Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CAS-07_CARVER COUNTY (2)
p5 -6-7 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on January 20, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing on Wetland Alteration Permit for intersection improvements at TH 101 and CSAH 14 — Planning Case No. 05-07 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this,�Wmday o .2005. Notary Public K n J. Endt, D uty Clerk " ZKIMIJ�S$ENc-Minn�taxQhea.lan 31, 2070 gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-07 hwy 101 & pioneer trail wap\05-07 ph notice affidavit of mailing.doc SCANNED Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, February 1 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hail Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Wetland Alteration Permit to fill .11 acres of Proposal: Type 3 and .01 acres of Type 2 wetland for road improvement of turn lanes and signal construction Planning File: 05-07 Applicant: Carver County Public Works Project Northwest corner of intersection of TH 101 (Great Plains Location: Blvd.) and CSAH 14 (Pioneer Trail) A location ma is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Lori Haak at 952-227-1135 or e- Questions & mail Ihaak@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit Comments: written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online at htto://206.10.76.6/weblink the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/Industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonhepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Stall person named on the notification. Date & Time: Tuesday, February 1, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Wetland Alteration Permit to fill .11 acres of Proposal: Type 3 and .01 acres of Type 2 wetland for road improvement of turn lanes and signal construction Planning File: 05-07 Applicant: Carver County Public Works Northwest corner of intersection of TH 101 (Great Plains Project Blvd.) and CSAH 14 (Pioneer Trail) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: W What Happens 1 • Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Lori Haak at 952-227-1135 or e- Questions & mail Ihaak@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit Comments: written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at htto://206.10.76.6/weblink the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Weiland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersordrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Project Location This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a wrvey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a completion of records, infomation and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources; regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference W rposes only. The City des not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or drection or predsion in the depiction of geographic featuresa errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided Wmuanf to Minnesota Stares §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000y and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages. and express, waives all chins, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold ba"ess the City from any and all clans brought by User, ins employees or agents, or third parties whkh arise out of the users access or use of data provided, Project Location This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data locale t in various cry, county. state and federal offices anti other swrces regarding Me area shown, and is to be used for reference Wrposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Infomration System (GIS) Data used to prepare this amp are error has. and the City does WI represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting meawrement of defence or direction or preps in in the a%anon of geographic featuresti enors or dscrepances are found please contact 952-227.1107. The preceding discaner is plwided Wrwant to knnesota Stables §466.03. Subd. 21 (201 and the user of this mac acknowledges Mat the City stall not be liable for any carriages, and eVrearey v2ives all clanK, and agrees to tlaMd, inde rr iy, and hold hamYess the City from any and all Cents brought by User, its employees or agents, or third W rbes which case gut of Ne users access or use of dam provided. Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Wetland Alteration Permit for Intersection Improvements at Pioneer Trail and Highway 101 Planning Case No. 05-07 Wqrth qtropt�o m CU 0 Pineview Court -n 0 T o a M 0 0 a Pioneer Trail H 0y Q' ramble Project Location RICHARD S & KATHERINE S ASPLIN ROBERT & CHRISTIN E BOECKER SANALD E & 541 PINEVIEW CT 610 96TH ST W 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD J CWAYAYNA HALLA CHANHASSEN MN MN CHANHASSEN MN MN CHAS GREAT MN MN THEODORE B & KAREN K HASSE 630 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN MN ROGER G NOVOTNY 560 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN MN MN ROGER A & KIMBERLY A LEE 600 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN MN ANDREW T RIEGERT 620 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN MN JOHN & ANNA MAE MAKELA 9660 RASPBERRY HL CHASKA MN MN CITY OF CHHHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 www.ci.chanhassen.mn. us Project Location This map is neither a legally worded map nor a survey end is not intended to be used as one. This rrep is a whiPilmon of reconfs, infoniation and data located in various dry, county, state and federal ofiws and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference WNoses only. The City does hot wansnt that the Geographic Iron ation System (GIS) Data used to prepare this nap are error free, and the ON doss not represent that the GIS Data can be used for nar omonal, thss tlrfg or any other purpose reeuidng enacting measurement of distance or direction m pr won in the deplctiw of geographic featuresIf errors or discrepandes are fount Please contact 952-=-110T The preceding disclaimer Is provided pursuant to Minnesota Standee §M1 ,03, Subd. 21 (201)(f), and the user of this map scknowfedges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and erglresely waives all darts, and agrees to defend indemnify, and hold hamiess the City from any and all darns brought by User, its erryloyees or agents or third Parties which arise out of the user's awes or use of data provided Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, February 1 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Wetland Alteration Permit to fill .11 acres of Proposal: Type 3 and .01 acres of Type 2 wetland for road improvement of turn lanes and signal construction Planning File: 05-07 Applicant: Carver Countv Public Works Project Northwest corner of intersection of TH 101 (Great Plains Location: Blvd.) and CSAH 14 (Pioneer Trail) A location ma Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Lori Haak at 952-227-1135 or e- Questions & mail Ihaak@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit Comments: written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at htto://206.10.76.6twoblink the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Razonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commemiaUndustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersontrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included In the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Location Map Wetland Alteration Permit Intersection of Pioneer Trail and Highway 101 Planning Case No. 05-07 Pioneer Trail Project Location 2005 Planning Commission Agenda Items Schedule Possible Future Dunn Bros. Coffee (EDA meeting in January) Items (Date Church Road Subdivision (Spartz) Unknown) Advance Fitness (Uv Homeland) John Klingelhutz Subdivision (north of Lyman) Arboretum Business Park Restaurant Site Carlson/Brandt Subdivision (Dogwood) Bongard Subdivision (6500 Chanhassen Road) Minger (NW Galpin/Lyman) Variances on Lake Riley Blvd. (Sharratt Design) February 15 PC Old Business — Hidden Creek Meadows - Subdivision approval for a 214ot (March 14 CC) subdivision with Variances. The development proposal includes a Wetland Alteration Permit to permit the crossing of a creek and wetland with a public street. The site is 19.2 acres zoned Single -Family Residential, RSF, located at the ends of Pipewood Lane and Cartway Lane north of Highway 7. Applicant: D & G of Chanhassen, LLC. — Planning Case No. 04-31 Public Hearing — Ordinance Amending Zoning Ordinance regarding Electrical Substations March I PC Tentative — PC Worksession (March 28 CC) March 15 PC Public Hearing — Preliminary PUD, Town & Country Homes (April 11 CC) Public Hearing — Variance Gary Carlson 2 family dwelling Public Hearing — After -the -fact Variance to side yard setback to build a shed located at 7450 Chanhassen Road, Tim McHugh Application not yet received Public Hearing — Jerome Carlson Subdivision with variances (Pemtom?) Application not yet received April 5 PC Public Hearing — Subdivision, Site Plan with Variances and Land Use (April 25 CC) Amendment for Water Treatment Plant, West 79`" Street. Applicant: City of Chanhassen Public Hearing — Site Plan review for parking ramp and retail buildings located at the corner of future 212 and Lyman, SMTC Application not yet received April 19 PC (May 9 CC May 3 PC (May 23 CC May 17 PC (June 13 CC) June 7 PC (June 27 CC June 21 PC (July 11 CC) July 5 PC CANCEL MEETING DUE TO HOLIDAY? GAag=das\plannmg Com\2005\2005 planning commission ite .doc Location Map Wetland Alteration Permit Intersection of Pioneer Trail and Highway 101 Planning Case No. 05-07 Pioneer Trail Project Location December 30, 2004 William J. Weckman Carver County Public Works 11360 Highway 212 West Cologne, MN 55322 Re: S.P. 1009-14 (Road Improvements for T.H.101 and C.S.A.H 14 Intersection) Dear Mr. Weckman: The City of Chanhassen has received your application for a Wetland Alteration Permit on December 29, 2004. The City has scheduled the application into the February 1, 2004 Planning Commission meeting and the February 28 City Council meeting. Due to date the documents were submitted Staff will not be able to meet the review deadline of 60 days from original document submittal. This Letter is to formally notify you that the City is taking the additional 60 day extension to process this request as permitted under MN STAY 15.99. Should you have any further questions please feel free to contact me at 952-227-1106. Sincerely, Donald Asleson Environmental Resources Intern RELIIN F F I CE OR W tIN SHOW �I ,�- x © ° .PLOT 12 AJ�9 2 4 i O ° yoMn/DOT Bas in: Wet I and 1 Mn/DOT Basin Type: 2 DNR Designation: N.A. DNR Type: N.A. / ° ° NWI Type: N.A. o Basin Size: 10.5 cc 1 Total Encroachment: O. 01 cc ° © I * f �— $ Mn/DOT Basin: Wetland 1 Mn/DOT Basin Type: 3 ° I DNR Designation: N.A. v DNR Type: N.A. :- o NWI Type: N.A. Basin Size: 10.5 cc f Total Encroachment: 0.11 cc �--- _____________ —__--- 3 7 3 a t5 A 14 NO— ._---_—_--- — Wetland Impacts ' STATE PROJ. NO. 1009-14 (TH 101) SHEET NO. 1 OF 1 SHEETS N N V_ oqh 2N Q l 0 c W N_ Q Q W ti ti S Q 7� 4 Vi �§3 � W Y W � � � � Y d ti�x �,9� as a CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTH NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO.05-07 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 1, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a Wetland Alteration Permit to fill .11 acres of Type 3 and .01 acres of Type 2 wetland for road improvement of turn lanes and signal construction located at the TH 101 and CSAH 14 (Pioneer Trail) Intersection. Applicant: Carver County Public Works. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Lori Haak, Water Resources Coordinator Email: lhaak@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1135 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on January 20, 2005) Name of Local Government Unit: City of Chanhassen, 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Name of Applicant: Carver County Application Number: 05=07 Type of Application (check one): Date of Application: 12/29/04 ❑ Exemption Decision ❑ No Loss Decision ❑ Wetland Boundary and Type Determination ® Replacement Plan Decision ❑ Banking Plan Decision Location of Project: 25 116N R23W '/4 1/4 1/4 Sec. Twp. Range Summary of Project: Project proposal is for road improvements to the T.H. 101 and C.S.A.H 14 (Pioneer Trail) intersection. Improvements include the creation of left and right turn lanes without raised medians on all approach lanes, installation of a new signal with pedestrian indicators, construction of an 8-foot wide bituminous shoulder. An additional 1.5-foot gravel shoulder will be installed on the west leg of C.S.A.H. 14. Drainage for the improvements is proposed to be carried in ditches along the roadway. Impacts to wetlands include filling .11 acres of Type 3 wetland and .01 acres of Type 2 wetland for additional rite -of -way needed for the project. Project proposes to replace filled wetland activities through BWSR Road Replacement Program banking. You are hereby notified that the above -referenced application was made to the Local Government Unit on the date stated above. Comments on this application will be accepted until January 14,2005 decision on this matter will be made at the Feburary 1, 2005 Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting. Contact Lori Haak at (952) 227-1135 for details or changes to decision- making schedule. • • 11 f,0 101 �% ,, Water Resource Coordinator Title List of Addressees: Landowner Carver County 11360 Highway 212 West, P.O. Box 300 Cologne, MN 55322-0300 January 3, 2005 Date Members of Technical Evaluation Panel Mr. Brad Wozney, Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Page l of 2 101 and Pioneer Application for 1MLT 10000.doc 9/16104 Mr. Chip Hentges, Carver Soil and Water Conservation District Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization Mr. Bob Obermeyer, Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District Department of Natural Resources Regional Office Ms. Julie Ekman, Area Hydrologist DNR Wetland Coordinator Ecological Services Station 500 Layfayette Road, Box 25 St. Paul, MN 55155 Corp of Engineers Project Manager @ Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District ATIN: N: CO-R, 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1638 Individual members of the public who requested a copy Page 2 of 2 101 and Pioneer Application for HNALT 10000.doc 9/16104 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT w CARVER COUNTY December 29, 2004 11360 Highway 212 West PO Box 300 Cologne, MN 55322-0300 Phone (952) 466-5200 Fax (952) 466-5223 Donald Asleson Water Resources Intern City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: C.S.A.H 141T.H. 101Traffic Signal Dear Mr. Asleson: Administration Par6 Fngimmnng Highway Maintenance Surveying R Mapping Enclosed are the additional 15 copies of the completed Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects you requested. Also included are the original and 22 copies of the City of Chanhassen Wetland Alteration Permit. Please bill Carver County (Purchase Order #31231) for the amount of the permit. If you have any questions regarding this information, call me at 952-466-5200. Sincerely, Jennifer A. Wenko Civil Engineer Enc. � DEC 2 : Z004 CITY Cf L't',: a5-o-7 CITY OF CHANHASSEN oa' 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 DEC Z004 (952)227-1100 CITY Or CFI:;rdNA£" DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION APPLICANT: (AYVGY' l DUVIJ\l Rj%i)iG k6r k.S ADDRESS: 1136D HWI Z12 W %Ina r Mj 55322. TELEPHONE (Day Time) 952- 4loto - 520d OWNER: I dryer Lwni\/ fk.mic_ WOrks ADDRESS: 11-6bD H\�3 212 W (zjnD yje /' Mt 5532z TELEPHONE: 1 A5 - " (D6' Sat 1 S Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Interim Use Permit Variance Non -conforming Use Permit �/ X Wetland Alteration Permit Planned Unit Development* Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Notification Sign Site Plan Review* X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** - $50 CUP/SPR/VAC/VARNVAP/Metes & Bounds - $400 Minor SUB Subdivision* TOTAL FEE $ -32 `- e0 Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application -OR- the City can provide this list (Carver County properties only) for an additional fee to be invoiced to the applicant. If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this box ❑ Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. *Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/2' X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. *"Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME: S.P. 100 Cl — LOCATION: -Lni Y '$Gci'IOYt Ot C.S.A •H. Iy aYid TA. IOI LEGAL DESCRIPTION: � T.D• 25 0253 300 s 25 0 25 3) O Q TOTAL ACREAGE: 0.11 Acres o� Weiland Imnacied WETLANDS PRESENT: PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: _ X YES NO PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Eesiden iaO REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: L w Demi jj ResideircW REASON FOR REQUEST: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. _ va/!%C/Ainosie .- I-, /s2/a911Jtz Signature of q plicant Date Signature of Fee Owner Application Received on Fee Paid Date Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Thursday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. C\Documents and Settings\jwenko\Local Settings\Temporary Intemet Files\OLK%Development Review Application.DOC Jam Free Printing www.avery.com a AV6RY® 51600 Use Avery® TEMPLATE 51600 1-800-GO-AVERY Robert & Christin E. Boecker 610 96' Street W Chanhassen, MN 55317 Roger Novotny 560 Pineview Ct Chanhassen, MN 55317 Roger & Kimberly Lee 600 9e Street W Chanhassen, MN 55317 Richard & Katherine Asplin 541 Pineview Ct Chanhassen, MN 5531 Andrew Riegert 620 96's Street W Chanhassen, MN 55317 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 Date: January 3, 2005 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Lori Haak, Water Resources Coordinator Subject: Request for Wetland Alteration Permit for Wetland Impacts for Road Improvement of Turn Lanes and Signal Installation at the T.H. 101 and C.S.A.H. 14 (Pioneer Trail) Intersection. Planning Case: 05-07 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on December 29, 2004. The 60day review period ends February 27, 2005. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on February 1, 2005 at 7:00 p.m in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City M. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than January 19, 2005. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint/United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 13. Other - 14. Other- Pioneer Trail PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CARVER COUNTY December 20, 2004 11360 Highway 212 West PO Box 300 Cologne, MN 55322-0300 Phone (952) 466-5200 Fax (952) 466-5223 Lori Haak Water Resources Coodinator City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: C.S.A.H 14/T.H. 101Traffic Signal Dear Ms. Haak: Administration Parks Fnginm ing Highway Maintmnce Surveying R Mapping Enclosed are the original and six copies of the completed Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects. There is a wetland impact of 0.12 acres expected from this project. If you have any questions regarding this information, call me at 952-466-5200. Sincerely, n Jennifer A. Wenko Civil Engineer Enc. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION APPLICANT: utfye (u6i r. SIG k6 S ADDRESS: 11360 Nw� 212 W Gln4 WA 55322 TELEPHONE (Day Time) q 52- 4 1ab - 520b OWNER: ( dywr &Ln+q 7 k121iC W0&S ADDRESS: _11-!5 o b H\43 2.12 )J rn�oahe / t M►J 55a22 p TELEPHONE: 1 rJ Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Interim Use Permit Variance Non -conforming Use Permit �/ X Wetland Alteration Permit Planned Unit Development* Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Notification Sign Site Plan Review* X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost' - $50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $400 Minor SUB Subdivision* TOTAL FEE $ 325. ea Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application -OR- the City can provide this list (Carver County properties only) for an additional fee to be invoiced to the applicant. CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this box ❑ FEEL' 2 9 2004 Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEP' *Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8'/2" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. **Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME: S.P. I009 — LOCATION: Zv+elrscctlOYt pV C.-S.A.H. Iq and TH. lot LEGAL DESCRIPTION: f T.D. 25 D2S-J 300 T 2 rj 0 25 3) O p TOTAL ACREAGE: 0,11 Acres of Wei -lava d I maa c+ed WETLANDS PRESENT: PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: _X YES NO PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: 2esidert+;a) REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: LZW Delis 1 Resid&&dl REASON FOR REQUEST: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Vplicant Signature of Fee Owner Application Received on Fee Paid />2�� 9A tz Date Date Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Thursday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. C\Documents and Settings\jwenko\Local SettingsUemporary Intemet Files\OLK%Development Review Applicatton.DOC STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Request for a Wetland Alteration Permit to fill 0.11 acres of Type 3 and 0.01 acres of Type 2 wetland for road improvement of turn lanes and signal construction LOCATION: Intersection of C.S.A.H. 14 (Pioneer Trail) and T.H. 101 APPLICANT: William Weckman, Assistant County Engineer Carver County Public Works 11360 Highway 212 West Cologne, MN 55322 952.466.5200 PRESENT ZONING: n/a 2020 LAND USE PLAN: n/a ACREAGE: n/a DENSITY: n/a SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a wetland alteration permit to fill 0.12 acres of wetland along C.S.A.H. 14 (Pioneer Trail) to accommodate additional turn lanes at the intersection with Trunk Highway 101. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a wetland alteration permit is limited to whether or not the proposal meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the wetland alteration permit. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Location Map Wetland Alteration Permit Intersection of Pioneer Trail and Highway 101 Planning Case No. 05-07 16 m 0 T r Pioneer Trail Project Location Planning Commission Planning Case No. 05-07 February 1, 2005 Page 2 APPLICABLE REGUATIONS Sec. M 404. No net loss. To achieve no net loss of wetland, except as provided under section 20-416 of this article, or authorized by a wetland alteration pemvt issued by the city, a person may not drain, grade, excavate, fill, bum, remove healthy native vegetation, or otherwise alter or destroy a wetland of any size or type. Any alteration to a wetland, permitted by a wetland alteration permit must be fully mitigated so that there is no net loss of wetlands. See. 20407. Wetland alteration. (a) An applicant for a wetland alteration permit must demonstrate that the activity impacting a wetland has complied with all of the following principles in descending order of priority: (1) Avoids the direct or indirect impacts to the wetland that may destroy or diminish the wetland; (2) Minimizes the impact by limiting the degree or magnitude of the wetland activity and its implementation; (3) Rectifies the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected wetland; (4) Reduces or eliminates the impact to the wetland over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the activity; and (5) Replaces unavoidable impacts to the wetland by restoring or, if wetland restoration opportunities are not reasonably available, creating substitute wetland areas having equal or greater public value as set forth in Minnesota Rules 8420.0530 to 8420.0760. Exceptions to this part are calcareous fens, which are subject to Minnesota Rules 8420.1010-8420.1070. Sec. 20-408. Permit required. (a) No person shall drain, excavate in the permanent or semi -permanent flooded areas of type 3, 4, or 5 wetlands, or fill a wetland, wholly or partially, or otherwise impact wetlands without fast having a wetland replacement plan or other determination approved by the city. Draining, grading, excavating, filling, removing of healthy native vegetation, or otherwise altering or destroying a wetland of any size or type requires a wetland alteration permit. Activity in a wetland requiring a wetland alteration permit includes, but is not limited to: (1) Construction of new streets and utilities. See.20-409. Fylling. When a wetland alteration permit is issued allowing filling in a wetland, filling must be consistent with the Chanhassen Surface Water Management Plan and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. The filling shall not alter the hydrological patterns in the remainder of the wetland if a portion of the wetland remains unless exempted under section 20-416. Planning Commission Planning Case No. 05-07 February 1, 2005 Page 3 BACKGROUND Carver County is proposing the installation of traffic signals and the construction of turn lanes at the intersection of Trunk Highway 101 and Pioneer Trail (Attachment 2). The project is intended to reduce delay for the increasing traffic levels on T.H. 101/C.S.A.H. 14. Left -turn lanes at T.H. 101 and C.S.A.H. 14 should improve capacity and long backups that are current problems. WETLANDIMPACT Due to the addition of turn lanes on Pioneer Trail at the intersection with Highway 101, this project will impact 1 wetland basin in 2 areas for a total of 0.12 acres of wetland (Attachment 6). Wetland 1 is a Type 2/3 wetland that is approximately 10.5 acres in size. It is dominated by reed canary grass and cattail. This project proposes 0.01 acres of impact to the Type 2 portion of the basin and 0.11 acres of impact to the Type 3 portion of the basin. Wetland impacts are considered unavoidable and have been reduced to the extent practical given grading and safety considerations. The side slopes of the shoulder on the north side of Pioneer Trail have been made steeper (from a typical 6:1 slope to a steeper 4:1 slope) to reduce the footprint of the road and the amount of wetland fill. WETLAND MITIGATION The Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) is required to replace wetland impacts that occur as a result of public road projects (Attachment 5). Mitigation of wetland impacts will be accomplished through the BWSR Road Replacement Program and will be at a 2:1 replacement ratio. IMPACTS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES The project proposes tree loss and grading within an area on private property that is under a conservation easement. The applicant must request the City grant a conservation easement release prior to clearing and grubbing the site. Planning Commission Planning Case No. 05-07 February 1, 2005 Page 4 The project also proposes work within expanded right-of-ways for Highway 101 and Pioneer Trail. The applicant should work with property owners to obtain additional right-of-way prior to proceeding with the project. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Proposed erosion control must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Staff recommends that Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to the existing wetlands. Silt fence must be installed between wetland impact areas and the remaining wetland. In addition, tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. Erosion control blankets are recommended for all areas with a steep slope of 3:1 and an elevation drop of eight feet or greater. All exposed soil areas should have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets should include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. OTHER AGENCIES The applicant should apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit)) and comply with their conditions of approval. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Wetland Alteration Permit 05-07 subject to the following conditions: 1. k The applicant shall request the City grant a conservation easement release prior to clearing and grubbing the site. 2. The applicant shall work with property owners to obtain additional right-of-way prior to proceeding with the project. Planning Commission Planning Case No. 05-07 February 1, 2005 Page 5 3. All wetland impacts shall be mitigated through the BWSR Road Replacement Program in accordance with state law. 4. Proposed erosion control shall be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Type R silt fence shall be used adjacent to the existing wetlands. Silt fence shall be installed between wetland impact areas and the remaining wetland. 5. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed at the limits of tree removal. 6. Erosion control blankets shall be installed in all areas with a steep slope of 3:1 and an elevation drop of eight feet or greater. 7. All exposed soil areas should have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 8. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. 9. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit)) and comply with their conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact 2. Application received December 29, 2004 3. Notice of Public Hearing and Affidavit of Mailing dated January 20, 2005 4. Excerpt from Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420.0544, subp. H) 5. Project area and wetland delineation map 8'\Pbn12005 planning cases10547 hwy 101 $ pioneer trail wap%staff report 2-1-05.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Carver County for a Wetland Alteration Permit #05-07. On February 1, 2005, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Carver County for a wetland alteration permit. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed wetland alteration permit preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1) The property is located at the intersection of County State Aid Highway (C.S.A.H.)14 (Pioneer Trail) and Trunk Highway (T.H.)101 (Great Plains Boulevard). 2) The wetland permit meets the applicable standards from the city code: a) Any alteration to a wetland, permitted by a wetland alteration permit must be fully mitigated so that there is no net loss of wetlands; b) Avoids the direct or indirect impacts to the wetland that may destroy or diminish the wetland; c) Minimizes the impact by limiting the degree or magnitude of the wetland activity and its implementation; d) Replaces unavoidable impacts to the wetland by restoring or, if wetland restoration opportunities are not reasonably available, creating substitute wetland areas having equal or greater public value as set forth in Minnesota Rules 8420.0530 to 8420.0760; e) No person shall drain, excavate in the permanent or semi -permanent flooded areas of type 3, 4, or 5 wetlands, or fill a wetland, wholly or partially, or otherwise impact wetlands without first having a wetland replacement plan or other determination approved by the city. Draining, grading, excavating, filling, removing of healthy native vegetation, or otherwise altering or destroying a wetland of any size or type requires a wetland alteration permit; and f) When a wetland alteration permit is issued allowing filling in a wetland, filling must be consistent with the Chanhassen Surface Water Management Plan and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. The filling shall not alter the hydrological patterns in the remainder of the wetland if a portion of the wetland remains unless exempted under section 20-416. 3) The planning report #05-07, dated February 1, 2005, prepared by Lori Haak, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Wetland Alteration Permit. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this ht day of February, 2005. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Uli, Sacchet, Chairman g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-07 hwy 101 & pioneer trail wap4iindings of factAm 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 ,952)227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION APPLICANT: (AINCY- r4 AJ Fi lie U) S ADDRESS: A1360 HWy 212 W %ln4 c MN 55322 TELEPHONE (Day Time) Q 52- 41ob - 520O OWNER: LLtryer r LnFkb)i C. Wn&s ADDRESS: 11:5�b Hy�y 21Z YI i��loaw , MtJ 55322 pZ TELEPHONE: I rJ"/y(06_ Sot Is Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Interim Use Permit Variance Non -conforming Use Permit X Wetland Alteration Permit Planned Unit Development* Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Notification Sign Site Plan Review* X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** - $50 CUP/SPRIVAC/VARM/AP/Metes & Bounds - $400 Minor SUB Subdivision* TOTAL FEE $ Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application -OR- the City can provide this list (Carver County properties only) for an additional fee to be invoiced to the applicant. CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this box ❑ e- r,zszooa Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT "Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/2" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. **Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECTNAME: S.P. I00`/- LOCATION: Tn+r-seciion Ot C•S•A.H. Iq avid TH. jol LEGAL DESCRIPTION: i� T.D. 2 5 0253300 t 25 0 25 3) O O TOTALACREAGE: U.11 A afef> Oir Wetland WETLANDS PRESENT: _X YES NO PRESENT ZONING: A 2 REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Low _D%64-4 Vesideriiic1 REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: LZW L)CVIS111 RGSld&CAa1 REASON FOR REQUEST: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. l �U2/�Oasit .4-risrA+ r Signature of Aeplicant Signature of Fee Owner Date Date Application Received on Fee Paid Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Thursday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. CADocuments and Settings\jwenko\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Fi1es\0LK9\Development Review Applimnon.DOC ps -0"1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on January 20, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing on Wetland Alteration Permit for intersection improvements at TH 101 and CSAH 14 — Planning Case No. 05-07 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. DCjuty Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this +hday o 2005. L 1- Notary Public g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-07 hwy 101 & pioneer trail wap\05-07 ph notice affidavit of mailing.doc KIM T• MEUW►�� ��,y Public -Minnesota E�Bn,lgn 3f, p10 My Co°n SCANNED Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Tlme: Tuesda , February1, 2005 at 7:00 .m. Location: CityHall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Wetland Alteration Permit to fill .11 acres of Proposal: Type 3 and .01 acres of Type 2 wetland for road improvement of turn lanes and signal construction Planning File: 05-07 Applicant: Carver County Public Works Northwest corner of intersection of TH 101 (Great Plains Project Blvd.) and CSAH 14 (Pioneer Trail) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens W 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Lori Haak at 952-227-1135 or e- Questions & mail lhaak@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit Comments: written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at http://206.10.76.6/webiink the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject applicaton that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerclalMdustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonlrepresentative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have somethln to be included in the re or_lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Date & Time: Tuesday, February 1 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Wetland Alteration Permit to fill .11 acres of Proposal: Type 3 and .01 acres of Type 2 wetland for road improvement of turn lanes and signal construction Planning File: 05.07 Applicant: Carver County Public Works Northwest corner of intersection of TH 101 (Great Plains Project Blvd.) and CSAH 14 (Pioneer Trail) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens W 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Lori Haak at 952-227-1135 or e- Questions & mail Ihaak@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit Comments: written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at http://206.10.76.6/webiink the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim uses, wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a pan of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerdavindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson1representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and the application will be included In the report to the City Council. If you wish to have any correspondence regarding somethingto be Included In the report, lease contact the PlanningStaff person named on the notification. wrmp is neither a legally recorded mis nor a survey and is clot age Kled N be used as one. As crap is a conpiladon of records, inlomvGon and data located in vaddrs city, cony, stale and decal offices and Other sources regardw the area shown, and is as be used for relarerlee uposes My. The My does not vaurdnt Mat the Geographic Intomadon System (GIS) Data used prepare this map are enon free, and the City does not rei rss ct Mal the GIS Data can be used r rmpwsonal, haclang or arty mor poreme requiting eractirq meawren9nt of distance or recticn or precision in the depiction of geogreplic features. i errs or discrepancies are lomd ease contact 952-M7-1107. The preceding disdiamer is provided pursuant to ifrytesota mass §a66.03. Subd. 21 (20DO), and Me user of ttis nap acknoWedges And Me Diy shall nOt Gable for any darreges, arM uVressly waives a1 clans, and agrees to defend, Menniy, and Ad harrriess the City from any and an clams braght by User, its enployees or agents, or third tries *Och arise out of do users access or use ol data provided. Project Location Nis nap M neither a legally recorded mp nor a wn,ey and is nd Haended to be used w one. "is map is a completion of records, intamatim and data located in various city, cony, state and ederel offices end Other smrcas regarding the area stmwn, and M to be used W reference wrposes only. The City does not vranard that d e Geoprapfie Marretion System (GIS) Data used 0 prepae this map are emx free. and the City does roll represent Mat the GIS Data can be used or navigabona, bacmi, m any odw Wrprse reputing exacting measuremM of distance or irectim or pre imon in Ore depiction of geograpWc features, i errs or discrepancies are fonmd Aease contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is prowled Wrstard to itimesota katutrs §466.03, Subd 21 (2000). and the user of gis nap acknowledges Mat the City shall not w liable for any derr"es. and expmssly waves di dam and aWees to mter4 iMem,iy, and told hamiess the City from any ant all darts brought by User. its mpoyeas or apo0.s, or third tames which area tot d Ore users access or use of date provided Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Wetland Alteration Permit for Intersection Improvements at Pioneer Trail and Highway 101 Planning Case No. 05-07 RICHARD S & KATHERINE S ASPLIN ROBERT & CHRISTIN E BOECKER SA NALD E & 541 PINEVIEW CT 610 96TH ST W 10000 GREAT PLAINS BLVD J CWAYAYNA HALLA CHANHASSEN MN MN CHANHASSEN MN MN CHAS GREAT MN MN THEODORE B & KAREN K HASSE 630 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN MN ROGER G NOVOTNY 560 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN MN MN ROGER A & KIMBERLY A LEE 600 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN MN ANDREW T RIEGERT 620 96TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN MN JOHN & ANNA MAE MAKELA 9860 RASPBERRY HL CHASKA MN MN Nnnnesota Kute miu.u044 rage t,oi L Minnesota Rules. Table of Chapters Table of contents for Chapter 8420 8420.0544 REPLACEMENT FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS. A. Wetlands impacted by public transportation projects may be replaced statewide, only for wetlands affected in greater than 80 percent areas and for public transportation projects, except that wetlands affected in less than 50 percent areas must be replaced in less than 50 percent areas, and wetlands affected in the seven -county metropolitan area must be replaced at a ratio of two to one in: (1) the affected county; (2) in another of the seven metropolitan counties; or (3) in one of the major watersheds that are wholly or partially within the seven -county metropolitan area, but at least one to one must be replaced within the seven -county metropolitan area. Part 8420.0543, item A, subitem (5), does not apply to replacement completed using wetlands banking credits established by an applicant who submitted a complete wetland banking application to a local government unit by April 1, 1996. B. Replacement of wetlands may be accomplished under the rules for wetland banking as provided for in parts 8420.0700 to 8420.0760. C. For projects involving draining or filling of wetlands associated with a new public transportation project, and for projects expanded solely for additional traffic capacity, public transportation authorities may purchase credits from the board at the cost to the board to establish credits. D. A replacement plan for wetlands is not required for individual public road projects that result in the draining, excavating, or filling of wetlands for the repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement of a currently serviceable existing state, city, county, or town public road necessary, as determined by the public road authority, to meet state or federal design or safety standards or requirements, excluding new roads or roads expanded solely for additional traffic capacity lanes. This item only applies to authorities for public road projects that: (1) minimize the amount of wetland draining, excavating, or filling associated with the project and consider mitigating important site -specific wetland functions on site; and (2)(a) submit, at least 30 days prior to construction, project -specific reports, and any changes or addenda, to the board, the technical evaluation panel, the Commissioner of natural resources, and members of the public requesting a copy that indicate the location, amount, and type of wetlands drained, excavated, or filled by the project; http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/arulet8420/0544.htrW 1/21/2005 Minnesota Rule t542U.UJ44 rage 2 of 2 (b) convene an annual meeting of the parties required to receive notice to review projects to be commenced during the upcoming year; or (c) for minor and emergency maintenance work impacting less than 10,000 square feet, the public road authority may submit project -specific reports, within 30 days of commencing the activity, to the board and the technical evaluation panel that indicate the location, amount, and type of wetlands that have been drained, excavated, or filled. E. The technical evaluation panel shall review minimization and delineation decisions made by the public road authority and provide recommendations regarding on -site mitigation if requested to do so by the local government unit, a contiguous landowner, or a member of the technical evaluation panel. F. Those required to receive notice of public road projects may appeal minimization, delineation, and on -site mitigation decisions made by the public road authority to the board according to part 8420.0250. G. Changes to wetland impacts proposed by local road authorities in item D shall be reported to the board within six months from the date of the change being finalized. H. Except for state public transportation projects, for which the state Department of Transportation is responsible, the board must rer)lace public oad profprolect impacts to wetlands and wetland areas of public waters if authorized by the commissioner or a delegated authority, that are drained, excavated, or filled by local government projects on -existing roads. Replacement of the wetlands must occur in critical rural and urban watersheds. _ I. Public road authorities at their discretion may deviate from federal and state design standards on existing road projects when practical and reasonable to avoid wetland filling or draining, provided that public safety is not unreasonably compromised. The local road authority and its officers and employees are exempt from liability for any tort claim for injury to persons or property arising from travel on the highway and related to the deviation from the design standards for construction or reconstruction under this item. This item does not preclude an action for damages arising from negligence in construction or maintenance on a highway. STAT AUTH: MS s 14.06; 103B.101; 103B.3355; 103G.2242 HIST: 18 SR 274; 22 SR 1877; 25 SR 152; 27 SR 135; L 2004 c 228 art 1 s 71 Current as of 08104104 http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/arule/8420/0544.htmi 1/21/2005 OP *x* ll�• I 1 I ° •_J +°e `j I FF.ICE OR •, •• e • x • C� C�+T SHOW , ®. m • ��'� * 'd ,.•,y.> �- Cg S ,SEC 1 V �'�• • J ,1 m >E* m '� "J o f L -' OT �\�\ % � .—/r • of 1 x *4` • x * e. 1 � P 12-/�9 f 2 4 � - � g• (� x .�' e - � � n as ns et and 1 • \ e * :�i '® • �O' Mn/DOT Basin Types 2 •_ \ DNR Designations N.A. ° • • NWI TYP6+ N. A. • Basin Sizes 10.5 cc *,t `• °� Total Encroachments 0.01ad .. • - t o I O x n/DOT Basinr Wetland 1 h• ° * ❑ • n/DOT Basin Type+ 33 I • x DNR Designations N.A. • t DNR Types N.A. ° NWI Types N.A. Basin lzes 10.5 cc Total Encroachments 0.11 cc ' - - .•.® ram_-_______ •. k * * ,� -------------- .." Wetland Impacts .. -�—"--•�_ STATE PROJ. NO. 1009-14 ITH 101) SHEET N0. 1 OF 1 SHEETS March 10, 2005 CITY OF CIIANNSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 William Weckman, Assistant County Engineer En Chanhassen, MN 55317 Carver County Public Works 11360 Highway 212 West Rdm952.227.11 Phone: 952.227.1100 P.O. Box 300 Fax:952.227.1110 Cologne, MN 55322 Building Inspections Phone:952227.1180 Re: Wetland Alteration Permit for RoadwayImprovements at Pioneer p Fax 952.227.1190 Trail and Highway 101— Planning Case No. 05-07 Engineering Dear Mr. Weckman: Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 This letter is to formally notify you that on February 28, 2005, the City Council Finance approved Wetland Alteration Permit 05-07 subject to the following conditions: Phone: 952227.1140 Fas 952227.1110 Park& Recreation 1. If not addressed in the condemnation proceedings, the applicant shall request Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax:952227.1110 the City grant a conservation easement release prior to clearing and grubbing Recreation Center the site. 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 2. The applicant shall work with property owners to obtain additional right-of- Fax:952.227.1404 way prior to proceeding with the project. Planning 6 Natural Resources 3. All wetland impacts shall be mitigated through the BWSR Road Replacement Phone:952.227.1130 Program in accordance with state law. Fax. 952.227.1110 Public Was 4. Proposed erosion control shall be developed in accordance with the City's 1591 Park Road Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Type II silt fence shall be Phone: 952. 27.13100 Fax 952.227.1310 used adjacent to the existing wetlands. Silt fence shall be installed between 1 g wetland impact areas and the remaining wetland. Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Fax:952.227.1110 5. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed at the limits of tree removal. Web site 6. Erosion control blankets shall be installed in all areas with a steep slope of 3:1 www.d.charrhassen.ann.us and an elevation drop of eight feet or greater. 7. All exposed soil areas should have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Sloe Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geat place to live, work, and play. William Weckman March 10, 2005 Page 2 These areas include any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 8. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. 9. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase 11 Construction Permit)) and comply with their conditions of approval. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. If you have any questions, please contact me at (952) 227-1106 or by email at dasieson@ci.chanbassen.mn.us. Sincerely, Don Asleson Natural Resources Technician DA:ktm gAph n\2005 planning ca \05-07 hwy 101 & pioneer trail wapVeaer of approvalAm MEMORANDUM 0 TO: Lori Haak, Water Resources Coordinator C�I pl�lip FROM: Kelley Janes, Utility Superintendent ins` �OF CACSEN U DATE: March 1, 2005 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Curry Farms Drainageway I Easement Sanitary Sewer Administration Phone:952.221.1100 Please find this memo in response to the questions raised by the Fax:952227.1110 representatives of adjacent property owners to the Sanitary Sewer running through Curry Farms, north of Pleasant View Road, east of Powers Building Inspections Boulevard. We have researched past issues with this line and have found the Phone: 952 227.11 BO Fax:952227.1190 following incidents associated with the easement. Engineering Approximately 5 years ago, a water main ruptured underneath the PFax:952.227.11700 Fax:952.227.1110 footings of the Keystone retaining wall bracing the trail on the east side g Y g g of Powers Boulevard, at the intersection of Pleasant View Road. Finance Potable water flowed down the drainage way to Christmas Lake. Phone:952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 • There is no record of any Sanitary Sewer Overflows or backups on the Park a Recreation line. The line was monitored twice a year during the construction of homes in Curry Farms to prevent construction debris from entering the •PFax:9522.27.1110 Fax:952227.1110 lift station located at Holly Lane. This is now routinely performed Recreation center 2310 Coulter Boulevard once every 2 years if it is not slated for cleaning within the 3 year Phone:952.227.1400 cleaning cycle. Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & • 3 years ago, the line was inspected for the possible application of a Natural Resources permanent vent to strip gas before the Lift Station. This was not Phone.952.227.1130 implemented. Fax:952.227.1110 Public works • Prompted by this inquiry, the line was inspected by Utility Operators 1591 Park Road on 2-28-05, and no defects or evidence of overflowing was found. Phone:952.227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 In conclusion, the Utility Department can state that the Sanitary Sewer line in Senior Center question is operating within normal parameters, and will continue to be Phone' 952.227.1125 cleaned and monitored within the City's 3-year maintenance program. Fax: 952,227.1110 • Web Site www d.chanhassennn.us The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A 1peal place to live, work, and play. ARTICLE VII. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT Sec. 19-140. Surface water management utility established. Surface water management shall be operated as a public utility pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 444.075. (Ord. No. 132, § 1, 9-24-90) See.19-141. Definitions. The following words, terms, and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Surface water management budget is the annual budget approved by the city council for surface water management including planning, monitoring, capital expenditures, personnel, and equipment. Surface water management fee means the quarterly charge for each parcel of nonexempt property in the city for the management of surface water. Utility factor means the ratio of runoff volume, in inches, for a particular land use, to the runoff volume, in inches for a one -third -acre residential lot, assuming a two-inch rainfall and soil conservation service (SCS) "type B" soil conditions. (Ord. No. 132, § 1, 9-24-90) Sec. 19-142. Surface water management fees. (a) The utility factors for various land uses are as follows: Classification Land Use Utility Factor 1 Single-family and rural residential 1.00 2 Agricultural 1.00 3 Undeveloped 1.00 4 Medium density residential 2.24 5 High density residential, industrial, office, institutions, (churches, schools, government buildings, hospitals) 3.34 6 Business/Commercial 4.28 7 Parks, cemeteries, golf courses, arboretum 0.45 8 Parking lots as a principal use 6.14 (b) The surface water management fee for single-family residential property shall be calculated as follows: (1) Percentage of runoff in the city attributable to single-family residential property; (2) Multiplied by an amount equal to twenty-five (25) percent of the surface water management budget; (3) Divided by the estimated total acreage of single-family residential property in the city; and (4) Divided by three (3). (c) The surface water management fee for each tax parcel classified 1, 2, and 3 is the single-family residential fee. The fee for classifications 4 through 8 shall be calculated as follows: Fee for a single-family residential tax parcel multiplied by the utility factor multiplied by the acreage of the parcel. (Ord. No. 132, § 1, 9-24-90; Ord. No. 147, § 1, 5-20-91) Sec.19-143. Credits. The city council may adopt policies for adjustment of the surface water management fees. Information to justify a fee adjustment must be supplied by the property owner. Adjustment of fees shall not be retroactive. (Ord. No. 132, § 1, 9-24-90) Sec.19-144. Exemptions. The following land uses are exempt from the surface water management fee: (1) Public right-of-way. (2) Lakes. (Ord. No. 132, § 1, 9-24-90) Sec. 19-145. Payment of fee. Surface water management fees shall be involved quarterly. The amount due as shown on the invoice shall be payable on or before the twentieth day of the month in which the invoice is issued. A penalty of ten (10) percent per quarter shall be added to all accounts that are not paid in full by the due date. The penalty shall be computed on the unpaid balance not paid by the due date at the time each quarterly statement is prepared. Any prepayment or overpayment of charges shall be retained by the city and applied against subsequent fees. (Ord. No. 132, § 1, 9-24-90) Sec. 19-146. Appeal of fee. If a property owner or person responsible for paying the surface water management fee believes that a particular fee is incorrect, such person may file a written appeal with the city clerk. Appeals will be heard by the city council. No adjustment will be made to the utility factor for property classifications 1, 2, and 3. (Ord. No. 132, § 1, 9-24-90) Sec. 19-147. Certification of delinquent fees. If a surface water management fee is not paid within three (3) months after a billing is issued, the city council may certify the amount due, together with penalties, to the county auditor to be collected with other real estate taxes on the parcel. (Ord. No. 132, § 1, 9-24-90) Sec. 19-148. Surface water management fund. A separate fund shall be maintained for surface water management fees and expenditures. (Ord. No. 132, § 1, 9-24-90) Asleson, Don From: Asleson, Don Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 8:39 AM To: Haak, Lori Subject: Mike Casanova Information Lori, To summarize what we know about the 720 fund; The fund began collecting quarterly fees on 11/19/90 with Ordinance 132 (3.22 per quarter). On 12/12/94 the fee was increased from 3.22 to 5.00 per quarter (Resolution 94-136A). Danielle is currently putting together annual revenue and expenditure reports from 1994 and up due to a change in the computer system in 1994 and the inability to gather the data from previous years. She said that we are only required to keep records for 7 years, but she will provide him with whatever she has. -Don CITY OF CHMI MSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227A100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone, 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952,227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassenmo. us Storm Water Revenue Expenses 2004 260,096.31 285,657.88 2003 249,830.63 200,774.87 2002 245,288.37 220,418.44 2001 240,100.91 168,104.76 2000 258,153.28 149,295.03 1999 219,754.90 347,706.41 1998 224,191.32 269,488.89 1997 214,283.71 199,088.16 1996 204,629.86 221,971.04 1995 195,199.22 271,806.58 1994 149, 693.32 120, 546.05 1993 139,917.87 115,934.26 1992 135,430.37 239,978.79 1991 135,749.49 76,462.43 Totals 2,872,319.56 2,887,233.59 The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beaulilul parks. A great place to live, work, and play. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Markel Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax:952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone. 952,227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning A Natural Resources Phone: 952,227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site wwwci.chanhassen.mn.us Storm Water Revenue Expenses 2004 260,096.31 285,657.88 2003 249,830.63 200,774.87 2002 245,288.37 220,418.44 2001 240,100.91 168,104.76 2000 258,153.28 149,295.03 1999 219,754.90 347,706.41 1998 224,191.32 269,488.89 1997 214,283.71 199,088.16 1996 204,629.86 221,971.04 1995 195,199.22 271,806.58 1994 149,693.32 120, 546.05 1993 139, 917.87 115, 934.26 1992 135,430.37 239,978.79 1991 135,749.49 76,462.43 Totals 2,872,319.56 2,887,233.59 The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Oil L4 w Ej X 42 0 z En i7f z - �690 fi . P 4 0 is FY Eb Q�_O� 0 i NEE 2 8 WS 1 *Ivd | \ § / § B §`ol j � k ; ! ; § ...§)...§ .. k ) § : - ._:. |!; ! § \ | B" \ )) ® 2= \ § � � # � | | ( � � m ) � one; ; 3;;( - - ) !!!! ||;; § . �Sfl� t T-BUR -� 168000 S r $ a r gn A .n Z s r Paz € aa. at o i no's a �;.. " In 09 cl A r i:Eg' 6 55 dgWaid ;iss WE 1€ ..�a i r. SAS U OflO�Sfl / � � I a #iF Sw i i / i ObU 000 j O ; E3/ S'PM6 VIIYliGV31I03/ - Wl I®]WP✓P1MN.I6�WW53G4Y '3T'N31/l I Hbd 30 0 P ,i '3.. 10 Xtl M J?b :z� �gw I a � I � I I I 1 a I �ml I I I g a ¢ o 00 I I w w o� Z I I 0 U o z O o z ~ V y 0, Q W m w J yyy O O O O Q M Z O 0 X r I r ++ i I 1 Y 168500 i ' o _ F I I W A a_ i o r O W 9 2 € 1 $ r / = i I o Mu m o 09�4 I4 i r 3 W€ i m I / ZOL J]8-NrrN U35rM136'/03LOrd DVS IRAVJAWiW�INP6C0'W�x9'S3W5 '3mx3YJ 9 xl�d C �xIQxO '3xYx Nldl Ctl1A '. t?b19Y1 J" `= ^gw Z in o d N " N W n LL LL O � F a! Q O I Q �- I J w 1 � m ^ H ZO 2 0 8r U o 4 € 3 Z x W,; X o >: - x�z 00 W e � s e 3y ui g id as Cg7 z 8 :S"'rO a 5 9500 `3. d yy w za9 d 5 oeQ I IN \ \ ° i : it I 1 I I I O I I \ � I Q I o � m m o I { I l u �x ¢ c' 10 I ILL U I I m `J I u i I in I I� ��, �3� �vr�„rom,.swwn�rtl�.coawrtic -JJ I\ o *~ «~. ° « ¥ . }~ V �\ * o « * ate * -x« -x a ~ « -X R ------------ « \ � o \ \ '\ S. / ;( )§ , ■,]� � j�j�� ;z9 |/ ((3\gi ) \ ) °\ 2 � ® e o . �_ + �e g/ , c , �----- o -- -- }� �I2 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALLATION SLOPES FLATTER THAN 12 SLOPES 12 TO Ill CHANNEL AND DITCH APPLICATIONS (1.2 STAPLES PER SO TO) ([.7 STAPLES PER SO YO) (3.5 STAPLES PER SO TO) � CHECK SLOT N ' Ix % AM i M L it j CHECK SLOT REQUIREMENTS 1. alas IN(m fir S IME TIF16H. 1. INTI 01n1ET Imo WINE TFTTIW PERI1ETEA. 1. STMIE i/iY.ET EVENT 1 FWi /Kl6Ia THE COTTON OF TE TIQ91 STANDARD 6.5FT BLANKET STAPLING PATTERN wtfFlu TRENCH SITN 01L nu msacr. GENERAL BLANKET INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS 1. 6IA4,Er6 WIaAa BE IAIa fuw F TO THE 01I 1001 6 "m FUN. 1. OIWAF ffl Y T SIp1P M6 A SLOPES FLATTER THAN 12 SLOPES 112 TO UI CHANNEL AND DITCH APPLICATIONS MINI" OFN INaE6. (1. 2 STAPLES PER SO YO) 11.7 STAPLES PER SO YO) (3.5 STAPLES PER SO YO) z. NloIN AMg M �NLOP OF N1KIwEa z.e• 00,40RmE M. 6TANY nano WFNM .. ; . i_P'_ EVFRY 1.a FETT. 5 m N 1. M IWFRU6i SLIMTi 6 nl fi N'ftICRTlp6 TH I I IRr In R pN 0.ai. If ATER. UMrN ILI [S In PT pl 1• ;• •I I N• % i % N 141" IN6FAr 6LMNEl SAE. W.ar 1/J GMN THE WrrM OF TE 0.aPE. S. TIE MIFFING aF EMI R IN nL QITp APn.ICNTI016 NKT START IN A % N IT N KI CIEIX 6Lar. I -Y NI-7 x STANDARD BFT BLANKET STAPLING PATTERN 1 a1 : DRAWN BYIPSO I CHECKED By. O74 1 CERTIFIED BY 016—� WC29 LIC. NO.11Ui-DATEt 2c-or I STATE PROJ. NO. 1009-14 (T.H. 101) SHEET NO.19 OF 39 SHEETS g g 8 8 3s `y g3g3g3 �g a 3 `a 8 S � n o.. .a. F_.. w7S9eee'aa�e oa�a W< o "oia�< w R w 33 G W t M J �n'a VNu N w Aga:3�g" 5sg cs y6 19 '3e 3 `SHO c� Z y f VI ~ W yl P N xO< 3g iwMEE < o HIP- w _ ira h:ap 2 I 2 4 0C« 2 m rr ¢ 9 H F 01 m g 4, o.a grey o do c 2..« 2. N O rl rILSIRWII F � a N � y y Z w O!•� Q yE p � fOs � � a I 9 �� !08 o ao g�Op Y d .u. ✓ � � 3- b < i � g I � gq CND I ggE ��+yEy 4 _0.6 i B 8 Bb 0 u z5 e r a ®Fiz o zo q 9 »�J F rexmla k * 3 1•ro 3 3 H »Ie'� � ss � � � � 9 ��� u£ YI w M A:.BD � �dd E■�■ m i 1 a68 � .�. w u �F�IIF ." W x i 1•W f )1 K� MM V y3 1 p 5 ■ a 6u � OJ o s n YF M3 b ® iG� 8 a MERE! .,^eP 6gig� Rs wr 3 B 3 j11' I �j Nis $ 3 !$� II II RB29 I B�L G z I1L 1 N�S�a"? F $ o_ 5 O ✓� HS y 44' � � n� qE�a S ? �� SG` 8 `s I 9•aE � � 6� JJ``VV3I g I x F m a i YYY� ✓ a 9 do i t r yCz � g9 ypyp .~��. : T'~„ @a I � 4 8 S F S 0¢ W5-- y 6�68 TI i S 11LU �� I u Q 3 i�eeGF a� 5 = S �=5 9.iry RpENYKH O35Nt3tl/p31I01d ukngslNLdPNNG6W/Nq✓LaW.KIT'S `3/11'N3]/J I NIYd uY'INJ]Y '3T'M /OM 01/1311 +. L]Ylip I± @�W F� W �y �^ ah ISi.LllaIDa t p a:n Y391✓0R 6 U � �� g ma.n l>rrs 8 J it ``� •^ °"___' Y V U W S • U m0 _ . � O O J3 ✓j al..m oW�S� �§ a� m p� a a -aln- op aS g � S gg a i s4 �✓ 3ma. � ��@g8�€ I a1GiIdIK Q-mr\�-mm\md ✓<m�t y~j W Z O — a Z _r ¢ O w ti ti H N p .X �z • • .. @ ease€ 1 J g io w a �i ti 3� r ; wo: 6 � •� a o� u w sd — � e „Q NFf/ SR$-M'ttZ 035IrtM/Q31lOb WUArIxNPMNeT.w/NpWxMU1M.KF3 '3mx3XJ f Nlvd w<'Ix¢YO •3mx 1.U1 W131I '. l]•l5q | j � ` LO ml k , .Hill d / ) \§/( / ! 55Je= mM PS A y E A 2 \!//r � ! \|4R 2 §; \ �g- ,( & § . 4\ % \ r ) § |k) ` \ | !■ f a� ;J §■ � � He §\ - � ) � 4 o 8 a s Ll N �u F W jd � S nA w q a J r Y y x r rQ yy ow w six H m u :d = s 15 o n :ii'l og riy y ry mo_ $Lji � � �{ 6gp i. wr o d N -G8� 3 ge- FS i MV SgR- rW N351A3N/03110]d Y uIvd �'iH0'V '311IM 101dl \ ! ! - ! st: \ ! q )■ § » §r r �\� ■ � ��.� ! )(/k ( )2 6.w ] � —r=-------------- -- SZ ---- Y_ a N O� ' II a w V C 0 00 OOz O w 000 000 O j n �iru-xrrox nanna/na„ma wrw`�rmmawxnw,usarrxnlvu�ls3ms •3mx3ry x ulra ,wli.6 p '3mx JP l WI m I] 11 I 1 I _ 1 I I 1 1 1 1 o I I NI- 0 I \ \ I I 1 I1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I o I I � � I i Irn snawr Jffi aann�io3ua (10 I I I 5 9500 I I I I 1 I I{ I I I I I i I f e I `JI i I m I I I n I X 55 008 I ; I Irorv.`�encaruwwvsmvuwxsms •3mx3pe x xira tp�nsmc �3mx tmdl Wl3x '- 1]Y15p \ * / -x -x « ` e �x -Y -x a -x | * a « * « ° / x o « o « d • e ` % « & � `oi0°0 o.E § epo m Z, a ° ------------- °® .) b! \ ` \) \ a I 4! | | | § ! . 7t.��,§� !!.h||| ° ,! § !!� 3 0 o §\ 0 0 Y ® � 00 °/ r------ , ,®-- !f ' 0 <;§ \ 0\ \� S `J�I I � m � I I N 0 0 w w � I I i i I � z 9 �- 0-51.1 m g w ` P pig Mw / F ° o oc N V I :E:k: xko�3 m s o w w I � 1 I N A b oo i I x -NE R ' of ° 1 — um. 0 N rs: _pl: aso _ .so 088�____ aW „3m _ _ _ _ �o _ 9 -8= 2 2 ___ ann ennnn.nnn ox w.,nninnnnn,n ,nnnn nn c9 o Soo88�80'�0=-:=_te"-"o8000g x x xxx x xxx T[l �-NYfN 035/M1�/03L(Ib 0 0 0 om o 0000m om o 0 0 6 m o 0 0 O m 00 x - /p p m m mm i u W _ i 2 _ e a - m m o _O w ,O O m m / Ogyg _ V xxx mm m/ Kg o00 , O O oom m m nag OCO % 000 o O OOOOOm O ' / o 000-o Ntpµ{0',l5pygiNM\Y9/WtldTYeOW9'9U5 •amNnv •Nara .R/.] 16.U'0 TWN 107e ON13n 1. 1?H v D D pD O O \ < O \ ' O* D # # X x # f\ 1 # # 0 / i 0 k II 0 # D O O D D 0 0 0 p0 000 0 0 00 0 0 00 p 0 0 p 0 II 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Il0 . D 0 00 000 ° 0 o o Oo 0 0 0 0 o I I 0 0 000 O 0 DDD II. p O 000 00 O 00 00 p p O pD o o oil 0 00 O O p 11 ooD p- D 0 po 0 00 ______________---------------------------- II 0 0 0 0 p0 00 _ y\Ifa o- D o poop 0 +p°0 00 O 000 00000 O +�• O 00 000 00 00 O'p O p p p000app Op 000 p o p o 0 Q D x opo 0 o pogo p x p 0 0 O o 000 00 p 0 00 DO o p %acu. 0 0 000 0 0 O 0 ,bhbet:etdcu ,caltlx ;M###Kltyku# Op p o uWM;GM# ## yxE �x#rRRRxitMM �c.n vru-..ru nw.vma..�r.. uecmar�mwsxwnm�lunvr»vrw sa dUS%60:v0 '3 m 1T wl1 ". 1Jb U #IN u§u �u I loll Z O H W W - - E_ - O :D_ m�u W i a s a - EE EEEE E O �s S 77. 3 y IS asa e S j N W N g � m N E — g Q r t 1 cc o'n WP _ ---i: 1 1 g � 3 0 tg- gn „ \ dE�s 8i :. d tl$ E I N� I Wag _— EE` __ _ o mo<r.rmwa,n.nminnw.csw� :arv.zn, . u pTY.Wyp 3MM J/Jyl QIl3� •. l?M15R1 8 J Z O — H _ 8`0 S H _ O Q $< J Q] a -> w zF a=� "459� h x "S -__ = e o ^' w ti W ri ' Z - O o - t g� n l..: f t: a is y W o rL _ W Q o r � 1 0 I. a 1' w :.:.: _.... 10 I Q PPMOJV �3T'M JOldl Ob13Y1 `. L)b1S0 z. 0z cr ]\ . §3 ] \mw \ ,, \�( /k. . ._ � �) e . . (§|; /.§!§ _ .. . !! |i \} \ ! ;! § )\|; - - , /,\|§ .. .. . 3| ;. :\ ...|1,,,,!!!!!I E!\\} )§ § � / § \)\\))\)}� §§� � .... ;l;;§;;;! §i F N - w N m 0 Z J o m m 2 ! � z d < _ IpZQpHWY F`I 3 `d: X':an 1. 5 9 6 x «1 fi < r N 1. `o o 9 .w. w N J N N 0 U I s 44 m - o I a G =IS w E � 'm W 0 z s 0 9w 50H-xrr18 V3su3aN3ttOb WroTIKOpPNfNxrSP'nMN45.Lv3 '3mx3nJ I ulyd xw'x,[mx '3mx LJM Oat3n `. I?YISp !§ ���; ■ � §; [ m 4 �~ Am |§§:| , 7 )•! \ § } ) |§\§) §\§ & |;;>, ■ ! , § § ga : . \ ) � \� (| }; 5\3 / •� ! � |z _ 2 � § d U. � § ). [§: 2 K ; \ -----w4 ... ------ -------- - � / . . a. . NY1. M. )\ § \; &_ |, | } ;/! (| . § 7 . \ E § Bi »§M \|/ /4\ §k 7 7 E /\#Rl2J,|; | . e e e �\/(\/\(\ \ �.w .. ;|( .. / (� \ { " , 4 EEA ©! .. |{( _ /\\ � + § ®§ e|; ,ci _ �§ : 3` A. mG If » 4 �y \ )9 \\Eiji �\ |\ : • {\ / � : ' )o ,! . / §§ \ !\ / \ ' G w -§§ �- / � \[ �� / � ) ) • � ! ! «. z ( § cc R.\ }� \} w \ as ) . | ,! e " ) t! &,( }\ �\j ;; 15 _ uwz b\ § m , § 2 r� \ ; o §= - -_IZBN ` « / ;_ \ )§ §I . §4a - \ \ §z % _2'�w - m [� 2 q a� /§ w!" §�/ - 2 ! = m( §; § \ § / / 1. _ _� !0 m G% ( g \ . � A| )1 § % &q 4.1Z.1 AA;Am &i q| e e e eee § ; ;III I I;) ) (§ ( \\/\/\\\\\ i I N ... __ x i I 1 I ' 1 1 1 4 i , - i �.. i r - i' _ -� ' r -- r — - x 0 1 I 1 : _;ll� I - i - -'-- - ' -i'- - -- i ...... - - a I: _ — _ ___ — I rc -- —_ i :1 I R.... t is ' 1 t 6M SOGBrYYf9l 'U39.taY/031U1]d IgvAr(@�P9+'+SStl011We11�MXIIM:WV�:O�Y953PT •3111'N3bf f Nl✓d - ArR�*P+6sRYH1 '31MN IOM ®/1311 �. L]tl154 1 t r i r o i I I r o t I 1 _ P 1 Jw 1 i , F ml r' 4 Y 1 Y't 'F • Y is � O O r _ zi:t i 1 11: is t I is 1 r_ ' 3 T , I: 1 is i I : • t I ' I 1 1 r. t i:" I r I ' esw saa wr-w a3snwMg3 nve�-�mvwnwnmuv+wuwvtm+�vw.rs3 rmxaue s wne �-(BPPV+s+.OWI 3MM 101d/ QILA . J3Ll5U i io 1 11 I N I I 1 1 I j i- 1 in Ili � � I i 1 1 I i I O ` 1 � ' Ia .o FS �• i 1 I Q N w m I Itti .: I I I ..III .. f c II I� I II I I 1. II q 11 f I 1 III I 1 �I II II. { If I C: 61 n:>I v�2-nbrd/'p]i'/�tl/03LIOb IWI fRA'F�gNl\PNlV^WI/`M®'gMJ53OYS �3XYM3Xd1 N1Yd .d�CQ MW4f/qNl '311YX JD)d/ N1311 • . L]WISO O B 01 i -Wr Of 035I d/031 7d 3M 19 9 Nltld q� p�nsp6saryNl '3mn ldldl ml3n ' . y d<w 1 e 'I 1 ; 1 i 1 4 I 1 1 , , , 1 ' 1 1 � 1 r 1 r , 1 1 I I I 1 I I: { r : : Imo- , , 0. t .� •Y: it 6SH SOCB-.wrvB, a35,n3LiC31tOtd vJpdr�u{ryts♦pu.v:l+. s.'::v.♦y:�H1.V:Xwy53PS 'imx.;,. 5 w. /lr($ufvpsapNl '311YN �0]GI Ctl1311 � . 1?Y15q ir 1 — , , 1 II I — — • i C- "" :ii I .. I ' - - -- �- - - - -- bb - 1 j: I 0 bib/ 50.Y+Wf81 p351hitl/03L01d �oFrW'�'fw+i'�RYN(4YH1VM�/Np�M411`}'$�`5 '3T'M3l/J 9 Nl�d RrCB^�Alrs'+pH! '31Nx (flidr W13H = . 13b15q I '.:. 1 _ 1 r - K i .. 1 O i ' 1 I __ __ _ � i : _ 1 1 • -- —ice 4-4 TT O 1 .I 6 N ,. ^ g f s k k'. - m __" y F _ a 1 T a ¢� T w� • I i � LL � � L 1 _ — 1 ._ _..... ._._ .... ... 69H SP]Z M1Yl 91 p3LA3N/03llOH '-mVN-C6H'I AS>.1YN14yHNMNJXMW4CNM.YSU s'3MN31f/ I Nltld W"WNMIatO'HI �3NYN lObl ON13N '. I]W15p 1 1 i Q N F ' I x y :1 ".: 1: • 11 1 f 1 � u'j 1 1 i Ix m I. i .. ... 1 f • i 1 w v 1 ' t 1- 1 1 1 — N µ R 1'. 1 1 a $ .. n I 1 77 1- 1 it it r 11 1 i 11 JL 1- i i •: r 1 1.. i I I , 1 1 r 1_: 1 1 1 i 1'- 65M SIX%-MI-0I II3YAiN/O3t101d 1lOC'�ws 4ss•�F1vpAil. Jwl/'eASS1P'A.SA'3 9111' , i —71 .�[6KPV+i'�.fYMl •3MM lUMI O/LTI'. LYtl1S0 i nn n I � ' i. 1 1 1 I i i s 1 t 1 1 I 1 i- I E i 1 i 1 1 M, 4� 41 a , i• litT. y 1 1 i I — —r _ • a� -ST 1 ,yn E.I i : 1 ,� 1 1 TEA 11 I" i.: i i 1 I AGO,1 D5•DI 5•"Ak-NdPBI O35lM1iM/031fo1a �PNrlgwpyss�MM'SNIMVSNNUIINIOSN`+GgJS]P:S 9 -n_ s N:vi Gtl13n :. llp/ISp i i K W i i:l 1 ,.: . , -- H Q U 1 O� O O O Z O C a m 1 - - - --' - 1 1 i _ 1 14H SCB-M'hi 9351A3bR3lJ0U �V.�OP�xx6mNxFIMMSTv^A�WMJSIkS 'FVM3AJ f Hlvd .VrR.u'ANs/1/M'SJ `3nYx 101dl p/13n :. 1]PIISV W� r r r n 0 - x - . . ': :.:.. :.: ...... y I m 0 0 n e 1 : 1 . yo - Y's F — s. - T j t 3 1 `� I •� m .T 1 J- _ 1 1 1 1 , , r. i $S'N SLYUUYvlfr i)3SIM13E'/U3L(Ob rY'Y:d•-i2WPm+MHYiJiHI/$JSYW(NNKg1.MM9530F5 r3rMMiL) 1 N1Yd N"OZUP4*r�NNYSJ �31MY lO1dl @/13Y r� l]q/1SJi F i s : �2i O � N X _ Z W_ i 0 0 0 'o n ------------ R.: i ". .4 .. ... ....... r n. 1 F � W.— r ' l E 1 SSM S2C-Mfpl a]YA3!//p311Qid VNrl2'�%�/+%�MMSN4A'.VSrMiW.OS�'S �3T'M3➢J 1 Hl�d .N-(QKgyR�Iul'$J +]11yM 1Q1d1 Cb'1311 ' . 1]P/15.0 N �o = N x _ r x — w I:LI N 1 U I .+ 1 i O n.: F N i •n 4 n.. Ilg A li$ ... I .7 �r _ q •4._. . _ _ _ .'� _ _ _ r' 1 r � w Y- M I I I.. • r I 1 1 ' a.�,�. - - - a i< 1 i SSN SGB-M'M1g p39A3tl/p31JOU kVW+L@�M°]f0iNw5NIM'SN'^MYUV.PF�Tq'W.1531T'S 311YN3UJ 1 H1Yd W'd'aNWry�MM'SJ '3wYM 10]M Ctl13w �. d]P/d5q 55>1 9=WI BI d351n]brt131:0]J •/xCNb' ^+'ANs]bIMSTbIMSN+VUIWp M953P•S •3MNil/J f Nlfd prrglspvptryxry5q •3mx 1QIdl b/1311 • . 1:Ytl15/J ' 0 �— }} I 1 , `• i I i 1.. , O I � 1 i 1I 1: - - - t I ; i 1` 1 1 11 I. SSW SIX2Wrw i]3LA3tl/03LOH'�WHrW�W+*O/MSNY,/PJ+VaI/VOBC�MY9S3P'S •3.fYM3AJ / H1Yd IYCB•vAfnA/M'.V •JT'M 104I W1S1 � � lb'l5q s ' w ' , 1 1 77 : i r T r. 1 _ r71> r t r 1 4 ' o -- ;a - 1 E r� s § I I 1 I I i '.. _ .'_... ... _:._. _ $ SSW SO.@M'!$ p3yM13XM3IlOkI'YVM-fRKYyssy//ry¢�prySTs+yw//yp(pTpyg5p:5 :LnM3H/ l NIId .W-GBKIW�NNYA •3A'X lDlf/ 1.. o 2 iY u_ . __... ..... X O X w - - - - - - - ....... x / a Q ' O r III , I — — i QQ Y I I L : , __�-- 1 , � I , m: SR@ T a 03LAF/ip31� P ii3 l R uNd .�CB.cAVa+WNA '3,MF 1RIdI Ctl13lI' . 1.13'l5q NA-026620-03C (V.2.02 for MS WORD) 09/01/04 Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND LINEAR UTILITY PROJECTS LOCAL AND STATE: Application for Local Government Unit approval Pursuant to Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Act (WCA) Project Specific Report and Notification for Work on Existing Public Roads Pursuant to Minnesota WCA Application for Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Permit to Work in Public Waters Application for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Clean Water Act (CWA) Sectioq 4TJScV�Jh oJO A,IC FEDERAL: ti00Z 3 G 330 if the Armv Permit (33 CFR 325) (see Paire 5) Use this form to notify and apply for authorization of any proposed water/wetland project affecting lakes, rivers, streams or wetlands that may fall within the jurisdiction of 1) the appropriate Local Government Unit (LGU), 2) the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), or 3) the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). If a 401 certification is required from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the COE will forward this application to the MPCA for processing. You do not need to send this application to the MPCA. This application packet includes the following: PART I: STANDARD APPLICATION. Fill out (Pages 1-4) and submit along with the required attachments. Instructions for completing Part I are attached. APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT. Generally, in addition to state and local authorization, projects in wetland or water areas also require Federal authorization from the Corps of Engineers (COE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. To apply to the COE using this application packet, complete the modified one page Federal application form found on Page 5, and mail it to the COE along with a copy of the local/state application. NOTE CONCERNING COE JURISDICTION: You do not need to notify or obtain further authorization from COE if all proposed work is covered by either a COE Section 404 non -reporting General Permit or a Clean Water Act Section 404 exemption, or if no work is in an area subject to COE jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Contact the COE if you have questions. A separate form (PART H: PUBLIC ROAD MAINTENANCE SHORT FORM NOTICE) is available for use for existing public road maintenance projects only if they qualify as either: (1) Minor or emergency work impacting less than 10,000 square feet of wetlands subject to the WCA; OR (2) Minor or emergency work impacting less than 10,000 square feet of certain DNR Public Water Wetlands (i.e., those not assigned a shoreland classification, not classified as lacustrine wetlands or deepwater habitats, or not having state or federal land ownership); OR (3) Work impacting DNR Public Water Wetlands and wetland areas of DNR Public Water basins when the DNR has received a copy of the Public Road Maintenance Short Form Notice and has waived the requirement for a DNR Public Water Work Permit to either the LGU responsible for WCA or the public road authority responsible for reporting wetland impacts to the Board of Water and Soil Resources; OR (4) Work involving existing public road crossings of DNR Public Waters. If your project qualifies for this category, use this separate Public Road Maintenance Short Form Notice. See the instructions accompanying this Form Notice. INSTRUCTIONS (Introduction and Instructions) assist with completion and mailing of these applications. PIEU D DEC 2 f., 2004 Public Transportation and Utility Projects Introduction, Page 1 CITY Cr CHANHASSEN Before beginning work on your project, you must receive all required approvals from the appropriate LGU, the DNR and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). If you have not received a reply after 45 days, or if you wish to confirm the status of your application at any time, contact the agencies directly (see Instructions, Page 3). Proceeding with work before all required authorizations are obtained may result in fines or other penalties, and may include a requirement to restore the project site to original condition. If you have questions or need assistance with filling out this application, contact your LGU, your DNR Waters Area Hydrologist, or your COE regulatory field office (see Instructions, Page 3). Note: If you believe that your project may be subject to Watershed District Regulations, local Planning and Zoning jurisdiction, or any other locally implemented or enacted controls beside those of your LGU, contact the appropriate office(s) directly in addition to your LGU, the DNR, and the COE. For more information, contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) or refer to www.bwsr.state.mn.us. A QUICK LOOK AT THE PROJECT APPLICATION PROCESS Forms can be downloaded from the BWSR or DNR web sites and filled out using Microsoft Word. Your input will be restricted to fill-in fields where users can enter text or check boxes. These areas appear gray on the screen, but not on the printed document. Send copies of your completed application forms to your LGU, area DNR office, and your COE regulatory office. LOCAL government road projects that qualify for replacement of wetland impacts via the BWSR Road Replacement Program must also send a copy to the BWSR Wetland Banking Administrator (See Instructions, Page 3). When your application is considered complete and the appropriate fees have been received (if requested by the regulating agencies) it will be distributed for review and comment and you will be notified if it is accepted as proposed, approved with changes or conditions, withdrawn, or denied. You will also be informed of any appeal rights relating to the decision. WEB SITES Refer to the following web sites for more information regarding regulations of water and wetlands: BWSR: www.bwsr.state.mn.us Corps St. Paul District: www.mvp.usace.army.mil DNR: www.dcr.state.mn.us MPCA: www.pca.state.mn.us For information on the appeals process, contact the appropriate agency (See Instructions, Page 3) Public Transportation and Utility Projects Introduction, Page 2 NA-026620-03C (V.2.01 for MS WORD) 02/18/03 Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND LINEAR UTILITY PROJECTS PART I - STANDARD APPLICATION For Internal Use Only Application No. Field Office Code Date Initial Application Received Date Initial Application Deemed Complete INV: "See HELP" for important additional information and assistance in Instructions, Pages 3 — 5 IS THIS AN ORIGINAL OR AMENDED NOTICE? (check one) This is an original notice ®, dated 12/15/04 This is an amended notice ❑, dated 1. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION: Name of applicant: Carver County Contact person (name and title): Bill Weckman, Assistant County Engineer Complete mailing address: Carver Coutn Public Works, 11360 Highway 212 West, PO Box 300, Cologne, MN 55322-0300 Business phone: 9( 52) 466-5200 Fax: (952) 466-5223 e-mail: bweckman(a)co.carver.mn.us 2. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION (See HELP 2): Also attach PROJECT LOCATION MAP. S.P. 1009-14 Intersection of T.H. 101 & C.S.A.H. 14 (See Attached Project Memo for Project Location Map) 3. LAND USE: Describe existing land use in project area. (See HELP 3) (pick one from the list) Housing, highways and associated right-of-ways, farmsteads/agricultural 4. PROJECT CATEGORY (check all that apply): ® Repair rehabilitation, reconstruction or replacement of existing roads that impact wetlands (including wetland areas of DNR Public Waters). If so, indicate size of impact (check one). ® Less than 10,000 square feet of wetlands (see HELP 4). ❑ Greater than 10,000 square feet of wetlands. ❑ New road or modification of an existing road solely to increase traffic capacity impacting any amount of wetland area River, lake or stream impact (excluding wetland areas of DNR Public Waters). ❑ Placement, maintenance or repair of linear utility projects. 5. PROPOSED T KELINE: Approximate project start date: 5/05/05 Projected end date:09/01/05 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Check all that apply. Also include a detailed overhead view of your plan that clearly depicts the work to be undertaken. See What To Include on Plans (Instructions, Page 4) ❑ Guardrail improvement ❑ Slope flattening ❑ Guardrail improvement with slope flattening ® Tom lane: improvement of existing or new construction ® Resurfacing ❑ Bridge work: repair ® Culvert work; repair, extension or replacement ❑ Bridge work: replacement ❑ Stream diversion ❑ Reconstruction (existing roads) ❑ Shoulder work: repair widening ❑ Additional lanes solely for traffic capacity ❑ Shoulder widening with ditch grading ❑ New road construction ® Other ❑ Linear utility Projects 7. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: FUNDING SOURCES (%): Federal 0% State 100% Local 0% 8. SEQUENCING CONSIDERATIONS: What alternatives to this proposed project have you considered that could have avoided or minimized impacts to wetlands or water? For new construction only - list at least two alternatives (one of which may be "no build" or "do nothing"), and explain why you chose to pursue the option described in this application over these alternatives. (If space below is not adequate, attach separate sheet labeled SEQUENCING CONSIDERATIONS.) (See Attached Project Memo pages 2 & 3) Public Transportation and Utility Projects, Page I 9A. IMPACT SUMMARY: Impacts to lakes and watercourses only - indicate total amount (in acres or square feet) of water body area(s) to be filled, drained, inundated, or excavated. For watercourses indicate length of stream or river affected (in linear � feet). (See HELP 9A & 9B) Location of Impact Section, Twp, Range County Name and Watershed No. Public Waters Indicate name And ID Number For lakes indicate area of impact in acres For watercourse impacts indicate length of impact in linearfeet AFFIRMATION For Public Waters impacts: I am applying for state and local authorization to conduct the work described in this application. I am familiar with the information contained in this application. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information in this application is true, complete and accurate. I possess the authority to undertake the work described, or I am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant IF your project will impact ONLY DNR Public Waters, proceed directly to the Applicant Signature Block on Page 4. 9B. IMPACT SUMMARY: For impacts to wetlands only: ID of Wetland Basin Impacted Watershed Name or No. County Section, Twp, Range Wetland Type Predominant Vegetation Size n Wetland Impact of Size n Wetland Basin Wetland 1 Bluff Cree Carver County 255TT3W 3 grasses, sedges 0.11 ac 10.5 ac Wetland 1 Bluff Cree Carver County 2R2 16 2 grasses, bullrushes 0.01 ac 10.5 ac TOTALS OF AREA (S)1MPACTED FOR EACH WETLAND TYPE: Type 1 Type 1L Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 J Type 5 1 Type 6 1 Type 7 1 Type 8 Type R 0.01 ac I 0.11 ac 9C. Are any of these impact sites within 1000 feet of a lake or 300 feet of a river? ®No ❑Yes. If YES, please explain. 10. TYPE and AMOUNT OF FILL MATERIAL: e.g., rock, sand, clay or concrete (indicate amount of cubic yards.) Suitable fill material will be used with the total fill material covering approximately 5440 square feet. The final amount in cubic yards is yet to he determined. 11. ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: For projects that require a COE standard individual permit, attach a list of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS that includes complete names and mailing addresses of adjacent property owners whose property also adjoins the wetland or water body where the work is being proposed. 12. PORTION OF WORK ALREADY COMPLETED: Is any portion of the work already completed? ®No []Yes If YES, attach DESCRIPTION OF WORK COMPLETED and provide permit numbers if applicable. 13. STATUS OF OTHER APPROVALS: Attach STATUS OF OTHER APPROVALS LIST, include any other permits, reviews, or approvals related to this proposed project that are either pending, or have already been approved or denied. (See HELP 13) Public Transportation and Utility Projects, Page 2 STALE EAW AND EIS REQUIREMENTS: Are state Environmental Assessment Worksheets or Environmental Impact Statements required for this project? (see HELP 13.) ® not required ❑ yes, indicate status below ARCHEOLOGICAL OR CULTURAL RESOURCES DETERMINATIONS: Are you aware of any archeological or cultural resource determinations or surveys completed concerning the project or replacement site that are already completed or in process by the State Historical Society Preservation Office (SHPO) or others? ❑No ®Yes. If YES, please explain below or attach a copy of any determinations or surveys. If NO, and if project will use federal or state -aid funds, contact SHPO for determination. 14. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Are you aware of any special considerations that apply directly or indirectly to either the impact sites(s) or the replacement sites(s)? (Examples: the presence of endangered species, special fish and wildlife resources, sensitive surface waters, calcareous fens, or waste disposal sites.) (See HELP 14) ® Not aware of any special considerations ❑ Yes, attach a list of SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS and include brief descriptions of each consideration listed. 15. ON -SITE MITIGATION CONSIDERATIONS. List any important site -specific wetland functions and describe options considered for mitigation of these functions onsite. 16. HOW WILL PROPOSED REPLACEMENT BE ACCOMPLISHED: Wetland Banking only? ❑No ®Yes (if Yes, proceed to Question 17) Project -specific replacement only? ❑No ❑Yes (if YES, check all that apply below and proceed to Question 19) Project —specific replacement and Wetland Banking? ❑No ❑Yes (If Yes, check all that apply below, and proceed to Questions 18 and 19) projects involving any project —specific replacement Part A: The replacement wetland (affirm all statements): Was not previously restored or created under a prior approval replacement plan or permit; AND Was not drained or filled under an exemption during the previous 10 years, AND Was not restored with financial assistance from public conservation programs; AND Was not restored using private funds, other than those of the landowner, unless the funds are paid back with interest to the individual or organization that funded the restoration; and the individual or organization notifies the local government unit in writing that the restored wetland may be considered for replacement. Part B: Additional assurances (check all that apply); ❑ The wetland will be replaced before or concurrent with the actual draining or filling of a wetland. ❑ An irrevocable bank letter of credit, performed bond, or other acceptable security has been provided to guarantee the successful completion of the wetland replacement. ❑ The wetland losses will be replaced via withdrawal from an account in the State Wetland Bank. Part C: For projects involving any project -specific replacement: I will record the Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants of the deed for the property of which the replacement wetland(s) will be located; and I will at the same time submit proof of such recording 17. IF REPLACEMENT CONSISTS OF WETLAND BANKING, check appropriate option(s) below. (See HELP 17) ® BWSR Road Replacement Program this option is available only for repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction or replacement of existing county, township or city roads. (Note: the TEP must certify that the project qualifies for this option — page 6.) If all of your replacement qualifies for this option - you do not need to answer the remaining questions, please skip to the Applicant Signature Blocks (pages 4 and 5). ❑ State Wetland Bank -proceed to Question 21. (You must also complete the Application for Withdrawal of Credits Form and include with your application, see HELP 6), 18. FOR PROJECTS INVOLVING REPLACEMENT BY WETLAND BANKING: I affimr that to the best of my knowledge and belief that all information in this application is true, complete and accurate. I affirm that the wetland losses will be replaced via Public Transportation and Utility Projects, Page 3 withdrawal from an account in the State Wetland Bank. I affirm that a completed withdrawal form has been submitted to the BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator for replacing losses through the State Weiland Bank. 19. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND (S) CONSTRUCTION: (Complete this section only if you are conducting project -specific replacement). See HELP 19 and attach this description on a separate sheet of paper labeled DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND CONSTRUCTION. 20. SURPLUS WETLAND CREDITS: If using project -specific replacement, will the replacement result in any surplus wetland credits that you wish to have deposited in the State Wetland Bank for future use? ❑No [-]Yes. If Yes, submit a Wetland Banking Application directly to your LGU. Copies are available from your LGU, or you may download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us 21. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLANDS: Complete the chart below for all wetland replacement sites (including bank sites) except for replacement to be completed through the BWSR Road Replacement Program. If your project has more than one wetland replacement site, reference your overhead view (See Question 6) to this chart. See HELP 21. Name of Wetland Replacement Site Major Watershed number County Section Township Range Predominant Vegetation Proposed Wetland Type New Wetland Credits C Public Value Credits (PVC) Restored or created? Indicate R or C TOTALS: Applicant Signature Block To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information in this application is true, complete and accurate. I possess the authority to undertake the work described, or I am acting as the duly appointed agent of the applicant. Public Transportation and Utility Projects, Page 4 Y For projects involving construction of new roads, increased traffic capacity or linear utility of projects, the replacement plan is (Check one): ❑ Approved ❑ Approved with conditions (conditions attached) ❑ Denied LGU official signature Date LGU has received evidence of title and proof of recording of Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland: County where recorded Date Recorded Document # assigned by Recorder LGU official signature Date Public Transportation and Utility Projects, Page 5 APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT (33 CFR 325) OMB APPROVAL NO.0710-003 Expires Dee 31, 2004 The public burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10lours per response, although the majority ofapplicatiom should require 5 hours or less. This includes the time for,reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and corrpleting and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect ofthis collection ofinfomation, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Depamnent of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget. Paperwork Reduction Pmject (0710-1g03), Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should he aware that notwithstanding any other prevision oflaw, an person shall be subject to any Penalty for failing to coroply with a collection of information Sit does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Completed applications must be subrruued to the District engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT: Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 Use 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a pertrdL Routine uses: This information may be shared with the Departnnent oflostice and other Federal, state, and local government agencies. Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is rot Provided, the pemut application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. 1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED YOU DO NOT NEED TO COMPLETE ITEMS 6-10 and 12-25 in the SHADED AREAS. AA applicants need to complete non -shaded items 5 and 26. If an agent is to be used, also complete items 8 and 11. This optional Federal form is valid for use only when included as part of this entire state application packet 5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME .AND TITLE (an agent is not required) Caner Counts 6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENTS ADDRESS 7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NO. 10. AGE�,T'�,P ,)i:NO,.. 11. STATEMENT OF At THORIZATION (if applicable, cornp(ere only ifaulhorizingan agenp 1 hereby authorize to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application. APPLICANTS SIGNATURE. D.ATF. 12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions) 13. NAME OF WATERBODY. IF KNOWN (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable) 15. LOCATION OF PROJECT 16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions) 17. DIRECTIONS TO T14E SITE IS. NATURE OF ACTIVITY 19. PROJECT PURPOSE 20_ REASON (S) FOR DISCHARGE 21, TYPES OF MATERIAL BEING DISCHARGED AND TI IF AMOUNT OF EACH TYPE IN CUBIC YARDS 22. SURFACE AREA IN ACRES OF WETLANDS OR OTHER WATERS FILLED 23. IS ANY PORTION OF THE WORK ALREADY COMPLETE? YES NO IF YES, DESCRIBE COMPLETED WORK. 24. ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS. 25, LIST OF OTHER CERTIFICATIONS OR APPROVALS/DENIALS RECEIVED FROM OTHER FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL AGENCIES FOR WORK DESCRIBED IN THIS APPLICATION. 26.Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. Signature of applican Dale Signature of agent (if any) Dale The application most be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant), or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement in Block 11 has been filled out and signed. 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the Uni led States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up with any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than S10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both. ENG FORM 4345, Jul 97 EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR) Public Transportation and Utility Projects, Page 6 FOR TEP USE ONLY This st:ction must be completed for projects affecting more than 10,000 sq. ft. of wetland involving repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement of a currently serviceable existing state, city, county, or township public road necessary to meet state or federal design or safety standards or requirements, and for which the impacts are proposed to be replaced by BWSR through the Public Road Replacement Program. No debit of wetland banking credits shall occur until a majority of the TEP members recommend approval by signing below. As indicated below, TEP members recommend the BWSR debit the State Wetland bank to provide replacement for wetland impacts identified on this form, and certify the following: • The public road authority has provided project -specific reports to TEP members at least 30 days prior to beginning construction, or within 30 days after an emergency repair resulting in less than 10,000 ft' of impact; and • The TEP has reviewed minimization and delineation decisions made by the public road authority and determined the decisions to be satisfactory. ❑ Agree ❑ Agree ❑ Disagree ❑ Disagree SWCD Representative (Date) BWSR Representative (Daze) ❑ Agree ❑ Agree ❑ Disagree ❑ Disagree LGU Representative (Date) DNR Representative (if applicable) (Date) Public Transportation and Utility Projects, Page 7 Instructions for Part I HELP 2: Indicate road name and/or number, termini and project numbers. HELP 3: List all that apply: housing, commercial industrial, parks/recreation areas, highways and associated right-of-way, forests, farmsteads/agricultural, vacant lands, public and semi-public (schools, government facilities), airports, extractive (gravel, pits, quarries), other. HELP 4: Please note that a PART H: PUBLIC ROAD MAINTENANCE SHORT FORM has been developed for use with maintenance projects that qualify as either minor or emergency work impacting: minor or emergency work impacting less than 10,000 square feet of wetlands subject to the WCA, OR ❑ minor or emergency work impacting less than 10,000 square feet of certain DNR Public Water Wetlands (i.e., those not assigned a shoreland classification, not classified as lacustrine wetlands or deepwater habitats, or not having state or federal land ownership), provided a copy of this form is sent to the DNR Waters area office prior to initiation of the project, OR ❑ DNR Public Water Wetlands and wetland areas of DNR Public Waterbasins when the DNR has received a copy of the Public Road Maintenance Short Form Notice and has waived the requirement for a DNR Public Water Work Permit to either the LGU responsible for WCA or the public road authority responsible for reporting wetland impacts to the Board of Water and Soil Resources, OR ❑ Existing public road crossings of DNR Public Waters. Contact the DNR Waters Area Hydrologist if assistance is needed on shoreland, lacustrine or deep -water determinations. HELP 9A & 9B: See www.dnr.state.mn.us/watersheds/map.html for a state map with watershed names and numbers. HELP 13: Other permits, reviews or approvals related to the project may include the following: conditional use permit; National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit; state disposal system permit (includes dredged material disposal: watershed district/watershed management organization permit (storm water, erosion, floodplain); groundwater appropriation permit; or county/township driveway/road permit. If you do not know whether your project requires state Environmental Assessment Worksheets or Environmental Impact Statements, contact the Environmental Quality Board, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN 55155. Phone 651-297-1257. e-mail: egb@mnplan.state.ma.us. Web site: www.molan.state.nm.us/egb/review.html. Contact the State Historic Preservation Office for a determination. Phone: 651-296-5434. entail: mmshpo@mnhs.org. HELP 14: If you wish to obtain information on state -listed threatened and endangered species and other natural resource elementscontact the DNR Natural Heritage Program at 651-296-7963. HELP 17: Copies of the Application for Withdrawal of Credits forms are available from your LGU, or you may download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us HELP 19: Describe, in detail, how mitigation wetland(s) will be constructed. If several methods will be used describe each method. Details should include: 1) type of construction (such as excavated in upland, restored the file break, restored by ditch block or revegetated); 2) type size and specifications of outlet structures; 3) elevations relative to Mean Sea Level or established benchmarks of key features (such as sill, emergency overflow or structure height); 4) what best management practices will be implemented to prevent erosion or site degradation; 5) proposed project start and end dates; and 6) a vegetation management plan. Attach this description on a separate sheet of paper labeled DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND CONSTRUCTION. For projects involving at least some project -specific replacement, include the following additional information: ❑ Two drawings to scale of the replacement wetland. Include both overhead view and profile view (side view or cross -sectional view). Without drawings, your application will be considered incomplete. ❑ For created replacement wetlands, include additional soils information (if available) that indicates the capability or the site to produce and maintain wetland characteristics. ❑ Note 1: For replacement wetlands located on pipeline easements, you need to receive endorsement of your project from both the easement holder and the Minnesota Department of Public Safety's Office of Pipeline Safety. Before state of construction, the owner of any utilities involved must be notified. The landowners or contractor is responsible for giving this notice by calling Gopher State One -Call at 651454-0002 (Twin Cities Metro Area) or 1-800-252-1166 (all other locations). ❑ Note 2: For extensive or complex projects, supplementary information may be requested at a later date from one or more of the responding agencies. Such information may include (but not be limited to) the following topographic map, water table map, soil borings, depth soundings, aerial photographs, and environmental assessment and/ or engineering reports. HELP 21: If you do not have access to some of the information requested, or if you do not know your replacement ratio, call your LGU or SWCD office for assistance. Public Transportation and Linear Utility Projects Instructions, Page 1 What to include on Plans (Part I) Detailed overhead views of impact site(s) and replacement site(s), as well as profile view(s) of replacement site(s) may be hand drawn, computer generated or professionally prepared, as long as they contain all necessary information clearly, accurately, and in adequate detail. Please include specific dimensions whenever possible. You may also include photos, if you wish. Overhead views of impact site(s) and replacement site(s) should include the following items that pertain to your project: 1. Location and extent of shoreline, wetlands and water. 2. Section, township and range of site(s). 3. Location and dimensions of proposed project, structure or activity. Include length, width, elevation and other measurements, including old and new alignments, as appropriate. 4. For bridge and culvert projects, include hydrology and hydraulic reports as applicable. 5. Points of reference (such as existing bridges, culverts, landscape features). 6. Location of inlet and outlet structures. 7. Indication of north. 8. Location of spoil and disposal sites (if applicable). 9. Location of photo reference points for future monitoring of replacement site(s). Profile views (side or cross sectional views) of replacement site(s) should include the following items that pertain to your project: 1. Location and dimensions of proposed project, structure or activity. Include elevation, depth, soil profile, side slope, and other measurements as appropriate. 2. Proposed water level elevation. 3. Areas of wetland and upland plants established on replacement site(s). Other information I. Property boundaries. 2. Location and extent of shoreline and water. 3. Location and dimensions of proposed project, structure or activity include length, width, elevation and other measurements as appropriate. 4. Points of reference (such as existing bridges, culverts or landscape features). 5. Location of inlet and outlet structures. 6. Indication of north. 7. Location of spoil and disposal sites (if applicable). Final Checklist Attachments must include: Project Locator Map Description of Work Completed (Question 12; if answered "Yes") Overhead View of Project Adjoining Property Owners (for projects that require a COE individual permit) Status of Other Approvals List Signed application for the Department of the Army Permit (Page 5) to seek Federal authorization of your project? Attachments may also include: Sequencing Considerations (Question 8; if additional space is needed) Listing of Special Consideration (Question 14; if answered "yes") SHPO archaeological or cultural resource determinations or surveys (Question 13; if required and if completed) If project includes any wetland banking, attachments must include: Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits (Section 17) If project includes any project specific replacement, attachments must include: 1) Description of Replacement Wetland Construction (Section 19); 2) Vegetation Management Plan (HELP 19); and 3) Two drawings to scale (HELP 19) Public Transportation and Linear Utility Projects Instructions, Page 2 Preparing Your Application for Mailing. To apply for both state and Federal authorization, your application must include Part I (Pages 14), the Federal application (Page 5) and attachments as indicated on final Checklist for Part I (Instructions, Page 4). Make'three copies of the entire application and all attachments. Keep the original, and mail the three copies to the appropriate local, state, and Federal agencies (see below). Mailing your application. Mail a complete copy of your application to each of the local state, and Federal entities listed below. Include Part I, and all attachments. If you are using the Public Road Maintenance Short Form Notice include required attachments. LOCAL: Send to the appropriate Local Government Unit (LGU). Contact your county Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office or the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) web site (www.bwsr.state.mn.us) for this information. SWCD offices are also listed on the BWSR web site. For local road projects that qualify for wetland replacement under the BWSR Public Road Replacement Program, also send a complete copy of the application, including TEP member signatures on page 6, and attachments to the BWSR Wetland Banking Administrator at 1 West Water Street, Suite200, St. Paul, MN 55107, phone 651-2974958. STATE: Send to your area DNR Waters office, attention Area Hydrologist. Contact your county Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office or the DNR web site (www.dm.state.mn.us) for this information. Area offices can also be determined by contacting the applicable Regional DNR office: NW Region: 2115 Birchmont Beach Road N.E. NE Region: 1201 East Highway 2 Bemidji, MN 56601 Grand Rapids, MN 55744 Phone: 218-755-3973 Phone: 218-3274416 Central Region: 1200 Warner Road Southern Region: 261 Highway 15 South St. Paul, MN 55106 New Ulm, MN 56073 Phone: 651-772-7910 Phone: 507 359-6053 FEDERAL: Send to the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulatory field office: Brainerd: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch,10867 E. Gull Lake Drive N.W., Brainerd, MN 56401-9051, Phone: 218-829-8402 St. Paul: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch, Army Corps of Engineers Centre,190 5th Street East, St. Paul, MN 55101-9051, Phone: 651-290-5375 La Crescent: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch,1114 South Oak Street, La Crescent, MN 55947-1338, Phone:507-895-8059 Two Harbors: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch,1554 Highway 2, Suite 2, Two Harbors, MN 55161, Phone:218-834-6630 Public Transportation and Linear Utility Projects Instructions, Page 3 Adioinint? Propertv Owners P.I.D. Landowner Mailing Address 254120010 Magdy A. & June L. Ebrahim 521 Pineview Ct. Chanhassen, MN 55317 254120020 Donald E. Halla & Sandra J. Cwayna Halla 10000 Great Plains Blvd Chaska, MN 55318 254120030 John & Anna Mae Makela 9860 Raspberry Hill Chaska, MN 55318 250253300 Roger A. & Kimberly A. Lee 600 96" Street W Chanhassen, MN 55317 250253100 Robert & Christin E. Boecker 610 96 s Street W Chanhassen, MN 55317 250253500 Andrew T. Riegert 620 96" Street W Chanhassen, MN 55317 250253800 Theodore B. & Karen K Hasse 630 96i° Street W Chanhassen, MN 55317 253050050 Lisa Cuff 9855 Delphinium Lane Chaska, MN 55318 253050030 Roger G. Novotny 560 Pineview Ct Chanhassen, MN 55317 253050020 Richard S. & Katherine S. Asplin 541 Pineview Ct Chanhassen, MN 55317 253050190 Donald E. Halla & Sandra J. Cwayna Halla 10000 Great Plains Blvd Chaska, MN 55318 PROJECT MEMORANDUM FOR SP 1009-14 TH 101 AND C.S.A.H. # 14 (PIONEER TRAIL) INTERSECTION MODIFICATION: PLACE SIGNAL, SAFETY AND CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT, CREATE RIGHT AND LEFT, THROUGH LANES IN ALL DIRECTIONS. REHABILITATE THE DRAINAGE. Metro District - Mn/DOT 1500 West County Road B2, Roseville, MN 55113 - 3 T 0 o ° A O 0 J O S F O i N w £ L AmH elels ci j � -•; ti �1 = cj Ir Z AmH elel i i F ;sfY �'Yf PROJECT MEMORANDUM Review: Draft Final X Trunk Highway 101 at Pioneer Trail, (C.S.A.11.14) State Project Number: 1009-14 Federal Project Number. no federal funds Project Team is T.H.101 from 650' north of C.S.A.H.14 (Pioneer Trail) to 650' south of C.S.A.H.14, and CSAH 14 from 650' east of TH 101 to 650' west of T.H.101. City(ies): City of Chanhassen County(ies): Carver County Section, Township, Range: Sec. 25, T 116 N, R 23 W Program: Safety and Capacity Program. Brief Project Description: Construct a signalized intersection with left and right turn lanes for each of the four legs. Letting Date: February 25, 2005 n Project Manager: Geoff Prelgo` Phone:651-634-2355 ts Ansex�.E., Metro District Resource Engineer APPROVED BY: _NIA Richard A_ Elasky, P.E., Chief Environmental Engineer DESIGN EXCEPTIONS APPROVED BY: _NIA Mukthar Thakuy P.E., State Design Engineer 1 22 ate Date Date This document is available in alternative formats to individuals with disabilities by calling the Project Manager at the phone number listed above or through the Minnesota Relay Service at I-800-627-3529. Table of Contents PROJECTMEMORANDUM...................................................... _.............................................. i AreaMap........................................................................................................................ v ProjectMap..................................................................... ............................................................. iv Tableof Contents......................................................................................................................... iv I. REPORT PURPOSE ..................................... _.............................................. ..................... 1 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................. .... _..................................................... 1 EXISTINGCONDITION............................................................................................................ 1 PROPOSEDPROIECI............................................................................................................... 1 M. COST AND FUNDING SOURCE .................................................................................... I IV. SCHEDULE AND PROJECT MANAGER ..................................................................... 1 V. NEED FOR PROJECT .... .»............................................................................................... 2 CAPACITY.............................................................................................................................. 2 SAFETY.................................................................................................................................. 2 VI. ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................ __..... 2 NO -Bunco ALTERNATIVE...................................................................................................... 2 PREFERREDALTERNATIVE.................................................................................................... 3 VII. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEE) IMPACTS ....................... 3 ACCESS CONTROL: 5 BIKEWAYS AND PEDESTRIANS............................................................................................... 5 CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS...................................................................................................... 5 CONTAMINATED PROPERTIES ................................................................................................ 5 EROSIONCONTROL ............................................................................................................... EXCESSMATERIALS 5 ................................................................... ............. .............................. 5 FARMLANDIMPACTS............................................................................................................. 6 FISHAND WILDLIFE.............................................................................................................. 6 HANDICAPPED....................................................................................................................... 6 HISTORICAL........................................................................................................................... 6 RIGHTOF WAY...................................................................................................................... 6 SOCIAL: 6 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES, FEDERAL............................................................ 6 TBREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES, SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN, STATE .............: 6 TRAFFICFORECASTS....................:........................................................................................ 7 UTILITIES ................................. VEGETATION.............................................................................:........................................... 7 (iv) File: MNDOT DOCSX356344-v14-PROJECT i,IEMEORANDUM_FOR_1009-14_(TH_1010_AT_CSAH_14) WATERQUALrrr.................................................................................................................. 7 WETLANDS._...................-,,............................. VIII. MITIGATION....................................................................................................................8 IX. PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT (PERMITS/APPROVALS).................... 3 X. GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS AND EXCEPTIONS ...................................... 3 M. LEVEL OF ACTION ................................. »...................................................................... S XII. FINAL REPORT DISTRIBUTION CHECKLIST......................................................... 9 APPENDIX.................................................................................................................................. 10 (v) File:.MNDOT_DOCS-#356344-v14PROJEC1'_MEMEORANDUM—FOR_1009-14_(TH_1U10_.1T_CSAH_14) PROJECT MEMORANDUM - S.P.1009-14 I. REPORT PURPOSE 101/CSAH 141 , The Project Memorandum for this Class H (Categorical Exclusion) action documents the project's need, project description, social, economic and environmental impacts, and design standards and exceptions. Funding information, anticipated schedule and project manager are also included 11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Existing Condition The proposed project is located in the city of Chanhassen in Carver County, Minnesota, west of Eden Prairie. Presently the junction of T.H. 101 and Pioneer Trail (C.S.A_H. 14) is an at -grade intersection controlled by stop signs and no turn lanes. T.H. 101 is a two-lane rural highway, with 12 ft wide bituminous paved lanes and 8 ft wide bituminous paved shoulders in the project area. T.H. 101 goes from Elk River, Mn, to Shakopee, Mn. and road widths, grades and sigbt lines vary greatly. 40 M.P.H. is the posted speed on T.H. 101 near Pioneer Trail. T.H. 101 has an average daily traffic of 2900 (2000 ADT counts). Pioneer Trail (C.S. A.H. 14) is a two-lane rural highway with side access and its average daily traffic is 4,130 (2000 ADT counts). Conditions cause backups during the morning and evening peak hours. C.S.A.H. 14 goes from West Hennepin Co. Line to the junction with County Road 11 in Laketown Township west of Chaska. Posted speed limit on C.S.A.H. 14 is 45 MPH. Proposed Project The proposed project is illustrated on the project map. Project features include: • Each approach leg will have a 13' wide left tam lane, a 12' wide right turn lane, and a 12' through lane; all channelization will be with painted stripes, not raised medians. • A new signal will be installed at the intersection and will have pedestrian crossing indicators. • Eight -foot wide bituminous shoulders will be constructed on T.H. 101 and an additional one and one half foot width will be gravel within the project limits and on the west leg of C.S.A.H. 14. On the east leg of C.S.A.H. 14, the shoulders will match the inplace shoulders. • In the northeast comer of the intersection, a paved sidewalk/trail will be constructed to connect to an existing pedestrian/bicycle trail. Pedestrian and bicycle paths are planned for other comers of this intersection, but will not be constructed under this project • Drainage will be carried in ditches along the roadway. A culvert paralleling the west side of T.H. 101, south of C.S.A.H. 1 - is being investigated to limit the area of construction disturbance. III. COST AND FUNDING SOURCE The total cost of this project is estimated at $1,500,000; $920,000 for construction and $600,000 for right of way. The precise cost of right of way is not yet available. See the Project Management Scheduling System (Artemis) Funding Report in the appendix for additional information. Project cost and funding will use state -aid funds, so state -aid standards need to be addressed The Project Management Scheduling System will contain the latest available funding information_ IV. SCHEDULE AND PROJECT MANAGER Project Letting Date: February 25, 2005 Construction begins: April 1, 2005 Highway opens to Traffic: August 1, 2005 Page 1 Tdc M[mOT DOGS YAHlitvll-¢BWER MLX¢O•ADDOM_!Dp 1 W}li_(IH I.IB AT CS18 1� PROJECT MEMORANDUM - S.P.1009-14 (T.H.101/ CSAH 14) The project schedule (Activity Report) from MzvDOTS Project Management Scheduling System (Artemis) is in the appendix. The project schedule may change. The Project Management Scheduling System -will eontain-the late*estimatedletbngdate-and-pre-lettmg-activity-status-information— The Project Manager is: The Report Preparer is: Geoffrey Prelgo Gregg Iverson 1500 West County Road B2 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 Roseville, MN 55113 Phone: (651) 634-2355 Phone: (651) 582-1322 V. NEED FOR PROJECT Capacity This project will reduce delay for the increasing traffic levels on TH 1011 C.S.A.H. 14. Left -turn lanes at TH 101and C.S.A.H. 14 should improve capacity and long backups that are current problems. Current peak hour volumes and turns are shown on the Project Map. The table below shows the travel delay and level of service (LOS) for the existing condition (All -way stop). The LOS for the existing condition exceeds capacity during the morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) peak hours. Level of Service (LOS) and Travel Delav 2002 Peak Hour All -way stop sting condition Signalized referred alternative Dela secJveh.) LOS DelaysecJveh LOS (41 AM 291.60 F 9.8 A PM 14438 F 8.7 A ratae notes: (1) All -way stop control travel delay and LOS calculated using 2000 EHgtnmy Capacity Manual method for ua sigaalired iuterseco m. (2) Signalized travel delay and LOS calculated using Synchro 5 (3) LOSs at all -way stops is defined as follows; LOS A = 0-10 sm. delay/vehicle; WS B=>10-15 sea delay/vehicle; LOS C=>15.25 sec. delay/vehicle; LOS D=>25-35 sec. delay/vehicle•, LOS E = > 35-50 sec. delay/vehiclr LOS F => 50 sec. delay/vehicle. (4) LOSs at signalized intersections is defined as follows: LOS A=0-10 sec. delay/vehicle, LOS B=>10-20 sec. delay/vehlcle; LOS C=>20-35 sot. delay/vehicle; LOS D=>35-55 sec. delay/vehicle, LOS E=>55-80 sec. delay/vehicle; LOS F=>80 sec. delay/vehicle. See Appendix for -"Highway Capacity Manual all -way stop capacity analysis" and "Synchro 5 Signalized capacity analysis." Safety According to MnDOT's llgh Crash Cost Data/Information web page, this intersection rank.; 2261 out of nearly 4000 intersections in the database. Vi. ALTERNATIVES / No -Build Alternative Under the "No -Build alternative, no geometric changes would be made to the intersection- Normal pavement and signage maintenance would be performed. The "No -Build" alternative would not solve back up and capacity problems at the TH 101 and Pioneer Trail intersection - Page 2 � N'mp'e OO6iLiX)ftrlPean]aR �aAiIDOM ro{ Ielf-U119 IN AT GSAP IQ PROJECT MEMORANDUM - S.P.1009-14 (TM.101/ CSAII 14) i) Preferred Alternative The preferred alternative is descnbed in the Proposed Project section above. VD. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEE) IMPACTS This project has been reviewed for its potential effects on the environment and community. Information is presented for those items checked "yes" and meriting individual discussion. If items are checked in the "no effect" box, they have been considered, relative to appropriate laws, executive orders. rules, and regulations. Social, Economic, and Environmental Impacts Issue Questions Degree of Impact Will the project... Yes � No �, impact "Descriptiono>- - Page Reference Access Control Change access to properties (close, change X See `:Votes location, make one-way, etc.)? clarifying SEE concerns." Air Quality Affect air quality? X Bikeways &Pedestrians - Affect bicycle and/or pedestrian movements? X See "Notes clarifying SEE concerns." Coastal Zone Impacts Affect highways alp Lake 'or? X Construction Impacts Cause construction impacts (erosion, noise, air, vibration, etc.)? X See "Notes clarifying SAE concerns." Involve excavation (including utilities) in X See "Notes Contaminated any known or potentially contaminated clarifying SEE Properties or Materials property, or handling of any contaminated materials? concerns." Controversy Be controversial or be likely to cause X controversy? Critical Areas Be in the Mississi i River critical area? X Economic Impacts Affect business activity or have other X economic acts? Ener Im acts Have ma or ener lications? X Have disproportionately high and adverse X Environmental Justice human health or environmental effects on minority populations and low-income populations? Involve major soil disturbance (depth or X See "Notes Erosion Control volume) or have erosion potential due to clarifying SEE land form, wind Datterns, or water volume? concerns" Excess Materials Involve disposal of excess materials outside X See "Notes planned construction limits? clarifying SEE concerns" X See "Notes Farmland Impacts Require any right of way? chrifymg SEE concerns." X See "Notes Fish and Wildlife Affect fish or wildlife? clarifying SEE concerns." Flood ins Cross or he adjacent to any floodplain area? I - X Page 3 F4. T O005.yy5gHM1-MR UT MCMEOYANDIIM MR JO U (IB 1610 AT_C 14) PROJECT MEMORANDUM - S.P.1009-14 (T.H.101/ CSAH 14) SociaL Economic. and Environmental Im acts Issue Questions____—-IleareeofIm act Impact Will the project... - ties No Description or. Paze Reference Groundwater Geolo"v. Affect groundwater, geology, or cause earthbom vibrations? Y Earthborn Vibration Handicapped Affect sidewalk or crab and gutter (design X See "Notes for)? Clarifying SEE Concerns" Historical Affect any historical, archaeological or X See `Notes Archaeological Collural cultural site? clarifying SEE concerns" Land Use Impacts Be inconsistent with local and regional land X useplans? Noise Affect noise sensitive receptors? X Parks, Recreation Use any significant public park, recreation, X Section 4(t) or 6(f) or wildlife or waterfowl refugees, or any ILAWCONI land historical site? Will the project affect any LAWCON land? X See `Notes Right of Way Require any right of way (or easements)? clarifying SEE concerns." Relocation Require any relocation of homes or X businesses? Stream or Water Bodv Change the course, current, or cross section of any stream? X Modification Affect public safety (i.e. police or fire X See `Notes protection)? clarifying SEE concerns." Social hnpact sensitive groups (children, X handicapped, minorities r, etc.)? Affect accessibility to schools, churches, X recreation facilities, etc.? Affect community cohesion? X Threatened and Endangered Species Affect an Federal y en dangered species due X See "Notes Federal to project location and design? clarifying SEE concerns." Threatened and X -See `-Notes Endangered Species. Affect any State endangered species due to clarifying SEE Species of Special project location and design? concerns." Concern State Traffic Forecasts Correct capacity deficiencies? Is there a X See "Notes clarifying SEE detour or major traffic delay? concerns." Transit Affect transit routes? }( Tribal Lands Affect Tribal Lands? X X See "Notes Utilities Affect utilities? clarifying SEE concerns." X See `Notes Vegetation Affect vegetation? clarifying SEE concerns." Page 4 Fa.: N.mar_oa:SsJusw.u-en"IeR ae�aonwxoUn� xoe �9ew�+_(IH_�mo A _CSA9_u) PROJECT MEMORANDUM - S.P. 1009-14 (TIL 101/ CSAH 14) Social. Economic and Environmental Impacts - Issue ; Questions --- - --- - Degree of Impact - - _ Impact Nill the project... - Yes So Description or - Page Reference Visual Ouality Affect visual qualities (view to or from X facility)? Water Quality Affect water quality of lakes, streams, XSee' Notes wetlands, etc..? clari clarifying SEE concerns." Have wetlands present within the X See "Notes Wetlands construction limits? clarifying SEE concerns." Affect wetland habitat? X Wild & Scenic Rivers: Affect -a state or federal wild & scenic river, X Canoe & Boating Rivers: -federal candidate wild & scenic river, MNRRA -state canoe and boating river, or -MNRRA? Notes clarifying SEE concerns: Access Control: This project will close a field entrance on the south side of C.S.A.H. 14 approximately 250' east of the intersection. The property owner will access this property from a second entrance 800' east from the intersection Both locations are shown on the Project Map. Bikeways and Pedestrians This project has separate brlceway/pedestrian facilities along a trail at the north edge of C.S.A.H.14 and east edge of TH 101. Connection to the existing trails on the northeast comer of the intersection is provided by this project. Future county and city plans (not part of this project) call for trails to extend west and south from this intersection, west on C.S.A.H. 14 and south on TH 101. The new signal will have pedestrian crossing indicator lights. Construction Impacts Construction will result in construction -related au quality, noise and dust impacts, and possible erosion impacts during the construction period Disposal of excess material will comply with the project's standard specifications, and will not occur in wetlands, floodplains, or other sensitive areas. A traffic control plan will be developed during the design phase. Contaminated Properties A review of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Geographic Information System files was completed for the project area The evaluation indicated that no properties with known contamination are located near the project area that could be impacted by the project See Letter in Appendix dated March 4, 2003. Erosion Control This project may result in some erosion since about 1 to 2 acres of existing ground cover will be removed during construction MnDOT will apply for an NPDES permit. Temporary and permanent erosion control plans, as well as best management practices (BMP's) contained in Mn/DOT's standard specifications, details and special provisions will be followed Less than one acre of new impervious surface will be constructed Excess Materials Page 5 FJe: HNpOT 006.:]Sb.Y�I}p((yg('I'-H�[gppp,IppM FOR IOOf-1C_(IR_1N� AT 61R_1n PROJECT MEMORANDUM - S.P.1009-14 (T.H.101/ CSAH 14) Excess materials and debris from this project such as roadway bituminous will be disposed of in accordance with Mn/DOT Standard Specification for Construction, 2104.3C and Minnesota Rule panc� az, excess ma an ens will not placed m wetlands or floodplains. Farmland Impacts This project will require acquisition of right of way. The right of way to be acquired lies in an area committed for urban development, which has not been protected as farmland by the State or any local unit of government The provisions of the Farmland Protection Policy Act do not apply to this project Fish and Wildlife The DNR responded to a request for a DNR Questionnaire (see appendix). The DNR noted that, while there are ]mown occurrences of rare species or natural communities within a one -mile radius of the project, standard construction practices (e.g., runoff prevention) should ensure that these remain unaffected by the project activity. Handicapped There are curbs constructed along the southwest comer of the intersection, along the new culvert on the west side of T.H. 101. There are no sidewalks in the southwest quadrant so handicapped invividuals wil not be affected. Sidewalk connections will be constructed in the northeast quadrant The sidewalks will have flat grades that will not impede physically handicapped individuals The new signal will have pedestrian crossing lights. Historical See the Appendix for the SHPO consultation letters dated April 16,2003 and May 23, 2003. Right of Way Permanent right of way is needed from eight parcels. These are large single-family residential parcels. The right of way will be strip -takings up to 50-feet in width, along TH 101 and CSAH 14. This right of way is needed for the roadway widening, sight -comers and storm sewer. One field entrance will be closed (see access control above).Temporary construction easements will be needed. Right of way acquisition will be conducted in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended. Social: Emergency Vehicle Preempters (EVP) will be installed on the new signals. EVP's allow especially equipped emergency vehicles to change the signal lights to green. Threatened and Endangered Species, Federal According to information provided by the Natural Heritage Database maintained by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, there are no known occurrences of federal threatened or endangered species within the project area (see Threatened and Endangered Species memo from MnDOT Natural Resource Coordinator in appendix). This is a state -funded project, however it may require a U.S. Corps of Engineers permit, due to filling of wetlands. Federal agencies that authorize, fund, or carry out a proposed project are required to evaluate whether a proposed action "may affect" a listed species. If a U.S. Corps of Engineers permit is required for this project, that agency will make the determination as part of the permit process. MnDOT anticipates the US COE will conclude that the project will have no effect on federal threatened or endangered species. Threatened and Endangered Species, Species of Special Concern, State The DNR provided comments on this project (See Appendix for letter dated: May 16, 2003). ). The DNR noted that, while there are known occurrences of raze species or natural communities within a Page 6 Filc TLYDOT DpCS/156Hn13)ROJER M6i1COR.>.YOVn! NR 1M wgK_18J AT G R It) PROJECT MEMORANDUM - S.P.1009-14 (T.H.101/ CSAH 14) one -mile radius of the project, standard construction practices (e.g., runoff prevention) should ensure that these remain unaffected by the project activity. Traffic Forecasts There will not be a detour as part of this project. Two lanes of traffic (one in each direction) will be carried through the project area during construction. Lane shifts (and any temporary lanes closures) will be signed following the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MIDI MUTCD) guidelines. Access to properties along the project will remain open during construction Utilities No public utilities will be moved because of this reconstruction project. Private utilities that will need to be relocated, include a gas line, electric cable and power poles, fiber optic cable, buried phone cable as well as a signal cable and hand hole. Vegetation This project will impact a number of trees along T.H. 101 and CSAH 14. Mn/DOT's Forestry Unit reviewed the vegetation in the project area. See the Appendix for Vegetation Review Memo dated 10/30/2003. There are 18 trees on the west side of T.H. 101 north of CSAH 14. Ten of these trees are worthy of transplanting to different sites. West of T.H. 101, along the south side of CSAH 14, is a band of trees consisting of Red Oak, Sugar Maple, Basswood, and Aspen. This area falls under a conservation easement. A conservation easement covers a band approximately 60 feet wide, parallel to the south CSAH 14 right of way line. The area covered by the conservation easement is shown on the map attached to the Vegetation Review Memo. More information about the conservation easement is in the letter from the City of Chanhassen to Mr. Don Halla dated 10/4/94, which can be found in the appendix. Trees that may be removed because of this project are identified on the map attached to the Vegetation Review Memo. The 18 trees west of T.H. 101 and north of CSAH 14, as well as about 9,000 sq. ft. of tree canopy along the west side of T H. 101 south of CSAH 14, will likely be removed. To minimize impacts, tree protection fencing will be installed along construction limits to avoid any unnecessary damage to the trees outside of the construction limits. As part of the Final Design process, either a consulting forester or a member of the Forestry Unit should do a Comprehensive Vegetation Protection and Salvage Review (Forestry Plan). The plan should include the following components: Tree and other woody plant/plant community protection opportunities Tree and other woody plant transplant opportunities Timber utilization opportunities Hazard tree identification Mn/DOT Standard Specifications for Construction section 2572 will direct the contractor as to appropriate treatment for vegetation protection. See the Vegetation Review Memo for suggested pay items. Water Quality This project will increase the existing impervious surface area by 0.82 acre. Associated highway run- off will be increased. Drainage from the project area will be via grassy ditches. Since the total new, impervious area is less than 1 acre, no new ponding areas are planned as part of this project Wetlands Page 7 l�:e: MNDOI'_DOCSC]Sa114v1�-TROJ¢R M¢N¢oPAttUUb FVH IOB9-l1_(IH_lYl1 Ai GGtl_WI PROJECT MEMORANDUM - S.P.1009-14 (T.H.101/ CSAH 14) ' - - Wetlands Metro District's wetland delineator reviewed this project for wetland locations. A PEMC flow through wetland, of approximately 10.5 acres, exists in the northwest quadrant of this intersection. This project will fill approximately 0.13 acres due to the addition of left and right turn lanes on CSAH 14. An alternative that could have avoided wetland impacts would realign C.S.A.H. 14 to the south, which would have required additional impacts to the trees on the south side of C.S-kH. 14. Acquiring this right of way and impacting the trees did not seem pmdem. Impacts to the wetland will be rumor zed by using inslopes of various values suggested by State Aid Standards. Inslopes along wetland areas will be at a 1:4 slope from the shoulder to a point 30-feet from the edge of shoulder, and then at a 1:3 slope to the bottom of the slope. Inslopes will be at a 1:6 slope at the comer radius for intersecting roads and driveways. According to Metro Water Resources Engineering, wetland impacts from this project will be mitigated by wetland banking credits. The county will obtain wetland credits for this project from the Minnesota Board of Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR). VIIL NUTIGATION Mitigation for project impacts is discussed in Section VII, above. Particular attention should be paid to the subheadings listed below: Right of Way Vegetation Wetlands IX. PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT (PERMITS/APPROVALS) The project manager has been in contact with city and county staff regarding this project The design for the project will be submitted for review by local authorities, including City of Chanhassen and Carver County Highway Department Motorists will be notified of the project start date and possible traffic delays by placing highway - warning signs along the project prior to the start of construction. A public information meeting is not planned for this project A NPDES permit is needed for this project Municipal consent is not needed, since this project improves the safety of the intersection. The county will obtain wetlandcredit for this project from BWSR X. GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS AND EXCEPTIONS Based on the Design Standards Documentation Requirements and on the Type of Work, TH 101 will be designed to Mri DOT'S Preservation standards and CSAH 14 will be designed to Minnesota State - aid standards at Minnesota Rule 8820.9920 - Geometric design standards; rural and suburban undivided; new or reconstruction projects. See the Design Appendix for the Geometric Design Standards Tables. Page 8 61e: NNOOT ppr$.g1561i0..1'I;ROJLCi' 9(6afEOM.MIJM_FOII IJp}li (TA_1010 AT C$AH 14) PROJECT MEMORANDUM - S.P.1009-14 (T.11.101/ CSAH 141 `'-- XI. LEVEL OF ACTION This project is a Federal Categorical Exclusion (Class 11 Action Category 23 CFR 771.117 (d) 1). It is mcluded in a State Exemption category as well (Minn. R. Ch. 4410.4600 subpart 14 c. It is therefore excluded from further environmental documentation. There are no extraordinary circumstances such as: 1. Significant impacts on the environment; 2. Substantial controversy on environmental grounds; 3. Significant impacts to Section 4(f) or 106 property; 4. Inconsistency with any federal, state or local law or administrative determination relating to the environment. XH. FINAL REPORT DISTRIBUTION CHECKLIST Distribution Locations ! Distribution by: I Office/Department I Copies Inside Mn/DOT District DetailedDesin 1 _ Construction Other Metro Division documentation file 1 Central Office District File Public Hearing File Outside INIn/DOT District Metropolitan Council Regional Develc2mem Commission Munici aliies): Chanhassen 1 Coun ies):Carver County Highway Dept, I Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 3 Federal Highway Administration Other: Central Office Federal Highwayffighway Administration United States Fish and Wildlife Service _ Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minnesota Department of Agriculture Other. Page 9 F9c OLVDO'f.DO(Sy156134.1]yAOICCT N EO". M OR 10 14 (M 1010 AT C 14) PROJECT MEMORANDum - S.P.1009-14 (T.m 101/ CSAH 14) APPENDIX ♦ Project Funding Report ♦ Activity Report ♦ Geometric Design Table, TH 101 ♦ Safety of Design Exceptions along this Project ♦ Geometric Design Table, C.S.A.H 14 ♦ DNR Letter dated April 17, 2003 ♦ SHPO response to request for consultation ♦ Contaminated Property Review ♦ Threatened and Endangered Species ♦ Comments from MnDOT Forestry Unit ♦ Metro District Tree Policy ♦ Letter form City of Chanhassen, to Mr. Don Halla dated 10/4/94, notifying Mr. Halla of conservation easement on trees ♦ Highway Capacity Manual - All -Way Stop capacity analysis ♦ Synchro 5 signalized capacity analysis Page 10 iac eavuor_ .�ae¢ore� em¢wu+o� Eoa �OMujiH_Im wr a.+e M ��. Minnesota Department of Transportation Fund Listing by Project Date: Oct 29, 2003 Dist: M Area: C SP: 1009-14 Status:Active Route Type: TH Route: 101 County: Carver 10 Let Date: 10/22y04 Program: SC Project Manager: Geoff Prelgo/Geoff Prelgo Phase: P, R Const Cost: $920,000.00 Description: AT PIONEER TRAIL IN CHANHASSEN-CHANNELIZE AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION Current Estimate: $920,000.00 Relocation: Primary Work Type: Traffic Control Devices Center Lane Miles: (1.00 Original Estimate: $545,000.00 Unit Of Measurement: English Original Let Date: 10/22/04 Parcels: 8 Note: Ties: nine Fed Fed IEncum SP Code Org Code Estimated Amount Let Amount Encumbered $ Post Award Amount Code Proi No. i Date 1009-14 02 4437058 $600,000.00 SF 1003 1009-14 04 4433058 $460,000.00 LF 1004 1009-14 04 4433058 $460,000.00 SF 1004 Estimates: Grand Totals Mlles: 0.00 P. E. $0.00 R/W $600.000.00 E&C $0.00 CONST $920,000.00 AGREE $0.00 UTILITY $0.00 STATE AID $0.00 TRANSIT $0.00 ENHANCEMENT $0.00 PARTNERSHIP $0.00 JUNK YARD $0.00 OTHER $0.00 TOTAL: $1,520,000.00 it ORDER BY LET DATE, ROUTE NUMBER Page: 1 WHERE Project Status IN'PRO%'ACT' AND, SP Numbers 1009-14 Districts IN'M' Mn/DOT INTERNAL - OTS, PROJECT MANAGEMENT SCIEDULF, FOR METRO Page 1 of 1 SP: 1009-14 MY: 101 CNTY: DESCRIPTION: AT PIONEER Carver STATUS: Active ORG.LET, 10-22-04 CUR.LET: 2-25-05 TRAIL IR cuAueASsEN-mANNELIZE AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION PROGRAM: SC I= TYPE: Traffic COotrol Devices ORG.COST: $545,000 MI: 0 EEG.RV.PNT: 010+00.261 COST EST CEANGB, CUR -COST: $920,000 FY: 05 END RH-PMT• 010+00.261 AUTE DATE: AGREE AR �'0 armed , LYDn ---PARCELS: 8 RSLOCS: ANY: R/W COST: $D - $600,000 - -- - PERM. PROD. MGE. PrelgO, Geoff FIR. DES. PROD. USE. Prelgo, Geoff RES. ING. Panek,M DESIGN ENG: Y00, Nancy HUNG DESIGNATORS: SF,LF PLANS READY DATE: - SECONDARY NNE TYPES: NOTE. - JOB NUMBERS: 1009-14: P--T51117, R=T57047 ' ASSOCIATED SPS: TIES: ACT SUN DESCRIPTION $ REM EARLY EARLY LATE LATE TOTAL ACTUAL ACTUAL _ _____________________ DUR COX DUE START FINISH START FINISH BLOAT START H117ZS1 10START 0 ___ IOU ____ 0 ________ ________ 8-22-02 ________ ________ _______ ________ _ 1032 DISTRICT LAND SURVEY 90 100 0 0 8-12-02 0-12- 1040 DESIGN SURVEYS 30 IOU 0 10-1-03 0 7-26-03 10-1- 1070 PROJECT MEMORANDUM 90 70 6-1-03 0 4-23-03 6-1- 1140 PIIHAL GEOMETRIC LAYO 27 11-23-03 12-24-03 9-27-03 10-23-03 -62 1-25-03 1160 HIHA7 DESIGN MAPPING 30 90 3 12-25-03 12-27-03 10-31-03 11-2-03 -55 3-17-03 1165 SIGNAL JUSTZPICATION 30 30 100 0 2-4-03 0 10-23-02 2-4- 3.180 SOILS SURVEY & LRTTE 0 30 11-28-03 12-27-03 11-9-04 12-8-04 347 1181 SOILS REVIEW & APPRO 60 0 60 12-28-03 2-25-04 a-25-04 10-23-04 241 1195 UTILITY COORDINATION 30 0 30 2-26-04 3-26-04 10-24-04 11-22-04 241 1200 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 60 0 60 1-27-04 3-26-04 -10-25-04 12-23-04 272 3200M CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 100 90 10 12-25-03 1-3-04 30-24-03 11-2-03 -62 1-24-03 1210 TITLE ORDER 0 0 0 1-3-04 1-3-04 11-3-03 11-3-03 -62 1220 R/W PACRAGB 84 100 0 30-1-03 0 8-1-03 iD-1- 1225 ISO 0 ISO 1-4-04 6-1-04 11-3-03 3-31-04 -62 PLOTS -PRELIM. 6 pYEA 1230 R/W PREACQUISITION 90 25 68 11-28-03 2-3-04 1-24-04 3-31-04 57 4-4-03 1235 VALUATION lea 0 ISO 4-11-04 10-7-04 8-29-04 2-24-05 140 1240 REAL ESTATE PURCHASE ISO 0 ISO 5-3-04 9-29-04 3-2-04 7-29-04 -62 1249 FINAL HYDRAULICS DES 240 0 240 8-31-04 4-27-05 6-30-04 2-24-05 -62 1250 ROAD PLANS 60 90 6 12-25-03 12-30-03 11-17-04 11-22-04 328 4-20-03 1251 SIGNAL PLANS 90 0 90 1-27-04 4-25-04 9-24-04 12-22-04 241 1254 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN 30 50 15 1-27-04 2-10-04 12-9-04 12-23-04 317 5-15-03 1275M PROJECT TURN IN 30 0 30 1-27-04 2-25-04 11-24-04 12-23-Ot 302 1280 PERMITS 0 0 0 4-25-04 4-25-04 12-24-04 12-24-04 317 1290 AGREEMENTS - MUNICIP 45 25 34 4-26-04 5-29-04 12-23-04 1-25-05 241 4-IS-03 1294 AGREEMENTS _ SIGNALS 45 0 45 2-26-04 4-10-04 1-4-OS 2-17-05 313 1298M R/W SPECIAL PROVISIO 45 0 0 45 2-11-04 3-26-04 1-4-OS 2-17-05 328 1300 P S L E 0 0 5-10-05 5-10-05 1-5-05 1-5-05 -125 1310 LETTING 25 0 25 4-28-05 5-22-05 12-24-04 1-17-05 -125 ...1320M R/W ACQUISITION COMP 1 0 1 6-30-OS 6-30-05 2-25-05 2-25-05 -125 0 0 0- 9-22-05 9-22-OS 9-22-05 9-22-05 -125 http:/hvww2.dot.state.mn.us/eua�serv/techsup/projdev/pmu/metro/index.htin 12/4/2003 Geometric Design Standards (T'.H. 101) (form-pdstcd t LnR'01) HighwaV Tvnn 7F =Fwo-);ane Hi wa}, Rmat -Mani=haze iJivtdgdiY- wa Ruual - Two Lane Hi wa ,Urban Multi -lane Divided 1p:ShwaX, Urban S tiewl Freewa , Rural Multi -lane Divided Hi wa ,Urban w Speed) Freeway, Urban Multi -lane Undivided Hipway, Urban (Low Dealgn Standard: Design of this project will follow MnDOT's M Preservation ( ) New Consttuction/Reconsttuction standards for the above referenced highway type. Design Parameters: Functional Class: ( ) Principal Arterial M Minor Arterial ( ) Collector Terrain: yf, ( ) Level, M Rolling ( ) Rough Traffic Velairie: Current ADT 5900 vehJday (based on ( ) actual counts, 00 traffic flow may, dated 2002) Posted Speed: 40 mph Design Unit: Tills preject fill be designed in ( ) metric units (X) English units. M Existing and Proposed Typical Sections are in the appendix. QQ Reduced layout is included in appendix. Critical Decion R.trm>..ro T.,i.te Critical Design- _-_E_c Proposed MnDOT Standard for Reference Element Condition. Condition New Construction/ MnDOT Road Design Sneed Minimum Minimum Reconstruction Design Speed selected for this project is 55 mph. This design Design Manual Table 2-5.07A speed will be used to look up the values in this table, under the column labeled "MADOT Standard for New Construction/Reconstruction" for. Stopping Sight Distance Horizontal Sight Distance Vertical Alignment, K value;. Crest and Sag The design speed should fall within the ranges given in Table 2-5.07A, and should teal or exceed the lLosted speed limit Lane Width 12 ft 12 ft 12 ft Chapter 2, Shoulder Width Section 2-7.0 Right 2-4 ft 9.5 ft Usable, 95 ft Usable, Table 4-4.01 A 8.0 ft Paved 8.0 ft Paved Or Table 4-401C Left NA NA NA Table 4-4.01B Bridge Shoulder Width Right NA NA NA Table 9-2.01A Left NA NA NA Table 9-2.01A Horizontal Clearance NA NA NA Section 4-6.05 to Obstructions Bridge Structural 11 NA All new bridges to bave Chapter 9, C202CitY ME 22.5 (HS-25) Section 9-2.0 Miammin design load Stooping SLht 4-0 ft 140 ft 550 ft min. Table 2-5.09A Distance DS1-adoc s:j Critical Design Eaistine Proposed MnDOT Standard for Reference Element Condition Condition New Construction/ MnDOT Road Minimum Minimum Reconstruction Design Manual Aorizoutal_ --- 1042-R mm=UIn7- .- Table-3-2-:03hor --- No Change Ali nmen - Radius No Change Table 3-2.03B Grades. Percent 8 % maximum 8% 6% maximum Table 311.02A No change VertiuntlAli men - K value Crest 10 ft/O/n min. 10 fU°/n min. 220 N% min. Figure 34.04A Sag 27 N% min. 27 fV/u min. 130 ft/°/u min. Figure 3-4 04D Normal Cross Slope 0.02 Table 4-3.OlA Superelevation 0.06 maximum Chapter 3, Section 3-3.0 Vertical Clearance NA NA 5.0 in (16 ft4 in) Table 9-2.0113 Highway under bridge Railroad under bridge NA NA 7.0 in (23 ft-0 in) Highway under sign or NA NA 5.3 in (17 ft4 in) pedestrian bridge Table Notes: An asterisk preceding proposed condition indicates a Geometric Design Exception. See Geometric Design Exception Justification below for additional information. Intetstate/STRAIMT system This project does not involve work on the Intetstate/STRAHNET system. ( ) This project involves work on the Interstate./STRAHNET system. ( ) At the completion of this project, all bridges will meet the 4.9 in (16 foot) standard for vertical clearance over Interstate highways. () At the completion of this project the vertical clearance of the bridge will remain unchanged. The scope of work involves limited repair of the bridge or roadway pavement The project scope does not provide the opportunity to alter the vertical clearance situation. FHWA will be requested to coordinate with the Department of Defense — MTMCrEA at least three months before letting.. Preservation projects where Proposed Critical Elements are less than the New Construction Reconstruction standard[ The fpllOVAM standards New Conctnmrtinn / c... —A... .e:_ _ Critical Location (Ref. Point) Existing / me -- -1 on 55 mph Critical nun xGUUR Ul 1II Existing / III1. Existing / Element Proposed Critical Element value Proposed Critical Proposed Critical Element value Element Element corresponding corresponding Design Speed Design Speed Stopping 140 ft 550 ft (RDM) 23 mph (2001 AASHTO 23 mph sight distance Horizontal 546 1042 43 mph ali Grade 8% 6% 40mph NA Vertical exert 10 fU°A 220 fV% 20 h 24 h Vertical sag 27 fVOA 130 tiN/s 23mph 25 h TH 101 does not meet the h4nDOT Road Design Manual (RDM) standards for the critical elements listed. The horizontal alignment (assuming 6% superelevation) and grades meet the standards for a 40 mph design speed. The stopping sight distance, vertical crest and sag correspond to a 20 mph design speed. Metro Traffic Engineering examined crashes for the three years 2000 through 2002. They looked at the segment from RP 10.145 to 10.377, plats approximately 500 feet north and south of that segment In three years, there were 12 crashes. Six of the crashes occurred at the intersection with Pioneer Trail, most of them related to a violation of the traffic control device. The rest of the crashes occurred for various reasons (deer, driver distraction, fell asleep, emergency vehicle, etc), but none of them listed a sight restriction or grade as the reason for the crash. H 101 — about 800 feet south of CSAH 14, looking north toward the intersection. Ink !.Ja 9 TH l0labout 800 feet north of CSAH 14, looking south toward the intersection. Traffic Handling During Construction See Traffic Forecast section of Project Memorandum. Bicycle and Pedestrian Considerations According to Minnesota State Bicycle Transportation Plan (Mn/DOT, 1987), this project "oton-a-Major-Bi ycie-Travel-Comdos— - is on a Major Bicycle Travel Corridor. The Project is on a highway section rated as: M ( ) Satisfactory ` A in need of improvement (see attached) () has an alternative route identified (see attached). See Bicycle and Pedestrian Section of Project Memorandum for additional information. Layout Status: - A geometric layout is not required for this project. A level 3 Geometric Layout was prepared. Level 3 projects do not require layouts (and therefore do not require approval). Lake Minnewash{a Y� `y J Bl I CITY OF CHANHASSEN PARKLAND & TRAILS/5IDEWALKS i' /V EXISTING TRAIlJSMEWALK OVERPASS N PROPOSED TRA➢./SIDEWALK UNDERPASS -_- MINOR ROADS ^` TRAIL HEAD /V MAJOR ROADS O CITY HALL HIGHWAYS SCHOOL "—: CITY PARKLAND CARVER COUNTY PARK LAND G' MN LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM 1-1 BLUFF CREEK GOLF COURSE = FEDERAL AN VALLEY NAT. WILDLIFE REFUGE O STATE WILDLIFE MANAGEMENTAREA 11D.'HA 0 IJ00 a3a0 3�00 sAap,y ® n W a a e i ` w —%\j7% `�1 F-T / . Wm m smnoau Qpi Minnesota Department of Transportation Memo Metropolitan Division Mail Stop 050 Waters Edge Building 1500 W. County Road 8-2 Roseville, MN. 55113-3174 Date: December 18, 2003 To: Jolene Servatius Metro Traffic From: Rick Dalton Project Documentation Unit Office Tel: 651/634-2175 Fax 6511582-1308 Subject: S.P. 1009-14 (TM.101)— safety of design exceptions along this project. A Design Exception or critical sub -standard design element has been located on this project at the following locations: Location (mile point) Critical Design Enstrne Condition, Promesed Mn/DOT Standard for New Construction/ Reconstruction From To Element Condition Minimum Minimum 10.145 10.377 Stopping Sight Distance 140 it 140 fi 550fi 10229 10252 Grade 8% 8% 6% 10.147 10.231 Vertical Crest 25 fl/% 25 iV% 220 fl(% 10.358 10.377 Vertical Crest 10 iV°k 10 ffl% 220 ft(% 10.252 10.295 Vertical Sag 27 f (% 130 ft/% We need to know if there are any crash problems related to these sub -standard critical elements. We will document your results in our Project Memorandum- A sample statement is shown below. "The outside shoulder width is 2.4 m (8 ft), 1.8 m (6ft) paved, from CSAH 1210 Poplar Drive (a distance of 2.4 miles). Mn/DO7"S New Construction/Reconstruction standard calls for the outside shoulder width to be 3.0 m (9.8 ft), 2.4 m (7.8, t)-paved Accident records were checked, and the narrower shoulders do not appear to be causing an accident problem. Shoulders will not be widened under this project." Please reply by 12131iO3. Thanks. Traffic Section Determination: We exanamed crashes for the three years 2000 through 2002. We looked at the segment from RP 10.145 to 10.377, plus approximately 500 feet north and south of that segment. In three years, there were a total of 12 crashes. Six of the crashes occurred at the intersection with Pioneer Trail, most of them related to a violation of the traffic control device. The rest of the crashes occurred for various reasons (deer, driver distraction, fell asleep, emergency vehicle, etc), bun none of them listed a sight restriction or grade as the reason for the crash. C:\Documents and Settingsliveclgre000V_opl Setting$\Temp\Desio i.dac Geometric Desit=_n Standards (C.S.A.H. 14) 0updated Iln_.rop Hi hwav T e Two-LaneAwAwa , Rural- -ems- - Mnitr-laae-Divided-Hi wa—Kutai - Two bane Hi ghway, Urban - - Multi -lane Divided Highway, Urban Speed) Freeway, Rural Multi -lam Divided Highwa , Urban (Low speed) Freeway, Urban Multi -lane Undivided Highway, Urban (Low Speed) D_esien Standard: Design of CSAH 14 will follow Minnesota State -aid standards at Minnesota Rule 8820.9920 - Geometric design standards; Waal and suburban undivided; new or reconstruction projects. Design Parameters: Functional Class: () Principal Arterial (X) Minor Arterial ( ) Collector Terrain: () Level (X) Rolling () Rough Traffic Volume: Current ADT 7500 veh./day (based on ( ) aeWal counts, () traffic flow mar) dated 2002) Posted Speed: 45 mph Design Unit: This project fill be designed in ( ) metric units ( ) English units. (X) Fodsting and Proposed Typical Sections are in the appendix M Reduced layout is included in appendix. Critical Design Elements Table Critics Existing Proposed Minnesota State -aid Reference Element Condition. Conditionstandards at MaDOT Road Minimum Minimum MR 8820.9920 Design Manual or MR 8820.9920 Design Speed Design Speed selected for this project is 45 mph. This design MR 8820.9920 speed will be used to look up the values in this table, under the column labeled "MnDOT Standard for New Construction/Reconstruction" for. Stopping Sight Distance Horizontal Sight Distance Vertical Alignment, K value; Crest and Sag The desiga speed should fall within the ranges given in Table 2-5.07A, and should equal or exceed the posted speed limit. Lane Width 12 ft 12 it 12 ft MR 8820.9920 Shoulder Width Riebt 5-10 ft 8 ft - 8 ft MR 8820.9920 Left NA NA NA Table 4-4.0113 Bridge Shoulder Width Riebt NA NA NA Table 9-2.01A Left NA NA NA Table 9-2.01A Horizontal Clearance NA NA NA Section 4-6.05 to Obstructions Bridge Structural NA NA NA Chapter 9, CapacitVSection 9-2.0 Stooping Sight 457 ft 457 ft 400 ft min. Table 2-5.09A Distance Horizontal No Curves No Curves 677 ftmin. Table 3-2.03A or ' nmen Radius Urban. & Rural Table 3-2.0313 DSI-adoc Critical Design Eaistino Proposed Minnesota State -aid Reference Element Condition Condition, standards at MnDOT Road Minimum Minimum MR 8320.9920 Design Manual or Grades. Percent 2.6 % mammumm - — ---AdR3820--_M 2.6% 5-6 % maximum Rtral Table 3-4.02A - - No 7-8 % maximum Urban Vertical Alignment K value Crest 157 ft/"/o min. 157 NO% min. 12o wo/o min. Figure 3-4.04A S Normal Cross Slone NA NA 90 ft/% min. 0.02 Fig ne 3 4.04D Table 4-3 JA Snperelevation 0.06maximum 7aWter3, Section3-3.0 Vertical Clearance Highway under bridge NA NA 5.0 in(16 11-4 in) Table 9-2.01B Railroad under bridge NA NA 7.0 m (23 ft-0 in) Highway under sign or NA NA 5.3 in (11 ft- Ain) pedestrian bridge Table Notes: An asterisk preceding proposed condition indicates a Geometric Design Exception. See Geometric Design Exception Justification below for additional information. Other applicable state -aid standards: - 1:4 minimum inslopes - 30-foot recovery area - The recovery area is an obstacle-$ee area (measured from edge of traffic lane) - 10-ton pavement design. InferstateJS'fRAHNET system � This project does not involve work -on -the InterstateJS-T-R-AI$1ET-s ystm ( ) This project involves work on the Interstate/STRAIiNEi' syatem ( ) At the completion of this project, all bridges wr71 meet the 4.9 in (16 foot) standard for vertical clearance over Interstate highways. () At the completion of this project the vertical clearance of the bridge will remain unchanged The scope of work involves limited repair of the bridge or roadway pavement The project scope does not provide the opportunity to alter the vertical clearance situation. FHWA will he requested to coordinate with the Department of Defense - MTMCTEA at least three months before letting. Preservation projects where proposed Critical Elements are less than the New Construction Reconstruction standard: Not applicable. Geometric Design Exception Justification Within this section please justify the design exceptions (if any) noted in the Critical Design Elements table above. Refer to Section 2-6.01.01 of the MnDOT Road Design Manual for additional guidance on Geometric Design Exceptions. None. Traffic Handling During Construction Roadway will be kept open during constmction. Flagging will be required while materials are being hauled in or out For centerline culvert replacement we can require doing it % at a time and flag traffic through Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55155.4010 April 17, 2003 Geoffry Prelgo MDOT Metro Division 1500 West County Rd. B2 Roseville, MN 55113 RE: TH 101 Intersection Reconstruction at Pioneer Trail (S-P. 1009-14), Natural Resources and Recreational Resources Questionnaire, Carver County Dear Mr. Prelgo: The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has completed our review of the Natural and Recreational Resources Questionnaire for the above -referenced project located in Section 25, T116N, R23W in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County County. There are very few comments from DNR on this project No Public Waters Basins, Wetlands, or Watercourses are directly impacted by this project A DNR Public Waters Work Permit is not eq- a The Minnesota Natural Heritage database has been reviewed to determine if any rare plant or animal species or other significant natural features are known to occur within an approximate one -mile radius of the TH 101 Intersection Reconstruction (S.P.1009-14) project area. Based on this review, there are 23 known occurrences of rare species or natural communities in the area searched (for details, contact me and I will send database printouts). However, standard construction procedures (e.g. runoff prevention) should ensure that these features remain unaffected by the proposed activity. Because our information is not based on a comprehensive inventory, there may be rare or otherwise significant natural features in the state that are not represented in the database. A county -by -county survey of rare natural features is now underway, and has been completed for Carver County. Our information about natural communities is, therefore, quite thorough for that county. However, because survey work for rare plants and animals is less exhaustive, and because there has not been an on -site survey of all areas of the comity, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist on the project area Thank you for providing the opportunity for early coordination on this project We have no farther comments or concerns at this time. If you have questions regarding this letter, please e-mail me at peterleete@dnr.statc nin us or call at (651) 297-4313. sincerely, Peter Leete DNR Transportation Team Office of Management and Budget Services C: ERDB file 20030756 An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity JN�Ctq m� o Minnesota Department of Transportation ;Fa OF Transportation Building 395 John Ireland Boulevard --gym aul Minnesota 53155 7899 April 16, 2003 Mr. Dennis A. Gimtnestad Government Programs & Compliance Officer State Historic Preservation Office Minnesota Historical Society 345 Kellogg Blvd. W. St. Paul, MN 55101 Direct Line: (651) 296-3243 Mail Stop 620 Re: S.P. 100941 (TH 101 and Pioneer Road Intersection in Chanhassen, Carver County) T 116N, R 23 W, S 25 SHPO No. Pending Dear Mr. Gimmestad: We have reviewed the above referenced project under the Minnesota Historic Sites Act and the Minnesota Field Archaeology Act. The proposed project does not involve federal funds, and it is not likely that the District will be applying for federal funds. It is likely that the project will require a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The current undertaking consists of upgrading the current 4-leg intersection, with each roadway containing two lanes, to a signalized intersection with right turn, left turn, and through lanes for each of the 4 legs. Each leg will be widened approximately 15-20 feet at the intersection, and then tapering back to existing over approximately 600 feet from the intersection (please see the enclosed figure). The District will be acquiring new right-of-way as part of this project; however, at this point they are uncertain how much additional right -of --way will be purchased The area of potential effect (APE) for archaeological resources for the project consists of the proposed construction area; and for architecture/history resources consists of the first tier of adjacent properties. There are no properties within the APE that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the State Register of Historic Places. While Mn/Mcdel rates the general area as having high site potential, since the proposed construction area has been impacted by previous construction activities, the area has a low potential for containing intact archaeological resources. It is the opinion of this office that there are no properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places or the State Register of Historic Places, and no known or suspected archaeological properties within the area to be affected by the Project as currently proposed. If the project scope changes, we will provide an additional review. We are providing you and the Office of the State Archaeologist with this information pursuant to the responsibilities given the Minnesota Historical Society and the State Archaeologist by Minnesota Statues 138.661 to 138.669 and 13831 to 138.42. Please call if you have any questions concerning this project. - Sincerely, Kristen Zschomler Historian Cultural Resources Unit (CRU) encs. -- — -cc: Joe Hudak, Mn/DOT CRU,t�K - - - Mn/DOT CO File ---- Note : Corrected SP 1009-14 MINNESOT-k HISTORICAL SOCIETY STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE May 23, 2003 Ms. Kristen Zschomler Cultural Resource Unit MN Dept. of Transportation Transportation Building, MS 620 395 John Ireland Boulevard St Paul, MN 55155-1899 RE: S.P. 1009-41, T.H. 101 and Pioneer Road Intersection T116 R23 S25, Chanhassen, Carver County SHPO Number. 2003-2188 Dear Ms. Zschomler. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the above project. It has been reviewed pursuant to the responsibilities given the Minnesota Historical Society by the Minnesota Historic Sites Act and the Minnesota Feld Archaeology Act Based on our review of the project information, we conclude that there are no properties listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places, and no known or suspected archaeological properties in the area that will be affected by this project Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36CFR800, Procedures of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation for the protection of historic properties. If this project is considered for federal assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, it should be submitted to our office with reference to the assisting federal agency. Please contact Dennis Gimmestad at (651) 296-5462 if you have any questions regarding our review of this project. Sincerely, Britta L. Bloomberg U Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer C c ae14QA3cr, Maio A Mote : Corrected SP 1009-14 345 krllugg Boulevard W"U&ini Paul Miunrs,xa 5�,102-1906/Telenhunr 661=29(r6i26 Do �o MrtDOT Office of Environmental Services State of Minnesota 395John Ireland Blvd., MS620 Office Memorandum a 2 St Paul, MN 55155-1899 — --- - - -- Date: March 4, 2003 To: Gregg A. Iverson, Transportation Specialist Senior, Metro istrict From: Andrew Nichols, Environmental Assessment Unit C `� Phone: 651-284-3772 Re: S.P. 1009-14, TH 101 at Pioneer Trail in Carver County Contaminated Property Review After reviewing the nature and location of this project and reviewing the HPDP threshold criteria for completing Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, I have determined that a detailed Phase I would not be necessary for this project primarily because it is not in or near any commercial/industrial areas. A review of MPCA GIS files, the Mn/DOT design plan and MrvDOT Videolog did not identify any sites adjacent to the project area that could potentially be impacted by the project. A review of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) geographic information system (GIS) files (dated August 2002) was completed to check for any major known contamination sites in the area. The GIS files contain reported contamination sites (such as superfund, dumps and leaking underground storage tanks sites) and potential contamination sites such as properties where businesses uselstore hazardous chemicals and salvage yards. The review of MPCA GIS files did not identify any sites adjacent to the project area that could potentially be impacted by the project. Attached is a "Contaminated Properties" write-up that you can adapt for use in the TH 101 Project Memorandum. Please call if you have questions or would like additional information. Cc: G. Larson (Wout enc.) o�'1� . Minnesota Department of Transportation �.o Office of Environmental Services of 395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 620 — — StPau,MN-55-t55-i899 -- May 16, 2003 Gregg Iverson Metro Division Document Mangement Section RE: SP 1009-14, TH 101 and Pioneer Trail, Intersection work Carver County Dear Mr. Iverson: Fax: 651/ 284-3754 Phone_65TT284-17-50 -- As you have requested I have reviewed the effects the above referenced project will have upon Federal Threatened and Endangered (T&E) Species. The project county is within the distribution range of the bald eagle and the Higgins Eye Pearly Mussel, Federal T&E Species. If a Federal agency authorizes, funds, or carries out a proposed action, the responsible Federal agency, or its delegated agent, is required to evaluate whether the proposed action °may affect' listed species. If it is determined that the action 'may affect' a listed species, then the responsible Federal agency shall request Section 7 consultation with the USFWS. If the consultation shows `no effect" on the listed species, further consultation is not necessary. According to the information provided by the Natural Heritage Database (updated 1-15-03) maintained by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, there are no known occurrences of Federal T&E Species within the project area. In addition, due to the location and nature of the proposed project, we conclude that the project will not affect Federal T&E Species. If the project is modified or new information becomes available which indicates that listed species may be affected, please contact this office. This review was completed for Federally Listed T&E Species only. For information on State Listed T&E Species, contact the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Sin r fely, ZJ-7 �� eg Busadcer Natural Resource Program Coordinator cc: Gerry Larson Jason Alcott file An equal opportunity employer ����"�� Minnesata Deaartment of Transaortation OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Forestry Unit MS 620 395 John Ireland Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55155 Date: October 30th, 2003 To: Gregg Iverson Transportation Generalist Senior Metro Division Office Tel: (651)284-3791 Fax: (651) 284-3754 From: Paul Voigt icH Q_ NRS / Horticulturist Senior Forestry Unit -Office of Environmental Services Subject: Vegetation Review For S.P. 1009-14 T.H. 101 at C.S.A.H. 14 in Chanhassen 1 am following up on your request for a vegetation review within and around the proposed Koject limits for S.P. 1009-14. Jim Martin (Mn/DOT Metro) and I reviewed the site on October 28 of 2003. The following are my observations and recommendations for the affected areas in terms of potential impacts to the existing vegetation, what should be done to minimize damage to the trees adjacent to the construction limits, and information that will be pertinent to the project concerning the City of Chanhassen's Conservation Easement within the proposed construction area as well as information regarding the City's tree replacement ordinance. General Description of Woody Vegetation: The woody vegetation that lies within and near the proposed construction limits of this project is mainly a mixture of deciduous trees which are part of a naturally occurring "forested" area, but there are some trees (deciduous & coniferous) that were planted as part of a reforestation project by the City of Chanhassen. These trees are planted along the west side of T.H. 101 just north of the intersection of 101 and C.S.A.H. 14. The tree species in this area include the following: SPECIES SIZE QUANTITY 'GREEN ASH 1.0" DBH 2 `GREEN ASH 2.0" DBH 1 'GREEN ASH 2.5" DBH 1 POPLAR 2.0" DBH 1 POPLAR 4.0" DBH 2 POPLAR 5.0" DBH 1 POPLAR 6.0" DBH 1 POPLAR 8.0" DBH 1 *RED PINE 8' HEIGHT 1 *RED PINE 101 HEIGHT *WHITE PINE 10' HEIGHT 1 *WHITE PINE 15' HEIGHT 1 *BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 3' HEIGHT 1 *BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 5' HEIGHT 1 *BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6' HEIGHT 1 *BLACK HILLS SPRUCE T HEIGHT 1 The trees in this area may be on private property, and there may be a need to put a monetary value on these trees and or possibly transplant them to a different location. *These trees may be worthy of transplanting to a different site. The area of vegetation that will be impacted the most is a wooded area that lies along the west side of T.H. 101 Wait# of C.S.A.H. 14. The trees in this area are a mix of Red Oak, Sugar Maple, Basswood, and a few Aspen along the edge nearest T.H. 101. There are also some patches of shrubs (Gray Dogwood, Staghom Sumac) along the edge nearest T.H. 101. The trees range in size from less than 1" diameter (mostly Sugar Maple) to over 20" in diameter (Red Oak). The understory is fairly clean with the exception of a few stray Buckthorn plants growing along the edge. The species mix in this wooded area is indicative of the "Big Woods", however according to the DNR's Heritage Database, this particular sliver of woods is not classified as a Big Woods remnant. Just south of this area (@ half mile) there are some Big Woods remnants. The land in this area is private property. The area that falls into the Conservation Easement will also fall under the City of Chanhassen's tree replacement ordinance in terms of Mn/DOTs responsibility for tree replacement. The areas that do not fall into the easement area will have to be worked out with the individual property owner in terms of restitution for the tree loss. The Conservation Easement covers the wooded area south of C.S.A.H. 14 and west of T.H. 101 in a 60' wide band..1 have attached a map of the area that shows the boundaries of the easement. Impacts / Protection - The impacts to the woody vegetation for this project will occur from the necessary removal of trees on the southwest quadrant of the intersection (approximately 9000 square feet of canopy coverage) and the 18 trees (listed above)located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection (see attached map for locations). It will be very important to have tree protection fence installed along . the Construction limits to avoid any unnecessary damage to trees adjacent to construction activities. As part of the final design process, either a consulting forester, or a member of the O.E.S. Forestry Unit should do a comprehensive Vegetation Protection and Salvage Review (Forestry Plan). This plan should include the following components: • Tree and other woody plant/plant community protection opportunities • Trees and other woody plant transplant opportunities • Timber utilization opportunities • Hazard tree identification It will be very important as part of the construction plan to clearly communicate what will be expected of the Contractor in terms of appropriate treatments for vegetation protection. These treatments must follow what is described in Standard Specifications 2572 and should include but not be limited to: Item No, 2572.501 2572.502 2572.503 2572.504 2572.505 Item Temporary Fence Clean Root Cutting Water Sandy Loam Fill Prune trees Unit meter (linear fcot). -- -meter (linear foot} - - liter (gallon) cubic meter (cubic yard) hour or each There may also need to be appropriate special provisions drafted that will detail any work that needs to be done that is not included in the Standard Specifications. These provisions should also detail any penalties that the Contractor will be responsible for if the work is not performed according to the specifications that were laid out in the contract. The City of Chanhassen Tree Replacement Ordinance The following outlines the City of Chanhassen's requirements for tree replacement. Mn/DOT will be required to follow this ordinance for any tree removal that takes place on City property or within the limits of the Conservation Easement: Sec.20-1178. Generally. (a) It is the policy of the city to preserve natural woodland areas throughout the city and with respect to specific site development to retain as far as practical, substantial tree stands which can be incorporated into the overall landscape plan. (b) No clearcutting of woodland areas shall be permitted except as approved in a subdivision, planned unit development or site plan application. (c) The standards in City Code section 18-61(d) shall be used in evaluating site plans. (Ord. No. 153, § 1, 11-4-91; Ord. No. 204, § 4, 5-9-94) Sec. 18-61 (10) If any protected significant trees are removed or killed or there is a loss of trees as the result of construction activities, the city requires replacement at the rate of two (2) caliper inches per each inch of DBH of the removed, killed, or lost trees. The replacement trees shall be at least two and one-half (2 112) inches caliper and will be species that conform to the List of Desirable Tree Species for Planting in Chanhassen. No more than one-third ( 113) of the trees may be from any one (1) tree species. Other species or sizes may be used as replacement trees subject to approval by the city. Alternately, at the city's discretion, if a developer removes trees within a protected area, the canopy coverage area shall be calculated for that area and a replacement area one and one-half (1.5) times the canopy coverage area that was removed shall be planted. One tree shall be planted for each one thousand eighty-nine (1,089) square feet of required replacement area. Trees shall be from the list of desirable tree species, no more than one-third (1/3) of trees from any one (1) tree species, average two -and -one -half -inch caliper with a minimum one -and -one -half -inch caliper, a similar species as vegetation existing on site, and appropriate to the soil conditions. Any replacement trees that cannot be planted on the original site due to space restrictions shall be planted on city property at locations to be determined by the city. If there are any questions regarding the tree ordinance, or the Conservation Easement, please contact Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resource Specialr the Cityof�hasseltat(352y22TL__ 1133. ist fa If there are any questions regarding my comments please feel free to contact me. Also, when final Construction limits are established, I would be available to conduct a more comprehensive Forestry Plan and also give recommendations on tree valuations. cc: Geoffrey Prelgo Richard Elasky Leo Holm Forestry Unit i OUANT. SIZE RANGE e 2'-S' DSH 4 14-3' DEN 2 2 18'-10' HT 4 3'-7'1IT T CANDIDATES i POTEM M!A OF MEN LOSS DUI TO CONSTRUCTION (® 9000 SO. FT. OF CMOPY LOSS) .� PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEPARTMENT : WDOT — Metro Division Golden Valley Office DATE : July 29. 1992 TO: Scott Bradley Environmental Services Section Landscape Unit - FROM : Glen C. Ellisu.,q) District Final Design Engineer PHONE :593—E502 SUBJECT :Metro Division Landscape Guidelines Si-0OCOfi-0519B61 STATE OF MINNESOTA �+ Office Memorandum I am sending to you a copy of the landscape guidelines which I have been working on for sometime for. the Metro Division. I have bad these guidelines reviewed by the staff, and they have indicated that I can distribute these guidelines to personnel in the Metro Division provided it is cleared by Maintenance. I bave reviewed the guidelines with Maintenance and have incorporated their comments. The attached guidelines have been given the okay by Golden Valley Maintenance after discussion with others in the Metro Division. It is my understanding that it is your intent to use this as a basis for preparing a statewide policy. If you need any questions answered regarding these guidelines or if you need further information. please give me a call. I will be distributing copies of these guidelines to a number of Metro Division personnel very shortly. GCE:dcr Attachment cc: Mike Christensen Glen Ellis DEPARTMENT CF TPANsPCRTAT;cN -cffit of Er mnm ntal Sams, F4r.124 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE MEMORANDUM - - _ DATE August 26, 4992 To:. District Engineers, Assistant District Engineers of and Area Maintenance Engineers q 1 f F .Ok Lawrence E. Foote, Director Scott Bradley, Chief h. �d o�J Office.of Environmental Services Landscape Unit -I PHONE - (612) 296-1637 1 (612) 296-5772 suBJEOT: PROPOSED STATEWIDE LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES First of all, "hats off' to the Metro Division and Glen Ellis for the hard work and long hours that went into formulating the language and obtaining the approvals for "Metro Division Landscape Guidelines.' Glen did an excellent job in this regard. Based upon his coordination with Environmental Services staff, we can say the "Metro Division Landscape Guidelines' embody the spirit and substance of a landscape program we continue to advocate statewide. in fact, a proactive landscape program has been advocated by environmental staff within this Department since the 1930s when the Roadside Development Unit did a very good job of implementing and maintaining roadside landscaping, community and state entrances, and wayside rests, spending about 1 percent of the Department's construction budget It Is our recommendation that all Districts adopt, distribute and utilize these "guidelines" as statewide guidelines in order to make consistent, balanced and wise decisions in terms of highway landscaping. Scott Bradley will be arranging times with you this fall to discuss your ideas and concems related to the landscape program. At that time, Scott would also like to review programmed, recommended and potential landscape projects and activities with you and your staffs for the purposes of developing and maintaining a 5-year activity schedule consistent with District and Central Office priorities. SB:jm cc: D. P. R. J. W G. Durgin Hughes Hoffman Sandahl Crawford Workman R. Stehr M. Linzie R. Hill R. Dineen W. Murphy D. Carlson R. Pletan M. Robinson. A. Schenke6erg G. Ellis ✓ E.S. Unit Chiefs J. Reierson Landscape Unit 1� METRO DIVISION 7-91 Revised 7-92 GUIDELINES ON tANDSCAPIJ MZTIGAT7GN a>in_OppORT¢NITIES __ _ -- ON TRUNK HIGHWAY PROJECTS These guidelines are provided for Metro Division personnel to use in determining appropriate or desirable commitments to local agencies for landscape mitigation and i-mprovement opportunities and to determine appropriate pay items for trunk highway construction projects. These guidelines are provided in order to make consistent, balanced and wise decisions regarding highway corridor improvements and use of trunk highway construction dollars, and to minimize long term maintenance costs. The Purpose of these guidelines is to be consistent in the provision of landscaping throughout our Division by their application. Every effort, however, should be made to satisfy local desires consistent with them.' "Contact the Landscape Unit, Environmental Services Section for assistance and recommendations in regards to Mn/DOT's overall landscape program and long range ".scheduling priorities. These guidelines will consist of the following: (1) All trees and shrubs on proposed trunk highway construction projects will be reviewed by a Mn/DOT forester or landscape architect as soon as the project manager or designer can determine what trees and shrubs are affected by the layout or design. The forester or landscape architect will provide written recommendations to the project manager or designer for protection, transplanting, or disposition of all affected trees and shrubs. (2) Inplace trees or shrubs are to be protected and left inplace whenever possible. This may require measures to revise the design such as increasing (steepening) slopes slightly, placing temporary fence at tree drip lines or around shrub beds, or providing short, inexpensive retaining.walls where necessary. High value trees may require additional measures sucb.as clean root cutting and watering. Always keep in mind when making design revisions that safety clear zones, intersection sight lines, maintenance of the roadway. '(including snow and ice operations), and hydraulics are important factors to consider. The designer will need to review projects with the Maintenance Superintendents and Subarea SuPe;visors for input..__-Safety,_however;_must-always take-precedence-i-n-a— _ considered, balanced manner over tree and shrub preservation. (3) Trees and shrubs which are identified as being transplantable should be reused on the project to the extent possible and if excess remains, they should be planted on other DOT property where needed. Transplanting trees or sbrubs to wetland mitigation areas may enhance their habitat value and may be credited to the wetland bank. If there are no areas within the project limits to use transplantable trees, they may be offered first to Maintenance and second to the City after a determination that they are not useable on other Mn/DOT projects. If they are offered to the City, the costs and the work iirvolved will be their responsibility. (4) New trees, shrubs and landscaping may be provided for trunk highway projects consistent with the latest Mn/DOT Guidelines and Priorities for Landscaping State Highways dated March 5 1991. Landscape projects will normally be done under separate contract in accordance with the Office Memo dated October 10, 1990, from E.E. Ofstead and L.F. McNamara on Programming of Landscape Projects. Replacement in kind situations may exist when trees or landscaping are located on right of way or within an area to be acquired as an easement or right of way for a trunk highway project. For guidance in these cases, and cases providing landscape enhancement opportunities, see the Highway Project Development Process (Project Managers Handbook) Volume 2B - Vegetation Section. Contact the Landscape Unit. Environmental Services Section for further advice and recommendations. (5). When right of way is needed for a project and trees and shrubs are inplace and on 0�-r+r pens at.on -For property purchased from a private property owner, ..�-�Pv�zw,�� those trees and shrubs in temporary Eby p ry easements or partial takings ire normally the property owner as part of the right of way. settlement. Rarely should they be handled as part of a design project, but in some cases that may be necessary. If the right of way taking is a total taking, then we can consider tree transplanting from that parcel as part of the project. a) Tree or shrub transplanting caused .by the State's 100% participating width will be paid for 100% by the State. b) Tree or shrub transplanting caused by additional width to be maid for 100a by the municipality will be paid for 100% by the municipality. c) Tree or shrub removal from a project by a municipality shall be paid 100% by the municipality. d) Replacement of trees or shrubs planted by a municipality in an area to be acquired as an easement or right of way will be paid 100% by the State. e) Replacement of trees or shrubs planted by a municipality within the right of 'Way, or measures to protect inplace trees planted by a municipality within the right of way, will be paid 100% by the municipality. f) If trees an shrubs are not considered replacement and are included at the request of the municipality, the State may participate up to 50% if appropriate in accordance with the State Partnership Landscaping Program. Landscaping planted at the direction of the State for purposes of snow control, glare screen,- crash buffers, `aiidliTe habitat -or' enYiancemen o ?Y—e "- highway will be paid for 100% by the State. g) Tree and/or shrub maintenance for those items whose cost are participated in by the municipality shall be the municipality's responsibility. h) Planting of native grasses and wildflowers at the direction of the State will be paid for 100% by the State. i) Planting of native grasses and wildflowers initiated by a City will be done by the City by permit and .the installation will be paid 1002 by the city. The State may furnish the seeds with the approval of the Agricultural Engineer. Environmental Services Section. Planting of native grasses and wildflowers included in a non -Interstate -trunk highway project as part of a Landscape Partnership may be participated in by the State vp to 50%. Maintenance in either case shall be the municipality's responsibility. (6) Landscaping may be installed on a trunk highway by a City by permit, it may be ineluded-in-our-contract-at-guest of —the and paifor by the City wtl-: maintenance by the City, or in some cases it may be installed on a non -interstate trunk highway with cost participation of up to 50% by Mn/DOT with maintenance by the .City as part of a Landscape Partnership. All of these situations involve Mn/DOT approval. They may also require concurrence by AFSCME, which will normally be handled by Environmental Services. (7) The use of wildflowers and native grasses should be considered for use on projects in rural, and possibly suburban areas. Protecting or transplanting inplace plantings shall also be considered. Native grasses that are available . include tall grasses, short grasses that require no mowing, and salt tolerant grasses. Salt tolerant grasses (Mixture 400) may be especially desirable on �J urban boulevards and adjacent to the shoulder on urban trunk highway projects. (B) Funding for landscaping will vary depending upon the type of project, length of project, -and type and location of the roadway. The "project manager or designer will need to review each proposed project with the Landscape Unit to determine either preliminary or more detailed cost estimates for landscaping. (9) It is important that agreement be reached with local agencies regarding maintenance of any new landscaping prior to final commitments being made on its installation. CContact the Agricultural Engineer, Environmental Services Section for further \ advice and recommendations. f` Attachments Cost Participation for Landscaping Office Memorandum dated October 10, 1990. on "Programming of Landscape Projects" Mn/DOT Guidelines and Priorities for Landscaping State Highways Landscape Project Priorities WDOT Landscape Unit "Intent of Landscaping" Pages D-137, to D-147 of Vegetation Section of "Highway Project Development Process" including: Technical Memorandum 87-5-EM-1 on nSalvaging Plant Material on Construction Projects" Guidelines for Tree Transplanting Technical Memorandum 89-20—ME-17 dated May 26, 1989, on "Wildflower Program" __ Partnership. Landscaping Program 28/03 16:55-Fab 9522271110 October 4, 1994 Mr. Don Halla 10000 Great Plains Blvd_ Chaska, MN 55318 Dear Mr. Halla: CITY OF CFDNH9SSE44 _ J k11002 CITY OF r CHANUIL SrN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 0 FAX (612) 937-5739 This letter is to fonnany notify you that on September 26, 1994, the City Council approved the preliminary plat for Subdivision ;#86-31 for Great Plains Golf Estates as shown on the plans dated June 6, 1994, subject to the following conditions: 1. All areas disturbed during site grading -shall tie immediately restored with seed and disc -mulched or wood fiber blanketwithin twp.weeks of completing site grading unless the city's (BMPH) planting;dites dictate .otherwise. All areas disturbed with slopes of 3:1 or greater shall be restored with sod or seed and wood fiber blanket r r. 2. The applicant shall work withibe City in developing a landscaping reforestation plan on the site. This plan shall•"uiciude a list of all trees proposed to be removed and their size The vegetated areas which will not be affected by the development will be protected by a conservation easement The conservon easement shall permit pruning, removal of dead or diseased vegetation and underbrush. All healthy trees over 6" calipel:at 4'. height -shall notbe_pemuued.:to be removed. Staff shall provide a plan which shows the locatien of the pout' vation _easement and,the_ applicant shall provide thelegal description. This -plan sitaR it iuGd a Itst of all trees-aiid size proposed to be removed. The plan shall be submitted prior to final plat approvaL ' Staff shall review the need for screening along Lots;;;-,-3,--3 and 5. Block 4 as it relates to the existing single family homes;-- ili' uth. 3. Lot 4, 5, 7, and 8 Block 3, shall be cii`stom graded and shall provide a tree preservation plan for staff approval prior to issuance of a building permit Staff shall have the right to require a change in house pad and location if it will result in saving significant vegetation. A snow fence shall be placed along the edge of the tree, preservation easement prior to grading. 10/28/03 16:55 FAI 9522271110 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 03 i (O�v1ir�{; Con�rtm6 ��e�Eralf" Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Pioneer Trail & TH 101 8=002 A Lane Configurations t r I t Ideat Flow (Vphp[) 1900 1-" 1900 1900 1900 19W. 19w. 1900 -I900 1900 1900.• 1900 Storage Length (ft) 250 M 250 250 250 250 260 250 Storage Lanes.. Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 - 4.0 4.0 Leading DetqC114c. (ft 25250., .9. 25 250 9. . 2 3w 9 Trailing Detector (ft) 5 9 0 5 9 0 5 . -25: 0 0 6 0 0 e US. Factor 1-00 1.00 Frt I- 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1-00 . . -, - . -& .1 �.- .. I - :�:,O ljol Fit Protected &950 - I - - - - .-il-00 SW.'Fl- '. 4,-� 0.950 0.950 0.950 Fit Permitted 0.700 0269 0.666 0.619 ow (pbr(az AMOAI� WEI 68.3 W . . f'F-�tW, -�16837-3 r A- ft� .--. .- AM ;Am Right Turn on Red Yes yes .. - _.,4 Yes yes Said. Flow. 65 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 1.06 Link. peetl Link Distance (it) 1 1 57 i173 1122 1123 T T, 1 04 -9 volurne (vph) 18 AQ-v 4�-;�- 1 - 624 13 37 88 42 10 206 56 75 1 43 13 FIOW (Vph) 18 624 13 --37' 88 42 10 206 55 75 143 13 4 ----8- 8 2 2 6 '6 10.0 15.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 �num gireen (SJ 23.5 215 23.5 23.5 23.5 -j-e.d C- -.' � 16.6 16.0 16.0 16.0 )W"Taffil' i i IiIiiI'MAXY, - All Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Optim. ? Recall Mode None ne N . one None - Min Min Min Win - Mm Min U-03 '0.73 0.02 0.16 0.10 . Tj 0'.06 0.( 0-.j -02-1 " 0.02""fE60- ..__0 . ...",9"3'�t# �. 6.310.1 3.7 72 6.6 27 112 122 4.4 12.0 11.9 6.5 Approach Delay 'A:- A.-. A 9.9 5.8 10.6 11.7 TH 101 at Pkineer Trail Pat D, Otto -00 pm BWOM Baseline SWIChfO 5 Report rninnesM7-aa5I page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Pioneer Trail & TH 101 S/21/7nnq I wueue Length 5M (ft) 2 117 12 0 2 42 0 16 28 0 '0-. � Link DW (ft) 1077 -.! w Internal 1093 1042 iO43 95th Up block I-Ime 'v -�M� : MUMMIZ6 50th Bay Block Time % Z - (veCYMm- e-n -� h-)'� Queuing Penalty Area Type: Other Actuated C3Fde Length: 45.4 and Phases: 3:PioneerTrail&THI01 TH 101 at Pioneer Trail AM 5:00 pm 819/2002 Baseline Pat D. Otto SYnchro 5 Report minnes]W-2a51 Page 2 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1 Phone: Fax: E-Mail: T ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JJM Agency/Co.: Mn/DOT Traffic Engineering Date Performed: 7/17/2002 Analysis Time Period:° Intersection: TH 101 at Pioneer Trail Jurisdiction: Mn/DOT Analysis Year: 2002 Project ID: TH 101 AT CSAH 14 East/West Street: CSAH 14 North/South Street: TH 101 Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume 18 624 13 Thrus Left Lane 37 88 42 10 206 55 75 143 13 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.96 Flow Rate 681 0.92 0.65 0.72 "c Heavy Veh 2 180 2 317 320 No. Lanes 1 1 2 1 2 Opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 1.00 hrs. 1 Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Flow Rates: Total in Lane Left -Turn Right -Turn Prop. Left -Turns Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 L1 L2 681 180 317 320 18, 40 11 104 13 - 45 64 18 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 • •; " R1grit-7Yirns 0; 04 0.. 3 0-2 ;p. Heavy vehlcle0.0 _ _ _ 0.0 _ 0.0 ,ometry. Group 1 1 adjustments Table 10-40: 1 hLT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 - -IHI L adj _ hadj, computed 1 -7- - ---1 7- - -- -- 1-. 7 - 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Flow rate Ll L2 681 L1 L2 L1 L2 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 180 3.20 3.20 317 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.61 0.16 0.28 hd, final value 6.98 8.00 7.52 x, final value 1.32 0.40 0.66 Move -up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 5.0 6.0 5.5 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Ll L2 L1 L2 Ll L2 Flow Rate 681 180 317 Service Time 5.0 6.0 5.5 Utilization, x 1.32 0.40 0.66 Dep. headway, hd 6.98 8.00 7.52 Capacity 681 409 464 Delay 613.16 16.29 24.92 LOS F C C Approach: Delay 613.16 LOS F Intersection Delay 291.61 16.29 24.92 C - C Intersection LOS`F' 0.1 0.0 0.1 Southbound Ll L2 32p 3.20 3.20 0.28 7.64 0.68 2.0 5.6 Southbound L1 L2 320 5.6 0.68 7.64 458 26.37 D 26.37 D M NNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SIGNAL JUSTIFICATION REPORT for S.P. 1009-14 T.H. 101 at CSAH 14/Pioneer Trail In Chanhassen, Carver County Program: SC (Safety Capacity) Letting Date: February 25, 2005 Funding: SF (State Funds) LF (Local Funds) I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct Supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. A 25043 Lats P.E. Reg. No. REVIEWED: e4MOVED: n �( Metro District Traffic n ' eer -Program Support 7 7 a¢ Date Date: May 24, 2004 S.P. 1009-14 (T.H. 101) T.H. 101 at CSAH 14/Pioneer Trail In Chanhassen, Carver County L PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project consists of installation of a traffic control signal system at the intersection of Trunk Highway 101 (T.H. 101) and CSAH 14/Pioneer Trail in the City of Chanhassen. The new signal system will be full -traffic -actuated with overhead mast arm mounted indications. LED lenses will be installed for all vehicle signal indications facing each approach. Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) detectors and indicator lights will also be installed as part of the new signal system. The 2000 population for the City of Chanhassen is 20,321. T.H. 101 is a two lane undivided north -south highway at the project location. It is classified as a minor arterial and has a posted speed limit of 40 mph. T.H. 101 currently has no turn lanes in either direction at the intersection with CSAH 14/Pioneer Trail. The AADT (2002) on T.H. 101 is 3,500 south of the intersection and 4,500 north of the intersection. CSAH 14/Pioneer Trail is a two lane undivided east -west County State Aid Highway in the City of Chanhassen in Carver County. At the intersection with T.H. 101, the CSAH 14 westbound approach has only a right tam lane while the eastbound approach has no turn lanes. (See existing geometries in the appendix). The posted speed limit on CSAH 14/Pioneer Trail is 45 mph and the AADT (2002) is 7,500 east of T. H. 101 and 5,700 to the west of this location. This intersection is currently controlled by stop signs on all four approaches. II. SCHEDULE AND PROJECT MANAGER Project manager: Mike Gerbensky Signal Design Project Manager 1500 W Co. Rd. B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Telephone number. (651) 634-2394 Estimated letting date: Feb. 25, 2005 2 III. NEED FOR PROJECTIPROJECT DISCUSSION This project will install a new traffic control signal system at this location_ The installation of this signal is part of a safety capacity project to improve and upgrade this intersection by adding both left and right turn lanes to each approach. With the installation of the traffic signal, the existing "right angle" crashes should be minimized and also with the additional turn lanes the capacity will be increased thus reducing the extensive queues and long delays that occur daily at this intersection during the peak hours. (See crash diagrams in the appendix). The overall operation of this intersection should be greatly enhanced with these improvements. IV. PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT The City of Chanhassen, Carver County and Mn/DOT will be required to coordinate funding for the signal system and enter a maintenance agreement with Mn/DOT. V. DESIGN CRITERIA AND EXCEPTIONS No design exceptions to Mn/DOT or AASHTO Standards are required. VI. JUSTIFICATION Justification of this signal system was studied with respect to the warrants outlined in the MiMUTCD. A signal warrant analysis was done using 43-hour counts taken in December, 2001. The traffic volume at the intersection of T.H. 101 at CSAH 14/Pioneer Trail satisfies the requirements of warrant 2 and warrant 7 (crash/volume) is also met_ The traffic signal installation for this intersection is justified and in the best interest of the driving public. See attached signal warrant analysis and collision diagrams in the appendix. VII. APPENDIX A. Project Location Map B. Existing Geometries C. Proposed Geometries D. Signal Warrant Analysis E Collision Diagrams VII. APPENDIX 0 WA M1 �, «: o 'i" fill 5 S I �ra��KP u d" 961p t oeNLLLSa aT. PILE CT. BAXXARA T. ? Ut a011EC CXVE 1'S WLXAY MVE C,- 117. SNAT0. �� Saf3A5' IU CD TOTT T UVE iM 4N U6 IK0011P CT. II4 IOXG 1E.t PT. w CT. N • cm 124 HFlll%S C6L aa. ATEID I�Eo PROJECT �OIIT'�. Lak. z LOCATION RU� z 144 PAIOyRp VAT 1 W �i 14T. S11d1EY@Y CT. 17 ♦� M. rnE " 11P. M.LL1A NYX y '4,�, X. %th ST. CHANHASSEN 2000 POP. 20,321 I PROJECT LOCATION .s�Fa��, T.H. 101 @ PIONEER TRAIL R�Re- CHANHASSEN: MINNESOTA 'roF. 97. BXEICd L0. U6 PX6TDIE PCrt LA. ;DEN PRAIRIE 2000 POP. 54.901 121 TESS CT. IZL 1RFt1TlIN LA. 121. RAIEIli1 M. 124. HCCtAS M. 137. Y.IlD,JtE WAY t% NCRPEMI LIprt9 mz�Ilm 15XIEIINAN YAY 62. CT. �TUXNBULL X0. EDEN PRAIRIE 2000 POP. 54,901 4 / SHAKOPEE 2000 POP. 20,568 �Tral, CSAH 14/PIONEER TR 0 2 t- EXISTING GEOMETRICS I.H. 101 @ PIONEER TRAIL .CHANH:ASSEN, MINNESOTA 0 W I CSAH 14/PIONEER TR 1911E CSAH 14/PIONEER TR PROPOSED GEOMETRICS "4 T.H. 101 @ PIONEER TRAIL��o CHANH'ASSEN, MINNESOTA *�,,TOO' CSAH 14/PIONEER TR r � r MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION METRO DIVISION -TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS LOCATION: CSAH 14 AT TH 101 - COUNTY: CARVER REF. POINT: 10261 - Speed Approach Description Lanes DATE: 12/1712001 45 Major Appt: CSAH 14 EB 2 45 Major App3: CSAH 14 WB - 2 OPERATOR. MAR 40-. Minor App2:. TH _101: NB -2 40 -. Minor App4: TH 101 SB 2 _ 0.70 FACTOR USED? YES - - -- - _ - - - - - - - POPULATION < 10,000? No EXISTING SIGNAL? No I - THRESHOLDS 1A/18: 420/630 140RO 140f70 HOUR MAJOR APP.1 —7-6— MAJOR APP.3 TOTAL 1+3 MAJOR 1AAB MINOR APP.2 MINOR 2 I IA11B MINOR APP.4 MINOR 4 tA/1B MET SAME IA11B 0:00 - 1:00 25 = 31 / 24 ;: / 44 1:00 - 2:00 6 9 ' -' 15 / 10 / 16 2:00 - 3:00 7 ' 11 `- 18 / 14 '. / 23 3:00-4:00M147, '6, - 15 4:00 - 5:006 - 55 / 14 / 8 5:00 - 6:00 ,13• =" 243 / 41 - :,. / 13 6:00 - 7:00" '100 ;c 743 X/X ' 225 - /X 38 - / /X 7:00 -8:00" '227 �_ 723 X/X 259 --"- X/X -i. 173 1 X!X X/X 8:00 -9:00 206' 471 X/ 297' X/X 262 =; X/X X/ 9:00 - 10:00 129 < 251 / 200 X/X ;- , 157 f:` X/X / 10:00 - 11:00 13i> 275 / 118 -.rr /X -- 121 �- /X / 11:00 - 12:00A77 ': 324 / 112"" /X 118 /X / 12:00 - 13:00 143 323 112 .. !X 146 / 13:00-14:00 132 359 130 /X 142 X/X / 14:0015:00 179 425 X/ 121 /X 137 /X / 15001600 211- 632 X/X '200 X/X 265 X/X 16:00 -17:00 220 852 X/X ,180 X/X 329 X/X 7:0018.00 772 904 X/X 224 X/X 364- X/X 18:00 -1900 129 557 X/ ,193 X/X 272 X/X X/ 309 136 /X .X/X 149 X/X /19:0 20:00 72100 791915 274 / -'80 /X 104 :- /X / 21:00-22:00 39 182' 221 1 ;65- / 67 / 22:00 -23:00 1 _-129- 150 / 55. / 54 / / 23:00-24:00 12 4fi'' 58 . 1 37.- ! 36 / 1 Met (Hr) Required (Hr) Warrant 1A 6 8 Warrant 1B 5 8 Warrant 2 7 4 Warrant 3 3 1 Warrant 7 9 R Not satisfied Not satisfied Satisfied Satisfied Satisfied, check accident record LOCATION: CSAH 14 AT TH 101 COUNTY: CARVER REF. POINT: 10.261 DATE: 12/1712001 OPERATOR MAR 0.70 FACTOR USED? YES POPULATION < 10,000? No EXISTING SIGNAL ? No 700 E 600 j a 500 r� x� 400 m o 300 dL a a 200 0 c :E 100 Speed Approach Description Lanes 45 Major Appl: CSAH 14 EB 2 45 Major App3: CSAH 14 WB 2 40 Minor App2: TH 101 NB 2 40 Minor App4: TH 101 SB 2 Warrant 2, Four-hour Volumes — — Warrant 3, Peak -hour Volumes Actual Hourly Count 200 400 600 800 1D00 1200 1400 1600 1800 Major Street -Total of Both Approaches - VPH Figure 1. Four Hour and Peak Hour Warrant Analysis Note: For data points outside the graph range, Check the minor street volume against the lower thresholds Major 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 16M 1700 1800 Warrant Criteria Warrant 2, 1 Warrant 3, 420 350 500 285 435 230 370 175 315 135 260 103 215 80 175 80 140 80 115 Bo 100 80 100 80 too 80 100 80 100 80 100 80 100 Actual Hourly Count Major Actual Hourly Count 31 44 15 15 18 23 15 7 55 14 243 41 743 125 723 259 471 297 251 200 275 121 324 118 323 146 359 142 425 137 632 265 852 329 904 354 557 272 309 149 274 104 221 67 150 55 58 37 Mn/DOf 2942 trey 9-II-921 Collision Diagram Minnesota Department of Transportation Location: C.S. 1009 TH 101 0 Pioneer Tr M.P. 10,261 Time Period: 1/O1/99 - 12/31/99 Date: 11/15/01 Prepared By: J. Dcihlke T North 12/30/99 U5) C D No. of Crashes Fatal= 0 A Injury= 0 B Injury= 3 C Injury= 0 Injury Total= 3 Prcoerty Damage= 4 Total Crashes= 7 B / 7/99 (071 C-D B 6/07/99 L-C-0 7 9/14/99 (14) L-R-W 9/24/99 (18) -C-D KCE-3 Motor Vehicle Backing Up Details (1] (21 -asc) Motor Vehicle Out of Control Unclear (3) —j Motor Vehicle Ahead Pedestrian L igh t: Weather[ Surface: ❑ Fixed Object O 3S Bicycle/Moped L= Daylight (1) C= Clem or Cloudy I I or 2) O= Dry (1) ON= Dorn (2) R- Rain (3) ■- Net (2) Fatal Crash � Motorcycle Du= Dusk (3) S= Snow or Sleet 14 Or 5) S= Snow or Ice (3 or 41 ® A D1= Dark, Lighted (4) F= Fog, Smog, Sird/Dus l(7 M= Mundy Injury Crash Rear End Do- Dark, Lights Oft 151 8= Blowing Smd/Q[at (7) s ( Db= Debris l6) Q B Injury Crash Property Damage D= Dark, Unlighted (6) W= Severe Crosswinds Ia) 0= Oily (7) © C Injury N1' X= Unknown (991 X= Other orUnknown (99) X= Other orUnknown 199) Crash Right -Angle o Property Dangge Crash 8 Injury 0', n,•,aeps-ce venla a nlary tome) -[Tine ,Rs>7—lL lane .ease ar.ac.l X 1 Yenicia In Vann Type Mn/DOT 2942 (rev 9-II-92) Collision Diagram Minnesota Department of Transportation Location: C.S. loog MNTH 101 to PTON FR TRATI R P 10+00 61 Time Period: 1/01/00 - 12/31/00 -Dote: 11/15/01 No. of Crashes Prepared By: J. Dahlke Fatal = 0 A Injury= 0 B Injury= 0 _ C Injury= p O Injury Total= 0 North = Property Damage= 3 �- Z Total Crashes= 3 5/24/00 ( 0) -C-D QK ) Motor Vehicle Backing Up Details ()) vuoi Motor Vehicle Out of Control Unclear (2) (31 ---� Motor Vehicle Ahead a L • ht: 0 Fixed Object 411 Fatal Crash 0 C 0 A Injury Crash B Injury Crash Z Pedestrian 9 Bicycle/Moped L= Daylight (1) M Motorcycle ON= Dow (2) Du= Dusk (3) DI= Dark. Lighted l41 Rear End Do= Dark. Lights off is Property DODage D:= Dark. Unlighted (6) x• Ib*. Iaa) C Injury Crash a Right Angle Property Oamge Crash 8 Injury PIONEER TRAIL 1/17/00 (OS) L-C-W Weather: C- Cleo' or Cloudy ( I or 2) R- Rain (3) S= Snow or Sleet 1 4 or 51 F- Fog, Smog. Spoke (6) 8- Blowing Said/Dust (7) N=.Severe Crosswinds (a) X= Other or Unk:JowJ 199) 6/2 /00 (6) L-C-0 Surface: D- Dry ( 1) ■- let (2) S= SnOw or Ice (3 or 4) M= Middy (5) Db= Debris (6) D= Oily (7) X = Other or Unknown (99 ) otD IS)•NwOC of YMI[)e In)ury :Dote)—(Tlze lhrzlJ—Clippi-Mother-$ta}aneJ VWICIe In Craw, (X) / 1 iv.w /• Mn/DOT 2942 (rev 9-II-92) Collision Diagram Minnesota Department of Transportation Location: ( S 1009 MNTH 101 to PTONFFR TRATI R P 10+00 261 Time Period: 1/01/01 - 12/31/01 _Date: 05/21/02 No. of Crashes Prepared By: J. Dahlke Fatal= 0 A Injury= 0 B Injury= O _ C Injury= I O Injury Total= I North = Property Damage- 3 Z Total Crashes= 4 PIONEER TRAIL � 11/OB/01 (16> DU-C-D / 4/27/01 05) L-C D t3) r 28/01 (IS) L-C-O 2/06/0 (18) DU-C-D KEY NOTES C—) Motor Vehicle Backing up Details (I] ALL WAY STOP 121 -aaa� Motor Vehicle Out of Control Unclear 131 (3] —) Motor Vehicle Mead Z Pedestrian L ight: Weather: Surface: B [I Fixed Object � BIc cue Y /Moped L= Daylight (t) C= Dear ar Cloudy (tar z) D= Dry (1) M Motorcycle ON= Darn (2) R= Rain (3) 1= Met (2) Fatal Crash � Du Dusk 13) S= Snow or Sleet (4 or 5) S= Snow ar Ice (3 or 4 ) (D A Injury Crash B Injury Crash - Rear End Proper'ty. Dannge D)= Dark, Lighted (4) Do- Dark, Lights Off IS) D= Dark, Unlighted t6) F= Fog, Smog, Smoke (6) B= Blowing SaWDurt IT) N= Severe Crosswinds (8) M= Middy (5) Db= Debris (6) 0- Oily IT) © p C Injury Crash B Property Damage Crash Right Angle B Injury._ _ X- Unknown (99) X- Other or Unknown (99) X= Other or Unknown (99) o.w AX1.H osaf m (X) venmi. l-. mmen-rTT= 1Mmn-uwnr-w .ter-s ) VMWi m rasa ,fit Tvn. /r a1/uVl 2942 trev 9-II-921 Collision Diagram Minnesota Department of Transportation Location: C-S, 1009 MNTH 101 95 PIONEER TRATI R P 10+00 261 Time Period: 2002 Date: 9/15/03 No. of Crashes Prepared By: MPK Fatal= 0 A Injury= 0 B Injury= 0 _ C Injury= p Injury Total= 0 North = Property Damage= 5 H Total Crashes= 5 Z M PIONEER TRAIL &-9/_Z5�/02051-R-W 1/02/02 (14) -C D _1/17/02 (07) 1C--D / REE Motor Vehicle Backing Lip -Wrrj Motor Vehicle out of Control Details Unc Iea' [l] ALL WAY STOP [21 (3) ---� Motor Vehicle Ahead � Pedestrian L ightx Weather: Surface: R 316 El Fixed Crash 4 Fatal Crash FF Bicycle/Moped Motorcycle L- Daylight (1) DN= Down 12) Dun Dusk (3) C= Clear or Cloudy 11 or 2) R= Rain (3) S= Snow a Sleet l o ar 51 0= Dry (1) W= Bet (2) S= Snow or Ice (3 or 4 ) QQ A Injury Crash _ � B Injury Crash Rear End Property Dagge DI= Dark. Lighted (41 Oo= Dark. lights Off (5) On Dark. Unlighted (6) F= Fog. Slog. Saoke (6) On Blowing Said/Dust (7) W= Severe Crosswinds (s) Y= u,ddy (5) Db= Debris (6) On Oily (7) © o C Injury Crash a Property Damge Crash Right Angle B Injury _ X=Unknown (991 X= Other or Unknown (99) X= Other of Unknown 199) owner rs1-a.mer of Ym Icle .niwy bate:-171M 1.5,1-1119ht-weatnr-Surfinel vr::elex in tram ( X ) 11 T➢De 4 Name and Address of Local Government Unit: City of Chanhassen, 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Name of Applicant: Carver County Project Name: T.H.101 & C.S.A.H 101 Intersection Improvements Application Number. 05-07 Type of Application (check one): ❑ Exemption Decision ❑ No Loss Decision ® Replacement Plan Decision ❑ Banking Plan Decision ❑ Wetland Type/Boundary Decision Date of Decision: February 28, 2005 Check One: ® Approved ❑ Approved with conditions (see note on page 2 regarding use of wetland banking credits) ❑ Denied Summary of Project/Decision (indicate exemption number per MN Rule 8420.0122, if applicable): Project proposal is for road improvements for the T.H. 101 and C.S.A.H. 14 intersection. hprovements include the creation of left and right turn lanes on all approach lanes without a raised median installation of a new signal with pedestrian indicators, construction of an 8 foot wide bituminous shoulder. An additional 1.S gravel shoulder will be installed on the west leg of C.S.A.H 14. Drainage is proposed to be carried in ditches along the roadway. Impacts to wetlands includes filling .11 acres to a type 3 wetland and .01 acres to a type 2 wetland for additional right of way needed for proiect. Project proposes to replace filled wetland activities through BWSR Road Replacement Program banking, List of Addressees: Landowner: Carver County 11360 Highway 212 West, PO Box 300, Cologne, MN 55322-0300 Members of Technical Evaluation Panel: Mr. Brad Wozney, Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Natasha DeVoe, Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Mr. Chip Hentges, Carver Soil and Water Conservation District -Page 1 of 2 CC l0land14 WCA decision2.doc 9/16/04 4 Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization (If Applicable): Mr. Bob Obermeyer, Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District Department of Natural Resources Regional Office Ms. Julie Ekman, Area Hydrologist DNR Wetlands Coordinator Ecological Services Station 500 Layfayette Road, Box 25- St. Paul, MN 55155 Corp of Engineers Project Manager @ Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District ATTN: CO-R, 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1638 Individual members of the public who requested a copy, summary only You are hereby notified that the decision of the Local Government Unit on the above - referenced application was made on the date stated above. A copy of the Local Government Unit's Findings and Conclusions is attached. Pursuant to Minn. R. 8420.0250 any appeal of the decision must be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice. NOTE: Approval of Wetland Replacement Plan Applications involving the use of wetland banking credits is conditional upon withdrawal of the appropriate credits from the state wetland bank. No wetland impacts may commence until the applicant receives a copy of the fully signed and executed "Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits," signed by the BWSR wetland bank administrator certifying that the wetland bank credits have been debited. THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. LOC UNIT March 8, 2005 Jature Date Lori Haak Chanhassen Water Resources Coordinator Name and Title - Page 2of2 CC 101and14 WCA decision2.doc 9/16/04 4 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard • P.O. Box 147 • Chanhassen, MN 55317 Name of Applicant: Carver County Public Works Project Location: Intersection of C.S.A.H. 14 (Pioneer Trail) and T.H. 101 Type of Application (check one): ❑ Delineation Decision ❑ Exemption Decision ❑ No Loss Decision 0 Replacement Plan Decision ❑ Banking Plan Decision Date of Decision: February 28, 2005 Findings and Conclusions On December 29, 2004 the applicant submitted the plan for the proposed intersection improvements that will impact a total of .12 acres of wetland. The proposed wetland impacts will be mitigated through the BWSR Road Replacement Program. The wetland alterations are considered unavoidable and have been minimized to ensure public safety and wetland protection. The City Council approved a Wetland Alteration Permit on February 28, 2004 subject to the following conditions: 1. If not addressed in the condemnation proceedings, the applicant shall request the City grant a conservation easement release prior to clearing and grubbing the site. 2. The applicant shall work with the property owners to obtain additional right-of- way prior to proceeding with the project. 3. All wetland impacts shall be mitigated through the BWSR Road Replacement Program in accordance with State law. 4. Proposed erosion control shall be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Type 11 silt fence shall be used adjacent to the existing wetlands. Silt fence shall be installed between wetland impact areas and the remaining wetland. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed at the limits of tree removal. Ga V7 A Erosion control blankets shall be installed in all areas with a steep slope of 3:1 and an elevation drop of eight feet or greater. All exposed soil areas should have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning or soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. 9. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit) and comply with their conditions of approval. CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: -- Title: Water Resources Coordinator Date: March 8, 2005 Name and Address of Local Government Unit: City of Chanhassen, 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Name of Applicant: Carver County Project Name: T.H.101 & C.S.A.H 101 Intersection Improvements Application Number: 050507 Type of Application (check one): ❑ Exemption Decision ❑ No Loss Decision ® Replacement Plan Decision ❑ Banking Plan Decision ❑ Wetland TypeBoundary Decision Date of Decision: February 28, 2005 Check One: ® Approved ❑ Approved with conditions (see note on page 2 regarding use of wetland banking credits) ❑ Denied Summary of Project/Decision (indicate exemption number per MN Rule 8420.0122, if applicable): Project proposal is for road improvements for the T.H. 101 and C.S.A.H. 14 intersection. improvements include the creation of left andright turn lanes on all approach lanes without a raised median, installation of a new signal with pedestrian indicators, construction of an 8 foot wide bituminous shoulder. An additional 1.5' gravel shoulder will be installed on the west leg of C.S.A.H 14. Drainage is proposed to be carried in ditches along the roadway. Impacts to wetlands includes filling .I I acres to a type 3 wetland and .01 acres to a type 2 wetland for additional right of way needed for project. Project proposes to replace filled wetland activities through BWSR Road Replacement Program banking List of Addressees: Landowner: Carver County 11360 Highway 212 West, PO Box 300, Cologne, MN 55322-0300 Members of Technical Evaluation Panel: Mr. Brad Wozney, Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Natasha DeVoe, Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Mr. Chip Hentges, Carver Soil and Water Conservation District -Page I of 2 CC l0land14 WCA decision2.doc 9/16104 Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization (If Applicable): Mr. Bob Obermeyer, Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District Department of Natural Resources Regional Office Ms. Julie Ekman, Area Hydrologist DNR Wetlands Coordinator Ecological Services Station 500 Layfayette Road, Box 25 St. Paul, MN 55155 Corp of Engineers Project Manager @ Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District ATTN: CO-R, 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1638 Individual members of the public who requested a copy, summary only You are hereby notified that the decision of the Local Government Unit on the above - referenced application was made on the date stated above. A copy of the Local Government Unit's Findings and Conclusions is attached. Pursuant to Minn. R. 8420.0250 any appeal of the decision must be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice. NOTE: Approval of Wetland Replacement Plan Applications involving the use of wetland banking credits is conditional upon withdrawal of the appropriate credits from the state wetland bank. No wetland impacts may commence until the applicant receives a copy of the fully signed and executed "Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits," signed by the BWSR wetland bank administrator certifying that the wetland bank credits have been debited. THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. LOCA VE QMEUNIT March 8, 2005 Si ature Date Lori Haak Chanhassen Water Resources Coordinator Name and Title -Page 2 of 2 CC 101andl4WCAdecision2.doc 9/16104 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard • P.O. Box 147 • Chanhassen, MN 55317 Name of Applicant: Carver County Public Works Project Location: Intersection of C.S.A.H. 14 (Pioneer Trail) and T.H. 101 Type of Application (check one): ❑ Delineation Decision ❑ Exemption Decision ❑ No Loss Decision 0 Replacement Plan Decision ❑ Banking Plan Decision Date of Decision: February 28, 2005 Findings and Conclusions On December 29, 2004 the applicant submitted the plan for the proposed intersection improvements that will impact a total of .12 acres of wetland. The proposed wetland impacts will be mitigated through the BWSR Road Replacement Program. The wetland alterations are considered unavoidable and have been minimized to ensure public safety and wetland protection. The City Council approved a Wetland Alteration Permit on February 28, 2004 subject to the following conditions: If not addressed in the condemnation proceedings, the applicant shall request the City grant a conservation easement release prior to clearing and grubbing the site. 2. The applicant shall work with the property owners to obtain additional right-of- way prior to proceeding with the project. 3. All wetland impacts shall be mitigated through the BWSR Road Replacement Program in accordance with State law. 4. Proposed erosion control shall be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Type II silt fence shall be used adjacent to the existing wetlands. Silt fence shall be installed between wetland impact areas and the remaining wetland. 5. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed at the limits of tree removal. RE 7 91 Erosion control blankets shall be installed in all areas with a steep slope of 3:1 and an elevation drop of eight feet or greater. All exposed soil areas should have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Street cleaning or soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. 9. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase H Construction Permit) and comply with their conditions of approval. CrrY OF CHANHASSEN By: Title: Water Resources Coordinator Date: March 8, 2005 Haak, Lori From: Brad Wozney [brad.wozney@bwsr.state.mn.us] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 2:10 PM To: Haak, Lori Subject: 101 & CSAH 14 Hi Lori, Just a quick reminder that you'll need to send a complete packet including plans and notice of decision once the decision has been made (assuming you are doing the administration and noticing for the hwy dept on this project) to Natasha DeVoe, BWSR, along with myself. I spoke with Bill Weckman on the phone on Friday and he answered the few questions I had. I have no further issues with this one. Thanks, Brad 1 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Web Site: http//www.rileypurgatorybluffcreek.org February 2, 2005 Mr. Martin Korthank Minnesota Department of Transportation 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 Legal Advisor "bsbach & Haik 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4320 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612 333-7400 Fax: 612 333-6959 Engineering Advisor. Barr Engineering 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 952 832-2600 Fax: 952 832-2601 Communication Lexicon Communications Consultant: 15246 65th Place North Maple Grove, MN 55311 763-557-5244 - Re: Permit #2005-03: T.H.101 and Pioneer Trail Intersection Reconstruction: Chanhassen Dear Mr. Korthank: The Board of Managers of the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District has reviewed the plans and grading and land alteration permit application as submitted to the District for the T.H. 101 and Pioneer Trail intersection reconstruction in Chanhassen. The Managers approve of the grading and land alteration permit subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions as outlined in the attached General Provisions are applicable. If you have any questions regarding the conditions of the District's permit, please call us at 952-832-2600. Sincerely, obert C. Obermey BARR ENGINEERING CO. Engineers for the District by the Nard of Managers JRGAi TRY -BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Date: c: Paul Haik Howard Pe Lori Haak ::0DMA\PCDOCS\DOCS7245326V President Board of Managers Howard Peterson Perry Forster Conrad Fiskness Philip Wright Susan Scribner Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Web Site: hftp//www.dleypurgatorybluffcreek.org February 2, 2005 Legal Advisor. Krebsbach & Haik 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4320 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612 333-7400 Fax: 612 333-6959 Engineering Advisor: Barr Engineering 4700 west 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 952 832-2600 Fax: 952 832-2601 Communication Lexicon Communications Consultant: 15246 65th Place North Maple Grove, MN 55311 763-557-5244 Mr. Todd Sinning Plowshares Development LLC 1851 Lake Drive West, Suite 550 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Permit #2005-05: Pinehurst: Chanhassen Dear Mr. Simning: The Board of Managers of the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District has reviewed the plans and grading and land alteration permit application as submitted to the District for the proposed Pinehurst development to be located west of Galpin Boulevard, County Road 117, and north of Lake Lucy Road in Chanhassen. The Managers approve of the grading and land alteration permit subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions as outlined in the attached General Provisions are applicable. 2. The District will require that restrictive covenants be placed on the title to Lots 20 through 23 and Lot 27, Block 1 stating that the lowest floor elevation must be set at or above Elevation 1030 MSL which is 2 feet above the 100 year frequency flood elevation of the onsite stormwater management basin calculated by Westwood Professional Services. 3. If the existing structures on the site to be razed are served by private domestic water supply wells, the wells must be abandoned in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Minnesota Department of Health criteria. A copy of the well abandonment certification must be submitted to the District's legal advisor otherwise the permitter: must certify to the District in writing that no private domestic water supply wells are located on the property. 4. The District will require that the rock construction entrance be placed a minimum 50 feet into the site from Galpin Boulevard. A bituminous mat must be constructed between the rock dike and Galpin Boulevard. The bituminous mat will provide an area to be swept/cleaned thereby minimizing material from being tracked onto Galpin Boulevard. 5. In accordance with the District's steep slope criteria, roof and/or rear yard runoff from Lots 14-16, Block 1 must be either conveyed back to the front of the lot, street, or directed to a conveyance system rather than discharging (flowing) down the steep slope. A copy of the plan showing how this runoff' is to be handled must be submitted to the District's engineering advisor for review and approval. If you have any questions regarding the conditions of the District's permit, please call us at 952-832-2600. mcerely, ob t C. Obermeyer BARR ENGINE G CO. Engineers for the District Appro ed by the BoRd of Managers E`-PURGA-BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT President Date: c: Paul Haik Howard Peterson Lori Haak Curtis Neft Board of Man a ers 9 ::ODMA\PCDOCS\DOCS1245328U Howard Peterson Perry Forster Conrad Fiskness Philip Wright Susan Scribner Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Web Site: http//www.rileypurgatorybluffcreek.org February 2, 2005 Mr. John Kohler Semper Development Ltd. 821 Marquette Avenue, Suite 600 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: Permit #2005-04: Walgreen's: Chanhassen Dear Mr. Kohler: Legal Advisor. Krebsbach & Haik 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 4320 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612 333-7400 Fax: 612 333-6959 Engineering Advisor: Barr Engineering 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 952 832-2600 Fax: 952 832-2601 Communication Lexicon Communications Consultant: 15246 65th Place North Maple Grove, MN 55311 763-557-5244 The Board of Managers of the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District has reviewed the plans and grading and land alteration permit application as submitted to the District for the construction of a new Walgreen's to be located east of Market Boulevard, north of West 79th Street, and south of the Soo Line Railroad in Chanhassen. The Managers approve of the grading and land alteration permit subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions as outlined in the attached General Provisions are applicable. 2. If the existing structure on the site to be razed is served by private domestic water supply well, the well must be abandoned in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Minnesota Department of Health criteria. A copy of the well abandonment certification must be submitted to the District's legal advisor otherwise the permittee must certify to the District in writing that no private domestic water supply wells are located on the property. 3. The District will require that the rock construction entrances be placed a minimum of 25 feet into the site from Market Place Boulevard and West 79 h Street. A bituminous mat must be constructed between the rock dike and the roadways. The bituminous mat will provide an area to be swept/cleaned thereby minimizing material from being tracked onto the roadways. If you have any questions regarding the conditions of the District's permit, please call us at 952-832-2600. Sincerely, obert C. Obermeyer BARR ENGINEERING CO. Engineers for the District 'ed by the B d of Managers -PURGY-B V CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT / /V Prrcidr t Date: c: Paul Haik Howard Peterson Lori Haak / ::ODMA\PCDOCS\DOCS\245327\1 Board of Managers Howard Peterson Perry Forster Conrad Fiskness Philip Wright Susan Scribner r. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION APPLICANT: e0.rVCr ludq uy3iic WnirkS ADDRESS: 11361) HWy, ZI��77ZTW %lhq Sat Ml ' 5532Z TELEPHONE (Day Time) R 52- y to (e -15200 OWNER: l dryer Lwyl,i C. Works ADDRESS:_y�3 D bM i� C�p�oavlt° I. Mtn 55322- TELEPHONE: 1 GJ Z"y (plp' Sat S Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Interim Use Permit Variance Non -conforming Use Permit X Wetland Alteration Permit Planned Unit Development* Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Notification Sign Site Plan Review* X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** - $50 CUP/SPRNACNARNVAP/Metes & Bounds - $400�21Minor SUB Subdivision* TOTAL FEE $,�Jy Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application -OR- the City can provide this list (Carver County properties only) for an additional fee to be invoiced to the applicant. CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this box F1 DEC 2 9 2004 Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT *Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/2" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. *Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. j 4 PROJECT NAME: S.P 1001 — LOCATION: Znkersecfio n oV C.-S.A.H. N and 7A , 101 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: F.T.P. 250253300 s 250253) 0 TOTAL ACREAGE: 0.11 A M 5 0� We+i an d I maa c+e d WETLANDS PRESENT: X YES NO PRESENT ZONING REQUESTED ZONING: AZ I �_ I PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Low IkxtSrl y Fi7 esldeYu�lci,) REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: Low De► s:]fj Resid&&al REASON FOR REQUEST: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of 4plicant Date Signature of Fee Owner Application Received on Fee Paid Date Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Thursday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. C.'Documents and Settings\jwenko\Local Settings\Temporary Intemet Files\01-K90eve1opment Review Application.DOC NA-026620-03C (V.2.02for NIS WORD) 09/0I/04 Mir.-nesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND LINEAR UTILITY PROJECTS LOCAL AND STATE: Application for Local Government Unit approval Pursuant to Minnesota Wetlands Cons ct (WCA) Project Specific Report and Notification for Work on Existing Public Roads Pursuant to 0 CA Application for Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Permit to Work in Public Application for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Certi attan FEDERAL: A lication for the D arthuent of the Arm Permit 33 CFR 325) see Pa e 5 Use this form to notify and apply for authorization of any proposed water/wetland project affecting lakes, rivers, streams or wetlands that may fall within the jurisdiction of 1) the appropriate Local Government Unit (LGU), 2) the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), or 3) the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). If a 401 certification is required from the-Mumesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the COE will forward this application to the MPCA for processing. You do not need to send this application to the WCA. This application packet includes the following: PART I: STANDARD APPLICATION. Full out (Pages 1-4) and submit along with the required attachments. Instructions for completing Part I are attached. APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT. Generally, in addition to state and local authorization, projects in wetland or water areas also require Federal authorization from the Corps of Engineers (COE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. To apply to the COE using this application packet, complete the modified one page Federal application form found on Page 5, and mail it to the COE along with a copy of the local/state application. NOTE CONCERNING COE JURISDICTION: You do not need to notify or obtain further authorization from COE if all proposed work is covered by either a COE Section 404 non -reporting General Permit or a Clean Water Act Section 404 exemption, or if no work is in an area subject to COE jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Contact the COE if you have questions. A separate form (PART 11: PUBLIC ROAD MAINTENANCE SHORT FORM NOTICE) is available for use for existing public road maintenance projects only if they qualify as either. (1) Minor or emergency work impacting less than 10,000 square feet of wetlands subject to the WCA; OR (2) Minor or emergency work impacting less than 10,000 square feet of certain DNR Public Water Wetlands (i.e, those not assigned a shoreland classification, not classified as lacustrine wetlands or deepwater habitats, or not having state or federal land ownership); OR ` (3) Work impacting DNR Public Water Wetlands and wetland areas of DNR Public Water basins when the DNR has received a copy of the Public Road Maintenance Short Form Notice and has waived the requirement for a DNR Public Water Work Permit to either the LGU responsible for WCA or the public road authority responsible for reporting wetland impacts to the Board of Water and Soil Resources; OR (4) Work involving existing public road crossings of DNR Public Waters. If your project qualifies for this category, use this separate Public Road Maintenance Short Form Notice. See the instructions accompanying this Form Notice. - INSTRUCTIONS (Introduction and hnstructions) assist with completion and mailing of these applications. CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 2 9 2004 Public Transportation and Utility Projects Introduction, Page I CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Before beginning work on your project, you must receive all required approvals from the appropriate LGU, the DNR and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). If you have not received a reply after 45 days, or if you wish to confirm the status of your application at any time, contact the agencies directly (see Instructions, Page 3). Proceeding with work before all required authorizations are obtained may result in fines or other penalties, and may_include a. requirement to restore the project site to original condition. If you have questions or need assistance with filling out this application, contact your LGU, your DNR Waters Area hydrologist, or your COE regulatory field office (see Instructions, Page 3). Note: If you believe that your project may be subject to Watershed. District Regulations, local Planning and Zoning jurisdiction, or any other locally implemented or enacted controls beside those of your LGU, contact the appropriate Of ce(s) directly in addition to your LGU, the DNR, and the COE. For more information, contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) or refer to www.bwsr.state.mn.us. A QUICK LOOK AT THE PROJECT APPLICATION PROCESS Forms can be downloaded from the BWSR or DNR web sites and filled out using Microsoft Word. Your input will be restricted to fill-in fields where users printed document. can enter text or check boxes. These areas appear gray on the screen, but not on the Send copies of your completed application forms to your LGU, area DNR office, and your COE regulatory office. LOCAL government road projects that qualify for replacement of wetland impacts via the BWSR Road Replacement Program must also send a copy to the BWSR Wetland Banking Administrator (See Instructions, Page 3). When your application is considered complete and the appropriate fees have been received (if requested by -the regulating agencies) it will be distributed for review and comment and you will be notified if it is accepted as proposed, approved with changes or conditions, withdrawn, or denied. You will also be informed of any appeal rights relating to the decision. WEB SITES Refer to the following web sites for more information regarding regulations of water and wetlands: BWSR: www.bwsr.state.mn.us Corps St. Paul District: www.mvp.usace.army.mil MR: www.dnr.state.mn.us MPCA: www.pca.state.mn.us For information on the appeals process, contact the appropriate agency (See Instructions, Page 3) Public Transportation and Utility Projects Introduction, Page 2 NA-026620-03C (V2.01 for MS WORD) 02/18/03 Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for WaterMetland Projects PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND LINEAR UTILITY PROJECTS PART I - STANDARD APPLICATION For Internal Use Only Application No, Field Office Code Date Initial Application Received Date Initial Application Deemed Complete INY: F "See HELP" for important additional information and assistance in Instructions, Pages 3 — 5 IS THIS AN ORIGINAL OR AMENDED NOTICE? (check one) This is an original notice & dated 12/15/04 This is an amended notice ❑, dated I. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION: Name of applicant: Carver County Contact person (name and title): Bill Weckman, Assistant County Engineer Complete mailing address: Carver Coutty Public Works, 11360 Highway 212 West, PO Box 300, Cologne, MN 55322-0300 Business phone: f2i2l 466-5200 Fax: (952) 466-5223 a -mail: bweckman0co.carver run us 2. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION (See HELP 2): Also attach PROJECT LOCATIONMAP. S.P. 1009-14 Intersection of T.H. 101 & C.S.A.H. 14 (See Attached Project Memo for Project Location Map) 3. LAND USE: Describe existing land use in project area. (See HELP 3) (pick one from the list) Housing, highways and associated right-of-ways, farmsteads/agricultural 4. PROJECT CATEGORY (check all that apply): ® Repair rehabilitation, reconstruction or replacement of existing roads that impact wetlands (including wetland areas of DNR Public Waters). If so, indicate size of impact (check one). ® Less than 10,000 square feet of wetlands (see HELP 4). ❑ Greater than 10,000 square feet of wetlands. ❑ New road or modification of an existing road solely to increase traffic capacity impacting any amount of wetland area River, lake or stream impact (excluding wetland areas of DNR Public Waters). ❑ Placement, maintenance or repair of linear utility projects. 5. PROPOSED TIlAELINE: Approximate project start date: 5/05105 Projected end date:09/01/05 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Check all that apply. Also include a detailed overhead view of your plan that clearly depicts the work to be undertaken. See What To Include on Plans (Instructions, Page 4) ❑ Guardrail improvement ❑ Slope flattening ❑ Guardrail improvement with slope flattening ® Turn lane: improvement of existing or new construction ® Resurfacing ❑ Bridge work: repair ® Culvert work; repair, extension or replacement ❑ Bridge work: replacement ❑ Stream diversion ❑ Reconstruction (existing roads) ❑ Shoulder work: repair widening ❑ Additional lanes solely for traffic capacity - El Shoulder widening with ditch grading ❑ New road construction ® Other ❑ Linear utility Projects 7. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: FUNDING SOURCES (%): Federal 0"/n State 1000/6 Local 0% 8. SEQUENCING CONSIDERATIONS: What alternatives to this proposed project have you considered that could have avoided or ininimid impacts to wetlands or water? For new construction only - list at least two alternatives (one of which may be "no buil&' or "do nothing"), and explain why you chose to pursue the option described in this application over these alternatives. (If space below is not adequate, attach separate sheet labeled SEQUENCDVG CONSIDERATIONS) (See Attached Project Memo pages 2 & 3) Public Transportation and Utility Projects, Page I 9A. IMPACT SUMMARY: Impacts to lakes and watercourses only - indicate total amount (in acres or square feet) of water body area(s) to be filled, drained, inundated, or excavated. For watercourses indicate length of stream or river affected (in linear feet). (See HELP 9A & 9B) Location of Impact Section, Twp, Range County Name and Watershed No. Public Waters Indicate name And ID Number For lakes indicate area of impact in acres For watercourse impacts indicate length of impact in linear feet AFFiRMATrnN G.,. .. vv.... r. u• ,y,t,pl U. ' I am applying for state and local authorization to conduct the work described in this application. I am familiar with the information contained in this application. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information in this application is true, complete and accurate. I possess the authority to undertake the work described, or I am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant IF your project will impact ONLY DNR Public Waters, proceed directly to the Applicant Signature Block on Page 4. 9B. IMPACT SUMMARY: For imnaetc to wnttandc ..,.t.,. ID of Wetland Basin Impacted Watershed Name or No. County Section, W Twp, Range Wetland Type Predominant Vegetation Size of Wetland Impact Size of Wetland Basin Wetland I Bluff Cree Carver County25T116N R23W 3 grasses, sedges 0.11 ac 10.5 ac Wetland Bluff Cree Carver County ty 25T116N R23W 2 grasses, bulbushes 0.01 ac 10.5 ac TOTALS OF AREA (S) IIvIPACTFI) FnR FAPP Ur TT Aun •rvnr:. Type 1 Type 1L Type 2 Type 3 _ Type 4 u Type 5y Type 6 Type 7 Type 8 Type R 0.01 ac 0.11 ac 9C. Are any of these impact sites within 1000 feet of a lake or 300 feet of a river? ® No E]Yes. If YES, please explain. 10. TYPE and AMOUNT OF FILL MATERIAL: e.g., rock, sand, clay or concrete (indicate amount of cubic yards.) Suitable fill material will he used with the total fill material covering approximately 5440 square feet. The final amount in cubic yards is yet to be determined. 11. ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: For projects that require a COE standard individual permit, attach a list of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS that includes complete names and mailing addresses of adjacent property owners whose property also adjoins the wetland or water body where the work is being proposed. 12. PORTION OF WORK ALREADY COMPLETED: Is any portion of the work already completed? ®No El If YES, attach DESCRIPTION OF WORK COMPLETED and provide permit numbers if applicable. 13. STATUS OF OTHER APPROVALS: Attach STATUS OF OTHER APPROVALS LIST, include any other permits, reviews, or approvals related to this proposed project that are either pending, or have already been approved or denied. (See HELP 13) Public Transportation and Utility Projects, Page 2 STATE EAW AND EIS REQUIREMENTS: Are state Environmental Assessment Worksheets or Environmental Impact 'Statements required for this project? (see HELP 13.) ® not required ❑ yes, indicate status below ARCHEOLOGICAL OR CULTURAL RESOURCES DETERMINATIONS: Are you aware of any archeological or cultural resource determinations or surveys completed concerning the project or replacement site that are already completed or in process by the State Historical Society Preservation Office (SHPO) or others? ❑No ®Yes. If YES, please explain below or attach a copy of any determinations or surveys. If NO, and if project will use federal or state -aid funds, contact SHPO for determination. 14. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Are you aware of any special considerations that apply directly or indirectly to either the impact sites(s) or the replacement sites(s)? (Examples: the presence of endangered species, special fish and wildlife resources, sensitive surface waters, calcareous fens, or waste disposal sites.) (See HELP 14) ® Not aware of any special considerations ❑ Yes, attach a list of SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS and include brief descriptions of each consideration listed 15. OPT -SITE MITIGATION CONSIDERATIONS. List any important site -specific wetland functions and describe options considered for mitigation of these functions onsite. 16. HOW WILL PROPOSED REPLACEMENT BE ACCOMPLISHED: Wetland Banking only? ❑No NYes (if Yes, proceed to Question 17) Project -specific replacement only? ❑No ❑Yes (if YES, check all that apply below and proceed to Question 19) Project -specific replacement and Wetland Banking? ❑No ❑Yes (If Yes, check all that apply below, and proceed to Questions 18 and 19) For projects involving any project -specific replacement Part A: The replacement wetland (affirm all statements): Was not previously restored or created under a prior approval replacement plan or permit; AND Was not drained or filed under an exemption during the previous 10 years, AND Was not restored with financial assistance from public conservation programs; AND Was not restored using private fonds, other than those of the landowner, unless the funds are paid back with interest to the individual or organization that funded the restoration; and the individual or organization notifies the local government unit in writing that the restored wetland may be considered for replacement. Part B: Additional assurances (check all that apply); ❑ The wetland will be replaced before or concurrent with the actual draining or filling of a wetland ❑ An irrevocable bank letter of credit, performed bond, or other acceptable security has been provided to guarantee the successful completion of the wetland replacement. ❑ The wetland losses will be replaced via withdrawal from an account in the State Wetland Bank. Part C: For projects involving any project -specific replacement: I will record the Declaration of Restrictionl and Covenants of the deed for the property of which the replacement wetland(s) will be located; and I will at the same time submit proof of such recording to the LGU. 17. IF REPLACEMENT CONSISTS OF WETLAND BANKING, check appropriate option(s) below. (See HELP 17) N BWSR Road Replacement Program this option is available only for repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction or replacement of existing county, township or city roads. (Note: the TEP must certify that the project qualifies for this option - page 6.) If all of your replacement qualifies for this option - you do not need to answer the remaining questions, please skip to the Applicant Signature Blocks (pages 4 and 5). ❑ State Wetland Bank -proceed to Question 21. (You most also complete the Application for Withdrawal of Credits Form and include with your application, see HELP 6). 18. FOR PROJECTS INVOLVING REPLACEMENT BY WETLAND BANIONG: I affirm that to the best of my knowledge and belief that all information in this application is true, complete and accurate. I affirm that the wetiand losses will be replaced via Public Transportation and Utility Projects, Page 3 withdrawal from an account in the State Wetland Bank. I affirm that a completed withdrawal form has been submitted to the BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator for replacing losses through the State Wetland Bank. 19. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND (S) CONSTRUCTION: (Complete this section only if you are conducting project -specific replacement). See HELP 19 and attach this description on a separate sheet of paper labeled DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND CONSTRUCTION. 20. SURPLUS WETLAND CREDITS: If using project -specific replacement, will the replacement result in any surplus wetland credits that you wish to have deposited in the State Wetland Bank for future use? ❑No ❑Yes. If Yes, submit a Wetland Banking Application directly to your LGU. Copies are available from your LGU, or you may download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us 21. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLANDS: Complete the chart below for all wetland replacement sites (including bank sites) except for replacement to be completed through the BWSR Road Replacement Program If your project has more than one wetland replacement site, reference your overhead view (See Question 6) to this chart. See HELP 21. Name of Wetland Replacement Site Major Watershed number County Section Township Range Predominant Vegetation Proposed Wetland Type New Wetland Credits C Public —Value Credits (PVC) Restored or created? Indicate R or C TOTALS: Applicant Signature Block To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information in this application is true, complete and accurate. I possess the authority to undertake the work described, or I am acting as the duly appointed agent of the applicant. Signature 17/f..,Gy�r�a�v /a�i5/off Date Public Transportation and Utility Projects, Page 4 FOR LGU USE ONLY For projects involving construction of new roads, increased traffic capacity or linear utility of projects, the replacement plan is (Check one): ❑ Approved ❑ Approved with conditions (conditions attached) ❑ Denied LGU official signature Date LGU has received evidence of title and proof of recording of Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland: County where recorded Date Recorded Document # assigned by Recorder LGU official signature Public Transportation and Utility Projects, Page 5 Date APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT (33 CFR 325) OMB APPROVAL NO.0710-003 Expires Dee 31, 2004 The public burden for this cothedon of mfamention is estimated m average 10 hours per response, although the majority of applications should require 5 hours or less. This ivdudes the Vme for nvie-ving instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information, Sendcommuts regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect ofthis collection offi formation, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Depamrant ofDefeose, Washington Headquutm Service Directora¢ oflnformatum Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and in the Office ofMauagemeut and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503. Respoodenn should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number: Please DO NOT REJURN you form w either of these addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District engineer havmgjurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. PRIVACY ACT STATF,MENT: Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1413, Section 103. Principal purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit Routine uses: This information nay be shared with the Depanmevt oflustice and other Federal, state, and IOeal government agencies. Submission ofrequested inforrmtion is voluntary; however, dmfa mation it not provided, the permit application cannot be evaluated tar can a pert be issued. 1. APPLICATION NO. 12. FIELD OFFICE CODE 13. DATE RECEIVED 14. DATE APPLICATION COMPLHIED YOU DO NOT NEED TO COMPLETE ITEMS 6-10 and 12-25 in the SHADED AREAS. All applicants need to complete non-sbaded items 5 and 26. if an agent is to be used, also complete items 8 and 11. This optional Federal form - is valid for use only when included as part of this entire state alwlication packet 5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required) Carver Count 11.9TATEMENr OF AUTHORIZATION (fnpplicabfe; complete only if authortacing an agent) I hereby authorize to act on my behalf au; my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application. APPLICANTS SIGNATURE: -. _ __ _ _ DATE: 26.Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. Signature of applicartV DaW Signahre of agent (if any) - Data The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant), or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement in Block 11 has been filled out and signed. 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up with any trick, scheme, or disguises a material factor makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements cur representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than S10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both. ENG FORM 4345, Jul 97 EDITION OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR) Public Transportation and Utility Projects, Page 6 FOR TEP USE ONLY This section must be completed for projects affecting more than 10,000 sq. ft. of wetland involving repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement of a currently serviceable existing state, city, county, or township public road necessary to meet state or federal design or safety standards or requirements, and for which the impacts are proposed to be replaced by BWSR through the Public Road Replacement Program. No debit of wetland banking credits shall occur until a majority of the TEP members recommend approval by signing below. As indicated below, TEP members recommend the BWSR debit the State Wetland bank to provide replacement for wetland impacts identified on this form, and certify the following: • The public road authority has provided project -specific reports to TEP members at least 30 days prior to beginning construction, or within 30 days after an emergency repair resulting in less than 10,000 flof impact; and • The TEP has reviewed minimization and delineation decisions made by the public road authority and determined the decisions to be satisfactory. ❑ Agree ❑ Disagree SWCD Representative (Date) Representative (Date) ❑ Agree ❑ Disagree ❑ Agree ❑ Agree ❑ Disagree ❑ Disagree Representative (Date) DNR Repmeotative (if applicable) (Date) Public Transportation and Utility Projects, Page 7 Instructions for Part I HELP 2: Indicate road name and/or number, termini and project numbers. HELP 3: List all that apply-, housing, commercial industrial, parks/recreation areas, highways and associated right-of-way, forests, famtsteads/agricultural, vacant lands, public and semi-public (schools, government facilities), airports, extractive (gavel, pits, quarries), other. HELP 4: Please note that a PART H: PUBLIC ROAD MAINTENANCE SHORT FORM has been developed for use with maintenance projects that qualify as either minor or emergency work impacting: minor or emergency work impacting less than 10,000 square feet of wetlands subject to the WCA, OR ❑ minor or emergency work impacting less than 10,000 square feet of certain DNR Public Water Wetlands (i.e., those not assigned a shoreland classification, not classified as lacustrine wetlands or deepwater habitats, or not having state or federal land ownership), provided a copy of this form is sent to the DNR Waters area office prior to initiation of the project, OR ❑ DNR Public Water Wetlands and wetland areas of DNR Public Waterbasins when the DNR has received a copy of the Public Road Maintenance Short Form Notice and has waived the requirement for a DNR Public Water Work Permit to either the LGU responsible for WCA or the public road authority responsible for reporting wetland impacts to the Board of Water and Soil Resources, OR ❑ Existing public road crossings of DNR Public Waters. Contact the DNR Waters Area Hydrologist if assistance is needed on shoreland, lacustrine or deep -water determinations. HELP 9A & 9B: See www.dm.state.mn.us/watersheds/mat).html for a state map with watershed names and numbers. HELP 13: Other permits, reviews or approvals related to the project may include the following: conditional use permit; National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit; state disposal system permit (includes dredged material disposal: watershed district/watershed management organization permit (storm water, erosion, floodplain); groundwater appropriation permit; or county/township driveway/road permit If you do not know whether your project requires state Environmental Assessment Worksheets or Environmental Impact Statements, contact the Environmental Quality Board, 658 Cedar Street, St Paul, MN 55155. Phone 651-297-1257. e-mail: eqb@mnplan.state.nm.us. Web site: www.Mlan.state.nm.us/eqb/review.html. Contact the State Historic Preservation Office for a determination. Phone: 651-296-5434. email: mnshpo@rnnhs.org. HELP 14: If you wish to obtain information on state -listed threatened and endangered species and other natural resource elementscontact the DNR Natural Heritage Program at 651-296-7963. HELP 17: Copies of the Application for Withdrawal of Credits forms are available from your LGU, or you may download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us HELP 19: Describe, in detail, how mitigation wetland(s) will be constructed. If several methods will be used describe each method. Details should include: 1) type of construction (such as excavated in upland, restored the tile break, restored by ditch block or revegetated); 2) type size and specifications of outlet structures; 3) elevations relative to Mean Sea Level or established benchmarks of key features (such as sill, emergency overflow or structure height); 4) what best management practices will be implemented to prevent erosion or site degradation; 5) proposed project start and end dates; and 6) a vegetation management plan. Attach this description on a separate sheet of paper labeled DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND CONSTRUCTION. For projects involving at least some project -specific replacement, include the following additional information ❑ Two drawings to scale of the replacement wetland. Include both overhead view and profile view (side view or cross -sectional view). Without drawings, your application will be considered incomplete. ❑ For created replacement wetlands, include additional soils information (if available) that indicates the capability or the site to produce and maintain wetland characteristics. ❑ Note 1: For replacement wetlands located on pipeline easements, you need to receive endorsement of ygur project from both the easement holder and the Minnesota Department of Public Safety's Office of Pipeline Safety. Before state of construction, the owner of any utilities involved must be notified. The landowners or contractor is responsible for giving this notice by calling Gopher State One -Call at 651-454-0002 (Twin Cities Metro Area) or 1-800-252-1166 (all other locations). ❑ Note 2: For extensive or complex projects, supplementary information may be requested at a later date from one or more of the responding agencies. Such information may include (but not be limited to) the following topographic map, water table map, soil borings, depth soundings, aerial photographs, and environmental assessment and/ or engineering reports. HELP 21: If you do not have access to some of the information requested, or if you do not know your replacement ratio, call your LGU or SWCD office for assistance. Public Transportation and Linear Utility Projects Instructions, Page 1 What to include on Plans (Part 1) Detailed overhead views of impact site(s) and replacement site(s), as well as profile view(s) of replacement site(s) may be hand drawn, computer generated or professionally prepared, as long as they contain all necessary information clearly, accurately, and in adequate detail. Please include specific dimensions whenever possible. You may also include photos, if you wish. Overhead views of impact site(s) and replacement site(s) should include the following items that pertain to your project 1. Location and extent of shoreline, wetlands and water. 2. Section, township and range of site(s). 3. Location and dimensions of proposed project, structure or activity. Include length, width, elevation and other measurements, including old and new alignments, as appropriate. 4. For bridge and culvert projects, include hydrology and hydraulic reports as applicable.. 5. Points of reference (such as existing bridges, culverts, landscape features). 6. Location of inlet and outlet structures. 7. Indication of north. 8. Location of spoil and disposal sites (if applicable). 9. Location of photo reference points for future monitoring of replacement site(s). Profile views (side or cross sectional views) of replacement site(s) should include the following items that pertain to your project: 1. Location and dimensions of proposed project, structure or activity. Include elevation, depth, soil profile, side slope, and other measurements as appropriate. 2. Proposed water level elevation. 3. Areas of wetland and upland plants established on replacement site(s). Other information 1. Property boundaries. 2. Location and extent of shoreline and water. 3. Location and dimensions of proposed project, structure or activity include length, width, elevation and other measurements as appropriate. 4. Points of reference (such as existing bridges, culverts or landscape features). 5. Location of inlet and outlet structures. 6. Indication of north. 7. Location of spoil and disposal sites (if applicable). Final Checklist Attachments must include: Project Locator Map Description of Work Completed (Question 12; if answered "Yes") Overhead View of Project Adjoining Property Owners (for projects that require a COE individual permit) Status of Other Approvals List Signed application for the Department of the Army Permit (Page 5) to seek Federal authorization of your project? Attachments may also include: Sequencing Considerations (Question 8; if additional space is needed) Listing of Special Consideration (Question 14; if answered `Yes") SHPO archaeological or cultural resource determinations or surveys (Question 13; if required and if completed) If project includes any wetland banking, attachments must include: Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits (Section 17) If project includes any project specific replacement, attachments must include: 1) Description of Replacement Wetland Construction (Section 19); 2) Vegetation Management Plan (HELP 19); and 3) Two drawings to scale (HELP 19) Public Transportation and Linear Utility Projects Instructions, Page 2 Preparing your Application for Mailing. To apply for both state and Federal authorization, your application must include Part I (Pages 1-4), the Federal application (Page 5) and attachments as indicated on final Checklist for Part I (Instructions, Page 4). Make three copies of the entire application and all attachments. Keep the original, and mail the three copies to the appropriate local, state, and Federal agencies (see below). Mailing your application. Mail a complete copy of your application to each of the local state, and Federal entities listed below. Include Part L and all attachments. If you are using the Public Road Maintenance Short Form Notice include required attachments. LOCAL: Send to the appropriate Local Government Unit (LGU). Contact your county Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office or the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) web site (www.bwsr.state.mn.us) for this information. SWCD offices are also listed on the BWSR web site. For local road projects that qualify for wetland replacement under the BWSR Public Road Replacement Program, also send a complete copy of tfie application, including TEP member signatures on page 6, and attachments to the BWSR Wetland Banking Administrator at 1 West Water Street, Suite200, St. Paul, MN 55107, phone 651-2974958. STATE: Send to your area DNR Waters office, attention Area Hydrologist. Contact your county Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office or the DNR web site (www.dm.state.mn.us) for this information. Area offices can also be determined by contacting the applicable Regional DNR office: NW Region: 2115 Birchmont Beach Road N.E. NE Region: 1201 East Highway 2 Bemidji, MN 56601 Grand Rapids, MN 55744 Phone:218-755-3973 Phone:218-327-4416 Central Region: 1200 Warner Road Southern Region: 261 Highway 15 South St. Paul, MN 55106 New Ulm, MN 56073 Phone: 651-772-7910 Phone: 507 359-6053 FEDERAL: Send to the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulatory field office: Brainerd: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch, 10867 E. Gull Lake Drive N.W., Brainerd, MN 56401-9051, Phone:218-929-8402 St. Paul: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch, Army Corps of Engineers Centre, 190 5`s Street East, St. Paul, MN 55101-9051, Phone: 651-290-5375 La Crescent: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch,1114 South Oak Street, La Crescent, MN 55947-1338, Phone:507-895-8059 Two Harbors: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory Branch, 1554 Highway 2, Suite 2, Two Harbors, MN 55161, Phone: 218-834-6630 Public Transportation and Linear Utility Projects Instructions, Page 3 Adioinine Property Owners P.I.D. Landowner Mailing Address 254120010 Magdy A. & June L. Ebrahim 521 Pineview Ct. Chanhassen, NIN 55317 254120020 Donald E. Halla & Sandra J. Cwayna Halla 10000 Great Plains Blvd Chaska, MN 55318 254120030 John & Anna Mae Makela 9860 Raspberry Hill Chaska, MN 55318 250253300 Roger A. & Kimberly A. Lee 600 961h Street W Chanhassen, MN 55317 250253100 Robert & Christin E. Boecker 610 96 b Street W Chanhassen, MN 55317 250253500 Andrew T. Riegert 620 96'h Street W Chanhassen, MN 55317 250253800 Theodore B. & Karen K. Hasse 630 96 h Street W Chanhassen, MN 55317 253050050 Lisa Cuff 9855 Delphinium Lane Chaska, MN 55318 253050030 Roger G. Novotny 560 Pineview Ct Chanhassen, MN 55317 253050020 Richard S. & Katherine S. Asplin 541 Pineview Ct Chanhassen, MN 55317 253050190 Donald E. Halla & Sandra J. Cwayna Halla 1 Great Plains Blvd _ Chaska, a, MN 55318 PROJECT MEMORANDUM TH 101 AND C.S.A.H. # 14 (PIONEER TRAIL) INTERSECTION MODIFICATION: PEACE SIGNAL, SAFETY AND CAPACITY EMPRO VEMENT, CREATE ATE RIGHT AND LEFT, THROUGH LANES 1N ALL DIRECTIONS. REH"I]LITATE THE DRAINAGE. Metro District-1v1n/DOT 1500 Rest County Road B2, Roseville, MN 55113 PROJECT MEMORANDUM J t SP 1009-14 TH 101 AND C.S.A.H. # 14 (PIONEER TRAIL) INTERSECTION MODIFICATION: PLACE SIGNAL, SAFETY AND CAPACITY LVIPROVEMENT, CREATE RIGHT AND LEFT, THROUGH LANES IN ALL DIRECTIONS. REHABILITATE THE DRAINAGE. Metro District - Mn/DOT 1500 Rest County Road B2, Rvsev0le, AIN 55113 h m � s y,� O O J = N � N O N T V x m EG AMH a}e3S OL Amn iq 3 11 ".7 y � Stat0��M1 • d 4 mG x 0 Z AMH ale m �1. o� U ct 0 RELI I M �FF ICE w0RI�Si t w r ' i W SHOW ' N ' W S JECT ` O E1 0 PLOT 2� LRY [ ti O Ilia ° M a t ° 0 ° O �• IDOL © i a Mn/DOT Basin: Wetland 1 Mn/DOT Basin Type: 3 DNR Designation: N.A. DNR T P. Type: N.A. Basin Size: 10.5 ac Total Encroachment: 0.11 ac a 1�— — — — — — — — — — ° lie j� oo � r Mn/DOT Basin: Wetland i Mn/DOT Basin Type: 2 DNR Designation: N.A. DNR Type: N.A. NWI Type: N.A. Basin Size: 10.5 ac Total Encroachment: 0.01ac ¢ a F t 1 I °fl r---------- o _J N J o -- — -- — — — 111 i < t o t O flfl Wetland Impacts �___ STATE PROJ. NO. 1005-14 (TH 101 ) SHEET NO. 1 OF i SHEETS PROJECT 1EMORA lLi lM Review: Draft Final X Trunk Highway 101 at Pioneer Trail, (C.S.A.H.14) State Project Number. 1009-14 Federal Project Number no federal fends Project Teri: T.H.101 from 650' north of C.S.A.H.14 (Pioneer Tram to 650' south of C.S.A.H:14, and CSAH 14 from 650' east of TH 101 to 650' west of TM. 101. CitAies): City of Chanhassen County(ies): Carver County Section, Township, Range: See. 25, T 116 N, R 23 W Program: Safety and Capacity Program. Brief Project Description: Construct a signalized intersection with left and right tm•n hues for each of the foot legs. Letting Date: February 25, 2005,�Fl1 Project Manager. Geoff Prelgo ��• Phone:651-634-2355 ttt a if tcuSeA P�E, Metro District Resource Engineer APPROVED BY: _N/A Richard A. Etasky, P.E., Chief Environmennl Engineer DESIGN EXCEPTIONS APPROVED BY: N/A Mukthar Thalns P.E., State Design Engineer ate Date ,Date This document is available in alternative formats to individuals with disabilities by calling the Project Manager at the phone number listed above orYhrough the Minnesota Relay Service at I-800fi27-3529. Table of Contents PROJECT Area ..---,..._....-_... _................... _........ ii Project Map. Table of Contents. ... tv L REPORT PURPOSE II. PROJECT DESCRLYTION _ _ EXCTMGCONDMON.......................... PROPOSED PROJECT ...................................... III. COST AND FUNDING SOURCE _---_---- IV. SCHEDULE AND PROJECT MANAGER V. NEED FOR CAPACITY........... ................................................................................................................... 2 SAFE'rY ---------------- VL ALTERNATIVES No-BuuD ALTERNATIVE ................................ ..... .................. .........•- .... 2 ..........._._... PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE .................... _....... _.... VIL SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEE) EMPACl'S„...»._....._—.3 ACCESS CONTROL:......_.._ ........................ ...._ BucEWAYS AND PEDESTRIANS ........................... CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS ..............................._....._.........._»_.. CONTAMINATED PROPERTIES ...... _..................... _......... �^ 5 ........_.............................................. EROSION CONTROL ...................... _..... ............. 5 EXCESS MATERIALS ...................... _... _...... FARMLAND IMPACTS .._......................... . FlsH AND wuDLm ............................ ... ......... _................... ..•.-- ... ...------ ....... b ................._........................... _...... ....................... ...................... ........... .... .................................. 6 RIGHT OF WAY ..__................................. _------------------- -------------------------- --------------------- 6 -----....... ................ ._....................... DIREA TENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES, FEDERAL ........................... . _..................... 6 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES, SPECIES OF SPECIAL. CONCERN, STATE......._._.: 6 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ....................:.......... 7 ulrmnlEs..........................••.._................... 7 VEGETATION ..................... . . . . WATERQUA =......_. ............ ........... ........ ............................................. .... ..... — `ti erns...:...:.--•-----•-•-•-•--------• .:.............7 V'M- MITIGATION _ - _............................. ......3 ILL PUBLICAND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT (PERMITS/APPROVALS)............. _.... 3 GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS AND EXCEPTIONS M. LEVEL OF ACTION.: 33 E APPENDIX --------- _ _. _ .:.,_... ..10 (v) - FlimN. IDOT DOCS#356344-v14PRO]ECT_11EhIEOR1NDUM_FOR-1009-14_(M_1010_?.T_CSAH_14) PROJECT'MEMORA-NDUM- - — S.P 1009-14 (T.H. lol/ CSAH 14) I. The Project Memorandum for this Class II (Categorical Exclusion) action documents the project-s Deed, Project descnption, social, economic and eaviro�eental impacts, and design standards and exceptions. Funding information, anticipated schedule and Project manager are also included. H PROJECT DESCRUmoN Existing Condition The proposed project is located in the city of Chanhassen in Carver County, Mimuesota west ofEden Prairie- Presently the junction of T$ Tx 101 and Pioneer arl (C.S-&H. 14) is an at -grade intersection controlled by stop signs and no loin lines. T$ 101 is a two-lane rural highway, with 12 ft wide bituminous paved lanes and 8 ft wide bituminous paved shoulders in the Project area- T.H. 101 goes from Elk River, Mn to Shakopee, Mu and mad widths, grades and sight lines vary greatly. 40 M.P.H. is the posted speed on T-H.101 near Pioneer Trail. T$ 101 has an average daily traffic of2900 (2000 ADT counts)- Pioneer Trail (C.S. A$ 14) is a two-lane rural highway with side access and its average daily traffic is 4.130 (2000 ADT coimis). Conditions cause backups dining the muffing and evening peak hours C-S A H 14 goes from West Hennepin Co. Line to the junction with County Road 11 in Laketown Township west of Chaska- Posted speed limit on C.SAH 14 is 45 WIL Proposed Project The proposed project is illustrated on the project map. Project features include: • Each approach leg will have a 13' wide left tam hme; a 12' wide right turn lane, and a 12' through lane; all clannelizabon will be with painted stripes, not raised medians. • A new signal will be installed at the intersection and will have pedestrian crossing indicators- • Eight foot wide bitumnous shoulders will be constructed on T$101 and an additional one and one half foot width will be gravel within the project ]milts and on the west leg of C-S-r_LH.14. Oa the east leg of C.S.AIL 14, the shoulders will match the inplace shoulders. • In the northeast comer of the intersection, a Paved sidewaWtiail will be constructed to correct -to an existing pedestrian/bicycle trail. Pedestrian and bicycle paths are planned for other coraers of this intersection, but will not be constructed nm this project ' Drainage will be carried in ditches along the roadway. A calvert paralleling the west side of Ta 101, south of C.S.A lL 1 - is being investigated to lh the area of cons4udion disturbance. nit M. COST AND FUNDING SOURCE The total cost of this project is I estimated at $1,500,000-, $920,000 for construction and $600,000 for Tight of way. The Precise cost of right of way is not yet available. See the Project Management Scheduling System (Artemis) Funding Report in the appendix for additional information. Project cost and finding will use state aid fiords, so state -aid standards need n be addressed Ile Project Management Scheduling System will contain the latest available funding idbrmation IV. SCHEDULE AND PROJECT MANAGER Project Letting Date: February 25, 2005 Cmeltrwtion begins: Aprfl 1, 2005 Highway opens to Traffic: August 1, 2005 Page 1 � rumor nocsawus.iy�exoic� �smeovarro� rae_�wru�rg w ai_Ctu M PROJ'-CT'NTWORANL DLW - S.F. 1OW14 (T.H.1011 CSAH 14) The project schedule (Activity Report) from Mv/DOTs project Management Scheduling System (Artemis) is in the appendix. The project schedule may change. The Project Management Scheduling Sys�m-wiII eont�the-}atest-es^d@ated leitingdate-and-pte-leltutg-aotivip�staeyy-informati The Project Manager is: The Report Prepmer is: CJeOffiry PM190 Gregg Iverson 1500 west County Road B2 1500 west Comity Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 Roseville, MN 55113 Phone: (651) 634-2355 Phone: (651) 582-1322 V. ' NERD FOR PROJECT Capacity This project will reduce delay for the increasing traffic levels on TH 101/ C.SA14.14_ Left -tam lanes at TH 101and C.S.AIL 14 should improve capacity and long backups that are current problems. Current peak hour volumes and turns are shown on the Project Map. The table below shows the travel delay and level of service (LOS) for the existing condition (All -way stop). The LOS for the existing condition exceeds capacity during the morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) peals hours - Level of Service S and Travel Delay 2002 Peak Hour All -way stop Signalized (Existingcondition fened alternative De]a =—Jveh.) LOS 1 Dela sec-/veb.) LOS AM 291.60 F 9.8 A PM 14438 F 8.7 A Table Notes: (1) All -way stop mnimltmvel delay and LOS calculated using 2000 Mgh ay Capacity ManualmChod for ua signalized int=,-,ti=. (2) Signalized travel delay and LOS calculated using Synchm 5 (3) Loss at all -way stops is defined w follova; LOS A= 0-10 sec, delay/vehicle; LOS B=>10-15 see. delay/vehicle; LOS C=>15-25 sec. delay/vehicle; LOS D=>25-35 sec. delayhehicly LOS E _> 35-50 sec. dehsy/vebxle; LOS F = > 50 sec, deLry/vehich:. (4) LOSs at signalized intersections is defined= follows: LOS A= 0-10 see, delay/vehicle-, LOS B=>10-20 sec. delay/vehicic; LOS C=>20-35 sec. dehy/vcWclq LOS D=>35-55 sec. delaylvehicly LOS E=>55-80 sec. delay/veiriclr., LOS F =>80 sec. delay/vehicle. See Appendix for ""Highway Capacity Manual all -way stop capacity, analvSis" and "Synchro 5 signalized capacity analysis., Safety According to MnDOT's ugh Crashra ' Cost Da/Informatfon web page, this intersection ranks 2261 out of nearly 4000 intersections in the database. V1. ALTERNATIVES No -Build Alternative Under the "No -Build alternative, no geometric changes would be made to the intersection. Normal pavement and Signage maintenance would be performed. The "No-narr alternative would not solve back up and capacity problems at the TH 101 and Pioncer Trar1 intersection Page 2 �3[mor_Dpcs 0et.1>�sn>HC� JImIIOYLAm. W!_i96y-M-IY AT_ass 1q PROJECT mMWORANDUM - S.Y. 1009-14 (T.81oll CSAH 14i — Preferred Alternative The preferred alternative is desc abed in the Proposed Project section above- VIOL SOCIAL. ECONOIAM. AND ENVIRONMNTAL (SEE) EUTACTS This project has been reviewed for its potential effects on the environment and community. Information is presented for those items checked "yes" and meriting mdividual discussion. If items are checked in the "no effect" boo, they have been considered, relative to appropriate laws, executive orders, rates, and regulations. Change access to properties , change X See "Nodes Access Control (close location, make one-way, etc.)? clarifying SEE Air tv Affect air ? concerns." X Brlreways & Pedestrians Affect bicycle and/or pedestrian movements? X See "Notes clarifying SEE coacems » Coastal Zone Im acts Affect hi al Lake ? X Construction mna Cause construction is ernsi impacts ( on noise, X See "Notes air, vibration, etc.)? clarifying SEE concerns » Involve excavation (including utilities) m X See "Notes Contaminated any known or potentially contaminated clarifying SEE Properties or Nl2terials property, or handling of any contaminated concerns." materials? Controversy Be controversial or be likely to cause X combo Critical Areas Be in the hfississipp, River c ntical area? X Economic Impacts Affect business activity or have otter X economic impacts? Ene Iurmacts Rave ma or energy unpheations? X )lave disproportionately high and adverse X FMIkonmental Justice him health or environmental effects on minority populations and low-income Dourdatims? Involve major soil disturbance (depth or )E See "Notes Erosion Control volume) or have erosion potential due to clarifying SEE land font, wind atterns or water volume? concerns' Ezeess Materials Involve disposal of excess materials outside X See "Notes planned construction limits? clarifying SEE concerns" Farmland Impacts Require any right of way? X See "Notes clarifying SEE concerns." Fish and Rrddlife Affect fish or wildlife? X See "Notes cb fymg SEE Flood sins Cross or he 'acent to any lloodolain area? X concerns-" Page 3 Fir \T'OOi "06 ��t56Jhr11-PADJPI�_NEpiOYAAUUM_'noII_IGOhK ;T8 !MO AT 61"_.�) PROJE T MIMORANDUIW - S.P.16o9-14 (T.H.1llv CSAH 14) Groundwater Geology Affect groundwater, geology, or cause s v. x F-vthborn Vibration earthbom vibrations? I Handicapped Affect sidewalk or curb and gutter (design X See "Notes for)? Clarifying SEE Concerns" Historical Affect any hlStOncal, archaeological, or X See "Notes Anhaeoloaeal cultural cultural site? clarifying SEE concerns" Land Use Impacts Be inconsistent with local and regional land X useplans? Noise Affect noise sensitive receptors? X Parks, Recreation, Use MIY U Oi&ant public park, recreation, X Seetion 4M or 6ff1 or wtidlife or waterfowl refugees, or any B AWCONI land historical site? Will the project affect any LAWCON Lauri? Right of Way Require any right of way (or easements)? X See "Notes clarifying SEE coaccros_" Relocation Require my relocation of homes or X businesses? Stream or Water I3odv Change the course, current, or cross section of arry stream? X Momention Affect public safety (i.e. police or fire X See "Notes protection)? clarifying SEE . Social concerns." Impact sensitive groups (cUdreq X handi minorities r, etc.)? Affect accessibility to schools, churches, X recreation facilities, etc.? Affect cor,tmity cohesion? X Threatened and Endangered Species. Affect any Federal endangered species due X See "Notes Federal to project location and design? c SEE Threatened and X concerns." See "Notes Endangered Sneries Affect any State endangered species due to clarifying SEE Species of Soeelal project location and design? concerns Concern. State -- Traffic Forecasts Correct capacity deficiencies? is there a x See `Notes detour or major traffic delay? . clarifying SEE Transit Affect transit mutes? X concerns." Tribal Lands Affect Tribal Lands? X Utilities Affect utilities? X See "Notes clarifying SEE crmcems." Vegetation "°� X See "Notes clrrifying SEE concerns." Page 4 F�� nvrovr_aocs.�vu..rwxwecr_iva>=owyou� soa �o.r-:a rrn ...... a Iq PROJECT 1YfEMORANDL'M - S_P.1009-14 Visual Quality Water Quality Wetlands Affect visual 101/ CSAH (view to or from Affect water quality of lakes, streams, wetlands, etc.? Have wetlands present within the construction limits? rrua am Jcenic Rivers- Affect Canoe & Boating -a state or federal wild & scenic river, Rivers, -federal candidate wild & scenic river, NORRA -state canoe and boating river, or Notes clarifying SEE concerns: Access Control: X X See "_Notes clarifying SEE concerns." X See "Notes clarifying SEE concerns-" X I This project will close a field entrance on the south side of C.S.A_H. 14 approximately 250' east of the intersection. The property owner will access this property from a second entrance 800' east from the intersection Both locations are shown on the Project Map. Bikeways and Pedestrians This project has separate bikeway/pedestrian facilities along a trail at the north edge of C.S.A.H. 14 and east edge of TH 101_ Connection to the existing Grails on the northeast comer of the intersection is provided by this project. Future county and city plans (not part of this project) call for trails to extend west and southfrom this intersection, west on C.S.A_H. 14 and south on T H 101. The new signal will have pedestrian crossing indicator lights_ Construction Impacts Construction will result in construction -related air quality, noise and dust impacts, and possible erosion impacts during the construction period. Disposal of excess material will comply with the projeef a standard specifications, and will not occur in wetlands, floodplains, or other sensitive areas. A traffic control plan will be developed daring the design phase. Contaminated Properties A review of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Geographic Information System files was completed for the project area. The evaluation indicated that no properties with (mown contamination are located near the project area that could be impacted by the project. See Letter in Appendix dated Match 4, 2003. Erosion Control This project may result in some erosion since about I to 2 acres of existing ground cover will be removed during construction. MnDOT will apply for an NPDES permit Temporary and permanent erosion control plans, as well as best management practices (BMP's) contained m MwDOT's standard specifications, details and special provisions will be followed- Less than one acre of new impervious surface will be constructed. Excess Materials Page 5 rt�nuroar_oop.asam.+u-++nucT >m¢wumosr_Fn¢ ve<u� vu at_oas_ul PROJECT 14EIMORA:YDUy1 _ S.P.1009-14 (T$.101/ CSAH 14) Excess materials and debris from this project such as roadway bituminous will be disposed of in accordance with M W DOT Standard Specification for Construction, 21043C and Minnesota Rule Park excess ma not be p -in wetlands or floodplains. Farmland impacts This project will require acquisition of right of way. The right of way to be acquired ed lies in an area committed for urban development, which has not been protected as farmland by the State or any local unit of government The provisions of the Farmland Protection Policy Act do not apply to this project Fish and Wildlife The DNR responded to a request for a DNR Questionnaire (see appendix). The DNR noted that, while there are known occurrences of rare species or natural communities within a one -rage radius of the project, standard construction practices (e.g., runoffprevention) should ensure that these remain unaffected by the project activity. Handicapped There are curbs constructed along the southwest comer of the intersection, along the new culvert on the west side of T.H. 101. There are no sidewalks in the southwest quadrant so handicapped mvividuals wit not be affected. Sidewalk connections will be constructed in the northeast quadrant The sidewalks will have flat grades that will not impede physically handicapped individuals The new signal will have pedestrian crossing lights. Historical See the Appendix for the SHPO consultation letters dated April 16,2003 and May 23, 2003. Right of Way Permanent right of way is needed from eight parcels. These are large single-family residential parcels_ The right of way will be strip -takings up to 50-feet in width, along TH 101 and CSAH 14_ This right of way is needed for the roadway widening, sight -comers and storm sewer. One field enhance will be closed (see access control above).Temporary construction easements will be needed. Right of way acquisition will be conducted in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property. Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended. Social: Emergency Vehicle Preece tern (EW) will be installed on the new signals. EVP's allow especially equipped emergency vehicles to change the signal lights to green Threatened and Endangered Species, Federal According to information provided by the Natural Heritage Database maintained by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, there are no known occurrences of federal threatened or endangered species within the project area (see Tbreatened and Endangered Species memo from MnDOT Natural Resource Coordinator in appendix). This is a state -funded project, however it may require a U.S. Corps of Engineers permit, due to filling of wetlands_ Federal agencies that authorize, fund, or carry out a proposed project are required to evaluate whether a proposed action "may affect" a listed species. If U.S. Corps ofEngineers permit is required for this project, that agency will make the deterra nation as part of the permit process. MuDOT anticipates the US COE will conclude that the project will have no effect on federal threatened or endangered species. Threatened and Endangered Species, Species of Special Concern, State The DNR provided continents on this project (See Appendix for letter dated: May 16, 2003)_ ). The DNR noted that, while there are known occurrences of rare species or natural communities within a Page 6 aeaemor_no¢aspu.,+wwsR �,tuuw� ,esu-rnijmk at anew/ PROJECT AjIMORA14DUiYf - S.P.1009_14 (TX_ 101] CSAH 1A) - - - — onemile radius of the project, standard construction practices (e.g., ruroff prevention) should ensure that these remain unaffected by the project activity. Traffic Forecasts There will not be a detour as part of this project Two lanes of traffic (one in each direction) will be carried through the project area during construction. Lane shins (and any temporary lanes closes) will be signed following the blinnesoh Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (b1N MLrfm) guidelines. Access to properties along the project will remain open drum. construction Utilities No public utilities will be moved because of this reconstruction project. Private utilities that will need to be relocated include a gas line, electric cable and power poles, fiber optic cable, buried phone cable as well as a signal cable and hand hole. Vegetation This project will impact a number of trees along T.H. 101 and CSAH 14. Mn/DOT's Forestry Unit reviewed the vegetation in the project area. see the Appendix for Vegetation Review Memo dated 10/30/2003. There are 18 trees on the west side of T.H. 101 north of CSAH 14. Ten of these trees are worthy of transplanting to different sites. West of T.A. 101, along the south side of CSAH 14, is a band of trees consisting of Red Oak, Sugar Maple, Basswood, and Aspen. This area falls under a conservation easement A conservation easement covers a band approximately 60 feet wide, parallel to the south CSAH 14 right of way line. The area covered by the conservation easement is shown on the map attached to the Vegetation Review Memo. More information about the conservation easement is in the letter from the City of Chanhassen to Mr. Don Halla dated 10/4/94, which can be found in the appendix. Trees that may be removed because of this project are identified on the map attached to the Vegetation Review Memo. The 18 trees west of T.I1. 101 and north of CSAH 14, as well as about 9,000 sq. tL of tree canopy along the west side of T.H. 101 south of CSAH 14, will likely be removed. To minimize impacts, tree protection fencing will be installed along construction limits to avoid any unnecessary damage to the trees outside of the construction limits. As part of the Final Design Process, either a consulting forester or a member of the Forestry Unit should do a Comprehensive Vegetation Protection and Salvage Review (Forestry Plan). The plan should include the following components: Tree and other woody plant/plaut comarm ity protection opportunities Tree and other woody plant transplant opportunities Timber utilization opportunities Hazard tree identification Mn/DOT Standard Specificaifons for Construction section 2572 will direct the contractor as to appropriate treatment for vegetation protection. See the Vegetation Review Memo for suggestedpay items. Water Quality This Project wil increase the existing impervious surface area by 0.82 acre. Associated highway nm- off will be increased Drainage from the project area will be via grassy ditches. Since the total new, inVervious area is less than 1 acre, no new pending areas are planned as part of this project Wetlands Page 7 1�MmlT!-UUCP-i35pW11ApQCT ]QMLWAI®U� FUi_L6M.-(}p IOU AT 6f/_1A PROJECT-IMMORA.*IDUM - S.P.1009-14 (T.H.101/ CSAH 141 Wetlands Metro District's wetland delineator reviewed this project for wetland locations. A PlIMC flow through wetland, of approximately 10.5 acres, exists in the northwest quadrant of this intersection. This project will fill approximately 0.13 acres due to the addition of left and right turn lanes on CSAH 14. An alternative that could have avoided wetland impacts would realign C.S.A.H. 14 to the south, which would have required additional impacts to the trees on the south side of C.S-kR 14. Acquiring this right of way and impacting the trees did not seem prudent Impacts to the wetland will be mini mimed by using inslopes of various values suggested by State Aid Standards. Iaslopes along wetland areas will be at a 1:4 slope from the shoulder to a point 30-Feet from the edge of shoulder, and then at a 1:3 slope to the bottom of the slope. Inslopes will be at a 1.6 slope at the corner radius for intersecting roads and driveways. According to Metro Water Resources Eugmeermg wetland impacts from this project will be mitigated by wetland banking credits. The county will obtain wetland credits for this project from the Minnesota Board of Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR). VIII_ NIITIGATION lvfitigation for project impacts is discussed in Section VU, above. Particular attention should be paid to - the subheadings listed below: Right of Way Vegetation Wetlands LY- PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT (PERMJTS/APPROVALS) The project manager has been in contact with city and county staff regarding this project The design for the project will be submitted for review by local authorities, including City of Chanhassen and Carver County Highway Department Motorists will be notified of the project start date and possible traffic delays by placing highway - warning signs along the project prior to the start of construction. A public information meeting is not planned for this project A NPDES permit is needed for this project Mmlicipal consent is not needed, since this project improves the safety of the intersection The county wig obtain wetlandcredit for this project from BWSR X. GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS AND EXCEPTIONS Based on the Design Standards Documentation Requirement; and on the Type of Work, TH 101 will be designed to Mu/DOTs Preservation standards and CSAH 14 will be designed to Minnesota State - aid standards at Minnesota Rule 8820.9920 - Geometric design standards; rural and suburban undivided; new or reconstruction projects. See the Design Appendix for the Geometric Design Standards Tables. Page 8 ,t Csw ,y PR'C)JECTI+�A*yl()RA�NDtjiM-S.P.1009-14(TX.101/CSAH14) M. LEVEL OF -NMON This project is a Federal Categorical Exclusion (Class 11 Action Category 3 CFR 771.117 (d) I)- It is included in a State Exemption category as well (Miun. R_ Ch. 441OA600 subpart 14 c. It is U=fcre excluded from further environmental documentation. There are no extraordinary circumstances such as: 1. Significant impacts on the caviromment; 2. Substantial controversy on environmental grounds; 3. Significant impacts to Section 4(f) or 106 property; 4-- Inconsistency with any federal, state or local law or administrative deteriammumn relating to the environment X11. MAL REPORT DISTRIBUTION CHECKLIST MS fteirt w Inside Mn/DOT District Detailed Design Construction Other (Metro Division documentation file) I Central Office District File Public Hearing File Outside NIrkIDOT District Metropolitan Council Regional Development Commission Muni cTality(ies): Chanhassen I County(ics):Carver County Highway D t I Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 3 -Federal ffighwayAcharmistradom Other: Central Office CentralOffice Federal Highway Admimstration -United States Fish and Wildlffe Service Minnesota Department of Natural Resources _Nfirmesota. Pollution Control Agency Minnesota Department of Agriculture Other. Page 9 1 PROJI-LCT MEMORAINDUi04 - S ➢. 1009-14 (T.M 1011 CSAH 14) - - - - APPENDIX ♦ Project Funding Report ♦ Activity Report ♦ Geometric Design Table, TH 101 ♦ Safety of Design Exceptions along this Project. ♦ Geometric Design Table, C.S.A.H 14 ♦ DNR Letter dated April 17, 2003 ♦ SHPO response to request for consultation ♦ Contaminated Property Review ♦ Threatened and Endangered Species ♦ Comments from MnDOT Forestry Unit ♦ Metro District Tree Policy ♦ Letter form City of Chanhassen, to Mr. Don Halla dated 10/4/94, notifying Mr. Halla of conservation easement on trees ♦ Highway Capacity Manual - All -Way Stop capacity analysis ♦ Synchro 5 signalized capacity analysis Page 10 stkpamot noa.�o«.,>�i_maswumoK � xe-u1xe ,m.v_a.._in Minnesota Department of Transportation v Fund Listing by Project OIYP� Dist: M Areal C SPt 1009-14 Status'Active Route Types TH Routes 101 County Carve Program: SC Project Manager: GeoffProlgo/Geoft'Prelgo Phase: P,R Descriptions AT PIONEER TRAIL IN CHANHASSEN-CHANNELIZE AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION Current Estimates $920,000.00 Relocation: Primary Work Types Traffic Control Devices Original Estimate: $545,000.00 Unit Of Measurements English Original Let Date; 10/22/04 Parcels: 8 Notes Tim Pane Fed Code Org Code Estimated Amount Let Amount Encumbered $ Poet Award Amount Cod 1009-14 02 4437058 $600,000.00 1009.14 04 4433058 $460,000.00 1009-14 04 4433058 $460,000.00 Estimates: Grand Totalu Mllau 0.00 - P. E. R/W 00,00 $600,0000 E&C $0.00 ' CONST $920.000.00 AGREE $0.00 UTILITY $0.00 STATE AID $0.00 TRANSIT $0.00 ENHANCEMENT $0.00 PARTNERSHIP $0.00 .MONK YARD $0.00 OTHER $0.00 TOTALr 51,520,000.00 w/ ur, AVVIG IYUInLIL{l WHERE Project Statue IN'PRO','ACT' AND , SP Number -1009.14 Districts IN'M' Date: Oct 29 2003 Let D ate: ] oY.t2�n4 �� Con9t Cost: $920,00 ,00 Center Lane Miles: '00 Fed Rncnm LF SF Paget ( Date j 1003 1004 1004 1 j'. Mn/DOT 32'1TII2 OTS, PR07ECT MAIYAGEMEN-T SCHE'DI1LF METRO Page i of 1 D33 1009-14 AT IOI CTRAI (3Ncm !y��: -1&11 a AT PIDBEa3 TRAIL SR CRG_L2T: 10-22-04 CUR -LET: 2-25-05 PROMAR:sC: : SC W11= CS�SgyR-CRAHBRLIEE AHD TRAFFIC SIGNAL ffiSTALLA TICK TYPE' Traffic Ulz Cont.--Ol Devices 0 MI. 0 REG.RF.PRTT: 010+00.261 COST 3ST CHANGE. - 08G_COST: $Sq5, Op0 ,G END FT. OS RF.PHT: +00.261 010 C0R-COST: $920,000 AREA ailaai.l- LYya, ED'B nennw--�, DAL4: 2E� AIfY: PREL. 'ROT. =- $ala-o, Geoff ..-_ D Cm BSG: Yco, .cy F01�1 DRSIGNMTCES: F1E. DES. 8 RIILOCS: R/H COST: PROD. HGR: Prejgp, Geoff ERG. $600, 000 mm- SSCaHDA2 HRS TYPRSe AOTH: SF Lp PLAM REMY Dan: . -_00H 'WU222S: 1009-14: P�T51117, R=T57047 ASS^^" SPs: TIES: ACT HDH DRSCRIPT-rm % RRH EARLY BA.RLY AR LATE TOTYLAT- ____ _______ Dom ______________ C1:ffi SSABT FIIiT_SH FLOAT START ACTIIAI ____ 3001 START ---DUR ____ _______- ________ ________ ----- ________ ------ START FIBISI - 1032 DI 0 CT LAB SDRVBY 90 100 0 100 8-12-02 _______ --- ---- -'---- 0 8-12-02 1040 Offi_ ® 5'ORVRgg 0 10-1-03 8-12- 0 1070 30 �07�'Z 100 0 6-1-03 7-26-03 10-1- MM40RAlW M 90 1140 PIHAL GEOHSTBIC LAYO 70 27 11-28-03 12-24-03 9- 27-03 10-23-03 0 4-23-03 6-1- -62 1160 30 F217AL DESSTI 90 3 12-25-03 12-27-03 10-31-03 11-2-03 1-25-03 -55 ICATION 30 1165 SIGNAL .705TZPTCATIOB 100 0 2-4-03 3-17-03 TS Y 4 TS 30 0 O 10-23-02 2-4- 341 1181 SO1180 RHVn AppEo 60 SOILS :' APPRO 0 60 12-28-03 2-25_04 8-25-04 10-23-04 241 30 1195 DYII.IT_v CO0RDINATICR 0 30 2-26-04 3-26-04 10-29-04 13-32-04 241 60 1200 ccusTRucTIOH LIHITS 100 0 60 1-27-04 3-26-04 '10-24-04 12-22-04 272 1200H COHSTRDLTSDH LIMIT3 90 10 12-25-03 1- 3-04 10-24-03 11-2-03 p 1230 TITLE ORDER 0 0 1-3-04 1-3-04 11-3-03 11-3-03 -62 1-24- - 03 -62 1220 R/p PEE 84 100 0 10-1-03 ISO 1225 PLATS-PRBLIM. S FIBS 0 ISO 1-4-04 6-1-04 11-3-03 3- 31-04 0 9-1-03 10-1- -62 90 1230 R/H pISITT� 25 68 14-28-03 2-3-04 1-24-04 3-24-04 57 I80 1240 DALiTeTIOH ATI()N 0 180 4-11-09 10-7-04 8-29-04 2-24-OS 4-4-03 142 ISO Rom. ESTATE PORC89SR 0 3-50 5-3-04 9-29-04 04 7 -62 24O 1249 FINAL HMRAIMICS DE 0 240 8-31-04 4-27-05 6-30 30-04 2- 24-05 -62 60 1250 ROAD pL�LyS 90 90 6 12-25-03 13-30-03 11-17-04 11-22-04 328 4-20-03 1250 SIGNAL PLANS 30 0 90 1-27-04 4-25-04 9-24-04 12-22-04 241 1254 TRAFFIC CORTROL PLAN 30 50 15 1-27-09 2-10-04 12-9-04 12-23-04 317 5-15-03 1275H PROJdCY TORg ffi 0 30 1-27-04 2-25-04 11-24-04 12-23-04 302 120 PR4HITS 0 0 0 4-2-04 4-25-04 12-24-04 12-29-04 317 1290 45 ASS -_ HDBICIP 25 34 4-36-04 5-29-04 12-23-04 1-25-05 241 45 1294 AGEROMMSOS 0 45 2-26-04 4-10-04 1_4_ 2-17-OS 4-15-03 313 1298H R/1P SPECIAL PRO�O 4S 0 45 2-31-04 3-26-04 1-4-05 2-17-OS 328 1300 P S s g 25 0 0 5-30-05 S-LO-OS 1-5-05 1-5-05 -125 1310 L-.TrIHG 0 25 4-28-05 5-22-05 12-24-04 1-17-OS _125 132OH R/p AC=SITIOH COMP 0 1 6-30-OS 6-30-05 2-25-OS 2-25-05 _125 01 0 0- 9-22-05 9-22-OS 9-22-05 9-22-05 -125 ht1P:J/www-2-dotstate.mn.ns/enpm/techmp/proj&-v/pmu/mdro/lndmhtm 12/4/2O03 -fOIIIC2iiC Desfe: Staudards (T.$. 101) lf� � I Lni'pl) Two Desim Standard: Design of this project wt71 follow MaDCrs XPreservation ()New Camtrnction/Reconstmcdon standards for the above resx=mcod highwayty_m Design Parameters_ Functional Class' () Primi Arterial (X) Mmor Arteaal Terrain_ () Lever M Rolling - ( ) )RougCOR=h Tuaf�c VOln I Current ADT 5900 vehiday g () ROngh (based on () actual cmmts, (x) traffic How uuraa dated 2002) Posted Speed• 40 mph Desist Unit - This project fill be designed in ( ) mPMr units ()Q Fmgjysb �ft, M Existing and Proposed Typical Sections are in the aopcndm (X) Reduced layout is included in appeodia Element Cavacity rr000sea 11V1nDOTStandardit Condition. New Construction/ Design Speed selected for this project is 55 mph. This design speed will be used to look up the values in t table, under the cohmm labeled' MnDOT Standard for New Constnuction/Reconsunctice for. Stopping Sight Distance Horizontal Sight Distance Vertical Alignment K value; Crest and Sag The design speed should fall within the ranges given in Table 2-5.07.6, and should or exceed the posted speed liunit. 12 ft 1 12 ft 1 12 it Right 2A ft Left I NA Right Left PTA NA PIA 9.5 ft Usable 95 ftUmble, 8.0 ft Paved 1 8.0 ft Paved NA NA NA NA NA NA MADO T Road Table 4-4.01A or Table 4-401C Table 4-4.01B Table 9-2-OIA Table 9-2.OIA NA AIInew buidges to have Chapter 9, MS 22-5 (HS-25) Section 9-2 0 DSl-adoc Crinnt iaa Pr000sed il�InDOT SLnndard for Reference Element Condition, Conditon. New Construction/ MnDOT Road Horiwnfal Minimum 5rulimnm Reconstruction I Mann! men Radius No (3zamge No Change 2iimimmmn_--- Table-3-_ Table 3-203B Grades Percent 8%>i� 8°A 6%mammmz Tabk3-0.02A No change Vertiral Alizomen K value CIest 10 M/a mix 10 $PA min. 220 BY% rum. Figum 3- 4.04A Sag 27 ft/% min. 27 fb% lulu. 130 $P/o min. FiEtue 3-4.04D Normal Cross Slone 0.02 Table 4-3.OU Supereievaiion 0.06 maximum C& 3, Section 3-3.0 Ver-desi Clearance Table 9-2.OIB Higbwayffida bridge NA NA 5.0 m (16 ft4 in) Radmad render bridge Nee. NA 7.0 in (23 ft-0 in) estrial held NA NA 53 in (17 ft-4 in) Table Notes An asterisk Preceding proposed condition indicates a Geometric Design Exception See Geometric Design Exception Justification below for additional information. IWersiate/STRAHNLtT stem (Jf) This pmjece does not involve work on the hnersrate/STRAffiVEP system_ ( ) This project involves work on the intersstatei'STRABNET system. ( ) At the completion of this project all bridges will meet the 49 in (16 foot) standard for vertical clearance over Intrastate highways. () At the completion of this project the vortical clearance of the bridge will remain unchanged. The scope of work involves limited repair of the bridge or roadway pavement The Project scope does not provide the opporhmity, to alter the vertical clearance sftab m FHWA will be requested to coordinate with the Depattaxnt of Defense — MTMCIEA at least three months before letting.. Preservation proieets where Premed Critical Elements are less than the New Construction Reconstruction standard: Critical Element --- Location (Ref. Point) Existing / a.�++v..use uu 55 mph Critical secnem OI its IUL. Existing / Existing/ Proposed Critical IIearrmt value Proposed Cortical Proposed Critical Element value Element emmt corresponding corresponding Design Speed Design Speed Stopping 140 $ 550 $ (RD 23 mph 23 m1 AASHTO 23 mph si distance Homontal 546 1042 43 mph �0 Vctical crest 8% 10 ftPA 6% 220 ff!% 40 h 20 h NA 24 mgh Vechcal 27 % ft/ 13O �o h 125 mph TH 101 does not meet the NnDOT Road Design Mannal (RDM) standards for the critical elements listrd_ The horizontal alignment (assumiug 60%superelevation) and grades meet the standards for a 40 mph design spee & The 5mPPm4 sight distance, vertical nest and sag correspond to a 20 mph design spced_ Neuo Tic Engineering examined crashes for the three years 2000 through 2002 They looked at the segment from RP 10.145 to 10377, Plus approximately 500 feet north and sonth of that segment In three yeas, these were 12 cashes. Sis of the Qashess ococmed at the intersection with Pioneer Trail, most of them related to a violation of the traffic control device. The rest of the clashes occurred for various Ii (deer, m, em driver dishactioq &D asleep, emergency vehiclmasons e, e!c)btrt none of thshd a sight as the reason for the crash. ght resniction or grade ` rot — snout SUU feet south of CSAH 14, looking north toward the intersection. TH 101 about 300 feet north of CSAH 14, looking south toward the intersection. Traffic Handy DLrin., Construction - - See Tratur: Forecast section of Project Memorandum. Bicycle and Pedestrian Considerations Accordmg to Minnesota State Bicycle Transportation Plan (Mn/DOT, 1987), this project (4 }�s uatoaal4fajoF 3ic}rcle_Travell�do is on a Major Bicycle Travel Corridor. The Project is on a highway section rated as: ( ) SatisfM actory Yv in need of improvement (see attached) () has an alternative route identified (see attached)_ See Bicycle and Pedestrian Section of Project Memorandmn for additional infonuition- Layout Status: - A geometric layout is not required for this project A level 3 Geometric layout was prepared. Level Projects do not require layouts (and therefore do not require approval). Lae gta._.:1 ` F \s f d A' CITY OF > _ CHANHASSEN PARKLAND A TRAILS/SIDEWALKS Ir -- t N' EXLSMI . TRAIUS26WALX x OVERPASS /V PROPOSED TAAwsn EWAUC ' UNDERPASS • .... i AUNOR ROADS 1 TRAIL HEAD .r l ^ 4 � \N N MA70R ROADS O CITY HALL } / - i26HWA95 t SOi00L /1 . CITY PARIMND '1 MN LANDSCAPE PARK LANDI (] MN LANDSCAPE AR8(HZEi11M - r (] XUFF CREEK GOLF COURSE a Y, Q FEDERAL MN VALLEY NAT. WIlDLLPz RMVGE C STATE WD,DL¢E MMlAGEMENT AREA a..rr f ,J®1 0 11m tyRO ,3po MODr.. 4' B Minnesota Department of Transportation Memo Metropolitan 0ivisicn Office Tel: 651/fi34-2175 Mal Stop o5o Fax 65V502-13W Waters Edge Budding 1500 W. County Road B-2 Roseville, MN. 55113-3174 - Date December 13, 2003 To: Jolene Savadw Metro Traffic Subject S.P. 1009-14 ( T"L 101) — safety of design exceptions along this project. A Design l aception or critical sob -slams ml design element has been located on this ectat the following locations: 1�! Location (mile point)[Ildfical From Tolect Dem Ensh Coudltioa, Minimum Pmnosed MWDOT Standard for New Construction/ Reconstruction Condition. Minimum 10145 10.377ppiv Stght Distance10229 140 R 140 ft 5 0R 10252Grade 10131tical 10 3T7tical Crest (�St r.d 8°t 25 fV% 10 R/%10 27ft1% S% 25ftl°6 R!% 271t!°6 6%10.147 �0 ry"�10.358 220ftf% 130Po% We need to ]mow if tbeae an any crash problems related to these sob-shandard mtl�l demen& We will document yew results m Our PMedM�mo. A sample statement is shown below, "The dukide shoulder width it 24 m (8 ft),1.8 m (Sfr) pave({ from CSAH 12 to pop, (hive (a distance of 2.4 miles). Mir/DOTs New Cons&Uc&on/Beconstrudfon stmtdard ca for the oxwde shoulder width to be 3.0 m (9.8 ft), 24 m (78 ft) paved Accided rewrds were Checked and the narrower shoulders do not appear to be e` usargan accident problem Shoulders will not be widened render arts project" . Plam reply by 12/31103. Thanks Traffic Section Determination: We end crashes for the three yeas 2000 through 2002. We looked at the segment from RP 10.145 to 10377, phis approatmaltiy 500 &et north and south of that segment. In three yeas, there were a total of 12 crashes Six of the crashes occurred at the intcrseclTon with pioneer Trail, most of them related to a violation of the traffic control device, The rest of the crashes occurred for various reasons (deer, driver distraction, fen asleep, emergency velucle, etc), but Done of them listed a sight .. restmcaen or grade as the reason ftn the crash C:�Lc and se��ivelgrppgraot STe�1Dev8n I.dac Geometne Desm Standards (C.S_A H. 14) (form ePa+oai 1Itt �-Vq Desim Standard: Design of CSAH 14 wYIl follow Mumesota State -aid standards at bfmicsota Rule 88209920 - Geode design standards; rural and suburban undivided; new or monstructioupmjec s. DesiguPar2mters Runetional 02ss: () Principal Arterial M Minor Arterial ( ) Collector ' - Terrain: () Lem] M Rolling () Rough Traffic Volume: Ca3xeatADT7500 vehJda3, (based oa ( ) actual counts, () traffic flow man.dated 20M) Posted Soeed- 45 mph Design LtniC This project fill be designed in ( ) metric units () English one. (X) EAstmg and Proposed Typical Sections are in the appendix. M Reduced layout is included in appendix. .-MIX I rrnoosed Minnesota State Element Condition. Condition. standards at .Minimum Minimum MR 88209920 Teed will be used to lookup the vahres in this table, under the column labeled "MuDOT Standard for New Consttuction/Reconshuction- for. Stopping Sight Distance Horizontal Sight Distance Vertical Ahgnment, K value; Crest and Sag The design speed should fall within the ranges given in Table 2-5.07A, and should eaual m p.y, i rti..... e..va I", Ri ht 5-I0ft 8ft 8ft Left NA N.S NA Width Riot � NA NA NA Left NA NA NA 9M 457 ft 457 R 400 ft miu, No Carves No Curves 677 8mm R2dIus Urb= & Rural MnDOT Road Design Manna[ or MR 8820992i1 Table 4AMB Table 9-2.01A Table 9-2.01A DASI-a.doc c-r'mcm Design i' -' ' Element Con I on, N1mimnm Proposed Condition, NERimum %1'mnesota Strte-aid standards at iSig 8820-9920 nDOTReferefP NinDOT goad Design Manual or Grades Percent 16 % maidmmr I26% 5-6 %maw Rmal Talik 3 a D2A - Ver$ca1 honment B No 7-3 aA »m Urban value Crest 157 fi/'/a min NA 157 ffP1, mitL 120 $N/, min,Sag FigM 3-4-04A Normal Cross Slone NA 90&%min. F 3404D 0.02 Table 4-3.OIA S�elevation 0.06 maximum Chaplet 3, - Section3-3-0 Vertical Highway under bridge NA Railroad under bridge NA 5.0 in (16 ft-0 in) Tab9- 9-2.01B NA Highway ander sign or N 7 in (ft-0 in) NA Pedestrian brid 5-3 3 m (17 ft�F in) Table Notes - An asterisk preceding proposed condition indicates a Geometsc Design Exception. Exception h.er:f. atm below for additional infoauation. Other applicable stated sta W=&- - 1:4 minimum insiopes - 30-foot recovery area- The recovery aura is an obstacle -free area (measured from edge of t¢efnc lam) - 10-mn pavement design_ InterstaWSr AHNET system X) This project does not involve workon-thelnicstate/8-T&AF£>Hi'systen� ------------------------ () This project involves work on the Iut��,gNgp system - ( ) At the completion of this project, all bridges will meet the 4.9 in(] 6 foal) standanlfar vertical clearance over Interstate higbways, () At the completion of this project the vertical clearance of the bridge wilt remain =changed- The scope of work involves 1anited repair of the bridge or roadway Pavement- The Project scope does not provide the opportunity to alter the vertical clearance situation- MWA will be requested to coordinate with the Department of Defense-NITMCl'EA at least three months before hating_ Not applicable_ Geametric Des- Ezcention Jnstifraiion Within dw section please justify the design exceptions (if any) noted in the Critical Design Elernentstableabove- RefertoSection2-6.01.01oftheNfnDOTRcadDesignMa>malfar additional guidance on Geometric Design Exceptions. None. Trai3ic HandCm Construction Roadway will be Imp, open during construction. Flagging will be reguned while materials are in or ouL For ceut r culvert replaces we can require doing it X at a time and flag 4a�C�g h. through. 1 Ja �O �`tfATnKN'Q April 17, 2003 GeoffryPreigo MDOT Meto Divi90 1500 West County Rd B2 Roseville, MN 55113 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Road St Paid,h&nnesota 551554010 R& TH 101 blecsection Reconstuotion at Pioneer Tru1(S-P. 1009-14), Natural Resources and Recreational Resources Queshonnauq Carver county Dear Mr. Prelgo: The Minnesota Department ofNamral Resources (DNR) has completed amrevim of the Natural andRecreational Resources Questionnaire for the above-refereiced project located in Section, 25, T116N, R23W m the City of Chanhassen, Carver County Comity. Tbem are very few comments Bunn DNR on ibis project No Public Waters Basins, Wetlands, or Watercourses am directly impacted by this Permitisnotrequired• - projuxt ADNRPnbftcWatersWurk The Mmoesota Natural Heritage database has beer reviewed to determine if my rate plant or animal species or other significant ind ral features are known to occur within an approximate one -mile radius of the TH 101 Intersection Rmonstmetion area 00ched project area Based on this review, there are 23 known oecu¢ences of rare species or natural communities in the nmo ffseathed (for detatis, contact me and I will send database printouts). However, standard constucfion procedures (e.g. prevention) should ensue that these features remain tuaffiected by the proposed activity. Because our information is not based on a comprehensive inventory, there may be rure or otuerwise sign Bern natural featues in the state that are not represented in the datahast. A comity.-by.coumry survey of rare natural features is nowundermy, and has been completed for Carver County. Our information about natural communities is, therefore, quite thorn for that tmt9• However, because survey work for rare plants and awls is less exhaustive, and because fee has not been an on -site survey of all areas of the county, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist on the project area - you for providing the opportunity for early Coordination on this project We have no further comments or concerns at this time. If you have questions regarding this lcthn, please e-mail me at eterleeLe P ednrstate.mauts or call at (651) 297-4313. Sincerely, Peter Fete DNR Tansportation Team Office of Management and Budget Services C- ERDB file 20030756 An Equal Cpporhm@y Erngoyw `A ho Vah.,, Diversity ° o Minnesota Departrrtent of Transportation Transportation Building 3-05 John Ireland Boulevard - •--2t31-A9inFlP�Pt"'3' iA April 16, 2003 Direct Line: (65 1)296-3243 Mail Stop 620 Mr. Dennis - Gimmestad Government Programs & Compliance Officer. Slate Historic Preservation Offic- Minnesota Historical Society 345 Kellogg Blvd W. St. Paul, MN 55101 Re: S.P. 1009-41 CM 101 and Pioneer Road Intersection in Chanhassen, Carver County) T 116N, R 23 W, S 25 SHPO No. Pending Dear Mr. Gimmestad: We have reviewed the above referenced project under the Minnesota Historic Sites Act and the Minnesota Field Archaeology Act The proposed project does not involve federal funds, and it is not Hkely that the District will be applying for federal fiords. It is likely that the project Will require a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The current undertaking consists of upgrading the current 4-leg intersection, with each roadway containing two lanes, to a signalized intersection with right turn, left turn, and through lanes for each of the 4 legs_ Each leg will be widened approximately 15-20 feet at the intersection, and then tapering back to existing over approximately 600 feet from the intersection (please see the enclosed figure). The District will be acquiring new right -of --way as part of this project; however; at this point they are uncertain how much additional right-of-way will be purchased - The area of potential effect (APE) for archaeological resources for the project consists of the proposed construction area; and for arohitecturelhistory, resources consists of the first tier of adjacent properties. There are no properties within the APE that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the State Register of Historic Places. While Mo/Model rates the general area as having high site potential, since the proposed construction area has been impacted by previous construction activities, the area has a low potential for containing intact archaeological resources. It is the opinion of this office that there at-- no properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places or the State Register of Historic Places, and no known or suspected archaeological properties within the area to be affected by the project as currently proposed_ If the project scope changes, we will provide an additional review. We are providing you and. the Office of the State Archaeologist with this information pursuant to the responsibilities Sven the Minnesota Historical Society and the State Archaeologist by Minnesota Statues 138.661 to 138.669 and 13831 to 138.42. Please call if you have any questions concerning this project. - Sincerely, L MIW+'I.ePi, Kristen Zschomler Historian Cultural Resources Unit (CRU) Gregg-lverson Metro Division ._ Mnfb CE -F1e- . Joe Hudak, Mn/DOT CRU"r ---- W, Note : Corrected SP 1009-14 1 1NT` SOTA HISTORICAL. SOCIETY STATE HISTORIC PRESSWATION OFFICE May 23, 2003 Ms. Kristen Zschomier Cultural Resource Unit MN Dept of Transportation Transportation Building, MS 620 395 John Ireland Boulevard SL Paul, MN 55155-1899 RE: S.P. 1009-41, T.H.101 and Pioneer Road Intersection f T116 R23 S25, Chanhassen, Carver County SHPO Number. 2003-2188 Dear W. Zschomler. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the above project It has been reviewed Pursuant to the responsibilities given the Minnesota Historical Society by the Minnesota Historic Sites Act and the Minnesota Feld Archaeology Act Based on our review of the project information, we conclude that there are no properties listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places, and no known or suspected archaeological properties in the area that will be affected by this project Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36CFR800, Procedures of the Advisory Courdl on Historic Preservation for the protection of historic properties. If this project is considered for federal assistance, or requires a federal permit or license it should be submitted to our office with reference to the assisting federal agency. Please contact Dennis Gimmestad at (651) 296-5462 if you have any questions regarding our review of this project Sincerely, Britta L Bloomberg U Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer -:�" Note _ Corrected SP 1009-14 ---------- - -- ----- ����'Orq Mn/DpT a of 'moo EnvironmerTta_i Se•vicas F 395 John Ireland Blvd., MS 620 St Paul, MN ,Sans -1899 Dates 'March 4, 2003 7a Gregg A, Iverson, Transportation SpecmrW, Senior, Metro pistrict From Andrew Nichols, &mrcnmental Assessment Unit Phmm 651-284-3772 PZ : S.P.1009-14, TH 101 at Pioneer Traci in Carver County Contaminated Property Review Staie of Minresom O#;lee Memcrandum After reviewing the nature and location of this project and reviewing the HPDP threshold criteria for canplefing Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, I have determined that a detailed Phase I would not be necessary for this project Prima* because it is not in or near any commercnUindus rial areas A review of MPCA GIS files, the Mn/DOT design plan and WOOT Vdeodog did not identify any sites adlacent to the Project area that could Potentially be impacted by the Project. A review of Minnesota POlkrtion Control Agency (MPCA) geographic information system (G-IS) ties (dated August 2002) was completed to check for arty major (mown contamination sites Jr, the area The GIS fides contain reported centamirapon sites (such as superfu nd, dumps and le Potential contamination sites such as alunderground storage tanks sites) and salvage Yards proper des Where businesses esses uselsiore harrdous chemicals and The review of MPCAGIS be impacted by the proqjecer tfiles did not identity any sites adjacent to the project area that could Potentially Attached is a 'Contaminated Properties' wr te-up that you can adapt for use in the TH 101 Projec Please call it you have questions or would Ike additional information. Cc G. Larson (w/out enc.) awrbk -s- . Llinaesota Deparunent of Transportation Qo Ctfica of emrironn"tal Services 395 Jchn Ireiand Qcule�rare, MS 62o May 16, 2003 Gregg Iverson Metro Division Document Mangement Section RE: SP 1009-14, TH 101 and Pioneer Trail, Intersection work Carver County Dear Mr. Iverson: Fax 651/284-3754 As you have requested 1 have reviewed the effects the above referenced project will have upon Federal Threatened and Endangered (T&E) Species. The project county is within the distribution range of the bald eagle and the Higgins Eye Pearly Mussel, Federal T&E Species. If a Federal agency authorizes, funds, or carries out a proposed action, the responsible Federal agency, or its delegated agent, is required to evaluate whether the proposed action 'may affect' listed species. If it is determined that the action 'may affect" a listed species, then the responsible Federal agency shall request Section 7 consultation with the USFWS. If the consultation shows 'no effect" on the listed species, further consultation is not necessary. According to the information provided by the Natural Heritage Database (updated 1-15-03) maintained by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, there are no known occurrences of Federal T&E Species within the project area. In addition, due to the location and nature of the proposed project, we conclude that the project will not affect Federal T&E Species. If the project is modified or new information becomes available which indicates that fisted species may be affected, please contact this office. This review was completed for Federally Listed T&E Species only. For information on State Listed T&E Species, contact the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Sincerely, �'/ eg gusacker Natural Resource Program Coordinator cc: Gerry Larson Jason Acctt file An equal opportunity emoicyer Minnesota Deaartmeni of Transaortation oMCE OF MMaNyTAL MlaCXs Office Tel: (651) 2843791 Forestry Unit Fax: (651) 284-3754 MS 620 395 John Ireland Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55155 Date: October 30th, 2003 To: Gregg Iverson Transportation Generalist Senior Metro Division From: Paul Voigt 62t NRS / Horticulturist Senior Forestry Unit - Office of Environmental Services Subject: Vegetation Review For S.P. 1009-14 T.H. 101 at C.SA.H. 14 in Chanhassen I am following up on your request for a vegetation review within and around the proposed Koject limits for S.P. 1009-14. Jim Martin (Mn/DOT Metro) and I reviewed the site on October 28 of 2003_ The following are my observations and recommendations for the affected areas in terms of potential impacts to the existing vegetation, what should be done to minimize damage to the trees adjacent to the construction limits, and information that will be pertinent to the project concerning the City of Chanhassen's Conservation Easement within the proposed constructionarea as well as information regarding the City s tree replacement ordinance. General Description of Woody Vegetation The woody vegetation that lies within and near the proposed construction limits of this project is mainly a mbdure of deciduous trees which are part of a naturally occurring `forested" area, but there are some trees (deciduous & coniferous) that were planted as part of a reforestation project by the City of Chanhassen. These trees are planted along the west side of T.H. 101 just north of the intersection of 101 and C.S.A.H. 14. The tree species in this area include the following: e POPLAR 8.0" DBH 1 *RED PINE j V HEIGHT 1 *RED PINE 10' HEIGHT 1 *WHITE PINE 10' HEIGHT 1 -- *WHITE PINE *BLACK 15' HEIGHT 1 HILLS SPRUCE *BLACK T HEIGHT 1 HILLS SPRUCE *BLACK 5' HEIGHT 1 HILLS SPRUCE *BLACK 6' HEIGHT - 1 HILLS SPRUCE T HEIGHT 1 The trees in this area may be on private property, and there may be a need to put a monetary value on these trees and or possibly transplant them to a different location, *These trees may be worthy of transplanting to a different site. The area of vegetatioyn, that will be impacted the most is a wooded area that ties along the west itert#i side of T.H. 101 of C.S.A.H. 14. The trees in this area are a mix of Red Oak, Sugar Maple, Basswood, and a few Aspen along the edge nearest T.H. 101. There are also some patches of shrubs (Gray Dogwood, Staghom Sumac) along the edge nearest T.H. 101. The trees range in size from less than 1" diameter (mostly Sugar Maple) to over 20" in diameter (Red Oak). The understory is fairly clean with the exception of a few stray Buckthorn plants growing along the edge. The species mix in this wooded area is indicative of the "Big Woods", however according to the DNR's Heritage Database, this particular sliver of woods is not classified as a Big Woods remnant. Just south of this area (@ halt mile) there are some Big Woods remnants. The Land in this area is private property. The area that falls into the Conservation Easement will also fall under the CRY of Chanhassen's tree replacement ordinance in terms of MrvDOTs responsibility for tree replacement. The areas that do not fall into the easement area will have to be worked out with the individual property owner in terms of restitution for the tree loss. The Conservation Easement covers the wooded area south of C.SA.H.14 and west of T.H. 101 in a 60' wide band. -1 have attached a map of the area that shows the boundaries of the easement. Impacts / Protection: The impacts to the woody vegetation for this project will occur from the necessary removal of trees on the southwest quadrant of the intersection (approximately 9000 square feet of canopy coverage) and the c trees (listed above located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection (see attached map for locations). It Ynll be very important to have tree protection fence installed along . the Construction limits to avoid any unnecessary damage to trees adjacent to construction activities. As part of the final design process, either a consulting forester, or a member of the O.E.S. Forestry Unit should do a comprehensive Vegetation Protection and Salvage Review (Forestry Plan). This plan should include the following components: • Tree and other woody plant/plant community protection opportunities • Trees and other woody plant transplant opportunities • Timber utilization opportunities • Hazard tree identification It will be very important as part of the construction plan to clearly communicate what will be expected of the Contractor in terms of appropriate treatments for vegetation protection. These treatments must follow what is described in Standard Specifications 2572 and should include but not be limited to: Item No. Item Emit 2572,501 Temporary Pence meter (linear foot). ------2572-502—__Clean_Roef Cut§n --- -- 2572.503 - . �meter{tinear Water liter (gallon) 2572.504 Sandy Loam Pill cubic meter (cubic yard) 2572.505 Prune trees hour or each There may also need to be appropriate special provisions drafted that will detail any work that needs to be done that is not included in the Standard Specifications. These provisions should also detail any Penalties that the Contractor will be resaonsible for it the work is not performed according to the specifications that were laid out in the contract. The Citv of Chanhassen Tree Replacement Ordinance The following outlines the City of Chanhassen's requirements for tree replacement_ Mn/DOT will be required to follow this ordinance for any tree removal that takes place on City Property or within the limits of the Conservation Easement: Sec.20-1178. Generally. (a) It is the policy of the city to preserve natural woodland areas throughout the city and with respect to specific site development to retain as far as practical, substantial tree stands which can be incorporated into the overall landscape plan. (b) No ciearcutting of woodland areas shall be permitted except as approved in a subdivision, planners unit development or site plan application. (c) The standards in City Code section 18-61(d) shall be used in evaluating site plans. (Ord. No. 153, § 1, 11-4-91; Ord. No. 204, § 4, 5-9-94) Sec. 18-61 (10) If any protected significant trees are removed or killed or there is a loss of trees as the result of construction activities, the city requires replacement at the rate of two (2) caliper inches per each inch of DBH of the removed, killed, or lost trees. The replacement trees shall be at least two: and one-half (2 112) inches caliper and will be species that conform to the List of Desirable Tree Species for Planting in Chanhassen. No more than one-third ( 113) of the trees may be from any one (1) tree species. Other species or sizes may be used as replacement trees subject to approval by the city. Alternately, at the city's discretion, if a developer removes trees within a protected area, the canopy coverage area shall be calculated for that area and a replacement area one and one-half (1.5) times the canopy coverage area that was removed shall be planted. One tree shall be planted for each one thousand eighty-nine (1,089) square feet of required replacement area. Trees shall be from the list of desirable tree species, no more than one-third (113) of trees from any one (1) tree species, average two -and -one -half -inch caliper with a minimum one -and -one -half -inch caliper, a similar species as vegetation existing on site, and appropriate to the soil conditions. Any replacement trees that cannot be planted on the original site due to space restrictions shall be planted on city property at locations to be determined by the city. If there are any questions regarding the tree ordinance, or the Conservation Easement, please confect Jill Sinclair Environmental Resource Specialist for the City of Chanhassen aL a 1133. (SU) 297- II there are any questions regarding my comments please feel free to contact me. Also, when final Construction limits are established, I would be available to conduct a more comprehensive Forestry plan and also give recommendations on tree valuations. cc: Geoffrey prelgo Richard Elasky Leo Holm Forestry Unit DErARTMEYi : Mn/DOT - Metro Dizis=aa Golden Palley Office 0"TE : Suly 29. 1992 to : Scott Bradley _ Environmental Services Section Landscaae Unit ) FROM : Glen G. Ellis L�l District Final Design Engineer PHONE :593-8502 ` SUBJECT :Metro Division Landscape Cuideliries 1 . �-s�wsaslaea STATE OF MINNESOTA s fl#tice Memmora.du�i_. I am sending to you a copy of the landscape guidelines which I have been working on for sometime for. the Metro Division. reviewed by the staff, I have had these guidelines and they have indicated that I can distribute these guidelines to personnel in the Metro Division provided it is cleared by Maintenance. I bave reviewed the guidelines with Maintenance and have incorporated their comments. The attached guidelines have been given the o'say by Golden Valley Maintenance after discussion with others in the Pietro Division, It i.s my understanding that it is your intent to use preparing a statewide policy.. If you need any qthis as a basis for uesti these guidelines or ons answered regarding will be if you need further information. please i personnelve me a call. I very shortly, er gdistributing conies Of -these guidelines to a numb Metro Division GC6:dcr Attachment cc: Mike Christensen Glen Ellis iE-.anTidE� CF?AN.,rCni.l: RCN - C`"i a cf E-"Mrm It l £arvicss, FM 124 STATE C'F !v LANES I'A OFFICE MEMORANDUM _.. .- ➢A7E_-._- siUgU5--2rz19,92_ Ta. District Eracreers, /LsiEngineers stant District Engineeo rs and Area Maintenance Engineers Lawrence E. Foote, DirecfO0`4)— " Scott 0Mce,of Environmental Services Bradley, Chief, 6. � v Landscape Unit F` (E12) 286-1637 (612) c 6-5T/2 SUEJECr_ PROPOSED STATEWIDE LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES First of all, "hats Offm to the Metro Division and Glen Elks for the had work and long hours that Went into formulating the language and obtaining the approvals for "Metro DMsion Landscape Guidelines." Glen did an excellent job in this regard- Based upon his coordination with Environmental Servictis staff, we can say the "Metro Division Landscape Guidelines' embody the spirit and substance of a landscape program we continue to advocate statewide. in fact, a proactive landscape program has been advocated by environmental staff within this Department since the it v=os when the Roadside Development Unit did a very good job of implementing and maintaining roadside landscaping, community and state entrances, and wayside rests, spending about 1 Percent of the Department's construction budget It is our recommendation that all Districts adopt, distribute and .utilize These "guidelines" as statewide guidelines in order to make consistent, balanced and vrise decisions In terms of highway landscaping. Scott Bradley will be arranging times with you this fall to discuss your ideas and cencsms related to the landscape program. At that time, Scott would also like to review programmed, recommended and potential landscape projects and activities with you and your staffs for the purposes of developing and maintaining a 5-year activity schedule, cons stent with District and Central Office priorities. SB:jm Cc: D. Durgin R. Dineen P. Hughes W. May R. Hoffman D. Carlson J. Sandahl . R. Pletan W. Crawford M. Robhscn G. Workman A. Schenkel ,erg R. Stehr G. oils ✓ M. Unzie E.S. Unit Chiefs R. Hill J. Relerson Landscape Unit ;z 7"10 DI7ISTON 7-91 Revised 7-92 - - �E<.1�Es oN iaxDS;,aan� t�rr�r-ArTON AV'TT_nPPnR'I'lN7TTFC I ON TRUNK HIMAY- FRWECTS - These guidelines are provided for Metro Division personnel to use in determining appropriate or desirable commitments to local agencies for landscape mitigation and improvement opportunities and to determine appropriate pay items for trunk highway construction projects. These guidelines are provided in order to make consistent, balanced and wise decisions regarding highway corridor improvements and use of trunk Highway construction dollars, and to minimize iz e long term maintenance costs. ' The purpose of these guidelines is to be consistent in the provision of landscaping throughout our Division by their application. Every effort, however, should be made to satisfy local desires consistent with them. - Contact the Landscape Unit, Environmental Services Section for assistance and recommendations in regards to FWDOT's overall landscape program and long range scheduling priorities. These guidelines will consist of the following: (1) All trees and shrubs on proposed trunk highway construction projects will be reviewed by a Mn/DOT forester or landscape architect as soon as the project manager or designer can determine what trees and shrubs are affected by the. layout or design. The forester or landscape architect will provide written recommendations to the project manager or designer for protection, transplanting, or disposition of all affected trees and shrubs- (2) Inmate trees or shrubs are to be protected and left inplace whenever possible. This may require measures to revise the design such as increasing (steepening) slopes slightly, placing temporary fence at tree drip lines or around shrub beds, or prdvi.ding short, ineanensive retaining walls where necessary. trees may reqHigh value uire additional measures such -as clean root cutting and watering. Always keep in mind when making design revisions that safety clear zones, intersection sight lines, maintenance of the roadway. '(including snow and ice operations), and hydraulics are important factors "to consider. The designer will -need-La review projects with the Maintenance Superintendents and Subarea - Supervisors „ �� .... wag .,use—pseFedeaee—in considered, balanced manner aver tree and shrub preservation. (3) Trees and shrubs which are identified as being transplantable should be reused on the project to the extent possible and if excess remains, they should be planted on_other DOT property where needed. Transplanting trees or shrubs to vetland mitigation areas may enhance their habitat value and may be credited to the wetland bank. If there are no areas within the project limits to use transplantable trees, they may be offered first to Maintenance and second to the City after a determination that they are not useable on other Mn/DOT projects. - If they are offered to the City, the costs and the work involved wil be their responsibility. (4) New trees, shrubs and landscaping may be*pravided for trunk highway projects consistent with the latest Mn/DOT Guidelines and Priorities for Landscaping State highways dated March 5., 1991. Landscape projects will normally be done under separate contract in accordance with the Office Memo dated October 10,.1990, from E.E. Ofstead and L.F. McNamara on Programming of Landscape Projects_ Replacement in kind situations may exist when trees or landscaping are located on right of way or within an area to be acquired as an easement or right of way for a trunk highway project. For guidance in these cases, and cases providing landscape enhancement opportunities, see the Highway Project Development Process (Project Managers Handbook) Volume 2B — Vegetation Section. Contact the Landscape unit. Environmental Services Section for farther advice and - ,recommendations. (5). .When right of Vay is needed for a project and trees and shrubs are inplace and on property purchased from a private property owner,�TM ins o , -F t --s those trees and shrubs in temporary easements or partial takings are normally = P the property Owner as part of the right of way.settlement_ Rarely should they be handled as part of a design project, but in some cases that may be necessary. If the right of way.taking is a total taking, then we can consider tree transplanting from that parcel as part of the project. . a} ._...Trze or.sb._-ub.transplanting caused the Ste 100% artic� at,. -- P ip ing width will be paid for 100% by the State. - b) Tree or shrub transplantiao caused by additional width to be raid for IG(I% by the municipality will be paid for 100% by the municipality. _ c) Tree or shrub removal from a project by a municipality shall be paid 100A by the municipality. d) Replacement of trees or shrubs planted by a municipality in an area to be acquired as an easement or right of way will be paid 100% by the State. e) Replacement of trees or shrubs planted by a municipality within the right of -way, or measures to protect inplace trees planted by a municipality within .the right of way, will be paid 100% by the muai-cipality. f) 1f trees and/or shrubs are not considered replacement and are included at the request of the municipality, the State may participate up to 50% if appropriate in accordance with the State Partnership Landscaping Program. -Landscaping planted at the direction of the State for purposes of snow control, glare screen,- crash buffers, wi-Idlif`e-'ffa`pitat-or ancemen o ne highway will be paid for 100% by the State. g) Tree and/or shrub maintenance for those items whose cost are partici-nated in by the municipality shall be the municipality's responsibility. h) Planting of native grasses and wildflowers at the direction of the State will be paid for 100% by the 'State. i) Planting of native grasses and wildflowers initiated by a City will be done by the City by permit and -the installation will be paid 100% by the city. The State may, furnish the seeds with the approves? of the Agzzcnitnral Engineer, Environmental Services Section. Planting of native grasses and wildflowers included in a non-lnterstate 'trtnk highway project as part of a Landscape Partnership may be participated in by the State up to 50%. Na=ntenence in either case shall be the municipality Is responsib±lity. (o) Landscaping may be installed on a trunk highway in�uded sn on y by a City by permit, it may be r` coat;-arr_at t e reques o tne._ ity an pan for by the City with maintenance by the City, or in some cases it may be installed on a non -interstate trunk highway with cost participation of up to 50% by Mn/DOT with maintenance by the -City as part of a Landscape Partnership. All of these situations involve Mn/DOT approval. They may also require concurrence by PFSCME, which will normally, be handled by Environmental Services. (7) The use of wildflowers and native grasses should be considered for use on Projects in rural, and possibly suburban areas. Protecting or transplanting inplace plantings shall also be considered. Native grasses that are available include tall grasses, short grasses that reo_uire no mowing, and salt tolerant �- grasses. Salt tolerant grasses (Mixture 400) may be especially desirable on urban boulevards and adjacent to the shoulder on urban trunk highway projects. (8) Funding for landscaping will vary depending upon the type of project, length of project, -and type and location of the roadway. The .project manager or designer will need to review each proposed project with the Landscape unit to determine either preliminary or more detailed cost estimates for landscaping. (9) It is important that agreement be reached with local agencies regarding maintenance of any new landscaping prior to final commitments being made on its installation. \ Contact the Agricultural Engineer, Environmental Services Section for further C advice and recommendations. 1 Attachments Cost Participation for Landscaping Office Memorandum dated October 10. 1990. on "Programming of Landscape projects* Mn/DOT Guidelines and Priorities for Landscaping State Highways Landscape Project Priorities Mn/DOT Landscape Unit -Intent of Landscaping" Pages D-137-to D-147 of Vegetation Section of "Highway Project Development Process" including; Technical Memorandum 87-5-MV-1 on "Salvaging Plant Material on Construction Projects" Guidelines for Tree Transplanting 7echnic2ll Memorandum 89-20-2g 17 dated May 26. 1989. on "Wildf-lower Programn Partners°bLiD.Landscaping Program -__YO7Zdl03' " 25:'a5=-��' 9522Z71110 October 4, 1994 CITY OF- --- - 1��afi t CITY OF voaz v �• W 6:0 CCULTEH DRIVE a P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ` 317 (612) 937-1900 0 FAX (612) 9375739 Don HaHa ssss •, Chaska. 1 55318 Dear ..1. Tws lem= is 10 formally notify You that on Sq*=b= 26, 1994, the City Co.& approved Plains •ff Y. [isas shown on the PLUM d sled June 6, 1994, subject to the hglawfifg L All areas sl Ynl • N during site gradineifiMll It02e Jr' wYt♦r a flseedand disc-11MIched or wood fiber 1� k. Of «gill• Yf 1 , �. J • 1g. • 1 11 q (13m1• 1. t 1 t• t ,te • l f p r areas II Ytr .r1 [I • w g • use I.i a- wn .1 with sod Or ... .all •••♦{ fiber ♦.r. Ilm applicant shall work with'Ahe City in devcloag a landscaping reforestatiort plan • 1 the site. n ♦ .n shal-I&Iude a list of all ear, proposed to be removed and thdr si� Ile vegetated areasNtich will not be affecAr by the developtnent will be protected by lonseraou easetnent. Thew• 1 N .If • ♦ easernent shall I pmmh r 1 rt\. _ w11.• ! -dead or • s :•vegctation n• tll • :r •: r 1 1 healthy ♦ e.s over • Y. { t;1 1.! 3l .rY. i 1.• r L • Iln�:• t• . :.tfi♦ :•♦ Staffshallprovide • I whichshows.[[ •�•.1 of -the Ya;r 1!t1 •r11 w11 1.• 11' ..• .1• sha { • .! • ♦ 1 u plan shall e. u•- g 1 t - aw proposed <• • w 1 . • .a -3 he plam shall be subrnitted prior to fin -p Kd shallalm•e .rt relates 1• the ! 1 • single, f.rnt r • n=fij th6 souflL r' v •«. 3, shall • 4..us1 graded and 1 . 1 provide 1 ree Pr05C1V3Jiou plan for staff approval q/ K 11 •l 1 , 1 H • p Ipl pem3iLStaff IY.1 haveq /JI torequire a change 11 hm= pad and ••wsnl 1it will - 1 Osavbg •a • the edge of n. 10/28/a3 -16:M RAX 9522271110 t // I b� w\4 Lan es, Voiutnes, Timings 3: Pioneer Trail & TH 101✓c� a23rzooz Lane Conngurations 1deaVFiow.(vphM- 19F)t1 is®0' 1900 1JOo:,:isOtY 1eG0.= . � storage Length (R) 250 198p 490t7 ?#seo i90«f 790s s 196Jo Stor 251 2 25I 261 250 25D 250 age Lanes.. 1'.' .� 1 1,. ,_ . 1 . -. 1 ! Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4-0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Dew-{t) `., � • - 260.1 s 25 25a 9: .gtp:. - 9. • ,. 25: 300' .: 9 TrarTaxt Detector {tt) 5 9 0 5 9 _ _- �- 0 5 0 0 5 Lane U Factor. Frt1 D0 !_q0 �1p.0�0�� 1.OU 1.00 ,(1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00-.;1.00 1.00 .�. .. `.:O�m Fit Protected O 950 `' ta�Y,rm S'aitt-ftw. r, 0 950 0.950 0.950 Fit Perm ed 0.700 " `' {70 81r � 5z fFff1 313 `1 i&83 Sah'Flow 0_ 0.666 0.619 Right Turn on Red Yes Saul. Fia�v,{fTtlF1j-'r . 13 _'_ Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor t 00_ l.00 L 1-13 .00 1.00 `` 100 1 y f.00 + 1 00 1.00 1001 IAp 10.0 [.rote Distance(TOt fi 11� 3x" R,:': ' L G• j.: <. jam" =yn..`"' :> + -. TI,_e "'-'•-._y..-r. i173 T"1122 1123 ,. Volume (`Rh) 18 624 13 .3k1<= _ss1: 37 88 42 10 55 75 143 13 - - J _rww vpnj - - a8- - 624- f N f"1 _ -M-- -42 -T0 13 n Venn Perm Perm Perm Penn P erm :.!iOv".`--- -'' ,''.•,t?- _6'%.'.; 4 88 2-2 6 u.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 16.0 9.0 29.0 29.6 29.0 29.0 3.5 23-5 - - - - 23.5 - 23.5 �I2�9,O.0� 23.5 23.5 n. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 x� 1 0 n' 15.0 15.0 15.0 16.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.6 21.0 None None None tAtme None MN Mm ~Min Mm Aft fM� pNon/e{ yq Flash Dont Walk (s) ti 0 11 0 11.0 17.0 QEtC=SC<ld'[y..•"'F._-, ®r�a�s.,Q:-.'�"s,.':UEv...Y•:: (5) 20.9 11 0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Si_ , r._. 2D.9 209 26.9 209 209 16.4 6.4 16.4 164 16A� 76.4 v!c Ratio0.03.- "0 73 0jy0�2 0T7 S 010 ,,(j�� 0.06 0.02 .�0j-3311 0 09 0.18 027 0.02 t Delay 63 10.1 3.7 72 8 6 27 112 122 4.4 120 11.9 6.5 Approach Delay 8.9 1 - ..... z.: = - . K i►E 1 _13 _B_ _-- .: { � 10.6 11 7 TH 101 at P7oneer Trad& M Pm 8i912002 Baseline Pat D. Otto mkInesM7-ea51 Synehro 5 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, - irnings 3: Pioneer Trail & TH 101 Queue gth SOfh (tf) 2 117 0 5 12 0 2 42 0 13 g" Infernal cnlc Dist ft 1077 1093 Aft �/ giodc' a '�'I aN4 Y'*s.-. �'�i � `':;_ = 1043 ys SOth Bay Bieck Tare % �.�:.. �,.. � .ti,"�...� ..�'` �@ _ _��,• ��$ Queuing Penalty (veh) � �e aOther - ACtrared - _:— {.yde Length. 45.4 f'i1F2,.r ; �� =_•fir m-; N. - Control TYPe- Actuafed-Unfit and Phases: 3: Pioneer Tra18 TH 1U1 3 s ri 101 at Pioneer Trait AM 5:00 pm 3/9/2002 Baseline Pat D_ Otto SPIchro 5 Report minneslvW-al Page 2 ECS2000: Dnsi , -'- - - _gna_ized _intersections Re3ease 4.1 Phone: E-Mail: Fax: ALT ---WAY STOP CONTROL (AWSC) AA ALYSSS Analyst: JJM Agency/Co•= Date Performed: Mn/DOT Traffic Engineering 7/17/2002 Analysis Time Period: IN Intersection: Jurisdiction: TEi 101 at Pioneer Trail Mn/DO Analysis Year: 2002 Project ID: TH 101 AT CSAH 14 East/West,Street: CSAH 14 North/South Street: Td 101 Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics Eastbound L T Westbound Northbound Scuhbound R L T R 1Y() L T R L T R Volume 18 624 13 's Thrus Left Lane 37 88 42 206 55 75 143 13 Eastbound Westbound L1 Northbound Southbound L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 figuration LTR Con I Flow Rate 0.96 0.92 LTR 0.85 LTR 0.72 681 s Heavy Veh 2 180 317 320 No. Lanes 2 2 21 Opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry1 group 1 1 1 Duration, T--- 1.00 hrs. 1 1 1 ,• �Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Flow Rates: Total in Lane Left -Turn. Right -Turn Prop. Left -Turns Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 681 180 317 320 18 ' 40 11 104 13 - 45 64 18 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 . 0, _ . Eezvy Veh_0...3 cleo.0 - 0.2 - 0.1 fPMetry Group 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 �'a3ustments Table 10-40: hLT-adj hRT-adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 -0.2 0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hadj, co mpitited 0.0 �7 z Worksheet a _ Departure Headway and Service Time Eastboumd Westbound Northbound Flow rate L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 hd, Initial value 3.20 3.20 3-20 3.20 x, initial 0.61 0.16 3.20 3.20 hd, final value 6.98 8.00 0.28 x, final value 1.32 0.40 7.52 Move -up timm e, 2.0 0 66 Service Time 5.0 2 0 2.0 6.0 5.5 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound L1 L2 Ll L2 Ll L2 Flow Rate 681 Service Time 6.0 0 317 Utilization, x 1.32 5.5 Dep. headway, hd 6.98 0.40 0.66 Capacity 1 8 00 7.52 Delay 613.16 409 16.29 464 LOS F, 24.92 Approach- C. C Delay Los613.16 16.29 24.92 .Intersection Delay 291..61 C C Intersection Los,V1 7!. x i 0.2 -0.6 -r. T- 0.1 Southbound L1 L2 32,0 3.20 3.20 0.28 7.64 0.68 2.0 5.6 Southbound L1 L2 320 5:6 0.68 T.64 458 26.37 D 26.37 D l�'-z-x=il'1ESOTA 17EPAR 1Y3Eli 1 OF iiiANT SPOR Al O SIGNAL JUSTIFICATION REPORT for S.P.1009-14 TJL 101 at CSAH 14/pioneer Trail In Chanhassen, Carver County Program: SC (safety Capacity) Funding: SF (State Funds) LF (Local Funds) Letting Date: February 25, 2005 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duty Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of l4imiesota. ar� 25043 mpo,a, P_E. No. Date AEVIEWED: -7 7 d¢ Date 1 Date: May 24, 2004 S.P. 1009-14 (T.H. 101) T.H. 101 at CSAH 14/PioneerTrail In Chanhassen, Carver County I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project consists of installation of a traffic control signal system at the intersection of Trunk Highway 101(T.H. 101) and CSAH 14,Pioneer Trail in the City of Chanhassm The new signal system will be full-trafficactuated with overhead mast arm mounted indications_ LED lenses will be installed for all vehicle signal indications facing each approach. Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) detectors and indicator lights will also be installed as part of the new signal system. The 2000 population for the City of Chanhassen is 20,321. T.H. 101 is a two lane undivided north -south highway at the project location. It is classified as a minor arterial and has a posted speed limit of 40 mph. T_I% 101 currently has no tun lanes in either direction at the intersection with CSAH 14/Pioneer Trail. The AADT (2002) on T.H_ 101 is 3,500 south of the intersection and 4,500 north of the intersection. CSAH 14/Pioneer Trail is a two lane undivided east -west County State Aid Highway in the City of Chanhassen in Carver County. At the intersection with T.H.101, the CSAH 14 westbound approach has only a right turn lane while the eastbound approach has no turn lanes. (See existing geometrics in the appendix). The posted speed limit on CSAH 14/Pioneer Trail is 45 mph and the AADT (2002) is 7,500 east of T. H. 101 and 5,706 to the west of this location. This intersection is currently controlled by stop signs on all four approaches_ II. SCIIEDULE AND PROJECT MANAGER Project manager. Mince Gerbensky Signal Design Project Manager 1500 W Co. Rd. B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Telephone number. (651) 634-2394 Estimated letting date: Feb. 25, 2005 2 III. NEED FOR PROJECTIPROJECT DISCUSSION This project will install a new traffic control signal system at this location. The installation of this signal is part of a safety capacity project to improve and upgrade this intersection by adding both left and right turn lanes to each approach. With the installation of the traffic signal, the existing "right angle" crashes should be m;n;mied and also with.the additional tam lanes the capacity will be increased thus reducing the extensive queues and long delays that occur daily at this intersection during the peak hours. (See crash diagrams in the appendix). The overall operation of this intersection should be greatly enhanced with these improvements. IV. PUBLIC AND AGENCY EWOLVF31ENT The City of Chanhassen, Carver County and Mn/DOT will be required to coordinate finding for the Signal system and enter a maintenance agreement with Mn/DOT. V. DESIGN CRITERIA AND EXCEPTIONS V1. JUSTIFICATION Justification of this signal system was studied with respect to the warrants outlined in the M -TCD. A signal warrant analysis was done using 43-hour counts taken in December, 2001. The traffic volume at the intersection of TJ 1 101 at CSAH 14/Pioneer Trail satisfies the requirements of warrant 2 and warrant 7 (crasb/volume) is also meL The traffic signal installation for this intersection is justified and in the best interest of the driving public. See attached signal wawmt analysis and collision diagrams in the appendix. A. Project ... Existing Georrietrics ProposedB. D. Signal Warrmt Analysis Collision Diagram VE. APPENIDLX 9 m THBNi Y A CT. �2 R c S ^ �- y Rim CT_ Q O ?It 4" C +� aY ' M. {29. *PT� UJ' �• ur [WE OAIIAT ems! COVE ¢ F f C `� i G, y 3' 10 IM ULIAYW[R 111. �b TOR COVE . 3' Ty4 ua .. U&nnalycr o XaR F PROJECT LOCATION pv.y z \ Ifi PLRl1M1 VAT 1Lzu QI l Fla 1ffi Ii1m1VffY mt CHANHASSEN `— 2000 POP. 20,321 %� to r u PROJECT LOCATION T.F{. 101 @PIONEER TP,AIL ©s `COS n� CHANHASSEN,MINNESOTA >zc. PR6i}IE PRE u :DEN PRAMM 2000 POP. 54,901 1 tW a mm�E Pr. QL TEmiEs R- ' Qz nmRcll u rn. RNc W u - Q-1. ROGAS RO. ur. mnuE uT �lh NORIIBl1 LRiRS lSL iQgYN WAY l'i2 RI.160tt CT. EDEN PRAIRIE _ 2000 POP, 54,901 6 / ota �1 SHAKOPEE 2000 POP. 20,568 CSAH 14/PIONEER TR F- EXISTING GEOMETRICS ° T.H. 101 @ PIONEER:TRAIL y�p rPAMIJACCCAt 11TMklUCnTl �♦ I I I I I I I l x 1 1 1 ( 1 I I 1 j 1 CSAH 14/PIONEER TR 0 i luff m CSAH 14/PIONEER TR Is F PROPOSED GEOMETRICS ,.�E_�,, T.H. 101 @ PIONEER TRAIL 1 CHANRASUN. MTNNT=cnrA � _'' AH 14/PIONEER TR MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOCATIOM CSAHT4A-T.TH j(), COU?41y* CA-RVER REF. POINT., 10.381 DATE:: OPERATOR::h" 0.70 FACTOR USED,, POPULATION < 10,000? EXISTING SIGNAL ? THRESHOLDS I All A- METRO DIVISION -TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS MaI0rAPP1: CSM14EB :'2 MPiOrAppl. mCSAH,14.WB. 2 MkmrApp2, TH1jaj. No 2 `_Minor ApIA- TH IS3 HOUR MAJOR APP, 1 MAJOR APP. 3 TOTAL 1+3 MAJOR. 1A11B --al—NOR APP. 2 -MwCR2 1At1B 140f70 --W]—NC—R JAWO -�jj—NOR4 MET S AM 0:00 - 1.00 31 APP. 4 1A11B 1A11B 1:00 - zoo 15 2:00 - 3:00 3:00 4:00 4 1 1 - 4.,00-5.00 -'31*Y'&'64vv 15 I I 55 243 1 6-'00 - T00 Z, xrx IX10aft743 8:0G005� 25 fX Ix 8:00 - no 227 20 123 471 XIX —� n259*v xxXIX — -- 9:00 -10:00 !� XI 2g� XfX QW262'% xi122 10:00 -11:00 251 275 - XIX I 11:00 -12:00 rlFs 324 D( I 12:00 -13:00 �-'-7�4437,Q4 �-yBW A�fl 5 /X Ix I 13-00 -14:00 7 59 /x �UZM46*,!g 1 14-00 - 1-,;-nn 7.9 425 XJX 15:00 -1 s:oo 42r. 632 X1 /x 16:00 -17:00 852 17:00 -18:00 904 —x1x -19:00 =428-X= 5571 r--224�- )/X �ft-3641-� XIX18:00 "0 - 20 X1— %XJX -272',W xfx x/ -21-00 Ix 1-1'-1494!'�20-00 21:00 - 22700195 04:4,� /X �vu - 43:00 21� 150 40:VU 58 Met (Hr) Reouirad tH-ri jr warrant 1A Warrant 1 B 6 8 Not satisfied Warrant 2 5 7 8 Not satisfied Warrant 3 3 4 1 Satisfied Satisfied Warrant 7 8 8 Satisfied, check accident record LOCATION: CSAH 14 AT TH 101 COUNTY: CARVER REF. POINT: 10261 DATE 1211712001 OPERATOR: MAR 0.70 FACTOR USED? YES POPULATION < 10,000? No EXISTING SIGNAL ? No m E 60( > a 50C a? y = 4ac . n m o 300 m CL Z5 a q Q 200 o` 100 45 Major Appt: CSAH 14 EH -- 2 45 Major App3: CSAH 14 W8 2 40 Minor App2 TH 101 NB 2 40 Mir>cr App4: TH 101 SB 9 Warrant 2, Four-hour Volumes — — Warrant 3, Peak -hour Volumes ! Actual Hourly Count 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Major Street -Total of Both Approaches - VPH . ryw c .. r w riOw an0 Peak Hour Warrant AnafyS Note: For data points outside the graph range, check the n7morsfreet volume against the Arwertluesholds warraa criteria MaPx Warara2.1 Warrant 200 420 300 50 500 400 2a5 435 500 230 370 600 175 315 700 135, 250 800 103 215 900 80 175 10o0 80 140 1100 80 115 1200 80 100 13W 80 100 1400 80 100 1500 80 100 1600 80 100 1700 80 100 1800 80 100 AeWW harry Casa Major Actual HaniyCowa 31 44 15 16 13 23 15 7 55 14 243 41 743 125 723 259 471 297 251 200 Z75 121 324 118 323 146 W9 142 425 137 632 265 852 329 904 364 . 557 272 309 149 Z74 104 221 67 150 55 58 37 Mn/DOT 2942 frev 9-11-92) Collision Diagram Minnesota Department of Transportation Location: C_S 1009 TH 101 e Pionppr Tr, m Q11261 Tjme Period: 1/01/99 - 12/31/99 Date: ll/15/oi No, of Crashes Prepared By: J.Dahike Fatal= A Injury= ' B Injury C Injury - Injury Total = North Property Darm Total Crashes= g / //99 (07 -0 g 6/07/a9 (06) C 30")-C-D 9/14/99 (14) L-R-W 9/24/99 (d)L-C-D 4E-4 Motor vehicle Backing Up Details [11 • 1121 -13 o Motor Vehicle Out of Control UncIear (31 —� Yotar Vehicle Ahem Pedestrion Lfight: ❑ Fixed object D � Bicycie/MDped L- Daylight ()) Fatal- Crash Motorcycle DN= Darn fzl DU- Dusk (3) OO A Injury Crash Rom- DI= Dark. Lighted (4) �� DO- Dark, Lights Off �. B Injury Crash Property Damage D= Dark, Unlighted Is) ©_ C Injury' Crash _ X, Unkrwcr lam) C- Clear or Cloudy () or 2) R- Rain (3) Sc Snow or Sleet (4 or S) F= Fag. Smog, Saoke (6) 8= Blowing Sand/Draf (T) r=. Severe frassWindS (B) X= Other or Unknortr 199) i) [i' Sarface: D=Dry M 11= Ilet (2) S= Sr" or Ice (3 or 41 M- Ibddy (S) fb=Debris (6) D=Ofiy (7) X = Other or Unknown (99 ) Right Angfe o,r Q. Property Daw4e Crash 8 Injury. a,• � e Y< lie MNDOT 2942 (rev 9-I1-92) Collision Diagram , Minnesota Department of Transportation LOCat10n:_ C.S. 1009 MNTH 101 93 PTONFFR TRATI R P 10+009t~) Time Period: 1/01/00 - 12/31/00 Date- 11/15/01 NO. of Crashes Prepared BY.--.J. Dahlke Fatal = 0 A Inju= 0 y B Injury- 0 C lnjkry= 0 O Injury Total= p North x Property Damage= 3 ~ Total Z Crashes= 3 PIONEER TRAIL 6/ 5700 l 6) L-C-O 5/ 4/00 (10) -C-D r Motor Vehicle Backing Up , Details [I] ALL WAY STOP [21 -aaai Moto- Vehicle Out of Control UlcI ear [31 —� Motor Vehicle Aheod Pedestrian L fight: Weather: Surface+ 0 Fixed Object B d5 Bi cY cle/Moped L- Doyl ight III C= Clear or cloudy t1 or 21 D= Dry l I) 41 Fatal Crash N ibtorcyc le DN= Don fz) OI= Risk f3) R- Rain (31 S- Snow or Sleet ( 4 or 5) l= 1[et (2) S= SMV or Ica (3 or 4 ) ® A Injury Crash Rear End Ol Dark. Lighted (4) F- Fog. Sang, Smoke (6) M- Woody 151 ® 8 Inj[ry Crash - PropertY DOmoge Do- Dark. Lights Off, (5) p= Dark, _Unl lghted (a) B= BloVing Sand/Dust (71 w=:Severe Crosswinds (a) Db= Debris 16) D- Oily (7) ©. C Injury )�Y ��'� � Right Angle X= lnikrlovn f 991 X = Other or UNttlown t 991 X = Other or Unknown ( 99 ) ;;-O Tr2942 (rev 9-11 -92) 1 . Collision Diagram Minnesota Department of Transportation Location:_ C.S. 1009 MNTH 101 12 PIONFFR TR,&TL R P 10 •00 51 Time Period: 1/01/01 - 12/3111/01 Date: 05/21/02 No. of Crashes Prepared By: J. Dahtt<e Fatal=A Injury= B Injury= C injury= o_ Injury Total= North = Property Domag )— Total Crashes= z PIONEER TRAIL / 4/27/01 (15) L-C-D (3 C / 8/0 tl) -C-D 2/06/01 (18) DU-C-D %-4 Motor Vehicle Boaing Up Details [)1 ALL WAY STOP * [21 ,0� Motor Vehicle Cut of Control Unclear [31 N on —7 !b#err Yehlcle Ahead ^ Pedestrian Lights Weather: Surface: ❑ Fixed Object O Bicycle/Yoped L- Day ight 11) C= Clear or Cloudy 11 or 2) D= Dry (1) 011= Down (2) R. Rain (3) 7= Wet (2) � Fatal Crash Motorcycle lkj= Dusk (3) S. Slow or Sleet (+or sl S= $rqw or Ice (3 or 4) A Q A DI= Dark. Lighted (4) F= Fog. Smog. Smoke W M= Addy (5) Injury Crash Rear End Do- Dock, Lights Off IS) B= Blowing Sa l/Oust (7) Oh= Debris Is) ©. B Injury Crash - - Property. O=XP0= Dark. thl ighted Isl i= Severe Crosswinds (a) 0- Oily (7) © C Injury u*rvm (99) X- Other or (YWnowa 1991 %= Other or UNuo+n (99) Crash —V Right Angle I,..� 2942 (rev 9-11-92) - Collision Diagram Minnesota Department of Transportation Location: C.S )O0,3 MNTH LQ1 9a PTONFFR TRAT) R.P. 1 00 7f;i Time Period 2002 Date: 9/15/03 Prepared By:. MPK (L' North x F Z 9/25/0 (5) -R-W 1/02/02 (14) 1 -C-D r 1/17/02 (OT) 1 --n ^ N` �-] Motor Vehicle Bock ing Up Details aaa� Motor Vehicle out of Control Unclear NOTES [)]_ALL WAY STOP 121 [31 No. of Crashes Fatal= 0 A Injury= 0 B Injury= 0 C Injuy= 0 Injury Total= 0 , r, uvc i y vU nage = t) Total Crashes= 5 PIONEER TRAIL -i Motor Vehicle Ahead 3 .•ill pedestrian L ight. Weather: ❑ Fixed ODj ect Bicycle/Moped L- Dayl ight (t) C- Clear or Cloudy ( 1 or 2) �* Fatal Crash Y )btorcycie Dm= Down (2) 06- Dusk 13) R- Rain (3) S= Snow or Sleet (4 or 53 A o A Injury Crash - Rear End -DI= Dark. Lighted (4) F= Fog, Smog. Spoke is) ,B,Injury Crash Property Damcge DO- Dark. Lights Off is) D- Dark, Uniighted (61 8=-Blowing Saxt/O,sst 17) t= Severe Crosswinds (e) © C Injury Crash - .. X= Unknown-(99) - X= Other or Unknawu (99) Right Angle �,_ ^ Surfocen O= Dry Ill ■= Ret (2) S= Snow Or Ice (3 ar 4 ) !i= A)ddy (5) Dh=Debris (6) 0- Oily 17) X= Other or Unknown (99) CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION APPLICANT: utrVGY ( RL.1011G I4IOJ kS ADDRESS:_1I7jIaD HWy 2.12 W Gtb 14f MN 55322. TELEPHONE (Day Time) q52- 41& — 52D6 ' JWP�h erW& I . `.5 Ar OWNER: udrd2Y- &'Ll L-W El i c Works ADDRESS: _11-5b b v4y 2.12 �'�loav� . M�l 5532z TELEPHONE: 5152- y II96— Sat 15 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Interim Use Permit Variance Non -conforming Use Permit �/ X Wetland Alteration Permit Planned Unit Development* Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Notification Sign Site Plan Review* X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** - $50 CUP/SPR/VAC/VARIWAP/Metes & Bounds - $400 Minor SUB Subdivision* TOTAL FEE $ �JZ rJ. ca Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application -OR- the City can provide this list (Carver County properties iT�lOAA ��lOonal fee to be invoiced to the applicant. RECEIVED If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this box ❑ DEC 2 9 2004 Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEP' *Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an S'/=" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet. **Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME: S.P. I00 `j — LOCATION: ZyIkeYSOGi10n 0V C.S.A-H. 14 and Tt{, Iol LEGAL DESCRIPTION: _F T.D. 25 0255 300 T 25 0 253) O TOTAL ACREAGE: D, 1 Acres oar We+land lrApdc+ed WETLANDS PRESENT: PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: _X YES NO PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: vesiderliiQ,l REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: LOYJ De-gs1i� Res1d&&al REASON FOR REQUEST: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the speck ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature of AKplicant Signature of Fee Owner Application Received on Fee Paid 1,:Z/� ]/C7 Date / Date Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Thursday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. C:\Documents and Settings\jwenko\Local SettingsUemporary Internet FilesNOLK9\Development Review Application.DOC