The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-06_POWERS CROSSING PROFESSIONAL CENTERCITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CrI Y'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Office/Institutional (01), all those lands within the Plat of Powers Crossing. Section 2. The rezoning of this property is subject to all conditions of City Council approval. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 26a' day of May, 2009. ATTEST: Todd Gerhard, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on gAadminbrdbrdin=ms\remning powers crossing.dac SCANNED g130�14 ?C(- _J8Ub 6-r Oerok-A-sl '��oecl- ��d rlc��-�roCP>sl cxnd oc'+ was (vevec XAP-�, V-r)CA--,n5 4kh5 rezc,oirxii eira nfiftCe- VoO J 69-0� Chanhassen City Council - May 9, 2011 received potted plants as well so, Tiana on behalf of the City and the Environmental Commission I'd like to present you with this certificate and your grand prize award and congratulate you for your pretty picture. Tiana Connelly: Thank you. Mayor Furlong: You're welcome. You're welcome. And if J.R. Relick is here. Good evening. Tonight I'd like to present J.R. with this Certificate of Appreciation from the City of Chanhassen. J.R. was appointed to the Environmental Commission in 2008 and served 3 years on the commission. During that time he brought creativity and passion and commitment to the commission and all their activities. While serving on the commission he contributed to many activities and accomplishments of the commission including environmental stewardship within our city with an Environmental Excellence Award program and other activities, promoting the Arbor Day Poster Contest. We just saw this year's recipient among fifth graders. Revitalizing Arbor Day, which we just celebrated in our city here this last Saturday with the spirit of the day and planting trees and donated much of his time and talent for public education on July 3rd and July 4t° events. So J.R. on behalf of the City Council and all the residents, thank you for your service. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Ernst moved, Councilman McDonald seconded that the City Council approves the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Approval of Minutes: -City Council Work Session Minutes dated April 25, 2011 -City Council Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated April 25, 2011 Receive Commission Minutes: -Planning Commission Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated April 19, 2011 b. Resolution#2011-26: 2011 Street Improvement Project 11-01: Approve Change Order No. 1 Concerning Tree Removal and Landscaping. C. Powers Crossing Professional Center: Approve One -Year Extension of Preliminary Plat, Tim Erhart. d. Liberty at Creekside: Approve One -Year Extension of Preliminary Plat, B. Elmer Farms, LLC (Bruce Jeurissen). e. Resolution#2011-27: Chanhassen Village Apartments Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project Nos. I1-02-1 and 11-02-2: Approve Quotes. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952.227i100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone:952.2271180 Fax:952.227.1190 Engineering Phone:952.227.1160 Fax:952.227.1170 May 11, 2011 Mr. Tim Erhart 9611 Meadowlark Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Powers Crossing Professional Center — Planning Case #09-06 Dear Mr. Erhart: This letter is to confirm that on May 9, 2011, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension (until May 26, 2012) for the preliminary plat and other development approvals associated with Powers Crossing Professional Center, Planning Case #09-06. Final plat documents must be submitted thirty (30) days prior to city council Finance consideration. The final plat must address all of the preliminary plat conditions Phone:952.227.1140 of approval. Enclosed is the list of items required for final plat submittal. Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at Phone:952.227.1120 (952) 227-1131 orbgeneroustc�ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Fax: 952.227.1110 Sincerely, Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Robert Generous, AICP Planning & Senior Planner Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Public works Todd Gerhardt, City Manager 7901 Park Place Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Phone: 952227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 Enclosure Senior Center 9.\plan\2009 plarmmg cases\09-06 powers crossing professional centerxpreliminary plat extension letter 201 l.doc Phane:952.2271125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 03NNVOS Chanhassen is a Community for Life -Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to CITYOF City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: CIIANIIASSEN 1. Submit three (3) sets of full size, 50 scale construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. (700 Market Boulevard • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities PO Box147 (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must Chanhassen, MN 55317 show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, Administration wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, Phone:952.2271100 EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. Fax:952.227.1110 • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. Building Inspections • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. Phone:952.227,1180 Fax:952.2271190 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and Engineering contributing areas to catch basins. Phone:952.227.1160 Fax:952.227.1170 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. Finance Phone:952.227.1140 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). Fax: 952227.1110 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). Park & Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Improvements: Fax:952.227.1110 a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. Recreation Center c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and 2310 Coulter Boulevard maintenance. Phone:952.227.1400 d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. Fax:952.227.1404 e. Erosion control. Planning & f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). Natural Resources g. Site grading Phone:952.227.1130 h. Street lights & signs Fax:952.227.1110 i. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping Public Works 7901 Park Place 7. Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (8'V x 11"), and Phone:952.22T1300 a digital copy in Aif format. Fax:952.22TI310 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc format. Senior Center Phone:952.22T1125 9. Lot tabulations Fax:952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Councfl- Updated 11-29-06 g:\eng\ orm \final plat submittal.dim han�rassen is a Community for Life -Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow I U l- MEMORANDUM CITY OF TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager CHANHASSEN FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner 7700 Market Boulevard DATE: May 9, 2011 PC Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJ: Powers Crossing Professional Center, Planning Case #09-06 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952,227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227,1160 Fax: 952.227,1170 PROPOSED MOTION "Me Chanhassen City Council approves a one-year extension until May 26, 2012 for the preliminary plat and development approvals for Powers Crossing Professional Center, Planning Case #09-06." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. [MollAy\/ _ Iutu_a C 1 Rni The property owner, Tim Erhart, is requesting a one-year extension of the Phone: 952.227.1140 preliminary plat for Powers Crossing Professional Center to May 26, 2012. The Fax:952.227.1110 extension is necessary due to the current depressed market conditions for development and construction and the delay in the turn back of the excess right -of - Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 way. The project is located at the southeast comer of Powers Boulevard and US Fax:952,227.1110 Highway 212. Beaeation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Fr,ra 553 [4 1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Pudic Works 1591 Park Road Phow 952.227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 Senior Center Plane: 952.227,1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site Section 18-41 of the Chanhassen City Code requires that the subdivider request final wivaci.chanhassen.mn.us plat approval within one year of the preliminary plat approval unless a request, in writing, is submitted to the City requesting for good cause for an extension of the preliminary plat. Staff can attest to the slowdown in the development market due to the existing economic conditions. Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED Todd Gerhardt Powers Crossing Professional Center May 9, 2010 Page 2 of 4 The City and developer worked diligently to create a well -designed project. This project is the linchpin for the rest of development in the 2010 Metropolitan Urban Service Area due to the location of a future sanitary sewer lift station at Powers Boulevard and the future east -west road. The schematic to the right represents a concept for development of this area. There have been no amendments to the City Code that would adversely affect the conditions of approval for the Powers Crossing Professional Center development. All the conditions of approval shall remain in force for the development. All fees were specified as those in effect at the time of final plat approval. Staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request for a one-year extension to May 26, 2012. BACKGROUND On May 24, 2010, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension to the development approval until May 26, 2011. On May 26, 2009, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: A. Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional District, OI." Please note that the rezoning of the parcel is only effective with the final platting of the subdivision. B. Conditional Use Permit with Variances to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor. C. Subdivision (Preliminary Plat) creating one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right- of-way, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009. Todd Gerhardt Powers Crossing Professional Center May 9, 2010 Page 3 of 4 i ✓� 1 1 1 i '-- 1 • I 1 I I 1 � I I 1 I 1 D. Site Plan with Variances for building height and Bluff Creek Primary Zone setbacks for Planning Case #08-16, for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square - foot professional office building, and up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp on Lot 1, Block 1 of the development, plans prepared by Pope Associates, Inc. and Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009. II Enka MCIl 11 1 trt r i 1 A�l jl t1,1 . and Todd Gerhardt Powers Crossing Professional Center May 9, 2010 Page 4 of 4 E. A sign size Variance request to permit an eight (8) foot tall sign with up to 64 square feet of sign display area. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: "The Chanhassen City Council approves a one-year extension until May 26, 2012 for the preliminary plat and other development approvals for Powers Crossing Professional Center, Planning Case #09-06." ATTACHMENTS 1. Email from Tim Erhart to Bob Generous dated April 18, 2011. 9Aplan\2009 planning c \09-06 powers crossing pmfessioml centar exte ion memo preliminary plat 2011.dm Generous, Bob From: Tim Erhart [terhart@exlar.com] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 12:58 PM To: Generous, Bob Subject: FW: notice of preliminary plat exp 2011.doc Attachments: notice of preliminary plat exp 2011.doc Bob, As we discussed this morning let's go ahead and extend this for another year. Let me know if you need something from me. Thanks tim is • CITY OF CNANHASSEN 7700 Markel Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax:952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 Fax:952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax:952.2271310 Senior Center Phone:952.227,1125 Fax:952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us April 4, 2011 Mr. Bill Katter United Properties, LLC 3500 American Boulevard West Minneapolis, MN 55431 Or, Timothy A. & Dawne M. Erhart 9611 Meadowlark Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case #09-06 Dear Mr. Katter or Mr. Erhart: On May 24, 2010, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension until May 26, 2011 for the preliminary plat and development approvals for Powers Crossing Professional Center, Planning Case #09-06. Section 18-41 of the Chanhassen City Code requires that the subdivider request final plat approval within one year of the preliminary plat approval unless a request, in writing, is submitted to the City requesting for good cause for an extension of the preliminary plat. Final plat documents must be submitted to the City thirty (30) days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat. Should you neither request a final plat approval or request an extension of the preliminary plat, the preliminary plat shall become null and void. Any future development of the site would require a new development review. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincere Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure c: Mark Undestad cc: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager 9:\plan\2009 planning mes\09-06 powers crossing professional centednotice of preliminary plat exp 2011.doc Chanhassen is a Cc mmun ity to r Lif e - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED MY OF 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Adn inistrafm Phone:952,227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Builrfing Irspec6orrs Phone: 952227.1180 FW: 952,227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227,1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone:952,227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Caper Boulevard Phan: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227,1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phase: 952.227.1130 Far: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Gender Phone:952.227.1125 Fax:952.227.1110 Web Site wwwAchanhassen.mn.us May 25, 2010 Mr. Bill Katter United Properties, LLC 3500 American Boulevard West Minneapolis, MN 55431 Re: Powers Crossing Professional Center — Planning Case #09-06 Dear Mr. Katter: This letter is to confirm that on May 24, 2010, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension (until May 26, 2011) for the preliminary plat and other development approvals associated with Powers Crossing Professional Center, Planning Case #09-06. Final plat documents must be submitted thirty (30) days prior to city council consideration. The final plat must address all of the preliminary plat conditions of approval. Enclosed is the list of items required for final plat submittal. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or blaenemus@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincere�} Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator c: Timothy A. & Dawne M. Erhart 9611 Meadowlark Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Enclosures Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED . ._ Chanhassen City Council - May 24, 2010 Center Park right near the library. We had a dedication of that monument one year ago and the American Legion with their Commander Gary Boyle, myself and others will be there to participate in a Memorial Day celebration here in the City of Chanhassen. There will be a picnic for all involved afterwards held at the American Legion. Should be a fun event and we invite everyone to come and join our veterans, friends, neighbors as we assemble on Memorial Day 2010 to pay tribute to the men and women who have served our country and across the entire United States so that will be a fun event. It was a great event last year. Nearly 1,000 people came and showed up and looking forward to a very well attended event this year as well. I've already signed the proclamation that it will be a nice, warm day. Perhaps not as warm as today but weather will be fine so look forward to seeing everybody then. We'll move on now to our consent agenda. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Litsey moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Approval of Minutes: -City Council Work Session Minutes dated May 10, 2010 -City Council Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated May 10, 2010 Receive Commission Minutes: -Planning Commission Work Session Minutes dated May 4, 2010 -Park and Recreation Commission Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated April 27, 2010 b. Resolution #2010-47: he Arbors, Project 07-05: Accept Streets and Utilities. C. Approve Extension of Preliminary Plat for Powers Crossing Professional Center. d. Approve Amendment to Southwest Transit Station Agreement Extending the Deadline for the Project. f. Resolution #2010-48: Approve Resolution Celebrating Campfire USA's 10& Year. g. Approve Agreement to Allow an Auto Repair Garage in Property Zoned Planned Unit Development. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: None. LAW ENFORCEMENT/FIRE DEPARTMENT UPDATES. Lt. Jim Olson: Good evening and thank you. Before you this evening I've got my packet with the Sheriff s Office Area Report for the month of April, along with the Citation List and the Community Service Officer Report. Are there any questions regarding that at all? CITYOF 7700 Markel Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952,227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1161 Fax: 952,227.1170 Finance Phone:952,227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park 8 Rereation Phone: 952,227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Coder 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227,1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227,1110 Public works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952,227.1300 Fax: 952,227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952,227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: May 24, 2010 W, SUBJ: Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case #09-06 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a one-year extension until May 26, 2011 for the preliminary plat and development approvals for Powers Crossing Professional Center, Planning Case #09-06." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The developer, United Properties, is requesting a one-year extension of the preliminary plat for Powers Crossing Professional Center to May 26, 2011. The extension is necessary due to the current depressed market conditions for development and construction. The project is located at the southeast comer of Powers Boulevard and US Highway 212. Web Site Section 18-41 of the Chanhassen City Code requires that the subdivider request final www achanhassen.mn.us plat approval within one year of the preliminary plat approval unless a request, in writing, is submitted to the City requesting for good cause for an extension of the preliminary plat Staff can attest to the slowdown in the development market due to the existing economic conditions. SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Todd Gerhardt Powers Crossing Professional Center May 24, 2010 Page 2 of 3 The City and developer worked diligently to create a well -designed project. This project is the linchpin for the rest of development in the 2010 Metropolitan Urban Service Area due to the location of a future sanitary sewer lift station at Powers Boulevard and the future east -west road. The schematic to the right represents a concept for development of this area. There have been no amendments to the City Code that would adversely affect the conditions of approval for the Powers Crossing Professional Center development. All the conditions of approval shall remain in force for the development. All fees were specified as those in effect at the time of final plat approval. Staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request for a one-year extension to May 26, 2011. BACKGROUND On May 26, 2009, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: A. Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional District, OI." Please note that the rezoning of the parcel is only effective with the final platting of the subdivision. B. Conditional Use Permit with Variances to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor. C. Subdivision (Preliminary Plat) creating one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right- of-way, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009. I I �-- '. W 1 � 1 1 TI • I 1 1 1 1 1 Todd Gerhardt Powers Crossing Professional Center May 24, 2010 Page 3 of 3 D. Site Plan with Variances for building height and Bluff Creek Primary Zone setbacks for Planning Case #08-16, for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square - foot professional office building, and up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp on Lot 1, Block 1 of the development, plans prepared by Pope Associates, Inc. and Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009. and E. A sign size Variance request to permit an eight (8) foot tall sign with up to 64 square feet of sign display area. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: "The Chanhassen City Council approves a one-year extension until May 26, 2011 for the preliminary plat and other development approvals for Powers Crossing Professional Center, Planning Case #09-06." ATTACHMENTS 1. Letter from William P. Katter to Robert Generous dated May 4, 2010. 2. Letter from Robert Generous to Bill Katter dated June 5, 2009. gAplan\2009 planning cases\09-06 powers crossing professional centerextension memo preliminary plat 2010.dm May 4, 2010 Mr. Robert Generous, AICP City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Powers Crossing Professional Center Dear Mr. Generous: RECEIVED MAY 5 - 2010 CITY OF CHANHASSEN This letter is written to request an extension of our preliminary plat approval for the captioned project. Currently, there is insufficient market demand for the project, and in general, new development remains non -feasible given significant vacancy rates and lack of available financing for projects. United Properties continues to pursue healthcare and other professional office users for the site and if we are able to identify an anchor for the project, we will then request final plat approval. We will keep the City apprised of any improvement in market conditions. We would greatly appreciate the City working with us to effect this extension. Sincere William P. Katter Sr. Vice President United Properties cc: Timothy Erhart 3500 American Blvd. W. Suite 200 Minneapolis. MN 55431 T 952.835.5300 F 952.893.8206 upfopenies.com 7700 Market Boulevat PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax 952.227.1190 Pngineerie9 Phone: 952,227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone.952.227,1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevwd Plane: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning 3 Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax 952.227,1310 Seniercenter Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www6chanhassen.maus June 5, 2009 Mr. Bill Katter United Properties, LLC 3500 American Boulevard West Minneapolis, MN 55431 Re: Powers Crossing Professional Center — Planning Case #09-06 Dear Mr. Katter: This letter is to confine that on May 26, 2009, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: A. "Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional District, OI." Please note that the rezoning of the parcel is only effective with the final platting of the subdivision. B. "Conditional Use Permit with Variances to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; subject to the following conditions: 1. The property line may be revised to incorporate the reconveyed property from MnDOT to the developer. 2. The developer shall is encouraged to meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines (MSBG). 3. To mitigate for the effects of development within the primary corridor, the developer should be required encouraged to meet green construction standards for the whole site. 4. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 2 of 11 5. Evaluate other site designs, stormwater management techniques and low -impact development practices for their benefit in reducing impacts to the primary and secondary zones of the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 6. Reforest those areas disturbed to grade the site but do not have structures on them. The reforestation should be done with deciduous tree species representative of the existing species composition. The forested areas are dominated by bur oak. 7. Maintain the natural drainage patterns. 8. The applicant must clearly illustrate how impacts to the primary zone are to be mitigated. This mitigation must consider all benefits derived from the primary zone as described in Article XXXI of the Chanhassen City Code. 9. The area east of Lot I within Outlot A within the primary corridor of Bluff Creek shall be covered by a conservation easement. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. Any wetland mitigation activities that are required within this area shall have final approval by City staff. No additional activities shall be allowed within this area and access to the mitigation site shall be the existing path. 10. The wooded areas of Lot 1 and Outlot B within the Bluff Creek primary zone shall be covered by a conservation easement that restricts specific activities and prohibits any further development within the area." C. "Subdivision (Preliminary Plat) creating one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right- of-way, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to the following conditions: The developer shall either dedicate/donate an Outlot or record a conservation easement containing the Bluff Creek Primary zone north of the road right-of-way in Outlot A. This area of Outlot A is undevelopable and the land within the conservation easement could not be used in future phases for density transfer purposes. A conservation easement shall be recorded over the Bluff Creek Primary zone located within Lot 1 and Outlot B. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. The easement shall be recorded Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 3 of 11 with the first phase of the development. 2. Submit proposed names for street labeled "Access Road" on plans for approval. 3. The drainage report and plans must be revised to address comments from MnDOT. 4. The applicant must obtain a MnDOT drainage permit. 5. The drainage report and plans must be modified so that the peak discharge rate to the off - site wetland does not increase under fully developed conditions. 6. The plans must be revised to provide either an overland emergency overflow or an additional outlet control structure at a higher elevation. 7. The developer must submit a letter from an engineer stating that the retaining wall east of the building can accommodate temporary ponding behind the wall. 8. The alignment of the bypass storm sewer pipe must be redesigned to eliminate excess cover over the pipe. 9. If MnDOT allows a connection to the Highway 212 storm pipe, then show the existing pipe on the plan sheets. 10. Building permits are required for retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 11. A manhole must be installed at the terminus of the sanitary sewer. 12. All sanitary sewer and water -main within Lot 1, Block 1 shall be privately owned and maintained. 13. The storm sewer that will convey runoff from the drainageway to the east of the property shall also be privately owned and maintained, including those portions that lie within public right-of-way and the City owned outlot. 14. The 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement shown on the preliminary plat over this storm sewer must be deleted. Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 4 of 11 15. Delete the 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement for the future watermain. 16. Provide a temporary blanket drainage and utility easement — or similar mechanism acceptable to the City - over the proposed forcemain corridor. The temporary easement shall not encroach into the building envelope as shown on the site plan. 17. A permanent 20-foot wide easement will be required over the final forcemain alignment. 18. Each new lot will be subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. These fees will be collected with the building permit, subject to the rates in effect at the time of building permit, and shall be based on the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' SAC unit determination. 19. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 20. All public utility improvements will require a preconstruction meeting before building permit issuance. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required, including the MPCA, Department of Health, Carver County and Watershed District. 21. Upon project completion as -built drawings must be submitted for the private utilities. 22. The developer must ensure that all traffic study data is provided to Carver County for their review and must incorporate Carver County and MNDOT's comments into the plan. 23. An updated traffic study must be submitted with Phase 2 improvements. Powers Crossing's financial obligations with respect to the signal installation will be determined at that time and incorporated into the Site Plan Agreement for Phase 2. 24. A temporary roadway, drainage and utility easement must be provided over the cul-de- sac at the east end of the access road. 25. This property is subject to the Arterial Collector Fee which is $3,600 per developable acre. The acreage used in this calculation shall include the right-of-way turnback from Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 5 of 11 both Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. This fee shall be paid in cash with the final plat 26. The RIM and Flowage Easements need to be indicated on the plat. This should include the document number 10-05-87-1. 27. The wetland mitigation area in Outlot A needs to be created. A Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants needs to be executed and recorded with Carver County. This document number needs to be included on the plat. 28. The remaining conditions of approval for WAP #2006-32 need to be met: a. The plans shall be revised to show how M-1 will be accessed. The access route shall be stable, shall avoid damage to significant trees (greater than 10" DBH) and shall avoid impacts to natural drainageways and any jurisdictional wetlands that may exist on site that were not delineated by Westwood Professional Services in August 2006. b. A planting plan for M-1, including invasive vegetation management techniques, species to be planted, proposed planting rates, and the approach to upland buffer restoration, shall be submitted prior to final City Council approval. c. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit equal to 110% of the cost of the wetland creation (including grading and seeding) to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland are met. The letter of credit shall be effective for no less than five years from the date of final plat approval. The applicant shall submit a cost estimate for wetland creation (including grading and seeding) so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of credit. d. A five-year wetland replacement monitoring plan shall be submitted. The replacement monitoring plan shall include a detailed management plan for invasive non-native species, particularly hybrid cattail, purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. The plans shall show fixed photo monitoring points for the replacement wetland. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. 29. The legal wetland boundary of the RIM wetland was not delineated in the Westwood Wetland Delineation Report dated August of 2006. This boundary must be delineated and wetland impacts avoided where possible. Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5,2009 Page 6 of 11 30. Because of the perpetual RIM and flowage easements the plans must be provided to the Natural Resources Conservation Service for review and comment. Any comments from the NRCS must be made available to the City. 31. Drainage to the RIM wetland from the south flows through a defined swale. The conveyance of this flow must be maintained under the proposed road extension. 32. Erosion Control plan needs to be updated per the July comments: a. Show a 75-foot rock construction entrance. b. Show rounding of comers for proposed grades. c. Erosion control blanket shall be shown on all slopes east of the proposed building and adjacent to the pond. d. An NPDES permit must be obtained prior to any site grading and a SWPPP must be provided to the City for review and comment. e. Replace MnDOT 340 mix with a modified BWSR U7 seed mix. 33. Estimated SWMP fees due at the time of final plat are $271,506.20. 34. The development must comply with Carver Soil and Water Conservation District comments. 35. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. 36. The following practices are required in order to insure the best chance of survival for the highlighted oaks to be preserved along the east side of the development: a. Understory trees near the oaks shall be preserved. b. Roots at the grading limits shall be cut cleanly with a trencher or vibratory plow. c. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed prior to any grading. d. Trees shall be thoroughly watered during dry periods. 37. The applicant shall install a second tier to the retaining wall at the north end of the east side of the development to preserve the grade surrounding the oaks proposed to be saved. Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 7 of 11 38. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall be in place and maintained until all construction is completed. 39. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans, dated 10/06/08, will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 40. All trees removed shall be chipped or hauled off site. No burning permits shall be issued. 41. The developer shall pay the full park dedication fee in force at the time of final plat approval and prior to recording. 42. Construction of the 10-ft. wide bituminous access road trail and the North Trail. The North Trail plans shall be modified dedicating a permanent 20-foot wide trail easement to allow for appropriate separation from adjoining improvements and boulevard areas for winter plowing, snow storage and aesthetics. 43. Dedication of a permanent triangular shaped trail easement at the South East comer of Lot 1, Block 1. The triangle shall be 50' in length on its South side and 200' in length on its East side. 44. The developer shall finance the cost or a portion of the 2010 MUSA trunk lift station and enter into an agreement with the City for repayment at the time of final plat." D. "Site Plan with Variances for building height and Bluff Creek Primary Zone setbacks for Planning Case #08-16, for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office building, and up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp on Lot 1, Block 1 of the development, plans prepared by Pope Associates, Inc. and Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final plat for the development shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The full buildout is predicated upon a tumback to the land owner of MnDOT right-of- way. In the event that this tumback does not occur, the applicant may build a four-story building totaling 112,000 square feet subject to parking compliance with City Code. Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 8 of 11 3. The developer is encouraged to meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEER) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines, MSBG. 4. The developer shall continue the architectural detailing through the use of the three brick colors as well as the use of stone and metal on the garage structure. 5. The developer shall provide secure bicycle racks and/or storage (within 200 yards of a building entrance) for 5% or more of all building users (measured at peak periods), and provide shower and changing facilities in the building. The developer should also provide benches throughout the site as well as tables and chairs in the patio area. 6. The buildings are required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 7. The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 8. Accessible routes must be provided between commercial building(s), parking facilities and public transportation stops. 9. All parking areas, including parking structure, must be provided with accessible parking. 10. The developer shall comply with the minimum parking setback requirement and install appropriate berming and or landscaping to allow the 10 feet setback. 11. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 12. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. 13. The applicant shall install a second tier to the retaining wall at the north end of the east side of the development to preserve the grade surrounding the oaks proposed to be saved. Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5,2009 Page 9 of 11 14. The applicant does not meet required landscape quantities for parking lot trees and islands/peninsulas in both phases. The applicant must meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees and landscape islands/peninsulas. 15. Phase I: The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for either of the bufferyard areas. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to meet minimum requirements. 16. Phase IL The applicant does not meet the minimum requirements for bufferyard areas. The applicant shall increase the plantings to meet minimum requirements_ 17. The applicant must replace the Colorado spruce with other approved species in the plant schedule. 18. All transplanted materials must be pre -approved by the City. Transplanted trees will not be accepted if substituted without City approval. If approved for transplanting, the material must be warranted for a minimum of one year. If transplanted materials die, they must be replaced with nursery stock. 19. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall be in place and maintained until all construction is completed. 20. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans, dated 04/01/09, will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 21. All trees removed shall be chipped or hauled off site. No burning permits shall be issued. 22. The North Trail plans or parking lot design shall be modified to allow for appropriate boulevard areas for winter plowing, snow storage and aesthetics. 23. A Moot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, and nothing shall be placed in front of the hydrant outlets, connections, fire protection control valves that would interfere with fire fighter operations. Section 508.5 MN. Fyre Code and Sec. 5085.4. 24. No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be removed or chipped on site. Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 10 of 11 25. Contact the Chanhassen Fire Marshal for locations of "No Parking Fire Lane" signage, and locations of curbing to be painted yellow. MN Fire Code Sec. 503.3. 26. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. MSFC sec 501A. 27. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. MSFC Sec. 503.2.3. 28. Due to the unknown timeframe associated with the signal installation, an updated traffic study must be submitted with Phase 2 improvements. Powers Crossing's financial obligations with respect to the signal installation will be determined at that time and incorporated into the Site Plan Agreement for Phase 2." and E. "A sign size Variance request to permit an eight (8) foot tall sign with up to 64 square feet of sign display area, subject to the following conditions: 1. Separate sign permits shall be required for each sign. 2. The development name in the monument sign shall be individual dimensioned letters with a minimum'h-inch projection. 3. Only one monument sign shall be permitted for the Powers Crossing Professional Center site. 4. The sign height for the directional signs shall be reduced to five feet. The display area for sign #2 shall be reduced to four square feet. 5. The sign location shall meet all setback and site triangle requirements." Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 11 of 11 Final plat documents must be submitted to the City 30 days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Conditions of the preliminary plat approval must be addressed for final plat approval. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat approval. Also enclosed is a site plan agreement that must be executed by United Properties. Note that if there is a different property owner and/or mortgage holder on the property, they will need to sign the consent(s) at the end of the agreement. Return the agreement to me for City execution and recording at Carver County within 120 days of the final plat approval. The required security specified in the site plan agreement ($5,000.00) shall be submitted prior to the City issuing a building permit. A copy of the executed agreement will be returned for your files. The City may not issue a building permit for this project until the final plat documents and all required fees and security have been executed and submitted to the City. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerel Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator c: Timothy A. & Dawne M. Erhart 9611 Meadowlark Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Enclosures 9:tplan\2009 planning cam\09-06 powers crossing professional =tertapproval letter.do April 21, 2010 CITY OF CIM16SEN Mr. Bill Katter 7700 Market Bouleyard United Properties, LLC PO Box 147 3500 American Boulevard West Chanhassen, MN 5217 Minneapolis, MN 55431 Re: Powers Crossing Professional Center — Planning Case #09-06 AftinisbatiDn Mm:952.227.1100 Dear Mr. Katter: Fax:952.227.1110 Building Inspections This letter is to notify you that on May 26, 2009, the Chanhassen City Council Phone: 952.227.1160 approved the preliminary plat for Powers Crossing Professional Center including Fax:952,227.1190 rezoning, conditional use permit with variance and site plan approval with variances, which were all contingent on the final platting of the property. Engineering Plane` 952227.1160 Section 18-41 of the Chanhassen City Code requires that the subdivider request Fax:952.227.1170 final plat approval within one year of the preliminary plat approval unless a Finance request, in writing, is submitted to the City requesting for good cause for an Phone:952.227.1140 extension of the preliminary plat. Final plat documents must be submitted to the Fax:952.227.1110 City thirty (30) days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for Park & Recrealion final plat. Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax:952.227.1110 Should you neither request a final plat approval or request an extension of the Recreation Cep preliminary plat, the preliminary plat shall become null and void. Any future 2310 Coulter Boulerud development of the site would require a new development review. If you have Phone:952.227.1400 any questions, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or Fax:952.227.1404 beenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Planning & Sincerelv Natural Resources Phane: 952.227.1100 Fax:952.227.1110 � \J Public Works Robert Generous, AICP 1591 Park Road Senior Planner Phone:952.227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 Enclosure Senior Cerrer Phone:952.227.1125 C Tim Erhardt Fax:952.227.1110 ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Weber Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer wwwd.chanhassennn.us Todd Gerhardt, City Manager g9plan\2009 planning cases\09-06 powers crossing professional centeAnotice of prelim plat expiration.doc SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Bluff Creek Overlay District R.na .ao. yy.p.�ylnnnbry CORRIDOR Qq�m San.NY 1HnPoa3 t loco equtls 6601en Future Trails *"%,.y Existing Trails Trail Map October 14, 2008 owns \ \\\ l ,nu,NmA .o nY,fm� / � iRMr \ W4' JAI I � N1Ny1NEp BY RARP�.'CE 15iLRA NS R�645iNi �i{EIM MS PV1N 51 [6 PIMEO N FIEI 9 1 4 40.W GN T1 ri B ANffiJ]C1RY \ 1 4 QD Y � ��Ati.7r •.. - \ - '" '-- NOT FOR CONSTRUCQON .'^ BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ZONE EKHBrr 06/10/08 '��. 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 � i I I I I I I I I I 1 I I , I gran I I cA _ s�11"54 r A-I•JVW u L_ IM97 A*axW A-J".50 L- snsR � °; 4 72 ( 46 I I L r �' �'� A Hw+. - - �I 1 i� 1 V=A; I tiy1/ I ! Id �i%' ! 1 OVMOT AL.O Asrar+r► I I iIMW X FAN LOT 1 z_ \\�i �i tit oo•SOT 1Ia47- 3 IIIm6-mwEl aNNadm =F.J"JT seam i i --- mmonmr --- --- T-- T- T---- T I L------ v I I I if NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION OM pl d dtluf A 9I)EBI/I TZ IOY1M( umM9 to N. r.mpd pb( Nem/, [e,a� LrvntY 10.WA ®MI bt. W � bvl b M.*mf aI Lmi>Lu(an Pp,f-cFWY M M ie a per s IOF15 a®a naesw,u mvrm >xvelopxlwar Sumun y of 1. Be> 1: 6df ma blbf A 1610J eea aew s i. v. MW.4D 90I) ff MY MALL/KN RUY /.IG os Lol 6r,n1n� m .ewtV b IM mabl en MJ.N d a bef N av Lr. rpnM b M .wLal 0.N ay. �10 MI NYFaL bFerc b Pca!WI Wpm} mO M.Mgne a s,wb J ,N �Ip� FibM1 lbYtt O T. STATE RAIE OW CAl1 NE T. ar ba al-n�MM w )r r� Iboo-RSR-ny i \ \Y I ; I I I _ I r L---I i$�io 1 •• A.�N�iaa' i'� U rsnn i ram ` s: ' i A so-44*j" r ANN" r , � r r � ' , L I , I i cec�vn +- sm,ba Pon ® wnxa ru -f Sar a..•..w.., rS ear � -f � �. 6 rv'vra.wa ® av uunn a w.o .sm b d�N bia'YA' ® My vru[ Q s�Yti LIu F] am uw QQ pL g nLm a rs aia F e �muisiu¢ ® us L.v wv Orf.fu. 461Tu¢ m u�[ wtr -.- IY61Lt e aka' W4[ A x�mnwr. � OiYm ® aMr ar M LLawn rrr POR Assow2s IIc s F. Pdu Ovc 5)PP,vMiallo..+.+sm UNITED PROPERTIES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 WtY s, wAr r� w MMv PRELUANARY PLAT —k l®fmDY S-- C2 LOGEND as,m p wrHw� n s�.,o,r t mam¢.¢ .. MR of M1O Ga/e umos4 a ,v[ ��f Rv usrm/o m...aw.a o �axs.•.e. —�-- a .ac v, ® m.r a,oruw • �w rwr ® air co vry OO o �� •rvc vrn¢ �� ` me.�r ywwi ® us ra v�� e.¢uc �smv.uni A xwwrr —� ea+r'®x� OOPRiJi STALE ONE CALL wmr ra r� ,-mo-az-i,a 11t1A A1VE NRWY TL t as Nodm c ,.a m wraoa,mwt ®ry ro w per C -W Not- F t, .0 Mb _P'.N.V O'.I m,J 2/41Y OT FOR CONSTRUCTION NNIT[1 RRURERTIES Powers Crossing Professional Center City SublWal Set 4-01-09 YY\ >NNNFOIp IN - Nal\ - �Cl L Grading Lagend 003112 ONNUOR — — PrwnT uYE —W— �b� xmmu cvnwm TOO Al0 arld POY Wu1u YA,EA IEHt EMTET d0 YCIIM (N .TETT M RPRM) la YNI W. W4RA g,MNG YAY ME ax mYn NE WMMG W15 Nl]t CaSIRUCMN dAN1'S K09a fLXIRn B..IISr 11Bf IalaUl,9aln Wi 9Ol AEWl01 NP NN BBIIW w avE. NYL a e9Nn.Eassl MET. eYwn OP ATE IE OW Ty W- U11 .Y a .+ wl� N. Ta Erg .-Boo-zsz-nM - slacvl iww m n]moii: mw]c canon oEYi¢i swi iwsaN w MwoMAm YAmor srAwAwL a rt saps suu K aA®m xT a NA,9s. NaEs onmc4 1 QA70 W U6 9EEI. ]. OIIM.CIa 9WL VfUBLY aIS MF/S NMI WR 6 W.P6 MO gp1CC . 9f1OM P]Bm sB6A6 NT1 Yf,M1 sLES R1B611 NYIIS Nw[ u£V.11n6 YE sY..M a Rl1EN1 LOI POIR NN FPSIM% l G f1EVA1q.5E [4 9U.PI MMl.R iM9m P.lf.dr ElEVA1.M A Clrld nA UWOIIfPLLZ Ip1FB. PNF43B MIU.Y6 AR ro {YBEO ,,,E. aAm B iEE 2o1EWPGLL APaT Ea PAM ETTF MWE4S NO M1B oLYNS w Ox,PIG,n1 .. DAM R M.Y . ..A"'"' MT E�3 P M 91E TTT Y AIO II1Nrt nM',NILMN 5 LµNE,FB. M mIMIC,a 91.4E V3P3 6.YL FIW4 SR YAIWM M . YIMEP � IL®rI9E w M ONEII .IY M IEWIIMC IOFNE .1 9. ONnRC'la 9W1 PBwm A S1RIR'TPM IET.INC Wl ®µ1 m,]co K . um� PNaEmsu B.uaEY ] 1 n. Au maNixn91 9W1 maw ro .mx sT.rz .IN dmAi PUEs .T ITETFME 111MK MIY,NIi 0.5OµNY FIIM.IYW SKIFY (IIICfS) U. P T9 M T 6 MY SMICMIE a PAH T.. A PRm RLLI. Ai W W. NLL BE RFpIN➢ a M 4NaA0E PRaf RNIN4 91NL Bf ..6WWd BY MM11419MY Ci S mHE1E PAffi NM IYLIMKWM BmC1Y6 NE VIRA 41dM9O1 NO AECIIa 66 lE B@pfpi hti1K VrY1TNY MFAS (f PILIE 9WL E PLAMlO A.9 IEm' P.mr K 9Eam IEPOI. N MBNMwIi W1WAL Rt® EIFId R{M6 NO SIIEEI a PMYIIL NFK 9W1 E lMIL1ED N A6TWM4 NM M 99iID R101i .cram As olveo x YYwr zlms Aw M MN>Flwlrs N M aosorPr Ex� Bm. la EW., YArFF.LWT RA.®x M 91EAN r.p SIRIIS a P. M Sv416E OCMK,EY x AO.]J9NIS NM IEY.YwQ,S n M MCNMY IXMPMINN 1 AS nnllBD N YPIr V. &osion Control Norm 1. iT fp.F NLL BE MS,NIL➢ YlµlO 91E N /iL RL NSAS Nm Ipa11N5 N[11E IT. W11EA NM6] YAY IFAK M 91E PIUO'11C MY EfAMI{N/O]VSIFYfnP' A.Y.EES L NYi OMTICINN [x RAK 1LL WE NS,Illro Al YL Co61NRlIa L X.. . dma m.W M WIa11Cla-9µu A4911E m-NLY = l WIIR/LINI 9.ILL NSTML 1FYWNY NfT PIBIRCIYN (MILD a Eu.YYEI.n ].M].o ALL fAlw NA91 w.R P.E,S »,LClfn B+,NB mIEIN.�11N. L MS WM . MFAR Kln® EME ro MBMKIK11—'MI —T s: 161pFp . sm My W 9n. NXO PEw1 9MI4f - K . IPM/ YIIM S ] W NNEIY. 6 tlYISrRIIC1YN L M MEAS NM 4QE a ]1 W 9L.tA a(SIp4ATa sm ]CO a mom rsa Nzncr N NMmcn ]. 0 6 B�ME M�@E6 KYN rK m�RLKrm wi•PF[ aP sn ..o C 9] lW ME NOT FOR CONMUMON P'C♦Ewwr¢ Ixc SExEBCY PAT UEYE T.PMw, MNssw.+lu k. {.lW— UUMD PBSPEIiIES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 EUbBB ups, WWI WI Wd N� rrBi PHASE TWO GRADING DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN IsY ]Sill-01'tJ0 ♦!TI- C4 F C WOOTR.O.W. TO ONIFA A°OIi CdASfT�IL'IpH Rom At NO .�•.� �I w �•un, \ H4RIXF 121YaL10. )IM �FpRLIwG zl 3F1A5 an.RooaIRlLn )�) •T..RY°r 'B040pp1P°') R igry LM[1 •�ro°r 1W.tW MTOTK pJVSE ONE TOTAL a N n Im m --------------- : OVERALL SITE PLAN -PHASE TWO a V p ASE ONE SITE DATA �z 1' = 5d I y QmTN ow+w ZO"` o�Rwc STORM WATE�POND SEE CNIL D 7oV0 SDE,w Eim PHASEE m.w L�a.w� Ql�� Qawo rlI1C Q°�pn >3 M RAw 6J• 9R vwRN Q10•p° Wli' a wMn' •art SIW pp 9Q �RIw •1°• VYQ vATl92 v� Ul!� IWrt mRw• .Q.r ..wow AtN .Q• MIp]rIPD-M ..Q}° Gww3• F1N };J.Q(S Q ills IJN.. qE.R� • j N.ImM 9 f1A4 aRQbJ �, ♦ RR.°LU tlRM4E l`IEIOTK cIF '�I �M II�. 1111\111110 ', �T IIL II II 1I Illl�ttYT 11I'11111 I-I�. Z � - � N xao1 /N 11 1 I I �I l l l l l l l l i j LLLLL LL . LLLLWJJ�J� m t, Isww. I �iLlr1 JJ t T 11 ry... tk11 luvro -�'— POWERS BLVD. ' !STORM WATER POND SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS _ err J.Re° ss. INNLL �°•• A1LL }Hli .NQM 9.6i �wwyQ 9tl i 011111PROPERTIES POWers Crossing Professional Center clay sR—_ Set 4-01-09 OVERALL PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO SITE PLANS Y.rRw. QYY.we1 °Nw I YQryYYI�IWy #7Yh.l„ Iv Yitl W ir�YYtlR•a Y r r.m hiY\ lAnmtl° YwY Rw WY w L 2 A Non -Scannable Item Item , E' Description Folder Number "I Folder Name �' , l �� Job Number 2 3 2 2 Box dumber f)D � � _ � �� \�\ Z Thomas J. Campbell Roger N. Knutson Thomas M. Scott Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehlcr Soren M. Mattick John F. Kelly Henry A. Schaeffer, III Alina Schwartz Samuel J. Edmunds Marguerite M. McCarron 1380 Corporate Center Curve Suite 317 • Eagan, MN 55121 651-452-5000 Fax 651-452-5550 www.ck-law.com CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Direct Dial. (651) 234-6222 E-mai[Addreas: snelson®ck-law.cmn September 22, 2009 RECEIVED Ms. Kim Meuwissen SEP 2 3 2009 City of Chanhassen CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanbassen, Minnesota 55317 RE: CHANHASSEN—MISC. RECORDED DOCUMENTS ➢ CUP #2009-06 — Powers Crossing Professional Center (Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition) Dear Kim: Enclosed for the City's files please find original recorded CUP #2009-06 concerning the Powers Crossing Profession Center phase two office building/parking ramp construction, which was recorded with the County on July 22, 2009 as Abstract Document No. A504766. Regards, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association S san R.Nelson, Lega Assistant SRN:ms Enclosure SCANNED Document No. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER A 604766 CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Fee $46 00 Certified Recorded on 7/22/2009 VII�NIMIY� CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #09-06 &r Receipt# at 01:15 ❑AMOPM Carl VV Ha so , Jr. County Record r 1. Permit. Subject to the terns and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for the following use: Conditional Use Permit with Variances to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor for the Powers Crossing Professional Center including a subdivision of the land and site plan approval for a two- phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office building, and up to a 731- stall, five -level parking ramp. 2. Property. The permit is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as follows: Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition 3. Conditions. The permit is issued for Powers Crossing Professional Center, with the following conditions: a. The property line may be revised to incorporate the reconveyed property from MnDOT to the developer. b. The developer shall is encouraged to meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines (MSBG). c. To mitigate for the effects of development within the primary corridor, the developer should be required encouraged to meet green construction standards for the whole site. SCANNED N d. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. e. Evaluate other site designs, stormwater management techniques and low -impact development practices for their benefit in reducing impacts to the primary and secondary zones of the Bluff Creek Overlay District. f. Reforest those areas disturbed to grade the site but do not have structures on them. The reforestation should be done with deciduous tree species representative of the existing species composition. The forested areas are dominated by bur oak. g. Maintain the natural drainage patterns. h. The applicant must clearly illustrate how impacts to the primary zone are to be mitigated. This mitigation must consider all benefits derived from the primary zone as described in Article XXXI of the Chanhassen City Code. i. The area east of Lot 1 within Outlot A within the primary corridor of Bluff Creek shall be covered by a conservation easement. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. Any wetland mitigation activities that are required within this area shall have final approval by City staff. No additional activities shall be allowed within this area and access to the mitigation site shall be the existing path. j. The wooded areas of Lot 1 and Outlot B within the Bluff Creek primary zone shall be covered by a conservation easement that restricts specific activities and prohibits any further development within the area. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: May 26, 2009 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA (ss COUNTY OF CARVER CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Tom Furlong, Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this�'J' day of , �uK-e—, 2009, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 T NOTARIY PUBLIC KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public -Minnesota MY Comm�saion E�Ires Jan 31, 2010 gAplan\2009 planning cases\09-06 powers crossing professional center\cup.doc 3 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of United Properties, LLC, and Timothy & Dawne Erhart for the following: • Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; • Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional, OI; • Subdivision into one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-of-way; • Site Plan Review with Variances for Powers Crossing Professional Center, a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot medical center, and a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp; and • Sign Variance On May 5, 2009, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of United Properties, LLC, and Timothy & Dawne Erhart for Powers Crossing Professional Center — Planning Case 09-06. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District, A2. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential — Low Density uses. The legal description of the property is Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota. 4. Rezoning: a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed use is compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c. The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance with the granting of a variance for the setbacks and building height. d. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. feMNED e. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property, subject to the installation of the turn lanes and traffic signal. 5. Conditional Use Permits: a. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. b. The proposed use will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and the zoning ordinance. c. The proposed use will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. The proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. The proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. f. The proposed use will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The proposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. h. The proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. The proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. j. The proposed use will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. The proposed use will not depreciate surrounding property values. 6. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. 7. Site Plan: a. The proposed development is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. The proposed development is consistent with the site plan review requirements; c. The proposed development preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; d. The proposed development creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e. The proposed development creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1) An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2) The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3) Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4) Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f. Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 8. Variances: a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Due to the topography of the site, the construction of 3 the storm water pond in the primary zone is a reasonable request. The need for the variances is due to the type and function of building. This site is intended as a gateway location for the City. As such, it requires a significant site presence. To do this with a one or two story structure would not provide the same impact as a taller building and would require even greater encroachment in to the Bluff Creek Primary zone. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification because of the site location and prominence as well as the topography of the property. c. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but to permit an appropriate scale development due to site location and prominence and to locate the storm water pond in a logical location on the site. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship, but is due to site topography, site location and prominence. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. I. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. 9. The City Council, upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, may grant a variance from the requirement of the sign ordinance where it is shown that by reason of topography or other conditions, strict compliance with the requirements of this ordinance would cause a hardship; provided that a variance may be granted only if the variance does not adversely affect the spirit or intent of this ordinance. The need for the variance is because this site is intended as a gateway for the City. As such, it requires a significant site presence including signage that is more consistent with its highway entrance location. 10. The planning report #09-06, dated May 5, 2009, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit with Variances, Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office and Institutional District, OI, Preliminary Plat approval, Site Plan Approval with Variances, and Sign Variance for the Powers Crossing Professional Center project — Planning Case 09-06. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 5`s day of May, 2009. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION i BY: Its Chairman Cn-O-1 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, de ending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for an after -the -fact Variance to place a dock on property zoned Sin le Family Residential, RSF Applicant: Gary Bhojwani Property 3301 Shore Drive Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, tF� Chair will lead the public hearing through the following step : What Happens 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City s projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/sere/olan/09-07.htmi. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Terry Questions & Jeffery by email at tiefferv@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone Comments: at 952-227-1168. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be ratified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process- The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or parry the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciaVindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested pemon(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be induced in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the ratification. SCANNED ..7n— N -V... L�YXY,6 R *TO VE .SO fk py„lfl V�ted ��tt t �� as Al a � �� .a in vrious city, 7p�,Q'� \\"NN`\ .ne area shown, and Is tc�S \\\��noes not warrant that the Geog °� \\�� prepare this map are error free, and the Ci, meta can be used for navigational, tracking or � any olt, \ `�," ..,.g measurement of distance or direction or precision in the c ...ynic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact : . iu7. The preceding disclaimer Is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 5.od.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend. indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, Its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. -' ii'._�: <k:s"p.:_4� M i..ii.J r e CITY OF CRANHAS 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 anhassen, Minnesota 55317 v.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 049JB2036654 $ 00.420 u v 05J07l2009 Mailed From 55317 US POSTAGE 7 ESTATE OF HARRY/LOUISE AHRENS 178 SPRING LAKES PKWY INGRAM, TX 78025-4408 Ilnrlinlillr nrrlr lrlrinln lrli rllln rin lrin rllulr lr nil SCANNED S.Sa1700147 c:n - c -7 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evenin , depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for an after -the -fact Variance to place a dock on property zoned Sin le Family Residential, RSF Applicant: Gary Bho'wani Property 3301 Shore Drive Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following What Happens steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/09-07.htmI. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Terry Questions & Jeffery by email at tieffery fti.chanhassen.mmus or by Comments: phone at 952-227-1168. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses. Wetland Alienations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested parry is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all perdnem information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciaUndusbial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. SCANNED Pam- sue" as Vps 07 O 28' \", This map Is,n, ..0 is not Intended to be used as one. This n 0, .,uatlon and data located in various city, county, sta, -.er sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used -,es only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Inforn A, .,, (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not r- -..ent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision In the deplcdon of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User. Its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the users access or use of data provided. 1. 5 53,1700] v OF 'JnA (i3jo9 et Boulevard Minnesota 55317 ssen.mn.us 049JB2036654 $ 00.420 n OS/07/2009 Mailed From 55317 US POSTAGE HERBERT J & PATRICIA L PFEFFER 2850 TANAGERS LN EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-7830 �,��u�i�u illnillunitlu,Ilnluillilln,ilil, Iln,Iln it SCANNED Affidavit of Publication CITY OF ARVER HANNNEPIN CARVER & HENNEPIN Southwest Newspapers COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARING. PLANNING CASE NO.09-06 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN State of Minnesota) that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public )SS. hearing on Tuesday, May 5,2009, at County of Carver ) 7:00 P.M. in the the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for a Conditional Use Permit with Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized Variances for development vision the Bluff Creek Corridor, Subdivision agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- into one lot, two outlets and er la knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: g g and has full dedication of public rightof-way; Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal (A2)toOfflce/Institmional(OD, Site newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as Plan Review with Variances for a amended. two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -fact medical center, up to a (B)'fbe notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. a-a6l 731-stall, five -level parking ramp and signage on property located on printed public was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit Said notice was cut from the columns of (southeast corner of Powers the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both Boulevard and Highway 312) - inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition POWERS CROSSING and publication of the Notice: PROFESSIONAL CENTER. Applicant: UnitedProperties,LLC/ abodefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz Timothy & Dawne Erhart. A plan showing the location the is available for public /t proposal review on the City's web site at G/ i7 ✓ii�Lr / l.�"' "1� j6_ www.ci.chanha5sea.mn.us/servZ plan/09-06.html or at City Hall Laurie A. Hartmapu during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and Subscribed and swom before me on express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, Senior Planner I bgenerous@ci.chanhassemm�aus this�fdayof 2009 Phone: 952-227-1131 (Published in the Chanhassen JYMME J. BARK VillageronThursday,April23;20M. No. 4200) r NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA My Commission Expires Ot/31/2013 N he RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximmn rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.43 per column inch SCANNED 0`!—C)(, CITY OF CHONSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Boa 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax:952227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone:952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952,227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952,227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci,chanhasseamn.us June 5, 2009 Mr. Bill Katter United Properties, LLC 3500 American Boulevard West Minneapolis, MN 55431 Re: Powers Crossing Professional Center — Planning Case #09-06 Dear Mr. Katter: This letter is to confirm that on May 26, 2009, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: A. "Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional District, OI." Please note that the rezoning of the parcel is only effective with the final platting of the subdivision. B. "Conditional Use Permit with Variances to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; subject to the following conditions: 1. The property line may be revised to incorporate the reconveyed property from MnDOT to the developer. 2. The developer shall is encouraged to meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines (MSBG). 3. To mitigate for the effects of development within the primary corridor, the developer should be required encouraged to meet green construction standards for the whole site. 4. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. Chanhassen is a Community for Life. Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 2 of 11 5. Evaluate other site designs, stormwater management techniques and low -impact development practices for their benefit in reducing impacts to the primary and secondary zones of the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 6. Reforest those areas disturbed to grade the site but do not have structures on them. The reforestation should be done with deciduous tree species representative of the existing species composition. The forested areas are dominated by bur oak. 7. Maintain the natural drainage patterns. 8. The applicant must clearly illustrate how impacts to the primary zone are to be mitigated. This mitigation must consider all benefits derived from the primary zone as described in Article XXXI of the Chanhassen City Code. 9. The area east of Lot 1 within Outlot A within the primary corridor of Bluff Creek shall be covered by a conservation easement. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. Any wetland mitigation activities that are required within this area shall have final approval by City staff. No additional activities shall be allowed within this area and access to the mitigation site shall be the existing path. 10. The wooded areas of Lot 1 and Outlot B within the Bluff Creek primary zone shall be covered by a conservation easement that restricts specific activities and prohibits any further development within the area." C. "Subdivision (Preliminary Plat) creating one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right- of-way, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall either dedicate/donate an Outlot or record a conservation easement containing the Bluff Creek Primary zone north of the road right-of-way in Outlot A. This area of Outlot A is undevelopable and the land within the conservation easement could not be used in future phases for density transfer purposes. A conservation easement shall be recorded over the Bluff Creek Primary zone located within Lot I and Outlot B. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. The easement shall be recorded Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 3 of 11 with the first phase of the development. 2. Submit proposed names for street labeled "Access Road" on plans for approval. 3. The drainage report and plans must be revised to address comments from MnDOT. 4. The applicant must obtain a MnDOT drainage permit. 5. The drainage report and plans must be modified so that the peak discharge rate to the off - site wetland does not increase under fully developed conditions. 6. The plans must be revised to provide either an overland emergency overflow or an additional outlet control structure at a higher elevation. 7. The developer must submit a letter from an engineer stating that the retaining wall east of the building can accommodate temporary ponding behind the wall. 8. The alignment of the bypass storm sewer pipe must be redesigned to eliminate excess cover over the pipe. 9. If MnDOT allows a connection to the Highway 212 storm pipe, then show the existing pipe on the plan sheets. 10. Building permits are required for retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 11. A manhole must be installed at the terminus of the sanitary sewer. 12. All sanitary sewer and watermain within Lot 1, Block 1 shall be privately owned and maintained. 13. The storm sewer that will convey runoff from the drainageway to the east of the property shall also be privately owned and maintained, including those portions that lie within public right-of-way and the City owned outlot. 14. The 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement shown on the preliminary plat over this storm sewer must be deleted. Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 4 of 11 15. Delete the 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement for the future watermain. 16. Provide a temporary blanket drainage and utility easement — or similar mechanism acceptable to the City - over the proposed forcemain corridor. The temporary easement shall not encroach into the building envelope as shown on the site plan. 17. A permanent 20-foot wide easement will be required over the final forcemain alignment. 18. Each new lot will be subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. These fees will be collected with the building permit, subject to the rates in effect at the time of building permit, and shall be based on the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' SAC unit determination. 19. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 20. All public utility improvements will require a preconstruction meeting before building permit issuance. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required, including the MPCA, Department of Health, Carver County and Watershed District. 21. Upon project completion as -built drawings must be submitted for the private utilities. 22. The developer must ensure that all traffic study data is provided to Carver County for their review and must incorporate Carver County and MNDOT's comments into the plan. 23. An updated traffic study must be submitted with Phase 2 improvements. Powers Crossing's financial obligations with respect to the signal installation will be determined at that time and incorporated into the Site Plan Agreement for Phase 2. 24. A temporary roadway, drainage and utility easement must be provided over the cul-de- sac at the east end of the access road. 25. This property is subject to the Arterial Collector Fee which is $3,600 per developable acre. The acreage used in this calculation shall include the right-of-way tumback from Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 5 of 11 both Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. This fee shall be paid in cash with the final plat 26. The RIM and Flowage Easements need to be indicated on the plat. This should include the document number 10-05-87-1. 27. The wetland mitigation area in Outlot A needs to be created. A Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants needs to be executed and recorded with Carver County. This document number needs to be included on the plat. 28. The remaining conditions of approval for WAP #2006-32 need to be met: a. The plans shall be revised to show how M-1 will be accessed. The access route shall be stable, shall avoid damage to significant trees (greater than 10" DBH) and shall avoid impacts to natural drainageways and any jurisdictional wetlands that may exist on site that were not delineated by Westwood Professional Services in August 2006. b. A planting plan for M-1, including invasive vegetation management techniques, species to be planted, proposed planting rates, and the approach to upland buffer restoration, shall be submitted prior to final City Council approval. c. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit equal to 110% of the cost of the wetland creation (including grading and seeding) to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland are met. The letter of credit shall be effective for no less than five years from the date of final plat approval. The applicant shall submit a cost estimate for wetland creation (including grading and seeding) so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of credit. d. A five-year wetland replacement monitoring plan shall be submitted. The replacement monitoring plan shall include a detailed management plan for invasive non-native species, particularly hybrid cattail, purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. The plans shall show fixed photo monitoring points for the replacement wetland. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. 29. The legal wetland boundary of the RIM wetland was not delineated in the Westwood Wetland Delineation Report dated August of 2006. This boundary must be delineated and wetland impacts avoided where possible. Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 6 of 11 30. Because of the perpetual RIM and flowage easements the plans must be provided to the Natural Resources Conservation Service for review and comment. Any comments from the NRCS must be made available to the City. 31. Drainage to the RIM wetland from the south flows through a defined swale. The conveyance of this flow must be maintained under the proposed road extension. 32. Erosion Control plan needs to be updated per the July comments: a. Show a 75-foot rock construction entrance. b. Show rounding of comers for proposed grades. c. Erosion control blanket shall be shown on all slopes east of the proposed building and adjacent to the pond. d. An NPDES permit must be obtained prior to any site grading and a SWPPP must be provided to the City for review and comment. e. Replace MnDOT 340 mix with a modified BWSR U7 seed mix. 33. Estimated SWMP fees due at the time of final plat are $271,506.20. 34. The development must comply with Carver Soil and Water Conservation District comments. 35. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. 36. The following practices are required in order to insure the best chance of survival for the highlighted oaks to be preserved along the east side of the development: a. Understory trees near the oaks shall be preserved. b. Roots at the grading limits shall be cut cleanly with a trencher or vibratory plow. c. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed prior to any grading. d. Trees shall be thoroughly watered during dry periods. 37. The applicant shall install a second tier to the retaining wall at the north end of the east side of the development to preserve the grade surrounding the oaks proposed to be saved. Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 7 of 11 38. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall be in place and maintained until all construction is completed. 39. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans, dated 10/06/08, will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 40. All trees removed shall be chipped or hauled off site. No burning permits shall be issued. 41. The developer shall pay the full park dedication fee in force at the time of final plat approval and prior to recording. 42. Construction of the 10-ft. wide bituminous access road trail and the North Trail. The North Trail plans shall be modified dedicating a permanent 20-foot wide trail easement to allow for appropriate separation from adjoining improvements and boulevard areas for winter plowing, snow storage and aesthetics. 43. Dedication of a permanent triangular shaped trail easement at the South East comer of Lot 1, Block 1. The triangle shall be 50' in length on its South side and 200' in length on its East side. 44. The developer shall finance the cost or a portion of the 2010 MUSA trunk lift station and enter into an agreement with the City for repayment at the time of final plat." D. "Sits Plan with Variances for building height and Bluff Creek Primary Zone setbacks for Planning Case #08-16, for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office building, and up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp on Lot 1, Block 1 of the development, plans prepared by Pope Associates, Inc. and Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final plat for the development shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The full buildout is predicated upon a turnback to the land owner of MnDOT right-of- way. In the event that this tumback does not occur, the applicant may build a four-story building totaling 112,000 square feet subject to parking compliance with City Code. Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 8 of 11 3. The developer is encouraged to meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines, MSBG. 4. The developer shall continue the architectural detailing through the use of the three brick colors as well as the use of stone and metal on the garage structure. 5. The developer shall provide secure bicycle racks and/or storage (within 200 yards of a building entrance) for 5% or more of all building users (measured at peak periods), and provide shower and changing facilities in the building. The developer should also provide benches throughout the site as well as tables and chairs in the patio area. 6. The buildings are required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 7. The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 8. Accessible routes must be provided between commercial building(s), parking facilities and public transportation stops. 9. All parking areas, including parking structure, must be provided with accessible parking. 10. The developer shall comply with the minimum parking setback requirement and install appropriate berming and or landscaping to allow the 10 feet setback. 11. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 12. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. 13. The applicant shall install a second tier to the retaining wall at the north end of the east side of the development to preserve the grade surrounding the oaks proposed to be saved. Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 9 of 11 14. The applicant does not meet required landscape quantities for parking lot trees and islands/peninsulas in both phases. The applicant must meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees and landscape islands/peninsulas. 15. Phase I: The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for either of the bufferyard areas. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to meet minimum requirements. 16. Phase II: The applicant does not meet the minimum requirements for bufferyard areas. The applicant shall increase the plantings to meet minimum requirements. 17. The applicant must replace the Colorado spruce with other approved species in the plant schedule. 18. All transplanted materials must be pre -approved by the City. Transplanted trees will not be accepted if substituted without City approval. If approved for transplanting, the material must be warranted for a minimum of one year. If transplanted materials die, they must be replaced with nursery stock. 19. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall be in place and maintained until all construction is completed. 20. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans, dated 04/01109, will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 21. All trees removed shall be chipped or hauled off site. No burning permits shall be issued. 22. The North Trail plans or parking lot design shall be modified to allow for appropriate boulevard areas for winter plowing, snow storage and aesthetics. 23. A 3-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, and nothing shall be placed in front of the hydrant outlets, connections, fire protection control valves that would interfere with fire fighter operations. Section 5085 MN. Fire Code and Sec. 508.5.4. 24. No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be removed or chipped on site. Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 10 of 11 25. Contact the Chanhassen Fire Marshal for locations of "No Parking Fire Lane" signage, and locations of curbing to be painted yellow. MN Fire Code Sec. 503.3. 26. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. MSFC sec 501.4. 27. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. MSFC Sec. 503.2.3. 28. Due to the unknown timeframe associated with the signal installation, an updated traffic study must be submitted with Phase 2 improvements. Powers Crossing's financial obligations with respect to the signal installation will be determined at that time and incorporated into the Site Plan Agreement for Phase 2." and E. "A sign size Variance request to permit an eight (8) foot tall sign with up to 64 square feet of sign display area, subject to the following conditions: 1. Separate sign permits shall be required for each sign. 2. The development name in the monument sign shall be individual dimensioned letters with a minimum'/2-inch projection. 3. Only one monument sign shall be permitted for the Powers Crossing Professional Center site. 4. The sign height for the directional signs shall be reduced to five feet. The display area for sign #2 shall be reduced to four square feet. 5. The sign location shall meet all setback and site triangle requirements." Mr. Bill Katter Powers Crossing Professional Center June 5, 2009 Page 11 of 11 Final plat documents must be submitted to the City 30 days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Conditions of the preliminary plat approval must be addressed for final plat approval. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat approval. Also enclosed is a site plan agreement that must be executed by United Properties. Note that if there is a different property owner and/or mortgage holder on the property, they will need to sign the consent(s) at the end of the agreement. Return the agreement to me for City execution and recording at Carver County within 120 days of the final plat approval. The required security specified in the site plan agreement ($5,000.00) shall be submitted prior to the City issuing a building permit. A copy of the executed agreement will be returned for your files. The City may not issue a building permit for this project until the final plat documents and all required fees and security have been executed and submitted to the City. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincere] Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator c: Timothy A. & Dawne M. Erhart 9611 Meadowlark Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Enclosures gAplan\2009 planning case \09-06 powers crossing professional cen[er\appmval letterAm ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: 1. Submit three (3) sets of full size, 50 scale construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of l.m..nrnvementg: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading h. Street lights & signs i. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping 7. Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (81/2" x 11 "), and a digital copy in All format. B. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc format. 9. Lot tabulations Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Updated 11-29-06 gieng\forms\final plat submittalAm CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT # 09-06 POWERS CROSSING PROFESSIONAL CENTER SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated May 26, 2009, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and United Properties, LLC (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan with variances for building height for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office building, and up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp (referred to in this Permit as the "project"). The land is legally described as Lot 1, Block 1. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enter into this Permit and furnish the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A: Site Plan prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated 4/O1/09. Plan B: Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated 4/01/09. Plan C: Landscaping Plan prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated 4/01/09. Plan D: Utility Plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated 4/O1/09. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by October 1, 2011. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City_ If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $5,000.00 (boulevard restoration, erosion control and landscaping). If the Developer requests a Certificate of Occupancy prior to the installation of site landscaping, then the developer shall provide to the city a letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount sufficient to insure the installation of said landscaping. PROCEDURES FOR LETTER OF CREDIT REDUCTION a. Requests for reductions of Letters of Credit must be submitted to the City in writing by the Developer or his Engineer. b. Partial lien waivers totaling the amount of the requested reduction shall accompany each such request. c. Any reduction shall be subject to City approval. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Mr. Bill Katter United Properties, LLC 3500 American Boulevard West Minneapolis, MN 55431 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. City Council approves a site plan with variances for building height for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office building, and up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp subject to the following conditions: a. The final plat for the development shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. b. The full buildout is predicated upon a tumback to the landowner of MnDOT right-of- way. in the event that this tumback does not occur, the applicant may build a four-story building totaling 112,000 square feet subject to parking compliance with City Code. c. The developer is encouraged to meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (I ) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines, MSBG. d. The developer shall continue the architectural detailing through the use of the three brick colors as well as the use of stone and metal on the garage structure. e. The developer shall provide secure bicycle racks and/or storage (within 200 yards of a building entrance) for 5% or more of all building users (measured at peak periods), and provide shower and changing facilities in the building. The developer should also provide benches throughout the site as well as tables and chairs in the patio area. f. The buildings are required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. g. The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. h. Accessible routes must be provided between commercial building(s), parking facilities and public transportation stops. i. All parking areas, including parking structure, must be provided with accessible parking. j. The developer shall comply with the minimum parking setback requirement and install appropriate berming and or landscaping to allow the 10 feet setback. k. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 1. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. m. The applicant shall install a second tier to the retaining wall at the north end of the east side of the development to preserve the grade surrounding the oaks proposed to be saved. n. The applicant does not meet required landscape quantities for parking lot trees and islands/peninsulas in both phases. The applicant must meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees and landscape islands/peninsulas. o. Phase I: The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for either of the bufferyard areas. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to meet minimum requirements. p. Phase II: The applicant does not meet the minimum requirements for bufferyard areas. The applicant shall increase the plantings to meet minimum requirements. q. The applicant must replace the Colorado spruce with other approved species in the plant schedule. r. All transplanted materials must be pre -approved by the City. Transplanted trees will not be accepted if substituted without City approval. If approved for transplanting, the material must be warranted for a minimum of one year. If transplanted materials die, they must be replaced with nursery stock. s. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall be in place and maintained until all construction is completed. t. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans, dated 04/01/09, will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. u. All trees removed shall be chipped or hauled off site. No burning permits shall be issued. v. The North Trail plans or parking lot design shall be modified to allow for appropriate boulevard areas for winter plowing, snow storage and aesthetics. w. A 3-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, and nothing shall be placed in front of the hydrant outlets, connections, fire protection control valves that would interfere with fire fighter operations. MSFC Sec. 508.5 and Sec. 508.5.4. x. No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be removed or chipped on site. y. Contact the Chanhassen Fire Marshal for locations of "No Parking Fire Lane" signage, and locations of curbing to be painted yellow. MSFC Sec. 503.3. z. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. MSFC Sec. 501A. aa. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. MSFC Sec. 503.23. bb. Due to the unknown timeframe associated with the signal installation, an updated traffic study must be submitted with Phase 2 improvements. Powers Crossing's financial obligations with respect to the signal installation will be determined at that time and incorporated into the Site Plan Agreement for Phase 2. S. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein. 5 CITY OF CHANHASSEN LYE Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager UNITED PROPERTIES, LLC W Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this —day of , 2009, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2009 by , the Developer. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 NOTARY PUBLIC ri CirY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT E3CHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITION 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, and 3) the City has issued a building permit in reliance on the foregoing conditions having been satisfied. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developers expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developers and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post a letter of credit or cash escrow to the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. 7 7. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attomeys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attomeys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. S. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on -site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occunancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recordine. This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every 3 right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the site plan the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. 0 CONSENT Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this _ day of 2009 By STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2009, by DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 NOTARY PUBLIC 10 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO SITE PLAN AGREEMENT which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Agreement, agrees that the Site Plan Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of 2009. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_,by DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 NOTARY PUBLIC 11 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FAX (952) 227-1110 TO: Campbell Knutson, PA 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE JOB NO. 6/15/09 09-06 ATTENTION Sue Nelson RE: Document Recording ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Request ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 5/26/09 09-06 Conditional Use Permit 09-06 for Powers Crossing Professional Center THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return M For Recording ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO: Bill Katter, United Properties,LLC Timothy & Dawne Erhart SIGNED: copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints SCANNED If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #09-06 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for the following use: Conditional Use Permit with Variances to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor for the Powers Crossing Professional Center including a subdivision of the land and site plan approval for a two- phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office building, and up to a 731- stall, five -level parking ramp. 2. Property. The perndt is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as follows: Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition 3. Conditions. The permit is issued for Powers Crossing Professional Center, with the following conditions: a. The property line may be revised to incorporate the reconveyed property from MnDOT to the developer. b. The developer shall is encouraged to meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines (MSBG). c. To mitigate for the effects of development within the primary corridor, the developer should be required encouraged to meet green construction standards for the whole site. Q30AA34 d. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. e. Evaluate other site designs, stormwater management techniques and low -impact development practices for their benefit in reducing impacts to the primary and secondary zones of the Bluff Creek Overlay District. f. Reforest those areas disturbed to grade the site but do not have structures on them. The reforestation should be done with deciduous tree species representative of the existing species composition. The forested areas are dominated by bur oak. g. Maintain the natural drainage patterns. h. The applicant must clearly illustrate how impacts to the primary zone are to be mitigated. This mitigation must consider all benefits derived from the primary zone as described in Article XXXI of the Chanhassen City Code. i. The area east of Lot 1 within Outlot A within the primary corridor of Bluff Creek shall be covered by a conservation easement. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. Any wetland mitigation activities that are required within this area shall have final approval by City staff. No additional activities shall be allowed within this area and access to the mitigation site shall be the existing path. j. The wooded areas of Lot 1 and Outlot B within the Bluff Creek primary zone shall be covered by a conservation easement that restricts specific activities and prohibits any further development within the area. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: May 26, 2009 (SEAL) STATE OF M1NNESOTA (ss COUNTY OF CARVER CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: ILI Tom Furlong, Mayor AND: N To d Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisl�day of a V t- , 2009, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 PUBLIC KIM T. MEUWISSEN 0 "Notary Public -Minnesota MY CWvn" n F�iras Jan 31, 2010 gAplan\2009 planning cases\09-06 powers crossing professional center\cup.doc 3 CITY OF 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 A&nkk ft Phone:952.227.1100 Fax: 952.2271110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952,227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone:952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park 8 Remation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Reaeation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning 8 Ilaknal Resources Phone:952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Pudic Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952,227.1110 Web Site www.a.chanhassen.mn.us I 1 i7lT lu TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: May 26, 2009 SUBJ: Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case #09-06 PROPOSED MOTIONS "A. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional District, OI." B. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit with Variances to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; subject to conditions 1 through 10 on page 36 of the report." C. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Subdivision (Preliminary Plat) creating one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-of-way, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to conditions 1 through 46 on pages 37-41 of the report" D. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Site Plan with Variances for building height and Bluff Creek Primary Zone setbacks for Planning Case #09- 06, for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office center, and up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp on Lot 1, Block 1 of the development, plans prepared by Pope Associates, Inc. and Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to conditions I through 29 on pages 4143 of the report." And, E. "The Chanhassen City Council approves a sign size Variance request to permit an eight (8) foot tall sign with up to 64 square feet of sign display area, subject to conditions 1 through 5 on page 43 of the report." The Chanhassen City Council adopts the attached Planning Commission's findings of fact. City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED Todd Gerhardt Powers Crossing Professional Center May 26, 2009 Page 2 of 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is proposing to build a three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office center in two phases at the southeast corner of Minnesota Trunk Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. At build out, up to a five -story parking ramp would also be constructed on the site. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 5, 2009 to review the proposed project. The Planning Commission voted unanimously, 6 for and 0 against, approving the motions approving the project. The Planning Commission had no objections or issues with the project. Staff met with the applicant on May 14, 2009, to review the conditions of approval. Based on that meeting and further review by the City, staff is proposing modification of the conditions as follows: B. Conditional Use Permit. 2. The developer shall is encouraged to meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEER) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines (MSBG). 3. To mitigate for the effects of development within the primary corridor, the developer should be required encouraged to meet green construction standards for the whole site. C. Subdivision 2. The developer shall either dedicate/donate an Outlot or record a conservation easement containing the Bluff Creek Primary zone north of the road right-of-way in Outlot A. This area of Outlot A is undevelopable and the land within the conservation easement shall not be used in future phases for density transfer purposes. A conservation easement shall be recorded over the Bluff Creek Primary zone located within Lot 1 and Outlot B. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. The easement shall be recorded with the first phase of the development. 17. Provide a temporary blanket drainage and utility easement - or similar mechanism acceptable to the City- over the proposed forcemain corridor. The temporary easement shall not encroach into the building envelope as shown on the site plan. Todd Gerhardt Powers Crossing Professional Center May 26, 2009 Page 3 of 3 23. improvements. The developer must ensure that all traffic study data is provided to Carver County for their review and must incorporate Carver County and MNDOT's comments into the plan. 25. The .le el,.POFfflliSt pa�sash fee with the final plat to P.Rypr tl.e st of the traffi.. signal. An updated traffic study must be submitted with Phase 2 improvements. Powers Crossing's financial obligations with respect to the signal installation will be determined at that time and incorporated into the Site Plan Agreement for Phase 2. 46. The developer shall finance the cost of the 2010 MUSA trunk lift station and enter into an agreement with the City for repayment. D. Site Plan 3. The developer shall is encouraged to meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines, MSBG. 29. An updated traffic study must be submitted with Phase 2 improvements. Powers Crossing's financial obligations with respect to the signal installation will be determined at that time and incorporated into the Site Plan Agreement for Phase 2. The Planning Commission minutes for May 5, 2009, are item la of the May 26, 2009, City Council agenda packet. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the motions as specified on pages 35 - 43 in the staff report dated May 5, 2009 approving Powers Crossing Professional Center. ATTACHMENTS Revised Planning Commission Staff Report Dated May 5, 2009. gAplan\2009 planning cases\09-06 powers crossing professional cen[er\executive summary.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTIONS: PC DATE: May 5, 2009 CC DATE: May 26, 2009 REVIEW DEADLINE: June 1, 2009 CASE #: 09-06 BY: AF, RG, TH, TJ, ML, JM, JS A. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional District, Ol." B. "The Chanhassen Phmniiag Commission feeAmmmds City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit with Variances to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; subject to conditions 1 through 10 on page 36." C. "The Chanhassen Planning Geffmfiissien feeemmends City Council approves the Subdivision (Preliminary Plat) creating one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-of- way, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to conditions 1 through 46 on pages 37-41." D. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Site Plan with Variances for building height and Bluff Creek Primary Zone setbacks for Planning Case #09-06, for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office center, and up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp on Lot 1, Block 1 of the development, plans prepared by Pope Associates, Inc. and Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to conditions 1 through 29 on pages 41-43." And, E. "The Chanhassen City Council approves a sign size Variance request to permit an eight (8) foot tall sign with up to 64 square feet of sign display area, subject to conditions 1 through 5 on page 43." The Planning Geffh-Mssien City Council also adopts the attached findings of fact and- meemmendations. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: POWERS CROSSING PROFESSIONAL CENTER The developer is requesting the following: • Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; • Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional, OI; • Subdivision into one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-of-way; F2] Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 2 of 44 Site Plan with Variances for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office center, and a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp; and • Signage Variance. LOCATION: APPLICANT: Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition (southeast comer of Powers Boulevard/CSAH 17 and Highway 212) United Properties, LLC 3500 American Boulevard West Minneapolis, MN 55431 (952)837-8525 Attn: William Katter william.katter@uproperties.com Timothy & Dawne Erhart 9611 Meadowlark Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 PRESENT ZONING: Agricultural Estate District, A2 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Office and Residential — Low Density (net density 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 116.88 acres DENSITY: F.A.R. 0.36 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 3 of 44 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is proposing to build a three-story professional office center southeast of the intersection of Minnesota Trunk Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. The facility is intended to be constructed in two phases with a total of 160,000 finished square feet. At build out, up to a five -story parking ramp would be constructed on the site. The full build out is contingent upon a tumback to the land owner of MnDOT right-of-way. In the event that this tumback does not occur, the applicant has requested to be allowed to add a fourth -story to the first phase building for a total of 112,000 square feet. The applicant intends to get all their preliminary approvals in place so that they can begin construction when the market can support the development. The site is located within the Bluff Creek Overlay District (District). This district was created in 1998 based upon the findings and recommendations of the 1996 Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources and Management Plan. The district was intended to have several functions. The primary function of the district is to protect the geomorphology and hydrology of Bluff Creek, a 303d listed impaired water, and to preserve the natural corridor from the Minnesota River Valley to Lake Minnewashta Regional Park for aesthetic, recreational, surface water and wildlife benefits. In reviewing the proposed project, there are two major issues that need to be addressed: The background, vision and rules governing and the impact of the proposed development on the Bluff Creek corridor, including the location of the building, the encroachment into the primary zone, and any necessary or appropriate mitigation, which will be reviewed in the conditional use permit discussion. The impacts of the development on infrastructure, especially traffic, which is reviewed as part of the subdivision and site plan. The applicant is requesting a subdivision of the property and a site plan review to permit the development of a professional office on the westerly portion of the property, and to provide access and utilities for the future development of the eastern portion of the property. The property surrounding this site is zoned Agricultural Estate District, A2, and is located in the next area of urban services expansion for the City. To the north is the eastbound ramp to Highway 212, a passive park area purchased by the City in 1998, the southern portions of the Wilson nursery property, and two single- family homes on larger lots. To the east is Highway 101, across which is Bandimere Community Park and single-family homes. To the south are single-family homes on large lots, which are zoned Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 4 of 44 Rural Residential, RR. West across Powers Boulevard is a cultivated farm field and wetlands that is guided for Office use. Water service was provided to the site in conjunction with the Highway 212 project. The water extension was expedited to avoid the necessity of having to retrofit a water line under the new highway and along Powers Boulevard. Sewer service is being provided in conjunction with City Project #08-09, which is anticipated for approval in 2009. This sewer project includes a lift station located south of the local street connection to Powers Boulevard which will serve all the land in the City south of Highway 212 currently not connected to City sewer, and a force main from the lift station to Lyman Boulevard. The portion of the site proposed for development is limited to the extreme western quarter of the property. Portions of this area are part of the Bluff Creek corridor primary zone. A created wetland and proposed wetland mitigation area are located in the eastern portion of the development area. A ridge line, with a high elevation of approximately 924, divides the western development area from the eastern development area. A wooded area runs from the northeast to the southwest across this portion of the site. The site generally slopes from the north and east to the southwest with a low elevation of 868. An existing stormwater pond is located in the west central portion of the site. This pond is proposed to be relocated to the south of the new public street. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed development with modifications and subject to the conditions contained within the staff report. APPLICABLE REGUATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article 11, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article IV, Division 2, Conditional Use Permits Chapter 20, Article VI, Wetland Protection Chapter 20, Article XXI, -or, Office and Institutional District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and Office - Institutional Developments Chapter 20, Article XXIV, Off -Street Parking and Loading Chapter 20, Article XXV, Landscaping and Tree Removal Chapter 20, Article XXVI, Signs Chapter 20, Article XXXI, Bluff Creek Overlay District Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 5 of 44 As part of the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the City approved a Land Use amendment of the westerly 10 acres of the property from Residential -Low Density to Office. This site also represents a significant gateway into our community. As such, it is anticipated that the development be a higher caliber and grander scale than other development in the OI district. This area is separated by both topography and vegetation from the remainder of the parcel to the east. It is anticipated that the remainder of the site will develop with a mix of housing types that maintain the 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre net density. On October 23, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved Wetland Alteration Permit #06-32 for the construction of an access road and stormwater pond. The wetland mitigation for this is located just east of the proposed Lot 1 and north of the large wetland complex. In 2006, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) constructed an extension of Powers Boulevard from Lyman Boulevard to Pioneer Trail in conjunction with the Trunk Highway 212 project. Future development within the City requires a lift station south of TH 212 and north of Pioneer Trail along Powers Boulevard. In addition, the TH 212 project needed to provide access to properties south of TH 212, west and east of the Powers Boulevard extension. Due to Carver County's requirements for separation of access points onto a county road, the curb cut to access the Erhart property was located adjacent to an existing wetland. The applicant proposed the construction of a 31-foot wide street to provide access to the western portion of the property, in addition to the future City lift station. In conjunction with the access point and lift station location, the property owner requested and received a wetland alteration permit (Planning Case #06-32) in 2006. The wetland mitigation required of the permit has not been completed. On July 10, 1995, the City Council approved the preliminary and final plat of Butternut Ridge Addition, Subdivision #95-9, creating one lot and one outlot. This subdivision permitted the property owner to sell the 2%-acre home site on the property and keep the balance of the site for the owner's personal use and future development. The property owner still owns the home on the property. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 6 of 44 REZONING While the development had originally been contemplated as a planned unit development (PUD), staff felt that Office & Institutional (Ol) zoning with a variance request was more appropriate for the site since only one lot was being developed. The OI district is a limited use district that permits health servicesthospitals, offices and cultural type uses. These uses will be compatible with the existing and future residential development to the east and south and the future office use to the west across Powers Boulevard. The proposed zoning classification is consistent with the office land use designation of the northwesterly ten acres of the property, which approved as part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan update. Initially, the City had been considering amending only the westerly three acres to Office use. These three acres included the more open area of the site at the base of the slope separating the western portion of the property from the eastern portion. However as part of the Comprehensive Plan update process, a total of ten acres was included in the land use amendment to facilitate the development of the site as a gateway to the community. The balance of the property remains guided residential —low density and will maintain its Agricultural Estate District (A2) zoning until it is proposed for development. ARTICLE XXI. "OP' OFFICE AND INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT Sec. 20-791. Intent. The intent of the "OP' District is to provide for public or quasi -public nonprofit uses and professional business and administrative offices. See. 20-792. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in an "OP' District: (1) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (2) Community center. (3) Churches. (4) Fire station. (5) Funeral homes. (6) Health services/hospitals. (7) Library. (8) Museum. (9) Nursing homes. (10)Offices. (I I)Post office. (12)Public parks/open space. (13)Public recreational facilities. (14)Schools. (15)Utility services. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 7 of 44 Sec. 20-793. Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in the "OP' District: (1) Parking lots. (2) Signs. (3) Temporary outdoor sales (subject to the requirements of section 20-312). Sec. 20-794. Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in the "OP District: (1) Adaptive reuse of vacant public or private school buildings for private business uses. (2) Commercial towers as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. Sec. 20-795. Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an "OP' District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter: (1) The minimum lot area is 15,000 square feet. (2) The minimum lot frontage is 75 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac shall have a minimum lot frontage of 60 feet. (3) The minimum lot depth is 150 feet. (4) The maximum lot coverage is 65 percent. (5) Off-street parking shall comply with district setback requirements except: a. There is no minimum setback when it abuts a railroad right-of-way, except as provided in chapter 20, article XXV, division 3 pertaining to landscaping requirements. b. There is no minimum setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off-street parking area. c. The minimum setback is 50 feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. d. The minimum setback is 25 feet for side street side yards. (6) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, two stories. b. For accessory structures, one story. (7) Minimum setback requirements: a. For front yards, 35 feet. b. For rear yards, 30 feet. c. For side yards, 15 feet. d. The minimum setback is 50 feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 8 of 44 Sec. 20-796. Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "OP' District: (1) Temporary classroom structures for use by public or private schools needed for temporary use. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT Development within the Bluff Creek corridor requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit. As part of this specific development request, the applicant is requesting a variance from the primary zone boundary to encroach into the primary zone for the development of the project, including buildings, grading, parking and driveway, stormwater ponding and the proposed wetland mitigation area. The Bluff Creek Primary Zone encompasses approximately the westerly 20 percent of the property. Bluff Creek is entirely within the City of Chanhassen. It provides a unique blend of habitat, vegetation and recreational opportunities through the center of the City. The corridor encompasses all of the land which drains to Bluff Creek. In December 1996, the City of Chanhassen adopted the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan (BCWNRMP). The plan was the culmination of several years of study and planning focused on protecting the natural and recreational resources provided by the Bluff Creek corridor. The BCWNRMP recommended the establishment of a primary zone (the creek, riparian wetlands, associated steep slopes, native vegetation) and a secondary zone (other undeveloped portions of Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 9 of 44 the watershed) as a tool to help protect the creek's natural resources. The primary and secondary zones were mapped at that time using aerial photography to provide staff and the public with a general idea of where the zones would lie. The City of Chanhassen established the Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOD) by ordinance in 1998. The BCOD was modified on this property to remove that portion impacted by grading north of the pond and that portion impacted by the construction of TH 212. Even with this modification of the BCOD, a significant portion of the property remains encumbered by the BCOD. The primary zone includes the forested area of the site and the wetlands contained therein, which included the wetland that was filled as part of the approved wetland alteration permit in 2006. If granted, this will be the first variance of this type within the Bluff Creek Overlay District in this area. Decisions made regarding this development may set a precedent for future developments. The Bluff Creek Overlay District was intended to preserve the natural corridor along Bluff Creek for aesthetic, recreational, wildlife and water quality functions. As Section 20-1551 of the City Code states, "significant natural features should impact development rather than development impacting significant natural features." Bluff Creek is a 303d-listed water with turbidity and fish IBI impairments. It is known to have significant erosion and sediment issues resulting from the increase in surface water discharge volumes to the creek. Currently, the City and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency are Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 10 of 44 conducting a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Study. This study will result in further recommendations to protect Bluff Creek. The Bluff Creek Overlay District was intended, in part, to guide development to minimize the increases in hardscape that accompany development by creatively designing site plans to reduce impervious surface and save significant natural resources. Because of the need to define the underlying causes of the erosion within Bluff Creek, the Bluff Creek Corridor Feasibility Study was undertaken. This study identified 22 severely eroded gullies and escarpments just in the lower valley alone downstream of the proposed development. Figure 3. Bluff Creek erosion issues downstream of proposed development Properties within the Bluff Creek Overlay District are subject to the following requirements: A conditional use permit is required prior to all subdivisions, site plans, land alteration and building within the BCOD. 2. Bluffs must be preserved as set forth in Article XXVIH of City Code. 3. Density transfers can be used to cluster development in areas where the location of the primary zone makes portions of the site unsuitable for development. 4. Natural habitat areas within the primary zone must be preserved as open space. 5. The primary zone must be 100 percent open space. 6. All structures must be set back at least 40 feet from the primary zone. 7. The first 20 feet of the setback from the primary zone cannot be disturbed. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 11 of 44 The area has experienced extensive land alteration in the last two years with the construction of TH 212, the extension of Powers Boulevard and the placement of the access road onto the site. The corridor, which was contiguous in 2006, has experience significant fragmentation, tree loss and wetland loss. to ie ea: eo: 2006 Existing Conditions 2008 Existing Conditions Figure 4. Land use changes from 2006 to 2008 All of these land use changes lead to increased runoff to Bluff Creek and further degradation of the creek. In addition, as loss of wetland and woodland diminishes the wildlife and aesthetic value of the area, the function and value of the Bluff Creek corridor as a natural area is reduced. Natural Habitat Preservation Section 20-1561. Natural Habitat Preservation. (a) Natural habitat areas within the primary zone shall be preserved as permanent open space. Any development that occurs shall be directly related to the development of a continuous greenway along the creek from the Minnesota River to Lake Minnewashta as outlined in the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan. (b) Where possible, any disturbances of natural habitat areas within the secondary zone shall be avoided. Any alterations to the natural habitat within the secondary zone shall adhere to the practices delineated in the city's surface water management plan. Land use changes on the property have already resulted in the loss of one Manage 1 wetland and a significant area of woodland. The proposed development plan will remove nearly three additional acres of trees. Further, the limits of tree removal and the placement of the road will completely sever the southwestern portion of the site, as well as Bluff Creek and the adjoining wetland from the remainder of the property. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 12 of 44 Wetlands Wetland A, as shown in Figure 4 above, was filled to create an access road to the site. This wetland was part of a drainage system that flowed from northeast to southwest across the site into the filled wetland before discharging into the riparian wetland adjacent to Bluff Creek. Twc other wetlands exist on or immediately adjacent to the project site. The first is located near the top of Figure 4 and was intended to be restored and expanded to mitigate for the loss of Wetland A. To date, this mitigation has not been performed. The original applicant has given a letter of credit to the City of Chanhassen and has until June 1, 2009 to complete the restoration or be in violation of the WAP and the Wetland Conservation Act. The other wetland potentially affected by the proposed development is the largest basin located just east of center in Figure 4. This wetland was restored and is under a perpetual Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) Reserve Program easement. The Natural Resource Conservation Service, NRCS, is the holder of this easement and must approve any changes to the hydrology of this wetland. No jurisdictional wetland boundary determination or delineation has been performed on this wetland. The RIM easement exists up to the 901.5 foot elevation. Based upon soils, hydrology, existing drainage patterns and topography, it is highly probable that the wetland extends well beyond the water's edge. This is of importance when considering the proposed road alignment which would be directed through this fringe wetland area south of the wetland. The existing east -west trail visible in Figure 5 is the approximate centerline of the proposed road. A wetland delineation will be needed to determine the extent of the wetland. Depending upon the findings, any proposed impacts will require a Wetland Alteration Permit showing that sequencing conditions are met and that they will be mitigated for at the required ratio if allowed. Avoidance must always be the first consideration. This wetland, although identified as a Manage 1 wetland, would actually be classified as a Preserve wetland based upon the existence of the RIM easement which was unknown at the time our wetland inventory was performed. This classification requires a 40-foot buffer and a 40- foot setback of primary structures from the buffer. Although outside of the Bluff Creek Overlay District, the road should be aligned to stay out of the buffer and setback. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 13 of 44 Woodlands The filling of the wetland and subsequent construction of the pond resulted in removal of a significant area of woodland. Further removal has taken place north of the new pond in an area outside of the approved wetland mitigation plan (see Figure 2). The proposed plan would remove approximately three additional acres of woodland. This removal would create additional woodland edge which would be highly susceptible to colonization by European buckthorn, garlic mustard and other invasive species. This removal would result in further fragmentation of the natural corridor that exists currently. Finally, this removal would result in a decrease of interception of rainfall and an increase in runoff, ultimately leading to finther degradation of Bluff Creek. The previously submitted hydrologic model shows that runoff from the site increases from 50% to over 100% depending upon the rainfall event for the proposed plan. Bluffs There are no areas within the proposed grading area that meet the criteria of "bluff' as defined in City Code. The Bluff Creek Overlay District has additional requirements for impervious coverage based upon slopes. Section 20-1556. Impervious Coverage and Slopes Within the secondary zone of the BCO district, areas with average slopes exceeding 25 percent shall be preserved in their natural states and maintained as permanent open space. Areas with average slopes less than 25 percent but greater than ten percent shall not exceed an impervious surface coverage of 25 percent. Because no development is to occur within the primary zone, this language is only mentioned as it pertains to the secondary zone. Most of the wooded area within the proposed grading limits exceeds ten percent slopes. Further, the majority of the soils within the wooded area are classified highly erodible land or potentially highly erodible land. Impervious Coverage Calculations were not provided to show the breakdown of impervious coverage within the primary zone or secondary zone. The following calculations are based upon planimetric calculations with the plan set. A planimeter is a tool used to calculate areas from a two- dimensional paper drawing. Some discrepancies are inherent when using this tool. Based upon the planimetric calculations, 5.75 acres of Lot 1 is within the primary zone. This does not include the proposed road and pond. The pond is entirely within the primary zone as is most of the proposed road. It is estimated, based upon the figures obtained from the planimeter, that 43.9% of that portion within Lot 1 will be impervious surface. Nearly 100% of the secondary zone will be impervious surface. Based upon the hydrologic calculations provided by the consulting engineer, runoff volumes for a one-year event will more than double for the entire site and nearly triple at the discharge under Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 14 of 44 Powers Boulevard to Bluff Creek. This discharge point will experience a 57% increase in runoff volume for a ten-year event while discharge from the entire site will increase by 51 % for the same rain event. This condition will likely be mitigated for somewhat because it does not discharge directly to Bluff Creek but instead into the adjacent wetland. Mitigation The project proposes construction of the building, an access drive, parking and retaining wall, as well as a storm water pond and public street within a portion of the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone. The encroachment into the primary zone and setback requires a variance. To mitigate for the impacts to the primary corridor, the applicant should submit a plan for the restoration of areas adjacent to the Bluff Creek Corridor with species consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan. Additionally, the developer should be required encouraged to meet green construction standards to mitigate the impacts in the primary zone through the enhanced environmental benefits from the green construction. The applicant is requesting a variance to encroach into the primary zone. This variance needs to be the minimum necessary to accomplish the goals. A variety of practices and designs are available and could potentially decrease the total impact to the primary zone. These should be evaluated in an attempt to minimize these impacts. This includes, but is not limited to, alternative stormwater design, disconnected pavement areas, pervious pavement and the establishment of forested areas. Various products are available to allow for storage and treatment of stormwater under the parking lot. This would reduce or eliminate the need to place the pond in Outlot B and subsequently remove those trees further minimizing total land disturbance within the primary zone. Other options may be available to promote infiltration or abstraction of rainfall and decrease the resulting runoff volumes. The applicant should evaluate recognized low -impact development techniques as to their benefits, and incorporate these techniques where practicable to do so, or clearly show why they are not practicable. During previous iterations, there was discussion about using a four-story building and a parking ramp in the event that MnDOT does not turn back the right-of-way as anticipated. It may be possible to use the same design techniques to minimize the impact to the primary zone. In conjunction with the development of the site and to mitigate some of the natural feature impacts of the proposed development, the site developer should be re"ired encouraged to meet standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Green Building Raring System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines (MSBG), administered by the University of Minnesota Center for Sustainable Building Research. The area east of Lot 1 within Outlot A and the primary corridor of Bluff Creek shall be covered by a conservation easement, which shall be recorded with the first phase of the development. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. Due to the fact that this area of Outlot A is undevelopable (the property cannot get access to the west Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 15 of 44 because of the 12- foot retaining wall, cannot be accessed to the public street because of the site grades and the existing wetland and wetland setbacks required for any development would not permit the siting of structures in this area) the land within the conservation easement could not be used in future phases for density transfer purposes. The city shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. Any wetland mitigation activities that are required within this area shall have final approval by city staff. No additional activities shall be allowed within this area and access to the mitigation site shall be the existing path. The wooded areas of Lot 1 and Outlot B shall be covered by a conservation easement that restricts specific activities and prohibits any further development within the area. The granting of the variance to encroach into the Bluff Creek primary zone is unavoidable due to the configuration of Powers Boulevard (CSAII 17) and Highway 212 and the access to the site. This site is intended as a gateway location of the City. As such, it requires a significant site presence. The easterly driveway is proposed to provide a separation between client, employee and surgical patient pickup traffic. Staff is recommending approval of the variance subject to the development incorporating mitigation strategies outlined above. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 16 of 44 SUBDIVISION REVIEW II II r-- I BLS , F-_ TN- ` I � � I � I i I The developer, United Properties LLC, is proposing the creation of one lot and two outlots. Lot 1 is proposed for the development of the Powers Crossing Professional Center. Outlot A is reserved for future development. Outlot B contains the stormwater pond and a lift station site for the City of Chanhassen. The preliminary plat currently does not have a name. Staff recommends that the Plat continue the name of Butternut Ridge as Butternut Ridge First Addition. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 17 of 44 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL A gravel driveway extends from the curb cut on Powers Boulevard and accesses the flat area to the north of the pond. The pond was constructed in 2006 when the access for the MnDOT construction staging area was constructed. The trees south of the driveway have been cleared. The remainder of the area proposed for development is treed. The high point of area proposed for development is on the northeast corner of proposed Lot 1. The ridge continues along the northern property line. A drainageway extends from the east and discharges to the area proposed for development. The developer has submitted drainage calculations. The following illustrates the existing and proposed drainage areas. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 18 of 44 i rFr- Existing drainage areas Proposed drainage areas A summary of the existing and proposed drainage is as follows: Area Peak Disc har a cfs Existing Proposed Existin Proposed l yr 2 yr 10 yr 100 yr l yr 2 yr 10 yr 100 yr To Highway 212 ROW 2.10 ac 2.10 ac 1.3 2.1 5.1 9.5 1.7 2.6 5.8 10.4 To Highway 212 ROW 2.12 AS PF 1.02 ac 1.5 2.4 5.6 10.2 2.0 2.6 4.5 6.9 To Powers Blvd pipe 0.71 ac 0.69 ac 1.0 1.4 2.7 4.6 1.0 1.4 2.7 4.4 To off -site wetland 3.70 ac 3.32 ac 1.8 3.0 7.5 14.2 2.0 3.1 7.4 13.6 To Powers Blvd ditch 7.42 ac 7.42 ac 5.2 9.0 23.7 46.0 4.7 8.2 22.9 45.6 11.01 ac 12.30 ac n/a 0.24 ac 27.1 ac 27.1 ac The drainage calculations indicate that the post -development peak discharge rates increase to the Highway 212 right-of-way. A copy of the drainage calculations were forwarded to MnDOT for their review and comment. Although City staff has not received written comments, MnDOT staff has indicated that the plans must be revised so that the peak discharge rates to their system do not increase. A drainage permit will be required from MnDOT. The plans must also be modified so that the peak discharge to the off -site wetland does not increase under fully developed conditions. The drainage area shown in blue contains a drainageway. Under the proposed developed conditions a retaining wall will be constructed across the drainageway on the west side of the building. ti Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 19 of 44 The developer proposes to install storm sewer to convey runoff from the drainageway underneath the retaining wall. The plans must be revised to provide either an overland emergency overflow or an additional outlet control structure at a higher elevation. The developer must submit a letter from an engineer stating that the retaining wall design can accommodate temporary ponding behind the wall. The runoff from the drainageway will not be treated in the proposed stormwater pond since the runoff is from an undeveloped area. The runoff will be conveyed to the Powers Boulevard drainage ditch on the southwest corner of the site via storm sewer pipe. The alignment of the storm sewer pipe must be redesigned to eliminate excess cover over the pipe. The plan indicates that the storm sewer in the northwest comer of the parking lot will connect to storm sewer installed with Highway 212. If MnDOT approves this connection, then the plans must be revised to show the existing pipe. Wetlands One wetland exists on the property. This wetland is located north and east of the proposed building site. A second wetland formerly existed on the site. This wetland was impacted under Wetland Alteration Permit #2006-32. Under this WAP, the applicant was to replace the wetland by creating new wetland adjacent to the formerly discussed wetland. This replacement, per the approved WAP and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, was to be constructed prior to or concurrent with the approved wetland impact. To date, in violation of the approved permit, this mitigation area has not been constructed. The applicant requested additional time so that several oak trees could be spaded out of the area and transplanted elsewhere on the site. Staff agreed to this request but only after the applicant produced an Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $5,000 identifying the City of Chanhassen as the beneficiary and the applicant agreed to have the restoration complete no later than June 1, 2009. The applicant has begun taking steps to create the mitigation area. The applicant will need to comply with all other conditions of the WAP. In the event that the restoration is not completed, this may constitute a violation of the Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 20 of 44 Wetland Conservation Act and could, by law, require replacement at a ratio of as much as 4:1 in addition to other compensations. if 3 i Y—L.�� ` _ E•i31Rr �c35`�' - Figure 2. Approved Wetland Grading and MNgation Plan In addition to the previously identified wetland, at least one other wetland exists on or in proximity to the subject property such that the likelihood of wetland impact is significant. This wetland is a Preserve wetland which is in a Perpetual Reinvest In Minnesota Easement (RIM) and a perpetual Flowage Easement. Both easements are held by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture and are administered by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and are described as containing all land up to the 901.5. The proposed road alignment to the east appears to be outside of the RIM easement. However, the jurisdictional wetland boundary was never determined and is not identified anywhere within the plan set or in the Delineation Report prepared by Westwood Professional Services in August of 2006. A Preserve wetland requires a 40-foot buffer and a 40-foot setback from the buffer of primary structures. Secondary structures must be setback 20 feet from the buffer. A jurisdictional wetland boundary determination and delineation will be needed to determine the extents of the buffer and setbacks and the impact this will have on the road alignment. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 21 of 44 Surface Water Drainage The majority of the site drains to the Bluff Creek watershed. In the existing conditions, the drainage from the proposed mitigation area flows from northeast to southwest through an intermittent stream channel to what was formerly a Manage I wetland. This drainage currently is conveyed through the same channel to the existing stormwater pond. Because this water is "clean" it does not require treatment prior to discharge into the wetland located west of Powers Boulevard adjacent to Bluff Creek. The applicant has been instructed to direct this flow such that it bypasses the proposed stormwater pond, thus minimizing the pond size necessary to accommodate this volume and still meet National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) recommendations. It is apparent that there is an area of depression upstream of the proposed building site. It is quite conceivable that this area could be utilized to store runoff, thereby garnering extended detention and rate control. This practice was identified in the Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan, the Draft Bluff Creek Corridor Feasibility Study and in the Second Generation Surface Water Management Plan as one that would yield beneficial results in the limiting of erosion and sediment deposition within Bluff Creek. It is recommended that the applicant evaluate and utilize this practice as water will likely impound behind the proposed retaining wall in either case. By moving the inundation further from the retaining wall, the potential hazards of having water behind the wall will be minimized. The applicant is also proposing to increase peak discharge rates to the MnDOT system constructed for the TH 212 project. This practice is generally not accepted and MnDOT will need to comment as to whether they would allow this increase in peak discharge. The applicant is also requesting to berm a low area between the RIM wetland and the proposed mitigation area. This is not indicated on the plan set but was requested through conversations with City staff. The RIM wetland is not tributary to the Bluff Creek system and it does not appear that the proposed activity would result in a redirection of surface water drainage from one watershed to another. However, it will be incumbent upon the applicant to show that this is the case and to show that the creation of this berm will not result in a change in hydrology or hydraulics and will not have a deleterious impact on downstream properties and receiving water bodies. Drainage is directed to the RIM wetland from the south through a relatively well-defined swale. Under the proposed road alignment, this Swale will be intersected by the road. Conveyance must be maintained from this swale to the RIM wetland. An appropriately sized and designed culvert needs to be installed under the proposed road to maintain this conveyance and prevent the possibility of erosion and sediment deposition. Erosion Control The applicant has provided a Grading and Erosion Control Plan for Phase Two but has not incorporated any of the changes requested by staff. Phase II is contingent upon MnDOT turning Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 22 of 44 back a portion of the right-of-way to the land owner. In the event that the MnDOT right-of-way is not turned back to the applicant, this plan will not address erosion and sediment control issues specific to site grading for Phase I only. If the applicant does not receive the tumback as anticipated, or does not grade the entire area as shown on the plan for any reason, a new plan set will be required specific to Phase I grading. As indicated in City Code, grading should be phased, where practicable to do so, such that the least amount of disturbed area is exposed at any one time. That the plan is designed for two separate phases indicates that it is practicable to do so. Staff recommends that a phasing plan be included with the erosion control to indicate the timing of when areas will be open. No Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was provided with this plan. The consulting engineer has stated that they will provide this as well as the additional erosion control best management practices with the construction level drawings. It has always been the practice of the City to require a full SWPPP and erosion control plans be submitted as part of the review process. Article II Section 18-40 (4)g states that a soil and erosion control plan are required as part of the submittal. Staff sees no compelling reason to deviate from this practice. In addition, the Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District will need to see these plans and comment on them. The development must comply with Carver Soil and Water Conservation District comments. These comments have been made available to the applicant and are incorporated by reference. In general, they require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan be developed and submitted for review per the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit. In addition to landscaping requirements, plantings are a part of the erosion control best management practices. The submittal does indicate landscaping trees and calls out a seed mix to be used on disturbed areas. Those disturbed areas adjacent to the remaining wooded areas will experience shaded conditions. The MnDOT 340 mix does not seem appropriate for these areas and staff recommends that a modified BWSR U7 seed mix be used instead. Further, those disturbed areas east of the proposed building and south of the proposed road which will not have buildings, parking or other permanent surface structures should be reforested with native deciduous tree species consistent with the existing species composition. Based upon the tree survey, this would indicate that bur oak should be used. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP) The following charges are based upon the 2008 SWMP fees for water quality and water quantity. These fees are consistent with Minn. Stat. § 103B. The site is an Office and Institutional zoning change. The acreage used to calculate the fees are based upon the assumption that the tumback of MnDOT right-of-way will occur. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 23 of 44 Developable Acreage Calculations Area (ac) w/o Turnback Area (ac) w/ Turnback Lot 1 8.26 10.31 Outlot A 103.03 103.03 Outlot B 1.74 2.53 ROW 1.18 1.18 Total 114.21 1 117.05 Water Quality Fees The 2008 per acre water quality fees for commercial development is $6,820.00. Total developable acreage for build out is 11.21 acres. Based upon these figures, total estimated water quality fees for the development equals $76,452.20. Water Quantity Fees The 2008 per acre water quantity fees for commercial development is $17,400.00. Total developable acreage equals 11.21 acres. Based upon these figures, total estimated water quantity fee is $195,054.00. SWMP Credits The City of Chanhassen gives SWMP fee credits for on -site stormwater treatment. This credit is equal to one-half of the water quantity fee per acre of development treated in a NURP basin. According to the drainage calculations and figures provided by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., 8.93 acres of the developed site will be treated in the proposed pond. This results in a SWMP credit of $77,691.00. In addition, the pond outlet and the outlet for the bypass system each warrant a credit of $2,500.00 for an additional $5,000.00 credit. This means the estimated total SWMP credit is $82,691.00. Based upon the above fees and credits, the estimated SWMP fee due at the time of final plat is $271,506.20. RETAINING WALLS The developer proposes to construct two retaining walls: Location Length Maximum Height East of the building 440 feet 12 feet East of the proposed pond 230 feet 6 feet Building permits are required for retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 24 of 44 UTIIdTIES Lateral sanitary sewer and watermain to serve the proposed buildings will extend from the existing trunk utilities in Powers Boulevard. The developer will be responsible for extending lateral sanitary sewer and watermain to the east end of the access road; therefore, the sanitary sewer and water connection charges will be waived. A manhole must be installed at the terminus of the sanitary sewer. All sanitary sewer and watermain within Lot 1, Block 1 shall be privately owned and maintained. The storm sewer that will convey runoff from the drainageway to the east of the property shall also be privately owned and maintained, including those portions that lie within public right-of- way and the City owned outlot. The 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement shown on the preliminary plat over this storm sewer must be deleted. The plans include a 50-foot wide by 50-foot deep pad at the southeast corner of the Powers Boulevard/access road intersection. This pad will be within the same outlot as the proposed stormwater pond, which shall be deeded to the City. The City will construct a sanitary sewer lift station and forcemain under a separate contract. Staff anticipates that the forcemain will be directionally bored to minimize impacts. The preliminary plat includes a 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement extending from the lift station, east within the access road right of way, then northeast along the west side of an off - site wetland for the City to install sanitary sewer forcemain. Due to the variability associated with the forcemain installation, the City requires a temporary blanket drainage and utility easement - or similar mechanism acceptable to the City - over the proposed forcemain corridor. Each new lot will be subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. The 20" 2009 trunk hookup charges are +,-769 $1893/SAC unit for sanitary sewer and *,4W $5,087/SAC unit for watermain. These fees will be collected with the building permit, subject to the rates in effect at the time of building permit, and shall be based on the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' SAC unit determination. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. All public utility improvements will require a preconstruction meeting before building permit issuance. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required, including the MPCA, Department of Health, Carver County and Watershed District. Upon project completion, as -built drawings must be submitted for the private utilities. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 25 of 44 This project is the first development to be proposed in the 2010 MUSA. In order for sewer service to be provided to the property, a trunk sanitary lift station will need to be constructed as identified in the 2008 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan. This lift station will need to be sized to accommodate the future developments in the sewer shed, not just this development. The current estimated cost of this lift station and associated forcemain piping is $1,900,000. Funding for the construction of the lift station is planned to be paid for by future connections as identified in the 2007 Utility Rate Study. Depending on the desire of the property owners in this area to develop and the economy, the 2010 MUSA may take longer to develop than originally anticipated when the 2007 Utility Rate Study was drafted. It could therefore take longer to pay back the cost of the construction of the lift station and the City could take on more carrying costs than originally anticipated. The hookup charges for the first phase of this development are estimated at $50,000. In total for both phases of the project, it is estimated the sanitary sewer hookup at today's rates is $80,000. In order for this development to be advanced, some if not all of the costs for the lift station should be financed by the development to mitigate financial costs if future developments do not come in as originally anticipated. Staff is proposing the developer finance the cost of the lift station and the City would pay back the cost of the lift station to the developer as future developments come in. STREETS/ACCESS The developer proposes to construct a public street from Powers Boulevard, approximately 600 feet south of the Highway 212 on ramp. A curb cut was constructed at this location when this segment of Powers Boulevard was constructed. needed.%%th Gafver- County and provide additional r-i& of way, if The developer must ensure that all traffic study data is provided to Carver County for their review and must incorporate Carver County and MNDOT's comments into the plan. The traffic study also indicates that the intersection at Powers Boulevard will likely wan -ant a traffic signal when the second building phase is constructed. The 2005 AUAR traffic analysis did not include a traffic signal at this intersection because at that time a through street was not proposed on the subject property because lower density development was projected. The traffic study indicates that the full buildout of this property will warrant the traffic signal;; '' developer- must pay a eash fee with the final plat to eever- the eest of the tmffie signal. SfaffMll deteFmine the signal eest prior- W &W plat approval. Due to the unknown timeframe associated with the signal installation, an updated traffic study must be submitted with Phase 2 improvements. Powers Crossing's financial obligations with respect to the signal installation will be determined at that time and incorporated into the Site Plan Agreement for Phase 2. The public street will be 50 feet wide. The plans include turn lanes from the access road into the site. An 80-foot wide right-of-way will be platted to accommodate the access road, including the turn lanes. A temporary roadway, drainage and utility easement must be provided over the cul- de-sac at the east end of the access road. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 26 of 44 This property is subject to the Arterial Collector Fee which is $3,600 per developable acre. The acreage used in this calculation shall include the right-of-way turnback from both Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. This fee shall be paid in cash with the final plat. Submit proposed names for the street labeled "Access Road" on plans for approval. TREE PRESERVATION Tree canopy coverage and preservation calculation for the subdivision are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands and bluffs) 559,310 sq It Total canopy area (excluding wetlands and bluffs) 221,675 sq ft Baseline canopy coverage 40% Minimum canopy coverage allowed 20% or 111,862 sq It Proposed tree preservation 22% or 124,341 sq ft The applicant meets minimum requirements for tree preservation. All of the existing wooded areas within the proposed subdivision are within the Bluff Creek primary and secondary corridors. Because of this, the applicant was asked to minimize grading and tree removal in the development and revise the original grading plan. The revised grading does not present any changes. The tree removal remains identical to the original proposal. The intent of the primary corridor, to protect the watershed of Bluff Creek, has not been met by the proposed plan. To mitigate for the effects of development within the primary corridor, the developer should be required to meet green construction standards for the whole site. In wooded areas within the grading limits, staff recommends that all resulting openings be reforested with native trees. There are multiple sites that can be reforested along the eastern wooded area and along the east end of the access road. Tree planting sites are also available around the proposed pond to the south. Tree species shall be selected from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native species list. Staff recommends that the area east of Lot 1 within Outlet A and the primary corridor of Bluff Creek be covered by a conservation easement. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. A legal description of the area is included in the report. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. Any wetland mitigation activities that are required within this area shall have final approval by City staff. No additional activities shall be allowed within this area and access to the mitigation site shall be the existing path. Staff recommends that the wooded areas of Lot 1 and Outlot B also be covered by a conservation easement that restricts specific activities and prohibits any further development within the area. The applicant is proposing to save several large oaks along the eastern grading limits. Staff recommends that the following practices be required in order to insure the best chance of survival for the oaks: understory trees near the oaks shall be preserved, roots at the grading limits shall be cut cleanly with a trencher or vibratory plow and tree preservation fencing shall be installed prior to Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 27 of 44 any grading. Preserving the existing grade as far out as possible from the base of the tree would be very beneficial. The applicant could install a second retaining wall that would protect the existing grade and reduce grading. PARKS AND RECREATION PARKS A primary component of the 1997 Park, Open Space and Trail Referendum was acquisition of a large, highly desirable parcel of open space. The "Fox" woods located north and east of the proposed Powers Crossing Professional Center contains the largest forested preserve in the city's park system. Collection of a park dedication fee in lieu of acquisition of additional open space as a condition of approval for the Powers Crossing project is recommended. Based on 2009 park fees and a total area of Lot 1, Block 1, of 10.31 acres, the estimated park fee would be $128,875 (10.31 acres x $12,500/acre). TRAILS • Powers Boulevard Trail: This existing section of trail was installed concurrent with the extension of Powers Boulevard. This trail transports people north and south between the proposed access road and the on/off ramp at Highway 212. • Access Road Trail: Designation and construction of this 10-ft. wide trail on the north side of the proposed access road is consistent with the comprehensive plan and, when extended east, will serve as an important east/west trail connection between Powers Boulevard and Highway 101. The developer shall be responsible for the construction of this trail. • North Trail: Construction of the 10-11. wide 'North Trail" as a condition of Powers Cross' approval of this subdivision will satisfy an . F ;� important pedestrian connection. The Uft . Tr,wf E �,..mom ,„,.�,.,,,,,,,,a,,,,, intersection of Powers Boulevard and the Highway 212 on/off ramp will serve as a key trailhead location in the future. An extensive trail system will be developed in the park preserve serving as a primary attractor to this area. In addition, a future second regional trail connection will extend from this intersection northeast along a large wetland and running parallel with Highway 212. This particular section of trail will extend to the intersection of Highway 101 and Lyman Boulevard serving Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 28 of 44 as a commuter bikeway in addition to a recreational trail. The developer shall be responsible for the construction of this trail. The current design as shown in the plan set for the North Trail is not acceptable. Assuming that the MnDOT right-of-way at this location will remain fenced, the trail should be set back a minimum of 3 feet from the fence to safely allow for winter plowing and snow storage. Similarly, a minimum 3-foot boulevard (6 feet or more being preferred) should be maintained between the trail and the parking lot, again for winter maintenance and snow removal, but more importantly to create an aesthetically pleasing and inviting trail corridor and property boundary. Future Trail: A future trail connection to the park preserve will start at the South East Corner of Lot 1, Block 1. To accommodate this future trail alignment a triangular shaped permanent trail easement will be needed at this location. (Reference Trail Map) At the time of development of Outlot A, the developer shall be responsible for the design and construction of the trail and the City shall reimburse them for the construction costs. COMPLIANCE TABLE Areas . ft. Frontage(ft.) Depth(ft.) Notes Code 15,000 75 150 Lot 1 359,689 488 737 8.26 ac. (10.31 ac. with MnDOTland 103.03 ac. Future Outlot A 4,487,987 Development Area less the area of the conservation easement 1.74 ac. (2.53 ac. with Outlot B 75,911 MnDOT land) Storm water pond ROW 1 51,623 1.18 ac. TOTAL 4,975,210 114.21 ac. (117.05 ac. with MnDOT land) MnDOT will be reconveying approximately 2.8 acres of land back to the property owner. This land represents excess right-of-way taken for the construction of Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 29 of 44 GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE The developer is proposing a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot medical office building, and up to a 731-stall, five - level parking ramp. The full buitdout is predicated upon a turnback to the land owner of MnDOT right-of-way. In the event that this turnback does not occur, the applicant has requested to build a four-story building totaling 112,000 square feet. The Office Institutional (Ol) District limits building height to two stories. The proposed number of stories for both the building and parking ramp exceed the district regulations, by one and four stories respectively. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance from these standards in conjunction with the site plan review. The applicant is also requesting a variance from the sign ordinance to permit a larger monument sign in conjunction with the project. Finally, the applicant is requesting a variance from the setback requirements in the OI district and Bluff Creek corridor. While the development had originally been contemplated as a planned unit development (PUD), staff felt that OI zoning with a variance request was more appropriate for the site since this project would be a single building and one accessory structure. The PUD district is a better zoning district for mixed use or highly complex developments. The OI district; in this case, provides an adequate and limited range of development for the lot. The need for the variances is due to the type and function of building. This site is intended as a gateway location of the City. As such, it requires a significant site presence. To do this with a one or two story structure would not provide the same impact as a taller building and would require even greater encroachment into the Bluff Creek Primary zone. As part of staffs initial discussions with the developer, staff had recommended that the building be pushed as close to Powers Boulevard as possible. However, due to the need for the reconveyance of the excess right-of-way back to the property owner, the uncertainty of timing for such tumback, and the site user's desire to have the building overlooking the natural area east of the site, the developer has located the building as far east on the property as was feasible given the requirements for setback and parking. The first phase of the development consists of a three-story, 88,000 square -foot building, comprising the south half (72,000 square feet) and the main entrance area (16,000 square feet) of the building. The second phase would add the north half of the building and the parking ramp structure. The timing of the phasing is indeterminate at this time, but shall rely on market conditions. In order to mitigate some of the natural feature impacts of the proposed development, the site developer should be required to meet standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Green Building Rating System by the Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 30 of 44 U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines (MSBG), administered by the University of Minnesota Center for Sustainable Building Research. LEED activities provide a point system for a project. The minimum scoring necessary for LEED certification would be 26 points. The maximum scoring is 59 points, which provides a Platinum certification. An example of a project with Platinum certification is the Great River Energy Corporation in Maple Grove, Minnesota. Green design not only makes a positive impact on public health and the environment, it also reduces operating costs, enhances building and organizational marketability, potentially increases occupant productivity, and helps create a sustainable community. MSBG requires development to comply with four sustainable categories: performance management, site and water, indoor environmental quality, and materials and waste. This system functions on a base standard (Buildings, Benchmarks and Beyond, B3). Sustainable design is a means to reduce energy expenditures, enhance the health, well-being and productivity of the building occupants, and improve the quality of the natural environment. The Minnesota Legislature required the Departments of Administration and Commerce, with the assistance of other agencies, to develop sustainable building design guidelines for all new state buildings funded by bond money after January 15, 2004. According to the legislation, the guidelines must: • Exceed the energy code in effect in January 2004 by at least 30 percent • Achieve lowest possible lifetime costs for new buildings • Encourage continual energy conservation improvements in new buildings • Ensure good indoor air quality • Create and maintain a healthy environment • Facilitate productivity improvements • Specify ways to reduce material costs • Consider the long-term operating costs of the building including the use of renewable energy sources and distributed electric energy generation that uses a renewable source of natural gas or a fuel that is as clean or cleaner than natural gas. Size Portion Placement Due to site topography and proposed grading, the main entry to the building is located on the west elevation of the building. The entry is highlighted by being recessed in the middle of the ultimate building with a canopy covering the entrance and drive-up/drop-off. The entrance consists of expanded storefront window treatments. Material and Detail and Color The developer is proposing the use of three colors of face brick (light iron spot (reddish -brown), beige velour (tan), and limestone (white) as the primary building material. Accent bands and Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 31 of 44 columns use a cream stone. The end cap of the building consists of a bronze metal panel and gray window curtain walls. The building fagade is articulated through the use of projecting columns along the first floor elevation as well as projected segments incorporating vertical glass panels spaced along the building front. The lower level consists of larger window openings than the upper stories. The parking garage continues the use of the face brick. However, it appears as if only one brick color is proposed. Staff would recommend that the architecture of the primary structure be continued on the garage through the use of the three brick colors as well as the use of stone and metal. Height and Roof Design The project proposes a flat roof with raised towers for stairwells and elevators. The variety of roof heights add architectural detail and articulation to the building. The highest roof/parapet height is 55 feet. A one-story canopy is provided over the drop-off entry to the building. Facade Transparency Fifty percent of the first floor elevation that is viewed by the public shall include transparent windows and/or doors. All other areas shall include landscaping material and architectural detailing and articulation. Site Furnishing Community features may include landscaping, lighting, benches, and tables. The developer shall provide secure bicycle racks and/or storage (within 200 yards of a building entrance) for 5% or more of all building users (measured at peak periods), and provide shower and changing facilities in the building. The developer shall also provide benches throughout the site as well as tables and chairs in the patio area. Loading Areas, Refuse Area, etc. Screening of service yards, refuse and waste removal, other unsightly areas and truck parking/loading areas is accomplished through the location of this area on the east side of the building. Landscaping Phase Minimum requirements for landscaping include 13,002 square feet of landscaped area around the parking lot, 52 trees for the parking lot, and bufferyard plantings along the north, south and west property lines. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 32 of 44 Phase I Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 13,002 sq. ft. >13,002 s . ft. Trees/landscape area 52 canopy trees 23 canopy trees Landscape islands/peninsulas 20 islands/peninsulas 15 islands/peninsulas PHASE II Vehicular use landscape area 1 12,065 s . ft. 1 >12,065 s . ft. Trees/landscape area 148 canopy trees 135 canopy trees Landscape islands/peninsulas 119 islands/peninsulas 1 16 islands/peninsulas The applicant does not meet required landscape quantities for parking lot trees and islands/peninsulas in both phases. The applicant must meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees and landscape islands/peninsulas. In Phase II, increasing the interior width/planting area of the three islands currently proposed to be planted with perennials would serve to meet ordinance requirements. The three islands would need to specify overstory tree plantings. The interior width of the landscape islands in either Phase does not meet ordinance minimums. All landscape islands must have a minimum interior width of 10 feet inside the curbs. This includes the two islands that incorporate a sidewalk. There must be a 10-foot width of growing space in addition to the island. Required Proposed Phase I Proposed Phase II North property line 11 canopy trees 8 canopy 10 canopy bufferyard B — 570' 22 understory trees 15 understory 22 understory 34 shrubs 0 shrubs 36 shrubs West property line. 14 canopy trees 2 canopy 14 canopy bufferyard B — 720' 28 understory trees 7 understory 27 understory 43 shrubs 0 shrubs 49 shrubs South property line I 1 overstory 12 overstory 12 overstory Boulevard trees — 350' Phase I: The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for either of the bufferyard areas. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to meet minimum requirements. Phase II: The applicant is short one overstory tree in the north bufferyard. The applicant shall increase the plantings to meet minimum requirements. In the proposed plant schedule, the applicant must replace the Colorado spruce with another approved evergreen species. All transplanted materials must be pre -approved by the City. Transplanted trees will not be accepted if substituted without City approval. If approved for transplanting, the material must be warranted for a minimum of one year. If transplanted materials die, then they must be replaced with nursery stock. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 33 of 44 Lot Frontage and Parking Location Parking is distributed on the west and north sides of the building. The applicant is proposing proof of parking which includes adding additional levels of parking to the ramp in the future should site parking become an issue. The City may allow reductions in the number of parking spaces actually constructed as long as the applicant provides a proof of future parking plan. The City may require the installation of the additional parking whenever the need arises. Staff supports the use of proof of parking to reduce impervious surface until an actual demand for additional parking makes additional spaces necessary. I \, I fv- The developer is also proposing parking closer to the property line than permitted in the OI district. In all of the non-residential zoning districts, except the Central Business District which has no required setback, the standards permit reduction of the parking setback to 10 feet provided landscaping and bemung are proposed. The developer shall comply with the minimum parking setback requirement and install appropriate bemung and or landscaping to allow the 10 feet setback. The development incorporates berming along Powers Boulevard. The parking on the north side of the property, while 12 feet from the property line, will be over 55 feet from the Highway 212 on ramp. LIGHTING/SIGNAGE The developer is proposing the use of 30-foot tall site lighting with shoebox type fixtures, which complies with City Code. The plan specifies metal halide lamp type. City Code requires high- pressure sodium lighting. The light fixtures shall be revised to high-pressure sodium lighting. The applicant is requesting a 4-foot 8-inch height variance from the 5-foot sign height limitation to permit a 9-foot 8-inch tall sign and a 22 square -foot sign area variance from the 24-square foot Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 34 of 44 sign display area limitation to permit 46 square feet of sign display area. A [sign] variance may be granted from the requirements of this ordinance where it is shown that by reason of topography or other conditions, strict compliance with the requirements of this ordinance would cause a hardship; provided that a variance may be granted only if the variance does not adversely affect the spirit or intent of this ordinance. While staff believes that some type of sign relief is necessary, the sign height request appears excessive, considering that the development will also be able to install wall signage on their building. The monument sign is proposed for the southwest comer of the site. The sign is proposed in property that must be turned back by MnDOT. Until the land is turned back, any signage must be located on private property. This is a logical location for the building monument sign. This area, with a base elevation of 886, is approximately 8 feet higher than Powers Boulevard just north of the access road. However, the base height is 14 feet lower than the grade elevation at the northwest corner of the site. The OI signage criteria are usually used for a single -tenant building. The fact that there will be multiple tenants in the building leads to the need for additional area and size for the signage. The site is permitted only one monument -type sign. Staff believes that a compromise solution would be to permit the development to have signage consistent with the Industrial Office Park signage regulations which permits monument signs up to 8 feet in height with sign display area of 64 square feet. The development name in the monument sign shall be individual dimensioned letters with a minimum %-inch projection. The applicant is also proposing directional signage on the property. Such signage may be up to 5 feet in height with a sign area of 4 square feet. The sign height for these signs shall be reduced to 5 feet. The display area for sign #2 shall be reduced to 4 square feet. Additionally, the developer is showing areas for wall signage on the building. It should be noted that the logo is limited to 30 percent of the sign area. Staff will count the sign area of all the signage on a building elevation against the permitted sign area. The logo(s) then would be a percentage of this total sign area. The area of the wall signage must comply with the sign area standards for the OI district. A separate sign permit shall be required for all monument and wall signs. MISCELLANEOUS The buildings are required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. Accessible routes must be provided between commercial building(s), parking facilities and public transportation stops. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. All parking areas, including parking structure, must be provided with accessible parking spaces. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 35 of 44 COMPLIANCE TABLE Building Height ^ Building Setback Parking stalls 2 stories 1 story N-35' E*-40' W-35' S-35' Professional (Bldout) Phase I Clinic: 3 stories 3 stories Parking: 5 stories 0 stories N-45' E-0'@ N-455' E*-0@ W-153' S-78' W-235' S-78' Phase I: 499 stalls 413 stalls, plus 107 stalls proof of parking Phase II: 940 stalls 761 stalls, plus 288 stalls proof of parking (medical offices: 1/150 sq. ft. of floor area; standard offices: 5 per 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area for the first 50,000 sq. ft.; then 4 per 1,000 for the next 50,000 sq. ft., then 3 per 1,000 for the balance of the building ) Parking Setback N - 25' E* - 40' N - 12' E - 0' @ N - 73' E - 0' @ W-25' S-35' W-24' S-27' W-87' S-27' (Parking setbacks on public streets may be reduced to 10 feet with the use of berming and landscaping.) Hard surface 65% 590/0 Coverage Lot Area 0.34 acre 8.26 acres (10.31acres with MnDOT land) ^ The applicant is requesting a variance to permit a three-story building and up to a five -story parking ramp. Should the MnDOT land tumback not occur, then the applicant has an alternate request to permit a four-story building. * Setback from the Bluff Creek Primary Zone. @ The applicant is requesting a variance to encroach into the primary zone. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommends that the PlanpAng Ceffifflissie City Council adopt the following motions and adoption of the attached findings of fact . A. "The Chanhassen Planning Gemmission meeffffnends I City Council approves the Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, Butternut Ridge First Addition, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional District, OI." Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 36 of 44 B. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit with Variances to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; subject to the following conditions: 1. The property line may be revised to incorporate the reconveyed property from MnDOT to the developer. 2. The developer shall is encouraged to meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines (MSBG). 3. To mitigate for the effects of development within the primary corridor, the developer should be required encouraged to meet green construction standards for the whole site. 4. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. 5. Evaluate other site designs, stormwater management techniques and low -impact development practices for their benefit in reducing impacts to the primary and secondary zones of the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 6. Reforest those areas disturbed to grade the site but do not have structures on them. The reforestation should be done with deciduous tree species representative of the existing species composition. The forested areas are dominated by bur oak. 7. Maintain the natural drainage patterns. 8. The applicant must clearly illustrate how impacts to the primary zone are to be mitigated. This mitigation must consider all benefits derived from the primary zone as described in Article XXXI of the Chanhassen City Code. 9. The area east of Lot I within Outlot A within the primary corridor of Bluff Creek shall be covered by a conservation easement. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. Any wetland mitigation activities that are required within this area shall have final approval by City staff. No additional activities shall be allowed within this area and access to the mitigation site shall be the existing path. 10. The wooded areas of Lot I and Outlot B within the Bluff Creek primary zone shall be covered by a conservation easement that restricts specific activities and prohibits any further development within the area." Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 37 of 44 C. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Subdivision Preliminary Plat creating one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-of- way, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to the following conditions: 1. Revise the Plat natne to l3tMemu4 Ridge Fk-A Addition 2. The developer shall either dedicate/donate an Outlot or record a conservation easement containing the Bluff Creek Primary zone north of the road right-of-way in Outlot A. This area of Outlot A is undevelopable and the land within the conservation easement could not be used in future phases for density transfer purposes. A conservation easement shall be recorded over the Bluff Creek Primary zone located within Lot 1 and Outlot B. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. The easement shall be recorded with the first phase of the development. 3. Submit proposed names for street labeled "Access Road" on plans for approval. 4. The drainage report and plans must be revised to address comments from MnDOT. 5. The applicant must obtain a MnDOT drainage permit. 6. The drainage report and plans must be modified so that the peak discharge rate to the off -site wetland does not increase under fully developed conditions. 7. The plans must be revised to provide either an overland emergency overflow or an additional outlet control structure at a higher elevation. 8. The developer must submit a letter from an engineer stating that the retaining wall east of the building can accommodate temporary ponding behind the wall. 9. The alignment of the bypass storm sewer pipe must be redesigned to eliminate excess cover over the pipe. 10. If MnDOT allows a connection to the Highway 212 storm pipe, then show the existing pipe on the plan sheets. 11. Building permits are required for retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 12. A manhole must be installed at the terminus of the sanitary sewer. 13. All sanitary sewer and waternain within Lot 1, Block 1 shall be privately owned and maintained. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 38 of 44 14. The storm sewer that will convey runoff from the drainageway to the east of the property shall also be privately owned and maintained, including those portions that lie within public right-of-way and the City owned outlot. 15. The 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement shown on the preliminary plat over this storm sewer must be deleted. 16. Delete the 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement for the future watermain. 17. Provide a temporary blanket drainage and utility easement — or similar mechanism acceptable to the City - over the proposed forcemain corridor. The temporary easement shall not encroach into the building envelope as shown on the site plan. 18. A permanent 20-foot wide easement will be required over the final forcemain alignment. 19. Each new lot will be subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. These fees will be collected with the building permit, subject to the rates in effect at the time of building permit, and shall be based on the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' SAC unit determination. 20. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 21. All public utility improvements will require a preconstruction meeting before building permit issuance. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required, including the MPCA, Department of Health, Carver County and Watershed District. 22. Upon project completion as -built drawings must be submitted for the private utilities. 23. The double left turn lane on southbound Powers Boulevard must be constructed with Phase I improvements. The developer must ensure that all traffic study data is provided to Carver County for their review and must incorporate Carver County and NMOT's comments into the plan. 24.TheTe developer must eee.-diva the ,. f the detible left tufty lane with Gci-ye- � TCount. and provide additional ri& of way, if needed. 25. The developer must n a sh fee .M the final plat to eever the st of the t.effie signal. An updated traffic study must be submitted with Phase 2 improvements. Powers Crossing's financial obligations with respect to the signal installation will be determined at that time and incorporated into the Site Plan Agreement for Phase 2. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 39 of 44 26. A temporary roadway, drainage and utility easement must be provided over the cul-de-sac at the east end of the access road. 27. This property is subject to the Arterial Collector Fee which is $3,600 per developable acre. The acreage used in this calculation shall include the right-of-way turnback from both Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. This fee shall be paid in cash with the final plat 28. The RIM and Flowage Easements need to be indicated on the plat. This should include the document number 10-05-87-1. 29. The wetland mitigation area in Outlot A needs to be created. A Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants needs to be executed and recorded with Carver County. This document number needs to be included on the plat. 30. The remaining conditions of approval for WAP #2006-32 need to be met: a. The plans shall be revised to show how M-1 will be accessed. The access route shall be stable, shall avoid damage to significant trees (greater than 10" DBH) and shall avoid impacts to natural drainageways and any jurisdictional wetlands that may exist on site that were not delineated by Westwood Professional Services in August 2006. b. A planting plan for M-1, including invasive vegetation management techniques, species to be planted, proposed planting rates, and the approach to upland buffer restoration, shall be submitted prior to final City Council approval. c. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit equal to 110% of the cost of the wetland creation (including grading and seeding) to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland are met. The letter of credit shall be effective for no less than five years from the date of final plat approval. The applicant shall submit a cost estimate for wetland creation (including grading and seeding) so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of credit. d. A five-year wetland replacement monitoring plan shall be submitted. The replacement monitoring plan shall include a detailed management plan for invasive non-native species, particularly hybrid cattail, purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. The plans shall show fixed photo monitoring points for the replacement wetland. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. 31. The legal wetland boundary of the RIM wetland was not delineated in the Westwood Wetland Delineation Report dated August of 2006. This boundary must be delineated and wetland impacts avoided where possible. 32. Because of the perpetual RIM and flowage easements the plans must be provided to the Natural Resources Conservation Service for review and comment. Any comments from the NRCS must be made available to the City. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 40 of 44 33. Drainage to the RIM wetland from the south flows through a defined swale. The conveyance of this flow must be maintained under the proposed road extension. 34. Erosion Control plan needs to be updated per the July comments: a. Show a 75-foot rock construction entrance. b. Show rounding of comers for proposed grades. c. Erosion control blanket shall be shown on all slopes east of the proposed building and adjacent to the pond. d. An NPDES permit must be obtained prior to any site grading and a SWPPP must be provided to the City for review and comment. e. Replace MnDOT 340 mix with a modified BWSR U7 seed mix. 35. Estimated SWMP fees due at the time of final plat are $271,506.20. 36. The development must comply with Carver Soil and Water Conservation District comments. 37. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. 38. The following practices are required in order to insure the best chance of survival for the highlighted oaks to be preserved along the east side of the development: a. Understory trees near the oaks shall be preserved. b. Roots at the grading limits shall be cut cleanly with a trencher or vibratory plow. c. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed prior to any grading. d. Trees shall be thoroughly watered during dry periods. 39. The applicant shall install a second tier to the retaining wall at the north end of the east side of the development to preserve the grade surrounding the oaks proposed to be saved. 40. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall be in place and maintained until all construction is completed. 41. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans, dated 10/06/08, will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 42. All trees removed shall be chipped or hauled off site. No burning permits shall be issued. 43. The developer shall pay the full park dedication fee in force at the time of final plat approval and prior to recording. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 41 of 44 44. Construction of the 10-ft. wide bituminous access road trail and the North Trail. The North Trail plans shall be modified dedicating a permanent 20-foot wide trail easement to allow for appropriate separation from adjoining improvements and boulevard areas for winter plowing, snow storage and aesthetics. 45. Dedication of a permanent triangular shaped trail easement at the South East corner of Lot 1, Block 1. The triangle shall be 50' in length on its South side and 200' in length on its East side. 46. The developer shall finance the cost of the 2010 MUSA trunk lift station and enter into an agreement with the City for repayment." D. "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Site Plan with Variances for building height and Bluff Creek Primary Zone setbacks for Planning Case #08-16, for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office building, and up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp on Lot 1, Block 1 of the development, plans prepared by Pope Associates, Inc. and Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final plat for the development shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The full buildout is predicated upon a tumback to the land owner of MnDOT right-of-way. In the event that this turnback does not occur, the applicant may build a four-story building totaling 112,000 square feet subject to parking compliance with City Code. 3. The developer shall is encouraged to meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines, MSBG. 4. The developer shall continue the architectural detailing through the use of the three brick colors as well as the use of stone and metal on the garage structure. 5. The developer shall provide secure bicycle racks and/or storage (within 200 yards of a building entrance) for 5% or more of all building users (measured at peak periods), and provide shower and changing facilities in the building. The developer should also provide benches throughout the site as well as tables and chairs in the patio area. 6. 7. The buildings are required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 8. The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 42 of 44 9. Accessible routes must be provided between commercial building(s), parking facilities and public transportation stops. 10. All parking areas, including parking structure, must be provided with accessible parking. 11. The developer shall comply with the minimum parking setback requirement and install appropriate bemung and or landscaping to allow the 10 feet setback. 12. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 13. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. 14. The applicant shall install a second tier to the retaining wall at the north end of the east side of the development to preserve the grade surrounding the oaks proposed to be saved. 15. The applicant does not meet required landscape quantities for parking lot trees and islands/peninsulas in both phases. The applicant must meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees and landscape islands/peninsulas. 16. Phase I: The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for either of the bufferyard areas. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to meet minimum requirements. 17. Phase II: The applicant does not meet the minimum requirements for bufferyard areas. The applicant shall increase the plantings to meet minimum requirements. 18. The applicant must replace the Colorado spruce with other approved species in the plant schedule. 19. All transplanted materials must be pre -approved by the City. Transplanted trees will not be accepted if substituted without City approval. If approved for transplanting, the material must be warranted for a minimum of one year. If transplanted materials die, they must be replaced with nursery stock. 20. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall be in place and maintained until all construction is completed. 21. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans, dated 04/01/09, will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 22. All trees removed shall be chipped or hauled off site. No burning permits shall be issued. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 43 of 44 23. The North Trail plans or parking lot design shall be modified to allow for appropriate boulevard areas for winter plowing, snow storage and aesthetics. 24. A 3-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, and nothing shall be placed in front of the hydrant outlets, connections, fire protection control valves that would interfere with fire fighter operations. Section 508.5 MN. Fire Code and Sec. 508.5.4. 25. No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be removed or chipped on site. 26. Contact the Chanhassen Fire Marshal for locations of "No Parking Fire Lane" signage, and locations of curbing to be painted yellow. MN Fire Code Sec. 503.3. 27. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. MSFC sec 501.4. 28. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. MSFC Sec. 503.2.3. 29. Due to the unknown timeframe associated with the signal installation, an updated traffic study must be submitted with Phase 2 improvements. Powers Crossing's financial obligations with respect to the signal installation will be determined at that time and incorporated into the Site Plan Agreement for Phase 2." and E. "The Chanhassen Plamiing Gemmissien meemmends City Council approves a sign size Variance request to permit an eight (8) foot tall sign with up to 64 square feet of sign display area, subject to the following conditions: 1. Separate sign permits shall be required for each sign. 2. The development name in the monument sign shall be individual dimensioned letters with a minimum'/cinch projection. 3. Only one monument sign shall be permitted for the Powers Crossing Professional Center site. 4. The sign height for the directional signs shall be reduced to five feet. The display area for sign #2 shall be reduced to four square feet. 5. The sign location shall meet all setback and site triangle requirements." Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 44 of 44 ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Letter of reinstatement from William P. Katter to Robert Generous Dated March 5, 2009. 3. Development Review Application. 4. United Properties Development Narrative Dated April 1, 2009. 5. Letter from Ryan M. Edstrom, Westwood Professional Services, Inc., to City of Chanhassen Planning Department dated September 4, 2008. 6. Chanhassen Medical Office Development Site Traffic Study Memorandum Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. dated September 4, 2008. 7. Chanhassen Fairview Medical Center Site Traffic Analysis, Dated July 3, 2008, Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 8. Memo from Mike Spack, Spack Consulting to Alyson Fauske dated October 10, 2008. 9. Letter from Chip Hentges, Carver Soil & Water Conservation District, to Robert Generous dated October 10, 2008. 10. Letter from Roger Gustafson, Carver County Public Works, to Robert Generous dated August 14, 2008. 11. Letter from William Goff, MnDOT, to Sharmeen AI-Jaff dated August 14, 2008. 12. Letter from William Goff, MnDOT, to Sharmeen AI-Jaff dated October 27, 2008. 13. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List. g:\plan\2008 planning cases\08-16 fairview chanhassen medical center\staRreport fcmc.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of United Properties, LLC, and Timothy & Dawne Erhart for the following: • Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; • Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional, OI; • Subdivision into one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-of-way; • Site Plan Review with Variances for Powers Crossing Professional Center, a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot medical center, and a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp; and • Sign Variance On May 5, 2009, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of United Properties, LLC, and Timothy & Dawne Erhart for Powers Crossing Professional Center — Planning Case 09-06. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District, A2. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential — Low Density uses. 3. The legal description of the property is Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota. 4. Rezoning: a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed use is compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c. The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance with the granting of a variance for the setbacks and building height. d. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city s service capacity. f. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property, subject to the installation of the turn lanes and traffic signal. 5. Conditional Use Permits: a. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. b. The proposed use will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and the zoning ordinance. c. The proposed use will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. The proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. The proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. f. The proposed use will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The proposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. h. The proposed use will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. The proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. j. The proposed use will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. The proposed use will not depreciate surrounding property values. 6. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; 2 d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. 7. Site Plan: a. The proposed development is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. The proposed development is consistent with the site plan review requirements; c. The proposed development preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; d. The proposed development creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e. The proposed development creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1) An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2) The amount and location of open space and landscaping; 3) Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4) Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 8. Variances: a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Due to the topography of the site, the construction of the storm water pond in the primary zone is a reasonable request. The need for the variances is due to the type and function of building. This site is intended as a gateway location for the City. As such, it requires a significant site presence. To do this with a one or two story structure would not provide the same impact as a taller building and would require even greater encroachment in to the Bluff Creek Primary zone. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification because of the site location and prominence as well as the topography of the property. c. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land, but to permit an appropriate scale development due to site location and prominence and to locate the storm water pond in a logical location on the site. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship, but is due to site topography, site location and prominence. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. 9. The City Council, upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, may grant a variance from the requirement of the sign ordinance where it is shown that by reason of topography or other conditions, strict compliance with the requirements of this ordinance would cause a hardship; provided that a variance may be granted only if the variance does not adversely affect the spirit or intent of this ordinance. The need for the variance is because this site is intended as a gateway for the City. As such, it requires a significant site presence including signage that is more consistent with its highway entrance location. 10. The planning report #09-06, dated May 5, 2009, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit with Variances, Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office and Institutional District, OI, Preliminary Plat approval, Site Plan Approval with Variances, and Sign Variance for the Powers Crossing Professional Center project — Planning Case 09-06. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 5th day of May, 2009. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION M Its Chairman 4 I R� 2Y I I I I 1 March 5, 2009 Mr. Robert Generous Sr. Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. P. 0. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ref: United Properties application for development Erhart Property — SE Corner of Highway 212 and Powers Blvd. Dear Bob: RECEIVE® MAR 9 - 2009 CITY OF CHANHASSEN United Properties, on behalf of the landowner Timothy Erhart, would like to reinstate our development application for the subject property. As discussed with you last week, we will resubmit our plans for the development shortly with the only change being elimination of any reference to Fairview being involved with the project. Although we remain hopeful Fairview will anchor this project, we have not been authorized to use their name in connection with this project at this time. Ideally we would move forwards with public hearing process beginning in late April or early May, and not beforehand. Please advise on any additional items you may need from us in order to reinstate the application; we previously provided an escrow to the City in connection with the application and we presume the City continues to retain this escrow to process our application. Sincer William P. Katter Sr. Vice President United Properties LLC (952)837-8525 Cc: Tim Erhart Robb Gruman — Fairview Health Systems 3500 American Blvd. W. Suite 200 Minneapolis. MN 55431 T 952.835.5300 F 952.893.8206 upr0perties.com .i ReSU10rn ++,-d CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED SEP 1 9 2008 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 141NHASSENPANNINGOEPT Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Applicant Name and Address: United Properties LLC 3500 American Boulevard West Minneapolis, MN 55431 Contact: Bill Katter Phone: 952.837.8525 Fax: 952.893.8206 Email: william.katter@uproperties.com Planning Case No. (0 O I CITY OFCHANHASSEN RECEIVED JUL 0 3 2008 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT )wner Name and Address: Timothy A. & Dawne M. Erhart 9611 Meadowlark Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Contact: Phone: Fax: Email: NOTE: Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit X Conditional Use Permit (CUP) y a s Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements (VAC) Interim Use Permit ([UP) X Variance (VAR) DO O x` Non -conforming Use Permit X Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) _ Planned Unit Development` Zoning Appeal X Rezoning '� G Zoning Ordinance Amendment x Sign Permits x Sign Plan Review— X Site Plan Review (SPR)* G6O - ilo-1 j v2l-13 X Subdivision` ? C O Notification Sign — $200 (City to install and remove) X Escrow to Fjligg Fees/Attorge Cost" $50 �LlP AP/ etes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ S ,q l,S n , Iy An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. i, � s - _ tq-,)-_ 'Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 (".tif) format. "Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ISO sC.Aru+ED PROJECT NAME: Fairview Chanhassen Medical Center LOCATION: Intersection of (new) Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PID: outlot A Butternut Ridge Addition, PID# 251550020 TOTALACREAGE: 116.88 WETLANDS PRESENT: PRESENT ZONING: x YES tural Estate District NO REQUESTED ZONING: office and Institutional District PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Residential Low Density REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: office and Institutional REASON FOR REQUEST: Improve land to include development of a medical center, access road, storm pond, and allow for future development of a City lift station, sanitary sewer, and other necessary infrastructure. FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW: Include number of existing employees: and new employees: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. c MATTNt\N VOL'S0'A0 l"1 03 iUJ S)94ture pli t i� 1V& ASS icIgrE Dat , of Ur"'\TIED P oMy-nes uc Signature of Fee Owner Date G:\plan\forms\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 1/08 SCANNED PROJECT NAME: Fairview Chanhassen Medical Center LOCATION: Intersection of (new) Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PID: Outlot A Butternut Midge Addition, PID# 251550020 TOTAL ACREAGE: 116 - s B WETLANDS PRESENT: a YES NO PRESENT ZONING: Agricultural estate District REQUESTED ZONING: office and Institutional District PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Residential Low Density REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: office and Institutional REASON FOR REQUEST: Improve land to include development of a medical center, access road, store Pond, and allow for future development of a City lift station, sanitary sewer, and other necessary infrastructure. FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW: Include number of existing employees: and new employees: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Ownefs Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Tittle or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc, with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and infortation I have subnrdtic-d are true and c oncce - to the best of my knowledge. Si re of Applicant ftrifiture of Fee r Date 7 Date G_lpianifomalDevebpment Review Applicabon.DOC Rev. i= S C,n. r. N;_") T UNITED PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE SUPPLEMENT FOR POWERS CROSSING PROFESSIONAL CENTER CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Submitted On April 1, 2009 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED APR 0 2 2009 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Powers Crossing Professional Center April 1, 2009 Introduction On July 3, 2008, United Properties LLC, on behalf of Powers Crossing Medical LLC, a joint venture between Dawne and Timothy Erhart and United Properties Investment LLC, submitted a development application for a proposed medical office building located at the southeast corner of (new) Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard in Chanhassen, Minnesota. The building, as proposed, will be a two-phase, 160,000 sq. ft., medical office building. The first phase will be a three-story, 72,000 sq. ft. building with a two-story, 16,000 sq. ft. link on the north end, providing a total building area of 88,000 sq. ft. The link will eventually serve as the connection point to a matching three-story, 72,000 sq. ft. building in the second phase. Because the second phase depends on right-of-way along Highway 212 currently controlled by Mn/DOT, we request approval to transfer density from the phase two building and add a fourth story to the phase one building if Mn/DOT is unwilling to turn back this right-of-way. The end result would be a four-story, 112,000 sq. ft. building with parking built to City code requirements. On July 15, 2008, the City sent a written response to United Properties requesting justification for the variance requests contained in the original application. The three variances requested pertain to the Bluff Creek Overlay District, building height, and signage. Below are the justifications for each variance request addressing the criteria in Section 20-58 of the Chanhassen City Code for the first two variances and Section 20-1253 for the signage variance. Bluff Creek Overlay District On -site, we request a variance to grade and construct a driveway surface within the secondary zone of the Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOD). Off -site, south of the access road, we request a variance to construct a storm water detention pond and site for the City's lift station in the both the Primary and Secondary Zone of the BCOD. • Enforcement causes undue hardship. Because this is the first development of its nature in this area, no comparable properties exist within 500 feet to meet the Code's definition of "undue hardship." However, we believe this is a reasonable request given the somewhat arbitrary nature of the BCOD boundary line. • Conditions don't generally apply to property with same zoning classification. Throughout the City, properties with an Office and Institutional (OI) zoning classification which are not adjacent to the BCOD are not subject to the more restrictive development requirements of the BCOD. Moreover, grading within the primary and secondary BCOD zones will be necessary to complete the City's access road, and our plans are similar to the City's grading needs. • Variance is not driven by desire to increase value. We request this variance to effectively balance the needs of the City, the landowner, the developer, and the anchor tenant. • Hardship is not self-created. We do not believe this hardship is self-created. • Variance is not detrimental to public welfare. We believe the site studies submitted with our original application show that the variance requested will not be a detriment to public welfare. • Variance will not impair surrounding property. We believe the site studies submitted with our original application show that the variance requested will not impair surrounding property. Furthermore, the current landowner will retain ownership of United Properties LLC Professional Center 1, 2009 approximately 100 acres of undeveloped land. This landowner would not allow a development on 12% of the land to impair the remaining 88% of the property. Building Height The proposed phase one and phase two buildings (principle structures) are three stories high, and the phase two parking garage is three stories high with one additional level for proof of parking. As mentioned in the introduction above, we also request approval to transfer density from the phase two building and add a fourth story to the phase one building if Mn/DOT is unwilling to turn back this right-of-way. The end result would be a four-story, 112,000 sq. ft. building with parking built to City code requirements. The OI District allows for a maximum height of two stories for principal structures and one story for accessory structures. Because Community Development Department staff recommended rezoning the current site to the OI District, we request a variance from the height requirements. • Enforcement causes undue hardship. Because this is the first development of its nature in this area, no comparable properties exist within 500 feet to meet the Code's definition of "undue hardship." In fact, precisely because no properties exist within 500 feet, a height restriction could be seen as an undue hardship. • Conditions donY generally apply to property with same zoning classification. Given the parcel's fixed border created by Highway 212, Powers Boulevard, and the Bluff Creek Overlay District, we cannot expand the site to reduce the height of the buildings. Sites with the same zoning classification don't generally face a similar inability to expand. • Variance is not driven by desire to increase value. We request this variance to create sufficient space for medical providers to meet the demand for medical services from residents of Chanhassen and the surrounding area. • Hardship is not self-created. We do not believe this hardship is self-created. • Variance is not detrimental to public welfare. We believe the plans submitted with our original application show that the variance requested will not be a detriment to public welfare. • Variance will not impair surrounding property. We believe the plans submitted with our original application show that the variance requested will not impair surrounding property. The hills and forests surrounding this property act as a natural buffer to neighboring parcels. Slanaae In lieu of providing two monument signs, one for each building, we request a variance for consolidation to one monument sign with a combined area and height 95 percent larger than currently allowed in the OI District. As medical office buildings have signage needs more similar to retail than traditional office, we feel this will provide for the signage needs of the tenants while still holding to the spirit of City's signage requirements. The sign base will be constructed of similar materials used on the building to compliment the architecture. With the natural hills surrounding this property as well as the man-made hills from the construction of Highway 212, we believe the modest signage allowed by the City causes hardship when viewed in a topographical context. Additionally, since we regard this variance request as a consolidation of signage, rather than an upsizing, we believe our request does not United Properties LLC Powers Crossing Professional Center April 1, 2009 adversely affect the spirit or intent of the City's signage ordinance. Finally, we believe the requested variance creates the added benefits of reducing site clutter and enhancing public welfare by improving visibility for the elderly and medical patients in stressful, emergency situations United Properties LLC Powers Crossing Professional Center April 1, 2009 CONTACT INFORMATION Developer and Fee Owner Representative United Properties LLC As agent for Powers Crossing Medical LLC 3500 American Boulevard West Minneapolis, MN 55431 Attention: Bill Katter 952.837.8525 1 Phone 952.893.8206 1 Fax william.katter@uproperties.com Architect Pope Associates, Inc. 1255 Energy Park Drive St. Paul, MN 55108-5118 Attention: Paul Holmes 651.789.1582 1 Phone 651.642.1101 1 Fax pholmes@popearch.com Civil Engineer Westwood Professional Services 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Attention: Dan Parks 952.906.7435 1 Phone 952.937.5822 1 Fax dan.parks@westwoodps.com United Properties LLC September 4, 2008 W City of Chanhassen Planning Department City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Westwood PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Fairview Chanhassen Medical Center — Response to City Comment Letter (Planning Case #08-16) File 20061094.01 Dear Planning Department: We R,A,.d rralH:lOnal SeMAes 7699 Anagram Drne Eden frame. MN 553d6 MAIN 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL FREE 14ME-9�337...--A5..11�50 EMAIL V4.0.psWMxxJps 111 Meg wesltMioodpsmm CITY OF CHANHASSEN RFrpIVFD APR 0 2 2009 CHA*IASSEN PLANNMG DEPT Westwood staff has reviewed the city comment letter dated 07/15/08 for the above - referenced project. Responses to each comment are provided below, and the submittal documents have been revised to address the issues. We believe that the plans and submittal materials are now complete and would appreciate your consideration in scheduling this project for the earliest available City of Chanhassen Planning Commission agenda. VARIANCE Variance requests require that the applicant provide, via narrative, a justification for each variance request addressing the criteria of Section 20-58 of the Chanhassen CityCode. The variances include building height and encroachment into and setback from the Bluff Creek primary zone. The sign variance request should address the criteria in section 20-1253 of the Chanhassen City Code. A narrative has been created by United Properties that addresses justification for the variances. This narrative is under a separate cover within the submittal package. SITE PLAN • The parking ramp must beset back at least 35 feet from the future ramp right-of- way. The buildings and traffic circulation need to be shifted to the south. The parking structure has been shifted south to accommodate this request. Refer to the architectural and civil plans for clarity. • The site plan should incorporate an interim landscape buffer plan for the Phase I project perimeter. A Phase 1 Landscape Plan has been created and inserted into the civil plan set to address this comment. - - TWIN CITIESIMETRO ST. CLOUD BRAINERD SCANNED September 4, 2008 Page 2 ". • Eliminate the sidewalk to Powers Boulevard and replace with sidewalks to the access road and the trail adjacent to the Highway 312 ramp as part of Phase 2. The sidewalk to Powers Boulevard has been eliminated and a sidewalk has been O°d extended to the access road. These changes are reflected in both the architectural plans and the civil plans. • Trees on the landscape plan are shown down the middle of the trail near the off ramp of Highway 311. The landscape plan has been revised to show trees and plantings south of the trail near Highway 312. • A swale of 2% is required west of the parking garage. The grading plan has been revised to show a 2% swale. • Show truck turning template for appropriate size delivery trucks. Truck turning movement graphics have been created for city delivery trucks at the 4' dock as well as movements for a WB-50 in clock- and counter -clock -wise directions around the main building. • Switch the location of the sanitary sewer with the water main location on the east side of the building, or move the sanitary to the west side of the building. Switching the water and sanitary locations create difficulties in maintaining a 10 foot horizontal separation between water and sanitary & storm sewers. The utility plan was not revised to show this request. • Maintain 10 feet of separation between storm, sanitary, and water main. A 10 foot separation has been accommodated between water and storm and water and sanitary sewers. Sanitary and storm sewer may be closer than 10 feet in some locations. • Proof ofparking is shown on land not currently owned by the applicant. Provide from MNDOT a time frame for the proposed turn back of the right-of-way to be incorporated in the project. We have contacted Keith McMurray at MNDOT and discussed the time line of reconveyance on two separate occasions. MNDOT acknowledges that we have an official request into them (#2007-0085) and that it is in their system. We understand that the reconveyance review process has been started, but at this time is not complete. Mr. McMurray stated that the reconveyance of property would not happen until this fall or later. We will update the City of Chanhassen as we receive new information from MNDOT. - -. planning > engineering > surveying September 4, 2008 Page 3 W • The building acreage and property access exhibit, sheet SKP06, does not provide a permissible nor feasible access to the area between Lot 1, Block 1 and the wetland located to the east of the lot. The driveway shown to access the remnant Westwood piece is unbuildable. Since there is no legitimate access, this area may not be used in determination off tture density. Comment noted. The SKP06 exhibit has been removed from the submittal materials. • Chanhassen City Code requires that the primary zone be composed of 100 percent open space. The areas within the Bluff Creek Primary Zone shall be incorporated within separate outlots or be covered by a conservation easement. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 463.358, subd. 2a, the regulations shall require that subdivisions be consistent with the municipality's official map if one exists and it's zoning ordinance, and may require consistency with other official controls and the comprehensive plan. The property owner will work with the city in crafting a conservation easement over the subject areas. • The grading plan should be revised to reduce the impacts to trees and within the Bluff Creek Primary Zone. Grading has been reduced in the storm pond area by providing a retaining wall. Refer to the grading plan for details. • A tree removal calculation shall be provided for the development contained with this project. Tree removal calculations are provided on the Phase 2 landscape plan. A shaded line has been added to the plan to clarify the area used for calculating canopy coverage. • Street profile should be shown on the same sheet as the sanitary sewer profile. Also include horizontal curve information. The access road profile is shown on the sanitary sewer profile graphic. Horizontal curve information is provided. • The roadway should be constructed to the east property line of the proposed Fairview parcel and a temporary cul-de-sac should be provided. The plans have been revised to show a temporary cul-de-sac meeting the City's design guidelines. e s r a 6 s e e n N• planning > engineering > surveying September 4, 2008 Page 4 W • Provide a minimum of a 4-foot median near the entrance to Powers Boulevard along with a left turn lane into the Fairview site. The plans have been revised to show a 6.67 foot wide median at the intersection of Westwood the access road and Powers Boulevard. • Narrow the roadway to a 36 foot maximum east of the second access into Fairview. The plans have been revised to show a 36 foot road width east of the second access. Forcemain location must be shown north of the site. The plans have been revised to show the sanitary forcemain running along the south side of the access road to the east. The forcemain crosses the access road and then heads north, adjacent to the lake/pond. • Lift station pad must line up with the existing sanitary line. Access shall be provided off of Powers Boulevard. The plans have been revised to meet this request. • Pond dead storage is insufcient. The applicant should investigate directing the drainage from north of the developed site in such a manner as to bypass the pond thereby minimizing the need for additional dead storage. The pond has been enlarged slightly to provide sufficient dead storage. The east drainage is routed through the pond; a bypass is not necessary and is not included in the design. See the attached Preliminary Storm Water Report for detailed analysis and calculations. • Maximum pond depth is 10 feet. The pond depth has been adjusted to reflect a 10 foot maximum depth. • Provide full-size drainage maps showing entire drainage areas. Full-size drainage maps have been attached to the revised storm water report. Drainage maps do not match drainage calculations. Drainage maps and calculations have been revised to match each other. • Street grade within 30 feet of Powers Boulevard must be less than or equal to 39'0. Access road grade within 30 feet of Powers Boulevard has been adjusted to meet this criterion. .: planning > engineering > surveying September 4, 2008 Page 5 W • The subdivision cannot plat the property that is currently owned by MnDOT. The preliminary plat has been revised to include only the property currently owned by the applicant. Westwood • Show drainage and utility easements on the preliminary plat. Drainage and utility easements have been provided on the preliminary plat. • Provide snow storage for the trail along the Highway 312 off ramp and along the access road. Snow storage has been provided for the trail along the Highway 312 off ramp and along the access road. • A street light is needed at the intersection of Powers Boulevard and the access road. The lighting and photometric plan has been revised to show a street light at the intersection of the access road and Powers Boulevard. • Applicant needs to maintain existing drainage patterns as shown on Overview Map #3 prepared by MnDOT for the TH 312 design/build which was supplied by the City to Westwood on July 1, 2008. Drainage previously/currently directed to the west side of Powers Boulevard is shown to be directed down ditch on the east side of Powers Boulevard without any calculations showing the ability of the receiving water to handle this discharge. Existing drainage patterns, as currently in place, have been maintained. Currently drainage flows south along the east side of Powers Boulevard. Drainage then flows beneath Powers, east to west, via a 24" RCP pipe. Proposed storm water discharges from the Fairview are less than or equal to existing storm water runoff rates from the site. • Applicant needs to show outlet for the water body south of the Highway 312 on ramp north of the subject property. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan has been revised to show this outlet • The applicant is strongly encouraged to employ storm water storage and treatment below the parking lot in order to minimize the necessary pond size, thereby minimizing impacts within the primary zone. This water can be used for irrigation purposes. Comment noted and will be considered by the applicant. • Provide adequate erosion/sediment controls consistent with the NPDES Construction permit and the City of Chanhassen 's standards. This includes, but e I !Is i . _ : c planning > engineering > surveying September 4, 2008 Page 6 is not limited to: W ■ Installation ofsiltfenee down gradient of all disturbed soils. Westwood ■ Installation of a rock construction entrance with a minimum length of 75 feet. ■ Stabilization of all channels for at least the f nal 100 feet prior to discharge of site or into the storm sewer infrastructure. ■ Placement of ditch checks within the existing ditch in existing Drainage Area 2. Erosion and sediment control measures will be outlined in a SWPPP that will be included with construction level drawings. • A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan will be required. A SWPPP will be included with construction level drawings. TRAFFIC STUDY Attached to this letter is a memo written by our traffic engineering staff that address the following four comments in addition to comments from NMOT and Carver County. • Update trafJlc counts to current county estimates. Get traffic model from Carver County. • Traffic report states that a traffic signal is required. Carver County spacing guidelines are not met at this location. Discussions between MnDOT, Carver County, and the City are needed to see if a trafJ4c signal can be installed at this location. • Development will occur on the opposite side of this proposed access road. Has this been taken into account in the traffic report? Ifso, what are your assumptions? • What happens to the intersection on the Highway 101 side in the year 2020 when this area is fully developed? WETLANDS Please refer to the previously submitted and approved wetland delineation report dated August 2006 for the subject property. This report addresses the wetland comments below. ... _ planning > engineering > surveying September 4, 2008 Page 7 W The applicant needs to clearly indicate all delineated wetland boundaries including the date the delineation was completed and the entity performing the delineation. The City reserves the right to verify the wetland boundaries per Minnesota Rules 8420 Westwood and may request that a portion or all of the wetland boundaries are re -staked as existing conditions may have been significantly altered since the original delineation was performed. • The applicant needs to clearly indicate all wetland buffers. • The applicant needs to clearly indicate all wetland setbacks. • The applicant needs to clearly indicate the wetland mitigation area. Please contact me if you have any questions, would like to discuss any of the issues above in further detail, and when this project has been scheduled for the next available Planning Commission agenda. Sincerely, WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES x4e�� Ryan M. Edstrom, PE Attachments Cc: File Denton Mack — Pope Associates Tim Erhart — Exlar Bill Katter — United Properties e z: n a L i a"a a - planning > engineering > surveying MEMORANDUM ". Date: September 4, 2008 Re: Chanhassen Medical Office Development Traffic Study O°d File 20061094 To: City of Chanhassen Planning Department From: Bruce Boje Nicholas J. Erpelding, P.E., PTOE v BSBIA d P 0185 Iw SRIIIIM 7699 An Nr Dm Eden Wane. NN 553" ueix 952-937-SISO 952.937-5822 IGu im 1$8&937-5150 e NUL 11l9wesMmdpLCM www.INtlnwR}R_NR In response to your July 15'h, 2008 comments regarding Westwood's July P Traffic Study, we offer the following responses. Comment 1: Update traffic counts to current county estimates. Get traffic model from Carver County. ADTs from MNDOT were used in the model. Response: Westwood contacted Mr. Roger Gustafson with Carver County to request the most recent estimates on Tuesday, July 291h. After following Mr. Gustafson's direction to contact SRF Consulting Group, a response was received from SRF as follows: Please find the attached scan with forecast volumes from the Carver County Transportation Plan. As you will see, only one volume is given on Powers in your study area, and would apply to the entire segment between Lyman and Pioneer. The volumes shown here represent the preferred scenario for the County plan, which is the "State + County Improvements". Other scenarios include forecasts ranging from 18,000 to 21,000 vpd on Powers in this location. Please note that these forecasts do not take into consideration two significant land uses near this site: 1) the new high school being built on the north side of Lyman just west of Audubon, and 2) a proposed shopping mall near the intersection of Lyman and Powers. I hope this information helps. Please let me know if anything else comes up. Paul Paul Morris Transportation Engineer SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Along with the following sketch: i IN CITIESMETRO St CLOUD BRAINERD September 4, 2008 Page 2 ". Figure 1: SRF/Carver County Preliminary 2030 ADT forecasts Westwood®CONSULTING GROUP, INC. SS63 www.sdconsalling_com I AI Fs M14751Q5 Comm. Na ('g,syr Cerw}y Tr..jport t+ew Pjon Sheet 1 of / �1� By P.,,1 M. oat, 7/0r/e9 Computation for 2050 O!!tX Fvr cwt V.lew.s Checked by Date M 212 L/1 8,400 18 ru 2tz vs TI 212 Eg +— — — — Ncw Acc.rs 0 9, too I 17, 700 As noted by SRF, the ADT forecasts completed are general in nature, with only one ADT forecast for the entire Powers Boulevard segment from Lyman Boulevard on the north to Pioneer Trail on the south. (It should also be noted that these preliminary E 5 T a B l IS HE D i rJ planning > engineering > surveying September 4, 2008 Page 3 �`. forecasts do not yet appear to have been formally published as part of the County's Comprehensive Plan update.) uvestwood The SRF forecast of 19,600 ADT for this segment of Powers Boulevard in 2030 appears consistent with the Westwood's projected year 2020 ADT range of 16,900 to 21,800 shown on Figure 8 of the report. Comment 2: Traffic report states that a traffic signal is required. Carver County spacing guidelines are not met at this location. Discussions between MnDOT, Carver County, and the City are needed to see if a traffic signal can be installed at this location. Response: The 2003 Kimley-Horn Chanhassen AUAR includes no discussion of the operations of this intersection. The report does indicate on Figure 11 that side street stop control is proposed for the intersection, which was analyzed as a "T" intersection (the O/east leg was not included). Westwood's July 3d traffic report notes that based solely on level of service, a traffic signal would be required concurrent with Phase 2 development in order to prevent the exiting left turn movement from dropping to an unacceptable LOS. Though the comment was made that a traffic signal would be "required," it was made with the understanding that one would not be installed until it was fully warranted and justified. In the metro area, it is common for a side street stop controlled intersection to operate with failing side street movements during peak times. Such intersections can and do remain side street stop controlled indefinitely. The appropriate course of action is to monitor the intersection as traffic volumes grow to determine if and when changes in intersection control should be made. To further assess when traffic volumes at the intersection might necessitate installation of a traffic signal, additional analysis was undertaken. The turning movement volumes forecasted in the report were compared with the traffic volume warrants for the installation of a traffic signal identified in the current Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD). planning > engineering > surveying Westwood September 4, 2008 Page 4 Table 1 Wan -ant Analysis Summary Warrant Hours Required: Hours Met: 2010 No -Build 2010 Build 2012 Build 2020 Build (Phase 1) (Phase 2) Phase 3a Phase 3b IA 8 2 2 2 2 2 1B 8 7 7 7 7 7 1C 8 1 1 1 1 1 2 14 16 16 6 6 6 3 11 4 15 5 5 5 Assumptions: 1. Based on peak hour volumes in July 3, 2008 Traffic Analysis Report 2. Hourly variation assumed from MnDOT ATR 458 (2007 volumes). 3. Right turn volumes excluded. 4. 0.70 factor applied (located on high speed roadway - 40 MPH+). 5. 2+ approach lanes for both Powers Boulevard and Site Collector Roadway. The results documented in Table 1 show that the amount of traffic contributing toward the fulfillment of signal warrants remains nearly constant as development of the subject site proceeds from vacant through full build. This is explained by the fact that the primary generator of traffic contributing toward fulfillment of signal wan -ants is development to the west of Powers Boulevard, not development on the subject site. (As is noted in the response to comment 3, below, full development of the Chanhassen AUAR site to the west of Powers Boulevard was assumed by 2010.) To further assess what contribution traffic from the subject site has toward fulfillment of signal warrants, the analysis was updated with the assumption that the site to the west remains vacant. With this assumption, in contrast, the number of hours each warrant is met increases as development proceeds. At full build out, the number of hours for which warrants are met is just below that of the 2010 No -Build scenario in Table 1. This confirms that traffic from the subject site is not the primary contributor to the need for signalization. _ , . planning > engineering > surveying September 4, 2008 Page 5 Table 2 Warrant Analysis Summary — No development west of Powers Boulevard Warrant Hours Required: Hours Met: 2010 Build 2012 Build 2020 Build (Phase 1) (Phase 2) Phase 3a Phase 3b IA 8 0 0 2 0 1B 8 0 4 7 4 1C 8 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 2 6 3 3 1 10 1 1 4 2 Assumptions: 1. Based on peak hour volumes in July 3, 2008 Traffic Analysis Report 2. Hourly variation assumed from MnDOT ATR 458 (2007 volumes). 3. Right turn volumes excluded. 4. 0.70 factor applied (located on high speed roadway - 40 MPH+). 5. 2+ approach lanes for both Powers Boulevard and Site Collector Roadway. 6. Assumes no adjacent development west of Powers Blvd. It is further noted that in the metro area, an intersection must typically meet more than one warrant in order justify installation of a traffic signal. This is due to in partto delay increasing for the mainline and the increased potential for mainline rear end collisions. Based on the analysis completed, traffic volumes at the intersection will be close but may not fully justify installation of a traffic signal through full build out of the site in 2020. Noting that a signal was forecast to be necessary in terms of level of service concurrent with Phase 2 in 2012, the intersection would be expected to operate at poor LOS during peak times with good LOS the remainder (and majority) of the day. Access Spacing The intersection of Powers Boulevard and Site Collector Roadway does not meet the prescribed full access spacing of/4 mile along Powers Boulevard, as identified on the figure on page 4.39 in the most current version of the Carver County Comprehensive Plan. With approximately 820 feet of spacing provided, center -to -center, it falls 500 feet, or 38% short. It is Westwood's understanding that the location of this intersection was selected during design of the TH 212 project to best fit with the natural topography and wetland constraints. While it is true that full %4 mile spacing is not met at the chosen location, it represents a workable compromise location. Without having completed a formal analysis of the corridor, but based on experience with similar situations, it is e 5 rG s - planning > engineering > surveying September 4, 2008 Page 6 ". anticipated that signal timing and phasing plans can be developed to accommodate the selected intersection location without compromising the operational integrity of the Powers Boulevard corridor. Westwood Other noteworthy considerations include the fact that the Site Collector Roadway intersection is the only intersection proposed in the roadway segment between the TH 212 south ramps and Pioneer Trail just under ''/z mile to the south feet to the south. Because this segment is less than % mile in length, no access location will be able to provide the necessary full 'Amile spacing required on both resulting segments. Finally, a 4-lane roadway section with turn lanes such proposed for this stretch of Powers Boulevard is typically capable of carrying over 40,000 ADT. 2030 volume forecasts are in the 20,000 ADT range, meaning a substantial capacity cushion is likely to exist. Comment 3: Development will occur on the opposite side of this proposed access road. Has this been taken into account in the traffic report? If so, what are your assumptions? Response: As noted on page 1 of the Westwood Traffic Report, "The Chanhassen 2005 Alternative Urban Area -Wide Review (AUAR) prepared in 2003 for the City of Chanhassen by the consultant team of Hoisington Koegler Group Inc., Kimley Hom and Associates, Peterson Environmental Consulting, 106 Group and HDR was used in the determination of background traffic volumes and traffic assignment process." Full build of the Chanhassen AUAR area was assumed by 2010, as assumed in the Chanhassen AUAR. The turning movement volume illustrations, Figures 5-8, reflect this assumption. Comment 4: What happens to the intersection on the Highway 101 side in the year 2020 when this area is fully developed? Response: The traffic study completed is intended to provide support for Phases 1 and 2 of the proposed development only. This includes the two medical office buildings located immediately adjacent to Powers Boulevard south of the TH 212 ramps. Consideration of development of a Phase 3 was done only to gauge anticipated future traffic conditions at intersections impacted by Phase 1 and 2 development, not to provide a full analysis of the impacts of Phase 3 development. e s r A s u s H e n 1 14 a n planning > engineering > surveying September 4, 2008 Page 7 "• Due to the small magnitude of development proposed for Phases 1 and 2, a full analysis of the impacts of the extension of the site collector roadway to CSAH 101 was uvestwood not undertaken. The report does note (in Figure 4) that only 5% of the site generated traffic from the subject medical office site is forecast to use the extension to connect to CSAH 101. This 5% would amount to fewer than 300 trips per day, well below the often -used 1,000 ADT minimum threshold for detailed study. It is anticipated that detailed study of the Site Collector roadway extension to CSAH 101 will be completed at the time formal development plans for Phase 3 are put forth. planning > engineering > surveying CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JUL 0 3 2008 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Chanhassen Fairview Medical Center Site Traffic Analysis Chanhassen, Minnesota July 3, 2008 Prepared by WWestwood Professional Services, Inc. SCANNED INTRODUCTION The purpose of this traffic analysis is to assess the traffic implications of the proposed development on the Fairview Medical Center site in what will be the southeast quadrant of the Powers Boulevard / T.H. 312 intersection in the City of Chanhassen. The proposed site is presently undeveloped, with Powers Blvd. to be extended south from Lyman Blvd. to Pioneer Trail with construction of the new T.H. 312 ramps on Powers Blvd. The development location is shown in Figure 1, along with the planned roadway network in the area. The Chanhassen 2005 Alternative Urban Area -Wide Review (AUAR) prepared in 2003 for the City of Chanhassen by the consultant team of Hoisington Koegler Group Inc., Kimley Hom and Associates, Peterson Environmental Consulting, 106 Group and HDR was used in the determination of background traffic volumes and traffic assignment process. The development is comprised of approximately 65 acres of proposed office and residential land uses, summarized in Table 1 below. It will be built in three phases, the first two of which will construct the medical office building. Two possible scenarios were considered for Phase 3: a combination of general office and single-family residential or medium -density residential only. A detailed site plan is shown in Figure 2. Table 1 Land Use Characteristics Phase - Scenario Land Use Size Phase 1 Medical Office Building 88,000 SF Phase 2 Medical Office Building 72,000 SF Phase 3 — Scenario A General Office 250,000 SF Single -Family Residential 35 DU OR Phase 3 — Scenario B Medium -Density Residential 390 DU Traffic analyses were performed for projected year 2010 volume conditions (one year after completion of Phase 1), 2012 (one year after completion of Phase 2) and 2020 (one year after full build -out) for Phase 3 — Scenarios A and B. Table 2 Traffic Analysis Scenarios Year No -Build Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 2010 X X 2012 X X X 2020 X X X X Page 1 Three intersections were analyzed: • Powers Blvd. & the Site Collector road, analyzed for both unsignalized and signalized intersection control and • two unsignalized intersections on the Site Collector road that provide access to the medical office building for Phases 1 and 2 of the development. The proposed roadway geometry is shown in Figure 2. The intersection of Powers Blvd. and the Site Collector will be the sole access to the development for horizon years 2010 and 2012. (The AUAR assumes that a west leg will be constructed opposite the site access but no east leg. The east side of the AUAR analysis area ended at Powers Blvd.) There are two site driveways off the Site Collector, the West Site Entrance allowing easy access to the surface parking to the west of the medical building as well as to the parking ramp and the East Site Entrance providing more direct access to the parking ramp. Along the south side of the west driveway intersection with the Site Collector, the shoulder is planned to be wide enough to allow eastbound through vehicles to by-pass one or two vehicles waiting for an opportunity to turn left into the medical complex. The internal East Site Entrance is planned to extend to connect with Highway 101 to the east with construction of Phase 3 by 2020. Page 2 Figure 1 Development Location A - s tot L,., ..roll Palk CE .lY � J �. � � •. LfT S• ...._ ' n - — Power Lake. Susan Ni Prk I. i West Pan 4 f s J Ch ' a S s Cea+lnielily Prk Site Location I �Pa , TIWT,W � A01Md Page 3 �1M .4Ma •'1WC tl -MIA- kill p1M . iTL - 8913 frr `09.J STORM WATER POND i I _ ANALYSIS OF FUTURE CONDITIONS The future conditions with the development in place were analyzed using a traditional multi -step traffic forecast and analysis process. The major steps in this process include: • determining background traffic volumes, • developing trip generation, • deriving the direction of approach, • assigning site generated traffic to the surrounding roadway network, • analyzing development -related traffic impacts, and • establishing mitigation strategies. Analysis Scenarios Traffic analyses were performed for three phases of construction, the third of which has two potential land use scenarios: • Phase I — initial construction of the medical office building • Phase 2 — completion of medical office building construction • Phase 3 — full build -out of the site with the addition of: Scenario A — 250,000 SF office space plus 35 single family detached dwelling units or Scenario B — 390 medium -density residential condominium / townhouse dwelling units Traffic Volumes To obtain data for assessing operations for Powers Blvd. at the site entrance, background volumes were first developed for the 3 analysis years based on data published in the Chanhassen 2005 AUAR. The AUAR included volume forecasts for the north, south and west legs of the intersection. No forecasts of traffic were developed for the east leg. (See Appendix Memorandum A-1 for a description of the procedure used to develop the background volumes.) The background volumes are shown for the years 2010, 2012 and 2020 on Figures 5, 6 and 7. Trip Generation The trip generation rates utilized in this study are those documented in the reference book Trio Generation 7th Edition, 2003, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table 3 summarizes the weekday daily, A.M. peak hour and P.M. peak hour trip rates utilized for this study. Page 5 Table 3 Trip Generation Rates I.T.E. Rates Distribution Dail Y A.M. P.M. A.M. A.M. P.M. P.M. Code Land Use Per % In % Out % In % Out 720 Medical Office KSF 36.13 2.48 3.72 79 21 27 73 Building 710 General Office KSF 11.01 1.55 1.49 88 12 17 83 Building 210 Single -Family DU 9.57 0.75 1.01 25 75 63 37 Detached Housing 230 Condominium / DU 1 5.86 0.44 0.52 17 83 67 33 Townhouse Table 4 summarizes the overall gross trip generation. No reductions were taken for internally - captured, multi -purpose or pass -by trips for the proposed office and residential land uses. Table 4 Gross Trip Generation Approx. Trips Phase Land Use Dev. A.M. A.M. A.M. P.M. P.M. P.M. Daily Units In Out Total In Out Total Total I Medical 88 KSF 172 46 218 88 239 327 3,180 Office Bldjz. 2 Medical 72 KSF 141 38 179 72 196 268 2 602 Office Bld .. ...... .............................................. . ...................... Total, Phases 1 & 2 313 84 397 160 435 595 5,782 3 Scenario A General Office 250 KSF 341 47 388 63 310 373 2,754 Bldg. Single -Family 1 35 DU 7 19 26 22 13 35 336 Det. Housing Total, Phases 1 2 & 3-A 661 150 811 245 758 1,003 8,872 Or Scenario B Condominium 390 DU 29 142 171 2,286 / Townhouse I136 I67 I203 ............................................................................................................................................... Total, Phases 1, 2 & 3-B 342 226 568 256 502 758 8,068 Page 6 Trip Distribution A large percentage of traffic generated from the development area will utilize T.H. 312 to the east and west and Powers Blvd. to the north and south. With construction of Phase 3, traffic generated here will also utilize the connection of the Site Collector road through to Highway 101 to the east. This trip distribution, or direction of approach, for the development traffic is shown on Figure 3 for Phases 1 and 2 and on Figure 4 for the Phase 3 scenarios. This distribution is based on data contained in the AUAR and traffic patterns expected in the area. The majority of Phase 3 traffic is expected to be oriented towards Highway 101. Trip Assignment and Traffic Analysis In the trip assignment portion of the analysis, the new trips generated from the development area were assigned to the roadway network using the routing patterns expected to be employed by the future employees, visitors and residents. The organization and tabulation of the trip assignment was facilitated by use of an Excel spreadsheet designed to carry out the traffic assignment process across the study area network. Total trips — background traffic plus site -generated trips — for each of the four analysis cases are shown on Figures 5 through 8. Timeframes for Traffic Assignment Traffic analyses were performed for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours for 2010 (one year after opening of the initial phase of construction of the medical office building), 2012 (one year after opening of Phase 2 of the medical office building) and 2020 (one year after full build -out). Page 7 Figure 3 Trip Distribution — Phases 1 & 2 w Sr R� c, Lake Swan aik.. Mi'W 'Psrlc 1 . Jl & Bantimere ComnwWy"P f Ala f I r 76% J C7—w sea+ St 24% ftfead M�fN rye �� W Poneer Trej Page 8 Figure 4 Trip Distribution — 2020 with Connection to Highway 101 Waft Mr. Banchmere Commurvty P 5% / 70% lj220%/o,/ / 23% 7% Key: Phases 1 & 2 / Phase 3 sted 1� M fiP�oneer Trar Mlf � T Page 9 Powers Blvd. and Site Collector A series of A.M. and P.M. peak hour traffic analyses were conducted for the three study intersections using the planned roadway geometry and stop -sign intersection control for the four analysis cases in 2010, 2012 and 2020. (Volumes for each of the analysis cases are shown on Figures 5, 6 and 8.) Analyses were first performed for the A.M. and P.M. peak hour No -Build conditions for the Powers Blvd. / Site Collector intersection. These No -Build volumes are shown on Figures 5 through 8. Results are shown on Table 5 below, which shows the average seconds of delay per vehicle along with the corresponding Level of Service (LOS) for the critical stopped movement at the intersection. (Appendix Table A-1 shows the LOS letter grades with their corresponding levels of delay. Results for all intersections in all scenarios are shown by movement in Appendix Tables A-2 — A-4.) In addition, analyses were performed for the four Build cases. No -Build conditions resulted in LOS B or C for all three analysis years. With construction of Phase 1, the eastbound left movement for traffic generated by the development to the west of Powers Blvd. across from the Chanhassen Fairview Medical Center site is projected to experience LOS "E" in the A.M. peak hour and LOS "F" in the P.M. peak hour. For Phase 2, LOS "E" is projected for both the eastbound and westbound left turns in the A.M. peak hour, while LOS "F" is projected in the P.M. peak hour. LOS "F" is projected for both left turn movements for all subsequent phases with this intersection under stop sign control. Based on the results of stop sign analysis of the forecasted traffic volumes, a traffic signal will be required when traffic volumes reach Phase 2 levels in order to safely accommodate left turners exiting the site. Further analysis was conducted for this intersection with signal control in place. As shown in Table 6, results are LOS "B" or borderline `B-C" for all scenarios under those conditions. Page 10 Table 5 Powers Blvd & Site Collector Stop Sign Controlled Intersection Analysis Critical Movement LOS (1) Analysis Scenario West Leg (Critical Movement: Eastbound Left) East Leg (Critical Movement: Westbound Left A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 2010 No -Build 15 / B-C 21 / C N/A N/A 2010 Phase 1 48 / E 101 / F 36 / E 32 / D 2012 No -Build 15 / B-C 21 / C N / A N / A 2012 Phases 1 & 2 39 / E / F 46 / E 136 / F 2020 No -Build 18 / C 23 / C N / A N / A 2020 Phases 1, 2 & 3-A / F / F / F / F 2020 Phases 1, 2 & 3-B / F M/ F 138 / F / F Key: NN.N / X = Delay in Seconds per Vehicle / Level of Service (') Delay and LOS were determined by the SimTraffic analysis program; results are rounded to the nearest whole number (2) Delay value as rounded to the nearest whole number falls at the threshold between 2 LOS ratings (') SimTraffic does not calculate realistic delay when intersection is highly overloaded Table 6 Powers Blvd & Site Collector Signalized Intersection Analyysis Overall Intersection LOS io Analysis Scenario A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 2010 Phase 1 11 / B 15 / B 2012 Phases 1 & 2 14 / B 17 / B 2020 Phases 1, 2 & 3-A 16 / B 20 / B-C (2) 2020 Phases 1, 2 & 3-13 14 / B 18 / B Key: NN.N / X = Delay in Seconds per Vehicle / Level of Service (') Delay and LOS were determined by the Synchro analysis program; results are rounded to the nearest whole number (2) Delay value as rounded to the nearest whole number falls at the threshold between 2 LOS ratings Internal Site Driveways Analyses conducted for the internal site driveways show that they will be able to function well under all scenarios. LOS results, shown in Tables 7 and 8 below, are primarily "A" and "B" in both peak hours, with a borderline "B-C" in the P.M. peak hour for the West Site Access under Phase 3 — Scenario A conditions. Page 11 Table 7 Site Collector & West Site Access Stop Sign Controlled Intersection Analysis Critical Movement LOS ttl Analysis Scenario Critical Movement A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak I Hour 2010 No -Build N / A N/A 2010 Phase 1 SBR 2/ A I 3/ A 2012 No -Build N / A N/A 2012 Phases 1& 2 SBR 2/ A I 4/ A 2020 No -Build N / A N/A 2020 Phases 1, 2 & 3-A SBL 15 / B-C 11 / B 2020 Phases 1, 2& 3-B SBL 6/ A 8/ A Key: NN.N / X = Delay in Seconds per Vehicle / Level of Service ") Delay and LOS were determined by the SimTraffic analysis program; results are rounded to the nearest whole number (2) Delay value as rounded to the nearest whole number falls at the threshold between 2 LOS ratings Table 8 Site Collector & East Site Access Stop Sign Controlled Intersection Analysis Critical Movement LOS (t) Analysis Scenario Critical Movement A.M. Peak III P.M. Peak I Hour 2010 No -Build N / A N/A 2010 Phase 1 SBR 2/ A I 3/ A 2012 No -Build N / A N/A 2012 Phases 1& 2 SBR 3/ A I 4/ A 2020 No -Build N / A N/A 2020 Phases 1, 2& 3-A SBL 4/ A 1 9/ A 2020 Phases 1, 2 & 3-B SBL 10 / A-B 6 / A Key: NN.N / X = Delay in Seconds per Vehicle / Level of Service o> Delay and LOS were determined by the SimTraffic analysis program; results are rounded to the nearest whole number (2) Delay value as rounded to the nearest whole number falls at the threshold between 2 LOS ratings QUEUEING ANALYSIS A queue length analysis was performed using SimTraffic for intersection approaches of interest. The analysis was conducted to determine whether the 95`" percentile queues would be accommodated in the available storage for turn lanes and between the driveways and intersections. The 2020 worst -case scenario was tested, with the total volumes forecasted for Phases 1, 2 and 3-A. Page 12 As shown in Table 9, the available storage was adequate for all movements in the worst case scenario. Table 9 95`" Percentile Queue Length Analysis ct) 2020 Phase 3 — Worst -Case Scenario A Powers Blvd. & Site Site Collector & West Site Site Collector & Location Collector Entr. East Site Entr. g 0 0 ab o Q 4)O 3 4)A 3 O w N w 3 A w d 3 z Available Storage 270 290 215 215 200+ 30 215 138 200+ 138 200+ A.M. Peak Hour 217 36 46 32 42 46 26 4 41 39 3 P.M.Peak 155 35 102 100 77 47 24 4 62 9 0 Hour (1) Queue lengths determined by SimTraffic analysis program; lengths are given in feet Page 13 X NOT TO SCALE 171 29J htr' 53 91 w �o//eotor 2010 No -Build Erhart Site i� — OW Average Daly Trams Volume 000 AM Peak Hour Tramc Volume 000 PM Peak Hour TrafficVolume Study Area R.WAW ----- site sm lary 2010 Build G 8 N N c W m m IT r V% $ ^ 35 182 ---- - ---, .. ✓ l 4 r 11 57 Q w Site C 171 29 J 'h t r' o// ectorLn i 53 91 V � 23 12044 p r, �N 86_0 ra 44 86. tr. �j 4 g 44 861 s y 1 t re 7 w VladoMnAreWMoftwift D&AWfa+ank Erhart umhamftmm MKM in- - Medical Office Site FAX 4M Touxug: twanTsiw YMMtwood wnr.meaeAr Chanhassen, Minnesota n ri] aig,K 5 ruse 7/1/08 2010 No -Build & 2010 Build Traffic Volumes Volumes.dwg soar yw. P.aeviurs .n X N D NOT TO SCALE w 33 171 29 J el t r' 53 9� `-O tector 0 2012 No -Build 2012 Build Lew& 000 AM Peak Hour Traffic Vok w OW PM Pmk Hour TretMCVokime Study Arm Roadway -- Site Boundary a C c W d) N cc WLI �o m m I m o i Erhart Site c0 • c M40 ae�a 171 29 J 53 91 jcnW � m d L64 332 r 20 103 _w �� - 4 site LU 1 t r' Coll ect 4f i � 42 2� , _� N4 80l5y titr+ 80 1 t Z w nWAn%.a,r&ft_ =..e,w Erhart nW- yBow IR Medical Office Site at ss_wy_ w TgLRiB'. 1•esenatw Mfrlwpod nnanosjae* Chanharen, Mtnnnaft G Figum 6 Uwe 71VO8 2012 No -Build & 2012 Build Traffic Volumes Volumes.dwa ri 0 � O NOT TO SCALE ti W a 171 29 J 4) t � 53 9 7 `� �o/lector 0 2020 No -Build M/.lwoed l rl:.,,ft Nc Erhart ann D Fbrl Yreid4 t.Vi 553U M-,7i10 w Medical Office Site FM M-w-sw TOLL RIEE 140.93T�eo u� weird www.wnwodµmm chanbaeeea, Minnesota WIZA 000 AM Peak Hour Trafic Vdunae 000 PM Peak Hour Traffic Vduw Study Area Roadway — — — — — Site Boundary I c j m I I w d) I � I Mm w 0 aim 7 Date 7/1/08 2020 No -Build Traffic Volumes Volurnes.dwo FA V CD NOT TO SCALE @ CD O. rnLo t99 510 4) r 31 159 171 29J r' 4)tCh 53 91 � A 31 Erhart Site Site Co// ector 000 AM Peak Hour Traffic Volume 000 PM Peak Hour TratRc Volume — Study Area Roach a Site Boundary U L () � c r/) W N m 7 V% Di � N W 1 j '� ry L 8 I �76149 /r 'jam 1 r Ao 46249 160367Y � t (� Gn 260 141 Y W 1 } r• Z 2020 Build Scenario A 2020 Build Scenario B t W a Erhart Site T a N w m m r rn� t93 331 ao ` w 1 171 29 y rn� Site Collector ` ry t 8 j 53 91 Lngp 0l -83 4 .27 Ir 1V 157� 4t } r, �! 4 t 8 4 So 76 24 52 111 Y " } r4 z w MYmkowarnDtin rer" nM55MchWat r■ Mc rerD rrwr, N199M PHOW 11524W-61so TAx Sara TOLLRM 1401-W4190 Wnt ... n n wn..eee04— I_I Erhart Medical Office Site rri PII6um 8 Dot 7/1/08 2020 Build Scenarios A & B Traffic Volumes Volumes.dwo Memorandum A-1 Development of Background Volume Estimates Tables A -I Key to Intersection Level of Service Grades A-2 Capacity Analysis Results by Movement — Powers Blvd. & Site Collector A-3 Capacity Analysis Results by Movement — Site Collector & West Site Entrance A4 Capacity Analysis Results by Movement — Site Collector & East Site Entrance Memorandum A-1 Development of Background Volume Estimates for Erhart Property Traffic Study The "Total" (Build) volumes from the "Chanhassen 2005 AUAR" Traffic Study, published in 2003 ". by Kimley-Horn were used as the basis for the No -build volumes in the Erhart property study. The following information was included within the Kimley-Horn study (which assumed no development on the Erhart property): Westwood • 2010 Build AM and PM peak hour turning movement volume estimates at the intersection of Powers Boulevard and Site Entrance • 2010 Build ADT volume estimates for the west and south legs of this intersection. In addition, the Metropolitan Council year 2030 ADT estimate for the south leg of the intersection was also noted. The missing information that must be estimated includes: • Daily (24-hour) turning movement estimates for all movements involving the west leg. These turning movement volumes will remain constant through all design years of the Erhart property traffic study since 100% build out of the Chanhassen 2005 AUAR property is anticipated by 2010. • Estimates of daily northbound and southbound through traffic for 2012, 2020, and 2030, the three design years for the Erhart property study. • 2012, 2020, and 2030 ADT estimates for the north leg. • 2012 and 2020 ADT estimates for the South leg (2030 was provided by Met Council as noted above). To develop these volume estimates, the following process was administered: 1. Daily turning movements and K-Factors (percentage of daily traffic occurring during the peak hour) were calculated (for movements to and from the west leg only) for the AM and PM peak hours using the peak hour turning movement and west leg ADT volume data provided. Separate K-Factors were calculated for the AM and PM peak hours. Complementing movements (EBL/SBR and EBR/NBL) were averaged in order to normalize the daily directional distribution at 50/50 to/from the site. 2. For the south leg, where a 2010 Total (Build) ADT estimate was provided, K-Factors for northbound and southbound through traffic were calculated using the K-Factors for site traffic developed in step 2. The same K-Factor for northbound and southbound through traffic was assumed for the AM and PM peak hours. 3. Using the K-Factor calculated for the northbound and southbound movements in step 2, along with the site traffic K-Factors from step 1, the 2010 Total (Build) ADT for the north leg was calculated. 4. The 2030 ADT for the north leg was calculated by assuming the same ratio between north and south leg for 2030 ADT as for 2010 ADT. 5. 2012 and 2020 ADT estimates for the north and south legs were estimated by linear interpolation between years 2010 and 2030. 6. Daily northbound and southbound through volume estimates for 2010 were developed using the K-factors calculated in step 3, then normalizing the results to provide a 50/50 directional distribution. 7. Daily northbound and southbound through volume estimates for 2012, 2020 and 2030 were developed by factoring the 2010 estimates by the ratios calculated in step 5. March 24, 2008 MIN CITIESIMETRO ST. CLOUD BRAINERD Table A-1 Key to Intersection Level of Service Grades Signalized Intersections LOS Control Delay Per Vehicle (in seconds) A <10 B >10 and <20 C >20 and <_35 D >35 and <_55 E >55 and <80 F >80 Unsignalized Intersections LOS Control Delay Per Vehicle (in seconds) A <10 B >10 and <_15 C >15 and <25 D >25 and <_35 E >35 and <50 F >50 Capacity Analysis Results by Movement Signalized Intersections M Table A-2 Powers Blvd. & Site Collector Volume Eastbound Site Access Westbound Site Collector Northbound Powers Blvd. Southbound Blvd. Overall Peak Scenario Lek-Thru Right Left-Thru Right Left Thru-Thru Right Left Thru-Thru Right Intersection Phase 43/D 21/C 39/D 16/B 44/D 7/A 3/A 45/D 6/A 1/A 11/B 5 0 = Phase 43/D 21/C 41/D 15/B 44/D 11/B 3/A 44/D 6/A 1/A 14/B Y W a Phase 3- 43/D 21/C 44/D 14/B 48/D 16/B 4/A 40/D 6/A 1 / A 16/B Scenario A Q Phase 3 - 44/D 21/C 44/D 15/B 44/D 10/A-B121 3/A 44/D 6/A 1/A 14/13 Scenario8 Phase 47/D 8/A 34/C 7/A 42/D 11/B 5/A 44/D 7/A 3/A 15/13 0 = Phase 50/D 8/A 45/D 7/A 42/D 14/B 5/A 45/D 7/A 3/A 17/B Y Q. Phase 3- 51/D 7/A 50/D 8/A 46/D 19/C 6/A 45/D 9/A 4/A 20/B-C12I E Scenario A a Phase 3 - 50/D 8/A 45/D 7/A 46/D 15/B 5/A 45/D 7/A 3/A 18/B Scenario Key: NN.N / X = Delay in Seconds per Vehicle / Level of Service Delay and LOS were determined by the Synchro analysis program; results are rounded to the nearest whole number (z� Delay value as rounded to the nearest whole number falls at the threshold between 2 LOS ratings Capacity Analysis Results by Movement Unsignalized Intersections (1) Table A-3 Site Collector & West Site Entrance Volume Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall Peak Scenario Left Thru Thru Right Left Right Intersection Phase 2/A 1 / A 0/A N/A N/A 2/A 2/A 0 0 = Phase 2/A 2/A 0/A N/A N/A 2/A 2/A Y A a Phase 3- 2/A 2/A 0/A 0/A 15/A-B121 3/A 2/A Scenario A Q Phase 3 - 3/A 2/A 0/A 0/A B/A 2/A 2/A Scenario B Phase 2/A 1 / A 0/A N/A N/A 3/A 2/A 0 0 = Phase 3/A 2/A 1/A N/A N/A 4/A 2/A Y A a Phase 3- 5/A 2/A 1 / A 0/A 11/B 71A 3/A :� Scenario A o- Phase 3 - 3/A 1 / A 1 / A 0/A 8/A 4IA 2/A Scenario Key: NN.N / X = Delay in Seconds per Vehicle / Level of Service "� Delay and LOS were determined by the SimTraffic analysis program: results are rounded to the nearest whole number 12� Delay value as rounded to the nearest whole number falls at the threshold between 2 LOS ratings Capacity Analysis Results by Movement Unsignalized Intersections (1) Table A-4 Site Collector & East Site Entrance Volume Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall Peak Scenario Left Thru Thru I Right Left Right Intersection Phase 2/A N/A N/A N/A 2/A 2/A 0 = Phase 2/A N/A N/A N/A 3/A 2/A Y A 0- Phase 3- 2/A 2/A O/A O/A 4/A 3/A 2/A Scenario A Q Phase 3 - 2/A 21A O/A O/A 10/A-B 121 3/A 2/A Scenario Phases 2/A N/A N/A N/A 3/A 3/A 0 0 = Phase 2/A N/A N/A N/A 4/A 3/A Y A a Phase 3- 3/A 2/A O/A O/A 9/A 51A 2/A Scenario A o Phase 3 - 2/A 1/A 0/A O/A 6/A 4IA 3/A Scenario Key: NN.N / X = Delay in Seconds per Vehicle / Level of Service "' Delay and LOS were determined by the SimTraffic analysis program; results are rounded to the nearest whole number 12' Delay value as rounded to the nearest whole number falls at the threshold between 2 LOS ratings Spack TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Memorandum To: Alyson Fauske, P.E. City of Chanhassen From: Mike Spack, P.E. Date: 10/10/2008 Re: Traffic Review of Chanhassen Fairview Medical Center Site Per your request, I have reviewed the traffic study prepared by Westwood Professional Services for the July 3, 2008 Chanhassen Fairview Medical Center Site as well as Westwood's September 4, 2008 memorandum responding to the City's concerns. The site is located on the southeast quadrant of the recently built Powers Boulevard/Trunk Highway 312 interchange. My findings related to the July 3rd traffic report are: • The traffic report is professionally done using standard traffic engineering methodology. • Since this is a recently constructed, undeveloped area of Chanhassen it is appropriate to use data from the Chanhassen 2005 AUAR as the basis for the "no -build" conditions. • The forecasts in the traffic study are largely reasonable, however the traffic volume forecasts for the 2020 Build Scenario A (in Figure 8) seem to distribute the traffic from Phase 3 of the development 70% towards Powers Boulevard and 30% towards Highway 101. This proportion is backwards from the pattern shown in Figure 4. This results in more traffic using the Powers Boulevard/Site Collector intersection than is likely to happen. The analysis shows this intersection will operate acceptably at Level of Service C or better even with these higher traffic volumes as long as the intersection is traffic signal controlled. The analysis was done more conservatively than necessary. • It should be noted the Level of Service results reported for intersections use the criteria from the Highway Capacity Manual, but do not use the Level of Service algorithms from the Highway Capacity Manual. Instead, Westwood chose to use SimTraffic micro -simulations to develop the delay and queue measurements reported in the study. This is appropriate because the micro - simulations provide more realistic metrics at stop sign controlled intersections in heavy traffic conditions. • The traffic report does not have a Conclusions/Recommendations section, although in reference to the Powers Boulevard/Site Collector intersection it is stated on page 14 "a traffic signal will be required when traffic volumes reach Fairview Chanhassen Medical Center 2 of 3 Alyson Fauske, City of Chanhassen Traffic Review Phase 2 levels in order to safely accommodate left turners exiting the site." This is an appropriate conclusion based on the analysis in the report. The traffic report does not draw conclusions about the site's two driveways, although the analysis shows the proposed lane configuration (no turn lanes) and the driveway stop sign control (Site Collector Roadway is free flowing) will be adequate. The analysis modeled a small bypass lane at the westerly driveway's eastbound approach due to the planned shoulder. I performed a sensitivity analysis assuming the shoulder does not operate as a bypass lane (using the 2020 Build Scenario A traffic volumes as a worst case). The intersection will still operate acceptably if motorists choose not to use the shoulder to bypass a vehicle waiting to turn left into the site. My findings related to the September 4ei response memo from Westwood: • Comment 1 — I agree with Westwood's response. • Comment 2 — o The warrant analysis was conducted by distributing the daily traffic volume forecasts per the traffic patterns at Mn/DOT ATR 458. This automated traffic recorder is located on Chestnut Street in Chaska. It should be noted this is a significant assumption in the analysis, however it is reasonable given we don't have mature traffic patterns along Powers Boulevard. o The warrant analysis excluded the right turn volume, which is appropriate per Chapter 4C.1 of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD). However, the analysis inappropriately assumes 2+ approach lanes on the Site Collector Roadway when it should have been conducted for one approach lane on the Site Collector Roadway (per MnMUTCD Chapter 4C.1 — "right - turn traffic should not be included in the minor -street volume if the movement enters the major street with minimal conflict. The approach should be evaluated as a one -lane approach with only the traffic volume in the through/left-turn lane considered.") Westwood did not provide the traffic volumes that were used in the warrant analysis so I cannot analyze the impact of changing the minor street approach from two lanes to one lane. o Westwood claims the signal is needed for the development on the west side of Powers Boulevard. The Chanhassen 2005 AUAR found the intersection would work acceptably with side street stop sign control (stop sign on the Site Collector Roadway with Powers Boulevard remaining free flowing) if the intersection was only a tee intersection. The Levels of Service degrade unacceptably at the intersection with the addition of the intersection's fourth leg to serve the medical/office building. o Access Spacing — I agree with Westwood's assessment that a traffic signal at the Powers Boulevard/Site Collector would operate acceptably even though it doesn't meet the County's'/4 mile spacing. A traffic signal is appropriate at the intersection, when warranted, given the characteristics of the Powers Boulevard corridor and area topography. Fairview Chanhassen Medical Center 3 of 3 Alyson Fauske, City of Chanhassen Traffic Review Comment 3 — I agree with Westwood's response. Comment 4 — I agree with Westwood's response. Conclusions and Recommendations The Site Collector Roadway as well as the site's two driveway intersections onto the Site Collector Roadway will operate acceptably as proposed. The Powers Boulevard/Site Collector Roadway intersection should be controlled with a traffic signal in the future when the intersection meets warrants for installation. It is clear the intersection will not need the traffic signal until the intersection is operating as a four legged intersection and at least Phase 1 of the Fairview Medical Center is built. The need for a dual southbound to eastbound left turn lane has been raised by Mn/DOT and Carver County, although the traffic analysis does not indicate it would be necessary. If the dual left turn lane is required by the County, a traffic signal would need to be installed to control the intersection. Dual left turn lanes do not operate safely without traffic signal control at the intersection. It is recommended a traffic signal warrant analysis be completed for the Powers Boulevard/Site Collector Roadway intersection before Phase 2 of the Fairview Medical Center is built. This warrant analysis should forecast the traffic conditions of Phase 2 using the then existing traffic patterns at the intersection (instead of the pattern based on ATR 458). It should also use one lane of approach on the minor approach instead of two. Please contact me at 952-378-5017 if you would like to discuss any of my findings. Thank you for the opportunity to review the Fairview Chanhassen Medical Center development plan for the City. CARVER � wa/rER NSERVATIOM DISTRKT ,4i1%9 Cnr` 219 East Frontage Road Waconia, MN 55387 1946 ' co' Phone: 952-442-5 101 cotenty sxcp Fax:952-442-5497 hnv://www.co.mr er.nm.us/SWCD/SWCD mnin.html Mission Statement: To provide leadership in conservation and teach stewardship of the soil, water, and related resources through a balanced, cooperative program that prolects, restores, and improves those resources. October 10, 2008 Robert Generous, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Fairview Chanhassen Medical Center 08-16 Mr. Generous, The SWCD has received the plans for the proposed above mentioned project. The following items are required for our office to review for storm water compliance. A NPDES Permit is required for this project A Storm Water Pollution Preventive Plan must be developed and approved by the City and its consulting partners prior to approval of the plans. The SWPPP must include, but not limited the following items - The General Contractor with overall day to day responsibility of the project must be the contractor must be the contractor for the NPDES permit. - An individual assigned by the General Contractor must be qualified to complete weekly storm water inspection reports. A box will need to be placed on site for these specific documents. - Sequencing of the project is needed with the storm -water pond being built in conjunction with mass grading of the site to allow for storm water storage on site — temporary basin detail measures are needed. This is an enforceable measure that needs to be completed. - Dewatering is an issue on most projects, due to the nature of our clay soils — a plan should be developed specifically for this project so the contractor is aware of this issue. - All areas of silt fences that are continuous for a greater length of 300 feet will need to turned up at each end and a new rum will need to be placed. Also, silt fence that will not be placed on the contour must have J-Hooks installed every 75 feet to break up concentrated flows created by the silt fence. These areas should be shown on the grading plan for the contractor to identify these areas for installation purposes. AN EQUAL onoatr NM uQwrea - Diversions should be shown on the grading plan to show the contractor that they will need to be installed to allow storm water to be directed to the temporary storm water pond during initial phasing of the project. - The concrete washout area must be self contained watertight and handled by state guidelines. The block layers with their mobile Spec. Mixer will need to have secondary containment around the mixers. -Chanhassen City ordinance should be consulted regarding the silt fence protecting an existing wetland — higher standards are required. Please include our office in any Pre -Construction meetings your department may have prior to start of the project. Sincerely, Chip Hentges CPESC Conservation Technician Wgovuy ( 8) I -INS Carver County Pubf c Works 11360Hpiu. 212 West suite Cologns MN 55iV AM6 Phone (952) 466-3= FxC(932) 466-5273 August 14, 2008 Robert Generous Chanhassen Senior Planner 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Fairview Chanhassen Medical Center Planning Case — 08-16 PID 25-1550020 Carver County Road 17 (Powers Blvd) Dear Mr. Generous: Administration Parrs Engtneenng HRhulay Maintenance Equipment `Maintenance surrMying &Map" RECEIVED AUG 18 2008 CITY OF CHANHASSFN Carver County Public Works has reviewed the information regarding the above listed proposal transmitted to our office by your memo dated July 7, 2008 and the included CD. At this time Carver County has the following comments on this proposal. These comments are not meant to be all-inclusive. Additional comments may be needed as this project develops and approaches approval. This portion of County Road 17 (Powers Boulevard) between County 14 (Pioneer Trail) and County Road 18 (Lyman Blvd) was designed as part of the interchange design for the TH 212 Design/Build project. When CR 17 was being designed in this location, there was concern about having an access to CR 17 located at what is now the constructed access location. When reviewing the access location and existence at that time, Carver County believes the proposed development that would be using this access was of a much lower density and would generate a lot less traffic than is being proposed in this most recent development proposal. The County needs additional information and time to review the impacts this new proposal will have on County Road 17. The city working with MnDOT in providing information about the previously proposed development, the roadway system layout, and resulting traffic numbers that were incorporated into the design of New 212 would be appreciated. • A review of the transportation study included with this proposal indicates a traffic signal will eventually be needed on County Road 17 at this intersection to accommodate the traffic generated by this development. It is understood the traffic signal evaluation submitted was based on the AUAR traffic forecast numbers generated in 2005. It is requested that the developer also relate the traffic signal evaluation to the traffic modeling completed as part of the 2030 County Roadway System Plan. • Carver County does not have a traffic signal installation at this intersection included in our capital improvement program or budget. The city is asked to consider requiring the developer to be financially responsible for the installation of a traffic signal and the modification of the intersection as needed. Al ati Adqual OPportundy Empkt e Printed on RKc Ieq Paper Contains Mmrmum 10% Post Consumer Waste SCANNED Robert Generous August 14, 2008 Fairview Chanhassen Medical Center From our review, it appears Phase 2 of this development will require encroachment onto existing Mn/DOT right of way located along County Road 17. With this proposed higher density development, the County may require a greater than indicated final right-of-way width on County Road 17 to accommodate the increased impacts to this intersection area. Also, greater than dedicated final right-of-way width may be required to accommodate sight lines, placement of highway signage, installation of traffic control units, installation of street lighting, and other highway related appurtenances. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal. We look forward to working with the City in advancing this development in a manner that sustains the safety, mobility and corridor characteristics of CR 17. If there are further questions regarding this letter, please call me at 952466-5200. Sincere' oger M. Gustafson, P County Engineer s/R&B/General Road Maintenance/CSAH/17/Chan Letter -Fairview Proposal 08-14-08 Amrmalwe AUo Qual Opp ,tu ty Employer PomW on Rm,yL Paper Conlams Mlmmum 10%Post Consumer waste SCANNED t #\NNE�9 Minnesota Department of Transportation < Metropolitan District ,so a° G (0 �� Waters Edge M'oFraP�e 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113-3174 August 14, 2008 RECEI LlE�% Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner AUG City of Chanhassen 1 5 2008 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CHANNA PO Box 147 Sga r, Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Fairview Medical Center (Chanhassen) Mn/DOT Review # P08-039 Southeast Quadrant of TH 312 and Powers Boulevard City of Chanhassan/Carver County Control Section 1017 Dear Ms. Al-Jaff: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced plat in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subdivision 2, Plats. Before any further development, please address the following comments: Area Engineer: If the "Access Road" for Fairview extends and connects east to TH 101, there is a concern that this will increase traffic levels at the Powers Blvd intersection. The traffic study shows just enough storage for the southbound left turn lane at Powers Blvd and the Access Road, with little or no extra capacity for additional vehicles. Any additional traffic for that movement could impact operations at the TH 312 ramp. For questions regarding these comments, please contact Nicole Peterson, Mn/DOT Traffic Section, at (651) 234-7723. Right -Of -Way Reconveyance: At present, Mn/DOT is in receipt of a request from the previous property owner to reconvey the area highlighted for reconveyance in the development plan. It is very important to note that this portion of TH 312 is still under construction, and nothing will be conveyed until the contractor has completed all work in the area and released it back to the State. It is therefore advised that the developer should not design their plans using any of the current Mn/DOT right-of-way until such time that the land is deeded to them. For questions concerning these comments, please contact Keith McMurray, Mn/DOT Right -Of -Way Section, at (651) 234- 7581. Water Resources: This development will affect existing drainage at the TH 312/Powers Blvd interchange so a drainage permit will be required. It is difficult to determine how the Stormwater Report, Preliminary Plans and Wetland Layout correspond because ponding, wetland and drainage areas do not match between the plans and the models. When the drainage permit is applied for there will need to be further clarification on what is actually happening with stormwater and ponding on -site. An equal opportunity employer SCANNO The following information is required with the drainage permit application: - Final drainage plan showing storm sewer plan, storm sewer profiles and pond contours. - Existing and proposed drainage area maps with flow arrows. - Existing and proposed drainage/pond computations for the 2, 10, and 100 year rainfall events. Additional information may be required once a drainage permit is submitted and after a detailed review. Please direct questions concerning drainage issues to Derek Beauduy, Mn/DOT Water Resources Section, at (651) 234-7522. Permits: As noted previous, a drainage permit will be required. Further, any work impacting MnDOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/teegM/utility. Please include one full-size plan set, and an 1 I x 17 inch plan set for each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig, MnDOT's Metro Permits Section, at (651) 234-7911. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require either: 1. One (1) electronic pdf version of the plans (the electronic version of the plan needs to be developed for I I" x 17" printable format with sufficient detail so that all features are legible); 2. Seven (7) sets of full size plans. If submitting the plans electronically, please use the pdf. format. Mn/DOT can accept the plans via e-mail at metrodeweviews@dot.state.mn.us provided that each separate e-mail is less than 20 megabytes. Otherwise, the plans can be submitted on a compact disk. If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at (651)234-7797. Sincerely, Wi liam Senior Planner Copy: Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer, Cologne, MN Bill Katter, United Properties LLC., Minneapolis, MN Blind Copy sent via Groupwise: Nicole Peterson Tod Sherman E.Buck Craig Derek Beauduy Keith McMurray Sheila Kauppi Ann Braden / Metropolitan Council File Copy: Mn/DOT Division File CS 1017 Mn/DOT LGL File City of Chanhassen, MN Roger Gustafson Carver County Engineer 11360 Highway 212 West Suite 1 Cologne, MN 55322 Bill Katter United Properties LLC. 3500 American Boulevard West Minneapolis, MN 55431 mO#,NNEgp�IZ Minnesota Department of Transportation �� a Metropolitan District F P� Waters Edge �OF T{iP�g 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113-3174 October 27, 2008 Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner CITY OF CHANHASSEN City of Chanhassen RECEIVED 7700 Market Boulevard O C T 2 8 2008 PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 - CHANHASSEN PLANNING [) Pp SUBJECT: Fairview Medical Center (Chanhassen) Mn/DOT Review # P08-039A Southeast Quadrant of TH 312 and Powers Boulevard City of Chanhassan/Carver County Control Section 1017 Dear Ms. Al -Jaffa The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced revised plat in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subdivision 2, Plats. Before any further development, please address the following comments: Right -Of -Way Reconveyance. At present, Mn/DOT is in receipt of a request from the previous property owner to reconvey the area highlighted for reconveyance in the development plan. Mn/DOT has yet to make a determination as to what land may be able to be reconveyed. Specifically, there are still issues yet to be resolved along the south line of the eastbound entrance ramp. It is very important to note that this portion of TH 312 is still under construction, and nothing will be conveyed until the contractor has completed all work in the area and released it back to the State. Until all issues are resolved, the developer can not plan on use of the site, as proposed. It is therefore advised that the developer should not design their plans using any of the current Mn/DOT right-of-way until such time that the land is deeded to them. For questions concerning these comments, please contact Keith McMurray, Mn/DOT Right -Of -Way Section, at (651) 234-7581. Design: The following are the comments and questions of Mn/DOT Design Section: Powers Blvd Access: Please provide a construction/grading plan for the "Phase 1" development showing grades of the roadways and side slopes at the junction of the Access Road and Power Blvd. Also identify any structures that will be affected within Mn/DOT right-of-way. Trail: It is noted that significant grading and drainage needs to occur with the proposed trail next to the eastbound TH 312 ramp, therefore, Mn/DOT will not allow construction of this segment of trail upon Mn/DOT right-of-way until the reconveyance process is complete. At such time, the trail will have to meet minimum design Mn/DOT requirements for public trails upon Mn/DOT right-of-way. Additionally, verification will be needed as to whether the proposed An equal opportunity employer aCAnNtD trail will affect the culvert located at the conjunction of the existing and proposed trail. If, following the reconveyance determination, the trail encroaches upon Mn/DOT right-of-way, a Limited Use Permit will be required. Ste: The project identification sign cannot be constructed on MnDOT right-of-way, and therefore, must be relocated. Landscaninr: The trees that are proposed to be planted on Mn/DOT right-of-way in the "Phase I" plan will need to be reviewed and approved by Mn/DOT Technical Support. Please provide the requested information to Nancy Jacobson, Mn/DOT Design Section, at (651) 234-7647. Rater Resources: A drainage permit will be required. There shall be no increase in discharge is permitted to Mn/DOT right of way. Please show the north area of proposed "Phase 2" more clearly to verify contours and drainage of north parking area. Additionally, please submit computations to the north ditch alterations. When the drainage permit is applied for there will need to be further clarification on what is actually happening with stormwater and ponding on -site. The following information is required with the drainage permit application: - Final drainage plan showing storm sewer plan, storm sewer profiles and pond contours. - Existing and proposed drainage area maps with flow arrows. - Existing and proposed drainage/pond computations for the 2, 10, and 100 year rainfall events. Additional information may be required once a drainage permit is submitted and after a detailed review. Please direct questions concerning drainage issues to Martin Kors, Mn/DOT Water Resources Section, at (651) 234-753 7. Permits: As noted previous, a drainage permit will be required. Additionally, a limited use and short form permits will he required for the proposed trail. Lastly, any work impacting MnDOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsgp/utility. Please include one full-size plan set, and an 11 x 17 inch plan set for each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig, MnDOT's Metro Permits Section, at (651) 234-7911. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Reviews Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 SCANNED Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require either: 1. One (1) electronic pdf. version of the plans (the electronic version of the plan needs to be developed for I I" x'17" printable format with sufficient detail so that all features are legible); 2. Seven (7) sets of full size plans. If submitting the plans electronically, please use the pdf. format. Mn/DOT can accept the plans via e-mail at metrodevreviewsng,dot.state.mn.us provided that each separate e-mail is less than 20 megabytes. Otherwise, the plans can be submitted on a compact disk. If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at (651)234-7797. Sincerely, tam ff Senior Planner Copy: Roger Gustafson, Carver County Engineer, Cologne, MN Bill Katter, United Properties LLC., Minneapolis, MN Blind Copy sent via Groupwise: Nicole Peterson Tod Sherman E.Buck Craig Martin Kors Keith McMurray Sheila Kauppi Ann Braden / Metropolitan Council File Copy: Mn/DOT Division File CS 1017 Mn/DOT LGL File City of Chanhassen, MN Roger Gustafson Carver County Engineer 11360 Highway 212 West Suite 1 Cologne, MN 55322 Bill Katter United Properties LLC. 3500 American Boulevard West Minneapolis, MN 55431 SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on April 23, 2009, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Powers Crossing Professional Center to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me thisA411-day of 14pri 1 , 2009. Notaryis K en J. En 1 ardt, Dep Clerk g KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public -Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2010 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; Subdivision into one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-of-way; Rezoning from Agricultural Proposal: Estate (A2) to Office/Institutional (OI), Site Plan Review with Variances for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot medical center, up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp and signage — POWERS CROSSING PROFESSIONAL CENTER Applicant: United Properties, LLC/Timothy & Dawne Erhart Property Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Location: (southeast corner of Powers Boulevard and Highway 312) A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public What Happens hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/09-06.html. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Generous by Questions & email at bcenerousiDuchanhassen.mmus or by phone at 952-227- Comments: 1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included In the report, lease contact the Planning Stall person named on the notification. Date & Time: Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening,depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; Subdivision into one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-of-way; Rezoning from Agricultural Proposal: Estate (A2) to Office/Institutional (OI), Site Plan Review with Variances for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot medical center, up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp and signage— POWERS CROSSING PROFESSIONAL CENTER Applicant: United Properties, LLC/Timothy & Dawne Erhart Property Outlot A, Butternut Ridge (southeast comer of Powers Boulevard and Highway 312) Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public What Happens hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/09-06.htmi. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Generous by Questions & email at bceneroustilici.chanhassen.mir ms or by phone at 952.227- Comments: 1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Stall person named on the notification. ANDREW T RIEGERT BEVERLY C ERICKSON BRADLEY C WORM 620 96TH ST W 520 PINEVIEW CT 750 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8601 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8697 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 BRIAN J & MICHELLE R O'DONNELL 1151 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8613 DANIEL D & KATHERINE HORSFALL 9610 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8688 DAVID R & MARY B BLANSKI 9350 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8642 CHARLES E & SANDRA R WORM 760 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 DAVID D & STEPHANIE J VIEAU 901 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8609 DAVID S & CYNTHIA L DEVOY 600 94TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317.8600 G&M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP GARY J & MARY LANE BENDZICK 24760 CEDAR POINT RD 731 96TH ST W NEW PRAGUE, MN 56071-4056 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 GREGORY M FALCONER 720 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 JAMES H & TERESA O GIUSTI 540 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8697 JAMES R & SHARON M HEDBERG 750 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8671 JOHNNIE J & ELAINE A MEYERING 1050 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8634 JAMES & ARLENE J CHURCH 611 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8602 JAMES L & JANET P BROWNELL 1190 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8612 JOHN C & JACKIE J DANIELS 1111 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8613 JOYCE E KING 9391 KIOWA TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8617 DAMON D & LISA L KANZLER 1161 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8613 DAVID L & ROSELEE W WONDRA 9590 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8681 EICKHOLT TRUST 3825 CHOWEN AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55410-1044 GAYLE O & LOIS J DEGLER 541 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8697 JAMES D WILSON ETAL 5730 YANCY AVE NEW GERMANY. MN 55367-9327 JAMES M & TERESA A BYRNE 700 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 JOHN E & CYNTHIA N HART 951 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8609 KAREN KAY HENRICKSON 9651 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8605 KEVIN J & PATRICIA A ELLSWORTH KEVIN L & LORI A BOGENREIF KURT W PAPKE & 9601 FLINTLOCK TRL 631 96TH ST W 1131 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8605 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8602 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8613 LESLIE L O'HALLORAN LORI L LARSON MAGDY A & JUNE L EBRAHIM 710 96TH ST W 1051 HOMESTEAD LN 521 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8611 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8697 PAMELA A O'NEILL 9550 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8681 PAUL T ANDERSON & 9380 KIOWA TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8616 PRINCE R NELSON 7801 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8201 ROBERT & CHRISTIN E BOECKER 610 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8601 ROGER A & KIMBERLY A LEE 600 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8601 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION ST PAUL, MN 55155-1801 STEVEN J & SANDRA R KADISAK 810 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8673 THOMAS M & CHERYL L JESSEN 9570 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8681 PAUL D & CAROL L PAULSON 9250 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8641 PETER A & JERILYN M SCHWALEN 1001 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8611 PRINCE R NELSON 7801 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8201 ROBERT A & ELIZABETH K HAAK 770 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8671 ROGER G NOVOTNY 560 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8697 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION ST PAUL, MN 55155-1801 THEODORE B & KAREN K HASSE 630 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8601 TIMOTHY A & DAWNE M ERHART 9611 MEADOWLARK LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8695 PAUL J & CHERYL LOKKESMOE 9650 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8688 PETER A DIRKS 900 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8608 ROBERT & BETTY WOLD 731 PIONEER TRL CHASKA, MN 55318-1157 ROBERT F ERLER & 9600 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8605 RONALD L & KOLLEEN M BROWN 9650 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8605 STEPHEN J & COLEEN M W ILKER 621 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8602 THOMAS J & SHARON L MESCHKE 9701 FLINTLOCK TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8637 TIMOTHY A & DAWNE M ERHART 9611 MEADOWLARK LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8695 TIMOTHY J LOWE WADE W MARSHALL WAYNE O & GAYLE D WENZLAFF 601 96TH ST W 9441 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 1181 HOMESTEAD LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8602 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8607 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8613 WENCES M HORAK ETAL WESLEY & CAROL DUNSMORE WILLIAM F & MARY E HEINLEIN 9700 FLINTLOCK TRL 730 96TH ST W 721 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8637 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8603 PROPOSED MOTIONS: A. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional District, OI." B. "Me Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit with Variances to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; subject to conditions 1 through 10 on page 35-36." C. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the Subdivision (Preliminary Plat) creating one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-of- way, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to conditions 1 through 45 on pages 36-40." D. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the Site Plan with Variances for building height and Bluff Creek Primary Zone setbacks for Planning Case #09-06, for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office center, and up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp on Lot 1, Block 1 of the development, plans prepared by Pope Associates, Inc. and Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to conditions 1 through 28 on pages 40-42." And, E. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve a sign size Variance request to permit an eight (8) foot tall sign with up to 64 square feet of sign display area, subject to conditions 1 through 5 on page 42." The Planning Commission also adopts the attached findings of fact and recommendations. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: POWERS CROSSING PROFESSIONAL CENTER The developer is requesting the following: • Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; • Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional, OI; • Subdivision into one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-of-way; • Site Plan with Variances for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office center, and a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp; and 0 Signage Variance. Location Map (Subject Property Highlighted in Yellow) Powers Crossing Professional Center Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition Planning Case 2009-06 Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 2 of 43 LOCATION: Outiot A, Butternut Ridge Addition (southeast comer of Powers Boulevard/CSAH 17 and Highway 212) APPLICANT: United Properties, LLC Timothy & Dawne Erhart 3500 American Boulevard West 9611 Meadowlark Lane Minneapolis, MN 55431 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)837-8525 Attn: William Katter william.katter@uproperties.com PRESENT ZONING: Agricultural Estate District, A2 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Office and Residential — Low Density (net density 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 116.88 acres DENSITY: F.A.R. 0.36 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 3 of 43 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is proposing to build a three-story professional office center southeast of the intersection of Minnesota Trunk Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. The facility is intended to be constructed in two phases with a total of 160,000 finished square feet. At build out, up to a five -story parking ramp would be constructed on the site. The full build out is contingent upon a turnback to the land owner of MnDOT right-of-way. In the event that this tumback does not occur, the applicant has requested to be allowed to add a fourth -story to the first phase building for a total of 112,000 square feet. The applicant intends to get all their preliminary approvals in place so that they can begin construction when the market can support the development. The site is located within the Bluff Creek Overlay District (District). This district was created in 1998 based upon the findings and recommendations of the 1996 Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources and Management Plan. The district was intended to have several functions. The primary function of the district is to protect the geomorphology and hydrology of Bluff Creek, a 303d listed impaired water, and to preserve the natural corridor from the Minnesota River Valley to Lake Mmnewashta Regional Park for aesthetic, recreational, surface water and wildlife benefits. In reviewing the proposed project, there are two major issues that need to be addressed: The background, vision and rules governing and the impact of the proposed development on the Bluff Creek corridor, including the location of the building, the encroachment into the primary zone, and any necessary or appropriate mitigation, which will be reviewed in the conditional use permit discussion. The impacts of the development on infrastructure, especially traffic, which is reviewed as part of the subdivision and site plan. The applicant is requesting a subdivision of the property and a site plan review to permit the development of a professional office on the westerly portion of the property, and to provide access and utilities for the future development of the eastern portion of the property. The property surrounding this site is zoned Agricultural Estate District, A2, and is located in the next area of urban services expansion for the City. To the north is the eastbound ramp to Highway 212, a passive park area purchased by the City in 1998, the southern portions of the Wilson nursery property, and two single- family homes on larger lots. To the east is Highway 101, across which is Bandimere Community Park and single-family homes. To the south are single-family homes on large lots, which are zoned Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 4 of 43 Rural Residential, RR. West across Powers Boulevard is a cultivated farm field and wetlands that is guided for Office use. Water service was provided to the site in conjunction with the Highway 212 project. The water extension was expedited to avoid the necessity of having to retrofit a water line under the new highway and along Powers Boulevard. Sewer service is being provided in conjunction with City Project #08-09, which is anticipated for approval in 2009. This sewer project includes a lift station located south of the local street connection to Powers Boulevard which will serve all the land in the City south of Highway 212 currently not connected to City sewer, and a force main from the lift station to Lyman Boulevard. The portion of the site proposed for development is limited to the extreme western quarter of the property. Portions of this area are part of the Bluff Creek corridor primary zone. A created wetland and proposed wetland mitigation area are located in the eastern portion of the development area A ridge line, with a high elevation of approximately 924, divides the western development area from the eastern development area. A wooded area runs from the northeast to the southwest across this portion of the site. The site generally slopes from the north and east to the southwest with a low elevation of 868. An existing stomrwater pond is located in the west central portion of the site. This pond is proposed to be relocated to the south of the new public street. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed development with modifications and subject to the conditions contained within the staff report. APPLICABLE REGUATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article IV, Division 2, Conditional Use Permits Chapter 20, Article VI, Wetland Protection Chapter 20, Article XXI, , OP' Office and Institutional District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and Office - Institutional Developments Chapter 20, Article XXIV, Off -Street Parking and Loading Chapter 20, Article XXV, Landscaping and Tree Removal Chapter 20, Article XXVI, Signs Chapter 20, Article XXXI, Bluff Creek Overlay District Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 5 of 43 BACKGROUND As part of the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the City approved a Land Use amendment of the westerly 10 acres of the property from Residential -Low Density to Office. This site also represents a significant gateway into our community. As such, it is anticipated that the development be a higher caliber and grander scale than other development in the OI district. This area is separated by both topography and vegetation from the remainder of the parcel to the east. It is anticipated that the remainder of the site will develop with a mix of housing types that maintain the 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre net density. On October 23, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved Wetland Alteration Permit #06-32 for the construction of an access road and stormwater pond. The wetland mitigation for this is located just east of the proposed Lot 1 and north of the large wetland complex. in 2006, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) constructed an extension of Powers Boulevard from Lyman Boulevard to Pioneer Trail in conjunction with the Truk Highway 212 project. Future development within the City requires a lift station south of TH 212 and north of Pioneer Trail along Powers Boulevard. In addition, the TH 212 project needed to provide access to properties south of TH 212, west and east of the Powers Boulevard extension. Due to Carver County's requirements for separation of access points onto a county road, the curb cut to access the Erhart property was located adjacent to an existing wetland. The applicant proposed the construction of a 31-foot wide street to provide access to the western portion of the property, in addition to the future City lift station. In conjunction with the access point and lift station location, the property owner requested and received a wetland alteration permit (Planning Case #06-32) in 2006. The wetland mitigation required of the permit has not been completed. On July 10, 1995, the City Council approved the preliminary and final plat of Butternut Ridge Addition, Subdivision #95-9, creating one lot and one outlot. This subdivision permitted the property owner to sell the 2'/z-acre home site on the property and keep the balance of the site for the owner's personal use and future development. The property owner still owns the home on the property. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 6 of 43 REZONING While the development had originally been contemplated as a planned unit development (PUD), staff felt that Office & Institutional (OI) zoning with a variance request was more appropriate for the site since only one lot was being developed. The OI district is a limited use district that permits health services/hospitals, offices and cultural type uses. These uses will be compatible with the existing and future residential development to the east and south and the future office use to the west across Powers Boulevard. The proposed zoning classification is consistent with the office land use designation of the northwesterly ten acres of the property, which approved as part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan update. Initially, the City had been considering amending only the westerly three acres to Office use. These three acres included the more open area of the site at the base of the slope separating the western portion of the property from the eastern portion. However as part of the Comprehensive Plan update process, a total of ten acres was included in the land use amendment to facilitate the development of the site as a gateway to the community. The balance of the property remains guided residential —low density and will maintain its Agricultural Estate District (A2) zoning until it is proposed for development. ARTICLE XXI. "OI" OFFICE AND INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT Sec. 20-791. Intent. The intent of the "OP' District is to provide for public or quasi -public nonprofit uses and professional business and administrative offices. Sec. 20-792. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in an "OP' District: (1) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (2) Community center. (3) Churches. (4) Fire station. (5) Funeral homes. (6) Health services/hospitals. (7) Library. (8) Museum. (9) Nursing homes. (10)Offices. (I I)Post office. (12)Public parks/open space. (I3)Public recreational facilities. (14)Schools. (15)Utility services. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 7 of 43 Sec. 20-793. Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in the "OP' District: (1) Parking lots. (2) Signs. (3) Temporary outdoor sales (subject to the requirements of section 20-312). Sec. 20-794. Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in the "OP' District: (1) Adaptive reuse of vacant public or private school buildings for private business uses. (2) Commercial towers as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. Sec. 20-795. Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an "OP' District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter: (1) The minimum lot area is 15,000 square feet. (2) The minimum lot frontage is 75 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac shall have a minimum lot frontage of 60 feet. (3) The minimum lot depth is 150 feet. (4) The maximum lot coverage is 65 percent. (5) Off-street parking shall comply with district setback requirements except: a. There is no minimum setback when it abuts a railroad right-of-way, except as provided in chapter 20, article XXV, division 3 pertaining to landscaping requirements. b. There is no minimum setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off-street parking area. c. The minimum setback is 50 feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. d. The minimum setback is 25 feet for side street side yards. (6) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, two stories. b. For accessory structures, one story. (7) Minimum setback requirements: a. For front yards, 35 feet. b. For rear yards, 30 feet. c. For side yards, 15 feet. d. The minimum setback is 50 feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. Sec. 20-796. Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "OI" District: Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 8 of 43 (1) Temporary classroom structures for use by public or private schools needed for temporary use. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT Blurt Cre k v lay Dmtr ict Development within the Bluff Creek corridor requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit. As part of this specific development request, the applicant is requesting a variance from the primary zone boundary to encroach into the primary zone for the development of the project, including buildings, grading, parking and driveway, stormwater ponding and the proposed wetland mitigation area. The Bluff Creek Primary Zone encompasses approximately the westerly 20 percent of the property. Bluff Creek is entirely within the City of Chanhassen. It provides a unique blend of habitat, vegetation and recreational opportunities through the center of the City. The corridor encompasses all of the land which drains to Bluff Creek. In December 1996, the City of Chanhassen adopted the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan (BCWNRMP). The plan was the culmination of several years of study and planning focused on protecting the natural and recreational resources provided by the Bluff Creek corridor. The BCWNRMP recommended the establishment of a primary zone (the creek, riparian wetlands, associated steep slopes, native vegetation) and a secondary zone (other undeveloped portions of the watershed) as a tool to help protect the creek's natural resources. The primary and secondary Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 9 of 43 zones were mapped at that time using aerial photography to provide staff and the public with a general idea of where the zones would lie. The City of Chanhassen established the Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOD) by ordinance in 1998. The BCOD was modified on this property to remove that portion impacted by grading north of the pond and that portion impacted by the construction of TH 212. Even with this modification of the BCOD, a significant portion of the property remains encumbered by the BCOD. The primary zone includes the forested area of the site and the wetlands contained therein, which included the wetland that was filled as part of the approved wetland alteration permit in 2006. If granted, this will be the first variance of this type within the Bluff Creek Overlay District in this area. Decisions made regarding this development may set a precedent for future developments. The Bluff Creek Overlay District was intended to preserve the natural corridor along Bluff Creek for aesthetic, recreational, wildlife and water quality functions. As Section 20-1551 of the City Code states, "significant natural features should impact development rather than development impacting significant natural features." Bluff Creek is a 303d-listed water with turbidity and fish IBI impairments. It is known to have significant erosion and sediment issues resulting from the increase in surface water discharge volumes to the creek. Currently, the City and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency are conducting a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Study. This study will result in further Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 10 of 43 recommendations to protect Bluff Creek. The Bluff Creek Overlay District was intended, in part, to guide development to minimize the increases in hardscape that accompany development by creatively designing site plans to reduce impervious surface and save significant natural resources. Because of the need to define the underlying causes of the erosion within Bluff Creek, the Bluff Creek Corridor Feasibility Study was undertaken. This study identified 22 severely eroded gullies and escarpments just in the lower valley alone downstream of the proposed development. Figure 3. Bluff Creek erosion issues downstream of proposed development Properties within the Bluff Creek Overlay District are subject to the following requirements: 1. A conditional use permit is required prior to all subdivisions, site plans, land alteration and building within the BCOD. 2. Bluffs must be preserved as set forth in Article XXVIII of City Code. 3. Density transfers can be used to cluster development in areas where the location of the primary zone makes portions of the site unsuitable for development. 4. Natural habitat areas within the primary zone must be preserved as open space. 5. The primary zone must be 100 percent open space. 6. All structures must be set back at least 40 feet from the primary zone. 7. The first 20 feet of the setback from the primary zone cannot be disturbed. The area has experienced extensive land alteration in the last two years with the construction of TH 212, the extension of Powers Boulevard and the placement of the access road onto the site. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 11 of 43 The corridor, which was contiguous in 2006, has experience significant fragmentation, tree loss and wetland loss. 'so f �3. �• Fu. 2006 Existing Conditions 2008 Existing Conditions Figure 4. Land use changes from 2006 to 2008 All of these land use changes lead to increased runoff to Bluff Creek and further degradation of the creek. In addition, as loss of wetland and woodland diminishes the wildlife and aesthetic value of the area, the function and value of the Bluff Creek corridor as a natural area is reduced. Natural Habitat Preservation Section 20-1561. Natural Habitat Preservation. (a) Natural habitat areas within the primary zone shall be preserved as permanent open space. Any development that occurs shall be directly related to the development of a continuous greenway along the creek from the Minnesota River to Lake Minnewashta as outlined in the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan. (b) Where possible, any disturbances of natural habitat areas within the secondary zone shall be avoided. Any alterations to the natural habitat within the secondary zone shall adhere to the practices delineated in the city's surface water management plan. Land use changes on the property have already resulted in the loss of one Manage 1 wetland and a significant area of woodland. The proposed development plan will remove nearly three additional acres of trees. Further, the limits of tree removal and the placement of the road will completely sever the southwestern portion of the site, as well as Bluff Creek and the adjoining wetland from the remainder of the property. Wetlands Wetland A, as shown in Figure 4 above, was filled to create an access road to the site. This wetland was part of a drainage system that flowed from northeast to southwest across the site Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 12 of 43 into the filled wetland before discharging into the riparian wetland adjacent to Bluff Creek. Two other wetlands exist on or immediately adjacent to the project site. The first is located near the top of Figure 4 and was intended to be restored and expanded to mitigate for the loss of Wetland A. To date, this mitigation has not been performed. The original applicant has given a letter of credit to the City of Chanhassen and has until June 1, 2009 to complete the restoration or be in violation of the WAP and the Wetland Conservation Act. The other wetland potentially affected by the proposed development is the largest basin located just east of center in Figure 4. This wetland was restored and is under a perpetual Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) Reserve Program easement. The Natural Resource Conservation Service, NRCS, is the holder of this easement and must approve any changes to the hydrology of this wetland. No jurisdictional wetland boundary determination or delineation has been performed on this wetland. The RIM easement exists up to the 901.5 foot elevation. Based upon soils, hydrology, existing drainage patterns and topography, it is highly probable that the wetland extends well beyond the water's edge. This is of importance when considering the proposed road alignment which would be directed through this Tinge wetland area south of the wetland. The existing east -west trail visible in Figure 5 is the approximate centerline of the proposed road. A wetland delineation will be needed to determine the extent of the wetland. Depending upon the findings, any proposed impacts will require a showing that sequencing conditions are met and that they will be mitigated for at the required ratio if allowed. Avoidance must always be the first consideration. 'this wetland, although identified as a Manage 1 wetland, would actually be classified as a Preserve wetland based upon the existence of the RIM easement which was unknown at the time our wetland inventory was performed. This classification requires a 40-foot buffer and a 40- foot setback of primary structures from the buffer. Although outside of the Bluff Creek Overlay District, the road should be aligned to stay out of the buffer and setback. Woodlands Wetland Alteration Permit *' The filling of the wetland and subsequent construction of the pond resulted in removal of a significant area of woodland. Further removal has taken place north of the new pond in an area outside of the approved wetland mitigation plan (see Figure 2). The proposed plan would remove approximately three additional acres of woodland. This removal would create additional a 3" :o f" Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 13 of 43 woodland edge which would be highly susceptible to colonization by European buckthorn, garlic mustard and other invasive species. This removal would result in further fragmentation of the natural corridor that exists currently. Finally, this removal would result in a decrease of interception of rainfall and an increase in runoff, ultimately leading to further degradation of Bluff Creek. The previously submitted hydrologic model shows that runoff from the site increases from 501/6 to over 100% depending upon the rainfall event for the proposed plan. Bluffs There are no areas within the proposed grading area that meet the criteria of "blufF' as defined in City Code. The Bluff Creek Overlay District has additional requirements for impervious coverage based upon slopes. Section 20-1556. Impervious Coverage and Slopes Within the secondary zone of the BCO district, areas with average slopes exceeding 25 percent shall be preserved in their natural states and maintained as permanent open space. Areas with average slopes less than 25 percent but greater than ten percent shall not exceed an impervious surface coverage of 25 percent. Because no development is to occur within the primary zone, this language is only mentioned as it pertains to the secondary zone. Most of the wooded area within the proposed grading limits exceeds ten percent slopes. Further, the majority of the soils within the wooded area are classified highly erodible land or potentially highly erodible land. Impervious Coverage Calculations were not provided to show the breakdown of impervious coverage within the primary zone or secondary zone. The following calculations are based upon planimetric calculations with the plan set. A planimeter is a tool used to calculate areas from a two- dimensional paper drawing. Some discrepancies are inherent when using this tool. Based upon the planimetric calculations, 5.75 acres of Lot 1 is within the primary zone. This does not include the proposed road and pond. The pond is entirely within the primary zone as is most of the proposed road. It is estimated, based upon the figures obtained from the planimeter, that 43.9% of that portion within Lot 1 will be impervious surface. Nearly 100% of the secondary zone will be impervious surface. Based upon the hydrologic calculations provided by the consulting engineer, runoff volumes for a one-year event will more than double for the entire site and nearly triple at the discharge under Powers Boulevard to Bluff Creek. This discharge point will experience a 57% increase in runoff volume for a ten-year event while discharge from the entire site will increase by 51 % for the same rain event. This condition will likely be mitigated for somewhat because it does not discharge directly to Bluff Creek but instead into the adjacent wetland. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 14 of 43 Mitigation The project proposes construction of the building, an access drive, parking and retaining wall, as well as a storm water pond and public street within a portion of the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone. The encroachment into the primary zone and setback requires a variance. To mitigate for the impacts to the primary corridor, the applicant should submit a plan for the restoration of areas adjacent to the Bluff Creek Corridor with species consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan. Additionally, the developer should be required to meet green construction standards to mitigate the impacts in the primary zone through the enhanced environmental benefits from the green construction. The applicant is requesting a variance to encroach into the primary zone. This variance needs to be the minimum necessary to accomplish the goals. A variety of practices and designs are available and could potentially decrease the total impact to the primary zone. These should be evaluated in an attempt to minimize these impacts. This includes, but is not limited to, alternative stormwater design, disconnected pavement areas, pervious pavement and the establishment of forested areas. Various products are available to allow for storage and treatment of stormwater under the parking lot. This would reduce or eliminate the need to place the pond in Outlot B and subsequently remove those trees further minimizing total land disturbance within the primary zone. Other options may be available to promote infiltration or abstraction of rainfall and decrease the resulting runoff volumes. The applicant should evaluate recognized low -impact development techniques as to their benefits, and incorporate these techniques where practicable to do so, or clearly show why they are not practicable. During previous iterations, there was discussion about using a four-story building and a parking ramp in the event that MnDOT does not turn back the right-of-way as anticipated. It may be possible to use the same design techniques to minimize the impact to the primary zone. In conjunction with the development of the site and to mitigate some of the natural feature impacts of the proposed development, the site developer should be required to meet standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines (MSBG), administered by the University of Minnesota Center for Sustainable Building Research. The area east of Lot 1 within Outlot A and the primary corridor of Bluff Creek shall be covered by a conservation easement, which shall be recorded with the first phase of the development. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. Due to the fact that this area of Outlot A is undevelopable (the property cannot get access to the west because of the 12 foot retaining wall, cannot be accessed to the public street because of the site grades and the existing wetland and wetland setbacks required for any development would not permit the siting of structures in this area) the land within the conservation easement could not be used in future phases for density transfer purposes. The city shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. Any wetland mitigation activities that are required within this area shall Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 15 of 43 have final approval by city staff. No additional activities shall be allowed within this area and access to the mitigation site shall be the existing path. The wooded areas of Lot 1 and Outlot B shall be covered by a conservation easement that restricts specific activities and prohibits any further development within the area. The granting of the variance to encroach into the Bluff Creek primary zone is unavoidable due to the configuration of Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17) and Highway 212 and the access to the site. This site is intended as a gateway location of the City. As such, it requires Approxmnate Area of Conservation Easement -T 1 � �.1 116( /l GY/TLOT A i oj,,��: a significant site presence. The easterly driveway is proposed to provide a separation between client, employee and surgical patient pickup traffic. Staff is recommending approval of the variance subject to the development incorporating mitigation strategies outlined above. SUBDIVISION REVIEW 1 I I 1 i r-- 1 I enp . I , 11 1 I 11 I 1-- -L J ` I �. I • I 1 1 1 l ,14� i Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 16 of 43 The developer, United Properties LLC, is proposing the creation of one lot and two outlets. Lot 1 is proposed for the development of the Powers Crossing Professional Center. Outlot A is reserved for future development. Outlet B contains the stormwater pond and a lift station site for the City of Chanhassen. The preliminary plat currently does not have a name. Staff recommends that the Plat continue the name of Butternut Ridge as Butternut Ridge First Addition. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL I { ♦ 1 'fir • l ♦ ♦�♦♦ •i 1 � I 1 ♦ - li!_ tl ♦ - - A gravel driveway extends from the curb cut on Powers Boulevard and accesses the flat area to the north of the pond. The pond was constructed in 2006 when the access for the MnDOT construction staging area was constructed. The trees south of the driveway have been cleared. The remainder of the area proposed for development is treed. The high point of area proposed for development is on the northeast corner of proposed Lot 1. The ridge continues along the northern property line. A drainageway extends from the east and discharges to the area proposed for development. The developer has submitted drainage calculations. The following illustrates the existing and proposed drainage areas. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 17 of 43 Existing drainage areas rroposeo orainage areas A summary of the existing and proposed drainage is as follows: Area Peak Disc har a cfs Existing Proposed Existing ProposedProposedl 1 yr 1 2 yr I 10 r 100 yr 1 yr 2 yr 10 yr 100 yr To Highway 212 ROW 2.10 ac 2.10 ac 1 1.3 1 2.1 1 5.1 9.5 1.7 2.6 5.8 10.4 To Highway 212 ROW 2.12 ac 1.02AM 1.5 1 2.4 5.6 10.2 2.0 2.6 4.5 6.9 To Powers Blvd pipe 0.71 ac 0.69 1.0 1.4 2.7 4.6 1.0 1.4 2.7 4.4 To off -site wetland 3.70 ac 3.32 1.8 3.0 7.5 14.2 2.0 3.1 7.4 13.6 To Powers Blvd ditch 7.42 ac 7.42 5.2 9.0 23.7 46.0 4.7 8.2 22.9 45.6 11.01 ac 12.30 ac n/a 0.24 ac 27.1 ac 27.1 ac The drainage calculations indicate that the post -development peak discharge rates increase to the Highway 212 right-of-way. A copy of the drainage calculations were forwarded to MnDOT for their review and comment. Although City staff has not received written comments, MnDOT staff has i indicated that the plans must be revised so that the peak discharge rates to their system do not increase. Q A drainage permit will be required from MnDOT. ! , The plans must also be modified so that the peak discharge to the off -site wetland does not increase under fully developed conditions. The drainage area shown in blue contains a drainageway. Under the proposed developed conditions a retaining wall will be constructed across the drainageway on the west side of the building. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 18 of 43 The developer proposes to install storm sewer to convey runoff from the drainageway underneath the retaining wall. The plans must be revised to provide either an overland emergency overflow or an additional outlet control structure at a higher elevation. The developer must submit a letter from an engineer stating that the retaining wall design can accommodate temporary ponding behind the wall. The runoff from the drainageway will not be treated in the proposed stormwater pond since the runoff is from an undeveloped area. The runoff will be conveyed to the Powers Boulevard drainage ditch on the southwest comer of the site via storm sewer pipe. The alignment of the storm sewer pipe must be redesigned to eliminate excess cover over the pipe. The plan indicates that the storm sewer in the northwest corner of the parking lot will connect to stone sewer installed with Highway 212. If MnDOT approves this connection, then the plans must be revised to show the existing pipe. Wetlands One wetland exists on the property. This wetland is located north and east of the proposed building site. A second wetland formerly existed on the site. This wetland was impacted under Wetland Alteration Permit #2006-32. Under this WAP, the applicant was to replace the wetland by creating new wetland adjacent to the formerly discussed wetland. This replacement, per the approved WAP and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, was to be constructed prior to or concurrent with the approved wetland impact. To date, in violation of the approved permit, this mitigation area has not been constructed. The applicant requested additional time so that several oak trees could be spaded out of the area and transplanted elsewhere on the site. Staff agreed to this request but only after the applicant produced an Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $5,000 identifying the City of Chanhassen as the beneficiary and the applicant agreed to have the restoration complete no later than June 1, 2009. The applicant has begun taking steps to create the mitigation area. The applicant will need to comply with all other conditions of the WAP. In the event that the restoration is not completed, this may constitute a violation of the '4 Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 19 of 43 Wetland Conservation Act and could, by law, require replacement at a ratio of as much as 4:1 in addition to other compensations. Ua _ rJ �_ — - 3 c`c N_ MO BMW NVOY Figure 2. Approved Wetland Grading and Mitigation Plan In addition to the previously identified wetland, at least one other wetland exists on or in proximity to the subject property such that the likelihood of wetland impact is significant. This wetland is a Preserve wetland which is in a Perpetual Reinvest In Minnesota Easement (RIM) and a perpetual Flowage Easement. Both easements are held by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture and are administered by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and are described as containing all land up to the 901.5. The proposed road alignment to the east appears to be outside of the RIM easement. However, the jurisdictional wetland boundary was never determined and is not identified anywhere within the plan set or in the Delineation Report prepared by Westwood Professional Services in August of 2006. A Preserve wetland requires a 40-foot buffer and a 40-foot setback from the buffer of primary structures. Secondary structures must be setback 20 feet from the buffer. A jurisdictional wetland boundary determination and delineation will be needed to determine the extents of the buffer and setbacks and the impact this will have on the road alignment. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 20 of 43 Surface Water Drainage The majority of the site drains to the Bluff Creek watershed. In the existing conditions, the drainage from the proposed mitigation area flows from northeast to southwest through an intermittent stream channel to what was formerly a Manage 1 wetland. This drainage currently is conveyed through the same channel to the existing stormwater pond. Because this water is "clean" it does not require treatment prior to discharge into the wetland located west of Powers Boulevard adjacent to Bluff Creek. The applicant has been instructed to direct this flow such that it bypasses the proposed stormwater pond, thus minimizing the pond size necessary to accommodate this volume and still meet National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) recommendations. It is apparent that there is an area of depression upstream of the proposed building site. It is quite conceivable that this area could be utilized to store runoff, thereby garnering extended detention and rate control. This practice was identified in the Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan, the Draft Bluff Creek Corridor Feasibility Study and in the Second Generation Surface Water Management Plan as one that would yield beneficial results in the limiting of erosion and sediment deposition within Bluff Creek. It is recommended that the applicant evaluate and utilize this practice as water will likely impound behind the proposed retaining wall in either case. By moving the inundation further from the retaining wall, the potential hazards of having water behind the wall will be minimized. The applicant is also proposing to increase peak discharge rates to the MnDOT system constructed for the TH 212 project. This practice is generally not accepted and MnDOT will need to comment as to whether they would allow this increase in peak discharge. The applicant is also requesting to berm a low area between the RIM wetland and the proposed mitigation area. This is not indicated on the plan set but was requested through conversations with City staff. The RIM wetland is not tributary to the Bluff Creek system and it does not appear that the proposed activity would result in a redirection of surface water drainage from one watershed to another. However, it will be incumbent upon the applicant to show that this is the case and to show that the creation of this berm will not result in a change in hydrology or hydraulics and will not have a deleterious impact on downstream properties and receiving water bodies. Drainage is directed to the RIM wetland from the south through a relatively well-defined swale. Under the proposed road alignment, this swale will be intersected by the road. Conveyance must be maintained from this swale to the RIM wetland. An appropriately sized and designed culvert needs to be installed under the proposed road to maintain this conveyance and prevent the possibility of erosion and sediment deposition. Erosion Control The applicant has provided a Grading and Erosion Control Plan for Phase Two but has not incorporated any of the changes requested by staff. Phase II is contingent upon MnDOT turning back a portion of the right-of-way to the land owner. In the event that the MnDOT right-of-way is not turned back to the applicant, this plan will not address erosion and sediment control issues Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 21 of 43 specific to site grading for Phase I only. If the applicant does not receive the tumback as anticipated, or does not grade the entire area as shown on the plan for any reason, a new plan set will be required specific to Phase I grading. As indicated in City Code, grading should be phased, where practicable to do so, such that the least amount of disturbed area is exposed at any one time. That the plan is designed for two separate phases indicates that it is practicable to do so. Staff recommends that a phasing plan be included with the erosion control to indicate the timing of when areas will be open. No Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was provided with this plan. The consulting engineer has stated that they will provide this as well as the additional erosion control best management practices with the construction level drawings. It has always been the practice of the City to require a full SWPPP and erosion control plans be submitted as part of the review process. Article II Section 18-40 (4)g states that a soil and erosion control plan are required as part of the submittal. Staff sees no compelling reason to deviate from this practice. In addition, the Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District will need to see these plans and comment on them. The development must comply with Carver Soil and Water Conservation District comments. These comments have been made available to the applicant and are incorporated by reference. In general, they require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan be developed and submitted for review per the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit. In addition to landscaping requirements, plantings are a part of the erosion control best management practices. The submittal does indicate landscaping trees and calls out a seed mix to be used on disturbed areas. Those disturbed areas adjacent to the remaining wooded areas will experience shaded conditions. The MnDOT 340 mix does not seem appropriate for these areas and staff recommends that a modified BWSR U7 seed mix be used instead. Further, those disturbed areas east of the proposed building and south of the proposed road which will not have buildings, parking or other permanent surface structures should be reforested with native deciduous tree species consistent with the existing species composition. Based upon the tree survey, this would indicate that bur oak should be used. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP) The following charges are based upon the 2008 SWMP fees for water quality and water quantity. These fees are consistent with Minn. Stat. § 103B. The site is an Office and Institutional zoning change. The acreage used to calculate the fees are based upon the assumption that the tuinback of MnDOT right-of-way will occur. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 22 of 43 Developable Acreage Calculations Area (ac) w/o Turnback Area (ac) w/ Turnback Lot 1 8.26 10.31 Outlot A 103.03 103.03 Outlot B 1.74 2.53 ROW 1.18 1.18 Total 1 114.21 1 117.05 Water Quality Fees The 2008 per acre water quality fees for commercial development is $6,820.00. Total developable acreage for build out is 11.21 acres. Based upon these figures, total estimated water quality fees for the development equals $76,452.20. Water Quantity Fees The 2008 per acre water quantity fees for commercial development is $17,400.00. Total developable acreage equals 11.21 acres. Based upon these figures, total estimated water quantity fee is $195,054.00. SWMP Credits The City of Chanhassen gives SWMP fee credits for on -site stormwater treatment. This credit is equal to one-half of the water quantity fee per acre of development treated in a NURP basin. According to the drainage calculations and figures provided by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., 8.93 acres of the developed site will be treated in the proposed pond. This results in a SWMP credit of $77,691.00. In addition, the pond outlet and the outlet for the bypass system each warrant a credit of $2,500.00 for an additional $5,000.00 credit. This means the estimated total SWMP credit is $82,691.00. Based upon the above fees and credits, the estimated SWMP fee due at the time of final plat is $271,506.20. RETAINING WALLS The developer proposes to construct two retaining walls: Location Length Maximum Height East of the building 440 feet 1 12 feet East of the proposed pond 230 feet 1 6 feet Building permits are required for retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 23 of 43 UTILITIES Lateral sanitary sewer and watermain to serve the proposed buildings will extend from the existing trunk utilities in Powers Boulevard. The developer will be responsible for extending lateral sanitary sewer and watermain to the east end of the access road; therefore, the sanitary sewer and water connection charges will be waived. A manhole must be installed at the terminus of the sanitary sewer. All sanitary sewer and watermain within Lot 1, Block 1 shall be privately owned and maintained. The storm sewer that will convey runoff from the drainageway to the east of the property shall also be privately owned and maintained, including those portions that lie within public right-of- way and the City owned outlot. The 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement shown on the preliminary plat over this storm sewer must be deleted. The plans include a 50-foot wide by 50-foot deep pad at the southeast comer of the Powers Boulevard/access road intersection. This pad will be within the same outlot as the proposed stormwater pond, which shall be deeded to the City. The City will construct a sanitary sewer lift station and forcemain under a separate contract. Staff anticipates that the forcemain will be directionally bored to minimize impacts. The preliminary plat includes a 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement extending from the lift station, east within the access road right-of-way, then northeast along the west side of an off - site wetland. Due to the variability associated with the forcemain installation, the 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement shall be replaced with a temporary blanket drainage and utility easement. A permanent 20-foot wide easement will be required over the final forcemain alignment. Each new lot will be subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. The 2008 trunk hookup charges are $1,769/SAC unit for sanitary sewer and $4,799/SAC unit for watermain. These fees will be collected with the building permit, subject to the rates in effect at the time of building permit, and shall be based on the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' SAC unit determination. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City s latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. All public utility improvements will require a preconstruction meeting before building permit issuance. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required, including the MPCA, Department of Health, Carver County and Watershed District. Upon project completion, as -built drawings must be submitted for the private utilities. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 24 of 43 STREETS/ACCESS The developer proposes to construct a public street from Powers Boulevard, approximately 600 feet south of the Highway 212 on ramp. A curb cut was constructed at this location when this segment of Powers Boulevard was constructed. The traffic study completed for the site indicates that a double left turn lane is required for southbound Powers Boulevard into the site. This turn lane must be constructed with Phase I improvements. The developer must coordinate this work with Carver County and provide additional right-of-way, if needed. The traffic study also indicates that the intersection at Powers Boulevard will likely warrant a traffic signal when the second building phase is constructed. The 2005 AUAR traffic analysis did not include a traffic signal at this intersection because at that time a through street was not proposed on the subject property because lower density development was projected. The traffic study indicates that the full buildout of this property will warrant the traffic signal; therefore, the developer must pay a cash fee with the final plat to cover the cost of the traffic signal. Staff will determine the signal cost prior to final plat approval. The public street will be 50 feet wide. The plans include turn lanes from the access road into the site. An 80-foot wide right-of-way will be platted to accommodate the access road, including the turn lanes. A temporary roadway, drainage and utility easement must be provided over the cul- de-sac at the east end of the access road. This property is subject to the Arterial Collector Fee which is $3,600 per developable acre. The acreage used in this calculation shall include the right-of-way tumback from both Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. This fee shall be paid in cash with the final plat. Submit proposed names for the street labeled "Access Road" on plans for approval. TREE PRESERVATION Tree canopy coverage and preservation calculation for the subdivision are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands and bluffs) 559,310 sq ft Total canopy area (excluding wetlands and bluffs) 221,675 sq ft Baseline canopy coverage 40% Minimum canopy coverage allowed 20% or 111,862 sq ft Proposed tree preservation 22% or 124,341 sq ft The applicant meets minimum requirements for tree preservation. All of the existing wooded areas within the proposed subdivision are within the Bluff Creek primary and secondary corridors. Because of this, the applicant was asked to minimize grading and tree removal in the development and revise the original grading plan. The revised grading does not present any changes. The tree removal remains identical to the original proposal. The intent of the primary corridor, to protect the watershed of Bluff Creek, has not been met by the proposed plan. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 25 of 43 To mitigate for the effects of development within the primary corridor, the developer should be required to meet green construction standards for the whole site. In wooded areas within the grading limits, staff recommends that all resulting openings be reforested with native trees. There are multiple sites that can be reforested along the eastern wooded area and along the east end of the access road. Tree planting sites are also available around the proposed pond to the south. Tree species shall be selected from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native species list. Staff recommends that the area east of Lot 1 within Outlot A and the primary corridor of Bluff Creek be covered by a conservation easement. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. A legal description of the area is included in the report. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. Any wetland mitigation activities that are required within this area shall have final approval by City staff. No additional activities shall be allowed within this area and access to the mitigation site shall be the existing path. Staff recommends that the wooded areas of Lot 1 and Outlot B also be covered by a conservation easement that restricts specific activities and prohibits any further development within the area. The applicant is proposing to save several large oaks along the eastern grading limits. Staff recommends that the following practices be required in order to insure the best chance of survival for the oaks: understory trees near the oaks shall be preserved, roots at the grading limits shall be cut cleanly with a trencher or vibratory plow and tree preservation fencing shall be installed prior to any grading. Preserving the existing grade as far out as possible from the base of the tree would be very beneficial. The applicant could install a second retaining wall that would protect the existing grade and reduce grading. PARKS AND RECREATION PARKS A primary component of the 1997 Park, Open Space and Trail Referendum was acquisition of a large, highly desirable parcel of open space. The "Fox" woods located north and east of the proposed Powers Crossing Professional Center contains the largest forested preserve in the city's park system. Collection of a park dedication fee in lieu of acquisition of additional open space as a condition of approval for the Powers Crossing project is recommended. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 26 of 43 TRAILS Powers Boulevard Trail: This existing section of trail was installed concurrent with the extension of Powers Boulevard. This trail transports people north and south between the proposed access road and the on/off ramp at Highway 212. • Access Road Trail: Designation and construction of this 10-ft. wide trail on the north side of the proposed access road is consistent with the comprehensive plan and, when extended east, will serve as an important east/west trail connection between Powers Boulevard and Highway 101. • North Trail: Construction of the 10-ft. wide "North Trail' as a condition of approval of this subdivision will satisfy an important pedestrian connection. The intersection of Powers Boulevard and the MT" Powers Crossing .. ^'E" q"'" Trail Map ^iFlYOTpIY meFCaMuauM�Fw4e' Mum .. Highway 212 on/off ramp will serve as a key trailhead location in the future. An extensive trail system will be developed in the park preserve serving as a primary attractor to this area. In addition, a future second regional trail connection will extend from this intersection northeast along a large wetland and running parallel with Highway 212. This particular section of trail will extend to the intersection of Highway 101 and Lyman Boulevard serving as a commuter bikeway in addition to a recreational trail. The current design as shown in the plan set for the North Trail is not acceptable. Assuming that the MnDOT right-of-way at this location will remain fenced, the trail should be set back a minimum of 3 feet from the fence to safely allow for winter plowing and snow storage. Similarly, a minimum 3-foot boulevard (6 feet or more being preferred) should be maintained between the trail and the parking lot, again for winter maintenance and snow removal, but more importantly to create an aesthetically pleasing and inviting trail corridor and property boundary. Future Trail: A future trail connection to the park preserve will start at the South East Corner of Lot 1, Block 1. To accommodate this future trail alignment a triangular shaped permanent trail easement will be needed at this location. (Reference Trail Map) Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 27 of 43 COMPLIANCE TABLE Areas . ft Frontage (ft.) Depth (ft.) Notes Code 15,000 75 150 Lot 1 359,689 488 737 8.26 ac. (10.31 ac. with MnDOT land) 103.03 ac. Future Outlot A 4,487,987 Development Area less the area of the conservation easement 1.74 ac. (2.53 ac. with Outlot B 75,911 MnDOT land) Storm water pond ROW 51,623 1.18 ac. TOTAL 4,975,210 114.21 ac. (117.05 ac. with MnDOT land MnDOT will be reconveying approximately 2.8 acres of land back to the property owner. This land represents excess right-of-way taken for the construction of Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE The developer is proposing a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot medical office building, and up to a 731-stall, five - level parking ramp. The full buildout is predicated upon a tumback to the land owner of MnDOT right-of-way. In the event that thisturnback does not occur, the applicant has requested to build a four-story building totaling 112,000 square feet. The Office Institutional (OI) District limits building height to two stories. The proposed number of stories for both the building and parking ramp exceed the district regulations, by one and four stories respectively. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance from these standards in conjunction with the site plan review. The applicant is also requesting a variance from the sign ordinance to permit a larger monument sign in conjunction with the project. Finally, the applicant is requesting a variance from the setback requirements in the OI district and Bluff Creek corridor. While the development had originally been contemplated as a planned unit development (PUD), staff felt that OI zoning with a variance request was more appropriate for the site since this project would be a single building and one accessory structure. The PUD Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 28 of 43 district is a better zoning district for mixed use or highly complex developments. The OI district, in this case, provides an adequate and limited range of development for the lot. The need for the variances is due to the type and function of building. This site is intended as a gateway location of the City. As such, it requires a significant site presence. To do this with a one or two story structure would not provide the same impact as a taller building and would require even greater encroachment into the Bluff Creek Primary zone. As part of staffs initial discussions with the developer, staff had recommended that the building be pushed as close to Powers Boulevard as possible. However, due to the need for the reconveyance of the excess right-of-way back to the property owner, the uncertainty of timing for such turnback, and the site user's desire to have the building overlooking the natural area east of the site, the developer has located the building as far east on the property as was feasible given the requirements for setback and parking. The first phase of the development consists of a three-story, 88,000 square -foot building, comprising the south half (72,000 square feet) and the main entrance area (16,000 square feet) of the building. The second phase would add the north half of the building and the parking ramp structure. The timing of the phasing is indeterminate at this time, but shall rely on market conditions. In order to mitigate some of the natural feature impacts of the proposed development, the site developer should be required to meet standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines (MSBG), administered by the University of Minnesota Center for Sustainable Building Research. LEED activities provide a point system for a project. The minimum scoring necessary for LEED certification would be 26 points. The maximum scoring is 59 points, which provides a Platinum certification. An example of a project with Platinum certification is the Great River Energy Corporation in Maple Grove, Minnesota. Green design not only makes a positive impact on public health and the environment, it also reduces operating costs, enhances building and organizational marketability, potentially increases occupant productivity, and helps create a sustainable community. MSBG requires development to comply with four sustainable categories: performance management, site and water, indoor environmental quality, and materials and waste. This system functions on a base standard (Buildings, Benchmarks and Beyond, B3). Sustainable design is a means to reduce energy expenditures, enhance the health, well-being and productivity of the building occupants, and improve the quality of the natural environment. The Minnesota Legislature required the Departments of Administration and Commerce, with the assistance of other agencies, to develop sustainable building design guidelines for all new state buildings funded by bond money after January 15, 2004. According to the legislation, the guidelines must: Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 29 of 43 • Exceed the energy code in effect in January 2004 by at least 30 percent • Achieve lowest possible lifetime costs for new buildings • Encourage continual energy conservation improvements in new buildings • Ensure good indoor air quality • Create and maintain a healthy environment • Facilitate productivity improvements • Specify ways to reduce material costs • Consider the long-term operating costs of the building including the use of renewable energy sources and distributed electric energy generation that uses a renewable source of natural gas or a fuel that is as clean or cleaner than natural gas. Size Portion Placement Due to site topography and proposed grading, the main entry to the building is located on the west elevation of the building. The entry is highlighted by being recessed in the middle of the ultimate building with a canopy covering the entrance and drive-up/drop-off. The entrance consists of expanded storefront window treatments. Material and Detail and Color The developer is proposing the use of three colors of face brick (light iron spot (reddish -brown), beige velour (tan), and limestone (white) as the primary building material. Accent bands and columns use a cream stone. The end cap of the building consists of a bronze metal panel and gray window curtain walls. The building facade is articulated through the use of projecting columns along the first floor elevation as well as projected segments incorporating vertical glass panels spaced along the building front. The lower level consists of larger window openings than the upper stories. The parking garage continues the use of the face brick. However, it appears as if only one brick color is proposed. Staff would recommend that the architecture of the primary structure be continued on the garage through the use of the three brick colors as well as the use of stone and metal. Height and Roof Design The project proposes a flat roof with raised towers for stairwells and elevators. The variety of roof heights add architectural detail and articulation to the building. The highest roof/parapet height is 55 feet. A one-story canopy is provided over the drop-off entry to the building. Facade Transparency Fifty percent of the first floor elevation that is viewed by the public shall include transparent windows and/or doors. All other areas shall include landscaping material and architectural detailing and articulation. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 30 of 43 Site Furnishing Community features may include landscaping, lighting, benches, and tables. The developer shall provide secure bicycle racks and/or storage (within 200 yards of a building entrance) for 5% or more of all building users (measured at peak periods), and provide shower and changing facilities in the building. The developer shall also provide benches throughout the site as well as tables and chairs in the patio area. Loading Areas, Refuse Area, etc. Screening of service yards, refuse and waste removal, other unsightly areas and truck parkingdoading areas is accomplished through the location of this area on the east side of the building. Landscaping Phase I Minimum requirements for landscaping include 13,002 square feet of landscaped area around the parking lot, 52 trees for the parking lot, and bufferyard plantings along the north, south and west property lines. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Phase I Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 13,002 s . ft. >13,002 s . ft. Trees/landscape area 52 canopy trees 23 canopy trees Landscape islands/peninsulas 20 islands/peninsulas 15 islands/peninsulas PHASE II Vehicular use landscape area 12,065 s . ft. >12,065 s . ft. Trees/landscape area 48 canopy trees 35 canopy trees Landscape islands/peninsulas 1 19 islands/peninsulas 16 islands/ eninsulas The applicant does not meet required landscape quantities for parking lot trees and islandstpeninsulas in both phases. The applicant must meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees and landscape islands/peninsulas. In Phase II, increasing the interior width/planting area of the three islands currently proposed to be planted with perennials would serve to meet ordinance requirements. The three islands would need to specify overstory tree plantings. The interior width of the landscape islands in either Phase does not meet ordinance minimums. All landscape islands must have a minimum interior width of 10 feet inside the curbs. This includes the two islands that incorporate a sidewalk. There must be a 10-foot width of growing space in addition to the island. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 31 of 43 Required Proposed Phase I Proposed Phase II North property line 11 canopy trees 8 canopy 10 canopy bufferyard B — 570' 22 understory trees 15 understory 22 understory 34 shrubs 0 shrubs 36 shrubs West property line. 14 canopy trees 2 canopy 14 canopy bufferyard B — 720' 28 understory trees 7 understory 27 understory 43 shrubs 0 shrubs 49 shrubs South property line 11 overstory 12 overstory 12 overstory Boulevard trees — 350' Phase I: The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for either of the bufferyard areas. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to meet minimum requirements. Phase II: The applicant is short one overstory tree in the north bufferyard. The applicant shall increase the plantings to meet minimum requirements. In the proposed plant schedule, the applicant must replace the Colorado spruce with another approved evergreen species. All transplanted materials must be pre -approved by the City. Transplanted trees will not be accepted if substituted without City approval. If approved for transplanting, the material must be warranted for a minimum of one year. If transplanted materials die, then they must be replaced with nursery stock. Lot Frontage and Parking Location Parking is distributed on the west and north sides of the building. The applicant is proposing proof of parking which includes adding additional levels of parking to the ramp in the future should site parking become an issue. The City may allow reductions in the number of parking spaces actually constructed as long as the applicant provides a proof of future parking plan. The City may require the installation of the additional parking whenever the need arises. Staff supports the use of proof of parking to reduce impervious surface until an actual demand for additional parking makes additional spaces necessary. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 32 of 43 I \ .11 The developer is also proposing parking closer to the property line than permitted in the OI district. In all of the non-residential zoning districts, except the Central Business District which has no required setback, the standards permit reduction of the parking setback to 10 feet provided landscaping and berming are proposed. The developer shall comply with the minimum parking setback requirement and install appropriate berming and or landscaping to allow the 10 feet setback. The development incorporates berming along Powers Boulevard. The parking on the north side of the property, while 12 feet from the property line, will be over 55 feet from the Highway 212 on ramp. LIGHTING/SIGNAGE The developer is proposing the use of 30-foot tall site lighting with shoebox type fixtures, which complies with City Code. The plan specifies metal halide lamp type. City Code requires high- pressure sodium lighting. The light fixtures shall be revised to high-pressure sodium lighting. The applicant is requesting a 4-foot 8-inch height variance from the 5-foot sign height limitation to permit a 9-foot 8-inch tall sign and a 22 square -foot sign area variance from the 24-square foot sign display area limitation to permit 46 square feet of sign display area. A [sign] variance may be granted from the requirements of this ordinance where it is shown that by reason of topography or other conditions, strict compliance with the requirements of this ordinance would cause a hardship; provided that a variance may be granted only if the variance does not adversely affect the spirit or intent of this ordinance. While staff believes that some type of sign relief is necessary, the sign height request appears excessive, considering that the development will also be able to install wall signage on their building. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 33 of 43 The monument sign is proposed for the southwest corner of the site. The sign is proposed in property that must be turned back by MnDOT. Until the land is turned back, any signage must be located on private property. This is a logical location for the building monument sign. This area, with a base elevation of 886, is approximately 8 feet higher than Powers Boulevard just north of the access road. However, the base height is 14 feet lower than the grade elevation at the northwest comer of the site. The OI signage criteria are usually used for a single -tenant building. The fact that there will be multiple tenants in the building leads to the need for additional area and size for the signage. The site is permitted only one monument -type sign. Staff believes that a compromise solution would be to permit the development to have signage consistent with the Industrial Office Park signage regulations which permits monument signs up to 8 feet in height with sign display area of 64 square feet. The development name in the monument sign shall be individual dimensioned letters with a minimum %-inch projection. The applicant is also proposing directional signage on the property. Such signage may be up to 5 feet in height with a sign area of 4 square feet. The sign height for these signs shall be reduced to 5 feet. The display area for sign #2 shall be reduced to 4 square feet. Additionally, the developer is showing areas for wall signage on the building. It should be noted that the logo is limited to 30 percent of the sign area. Staff will count the sign area of all the signage on a building elevation against the permitted sign area. The logo(s) then would be a percentage of this total sign area. The area of the wall signage must comply with the sign area standards for the OI district. A separate sign permit shall be required for all monument and wall signs. MISCELLANEOUS The buildings are required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. Accessible routes must be provided between commercial building(s), parking facilities and public transportation stops. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. All parking areas, including parking structure, must be provided with accessible parking spaces. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 34 of 43 COMPLIANCE TABLE Building Height ^ Building Setback Parking stalls 2 stories 1 story N-35' E*-40' W-35' S-35' Professional (Bldout) Phase I Clinic: 3 stories Parking: 5 stories N-45' E-0'@ W-153' 5-78' 3 stories 0 stories N-455' E*-0@ W - 235' S - 78' Phase I: 499 stalls 413 stalls, plus 107 stalls proof of parking Phase II: 940 stalls 761 stalls, plus 288 stalls proof of parking (medical offices: 1/150 sq. ft. of floor area; standard offices: 5 per 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area for the first 50,000 sq. ft.; then 4 per 1,000 for the next 50,000 sq. ft., then 3 per 1,000 for the balance of the building) Parking Setback N - 25' E* - 40' N - 12' E - 0' @ N - 73' E - 0' @ W-25' 5-35' W-24' S-27' W-87' 5-27' (Parking setbacks on public streets may be reduced to 10 feet with the use of berming and landscaping.) Hard surface 65% 59% Coverage Lot Area 0.34 acre 8.26 acres (10.31acres with MnDOT land) ^ The applicant is requesting a variance to permit a three-story building and up to a five -story parking ramp. Should the MnDOT land tumback not occur, then the applicant has an alternate request to permit a four-story building. * Setback from the Bluff Creek Primary Zone. @ The applicant is requesting a variance to encroach into the primary zone. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 35 of 43 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motions and adoption of the attached findings of fact and recommendation: A. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, Butternut Ridge First Addition, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional District, OI." B. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit with Variances to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; subject to the following conditions: 1. The property line may be revised to incorporate the rewnveyed property from MnDOT to the developer. 2. The developer shall meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines (MSBG). 3. To mitigate for the effects of development within the primary corridor, the developer should be required to meet green construction standards for the whole site. 4. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. 5. Evaluate other site designs, stormwater management techniques and low -impact development practices for their benefit in reducing impacts to the primary and secondary zones of the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 6. Reforest those areas disturbed to grade the site but do not have structures on them. The reforestation should be done with deciduous tree species representative of the existing species composition. The forested areas are dominated by bur oak. 7. Maintain the natural drainage patters. 8. The applicant must clearly illustrate how impacts to the primary zone are to be mitigated. This mitigation must consider all benefits derived from the primary zone as described in Article XXXI of the Chanhassen City Code. 9. The area east of Lot 1 within Outlot A within the primary corridor of Bluff Creek shall be covered by a conservation easement. This easement shall restrict activities within the area Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 36 of 43 and prohibit any development. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. Any wetland mitigation activities that are required within this area shall have final approval by City staff. No additional activities shall be allowed within this area and access to the mitigation site shall be the existing path. 10. The wooded areas of Lot 1 and Outlot B within the Bluff Creek primary zone shall be covered by a conservation easement that restricts specific activities and prohibits any further development within the area." C. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the Subdivision Preliminary Plat creating one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-of- way, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to the following conditions: 1. Revise the Plat name to Butternut Ridge First Addition. 2. The developer shall either dedicate/donate an Outlot or record a conservation easement containing the Bluff Creek Primary zone north of the road right-of-way in Outlot A. A conservation easement shall be recorded over the Bluff Creek Primary zone located within Lot 1 and Outlot B. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. The easement shall be recorded with the first phase of the development. 3. Submit proposed names for street labeled "Access Road" on plans for approval. 4. The drainage report and plans must be revised to address comments from MnDOT. 5. The applicant must obtain a MnDOT drainage permit. 6. The drainage report and plans must be modified so that the peak discharge rate to the off -site wetland does not increase under fully developed conditions. 7. The plans must be revised to provide either an overland emergency overflow or an additional outlet control structure at a higher elevation. 8. The developer must submit a letter from an engineer stating that the retaining wall east of the building can accommodate temporary ponding behind the wall. 9. The alignment of the bypass storm sewer pipe must be redesigned to eliminate excess cover over the pipe. 10. If MnDOT allows a connection to the Highway 212 storm pipe, then show the existing pipe on the plan sheets. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 37 of 43 11. Building permits are required for retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 12. A manhole must be installed at the terminus of the sanitary sewer. 13. All sanitary sewer and watermain within Lot 1, Block 1 shall be privately owned and maintained. 14. The storm sewer that will convey runoff from the drainageway to the east of the property shall also be privately owned and maintained, including those portions that lie within public right-of-way and the City owned outlot. 15. The 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement shown on the preliminary plat over this storm sewer must be deleted. 16. Delete the 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement for the future watermain. 17. Provide a temporary blanket drainage and utility easement over the proposed forcemain corridor. 18. A permanent 20-foot wide easement will be required over the final forcemain alignment. 19. Each new lot will be subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. These fees will be collected with the building permit, subject to the rates in effect at the time of building permit, and shall be based on the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' SAC unit determination. 20. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 21. All public utility improvements will require a preconstruction meeting before building permit issuance. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required, including the MPCA, Department of Health, Carver County and Watershed District. 22. Upon project completion as -built drawings must be submitted for the private utilities. 23. The double left turn lane on southbound Powers Boulevard must be constructed with Phase I improvements. 24. The developer must coordinate the construction of the double left turn lane with Carver County and provide additional right-of-way, if needed. 25. The developer must pay a cash fee with the final plat to cover the cost of the traffic signal. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 38 of 43 26. A temporary roadway, drainage and utility easement must be provided over the cul-de-sac at the east end of the access road. 27. This property is subject to the Arterial Collector Fee which is $3,600 per developable acre. The acreage used in this calculation shall include the right-of-way tumback from both Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. This fee shall be paid in cash with the final plat 28. The RIM and Flowage Easements need to be indicated on the plat. This should include the document number 10-05-87-1. 29. The wetland mitigation area in Outlot A needs to be created. A Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants needs to be executed and recorded with Carver County. This document number needs to be included on the plat. 30. The remaining conditions of approval for WAP #2006-32 need to be met: a. The plans shall be revised to show how M-1 will be accessed. The access route shall be stable, shall avoid damage to significant trees (greater than 10" DBH) and shall avoid impacts to natural dramageways and any jurisdictional wetlands that may exist on site that were not delineated by Westwood Professional Services in August 2006. b. A planting plan for M-1, including invasive vegetation management techniques, species to be planted, proposed planting rates, and the approach to upland buffer restoration, shall be submitted prior to final City Council approval. c. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit equal to 110% of the cost of the wetland creation (including grading and seeding) to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland are met. The letter of credit shall be effective for no less than five years from the date of final plat approval. The applicant shall submit a cost estimate for wetland creation (including grading and seeding) so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of credit. d. A five-year wetland replacement monitoring plan shall be submitted. The replacement monitoring plan shall include a detailed management plan for invasive non-native species, particularly hybrid cattail, purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. The plans shall show fixed photo monitoring points for the replacement wetland. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. 31. The legal wetland boundary of the RIM wetland was not delineated in the Westwood Wetland Delineation Report dated August of 2006. This boundary must be delineated and wetland impacts avoided where possible. 32. Because of the perpetual RIM and flowage easements the plans must be provided to the Natural Resources Conservation Service for review and comment. Any comments from the NRCS must be made available to the City. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 39 of 43 33. Drainage to the RIM wetland from the south flows through a defined swale. The conveyance of this flow must be maintained under the proposed road extension. 34. Erosion Control plan needs to be updated per the July comments: a. Show a 75-foot rock construction entrance. b. Show rounding of corners for proposed grades. c. Erosion control blanket shall be shown on all slopes east of the proposed building and adjacent to the pond. d. An NPDES permit must be obtained prior to any site grading and a SWPPP must be provided to the City for review and comment. e. Replace MnDOT 340 mix with a modified BWSR U7 seed mix. 35. Estimated SWMP fees due at the time of final plat are $271,506.20. 36. The development must comply with Carver Soil and Water Conservation District comments. 37. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. 38. The following practices are required in order to insure the best chance of survival for the highlighted oaks to be preserved along the east side of the development: a. Understory trees near the oaks shall be preserved. b. Roots at the grading limits shall be cut cleanly with a trencher or vibratory plow. c. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed prior to any grading. d. Trees shall be thoroughly watered during dry periods. 39. The applicant shall install a second tier to the retaining wall at the north end of the east side of the development to preserve the grade surrounding the oaks proposed to be saved. 40. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall be in place and maintained until all construction is completed. 41. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans, dated 10/06/08, will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 42. All trees removed shall be chipped or hauled off site. No burning permits shall be issued. 43. The developer shall pay the full park dedication fee in force at the time of final plat approval and prior to recording. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 40 of 43 44. Construction of the 10-ft. wide bituminous access road trail and the North Trail. The North Trail plans shall be modified dedicating a permanent 20-foot wide trail easement to allow for appropriate separation from adjoining improvements and boulevard areas for winter plowing, snow storage and aesthetics. 45. Dedication of a permanent triangular shaped trail easement at the South East comer of Lot 1, Block 1. The triangle shall be 50' in length on its South side and 200' in length on its East side." D. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the Site Plan with Variances for building height and Bluff Creek Primary Zone setbacks for Planning Case #08-16, for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office building, and up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp on Lot 1, Block 1 of the development, plans prepared by Pope Associates, Inc. and Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final plat for the development shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The full buildout is predicated upon a tumback to the land owner of MnDOT right-of-way. In the event that this turnback does not occur, the applicant may build a four-story building totaling 112,000 square feet subject to parking compliance with City Code. 3. The developer shall meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines, MSBG. 4. The developer shall continue the architectural detailing through the use of the three brick colors as well as the use of stone and metal on the garage structure. 5. The developer shall provide secure bicycle racks and/or storage (within 200 yards of a building entrance) for 5% or more of all building users (measured at peak periods), and provide shower and changing facilities in the building. The developer should also provide benches throughout the site as well as tables and chairs in the patio area. 6. The light fixtures shall be revised to high-pressure sodium lighting. 7. The buildings are required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 8. The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 9. Accessible routes must be provided between commercial building(s), parking facilities and public transportation stops. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 41 of 43 10. All parking areas, including parking structure, must be provided with accessible parking. 11. The developer shall comply with the minimum parking setback requirement and install appropriate bernting and or landscaping to allow the 10 feet setback. 12. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 13. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. 14. The applicant shall install a second tier to the retaining wall at the north end of the east side of the development to preserve the grade surrounding the oaks proposed to be saved. 15. The applicant does not meet required landscape quantities for parking lot trees and islands/peninsulas in both phases. The applicant must meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees and landscape islands/peninsulas. 16. Phase I: The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for either of the bufferyard areas. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to meet minimum requirements. 17. Phase II: The applicant does not meet the minimum requirements for bufferyard areas. The applicant shall increase the plantings to meet minimum requirements. 18. The applicant must replace the Colorado spruce with other approved species in the plant schedule. 19. All transplanted materials must be pre -approved by the City. Transplanted trees will not be accepted if substituted without City approval. If approved for transplanting, the material must be warranted for a minimum of one year. If transplanted materials die, they must be replaced with nursery stock. 20. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall be in place and maintained until all construction is completed. 21. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans, dated 04/01/09, will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 22. All trees removed shall be chipped or hauled off site. No burning permits shall be issued. 23. The North Trail plans or parking lot design shall be modified to allow for appropriate boulevard areas for winter plowing, snow storage and aesthetics. Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 42 of 43 24. A 3-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, and nothing shall be placed in front of the hydrant outlets, connections, fire protection control valves that would interfere with fire fighter operations. Section 508.5 MN. Fire Code and Sec. 508.5.4. 25. No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be removed or chipped on site. 26. Contact the Chanhassen Fire Marshal for locations of "No Parking Fire Lane" signage, and locations of curbing to be painted yellow. MN Fire Code See. 503.3. 27. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. MSFC sec 501.4. 28. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. MSFC Sec. 503.2.3." and E. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve a sign size Variance request to permit an eight (8) foot tall sign with up to 64 square feet of sign display area, subject to the following conditions: 1. Separate sign permits shall be required for each sign. 2. The development name in the monument sign shall be individual dimensioned letters with a minimum %z-inch projection. 3. Only one monument sign shall be permitted for the Powers Crossing Professional Center site. 4. The sign height for the directional signs shall be reduced to five feet. The display area for sign #2 shall be reduced to four square feet. 5. The sign location shall meet all setback and site triangle requirements." Powers Crossing Professional Center Planning Case 09-06 May 5, 2009 Page 43 of 43 ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Letter of reinstatement from William P. Katter to Robert Generous Dated March 5, 2009. 3. Development Review Application. 4. United Properties Development Narrative Dated April 1, 2009. 5. Letter from Ryan M. Edstrom, Westwood Professional Services, Inc., to City of Chanhassen Planning Department dated September 4, 2008. 6. Chanhassen Medical Office Development Site Traffic Study Memorandum Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. dated September 4, 2008. 7. Chanhassen Fairview Medical Center Site Traffic Analysis, Dated July 3, 2008, Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 8. Memo from Mike Spack, Spack Consulting to Alyson Fauske dated October 10, 2008. 9. Letter from Chip Hentges, Carver Soil & Water Conservation District, to Robert Generous dated October 10, 2008. 10. Letter from Roger Gustafson, Carver County Public Works, to Robert Generous dated August 14, 2008. 11. Letter from William Goff, MnDOT, to Sharmeen Al-Jaff dated August 14, 2008. 12. Letter from William Goff, MnDOT, to Sharmeen Al-Jaff dated October 27, 2008. 13. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List. g\plan\2008 planting cases\08-16 fairview chanhassen medical cemer\staff report fcmc.doc G e! -- L (o Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 Dillon: I'll make a motion that the Chanhassen Planning Commission affirms the staff interpretation, Planning Case 09-05 for the property described as Lots 6 and 7, Sunset View Addition for the regulation regarding multiple dwelling units on a single family lot and requires the applicant to remove Buildings A and B in order to build a larger dwelling unit. Papke: Is there a second? Laufenburger: Second. Dillon moved, Laufenburger seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission affirms the staff interpretation, Planning Case 09-05 for the property described as Lots 6 and 7, Sunset View Addition for the regulation regarding multiple dwelling units on a single family lot and requires the applicant to remove Buildings A and B in order to build a larger dwelling unit. All voted in favor, except Thomas who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 5 to 1. Aanenson: Mr. Chair just for the record. Papke: Yes. Aanenson: Because this is a decision of, acting as a zoning appeal, anybody aggrieved of this decision, including the applicant has the right to appeal that decision and so they should do so within 10 days. Papke: Okay, thank you very much. The next item on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARING: POWERS CROSSING PROFESSIONAL CENTER: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH VARIANCES FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE BLUFF CREEK CORRIDOR; SUBDIVISION INTO ONE LOT, OUTLOTS AND DEDICATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: REZONING FROM AGRICULTURAL ESTATE (A2) TO OFFICEANSTITUTIONAL (OI). AND SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES FOR A TWO-PHASE, THREE STORY,160,000 SQUARE FOOT PROFESSIONAL CENTER UP TO A 731 STAFF, FIVE LEVEL PARKING RAMP AND SIGNAGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON OUTLOT A, BUTTERNUT RIDGE (SOUTHEAST CORNER OF POWERS BOULEVARD AND HIGHWAY 312). APPLICANT: UNITED PROPERTIES LLCfnMOTHY & DAWNE ERHART, PLANNING CASE 09-06. Public Present: Name Address Bill Katter, United Properties Dan Parks Paul Holmes Kevin Ellsworth 3500 American Blvd W, Minneapolis 55431 Westwood Professional Services Pope Associates 9601 Flintlock Trail 19 :CANNED Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 Johnnie Meyering 1050 Homestead Lane Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Papke: Debbie, we'll start with you. Put you on the spot. Larson: Thanks. I'm kind of overwhelmed so I don't have anything. Papke: Okay, Denny. Laufenburger: Bear with me as I go through my notes Mr. Chairman. Bob, could you just re- state, did you say that the parking on the north side of the property would be initially a 3 story parking lot? Generous: As part of Phase II. Laufenburger: Phase II. Generous: So once they do the expansion they would put in the parking ramp. Laufenburger: Okay so the first building would be the southern most building is that correct? Generous: Correct. Laufenburger: Okay. Then when they put in the second building, then that parking ramp goes in. Generous: That's when the ramp goes in, yes. Laufenburger: Alright. Can you speak to the soil stability, and the reason I ask the question is that I know that there was a time that a segment of Powers Boulevard, I think to the south and west of this proposed property, there was substantial work that had to be done to support, and I'm not saying that in you know city public works jargon, I understand, but can you just talk, is the city confident that the soil here is going to support this? Generous: I don't know if I'd be qualified. Alyson... Fauske: Chair Papke if I may answer the question. Commissioner Laufenburger, in this situation typically the applicant in this case would hire a soils engineer and they would do soils consolidation through compaction techniques and they would have the soils company test to make sure that they have adequate compaction. As you referred to there were some soils issues on the south side of Powers Boulevard and that's the very thing that they do. That they catch in time to make sure that they have a solid foundation for any structure. Laufenburger: So the assumption that I would make is that the city would be arm and arm with the developer to insure that all of those things are appropriately. 20 38 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 Fauske: Correct. It's with the building permit. They always get the soils testing. Laufenburger: Bob I know that there was some discussion about, and I know there's a table in here about what would happen if there's a 100 year flood or something like that. Just give me confidence that we're, oh excuse me. Alyson. Would you please give me confidence Alyson that should that 100 year flood be followed by another 100 year flood within a few weeks, that that replacement of the collection pond in Outlot A to Outlot B, that all of this, this whole thing is not going to fall apart. I'm thinking specifically of that retaining wall in that primary zone. Larson: And end up Eden Prairie. Laufenburger: Yeah, and end up in Eden Prairie. Well if it's goes to Chaska that's okay but. Excuse me. Sorry. Fauske: That's a very good point Commissioner Laufenburger. One of the things that we took a look at with our analysis of this application was that in the 100 year event there is some temporary ponding behind that wall, and since this is looking, since the applicant is here for some preliminary approval, we look to resolve that issue by the time the final plan comes through. Whether it be re -directing some of that water. It's fairly clean water. We could look at doing some sort of infiltration before it reaches that point. There's certainly numerous options. Whichever one works best for the applicant and directing the water, we certainly look forward to working with them on that. Laufenburger: Okay. I think just one more question Bob. Could you go back to the display, the picture that would show where the road that would connect Powers Boulevard with, on the west with 101 on the east. Can you just show us exactly where that proposed road would be. Generous: Well we only know two ends of that. We have the touch down on Powers Boulevard, and then approximate location across from Bandimere Park. It would be shifted to the north. There's two houses there south of Wilson's Nursery. Laufenburger: Yeah. Generous: And it'd be somewhere in that location would be the other connection point. Laufenburger: So what you don't know is what the maze looks like from there to the other side. Aanenson: That will be development driven. I just want to also add that Highway, the 101 corridor study looked at that touch down point so that's already been approved by MnDOT and the city staff so that's officially mapped and as a part of the AUAR for the other side, that was the other touch down point. So the rest of it, getting up the hill, making grades, the rest of it will be development driven as that project comes forward both, we put along the city's property that's shown in green shows the city owned park property. Or dark. The dark that's labeled park. There is some other preservation that we anticipate that we would do trade offs as part of extractions or you know density transfers or something on some of that other green property, so 21 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 however that lays out for development, the product type will lead where that road goes. Then as Bob indicated, the other point is just to tie in other vacant properties. The one to the south. How we get access to that. If we tie in other neighborhoods. We'll look at that at a future date but at this point none of the neighborhoods are being tied in at this point. Laufenburger: Okay. Aanenson: But we'll look at that at a future date. That's always our goal to see if we can make better access points. I don't know if you have anything else to add on that Alyson. Fauske: Kate made a very good comment members of the Planning Commission when we look at something like this where we have an opportunity with a large area developing to look at neighborhood connections and one thing that we do take a look at is safety. 96`h Street has a very poor intersection with Highway 101 and making a turning movement onto northbound 101 from 96th Street is perilous at times, especially during high traffic so we certainly want to look at, at the connections and at the point when these applications come in, we don't know when that will be, but we'll certainly have an opportunity for the residents to have a conversation with the developer and ask the questions why are you doing this and it, like Kate said, it's good planning to show how conceptually how those can be achieved. Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Chairman. That's all I had for right now. Dillon: Yeah, where is the sign that's going to be seeking the variance going to be located? Generous: It would be down in the southwest comer of this site. Off of the new public street and Powers Boulevard. And that would also be a condition of approval. Normally they would be allowed monument signs on each street frontage and one of the conditions is that they get the one sign. Laufenburger: So we're not giving approval to whether it's an animated or an electronic sign. We're just, all we're doing is the size. Generous: The size. Laufenburger: Okay. Generous: And the display area that they can build. Dillon: I've got other questions but I think they're probably better answered by the applicant. Papke: Okay, thank you. Kathleen. Thomas: Sure. I think the proposal is laid out incredibly well. I think it looks, you know after seeing the site and kind of being, take a look at like what's going to happen and listening to Alyson about the 100 year floods and you know just all the things that are being taken into account by the city, I don't have any questions. 22 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 Undestad: Just one to add Bob. The Bluff Creek, the overlay and moving the lines on there. And I see the trade off and I like that. It's good in there but who, what's the process of swapping Bluff Creek lines, primary corridor lines and things. Generous: It's up to the city to determine if it's appropriate. Undestad: So based on the trade off, that's what we're looking at is that. Generous: Exactly. Undestad: The developer's giving up this and we're going to give up that. Generous: And then also, part of it is if you look at the line, how it goes in and out of the property, it would be difficult to develop that site without some encroachment. Because it goes down and then back up and really there have been additional impacts that didn't show up on this original line. Undestad: Okay. Papke: Kind of following on that same line. The Planning Commission has been very consistent in defending the Bluff Creek overlay district. We've asked people to tear out patios and fire pits. Obviously this development is going to have a much bigger impact than that, and I'm reading here on page 17 of the staff report and there still seems to be some unresolved issues. We have water flowing into the Highway 212 right-of-way in the current plan and apparently MnDOT has indicated that that's not acceptable to them so it sounds like this isn't fully baked yet from a storm water management perspective or am I incorrectly interpreting the staff report? Fauske: Commissioner, Chair Papke. It's more of a matter of amount of water. You cannot, they cannot increase the peak discharge through the MnDOT right-of-way so it's a matter of redirecting that water elsewhere through the site. Papke: But by definition doesn't that mean then it goes into Bluff Creek? I mean there's only so many places for the water to go here. Fauske: We would like to. Papke: Perhaps the applicant can address that further. I see a head bobbing up and down. Fauske: They certainly could. Papke: Okay. But I just want to make sure, you know if I have one hot button on this whole development proposal I think it's fine, you know moving the overlay district lines, I think Mark makes a good point. You know it makes sense where we're putting it but I'm having difficulty swallowing how we're going to put in this big building with a big parking lot with a big parking ramp and not end up dumping a lot more water into Bluff Creek at peak times. And I want to 23 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 make sure that we're all comfortable with the strategy that's being followed here because we are making compromises here you know in moving back the Bluff Creek Overlay District. I want to make sure that we're doing the right thing for our surface water so. Okay, anything else from staff? Questions? Okay. With that if the applicant would like to step up to the podium and state your name and address for the record and tell us a little bit more about your proposal. Bill Katter: Good evening. Bill Katter with United Properties ... to be here with you all. Appreciate staffs thoroughness in preparing this. This is as Mr. Generous says a complicated development proposal. A lot of sensitive issues out here and we'll try to address those comments and concerns here but we found staff to be good to work with on this proposal so with that just a word about United Properties. We have been in business since 1917. We're one of the oldest developers in the Twin Cities and I would say the lion share of our development work has been in the southwestern Twin Cities. Some of our more notable projects are, the two most recent office towers at Normandale Lake Office Park in Bloomington and Centennial Lakes Office Park in Edina. We have done some development mostly one and two story projects in Eden Prairie, and this is our first significant project in the city of Chanhassen so we're very excited. Some background about how we arrived at this site and partnered up with Mr. Erhart. We had a very good customer, Fairview Southdale Hospitals was initially interested in opening up a large clinic and surgery center in this location and they came to us in 2007 and asked for a number of sites and information on various sites that they could put this facility and really as kind of a testament to the importance of this interchange with Powers Crossing chose this intersection principally for the reason that Powers Boulevard is an extension through a number of communities and feeds into this important new highway 212 corridor all the way from South Lake Minnetonka all the way down into this new freeway and then for that matter feeds into Pioneer Trail which is a major feeder through Chaska and Eden Prairie so it's a very strategic, central site in the southwestern communities. And as Mr. Generous described is I believe an important gateway to your community so, because of the traffic and street infrastructure here I think it's important just generally for the city to try to concentrate density near freeways like this and so I think in the scheme of things, the size and scope of this development is appropriate given the transportation infrastructure in place there. Traffic really doesn't ever enter residential areas to and from this project. It stays on major collector roads and gets right to the project so I think this is a very good use for this property. Let's see, with that I think I'll just talk generally about our site plan and oh, I should say one other thing here. Fairview, because a question had come up whether Fairview is still interested in this project and they have put us on hold because of the economic climate and we're finding that with a lot of our customers who hopefully will come back to the table here in the next 6 to 9 months and work that out with us, but in the meantime as a developer what we'd like to press forward with is getting this site shovel ready. We have plenty of other customers we'd like to present this site to. As you probably all know there are very significant corporate customers in the southwest market here that we would like to present the site to and in our business it's hard to present a site without entitlements to a customer. The first question we get is is the site ready to build on? Can you actually build what you're showing so that's what we're here for is to go ahead and request your approval to be able to deliver what we're proposing here so. With that the team on this project, and they're here and available for technical questions is Pope Associates, Paul Holmes, a principle there. Of that firm. Dan Parks of Westwood Professional Services and his firm did the engineering for this site. Again a very 24 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 complicated site and they are here to provide technical support to me. So let me just put a site plan up here. So what we showed here is the, is it okay? Can you all hear me if I step over here? Papke: Yeah. Bill Katter: This is the Phase I site plan and as the staff indicated this is a 88,000 foot building. Is really a 72,000 foot footprint for the office building and a connecting link, a two story connecting link of 16,000 feet. The idea here was that if we ever build Phase II here, we have a common lobby and stairwell system that we don't have to duplicate in the Phase H building and can link up with minimal interruption to the site and the building. We could literally build the separate building and then open up that shared southern wall into the shared common lobby so that was the genesis of this. Site, building placement out here is really a key issue that we worked with staff on and granted if there weren't a number of significant factors we would have considered moving the building out onto Powers Boulevard. Let me just tell you what some of those were. Most importantly the customer at the time, Fairview and a number of the other physician practices we talked to wanted the relationship of the building into the natural setting there. They felt that was a very good healing environment for their patients that visited the building and they wanted to maintain a close relationship and view into those woods. Secondly, in the health care business privacy is critical and as you know there's an existing trail here on Powers Boulevard and it would be very sensitive to have a trail immediately adjacent to a professional medical building. Thirdly it's inevitable in buildings of this size that we will need loading facilities and you know they generate significant amounts of garbage and recycling and in a building out here there's really no way to shelter that from public view and so pushing the building further into the site allowed us to screen those activities at the rear of the building where they're not visible really to anybody. And lastly there was some issues with respect to being able to get two points of access into the site, which would have been difficult to accomplish if we had pulled that building up here from a spacing standpoint so that's how we arrived at the site plan here. With that, with the Phase I building I think it was mentioned we would grade the entire site that Mr. Erhart at present owns. We will, we have been attempting to obtain the turn back from MnDOT. It's not clear whether that will happen prior to Phase I or not. If it doesn't, this what we show here assumes it will not but certainly will be needed to support the expansion of building, Phase II building. We would construct this road, this access road which would be a future extension into 101 to the east and that we've worked with staff on the alignment of this road. It does, I think a comment in the staff report is it could potentially infringe upon a wetland up in this area and we will continue to work with staff to make sure that road is aligned so we maintain the proper setbacks and buffers from that wetland area. It's, I think we did that but we'll have to revisit that and make sure we have that right. Additionally we recognize the many trees in this area of the site and the sensitive nature of grading in there and we introduced a fairly long and expensive retaining wall to limit our grading activities back into the east of the building. So we do plan to develop in that manner and to be as sensitive as possible about removing trees or affecting tree roots in this area. And additionally staff recommended that we reforest this as best as possible and the landowner, Mr. Erhart has been kind of harvesting and maintaining white oaks, native trees to the site out there so that we can do just that and re -plant that area. And then with respect to this pond outlet, we did the same thing. We introduced a retaining wall here to minimize the grading impacts to the east, southeast of the pond and try to limit our removal of trees in there. And then our, I don't know that our landscaping plan fully 25 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 represents what we intend to do there but we are thinking we would reforest as much of the area around that pond as possible again with the trees already on site. Or new trees and one of the staffs comments was that we don't have enough trees on site so we'll try to find a way to put some more trees around that pond. One of the nice things about those trees too is they, the root structure absorbs water and helps with pond drain down so. Another thing that we're accomplishing I think with this development is we are, the existing trail here, staff has asked that we grant a trail, a permanent trail easement to connect this existing path up through the east of the site and into the park area up here and we'll agree to construct that with Phase I of the project. Actually we may have to construct that contingent upon where, you know whether we can get the turn back from MnDOT and then move the trail if we're not able to get as much land or any land from MnDOT. And then we are also agreeing to construct within this right-of-way area a trail that would bring people off this trail up Powers Boulevard into the site and then connect to this existing trail. That is currently in place so. The development helps finish a number of connections I believe in the community there so. With respect to, and by the way I'll just mention here without getting into too much detail the floorplan of the building gives us a lot of flexibility for both professional, medical and office in the event that just a typical office user would elect to locate here so we tried to design it in a manner that's very flexible. Then I'll move to what happens with Phase H. Again without getting too redundant, it shows a twin building being added with this community wall that would be, we would build this and then we would connect into the, and share the main reception area with the existing building m place and then this ramp would be constructed with Phase II, depending on how big this ends up being. If it's constructed at the full 72,000 feet, we may need the flexibility to get up to 5 stalls but we show, or 5 levels but we show, I believe we show 2 or 3. 3 existing? Yeah, 3 existing and 2 proof of parking. The height of the ramp, assuming we build all 5 levels is still below the height of the building so it would not be a situation where the ramp height would exceed the building height. And then this drive, this drive at the back of the Phase I building would be extended so that cars could have a speedy exit into and out of this ramp without encumbering the front of the site and creating pedestrian issues there. With that I think I'll just show, it was not shown on the screen. I think it's just worth showing what the project looks like when both phases are built so that's what it would look like. It would be a 3 story Phase I building with a 2 story common entry and then Phase II would be the really the mirror of that building so. Okay, with that there's just a few things in the staff report I thought I would touch on here and then I'll try to address any comments or questions for me. And these, I think we'll be able to work all these out with staff here between now and the council meeting, although I'd like to just make them of record so that we know that, since there are many conditions in the staff report we'd have a chance to work through all those. Minor comment. We'd prefer not have Butternut Ridge as the plat name. I assume we can select the plat name. That sounds residential and we would like it to reflect a more commercial name like Powers Crossing so we'll work with staff on that. I think the report does identify a number of the drainage issues, whether we're putting more water into MnDOT's right-of-way and so forth. What we would simply do there is just direct the water flow into the pipe system, into the NURP pond and go the other way with it if MnDOT continues to have an objection there so it has to be treated, so it would have to be directed into that pond first. On page 22 of the staff report it talks about the fees, the stone water fees. I believe there's just an omission there. Total of fees, I think it fails to give credit for the credit that would be eligible for constructing the pond. We can confirm that but I think the $270,000 number should be reduced by the available credit for building that pond. The staff report requests a blanket, there's a storm 040 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 water interceptor pipe that has to be developed, or put in by the city in connection with development here and for support of other areas of the city, and I think the staff report it just mentions we need to figure out where that location is and an easement for it. It suggest a blanket easement. We would need to get that tighten up. If we have a site plan that's approved we wouldn't want for instance have that pipe located beneath the building so we'd want to work with staff here and identify the location of that easement. And then with respect to traffic, really just a couple of comments here. We were a little confused. The staff report talks about the need for a second inbound left turn lane with this development and we went back and looked at the County and MnDOT's comments on traffic. The City's traffic consultant or engineer, staff engineer I think on that and I don't think, I'm not sure it's consistent. I don't think he fully recommended two inbound, left turn lanes. We don't think those are needed so we'll work with staff to verify all of that. The other point on traffic was the traffic signal. It had us at just filing a final plat, putting up cash for the cost of that traffic signal. We'd like to work with staff on the timing of that. It isn't needed until the Phase II project so I think tying it to a Phase II building permit would probably be more appropriate than us depositing what's probably a quarter million dollars in cash right now for that. The second thing is, the mechanism, there are other properties that are going to benefit from that light and/or trigger it which there's the party to the west of this that is slated for office and you could have the situation where we build Phase I. We don't trigger the stop light and then that parcel comes in with an application ahead of our Phase II project and that triggers the light and yet we're paying for the light to support their, so we need to work that out. That wouldn't be a fair or reasonable way to handle that. And then lastly on landscaping, we recognize that we do not meet the ordinance with respect to the tree count and we will work with staff to try to improve tree count. There's, it's a little, we're a little cautious about over treeing a site. We designed our boulevard trees for 50 feet on center. We could push that back to 40 feet or 35 feet. We don't like to go much tighter than that because the trees don't have a chance to develop a full canopy and you get a situation where tree roots can interfere with each other. We will try to reforest the areas within the affected Bluff Creek overlay area or zone as best we can. It's also, we have to be cautious about digging in that area and planting new trees because we'd be potentially digging up roots of healthy trees there, so we just need to work through details on a plan for that. I guess that's really the extent of my comments so. Papke: Okay. Mark, start with questions. Undestad: No, nothing here. Thomas: I do not either. Thank you. Papke: Kevin? Dillon: My questions I had were addressed. Papke: Okay. Denny. Laufenburger: Nice job. I think this is going to be a great thing for us. Just, Bill right? Bill Katter: Yeah. 27 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 Laufenburger: Is there, I realize that Fairview has you on hold right now in your thinking. If you had to map a future, do you anticipate that this facility will be developed before the end of 2010? 2011? What's your thoughts? Bil] Katter: Well, don't know what the future holds. I would certainly hope that it would be by the end of 2010 with Phase I would be up. Absolutely. So we'll do our best on that. Laufenburger: Cool. Thank you. That's all Mr. Chairman. Papke: Debbie? Larson: I don't have any questions. Papke: I'm still a little unclear, if MnDOT doesn't grant you the right to put the storm water into the 212 right-of-way, and you need to dump that into Bluff Creek, does that change the design of the NURP pond or can you comment on the storm water management? Dan Parks: I can address that. Dan Parks with Westwood. This site drains about 20 acres presently. The plan shows about 20 acres draining down to this pond here on Outlot B. There's about 2 acres that presently drain out to the highway. When they are designing and constructing the highway they are providing a culvert to drain some of the existing area in this area. Typically when I do a drainage plan we try to balance the site to allow the drainage that's allowed by MnDOT's drainage and then take the rest of the water on the site. We presently have a catch basin here and a catch basin here that drains out to the pipe in the highway. It, to give some scope. I think the existing drain is like 1.2 cubic fee per second and our plan was calling for like 1.7 cubic feet per second and that, it may be Greek to you but it's not a very big pipe. It's an 8 inch pipe or something along that lines. Sometimes when you work with MnDOT they do give us some of the availability and provisions for a little bit of a change in the numbers but we don't always know that until we get the final permit so we've done something we think is consistent with their original design. If MnDOT comes back and says it's too much water, for example if they allow 1.2 and we are preparing, proposing 1.7, we will simply take this catch basin lead and take it to the pond and perhaps leave this catch basin lead into the highway department so in terms of the grand scale things, we're talking probably changing maybe a half to I acre of land from the highway department to take it to the pond. And the pond would then be incrementally sized a little bit larger. The city staff and the city's requirements and the watershed's requirements frankly are that the site not increase discharges after we're done from what happens now so even though we have more hard surface, the pond, the bathtub is being designed in such a way that to slow that water down and discharge it at rates that are acceptable and velocities that are acceptable at the outlet of the pond. So if MnDOT says no, you can't do that. It's a fairly minor shift of the plan. It doesn't change the parking lot. It doesn't change the site at all. It just changes one pipe that will no longer becoming probably about this big of an area of the parking lot will now drain to this pond. Again this is probably half an acre, two- thirds of an acre that would now go to the pond rather than out to the highway department so of the 20 acre site project I think it's pretty small of a detail. Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 Papke: There was a question that came up before. This area is notorious for bad soils. I mean all of southern Chanhassen drains to the bottom of Powers Boulevard down here, and are you, have the calculations been done that really show that the NURP pond that's being put in there will indeed absorb the water that. Bill Katter: Well the NURP ponds are typically, generally based upon the type of soils that we find in the bottom, they may infiltrate out the bottom. The ponds are typically designed to provide storage, debt storage so the water stays in there for a certain period of time. We're highly confident that the pond is going to work. There's not going to be a problem with it. If there is a problem with the soil stability we can either use materials to add or clay or do up mixtures to make sure the pond is stable. We don't expect any site sloping problems. The pond's going to be at a 3 to 1 or flatter slope. We don't expect that to be a problem. There's also a question here about the retaining wall and the drainage, Commissioner Laufenburger mentioned it. There's about 6 or 7 acres up in this area that drain presently in kind of a shallow swale drains to the property. We are providing provisions for a storm sewer pipe that would run around the east side of the site and then dump that water back in the ditch, not running that through this pond because it's generally clean water. It's not being corrupted by parking lot drainage or drippings off of cars. There was a comment in the staff report about making sure that we have the pipe adequately sized and perhaps have an overflow structure in case we have a larger than anticipated storm event, so we'll probably have in this area, we'll have a normal pipe that will take the water, and then we'll have a stand pipe at some elevation that's a little higher in case the water is exceeding the design storm. We may also look too quite frankly at an opportunity maybe to redirect some of that water into this wetland rather than having it all come through, but again staff is very confident. You've got a very good engineering staff on board that will help make those decisions and entirely confident the project will work from a drainage perspective. There was a comment earlier about the retaining wall as well. You know we will design a wall that will try to keep the moisture away from it. We always try to make sure there's no water pressures against the wall because that's what's going to collapse the wall. If there's a need for more of a structural integrity wall than a block wall, the materials have not yet been decided yet but if we need to do something that's more of a poured concrete wall or something along that nature that also provides really unlimited ability to resist any tipping from any water pressures or soil pressures that might be exerted. The comments on soils though, based upon the results of the soil borings, the soil boring capacities, if soil is needed to be dug out, built you know, compacted placed and new soils brought in, that will all be done as part of the structural design for the foundation and based upon the type of soils, usually what happens is it just changes the size of the spread footing so if there's really good soils the footings might be this big. If the soil's a little worst, it might be this big but that's all taken into account with the building structural footing design. Papke: One last question. Are we too early in the process to be worried about lighting and impact of light pollution? This is an area of the city that historically has very dark skies. Aanenson: No, I think this is the place where we do want to talk about that. That comes kind of back to what we talk about the siting of the building. What was the best way to provide noise attenuation. Lighting. This building in itself is going to provide a buffer to residential behind is one of the reasons why we did support the larger, even with the parking ramp, that will also PM Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 provide noise attenuation for the ramp. But the parking lot lighting, because it's going to be commercial, or office excuse me across the street, so the parking lot should be shining that way. There will be some over spill and we do have the light standards as far as looking at the photometrics so we believe we should accomplish that by siting of this building, but that was one of the reasons why we spent a lot of time trying to figure out what is the best footprint to make it compatible with the neighborhood. And we looked at the elevations, that was one of the reasons I think walking out there helps too with the change in grade from the existing houses to make sure we don't get that spill so hopefully they're looking over the top, but you're right. It's going to change. It's going to change with some spill in light. Papke: Any other questions for the applicant? If not thank you very much. Appreciate it. Okay at this point we'd like to open up the public hearing for the public, if someone would like to step up to the podium and ask their questions or make their comments, we'd love to hear them. Kevin Ellsworth: Good evening Mr. Chair, commissioners. Kevin Ellsworth, 9601 Flintlock Trail. We're on the far right of Pioneer Hills. In that one triangle lot. Yep, right up there. And we've owned that property since 1985 and built in 191 and Mr. Erhart's been an amazing neighbor and has great stewardship of the land, and that's clearly illustrated in this work that the staff and the developer's put together and so often folks come to these meetings in protest of the development. I'm not here for that. I'm here to say that this looks like a really good plan and a really good project. The neighbors may disagree with me, some of them but when that development was proposed and put together, it didn't take much study to know that 212 was coming through nearby and knew that that infrastructure was there and that someday that would be developed with some sort of commercial property. And indeed with that kind of an infrastructure investment by the State, the City, the County, certainly putting something like that. This proposed development's a great idea and brings jobs to the neighborhood and brings good tax base to the city and the county so. And again with the way the conservation easements are laid out, it preserves much of that property that is just gorgeous back there. I think most of us have been back there and connects it to the nice parkland that the city did acquire so again that's, I can only say good things about it and I really appreciate your concern about the runoff into the creek too. That's most excellent so thank you. Papke: Thank you for your comments. Anyone else? I'm just another neighbor out there and I live at 1050 Homestead Lane. I live on the cul-de-sac next one over. Papke: And your name sir. Johnnie Meyering: Johnnie Meyering, and it, I've been going through it with the neighbors and everything and it is a nice development. But I have just a couple concerns that maybe you can verify. I waslistening to you and he said it went from a 2 story, it might go to a 5 story. Is there anything down the line in the future that it will go higher? Bill Katter: Let me address that. No. i Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 Johnnie Meyering: No? Bill Katter: We will, the approval if it's granted will limit it to a maximum of 4 heights if it's one building or 3 heights if it's two structures. Kate correct me if I'm wrong. Aanenson: That's correct and with the variances that would limit too. If it was to change from that it would have to come back through a public hearing process to change that. Johnnie Meyering: Okay. And then one other question is, since MnDOT put 212 in, I don't know Kurt lives out there and some other people out there but some of us out there since 212 come in, as soon as they started driving the pilings for the bridges, I don't know what this one's going to have, if it's going to have pilings or it's just going to be on the ground, but I have been having problems with the aquifer of everybody pounding and it's stirring up the aquifer and I've been having to put a new well in all the time. A new pump in. Not drill a new well but a new pump in. Fixing it because it's filling up and getting really bad water. We used to have really good water, then it started getting worse and worse and I was just wondering if it was going to be pilings again or if we cannot worry about that because I just fixed it and we're starting to get, starting to get better water again and we're just worried about it. Wondering about that. Bill Katter: The relatively short answer is, we haven't done in-depth soil borings but based on preliminary we don't believe pilings is what we'll end up doing. We'll do some soil correction but that will be dig out and replace it. It won't be pilings. Johnnie Meyering: Well that would really help. Bill Katter: Just a rule of thumb in our business, whenever you have this many oak trees on a site it typically means sandy soils. Oak trees hate clay. They can't stand water constantly on their roots so that's a good indication for the soils on the site. Johnnie Meyering: Okay. And it does look like a nice place for a building there and that's the only two questions I had. Thank you. Papke: Thank you sir. Anyone else? Okay, seeing none. I close the public hearing and bring it back to the Planning Commission for deliberation and we'll start with Mark. Undestad: You know what, I mean I really don't have a lot to talk about. I think it was, I know a lot of work has gone into it to this point and even a lot of the trips we've had out there to kind of see how things were going along, so no. I think it's a very well put together. Staffs done an excellent job at some of the negotiating and mitigating out there so I like it. Papke: Okay. Kathleen. Thomas: I like it too. I think it's really well put together. I think that it will be a good focal point for Chanhassen. It's just something, if it winds up being a medical building I think that will be incredibly awesome and wonderful for the community so I think it's a really great thing. 31 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 Larson: ... issues regarding the water... I think it will be a great asset to the city. Laufenburger: Acknowledge a lot of work has been done already but I think that I'm confident about this because I think that our city staff is in a position to work with the developer to insure that some of those things that are perhaps unclear right now because we can't be sure about them, that the environment will be protected. It will be built appropriately and I'm confident not only in the builder and the applicant and the owner but I'm more confident in our city being able to do the job to insure that they follow all the guidelines that are necessary. So I know that puts a big burden on you Alyson and Bob and Kate but what better place for that burden to be so I support it. Dillon: Just to kind of reiterate what everyone said. It appears to have been a great collaboration and partnership between the staff and the developer and they considered you know some potential areas of watch out and contingencies there. They seem to have been thought through quite well. I believe it will be good for our community. It was a very professional presentation and so I'm in favor of the project moving ahead. Papke: Okay, thank you Kevin. Yeah, kudos to both the developer and city staff. This is the most complex development proposal we've had, even considering the down turn in the economy for a number of years here and I'm impressed that given all the challenges here, particularly in regards to the impact on the Bluff Creek Overlay District and the environmental sensitivity of the site and the uncertainty with the tenant and so on, I think the developer and city staff have done a commendable job in pulling this together. As we've gone through this we've come up with very few gotch ya's out of this whole thing and I think this one will, is extremely clean and hats off to everyone for a process and I appreciate the public comments as well. I think those were very good. Okay, with that I think we're ready for a motion. If someone would like to take a stab a this monumental motion. Undestad: I'll make a motion. Just a few pages in there. Ahight, let's make a motion that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1 at this time Butternut Ridge 1't Addition from Agricultural Estate District, A2 to Office and Industrial, OI. B. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit with variances to encroach in the primary zone and required buffer for the development in the Bluff Creek corridor, subject to conditions 1 through 10. C. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Subdivision Preliminary Plat creating one lot, two outlots and the dedication of public right-of- way, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services dated April 1, 2009, subject to conditions 1 through 45. And D. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Site Plan with Variances for building height and Bluff Creek primary zone setbacks for Planning Case 08-16 for a two -phased, three story, 160,000 square footage professional office building and up to a 731 stall, five level parking ramp on Lot 1, Block 1 of the development, plans prepared by Pope Associates, Inc and Westwood Professional Services Inc dated April 1, 2009, subject to conditions I through 28. And E. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve a sign size variance request to permit an eight foot tall sign and up to 64 square feet of sign display area subject to conditions I through 5. 32 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 Papke: Very good. Is there a second? Larson: I'll second it. Papke: Any friendly amendments? If not, let's have a vote. Undestad moved, Larson seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approves the Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1, Butternut Ridge First Addition, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional District, OI. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Undestad moved, Larson seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit with Variances to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; subject to the following conditions: 1. The property line may be revised to incorporate the reconveyed property from MnDOT to the developer. 2. The developer shall meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines (MSBG). 3. To mitigate for the effects of development within the primary corridor, the developer should be required to meet green construction standards for the whole site. 4. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. 5. Evaluate other site designs, stormwater management techniques and low -impact development practices for their benefit in reducing impacts to the primary and secondary zones of the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 6. Reforest those areas disturbed to grade the site but do not have structures on them. The reforestation should be done with deciduous tree species representative of the existing species composition. The forested areas are dominated by bur oak. 7. Maintain the natural drainage patterns. 8. The applicant must clearly illustrate how impacts to the primary zone are to be mitigated. This mitigation must consider all benefits derived from the primary zone as described in Article XXXI of the Chanhassen City Code. 33 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 9. The area east of Lot I within Outlot A within the primary corridor of Bluff Creek shall be covered by a conservation easement. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. Any wetland mitigation activities that are required within this area shall have final approval by City staff. No additional activities shall be allowed within this area and access to the mitigation site shall be the existing path. 10. The wooded areas of Lot 1 and Outlot B within the Bluff Creek primary zone shall be covered by a conservation easement that restricts specific activities and prohibits any further development within the area." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Undestad moved, Larson seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approves the Subdivision Preliminary Plat creating one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-of-way, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to the following conditions: 1. Revise the Plat name to Butternut Ridge First Addition. 2. The developer shall either dedicate/donate an Outlot or record a conservation easement containing the Bluff Creek Primary zone north of the road right-of-way in Outlot A. A conservation easement shall be recorded over the Bluff Creek Primary zone located within Lot 1 and Outlot B. This easement shall restrict activities within the area and prohibit any development. The City shall have final approval of the easement restrictions. The easement shall be recorded with the first phase of the development. 3. Submit proposed names for street labeled "Access Road" on plans for approval. 4. The drainage report and plans must be revised to address comments from MnDOT. 5. The applicant must obtain a MnDOT drainage permit. 6. The drainage report and plans must be modified so that the peak discharge rate to the off -site wetland does not increase under fully developed conditions. 7. The plans must be revised to provide either an overland emergency overflow or an additional outlet control structure at a higher elevation. 8. The developer must submit a letter from an engineer stating that the retaining wall east of the building can accommodate temporary ponding behind the wall. 9. The alignment of the bypass storm sewer pipe must be redesigned to eliminate excess cover over the pipe. 34 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 10. If MnDOT allows a connection to the Highway 212 storm pipe, then show the existing pipe on the plan sheets. 11. Building permits are required for retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 12. A manhole must be installed at the terminus of the sanitary sewer. 13. All sanitary sewer and watermain within Lot 1, Block I shall be privately owned and maintained. 14. The storm sewer that will convey runoff from the drainageway to the east of the property shall also be privately owned and maintained, including those portions that lie within public right-of-way and the City owned outlot. 15. The 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement shown on the preliminary plat over this storm sewer must be deleted. 16. Delete the 20-foot wide drainage and utility easement for the future watermain. 17. Provide a temporary blanket drainage and utility easement over the proposed forcemain corridor. 18. A permanent 20-foot wide easement will be required over the final forcemain alignment. 19. Each new lot will be subject to the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. These fees will be collected with the building permit, subject to the rates in effect at the time of building permit, and shall be based on the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' SAC unit determination. 20. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 21. All public utility improvements will require a preconstruction meeting before building permit issuance. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required, including the MPCA, Department of Health, Carver County and Watershed District. 22. Upon project completion as -built drawings must be submitted for the private utilities. 23. The double left turn lane on southbound Powers Boulevard must be constructed with Phase I improvements. 35 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 24. The developer must coordinate the construction of the double left turn lane with Carver County and provide additional right-of-way, if needed. 25. The developer must pay a cash fee with the final plat to cover the cost of the traffic signal. 26. A temporary roadway, drainage and utility easement must be provided over the cul-de-sac at the east end of the access road. 27. This property is subject to the Arterial Collector Fee which is $3,600 per developable acre. The acreage used in this calculation shall include the right-of-way tumback from both Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. This fee shall be paid in cash with the final plat 28. The RIM and Flowage Easements need to be indicated on the plat. This should include the document number 10-05-87-1. 29. The wetland mitigation area in Outlot A needs to be created. A Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants needs to be executed and recorded with Carver County. This document number needs to be included on the plat. 30. The remaining conditions of approval for WAP #2006-32 need to be met: a. The plans shall be revised to show how M-1 will be accessed. The access route shall be stable, shall avoid damage to significant trees (greater than 10" DBH) and shall avoid impacts to natural dramageways and any jurisdictional wetlands that may exist on site that were not delineated by Westwood Professional Services in August 2006. b. A planting plan for M-1, including invasive vegetation management techniques, species to be planted, proposed planting rates, and the approach to upland buffer restoration, shall be submitted prior to final City Council approval. c. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit equal to 110% of the cost of the wetland creation (including grading and seeding) to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland are met. The letter of credit shall be effective for no less than five years from the date of final plat approval. The applicant shall submit a cost estimate for wetland creation (including grading and seeding) so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of credit. d. A five-year wetland replacement monitoring plan shall be submitted. The replacement monitoring plan shall include a detailed management plan for invasive non-native species, particularly hybrid cattail, purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. The plans shall show fixed photo monitoring points for the replacement wetland. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. 36 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 31. The legal wetland boundary of the RIM wetland was not delineated in the Westwood Wetland Delineation Report dated August of 2006. This boundary must be delineated and wetland impacts avoided where possible. 32. Because of the perpetual RIM and flowage easements the plans must be provided to the Natural Resources Conservation Service for review and comment. Any comments from the NRCS must be made available to the City. 33; Drainage to the RIM wetland from the south flows through a defined swale. The conveyance of this flow must be maintained under the proposed road extension. 34. Erosion Control plan needs to be updated per the July comments: a. Show a 75-foot rock construction entrance. b. Show rounding of corners for proposed grades. c. Erosion control blanket shall be shown on all slopes east of the proposed building and adjacent to the pond. d. An NPDES permit must be obtained prior to any site grading and a SWPPP must be provided to the City for review and comment. e. Replace MnDOT 340 mix with a modified BWSR U7 seed mix. 35. Estimated SWMP fees due at the time of final plat are $271,506.20. 36. The development must comply with Carver Soil and Water Conservation District comments. 37. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. 38. The following practices are required in order to insure the best chance of survival for the highlighted oaks to be preserved along the east side of the development: a. Understory trees near the oaks shall be preserved. b. Roots at the grading limits shall be cut cleanly with a trencher or vibratory plow. c. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed prior to any grading. d. Trees shall be thoroughly watered during dry periods. 39. The applicant shall install a second tier to the retaining wall at the north end of the east side of the development to preserve the grade surrounding the oaks proposed to be saved. 40. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall be in place and maintained until all construction is completed. 41. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans, dated 10/06/08, will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 37 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 42. All trees removed shall be chipped or hauled off site. No burning permits shall be issued. 43. The developer shall pay the full park dedication fee in force at the time of final plat approval and prior to recording. 44. Construction of the 10-ft. wide bituminous access road trail and the North Trail. The North Trail plans shall be modified dedicating a permanent 20-foot wide trail easement to allow for appropriate separation from adjoining improvements and boulevard areas for winter plowing, snow storage and aesthetics. 45. Dedication of a permanent triangular shaped trail easement at the South East corner of Lot 1, Block 1. The triangle shall be 50' in length on its South side and 200' in length on its East side." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Undestad moved, Larson seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approves the Site Plan with Variances for building height and Bluff Creek Primary Zone setbacks for Planning Case #08-16, for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot professional office building, and up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp on Lot 1, Block 1 of the development, plans prepared by Pope Associates, Inc. and Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated April 1, 2009, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final plat for the development shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The full buildout is predicated upon a tumback to the land owner of MnDOT right-of-way. In the event that this turnback does not occur, the applicant may build a four-story building totaling 112,000 square feet subject to parking compliance with City Code. 3. The developer shall meet design and construction standards that would lead to, at a minimum, certification by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System by the U.S. Green Building Council, or comply with the Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines, MSBG. 4. The developer shall continue the architectural detailing through the use of the three brick colors as well as the use of stone and metal on the garage structure. 5. The developer shall provide secure bicycle racks and/or storage (within 200 yards of a building entrance) for 5% or more of all building users (measured at peak periods), and provide shower and changing facilities in the building. The developer should also provide benches throughout the site as well as tables and chairs in the patio area. 6. The light fixtures shall be revised to high-pressure sodium lighting. W Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 7. The buildings are required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 8. The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 9. Accessible routes must be provided between commercial building(s), parking facilities and public transportation stops. 10. All parking areas, including parking structure, must be provided with accessible parking. 11. The developer shall comply with the minimum parking setback requirement and install appropriate berming and or landscaping to allow the 10 feet setback. 12. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 13. All openings created in the wooded areas on the east and south sides of the development shall be reforested with native tree species. Planting stock sizes may be variable. Species selected must be from the Bluff Creek Management Plan native plant list. These areas shall not be mowed or managed as turf areas. 14. The applicant shall install a second tier to the retaining wall at the north end of the east side of the development to preserve the grade surrounding the oaks proposed to be saved. 15. The applicant does not meet required landscape quantities for parking lot trees and islands/peninsulas in both phases. The applicant must meet minimum requirements for parking lot trees and landscape islands/peninsulas. 16. Phase I: The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for either of the bufferyard areas. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to meet minimum requirements. 17. Phase II: The applicant does not meet the minimum requirements for bufferyard areas. The applicant shall increase the plantings to meet minimum requirements. 18. The applicant must replace the Colorado spruce with other approved species in the plant schedule. 19. All transplanted materials must be pre -approved by the City. Transplanted trees will not be accepted if substituted without City approval. If approved for transplanting, the material must be warranted for a minimum of one year. If transplanted materials die, they must be replaced with nursery stock. 20. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. Fencing shall be in place and maintained until all construction is completed. 39 Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 21. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans, dated 04/O1/09, will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 22. All trees removed shall be chipped or hauled off site. No burning permits shall be issued. 23. The North Trail plans or parking lot design shall be modified to allow for appropriate boulevard areas for winter plowing, snow storage and aesthetics. 24. A 3-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, and nothing shall be placed in front of the hydrant outlets, connections, fire protection control valves that would interfere with fire fighter operations. Section 508.5 MN. Fire Code and Sec. 508.5.4. 25. No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must be removed or chipped on site. 26. Contact the Chanhassen Fire Marshal for locations of "No Parking Fire Lane" signage, and locations of curbing to be painted yellow. MN Fire Code Sec. 503.3. 27. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. MSFC sec 501.4. 28. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. MSFC See.503.2.3." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Undestad moved, Larson seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approves a sign size Variance request to permit an eight (8) foot tall sign with up to 64 square feet of sign display area, subject to the following conditions: 1. Separate sign permits shall be required for each sign. 2. The development name in the monument sign shall be individual dimensioned letters with a minimum %-inch projection. 3. Only one monument sign shall be permitted for the Powers Crossing Professional Center site. 4. The sign height for the directional signs shall be reduced to five feet. The display area for sign #2 shall be reduced to four square feet. 5. The sign location shall meet all setback and site triangle requirements." m Planning Commission Meeting - May 5, 2009 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Thomas noted the verbatim and summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated April 21, 2009 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS: None. Chairman Papke adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 9:05 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim FF dcl -Olo CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO.09-06 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, May 5, 2009, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for a Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; Subdivision into one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-of-way; Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Office/Institutional (OT), Site Plan Review with Variances for a two- phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot medical center, up to a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp and signage on property located on Outlot A, Butternut Ridge (southeast corner of Powers Boulevard and Highway 312) — POWERS CROSSING PROFESSIONAL CENTER. Applicant: United Properties, LLC/Timothy & Dawne Erhart. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.ustsery/nlan/09-06.htm1 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, Senior Planner Email: benerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on April 23, 2009) SCANNED Powers Crossings Medical Center • Outline project, phasing, potential uses (medical/professional or office) , importance of project to new freeway, concentration of density along highway corridor • Relationship of building to site, placement of building • Introduce architect and engineer for project Discussion Points • Bluff Creek Overlay District — establishment of line, City determination vs. Westwood's independent engineer opinion; substantial differences of opinion. City staff recommends requested variance in return for 'green development' approach, which is ok with UP subject to clearly stated condition of meeting equivalent design for 2008 USGBC LEED Core and Shell Certification. City is also receiving conservation easement from landowner as additional consideration for this variance • Landowner has gone to great lengths to protect and preserve quality trees on site with idea of replanting these trees on site upon development • Proposed plat name of Butternut Ridge feels residential and we would propose Powers Crossing First Addition • Drainage and utility comments are ok and we believe we will meet specified conditions by working with staff • Alignment of future road to East was completed with considerable staff input and we will revisit this alignment to minimize impacts to the nearby wetland • On Page 22 of the staff report, the available SWMP credit is not reflected in the total due to the City, please correct for the record assuming we build the pond as opposed to an alternative form of stormwater retention • We have proposed a retaining wall around the rear of the pond to minimize intrusion into woods here; pond provides capacity for fully developed site and portion of new interior roadway. Underground pipe will be evaluated but not our preference • The City requested a blanket drainage and utility easement for the new stormwater interceptor line; we need to work with staff to identify the actual easement location since we have spent considerable dollars designing and engineering the site and do not want to have to resubmit plans • Traffic issues o Addition of second left turn lane inbound to the site was not required by MNDOT or the County's review, nor mentioned by staff until this report; unsure why this condition is needed since our traffic study suggests it is not needed. We would suggest if needed a lengthening of the one inbound turn lane in order to avoid widening the interior frontage road Traffic signal cost paid in cash at final plat is not reasonable. The traffic study we completed indicated this may or may not be triggered depending upon future traffic counts and uses of property. Additionally, not reasonable for this development to carry this entire cost when other parcels benefit including parcel to the West zoned for office use also, which if developed ahead of our Phase 2 project, should pay for the signal as the triggering project instead. The reasonable method for dealing with this would be an assessment to benefitting property owners when it is needed. We would like condition restated to indicate developer will be required to provide an updated traffic study before Phase 2 can proceed and evaluate cost sharing of any required traffic signal at that time • Report indicates we do not meet certain landscaping requirements: c Tree count is below requirement, due to lack of areas to place the trees Some reduction could be warranted based on conservation easement and protection of significant trees in that area o Boulevard trees are shown at 50 feet on center, to promote full growth. Can reduce to 30 feet on center to place more trees, but will reduce visibility of project and may affect long term growth of trees o Reluctant to aggressively reforest area East of building as it may affect remaining tree roots and long term health o Recommend we work with staff to create final landscaping plan with an eye to what makes sense for this site, not technical ordinance requirements Dan Parks From: Bill Katter [bill.katter@uproperties.com] Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 9:53 AM To: Dan Parks Subject: RE: chanhassen Ps as pertains to Inverwood...... From: Bill Katter Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 9:52 AM To: 'Dan Parks' Subject: RE: chanhassen Ps I need a contract for your work out here. I think the mass grading and other work you performed may have been outside of the scope that Pope hired you for under their contract, so we need to put this together between us. From: Dan Parks [ma ilto: Dan. Parks@westwoodps.com] Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 9:40 AM To: Bill Katter Subject: RE: chanhassen 10-4 dan From: Bill Katter [mailto:bill.katter@uproperties.com] Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 9:37 AM To: Dan Parks Cc: Paul A. Holmes Subject: RE: chanhassen It was mailed to me, so I don't have an email I can forward. I am sure it is available on their website, however...... From: Dan Parks [mailto:Dan. Parks@westwoodps.com] Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 9:35 AM To: Bill Katter Cc: Paul A. Holmes Subject: chanhassen Were you going to send the original PC report (with color maps etc) - or can we get it at the city link?? dan 1 Location Map (Subject Property Highlighted in Yellow) Powers Crossing Professional Center Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition Planning Case 2009-06 SCANNED CITYOF C9ANAbSSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone, 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952,227,1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Pull is Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227,1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 web site www.d.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM% TO: Jerry Mohn, Building Official Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Specialist Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer FROM: Robert Generous, Senior Planner DATE: April 2, 2009 SUBJ: Powers Crossing Professional Center Plan Review Planning Case 08-16 Attached for your review is the resubmitted plan set for Powers Crossing Professional Center (formerly known as Fairview Chanhassen Medical Center). The applicant has indicated that only the name of the project has changed; however, could you please review the attached plans to confirm that there are no other changes from your previous review. This item is scheduled to go before the Planning Commission on May 5, 2009. Please have any new comments to me no later than April 24, 4009. gAplan\2008 planning cases\08-16 fairview chanhassen medical centerVeview memo 4-2-09.doc Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Aanenson, Kate From: Bill Katter [bill.katter@uproperties.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:49 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Powers Crossing Hi Kate, one last question, the staff report did not appear to update our agreement on plantings within the MNDOT ROW, ie the developer would be allowed some period of time to meet Phase I tree requirements such that we have an opportunity to obtain the MNDOT and County ROWs before planting trees, so that we don't have to relocate them. I think it actually boils down to Powers Boulevard plantings. Can you make mention of this tonight, such that it will be incorporated into a development agreement at time of final plat, in the event we do not have the ROW worked out yet? William P. Katter Sr. Vice President Investments / Development UNITED OTh- ropertiesxom 3500 American Blvd W - #200 Minneapolis, MN 55431 95283785251 Phone 952 835 8870 1 Fax 612 270 9137 1 Cell bill.katter 0 uproeerties.com -------------------------------- Please consider the environment before printing this message 5/26/2009 P0 T6NIIAI A/-\i, IICI..v ' I "OI" OFFICE AND INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT SUMMARY OF REQUEST POWERS CROSSING PROFESSIONAL CENTER Rezoning from Agriculnual Estate District, A2, to Once & Institutional, Ol; Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor, Subdivision into one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-o&way; Site Plan with Variances for a two-phase, duce -story, 160,000 square -foot professional office center, and a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp; and Signage Variance. I 5/26/2009 SUBDIVISION PHASE I SITE PLAN PARKING RAW PHASE I SITE PLAN PARKING RAW 5/26/2009 SIGN VARIANCE Y4rtvlYlprt. ma.w irwYs� (� MONUMENT SIGN Powers Crossing Professional Office SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting the following: • Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; • Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Office & Institutional, OI; • Subdivision into one lot, two outlots and dedication of public right-of-way; • Site Plan Review with Variances for a two-phase, three-story, 160,000 square -foot medical center, and a 731-stall, five -level parking ramp, and signage. Issues: • The background, vision and rules governing and the impact of the proposed development on the Bluff Creek corridor, including the location of the building, the encroachment into the primary zone, and any necessary or appropriate mitigation, which will be reviewed in the conditional use permit discussion. The impacts of the development on infrastructure, especially traffic, which is reviewed as part of the subdivision and site plan. The traffic study completed for the site indicates that a double left turn lane is required for southbound Powers Boulevard into the site. This turn lane must be constructed with Phase I improvements. The developer must coordinate this work with Carver County and provide additional right-of-way, if needed. The traffic study also indicates that the intersection at Powers Boulevard will likely warrant a traffic signal when the second building phase is constructed. Bluff Creek Over I ay District eeew WadanElnvanbry C00.0.1DOR �w �Mney1 e.wnew Mon.wz liryelrtl SMeme ._.. M.nq.l Inryrq_laye 11n�eQUW BCO IaN Future Trails �.r Existing Trails Trail Map October 14, 2008 ---• 1 11 \\ \\� I g 1 r /` MI^LAY IIxE 1 ` \ \ \.`,, / • _ ••• - \ \\\ ��.� \ Aar LER \ \ � �.\� a'• / ^ '� '�. _ -. \ _ +J IIt \ w1 bxExuY xE aCIX =—�aq \ \ �rsp pr rta a rx � Afr[^sximll ik�lEYrii \ \ �\h " a11E1GNi fEV �..� \Y\� MMfiNN a ql ^ulrvi^e QD NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ZONE H70flBR O6 U7 OB I i � EiORIFR SfAt CIE CALL I r w rr.. isaaanZ I I I I 1 1 I i m^sroo srua I I re - AJfrr J rc I I I _O°1 a- weary I----+ J a-3auzr46 /--- I h.E I i- znse I 21 �• � ~ ly atm_ar n I I , �-+ram°'' I � "� it � I , � It % / \,_ /i 'w�i¢u �__�• y I I , a- razoR i g / SOI°I1' 74 raaw'�.,, l a� � p 0 � ,r.CFiiJI M6n•JI J14 su E '/ �l \��\ i I I I I 1 I ♦ a• anac aaur 1 am guE ET % ' I--------- r l l \ °r R- \ -fir ) rsmvv &yW Develop—t summer) O .e e. m.i ... m vonvs rnom.c amzmo.,u mvrw. amo'vs&n .arn � r. �uw�mv . a..w m e aers..mr -� :,o., `, :s'""i m w: �,wwe m� r .,. ww.a r. aw r.�.. a r a �. ® .� •vo„ . �u�...... �a ro � mpa ror � .y„^aM°wi°p _a vav�aq � '� ~ � r.cs as ® �� ••n' ® a rw� B ® p V®®s m`Tin,.av� 4 x�w.vrr _� ,ram NOT FOR CONMUCRON 6➢ rwrr m,an a ¢ rrr. w. . GMeM1, M ummm, Eer> .rc[ Aaowv¢ Irc Scraw a.uu.m r. Frw, MMf.wn�r. �vu;a�m op UXIiEO PROPERiIfS Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 la.l PRELIMINARY PLAT 541 C2 �_, r I%'WW O • mao.a Q ,. w R �� mmc+ . m • ®.raq. r.. • .v w... RI .e ®ev -�mearc • r..ra �.,.-ea..vu. • ne.�o a �r.er . o..r w. u.....n sa • ....r RR ..o.ar o..n.... la..... r..a e n.... s.Mw....r GO r w.OW w COPIER - STATE pE fJAl arra F— IRM RVVE%TMY I EI a dpdm L 1 A H. M/I .bpi 4✓DIu4 ®aM Y M.ma1 Gma.l Ndo [ney .e.��s nv.�w. r.wa.e q .ox s.aw mme zf.�M CYr FOR C�ON Pa[Assoo+i[s l.�c FMvw.PMaD ST.PMA.MM.- IEITEE PROPERTIES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 EMSTING COMMONS & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY \ A1IR� _V P r11W��, ■ice-.�V�1 fit G b xwn w• aPY4 oPl[x STATE aEx c�u ia. my xm ml-vs.-mve / \ Grading Nola 111 �v ,mw,vrs uT LLcvnnGs n Lns,xL ImaG.mY no uvKs As / � sow w T.z PL.w Aa wwow.rz cFN.cWP wu rELT Vw. srt mEioxs ua ufury LEAiore: mox m TuwvAnw/caalwa-�ro. M xCIRII 9V1L E xollid YEAAht. R Mn YH/IEPMLi3 ME taro. aLIRIMZ LOGIg6 ND LWC, LmAl�S6 M[®L 6 LLVbW3 1 .LL fMGV.MN 9W1 E N 10.VIxM11£ YM M WNOIT f➢IIINI E YIxOMO 9YGbIgILY Id iT101 FMLAV/.MI MY BW[L/aV6I6 ASMAIIYf AS AV.IF➢ F M OIY FlOm6 ASbn.101 E IIx®IA A 4L 06TIf➢ YPM£➢ xF/S xE m IE9'.E iNM Nn6 6 NS(6 .VO 9➢ nl EDt. M3 xGS 91x1 E Ylpm 1Ml .1FMMY SixO 6 GN4 6 YFYm. $ IMOY.V[ MMI N NMi MY ma E]i.OBPM. 6 M 01A/LM 9LY1 E IfSxl®E NI PPPYN /M] ,Na,iYxR w.Vre raipE EVES sol a arwr.�aLe aYPYIe soK oEsxaNL sw1 MEEII No ,IPlls m Lu,xY M IOOdi E pNia: wux IFL44MY RIIDOLL E M4 EVES 91p1 E NTpLm F M uEEu PWa m Mmon. KMC mTTa EVm svu mewl ut _ m IAMpAY NMi SINONOS t � / / ' 0. .Y19.1RS 9WL E Y1.®W Sl E1 Mi1FR UI[� OTIxIE �Wf IFO EI 116 9FET. >. @1NKIn1 9WL WO[L. wIII MLIS NIIw IYIS E iKNI' MO t _ {PONE A 91]OM f1IBm 9A,'.E pM ViOIY 9R6 E,EOI PON3 \ YIIE ELEV/.IIN6 NE 9VIx1 d ETEOI 9A1 W161.ID aE1MG 6 90i FIEVATn15 9pN11E1'.,K fMxm PA\EDIT fl[Ylg6 [ QIi1FA y` nw LN[ wam oMnvE xoim. Piorosn Lunaxs .E m rVnm -+Y_ _ \ 2 4E EOESINUL EP.Ai ld PAWIM TNiiFS43 MO MD OOIWS � \ \ � m O,IM/LiM 9VLL ObV3 6 .xY 624 SE W,FEY BNT EIER _ _ \ \ MILT K 9E QWIC NO UlYl1T [VISMRIInI 6 mNEIIIl M MTpACipl 9WL OEVaE E NL f]R4 !E Y.1WY x A 1WPE11 r \ \ \\ I®ryOFW M ONEII x0 M I®MM II915S \\ � ,,. mIAPIW 9WL TO,w /. SrtnKTINM ETwC wt E901 D1,,.m F . IAI® PPa£IDarN pIOQ1L � \ \ \ `\ � K :u Ln¢ITucnol swv [aYwY m Emu. s,.rt ND Lmau Nils \ \ � \ � .nuo.o M WIW4 wuiwr v60lrNE aTwAiu sYzm (xPo¢) \ � EWi KQYmdR \ \ � � \ n PKA ro N.ma,i a .xr sKVeva a PAplmli.. PTOE YEL .i \ \ . , WLiI Yl E EOIRO EI M 4WANE. MC61WlN SIL.1LL E KlOR9m F WALK. WEY 6 t MN[lE PAffi pM IElT-INFO TNCMAl3E EV MNi. LR NWDpO FEW. x E.NI a \ l PWNCKYM EELMIS ML pIXP 9RO1'®NL NO E[CN! m � \ \\ \ o'PcwW�iE�isa�ws"oaaatV�i�i'[ue sxu E \ \ \ \ fA OflwlxNi W,WK NI® EIFAM 9..NKt MO SRFLf n1 PMWF / \ \ M(A4 9WL E LMKIDI N 16WIIIE'FM M 9tad Ex9}. \ \ \\ \ Em o� �x rmL zimsl wo x Eamars m M M8 \\ IS 4YMxW11 W1FWL,gi AI®xMNMLW PM SMBM \ \ PAIO)ti xFA 9WL E (OiILIFU N MWPYE Fill EW4ExIS E M EaL1.MY COP/.CM111f111fO A4 OlaAm x WDJI SIm.Ft / � _ _ K x191S xO W W W5 1F5.VA 9RWFRO F .VI MEPU1.EllI EORCINLM rMJlfll dJN.➢IN lG M PM09' 6 IdONL n6TME lP U5Vi18F SE.S 94LL E 0P1FIm .S IEP1E0 F M EO1EnPKKJ1 pMLI M WITI/.CM 9WL E E4(M9F iG \ � — _ faWxU1MC NL IiGYW SE.S 1mR IJO Ll4ECINNS NW M - — \ ®IEMILY LIIEEOL P F.�LLsc� r�PuuD Si. PApP Maee.a.se�v I.. -- UNITED PRNPERIIES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 Control NOW 'S�`' �.�•,•-._'� — — ,. Er roLE a. E Lar.um rmao sa x ru ru rEAs xo � LOGI{x5 xf,E SRWI YRP TIWi WT EAK M 91E NLF m .Y11' _ _ _ QGV.MfIKE61YMM11 KMIE[ Wi� ` 21Nt m6E1C0]l fxTWIE EL E NSTNIEO .i Ml WallY:lYl Lmxxe � E`EI! ,�� Mp 1 Eurox .,o LTTaaI mxrxm M axN.clm s,ru wt9a[ La.,aa PLzoa�IrY Pw m,enLap .YL EKTw xx EPaial E M � 1 PxiELr NEA M fMCULIW 9V1L VE EUEMM LCM6 EmSEY _ 'llm[ BA91 x5p115. RW! M6INCIInI 1RNIE3. NmL1 CVIIIY 9MYSL i {91LE CnlIM1 9VlL fY.ExE xM q/iY MO IYIYIE �. _ _e•_ �� 'E�� }igCWr M PRCLLLi UI,R IOSPrW3 m 1[ \aN F 1[ Op6L ' i— lE EMA.LIP(5 E4VX9alR N146 ML WFIdL.rAE A4 w.e .�� Epq➢ m PPEMNr EN®Ynl Mi M EPI91N0 6 SLL lE OplP _ _ WV fIELi M Cn111UC1R5 ETI.CS tl 00m NI m MOILti �+ —�� PA�VLmir ` xalNLa'`siwl�aaiaVa sw�sG NFIOaD rSTT L.a n.Ll urtcim oars swL E aEM6 m M � Ymseavx�r � u®a mLP�iPnL u�i Eno�n Vi iY� KIFP M 1MF 6 6iIHIBTT. �_ A P)LIIURG 91xL NSINL 1EIPFMY MfT FM16'1Y (YILO El wo- wrvxo,p xLaNT xi um, ervl aurz paK xlEcan n ap _ _ _ - — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � wlalNlcm,. _ Gr&hng Legend f�a14 � IL.Eu au sCml MM lmvinl $4iiMY YpA Lx.x — — CYrYC WR ® RP? NaIIxCMx pIxANE f� vWsar axon sAx.Ei ® nw E.PwmYr, WI svi an.mx _ am o¢rnw y�` m eo eoiiN� E aLr...¢ rru (O•. WALFIC. QKIMV QQ' rE, roxno, s x. LK.Ym AEaS plflm ax m m6lpCml rcPYEs EeT E E wm a. Pm rEAs rm aa'E E 1, a arAlm Esiw.Tax Nm mP w Yom lHT EnP¢, a Eapm. T. PL9C sm¢R usn sa xNAxc sau E pvl rK1 E zE rw Tma slEEr sEvwc alx. E rvacan oral. x -j a® NOT FOR C:ON3 UFMC PHASE TWO GRADING DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN seer C4 r S M1Y.4aW0lLlBNI' �¢ Rp1.IDB1 RYSE OME BU6lM1C N.CW sR fYY.I.iNX M.IRB NJB. etl\ Sft0.5 �COM tlIPI.II 1BBJJrBJIOTK wl&ro../[MSIORa'lY'YI RpmtlRMt¢[4Ei(IfK a. _ _... III 1I ,+++ 2M WATER POND °CIVIL DRAWINGS . j SITEDATA r.Yr rEa sv RPIm�.�Y1A 1�9K[1 � ru.) nsa AVl9Y]� � y 1 M.•� AILL m✓� ------- BEWWMMtAY. — iOpOIBIMM(R Monre _— �7ppWER56lVD• _ VERALL SITE PLAN - PHASE TWO Y r EONE SITE DATA =5a II 1"iMrHORN IR��_ pIUMEMMEMI�DMG N 003 ',uae4 s as Y1PDtlP11.EEOEIOfK µHYN{Fllu!41iiiY .Y. I.Ii fMOI. )p1LL Y.'S� ,apR 4]6. - IYGroBIB.! � � ..aolromE caela,rm. + OVERALL SITE PLAN - PHASE ONE uu— 1-=50' rmm YMIIER PPUPEVIIS Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 OVERALL PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO SITE PLANS I I.Q.MiE\I M4M..RMaiR. Rd kY.I rlkrlk Mfst rE Y li\0 ,��\ 3trzaia0 4�4 M m+4 a SIBET A^^//L March 5, 2009 Mr. Robert Generous Sr. Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ref: United Properties application for development Erhart Property — SE Corner of Highway 212 and Powers Blvd. Dear Bob: United Properties, on behalf of the landowner Timothy Erhart, would like to reinstate our development application for the subject property. As discussed with you last week, we will resubmit our plans for the development shortly with the only change being elimination of any reference to Fairview being involved with the project. Although we remain hopeful Fairview will anchor this project, we have not been authorized to use their name in connection with this project at this time. Ideally we would move forwards with public hearing process beginning in late April or early May, and not beforehand Please advise on any additional items you may need from us in order to reinstate the application; we previously provided an escrow to the City in connection with the application and we presume the City continues to retain this escrow to process our application. Sincer William P. Katter Sr. Vice President United Properties U-C (952)837-8525 Cc: Tim Erhart Robb Gruman — Fairview Health Systems 3500 American Blvd W Suite?00 Minneapolis, MN 551431 T 952 835 5300 F 952 893 8206 upmpcllies com UNITED PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT NARRATIVE SUPPLEMENT FOR POWERS CROSSING PROFESSIONAL CENTER CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Submitted On April 1, 2009 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED APR 0 2 2009 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEFT Powers Crossing Professional Center April 1.2009 Introduction On July 3, 2008, United Properties LLC, on behalf of Powers Crossing Medical LLC, a joint venture between Dawne and Timothy Erhart and United Properties Investment LLC, submitted a development application for a proposed medical office building located at the southeast corner of (new) Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard in Chanhassen, Minnesota. The building, as proposed, will be a two-phase, 160,000 sq. ft., medical office building. The first phase will be a three-story, 72,000 sq. ft. building with a two-story, 16,000 sq. ft. link on the north end, providing a total building area ofW sq. ft. The link will eventually serve as the connection point to a matching three-story, 72,0,00 sq. ft. building in the second phase. Because the second phase depends on right-of-way along Highway 212 currently controlled by Mn/DOT, we request approval to transfer density from the phase two building and add a fourth story to the phase one building if Mn/DOT is unwilling to turn back this right-of-way. The end result would be a four-story,4492;000Sq. ft. building with parking built to City code requirements. On July 15, 2008, the City sent a written response to United Properties requesting justification for the variance requests contained in the original application. The three variances requested pertain to the Bluff Creek Overlay District, building height, and signage. Below are the justifications for each variance request addressing the criteria in Section 20-58 of the Chanhassen City Code for the first two variances and Section 20-1253 for the signage variance. Bluff Creek Overlay District On -site, we request a variance to grade and construct a driveway surface within the secondary zone of the Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOD). Off -site, south of the access road, we request a variance to construct a storm water detention pond and site for the City's lift station in the both the Primary and Secondary Zone of the BCOD. • Enforcement causes undue hardship. Because this is the first development of its nature in this area, no comparable properties exist within 500 feet to meet the Code's definition of "undue hardship." However, we believe this is a reasonable request given the somewhat arbitrary nature of the BCOD boundary line. • Conditions don't generally apply to property with same zoning classification. Throughout the City, properties with an Office and Institutional (OI) zoning classification which are not adjacent to the BCOD are not subject to the more restrictive development requirements of the BCOD. Moreover, grading within the primary and secondary BCOD zones will be necessary to complete the City's access road, and our plans are similar to the City's grading needs. • Variance is not driven by desire to increase value. We request this variance to effectively balance the needs of the City, the landowner, the developer, and the anchor tenant. • Hardship is not self-created. We do not believe this hardship is self-created. • Variance is not detrimental to public welfare. We believe the site studies submitted with our original application show that the variance requested will not be a detriment to public welfare. • Variance will not impair surrounding property. We believe the site studies submitted with our original application show that the variance requested will not impair surrounding property. Furthermore, the current landowner will retain ownership of United Properties LLC Powers Crossing Professional Center April 1, 2009 approximately 100 acres of undeveloped land. This landowner would not allow a development on 12% of the land to impair the remaining 88% of the property. Building Height The proposed phase one and phase two buildings (principle structures) are three stories high, and the phase two parking garage is three stories high with one additional level for proof of parking. As mentioned in the introduction above, we also request approval to transfer density from the phase two building and add a fourth story to the phase one building if Mn/DOT is unwilling to turn back this right-of-way. The end result would be a four-story, 112,000 sq. ft. building with parking built to City code requirements. The OI District allows for a maximum height of two stories for principal structures and one story for accessory structures. Because Community Development Department staff recommended rezoning the current site to the OI District, we request a variance from the height requirements. • Enforcement causes undue hardship. Because this is the first development of its nature in this area, no comparable properties exist within 500 feet to meet the Code's definition of "undue hardship." In fact, precisely because no properties exist within 500 feet, a height restriction could be seen as an undue hardship. • Conditions don't generally apply to property with same zoning classification. Given the parcel's fixed border created by Highway 212, Powers Boulevard, and the Bluff Creek Overlay District, we cannot expand the site to reduce the height of the buildings. Sites with the same zoning classification don't generally face a similar inability to expand. • Variance is not driven by desire to increase value. We request this variance to create sufficient space for medical providers to meet the demand for medical services from residents of Chanhassen and the surrounding area. • Hardship is not self-created. We do not believe this hardship is self-created. • Variance is not detrimental to public welfare. We believe the plans submitted with our original application show that the variance requested will not be a detriment to public welfare. • Variance will not impair surrounding property. We believe the plans submitted with our original application show that the variance requested will not impair surrounding property. The hills and forests surrounding this property act as a natural buffer to neighboring parcels. Signa e In lieu of providing two monument signs, one for each building, we request a variance for consolidation to one monument sign with a combined area and height 95 percent larger than currently allowed in the OI District. As medical office buildings have signage needs more similar to retail than traditional office, we feel this will provide for the signage needs of the tenants while still holding to the spirit of City's signage requirements. The sign base will be constructed of similar materials used on the building to compliment the architecture. With the natural hills surrounding this property as well as the man-made hills from the construction of Highway 212, we believe the modest signage allowed by the City causes hardship when viewed in a topographical context. Additionally, since we regard this variance request as a consolidation of signage, rather than an upsizing, we believe our request does not United Properties LLC Powers Crossing Professional Center April 1, 2009 adversely affect the spirit or intent of the City's signage ordinance. Finally, we believe the requested variance creates the added benefits of reducing site clutter and enhancing public welfare by improving visibility for the elderly and medical patients in stressful, emergency situations United Properties LLC Powers Crossing Professional Center April 1, 2009 CONTACT INFORMATION Developer and Fee Owner Representative United Properties LLC As agent for Powers Crossing Medical LLC 3500 American Boulevard West Minneapolis, MN 55431 Attention: Bill Katter 952.837.8525 1 Phone 952.893.8206 1 Fax will iam.katter@uproperties.com Architect Pope Associates, Inc. 1255 Energy Park Drive St. Paul, MN 55108-5118 Attention: Paul Holmes 651.789.1582 1 Phone 651.642.1101 1 Fax pholmes@popearch.com Civil Engineer Westwood Professional Services 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Attention: Dan Parks 952.906.7435 Phone 952.937.5822 Fax dan.parks@westwoodps.com United Properties LLC September 4, 2008 `�. City of Chanhassen Planning Department City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Westwood PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: P of �l ServITas Ed. Ram, MN 55344 wux 952-937-515 E�x %M32-5822 TOLL TREE 1b 37-SM EwuE wTxowestwwdps.<an wwwr.weshaodps.Tom CITY OF CHANHASSEN RFCFniFp Fairview Chanhassen Medical Center — Response to APR 0 2 2009 City Comment Letter (Planning Case #08-16) File 20061094.01 Dear Planning Department: CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEFT Westwood staff has reviewed the city comment letter dated 07/15/08 for the above - referenced project. Responses to each comment are provided below, and the submittal documents have been revised to address the issues. We believe that the plans and submittal materials are now complete and would appreciate your consideration in scheduling this project for the earliest available City of Chanhassen Planning Commission agenda. VARIANCE Variance requests require that the applicant provide, via narrative, a justification for each variance request addressing the criteria of Section 20-58 of the Chanhassen City Code. The variances include building height and encroachment into and setback from the Bluff Creek primary zone. The sign variance request should address the criteria in section 20-1253 of the Chanhassen City Code. A narrative has been created by United Properties that addresses justification for the variances. This narrative is under a separate cover within the submittal package. SITE PLAN • The parking ramp must beset back at least 35 feet from the future ramp right-of- way. The buildings and traffic circulation need to be shifted to the south. The parking structure has been shifted south to accommodate this request. Refer to the architectural and civil plans for clarity. • The site plan should incorporate an interim landscape buffer plan for the Phase I project perimeter. A Phase 1 Landscape Plan has been created and inserted into the civil plan set to address this comment. E S T A B I z S w E D i N i 9 7 2 TVM CITIESIMMO SL CIOOD BRAINEBD September 4, 2008 Page 2 ". • Eliminate the sidewalk to Powers Boulevard and replace with sidewalks to the access road and the trail adjacent to the Highway 312 ramp as part of Phase 2. The sidewalk to Powers Boulevard has been eliminated and a sidewalk has been 1NO°d extended to the access road. These changes are reflected in both the architectural plans and the civil plans. • Trees on the landscape plan are shown down the middle ofthe trail near the off ramp of Highway 312. The landscape plan has been revised to show trees and plantings south of the trail near Highway 312. • A swale of 2% is required west of the parking garage. The grading plan has been revised to show a 2% swale. • Show truck turning template for appropriate size delivery trucks. Truck turning movement graphics have been created for city delivery trucks at the 4' dock as well as movements for a WB-50 in clock- and counter -clock -wise directions around the main building. • Switch the location of the sanitary sewer with the water main location on the east side of the building, or move the sanitary to the west side of the building. Switching the water and sanitary locations create difficulties in maintaining a 10 foot horizontal separation between water and sanitary & storm sewers. The utility plan was not revised to show this request. • Maintain 10 feet of separation between storm, sanitary, and water main. A 10 foot separation has been accommodated between water and storm and water and sanitary sewers. Sanitary and storm sewer may be closer than 10 feet in some locations. • Proof of parking is shown on land not currently owned by the applicant. Provide from MNDOT a time frame for the proposed turn back of the right-of-way to be incorporated in the project. We have contacted Keith McMurray at MNDOT and discussed the time line of reconveyance on two separate occasions. MNDOT acknowledges that we have an official request into them (#2007-0085) and that it is in their system. We understand that the reconveyance review process has been started, but at this time is not complete. Mr. McMurray stated that the reconveyance of property would not happen until this fall or later. We will update the City of Chanhassen as we receive new information from MNDOT. E STAR LI S H F 0 1 H 1 9 planning > engineering > surveying September 4, 2008 Page 3 W The building acreage and property access exhibit, sheet SKP06, does not provide a permissible nor feasible access to the area between Got 1, Block I and the wetland located to the east of the lot. The driveway shown to access the remnant Westwoodwetland is unbuildable. Since there is no legitimate access, this area may not be used in determination offuture density. Comment noted. The SKP06 exhibit has been removed from the submittal materials. SUBDIVISION • Chanhassen City Code requires that the primary zone be composed of 100 percent open space. The areas within the Bluff Creek Primary Zone shall be incorporated within separate outlots or be covered by a conservation easement. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 463.358, subd. 2a, the regulations shall require that subdivisions be consistent with the municipality's official map if one exists and it's zoning ordinance, and may require consistency with other official controls and the comprehensive plan. The property owner will work with the city in crafting a conservation easement over the subject areas. • The grading plan should be revised to reduce the impacts to trees and within the Bluff Creek Primary Zone. Grading has been reduced in the storm pond area by providing a retaining wall. Refer to the grading plan for details. • A tree removal calculation shall be provided for the development contained with this project. Tree removal calculations are provided on the Phase 2 landscape plan. A shaded line has been added to the plan to clarify the area used for calculating canopy coverage. • Street profile should be shown on the same sheet as the sanitary sewer profile. Also include horizontal curve information. The access road profile is shown on the sanitary sewer profile graphic. Horizontal curve information is provided. • The roadway should be constructed to the east property line of the proposed Fairview parcel and a temporary cul-de-sac should be provided. The plans have been revised to show a temporary cul-de-sac meeting the City's design guidelines. ESTAUL!SNED iN 1172 planning> engineering > sumeying September 4, 2008 Page 4 W • Provide a minimum of a 4-foot median near the entrance to Powers Boulevard along with a left turn lane into the Fairview site. The plans have been revised to show a 6.67 foot wide median at the intersection of Westwood the access road and Powers Boulevard. • Narrow the roadway to a 36 foot maximum east of the second access into Fairview. The plans have been revised to show a 36 foot road width east of the second access. Forcemain location must be shown north of the site. The plans have been revised to show the sanitary forcemain running along the south side of the access road to the east. The forcemain crosses the access road and then heads north, adjacent to the lake/pond. • Lift station pad must line up with the existing sanitary line. Access shall be provided off of Powers Boulevard. The plans have been revised to meet this request. • Pond dead storage is insufficient. The applicant should investigate directing the drainage from north of the developed site in such a manner as to bypass the pond thereby minimizing the need for additional dead storage. The pond has been enlarged slightly to provide sufficient dead storage. The east drainage is routed through the pond; a bypass is not necessary and is not included in the design. See the attached Preliminary Storm Water Report for detailed analysis and calculations. • Maximum pond depth is 10 feet. The pond depth has been adjusted to reflect a 10 foot maximum depth. • Provide full-size drainage maps showing entire drainage areas. Full-size drainage maps have been attached to the revised storm water report. • Drainage maps do not match drainage calculations. Drainage maps and calculations have been revised to match each other. • Street grade within 30 feet of Powers Boulevard must be less than or equal to 3916. Access road grade within 30 feet of Powers Boulevard has been adjusted to meet this criterion. s i I %; i s n r o , . 7 2 planning > engineering > surveying September 4, 2008 Page 5 W • The subdivision cannot plat the property that is currently owned by MnDOT. The preliminary plat has been revised to include only the property currently owned by the applicant. Westwood • Show drainage and utility easements on the preliminary plat. Drainage and utility easements have been provided on the preliminary plat. • Provide snow storage for the trail along the Highway 312 off ramp and along the access road. Snow storage has been provided for the trail along the Highway 312 off ramp and along the access road. • A street light is needed at the intersection of Powers Boulevard and the access road. The lighting and photometric plan has been revised to show a street light at the intersection of the access road and Powers Boulevard. • Applicant needs to maintain existing drainage patterns as shown on Overview Map #3 prepared by MnDOT for the TH 312 designlbuild which was supplied by the City to Westwood on July 1, 2008. Drainage previously/currently directed to the west side of Powers Boulevard is shown to be directed down ditch on the east side of Powers Boulevard without any calculations showing the ability of the receiving water to handle this discharge. Existing drainage patterns, as currently in place, have been maintained Currently drainage flows south along the east side of Powers Boulevard. Drainage then flows beneath Powers, east to west, via a 24" RCP pipe. Proposed storm water discharges from the Fairview are less than or equal to existing storm water runoff rates from the site. • Applicant needs to show outlet for the water body south of the Highway 312 on ramp north of the subject property. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan has been revised to show this outlet. • The applicant is strongly encouraged to employ storm water storage and treatment below the parking lot in order to minimize the necessary pond size, thereby minimizing impacts within the primary zone. This water can be used for irrigation purposes. Comment noted and will be considered by the applicant. Provide adequate erosion/sediment controls consistent with the NPDES Construction permit and the City of Chanhassen's standards. This includes, but N : , r , planning > engineering > surveying September 4, 2008 Page 6 `�. is not limited to: • Installation of silt fence down gradient of all disturbed soils. westvuood a Installation of a rock construction entrance with a minimum length of 75 feet. ■ Stabilization of all channels for at least the fina1100 feet prior to discharge of site or into the storm sewer infrastructure. ■ Placement of ditch checks within the existing ditch in existing Drainage Area 2. Erosion and sediment control measures will be outlined in a SWPPP that will be included with construction level drawings. • A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan will be required. A SWPPP will be included with construction level drawings. TRAFFIC STUDY Attached to this letter is a memo written by our traffic engineering staff that address the following four comments in addition to comments from MNDOT and Carver County. • Update traffic counts to current county estimates. Get traffic model from Carver County. • Traffic report states that a trajfic signal is required. Carver County spacing guidelines are not met at this location. Discussions between MnDOT, Carver County, and the City are needed to see if a traffic signal can be installed at this location. • Development will occur on the opposite side of this proposed access road. Has this been taken into account in the traffic report? Ifso, what are your assumptions? • What happens to the intersection on the Highway 101 side in the year 2020 when this area is fully developed? WETLANDS Please refer to the previously submitted and approved wetland delineation report dated August 2006 for the subject property. This report addresses the wetland comments below. planning > engineering > wrveying September 4, 2008 Page 7 W The applicant needs to clearly indicate all delineated wetland boundaries including the date the delineation was completed and the entity performing the delineation. The City reserves the right to verify the wetland boundaries per Minnesota Rules 8420 Westwood and may request that a portion or all of the wetland boundaries are re -staked as existing conditions may have been significantly altered since the original delineation was performed. e The applicant needs to clearly indicate all wetland buffers. e The applicant needs to clearly indicate all wetland setbacks. • The applicant needs to clearly indicate the wetland mitigation area. Please contact me if you have any questions, would like to discuss any of the issues above in further detail, and when this project has been scheduled for the next available Planning Commission agenda. Sincerely, WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES X-4z-�- Ryan M. Edstrom, PE Attachments Cc: File Denton Mack — Pope Associates Tun Erhart — Exlar Bill Katter—United Properties E s T g e i i s H E D 14 19 7 2 planning > engineering > surveying MEMORANDUM `�. Date: September 4, 2008 Re: Chanhassen Medical Office Development Traffic Study westvvood File 20061094 To: City of Chanhassen Planning Department From: Bruce Boje Nicholas J. Erpelding, P.E., PTOE rreD.eee na.,vwl s..im EOm mane. W 553" u.,. 952.937-5150 FAX 952-937-5872 IOIE E.E, I418"37-5150 EIIMI wpSM6tW000Pxmm 5w.e...le9.`00*"m.1 In response to your July 15'h, 2008 comments regarding Westwood's July 3 d Traffic Study, we offer the following responses. Comment 1: Update traffic counts to current county estimates. Get traffic model from Carver County. ADTs from MNDOT were used in the model. Response: Westwood contacted Mr. Roger Gustafson with Carver County to request the most recent estimates on Tuesday, July 29`h. After following Mr. Gustafson's direction to contact SRF Consulting Group, a response was received from SRF as follows: Please find the attached scan with forecast volumes from the Carver County Transportation Plan. As you will see, only one volume is given on Powers in your study area, and would apply to the entire segment between Lyman and Pioneer. The volumes shown here represent the preferred scenario for the County plan, which is the "State + County Improvements". Other scenarios include forecasts ranging from 18,000 to 21,000 vpd on Powers in this location. Please note that these forecasts do not take into consideration two significant land uses near this site: 1) the new high school being built on the north side of Lyman just west of Audubon, and 2) a proposed shopping mall near the intersection of Lyman and Powers. I hope this information helps. Please let me know if anything else comes up. Paul Paul Moms Transportation Engineer SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Along with the following sketch: P S T A 5 - : i " E ^ . 7 7rrltl CRIEAMEt00 n CLWD 11M81E31D September 4, 2008 Page 2 ". Figure 1: SRF/Carver County Preliminary 2030 ADT forecasts tiileStWOOfI ®CONSULTING GROUP, INC. SSd3 www.5r/C0n5u1ilnq.Com 1 764A75.0010 Fae7tL47510 Cam' NO' C4.vrr Coffin Tr�wS orf t+ow Sheet I � CompName f'J P P%n By pw..l M. Date 7/r7/od Computation for 2030 O�il�Fertc4lr YdupeJ Checked by- Date 0 0 C V zc,000 8,600 18 i ra Im va M Zlz cROoo - ztz so, New Actors 9, dA0 17, 7CO As noted by SRF, the ADT forecasts completed are general in nature, with only one ADT forecast for the entire Powers Boulevard segment from Lyman Boulevard on the north to Pioneer Trail on the south. (It should also be noted that these preliminary F -. - s _ ; " a 1 - ; planning > engineering > surveying September 4, 2008 Page 3 �`. forecasts do not yet appear to have been formally published as part of the County's Comprehensive Plan update.) Westwood The SRF forecast of 19,600 ADT for this segment of Powers Boulevard in 2030 appears consistent with the Westwood's projected year 2020 ADT range of 16,900 to 21,800 shown on Figure 8 of the report. Comment 2: Traffic report states that a traffic signal is required. Carver County spacing guidelines are not met at this location. Discussions between MnDOT, Carver County, and the City are needed to see if a traffic signal can be installed at this location. Response: The 2003 Kimley-Horn Chanhassen AUAR includes no discussion of the operations of this intersection. The report does indicate on Figure 11 that side street stop control is proposed for the intersection, which was analyzed as a "T" intersection (the 4a'/east leg was not included). Westwood's July 3rd traffic report notes that based solely on level of service, a traffic signal would be required concurrent with Phase 2 development in order to prevent the exiting left turn movement from dropping to an unacceptable LOS. Though the comment was made that a traffic signal would be "required," it was made with the understanding that one would not be installed until it was fully warranted and justified. In the metro area, it is common for a side street stop controlled intersection to operate with failing side street movements during peak times. Such intersections can and do remain side street stop controlled indefinitely. The appropriate course of action is to monitor the intersection as traffic volumes grow to determine if and when changes in intersection control should be made. To further assess when traffic volumes at the intersection might necessitate installation of a traffic signal, additional analysis was undertaken. The turning movement volumes forecasted in the report were compared with the traffic volume warrants for the installation of a traffic signal identified in the current Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD). ,_ < , _ ,;; " , r; i , , : planning > engineering > surveying w September 4, 2008 Page 4 Table 1 Wan -ant Analysis Summary Warrant Hours Required: Hours Met: 2010 12010 No -Build I Build 2012 Build 2020 Build (Phase 1) (Phase 2) Phase 3a I Phase 3b IA 8 2 2 2 2 2 1B 8 7 7 7 7 7 1C 18 1 1 1 1 1 2 14 6 6 16 6 6 3 11 4 5 15 5 5 Assumptions: 1. Based on peak hour volumes in July 3, 2008 Traffic Analysis Report 2. Hourly variation assumed from MnDOT ATR 458 (2007 volumes). 3. Right turn volumes excluded. 4. 0.70 factor applied (located on high speed roadway - 40 MPH+). 5. 2+ approach lanes for both Powers Boulevard and Site Collector Roadway. The results documented in Table 1 show that the amount of traffic contributing toward the fulfillment of signal warrants remains nearly constant as development of the subject site proceeds from vacant through full build. This is explained by the fact that the primary generator of traffic contributing toward fulfillment of signal warrants is development to the west of Powers Boulevard, not development on the subject site. (As is noted in the response to comment 3, below, full development of the Chanhassen AUAR site to the west of Powers Boulevard was assumed by 2010.) To further assess what contribution traffic from the subject site has toward fulfillment of signal warrants, the analysis was updated with the assumption that the site to the west remains vacant. With this assumption, in contrast, the number of hours each warrant is met increases as development proceeds. At full build out, the number of hours for which warrants are met is just below that of the 2010 No -Build scenario in Table 1. This confirms that traffic from the subject site is not the primary contributor to the need for signalization. ESTABLISHED IN 1 9 7 2 plmw*M > engkEaaring > sarveybg September 4, 2008 Page 5 Table 2 Warrant Analysis Summary — No development west of Powers Boulevard Warrant Hours Required: Hours Met: 2010 Build 2012 Build 2020 Build (Phase 1) (Phase 2) Phase 3a Phase 3b IA 8 0 0 2 0 1B 8 0 4 7 4 1C 8 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 2 6 3 3 1 10 1 1 4 2 Assumptions: 1. Based on peak hour volumes in July 3, 2008 Traffic Analysis Report 2. Hourly variation assumed from MnDOT ATR 458 (2007 volumes). 3. Right turn volumes excluded. 4. 0.70 factor applied (located on high speed roadway - 40 MPH+). 5. 2+ approach lanes for both Powers Boulevard and Site Collector Roadway. 6. Assumes no adjacent development west of Powers Blvd. It is further noted that in the metro area, an intersection must typically meet more than one warrant in order justify installation of a traffic signal. This is due to in partto delay increasing for the mainline and the increased potential for mainline rear end collisions. Based on the analysis completed, traffic volumes at the intersection will be close but may not fully justify installation of a traffic signal through full build out of the site in 2020. Noting that a signal was forecast to be necessary in terms of level of service concurrent with Phase 2 in 2012, the intersection would be expected to operate at poor LOS during peak times with good LOS the remainder (and majority) of the day. Access Spacing The intersection of Powers Boulevard and Site Collector Roadway does not meet the prescribed full access spacing of/4 mile along Powers Boulevard, as identified on the figure on page 4.39 in the most current version of the Carver County Comprehensive Plan. With approximately 820 feet of spacing provided, center -to -center, it falls 500 feet, or 38% short. It is Westwood's understanding that the location of this intersection was selected during design of the TH 212 project to best fit with the natural topography and wetland constraints. While it is true that full '/4 mile spacing is not met at the chosen location, it represents a workable compromise location. Without having completed a formal analysis of the corridor, but based on experience with similar situations, it is esrAsusk[o IN isra planning> engineering> surveying September 4, 2008 Page 6 ". anticipated that signal timing and phasing plans can be developed to accommodate the selected intersection location without compromising the operational integrity of the Powers Boulevard corridor. YYestrrood Other noteworthy considerations include the fact that the Site Collector Roadway intersection is the only intersection proposed in the roadway segment between the TH 212 south ramps and Pioneer Trail just under'/2 mile to the south feet to the south. Because this segment is less than mile in length, no access location will be able to provide the necessary full 'Amile spacing required on both resulting segments. Finally, a 4-lane roadway section with turn lanes such proposed for this stretch of Powers Boulevard is typically capable of carrying over 40,000 ADT. 2030 volume forecasts are in the 20,000 ADT range, meaning a substantial capacity cushion is likely to exist. Comment 3: Development will occur on the opposite side of this proposed access road Has this been taken into account in the traffic report? If so, what are your assumptions? Response: As noted on page 1 of the Westwood Traffic Report, "The Chanhassen 2005 Alternative Urban Area -Wide Review (AUAR) prepared in 2003 for the City of Chanhassen by the consultant team of Hoisington Koegler Group Inc., Kimley Hom and Associates, Peterson Environmental Consulting, 106 Group and HDR was used in the determination of background traffic volumes and traffic assignment process." Full build of the Chanhassen AUAR area was assumed by 2010, as assumed in the Chanhassen AUAR. The turning movement volume illustrations, Figures 5-8, reflect this assumption. Comment 4: What happens to the intersection on the Highway 101 side in the year 2020 when this area is fully developed? Response: The traffic study completed is intended to provide support for Phases 1 and 2 of the proposed development only. This includes the two medical office buildings located immediately adjacent to Powers Boulevard south of the TH 212 ramps. Consideration of development of a Phase 3 was done only to gauge anticipated future traffic conditions at intersections impacted by Phase 1 and 2 development, not to provide a full analysis of the impacts of Phase 3 development. ESTABLISHED IN 1972 planning> engineering> Surveying September 4, 2008 Page 7 "• Due to the small magnitude of development proposed for Phases 1 and 2, a full analysis of the impacts of the extension of the site collector roadway to CSAH 101 was vYestvvood not undertaken. The report does note (in Figure 4) that only 5% of the site generated traffic from the subject medical office site is forecast to use the extension to connect to CSAH 101. This 5% would amount to fewer than 300 trips per day, well below the often -used 1,000 ADT minimum threshold for detailed study. It is anticipated that detailed study of the Site Collector roadway extension to CSAH 101 will be completed at the time formal development plans for Phase 3 are put forth. E5 TA9E15NE0 IN 1972 >N > TRANSMITTAL LETTER Date: Aprill zoos To: City of Chanhassen Project- Powers Crossing Professional Center Attn: Bob Generous Job Number: 75372-07230a Address- 7700 Market Boulevard In Re: City Re -Submittal Documents WE "ARE SENDING ® Attached: rl Under Separate Cover: M Via: One -hour Courier ❑ Shop Drawings Section 0000 ❑ Prints ® Plans ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Change Order ® Disks ® Other Copies Date No. Description - 16 City Re -Submittal Documents I Stormwater Calcs and Drainage Plans I CD with PDF's I IIXI7 City Re -Submittal Documents I Westwood Response Letter dated 9/4/o8 I Project Narrative ❑ For Approval ® For Your Use ❑ As Requested ® For Review and Comment ❑ For Bids Due ❑ Approved as Submitted ❑ Approved as Noted ❑ Returned for Corrections File Matt Volpano, United Properties Pope Associates Inc. 1255 Energy Park Drive I St. Paul, MN 55108-5118 Main (651) 642-9200 I Fax (651) 642-1101 Resubmit ❑ Submit ❑ Copies for Approval ❑ Prints Returned After Loan to Us ❑ Other: CITY F CHANHASSEN Signed: Denton Mack 0 2 2009 FBCXmE A R C H I T E C T S www.popearch.com SCANNED POWERS CROSSING PROFESSIONAL CENTER POWERS BLVD CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA CITY SUBMITTAL SET VICINITY MAP m SHEET INDEX o : � IDRYP6FlEI . • '..PMLVd GENERAL i �$ .\I ppEffiI/Y.VlliHl0.Y: 96PfERf CIVELILANDSCAPE EI P�muuunnsloNSAUY\oaa�nucuevry � Q IE9W.UYM1 O R141NIQInf1EMX p IIMY1N16NI.Y lI.wYi llYlL Av Fl(/a@lalLYll 4 n m\sEiAnYmm n.v � a wua.Ernnnrtw � IMi!L\!AaLVE M1.\� 1. IIN41LlWIM M\ YI Im10[N[ILU facmulrtnr slaurLW � IIORtIDLL"F W440nSW®1! ARCHITECTURAL AI OVFL\LLPILIY M£AAV MI tElW 9lElIAN AI EAIA(CEDSIIEPI.AN-IIIA¢ME` 81:ILpAG FJ1V AIbNS lI IAEE ONE ws auEnwc vvvnrays-nuui\vo PAYtLWi fiAEA4EIXtEEC{pFVAlKK15.F1Aff1VD POrt A50M16 ML �ExvEY Pure DaW 5*. PALt,MNrro. PxYNEE FY YNw� UNITED PENTIES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 -TY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED APR 0 2 2009 CHANHASSEN PLANMNG DEPT TITLE SHEET MAP, DIRECTORY SHEETINDEX IerY:�: \=Y Sb,iYIStl OeJ1Yl AlSCANNED LELM0 CV of Q N1M• G fn¢�Lw/ • mne Q o Im Iv[ -ter Im umm�o ♦ rnr• iE NC.MW —f sw�avr ss•x a rac m � �r nm� eur � _a ra4 e ✓wlowva ® ua uw Q � 0 no cu .m'iu 17� wars wry¢ —�` .uar ��•. ®m w.m ® usrm v.�zmae .0 u. �ma sr w nc r• —•—�✓. ONE T@My STATE p CM.I. Yn. Id Yrw I-W}I54-1116 TREE EVVENTOWY E .E A dpdm L I I. BL MN M02 IAM1 MYI, ao[e'Mp b M. nm'We y I.I.I v f In ✓.�..Ia (dlhp •flrt� hbmmfm potlN O111M),I bwiy MM 3/IybS :)T FOR CONSTRUCTION u NITEP PSPPESTIES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 YI.C_oad ��r� �•im EMSTING CONDITIONS & TOPOGRAPIEC SURVEY . k lmm 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i I I I r 235 (w"00 a s9pMCI, r"A (J -off`,. Z I��I"m•. /'/ter 11 /I'r'le".iu'r I E,01rl CST' I I I I I I I I A MriPM7/ �__ II • sE RING`_ " ' ' SfiR°3'IJt 9fiPAm i I ' �-7 - I \ I � � >I� :� I � � � \\ \ I I nV✓I I I X 0' r50' X9' dp' NOT FOR CONSTRUCT!( Ldyd DA-Vdm mil � ., aIM1,� fiU,RANV9, ra NDN{ •�,. d ..,m.Ne � ...•L v.. dnlx io d gdlw d roles wasvo.' rrv.mwu mvme oevebpmma Summit" mlaes v.� Rrcalr a Idr r.r�� G.. SIO•II'xT A -Il M9 ' ' � L- M97 P fiJSAi A - Jr59'2r 1 l ;- J J, rl y53J t •�>°qI "•+M F eN�a .v SYa Mn c N„W MUA 10 MI Idil#n/ b pMk ^P � �^P ne tt�G^91N �Y arnnM1 M 461'^VkWIu W E.tera NlMl W HI Xov. OSIER STALEATE ONE QE GEL •r mr Ne Or-w-Rr r. Tr Pw I-aoo-ax-.ly � C—J• / \\ iy I I I I I I r — J I I I I 1 I A . 9•5I'JT L- DAY NB9°x'xT 179.33 II.FALOP�i- I I ' SM'�SP'IP I 'CA I \ I \ I I A I I I I I I 1 I i E I I � I ay.�nrrc9•c. ® Reees lea —.� c.aE ry plem, o a^Kdl9.dd, a dl�dn,� Q YN.. Ba ® d9 •a 8 a B rvO a ®iY p ®.I ..WYCLIfA¢ ~ ouvd as �'y:.�a'691F.1¢ w dF dIY —�— IdQ ✓E • ♦ Imv. � �a.7.nm .Om p BTa e • .181[F - - - nwu P. AFs I9 E" Puu Uzx T P R�a",n..Heoo Fnx psnw+wi pr JNITEO PROPERTIES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 YaaY ■ti. W rrrr PRELUMARY PLAT Jet-0)Yl M w] vvexxc sr.us x�m Plwa )» IOiK STMLS Y OUTLOT A b Me Legad ras emT® gm a up ally Yo wTRn PVO XaYII MTF 1E\6 RR.xMf w� �— Ipff cglapg v..T Q fAbE24E'WN g;>♦ IE/.VT WM1 BITYKVS PI. WlY pTn P.\9plli © N,MM,, NAH)I R P4W1G siN15 S o m.xgpO4R - � SIR WIIMf mvmc ppl - + vaxw vas • vauum � Posr .ID2 Same Pi..�bW S.rt�A Fc W Y b.P xM OOFlEA STATE ONE aNE CALL rw. wx .� uI-Yl-pa] _ y \ In ra r,� )-no-xsa-nu Geaael Stte Notes I . 1Mdp 1 �. e.Gwalo �A)Ixx sa nY PROEcr PRexpfD u .c41.pa vRacsvar2 gnpas L IOGTws ND FIEVAlI0N5 6 E1611NG 1wOTMMY MO V1x116 AS 1 / %7 mn s wo um" fiMPRavx.¢ mACTA svu »'JD wRv QGV.Tw/C061MICMN. i NR [60R]MRS IA R40. TE E«OFEV 9RMD BE 110rid R.EtRARY. x iarm ro earp.Rr suRscY va fioT ficwmw, alpxsas np .g.p .. .0 oxE)BWs uc m s.a s a.m m shwa rI¢ a awaw 1 �exxa anvaff IroivP. s. «PiFA ro ulwgcRxxi PWIs rm d.cr eunps oxpxpas .w I. spww s.mNAT .oc.Twxs a wrs. Russ. »xp mua voo¢ fi ui axp RAa Ave sx.0 a Ap MxT (ro PAo: a aw) was or�wxg xona ] N WB O 4XI A 91» S M12 INSM U,IER W ➢ 1 e rE COaPAalOI zx.0 eP IPweex ra PRouoxc up ..xrxlpw rXNin WIIRLL CfMa$ sW1 Y 6VAGOES ..MN6 9wS nJ, oPrecnoxxz sYu. Piwm¢ rpp uxlTs ro anma me sgK101i a TUfi1C ffE11E N4ESMY. PUQ1FMi Cf TESE pCMQi 9ULL H IARt4ID BY TE OlY WO dal♦II1 MI. I. R/ .T. IIR R tlNIRLL fE\BLS gY11 pUipW T A^PRt 11: YM]' ]TAW'W' I -�CS��- �l s. Lr11Yq.5 PAtFIF11T MO CaORT: ffCllM1ls TO H x AttaU.W£ ffl« IE?IYMAIIaS 6 Ti SO)EpxX:N. dalFd. El Site Detene Yaep . a)RR x MI. sere • arRR ] YGIxiAB1E allre . aTRR w+e aere A arRR e RRwaa axp fi MIEp� pep yq Reyµ ewmA«�a Taw ��i.«o arRR e MMAR caapx savux Ip Pfi1F]M.W axe R.1x AC2SmIL aaML MLE]MM RN1P I: amss .Pix spexa u rswpR.ar pwxas ox-ox-Gc munc x»N. �] PYiIEu p)a eM NO siw 9a1 PS, 9A4 1) M1CGS) Cpgp,fi p1E4asropAVO sTxPWp 1p ,YPE ] B.Ryyp ea re So v.\EIpI) gmpre xI pT_a],wfi ® Siga r.egeaa CWa to MuDOT De41L) s.I sTa sw W x W R-I sx xRlpll'IP .amlF )r x Ir W Wr xMlw xr x W MI ecax x a.Y x W Ra-n GID »Wx W sa x.wp pepmo 'r 'r W x M-1 xx-x s.e aplr Tax ✓r[ W x W W pwr w4 n5T T/p Wr p s.v W x W rtYp (R S)o wiSlwAx aoSylG W x W m1 SII 1E1D N' x N' MI- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION P. Assoxurxs lxc SE.. P. D. r. P.ut MN»an�p ruu+lnwxw� Ir UNITED PRDPERTIES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 iM.xY. .r_Y. aim rp` PHASE TWO CML SITE PLAN �e )urzarno IM _ uT _ SF6£T C3 Giding Leg`_ — PMaNR uxE —Ml_. �—Ysn tart caxlaN �YYz— �NYr� NiFRVK camas aN0 AND WT PfM MN A: NAIEA IEHl a, iF,ILE smn YRR .A. [M YCTw (N1N ItlAIP) .NITM1 SANI,T YRP IK'MxNL YALL wN IYF R� YXE wMlrw Lam ER�o9 axs,YunKA wTPAIIS NG 9AYRT run m GwT YAT 9p, EIF'An. nw GXcnw EJNOXr ovmxlw 91 .YpYL LOG,MI aEl Plorzcnox .)•. N..xW.B . 01 a IY.. NIu. QM*R STARE ONE CALL Tai wv AI.. o,tia-am Nl ra R.. 1-roast-na Grading Notes . Ltl` IIIXS NO FIEVAlIN6 6 EYEING lO'IRA4.,r NO YlY1Te5 K /� �� sp. w TM6 PIAII ME MXmw1m mlRAclw 9W1 IpLG van. 9rz MNlllnn xp Ynm LaA,Krp PKw ro vuvAnwvMNlNKnw M pa0 Yl E xonHn NXnAmr s AYr NaREPAxas Aa taro. z axl.Acne sl4l Erm ro ANo.rzcKlK Pura Ew vAcl LOCAlATS MO f Fl®]B 51FS1BUE a6ED PA�LENI. EAl `N10 xMxS. Ixllw KIXS NEGH aLOMI' gYP'9w; EYMi NRLMG YTUR EN= L:T=: EMII... 40 YIIBf11 Ci Wx15PalS 1 ML EICAMMM SxNl H x Ktgb/MZ MM M OF$lli EAM1 n 'Y,MYYO s1 m6 Pa IIEIMN ElluvnTSl MO aWSYL/4116ntE EslEHn9r PEPAmA.aG BY M aR ENOmd AS4VAlYN n YX®T4 l KL 061111® YfASm xFAS NE lU ECO,f iPK M6 6 mPYJL Kp sm UI sEm. nE4 AMAS sIN1 H WIEI® Ix1L n xEKMr siNlU 6 W65 6 wlMm. 4F VKYME xMl fw MN1NG AM TK \ fSl11B.WIi. 0. M MINACRN SxnLL H HIDwNS9E fHl A101dNG MO YAM,M91G TINK M11P0. CEMC6 4A1 K BANNIfES .ARWG 906. wSCMNK aYR IIA 1 NO Uw3 1G MIRR nE rp\OOR H A NfIF H®Mm Mm9116 n2Y HMLES SWIL H MNron➢ T M samaN PAA MmEN AAT1 lK LbIIM OE\'F$ SXNL CO{wYl a uL sLorts 9ulL H LBACm ro 11 w Iui1ER. INlls GII.RNsf .mrzG w 11R 9NL,. lwlwA surolrlm susA°¢ vMriAim s IaE sHi.maPo n r.E EIFVA1106 AE 910. w H1Hn 9AI PDXIS Alp rm'I.p wAGE1 a YGT ELLVAMS 9YJYi MILAR E19f9 PKLIEIIT FIEVAlIQ6. QR,fA nw uc oMER.H xmm. PRUY® MrtaNa ue m hBE➢ 9XAa wADCAG[ 2 HE HOIEONGI REPORT Pw PAVWDNT TKp(]SES AND M. GUNS m tl.RlClw 9W1 DOSE H 41Y CYRR 91 WIgK IIV.T F1SR NIfA M 9R LPI11< KN NNIr COSINM:MN 6 OJNFhG. D..aNl NSFVEf 6 Nl E%CES SEL YAIFAK N A YWIq �, ACL4TAYF m M arax Np M EauwG A0121 fl I,. �nm IFFI2gANNG .xl ®w ,2 KL fd61M11w wAu MEOW m IOLY, srA1E MU EELQK RIIIII 11 xwfMl. IH MMIK PUlY T E6 EINx1Att SISIEY 11PL4) \! NOW HWmFN13. L11 IROI m RAEIOIT OF KY SIRKBN£ w PANO . A PIKE N4. At \ KOMBd W MOND YIMY 61 N.[rz PAi1 •NM x1 E IYLI-IY.LFD 1MQOr-/JlE OIIIP 1p1gE PL NPIgFD fWAL M FAw 6 Y IFN.IGGYM EECNNS JNE NCfA N.RPWPI NK H2CMN Cf 1E EK[IVKd} 1EYIM VgUllxm NYA$ H f/iIYE YVII H \ [>LAM® xK RLYYK'IFO K 51l�YD xpUL \ 11. ESIYNOII WlE16LL flA® EXAM 9AlNK5 AW SIHET w PARIwL YFAE NWL E OPMRO N A('IOBIAN6 WM 1NE 9'E610 CIXYR 1(111m K WIIYm x YWT YIm31 IM M R.GI.R1xNR n M ®RONUL FLY6N. \ 16 [IIAIxIfNi W1ONL NOI NARD N ME BYENYG PTO. SIWER w PNNN N[K AWL E G'UVAC1E➢ N AttWIN6 NM IKaR91FN10 n llE pKNMr GyI(.'gr rl[111Lp K anllm N 1/001 Y1GE.y2 16 KL YH8 NO W1Wx51f5ThK $xK1 H LM1E2L .1 AN NMP .T #A"A fl 4NKONGK wOENI Efm NE %IIiP02 CE MwmG Y IINIIiE UI VBIITIHF 9J15 9WL BE [nIR£2L l MEOUWfY Br ME \� Ep1EOE.CK fNfml M C'l1A/{nA jXAIL Bi IQSPW90lE iw wolA,xc Nl Eawm 9u rzsrs up wsxctlws NM M �� i mrzp.rx Exvm,. Erosion Control Notes 1. ai M 1E. . al E .6TILd MOM 91E Y /1L ill M M AI® LGGMNB NEH SIWI a1FP NMiF YAT IFAYE 9PRIOI m ANr EKAVAIIN/W6INVLTw AG,IY116 2 PGO M6INICMx FMM4 aL a NSIWd Al ALL f81511bICMN pIRMS4 1 aUIYM IX OI®1 ONM: M ONM/Clw 9WL ASbLYE MPEIF 1@O®IIY 1pI ONIIYYIE Kl aTAIYI MD QOMI (f M NDICT MFA 1E WENM;M NWl YE NM1EW1 L[N6 MFHAYII m Gam RN p10YGN ABE aRMI .n1Y10.Yl,10! Wlm u,w !A!1 .mIR 1102 M611YIL'lIM FYNKIQS EINw Cwllla 6Mii. xp a! ropE. Mlma 9WL mNn1H NN vN➢.p Mp fpll.[ TNOIIOW! M AO[CT UMR If@lNA2 6 M OI. T 1E CIfR TE MIlMC10R5 E41AL�VIY WlAlED KL MLflpTAMYr ASHaNFn ro NEMMi ERG9w KD nE HP03lNG W X ME ONE11 NA,wEti M MI1MCitlfS llEIxCOS K OFflND il, m TG1EGi PMRR Alp WggplR MY GFP391YN 6 w NK w w fA00K PAgElli w N FpM STON ERRS M K ER SYYE ISMA{D If RA E/G MM AfFFCRl m wK1 E SMTO OEKEn ro ,H alL4KMN N M GM. KL Al nE � ff RE LwWK1Q NL 1FSfOtMY FAG971 LIX1110. 914E H IUgMD Br M tlY11RKI0R A�IFA RE n116 6 6,IHDIF➢. A CwmKICP 91NL NSTILL RYtlU9Y aEi PROIEC,KM (RICO 01 EPNMENT) M10..p Kl V.lO1 BA9Y 901E MEIS IEECRD 41 T6 COBIR.CIRIL S NL VPANO pFIB KMED UIF ro COR1RVCnw ACRNRES Y51 H ESOO EM 5® Yp IAlO4 9p. IIOCO C9 S! w E Xllp •.IAE i RMI Ep3 H WREIXN w ONGIRVCIIM S M MSK NM aWE W 11 w OEAIFA ESRNA1pX RM BW LP RND 1iA HAMFI p IE01E0. i. RBK YIIEEIS 114➢ M xWNG 9 ENP!i H9.l Mp GLrs snExT 9mNc 91K1 H arl[1m oKl. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Port AaowRa do SEII .PA.D.. T PML NN,,—.. FAN.,u .,+w IML or IIYITEl EITIES Powers Crossing Professional Centel City Submittal Set 4-01-09 o.r.EN. W rJYY ..xFoa� PHASE Two GRADING DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN WY NLE SH£F! C4 u ------------- ---------------- dF�Lwer.WvwYYw 2 e slMcmm� w .ueax0 nuu ��enaml-� 31PhL kTM smroru R 57 lef) 1W-e i-lE-w60 IETMIL WL E�.D E� mi)l KWJ -• 9fALL9 i � _ - s---- ---- CYFtlA - Lad.as..e imn . Nort Warm N.CW xM� • n. a (FT. 3) TLFN .1 iM 1 0.IX0 YImill e4000 x R1ASF dlE T4 FFE - 891.3 FFE a 894.3 Q U I ..1 a 1r ae� c-- -� StOlEl seW schedule / rM ry. rp rYrrww L.l My- .f.u1w .Ti n1iF�rl mmamm�®mu mrao®mmmm©p n�mm�m ¢tmvoEi�m� m�� mmmm0�tamo� mom me-n0®o mmmm�m©cau o� mmmmm®mr.I�m�m m®�m0oa�ocv ne�o mr.^w ©mm� m1:m� my mmmm ©onmo®e3 mc� msm®memo m©mvmm mms�oom©mom ocaomm©mY-au�-T,�mmmmomumn�m or.�mos�m©o o mm mmmmv vom om�m oomm�®©sax=u mmmmm�mocm©gym m®omomursam�m��Vi. oOmvEL70m�r.: V Dmommvpy�mm�m pppp C1f33©gym ®© 0 omm�o mcmmu umssa m0®mmrr>♦ mmamom o0om©�mmm®[�©gym mown �m �m m c�mvm o0 omv mmmmm� o�am©mumm®oon�„:�m ©o®a3m© m��m�m. ©r�--wa m ooums�m®omms� 0 omvE� m�oumommm®�-� mo�m�m oom©®�m�umOmmmmp m E�ao a�©oms-�.-mtommm©momo�m po�m�m oomm�m m�oumtamt�ams��..ampE-Si6ymo�m, oommao ooumm� mm�y©�m�m m�-'wamooum mommaoo 0o m mv� m:-®®mp®os,�a�m 0©o�m�m mr-�mst�o ou msura mm0 mms��a©®orrmu oas`-'wo®oou m� mv��mvOr:,m-,u.-vo mm�momm�m.-aca o®mm�Ecsm�m�a�mca-�®msv®gym©gym ��-� mmm�m0oom�mm�m 000®omooc�mmvE-R-wum©gym momp�m m�.�momos�o m®mommam�omomm m0ma�ammsmm�`-.moo®��m ®mmo_ J' Key Utility Qomiop Q Mr. Y. - nz. ® tr sro - wF.4 r MT . en.w m n• no - amw O71 r sM - w)m r SMI . ee.s N' Ero . emA w-Ir w-ssr CEI N Sm . ael.w r YN - fR90 ® N• 5ro - em9e r MT - Y).L w-]tl rr-AS• m xsro.enm ®rsM-mass r wr - eely 1r sro . e!]µ pf-Sr 6-iY tr sro - ex.m rur - m.w ® rsM-mlb ® rui-nau »•sm..11 rs.N. mare STY ,cm .T r-eum ur-aLF wx.N xnvFR M ro wnls W I -e' ®M. it 510_mSw Q 'rM_51 n.a 3rSm. m1n M-nr .. q-1Y r T-Y610 rur - ewa. �rAr Se of - u FIEVAMNS WhO M WAIfA. Sldel MN LMTMY M6 Ai M MQi M. MYorzs neAR4x2 eEnm rPFs/YAu \� IETMwO WL V S1CR4 wRR 0.T0 \ +\ ----------- VSEEESr Legend t7d t� MGVERT LINE [A9mR VIE das A1d alma eAwTM. sRER awrMr sss Ema YAn SIWI 4MER uIp YM x.M4li 111mYWI0 E1F[TEC OM]eEAp ¢ECLMc IgFCMWY RBfa rom VHE RfN9W MAN TIE arz vu1E rwEn dxl srnw (a1N RPRM) upr PdE vpvpl own 3FPAR.NIIM � r® NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION W b Nv CORER STATE TALE ONE E CALL T. ulr N.. u1-. .V ra r� 1-eoo-uue-nN General Utility Notes M CgI1WLTA 6 SFE61f Y CWlxxd TML M LOG1xN B /W� EIEVATdI M EpnNO UR1T6 49 Slgwl PI MSE RMIS MF .\YD IELQM IF M VIAg11 UTIIIY CdiMFS MO WI(D IEASIREIEIR iN2M x M fRO. M MWIkMx 91ILL 110T Z IAI(D a M FMIC Fun M mmE¢ M m.RAenw 91AIE wsr ewsnxc camas RmR m axsnxlrnM Aw xom M O.FA re pMEFP M dSOmNN£4 1. I1L SMRMY SAFR. SIOY YRA AIO WI.1ER YNI YOTNIATIM4 91/.LL BE Rx YMIAJIiA 0.W WL COM MO N /LLOOYx2 wTl M OMFN' EOTp 6'STMANFI 9FOeGT01K idl MTT YMI MO SRMZ UE MSiNU1M M9 BY 0 Mtt p41ep5 N eEYFR MO STId RBIYIAMeI" M MFP4® M A950GeTp1 M 6 WOE81iA 1 RAT m 06Te1CIpN. M CMTUCIG 91ML IMMI M MFCf3)M. IEnMIi nxrz xo wrx RIYR sa M maosv avN a vOm YIM M QNFR dl pOIfFT TIAT PReIR xAK REII ®iMED. PVML xEs axu s M RFswmun M M m1Inc1M wEm oMRws MMMY1➢ YN M OwfR. .. caxmAca w41 Rg91 m Md.EC11xAL rwrs rM FaAn Mv,np Aw dwx9ws a CCgYA.4 ulr¢ iNId1 vvd¢ omas Malllla vaEx9oxs ua Fun sMa.Ic own re1kEnldl wunal a Au r.nAT uluLxs aloe s wxsTRupp x ArrumAx¢ wM M sFvlunara s M usRQlv.rz vwn mlelRr. M m1nYCIM 944E mooua M sERxEE W[ wxsmcndl wm M v1uR mMMFs 0. COITUCIdI HILL ®)MI IlL MEQ.4MY QIT RIMI$ rP1 VNIY awEcmR Am uluLes 9Yu m eartcLm AIO rwRoxs e. M an. M mr alai s NareEn b-wMs rMaR ro d2waaa wlx M YIFIIY 0141RICTW fR MY IEO.RU TSK W11R/{RN 91M= xn OG/.T: NNAFI[ wM fOFEn M1Y Rif O11ME Te OI )Y Ax. w1p YM Br14ae' ro M aR uxuss our MTIOMD ro ro 9J n M CR. xlr mHAY WIISEg1pLE5 6 m6YID dl vladmllm g9anve• s sax¢ ro M runic Am ro s M Rvaaeurc s M aalmAciM. ). IIARA YM IFNO e M a101N ME MPROAIAM IIGQP(iK IFMUMS ALLp 1q1 Aftl11d1Y RS mp MTAW14 d, 91R3 OR xEX IWA opl2cliolM ME 1Edlmn. M.ad oERErinrR 9WL xm EIS M YAARY REWSENCED r. M rFE YAMEACTRFT ql n ILCAL WHANOIM1FOm M QSMRTIWCeREp mCd6mKT Yx1FR WW n ma1vF vans YW nNusr REsnvnR rtR arr n4nxm IrQINElO1R 9. A Y1Mx g11EAL 4PMATIN d' 10 Nd6 6 REgM® AT Nl MIFa YM Q059MS wTl 54xiMY Ylpl fR Sidx SERR. 16 VT11M1 SINRS i1PIWlr lFRl1/.2 5 qll� 9ELM1' {41 Wf91 aICRrH 9qM ql XnEn. n. Au umr4s 9uu mPlr wIx M mpaEVExR a M air. 12 Ml NM TIES axLL R p1nSF xOl w1lYPro M xSRT11lDE dA4 m wN )d WIW W12R. RMNCE YMYW SIF W A Li 11' fTW lNElwf ZBI ! STRY a:IOE MPM1E YAIFA Y.W E lEE TW! )S' Ci wY; ss NSt1Anp sxN1 BE o0Y' sim6oM M BR1wo ss v1 Ew.I. wM . NCM6 6 TMAiE4 lA SMITM. FETFR NR W RFf Trt BJXGNS FMH16E 91I1L eE P0.YxIR TMdEF( (RT) 9M )S p N. 9R )e R REpM1E0 rdl EB116 QEAnA 5 fEEi. SMLMY 9FVp RiE YMM 5 {FLI ? elA➢NL Mx V WI rOTN6. fR 91RLL S M SP1@IIE b to eldx SYOi PFE 9lLLl 0E RFNrFP® CMOSR iR (DA9 5 rW roF o- ME 1r xo NOM) M a - rm RrF oY1ETrA5 x No Iln m Wass oncRwsF xonn) xm R-4 crsal2 a wrF smR1 SEER M1PE 6 WOFp e. M Cln. IpE snYel W£ 91NL PEEL RFd.E1FNR M ASwm YSµ. 1.vE s wm wArzarlpl wlvEcndls 9[E RM LW L0.'ATIM WERE Rd 6 IEQND. PFC STdb SiEa RR: 914E SE 9JEMlF W RPE. MREo E1O ffllld6 9Wl BF RP wM TI/91 4V/1p5 k RM-RM. te. rosr aauroR v4xs 91Au eF naw r-srn (re mevAW1q YaCwFC nND/!O GmY AIO aLr nMOAIYS vK\E m s YFdWNX ioxrMY RSExr vloa: arz v4N2 roar ro m AAvmA9E rp a rt[r uTA YM FEIIM M EIECIIYK MAIM Swld1 al4L E rMl xp Rl19 IW EQRY4ExTJ. 17. MFII fOti MICIpN i1 CWIFIET. M WNiRAtid 9WL rAI.VF M OMEa wM M A'rSIRL IEONI Ix ULFILY WKMIC1gX. M.\S#M1T aWl Wltf IOWTM RIO IENOM FfxAIIWS M a.WRS ro M VLNI. MRILnx ro 1fAPr YM oMIFR W pOREN NC11EA A PVN wm Rar-manxrnW 6EVAlAM n rEdlm. 1/4 - . I- ML SM III u M wowE o rzR Rx) Yx.: a..o4 wiaoE w W)El .R-RIP 6A4) m MT BM - 1- PIIfMUE 4-1 /3' 55 ANpQ B0.R Y/Qq4 A A xor I wlV R amT1 eM Rm qV.h x) 4ClId5 • Y 6C. }VOI M r "N" Mm v�o)w F. pass e gYF119Ws) V-xORI ® E.Wd If m10 W- 4EYA➢G8 -w]e e r_p rf-Y rF-ru waaaLnl wW O ro m`ndu A -A . ".� qIT FIEVATM xR x'?. AnM-eme r-r vnwr 81M1O1111E rnll ran AW RIS Part Aie06.T[S IxC ST�PUI�4MNa� . iMYluO.uu»io MIE1 Pa9EEEnEs Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 PHASE TWO UTILITY PLAN Ara 2OZemsm CS IW3 OUTLOT A 9AIDN0 YIfIAQ LIE .� \ _ 7 ........... LPI b GOPHERSTATE IE ONE CALL .x N R51-♦SFtlpR I—CRyR IN. itll i— 1-W'.F353-II66 / - \ CAmnal Site Notes ' t 1 ..OR.NO IIFPb ATM 1. M5 VNaECi MOKf➢ Bl 11f5lRCM ) FPC{EmW.L 4ANfES M,,A. .w owi s a wu r w Ir. 92 GWXMNS NO U1.11Y LMAll06 NWi TO �VATIOI NE fwm. x n i f sb wmn rm.mr.rxus s. 16iFA TO ai10Mf 9RXr PM LOT EMPCR L.alBaN4 ND .NA1. ♦ ALL MBOIS ME M FAM T OJIB M EYTgf 1. OF BACNG . LNffi ana11RH IpRO. s. R3W TO MOfRC1LMK RIx6 PM EYALI 9U.1AXf pxp9O5 NU .TO,M Of FE15. nNP3. M!0 UNIX vC0.S a .0 OM R NE . E ♦.o PEE] Il0 P.R 6 OAB) INFSS onus Mea ]. NL aw N4 A , 9Mll S "I, 1NFS onEnH IMIV➢. a x WxIMCIOx 9WL EE RE9gR9F Ea N1RpxG NU uMIRMRMG nw]e EaaIL arm axM As I]RNLAo¢ YweMc Sala pAECMyK 9a6. PI/®6 MO L,allro LalIP2 x I,ALL K R 1R.rit nIH[ I�AIIY. AI6101* R xR\]m aWl a AIPWd er x an NO EMiIFER MA ro PIAaINR. ERMII[ :`�� wllln aAlm aI.LL IArWI ro umwNe aoor srAAasoa l' I. aRYNW9 PAtOEIr MO QIIOIIF Sc1. TO a N .6Pm.W2 NM M aLWEO.lIcm OP x a02aNIGLL ENDImL - �♦,• a In 1 AM TAM TO PARLAY M�Ns NC!£�lTO .FAO T, i' oAu.a ro Aormrt PRaPEnlEa i xr 11. alE 1% M a Ppl R6Wlla Mr. 16En m WIlN4 I T PVN PIEPIAD WY n oMERs PM alE uMxxc mAes .ro NnlalEla¢ All T _ L IE]INF MIL_ pTCGP!➢M?'bn_ _-- --- la rx avlNWs mA MO rI LOC PMBERIx -I )I I \ I i �I ♦ ♦ LOT 1 ®.WJ tl M.sE ME lI1fAL I EFE — e94.3 , 7 nr ✓ / x �IETAlMO rAu ! JkNA OUTLOT B �x I a b i h C SiM Upend O Site Retails — ®Y eIv oIN. WiIEP L YWNTIBIF LLnB k p,l1ER -- -- L(I111E LOT ♦ ale Na. b1T1ER 4R/AtLK 5 [xiLYNWSpgp F/.SxIENi ✓lE L NRMN aII µY.'J a Nle MD MfIEA d �OA AXO aTIQ1 - Ppa XMYAL NA M Lf\El p PRIVATE aYYIEIE SOENµy ISI.WNU nA, 10 PRESIPoMI aNB RNP ,Q' iEN¢ 1 AERStE ORMgy pEEESMM RALV Q' OiaE2 .,0AV,1 �x a1f65 NMR S11�NL �s ewMAR�r anlyXWs oA_a-sAc LvxvalE sm.IA _ IEAW WT' allY1W5 PA4Llx11 15 P rt0 $Typ gr. NO 31Cp yp Pos] BA4 MRYL BUTT 6IU 1 PA.1 SiAaPC 16 xx uL\Nl Q Nll®t V PMN S14LS �E RIfII 3nN= R 1WE J RI}y.LLk p Mlwsrnlw 11 eauANo # � 9e lA1nN4 x0 PArLEXT SFCnMs o x1 anAN�YI�..L • pUEEn paE aaL♦m / NAr Sigoege and Striping Notes 1.1. . LO1 S.. 9VLL (E ♦' NOE CLLM NYIE M LOI.R 0i PA:L. ANNL WIA.CIIN SXNL PNIt NR/NL a2CMNK 1RY]% A6UY5 A$ 9.tYP1 N NOIE IIRI N.3). 3 ACQS51&L 1. AD. CNE RAl1N.c]M y1N1 P.XT ALL A.. VA AC(£S901F L. Ally p1O55 WIIN A.LL LOAM6 . Nnl InK P. ., ... P.'.T I. ,L ALL sM5 sXN1 Nally Phi. CVIaaR F. G9YC NE1R aWXEn. oMaEe uwc 8W1®N Lounoxs Nay PAs Is xol PRaeceA ar MRn. ♦ PAII1( WAR) RISn TIE $1CP SIM IOGTM. ARIMYIN CL mtll aasYnr3R .0 `0 M suu c+rtw mW aREcnMK IPN . a1YRxl LM6 TO ME R♦N. S ALL 9M94ALTHE6 5 L a W R It ®MD nB.Q MRB MLL11 ORMOAM No1En. i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m Sign legend Mdu to MnDOT Details) eutbm¢ sa INwE�svienrN SI SIW 9:N yfYW M-1 a3 XNOY'V .Ca78iE 1r Y Ir n-y S3 NO PMMO Ir Y Ir RYA S♦ 00 NOl dla 3a Y 3r 16-1 SS flil aE M] Ef Y 3r M-YI SS RFID 911 IP E M-] S] XNMO YMi Rn It S It lr Y♦-2 Sl INI] nIN 4Me ESa R3_EI SY NM] IME MA] lYN IIM] W R 3a R)1Qw SIO PmF51RI.W M01910 }Y R SY W rX-2-I Slt InID N' R H' M-3 I M �— W W Ia 1W NOT FOR CONSTRUC ON PaAE As3auTxs lxE S?.PA�uLMN,,IwA�il. iAnaYx..a.lw UNIEEIPROPERTIES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 W :. rA.LNona �� PHASE ONE CRU SITE PLAN Yiia ]al>1Nm rk UT lYY 'IM 9�[ C6 PLANT SITHIMIIEE em arc mraAorslaaN: v ® w.veswsr -Too NN Y Y PUMIM NEE7 uimaas w°O1fN'nvw .mei.w,; 1-.x.lz.°00.]. a wwri °wM wnnws s roams s Mnrt wzwn a aersi m rm .sp arz manoxa ivxx eu E emx.m wm e. v.osW uo menrcnw ws m avzsro x ns .rm.rz ron aorz een"�xasart ra'm �n rE um.wz Ymnu.r row rY salm w ... m YOM uwrzm a a.ms wiiY .�m.vi a v rEn`irn.'i"R.n`acfA6 w rK rwua]w* Rur wmwe aw. rm wE . x rue auunrs aaexwp w R..wuc arvu.n m E atwo� w.oe v.m..-aoa .Yogi xYM sews w.vr aYu .w� m .l a a a.n iii a ms�rna nuowa Ys RSr; props, suR [m MIMR a1N1 E fRE faOl Y]1RIHE WS Mr6 w r6wY.6 ML Ir.NR 9YLL E .R[ 1101 Mp w ¢/rz Nxp6 �e��w¢ww%.aEm wa .u"�'�`xp.�rnnros+n wm a.p�nz Raw.crrs wp ¢dam Lre[ sETlw, nfa (Ym na.-mw w pn arui.wax) wY1R m E r6ixzm .s rw Slrpxm .Ye R.w1Ya n.cros rsurs aYu E am.mr rvxpa uW ew..e a aE MESMr Mn-x waxz r mszY�*. .Bqun ol.. row .m o wpu a m wmeua rms wi w rwim rvxx sur xp ra .roar ar rom rerp Run u Easwr - Mn swpum s.rem. rnur¢ uP ro awEcr va eruare nxop w .raw awFW Mrmnw. n.re uo np r.n n..e riw ae .roc WY9'M 0 'LMnpM IMY .Pw�rtC Iw in � � al wrlpWxR � uo uv E� m a mw zn rmc v xm.z mms vm rxw x rw. aurae rl3 - rw usn saw / � w mli ]c' ac ®+ Ixnw saw w.[ ®arncv ram .' s armYv ewx.paa�Yi r 40v orYr xxnxew amp IEpp 1 �!. —i- puum�nW mcri�c rzmo s� ma�w..rio /� ti/�n —A Sly � eu�p r¢. c E.Yi� ®ia a sr s.e , xum.aY M.Y. ume.w, F1�i are. 3lr —te�67- ura area ep sorwus rw maxc Eup r®c row wu v armn xempm w Yu. aYu a u� upp .Y s .n.� vs rmc sr - sr.e , tro s� sm, �wxummm w sua . rry aYu E mvm a rot wxms ®s mrmr m spnwz � - RnbY aurt0.® "— as rs - row eYwse , vax�m a..irn sn.awa ®.]sum E Yelmp CI MMI 9RERYLE 16i m.Wllle3 M M EMzrl 61 e6CVMc.. weep ma ]ss anw m rm.n r.anm mwvs us mmYmn rerxr wiewns a sirt um us rm s.YYmmm.rt nwrmnz EYMgESa w na ins w ssm. • Ipmr3 EVSMM RerR rGrp ON r m Z Y rw q T%W wr semmm xras m E m® uam omaas xvrm m uw rmr. aura uo x.lp. WYA9 .6 /LL E Rn1® rIM f 6 N9M1 Yp R.®m RSIO.L EaE .m was mw.¢ iw¢ v i w x,.an auu E mum as xws u aww a riw E.x wlmr s®v m (wms p rw amp..s..p Raw m W. . WW.sm m.mIDp1iw�Enma i w vm, saw w rwvxc rmas reecmw1 m .Y Reim np smm rweu w arz m nm .sE wlnoi � w >w a rvxrta. u ®ate w � irc I.xeraR mxwc.w910w..vwewan way E`Ywr�we rp.nr rw .rY.w.. xn.wmi w ruin snex w woana uon rm.Yu.a nw pmrr¢ uR E m.lm raw rF mu.. aRrr.crw. w wAuiax m.ei awsM...rzn w orw�r x..MY-.sa i. rm`anKrms rwy rn amw 9.E ous a rmYE sm/� u Eawn rw w. maw. m.sruo uue .w.e„r m x 1E mN® Y..ei W6neCAN. W Y xw. T WOGI SPE DATA 60PIQt STATEATE ONE ONE Gill cevr mane am .R w. is re i-eao-nz-nw znnac c.xYR. ma.s a an - m.en s. (mq waPasn nwror ma.¢ m w.lYw. m sns - u..]n s ("A unoPr rmvu¢ asaM®a ssrt - .mwe s (mq sermr]w atY eulrixrem 'e- u� ix curuuiexz .arms svesv.m (o a M.amn Ysn) - Lm v mrn pvMioaY nrss aauEn - .Y min vmoaiwY irr6 Eamn - n �'' .ws wi vrccrze exxpes Tan umsas lOT4 SMe� RWFU - S /GT. _ xp xxp.awr rm as9. xar ])s (wr-a�E) V.s Ewntn WM) - sn V. =a �'miss'iLLxas rEmraeus wos�s w M miu PfASR}IY TF£S ISwI®- zz M'z wYOz emzy a m.¢ r (Yx.) eYA m4.p. SfWp ImR m E z'.z' mik a MU y 11EF51F m - ]] _ SThwC.V w.Y1RY wi IA miµ SMI85 IEYll®- Y Mp Wp¢ I®L WL NMF .REm .mR Em K WK z¢.tvnuc w �. OidYL M.YR MLtl py�p woxu.fW i m.W psmsimr Hass - m .m .m r°f'�"m . mra row rux. min vewsma..ssrs - w min swm - n .n rw r sew wmwo aux. - awn. Rnn nr xm sMmc emu ax. wr m uo ecnw m xse. imu w ppux siuoup ra rowan. ELpY M 1/YY BNl ffi. w Ir011.® 99 w m:.� � p.p wm.i Lfn1 uMu Ipeorc ..x Mom aE w.oc TREE DETAL mt oNnrR seid w5r a mr.nm a row wmr awes wmw wpu.r .a. n.ea alms .0 Rwrxa Em auu EmE r E xwxe Wi era ..p ®aYaa r.arr. �E�rEY`mu®wimu ma EMIX)EEN DETAL fIO. t06 IIp eW.m16 xnE emu ruu m Eix amr aurae mx artmcnsarruars w w s os x�"n a .cr�ie iw i an R.wr f f0 witTG B.Ye 1 RAV. Rl MM aE6ID BmLL Al I pea uo mnw E xac w YMbx S.YOW M MRSEII. :'uvJpan Im +. Ywc.n Seau_1nMe$ ya�wm¢ Pm Cnon�o.un, xinrieso'.o XS XehE Mm'. r e.y `seY� n - ,en . e �s� 9'e.nrt•.rn ub e1c. mm. Ym 3 - YceYccrte_ 1-.gel �5 p m' .m Teo NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Pon Assoarirslxc SE... PME M4 i P.we MN........ Pi.uuu+n.u.a or UNITED PROPERTIES Powers Crossing Professiond Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 iMaaae tlr� PHASE TWO LANDSCAPE PLAN Ll RANT SCHEDULE Crt OYOIIb[ AI YIIt 6 ®t� 9I1 - •L Y Y bow -i6 r91 - /uMw � 1 Y Is YY.4. ill .EY - Rtl PW WY0 Nra Y 'MO - . Irtlb OY Ww � BW - .9rW WUTme u Y..Yse Pb.Yn' W IMf r Y zwe wl.we �tiY.a s.aa. K Gn H x>we BCp COPIER STALEATE ME OA11 w. r... 1-mo-zsallYc 40T FOR CONSTRUCTION pr ,INITED PROPERTIES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 o.Y4b W v ` PHASE ONE LANDSCAPE PLAN - � r L2 N a n, /� PHOTOMETRIC PLAN -TOP OF PARIGNG RAMP 0 b.o •b,o b.o b.o b.e b.o b.o b.v b.a b.o b.o b.3 b., b., ba b.z to-b.c be bi'b., b.+ b.s b.+ b:+ b, ba bs b.3 b.+ b., b.3 b.2 b.2 b.z t.3 b.3 b.z bz b.z b.x b.z b.+ b., b.3 b.2 b.. b.o b.o b.o b.o b.a b.v I.. b.o b.o b.z 1.1 b.e 1.1 }.v 1.2 1.. l.o I.o 1., },, }.6 Le i:v b.+ b.s b.a b.a b.6 b.s bs b.s t, b.3 b., bo 4.4 t.s La I.. I.z b-, b., b.x b.a b.o b.o b.0 b.+ I.. le Ss S.e S.a L, } } , ]o kw 3k� , b, iz )A 1.9 ].t S.s } s 1.5 %.z 1.6 1s 1.2 1.6 b, b6 l.o }.0 1.6 %.1 4e 1.r be b.o bo t.o b.a b bs 1:c-1:6"SS lo.o�o sS.+ t.e i.z S.e 1a.z�lo.z L6 5o 4.i }.. ksiLLos 3 x 1.a 1.e E., b.o 1s S.o 1.+.L31.s- Y.05;51.3 5.x l.s --; b.a b.a b.o b.o b. - b.o I.a Y.e Y.6 bn S:z�S:o T5.0 1, i.c k.o bs 1., Ss 1.6 I.. I, 9+ I.a Ye 13 E.o lo.26bs b, S.o },3 Lr Sw 1. az b.o b.a b.. b.0 b. }.6 S. 5a 1.6 3n S., S;2 Y+ js 7.1. 5.1 5.0 5.o i.Y1. 1.2 1.14., 1.3 1.e S.s },o 1.2 3 b.o b.a b.o b.o b.o }n i.z M }.e-h.z ?.+ 1.6 1.s S.o S.z le 1.a 1.3 b.a 1.. 1.6 1s 1, b.e b.6 b.o b.v b.a b.o b.aj _ j }.0 %.,I Ita b.s La b., b.6 b.3 b., b.z b.a b.o b.o b.o b.a }.2 1. b.z b.3 b.s b, b+ b, b.3 b.z 9 b.a b.o b.o b.o b.a - }a i, la bs b, b., ba b., bs b.z b.o 1.0 b.0 b.a b.o - },a S.o it, I., i.. 1 s 1 , t + b, b., b.o b.o b.o b.v b.e bb..oasbb..vv 3.o is.li.s }.a Y3 l.e 1, b.s b.o b.o b.o b.o b.o 1.. 1.4 5.3 I.. b.e I., b.o b.a b .s 1.o Ls b 13 b.o b., b., ba b.o b. i9 }.s S., b., i.z E.6 1.3 a 1.0 b.o 3 ICI }, Lz 1.o Sn SA S.v 5.3 S.o Ho 1., b+ b $., b.z b.3 b1.1 b.: ].3 1.6 1.2 1 o.s 1,3 1.+ Ls I., 1., be Sa I.o I.. 1.eb161bs b.1 bz Esb.:�.z b:3 bs b1.2 l}i5.2 S 6 E.+ S.s So 1.2 1.3 %A }.i 1.4 1.6 b.z b+ b.3 b.z b., ib.3 ba b., 1, 'I.3 }., S.2 1.s 5.a 5., }s }_, bs 1.s 1.+ b.+ 1.1 t.o V1 1.3 S"3 I -I b.e Ss %.1 i.e ke la b.c l.+ k.e k.+ 1w Y.e 1.2 1.1 is S.3 4.6 1s 1.3 b.s b.+ b, b.z 2.z J b.v per: bo b., 1.1.. 1.. Sa E.o 1.1 7.2 1.1 Ss }.e 3.o L+ 1., t.i 1., S.o S.a S.a S.z E.6 Ea 1.3 1A },e Ys t.s 1.2 k.z 5.0 ]s 3.a 5a 1, t.a T:e S.o S., }.o L, l.v b.+ b.. bs b.2 b.2 g2 b.3 b.s 1.0 }0 1, Ss l**,+ §.3 5.0 Y.6 Sa S.s h,z 1.2 1..0 E.3 Ss 5.2 S.2 1+ i.3 7.0 1.3 So 1a )A 1.1 b., is 1.1 S.a S.o S.o 14.2 3.a k.a ]a 1.+ 1.a Ls 1.1 bA b:6 b.3 b.z b.3 z b.3 bs. by }a S.i t.s 1.a 5a 1.1 }.3 SA %A So i.e Ss 5.2 Sw 1.6 1.1 }n 1.2 S.+ 1.+ ]n Sa I.. 5.+ E.o ]n S.+ So S.z 1., Ss 5.3 S.o }o 5.0 },e 1.+ b.e b.3 b.2 ba $ 1.3 b.s hs 1.6 L, 5.3 1.1 is 1.1 Y.c 3a 5.+ V. i.z i.r 5s in 3.+ 1.0 1.2 b., §.a S.a 14.6 Y.o 1.+ §.+ b6 Ss i.> in i.z 1..6 S.e §.3 in S.a'].6 3.+ 5.3 is S.z b.e bw ba b., b.v b.3 b.s 'v.v 3.3 S.o t.a 5, k.6 S.o 1.3 ].a 1,2 LJRvv iE.s E.o $., 5.o"Y:i 5.+�e1i 63 +.o 1.R- .-) 1.3 _}.OSB+ 5a ]o 5., S.a S.e B�3�o5.z i.z ].e 5.+ab.3 t+ ]s 1.. bs ba ba b., b.2 b.+ I }.+ }.3 1.+ 1.5 1.1 }., %., Le 5., 1., 1.. 1.6 1_.2 1a ia, 1.2 1.o 1-3 16 11 S.s 1.e 1.3 1.9. 1.1 1.? 5.+ }., S.e 1.0 id., E.6_1,e 1.2 b., b.2 R ba b.3 b.2 b.3 D.s '.. _.. _. -. is 1a la b:3 1.. 1.0 1.. 1.. 1.2 b.. b.+ b.+ b.e la 1., I.. b.e b.+ ba bn 1.2 1.3 1.. b.e b.+ b.+ b.a 1.3 1.2 b.e 1.. 5.e 1.2 1.4 1., 1, b., b.z ba b.3 b., 1.2 b.3 b., b.6 b.6 b.6 b.6 b., b, b.s b., b, b.6b6 bs b., b,pb.3��b/p.+ b s h.s ^ e b.3 b.3 D.3 b., b.s b.s b., b.3 b.3 b.3 b.s b.s b.s b.6 1.0 1.3 Ss }A 1.2 b., ba ba b.o b.z 1.z b., b.2 b.2 b.3 b.3 ba b.3 b.3 b.3 b.3 b.3 b"3 ba bs b.3 b.2 bS Q'T.• S LVD.D 2 1.2 b.a 1.2 b.3 b.z b.2 b.2 b.2 1.2 b.z b.3 ba b.3 is l.o 1.+ L, b.b b.3 t.a b.; SITELIGHTINGPHOTOMETRIC PLAN ISOMETRIC VIEW oret`. wrw.r.nw m. w.o0osw baa6w�a,b M,Y. �= rtE lIW' rtllG 6COPEN01f8 nr+we aT63rs r> 6rry ,yu6 a97hti r swag Survey, n-Site Lighting &Survey, LLC 763-664-7548 peK, xe. +mo,a6 62fi/1008 ns raotEo .SLAB Concept Sanitary Sewer Plan Powers Crossing Professional Center X P ® Pre ored by NOT FOR CONSMUCITON J Ilnlllln Iullll 11 1 Inlll 1 Illnlllllilllnlllln i nlllllllll n �1� 1 Illnllllnlllnlll n�l�nlllllllll �� u!� 11"�� 11111111111111111�1111111111111111 .1�� i�ll� Ills®11 1111'11�111!"7111E�1111111A111111 IIII�IIIII�IIIIII�III��IIIli�111111=Illlllli��s�i�i�ll�i�snle��n��ll� �i��lll!`I� illll '�1111111111111111111111�11111111111111111L11SIiiili111111111111111111111111111111111111�� . �� 1111111111�IIIIIIIIIIS111llilil�llllllllllllll 1 1111111111111111111111111��!!■■■■--- _-- --- - -_---�...,__==`a��■■ IIIIIIIIIIIIIII�II�l��Ilion■■■■■��■■■■��..___.,__ ��1111�1111� :«��....■��ii.��11Eiii111i11111111111111. - 11`iliei��i�i�i��i11111111111111111111111IN 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111. EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE . I 02W7 10,ateaatl Prslobnal Cdl 46 H.re betas m9ging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Aw 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-600-252-1166 050' 100' 150' Truck Ew,w 09/04/08 6sa i a i I W .�wwww;; I ewY- Turning Movements Exhibit Waltnimd Ga.in6 R amn W Cater MEMO= PX EO EBUR G 120.�2WX Oyp ]R 5 .1fi 116," a CMtl 25TgtY LINX 88.0.0 s1 PNASE ONE TOinL O—will ir rr rr n• �. I ' — OF u. oOT RO. W. 1111LII,f1 TOOWxER PxIGx 9-�-- TO COHSTRUCTpN — �- — PDWERS BLVD. QOVERALL SITE PLAN - PHASE TWO ---� _ t 1 \ \' ` — iiI + 1 \ z i� D q1E 4 +zm:2aon za,DDo.w 3 f1A$ •Tl.WJL • fi LW tl 25TOxV LIHI(' 88 Wp q PNLSE IXIE TO'.t IJ.L1J- STORM WATER POND SEE CNIL DRAWINGS 4 I 1 IM/x STORM WATER POND SEE CNIL DRAWINGS O T� I �� 'I'rf iTI 1 Il i 11I I�LJ� LLL ILI I L LLLLLLILLI-1�-�u'- I1T'1 rr I IOI mUz �JJJJ Llbiftt LLL ' _ - — I..C.TGO _ P Rp,liOy,E _ � Cp01x,F,IDY _ -�-- pOWERSBLVD. --� (11 OVERALL SITE PLAN -PHASE ONE NGx,x PHASE TWO SETE DATA o.m zw.� ornx>: .rnW,alw.t zsr.rz t•-zl >o.K zEawEann .Eaa.a ..a,.Ea z>fi.a,s euala art O�w�z+ 1 sm. Pao art jiv .ems) AOOID BI.M4.4. ,Matl SI. 4RV0i YpF bi„ JS,OR. .T-6 art. xaaxo w.aa..a tM.W m 91E .MOW tOl NtgYY (,SgBIaM Nf Y.tB �xnY� tlaW ax. m»�i uE: rm P.xuxo ,.ueoo ii. .Nma �tea,,,W..a> . ,... • .. m m : 4 PHASE ONE SITE DATA E61xW ZWY [6�M�I. f: 6>iF�i¢IlNllw(4-I�i aa.m x.onm 5 m 5 .�x,arns � ` v ti • $la. IOW as s<. iiv> .GEa) ma. ss. rwWan .Wn.W ,o.> J snv.s .>-r as eua.W mw.0 h,..1 0. n5g.aa ,otµ9 JW .1J a� m P.aaaW vW 5 sFx. P .0 v P.w•MN.sv. k W0si= F.rav,— UNITED PRUPERTIES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 OVERALL PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO SITE PLANS f1y54,UlY 5e, Is II,:P.i~ir�a ql�~ .um.e u R:o u as+rla W Ik\ IR ti.. zGtTFaTdD M• AW OJ1. OM SID fT A2 J —MNDOT R.O.W. LINE T MEW ..NOW ENN NNN... I GEN , i P p P um N" o- I P P1115EONE NDING P •gUIIDINGING AREREA'. BBW] .SF t ¢ •9'OCCUPPNCV 9 •iVPEGFCONSP, KL • s + N 1 - •AUIOMM SIDED Efl '1 -- Sv51EM PNOvioEG i� I WI m v IIIIII1111 pig 1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I — �� LL JJ_LL1 J—I_LLl � L1�YLL1J�n1' I�I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L 11JJ—LLCITY Til — � POWERS fiLW). rl v � NN t i t 1 x� Q�f Q 1 y U I 11 SITE PLAN - PHASE ONE ALE U i =ao NGN,N Pa[AvmN,Es INc ,Fxkov Pnn[D.ry ,Pm4MNnrokana PNNNIurm FM: mn..>,w� UNITEDPREPERTIES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 ENLARGED SITE PLAN PHASE ONE bq uagllalNYl�Ilila� IIiYiN.e kiWle .I iitvl vh lk lsJlk9 �YaLL YLN. W II11A Ick W r�._k ,szzzann krlk oM ;xErl A3 L L r El ( DIRECTIONALSIGNS n MONUMENT SIGN i)M 1/2•=1'4r a r��`� M 1/4•=1'-0• U 1H6�7'-0' J SOUTH ELEVATION M a r r r LM1IZ� @RST ELEVATION (1 NORTH ELEVATION U v1a=r-o r w Port /moarm plc SEocvPueDerrt r PrLMNanwvr Pxr ev Purreees Afflk pp URI`9 -]c ER71ES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 BUILDING ELEVATIONS PHASE ONE r rerr o.se�er sr oaoia � .�a� un'iry Ir nip P•.+elnrl... �ea.re.w�e. rnenm rIr r rvr xa i:ir o- r ri u� 9i� n ara r .aw awra narzoroo WEST ELEVATIONELEVATION M 1'-0" e r yr Y If 11_-11 1111-- - 11 11 11 11 :mail 11 11 11=- -III I u- IF -11 11 11` 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 II II II 11 :� 11 II 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 II 11 11 II 11 11 -11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 ■I■1■1■ �I� 11 II 11 II 11 11 11 11 11 II 11 11 II 11 11 11 11 II i 1 5 i i i i�llai=- - a-- �- i�l5 i i11 II- if IN i i m 1 11 11 11 II = 1111 11 11 11 11 �� II 11 11 11 - 1111_-11 A 11-_11-ME=- 11 1-1L 11 I�� ■I■I■I■ � 11 If 11 Y.61Y. Y MIY (a \ NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION vt6-=ram n WEST ELEVATION �e 116 IT O voE..c Pu D..,�E 5*.N. MN nro.nm F.(-, .— UMItEU EAilES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 PARKING GARAGE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE TWO YVYWr: VY3WnW by O.M® SI�GT A6 NORTH ELEVATION J r t ffm li -7. J L,DIW D-aw- Ael {sf el WM 4 9l/rOM/I /�Z IiY1M( uavyq le M rmfv pR Y..p{ 0� Csnlµ 4 vvv.ap Mel �ptg MUn Y]mrvly Ayvrm( el I�v�vlvlLr qYf{.y-!1 {bl Ne - o Ine pbl Inv.a/. ._ . well.. q ro.ws aomc mvrmwu alrze. it NOT FOR CONSTRUCITON nevdopm t s ua nay a'r. aa. I: eze oom wl w- raros �« Mi Qo xmlr o- .r aorc." nu'I ro.r.e z..� r:la. oaral .,q .$CG Y.lae! Rel�i.a 9.Me. 4 G M Mu.. Mi CORER STALMEE ONE U'YL Tw. rnr ... ml-urn r. sa r.. l-eoo-ax-llZ i ------t I r I i I I r — J I l rBGMo O • ....per. a ..ro. w. O e. • --- • O o.ar. Gr e.. uw...r rww Port=Dp iu IxC Sr.�. MPNl+no.su UNITED PNUPEA11ES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 PRELIMINARY PLAT S. C2 �u7 \ NNDOT R.O.W. LINE r ♦♦O ----------- _I--I---- .MMMM 4% 1 ♦I � Illllllillil'Il I _ � I � P � P I � P $ ; P •eunraarw hhAAA9F I - .urto+uncvn..crn I.r.' srara Awoo® I ' W I I�IIII I II,I u _ 1 1 I91 I I I I I I I H • II �- U I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �en a�� —.._ .—..� Z �� 111111111 TI''IT I'1 1'I 1 1 I U I I I I I I I I /� —_ I I_J---4-�-1_I I_Yt-1-y--T I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 LL1J-I-LL1J_I-LL1_ =L1=_I_=11J=LL1=J — PEW— LL1J_LL F184�a' IIIIIII Ili /It / J NET II I, I�-II II 1 1JJ-L 1I J-I_L11J-I-LLB _ - - — - — - — - - POWERS BLVD. - e rc 71) SITE PLAN - PHASE ONE w, r = ao• Nax+N UNITED � EAVES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 ENLARGED SITE PLAN PHASE ONE m Mbld.: urswMrae ow+ae I btll ml�l/ iM 116.M call ldi�,� �e t TTd11��e � I d e.�h�iltMl hl,l� hOdd hiv it le d tY 4ie d 6eL. Y M, +uln IIeJ. IMI �eY6. 1.72.. SFff£f A3 J F I P(>PE 1?C)NVEFtS CROSSING A R C H I T E C T S POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108-5118 PROFESSIONAL CENTER PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 POWERS BLVD CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Powers Crossing CITY SUBMITTAL SET I I professional Center City Submittal VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX •=ISSUDSHEET TITLE SHEET Q =SHEEET ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY MAP, DIRECTORY =PREVIOUS PACKAGE SHEET INDEX w N Issues and Revisions: EXCELSIOR • City Submittal Set 04-01-09 m V� bZ GENERAL 0 It Al TITLE SHEET / MAP / DIRECTORY / SHEET INDEX • for 494 CIVIL/LANDSCAPE Cl EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY • ai s1z C2 PRELIMINARY PLAT • o C3 PHASE TWO CIVIL SITE PLAN • SITE E 0. PIONEER TRAIL C4 PHASE TWO GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING AND • LOCATION- o EROSION CONTROL PLAN I 1V C5 PHASE TWO UTILITY PLAN • 1 hereby certify that this plan,specification,or zrz C6 PHASE ONE CIVIL SITE PLAN • report was prepared by me or under my di rect LI PHASE 2 LANDSCAPE PLAN • supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed MINNEsoTA RIVER L2 PHASE 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota, • SU PHOTOMETRIC PLAN • got CONCEPT SANITARY SEWER PLAN • Jon R. Pope CHASKA SHA•PEE TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENTS EXHIBIT • Date 04/01/09 lie. No. 13041 ARCHITECTURAL Commission No. 75372-07230 A2 OVERALL PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO SITE PLAN • Drawn by AW NORTH A3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN - PHASE ONE : Checked by DM A4 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - PHASE ONE A5 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - PHASE TWO • A6 PARKING GARAGE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - PHASE TWO SHEET Al PT., NOm DIN TYPE 8573 '24" Bur Oak 8574 26" Bur Oak 8575 28" Bur Oak 8576 21"...... Bur Oak 8577 '12" IBur Oak 8578 28"__.... Bur Oak 8579 26" Bur Oak 8580 15" Bur Oak 8581 29" Bur Oak 8582 7 _. [astern Red Cedar 8583 20 Bur Oak 8584 16 Bur Oak 8585 21 Bur Oak 8586 '7" Eastern Red Cedar 8582 15" Bur Oak 8588 8" Eastern Red Cedar 8589 13" Bur Oak 8590 37" Bur Oak _.. 8591 123' -Bur Oak 8592 21" Bur Oa k....... 8593 11.1Bur Oak 8594 23" .Bur Oak 8595 23" Bur Oak 8596 35 Bur Oak 8597 20 Bur Oak 8598 13 Bur Oak 8599 aa^ Be, Oa k....... 8600 17 Bur Oak „8601 15 American Elm 8602 19" Bur Oak 8603 23"...... Bur Oak 8604 71 Eastern Rod Cedar 8605 T 8608 11.1 Eastern Red Cedar Bur Oak 8609 28' Bur Oak _ 8610 10" Eastern Red Cedar _ 8611 I10" En, Earn Red Cedar 8612 10" Eastern Red Cedar 8613 '19" IBur Oak 8614 19" I Bur Oak 8615 8" Eastern Red Cedar 8616 12" En stern Red Cedar 8617 131,Eastern Red Cedar 8618 I'llEastern Red Cedar 8619 10" : Eastern Red Cedar 8620 12" Eastern Red Cedar 8621 21 Bur Oak 8622 18" Bur Oak 3623 20 Bur Oak 8624 14" Bur Oak ,8625 14 Bur Oak 8626 11" Bur Oak 8622 15" Bur Oak 8628 19" Bur Oak 8629 32' Bur Oak 8632 '. 21" Bur Oak 9633 29"......_ Bur Oak 8634 z 27"_..... Bur Oak 8635 11" I Redwood 8636 27" Bur Oak 8637 17' Bur Oak 8638 21" Bur Oak 8639 22 Bur Oak 8640 11 Rock Red Elm 8641 '.22" Bur Oak 8642 20".. Bur Oak 8643 20"...... Bur Oak - 8644 14"....... Bur Oak 8645 25" Bur Oak 8646 11" Eastern Red Cedar 8647 18" Red Oak 8648 17"....... Smoak 8649 14" Bur Oak 8650 IT IBur Oak 8651 10" American Elm 8652 ,23" Bur Oak 8653 26" Bur Oak 9654 26' Bur Oak 8655 42X" Red Oak 8656 48X" Basswood 3657 30" Red Oak 8658 13" American Elm ....... _ 8669 '10" jHackberry 8660 13X" American Elm 8661 21"....... Red Oak 8662 35".. _... Red Oak 8663 '16" iBur Oak ' r 0 ............ S".I11P _-...._- - ..... 0 BUSH/SHRUB CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE � WETLAND 0 STEEL/WOOD POST O SIGN-TRAFFIC/OTHER SIGN-7RAFFIC/OTHER RZI MAIL BOX HANDICAPPED STALL C PERC 7EST uw MONITORING WELL ® CABLE TV BOX CURB & GUTTER g ACCESS CONTROL CONCRETE SURFACE L ._�_ J GRAVEL SURFACE sQ STORM MANHOLE 0 TELEPHONE BOX Q TELEPHONE MANHOLE ® TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX STREET LIGHT r-. GUY WIRE 10' POWER POLE ❑E ELEC7RIC BOX ELECTRIC METER ELECTRIC MANHOLE ® ELECTRIC TOWER (ds SANITARY MANHOLE co SEWER CLEANOUT ® BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN ® CATCH BASIN ® FLARED END SECTION BITUMINOUS SURFACE GATE VALVE HYDRANT WATER METER HAND HOLE TRAFFIC LIGHT -GAs- GAS LINE -POH- POWER OVERHEAD -PUG- POWER UNDERGROUND -sAN- SANITARY SEWER -ST0- STORM SEWER -TOH- TELEPHONE OVERHEAD -crv- CABLE TV -TUG- TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND 0 SOIL BORING Q WATER MANHOLE ® WELL ❑s CURB STOP BOX -WAr- WATERMAIN GUARDRAIL DECIDUOUS TREE LINE -x- FENCE LINE o- RESTRICTED ACCESS o Denotes Iron Monument Set • Denotes Iron Monument Found Qi Denotes Cast Iron Monument Found e 2008 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 TREE INVENTORY PT NO. DIA TYPE _.... 8664 I'llBur Oak 8665'- 18" ;Bur Oak 8666 26 : Bur Oak 8667. 1,1 'Ironwood 8668. 29 Bur Oak 8669; ill,Sugar Maple 8670 13 Eastern Red Cedar 8671 10 Amerman Elm 867216 Eastern Red Cedar 86731 31XII renwaed 8674: 20.1Bur Oak 8675 30X Hackberry 8676 10 Sll. EmY Elm 86)]'. 10" '.Sugar Maple 8678 10 Amerman Elm 867916" Red Oak 8680. 25 Bur Oak 8681 ill, Slippery Elm 8682 21X American Elm 8683' 23X" American Elm 8684 I'llRed, Norway Pine 8685' IT, Cottonwood 8686. 101, z Green and White Ash 8682 12" Hackberry „ 8688 101, Bespatter 8669 11 Bur Oak 8690'. 23 : Bur On k 8691 25 Bur Oak 8692 23 Bur Onk -„ 86931 39" : Bur Oak _.. ' 8694: '10" :American Elm 8695 32 RadOak 8696 21 White Walnut 8697 12 Aspen 8698 11 Aspen 8699. 1V Aspen 8700 10" Aspen 8701....._ 12" Aspen ........ 8702: 126" Bur Oak 8703 19' Bur Oak 8704. 17':Bur Oak 8705z 22 Bur Oak 87O6 11.1Red Oak 8]0] 24 Bur Oak 8708. 11" =American Elm 8709 101, Sugar Maple 8730 14 Green and White Ash„ 8711 "I Eastern Red Cedar 8712 37 Eastern Red Cedar 8713 :33X Eastern Red Cedar 8714 12 Ironwood 8715. 44X Bur Oak 8716 '21 -Bur Oak 8717 28' Bur Oak 8718 ',33 Sugar Maple - 8719. '33" Sugar Maple 8720 123 Bur Oak 8721 '39.1Bur Oak 8722 33 Bur Oak 8723 26" Bur Oak 8724 18" Eastern Red Cedar 8725 '26X . Eastern Red Cedar 8728 29 .Bur Oak 8729 '28 Bur Oak 8730 '8' Eastern Red Cedar 873121" Bur Oak 8732. I'llBur Oak 8733 22 Bur Oak 8734 d9' Sugar Maple 8735 I'llBur Oak 8736 '22" Bur Oak 8737 I10 Eastern Red Cedar 8738 '13 Eastern Red Cedar 8739- 119" 'Bur Oak 8740 124 Bur Oak 3741 '30 But Oak 8742 125 .Bur Oak 8743: IT, Bur Oak 8744 126 -Sugar Maple 8745 10 Eastern Red Cedar 8746 I11.1Eastern Red Ceda r 8747 I'llEastern Red Cedar 8748 11 Eastern Rod Cedar 8749 34 Bur Oak 8750. 26" 'z Bur Oak 8751 '10" Eastern Red Cedar 8752''. 30" Bur Oak 8753', 28' Bur Oak PT. NO DIA 1YPE 8756 23 Bur Oak 8757 '19" Bur Oak 8758 20"....... Bur Oak 8759 24" Bur Oak 9760 24"._..... Bur Oak 8761 31"...... Bur Oak 8762 10" Eastern Red Cedar 3763 26"...... Bur Oak 8764 11.1_. Eastern Red Cedar 8765. IS" Red Oak 8766 10 Red Oak 8767 11 American Elm 8768 10 Red Oak 8769 11" IBur Oak 8770 26 Bur Oak 8771 '10" American Elm 8772 31 Bur Oak 8773 10 Hackberry 8774 13 Easter n Red Cedar 8775 31' Bur Oak 8776 24' Bur Oak 8779'. 123" Bur Oak 8790 31"....... Bur On k........ 8781 10 Siberian Elm 8782 14 Eastern Red Cedar 8783 12 Siberian Elm 8784 17" : Eastern Red Cedar 8785 IT'_Eastern Red Cedar 8786 101.Eastern Red Cedar 8787=. ID" : Eastern Red Cedar 8788 17' Eastern Rod Cedar 8789 14 Eastern Red Cedar -- 8790 29 Bur Oak 8791 11.1_. Siberian Elm 8792 14 Eastern Red Cedar 8793. 14" Eastern Red Cedar 3794 11" Eastern Red Cedar 8795 10" Eastern Red Cedar 8796 12" Easter n Red Cedar 8797 10" Easter n Red Cedar 8799 10" Eastern Red Cedar _..8799 10"Slippery Elm_ 8800 11 Basswood 8801 11 Hackberry 8802. 14" i lronsamd 9803 34"....... Basswood 8804 12 American Elm 8805 17" American Elm 8806 20x"..... Ironwood...... ..._.... 8807 34"_._____ Bur Oak 8808 11.1Bur Oak 8809 32 Bur Oak 8810 30' Bur On ... 8811 10" Eastern Red Cedar 8812 21"=Ber0ak 8813 37' American Elm 8814 26X Amer can Elm 3815'. 23" Bur Oak 8916 29 _ Bur Oak 8817 29' Bur Oak 8818 '30" IBur Oak 8819 10 Hackberry 8820 27"....... Bur Oak 8821 10"....... American Elm 8622 31 Bur Oak 8823 '10" Slippery Elm 8824 10"......_ Basswood 8825 10"_...... Basswood 8826 11"._..___ Basswood 8827 34" Bur Oak 8828 14" Ironwood 8829 14"....... Ironwood " 8832 10..... _. Aspen __..... 8813 10"....... Aspen _ 8834 10 Aspen 8835 14" ` Eastern Red Cedar 8836 15.Eastern Red Cedar 8837'. 10" 'Rod Oak 8838 18X Basswood 8839 11" Slippery Elm 8840 19"....... Bur Oak 8841 33 Bur Oak 8842 24" 'Bur Oak 8843 17"_.. Bur Oak 8844 11.1Eastern Red Cedar Legal Description Outlot A, BUTTERNUT RIDGE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat, thereof Carver County, Minnesota. General Notes Existing utility information provided by MNDot drawings dated 2114106 I %=M�M!!!l 0' 50' 100' 150' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108.5118 PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 V � U `a > Is' ' i't 4E \ iv K I ! t N Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 I hereby cerlify that thla plan was prepared by all to under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed LAND SURVEYOR under the lam of the State of AfttttresoEa Mark R Selo Data 04/01/09 Lkense No. 43933 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, NIN 50" PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-SM TOLL FREE 1-888-937-5150 YftstWOOf: wiew.weawoodpscom Issues and Manson,: 0710105 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 0105108 PER CITY COMMENTS Iff@TBC0LINES& STORK PER CITY NOI109 CITYSUBMTPTALSET EXISTING CONDITIONS & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Commission No. 75372-07230 ormm by - Checked by - SHEET Cl 20061094.01EXP01.dwg L- �,2 - -T 1 � / I- V V z— i 1� �on,ramP) o h 312 4� SOUTH QUARTER CORNER H� SEC 23, TWP. ;.116, RGE. 23-�\ �� I —SOUTH LINE OF SEC. 23, s23.27 TWP. 116, RGE 23 S89 °58'27"W 2177° 55 `�------ - 19.9 \ r --- - --__ - i g p `` • -� / NORTH LINE OF ADDITION OUTLOT A,IADDITI' N•L316 --- ,�a5' DEL�TATEO / BUTTERNUT RIDGE ON AND 57l <1033'1 L / / \ �i �Y-PRIMARY BLUFF CREEK SURVEY LINE OF i OVERLAY DISTRICT LINE _ / / ,' POND PER PLAT ii PROVIDED BY THE CITY \ ~1 09/0/08 ./ \ q , J SEWER EASEMENT Lin OUTLOT / I o 1 T1 O �-POND ELEV. 899.7 PER / PLAT AT OF BUTTERNUT 1 / RIDGE ADD177ON GK CO O 6� 359,689 sfit 8.26 It 20" DRAINAGE UTILITY EASEMENT 88.2 257 4. ......,:, ... I � ..... 778 8 O a 1b36 1.18 ac ro II miF II SOUTH LINE OF OUTLOT A, BUTTERNUT RIDGE ADDITION 4,487,987 sf 103.03 ac NORTH LINE OF THE N 112 OF THE NE 714 OF SEC. 26, TWP. 116, RGE 23 A N87033'46"W N81° ,-146.58-, _-_ 5526"{y 298.,24 S01 °25'57"E , 139.74 I I S89°35'13"E 2625.01 1 1 % v I l I I / 6/�/ 60 1 / / Cp \ Legal Description That part of Outlot A, BUTTERNUT RIDGE ADDITION, according to the recorded plot thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, except that portion lying within Minnesota Department of Transportation Right —of —Way Plot No 10-20 according to the recorded plot thereof. To be platted as POWERS CROSSING PROFESSIONAL CENTER. 0' 150' 300' 450' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I. I nCK 1 (n , B� 110,369 sf 00 '. 2.53 ac N3 rn o� �o m N84000'5o"E O N cam, o O V �O 419.47'� r_ rI coil Cal ® 2008 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mr. Toll Free 1-800-252-116pr III \ � y I I I I I I I - I 13— ,h � —1 I 5°, I- I — _ A = 9051'32" % I L= 216.52 R= 1258.30 =�, 4044'58" / L= 12a22 / R= 467.00/ S39 °50'21 "E 7— 16.32 5203 �_L= 1T6.21 / R= 192.00 I / '�J,,.,S12044'39"W I 1,68.44 i I I \ N89 034'34"E 479.23 I I \ O00 0)S4 I I N NO OCNNO I N 03434 "E 633.0 N89 3 34 "E � O / 96TH STREET ------I-- T —I T -I--T----- ------- 1 / W I ti N� I I , \vw Development Summary I I I � I I I i 9°53'00"E 514.19 C.B. = S10°°11'54"E I A = 17 39 32 50 I33 i — -,� L= 195.97 R= 635.83 l� A = 3705927" _ L= 2JZ58 --- R= 358.31 , 6 �025 -3 6 R' i I I I I I III Imo, \ SURVEY LINE OF EXISTING POND I I \ A r--- e n v I N89°3434 "E 150.00 Total Site: 114.21 acres Lot 1, Block 1: 8.26 acres Outlot A: 103.03 acres Outlot B.-1.74 acres PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION Road: 1.18 acres Building Setbacks: See Site Plan Parking Setbacks: See Site Plan Lot dimensions are rounded to the nearest one hundreth of a foot and areas are rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Drainage and Utility Easements will be provided as required, typically easements will include 10 feet adjacent to public right of ways and ponding areas. Existing Zoning: Agricultural Estate District rRiTeJAWNA a BUSH/SHRUB STREET LIGHT —GAs— GAS LINE CONIFEROUS TREE .. GUY WIRE Porgy POWER OVERHEAD DECIDUOUS TREE ,o' POWER POLE —PuG— POWER UNDERGROUND WETLAND E❑ ELECTRIC BOX —sAN— SANITARY SEWER ® STEEL/WOOD POST ELECTRIC METER —sro— STORM SEWER -� SIGN-TRAFFIC/OTHER Q ELECTRIC MANHOLE —TOH TELEPHONE OVERHEAD o SIGN-TRAFFIC/OTHER ® ELECTRIC TOWER —CTV— CABLE TV a. MAIL BOX OO SANITARY MANHOLE —TUG— TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND HANDICAPPED STALL co SEWER CLEANOUT O SOIL BORING G PERC TEST ® BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN Qw WATER MANHOLE Mw MONITORING WELL ® CATCH BASIN Ow WELL © CABLE TV BOX ® FLARED END SEC77ON ❑s CURB STOP BOX CURB & GUTTER BITUMINOUS SURFACE — wAr WATERMAIN v ACCESS CONTROL GUARDRAIL CONCRETE SURFACE GAS METER- DECIDUOUS TREE LINE GRAVEL SURFACE GATE VALVE X FENCE LINE �* STORM MANHOLE HYDRANT RESTRICTED ACCESS T❑ TELEPHONE BOX WATER METER SETBACK OO TELEPHONE MANHOLE HH HAND HOLE O Denotes Iron Monument Set ® TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX - TRAFFIC LIGHT • Denotes Iron Monument Found *i Denotes Cast Iron Monument Found POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108-5118 PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 \, UNITED 0 _ .. ,. _�_ Powers Crossing Professional Center I City Submittal I Set 4-01-09 I I hereby carWy Ora! tWs plan was prepared by me or wader my ahem supervision and that I am a dolt' Ocensd LAND SURVEYOR under the laws of the Step of Mitmmota. Mark R Salo Date: 04/01/09 home Na 43933 W Westwood Professional Sendces, Inc. 7699 Anagram Orin Eden Prairie, MN 553" PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL FREE 1-NO.937-5150 W2'Stwood www.weriwoodpmom Issues and Relsiims: W103/0B PREI.QA Y PLAT SUBMITTAL 09I05,'09 PER CITY COMMENTS 1010909 KO LINES &STORM PRR CITY PRELIMINARY PLAT Commissiaa No. 75372-07230 he by — SHEET C2 20061094.01PPP01.dwg NOTE: PUBLIC 10' WIDE BITUMINOUS TRAIL - Tn RF C0NSTR11CTFD W/SITF� \ \\\ \ I \ X, \ PHASE TWO PARKING GARAGE \\\\ PROPOSED SANITARY FORCE MAIN SEWER EASEMENT 3 LEVELS `\ ` 1 ® GRADE \ \ \ 2 STRUCTURED \ \ 443 PARKING STALLS ` 2 LEVEL PROOF 480 OUTLOT A \ \ 7318 TOTAL STALLS BUILDING SETBACK LINE \ \ a PARKING SETBACK LINE \ o - - --- - --- - -7-M- -- - � I o STORM SEWER EASEMENT I l N \\\ \ r , PATIENT LI 4 \ I PICKUP/DROP 0EF- --- - F \ \ I RETAINING WALL- ""�II RETAINING WALL I 1=Op� \ TRUCK DOCK W/ CONC. PAVEMENT I 1 \\ A -GRADE I II DELIVERY I a ° ACCESS �I 5' WSH T 1 PHASE TWO BUILDING >+ I I \ 120ft x 200ft x?;; 44.8' 24,000 sf/fir PHASE ONE BUILDING j 1 x 3 FLRS LOT 1 120ft x 200ft R N 1 \ 72,000 sf (Ph. 2) 24,000 sf 3FLRS fl 26 x I I I + + +88,000 sf (Ph. 1) BLOCK 1 72,000 sf \ 1 1 160,000 sf TOTAL `l +16,000 sf (2 STORY LINK) I \ FFE = 894.3 88,000 sf PHASE ONE TOTAL I I 1 1 FFE = 894.3 1 lilt 1 FF 96.0 ;, a o 2 .h \ � 1 1 \ 1 1o.b• � q gQ' qqr Q 12 1 1 26.0' / (TYP.) / *1 12 _ b171 / 10.0 _ 9.0 N N \\� ED lIii►�n D 33- �IIII� 13.1' CONNECT TO EXISTING BITUMINOUS TRAIL TRAIL PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE i Site Legend EXISTING PROPOSED - - PROPERTY LINE ................. LOT LINE SETBACK LINE - --- - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE ........................ CURB AND GUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL RETAINING WALL .................:. -X-X- FENCE CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 68 NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS 0 TRANSFORMER SITE LIGHTING TRAFFIC SIGN ro' POWER POLE ° BOLLARD / POST =W El Site Details 1 B612 CURB & GUTTER 2 B618 CURB & GUTTER 3 MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER 4 D418 CURB & GUTTER 5 BITUMINOUS CURB 6 INTEGRAL CURB AND WALK 7 CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER 8 ENTRANCE THRU CURB AND GUTTER 9 PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 10 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 11 ACCESSIBLE DROPPED PEDESTRIAN RAMP 12 CROSS WALK STRIPING 13 TEMPORARY BITUMINOUS CUL-DE-SAC 14 TRAFFIC ARROW 15 PAINTED STOP BAR AND STOP SIGN POST BASE 16 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING 17 PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP 18 TYPE 3 BARRICADE 19 BOLLARD 20 PAVEMENT SECTIONS 21 BITUMINOUS TRAIL SIGN 1 02008 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 _ Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 \ � General Site Notes 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY WESTWOOD Rq5 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. I 2. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS / SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO / EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 3. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS. 6. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 4.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 9. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OIF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTFAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 11. SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS. Signage and Striping Notes 1. PARKING LOT STRIPING SHALL BE 4" WIDE COLOR WHITE, TWO COATS OF 10' WIDE BITUMINOUS TRAIL PAINT. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS AS SHOWN IN WHITE (TWO COATS). 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED PER ADA CODE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT t ALL ACCESSIBLE STALLS, ACCESSIBLE LOGOS AND CROSS HATCH ACCESSIBLE LOADING AISLES WITH BLUE PAVEMENT MARKING PAINT (TWO COATS). 3. ALL SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND CASING WHERE REQUIRED. CONCRETE CASING REQUIRED IN LOCATIONS WHERE POST IS NOT t PROTECTED BY CURB. 4. ALL STOP SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE A 24" WIDE PAINTED STOP BAR IN WHITE PAINT (TWO COATS) PLACED AT THE STOP SIGN LOCATION, A MINIMUM OF 4' - - _ - FROM CROSSWALK. ALL STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM DIRECTIONAL - - TRANSITION BETWEEN LANES TO THE CURB. 5. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE BE PLACED 18" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I I I I I � RETAINING WALL I I I OUTLOT B � I / � I / � I . I / STORM WATER POND \ LI NWL=866.4 \ / HWL=870.2 - - - - � I ------ -- 0 0 LO LIFT STATION s.,o Sign Legend (Refer to MnDOT Details) REFERENCE SA STOP SIGN S.2 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE S.3 NO PARKING S.4 DO NOT ENTER S.5 BEGIN ONE WAY S.6 KEEP RIGHT S.7 HAZARD MARKER S.8 RIGHT TURN LANE S.9 RIGHT LANE MUST TURN RIGHT SA O PEDESTRIAN CROSSING S.11 YIELD SIZE MnDOT DESIGNATION 30" X 30" R1-1 12" X 18" R7-8M 12" X 12" RB-38 30" X 30" 135-1 24" X 30" R6-X1 24" X 30" R4-7 18" X 18" X4-2 30" X 30" R3-X1 30" X 30" R3-6 (RA) 30" X 30" W11-2 24" X 24" R1-2 0' 50' 100' 150' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAULt MN 55108-5118 PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 Lei ....\ \ 0 0 \ b u Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal I Set 4-01-09 I hereby cer" that this plan was prepared by me m under my, dhxct supeaviafm and that I am a duly Reed PROFESSIONAL RNGINM under the lama of the Stare of Minnesota Daniel AL Parke Date 04/01/09 Licmee Na 18%9 W Westwood Professional services, Inc. 76M9 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-Sail TOLL FREE 14188-937-5150 Westwood www.wrestwnoodps cma Iswes and Revisions: 87103/BB PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL W9 5/BB PER CITY COMMENTS 89124108 Pond n.M end high x,h I...1, MINN BCO LINESAND STORM PER CITY AVAN CITY SDEMITTAiI PHASE TWO CIVIL SITE PLAN Commission No. 75372-07230 kiln by LAT Checked by RME SHEET 20061094.01SPP01.dwg F c 2007 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. W Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5622 TOLLFREE 1-888-937-5150 W"twood www.westwoodps.com xe.ssiaes: 04/01/09 CITY SUBMITTAL _-jj�VY1_- Truck Turning Movements Exhibit Powers CrmftLr Professional Center Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 0' 50' 100' 150' 20061094.01 Date: 09/04/08 sheet 1 oB 1 RECONVEYANCE OF MN DOT R.O.W. TO OWNER PRIOR TO SITE CONSTRUCTION L SIGN # 2- 1141.11 t POST SIGN # 1 6/A4 MONUMENT SEE 5/A3.1 _ POWERS OVERALL SITE PLAN - PHASE TWO ill =50' 0 25' 50' v SIGN # 2- S E ' IIII*1It POST SIGN # 6/A4 Mr-UUrvVtTANUM Ur' MN DOT R.O.W. 1 AREA TO OWNER PRIOR TO SITE CONSTRUCTION POWERS i OVERALL SITE PLAN - PHASE ONE A2 1 " = 50' 0 25' 50' 100' NORTH NORTH HASE TWO SITE DATA ISTING ZONING DISTRICT: AGRICULTURAL ESTATE (A-2) OPOSED ZONING DISTRICT: OFFICE & INSTITUTIONAL (01) OPOSED USE: MEDICAL OFFICE/CLINIC NING REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED ILDING SETBACKS FRONT 35 feet 155 feet (Garage) REAR 30 feet 104 feet (Garage) SIDE 15 feet 17 feet (Garage) RKING SETBACKS FRONT 10 feet* 23 feet REAR 50 feet 46 feet SIDE 25 feet* 25 feet *Berm provided along Powers Blvd -E AREA ILDING SITE 449,104 S.F. (10.31 ACRES) ORM POND SITE 110,207 S.F. (2.53 ACRES) OPOSED BUILDING AREA 160,000 S.F. OPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 3 STORIES, 47'-6" OPOSED PARKING GARAGE AREA 174,600 S.F. OPOSED PARKING GARAGE HEIGHT 3 LEVELS, 38'-0" -E, BUILDING COVERAGE (113,818sf) 25% -E, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (264,634sf) 59% -E, PARKING LOT COVERAGE (150,816sf) 34% QUIRED PARKING SPACES MEDICAL CLINIC (6.67 SPACES PER', 1,000 S.F.) BUILDING AREA 160,000 S.F. COMMON AREA — 19.200 S.F. TOTAL AREA FOR PARKING 140,800 S.F. PARKING CALCULATION 6.67 x 140.80 = 940 TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 940 SPACES PROVIDED 761 PROOF OF PARKING 288 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED 1,049 CESSIBLE PARKING SPACES STANDARD 17 17 VAN 4 4 PHASE ONE SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING DISTRICT: AGRICULTURAL ESTATE (A-2) PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT: OFFICE & 'INSTITUTIONAL (01) PROPOSED USE: MEDICAL OFFICE/CLINIC ZONING REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT 35 feet 212 feet REAR 30 feet 192 feet SIDE 15 feet 77 feet PARKING SETBACKS FRONT 50 feet 23 feet REAR 50 feet 46 feet SIDE 10 feet* 25 feet *Berm provided along Powers Blvd SITE AREA BUILDING SITE 449,104 S.F. (10.31 ACRES) STORM POND SITE 110,207 S.F. (2.53 ACRES) PROPOSED BUILDING AREA 88,000 S.F. PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 3 STORIES, 47'-6" SITE, BUILDING COVERAGE (31,620sf) 7% SITE, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (194,154sf) 43% SITE, PARKING LOT COVERAGE (162,534sf) 36% REQUIRED PARKING SPACES MEDICAL CLINIC (6.67 SPACES PER '1,000 S.F.) BUILDING AREA 88,000 S.F. COMMON AREA — 13,200 S.F. TOTAL AREA FOR PARKING 74,800 S.F. PARKING CALCULATION 6.67 x 74.80 = 499 TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 499 �3D SPACES PROVIDED 413 PROOF OF PARKING 107 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED 520 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES STANDARD 11 11 VAN 2 2 CITY OFCHANHASSEN RECEIVED APR 0 2 2009 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108.5118 PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 OVERALL PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO SITE PLANS Issues and Revisions: City Submittal Set 04-01-09 I hereby certify that this plan,specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 04/01/09�—� Lic. No. 13041 Comission No. 75372-07230 Drawn by AW Checked by DM SHEET A2 POWERS BLVD. SITE PLAN - PHASE ONE 1"=30' U 25' ou, ,OV- POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108-5118 PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 ENLARGED SITE PLAN PHASE ONE Issues and Revisions: City Submittal Set 04-01-09 I hereby certify that this plan,specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jon R. Pope Date 04/01,09 Lic. No. 13041 Commission No. 75372-07230 Drawn by AW Checked by DM SHEET A3 L 2'-0' 2'-0' SIGN PANEL SIGN PANEL SIGN #1 SIGN #2 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS 1/2 If= 1 V-0" INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED ev Powers Crossing I PREFINISHED METAL SIGNAGE CABINET (N.I.CJ r I Professional Center - B ---------------- I TENANT 'A' ------ iB m rTENANT 'B' - --- (POWERS BL7LI ------------- ENANT'C'ENANT U CAST STONE------------- cAPXXX owers Boulevard FACE BRICK TO MATCH BUILDING _ (F8-A) MONUMENT SIGN 1 /4"=1'-0" CAST STONE CAP 8' HIGH CAST STONE ip 6� 4' HIGH CAST STONE 0 2' 4' 8' TOP OF WALL ELEV.-948'-b' - - TOP OF WALL ELEV.=941'-b' CAST ST( THIRD FLOOR ELEV. 924'-O' SECOND FLOOR CAST STONE FIRST FLOOR ELEV.=894'-O' TOP OF WALL ELEV.-941'-b' TOP OF WALL ELEV.=93m'-b' -01�TOP OF WALL FLOOR _ e s FIRST FLOOR I-rELEV.-894'-0' CAST STONE PIER BUILDING SIGNAGE (l6 SF) COMPOSITE ALUM. PANEL /FACE BRICK 'A' BUILDING ,CAST STONE /SIGNAGE (1125F) STONE BRICK 'C' F CE BRICK 'A' BRICK SOLDIER COURSE FACE BRICK 'A' COMPOSITE - ALUM. PANEL COMPOSITE ALUM. PANEL BUILDING SIGNAGE (112 SF) 1/16"=1'-0" FACE 7 BRICK 'C' TRASH ENCLOSURE RECESSED BRICK SOLDIER NOTE: W/GATES LOADING DOCK SEE DRAWING I/A3.1 COURSE FACE FOR TYPICAL NOTES BRICK 'C' COMPOSITE ALUM. PANEL- RTU SCRE N BUILDING SIGNAGE (24 SF) OL TOP OF WALL ELEV.=949'-0' - - TOP OF WALL FACE BRICK 'A' ELEV.=941'-b' BRICK SOLDIER COURSE FACE BRICK 'A' TOP OF WALL ELEV.-926'49' BRICK SOLDIER COURSE FACE BRICK 'A' SECOND FLOOR _ ELEV.-9m9'-0' FIRST FLOOR _ ELEV.-894'-0' " PFIEFINISNE METAL COPING NOTE: SEE DRAWING I/A3.1 FOR TYPICAL NOTES THERMALLY - BROKEN ALUM FRAME W/ TINTED LOW - E GLASS (TYP) CAST STONE PIER (TYP) BUILDING SIGNAGE (405F) COMPOSITE ALUM. PANEL EAST ELEVATION 1/16 11= 1 '-0" • w�®:ter®�q�rs �® -- - - • • � - �nminmm�nnmm�nnnnnnnmmnnnnnini � I!■IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIBnIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIII�III I■IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIImIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII■AI ■ n=■ 0 8' 16' 31 TOP OF WALL =AGE BRICK A' ELEV.=941'-b' BRICK SOLD ER COURSE FACE BRICK 'A' _ 70P OF WALL -- _--.--- - ELEV.-926' V BUILDING SIGNAGE (42 SF) COMPOSITE ALUM. PANEL /RECESSED BRICK COURSE - TYP \FACE BRICK 'C' BRICK SOLDIER CAST STONE- TYP COURSE FACE BRICK 'C' CAST STONE PIER (TYP) NORTH ELEVATION 1/16 11 = 1 1-011 BRICK 'A' STONE FACE BRICK 'B' RECESSED BRICK COURSE-TYP BUILDING 51GNAGE (405F) RECESSED BRICK COURSE- TYP CAST STONE BASE WEST ELEVATION Md BUILDING SIGNAGE (325F) SECOND FLOOR ELEV: 909'-0' FIRST FLOOR ELEV.=894'-0' 0 8' 16' 3: BUILDING SIGNAGE (112 SF) COMPOSITE ALUM. PANEL CAST STONE BUILDING 51GNAGE (90 SF) PREFINISHED METAL COPING COMPOSITE ALUM PANEL-TYP SPANDREL GLASS SHOWN THUS- TYP CAST STONE -FACE BRICK 'C' 0 8' 16' 3S TOP OF WALL ELEV.-948'4' TOP OF WALL J� ELEV.z.-941'-b' Y THIRD FLOOR ELEV.=924'-0' SECOND FLOOR ELEV.-WV 0' FIRST FLOOR ELEV.=894'-0' POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAULMN 55108-5118 R. (651) 642.9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 �0m; r e. .... Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 BUILDING ELEVATIONS PHASE ONE Issues and Revisions: City Submittal Set 04-01-09 I hereby certify that this plan,specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Date 04/01/0e Commission No. Lic. No. 13041 75372-07230 Drawn by AW Checked by DM SHEET A4 L 1/16 11 = 1 1-011 0 8' 16' 3: CAST FACE ALUM. PANEL BUILDING .... _ SIGNAGE (112SF) PHASE ONE PHASE TWO I. GA/`L �OI/-V IAI u Y ELEv.= s r I J SECON Y ELEv.= a FIRST F ELEv.= COMPOSITE ALUM. PANEL NOTE: SEE DRAWING I/A3.1 FOR TYPICAL NOTES SOUTH ELEVATION 1 / 1 b"=1 '-U" EAST ELEVATION 1 / 16"=1 '—U" SEE DRAWING I/A3.1 FOR TYPICAL NOTES NORTH ELEVATION BRICK SOLDIER COURSE FACE BRICK 'A' BRICK 'C' FIRST FLOOR O 8' 16' 32 TOP OF WALL ELEY: 948'-b' TOP OF WALL ELEv.=941'4 THIRD FLOOR ELEY.=924'-0' Y SECOND f FIRST P ELEY.-B O 816' 32 __ — -- __ _ __ — —■ _,•,>�mn We.111„!>♦[IR6�,B�.Ie�L>'>Ofa>oiall•AYId =IN1—if111e67�.1.11pRR®,>Bep,l Woo =_ = ,— 11— ==_==_= _=_==I= = = = =_ = = =_=='= = _= == rsai� == - == = = =E==== = —====_ ==_= - --—'1=='='=='=11=11='='=='='=11=11=-11-11—I=I-='='-11-11-= _— - — - - - — — - -- -11-11='_I=='_' == = = _ == _ = — H Mom MIL�Iee1��nY®ee a Deno a �seooeewnsoeelorm®uo_wo>.Ill�.�eeoee.lem WHOM ■ew a ®�.�..+o•ers�..�elxx.ae a_ a nl ®�weemooeo®vm��ee�la�weema�.ura - -- __ _ _ _INE Zoo _ Moo_ __ _ _ _ 1_'_I--' I-11-1—=_=I„_■'■'■I■_=-11-11—'=-'_-'=_'-11-11=_11=11—'_'=-11_ eaom�o+ec— e® ■_ �� ¢ elm.xeomomoassml—a.r_r_a—ow.m.lw—Ira_e®®arals�rroer__ aeeae®m_ n eunra i ie®I.eomoa+a�lw—ea.rm®reu—a� - moo • • •I _— __ _ -- —11==11=11—I=_'=='=-'_11-11==11=1 _ _Moo_ _ _— _ — __ _ _ _ _ _ _— E 11-11=I Ic ''I-11=11=-11— — � E = = = = E = _ = = _■' -■IiBli■'��l�i■ ___ _ ■�[1■mod■'�■ -- ■�89 0000000�I�•a��••�1••■"•-,€••"-' -- ■ _ _ "==11—"=11=�_"--"—„= — _ _ — — 1■1■� =11011=11_1011-11—"= I�G 1■1 _' 8i■■■■■■■ 1-11=11=.E11=11— 1■@ = = !■ilk = ===='■ �g8■ - ■1,= If■■VMIIC ■ = =WREN i■ �1■1 == i6Y1■ == fi■� _ _ l� !�8 1■1 _ = 1■!�I B■� _ _ ■F9B == 1■Q _ _ 1■1 _�...� - .•- —_ - — — —�- _�_r�1■__=1—=11-11==11-11-11==111=11=11==11-11--11_ _ _11-11— • 1 POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 551os-s11a PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 ... U N I T ED PROPERTIES Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 BUILDING ELEVATIONS PHASE TWO Issues and Revisions: City Submittal Set 04-01-09 I hereby certify that this plon,specification,or report was prepared b me or under my direct P su ervision and that t I y am a dul Y Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Date 04/01/09' ---' Lic. No. 13041 Commission No. 75372-07230 Draw by AW Checked by DM SHEET A5 F DASHED INDICATES FUTURE PARKING LEVEL FOR PROOF - - OF PARKING (TYP) F- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I - - - - - - - -- ---------------I-T------ rl---------I� ---------------I-L--------------------I1----------------1� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -J -------------------------- I I I L---------------------------------- FACE BRICK ON PRECAST PRECAST COLUMNS SPANDRALS (TYP) EL. = 929.0' EL. = 918.0' EL. - 901.0' EL. = 895.0' NORTH ELEVATION 1/16"=1'-011 0 8' 16' 32 DASHED INDIC TES FUTURE PARKING LEVEL FOR P OF I I I I OF PARKING (TYP) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COMPOSITE ALUM ------------------------� ----------------------------____--------------� � �-- ____________ IL-1---J----------J-L-------- —_____--------LL--------LL--------LL--------LL--------LL L-II - - - - ---------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- ------- 4 EL.=929.0' ----IT--------�T-------- - --------T7 _------ �—_____� �`-------T�--------Tr---------TF I I -- EL. = 9180 - - - F-7 — I -------Bill- --------- H ------ �tH EL.=895.0' BRICK SOLDIER COURSE PRECAST COLUMNS FACE BRICK ON (TYP) PRECAST SPANDRALS INSULATED GLASS SET IN ALUM. FRAMES s SOUTH ELEVATION A6 1/16"=1'-0" O 816' 32 EL. - 929.0, EL. ='311 EL. - S9 EL. - 89 DASHED INDICATES I- FJTURE PARKING LEVEL FOR PROOF I - - - - - - - - OF PARKING (TYP) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - F- -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ---------------------4-----4 I h----------------I-r--------------------T-I- - - - - - - - - 4 - - - H EL. = T30' EL. = 918.0' EL. = 901.0' EL. = 895.0' (TYP) F'KkCA5I SPANDRALS WEST ELEVATION 1/161'-1'-0" DASHED INpIGATE FUTURE PARKING LEVEL FOR PRO 0 8' 16' 32 —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I --------- II- L---LJ---------I-I---------I-I---------I-I---------U-___=====d=====_--��---------- - - - - - - - - ------------�� ---------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = = - - - - - - - �L---n---------n---------n------ n=========Q---- n---------n---------n---------n---------n----i (TYP) F'mtca51 SPANDRALS POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN sslos-511s PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 ii 111 S N .5. .. /__.. i r... 'ei :d �. i.% n M t � 44. Y r Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 PARKING GARAGE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE TWO Issues and Revisions: City Submittal Set 04-01-09 I hereby certify that this plan,specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Date 04/01/09'-----' Lic. No. 13041 Commission No. 75372-07230 Drawn by AW Checked by DM SHEET L NORTH ELEVATION 1/1 611= 1 '-0" O 8' 16, 32 PLANT SCHEDULE CODE QTY COMMON/130TANICAL NAME SIZE NOTES TBD OVERSTORY —CAL. IN. — SUM * Sugar Maple / Acer saccharum 2.5" BB ABM — Autumn Blaze Maple / Acer freemanii 'Jeffersred' 2.5" BB REO — Red Oak / Quercus rubra 2.5" BB WHO — * White Oak / Quercus alba 2.5" BB BUO — * Bur Oak / Quercus mocrocarpa 2.5" BB GSL — Greenspire Linden / Tilia cordata 'Greenspire 2.5" BB PRE — Princeton Elm / Ulmus americana 'Princeton' 2.5" BB TBD ORNAMENTAL — CAL. IN. — THT Thornless Hawthorn / Crataegus crus—golli inermis 1.5" BB FVB — Fox Valley Birch / Betula nigra 'Little King' 1.5" BB SSC — Spring Snow Crabapple / Malus 'Spring Snow' 1.5" BB PRC — Prairie Rose Crabapple / Malus 'Prairie Rose' 1.5" BB TBD CONIFEROUS — CAL. IN. CBS — * Colorado Blue Spruce / Picea pungens 7' HT., BB BHS — Black Hills Spruce / Picea glauca densata 7' HT., BB WHP — * White Pine / Pinus nigra 7' HT., BB TBD SHRUBS TEA — Techny Arbovitae / Thuja occidentalis 'Techny' 6' HT., BB 48" O.C. MAJ — Money Juniper Juniperus chinensis Maneyi 24" HT., #5 CONT. 36" O.C. MJJ — Mint Julep Juniper / Juniperus chinensis 'Monlelp' 36" SPRD., #5 CONT.36" O.C. SCJ — Scandia Juniper / Juniperus sabina 'Scandia' 24" SPRD., #5 CONT.36" O.C. ALC — Alpine Currant / Ribes alpinum 24" HT., #2 CONT. 30" O.C. DBH — Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle / Diervilla lonicera 24" HT., #5 CONT. 30" O.C. DKL — Dwarf Korean Lilac / Syringa meyeri 'Palibin' 36" HT., #5 CONT. 36" O.C. COL — Common Purple Lilac / Syringa vulgaria 36" HT., #5 CONT. 48" O.C. ABH — Annabelle Hydrangea / Hydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle" 36" HT., #5 CONT. 36" O.C. CAD — Cardinal Dogwood / Corrlus sericea 'Cardinal' 36" HT., #5 CONT. 36" O.C. CAV — Compact American Viburnum / Viburnum trilobum 'Bailey Compact' 36" HT., #5 CONT. 36" O.C. SMS — Snowmound Spirea / Spiraea nipponica 'Snowmound' 24" HT., #5 CONT. 36" O.C. NFS — Neon Flash Spirea / Spiraea japonica 'Neon Flash' 24" HT., #2 CONT. 30" O.C. I I I-I-t =J ,� �M._ 886 894: .. 8.. ._gg.._, 862 ._ I .� -! h H V PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN 02008 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED APR 0 2 2009 CHANHASSEN PLANMNG DEPT 0' 50' 100' 150' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108.5118 PH. (651) 642.9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 UNITED PROPERTIES Powers Crossing Professional Center Set 4-01-09 I bereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct empervldon and that I am a duly licensed I.ANDSCAPH ARCHF= under the laws of the Stele Of MiaanDte. Chad H Feigum Dom 04/01/09 i iaeme No. 46508 ■�.�� t�OL11YNN{i Westwood Professional Service, Im 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 553" PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-SM TOLL FREE 1-8W937-5150 weImwestwaoodpLoom Issues and Re k;: 07103N6 PPELIMNARY PLAT SUEMMAL 091050 PERCITYCOMMENTS 09I1A108 Pond wemel wdhiyh wxm Rvels 10106M BCO LINES & STORM PER CITY WIM =SUB=ALSET - PHASE ONE LANDSCAPE PLAN CommdIon No. 75372-07230 Drone by CEF Checked by CEF SHEET L2 20061094.01 PLP02.dwg PLANT SCHEDULE CODE QTY COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME SIZE NOTES TBD OVERSTORY — CAL. IN. — SUM * Sugar Maple / Acer saccharum 2.5" BB ABM — Autumn Blaze Maple / Acer freemanii 'Jeffersred' 2.5" BB REO — Red Oak / Quercus rubra 2.5" BB WHO — * White Oak / Quercus alba 2.5" BB BUO — * Bur Oak / Quercus macrocarpo 2.5" BB GSL — Greenspire Linden / Tilia cordata 'Greenspire' 2.5" BB PRE — Princeton Elm / Ulmus americana 'Princeton' 2.5" BB TBD ORNAMENTAL — CAL. IN. — THT Thornless Hawthorn / Crotaegus crus—galli inermis 1.5" BB FVB — Fox Valley Birch / Betula nigra 'Little King' 1.5" BB SSC — Spring Snow Crabapple / Malus 'Spring Snow' 1.5" BB PRC — Prairie Rose Crabapple / Malus 'Prairie Rose' 1.5" BB TBD CONIFEROUS — CAL. IN. CBS — * Colorado Blue Spruce / Picea pungens 7' HT., BB BHS — Black Hills Spruce / Picea glauca densata 7' HT., BB WHP — * White Pine / Pinus nigra 7' HT., BB TBD SHRUBS TEA — Techny Arbovitae / Thuja occidentalis 'Techny 6' HT., BB 48" O.C. MAJ — Money Juniper Juniperus chinensis 'Maneyi' 24" HT., E5 CONT. 36" O.C. MJJ — Mint Julep Juniper / Juniperus chinensis 'Monlep' 36" SPRD., #5 CONT. 36" O.C. SCJ — Scandia Juniper / Juniperus sabina 'Scandia' 24" SPRD., #5 CONT. 36" O.C. ALC — Alpine Currant / Ribes alpinum 24" HT., #2 CONT. 30" O.C. DBH — Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle / Diervilla lonicera 24" HT., #5 CONT. 30" O.C. DKL — Dwarf Korean Lilac / Syringa meyeri 'Palibin' 36" HT., #5 CONT. 36" O.C. COL — Common Purple Lilac / Syringa vulgaria 36" HT., #5 CONT. 48" O.C. ABH — Annabelle Hydrangea / Hydrangea arborescens 'Annabelle" 36" HT., #5 CONT. 36" O.C. CAD — Cardinal Dogwood / Cornus sericea 'Cardinal' 36" HT., #5 CONT. 36" O.C. CAV — Compact American Viburnum /Viburnum trilobum 'Bailey Compact' 36" HT., #5 CONT. 36" O.C. SMS — Snowmound Spirea / Spiraea nipponica 'SnoWmound' 24" HT., #5 CONT. 36" O.C. NFS — Neon Flash Spirea / Spiraea japonica 'Neon Flash' 24" HT., #2 CONT. 30" O.C. FLS — Fire Light Spirea / Spiraea x 'Fire Light' 18" HT., #2 CONT. 24" O.C. LOT 1 " .HASE ONE BUILDING 120ft' x•-200ft 24,000 sf 6 LQC. K x _ 3 Ff�S 72,000 sf +16 000 sf STOR 88,000 s PH,ASE �99=M*3t*-111W1 , t PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN *iIt 02008 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED APR 0 2 2009 CHANHASSEN PLANMNG DEPI NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION POPE ASSOCIATES INC 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 551o&5nf PH. (651) 642.920( FAX (651) 642-110 mr i ` P 8 I' 1 ? �� za 3 x E 0 i� i >. I .. Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 I hereby amMfy that tlde plea wu preip" by me or under m1 dhect amperafei® and that I am a duly, Ii—sed LANDSCAPE AECtE = under the laws of the State of Idinneaota. Chad IL Feignm Due 04/OV09 LWaame No. W08 W Westwood Professional Services. Inc 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 ��aa�� TOLL FREE 1-88.937-5150 awanaaa www.vvedwoodps oom Iswles and Resin 01103108 PAaBBARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 09105108 PERCITYCOM n WIN108 Pond..iand No warm ke da 10106M BCO L WES & STORM PER CITY O 010 CITYSUBMMALSET PHASE ONE LANDSCAPE PLAN Commission No. 75372-07230 Drawn by CEF f1erked 6v CEF SHEET L2 20061094.01PLP02.dwg t- 3 7 t . 9 f ,. '2 . C t2 3 Y2.1 2 . z,. t2 . 6 12 , ? }2',,, ?2 . R -t2. a Y3 3 2 . 9 2 3. --2 +2,612 i 4'2.4#2.6 M12 12 5 3.1 3 a 4.1 4.3 4.5 4.7`4 3 932 2,9 3,7 3.1 3.3 3.0 2,9 3.4 4.1 a.1 0.8 6.1 6.3 6.5 6 2 5.4 `4.�8,:::. ... +3.C*4 *4,64.2+3.5*3..7.4.,33. 4+64�.4 t7,93. 0 {;.�.9-.4+6.55.4 - 4 4 5.% S.a 5 t4.3,4.D 4 6.4 .4 G.4.Q.7 91.2 II:;~ II.c ,.7 6.2 h Y {� 6 z ,,3 .9 # 6 {, 5 > 4' 5 5.4 6.1 3.1 6.3 6..9..9..,s9_..5 4 4 4 i87%]39.6{ b5.95 z5n16 a62 13: i3'a"11,1`c 65#69a.1 .,0. S9.3 +6. r 5.4 5 1 5..7. 16.'i 6.2 M19.... 19:0 18. 6'�.9 9.0 +6.4 9.1 9. . 8.6 13A'.31fl.? +' 3 6.u'5 ,4 a._b 6.3 Y7.1 k.3 6,9 8 5.. a. z..6.0 2.1 s,n s 0 } '• Fj.2 } 6.4 6 s,3' 4 -.*'r''��5.2 t t } 6.0 6.3 '%.2 �' # `v � �' 39 ,.1',6.3 7 6.V a.� 5.01'+5 041.3346 3.s4. 2--4.55.45. ° 5p.36:24.84.1 {3,3 +3 .53.93.93,4 33.5 {3.9 #4.44.2 {39R.fl'3,,73.63:929. t H 3.0 3.5 3.4 1 3.3 M1 4a.2 3 °2 3.2 i # 3.3 3.5 3.5 { 3,T - 4 M1 3 1 u.3'3-.� 3.3 3.1 2.8 2,412.73.32.93,J 3.13.23.43. 4'.A3 >0v,.03.13.2+. 2.3+2.5 3.312 9 3 .. 33 2 3,3 3,5 3.z 3 b 13i'7,', '' 3.9 4,C 3.412.'8 ^2. r,- 2.9 3.? 3.2 0 3.4 o.5_a,3 4.4 9;3 0.l 5}2, 5,2 5.3 5.3 4.2 $.3.9.7 4.3 4.1 3 0 5_.3_8-4.4 5.s 6.2 6 6..'7 6.8 6.9 6.3 a.3 4.2.... . 4':9 `4.z 5,34 IV, 2 s,C..*4,-5 .36.4{7.4 i b 4 8.0 6.z 6.3 +if .1 t7,36.R 6.2 - S,N 6.0 6. S•.5... i.9--5.9+6.2 +7.3 6.2 G.9 9. Ii19.118.9 6.2 `S.D S.a t 8.9 Y 7.a6.3 _ + +'+ + 5•e'5:`? 6.7 2.9 4 fl.o 9+.4 10, lf:0. 4'8.3 6 75,55.46. 3 18.8+c.2111117�,�-l618,.619.01' 6.0 -40' . A.a k.a+6 +5 2 6.1'7 36.39_3 la. 'F3 .'S i.3 +f`i. "'11 .;76.24.4 : '. `�9U4i50, u9.3 `6 95 %5.5 6.z�.2 s.3+4 9+8. 3',9.`1''i'.?+13.411 c5.7 4.2 i�86.5 .S M16 5.1 5.66.3 217.a +8.1.93.2 t7. 3'1%.36.1 .3 3.G 05,94.9411 4.1+4.4 t, 15. 9*6. 6 16 . 316.56.35.95.0 3.9'2,9 3.8 5':1 4.5 4.2 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.? 4.4 4.9 4.9 4.7 4.5 4.2 3.3 .3.0 2,2 +3. 13, E+3, 53. 2`2, 92. 6 2. 2, 7'. 3.2 3,.3 3'.,1 3 b i+2 R 2.I.?2,6+2,22.7, 12.3 t2 ;.a 2,1 2.2 2.2 2,0 2, 1'.2,2 2.1 2,01 . 1 nrS A,g ..7 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - TOP OF PARKING RAMP SCALE: 1" = 40' Lum.i.naire Location Summary LumNo Label z Orient 1 B 30 270 2 B 30 270 3 B 30 2?0 4 B 30 2?0 5 B 30 270 11 A2 30 5 7 WM 18 lEC 8 B 30 5 9 WM 18 ISO 10 WM 18 180 11 A2 30 5 12 B 30 5 13 B 30 90 14 A2 30 90 15 A2 30 90 16 A2 30 90 17 A2 30 90.. 18 A2 30 95 19 B 30 90 20 B 30 90 21 B 30 90 22 B 30 90 23 B 30 352.473 -THIS POLE FOOTING DETAIL IS TYPICAL, FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY; ACTUAL FOOTING SHOULD BE DESIGNED FOR THE SPECIFIC APPLICATION AND LOCATION WITH CONSIDERATION TO ACTUAL REQUIRED SEISMIC, SOIL, WIND LOAD CONDITIONS. ETC. UGHT #10 GROUND WIRE TO LIGHT FIXTURE GROUND LUG INSIDE POLE OPPOSITE HANDHOLE BASE PLATE COVER 1" FORMED CHAMFER \RE COPPER (HAND TROWEL EDGE NOT ACCEPTED) VD WIRE IN ANCHOR BOLTS (4 REDO) PVC CONDUR NTH TWO NUTS EACH. INSTALL SO WITH PARKING LOT. SEAMLESS SONOTUBE TYPE FORM FOR CONCRETE BASE.(REMOVE SONOT GRADE LEVEL CADWEID OR - DOUBLE LUG CONNECTION TIES Ole D.C.' REINF. (4 REO'0) ICE EVENLY RUORNISH, NO PAINT) -"CONDUITS (PVC) SCH 40 WITH COPPER CLAD 5" R LONG SWEEP ELBOWS GROUND ROD f24� " ALL RESTEEL GRADE 60, ASTM A813 DIMENSION SCHEDULE z "x=IBD zaz-D^ CONCRETE SHALL BE 4.000 PSI O 28 DAYS WITH 6% AIR 04-MANMENT TYPICAL LIGHT POLE BASE DETAIL NTS SCALE: 1" = 40' t Calculation Summary Label Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Mtn General Parking 5.74 9.9 2,4 2.39 4.13 Top or Parking Ramp 5.42 10.8 1.3 4,:i.7 8.31 Luminaire Schedule Symbol 4ty Label Arrangement Lumens LLF Description 7 A2 BACK -BACK 110000 0.750 Techlight #VBLADiBx2-100OW-M1H-TYP5 - ?ale 4RTP27 �----••III®�� 13 B SINGLE 110000 0.750 Techlight #VBLAJIBX2-I000W-MH-TYP3 - Pole #RTP27 ® 3 WM SINGLE 36000 0.750 Techlight 4VBMAJ3BX2-400W-MII-TYP3 - Wall Mtd at 161 General Notes A. Perimeter, type III, fixture optics are to be directed into the site. SITE LIGHTING SCOPE NOTES Fixture Manufacturer: Techlight Fixture Side Skirts: None Lamp Type: Metal Halide Pole Material: Steel Lamp Wattage: 1000W Mounting Height: 27' Pole + 3' Base Lamp Orientation: Vertical Concrete Base: 3' High & 24" Dia. Fixture Type: Shoe Box For Additional Lighting Information and Pricing Contact: On -Site Lighting 8c Survey, LLC PH: 763-684--1548 Project No. 7080626 Based on the information provided, all dimensions and lumindre locations shown represent recommended positions. The engineer and/or architect must determine applicability of the of the layout to existing or future field conditions, This lighting pattern represents illumination levels calculated from laboratory data taken under controlled conditions utilizing current Industry standard lamp ratings In accordance with illuminating Engineering Society approved methods. Acutai performance of any manufacturer's luminaire may vary due to variation in electrical voltage, tolerance in lamps And other variable field conditions. GD (.� o rn N J N wFW% MtD Mco (0 rah . � En h- t() X .I-_ LL n Z �N ^� W �+A z Ln o � 015 r N (Qto ) 00 m w r M r GQ r t (/ C r � 0 (L Revision: Date: A 7/31/2008 B 9/04/2008 C 4/01/2009 L) W 0 F-Z 0< y I,.l. n F Z W d U3 I- � O Q � W Z Z = Z U � a Project #: 7080626 Contract #: Issue Date: 6/26/2008 Scale: AS NOTED DrawNCheicked: SAS/SAZ Sheet #: Rev. # SL1 I B 1 02008 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Concept Sanitary Sewer Plan Powers Crossing Professional Center X 0' 100' 200' 300' 07/03/08 > 04/01/09 att sueuinAL Westwood Professional Services, Inc 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL FREE i-NO-937-5150 www.westwoodps.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ation'°- 874.00 M ELEV i0. 00 7 200610945KCO2DWG ®2007 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Westwood Professional Services, Inc 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL FREE 1-886-937-5150 www.westwoodps.com Revisions: o4/ai/o9 CITY susMRTAL Record Drawing by/dale: Truck Turning Movements Exhibit Powers Crossina Professional Center Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 0' 50' 100' 150' 20061094. Date: 09/04/08 sheer: 1 of 1 Grading Legend PROPOSED � 980. 982 x 91.00 1.50% �4 9 E.O.F. 85.00 0 SB-19 O PROPERTY LINE INDEX CONTOUR INTERVAL CONTOUR CURB AND GUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL SILT FENCE STORM SEWER FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER RETAINING WALL DRAIN TILE RIDGE LINE GRADING LIMITS ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT SPOT ELEVATION FLOW DIRECTION TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SOIL BORING LOCATION INLET PROTECTION 02008 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 Notes 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. 2. CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVEMENT, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS. 3. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 4. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SOD OR SEED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 6. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THIS SHEET. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING AND PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITH UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. 8. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & GUTTER FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. 9. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL THAT EXISTS AFTER THE SITE GRADING AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDED A STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL DESIGN 928 ..... CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. 12. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. N :, `, 13. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, AT 9 MINIMUM, WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE. PROOF ROLLING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING MINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITH FULLY —LOADED TANDEM —AXLE DUMP TRUCK, OR APPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF 9 2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISION AND DIRECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF FAILURE SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND RECOMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. 14. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKING AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTLINED IN IMNDOT 2105.3F1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 111 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 906.�- �Ij: 15. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS OR 1'� PARKING AREA, SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF i THE ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F2. 894.. I 16. ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. Erosion Control Notes 1. SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND SITE IN ALL FILL AREAS AND LOCATIONS WHERE STORM WATER RUNOFF MAY LEAVE THE SITE, PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 2. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. 3. SILTATION AND EROSION CONTROL: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSION OF THE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED CATCH BASIN INSERTS, ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND SILT FENCE. CONTROL SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALL IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR'S METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITION OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AFFECTED AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION (WIMCO OR EQUIVALENT) AROUND ALL CATCH BASIN GRATE INLETS, AFFECTED BY THIS CONSTRUCTION. 5. ALL UNPAVED AREAS ALTERED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE RESTORED WITH SEED AND MULCH, SOD, WOOD FIBER BLANKET OR BE HARD SURFACE WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 6. FOR AREAS WITH SLOPE OF 3:1 OR GREATER, RESTORATION WITH SOD OR WOOD FIBER BLANKET IS REQUIRED. 7. PUBLIC STREETS USED FOR HAULING SHALL BE KEPT FREE 0f SOIL AND DEBRIS. STREET SWEEPING SHALL BE COMPLETED DAILY. CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED APR 0 2 2009 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT 0' 50' 100' 150' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108.5118 PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 k e: Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 I hereby carlffy that Ws plea was Prepared by me m under my dired supeevidrm and that I we a duly, liomeed PROFESSIONAL ENCWM under the lawn of the Shfe of Aline oM DMW ILL Parks 04/O1/09 Issues and Reisims: WfflvoB PRnIMTSARY PLAT SMMITTAL 09105/ PLRCITYCOMMLNTS 091249 Pond m.n I and high wale, 1,,.1 1010610E KOUSES &STORM PER CITY Wl01M =SOBMITTALSBT License No. 18919 Westwood Profesional Sellars, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN SSW PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-580 TOLL FREE I-SW9373150 www.weriwoodpmorn PHASE TWO GRADING DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN Commis ion Ro. 75372-07230 Drawn by LAT Checked by RIME SHEET C4 20061094.01 GDP01.dwg `\ \ 8" PVC PLUG \\ IE=859.1 1)DIP U ` PROPOSED O\ \ \\ 20' EASEMENT \ \ MH-8 xl", �� RE=908.2 \ \ IE=858.6 \ \ POSSIBLE SANITARY SEWER \ \ FORCE MAIN ALIGNMENT BY OTHERS \ F,y _ - \tea - - - - - - - _ - - - PHASE TWO PARKING GARAGE �`\? - 3 LEVELS CBMH-6- \ 1 ® GRADE MH-4 \ 2 STRUCTURED RE=894.1 \ IE=878.8 I \ 443 PARKING STALLS FES-57 PROPOSED MH-5 \ 2 LEVEL PROOF MH-7 MH-6 IE=888.0 I RETAINING WALL RE=892.9 \ 480 RE=892.4 RE=893.0 - - `\ +288 IE=881.40 IE=880.67 T IE=879.60 , - S H-54 ►►- 731 TOTAL STALLS I . _ _ ►► CBMH-10 I STMH-56Z-- - - - -�CBMH-11A �-►► MH-55 ► `SJ1vlH- a gp�1. 5 SAN SERVICE \\ IE=885.0° 1 " G T ° CBMH-11 1 SAN SERVICE 1 1 IE=884.3 \ I PHASE TWO BUILDING 120ft x 200ft 24,000 sf/fir 1 \ 1 18 RD-12A x 3 FURS 72,000 sf (Ph. 2) 1 RD- 1 C H 1 +88.000 sf (Ph. 1) I 1 160,000 sf TOTAL FFE = 894.3 b FFE - 5.0 1 1 1 1 g gg 4'g P \ 1 � I I I\\I I CBMH-24 \ 1 � 3 STMH-26 ✓ I 1 G mnsa ' PHASE ONE BUILDING 120ft x 200ft 24,000 sf/fir x 3 FURS 72,000 sf +16.000 sf (2 STORY LINK) 88,000 sf PHASE ONE TOTAL IFFE = 894.3 B -3 I I M�t-t-I--,-=- ---- ,•� t I I I I I i i � � � � � �� I I I I I I I I I . t. MH LIVER EX. SAN SEWER EX. STUB IE=850.00 J -15 H-1 ,_rr[TM E=8 IE (E EXISTING CULVERT IE=8? TO BE REMOVED EX - tE= DROP MH-3 RE=896.7 IE=872.7 i IE=857.3 I ♦ 3 I of I 1n �I MH-2 I N RE=887. IE=856.f 200 CBMH 3 13 I < CBMH�1 ♦ Q 38If / ♦ (� 4 / � 3 STMH-53 5 Key Utility Crossings a1 RET. WALL = 892.E 10 8" SAN = 857.25 12" STO = 889.9 8" WAT = 887.98 DIE. - 1.2' DIF - 30.0' a2 21" STO = 886.90 11 8" SAN = 857.20 8" SAN = 884.3 24" STO = 880.70 DIF - 1.9' DIF - 22.8' Q3 24" STO = 881.98 12 24" STO = 880.58 8" SAN = 879.20 8" WAT = 887.26 DIF - 3.0' DIE - 4.5' ® 24" STO = 881.52 13 8" SAN = 856.55 8" WAT = 885.23 15" STO = 883.64 DIF - 3.0' DIF - 26.4' a5 8" SAN = 857.50 14 15" STO = 883.18 12" STO = 891.55 8" WAT = 879.90 DIF - 33.4' DIF - 2.6' © 8" SAN = 857.40 al 8" WAT = 874.63 24" STO = 885.11 8" SAN = 856.09 DIE - 2.70' DIF - 17.8' a7 12" STO = 890.35 <J61 18" STO = 874.12 8" WAT = 889.1- 8" WAT = 869.84 DIF - 1.5 DIF - 3.6' *LOWER WM TO 888.15 17 8" SAN = 855.55 ® 12" STO = 892.00 18" STO = 874.40 24" STO = 883.69 DIF - 18.2' DIE - 0.6' 18 12" STO = 888.10 a9 24" STO = 883.75 8" WAT = 883.48 8" WAT = 889.54 DIE - 3.9' DIF - 3.7' ELEVATIONS NOTED FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY ARE AT THE INVERT DIF. DENOTES CLEARANCE BETWEEN PIPES/WALL Mr--------------------- --- ---I 1= I I I I I 1 I / I 1 i / I STMH-52 PROPOSED / ►►\ RETAINING WALL i I � I STMH-3 \ ►.►\ I I FES-1 W/ RIPRAP STORM WATER POND ►\ 2 � / IE=866.1 NWL=866.4 Jl ue I HWL=870.2 \y �♦- - - - - - - - - J--------------- 17 STMH-51 16 CB H-16 FEE 50 I ° EX. �__ . . . _- . . - E=8 5.72 EX. 62 -18" PVC OCS-30 REMOVE PLUG & SDR 18 @ 0.40% STMH-31 CONNECT TC EX. 18" PVC PLUG 16" DIP WM IE-839.76 FES-32 CBMH-17 IFT SITATION a a RELOCATE EX. EX. MH-18 oHYDRANI 10 STA. 88+00 50 R CURB PER CITY -_ S DETAIL 18" IE S=840.10 -EX. 16" B.V. EX. 16"x 16" CROSS DD DD �- -� SEX. 16"x 8" REDUCER - EX. 16" B.V. 8" PVC EX. 8" DIP IE IE=850.00 PLUG Storm Sewer e - - - �-I -I Structure Drains To Slope Pipe Pipe Pipe Rim Elevation Invert Elev. Pipe invertsin/out /I No. i Type i Structure No. i % I Dia(in.) I Length iMateriall Up Structure i Up Structure Dn. Structure I of structure # Inv 1 Dir Inv 2 Dir Inv 3 Dir 12A RD 12 1.00 12 7 RCP 894.30 888.30 888.23 12A 888.30 N 12B RD 12 2.50 15 34 RCP 895.00 888.70 887.85 12B 888.70 S 11A CBMH 11 1.00 12 20 RCP 908.00 890.00 889.80 11A 890.00 NW !� 12 CBMH 11 0.70 21 90 RCP 891.46 887.45 886.82 12 887.45 E 887.85 N 888.23 S 11 CBMH 10 0.80 21 120 RCP 892.97 886.82 885.86 11 886.82 S 886.82 W 889.80 SE 10 CBMH 9 0.80 21 144 RCP 891.94 885.86 884.71 10 885.86 S 885.86 N / 9 CBMH 8 0.90 21 77 RCP 892.91 884.71 884.02 9 884.71 S 884.71 N 8 CBMH 7 1.00 21 93 RCP 889.76 884.02 883.09 8 884.02 S 884.02 N 7 CBMH 7A 1.00 21 47 RCP 892.53 883.09 882.62 7 883.09 S 883.09 N 7A STMH 5 1.00 24 199 RCP 894.00 882.42 880.43 7A 882.42 S 882.62 N 6 CBMH 5 3.00 12 88 RCP 900.20 893.20 890.56 6 893.20 SW \ 5 CBMH 4 1.25 24 123 RCP 895.17 880.43 878.89 5 880.43 S 880.43 W 890.56 NE 15A RD 15 1 3.00 12 11 RCP 894.30 887.60 887.27 1 15A 887.60 W 15 CBMH 1 14 1 3.20 12 1 40 RCP 1 890.57 887.27 885.99 1 15 1 887.27 1 S 1 887.27 E 14 CBMH 1 13 11.70 15 1 92 RCP 1 889.30 885.79 884.23 1 14 1 885.79 ISEI 885.99 N 13 CBMH 1 4 1 3.50 15 1 44 RCP 1 887.80 884.23 882.69 1 13 1 884.23 1 S 884.23 NW 4 CBMH 1 3 1 1.90 24 1 128 RCP 1 887.80 878.89 876.46 1 4 1 878.89 1 W 878.89 E 882.69 N 24 CBMH 26 0.45 12 202 RCP 1 894.50 1 891.20 1 890.29 1 24 1 891.20 JW 23 CBMH 26 0.45 1 15 80 RCP 1 895.90 1 892.00 1 891.6E 1 23 1 892.00 1 N 22 CBMH 21 1.00 12 72 RCP 895.90 886.80 886.08 22 886.80 S 21 CBMH 20 1.50 15 134 RCP 890.65 885.88 883.87 21 885.88 S 886.08 N 20 CBMH 19 2.00 15 205 RCP 889.67 883.87 879.77 20 883.87 SW 883.87 N 19 CBMH 16 2.00 18 95 RCP 886.40 875.70 873.80 19 875.70 S 879.77 NE 882.74 NW 25 CBMH 19 0.50 12 53 RCP 886.65 883.00 882.74 25 883.00 SE 18 CBMH 17 1.00 12 46 RCP 875.75 872.00 871.54 18 872.00 S 17 CBMH 1 16 1.00 12 54 RCP 1 875.70 871.54 871.00 17 871.5E E 871.5E N 16 CBMH 3 2.00 18 82 RCP 877.84 870.60 868.96 16 870.60 SE 871.00 W 873.80 dN3 STMH 1 0.80 33 33 RCP 877.00 866.36 866.10 3 866.36 SW 868.96 NW 876.46 57 FES 56 1.00 24 27 RCP 888.00 888.00 887.73 57 888.00 W 56 STMH 55 1.00 24 165 RCP 897.00 887.73 886.08 56 887.73 S 887.73 E 55 CBMH 54 1.00 24 133 RCP 893.80 886.08 884.75 55 886.08 SE 886.08 N 54 STMH 53 1.00 24 136 RCP 897.00 884.75 883.39 54 884.75 S 884.75 NW 53 STMH 52 6.60 24 241 RCP 898.50 883.39 867.48 53 883.39 W 883.39 N 52 STMH 51 2.20 24 317 RCP 872.00 867.48 860.51 52 867.48 SW 867.48 E 51 STMH 50 0.25 30 42 RCP 872.50 860.11 860.01 51 860.11 SW 860.51 NE EX. UTILITY INFORMATION TAKEN FROM MNDOT PLANS DATED 02/14/06 Utilitv Lezend - - - - PROPERTY LINE ........ ..... ..... .............. ... ..- - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER ►------- 0 SANITARY SEWER - ------ -- ::----------- FM SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN ►►-� STORM SEWER WATER MAIN -----f HYDRANT ............ I.......... ;:::........................ cns GAS ---PUG- UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ...... ,, .. ...... Parr OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ........................ ........................ ruc UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE ....................... rav OVERHEAD TELEPHONE ................ ..... .:..::........... -............ rna TELEPHONE FIBER OPTIC C7v CABLE TELEVISION ►►► DRAIN TILE ►� GATE VALVE FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) JjE LIGHT POLE VERTICAL UTILITY SEPARATION 0' 50' 100' 150' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION General Notes 02008 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER, 'STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS. 5. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. WATER MAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS. ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTALLING ON SLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JOINT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPE MANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. FITTINGS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION. 8. PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS. 9. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER MAIN CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER. 10. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED. 11. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 12. ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE, CLASS 52 WITH 7.5' MINIMUM COVER. PROVIDE MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 18" FROM SANITARY SEWER & STORM SEWER. INSULATE WATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 7.5, OF COVER. 13. INSULATION SHALL BE DOW STYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS. 14. SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35 OR 26. SDR 26 IS REQUIRED FOR DEPTHS GREATER THAN 15 FEET. SANITARY SEWER PIPE WITHIN 5 FEET OF BUILDING AND UNDER FOOTINGS, PIPE SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40. 15. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" AND SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) WITH R-4 GASKETS, OR HDPE STORM SEWER PIPE IF ALLOWED BY THE CITY. HDPE STORM PIPE SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M294, TYPE S WITH WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS. SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS WHERE RCP IS REQUIRED. PVC STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL BE RCP WITH TRASH GUARDS & RIP -RAP. 16. POST INDICATOR VALVES SHALL BE CLOW F-5750 (OR EQUIVALENT) MEETING AWWA STANDARD C509 AND CITY STANDARDS. VALVE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINT RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE. POST TO BE ADJUSTABLE FOR 8 FEET WATER MAIN DEPTH. THE ELECTRICAL ALARM SWITCH SHALL BE PART NO. PCVS2 (OR EQUIVALENT). 17. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS -BUILT RECORD OF UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE AS -BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST -CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED. A MIN. 2 CU. YDS. RIP -RAP CLASS 3 1/4 " X 1" FLAT BAR (ROLLED TO PROVIDE OUTER RING) OUTSIDE MH WALL TO FLAT BAR = 1" PROVIDE 4-1/2- SS ANCHOR BOLTS W/CLIPS A HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED GRATE IN 2 SECTIONS CUSTOM CONCRETE WElf WITH V-NOTCH (SEE CROSS SECTION FOR DIMENSIONS) I.E.= 865.0 0 _u WEIR SECTION NTS -#5 SMOOTH BAR ® 4" O.C. EACH WA (PROVIDE 3-1/4" x 3-1/4" OPENING) PLAN RE=870.4 F_ 9" -5" V-NOTCH IE=866.8 POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108-5118 PH. (651) 642.9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 PROP ERTIES UNITED Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal 4-01-09 I hereby ca tlty that Ode plan was prepared by me or undee my direct supervisim and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL HNGWEEIt under the laws of the state of Mlrmesom Daniel hE Parks Daft 04/OVM Licism No. 18919 W Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-= TOLL FREE 14IW937-5150 www.westwoodps c m Issues and Reiions: W105108PRELIM.ARYPLAT SUBMUAL 09105N8 PER CITY COMMENTS WIN68OCS IkRT1 & Pavd.4 imd high Y*,1w,h I0106108 BCO LINLS&STOR.M PER CITY OIINAC CITYstmi TALSBT PHASE TWO UTILITY PLAN Cammissial No. 75372-07230 Ihawn by LAT Checked b� RME SHEET 5__ 20061094.01UTP01.dwg NOTE: \ PUBLIC 10' WIDE BITUMINOUS TRAIL TO BE CONSTRUCTED W/SITE ___N _ D 3 OUTLOT A BUILDING SETBACK LINE \ ^ PARKING SETBACK LINE0 IL _ _ _ - r --------- _ - - - - _- - 21 I C71 I \� \d T I RETAINING WALL PATIENT _ �- �\ I L---= - - - ---------_--- PICK UP_/_DROP OFF_ \� TRUCK DOCK I \ W/ CONC. PAVEMENT I a 73.2' 26.0' r. tn'.• Tt`}e I I \ PHASE ONE BUILDING LOT 1 Q 120ft x 200ft N I \ BLOCK 1 x 24,000 sf 3fl FLRS I I I + Q 72,000 sf I +16,000 sf (2 STORY LINK) 88,000 sf PHASE ONE TOTAL I o a FFE = 894.3,gao' .I ��}�Pft 9.0 1 A. am I N � - \ �-- MNDOT _ �yp-) no -LINE-(T` N 0 In / 10 6. 12 12 / 1 I 1 ✓ h PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN EXISTING""" PROPOSED - - - PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)- -� - - - Site Legend EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE _..................... LOT LINE .......... ........... - SETBACK LINE ....... ..... _....- - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE .........""'"' CURB AND GUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL RETAINING WALL ..................;;..... -X-X- FENCE CONCRETE PAVEMENT' CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 6s NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS Q TRANSFORMER SITE LIGHTING T TRAFFIC SIGN - POWER POLE - ° BOLLARD / POST El Site Details 1 B612 CURB & GUTTER 2 B618 CURB & GUTTER 3 MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER 4 D418 CURB & GUTTER 5 BITUMINOUS CURB 6 INTEGRAL CURB AND WALK 7 CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER 8 ENTRANCE THRU CURB AND GUTTER 9 PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 10 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 11 ACCESSIBLE DROPPED PEDESTRIAN RAMP 12 CROSS WALK STRIPING 13 TEMPORARY BITUMINOUS CUL-DE-SAC 14 TRAFFIC ARROW 15 PAINTED STOP BAR AND STOP SIGN POST BASE 16 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING 17 PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP 18 TYPE 3 BARRICADE 19 BOLLARD 20 PAVEMENT SECTIONS 21 BITUMINOUS TRAIL ® 2008 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 General Site Notes 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. 2. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY (LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 3. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, .AND TRUCK DOCKS. 6. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 4.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 9. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 11. SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS. Signage and Striping Notes 10' WIDE BITUMINOUS TRAIL 1. PARKING LOT STRIPING SHALL BE 4" WIDE COLOR WHITE, TWO COATS OF PAINT. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS AS SHOWN IN WHITE (TWO COATS). f 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED PER ADA CODE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ALL ACCESSIBLE STALLS, ACCESSIBLE LOGOS AND CROSS HATCH ACCESSIBLE LOADING AISLES WITH BLUE PAVEMENT MARKING PAINT (TWO COATS). t 3. ALL SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND CASING WHERE REQUIRED. CONCRETE CASING REQUIRED IN LOCATIONS WHERE POST IS NOT PROTECTED BY CURB. 4. ALL STOP SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE A 24" WIDE PAINTED STOP BAR IN WHITE PAINT (TWO COATS) PLACED AT THE STOP SIGN LOCATION, A MINIMUM OF 4' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FROM CROSSWALK. ALL STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM DIRECTIONAL TRANSITION BETWEEN LANES TO THE CURB. 5. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE BE PLACED 18" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS I OTHERWISE NOTED. I RETAINING WALL I � I I I OUTLOT B � I / I � � I � � I . I / I / STORM WATER POND I NWL=866.4 . HWL=870.2 -----... ----------- - -- 0 0 LO LIFT STATION s.10 Sign Legend (Refer to MnDOT Details) REFERENCE SIZE MnDOT DESIGNATION SA STOP SIGN 30" X 30" R1-1 S.2 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE 12" X 18" R7-8M S.3 NO PARKING 12" X 12" R8-38 S.4 DO NOT ENTER 30" X 30" R5-1 S.5 BEGIN ONE WAY 24" X 30" R6-X1 S.6 KEEP RIGHT 24" X 30" 134-7 S.7 HAZARD MARKER 18" X 18" X4-2 S.8 RIGHT TURN LANE 30" X 30" R3-X1 S.9 RIGHT LANE MUST TURN RIGHT 30" X 30" R3-6 (R/L) S.10 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING 30" X 30" W11-2 S.11 YIELD 24" X 24" 131-2 O1� 0' 50' 100' 150' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108.5118 PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 Pn .� Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 I hereby ca'dfy that this pLn was prepared by me w under my, direst eupervisim and that I am a duly H=wd PROPBSSTONAI. HNGINM under the laws of the State of bHnnesoW Daniel X Palo Deft 04/01/09 Lieeoae No. 18919 W Westwood Profesionai Servlces, Inc. 7699 Anagram Me Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-SM TOLL FREE 14MO-937-5150 Vftsh ood warw.wesiwoodpsxom Issues and Wsims: 07/07106 PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL 09/05106 PERCMCUENTS 09/2410S Pond.,[and h* walelevels 10106108 BCO LNES @ STORM PER CM 04101 09 ClT SUBMI MAL SET PHASE ONE CIVIL SITE PLAN Commission No. 75372-07230 Drawn by LAT Checked by RME SHEET c6 20061094.01SPP02.dwg PLANT SCHEDULE CODE QTY 85 SUM COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME * Sugar Maple / Acer soccharum Autumn Blaze Maple / Acer freemanii SIZE NOTES — CAL. IN. REO — Red Oak / Quercus rubra 2.5" BB WHO — * White Oak / Quercus alba 2.5" BB BUO — * Bur Oak / Quercus macrocarpa 2.5" BB GSL — Greenspire Linden / Tilia cordato 'Greenspire 2.5" BB PRE — Princeton Elm / Ulmus americana 'Princeton' 2.5" BB 91 ORNAMENTAL — CAL. IN. THT — Thornless Hawthorn / Crataegus crus—galli inermis 1.5" BB FVB — Fox Valley Birch / Betula nigra 'Little King' 1.5" BB SSC — Spring Snow Crabapple / Malus 'Spring Snow' 1.5" BB PRC — Prairie Rose Crabapple / Malus 'Prairie Rose' 1.5" BB 23 CONIFEROUS — CAL. IN. CBS — * Colorado Blue Spruce / Picea pungens 7' HT., BB BHS — Black Hills Spruce / Picea glauca densato 7' HT., BB WHIP — * White Pine / Pinus nigra 7' HT., BB TEA MAJ M JJ SCJ ALC DBH DKL COL ABH CAD CAV SMS NFS FLS 495 SHRUBS Techny Arbovitoe / Thuja occidentalis 'Techny' Money Juniper Juniperus chinensis Maneyi Mint Julep Juniper / Juniperus chinensis 'Monlep' Scandia Juniper / Juniperus sabina 'Scandia' Alpine Currant / Ribes alpinum Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle / Diervilla lonicera Dwarf Korean Lilac / Syringa meyeri 'Polibin' Common Purple Lilac / Syringa vulgaria Annabelle Hydrangea / Hydrangea arborescens 'Anna ell Cardinal Dogwood / Cornus sericea 'Cardinal' Compact American Viburnum / Viburnum trilobum 'Borne Snowmound Spirea / Spiraea nipponica 'Snowmound' Neon Flash Spirea / Spiraea japonica 'Neon Flash' Fire Light Spirea / Spiraea x 'Fire Light' Com Erin o.i.oI 24"• HT 36" SP 24" SP 24" HT 24" HT 36" HT 36" HT 36" HT 24" HT 18" HT. 48" O.C. CONT. 36" O.C. 5 CONT. 36" O.C. '5 CONT. 36" O.C. CONT. 30" O.C. CONT. 30" O.C. CONT. 36" O.C. CONT. 48" O.C. CONT. 36" O.C. CONT. 36" O.C. CONT. 36" O.C. 30" O.C. 24" O.C. k-I,-lay Jl• r'tMMIl yz'.. M SDO — Stella De Oro Daylily / Hemerocallis Stella De Oro 2—Year, #1 CUNT 18" O.C. ASD — Apricot Sparkles Daylily / Hemerocallis 'Apricot Sparkles 2—Year, #1 CONT 18" O.C. AJS — Autumn Joy Sedum / Sedum x 'Autumn Joy' 2—Year, #1 CONT 24" O.C. SAG — Russian Sage / Perovskia atriplicfolia 2—Year, #1 CONT 24" O.C. BES — Black Eyed Susan / Rudbeckia fulgida 'Goldsturm" 2—Year, #1 CONT 18' O.C. KFG — Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass / Colamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster 2—Year, #1 CONT 36' O.C. RSH — Royal Standard Hosto / Hosta 'Royal Standard' 2—Year, #1 CONT 24" O.C. FFR — Feesays Form Ribbon Grass / Phalaris orundinacea 'Feesays Form' 2—Year, #1 CONT 18" O.C. RSG — Red Switchgrass / Panicum virgatum 'Shenandoah' 2—Year, #1 CONT 24" O.C. EMI — Engelman Ivy / Parthenocissus quinquefolia var. engelmonii 2—Year, #1 CONT VARIES NOTES: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. OWNER RESERVES THE OPTION TO RELOCATE EXISTING CONIFERS AND DECIDUOUS PLANT MATERIAL ON SITE AND USE FOR LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS REGARDLESS OF THE TYPE OF SPECIES. * DENOTES EXISTING PLANTS FOUND ON SITE TO BE USED FOR PLANTINGS. i i , i t ; PLANTING NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER "ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 or 800-252-1166) TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANT OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ONE YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL ALSO HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MIINNESOTA—GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5: 3. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2004 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER STANDARD ANSI PLANTING PRACTICES. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL —IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY — PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING. WRAP ALL SMOOTH —BARKED TREES — FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. STAKING OF TREES OPTIONAL; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. BACKFILL SOIL TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS. ALL SHRUB PLANTING BEDS (WITHIN SODDED AREAS) SHALL HAVE WEED BARRIER FABRIC, 4" OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH AND VALLEY —VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING. THE EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND AT LEAST 3' FROM THE CENTERS OF EVERGREEN TREES. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). ALL PERENNIAL BEDS AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH AND VALLEY —VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING. THE EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. FOUR INCHES OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH SHALL BE USED AROUND ALL TREES WITHIN TURF AREAS. SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH 4" DEEP SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL PLANTING BEDS ADJACENT TO SIDEWALKS AND DRIVEWAYS. SEEDED AREAS TO BE MN/DOT SEED MIX 340 EXCEPT AROUND THE POND. REFER TO MN/DOT SEEDING MANUAL 2007 EDITION FOR EXACT SEED QUANTITIES, BROADCAST RATES, ACCEPTABLE SEED INSTALLATION METHODS, AND FOR MAINTENANCE OF SEEDED AREAS. SEEDING AROUND THE POND SHALL BE PLANTED WITH BWSR SEED MIX W5 (WETLAND FRINGE), AS SHOWN ON PLAN, DOWN TO THE NORMAL WATER LEVEL OF THE POND. FOR EXACT BWSR SEEDING MIXTURES AND BROADCAST RATES REFER TO "RESTORING & MANAGING NATIVE WETLAND & UPLAND VEGETATION" DATED JANUARY 2006. FOR MAINTENANCE OF AREAS SEEDED WITH BWSR W5 REFER TO CHANHASSEN FAIRVIEW MEDICAL CENTER LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PLAN BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX. ALL SOD AREAS SHALL BE PREPARED WITH 4" OF TOPSOIL AND RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AREAS AS SHOWN ON PLAN WITH MN/DOT SEED MIX 330 (NATIVE MIX FOR SANDY/DRY AREAS). REFER TO MN/DOT SEEDING MANUAL 2007 EDITION FOR BROADCAST RATES, EXACT SEEDING MIXTURES, SEASON OF PLANTING FOR SEEDING, SEED ESTABLISHMENT METHODS, AND ALL MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AND SODDED AREAS ON SITE. NO IRRIGATION SHALL BE PLACED WHERE MN/DOT SEED MIX 340 IS PLANTED, AS SHOWN ON PLAN. IRRIGATION WILL BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. I REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. .. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. LANDSCAPE DATA CANOPY COVERAGE DATA: EXISTING CANOPY COVERAGE ON SITE — 221,675 SF. (40%) PROPOSED CANOPY COVERAGE TO REMAIN ON SITE — 124,341 SF. (23%) CANOPY COVERAGE REQUIRED ON SITE — 109,498 SF. (20%) BUFFERYARD DATA: BUFFERYARD "B" USED IN CALCULATIONS POWERS BOULEVARD (0.8 MULTIPLIER USED) — 720 LF. TOTAL OVERSTORY TREES REQUIRED — 14 TOTAL UNDERSTORY TREES REQUIRED — 21 TOTAL SHRUBS REQUIRED — 35 HWY 312 (ON —RAMP) (1.0 MULTIPLIER USED) — 572 LF. TOTAL OVERSTORY TREES REQUIRED — 12 TOTAL UNDERSTORY TREES REQUIRED — 23 TOTAL SHRUBS REQUIRED — 36 OVERALL PLANT DATA: REQUIRED PROVIDED TOTAL OVERSTORY TREES — 26 108 TOTAL UNDERSTORY TREES — 44 94 TOTAL SHRUBS — 71 495 TREE DETAIL 02008 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. LEAVE LEADERS INTACT. GUYING AND STAKING IS MANDATORY FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STELL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTNAT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1 Y2" WIDE STRAP. WHERE WRAPPING IS CALLED FOR: WRAP FROM GROUNDLINE UPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES. PLACE 4" DEPTH OF SPECIFIED MULCH OVER PLANT PITS — DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. REMOVE CONTAINER, SET SOIL MASS ON COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING SHRUBS NATURAL GROUNDLINE tq o WITH FINISHED GRADE. O vh ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 4" OF SPECIFIED MULCH AND WEED BARRIER FABRIC. EDGE ALL PLANTING BEDS WITH SPECIFIED EDGER WHERE ADJACENT TO LAWN AREAS. 71 SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. I'• i �'IJ a �'II,� x_� I � / BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. I i� SHRUB DETAIL i EVERGREEN DETAIL LIFT STATION J S /Vv' v" ""' v'v SEED LIMIT LINES (TYP.) ARE IA NOT IMIT TO BE IRRIGATED AREA INFS (TIP.) AREA NOT TO BE IRRIGA ARE PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. LEAVE LEADERS INTACT. GUYING AND STAKING IS MANDATORY FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STELL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTNAT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1 Yz" WIDE STRAP. PLACE 4" DEPTH OF SPECIFIED MULCH OVER PLANT PITS — DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. Chanhassen Fairview Medical Center Landscape Maintenance Plan Chanhassen, Minnesota *Refer to Phase Two Landscape Plan dated September 5, 2008 for specific limits of seeded areas. W5 Seeded Areas: Year 1 — Planting: Season for Planting April 15—July 20 or Sept 20—Oct 20. If spring plartl,g— after seeding mow 6-8 inches with mower every 30 days after planting until September 30. Weed control —mowing should help con rol annua weeds. Spot spray thistles. If fail planting, the following season mow 6-8 irl w ,- mower once *r May, June, and July. Weed control —mowing should help control annual weeds. Spot spray tr.istle. "valuation: Cover crop growing wit -in 2 weeks of plarl (except dormant plantings). Seedlings spaced 1-6 inches apart In drill rows. iHc,be grass seedlings may only be 4-6, inches tcl,. If there is a flush of crawt'n from foxtc:l etc., mow as necessary with mower. Year 2 — Maintenance: Mow 6-8 inches with mower one time between June 1—August 15 before weeds set seed. Weed co^trot—mowing should keep an-uel weeds down. Spot so ay thistles etc. Some sites may not require much maintenance the second year. valuation: Cover crop will be gone unless winter wheat was Lsec In a fall planting. Grasses forming clumps 1-6 inches apart in drill rows, out still short. Some flowers should be blooming (back —eyed Suscns, be,gcmot, etc). If there is a flusn of growth from foxtail, etc., mow site with mower. Year 3 — Maintenance: Mow area with mower only if necessary. Spot spray thistles, etc. for weed control. Sites usually do not require much maintenance the third year. val ation: Plcn:ing should begin looking ilke a proine—to, grasses, flowers etc. Long Term .Maintenance: Soot spray thistles etc. for weed control. Burning (3-5 year potation) al,e,rcte spring and fall if possible. Haying (3-5 year roto,ion) lace summer or early fall. Alterne;e with burning (may s bstituie for burning). 3urning two years in a row will really clean up rough loo'xmg sites. POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108-5118 PH. (651) 642.9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 UNITED PROII�ERTIIS Powers Crossing Professional Center I City Submittal I Set 4-01-09 I hereby oatlfy that this plan area Prepared by me or under my direct sups victim and that I am a duly Heeoeed LAND5CAPS ARCHITSCr ender the Ievra of the state of Minnesota Chad F. FW ++* Daft M/0" Uce vae Nm 465M W VYeatwood Profesianei Services, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 553" PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5922 TOLL FREE I.OW937-5150 H11lest111100d www.westvecodpaaom Issues and Ri 07103N8 PRE11l PLAT SUBMITTAL 09/008 PER CITY COMMENTS 09/24I0g P.M .,1e high water levels 10/06/OB III LINES PER CITY 04101AN CITY SUBMITTAL SBT PHASE TWO LANDSCAPE PLAN Commission Ro. 75372-07230 Drawn by CEF Checked by CEF SHEET 0' 50' 100' 150' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 20061094.01 PLP01. dwg F RECONVEYANCE OF MN DOT R.O.W. TO OWNER PRIOR TO SITE CONSTRUCTION L 3 1 -4 2 PARKING ST ►11 21111111111111M PHASE TWO BUILDING 120ft x 200ft 24,000 sf/fir x 3 FLRS 72,000 sf (Ph. 2) +88,000 sf (Ph. 1) 160,000 sf TOTAL - - POWERS SL JD, OVERALL SITE PLAN - PHASE TWO 1"=50' _ - POWERS OVERALL SITE PLAN - PHASE ONE A2 1 " = 50' 0 25' 50' 100' NORTH WALL 3ATIENT DROP-OFF 72,000 sf +116,000 sf (2 STORY LINK) 88,000 sf PHASE ONE TOTAL CITY TRAIL y N� t � � I111111111 MONUMENT SEE 51A3.1 _ — KLL;UNVLTANL;L Ur �— MN DOT R.O.W. - - i AREA TO OWNER PRIOR TO SITE CONSTRUCTION_ 0 25' 50' 16117"Or�llm 100' PHASE TWO SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING DISTRICT: AGRICULTURAL ESTATE (A-2) PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT: OFFICE & INSTITUTIONAL (01) PROPOSED USE: MEDICAL OFFICE/CLINIC ZONING REQUIREMENTS BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT REAR SIDE PARKING SETBACKS FRONT REAR SIDE *Berm provided along Powers Blvd SITE AREA BUILDING SITE STORM POND SITE PROPOSED BUILDING AREA PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE AREA PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE HEIGHT SITE, BUILDING COVERAGE (113,818sf) SITE, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (264,634sf) SITE, PARKING LOT COVERAGE (150,816sf) REQUIRED PARKING SPACES MEDICAL CLINIC (6.67 SPACES PER 1,000 S.F.) BUILDING AREA 160,000 S.F. COMMON AREA 119,200 S.F. TOTAL AREA FOR PARKING 140,800 S.F. PARKING CALCULATION 6.67 x 140.80 = 940 TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED SPACES PROVIDED PROOF OF PARKING TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES STANDARD VAN PHASE ONE SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING DISTRICT: AGRICULTURAL ESTATE (A-2) PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT: OFFICE & INSTITUTIONAL (01) PROPOSED USE: MEDICAL OFFICE/CLINIC REQUIRED PROVIDED 35 feet 155 feet (Garage) 30 feet 104 feet (Garage) 15 feet 17 feet (Garage) 10 feet* 23 feet 50 feet 46 feet 25 feet* 25 feet 449,104 S.F. (10.31 ACRES) 110,207 S.F. (2.53 ACRES) 160,000 S.F. 3 STORIES, 47'-6" 174,600 S.F. 3 LEVELS, 38'-0" 25% 59% 34% =61 761 288 1,049 17 17 4 4 ZONING REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED PROVIDED BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT 35 feet 212 feet REAR 30 feet 192 feet SIDE 15 feet 77 feet PARKING SETBACKS FRONT 50 feet 23 feet REAR 50 feet 46 feet SIDE 10 feet* 25 feet *Berm provided along Powers Blvd SITE AREA BUILDING SITE 449,104 S.F. (10.31 ACRES) STORM POND SITE 110,207 S.F. (2.53 ACRES) PROPOSED BUILDING AREA 88,000 S.F. PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT 3 STORIES, 47'-6" SITE, BUILDING COVERAGE (31,620sf) 7% SITE, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (194,154sf) 43% SITE, PARKING LOT COVERAGE (162,534sf) 36% REQUIRED PARKING SPACES MEDICAL CLINIC (6.67 SPACES PER 1,000 S.F.) BUILDING AREA 88,000 S.F. COMMON AREA 13,200 S.F. TOTAL AREA FOR PARKING 74,800 S.F. PARKING CALCULATION 6.67 x 74.80 = 499 TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 499 SPACES PROVIDED 413 PROOF OF PARKING 107 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED 520 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES STANDARD 11 11 VAN 2 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED APR 0 2 2009 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 125s ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN sslos-511s PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 3 P i{ i ! t TE j t �'k Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 OVERALL PHASE ONE AND PHASE TWO SITE PLANS Issues and Revisions: City Submittal Set 04-01-09 I hereby certify that this plan,specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jon R. Pope Date tic. No. 13041 Commission No. 75372-07230 Drawn by AW Checked by DM SHEET A2 F POWERS BLVD. SITE PLAN - PHASE ONE 1"=30' 0 25' 50' 100' POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108.5118 PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 ...................- Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 ENLARGED SITE PLAN PHASE ONE Issues and Revisions: City Submittal Set 04-01-09 I hereby certify that this plan,specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jon R. Pope Date 04/01/09 Lic. No. 13041 Commission No. 75372-07230 Drawn by AW Checked by DM SHEET I� L I F 2'-0' 2'-0' SIGN PANEL SIGN PANEL VISITOR F DELIVERIES PARKING 0 4—STAFF h STAFF SIGN #1 SIGN #2 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS 1 /2"=1 '-0" 3' SQ. ALUM. POST. (TYP.) REFLECTIVE VINYL LETTERS (TYP.) GRADE 0 1' 2' 4 INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED PREFINISHED METAL SIGNAGE CABINET (N.I.C.) (POWERS BLVD SIDE) CAST STONE� CAP FACE BRICK TO MATCH BUILDING (FB-A) - �I Powers Crossing I I Professional Center I I ---------------- TENANT 'A' ' TENANT'B' - ------------- TENANT C -------------- I TENANT'D --------- XXX owers Boulevard 771 MONUMENT SIGN 1 /4"=1 '-0" CAST STONE CAP 8' HIGH CAST STONE io c+ 4' HIIGH CAST STONE TOP OF WALL _ a ELEV.=948'-b' r TOP OF WALL ELEV= 941'-b' CAST i— THIRD FLOOR _ ELEV: 924'-0' SECOND FLOOR ELEv.=909'-0' CAST STONE FIRST FLOOR CAST STONE PIER F CE BRICK 'A' BRICK SOLDIER COURSE FACE BRICK 'A' FACE BRICK 'C' BRICK SOLDIER COURSE FACE BRICK 'G' COMPOSITE - ALUM. PANEL NOTE: SEE DRAWING VA3.1 FOR TYPICAL NOTES COMPOSITE ALUM. PANEL BUILDING SIGNAGE (112 SF) Ilk - TRASH ENCLOSURE W/GATES COMPOSITE ALUM. PANEL CAST STONE PIER NOTE: CAST STONE SEE DRAWING I/A3.1 FACE BRICK 'C' FOR TYPICAL NOTES SOUTH ELEVATION 1 / 16"=1 '-0" f � 1 �� I RECESSED LOADING DOCK EAST ELEVATION 1 /16"=1'-0" FACE BRICK A' BRICK SOLD ER COURSE FACE BRICK 'A' -CAST STONE _ TOP OF WALL FACE BRICK'A' ELEV.=941'-b' FACE BRICK 'A' BRICK SOLDIER COURSE FACE BRICK 'A' - THIRD FLOOR SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR FACE BRICK 'C' BRICK SOLDIER COURSE FACE BRICK 'A' 0 8' 16' 3: TOP OF WALL ELEV.-941'4' TOP OF WALL - ELEV.-926'-b' SECOND FLOOR ELEv=TOV-0' FIRST FLOOR ELEV.-894'-0' POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 12s5 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN sslos-511a PH. (651) 642-9200 FAx (65Q 642-11o1 n T E a P R 0 P E R, : E S Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 BUILDING 8IG4AGE (42 SF) COMPOSITE OL TOP OF WALL ALUM. PANEL _ RECESSED BRICK 70P OF WALL FACE BRICK 'A' COURSE - TYP BUILDING SIGNAGE : 941'-(I12 SF) ELEVb' _ J - COMPOSITE e BRICK SOLDIER - - ALUM. PANEL COURSE FACE - - _ � BRICK 'A' -- _ - _ - — OL TOP OF WALL _ --_ - - _ - --_ ELEV.-926'-b' CAST STONE BRICK SOLDIER - --- -- — - - - - COURSE FADE - -- - CANOPY BRICK 'A' BUILDING SECOND FLOORmmrm - �ELEV.=909'-0' - -- - - ELEVATIONS - _ -- PHASE ONE FIRST FLOOR ELEv.-894'-0- FACE BRICK 'G' Issues and Revisions: NOTE: BRICK SOLDIER CAST STONE- 7YP City Submittal Set 04-01-09 SEE DRAWING I/A3.1 COURSE FACE FOR TYPICAL NOTES BRICK 'C' CAST STONE PIER (TYP) 2 NORTH ELEVATION A4 1 /16"=1 '-0" 0 8' 161 32' BUILDING SIGNAGE FACE BRIGK 'B' (90 SF) COMPOSITE ALUM. FREFINISHE METAL FACE BRICK 'A' PREFINISHED PANEL- RTU SCRE N COPING RECESSED BRICK CAST STONE COURSE- TYP - METAL COPING TOP OF WALL BUILDING SIGNAGE I herebycertifythat this lan,s ecification,or llb SF) L _ _ _ J TOP OF WALL ' report as prepared b me or under m direct TOP OF WALL _ _ ___ _ _ ELEV.=941'-b' COMPOSITE _ _ _ _ — � ELEV.=S41'-b' P P P Y ALUM. PANEL - —-_----- --- - — PANEL TYP Sa erVlslon and that am a dulyLicensed gf,9 TOP OF WALL — :--. -.- ...-----:-- — -- _ ---- - -- Architect under the laws of theStateof Minnesota: FACE BRICK A BUILDING , SIGNAGE (112SF) - - L J AST STONE -- -- -- - - - r TOP OF WALL _ - - ELEV=926'-b' SPANDREL THIRD — ELEv 9z4' 0' � Jon R. Pope HM .. - --- — -- TSHowry THUS- � � Date 04�01�09 Lic. No. 13041 SECOND FLOOR - -- — — -- -- GA57 STONE - SECOND LEv.FLOOR Caamission No. 75372-07230 -- - _ E=909'-ld' — -- -- — ELEV.=909'-0' .. ... ....... : .. ... Town y e = - --- _ - - ❑ ❑ — _ ACE BRICK c �, Checked by DM FIRST FLOOR -- - - ❑ « ~ ❑ _ : _ -.-- - -- -- _------- - _ FIRST FLOOR __ ELEV.=894'-0' ELEV.-894'-0' CAST STONE CANOPY BUILDING THERMALLY -BROKEN SHEET FACE BRICK 'C' SIGNAGE (24 SF) ALUM FRAME W/ TINTED BUILDING BUILDING LOW - E GLASS (TYP) SIGNAGE (406F) RECESSED BRICK SIGNAGE (325F) COURSE- TYP CAST STONE PIER (TYP) CAST STONE BASE BUILDING A4 SIGNAGE (405F) , WEST ELEVATION A4 1/1 611=1 '-0" 0 8' 16' 32' F BUILDIWz SIC44AGE (240 SF) TOP OF WALL ELEV:956'-6' PREFINISHER METAL COPING TOP OF WALL _ ELEY.=937'-6' COMPOSITE ALUM. PANEL-TYP 7NIRD FLOOR SPANDREL ELEV.=920'-0' - —GLASS SHOWN THUS- TYP SECOND FLOOR ELEY: 905'-O' CAST STONE FACE BRICK 'C' CAST PHASE ONE PHASE TWO NOTE: SEE DRAWING I/A3.1 FOR TYPICAL NOTES DKIf—r, H SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16 „ „ =1'-00 8' 16' 32 EAST ELEVATION 1 / 16"=1 '-0" I SEE DRAWINCs I/A3.1 FOR TYPICAL NOTES � NORTH ELEVATION 1/16"=1'-0" 011=1111IMP BUILDING SIGNAGE (325F) TOP OF WALL ELEV: 948'-6' TOP OF WALL ELEV.=94 4'Y THIRD FLOOR ELEV.=924'-O' SECOND FLOOR ELEY.=9O9' FIRST FLC ELEY.=894 0 8' 16' 32 BUILDING 5IG4AGE (90 SF) PREFINISHED METAL COPM COMPOSITE ALUM. PANEL-TYP SPANDREL GLASS SHOWN THIIS- TYP STONE BRICK 'C' 0 8' 1632 TOP OF WALL ELEV: 948'-V TOP OF WALL ELEv.=941'-6' THIRD FLOOR ELEY. 924'-O' SECOND FLOOR Y.= ELE9O9'-O' FIRST FLOOR r�_ ELEY: 894'-O' Y POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 5slos-511s PH. (651) 642-9200 FAx (651) 642-1101 is i � ./ ... ......... . P E / _... S Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 BUILDING ELEVATIONS PHASE TWO Issues and Revisions; City Submittal Set 04-01-09 I hereby certify that this plan,specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the.State of Minnesota, Date Lie. No. 13041 Connission No, 75372-07230 Drawn by AW Checked by DM SHEET AS 1/1 611= 1 '-0" O 8' 16 32 INDICATES I FUTURE PARKING I I rDA514ED LEVEL FOR PROOF ---�---- OF PARKING (TYP) - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - I---4--------------------------------------------------- - — — — — — — —---------------- ------------ I-i--------------- --- I I-- - ------� ----- ----------------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I L---------------------------------- i FACE BRICK ON PRECAST PRECAST COLUMNS SPANDRALS (TYF) NORTH ELEVATION 1 /16"=1'-0" EL. = 929.0' EL. = 918.0' EL. = 901.0' EL. = 8952' DASHED INDIG TES I I FUTURE PARKIRi I I LEVEL FOR PR OF — — — — — r — — — — — — — — — — — — — - ------------------------{ COMPOSITE ALUM ------ —------- -- T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --� �I--- �T------IT-- -----------TF-------__�_______--- --------TF---------TF---I J �I JL-----JL-------- __--------LL--------LL----------LL--------1L- LI----I� ---------- - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - --- 7 T - - - - - - - - 7 T - - - - - - - - --------Tom_------ ___=====T�--------TI---------TF---------TL---11J EL. = 929.0' EL. = 91f EL. = 9e EL. = 89 ----u------f----"--- ram=® ---------H------ BRICK SOLDIER / FACE BRICK ON COURSE PRECAST COLUMNS (TYP) PRECAST INSULATED GLASS SET IN SPANDRALS ALUM. FRAMES EL. = 929.0' EL. = 9150' EL. = 901.0' EL. = 895.0' SOUTH ELEVATION 1 / 16"=1 '-0" 1 I _ I 1 I ------------� O 816' 32 EL. = 929.0' EL. = V60 EL. = 901.0' EL. = 895.0' O 8' 16' 32 DASHED INDICATES I— — — — — — FUTURE PARKING I I LEVEL FOR PROOF OF PARKING (TYP) I I — — — h----------------17--------------------TI--------- ---� I (TYP) PRECAST SPANDRALS WEST ELEVATION 1 / 16"=1 '-0" O 8' 16' 32 DASHED INpICATE$ I I FUTURE PARKING LEVEL FOR PR OF PAWING (TYP) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —— —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------� �r------------------------------ ----=====o----=-------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---�� ---- ------------------------------- --- --- --------------------- ----------------------- -- ---------- (TYP) PRECAST SPANDRALS POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN sslos•s11s PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 Powers Crossing Professional Center City Submittal Set 4-01-09 PARKING GARAGE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PHASE TWO Issues and Revisions: City Submittal Set 04-01-09 I hereby certify that this plan,specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the.State of Minnesota. Jon R. Pope Date 04/01/09 Lic. No. 13041 Commission No. 75372-07230 Drawn by AW Checked by DM SHEET A6 NORTH ELEVATION 1 /16"=1'-0" 0 8' 16, 32