Loading...
CAS-06_PLANNING CASE NO. 2020-06226 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 Doug Roper: Why is that? ' Mayor Hamilton: Should we assess the area then to purchase the lot? I guess that would be the question. Where do we find the money to do that? Doug Roper: How big an area? Mayor Hamilton: I don't know. I'm not going to get into that but that would be the only way we could purchase it. Doug Roper: Well, I think that should be explored. You admit you made a mistake, I think you should explore ways of rectifying your mistake. Councilman Johnson moved, Mayor Hamilton seconded to approve the variance to allow Rober Pierce to build a single family home within the wetland setback on Lot 1, Block 1, Piper Ridge with the following conditions: 1. The home shall be granted a 10 foot variance to the front yard setback and shall be located 20 feet from the front yard lot line. 2. The entire drainage and utility easement area on Lot 1 shall be immediately protected with appropriate erosion control as approved by the City Engineer. 3. No construction activity or any alteration to the existing conditions ' shall be permitted within the drainage and utility easement. 4. Determine the Ordinary High Water Mark and maintain the lowest floor level 3 feet above the Ordinary High Water Mark and at a minimum elevation of 957. 5. Maintain natural contours as much as feasible. 6. Alternative #2 is the best alternative for placement on the site. 7. The home be 26 feet in width. All voted in favor except Councilman Geving and motion carried. Councilman Horn: Just for the record, I believe that the record shows that the only opposition to the previous motion was Councilwoman Watson. PHEASANT HILL 4TH ADDITION, TOM KLINGELHUTZ: A. WOOD DUCK LANE STREET CONNECTION. B. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM C. APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Barbara Dacy: The first item that's on the agenda is the street connection ' issue for Wood Duck Lane from the development to Yosemite Avenue. I, unfortunately have to start out my staff report with an apology. Included in 24 r I 221 Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 he Council's packet was a letter that I sent to the neighboring homeowners in he area regarding the Council meeting tonight. If you read the letter you :ould infer that the applicant, Mr. Klingelhutz, is proposing the connection :o Yosemite Avenue. That is not true. Mr. Klingelhutz has never proposed a .onnection of Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite Avenue. This item is being brought in front of the Council as a request from City Staff to clarify the original notion that was made in 1984 so I apologize to the developer. This is a City >taff initiated item for consideration. There are a number of reason why we nade this decision to have it on the agenda tonight and the first one was that In reviewing the Minutes, there seemed to be a lot of discussion about the -raffic issues. People along Yosemite and people along 63rd Street. Since that time, the subdivision is building up. Traffic patterns are occurring. ;ake Lucy Road has now changed it's alignment and it is now currently being improved and as the Council recalls it is not a cul-de-sac or will be in the process of being a cul-de-sac and Wood Duck Lane connection. During the :ouncil's discussion, there was also debate as to whether or not there should ce a decision made on the connection or if we should wait and see and consider it when the final phase of the 4th Addition of the Pheasant Hills Subdivision comes through. In any case, the motion that was reflected in the Minutes appeared to have said that Wood Duck Lane should be created as a cul-de-sac at that time so again, Staff is asking for clarification and also asking the ^ouncil to look at the possibility of extending Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite Avenue. What I would like to go through is some of the existing conditions about the connection. Where the eastern boundary of the property right now abuts Mr. Lyon's property on the east. The old Keenan farm which is not owned by Mr. and Mrs. Nye on the north. The ownership of the parcel is kind of a handle leg type of situation that extends to the east and Mr. Klingelhutz has ownership of 16 1/2 feet over to Yosemite Avenue. The Stoddard Addition subdivision in the southwest corner of 63rd Street and Yosemite was approved approximately 2 years ago. It created 4 lots. The southwestern lot of that, there was a platting restriction filed saying that lot is not buildable until utilities and street access is brought to it. As part of that plat, _there_Wgs. 16 1/2 foot easement reserved as a part of the Sto ar Addition. In that area, for extension to occur, a standard 28 foot width urban street within 33 feet of an easement will be very difficult. There probably will be an additional easement necessary from the Nye property. In summary, the disadvantages to the connection is that there is going to be easement acquisition from adjacent property owners and I know they are here tonight and I know some are in opposition of the extension. The advantages that Staff has looked at for the connection was that we have received calls from people on 63rd Street about the amount of traffic that is going into the development. If you look at the area map from the south and east, Yosemite Avenue to 63rd Street is the primary access into the subdivision whereas on the west side, there is Galpin Blvd., Pheasant Drive and now Lake Lucy Road. The Wood Duck Lane connection would help disburse the traffic from the east and south. It wouldn't necessarily remove traffic but it would help disburse it better. Another advantage that we saw was that it would provide street access to the two landlock parcels. That being Mr. Ryan's property and Lot 4 of the Stoddard Addition. Finally, we looked at the cul-de-sac length. I have noted in my report and measured the distance from Lake Lucy Road to the end right here and that is approximately 1,700 feet. It could take another interpretation from Ringneck Drive to the end of the cul-de-sac is about 1,050 25 222 City Council Meeting - April 29, 1987 feet. I prepared the report in the sense that it would act for access for these properties and I chose the longer interpretation but it is following that they do have access out the Ringneck Drive and Pheasant Drive as well. Clarification on how the extension would occur. Who would be assessed? Who would receive benefit and so on? That, as you are all aware, would be conducted through a feasibility study. If the Counci would choose to make the connection, such a feasibility study would have to be authorize to look at how those issues are going to be addressed. Sane homeowners like Mr. DeSantis already have frontage onto Yosemite. There could be a question there as to whether or not he is eligible for assessment, etc. so at that point, as far as the street connection issue, that concludes Staffs report. Mayor Hamilton: At this time, I would like to ask if there is anyone here from the public who would wish to make comment. If you do, please come up to the microphone, state your name and address and give us your comments please. Harry DeSantis: I live on Yosemite. I got a petition here with 35 names on it and I think the deal that you had approximately 2 1/2 years ago says that it would stop back there at Wood Duck. Now all of a sudden you turn around and change it and then you are going to come down to who is going to take advantage of about three homes. That's about all you could build in there and You're going to have to go back in there about two blocks to get a street from Mr. Klingelhutz' road out to Yosemite Avenue. Then out there you got a safety condition. If somebody is coming down Yosemite Avenue and if you're just coming up over the hill and right there, you're going to have a dangerous intersection. So I think everybody on Yosemite is very unhappy and I know Mark here, he has a lot of problems on Yosemite Avenue where cars land in his yard. A couple times in the last few years. Outside down and almost in his house so it is a dangerous situation to put a street there. I was wondering who is going to pay for this street. Mayor Hamilton: It hasn't been determined yet. It's something that we would have to look at to see if benefitting properties would be assessed or just how it would be done. Harry DeSantis: That's about it. There are a few folks out here who would like to speak on it themselves so I won't take too much of your time. Mayor Hamilton: Harry, your petition is all people who are opposed to the extension of Wood Duck Lane back to Yosemite. Councilman Horn: How many households are represented in this petition? Harry DeSantis: Everybody on Yosemite Avenue and there are 3 or 4 in each family on some of then. They're all voters anyway. Mayor Hamilton: We were just wondering how many families. We don't have a house count of how many homes are there. Harry DeSantis: I could get that. You've got everybody who owns property more or less is on there. 26 223 Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 ' Charlie Hebert: I live at 6485 Yosemite Avenue. I would just like to state my feelings about the extension. I don't want it. I would just you to state your reasons. Really, for what purpose, why does the City want that road? You already mentioned that you do have access out of this new development down to Lake Lucy and Lake Lucy now is going to become a major road. I walk the area all the time. I know there is access. We don't need the access. In terms of emergency response, police, fire, ambulance to this new development, there is plenty of acces. We don't need another access. It would really detract from our existing neighborhood. I would be looking out a road bisecting Harry's house and Twottles who live right next to him. There would be a road right inbetween two houses that has never been there and it's a little unsettling for me. I don't want to look down a road. I'm expecting a kid here shortly and he's going to be growing up with more traffic in front of the street than I care for already and now there will just be another additional street. I know the neighbors across the street have children and they don't want a street literally in the side of their yard. The safety considerations. The visual impact is negative and I just want to maintain the existing character of my neighborhood. We like it the way it is. We don't want a road going inbetween our neighbors houses. Mark Erlanson: I live at 6510 Yosemite. I'm the one, the cars already come racing down Apple Road that turns into Yosemite and they flip over and end up either in my driveway, my frontyard, the sideyard. It's just to the south of where this proposal is. The road goes from blacktop to gravel and my house is ' after it started in the gravel. I love it but we don't need any more traffic going down there. Unless you guys want to help me fix up my yard the next time the cars flip over. We don't need it paved. I love it the way it is but we don't need that much more traffic either with all the paved accesses that already there. ke Schmidt: I live on Yosemite also and I think there is plenty enough affic on the road now the way it is and we don't need another access on that Jim vonLorenz: 6371 Yosemite Avenue. I would like to address some other concerns. I think safety has been brought up. The speeds. The problems we've had on that road. I've been on there for 17 years on a dirt road up to what we have now. The road is taking a beating. Any more heavy duty trucks driving in there, it's going to deteriorate even worse. It's already becoming cracked and the surface is being eroded away. If Mr. Klingelhutz runs his heavy trucks in there another couple years trying to build on that next addition, that road is going to deteriorate down to nothing. Also, we like to walk and jog through that area. Yosemite has very little of any shoulders on it in many areas and we have to step off the road and it's almost straight down in many cases to get clear of the traffic that's already on there. I can address Harry's problems there. Also the fact, I'm right at the "T" of Yosemite and 63rd. It's going to double the traffic coming by my place. As I sit in my yard and I watch the traffic coming down 63rd to make the turn onto Yosemite, I would say only 2 out of 5 cars stop at the traffic stop sign there and you are going to have the same problem up there on Wood Duck Lane. Besides, Harry has his trees there to keep the dust away from his yard and it's going to be a blind intersection with no street lights. I think it's a 27 224 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 very dangerous situation that could be developed. I called one night when ' that car took out the telephone pole just down beyond Harry there and the deputy said he was doing close to 60 mph so it's a serious concern. With headlights coming off those intersections, without the trees there to protect you, you get headlights in your house at all hours of the night. As is on 63rd now, cars miss that intersection. I hear the screeching of tires and they put it in reverse, back up and go back up 63rd. These are all serious concerns that I think we all are looking at and hope the Council will give it their consideration. Mr. Twaddle: I live on 6430 right on the corner and I would just like to say I'm against it. I feel one of the reasons we moved in there, I know from the people who have already been there for a while, might not have liked it when we moved in either, but the location and everything is really pretty back there and with another road. I know Tom has a cul-de-sac back there and he wants to keep it and I know the people on 63rd might object to it because of the traffic. They might want to get rid of a few more cars but a cul-de-sac insures 3, 4 or 5 houses and for that many to build one more road, I just don't think it's worth it. Tom Nye: As you can see, I'm somewhat affected as 1,000 feet of my property borders the entire 4th Addition and Tom Klingelhutz has talked to me about this at one point. He said it was his plan on deadending it there and I guess if the City has a good reason to put a street through there, which seems to be ' their intention, whatever they think is the best. However, I would also like to at some point in time be told how, they are going to have to get a little strip of land from me I think to do it and I would just like to be kept abreast of your plans on it. If that's what you want to do. Councilman Johnson: As I've said in the past, I'm concerned about long cul- de-sacs. Not from convenience of the neighbors but from public safety aspects of having a cul-de-sac blocked during an emergency. How long is this cul-de- sac, Ringneck? Councilman Horn: 1,000 feet. Councilman Johnson: I've heard time and time again that people would prefer to live on a long cul-de-sac like this but at that point when an emergency happens and something happens where they have to escape, we don't have a Williams Pipeline coming through here or anything but that's my only concern for wanting to put it through. I do agree with most of the people on Yosemite as far as it's not an ideal place to put a street out onto Yosemite. I haven't heard anybody from 63rd Street. I was expecting somebody from 63rd Street to be here. lemma St. John: 1621 63rd Street and the reason was for having the traffic cane off of 63rd Street and I think it has pointed out something to you from the comments that were made that there is a traffic hazard on 63rd coming onto Yosemite and that is the most concern. Councilman Johnson: You are concerned about the traffic on 63rd? 33 F_ 225 J ty Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 St. John: On 63rd. Johnson: And this connection does what for you or to you? St. John: It would take some of the traffic off of 63rd but I don't know the speeding on the 63rd, which has been brought up is a problem over __ too. icilman Johnson: So what we're trying to do is relieve 63rd Street for the :>erty owners there. Unfortunately that has the effect of increasing some Hic on Yosemite south of 63rd. People coming from the north. The people ing from the south, I'm trying to see if I have this understood right? No. :k is shaking his head. ara Dacy: If you use 63rd or if you use the Wood Duck Lane connection, are going to have to use Yosemite one way or the other. Again, it would urse traffic. It would even out the traffic possibly between 63rd and Duck Land. The Wood Duck Lane connection would provide access into the Addition and probably an area to the west. It's sort of split in there riding on people's travel patterns and so on. icilman Johnson: Do we have any traffic engineers who have looked at this have made the best guesstimate of what all the traffic patterns are now what they would change to be if this connection was made and if it's not? bara Dacy: The way we approached it is, the final plat application came in in reviewing the case we felt that this was an issue that deserved special ncil attention so we prepared an analysis albeit greek. We did not take site counts as you did on the Frontier Trail because Lake Lucy Road is er construction and everything is in disruption as to travel patterns. So answer your question, no because we felt it was an item that we wanted rification from the Council on. If there was strong feeling about aining the cul-de-sac, then that additional study obviously would not be cilman Johnson: Right now we don't really know what the full benefits or full detriment is because we haven't done the total study. Dacy: No. We have not done a traffic study. ancilman Johnson: We would be looking to do a feasibility study that would ve that part on it so our action tonight would not delay Tom on his bdivision. He may still get it approved, I can't say what will happen, but is will not affect, we would go ahead with the cul-de-sac for design right w and if we decide to go ahead with the feasibility study, what happens to is cul-de-sac? bara Dacy: I think in discussing that with the developer, he can't start the initial phase of the 4th Addition. As they proceed east however, the ling is going to be critical. But in talking with the applicant, he can 29 226 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 Gary Warren: The most important part right now would be the watermain that is forced through to Yosemite but that would be in the existing easement that is already there. Councilman Johnson: That has to be done anyway. Gary Warren: Right. Harry DeSantis: What about the watermain? Where is it going to go? Gary Warren: The watermain is coming from the west along Wood Duck and go through the existing easement to the east. Harry DeSantis: Down the cartway? Gary Warren: Right. Harry DeSantis: We were the ones who paid and put all that water in there, how can he hook onto our water now? Councilman Johnson: It will actually make your water better. Harry DeSantis: You think so? Councilman Johnson: I won't say better in taste but distribution wise it will improve our water system. Tom Klingelhutz: We do pay for your line per unit charge. Each time we take out a permit we pay the City $650.00 for water so it is being paid for each time we take a permit out. Harry DeSantis: Nobody has been out there but 63rd is half dirt and Yosemite is half dirt. We don't need more traffic on that road. We're living in dirt now. Russ Stoddard: Who pays for that water? It isn't affecting anybody besides the developer if they put water from Yosemite through that road. Mayor Hamilton: The developer pays for it. Councilman Geving: Just a comment or two, I'm curious where this whole issue of extending Wood Duck Trail to Yosemite came from. I generally try to respond to people's requests to do something and I feel in this particular case that we really haven't made a case for extending it other than the fact that we did receive a petition here with about 13 names on it to push it through to Yosemite. At the same time, I've got another petition with approximately three times that number that are in disfavor of it. Now the Petition for the people who are in favor of extending Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite all live on 63rd Street and I believe what they're thinking is that it will relieve the traffic on 63rd. I'm not so sure that's really true. I'm ' really am not sure that that will happen because the traffic that I see, at least from my sketch, would indicated that those people are going to travel " I 227 Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 3rd anyway and they are still going to travel 63rd and pick up Yosemite and o south so I suspect that there isn't a real strong case, at least from my iewpoint, that it's going to reduce the traffic on 63rd. Again, I'm kind of he opinion that we don't have all the information we need in terms of who is [oing to benefit if we do extend this. How is it going to be done? How is he assessment going to be accomplished? How are we going to acquire the not going get it easily and to pursue that road because obviously we're n rom the people who are here. So I think it's kind of an initiative that at :his present time is best left the way it is. We've cul-de-saced it. we did Lt when the original plat came in. It seemed to be a reasonable thing to do and until we get a majority of the people in the area there that really desire and are willing to pay for the assessments of putting in that road, I ?ersonally can't see us doing that. I'm sensitive usually to people's wishes and I think all the Council members are and in this case, the majority of the people are telling me that they don't need the road extended. That it's oetter off left just as it is. Until we build up that area and until we get some idea of what the traffic patterns are going to be. I don't know if that 1,700 foot cul-de-sac is such a bad thing. There are several ways out of there and I'm not convinced that we have all the information at this time to hake a decision to extend that road. That's the extent of my comment. Councilman Horn: First of all, I believe the Minutes that I read said that that was not a permanent cul-de-sac at the end of Wood Duck Lane. As I anrprette�the Minutes, that -was left for something that would be decided at a later point. As a matter of_fact, there were several people on the Council at that time that io-ught_it_should not be a cul-de-sac because of the prob�ms—E_Tia�ulJ e-sacs can bring. When people see a finished cul-de-sac they tend to feel that it is permanent so it's not clear to me that it was ever decided that that would be a permanent cul-de-sac at that point. That this was something that was left for later decision. Also, it appears to me in looking through here that it's quite obvious that any traffic that went on Wood Duck Lane would be coming off from 63rd Street. It also appears to me that since you only have one way into this development which is Pheasant Drive, which comes off CR 117, I don't believe whether Wood Duck Lane is there or not, it's going to make any difference to anybody coming in on Pheasant Drive which means that all that will happen is people who come in Pheasant Drive will have the option of going on Wood Duck Lane or 63rd Street. So if you assume that is the same amount of traffic that goes through there, Yosemite is going to see the same amount of traffic whether we put this road in or not. The only difference is that the people between 63rd and Wood Duck will see less traffic because some of it will go Wood Duck and head sosut he Some of it will go 63rd and head north. None of those cars will go pa folks between those two and it seems to me that the real losers in this s hole thing, with the exception of the DeSantis property, are the people who in future will be building along Wood Duck Lane. They are the real losers in this whole thing because they are going to have traffic going in front of their homes now that they didn't have before so from their viewpoint, they are going to be the big losers in this. People on 63rd will gain, as I see it. The people north of 63rd on Yosemite, wont see any change. The people south won't see any change. The people in the middle will see a slight improvement and the real losers are going to be Wood Duck Lane. I have some concerns about how this would go through here too and how it would match into Yosemite 31 228 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 but to me that's the bigger issue other than traffic. I think most of the , losers haven't bought a house yet in Chanhassen. Councilman Boyt: I think we have to go into this realizing that Lake Lucy Road stops prior to getting into Wood Duck Lane. Everybody who is out here from the neighborhood agrees with that? Garry Warren: It connects to Wood Duck Lane. Councilman Boyt: okay, so then Clark, I guess there are two ways in there. Mayor Hamilton: There are three ways actually. You can get in and off of CR 117, that Pheasant Drive. You can get in off of Lake Lucy Road onto Wood Duck Lane. You can get in off of 63rd onto Ringneck so there are three entrances. Councilman Boyt: So let me try this again, is it fair to say that with three entrances that that is residential traffic or is that shortcutting traffic? What kind of traffic do you find going through your neighborhood? Does anybody know? Residential traffic for the most part? Barbara Dacy: Yes. Councilman Boyt: Is there a reason why anybody would take that road if they weren't living there? Tom Klingelhutz: No. It's basically residential traffic. , Councilman Boyt: As it's developed, that's what we're looking at so we're looking at how does residential traffic flow through the neighborhood. I think that is one issue. Then what I'm hearing from the people who have spoken is an overwhelming concern that Yosemite is not a safe road. Is that right? What we're talking about is really the distance then between 63rd and what will be Wood Duck Lane as it comes out onto Yosemite. I didn't hear anybody tell me how, since this is residential traffic that's going to impact the traffic flow on Yosemite and I would be interested in our engineer or anyone for that matter could tell me what the impact is going to be on Yosemite of putting one more entrance there. Tom Nye: You're going to put 25 houses back in there, you are bound to get more traffic cutting through there. I agree with you that my land is 200 to 300 feet there along Yosemite, between 63rd and the proposed street. There are no homes there at all. It's not going to impact anybody. The only people that are concerned are the new homes built up toward the Desantis residence and up in that area a couple three homes but I think when you're bringing the traffic off of Apple Road, up Yosemite to turn into Wood Duck, you're going to have an increased flow and you just can't get away from that. Councilman Boyt: There is going to be increased flow down something when you build 25 more homes. Tom Nye: It's much easier to come through Excelsiore, take a right on Apple , Road to come up the hill. It's been happening. We've been watching. It's 32 229 ty council Meeting - April 20, 1987 ' increasing and we're watching it right now. uncilman Boyt: I think what you're telling me is you are acceptable to ving more traffic come in along Pheasant Drive off of CR 117 and run through he residential neighborhood. om Nye: Or Lake Lucy Road. Councilman Boyt: But you're not acceptable to having that traffic come in from Yosemite. Tom Nye: I think it's quite a narrow strip. I tried to point that out to the Council before. Councilman Boyt: I went out and drove this and Jay said he was out there and I suspect maybe some of the other Council members went out to take a look at this on a first hand basis and Yosemite isn't an inviting place to walk. I agree with that. Tom Nye: That's true but we still do love to walk in the neighborhood and a lot of us do. Councilman Boyt: Right. Now, I know first hand the trauma of living on a cul-de-sac that is put through. I find it absolutely amazing that Mr. Geving would tell me that he could live with a 1,000 foot cul-de-sac or a 1,700 foot cul-de-sac when it's just been a matter of a few months since the Fire Department lined the back wall and said that that was ridiculous and the Council at that point voted 5-0 to put the cul-de-sac through_ Councilman Geving: I won't respond to that. Councilman Boyt: When I look back to 1983 or 1985 or 1984, a few years and look at this, I agree with Mr. Horn that it was ne intended that Wood Duck Lane stop where that 4th _AddJiton stops. I see a issue as one of dealing �ial-traffic and a diffi with cult situation. I agree with you that putting more traffic on Yosemite is dangerous. I don't see how you are going to put less traffic on Yosemite no matter what you do here. When we add 25 more houses here, we are going to add more traffic someplace and some of that traffic is going to be on Yosemite. I don't see an alternative that says it won't be on Yosemite and I think we do have a concern and I agreed several months ago, we had a concern with how do we get emergency vehicles into a 1,000 foot cul-de-sac that doesn't have a backdoor and those 25 homes or whatever that are going to be built in there, are not going to be happy if they come back in here two years from now to try to extend that road then and they are not going to be as safe if we don't. Did you say 22? Okay, 22. Mayor Hamilton: I think pretty near everything has been said that I could possibly say. The only thing that I would like to add to it is Yosemite is of course a very unsafe street and I could see a connection going in there once Yosemite is paved. There has been some requests by some of the citizens living there to pave Yosemite and we don't have the funds at the present time. We spent a lot of our MSA funds tonight on Hesse Farm Road so when we are back 33 230 City Council Meeting - Apri 20, 1987 in a position where we have some funds to spend, I know Yosemite is going to ' be one of our high priority roads to look at to lave. It would seem to me that that would be the time to look at making the connection although I think Bill has a very good point when he says, if you do that, if you put it off for a period of 2 to 3 years, the people who are living on Wood Duck Lane and the other cul-de-sacs in that vicinity are then perhaps not going to want the connection to go through because the traffic may increase through their neighborhood. At the same time, everybody wants growth and you like to add to your tax base to decrease everybody's individual tax burden but nobody wants the traffic. Nobody wants to have a neighbor but it seems if we're going to have development, we also have to have neighbors and we have to have traffic and somehow we have to live with it so it's a difficult issue and I honestly don't recall what decision was made when this thing was discussed in 1984 but I would have to suspect that we did not intend for this road to end permanently in the cul-de-sac at Wood Duck Lane. That it was the intent of the Council at that time to have it go through to Yosemite. Again, it would seem to me that the time to put it through would be when Yosemite is improved. When it's paved and put some curb and gutters in there and you can do the job right. Those are my only comments. Councilman Johnson: Has our Fire Department commented on this? I know our new public safety director is pretty fresh. Has this been brought before the Public Safety Commission? Barbara Dacy: No it has not. ' Councilman Boyt moved, Mayor Hamilton seconded to table the Wood Duck Lane street connection untie a proper trrslffi_ study report and the Pu is Safety Director has had a chance to review it. All voted in favor of tabling the "motion and mnf;on carried. PHEASANT HILL 4TH ADDITION: FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. Barbara Dacy: Basically we're recommending approval of the final plat even in dispite of your action on the previous item. We have noted that the area between the cul-de-sac and Yosemite, will still be reserved as public right- of-way to provide access for the utilities that will be going across there and would provide a limited amount of right-of-way for street access for the other parcels in that area so we are recommending approval subject to our standard conditions of submitting the financial security and execution of the development contract. Councilman Boyt: Block 1, Lot 2, it's under 11,700 square feet. Mayor Hamilton: It's 11,392 according to the plat. Councilman Boyt: And I think 11,700 square feet, I'm trying to recall the former Ordinance. Barbara Dacy: The application was processed under the Planned Unit ' Development Ordinance which has since then been revised but at that time there was not an established minimun standard. There are lot sizes elsewhere 34 r 231 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 ' in the development that are below the 11,700. 11,700 came from another part of our Subdivision Ordinance at that time. It was loosely used as a reference point but what you see there has been approved by the Planning Commission and Council and in fact, they did drop a lot of those in this particular addition so there is no conflict there at this point. Councilman Johnson: Is Outlot A, is that a future connection to another subdivision? Dacy: To the south yes. ]man Johnson: I'm glad to see that. Com Klingelhutz: We don't own the property to the south but left a place for i road but our plan is based on that road. :ouncilman Johnson: Barbara, is that property to the south, is that all under one ownership all the way down to Lake Lucy or do you know? rom Klingelhutz: Yes, it belongs to a may by the name of Currico. We didn't bother to tell Mr. Palmer who lives in the house right off Lake Lucy Road but that's not inside the sewer line. Councilman Johnson: So we're not looking to having a fourth interest coming ' through his new subdivision in the very near future at all? Councilman Geving moved, Mayor Hamilton seconded to approve the final plat for Pheasant Hill 4th Addition subject to submission of the appropriate financial securities and execution of the development contract and that Takoma Trail street name be changed. All voted in favor and motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA: PHEASANT HILL 4TH ADDITION, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Councilman Johnson: Actually I had a page and a quarter which our City Engineer helped me go through and answered most of my questions. I was out there looking at this. I wanted it to be noted that grading has already been started in there. That earth movers are going. Silt fences are up but not up properly and not the type that we're looking for. I don't like see developers start before we have... Mayor Hamilton: There might be a reason for that. Councilman Johnson: I would like to know if there was a reason for that. I know it was put a stop to about a week ago by our City Engineer. We've got several wetlands right there that I'm very concerned for. The one on Mr. Nye's property and the one to the south of you. We've got to get very serious with these silt fences. There is a dump site existing. I finally found the Chanhassen dump site. I've been very proud of this town. In 6 years I have not found a dump site in this town but unfortunately have finally found one on what I believe is approximately the area of Block 1, Lots 5 and 6. 'There is some old refrigerator, a couple stoves, a couple clothes washers, mattresses, box springs, destruction debris and I want to add a condition for the approval 35 232 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 that the material be removed there, such as the washer and stoves. The ' concrete blocks and stuff make good fill. I don't want washing machines and this stuff to end up buried in people's yards. Tan Klingelhutz: It was not me that put them there. Councilman Johnson: You own it now. You bought it right along with the property unfortunately. Gary actually answered most of my concerns. Mayor Hamilton: At this time I would like to ask Tom to respond to the questions that you raised. Tom Klingelhutz: You were there Saturday I heard. You also talked to Mr. Schumo who lives on Pheasant Circle. We were moving dirt on their property and also we dug down along the swamp to find out how much bad dirt is there. When we had it dug out, we filled it with clay. We didn't move very much dirt. I have put the silt fence up some time ago because I was concerned about dirt washing in there from last year's construction. I know it's not what you really want but it was something and I certainly will make it better. I's real concerned about the lowlands myself. Very much so. Mayor Hamilton: What about the question about the refrigerators and things on the property. Tom Klingelhutz: They were there when I bought the property and some of them I have trees that are 4 inches in diameter growing right up through them. I certainly can take them out of there and have then hauled away. Tom Nye: There is some question about the inability of water to pass through my property and make it's way onto Lake Lucy. 4here used to be a drain tile that drains into his property that has subsequently been dammed up and a lot of it is sitting in there now. It has nowhere to go. With no rainfall at all, you can see it hasn't moved. It will never be dry in there. There are two ponds that you dynamited I don't know how long ago and those will always be there but now it has spread all out and it has no way to make it's way to Lake Lucy and Lake Ann. Just something I wanted to point. It's going to fill up pretty bad in there and it will affect the back lots of his property at some point in time. Mayor Hamilton: Are you familiar with that Tom? Gary Warren: I was out to visit Tom's site earlier and also have been talking with Tom Klingelhutz about it. The old drain tile scenario I guess is one that is hard to put specific facts on but as Tom admits, the property maybe its higher now than what it was as far as water ponding but it always has been wet to a certain degree. We have a storm sewer that is on the property line as a result of the 2nd and 3rd Addition improvements out there that I haven't had a chance to get back to Tom about but in talking with Tom Klingelhutz, he's agreeable to allowing drain tile to be tapped into that outlet there. We wouldn't drain that pond completely, which I don't think you want but it would provide a high water outlet for Tom so we hope to work with the two Tans to try to make that work out. 36 233 ty council Meeting - April 29, 1987 ' Tom Klingelhutz: If there doesn't get fixed there is going to be a potential problem. If we had a hard rain, he would probably lose about half his r Hamilton: So you are agreeable to work out the problem? Klingelhutz: Yes. There's no problem. ,r Hamilton: Is that alright with you Tom? Nye: Right. It's been dry so I haven't had a problem but if we do get a rain, it's going to be a problem for not only me but for him and his Hamilton: But you agree to work with Tom Klingelhutz to resolve the Tom Nye: Absolutely. Councilman Johnson: On your back property line where you put your new fence, is that your property line? Tom Nye: No. It's in. Councilman Johnson: It's in a little ways because the water right now, as of Saturday, was beyond that fence. Tom Nye: I waded through the water to put the fence up. ouncilman Johnson: I think your disposal site on the south side is already illed. The area marked as disposal site seems to be pretty darn full right ow with the little bit of moving you've already done. I think we've got it retty well. I talked to Gary about silt fencing on the north side to make ure that we protect Mr. Nye's pond. I'm sad that we're going to lose as many rees on this one as we are. Klingelhutz: We're going to try to keep every tree we can. We're not g to site grade entirely back to the lots. The sites we have, as we build s and try to preserve as much as we can out there on the house sites. cilman Johnson: So you will individually grade the lots to the pads? Klingelhutz: We will individually grade then as the houses are sold. ,r Hamilton moved, Councilman Horn seconded to approve the plans and ifications for Pheasant Hill 4th Addition. All voted in favor and motion I ST VILLAGE HEIGHTS, 1,12 MILE NORTH OF WEST 78TH STREET, BILL JACOBSON: A. SUBDIVISION OF 24.1 ACRES INTO 3 LOTS OF MULTIPLE FAMILY. 37 �7BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application Local Government Unit: Chanhassen County: Carver Applicant Name: Ann Nye Applicant Representative: Woody Love Project Name: Nye Property Wetland Delineation LGU Project No. (if any): Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 11/06/2019 Date this Notice was Sent by LGU: 11/11/2019 Date that Comments on this Application Must Be Received By LGU': Tuesday, December 3, 2019 'minimum 15 business day comment period for Boundary & Type, Sequencing, Replacement Plan and Bank Plan Applications NCA Decision Type - check all that apply ®Wetland Boundary/Type ❑Sequencing ❑Replacement Plan ❑Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ❑No -Loss (8420.0415) ❑Exemption (8420.0420) Part:❑A❑B ❑C❑D❑E OF ❑G ❑H Subpart:021130405 11607 0809 Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) WCA Impact Area Application Materials ® Attached ❑ Other' (specify): ' Link to ftp or other accessible file sharing sites is acceptable. Comments on this application should be sent to: LGU Contact Person: Todd Gerhardt E-Mail Address: TGerhardt@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Address and Phone Number: 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-227-1119 Decision -Maker for this Application: ®Staff ❑Governing Board/Council ❑Other (specify): Notice Distribution (include name) Required on oil notices: IR SWCDTEP Member: Aaron Finke ® BWSR TEP Member: Ben Carlson ® LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): Todd Gerhardt, City of Chanhassen; Andi Moffatt, WSB N DNR Representative: Leslie Parris, Jennie Skancke ® Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: Heidi Quinn, MCWD ® Applicant (notice only): Ann Nye ® Agent/Consultant (notice only): Keara Pringle Optional or As Applicable: ® Corps of Engineers: ❑ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ® Members of the Public (notice only): Terry Jeffery, RPBCWD ❑ Other: Date: 1Signatu � BWSR NOA Form — November 5, 2019 1 This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3. BWSR NOA Form — November 5, 2019 IBOARD OF WATER . AND SOIL RESOURCES Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application Local Government Unit: Chanhassen County: Carver Applicant Name: Ann Nye Applicant Representative: Woody Love Project Name: Nye Property Wetland Delineation LGU Project No. (if any): Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 11/06/2019 Date this Notice was Sent by LGU: 11/11/2019 Date that Comments on this Application Must Be Received By LGU': Tuesday, December 3, 2019 rnmimum i� ousmess day comment period for isoundarya type, Sequencing, Replacement Plan and Bank Plan Applications WCA Decision Type - check all that apply ®Wetland Boundary/Type ❑Sequencing ❑Replacement Plan ❑Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ❑No -Loss (8420.0415) ❑Exemption (8420.0420) Part:❑A❑B ❑C❑D❑E OF ❑G ❑H Subpart: ❑2❑3❑4❑5 13607 ❑809 Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Impact Area Proposed: Application Materials ® Attached ❑ Other' (specify): ' Link to ftp or other accessible file sharing sites is acceptable. Comments on this aoolication shnuld he cent tn- LGU Contact Person: Todd Gerhardt E-Mail Address: TGerhardt@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Address and Phone Number: 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-227-1119 Decision -Maker for this Application: ®Staff []Governing Board/Council ❑Other (specify): Notice Distribution (include name) Required on all notices: Z SWCD TEP Member: Aaron Finke 9 BWSR TEP Member: Ben Carlson ® LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): Todd Gerhardt, City of Chanhassen; Andi Moffatt, WSB ® DNR Representative: Leslie Parris, Jennie Skancke ® Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: Heidi Quinn, MCWD ® Applicant (notice only): Ann Nye ® Agent/Consultant (notice only): Keara Pringle 7ptional or As Applicable: ❑ Corps of Engineers: ❑ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ® Members of the Public (notice only): Terry Jeffery, RPBCWD ❑ Other: Signature: Date: BWSR NOA Form — November 5, 2019 1 Ann and all, Good afternoon. I was able to try a few different subdivision ideas for 164163rd St. W property. I believe all are permittable under current zoning (I've attached the sub. Code section for RSF 1 and the wetland section). The City allows "flag lots" and that does open the door to some creative ways to get the lot widths. I don't see how you could yield more than 5 lots without rezoning or adding in some other parcels. All concepts assume that stormwater management would be done by a combination of expansion of the existing ponds in the existing drainage and utility easement and creation of a storage area by the likely wetland low area in the east side of the site. Lastly, the east wetland is a big question mark for whomever develops the piece, if that one ends up large it could affect the amount of lots on the site (depending on the plan chosen). For the options I looked at it a few different ways. Concept 1 Notes: • Could keep the existing home • Would propose to extend a public road along the south end of the parcel within the existing right of way. • Would propose to have the existing homeowner to the south connect to the new road and their old driveway would be converted to a trail that would be for peds and only for emergency services giving the City a 2nd fire access to Wood Duck Lane. Concept 2 Notes: • Possibly could keep the existing home, would need to survey it to confirm the location • Least amount of new road, however, it does not give the City a further road extension —though some additional right of way would be dedicated for that extension. City probably won't be a fan of this option. • Least costly for a developer. Concept Notes: • Gives the City what they want for a secondary connection with full control by the developer of the parcel • Requires the most new road but does not require and additional parcels • Requires heavy use of the City's flag lot ordinance. • Lot 3 is a bit of an odd lot, it does work but needs a 125' depth to meet zoning, which can be done. I also left a small strip between lots 4 and 5 in the concept but would probably wouldn't make sense other than for area. • Could possibly keep existing home if it fit with setbacks. Last 2 attachments: 1. RSF 1 zoning code that shows the lot requirements including 'flag lot' design. 2. Wetland protection section of the code. Defines buffer requirements per each class of wetland. I hope these help you market the property to potential developer / builders. Thanks again for contacting Alliant Engineering, Mark Mark Rausch, PE (MN) PRINCIPAL Alliant Engineering, Inc. 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700, Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.767.9339 DIRECT 1612.758.3080 MAIN www.alliant-inc.com i � LU 00 63RD ST W ® ® w � Q A pp Ir rC,r AMITY i L f,F.JLNT A eaoP , SWM we1LnN�� rF I Nti�SSIWl) anno atW,. , w rnxt wNwwTl IlJ—° o _ 63 RC edsr STREET a I 83 RD STREE -----------................apt➢!..___ I �� 1 q .... x•n p IW ' bN to P __ n Y. B iv y i �Il 111 �n `wcs) va [ L...._.....Fex.ap_....__. -.. I,,. "'_?n 1 ...__�._ - dp...._..Y r I�\AT 1 -_._ �I m t I I ' 1 , --; _ ..... ..; ..1 S T 0 D D ap IN K[l w O mwm w-pc u- Iw x all Mx pIK MNXC. by LIC[NLL ypl LwT. ..xexN N.1.1 A. :nury L.LnWn w 1 __ ew '000 Ow luxe d.C. rm Ix n,mx, uNLaa o e ml(1 Ixpuxm, 9Io...- un loll •lhw vorx wo .wmxwo Rlowor- lr uxw thus, owuxne Ix mAr[o. rwMlxn MOTI, Tx[ [.r LIM[ by ,.a NO,IV,y l ..". OR 1NL NpIrMW[aT W.MT[R byMITga ,, TONIC... W RI MN.. as WtlAYMw .R i U w..NORTx. Y— -wmx lnv or Tw 9 I94I'fl°W by 1I1 M TN I. [ MW W e NO 49 I wKL. [, Ee., ne. n I�MDRJIVRRCIT is, ' Ras 1 ...... nahall,rLl..•. ewx AL 011ex f This pxKlPr[: rFa XvuWl L. aeeee.<! .ne L«n. L'n r. uwe.a M.NWa W rn, I • at pjnll Od na pa. Un ane JOnnl. Lf wr.... M.b•na a u. .ad Trl. LI�.r.M.nl W.Mn :e .n A>WC., ion. aut•v Or W.<Ir• cOfva.•tIW. W n•,•.. er In. miiwine l.•anN•e pW It•.ue In ta. 0untr Or c. r..., o NlnnWet•, le v1 TA•t p•fl Or tn• NO<INWt 4wrwr e! tM NaetMwt port., as ....... f, TwWMp It.. I.... as. de«rlbOd W fellw>: eman<In. u . wl" w enieOIL'I.'. Flynn f .ad; lb nfast s leuint 11 J:,eas - Inu... . 00 ::n••a r x[ :iane•a sw..l roe, « .. 1...� n r .. past. OR eh .aen� <nI hits iini Mlnl�)11 1[I twi, x0reni nFO:a. egine nFT.:po nr`Mexii.op (nt. o•.e tn..n. I. b. wn9... a p..n•e « w o.MT MIMI ane m 1...by en..1. ad a.dlwt. f0 ln. v::au< mf puFue ws nrwar tn• n.wt .nd wit a n. .w n . far dr.l ny...J uuuI, 1.11...... NONn .n M. psW. In T a MW.11as ... I., l0edast ane a«F 1. a[addW • d Wet In T. Phillip wd I.R.L. 1. WWtln W.I. n.r... 10 tna1. Mn.• nl• ..1. O[ �Y�aa�y� Ip p{- •ntl •alelM1 In CItY l.d. Vl &vinp• and Lovn N e<I.1�p1M• n d F••• prWa 1w.e�' fT• preMT-tirllliTi ane le• a Oee•ta • l b• n•r•unf0 •ff I_ hi• J(dite•Y f I `Wl CIT mial, 9 D6 p MM MXOGaAT 10a WILLIS L. GILLIARD CIVIL EMIKER AND 4N0 "1110R A R T A D D I T I O N R. DOC. NO. srata pp xlxxpwTF muxn DI __ w� Tn. mr.velm Ln«ruvrnl e. •nnwleawe Mmn ve Inl. J{9d.r or - nabendJ Li[.rveell u. swadxn ,ne L•MrYn T. senee.rl, naeeene •na Nlf., .ne x.rth TTn . x�r�t .'�a dwnle wrtln, r ..iRx'n� w __.._ ej AIR n`a P r• eN/�[� ClUM o0 xl MNBPIN capmr m xsxxevlx T,•�< Tpyvry/rpy loin[ IWtf rlvavetl nip ,:,, -,., i •r n�• Q 19�`/[ /bacl�bmL, sa ge 9 wF Minn aaEa xT v In Co Y. � r Ix Ce4lrrlen Baplre 1 Mstay eat1 1 th I 1 I's m e' end platted the yrop•rly eefc..bce on this plat as SMDDMT dwITIOx: tnnl If- -a 1• a- « t .pro.nMtien nF h. wfnn Ih.I ell elate«a. rear < v ab.rn un lniaeelEoinlne::v .ne nwarwln• tell ear eu!:" - : FLf nEiNn'min pnt I.ne ,:1:, . taO ee a. list. ^ . ^•^ l✓iYt 7%�S1sdPri RlTite Z-. volal� .,a .1 xlxxmmA auxlr of C.I. la. I.... w.nl ra. aba-lodm r.wsolW ......... Inls ar1q�w] .L __ 1pyb. br xllll. u. cullnnl. Lend Pur.I sre.. a.NR.slu' n r Rr w7�"v` xr LoyalulOnerplr . _ CNAXNMeax. XIXNtl90TA Tnjvl«e1wilnl F MTt^WITI[(X ree) aprare we wcePL.1 am. Cl t) Louncll of !ne GICY o[ GMnhWaen. xl nne.otr. +: e CwxtY suevXTM, calve. Launhr, MIR...... w Pu..R. m enlace. ns. m....... Mr. Of I,,l. .al. plat M• a....ppr.,.' this TxwpMe O. a.. L.... r Cnwn as ..Y., LOYNTr TL NaPMM, CerWe Countl....... a" 1 h<W.Y rtlfy lhet tb. l..e. able r.1 bf is .�. it, th• I.., I. —lb., ee this Ia., as aI ', nw[TIOM bal.been 1.11 a 1111• ll@ deT e[ 19 O. 1. DAxuE. Gwnlr T<easer•r p - CWNn AWITIM.. Call., CwmtY, Nlnewots 0 i.eghY < rta[Y th6 IMn �"�p``del lnOwnt (er ell YY prior to f9�,. it, I.,dn<rlaid OR this pl<t and r n [ae mtOrw. pled MIa� sgLn•d.l FIGxVO J. 9wLt, <ounly AutlltOe h ,�wmn .�dfk11.� Couxn RICN§M, arwr C.11, MI«wele I barely wwmI MO.rtaq III this put of aTIDMRT MILITJEN r., rhea this der Or lo_. u4mn _.M. D« CM, r. xMwx Je., m,,.lr R«..ear 131 ioi Ovi; S' WIDTH 0 WAY r� :L.r INDICA , i f r o a fl I' BEARIN i ^ . L---__-______-________J 33ro THE V /J , ------------------J 104.00 136.41 ,^� 33 NORTHr >fs.a0 TAKOMA-::-is°:4e- TRAIL 16.6�< :.- '�' RANGE — PHFAS:4:' _. 0.B7-...._ o _....... r n-SOUTH $ 89028 59 W'� LINE OF THE NW, I/4 OF THE NW. 1/4 N'J. :, Q I OF SEC. 2, T. 116 N., R. 23 W A r SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NW. 1/4 OF in THE NW. 1/4 OF SEC. 2, T. 116 N., R. 23 W. N BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit: Chanhassen County: Carver Applicant Name: Ann Nye Applicant Representative: Woody Love Project Name: Nye Property Wetland Delineation LGU Project No. (if any): Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 11/13/2019 Date of LGU Decision: 12/10/2019 Date this Notice was Sent: 12/11/2019 WCA Decision Type - check all that apply ® Wetland Boundary/Type ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ❑ No -Loss (8420.0415) ❑ Exemption (8420.0420) Part:❑A❑B ❑C❑D❑E OF ❑G ❑H Subpart:112030405 ❑607 0809 Kepiacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Wetland Impact Area: Wetland Replacement Type: ❑ Project Specific Credits: ❑ Bank Credits: Bank Account Nu Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any) Fff Approve ❑ Approve w/Conditions ❑ Deny ❑ No TEP Recommendation LGU Decision ❑ Approved with Conditions (specify below)' ® Approved' ❑ Denied List Conditions: Decision -Maker for this Application: ® Staff ❑ Governing Board/Council ❑ Other: Decision is valid for: M 5 years (default) ❑ Other (specify): upp,uw, a ,uL vouu unun aw3n conprms me wimarawm of any requirea wenona Dank crearts. kor prolect- specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid. �lju rmamgs—Attacn document(s) and/or insert narrative providing the basis for the LGU decision'. ® Attachment(s) (specify): Wetland Delineation Figure ®Summary: The TEP reviewed the boundary on November 13, 2019. No changes or revisions were requested. The boundary is approved. rmmngs must consider any mp recommendations. AAached Project Documents ® Site Location Map ❑ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify): BWSR NOD Form — November 12, 2019 1 Appeals of LGU Decisions If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail. The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why the decision is in error. Send to: Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 travis.permundson@state.mn.us Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision? M Yes' _ ❑ No 'if yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process. Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable) Send petition and $50.00 to 7700 Market Boulevard, PO Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Notice Distribution (include name) nuqunru un uu nvu,o. ® SWCD TEP Member: Aaron Finke M BWSR TEP Member: Ben Carlson ® LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): Todd Gerhardt, City of Chanhassen; Andi Moffatt, WSB ® DNR Representative: Leslie Parris, Jennie Skancke ® Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: Heidi Quinn, MCWD ® Applicant: Ann Nye ® Agent/Consultant: Keara Pringle Optional or As Applicable: ® Corps of Engineers: ❑ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ® Members of the Public (notice only): Terry Jeffery, RPBCWD ❑ Other: Signature: Date: This net ce and accomoanvine aoolication materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 9420.0255, Subp. 3. BWSR NOD Form — November 12, 2019 Appeals of LGU Decisions If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail. The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why the decision is in error. Send to: Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 travis.germundson@state.mn.us Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision? N Yes' ❑ No 'If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process. Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable) Send petition and $50.00 to 7700 Market Boulevard, PO Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Notice Distribution (include name) Regwreu un un nuuLo. N SWCD TEP Member: Aaron Finke N BWSR TEP Member: Ben Carlson N LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): Todd Gerhardt, City of Chanhassen; Andi Moffatt, WSB N DNR Representative: Leslie Parris, Jennie Skancke N Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: Heidi Quinn, MCWD N Applicant: Ann Nye N Agent/Consultant: Keara Pringle Optional or As Applicable: N Corps of Engineers: ❑ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): N Members of the Public (notice only): Terry Jeffery, RPBCWD ❑ Other: Signature: Date: � J z - is This notke and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per uvM.W.", auoP. a. BWSR NOD Form — November 12, 2019 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen To: Subject: Ken Ashfeld RE: Private Streets Hi Ken, Hope all is well. Kate's statement is accurate. The City Code permits a maximum number of 4 homes to be served via private street in the Single Family Residential District (RSF). All existing private streets serve 4 homes or less. Your e-mail was sent to the City Council and will be attached to the staff report as part of the public record. I have not received any comments from the Council but that is normal. I cannot comment on your statement "Wondering if I have no shot" as staff is a recommending body only. Sincerely, �iewvu Sharmeen AI-Jaff Senior Planner CITY OF CHANHASSEN PH. 952.227.1134 FX. 952.227.1110 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us ACV From: Ken Ashfeld <KAshfeld@maplegrovemn.gov> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 4:30 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen <SAI-Jaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Private Streets Sharmeen, Quick question. It was stated by Kate or you that a private street can only have four houses on it. That seems extraordinarily low as compared to what other cities do. On other Chanhassen private streets, are there any with more than four homes? Thank you for all you do. I assume that Councilmembers received my email to them sent on May 7. Have you heard anything from any of them? Wondering if I have no shot. Ken Ken Ashfeld I City of Maple Grove Director of Public Works/City Engineer 12800 Arbor Lakes Parkway No. Maple Grove, MN 55369 (763)494-6351 kashfeld P maolearovemn.eov City of Maple Grove AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: kashfeld <kashfeld@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 1:46 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Fwd: Nye Addition Attachments: Nye Addition.eml ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: kashfeld <kashfelda,%unail.com> Date: Thu, May 7, 2020 at 1:43 PM Subject: Fwd: Nye Addition To: btiomhomna,ci.chanhassen.mn.us <btiomhom(&ci.chanhassen.mn.us>, dcampionaci.chanhassen.mn.us <dcam_pion(d.)ci.chanhassen.mn.us>, ervanna,ci.chanhassen.mn.us <ervanaci.chanhassen.mn.us>, icolemanAci.chanhassen.mn.us <icolemanaci.chanhassen.mn.us>, jmcdonaldaa.ci.chanhassen.mn.us <imcdonald(a,ci.chanhassen.mn.us>, kaanenson(o)ci.chanhassen.mn.us <kaanenson(a,ci.chanhassen.mn.us>, saljaff@c.i.chanhassen <saljaff@c.i.chanhassen>, ttperhardt(a,ci.chanhassen.mn.us <tgerhardt(a,ci.chanhassen.mn.us> CC: kashfeldi7a,gmail.com <kashfeldCa.Pmail.com> ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Ken Ashfeld <KAshfeld0)maplegrovemn.gov> Date: Thu, May 7, 2020 at 1:05 PM Subject: Nye Addition To: kashfeldna,Qrnail.com <kashfeld( gmail.com> Honorable Mayor and City Council, I attended the Planning Commission meeting of May 5, 2020 and provided written and verbal comments to the Commission. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing for the item of which I testified, Nye Addition, the Commission voted to recommend approval for your consideration at the regularly scheduled City Council meeting of May 26, 2020. 1 appreciate the opportunity to contact you directly with comments and concerns related to the Nye Addition and appeal to you to deny the application and/or delay that decision until the City makes further decisions to the planning for the extension of Wood Duck Lane to connect with Yosemite. I beg your indulgence with the amount of information that I wish to present here and appreciate your time and efforts. Firstly, my name is Ken Ashfeld and am representing my wife Barb, as well. We reside at 6480 Yosemite, "6480 Yosemite", and currently access our property via private drive over Takoma Trail, i.e. the intended partial right of way for Wood Duck Lane extended. When we purchased 6480 Yosemite, we were given the following drawing by our agent, the source of which is unknown but presumably endorsed by the City, and told that it is fully the intent of the City to require the extension of Wood Duck Lane as part of the Nye and 6480 Yosemite developments. Apparently, it has been historically thought that there would be five lots created from the Nye parcel and three lots from the 6480 Yosemite parcel. That all made sense to me. The reason for our objection to the approval of the Nye Addition is that such approval creates an underutilization of their parcel which seems to go contrary to the objectives of the overall plan and densities far short of the City's comprehensive plan. There seems to have been some lapse of judgment as it relates to decisions made quite a quite few years ago (certainly not a reflection of staff, just a reflection of the era) that continue to impact and harm our property still today. To summarize: 1. In 1986, the City approved the Stoddart Addition which dedicated the northerly 16.5 feet of the existing Takoma Trail right of way, west of Yosemite. In 1987, Pheasant Hills 4`b Addition was approved which dedicated the southerly 16.5 feet of Takoma Trail. Neither of these dedications provide adequate right of way for a public street and actually, the dedications do not line up with the intended extension of Wood Duck. It would have been advantageous, at that time, to acquire the right of way for public street purposes as opposed to placing that burden today on property owners to the west. There are houses now in the way that have been expanded and improved. In fact, the owners of those two homes have no desire to sell right of way now. 2. In 1987, Pheasant Hills 4' Addition established Pintail Circle which, in my opinion, should have been designed to extend the cul de sac to serve the southerly portion of 6480 Yosemite, regardless of the intent to extend Wood Duck Lane. Recognizing the fact that platting requires a public hearing, the City is entrusted to prevent one property use from preventing another to enjoy its highest and best use. There is no motivation for a developer to provide that protection and City staff is most skilled at ensuring that trust. In effect, there would not need to be a cul de sac extended southerly from Wood Duck extension to serve our property if the design was appropriate. 3. In 1987, Pheasant Hills 4te Addition was approved establishing a temporary cul de sac with intentions to extend to Yosemite. It could be argued that notice in the form of a covenant on the affected properties or a sign should have been installed to inform the neighborhood that it is the intent to extend the street. This informational approach works well. Even with a substandard design width, the appearance and environmental surroundings of the physical cul de sac conveys the sense that the dead end street is permanent. I understand the neighborhood objection to the extension. 4. In 1994, City approved a sewer and water service extension to 6480 Yosemite along a narrow 5 foot easement between 1671 and 1681 Pintail Circle. Normally, such an installation between property lines like this would be typical City standard watermain and sewer pipes. They are not and in the form of a typical residential service. Oddly enough, the curb stop is up by our house as opposed to at the street. This is going to be a problem in the near future. My experience with the material used is that there starts to be problematic leaks between 30 and 40 years after installation. To avoid digging up these two property owner's yards, at least the water service should be redirected to an appropriate location, which would be an extension of utilities into 6480 Yosemite under a development scenario. I am not sure how to address the responsibility for this cost when it occurs. 5. If the intention of the extension of Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite is to provide the benefit of a secondary public safety access to the Pheasant Hills neighborhood, the City should have required a cash escrow from the developer of Pheasant Hill as payment for their share of the cost. Perhaps this was in fact done and only the City can answer that. 6. Planning Commission recommendation to approve the Nye Addition perpetuates the creation of large acreage parcels that, according to the Staff report, does not meet minimum density requirements of the City Code. In addition, the lot arrangement is such that the approval eliminates any motivation on the part of Nye or successors to pursue the extension of Wood Duck Lane. The cost of infrastructure to build the extension of Wood Duck Lane and necessary cul de sac streets to serve both the Nye property and 6480 Yosemite, as shown in the graphic, is on the order of $100,000 per lot based upon 5 potential lots on Nye and 3 potential lots on 6480 Yosemite. That is a high cost and with all the other development costs, developing these parcels are on the very edge of being feasible. If either Nye or 6480 are not included in the cost sharing, for all intents and purposes, the extension of Wood Duck is unfeasible and will never happen. That is fine with us, and perhaps preferable, as long as there is an alternate plan for access to accommodate development of 6480 Yosemite. If removing the Nye property from any obligations related to roadway extensions is indeed factual, and it remains the City's desire to extend Wood Duck Lane, even in the face of resident opposition, I find the staff recommendation to approve the plat a bit puzzling. It was stated at the Planning Commission hearing that the plat included right of way to accommodate the extension of Wood Duck Lane in the event that ever happened. Forever is a very long time so staff s approach to the right of way dedication is sound thinking. However, it could be said that approach is just kicking the can down the road, as has been the case for many years. I prefer to think of it as kicking the can in the ditch! The result is that there is no feasible way to finance the cost of the extension of Wood Duck Lane and 6480 Yosemite is forever harmed. When I have asked what my options are, I have been told to work it out with other property owners. I have to wonder what other property owners. With Nye gone, 6480 is the only reasonable parcel left with development potential and it is left standing alone to solve problems beyond our control. As a private citizen, I have no rights to force the sale of right of way. Only the City possesses those powers. Within my written comments to the Planning Commission, I proposed an alternate plan that in my mind is a solution. I have attached those written comments for your ease of reference. The proposal would be in the form of a PUD which provides flexibility of design, although I believe the design could comply with the requirements of the PUD section of the Code. The Planning Commission started to discuss the alternative plan but stopped short as they viewed the issues as unrelated to the Nye proposal. I understand that logic, but the fact is that the issues are connected and taking action on one parcel while ignoring the implications on other parcels causes me to pause. If I sound frustrated, it is because I am. This controversy has been evolving long before I ever became involved and it recently came on quick and differently than I expected. I am a combat veteran of the Viet Nam war, twice deployed. I say that with some pride of service but also to give you context as to my generation. I am simply too old to fight City Hall, and certainly unable to shoulder the obligations of the City. Oddly enough, I have spent over 42 years being on the side of City Hall. I invite and urge you to take a drive down my driveway to obtain a perspective of what the area is like. Turning into my driveway from Yosemite, envision a 20 foot wide private street within the existing 33 foot right of way. Meeting PUD standards for private streets, the drive would be more than twice its existing width, which admittedly is quite narrow now. You will notice that some mature trees would have to be removed but they are green ash and appear to be infected with Emerald Ash Borer. As manager of a EAB program, it is my opinion that the trees will be dead within two years, if not before. Feel free to drive to our house as there are a number of turn arounds for your use. As you drive southerly into our property, the private drive would basically be where it is today and it is really easy to envision where each of the three homes would be. With extreme caution and individual site grading, as opposed to mass grading, I believe most of the trees will be saved. There are about two trees that would have to go and they are also ash trees. I trimmed them last fall and it saddened me to see them stressed. I realize that it is unfair to you to consider a development proposal without a plan to review. The very nature of a PUD is to provide a positive outcome to the City and the applicant but the plan, again by its very nature, may be somewhat unique. I can't afford to spend tens of thousands of dollars to prepare a plan that has no reasonable chance of receiving the favor of your approval. I only ask that you consider what I propose in the spirit of a master plan of which would have been nice if that had been done 35 years ago. If you do elect to visit our property and/or would like to discuss anything with me, I would welcome your call at 612-581-8716 or a knock on the door. Even during these times of social distancing, I would enjoy giving you a tour. I recognize that with all you have to work on as a City Council, the few lots up for discussion here seem to be quite a minor issue. It may seem subtle and not apparent at first blush, however action to approve the Nye property, as proposed, has a profound impact on our property. Thank you for your time and efforts to digest the information that has been presented here and if I can answer any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Ken and Barb Ashfeld 6480 Yosemite Excelsior, MN 55331 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ken Ashfeld <KAshfeld@maplegrovemn.gov> To: "'Al-Jaff, Sharmeen" <SAl-Jaff(a.ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Cc: Ken Ashfeld <KAshfeld(c)mat)legrovemn.gov> Bcc: Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:22:14 +0000 Subject: Nye Addition Sharmeen, Thank you for the opportunity to comment relative to the proposed Nye Addition, which is adjacent and north of the property owned by myself and my wife, Barb Ashfeld. Please accept these comments and extend same to the Chanhassen Planning Commission and City Council as you deem appropriate. I can't guarantee my attendance at the Planning Commission meeting but if you think it important that I attend, please let me know. Firstly, let me state that being new to the community, I am stating what I understand to be factual from what I have heard from neighbors, the applicant and other prospective buyers of the Nye property. We have enjoyed the couple years that we have been here, enjoyed the open spaces and the excellent planning that is exemplative of the City of Chanhassen. Obviously, you and the city staff, Planning Commission and City Council have been at creating a great city for a long time, and it shows. However, we live on a large acreage parcel which takes a lot of upkeep and adding new neighbors would be welcomed. It is my understanding that it has been the goal of the City to extend Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite for a long time. That appears obvious from the design of the Pheasant Hill development with limited access and extensive truncated streets, inclusive of Wood Duck Lane. I believe the long term planning of the area is sound, assuming that it was feasible to extend Wood Duck to Yosemite. The extension of Wood Duck would facilitate the public safety needs of the Pheasant Hill neighborhood. The current property owners adjacent to Wood Duck, at Yosemite, has indicated to a previous potential buyer of the Nye property that their expectations for compensation for additional right of way makes the extension of Wood Duck unfeasible if only the Nye property and our property is responsible for the cost of acquisition and building all the infrastructure. We do not care to be an obstructionist to the objectives of the Nye family but from my view of the proposal, and if approved, the objective of extending Wood Duck Lane is no longer possible. Although it is admirable that they are comprehending the needed right of way from their property, there remains an encumbered right of way extending east to Yosemite. There would no longer be a need or desire for the Nye property to want to extend the roadway. From my understanding, it has been envisioned that our property could create three additional lots and from my 42 years of City planning and engineering, I would concur. Having said that, the three lots would incur the cost of single sided benefit, which most developers attempt to avoid, and certainly could not take on the cost of right of way acquisition and the extension of Wood Duck. Essentially, Wood Duck Lane would forever remain a very long truncated roadway causing the overall master plan to not be realized and resulting in lack of public safety access to the Pheasant Hill neighborhood, which is the fundamental principle of urban planning. It is not my nature to point out a problem without offering a potential solution. Our access currently consists of a private drive under approval and agreement with the City. The ongoing maintenance and snow removal is recognized to be our responsibility. It is, my suggestion that if the City wishes to approve the Nye Addition, it is also memorialized that our property could subdivide under a PUD process whereby four lots would have access via a private drive over the existing right of way, reconstructed to City PUD private drive standards. In effect, the existing 33 foot right of way would support a 20 foot drive. The four parcels would be encumbered with a Reciprocal Operating Agreement "ROA" filed as a covenant on the properties to required the administrator of the ROA, myself and successors, to maintain the drive to the acceptance of the City or, if in breach of contract, allow the City to maintain with costs special assessed to the four properties with right of appeal waived. Furthermore, a paved connection to Wood Duck Lane would be constructed to provide access for public safety vehicles and bicycles/pedestrians from the Pheasant Hill to Yosemite. I believe this would accomplish the objectives of all interested parties, in that: • The Nyes would be afforded what they are requesting. • The City would have public safety access that doesn't currently exist, and probably never will. • Current residents along Yosemite are not required to lose property to additional right of way. • The Pheasant Hill neighborhood would have bicycle/pedestrian access to Yosemite and safer access to downtown Excelsior without having to navigate Highway 7 and busy intersections. • It is my understanding that the Pheasant Hill neighborhood is opposed to extending Wood Duck Lane for vehicular traffic. • Provide development potential for our property. Without some solution to reasonable access, our property is being denied the ability to subdivide that all properties surrounding us have enjoyed. The properties involved present a very difficult planning scenario and although not wanting to be a critic of the overall planning, the end result is our property becomes deprived and is not able to be in compliance with the comprehensive plan for the area. I realize that it is unfair to present all of this to the Planning Commission and City Council without a specific proposal from us. This has all come on so quick and differently than what I was led to believe and expected. I only wish to state that the approval of the Nye Addition closes the option of extending Wood Duck Lane without financial contributions from the City and exercise the right of eminent domain to acquire additional right of way. Our property will simply remain a large acreage parcel with a single residence. Being new to the community doesn't mean that I am new to the issues created by development. Sharmeen, you, the Planning Commission and City Council take on a difficult task on a daily basis planning for the creation of a vibrant community. You have all succeeded! If I can answer any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at my office at 763-494-6351 (direct) or cell at 612- 581-8716. LT1 Ken Ashfeld 6480 Yosemite Excelsior AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Ken Ashfeld <KAshfeld@maplegrovemn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 8:22 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Cc: Ken Ashfeld Subject: Nye Addition Sharmeen, Thank you for the opportunity to comment relative to the proposed Nye Addition, which is adjacent and north of the property owned by myself and my wife, Barb Ashfeld. Please accept these comments and extend same to the Chanhassen Planning Commission and City Council as you deem appropriate. I can't guarantee my attendance at the Planning Commission meeting but if you think it important that I attend, please let me know. Firstly, let me state that being new to the community, I am stating what I understand to be factual from what I have heard from neighbors, the applicant and other prospective buyers of the Nye property. We have enjoyed the couple years that we have been here, enjoyed the open spaces and the excellent planning that is exemplative of the City of Chanhassen. Obviously, you and the city staff, Planning Commission and City Council have been at creating a great city for a long time, and it shows. However, we live on a large acreage parcel which takes a lot of upkeep and adding new neighbors would be welcomed. It is my understanding that it has been the goal of the City to extend Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite for a long time. That appears obvious from the design of the Pheasant Hill development with limited access and extensive truncated streets, inclusive of Wood Duck Lane. I believe the long term planning of the area is sound, assuming that it was feasible to extend Wood Duck to Yosemite. The extension of Wood Duck would facilitate the public safety needs of the Pheasant Hill neighborhood. The current property owners adjacent to Wood Duck, at Yosemite, has indicated to a previous potential buyer of the Nye property that their expectations for compensation for additional right of way makes the extension of Wood Duck unfeasible if only the Nye property and our property is responsible for the cost of acquisition and building all the infrastructure. We do not care to be an obstructionist to the objectives of the Nye family but from my view of the proposal, and if approved, the objective of extending Wood Duck Lane is no longer possible. Although it is admirable that they are comprehending the needed right of way from their property, there remains an encumbered right of way extending east to Yosemite. There would no longer be a need or desire for the Nye property to want to extend the roadway. From my understanding, it has been envisioned that our property could create three additional lots and from my 42 years of City planning and engineering, I would concur. Having said that, the three lots would incur the cost of single sided benefit, which most developers attempt to avoid, and certainly could not take on the cost of right of way acquisition and the extension of Wood Duck. Essentially, Wood Duck Lane would forever remain a very long truncated roadway causing the overall master plan to not be realized and resulting in lack of public safety access to the Pheasant Hill neighborhood, which is the fundamental principle of urban planning. It is not my nature to point out a problem without offering a potential solution. Our access currently consists of a private drive under approval and agreement with the City. The ongoing maintenance and snow removal is recognized to be our responsibility. It is, my suggestion that if the City wishes to approve the Nye Addition, it is also memorialized that our property could subdivide under a PUD process whereby four lots would have access via a private drive over the existing right of way, reconstructed to City PUD private drive standards. In effect, the existing 33 foot right of way would support a 20 foot drive. The four parcels would be encumbered with a Reciprocal Operating Agreement "RDA" filed as a covenant on the properties to required the administrator of the ROA, myself and successors, to maintain the drive to the acceptance of the City or, if in breach of contract, allow the City to maintain with costs special assessed to the four properties with right of appeal waived. Furthermore, a paved connection to Wood Duck Lane would be constructed to provide access for public safety vehicles and bicycles/pedestrians from the Pheasant Hill to Yosemite. I believe this would accomplish the objectives of all interested parties, in that: • The Nyes would be afforded what they are requesting. • The City would have public safety access that doesn't currently exist, and probably never will. • Current residents along Yosemite are not required to lose property to additional right of way. • The Pheasant Hill neighborhood would have bicycle/pedestrian access to Yosemite and safer access to downtown Excelsior without having to navigate Highway 7 and busy intersections. • It is my understanding that the Pheasant Hill neighborhood is opposed to extending Wood Duck Lane for vehicular traffic. • Provide development potential for our property. Without some solution to reasonable access, our property is being denied the ability to subdivide that all properties surrounding us have enjoyed. The properties involved present a very difficult planning scenario and although not wanting to be a critic of the overall planning, the end result is our property becomes deprived and is not able to be in compliance with the comprehensive plan for the area. I realize that it is unfair to present all of this to the Planning Commission and City Council without a specific proposal from us. This has all come on so quick and differently than what I was led to believe and expected. I only wish to state that the approval of the Nye Addition closes the option of extending Wood Duck Lane without financial contributions from the City and exercise the right of eminent domain to acquire additional right of way. Our property will simply remain a large acreage parcel with a single residence. Being new to the community doesn't mean that I am new to the issues created by development. Sharmeen, you, the Planning Commission and City Council take on a difficult task on a daily basis planning for the creation of a vibrant community. You have all succeeded! If I can answer any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at my office at 763-494-6351 (direct) or cell at 612-581- 8716. Ken Ken Ashfeld 6480 Yosemite Excelsior. MN 55331 zp„ 2G.003540a • � S n � 7S.007r f AA C1iTY r i 1 olYlCi (i0 17 r N / Ly , 7r.•s�e+c 25.41 0041 9 " /iA1 lfIAO 5 A ' _ o dd` ' �( LEN STATE A E ' „ o L qM, z > 0 R. L. ,S OU SLOT G 2 3 0 25."500w a� 2 a ui no. x � r + 25,0033100 :Q 25.0033300 p 25.0033700 yy25.00240C ZAK� w, w w 0 LENVILLA ESTATES °ae"°'. w., n.....s a. " Avw/if h.Mlienpa IDe wllw e/lM Atv/hnell d/M —i J�'-- xvlAr.a/k dxi, .IM etfh a,xY A/ (a MIHA eLanugM etlumW roMn'.xvM ofgme .l gvaW SMIaW/n w,,ddpp��,,rr++gg m,.wln ue.caD1 nMl.eRp M.aw adxnnMvK./. srAe hhM/ al N Nk_JIL __.i K.M.AA, —1,; �r I :.1�1 K B NX L `w 3 Gat IND A0017A04 All a"i..::Ii:iaee.e::vl:iM.::% i;"in� IiYi/ :r�..o: ii•i;":r iix:� :::en'":u°i, r.. n.o. er u. AAxA it rn: .v ` ei.nF.:n v. irCO. a neru rh In. . t ` r. A"... e1 °vi".1 o. r.nnern l• 'AA.ee n%y nLn..L" 'i°.) .r e.xAn.� , N u.No r. �ii1� ni„I u. .. a A I'M A ' ", A A/. °r g" ioD.NN r ..A v% A'Lia n..L .AM III ..a< ��.. ,1 .If x..I n..a v. m In. x—x..., y. ,. In. AM 1.1 .r e.e�. �... C .I L vYiia :•. r.1.r.1 • • re. ;%e`i ...•...".. .1 ::i::n1:u'vrivi i,n::%::1 ne., .n i • n. rIMUI r.. i..na Der rnu r e n n " 1-11I. ne.n.... ... M.....e .ve..— I•rlxnl. ox IM01 MIAMI Iw✓ ran ..A' .1 AM i:"i..n..., n.m.e ..e .v.. e..e A,'.'... If" J^ e.1 er A.t,.,O uD . y L...... ... n... ... L� .41MEN .4i�f71iLl{{01i STai7YII�W4 I If er•e my u.1 1 n• A n I•...e 11 1, • .•�1 aiRi•n%<%moniaY°r�`i ' "nn�siM •I r.rr..suAiAM er %n.. .. ;o.ei .. I"! AM. IM. r1M ..e K.,�n%.. .. .. iM.%; i:`ei::ia:%n"%':: u:"e�:i� : ,au • . r un.• :. y ITMI e1"Xil"iNII u. re1.1611I I.IIr1.en, 11, .n.nyene I.r•xe Al Ani• y/ _ e.r Of L.A. A —.— I'll COMMA Ix ,Ir .r <,,, x..... , . xx x .111 IN.IIL eI 1.1 air 11 cx.xxxsxfx, QAUTA,x y, x.r•. •n ..... A _-- INATI rv"rnM. L...r C-11. ga..IMAM ^�($' AM ..... A 1e n.rl.1 An, xuIMu1. LA., .r In. 1.1. 11.1 1.. A.,, .n.... I ,Iy MI .4.0—f. ujdL. �.alav¢L aoaverou, wl. C.A." A...If.'u. n' !..'P (ar.,V ..... AM I., A.BNt r. ,.ne .—..A AM OI• rr.A AM.. noes. o.ue an ;`.y 11C.Mn 1. IIDtq Irv.Ir ".u1•r y as ��./W�r {t, o -11, ,1 �� Iaua„ HINDER, Irror Ie,"y. "bn.1°I. I' Q' y •e.Irrr In6 Oy�IMta IJL�YI,L" IIII,D ... rn•e DIr ND .r /I�LAMM�'. uyy. n �. Yl... .11.:I. Z;L CUL...InN. ea... 1...IM uo.Lr .11 NDI, ,InsNRIM. CA ... I C—ty. MI.,... A. .MIAMI. 1.1k ••A. n . I. r. yee IM.nlne .. OL eh, o Llmu u,H,o L.. ee.. r.D e. lM: a.r .r r. N.ALII, 1-11 11.�..•.1.1 q� �i� .✓� 1 DELIN ED W ETLAN CURRENT CLASS. = MANAGE 2 1 0. 00 SY SB -a' z z 100.00 10.00 SY SB j�30, • ',]lrl 120.00 d - �----- N E38°27'23" W 299 1 i B' SHED/BARN 6.23 DITIONS ----!'r___ \i-_-- -- f ' 30.00 FY SB '-NEW GARAGE SITE r Q (22' X35' ) �. APPROX I1 WETLAND ,-OVERHEAD POWER BOUNDAR A- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----------------------------------•-------------------------------------- F'I!1 -------- LOT 3. BLOCK 1. LENVILLA ESTATES, SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 116 NORTH. RANGE 23 WEST. CARVER COUNTY. MINNESOTA .. - .'1 ( FmMNr ^� B rea NN.M.,n I Nne M..w . ,. :� ... S..SGMEN., •K,wn nANNAHMAN S ING. . , th• - ...a....,..� Is I • DENOTS FOUND MDNISENT w..X.: .....w n...• w PRd,fRtY IS ZONED fl5f ISINOLE FAMILY RESIDENTTALI D DENOTES SET 5/1' REGAIN N/ CAP, TIC. NO..69n„ 5 flTIl' HAPO , FRONT AND READ SETBACKS ARE ]D. GO ()• DENOTES :ITTREE AND DIAMETER MMSE-1217 50 FT G SIDE SETBACK IS 1D.00 M' DENOTES CONIFEROUS DREG AM DIAMETER EANAEEb.6 50 R o RETLAND BUFFER 15 10.0 . DENOTES P06R PME S.ED/B.R.-260 SO FT MAN,.NYM. p, ' ACCESSORY R£iLAMO SETBACK 1S 15.00 o DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE DRIVEWAY.M5B. 50 FT PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE DENOTES DATE VALVE AND CONNECTION EW STRUCTURET NETTING SETBKK IS ]D.00 pP�GIDx� n�uANl1�� r IMPERVIOUS SURFACE OF EXISTING CONDITIONS CATCH BASIN OIiIONS IS 6581 50 FT XWSE-1006 SO fi Uai v i DENOTES GDDPEDESTAL E.RA%.$0FT N DENOTES GROUND TRANSFORMER SXEDBAXN460 SO / fi DEMOTES DRAINAGE ARROWS DRIVEWAY 524 SO FT FMB M SURVEYOR'S NODES: .5 SNDRN MERE LOCATED IN MDVEMBER BY THE SURVEY CREW IX RE NOT ANE APE NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS DFF ICIALLY DEL IN SATED. THEY WERE L6AlF0 AND HWE DO THE BUILOI NOS. TO S... ATI GNSIiv ARE IN $9 DANUM. O. ALL EXISTING GARAGE L OF DN15 HEARING SYSTEM IS BASED DH ]. THE EXISTING HOUSE MILL BECOME USE NEW NOOSE. ORIENTATION SOUTH SRE WILL BE USED FCR THE NEM GARAGE. ixE SWTx UNE Of `0T ] TO hAVf AN AISSIGNEO ME EXISTING HOUSE BEARING Ci H BB'ti ES' M mLEKE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY SEX KRAxz �'s`Ss ANN NYE _YE— u.MBMAM, w LDNSN. �'✓LU,�/'l/..�,.i. /,-,, -/, Inc./ 1-4 ", Rn )",I ...0 : $zch6L Mrnc-...T,� Mum i wl WE OVE LOW Figure 5. LiDAR Contours (2 FT) Nye Property Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota WGeo iwm U- Metm..1. 11 OALLIANT Legend OProject Boundary LiDAR Contours (2 FT) Carver i; d 16121758 3080 131758300E p Feet 200 r *H •1 �• w�J tip-.. 1 r I • F3 CS W MN NO. I(EXISTll sra. 9+00,11L BLK I / - — / / 6- l EXIST PLUG \� e bi T sl M 0. STA. 10+95, STA. 13+34, / 6"X6"X6"- 6"X6"X6""T" 6=B-END - I a m 0+ t+cg PaC. STA. O WOOD OU K E _ 2 6" BEND HYDRA PDT. STA. 0+00.00 WOOD DUCK CIRCLE 6" VAL BLK 2 1 — — — -- I--' —i— -- — ,—. i---- --- —'--'--- `-----i— -- _— — ---- - -- --- . __.—... :. 1015 _ 1 : ! i YE .................. Fed. Proi. No. DUCK LANE 22 6" BEND E 6" BEND M STA. 18+45, s.ao 12 NK S '--6"X6"X6"-"T" 6" WALVE BEND 3 -'«sa 2 BLK 3 7 , 6" VALVE CROSS (State Proi. No. Sheet No. 6 of 10 Sheets 0 PC- zioao- 01- Affidavit of Publication Southwest News Media State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the General Manager the news - NOTICE OF PUBLIC papers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Villager and has full knowledge of the HEARING facts herein stated as follows: PLANNING CASE NO. 2020-06 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal that the Chanhassen Planning newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as Commission will hold a public hearingon Tuesday, May 5,2020at amended. Top pm. in the Council Chambers J D at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No.� Market Blvd. The purpose of this was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said hearing is to consider a request Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of for approval for the subdivision the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both of 6.4acres into two single-family inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition lots with variances for property and publication of the Notice: located at 1641 W. 63rd Street. Zoned Single -Family Residential abcdefghbklmnopgrstuvwxyz (RSF). Applicant: Woody Love, Engle and Volkers. Property Owner. Ann Nye. Subdivision: Nye Addition. Y. A plan showing the location Laurie A. Harlmam of the proposal is available for public review on the city's web site at wwwcLchanhassen. mn.us/2020-06 or at City Hall Subscribed and sworn before me on during regular business hours. All interestedpersons are invited to attend this public hearing ( n-- n and exbress their opinions with this day of _/ gam, 2020 respect to this proposal. "/ Sharmeen A1JafI Senior Planner JYMME JEANNETTE BARK Email: SAI-Jaff@, NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA ci.ch h c:-n.mn.us _ Phone:952-227-1134 N bGc MYCOMMISSIONESRES01/31!23 (Published in the Chanhassen _. Villager on Thursday, April 23, 2020' No 4858) RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space .... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $14.03 per column inch CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow March 19, 2020 Mr. Woody Love, Real Estate Advisor ENGEL & VOLKERS Lake Minnetonka 18202 Minnetonka Blvd, Ste. 100 Deephaven, MN 55391 Re: Incomplete Application for the Subdivision of 1641 West 63rd Street Dear Mr. Love: This letter is to notify you that the application submitted on Wednesday, March 18, 2020, was determined by City Staff to be incomplete and cannot be scheduled for public review. The items in the attached checklist must be provided before we can initiate the City review process. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 952.227.1134 or e-mail at saljaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner Enclosure g1plao\sj\nye\incomp1ete application.docx PH 952.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD - PO BOX 147 - CHANHASSEN - MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Nye Addition for Subdivision approval. On May 5, 2020, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Nye Addition for preliminary plat approval of property into two lots and one outlot. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential - RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Low Density Residential. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 3, Block 1, Lenvilla Estates. 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single - Family District and the zoning ordinance if the conditions of approval are met. b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and subdivision ordinance if the conditions of approval are met. c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report. d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; 3G;NWO Finding: The proposed subdivision will provide adequate urban infrastructure subject to the conditions specified in this report. e. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. £ The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: Plat. 1) Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets if the specified conditions of approval are met. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 5 h day of May, 2020. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: StevenAVeick giplan\2020 planning cases\20-06 nye addition sub and vaflfindings of factdocz ri w rr- / T/;y A,, or- �pNI � f OEYINE EO WFiIAN \ � t x _ P m 7777. \\ §/ \ E /i� . ) 72 23 k' l i caR� 3T LU 10 ILI )��I / 1DRAINAGE/ \ EASEM WETLAND DEUNE ED -44r \ I CWµ H101.56 lit I Ni *{ DRAINAOEIIl. ra I t IYl EASEM 1 /; - I J & 11, �DN I �I 1 \ I V n \ ` 0 J Nye Property Lot Split - Proposal Debt Project$120 lap.) 3.000 Total Cuturt $ 0.207 1/30/2D20 Proposed Units 2Total Ceat/unR $ 1$S0Dels lnew Task 1 Planning/Survey Phase 1.01 Ethan, Conditions survey 1.02 Esirting Conditloro Survey Phase Total 2 Entitlements Phase 2.01 Preliminary and Final pia[ Subdivide, Submittal 2.02 Final Me, - Survey 2.03 Stoneware, Management Caks far at, Phase Total 3 Construction Phase 3.01 Public Sewer Permitin{ 3.02 CPnatrumon Admin/Service, (Hourly Estlmate) 3.03 Construction Sold, (Hourly Estimate) 3.04 SWPPP Inspection 3.05 At bullts Phase Total Total Fee- Unadjusted Reimbursl6les Total Fee w/ Reimbursl6les Invoiced Amount 0 $200 0.00 aorv/01 0 0.00 $ 5,200.00 $ - $ 0 7600 0.00 0 4200 0.00 #D1y/01 0 0.0D $ 11,800.00 $ - 5 D 500 0.00 D 4500 0.00 0 3500 0.00 NDly/01 D 0 0o 0 1500 0.00 $ 10,000.00 $ - $ $ 27,000.00 $ - $ 0 S - 5 5 0 5 Note, 5200.00 Full Boundary Survey and Partial Topography survey of developable area 0.00 Tree udentMlcenen, Survey and Inventory($1o/slgnineanuree) hourly if needed $ 5,200.00 = Rem. Budget Amount $ 2,600.00 Per Cott/Unit 7600.00 Engueering and Plan Production for Pre/Furst put City, Submittal and Construction Oocs 4200.00 Final Plat Document,Recording Coordination and Monumentatlen Doe would be preformed hourly of needed $ 11.801 = Rem. Budget Amount $ 5,900.00 Per Cost/Unit 500.00 MPCA and MCES Permit for Public Sanitary Sewer Estenslon 4500.00 Assemble a Oomt. Bid Form,A,dst In Bantering Bid% Bid Review Opinion, Const QaA 3500.00 Survey staking of silt fence, public sewer and cul-de-sac 0.00 Assumed to be done by Contractor or owner- Allied can Provided Fee Estimate if Desired 1500.00 All public infrastructure t0 be constructed, coordination with City $ 20,001 - Remaining Budget Amount $ 5,00MOD Per Ceat/unit $ 27,000.00 Per Estlmrte A L£CAL LMRInTA]fl" ILtCOf1O Thtt M hM I/np.M U.;np 1 IM Ccun1Y of CAevr, SIAU cf NI•nnp1A, Jh:TbW n'n'IOFt,'e+Jl: LIX ). }h1 It. LEWLtl1 E}TATEF, A. If pub IV 110p•J CNN,' CO.OtY Nl-I "Dl. CtlNln" t A A:h'l r1MA n• N1A. In t.u•wh V, M.M. Posr C0,4SiRUC7CN AS -BUILT SURVEY - 61RD w F a'1Mrw w I1I F}['IVA/w +4a1,'• 8 I, �r � I4W.IAv1Mpi/1 O.x,1fYIOFCS'4li f14FM Pi•l. Ii"sin 011 T4F TA: F .•.m w LOT F4Y7F0 AF A[i."M FAA1:M Ct [ AP)11A't A1s FQYA'IOFF )At ,t FYAO "M^,f+ Mp1rli• :,ti[ Ip AT OA.AIA• [TI ['J. r. TOTAL. t,tp K R. l I ol .. DRAINAGE 1 EASEM / . . r. 1 ol V0STCa4S7.RU'CVON AS -BUILT SURVEY DIF"AlL AG i o' 0 LJOAL D#JC"T"M G RtCOM CA,. LMNN W1,105W., d..:, be I,* lolom,. I.H LH % Mott 1, LE4'OILtA PIT ATE S.e. 0 puloh, P,*o-d Ciry it Co. mly NMI. %.13 64 IT nl�hllctll ce is INAM14I vin. Is "AID ON T44 14).`14 "IMAl. 9n SQ M .:VI 'm I OWNS AN A"�" OiSOL� OF I WIG GA. 0 A- H fta 'I", "I Pt NINO " N ut,..'t to .... . . is e ..r,e 77 7777777% TWEMM"(SURVMPA 7 7 Li ƒ t : ! : - !{ } -_ [} }{ \ \\/ ! OR Alliant Engineering, Inc. Surveying, Land Planning, Transporlalion, Civil Engineering and Landscape Architecture General Provisions 1. RESPONSIBILITIES AND SCOPE OF WORK AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. (throughout these General Provinces shall include subconsuhants and each of their employees contracted with ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC.) agrees to perform only Nose services defined in the proposal and shall invoke the Client at those rates shown on Me attached fee schedule. Any estimate of cast to the Client as stated in the proposal shall not be considered as a fixed price, but only an estimate (unless otherwise specifically stated in the proposal). In the event that AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. and the Client have not executed this Agreement, the Client's authorization to AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. to proceed with the preform2nce of services set forth herein shall constitute acceptance by the Client of these General Provisions. ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. will provide additional services under Nis Agreement as requested by the Client and will invoice the Client for those additional services at standard rates. The unit rates proposed under this Agreement will be valid for the calendar year in which the proposal was prepared unless otherwise stated in the proposal. The proposal for this Scope Of Work becomes null and void t not accepted and properly executed within sixty (60) days of the date of the proposal. 1. SAMPLES ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. will retain all sell and rock samples for sixty (60) days. Further storage or harder of samples can be made at the Client's expense, upon written request. 3. RESTRICRON OF USE AND OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS It is understood and agreed that all sketches, drawings, specifications, reports, field data, field notes, laboratory test data, cakulations, estimates, plans and other documents in any form including digital files prepared by AL W ENGINEERING, INC. as instruments of ALLIANf ENGINEERING, INC. services and, as such, shall remain the property, of AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. whether the project for which they are Intended is executed or not. Client shall, upon Payment of all fees and reimbursable expenses due ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. under this agreement, be permitted to retain reproducible copies of those documents necessary for the execution of the Pri ('Deliverables') for information and reference in connection with clients use and Occupancy Of the project. The Documents are prepared for use on this Project only and are of appropriate for use on any other project, for additions to this Project, for completion of this Project by others (unless AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. is adjudged in default) or for any purpose other than as defined by We Scope of Services, except by agreement In writing with the appropriate Compensation to ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. Any use of the Documents or the information of such Documents or Me information or data contained therein, without the express written consent of AW ANT ENGINEERING, INC. is expressly prohibited. Such prohibited use Is at the sole risk of the user and ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. is released from any liability for damages arising from such use. Client agrees Mat all reports and other work famished to the Client, his employees or agents, which are net paid for, will be returned upon demand and will net be used by the Client for any purpose whatsoever. 4. SAMPLING AND TEST LOCATION Unless Otherwise stated, the fees In the proposal d0 not Induce casts asspoated with surveying of the site for the accurate horpontal and vertical locations of tests. Haiti tests or boring locations described in our reports or shown on sketches are based upon information furnished by others or estimates made In the field by our representatives. Such dimensions, depths, or elevations should be considered as approximations unless otherwise stated. ALLIAW ENGINEERING, INC. will not provide or check field survey work. lithe Client specifies the test location, AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. reserves the right to deviate a reasonable distance from the location specified. S. STANDARD OF CARE Services performed by AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. under this Agreement will be conducted in a manner consistent with that level of customary professional care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of their profession, practicing under similar circumstances in the same or similar locality, in the same period of time. AWANT ENGINEERING, INC.,. professional services will be performed, findings will be obtained, and recommendations will be prepared In accordance with generally accepted principles of engineering pactImS. This warranty is In lieu of all Other warranties either expressed or implied. 6. OBSERVATIONS SERVICES AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. will provide personnel to observe and report on specific aspects or phases of construction In accordance wilt the agreed scope Of services. AWAW ENGINEERING, INC.'s services do not Induce supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor, his employees, agents or subcontractors. Under no circumstances shall ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. have central over, or be in charge of, nor shall It be responsible for, construction means, methods, tehniques, sequences or procedures In correction with the work. AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. shall not be responsible for any contractors schedules or failure to carry out the work in accordance with the Deliverables. AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. shall not have control over or charge of acts or omissions of any contactor, subcontractor, or their agents or employees, or of any other persons preforming portions of the work. It is further understood that the contractor will be solely and completely responsible for working condition on the job she, including safety of all persons and property during the preformances of the work, antl Mat these requirements will apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours. Any monitoring of the contracIl preformance conducted by personnel of AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. is not intended t0 include review of the adequacy of the contractors safety measures in, on or near the constriction site. ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. will not be held responsible for any contactor's failure to observe or comply with the Occupational Health and Safety Act of 1970, and regulations or standards promulgated thereunder, or any state, country, or municipal law or regulation of similar import or intent. The Client agrees to notify the contractor accordingly. The contactor shall also be Informed by the Client that neither the presence of AWANf ENGINEERING, INC.'s field representative nor the observation by AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. shall excuse the contactor for defects in this work or for potentially unsafe working conditions. r. RESECTION OF WORK ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. may recommend t0 the Client rejection of work, which, in ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s professional opinion, does not conform with design, specifications, or ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s recommendations. 8. WVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws in the State of Minnesota. Should any provision of this Agreement be or became legally Invalid, the will of the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected. 9. DISCLOSURE If during the Course of this engagement, ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. develops data or information Mat requires disclosure to an administrative agency or Other authority with proper Jurisdiction, the Client agrees to such disclosure and agrees to defend, IrMemnify, and hoed AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. harmless from any claim or liability arising from such disclosure. 10. CONFIDENTIALITY The technical and pricing Information contained in any proposal submitted by AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. as to this project is to be considered confidential and prepretary, and shall not be released Or otherwise made available to any third party without the expressed written consent of AUTANT ENGINEERING, INC. 11. LIMITATION OF LGBILITY The Client recognizes and assumes the Inherent risks connected with construction, and particularly subsurface and earthwork construction. For Its part, AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. will perform Its services in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices. AWAW ENGINEERING, INC.'s liability for damages arising Out Of professional negligence, including errors, omissions, or other professional negligence, will be limited to an amount not to exceed AWANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s fee. If the Client prefers not to limit Our professional liability M this sum, AIllANT ENGINEERING, INC. will waive this transition upon the Client's request, provided Mat Me Client agrees to pay an additional consideration for this warder. No employee or agent of AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. shall have any individual personal or professional liability to the Client in addition to, or in excess a, ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s liability under these contact terms and conditions. 12. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES The Client agrees to advise AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. in writing prior to beginning of work a any hazardous substances on or near the site which could effect the services to be provided or the project schedule and approval and shall provide all documents, plans, reports, and other known Information to AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. In the event that test samples obtained during our work contain substances hazardous t0 health, safety or the environment, these samples remain the property of the Client Likewise, any equipment contaminated during our services, which cannot be reasonably decor,aminated, shall become the property and responsibllity of the Client. Such samples and/or equipment will be delivered to the Client. Client agrees to pay transportation costs for samples and equipment and the fair market value of contaminated equipment. 13. UNDERGROUND UTILITIER AND STRUC RES The Client agrees to advise AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. In writing of known or suspected utilities or other underground structures or features which could effect the eerwces to be provided and shall provide all drawings In Its possession which identify underground utilities, structures or features. The Client agrees to release AWANT ENGINEERING, INC, from any liability to Client and hold ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. harmless In accordance with paragraph 1 where subterranean unity lines and other underground structures or features which were not bentified to AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. as required by paragraph 13 have been damaged. Dated: 1/1/2007 Page I of 2 Project NO.:07000.0 14. CHANGED CONDITIONS The Client has relied an AWANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s judgment In establishing the engineering work scope and fee for this project, given the projects nature and risks. The Client shall therefore rely on AWANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s judgment as to the continued adequacy o/ this Agreement in light of occurrences or discoveries that were not originally contemplated by or known to AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. Should ALLANT ENGINEERING, INC. call for contract renegotiation, AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. shall Identify the changed conditions which In ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s professional judgment make such negotiation necessary, and AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. shall promptly and in good faith enter Into renegotiation of this Agreement to help permit AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. to continue to meet the Client's needs. If renegotiation terms cannot be agreed to, the Client agrees that AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. has an absolute right to terminate Nis Agreement. 15. FAILURE TO FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS The Client agrees that it would be unfair to hold ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. liable for problems that may Occur if AWANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s recommendations are not followed. Accordingly, the Client waives any claim against AWANT ENGINEERING, INC., and agrees to defend, Indemnify, and hold AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. harmless from any claim or liability for Injury or loss that results from failure to Implement ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s recommendations Ina manner that is not in sold accordance with them. The Client also agrees to compensate AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. for any time spent and expenses incurred by AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. in defense of any such claim, with such compensation to be based upon AWANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy. 16. REMEDIES In the event the Client or the Client's personnel, contractors, or subcontractors become aware that: (1) a suspected defied or omBsion by ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. or (2) change In the conditions reported by or to AWANT ENGINEERING, INC., the Client shall Immediately, within 48 hours, provide written notice of said issue, defect, change, etc. to AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. shall have the right to take measures which In AU IANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s opinion will minlmlze the consequences of a defect In service. Failure to provide prompt notice or to provide AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. the opportunity to remedy the situation shall be deemed a waiver of mid defect and shall relieve AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. of any further liability. 17. DELAYS In the event that AWANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s field or technical work Is Interrupted due to causes beyond AWANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s control, AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. shall be compensated for the labor, equipment, and other costs AW ANT ENGINEERING, INC. incurs in order to maintain Re workforce for the Client's bene it during the interruption, or at the Client's option, the various costs AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. Incurs for demobilization and subsequent remobilization. Compensation to AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. shall be based upon AWANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s prevailing fee schedule and expense reimbursement policy. 18. PAYMENTS Invoices will be submitted by AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. an a monthly basis as work proceeds. Invokes will be in a format standardaed by AWANT ENGINEERING, INC., and any special form of invoicing requested by the Client may be subject to an additional administrative charge. Payments will be due and payable in full upon receipt of an invoice by the Gent without rvismage, and will not be contingent upon receipt of funds from third parties. In the event that the Client objects to all or any portion of any invoice, the Client shall no[lfy AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. d the objection within fifteen (15) clays from date of the invoice, give reasons for the objection, and pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute. If fees are not paid in full within twenty-eight (28) days OF The date of the invoice, AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. reserves the right to suspend or terminate services and the right to pursue all appropriate remedies, including withdrawing certifications, stopping work on three (3) days prior written notice, and retaining all documents without recourse. If at any time, an invoice remains unpaid for a period In excess of twenty-eight (28) days, a service charge of one and one-haff percent (1 1/2%) per month from the data of the Invoke, an effect" maximum rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum, will be Charged on past due accounts. It is expressly agreed between the parties Mat this contact will be learned to have been made In Hennepin County, Minnesota and that the parties hereto assent to venue for any collection action shall be In Hennepin County, Minnesota. Application of Me percentage rate indicated above as a consequence of the Client's late payments does not constitute any willingness on AWANT ENGINEERING, INC.'s part to finance the Client's operation, and no such willingness should be inferred. lithe Client fails to pay undisputed invoiced amounts within twenty-eight (28) calendar days of the date of invoice, AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. may at any time, without waiving any other claim against the Client and without thereby incomng any liability to the Client, suspend or terminate this Agreement. In the event a lien or suit is filed or arbitration is sought to enforce overdue payments under the Agreement, the Client agrees to Indemnify and hold harmless ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. from and against any and all reasonable fees, expenses, and cores incurred by AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. Including, but net limited to, court costs, arbltnims and attomey's fees, and other Claim -related expenses. In the event the Client fails to pay any Invoice In full, ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. shall have the right to institute collection procedures. The Client shall be responsible for all costs of collection including Ittigabon costs, reasonable attorneys fees not M exceed thirty percent (30%) of the amount due, and court costs. 19. RESOLUTION OF DISPUTE All claims, disputes and other matters in question between AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. and the Client, not in excess of $200,000.00 arising out of, or relating to, this Agreement m the breach thereof or the services rendered by AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. (-Disputed, shall be resoNed as follows: A written demand for non -binding mediation, which shall spindly in detail the facts of the Dispute and the relief requested, shall be submitted, within a reasonable time after the basis for the Dispute has ahsin, to the party against wham the claim is brought. If the Dispute cannot be resolved by the parties within ten (10) days, the demand shall be submitted to-Iudlate Headquartered In Minnesota', or such mediation service as the parties shall otherwise agree M retain, for good faith non -binding mediation. The Mediator's fee shall be shared equally by the parties. Any Dispute between the parties that is not fully resolved by mediation within 120 days of submission M mediation service shall be deeded by litigation in a court of competent jurisdiction. In no event shall the demand for mediation be made after the date when Institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other matter in question be barred by the appliaple statute of limitations. In the event that the Client institutes suit against ALUANT ENGINEERING, INC. because of any Dispute and if such suit U dropped or dismissed, or if judgement Is rendered for AWANT ENGINEERING, INC., Client agrees to reimburse AWANT ENGINEERING, INC., or pay directly, any and all casts and any and all Oliver expenses of defense, Immediately following dropping or dismissal of the case or immediately upon judgement being rendered on behalf of AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. 20.11REFERENCES Client agrees that AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. has the authority W utilize its name as a Client and general description of the project work or service preformed as references to other Clients. 21. SWEMBILITY In the event that any provisions herein shall be deemed invalid or unenforceable, the other provisions hereof shall remain In full force and effect, and binding upon Me parties hereto. 22. WAIVER OF SUBROGATION Except to the extent that such waiver would Invalidate the applicable insurance coverage, the Client and ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. waive all rights against each other and against contractors, consultants, agents and employees of the other for damages, but Only to the extent covered by property insurance during construdim, except such rights as They may have to the proceeds of such insurance. Client and AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. each shall require similar waivers from their contractors, consultants and agents. 23. WARRANTY AND AUTHORITY TO SIGN The person signing this contact warrants they have authority to sign as, on behalf of, the client for whom or for whom benefit that Engineels services are rendered. If such person does not have such authority, he agrees that he Is personally liable for all breaches of this contract and Mat in any action against him for breach of such warranty a reasonably attorney fee shall be included In any judgment rendered. 24. INDEMINFICAT[ON The ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the Client and lts officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustamed or Costs incurred to the extent caused by AWANT ENGINEERINGS breach d the cmtract or other fault by AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. 25. INSURANCE prior to commencement Of work by AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. or Re agents, AWANT ENGINEERING, INC. shall provide Client with evidence of liability and property damage insurance coverage covering adivities under this Agreement, with limits of not less than as follows which Insurance shall name Client as an additional insured: Workers Compensation — Statutory Employers Liability- $100,000.00 Automobile Liability Bodily Injury - 3250,000.00/person $500,000.00/occurrence property Damage - $100,000.00/mcumence Comperhensive General Liability - $1,000,000.00 26. SAFETY PROGRAM ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. represents to the Client that A has In place a Safety program that conforms with the Workplace Accident B Injury Reduction Act, Minnesota Statute 182.653 and that work performed on The property will be in accordance with the Program. 27. INCONSISTENT LANGUAGE To the exten that the language in paragraphs 24 thru 26 above Is inconsistent with the balance of language contained in this contract, the language contained in paragraphs 24 thru 26 shall control. Dated: 1/l/2007 Page 2 of Project No.:07000.0 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Adam Peterson <adam@klardig.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12A7 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Nye Addition (1641 W. 63rd St.) Subdivision and Variance Hello Sharmeen AI-Jaaf, I am writing regarding this proposed development that keeps rearing its head... I live at 1661 Wood Duck Lane, and we bought our home because it was on a Cul-de-sac, why do we as a homeowner have to lose this value to our home so someone can build on a poorly broken out property. I have 2 young children who ride bikes, fly kites, play soccer and basketball out there all the time, and I hate to think of all the construction equipment driving by. I just had our home painted, and who will pay for repainting after all the dust is kicked up from digging/grading/trucks hauling dirt in front of my home? That's why I left Minneapolis. I watched this with the McDonald development of Pheasant Hills Park. Construction debris blown all over the place, materials left haphazardly in piles, and no concern for the roadways covered in muck and mud as they enter and exit the site. It is still a mess over there even though more than half the homes are occupied. The property for sale has access, and that should remain the access going forward. Developers can try to by the 2 smaller properties adjacent to the lot on the east for future development, but they sure don't need to backdoor via my quite street. I heard talk of a large retaining wall being built into the hill, does that mean I can't let my kids just run outside and play for fear someone is going to climb this and potentially fall? I know of a couple of shared driveways in our area and see no reason why this property couldn't be developed the same way. Thank you, Adam Peterson Project Manager �� KID "Construction services that suit you" Direct 612.260.5757 1 Mobile 612.327.69211 Fax 612.260.5754 1 klardig.com Klar Dig Construction, Inc. 1 632 Mendelssohn Ave. N. I Minneapolis, MN 55427 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Ken Ashfeld <KAshfeld@maplegrovemn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 8:22 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Cc: Ken Ashfeld Subject: Nye Addition Sharmeen, Thank you for the opportunity to comment relative to the proposed Nye Addition, which is adjacent and north of the property owned by myself and my wife, Barb Ashfeld. Please accept these comments and extend same to the Chanhassen Planning Commission and City Council as you deem appropriate. I can't guarantee my attendance at the Planning Commission meeting but if you think it important that I attend, please let me know. Firstly, let me state that being new to the community, I am stating what I understand to be factual from what I have heard from neighbors, the applicant and other prospective buyers of the Nye property. We have enjoyed the couple years that we have been here, enjoyed the open spaces and the excellent planning that is exemplative of the City of Chanhassen. Obviously, you and the city staff, Planning Commission and City Council have been at creating a great city for a long time, and it shows. However, we live on a large acreage parcel which takes a lot of upkeep and adding new neighbors would be welcomed. It is my understanding that it has been the goal of the City to extend Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite for a long time. That appears obvious from the design of the Pheasant Hill development with limited access and extensive truncated streets, inclusive of Wood Duck Lane. I believe the long term planning of the area is sound, assuming that it was feasible to extend Wood Duck to Yosemite. The extension of Wood Duck would facilitate the public safety needs of the Pheasant Hill neighborhood. The current property owners adjacent to Wood Duck, at Yosemite, has indicated to a previous potential buyer of the Nye property that their expectations for compensation for additional right of way makes the extension of Wood Duck unfeasible if only the Nye property and our property is responsible for the cost of acquisition and building all the infrastructure. We do not care to be an obstructionist to the objectives of the Nye family but from my view of the proposal, and if approved, the objective of extending Wood Duck Lane is no longer possible. Although it is admirable that they are comprehending the needed right of way from their property, there remains an encumbered right of way extending east to Yosemite. There would no longer be a need or desire for the Nye property to want to extend the roadway. From my understanding, it has been envisioned that our property could create three additional lots and from my 42 years of City planning and engineering, I would concur. Having said that, the three lots would incur the cost of single sided benefit, which most developers attempt to avoid, and certainly could not take on the cost of right of way acquisition and the extension of Wood Duck. Essentially, Wood Duck Lane would forever remain a very long truncated roadway causing the overall master plan to not be realized and resulting in lack of public safety access to the Pheasant Hill neighborhood, which is the fundamental principle of urban planning. It is not my nature to point out a problem without offering a potential solution. Our access currently consists of a private drive under approval and agreement with the City. The ongoing maintenance and snow removal is recognized to be our responsibility. It is, my suggestion that if the City wishes to approve the Nye Addition, it is also memorialized that our property could subdivide under a PUD process whereby four lots would have access via a private drive over the existing right of way, reconstructed to City PUD private drive standards. In effect, the existing 33 foot right of way would support a 20 foot drive. The four parcels would be encumbered with a Reciprocal Operating Agreement "RDA" filed as a covenant on the properties to required the administrator of the ROA, myself and successors, to maintain the drive to the acceptance of the City or, if in breach of contract, allow the City to maintain with costs special assessed to the four properties with right of appeal waived. Furthermore, a paved connection to Wood Duck Lane would be constructed to provide access for public safety vehicles and bicycles/pedestrians from the Pheasant Hill to Yosemite. I believe this would accomplish the objectives of all interested parties, in that: • The Nyes would be afforded what they are requesting. • The City would have public safety access that doesn't currently exist, and probably never will. • Current residents along Yosemite are not required to lose property to additional right of way. • The Pheasant Hill neighborhood would have bicycle/pedestrian access to Yosemite and safer access to downtown Excelsior without having to navigate Highway 7 and busy intersections. • It is my understanding that the Pheasant Hill neighborhood is opposed to extending Wood Duck Lane for vehicular traffic. • Provide development potential for our property. Without some solution to reasonable access, our property is being denied the ability to subdivide that all properties surrounding us have enjoyed. The properties involved present a very difficult planning scenario and although not wanting to be a critic of the overall planning, the end result is our property becomes deprived and is not able to be in compliance with the comprehensive plan for the area. I realize that it is unfair to present all of this to the Planning Commission and City Council without a specific proposal from us. This has all come on so quick and differently than what I was led to believe and expected. I only wish to state that the approval of the Nye Addition closes the option of extending Wood Duck Lane without financial contributions from the City and exercise the right of eminent domain to acquire additional right of way. Our property will simply remain a large acreage parcel with a single residence. Being new to the community doesn't mean that I am new to the issues created by development. Sharmeen, you, the Planning Commission and City Council take on a difficult task on a daily basis planning for the creation of a vibrant community. You have all succeeded! If I can answer any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at my office at 763-494-6351(direct) or cell at 612-581- 8716. Ken Ken Ashfeld 6480 Yosemite Excelsior, MN 55331 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Tricia DeVries <TriciaDeVries@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 5:52 PM To: Public Comments - Plan Commission Subject: Re: application for subdivision approval of Nye property (Planning Case No. 2020-06) Members of the City of Chanhassen Planning Commission, My name is Tricia DeVries, and I live at 1681 West 63rd Street. My property is adjacent to Ann Nye's property on the north. I am in support of the subdivision being requested by Ann Nye and her representative Woody Love because it seems to be very reasonable with minimal impact on both neighborhoods involved. After reviewing all of the documents, petitions and comments that are posted on the city's website, however, it came to my attention that quite a few signatures on the Preserve Wood Duck Circle petition are made by individuals who do not reside in the Wood Duck neighborhood. In fact, there are names on the petition of people who don't even reside in the state of Minnesota. I believe that the voices that should be considered by the city in making decisions should be those who are directly affected by those decisions. I appreciate the diligence and effort you are making to balance the desires of the community with the rights of property owners. Thank you for your service in making the city of Chanhassen a great place to live! Sincerely, Tricia DeVries 1. Call the meeting to order 2. Introduce New Planning Commission members a. Eric Noyes - take a few moments to introduce your self b. Mark Von Oven — take a few moments to introduce your self 3. I would like to review the guidelines for this meeting. This is our first attempt at this, so I ask for everyone's patience. No Commission member will be holding chats or discussions on the side through the ZOOM application- all discussion will be made public. 4. There are two Public Hearings on tonight's agenda. The items will be presented as follows: a. Staff will present the item b. Ask for any comments from the Planning Commission c. The applicant will be asked if they want to make any comments d. Open the Public Hearing i. All emails will be summarized and read for the record ii. In person comment will be take in the Council Chamber social distancing will be practiced iii. Telephone calls will be taken the phone number will appear on the screen when the time open for public comment iv. Close the Public Hearing e. Ask for any comments from the Planning Commission f. Ask for a motion g. Ask for a second h. Take a roll call vote Introduce the first item on the agenda AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Tricia DeVries <TriciaDeVries@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 5:52 PM To: Public Comments - Plan Commission Subject: Re: application for subdivision approval of Nye property (Planning Case No. 2020-06) Members of the City of Chanhassen Planning Commission, My name is Tricia DeVries, and I live at 1681 West 63rd Street. My property is adjacent to Ann Nye's property on the north. I am in support of the subdivision being requested by Ann Nye and her representative Woody Love because it seems to be very reasonable with minimal impact on both neighborhoods involved. After reviewing all of the documents, petitions and comments that are posted on the city's website, however, it came to my attention that quite a few signatures on the Preserve Wood Duck Circle petition are made by individuals who do not reside in the Wood Duck neighborhood. In fact, there are names on the petition of people who don't even reside in the state of Minnesota. I believe that the voices that should be considered by the city in making decisions should be those who are directly affected by those decisions. I appreciate the diligence and effort you are making to balance the desires of the community with the rights of property owners. Thank you for your service in making the city of Chanhassen a great place to live! Sincerely, Tricia DeVries PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to subdivide 6.4 acres into two lots and one outlot as shown in plans dated March 27, 2020, subject to conditions and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision Recommendation." 11 Background Pheasant Hi1141h Addition 6480 Yosemite Ai enue 1611 6Jrd street On April 20, 1987, the City Council approved the final plat for Pheasant Hill 4tn Addition. The Wood Duck Lane connection to Yosemite Avenue was discussed at length (see attachment #7). The intent was to: Help disperse the traffic between Wood Duck Lane and 631d Street by providing an additional access point into the Pheasant Hill subdivision. This connection would also help provide future access to 6480 Yosemite Avenue and allow it to potentially subdivide. Allow 1611 631d Street to potentially subdivide. The measured distance from Lake Lucy Road to the end of Wood Duck Lane is 1900 feet. This is of concern to emergency management responders. Wood Duck Lane ended in a temporary cul-de-sac. Due to lack of a feasibility study, adequate right-of-way and cost, the connection was postponed. Staff located a feasibility study for the improvement of Yosemite Avenue. The Wood Duck Lane connection was not included in the study. 12 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Adam Peterson <adam@klardig.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 2:54 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Re: Nye Addition (1641 W. 63rd St.) Subdivision and Variance Hello Sharmeen, I appreciate you sending this information. It is very unfortunate that there are 4 Cul-de-sacs in this area and adding another home adds to additional services needing maintenance by the city. Aside of the fact that is precisely why we bought our home on a Cul-de-sac. More roadway to repair, fire department service, and services that in some regards are sub par especially fiber/coax and especially safety for walking. I would hope that would be more of a priority than adding additional homes to fit the needs of real estate goals. Take this commonly used walkway on Galpin for instance, let alone the 7 walking from our neighborhood. Concern with connecting Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite • Through traffic • Keep the neighborhood as is Concern with additional traffic on West 63' Use access off of 631 • Opportunity to reduce traffic on 63'd street by introducing a 2nd connection out of the neighborhood Since the staff report was sent out, we received an e-mail in support of the request as it stands. It also points out that there are signatures on the preserve wood duck petition that were not members of the community. Private street to serve 6480 Yosemite Concern with connecting Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite • Through traffic • Keep the neighborhood as is Concern with additional traffic on West 631 Use access off of 631 Opportunity to reduce traffic on 631 street by introducing a 211 connection out of the neighborhood Since the staff report was sent out, we received an e-mail in support of the request as it stands. It also points out that there are signatures on the preserve wood duck petition that were not members of the community. Private street to serve 6480 Yosemite AGENDA CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, MAY 5, 2020, 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD B. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Consider a Request to Amend the PUD at 7801 Audubon Road (Paisley Park) 2. Consider a Request for Approval of the Subdivision of 6.4 Acres into Two Single - Family lots with Variances for Property Located at 1641 W. 63rd Street (Nye Addition) C. NEW BUSINESS Election of Chair and Vice -Chair 2. Adoption of Bylaws 117�\77;7g1'ai u1 ZL110M Approval of Planning Commission Minutes dated February 18, 2020 E. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS City Council Action Update E ADJOURNMENT NOTE: Planning Commission meetings are scheduled to end by 10:30 p.m. as outlined in the official by-laws. We will make every attempt to complete the hearing for each item on the agenda. If, however, this does not appear to he possible, the Chairperson will notify those present and offer rescheduling options. Items thus pulled from consideration will be listed first on the agenda at the next Commission meeting. If a constituent or resident sends an email to staff or the Planning Commission, it must he made part of the public record based on State Statute. If a constituent or resident sends an email to the Mayor and City Council, it is up to each individual City Council member and Mayor if they want it to be made part of the public record or not. There is no State Statute that forces the Mayor or City Council to share that information with the public or be made part of the public record. Under State Statute, staff cannot remove comments or letters provided as part of the public input process. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, May 5, 2020 Subject Consider a Request for Approval of the Subdivision of 6.4 Acres into Two Single -Family Lots with Variances for Property Located at 1641 W. 63rd Street (Nye Addition) Section PUBLIC FIEARINGS Item No: B.2. Prepared By Sharmeen AI-]aff, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 2020-06 PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to subdivide 6.4 acres into two lots and one outlet as shown in plans dated March 27, 2020, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the Findings of Fact and Decision Recommendation. SUMMARY OF RFOLIECI Subdivision of 6.4 acres into two lots and one outlot. APPLICANT Woody Love, Engel & Volkers, 18202 Minnetonka Boulevard, Deephaven, MN, Ann Nye. 1641 W. 63rd Street, Excelsior, MN SITE INFORMATION PRESENT ZONING: Single -Family Residential Low Density, RSF LAND USE: Residential Low Density (1.24.0 units/net acre) ACREAGE: 6A acres DENSITY: 0.3 units per acre APPLICATION REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Sec. 18-57. - Streets Sec. 18-60. - Lots(f) Chapter 20, Article XII, RSF District BACKGROUND On April 20, 1987. the City Council approved the final plat for Pheasant Hill 4th Addition. The Wood Duck Lane connection to Yosemite Avenue was discussed at length. The intent was to: • Help disperse the traffic between Wood Duck Lane and 63rd Street by providing an additional access point into the Pheasant Hill Subdivision. • This connection would also help provide future access to 6480 Yosemite Avenue and allow it to potentially subdivide. • Allow 1611 63rd Street to potentially subdivide. • The measured distance from Lake Lucy Road to the end of Wood Duck Lane is 1900 feet. This is of concern to emergency management responders. • Wood Duck Lane ended in a temporary cul-de-sac. Due to lack of a feasibility study, adequate right-of-way and cost, the connection was postponed. Staff located a feasibility study for the improvement of Yosemite Avenue. The Wood Duck Lane connection was not included in the study. RECOMMENDATION The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to subdivide 6.4 acres into two lots and one outlot as shown on plans dated March 27. 2020. subject to the conditions in the staff report and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Staff Report ❑ Findings of Fact and Recommendation ❑ Development Review Application ❑ Preliminary Plat Sheets dated March 27, 2020 ❑ Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing List ❑ Petition - Nye Development 63rd Street ❑ Petition - Save Wood Duck Lane ❑ City Council Minutes dated April20. 1987. ❑ E-mail from Adam Peterson dated April 28, 2020 ❑ E-mail from Woody Love Regarding the 60-day Timeline ❑ E-mail from Ken Ashfeld dated April 28, 2020 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: PC DATE: May 5, 2020 CC DATE: May 26, 2020 REVIEW DEADLINE: June 2, 2020 CASE #: 2020-06 BY: SJ, ET, EH, TH, JS "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to subdivide 6.4 acres into two lots and one outlot as shown in plans dated March 27, 2020, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the Findings of Fact and Decision Recommendation." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivision of 6.4 acres into two lots and one outlot. LOCATION: 1641 W. 63rd Street, North of Wood Duck Lane and south of West 63rd Street. APPLICANT: Woody Love Engel & Volkers 18202 Minnetonka Boulevard Deephaven, MN 55391 woody&woodylove.com 612-695-3001 PRESENT ZONING: Single - Family Residential District, RSF 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (1.2 — 4.0 units/net acre) ACREAGE: 6.4 acres DENSITY: 0.3 units per acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The city's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. PROPERTY OWNER: Ann Nye 1641 W. 631a Street Excelsior, MN 55331 annnye n,a.com Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Planning Commission Nye Addition May 5, 2020 Page 2 of 12 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Sec. 18-57. - Streets Sec. 18-60. - Lots(f) Chapter 20, Article XII, RSF District PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting to subdivide 6.4 acres into two lots and one outlot for single-family detached housing. The property is located south of 63`d Street and north of Wood Duck Lane. Access to Lot 1 is gained off of 63`d Street and access to Lot 2 is proposed via an existing cul-de- sac off of Wood Duck Lane. Sewer and water are available to the site. The property is zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF) and contains four wetlands. °"D 63nd Street .� V Lot 1 r YJ Lot 2' BLOCK I ; 0i: Out of A *wswma Planning Commission Nye Addition May 5, 2020 Page 3 of 12 BACKGROUND On April 20, 1987, the City Council approved the final plat for Pheasant Hill 41' Addition. The Wood Duck Lane connection to Yosemite Avenue was discussed at length (see attachment #7). The intent was to: • Help disperse the traffic between Wood Duck Lane and 63rd Street by providing an additional access point into the Pheasant Hill subdivision. • This connection would also help provide future access to 6480 Yosemite Avenue and allow it to potentially subdivide. • Allow 1611 63`d Street to potentially subdivide. • The measured distance from Lake Lucy Road to the end of Wood Duck Lane is 1900 feet. This is of concern to emergency management responders. • Wood Duck Lane ended in a temporary cul-de-sac. Due to lack of a feasibility study, adequate right-of-way and cost, the connection was postponed. Staff located a feasibility study for the improvement of Yosemite Avenue. The Wood Duck Lane connection was not included in the study. Card St W 63rd St 1611 63rd Street Pheasant Hill 4th Addition 6480 Yosemite Avenue Planning Commission Nye Addition May 5, 2020 Page 4 of 12 SUBDIVISION The applicant is proposing to subdivide 6.4 acres into two lots and one outlot for single-family detached housing. The property is located south of 631 Street and north of Wood Duck Lane. Access to Lot 1 is gained off of 63`d Street and it contains an existing single-family home with a detached garage and a shed. Access to Lot 2 is proposed via an existing cul-de-sac off of Wood Duck Lane. Lot 2 will house a future single-family home. Lot 2 has an existing accessory structure. The City Code requires the construction of the primary structure prior to the accessory structure. This subdivision will create a nonconforming situation. Staff is recommending an escrow of 110% of the estimated removal cost be posted with the city prior to recording of the final plat. The accessory structure must be removed within four months of the approval of the final plat. Sewer and water are available to the site. The property is zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF) and contains four wetlands. All of the proposed lots meet the minimum area, width and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. MD 63`d Street Lot 1 ll Lott A' BLOCK 1 Outlot AI:o7 ; �c Outlot A contains a wetland and is intended to be deeded to the city. The applicant is also dedicating right-of-way to the city for the possible future extension of Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite Avenue. Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. Planning Commission Nye Addition May 5, 2020 Page 5 of 12 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY The applicant has provided an existing conditions and boundary survey that generally meets the requirements of City Ordinance Sec. 1840. The survey identified private fencing that is located in public right-of-way and crossing property lines. Any private fencing that extends into or from adjacent properties into the proposed subdivision, or private fencing that extends into public right-of-way, shall be removed with continued coordination with the affected property owners. Also, a well was identified on the provided survey. As both lots will have water services via public water mains, this well shall be abandoned in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health's review and regulations. Furthermore, all required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be obtained prior to the commencement of any abandonment. EASEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY The applicant is proposing standard drainage and utility easements (D&U) for the neighborhood around each lot on the proposed plat, which generally includes six feet on side and rear lot lines and ten feet on front lot lines. Per City Ordinance, standard D&U's are five feet on side and rear lot lines; the additional one foot is consistent with the surrounding subdivisions and staff has no concerns with the additional dedication. The proposed plat illustrates a dedication of public right-of-way for the possible future extension of Wood Duck Lane. The dedicated portion of public right-of-way will be adequate to achieve a consistent 50-foot wide right-of-way throughout the corridor. While 50 feet is not the city's standard right-of-way width, it will be consistent with the surrounding right-of-ways such as 63`a Street W. to the north and Wood Duck Lane to the south (also 50 feet wide) and is all that is necessary to improve the future street, which is heavily constrained by private properties. The applicant has proposed the dedication of Outlot A to the city, which would encompass the delineated wetland in its entirety. Staff recommends extending the boundaries of Outlot A to incorporate the wetland buffer. This will require a 6-foot D&U abutting Outlot A's new boundary line rather than the proposed 24-foot D&U. The proposed plat should be adjusted accordingly. STREETS The proposed subdivision has frontage on both 63`a Street W. to the north and Wood Duck Lane to the south. Lot 1 will maintain the existing connection to 63'd Street W. and the newly created Lot 2 will connect to existing Wood Duck Lane right-of-way. The applicant is proposing to reconstruct the temporary cul-de-sac at the end of Wood Duck Lane to bring it into conformance with city standards and city ordinances. The temporary cul-de-sac standard from city Detail Plate #520513 requires a diameter of 70 feet. The cul-de-sac is located in an area with significant grade change to the north and one existing access to the south from 1641 Wood Duck Lane and thus the applicant has proposed a modified temporary cul-de-sac from Detail Plate #5205B. After review by staff, the proposed modification is generally acceptable as it meets the intent of Detail Plate #520513 while maintaining access to 1641 Wood Duck Lane for when the street is extended in the future. Due to the substantial grades to the north, the applicant proposes to Planning Commission Nye Addition May 5, 2020 Page 6 of 12 regrade to achieve a 2:1 grade; if a retaining wall is required, all walls exceeding 4' in height shall be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer and shall be constructed of a durable material (smooth face concrete/poured in place, masonry/mortared, railroad ties and timber are prohibited). GRADING & DRAINAGE The applicant is proposing minimal grading for the subdivision. The preliminary grading plans indicate that drainage will be routed away from the proposed new housing pad on Lot 2 and maximum driveway grades are to be maintained at 3.71/o, which is in accordance with city ordinances. Additional grading, discussed previously under "Streets", is required to reconstruct the existing cul-de-sac at the end of Wood Duck Lane. Due to the grades and relative scope of impact, the public improvements and the site grading on Lot 2 are likely to occur simultaneously. This approach has been reviewed by staff and is acceptable as proposed. EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL The proposed development will not exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, not be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). However, an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) in adherence with the City Code of Ordinances shall be submitted for the grading operations of the subdivision as more than 5,000 square feet of land is being disturbed. This ESCP shall be a stand-alone document that must include the requirements listed under City Code of Ordinances Sec.19-145. WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER The proposed subdivision has access to public sanitary sewer and water mains that are located within abutting right-of-ways. The existing home on Lot 1 currently has active sanitary sewer and water services from the mains located within 63`d Street W. right-of-way to the north. The applicant is proposing to maintain those services. However, Lot 2 will require new services to be tapped from the sanitary sewer and water mains located through Wood Duck Lane right-of-way to the south. This will require the developer to extend the existing public sanitary sewer main within Wood Duck Lane right-of-way to the east, approximately 150 lineal feet. The applicant has shown within the preliminary plans the feasibility of this extension and the general conformity to city Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Prior to extending the sanitary sewer main, the existing manhole in which the extension is to occur (MH 04-110) shall be inspected to ensure it is in good condition and is up to city standards. Any required repairs will be the responsibility of the developer. This extended public sanitary sewer main shall be owned and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvement by the City Council. The developer's contractor shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with Engineering and Public Works Utilities prior to the commencement of any work to the sanitary sewer main extension. Planning Commission Nye Addition May 5, 2020 Page 7 of 12 WETLANDS The wetland located on Lot 2 was delineated by Alliant Engineering, Inc. in the Fall of 2019. The delineation and classification was approved by the city. As discussed previously, the applicant is proposing to dedicate Outlot A to the city, which fully encompasses the 2019 delineated wetland located on Lot 2. There are additional wetlands within the subdivision, located in the western portion of Lot 1, however these wetlands have already been covered by drainage and utility easements back in 2006, and are to be maintained. The applicant is proposing no impacts to the wetlands on either Lot 1 or 2. All requirements of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District regarding wetland buffers shall be adhered to. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of the City Code describes the required stormwater management development standards. Section 19-141 states that `these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features." Furthermore, all conditions, comments, and applicable permits required by Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District shall be adhered to. STORMWATER UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGES Section 4-30 of the City Code sets out the fees associated with surface water management. A water quality and water quantity fee are collected with a subdivision. These fees are based on land use type and are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the degradation of surface water. This fee will be applied to the new lot of record being created. It is calculated as shown in the table below: SURFACE WATER DEVELOPMENT FEE AREA PER ACRE FEE ACRES FEE GROSS AREA $8,490 0.831 $ 7,055.19 OUTLOT A $8,490 0.336 $ 2,852.64 ROW $8,490 0.123 $ 1,044.27 NET AREA 0.372 $ 3,158.28 ASSESSMENTS Water and sewer partial hookups are due at the time of final plat. The partial hookup fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time. The remaining partial hookups fees are due with the building permit. FEES Based on the proposal, the following fees would be collected with the development contract: Planning Commission Nye Addition May 5, 2020 Page 8 of 12 a) Administration Fee: If the improvement costs are between $500,000 and $1,000,000, 2% of the improvement costs. If the improvement costs exceed $1,000,000, 2.5% of the first $1,000,000 plus 1.5%of the remainder. b) Surface Water Management Fee: $3,158.28 c) A portion of the water hook-up charge: $2,392.00/unit d) A portion of the sanitary sewer hook-up charge: $691.00/unit e) Park Dedication Fee: $5,800.00 f) GIS fees: $25 for the plat plus $10 per parcel LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION The applicant for the Nye Addition has submitted tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations. They are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands): 5.45 ac. or 237,794 SF Baseline canopy coverage: 44% or 105,761 SF Minimum canopy coverage required: 35% or 83,227 SF Proposed tree preservation: 39% or 95,113 SF The developer meets minimum canopy coverage for the site. A minimum of one tree is required to be planted in the front yard of the new home as required by ordinance. COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN The city's comprehensive park plan calls for a neighborhood park to be located within one-half mile of every residence in the city. Nye Addition is located within one-half mile of both Curry Farms Park and Pheasant Hill Park. These two neighborhood park locations offer ample amenities for those residing in the Nye Addition. COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN City trails located within both Curry Farms Park and Pheasant Hill Park and adjacent to Lake Lucy Road provide convenient trail connections for both recreation and transportation. Planning Commission Nye Addition May 5, 2020 Page 9 of 12 COMPLIANCE TABLE Lot Area Lot Lot Setbacks s . ft. Width Depth Front/Rear: 30 feet Code (RSF) 15,000 90 125 Side: 10 feet Wetland: 50 feet (30-foot setback + 20-foot permanent buffer Lot 1 221,390 500 359 Lot 2 36,196 299 192 Outlot A 15,951 Ri ht-of-Wa 5,371 Total 278,909 SUBDIVISION - FINDINGS The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. Finding: The subdivision meets all of the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single - Family District, and the Zoning Ordinance if the private street variance is approved. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Subdivision Ordinance. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development. Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report. 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter. Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to the conditions of approval. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. Planning Commission Nye Addition May 5, 2020 Page 10 of 12 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. C. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to subdivide 6.4 acres into two lots and one outlot as shown in plans dated March 27, 2020, subject to the following conditions and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision Recommendation: SUBDIVISION Engineering: 1. Private fencing extending into the public right-of-way or into the proposed subdivision shall be removed. Continued coordination with all affected property owners shall be the responsibility of the developer. 2. The developer shall abandon all existing wells in accordance with all federal, state and local regulatory agencies' standards, and obtain all necessary permits for said abandonments prior to building permits being issued. Prior to commencement of abandonment activities, a copy of all required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the city. 3. The applicant shall dedicate public right-of-way adequate for a 50-foot wide corridor for the possible future extension of Wood Duck Lane prior to recording of final plat. 4. Outlot A shall encompass the delineated wetland and also encompass the appropriate buffer determined by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed prior to recording of final plat. 5. The developer shall reconstruct the temporary cul-de-sac located at the end of Wood Duck Lane in accordance with city Standard Specifications and Detail Plates, subject to Planning Commission Nye Addition May 5, 2020 Page 11 of 12 review and approval by the city. The extension shall be owned and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 6. All retaining walls exceeding 4' in height shall have plans and details prepared by a registered engineer prior to issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 7. The developer shall extend the existing public sanitary sewer main within Wood Duck Lane right-of-way. All extended sanitary sewer mains shall be public sanitary sewer mains, owned and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. S. The developer or their contractor shall schedule an inspection of the existing manhole in which the extension is to be had from (MH 04-110) to ensure it is in good condition and meets city standards. Any required repairs will be the responsibility of the developer. 9. The developer's contractor shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with Engineering and Public Works Utilities prior to the commencement of any work to the sanitary sewer main extension. 10. All conditions, comments, and applicable permits required by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District shall be adhered to. Parks: 1. Full park fees in lieu of parkland dedication and/or trail construction are collected. The Park fees shall be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. At today's rate, these fees would total $5,800 (1 lot x $5,800 per lot) for the one new lot without an existing home. Environmental Resources Coordinator: 1. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the edge of grading limits prior to any construction activities. Building Official: 1. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site. 2. A building permit/plans must be submitted and approved prior to construction. 3. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4. Separate sewer and water services must be provided for each lot. Planning Commission Nye Addition May 5, 2020 Page 12 of 12 Plannine: 1. An escrow of 110% of the estimated removal cost of the existing accessory structure on Lot 2 shall be posted with the city prior to recording of the final plat. The accessory structure must be removed within four months of the approval of the final plat. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation Decision. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Preliminary Plat Sheets dated March 27, 2020. 4. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing List. 5. Neighborhood Petition regarding "Nye Development_63rd Street". 6. Petition to "Save Wood Duck Lane". 7. City Council Minutes dated April 20, 1987. 8. E-mail from Adam Peterson dated April 28, 2020. 9. E-mail from Woody Love regarding the 60-day deadline dated March 27, 2020. 10. E-mail from Ken Ashfeld dated April 29, 2020. giplan12020 planning cases\20-06 nye addition sub and vat\stafr report preliminary.docx CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION RMITM Application of Nye Addition for Subdivision approval. On May 5, 2020, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Nye Addition for preliminary plat approval of property into two lots and one outlot. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential - RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Elan for Low Density Residential. 3. The legal description of the property is: ee Attached Exhibit A 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single - Family District and the zoning ordinance if the conditions of approval are met. b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city s comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and subdivision ordinance if the conditions of approval are met. c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report. d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision will provide adequate urban infrastructure subject to the conditions specified in this report. e. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: Plat. 1) Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets if the specified conditions of approval are met. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 50' day of May, 2020. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION OW Steven Weick g:\plan\2020 planning c s\20-06 nye addition sub and var\findings of fwt.dmx &~Wa^1D. 96EVFWF-1D 441224d I,3147C5D39EM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen. MN 55317 Phone: (952)227-1300iFax: (952)227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT ( Review REVIEW ! 1 Submittal Date: � a / I �C' of PC Date S_�- �=' CC Date. S c�-C 6C-Day Date: w eL If c,+ Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply) (Refer to the appropriate Appication Checkhst for required submittal Information that must accompany this application; ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ S325 ❑ All Others........................................................ $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit ([UP) ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Rezoning (REZ) ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD).................. $750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD................. $100 ❑ All Others .... ._..................._.......................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review .................................................. S150 ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Administrative..................................................S100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts* ...................... $500 Plus S10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: ( thousand square feet) 'Include number of exisbn employees: 'Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts ......................................... S500 Plus S5 per dwelling unit ( units) Subdivision (SUB) Z Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot ( lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots) ........................ .......... $300 ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 Final Plat.. ........ ............................................... $700 ( Includes S450 escrow for attorney costs)' 'Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ S300 iAdddional recording fees may apply) ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... S200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... S150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... S275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... S100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. S500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ZNotification Sign (City to install and rem, ow) ... ..................... ..............__...................._.............................._........._.......... S200 ❑� Property Owners' List within 500' (city to generate after pre -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address ( 89 addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply).....................................................................S50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements ( easements) ❑ Deeds TOTAL FEE: $1.467.00 section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Requesting approval to subdivide 1 existing residential parcel into 2 single family residential lots. Property Address or Location: Parcel #: 254150012 Legal Description: 1641 63rd St W Lot 3, Block 1. Lenvilla Estates. Carver County, Minnesota Total Acreage: 6.40 Wetlands Present? Yes ❑ No Present Zoning: Single -Family Residential District (RSF) Requested Zoning: Single -Family Residential District (RSF) Present Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Requested Land Use Designation Residential Low Density Existing Use of Property: 1 Single Family Residence ❑� Check box if separate narrative is attached. A�Uwp ID. seeorsF'ea.41 n-ASCs nnesoaea. Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner. I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Engel & Volkers Contact: Woody Love Address: 18202 Minnetonka Blvd, Ste 100 Phone: (612) 695-3001 City/State/Zip: Deephaven. MN. 55391 Cell: Email: A h, „ woody@woodylove.com Fax: W004zRie Signature: Date: 1^ 52020!' -2 00 N = PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application. I, as property owner. have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees. feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Ann Nye - Trustee Contact: Ann Nye Address: 1641 63rd St. W Phone: City/State/Zip: Chanhassen. MN. 55331 Cell: Email: Aohem .' annnye@q.com Fax: Signature: Qnn'AueJutet Date: This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before fling this application. refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Alliant Engineering, Inc. Contact: Mark Bausch Address: 733 Marquette Ave Ste. 700 Phone: (612) 758-3080 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN. 55402 Cell: Email: mrausch@alliant-inc.com Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: ❑� Property Owner Via: 0 Email 0 Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑+ Applicant Via: 0 Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑� Engineer Via: 0 Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: []Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital Copy to the City for processing. '', SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMfT FORM NYE ADDITION NYE ADDITION L-------- 63No +ter STPEET — . � r— �..____,--_.__ ipe III it i I JIt •. � ili i i R it f JIL. ,I, i IL a 1 it itII III III L i __ J_JIL_L 'Ire a " •- �' :'.: m`t�. r'r' E ..�. �� ___" S T A 1< S '� OU CT �ir:.��r•�� F r/:\• %EASANT •� ;111 %.�I ��. . may, r�--.•�.� .. `xdoo wocwc -Aou.,w.. r. NxLe ITN AM ON — u: I\ ly a JjI / /���------- � AuuwT Clsclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one This map is a compilation of recordsinformation and data located in various city county state and federal DIl and other sources regarding the area shown and is to be used for reference purposes only The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigattonaltracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or prmsion m the depiction of geographic features The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466 03 Subd 21 (2000) and the user of this map acknowledges mat the City shall not be liable for any damagesand expressly waives all cams and agrees to defend indemnity. and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User Is employees or agents or third parties which Anse out of the users access or use of cars provioed This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is na intended to oe used as one Trills map is a compilation of records information and data located in various city. county sate and federal ofifRs and other sources regarding the area shown and is to be used for reference purposes only The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIST Data used to prepare this map are error free and the Gay does not represent mat the GIS Data can be used for navigai tracking or any other purpose requmng exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in me depiction of geographic features The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §46603 Subd 21 (2000) and the user of this map acknowledges that me City shall not be liable for any damages and expressly wanes all claims and agrees to defend indemnity, and hob harmless me CM from any and all claims brought by User its employees or agents or thud parties which anse out of the users access or use of data provided aTAX_NAMEa eTAX_ADD_L1» aTAX ADD L2a *Next RecordtlaTAX NAMEa «TAX_ADD_L1• aTAX_ADD_L2a, CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) 1. Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly swom. on oath deposes that she is and was on April 23, 2020. the duh qualified and acting Depute Clerk of the Cite of Chanhassen. Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public hearing to consider a request for approval for the subdivision of 6.4 acres into t%o single- famih lots with variances for property located at 1641 Ni. 63rd Street (Nye Addition); Zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF), Planning Case File No. 2020-06 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A". by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner. and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon: that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer. Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and s 'om to before me thiQ da% of .2020. A�U* m 1 ��Sa�L�ItCLi i�� Kim t. Meuwissen. Depu _"-rk (Seal) Notary Publi BEAN M STECKLING by R&10_ krw�trte wW+"gra 31.sm. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, May 52020 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, dependingon the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Consider a request for approval for the subdivision of 6.4 acres Proposal: into two single-family lots with variances for property located at 1641 W. 63r0 Street (Nye Addition). Zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF). Applicant: Woody Love Engel & Volkers Property Owner: Ann Nye Property 1641 W. 63r4 Street Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following What Happens steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2020-06. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff by Questions & email at SAI-Jalf0ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952-227- Comments: 1134. If you choose to submit written comments, please send one copy to staff in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. _ NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's websits. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notityme to sign upt city Rsvlow Procedure: • Suhoiwbionb Planned Ual D Neffa men/. St. Plan Reviews Ciaskaonsl and IMean Uses. Wtellstd AXaralronaRazaee.. enls ml Code Aendm. repair. a public M1aamq before onePlarmnM mg Common CXy Cnrnprehe'bwa Plan AmerbmaAmendment. nldmanoe> require all property w hain 600 Not of IM1e sutyed life to be notified of Was appnralmn in wohn, My inlweebd pony is nvued Ice Wait IM nazi • Staff prepiea a Na 0 on IM contact application oral encloses Ar Pwimant information and a r«omen abml Those reporU ere vadMb by request At Iho Piannmp Cmnmibmal d a i staff will give a verbal overview W the report arq a necoaaaandal Ise item will lee opened la the putdrt to .peak about Iho prapowl to a pan W IM1e hoenrg mooese TM Cmgmumor, will close the public warna, and dscu>s the item and make a recgnlmendal,vl to the City Couool TM City Conool may handles affirm m hoiden, wholly w pool, Pre Via nning CommaYion s racommandid. Retuning. IarN use and!cIXb amendownt, tape a vmPM initi vote W tho City Cnuncl e•upt ratonmgs Plod hood, use obeffountenb from o ardential to t abo sroathand al • Minnesota Slate Statute 519"obi ail appbcaiian to he mgoeead within 60 days unless Iho Ywa,are all IMY'Nodard Soren appb<ahons are to their c,ompli may table eeswM monMY m onmplee Any potion whoa,, to follow an item through the protects shoals Check with ha Planning napadrm,t regardap do flatus and! e[hodulirlg IIX the COY Cooli assed- lg YpokesparsmaractrV nlebisancaaogt to iamowdsa��macfor the�a . Aiolwit with an, mode with Men i to toy'",o the molestwnhtiny iandany parson/./ nanN,rnaA ropardnlgndrpropose Sleff rea,C av ad C. ere lateen and any • flawuee nw Planmrlp Commission hWJs Iho public Ileanrxi IM City Cwwlcil d»s not Mmif curtespondence legordmg IM1e appnce will ni m IM report to Coy Counul X you w.en to hove wmelhrrlp Ice bq y th ,ndutled m Iho ropon, pbeae vented Ilia Ptenn tip SIeX named on XIs rwtiLalmn as g Shelf pension Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start later In the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: _until City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Consider a request for approval for the subdivision of 6.4 acres into two single-family lots with variances for property located at Proposal: Pia 1641 W. 63'O Street (Nye Addition). Zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF). Applicant -Woody Love Engel & Volkers property Owner: Nye Property _Ann 1641 W. 63rd Street Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following What Happens steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. _ If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at www.el.chanhasson.mn.us/2020-06 If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff by Questions & email at SAI-Jalf(a)a Chanhassen.ri or by phone at 952-227- Comments: 1134. If you choose to submit written comments, please send one copy to staff in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWT Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City NM•w Procadi . Subdrvoions. Planted Uat Develora dnb, Sue Plan Rovlowa Cood ayall and Imanm Uses. WellaM AXaraions. Rezoning., Commatxlnsive Plen Amerldmmnls aide GnM Amehomente rpuaa • patio M1earlrp before Xla PleMatp CommteRon City ordnanmct requre all mopeny wdM1m G00 feel W na wblacl cote to ho nontwd of Iho epPlrulmn rn wrlhrp Arty Irdwostad party is ,nvited to attend the meeting -y nl ineartal n tide a 1 the ai and stoos roPmts are . Stan prepared a report oil IeP sutq... Contralion nal a .., tit NI .If 1-ye. ailabte by rapuasl At nP Planning Canmiswon meeinp YIeX Will gins a natal ovemew OI the rePod tide a recommeMelion 1 rev item wJl ba opAled In IM pltllnao epee. maul Ind M Wnsal a> a pan W Ilb neanng pocen TM Commusmn will dose IM1e fwhorq and Ile item arld ineke a racxmmNiWalral In Iho Gly Clnmetl Tna and Cmmnl may reval>e or a Yimpla i Ow 6 rn d8limi RBSMilfoo I.M tint ci ,... madily violet/, p Partly Ira Planningon (: Nadi anitadhod , ropo>inn land n d on s n., halms/, tole of St CiIt Council Pe orerelunirps and I.M he tl mesa ath., , idenlial to n. ap,1 cixni anion,' ireY all wroth fA days the atpbcoll waw.b his th he Ored, • Minnesota Stale Statute S19., rough to c tsoll a to /idols en slam through n0 meY lax' .everai mmnlbY n complete My par Woe oho naryli . of Some 91 oue 11Nn ComPle CO, paid.. snhoo [nqU corn Ind Plenrnrq Delladrtgnl repardmg iN >lalus arM>crredulirg for the Can Cnuncl me Shoup! Ch it D encouraged to • q npplbortlmtl sookesper.aNe{xeasMafive ,e encouraged la maid' a contact tie city DllwL daob{mr. ita l sle , meal with Ise nerghborMgtl rrrgardng Ihmr moposel SIeX rs a1.9 avdilade b review IIx p¢ryerl wnh any inlmxped Pmsonlsl • H.r,e a the Planning Cannalson 11.16, the mrbl¢. had,,, In. COY Cams Mee 1.1 Minula, on, taken .foil ally npr.espmitlerra rnperdmp Xre appnsation will Ite rncluWo m Ilw reWn la hie Clty Counul If You wish in havx sonwthnlg b a mduded in IM1e rvlxPt plaa>a toto,l in, Plxnnuly Stall lrurvan nelmn on the noliliwlion _ PIN TAX -NAME TAX_ADD_Ll TAX_ADD_1.2 SITEADD 256030280 JOSEPH 1 SCHIMML 10946 LEXINGTON DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344- 1751 PHEASANT CIR 254150041 IRENE TRICK 141 CHONG ZHONG RD ZUOYING DIS 1621 63RD ST W 252540090 NOAH J HANSEN 1541 CREEK RUN TRL EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-6500 1541 CREEK RUN TRL 257970020 JASON A LEPAGE 1610 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1610 63RD ST W 259050011 JAY MEYER 1611 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9001 1611 63RD ST W 257970010 AARON N MAKI 1616 W 63RD ST EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9002 1616 63RD ST W 256710120 CHRISTINE ANN BURY 1620 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9002 1620 63RD ST W 256710110 SOLUM AND CULLEN REV TRUST 1630 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9056 1630 63RD ST W 254150040 AMY EBERT HAGGERTY 1631 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1631 63RD ST W 2541SO012 ANN NYE REV TRUST 1641 63RD 5T W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9001 264163RD ST W 259500080 ADELE M PINT 1641 KOEHNEN CIR E EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9015 1641 KOEHNEN CIR E 256070220 DESIREE ZIMMERMAN 1641 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1641 WOOD DUCK LN 256710100 WILLARD & SHIRLEY A JOHNSON 1660 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9056 1660 63RD ST W 254150011 YUNSHA HE 1661 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9001 1661 63RD ST W 256070210 ADAM JOHN PETERSON 1661 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1661 WOOD DUCK LN 256070200 MICHAEL T & LYSSA L CAMPBELL 1671 PINTAIL CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9098 1671 PINTAIL CIR 2541SO010 TRUST AGREEMENT OF ROBERT & PATRICIA DEV 1681 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9001 1681 63RD ST W 256070190 PHILIP C & MARGARET A MARSTON 1681 PINTAIL CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9098 1681 PINTAIL CIR 250032500 BETH M MASTEL 1690 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9056 1690 63RD ST W 256070120 ROBERT A & LINDA M GUNDERSEN 1690 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9093 1690 WOOD DUCK LN 258500090 KELLY CASSIDY 1691 KOEHNEN CIR E EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9015 1691 KOEHNEN CIR E 256070110 BART T & ANNETTE R ELLSON 1700 TEAL CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9097 1700 TEAL CIR 256070170 NEIL R & KATHLEEN CAULEY 1701 PINTAIL CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-3100 1701 PINTAIL CIR 256960020 VIJAY VENKATARAMAN 1710 TEAL CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9097 1710 TEAL CIR 258500100 JUDY K FORD TRUST 1711 KOEHNEN CIR E EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9050 1711 KOEHNEN CIR E 256070160 SHERYL K LARSON 1711 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9076 1711 WOOD DUCK LN 256070090 PAUL ORVIS TWENGE 1720 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9077 1720 WOOD DUCK LN 256960010 SUKO BUDIJONO 1721 WOOD DUCK CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9096 1721 WOOD DUCK CIR 256070150 NICHOLAS J WALSTROM 1721 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9076 1721 WOOD DUCK LN 250032100 DAVID W & DENISE K GERTEN 1730 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9004 1730 63RD ST W 256070050 MICHAEL A & KERRY K PUZAK 1730 WOOD DUCK CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9096 1730 WOOD DUCK CIR 256070070 BREE JORGENSON 1731 WOOD DUCK CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9096 1731 WOOD DUCK CIR 256070140 DAVID W & HOLLY A JUDD 1731 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9076 1731 WOOD DUCK LN 256030270 LOREN R NELSON 1740 PHEASANT CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9060 1740 PHEASANT CIR 256070040 THOMAS S MAPLE III 1740 WOOD DUCK CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9096 1740 WOOD DUCK CIR 256070080 KYLE J & BETH A DUCHSCHE RE 1741 WOOD DUCK CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9096 1741 WOOD DUCK CIR 256070130 AMIT RAHMAN 1741 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1741 WOOD DUCK LN 256030170 DUANE F & LORI P ANDERSON 1750 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9064 1750 RINGNECK DR 256070030 PAMELA A HUDSON 1750 WOOD DUCK CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9096 1750 WOOD DUCK CIR 256030190 EUGENE GARVEY 1751 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331.9066 1751 RINGNECK DR 256030260 LEE R & MARCELLA A PETERSON JT LIVING TR 1760 PHEASANT CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9060 1760 PHEASANT CIR 256030160 PETER A NOWLING 1760 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1760 RINGNECK DR 256070020 MICHAEL L PIPER 1760 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9095 1760 WOOD DUCK LN 256030290 MICHAEL & BEVERLY 1 MOSHIER 1761 PHEASANT CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9060 1761 PHEASANT CIR 256030200 SCOTT D LAVOLD 1761 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9066 1761 RINGNECK DR 256030250 KEITH R & AMBER K BUTCHER 2770 PHEASANT CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9060 1770 PHEASANT CIR 256030150 DENNIS & SUSAN PIPAL 1770 RINGNECK OR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9064 1770 RINGNECK DR 256030300 THOMAS & KRISTINE STEINKAMP 1771 PHEASANT CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9060 1771 PHEASANT CIR 256030210 MARK D & KAREN F LEWIS 1771 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN SS331-9066 1771 RINGNECK DR 25310N91 KEITH A HAMBERG 1779 KOEHNEN CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9051 1779 KOEHNEN CIR 253100030 DOUGLAS & SHERRY SWANSON 1780 KOEHNEN CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9049 1780 KOEHNEN CIR 250033100 DAVID & SHERRL HUGHES 1790 LAKE LUCY RD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9025 1780 LAKE LUCY RD 256030240 DANIEL F & SALLY J GABLER 1780 PHEASANT CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9060 1780 PHEASANT CIR 256030140 JACQUELINE RAE SNYDER 1790 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9064 1780 RINGNECK DR 256070010 JENNIFER N LILLA 1780 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1780 WOOD DUCK LN 256030220 AARON DAVID VANT 1781 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1781 RINGNECK DR 253100090 PATRICK L & STACY L WARD 1789 KOEHNEN CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331.9051 1789 KOEHNEN CIR 256030130 KRISTIN J MCMURTRY AND JOHN B MCMURTRY R 1790 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1790 RINGNECK DR 256030230 STEVE & D KAREN SOUDBASH 1791 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9071 1791 RINGNECK DR 25310OD70 IVAN CHIHANG LEE 17" KOEHNEN CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1799 KOEHNEN CIR 256070180 HOME PARTNERS GA 2015 LLC 180 N STETSON AVE STE 3650 CHICAGO, IL 60601 1691 PINTAIL CIR 256030090 SARAH S BROWNE 1800 PHEASANT DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9072 19M PHEASANT DR 256030120 TODD 1 & LESLIE K PEDERSEN 1800 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9064 1800 RINGNECK DR 253100090 TIMOTHY G & EUNICE C SWANSON 1901 KOEHNEN CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9051 1801 KOEHNEN CIR 256030100 SCHWARZINGER TRUST 1820 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1820 RINGNECK DR 256710070 BRUCE D & SUSAN K KOEHNEN 1830 KOEHNEN CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9049 6271 BLUE JAY CIR 256040240 TIMOTHY EDWARD CARLSON 1941 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1841 RINGNECK DR 256040190 JESSE JOHN BERTOGLIAT 1870 PARTRIDGE CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9075 1870 PARTRIDGE CIR 256710080 THOMAS D & ERICA R KOEHNEN 5810 DIVISION ST UNIT UPPR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-3221 6280 AUDUBON CIR 250031700 ANDREA M DONOVAN 6251 CARDINAL AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9047 6251 CARDINAL AVE 256710030 CONNIE JO JENSEN 6270 BLUE JAY CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9008 6270 BLUE JAY CIR 256710020 KATELYN M PETERSON 6271 CARDINAL AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9047 6271 CARDINAL AVE 256710140 BARRY JOHN CONDA 6285 AUDUBON CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9000 6285 AUDUBON CIR 256710090 ELISE M KVNG 6290 AUDUBON CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9007 6290 AUDUBON CIR 256710040 CAROLE J BIRCH 6290 BLUE JAY CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9008 6290 BLUE JAY CIR 256030180 KEITH J & MICHELLE M O'BRIEN 6290 CARDINAL AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9046 6290 CARDINAL AVE 256710060 BRETT PALMBERG 6291 BLUE JAY CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 6291 BLUE JAY CIR 256710010 DENNIS R OLDS 6291 CARDINAL AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9047 6291 CARDINAL AVE 256710130 ANTHONY) & GLORIANN SCHWARTZ 6295 AUDUBON CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331.9007 6295 AUDUBON CIR 250032200 GENE R & SHARONI TEW5 6300 CARDINAL AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9011 6300 CARDINAL AVE 250024300 )AMIE DALE 6320 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 6320 YOSEMITE AVE 257970030 JOEL P & MELISSA 1 EICHERS 6340 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9034 6340 YOSEMITE AVE 250023700 HERBERT F & LEOIA M CLASEN 6351 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9044 6351 YOSEMITE AVE 250023500 TODD D BOGEMA 6371 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9044 6371 YOSEMITE AVE 250023200 HUE & CATHERINE I LAM JT REV LVG TRST 6401 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9036 6401 YOSEMITE AVE 250023300 CHARLES B HEBERT 6411 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9036 6411 YOSEMITE AVE 258050020 SCOTT L HENRY 642D YOSEMITE AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9037 6420 YOSEMITE AVE 259050030 VICTORIA ANNE SIMPSON 6430 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9037 6430 YOSEMITE AVE 250022700 DONALD M & CAROL OELKE 6431 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9036 6431 YOSEMITE AVE 256850010 MICHAEL RISHAVY 6440 YOSEMITE AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9037 6440 YOSEMITE AVE 250022500 DAVID L PETERSON 6451 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9036 6451 YOSEMITE AVE 256850030 MARK R RANDALL 6460 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9037 6460 YOSEMITE AVE 256950040 KATHRYN J BERSCHEIT 6470 YOSEMITE AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9037 6470 YOSEMITE AVE 250033500 KENNETH ASHFELD 6480 YOSE MITE AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 6480 YOSEMITE AVE 257860010 RYAN WILLIAM YANKOUPE 6481 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9036 6481 YOSEMITE AVE 256850050 SUSAN JORGENSEN 6510 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9038 6510 YOSEMITE AVE 256710050 ROBERT L & CELINE A DEPAUW REV TRUST PO BOX 250 SAINT BONIFACIUS, MN 55375-0250 1702 63RD ST W Date: October 10, 2019 To: Chanhassen City Council Planning Commission From: West 631 Street Neighborhood Subject: Petition Regarding Potential Development of 1641 West 63rd Street The West 63rd Street neighbors would like any potential development of the property at 1641 West 63rd Street to maintain the character of the neighborhood by keeping home density to a minimum. Although we recognize the right of property owners to sell and develop their land, we are concerned with the scope and impact that a potential development of Nye's property at 1641 West 63rd Street could have on the West 63rd Street neighborhood, especially in relation to the following: A. Access to any potential development; and B. Potential demolition of the wooded areas on the property. A.)The West 63rd Street neighborhood respectfully requests that access to any potential development that consists of more than 2 homes be from Yosemite Avenue or from Wood Duck Lane and not from West 63rd Street due to the following concerns: 1) West 63rd Street is already a heavily traveled street with confirmed traffic coming from Audubon Circle, Blue Jay Circle, Cardinal Avenue, Ringneck Drive and Lake Lucy Road, as well as vehicles that take West 631 Street to cut through to Galpin Boulevard and to Highway 7. (Please see attached map.) In fact, in 2018 the city denied the West 631 Street neighborhood's request to hold the annual neighborhood National Night Out/ Night to Unite gathering on West 63rd Street for safety reasons due to the large amount of traffic that exists on this road. Both the congestion and speed of traffic are also a safety hazard for the many young children that currently live on West 631 Street. 2) If access to a new development is allowed from West 63`d Street, the additional homeowners' cars, visitors' vehicles, garbage trucks, delivery trucks, and school buses would add to the heavy traffic load that already exists on West 63' Street. Development of the property at 1641 West 63rd Street would be the perfect opportunity to decrease the traffic congestion that currently exists on West 631 Street. 3) The current driveway for the Nye's property is unsuitable to become an access road for a potential development of more than two homes due to significant safety concerns. First, the intersection of Audubon Circle and West 631 Street is just a few feet from Nye's driveway. Second, Nye's driveway, the intersection of West 63,d Street with Audubon Circle, and the driveway of 1630 West 63rd Street all sit within feet of each other at the top of a hill. Access at the top of this hill is already dangerous due to the poor visibility of high speed traffic coming from both directions. Turning Nye's residential driveway into an access road for a potential development will create an increased risk of accidents. 4) The Nye's driveway on West 63rd Street is also unsuitable for an access road because the headlights of the large number of vehicles that would be coming and going to a potential development would shine directly into the windows of 1630 West 63rd Street. There would also be a risk of vehicles sliding into the residence at 1630 West 63rd Street from such an access road during the winter because of the significant slope from the Nye property to the street. 5) During the slippery conditions of winter, traveling eastbound on West 63rd Street is dangerous due to the steep downward slope toward the intersection with Yosemite Avenue. Additional traffic coming and going on West 63rd Street creates an increased risk for accidents. 6) West 63rd Street is considered a "residential" street at 31 feet wide from curb to curb, versus a "collector" road like Yosemite Avenue which is 36 feet wide from curb to curb. As a "collector" road, Yosemite Avenue is better suited to handle the heavy construction vehicles and equipment that will be coming and going during development. 7) In 2003 Barbara Solum, owner of 1630 West 63rd Street, was told that City of Chanhassen staff would recommend that access to any future development of Nye's property would not be through West 63rd Street, but rather through Yosemite Avenue for emergency management purposes. 8) The parcel of Nye's property facing West 63rd Street would create a perfect 100-foot lot for a single-family home because it would be of comparable size to all of the other lots on West 63rd Street and because all utilities would be accessible to this potential lot, creating ease in hook-ups. B.) Our second concern is the significant impact that a potential development of 1641 West 631 Street could have on the wooded area behind the home at 1681 West 63'" Street. The neighbors on West 63rd Street chose to live on this street rather than in a new development due to the character of the neighborhood with its wooded areas and mature trees. Although trees may be considered a "renewable resource," their destruction completely transforms the nature of the neighborhood, removing much of its charm and character, for decades. In conclusion, we respectfully request that the city direct access to any potential development of the property at 1641 West 631 Street that consists of more than two homes to be from the south. We also respectfully request that the city protect the woods on the developable portions of the property. Thank you, The neighborhood of West 6311 Street 01) f 3% -61CZ. ,�- rp1 2�n23/ 5�33 �SS3� �Y02�S/J1 �iC � S h �o..rZ.�Ni ��Go ��'+JG�c_k ►J/'.�'%�lSior� I"1N �37j W S-rwi s30 ti3O� oa,...�ia , :dal 4S- mac, l 1711 t-:�,,�c�k f L xt, g4 4 F c r� J—rc 11 • 1 r A w Petition to Save Wood Duck Lane Excelsior MN 55331 . ^1mrsim. ,1 ► or �► i ' #•'' ; ' I ' fit. 'tt t � t► 39 have signed. Let's get to 1001. Pheasant Hill Neighborhood started this petition to ttttighbM The purpose of this petition is to prevent opening up Wood Duck Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 cul-de-sac to a through street to Yosemite or 63rd, to prevent new construction homes to be built on the cul-de-sac of Wood Duck Lane and to prevent the removal of our neighborhood green space. We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who strongly urge our city not to allow the opening of Wood [Tick Lane into a through street, and to keep it the way it is, and has been, since its development in the 1980s, where our families can gather. ride bikes, walk dogs and play safely, without the concern of unnecessary traffic. Updates Keep your supporters engaged with a news update. Every update you post will be sent as a separate email to signers of your petition. Post an upiLte l . I month ago 25 supporters 2. 1 month ago Pheasant Hill Neighborhood started this petition Reasons for signing Please enter a comment. We were unable to post your comment. Please try again. change.org Pheasant Neighborhood Signatures Name Location Date Kerry Worth Excelsior, MN 2019-06-28 Lucia Jorgenson Excelsior, US 2019-06-28 Adam Jorgenson Excelsior, US 2019-06-28 Annemarie Hanlon Eagan, US 2019-06-28 jessica kazemba Hopkins, US 2019-06-28 Mary Ann Walstrom Minneapolis, US 2019-06-28 Angel Kallies Excelsior, US 2019-06-28 Eileen Piper 1760 Wood Duck Lane, Excelsior, US 2019-06-28 Adam Peterson Excelsior, US 2019-06-28 JJ Kelly Excelsior, US 2019-06-28 Renee Walstrom Chanhassen, US 2019-06-29 Nancy Hannan Prior Lake, US 2019-06-29 Katelyn Macaulay Hopkins, US 2019-06-29 Kelly Brown Brown Maple Grove, US 2019-06-29 Erika Youngstrom Minneapolis, MN 2019-06-29 Brandon Weiser Saint Paul, US 2019-06-29 Theodore Tegen Excelsior, US 2019-06-29 Cindy Florek Chanhassen, US 2019-06-29 Sam Ashkar Saint Paul, US 2019-06-29 Kim Frye Eden prairie, US 2019-06-29 Name Location Date Rob jenewein Saint paul, US 2019-06-29 Chelsea Breza-Berndt Minneapolis, US 2019-06-29 Courtney Minton Chanhassen, US 2019-06-29 E= Kenneth Zimmerman Irv11 a olis, US 2019-06-29 Tim Carlson Chanhassen, US 2019-06-29 Chris Pelletier Wayzata, US 2019-06-29 Joelle McGovern Duluth, US 2019-06-30 Jodie Ehnes Duluth, US 2019-06-30 Chelsea Piekarski Minneapolis, US 2019-06-30 Tata Faber Edina, US 2019-06-30 Misty Rapp Minnesota 2019-07-01 Liz Manning Chanhassen, US 2019-07-01 C �1a�ylaSSQ'1/1 Aaron Daeges 'DeRue\r, US 2019-07-01 David Wagner Northfield, US 2019-07-01 Ashley Harville Saint Paul, US 2019-07-01 Vijay Venkataraman Excelsior, MN 2019-07-04 Katie Komaridis St Paul, US 2019-07-06 Rea Long Jamestown, US 2019-07-09 Robert Florek Excelsior, US 2019-07-24 Petition to Save Wood Duck Lane The purpose of this petition is to prevent opening up the Wood Duck Lane cul-de-sac to a through street to Yosemite or 63rd, to prevent new construction hones to be built on the cul-de-sac of Wood Duck Lane and to prevent the removal of our neighborhood green space. We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who strongly urge our city not to allow the opening of Wood Duck Lane into a through street, and to keep it the way it is, and has been, since its development in the 1980's, where our families can gather, ride bikes, walk dogs and play safely, without the concern of unnecessary traffic. Printed Name 11 2�t� Signature � 1 I 11�11Q Address �lol elA)017�1(l c L 0 Date 1 (o�lol t�1 Comm nt WnOT� Qtn(k L1�1� C I 4-2o w eed Duck [a I,^ cds+ Mw 55331 (0 ILO Vjj O .� Gluk av+'P �awitee.fJ•x NOY Caty 1e t 7 Z O GV LJu lJ o �IE6 C Yr�'1 N op f< Cds,-C, Iki 3 / 173t wVc-'3 ✓3U_Ll'_lh Ne�%� s `1 �' VIYJ ��✓ U ( 04— VW-t C4 I'I ry 1'7011 PtOail Clr. - c 33 O ICI ` Ke-e-() gh ho• ke Y\ / j_� A- Due{—' 64 r v Puma AA4 t DNA G (r l S �I l kaN1101 r'yCL4 S I � M n11 (17 I � 0 t � (V1 rltR IW K.Xr� my 01^O' � f�`^-QC�10 qq yy Ilii- WaISiN,� 1121 W44 �K[�[�,,r AN 5�3I ppyffcxUh I a I"1 V Ja 177-1 wado �,4� p /U PO �� I1 ttQ Wq�S 11 1 o G aS �Ue ve�u ro C La Jug �u Ler / e vv 0. lam/ L�t,Q.Pa� ��• Excals�w MN SS7,4) (0( /� 00 tti rv, Gu Ad Q..vl u Je a v a �w�s�s Ia -v nrMW Ic�9Qe� L ✓ 6 174o ck �s ¢iSrO 33r /`/ P st /tevC s/j-Scc 011Jrat fe,tec6c j661 W004 Avt.K Imne /0 bl�/ �e Move LAV`rne �eMSa��Qt i sl wh,+t D+i p� —.j S ' Da Not C N" 4- we A a1 " $1 r'�llR�CE KtR��nl y aysf wn[-E v-c oz %//o(2d/ lif 0 vor CaVAtcl J�CiI-Cr Si�fF,yC/ �G;nr.c.GC Ivor [ 1 VA C05Dl h,H orI r/ C aY rnn 553'1 (o I ;n F.waC 41\m K. p �rr C +11^I� P50 /-i Itj hCtE- a-)( .. ILxLeC �r mn / flek io qa el5a^ /75a�1[rN N[ ��331 /o�l(J/ZUl PJ�i �Ta✓a/d�f{,co �r Esu[_ s .452v w1 �i` dove, C` 1 N /ro �Zu/y N_ ' n vev o 61 549 L+A (CC tJC AS— r A LA) 7���,1 / [/ l lG 19 ua e A ii Petition to Save Wood Duck Lane The purpose of this petition is to prevent opening up the Wood Duck Lane cul-de-sac to a through street to Yosemite or 63rd, to prevent new construction homes to be built on the cul-de-sac of Wood Duck Lane and to prevent the removal of our neighborhood green space. We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who strongly urge our city not to allow the opening of Wood Duck Lane into a through street, and to keep it the way it is, and has been, since its development in the 1980's, where our families can gather, ride bikes, walk dogs and play safely, without the concern of unnecessary traffic. Printed Name ^, Signatu a Address VJ�� Date elr�li�►68 ComnRent F l) Zos — acr M 4ndLe" <i,/dr-"7 el Y u v 5 ��,� I Cr G n Sw, b 20 I :-cep rt as rt GS c.l, t. 7 j lsea r1 IMs Xd lit cA4. ;s 44, .> lrv( sOt" k�e&7 th" OVI�L 1.f) M3 i It &A., Ckfn c1/ IH I n�+ n UP iyh Chris ��u., �off'� �A,\ 4K d Petition to Save Wood Duck Lane The purpose of this petition is to prevent opening up the Wood Duck Lane cul-de-sac to a through street to Yosemite or 63", to prevent new construction homes to be built on the cul-de-sac of Wood Duck Lane and to prevent the removal of our neighborhood green space. We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who strongly urge our city not to allow the opening of Wood Duck Lane into a through street, and to keep it the way it is, and has been, since its development in the 1980's, where our families can gather, ride bikes, walk dogs and play safely, without the concern of unnecessary traffic. Printed Name � ` � Lvi �L(,r}wr[cyti�s, Signature Address Date lf� • � Z �q Comment --- � a«�.-�-- I �-10 Te4.Q �� LSS3�t w \�� N6L y �Ij wi�ir Ayn _e�12 k�4IUMcuI 4 11I0 rea 6 M'j S5.s-31 ' 0 O 31 c�2- +1 h o� SC , b 823�Cl lua (2��Ig I to q 2 3 c 1 c land to 2 l ` u/%ae C �2� o S is U (t C-Y-- _j110� I ,,"�p a v�eubvcc b I -lick der c IL 1�`�( i chi q z z y 1, rn U Ir►r �__aAn CD.\(A2r l 88y p mm 5 I �I o-L,V- -e Y- cafy6) we � 21 1J a� i o _ ►S� J . ► 0 A\ 13 .0 �1� ( OVA (►rl iC ..q D 1► z& e .) IN) Ov 2( k 2Q i Ket tV\ o%-*-) N u, K4321Z�ovyk �" �i �i c�.. a (fie 0 21Z aUR �R✓ VC,,- — L Ll`u r }rIP �IIS�Iy 4lI KJI rc 1e_ 96Z ,Ssho, 2I VI�MAJ�1� ta1C� " I I ill �11 e Y9 2 ri'Sh �w�r 5 0✓ Is I I,� ( I �2 5PIC4,.LF CAPS �1Y l5 5cu�✓v Cofy1 SW v--y a 01 _ AOZ 9 r ►, -{eve rvr�` SW, ya2y :;\d5evt11r Ica � G 22G City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 Doug Roper: Why is that? ' Mayor Hamilton: Should we assess the area then to purchase the lot? I guess that would be the question. Where do we find the money to do that? Doug Roper: How big an area? Mayor Hamilton: I don't know. I'm not going to get into that but that would be the only way we could purchase it. Doug Roper: Well, I think that should be explored. You admit you made a mistake, I think you should explore ways of rectifying your mistake. Councilman Johnson moved, Mayor Hamilton seconded to approve the variance to allow Rober Pierce to build a single family home within the wetland setback on Lot 1, Block 1, Piper Ridge with the following conditions: 1. The home shall be granted a 10 foot variance to the front yard setback and shall be located 20 feet from the front yard lot line. 2. The entire drainage and utility easement area on Lot 1 shall be immediately protected with appropriate erosion control as approved by the City Engineer. 3. No construction activity or any alteration to the existing conditions , shall be permitted within the drainage and utility easement. 4. Determine the Ordinary High Water Mark and maintain the lowest floor level 3 feet above the Ordinary High Water Mark and at a minimum elevation of 957. 5. Maintain natural contours as much as feasible. 6. Alternative #2 is the best alternative for placement on the site. 7. The home be 26 feet in width. All voted in favor except Councilman Geving and motion carried. Councilman Horn: Just for the record, I believe that the record shows that the only opposition to the previous motion was Councilwoman Watson. PHEASANT HILL 4TH ADDITION, TOM KLINGELHUTZ: A. WOOD DUCK LANE STREET CONNECTION. B. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM C. APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Barbara Dacy: The first item that's on the agenda is the street connection issue for Wood Duck Lane from the development to Yosemite Avenue. I, unfortunately have to start out my staff report with an apology. Included in 24 r 221 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 ' e Council's packet was a letter that I sent to the neighboring homeowners in tonight. If you read the letter you the area regarding the Council meeting could infer that the applicant, Mr. Klingelhutz, is proposing the connection to Yosemite Avenue. That is not true. Mr. Klingelhutz has never proposed a connection of Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite Avenue. This item is being brought in front of the Council as a request from City Staff to clarify the original motion that was made in 1984 so I apologize to the developer. This is a City Staff initiated item for consideration. There are a number of reason why we made this decision to have it on the agenda tonight and the first one was that in reviewing the Minutes, there seemed to be a lot of discussion about the traffic issues. People along Yosemite and people along 63rd Street. Since that time, the subdivision is building up. Traffic patterns are occurring. Lake Lucy Road has now changed it's alignment and it is now currently being improved and as the Council recalls it is not a cul-de-sac or will be in the process of being a cul-de-sac and Wood Duck Lane connection. During the Council's discussion, there was also debate as to whether or not there should be a decision made on the connection or if we should wait and see and consider it when the final phase of the 4th Addition of the Pheasant Hills Subdivision comes through. In any case, the motion that was reflected in the Minutes appeared to have said that Wood Duck Lane should be created as a cul-de-sac at that time so again, Staff is asking for clarification and also asking the Council to look at the possibility of extending Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite Avenue. What I would like to go through is some of the existing conditions about the connection. Where the eastern boundary of the property right now abuts Mr. Lyon's property on the east. The old Keenan farm which is not owned by Mr. and Mrs. Nye on the north. The ownership of the parcel is kind of a handle leg type of situation that extends to the east and Mr. Klingelhutz has ownership of 16 1/2 feet over to Yosemite Avenue. The Stoddard Addition subdivision in the southwest corner of 63rd Street and Yosemite was approved approximately 2 years ago. It created 4 lots. The southwestern lot of that, there was a platting restriction filed saying that lot is not buildable until utilities and street access is brought to it. As part of that plat, there was 16 1/2 foot easement reserved as a part of the Stoddard Addition. In that area, for extension to occur, a standard 28 foot width urban street within 33 feet of an easement will be very difficult. There probably will be an additional easement necessary from the Nye property. In summary, the disadvantages to the connection is that there is going to be easement acquisition from adjacent property owners and I know they are here tonight and I know some are in opposition of the extension. The advantages that Staff has looked at for the connection was that we have received calls from people on 63rd Street about the amount of traffic that is going into the development. If you look at the area map from the south and east, Yosemite Avenue to 63rd Street is the primary access into the subdivision whereas on the west side, there is Galpin Blvd., Pheasant Drive and now Lake Lucy Road. The Wood Duck Lane connection would help disburse the traffic from the east and south. It wouldn't necessarily remove traffic but it would help disburse it better. Another advantage that we saw was that it would provide street access to the two landlock parcels. That being Mr. Ryan's property and Lot 4 of the Stoddard Addition. Finally, we looked at the cul-de-sac length. I have noted in my report and measured the distance from Lake Lucy Road to the end right ' here and that is approximately 1,700 feet. It could take another interpretation from Ringneck Drive to the err] of the cul-de-sac is about 1,050 W 222 City Council Meeting - April 29, 1987 feet. I prepared the report in the sense that it would act for access for , these properties and I chose the longer interpretation but it is following that they do have access out the xingneck Drive and Pheasant Drive as well. Clarification on how the extension would occur. Who would be assessed? Who would receive benefit and so on? That, as you are all aware, would be conducted through a feasibility study. If the Counci would choose to make the connection, such a feasibility study would have to be authorize to look at how those issues are going to be addressed. Some homeowners like Mr. DeSantis already have frontage onto Yosemite. There could be a question there as to whether or not he is eligible for assessment, etc. so at that point, as far as the street connection issue, that concludes Staffs report. Mayor Hamilton: At this time, I would like to ask if there is anyone here from the public who would wish to make comment. If you do, please come up to the microphone, state your name and address and give us your cornnents please. Harry DeSantis: I live on Yosemite. I got a petition here with 35 names on it and I think the deal that you had approximately 2 1/2 years ago says that it would stop back there at Wood Duck. Now all of a sudden you turn around and change it and then you are going to come down to who is going to take advantage of about three homes. 'that's about all you could build in there and you're going to have to go back in there about two blocks to get a street from Mr. Klingelhutz' road out to Yosemite Avenue. Then out there you got a safety condition. If somebody is coming down Yosemite Avenue and if you're just coming up over the hill and right there, you're going to have a dangerous ' intersection. So I think everybody on Yosemite is very unhappy and I know Mark here, he has a lot of problems on Yosemite Avenue where cars land in his yard. A couple times in the last few years. Outside down and almost in his house so it is a dangerous situation to put a street there. I was wondering who is going to pay for this street. Mayor Hamilton: It hasn't been determined yet. It's something that we would have to look at to see if benefitting properties would be assessed or just how it would be done. Harry DeSantis: That's about it. 'There are a few folks out here who would like to speak on it themselves so I won't take too much of your time. Mayor Hamilton: Harry, your petition is all people who are opposed to the extension of Wood Duck Lane back to Yosemite. Councilman Horn: How many households are represented in this petition? Harry DeSantis: Everybody on Yosemite Avenue and there are 3 or 4 in each family on some of them. They're all voters anyway. Mayor Hamilton: We were just wondering how many families. We don't have a house count of how many homes are there. Harry DeSantis: I could get that. You've got everybody who owns property I more or less is on there. W 223 Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 Charlie Hebert: I live at 6485 Yosemite Avenue. I would just like to state my feelings about the extension. I don't want it. I would just you to state your reasons. Really, for what purpose, why does the City want that road? You already mentioned that you do have access out of this new development down to Lake Lucy and Lake Lucy now is going to become a major road. I walk the area all the time. I know there is access. We don't need the access. In terms of emergency response, police, fire, ambulance to this new development, there is plenty of acres. We don't need another access. It would really detract from our existing neighborhood. I would be looking out a road bisecting Harry's house and Twottles who live right next to him. There would be a road right inbetween two houses that has never been there and it's a little unsettling for me. I don't want to look down a road. I'm expecting a kid here shortly and he's going to be growing up with more traffic in front of the street than I care for already and now there will just be another additional street. I know the neighbors across the street have children and they don't want a street literally in the side of their yard. The safety considerations. The visual impact is negative and I just want to maintain the existing character of my neighborhood. We like it the way it is. We don't want a road going inbetween our neighbors houses. Mark Erlanson: I live at 6510 Yosemite. I'm the one, the cars already come racing down Apple Road that turns into Yosemite and they flip over and end up either in my driveway, my frontyard, the sideyard. It's just to the south of where this proposal is. The road goes from blacktop to gravel and my house is ' after it started in the gravel. I love it but we don't need any more traffic going down there. unless you guys want to help me fix up my yard the next time the cars flip over. We don't need it paved. I love it the way it is but we don't need that much more traffic either with all the paved accesses that already there. u Mike Schmidt: I live on Yosemite also and I think there is plenty enough traffic on the road now the way it is and we don't need another access on that road. Jim vonLorenz: 6371 Yosemite Avenue. I would like to address some other :oncerns. I think safety has been brought up. The speeds. The problems we've had on that road. I've been on there for 17 years on a dirt road up to what we have now. The road is taking a beating. Any more heavy duty trucks hiving in there, it's going to deteriorate even worse. It's already becoming cracked and the surface is being eroded away. If Mr. Rlingelhutz runs his heavy trucks in there another couple years trying to build on that next addition, that road is going to deteriorate down to nothing. Also, we like to walk and jog through that area. Yosemite has very little of any shoulders on it in many areas and we have to step off the road and it's almost straight gown in many cases to get clear of the traffic that's already on there. I can address Harry's problems there. Also the fact, I'm right at the "T" of Yosemite and 63rd. It's going to double the traffic coming by my place. As I sit in my yard and I watch the traffic coming down 63rd to make the turn onto Yosemite, I would say only 2 out of 5 cars stop at the traffic stop sign there and you are going to have the same problem up there on Wood Luck Lane. Besides, Harry has his trees there to keep the dust away from his yard and it's going to be a blind intersection with no street lights. I think it's a 27 224 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 very dangerous situation that could be developed. I called one night when , that car took out the telephone pole just down beyond Harry there and the deputy said he was doing close to 60 mph so it's a serious concern. With headlights coming off those intersections, without the trees there to protect you, you get headlights in your house at all hours of the night. As is on 63rd now, cars miss that intersection. I hear the screeching of tires and they put it in reverse, back up and go back up 63rd. 'these are all serious concerns that I think we all are looking at and hope the Council will give it their consideration. Mr. Twaddle: I live on 6430 right on the corner and I would just like to say I'm against it. I feel one of the reasons we moved in there, I know from the people who have already been there for a while, might not have liked it when we moved in either, but the location and everything is really pretty back there and with another road. I know Tom has a cul-de-sac back there and he wants to keep it and I know the people on 63rd might object to it because of the traffic. They might want to get rid of a few more cars but a cul-de-sac insures 3, 4 or 5 houses and for that many to build one more road, I just don't think it's worth it. Tom Nye: As you can see, I'm somewhat affected as 1,000 feet of my property borders the entire 4th Addition and Tom Klingelhutz has talked to me about this at one point. He said it was his plan on deadending it there and I guess if the City has a good reason to put a street through there, which seems to be ' their intention, whatever they think is the best. However, I would also like to at some point in time be told how, they are going to have to get a little strip of land from me I think to do it and I would just like to be kept abreast of your plans on it. If that's what you want to do. Councilman Johnson.: As I've said in the past, I'm concerned about long cul- de-sacs. Not from convenience of the neighbors but from public safety aspects of having a cul-de-sac blocked during an emergency. How long is this cul-de- sac, Ringneck? Councilman Horn: 1,000 feet. Councilman Johnson: I've heard time and time again that people would prefer to live on a long cul-de-sac like this but at that point when an emergency happens and something happens where they have to escape, we don't have a Williams Pipeline coming through here or anything but that's my only concern for wanting to put it through. I do agree with most of the people on Yosemite as far as it's not an ideal place to put a street out onto Yosemite. I haven't heard anybody from 63rd Street. I was expecting somebody from 63rd Street to be here. Firma St. John: 1621 63rd Street and the reason was for having the traffic come off of 63rd Street and I think it has pointed out something to you from the comments that were made that there is a traffic hazard on 63rd coming onto Yosemite and that is the most concern. ' Councilman Johnson: You are concerned about the traffic on 63rd? 28 r 223 Council meeting - April 29, 1987 nnma St. John: on 63rd. Councilman Johnson: And this connection does what for you or to you? i St. John: It would take some of the traffic off of 63rd but I don't know the speeding on the 63rd, which has been brought up is a problem over e too. Councilman Johnson: So what we're trying to do is relieve 63rd Street for the property owners there. Unfortunately that has the effect of increasing some traffic on Yosemite south of 63rd. People coming from the north. The people coming from the south, I'm trying to see if I have this understood right? No. Clark is shaking his head. Barbara Dacy: If you use 63rd or if you use the Wood Duck Lane connection, you are going to have to use Yosemite one way or the other. Again, it would disburse traffic. It would even out the traffic possibly between 63rd and Wood Duck Land. The Wood Duck Lane connection would provide access into the 4th Addition and probably an area to the west. It's sort of split in there depending on people's travel patterns and so on. Councilman Johnson: Do we have any traffic engineers who have looked at this and have made the best guesstimate of what all the traffic patterns are now and what they would change to be if this connection was made and if it's not? Barbara Dacy: The way we approached it is, the final plat application came in and in reviewing the case we felt that this was an issue that deserved special Council attention so we prepared an analysis albeit greek. We did not take on -site counts as you did on the Frontier Trail because Lake Lucy Road is under construction and evervthina is in disruption as to travel patterns. So to answer your question, no because we felt it was an item that we wanted clarification from the Council on. If there was strong feeling about retaining the cul-de-sac, then that additional study obviously would not be cilman Johnson: Right now we don't really know what the full benefits or full detriment is because we haven't done the total study. Dacy: No. We have not done a traffic study. Councilman Johnson: we would be looking to do a feasibility study that would have that part on it so our action tonight would not delay Tom on his subdivision. He may still get it approved, I can't say what will happen, but this will not affect, we would go ahead with the cul-de-sac for design right now and if we decide to go ahead with the feasibility study, what happens to this cul-de-sac? Barbara Dacy: I think in discussing that with the developer, he can't start on the initial phase of the 4th Addition. As they proceed east however, the timing is going to be critical. But in talking with the applicant, he can start. 29 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 Gary Warren: The most important part right now would be the watermain that is forced through to Yosemite but that would be in the existing easement that is already there. Councilman Johnson: That has to be done anyway. Gary Warren: Right. Harry DeSantis: What about the watermain? Where is it going to go? Gary Warren: The watermain is coming from the west along Wood Duck and go through the existing easement to the east. Harry DeSantis: Down the cartway? Gary Warren: Right. Harry DeSantis: We were the ones who paid and put all that water in there, how can he hook onto our water now? Councilman Johnson: It will actually make your water better. Harry DeSantis: You think so? Councilman Johnson: I won't say better in taste but distribution wise it will improve our water system. Tom Klingelhutz: We do pay for your line per unit charge. Each time we take out a permit we pay the City $650.00 for water so it is being paid for each time we take a permit out. Harry DeSantis: Nobody has been out there but 63rd is half dirt and Yosemite is half dirt. We don't need more traffic on that road. We're living in dirt now. Russ Stoddard: Who pays for that water? It isn't affecting anybody besides the developer if they put water from Yosemite through that road. Mayor Hamilton: The developer pays for it. Councilman Geving: Just a comment or two, I'm curious where this whole issue of extending Wood Duck Trail to Yosemite came from. I generally try to respond to people's requests to do something and I feel in this particular case that we really haven't made a case for extending it other than the fact that we did receive a petition here with about 13 names on it to push it through to Yosemite. At the same time, I've got another petition with approximately three times that number that are in disfavor of it. Now the petition for the people who are in favor of extending Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite all live on 63rd Street and I believe what they're thinking is that it will relieve the traffic on 63rd. I'm not so sure that's really true. I'm , really am not sure that that will happen because the traffic that I see, at least from my sketch, would indicated that those people are going to travel R' r 227 r] ty Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 3rd anyway and they are still going to travel 63rd and pick up Yosemite and o south so I suspect that there isn't a real strong case, at least from my iewpoint, that it's going to reduce the traffic on 63rd. Again, I'm kind of he opinion that we don't have all the information we need in terms of who is oing to benefit if we do extend this. How is it going to be done? How is he assessment going to be accomplished? How are we going to acquire the and to pursue that road because obviously we're not going to get it easily rom the people who are here. So I think it's kind of an initiative that at is present time is best left the way it is. We've cul-de-saced it. We did it when the original plat came in. It seemed to be a reasonable thing to do d until we get a majority of the people in the area there that really desire ind are willing to pay for the assessments of putting in that road, I rsonally can't see us doing that. I'm sensitive usually to people's wishes and I think all the Council members are and in this case, the majority of the people are telling me that they don't need the road extended. That it's better off left just as it is. Until we build up that area and until we get some idea of what the traffic patterns are going to be. I don't know if that 1,700 foot cul-de-sac is such a bad thing. There are several ways out of there and I'm not convinced that we have all the information at this time to make a decision to extend that road. That's the extent of my comment. :ouncilman Horn: First of all, I believe the Minutes that I read said that that was not a permanent cul-de-sac at the end of Wood Duck Lane. As I interpretted the Minutes, that was left for something that would be decided at a later point. As a matter of fact, there were several people on the Council at that time that thought it should not be a cul-de-sac because of the problems that cul-de-sacs can bring. When people see a finished cul-de-sac they tend to feel that it is permanent so it's not clear to me that it was ever decided that that would be a permanent cul-de-sac at that point. That this was something that was left for later decision. Also, it appears to me in looking through here that it's quite obvious that any traffic that went on Wood Duck Lane would be coming off from 63rd Street. It also appears to me that since you only have one way into this development which is Pheasant Drive, which comes off CR 117, I don't believe whether Wood Duck Lane is there or not, it's going to make any difference to anybody coming in on Pheasant Drive which means that all that will happen is people who come in Pheasant Drive will have the option of going on Wood Duck Lane or 63rd Street. So if you assume that is the same amount of traffic that goes through there, Yosemite is going to see the same amount of traffic whether we put this road in or not. The only difference is that the people between 63rd and Wood Duck will see less traffic because some of it will go Wood Duck and head south. Some of it will go 63rd and head north. None of those cars will go past the folks between those two and it seems to me that the real losers in this whole thing, with the exception of the DeSantis property, are the people who in future will be building along Wood Duck Lane. They are the real losers in this whole thing because they are going to have traffic going in front of their homes now that they didn't have before so from their viewpoint, they are going to be the big losers in this. People on 63rd will gain, as I see it. The people north of 63rd on Yosemite, won't see any change. The people south won't see any change. The people in the middle will see a slight improvement and the real losers are going to be Wood Duck Lane. I have some concerns about how this would go through here too and how it would match into Yosemite OR 228 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 but to me that's the bigger issue other than traffic. I think most of the losers haven't bought , a house yet in Chanhassen. Councilman Boyt: I think we have to go into this realizing that Lake Lucy Road stops prior to getting into Wood Duck Lane. Everybody who is out here from the neighborhood agrees with that? Garry Warren: It connects to Wood Duck Lane. Councilman Boyt: okay, so then Clark, I guess there are two ways in there. Mayor Hamilton: There are three ways actually. You can get in and off of CR 117, that Pheasant Drive. You can get in off of Lake Lucy Road onto Wood Duck Lane. You can get in off of 63rd onto Ringneck so there are three entrances. Councilman Boyt: So let me try this again, is it fair to say that with three entrances that that is residential traffic or is that shortcutting traffic? What kind of traffic do you find going through your neighborhood? Does anybody know? Residential traffic for the most part? Barbara Dacy: Yes. Councilman Boyt: Is there a reason why anybody would take that road if they weren't living there? Tom Klingelhutz: No. It's basically residential traffic. , Councilman Boyt: As it's developed, that's what we're looking at so we're looking at how does residential traffic flow through the neighborhood. I think that is one issue. Then what I'm hearing from the people who have spoken is an overwhelming concern that Yosemite is not a safe road. Is that right? What we're talking about is really the distance then between 63rd and what will be Wood Duck Lane as it comes out onto Yosemite. I didn't hear anybody tell me how, since this is residential traffic that's going to impact the traffic flow on Yosemite and I would be interested in our engineer or anyone for that matter could tell me what the impact is going to be on Yosemite of putting one more entrance there. Tom Nye: You're going to put 25 houses back in there, you are bound to get more traffic cutting through there. I agree with you that my land is 200 to 300 feet there along Yosemite, between 63rd and the proposed street. There are no homes there at all. It's not going to impact anybody. The only people that are concerned are the new homes built up toward the DeSantis residence and up in that area a couple three homes but I think when you're bringing the traffic off of Apple Road, up Yosemite to turn into Wood Duck, you're going to have an increased flow and you just can't get away from that. Councilman Boyt: There is going to be increased flow down something when you build 25 more homes. , Tom Nye: It's much easier to come through Excelsiore, take a right on Apple Road to come up the hill. It's been happening. We've been watching. It's 32 229 Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 ' increasing and we're watching it right now. Councilman Boyt: I think what you're telling me is you are acceptable to having more traffic come in along Pheasant Drive off of CR 117 and run through he residential neighborhood. Tom Nye: or Cake Lucy Road. Councilman Boyt: But you're not acceptable to having that traffic come in from Yosemite. Tom Nye: I think it's quite a narrow strip. I tried to point that out to the Council before. Councilman Boyt: I went out and drove this and Jay said he was out there and I suspect maybe some of the other Council members went out to take a look at this on a first hand basis and Yosemite isn't an inviting place to walk. I agree with that. Tom Nye: That's true but we still do love to walk in the neighborhood and a lot of us do. Councilman Boyt: Right. Now, I know first hand the trauma of living on a cul-de-sac that is put through. I find it absolutely amazing that Mr. Geving ' would tell me that he could live with a 1,000 foot cul-de-sac or a 1,700 foot cul-de-sac when it's just been a matter of a few months since the Fire Department lined the back wall and said that that was ridiculous and the Council at that point voted 5-0 to put the cul-de-sac through. Councilman Geving: I won't respond to that. Councilman Boyt: When I look back to 1983 or 1985 or 1984,a few years and look at this, I agree with Mr. Horn that it was never intended that Wood Duck Lane stop where that 4th Addition stops. I see the issue as one of dealing with residential traffic and a difficult situation. I agree with you that putting more traffic on Yosemite is dangerous. I don't see how you are going to put less traffic on Yosemite no matter what you do here. When we add 25 more houses here, we are going to add more traffic someplace and some of that traffic is going to be on Yosemite. I don't see an alternative that says it won't be on Yosemite and I think we do have a concern and I agreed several months ago, we had a concern with how do we get emergency vehicles into a 1,000 foot cul-de-sac that doesn't have a backdoor and those 25 homes or whatever that are going to be built in there, are not going to be happy if they come back in here two years from now to try to extend that road then and they are not going to be as safe if we don't. Did you say 22? okay, 22. Mayor Hamilton: I think pretty near everything has been said that I could possibly say. The only thing that I would like to add to it is Yosemite is of course a very unsafe street and I could see a connection going in there once Yosemite is paved. 'there has been some requests by some of the citizens living there to pave Yosemite and we don't have the funds at the present time. We spent a lot of our msA funds tonight on Hesse Farm Road so when we are back 33 { 230 City Council Meeting - Apri 20, 1987 in a position where we have some funds to spend, I know Yosemite is going to , be one of our high priority roads to look at to pave. It would seem to me that that would be the time to look at making the connection although I think Bill has a very good point when he says, if you do that, if you put it off for a period of 2 to 3 years, the people who are living on Wood Duck Lane and the other cul-de-sacs in that vicinity are then perhaps not going to want the connection to go through because the traffic may increase through their neighborhood. At the same time, everybody wants growth and you like to add to Your tax base to decrease everybody's individual tax burden but nobody wants the traffic. Nobody wants to have a neighbor but it seems if we're going to have development, we also have to have neighbors and we have to have traffic and somehow we have to live with it so it's a difficult issue and I honestly don't recall what decision was made when this thing was discussed in 1984 but I would have to suspect that we did not intend for this road to end permanently in the cul-de-sac at Wood Duck Lane. That it was the intent of the Council at that time to have it go through to Yosemite. Again, it would seem to me that the time to put it through would be when Yosemite is improved. When it's paved and put some curb and gutters in there and you can do the job right. 'Those are my only comments. Councilman Johnson: Has our Fire Department commented on this? I know our new public safety director is pretty fresh. Has this been brought before the Public Safety Commission? Barbara Dacy: No it has not. , Councilman Boyt moved, Mayor Hamilton seconded to table the Wood Duck Lane street connection until a proper traffic study report and the Public Safety Director has had a chance to review it. All voted in favor of tabling the motion and motion carried. PHEASANT HILL 4TH ADDITION: FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. Barbara Dacy: Basically we're recommending approval of the final plat even in dispite of your action on the previous item. We have noted that the area between the cul-de-sac and Yosemite, will still be reserved as public right- of-way to provide access for the utilities that will be going across there and would provide a limited amount of right-of-way for street access for the other parcels in that area so we are recommending approval subject to our standard conditions of submitting the financial security and execution of the development contract. Councilman Boyt: Block 1, Lot 2, it's under 11,700 square feet. Mayor Hamilton: It's 11,392 according to the plat. Councilman Boyt: And I think 11,700 square feet, I'm trying to recall the former Ordinance. Barbara Dacy: The application was processed under the Planned Unit Development Ordinance which has since then been revised but at that time there was not an established minimun standard. There are lot sizes elsewhere 34 r 231 I� ty Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 the development that are below the 11,700. 11,700 came from another part our Subdivision ordinance at that time. It was loosely used as a reference int but what you see there has been approved by the Planning Commission and ancil and in fact, they did drop a lot of those in this particular addition there is no conflict there at this point. Johnson: Is Outlot A, is that a future connection to another Dacy: To the south yes. Johnson: I'm glad to see that. Tom Klingelhutz: We don't own the property to the south but left a place for 9 road but our plan is based on that road. Councilman Johnson: Barbara, is that property to the south, is that all under one ownership all the way down to Lake Lucy or do you know? Tom Klingelhutz: yes, it belongs to a may by the name of Carrico. We didn't bother to tell Mr. Palmer who lives in the house right off Lake Lucy Road but that's not inside the sewer line. Councilman Johnson: So we're not looking to having a fourth interest coming through his new subdivision in the very near future at all? Councilman Geving moved, Mayor Hamilton seconded to approve the final plat for Pheasant Hill 4th Addition subject to submission of the appropriate financial securities and execution of the development contract and that Takoma Trail street name be changed. All voted in favor and motion carried. AGENDA: PHEASANT HILL 4TH ADDITION, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Councilman Johnson: Actually I had a page and a quarter which our City Engineer helped me go through and answered most of my questions. I was out there looking at this. I wanted it to be noted that grading has already been started in there. That earth movers are going. Silt fences are up but not up properly and not the type that we're looking for. I don't like see developers start before we have... Hamilton: There might be a reason for that. Councilman Johnson: I would like to know if there was a reason for that. I know it was put a stop to about a week ago by our City Engineer. We've got several wetlands right there that I'm very concerned for. The one on Mr. Nye's property and the one to the south of you. We've got to get very serious with these silt fences. There is a dump site existing. I finally found the Chanhassen dump site. I've been very proud of this town. In 6 years I have not found a dump site in this town but unfortunately have finally found one on what I believe is approximately the area of Block 1, Lots 5 and 6. There is some old refrigerator, a couple stoves, a couple clothes washers, mattresses, box springs, destruction debris and I want to add a condition for the approval [: i City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 that the material be removed there, such as the washer and stoves. The , concrete blocks and stuff make good fill. I don't want washing machines and this stuff to end up buried in people's yards. Tan Klingelhutz: It was not me that put them there. Councilman Johnson: You own it now. You bought it right along with the property unfortunately. Gary actually answered most of my concerns. Mayor Hamilton: At this time I would like to ask Tan to respond to the questions that you raised. Tom Klingelhutz: You were there Saturday I heard. You also talked to Mr. Schumo who lives on Pheasant Circle. We were moving dirt on their property and also we dug down along the swamp to find out how much bad dirt is there. When we had it dug out, we filled it with clay. We didn't move very much dirt. I have put the silt fence up some time ago because I was concerned about dirt washing in there from last year's construction. I know it's not what you really want but it was something and I certainly will make it better. I's real concerned about the lowlands myself. Very much so. Mayor Hamilton: What about the question about the refrigerators and things on the property. Tom Klingelhutz: They were there when I bought the property and some of them I have trees that are 4 inches in diameter growing right up through them. I certainly can take them out of there and have than hauled away. Tom Nye: There is some question about the inability of water to pass through my property and make it's way onto Lake Lucy. There used to be a drain tile that drains into his property that has subsequently been dammed up and a lot of it is sitting in there now. It has nowhere to go. With no rainfall at all, you can see it hasn't moved. It will never be dry in there. There are two ponds that you dynamited I don't know how long ago and those will always be there but now it has spread all out and it has no way to make it's way to Lake Lucy and Lake Ann. Just something I wanted to point. It's going to fill up pretty bad in there and it will affect the back lots of his property at some point in time. Mayor Hamilton: Are you familiar with that Tan? Gary Warren: I was out to visit Tom's site earlier and also have been talking with Tom Klingelhutz about it. The old drain tile scenario I guess is one that is hard to put specific facts on but as Tom admits, the property maybe it's higher now than what it was as far as water ponding but it always has been wet to a certain degree. We have a storm sewer that is on the property line as a result of the 2nd and 3rd Addition improvements out there that I haven't had a chance to get back to Tom about but in talking with Tom Klingelhutz, he's agreeable to allowing drain tile to be tapped into that outlet there. We wouldn't drain that pond completely, which I don't think you want but it would provide a high water outlet for Tom so we hope to work with the two Tans to try to make that work out. M. 4LPO City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 Tom Klingelhutz: If there doesn't get fixed there is going to be a potential problem. If we had a hard rain, he would probably lose about half his property. Mayor Hamilton: So you are agreeable to work out the problem? Tom Klingelhutz: Yes. There's no problem. Mayor Hamilton: Is that alright with you Tom? Tom Nye: Right. It's been dry so I haven't had a problem but if we do get some rain, it's going to be a problem for not only me but for him and his development. Mayor Hamilton: But you agree to work with Tom Klingelhutz to resolve the Tom Nye: Absolutely. Councilman Johnson: On your back property line where you put your new fence, is that your property line? Tom Nye: No. It's in. 'Councilman Johnson: It's in a little ways because the water right now, as of Saturday, was beyond that fence. an Nye: I waded through the water to put the fence up. uncilman Johnson: I think your disposal site on the south side is already lled. The area marked as disposal site seems to be pretty darn full right w with the little bit of moving you've already done. I think we've got it etty well. I talked to Gary about silt fencing on the north side to make re that we protect Mr. Nye's pond. I'm sad that we're going to lose as many ees on this one as we are. Klingelhutz: We're going to try to keep every tree we can. We're not 3 to site grade entirely back to the lots. The sites we have, as we build as and try to preserve as much as we can out there on the house sites. Johnson: So you will individually grade the lots to the pads? Klingelhutz: We will individually grade them as the houses are sold. r Hamilton moved, Councilman Horn seconded to approve the plans and ifications for Pheasant Hill 4th Addition. All voted in favor and motion ied. ' ST VILLAGE HEIGHTS, 1/2 MILE NORTH OF WEST 78TH STREET, BILL JACOBSON: A. SUBDIVISION OF 24.1 ACRES INTO 3 LOTS OF MULTIPLE FAMILY. 37 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Adam Peterson <adam@klardig.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12:47 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Nye Addition (1641 W. 63rd St.) Subdivision and Variance Hello Sharmeen AI-Jaaf, I am writing regarding this proposed development that keeps rearing its head... I live at 1661 Wood Duck Lane, and we bought our home because it was on a Cul-de-sac, why do we as a homeowner have to lose this value to our home so someone can build on a poorly broken out property. I have 2 young children who ride bikes, fly kites, play soccer and basketball out there all the time, and I hate to think of all the construction equipment driving by. I just had our home painted, and who will pay for repainting after all the dust is kicked up from digging/grading/trucks hauling dirt in front of my home? That's why I left Minneapolis. I watched this with the McDonald development of Pheasant Hills Park. Construction debris blown all over the place, materials left haphazardly in piles, and no concern for the roadways covered in muck and mud as they enter and exit the site. It is still a mess over there even though more than half the homes are occupied. The property for sale has access, and that should remain the access going forward. Developers can try to by the 2 smaller properties adjacent to the lot on the east for future development, but they sure don't need to backdoor via my quite street. I heard talk of a large retaining wall being built into the hill, does that mean I can't let my kids just run outside and play for fear someone is going to climb this and potentially fall? I know of a couple of shared driveways in our area and see no reason why this property couldn't be developed the same way. Thank you, Adam Peterson Project Manager �KID Di "Construction services that suit you" Direct 612.260.5757 1 Mobile 612.327.69211 Fax 612.260.5754 1 klardie.com Klar Dig Construction, Inc. 1 632 Mendelssohn Ave. N. I Minneapolis, MN 55427 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Woody Love <woody@woodylove.com> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 3:09 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Cc: Mark Rausch; CenturyLink Customer; Tim Keane Subject: 63rd Sharmeen I have talked with Mark. As applicant, we are aware that we are submitting early. Further, we are aware that any time periods, specifically the 60 day rule, does not begin until the application deadline of April 3, 2020 Please contact me with any need for further clarification. Woody Love 612.695.3001 Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note10-. AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Ken Ashfeld <KAshfeld@maplegrovemn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 8:22 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Cc: Ken Ashfeld Subject: Nye Addition Sharmeen, Thank you for the opportunity to comment relative to the proposed Nye Addition, which is adjacent and north of the property owned by myself and my wife, Barb Ashfeld. Please accept these comments and extend same to the Chanhassen Planning Commission and City Council as you deem appropriate. I can't guarantee my attendance at the Planning Commission meeting but if you think it important that I attend, please let me know. Firstly, let me state that being new to the community, I am stating what I understand to be factual from what I have heard from neighbors, the applicant and other prospective buyers of the Nye property. We have enjoyed the couple years that we have been here, enjoyed the open spaces and the excellent planning that is exemplative of the City of Chanhassen. Obviously, you and the city staff, Planning Commission and City Council have been at creating a great city for a long time, and it shows. However, we live on a large acreage parcel which takes a lot of upkeep and adding new neighbors would be welcomed. It is my understanding that it has been the goal of the City to extend Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite for a long time. That appears obvious from the design of the Pheasant Hill development with limited access and extensive truncated streets, inclusive of Wood Duck Lane. I believe the long term planning of the area is sound, assuming that it was feasible to extend Wood Duck to Yosemite. The extension of Wood Duck would facilitate the public safety needs of the Pheasant Hill neighborhood. The current property owners adjacent to Wood Duck, at Yosemite, has indicated to a previous potential buyer of the Nye property that their expectations for compensation for additional right of way makes the extension of Wood Duck unfeasible if only the Nye property and our property is responsible for the cost of acquisition and building all the infrastructure. We do not care to be an obstructionist to the objectives of the Nye family but from my view of the proposal, and if approved, the objective of extending Wood Duck Lane is no longer possible. Although it is admirable that they are comprehending the needed right of way from their property, there remains an encumbered right of way extending east to Yosemite. There would no longer be a need or desire for the Nye property to want to extend the roadway. From my understanding, it has been envisioned that our property could create three additional lots and from my 42 years of City planning and engineering, I would concur. Having said that, the three lots would incur the cost of single sided benefit, which most developers attempt to avoid, and certainly could not take on the cost of right of way acquisition and the extension of Wood Duck. Essentially, Wood Duck Lane would forever remain a very long truncated roadway causing the overall master plan to not be realized and resulting in lack of public safety access to the Pheasant Hill neighborhood, which is the fundamental principle of urban planning. It is not my nature to point out a problem without offering a potential solution. Our access currently consists of a private drive under approval and agreement with the City. The ongoing maintenance and snow removal is recognized to be our responsibility. It is, my suggestion that if the City wishes to approve the Nye Addition, it is also memorialized that our property could subdivide under a PUD process whereby four lots would have access via a private drive over the existing right of way, reconstructed to City PUD private drive standards. In effect, the existing 33 foot right of way would support a 20 foot drive. The four parcels would be encumbered with a Reciprocal Operating Agreement "ROA" filed as a covenant on the properties to required the administrator of the ROA, myself and successors, to maintain the drive to the acceptance of the City or, if in breach of contract, allow the City to maintain with costs special assessed to the four properties with right of appeal waived. Furthermore, a paved connection to Wood Duck Lane would be constructed to provide access for public safety vehicles and bicycles/pedestrians from the Pheasant Hill to Yosemite. I believe this would accomplish the objectives of all interested parties, in that: • The Nyes would be afforded what they are requesting. • The City would have public safety access that doesn't currently exist, and probably never will. • Current residents along Yosemite are not required to lose property to additional right of way. • The Pheasant Hill neighborhood would have bicycle/pedestrian access to Yosemite and safer access to downtown Excelsior without having to navigate Highway 7 and busy intersections. • It is my understanding that the Pheasant Hill neighborhood is opposed to extending Wood Duck Lane for vehicular traffic. • Provide development potential for our property. Without some solution to reasonable access, our property is being denied the ability to subdivide that all properties surrounding us have enjoyed. The properties involved present a very difficult planning scenario and although not wanting to be a critic of the overall planning, the end result is our property becomes deprived and is not able to be in compliance with the comprehensive plan for the area. I realize that it is unfair to present all of this to the Planning Commission and City Council without a specific proposal from us. This has all come on so quick and differently than what I was led to believe and expected. I only wish to state that the approval of the Nye Addition closes the option of extending Wood Duck Lane without financial contributions from the City and exercise the right of eminent domain to acquire additional right of way. Our property will simply remain a large acreage parcel with a single residence. Being new to the community doesn't mean that I am new to the issues created by development. Sharmeen, you, the Planning Commission and City Council take on a difficult task on a daily basis planning for the creation of a vibrant community. You have all succeeded! If I can answer any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at my office at 763-494-6351 (direct) or cell at 612-581- 8716. Ken Ken Ashfeld 6480 Yosemite Excelsior, MN 55331 Thank you, Adam Peterson Klar Dig Construction, Inc. Cell (612) 327-6921 Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse any typos. On Apr 29, 2020, at 11:37 AM, AI-Jaff, Sharmeen <SAI-Jaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> wrote: Good morning Adam, I included your e-mail as an attachment to the staff report. Here is a link to the staff report. https•//chanhassen novusagenda com/agendai)ublic/CoverSheet aspx?ItemID=1727&MeetingiD=172 Sincerely, <image002.png> Sharmeen AI-Jaff <image006.png> Senior Planner CITY OF CHANHASSEN PH. 952.227.1134 FX. 952.227.1110 www. ci.cha nha ssen. mn. us <image007.png> <image008.png> From: Adam Peterson <adam@klardig.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12:47 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen <SAI-Jaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Nye Addition (1641 W. 63rd St.) Subdivision and Variance Hello Sharmeen AI-Jaaf, I am writing regarding this proposed development that keeps rearing its head... I live at 1661 Wood Duck Lane, and we bought our home because it was on a Cul-de-sac, why do we as a homeowner have to lose this value to our home so someone can build on a poorly broken out property. I have 2 young children who ride bikes, fly kites, play soccer and basketball out there all the time, and I hate to think of all the construction equipment driving by. I just had our home painted, and who will pay for repainting after all the dust is kicked up from digging/grading/trucks hauling dirt in front of my home? That's why I left Minneapolis. I watched this with the McDonald development of Pheasant Hills Park. Construction debris blown all over the place, materials left haphazardly in piles, and no concern for the roadways covered in muck and mud as they enter and exit the site. It is still a mess over there even though more than half the homes are occupied. The property for sale has access, and that should remain the access going forward. Developers can try to by the 2 smaller properties adjacent to the lot on the east for future development, but they sure don't need to backdoor via my quite street. I heard talk of a large retaining wall being built into the hill, does that mean I can't let my kids just run outside and play for fear someone is going to climb this and potentially fall? I know of a couple of shared driveways in our area and see no reason why this property couldn't be developed the same way. Thank you, Adam Peterson Project Manager <image001.jpg> "Construction services that suit you" Direct 612.260.5757 1 Mobile 612.327.69211 Fax 612.260.5754 1 klardig.com Klar Dig Construction, Inc. 1 632 Mendelssohn Ave. N. I Minneapolis, MN 55427 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, May 5, 2020 Subject Consider a Request for Approval of the Subdivision of 6.4 Acres into Two Single -Family Lots with Variances for Property Located at 1641 W. 63rd Street (Nye Addition) Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.2. Prepared By Shamteen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 2020-06 PROPOSED MOTION• The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to subdivide 6A acres into two lots and one outlot as shown in plans dated March 27, 2020, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the Findings of Fact and Decision Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST Subdivision of 6.4 acres into two lots and one outlot APPLICANT Woody Love, Engel & Volkers, 18202 Minnetonka Boulevard, Deephaven, MN, Ann Nye, 1641 W. 63rd Street, Excelsior, MN SITE INFORMATION PRESENT ZONING: Single -Family Residential Low Density, RSF LAND USE: Residential Low Density (1.24.0 units/net acre) ACREAGE: 6.4 acres DENSITY: 0.3 units per acre APPLICATION REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Sec. 18-57. - Streets Sec. 1 "0. - Lots(f) Chapter 20, Article JQI, RSF District BACKGROX On April 20,1987, the City Council approved the final plat for Pheasant Hill 4th Addition. The Wood Duck Lane connection to Yosemite Avenue was discussed at length. The intent was to: • Help disperse the traffic between Wood Duck Lane and 63rd Street by providing an additional access point into the Pheasant Hill Subdivision. • This connection would also help provide future access to 6480 Yosemite Avenue and allow it to potentially subdivide. • Allow 1611 63rd Street to potentially subdivide. • The measured distance from Lake Lucy Road to the end of Wood Duck Lane is 1900 feet. This is of concern to emergency management responders. • Wood Duck Lane ended in a temporary cul-de-sac. Due to lack of a feasibility study, adequate right-of-way and cost, the connection was postponed. Staff located a feasibility study for the improvement of Yosemite Avenue. The Wood Duck Lane connection was not included in the study. RECOMMENDATION The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to subdivide 6.4 acres into two lots and one outlot as shown on plans dated March 27, 2020, subject to the conditions in the staff report and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Staff Report ❑ Development Review Application ❑ Findings of Fact and Recommendation ❑ Preliminary Plan Sheets dated March 27, 2020 ❑ Final Plat Sheets dated March 27, 2020 ❑ Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing List ❑ Petition - Nye Development 63rd Street ❑ Petition - Save Wood Duck Lane ❑ City Council Minutes dated April 20. 1987. ❑ E-mail from Adam Peterson dated April 28, 2020 ❑ E-mail from Woody Love Regarding the 60day Timeline ❑ E-mail from Ken Ashfeld dated April 28, 2020 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Nye Addition for Subdivision approval. On May 5, 2020, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Nye Addition for preliminary plat approval of property into two lots and one outlot. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential - RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Low Density Residential. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 3, Block 1, Lenvilla Estates. 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven affects and our findings regarding them are: SUBDIVISION FINDINGS a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single - Family District and the zoning ordinance if the conditions of approval are met. b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and subdivision ordinance if the conditions of approval are met. c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report. d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision will provide adequate urban infrastructure subject to the conditions specified in this report. e. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: Plat. 1) Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets if the specified conditions of approval are met. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 5d' day of May, 2020. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION I.YS Steven Weick gAplan\2020 planning cros\20-06 nye addition sub and var\indings of factdocx a NYE ADDITION ALLIANT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA L_J r BLOCK ��I 11 gVrm,u _�I J __J L VICINITY MAP SHEETINDEX NO. Mvm sNlxr I DETAILS Sd EKISTNGCOND111DNSSURVEY 4 PRELIMNARY PLAT 5 SIZE PLAN 6 GRADNG AND DMMAGE PLAN I EROSIONANDSEDMWMNWOLMAN 8 EROSION AND SEDNIENT MWROL NOTES AND DETAILS 9 ST AND SAWARY PLAN AND PROFILE 10 TREE CANOPY MV AGE PLAN 11 LANDSCAPE PLAN lE PEL OAS P`KSrON P Np1f� OWNER ANNNYE-TRUSTEE 16416.lw ST.W CHANHASSEN,MN./51tI MNTACT: AM NYE W..am ed9.wm APPLICANT Mon A VOLKERS 18202 MMNEPONKA RLVD sum 1w DEEPHAVEN. MN. 53191 PH:61b 913001 COWACT: WOODY LOW EM: WOWYO, wd ve.wm CONSULTANT ALLSAW ENGNEERNG. NC. 111 MAROU PPE AVENUE SUMVP MNNEA DLIS.ASN5540 PH 612•158-10M FA : 612-I5e-3099 ENGINEER MARK RAUSCH LICENSE NO. 414M EM', mrpi¢NrTVI11Marc.wm Sl1RVEYOR PETER D. DOERS LICENSE NO. 44110 EM'. ppaertrNnllMm-0c.mm LM Ts6vlvaas��A. NrIYM IlWXII OiOfW[EI9 LUSS NW'.q�auulW vwanYalpnOraW (�[ iNvn�v 1[ l— ONYMQ[ m .out OW Ora15vJ 3Drlrnrl z M.I -A-_ vt� tat ' Iy' ' cR.uaswxcn. ' airs:; sxaaxar-• ' iaM IJtYL191A_AAP' • *u N reuxnr a I * JI• I n.a..rxrcns° I GSS.` E mlf n PPOJEEC- NAME y 0 ALLIANT ]i Ma ello Awrxw Su iM wmrn� n,MN�5 m. m,ne waw 63RD LEGEND d 1 P "SIREEI 1 3 v P � N LEd DESOPIP M NOTES Ia J L-----------� 63RD — swim roam I I cEND: — 1. LAW roc — =A. .. as ,A, 4 I a — — — — II L — — — — ALLI�ANT STREET frosawWano..m��o m — — ® awroo -1. •• —. —_ __ — AA — alzivaaaeo "Gts _ . www.uenawcwn � E � R I 4 f BLOCK 1 1 �' �p ro ONiµ VMW ROiti^ui .' OUTLOT A A. PRE .,AA.. PR.1a u 5 5 01 12 II I, — — — — — — — — — — L — — — — — STREET ALLIANT m WquMNT o m Y wrloo Aismsm abraaNmm SITE PLAN DATA wwwimu:. wNr um n .[V um u�wn/M .�cn[ LOT DATA TABLE Y.VYMIIYfY wi "1` _Roos (xl Mxi n • 9[E Ylw%; 9E[ I..CN Wi [(ly I I I I 7 I i was wua rY / y�i i 2 ,y ; BLOCK 1 ' OUTLOTA II II i mxwl I '� _ �Al(bICIKTR�VC A x gIR7 �� u..xYN _ _,a•. � A [MAIN 11x[ip11N� C /,�/i� " LEGEND: WETLAND SUMMARY r ___ _. usn.r�. :emeyo tm.tlets_ W02Ieti exe _�_____ ___l 'w wn I 1 ---- WETLAND BUFFER CALCULATION Fm T. �q..�, .� CYV.r M� a �•N YAMMN�1 LxM.�r�l I vn Wu r__________J >01"+"N nrrarxwlxrr.erwr.Yrrr....nr...wWN.�w TYPICAL LOT DETAIL 63RD ------------ m€ STREET20 , j i y >� • Au 14 12 _ pw i BLOCK' 1 11 GRADING NOTES: DEVELOPEF ILI \i , . ALL �\... .11,vL P cp / VMMI PAD ALLIIAANT TA MegnMAwne &4lN 1.Baieq$.BllBe@ -.emnearo_ r o (1/11 OUTLOT A m H = 5 4.UAA10 a,�, g w ¢ _ MA a O Z > Z F s w w a a (! GRADING LEGEND: �...�.. aoem AawcVmmw eaflD STREET I II Y�I , I -I BLOCK 1 I,{ 4' --- DND Ji, DND^- DND^- o CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING: ACTIVE SWPPP LEGEND I SCHEDULE M.sc rn. Ee» T� III ' SWPPP BMP QUANTITIES (PER PLAN): III Ic Fal I .. m' I.�uavI. XOR: Ctl1A,CT11. ZNFRu CDtll�•CIW W 6W,n NIM M1WEI[ 1NV Y W4Y4C M�[BS e [ O w [4a�i1I44u4 B-Z 1. sr NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: _ Ii.o-roo,..,.•u� ,or. ,->o I�-•.,w.�:�u9°:�iWl. It .-44�, W, . 4�• Rd� Rvw„�. ,o �.:,.,, .4.ry��. �„,,..�a „4 i ounpi A�j EROSION CONTROL H�A516�F13Yf V: NOTES • LEGEND: DND w •a+•+� TI a+� V ALLIANT EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: MT IM ...,....r L"I wr.. r.w .�d�ir[ rtw, u u wrae re n� [rr[[m[ rwnr<rd v wn. va 1— ITT 11 ITT— sm T llti. EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE: .rvwmo1o.`wi.`.n SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICESIT IT-11I TIT IT-1 FINAL STABILIZATION: ati.�bw ai'�Iw'nr n¢l w�owwm�ma v ww• wawa �. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: un11TTIT .T—' [. ry rr wa"[51 a u[ xru[ .xm a[.r[• rr �n POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES: T. o "P98 P����MrvN�cllrn� p01 ALLIANT m M.'a.[[•Y.anue eoo mo W2, sYwM, NpSgi �e+z rsY.smo .swn.z.�m 2 m u arxn Nan' I awmu�nrs cwm� � � g � Mir uenluo6 4' l / `4' eY JN O N lF Y11RE1 W 1 i UnUTV NOTES: LEGEND: —• ­1 u ....r,.0 ". !. n 1--.lu. Parc.�o.Yp o� oo�..a .„x.,. ,gym BLOCK 1 1020 w zw„ vPw] OUTLOTA Y 0 ALLIANT !i]Me paella Awruo SU N ]CO ! eeCdp, MN XIM A B1P.15B.]ObJ ,.--•• MVINKTRAIL GYM a 0 N owiAnml tilE m wY1[o wl]xYl � m � mIMILN Z[Y�l OIMUY J Q h 5 5 n a r J Q Nf S 1060 i d � 3 W 1050 wri 1040 oMun .muxu� a.le. ! ea 1030 � a at .. --- ---102a 1010 e a 9a "e ffi3 S s § 9 w10Nr lrm ]rw ]rW rrw s.ro YrW yw 10011E A s.AFE, , T •x '� ftA r4M � � .•... Ar uLOCK 1, � aj � ^ ounoTn } y LEGEND wow � tit A MtY�Y 0 mT 1. A Arq�Art..w� r n� Ps � AV�YtNYVw4YtOww! MYtirwrA w wa i 0 n�wrrwrrww s w�u � ewneNrwAw.r brartYY+taAr Atr �.� 0 ALLIANT M pueXePwnuo 5� a NCO SHOP i. 59.dOPo, n pYN�. N rF6f IfW Yw 0 ]! M w® �1 luaexuw m'w url,a am vem wn,u -. s amn O nau vnms va,u,w O ON3'J3l �yoa m � m o - m g --ram_. f _ lrodivwoNvit m v iouno sW06'Wl'LIBmm NeW N1Y'S�,MW NL M,O wiuvtleYenOisy, Cf! 1NYoIl �Y A SWMRWD38 3dWJWW 0 �� .v o•uc a nna+.x x n %uw,eea poe .w •+w mu oew mom,' wy' � �w;Y a w,�i n MS3l0 ONLLwd 033S �T �TMww��mS31C ME9 - — NYE ADDITION ae.._4e�L �w�nibwwu.��w Mnt MF.Me Lly AIOb tM01311JFI lFl 00 p IM M AwG N lil mw ..as m vmrmv{ .,nun a.. n.reno ;y i =- I N011lGGV 3AN Nye Addition Planning Case #202o-o6 PLANNING COMMISSION MAY S, 2020 CITY COUNCIL MAY 26, 2020 APPLICANT: WOODY LOVE ENGEL & VOLKERS 1 North of Wood Duck Lane and south of West 63rd Street. Nye 63'a Street i Lot 1 Lot 2 Outbt A 4001, The applicant is proposing to subdivide 6.4 acres into two lots and one outlot ototl isgained-off ofdIiU IL ue single-famil home. Lot 2 has an existing accessory structure. uires t e construction of the primary structure prior to tie acces! s; This subdivision will create a nonconforming situation. Staff is recommending an h �1� 9 escrow of 110% of the estimated remove cost a posted with the city prior to 0 recording of the final plat. The accessory structure must be removed within four ��'� months of the approval of the final plat. Sewer and water are available to the site..lkfl'� lots meet the minimum area, width and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Outlot A contains a wetland and is intended to be deeded to the city. The applicant is also dedicating right-of-way to the city for the possible future extension of Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite Avenue. f, notes that the proposal is consistent with t rally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. Plan and is 3 Access •," 63ro treat n,m ----1 , ,,- Lot t will continue to utilize �, J�w_L L existing driveway access .1= r from 63rd Street r Lott "' ", < < • ", • Lot 2 __ i'sw'' f' 3 Lot z proposed to have access from Wood Duck o�w ..., _.__� } Lane ------► Access Points The proposed subdivision has frontage on both 631 Street W. to the north and Wood Duck Lane to the south. Lot 1 will maintain the existing connection to 63rd Street W. and the newly created Lot 2 will connect to existing Wood Duck Lane right-of-way. n Right -of -Way Dedication 63' St - VA" r+"� %L >' LL• . a� l�Q: •••.•• E E i i♦ ti s �1 OUTLOTA 50.' ! ,.:,.■,� _ mx Dedication of public ROW for TON A dF — — future connection to Yosemite • Planned connection since �( r� 198o's .� De and dROW The proposed plat illustrates a dedication of public right-of-way for the future extension of Wood Duck Lane. The dedicated portion of public right-of-way will be adequate to achieve a consistent 50 foot wide right-of-way throughout the corridor. While 50 feet is not the City's standard right-of-way width, it will be consistent with the surrounding right-of-ways such as 631d Street W to the north and Wood Duck Lane to the south (also 50 feet wide) and is all that is necessary to improve the future street, which is heavily constrained by private properties. 5 Cul-De-Sac Improvements BLOCK 1 OUTLOTA Temporary cul-de-sac being brought up to City Standards Fxpanded radius for — _------------' `- - g emergency vehicles — — — — Modified design based on topographic constraints nsxc exr.x •.wuc �xna x / !G i wm.. E=hngCu1 d& Sec Proposed Qil-de-Sec The applicant is proposing to reconstruct the temporary cul-de-sac at the end of Wood Duck Lane to bring it into conformance with city standards and city ordinances. The temporary cul-de-sac standard from city Detail Plate #5205B requires a diameter of 70 feet. The cul-de-sac is located in an area with significant grade change to the north and one existing access to the south from 1641 Wood Duck Lane and thus the applicant has proposed a modified temporary cul-de-sac from Detail Plate #5205B. After review by staff, the proposed modification is generally acceptable as it meets the intent of Detail Plate #520513 while maintaining access to 1641 Wood Duck Lane for when the street is extended in the future. Due to the substantial grades to the north, the applicant proposes to regrade to achieve a 2:1 grade; if a retaining wall is required, all walls exceeding 4' in height shall be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer and shall be constructed of a durable material (smooth face concrete/poured in place, masonry/mortared, railroad ties and timber are prohibited). 0 Water & Sanitary i it Hrum.» / li .I 2 /a BLOCK 1 A I ounoT A I; - — rntbeoc R Gn N� Het - _ IOL R Ttq Eidsting WaterMam ITW ON1✓..�»O proposed SenttervMam X. P�� °"�°'"°' ----------- proposedwater Service .i ELttJttt`1 ----------- Proposed Se%vr Senice The proposed subdivision has access to public sanitary sewer and water mains that are located within abutting right-of-ways. The existing home on Lot 1 currently has active sanitary sewer and water services from the mains located within 63'd Street W. right-of-way to the north. The applicant is proposing to maintain those services. However, Lot 2 will require new services to be tapped from the sanitary sewer and water mains located through Wood Duck Lane right-of-way to the south. This will require the developer to extend the existing public sanitary sewer main within Wood Duck Lane right-of-way to the east, approximately 150 lineal feet. The applicant has shown within the preliminary plans the feasibility of this extension and the general conformity to city Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Prior to extending the sanitary sewer main, the existing manhole in which the extension is to occur (MH 04- 110) shall be inspected to ensure it is in good condition and is up to city standards. Any required repairs will be the responsibility of the developer. This extended public sanitary sewer main shall be owned and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvement by the City Council. The developer's contractor shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with Engineering and Public Works Utilities prior to the commencement of any work to the sanitary sewer main extension. 7 The applicant has proposed the dedication of Outlot A to the city, which would encompass the delineated wetland in its entirety. Staff recommends extending the boundaries of Outlot A to incorporate the wetland buffer. This will require a six foot D&U abutting the Outlot A's new boundary line rather than the proposed 24 foot D&U. The proposed plat should be adjusted accordingly. The wetland located on Lot 2 was delineated by Alliant Engineering, Inc. in the Fall of 2019. The delineation and classification was approved by the city. As discussed previously, the applicant is proposing to dedicate Outlot A to the city, which fully encompasses the 2019 delineated wetland located on Lot 2. There are additional wetlands within the subdivision, located in the western portion of Lot 1, however these wetlands have already been covered by drainage and utility easements back in 2006, and are to be maintained. The applicant is proposing no impacts to the wetlands on either Lot 1 or 2. All requirements of Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District regarding wetland buffers shall be adhered to. 93 The applicant for the Nye Addition has submitted tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations. The only area proposed to be disturbed is where the house pad driveway and cul-de-sac improvement is proposed. COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN The city's comprehensive park plan calls for a neighborhood park to be located within one-half mile of every residence in the city. Nye Addition is located within one-half mile of both . These two neighborhood park locations offer ample amenities for those residing in the Nye Addition. COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN City trails located within both Curry Farms Park and Pheasant Hill Park and adjacent to Lake Lucy Road provide convenient trail connections for both recreation and transportation. 10 1 c,) t � I Co Yl� GIG �ou karnMTd60 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE NYE ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA March 27, 2020 SITE INFORMATION Legal Description: Lot 3, Block 1, Lenvilla Estates, Carver County, Minnesota. +� d^ k w Z,- Abstract Property. Yov """k4 i'w3 Address: 1641631 Street West, Chanhassen, MN iywtk o< "Dh- PID: 254150012 EXISTING SITE DESCRIPATION The development site is 6.4 acres in size and currently contains one single family residence with multiple accessory buildings. The property is irregular in shape with frontage along 631 Street to the north and to Wood Duck Lane right of way to the south. The property abuts existing residential properties to the east, west and southwest. Right of way access is available to 63rd St and to the Wood Duck Lane corridor. A small wetland has been delineated in the east side of the property and there are existing ponds and wetlands on the west half of the property currently covered by existing drainage and utility easement. PROPOSED PRELMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN The proposed development plan consists of a low -density single-family residential subdivision that splits an existing parcel into 2 single family residential lots. The existing home would remain on 1 parcel and a new home would be constructed on the new lot. Comprehensive Plan Designation The application area has a Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation of Residential Low Density. The adjacent land uses are also Residential Low Density. The Residential Low Density land use guides for single family housing density of 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre. The proposed development plan has a net density of 0.89 units per net acre due to the irregular shape of the property and desire to keep the existing homestead in place. Land Use Density Calculation: Gross Site Acreage 6.403 acres Wetland Area (Outlot A) 0.336 acres Existing Drainage/Utility Easement on Lot 1 3.472 acres Wood Duck Lane R/W Dedication 0.123 acres Net Acreage 2.472 acres Net Density (2 lots) 0.81 units per acre PreliminM Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal March 27, 2020 Nye Subdivision — Chanhassen, MN Page 1 of 4 Zoning Classification The property has a current zoning classification of RSF — Single Family Residential District as do the surrounding properties to the north, east, west and south. The proposed subdivision is consistent with RSF standards. A summary of required and proposed lot standards criteria for RSF zoning is as follows: Required Proposed Lot Area - Minimum 15,000 SF 36,196 SF (0.83 ac) Average Lot Area N/A 128,793 SF (2.96 ac) Lot Width/Frontage — Minimum 90, 154.2' Lot Depth — Minimum 125' 192' Setbacks Front 30' 30' Rear — Principal 30' 30' Side — Garage 10, 10, Side — Principal 10, 10, Minimum Right -of -Way Width 60' N/A, RW dedication as City requested Subdivision Features and Benefits • 1 new single-family home and the preservation of the existing homestead on 2°d lot. • Preservation of onsite wetlands and provision of additional wetland buffer area. • Outlot creation over the easterly wetland area. • Outlot A to be provided to the City for public dedication of 0.336 acres after final platting. • Wetland buffer creation in the stricter of watershed requirements. The buffer area proposed on Lot 2 will also be covered by drainage and utility easement as will all of Outlot A. • Dedication of additional Wood Duck Lane right of way of 0.123 acres. • Public land dedication totaling 0.459 acres. • Extension of public sanitary sewer 150 lineal feet to the east within Wood Duck Lane right of way. • Reconstruction of the existing Wood Duck Lane cul-de-sac in accordance with the City's temporary cul-de- sac design dimension of 70' in diameter. Vehicular Site Access and Pedestrian Circulation The proposed subdivision does not require construction of a linear extension of new public roadway or walkways. Right of way access for vehicles and pedestrians is available to both proposed lots. The existing home to be on Lot lwill maintain the existing connection to 631 Street and the new lot (Lot 2) will connect to existing Wood Duck Lane right of way. The subdivision will be required to reconstruct the existing cul-de-sac at the end of Wood Duck Lane. The existing cul-de-sac was previously not built to City standard and is dimensionally too small for a large vehicle to turn around. The design plans propose to reconstruct the cul-de-sac in accordance with City Detail Plate 5205B with a 70' diameter. The cul-de-sac is located in an area with significant grade change to the north, likely the reason of the undersized current cul-de-sac. The proposed increase to 70' in diameter will require regrading of the north slope any larger cul-de-sac could result in need for retaining wall in the right of way. Grading and Tonograoh Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal Mareh 27 2020 Nye Subdivision — Chanhassen, MN Page 2 of 4 Minimal grading will be required for the proposed subdivision. Grading will be needed to reconstruct the existing cul-de-sac, install a required sanitary trunk sewer extension and construct one new home. All eatthmoving activities necessary for construction will require erosion and sediment control per City of Chanhassen and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District requirements. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain The project does not require extension of any public sanitary sewer or watermain trunk lines with 63' Street, in which, utilities exist. Lot I and the existing home will continue to be connected to the 63' Street trunk sanitary and water mains via existing services. The City has required as part of a subdivision request that the existing sanitary sewer in Wood Duck Lane be extended east approximately 150 lineal feet within existing public right of way. The proposed new Lot 2 will have a sanitary sewer service connection to the trunk sewer. A trunk watermain currently exists within the Wood Duck Lane right of way and Lot 2 will connect a new water service to that line. Stormwater Manaeement The development site is located within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; however, the City of Chanhassen and the City's Surface Water Management Plan provides governmental jurisdiction. The proposed development's size of 2 lots and minimal impact area does not trigger any stormwater management requirements from the City of Chanhassen nor MCWD and thus no new stormwater treatment facilities are required. Wetland Mana ement The site east wetland was delineated by Alliant Engineering, Inc in Fall of 2019 and the delineation and classification was approved by the City of Chanhassen and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The following is a summary of the buffer requirements for the project: Local Governmental Unit City of Chanhassen I Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Wetland Buffer Strip Principal Accessory Structure Wetland Average Base Min. Avg Base Classification Requirement Structure c Setback to Classification Buffer Width Buffer Width Setback Buffer Required' Required z Buffer MANAGE 2 20 30 15 MANAGE 2 30 24 Notes: 1) Minnehaha Creek Watershed District allows a 2' base buffer width reduction for every 5% decrease in average buffer slope from 20%. 2) Proposed buffer averages 10% or less throughout thus the min. buffer can be reduced to 24'. (30 - 2' e 2 = 24') The development plan assumes the most conservative buffer application as defined above by proposing buffers in compliance with MCWD and structure buffer setbacks in accordance with the City rules. In general this results in a combined buffer and buffer setback that slightly exceeds the City's standalone requirement. The following is a summary of the proposed wetland buffers: Wetland Area' Class. (per City) Wetland Perimeter' Buffer Area I Minimum I Buffer Width Average Buffer Provided 1 367,654 SF MANAGE 1 1 1,555 LF 1 94,776 SF 1 24' 60.9' Notes: 1) Full wetland area including portion within proposed right of way dedication. 2) Buffer calculation is provided for wetland perimeter outside of proposed right of way dedication. Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal March 27.2020 Nye Subdivision — Chanhassen, MN Page 3 of 4 I.. The development site also contains other pond/wetland areas in the west portion of proposed Lot 1, but those areas have been previously covered by drainage and utility easement, which will be maintained. No impact is proposed to any onsite wetland. Tree Preservation The estimated baseline tree canopy coverage for the existing site is 45% of the net area (excluding wetland areas). Per the City code, low density residential is then allowed to remove to a limit of 35% tree canopy prior to requirement of mitigation. The development plan proposes to maintain tree canopy coverage of 4 1 % and thus a no tree mitigation is required. Landscanine City ordinance requires provision of 1 tree per lot and these trees will be installed by the future homebuilder and existing home lot owner. The proposed single-family yards to be disturbed by grading will be vegetated with typical residential turf grass and the wetland buffer and disturbed steep slope areas with appropriate seed mixes. TOIING/PIIASING If the City approves the preliminary subdivision and final plat request, it is the Applicant's desire to look for an interested homebuilder looking towards possible construction in Summer 2020. CONCLUSION The applicant respectfully concludes that the request for a rezoning and preliminary subdivision approval will allow for a development consistent with City Goals and Objectives for this area. The proposed development will create a single-family subdivision that is consistent with the adjacent land uses, provides preservation of wetlands, improves and extends existing public infrastructure. Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal March 27 2020 Nye Subdivision — Chanhassen, MN Page 4 of 4 NYE ADDITION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Ann B. Nye as Trustee of the Ann Nye Revocable Trust, dated May 16, 2014, owner of the following described property situated in the City of Chanhassen, County of Carver, State of Minnesota: Lot 3, Block 1, LENVILLA ESTATES, Carver County, Minnesota Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as _ and do here by donate and dedicate to the public the public ways and the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Ann B. Nye, Trustee of the Ann Nye Revocable Trust, dated May 16, 2014, have hereunto set their hands this _ day of 20 Ann B. Nye, Trustee of the Ann Nye Revocable Trust, dated May 16, 2014 STATE OF _ COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of , 20_, by Ann B. Nye, Trustee of the Ann Nye Revocable Trust, dated May 16, 2014 Signature Printed Notary Public, My Commission Expires I Peter Goers, Licensed Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that I have surveyed or directly supervised the survey of the property described on the plat; and prepared this plat or directly supervised the preparation of this plat; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this surveyor's certification are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this _ day of Peter Goers, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 44110 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 20_ This instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of , 20_, by Peter Goers, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 44110. Notary Public, My Commission Expires Signature Printed County, Minnesota CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Be it known that a meeting held on this day of 20_, the Planning Commission of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, did hereby plat of Planning Commission, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota By: Chairman By: Secretary CHANHASSEN ATTORNEY This plat of was reviewed and approved by the City Attorney for the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, this day of 20_ By City Attorney CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA This plat of was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 20_, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2 City Council, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota By: By: COUNTY SURVEYOR, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Pursuant to Chapter 395, Minnesota Laws of 1971, this plat has been approved this day of , 20_ Brian E. Praske, County Surveyor By: COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that taxes payable in and prior years have been paid for land described or, this plat. Dated this day of —,20—. Laurie Davies, County Auditor/rreasurer COUNTY RECORDER, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plat of (PLAT NAME) was filed this day of , 20_, at _ o'clock— M. as Document No. , County Recorder REGISTRAR OF TITLES, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plat of (PLAT NAME) was filed this day of , 20_, at _ o'clock _. M. as Document No. Registrar of Titles this ALLIANT ENCINEENING Jr cr- i I Vr L JrlCC 1 3 L_ r 1 I 1 -----DRAINAGE, UTILITY, AND ----' PONDING EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. A435105 S8802613511E 399.89 1 / I / I / I / I WET LAND 1 I I 1 l I \ I \WET LAND � 1 NYE ADDITION 0 h i RLS 46535 T S88°26'35'IE 100,00 -- r\ r- r- -,- Fe l- f- 1 - — — — — — — — — — — — — — —. — — — — O o I I I � 6i----_------�f I I I I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I I LU to I I I WI I I IcM•3 III NI I I i 2 III °hl i I I I I I of I I III ZI I I I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I I 5 2 0 l RLS 61 I ---------------------"—� I6 I I I I 1 I I 1 i€ 1 I L_ I I I I I - - 437.00 ___ I ------------------- -----� 1_ b - 111--'---------//�4 N\\-------------- /—N88°26'35"W 1000.00 I I` _' i�.. \\ \ / 1 -I 1'11\I L rI\ ii /� \N� -� vIL, ,•, r. 1 r II / RLS 24992 I /��1 I / 1 I / 1 I i � I I 1 I I 1 I � I I � I WET LAND / ( / I I / I � � I I � I I I -----DRAINAGE, UTILITY, AND-------------- PONDING EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. A435105 i i RLS 46535 �- 11— — — — — — — — — — — — — I I I II I I I$ II II I I CID I„ IIILu I IN I I IZ I I I II I 6 II — — — — — — — — — — J N88026'3511W 299.77 --------- I 5 I / N6A 56 01 I 2 �/ I °p / Fv I I I I I DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: I +I 6 I III I o III o I J _AIL �— *2l IL (NOT TO SCALE) 45.54 I - N89°12'39"E 59.31 WET LAND - OUTLOT A I Lo I MNI 3 I I S88°4634'E ' 19.42 �I d R,qB�� — �I�J. Z -25.11 N=65l L=96.13 4=8°28'25' I— — — — — — — -- — � / 6 j6°6y L=7.00_I i -N 40.681 64.87 0=0°51'42" I WOOD DUCK LANE / � Y n I Being 6 feet in width and adjoining lot lines I and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way L — — lines, unless otherwise indicated on the plat. — — I I ----- I -`- THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, LENVILLA 1$ :_, ESTATES IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N88026'35"E. -I Denotes monument found 1/2 inch iron pipe unless otherwise shown I� O Denotes 1/2 inch x 18 inch iron monument set ZI- -' marked by license no. 44110 I '• 1 1 `I I I ACOMA TRAIL RLS 46535 N Scale in feet 0 40 80 120 ONE INCH EQUALS FORTY FEET ALLIANT ENGINEERING QLICCT n nr n cur=Q CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on April 23, 2020, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public hearing to consider a request for approval for the subdivision of 6.4 acres into two single- family lots with variances for property located at 1641 W. 63rd Street (Nye Addition); Zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF), Planning Case File No. 2020-06 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed ands orn to before me this��-' day of , 2020. ON Kiwissen, Depu rk (Seal) Notary Publi JEAN M STECKLING d Nolary Publlo�Mkrie�ote womfift nep. r�a1,9M I 11p# Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records. information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City tices not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City tices not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, backing or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City tices not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to preparethis map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other Purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. ((TAX —NAME)) «TAX_ADD_L1» ((TAX ADD L2)) ((Next Record))((TAX_NAME)) aTAX_ADD_L1» ((TAX_ADD_L2)), Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, May 5 2020 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Consider a request for approval for the subdivision of 6.4 acres Proposal: into two single-family lots with variances for property located at 1641 W. 63rd Street (Nye Addition). Zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF). Applicant: Woody Love, Engel & Volkers Property Owner: Ann Nye Property 1641 W. 63rd Street Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following What Happens steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2020-06. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff by Questions & email at SAI-Jaff(&ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952-227- Comments: 1134. If you choose to submit written comments, please send one copy to staff in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign u I City Review Procedure: • SubdlVOlons. Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of Me application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all partment information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Reasonings land use and toile amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialhir dustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waves this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonimpresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged fo meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person • Bemuse the Planning Commission holtls the public hearing. the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Councilff you wish to have something to W included in the report lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Date & Time: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Consider a request for approval for the subdivision of 6.4 acres into two single-family lots with variances for property located at Proposal: 1641 W. 63'd Street (Nye Addition). Zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF). Applicant: Woody Love Engel & Volkers Property Owner: Ann Nye Property 1641 W. 631d Street Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following What Happens steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.cl.chanhassen.mn.us/2020-06. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff by Questions & email at SAI-Jaff(Mci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952-227- Comments: 1134. If you choose to submit written comments, please send one copy to staff in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions. Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feat of the subject Site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose Me public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Reasonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezoning, and lard use amendments from residential to commerciallindustrial. • Minnesota Stale Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding Moir proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any interested aerson(S). • Bemuse the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the apptimtion will be included in the report to the City CouncilIf you wish to have something to be inclutletl in the report lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification, PIN TAX NAME TAX _ ADD _LS TAX _ ADD _L2 SITEADD 256030280 JOSEPH J SCHIMML 10946 LEXINGTON DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344- 1751 PHEASANT CIR 254150041 IRENE TRICK 141 CHONG ZHONG RD ZUOYING CIS , - 162163RD ST W 252540090 NOAH 1 HANSEN 1541 CREEK RUN TRL EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-6500 1541 CREEK RUN TRL 257970020 JASON A LEPAGE 1610 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1610 63RD ST W 258050011 JAY MEYER 161163RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9001 161163RD ST W 257970010 AARON N MAKI 1616 W 63RD ST EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9002 1616 63RD ST W 256710120 CHRISTINE ANN BURY 1620 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9002 1620 63RD ST W 256710110 SOLUM AND CULLEN REV TRUST 1630 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9056 1630 63RD ST W 254150040 AMY EBERT HAGGERTY 1631 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1631 63RD ST W 254150012 ANN NYE REV TRUST 164163RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9001 1641 63RD ST W 258500080 ADELE M PINT 1641 KOEHNEN CIR E EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9015 1641 KOEHNEN CIR E 256070220 DESIREE ZIMMERMAN 1641 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1641 WOOD DUCK LN 256710100 WILLARD & SHIRLEY A JOHNSON 166063RDSTW EXCELSIOR, MIN55331-9056 166063RDSTW 254150011 YUNSHA HE 1661 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9001 1661 63RD ST W 256070210 ADAM JOHN PETERSON 1661 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1661 WOOD DUCK LN 256070200 MICHAEL T & LYSSA L CAMPBELL 1671 PINTAIL CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9098 1671 PINTAIL CIR 254150010 TRUST AGREEMENT OF ROBERT & PATRICIA DEV 1681 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9001 1681 63RD ST W 256070190 PHILIP C & MARGARET A MARSTON 1681 PINTAIL CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9098 1681 PINTAIL CIR 250032500 BETH M MASTEL 1690 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9056 1690 63RD ST W 256070120 ROBERT A & LINDA M GUNDERSEN 1690 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9093 1690 WOOD DUCK LN 258500090 KELLY CASSIDY 1691 KOEHNEN CIR E EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9015 1691 KOEHNEN CIR E 256070110 BART T & ANNETTE R ELLSON 1700 TEAL CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9097 1700 TEAL CIR 256070170 NEIL R & KATHLEEN CAULEY 1701 PINTAIL CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-3100 1701 PINTAIL CIR 256960020 VIJAY VENKATARAMAN 1710 TEAL CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9097 1710 TEAL CIR 258500100 JUDY K FORD TRUST 1711 KOEHNEN CIR E EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9050 1711 KOEHNEN CIR E 256070160 SHERYL K LARSON 1711 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9076 1711 WOOD DUCK LN 256070090 PAUL ORVIS TWENGE 1720 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9077 1720 WOOD DUCK LN 256960010 SUKO BUDIJONO 1721 WOOD DUCK CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9096 1721 WOOD DUCK CIR 256070150 NICHOLAS J WALSTROM 1721 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9076 1721 WOOD DUCK LN 250032100 DAVID W & DENISE K GERTEN 1730 63RD ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9004 1730 63RD ST W 256070050 MICHAEL A & KERRY K PUZAK 1730 WOOD DUCK CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9096 1730 WOOD DUCK CIR 256070070 BREE JORGENSON 1731 WOOD DUCK CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9096 1731 WOOD DUCK CIR 256070140 DAVID W & HOLLY A JUDD 1731 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9076 1731 WOOD DUCK LN 256030270 LOREN R NELSON 1740 PHEASANT CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9060 1740 PHEASANT CIR 256070040 THOMAS S MAPLE III 1740 WOOD DUCK CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9096 1740 WOOD DUCK CIR 256070080 KYLE J & BETH A DUCHSCHERE 1741 WOOD DUCK CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9096 1741 WOOD DUCK CIR 256070130 AMIT RAHMAN 1741 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1741 WOOD DUCK LN 256030170 DUANE F & LORI P ANDERSON 1750 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9064 1750 RINGNECK DR 256070030 PAMELA A HUDSON 1750 WOOD DUCK CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9096 1750 WOOD DUCK CIR 256030190 EUGENE GARVEY 1751 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9066 1751 RINGNECK DR 256030260 LEE R & MARCELLA A PETERSON JT LIVING TR 1760 PHEASANT CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9060 1760 PHEASANT CIR 256030160 PETER NOWLING 1760 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1760 RINGNECK DR 256070020 MICHAEL L PIPER 1760 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9095 1760 WOOD DUCK LN 256030290 MICHAEL & BEVERLY J MOSHIER 1761 PHEASANT OR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9060 1761 PHEASANT CIR 256030200 SCOTT D LAVOLD 1761 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9066 1761 RINGNECK DR 256030250 KEITH R & AMBER K BUTCHER 1770 PHEASANT CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9060 1770 PHEASANT CIR 256030150 DENNIS & SUSAN PIPAL 1770 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9064 1770 RINGNECK DR 256030300 THOMAS & KRISTINE STEINKAMP 1771 PHEASANT CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9060 1771 PHEASANT CIR 256030210 MARK D & KAREN F LEWIS 1771 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9066 1771 RINGNECK DR 253100091 KEITH A HAMBERG 1779 KOEHNEN CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9051 1779 KOEHNEN CIR 253100030 DOUGLAS & SHERRY SWANSON 1780 KOEHNEN CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9049 1780 KOEHNEN CIR 250033100 DAVID & SHERYL HUGHES 1780 LAKE LUCY RD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9025 1780 LAKE LUCY RD 256030240 DANIEL F & SALLY 1 GABLER 1780 PHEASANT CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9060 1780 PHEASANT CIR 256030140 JACQUELINE RAE SNYDER 1780 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9064 1780 RINGNECK DR 256070010 JENNIFER N LILLA 1780 WOOD DUCK LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1780 WOOD DUCK LN 256030220 AARON DAVID VANT 1781 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1781 RINGNECK DR 253100090 PATRICK L & STACY L WARD 1789 KOEHNEN CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9051 1789 KOEHNEN CIR 256030130 KRISTIN J MCMURTRY AND JOHN B MCMURTRY R 1790 RINGNECK OR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1790 RINGNECK DR 256030230 STEVE & D KAREN SOUDBASH 1791 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9071 1791 RINGNECK DR 253100070 IVAN CHIHANG LEE 1799 KOEHNEN CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1799 KOEHNEN CIR 256070180 HOME PARTNERS GA 2015 LLC 180 N STETSON AVE STE 3650 CHICAGO, IL 60601 1691 PINTAIL CIR 256030090 SARAH S BROWNE 1800 PHEASANT DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9072 1800 PHEASANT DR 256030120 TODD J & LESLIE K PEDERSEN 1800 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9064 1800 RINGNECK DR 253100080 TIMOTHY G & EUNICE C SWANSON 1801 KOEHNEN CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9051 1801 KOEHNEN CIR 256030100 SCHWARZINGER TRUST 1820 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1820 RINGNECK DR 256710070 BRUCE D & SUSAN K KOEHNEN 1830 KOEHNEN CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9049 6271 BLUE JAY CIR 256040240 TIMOTHY EDWARD CARLSON 1841 RINGNECK DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 1841 RINGNECK DR 256040190 JESSE JOHN BERTOGUAT 1870 PARTRIDGE CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9075 1870 PARTRIDGE CIR 256710080 THOMAS D & ERICA R KOEHNEN 5810 DIVISION ST UNIT UPPR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-3211 6280 AUDUBON CIR 250031700 ANDREA M DONOVAN 6251 CARDINAL AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9047 6251 CARDINAL AVE 256710030 CONNIE JO JENSEN 6270 BLUE JAY CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9008 6270 BLUE JAY CIR 256710020 KATELYN M PETERSON 6271 CARDINAL AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9047 6271 CARDINAL AVE 256710140 BARRY JOHN CONDA 6285 AUDUBON CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9000 6285 AUDUBON CIR 256710090 ELISE M KLING 6290 AUDUBON CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9007 6290 AUDUBON CIR 256710040 CAROLE J BIRCH 6290 BLUE JAY CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9008 6290 BLUE JAY CIR 256030180 KEITH J & MICHELLE M O'BRIEN 6290 CARDINAL AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9046 6290 CARDINAL AVE 256710060 BRETT PALMBERG 6291 BLUE JAY CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 6291 BLUE JAY CIR 256710010 DENNIS R OLDS 6291 CARDINAL AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9047 6291 CARDINAL AVE 256710130 ANTHONY J & GLORIANN SCHWARTZ 6295 AUDUBON CIR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9007 6295 AUDUBON CIR 250032200 GENE R & SHARON J TEWS 6300 CARDINAL AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9011 6300 CARDINAL AVE 250024300 JAMIE DALE 6320 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 6320 YOSEMITE AVE 257970030 JOEL P & MELISSAJ EICHERS 6340 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9034 6340 YOSEMITE AVE 250023700 HERBERT F & LEOLA M CLASEN 6351 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9044 6351 YOSEMITE AVE 250023500 TODD D BOGEMA 6371 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9044 6371 YOSEMITE AVE 250023200 HUE & CATHERINE J LAM JT REV LVG TRST 6401 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9036 6401 YOSEMITE AVE 250023300 CHARLES B HEBERT 6411 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9036 6411 YOSEMITE AVE 258050020 SCOTT L HENRY 6420 YOSEMITE AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9037 6420 YOSEMITE AVE 258050030 VICTORIA ANNE SIMPSON 6430 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9037 6430 YOSEMITE AVE 250022700 DONALD M & CAROL OELKE 6431 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9036 6431 YOSEMITE AVE 256850010 MICHAEL RISHAVY 6440 YOSEMITE AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9037 6440 YOSEMITE AVE 250022500 DAVID L PETERSON 6451 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9036 6451 YOSEMITE AVE 256850030 MARK R RANDALL 6460 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9037 6460 YOSEMITE AVE 256850040 KATHRYN J BERSCHEIT 6470 YOSEMITE AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9037 6470 YOSEMITE AVE 250033500 KENNETH ASHFELD 6480 YOSEMITE AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 6480 YOSEMITE AVE 257860010 RYAN WILLIAM YANKOUPE 6481 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9036 6481 YOSEMITE AVE 256850050 SUSAN JORGENSEN 6510 YOSEMITE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9038 6510 YOSEMITE AVE 256710050 ROBERT L & CELINE A DEPAUW REV TRUST PO BOX 250 SAINT BONIFACIUS, MN 55375-0250 1702 63RD ST W 220 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 Doug Roper: Why is that? ' Mayor Hamilton: Should we assess the area then to purchase the lot? I guess that would be the question. Where do we find the money to do that? Doug Roper: How big an area? Mayor Hamilton: I don't know. I'm not going to get into that but that would be the only way we could purchase it. Doug Roper: Well, I think that should be explored. You admit you made a mistake, I think you should explore ways of rectifying your mistake. Councilman Johnson moved, Mayor Hamilton seconded to approve the variance to allow Rober Pierce to build a single family home within the wetland setback on Lot 1, Block 1, Piper Ridge with the following conditions: 1. The home shall be granted a 10 foot variance to the front yard setback and shall be located 20 feet from the front yard lot line. 2. The entire drainage and utility easement area on Lot 1 shall be immediately protected with appropriate erosion control as approved by the City Engineer. 3. No construction activity or any alteration to the existing conditions ' shall be permitted within the drainage and utility easement. 4. Determine the Ordinary High Water Mark and maintain the lowest floor level 3 feet above the Ordinary High Water Mark and at a minimum elevation of 957. 5. Maintain natural contours as much as feasible. 6. Alternative #2 is the best alternative for placement on the site. 7. The home be 26 feet in width. All voted in favor except Councilman Geving and motion carried. Councilman Horn: Just for the record, I believe that the record shows that the only opposition to the previous motion was Councilwoman Watson. PHEASANT HILL 4TH ADDITION, TOM KLINGELHUTZ: A. WOOD DUCK LANE STREET CONNECTION. B. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM C. APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Barbara Dacy: The first item that's on the agenda is the street connection issue for Wood Duck Lane from the development to Yosemite Avenue. I, unfortunately have to start out my staff report with an apology. Included in 24 r 221 7 ty Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 ;he Council's packet was a letter that I sent to the neighboring homeowners in the area regarding the Council meeting tonight. If you read the letter you :ould infer that the applicant, Mr. Klingelhutz, is proposing the connection to Yosemite Avenue. That is not true. Mr. Klingelhutz has never proposed a :onnection of Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite Avenue. This item is being brought in front of the Council as a request from City Staff to clarify the original notion that was made in 1984 so I apologize to the developer. This is a City Staff initiated item for consideration. There are a number of reason why we :made this decision to have it on the agenda tonight and the first one was that in reviewing the Minutes, there seemed to be a lot of discussion about the traffic issues. People along Yosemite and people along 63rd Street. Since that time, the subdivision is building up. Traffic patterns are occurring. Lake Lucy Road has now changed it's alignment and it is now currently being improved and as the Council recalls it is not a cul-de-sac or will be in the process of being a cul-de-sac and Wood Duck Lane connection. During the Council's discussion, there was also debate as to whether or not there should be a decision made on the connection or if we should wait and see and consider it when the final phase of the 4th Addition of the Pheasant Hills Subdivision comes through. In any case, the motion that was reflected in the Minutes appeared to have said that Wood Duck Lane should be created as a cul-de-sac at that time so again, Staff is asking for clarification and also asking the Council to look at the possibility of extending Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite Avenue. What I would like to go through is some of the existing conditions about the connection. Where the eastern boundary of the property right now abuts Mr. Lyon's property on the east. The old Keenan farm which is not owned by Mr. and Mrs. Nye on the north. The ownership of the parcel is kind of a handle leg type of situation that extends to the east and Mr. Klingelhutz has ownership of 16 1/2 feet over to Yosemite Avenue. The Stoddard Addition subdivision in the southwest corner of 63rd Street and Yosemite was approved approximately 2 years ago. It created 4 lots. The southwestern lot of that, there was a platting restriction filed saying that lot is not buildable until utilities and street access is brought to it. As part of that plat, there was 16 1/2 foot easement reserved as a part of the Stoddard Addition. In that area, for extension to occur, a standard 28 foot width urban street within 33 feet of an easement will be very difficult. There probably will be an additional easement necessary from the Nye property. In summary, the disadvantages to the connection is that there is going to be easement acquisition from adjacent property owners and I know they are here tonight and I know some are in opposition of the extension. The advantages that Staff has looked at for the connection was that we have received calls from people on 63rd Street about the amount of traffic that is going into the development. If you look at the area map from the south and east, Yosemite Avenue to 63rd Street is the primary access into the subdivision whereas on the west side, there is Galpin Blvd., Pheasant Drive and now Lake Lucy Road. The Wood Duck lane connection would help disburse the traffic from the east and south. It wouldn't necessarily remove traffic but it would help disburse it better. Another advantage that we saw was that it would provide street access to the two landlock parcels. That being Mr. Ryan's property and Lot 4 of the Stoddard Addition. Finally, we looked at the cul-de-sac length. I have noted in my report and measured the distance from Lake Lucy Road to the end right here and that is approximately 1,700 feet. It could take another interpretation from Rinngneck Drive to the end of the cul-de-sac is about 1,050 25 222 City Council Meting - April 20, 1987 feet. I prepared the report in the sense that it would act for access for ' these properties and I chose the longer interpretation but it is following that they do have access out the Ringneck Drive and Pheasant Drive as well. Clarification on how the extension would occur. Who would be assessed? Who would receive benefit and so on? That, as you are all aware, would be conducted through a feasibility study. If the Counci would choose to make the connection, such a feasibility study would have to be authorize to look at how those issues are going to be addressed. Some homeowners like Mr. DeSantis already have frontage onto Yosemite. 'There could be a question there as to whether or not he is eligible for assessment, etc. so at that point, as far as the street connection issue, that concludes Staff's report. Mayor Hamilton: At this time, I would like to ask if there is anyone here from the public who would wish to make comment. If you do, please come up to the microphone, state your name and address and give us your comments please. Harry DeSantis: I live on Yosemite. I got a petition here with 35 names on it and I think the deal that you had approximately 2 1/2 years ago says that it would stop back there at Wood Duck. Now all of a sudden you turn around and change it and then you are going to come down to who is going to take advantage of about three homes. That's about all you could build in there and you're going to have to go back in there about two blocks to get a street from Mr. Klingelhutz' road out to Yosemite Avenue. Then out there you got a safety condition. If somebody is coming down Yosemite Avenue and if you're just coming up over the hill and right there, you're going to have a dangerous ' intersection. So I think everybody on Yosemite is very unhappy and I know Mark here, he has a lot of problems on Yosemite Avenue where cars land in his yard. A couple times in the last few years. outside down and almost in his house so it is a dangerous situation to put a street there. I was wondering who is going to pay for this street. Mayor Hamilton: It hasn't been determined yet. It's something that we would have to look at to see if benefitting properties would be assessed or just how it would be done. Harry DeSantis: 'that's about it. There are a few folks out here who would like to speak on it themselves so I won't take too much of your time. Mayor Hamilton: Harry, your petition is all people who are opposed to the extension of Wood Duck Lane back to Yosemite. Councilman Horn: How many households are represented in this petition? Harry DeSantis: Everybody on Yosemite Avenue and there are 3 or 4 in each family on some of them. They're all voters anyway. Mayor Hamilton: We were just wondering how many families. we don't have a house count of how many homes are there. Harry DeSantis: I could get that. You've got everybody who owns property I more or less is on there. W 223 Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 ' Charlie Hebert: I live at 6485 Yosemite Avenue. I would just like to state my feelings about the extension. I don't want it. I would just you to state your reasons. Lally, for what purpose, why does the City want that road? You already mentioned that you do have access out of this new development down to Lake Lucy and Lake Lucy now is going to become a major road. I walk the area all the time. I know there is access. We don't need the access. In terms of emergency response, police, fire, ambulance to this new development, there is plenty of acces. We don't need another access. It would really detract from our existing neighborhood. I would be looking out a road bisecting Harry's house and Twottles who live right next to him. There would be a road right inbetween two houses that has never been there and it's a little unsettling for me. I don't want to look down a road. I'm expecting a kid here shortly and he's going to be growing up with more traffic in front of the street than I care for already and now there will just be another additional street. I know the neighbors across the street have children and they don't want a street literally in the side of their yard. The safety considerations. The visual impact is negative and I just want to maintain the existing character of my neighborhood. We like it the way it is. We don't want a road going inbetween our neighbors houses. Mark Erlanson: I live at 6510 Yosemite. I'm the one, the cars already come racing down Apple Road that turns into Yosemite and they flip over and end up either in my driveway, my frontyard, the sideyard. It's just to the south of where this proposal is. The road goes from blacktop to gravel and my house is after it started in the gravel. I love it but we don't need any more traffic going down there. Unless you guys want to help me fix up my yard the next time the cars flip over. We don't need it paved. I love it the way it is but we don't need that much more traffic either with all the paved accesses that already there. ke Schmidt: I live on Yosemite also and I think there is plenty enough affic on the road now the way it is and we don't need another access on that Jim vonLorenz: 6371 Yosemite Avenue. I would like to address some other concerns. I think safety has been brought up. The speeds. The problems we've had on that road. I've been on there for 17 years on a dirt road up to what we have now. The road is taking a beating. Any more heavy duty trucks driving in there, it's going to deteriorate even worse. It's already becoming cracked and the surface is being eroded away. If Mr. Klingelhutz runs his heavy trucks in there another couple years trying to build on that next addition, that road is going to deteriorate down to nothing. Also, we like to walk and jog through that area. Yosemite has very little of any shoulders on it in many areas and we have to step off the road and it's almost straight down in many cases to get clear of the traffic that's already on there. I can address Harry's problems there. Also the fact, I'm right at the "4" of Yosemite and 63rd. It's going to double the traffic coming by my place. As I sit in my yard and I watch the traffic coming down 63rd to make the turn onto Yosemite, I would say only 2 out of 5 cars stop at the traffic stop sign there and you are going to have the same problem up there on Wood Duck Lane. Besides, Harry has his trees there to keep the dust away from his yard and it's going to be a blind intersection with no street lights. I think it's a 27 224 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 very dangerous situation that could be developed. I called one night when ' that car took out the telephone pole just down beyond Harry there and the deputy said he was doing close to 60 mph so it's a serious concern. With headlights coming off those intersections, without the trees there to protect you, you get headlights in your house at all hours of the night. As is on 63rd now, cars miss that intersection. I hear the screeching of tires and they put it in reverse, back up and go back up 63rd. These are all serious concerns that I think we all are looking at and hope the Council will give it their consideration. Mr. Twaddle: I live on 6430 right on the corner and I would just like to say I'm against it. I feel one of the reasons we moved in there, I know from the people who have already been there for a while, might not have liked it when we moved in either, but the location and everything is really pretty back there and with another road. I know Tom has a cul-de-sac back there and he wants to keep it and I know the people on 63rd might object to it because of the traffic. They might want to get rid of a few more cars but a cul-de-sac insures 3, 4 or 5 houses and for that many to build one more road, I just don't think it's worth it. Tom Nye: As you can see, I'm somewhat affected as 1,000 feet of my property borders the entire 4th Addition and Tom Klingelhutz has talked to me about this at one point. He said it was his plan on deadending it there and I guess if the City has a good reason to put a street through there, which seems to be , their intention, whatever they think is the best. However, I would also like to at some point in time be told how, they are going to have to get a little strip of land from me I think to do it and I would just like to be kept abreast of your plans on it. If that's what you want to do. Councilman Johnson: As I've said in the past, I'm concerned about long cul- de-sacs. Not from convenience of the neighbors but from public safety aspects Of having a cul-de-sac blocked during an emergency. How long is this cul-de- sac, Ringneck? Councilman Horn: 1,000 feet. Councilman Johnson: I've heard time and time again that people would prefer to live on a long cul-de-sac like this but at that point when an emergency happens and something happens where they have to escape, we don't have a Williams Pipeline caning through here or anything but that's my only concern for wanting to put it through. I do agree with most of the people on Yosemite as far as it's not an ideal place to put a street out onto Yosemite. I haven't heard anybody from 63rd Street. I was expecting somebody from 63rd Street to be here. Firma St. John: 1621 63rd Street and the reason was for having the traffic come off of 63rd Street and I think it has pointed out something to you from the comments that were made that there is a traffic hazard on 63rd coming onto Yosemite and that is the most concern. ' Councilman Johnson: You are concerned about the traffic on 63rd? 28 r 225 ty Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 LEhma St. John: On 63rd. uncilman Johnson: And this connection does what for you or to you? Emma St. John: It would take some of the traffic off of 63rd but I don't know how the speeding on the 63rd, which has been brought up is a problem over there too. ilman Johnson: So what we're trying to do is relieve 63rd Street for the rty owners there. Unfortunately that has the effect of increasing some is on Yosemite south of 63rd. People coming from the north. The people g from the south, I'm trying to see if I have this understood right? No. is shaking his head. Barbara Dacy: If you use 63rd or if you use the Wood Duck Lane connection, you are going to have to use Yosemite one way or the other. Again, it would disburse traffic. It would even out the traffic possibly between 63rd and Wood Duck Land. The Wood Duck Lane connection would provide access into the 4th Addition and probably an area to the west. It's sort of split in there depending on people's travel patterns and so on. Councilman Johnson: Do we have any traffic engineers who have looked at this and have made the best guesstimate of what all the traffic patterns are now and what they would change to be if this connection was made and if it's not? Barbara Dacy: The way we approached it is, the final plat application came in and in reviewing the case we felt that this was an issue that deserved special Council attention so we prepared an analysis albeit greek. We did not take on -site counts as you did on the Frontier Trail because Lake Lucy Road is under construction and everything is in disruption as to travel patterns. So to answer your question, no because we felt it was an item that we wanted clarification from the Council on. If there was strong feeling about retaining the cul-de-sac, then that additional study obviously would not be Councilman Johnson: Right now we don't really know what the full benefits or the full detriment is because we haven't done the total study. Barbara Dacy: No. We have not done a traffic study. Councilman Johnson: We would be looking to do a feasibility study that would have that part on it so our action tonight would not delay Tom on his subdivision. He may still get it approved, I can't say what will happen, but this will not affect, we would go ahead with the cul-de-sac for design right now and if we decide to go ahead with the feasibility study, what happens to this cul-de-sac? Barbara Dacy: I think in discussing that with the developer, he can't start on the initial phase of the 4th Addition. As they proceed east however, the timing is going to be critical. But in talking with the applicant, he can start. 29 226 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 Gary Warren: The most important part right now would be the watermain that is forced through to Yosemite but that would be in the existing easement that is already there. Councilman Johnson: That has to be done anyway. Gary Warren: Right. Harry DeSantis: What about the watermain? Where is it going to go? Gary Warren: The watermain is coming from the west along Wood Duck and go through the existing easement to the east. Harry DeSantis: Down the cartway? Gary Warren: Right. Harry DeSantis: We were the ones who paid and put all that water in there, how can he hook onto our water now? Councilman Johnson: It will actually make your water better. Harry DeSantis: You think so? Councilman Johnson: I won't say better in taste but distribution wise it will improve our water system. Tom Klingelhutz: We do pay for your line per unit charge. Each time we take out a permit we pay the City $650.00 for water so it is being paid for each time we take a permit out. Harry DeSantis: Nobody has been out there but 63rd is half dirt and Yosemite is half dirt. We don't need more traffic on that road. We're living in dirt now. Russ Stoddard: Who pays for that water? It isn't affecting anybody besides the developer if they put water from Yosemite through that road. Mayor Hamilton: The developer pays for it. Councilman Geving: Just a comment or two, I'm curious where this whole issue of extending Wood Duck Trail to Yosemite came from. I generally try to respond to people's requests to do something and I feel in this particular case that we really haven't made a case for extending it other than the fact that we did receive a petition here with about 13 names on it to push it through to Yosemite. At the same time, I've got another petition with approximately three times that number that are in disfavor of it. Now the petition for the people who are in favor of extending Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite all live on 63rd Street and I believe what they're thinking is that ' it will relieve the traffic on 63rd. I'm not so sure that's really true. I'm really am not sure that that will happen because the traffic that I see, at least from my sketch, would indicated that those people are going to travel 30 r- 227 ty Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 3rd anyway and they are still going to travel 63rd and pick up Yosemite and o south so I suspect that there isn't a real strong case, at least from my iewpoint, that it's going to reduce the traffic on 63rd. Again, I'm kind of be opinion that we don't have all the information we need in terms of who is oing to benefit if we do extend this. How is it going to be done? How is he assessment going to be accomplished? How are we going to acquire the and to pursue that road because obviously we're not going to get it easily rom the people who are here. So I think it's kind of an initiative that at is present time is best left the way it is. We've cul-de-saced it. We did it when the original plat came in. It seemed to be a reasonable thing to do uid until we get a majority of the people in the area there that really desire nd are willing to pay for the assessments of putting in that road, I rsonally can't see us doing that. I'm sensitive usually to people's wishes rid I think all the Council members are and in this case, the majority of the people are telling me that they don't need the road extended. That it's better off left just as it is. Until we build up that area and until we get some idea of what the traffic patterns are going to be. I don't know if that 1,700 foot cul-de-sac is such a bad thing. There are several ways out of there and I'm not convinced that we have all the information at this time to make a decision to extend that road. That's the extent of my comnent. Councilman Horn: First of all, I believe the Minutes that I read said that that was not a permanent cul-de-sac at the end of Wood Duck Lane. As I interpretted the Minutes, that was left for something that would be decided at ' a later point. As a matter of fact, there were several people on the Council at that time that thought it should not be a cul-de-sac because of the problems that cul-de-sacs can bring. When people see a finished cul-de-sac they tend to feel that it is permanent so it's not clear to me that it was ever decided that that would be a permanent cul-de-sac at that point. That this was something that was left for later decision. Also, it appears to me in looking through here that it's quite obvious that any traffic that went on Wood Duck Lane would be coming off from 63rd Street. It also appears to me that since you only have one way into this development which is Pheasant Drive, which comes off CR 117, I don't believe whether Wood Duck Lane is there or not, it's going to make any difference to anybody coming in on Pheasant Drive which means that all that will happen is people who come in Pheasant Drive will have the option of going on Wood Duck Lane or 63rd Street. So if you assume that is the same amount of traffic that goes through there, Yosemite is going to see the same amount of traffic whether we put this road in or not. The only difference is that the people between 63rd and Wood Duck will see less traffic because some of it will go Wood Duck and head south. Some of it will go 63rd and head north. None of those cars will go past the folks between those two and it seems to me that the real losers in this whole thing, with the exception of the DeSantis property, are the people who in future will be building along Wood Duck Lane. They are the real losers in this whole thing because they are going to have traffic going in front of their homes now that they didn't have before so from their viewpoint, they are going to be the big losers in this. People on 63rd will gain, as I see it. The people north of 63rd on Yosemite, won't see any change. The people south won't see any change. The people in the middle will see a slight improvement and the real losers are going to be Wood Duck Lane. I have some concerns about how this would go through here too and how it would match into Yosemite 31 228 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 but to me that's the bigger issue other than traffic. I think most of the losers haven't ' bought a house yet in Chanhassen. Councilman Boyt: I think we have to go into this realizing that Lake Lucy Road stops prior to getting into Wood Duck Lane. Everybody who is out here from the neighborhood agrees with that? Garry Warren: It connects to Wood Duck Lane. Councilman Boyt: Okay, so then Clark, I guess there are two ways in there. Mayor Hamilton: There are three ways actually. You can get in and off of CR 117, that Pheasant Drive. You can get in off of Lake Lucy Road onto Wood Duck Lane. You can get in off of 63rd onto Ringneck so there are three entrances. Councilman Boyt: So let me try this again, is it fair to say that with three entrances that that is residential traffic or is that shortcutting traffic? What kind of traffic do you find going through your neighborhood? Does anybody know? Residential traffic for the most part? Barbara Dacy: Yes. Councilman Boyt: Is there a reason why anybody would take that road if they weren't living there? 'Pon Klingelhutz: No. It's basically residential traffic. , Councilman Boyt: As it's developed, that's what we're looking at so we're looking at how does residential traffic flow through the neighborhood. I think that is one issue. Then what I'm hearing from the people who have spoken is an overwhelming concern that Yosemite is not a safe road. Is that right? What we're talking about is really the distance then between 63rd and what will be Wood Duck Lane as it comes out onto Yosemite. I didn't hear anybody tell me how, since this is residential traffic that's going to impact the traffic flow on Yosemite and I would be interested in our engineer or anyone for that matter could tell me what the impact is going to be on Yosemite of putting one more entrance there. Tom Nye: You're going to put 25 houses back in there, you are bound to get more traffic cutting through there. I agree with you that my land is 200 to 300 feet there along Yosemite, between 63rd and the proposed street. There are no homes there at all. It's not going to impact anybody. The only people that are concerned are the new homes built up toward the DeSantis residence and up in that area a couple three homes but I think when you're bringing the traffic off of Apple Road, up Yosemite to turn into Wood Duck, you're going to have an increased flow and you just can't get away from that. Councilman Boyt: There is going to be increased flow down something when you build 25 more hones. ' Tom Nye: It's much easier to come through Excelsiore, take a right on Apple Road to come up the hill. It's been happening. We've been watching. It's 32 229 ty Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 ' increasing and we're watching it right now. uncilman Boyt: I think what you're telling me is you are acceptable to aving more traffic come in along Pheasant Drive off of CR 117 and run through he residential neighborhood. am Nye: Or Lake Lucy Road. Councilman Boyt: But you're not acceptable to having that traffic come in from Yosemite. Tom Nye: I think it's quite a narrow strip. I tried to point that out to the Council before. Councilman Boyt: I went out and drove this and Jay said he was out there and I suspect maybe some of the other Council members went out to take a look at this on a first hand basis and Yosemite isn't an inviting place to walk. I agree with that. Tom Nye: That's true but we still do love to walk in the neighborhood and a lot of us do. Councilman Boyt: Right. Now, I know first hand the trauma of living on a cul-de-sac that is put through. I find it absolutely amazing that Mr. Geving ' would tell me that he could live with a 1,000 foot cul-de-sac or a 1,700 foot cul-de-sac when it's just been a matter of a few months since the Fire Department lined the back wall and said that that was ridiculous and the Council at that point voted 5-0 to put the cul-de-sac through. Councilman Geving: I won't respond to that. Councilman Boyt: When I look back to 1983 or 1985 or 1984, a few years and look at this, I agree with Mr. Horn that it was never intended that Wood Duck Lane stop where that 4th Addition stops. I see the issue as one of dealing with residential traffic and a difficult situation. I agree with you that putting more traffic on Yosemite is dangerous. I don't see how you are going to put less traffic on Yosemite no matter what you do here. When we add 25 more houses here, we are going to add more traffic someplace and some of that traffic is going to be on Yosemite. I don't see an alternative that says it won't be on Yosemite and I think we do have a concern and I agreed several months ago, we had a concern with how do we get emergency vehicles into a 1,000 foot cul-de-sac that doesn't have a backdoor and those 25 homes or whatever that are going to be built in there, are not going to be happy if they come back in here two years from now to try to extend that road then and they are not going to be as safe if we don't. Did you say 22? okay, 22. Mayor Hamilton: I think pretty near everything has been said that I could possibly say. The only thing that I would like to add to it is Yosemite is of course a very unsafe street and I could see a connection going in there once Yosemite is paved. 'here has been some requests by some of the citizens living there to pave Yosemite and we don't have the funds at the present time. We spent a lot of our MSA funds tonight on Hesse Farm Road so when we are back 33 230 City Council Meeting - Apri 20, 1987 in a position where we have some funds to spend, I know Yosemite is going to , be one of our high priority roads to look at to pave. It would seem to me that that would be the time to look at making the connection although I think Bill has a very good point when he says, if you do that, if you put it off for a period of 2 to 3 years, the people who are living on Wood Duck Lane and the other cul-de-sacs in that vicinity are then perhaps not going to want the connection to go through because the traffic may increase through their neighborhood. At the same time, everybody wants growth and you like to add to your tax base to decrease everybody's individual tax burden but nobody wants the traffic. Nobody wants to have a neighbor but it seems if we're going to have development, we also have to have neighbors and we have to have traffic and somehow we have to live with it so it's a difficult issue and I honestly don't recall what decision was made when this thing was discussed in 1984 but I would have to suspect that we did not intend for this road to end permanently in the cul-de-sac at Wood Duck Lane. That it was the intent of the Council at that time to have it go through to Yosemite. Again, it would seem to me that the time to put it through would be when Yosemite is improved. When it's paved and put some curb and gutters in there and you can do the job right. 'those are my only comments. Councilman Johnson: Has our Fire Department commented on this? I know our new public safety director is pretty fresh. Has this been brought before the Public Safety Commission? Barbara Dacy: No it has not. , Councilman Boyt moved, Mayor Hamilton seconded to table the Wood Duck Lane street connection until a proper traffic study report and the Public Safety Director has had a chance to review it. All voted in favor of tabling the motion and motion carried. PHEASANT HILL 4TH ADDITION: FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. Barbara Dacy: Basically we're recommending approval of the final plat even in dispite of your action on the previous item. We have noted that the area between the cul-de-sac and Yosemite, will still be reserved as public right- of-way to provide access for the utilities that will be going across there and would provide a limited amount of right-of-way for street access for the other parcels in that area so we are recommending approval subject to our standard conditions of submitting the financial security and execution of the development contract. Councilman Boyt: Block 1, Lot 2, it's under 11,700 square feet. Mayor Hamilton: It's 11,392 according to the plat. Councilman Boyt: And I think 11,700 square feet, I'm trying to recall the former Ordinance. Barbara Dacy: The application was processed under the Planned Unit ' Development Ordinance which has since then been revised but at that time there was not an established minimun standard. 'there are lot sizes elsewhere 34 r II 231 City Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 in the development that are below the 11,700. 11,700 came from another part ' of our Subdivision Ordinance at that time. It was loosely used as a reference point but what you see there has been approved by the Planning Commission and Council and in fact, they did drop a lot of those in this particular addition so there is no conflict there at this point. Councilman Johnson: Is Outlot A, is that a future connection to another subdivision? Barbara Dacy: To the south yes. Councilman Johnson: I'm glad to see that. Tom Klingelhutz: We don't own the property to the south but left a place for a road but our plan is based on that road. Councilman Johnson: Barbara, is that property to the south, is that all under one ownership all the way down to Lake Lucy or do you know? Tom Klingelhutz: Yes, it belongs to a may by the name of Currico. We didn't bother to tell Mr. Palmer who lives in the house right off Lake Lucy Road but that's not inside the sewer line. Councilman Johnson: So we're not looking to having a fourth interest coming through his new subdivision in the very near future at all? Councilman Geving moved, Mayor Hamilton seconded to approve the final plat for Pheasant Hill 4th Addition subject to submission of the appropriate financial securities and execution of the development contract and that Takoma Trail street name be changed. All voted in favor and motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA: PHEASANT HILL 4TH ADDITION, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Councilman Johnson: Actually I had a page and a quarter which our City Engineer helped me go through and answered most of my questions. I was out there looking at this. I wanted it to be noted that grading has already been started in there. That earth movers are going. Silt fences are up but not up properly and not the type that we're looking for. I don't like see developers start before we have... Mayor Hamilton: There might be a reason for that. Councilman Johnson: I would like to know if there was a reason for that. I know it was put a stop to about a week ago by our City Engineer. We've got several wetlands right there that I'm very concerned for. The one on Mr. Nye's property and the one to the south of you. We've got to get very serious with these silt fences. There is a dump site existing. I finally found the Chanhassen dump site. I've been very proud of this town. In 6 years I have not found a dump site in this town but unfortunately have finally found one on what I believe is approximately the area of Block 1, Lots 5 and 6. There is some old refrigerator, a couple stoves, a couple clothes washers, mattresses, box springs, destruction debris and I want to add a condition for the approval 35 404 City Council Meeting - April 29, 1987 that the material be removed there, such as the washer and stoves. The , concrete blocks and stuff make good fill. I don't want washing machines and this stuff to end up buried in people's yards. Tom Klingelhutz: It was not me that put them there. Councilman Johnson: You own it now. You bought it right along with the property unfortunately. Gary actually answered most of my concerns. Mayor Hamilton: At this time I would like to ask Tom to respond to the questions that you raised. Tom Klingelhutz: You were there Saturday I heard. You also talked to Mr. Schumo who lives on Pheasant Circle. We were moving dirt on their property and also we dug down along the swamp to find out how much bad dirt is there. When we had it dug out, we filled it with clay. We didn't move very much dirt. I have put the silt fence up some time ago because I was concerned about dirt washing in there from last year's construction. I know it's not what you really want but it was something and I certainly will make it better. I's real concerned about the lowlands myself. Very much so. Mayor Hamilton: What about the question about the refrigerators and things on the property. Tom Klingelhutz: They were there when I bought the property and some of them I have trees that are 4 inches in diameter growing right up through them. I certainly can take them out of there and have then hauled away. Tom Nye: There is some question about the inability of water to pass through my property and make it's way onto Lake Lucy. There used to be a drain tile that drains into his property that has subsequently been dammed up and a lot of it is sitting in there now. It has nowhere to go. With no rainfall at all, you can see it hasn't moved. It will never be dry in there. There are two ponds that you dynamited I don't know how long ago and those will always be there but now it has spread all out and it has no way to make it's way to Lake Lucy and Lake Ann. Just something I wanted to point. It's going to fill up pretty bad in there and it will affect the back lots of his property at some point in time. Mayor Hamilton: Are you familiar with that Tom? Gary Warren: I was out to visit Tom's site earlier and also have been talking with Tom Klingelhutz about it. The old drain tile scenario I guess is one that is hard to put specific facts on but as Tom admits, the property maybe it's higher now than what it was as far as water ponding but it always has been wet to a certain degree. We have a storm sewer that is on the property line as a result of the 2nd and 3rd Addition improvements out there that I haven't had a chance to get back to Tom about but in talking with Tom Klingelhutz, he's agreeable to allowing drain tile to be tapped into that outlet there. We wouldn't drain that pond completely, which I don't think you want but it would provide a high water outlet for Tom so we hope to work with the two Toms to try to make that work out. 36 400 ty Council Meeting - April 20, 1987 ' Tom Klingelhutz: If there doesn't get fixed there is going to be a potential problem. If we had a hard rain, he would probably lose about half his r Hamilton: So you are agreeable to work out the problem? Klingelhutz: Yes. There's no problem. r Hamilton: Is that alright with you Tom? Nye: Right. It's been dry so I haven't had a problem but if we do get rain, it's going to be a problem for not only me but for him and his Hamilton: But you agree to work with Tom Klingelhutz to resolve the Nye: Absolutely. ncilman Johnson: On your back property line where you put your new fence, that your property line? Torn Nye: No. It's in. Councilman Johnson: It's in a little ways because the water right now, as of Saturday, was beyond that fence. Tom Nye: I waded through the water to put the fence up. Councilman Johnson: I think your disposal site on the south side is already filled. The area marked as disposal site seems to be pretty darn full right now with the little bit of moving you've already done. I think we've got it retty well. I talked to Gary about silt fencing on the north side to make sure that we protect Mr. Nye's pond. I'm sad that we're going to lose as many trees on this one as we are. Klingelhutz: We're going to try to keep every tree we can. We're not 3 to site grade entirely back to the lots. The sites we have, as we build as and try to preserve as much as we can out there on the house sites. Johnson: So you will individually grade the lots to the pads? Klingelhutz: We will individually grade them as the houses are sold. Hamilton moved, Councilman Horn seconded to approve the plans and fications for Pheasant Hill 4th Addition. All voted in favor and motion ' ST VILLAGE HEIGHTS, 112 MILE NORTH OF WEST 78TH STREET, BILL JACOBSON: A. SUBDIVISION OF 24.1 ACRES INTO 3 LOTS OF MULTIPLE FAMILY. 37 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Ken Ashfeld <KAshfeld@maplegrovemn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 8:22 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Cc: Ken Ashfeld Subject: Nye Addition Sharmeen, Thank you for the opportunity to comment relative to the proposed Nye Addition, which is adjacent and north of the property owned by myself and my wife, Barb Ashfeld. Please accept these comments and extend same to the Chanhassen Planning Commission and City Council as you deem appropriate. I can't guarantee my attendance at the Planning Commission meeting but if you think it important that I attend, please let me know. Firstly, let me state that being new to the community, I am stating what I understand to be factual from what I have heard from neighbors, the applicant and other prospective buyers of the Nye property. We have enjoyed the couple years that we have been here, enjoyed the open spaces and the excellent planning that is exemplative of the City of Chanhassen. Obviously, you and the city staff, Planning Commission and City Council have been at creating a great city for a long time, and it shows. However, we live on a large acreage parcel which takes a lot of upkeep and adding new neighbors would be welcomed. It is my understanding that it has been the goal of the City to extend Wood Duck Lane to Yosemite for a long time. That appears obvious from the design of the Pheasant Hill development with limited access and extensive truncated streets, inclusive of Wood Duck Lane. I believe the long term planning of the area is sound, assuming that it was feasible to extend Wood Duck to Yosemite. The extension of Wood Duck would facilitate the public safety needs of the Pheasant Hill neighborhood. The current property owners adjacent to Wood Duck, at Yosemite, has indicated to a previous potential buyer of the Nye property that their expectations for compensation for additional right of way makes the extension of Wood Duck unfeasible if only the Nye property and our property is responsible for the cost of acquisition and building all the infrastructure. We do not care to be an obstructionist to the objectives of the Nye family but from my view of the proposal, and if approved, the objective of extending Wood Duck Lane is no longer possible. Although it is admirable that they are comprehending the needed right of way from their property, there remains an encumbered right of way extending east to Yosemite. There would no longer be a need or desire for the Nye property to want to extend the roadway. From my understanding, it has been envisioned that our property could create three additional lots and from my 42 years of City planning and engineering, I would concur. Having said that, the three lots would incur the cost of single sided benefit, which most developers attempt to avoid, and certainly could not take on the cost of right of way acquisition and the extension of Wood Duck. Essentially, Wood Duck Lane would forever remain a very long truncated roadway causing the overall master plan to not be realized and resulting in lack of public safety access to the Pheasant Hill neighborhood, which is the fundamental principle of urban planning. It is not my nature to point out a problem without offering a potential solution. Our access currently consists of a private drive under approval and agreement with the City. The ongoing maintenance and snow removal is recognized to be our responsibility. It is, my suggestion that if the City wishes to approve the Nye Addition, it is also memorialized that our property could subdivide under a PUD process whereby four lots would have access via a private drive over the existing right of way, reconstructed to City PUD private drive standards. In effect, the existing 33 foot right of way would support a 20 foot drive. The four parcels would be encumbered with a Reciprocal Operating Agreement "RDA" filed as a covenant on the properties to required the administrator of the ROA, myself and successors, to maintain the drive to the acceptance of the City or, if in breach of contract, allow the City to maintain with costs special assessed to the four properties with right of appeal waived. Furthermore, a paved connection to Wood Duck Lane would be constructed to provide access for public safety vehicles and bicycles/pedestrians from the Pheasant Hill to Yosemite. I believe this would accomplish the objectives of all interested parties, in that: • The Nyes would be afforded what they are requesting. • The City would have public safety access that doesn't currently exist, and probably never will. • Current residents along Yosemite are not required to lose property to additional right of way. • The Pheasant Hill neighborhood would have bicycle/pedestrian access to Yosemite and safer access to downtown Excelsior without having to navigate Highway 7 and busy intersections. • It is my understanding that the Pheasant Hill neighborhood is opposed to extending Wood Duck Lane for vehicular traffic. • Provide development potential for our property. Without some solution to reasonable access, our property is being denied the ability to subdivide that all properties surrounding us have enjoyed. The properties involved present a very difficult planning scenario and although not wanting to be a critic of the overall planning, the end result is our property becomes deprived and is not able to be in compliance with the comprehensive plan for the a rea. I realize that it is unfair to present all of this to the Planning Commission and City Council without a specific proposal from us. This has all come on so quick and differently than what I was led to believe and expected. I only wish to state that the approval of the Nye Addition closes the option of extending Wood Duck Lane without financial contributions from the City and exercise the right of eminent domain to acquire additional right of way. Our property will simply remain a large acreage parcel with a single residence. Being new to the community doesn't mean that I am new to the issues created by development. Sharmeen, you, the Planning Commission and City Council take on a difficult task on a daily basis planning for the creation of a vibrant community. You have all succeeded! If I can answer any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at my office at 763-494-6351 (direct) or cell at 612-581- 8716. Ken Ken Ashfeld 6480 Yosemite Excelsior, MN 55331 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Adam Peterson <adam@klardig.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 12:47 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Nye Addition (1641 W. 63rd St.) Subdivision and Variance Hello Sharmeen AI-Jaaf, I am writing regarding this proposed development that keeps rearing its head... I live at 1661 Wood Duck Lane, and we bought our home because it was on a Cul-de-sac, why do we as a homeowner have to lose this value to our home so someone can build on a poorly broken out property. I have 2 young children who ride bikes, fly kites, play soccer and basketball out there all the time, and I hate to think of all the construction equipment driving by. I just had our home painted, and who will pay for repainting after all the dust is kicked up from digging/grading/trucks hauling dirt in front of my home? That's why I left Minneapolis. I watched this with the McDonald development of Pheasant Hills Park. Construction debris blown all over the place, materials left haphazardly in piles, and no concern for the roadways covered in muck and mud as they enter and exit the site. It is still a mess over there even though more than half the homes are occupied. The property for sale has access, and that should remain the access going forward. Developers can try to by the 2 smaller properties adjacent to the lot on the east for future development, but they sure don't need to backdoor via my quite street. I heard talk of a large retaining wall being built into the hill, does that mean I can't let my kids just run outside and play for fear someone is going to climb this and potentially fall? I know of a couple of shared driveways in our area and see no reason why this property couldn't be developed the same way. Thank you, Adam Peterson Project Manager AA War Did se C*=*,__ "Construction services that suit you" Direct 612.260.5757 1 Mobile 612.327.69211 Fax 612.260.5754 1 klardig.com Klar Dig Construction, Inc. 1 632 Mendelssohn Ave. N. I Minneapolis, MN 55427 I I I 63RD / I / I I I I I I u 0 40 80 160 SCALE IN FEET NYE ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNES 0 TA 3 STAR N rc < 19 05 LL OR. City SMITHR g rc HGII � ? ECHO ELDER LRO r r (� +f' LIIIAN S y\ � w d d tR ROE AYE V Jm Jy,�y �� RIDGE P01 T 66 OR ° y Ch Lake q�°yY��'Qo'p � Lake q i u.owsr �v m ED = �GALPIN LA. BRACKETTS RD. A, sr TP 3l > < z L inU e a, NiOy ,T MURRAY ST. m CHRIST M �ZA'^ m 7 3304 AS LA. VA 7• �p�Oq 5 dyg 5 aRONER SMA70RD #� 0 q0. a: ,-. 9J�Iq YE � u g � PL.. uUC LA. 4 N MANpR } a' k H LIEN ,� ] 1K1D LA. .3, 4 KOEHNENz KOE NEN qtE EK y 64TH 41 C1�'Y SOMMER GATE I CIR. W. a CIR. Em ti0REy7 ST. 4 y o .pSTElIARB a m BJrE ST. TON S I, VIEW Y ILL i Si. i ¢ S�.'�'vr Oit. g 86 i CT. ,SNH GO TEt� gS PLEASANTP 113. ARLINGTON CT. ii RIDGE < < 0 Ef ST. r CRESTWEWo 'R. TEPo z 4 ATTON i Q4r LL z q 44 CRESTMEW R g s OCT. ai i MN EUND .q 49FA,IYgy R i R. IUCY L LAKE LUCT R0. �556O CT. Yy, I.DR. .� .�'� � Lucre Ro. $ s �Y 0 i A 1� � "W p EWP s ru 9 Si 41ENAN- PQ� ¥NAP T` 0.O. HIGH GALE OT t,' Y1- <CT. 7 a 91 4'' OOAH WE9IERN DR. = g' �2 Y9p-E, �JG{ CIR. i LANE vDGy LER CT w 8 't' yi �4� rn OR HIAWATHA OR. ,.* >y CARVER BEACN RD. 5 C GRUBr j (�� M C 00 i CREE DR. Cb J HI ,(F' < TW P Q' 4 N-f• PR 0 p5 F rc tr`R '4y 'rF EM ERA L C,lLO` C� 0 �O �p CT'WiNr '�ppN R SA ¢ HipY O 4 R0. SPQ PY.P j IA A 6 LONE EAGLE OR.C' m OR ,y.SEH LA ¢ KER BER 6' 9 W00D HILL OR. W oe5 Ei ,k%`0 Lake L !I"F G' ' �. j As. CASCADE GR. 49. SHASTA CIR. W. c 3 p 75 LUE JAY CIR. lR 62 H RISONLa SO. SHASTA OR. E. A.C' 6: �PGPCMIAC �" T3 VOUBON CIR. uLA, fU c1� NILL CT. 51. OLYMPIC CIR. o 9 EAL OR. QQQ 2 y 52. CASTLE RIDGE CT. UTICA LA AR1RIpCE GR. (� p1CNNT 3' RED FO% 5]. CASTLE RIDGE PSI ADa01a CS ITETAIL RIDGE CT. 00.. CiTf'j y'`' 64. NAVAJO DR. BUTTE CT. 5C� OLET CIR. K 65. BROKEN ARROW DR. 71 CJIE HEASANT CIR. 41 Z} p. l"�,y 66. RED W1NC CT. On�I� 3 /Eq BJ. CHAPARRAL CT. wN LONGE0.N 4Ct� DR. 88. NEZ PERCE CT. Lake An A DR. e�pU pS_ Sq, 69. PIMA BAY J7. SADDLEBROOK PASS g3 w q1 CT. 1R� 72. CHIPPEWA M. < 1J1. ARBORETUM NLLAGE GR. p MAJESTC WAY u WK CH U. 172. ARBORETUM NLLAGE PL gIMV HILL S o: 73. BELNONT LA. GV PL -P j V 0 74. DERBY DR. BADD- O/�V E t7A ARBORETUM NLLAGE LA.. Ci� i AR < WE PIL AGE ST. 6q,q Z 76. PREAKNE55 LAIR. Q IP`EW v. T 74. ARBORETUM MLLAGE CV. 8 NKER ST. 0 77. PIMLICO LA. m01 CH DR. c.NY CiNTlrA'I TR Pl<,5 4 NUT CURVE g 78. LAREDO LA. CHANHASSEN 79IROQUOIS ST. i2,. DR. 80. SANTA FE GR. Wi pRF ^Y RY R. & R �n ,^� 2010 POP. 22,9552 109. SPOONBILL CIR 00 CT 1T8. ^? 3 112. NIa10LA5 WAY W. M AGE RD. U^' 1TT. ARB OREfD� Y glS:' ^ �WAYE'RRy CMq<GRY WAY 121. KIMBERLY LA. I� SANTA 12. i rMLL SLS C1n POPPY DR. T50. WATER LEAF PL 1 CltSv, iO '° JP JBth a �JO <� 150. SAGE IA /22. KELLY CT. ,R J&n HOII C ! S Q �q ARBORETUM R1 ST, CURVE CORPORATE m E Y 1 PARK op Q W. LW. L z IS M GLRYNN CT, PICHA DR. VICINITY MAP SCALE: 11'=2000' SHEET INDEX NO. COVER SHEET 1 DETAILS 2-3 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY 4 PRELIMINARY PLAT 5 SITE PLAN 6 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 7 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 8 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS 9 STREET AND SANITARY PLAN AND PROFILE 10 TREE CANOPY COVERAGE PLAN 11 LANDSCAPE PLAN 12 OWNER ANN NYE - TRUSTEE 1641 63RD ST. W CHANHASSEN, MN. 55331 CONTACT: ANN NYE EM: annnye@q.com APPLICANT ENGEL & VOLKERS 18202 MINNETONKA BLVD SUITE 100 DEEPHAVEN, MN. 55391 PH: 612-695-3001 CONTACT: WOODY LOVE EM: woody@woodylove.com CONSULTANT ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 MARQUETTE AVENUE SUITE 700 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 PH: 612-758-3080 FX: 612-758-3099 ENGINEER MARK RAUSCH LICENSE NO. 43480 EM: mrausch@alliant-inc.com SURVEYOR PETER D. GOERS LICENSE NO. 44110 EM: pgoers@alliant-inc.com ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Q Z O N LLJ 0 z LLJ C fn a W Z a L) I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE a 5� J Z LL W a W Z WAWA NII cc O a U 'Tat this plan, ,eport was or under my and that I ed GINEER under itate of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 219-0083 1 SHEET 1 of 12 ` Street PL D&U Variable I Easement 6' Metal fence post j Variable denoting Curb box, I tap 6" pointed blue. Curb box with t 114" standpipe and sto lanory rod - ' 1' z Water Service P 1" 10 PE/HDPE or PEX Pipe 200 PSI rating u� I n I"XT" Corporation Cock t Concrete brick support , 1 min. size 3" thick & 32 Sq. In. _._Water Main N 1. Do not plug end of curb stop. 2. Add 6" crimped pigtail to curb etop. 3. The service tine between the main shutoff Corp and curb box shall be one continuous sitemlees piece of pipe, couplers will not be permitted 4. Corporation cock to be of the quick compression type as stated in section 2,11 of the watermatn specifications. 5. All tops require use of stainless steel saddles on all mains. 6. Soddles shall be Smith Blair 371-372 or approved equal as per section 2.14 of the watetmoin specificotions.. 7. Install Tracer Wire System as per Detail Plate 5505. CC17OF TYPICAL WATER SERVICE REVISED: 12--LEI ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLATE NO.: 10OrJ FILE NAME:G_ ENG SPECS 1005 EPrro/ct/or 1 Outside Pipe Diameter Compacted native fill material/95% proctor f MNDOT 3149.28 p ' MNDOT 3149.2H Varies Embedment Material MNDOT 3149.2E NOTES: 1. A soils Engineer will be required to determine the depth of the pipe foundation embedment material if needed. Pipe foundation material shall be in accordance with MNDOT 3149.2H course filter aggregate. 2. P.V,C- bedding shall be MNDOT 3149.2E select granul ar borrow with 100% passing a 3/4" sieve, and less than 10% passing a NO. 200 sieve. ... Trench slopes shall conform to current OSHA rules and regulations for excavations and trenches. CITY OF PIPE BEDDING CMSEN FOR P.V.C. PIPE KED ?1 to ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLATE NO.: CL uo Z a iE RN w J SERVICE MARKERS MALL BE METAL TEE POSTS INSTALLED FROM INVERT TO 3" ABOVE FINISH GRADE TOP 6" PAINTED GRERL(SEE NOTE $2 BELOW) OVERLAP ON TEE POS WYE PLUGGED 45 DEGREE BEND 6' PVC SDR-25 PIPE MIN. SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT _- `-T/2 WE DIAMETER MIN, SANITARY SEWER GRAVITY MAIN NON TES" 1. SOLVENT WELD ALL JUNTS. (NON GASY.ETEQ) 2. WHEN SANITARY SEWER SERVICE IS NOT ACCOMPANIED BY A WATER SERVICE IN THE SAME TRENCH, NSTALL A HEAVY METAL TEE POSTS FROM INVERT TO 3' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND PAINT TOP 6' OF POST FLUORESCENT GREEN PAINT. 3. CLEANOUT R€OUIRED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY IF DISTANCE FROM MAIN TO HOUSE EXCEEDS 90 FEET. 4. ALL PIPE SHALL BE BEDDED *4 GRANULAR BEDDING (3149.2-1`) O2 COURSE FILTER AGGREGATE (3149.2-H). 5. INSTALL TRACER WIRE SYSTEM PER SPECS - DETAIL PLATE 5507. 6. WHEN A SIDEWALK OR TRAIL IS PRESENT IN THE BLVD. THE SERVICE MAY BE EXTENDED INTO THE D&U EASEMENT NTH THE CITY ENGINEERS APPROVAL. CROF TYPICAL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE { LESS THAN 16' DEEP) REVISED: 11 19 PiATE not ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2001 PL CL PL 30' N 6" Topsoil, Seedy & Mulch or Sod. Drointiie Surmountable - Concrete Curb Wear Course to be 1/2' Above Edge of Gutter t } { 2,07 2.0% ' I 1- 2--MNDOT2360 SPWEA340 It�lt'') ����L,, Taek Coot - 2357 2"--MND0T 2380 SPNWB33OC 12" Ctoss 5 Aggregate Base 24" UNDOT 3149,26 Select Granular Barrow (*See Note 7) Not t0 scale t Typical rigtlt-of-way-610. 2. Maximum street grade T= 3. Minimum street grade 0,75%. 4, 6" Topsoil placed In disturbed areas... 5. 2 Rolls sad behind curb. 6. The bituminous wearing surface shell be placed the next ConsWetion season following placement of the bituminous base. 7. A test roll of the prepared subgrode shall be performed. in the presence of a city Inspector. The city has the authority to require additional subgrode correction based on the test roil. 8. DraNltife shall be placed along both sides of roadway. See plate 5232 for details. MOF TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL STREET SECTION Re1nsED: 3-19 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLATE No: ENGINEERING FILE. NAME:G: ENG\SPEC3\5200 0 Add mastic between frame and rMas-, SECTION VIEW Minimum thickness of precast base is 6" for 14' deep Re less. and IoCTeases l' In thickness for every 4• of depth greater than 14'_ Manhole casting, lid and adjusting rings (sea PloUs 2110 & 2111) Provide I&I bonier an oli sonfluey sewer manhole(ses plate 2109) 6' Coaamda collar -All plats In manhole to have `o"ring rubber zaskats and fall -shield external seals at a'd and Cana Section joints on sanitary applications or approved equal. A maximum of 2 short manhole Reiss to be used directly blow cone section Pipe shag be cut out flush with Inside face of wag. Kor-o-seal required Precast inverts must be 1/2 of pipe diameter and benches sloped 2" toweof the hvert NO Kw 1..-n-seal manhole or equal considered acceptable alternate. 2. All dog houses shall be grouted an inside and outside. 3. When the manhole structure is constructed outside the trawled roadway a wiNsss post and sign (MH) shout be Installed next to the manhole. 4. Minimumof 2-V adjusting rings, max'enum of 3 ad)usiing rings or a Total of ✓T• of stock height far new construction. 5. No steps shall be Iost*UM! in manholes. CM OF STANDARD SANITARY C8AK81>SSEN MANHOLE REwsED: 11-19 PLATE NO.: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2101 FILE NAME: G. ENG` SPECS` 2101 Distance to t.. vwiotlJe T f 2"r P Top Bituminous Material t/2"r A BTaPe as 3 4' it e h R �8"� 14" Mni}OT B61B �Cancrete Cann and Gutter 6" 1 D` rtance to vorideligir 1/2"r-\ I 3"r 1i2'�r -Top f3fluminous Material slope m ',J $" per Mnt)OT 8612 R Concrete Curb and Gutter 12" E Use Only with Private Driveways, Parking Lots, or Medlans. _.. 2B R 12"R 16" Top Bituminous Material 68"RI 'T}�--..•..1/2" a� A.ry 17 1f2" Surmountable Concrete Curb and Gutter' q2B" e I Ay 01tUminou5 surface --- N =►I2 Bituminous Curb l .. - '.` 4" Shore Formed I ty... . fT CITYOF TYPICAL CURB mom AND GUTTER +i_TISR) 1T-16 C+EPARTMENT ENOINEET.MG " 5203 HLE NAME G.AFNG\SPECSv5207 1&1 BARRIER REQUIRED ON SANITARY STRUCTURES ON SEE DETAIL 2109 25"-.5" 2' BIT. WEAR _2" BIT BASE IIN. 2-2"ADJ. RINGS TAX. 3 ADJ. RINGS 6" THICK CONCRETE COLLAR NOTE: 2-PIECE COVER RISER RINGS ARE NOT ALLOWED. BIT. WEAR COURSE ADJ, DETAIL MANHOLE CASTING & LID AS BE PER DETAIL 2111. MANUFACTURES SEALANT --% I BETWEEN FRAME AND RINGS Idd BARRIER REQUIRED ON 27.. SANITARY STRUCTURES ONLY SEE DETAIL 2109 VARIES �,..--- BITUMINOUS BASE OR BINDER HDPE, EPP OR PRECAST CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS 6" THICK CONCRETE COLLAR BIT. BASE OR BINDER COURSE ADJ. DETAIL NOTES: 1. PRECAST CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS SHALL BE BEDDED WITH 1/4" TO 1/2" MORTAR. 2. HDPE AND EPP ADJUSTING RINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH MANUFACTURES SEALANT OR APPROVED EQUAL. 3. ALL ADJUSTS SHALL INCLUDE NEW RINGS FROM CASTING TO CONE. 4. WOOD SHIMS NOT PERMITTED TO BE USED IN ADJUSTING RINGS. 5. WEAR COURSE SHALL USE STEEL ADJUSTING RING INSERTS PER MANUFACTURES SPECS. WITH ENGINEERS APPROVAL CITYUF MANHOLE CASTING AND CBaKHASSEN ADJUSTING DETAIL REVISED:1-2o E_hIGINEERING DEPARTMENT SLATE NGI 2110 PIE NAME: G:\ENG\SPECS\2110 FUTURE STREET EXTENSION AREA. 2 TEMPOARY BARRICADES AT THE IHE CUL-DE-SAC. O FULL. DEPTH SWEET CONSTRUCTION AREA, I t A tEMPORARY GFN;-T-..SAC AREA. /I Pp G IN CAD TEMPORARY BITUMINOUS PAVING. / 4' RICH TEMPORARY BITUMINOUS CURB. TYPICAL CURB & GUTTER R NOT To "AL 3" BITUMINOUS BASE 2360 Tt, r6' CL. 5 AGGREGATE BASE 4" TEMPORARY BITUMINOUS cues, HAND OR MACHINE FORMED NOTES: EXTEND FUTURE SFWER/WATER IGNES 10' BEYOND THE TEW, BIT. CUL-AE-SAC- A HYDRANT & GATE VAU'F SHALL BE LOCATED 10' RIYONT) THE T MP CUT-DF-SAC, till t OF TYPICAL TEMP, CUL-DE-SAC R£wsED: 1-20 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PtmE Na.: FILE NAME:cr.AENc\cs`.szca 52O513 i 1/2' LETTERS RAISED FLUSH FONT "BIRCH" 2' LETTERS RAISED FLUSH T-SEAL/DONC€XtED PICKHDt.E DETAIL GASKETED LOS USED FOR SANITARY AND WATER MANHOLES CONCEALED PICKHOLE PER NF 1015 CUSTOM LOGO COMPONENT NUMBERS: AISED FLUSH ALL FRAMES ARE 1642 CONCEALED £HANHASSEN LOCO NUMBERPER E AN 5631 - SANITARY MANHOLES PER Nf 1015 NF Still) - STORM MANHOLES 5646 -WATER MANHOLES PLEnERS OLTS IN.s NOT REdPRED UNLESS CALLED OUT IN SPECIAL CONDITIONS. 1 3j6' 2. DIMENSIONS ARE IN ENGLISH MEASUREMENTS 3. CASINGS MEET HS-25 REOIUIREMENTS 2if4" 4. MANUFACNRED IN USA 5. OUAUFIE3 FOR LEEO CREDITS TE'RIAL 6 LD-CAST GRAY IRON, ASTM A-46 CLASS 3% RAISED FLUSH COVXEALED PIC ME DETAIL T FRAME -CAST GRAY IRON. ASTM-A-49 CLASS 40A 6. nNN19H-BARE METAL NO PAINT OR COATINGS. OCMSEN MANHOLE CASTINGS AND LIDS DETAIL REVISED: 12-19 PULrE Ba. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2111 FILE NAME: G. NG SPECS 2711 IT GYM FRaM P/L NO CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 'SlyMAX LRRVEWAY WTH IMSDE PROPEW HfRDOCCE.R Allows r1R_ 2i. MAX NOTH AT Raw- il'D.w p,wFOw-CR.Hanfn J_ _ __ ^T- sow wSCALLED OVER iiL -mc£ OF . £%. PAVEMENT !B` SAwNY tAiE ENtl aF mpsTwAY SAWCUT ALL SMUT PRIM AREAS AND MRS, TAM BEHORE PA191G IC be &AINMMI4 s@6Ei9 NtAC1IXt sent eA%UN6ti r Aue Att ma Ir 2 �YSir tr Si 7 SECAM Min MUM PA MT W WttN M3KM SMUT "You RAr3tAFSX OWKINYo Car Mum, or swtl RE A kRNW Or-P' 3$ r' TR9i { Owls; KdA9+wpAWS r er n>wWAY a am SA5r MNNA£NS* g A tr � TI p iM.t 3ERI :N AN q�£I . E aa4ER HQ eE IN .ALLF . T. A RADIUS M WSTA&LED A MVI Or 3 RMROS Is RECUMED, Io' GAR Fit P/L CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER d i. WMAX DRIVEWAY IILADE PROPERTY T HARMAR ALLOWS i 44 MRY wefli w RA.M4 RDW (+.D_w_ r 0 ar CURE, S p DNS% MSTAU2D DYER WATER S£RwCF' iron: (":".'f �fYEwAY 'fNt%FE55 W RRw. 3V1t 9f A M'.Nw4Rt W }-Y O'Te 6' g bill 8' p' AAES S loll 81R i J r W 1NE CVU 4F£os To K REM Act Tn_N T£ MOW VETxit FOR TROT R PUMMEV- 5H ff SAO .1M ME Mow, ells Ea MCSi" A ti S Ta tM _ next .kHt( ieyA.U4 K YESS INNr 5 lF Lille WLL R'IINN *O SA , m THIS G CFA.M NNE Y Rr ky0 wH 6a1R8 [Mi MAwIAIDS MWFIt LKAe'AatO1MAw flk'Ya1F. W R£ REST flAY Stiff. F WATER y{9 �* o w 7I AWO` PRSME T A CDSF AS MASS) W BY UUSAM A SMA MUM W AN r drums HPAME !LOUR as sda 9NMl DE NSt/d1FD. 6 A RAMOS S YlSTAUVI.. A MIN. OF Y RAMUS K Reavio D. CITYOF RESIDENTIAL BITUMINOUS *CHUM= DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES WITH AND WITHOUT CURBS REVISED: 12 19 PLATE ND., ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 5209 FILE NAMEtG G19P.]tiE52O9 'kl,,,..'. an " iTy p } P3�M1 d ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com a F- Z O � W 0 z F 0 Li.l Q n Q LU z Z I C) I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE r G 'M'^ V, r..l J Z LL Z 2 J rw� LLU H LL LV a o Oat this plan, eport was or under my and that I ed GINEER under State of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE WOMEN PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 219-0083 SHEET 2 of 12 CITY PROJECT NO. CITY OF CHANHASSEN SEWER, WATER OR COMUMATON SERVICE (CIRCLE ONE) House #__, Street Name —, PID � Lot-___ Block__-_ Plat/Addition Name________—___ _ SEWER: Downstream Manhole No. Sta. at P.L. from Downstream Manhole__+ Elevation at C.L. of Sewer Main -______ Distance from Sewer Main to Cleanout % of Grade for Service to be installed Length, Size and Type of Service Pipe ___________---_______ Depth at P.L. (Finish Surface to Invert) ___--- Main to Riser Horizontal Distance Riser Vertical Height__ Downstream Manhole No._____ Sta. at P.L. from Downstream Manhole + Length, Size and Type of Service Pipe ___ __ Depth at P.L. (Finish Surface to Curb Stop block) E- Denotes Sewer Service End ®-Denotes Water Service End (SHOW SKETCH WITH TIES HERE) contractor Foreman Tied by Date Location and Depth of Service certified by SeSerrAcce ties shall be swing ties of not more than 100' in length between Ile points and shall be tied to permanent structures such as budding comers, value boxes, manholes, catch basin& hydrants, etc. Ties to bees, power poles, telephone or utility boxes 'wm not be accepted. Itstructuret Le t ilbl within property corners' too on, at CITYOF STANDARD SERVICE CHAIN TIE CARD REVISED: 11-19 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLATE ND.: 5221 FILE NAME:G:\ENG\sPEcs\5z21 A' 1 r-12 AMG Cu" troar Riot of way Rna .r e(leel-Wue dnY) jC`'{fliDt �w t mwln i t rrael,er, 1 case lerel born t Den-vv, toae�,edn" ma m-nouns ells occeav box located on ( lotertl lu0 the north ar mxt side of cnecte, m tint water sewriia Le Mar ___ 1.a btax woaae � aebaw, I S.0' Yr. I Tapea waste file i ( Water Service-Planview L o oA�if awfe Fidebvd ¢nee -\ CVMtM levo wo.pr b- lace elm bar t the north owtt or erne or me 0 o amat te, swHra. 12 AWC CµwY am.tew-dw r trace wbw (T4P) 12 AWG bolster clad aM--Mil to they edmaw gone, awe rod. Notes: 1 1 Lwwk9 Mwm aw.Y ewM an. allow, M I ddntn cat. fast be ketweed MM.fWy I .d).bot to the ondce pipe. The wbe Mdl be foetmed to Me piping withgwtk wore amtlwan .1b ' dri wings-lum. tww or water Areal tope of 50' ht.11- woter service who eramdn9 o wee reC .x .Pt worm Mora pninge then the conneate to maF um'woMS Is'.W. nw wrchq (aw 2.Leavo 2coil of dtra rml and blue wb'mg Awn Naw show) le er hoe Red we N bean paa,dd,g .wooand blue eke fie the wave wi Ica Ih. morn pro. trwt connects to the mda - gne ono" SBo net a1ow, win . wrbete, to offlue rw odpotme,ts to be madr without dhMwyh9.1.s Water Service -Section View 4.The Cmnealim. Most be prod. will, the oouge �awLoading Not to aMs cC neettn, orowm w WATER SERVICE �� 4ilMlidl TRACER WIRE DETAIL REVISED''-1T PLATE N0. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 5504 PNGILE NAME, SPEC5 5504 MNDoi GEOTE (TYPE NOTC SUB - PIPE 4 a . s t ill W1 I' d aWIN Id -end Pjaraw BOTTOM OF PVC DRAINTILE PERFORATED -- --�-- --WITHOUT SOCK t t.: s aPL ).E. TAIL 6" CDNC. OLLAR NOTE5: RO ND 1. CLEANOUTS REQUIRED AT 2W MAXIMUM PIPE INTERVALS & All. ENDING POINTS, 2. SWING TIES TO BE SHOWN ON AS -GUILTS 77 FOR ALL CLEANOUTS AND ENDING POINTS TO ALL DRAIN TILES. 3, OPENINGS IN STRUCTURE FOR DRAINTILE TO _r BE FABRICATED OR CORE DRILLED. :• 4. THIS DETAIL TO BE USED WHEN V OR MORE ...... ..:.... OF EXISTING SOa. SUB CUT IS NECESSARY /f/ r-SI.;?F TO O+J 71.FT 5. ALL. DRAINTILE TO HAVETRACER 1'RRES, CUM 4" SUB —SURFACE DRAINTILE PF -D: 1-20 `)EPARTMFNT PLATE NO.: 5232 A!AME:G: ENG :<_h7:CS'523? Sao. serelee (TIP) Trove "it.on Meth api sir smn p --- 1, 4 Way ManhoM Son. eeMce (TIP) Tracer We a>M piping y oesnatpe with ymper wire uSan. Servke (Tre) pa L San. seen ice TMww w.e (Daloil 05502) '. MNa-Re leted lug /-cmnewhe (Tre) � San, service Um') Awe copper teled-vrem (Tm) NOTES f. wbee shown away from ppe far di wbe Dram -in msgesium shell be Installed w the bottom side ar Me ,is, below the prlegline. The be eadl be grounding auode (TIP) bestowed to the pipe with tape or pWrtis ties at 5' interest. 2. The bersectlowS must be Mew, with the gauge opprapdote Copperhead Snakebite Lotlrkg Coble alwe ar app'Mwl eaudl. TRACE WIRE PLAN (SEWER) Not to scale Uff OF SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM CBANH I3 I TRACER WIRE DETAIL REvISED:9-19 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLATE No.: 5506 FILE NAMEtG: G SPECS 5= 8,-0" 2'-0" 4'-0" 2'-0" 1/2"x6" Galvanized Bolts with Cut Washers (Carriage, Hex. or Sq.) 7-1/2'-1 r i" V-3 V-3 No 81x8 O" MIN e Grade Lumber EEx. Ground m APPROX. N Treated Wood Posts 4"x4" x 8'-0" No. 2 Grade Lumber or better The barricade board face surfaces shall be fully reflectorized in alternate silver -white and red striping, using a reflective sheeting conforming to the requirements of Mri Spec. 3352.2A2a, Standard No. 1. Prior to installing the reflective sheeting, the barricade boards shall be given a complete coating of White Wood Primer point conforming to MnDot spec 3513, followed by a second coot of white point conforming to MnDot spec. 3531 applied only to the surfaces not covered with reflective sheeting. The barricade boards shall be completely pointed and reflectorized sheeting applied before being installed on the posts. The barricade shall be placed 10'-0" from end of bituminous road, barricades to be centered on the roadway, to be facing traffic flow. Barricades to be installed in accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Trofic Control Devices. CITY OF TYPICAL BARRICADE REVISED: 1-10 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PATE No. 5244 FILE NAME: G:\ENG\5PEC5\5244 /-12 AWG Coppew N bacw / aadwitaea) green Right of way lie Oriw-n Negenown Mainline to gfO1'edn9 °node red falscarve tug cwm«tor - ----------------------'" sense. eye ( Sew. soot Taps or pisethe eh Sewer Ses_ review Nat a e SanRwy $ewer i yfilMae wain �arady NN M-grre .mce b w . be. eatee en iMw w ref sine seer ue IN. 1 wH w. AWG Cooper a reted wa .b. t /� t2 AWa (:appw wed rtvewe to to too y vaundsw snore. rm. le Notes: 1 1'Mr{,Q Mom ham Me °piny la 1 M. Ma M betanad 0 ,MM,be tdY sips. A.eel Tm Ir ill be 'e ow. The w4r Mon be lwene, ee the s st nrtb use water proof tope a! Mm tanf6waf d robes 4aj,eetlm, ywd wrMce and r arlaex a 50' ewww caber eo' to mofi bep,�lp rod ew Ur Me maeFnWn yxfi9 fie l0'. weI. V. one elrwe {see f 2Lr.. V ml of ew M wd wee use W wow abae.7 thing be occer boo Rod wire b awn Qouedis arcade end bw, wxe N to. Ireca ebe few ore a#Hoe pips tint --to to the mate Ike wire" 3b. rvd dutch .1. to Ins/deeeout to aloe fe, adpste wnts to be made wimwt derogkg wGev $al1)tarV $erYlae-$eCtlafl yICW 4.1M wwwwthse must be maw, with the bw weeteeom °apwrwa Not to scald Ina lne, coowe wee. ffffOF SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE TRACER WIRE DETAIL REVISED: 9-19 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT T777 5507 FlLE NAME: G. ENG SPECS 5507 Where the flow of water is sheeting, place sod strips perpendicular to the direction of water flow. SHINGLING SOD c Where the flow of water is concentrated, place sod stips parallel to the direction of OVERLAPPING SOD water flow. NOTE: Although pegging on sod is not specifically required it is understood that the contractor will be responsible for the successful establishment of the sod including repair or replacement of sod which becomes displaced or damaged due to lack of protection or proper care. CM OF SOD OMEN PLACEMENT REVISED: 1-10 PLATE NO.: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 5303 FILE NAME: G:\ENG\SPECS\5303 N Not to Scale 1' Spacing — Tape or Plastic Ties (TYP)— Finished R�SI&INIVAlf"i Manholes not in streets shag have tracer wire box installed next to Manhole and wires will be brought into the tracer box. Wire continues with Magnesium grounding anode rod and connectsto main line wiring. (see section view above) Tape or --- f stic Ties (TYR) —\ .� E PLAN VIEW -Bring tracer wire into manhole at manhole ring interface, coil enough wire to extend 12" above finished grade and anchor below i$I barrier. 12 AWG Copper clod steel -red. Factory connected to the grounding anode rod. Tape or Plastic Ties (TYR) 5' Max. Spacing Drive-in Magnesium grounding anode rod Drive-in magesium grounding anode (TYP) —Tape or Plastic Ties (TYR) CITY OF SANITARY MANHOLE CIBANHASSEIi TRACER WIRE DETAIL RFwseo: 1-20 FNGINFERING DFPARTMFNT PLATE No.: 5508 FILE NAME G: ENG SPECS 5598 U' PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION -A 54 LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION DEVELOPER- NAME PHONE NUMBER CONTACT- NAME PHONE NUMBER PERMITTED CONSTRUCTION HOURS-MON.-FRI. 7AM-6PM SATURDAY 9AM-5PM ABSOLUTELY!!! NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, MAINTENANCE OR DELIVERIES ALLOWED ON SITE OUTSIDE OF THESE HOURS. CITY OF CHANHASSEN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 952-227-1160 NOTES: 1. SIGN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF TWO POSTS. 2. INSTALL SIGNS AT ALL CONSTRUC11ON ENTRANCES. 3, SIGN SHALL HAVE WHITE BACKGROUND WITH BLACK LETTERING. 4, LETTER SIZE TO FIT 8' X 6' SIGN. Of DEVELOPMENT C 1� INFO SIGN REVISEDa-10 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PlA7E NO.: 5313 111- FlLE NAME:G:\ENG\SPECS\5313 00 Dyk ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com I— O Olesse oC cz G 0 W Z N J Q a H W z W Q a o Z I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 219-0083 SHEET 3 of 12 63RD S88026135" E 399.89 009.38 1009.69X X '009.62 9.52 X1009.50 1009. B XIOV� 009.45 O XI009.J2 / ko T� '�_X,009.25 ItQ X 1009.56 � X-Ib 1 X�o9 � XIOnS15 " <. N 1009.28 X100 1 0. CV) X 1009.52 009,47 \ PC1009.20 O 007. _-_X_X�.- �- IOU LEGEND FOUND IRON MONUMENT O SET IRON PIPE RLS 44110 HYDRANT CURB STOP O WATER MANHOLE QS SANITARY MANHOLE FLARED END SECTION ®y ELECTRIC BOX LIGHT Q STORM MANHOLE WELL 4 POWER POLE TELEPHONE BOX CABLE BOX TRANSFORMER (A) RECORD PLAN xe¢o MEASURED 007 63 %- X--jam- %i--i(1007.68 100 .68 GASMAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE X FENCE - - - - - - - EDGE WETLAND FROM MINNESOTA NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY DELINEATED WETLAND BY ALLIANT 11/13/19 LIDAR CONTOUR BOUNDARY 0 BRICK PAVERS 1015.23 `'IOI8.24 1009.30 1009.35 4 1015.00+ 1017.68 m 0 1034.01 34.94 103625 1037.37 1037.68 1038:05 1038.85 1038.49 1 I X1033.77 X103485 X1036.14 .X I STRE ET 5 (88o26I�`-709.00 03916 0 03456 1035.6106.80 1. X 1039.53 I 038.74 e 1039 23 X _i XIOJ9PF XIO36J4 X. 1035.42 X a 0 m @X 4 XI041.18 1036.48 '�' n XI036.a 58 w o '042.38X `�+ X � X X C �n Q X 1037.68 .F g 1042.26 - U X1043.33 X U LO 1035.84 X� n°j oX 1036.2 W �. < U N 0 . LO - X.1043.80 V XEq to 1034 96 M o - 10 8,38 N 1042.20 - 07 - ' 0 103X8.3 '. 0 X1047.91 c M E5 O X L Dry X qq90, �.. m M 4 o 1044.75 T X 1034.30 4 8 O XID44.D0 16 102329� _ X :(1049.91 X1048.93 1045.62 X1034.7.4 X X1045.38X1044.58 1022 85 1 X1031.88 XI050.4� )021.03 1022.27 N X1030.23 X1033.43 X v y --- - Flo ---- X102&B4 a - )22.06 IV88�Z6�3SIW ZOO ( Xf031.85 'a v - a 0 yy - %-X 7F:r--� _ IC24.25X 1025.94 1030.33 1035.29 _ �X X1osl.oz 1^ 6.5a ^ -:050,20 105110 1045.93 i X1044.03 X'.o37. 93 X1039.5a X 1045.73 XI04 L28 1036.26 -- 102775 1026.65 X1035.28 1 XI040.92 �40� '.� 105135 Gj 1047.34� `O o x h 1044.21 1029.08 102526 W E <`o �I- X1043.08 X1040.49 Xn 29 81 XI032:45 Xo 1267 024.98 101050.22y 07 1050.25 XI028.26 436{a05078 1045.98 XI031.84X1037.e4 1045,58X 0`lot.16X102798 X _..09 1050.8IX1049.XK)24.11 033.17 1041.98 s o X50S0.04 ,. X1033.74 `! a i°-X1039.73 X1039.13x g ,y 97 XIO4,3 56 XI046.84 I X1039.I3 1045.42 1 attf`' X1035.74 X1041042.85 XI025.42 X I030.30 1040.32 I o 8.79 1042.14 �✓- 1035.47 X 1047.26 1049.52 " _ 1yy043.17 X <1046.14 X1048.64 X X1023.18 x X1038.$6 x '� \ 1045.72 1046.33 11043.20, X X1033.97 1041.51 1044.24 1056. 98 X1031.70 1037.25 X _ - X1027.64 X1o3s.71 ID42.85 /1Q45.78 X '0 X1022.35 ( 1048.60 XI037.67 x X 1040.62 x 1 it 1042.93X I 104L56 X1035.57 y is XI044.67 _ XI028.28 1038.58 1043.91'1 _ x I )045.90 X1047.64 X1036.66 GRASS XI040.88 - '- XI022.60 X1032.93 x IO4I.,2 045.50 11. 1045.35 X x 1042.45 ,{� I .82 4 1045.33 --, .y100336 i6 X H.jc� X X -X-��x I 1041.uI X/ >- X 103J.26 111III1043.56 1047.17 1047.75 `�_CHAI'J LINK-7r _X X1028.11 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY 1036 72 x ` -EASEMENT PER PLAT XI022.44 103906 _ FENCE -/. OFLENVILLA ESTATES �-1031.00 X �1043.58 _ LEGAL- - • Lot 3, Block 1, Lenvilla Estates, Carver County, Minnesota. Abstract Property • 1. This survey and the property description shown herein are based upon information found in the Pro Forma commitment for title insurance prepared by Watermark Title Agency, as issuing agent for Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, Commitment no. 66334, dated January 20, 2020. 2. The locations of underground utilities are depicted based on information from Gopher State One Call system for a "Boundary Survey locate". The information was provided by a combination of available maps, proposed plans or city records and field locations which may not be exact. Verify all utilities critical to construction or design. 3. The orientation of this bearing system is based on the Carver County Coordinate System NAD83 (86 Adj.). 4. All distances are in feet. 5. The area of the above described property is 278,909 square feet or 6.403 acres 6. Bench Mark 1: MnDOT monument 2706 D, in Excelsior, 0.6 mile east along Trunk Highway 7 from the junction of Trunk Highway 41 and Trunk Highway 7, at Trunk Highway 7 milepoint 182.6, 87.0 feet northwest of a power pole, 60.0 feet south of eastbound Trunk Highway 7, 51.0 feet northwest of Galpin Lake Road, 1.0 foot north of a witness post, having an elevation of 952.31 feet NGVD29. 7. Bench Mark 2: Top nut of hydrant located on the south side of Wood Duck Lane, southwest of the cul-de-sac has an elevation of 1034.51 feet NGVD29. 1021.76 N88°26-35°W 299.77 X yam. .� __ g^ X--Xo X 102L93 1024.54 lozz67 022.08 x _ I _ 1022.85 X1023.13 X1021.27 x 1020.61X -X x / XI020.47 X1022.03cli _ Q x v al 1020.75 W 1020.33 1020.96 X j N U�XI020.65 0 A 020.80 fl X Z 1020.49 �1021.00 _ x 1020.46 _ 1021. 10 1021.16 rv0o G0i70 YY fuuu.UO ••....... I X1046.77;1'1044.06 1 1047.24X X1039. 15 1026.04 1025.56 X1032 78 X5.90 1043.73 _ 1034.69 1034.23 X 1035.89 _ X X1046.50 1035.37 X X1032.43 X1027.56 1025.29 X X X1041.24 1046.23 X X1027.07 X1025.69 1046.70X X1034.45 1025.65 - I 1034 96 X X1030.24 `,103465 X1034.07 X1028.36 X\1026.90 O26'\0 1044.46 X. I X 1032.83 1028.96 X `(1033.92 1034.28X 1033.99 X X\026g6 /j(1026.16 104035X X104L39 X1033.04 X1033.63 1036.45 X fXl N ti6X 1033.11 ,5.y �D~' 6 42 zx a x3ti' XI033.05 10�� O X / ^ � 1030.85 OV \ O is' 1024.56 XX 102432 0 20 40 80 1 V SCALE IN FEET n n y 1024.55 - 1024.88 MOST WESTERLY NORTHWEST / CORNER OF LOT 3 i -------DRAINAGE AND---�� UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 435105 --WESTERLY WEST LINE OF LOT 3 I 63RD S88026'35"E 399.89 ' STREET S88026'35"E 100.00_, \ NORTH LINE-- — �_ / OF LOT 3 __ \ NORTHWEST —CORNER OF LOT 1 -t?LS a6535 1/2" OPEN -RLS.. 46535 1 6 I ib j DRAINAGE AND UTILITY--l' EASEMENT PER PLAT OF LENVILLA ESTATES I j 7 / \ / / / / / / I I I l \ \ \ I ^ o I o0 N I n M LO O 01) \-' I 2 RLS 24992-� -. tl , -Ii W SOUTHWEST-� CORNER OF LOT 1 SOUTH LINE-- I DRAINAGE AND OF LOT I I -DRAINAGE AND UTILITY 6 _._. UTILITY EASEMENT - - - - - - - -- ---� EASEMENT PER PLAT _ N8802635"W 299,77 PER DOC. 435105 NQ. OF LENVILLA ESTATES j ;o - 1 6 / I I DRAINAGE AND UTILITY-� W ' I j j1 I EASEMENT PER PLAT OF LENVILLA ESTATES I I I I I I I DRAINAGE AND N89'12'39"E 59.31' \\ UTILITY EASEMENT / OZE 56• o� I I I N�321 III��� / / 0* DRAINAGE AND UTILITY-'-� o O_ - _ L r0 EASEMENT PER PLAT N - OF LENVILLA ESTATES O - // DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LLt OVER ALL OF OUTLOT A � N; o OUTLOT As _ BLOCK 1 II .'to w N88.46'34"W_ _ SOUTH LINE --DRAINAGE AND ---------a I I I N 19.42' ,-OF LOT 3 j // UTILITY TI I Y EASEMENT 435105 I I 1 437.00 I / DRAINAGE AND UTILITY I M _ _ I / --- EASEMENT PER PLAT I I J N I -OF LENVILLA ESTATES I I — _ 15.58' 25.1�_ L=96.1S R=650.00' �\ 1 --EASEMENT AND UTILITY --- --- � � 6r45 D1' W EASEMENT PER PLAT �-6.26 25 0 700.62 .\ _. _._— — — — — — — — — — — - L -- �� =465?5 I 6,I 6 - __— — — $ OF LENVILLA ESTATES _ — ...._ J / i\ C _... - - - - _ /L= 1.69.0 p2.59° j n 40 n T ' s4.6�' f 4 5 f I ti� N8802635"W 1000.00 l 6 f � f I . LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE R.O. W EASEMENT LINE • FOUND IRON MONUMENT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: II 6 --I o �6 0 � �-1_ I NOT TO SCALE I Being 6 feet in width and adjoining lot lines and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines, unless otherwise indicated on the plat. PARCEL AREA TABLE PARCEL AREA SF AREA AC B1-L1 221,390 5.08 B1-L2 36,196 0.83 OUTLOT A 15,951 0.37 ROW 5,371 0.12 TOTAL 278,909 6.40 234.51 --- -- - ; TAKOMA AIL Im I ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com O r LU Z I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 219-0083 5 SHEET 5 of 12 ASSUMED REAR LOT LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 / 1 / I I I / I I I I I I I I I SITE PLAN DATA: GROSS AREA 6.403 ACRES WETLAND OUTLOT A 0.336 ACRES EXISTING DRAINAGE/UTILITY EASEMENT (LOT 1) 3.472 ACRES ROW DEDICATION 0.123 ACRES NET DEVELOPABLE AREA 2.472 ACRES PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS 2 NET DENSITY 0.81 UNITS/NET ACRE EXISTING LAND USE RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY PROPOSED LAND USE RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY EXISTING ZONING RSF - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING RSF - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT RSF ZONING STANDARDS: REQUIRED MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK REQUIRED MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT RIGHT OF WAY MINIMUM LOT AREA 90 FT (CUL-DE-SAC LOTS) 90 FT (STANDARD LOTS) 15,000 SF 63RD LOT DATA TABLE 65' x 65' MINIMUM PAD BLOCK LOT AREA (SF) SETBACKS FRONT REAR 1 1 221,390 3LI 30 1 2 36,196 30 1 30 * SIDE SETBACKS, SEE TYPICAL LOT DETAIL �•. ' 2 ii i { 4 ��/ EXISTING HOME AND DRIVEWAY TO �i I I o _ REMAIN WITH 'DRIVEWAY AND UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO 63RD ST W 1 j` -7 ,..`.. - ... - - I ,- y ... i I SAMPLE HOUSE PAD 65' DELINEATED WETLAND BLOCK 1 154/24' OUTLOT A i I I I ROW DEDICATION I I o— J LA -- 7 o L T 35'R TEMP CUL-DE-SAC - SEE CITY PLATE 52058' �-- (DESIGN MODIFIED - - TO BE OFFSET) ��S• ° _ FUTURE ROAD C/L ALINGMENT %\ REMOVE EXISTING R20' PAVEMENT AS REQUIRED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION INSTALL; TEMPORARY BARRICADES SURMOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER / J G � c. ,x J OO�x EASEMENT LEGEND: a o. 6r II ------------ 0: FRONT SETBACK LINE 6 � F — FULL BASEMENT L — LOOKOUT • I W — WALKOUT I W 1 Iw IZ wl ZI 7 J I� DENOTES PAD AREA 1N NI to I oI Io I o1 SAMPLE FOOTPRINT I I I I I I LDENOTES 30' REAR SETBACK LINE I TYPICAL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY 61 16 EASEMENTS UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN L _ _ _ _ _ _ — — — — — J ON THE PLAN. TYPICAL LOT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE — — - EASEMENT LINE BUILDING SETBACK PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE — — ROW EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY EXISTING FIBER OPTIC - EXISTING GAS ----- - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER — — — — WETLAND SETBACK ---------------+ I,.'••. -,•••,•-',','. •-I WETLAND BUFFER El WETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT WETLAND CITY CLASS. MCWD CLASS. AREA 1 MANAGE 2 MANAGE 2 19,799 SF (0.455 AC) WETLAND BUFFER CALCULATION ASSUMED BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS: THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT HAVE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS PER WETLAND CLASSIFICATION. THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS WITH THE MOST STRICT GUIDELINE FOLLOWED: Local Govenunental Uiiit City of Chanhassen Minnelialia Creek Watershed District Weiland Classification Buffer Strip RequrcemOtt Priuc�al Structii e Set hack to Buffer AccessorySuaictize Setback to Bider 1Vedannd Classification Average Base Buffer Width Required (20%+Avg Slope) Min. Average Base Buffer Width Required (10%Avg Slope) MANAGE 2 20 30 1 15 1b1ANAGE 2 30* 24** *Minaehaha Creek Watershed District allows a 2' base buffer widdi reduction for every 5% decrease In average buffer slope from 20%. * *Proposed buffer averages 1090 or less throughout this the niut. buffer can be reduced to 24'. (30 - 2' * 2 = 24') ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com r F- O IL z N LLI O Z z P 0 w Q in Q CZ G a W z J W W z G a cn I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 219-0083 r� U SHEET 6 of 12 r N ; �r \ N _ STREET R' KIT f—_ 0 20 40 80 t / i - _ _-'-----_---- - -1020 y __ _ - _ SCALE IN FEET J ! j ' d f / .1_ .. PArh d"'L AND -=-.._.....__ _ _.._ -..- .._.._ -.._ ._ .... __ - ._ __ _._ .- _._ __ �1 �" .i �\ # J i 1r1.- ,°` -. .. _ ..' "'...^.,-s, - ASLACN - - - _.._ _ / : _...._ -_ -. _... _.... _ _w ` -f rI r a v v '? .r'� ! f I /"� .,' \ �`" 1AT0� � __-� 'i , E � \ - i t !'�' � k � / P t o ' •-'� r .__ ,., l f / VF - - J / I / 1 / J l / -"� �,, 0\ / ��� \�\ 1 t r' t V L^• - � I t 1 !} `� ({ :, i // tI %� l � 1 i J l f� .- I If 14` rol L Pi D JI c, / o I If\ 1 J A j[} 1 1 L I\ I } -- .._.,_...f� _ PP ,, ..._ .._ ^•..� ._. _ '`� ��c r :c l/ dL7ULOT ,E_' a E" � z if�o�•� y � 4 I l t + r' 8 ' �%'� /, • •L I (,f i / i \ \ \ t / I/ s f �r. / �J I a ss I 1 I 1 f f chi 5y o a'\ - 33. a, ,/ i, I r,F2 nits ,� ✓ '.� / i / ,f s V . 7� _ t ?�-- 1 � f r ,_ . S .. Qf LCi 1 # t---, a, :r, L i -4 y AF, Iv ;t; t l_. _/ t •= µ _ I / t �, ) } / HA A ,: t # # \ P R e. �� ,s^ i - j •'1 j Fv / t �If ir,=. I �` - 1' � l )'-EAj ����s( j%��• d ,�/ I # j i # j x # / \ ':. # } ? i / \\ 4 I 4 I i ! ? j •,/ f r ! / r.. : 1 / 7 l/ 7rr-777 '�.' __ _.I } ! I i Y ...%' f--! I f - '` .s^ `�-r•�....'"..._ �1C3� `=_ __ ' -- N d' y, a 3.1:' �y.. i I 1 1i # n / 11 c; r cv: v f c cF x r , { i, ._;/ J / j�/ 1G i T I # o o / I _ t / 1 0 7 a / t P f a iy 1 if DE j� j lll_d- �i - i I ; 1 \t i dj / 1 i 7- — �' t t' i ! Ji /1 ( le,l._ // fi`� ! f y / i / r -7,• � .'. -'.' ._ - - -- — I r tl 1 tir,4 ;i i I fl PP df t II /! d ' t ! ��,�� /lift ,..-„'" I � I I � ( ,' t I f � %i - _-. � - -- -- - - I� /• t/ � t > > � I r ,-. � � � I i i i I � I t- / • .�, - t ` 1 '.- EOF t1020.4 1036 �/ - DELINEATED ° v v / i 00 1027 r t r t 11i It r, \\ A /'` I \V / E # t1 I I h 1 I ! f 1 II !i ) `. F 1 . o WETLAND / H . � P 35 5' J ( f I I/ i t/ # f i# 4 I#+/ I _ , Y , 1 i ,x, t \ t ,I ;,1; �, ;' I P R 1, �` ,� % OUTL N. -.u0:i 11 f7 {u%' 1 �r cK1,AV r/ f ti--rt:JI �y-. �.. _... '� i ( # II # I 1 i i ! l I �' P ! V i�a i1 p� ,q K OT A / f ..0 !I# �, I / O A r!t ! �' Do - �% _ �1 v I' 1 _ -✓ I # o EXISTING WETLAND I r�fl tiE(r'l L .�`` i-# # I \ - C>� '#• p p O ,., / _„ nwa ., # ! t I i c OVERLAND OUTLET Folmr 1 �Si3yr;, 4J i'""` D -"( �- ( r 1036 I� s: i \ L f_ U IW DA,eu€NT DO', NO, :.55195 � 1 - -\ fiCP. r' ! I p.. # I i .rti-.. _ — —T-.-+ a PATFT tyni fF.i, rlaK--,'..-.0-- - - y/..-,..-iy,7 7 -- f — - - . -1-1 L - - - �N - - __ .T o TtFE c^Uhi ref.\' '••,. .-„,c ry—%�C __-. _......__- -.— __ ...- - % --J _..-_ ti g \ ,+,,.-... tjS+DD i }0 6+ -_I kr )E l r , O , ..i / ' ✓ / ....1 __ -- uN GRADE TO 2:1 0� 03a - d MAX. SLOPEtx O \ `' 'il i l \ ✓ , i ° \ / 6 I r 10 �, r r J f , i \ \ \ , . � J J � o. 33 1 C t \ F;, �C•. ( `_, \ \ / ,r, ,..- ��y. \ �,-� 1 i I.� �� / // / ! 1\� � i > /IJ� � 10 -i;a5 J ' I / J t...__ / r. L % I -' � �i,\ r I / / r� _ � � ~x s 1032.94T 033. \ / fa \ ' i ? ft I/f /j / ` LL \ .. J t , CAUTION: I f !' v I L d / / �L " 1032.71 03 EXISTING PRIVATE J / z ' l /�\ t� `/ J eXYI ! / t% L _ oo & PUBLIC UTILITIES ` 2.71 , 1 % Lr i r / 1, \ i _ 2/ 4e 03tsblC r % \ / r / \ \ /: 2 \l \\ \ !'2. 03 1033.02ex TC 0,32.7Sex a- ......-__ '� �V \ �``_... .._ r'f ;� P �f ,r' �,\ L\ A• \V\L �A��� -BM ill _ r GRADING NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY ALL OF THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 2. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM PROPOSED BUILDINGS AT MINIMUM GRADE OF 2.0%. ALL SWALES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2.00%. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE ADJACENT ROADWAYS FREE OF DEBRIS AND PREVENT THE OFF -SITE TRACKING OF SOIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND WATERSHED. 4. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, AT (800) 252-1166, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. ALL IMPROVEMENTS TO CONFORM WITH CITY OF CHANHASSEN CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS SPECIFICATION, LATEST EDITION. 6. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION ACCESS POINTS. 7. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR SOIL CORRECTION REQUIREMENTS AND TESTING REQUIREMENTS. 8. STRIP TOPSOIL IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. REUSE STOCKPILE ON SITE. STOCKPILE PERIMETERS MUST BE PROTECTED WITH SILT FENCE. 9. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING GRADING OF (3:1 OR GREATER) SIDE SLOPES AND DRAINAGE SWALES, WOOD FIBER BLANKET OR OTHER APPROVED SOIL STABILIZING METHOD (APPROVED BY ENGINEER) SHALL BE APPLIED OVER APPROVED SEED MIXTURE AND A MINIMUM OF 4" TOPSOIL. 10. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST DISCUSS DEWATERING PLANS WITH ALL SUBCONTRACTORS TO VERIFY REQUIREMENTS. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHOULD CONSULT WITH EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR AND ENGINEER TO DETERMINE APPROPRIATE METHOD. DEVELOPER/BUILDER: nT-1, PAD WIDTH = 65' 2.0% MIN. 65' 25 FINISH GRADE o ,n TOPSOIL GRADING GRADE SUBGRA ;n 0.0% AEN LOOR WALKOUT PAD GRADING LEGEND: FR ggg,3 GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION HOUSE TYPE LOWESr FLOOR ELEVATION 950.3 957. REAR OF PAD REAR ELEVATION o - EXISTING CONTOUR - SETBACK m 789 PROPOSED CONTOUR 15' VARIES X62.44 9y,�pa PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ADRIE -FINISH GRADE * / �2.00% DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE _ 20% W WALK OUT - - - - EASEMENT LINE \� `GRADING GRADE PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE LOT LINE - - RIGHT-OF-WAY y EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ROUTING HOLD DOWN DETAIL SINGLE FAMILY HOME NOT TO SCALE ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-ine.com Q H O z N W o z w a N V) Q � a z C) I hereby certify specification, or prepared by me direct supervisior am a duly Licen PROFESSIONAL El, the laws of the MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE rQ r m z V/ F_ a LILI IL a J z a — Z Q LL � 0 a a Z Z W Q IL hat this plan, report was or under my and that 1 sed GINEER under State of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 219-0083 11 SHEET 7 Of 12 a STRE Try --_ - �♦ _ ~1, r, d i � r� { r _ ! 1 24- -1022- 0, J25r /50 ' ,, �' 100 r _ T 4 . i01 I t i ( I / ( ! SCALE- IN FEET - - ! f d /_ •. + f f ✓ \ 1f r'r' / t ✓ I {t ! / \ r 10i0'=. / ^^' `' ", / I ,r -^- / 1 / i d f t ^= '• „•, / iti/t, e_ y av a \ 1 ! i \ + ^ l t ! \ J ! t p / t; ✓ / If // l f / ram_-�` \V \� \ �' �1 ! \\ t� i I %�ipt! // f I E Z \ t/ �// IJ jj 1\� w✓0 Ifl t t /1 // t/ J , •- '- -..- .,,_ .__ .w- / / i / , t i r / 0 ,,• - 3J0T\ ` _ / p- _". _- •.. �\ . o^ _..- ..+ `' - . < 1 t h .,, i I , .r°` ®/ if/iJ// It !/ /1 "`•..,.,,,,J� --- �`�.Q� ��{ I 3 it-..,, I A\ l j ': ����/ r 1 ; I`til \\ 4 ! I ft/ / ,r Jf� jJ. f f r A � � -i t { �i f / • ^°,,,,,, o .,. '" � '`• I i i ) !r -� ` J t { f � is P' r 'pq. ," v I � :.' i f f : I f , -'' '- / , / / - / / ,. i � / - !! ✓ \ � I I / t F ✓ I r f �t fr/ � ..- �' f '°f r .i 1 � „' I$+l' :; f % / _.: ' ..` �. ` } i • i - � 1-.. G...! % '` .✓ ! 1 !f l i f t of v` '� I. c' d- p nLS `7W % «7b '' "' s `'" `"^ "' .,,- `.. �/I .% y j \ ' '� t • 1 ) t t ! , J f ✓ � v V � � / .-_r _ ,r J P ' r� -�I � o / ;.o �, o r; r ./j .^ � ti, �.„_r � .i / _, fi '! r c�' / \ t7' !; ! F .r _ I i y! -` I i , i ; f 4 , V / I R E I � �t � 1 1 t i1 '✓!f�j� i + I h �, _ _ tio2 - >~ - _ _ -� \ ,, ti m C9IN v' r t7 GCS n'j' ,gin r� ( 7 o - .- c 1 C) o �w x / .? o ' �� �� ° ri t / f , t l t b j� C�^ 1 1 r o - // u I I I j 14<a o i l hI I i/ t/'`i� ✓ n! I I�i-i� ��/ 7 t i I d '' a I onoe S / I + E I j 1 it i t ! / f� ✓; i ; !...-_ xe_ r N If--- N7� , Y I 1 f � � 'PRE ' �' / p 1 ✓�/ ; i I `h 1 �` ; f ` ' I h �`j�� Q {\j Q I \ \I i! 4 1 i( t J J, `I o/ 2` I i 1 1 � \ ,. �jl. A / [ /I + f 110.36 1027 e v 1 I t , I I I ,` f, p rr I f r l j lx�� r, J ' a 'o e EiIE;;; t ; BLOCKI, Itll I t OUTLOT Ape . /`w. // r !t ll t 1 i f 3 I i + I E W n N �- ` J1 1 \ i' I d / -.� i^ ram-,/ �, i \ �\ �`:✓ __. rt ' i " - 361 W t.---.-. / 1 / / P /' ."..\- '/✓+�`--. <_`"^. 4.^rJ I .� ff t''j f j E I x i F G D- px a {( - ..._--....- v i I 4 _� \ t`..� f f-i-� 1- ,t -�- �E I------- -�I _ stf f t - _ - t c \ _ - - - TAKOMA TRAIL f �ii//6- , - � tl { s A J r v ;,`, - / v ✓f f/ / / /1 / t i \ \\ EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ! 1 \ 1 tf r / 3 \\ �'•�� \ `,Y'^ ` r q� _ 1 1. Lt ` , v \ � ✓ f, A'y "/ r 1 i `! j ('\r� j ! f 1 'S .\J. ti .-- A v f t � 1 DND ;. II - t NOTE - + INSTALLINLETPROTECTION ~ ON DOWNSTREAM INLETS ` ACTIVE SWPPP LEGEND / SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MULCH BERM FIBER ROLLS / MULCH SOCKS SILT FENCE TEMPORARY MULCH COVER TEMPORARY HYDROMULCH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ROCK DRIVEWAY / ROCK PADS INLET PROTECTION DEVICES PAVEMENT (DRIVEWAY/ROADS) SOD STOCKPILES NOTE: CONTRACTOR, GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR SWPPP INSPECTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE AS GRADING PROGRESSES SEDIMENT BARRIERS I. SILT FENCE (MnDOT 3886) 2. CURB LOG 3. ROCK WEEPER INLET PROTECTION DEVICES I. WIMCO (MnDOT TYPE A & C) 2. INFRASAFE STORM DRAIN/CULVERT 3. SILT SACK (MnDOT TYPE A) 4. DANDY BAG (MnDOT TYPE B) ANTI -TRACKING CONTROL I. 2" CRUSHED CLEAR ROCK (LAND DEVELOPMENT) TEMPORARY SEED MIX I. MnDOT-100 (OATS 20-120 DAY STABILIZATION) 2. MnDOT-150 (1-2 YEAR STABILIZATION) PERMANENT SEED MIX/STABILIZATION I. MnDOT 270 (RESIDENTIAL TURF) 2. SOD STABILIZATION BMP'S I. STRAW/HAY MnDOT TYPE I MULCH 2. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MnDOT CAT. 3 3. HYDROMULCH MnDOT TYPE 5 4. TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT SC250 NORTH AMERICAN GREEN OR EQUAL-MNDOT CAT 6 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING: MASS GRADING PHASE: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. 2. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 3. INSTALL THE PRE -GRADING SILT FENCES AND INLET PROTECTION BMPs ON THE SITE. 4. CONSTRUCT ALL PRE -GRADING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL BMPS. 5. COMPLETE MASS GRADING AND INSTALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANTING. 6. CONSTRUCT POST -GRADING SILT FENCE ON THE SITE. STREET & UTILITY PHASE: 1. INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, CURBS AND GUTTERS. 2. INSTALL RIP RAP AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURES. 3. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AROUND ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES. 4. PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING. 5. PAVE SITE. 6. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. 7. INSTALL POST STREET AND UTILITY SILT FENCE. 8. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (ONLY IF SITE IS STABILIZED), IF REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT SWPPP BMP QUANTITIES (PER PLAN 1. STANDARD SILT FENCE 353 LF 2. INLET PROTECTION 2 EA 3. DISTURBED GRADING AREA 0.59 AC 4. TOPSOIL RESPREAD AREA TBD AC 5. TOPSOIL RESPREAD VOLUME (6" THICKNESS) TBD CY 6. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 196 SY NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: CONCRETE WASHOUT THE MASS GRADING CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL EROSION AND I. CONCRETE WASHOUT IS DONE TRUCK SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) AS SHOWN IN THE RAHR PRESERVE BY TRUCK WITH A MOBILE WASHOUT MASS GRADING SWPPP (EXCEPT FOR POST GRADE BMPS NEEDED AFTER UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM PROVIDED AND COMPLETED ACTIVITY). THE BMPS ARE TO BE INSTALLED AT A MINIMUM AS SHOWN IN THE PLAN, IF BY THE CONCRETE CONTRACTOR. CONDITIONS ARISE, ADDITIONAL BMP SUPPLEMENTATION TO PREVENT SITE EROSION OR SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MAY BE NECESSARY. THE MASS GRADING CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL BMPS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE MASS GRADING ACTIVITIES AND SUBSEQUENT TEMPORARY SOIL STABILIZAl10N NECESSARY TO PREPARE SITE FOR STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AND HOME BUILDING. AT THE COMPLETION OF MASS GRADING WORK AND SATISFACTORY SITE SOIL STABILIZATION, THE DEVELOPER AND MASS GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE TRANSFER OF NPDES PERMIT RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE STREET AND UTILITY CONTRACTOR AND THE CITY. THE STREET AND UTILITY CONTRACTOR AND CITY WILL THEN ASSUME THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ANY IN -PLACE BMPS AS WELL AS INSTALL THE ADDITIONAL BMPS REQUIRED IN THE STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT SWPPP, UPON COMPLETION OF STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION, THE STREET AND UTILITY CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANY BMPS INSTALLED DURING THE STREET AND UTILITY PHASE THAT ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AND COORDINATE THE TRANSFER OF NPDES PERMIT RESPONSIBILITIES BACK TO THE DEVELOPER OR TERMINATE THE PORTION OF THE NPDES PERMIT TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY AND THEIR CONTRACTOR. EROSION CONTROL RESPONSIBLE PARTY: M NOTES: 1. EROSION CONTROL PLAN (SWPPP) INCLUDES PRIVATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WORK. 2. SEE SHEET 8 FOR ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE LEGEND: EXISTING CONTOUR 789 PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED RETAINING WALL DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE -- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE LOT LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY mommo PRE � SF mommo PROPOSED SILT FENCE (PRE GRADING) DND DO NOT DISTURB AREAS TEMPORARY DRAINAGE ROUTING DURING MASS GRADING EROSION CONTROL BLANKET m� V 0, 140 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com Q O to W Z I I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 219-0083 SHEET 8 of 12 5 FT. MIN. LENGTH STEEL POST 5 FT. MIN. LENGTH STEEL POST AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING -,AT 6 R. MAX. SPACING GEQTEXTILE FABRIC PLASTIC ZIP TIES 36 WIDE PLASTIC ZIP TES GEDTEXRIF FABRIC 36' WIDE �ABRIC (50 LB. TENSILE) (� �' IEN9LE) ANCHORAGE LOCATED IN TOP 8" TIRE COMPACTION ZONE LOCATED IN TOP 8" iRENCH.BACKFILI WITH TAMPED NATURAL SOIL i FLOW FLL_W FLOW 6"MIN. FLOW w O - Zg W Em ow MACHINE SLICE„$] 8.7 - 12" DEPTH 0 a. SILT FENCE, MACHINE SLICED 00 SILT FENCE, HEAVY DUTY 1 2 5 FT. MIN. LENGTH STEEL POSTOEOTEXTILE FABRIC AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING /-.�•• rFABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH. BACKFlLL / WITH TAMPED NATURAL SOIL N // 0 Z FLOW .- Z 'a SILT FENCE TO BE PLACED m 6" ON CONTOUR. SEE SLOPE/GRADE pC w IN, AND LENGTH CRITERIA BELOW SILT FENCE, PREASSEMBLED i 2 , VARIABLE LESS THAN 2% 100 FEET 2 - 5, R 75 FEET 5 -10% 50 FEET NOTES: 10 - 20 % 25 FEET SILT FENCE PER MNOOT SPECS, SOURCE 2005 GREATER THAN 20% 15 FEET SEE SPECS. 2573 & 3886. LOCATION OF SILT FENCE Q1 To Protect Area From Sheet Flow FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL 2 Maximum Contributing Area: 1 Acre SILT FENCE NEAR TOE OF V6 DESIRABLE 1: � SLOPE OUTSIDE OF ` CONSTRUCTION UMITS--'-'-'-"-'-� LOCATION OF SILT FENCE FOR PEREMITER CONTROL CPPYOF SILT CHIBASSEN FENCE REVISED: 3-12 PLATE NO.: FILE NAME: G: \ENG\SPECS\5300 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 5300 EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: vr�v A iY s!Y.ti!=iY.i�:l.. 1 •• NOTE: FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK. CITYOF CIOMEN ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE REVISED: 12-19 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLATE NO.: 5301 FILE NAME: G:\ENG\SPECS 5307 1. NO LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY SHALL OCCUR UNTIL A GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED FROM THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND THE WATERSHED DISTRICT. 2. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) REFER TO EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES DEFINED IN THE MPCA PROTECTING WATER QUALITY IN URBAN AREAS AND THE MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING HANDBOOK. 3. ALL BMP'S SELECTED SHALL BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE TIME OF YEAR, SITE CONDITIONS, AND ESTIMATED DURATION OF USE. 4. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDI NG TO THE APPROVED PLANS . ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED PLANS SHALL REQUIRE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. 5. A COPY OF THESE PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 6. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND DISTURBANCE LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NO DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE DISTURBED LIMITS. 7. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES, GRASS AND OTHER VEGETATIVE COVER TO HELP FILTER RUNOFF. 8. ESTABLISH A PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOILS WHERE LAND IS COMING OUT OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION. PLANT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH DENSE GRASS FILTER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND TO MINIMIZE WEED GROWTH. 9. ALL TREES NOT LISTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED. DO NOT OPERATE EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE DRIPLINE, ROOT ZONES OR WITHIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE AREAS. 10. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES (BMP'S) SHALL BE INSTALLED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES AND THEY SHALL BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. 11. SILT FENCE IS REQUIRED AT DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER OF DISTURBED AREAS AND STOCKPILES. PROTECT WETLANDS, WATERCOURSES AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES FROM SEDIMENTATION AND STORMWATER RUNOFF. 12. THE BMP'S SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND UNEXPECTED OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE, THE PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR SHALL ANTICIPATE THAT MORE BMP'S WILL BE NECESSARY TO ENSURE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ON THE SITE. DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR TO ADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND/OR CLIMATIC EVENTS AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BMP'S OVER AND ABOVE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, AS MAY BE NEEDED TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE PROTECTION OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES. 13. THE BMP'S SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED FUNCTIONING. SILT FENCES CLEANED OR REPLACED AT SEDIMENT BUILDUP OF 1/3 OF THE FENCE HEIGHT. 14. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL OCCUR IN INCREMENTS OF WORKABLE SIZE SUCH THAT ADEQUATE BMP CONTROL CAN BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. THE SMALLEST PRACTICAL AREA SHALL BE EXPOSED OR OTHERWISE DISTURBED AT ANY ONE TIME. 15. OPERATE TRACK EQUIPMENT (DOZER) UP AND DOWN EXPOSED SOIL SLOPES ON FINAL PASS, LEAVING TRACK GROOVES PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE. DO NOT BACK -BLADE. LEAVE A SURFACE ROUGH TO MINIMIZE EROSION. 16. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED FROM EROSION WITHIN 7 DAYS OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF GRADING IN THAT AREA. TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH SHALL COVER ALL EXPOSED SOILS IF GRADING COMPLETION IS DELAYED LONGER THAN 7 DAYS. PERMANENT SEED AND MULCH OR SOD IS REQUIRED WITHIN 3 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING. 17. GENERAL TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT MIX 190 ® 100 LBS. PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL. PERMANENT SEED SHALL BE MNDOT MIX 270 ® 120 LBS. PER ACRE OR APPROVED EQUAL. (PLANTING DATES PER SPEC 2575) MULCH SHALL BE MNDOT TYPE 1 (CLEAN OAT STRAW) ® 2 TONS PER ACRE AND DISK ANCHORED IN PLACE OR APPROVED EQUAL. FERTILIZER SHALL BE 80-80-80 NPK PER ACRE (UNLESS P RESTRICTIONS APPLY) AND INCORPORATED INTO THE SEED BED. 18. WETLAND BUFFER AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LANDSCAPE PLAN. 19. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AFTER THE TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. 20. AN ALTERNATE EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR LAND DISTURBANCES ON EACH LOT AS PART OF ANY FUTURE BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURES AND DRIVEWAYS. SEDIMENT TRAP MANUFACTURED BY WIMCO,LLC.SHAKOPEE, MN., ESS BROS., CORCORAN, MN. OR EQUAL 5PEC1F1CA71IQNS AND STikPWARD,5. pfS1GN LOADS MC tDj{y!,LcE.$][ _OQMURSI gar Eg1IGN. uI_Wo LE A E Klorr tDW MIA Aes DIA_.., sssETr RK'mP N/A n cm IPze - 71..STda&.P➢s, WsTm cow RATE (Mwvw TW E M FUERIi 0,707 as e V HCA0 NAns a OKRROW RACE 5.9. C's O 15' HEM MOD L#CG23 091ECTOR PIATE CAPU7.OW i - CENTER OF F71.7EF ASS WLY /-OkERROW 2 - TOP OF CUR8 BOX r 10" FN TER ASSEMBLY CURB HIGH-R.ON 11CH-ROW FABRIC NOTES: 1. CLEAN FILTER MEDIA AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT AND REPLACE IF FILTER IS CLOGGED WITH SEDIMENT. 2. REMOVE DEBRIS/SEDIMENT FROM RECEPTACLE AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. *affOF CATCH BASIN OMEN SEDIMENT TRAP REVISED: 1-10 PLATL NO.: [FILL NAME:G\ENG\SPECS\5302A ENGINEERING DEPAiiTME.N1 530)A EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE: 1. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLITION, SILT FENCE AND FILTERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN TO INTERCEPT RUNOFF. 2. ALL EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATIONS SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD CONDITION BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL THE SITE HAS BEEN RE -VEGETATED. CONTRACTOR MAY REMOVE NECESSARY SILT FENCING/FILTERS TO CONSTRUCT ROADWAYS, WHILE MAINTAINING ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL IN ADJACENT AREA. 3. SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED TO ALLOW FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF 4" OF TOPSOIL FOR DISTURBED AREAS TO BE RE -VEGETATED. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE SITE GRADING, UTILITY INSTALLATION AND PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION SO THAT THE GENERAL SITE CAN BE MULCHED AND RE -SEEDED SOON AFTER DISTURBANCE. AREAS THAT WILL NOT BE SUBJECT TO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL BE SEEDED (MnDOT MIX 190 ® 100#/AC AND MULCHED OR SODDED WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF BEING DISTURBED. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS INDICATED ON THIS EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIRED BASED ON MEANS, METHODS AND SEQUENCES OF CONSTRUCTION. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: 1. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MINIMIZE SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLETS. 2. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERMITERS BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. THESE PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 3. THE TIMING OF THE INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES. ANY SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY MUST BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. HOWEVER, SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. 4. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED. 5. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCES OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND CANNOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORM WATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS AND DITCHES. 6. SITE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES WILL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT EACH ENTRANCE FINAL STABILIZATION: THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE, OR ANOTHER OWNER/OPERATOR (PERMITTEE) HAS ASSUMED CONTROL OF ALL AREAS OF THE SITE THAT HAVE NOT UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION. FINAL STABILIZATION CAN BE ACHIEVED IN THE FOLLOWING WAY: ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AT THE SITE HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND ALL SOILS MUST BE STABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OVER THE ENTIRE PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA, OR OTHER EQUIVALENTMEANS NECESSARY TO PREVENT SOIL FAILURE UNDER EROSIVE CONDITIONS AND; A. ALL DRAINAGE DITCHES, CONSTRUCTED TO DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, MUST BE STABILIZED TO PRECLUDE EROSION; B. ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC, AND STRUCTURAL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS (SUCH AS SILT FENCE) MUST BE REMOVED AS PART OF THE SITE FINAL STABILIZATION; AND C. THE CONTRACTORS MUST CLEAN OUT ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES AND FROM TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BASINS. SEDIMENT MUST BE STABILIZED TO PREVENT IT FROM BEING WASHED BACK INTO THE BASIN, CONVEYANCES OR DRAINAGE WAYS DISCHARGING OFF -SITE OR TO SURFACE WATERS. THE CLEAN OUT OF PERMANENTBASINS MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO RETURN THE BASIN TO DESIGN CAPACITY. SAMPLE EROSION CONTROL MANirNN A 16 Poor DUPPER PLAN FOR INDIVIDUAL LQTS IWIVON OF WATER AND M"URRED Sal:. 2 ROWS OF TYPE 2 Hf,AV _ i'[[RT��t� TER CORTROL 5 A 9iAPnGE WAVR t%t WxtFRwAr v ME REa. AOJACENY LOT 1 _ SURTACE WATERS LOT 3 - d-Hmllf. SILT FENVE X TOGETHER AT PROPERry LINE OPTION t - aVEe-CAP LEGEND I I Tr,... ete.dmd rr ad,:.m Ire Tr... in Me dmrlRq. ,,AA .�q,f� ALT FENOE Raw �.pF 'ShX SMAWMUI- I I PmaaETER [( C' � � iqC --'-'- WATER FLAW �"'WR8 @ W1TaY aVYR-Lip 9LT FENCE STREET STORM SEWER WT 'ENAhANai F0 N NLG9J� CF1S?L awned OR swrcue Raft PROTECTION DETuL 5302.A * Water resources staff must be cantaafed before any/Ali dewatmt1g activity * Perimeter sediment controls are necessary at damastoping property and street Sagas, Note thatsediment controls need to pravkle containment by turning perimeter controls upeflopt-lata PropextyA • Perimeter controls cam include film togs, mulcts berme andfar silt fence. * See MNOot spec. 3897 & Y7S73. Temporary stockpiles cannot. be Placed k, drainage Swat", surface waters, or on public streets, and must hove perinT, tm central ER.OSiON COPITROL * Topsoil -Site has a minBmumn of 4-6 inches of topsail, * Construction entrance-1 to 2" clean crusted rock at a depth of 6 Inches. * House Roof Permeter--Strae match at 2 leeches deep around house di ectly below roof tine, if house has join fuiters, downpouts need energy dissipation. Slopes -$teepee than 4t 1 with positive grime to surface waters of the state need erosion control blankets and temporary ar permanent seeding. • See MNDot Spec. 3885 & 2575. * Swoles-Need blankets over f'noT 200'. * Swoles-Neod check mans It slope 1$ 4:1 a' greater. CFCYOF EROSION CONTROL FOR mom INDIVIDUAL LOTS (TYP.) idEV{SED: 3-19 PLATEN ENAME:G:\ENG\SP€CS\5302B ERtGtNEE'T2lN" DEPAf?TMENT 5302I3 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: 1. INSPECT SILT FENCES IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. IMMEDIATELY REPAIR FAILED OR FAILING SILT FENCE. 2. REPLACEMENT - FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY WHEN IT DECOMPOSES OR BECOMES INEFFECTIVE BEFORE THE BARRIER IS NO LONGER NECESSARY. 3. SEDIMENT REMOVAL - SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. ANY SEDIMENT REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER FABRIC IS NO LONGER REQUIRED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED, AND SEEDED WITH THE APPROPRIATE SEED MIX, OR SODDED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 4. REMOVAL OF SILT FENCE - SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE, BUT NOT BEFORE THE UPWARD SLOPING AREA HAS BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. IF THE UPWARD SLOPING AREA IS TO BE EXPOSED LONGER THAN SIX (6) MONTHS, THAT AREA SHALL BE COVERED WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION WHEN FIRST EXPOSED. 5. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. 6. ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE RECORDED IN WRITING AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP RECORDS OF EACH INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY SHALL INCLUDE: A. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; B. NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; C. FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS; D. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVIES. E. DATE AND AMOUNT OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH (0.5 INCHES) IN 24 HOURS: F. DOCUMENTS OF CHANGES MADE TO THE SWPPP AS REQUIRED IN PART III.A.4. 7. WHERE PARTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE HAVE UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION, BUT WORK REMAINS ON OTHER PARTS OF SITE, INSPECTIONS OF THE STABILIZED AREAS MAY BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH. WHERE WORK HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE MUST TAKE PLACE AS SOON AS RUNOFF OCCURS AT THE SITE OR PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON THE SITE: 1. SOLID WASTE: COLLECTED SEDIMENT, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS, FLOATING DEBRIS, PAPER, PLASTIC, FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL: OIL, GASOLINE, PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. 3. CONCRETE WASHOUT IS DONE TRUCK BY TRUCK WITH A MOBILE WASHOUT SYSTEM PROVIDED AND COMPLETED BY THE CONCRETE CONTRACTOR. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. 4. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE w TRACKED EQUIPMENT TREADS CREATE GROOVES PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE DIRECTION. UNDISTURBED VEGETATION 1 V jgo 00 SLOPE 00 pe,.- �j d- oft f� NOTE: ALL SLOPES WITH A GRADE EQUAL TO OR STEEPER THAN 3:1 REQUIRE SLOPE TRACKING. SLOPES WITH A GRADE MORE GRADUAL THAN 3:1 REQUIRE SLOPE TRACKING IF THE STABILIZATION METHOD IS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR HYDROMULCH. SLOPE TRACKING ANCHOR TRENCH (SEE DETAIL AND NOTES BELOW) N AM LAo' STAPLE PATTERN/DENSITY SHALL FOLLOW MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS ANCHOR TRENCH 1. DIG 6" X 6" TRENCH 2. LAY BLANKET IN TRENCH 3. STAPLE AT 1.T INTERVALS 4. BACKFlLL WITH NATURAL SOIL AND COMPACT 5. BLANKET LENGTH SHALL NOT EXCEED 100' WITHOUT AN ANCHOR TRENCH NOTE: SLOPE SURFACE SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS, SOIL CLUMPS, STICKS, VEHICLE IMPRINTS, AND GRASS. BLANKETS SHALL HAVE GOOD SOIL CONTACT. OVERLAP END JOINTS MINIMUM OF 6" AND STAPLE OVERLAP AT 15INTERVALS. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALLATION LONGITUDINAL JOINTS MINIMUM OF 6" ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www. al l i a nt-i n c. co rn J O U. O z oC ~ z LLI Z N VI G Q a J W z W z U IlL I hereby certify that this plai specification, or report was prepared by me or under m, direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER uncle the laws of the State of MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 219-0083 u SHEET 9 of 12 35'R TEMP CUL-DE-SAC SEE CITY PLATE 5205E _ (DESIGN MODIFIED 1035.23TC/HP TO BE OFFSET) iT 4" BITUMINOUS CURB °o 1033.19T AR 1032.94T A` b' \ R20' i - 1033.1 C REMOVE EXISTING 1032 1 T PAVEMENT AS REQUIRED ry FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION INSTALL TEMPORARY BARRICADES 32.17TC �'` 032.8 C 033.02 032.69T SURMOUNTABLE i 32.75EX CURB AND GUTTER 031.66T RECONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY Gi PER CITY DETAIL N V Oxoc MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS O / TO EXISTING HOME DURING OCONTRUCTION EX. STREET LIGHT 0 10 20 40 � SCALE IN FEET UTILITY NOTES: 1. EXISTING UTILITIES, SERVICE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL UTILITY WORK WITHIN THE R.O.W. SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ENGINEERING GUIDELINES. 4. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ANY UTILITY WORK. 5. PROVIDE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL IN COMPLIANCE WITH MNDOT 'TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS -FIELD MANUAL" LATEST REVISION, FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN PUBLIC R.O.W. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE SEWER AND WATER DEPARTMENT 24 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY PUBLIC SEWER/WATERMAIN CONNECTION. 7. SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CITY OF CHANHASSEN SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. 8. WATERMAIN SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CITY OF CHANHASSEN SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. _ k� 9. TYPICAL LOT SERVICES: SAN - 6" PVC SOLVENT WELDED SDR 26 (SEE DETAIL 2001) 1Efi § WAT - 1" TYPE "K" COPPER (SEE DETAIL 1006) _", � � � 3 ,i"i dye . �g�;'...t-.✓ LEGEND: - - - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE - - BUILDING SETBACK PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE - - ROW - EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY EXISTING FIBER OPTIC EXISTING GAS - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER S = SANITARY SERVICE WYE STATION (FROM DOWNSTREAM MH) IE = SANITARY SERVICE INVERT ELEVATION CBE = CURB BOX ELEVATION LFE = LOW FLOOR ELEVATION I ' a I i 4 r R � - Ji, _,- . I KT... ter. + j . .. •_._• 2 /..._ /' • -' • -/ DELINEATED WETLAND I BLOCK I I I S=0+64 IE=1024.20 /.:LL.=:LLi OUTLOT A I CBE=1032.0 I LFE=1027.5 4 _ ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com SAN MH 2 N PROPOSED LOT SERVICES ® 10' SEPARATION DUE TO LIMITED VERTICAL SAN MH 1 SEPARATION BETWEEN SERVICES c 'x J< .. Q � 0 20 40 80 x 1EX. FIRE HYDRANT SCALE IN FEET V" Q O Z � w O z J_ LL J p a c m Z Q //�/ c// Z Ja J a � J a Q Z Z Cn � 0 c W z a W (A IO SAN MH 2 Q Q - Uj 1060 STA:3+34.13 1060 = J LV OFF: 0.00 _ _ _ W Z W SAN MH 1 BUILD:7.01 STA:2+50.00 RIM:1030.0( Z U IL (n OFF:0.00 INV OUT:1022.99 (W) BUILD: 10.56 RIM:1033.11 1 hereby certify that this plan, INV IN:1022.65 (E) specification, or report was 1050 EX SAN MH INV OUT:1022.55 (SW) 1050 prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I STA:1 +81.53 OFF.0.03R _ am a duly Licensed BUILD:10.42 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the state of RIM 1032.60 p O o o'er MINNESOTA INV IN: 1022.28 (NE) r) Nr0 O w Q ri o M INV OUT:1022.18 (SW) Lo NL 0- 0 . r r) + o o ro + o p o O MARK RAUSCH, PE 1040 (000 +_+ N N + 0 1040 II p II II p _ _ Date License No. II II II , QLLJ> aw ¢w QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL a w� � U) w N w (n w 11 II ~wlnw , 3.00% &�5°� J 2,00% 1.00 Uj v~ w BY DATE 1030 - - - _ \ ` ���°9 28.00% 1030 DATE ISSUE 3-27-20 CITY SUBMITTAL / STA = 3+50.00 - ELEV = 1025.57 S,r W EX - - - 1020 EX 8" PVC 68.4' of 8" 84.0' of 8" - - - - - ------------- 1020 _SDR_ 35 ® 0.40% SDR 35 ®'0.40% ASSUMED W/M MIN. COVER = 7.5' PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR 1010 1010 DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 219-0083 o r r rn (0 0) 0) o p 0 0 M N M 0 0 -0 N M 00 M 0 cO N 00 rrj M 1n N 00 N N N N 0 0 N 0 N N N 0 0 10 1+OC 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 SHEET 10 Of 12 m { - _ - V L 63RD STREET eT ;�,... y. 4 \ J I ;4 - � I , \ I {3- --- I I I � rDE _ I Qi ' X'EOF t10204EA -k2 LAND �!iT A 0CK 1 A -- - i 1�/f{ (_ 5 TAKO, / •/ EX151 INU L ANUF'Y UUVtzh UANUF'Y UALUULA 1 IUIN LEGEND EXISTING CANOPY COVERAGE PROPOSED CANOPY COVERAGE TO REMAIN SquareAcres Description % Feet A Net Site Area (excludes wetlands) 100% 237,794 5.459 B Existing Canopy Coverage 449/. 105,761 2.428 C Required Minimum Canopy Coverage 35% 83,228 1.911 (Low Density Residential) D Proposed Canopy Coverage 40% 95,113 2.183 Difference between Proposed 0 Tree s E Canopy Coverage & Required Canopy -11,885 Req'd Coverage =D -C OV40 ovk Rev'0 n ��GFo k N 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com H HM W Z W a Q W J 0 a a J � Q W Q O o �' U } O Z 0}C IL O w Z Z J W W z W W z (.3 a t- I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA IMARK RAUSCH, PE Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 219-0083 11 SHEET 11 of 12 i I 63RD I I - STREET o k v e 3AIhP a 1-KENTUCKY COFFEETREE \ k— y I C'F, iilYJ? f�: t 5 �, 1 / }r t — t h �L f - i F-' J r r 'WEST - t v 1 � ia. T t J y "PC vR`Y _rtvc Al ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com t h r 1 Y l t �1 s „ --a>, / I•�._`" i ;._ � I { 'EXISTING TREES h tt 5,== t° ', Y1 l r \ 1 ` i =c ` i I TO REMAIN � Ir r SEED MI ER LAND BUFF X, SEE LE w - } WETLAND X EOF ±1020.4 DELINEATED LE GEND cc f `t^ it �\ / -. / / EXISTING TREES i �, I LL'+�'G: WETLAND TO REMAIN- µ -1 I ,j ��� OUTLOT A () _ 1Y .I ... N (R. :.-, ;, f-�,�j„ .�A; `Y -i-„\ s _ / _"� \ i _ a,.,. r :N4 „w.12 E( / /-+ t.„ .r / t ..} +t \ t s ^i ,/kK:At< BLOCK I O /� I �. �,., V V CO N 00 i —_�_ C \ 4-"`�- s } /:.. O O iii i� vY-� 3�tiEfRl �::" 1 ,.�,,. ,. k O O t t ..t, µ `. : q:,. t.,stra` - .- Grzk: ..��.+ L �.--• -S_.. + { `iat 1-KENTUCKY COFFEETREE 4 -t . tf )�\ / l ? \ ^., _�. ,�T.....if�E *. UTILI Y.3A;_' 2ENT�L INE'. I 1 I .. '.;�:+w' t� r. �. ....-�, V.� T 1 :., .-::... r'v,^?. t. !�-,C �•_:. _+- ? e'M>! r� pF; JJI e,.. !'�'v'. �f `-i- t ! ,t '` t ��'} ...11 ..i~^a.' _.' ...'1 t-..- :�.^.:E:.' i�i t _,j "�✓.G;\, _.�.f I(�l-aiL�iy�\ -. h. �,.. �nx, ..., G4/t - - k Y ..-: i - , .iz--:_ -._n. .._- .�--,- /i ._�, n'. rJ�, rt; 9 d 't �t� 4 •\-. -k..�, _. ,,,_ _-;,.;;,'� � / �t�,l _�[1F ii ... -e ., -s w-_,cY,---._ _. .-: .. / t :-_+ , t, ..7 _ ''�i.. r tt _� -.-1 r� " A-}=S"4ti +{`.:M Nt s _ — �. - „____�— h>,c.__•___�' ..„,.r } \ _( 1 ,i.- } S. i �'—\:t..n---C- i ik'.__>— -ri" t t:tJ_j�A i,' _. _. _._ -_ ....._ __... _.. a ,. . } ,y ,y. .S ,, l ..... ... k ..ter"'-t k:.. — — r o.=.: _ _.._ ... _ — __ _. v _ , 14-STAGHORN SUMAC �- F•tiCE - ...-._. .-� ___ __ _ \ ,.. /i' C - _._. -_- _ _.....- _ -_.. - -. IT, LING LINE�.i NOR H ,; KOM e CUl ' / \ GENERAL Z LAJ TA A TRAIL , 8: i 10 \ ROADSIDE k, Z SEE MIX 0 SEE LEGEND Z LLI in N li W z J I i 4r} z V A'T t � / \ l ��.�� I hereby certify specification, or s prepared by me direct supervisiot /O o Licen LA ARCH a duly LANDSCAPE ARCH O the laws of the MINNESOTA PLANTING NOTES SEED PLANTING NOTES LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 1. INSTALL 6" MIN. TOP SOIL TO ALL SOD AND SEED AREAS. FINE GRADE ALL SOD WETLAND BUFFER SEED MIX: MN STATE SEED MIX 34-271, RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION LANDSCAPE REQUIRED = 1 TREE PER LOT PLACED IN THE FRONT YARD AND SEED AREAS. SEEDING RATE TO BE 12 LBS/ACRE (PURE LIVE SEED) PROVIDED = 1 TREE PER LOT (2 TREES TOTAL) 2. STAKE OR MARK ALL PLANT MATERIAL LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3. INSTALL 4-6" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ROOT SAUCER OF GENERAL ROADSIDE SEED MIX: MN STATE SEED MIX 25-141, ALL TREES ISOLATED FROM PLANT BEDS. SEEDING RATE TO BE 59 LBS/ACRE (PURE LIVE SEED) 4. PLANTING SOIL SHALL CONSIST OF 1:1:1 SELECT LOAMY TOPSOIL, PEAT MOSS, PIT RUN SAND. APPLY SEED PER THE FOLLOWING: MULCH SEEDED AREAS WITH Mn/DOT TYPE 3 5. COMPLETELY GUARANTEE ALL WORK FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR BEGINNING AT (MCIA CERTIFIED WEED FREE) MULCH AT A RATE OF I TON PER ACRE WITHIN 48 THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. MAKE ALL REPLACEMENTS PROMPTLY (AS PER HOURS OF SEEDING. MULCH SHOULD THEN BE DISC ANCHORED TO KEEP IT FROM DIRECTION OF OWNER). BLOWING AWAY. 6. ALL MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED FROM APRIL 15 - JULY 20 OR SEPTEMBER 20 - 7. ALL TREE TRUNKS SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH BROWN CREPE TREE WRAP. APPLY FREEZE UP. IF HYDROSEEDING UTILIZE APPROXIMATELY 500 GALLONS OF WATER WRAP IN NOVEMBER AND REMOVE IN APRIL. PER ACRE. REFER TO MN/DOT SPEC 3884 FOR PROPER INSTALLATION OF 8. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 FOR LOCATING ALL HYDRO -SEED. ALL NATIVE SEEDS USED ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CERTIFIED TO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND AVOID DAMAGE TO UTILITIES DURING THE COURSE BE OF MINNESOTA ORIGIN BY THE MINNESOTA CROP IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION OF THE WORK. (MCIA). SITE TO BE PREPARED BY LOOSENING TOPSOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 9. MAINTAIN ALL PLANT MATERIALS, INCLUDING WATERING, UNTIL THE TIME OF INCHES. THE SITE TO BE HARROWED OR RAKED FOLLOWING SEEDING, AND THEN ACCEPTANCE. PACKED USING A CULTI-PACKER OR EQUIVALENT. SEE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL FOR 10. COORDINATE INSTALLATION WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR. REFERENCE. 11. STAKING AND GUYING OF TREES OPTIONAL: MAINTAIN PLUMBNESS OF TREES FOR DURATION OF WARRANTY PERIOD. MAINTAIN SEEDED AREAS BY WATERING, REMULCHING AND REPLANTING AS 12. SWEEP AND WASH ALL PAVED SURFACES AND REMOVE ALL DEBRIS RESULTING NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH A UNIFORMLY DENSE STAND OF THE SPECIFIED GRASSES FROM LANDSCAPE OPERATIONS. UNTIL ACCEPTED. ANY AREAS FAILING TO ESTABLISH A STAND SHALL BE 13. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE COUNTY/STATE SOIL & EROSION RESEEDED, REFERTILIZED AND REMULCHED WHENEVER 70% VEGETATIVE COVER IS CONTROL SPECIFICATION FOR DISTURBED AREA STABILIZATION. NOT ACHIEVED. RESEEDING SHALL CONFORM IN ALL RESPECTS TO THESE SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE TO THE WORK AREAS RESULTING FROM EROSION AND/OR EQUIPMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR DAMAGE, INCLUDING REGRADING, RESEEDING, ETC. AS NECESSARY, BEFORE SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE OCCURS. LEGEND 0 OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREES 0 DECIDUOUS SHRUBS WETLAND BUFFER SEED MIX: MN STATE SEED MIX 34-271 (WET MEADOW SOUTH & WEST) INFILTRATION AREA SEED MIX: MN STATE SEED MIX 25-141 (MESIC GENERAL ROADSIDE) Q F_ In `n r J Q Z Z U. a W Z Q C_ V L W Z a hat this plan, report was or under my I and that I sed ITECT under State of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 219-0083 12 SHEET 12 of 12 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO.2020-06 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 7:00 p.m- in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for approval for the subdivision of 6.4 acres into two single-family lots with variances for property located at 1641 W. 63rd Street. Zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF). Applicant: Woody Love, Engle and Volkers. Property Owner: Ann Nye. Subdivision: Nye Addition. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the city's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2020-06 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner Email: SAl-Jaff(dci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1134 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on April 23, 2020) smwwo gAp1an12020 planning cascs\20-06 nye propeMNph notice to villager.docx COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 CITY OF CHMNSEN Phone: (952) 227-1130 I Fax: (952) 227-1110 AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline Agency Review Request Date: Agency Review Response Deadline: Date Application Filed: March 30, 2020 Aril 23, 2020 March 27, 2020 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Sharmeen AI-Jaff 952-227-1134 sagaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Senior Planner Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60-Day Review Period Deadline: May 5, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. May 26, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. June 2, 2020 Application: Request for the subdivision of 6.4 acres into two single-family lots with variances. The site is located north of Wood Duck Lane and south of West 63rd Street. The site is zoned Single -Family Residential District RSF , Nye Addition. PlanningCase: 2020-06 Web Pa e: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2020-06 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: Federal Agencies: Adjacent Cities: ❑ Attorney ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Chaska ® Building Official ❑ US Fish & Wildlife ❑ Eden Prairie ® Engineer ❑ Jackson Township ® Fire Marshal Watershed Districts: ❑ Minnetonka ® Forester ❑ Shorewood ® Park Director ❑ Carver County El Victoria r ® Water Resources ❑ Lower River El Law Enforcement ® Minnehaha Creek Adjacent Counties: El Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Carver County Agencies: ❑ HennepinUtilities: ❑ Scott ❑ Community Development ® Cable TV— Mediacom El Engineer School Districts: ❑ Environmental Services ❑ Electric— Minnesota Valley El Historical Society ® Electric — Xcel Energy ❑ Eastern Carver County 112 ❑ Parks ElMagellan Pipeline ❑ Minnetonka 276 El Soil &Water Conservation District ® Natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy ® Phone — Centuryi-ink Other Agencies: State Agencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad ElBoard of Water & Soil Resources Authority ❑ MN Landscape Arboretum El Health ❑ Historical Society ❑ SouthWestTransit El Natural Resources -Forestry ❑ TC&W Railroad ❑ Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control ❑ Transportation SCANNED Subdivision - Nye Addition - Planning Case 2020-06 $0.00 Consolidate Lots $0.00 Lot Line Adjustment $300.00 Subdivision ($600 + $15 per lot) $700.00 Final Plat $0.00 Vacation $267.00 Property Owners List ($3.00 x 89) $0.00 Variance $200.00 Notification Sign $0.00 Deeds $0.00 Easement $1,467.00 TOTAL $1,467.00 Ck #9200 from Ann Nye $0.00 Balance Owed $0.00 Adjustment Au r-A- Q0 _') 0 -CA(e COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF CHANHASSFN Planriing Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW �/' Submittal Date: 013 o7C PC Date:'i, CC Date:'S a 60-Day Review Date: (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑✓ Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers..... $100 Z Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ( lots) ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots) .................................. $300 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Consolidate Lots ............ .................................. $150 ❑ Interim Use Permit IUP El Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑° Final Plat.............................................$700 El In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 (Includes $450 escrow forr attorney costs)* ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 'Additional escrow may be required for other applications ❑ Rezoning (REZ) through the development contract. ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD................. $100 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ All Others.........................................................$500 ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Sign Plan Review ................................ ................... $150 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ Administrative..................................................$100 ❑ All Others ................ ....................................... $275 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts* ...................... $500 ❑ Zoning Appeal $100 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: ...................................................... thousand square feet) 'Include ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) $500 number of axis tino employees: ................. Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts .......................................... $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_unitsnits) the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. 0 Notification Sign (City to install and remove)...................................................................................................................... $200 Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address ( 89 addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply) .................................................... .......... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements (_ easements) ❑ Deeds TOTAL FEE: $1,467.00 Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Requesting approval to subdivide 1 existing residential parcel into 2 single family residential lots. Property Address or Location: Parcel #: 254150012 Total Acreage: 6.40 1641 63rd St W Legal Description: Lot 3, Block 1, Lenvilla Estates, Carver Wetlands Present? 0 Yes ❑ No , Minnesota Present Zoning: Single -Family Residential District (RSF) Requested Zoning: Single -Family Residential District (RSF) Present Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Requested Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Existing Use of Property: 1 Single Family Residence [DCheck box if separate narrative is attached. Auth ntlsign:D: 9BEDF94F.B06A-4122-ABC6.3147C5D39EM Section••• Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Engel & Volkers Contact: Woody Love Address: 18202 Minnetonka Blvd, Ste 100 Phone: (612) 695-3001 City/State/Zip: Deephaven, MN. 55391 Cell: Email: Aw,ewisa•, woody@woodylove.com Fax: Signature: ZZM Date: 3.182020 11:1200 A CDT PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Ann Nye - Trustee Contact: Ann Nye Address: 1641 63rd St. W Phone: City/State/Zip: Chanhassen, MN. 55331 Cell: Email: ADtherai � annnye@q.com Fax: Signature: Iam Nye J%gf4t Date: This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Alliant Engineering, Inc. Contact: Mark Rausch Address: 733 Marquette Ave Ste. 700 Phone: (612) 758-3080 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN. 55402 Cell: Email: mrausch@alliant-inc.com Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: ❑✓ Property Owner Via: ❑✓ Email Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑✓ Applicant Via: Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑✓ Engineer Via: [D Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other* Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMR FORM AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Woody Love <woody@woodylove.com> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 3:09 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Cc: Mark Rausch; CenturyLink Customer; Tim Keane Subject: 63rd Sharmeen I have talked with Mark. As applicant, we are aware that we are submitting early. Further, we are aware that any time periods, specifically the 60 day rule, does not begin until the application deadline of April 3, 2020. Please contact me with any need for further clarification. Woody Love 612.695.3001 Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy Notel O+. SCANNED PREI IINARY SUBDIVISION AND FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE CITY OF CHANH - 'N RECEIVEC NYE ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA MAR 2 7, March 27, 2020 CHA%WEN M ANNI% SITE INFORMATION Legal Description: Lot 3, Block 1, Lenvilla Estates, Carver County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. Address: 1641 631d Street West, Chanhassen, MN PID: 254150012 EXISTING SITE DESCRIPATION The development site is 6.4 acres in size and currently contains one single family residence with multiple accessory buildings. The property is irregular in shape with frontage along 63 s Street to the north and to Wood Duck Lane right of way to the south. The property abuts existing residential properties to the east, west and southwest. Right of way access is available to 631 St and to the Wood Duck Lane corridor. A small wetland has been delineated in the east side of the property and there are existing ponds and wetlands on the west half of the property currently covered by existing drainage and utility easement. PROPOSED PRELMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN The proposed development plan consists of a low -density single-family residential subdivision that splits an existing parcel into 2 single family residential lots. The existing home would remain on 1 parcel and a new home would be constructed on the new lot. Comprehensive Plan Designation The application area has a Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation of Residential Low Density. The adjacent land uses are also Residential Low Density. The Residential Low Density land use guides for single family housing density of 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre. The proposed development plan has a net density of 0.89 units per net acre due to the irregular shape of the property and desire to keep the existing homestead in place. _Land Use Density Calculation: Gross Site Acreage 6.403 acres Wetland Area (Outlot A) 0.336 acres Existing Drainage/Utility Easement on Lot 1 3.472 acres Wood Duck Lane R/W Dedication 0.123 acres Net Acreage 2.472 acres Net Density (2 lots) 0.81 units per acre Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal March 27, 2020 Nye Subdivision — Chanhassen, MN Page 1 of 4 honing Classification The property has a current zoning classification of RSF — Single Family Residential District as do the surrounding properties to the north, east, west and south. The proposed subdivision is consistent with RSF standards. A summary of required and proposed lot standards criteria for RSF zoning is as follows: Required PLoposed Lot Area - Minimum 15,000 SF 36,196 SF (0.83 ac) Average Lot Area N/A 128,793 SF (2.96 ac) Lot Width/Frontage — Minimum 90, 154.2' Lot Depth — Minimum 125' 192' Setbacks: Front 30' 30' Rear — Principal 30' 30' Side — Garage 10, 10, Side — Principal 10, 10, Minimum Right -of -Way Width 60' N/A, RW dedication as City requested Subdivision Features and Benefits • 1 new single-family home and the preservation of the existing homestead on 2nd lot. • Preservation of onsite wetlands and provision of additional wetland buffer area. • Outlot creation over the easterly wetland area. • Outlot A to be provided to the City for public dedication of 0.336 acres after final platting. • Wetland buffer creation in the stricter of watershed requirements. The buffer area proposed on Lot 2 will also be covered by drainage and utility easement as will all of Outlot A. • Dedication of additional Wood Duck Lane right of way of 0.123 acres. • Public land dedication totaling 0.459 acres. • Extension of public sanitary sewer 150 lineal feet to the east within Wood Duck Lane right of way. • Reconstruction of the existing Wood Duck Lane cul-de-sac in accordance with the City's temporary cul-de- sac design dimension of 70' in diameter. Vehicular Site Access and Pedestrian Circulation The proposed subdivision does not require construction of a linear extension of new public roadway or walkways. Right of way access for vehicles and pedestrians is available to both proposed lots. The existing home to be on Lot Twill maintain the existing connection to 63nd Street and the new lot (Lot 2) will connect to existing Wood Duck Lane right of way. The subdivision will be required to reconstruct the existing cul-de-sac at the end of Wood Duck Lane. The existing cul-de-sac was previously not built to City standard and is dimensionally too small for a large vehicle to turn around. The design plans propose to reconstruct the cul-de-sac in accordance with City Detail Plate 5205B with a 70' diameter. The cul-de-sac is located in an area with significant grade change to the north, likely the reason of the undersized current cul-de-sac. The proposed increase to 70' in diameter will require regrading of the north slope any larger cul-de-sac could result in need for retaining wall in the right of way. Grading and Topography Preliminazv Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal March 27, 2020 Nye Subdivision — Chanhassen, MN Page 2 of 4 I Minimal grading will be required for the proposed subdivision. Grading will be needed to reconstruct the existing cul-de-sac, install a required sanitary trunk sewer extension and construct one new home. All earthmoving activities necessary for construction will require erosion and sediment control per City of Chanhassen and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District requirements. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain The project does not require extension of any public sanitary sewer or watermain trunk lines with 63rd Street, in which, utilities exist. Lot I and the existing home will continue to be connected to the 63' Street trunk sanitary and water mains via existing services. The City has required as part of a subdivision request that the existing sanitary sewer in Wood Duck Lane be extended east approximately 150 lineal feet within existing public right of way. The proposed new Lot 2 will have a sanitary sewer service connection to the trunk sewer. A trunk watermain currently exists within the Wood Duck Lane right of way and Lot 2 will connect a new water service to that line. Stormwater Management The development site is located within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; however, the City of Chanhassen and the City's Surface Water Management Plan provides governmental jurisdiction. The proposed development's size of 2 lots and minimal impact area does not trigger any stormwater management requirements from the City of Chanhassen nor MCWD and thus no new stormwater treatment facilities are required. Wetland Management The site east wetland was delineated by Alliant Engineering, Inc in Fall of 2019 and the delineation and classification was approved by the City of Chanhassen and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The following is a summary of the buffer requirements for the project: Local Governmental Unit City of Chanhassen I Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Wetland Buffer Strip Principal Accessory Structure Wetland Average Base Min. Avg Base Classification Requirement Structure Setback to Classification Buffer Width Buffer Width Setback to Buffer Buffer Required` Requredz MANAGE 2 20 30 15 MANAGE 2 30 24 Notes: 1) Minnehaha Creek Watershed District allows a 2' base buffer width reduction for every 5%decrease in average buffer slope from 20%. 2) Proposed buffer averages 10% or less throughout thus the min. buffer can be reduced to 241.(30 - 2' • 2 = 241) The development plan assumes the most conservative buffer application as defined above by proposing buffers in compliance with MCWD and structure buffer setbacks in accordance with the City rules. In general this results in a combined buffer and buffer setback that slightly exceeds the City's standalone requirement. The following is a summary of the proposed wetland buffers: Wetland Area' Class. (per City) Wetland PerimeterT Buffer Area Minimum Buffer Width Average Buffer Provided 1 1 367,654 SF I MANAGE 1 1 1,555 LF 1 94,776 SF 1 24' 60.9' Notes: 1) Full wetland area including portion within proposed right of way dedication. 2) Buffer calculation is provided for wetland perimeter outside of proposed right of way dedication. Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal March 27.2020 Nye Subdivision — Chanhassen, MN Page 3 of 4 r The development site also contains other pond/wetland areas in the west portion of proposed Lot 1, but those areas have been previously covered by drainage and utility easement, which will be maintained. No impact is proposed to any onsite wetland. Tree Preservation The estimated baseline tree canopy coverage for the existing site is 45% of the net area (excluding wetland areas). Per the City code, low density residential is then allowed to remove to a limit of 35% tree canopy Prior to requirement of mitigation. The development plan proposes to maintain tree canopy coverage of 41% and thus a no tree mitigation is required. I_andscauine City ordinance requires provision of 1 tree per lot and these trees will be installed by the future homebuilder and existing home lot owner. The proposed single-family yards to he disturbed by grading will be vegetated with typical residential turf grass and the wetland buffer and disturbed steep slope areas with appropriate seed mixes. TIldING/PHASING If the City approves the preliminary subdivision and final plat request, it is the Applicant's desire to look for an interested homebuilder looking towards possible construction in Summer 2020. CONCLUSION The applicant respectfully concludes that the request for a rezoning and preliminary subdivision approval will allow for a development consistent with City Goals and Objectives for this area. The proposed development will create a single-family subdivision that is consistent with the adjacent land uses, provides preservation of wetlands, improves and extends existing public infrastructure. A Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal March 27 2020 N . e Subdivision — Chanhassen, MN Page 4 of 4 NYE ADDITION rwr.r,.,Wv.�� Ww.,s..,....m.a.......n.....we...Nm..a..aW..aw.m... Mlmanernv+YMaarmmN� W any W.WN.w.�mmwxunM WmYrr�,� W �.m� N [onMiN. �6.ww Ww uxW eNr�elti»ennmwJµrYrxe'maxwpn�mNmmx W repuN W esµrwYx repB.aNe\ev�mrw4iMrnw.mmFmuwayrwrew.N W \rnrr�mmmJne�wm.yr.w.rwamiinrY WeeaMAx mya\Nm va�a�.exirwaµ� ~xsNwn�se�e �.rmHNrvw�W +�i� ��.m�m 1mW MrFYmrvawr Mlmr.nr�wwumLy.usmmN�[nw�ynrrusr.. W x.m.MrrwrFwwruac cvirr.Mmr WW unNW Ni.� mrm ..remFawmvt_�v.. uLxNrNNmWamgecn�rY.mvm�a.r�N Wa_ NN.�..sW.mao.mr... r.wm W Avanr MWa Orurv\amgeO'w�.Y.wxigY�niprwOMN�>a �N�w W W \FanNti OnFeN6eaMw.uwwirVe9Ymf tlyuN tlraowxrm.Mmw x� M i�>NrNewm.F_xW W.w. s..rhaNselnaNWoe.N_Ne a. uwuvmW NN W ewr�rp�N_me� f�a�rtlw�uw WnrmrN n laewrrr. 0 ALLIANT -----------� m.LM>e.,NN 1....... NYE ADDITION } L I — aersazT _ I ji I III I I ' I_a ' IIi ygW�1 I 14 � I I III I I I ' I jl I ------------------ I I : 1 II OUTLOTA I q -- ..,MM I 1 1 1 A.MIR 4D V1IUT'L1edEN16 .R fNOMIIxV9- I' I I—e III 4 III o J—JIL_I_ �o lwln F .u1n me pnF9lele �tllYw uMna alnarFn MC � N apiv tlw. lxE .1I 1.11, 0.CIX1 IN.l� ei4MLV N 1.1[5 P 0 xAv 0 ALLIANT NYE ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA L 7 r 9ffi �'F— WR01A J ° �1h1'l•�� VICuNITY MAP SHEETINDEX NO. COVER SHEET I DETAILS 2.3 EJUSTING CONDITIONS SURVEY I PRELIMINARY PLAT 5 SITE PLAN 6 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN N EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS 9 STREET AND SANITARY PLAN AND PROFILE 10 TREE CANOPY COVERAGE PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN OWNER ANN NYE - TRUSTEE I"163M ST.W CHANHASSEN. MN. 35331 CONTACT: ANN NYE EM. unnnye(u,mm APPLICANT ENGELA VOLKERS Inn MINNETONKA BLVD SURE ID1 DEE.PHAVFN. MN. 55391 PH: 612-695.)1101 CONTACT: WOODY LOVE. ENE wmtlylJwrcdybve<wn CONSULTANT ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC'. 733 MARQUETTE AVENUE. SUITE]IMI MENNEAPOLIS. MN SM 15 PH: 612-T58-3= FK: 612d5A-3M ENGINEER MARK RAUSCH LICENSE. NO. 4MN EM: nwuxM1CuWllem-inc.mm SURVEYOR PETER D. GOERS LICENSE NO. NI10 EM: peamWJlunbmcm,n ALLIANT ... mwa�,oim Arai„a s,n»Tm vop •M�� f � rar e.vc. rx r wiZ { .r _ r� •r.._.w rFrw rmr tn_ar�nr u.vmn me wry n� —G...Y.M131 USIMG W � a.,s,.M a¢A, . .mYY Y. Y o ALLIANT ]]9 MerOUMe AuenW Su fe hp Mrnne17¢ 5500+ 5B ]OBO wx« nllwnr me mn J Q m in 5 a J Q Z_ O LL_ E auum wW..a]<ama rrwxar n.Y o». P, _ 2 ¢r 2 el 12 �Z MEMO YLY79 Su+ C1Xs s SrJ�! cM11 .. k( �w+m eeuves I * � � • +w.wn�t� I _mit�yr_ • q�-ceea 0// suxru. ssxm ssln T WIF Mr< onu PROJECT NAME ! 1 rim mov�wl •vw. vnIM um du�w�u � i�te myll � M�ea vrl- 53� 0 ALLIANT Suu 7<U Mlnnu�s MN S'AM 613 ]SB.9MJ xwn..WrYic.mm 0 E 3 n o t—I — 3 of 12 83RD 77 ,x.. tEOENo o� arne�_ you. oEeallPnoN k NOlEB ram. .....,_,�.. _......, d.,.........��..~.. ppp 'nTMOIMTUL— Mimw00b, MN�Ybt yy"1/V6�`_J)d7",s- /Y B11 ]69 MU ALLIA NT E%ISTNO CONDMONSIBOUNDMY SURVEY OF NYE PROPERTY uu® rxencwn...TA J L — — — — — — — — S 3 R D _ 9lM�1.1(Y LEGEND: Lw[Lr. LK - — LwLYlxt LK --- Law wax alurxr r.M I I M ! STREET p3 PSSgy Y . a,. d,. Mmxtnv+wn ,T. ppy��@@ 1 1 ' 9 rE i I I IA ALLIANT M'1 WpuMeRrMln BUNiW MHILLpaIM, AP16lwJ ��1 Y.11/Jfs] AYrLMmm 2 ox[ Mini E° o� a oun[.awxr k � a BLOCK I I ( OUTLOTA 4 N a I I II II } I I z r, I F Q J wrest weeao me ,e]Tk MATRIUL f Il a ..a-� 7 7 war P` p��E SNP Nil�lly� — N 63RD — STREET j .[u LOT L. n wT I, aan I SITE PLAN DATA:' ""e wlp Y[11 w w.irvru[NIIUN MIDO, 4N N >m so w ..n wl nnvw, .ua w�. meal. ..o1.>:m ,a•.n � . m ram. nm man «w�1. ,o,.x. iemo vMO4O LOT DATA TABLE O,fMHMMMA i • su inw.� ui ,mcu iw w,w I I T — — — [rte,. TMl,an .b ate.., n sna""+a"cwx�,on io [vm ii • 1 — _ —4 _ _ _ J TYPICAL LOT DETAIL r - I ALLIAANT idt MerwM.Awnrio s....m MYrnenpo4e. MN'.Swt ,nwrnlluM nm m BLOCK 1 g OUTLOTA F ;i I I g 6• �MVMq cn n..o1[., 44 LL nsnu rtMfllu. eNYJKi ��y wn,w oa M N y><� Z Q 6 f N +«----••-•• LEGEND: WETLAND SUMMARY — - - — WETLAND BUFFER CALCULATION - --- w, p awo am, .ol.n,,r 6 ,.n. 6012 GRADING NOTES: .: i iu�lr m..m• p Hues. ra r.rs.lo 63RD STREET .'mri6o «.muv DEVELOPER/BUILDER: PaE��M�NP�� 0 ALLIANT �m.,e^,enec"m $u119 ]CO MlnnseVAO. MN SNM ere1 rx Moeoe a GRADING LEGEND: y.or �� 7 I.. 11.11 MRD •LEGEND ©m©©©omoo©o©© .a. Ewa, ..'n"m.�'m, x sa ,..—m a.x.„ L r I I � I I I 1 I v i i L 44 STREET ALLIIAANT r ..."u�Xe Awnw _ N= MN — Minn6111) 7 .55.oe ]5..]O9] uviweM.MJr�c....n BLOCK 1 I; bR �e � _ONO= J J L ` enosax muaa x.r[1 oY ^- DND ^- / ---DND— ,�p,+p�Jy' :sicw xc. norzcnm CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING: uAI n� SWPPP BMP QUANTITIES (PER PLAN so u NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: ,.'"°°>.wcw� x ,. cac.R marl. NM . M nw°vrx. IN, ,� OUTLOT Al �° z CND ^ J TAKDWI 0 _ 7 Z N p J � EROSION CONTROL RE RESPPORSI6LMAMY: IIN. NOTEM�,.,.,.,..... VICINITY MAP a z W J ¢ i z o o LL W N 2 W O O ¢ z t z z i LEGEND: a 4 w = W O DND a m PF $, 8 0[ 12 w' v ycoxsm�cnox T dY® marl¢ awl EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: 1, 4o,...H a `.& M e .{uMiw urµ,, uu. s auao ~lo r Tm"w-m w rtx I. I fIt AL �nn w�a..`: M�. ,�..... IT.—a.o..eCI .. R.w.,.—I .... MCCLLYCU3 CIIW c..a n. EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE: I IT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES �....� FINAL STABILIZATION: I-T IQ 'n1 OI�11ANi_ mwwe�r II rM nx conxa rm rs vox EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: ITT III -II I..—��..w .,... ALL a....«.. o....... v: ITT POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ?QcQvMvNP?T`l r4 ALLIANT M.+nagpnnn, SSfOP flit t59.YN9 S n * w.M....M..wcrM.�.e. xav<r xW wu 2 BLOCK 1 1 1 I 2 I I I BLOCK 1 II II .I II I _ L . lNwxgS WM / \ v[uAH [nSRIE �W �r 10 / / Vlly i[i -•• rs 'V[_/(_'¢^ V� m�Mro MM on Mru. M 1060 _N�``GOO �. 1050 sa.o.l V _ er ua, o mow® a y°r"1 / xv n. �oIIllls� u�LNOTES: lio:o nm LEGEND: __ .n... sw. ran.lnwcm e. <x.wsux loco . a.. .orev-nns w.w uR., rexwx..w u. coxrm<mx rmmx 1020 E. M. `:Ull cam, Ma.s. . fay.ua.n.um .0 1.+✓n.xx.fsse %[wc,ws we r]� Wv.m: 1010 � 0 ALLIANT I YJJ MerpwM1e 4wnire Sux. IW Mlnrwglie. 5 ] Bt]. ]!SB JOBO mM[.rzB Mn.w OUTLOT A iT - —' — -T-TAkbpiR7AAll L J a O — — — — — — k 2 N 2 z wx gniEx unvazP9e'" J a 5 s a a > ® a z r 1.1 s ions, ------------------------------ ...n cB.f.-,s o y z a E g 2 N z a W z p`o 1060 W W S 1050 iN tom low B.W 1010 M.: s 10 m. LEGEND 0 o.,NN �. ,o ,a oREL�M\NP�� CANOPY CALCULATION ALLIANT !. ryuMO.rBnuO SUXO ICO ^9�1 ]yyJB] 11 of 12 ------ - - - - -- J �_-------------- 63RD STREET PLANTING NOTES SEED PLANTING NOTES i LkNDSOAPE REQUIREMENTS LEGEND 0 N ALLIIAANT son. rro re. qNu, MN 55<0]. — ^ BI}]51 I1M0 uwn nNnm-Mc cnm TAKOMA EWL L — p _ c W Q 2 i' au.u.c ss�,..ai<o.mo. NYE ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESO TA PURL 1 - - 0 40 80 160 SCALE IN {gT CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAR 2 y 2020 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT =-NNILD I1� 7 I P 2 / BLOCK T otmorA 1 Jae o � e� I I CM1ristm a � f La _ �.' .� L �c�✓ r,Yae � Lake 9� 9 6c ♦ Pe �k PR A � [ 0 I `• £ e a R^ a n6 O ®w Lake An ` t y " CHANHASSEN a tl •I'Y, 2010 POI R952 Me. i x Yx VICINITY MAP SCALE: t'-20017 SHEET INDEX NO. COVERSHEET 1 DETAILS 2-3 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY 4 PRELIMINARY PLAT 5 SITE PLAN 6 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 7 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 8 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS 9 STREET AND SANITARY PLAN AND PROFILE 10 TREE CANOPY COVERAGE PLAN 11 LANDSCAPEPLAN 12 ti REVIEW o"�P5( OWNER ANN NYE-TRUSTEE 1641 63RD ST. W CHANHASSEN, MN. 55331 CONTACT: ANN NYE EM: annnye@q.com APPLICANT ENGEL & VOLKERS 18202 MINNETONKA BLVD SUITE 100 DEEPHAVEN, MN. 55391 PH: 612-695-3001 CONTACT: WOODY LOVE EM: woodyQwoodylow.cota CONSULTANT ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 733 MARQUETTE AVENUE SUITE 700 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 PH: 612-758-3080 FX: 612-758-3099 LICENSE NO. 43480 EM: t uwh@allimt-inc.com SURVEYOR PETER D. GOERS LICENSE NO. 44110 EM: pgoers@alliam-inc.com ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant4nc.com J I_ m 5 a J Z z o LL z } 0 W Q O w Z N o Q i ] W o > a ¢ Z a U I N—n , nreh mat mi. 'Ian. ,i/Imxon, — '"'I e � P-,,meJ by me mar my ei,.n .uP•r`blrnam mat I u dulyLb.n.w PROfEsRONAL EN6MEER under m. — o1 IN.N . SM1 .1 MIN NEWEN .. MVS PE QUALITY ASSURANCE/CDRIROL P. DATE PROJECT TEAa DATA DESIGNED: MEN DE.WN: El PROJECT NO: 2111 i I seEn 1 of 12 Vwm ]1.9.30 ® VLVT 3149.M xorzs vl- x..a, • 9St agge9e 3 v�N )�9 ID 9aYv ,W'i . m�.vt am� a b.wu � enm, vim. ,w.•me ,.Y.t9m .n IM" I PIPE BEDDING Saw FOR P.V.C. PIPE e+-IOUNNc OEPWe11ENT 2203 V.Rr,wl I F - IAonYw a hs wzts�- r _ F 45 KOR BE`U a Pac wn-as Px wx aws Vr tsx rm+ —�tn aas a.rRh. vw TS .1 .,IT snnam sEEn s . Is xm /6ctr.En o . aex swwcc i' - we romws... T .1 ee xswi n, mx.`x'�LA P..,mr _ Pxo.TL PxreL.:. �. " f h (JIN3-x�x'.E➢ Pv AuanM BEVl6 (AMJ-I) A mYJE , " T9AQA R 4KiV RP YE:'S - LETY IUIF ebl. ra ww. M swsQ uv E CM Or TYPICAL SANITARY SEWER cEvV-E O�SEI 'LESS J'1 D1 a .Ee'e•,. mw ai l l I zos e- 3Ktl, ssly —'- A wNx . s.a sx.J.ac r-wmr rnoUL w.Hw ro9 r.n - zm s.,.e.,m. sows. a.e r-wmm zJw vtr�nc Not to scale tnTrc x E T w.9. o.ysx .tea rK 6 n Me V®o lY 'nyz�e, a msaw� m. .w,.<Pw. e.arx RESIDENTIAL 99ww� REEIT SECTION STREET SECTION E4GNEEr+IxG OF➢/JI1YElJr am e- 5200 /S� �CTFj 7�QN yNEW �r �0.��n• ��a.sr+�TWYw 99ww STANDARD 9E1Ef SANITARY MANHOLE 0tG91FIIbxL aE,miili r1r m, 2101 I I r• tn.� tw wL�w.. x,t.la �� ti a- ,.,00r aeTe 7. &WTnn V.uld 3 +nMr seta m..oro ma an. 1z' e' ur .iu t. wn...e. P@ os:,9 sa.. x.do�. IN 12 IV J r 4.4 �J `�. �9eoR�u On TYPICAL CURB AND GUTTER Rsxs: to-Te �� OEP/JlTYENT 5203 lr wL EM W Bafd%x REOJ44 W '�-Y 9r 4Z R�TN SStMmr,MES Olv +�wR. 31 MJ�MXCSe e' ma vdrvhrt lr E�^R tart: z-•RE mw wzu Rxa Nh xm u+uxm. wr. ENL mass Nu ETu � E RF oli"'o ] 1D SXNL t r VYEfi 1 ! w,LtlwS 9.a yy��TMES a E«R Er,m, Rr,t2gWLGt .C1R1xIC AIMS iwfNI ]r �s wr lr � mL]RR � CFr.a Stm wT. use oR wxa+ mR¢ .nL ssT.x tom. eE�. r m ¢rz .o.sra r�uz swa E emen W w t/• m +n- 2 KPF]MMO F➢n I➢1I51NE MMGS 9ULL E pSiµLLD eM YNY.iACPv14.$ SE.WJx w( MRp+EO EINK /al IOISrs s 1 K D tEl RNL] IROY 1. m m4 . mm wwrs Nor Pewerrzo ro E xsro w wJlstwc aws. ] E41 CQFY Sx4L VY SRFt 4WS1M6 eNG MSEAh LQ MANHOLE CASTING AND ADJUSTING DETAIL ENCINEERINc oEVN+rmlr "'Etc 2110 46 I Iuw,rY.nrna ewro � rwt un u 1 E.n I I e NOBS ue, ww u we.. Two ew-•9,x.�E �.,® k Ro..T. 9 xMYT.4 b SRTO eC iE mE-JK ® TYPICAL IEMP- CUL-DE-SAC [r�u +-mhIG OFPIR11ENr x'E ¢ 5205B a a,K �",tLrtu ..®x..T ..m MANHOLE CASTINGS AND LIDS DETAIL ENCINmuNc oEPNeuEHr "'` ` 2111 MO mVF2 ON a Qlr1ET e etroA a cJ_Tu �RESIDENIIAL LTITOF BI UNINOUS DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES a (DiVAR 4Yp 1WWWT CURBS -L 1 1` 52C9 PRELM051PR C7 Ab ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 I W v.alliant-Inc.com J a F- co m !n g a J Q Z LL R Q Z_ CO LU CC o c . ca��a ervm amr c<.l P.'E1S*NlL El m. '.. A m. Nwx[sou YYh x.Y]Cx. P[ WI. •�p.�I'lwrw lit. �ry .,�.COWROL pE9p@ NM p9Am U.J. PROJECT R 21w-000 2 SHEET 2 of 12 on enuccT xo. Cry M CNANxI55Ex .e..mr r ®mow wb.w .� 1— SINE „x..n Meumb •n_ S., pn bony I.n ue _ abe u„ ... mrl bs 4an Sw. YYn b O__ �Np16a1. F b Sn,be by be o pM .Sa aM ul S.Mn Vps��_ 1 pL lM1,yx goy. m F..1) x - . xH. xewrw Db,..v_ Am eenIm em . z n Ymlri W Sm . I xvn Cweba,r .Ieugx—._ In. a ,..NN, v...b TTp. a ].... Oopq al pl (FnI, ynbu b ON Aap be!) P✓ eeeee an. y ua � ,ar.wM�x.a suu Or STANDARD SERVICE TIE CARD EWINURINC OEPMIYEM hwrt r. 5 221 d'f'be Tme i �t WATER SERVICE HEY TRACER ORE DETAIL rur ExOMEEIA+G DEPAPIMEHT �" 5504 w. I. O.M. nm Iu0 TRUI DETAIL eoTroM a PIc pNNR{E PERppU1ED A: —wTHaT soa PIPE BETA& L CUA i t•Elacz x 3Tr1CngC .m ...Tu, ,o EFAWGIOq tll R4 .Mn"o' l Ara 4tH9H�C r ,t x1t«Y 9tlE Rr N111! S ILL P1N1RL ,O wk p 4• DAI T�ACE &E - _: OEPARTMFNT NA1E N!: 52]3 J— SANTRACER ITARY NCR RDEAIL .se w PIGHONIHO DEPIKII ' 5506 �� a• ,n'.e• ra..n.e enm xw '-°• � .a, cn crow E G, fnunrY m prb Co�O- . > l.C. �b.nem bmx rm xn— -.A F ti nabmmm .warabx m b wb.mrb a ran sv......w.. s,.neea He 1. pn. m b,+ma b ral..x. +r.+xc b mrm seer ru a ir.r ..xrpbm o.ma n wa. a vnr. pm. »..M] m wa.T — a,], b...e A • —^^ rn n .mT. enx .nne,roN To bAI 4r- SJ, 9VF.1 mA' b M ulm M aw..0 .iP r.ha.,v m 6q. Wry tr brluN .x.! be RoeM 10'-0• Kerr N al bTmvmeae n .. mrnc-: m0.un.M m bmPq.bbl.y b� ,.n. �to bea,ybr...A d. Ifr.rvXe .mow'. r iI 1ryrmall�Nrrnn. �F�d�10EPpEw TYPICAL 1� BARRICAR ENCANUTHNG OEPMndENi IMOF SANITARY SEWER SERVICE F� LINE TRACER WIRE DETAIL ._ NEERNc DLPAR]lpr rr" r' 5507 E% +�ha i M yee rob. wn1M T ,enemy.. Ux b.,Yn SWf11NG SN) � RP ti . dy m .orRua Wd. Ton FITYOF 5303 9 :-- `S Yr gcT,v. MEx IVL` ysnPry.N�i M F x.. �r.pm �..r s'n�• rue. it Inry WEER SANITARY MANHOLE TRACER ORE DETAIL FNI]HEE--Wni ~tW 5506 8' PROJECT NAME .R CT DESCUP➢ -A 54 LOT 91 FNILLY RE91ENTML S9GN9W DExE1aPER- r%L F CONTACT- xAl£ "ab" Raises, PERwTTED mNSTwkllax 1101IR5-MEN.-M. 6' JNI-6W SANRDAY 9AM-. ABSXU7EL1111 x0 CDHS R RIXI ACTMIY. MANTENAxCE OR DEL.FNIES NLON£O ON SITE WTSCE W THESE HWRS on 6 aux+Asvl INOE9MC uruT.ern wz-so-nw wn 1. 9a Slue HALE A mum a TMO P05TS 2. NSTN1 SO4 AT ALL CMSTMICTON ENIRIHCES. x 9CV1 9u11 luTf 'NTE DACITIXPMO w1H UAIX LETIEFRG 4. UTTER 9II TO Flt 6 Y 6' SIGN. CNN DEVELOPMENT INFO SIGN - E]GIFIIOR: RPM]IaNf 6 FOR OWC 0 �N GT1CN A& ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.wrn J F- 2 m N F- 5 a J r 0 LL z w 0 2 w z Q < J Q } < 2 W z a o I n...ny o.rHly mN m;. o a., .p.cilicoNan, w nporl e'va pnpo..tl by me or under my Cinel upwmlon —4 Mal l auly INtl .ne. pf.551O.AL DIGHWEx une.. ppo Me law of IM Smm al MINNESOTA WRt xAIISM. K Oem D No OOAUTT A458RMICE/COIIIROL @SORB MINI DIUMN: ELL IIIOIFCr III 21h 3 9X¢T 3 of 12 J 63RD SBa°2fri 399.89 ®.®X se 1p/D y I Z w 1 I as is f LEGEND ® N E am ew ec —.—a— ans Tkirnsm a m as (� nasseaddeast ee is — 8 LL N 2 ., ., xs s xaadi xes— xaman, m %STREET 1 �j88°2636E � -W ease R J xmav ieu.9X Xpll _L _ ✓in.xX Xiaui. xwa.ie si $ wv x ? x ox 7 a. ansaa xeiss e 8 sx wx' v, xrWiao ?x d sovas ass— w x wv m 'X Xiweei XwYs] v 2 x xs t .1-1 x XrW x%raaa W2mv •aids. mr 'e,", m NaB`2G "W4o9 note 'mass e�.. x - Xrae..es wn--?w.vxs --.— �`,��ro sales,xat.—` ed � o..n xan _. Xa,w 4 >, xroam . x x x aads— 09''7c Xea,..ix .ax ae xmr.e: x,mdu X m �daR q�ic.3e� lw xw>. eaa11 Yw�st X1.111, %exim x�w xwwn k n 4� x . at x. x n.aa. % Xeres. aidese", m.. 7 X > si as Xrmie. % im x xieum x x xm>.• roam a % X x s * x ww. xwx.. eas"ouv Xrofw xm_ xravnst xia.ess xaz.m u si x main% NBX2635-W Im.W -- --s ximxn Is xem x e,.nx x xa..z. Ajw«21 eenx x I` x l at LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 p3. Read, 1, —,sas ENsi Cmvc County, MinreWa no512tl P tp NOTES 1. m5 Banal eno and wopwly eadwpwn Brown Irere�n ree Dasee apc^ ^1wn®tear 1s.1e m Ina Po Fo—, lmrreammlmeceCoo, Qdr, mpryno .66b1 /waeasedmewo JkannavryMel oas ®.94eMQtl RryuElc n,:.. x mesedeadu of ndencIso. u0l .d'.ttllutM on lMwma4dnfipn Dorded sore. eallsv. -eavEah Sarver lcale'me nro 4onwn pTvp�6Y•mmdreRn Wevalhol niWd. pmWeeop o lamr6[ ant Rep calms wont' na W eun VerXy N Wabs uRul mmsmstim wCesyn. 3. Tnp a -do Bed o1 N5 ase, leddre. a. on me Garin County odo irele sysMn-83 I's"II a. urdroandeaiae'on. S mz min ed. a.. doesenneed pgeny' ii... sonse IM 6aNecres. 6. Reni Me* 1'.MDOi moi 2736 D. in rsedised,06 ndi east ab9 Trunk Nei 7 hom ll,elu noon of T 1k Hghony 01 andT Hghly 7 israids HgMvey7 MIdWilt 1 62. 6. e] O bel noMwesl of a pewG rele, F4.01 IsouM 1 dadbonlilTunk den, 7. 51 0 insist naMnesl of ..In laF. is. l..1 no. olawNess as, .1nd an e¢'mm d.2 11. NG D. 11Mva 2: Top it l d salad dreaded on lire ses.sale it woos Duds lAM, Soul1. of Me oWAPsao 'as an elevdes, of 1tt3d.51 road N(ai xn anent X." o .>.>Si KK Irvs x X M* Xmia. \im -ea {X'"lj'r'— TAKOMA - .-' w«>s au > \is asna!:�—tsd— TRAIL xeuvl mw. xeaa x>`xa»-ss #rm.v eve xx,-11 w—:a # xx—.e . asss - a a...+m..rri xesw, x dnm hgs I rm..>aon,w xmva. a �e�v' �:� I� rotih �M mlSep.pn oxwt ptyumEfq Ir,n.nn� /� x,o y 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700 Minneapolis. MN 55402612.758.30B0 Sawa so„ana ss io— aeuhucemeetma arvanrenae.urolal..amemreaM-. wvn I't¢R Dp. Fax 9C�ostsNT612,758.3099 pr iJll REVIEW sglennaMamma rLL G CONDITIONS/BOUNDARY DIuwN Br MDT OF NYE PROPERTY 02060DA-lssum63RD STREET BCAL®, MINNESOTA oa o maam 0 Itl O IN IN da Z I I N 63RD seezearE 3es.ev STREET — seH'zcas� foo.00__ o zo aD eo _ _- -- -- �_ -,n,,,Rs, __-� ��* _ ne .dT..En _ a rm,1.6,0,� -" o / - .ens A. — SCALE IN FEET TA LE-1 E5—E5 \`\ o W m 1 h n W 1 � N eur / 2 xs s ED i \\ «` .ffi---_____ o,E.y.,.,—E, Nse'zcasW zss.n - AND I 1 IASENE. PER ALAI Or ILDNA.0 w1.Nz m ORNNAGE AND NBWY]9"E 59 �1' I I 1 \ I UTILITY EASEMENT 1 1 1 I \ 1 \ I I 01 A, TATS-"' E DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT - W OYER ALL OF OUTLOT A n H / \_ — — --- 1 / ,1 C BLOCK 1 I I / 2 OUTLOT A e _ - ---Ae " ---------- I - 19.2' , •� m «� �, ; d�. E.g�l un Doc .o .xro 1 I - � M.dwu [sd1ES I �� 15�59'�x'1 ��lS' d'350.Wi _ _ TAKOMA TRAIL oJG( `0' V I l \ I LEGEND PROPERTY LINE MUR.'�.voMnRys\sro0s,a�M10P/NTIR® LOT LINE 5-•i - - R.O.W ' ---- ---- EASEMENT LINE �e • FOUND IRON MONUMENT I I NOTrorue 9rdnrd.a,.le.mlAyudm.a lard roe a.ey do un eeau..r dtrsemeepa PMDBARFATABEE PARCEL N SF MFAAO 9111 221,39D 5.05 111{ De,1se 0.0 OUTLOTA 15.951 03T ROW 5.wl 0.12 TOTAL 2ma09 8,10 FoaP\M\NPRy ` N PEEo�CO3 6 ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliantJnc.wm FJ F M m f� g a J a F z a Q a LL a z O_ DIE cc ~ a ;zz z °o W a Q J J t a M ccz ED a a I bvaby E.01tyy Iba1 My Plan SPec llcatlen, r nP.d ... ProparM by me o 90 my afree Pm ba... oM One I a e„ry u.«1.w 'ROFE551DNLL ENGINEER order M. ee 1 IvM. 5w. 1 MINNESOTA Mud R/.USM, rt Do. Ilnlu. Nc. OUAIITT ASSURANCE/CONTROL 6` DATE DATE ISSUE a-2J-2�mu T PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DFEI LL PRDJELT ND: 219-.M 5 SNEr, 5 of 12 63RD REM LOT LINE OF LOT 1. BLOCI(1 I 1 \ / \ 1 1 1 I \ iI 1 \•, I I I � SITE PLAN DATA GROSS AREA 6.403 ACRES WETLAND OUROT A 0.336 ACRES DGSTNG ORAINAGE/UFUFY EASEMENT (I-OT 1) 3.472 ACRES ROW DEDICATOR 0.123 ACRES NET DEVELOPABLE AREA 2.472 ACRES PROPOSED D NG UNITS 2 NET DENSITY GalUNITS/NET ACRE EMSLNG WED USE RESroENTLLL LOW DENSITY PROPOSED LAND USE !RESIDENTIAL LAW DENSITY EGSUNG ZONING RSP - SINGLE FAMILY RFSIDENRAL DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING RSF - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT DATA TABLE 6S K W MINIMUM PAD BLOC LOT AREA (SF) SETBACKS ' FRONT REM 1 1 1 221.390 30 1 30 1 1 2 1 36,196 30 1 30 ' SIDE SETBACKS, SEE TYPICAL LOT DETAIL A — — / -- M'R TEMP CUL-DE-SAC SEE CITY PLATE 52058 (DESIM MODIFIED TO BE OFFSET) REMOVE EXISTING R= PAVEMENT AS REWIRED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION d r-------- -=--I I r%M fh\MI! SERI41{ TIME 16 F _ RaL M.aMD+r I 1 L-mR PAO CAL. I RSIF ZONING STANDARDS: I I I I I L I � I b v 4is�ul isE I 61 1 L----------J REWIRED MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK 90 FT (ML-DE-SAC LOTS) REQUIRED MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT RIGHT OF WAY GO R (STM6ARD LOTS) MINIMUM LOT AREA 15,DW SF LEGEND N STREET x 0 20 40 80 -_ —t T-- — -- — SCALE IN FEET I EXISTING HOME AND DRIVEWAY TO REMAIN WITH DRIVEWAY AND UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS M 63RD ST W ,+ BLOCK 1 � II I I I I` �I I I I y( -_ . HOUSE PAD /IF` _-2X•: DENNEATED WE UND / OUTLOT A ROW DEDICATOR - —•,�—Ti�C1�°�fvll 4 NNRE ROAD "A A11N61IENT �'L INSTALL TEMPORARY BAWIGADES CUMW/UINU WETTER F�R.a\M\c1PRv \oRcpNs'cR��T10N MAINTAIN DRIVEWAY ACCESS T TO MISTING HOME DURING CONTRUCTIDN - - - - - - - -- EASEMENT UNE - — - BUILDING SETBACK PROPERTY LINE LOT NNE ---- RON EXISTNG OVERHEAD UPU Y NGSTNG FIBER OPnc E%6NNG GAS EXISTING SAINFARY SEWER IXISTING WATERNNN —_�— PROPOSED seNTmw SEWER - — — - WETLAND SETBACK WEnAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER MORIINENT WETLAND SUMMARY WETLMQ CRY CLASS. MCWD CUSS. AREA I MANAGE 2 MANAGE 2 19,799 SE (0.455 AL) WETLAND BUFFER CALCULATION cc MU RIJFIFFRING ROIRMNT5' THE CITY OF CNWHA4EN AND MINNEVNN C!✓EEl< WATERSHED D 1 HAVE BUF BEOUIREMENR PER W 13 ....... .r ...— .-..w G RN I. WDH THE MOST SIMGT cUIDMNE FouDWFD: T •-, GneamtT:d CnrdCbaduem \Gsmhafiwt R"asand �_... R"etlad Chl+F aav H6r SmP Rqumm zlmPIIllrxlm SNbaheHa6r Aacan.'Srpeme SednkoH�Z R'WMN CMFe�alm .mpBaM BICO R-Mm gded,2oS-A.. sbpg3 IV.SeNd• RzytedOC. A,.Tsbpt SIAc,+GEZ :C DC I I NV2NAGE2 1 30e '36xbL C.a.kR'mted hSc[a8yc. a: baub�cElEvMvaoaSx a+ay'A+ds++--- u w�{z baSrJrye Somme'. '44quAd NSr aea� 1C. mkM � .�m+A� E:mbcSvwbe+zdmd ed _(3C -:': =1J ) ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 WwW.alliant-inc.com J r m U) 5 a J z z Q LL o Z w \ O Cc el O W Z Z O N J } G C F z (L in I hereby a++lity Thal IhIs Plon, x�ll<aNen, er neon Wm pnpaM by mr a do my mrea P•W.- and IW I a duly 1—sed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER undo Me MMe al Me Sbb .1 MINNESOTA YY[ R.U501, PE DUALITY ASSURANCE/coNnm BY DATE DATE ISSUE 3-3)- q1Y 511iO3TK I PROJECT TEAM DATA DCSIGVEp; MaR DR1WX: ELL PROJECT NO: $19-0003 r� U TYPICAL LOT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE I N.V7 6 of 12 R, GRADING NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO WE SURE THAT All REWIRED PERMITS AND MPROYALS HAVE BEEN OBTANED. NO CONLSTRUCNN OR FABIRCATKRN SFALI. BEGIN OWL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED By ALL OF THE PERMOTING MJTIORRIES. 2. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHAL SLOPE AWAY FROM PROPDeM BUILDINGS AT YINIYON GRADE OF 2DL ALL SWMFS SHALL. HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2.Ni. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE ADJACENT ROADWAYS FREE OF DEBRIS AND PREVENT ME OFT -SERE TRACKING OF SOIL IN ACCORDANCE WAIN ME REQUIREMENT OF TIE CITY AND WATERSHED. 4. NOTRY GOPHER STATE ONE fill, AT (ITN) 252-11 M. M HOURS PRIOR TO BTMTT OF C0XSDKIC11pN. 5. A11 IMPROVEMENTS TO CONFORM WTIH CITY OF CHANWSSEN CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS SPECIFICATION, LATEST EIXIION. 6. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SLAL BE PROVIDED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION ACCESS POINT. 7. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER MR SOIL CORRECTION REQUIREMENT AND TESTING REOUIREMENTS. 63RD B. STRIP TOPSOIL IN AJL NSURBED AREAS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTON. REUSE STOCKPILE ON SITE STOCKPILE PFHIMETEtS MUST BE PROTECTED "'TM SET PENCE 9. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING GRADING OF (3:1 OR GREATER) SIDE SLOPES AND MANAGE SWALES. WOOD FIBER BLANKET OR OTHER APPROa'ID SOIL STABILIZING METHOD (APPROVED BY ENGINEER) SH U- BE APPLIED MR APPROVED SFID MIXTURE AND A MINIMUM OF 4' TOPSOIL 1G. TIE GENERAL CONRACTOR MUST DISCUSS DEWAIERING PLANS WITH All SUBCONTRACTORS TO VERIFY REQUIREMENT. IF DEWATERING 6 REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHOULD CONSULT YIRH EROSION CONTINUE. INSPECTOR AND ENGINEER TO DETERMINE APPROPRIATE METHOD. -- - -- — ry STRFFT DEVELOPER/BUILDER: TED F�RR\(e ((\CO08 P[� j � C�NgZPV 0 20 40 80 SCALE IN FEET E0FtIO2C.4 `IXISTNG WETLAND OVERLAND 0UT11T GRADING LEGEND: EXISTING CONTOUR —789 PROPOSED COHTWR PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION K DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE W WALK OUT EASEMENT UNE PROPERTY LANE SETBACK LINE LOT LINE — RIGHT-OF-WAY y EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ROUTING ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliam-inc.com JFF F Z V g F a 3 W IL a J Z a Z_ a a CC o LL 0 Z w } O O Q z¢ O w z > a CC m z u a 0 n...er c.nNr mN m1a Plan. ,P.arManon. a ..Pan w M m unarm aP.N,O,.n one - .mm MY ,l-p.LI M. a_10N.L ENGINEERunJ.. M. law. al m. Slaf. at MINXESOTA MIJIX R.VXN. PE 9m. u-n.. xe. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY OAR DATE ISSUE m PROJECT TEAM DATA RCSIGxro: LIRE OMwx: ELL PROJECT NO: 21ll-0083 7 sEDET 7 of 12 N 63RD _- ---------------- __ I � I c I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I R 1 I 1 1 1 , I , IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIx w r SED NERT BARRIERS I. SILT FENCE (AFOOT 3896) TflP 11611 SEfl] MIX I. MFDOT-IW STymr 17A_TKN Bull I. STRAW/HAY 2. CURB LOG (OATS 20-120 DAY STABILIDATIA) Mn00T TYPE I MLLCH 3. RCIX WEEPER 2. MrDOT-150 1-2 YEAR STPBIUL.TON L EROSION BNKET YnpOT CAC. AT. 3LA MLE�E GEIRGES PERMANENT SEED WIDEN AN ITUBE) }. HTDROMLLaI 1. (MFDOT TYPE A C) L YODOT 270 (RESDENTAL TOE) MnF TYPE 5 2. NFRA K STAY DRNN/CLLVERT 2 SW l TIRE REINFORCEMENT 3. Bar S M SACK (NEAT TYPE A) ORTHRI AMAT E0 NORTH N (REEL DANDY ♦. DµOY BAG (AFOOT TYPE B) OR OT CAT OR EQUAL-MNDOT CAT 6 At�NGt SSNRLLn-TRu LL I. 2- SH CRUED CLEAR ROCK (LAND DEVELOPMENT) STREET EROSION CONTROL -. — 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET , ^-DND— Ilk---DND--- %NOTE: INSTALL INLET PROTECTION ON DOWNSTREAM INLETS CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING 1- WSTAU- STAB RED CONSTRUCTOR ENRIANCFS. L PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING µ0 STORAGE AREA a NSTALL THE PRE -GRADING SILT FENCES µ0 BUT PROMOTION BMI ON THE SITE, /. CONSTRUCT All PRE -GRADING EROSION AND SEDIMPITATCN CONFR0. BRI S a]IHETE MASS GRADING µ0 INSTAll TEMPMARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING AND PLANING. 8. CONSTRUCT ROST-GtADWG SILT FENCE ON THE 91E STREET & UTILITY PHASE 1. NSTALL BRUTES ONOEIMORMS, STORM SEYfftz GUR IS µD GUTTERS 2 NSTALL MR BAP AROUND W DURV STRUCNRES 3. INSTALL INLET PROTECIIW AROUND Al STORM SEMFR STRUCTURES t. PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING. B. PAL£ 91E a INSTALL rNET PROTECTION OEMLCS 7. INSTALL POST STREET AND UTWtt SILT FENCE 8. REMGYE NL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES (GILT 8 SITE 5 sTABLI7FD), IF REWIRED BY THE CONTRACT SWPPP BMP QUANTITIES (PER PLAN): 1. STANDARD SLT FENCE 353 lF z INLET PROTECTION 2 EA 3. DISTURBED GRADING AREA 0.59 AC 3. TOPSOIL RESPREAD AREA TBD AC 5. TOPSOIL RE5PREAD VOLUME (6- THICKNESS) Me CY 6. EROSION CONTROL BLANIqET 196 SY NOTE TO CONTRA OR CT Ld1�ASH THE MASS (NIADING Is RESPWSNIE FOR INSTALLATION OF ALL ER AM L TRIETERUCK WITH AT DONE HN P gBSEIT CLWT EST MANAGEMENT CE5 (AMPS) µ SHOW IN THE RNO NIE4AYE BEST YAPT HOOTRUCK BY TRUCK WITH A MOBILE WASHOUT BY B OVI ,y GR D AFT TGI MAR GRADING SNPPP E ppST FOR AITE NEEDED MER UTILITY CLAN. SYSTEM PROVIDED µ0 Tm IF E M LIPsHovN IN ME AcnN E B s ARE TaIwuuu As PLAN. ME TO MINI ACTIVITY). BE lAT A Y INSTALLED RACTO BY THE CONCRETE CONTRACTOR. CaDInORT ARISE BYP i0 PREYE:i 91E SEp— MASS GRATON RESPCH961E FOR NL RESPONSIBLE NECESSARY. CONTRA LE MAY BE NECERART. 1NE MASS GTE BNMSSa0U AND U R]PGRMY IRm i0 CE. IE IRE PASS DWO Al µ0 9 SO, TAN UTILITY O ION ONTO STABIUUTW NECESSARY TO RE SITE OR SMUT PREPARE SITE FOR YOr µD USATIS CCTORY 9 HOME eUR➢IN, Ai ME PAR GRADING NUG1 AND SATISFACTORY SITE SaL STAB OPER AND AS NGCO IOF ME DE GUTNG SHALL COCONTRAC µO E STREET A TRANSFER OF NPpES PERMIT RESpaRgBIU11E5 RI ME STREET AND UTILITY CONTRACTOR µ0 TRANSFER PERMIT SMIL OR MF Ott. ME SMUT AND Unutt CONTRACTOR .0 Ott MU THEN ASSUME ME RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ANY IH-RARZ BMPs AS WEIL AS NSTN1 THE MOTIONAL BPPS REAIRET IN THE STREET AND UrILI, CMSTNCTCN DOCUMENT SYPPP. IWA CDYHFRM OF STREET AND UNITE CONSTRUCTOR, THE STREET AND UTUTY CONTRACTOR SHALL REI My AMPS INSTALLED DURING THE STREET ND UNITY PHASE THAT ARE NO LONGER REWIRED AND COORDINATE THE TRANSFER CE HEROES PERMIT RESPONSBIUTES BACK TO ME MVELWpR OR TERMINATE THE PORTION CV THE NPOES PERMIT TRANSFERRED TO ME Cltt µ0 MEW GraMCT,, EROSION CONTROL RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Tee NOTES: 1. EROSION CONTROL PLAIN (SWEEP) INCLUDES PRWATE UTUO' NSTA1lAlDN WORK. 2. SEE SHEET 8FOR ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS. VICINITY MAP NOT M SLNE t LEGEND EumxG CPYfouR 7e9 PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED RETUNING WAIL DIRECTOR OF DRAINAGE •. RROBBSED SWRNr! SEMEN FMW04O AMEMENF PROVER, UNE - - SEGMI LINE LOT LINE - - EEGRbE-MAT PIE � BE PROPOSED SU FENCE (PRE BEN INS) DND GU NOT DFI AREAS AN DRNNOGE ROBIHK DLRIXD YA4 PRI➢II CLANG EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 10 t�t'll' CQNcSRV�SI�N pITFaR ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 wwv,alliant-inc.com z J J a J cc m I- z (n o H U g z z a w J Z a w o LL (n Z _U } ❑ O z ¢ Z¢ ❑ w Z Z ❑ y O ¢ In w w O )N.i CC 2 z U a w I M1.rvEy c.rtily II,N Mis plan. n...Pnrt . pr.<:rmmlFF, .pur.tl In m. untl.� mr e n.n nine nna mm du.. ly 11=.ne u duly PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER untiv It. M. srm..r xINNESOTA[sOTA YUN RAusa, BE Gm. umF.. xe. OUAI)n ASSURANCE/CONTROL B. DATE ISSUE 3-37-SOICItt SVBMRiAL PROJECT TEAM DATA OTSIG.vEO: Mm ORA.B OIL PROJECT ND: 318-0010 19E[T 8 of 12 .,.. W.«,�9a«i„E SI1fFOri'1, n 9L, FLwS. K,v, Wl. m"d OWxE MALE. IccASsoAME6� T1 NASA[ S n.0 'LCLArKN OF SAT FENCE MITof _ l msletxn 1r,f Vol wmTL �I qVlLRp�oLWp SILT yry�yE FENCE 'PWc\v.".axn EI. 'REERNG DEPARTMENT A0- 5300 EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES 1- -3' OEAV O1U9'm aMe INfi' 9.BWt Dene Mo AUG, I QnoKMTDFPM FOR WM1WBS �� 1N- MINIMUM aT cxr cOML1 101OCYS TKiF FROM 92 1rt0 Srtf�YV00 M�(A�A1 N �w- aCGx� �f ROCK ���EEROR CONSTRUCTION EOe�R ENTRANCE ENGWEERNG DEPARTMENT p 5301 1. NO LAND DISTURBING KRMIY SHALL OCCUR UNTIL A GRADING PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED ROM TIE Clry OF CWWHMSEN AND TIE WATERSHED DISTRICT. 2. REST MNYGEMENT uP' R T fl PATER U IT S RBA O EROSION AND SEGMENT CONTROL ION SITE EROSION IN ME MPG CONTROL PL WATER QUALITY IN URBAN AiF/5 AND THE MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION SITE EROSYJH AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING PNIOPoOK. 3. ALL BMP'S SELECTED SHALL BE APMWRMTE FOR ME PME OF YEAR, SITE COTS IIIONS. AND ESTMATW DURATION OF USE A ALL MINK AND MATERA S SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS. ANY DEVIATION FROM ME APPROWD PLANS SHALL REWIRE WROIEN APPROVAL FROM ME ENgNOM OF RECORD, S. A COPY OF THESE PLANS MAST BE M ME JOB STE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PRWAFSS. 6. THE BOUNDARIES OF ME LAND OISNRGANCE EMITS SHD'MN ON THE PLANS SHAH BE CLEARLY FLAGGED W ME FEW PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NO DISTURBANCE BEYOND ME DISTURBED U CMS. Z. WHEREVER POSSIBLE. PRESERVE ME EXISTING TREES CRASS AND OILER WGUATM COVER TO HELP FILTER RUNOFF. B. ESTAIMS4 A PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER ON NL EXPOSED SILS WHERE LAND IS COMM OUT OF AGRICULNML PR.:pUCRW. PLANT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH SENSE GRASS FILTER FROM TO CONSTRUCTION AND TO MINIMIZE WEED GBOA'IH. 9. NL TREES NOT USTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED. DO NOT OPERATE EOIM PMEVOTHIN ME DRIPLINE, ROOT ZONES OR WITHIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE AREAS. 10. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FMIMES (BMP'S) SHALL BE WSTAU-M AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO UND DISTURBANCE ACTMTIES AND THEY SHALL BE SATISFACTORILY EWMNNED UNTIL CONSTRUCTOR 6 COMPLETED ANY ME POTENTIAL FOR EROSION NM PASSED. 11. SILT PENCE IS REQUIRED AT DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER OF DISTURBED AREAS AND STOCKPIl1S. PROTECT WERANDS. WATERCOURSES AND ADIAGENT PROPERTIES FROM SEDIMENTATION AND STORNAVATER RUNOF. 12. ME BMP'S SHOWN W ME PLANS ARE ME MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND UNEXPECTED DR SEASONAL COMMONS OFMATE. ME PERMIIEE/CONTRACTOR SHALL ANTICIPATE THAT MORE BMPS WILL BE NECESSARY TO ENSURE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ON ME SITE. DURING ME CWRSE OF CORSORIRION, IT IS ME RESPONSIBRURY OF ME PERAMW/CONDUCTOR TO ADDR6S ANY NEW CONDITKKiS MAT MAY BE CREATED BY CONSTRUCTION MIMIES AND/OR CUMANC EXTENDS AND TO PRPADE ADDITIONAL BUT O`ER AND ABOh ME MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SKYA'N ON ME PLANS. AS MAY BE NEEDED TO PROVIDE EFFECINE PROTECTON OF WATER AND SOIL RESWRCES 13. ME BMP'S SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY ME PERMTTEE/CONTRACTOR AND MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED FUNCTIONING, SILT FENCES CLEWED OR REPLACED AT SEDIMENT BUILDUP OF 1/3 OF ME PENCE HEIGM. 14. FUND DISTURBING ACTMRES SHALL OCCUR IN INCREMENTS OF WORKABLE SIZE SUCH MAT ADEQUATE BW CONTROL CAN BE PRAIDED THROUGHOUT ALL PLEASES OF CONSTRUCTION. ME SMALLEST PRACIIOL AREA SIA1L BE USOSE➢ OR OTHERN5E DHOCU i8E0 AT ANY ONE THE 15. OPERATE TRACK EQUIPMENT (DOZER) UP AND DOWN EXPOSED SOIL SLOPES W FNN_ PA4, LEANNC TRACK SECURES PERPENDIWUR TO ME SLOPE DO NOT RSK-RIME LIME A SURFACE ROUGH TO MINIMIZE EROSION, 16. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE StABIUZED FROM EROSION WTHIN 7 DAYS OF SUB MMI COMPLETION OF GRADING IN THAT AREA TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH SPNLL COVER AL EXPOSED SOILS IF GRADING COMPLETKIN 15 DEUAN YEO LONGER MANY 7 DAYS. PERMENT SEED AND MULCH ORSCO IS REQUIRED WITHIN 3 DAYS OF WMPL Fl OF FINAL GRADING. 17. GENERAL TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNOOT MIX 190 O 100 LBS. PER MORE OR APPROVED EQUAL PERMANENT SEED SALL BE MNOOT MIX 270 O 120 ME. PER ACRE OR APPROBD EQUAL (PINTMO GATES PER SPEC 2575) MULCH SHALL BE MNOOT TYPE 1 (CLERN OAT STRAW) O 2 TONS PER ACNE .0 DISK ANCHORED IN PLACE OR APPROVED EQUAL FERTILIZER SHALL BE 50-80-W NPK PER ACRE (UNLESS P RESTRICTIONS APPLY) ANY INCORPORATED INTO ME SEW BED. 18. IMETFND BUFFER AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED IN ACCORDANCE Mul UNDSCME PLAN 19. NL TEMPORARY EROSION AND NMMENT WNRROL MEASURES SHNL BE IPoPM-Y DISPOSED OF MMM THIRTY (W) DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STASRIIAnON 6 ACHIEVED OR AFTER ME TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE NO LONGER N.M. 20. AN ALTERMTE EROSION k SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE REWIRED FOR LAND DISTURBANCES ON EACH LOT AS PAR OF ANY PMRE BUILDING PERMIT FOR ME CONSIRUCRON OF STRUCTURES AND DRNU IS. SEDIMENT TRAP MMUFMWAM BY WWO.LLCSWXOPEE 4N., CEO PASS.C.RWBAI. MN. OR EOUPL a1...A�tMWM95 �v� m MODEL#CG23 AR v 11 `rsv,lal+uW in1-rtaF r1Na 1, LLE/N CATER ME➢M METE .1 RUN N NI MD REDUCE 6 E41FR " u'.D Art« SElnxn- } YO.S NEU011 IF_.._":. EAv'Y R W`E /RU EMx RW EW1' (M OF CATCH BASIN CRIMEN SEDIMENT TRAP �^o 7 EEPAWMER, 1 5J02A EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE: 1. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR OEMOLRION, SILT FENCE AND FILTERS SHAH BE INSTALLED IS SHOMx TB INTERCEPF RUNOFF. N n W.LL REMAIN IN PUCE AND BE MAINTAINED 2. GO EROSION CONTROL CONTRACTOR ONTR ONS 5 CONTRACTOR CONDRKIN BY THE CESWY SI UNTIL THE SDE WS BEEN STRUCT RCAQA. GWO "DUEAINT MAY REMOVE NECESSARY SOT CONTROL I G/Fl Er TO CONSTRUCT RMOWAYS, WHILE MAINTAINING AIDE%TIRE EROSION CONTHW IN ARNCEM A4FA 3. SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPIIFD TO .ALLOW FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF 9 OF TOPSOIL FOR DISTURBED AREAS TO BE RE -VEGETATED. A. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDUIF SITE GRADING. UIRf1Y INSTNNI IATKAND PAVEMENT LDtETRUCTION W THAT ME GENERAL SITE CAN BE MULCHED AND RE -SEEDED SUCH LATER DISTURBANCE. AREAS THAT MU- NOT BE SUBJECT TO CONSTRICTION MATFIC SHALL BE SEEDED (MnWT MIX IW O 10O//AC AND MULCHED OR SOWED VVIHIN SEVEN (7) MYS OF BEING DISTURBED. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL DMCES AS INDICATED ON THIS EROSION CONTROL PUN AND ANY ADDITIONAL REWIRED BASED ON MEANS, METHODS AND SEWENCES OF WNSINRCPOH. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: 1. SECUMT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MINIMIZE YIMEM MOM ENTERING SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING WITH AND GUTTER SYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLES. 2. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON AL DOWN I7NXEM PERMCIEHS BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTMRES BEGIN, MESE PRACTICES SHILL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. & ME TMING OF ME INSTALATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE AWUSTEO TO ACCOMMODATE SHORN -TERM ACTATTES SUCH AS CLEANING OR GRUBBING. OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES. AN SHORT TERM ACIMIT MUST BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND ME $E .M CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER ME ALTMFY IS COMPUTED. HPMEVER, SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTAtIED BEFORE ME NEXT PREMPTATON EVENT EVEN IF ME MINTY 5 NOT COMPLETE. 4. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROMMTE RMPS WRING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL All SOURCES MH PoTENTI MR DISCHARGING TO ME INLET HAVE BEEN srABluzED. 5. TEMPORARY SOIL SMCKPLES MUST RAW SILT FENCES OR OTHER EFFECINE SEDIMENT CONTROLS. AND CANNOT BE PACED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCWDNG STORY WATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS SORB AND PAGER SYSTEMS, OB CONDUTIS AND WCHMS 6. STYE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES MILL BE AS SHOAM ON ME PVH. ROCK CONSTRUCION ENTRANCES SHA L BE INSTALED AT EACH ENTRANCE. FINAL STABILIZATION ME WNTRUCTIR MUST ENSURE FINAL SIABIUUTCN OF ME SITE ME CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) WIMW .HI DAYS AFTER FINAL SRABIUZATgN 5 COMPLETE, OR ANOTHER OWNER/OPBUTOR (PERMIIQ) HAS ASSUMED CONTROL OF ALL AREAS OF ME SITE TROT HALE NOT UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION.WLL FISTMILuMN CAN BE ACHIEVED IN ME 'MOWING WAY: 31SMRNNC ACTRADES AT ME SITE HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND ALL SORS MUST BE BY A UNIFORM PFAENNUL yr E ATM COVER WRH A DENSTry OF 70 PERCENT ENTIRE PEIMGIS SURFACE AREA OR OMER EWNAWNt4EANS NECESSARY I ;OL FAILURE UNDER EROSIVE CONDIIONS AND: A ALL DRAINAGE ODOM CONSTRUCTED TO D"N WATER FROM ME STE AFTER WNSTRUOION IS COMPUTE, MUST BE STABILIZED TO PRECLUDE MOST; B. AL TEMM .T' SYMHERC, .0 STRUCTURAL EROSION PREVENTON AND SEDIMENT COWIR L BOPS (SUCH AS SILT PENCE) MUST BE REMOVED AS PART OF ME DOE FINAL STABIMADYN; AND c. THE WNTRM:TORS MUST DEAN OUT AL SEGMENT FROM CONEYANCES AND MO 4 TEMPORARY SEGMENTATION BASINS THAT ARE TO BE USED AS PERMANENT WATER QUALIFY MNUGEMENT WINS. SEDIMENT MUST BE STMUZED TO PREVENT I FROM BEING WASHED BACK INTO ME RAISIN, CONVEYANCES OR DRAINAGE WAYS DISCR.RCINC OFF-SRE OR TO SURFACE WATERS. ME CLEAN CUT OF PERMWENIRGSINS MUST BE SURTUMEM TO RETURN THE WIN TO DESIGN GPA:RY. SAMRE EROSIN CONTROL u.vre.um R/SI FOR MDIVII LOTS wlws Z. �a mnJ MY •A�f.N9 Rawy IN wnK m.tans.t ..q U. E,.Mw .eM. aEo.1. w,M.m Yq M4 Mm. eM/s an M1„ rax ' s'n•�-.vm bw�a1 an w<. f ub ..1e. n Lm net. ma Mo3.ew=/. r...«. m«. an ro.. � FITYOf ROSION CONTROL FOR INDIVIDUAL LOTS (TYP.) s DEPAHNAHT I 1'" ': 53026 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: 1. INSPECT SILT u 1uu T AFTER EACH RNNFPll AND AT IEASF GMLY WRING ROLONGED RANI ED FEL P RNNFPIL IMMEDIATELY REPAIR FRIED OR FAILING SILT FENCE 2. REP.ACEMEM - FABRIC S1A4L BE REPUCFD PROMPRY WHEN IT DECOMPOSES OR BWOMES INGiECTNE BEFORE ME CARRIER 5 NO LONGER NECESSARY. 3. SEDIMENT REMWAL - SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE RENCYAW AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APIPROXIMATELY ONE -MAD ME HBGM OF ME BARRIER. TINY SEDIMENT REMAINING IN PUCE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER FACHO IS NO LONGER REWIRED SIN1L BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED. AND SEEDED WITH ME APPROPRIATE SEW MIX, OR SODDED AS DIRECTED BY ME ENGINEER. 4. REMOVAL OF SILT FENCE - SILT FENCES SHA L BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SEINED THEIR USEFUL PURPOSE. BUT NOT BEFORE ME UPWARD SWPING AREA HAS BEEN PERIAMENRT STASIUZED. IF ME UMARO SLOPING AREA, IS TO BE EXPOSED LONGER TAN SIX (6) MONTHS. THAT AREA SHNL BE COVERED WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION WHEN FIRST "NOSED. 5. ME CDWRAC R MUST ROUTINELY INSPECT DW CCNSIAUCDIi SIE ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAIS DURING ACTVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS .AFTER A RANFNL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. 6. ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED WRING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE RECORDED IN ARCING AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED Me ME SWPPP RECORDS OF EACH INSPECTION AND MANTFFYNCE ACTMFT SLALL INCLUDE A GTE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; B. NAME OF PMSON(S) CONWCnxG INSPECT S; C. FUDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCWDNG RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTNE AGTX)NS: D. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCWOING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTMES. E. DATE AND AMOUNT OF AL RAINFALL EVENS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH (0.5 INCHES) IN 24 HOURS E DOCUMENTS OF CHANGES MADE TO ME WPPP AS REQUIRED IN PART IIIA4. 7. WHERE PAPS OF ME CONSTRUCTOR SITE HAVE UNDERGONE FINAL STAID"ATION, BUT WORK REMAINS ON OMER PARTS OF SITE. INSPECFONS OF ME STABIUZED AREAS MAY BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH. WHERE WORK HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CWDIgNS. ME REWIRED INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE MUST TAKE PLACE AS SOON AS RUNOFF OCWRS AT ME SILL OR PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRICTION, WHICHEVER COMES TIROL POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ME CONTRACTOR SRµt IMPLEMENT ME FOLLDWING POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON ME STE: I. SOLD WASTE: COLLECTED SEGMENT. ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MIWNGS, ROATNG DEBRIS. PAPER, PLASTIC. FABRIC, CONSTRUCTION VINO OEMOUCTON DEBRIS AND OMER WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY AM NPG I SMS&L REQUIREMENTS. 2. R3ARDW5 "TORUN, OL, GSIINE PAW AND ANY HVMWUS SUBSTANCES MUST CO PROPERLY STORED, INCLUDING SECONGWt WMANMEM. TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEADS OR OMER OSOWiGE RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE AND GSPOSAL M HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE MHl MPG FdWUTgNS. 3. CONCRETE WASHOUT IS HONE TRUCK BY TRUCK WITH A MOBILE WASHOUT SYSTEM PRONGED MA COMPLETED BY ME CONCRETE CONTRACTOR. WNW MUST HE COMMNED VINO WASTE PROPERLY OSPoSED OF. 4. NO ENGINE DECREASING 6 ALLOWED ON SITE I�an¢�uo No,a YLm+i .i 1s lMLwus. n4v�nEWmsr,sw. Nlxwn6tiA>m9 H 5 wmwru Amu,Faso®1m nselFa2 swL rc Ica v m.VS rm aArIR I1Xc rMw,wwnTSNO raA9:. NuaTz 9wL ,os PRE�"�M`N �z,ON ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inC.com J F- LU ❑ Z Q w F QF z F J O m cn O gU Il Z J w Q Z ❑ li w Q Q Z_ Z O (n w O 0. w I N.,ehy -,rly spImIlmem, or ar.... .a U, m aiE.a ,uw"MIo eY ae, Lc.r PROFESSIONAL EI e. lox, of IF. MINNESOTA MARK PAUSM, PE oat. uE.n,. xP. OUAUTY ASSURANCE/CONTROL DESOHOO: APR .M ELL PROIER N0: 219-0063 9 SHOO 9 of 12 Zl 10 Ol 1l� tNao-sno [ oN 1�3raNa T3 :Nmm OLOL MA I.N91S3a 0i:0L lOx1NW/33mnssw LLnvm Ob0I roX ��wwn •W b 'ItXAYb LIIII Y3053XNIN to •1015 ayl J. o3 aW ,npun p33NgN3 1aN01S531Wd ' pww'n AI^P a we I lol nl 1uWn. pulp OSO L A. ..P•. ,a .0 Aq P..ad.,d on M^du ,yallwlllwd WIold e141 W41 IWa A9mI4 Z m = < m r n D 090L 1 0 v Q Z D 1 { (n D I Z o Z T a 00+9 > m < > 133f 08 NI 31V05 OY m 0 D D Z D Z C C O r N r —r m Lu00'3ummille"A OBOE'9SLZ L9 WV99 NW'9gode8uul(q OOL OpmS anueAV aµanbley.3 EEL .LNVI7IV `I Oo+S ,S'L = 83 00 "NIN w/M 03wnSSV GS'SZOL = A313_,� oo'os+£ = V,S DA) 66ZZOL-'IW ANI DO'MOL WIN IO'nmine W'O 330 £Lrof+£ ro1s Z HN INS 53ON N33ML18 NOLLVWd IV ULL MIMI 01 3na NOLLVW M .01 O sacvt s l a3 omm Z Hw NK 9 L HN / S S'LZOI-3dl OZCO L=380 00+1 Np5 OAd .9 X3 0Z0 L 9 X3 0001 ytl°° ObOI (MS) 9L'ZZO L'IM ANI (3N) 9Z'ZZOI:NI ANI �U+u 09' Z4 (MS) 99 nOL IM ANI (3) S9ZZM:NI ANI Hw LL ML:N18 x'oI Mln9 00'0 ado OO'OS+Z:V1s L HN NVS 1WtlMH MU M / �O 1 . ^4 -If I I I I Z NDOlB I I I I I I I I r- NO L o Me NOLLVA33 aOOld M03 = 331 NOLLVA.3i3 XON NNn] = 393 NOLLVA33 Ia3AN1 MRAHVIIWS - 31 (AN wY3aSNM00 w ) N]LLVIS 3AM MKN AHV11NVs - S a S A VN 03SO60Hd —/— NM1YI VM ]NIISM -" -- — N3M35 AN011MS 0NLLSlU SYd ]NLLSlu --_- NIdO H H ONLLSD 3 - - AInWI M3HH3 9NIISIM MM 3Nn mi 3Nn ALa3dONd X3VNLAS ONIMInG - - - 3Nn 1N3MW] :ON3J3l ITa3 NI 3 os �® N 53WOINW8 AWUOdw31 ' / ' Z llppdy"g()o ao� ipN Hp\� A\` 1rv130 M) H3dd03 M. 3dA1 .I - 1VM n3�yp: (100L 3n130 A,,,) 92 NOS O3a13M 1N31> 101 T�kLkl "6 ),"lNp 'S3Ltlld 1N13a OW SNOUVOH03dS N SVHNV1 30 AlO N3d =VISNI 38 lM SMRw NNwa31VM '9 sA ld 1N13a ow SN]LLVMO3 N35 MVH] 3Il AID N3d Q3PY1SN1 38 T M 53]NN35 N 36 ANYIINVS "L 'WU33NNO3 NFVM 3 VM/N3M35 ]naM ANY M a01ad SMWH It LN LLNVd a a31VM ONY N 71S 3H1 l3V1NO3 in a010Ya1NO3 ALAI '9 'M"O'a ]nand NIHLLM N011]nNI .WY N01 'N ,j LS31V1 .TTINYN Q311-aL fl 3NOZ IOaI103 O330tl1 AWa0dx ICONx HOM MWLd110'O NI IONLNO.I ]HdRLL AatlJWWHL M0 d '9 'ANOM Aalllfl A 30 33WAM NI Sanw BO Tlr] 3NO 31VIS lf3Hd09 A,WN 'I 'S3Nn3anO ONIN33NON3 013S9IHNWf] 30 AW 3141 [IIM AldwO] l S 'M'O'N 31+1 NIH11M XNOM A [Lfl Iry T "N(XI]f1a1SiN)0 d0 IWIS 3H1 m a(Wld SaNa3d 3n NQ3 Tlsl Ods3N SI a01]MLNOO z "NON]nN NW Ol a018d a3H Ni MWW3 39 Th S SNCUVA33 OWSNOLLY 01 33MOS 'S31I_L 1 5NNSIX3 'l :S3UON ,kiniin Imn 1a3tlls -u NOLL0ntl1N0o O I ONltlna 3MOHV" NIVI ON Ol / 553o0V AVM3AItl0 NIVINIVW / O 1N13a Alll X3d j tl m aW Bum 31W1Nfgwtll5 SLz£ 69ZLa O"££O / ZW 1LLZf °° NOLL003SSN00 MAN Vd sV 1N3w3A.Ve / 11 Sill DNILSMtl aNllsOa 3AOLc3a O L'ffOl •OZN \ " lfil'f£Ol 8tlfq SfgN(w11118 .M WOICZ SCOL I (135i30 38 O1 mHlaow NOIS3a) B ZS 31V1d 410 MS 0VS-M-IM dw3L 8,32 r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Z ND019 V/ 63RD - — STREET f ,�J r �4-'. i _i I i —_ EXISTING CANOPY COVER _F STREET MEM1IIm 2- OUTLOT A LEGEND EkSTING CANOPY COVERAGE cd y,-�... PROPOSED CANOPY COVERAGE TO REMAIN [leparipam A Net Fte Artalexdudeswetlmdsl tODK 137,791 5499 B Enisthl[dnoW Cwrcreee d4% 11b,7G1 24ffi C IkyuYed NSlrimumtmoaY fbvetaee 39% ®.118 Ll (tywpensiy lbsidentall D Proposed Campy[aYer;e 40% 95m zm mfk. ee be." Pn2posed ITT fly E OnopYCwere<e &Regirtd CanpY -1),8% Phil oyvemye -D-C P\tM\�1 jP�\ N Pf i FOPOONSSPO N O 25 50 10: e® ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Su to 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.allient-inc.com J Q m Z � J a a w J C7 a a J W a w z a o o U O ¢ a a O i Z Z O h U W i W W a CC cc z a Na, Mh plan np.<dl�ol faatll,y a nal . p,apa,a al an a, .., 'n E:,e[1 iupaMi�on oM tha1 I a dmr uc-fond PpFESSJONAL ENGINEER und., IN, h.. at 1Na Sala of YINNEWTA wm KIyI 2 DDAl11T AM)RANCE/CONTROL xsN+cP: w oRArx: aLL paOJcc, n 219—owll CANOPY CALCULATION III PLANTING NOTES 1. R6THL B' MIN. TOP SD0. TO A-_ SOD AND SEED AREAS. FRI GRABS HL SEND AND SEED AREA 2 SEATO OR MMIX AL PLANT WTERML LOGTpNS PRK)R TO I ET.TKI 1 MTML l-6" DEPRI SHREDDEDNWOANp MULCH AROUND RLOT SV13R BE L TRE NES 1501ATED FROM PLANT BOB A. PLMT G SELL SHALL CONSIST OF T.1:1 SELECT BOMMY TOPSOX, BEAT MJ4, flr RUN DAB. 5. COM"Ca LY GUARANTEE All MURK FOR A POW GE ONE YEAR BEGINNG AT TIE BATE OF ACCEPTANCE DWQ ALL REPLACEMENTS PROMPRY (µ PER OIREG"He BE OYNER). 6. ALL MAIERML 9WL CLVlY NIII THE LAT6T EA'IION OF TIE AY6EG4 STANDARD FOR NURSERY s1DLK. AMERIGW ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. 7. NL TOT TRUNKS SHALL BE WRO 0 WITH BROWN CREPE TREE .NAP. APPLY IN NBRUG ER AND TAATE IN µRIL a. CAL Gen. STATE ONE GAM AT 651-I54-CW2 FOR T`ATNG AU UNGERGRWND LN-RIES µD AMMO DAMAGE TO UNTO DURING THE COURSE OF TIE PARK. 9. WINTNN ALL FLMT MATENI BEWgNS WATERING. UNIR THE TIME OF IGCEPTµGE. 10. CCOROINA.TE INL.W SATON WIM GENEIUL CWIRACION. 11. SYNONG AND GUYING OF TREES OPIONAE: MWAN PwuBNESS OF TREES FOR WMTION OF NMRNRY PERKD, 12. SN,,, AND WASH ALL PAVED SURFACES AND REMOVE H DOM RESDLTWG FROM IANDSCME OF .TIONS. 1]. GENEIYL CONTRACTOR SHALL MID. TIE CWHEY/STATE SOIL k EROSMN 63RD I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I \ 1 \ T I / 1 I / I / A I / I � 1 / SEED PLANTING NOTES SEIDINGOMI M [AN EED R 271, GENERAL ROOMM SEED MINMN STATE SEED MIX 25-14I SEEMNG DATE TO BE 59 EBS/AGN (RARE LIVE ffm) bee Y OWfNc. wuMH SEEDED AREAS MM Mr/DOT TYPE d (MOA ESTIED . FREE) M. AT A RAZE OF I TOM PER ACRE MTHIN 10 HOURS OF SEEONG ARMEN 41OAD THEN BE OY .WmORED TO NET IT FRAM BLOWING AWAY. SEEOMG SHALL BE AP LIED FROM APRIL 15 - AX.Y 20 OR SEPTEMBER 20 - MEN IP. IF HYDROSEEOING BYRUM IRROOMAM_Y 500 GALLONS BE WATER PER ACRE. REFER TO MN/WT SPEC YBA FOR PREFIX NSTAlUTIXR CE HY OECD. ALL NAIVE SEEDS USED ON THIS PRPELT SLA-L BE CRTEIED TO RE BE MINNESOTA ORION BY THE MINNESOTA CROP IMPROVEMENT AGSEGAnON IMCA). SEE To BE PREPARED BY LOOSENING TEPSCL TO A MINIM. GEPTH OR s N1Eb5 THE SEE TO E HARROWED ON RAKED FOLONING BELONG. AND THEN PAIXIX 19NG A MT-PAC(ER OR ECUVAL➢IT 4£ MNEOT BEEDING MANUAL FW REFERENCE MANNERN SEISED AREAS BY WATERING. REMIACNING AND RE MERE AS MEOVSSWY TO ESTABHSI A UNIFORMLY DENSE STAND DE THE SPEOTED GRASSES ENTR ACCEPTED. WY WEAS FAUNG TO ESTARUSH A STAND SNAIL GE RESEEDED. RFFERELEND AND REMILCTED WHENEVER 70% VEGETATVE COVET a NOT AGMEND. REY➢MNG 9ULL GONFIXRM IN ALL REOPEN TO THESE SPEVNGATONS. THE CORTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR µY DAMAGE TO THE WORK AREAS RESULTING FROM EROSION WD/On EQUIPMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SI REPAR DAMAGE, INCLUDING RECRAGRa RESEMBI ETC. AS NECESSARY. BEFORE eWITCANT D.A. CCCNS I I N STREET J 0 20 40 80 — —L - -- - - - - - — - - -- - SCALE IN FEET I-KEMUCI(Y LpiEE1REE __ LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS REDwcn - t TREt wr UANMMPIALED IN ME FRONT Yum FRONED - 1 TREE PEN WE (2 TREES BO,,) t J SEE LED BUSTER sEEB Mlx. BFF EGEIO DEUNEATEO ME RgND OUTLOT A TAKOMA TRAIL FORA�t,wv�`PR� � 001 CO LEGEND OO.F1610M' DELpld15 TRfFS SOROUWS SHRUBS WflVNO BUTER SEED MR MN STALE SEED MIX N-271 (MET MVNW SOUTH G WEST) AREA SEED MR MN STATE SEED MIX 25-111 (BOND GENERAL ROADSM ALLIANT 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758.3080 www.alliant-inc.com ....5y '-fify calc B".or n.d er m. EIncT u"MIA I au" uun ANBSCAPE ARM . o" of M. VINNESOTA Awl MIN plan underor my em! Mm Red NOT under Nol. of Don. Mus. x.. Q—UA11tY AMSKWA110E/CGMIROL DESIGNED: @N ' EPA—. EEL FRGELT N0: 211NHD013 12 GREET 12 Of 12 PLAT FILE NO. R.T. DOC. NO NYE ADDITION NNON NL PERSONS"TNESEMESE :l�Mn B.NyerTulw dtlq Mn N/e P.wmaEbTW,61atMry t6. R➢10,wnv bbwiq>mbeUp asi ntle Ciyd CM lL aC—.. d Miimsde: W3,fi 1. IFNVLLA FSFATESCs—Cwnly. Miraie Nrem®om verb r Wvyad me peen �eorrNemsmae.emm cme wbcv.M=�E wen emec d-+iw.meaW eramin.s . Ey Ne PM. b xeyr wlsearea.�M.Nr.rvwawa.�Nrerwovebrnatem.e Mq te. mta.nen l.�.�vomu.ilr�mm: _aeya m_. Mn 6. Nye Tnar a M" 16 Mtn IbNCb Tup, tleRy Mey 16, mt. STATE OF CO11M1Y OF _ ine rowmamwr vfmxb]go] more me m ue _ary d Eo_� Oy Nn e.Nyn, rnrr dtlx Mn nye RewimEb Tnm.6dr Mry 1s. m1a Now, Punt, mercy, Ptln Gmn.lkHeb lmq Snryv MYvppOM liww No.M110 SFATE OF MNNESOTA COUNIYOFNFNNEPN Tne iununed nr BdnvnW Wde me mbe—ryIX—n—ny PMx.., �1 3 ,d,.image L'msn No..110. No Pubk. Oo Min d W Canmebn EP vI i Y L'lGk.. oiMEIVEN D SEN 2 7 2020 1WN PLANNING DW CMY OF LMWIW45FN RANNNG LOMM66DN PeiFmnntltl nmwlig lvtl mMe�6ryd m_, NOPMnig Lpnrnesm dtiv Ch arred�i. M'cregufe,EM laeb/ 1ne pMta 1b mCmnmo'm, ch dC!WimpMicC24 fiy: Clnimm By: 6mnry LIMNINSSFN RTTOIWEY TI,e Prd m:.weewappmrny firth Amney tr6Mch 6y ch ulm�er CIIYCWNMCITYOFCWJ1110.i6F ,MNNMYTP TNi phta nu aFpNKO YW eUapim Ey 6B Liy Coumid NB Ch dCMNimen. Ninmod ele repubrnmliMNaMnstl Yrc_hYd m_, e.a vM PN e e mnrePm wM,Ne vreeowe aMe�m sMmr. smm smm. swa.z Ciy Courci Ciy IXCNmJawn. Mnn[We 6y: 9y: COUNTY SNNEYOX. G . OUJIFY. MNNESOTA PrsMIb CNpw 3%. M'm l a 1"1. Ne PM lva men epgwee 6`e_Sryd m_ & E. PMM. fianYy S—Wry OOU I DFFO FASUNFRCUNEAWUMY.MNNESOTA IlydH uniYtlm Mw W,.nbe eM Vby Mn MmP.MMW bMaMmTepW.MVENv_Md m— L—,w M.0 .tl man WUN NELOPOEfl.W COMFY, MNNE OTA I NmI, Miy Ew N c Pr a{ TNAME)wu!!ENe— ery of� m._ M_O'CWt_ M.0 Oa.red No. COuray R.. REGROW OFTrt1E3, CARVER GOUMY, MNNFSOTA I rreny mMyCW Ne ptl d IRAT NHNItj nu IbE Ne _Ory d_ m� d_o'ctrk _. M.o ALLIANT ..Ne..na PLAT FILE NO. R.T. DOC. NO L- -__J S89°20i Snag PCNgNG EASEMENT PEP oa. o. A.351. -------------------- VET LAND r \1 L\ 1 .. //\\ ------------- ^ \ NYE ADDITION L�Ommmvtm.MI r— - — --- ---- - -- -- -- — I I I I I 1 I I I I '- r I 81 p r•/ � • •- .- I fit i4 r^�/ F I r- -• r I ffi fsart- _________ ______r—_—_—__—___JLm7..oD n Mee � AIBB°2&3rW f000-00 —I o-o'sraa' t N/I / / I WET LNO a OUTLOT A swrmr[ laa"1 li sso.00 L-sen e-azers• I A i 21 DUCKLANE� i I I I I I I 1 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASNENTS ARE SHONN THUS: I� IIII I III 6 III III I - JIL -�- II (NOT TO SCALE) I I � ' Being 6 feet In width And adjoining lot Uses I and 10 feet In width and adjoining nght of way L____ fil antes otherwiu Mdicated an the plat. THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 3, BLOCK I, LENVILLA Ig ESTATES IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N86°26'35"E. h ' IW ._ - N Denotes monument found 1/2 inch iron pipe IN _ unless otherwise shown .. O Denotes I/2 inch x IS Mdl Iron monument set g F- marked by license no. "110 I ` I I ACOMA TRAIL — a l SWe feet 0 40 60 120 ONE INCH EQUALS FORTY FEET a ALLIANT .eus..n.w P ALLIANT ENGINEERING Letter of Transmittal DATE: March 27, 2020 TO: City of Chanhassen Planning and Zoning 7700 Market Blvd. Chanhassen, MN. 55317 Attn: Sharmeen AI-Jaff FROM: Mark Rausch CITY OF ChANHASSEN RECEIVED MAR 2 7 2020 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT JOB NO.: 2019-0083.0 SENT BY: Mail x Hand Delivered Courier RE: Red Cedar Point — Preliminary Subdivision, Final, and Variance Submittal Copies Date Description 1 3-18-20 Development Application and Fee 1 Application Fee, Delivered Separately by Applicant 7 3-27-20 Submittal Narrative 7 3-27-20 Full Size Subdivision Plan Set (2204) 1 3-27-20 8.5x1 I Subdivision Plan Set 1 3-27-20 11x17 Subdivision Plan Set 7 3-27-20 Final Plat(22x34) 1 3-27-20 Final Plat (8.5x11) 1 3-27-20 Final Plat (I lxl7) REMARKS: Sharmeen, On behalf of Ann Nye and Woody Love, Alliant Engineering is providing the enclosed information for City Review. We respectfully request that you or a member of your staff review the contents of our application to confirm all the necessary information has been provided. Please call me directly at 612-767-9339 should you require any additional information of have and questions. We look forward to working with the City of Chanhassen during the entitlements process. Thank you, Mark COPY TO: Ann Nye, Woody Love 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 612.758.3080 MAIN Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3099 FAx www.alliant-inc.com