a Rural, Midwestern Building Vernacular" (Findings From Investigation of Brick Houses in Carver County, Minnesota) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA M. Steven Cleo Martens IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE September, 1988 VI. EFFECT OF MATERIAL AND BUILDING TECHNOLOGY ON HOUSE FORM. A. Choice of material: Chaska (and to a lesser extent Carver) was an important center for the production of building brick. The brickmaking industry dominated the local economy and drew upon trained workers from all ethnic groups. In time, brick from Chaska came to be associated with Germanness, since most of the yards were owned and operated by German -Americans between 1865 and the closing of the last brickyard in the mid - twentieth century. Parallel with their Swedish and Irish neighbors (three nationalities account for most of the settlement of Carver County during the late 19th century) the Germans show a preference for the cream -colored common brick produced in Chaska. In fact, they went to considerable inconvenience to transport the material on horsedrawn sleds, over difficult mads and steep terrain, distances of up to 30 -miles. Charles van Ravenswaay has written of the German settlers west of St. Louis that ".. . buildings entirely of brick were of higher status, and, hence, prosperous settlers frequently opted for all -brick construction. Such was the prestige of brick that it became the predominant material of later German houses . , ,"105, wally made brick, with appearance characteristics specific to its place of manufacture, provides a significant link in the historical geography of German settlement in the Minnesota River Valley. It also held a prestige value in terms of both its durability and the notion of a higher level of craftsmanship associated with its production and use. B. Brick production: Local brickmaking processes are relevant to the study of the farmhouses because the selection of material, procuring and transporting it, and crafting it into houses all affected the appearance of the completed structures and the builders' image of the 105 Charles van Ravenswaay. The Arts and Architecture of German Settlements in Missouri. (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1977); p. 225. 53 place they were creating. The effect of material and craftsmanship on the appearance and character of the farmhouses bears analysis. The bricks used in the very early houses (Vogel; Teich; Rietz) were produced by a scove- kiln or "clamp" process. This method entailed piling the bricks in the open and then firing the pile without benefit of a kiln enclosure. (The outer layers of brick contained the heat necessary for the inner bricks to "mature".) Bricks produced by this process are relatively soft and their sizes and coloration vary widely. The bricks observed at each of the houses referenced here are also somewhat undersized (2" high x 3-3/4" x 7-3/4"), compared with the later module of commercial brick production (2-1/4" x 3-7/8" x 8- 1/4").106 Later bricks are also distinguished by the "frog" or depressed surface on one face which occasionally bears the name "Chaska" (see Fig. 6.1). C. Physical characteristics of indigenous "Chaska" brick: "Chaska Brick" is the definitive term for a whole class of masonry products having buff or yellow brick properties. While bricks were manufactured in virtually every community with alluvial clay deposits throughout Minnesota, the characteristic material which is still evident throughout Carver County today is the "Chaska' brick. Production of this particular brick was associated with a single place of manufacture.107 Empirically, it is a relatively soft, modular brick (1500-2000 psi) which was favored principally as a common brick backup with sound structural properties. The consistency which was characteristic of Chaska brick was likely the feature that made it a standard for structural backup. However, the attribute which is most typically associated with Chaska Brick is its uniform "cream" color. The aesthetic properties of Chaska brick are special, if not unique. Actually, there are visual properties which make Chaska brick desirable even within a contemporary market, and yet, they are 106 (Brick dimensions; regulated by law in Germany and by custom in the United States; generated modular coursing of four vertical courses equals one -foot.] 107 [Over time, there were sources for masonry materials with similar appearance and structural properties, but no other native brick in Minnesota is so conspicuously associated with its single place of production .] 54 largely irreproducible; the properties which make Chaska brick so appealing cannot be recreated.108 D. Appearance Characteristics: There is frequent mention in newspapers from the late 1800s of the "cream -colored" brick of Chaska, drawing upon the comparison to brick of the "Cream City" (Milwaukee); so known because of the brick manufactured there. In fact, there are several reasons why the comparison between Milwaukee and Chaska brick is significant. Milwaukee was largely settled by the same German/North European population group as the Minnesota River Valley, although about a generation earlier. Census records indicate that by 1900, brickworkers in the Chaska yards were about evenly divided between German-speaking immigrants direct from northern Europe and those who came from the Milwaukee area. I suggest that cream — butterfat; the richest of all milk products -- made an imagistic association with prosperity which appealed to both the brickmakers and the other settlers of two largely dairy regions. Associating this particular brick with cream was not just a clever marketing ploy in the mode of a 20th -century ad executive, though. Having scrutinized about 100 buildings built of Chaska brick, I can think of no adjective which would more accurately characterize its color. Quite frankly, "buff" or "tan" does this material a grave injustice. Ochre approximates it, but the rich, luminous qualities which the brick exhibits, and the narrow range of its rose- to yellow -blend, honestly invite comparison to some natural substance. The richness of the color blend, which I have tried to show in this manuscript by selective color photos, may be made more evident by a drive around the Carver County countryside in fall sunlight, noticing the color harmony between Chaska -brick farmhouses and the corn stubble which remains in the field. Such a characterization is subjective, but I insist that there is an irradescent quality (possibly produced by the 108 (In 1986, an effort was made, without success, to match traditional Chaska bricks with a special "run" using Chaska -native clays and a modern tunnel kiln.) 55 sand used in molding the surface) of these lime -rich bricks which is an almost -perfect match to autumn fields under late afternoon sunlight. The blend of brick colors even picks up the reddish color of willow brush volunteering on the bottomland. I would never represent that this is in any way a deliberate intervention by the makers of the brick, but its contemporary appeal is enhanced by appropriateness within a natural (native) context. The contemporary appearance of the brick farmhouses in their context reflects an acquired "fit" with their place, similar to organic materials which develop a patina over time. The previous assessment is necessarily offered in subjective terms. After careful scrutiny of the case study structures I remain convinced that words and ASTM tests are poor substitutes for the firsthand experience of the impression I am trying to illustrate. Critical readers are encouraged to spend a spring or fall day making a drive out to observe any of the Chaska -brick structures I am describing. Light is very responsive to the brick surface, and the brick mortar unifies the whole masonry surface visually as well as structurally; lending a warmer cast to the wall by virtue of the reddish sand used as aggregate in the mortar of several of the houses. (Gruenhagen/Eckmann is representative; Fig. 7.29.) Bricks produced in Chaska/Carver at different times exhibit slightly different coloration, subjectively described as more or less "lively". Finally, many of the characteristics of common brick which give it contemporary appeal are, in fact, attributes which the makers of early brick sought to minimize. These include the "nubby" colors, odd shapes, mixed colors and immature "hearts", rounded corners, and irregular powdery sufaces. As an inert building material, Chaska brick could not be characterized as "unique"; it is actually quite similar to common brick produced at numerous other sites. As mentioned previously, however, it is closely associated with many structures in communities southwest of the Twin Cities where it was used as face brick, as well as a backup or utility brick. E. Production Qrocesses which affect appearance: A chart and diagram are attached (see Appendix E), indicating sites in Chaska where brick was produced at different times. This chronology allows us to determine sources of 56 brick furnished to build the farmhouses, based on the time period when particular brickplants were in operation.109 Still, it is necessary to recognize that regardless of which brickmaker produced the material for any individual farmhouse, the color, quality, and physical character of bricks made by various operators were remarkably consistent from one brickyard to the next. Most articles written about color characteristics of fired clay have tended toward simple explanations. "Basically bricks burned to either a red or cream color depending on the type of clay available and the amount of heat applied." This concise statement is generally accurate and as much as needs to be known for very general discussions of the material. McKee has written much more comprehensively about the effect of various chemical "impurities" on the color of fired clay bodies.110 An article about the cream -colored properties of Milwaukee area clays accurately states, "... brick burns cream color owing to the presence of a large amount of carbonate of lime."111 Master kiln operators possessed much common wisdom about these variables and their consequences. Principle among their concerns was the need to achieve an appropriate balance between absorption and hardness. Visual effects were controlled to some extent by manipulation of several variables in the firing process. They included the following, all of which combined in effect to produce a particular apperance: a. Kiln environment; (extent to which firing is subject to or deprived of oxygen). b. Type of fuel used in firing, which may also starve the brick of oxygen. Wood resulted in a neutral or slightly reduced environment except in certain locations of the kiln. Oil tended toward a reduced environment. Gas created a very oxidized environment which also produced numerous "hearts'; (rose colored, underfired centers visible withen a surround of mature, cream coloration.) c. Length of firing and ultimate temperature achieved. 109 Note that even though county residents almost unanimously associate 'Chaska" brick with the Klein brothers' brickyards, virtually all the county farmhouses were built before the Klein brothers became involved with brickmaking in 1893.1 110 Harley McKee. "Brick", in Introduction to Eady American Masonry. National Trust for Historic Preservation (New York: Columbia University, 1973). 111 "Sketch of the Literature of Clay" in The Briickbuilder. Boston: Brickbuilder Publishing Co., vol. 6 (June, 1894). 57 d. Location within the kiln (exterior and interior buff brick have generally been subjected to lots of oxidation and no reduction). e. Other variables too numerous to identify (although the variables were intuitively known and controlled by the master kiln operators). Significantly, much of the character of the early Chaska "common" brick was the result of a scove- or intermittent, beehive -kiln firing environment which was much more heavily reduced (oxygen starved) than can be achieved in modem tunnel kilns. The use of wood as a fuel source also contributed toward this "irreproducible" character. The especially strong influence of kiln type and fuel for burning of brick mean that it is probably impossible within contemporary product standards and brickmaking technology, to achieve the same cream color even though the same native clay body is used. Brick produced near Chaska is similar in many respects to brick manufactured north of St. Cloud in that both are ochre or buff -colored (also described as a "watered-down" yellow color). Bricks with a pinkish cast are underburned and those with a "greenish" cast are slightly overbumed. The selection and sorting of brick for appearance characteristics was appropriate to the place of their intended use on a building. After a firing was completed, the brick were usually hand selected for various applications, with bricks possessing the most desireable appearance being reserved for the most visible locations. Distinct changes in color range can be easily detected as the comer is turned from a front- to side -elevation. Clay deposits are the product of finely broken-down silica and alumina rock formations, and in the case of the Minnesota River Valley, they seem to have been transported over some considerable distances by prehistoric streams before "sedimenting out" at the place where those streams emptied into Glacial River Warren. The different chemical constituents (impurities) in the day on opposite banks of the river valley reveal that the clays originally came from distant and opposite directions. There are several reddish or salmon -colored farmhouses (which I have interpreted as "Henderson" brick built after 1900, although similar iron -rich brick is also characteristic of Shakopee) in near proximity to the Chaska brick houses of Young W America and Camden townships. Hamburg and Mayer, in particular, are sites where iron -oxide brick was popular for homebuilding. The second Wendelin Grimm house (#025, at the edge of Uketown Township near Chanhassen) is of similar coloration, though Chaska cream -colored bricks are evident in the foundations of a granary structure on the same farmstead. As a rule, the reddish -colored farmhouses are generally of the later Foursquare plan. Brickmaking was a craft with a long history, but the last half of the 19th century marked a period of significant change in the methods of its production. Many of the changes reflected mere "tinkering" or adjustment and refinement of extant processes. With each progressive modification, a more predictable end result was achieved, though changed technology inevitably altered the appearance characteristics of native brick after 1900. F. Methods of transport: Interestingly, most of the brick used in the rural farmhouses was transported from Chaska by horsedrawn sleds in the winter when roads were frozen. (Midwinter was also the time of year when farmworkers could be away from the farm the length of time necessary to make the frequent trips to the brickyards.) My interviews with descendents of original settlers turned up two interesting accounts of hauling brick from Chaska to build their houses. Arthur and Orville Wolter (see survey #040) have a diary which records the daily quantities of brick delivered to their farmsite. Even though the distance from Chaska to their farm is perhaps the greatest of any brick farmhouse in the county, they delivered loads (of as many as 5365 total pieces on one day), each day except Sunday during the months of December, 1873 and January, 1874112 On the eastbound leg of each trip, logs of oak, elm, and linden were hauled either to Chaska or to a sawyer along Bevens' or Carver Creek for milling into lumber. 112 (Mr. Wolter indicated that he believed 400 brick represented one load for a two -horse team. Note additional discussion of this subject elsewhere in this thesis under the case study of the Ziermann/Melichar House; Chapter VIII.) 59 In other case study examples, cordwood was exchanged for brick at the brickyard site. According to Mr. Hilbert Ziermann, cordwood was hauled from their family farmstead to Chaska during January of 1899. The sled drivers unloaded the wood and then onloaded the brick before staying overnight in Chaska. Teams of horses then hauled sledloads of about 1200 brick up the hill from Chaska the next day. It was Ziermann's understanding that the hill up from Chaska was much steeper at that time than in the present day. G. Stonework foundations bricklayers and masons; influence of local craftsmen. Early histories of the county indicate that in addition to the laborers actually involved in brick production at Chaska, many of the farmstead settlers had brickworking experience in their backgrounds. I have also been told, but cannot confirm, that many area farmers produced brick on the farm for their own consumption using the clamp (scove) kiln method, where the unfired brick forms its own firing chamber. While this claim could conceivably be supported in very early structures near the river (such as the Vogel House), I find it rather unlikely that brick clay existed at outlying sites in the county, given the distribution of alluvial soils suitable for brick clay. Five principle names may be associated with construction of brick houses during the early period of Carver County settlement, during which time the majority of farmhouses included in the general survey were built 113 The names of Olaf Hanson, Henry J. Kenning, J.S. Letford, Charles H. Klatt, Sr., and Albert Quast have been identified in the primary source literature. (Their work is said to have ranged "well out into the country".) Where very early houses structures were veneered over with brick, the work may well have been done by the farmsteaders themselves. Literature of the period 1865-75 indicates a general familiarity with masonry skills on the part of an unusually high percentage of German immigrants who were now yeoman farmers. Although there were at least two academically -trained architects living in Carver County prior to 1900, all of the houses discussed here were conceived by artisans trained 113 Traditionally, it was the master carpenters, who were then called 'carpenters and builders', who influenced the design of buildings mare than any other craftsmen." -Charles van Ravenswaay, German Settlements in Missouri; p. 295 in vernacular traditions "on the job". Further, no information has been found during the course of this investigation which can prove a direct connection between the Carver County farmhouses and any published builders' book plan. J.S. Letford did, however, advertise "Carpenter & Builder; Plans & Specifications furnished."114 Various other trades were closely involved in the building of brick houses. The numbers of various skilled trades resident in the county can be traced through census data at 10 - year intervals. Since the form of the houses seems so closely integrated with the material, we may expect that particular bricklayers, masons, plasterers and carpenters may have all exerted considerable influence over the final appearances of the farmhouses.115 Census records document 16 carpenters and 9 bricklayers working in the county in 1860; 22 carpenters and 5 bricklayers in 1870, although some of the tradesmen were engaged in other work and may not be identified. A significant majority were of German nativity.116 Several brick and stone masons worked in rural areas of the county at the time the farmhouses were erected. Though they may well have worked throughout the county, Art Schultz is said to be the stonecutter responsible for a good deal of the stone foundation work in the western parts of the county, including the Ziermann/Melichar house of my survey. A "Mr. Bahr" (or Baer) is believed to have worked in the Augusta area between Waconia and Chaska, where some of the more decorative brickwork can be observed on the farmhouses (such as the Schlegelmilch residence; #48). Lyman Noble worked primarily in the city of Chaska, while John Seims, Christian Bloecher and F. IGatte worked in the Laketown district. Finally, Leonard Grates was a skilled brick and stone mason who may have done a considerable amount of the work in Dahlgren and Benton townships as well as in Chaska. There are doubtless other itinerant bricklayer; whose names are lost to us. 114 The Carver County Democrat (Carver, MN): May 17 -Aug. 3, 1859, and in subsequent editions. 115 [Involvement in a wide range of business ventures seems to be the norm among immigrants in Carver County. Farmers worked as masons or carpenters, brickyard workers hired out as laborers in order to improve their prospects for prosperity. With labor as their principle resource, they were constantly working at some enterprise or another.] 116 [It is also noted that skilled tradesmen, including brickmasons, were exempted from military service in Prussia during the period before unification of the Reich.] 61 H. ftresentative details of construction: Even though the outward form of the farmhouses is similar, a wide range of masonry construction techniques are concealed beneath the surface. There are early examples of brick veneer over log structures (Rietz House, #28), a large number of conventional masonry bearing walls, and even some late houses which are masonry veneer over balloon -framing. The overall tendency, though, is to use the masonry as a loadbearing system on all exterior walls, with roof and floor joists framed into the masonry. Only a single instance of traditional Fachwerk construction (mortised heavy timbers and brick nogging) is known to have existed in the now demolished Henry Teich House (see Figs. 4.1 and 4.2). The masonry building techniques tend to be conservative, counter to the advent of innovative balloon -framing during the latter half of the nineteenth century. Another distinction from the later crosshouses and foursquare plans is that framing of the early brick structures is a one-way, single span with no interior bearing partitions. M uwl" oak VII. ANALYSIS OF PROTOTYPICAL STRUCTURES AND CASE STUDY HOUSES. One priority of this thesis has been to identify all the brick farmhouses of Carver County to allow for more exhaustive future investigation. By approaching the research project from an academic background, it has also been possible to recognize patterns between seemingly dissimilar structures. It is necessary to acknowledge, however, that the information presented here was compiled with the detachment of an outsider, and such detachment is limiting in several respects. I am not an authority on the history of any one of the case study houses, and I readily admit that many residents are better historians of the individual house they live in than I have become during my short involvement. This report only reveals a small part of the story about Carver County farmhouses. I have been reminded of this fact each time a long-time resident comes forward with further details of local history. The people I spoke with proved highly reliable and I commend the accuracy of their recollections. Their information has been confirmed by primary source histories and they have rarely tended toward any exaggeration or overstatement of the important details they have learned by word of mouth. Inaccuracies which may be discovered in this report are surely due to my own misinterpretation of information recounted to me. A. Tracing farmhouses through early Carver County prototypes: For several reasons, brick houses were built on Carver County farms slightly later (by about five to eight years) than similar houses in the towns of Chaska and Carver. Earliest settlement occurred closer to the Minnesota River and so the older structures are in the area of first European contact. The Joseph Vogel house, Henry Teich house, and August Vogel/Teich house discussed in this survey were among the earliest brick structures built outside of established towns. Therefore, it seems appropriate to look to the house structures in Chaska and Carver for basic forms which were modified at the later farmsteads. Prototypical structures which anticipate some later properties of farmhouses include the stone school at St. Nicholas' Church on top of the Carver hill ,.(a fairly faithful Quaker plan; Fig. 7.1), the well-documented "Carver Cottages" in U'll I e vage of Carver (Fig. 7.2), and the early houses built by operators of the brickyards. M A second reason the brick farmhouses were built later than brick structures in town, was the priority given to improving the land and securing the homestead claim or land purchase. It is not surprising to find that the first habitations of early settlers were modest log cabins. Several such preemption cabins survive on the farmsteads where brick houses were later built. However, most immigrants within the period of 1870- 1900 seem to have arrived with financial resources sufficient to allow construction of a permanent family home and barn almost at once. (In fact, most of the land in Carver County seems to have been conveyed by the federal government to private landholders prior to the Homestead Act of 1862.) The Joseph Vogel house is well-documented by local historians as one of the earliest houses built, and was one of three properties settled early -on by the Vogel siblings. This brick house is extremely simple in its earliest form, and it shows clear evidence of several subsequent additions. Based on the generally random placement of windows and the crudeness in the details of assembly, it was dearly erected by builders without a strong background in masonry construction. Because the brick material predates the earliest commercial kilns in Chaska, it must be presumed that the brick was fired by the scove-kiln process; that is, without benefit of a kiln structure, but rather fired in the open. Contemporary with the brick Vogel house is the stone masonry August Vogel house now owned by David Teich (Fig. 7.3). It exhibits much of the same formality and symmetrical four -bay fenestration as many of the stone houses built nearer the Minnesota River, particularly toward the Ottawa Village Historic Site and in the area of the former Louisville settlement across the river from Carver to the south. The outward form of the August Vogel house is also very similar to an early parochial school adjacent to St. Nicholas Catholic Church in Carver. The August Vogel house suggests (and anticipates) the two-story portions of later farmhouses identified as a "Quaker" plan and similarities in form between stone masonry and brick masonry structures of this date are significant. The kitchen ell is constructed entirely of Chaska brick (suggesting a later date) and window openings are squared -off with brick in the tooled -stone formal part of the house. A Chaska -brick granary structure exists intact southeast of the house. .E A house identified as the "Carver Cottage" in the Carver -0n -the -Minnesota Historical Survey represents the most elemental "L" -plan which was repeated in endless variations throughout the county. It is composed of a story -and -a -half element with an expressed ell which forms the entry. Within the village of Carver are two other examples of the diminuitive Carver Cottage"L"; the Hanson house and "Dikeside" house (see Fig. 7.3). Several houses included within the survey set are also identified here as prototypical of a strain of houses which followed from them. The reader is directed to illustrations of the Henry Teich house (#03; c. 1866) as an example of early construction technology. The Jacob Schlicker house 077) and the Harvey Rietz house (#28; Fig. 7.4) each date from about 1866 and show the evolution of farmhouse "L" plans in phases. F.W. Wolter house of 1874 040) is believed to be the earliest Type 3 structure (Figs. 7.6 and 7.7). The final models which will be pointed to as sources for the farmhouse forms around the county are the brickyard operator's residences at the early Brinkhaus Yard (later the Klein Brick Co.), built in about 1866 and now adjoining the public swimming beach on the north side of U.S. Highway #212117 The one toward the west is a three -bay, center -chimney I -house with its original entrance in the middle bay. (The current entrance has been relocated to the gable end.) A kitchen ell has been removed to the west of the two-story part of the house that survives today. Expressed brick pilasters continue to the height of an original east -facing porch (now removed). A second house from about the same date exists just to the east. This thesis will not conclusively prove that these prototypical structures were necessarily the earliest dated houses, nor that they represent watersheds in the thinking of the housebuilders. However, because of their locations and the dating information which is available for them, they seem to anticipate formal characteristics of farmhouses which were built in outlying parts of the county during 117 (The swimming area itself was formed by the excavation of brick clay, as were two other man-made lakes within modern Chaska.] 65 -,; the more prosperous 1870s and'80s. Examples on the following pages will group farmhouses according to common characteristics in a roughly chronological sequence. Groupings correspond to five typologies proposed in this Chapter. Additionally, the masterlist which identifies house locations in Appendix A attempts to identify each house according to its type, following the same system. B. Groul2ing Carver County farmhouses according to planimetric and volumetric bT s. Based on field measurements, sketched plans, and elevations of a selected group of the Carver County brick farmhouses, we can group them in terms of room arrangement (which reflects usage) and formal expression (including patterns of fenestration). Most of the brick farmhouses dating from the period of my study can be placed within one of five typological classifications. Four out of those five will be discussed in some detail here since they consistently follow from the same three-room plan tradition. The fifth "type" is the innovative American Foursquare or "Combelt cube" which superceded the traditional "L" or "T" plans near the end of the period of this study. While the fifth case has not been extensively illustrated in this thesis, I will discuss it briefly as evidence of changed circumstances in the cultural landscape.118 I hope to demonstrate, then, that the other four brick house types follow from German farmhouse traditions 119 Examples of each type also appear among the case studies which follow in this Chapter. The recognizable types are120. 1) Type 1: Basic three-room organization (such as the early Vogel house; Fig. 7.10); variously of center -chimney or gable -chimney form. Often this type does not read as an "L" when later alterations have been negated. It may be symmetrical or asymmetrical, but the fenestration is generally more random than planned. The arrangement of rooms varies widely in this "catch-all" category. This group also includes I -houses and various elemental three-room planforms which do not fit the 118 [For purposes of comparison, I will rely on two articles which discuss the Foursquare that dominated after 1900.] Patricia Poore. "The American Foursquare';Old Hose Jcumal, pp. 29.31; and Thomas Hanchett, "The Four Square House Type in the United States' in Wells Perspectives in Vernacular Arch itecture.v.1; pp. 51-3. 119 [It is only fair to acknowledge that these characteristics are not exclusive to the German farmhouse, but may occur within other ethnic traditions as well.] 120 The term "Type" in bold letters, followed by a number, is used hereafter to identify five groupings discussed here. More precisely, the first three groupings are subtypes which share common origins and may all be placed within a single type distinct from the crosshouse and the foursquare. 66 Til other classes of compound forms, but may represent points of departure for other types. 2) Type 2: A plan type recalling the flurkuchenhaus concept and deriving from the basic "Carver Cottage" (Fig. 7.3). The Wendelin Grimm house (Fig. 7.17) is consummately of this type. In the completed form of this house type, the kitchen ell dominates the approach side. The two-story element tends to be a two -over -two plan with three -bay fenestration, but this type also includes other window configurations, particularly in the gable ends. In many cases, summerkitchen/ pantry dependencies were added to the basic Quaker -plan footprint, and often the original uses of rooms have been changed to segregate the kitchen from other spaces of the house (as is the case in the Poppitz House). 3) Type 3 houses appear larger in their final form than Type 2 houses, but in many instances, they, too, seem to have been built in phases. The usual sequence would be construction of a story -and -a -half kitchen with loft, followed by a two-story transept. The addition (which served as formal parlor and sleeping rooms) typically conformed to the double -pile Georgian ideal. Often the only part of the house with full basement is the earliest -built, kitchen element (e.g.; Kroells/ZumBerge house; Fig. 7.30). Other examples may well have been built in a single phase of construction, but maintain the same expression of various parts. A tendency of this class over time was the relocation of chimneys from the end gables to a more central location. Furthermore, this variant constitutes what linguists term "backforming"; that is, if it was not truly constructed in phases, it is unconsciously made to seem so. In most of the Type 3 houses the Georgian element dominates or displays a formal "presentation" side which contradicts the daily usage. 4) Type 4: The fourth variety of cross -plan houses occurs later than the other examples. These houses show evidence in their size and ornamentation of greater economic resources. Again, the increasing tendency of chimneys toward the center anticipates the emerging foursquare plan. Type 4 is transitional from the three- room plan with clearly expressed interior functions toward the centralized Foursquare. (Molnau/Barinsky house is characteristic of this type; Fig. 7.36.) 5) Type 5: The Foursquare (also identified in the Middle West as the "Cornbelt Cube"; Fig. 7.42) comprises the fifth category. It is approximately square in plan with four similar elevations and consists of four bedrooms above four main floor rooms with a central chimney. No direct connection with German house -building traditions can be demonstrated, although there is some incidental correspondence with Type 4 arrangements. Aw B.6 Chanhassen and Chaska Township and Municipalities; Carver County. Minnesota (15 Chaska Brick farmhouses noted.) to the rest owly begin. rhe farther e, the soon - we reach ilopment in Iger die of human be- sess in his _say that In ance to transport the charmthg Gfager to the theater.' . P. S.—She theater., It. DID YOU JCNOWV j That all announcers of the British Broadcasting. Company are - Oxford men !They believe their accent to be the -purest English. That out of the 2,000 applicants w bo tried out for jobs as announcers- at the Nation Broadcasting studios �o- cently, only one got a job? He 4 a the elevator boy Id the building. That in England they call to e" "bulbs T- Th4t Bob (Believe It Or Not- Rip ey, says, I the man who went safely o er Niaora Falls in a barrel was,i an over4b7 an automobile three -.'Years ago? i AUGUST VOGEL SN DENLY PASSES 4T 67 (First Ward Reiident, Former Agricul- -' 'turaliat, Sick For Only Aft�r being around among his many lrlen s and relatives on. Wednesday, August Vogel was seized '}tuft a sud- den illness at his First ward home that evening about ten 'o'clock and passed Into the eternal sleep the noon of the following- day. Friday. His brief 'period of illness and the ani noun ement of his passing were unbe, livab to those who had. been near him only so shortly before and, to whom he was a friend,. kind -and time. August Vogel was born on Vogel's hill on the first day of June of the year 1863, residing for some time on that.pomeatead in Chanhassen towu- ship. He was married tpppPI Mary Van Spon the ninth of Fe time , 1892, an t en resided for some time at Sha- kope Hi later life was spent tin the farm, having moved to this city only. tour yearn ago from a rural home in Lake - town lltownship. During the years of their I married ppompanionship Mr. and Mrs. Vogel reared a fine family of tell children: Edward, nowofChaska, Clarence Pierson, Chaska, Mrs. :e Koehnen. Victoria, Dorothy, Ppee, Anges, George, 'Martin and garde, Chaska, Frances, St. Paul, august Jr., Chaska, "I They have eepest sympathy in theirunre- Is loss of a friend ,that 'meant to them since the 'days of their The! funeral serviced were' held from the Guardian Angel's Catholic church Monday morning, !the solemn requiem high mass being chanted. Members of the St. Peter's society, of this'city, and the St. Joseph's society, of Victoria, of which the deceased was a fellowmember, attended the ser- vice in a body. Pall -bearers, Leonard bircks, Joseph Schindler, Henry Stans, Mike Muelkens, JohnBaer and William Jaspers, bore the body to its final place of rest in beautiful Guar- dian .Angels' cemetery, overlooking the city which meant so much to Au- gust Vogel in life, where his friends and loved ones he left.behind are to real worth. I' ' Theon tof-town relatives and friends' included: Mr. and, Mrs, Paul Vogel and daughter, Mr. and Mrs. Jahn lArtzmelorl and family, Mr. and Mrs. Max Vogel - and family, Mrs. Alex Voget,'Mrj and Mrs. Charles Tr., Mr. Iss Mrs. Charles Theta and MJerry Pass, Mr. and Mrs. Heniy De, all of Shakopee, Mr. and Mrs.old Vogel, of near New Market, Margaret Vogel, Miss Antoinette' Hoen, of Minneapo- ,is,-Gust Krons¢hnabel, of 'Frederick,! South Dakota,I*onard and Miss Ag- nes Meier, Mr. And Mrs. Wm. Worm, of Maple Lake. Mr. and Mrs. Joe Joos, Mr♦3. G. E. Gastler, of SL Paul,_Miss Anna E. Sloan, of Excelsior, Mr. and Mrs: John !Arle, Joseph Weiser, M} -'and Mrs. Flank Walser, Mr. and 11¢fs. Joe Knott; Mr. and Mrs. Clar- ence Knott, of Norwood. Mr. and Mrs. Peter Van Slo4n, Raymond K{elzer, Mrs. Wm. Dircks, Mrs. Walterlung, of, Waconia, Mr and Mrs. Theo Wil- lems and aughter, Mrs. Ed. Aretz and son, Mrs. Mike Knotz, Leonard Vos Sr.,%Mr. and Mrs. Hubert Van Sloun and dau ter,- Mr9. Val Haas- ken: o: Le4 Mr. and Mrs. (Gilbert Schuman. ofW5nsted, Mr. and Mrs. Joe Logelin, Mrs. Joe Kobman, Mrs. John Kohman, Mr. and Mrs .Lawn ence Eder; John Eder, Mrs. Julia Craig, of St. Bontfacius, Ferdinand Breher and daughters, Mr. and MrS. Jos. Schneider, Mr, and Mrs. Leonard you Sloun, and members of the St. Joseibb'o Soctetn of Victoria, and oth- Card o1! Appreciation We cannot express our appreciation Sully ',enough to',those kind oneswho tendered us-atI and sympathy at a time of sorrow.; We want to express our thanks to *a choir, priests, poll - bearers, St. Peter and St. Joseph societies, those', who offered spiritual and floral bouquets and their cars, and everyone—who was so kind. —Mrs. August Vogel anti ;gamily. Rumour ui Luc w, was uawva uv -- by deputy sheriffs and that it belong- sd to me, which 1s not, tare. I am a candidate for Congress, in the 10th .Congressional1?fatrlct and I feel that you owe tome a correction of the sta} menta made in your paper in regard, to this incident. I have quite a, her of acquaintances In Carver count nd bleo In Hennepin county, where un nbtedly you pop - or is cUculated. In all fairness wish to ask you to snake arr ' coect on of this statement contain jil in t is ar- ticle. These two meni were of In that vicinity on any business o mine and .without my knowledge or sanc- tion. I trust that you have bee eta - informed as to the,facts In th case and that you had no intentto print anything wbich� was not 'true a r gard to me. However; the fa t mains that thesestatementsa u true and are very .damaging t m both in my business, and in m poi tical campaign, and I wleh to r nest you to publish this letter - in cq*- spfcuous place in - your, next a Won or write another article in re d to ,the matter, clarifying the situotion. Yours, truly, s ERLING -SWENSON. MQLNAU•MILLER NUPTIAL CEREMONY WAS 'PERFORMED As a surprise to the people of this community, relatives , and friends, came the announcen�eht of the mar- riage of Mrs. Elizabeth Molue , reel - dent of a.farm northeast of cfty, to Elmer C. Miller, formerlr- Of Dan- ville, nlluois,'and-Minneapolis, which took place at. St Johh's theran church Thursday at 12:30 p.6 m. Rev. Otto Kohn .performed the ,ceremony in the presence of the couple and Mrs. Otto Kohn and H. F. Ehlers, attend- ants. An 'appropriate vocal selection was rendered by Miss Gertrude Fhlen. - Following the ceremony a chicken dinner was served the newly -married parties The event was then an - IN THE MAIL -BAB Weekly Valley) Herald,'. Chaska, Minnesota. Gentlemen: A copy of yo: paper, 'The Weekly' Valley Herald published June 12. 1930, came into my handy today and I'was quite surprised to find that you imd an article; on the front page of your paper connecting me with a man named -Corneaby who engaged in a. tight last Friday' at an oil station to Excelsior, and -in the course which brawl a map named Henry Wallin was killed. i In your papier you .Aay t �t Mr.' Corneaby ' was: campaigning or me. Jf he was campaigning for mi it was without my. knowledge. Yoi know, as a matter of fact, that ingreat. many instances campaign carte come Into the hands; of a great number of persons without the knowledge of the candidate and for the conduct of which persons!, the candidate cannot be blamed and your statement In the Paper that Corneaby was campaigntpg for me is absolutely wrong: You.allso U brad acgi we wjsl hap THE;, VALUE of s craftsmanship is . the first twenty - service emphasizes I operation and up -1 Oi est fig e� zl(wq 00, CP y C,6&ws w L tlpp cheap, to mase rouui iur c@lebra. Sial , UV S SEE, for ga ino to ( h} 414rivals. Ynw is your chance sale , i . b r!l tv tslle n ice and ,rbains at lbegt M n'� iu+' hi�1 brother withip. enty r' Hours' r the Schmidt, Tltits & Mere s.- i ) uk;I a it: ro Na ar own on alipenr ,cetff id'noticq o .Frank rge Ebinner left for. Brai d;I was tb "dwner f JAY SEE Ive i , rids}, i :b sl' sat "th :court u here.Ile Will 0 P.rl` a slr use.: All iert,fo d Yiri e o make_ p niers and ill he rice id for t Q o sa Ct•u a role ant Call acid to r shop George is A . o d the ho a was i :0,0"0. D. gj Frank S workman find Y now ba ihe;flfi glece',rtf o seflesh nverll otj r� c,>mlrlue £br fr2• Al- T? P in the a�e . b f is'. n If the lf;adi�t� lyu n�iinen s here hb a lie will Ccee n }[ y� w venture as be is a de§e vi g I o that t� q. roan, , .field: �Jfiss. i> i.0 trret a>�rl ra. ish: wtSgfolksan old Ifolke" I egofS . P ',+seri th g�ea's fthe `•oGrL--VAx oQir— t 1 e(.t} i�iieses ab last eea elel�ll-C1dP o, Ecelsl�ir n lic l hat ;`Cl�¢¢Ia T day evening +kAf ` partaki d 1t 9ti, i p` r Victor (3 'tier'sJfi mppe nt supper�erveri . at t e ,iugust q e iatnd ifs§ f1f 'y np t iit� � is t•e�Ini-I v 5. an fiend is n o�lse, t;he par Ire urri Van 9T til Re .Il ii i 'r �' K a tottple� li.vs�lo i ;Ca&ill cutin I ' y moonlig t'arri 'n abq t 11 I . i ht. Abselge frr, om p e ted ' tolbe t otc` P ul,i wa iromlnit tlJgtdt itbo'e eit:`� _ e 4isltiti w r Lkn 1 tan fi}tni1 ei't KUnZe ImH rent ,. th G c nttgetttl ups are 3 1 tth, i ]first it e6 I, Pp form in Lal: t ,i vp rablh known n thit s (4i� ,e 'er . jo Mitt $�.fits of the 1}oYe upon the ee rlv_'u c�. the Gr tm being sti tf crinia X10 3 ill,a ntcaring. He will tlsp run Is iTAugtis pgej uld etf r�pf;(It nkYe wish A bert sucee. s a d er at our u, ou ` 3 y. �1Vear risen while t brioh is; is d+ lb pleased to 1 stu t. ae i tends; t e will succe an mi}kilt lotsr of' ofinrd in Sloan he 0 ep 91i build a tc o i�t1c+�tl T r nr: trey, debt p pop As eq_a of (�h} n ; l>tasen I� `Cess \1:1 tt r l r'r;teia, an old itiP.J.iniI sri.er ` , I'1'he stat. #tends. I Young Pete` 1`r term rt .I tau. Iwt,gl tlt citizen of this e! as 'if _ - c a la tis s c e Is for', tureha two v un friegir f opt tlrsday andFiidap i ?tris y p ( P P R werek#nit Me ri n r Na iFt-rm o ere and else e t r In fs , 1 Ito y, hnr p s 11 ke" a�nf a rr i f h. liar bngh pro eta or., ti- firs' uu , e of ich 1' s Ter ea Toe Sc;l Jra arl ti 1"-* s .eesa. dieId A ;lies. o in Wit,ph � u P-, alders tw tt 1 f .) tid—�n7j. I tlklp Fri a. Ce�br. 13t �, & verc her ad t 1 my )Vattte t �1 oney a d t'aeti om tli 'trying @v ip e ; m dir. e: [' I I 1 ra �er iia a 1>idy niav Sep adv: t�set#' the '. pa's! t�t-tri.e qu L of beald cl; d sic use of ,vq �tro le is I'll le,I Ati t1 n x ,p� 1 lythe Cdnrc. re l nd w s gr ,t6 ',iloved a Ali d ?vet' �at0 9Cb, oT k one 13 , ceive� of t C ., fo • ,¢ ,.t>Ily d friend lb Ayer's .Shm parr?} -.at• On e't , . ut�iosq o �n np a tin n and . alt k ' �ti fr a (toll Ii be aUi 6 Of Cur T ' ke a 4irs of tl,e nt ei, t ke },is m rho hnfo .I n t lie itv u y n f C[lli t nt10 O 8 1 TlCO Who t.`' - I was a eude ,� s t.. I• _ re iui'1 ill t n` fi �n to he neLessity o; teFe w i81 it Vel irate tID a t- t o ptrl r iii o'* >?C0'.'in?v? tell of the Gra dj rmt . st h t it l' k Dleei i I 1 e itli i u file jo`ar +9 xy fe i+a; Tharsdi y vening. The, 'n iv a i . -�� e ' e i fb ed that .11, ler, oq'jile, as 1' iaa Olin ubt proply- .erselect t Ile lul,y iustlille8, if t lfe t a ulgr' '1 t4 aw llijeaol wtiieh that i rP sonle pleas n$ i " ' rte eeGbe . be bo RT + wL IL, Y'P 1C V rayl } b;! P r �li b u u ell fyi'I I r. f4 O. olvnerEar. , uLl, but s ill nom how t� t►t oe ear. n fl l surxu �r the tuu h solve tt ek f Iri i'i� Cti, e ar ,tl reset .C. ?best -Mille of :l� :icoui❑ ,tfir J F was tk l d Y P + sch of Ln,k t wnpulled our 'la h Chris in ea i 17s,hert�y i n ,, ;all t se in "'an Ba ,a d p an'i Alberi s ily , r, h tier n farm �tAv'e j h ed to t t 'rind 1 ov a 1.1 nii rat.„d' that lie had �ome iin lr- eylmp th of e�coral u tt ..int si ttli t}tffe� r CCI lts t tr . >ei'bre GtI�Ir-/ �� The Voflywood girls are keeping he son Delano&essmakers busy the past we k. day Mrs. James Toole returned home a a months stay with friends in Minnea her lis. stay Wanted -To know i ne orresp 'Ars. dent to a paper in a to is n t an ci ent? ' ie_ Mrs. Rap, Mrs. R. 1. arks I and ,aby Anderson were calling n friends h r la- this week. Miss Lena and WaIH4 ager of Wa eve- town, spent,a week in llywood ' 'f has ing friends., buy, J. F. Kelly anf ,M % heresa McH dricks took a flying til to Cha§ka ail". dav-last.wleek. .t it Math Seton and PeWO'Neil ret ' e ittle I home from Graceville after a shot[ Q welcome b¢ys. day Miss Mall gie KLIV�d Jobn' L < that will be.in Pe lit. on fSlit. 24th, t 1 ays. Catholic c urch at.vvatertown. ;sin. j . For sale, A pe4 coon, ( all on or add very Hern;an E gel The buyer must oon.. buy 4 pal' of b ckskia ;loves to prid vi°g. his hhnds. mit- ;. a Wanted To know why "the ollywoo co espond jut to ;the i. ' inHterests h mself so mach in other of the to ? Wsp We have a correIo so st yin ouk yard. died It T, �TIVION ictlor 'lack Frosty m7hisvisitto�neighborhood last.�crGael Larson aned° .the C. Hurtigfamy.' four Aug. Burling and Papa Sanquist, m, Idest an overland trip to Watertown one c old. last week Co., Jos. Schug of Benton, is making 8th ,home at present with his brotbgrt-1 .rs, 2 Alfred Sanquist. - f his Adolph Rachel called on Ed: Adahms wa, last Sunday forenoon and Ed., reta n here the complimept•in the afternoon.' le be- The Leivermann Bros., of C as -ioorted around 4ere last St ndaj. IT, the are good shots, but found game a Er- The majority of our farmers were lar' busy in the middle of the week, to t re in is the Carver Fair. They will make the for this by atte°ding the Chaska uta leap 400 .. I t-- ,,.. -. ck Bicycle "ra, 5.00 ,I t Coatun Gent" osVy lot rize or and Illuminati n and a "l pair,$ . a � do ate , . A. h id adbdc awardm privea .. 7.CO ,i 2ndrpri ambrar et;e Iris pi d nated by F. oun�. ' el wouderfel ek horse '' I - iris at Grand Stand...... 8.00 t Costain Lad oa eat lst priz tc ntomir shov`, , Ledegar, , let set va a $5, on by A. . M ei no at Ura d Stand ..,..... --.8,80 gad prize Fram pf tura of ttl h: SA TI DAY,SEPT. j. Maine d natpd "y Burkhart s. 1 ntSaoue $and Concerts day �. oat comics ,Cha 'eter ou Wh 1 1 H Id evening by Marie and donated y Sim ae 7b Vo¢el. lity Bands..... Ragamn Ba d.1si Prize 1 a` B C 'ck Bicycle Riders. .... 10.00 a. cicaredo b Hugo Hoe n. = Fire Works, at (]rand 2ud prize 1 b ti pple� do by'] d ;.. ..... 10.30 , Melvin. h �"? P ine shov. !Ledegar j Best ecora Fina Appaxatne 1 boa B 'o at Grand Stand ..... 11.00 do ted by Jo Sntkei er: r e wonderful tick horse - ririe at (#rand , , .... ,11.30 ,: F Auto bile i5. ►pv ding of Pr min s at od vie of parade and all o . Rr htbition Hall ..:.. ....:. 12. noon Stand t Park. L D eath A p. Vo b1. ra taken Up. Came into y osure a yo s 'e 9ngust Vogel, one of a old b ck, da or, a n August 2 , and most esteemed pione 'r settler The owner a oufd me forwa of is county; digg� at h a beaut propd' pa ;Charges a d fultome on Vogelis, ill, Chanhas same away. g sena on Sundaly, Sept• 1 b; 1901). Ch of 1 ng troubles. For Sale. r. V., had been a ck for about16atter the town of Eden Pr two months prior to' s death,. 2� ilea em t of E*celmor,; 3 dt' es but,his condition w derred tb anion Eden Prairie, n, senpus until within a bn�le df ° hOu� S°dd barn, good ell w prior to his d th. He was ec' der cultivation, 6 ofiig o m ow land, balance in in all respectf} one ou beak citi- tare 9 w ded. zen and his -death ca univer, ��t1ao. t b all spring in sal orrow. s/almild rbnl ol. e will publish an obi ary For tktitta dd P.O. 'box �6 call atplatt east ce#sior, 36 r,pweek, not having th data at os. IB. HAR hal to write, one this w ek. II heriff's Sale. - I By Owe an Execution Iwo The S . .tar's Sot t�[. thq District rt in and for the our; Caa�rc•er and S to of Minnesotg, FrEdericks. ei wad p�tt{iff. and . The St. Pct eneficiarp of and was efeadant w}lich ez h this 1111 ty,.elec e t their 1 't meeeing d' and eBveFed+o me for six d agates a resent the 'ety at Gave tevied u e real estate h is described, an I sell the acme t p the nnual m of the pa society auction, to th l;igbest bidder, for tae to be held at u b, comms g next frost door oHouse, in f ,Court the Perin of Chaska fn' ever County'afo a1� Monday and g y, The Saturday the enty-second day of Sepp delegates are as f lows: i becl A. D. 1 , at ten' o clock m e f� I Lsoxeaa ST rs, noon r that y: The real to being described � fo LRbsdRn DtR i �sonth'on half of lot four (4)' d- B• L ARD D iota five and, (5,A 6) of block elyr Benton city'"( Os Tillage) Carves Com PETER STACK Mianeecfia, s sling to the rectirded'l Jonn WvDrss. _ - thereof fil in-theoffice of the Deeds i a an ; or maid Carver Coun I , FA ED Ess. Dated A 8th 9(p A IIST 7p 3JN of Carter County, lax ltfp4ug9 A vertise, sR in �hd HAio � '� N N t3, n U v NS VOGEL. At his home in Chanhassen tl�Sunday; Sept.. 16,-1900,- of phthisis, .pulmonaris, AugustVogel, at the, age of sixty eight years,' YY'^mdntbs, and' 26 days. '',Another old settler, zespccted and es, teemed by all who knew him, has fallen. by the wayside, and as" the - Sbakopee Argus says: "It needed nothing more than the very large attendance at the funeral ser- vice's, which took place at - St. - Mark's church on yesterday morning, to make fully manifest how deep was the feeling ofregard.held for him by the people a- mongwliom fie"pad lived ana mo§ect-for ;ngply half'a C4ntdry: A,'"gpod vsaii ba'§ gone to hisreew' aro' I" - " ` ' August Vogel was born in Meister - burg, province of Schlesing„ flermany,. on the 21st dap of September. 'Su the year. 1831. In 1846 be emigrated to A- merica, landing in New' York. Here he lived during -the followingyear,-and then went to Iowa, and later to the St. Croix river, in: which vicinity be`lived tivo years. He settled is Shakopee when there was but one white man tiding there, and that man was . Thomas Holmes, the fonader of that city. In'52 he took a claim is Hennepin county,now Carver county, ,situated two miles hoith of Shakopee;: and. there he lived througboutthe,remainder of his .days. In 1858 he was married to Miss . Bary Krouschnable, who died March 6, 1875. Eight children blessed this union, and Ave of these survive. , Four. pears after the death of his first wife Mr. Vogel wns united in marrage to Miss Mathilda Otto who with seven children, mourns bis loss. The five -children by the .first marriage are all married. Thev are Mrs, Carrie;,Nii'chtsb6im: bf Shakopee; Aujhst Vtrge'1{.4444 stacMrs..Tberesia Christianson, of Minneapolis; Frank Vogel, of St. Paul; and -Mrs Anna Mo- der, of Minneapolis. -bile brother, jos. of Shakopee, also survives him. 7 CARD of THAxss., Mrs. August Vogel and . children de- siteto express their heartfelt' thanks, to the friends and neighbors whose many acts of kindness did so much.to lighten t.hei; sorrow and care- during the sick- nessanddeath of their busband'and fattier. nuaDmluLiv +Prus�+a Born 26 Mar 1792 Placeu Ohlauth Schlesien 1dife Chr. 27 Mar 1792 Place Miro sterbern Sc lie &L Ware 1. Mar 2 Mar 1824 Place Kamig, Schlesien, Prussia EF+rnincr.: 2. Died Place S,tk. or Miiuon Bur. Place HUSOANO'S HUSBAND'S FATHER Amand Joseph Franz VOGEL MOTHER, Tleresia nRRTFT I; HUSEANO'S DTH.rA WIVES Ij WIFE Maria Theresia KLEINEIDAM u Kammg, ester, Prussia -� Born Place n li Chr. JulPlace Died Place Bur.— Place Osep DAM Hedwige BONISCH --1I' WIFE'S FATHER —WITHER WIFE'S OTHER HUSBANDS WHEN DIED SEX CHILDREN WHEN BORN WHERE BORN GATE OF FIRST MARRIAGE _ _ _ _ _ _ nm' it M LIs. each chill lwhe,h,, Im".1 or U..d) in meer of bath. MONTH YEAR TOWN COUNTY STATE nH e,UNTnv TO WHIM I, F Olven Nnmes SURNAME DAY _---___--fir --- M Joseph VOGEL 25 Mar 1825 Ohlguth Scliesifn Prs — F There 19 Jan 1827 - - - - - - -� M Franz 17 Sep 1828 - - - - - - - -^ 4 M on 1 Se 183 0it It to t M August " 20 Sep 1832 " ---_----- G F Anna 23 Jul 1835 " " - - - - - - - - - L 7jM Johannes 20 NOV 1838 " -------- _ I B ----- - -r H 10 I --- ----- -. -.-------------- `— — — — — SOURCES OF INFORMATION OTHER MARRIAGES j Miin sterberg Cat IDlic Pari sh Regi ster h Kanrdg R R rl i CHANHASSEN A Centennial History Daniel John Hoisington City of Chanhassen 16 CHANHASSEN: A CENTENNIAL HISTORY productive mines, its immense products, both of vegetable and animal kingdom, a portion of which he has never before seen; its countless cities and villages, where flourish industry, commerce, and wealth. The Vogel family landed at Yorkville in 1852. They came from Silesia, a province in eastern Germany that is now part of Poland. Jo- seph Vogel was born on October 18, 1824 in Ohlguth near Munsterberg. There is some question whether the Vogels lived in America for a time before they came to Carver County but the family took up the first claim in June 1852 on the bluffs to the north of Yorkville. The Vogels were squatters with no legal claim to the land. In fact, the 1851 treaties did not become official until February 24, 1853. just to the northwest, other Germans gathered around a lake. Al- though an early Minnesota historian, John Stevens, referred to them as a "colony," they each came as family groups. Since these families all came from Bavaria, many began to refer to the lake by that name. The Kessler family—widow Barbara and six children, Heinrich, Franz, Michael, Joseph, Veronica, and Victoria—lived in a small vil- lage in Bavaria. With little opportunity to acquire farms for each of the four sons, they followed the reports about America. Several of the Kesslers' friends, namely Engelbert Schneider, Michael Ess and his sons John and Joseph, had already left for the new land and sent back glowing reports from Cincinnati, Ohio. The K mlers decided to emi- grate, selling their home and their property to pay for passage. The Kesslers stopped in Cincinnati. At the time, the town on the Obio Rivet was heavily Germanic and had -become the central gather- ing point for new immigrants. German language newspapers carried the latest reports from the territories. Cincinnati had been settled, though, for many years and all cheap land had been taken. Their friends, the Schneiders and the Ess's, had taken up farms in Michigan. The Kesslers decided to head to the new "Sulands" of Minnesota. Traveling to Saint Paul via the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers, they ar- rived in the region in July of 1852. The four sons, Joseph, Heinrich, Franz, and Michael filed claims on the lake. A family descendant states that the Kesslers built a large log house on Heinrich's claim near the northwest corner of the lake and lived there as they built other homes. Tobias Ottinger arrived on May 10th, 1852.Ottinger had lived in America for several years, apparently working as a huckster for a time in Missouri and other southern states. He came from Saint Paul, load- ing his wagon with cooking utensils, stove, plow, some tools, and sev- eral months' food supply. It took him about a week to travel the thirty-five miles from Saint Paul to his homestead with his oxen. Engelbert Schneider decided to join the Kesslers in Minnesota. Schneider was born in Bavaria in 1830. Some accounts suggest that he August Vogel Mathilda Vogel Above: Franz and Magdalena Vogel Right: Alexander Rachel and his wife, Anna Vogel Rachel. Their farm is now part of Hazeltine Golf Course. CHANHASSEN: A CENTENNIAL HISTORY 17 came to America as early as 1847. He lived near Freedom, Michigan for several years where he married Anna Maurus. We know little about Anna's story although records state that she was born in Regensburg, Bavaria. In 1855, they came to Chanhassen, settling on the east side of Lake Bavaria. Michael Ess and his sons Joseph and John came with the Schneiders. On July 15, 1854 Joseph Vogel married Veronica Kessler at the Kessler farm in Laketown—the first wedding in Carver County. Fa- ther Augustine Ravoux, a missionary, performed the ceremony. The couple had three children. Joseph and Veronica built a home, now the Bluff Creek Inn, in 1864 on land deeded to "Luther C. Clark, Musi- cian" as warrant deed for service in the War of 1812. At the same time, August built a fine house of Chaska brick around the area now known as Vogel's Hill. Anton, John, Frank, Theresa and Anna settled nearby. Anna married Alexander Rachel, living on his claim near Lake Hazeltine. Family tradition says that Theresa moved west after mar- riage. John disappears from the records. German immigrants settled in other parts of the township as well. Benedict Schmid claimed land on the northwest of Lake Minne- washta.-Schmid had -visited Minnesota where his brother Joseph claimed land in 1857. Benedict returned to Cincinnati to live for a year, apparently to earn enough money for his own claim. Schmid wanted to find a wife to share life on the frontier. "I don't know how long I'm going to stay here," he wrote on June 14, 1857, "but before I go back to Minneapolis, I would like to take a wife." He Two Vogel brothers built homes near each other. Top: August Vogel's home is located on Hwy, 101. Below: Joseph and Veronica Vogel's home, built in 1864, is a now the Bluff Creek Inn. CHANHASSEN: A CENTENNIAL HISTORY 19 The land was bound to attract many more people. A government surveyor recorded his impressions of the township in his field survey notes: The land in this township is generally first-rate. As there is a great variety in the kinds of land lying contiguous, it is a very de- sirable place for farmers. Many of the settlers now in it have in their farms as much opening as they want for tillage, a sufficient quantity of timber and a large amount of excellent meadow while lakes, springs, and brooks everywhere abound. Many claims have valuable tamarack swamps on them. A young minister in Belchertown, Massachusetts had read similar reports and talked with his friends about the prospects of settling in Minnesota. C11111-)—, 1-)—, Q '-�.. fl �z� Tracingancestr Y Vogel sisters find information on area's first settlers By Claire Robling Tracing a family's history can be a long, tedious job, but for Claire and Anne Vogel, whose ancestors were the first white settlers in Chanhassen, it has been an ad- venture. "At one time in my life I was simply bored whenever the subject was discussed, but I've really come to appreciate whatever information I can get now," said Claire Vogel, Who can recite names and dates of Vogels and their births, deaths and marriages. Through information gleaned from other relatives, newspaper accounts and historical books, the Vogels have put together what they believe is a fairly accurate account of how their relatives came to settle in Chanhassen during the early 1850s. Although Joseph Vogel is the most commonly mentioned of their relatives, having been the first person to stake a claim in Chanhassen in June 1852, the two sisters who are retired say that -five Vogel brothers. and two sisters ac- tually left their parents in Germany, where they lived near Silisia, (it became a part of Poland after World War II) and came to the United States, with most of them eventually yettling in Chanhassen Township during the 1850s. The siblings stayed close together as they married and homesteaded and eventually had title to much of the land east and west of what is now Highway 101 near the steep hill. The area was actually referred to as Vogelsburg or Vogel's Hill by some area residents, a name that was given to a small housing :^development located on the Nil (Vogelsburg Circle). While Joseph Vogel became active in township government, married a neighbor, Veronica Kessler, for the ;first wedding among white settlers in the county, and built a large house An 1864 that now serves as the Bluff ' Creek Inn, a bed and breakfast 'establishment owned and operated by Marge Bush on Bluff Creek Road, his brothers and sisters were also busy developing their homesteads. Frank Vogel, the great grand- father of Claire and Anne, settled on 160 acres in the area where Bluff :,Creek Golf Course is located today on Creekwood Street. Claire and Anne, as well as a dozen other residents, now have homes on the fringe of this homestead. August Vogel lived on a farm sacross from Halla Nursery that was .the former home of Roy Teich, and 'Anton Vogel lived on a farm on ,Pioneer Trail (Co. Rd. 14), just west of Highway 101. He reportedly died young after suffering from a rup- .tured appendix, but he and his wife had four children. Another brother, John, was more difficult to trace, as was a sister, Theresa, who repor- tedly married a Sohn and moved out west. The second sister, Anna, married Alexander Rachel and they also farmed in the area. "We've heard a number of stories about these early settlers and we're keeping track of as many of them as Bluff Creek Inn Is the former residence of Joseph and Veronica Vogel. The home was built in the 1860s by the Vogels, who are said to be the first white couple married in Carver County. possible so they don't simply get lost," said Claire, who her sister says is the family historian. For example, Claire recounts a story she heard that Veronica (Kessler) Vogel would frequently get Indian visitors whenever she baked bread and the aroma drifted out of the family's large brick home. She reportedly gave some of the bread to . the visitors, partly out of fear, but also to develop friendship. The Vogels had a reputation for being friends of the Indians and were therefore not too intimidated when rumors of the Sioux uprising spread throughout the area. While many settlers quickly packed some of their belongings and traveled to Fort Snelling for shelter, the Vogels stayed in their homes and planned to hide in their cornfields if the Indian warriors begaqto approach, but the group was stopped before it got near. Along with information, the Vogel sisters also have collected as many photographs of their relatives as possible, as well as items they once owned. These are kept in their home in what they jokingly refer to as their family museum. "Some people have recreation rooms in their basements. We have a museum," said Claire, with Anne adding that even though the items they have collected are not valuable antiques, "they are all important to us because they belonged to members of our family." The information they have collected, however, could be valuable , to historians and in- teresting to current residents who live on the original homesteads of the Vogels. "Not everyone is interested in this type of history, but it seems that as you get older, you appreciate it more. It's been a fun project for us," said Claire. Veronica and Joseph Vogel. Pictures of Frank and Magdelina Vogel hang in the "family museum" belonging to Claire and Anne Vogel. ni-Orief 119 We.( F S A (7 CC 7 GENERAL NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT ALL WORK, USING HIS BEST SKILL AND ATTENTION. HE SHALL BE SOLEY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, PROCEDURES AND SEQUENCES FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE TO REVIEW THE SCOPE OF WORK AND EXISTING JOB SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL SERVICE, AND OVERALL COORDINATION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING HIS BID. ANY DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS OR OMISSIONS, ETC. SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL AREAS FROM DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY DAMAGE TO NEW AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION, STRUCTURE, OR EQUIPMENT, SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE TENANT OR BUILDING OWNER, OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR, AND SHALL REPLACE OR REMEDY, ANY FAULTY, IMPROPER, OR INFERIOR MATERIALS OR WORKMANSHIP OR ANY DAMAGE WHICH SHALL APPEAR WITHIN ONE YEAR AFTER THE COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL RUBBISH AND WASTE MATERIALS ON A REGULAR BASIS, AND SHALL EXERCISE STRICT CONTROL OVER JOB CLEANING THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING FINAL CLEAN-UP UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. ALL AREAS ARE TO BE LEFT IN A BROOM CLEAN CONDITION AT THE END OF EACH DAY. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAFEGUARD THE OWNER'S PROPERTY DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL REPLACE ANY DAMAGED PROPERTY OF THE OWNER TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR BETTER. 8. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, WHETHER SHOWN HEREIN OR NOT, AND TO PROTECT THEM FROM DAMAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR ALL EXPENSES FOR REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF UTILITIES OR OTHER PROPERTY DAMAGED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE EXECUTION OF WORK. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COMPLETE SECURITY OF THE SITE WHILE THE JOB IS IN PROGRESS AND UNTIL THE JOB IS COMPLETED PER U.B.C. 10. ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE U.B.C. AND ALL OTHER GOVERNING CODES, ALONG WITH THE GOVERNING RESTRICTIVE CODES. 11, THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL CODE REGULATIONS AND STATE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL REGULATIONS AND DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY (OSHA) REQUIREMENTS. REFER TO THE CODES SECTION OF THIS SHEET. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ANY PERMITS, LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS NECESSARY FOR PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK AND INCLUDE THOSE IN THE COST OF THE WORK TO THE OWNER. 13. FIGURED DIMENSIONS HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER DRAWING SCALE, AND DETAIL DRAWINGS HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER SMALL SCALE DRAWINGS. CHECK ACCURACY OF ALL DIMENSIONS IN THE FIELD. UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED, DO NOT FABRICATE ANY MATERIALS OFF-SITE, OR PERFORM ANY CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE ACCURACY OF DRAWING DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN VERIFIED AGAINST ACTUAL FIELD DIMENSIONS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES WITHIN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO EXECUTING THE WORK IN QUESTION. EV DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 1 11/11/071 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION 4 SCOPE OF SUPPLY 14 3 2 VICINITY MAP PIONEER HALLA GOLF COURSE T -MOBILE SITE A1P902 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. CHANHASSEN, MN PROJECT DATA PROJECT AREA: INTERIOR LEASE SPACE: EXTERIOR LEASE SPACE: 15 FT X 35 FT PARCEL AREA: 4 tbmmunhy Devetopme DepL ZONING TYPE: 1 PROJECT TEAM 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF DETAILS ARE ` THE FOLLOWING TABLE DELINEATES THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF DIFFERENT PARTIES INVOLVED IN COMPLETING THIS PROJECT. ITEM FURNISHED BY CONSIDERED UNSOUND, UNSAFE, NOT WATERPROOF, OR NOT ` THE SITE SPECIFIC SCOPE OF WORK WILL PRECEDE ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND ON THIS SCOPE OF SUPPLY. CONTRACTOR IMPROVEMENTS OWNER WITHIN CUSTOMARY TRADE PRACTICE. IF WORK IS PERFORMED, CONTRACTOR BTS PLATFORM T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR T -MOBILE IT WILL BE ASSUMED THAT THERE IS NO OBJECTION TO THE XLL� RAW LAND SITE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR UIC (POWER/TELCO) T -MOBILE C/O VOICESTREAM WIRELESS CORP DETAIL. DETAILS ARE INTENDED TO SHOW THE END RESULT OF T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR BBU CABINET T -MOBILE CO -LOCATION SITE BBU CABINET 12920 SE, 38th STREET THE DESIGN. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART BTS CABINETS T -MOBILE IMPLEMENTATION BTS CABINETS T -MOBILE IMPLEMENTATION BELLEVUE, WA. 98006 OF THE WORK. 16. EXISTING ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS TO BE JOINED SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. IF THEY DIFFER FROM THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER SUCH THAT ONS CAN BE MADE BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK 17. ALL SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS USED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THEIR EXACT MEANING, THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED FOR CLARIFICATIONS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK. 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY BLOCKING, BACKING, FRAMING, HANGERS OR OTHER SUPPORT FOR ALL OTHER ITEMS REQUIRING THE SAME. 19. CITY APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE KEPT IN A PLAN BOX AND SHALL NOT BE USED BY WORKMEN. ALL CONSTRUCTION SETS ITEM FURNISHED BY INSTALLED BY ITEM FURNISHED BY INSTALLED BY SITE OWNER DON HALLA 6601 EDINA, MN WK ARCHITECT/ENGINEER TOWER T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR BTS PLATFORM T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR BTS PLATFORM T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR BTS PLATFORM FOUNDATION CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR TOWER & BTS PLATFORM FOUNDATION CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR UIC (POWER/TELCO) T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR UIC (POWER/TELCO) T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR BBU CABINET T -MOBILE IMPLEMENTATION BBU CABINET T -MOBILE IMPLEMENTATION BTS CABINETS T -MOBILE IMPLEMENTATION BTS CABINETS T -MOBILE IMPLEMENTATION ANTENNA T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR ANTENNA T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR COAX CABLE T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR T -MOBILE - MINNEAPOLIS 8000 WEST 78th STREET ESUITE DINA, 00 55439 COAX CABLE T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR JUMPER CABLES T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR JUMPER CABLES T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR LNA (LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER) T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR LNA (LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER) T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR GROUNDING KITS FOR COAX T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR GROUNDING KITS FOR COAX T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR SITE GROUNDING MATERIALS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR SITE GROUNDING MATERIALS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE & BRACKET T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFLECT SAME INFORMATION. '!'.' CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR UNDERGROUND WORK CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR _ UNDERGROUND WORK ZONING QUESTIONS & NOTIFICATIONS ALSO MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION, 0!• COMPLETE SET OF ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE & BRACKET T -MOBILE ABBREVIATIONS CONTRACTOR WAVEGUIDE BRIDGE (EQPT TO TWR) T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR T -MOBILE - MINNEAPOLIS PLANS WITH ALL REVISIONS, ADDENDA ANO CHANGE ORDERS WAVEGUIDE BRIDGE (EQPT TO TWR) T -MOBILE METER CONTRACTOR WAVEGUIDE LADDER ;TOWER) T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR 8000 WEST 78th STREET ON THE PREMISE AT ALL TIMES- THESE ARE TO BE UNDER THE KVA DIM. UIC (POWER/TELCO) T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR UIC (POWER/TELCO) T -MOBILE 400 DWG. CARE OF THE JOB SUPERINTENDENT. WAVEGUIDE LADDER (TOWER) T -MOBILE BBU CABINET CONTRACTOR FENCE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR ESUITE DINA, 55439 CODES AND STANDARDS ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST ADOPTED EDITION OF THE FOLLOWING PUBLICATIONS: 1. ASTM (AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS) 2. ACI (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) 3. AISC (AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION) 4. AWS (AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY) 5. UBC (UNIFORM BUILDING CODE) 6. MOOT (MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION) 7. ANSI (AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE) 8. IEEE (INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS) 9. NEC (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 10. NEMA (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION) 11. NESC (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL SAFETY COMMISSION) 12. OSHA (OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTHY ADMINISTRATION) 13. UL (UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC.) 14. APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES LEGEND DETAIL NUMBER DETAIL DRAWING ON WHICH ORIGINAL DETAIL WAS DRAWN BLANK DENOTES DETAIL IS ON SAME DRAWING SECTION LETTER SECTION DRAWING ON WHICH ORIGINAL SECTION WAS DRAWN BLANK DENOTES SECTION IS ON SAME DRAWING CHK APPROVED RF FN OP INSTALL REFERENCE DRAWINGS RAR ( Q G1�i S� SURVEYOR EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK 7415 WAYZATA BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55426 ELECTRICAL TI TI S XCEL ENERGY C11V OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JAN 1 9 2001 QIAI*t 3SM PLANNING DEFT BENCH MARK: 928 FEET BASIS OF BEARING: COORDINATES (ANTENNA LOCATION LATITUDE: 44'-49'-17.2" LONGITUDE: 93'-32'-23.6" ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: SITE DIRECTIONS SITE DIRECTIONS: N TELEPHONE UTILITIES FROM 1-494 & 1-35W, GO WEST ON 1-494 FOR 5 MILES TO HWY 212; GO a QWEST WEST ON HWY 212 FOR 3 MILES TO CR 1; TURN RIGHT AND GO WEST FOR 5 MILES TO HWY 101 (GREAT PLAINS BLVD.); TURN LEFT ONTO HWY 101 AND GO SOUTH FOR 1/4 MILE TO CREEKWOOD DRIVE; TURN RIGHT AND GO n WEST TO FIRST ROAD ON THE RIGHT; SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET NORTH OF CREEKWOOD DRIVE. 0 s CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL FENCE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR UNDERGROUND WORK CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR _ UNDERGROUND WORK CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR SITEWORK CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR ABBREVIATIONS SITEWORK CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR POWER DISCONNECT & METER BOX CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR POWER DISCONNECT & METER BOX CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR METER UTILITY UTILITY ARCH. ARCHITECT A AMPERE OR AMMETER BLDG. BUILDING AF CIRCUIT BREAKER AMP FRAME(R) METER UTILITY UTILITY T-MOBILECONTRACTOR KVA DIM. • T • •Mobile• MINNEAPOLIS MARKET CATCH BASIN AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR CENTER LINE A/G ABOVE GROUND C. B. C.L. CLG. ATS WATER TOWER SITE CONCRETE ROOFTOP SITE CONC. CONST. ITEM FURNISHED BY INSTALLED BY ITEM FURNISHED BY INSTALLED BY CONTR. DET. BTS PLATFORM T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR ROOFTOP PLATFORM T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR DIA. DIAG. BTS PLATFORM FOUNDATION CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR ROOFTOP ANTENNA SLED/ATTACHMENT T-MOBILECONTRACTOR KVA DIM. UIC (POWER/TELCO) T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR UIC (POWER/TELCO) T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR DWG. BBU CABINET T -MOBILE IMPLEMENTATION BBU CABINET T -MOBILE IMPLEMENTATION EA. ELEC. BTS CABINETS T -MOBILE IMPLEMENTATION BTS CABINETS T -MOBILE IMPLEMENTATION EL. EQUIP. ANTENNA T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR ANTENNA T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR EXIST. COAX CABLE T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR COAX CABLE T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR FTG. GA. JUMPER CABLES T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR JUMPER CABLES T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR GALV. GND. LNA (LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER) T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR LNA (LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER) T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR H. M. GROUNDING KITS FOR COAX T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR GROUNDING KITS FOR COAX T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR L. F. MTL. SITE GROUNDING MATERIALS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR SITE GROUNDING MATERIALS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR MIN. MISC. ANTENNA ATTACHEMENTS (TOWER) T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE & BRACKET T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR N.T.S. ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE & BRACKET T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR ROOFTOP COAX ATTACHMENTS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR O.C. PL. WAVEGUIDE BRIDGE (EQPT TO TWR) T -MOBILE CONTRACTORUNDERGROUND WORK CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR REQ'D. S. F. COAX ATTACHEMENTS (TOWER) T -MOBILE CONTRACTOR SITEWORK CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR S.S. FENCE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTORSIM. POWER DISCONNECT & METER BOX CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR SPECS. UNDERGROUND WORK CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR METER UTILITY UTILITY STD. STL. SITEWORK CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR STRUCT POWER DISCONNECT & METER BOX CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR T.C. T.O.P. METER UTILITY UTILITY TYP. T.O.S. T/ B/ • T • •Mobile• MINNEAPOLIS MARKET CATCH BASIN AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR CENTER LINE A/G ABOVE GROUND CEILING ATS AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH CONCRETE AIC AMPERE INTERRUPTING CAPACITY CONSTRUCTION CB CIRCUIT BREAKER CONTRACTOR CKT CIRCUIT DETAIL CU COPPER DIAMETER GEN GENERATOR DIAGONAL GFI GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTER DIMENSION JB JUNCTION BOX DOWN KVA KILOVOLT AMPERE(S) DRAWING KW KILOWATT(S) EACH M METER ELECTRICAL MTS MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH ELEVATION NF NON-FUSED EQUIPMENT N.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACT EXISTING PNL PANEL FOOTING PH PHASE GAUGE PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE GALVANIZED RCPT RECEPTACLE GROUND RGS RIGID GALVANIZED STELL HOLLOW METAL SW SWITCH LINEAL FEET SYM SYMMETRICAL METAL TEL TELEPHONE MINIMUM XFMR TRANSFORMER MISCELLANEOUS TYP TYPICAL NOT TO SCALE U/G UNDERGROUND ON CENTER V VOLT PLATE W WATTS OR WIRE REQUIRED WP WEATHERPROOF SQUARE FEET WHM WATTHOUR METER STAINLESS STEEL UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SIMILAR SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD STEEL STRUCTURAL TOP OF CURB TOP OF PAVING TYPICAL TOP OF SLAB TOP OF BOTTOM OF PROJECT NO. I hereby certify that this plan specification, or report NOTICE: THIS DRAWING HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED AND was prepared by me or under my direct supervision IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF T -MOBILE - MINNEAPOLIS and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer DESIGNED BY MARKET AND IS LENT TO THE BORROWER FOR THEIR under the laws of the State of Minnesota. C. MILLER CONFIDENTIAL USE ONLY, AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE LOAN OF THIS DRAWING, THE BORROWER PROMISES CHECKED BY AND AGREES TO RETURN IT UPON REQUEST AND AGREES THAT IT WILL NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED, LENT OR Typed ar MICHAEL HACHEY /tel OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, NOR Prkrw ma^ APPROVED BY USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN WHICH IT IS FURNISHED. j 7 Dalt / � / -U / Reg. No.: 17852 cuENrLt4 TWIN CITIES AREA 651-454-0002 MN. TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 DRAWING INDEX Al P902 -T1 . . . . . PROJECT INFORMATION AND GENERAL NOTES A1P902-C1 . . . . . SITE PLAN Al P902 -C2 . . . . . ENLARGED SITE PLAN Al P902 -C3 . . . . . LANDSCAPING PLAN Al P902 -C4 . . . . . EROSION AND GRADING PLAN Al P902 -A1 . . . . . ANTENNA INFORMATION AND TOWER ELEVATION Al P902 -E1 . . . . . POWER AND GROUNDING PLAN STANDARD DRAWINGS: STANDARD - AIS (1) - STANDARD GEN 2 & GEN 3 EQUIPMENT CABINETS PLAN & ELEVATION VIEWS STANDARD - A2S (1) - STANDARD PERCELL EQUIPMENT CABINET PLAN & ELEVATION VIEWS STANDARD - A3S (1) - STANDARD SITE IMPROVEMENT SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD - A4S (1) - FENCING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD - A5S (1) - FENCING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD - EIS (1) - STANDARD ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD - E2S (1) - STANDARD ANTENNA & COAX GROUNDING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD - E3S (1) - STANDARD ANTENNA COAX INSTALLATION STANDARD E 41; (1) SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD EQUIPMENT BIJ16DING WIRING STANDARD STANDARD - ESS N1S (1) (1) STANDAR6 GROUNDING SPEGIFIGA�RGNS FOR -GUYED-TOWERS- - STANDARD ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL NOTES STANDARD - N2S (1) - STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL NOTES SHEET 1 STANDARD - N3S (1) - STANDARD CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL NOTES SHEET 2 STANDARD - SIS (1) - STANDARD EQUIPMENT PLATFORM FOUNDATION PLAN, SECTIONS, AND DETAILS STANDARD - S2S (1) - STANDARD EQUIPMENT PLATFORM SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD - S3S (1) - STANDARD EQUIPMENT PLATFORM EXTENSION, S:I�APIBARB 646 (1) WAVEGUIDE BRIDGE SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD ANTENNA & GGAJ( MOUNTING SPEGIFIGArTIONS FGR F6UTED WATER TOWER STANDARD - SBS (1) I= - STANDARD ANTENNA AND COAX CABLE INSTALLATION STANDARD S78 (1) SPECIFICATIONS STAP&AIRD T*PIGAL EQUIPMENT BUILDING PLAN VIEW HALLA NURSERY DA" Al P902 11/s/os DATE PROJECT INFO. & GENERAL NOTES 7/1 DATE 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA DATE SCALE DRAWING NUMBER REV w O 8 1 7 EV I DATE I REVISION DESCRIPTION "CHK APPROVED 1 11/11/071 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION WR z I Z J LJ aLJ OI a z z_ � IX W I 0 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE I I II I I EXISTING WOODED AREA I 5 HALLA 'NURSERY EXISTING GRAVEL AREA FUTURE CINGULAR LEASE AREA 932.3x T—MOBILE CLASS 5 GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD (QW/VEHICLE TURNARUND 9308x 931.5x T—MOBILE 20'-0" WIDE %" Y I �� x92a3 ACCESS & UTILITY�EASEMENT �� \ 4 3 2/ \ 0Q Q1j \ / `EXISTING WOODED �— AREA D x932 x931.7 0 7, x931.7 x931.6 T—MOBILE 15' X 35' Uo LEASE AREA I O ;. • r r % x926.2 � i 7 i ,kyzv. U x925.5 U'ry ,0" MSN" 924.7 X930' . , i 72 i 1�j0 3 ��912-7-= i x9334 931.9x t, � r i I I I 931.2x; I � x9333 I I \ I I 1\6\, x9332 � I 31.�x x9333 19 928.7x:�`;i:932.1 ; x9334 I ` I `\N� xty 4 9 92a3+ �:�i 1 6 9 \\ `� xx931. I I T—MOBI(E 15 OZ. GEOTECH_ \\\ FABRIC BARRIER 929.4-J, J, RF I FN I OP IINSTALL I REFERENCE DRAWINGS I 929.8x, 929.4x , 1 � X932.9, x9333 / x9337 I 933.2x I 9374 x9325 I EXISTING BITUMINOUS I DRIVEWAY `-931 9M.8x I e9.32.9 7, I 929.4x -� r r I I k , rg Ir • T • •Mobileim MINNEAPOLIS MARKET SCALE: 1" = 60'-0" x928.6 I PROPOSED 16'-0" WIDE 1" MESH GATE PODJW'T No. I hereby certify that this plan specification, or report NOTICE: THIS DRAWING HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED AND was prepared by me or under my direct supervision IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF T—MOBILE — MINNEAPOLIS and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer DESIGNED BY MARKET AND IS LENT TO THE BORROWER FOR THEIR under the laws of the State of Minnesota. C. MILLER CONFIDENTIAL USE ONLY, AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE LOAN OF THIS DRAWING, THE BORROWER PROMISES CHECKED BY AND AGREES TO RETURN IT UPON REQUEST AND AGREES THAT IT WILL NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED, LENT OR Tryad °f MICHAEL HACHEY OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, NOR �� Ppb �^ APPROVED BY USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN WHICH IT IS FURNISHED. Dab: �� - / % ' G % Rap. No.: 17852 euENr APPRW E 11/6/06 DATE 111714 7 DATE /-/7 ---Z�;7 my 1 HALLA NURSERY Al P902 SITE PLAN 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SCALE DRAWING NUMBER AS NOTED Al P902 -Cl W J U z a a W U W W N N P x .3 i x9259 N G jz x925.2 Z z ; x9279 T -MOBILE 145'-0" 9yb/� x ; MONOPOLE / / o 2x i / x928.5 i i x926.8 ' --------- x925.2 `--__ O 9i r i x927.2 `� '--� x928.4 h.6x c x928.8 x927.3 x9275 x9256 ' s EXISTING y� _ WOODED -- _ `92y\ x92a6 AREA l x932.2 3 ��912-7-= i x9334 931.9x t, � r i I I I 931.2x; I � x9333 I I \ I I 1\6\, x9332 � I 31.�x x9333 19 928.7x:�`;i:932.1 ; x9334 I ` I `\N� xty 4 9 92a3+ �:�i 1 6 9 \\ `� xx931. I I T—MOBI(E 15 OZ. GEOTECH_ \\\ FABRIC BARRIER 929.4-J, J, RF I FN I OP IINSTALL I REFERENCE DRAWINGS I 929.8x, 929.4x , 1 � X932.9, x9333 / x9337 I 933.2x I 9374 x9325 I EXISTING BITUMINOUS I DRIVEWAY `-931 9M.8x I e9.32.9 7, I 929.4x -� r r I I k , rg Ir • T • •Mobileim MINNEAPOLIS MARKET SCALE: 1" = 60'-0" x928.6 I PROPOSED 16'-0" WIDE 1" MESH GATE PODJW'T No. I hereby certify that this plan specification, or report NOTICE: THIS DRAWING HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED AND was prepared by me or under my direct supervision IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF T—MOBILE — MINNEAPOLIS and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer DESIGNED BY MARKET AND IS LENT TO THE BORROWER FOR THEIR under the laws of the State of Minnesota. C. MILLER CONFIDENTIAL USE ONLY, AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE LOAN OF THIS DRAWING, THE BORROWER PROMISES CHECKED BY AND AGREES TO RETURN IT UPON REQUEST AND AGREES THAT IT WILL NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED, LENT OR Tryad °f MICHAEL HACHEY OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, NOR �� Ppb �^ APPROVED BY USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN WHICH IT IS FURNISHED. Dab: �� - / % ' G % Rap. No.: 17852 euENr APPRW E 11/6/06 DATE 111714 7 DATE /-/7 ---Z�;7 my 1 HALLA NURSERY Al P902 SITE PLAN 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SCALE DRAWING NUMBER AS NOTED Al P902 -Cl W J U z a a W U W W N N e VA P El 3 REV DATE I REVISION DESCRIPTION 1 1/11/07 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION RAR APPROVED I RF FN 1 OP IINSTALL I REFERENCE DRAWINGS T • •Mobile me MINNEAPOLIS MARKET NOTICE: THIS DRAWING HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED AND IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF T—MOBILE — MINNEAPOLIS MARKET AND IS LENT TO THE BORROWER FOR THEIR CONFIDENTIAL USE ONLY, AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE LOAN OF THIS DRAWING, THE BORROWER PROMISES AND AGREES TO RETURN IT UPON REQUEST AND AGREES THAT ff WILL NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED, LENT OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, NOR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN WHICH IT IS FURNISHED. aol. l — ✓ 7 17852 " L Rp. No.: I CIJENF 1 r n HALLA NURSERY = U DATE Al P902 11/6/06 ENLARGED SITE PLAN DATE DATE 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. /,/7 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA W U ^ DATE SCALE DRAWING NUMBER REV W U As NOTED Al P902 -C2 1 o PROJECT NO. I hereby certify that this plan specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer DESIGNED BY under the laws of the State of Minnesota. C. MILLER CHECKED BY / Typed� r MICHAEL HACHEY signature: ATIOVED BY aol. l — ✓ 7 17852 " L Rp. No.: I CIJENF 1 r n HALLA NURSERY = U DATE Al P902 11/6/06 ENLARGED SITE PLAN DATE DATE 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. /,/7 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA W U ^ DATE SCALE DRAWING NUMBER REV W U As NOTED Al P902 -C2 1 o 8 I 7 ( 6 DECIDUOUS LA ... z v N 8'-0" STEEL STAKE T—MOBILE 6' HIGH BLACK CHAINLINK FENCE w/(3) STRANDS BARB WIRE T—MOBILE 145'-0' MONOPOLE r— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 I I I I FUTURE CINGULAR I LEASE AREA � I I I I I -------------------I TREES QTY COMMON NAME SIZE NOTE: REMARKS A TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6' TREE STAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED. STRAIGHT LEADER DESIGNED W IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION OVER NOTES. RESPECT STATED DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF TO STAKE TREES, HOWEVER, THE rii HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTES SHRUBS TO SIT ON SUBGRADE MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE NO PLANTING TO BE INSTALLED UNTIL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. MULCH — 4" DEEP SHREDDED BARK GUARANTEE PERIOD. 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL LOCATIONS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY ? HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. AND ALL DIGGING. A 3. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS, OR ANY DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE — OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT MATERIAL ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL, OR GUARANTEE, 4" P.V.C. EDGING 3' ® 120' INTERVALS (TYP.) THEY SHALL BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. REFER TO PLAN FOR GROUND 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE COVER POLYRTHYLENE (40 MIL, 1-1/2" ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. SUBGRADE WIDE STRAP TYP.) ALL PLANT TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. CENTERING OF SHRUB IN BED TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH ONE SHRUB PER TYPE AND SIZE IN EACH PLANTING BED AND EVERY TREE SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED (COMMON OR TO TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER MULCH — 4" DEEP SHREDDED BARK LATIN NOMENCLATURE) WITH A PLASTIC TAG WHICH SHALL NOT BE REMOVED PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ROOTBALL TO SIT ON SUBGRADE FLAGGING — ONE PER WIRE 7. PLANTING SOIL — SEE SPEC. TOPSOIL w it 2" x 2" x 24" WOOD STAKE SET > ANGLE SOD ■ J T—MOBILE CLASS 5 GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD & VEHICLE TURNAROUND AREA i X LANDSCAPING PLAN SCALE: 1/8"=l'—O" CONIFEROUS TREES NOTES: CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED IT IS CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES, HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. REV DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION CHK �' n APPROVED RF FN OP INSTALL REFERENCE DRAWINGS 1 1/11/07 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION RAR 4 (8) BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (6' TALL AT TIME OF PLANTING) (PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR) T—MOBILE EQUIPMENT PLATFORM w/EQUIPMENT CABINETS T—MOBILE 8 OZ. H WEED BARRIER FABRIC AND LANDSCAPE ROCK DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE — 3' ® 120' INTERVALS (TYP.) 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYRTHYLENE (40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP TYP.) 8'-0" STEEL STAKE FLAGGING — ONE PER WIRE MULCH — 4" DEEP SHREDDED BARK ROOTBALL TO SIT ON SUBGRADE PLANTING SOIL — SEE SPEC. SOD TOPSOIL 2" x 2" x 24" WOOD STAKE SET AT ANGLE SUBGRADE 3 2 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiPLANT SCHEDULE 1 CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITIES AREA 651-454-0002 MN. TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 CODE QTY COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS A 8 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6' B&B STRAIGHT LEADER DESIGNED W DATE OVER NOTES. RESPECT STATED DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF LANDSCAPING PLAN rii HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiPLANTING NOTES SHRUBS TO SIT ON SUBGRADE 1. NO PLANTING TO BE INSTALLED UNTIL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. MULCH — 4" DEEP SHREDDED BARK 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiLANDSCAPE NOTES 1. REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR DIMENSIONS AND SITE DATA. 2. REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR GRADES, EROSION CONTROL, AND RESTORATION OF GRADED AREAS. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiGENERAL NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS ON PROPERTY WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (651-454-0002) PRIOR TO STAKING PLANT LOCATIONS. 2 COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. 3. WHERE EXISTING TREES AND/OR SIGNIFICANT SHRUBS MASSINGS ARE FOUND ON SITE, WHETHER SHOWN ON THE DRAWING OR NOT, THEY SHALL BE PROTECTED AND SAVED UNLESS NOTED TO BE REMOVED AND/OR ARE IN AN AREA TO BE GRADED, ANY QUESTION REGARDING WHETHER PLANT MATERIAL SHOULD REMAIN OR NOT SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL. 4. ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN TO BE FERTILIZED AND PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD WOOD AND DAMAGED OR RUBBING BRANCHES. 5. BB TREES AND SHRUBS ARE BALLED AND BURLAPED. 6. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR QUOTATION. 7. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON—GOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION. 10. WARRENTY FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPETION OF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE NEIN PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE WITH ALL REPLACEMENTS TO BE PROVIDED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 12. AREA OF DISTURBANCE FOR SEEDING SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED AT CONCLUSION OF CONSTRUCTION. 13. SEED SHALL BE APPLIED AT 3LBS/1000 S.F. AND IMPREGNATED INTO THE SOIL AND COVERED WITH A STRAW MULCH. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiPLANTING SPECIFICATIONS 1. PLANTING BED PEPERATION: ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS SHAL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 10". AMENDMENTS SHALL BE APPLIED AFTER CULTIVATION. 2. BACKFILL SOIL: USE SOIL EXCAVATED FROM PLANTING HOLES AND PROVIDE AMENDMENTS. REMOVE ALL DEBRIS INCLUDING ROCKS LARGER THAN 3" DIAMETER. 3. FERTILIZATION: ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONE MEAL OR OTHER SPECIFIED FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 4. MULCH MATERIAL: AS SPECIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. MASS MULCH ALL PLANTING BEDS TO 3" DEPTH OVER FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER WITH NO FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. ALL EVERGREEN AND DECIDUOUS TREES TO RECEIVE 6" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. 5. TREE STAKING: IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO STAKE AND/OR GUY THE TREES ACCORDING TO THE DETAILS. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO TAKE EVERY STEP NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN THE TREES AND SHRUBS IN AN UPRIGHT AND PLUMB CONDITION AT ALL TIMES UNTIL THE END OF THE PLANT GUARANTEE PERIOD ESPECIALLY WHERE VANDALISM, SOIL OR WIND CONDITIONS ARE A PROBLEM. S H R U B 6. TREE WRAPPING: WRAPPING MATERIALS SHALL BE QUALITY, HEAVY WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR R� THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12-1 AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER 5-1. 15" (MIN) • T MEMO b*Ile •o MINNEAPOLIS MARKET NOTICE: THIS DRAWING HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED AND IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF T—MOBILE — MINNEAPOLIS MARKET AND IS LENT TO THE BORROWER FOR THEIR CONFIDENTIAL USE ONLY, AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE LOAN OF THIS DRAWING, THE BORROWER PROMISES AND AGREES TO RETURN IT UPON REQUEST AND AGREES THAT IT WILL NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED, LENT OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, NOR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN WHICH IT IS FURNISHED. I hereby certify that this plan specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Tr or MICHAEL HACHEY yynutti: � PrlrrM Nary: / _ /% w 7 17852 Daft � ! , Rap. No.: M 0 PROJECT NO. 7. RODENT PROTECTION: PROVIDE ON ALL TREES, EXCEPT SPRUCE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. NOTE: HALLA NURSERY HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF 8. PLANTING PLAN: ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED CAREFULLY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PLAN TAKES CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL (TYP) UN = PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE DESIGNED W DATE OVER NOTES. RESPECT STATED DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF LANDSCAPING PLAN rii HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiPLANTING NOTES SHRUBS TO SIT ON SUBGRADE 1. NO PLANTING TO BE INSTALLED UNTIL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. MULCH — 4" DEEP SHREDDED BARK 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL LOCATIONS MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY LANDSCAPE FABRIC — SEE SPECS. APPROVED BY AND ALL DIGGING. PLANTING SOIL — SEE SPECS. 3. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS, OR ANY /—/7 —07 OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT MATERIAL ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL, OR GUARANTEE, 4" P.V.C. EDGING 0 k /1 THEY SHALL BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. REFER TO PLAN FOR GROUND 4. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE COVER ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. SUBGRADE 5. ALL PLANT TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. CENTERING OF SHRUB IN BED 6. ONE SHRUB PER TYPE AND SIZE IN EACH PLANTING BED AND EVERY TREE SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED (COMMON OR TO TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER LATIN NOMENCLATURE) WITH A PLASTIC TAG WHICH SHALL NOT BE REMOVED PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE. DIMENSION FROM EDGE. 7. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PRPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. NOTICE: THIS DRAWING HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED AND IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF T—MOBILE — MINNEAPOLIS MARKET AND IS LENT TO THE BORROWER FOR THEIR CONFIDENTIAL USE ONLY, AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE LOAN OF THIS DRAWING, THE BORROWER PROMISES AND AGREES TO RETURN IT UPON REQUEST AND AGREES THAT IT WILL NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED, LENT OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, NOR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN WHICH IT IS FURNISHED. I hereby certify that this plan specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Tr or MICHAEL HACHEY yynutti: � PrlrrM Nary: / _ /% w 7 17852 Daft � ! , Rap. No.: M 0 PROJECT NO. HALLA NURSERY Al P902 UN = o DESIGNED W DATE C. MILLER „/s/os LANDSCAPING PLAN rii 0 CHECKED BY DATE 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. APPROVED BY DATE CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 0 /—/7 —07 m 0 k /1 CLIENT APPWVAC DATE SCALE DRAWING NUMBER REV AS NOTED Al P902 -C3 1 4 ({�/\I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 10 1O M 1 I Im I I 1 I M I � 1 g 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 M I I I 1 1 I 1 CEXISTING WOODED AREA CONSTRUCT ENTRANCE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY PERMITS NEW T -MOBILE 16'-0" WIDE GATE T -MOBILE CLASS 5 GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD w/VEHICLE TURNAROUND CLEAR AND GRUB IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2101 (MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF EXISTING VEGETATION) CEXISTING WOODED AREA 0 �7 � k0011 PROPERTY LINE ____ __ ________________________________ EXISTING PRIVATE DRIVE %-G \OGS \ o \ \ \ \ \ z 20' DRIVE z J W 10 10 W En fA .3• W a py l t �M }� 22 J� 36 31 qk� CL. 5 AGGREGATE FOR 9 TON DESIGN. CONFIRM IN FIELD W/ SOIL ENGINEER & ADJUST GRAVEL THICKNESS AS REQUIRED. APPROVED SUBGRADE GRAVEL DRIVE SECTION F— �7 CITE' MI A u 5 N SCALE: 1/32"=l' -O" 'I DATE I REVISION DESCRIPTION �'V'ry APPROVED I RF I FN I OP (INSTALL REFERENCE DRAWINGS CHK 11/11/071 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION RAR GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD & VEHICLE TURNAROUND AREA (SEE GRAVEL DRIVE SECTION) 4 GRADE TOWER SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2105 SILT FENCE Cb(` (SEE TYPICAL SILT — / � FENCE DETAIL) l\ v SEE ENLARGED SITE PLAN ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" • T • •Mobile MINNEAPOLIS MARKET 3 FJ / CLEAR AND GRUB IN ACCORDANCE / WITH MNDOT 2101 (MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF EXISTING VEGETATION) / ` EXISTING WOODED AREA T -MOBILE 145'-0' MONOPOLE T -MOBILE EQUIPMENT PLATFORM w/EQUIPMENT CABINETS 1N CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING GOPHER STATE ONE CALI TWIN CITIES AREA 651-454-0002 MN. TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT— (OPTIONAL) METAL OR WOOD POST OR STAKE ENGINEERING FABRIC FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH BACKFILL WITH TAMPED NATURAL SOL DIRECTIETINOil` RUTJ� .. ..:.,..__. B INCH .MINIMUM NOTE: DEPENDING UPON CONFIGURATION, ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MESH WITH HOG RINGS, STEEL POSTS WITH TIE WIRES, OR WOOD POSTS WITH STAPLES TYPICAL INSTALLATION FOR SILT FENCE (SECTION 6.3, MPCA'S -BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES') NOTICE: THIS DRAWING HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED AND IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF T–MOBILE – MINNEAPOLIS MARKET AND IS LENT TO THE BORROWER FOR THEIR CONFIDENTIAL USE ONLY, AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE LOAN OF THIS DRAWING, THE BORROWER PROMISES AND AGREES TO RETURN IT UPON REQUEST AND AGREES THAT IT WILL NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED, LENT OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, NOR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN WHICH IT IS FURNISHED. 2 1 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTES 1. GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES CALLED FCR ON THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, WHICH MAY INCLUDE SILT FENCE, SEDIMENTATION BASINS OR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS. SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND SERVICEABLE IN THE FOLLOWNG ORDER: A. CK ROCONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES A MINIMUM OF 50 FEET. B_ SILT FENCE. G, TEMPORARY CULVERTS. D. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND OUTFALL FACILITIES, E STORM WATER POND CONSTRUCTION, F. COMMON EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT (GRADING } G. SEED AND MULCH OR SOD. H. BID–ROLL BARRIERS IN FINISHED GRADED AREAS. L INLET AND OUTLET FACILITIES SUBSEQUENT TO STORM SEWER WORK. 3 GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY AND NPOES PHASE II PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS EROSION CDNTRDL ME ES AS MAY BE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS_ GRADIPNG CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ANY ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY. 4, ALL EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING CRADIIG OPERATIONS, ANY TEMPORARY FACILITIES WHICH ARE TO BE REMOVED AS CALLED FOR ON 11 -ESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE REMOVEO BY THE GRADING CONTRACTOR W4IETJ DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL THEN RESTORE THE SUBSEQUENTLY DISTURBED AREA IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 5. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE THE SOILS ENGINEER SO THAT CERTIFICATION OF ALL CONTROLLED FILLS WALL BE FURNISHED TO THE OWNER DURING AND UPON COO,MPETIOJ CP THE PROJECT.y�p �� 6. ALL SHA KE COVERED NTHT A MNMUM �4` � TtTPASOIL AL SPECIFICALLY E IFIICALLYTURBED DESIGREASNED BYL LANDSC BE SEEDED & MULCHED AT THE PRESCRIBED RATES WITHIN 72 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, SEED MULCH X TYPE 1 MNDOT N0. 508 2 7OJSRACRE (DISK ANCHORED] FERTILIZER: 15D//ACRE RATE OrAPPUCATION 20–t0-18 ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A CONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE WITHIN 20D LINEAL FEET OF ANY SURFACE WATER, MUST HAW TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVER FOR THE EXPOSED SOL AREAS YEAR ROUND, ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING TABLE OF SLOPES AND TIME FRAMES. TYPE OF SLOPE IIIAL (Mexhum time on area can remain open when the area is not nouvely being worked) STEEPER THAN 3!1 7 DAYS 1011 TO 3:1 14 DAYS FLATTER THAN 10:1 21 DAYS 7. THE EXISTIP40 TOPOGRAPHY 010 CONTOUR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WERE TAKEN FROM A PLAN FURNISHED BY OWNER 8, CONTRACTORS GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL OPERATIONS SHALL TAKE PLACE WMTHN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. S. IT IS REQUIRED THAT SOLS TRACKED FROM THE SITE BY MOTOR VEHICLES BE CLEANED DAILY FROM PAVED ROADWAY SURFACES THR0004OUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 10. PROVE TEMPORARY SEDeMENTATION BASINS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER_ 11. ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LOCAL WATERSHED DISTRICT SHALL BE SATISFIED PER THE APPROVED PERMIT. 12. ALL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND IMPLEMENTED IN IN THE FIELD AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER SHALL CONFPCA' PROTECTING WATER QUALITY URBAN AREAS: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR MORM TO THE MFS ICA'OTq". 13. DEWATERING AND/OR BASIN DRAMNING DISCHARGE SHALL BE DIRECTED TO SEDIMENTATION BASINS WHEREVER POSSIBLE. ALL DISCHARGE POINTS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FORM EROSION & SCOUR THROUGH USE OF APPROVED ENERGY DISSIPATION DEVICES, 14. ALL SOLID WASTE/ COJSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL 13E DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH MPGA RECKAREMENTS. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SHALL BE STORED/ DISPOSED OF RJ COMPO AdCE WITH MPCA REGLILATIOP45 15, CONTRACTOR SHALL USE RAPD STABILIZATION METHODS PER MnDOT 2573 AS NEEDED DuFNNG THE COURSE OF THE YORK TO MAINTAIN COFORM INCE WITH THE CITY AND PJPDES N PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THIS WORK SHALL CONSIST OF OPERATIONS NECESSARY TO RAPIDLY STABILIZE SMALL CRITICAL AREAS, TO PREVENT OFF SITE SEDIMENTATION AND/OR TO COMPLY WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THE WORK MAY BE PREFORMED AT ANY TIME DURING THE CONTRACT AND DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS_ THIS WORK WALL BE CONDUCTED ON SMALL AREAS THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE ACCESSIBLE WITH NORMAL EQUIPMENT. 14S WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE NTH THE APPLICABLE MnOCT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS,THE DETAILS SHOWN IN THE PLANS, AND THE FOLLOWING; '.HERE ARE FIVE STABILIZATIONMETHODS APPROVED FOR THESE OPERATIONS, THESE METHODS MAY BE CONDUCTED INDEPENDENTLY OR IN COMBINATIONL METHOD j1: APPLY TYPE 1 MULCH AND DISC ANCHOR METHOD #Z APPLY TYPE 1 MULCH AND TACK WITH TYPE 5 HYDRAULIC SOL STABILIZER METHOD iF3; ANDONSTAD FERTILLIZER d STABILIZER #4: HINSTALL SEO,FERTILIZER AVID EROSION C OL I�AKECATEGMY 3 METHOD NES: PLACE GEOTEXTILE AND RIP RAP CLASS II IN VARIOUS CONFIGURATIONS 1HESE EFFORTS WILL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE EROSION CONTROL BID ITEM. 18. 'kHMNGE OF COVERAGE: FOR STORM WATER O15CIH ARGES FROM CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WHERE THE OWNER OR HPERATOR CHANCES, (E -G. -AN ORIGINAL DEVELOPER SELLS PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY TO VARIDES BUILDERS) 'HE NEW OWNER OR OPERATOR MUST SUBMIT A SU SE REGISTRATION WATHIfN 7 DAYS OF ASSUMING OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THE STE, COMMENCING WORK ON THEIR PORTION OF THE SITE , OR OF THE LEGAL TRANSFER, SALE OR CLOSING ON THE PROPERTY. 17, INDIVIDUAL SITE BUILDERS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ANY AND ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASFOLLOWING, AS MAY BE REQUIRED. REQUIRED ECM'S SHALL CONSIST OF BUT NOT BE UMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: A. STAKED FIBER LOG ROLLS AT BACK OF ALL CLARE EXCEPT AT ODNSTRUCTION/bRIVEWAY ENTRANCE. R. SILT FENCE ON AIL DOWN GRADIENT SLOPES FROM CONSTRUCTION AREA. SILT FENCE SHALL HAVE THE BOTTOM DUG IN NTH SOL. FIRMLY COMPACTED. C. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE HAVING 1' TO 2' CLEAR ROCK OVER CEOTEXTILE FABRIC. D. STREET CLEANING AS MAY BE REQUIRED SHOULD VEHICLE TRACKING OCCUR. INDIVIDUAL SITE BUILDERS ARE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ECM•S UNTIL SUCH TIME AS INOIVDUAL YAROS/VeEGETATION ARE ESTABUSFED. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN OJ SITE FOR CONSTRUCTION WASH OUT USE. TEMPORARY ELASIJ SHALL BE LOCATED AS TO PROVIDE EASY ACCESS FOR CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES AND CONCRETE TRUCKS AS NECESSARY, TROL 19. NCOPOBE PROVIDED TO ALL STORM SEWER CATCH IGHOUT �TT�.MEASURES APPLIED SHALL COMPLY NTH BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR MINNESOTA APJD APPLICATIONS OF MPDES PHASE II AS APPROPRIATE FOR PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. STORM WATER POLLUTION l TION PR VENTION PLAN SCH OF INSTALLATIfSAI G MAINTENANCE TEM INSTALLATION INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE REMOVAL INSPECT & MARNT. AFTER TRIBUTARY SILT FEIJCE MDR TO COMMENCEMENT AFTER EACH RUN–OFF ORAIWAGE AREA IS OF EARTHWORK OPERATIONS EVENT_ REMOVE SEDIMENTS AS REQUIRED. RESTORED. ROCK CONST. ENTRAICE OF EARTHIN WORK OPERATIONS. MAINTAIN AS NEEDED. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT INSPECT REGULARLY. PRIOR TO PAYING. OUTLET SKIMMER AFTER POND GRADING INSPECT REGULARLY. STRUCTURE IS COMPLETED. MAINTAIN AS NEEDED. PERMANENT - UPON COMPLEMON OF INSPECT & MAINTAIN RIP -RAP & POND GRADING. CO'.1C- AT LEAST ANNUALLY PERMANENT. FILTER SWALE CONST. AND AND AFTER HEAVY OUTLET INSTALLATION. RAINFALL EVENTS. DETENTIONPOND DURING EARTHWORK INSPECT & MAINTAINAFTER HEAVY RAINFALL PERMANENT_ OPERATIONS. EVENTS. REMOVE SEDIMENTS AS NEEDED. SEED &MULCH AFTER FINAL GRADING INSPECT & MAINTAIN ND REMOVAL OPERATIONS. AFTER NAVY RAINS (NECESSARY. REPLACE WASH–OUT AREAS IMMEDIATELY. INLET PROTECTION UPON INLET CONSTRUCTION WHEN 1/3 CAPACITY OF AFTER TRIBUTARY AREAS BMR IS REACHED ARE FULLY RESTORED NOTE: CONTRACTOR IS RESPDNSBLE FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL OF ALL APPLICABLE EROSION & SEDINENT CONTROL ITEMS. PROJECT NO. 1 hereby certify that this plan specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer HDMpg7E under the laws Of the State of Minnesota. 11/6/06 ATEType°or//�7/' 7 Signature: primed Mame.MICHAEL HACHEY BY DATE DOH.: 1-1-7-(,7— Rep. No.: 17852 CLIENT APPROV DATE HALLA NURSERY Al P902 EROSION AND GRADING PLAN 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SCALE DRAWING NUMBER REV I W n N a, O a N 0 T—MOBILE ANTENNAS FACING 240' T—MOBILE 6' HIGH BLACK CHAINLINK FENCE 1 W/3 STRANDS A4S OF BARB WIRE FA SOUTH VATION SCALE: 1 REV DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION CHK APPROVED RF FN OP INSTALL REFERENCE DRAWINGS 1 1/11/07 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION R�n,R V"P T—MOBILE FA' 5 T—MOBILE 4'-0" HIGH 4 T—MOBILE ANTENNA 3 ENLARGED ELEVATION • T • •Mobile me MINNEAPOLIS MARKET SCALE: 1/4-=1'— NOTICE: THIS DRAWING HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED AND IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF T—MOBILE — MINNEAPOLIS MARKET AND IS LENT TO THE BORROWER FOR THEIR CONFIDENTIAL USE ONLY, AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE LOAN OF THIS DRAWING, THE BORROWER PROMISES AND AGREES TO RETURN IT UPON REQUEST AND AGREES THAT IT WILL NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED, LENT OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, NOR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN WHICH IT IS FURNISHED. PLATFORM \ J HIGH BLACK ICE 1 A4S T—MOBILE NT CABINETS 2 1 ANTENNA AND COAXIAL CABLE REQUIREMENTS ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE COAXIAL CABLE TYPE T—MOBILE ANTENNAS LENGTH* SECTOR DEGREES r I _ FACING 120' I DIA. I L Al I 0' 0' R1 145' FUTURE CINGULAR RED R3 145' 1 5/8" ANTENNAS A2 TMBX-6516—R2M I 0' I 145' 1 5/8" I L R2 1 1 5/8" DOUBLE RED A3 TMBX-6516—R2M 0' FUTURE CARRIER R 5 145' 1 5/8" (5) RED R6 ANTENNAS 1 5/8" (6) RED B1 r I — � I Y1 145' 1 5/8" I L Y3 I J�� 1 5/8" TRIPLE YELLOW 82 TMBX-6516—R2M 120' 0' FUTURE CARRIER 145' 1 5/8" QUAD YELLOW Y2 145' 1 5/8" ANTENNAS 63 TMBX-6516—R2M 120' 0' Y5 145' 1 5/8" (5) YELLOW Y6 w W J (6) YELLOW C1 TMBX-6516—R2M 240' W Z O 1 5/8" BLUE B3 145' Z J a TMBX-6516—R2M 240' 0' B4 J W ILJ O Z B2 145' 1 5/8" DOUBLE BLUE F_w il O 0' 65 145' Z W U 1 145' 1 5/8" (6) BLUE J U Q W J CC W Q Z w m T—MOBILE 145'-0" w Z Z � MONOPOLE _j 0 z z F a Z Z d J O w F- g O O < z z z W 0 ~ o w z ZOf1 w W O I Q Q N W W W U: O J I r7 CC O N I n N 0 I in T—MOBILE EQUIPMENT PLATFORM w/EQUIPMENT CABINETS Be 1 SOUTH VATION SCALE: 1 REV DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION CHK APPROVED RF FN OP INSTALL REFERENCE DRAWINGS 1 1/11/07 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION R�n,R V"P T—MOBILE FA' 5 T—MOBILE 4'-0" HIGH 4 T—MOBILE ANTENNA 3 ENLARGED ELEVATION • T • •Mobile me MINNEAPOLIS MARKET SCALE: 1/4-=1'— NOTICE: THIS DRAWING HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED AND IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF T—MOBILE — MINNEAPOLIS MARKET AND IS LENT TO THE BORROWER FOR THEIR CONFIDENTIAL USE ONLY, AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE LOAN OF THIS DRAWING, THE BORROWER PROMISES AND AGREES TO RETURN IT UPON REQUEST AND AGREES THAT IT WILL NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED, LENT OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, NOR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN WHICH IT IS FURNISHED. PLATFORM \ J HIGH BLACK ICE 1 A4S T—MOBILE NT CABINETS 2 1 ANTENNA AND COAXIAL CABLE REQUIREMENTS ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE COAXIAL CABLE TYPE NO.PE LENGTH* SECTOR DEGREES OWNTIL DEGREES CONNECTION * LENGTH DIA. COLOR CODE Al TMBX-6516—R2M 0' 0' R1 145' 1 5/8" RED R3 145' 1 5/8" TRIPLE RED A2 TMBX-6516—R2M 0' 0' R4 145' 1 5/8" QUAD RED R2 145' 1 5/8" DOUBLE RED A3 TMBX-6516—R2M 0' 0' R 5 145' 1 5/8" (5) RED R6 145' 1 5/8" (6) RED B1 TMBX-6516—R2M 120' 0' Y1 145' 1 5/8" YELLOW Y3 145' 1 5/8" TRIPLE YELLOW 82 TMBX-6516—R2M 120' 0' Y4 145' 1 5/8" QUAD YELLOW Y2 145' 1 5/8" DOUBLE YELLOW 63 TMBX-6516—R2M 120' 0' Y5 145' 1 5/8" (5) YELLOW Y6 145' 1 5/8" (6) YELLOW C1 TMBX-6516—R2M 240' 0' 81 145' 1 5/8" BLUE B3 145' 1 5/8" TRIPLE BLUE C2 TMBX-6516—R2M 240' 0' B4 145' 1 5/8" QUAD BLUE B2 145' 1 5/8" DOUBLE BLUE C3 TMBX-6516—R2M 240' 0' 65 145' 1 5/8" (5) BLUE 86 1 145' 1 5/8" (6) BLUE • FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO STANDARD DRAWING E5S. 'OBILE 1 PLATFORM S 1 S I hereby certify that this plan specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Typed or MICHAEL HACHEY Slpnatur.:'" Printed Nam: Dale, 1-/7 —✓ "J Rap. No.: 17852 PROJECT NO. DESIGNED BY C. MILLER CH�EC,KE,D EVY�� APPROVED BY NOTES: 1. ANTENNA CABLE LENGTHS HAVE BEEN DETERMINED BASED ON THESE PLANS. CABLE LENGTHS LISTED ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR FABRICATION. DUE TO FIELD CONDITIONS ACTUAL ANTENNA CABLE LENGTHS REQUIRED MAY VARY FROM LENGTHS TABULATED. 2. ALL ANTENNA/COAX CABLES TO BE COLOR CODED AT THREE (3) LOCATIONS USING 1/2- WIDE PVC ELECTRICAL TAPE. A. TOP OF TOWER (ANTENNA LEVEL) B. BASE OF TOWER C. AT BTS CABINET CONNECTION POINT 3. ANTENNA/COAX CABLES SHALL UTILIZE GROUND KITS GROUNDED AT THREE (3) POINTS OF TOWER AS FOLLOWS: A. TOP OF TOWER (ANTENNA LEVEL) ONE END MECHANICALLY CONNECTED TO TOWER. B. BOTTOM OF TOWER, ONE END MECHANICALLY CONNECTED TO GROUND BAR. C. AT BTS CABINET CONNECTION POINT. 4. ANTENNAS FOR EACH SECTOR SHALL BE SPACED AT NOT LESS THAN 10'-0" APART. 5. ANTENNA SECTORS SHALL BE MEASURED WITH TRUE NORTH AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. MAGNETIC NORTH IS 2.5' EAST OF TRUE NORTH. E911 ANTENNA REQUIREMENTS ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE NO. TYPE DEGR°S) LENGTH* DIA COLOR CODE 1 GPS L1 (58532A) — 20' 1/4" — HALLA NURSERY DATE Al P902 11/6/06 ANTENNA INFO. & TOWER ELEVATION DATE DATE 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. /,/7 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA DATE SCALE DRAWING NUMBER REV AS NOTED Al P902 -A1 1 'm N Pe U N Z a W U W W W U 0 W W W W Q W J GROUND PER NEC AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS TO GND. ROD GND. GND. BUS NEW UTILITY SERVICE ONE - LINE DIAGRAM STANDARD (240V) FROM EXISTING (3) 3/0 AWG IN 2" PVC CONDUIT BELOW GRADE OR CONDUCTORS AND CONDUIT PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS M ELECTRIC METER PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS (3) 3/0 AWG COPPER CONDUCTORS 200A, 240V DISCONNECT SWITCH (3) 3/0 AWG COPPER CONDUCTORS PURCELL (3) #8 AWG ULTRA SITE WIRING DIAGRAM FROM EXISTING 3/0 AWG IN H 2O0A, 240V METER METER SOCKET SOCKET / NT H PURCELL ULTRA SITE 3/0 AWG 200A, 240V DISCONNECT SWITCH 3/0 AWG GEN. RECPT. 3/4" SEALTITE W/ 3/8 AWG NOTES: I. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND VERIFY UTILITY POWER REQUIREMENTS WITH UTILITY PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION WORK. SEE DRAWING T1 FOR UTILITY AND TELCO INFORMATION. 2. ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. V I DATE I REVISION DESCRIPTION 11/11/071 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION MO ELECTRICAL NOTES: 1. SEE ANTENNA COAX GROUNDING SYSTEM DETAIL (TYPE 2) ON STANDARD-E2S. 2. CONNECT COAX GROUND KITS TO MASTER GROUND BUS AT B/TOWER. 3. CONNECT COAX GROUND KITS TO GROUND BUS AT T/TOWER. 4. CONNECT LNA GROUND TO GROUND BUS AT T/TOWER. 5. ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS TO BE MADE USING EXOTHERMIC WELD PROCESS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY DESIGNER. 6. FOR GROUNDING OF EQUIPMENT SUPPORT STEEL, ICE BRIDGE/CANOPY AND WAVEGUIDE BRIDGE, SEE APPLICABLE PORTION OF DETAIL TYPE 2, STANDARD DWG. E2S. 7. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO PULL BONDING JUMPER 0 UIC, ONLY IF DISCONNECT GROUND IS TIED TO GROUND FIELD INSTEAD OF SEPERATE GROUND ROD. APPROVED I RF I FN OP I INSTALL I REFERENCE DRAWINGS s GND TO FENCE E 1 S CORNER (TYP) 4/0 INSULATED (TYP) GND BAR ® T/TOWER —� 4/0 INSULATED DOWNLEAD (ABOVE GRADE) GND BAR ® B/TOWER 13 T -MOBILE WOODEN OR STEEL RACK FOR E 1 S ELECTRIC METER w/DISCONNECT & TELCO _ HOFFMAN ENCLOSURE (PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR) T -MOBILE 200A ELECTRIC METER E 1 S w/DISCONNECT (3) 3/0 AWG IN 2" PVC CONDUIT BELOW GRADE OR CONDUCTORS AND CONDUIT PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS TO EXISTING TRANSFORMER (FIELD LOCATE & ROUTE) 7 GND BAR E 1 S (TYP) NA • T • •Mobile MINNEAPOLIS MARKET 4 LNA (TYP) I 0 I / I � I I I I I I I I I I I / s � INSTALL 2" RIGID STEEL CONDUIT FROM CABINET TO A POINT 24" BELOW GRADE PURCELL 2" XL LB FITTING ULTRA SITE n 3 4/0 AWG BARE GND BAR r ® PURCELL ULTRA SITE GNDGE1 on ,) X_ I I (FUT) I I I 4/0 AWG BARE ITEST D1S WELL 2 GND BAR ® ULTRA SITE #2 AWG INSUL. / 1 (3) 3/0 AWG IN 2- PVC CONDUIT BELOW 2" P\TELCO�'// GRADE OR CONDUCTORS AND CONDUIT (BELOW GRADE) PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS _CO PEDESTAL (FIELD LOCATE & ROUTE) POWER AND GROUNDING PLAN SCALE: 3/8` NOTICE: THIS DRAWING HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED AND IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF T -MOBILE - MINNEAPOLIS MARKET AND IS LENT TO THE BORROWER FOR THEIR CONFIDENTIAL USE ONLY, AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE LOAN FTHIS IG BORROWER PROMISES AND AGREES TO RETURN ITUPON REQUEST AND AGREES THAT IT WILL NOT BE REPRODUCED, COPIED, LENT OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN WHICH IT IS OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, NOR FURNISHED. —�- ice-- -- GND TO GATE (T I hereby certify that this plan specification, or report PROJECT NO. was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am under the laws a duly Licensed Master Electrician DESKINED BY DATE of the State of Minnesota. C. MILLER 11/6/06 w CHECKEDBY DATE SwimetTyped um Prkftd %10 w, APPROVED BY DATE Dal« Rog. No.: aIDrr APPROVAL I DATE 1 HALLA NURSERY Al P902 POWER AND GROUNDING PLAN 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. 3 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SCA6E DRAWING NUIIl1ER __ � M `t