The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-08_FRETHAM 19TH ADDITIONPRELIMINARY PLANS FOR: FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MN PROJECT DIRECTORY OWNER: LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT CURT FRETHAM 14525 HIGHWAY 7 SUITE 335 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 PH. 952.930.3000 EMAIL: CURTFOLWESTDEV.COM SCANNED CINOFCHANHASSEi RECEIVED AUG 15 ?O14 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT ENGINEER: CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. MARTY CAMPION 1800 PIONEER CREEK CENTER MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55364 PH. 763.479.5172 EMAIL: MCAMPION®CAMPIONENG.COM SURVEYOR: ACRE LAND SURVEYING 9140 BALTIMORE STREET NE SUIT 100, BLANE, MN 55449 PH. 763-238-6278 EMAIL: JS.ACRELANDSURVEY®GMAIL_.COM PROJECT LOCATION IVERNING SPECIFICATIONS: THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" LATEST EDITION & SUPPLEMENTS. CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS. (LATEST EDITION) ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND ORDINANCE WILL BE COMPLIED WITH IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. INDEX 0 30 60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION COVER SHEET 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT PRELIMINARY GRADING 5 PRELIMINARY STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN 6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 01 23 14 MLH I LOT CONFIGURATION N • Civil Engineering • Land Planning I hereby certify that this plan, specification PROJECT NO: 2 06 16 14 MLH ADDED RAIN GARDENS CAM P I O N or report has been prepared by me or FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION 1800 Pioneer Creek Center, under my direct supervision and that I� 13-®50 ENGINEERING P.O. le Plan, MN 55359 ox 249 I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT COVER SHEET SERVICES, INC. Phone: 763-479-5172 under the laws of the State of Minnesota. NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION Fax: 763-479-4242 (� C DATE: REVISIONS E—Mall: mcompionOcompioneng.com Martin P_Campion —Lic. # 19901 Date: CHANHASSEN, MN SHEET NO. . 1 OF 6 SHEETS 01 /03/2014 TOTAL AREA = 1.51 ACRES 65,701.6 SF EXISTING HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS EXISTING CONCRETE - 1469.5 SF EXISTING GRAVEL - 12171.5 SF EXISTING HOUSE - 1812.2 SF EXISTING BUILDING - 2883.7 SF EXISTING SHED - 89.6 SF TOTAL EXISTING = 18,426.5 SF (28.05%) PROPOSED HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS LOT 1 - 3587 SF LOT 2 - 3522 SF LOT 3 - 3199 SF LOT 4 - 3585 SF OUTLOT A - 1901 SF OUTLOT B - 2191 SF TOTAL PROPOSED = 17,985 SF BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT END OF CUL-DA-SAC OF BRETTON WAY. ELEVATION = 982.67 I I v I I V I I Iv I V I i V ��' J) 4 42., � 1 msnnc Nwg Ijjj � ^f • p V 1 F �^� yytr.'� O 3 � � j ��• I t o¢ -l+ O • //i.,,/! ':fit\, 3d: S8i'02'13 s 3M42 v f"��;.• .it•i:rA.tt. h +i+N W:•_� �. Ems.luc Nwx 0��tjt _W »; ''a;Sy�...rt'esr. ."time t�l •• ej� �. _-swi��4 i��M1w;X, f o! g -� �.,� • �� 9a�¢ YlOt-' e+1'PF` .ri'f>. V I ."",.,... r iir ,wr..+4•c f ..•({1f':w. S w Yr1 ��• r. dy - �w t - V \ ,\,.. �$nsN1. " '� ��t ��r,��ial l..yth•T=�w.. `f?'• i =.� •1S �,x• xx� L.S. NO.� I--~-~ I' J . wuNunxx2 '" wutiexe V \ 4 4 � i602 R. S. NO. 105 II T a.ivxe.xw 20.78 \ 2 • �RooE ; �ci.�q tQ_, �•+r M%•w ice; Eufte V �v4/ • ftwa!`G,'O'r'°�f�,'i.A,ty��%L•Y°ns.•Y'�� a L yi}+. °t..►rt wow �'j94,Y <tii fIffliffillffIl a _ "'Q4' b e r ;f�hf�,,y.�": ,,fi�t:1� a,P,g�y1;f� �ty„wwl• 24::.. �. "• y' e RIM-1000.51 > > N _ `-...._+t`.r•-J'..hS<4a!4'�°('��:M.+,Y•rt, �vf1 h��.i`S"^!;'.,•�,.'�'..1 S�,Y .S INV=98T41 Gv > % -�. • • .h°•��IYdi t\f a'r•.5�lL t1f'he . d''�•fT•.d t° »y.:n f "' > > ow.'„ j,,�N�..._A.�l/(w V eN `'t�.,�it..-`+t^Tr 1" 4!"+4y'Z.'••. I RIM994.09 t•T^� q••. e �•�q ty i l } ,•..y ' • • - INV -90299 • , ° a� �,� � d •• i.IPf e i.�a �S� \.ds '.k •$.• w y Y 4' { '� - G \ `.or _ a t. ° .:$.»°@ ," z , e Y c r Doc Na 15149 MVs ---s 10. 105 E%SnHG BGKGING lDVF4 ROM=9B¢9 SLOOP=901.3 �doo � r _ eoxEEOErsitxx r(JJjJ(/ 1 Mt♦ I � 2 w a%qqq4 NIS �L� f qti 1 t 11h"r3,�. 3 • ....... 97923 0 T C \ A\ Ile C RRY FAR 2ND ADD t ell \ S 6, ••r•°r� 9 13% '�.,�_ : '• TREE INVENTORY »rasa. ��`• •� TREE#f SPECIES INCH SAVE/REMOVEfOFF-SITE/COMMENTS fF10,i'f3, DIA R'N=904.9e -55039 5 S 1 OAK 38 REMOVE \ INV=9)150 .n R-50.00 i�]1l 2 ASH 34 REMOVE 48.58 3 WALNUT z-iz REMOVE I � Ai� - 4 WAIN UT 16 REMOVE 5 ELM 18 REMOVE 6 ELM 4-11 REMOVE RIN=980.39 INV=987.49 7 MAPLE 2-SS REMOVE % 8 ELM 3-13 REMOVE / -9 ASH 10 REMOVE LEGEND \ 10 ELM 2-20 REMOVE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 11 ASH 13 12 ELM 14 REMOVE' REMOVE DENOTES EXISTING TREE X DENOTES EXISTING TREE SB DENOTES SOIL BORING Parcel 1: \ / 13 BOX ELDER 2-14 SAVE TO BE REMOVED El DENOTES CATCH BASIN Tract C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 105, flies of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. ( / 14 BOX ELDER 211 SAVE Os DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE Torrens Property O.. R.S. \ > 15 BOX ELDER 15 SAVE - one1x, DENOTES POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES Torrens Certificate 85 ate No. 184.0. CB4.65WVE - X DENOTES FENCE Parcel 2: 1 Replacement Requirements: - TOTAL SITE AREA L51 AC DENOTES GRAVEL Outlots Canal D, CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION, according to the, recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. _ EXISTING TREE CANOPY 0.4 AC (15 X 10895F) 0 DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE Torrens Property Torrens Ce rtlflcate No. 19182.0. I BASE LINE COVERAGE 25% DENOTES GRAVEL REQ'D MIN POST DEV COVERAGE 30% Parcel 3: I DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS (2' INTERVAL) That part of Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 28, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: POST DEV TREE CANOPY 0.1 AC (3 X 1,089) x 952-36 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION / POST DEV TREE COVERAGE -i-I DENOTES WATERMAIN Commencing at the Northeast comer of Bald tract thence due South -along EastTine of sakl�'ract-l-97t74 feet- thence -Beath $B - - - .9% degrees 4 minutes West 376.7 feet; thence South 1 degree 56 minutes East, 65.33 feet to actual point of beginning of tract of lane N > > DENOTES SANITARY SEWER to be described; thence North 1 degree 56 minutes West 51.33 feet; thence South 88 degrees 4 minutes West, 101.74 feet; thence / REQ'D CANOPY REPACEMENT >>- DENOTES STORM SEWER North 77 degrees 44 minutes West, 60.97 feet; thence North 67 degrees 44 minutes West, 66.07 feet; thence North 85 degrees 14 3 288 SF 30% ( 25% )1.51 minutes West, 35.67 feet to the West line of said tract; thence southerly along said West line 24.71 feet to an Intersection with a line bearing North 48 degrees 15 minutes West from a point bearing North 89 degrees 19 minutes West, 190.50 feet from actual 15,786 SF (25%-5%) X 1.51 X 1.2 point of beginning; thence South 15 minutes East, 92.88 feet to said point bearing North 89 degrees 19 minutes East, 190.5 feet to actual point of beginning. TOTAL 19,074 SF NOTES: Torrens Property -- 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS/BOUNDARY SURVEY Torrens Certificate No. 27468.0. REQ D NUMBER OF TREES 18 TREES (18 X 1,089 =19,602 SF) PREPARED BY ACRE LAND SURVEYING. Parcel 4: NOTES 2. ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS AND Tract A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 105, flies of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. 1. TREE INVENTORY COMPLETED BY ACRE LAND SURVEYING 0 30 60 CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 01 23 14 MLH LOT CONFIGURAl1 • Civil Engineering • Land PlanningI N hereby certify that this plan, specification has been by FR E THA M 19 TH ADDITION PROJECT NO: ADDED RAIN GARDENS CA M P I O N or report prepared me or EXISTING CONDITIONS 2 os 16 14 MLH 1 Soo Pioneer Creek Center, P.O. Box ter under my direct supervision and that 13-050 ENGINEERING Maple Plain, MN 55359 1 am a duly licensed Professional Engineer the laws the State Minnesota. LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT & REMOVAL PLAN SERVICES INC. Phone: 763-479-5172 under of of N0. DATE BY DESCRIPTION Fax: 763amplon 242 P 9 E-Mall: mcam IonOcam loner cam CHANHASSEN MN SHEET N O 2 OF 6 SHEETS DATE: /03/2014 REVISIONS Martin P. Campion -Lic. 19901 Date: � . LEGEND S" DENOTES SOIL BORING ❑ DENOTES CATCH BASIN O DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE -ohs- DENOTES POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES x DENOTES FENCE DENOTES GRAVEL DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE - DENOTES GRAVEL -- DENOTES WATERMAIN > DENOTES SANITARY SEWER ->>>>- DENOTES STORM SEWER LOT DATA TOTAL AREA = 1.51 ACRES EXISTING ZONING - RSF MINIMUM LOT AREA - 15.000 SF MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE - 90 FEET MINIMUM LOT DEPTH - 125 FEET SETBACKS FRONT - 30 FEET REAR - 30 FEET SIDE - 10 FEET NOTES: 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS/BOUNDARY SURVEY PREPARED BY ACRE LAND SURVEYING LEI z z tTj - ae�o a� N8 `q no 'E MSTING HWY as 38.42 r tosT.G HWSE "wean Jim \ a 1.65 - 37 4d- -- -- -- V - a - A p I \ •\ �� 'Pass � � T_ N88'04'00'E _58.00 � -� - I 33 a ... 41 ` ` � � -, _ S88'04'00'W 50.00 I TRACT B -- ------_- — i — - ------------- N `�� r R.L.S. NO. 28 — -�_ _ .- - // / 17771 'SF // / I TRACT A \, \c \ , \ / // // L - , h — — — TIWT C R.L�,S.—N& 405- — _ \— h / I I R.L.S. 140. 105 21 20.78 3 S89'49'39'E e Q 17034 SF ---- - -- - -- s ' m ��oed Easement per Doc. No 82- 2 - - -/ 15431 SF I / I / ff 4 — , 17iG !��\� / /• 15489 SF • f � I / 1 $ I R cu I t $ EYJSIING n' g _. v ,ovcsT anon- t 7 � Z H s77. 00-• L1.A � � I ��pex Ne804'00� E a2, i a@ e U J Ingress and Egr1% EA ment per ne No, 15149 �f-- / L 0 C / Q9 /�B223g CU RY FAR ND -ADD/ ry�0 21 "b 6 �_' 1p >�e F� LOT 1 \ RAINAGE & UTILITY t 49 �`� a�oeQ?sue ,�ryej JQ EASEMENT i A=55.39'58� R-50-00 DRAINAGE & UTILITY `v `r4. Q, EASEMENT a NMH G \-9FNH / INN -sae I PROPERTY DESCRIPT12! / Parcel 1: I Tract C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 109, flee of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. Torrens Property I - Torrens Certificate No. 18584.0. I --------- - -- _ Parcel - Outlots C and D, CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Caaysr County, Minnesota. / I - I Torrens Property Torrene Ca rtificate No. 19182.0. DR4/NAGS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: Parod 3 +JIL , BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES, AND BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. N CAMPION ENGINEERING F� SERVICES, INC That part of Tract 8, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 28. Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: / Commencing at the Northeast comer of said tract, thence due South along East line of said Tract 197.74 feet; thence South 88 degrees 4 minutes West 376.7 feet; thence South 1 degree 56 minutes East, 65.33 feet to actual point of beginning of tract of land to be described thence North 1 degree 56 minutes West 51.33 feet; thence South 88 degrees 4 minutes West, 101.74 feet; thence North 77 degrees 44 minutes West, 60.97 feet; thence North 67 degrees 44 minutes West, 66.07 feet; thence North 85 degrees 14 minutes West, 35.67 feet to the West line of said tract; thence southerly along said West line 24.71 feet to an Intersection with a line bearing North 48 degrees 15 minutes West from a point bearing North 89 degrees 19 minutes West, 190.50 feet from actual point of beginning: thence South 15 minutes East, 92.88 feet to said point bearing North 89 degrees 19 minutes East. 190.5 feet to actual point - of beginning. omens Property Torrens Certificate No. 27468.0. Parcel 4: Trnnt A_ RF(9STFRFn LAND SURVEY NO- 105- Men of Renletrnr of Titles. Carver County. Minnesota. e Civil Engineering a Land Planning 1800 Pioneer Creek Center, P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 763-479-5172 Fax: 763-479-4242 E-Mail: meampionOcompioneng.com or report has been prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. LOT AREA ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS SF EXIST. DRIVEWAY PROPOSED HOUSE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY IMPERVIOUS TOTAL 1 17,771 SF 4443 2987 2156 607a750 =32.47. 2 15,431 SF 3858 813 2104 866 3783 -24.5% 3 17,034 SF 4258 1605 2104 1095 4804 4 15,468 SF 3867 50 2605 930 3585 FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN, MN =28.2X j 1 `0 30 80 =23.2X GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET PROJECT NO: PRELIMINARY PLAT 13-050 DATE: SHEET NO. 3 OF 6 SHEETS 01 /03/2014 5`f55 e7lq i twk) ?i`f`'ireC (21$ CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MN. TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 1. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT ALL APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPOSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (1-800-252-1166). 4. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRICT ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS. ACTIVITIES PROHIBITED OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION BOUNDARIES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: STOCKPILING SOILS AND OTHER MATERIAL, STORING EQUIPMENT OR OTHER MACHINERY, DRIVING VEHICLES, LEAKING OR SPILLING OF ANY "WASHOUT' OR OTHER TOXIC MATER�.LS. 7. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTES AND INSPECTIONS WITH HE SOILS ENGINEER. 8. THE SITE HAS NOT NECESSARILY BEEN DESIGNED TO BALANCE THE ON —SITE MATERIALS. AFTER THE SITE GRADING IS COMPLETE, IF EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL. EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF —SITE IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES. 9. THE EXISTING TOPSOIL ON THIS SITE VARIES IN DEPTH. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY THAT ALL SURFACE VEGETATION AND ANY TOPSOIL OR OTHER LOOSE, SOFT OR OTHERWISE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL BE REMOVED FROM THE BUILDING PAD AREAS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY EMBANKMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS REPORT. 10. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE QUALITY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MN/DOT 2105.3F2 OR AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 11. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD AREA SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS REPORT. 12. TOLERANCES: a. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. b. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS % INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 13. ALL DISTURBED UNSURFACED AREAS ARE TO IMMEDIATELY RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL, SEED AND MULCH AND BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. 14. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE OR GUTTER LINE IF CURB. PLAN GRADE IS TO FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION. EXISTING CONTOURS ARE SHOWN AT 2 FOOT INTERVALS. ALL PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE SHOWN AT 2 FOOT INTERVALS. 16. RETAINING WALL SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. DESIGN CALCULATIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR RETAINING WALLS GREATER THAN FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT. 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE BUILDINGS FOR ALL NATURAL AND PAVED AREAS. 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DEWATERING AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION OR AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND, WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT ALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. EXISTII RELOC E) T( I I G=950.00 DENOTES GARAGE ELEV TF= 950.3 DENOTES TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV LL=942.3 DENOTES LOWER LEVEL ELEV S—LO DENOTES HOUSE TYPE (SIDE LOOKOUT) DENOTES GROUND ELEV N 0 30 60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET kNO. 01 23 14 MLH LOT CONFIGURATION N e Civil Engineering • Land Planning I nereDy certlry that tnis plan, specirication PROJECT NO: os 16 14 MLH ADDED RAIN GARDENS CAM P I O N or report has been prepared by me or FR E THAM 19 TH ADDITION 1800 Pioneer Creek Center, under my direct supervision and that 08 11 14 KDK REMOVED OUTLOTS P.O. Box 249 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 13-050 ENGINEERING Maple Plain, MN 55359 1 am a duly licensed Professional Engineer LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC. Phone: 763-479-5172 under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DATE BY DESCRIPTION Fax: 763amplon 242 P 9 CHANHASSEN MN SHEET N 0 . 4 OF 6 SHEETS DATE: /03/2014 REVISIONS E—Mall: mcam IonOcam lonen com Martin P. Campion —Lic. 19901 Date: � EROSIO SILTATION CONTROL 1. ALL EROSION CONTROL AND SILTATION CONTROL WILL COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA'S BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL AND REGULATIONS OF THE CITY. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FAMILIAR WIITH AND FOLLOW ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA NPDES PHASE II PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: WEEKLY EROSION CONTROL INSPECTIONS, INSPECTION AFTER 0.5" RAINFALL OR MORE AND DOCUMENTATION OF ALL CORRECTIVE MEASURES. BY BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGES THE TERMS OF THIS PERMIT AND AGREES TO ABIDE BY THEM. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ANY CORRECTIVE MEASURES ORDERED BY THE CITY OR THE MPCA WITHIN 24 HOURS OF NOTIFICATION. ALSO, ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES DEEMED NECESSARY BY EITHER THE CITY OR THE MPCA SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF NOTIFICATION. 4. ANY DEPOSITING OF SILT OR MUD ON EXISTING PAVEMENT, OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALE'S SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AND AFFECTED AREAS CLEANED. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STAKED STRAW BALES, ROCK ENTRANCES AND/OR SILT FENCES. CONTROL SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALL DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY, AT HIS/HER OPTION DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR IN HIS/HER METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. 6. ANY DEPOSITING OF SILT IN SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AND AFFECTED AREAS CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE SILT FENCES SWILL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH AND MONITORING THE REQUIREMENT OF THE MPCA PERMIT. 8. ALL DISTURBED AREAS, EXCEPT BUILDING AREAS, SHALL BE RESTORED WITH A MINIMUM 4 INCHES TOPSOIL, SEEDED AND MULCHED (TYPE I) WITHIN 72 HOURS OF COMPLETION OF SITE GRADING. SEEDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT SPECIFICATION 2575. SEED MIX 150 O 40 LBS/ACRE (OR APPROVED EQUAL). DORMANT SEEDING AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS, STRAW MULCHING QUANTITY SHALL BE TWO TONS PER ACRE, FERTILIZER (10-10-20) SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 200 POUNDS PER ACRE (CAN BE OMITTED IN LANDSCAPED AREAS IF LANDSCAPED SEEDING IS DONE CONCURRENTLY). 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED IN THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE: a. CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE A PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE CITY. b.INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. c.INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING. d. CONTACT CITY FOR APPROVAL OF EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION AND TREE PROTECTION FENCING. & MAINTAIN EROSION MEASURE, I.E. SILT FENCE, ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. f. COMPLETE SITE GRADING TOLERANCING. g.INSTALL SEED AND MULCH ON AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE WARD SURFACES. 10. SLOPE PROTECTION AND EROSION CONTROL SWJ1 BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 02370 SLOPE PROTECTION, EROSION CONTROL AND STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN OF THE PROJECT MANUAL 11. ALL STORM SEWER INLETS AND FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED. 12. STOCKPILE AREAS WHICH REMAIN ON THE SITE FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS SWILL BE SEEDED, MULCHED, AND SURROUNDED BY SILT FENCE. 13. BID LOGS SWU1 BE INSTALLED AT PIPE INLETS AND OUTLETS UNTIL RIPRAP IS INSTALLED. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT ADJACENT STREETS AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY. ANY SILT, MUD OR DEBRIS TRACKED ONTO THE STREETS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. ROCK COI ENTRANCE INSTALL INLET PROTECTION �T a® 0 I I I I I I 7pi I ExlsnNc rwusE s <--.---T-G G �` En9ementper R.�r4tft 6n'a{1.4b5s—,' 8 : °'• .. .... ... .... ...........Im 984 / CATEGORY CONTTigL BLANK X TF= r 87 RIM=ICOQ INu51 > ` ` :� �!• • •.I v=98>cv RINa994.89 •� •:�:• 1 INV=982.99 • _ e INST 2 EROSION \ _ r:: :'•1 ' —-CONI�OL BLAN ' 992� o j gr ent• c. N i5149� \ INV.=990/0 21 � INV.= 0 \ RIM= 99 IN )35B 0 \_ INV.=�g2.1 � - 1 � o `/per 77 17 � z -1007.5 TF= 9 =1001.9 I 1004 E%I1n„4 I.. E%ISiING NWY LOM£Sr RO'Ji1-f OLIO ................. ............ :'•cam':: Y4 . .. J : . ��' ... .. .... ��9r, � \V— 't e �2 2k\d Ease t per Doc. No. L/8 •'ti':.� . EXISTING CURB OVERFLOW IIS X OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT IN Mir DEFLECTOR PLATE —OVERFLOW IS X OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP �OF FILTER ASSEMBLY CURB A.1] _ ASN1N TF=989.4 E 1T I e I- LOWE9L 9 LL=981.4 4W13=983.TF=985. / �1 O INV. ftIM=994.d9 wv=96].09 x / '—aENc„u ueN RM 9926J C13•651NVE s r /f2'SF. CT 90%E1DMln r- a N CV1 Engineerirg Land Planning I hereby certify that this plan, specification PROJECT NO: CAMPION or report has been prepared by me or FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION PRELIMINARY STORM WATER 1800 Pioneer Creek Center, under my direct supervision and that ENGINEERING P.O. Box 249 13-050 Maple Plain, MN 55359 1 am a duly licensed Professional Engineer POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN under the laws of the State of Minnesota. LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT •. ��0 •''SERVICESne: 763-479-5172 •• • • 1 1 1 •0.. Plant Schedule Plant Schedule KEY QTY. COMMON: BOTANICAL NAME SIZE TYPE COMMENTS RED SUNSET MAPLE; ACER RUBRUM 2 2 BB FIRST BRANCHING AT 6'; RS 4 'FRANKSRED' STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER SIENNA GLEN MAPLE; ACER X FREMANII 2 1/2 BB FIRST BRANCHING AT 6'; SG 2 'SIENNA' STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER RED OAK; QUERCUS RUBRA 2 1 /2 BB FIRST BRANCHING AT 6'; RO 2 STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER SWAMP WHITE OAK; QUERCUS BICOLOR 2 1 /2 BB FIRST BRANCHING AT 6'; SO 2 STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER COMMON HACKBERRY; CELTIS 2 1 2 BB FIRST BRANCHING AT 6' . HB 2 OCCIDENTALIS STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER AP 3 AUSTRIAN PINE; PINUS NIGRA 81_DII BB SINGLE LEADER; FULL FORM TO GROUND BH 3 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE; PICEA GLAUCA M 8-0 BB SINGLE LEADER; FULL FORM DENSATA TO GROUND Plantina Details GUYING NO STMNG IS MANDATORY FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: - TOP STAIaS 5' ADM GROUND (MAX) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2'X2' STAINED WOOD OR PANTED STEEL DELNEA70R POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH I LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHriQE. 40 MIL.. 1 )j' WIDE SIRAP. PLACE 4' DEPTH OF SPECFED MULCH OVER PANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. FORM 3' DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACKFlLL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFTLL SON.. SCARFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. "u ]' • r, 1 "a • " VI] r•I 1 1 •I_ I WHERE WRAPPING IS CAM FOR: WRAP FROM GROUNOUNE UPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, PLACE 4' DEPTH OF SPEMED MUUM OVER PLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. FORM 3' DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACIffILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED 8ACIff1LL SOIL SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE G KLIL\ SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL MATCHING TREES NATURAL ATURALD SITE OR COMPACTED SOL MOUND MATCHING GROUND GRADE TT GROUNDUNE WITH FINISHED Planting NotesSITE GRADE. 1. CONTRALSOR S KL CWAL4 OWNER 'ME CALL' (951-451-0002 or =-=-1100 M VERIFY LOfA7M OF ALL EROERQWMD UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALMM OF ANY PLANTS OR LA09PIUPE MOON- 2. ACMAL WIXI OR OF PLANT MUERIA. IS SUIEUM TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. ND PUNTING WLL E NSTNJFD UAL AL GRAIM AO OONSTRUMM M BEM COMPLETED N THE MEDIATE AEA 4. ALL SIUBMUIIONS MUST E APPROVED E THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITW PRIOR M SUBMISSION OF ANT 1111D AND/OR QUOTE TRY THE WNSCAPE OONTWV.'IOR. S CONTRACTOR CALL FWADE Two YEAR GUARANTEE OF AL RANT MATERIA & THE GUARIVNIEE BEDNS ON THE DATE OF THE WlIDS(MPE ARCHITECTS OR OWNER'S WRITTEN AOCFPIANCE OF THE INITIAL PUINTNO. REPLACEIEENT RANT MkMVL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARAITEE COMHENCNO UPON PUWTND. a ALL RANTS 70 E SPFD901EN WADL WESMA-GROWN AD/OR W1RD - SPE(SM CRADE SWL ADFfAE TO, BUT IS NOT LMM BY. THE MUMG STAOARDS: ALL RANTS SHALL E FREE FRDY DISEASE. PESTS. WOUWO9. SCARS. ETC. AL PUNTS SHALL E FREE FROM NOTWEI E CAPS, H10LE54 OR DEFORI/IFS. TILL KMTS SHALL E FIEF FROM NiOHEN OR DEAD NIANCkES. ALL PLANTS SHALL NNE HEANY. HEALTFIY MOM NO LEAFIN9. CONFMZ 7REES % L FUAE M ESDIA.ISFED MAN LEADER NO A HELOHR 70 WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS 7WX 5:& 7. RAINS TO hW AEIi M STMDAD FOR NURSERY SPOOK (ANSI 2ICL1-20D4 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIW"TS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECHFEL. S. RANTS M E NSTALLED AS PER STANDARD ANS PUA W PRwnCES. 9. PLANTS SHALL E MEDATELY RANTED UPON N WMNL 0 SITE. PROPERLY H EL-N IA79U S F TFCES W, 70AIMW (INLY. 10. PRIOR 70 PLOffM FEUD VEFY 7HAT THE RM COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT 7HE 70P OF 7HE &RUED & EIURLAP TREE F 7NS IS NDT THE CASE, SOL OWL E RE1MED DOWN TO 7HE ROOT CMLM/R= RAR WHEN THE BAUM R EIUR AP TREE IS RANTED, THE ROOT OOLUR/ROOT FLAN SHALL E EVEN OR SIMMY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11. OPEN TOP OF NIRLAP ON E MAlER1AST REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND NEW APART PEAT POTS. IL PRUNE PLANTS AS NECEMW - PER STANDARD NUI RSFRY PRAOITOE NO 7O CORRMI POOR 6RANOIN& 11 WRAP AL SMOORI-BNiI® TTRFFS - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTINA REMIX BY MRL 1ST. 14, S=M OF TREES WMVL. REPOMM RIM AND STAG: F NOT PLM AFTER ONE YEAR 15 W NEED FOR S01L AIENOMENTB SHALL E DETERI ND UPON SITE SOL COMORIONS PRIOR Tb PUNTNQ LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LADWAPE AROWWr FOR 7HE NEED OF ANY SDL AE7OIOAS I& &AClo-U SOL TO MNEJE 7o WVW STAOAO SP0NrJ(10N 3Fn (SEIM TWSOL &ARROW) NO M E EIOSTNO TOP SOL FROM SITE FREE OF ROM ROCKS LARGER TWW ONE NCH. 91890E DEBRIS. AO LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPEL7FED OR'ERWIE. OONSIRUCITON COMPACTED 90L 70 E RIPPED TO A DEPTH OF 12' (2 DIRIEWNS)WRMfR A 10' RADON AROOUNO PLANTED TREE ]1_ '11131 ]]1 '-.]" - • --011 ]1 -.1 L11 • 1 ] • 1 • 1 I- ]1 1 ]1 I' f ]1t f NI I1 • > 1 1 ".I •] ]'.- 1 ]-.f-.]] L3 11 • 1 1] .. '1' ❑1 f I ]' I \ 1 1 1� 1 -111 31 -]11 ]I '.1 111 • '.1 ! ".]> 1 ♦ 1 ` • ]1_ f •1 1 1 ] h .1 le JIRO 19. AL DISRIRMD AWNS M BE 9000ED UNLESS OTHERWISE NDIED. SOD TO E SMOAO WESIDrA GROWN NO HAREM t3tUED1lASS ION. ALL SOD AREAS SHALL E PREFAAED WITH 4' OF IOPSOL AO RA® TO REIIDME LIEA AO ENSURE DRANIAOE SCOFFS OF &I OR GREATER SHALL E STMM 20. CONTRACTOR SNAIL PRDMDE NELi8 W WATERING OF PUNT INTER" UNIX THE PLANT IS FULY ESrABISHED OR IRRIMION SYSTEM IS OPEIA710NA_ OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE 10M FOR CONTRACTOR -.]- -.]- ♦ 1 - � 1 1 �• 1 "]]1 -]. -.]1 l - -.. I :1 -.1 1 .] 1 1 _ �: ]I 1 - .1 � Ran. Sjordai, ASLA PJ A P1400 g LAo Otn*n 0.gbn U~NWOf.0 ft VWLk 6114$5417 612-360-3257 or report has been prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Professional Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 01 /24/2014 FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN, MN IGa PROJECT NO: PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 13-050 DATE: SHEET NO. 6 OF 6 SHEETS 01 /03/2014 I7-3 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952.227-1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone:952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone:952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone:952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Prom 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax:952,227.1310 Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner per. DATE: October 12, 2015 ce' �" SUBJ: Preliminary Plat Extension — Fretham 19a' Addition Planning Case 2014-08 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a one-year extension until October 13, 2016 for the preliminary plat with variances for hardcover and setback for Fretham 19d' Addition subject to the conditions of the preliminary plat approval." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a preliminary plat approval extension for Fretham 191s Addition to permit the development of four lots. Approval of the preliminary plat extension allows the property owner to proceed with the final platting of the property without going back through the preliminary plat review process. There is currently a home on the west side of the property with a non -conforming commercial building in which the property owner lives in one of the upper units on the east side of the property. The requested extension is necessary due to the owner's desire to remain on the property, ongoing negotiations between the developer and property owner and the developer's need to prepare appropriate engineering plans to meet the city requirements. The property is located at the intersection of Bretton Way and Teton Lane. Section 18-41 of the Chanhassen City Code requires that the subdivider request final plat approval within one year of the preliminary plat approval unless a request, in writing, is submitted to the City requesting for good cause for an extension of the preliminary plat. There have been no amendments to the City Code that would adversely affect the conditions of approval for the subdivision. All the relevant conditions of the preliminary plat approval shall remain in force for the development. All fees shall be those in effect at the time of final plat approval. Staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request for a one-year extension of the preliminary plat until October 13, 2016 to create four lots out of the property with the variances for hard cover and setback on Lot 1. The conditions of preliminary plat approval shall remain in effect for review of the final plat. Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SGii i,MED Todd Gerhardt Fretham 19`h Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 October 12, 2015 Page 2 of 3 BACKGROUND On October 13, 2014, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: • Preliminary plat creating four lots, • Hard cover variances for Lots 1 and 3 of 7.4 percent (32.4 % hardcover) and 3.2 percent (28.2% hard cover), respectively; and • Front setback variance for Lot 1 of 10 feet (20-foot front setback on Bretton Way). On March 11, 2013 the Chanhassen City Council approved the change in nonconforming uses at 6411 Bretton Way and adopted performance standards as a guide to the continuing use of the building. The Chanhassen City Council approved Curry Farms 2" a Addition on July 15, 1988. RLS 105 dated 6/17/1988 creates the parcel around the building containing commercial uses. 1986 — Property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) from R 1 a (residential agricultural). 1970s — Precision Manufacturing Company, parts manufacturing, tool and die. September 16, 1964 — Registered Land Survey 28 creates the parcels containing the house and buildings as well as many of the parcels in the neighborhood. SUBDIVISION The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to create four single-family lots with a variance from the 25 percent hardcover for Lots 1 and 3, and a setback variance for Lot 1 to move the buildable area away from the existing driveway which serves the property to the northeast. The hard cover request is to permit 32.4 percent impervious surface on Lot 1 and 28.2 percent impervious surface on Lot 3, which is necessary to accommodate an existing driveway serving the properties to the north and not benefiting these lots. The setback variance is to permit a 20-foot setback from Bretton Way for Lot 1, which will move the house away from the existing driveway. Redevelopment of these parcels with new single-family homes would be beneficial to this neighborhood and the community and eliminate a non -conforming use. Todd Gerhardt Fretham 19" Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 October 12, 2015 Page 3 of 3 COMPLIANCE TABLE Areas . ft.) Frontage ft. Depth ft. Notes Code 15,000 90 125 Lot 1 17,771 97 199 Corner lot Lot 2 15,431 120 202 Lot 3 17,034 91 162 Lot 4 15,469 73 @ 186 TOTAL 65,705 1.51 acres (a; 90 feet at the building setback line permitted on cul-de-sac bubble. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve a one-year extension until October 13, 2018 for the preliminary plat with variances creating four lots for Fretham 19' Addition, Planning Case #2014-08, subject to the conditions of the preliminary plat. ATTACHMENTS 1. Letter from Kayla Mack, LakeWest Development, LLC dated September 24, 2015. 2. Copy of Letter of Preliminary Plat Approval Dated October 15, 2014. 3. Reduced Copy Existing Conditions and Removal Plan dated 01/03/2014. 4. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat dated 01 /03/2014. 5. Reduced Copy Preliminary Grading Plan dated 01/03/2014. 6. Reduced Copy Preliminary Landscape Plan dated 01/03/2014. g:\plan\2014 planning cas \2014-08 fietham 19th addition\preliminary plat extension memo 10-12-15.doc SAKE W`MST DEVELOPMENT, LLC Thursday, September 24, 2015 Robert Generous Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 14 Chanhassen, MN 55317 O: 952-227-1131 E: bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us RE: Fretham 19o' Addition Extension Request Fretham 19' Addition — Planning Case #2014-08 Dear Mr. Generous, Lake West Development is currently making progress on the development of the final plat for Fretham 191h Addition and would like to continue with the progress for this project. We received approval on October 13, 2014, by the Chanhassen City Council for the preliminary plat. We respectfully request an extension on the application for approval of the final plat through October 13, 2016 in order to provide the necessary items required for a final plat approval. We are actively continuing work on this development, however we are working through certain items with the existing land owner that have caused project delays outside of our control. We appreciate the City's continued partnership in helping us make this development a reality. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding our request. Kayla Mack Development Assistant, Lake West Development 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 O: 952-653-1346 E: kayla@lwestdev.com EC: Curt Fretham, Lake West Development Jon Fletcher, Lake West Development Encl: Letter from City of Chanhassen dated September 11, 2015 Lake West Development 114525 Highway 7, Suite 265, Minnetonka, MN 55345 1 Phone 952-930-3000 October, 15, 2014 �p OFp �rIIC�I�TI❑f i Wilfsl{Ilf40SEN 7700 Market Boulevard Mr. Ban Wikstrom PO Box 147 Lakewest Development, LLC Chanhassen, MN55317 14525 Highway 7, Suite 102 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Re: Fretham 19th Addition — Planning Case #2014-08 Fax:952.227.1110 Dear Mr. Wikstrom: Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax:952.227.1190 This letter is to confirm that on October 13, 2014, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 • Preliminary plat creating four lots, Fax:952.227.1170 • Hard cover variances for Lots 1 and 3 of 7.4 percent (32.4 % hardcover) and Finance Phone:952.227.1140 3.2 percent (28.2% hard cover), respectively; and Fax:952.227.1110 • Front setback variance for Lot 1 of 10 feet (20-foot front setback on Bretton Park & Recreation Way) subject to the following conditions: Phone:952.227.1120 Fax:952.227.1110 Buildine: 23R10 ecreation Coulter Boulevard Center I • Appropriate permit(s) required for the demolition or moving of any existing Phone:952.227,1400 structures. Fax:952.227.1404 2. A final grading plan and soils &' g p report must be submitted to the Inspections Planning & Division before building permits can be issued. Natural Resources Phone: 952.22T1130 3. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a Fax:952.227.1110 professional engineer. Public Works 4• Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Engineerin Fax:952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 1. The easements per Documents T15149 and T17882 must be extinguished prior to Fax:952.227,1110 raj plat P approval. Website 2• Prior to final plat submittal the developer shall coordinate with the gas company www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us to verify the location of the gas line. If the gas line is not within an existing easement the developer must provide and dedicate the necessary easement or relocate the gas line to lie within an easement area in accordance to CenterPoint Energys specifications. SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community for Life -Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Mr. Ben Wikstrom October 15, 2014 Page 2 3. The drainage and utility easements on the north side of Lots 1 and 3 can be reduced to 10 feet. 4. Any portion of the gravel surface on the north side of the property that is disturbed with this development shall be paved. 5. It is the developer's responsibility to coordinate access to the gravel surface with the affected residents during construction. 6. The proposed retaining wall shall comply with the following: a) A building permit is required, b) The design shall comply with the Minnesota Department of Transportation standards for retaining walls, c) The drainage design for the wall shall consider the surface runoff that will sheet drain towards the wall, d) The wall crosses over property lines and therefore it shall be built in conjunction with the subdivision and a homeowners association must be formed to own and maintain the wall, e) An encroachment agreement will be required before the retaining wall building permit is issued if the retaining wall is to be installed within the platted drainage and utility easement. f) The developer shall ensure that the wall construction does not compromise the private sanitary sewer service or the gas line in the area. g) The developer shall install a barrier (fence, berm, landscaping or other barrier) between the private gravel street and the top of the retaining wall. 7. All driveways within the development shall meet the 10% maximum driveway slope. The developer is encouraged to consider a driveway design that many homeowners desire which includes a landing (typically 3%) at each end of the driveway (at the street and at the garage). 8. Sewer and water services to each of the proposed four lots were installed by the Curry Farms 2°a Addition developer; therefore, the sewer and water lateral fees do not apply. 9. Prior to final plat approval the developer shall identify which of the four lots will receive the City SAC and City WAC credit. 10. The remaining three lots shall be subject to the City SAC and WAC, 30% of which will be collected with the final plat at the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. 11. All lots are subject to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Sanitary Access Charge (MCES SAC), which is paid with the building permit. 12. A portion of the private sanitary sewer service to the home located on 6281 Teton Lane will encroach into the platted drainage and utility easement; therefore, an encroachment agreement is required. Mr. Ben Wikstrom October 15, 2014 Page 3 Natural Resources: 1. Tree protection fencing will be required at the edge of grading limits near any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading. 2. Trees required to be planted are as follows: Lot 1 — 5 trees, Lot 2 — 2 trees, Lot 3 — 4 trees, Lot 4 — 7 trees. Planning: 1. The developer shall perform a phase I environmental audit on the property surrounding the commercial building prior to recording the final plat. 2. The existing buildings on the property, including sheds, house and the long building must be demolished prior to recording of the final plat. 3. A ten -foot building setback from the access easement (Doc. No. 14111 and 14055) is required. 4. The developer shall work with the neighboring property owners to clarify the use, permitted users and maintenance responsibility of the easement. Specifically, the easement must assure that the property owner for Lot 2 may access the rear of their property via this easement. The developer shall ensure that the necessary easement is in place so that the future property owner of Lot 2 can access the northern tip of the property. A revised easement document shall be recorded with the plat. Water Resources: The applicant shall either procure a drainage and utility easement over the entirety of the culvert or they shall install a catch basin manhole in Bretton Way just west of the driveway for Lot 4 and tie this into the existing public storm sewer system. In either event, the applicant shall model the conveyance choice to assure adequate capacity and provide a safe and stable emergency overflow. 2. The applicant must provide clarification to resolve the disparate impervious surface calculations and assure adequate volume reduction. 3. The applicant shall provide infiltration/water quality volume adequate to address the volume reduction requirements for the runoff from all impervious surfaces in the development. 4. The applicant must provide a detail of the rain gardens which is consistent with the recommendations and requirements of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual before final plat approval. 5. The applicant shall provide a detailed planting schedule for the rain garden areas. 6. The applicant shall provide a hydrograph showing the duration of ponding is less than 48 hours and shall reduce the ponding depth so the bounce does not exceed MN Storm Water Manual guidance or correct the soils and demonstrate that they are commensurate with HSG A or B soils. Mr. Ben Wikstrom October 15, 2014 Page 4 7. The side slopes into the rain gardens shall not exceed three horizontal feet for every one vertical foot. 8. Discharge velocities into the rain gardens shall not exceed four cubic feet per second or the applicant shall provide scour calculations and adequate energy dissipation to assure erosion will not be an issue. 9. Pre-treatment shall be provided to minimize sediment deposition into the rain gardens. 10. Drain tile services must be provided to all properties that will flow from the back to the front of the lot. 11. Erosion Control plan /SWPPP must include all elements required under Chapter 19 of City Code. 12. Engineer estimate of quantities for erosion control and sediment prevention, including those necessary for final site stabilization, shall be provided and used to calculate escrow amount. 13. A Storm Water Management Utility fee estimated to be $9,168.00 shall be paid with final plat. Final plat documents must be submitted to the City 35 days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Conditions of the preliminary plat must be addressed for final plat approval. Final Plat approval must be requested within one year of preliminary plat approval. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat approval. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or by email at bgenerousO ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure c: Naomi Carlson cc: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official Marty Campion g:\plan\2014 planning mes\2014-08 fied a n 19dr a tddition\approval letter prelim plat and variance.doc ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: Submit three (3) sets of full size, 50 scale construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Improvements: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading h. Street lights & signs I. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping 7. Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (8%" x 11"), and a digital copy in .tif format. 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc format. 9. Lot tabulations. Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Updated 11-29-06 g:\eng\fonns\final plat submittal.doc TOTAL AREA - 1.51 ACRES 65,701.5 SE EXISTING HAROCOM:R CALCULATIONS m i °srr ov,Re riaYe = m. r rn4 annY - ,A.I IF I.a9 PROPOSED HAROCOWR CALCULATIONS -ans LEGEND J �+ w,orte u.mn ma .xnY. .. »a PA.tl llltl I mYa+..w mw, V .mw1 fM,MAowEw��vY - -------------- ----- r I BUG 15 2014 c,NAWAMENPLMONODEPT Y+»[Iy.1.uM1 IY.a.u» na.» mrwnw.0 vPerus+e,yy Y.Yulu.as.yma, 77 x CAMPION I hMt I HAM 78 I H AUL71 I ICON I EXISTING CONDITIONS I I ENGINEERING .�.. r E REMOVAL PLAN SERVICES, SERVICES, INC '�^ '^" �' "'�•-» LAKEWES7 DEVELOPMENT ___ .................... currT ,in 1 11 e n. " r- ------------------- I I I I I I A A�G 15 2014 CHANHA4SEN PLANNING DEP'f -- I .. . I � IAT DATA .s...�r....-. r..—..n..�. I wu. ,o. ovm-,m nn ammo -nun ..r vc.. mn -,sal _L_ N N CAMPIO. N •'�'�"µ FRETHAM 19THADDITION ENGINEERING PRELIMINARY PLAT =SERVICES, INC. LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT 0 CITYOFCHANHASSEN RECEIVED I I AUG 15 2014 I I CHANHASEN PLANNING DEPT ....,+a.,xaaawaw®...mwmxamna.a,mama � •..••_ r + mr iamoaf mr w e+vaf m nz.nwdr rmio mso awn n[ nwn'a w.fawimz uartr mwodnw vw w wa od[ m t z b .% J I I r _ � _�I �— � �T'� �m1pMs m�ia..o�. 'mOiomrt� °' omao rvuM �� _ - F _ JJ _ p, . �/ • .u.an. mm.nn. w.n w � m rw.r w.oa wuw a vrxon �e mma w.aam"id"' w w+ra xe.®n. r as n+a xdaw r.arim aam. . d.ar .efaoa anm m..mo..w >w..o arr a.mt xa.a m.xar _ �1 ur ' — do , � .. wra own umeauwaw.rar.w o�+a mR ..or.. r—�� /+a Ile n..OMo .uruif�mnfi ��.�.�� mrn�mufw mmw�mw M1lrm I _ _ "�.�a °'�awau mru+urt aim area I u: �m� I I I L r mwm. nnxnr mawxmweenmwiomn �oa oa.. /i aa.. awr .am a au x am-rrw r mr-a-eew. a nr mmnm n awo anw imwm e "w N CAMPIGN ";,°°yp;'a„"°.+�---+.+�;;; "naw - �"M+,++ FRETHAM 19THADDITION� PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 13-050 �ENGINEERINO SERVICES, INC. ewe^, LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT ISHELT N0. 4 OF 6 SHEE iS d1/0320u CHANHASSEN,MN Pont 4'HFFM.dn Plant Schedule KEY OW.. CONOM. B01µICA. NAME SEE I TYPE COMMENTS 1 A 3 1/3 FIRST RRANCXMa AT 6: •fAµKSRED• BB STRAICXi CENTRAL LEADER Z A A ENXI: 1/2 ORTRAIGHT FIRST BRANCHING AT e: CENTRAL RO E R 3 1/3 Be FIRST BRANCNABG AT 6% $1RAICHT AL LEADER E AN: LQ E 1/1 M FIRST BRANCHING AT G.: TRAILHT CEN A R M R K Y L 2 SANLMHG AT p': OLGOENI"' BeFIRST 1RAIGHT C N AP J AUSTRIAN %NE: WS NICRA 6. a. Be &MULE LEADER: LL FORM m OR J a HILLS a: MCEA kAUCA 6_ p Be SINGLE LEADER; FULL IaRu )ENSATA 10 Planting Details Planting Notes AM --AAA— Mr..... �... I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I CIY(QFCHA HA SEN RECEIV AUG 15 2014 C{AMAMPLANNINGDEFT AN _ t -- I I I LAKEWE ST DEVELOPME ... NT _ . - PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN IMSO I4-v8 Chanhassen City Council — October 12, 2015 activities so come out on Saturday, October 24`s. That's a week before the actual Halloween date. That will get you ready for the holiday. For the Halloween season. Saturday night October 24s'. 5:30 to 7:30 at the Chanhassen Rec Center. Come one come all. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Ryan seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendation: Approve City Council Minutes dated September 28, 2015 2. Item Deleted. 3. Fretham 19'" Addition, Located at the Intersection of Bretton Way and Teton Lane: Request for Preliminary Plat Extension, Applicant: Lake West Development, LLC 4. Resolution #2015-62: Resolution Decertifying Tax Increment Financing District 44 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 3 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: By the way ladies and gentlemen, we are a quorum tonight. We have 2 members who are, have excused absences tonight. Councilman Campion and Councilwoman Tjornhom are both unable to be with us tonight so, but we are a quorum so we can conduct business in accordance with State Statute. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: Mayor Laufenburger: We have one, for sure one scheduled visitor presentation. Dr. Peterson. Just state your name and we're happy to have you with us Dr. Peterson. Dr. Dennis Peterson: Mr. Mayor, members of the council. Mr. Gerhardt, Mr. Knutson. I'm Dennis Peterson. I'm the Superintendent of Schools in Minnetonka School District and a resident of Chanhassen. Mayor Laufenburger: Happy to have you as a resident of Chanhassen. Dr. Dennis Peterson: So I would like to do a presentation that I had sent over earlier today and share with you regarding the referendum that the Minnetonka School District is running in November. November 3' actually and so with your permission I'd like to share that power point and talk through it a little bit. Mayor Laufenburger: Absolutely and just for citizens who may not be aware of this, Minnetonka School District 276 comprises about the northern one-third of our city and whereas the southern two- thirds is part of Eastern Carver County School District 112 and you're District 276 so with that you have our permission to continue. Thank you. 2 SCANNED CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 12, 2015 Mayor Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. Mayor Laufenburger, Councilman McDonald, and Councilwoman Ryan COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilwoman Tjornhom, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Paul Oehme, Kate Aanenson, Todd Hoffman, Greg Sticha, and Roger Knutson PUBLIC PRESENT: M.P. Knight Dave Bishop Darin Perry Katie Connelly Mary Penny Brad Solheim 3605 Red Cedar Point Road 3605 Red Cedar Point Road Noodles and Company Minnetonka Schools Minnetonka Schools 121 West Main, Waconia Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you and welcome to this council meeting to those of you that are present in the chamber as well as those of you that are watching on cable channel 8 or 107-2 Mediacom at home. Our first agenda item this evening, or let me first speak to the agenda. We have had one tabling. Agenda item G(1) has been tabled from the agenda for tonight and if there are any modifications other than that to the agenda council members. If not then we will proceed with the agenda as printed. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT: Mayor Laufenburger: I do have a public announcement to make tonight. This is October. This is the season of Halloween as we approach it with pumpkins starting to festoon our stoops and our front porches. The City of Chanhassen with the support of our local community event sponsors, many businesses in town is proud to announce the fourth and the final community event in 2015. This is our 31 ' Annual Halloween Party. Join us on Saturday, October 24' for an evening of fun. Children 13 and under are invited to participate. Bring along your parents of course, in a wide variety of activities including trick or treating, hayrides, weather permitting, carnival games and optional spooky room. That sounds scary. Refreshments and a family entertainment magic show featuring Treasure Beyond Measure. I invite all area residents, their families and friends to join me at the Chanhassen Rec Center from 5:30 to 7:30 on Saturday, October 20. Pre -registration is required by Friday the 23`d at either City Hall or the Chanhassen Rec Center. The fee is $5 per child. Adults are free and that $5 covers all October 13, 2015 CITY OF SEN Mr. Kurt Fretham Lakewest Development, LLC 7700 Market Boulevard 14525 Highway 7, Suite 102 PO Box 147 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Fretham 191 Addition — Planning Case #2014-08 Administration Phone: 952.2271100 Dear Mr. Fretham: Fax: 952.227.1110 On October 12, 2015, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one-year extension Building Inspections until October 13, 2016 to the following: Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax:952.2271190 • Preliminary plat creating four lots, Engineering • Hard cover variances for Lots I and 3 of 7.4 percent (32.4 % hardcover) and Phone: 952.227.1160 3.2 percent (28.2% hard cover), respectively, and Fax:952.2271170 . Front setback variance for Lot 1 of 10 feet (20-foot front setback on Bretton Finance Way) Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax:952.227.1110 Final plat documents must be submitted to the City 35 days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Conditions of the Park & Recreation preliminary plat must be addressed for final plat approval. Final Plat approval must Phone: 952.227.1120 be requested by October 13, 2016. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal Fax:952.2271110 for final plat approval. Recreation Center Should you have an questions, I ( ) y 2310 Coulter Boulevard Y Y q ,pease contact me at 952 227-1131 or email at Phone:952.227.1400 bQenerous(&ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Fax: 952.227.1404 Sincerely, Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952227.1130 Fax:952.2271110 Robert Generous, AICP Public Works Senior Planner 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Enclosure Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center c: Naomi Carlson Phone: 952.227.1125 ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Fax:952.227.1110 Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Website Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Jerry Mohn, Building Official Marty Campion 9:\plan\2014 planning cases\2014-05 fretham 191h additionbne year prelim extension lener.dacx SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: Submit three (3) sets of full size, 50 scale construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Improvements: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading h. Street lights & signs i. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (8'/2" x 11 "), and a digital copy in .tif format. 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc format. 9. Lot tabulations. Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Updated 11-29-06 gAeng\forms\final plat submittal.doc 10/13/2014 Shops at Chanhassen Planning Casc �201 }-2R PLANNING COMMISSION: SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 CITY COUNCIL: October 13, 2014 APPLICANT: Halifax Development LLC SUBDIVISION SITE PLAN REVIEW Location 945 West 781h Street 1 10/13/2014 - 1 Subdi\islon O L I i 945 West 78t^ Street -- Landscaping and Sign Plan '1 50 �•,.k emu- - IR i i I �A fi � ww U 2 K 10/13/2014 yiF Recommendation -U 'The City Council approves Planning Case 2014-28 consisting of a preliminary plat to replat 63,372 square feet into one lot (26,372 square feet) and one outlot (37,469 square feet) Chanhassen Retail 4' Addition as shown in plans dated received October 6, 2014, approval of a site plan dated August 13, 2014, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation." C 3 r October, 15, 2014 CITY OF CWNSEN 7700 Market Boulevard Mr. Ben Wikstrom PO Box 147 Lakewest Development, LLC Chanhassen, MN 55317 14525 Highway 7, Suite 102 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Re: Fretham 19'h Addition — Planning Case #2014-08 g Fax: 952.227.1110 Dear Mr. Wikstrom: Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 This letter is to confirm that on October 13, 2014, the Chanhassen City Council Fax: 952.2271190 approved the following: Engineering Phone:952.227.1160 • Preliminary plat creating four lots, Fax:952.227,1170 • Hard cover variances for Lots 1 and 3 of 7.4 percent (32.4 % hardcover) and Finance 3.2 percent (28.2% hard cover), respectively; and Phone:952.2271140 Fax:952.227.1110 • Front setback variance for Lot 1 of 10 feet (20-foot front setback on Bretton Park & Recreation Way) subject to the following conditions: Phone:952.227.1120 Fax:952.227.1110 Buildine: Recreation Center 1. Appropriate permit(s) required for the demolition or moving of any existing 2310 Coulter Boulevard structures. Phone:952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 2. A final din plan and soils report must be submitted to the grading p epo Inspections Planning & Division before building permits can be issued. Natural Resources Phone. 952.227.1130 3. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a Fax: 952 2271110 professional engineer. Public Works 4. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Engineering: Fax:952.227.1310 Senior Center 1. The easements per Documents T15149 and T17882 must be extinguished prior to Phone: 952.227.1125 dal plat approval. Fax:952.227.1110 te 2. Prior to final plat submittal the developer shall coordinate with the gas company www.ei.chanhassen.mn.us n.us to verify the location of the gas line. If the gas line is not within an existing easement the developer must provide and dedicate the necessary easement or relocate the gas line to lie within an easement area in accordance to CenterPoint Energy's specifications. SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Mr. Ben Wikstrom October 15, 2014 Page 2 3. The drainage and utility easements on the north side of Lots 1 and 3 can be reduced to 10 feet. 4. Any portion of the gravel surface on the north side of the property that is disturbed with this development shall be paved. 5. It is the developer's responsibility to coordinate access to the gravel surface with the affected residents during construction. 6. The proposed retaining wall shall comply with the following: a) A building permit is required, b) The design shall comply with the Minnesota Department of Transportation standards for retaining walls, c) The drainage design for the wall shall consider the surface runoff that will sheet drain towards the wall, d) The wall crosses over property lines and therefore it shall be built in conjunction with the subdivision and a homeowners association must be formed to own and maintain the wall, e) An encroachment agreement will be required before the retaining wall building permit is issued if the retaining wall is to be installed within the platted drainage and utility easement. f) The developer shall ensure that the wall construction does not compromise the private sanitary sewer service or the gas line in the area. g) The developer shall install a barrier (fence, berm, landscaping or other barrier) between the private gravel street and the top of the retaining wall. 7. All driveways within the development shall meet the 10% maximum driveway slope. The developer is encouraged to consider a driveway design that many homeowners desire which includes a landing (typically 3%) at each end of the driveway (at the street and at the garage). 8. Sewer and water services to each of the proposed four lots were installed by the Curry Farms 2'd Addition developer; therefore, the sewer and water lateral fees do not apply. 9. Prior to final plat approval the developer shall identify which of the four lots will receive the City SAC and City WAC credit. 10. The remaining three lots shall be subject to the City SAC and WAC, 30% of which will be collected with the final plat at the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. 11. All lots are subject to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Sanitary Access Charge (MCES SAC), which is paid with the building permit. 12. A portion of the private sanitary sewer service to the home located on 6281 Teton Lane will encroach into the platted drainage and utility easement; therefore, an encroachment agreement is required. Mr. Ben Wikstrom October 15, 2014 Page 3 Natural Resources: 1. Tree protection fencing will be required at the edge of grading limits near any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading. 2. Trees required to be planted are as follows: Lot 1 — 5 trees, Lot 2 — 2 trees, Lot 3 — 4 trees, Lot 4 — 7 trees. Planning: 1. The developer shall perform a phase I environmental audit on the property surrounding the commercial building prior to recording the final plat. 2. The existing buildings on the property, including sheds, house and the long building must be demolished prior to recording of the final plat. 3. A ten -foot building setback from the access easement (Doc. No. 14111 and 14055) is required. 4. The developer shall work with the neighboring property owners to clarify the use, permitted users and maintenance responsibility of the easement. Specifically, the easement must assure that the property owner for Lot 2 may access the rear of their property via this easement. The developer shall ensure that the necessary easement is in place so that the future property owner of Lot 2 can access the northern tip of the property. A revised easement document shall be recorded with the plat. Water Resources: 1. The applicant shall either procure a drainage and utility easement over the entirety of the culvert or they shall install a catch basin manhole in Bretton Way just west of the driveway for Lot 4 and tie this into the existing public storm sewer system. In either event, the applicant shall model the conveyance choice to assure adequate capacity and provide a safe and stable emergency overflow. 2. The applicant must provide clarification to resolve the disparate impervious surface calculations and assure adequate volume reduction. 3. The applicant shall provide infiltration/water quality volume adequate to address the volume reduction requirements for the runoff from all impervious surfaces in the development. 4. The applicant must provide a detail of the rain gardens which is consistent with the recommendations and requirements of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual before final plat approval. 5. The applicant shall provide a detailed planting schedule for the rain garden areas. 6. The applicant shall provide a hydrograph showing the duration of ponding is less than 48 hours and shall reduce the ponding depth so the bounce does not exceed MN Storm Water Manual guidance or correct the soils and demonstrate that they are commensurate with HSG A or B soils. Mr. Ben Wikstrom October 15, 2014 Page 4 7. The side slopes into the rain gardens shall not exceed three horizontal feet for every one vertical foot. 8. Discharge velocities into the rain gardens shall not exceed four cubic feet per second or the applicant shall provide scour calculations and adequate energy dissipation to assure erosion will not be an issue. 9. Pre-treatment shall be provided to minimise sediment deposition into the rain gardens. 10. Drain file services must be provided to all properties that will flow from the back to the front of the lot. 11. Erosion Control plan /SWPPP must include all elements required under Chapter 19 of City Code. 12. Engineer estimate of quantities for erosion control and sediment prevention, including those necessary for final site stabilization, shall be provided and used to calculate escrow amount. 13. A Storm Water Management Utility fee estimated to be $9,168.00 shall be paid with final plat. Final plat documents must be submitted to the City 35 days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Conditions of the preliminary plat must be addressed for final plat approval. Final Plat approval must be requested within one year of preliminary plat approval. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat approval. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or by email at bgenerous(&ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure c: Naomi Carlson ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official Marty Campion g:\planN2014 phummg ca \2014-08 fiedmm 19th &khtim\appmval leas prelim plat and vaianwAm ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: Submit three (3) sets of full size, 50 scale construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Improvements: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading h. Street lights & signs i. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping 7. Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (8'/2" x 11 "), and a digital copy in .tif format. 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc format. 9. Lot tabulations. Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Updated 11-29-06 g:\eng\forms\final plat submittal.doc September 11, 2015 MYOF CMSINLakewest Mr. Kurt Fretham Development, LLC 7700 Market Boulevard 14525 Highway 7, Suite 102 PO Box 147 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Fretham 19'h Addition — Planning Case #2014-08 Administration Dear Mr. Fretham: Phone:952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 On October 13, 2014, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: Building Inspections Phone:952.227.1180 • Preliminary plat creating four lots, Fax: 952.227.1190 • Hard cover variances for Lots I and 3 of 7.4 percent (32.4 % hardcover) and 3.2 percent (28.2% hard cover), respectively-, and Engineering a Front setback variance for Lot 1 of 10 feet (20-foot front setback on Bretton Phone:952.227,1160 Way) Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance City code Section 1841. - Final plat —Generally, states in part: Phone: 952.227.1140 (a) Unless otherwise provided in the development contract for phased development, Fax:952.227.1110 within one year after the date of the city council approval of the preliminary plat, the subdivider shall file an application for approval of the final plat. Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227,1120 If the final plat application is not filed within this period, the preliminary plat will be Fax:952,2271110 considered void unless for good cause shown an extension is requested in writing by the subdivider and granted by the city council prior to the one-year anniversary date of the Recreation Center preliminary plat approval. 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:7 22Final plat documents must be submitted to the City 35 days prior to the City Council Fax:952.252.2271404 404 meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Conditions of the Planning & preliminary plat must be addressed for final plat approval. Natural Resources Phone:952.227.1130 Please advise me of how you intend to proceed. If you have any questions, please contact Fax: 952.227.1110 me at (952) 227-1131 or by email at bgenerous(&ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Public Works Sinc 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 Senior Center Robert Generous, AICP Phone:952.227.1125 Senior Planner Fax: 952.227.1110 Enclosure Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us c: Naomi Carlson ec: Marty Campion g-.V1an\2014 p1,in ca V014-08 rretham 19th addhimbce yw lena d= SCANNED Chanhassen is Community for Life- Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: 1. Submit three (3) sets of full size, 50 scale construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Improvements: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading h. Street lights & signs I. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping 7. Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (8'/2" x 11 "), and a digital copy in .tif format. 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc format. 9. Lot tabulations. Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Updated 11-29-06 g:\engVorms\final plat submittal.doc City of Chanhassen Planning Commission meeting September 16,2014 Ladies & Gentlemen of the planning Commission & City Planning officials My name is Gerald Story, I live at 6281 Teton Lane, my property is described as the N.E property in the proposed planning report. According to State Law my property is designated as landlocked. However we have a 14ft road easement which allows us to get to a county road. We have solely maintained & used this easement for 23 years. This road easement is also a utility easement housing water, sewer and gas lines. • 1. We are requesting a minimum ten foot setback of all structures whether homes or retaining walls. �^^ I I fGAa<Mux� • 2. We request to have the developer build 3 houses instead of 4 to better suit the neighborhood. However if a 4ch house is allowed it should be moved to the wider part of the lot #1, making it more desirable to the neighborhood. • 3. There should be no building permits granted until all building structures are demolished and removed. • 4. Our deeded easement is a forever easement and cannot be changed or altered. Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 5. Final plans shall include existing and proposed elevations at the property corners and structure comers. 6. The grading plan shall include drainage arrows to indicate the direction of water flow. 7. The developer shall submit an accurate soils report indicating soil conditions and permeability. 8. The grading plan shall identify proposed stockpile areas. 9. The grading plan shall show the top and bottom elevation of the retaining wall near the Target sign. 10. The parking spaces shall be adjusted so that minimum dimensions are measured from the gutter flow line. 11. The developer must pay the partial payment of the SAC fees and the WAC fees with the final plat. Planning 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 2. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. Wall signs shall be limited to the north, east and south elevations. Wall and monument signage shall comply with the sign ordinance. All signs require a sign permit. 3. The applicant may share a monument sign within the same PUD contingent upon the removal of the existing monument sign. 4. The exterior material for the trash enclosure must be of the same exterior material as the building. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. 5. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. All fixtures must be shielded. 6. Provide and maintain a cross access agreement with Target for parking. 7. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon approval of the subdivision and the administrative lot line adjustment for Target as shown in Exhibit # 7 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 3 to 0. As an employee of Target, Councilwoman Ernst recused herself from this item. At this point Councilwoman Ernst rejoined the City Council for the remainder of the meeting. 13 14-0F Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 FRETHA 4 19Ta ADDITION, 6397 AND 6411 BRETTON WAY: REOUEST FOR PRELIlIIIlNARY PLAT REVIEW FOR A FOUR -LOT SUBDIVISION WITH VARIANCES FOR Kate Aanenson: Thank you Mayor, members of the City Council. This item did appear before the Planning Commission on their September 16th meeting. There was residents in attendance regarding this application and had some concerns. I'll go through those as we go through the staff report. Again the developer, Lakewest and the underlying property is Naomi Carlson. The subject property actually includes two parcels. Two addresses there. 6397 and 6411 and located off of Bretton Way and access, that's how the access will be gained. I just wanted to give you a little bit of background on the request for the four lot subdivision and that's. Sorry. Here we go. So the history of this property is 6397 and 6411, the two parcels there. So there is some history on this property and I just want to briefly go through this. On March 111 of 2013 we talked about the non -conforming uses that were on this property and in 1988 the Curry Farms 2m Addition was approved which is surrounding this property so this is a remnant parcel kind of created in that area. So there's a registered land survey that goes back to 1988 that created those two parcels. Again in 1986 the property was rezoned to Single Family Residential from Residential Agriculture and there was in 1970 a Precision Manufacturing business on the site. So there's been a lengthy history on this piece of property and now the applicant's coming forward to plat four lots on this subdivision. So your application then is for preliminary plat review of the four lot subdivision with variances for hard cover and setback. So to create the four lots as shown on here there is an easement to the north which I'll spend a little bit more time on that. That easement serves other parcels so Mrs. Carlson owns the property underneath but there's two easements that run. One to this homeowner and one to this homeowner. The easements. So because of those easements, that's where the hard, the variance comes into play because there's the hard surface coverage is calculated towards each of those lots. Again the underlying property owns those but there's an easement over them. So there is a significant amount of grading on this. It's challenging slopes in the area. One of the other requests then is for a variance to move this house forward. You can see the grading on this site because of the retaining wall along here. The retaining wall's about 305 feet long and averages 8 to 12 feet in height along that so this property number, this lot right here actually goes up, the only access to it is via this property through here. This easement driveway through here so they need that to maintain the lot area requirement. Mayor Furlong: And can I interrupt with questions as you're going through? Kate Aanenson: Sure. Mayor Furlong: That little portion of the parcel to the north that you were just highlighting, which of the three lots or four lots, excuse me. Kate Aanenson: It goes with the second lot. Mayor Furlong: Second lot. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: And when we're talking about lots 1 through 4, as we're looking at this, is Lot 1 on the left and Lot 4 on the right? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: So Lot I is west of the property and Lot 4 is on the east side of the property. 14 SCANNED Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Kate Aanenson: This is correct. Yep. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Okay. Kate Aanenson: So this little remnant parcel then, to get the lot area needs to be attached to this. Mayor Furlong: To Lot 2? Kate Aanenson: Correct, and because of the significant amount of grading and the retaining wall which you can see on there, which is 8 to 12 feet in height, the only way to get to the back of that lot would then be along this easement. Again the underlying property owner owns that property. Mayor Furlong: Right. Kate Aanenson: There's just easements on top of it. Councilman Laufenburger: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Furlong: Mr. Laufenburger. Councilman Laufenburger: Thank you. Ms. Aanenson, can you just re -state for me? You're talking about a retaining wall. The retaining wall does not exist today, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That is correct. Councilman Laufenburger. This is a planned retaining wall. Kate Aanenson: That is correct. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. And just one more thing. This, when you talk about in Lot number 2 you talk about getting the lot size. You're referring to the lot size that is required for building size, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: You're correct. Councilman Laufenburger. Okay. Kate Aanenson: So in the compliance table that we have in the staff report lots are required to be 15,000 square foot minimum and they do meet that and that's important to have, for them to have the lots to make it work. Councilman Laufenburger: But. Kate Aanenson: So this is a challenging piece. Just to get the four lot yield, we see some of these when it's infill development. More challenging with some of the encumbrances on it and the change in grade so the wall, which is expensive to put up to make that work, again protecting those homeowners because you have people that are using this easement to access their property. Snowplowing and the like so we did have conditions on there. Engineering did put on the conditions on there for the design of the wall and also for the wall that, because it crosses over property lines they want to make sure that we're not is Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 impacting anybody to the negative but they also want to make sure that there's a barrier. Some sort of fence along that southern side so there's protection there because of the change in grade. Councilman Laufenburger: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Furlong: Mr. Laufenburger. Councilman Laufenburger: Kate the, you're using the term easement on that northern portion of the property. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Councilman Laufenburger: This is a, can you further describe this easement? Kate Aanenson: Yep, I'm going to go through a couple slides and go through that in more detail Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. Okay. Kate Aanenson: So just kind of give you why, set up why the, why there needs to be relief on some of the lots to push this house further down. Because of that we talked about the two homes that access here and this property owner, to get to the back of their lot will need to access there, is to push that house further away so you're not right adjacent to that easement. Again our ordinance doesn't have a setback from an easement. Just from a property line but we think it makes sense to pull that lot down and because coming off of Bretton Way would make it a tuck under. We think it's more desirable to have the house shown as is but given a variance and I'll go through that in a little more detail. So these are the easements so one easement remains on 6305. The first easement goes to that home. Then there's an easement that goes to 6281, the home in the back. Then there's a couple other easements that are on here. Oops, a couple other easements that are on here that should also be removed and those are some older easements that when they go to finalize the plats that will also need to be extinguished so those are the easements that are currently on the property. So did you have a question on this? Councilman Laufenburger: I did. Kate Aanenson: Go ahead. Councilman Laufenburger: May I Mr. Mayor? Mayor Furlong: Please. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay, so the easement that's on the screen right now which shows the, I'm going to use a different word. It's access so the owner of the subject property has granted access for a period of time for the property owners at 6305 and 6281 to drive along the private property of the subject property. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Councilman Laufenburger. In order to get to their homes. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. 16 r J Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. Is that easement a City easement? Is the City a part of that easement at all? Kate Aanenson: No. Councilman Laufenburger. With that agreement. Kate Aanenson: No. No. Councilman Laufenburger: Why not? Kate Aanenson: It's a private easement. Because the underlying property owner granted an easement to that property and the City was not a part of that easement. Councilman Laufenburger: So we as a City, we have no, I don't know what the right word is. Kate Aanenson: Jurisdiction. Councilman Laufenburgen Jurisdiction over that, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay, we have no jurisdiction over that. So that agreement is between those property owners or those users of that access. Kate Aanenson: Right, and the underlying property owner, correct. Councilman Laufenburger. Okay. Kate Aanenson: And that would be the same with the easement that goes to the property. Councilman Laufenburger: 6281. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. Is it? Roger Knutson: Mayor and council, just to be clear, what's happening here if approved will not affect their easement rights. Councilman Laufenburger: Oh it won't? Roger Knutson: We can't affect their easement rights. Mayor Furlong: And when you say easement rights you're talking about the Teton Lane property owners. Roger Knutson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: 6305 and the 6281. Roger Knutson: Right. They will continue to be in effect. 17 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Mayor Furlong: They will have access within that 14 foot wide. Roger Knutson: We will not take, we don't have the right to take it away and we're not attempting to take it away. It will remain. Kate Aanenson: Right. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Thank you. Kate Aanenson: Right. Right. Right. Todd Gerhardt: And Kate can you switch to the other two easements you were talking about? Kate Aanenson: Yep. Todd Gerhardt: Now those we do have the right to eliminate those easements as a part of the plat. Roger Knutson: Yes. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, we've asked that those be extinguished as a part of the plat. Mayor Furlong: As a condition of approval. Kate Aanenson: Because they would, the houses would fit, or actually lie on top of those easements so we typically don't like to build over an easement so we'd want those extinguished. Councilman Laufenburger. For what purpose were those easements in place? Kate Aanenson: Access easements. Councihnan Laufenburger: Okay. Okay Kate Aanenson: Again there was a couple commercial uses that are, or a larger commercial use that was in there. The barns that were there. That provided access for those. Councilman Laufenburger: But they're no longer needed so. Kate Aanenson: That's correct, with the subdivision so. Okay. So back to the four lots then. The stormwater management is being proposed to be treated with rain gardens so these, there's two ways that the water would be started on the western side moving towards the east and then ultimately could be tied into an existing private system or then tied into the City's system so those, we'll have that resolved by the time of final plat but that's the direction of how the stormwater will be managed in this area. The landscaping plan, that meets city ordinance. And the variance. As I mentioned the variance for the hard cover is because our ordinance, because it's the underlying property, counts that hard cover for those easements so they're being penalized for that as far as the hard cover requirements of the lot so the lot sizes are big enough. It's just the fact that the hard cover is over the percentage so staff did recommend approval, as did the Planning Commission. Then the front setback as we talked about for Lot 1, we also recommended that that be given a 20 foot front yard setback so that can be moved closer actually to Bretton Way giving greater separation from that private easement on the north. So that was to get it further away from this. So this is again that hard cover that's counting towards all the lots so you can see 18 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 the property line is up here on that north side so those, all that hard cover is going against their calculations. So with that I'd still be happy to answer any questions, if there's still more questions. Mayor Furlong: Oh I'm guessing there might be. Kate Aanenson: I'm guessing there's going to be a few. So we are recommending approval and I think there was specific concerns from the neighbor; but I also think there were a lot of neighbors that were happy that it was becoming houses too. Mayor Furlong: Why? Kate Aanenson: Just because there's been some complaints up in the neighborhood for the use of the barn and the like. Mayor Furlong: And maybe I'll start, as the property sits today it's non -conforming. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: With the neighborhood, correct? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: And the uses are not consistent with residential. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: Usage and obviously this, there have been matters before the council in the past and I know some concerns but it's, yet I think you also mentioned it is zoned for residential. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: That's what makes it nonconforming. It's a different use. It was a use in place prior to the zoning changing to residential. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: Is that... Kate Aanenson: At one time it was permitted. That's correct Mayor Furlong: It was permitted. It continues to be permitted as a non -conforming until such time. How do we typically when we're dealing with, from a planning standpoint and from a zoning and use standpoint, what are we looking for when there's a request from a non -conforming property owner to make a change? Whether seeking variances or in this case subdivision. Is there some goals and objectives from the City with regard to seeking to eliminate the nonconforming use? Kate Aanenson: Well I think the main thing is to have it fit the character of the neighborhood and I think the challenge here was as I, you know this is infill development which is kind of the remnant piece that was left. It has some nuances, specifically the narrowness and the grading of the slope going up towards the easement. There was other ways to develop some of those properties to the north but they also have 19 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 larger lots so some of those properties to the north could be subdivided into the future so again just trying to maintain the character of kind of the Curry Farms. The lot size there and make it fit in. Mayor Furlong: But isn't it a goal to try to reduce or eliminate nonconforming uses? Kate Aanenson: Absolutely. Mayor Furlong: From an overall city objective. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Consistent with our Comprehensive Plan correct? Kate Aanenson: Right, yeah. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: But again in this circumstance sometimes you have to be a little bit, give some relief with variances in order to make that happen because of the complexity. Mayor Furlong: There's some value being received publicly because the non -conforming use is going away. Kate Aanenson: That's my point, yes. Mayor Furlong: And you're saying working with the property owner to find a way that fits for everybody. Kate Aanenson: The best we can, exactly. Mayor Furlong: The best we can, thank you. Okay. I probably have some other questions but I'll defer to the questions of council first. Mr. Laufenburger any questions at this point? Councilman Laufenburger: Yeah just Kate, I think you're using very good words to describe the situation we're in. I do want to talk about this setback first of all. The setback on Lot 1, in this case the variance they requested and the picture we're looking at right now is the existing structure, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, right. The house would actually would be right in here is where. Councilman Laufenburger: So what essentially we're doing is we're allowing the builder or the owner of Lot 1 to move their house closer to Bretton Way. Farther away from what will be a retaining wall, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. To give them some clearance. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. So the only, what we're, what the applicants are asking for is that give us the ability to move the house a little bit closer to Bretton Way than the current setbacks allow. 2 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay, alight. So now I understand that one. Now talk about the variances. Lot 1, which is where that current house is and then also Lot 3, you're saying, I think you're saying that what, the land that is in the private easement, we, are we obligated to count that as hard cover? Kate Aanenson: Yes because their underlying property is still a part of this plat. Councilman Laufenburger: Even though that surface may be a permeable surface? Kate Aanenson: Right. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. So we're saying including that, that adds more hard cover surface to the lots and therefore to give appropriate building platform or building footprint it's necessary to raise the amount of allowable hard surface on those lots 1 and 3. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Councilman Laufenburger. Okay Kate Aanenson: And again I just want to add the complexity of working with this narrow lot. Working with the grades. Trying to get the lots, the houses to sit just so. Again looking at this first lot, Lot 1. To give them some reasonable lot area which would really be on the eastern side, that's probably the more desirable and not having that tuck under so could you have moved the lots? Then it effects where the stormwater is going. How the grading. How the retaining wall works so it's a lot of details. Councilman Laufenburger: But these four lots in total square footage of these lots meet the minimum requirement of our RSF. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. That's correct. Councilman Laufenburger: Single family, okay. That was my questions, thank you Mr. Mayor. Mayor Furlong: Any other questions? Councilwoman Ernst: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Furlong: Councilwoman Ernst. Councilwoman Ernst: Kate can you tell me when, and Councilman Laufenburger referred to this. The permeable surface that we're talking about and we're counting as hard cover. Kate Aanenson: Yes, it's the existing easement. So you can see right now this is where that easement falls but that's also, this dark line on the north side there is part of the underlying property owner, Mrs. Carlson's property. So even thought it's compacted gravel we still count it towards hard surface. Councilwoman Ernst: And has that been common practice? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Yes. 21 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Mayor Furlong: Any other questions? Councilwoman Ernst: Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Ms. Tjornhom? I have a few and certainly we'll have an opportunity to hear the property owner and developer at some point here but with regard to the easement and this access easement that we're looking at here, and I think Mr. Knutson you may have raised the point. The easement provides the two property owners to the north access through this 14 foot strip across the top of the property. But the property owner still owns that property underneath and as long as they're not obstructing the access to the property owners that have the easement, that's still their property and they're free to use it as they choose to depending on, have we looked at, have you looked at the easement agreement? I mean they could still access that and I think that was even mentioned by Ms. Aanenson about the need for Lot 2 to be able to get to their property to the north there. Roger Knutson: Yes we have looked at the easement agreements. I have them with me tonight. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Roger Knutson: And we cannot and will not obstruct their, by what we're doing here tonight, their ability to continue to use that easement for access to their property... Mayor Furlong: And as long as it's not obstructed though. I mean that doesn't, the easement doesn't preclude the property owner from also driving along that. Roger Knutson: No. Mayor Furlong: Or doing something along there as long as they're not obstructing the access that's granted through the easement. Roger Knutson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: With that Ms. Aanenson you mentioned Lot 2, in order for them to gain access up there. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Will likely use the same driveway that exists currently. Is one of our conditions that Lot 2 will have a cross access across Lot 1 so that they're able to do that? Kate Aanenson: They'd have to go back out on Bretton Way. Come back up this way because there is that 12 foot retaining wall. Mayor Furlong: And so because of that, does our staff report include a right for Lot 2 property owner to access across Lot 1 or along that same 14 foot... Kate Aanenson: Actually all the property owners still have those rights is what I heard the city attorney say because it goes with the underlying properties. Mayor Furlong: Well but as soon as we subdivide I don't think Lot 4 would have any legal right to access across Lot 1 unless that's specifically granted. And 3 and 4, obviously Lot 1 can let anybody cross the property who wants to but from a legal access I'm wondering if Lot 2 should have that as part of a condition so that Lot 1, sometimes neighbors don't get along. Lot 1 can't keep them from getting up to 22 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 their property. And I don't need an answer tonight unless we do as part of the preliminary plat to make that a condition. That Lot 2 would have a cross access through this same 14 foot wide easement up above. Mr. Knutson. Roger Knutson: The easement rights exist today but, before the plat will not be impaired by the plat. Mayor Furlong: Right. Roger Knutson: You want to create additional rights. Mayor Furlong: My question is, should Lot 2 be, have cross access across Lot 1 through the same existing private easement so that Lot 2 can access the northern part of their parcel because there's going to be a retaining wall obstructing their access otherwise. If they want to mow the grass or do something up there, how do they get up there unless they access across Lot 1? Roger Knutson: It's my understanding that they can go around and use that access. Mayor Furlong: Well but if it's a private access, if it's not a public access how is, what if Lot 1 property owner doesn't want Lot 2 property owner crossing his property to get to Lot 2's property on the other side of the retaining wall? On the north side of the retaining wall. Todd Gerhardt: He has underlying rights to go up that way from the original easement. Mayor Furlong: He has to let the properties to the north access because they already have the easement but Lot 2 doesn't, wouldn't have an easement at this point. Roger Knutson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: So I think that should. Councilman Laufenburger: Well, Mr. Mayor? Kate Aanenson: Can I just tell you want our recommendation was is that you know really the person that needs to use that driveway is Lot number 2. Mayor Furlong: And for reasons... Kate Aanenson: And that's where we were trying to go but that's what I thought I heard the city attorney say, they would still have a right to it but we were trying to minimize those people using the back of there for storage or the like. The only person that really needs to access that would be Lot number 2. Mayor Furlong: Right and Lot number I can drive up and down that or do whatever they want as long as they're not obstructing the access easements that already exist. Kate Aanenson: Right. Mayor Furlong: I'm just saying that, that once this is subdivided Lot 3 isn't going to have, be a part of, to my understanding. Now maybe it will be but unless it's a condition, Lot 3 and 4 wouldn't be able to drive up and down that private easement on Lot 1 or 2. Roger Knutson: Unless they've given an easement. 23 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Mayor Furlong: Unless they're given an easement rights and that's why I'm thinking we should probably make sure that Lot 2 has easement rights in that same section so that there's no more burden to Lot 1 other than what's currently existing so that they can access, or have that same access easement up to their property line. Mr. Laufenburger. Councilman Laufenburger: Mr. Mayor as you're talking about this one thing I'm thinking is, today prior to the subdivision the property owner of these four lots, but it's one lot, that property owner is one entity so the private easement is between that single owner and let's identify her as Ms. Carlson and that agreement is between Ms. Carlson and the owners of 6281 and 6305 so there's an easement between those. My question perhaps for Mr. Knutson would be, when those, when this is subdivided will it be necessary for Mrs. Carlson to write in her selling agreements with whoever buys the lots that she chooses not to hang onto, that there will be then for example 6281 on the property on the north to the right, or to the east, will they have to have 4 individual private easements in place in order for them to be able to drive all the way along that private easement? Do you understand my question Mr. Knutson? Roger Knutson: Yeah. The underlying. Mayor Furlong: ...public interest. I'm sorry. Roger Knutson: The underlying fee owner, Mrs. Carlson who owns the underlying fee. What the easements are laying on top of can grant additional easements to different property owners. They've not inclusive. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. Mayor Furlong: And the question I have is, is should as a condition of the subdivision because once it's subdivided the properties can be sold separate. The fee interest can be sold separate and therefore the purchaser of the second lot, in order to gain access to the northern part of that second lot should have access rights across Lot 1. Roger Knutson: You could condition your preliminary approval on that. Kate Aanenson: That's what we had in our recommendation. On only Lot 2. Mayor Furlong: Is it in there? Kate Aanenson: Yes. I'm trying to find it. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: That was our recommendation. Only Lot 2 so we're not increasing that. Mayor Furlong: We're not increasing that, okay. Kate Aanenson: Or potential conflicts in the future. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. 24 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Kate Aanenson: I just wanted to point out one other thing too that I didn't bring up is there's existing buildings on the property. We did state in the staff report that's a condition that those buildings must come down before anything else were to go forward if the project was to advance. Mayor Furlong: With regard to some other questions that were raised at the Planning Commission, with regard to the demolition of the property. Are we comfortable that we have the resources on staff or can obtain those through an outside consulting firm to appropriately evaluate the... Kate Aanenson: The applicant's responsible to do that. Do the assessment of the buildings to make sure before they come down. Yeah, that's their obligation. They do that through the building department. Mayor Furlong: And do we have sufficient staff or can we access sufficient outside advisors as necessary to make sure that that's done in a safe manner. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah, as a part of their building demolition permit they have to give us an environmental assessment of the property. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: And so somebody. Mayor Furlong: By a qualified professional? Todd Gerhardt: By a qualified firm and they would go in and review for asbestos and any other materials. Tanks and what have you and make sure that they're properly disposed of. Mayor Furlong: The variances that are being requested, one for the hard cover. The other for the assessment, I think this was asked but the setback variance is being requested for Lot I only. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: And now is there anything, and perhaps topography would make this impractical but there's nothing to prevent a house to be built on Lot 1 that would use the existing driveway within the easement as a driveway to that property as well? Kate Aanenson: Well that's why I think our goal we tried to make a condition. Mayor Furlong: And as I. Kate Aanenson: Make a condition that makes that condition a separate driveway, correct. Mayor Furlong: Well but as I'm saying that, I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to that if that's the best way to build a house and such like that. At the same time I think for flexibility having that setback variance in place makes some sense as well. Kate Aanenson: Okay. Mayor Furlong: But if the best, if the way the person wants to develop the house utilizes that existing driveway. Kate Aanenson: Sure. 25 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Mayor Furlong: I just want it on the record that that would be allowable. Kate Aanenson: Yep. Yeah, there's some. Mayor Furlong: It's their property as long as they don't obstruct it and there may be some reasons why that wouldn't work. Kate Aanenson: There was some clean up that we're recommending on this because part of the gravel road in this area here. I'm not sure you can see that. Mayor Furlong: I can see it's outside the easement. Kate Aanenson: It's outside the easement and we recommended that that be cleaned up but that's something that we can look at. I'd let the developer speak to that because they would have a better indication of the grades and how that would work with the style home. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And I think this gets back to the issue that it's a non -conforming property as it sits today and the basis, but the hard cover variance, that's one of those give and takes I assume, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: Because to avoid a precedence here, just because somebody provides an access easement across their property and somebody builds in a driveway across there, that doesn't necessarily provide them an opportunity to come to City Hall and ask for a variance on hard cover surface. Kate Aanenson: Right. It's just. Mayor Furlong: It's a private easement. It's an impairment that they offer to their own property so, I mean the give and take here is because this is a non -conforming use and we're trying to bring it into conformance. Is that part of that? Kate Aanenson: That's correct and just so you know when they first met with staff I, they were told they couldn't get that relief and there was no way this project was going to move forward. They actually met with some of the surrounding properties to see if they could get, they worked really hard to try to come with some of, this is the only way it could move forward with the four lots. Building these retaining wall to be, to give some relief and not penalize them for that easement hard cover. Mayor Furlong: And so it's a very specific. Kate Aanenson: It's unique to this property. Mayor Furlong: Unique to this property. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: And all the circumstances and facts associated with the property. Kate Aanenson: Correct. F' 26 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Mayor Furlong: And in the staff report there were questions about the location of that retaining wall to the easement and a request that it be set back from that easement but the staff report doesn't require any setback correct? Kate Aanenson: Well we wanted, we'd like to see the design of that but again part of that setback is to allow for some sort of barricade so you're not, a person driving on that easement isn't right adjacent to a 12 foot drop so you've got some room to put some sort of barricade. Whether that be fencing or just balusters or something so we'll look at that engineering as we get into some of the final plat details. Mayor Furlong: Okay. So that would be something that staff would review with the developer as they look at their grading plan? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Engineering wants to look at that again. Mayor Furlong: Okay. But nothing specific from a condition standpoint at this time? Okay. Kate Aanenson: There is conditions that they put some sort of barricades and fencing and that's in there. Mayor Furlong: I saw that. Kate Aanenson: Yeah but it didn't, we didn't call out the specific designs. I think we called out the type but not a boulder wall. Some of those specifics on the type of wall were put in there but we'd work through that as they submit those drawings. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And can you tell me where that condition is that allows that cross access for Lot 2. I must have missed that one. Kate Aanenson: I was looking for it too. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Maybe you can keep looking and if we can't find it then we'll make sure it gets in there. I'd rather be redundant than omit. Kate Aanenson: Sure. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is the applicant here this evening and would you like to address the council this evening? Good evening sir. Ben Wikstrom: Mayor Furlong and council members. Good evening. My name is Ben Wikstrom. I'm with Lakewest Development, 14525 Highway 7 in Minnetonka. Mayor Furlong: Good evening. Ben Wikstrom: Good evening. Thank you to staff for that report and for, to all of you for getting almost all of the questions out of the way or all of my talking points. We, I just want to mention we had a neighborhood meeting before the Planning Commission meeting on September 111 was our meeting and we've also met individually with some of the neighbors about some of their concerns. The response was generally favorable. I think the neighborhood would like to see single family homes there rather than that use that's there now but we would be happy to meet with individual neighbors going forward as well but I think we've satisfied most of their concerns and as I said their reaction was favorable overall. There were some questions in the, at the Planning Commission meeting as well and at our neighborhood meeting about some of the stormwater management and the grading and drainage and things like that and our 27 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 project engineer is here tonight so, Marty Campion. He could come up and answer any specific questions you have about those but I think those were well addressed at the Planning Commission meeting as well. We believe that the easement we've been talking about at length here is an evident practical difficulty for this site which of course you need to prove for a variance but if you look at a couple of the tables that are in the staff report you'll see that that hard surface coverage being used up is over half of what's allowed on those lots and in fact our proposed house and driveway on Lot 1 are less than what's impervious in that easement area. Then on Lot 3 it takes up about a third of what is allowed on that lot so, or actually it takes up a higher percentage but it will be a third of what is on that lot. So there are those other easements that Kate mentioned and we will certainly vacate those. Those are old access easements for the use of those manufacturing buildings. The, what we are calling that access easement on the north side, that 14 foot wide easement is from 1969. It's not very well defined at all but the Story's and Mr. Rabe and whoever lived there before them have been using it as an access easement and there's also I believe a sewer line through there and a gas line through part of it so we don't wish to challenge the use of that easement or something so we're asking for this relief on the setback. In general we think this will be an improvement to the neighborhood. We think the houses and the builders, the builders we work with and the houses that we would propose would be architecturally compatible with the neighborhood. Kind of the 20 year, 25 year newer versions of what's in the Curry Farms subdivision. Two story homes. Some of our recent examples are, we have a subdivision in Eden Prairie. A couple in Minnetonka and they are all similar homes to what you see in Curry Farms. Just newer ones and we of course aren't the builder but we have a good relationship with 4 or 5 builders. We don't limit ourselves to that if we're doing a larger subdivision but in this case we have had some interest from some of those same builders so we think the housing types that will be there will fit in nicely with the neighborhood. I will try to answer any questions you have and as I stated our project engineer is here too so than you. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you Mr. Wikstrom. Any questions for the applicant? No? Thank you and thank you for working with staff and the neighbors as well. Ben Wikstrom: Thank you. Mayor Furlong: We appreciate that. There was a public hearing held at the Planning Commission and I know that there are a number of residents that spoke there. Some of those questions I think have been addressed either in the staff report or this evening. If there are any new information that members of the public would like to address to the council through public comments we'd certainly entertain those at this time. Jerry Story: Good evening. I'm Jerry Story. I live at 6281 Teton Lane. I'm the homeowner that has the deeded easement. I feel that I requested several things at, from the planning, Bob Generous and Kate and I got no response from them. What I would like to see, actually I see no stipulation in the planning report regarding my part of the easement. My coming and going. My property is landlocked. 1 don't know if you understand what landlocked is. That means I don't have owned property on a street and so the only way to get to my property is through either a granted easement or a hostile easement. We do have a granted easement. I've been using it by ourselves for 23 years. We've owned the property 23 years. No one else has ever used it. I've maintained it. Rob has easement down to our property line and he uses the front part of it. He's never used the back part of it and I've maintained that easement all those years. Paid for all the upkeep myself What I'm requesting is to get some sort of recognition that I have an easement and I don't see why the integrity of the easement that I've had for 23 years should be compromised in any way. Mayor Furlong: And I guess let me ask you that question Mr. Story because clearly that's a concern. Do you see that this subdivision is obstructing your use of that easement or compromising that easement? 28 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Jerry Story: I don't see it as obstructing. I talked to Kurt Fretham personally in the beginning when they fast sent out their thing. I gave him an alternative. I said if the land is deeded you won't need it for hard cover. If it's deeded to me you don't need it for the hard cover and because I've got enough land to take care of that hard cover and he said I have enough. There's enough property there to get 4 houses and still deed that property away. He told me that and but for some reason they didn't seem to want to do that so. Mayor Furlong: Okay Jerry Story: There's other ways that this can be done I think and not compromise the integrity. I also requested a 10 foot setback of any retaining walls and homes and that was never addressed in the planning report either. There's papers regarding that, that I submitted to the planning committee or planning workers but none of it was addressed in the planning report. So and the little outlot that goes up into Robbie's property has a very steep grade. There's no way you could ever drive up there anyway so it's kind of redundant. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Jerry Story: You know 1 know Bob mentioned something about storing boats and trailers but it's too steep to even drive up let alone store something there so is it buildable that little piece of property? Kate Aanenson: I think there's a storage building on there right now. Jerry Story: There is, yeah. It's an electrical building. Mayor Furlong: But I think isn't it Ms. Aanenson that northern part of Lot 2 is part, would be part of Lot 2 with this subdivision. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: And so it, it is Lot 2 in it's entirety is a buildable lot. Jerry Story: Right, yes. Mayor Furlong: Right and so as I understand it and Ms. Aanenson correct us, Lot 2 with this subdivision going forward would include that northern most parcel to the north of the. Jerry Story: Yeah. Kate Aanenson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Okay. Jerry Story: I don't have a problem with the subdivision. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Jerry Story: My problem is with maintaining the integrity of my easement that I've had rights for 23 years. I don't think that should be compromised in any way. If you divide it up into four properties, now I've got to deal with four neighbors instead of one. It's totally ridiculous. Mayor Furlong: Well and I guess. 29 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Jerry Story: It can be done in some other way. Mayor Furlong: I mean given the private easement that goes with the property so if this subdivision occurs is the easement still exist? Roger Knutson: It still exists. Mayor Furlong: It would still exist. Roger Knutson: Yes. Jerry Story: But isn't there a city code that you can only have so many properties on an easement? Kate Aanenson: All these properties would access Bretton Way or unless we wanted to let the other one off you can have three off of a private drive. That was what the Mayor had mentioned earlier but all the other three, Lots 2, 3 and 4 all have access off of a public street. So it's not. Mayor Furlong: Well and even Lot 1 has access off a public street. Kate Aanenson: Pardon me? Mayor Furlong: All four of them have access off public streets don't they? Kate Aanenson: Right but I'm saying even if, even if what you had recommended potentially could use existing. Mayor Furlong: That would be an option for Lot 1. Kate Aanenson: That would be an option, that's correct. Mayor Furlong: Yeah. Jerry Story: The easement was created for my property because it was landlocked when the properties were subdivided back in '69 so, and they keep saying it's not inclusive but it is inclusive because it was created for my property and you can't get to any other properties from that easement except to my property so in my opinion that's inclusive. And state law says that a landlocked property has dominant possession of the easement. Not the land owner. I'm the dominant. She's the serbiant. Serviant, I'm sorry. Mayor Furlong: And help us understand what this subdivision is doing that is going to, you said it isn't going to obstruct your use of that easement so where is the, where is the, what with your right to access your property through that easement, if that's not going to change. If that's still going to be available, help us understand where the problems are. Jerry Story: Well for 23 years no one's ever driven down there until Mrs. Carlson started driving down Mayor Furlong: Okay. Em Chanhassen City Council —October 13, 2014 Jerry Story: I would like to maintain that. Why should, now four other cars, four other properties be able to drive down the driveway that I maintain. It's ridiculous. It's, my deed says there should be no encumbrances and to me that's an encumbrance. And it's going to devalue my property. Mayor Furlong: Well the underlying property, if I'm mistaken Mr. Knutson. Does the underlying property owner of the easement, that's still the property owners, right? Roger Knutson: There's a fee owner and the easement owner. Mayor Furlong: Fee owner. So the fee owner still has use of that property as long as they're obstructing the easement owner from their easement. Roger Knutson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: Which is the access. Roger Knutson: That's right. Mayor Furlong: Okay. So they couldn't plant a tree in the middle or somehow obstruct Mr. Story's ability to access his property. Roger Knutson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. But I mean, I'm not an attorney. I've successfully avoided becoming one in my life but if you still have access to your property. Jerry Story: I don't have a problem with having access. Mayor Furlong: I'm trying to understand what this subdivision does. Jerry Story: I'm having a problem with, if I've got one bad neighbor and what if I get four bad neighbors? Mayor Furlong: Well, okay. From our standpoint, and again I'll defer to the attorney. What we're looking at here as the city council is, is a subdivision request. Jerry Story: Yes. Mayor Furlong: In looking at it does it meet our ordinances and is it consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and are there reasons why if for example this subdivision, part of the condition, or the components of the subdivision were obstructing your private access. Access to your home through your private easements, I think that would be something that we would consider and so that's why I'm trying to focus. I mean yes there will be four property owners versus one but from a standpoint of what the City Council's looking at in terms of the subdivision request, that's what I'm trying to focus on here tonight so that's where I'm looking for help there. Jerry Story: Well the other thing is, is building a retaining wall right, their first plan was to have it right up against the easement and what about my grandkids? Mayor Furlong: Well and I guess. 31 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Jerry Story: They're going to fall down a 12 foot embankment? Mayor Furlong: That was a question that we raised earlier and I think city staff is saying there has to be some barrier there and that will be part of the review process with the grading plan. To take a look at that exact issue. Jerry Story: And they put that house on their first drawing right up against the easement. Where are we going to put the snow? Where are you going to put the snow? Is that why you did the setback? To give a 10 foot setback from the easement. Kate Aanenson: Mayor, members of the City Council. Mayor Furlong: Yes. Kate Aanenson: If we were to vacate this, if Mrs. Carlson was to say you know I give this property to the two property owners to the north, the subdivision would look the same. There'd still be a retaining wall there. There'd still be some sort of barricade because the shape of how those lots are. Mayor Furlong: Because of the topography. Kate Aanenson: Right so, I'm just trying to separate those two issues a little bit. I think there's just some concern of control of that easement and that's something that's outside of our control. Mayor Furlong: Understand. Okay. So I think what I understand Mr. Story is, and Ms. Aanenson correct me if I'm wrong, that we recognize that there's a 14 foot easement there and that there will need to be because of the topography a retaining wall running along side. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Question is how far away so that there can be an appropriate barrier there. 10 feet may or may not be the right distance and what I think Ms. Aanenson is requesting, it's up to the council to approve or not, but to work with the developer to find what's an appropriate distance because that's still, that's still their property and so to come out further into their property. Now you're impeding upon their property rights as well. Jerry Story: Yes, I understand. Mayor Furlong: So that's why it's all trying to find that right balance as you know and I think what Ms. Aanenson is saying is, let's look at what's a distance away from the easement necessary, and the existing driveway. Just because the easement's there, if the, depending on the location of the driveway within the easement, you may not need any distance at all. There may be some other ones. It looks like there's some area where the driveway comes outside so all that has to be part of the discussion. Jerry Story: The problem is, is I never get any consideration to even negotiate with them. They decide on their own what to do and they never take my suggestions at all. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Ahight. Jerry Story: Why shouldn't I have a little bit of negotiating power here? Mayor Furlong: Well. 32 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Jerry Story: What's the harm of putting something in this to protect the integrity of the easement? What's that harm? Mayor Furlong: Put something in the conditions here? Jerry Story: And the planning report. Mayor Furlong: I think with the, as I understand it from the staff report and the planning that clearly there is consideration of that easement along there and dealing with the barrier of some form for the issues that you've mentioned. Jerry Story: Okay. Mayor Furlong: With regard to negotiating with the property owner, people are free to negotiate as much or as little as they want and again what we're looking at from the City standpoint is the subdivision request. Does it meet the ordinances? Does it meet our Comprehensive Plan and does there need to be some relief for some of the ordinances because of the uniqueness of the property? Jerry Story: So I get no consideration at all? Mayor Furlong: I didn't say that. I think consideration of your private easement across the property has been considered. Jerry Story: Okay, thank you. Mayor Furlong: Alright, thank you. Councilwoman Ernst: Mr. Mayor, a question? Mayor Furlong: Yes, Councilwoman Ernst and then we'll certainly accept more public comment as well Councilwoman Ernst: Kate can you, in regards to the comments that were made regarding the consideration and the language in the report, can you kind of spell that out? Where that is and what it is? Kate Aanenson: Well, I can't agree to, I don't have the authority to negotiate a private easement. What we did try to put in the staff report, we did try to put a condition in there that tried to limit, because all those lots have access off of Bretton Way but Outlot 2 does need to have access off that private drive so we did try to make some awkward attempt at that and I'll let the city attorney address whether or not that's legal or not but we did try to put a condition in there and I did find it on page 285 of your staff report. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Kate Aanenson: It talks about that the neighbors try to work together to clarify that. The easements but again we have no control over that but we did ask, and that was put in the conditions of approval. It's probably a little awkward and maybe let the city attorney address whether or not but it was just trying to clarify maintenance and use of that easement. Councilwoman Ernst: Okay. 33 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Roger Knutson: I think the language in condition 4 is appropriate. Councilwoman Ernst: In the 285? Roger Knutson: It says. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Go ahead. Roger Knutson: The easement must assure that the property owner of Lot 2 has access to the property. Mayor Furlong: To their property via this easement. Roger Knutson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Councilwoman Ernst: 1 just don't know if that, if that addresses the integrity that he's talking about. That's my question and maybe I need to know what he means by integrity. Jerry Story: Well... Mayor Furlong: If I could have you come back up to the microphone so we can hear you at home and on the recording, thank you Mr. Story. Jerry Story: It's snow removal. It's coming and going. Today we came home from an eye appointment and Ms. Carlson was in the driveway, stopped on top of the hill. She moved but she wasn't too quick about moving. Councilwoman Ernst: So does that mean you were not able to get to your house then from there? Jerry Story: Well I had to wait til she got out of the way. Councilwoman Ernst: So. Kate Aanenson: I can only guess that happens on other occasions with the other properties too. Councilwoman Ernst: Yeah. Kate Aanenson: I guess that's why we were trying to clarify with property number 2 who does have access rights, that they try to work together. We can't you know just so there's understanding of maintenance. We've been trying to work on this issue for 9 months and I'm not sure that we can solve those problems. The parties that have. Mayor Furlong: It's still a private. Kate Aanenson: The parties that have an interest have to solve the problem. Mayor Furlong: Right. Okay. Does that answer your question? Councilwoman Ernst: Yeah, and the snow removal I mean the City. Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Kate Aanenson: Those are the parties that have interest right. The City doesn't plow it and maintain it, correct. Councilwoman Ernst: Okay. Mayor Furlong: Alright, thank you. Jerry Story: And the fact that I've owned it for 23 years and no one's ever used it ever. Until recently. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Sir, did you have public comment as well? Robert Rabe: I'm Robert Rabe and I live at 6305 up there. And I've learned there for 22 years and so there are a few things, and we talked about you know some of them. I do intend to preserve all of my current rights for that easement certainly and it does give me access to the back part of the lot. If you look there's that key, right. So indeed. Kate Aanenson: This is your house and your lot. Robert Rabe: Right, exactly. Kate Aanenson: So that easement goes all the way to that. Robert Rabe: Correct. Kate Aanenson: To the terminus. Mayor Furlong: To your back property line? Robert Rabe: Correct. Councilman Laufenburger: Actually Mr. Rabe, do you have access to the entire length? Robert Rabe: Correct. Councilman Laufenburger: Or only to the end of your property line. Robert Rabe: I'd have to read the easement again. Certainly to the end of the property, my property line. Councilman Laufenburger: As far as you would need to go. Robert Rabe: Correct. Councilman Laufenburger. I mean the only reason you would need to go onto the easement farther is if you were perhaps driving to visit Mr. Story. Robert Rabe: Right. I don't know that for sure. I don't have any idea. Councilman Laufenburger. Okay. Robert Rabe: It would seem likely it stops at some point. At about the property line. I don't know that. 35 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. Robert Rabe: I can check. Let's see, we mentioned that the house is very, that house number 1 is very close to the easement. I think we're all in agreement that that's too close if it's not given a variance to move to the south. Councilman Laufenburger. Do you, excuse me Mr. Rabe. Robert Rabe: Yep. Councilman Laufenburger: Does this picture that's on the screen, does this depict where the house is right now? Robert Rabe: The house right now? Naomi's house? Councilman Laufenburger: Yes. Robert Rabe: No. Councilman Laufenburger. Okay. Robert Rabe: Naomi you'd have to indicate where that is exactly. No, there's no home there now. Kate Aanenson: Yeah I'd have to look at there's an underlying one here. I mean there's a property here. Robert Rabe: Right. It's down. Kate Aanenson: It's down so that's where this would slide to. Councilman Laufenburger: Oh, okay. Kate Aanenson: This is a registered land survey. That's why it's showing that as a separate lot. It would slide down. Mayor Furlong: And I think for clarification there, what I heard earlier is the City doesn't have any setback, as part of our ordinances we don't require any setbacks from easements but in order to provide opportunities what's being recommended by the staff and was approved, recommended by the Planning Commission was to provide a setback along Bretton Way, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: A variance. A reduced setback requirement along Bretton to provide that flexibility but I think there's still, I mean even the property outside of the easement is their property and so if there's no setback requirement within our ordinances for us to require that I think would be beyond. What we can do is provide relief so that they can move the property, or that home. Robert Rabe: So is the baseline plan to move the house farther to the south? Kate Aanenson: Yes. 36 IF Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Mayor Furlong: What's our ordinance requirement Ms. Aanenson with regard to location of homes within, is it buildable area or just as long as it's within the setbacks? Kate Aanenson: As long as it's within setbacks. If you look at this lot you can see this is the envelope that it could go into but what they're requesting is to slide it down closer over here. Councilman Laufenburger: So this picture does not depict? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Councilman Laufenburger: What's going to happen. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Councilman Laufenburger. This picture, what does this picture depict? Kate Aanenson: This meets the setback requirements but it's not desirable. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay. So this is what the setbacks would require and I'm looking at the area to the south of this picture. That's what would be 20 feet would be required. Kate Aanenson: I don't know do you have a drawing of the, of that lot with the revised? Mayor Furlong: And just for clarification, all I'm saying is, and I'm in favor of the setback relief for exactly the reason that you're commenting but I'm also recognizing that this will be somebody's property and that as long as they're within the city setback ordinances, if they wanted. If they didn't want to take advantage of that relief, they wouldn't have to. Is that fair? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Robert Rabe: So at what point does that get determined? Mayor Furlong: Well tonight we're going to be considering whether we give relief or not. If we didn't give relief, which I would be in favor of giving relief. If we didn't give relief then they'd have to fit it within the, if you can show the dashed lines there. Where that building kind of sits right now. Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Yeah. Mayor Furlong: So we're. Kate Aanenson: That's the building envelope. Mayor Furlong: What staff is recommending, and then highlight that line there Kate? Ms. Aanenson, where the relief would come from. Kate Aanenson: Sure. So they're moving it down. Mayor Furlong: It's along that one. Kate Aanenson: And the developer stated that's their desire to move it down that way. 37 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: So it's a better lot so, yeah. I don't think if they were given that relief that they wouldn't use it. Yeah. Robert Rabe: Currently there's no building right up against the easement though. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Robert Rabe: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Robert Rabe: So then assuming that the variance is given, is it essential or mandatory that that be followed or could they stay. Kate Aanenson: Well that's what I was just saying. It's their desire to move it away from the road right- of-way. It makes abetter lot. A better driveway and... Robert Rabe: So it's binding then once it's approved? Mayor Furlong: No. Kate Aanenson: No. Mayor Furlong: No, it's not binding. Robert Rabe: So the builder could still choose to move it back. And at what point, how does it get determined then with all this discussion you'd think there'd be some resolution. Mayor Furlong: Well, with regard to the location of the building on that lot? Robert Rabe: Right. Mayor Furlong: What's being recommended by staff and the Planning Commission is that the, is that we approve relief so that they, that setback from Bretton Way is reduced so that they can move the property. Robert Rabe: Right. Mayor Furlong: Which from Ms. Aanenson's comments is their expectation at this point. But they're not required to do that and as long as they meet the setback requirements of the city. Now could they build within the easement? No because that would likely obstruct the access of use. Robert Rabe: Ahight. So but the plat approval would show the house in the new location. Mayor Furlong: Does the plat include the house? Kate Aanenson: When they come back for final plat we'll have better identification of kind of the retaining wall and where that's going to sit and that will give them a better idea but they, they're asking for the variance because that's what they believe desires a better lot. They wouldn't be asking for it if they didn't think that would... 38 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Robert Rabe: There are two people involved here. Two parties right? Kate Aanenson: Correct, there's the builder too. Robert Rabe: Right. Kate Aanenson: But I think they're, they know what makes a good, sellable lot. That's why they're asking for the relief. Robert Rabe: But it's, there's no builder present. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Robert Rabe: So it would seem that it would be a binding agreement. Once we have this much discussion about it, thought and planning but. Mayor Furlong: What we can do is provide relief if there's a practical difficulty. Is that correct standard Mr. Knutson? If the council so chooses to provide that variance, that relief through the variance process. Robert Rabe: Just trying to be clear. Mayor Furlong: Right. Robert Rabe: So then should the builder decide not to take advantage of it then we're right back here again? Is that right? Mayor Furlong: Mr. Knutson fast. Roger Knutson: Mayor, members of the council. The variance, if approved, gives them the right to build it in the area shown by the variance. Robert Rabe: Right. Roger Knutson: They also have the right under the ordinance to build it anywhere our ordinance allows them to build it. Robert Rabe: Right Roger Knutson: They don't have to use the variance but every indication is they intend to and will use it but are they legally required to use it? No. Robert Rabe: Right, I understand. But we're here discussing the approval of the plan based on some assumptions so should the assumptions assume that they do build it with the variance or that they do not build it with the variance? What assumptions do we? Roger Knutson: We assume they'll build with the variance or they're required by the zoning ordinance. We don't dictate which they have to do. Robert Rabe: No, I'm not asking that. Right. 39 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Roger Knutson: We're not making any assumption. Robert Rabe: So then we should take a more conservative approach which would be that that would not be, excuse me, an attractive building site. Because they could build it there, right. So then we would not want to favor the approval based on that. Roger Knutson: But that would not be a basis for turning down a subdivision if they meet all the requirements for a subdivision. Robert Rabe: But that's why we're here. Roger Knutson: The question is, do they meet requirements of the ordinance. Robert Rabe: Well not just right? But it is one items. Roger Knutson: Do they meet the ordinance? Do they meet ordinance requirements? Robert Rabe: I agree but it's not the only consideration because that's why we're here. Roger Knutson: No. That's why we're here to determine whether they meet ordinance requirements. Robert Rabe: But they already do so why have a discussion? Roger Knutson: But the City Council hasn't made that decision yet. Robert Rabe: Okay. So then the other items. I'm not sure if, does an easement mean they have, the new property owners have access via vehicle or that they just have access? Do we know? In other words does access mean they can walk from their property up on the easement or does it mean they have to be given a vehicle access? Any idea? Roger Knutson: I have copies of their easements and I believe they're intended to allow vehicle access. Robert Rabe: Yeah I don't know, right. Okay. Roger Knutson: But whatever the easement say, the easements, we cannot enlarge or subtract from those easement documents. Those are property rights that are there. Robert Rabe: Yep, makes sense. The property region that has that second lot extension, as Jerry said it is about as steep as a stairway and about as high as the ceiling here probably and it's directly adjacent to my house and I've maintained it for you know a long time and so it's probably an impediment. It's probably a problem and I don't know what to do next about it necessarily but we probably should contemplate it. And kind of a similar item is with regard to the point where the easement hits Teton. Moving that paved area into the area that's not paved currently is not attractive so it's been there probably 40 years. I don't know. So that's another area that we'll have to discuss and then of course as Jer y's mentioned, making sure that the easement is still granted and in force with all the property owners is going to be really important. I don't know what process. How does that actually happen? What occurs to make sure that that is in place? Mayor Furlong: Mr. Knutson. Roger Knutson: The easements are of record. 1M Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Robert Rabe: Right but after the new. Roger Knutson: They'll remain of record. Robert Rabe: What's that? Roger Knutson: They will remain of record. They can't be extinguished without the, without your approval. Robert Rabe: So are there no, what's the process though? Roger Knutson: There is no process. Kate Aanenson: He's asking can they be re -negotiated. Roger Knutson: Oh you can. Kate Aanenson: All the parties that have an interest in it could. Roger Knutson: Could sit down and re -negotiate something if there's an agreement, sure. Robert Rabe: So that I think has to happen right? Roger Knutson: No. Robert Rabe: So what, there must be some process because it must be a new easement. Roger Knutson: No, there is no new easement. The easement is of record. It's there. It continues. Robert Rabe: So the existing description just gets amended or attached to each of the properties? Is that how it goes? Roger Knutson: It will, their deeds will have to be subject to these easements. The easements are of record and without your approval they cannot be amended. Those easements are permanent. RobertRabe: And so I'm just not aware. So each of the properties will have a deed. It will have a legal description. Does the language of the easement just get basically cut and pasted right into every one of those? Is that how that goes? Roger Knutson: Yes. Robert Rabe: Okay without any change whatsoever. Roger Knutson: Correct. Robert Rabe: Okay. Kate Aanenson: But another option could be, the underlying property owner or the new owner if it got sold could meet with the two other interested parties and construct. 41 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Roger Knutson: They can amend it. Kate Aanenson: Amend it. Robert Rabe: And does the City get involved in that in any way? Roger Knutson: No. Robert Rabe: Not. Okay. Okay. I have concerns but. Mayor Furlong: Mister, help me understand. You've mentioned the northern most parcel of Lot 2. Robert Rabe: Right. Mayor Furlong: And I think you used the word impediment but I want to understand if there are any aspects of this subdivision that they fail to meet the ordinance or? Robert Rabe: Right. So if you were standing on my back steps it would be what, roughly where that bench is right there. Mayor Furlong: Okay. That's where the property line is? Robert Rabe: For the bump out. Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, Robert Rabe: And on that property section, is that a pump house that was? I think that's why it was made like an aberration. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Robert Rabe: Because that pump house has a well that supplies the big barn building down below I believe. That's right, right Naomi? Naomi Carlson: Just a little cottage. Robert Rabe: Okay. And so that pump house is right there and it's you know a story tall and it's kind of cute and all and so I paint it and I you know keep the animals out of it and stuff like that and I have done so for 22 years so to have another property right there, which is uphill about that distance is going to be problematic. I mean it will just be inherently problematic so it needs attention. Mayor Furlong: Mr. Rabe? Councilman Laufenburger: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Furlong: Mr. Laufenburger. 42 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Councilman Laufenburger: Mr. Rabe, so this pump house that you're describing that you've painted, that you've kept the animals out, is that on your property? Robert Rabe: Not officially. It's on, it's in my back yard. Councilman Laufenburger: But is it on your property? Robert Rabe: No. It's within that extension. Councilman Laufenburger. So it belongs to, right now it belongs to Ms. Carlson. Robert Rabe: Correct, yep. Councilman Laufenburger: Thank you. Robert Rabe: But it's not a usable parcel for the person in house number 2. Councilman Laufenburger. But isn't that really the determination of the owner of the lot number 2? Robert Rabe: Depends I guess, right. Whether you want a harmonious neighborhood or not, kind of. I mean it's not wise to plan a neighborhood that might lend itself to a difficulty. It's just not smart. Plus it's really unhandy. I mean it's so far away and higher than the house so. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Could I just ask then what your solution would be to that piece? That parcel you're just talking about. Robert Rabe: I do have some thoughts. I guess I wouldn't rather not state them on record but I think they can be addressed. I don't know who to take it up with though. Is it with Naomi or is it with Ben or the City or how? Mayor Furlong: Well depending on what the thoughts are and not being able to read your mind I think what's being asked for the council this evening is to consider preliminary approval of this subdivision so if it's an issue that the City needs to consider with regard to the subdivision, now would be the opportunity. Robert Rabe: Okay. Mayor Furlong: If it's an issue with the current property owner, you can do that at any time. Robert Rabe: Okay, I did talk to Bob Generous but it wasn't clear what the right approach would be so Ben and I talked a little bit about the access to Teton being moved which is highly unattractive to me. It encroaches on trees. It's you know different lot setting, etc. It's kind of a green space right there and I need it for a buffer against a new house in a large sense but I. Mayor Furlong: And I'm sort', just for clarification. Are you talking about the same northern part of Lot 2? Kate Aanenson: No, he's talking about the driveway right here 43 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Mayor Furlong: Okay. Okay. Kate Aanenson: It's not inside the easement area. Robert Rabe: Right. Mayor Furlong: Okay, so the portion that's outside the easement. Robert Rabe: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. RobertRabe: So the road has been over to the left by 10 feet for 40 years and it's just really unattractive to move that up. The land where, like we've been talking about for the bump out is really high and not accessible. And there's a hedge row in there and everything. The land to the east of there, there's a steep grade down is lower so I think there could be an arrangement where part of that, keeping the same square footage is taken away from the top of the hill with his proximity and moved down, which would be more usable because it's got the right grade. Mayor Furlong: Are you recommending a change in the property ownership and the lot lines? Robert Rabe: Moving of the lines maybe. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And Mr. Knutson if there was an issue of moving lot lines would that be a private matter? That wouldn't be an issue that we could deal with this evening, correct? Roger Knutson: If you want to move a lot line it needs approval of the city. Mayor Furlong: But it would, it would. Roger Knutson: We're not dealing with that. Mayor Furlong: We're not dealing with that tonight. Roger Knutson: No. Mayor Furlong: That would be a separate application. Roger Knutson: Yes. Mayor Furlong: And something that would come from the property owners. Roger Knutson: Yes, Robert Rabe: So it would be a more valuable arrangement for lot number 2 because that is kind of a usable region whereas the top of the hill is really not. But I don't know again how to tackle it. Kate Aanenson: So the impact's on taking off the, the top hat. The chimney on Lot 2 is that it's 65 by 42 so it's like 2,700 square feet. That's what I talk about it impacts the area of the Lot number 2. 44 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Mayor Furlong: But if there was, and I'm just saying here that, that's got to be something negotiated or discussed and agreed to among the property owners, doesn't it? Kate Aanenson: Right. Yeah he's got, he had talked to Bob. There's some things that he can do to work through to resolve that. To still keep that property intact so there's some options that we can do administratively. Mayor Furlong: With the property owners and work with the property owners. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. That's correct. And still maintain this whole lot so. Todd Gerhardt: Kate they need it for impervious surface too. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Yep. So he would still maintain that area but it could be accommodated a couple different ways so which is his objective, which I understand is because he's looking right at it. So he's saying if I could make that go further to the east. Robert Rabe: Correct. And that. Mayor Furlong: But that would be something that is not part of the subdivision before us this evening. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: And it would be something that would be negotiated and discussed among the property owners. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Furlong: First. Kate Aanenson: First. Mayor Furlong: And then if the property owners were in agreement, the City could perhaps administratively. Hopefully administratively. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. That's correct. Throw something out. Mayor Furlong: Could work and help support the property owners. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Robert Rabe: And so that would be in concert with the point at which the easement hits Teton Lane also. Kate Aanenson: Something to work through, yep. Robert Rabe: I mean just in general. Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Robert Rabe: Yeah, I appreciate it. Okay. I think that's it. 45 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Mayor Furlong: Okay. Robert Rabe: If there's any question for me feel free to call. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Robert Rabe: And then so when we say property owners, it's kind of in flux right now. Who are the right people? Naomi? Kate Aanenson: Well the current owner would have to turn over the rights to the future owner so you kind of have both to negotiate with. Robert Rabe: Okay. Okay, thank you. Mayor Furlong: Ahight, thank you. Is there anyone else that would like to provide public comment this evening? Okay, thank you. Let's bring it back to council then for any follow up questions. Or comments. Any thoughts or comments on this? Otherwise I can start with just a couple and see if anybody wants to add. I think as I started out we're dealing with a property here that is non -conforming. It's zoned for residential but it's clearly not a residential use and that has caused some challenges for the neighboring properties and I know there's been many discussions here at City Hall as well trying to work with the property owners to try to come up with ways that, to find that right balance as I mentioned before. To me this subdivision is the best alternative to finding ways to illuminate some of the challenges that have existed before. I think we've spent a lot of time talking about easements. There are clearly property rights along, within that casement line that are owned by the properties to the north and the key here from my standpoint is to make sure that this subdivision doesn't infringe upon those rights. Might it change the way the easement or the property is used from where it has been before? Perhaps. That may happen but as long as there isn't an obstruction to the access easement, I think that's clearly the decision in front of us this evening. I do appreciate staffs willingness to work with the property owners and see if there can be some accommodations with regard to Lot 2. The driveway access but again you know the easement provides rights outside that easement. The rights are limited or nonexistent so I think when I look at this, the variance requests are reasonable and appropriate because of the uniqueness of this property and are helping from a public benefit standpoint the elimination of a non -conformity of this property currently so all things considered, and there are many things to consider. It seems to me that this is an overall win for everyone concerned. It may not be perfect. It may not be exactly what everybody might want the property to do but ultimately we've talked a lot about property rights this evening and the property owner has a right to develop their property and subdivide it within the ordinances. That's what we're looking at here this evening and I think it has been a challenge to get to this point and I thank everyone involved. The developer. Property owners. The neighbors. The staff for slugging through this and trying to make sure that we get, in the end four new homes. Four new families. Four new neighbors that are going to be coming into this neighborhood and being a part of the city of Chanhassen and that's what I think long term the positive that we're looking at so from my standpoint I want to thank everybody for their involvement but also recommend to the council that we do move forward with this as being recommended by staff and the Planning Commission. Though certainly I'd be open to other comments as well. Mr. Laufenburger. Councilman Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Mayor. I would agree. I think this is good news for the neighborhood. I do support the variances and I think it's important just a comment on future presentation Kate. The screen that I'm looking at right now, I believe that the dot dash line that we see in Lot l . Kate Aanenson: Oh here. 46 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Councilman Laufenburger: Yeah. The dot dash line that, there. That line. That is the line that depicts the setbacks required with current ordinances, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That is correct. Councilman Laufenburger. Yeah. It would be nice to have a little red line that moves that bottom line down 10 feet to show okay this then becomes the envelope. The buildable area and the truth is once we approve the variance, which I do support, then the builder can build anywhere within that, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Councilman Laufenburger: Okay, so I think that perhaps might have provided a little clarity for Mr. Rabe when, with his question so that's just a thought for the future. Kate Aanenson: Sure. Councilman Laufenburger: And just the last thing, and this is I'm probably out of bounds in saying this but, I don't think we can ordinance harmony in the neighborhood. I don't think that's a, it doesn't mean it's not a responsibility but I think the primary responsibility for harmony in the neighborhood lies with those in the neighborhood so as much as I listen to and hear the dissonance that is created, I think that this step on the part of the owner to subdivide for residential lots, I think there's a great opportunity for incredible harmony in the neighborhood and I think that's probably what the owner and the developer is looking for. And then one last question Ms. Aanenson. You described this current usage of this lot as nonconforming. Legally non -conforming, is that the right term? Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Councilman Laufenburger: What action on the part of the City, if anything, made this a legally non- conforming lot? Kate Aanenson: When we rezoned it to residential. Councilman Laufenburger: And when did we do that? Kate Aanenson: In the staff report it was in 1986. Councilman Laufenburger: So there's nothing that this property owner has done to earn the scorn of the City that they don't have residential lots there because what they, they built the lot in accordance with the zoning that was in place when they built it. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Councilman Laufenburger: Alright, okay. So thank you Ms. Aanenson. That's all I have Mr. Mayor. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any other thoughts or comments? Councilwoman Tjomhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Mr. Mayor, I remember one of my first times on council, I won't talk about how long ago, sometimes some city businesses like making sausage you don't always want to know how it's done but you hope that it turns out well in the end and I think this is a perfect example of what you explained to me. I think we have a parcel that was nonconforming and way back in it's time it served it's purpose. I believe it was a farm and then also housed or housed people maybe or it was businesses. 47 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Small businesses so it did have a purpose there and now I think it's kind of come full circle where now it's going to become residential and I believe harmony will be found once that does happen but it just, it's going to take a while to get there. It's going to take a lot to get through those growing pains and you know a lot of those growing pains come from the unknown and some of those unknown elements obviously are the easements. These are binding easements that you have that you've privately used this property for years and years and so hopefully within time everybody will become comfortable with how everything will turn out when it comes to the use of these easements. That everyone will still have reasonable access to their property and let's hope that at one point all these four houses will use these easements to go visit each other and be a neighborhood. I don't know when it's going to happen but I have a, I'm optimistic that at one point this will happen. And so I too am in favor of the variances and I really do look forward to seeing how everything turns out and I look forward to maybe National Night Out 2 years from now checking it out and having a glass of lemonade with everybody so thank you. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any other comments? Councilwoman Ernst: Sure. Mayor Furlong: Councilwoman Ernst. Councilwoman Ernst: So it's sounds based on all the information that I've heard tonight that some of the neighbors really got caught up in a change that happened some time ago and were, it basically was out of their control but I'm hoping that the neighbors can collaborate and work together to figure this out and it sounds like staff is willing to work with the neighbors once there's some consensus there and hopefully move forward. That's all. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Appreciate everybody's comments and again thank you to everybody that's been involved in this. It's been a challenge for all concerned and I know that but we're grateful for the work that you've done because of the comments that you've heard tonight. I think long term in the big picture this is a great step forward for the neighborhood. As Councilwoman Tjornhom mentioned that maybe some growing pains still as we go through the demolition and the construction but hopefully everybody can work together for the greater good. With that I will certainly entertain a motion. Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I can do that. Mr. Mayor I'd like to make a motion that the Chanhassen City Council approves the preliminary plat creating four lots, approves the hard cover variance of Lots 1 and 3 of 7.4 percent and 3.2 percent respectively as well as the front setback variance for Lot 1 of 10 feet (20 foot front setback on Bretton Way). Subject to the conditions of the staff report and adopts the Findings of Fact. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is there a second? Councilman Laufenburger: Second. Mayor Furlong: Motion's been made and seconded. Is there any discussion on the motion? Hearing none we'll proceed with the vote. Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman Lanfenburger seconded that the Chanhassen City Council approves the preliminary plat creating four lots, approves the hard cover variances for Lots 1 and 3 of 7.4 percent (32A% hardcover) and 3.2 percent (28.2% hard cover respectively), as well as the front setback variance for Lot 1 of 10 feet (20 foot front setback on Bretton Way), subject to the following conditions and adoption of the Findings of Fact: 48 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 Subdivision with setback and hardeover variances: Building: 1. Appropriate permit(s) required for the demolition or moving of any existing structures. 2. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits can be issued. 3. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 4. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. En ineering: 1. The easements per Documents T15149 and T17882 must be extinguished prior to final plat approval. 2. Prior to final plat submittal the developer shall coordinate with the gas company to verify the location of the gas line. If the gas line is not within an existing easement the developer must provide and dedicate the necessary easement or relocate the gas line to lie within an easement area in accordance to CenterPoint Energy's specifications. 3. The drainage and utility easements on the north side of Lots 1 and 3 can be reduced to 10 feet. 4. Any portion of the gravel surface on the north side of the property that is disturbed with this development shall be paved. 5. It is the developer's responsibility to coordinate access to the gravel surface with the affected residents during construction. 6. The proposed retaining wall shall comply with the following: a) A building permit is required, b) The design shall comply with the Minnesota Department of Transportation standards for retaining walls, c) The drainage design for the wall shall consider the surface runoff that will sheet drain towards the wall, d) The wall crosses over property lines and therefore it shall be built in conjunction with the subdivision and a homeowners association must be formed to own and maintain the wall, e) An encroachment agreement will be required before the retaining wall building permit is issued if the retaining wall is to be installed within the platted drainage and utility easement. f) The developer shall ensure that the wall construction does not compromise the private sanitary sewer service or the gas line in the area. g) The developer shall install a barrier (fence, berm, landscaping or other barrier) between the private gravel street and the top of the retaining wall. 49 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 7. All driveways within the development shall meet the 10% maximum driveway slope. The developer is encouraged to consider a driveway design that many homeowners desire which includes a landing (typically 3%) at each end of the driveway (at the street and at the garage). 8. Sewer and water services to each of the proposed four lots were installed by the Curry Farms 21 Addition developer; therefore, the sewer and water lateral fees do not apply. 9. Prior to final plat approval the developer shall identify which of the four lots will receive the City SAC and City WAC credit. 10. The remaining three lots shall be subject to the City SAC and WAC, 30% of which will be collected with the final plat at the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. 11. All lots are subject to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Sanitary Access Charge (MCES SAC), which is paid with the building permit. 12. A portion of the private sanitary sewer service to the home located on 6281 Teton Lane will encroach into the platted drainage and utility easement; therefore, an encroachment agreement is required. Natural Resources: 1. Tree protection fencing will be required at the edge of grading limits near any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading. 2. Trees required to be planted are as follows: Lot 1 — 5 trees, Lot 2 — 2 trees, Lot 3 — 4 trees, Lot 4 — 7 trees. Plannine: 1. The developer shall perform a phase I environmental audit on the property surrounding the commercial building prior to recording the final plat. 2. The existing buildings on the property, including sheds, house and the long building must be demolished prior to recording of the final plat. 3. A ten -foot building setback from the access easement (Doc. No. 14111 and 14055) is required. 4. The developer shall work with the neighboring property owners to clarify the use, permitted users and maintenance responsibility of the easement. Specifically, the easement must assure that the property owner for Lot 2 may access the rear of their property via this easement. The developer shall ensure that the necessary easement is in place so that the future property owner of Lot 2 can access the northern tip of the property. A revised easement document shall be recorded with the plat. Water Resources: 1. The applicant shall either procure a drainage and utility easement over the entirety of the culvert or they shall install a catch basin manhole in Bretton Way just west of the driveway for Lot 4 and tie this into the existing public storm sewer system. In either event, the applicant shall model the conveyance choice to assure adequate capacity and provide a safe and stable emergency overflow. 2. The applicant must provide clarification to resolve the disparate impervious surface calculations and assure adequate volume reduction. 50 Chanhassen City Council — October 13, 2014 3. The applicant shall provide infiltration/water quality volume adequate to address the volume reduction requirements for the runoff from all impervious surfaces in the development. 4. The applicant must provide a detail of the rain gardens which is consistent with the recommendations and requirements of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual before final plat approval. 5. The applicant shall provide a detailed planting schedule for the rain garden areas. 6. The applicant shall provide a hydrograph showing the duration of ponding is less than 48 hours and shall reduce the ponding depth so the bounce does not exceed MN Storm Water Manual guidance or correct the soils and demonstrate that they are commensurate with HSG A or B soils. 7. The side slopes into the rain gardens shall not exceed three horizontal feet for every one vertical foot. 8. Discharge velocities into the rain gardens shall not exceed four cubic feet per second or the applicant shall provide scour calculations and adequate energy dissipation to assure erosion will not be an issue. 9. Pre-treatment shall be provided to minimisediment deposition into the rain gardens. 10. Drain tile services must be provided to all properties that will flow from the back to the front of the lot. 11. Erosion Control plan /SWPPP must include all elements required under Chapter 19 of City Code. 12. Engineer estimate of quantities for erosion control and sediment prevention, including those necessary for final site stabilization, shall be provided and used to calculate escrow amount. 13. A Storm Water Management Utility fee estimated to be $9,168.00 shall be paid with final plat. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Mayor Furlong: Thank you everybody. APPROVE CONTRACT FOR TH 101 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PRELEM NARY DESIGN. Paul Oehme: Thank you Mayor, City Council members. Let me bring up the power point presentation herethat I have. I'd like to maybe just go through a little bit of background on how we came to this point for 101. Back in 2006-2007, if you recall the City entered into a contract with MnDOT and Carver County to help fund the corridor study along 101 south of Lyman Boulevard. This was basically right after 212 was constructed and at that time the City was concerned about you know when 212 came in the additional traffic out in this area and the safety issues that were known at that time with the corridor so that study was completed in 2007. Since then 101 has been improved from Lyman Boulevard down to Pioneer Trail and actually back in August of this year that section of roadway was improved. This was another joint project between Carver County, MnDOT and also federal funds were also available. Made available for this project to make the improvements at that time. We took out steep curves. Blind intersections. Straighten out the road as best as we can. We had neighborhood meetings associated with that project and built it to a 4 lane design. We had a lot of residents and citizens concerned about the project itself. The impacts to the boulevard or to the area with tree loss and how the alignment was going to work. Since that time we've heard some really positive comments from the neighbors and others in, that have commented back to city staff how well that project turned out. Just this year we started 51 ILA-O% Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2014-08 Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized known Chaska Herald Chanhassen Vil- N O T I C E agent of the publisher of the newspapers as the and the IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal September 16, 2014, at 7:06 newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as P.M. in the Council Chambers amended. in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Blvd. Thepurposeof this �� 7Market (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. hearing is to consider a request for Preliminary Plat Review was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said for a four -lot subdivision Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of with variances for hard cover and the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both setback on 1.51 acres of property inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition zoned Single Family Residential and publication of the Notice: (RSF) and located at 6397 and 6411 Bretton Way - FRETHAM abcdefghijklmnoT 19TH kewest Development Applicant: Lakewest Development, LLC.Owner: Naomi Carlson.A plan showing the location of the proposal is available Laurie A. Hartmann for public review on the City, web site at wwwci.chanhassen. mn.usi2014-08 or at City Hall during regular business hours. Subscribed and sworn before me on All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with tA.� �I� this day of 014 Mpect to this proposal. Robert Generous, AICP, Senior Planner Email: bgener ci.charrhassen.mn.us m.us JYMME JEANNE l TE BARK Phone: 952-227-1131 NO'ARy PI;BJC - AiNNESO'A Fe (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, September N b is IIYCOMMM NDP:NES01.fJV'8 4. 2014: No. 4007 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter :................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.59 per column inch SCANNED 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone:952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone:952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone.952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Website www.d.chanhassen.mm.us TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: October 13, 2014 pK-1117 SUBJ: Fretham 19"' Addition — Preliminary plat review for a four -lot subdivision with variances for hard cover and setback Planning Case #2014-08 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the preliminary plat creating four lots, approves the hard cover variances for Lots 1 and 3 of 7.4 percent (32.4 % hardcover) and 3.2 percent (28.2% hard cover), respectively, as well as the front setback variance for Lot 1 of 10 feet (20-foot front setback on Bretton Way) subject to the conditions of the staff report, and adopts the Findings of Fact. City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to create four single-family lots with a variance from the 25 percent hardcover for Lots 1 and 3 to accommodate the existing driveway easement for the properties to the north, and a setback variance for Lot 1 to move the buildable area away from the existing driveway which serves the property to the northeast. The hard cover request is to permit 32.4 percent impervious surface on Lot 1 and 28.2 percent impervious surface on Lot 3. The setback variance is to permit a 20-foot setback from Bretton Way for Lot 1. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 16, 2014 to review the development. The Planning Commission voted 7 — 0 on a motion recommending approval of the project. Planning Commission discussed the issue of storm water runoff from the property. The final design for the water detention areas will be prepared prior to approval of the final plat. They also discussed the issue of accessing lot 1 from Teton Lane rather than Bretton Way. There is significant elevation change on lot 1 from the northwest to southeast and locating the house with access to the west makes most sense from site grading, drainage and house location standpoints. A SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Todd Gerhardt Fretham 10 Addition October 13, 2014 Page 2 The Planning Commission minutes for September 16, 2014 are included in the City Council packet for October 13, 2014. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval the Fretham 19'h Addition preliminary plat with variances for hard cover on Lots 1 and 3 and a front yard setback variance from Bretton Way for Lot 1 subject to the conditions of the Planning Commission staff report and adoption of the Planning Commission Findings of Fact. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated 9/16/14. gAplan\2014 planning cases\2014-08 8etham 19th addition\exmutive summary.doc PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the preliminary plat creating four lots, approve the hard cover variances for Lots 1 and 3 of 7.4 percent (32.4 % hardcover) and 3.2 percent (28.2% hard cover), respectively, as well as the front setback variance for Lot 1 of 10 feet (20-foot front setback on Bretton Way) subject to the conditions of the staff report and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting preliminary plat review for a four -lot subdivision with variances for hard cover and setback. The plan set was prepared by Campion Engineering Services, Inc. dated January 3, 2014 and last revised August 11, 2014. These plans were submitted on behalf of the applicant Lakewest Development and were received by the City of Chanhassen on August 15, 2014. The plan set included six pages and a stormwater management design summary. The plan set did not include a drainage map showing pre- and post -development drainage areas. LOCATION: 6397 and 6411 Bretton Way ,y PID 25-6820030 & 25-6940030 tJ� APPLICANT: Lakewest Development, LLC. Naomi Carlson Ben Wikstrom 6411 Bretton Way 14525 Highway 7, Suite 102 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Minnetonka, MN 55345 (952)653-2189 ben@iwestdev.com PRESENT ZONING: Single -Family Residential District, RSF 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (net density 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 1.51 acres DENSITY: 2.65 units per acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Planning Commission Fretham 19d' Addition —Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 2 of 17 The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to create four single-family lots with a variance from the 25 percent hardcover for Lots 1 and 3, and a setback variance for Lot 1 to move the buildable area away from the existing driveway which serves the property to the northeast. The hard cover request is to permit 32.4 percent impervious surface on Lot 1 and 28.2 percent impervious surface on Lot 3. The setback variance is to permit a 20-foot setback from Bretton Way for Lot 1. Redevelopment of these parcels with new single-family homes would be beneficial to this neighborhood and the community and eliminate a non -conforming use. Site Information There were no indications that any jurisdictional wetlands exist on site. The site does not have any bluff conditions. The property drains to Christmas Lake but is just outside of the 1000-foot overlay district. Currently the site has two buildings and a gravel drive and parking surface with limited tree cover. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article XII, "RSF" Single -Family Residential District BACKGROUND On March 11, 2013 the Chanhassen City Council approved the change in nonconfornung uses at 6411 Bretton Way and adopted performance standards as a guide to the continuing use of the building. The Chanhassen City Council approved Curry Farms 2nd Addition on July 15, 1988. RLS 105 dated 6/17/1988 creates the parcel around the building containing commercial uses. 1986 — Property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) from Rla (residential agricultural). 1970s — Precision Manufacturing Company, parts manufacturing, tool and die. Planning Commission Fretham 19`s Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 3 of 17 September 16, 1964 — Registered Land Survey 28 creates the parcels containing the house and buildings as well as many of the parcels in the neighborhood. SUBDIVISION The applicant is requesting subdivision approval to create four single-family lots with variance requests for front yard setback from Bretton Way on Lot 1 and hard cover variances for Lots I and 3. I I 'S I EASEMENTS AND PRELIMINARY PLAT There are several existing easements within the project boundary: 1. Easement for utility purposes for Northwestern Bell Telephone dedicated in 1956. Staff has not received a copy of this easement and therefore unable to determine if the project proposal conflicts with this easement. 2. Deed easement dated August 2, 1969. This easement is along the northwestern 14 feet of the property in favor of 6305 Teton Lane. This is not a public easement. Planning Commission Fretham 19d' Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 4 of 17 b�o5 Tc+m ! �a zs \ter• t - - — =00R 3. Deed easement dated September 16, 1969. This easement is along the northern 14 feet of the property in favor or 6281 Teton Lane. This is not a public easement. A sanitary sewer service to 6281 Teton Lane also lies within this easement. --------------- fnZ91 1 � 77 s Planning Commission Fretham 19t' Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 5 of 17 4. Easement for ingress and egress purposes dated January 30, 1971, document T15149. This is not a public easement. This easement conflicts with the building pads shown on Lots 3 and 4. A portion of this easement lies within the Bretton Way right of way, therefore, this easement must be extinguished prior to final plat approval. - - - - - - - - I, , i F�'.•elis ---- '�—�� ._ _ FleErwut isrr, unrerao� iwa �°c ¢'sy- �SL:�1:S t/+�N'eSr M8AYl1 •miw wi. s 5. Easement for road purposes dated December 21, 1972, document T17882. This is not a public easement. This easement conflicts with the proposed building pad on Lot 2. A portion of this easement lies within the Bretton Way right of way, therefore, this easement must be extinguished prior to final plat approval. Planning Commission Fretham 19' Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 6 of 17 ---------- !I II' 1 17 1 1 1 , r 1 1 � 1 � r>�rluu+crx or.ome.e. _� rte� y3E- - =iiR: uiawearo�seaar �s� CenterPoint Energy reviewed the proposal and indicated that a gas line with four services extends along the northern portion of the subject property, as shown in blue below (approximate parcel boundaries shown in yellow). There is no evidence of an easement that covers this gas line in its entirety. Prior to final plat submittal the developer shall coordinate with the gas company to verify the location of the gas line. If the gas line is not within an existing easement, the developer must provide and dedicate the necessary easement or relocate the gas line to he within an easement area in accordance to CenterPoint Energy's specifications. Planning Commission Fretham 190' Addition -Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 7 of 17 The oversized perimeter drainage and utility easements on the north side of Lots 1 and 3 are not necessary. These easements can be reduced to 10 feet. STREETS AND ACCESS Access to three of the proposed lots will be from Bretton Way with the fourth lot off of Teton Lane, 31-foot wide public streets within a 50-foot wide right of ways. These streets were constructed with the Curry Farms TO Addition improvements; therefore, no public road improvements are proposed or required with this development. A portion of the existing private gravel surface on the north side of the property is not within the deeded easements; therefore, the developer proposes to relocate these portions so that they are within the easement area. Additionally, a portion of the gravel surface on Lot 1 is proposed to be disturbed for grading purposes. Any portion of the gravel surface that is disturbed with this development shall be paved. It is the developer's responsibility to coordinate access to the gravel surface with the affected residents during construction. GRADING AND DRAINAGE AND RETAINING WALLS The developer proposes to mass grade the site. The site drops between 14 and 34 feet from the north to the south. Due to the severity of the grades the developer proposes to construct a 305- foot long retaining wall on the north side of the property. The maximum height of this wall is 12 feet and shall comply with the following: 1. A building permit is required, 2. The design shall comply with the Minnesota Department of Transportation standards for retaining walls, 3. The drainage design for the wall shall consider the surface runoff that will sheet drain towards the wall, Planning Commission Fretham 19a' Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 8 of 17 4. The wall crosses over property lines and therefore it shall be built in conjunction with the subdivision and a homeowners association must be formed to own and maintain the wall, S. An encroachment agreement will be required before the retaining wall building permit is issued if the retaining wall is to be installed within the platted drainage and utility easement. 6. It appears that the construction of the wall will encroach into both of the deeded easements. The developer shall ensure that the wall construction does not compromise the private sanitary sewer service or the gas line in the area. 7. The developer shall install a barrier (fence, berm, landscaping or other barrier) between the private gravel street and the top of the retaining wall. The driveway grades on Lots 1 and 2 appear to exceed the 10% maximum allowed by ordinance. All driveways within the development shall meet the 10% maximum driveway slope. The developer is encouraged to consider a driveway design that many homeowners desire which includes a landing (typically 3%) at each end of the driveway (at the street and at the garage). The submittal does not include a drainage map as is required. The applicant must submit the drainage map prior to any final plat approvals. A review of city GIS data indicates that the majority of the site (DA2 and DA3) drains from north by northwest to southeast with much of this drainage area going into a culvert under the driveway at 6421 Bretton Way. This culvert does not have a drainage and utility easement and is not part of the public storm sewer system. The remainder of this drainage area drains to Bretton Way where the storm water is collected in the gutter and directed into the catch basin manholes in front of 6431 Bretton Way before discharging into pond CL-P 1.12 south and east of the subject property and subsequently discharging into the channel draining to Christmas Lake. This channel is deeply incised and has significant headcutting as a result of the flashy nature of the flow through the channel, as well as the sheer volume of runoff. It is important that the Figure 1-Subject property existing drainage conditions private culvert and the downstream conditions are taken into consideration with the development of this site. The most extreme westerly portion of the property drains to the catch basin manhole at the comer of Teton Lane and Bretton Way and is routed south before entering the same pond before discharging to Christmas Lake. Under the proposed conditions, it appears that the drainage areas remain relatively consistent in direction. The routing will change slightly as the development proposes to incorporate two (2) rain gardens with three (3) culverts providing conveyance between the features. The applicant is proposing to direct a significant portion of the site drainage to the private culvert under the driveway at 6421 Bretton Way. The discharge should be brought to a public system where the City has the ability to access and maintain the conveyance for public benefit. To this end, the applicant shall either procure a drainage and utility easement over the entirety of the culvert or Planning Commission Fretham 19`h Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 9 of 17 they shall install a catch basin manhole in Bretton Way just west of the driveway for Lot 4 and tie this into the existing public storm sewer system. If the applicant chooses to procure an easement to the benefit of the city, the culvert must be modeled to assure adequate capacity exists to handle the ten (10) year storm event and provide for a safe and stable emergency overflow. The other area of concern is regarding of the drive in the easement north of Lot 1. The proposed condition will direct water at the back of the house. The applicant must redesign the drainage to avoid this condition or provide evidence, satisfactory to city staff, that the condition will not have deleterious effects on the property. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The applicant is proposing to use two rain gardens to provide volume reduction for the first 1. inch of rainfall and to meet water quality standards. Staff has reviewed the assumptions regarding post -development impervious surface coverage as it pertains to required infiltration volume and finds the impervious surface calculations confusing and disparate. Some of the discrepancies are shown in the following table. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREAS — Per Stormwater Management Summary Subcatchment Areas PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREAS —Per Preliminary Plat (Sheet No. 3 of 6) Subcatch Impervious - SF Gravel* - SF Existing Drive Proposed House, etc 2S 609 568 Lot 1 2,987 2,763 3S 3,707 2,247 Lot 2 813 2,970 4S 3,197 954 Lot 3 1,605 3,199 5S 3,945 1,847 Lot 50 3,535 6S 778 122 SUM 5,455" 12,467 (0.286 ac SUM 12,236 0.281 ac 5,73e COMBINED IMPERVIOUS 17,974 SF 0.413ac COMBINED IMPERVIOUS 17,922 SF 0.411 ac Table 1. Impervious areas discrepancies as shown on preliminary plat and in stormwater summary. *Gravel is considered impervious. To remain consistent with the nomenclature used in the Stormwater Design Management Summary it has been included in a separate column. ''Mese numbers should be equal as they are both based off the same development scenario The calculated impervious from the storm water management summary is not consistent with the proposed impervious shown on the preliminary plat sheet. Further, when compared to the numbers on the Existing Conditions and Removal Plan (Sheet 2 of 6) which shows a combined impervious surface area of 17,985 square feet, there is an even larger discrepancy. The applicant must provide clarification to resolve the disparate impervious surface calculations and assure adequate volume reduction. Planning Commission Fretham 10 Addition —Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 10 of 17 Regardless of the final overall impervious surface calculations, the proposed water quality volume is inadequate for any of the three calculated areas shown within the plan (17,922 SF to 17,985 SF). The water quality volume provided for appears to be adequate to address 1.1 inches of runoff from 0.28 acres or approximately 12,200 square feet. Given the applicant has calculated the impervious surface area to be 12,236 SF (0.281 acres) it seems apparent that this area was used to calculate necessary infiltration/water quality volume and that the gravel drive was discounted from the calculations. However, the infiltration/water quality volume should accommodate runoff from all impervious surfaces. This is as much as 1,800 cubic feet depending upon what the actual total impervious surface area is. The proposed stormwater management only provides an infiltration/water quality volume of 1,305 cubic feet. Because of the known downstream issues and the request for a variance from the 25% hardcover requirement, the need to provide adequate volume reduction becomes more paramount. The applicant shall provide infiltration/water quality volume adequate to address the volume reduction Figure 2 - Exposed sanitary sewer within channel to requirements for the runoff from all impervious Christmas Lake downstream of site surfaces in the development. The applicant must provide a detail of the rain gardens which is consistent with the recommendations and requirements of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual before final plat approval. This should include engineered soils, underdrains if any are proposed, energy dissipation at the culverts, cross -sectional profile views, emergency overflow stabilization, planting schedule, and any other appurtenant features. The proposed rain gardens bounce up to 23 inches. The Minnesota Storm Water Manual requires that the rain gardens draw down within 48 hours and that Hydrologic Soils Group (HSG) C soil have a maximum ponding depth of 9.6 inches. The applicant shall provide a hydrograph showing the duration of ponding and shall reduce the ponding depth so the bounce does not exceed MN Storm Water Manual guidance or correct the soils and demonstrate that they are commensurate with HSG A or B soils. The culverts and rain gardens will be privately owned and maintained. The applicant must provide an operations and maintenance manual as well as describe who will be responsible for the maintenance of the rain gardens and what assurances will be in place. The responsible party must submit bi-annual reports to the Water Resources Coordinator every spring and fall. The City has developed template operations and maintenance manuals and inspection forms which they will make available to the applicant upon request. Drain tile services must be provided to all properties that will flow from the back to the front of the lot. Planning Commission Fretham 10 Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 1 I of 17 GRADING AND EROSION PREVENTION/SEDIMENT CONTROL The total disturbance will exceed the minimum one acre threshold and will require a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Construction Permit. The applicant has developed a preliminary Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan. This plan does not have all the required elements and must be amended to include these elements prior to final approval. The most noteworthy elements absent from the SWPPP include the following: 1. Quantity of erosion prevention and sediment control materials. This shall include all topsoil, engineered soils and final vegetation establishment. 2. List of persons responsible for the SWPPP design, SWPPP implementation, and day to day site operations. 3. Sequencing of all site activities. It is particularly important that they identify when the rain gardens will be constructed and how they will be protected throughout the life of the project. 4. Pre -construction and post -construction drainage boundaries. 5. Receiving waters including distance and direction. This is not intended to be an exhaustive list of required elements. The applicant must review the NPDES permit and assure that all required elements are included in the SWPPP prior to final plat approval. The applicant must include all elements required under Chapter 19 of City Code. Most noteworthy is the requirement of six inches of topsoil. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN Sanitary sewer and water main were installed within Bretton Way in conjunction with the Curry Farms 2"d Addition improvements. Sewer and water services to each of the proposed four lots were installed by the Curry Farms 2"d Addition developer; therefore, the sewer and water lateral fees do not apply. One City Sanitary Sewer Access Charge (City SAC) and one City Water Access Charge (City WAC) were assessed to the property in 1990 and have been paid. Prior to final plat approval the developer shall identify which of the four lots receive the City SAC and City WAC credit. The remaining three lots shall be subject to the City SAC and WAC, 30% of which will be collected with the final plat at the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. All lots are subject to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Sanitary Access Charge (MCES SAC), which is paid with the building permit. A portion of the private sanitary sewer service to the home located on 6281 Teton Lane will encroach into the platted drainage and utility easement; therefore, an encroachment agreement is required. Planning Commission Fretham 19d' Addition —Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 12 of 17 LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION The applicant has submitted tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations. They are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 1.51 ac. or 65,775 SF Baseline canopy coverage 25% or 16,443 SF Minimum canopy coverage allowed 30% or 19,732 SF Proposed tree preservation 5% or 3267 SF Developer does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed; therefore, the difference between the baseline and proposed tree preservation is multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required replacement plantings. Difference in canopy coverage 16,465 SF Multiplier 1.2 Total replacement 19,758 SF Total number of trees to be planted 18 trees The total number of trees required for the development is 18. Applicant has proposed a total of 18 trees planted throughout the 4 lots. There are no bufferyard requirements for this subdivision. MISCELLANEOUS The existing buildings on the property, including sheds, house and the long building will need to be demolished prior to recording of the final plat since accessory buildings are not permitted without a principal structure and the buildings will be located across lot lines. Appropriate permit(s) are required for the demolition or moving of any existing structures. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits can be issued. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. Since the site has been used for some industrial and commercial uses in the past including machining operations, tool and die and painting, it would behoove the developer to perform an environmental audit of the property to determine if there are any environmental issues that need to be addressed. The developer shall perform a phase I environmental audit on property surrounding the commercially used building. The developer shall ensure that the necessary easement is in place so that the future property owner of Lot 2 can access the northern tip of the property. Staff foresees this area being used for permissible storage on Lot 2. Planning Commission Fretham 19`h Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 13 of 17 COMPLIANCE TABLE Areas . ft. Frontage ft. Depth (ft.) Notes Code 15,000 90 125 Lot 1 17,771 97 199 Corner lot Lot 2 15,431 120 202 Lot 3 17,034 91 162 Lot 4 15,469 73 @ 186 TOTAL 65,705 1.51 acres L 90 feet at the building setback line permitted on cul-de-sac bubble. VARIANCE The applicant is requesting variances to permit hard cover of up to 32.4 percent for Lot 1 and 28.2 percent for Lot 3. The reason for the hard cover variance is to accommodate the existing hard cover for the driveway serving the property to the northeast. The permissible hard cover for Lot 1 is 4,443 square feet. The existing driveway across Lot 1 is 2,987 square feet which represents 16.8 percent of the impervious surface on the property. This would permit an additional 1,456 square feet of impervious surface. With the variance, Lot 1 would be permitted a total of 5,750 square feet of hard cover, an increase of 1,307 square feet of permissible hard cover. The permissible hard cover for Lot 3 is 4,258 square feet. The existing driveway across Lot 3 is 1,605 square feet which represents 9.4 percent of the impervious surface on the property. This would permit an additional 2,653 square feet of impervious surface. With the variance, Lot 3 would be permitted a total of 4,804 square feet, an increase of 546 square feet in permissible hard cover. Short of eliminating one lot from the development, staff is unaware of any way to permit the subdivision of this land without granting a variance. Each lot meets or exceeds the required lot standards for single-family residential lots. If the developer could remove the private street/driveway access to the lot to the northeast, then there would not be a need for a hard cover variance. However, this easement is to the benefit of that property owner and currently provides their only means of access to their property. The second variance request is to permit a 20-foot front yard setback from Bretton Way for Lot 1. This variance would permit additional separation from the building to the driveway. Staff is proposing that a minimum 10-foot setback be required from the easement to provide sufficient snow storage. Staff has evaluated the potential of moving the home to the east on Lot 1 and providing access to Bretton Way. However, the house design for this property is a side -loaded garage which has a different configuration then a front -entry garage, which does not appear to fit on the lot without the variance either. Planning Commission Fretham 19'b Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 14 of 17 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed development subject to the following conditions and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Subdivision with setback and hardcover variances: Building: 1. Appropriate permit(s) required for the demolition or moving of any existing structures. 2. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits can be issued. 3. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 4. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. Engineering: 1. The easements per Documents T15149 and T17882 must be extinguished prior to final plat approval. 2. Prior to final plat submittal the developer shall coordinate with the gas company to verify the location of the gas line. If the gas line is not within an existing easement the developer must provide and dedicate the necessary easement or relocate the gas line to lie within an easement area in accordance to CenterPoint Energy's specifications. 3. The drainage and utility easements on the north side of Lots 1 and 3 can be reduced to 10 feet. 4. Any portion of the grave] surface on the north side of the property that is disturbed with this development shall be paved. 5. It is the developer's responsibility to coordinate access to the gravel surface with the affected residents during construction. 6. The proposed retaining wall shall comply with the following: a) A building permit is required, b) The design shall comply with the Minnesota Department of Transportation standards for retaining walls, c) The drainage design for the wall shall consider the surface runoff that will sheet drain towards the wall, Planning Commission Fretham 19' Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 15 of 17 d) The wall crosses over property lines and therefore it shall be built in conjunction with the subdivision and a homeowners association must be formed to own and maintain the wall, e) An encroachment agreement will be required before the retaining wall building permit is issued if the retaining wall is to be installed within the platted drainage and utility easement. f) The developer shall ensure that the wall construction does not compromise the private sanitary sewer service or the gas line in the area. g) The developer shall install a barrier (fence, berm, landscaping or other barrier) between the private gravel street and the top of the retaining wall. 7. All driveways within the development shall meet the 10% maximum driveway slope. The developer is encouraged to consider a driveway design that many homeowners desire which includes a landing (typically 3%) at each end of the driveway (at the street and at the garage). 8. Sewer and water services to each of the proposed four lots were installed by the Curry Farms 2nd Addition developer; therefore, the sewer and water lateral fees do not apply. 9. Prior to final plat approval the developer shall identify which of the four lots will receive the City SAC and City WAC credit. 10. The remaining three lots shall be subject to the City SAC and WAC, 30% of which will be collected with the final plat at the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. 11. All lots are subject to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Sanitary Access Charge (MCES SAC), which is paid with the building permit. 12. A portion of the private sanitary sewer service to the home located on 6281 Teton Lane will encroach into the platted drainage and utility easement; therefore, an encroachment agreement is required. Natural Resources: 1. Tree protection fencing will be required at the edge of grading limits near any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading. 2. Trees required to be planted are as follows: Lot 1 — 5 trees, Lot 2 — 2 trees, Lot 3 — 4 trees, Lot 4 — 7 trees. Plannine: 1. The developer shall perform a phase I environmental audit on the property surrounding the commercial building prior to recording the final plat. 2. The existing buildings on the property, including sheds, house and the long building must be demolished prior to recording of the final plat. Planning Commission Fretham 19's Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 16 of 17 A ten -foot building setback from the access easement (Doc. No. 14111 and 14055) is required. 4. The developer shall work with the neighboring property owners to clarify the use, permitted users and maintenance responsibility of the easement. Specifically, the easement must assure that the property owner for Lot 2 may access the rear of their property via this easement. The developer shall ensure that the necessary easement is in place so that the future property owner of Lot 2 can access the northern tip of the property. A revised easement document shall be recorded with the plat. Water Resources: The applicant shall either procure a drainage and utility easement over the entirety of the culvert or they shall install a catch basin manhole in Bretton Way just west of the driveway for Lot 4 and tie this into the existing public storm sewer system. In either event, the applicant shall model the conveyance choice to assure adequate capacity and provide a safe and stable emergency overflow. 2. The applicant must provide clarification to resolve the disparate impervious surface calculations and assure adequate volume reduction. 3. The applicant shall provide infiltration/water quality volume adequate to address the volume reduction requirements for the runoff from all impervious surfaces in the development. 4. The applicant must provide a detail of the rain gardens which is consistent with the recommendations and requirements of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual before final plat approval. 5. The applicant shall provide a detailed planting schedule for the rain garden areas. 6. The applicant shall provide a hydrograph showing the duration of ponding is less than 48 hours and shall reduce the ponding depth so the bounce does not exceed MN Storm Water Manual guidance or correct the soils and demonstrate that they are commensurate with HSG A or B soils. 7. The side slopes into the rain gardens shall not exceed three horizontal feet for every one vertical foot. 8. Discharge velocities into the rain gardens shall not exceed four cubic feet per second or the applicant shall provide scour calculations and adequate energy dissipation to assure erosion will not be an issue. 9. Pre-treatment shall be provided to minimize sediment deposition into the rain gardens. 10. Drain tile services must be provided to all properties that will flow from the back to the front of the lot. Planning Commission Fretham 19th Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 September 16, 2014 Page 17 of 17 11. Erosion Control plan /SWPPP must include all elements required under Chapter 19 of City Code. 12. Engineer estimate of quantities for erosion control and sediment prevention, including those necessary for final site stabilization, shall be provided and used to calculate escrow amount. 13. A Storm Water Management Utility fee estimated to be $9,168.00 shall be paid with final plat. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Lakewest Development Co., LLC variance narrative. 4. Reduced Copy Fretham 19th Addition Cover Sheet. 5. Reduced Copy Fretham 19th Addition Existing Conditions. 6. Reduced Copy Fretham 19th Addition Preliminary Plat. 7. Reduced Copy Fretham 19th Addition Preliminary Grading Plan. 8. Reduced Copy Fretham 19th Addition Preliminary Stone Water Pollution Prevention Plan. 9. Reduced Copy Fretham 19th Addition Preliminary Landscape Plan. 10. Registered Land Survey No. 105C. 11. Registered Land Survey No. 28. 12. Memo from Gerald & Karon Story to Kate Aanenson and Bob Generous dated 9/3/14. 13. Sketch of More Desireable (sic) Position for House (on Lot 1) per Story. 14. Petition Dated August 30, 2014 Re: Case # 2014-09, Fretham 19Ih Addition. 15. Sheet 1 A of 2, MS, Section 1300.0180 Unsafe Buildings and Structures. 16. Sheet 2A.of 2 Dated September 3, 2014 re Owner of Hazardous Building... 17. Letter from Chuck Mayers, CenterPoint Energy, to Bob Generous Dated 9/2/14. 18. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List. gAplan\2014 planning cases\2014-08 fretham 191h additionlstaff report fretham 19th.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION II ' Application of Lakewest Development, LLC and Naomi Carlson for Subdivision approval with variances. On September 2, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Lakewest Development, LLC and Naomi Carlson for preliminary plat approval of property to create four lots with variances for hard cover (32.4 % on Lot 1 and 28.2% on Lot 2) and a 20-foot front yard setback from Bretton Way for Lot 1. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential District, RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is shown on the attached Exhibit A. 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance subject to the granting of the variances requested in conjunction with the subdivision; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan since it provides a single-family home at density within those established by the comprehensive plan; c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter subject to compliance with the conditions of approval; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage provided additional storm water management is provided as recommended by staff, f The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record subject to the vacation of some of the existing private easements; and g. The proposed subdivision is not premature is available or being provided as part of the subdivision. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. 5. Variance Findings— Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The subject site is zoned Single -Family Residential District. The hard cover variances are to permit homes compatible with the surrounding properties. The purpose of the setback variance request is to permit a 20-foot front yard setback to create greater separation between the building and the existing access driveway to the property to the northeast. The 10-foot encroachment into the required front yard provides adequate separation between the structure and the street and maintains the adequate separation from the driveway for snow storage. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The practical difficulty of complying with the hard cover is the existing driveway which accounts for 67.2 and 37.7 percent of the allowable coverage on the respective lots. The practical difficulty of complying with the front yard setback is due to the lot configuration of the property and the existing driveway accessing the property to the northeast. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The stated intent of the request is for a typical single-family home on the lots. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The difficulty of complying with the hard cover and front yard setback is due to the lot configuration of the property and the existing easement and driveway. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the character of the area and permit homes typical to those in the neighborhood. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 6. The planning report #2014-08 dated September 16, 2014, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat with variances. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 16`s day of September, 2014. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION mm Its Chairman EXHIBIT A Legal Description Parcel 1: Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 105, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver Count, Minnesota. Torrens Property Torrens Certificate No. 18584.0 Parcel 2: Outlots C and D, Curry Farms 2nd Addition, according to the plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. Toren Property Torrens Certificate No. 19182.0 Parcel 3: That Part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 28, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said tract, thence due South along East line of said Tract 197.74 feet; thence South 88 degrees 4 minutes West 376.7 feet; thence South 1 degree 56 minutes East, 65.33 feet to actual point of beginning of tract to be described; thence North 1 degree 56 minutes West 51.33 feet; thence South 88 degrees 4 minutes West, 101.74 feet; thence North 77 degrees 44 minutes West, 60.97 feet; thence North 67 degrees 44 minutes West, 66.07 feet; thence North 85 degrees 14 minutes West, 35.67 feet to the West line of said tract; thence southerly along said West line 24.71 feet to an intersection with a line bearing North 48 degrees 15 minutes West from a point bearing North 89 degrees 19 minutes West, 190.50 feet from actual point of beginning; thence South 15 minutes East, 92.88 feet to said point bearing North 89 degrees 19 minutes East, 190.5 feet to actual point of beginning. Torrens Property Torrens Certificate No. 27468.0 Parcel 4: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 105, file of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW I Date Filed: I� 60-Day Review Deadline: 10 — \`-E — \4 Planner:/,7 & Case #:Ao 1 `i —OS ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Rezoning ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD................. $100 ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 ❑ Site Plan Review ❑ Administrative.................................................. $100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts*......................$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area Include number of existing employees: and number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit AD�IONAL REQUIRED FEES: LW Notification Sign .................................................. $200 (City to install and remove) Q Property Owners' List within 500......... $3 per address (City to generate — fee determined at pre -application meeting) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents.. $50 per document (CUP/SPRNACNARNVAP/Metes & Bounds Subdivision) Subdivision ❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 9 Create over 3 lots ............... ........ $600 + $15 per lot ❑ Metes & Bounds .........................$300 + $50 per lot ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ )of Line Adjustment ......................................... $150 W Final Plat`........................................................$250 'Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way................... $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance....... ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Single -Family Residence ❑ All Others ........................ ❑ Zoning Appeal ......................... $200 ............................ $150 ............................ $275 ............. I ....... I...... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ............................ $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) TOTAL FEES: $ 112,01 " ao Received from: ski N&64- -Dcve 1,UP W h+ L -LC. Date Received: 1 I Check Number: 4050l, I Section 2: Required Information Project Name: Property Address or Location: Parcel #: Legal Description: n Total Acreage: Wetlands Present? Present Zoning: 14r Present Land Use Designation: 0 Check box if separate narrative is attached W ® Yes Requested Zoning: Fa 4" % "'3 -5F Requested Land Use Designation: Krs—twW r Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Addres City/State/Zip:_ Email: be^g Signature: Contact: 13ej WIpfJp^ Phone: qZt el Cell: GI v Bo). 711Y Fax: If Z— F0 NTT Date: 00•-i" PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the informatjpq and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: /1/aom i ( iy �'- /Jan Address: City/State/Zip: L:A� Ad'r r& J . M ,2, .5 S 3./7 Contact: Phone: 95-1- S` 7 i�-/37L Cell: q4->9.? L Email: A"I"r C& i^ i7. cai;, Fax: Signa ur . Date: 9 /V 41 o This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: C4A&P4DA/ l!5V f tueWr,,1 J Aj�e✓e rcC5 Contact: rry C*mej o^f Address: /900 PlvArz'17r— C&ye- C-CAIUL— Phone: 763471.517E City/State/Zip: 1°1*A-c &&t4- 1%w 3-344 Cell: Email: IYL4 iin Ap A-^ Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: roperty Owner Via: [3 Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: Applicant Via: 2mail ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: a Engineer Via: YEmail ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: CANNED LAKEW1=ST DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC Lakewest Development is requesting two variances with the Fretham 1911, Addition Preliminary Plat application: one is to allow an impervious surface percentage over 25% on two of the proposed lots; the other is a front yard setback variance of 10' (to allow a 20-foot setback) on the Bretton Way side of the corner Lot 1. We believe that the criteria for variances are met with this application. a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Single-family uses are a permitted use in this zoning district and are the intended use for this property, according to the City's Comprehensive Plan. We are not asking for a lot size variance, as the square footage requirement for this district is met with the proposed subdivision. We believe that single-family homes of a certain appearance in this area are what was intended when this property was zoned and guided and when the outiots that make up this property were created, and that our proposed development will be a welcomed change to the neighborhood. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The practical difficulties for this property are the shape of the lot and the presence of an easement serving adjacent lots. When Curry Farms 2nd Addition was platted in the early 1990's, they showed how this property could be developed with four single-family homes (and four utility services were eventually installed along Bretton Way to serve this property). Because of an easement from 1969 - the use of which is not described in the easement document, although it has been and is being used for both access and a sewer line - that is still in effect, the buildable area of the westernmost lot is reduced by between 4' and 13' for the purposes of new drainage and utility easements and maintaining a certain required width of the access drive when it serves more than one property on the west end. We explored the possibility of either purchasing the property to the north to develop it in concert with this property, or to move the access to the its north side and off of this property, but could not reach an agreement. It is likely that when the property to the north is sold and/or developed, access for both adjacent properties to the north will come from a new public street across from Ashton Court, which would meet the guiding principals and policies of the comprehensive plan and has been discussed as a preferred option with staff. At that point, the sewer service extending the length of the easement could either be relocated to the new access, or it would be within the subject property's utility easement. However, since neither of these changes are a certainty, we are left with a narrow buildable area due to those existing conditions and topographic challenges, and are asking for a variance to allow the new structure to be placed closer to the Bretton Way right-of-way than is required by ordinance. Concerning the impervious surface variance request, the practical difficulty is derived from the same easement. As can be seen on the table of calculations on the preliminary plat sheet, the paved easement area (shown in the .existing driveway" column) takes up fully 2/3 (67.2%) of the allowable impervious on Lot 1, and 37.7% of the allowable impervious on Lot 3. All of this impervious is present for an easement that benefits our property in no way. Please keep in mind that the amount of impervious existing on site (all buildings and drives included) is greater than what we are proposing; that the situation may be remedied in the future, as described above; and served by the easement is far below impervious limits, and will almost certainly remain so even if those properties are developed with 15,000 square foot lots, because of lot depth and width requirements, topography near and setbacks from Powers Boulevard, and other challenges that would preclude placement of too much impervious on future subdivided lots. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. The variance requests are not for economic reasons; we are developers that are selling lots to builders. Because Chanhassen is a desirable location, and because we meet the square footage requirements that allow four lots, we would be able to find a builder with a home design that is more vertical that what we show as the potential homes' footprints. However, we don't believe such designs would fit with the neighborhood character, so we are asking for these variances to allow a more typical design. Similarly, we don't think homes with tuck -under garages - though that design appears to be rebounding to en vogue in some areas - would fit with what exists in the neighborhood. In short, four lots and four homes are possible and will happen with or without variances, but in order to have a newer product similar to the existing Curry Farms homes, we are asking for these concessions. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Please see the above answers pertaining to the 1969 easement. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. N/A PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR: FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MN MQFCT x ani"Erxsinl°LAN4CNPOExi Ie5i5 0] SVII[ JJS PH xxEiaxn. ux ssws JGJaaa dnlL GLW IflSESOYV CNWKN LNWIEEMING YR'n65. ANC M 110 PL.1. LR EEN Cd2P Y/Ll[PLAIN.YN55Xe W0.A71pl dAL.' I4 Vd A% kD WRAYOIG MAO �L B ME STREAT E PH ]11 eJ-}Je-U7a WN S duL Gu CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED AUG 15 2014 CHANR499N PLANNING DEP'I PROJECT LOCATION NL SPE LRICn110N5'. YINNESOTA CEPA"WENi? YO.. l.'SiN1oMO 2lICn11pS f CCMMUCTgr' LRIESi I... E AIPPIENENIS. O EEM Al.IAYW W NWXE.IA (CM) STMOMO U]YJ ]YY'AOOA' IlA1E5i Eg11M) MMICnK[ iOERAL 5]nR AW LOCAL LAK MIO OOONMCE MLL :WAY A MM W M CdSMCYM W MS PROECT. NN N CAMPION r ENGINEERING Rom. w ;�»% ;.— LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT COVER SHEET 79-oso SERVICES. INC. CHANHASSEN, MN SHEET N0, 1 OF 8 SHE�•01/03I201d II SCANNED CITY AUG 15 2014 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DER u .4._ .5 TOTAL AREA ' ACRES 5 d.. 65,)O16Y EXISTING HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS _. WAn4 iW ''�• .olr detw-IS.u..l SlamA ••_•�kh 6 '•xy IF - PROPOSED HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS vn s _ :n.w MM �r' ,. u,..ww soq pAt yS•.. TREE INVENTORY . �. ao 'r a ..uwwe•..•w.-•m LEGEND �RoaREv oeccumoN , .ro aa.xro as .._. u.... •�. -- .w.... w.... Km.yow mmiaPzn ......ww—..... ..�r....�_-.. •.�. M.�� oaelW v..ra IN IN CAMPION •••- FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION EXISTING CONDITIONS A ENGINEERING u�Sw �•w LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT aREMOvnL aLnN 3-oso 'tl\ SERVICES, INC. CESTDCCFN MN • I'I .: 2 6 {tl 01ID3Y1D1C AUG 15 2014 CHANHA4SENRANN INGDEPT I LEGEND raorrRrr nrecwrDDn , LOT DATA ♦� ter, LLfrt14W0 rre� rs �ti • a.�r � Mt e� raw r LO WA Y ` "/ cAMPION ""'�""'"� m ^-^�^^-� '""a FRETHAM 19THADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT 13-050 p ENGINEERING w LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. °iy=`�^`y"'` CHANHASSEN, MN .W ET NI i. 3 Of 6 SHEETS 1I0312014 CITY OFCHANHASSEN RECEIVED AUG 15 2014 CHAWASSEN PLANNING DEP7 ,.X..e� ..tee XIXJX Xu ..waa JM ronaury nwJs a r.s rnottJ M mrnMru.0 c roe M .°.erm wand an.Xe oXX M wM aXYpero _ ra.romo v rase ror-ioXL- - w-"e .-.Xe -. e. eXv - I memxmr mar° A X sow® z - auee - IF t X a. ,° w X M d �}� A F�• 4' J w i uaio riw ri sw�`an .'n °wJ `r.°a`°e roan`�v oIXVwr"°`mo . y9 •n' M 41 n wnwcnrWUT MbO 0n • anJ errs IF W44d 0 n � w � vwr X vrmu m rw rnr ra nvJrw (•I rul M NNrt M R o0o wJreµiw u�MG6 X M fou oodr. N M rGM nLWW s4SK °NI6 n "X 1"d a�uµoq vrr CWi YX u a�Xnr rt. W! INWP M' Y (1R 10.mn1 cuiw vn[• -I IX GUN W-lv rreewwuu ! m N """'"•' FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION CANPION ^-•=r•--� •J ^ • PRELIMINARY GMDINO PLAN 13-050 ENGINEERING � „„""� :�'•, �; � LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT SHEET NO. 4 OF 6 SHEETS M=014 m SeRVICES, INC. ••ywTM`•"w' CHANHASSEN MN —n M� mmuu 1•o-o-»I avu a /na rta lu m� „ wmrxm u. al rtv, vw me�m•� c� W-5 pptt iwur e A wiO ul a CITY OFCHANHASSEN RECEIVED L - .•� ` "rt5S , AUG 1 5 7(04 CHANHASSENPLANNING DEP7 N � �yp� •r , _r R.exm Rrcx •ice I «-» N«a .�.....� eILT FENCE pEt.Vl MAL. CITCN W&N MET ERo N CWRM ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N CAMPION --•--�•�=• FRETHAM I9TH ADDITION PRELIMINARY STORM WATER' ENGINEERING mN.� a.. u�u. •`+ POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN 13-050 SERVICES. INC. ^"-^ M��"""""•""`""" LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT ,•,, :�,,.""r.....F�.. _ CHANHASSEN MNI.I !P' S'�'I 6 !I•O1IOSrzOt6 P oM Schedule Plant Schedule KEY OM COMMON BOTANICAL NAME 5II TYPE CONMEN G A 3 1/3 ERST BRANCHING AT R5 ♦ '{RAMS.' Be STRAR T CENTRAL LEADER GO 3 HNA A' A M 3 1/3IBe NCNHIG Ai 6': MM NO 3RED OAK V U A 3 1/2BeNCHING AT 6': N R SO 3 3 I/3NCHING AL 8''. STRAIGHTCENTRAL LEADER HB 3 A T: OCPDENTALIS 3 1/3BeADES NCH NG AT 6'', 00.FNU." AUS IAN N BINDS HI A NLL FORM AR S B•_0•BeER; RWN A HILLS CE; %CEA AU A NLL IIXIMNSATA BH .i B'-0'ER: ND Planting Details LAKEWESTDEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN c,in FCHA HA SEN RECEIED AUG 15 7014 CNAwA98EN PLANNING DEPT t. N Ann M PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 13-050 -.I I I '1, 6 6 '.111 I' "BVOW2ota REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. Z OS C Carver Coumy, Minnesota JLL 0 Danofee Judieiol Landmark O DeRoIN 1/2-Inch 2 le -Inch 9e1 bon 60 0 60 120 reber morhed by Llcelme No. 12043 6W!F _ Scefe m fell .om00 Tied 6. RLS N0. SS SE ro1.1 M T-11 6 RLS N0. M MORTN 'Y b 30.Ih— SILT. /9]. TO _ r _ i, NOrI.��/� 329.%— Y -- EGO NN TnOr 6, R.L.9. Nu W 11� II :y I I I Ie 8 112. 61 al o j n I 116 i 6 2 I n •gn a Man M.O..`` _J _ Wi I € I: xOl°96'W'M 1".Y8 w.e a 69.00 H_ _ I Lw IY w A� I6.w $ g$ I � ;�•I b �I 1.' 3 E RMNrpr.I TYtl4 RL3 39..z eae,_ yN.� wo - Y53YYs Co 8 19 • w�ei — N6.%YN.. L_yplR.i � YyM /..99 ShNt 30/ 3 sheer, 274B r REGISTERED LAND SURVEY N0.26 CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Denotes Judicial Landmark. AUGUST, 1964 " o " Denotes Iron Monument• ELAN, FIELD A NOwAK Bearings Shown Are Assumed, SCALE: 1" . 200' SURVEYORS +C F(J I nerehy certify that In accordance with the provisions '0 \ of Chapter 508, Minnesota Sralu les of 1949, as emended, �'P \ 1 have surveyed the following described tract of land in the County of Carver and State of Minnesota, rOwl l: Tracts A and 8, Reg9istered Land Survey No. 11, Fl lea of the Registrar of Mies, Carver County, Minnesota. \ \\ Tnat the survey shown hereon is a correct delineation of se id survey. I;am\', Dated this rwday of A✓a.✓aT A. 0, 1964 \�Ef/�D A I Surveyor-A.Inneaota Reg suet on 110.612, (1 I o I This Registered Land Survey was approved V YChanha and accepted by Ey =Ithe Town Board of the TcwnsniA of Chanhassen at a regular me efing thereof held thhii�s.�l/1, -?day of_4 pf, ?�A,O, 19r, 411 NR V!'! tyl I I-'M2+r6 A WIt I nIB1it aN Town B �d C erk of Town Board This Registered Land Survey was approved and executed by the Board of Commissioners of the County of Carver, State Of Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held tni s+i_� day of V J i41 \;��•crvacR A.O. 1964. F •Ay ,yL .0 N -^ " JIn county Auditor — � +RoA D Z r 1• 61 W 7 12619 r c a z_ .7� Q x . p w 1i W u1 :# io9o7 in W A S9yR-5"VS- INeruw. Ys .4 ay cy L 1 •i hII, y -- Date: September 3, 2014 City Hall Meeting 11:00 To: Kate Aanenson- Director planning & Bob Generous- Senior planning Problems to be addressed case#2014-08 Fretham 19th Addition re: 6281 Teton road easement. 1. The position of the house on the corner of Teton lane & Bretton Way should be redesigned to have a continuous setback of no less than 10 feet from the 14ft road easement or house should be moved over with driveway coming off of Bretton Way, see alternative plan.( attached) 2. The 14ft road easement driveway should not be compromised or moved or excavated in any way unless the house at 6281 is given an alternate access into the property from Powers Blvd. because the property is landlocked from a main road. There was a road access out to Powers at one time when Centex was building houses in the 80's and it could be utilized again to use the road access out to the east side of the property to Powers Blvd. 3. Regarding the 10ft high retaining wall to be built alongside the road easement, property owners request the wall be placed at least 10 ft south of the road easement for stability of the utility easements which are already in place and include water, sewer, gas lines ,clean -outs & shut off that run underneath & down the entire length of the road easement and which the City of Chanhassen granted permits to have them installed. This set back is also needed for snow storage & water drainage as well. 4. Regarding the 10 ft. retaining wall with a drop off down to the proposed 4 new lots, Owners request a 6 ft. privacy fence on top of the retaining walls for the safety of children, cars, pets and wildlife. The privacy fence should extend all the way down to the Teton Lane entrance. 5. As dominant owners of the road easement (6281 Teton lane) we request a guarantee that an alternative access be created for us if there is any future harassment from dividing the easement into separate parcels instead of one. Many neighbors have complained about the gravel driveways in place now as they wash out onto Teton lane & Bretton Way every year. All driveways & the road easement should have black top not crushed rock which just washes away or gets pushed away by the snow being plowed. All blacktop to be installed & paid for by developer. In Conclusion: The residents of Bretton Way & Teton Lane respectfully request the following petition be put into the public record. All the surrounding tax payer home owners who have had to deal with this hazardous building should be given the same consideration as the non -conforming buildings owner. As the petition states before any building permits are issued or any new home construction begins. The existing hazardous foundry building & house are to be demolished and the excavating & preparation of the entire parcel of land including the proposed retaining wall be completed to prevent potential mudslides and damage to neighboring properties. /�%URA DEs��E�g�E locr-Holy Fog lyausE --- , ,-lip RpRIl ErEIVED AG 1 5 209a I CHANHA�SEN PLANNING DFPI' I I I I L.J. nwr"'7 /� I—•'f,/�{ `�y' 17 LC('.BND I '• �' V r .Wep w•a�. I I '' ��.^ I �� .NqG w.w.>u,� I I • •. I Lar DATA ,mqw q.w-,..we.l...ggw..T........_..M.r..rr.+ � 1 "' •""�'_-_ I MMO la IW" lol qG - iClm Y I wqq WlgM�"(-qnn Y w4uww .--_ WYM b1tY1'M PIVW Mb Vq/Ir GYWvll ."[BgOl O.16 ur./wl.a�®W �.qww\.nr WY...W r q "� we wna.o N .a,M.M•ulr. .�rM b... CAN%CN'�,,,, FRETHAM I9THA ADDITION ENGNON ING '^��w ' �' PRELIMINARY PLAT 73-050 'wLC':Y.'4C :..Otl".. LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. INC. prop °Sec I ' AOG 15 2014 = -I C'HA HM4SENPlAWIIININGDEPA I I I ^� � E— „� cp i III gyp• ° + I .7 ,'�� w�,iim-� _ ��:� /i .% I -II it Seim // / I •� I 1 �• .—�,C —\_`+— / ^___. 1� it � /�'�'�/ I i �9 I w ---•--_ mwlu nxm I — ��-sn. I LOT BAT �:a o�av'm�xne W..n I I I I �� ws IvnRa•. M� • mAx W M iul. ___ _ m CAMRION = "`a��'d."�' ;,�-r `^^'�^ FRETHAM 19TH DITION ° /1 `.. PRELIMINARY PLAT 3 050 ENGINEERING .W,.mm, �,:Y�.�.+�.."., W(EWEST DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. INC. GIJCR nl(1 i !lF R CIII""T: �'�inMVJn1d Date: August 30, 2014 Attn: Chanhassen Planning Commission & Chanhassen City Council Re: Case# 2014-08 Fretham 19«' Addition plat review for 6397 &6411 Bretton Way We the residents of Curry Farms, and neighbors of 6411 Bretton Way and 6397 Bretton Way, respectfully request that before any approval of the request to divide these properties is approved, that there be stipulations and guarantees put in place by the Chanhassen City Council to ensure the following: Before any building permits are issued or any new home construction begins: 1) The existing buildings located at 6411 Bretton Way and 6397 Bretton Way are demolished in a safe and ecologically responsible manner, including proper abatement and disposal of any potentially environmentally hazardous elements or chemicals, including but not limited to, asbestos, vermiculite, and lead. 2) Excavating and preparation of the entire parcel of land is completed, including installation of proposed retaining walls to ensure that the land, and especially the hill is sound for building and to prevent potential mudslides and damage to neighboring properties. u Paqe, Date: August 30, 2014 J Attn: Chanhassen Planning Commission & Chanhassen City Council Re: Case# 2014-08 Fretham 19th Addition plat review for 6397 &6411 Bretton Way We the residents of Curry Farms, and neighbors of 6411 Bretton Way and 6397 Bretton Way, respectfully request that before any approval of the request to divide these properties is approved, that there be stipulations and guarantees put in place by the Chanhassen City Council to ensure the following: Before any building permits are issued or any new home construction begins: 1) The existing buildings located at 6411 Bretton Way and 6397 Bretton Way are demolished in a safe and ecologically responsible manner, including proper abatement and disposal of any potentially environmentally hazardous elements or chemicals, including but not limited to, asbestos, vermiculite, and lead. 2) Excavating and preparation of the entire parcel of land is completed, including installation of proposed retaining walls to ensure that the land, and especially the hill is sound for building and to prevent potential mudslides and damage to neighboring properties. Address 1 A df a REVISOR 1300.0180 1300.0180 UNSAFE BUQ,DINGS OR STRUCTURES. A building or structure regulated by the code is unsafe, for purposes of this part, if it is structurally unsafe, not provided with adequate egress, a fire hazard, or otherwise dangerous to human life. Building service equipment that is regulated by the code is unsafe, for purposes of this part, if it is a fire, electrical, or health hazard; an unsanitary condition; or otherwise dangerous to human life. Use of a building, structure, or building service equipment constituting a hazard to safety, health, or public welfare by reason of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, obsolescence, fire hazard, disaster, damage, or abandonment is, for the purposes of this part, an unsafe use. Parapet walls, cornices, spires, towers, tanks, statuary, and other appendages or structural members that are supported by, attached to, or a part of a building and that are in deteriorated condition or otherwise unable to sustain the design loads that are specified in the code are unsafe building appendages. The building official may order any building or portion of a building to be vacated if continued use is dangerous to life, health, or safety of the occupants. The order shall be in writing and state the reasons for the action. All unsafe buildings, structures, or appendages are public nuisances and must be abated by repair, rehabilitation, demolition, or removal according to Minnesota Statutes, sections 463.15 to 463.26. Statutory Authority: MS 16B.59; 16B.61; 16B.64; 326B.101; 326B.106, 326B.13 History: 27 SR 1471; L 2007 c 140 art 4 s 61; art 13 s 4 Published Electronically: February 19, 2009 September 3, 2014 Re: Owner of hazardous building (Naomi Carlson) located at 6411 Bretton Way has been occupying the foundry building as her residence since April, 2014. This is against several State & City codes as per state code 1300.0180( attached) unsafe buildings. This building is an illegal residence. 1. No electrical in the foundry building brought up to code, no smoke detectors or required arc- faults breakers as required by code. 2. No cooking facility 3. No bathing only a stool & sink 4. No proper venting 5. No egress windows 6. No fire doors or fire inspections 7. No inspections or permits obtained 8. Finally no Certificate of Occupancy CenterPoint. C Energy September 2, 2014 Bob Generous Senior Planner 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 700 West Linden Avenue PO BOX 1155 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1165 RE: Proposed Plat review for a four lot subdivision at 3697 and 6411 Bretton Way Dear Mr. Generous: With reference to the Plat review for a four lot subdivision at 3697 and 6411 Bretton Way, CenterPoint Energy does have an existing natural gas main and service lines in that portion of the proposed plat. Since this gas main is an important part of the distribution system for this development we must object to this proposed plat unless suitable easement rights are reserved to CenterPoint Energy pursuant to MnSta 160.29 & MnRule 7819.3200. Please reserve an easement to CenterPoint Energy, created by and within the addresses of 3697 and 6411 Bretton Way within the proposed four lot subdivision and filed with the Hennepin County Recorder's office. We may consider removing our objection should the petitioner wish to reimburse CenterPoint Energy the cost of relocating the existing gas main. To discuss this and other options that may be available, please have the petitioner contact Andrew Balgobin, Administrative Engineer at 612-321-5426. Thank you for the advance notice and please send me a copy of the final action on this proposed Plat. Respectfully, CENTERPOINT ENERGY 'kzylV� d' Chuck Mayers Right of -Way Speeislist pc: Andrew Balgobin, Administrative Engineer Todd Norgren, Area Manager Susan Sargent, Supervisor Field Operations Gary Allison, Master Tech ADV Foreperson Chem Monson, Sale Associate Travis Denzel, Engineering �. Ay1� 1 ,�r y r Y 1 0 �zI A. iP' � i � I �� ► CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on September 4, 2014, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Fretham Addition — Planning Case 2014-08 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this � day ofScplerv►l , 2014. Re. MjkVRtW Depuolerk #KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Puotic•Minnawtay COMMI" m Frpin Jon 37,2 5nvw Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later In the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Preliminary Plat Review for a four -lot subdivision with variances for hard cover and setback on 1.51 acres of Proposal: property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION Applicant: Lakewest Development, LLC Owner: Naomi Carlson Property 6397 and 6411 Bretton Way Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens W 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-08. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at beenerous(o)ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feel of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any Interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendaton. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/Ihoustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may lake several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding He status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersomrepresenlative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included In the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Plannino Staff person named on the notification. Date & Time: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Preliminary Plat Review for a four -lot subdivision with variances for hard cover and setback on 1.51 acres of Proposal: property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION Applicant: Lakewest Development, LLC Owner: Naomi Carlson Property 6397 and 6411 Bretton Way Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens W 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-08. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by email at boenerous(a)ci chanhassen mn.us or by phone at Questions 8 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party Is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings. land use and code amendments take a simple majority vole of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commeroialMdusmal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersomrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included In the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be inciudetl in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. ALEJANDRO FERRER-MACHUCA BRENT W & DIANE E FESTER BRETT K STIER 6330 TETON LN 6350 TETON LN 2211 HILLSBOROUGH RD APT 4108 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 DURHAM, NC 27705-4164 CATHERINE J GUY CHRISTIAN S & MAUREEN CHRISTOPHER WALTER MAY 405 COUNTY RD 4 SE CONNERY 6400 TETON LN ATWATER, MN 56209-8301 6440 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 CHUE HER DANIEL J & PAMELA J FELLER DANIEL J & SANDRA A COUCH 6250 POWERS BLVD 6430 BRETTON WAY 1321 ASHTON CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9434 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7529 O'CONELIZABETH RENEE HILLS FRANCO C LORIS GARY A & KAREN J DOHSE 6431 BRETNORTON PO BOX 263 6251 TETON LN 6431 CHANHASSEN, EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-0263 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9054 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 GARY P & LEORA F MATTILA GERALD E STORY GREGORY S & PATRICIA J BAZANY 1321 ITHILIEN 6281 TETON LN 6420 BRETTON WAY EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9032 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8331 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 JAMES A SHANESY JAMES J JOHNSON JIMMY D SHADLER 6340 TETON LN 6421 BRETTON WAY 6450 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 JOHN J SAVARINATHAN JOHN W JR & SUSAN E KUNITZ KENNETH F & PATRICIA J GARVIN 6360 TETON LN 6441 BRETTON WAY 6390 TETON LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 LAWRENCE E & KATHLEEN MKERLEONARD E & ANN B WARE MARCUS R & JENNIFER A ZBINDEN 6420 PO 1225 LILAC LN 6460 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MNN 55317-9434 420 POWERS B EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9053 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7507 MOHAMED IBRAHIM MONICA A WIANT NAOMI RUTH CARLSON 6260 POWERS BLVD 1385 ITHILIEN 5955 CATHCART DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9434 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9032 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8916 PETER B & LEAH J THORSON ROBERT L RABE SAMULE D TEUT 6370 TETON LN 6307 TETON LN 1311 ITHILIEN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7527 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7528 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9032 SHARON MICHELLE O'BRIEN THOMAS & MOLLY BERGFALK 6451 BRETTON WAY 6461 BRETTON WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7508 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-7508 PROPOSED MOTION: "The City Council approves Planning Case 2014-28 consisting of a preliminary plat to replat 63,372 square feet into one lot (36412s4 feet) and one outlot (34,469-s�et) Chanhassen Retail 4`s Addition as shown in plans dated received October 6, 2014, approval of a site plan dated August 13, 2014, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation.,, SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Site Plan Appro for the construction of a 4,412 square -foot single -story building and replat to create a 26,372 square -foot lot including an additional 7,887 square feet of adjacent property being acquired from Target. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within the required 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. LOCATION: 945 West 78'h Street APPLICANT: Halifax Development LLC 4201 East Yale Ave, Suite 200 Denver, CO 89222 (303)623-0502 PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) within the Central Business District 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Commercial ACREAGE: .79 acres DENSITY: N/A LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 2 of 16 PROPOSAU/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting preliminary plat and site plan approval to redevelop portions of properties owned by the City of Chanhassen and Target Corporation. The site is located north of Highway 5 and east of Powers Boulevard. Access to the parcel will be gained off of West 78`s Street via Target Lane. Sewer and water are available to the site. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS • Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review • Chapter 20, Article XVIH, Central Business District • Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and Office - Institutional Development • Chapter 18, Subdivision The City of Chanhassen through the HRA owns Outlot A, Chanhassen Retail Second Addition, which is approximately 1.47 acres. The property surrounds the three buildings west of Target including Taco Bell, Leeann Chin and Peri in's. This outlot is a remnant of the construction of the widening of West V' Street and Powers Boulevard. Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 3 of 16 SUBDIVISION The developer is requesting preliminary plat approval to replat a portion Outlot A, Chanhassen Retail Second Addition into a 26,372 square -foot lot and one outlot. A portion of the Target parking lot (7,877 square feet) will be added administratively to the city property to create the lot for the proposed building. Preliminary Plat of Chanhassen., f `i—�e:t Retail Fourth Addition ;r � �II++�� _:, V \ \ l� _ !i N Ri �+ I 0.1k, _ y J�y V AYE -'°r _ ♦ o. .': � A 'L 4-ty,,�._- � •a� w -set � C —ppp * �4b Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 4 of 16 The ordinance states, "All lots shall abut for their full required minimum frontage on a public street as required by the zoning ordinance; or be accessed by a private street; or a flag lot which shall have a minimum of thirty feet of frontage on a public street." The lot has street frontage. Access to the lot is gained off of a public street from Target Lane via West 78s' Street. The minimum lot area in this PUD is 20,000 square feet. Lot I will have an area of 34,249 square feet. Based on the preliminary plat, the following are the lot tabulations for the project: Parcel to be sold from the Ci 26,372 square feet Parcel to be sold from Target 7,877 square feet Total Site 34,249 square feet / .79 acres Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. PARKS AND TRAILS The condition of approval for platting Outlot A, Chanhassen Retail Second Addition is the payment of park and dedication fees at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. At today's rate the payment is $12,500 per acre for approximately $7,562.50. SUBDIVISION FINDINGS 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. Fin in: The subdivision meets the intent of the city code subject to the conditions of the staff report. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city s comprehensive plan; Fin in: The proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable plans. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report. 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision will be served by adequate urban infrastructure. Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 5 of 16 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. 7. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. c. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision is provided with adequate urban infrastructure. SITE PLAN The proposed building contains two uses, a fast -casual restaurant (Noodles & Company) and a future retail or restaurant use. outdoor seating is proposed along the south side of the building. Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 6 of 16 .-' tom\ •�1� �� 9 QVIEW FROMrrNORTHEAST .Doan All Q VIEW FROMrrNORTHWEST Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 7of16 The applicant has submitted a sign plan. It shows signs along the east, north and south elevations as well as proposing a monument sign at the entrance into the site. Conflicting sign details and locations have been submitted. One ground low -profile business sign is permitted. The height of the sign shall not exceed 8 feet and square footage shall not exceed 64 square feet. All signs shall meet ordinance requirements pertaining to height, area, illumination and dimensional letters. Wall signs will be limited to three elevations, north, south and east. All signage will require separate permits. The applicant has approached staff regarding adding the name of one of the neighboring users on the proposed monument sign. Since this site is a PUD, staff has no objection to this request. However, the monument sign on the other site must be removed. LIGHTING/SIGNAGE A photometrics plan must be prepared for the site. The numbers may not exceed one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. All fixtures including wall packs must be shielded. PARKING The ordinance requires one parking space per 200 square feet for multi -tenant buildings. Twenty-three parking spaces are required. The applicant is showing 43 spaces, meeting the parking requirements. Additionally, the applicant has a cross -access agreement with Target. Target also exceeds their parking requirement of 533 spaces. Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 8 of 16 ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE Size, Portion and Placement Entries: The building has pronounced entrances. Articulation: The building incorporates adequate detail and has been tastefully designed. The architectural style is unique to the building but will fit in with the surrounding area. The building will provide a variation in style through the use of brick, stucco, metal and glass. The building utilizes exterior materials that are durable and of high quality. Signs: All signage must meet the sign criteria in the Central Business District. The applicant may share a monument sign with another user in the same PUD contingent upon the removal of the existing monument sign. Material and Detail The building contains brick and stucco. High -quality materials are being used on the building. Color The colors chosen for the building are light tans and browns. The selection is unique, but blends in with the surrounding buildings. Height and Roof Desian The building ranges in height between 17 and 19 feet. The district has no height limits. The structure is a single level. The roofline is staggered, adding articulation to the design of the building. The rooftop equipment is screened from views by a parapet wall. Facade Transparency All facades viewed by the public contain more than 50 percent windows and/or doors. Loadine Areas, Refuse Areas. etc. Loading to the building will be thorough the front entry. The trash enclosure is located along the southern property line and southeast of the proposed building. The enclosure utilizes the same exterior material as the building. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. EASEMENTS The plan shows proposed grading, storm sewer and parking lot construction outside the property lines. The developer must work with the neighboring property owners, including the City, to Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 9 of 16 acquire a temporary construction easement for all off -site grading and construction. The developer must also acquire a permanent easement over all improvements the developer shall own and be responsible for maintaining, such as the storm sewer. The developer must obtain an access agreement from the City for construction and maintenance of the sanitary sewer and water main within the right of way of Target Lane. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The developer's engineer shall include the Perkin's parking lot islands in the topographic plan. Current plans do not show all islands within the survey area. Final plans shall include existing and proposed elevations at the property comers and structure comers. The grading plan shall include drainage arrows to indicate the direction of water flow. The developer shall submit an accurate soils report indicating soil conditions and permeability. The grading plan shall identify proposed stockpile areas. The grading plan shall show the top and bottom elevation of the retaining wall near the Target sign. STREETS & PARKING LOTS The developer hired Spack Consulting for a traffic study of this area and the signal timings at Target Lane/West 78'b Street and West 78`s Street/Powers Boulevard. The results of the study showed that the proposed development would not alter the Level of Service designations at the intersections, and the data did not indicate the need for traffic improvements. In order to construct the water and sanitary sewer connections, Target Lane will be excavated and rebuilt to City standard specifications. The proposed alignment is adjusted so that Target Lane runs directly into the Target parking lot, while providing entrance into the Shops at Chanhassen lot. The parking spaces shall be adjusted so that minimum dimensions are measured from the gutter flow line. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN A proposed 6-inch, C900 water main will connect the development to the existing water main under West 78th Street. Final plans will show the profiles and avoid conflict with storm sewer. Proposed 6-inch and 8-inch PVC sanitary sewer main will connect the development to the existing sanitary manhole at Target Lane. Final plans will show the profiles and avoid conflict with storm sewer. Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 10 of 16 The developer must pay the partial payment of the SAC fees and the WAC fees with the final plat. The remaining SAC and WAC fees shall be collected with the building permit, based on the rates in effect at the time of building permit application. The party applying for the building permit is responsible for payment of that remainder. Gradine and Drainage The site currently decreases in elevation from west to east with drainage working toward the right-of-way for Minnesota Department of Transportation and into pond LS-P3.31 located south of Target. Under the proposed conditions, surface water will be directed into a private storm sewer system before discharging into the same pond. The applicant shall provide Rational Method calculations for proposed pipe design. The applicant shall work with city staff to assure downstream system has adequate capacity to handle the additional volume directed from the new impervious surface. Stormwater Management The Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District and the City of Chanhassen have both identified this pond as a good candidate for increased capacity and improved water quality treatment. Rather than have the applicant provide storm water management features on the subject property, the District and the applicant have agreed to take cash in lieu of these facilities. Otto Associates has provided an engineer's opinion of cost to treat 1.1 inches of water quality volume from the new impervious surfaces associated with this development. This opinion of cost was $25,000 and shall be due at time of final plat to be put into an account to be used exclusively for the improvement of downstream water quality. Grading and Erosion Prevention and Control The total disturbance will not exceed the minimum one -acre threshold to require a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Construction Permit. The applicant has developed a preliminary erosion control plan. This plan must be consistent with Section 19-145 of Chanhassen City Code. One noted deficiency is that the swale west of the building must be stabilized within 48 hours prior to discharging. The developer must coordinate the proposed grading in the northeast comer of the site with the affected small utilities, as the plans show altering the grade in the vicinity of two small utility pads. Fees The anticipated fees collected with the final plat are: Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 11 of 16 • Surface Water Management fees • Park Dedication fee • GIS fees • Recording fees (if not collected with the final plat application) City water (WAC), City sewer (SAC) and Metropolitan Council sewer (Metro SAC) fees are collected with the building permit and are calculated based on the uses within the building. Any fees paid for WAC and SAC units currently associated with the site will be credited to the WAC and SAC fee calculation. LANDSCAPING Minimum requirements for landscaping at Shops at Chanhassen include 1,728 square feet of landscaped area around the parking lot, three landscape islands or peninsulas, and six trees for the parking lot. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 1,728 s . ft. >1,728 s . ft. Trees/parkingTrees/parking lot 6 trees 6 trees Islands or eninsulas/ arkin� 3 islands/Peninsulas 4 islands/peninsulas Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 12 of 16 The applicant meets minimum requirements for trees and interior landscaping in the parking lot area. The applicant is required to provide bufferyard plantings along property lines. Bufferyard requirements are as shown in the following table: Landscaping Item Required Proposed Bufferyard B — South 2 overstory trees 2 overstory trees property line, 185', 20' 4 understory trees 5 understory trees width 6 shrubs 9 shrubs Bufferyard A — West 1 overstory tree 3 overstory trees property line 2 understory tree 3 understory trees 3 shrubs 0 shrubs Bufferyard A — north 1 overstory tree 0 overstory trees property line 2 understory tree 5 understory trees 3 shrubs 0 shrubs The applicant meets bufferyard landscaping requirements. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide quantities in the submitted plant schedules for all plants proposed. COMPLIANCE TABLE Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Lot Area PUD 20,000 square feet 34,248 square feet Frontage 100, Over 100 feet Depth 100, Over 100 feet Lot Covera e Not applicable Building Height Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Principal No Maximum 19, Building Setbacks Ordinance Requirements Subject Site North Front yard No Minimum South Front yard No Minimum East Front yard No Minimum Parking Requirements Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Stalls Retail 1/200 multitenant 23 stalls Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 13 of 16 SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the City shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the City's design requirements, the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and the site plan review requirements. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. The site design is compatible with the surrounding developments. It is functional and harmonious with the approved development for this area. Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 14 of 16 Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. The overall design is sensitive to the City's image. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan with conditions outlined in the staff report. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following motions: Subdivision "The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the preliminary plat to replat 63,372 square feet into one lot (26,372 square feet) and one outlot (37,469 square feet) Chanhassen Retail 4`s Addition, Planning Case 2014-28 as shown in plans dated received August 13, 2014, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Enmg eering Before the final plat is recorded the Surface Water Management fees, Park Dedication fees, and GIS fees must be paid as well as any recording fees not collected with the final plat application. 2. The applicant shall submit $25,000 in lieu of constructing stormwater best management practices. This shall be due at time of final plat to be put into an account to be used exclusively for the improvement of water quality downstream of the site. 3. The Storm Water Utility fee is estimated to be $18,525.10 and shall be due at final plat. Park and Trail Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Shops at Chanhassen. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Site Plan "The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the site plan consisting of a 4,412 square -foot multi -tenant building, Planning Case 2014-28 as shown in plans dated received August 15, 2014, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 15 of 16 Environmental Resource 1. The applicant shall provide Rational Method calculations for proposed pipe design. The applicant shall work with City staff to assure downstream system has adequate capacity to handle the additional volume directed from the new impervious surface. 2. The erosion prevention and sediment control plan must be consistent with Section 19-145 of Chanhassen City Code. Build�cial 1. The building is required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4. Detailed occupancy -related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. 5. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Eneineering 1. The developer must work with the neighboring property owners, including the City, to acquire temporary construction easement for all off -site grading and construction. 2. The developer must acquire a permanent easement over all improvements the developer shall own and be responsible for maintaining, such as the storm sewer. 3. The developer must obtain an access agreement from the City for construction and maintenance of the sanitary sewer and water main within the right of way of Target Lane. 4. The developer's engineer shall include the Perkin's parking lot islands in the topographic plan. Current plans do not show all islands within the survey area. 5. Final plans shall include existing and proposed elevations at the property comers and structure comers. 6. The grading plan shall include drainage arrows to indicate the direction of water flow. 7. The developer shall submit an accurate soils report indicating soil conditions and permeability. Planning Commission Shops at Chanhassen— Planning Case 2014-28 September 16, 2014 Page 16 of 16 8. The grading plan shall identify proposed stockpile areas. 9. The grading plan shall show the top and bottom elevation of the retaining wall near the Target sign. 10. The parking spaces shall be adjusted so that minimum dimensions are measured from the gutter flow line. 11. The developer must pay the partial payment of the SAC fees and the WAC fees with the final plat. Plannine 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 2. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. Wall signs shall be limited to the north, east and south elevations. Wall and monument signage shall comply with the sign ordinance. All signs require a sign permit. 3. The applicant may share a monument sign within the same PUD contingent upon the removal of the existing monument sign. 4. The exterior material for the trash enclosure must be of the same exterior material as the building. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. 5. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. All fixtures must be shielded. 6. Provide and maintain a cross access agreement with Target for parking. 7. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon approval of the subdivision and the administrative lot line adjustment for Target as shown in Exhibit # 7 ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Application. 3. Preliminary Plat Chanhassen Retail 4`h Addition dated and Received October 6, 2014. 4. Reduced Copy Plans (sheets Cl through C10) dated Received August 21, 2014. 5. Reduced Copy Building Rendering (sheet SK-1) dated Received August 21, 2014. 6. Letter from MnDOT dated September 3, 2014. 7. Legal description of parcel to be sold from Target. 8. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing. g:\pplan\2014 planning cases\2014-28 shops at chanhassen\ctatr n;port.doc Chanhassen City Council: Re: Fretham 19th Addition Planning Case 2014-08 10/13/14. Re: A 14ft wide x 450ft forever road easement from Teton Lane to deeded landlocked house at 6281 Teton. According to Chanhassen City Code 18-39 (6) the proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Easement #14111 has been deeded as a forever easement of Tract B since 1969 and has been only used & maintained by the 6281 Teton Lane property. There is no stipulation in the planning report given to 6281 Teton for maintaining the integrity of their road easement which was created specifically for the only landlocked property in the whole parcel of land. According to state law the land locked property has dominate rights of the easement. If no consideration is given to protect our easement rights in the planning report and our rights are not preserved, an alternate access must be provided to landlocked property. The landlocked property should have preferential rights over all properties that are not landlocked. We respectfully submit that a motion be made that the easement is exclusive only to the land locked property. It is stated in our deed the above bargained and granted land and premises should be in the quiet and peaceable possession of said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, against all persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, subject to incumbrances, if any hereinbefore mentioned, the said party of the first part will Warrant and Defend. Chanhassen City Council: Re: Fretham 19th Addition Planning Case 2014-08 10/13/14. Re: A 14ft wide x 450ft forever road easement from Teton Lane to deeded landlocked house at 6281 Teton. According to Chanhassen City Code 18-39 (6) the proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Easement #14111 has been deeded as a forever easement of Tract B since 1969 and has been only used & maintained by the 6281 Teton Lane property. There is no stipulation in the planning report given to 6281 Teton for maintaining the integrity of their road easement which was created specifically for the only landlocked property in the whole parcel of land. According to state law the land locked property has dominate rights of the easement. If no consideration is given to protect our easement rights in the planning report and our rights are not preserved, an alternate access must be provided to landlocked property. The landlocked property should have preferential rights over all properties that are not landlocked. We respectfully submit that a motion be made that the easement is exclusive only to the land locked property. It is stated in our deed the above bargained and granted land and premises should be in the quiet and peaceable possession of said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, against all persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, subject to incumbrances, if any hereinbefore mentioned, the said party of the first part will Warrant and Defend. Fretham 19th Stormwater Management Design Summary Campion Engineering Sr3W2014 WATERQUAUTY Standard: Achieve 90% TSS removal and 75 % TP removal on an annual basis (met d infiltration requirement rite!) VOLUME CONTROL Standard'. Abstraction of 1.1 inches of runoff from all impervious surfaces Rain Garden 1 Rain Garden 2 Soil Type C C Infiltration Rate (i /hr) 0.2 0.2 DA (acres) 0.75 OAS Proposed Impervious (acres) 0.28 Required Infiltration volume(cq 1,122 Volume to be Infiltrated (cf) 586 1 719 Total Infiltration volume (of) 1,305 Infiltration of 1.1 inch rainfall event achieves the vreter quality standard. CRY KHANNED SEN Based on Web Soil Survey MN Slormwater Manual AUG 1 5 701A OJANNASSEN PLANNING DEPT RATECONTROL Standard: Proposed runoff shall not exceed existing runoff rates for the 2., 10-, and 1OD-year, nested 24-hour storm events, and a 100 yr. 10-0ay snowmen even. DRAINAGE AREA Total (sf) Ind "IOUs (ap Gmw tsfl Pervlous (an ( N) (98) (96) —Cm - Existing 65.703 8.292 11.891 45.520 Proposed Sub-A(2S) 3,727 609 568 2,550 SuUB (3S) 16,755 3,707 2,247 10,801 SuDC(4S) 15,B05 3.197 954 11,654 Sub-0(5S) 19.662 3,945 1,847 13,870 Sub-E(6S) 9754 778 122 6,854 Total 65,703 12,236 5,738 47.729 SCANNED Sewer - Ex 3S + Sub-B ES Sub -A LSubcat, Reach on [Linki S 57\ Sub-C\ Sub- \\YI \ � 6S �AO \D " Sub - 9P Culvert - Lot 2 Rain Garden t Rain Garden 2 8P y, Sewer - Prop Fretham 19th Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCAD®10 00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 2.141 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C (1 S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S, 6S) 0.405 96 Gravel surface, HSG C (1 S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S, 6S) 0.471 98 Paved parking, HSG C (1 S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S, 6S) Fretham 19th Precip Fretham 19th 24-hr S1 2-yr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCAD010 00 s/n 02201 ©2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Runoff = 2.89 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.153 af, Depth= 1.21" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_l9th 24-hr S1 2-yr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 8,292 98 Paved parking, HSG C 11,891 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 45,520 74 >75% Grass cover, Good. HSG C 65,703 81 Weighted Average 57,411 87.38% Pervious Area 8,292 12.62% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.2 450 0.0690 1.21 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Sub -A Runoff = 0.21 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.009 at, Depth= 1.21" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_19th 24-hr S1 2-yr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Descriotion 609 98 Paved parking, HSG C 568 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 2,550 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 3,727 81 Weighted Average 3,118 83.66% Pervious Area 609 16.34% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.3 60 0.0670 0.80 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Sub-B Runoff = 0.92 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.041 at, Depth= 1.28" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_19th 24-hr St 2-yr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Fretham 19th Precip Fretham_ 19th 24-hr S1 2-yr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCAD810 00 s/n 02201 @ 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 4 Area (sf) CN Description 3,707 98 Paved parking, HSG C 2,247 96 Gravel surface, HSG C _ 10,801 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 16,755 82 Weighted Average 13,048 77.88% Pervious Area 3,707 22.12% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.1 212 0.0750 1.12 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Sub-C Runoff = 0.80 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.035 af, Depth= 1.15" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_l9th 24-hr S1 2-yr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 3,197 98 Paved parking, HSG C 954 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 11,654 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 15,805 80 Weighted Average 12,608 79.77% Pervious Area 3,197 20.23% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.4 228 0.1580 1.55 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Sub-D Runoff = 1.06 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.046 af, Depth= 1.21" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_l9th 24-hr S1 2-yr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN Description 3,945 98 Paved parking, HSG C 1,847 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 13,870 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 19,662 81 Weighted Average 15,717 79.94% Pervious Area 3,945 20.06% Impervious Area Fretham 19th Precip_Fretham_ 19th 24-hr S1 2-yr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCAD®10 00 s/n 02201 02012 Hydr2CAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fUff) (f /sec) (cfs) 2.3 189 0.1270 1.38 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 6S: Sub-E Runoff = 0.39 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.017 af, Depth= 0.93" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_19th 24-hr St 2-yr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Area (sf) CN 778 98 Paved parking, HSG C 122 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 8,854 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 9,754 76 Weighted Average 8,976 92.02% Pervious Area 778 7.98% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.7 134 0.1790 1.32 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Pond 7P: Sewer - Ex Inflow Area = 1.508 ac, 12.62% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.21" for 2-yr event Inflow = 2.89 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.153 of Primary = 2.89 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.153 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 8P: Sewer - Prop Inflow Area = 1.508 ac, 18.62% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.84" for 2-yr event Inflow = 0.85 cfs @ 12.31 hrs, Volume= 0.106 of Primary = 0.85 cfs @ 12.31 hrs, Volume= 0.106 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 9P: Culvert - Lot 2 Inflow Area = 0.385 ac, 22.12% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.28" for 2-yr event Inflow = 0.92 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.041 of Outflow = 0.86 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.041 af, Atten= 6%, Lag= 0.9 min Primary = 0.86 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.041 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 990.47' @ 12.03 hrs Surf.Area= 260 sf Storage= 103 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 8.9 min calculated for 0.041 of (100% of inflow) Fretham 19th Precip_Fretham 19th 24-hr S 1 2-yr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCAD®10 00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 6 Center -of -Mass det. time= 6.3 min ( 839.6 - 833.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 989.90' 691 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 989.90 0 0 0 990.00 146 7 7 991.00 386 266 273 992.00 450 418 691 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 990.00' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 80.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 990.00' / 982.00' S= 0.1000 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.86 cfs @ 12.03 hrs HW=990.47' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.86 cfs @ 2.34 fps) Summary for Pond 10P: Rain Garden 1 Inflow Area = 0.747 ac, 21.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.21" for 2-yr event Inflow = 1.62 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.076 of Outflow = 0.70 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.069 af, Atten= 57%, Lag= 7.6 min Discarded = 0.00 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.011 of Primary = 0.70 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.057 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 982.72' @ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 906 sf Storage= 958 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 224.5 min calculated for 0.069 of (91 % of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 177.4 min ( 1,016.7 - 839.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 981.49' 4,019 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 981.49 0 0 0 981.50 657 3 3 983.00 962 1,214 1,218 984.00 1,320 1,141 2,359 985.00 2,000 1,660 4,019 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 981.49' 0.200 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 982.30' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 70.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 982.30' / 979.00' S= 0.0471 T Cc= 0.900 Fretham 191h Precip Fretham_ 19th 24-hr S1 2-yr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCADD 10.00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 7 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #3 Primary 984.00' 30.0' long x 70.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.00 cis @ 12.14 hrs HW=982.72' (Free Discharge) t1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.00 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.70 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=982.72' (Free Discharge) �2=Culvert (inlet Controls 0.70 cfs @ 2.21 fps) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 11P: Rain Garden 2 Inflow Area = 1.199 ac, 20.77% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.03" for 2-yr event Inflow = 1.14 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.103 of Outflow = 0.71 cfs @ 1z.35 hrs, Volume= 0.094 af, Atten= 37%, Lag= 14.0 min Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 0.014 of Primary = 0.71 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 0.080 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 980.23' @ 12.35 hrs Surf.Area= 1,185 sf Storage= 1,200 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 207.6 min calculated for 0.094 of (92% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 164.3 min ( 1,020.3 - 856.0 ) Volume Invert Avail Storage Storage Description #1 978.99' 6,093 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 978.99 0 0 0 979.00 778 4 4 980.00 1,099 939 942 981.00 1,479 1,289 2,231 982.00 1,917 1,698 3,929 983.00 2,411 2,164 6,093 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 979.80' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 60.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 979.80' / 977.00' S= 0.0467P Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Discarded 978.99' 0.200 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #3 Primary 982.00' 30.0' long x 60.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Fretham 19th Precip_Fretham 19th 24-hr S1 2-yr 2-yr Rainfall=2.87' Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HdroCAD®10 00 s/n 02201 ©2012 HVdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 12.35 hrs HW=980.23' (Free Discharge) t-2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.71 cfs @ 12.35 hrs HW=980.23' (Free Discharge) 1 1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.71 cfs @ 2.22 fps) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Fretham 19th Precip Fretham 19th 24-hr S1 10-yr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HYdroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Runoff = 5.89 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.295 af, Depth= 2.35" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_19th 24-hr S1 10-yr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN Descriotion 8,292 98 Paved parking, HSG C 11,891 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 45,520 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 65,703 81 Weighted Average 57,411 87.38% Pervious Area 8,292 12.62% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.2 450 0.0690 1.21 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Sub -A Runoff = 0.41 cts @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.017 af, Depth= 2.35" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_19th 24-hr S1 10-yr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN Descriotion 609 98 Paved parking, HSG C 568 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 2,550 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 3,727 81 Weighted Average 3,118 83.66% Pervious Area 609 16.34%, Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.3 60 0.0670 0.80 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Sub-B Runoff = 1.81 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.078 af, Depth= 2.44" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_19th 24-hr S1 10-yr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Fretham 19th Precip_Fretham 19th 24-hr Sf 10-yr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCAD®10 00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Area (sf) CN Descriotion 3,707 98 Paved parking, HSG C 2,247 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 10,801 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 16,755 82 Weighted Average 13,048 77.88% Pervious Area 3,707 22.12% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.1 212 0.0750 1.12 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Sub-C Runoff = 1.63 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.069 at, Depth= 2.27" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_l9th 24-hr S1 10-yr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN 3,197 98 Paved parking, HSG C 954 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 11,654 74 >75% Grass cover. Good HSG C 15,805 80 Weighted Average 12,608 79.771/6 Pervious Area 3,197 20.23% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.4 228 0.1580 1.55 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Sub-D Runoff = 2.11 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.088 af, Depth= 2.35" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_19th 24-hr S1 10-yr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN Description 3,945 98 Paved parking, HSG C 1,847 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 13,870 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 19,662 81 Weighted Average 15,717 79.94% Pervious Area 3,945 20.06% Impervious Area Fretham 19th Precip_Fretham 19th 24-hr Sf 10-yr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCADO 10 00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 2.3 189 0.1270 1.38 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 6S: Sub-E Runoff = 0.87 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.036 af, Depth= 1.95" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_l9th 24-hr S1 10-yr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Area (sf) CN Description 778 98 Paved parking, HSG C 122 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 8,854 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 9,754 76 Weighted Average 8,976 92.02% Pervious Area 778 7.98% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.7 134 0.1790 1.32 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Pond 7P: Sewer - Ex Inflow Area = 1.508 ac, 12.62% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.35" for 10-yr event Inflow = 5.89 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.295 of Primary = 5.89 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.295 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 8P: Sewer - Prop Inflow Area = 1.508 ac, 18.62% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.95" for 10-yr event Inflow = 3.16 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.245 of Primary = 3.16 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.245 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 9P: Culvert - Lot 2 Inflow Area = 0.385 ac, 22.12% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.44" for 10-yr event Inflow = 1.81 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.078 of Ouff low = 1.71 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.078 af, Atten= 5%, Lag= 0.9 min Primary = 1.71 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.078 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 990.71' @ 12.03 hrs Surf.Area= 316 sf Storage= 171 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 6.3 min calculated for 0.078 of (100% of inflow) Fretham 19th Precip Fretham_19th 24-hr Sf 10-yr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCADS 10.00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Center -of -Mass det. time= 4.8 min (817.3 - 812.5) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 989.90, 691 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 989.90 0 0 0 990.00 146 7 7 991.00 386 266 273 992.00 450 418 691 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 990.00' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 80.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 990.00' / 982.00' S= 0.1000 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf PrimaryOutFlow Max=1.70 cfs @ 12.03 hrs HW=990.71' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 1.70 cfs @ 2.86 fps) Summary for Pond 10P: Rain Garden 1 Inflow Area = 0.747 ac, 21.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.35" for 10-yr event Inflow = 3.27 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.146 of Outflow = 2.34 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.139 at, Atten= 29%, Lag= 2.5 min Discarded = 0.00 cis @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.012 of Primary = 2.33 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.127 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 983.18' @ 12.05 hrs Surf.Area= 1,026 sf Storage= 1,396 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 120.6 min calculated for 0.139 of (95% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 93.5 min ( 910.6 - 817.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 981.49' 4,019 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 981.49 0 0 0 981.50 657 3 3 983.00 962 1,214 1,218 984.00 1,320 1,141 2,359 985.00 2,000 1,660 4,019 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 981.49' 0.200 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 'Primary 982.30' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 70.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 982.30' / 979.00' S= 0.0471 '/' Cc= 0.900 Fretham 19th Precip Fretham_ 19th 24-hr S 1 10-yr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCADS 10 00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 st #3 Primary 984.00' 30.0' long x 70.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.00 cis @ 12.05 hrs HW=983.18' (Free Discharge) t1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.00 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=2.33 cfs @ 12.05 hrs HW=983.18' (Free Discharge) 1 2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.33 cfs @ 3.19 fps) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 11P: Rain Garden 2 Inflow Area = 1.199 ac, 20.77% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.16" for 10-yr event Inflow = 4.09 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.216 of Outflow = 2.64 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.207 af, Atten= 35%, Lag= 7.3 min Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.015 of Primary = 2.63 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.192 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 980.78' @ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 1,396 sf Storage= 1,918 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 103.2 min calculated for 0.207 of (96% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 80.2 min ( 907.9 - 827.8 ) Volume Invert Avail Storage Storage Description #1 978.99' 6,093 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 978.99 0 0 0 979.00 778 4 4 980.00 1,099 939 942 981.00 1,479 1,289 2,231 982.00 1,917 1,698 3,929 983.00 2,411 2,164 6,093 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 979.80' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 60.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 979.80' / 977.00' S= 0.0467 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Discarded 978.99' 0.200 in/hr Exfiltratlon over Surface area #3 Primary 982.00' 30.0' long x 60.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Fretham 19th Precip Fretham 19th 24-hr S1 10-yr 10-yr Rainfall=4.27" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCADO 10.00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HVdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=980.78' (Free Discharge) L2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=2.64 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=980.78' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.64 cfs @ 3.37 fps) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Fretham 19th Precip_Fretham_ 19th 24-hr Sl 100-yr 100-yr Rainfall=7.37" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCAD610 00 s/n 02201 © 2012 Hydr2CAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 15 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Runoff = 11.99 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.647 af, Depth= 5.15" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_19th 24-hr S1 100-yr 100-yr Rainfall=7.37" Area (sf) CN Descriotion 8,292 98 Paved parking, HSG C 11,891 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 45,520 74 >75%, Grass cover, Good HSG C 65,703 81 Weighted Average 57,411 87.38% Pervious Area 8,292 12.62% Impervious Area Tc Length (feet) Slope (fUft) Velocity (ft/sec) Capacity Description (cfs) _(min) 6.2 450 0.0690 1.21 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Sub -A Runoff = 0.81 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.037 af, Depth= 5.15" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_19th 24-hr S1 100-yr 100-yr Rainfall=7.37" _ Area (sf) CN Description 609 98 Paved parking, HSG C 568 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 2,550 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 3,727 81 Weighted Average 3,118 83.66% Pervious Area 609 16.34% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ff) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.3 60 0.0670 0.80 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Sub-B Runoff = 3.56 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.169 af, Depth= 5.26" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_19th 24-hr S1 100-yr 100-yr Rainfall=7.37" Fretham 19th Precip_Fretham_ 19th 24-hr S 1 100-yr 100-yr Rainfall=7.37" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Area (sf) CN Description 3,707 98 Paved parking, HSG C 2,247 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 10,801 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 16,755 82 Weighted Average 13,048 77.88% Pervious Area 3,707 22.12% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.1 212 0.0750 1.12 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Sub-C Runoff = 3.31 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.152 at, Depth= 5.04" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_19th 24-hr S1 100-yr 100-yr Rainfall=7.37" Area (sf) CN Descriotion 3,197 98 Paved parking, HSG C 954 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 11,654 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 15,805 80 Weighted Average 12,608 79.77%, Pervious Area 3,197 20.23% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.4 228 0.1580 1.55 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Sub-D Runoff = 4.18 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.194 af, Depth= 5.15" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_19th 24-hr S1 100-yr 100-yr Rainfall=7.37" Area (sf) CN Descriotion 3,945 98 Paved parking, HSG C 1,847 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 13,870 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 19,662 81 Weighted Average 15,717 79.94% Pervious Area 3,945 20.06% Impervious Area Fretham 19th Precip_Fretham_ 19th 24-hr S 1 100-yr 100-yr Rainfall=7.37" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCADO 10.00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 17 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.3 189 0.1270 1.38 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 6S: Sub-E Runoff = 1.90 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.086 at, Depth= 4.59" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Precip_Fretham_19th 24-hr S1 100-yr 100-yr Rainfall=7.37" Area (sf) CN Description 778 98 Paved parking, HSG C 122 96 Gravel surface, HSG C _ 8,854 74 >75% Grass cover, Good. HSG C 9,754 76 Weighted Average 8,976 92.02% Pervious Area 778 7.98% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.7 134 0.1790 1.32 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Pond 7P: Sewer - Ex Inflow Area = 1.508 ac, 12.62% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.15" for 100-yr event Inflow = 11.99 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.647 of Primary = 11.99 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.647 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 8P: Sewer - Prop Inflow Area = 1.508 ac, 18.62% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.71" for 100-yr event Inflow = 6.54 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.592 of Primary = 6.54 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.592 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 9P: Culvert - Lot 2 Inflow Area = 0.385 ac, 22.12% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.26" for 100-yr event Inflow = 3.56 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.169 of Ouff low = 3.17 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.169 af, Atten= 11%, Lag= 1.3 min Primary = 3.17 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.169 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 991.20' @ 12.03 hrs Surf.Area= 399 sf Storage= 353 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 4.5 min calculated for 0.169 of (100% of inflow) Fretham 19th Precip Fretham_ 19th 24-hr S1 100-yr 100-yr Rainfall=7.37" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Center -of -Mass det. time= 3.7 min ( 797.5 - 793.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 989.90, 691 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 989.90 0 0 0 990.00 146 7 7 991.00 386 266 273 992.00 450 418 691 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 990.00' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 80.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 990.00' / 982.00' S= 0.1000'P Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=3.17 cis @ 12.03 hrs HW=991.20' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 3.17 cfs @ 4.03 fps) Summary for Pond 10P: Rain Garden 1 Inflow Area = 0.747 ac, 21.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.15" for 100-yr event Inflow = 6.32 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.321 of Outflow = 4.05 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.314 at, Atten= 36%, Lag= 4.2 min Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.013 of Primary = 4.05 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.301 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 983.94' @ 12.08 hrs Surf.Area= 1,300 sf Storage= 2,286 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 64.4 min calculated for 0.314 of (98% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 50.9 min ( 848.4 - 797.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 981.49' 4,019 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 981.49 0 0 0 981.50 657 3 3 983.00 962 1,214 1,218 984.00 1,320 1,141 2,359 985.00 2,000 1,660 4,019 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 981.49' 0.200 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 982.30' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 70.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 982.30' / 979.00' S= 0.0471 T Cc= 0.900 Fretham 19th Precip Fretham 19th 24-hr S1 100-yr 100-yr Rainfall=7.37" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HdroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #3 Primary 984.00' 30.0' long x 70.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 12.08 hrs HW=983.94' (Free Discharge) L1=ExfiltratIon (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=4.05 cfs @ 12.08 hrs HW=983.94' (Free Discharge) t2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 4.05 cfs @ 5.15 fps) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 11P: Rain Garden 2 Inflow Area = 1.199 ac, 20.77% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.95" for 100-yr event Inflow = 7.74 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.495 of Outflow = 4.76 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.486 at, Atten= 38%, Lag= 10.9 min Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.016 of Primary = 4.75 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.470 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 981.88' @ 12.19 hrs Surf.Area= 1,864 sf Storage= 3,703 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 53.5 min calculated for 0.486 of (98% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 42.7 min ( 850.5 - 807.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 978.99' 6,093 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 978.99 0 0 0 979.00 778 4 4 980.00 1,099 939 942 981.00 1,479 1,289 2,231 982.00 1,917 1,698 3,929 983.00 2,411 2,164 6,093 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 979.80' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 60.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 979.80' / 977.00' S= 0.0467 'P Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Discarded 978.99' 0.2001n/hr Exfiitration over Surface area #3 Primary 982.00' 30.0' long x 60.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Fretham 19th Precip Fretham 19th 24-hr Sl 100-yr 100-yr Rain/all=737' Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCAD®10 00 s/n 02201 @ 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 12.19 hrs HW=981.88' (Free Discharge) t2--Exfiltratlon (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=4.75 cfs @ 12.19 hrs HW=981.88' (Free Discharge) �1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 4.75 cfs @ 6.05 fps) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Fretham 19th Snowmelt Type 1124-hr 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt Rainfall=7.20" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1 Summary for Subcatchment IS: Existing Runoff = 17.01 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.875 af, Depth= 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt Rainfall=7.20" Area (sf) CN Description _ 65,703 98 Paved parking HSG C 65,703 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.0 450 0.0690 2.48 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Sub -A Runoff = 1.03 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.050 af, Depth= 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt Rainfall=7.20" _ Area (sf) CN Description 3,727 98 Paved parking HSG C 3,727 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _(min) (feet) (h/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.6 60 0.0670 1.63 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Sub-B Runoff = 4.53 cfs @ 11.92 hrs, Volume= 0.223 af, Depth= 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt Rainfall=7.20" Area (sf) CN Description 16,755 98 Paved parking HSG C 16,755 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.6 212 0.0750 2.22 Lag/CN Method, Fretham 19th Snowmelt Type 11 24-hr 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt Rainfall=7.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCAD®10 00 s/n 02201 02012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Sub-C Runoff = 4.31 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.21 oaf, Depth= 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt Rainfall=7.20" _ Area (sf) CN Description _ 15,805 98 Paved parking HSG C 15,805 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs) 1.2 228 0.1580 3.27 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Sub-D Runoff = 5.38 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.262 af, Depth= 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt Rainfall=7.20" _ Area (sf) CN Description 19,662 98 Paved parking HSG C 19,662 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs) 1.1 189 0.1270 2.83 Lag/CN Method, Summary for Subcatchment 6S: Sub-E Runoff = 2.70 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.130 af, Depth= 6.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt Rainfall=7.20" Area (sf) CN Description 9,754 98 Paved parking HSG C 9,754 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs) 0.7 134 0.1790 3.13 Lag/CN Method, Fretham 19th Snowmelt Type 1124-hr 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt Rainfall=7.20" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCAD®10 00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Pond 7P: Sewer - Ex Inflow Area = 1.508 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.96" for too yr, 10 yr snnowmelt event Inflow = 17.01 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.875 of Primary = 17.01 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.875 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 8P: Sewer - Prop Inflow Area = 1.508 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.57" for 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt event Inflow = 15.17 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.825 of Primary = 15.17 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.825 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 9P: Culvert - Lot 2 Inflow Area = 0.385 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.96" for 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt event Inflow = 4.53 cfs @ 11.92 hrs, Volume= 0.223 of Outflow = 3.91 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.223 af, Atten= 13%, Lag= 1.5 min Primary = 3.91 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.223 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 991.57' @ 11.94 hrs Surf.Area= 423 sf Storage= 504 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 4.6 min calculated for 0.223 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 4.0 min ( 738.2 - 734.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 989.90, 691 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sg-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 989.90 0 0 0 990.00 146 7 7 991.00 386 266 273 992.00 450 418 691 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 990.00' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 80.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 990.00' / 982.00' S= 0.1000 'P Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf Primary OutFlow Max=3.91 cfs @ 11.94 hrs HW=991.57' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 3.91 cfs @ 4.98 fps) Fretham 19th Snowmelt Type 1124-hr 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt Rainfall=7.20" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCADS 10.00 s/n 02201 © 2012 Hydr2CAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Pond 10P: Rain Garden 1 Inflow Area = 0.747 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.96" for 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt event Inflow = 8.02 cfs @ 11.92 hrs, Volume= 0.433 of Outflow = 7.92 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.426 at, Atten= 1%, Lag= 0.5 min Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.015 of Primary = 7.92 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.412 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 984.14' @ 11.93 hrs Surf.Area= 1,413 sf Storage= 2,545 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 63.4 min calculated for 0.426 of (98% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 52.2 min ( 788.3 - 736.1 ) Volume Invert Avail Storage Storage Description #1 981.49' 4,019 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 981.49 0 0 0 981.50 657 3 3 983.00 962 1,214 1,218 984.00 1,320 1,141 2,359 985.00 2,000 1,660 4,019 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 981.49' 0.200 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 982.30' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 70.0' CPP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 982.30' / 979.00' S= 0.0471 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #3 Primary 984.00' 30.0' long x 70.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 11.93 hrs HW=984.14' (Free Discharge) t1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=7.87 cfs @ 11.93 hrs HW=984.14' (Free Discharge) �2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 3.86 cfs @ 4.91 fps) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 4.02 cfs @ 0.99 fps) Summary for Pond 11P: Rain Garden 2 Inflow Area = 1.199 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.74" for 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt event Inflow = 13.15 cfs @ 11.92 hrs, Volume= 0.673 of Outtlow = 12.28 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.664 af, Atten= 7%, Lag= 1.3 min Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.019 of Primary = 12.27 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.646 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Fretharn 19th Snowmelt Type 1124-hr 100 yr, 10 yr snnowmelt Rainfall=7.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 5/30/2014 HydroCAD®10 00 s/n 02201 © 2012 HVdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Peak Elev= 982.20' @ 11.94 hrs Surf.Area= 2,015 sf Storage= 4,318 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 51.6 min calculated for 0.664 of (99% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 42.6 min ( 795.4 - 752.9) Volume Invert Avail Storage Storage Description #1 978.99' 6,093 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surt.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 978.99 0 0 0 979.00 778 4 4 980.00 1,099 939 942 981.00 1,479 1,289 2,231 982.00 1,917 1,698 3,929 983.00 2,411 2,164 6,093 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 979.80' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 60.0' CPP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 979.80' / 977.00' S= 0.0467 ? Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Discarded 978.99' 0.200 in/hr Fxdiltration over Surface area #3 Primary 982.00' 30.0' long x 60.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 11.94 hrs HW=982.20' (Free Discharge) t-2=Fxdiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=12.27 cfs @ 11.94 hrs HW=982.20' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 5.21 cfs @ 6.63 fps) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 7.06 cfs @ 1.19 fps) 5902014 Precipitation Frequency Data Server NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 Location name: Excelsior, Minnesota, US' /44 Latitude: 44.8921°, Longitude:-93.554' Elevation: 971 Ir �n�e • source: Google Maps POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES Sanja Pence Deborah Marvin, Sandra Pavlovic, 19,ani Roy, Michael St Laurent, Cad Trypaluk Dale Unruh. Michael Yells, Geollery, Bonnin NOAA, National NEather Service, Silver Sprang, Maryland PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps & aerials PF tabular PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1 Aeerage recurrence interval (years) thlrelion ��I� 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000 Strtin OT5 OA21 0.535 1 0.635 0.780 1 0.899 1.02 1.15 1 1.34 1A8 (0.276-0.459) (0.327-0.5451 (OA14-0.694) (0.488-0.826) (0.584.1.05) (0s56-1.22) (0.721-1.41) (0.781-1.62) (0.871-1.91) (0s38.2A3) i 6-frlln 0.40.520 0.617 0.784 0.930 1.14 1.32 1.50 1.69 196 2.17 (04-0.672) fOA78-0.7981 (0.606-1.02) (0.715-1.21) (0.855-1.53) (0.960-1.78) (1.06-2.06) (1.142.37) (1.27.2.79) ( 1.37-3.12) 15-min ( 0.631 0.752 ) ( 0.956 ) IIA3 1.39 1.60 193 2.06 2.38 2.84 0492-0G19) g.583.0s73 0739-1.24 (0.872-1.47) (1.04-1.87) (1.17-2.17) (1.29.2.51) (1.40-2.89) (1.5S3A7) (1.%3.80) 30-min 0992 1.06 1.36 1.62 2.00 2.31 2.63 297 3.41 3.81 (0.693-1.15) (0.826-1.38) (1.05-1.76) (1.25-2.11) (1.49-2.68) (1.68-3.12) (1.85-3.6t) (2-1-4.16) (2.24-4.92) (2.42-5.49) 60 mm 1.16 1.38 1.77 2.14 2.69 3.15 3.65 4.20 4.97 5.61 (0.901-1.50) (1.07-1.78) (1.37-2.30) (1.64-2.78) (2.02-3.64) (2.31-4.29) (2.59-5.05) (2.8&5.92) (3.24-7.14) (3.55.8.w) 2�1r 1A3 1.69 2.79 2.65 3.38 4.00 4.68 5A3 6.51 7.39 (1.72-t.89) (i.38-2.17) (1.71-2.80) (2.0 -3.41) (2.5&4.55) (2.97-5.67) (3.36-6.43) (3.74-7.601 (4.31-9.28) (4.74-10.5) r xbBM :.BB�er r Q A3 ^r 297 392 4.57 5.40 6.32 7.66 8.78 3fir rom-a vot nx.c ul (s ao-6161 (3967401 (4.38-8.821 15.11-70.9) 15.%-72.5) 197 220 291 3.47 430 5.10 6A1 7S5 8Z1 10.6 6fir (1s0-2.35) (1.76-2.76) (22&3.58) (2.754.39) (3.52.6.00) (4.10-7.23) (4.69-8.72) (5.30-10.1) (82t-/3.0) (6.90-14.9) 6.99 S. 9.73 11.1 12-hr 2.13 2.52 32fi 3.98 5.04 5.97 (172-2.64) LI2. .13) (2.62-4.06) (3.17-4,94) (3.96-6.60) (4.5&7.86) (5.16-9.37) (5.74-11.1) (6.62-13.6) (7.29-15A) 6.31 7.36 8.53 102 11.6 2441r 2.50 (2.04-3.06) 297 (2.34-3.52) 3A8 (2.91-4.40) 426 (3.45-5.26) 5.35 (4.26-6.95) (4.88-8.22) (5.50-So (6.12-11.6) (7.05-14.1) (7.76-16.1) 7.76 8.96 10.7 122 2-dey 291 (2.41-3.52) 3Z6 (2.89-3.96) 3.95 (3.2&4.80) 463 (3.79-5.65) 5.72 (4.67-7.34) 6.68 (5.24-8.62) (5.87-10.2) (6.50-12.0) (T47-14.7) (8.20-16.7) 8.17 9Z6 11.1 12b 3day 3.15 (2-63-3.79) 3.51 j (2.9&4.26 ( 428 3.5&5.16) 198 (4.11-6.04) 6.11 (4.9&7.76) 7.09 (5.58-9.06) (6.21-10.6) (6.83.12.5) (7.79.15.1) (8.51-17.1) 8.55 9.74 11S 12.9 �� 3.35 (2.80-4.07) 3.78 (3.16-4.53) 497 (3.81-5.49) 5.32 (4.41-6.41) 6A8 (5.26-816) 7A7 (5.90-9.48) (6.53-11.1) (7.13.12.9) (8.0&15.5) (8.77-17.5) 9.52 10.7 12A 13.7 M397 7�ey (327-4.58) 4A0 (3.71-5.22) 5.32 (4.4&6.33) 6.16 (5.1&7.34) 7AO (6.03-9.17) 8A3 (6.70-10.5) (7.32-12.2) (7.89.14.0) (B.T7.16.5) (9.43-18.5) 1 --day 4.38 4.97 4.22-5.86) 598 5.0&7.06) 6.86 8.15 (6.67-10.0) 921 (7.35-11.4) 10.3 (7.9&13.1) 11A (8.50-14.9) 13.1 (9.33-17.4) 14A (9.96-19.3) (3.73-5.18) ( -6-3-07-11 11 ( (5.77-8.14) 129 13.6 15.1 16.3 5.98 (5.14-696) (5.7&7.79) 7.88 (6.7&9.19) 897 (Z5&10.4) 10.3 (8.47-12.4) 11A (9A5-13.9) (9.71-15.5) (10.2-17A) (10.9-19.8) (11.4-21.7) 12.3 13A 14S 15.7 172 18.3 7.38 (6.39-8.52) 82311 Q 12-9.St) 9.60 (8.28-11.1) 10.7 (9.20.12s) (10.1-14.6) (10.9-16.2) (11.4-18.0) (17.&19.9) (72.4-22.3) (12.9-24.2) 15.1 16A 17.6 189 202 212 45day 9.18 (8.01-10.5) 102 1 (8.94-11.8) 12.0 111 (10.4-13.8) 13.3 1 (11.5-15.4) (12.5-17.8) (13.3.19.6) (13.8-21.5) (14.2-23.5) (14.7-26.0) (15.1-27.9) 20.5 21.7 232 242 60 d ( 10.7 ) 941-12.2 12.1 >) (10.&13. 14.1 02.3-16.1) 15.7 (13.&18.0) 17.7 (14.8-20.7) 192 (15.7-22.7) (16.2-24.9) (16.&27.1 ) (16.9.29. >) (17.2-31.6 ) 1 Precipitation frequency PF) esfinates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS). Numbers in parenthesis are PF esturetes at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) w 9 be greater than the upper bound (or less than the low at bound) 6 5%. Estimates al upper bounds are not checked against probable n ao,drum preciptaaon I IsMs) estirtetes and may be higher than currently valid PW valuess. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 occurrent for pore infornahon. Back to Too PF graphical Mip://hdsc.n as.noaa.govldsc/pfds/ptds-printpage.htrri?IaY-44.892181on=-93.55496daha=depS&"ts=erglish series=pds 1/4 5/302014 Precipitation Frequency Data Serer PDS-based depth -duration -frequency (DDF) curves Latitude: 44.8921•, Longitude:-93.5549° Y 0 1! C 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 Average recurrence interval (years) NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 Created (GMT) Fin May 30 16:03:32 2014 Aarage recurrence Interval (years) — 1 2 — 5 10 — 25 50 100 — 200 Soo 1000 Duration — 6-M — 2-day - l"M — 3-day 15-min — 4-Gay - 30amn — 7-day — 60 m — 10-day — 2fir — 20-day — 3-hr — 30-day — 6fir — 45-day — ;2fir — 60-day 24fir httplRvlsc.rn .rasa.goVMscJpfdslpfdsjxintpageh"?Ia1=44.8921&1-93.5549&dahsdeplh&rits=&Ql!Sh&5aiespd$ 2/4 5/302014 Precipitation Frequency Data Server back Ic To[ Maps & aerials Small scale terrain � orernera Ferg sFalls Minnesota �'Akxandna -Cc WiprAer {��y'� r Mcntewdeoc a 1 _. _ Edm Warr \ - I *dngs i - - M! ato WtONIon _ 1 ' a A Sioux Falls 50 ktn Large scale terrain C�M LowerLnke \\ ENa arx ereenwwd 5amr .f '�Fml4inr �S Chequamegon Nelmnaf Forest .� La Crosse I Map c Report. map error http://hdsc.nNs.noaa.goJrgsUVds/pfdsyringp ge.htd9lat-44.89218w=-93.5549&data=depth&units=erglish&swies=pds 314 5•30/2014 Precipitation Frequency Data Setter Shwewootl - —. tad 'iry CtxYatmes Laker ... 1p Jf" u 2kln Map t nwona maP r Large scale map M,W'k-- IS rntatttte � 0oef�t+ m cxnwn ea' towertakr E_M Dar 0•ee�wnoc 0 t Scat •vep-r:L!S- I Sct I eke m argtlt(ya!ft'b I Ot45 Lake 4+IFSK " c 40"[ -akU OS chpnha5ien 4PYlIMr' ..*rt 2 km tot Map (R[yortY nwv'enue: Back to Too US Department of Com m erce National Oceanic and Pan osohenc Pdmin'stnition National Weather Service Office of Hrdralouic Dexelooment 1325 East West Highway Siher Spring, MD 20910 Questions?: HDSC Questions(c").r .cov Disclaimer htp://hdsc.nws.ni goNhdsc/plds/pfdsyrintpage.htni?lah:44.8921&Ion=-93.5549&data=depth&units=english8series=pds 4/4 a• V 1a N 44. 4rreN Soil Map —Carver County, Minnesota Map Sok: 1:e516f ptrasd on AWd9Mpe (11" z&S) SlcR. d N 0 30 20 40 60 nFed 0 40 80 160 240 Mappiotedbn:NkD11,10010 Ca CDOa I :WGS84 Edges: UlM Zone 15N W(Se4 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 5/30/2014 Page 1 of 3 Wr 2T N MAP LEGEND Area � �of Interest (AOI) u Area of Interest (AOI) soils Q Soil Map Unit Polygons ,.� Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features V Blowout ® Borrow Pit Clay Spot 0 Closed Depression Gravel PH -, Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp �. Mine or Quarry ® Miscellaneous Water ® Perennial Water V Rock Outcrop + Saline Spot .. Sandy Spot g Severely Eroded Spot o Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sothic Spot Soil Map —Carver County, Minnesota MAP INFORMATION rt Spoil Area The soil surveys that wmprise your ACI were mapped at 1:12.00(. O Stony Spot Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. � Very Stony Spot Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can reuse Wet Spot misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting Other soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. • Special Line Features Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Water Features measurements. Streams and Canals Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Transportation Web Soil Survey URL: http:/twebsoiisumey,nrm.usda.gov µ� Rails Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) .r Interstate Highways Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator which preserves direction and shape but distorts .... US Routes distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the distance Major Roads Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used If more accurate Calculations of distance or area are required. Local Roads This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of Background the version details) listed below. - Aerial Photography Soil Survey Area: Carver County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 10. Dec 27, 2013 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 orlarger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 16, 2012—Apr 6, 2012 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. 1150A Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/30/2014 :�Ti Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map —Carver County, Minnesota Map Unit Legend liner County, Minnesota (MN019( May Uak symbol Map Unit Now Acres in AOI Percent of AOI KB Kilkenny -Lester loams, 2 to 6 0.3 22.1 v: percent slopes KC Lester -Kilkenny hams, 6 to 12 percent slopes 0.5 34.4% KPZ Lester -Kilkenny loam, 18 to 25 percent slopes, eroded 0.6 402% TB Tentl loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes 0.1 3.4% Totals for Ana of Intimid 1.6 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/302014 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 4-0% Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 16, 2014 PUBLIC HEARING: FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW FOR A FOUR -LOT SUBDIVISION WITH VARIANCES FOR HARD COVER AND SETBACK ON 1.51 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RSF) AND LOCATED AT 6397 AND 6411 BRETTON WAY. APPLICANT: LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC. OWNER: NAOMI CARLSON, PLANNING CASE 2014-08. Generous: Thank you Chairman Aller, commissioners. As you stated this is a preliminary plat with a variance for hard cover and setback incorporated as part of this. The developer is Lakewest Development. Property is located on the comer of Bretton Way and Teton Lane. Access to the property will be from, for the most westerly lot will be from Teton Lane and for the other three lots it would be off of Bretton Way. The property is zoned Single Family Residential. There's an existing non -conforming uses on the property as well as a single family home. The property actually consists of four separate parcels and so it was consolidated over time. There's a lot of interesting things going on with this project. It's the preliminary plat review for a four lot subdivision. The variance for hard cover would be Lots 1 and 3 and the setback variance would be for Lot 1. Again they're trying to create four lots out of this property. All the lots meet or exceed the minimum requirements under the RSF district. They all have sewer and water were provided as part of the Curry Farms 2nd Addition so they are available to each of the lots. One of the issues, and this is there's an existing driveway on the northern part of the property that serves the homes to the north and the northeast. As part of the grading plan they are proposing to put in some stormwater ponds along Bretton Way. The current calculations show that they're slightly under sized and they'll need to increase that for the final plat review. We've reviewed it. There's adequate area for them to do these improvements and so we'll just need a refined plan for them to go forward. The second thing is there's a retaining wall proposed just to the south of the existing driveway along the northern property line. Part of staff's concern and review of that is to make sure that that is far enough away from that existing driveway which has a sewer line and gas line within it that maintains the stability of that because when you put in retaining walls they have to put fabric behind it to hold it in place and so they're going to have to look at the engineering of that to make sure that they don't compromise the existing driveway system. They are providing erosion control around the entire site and outlet protections around the, or inlet protections around any of the catch basins in the area. We are looking at, there's a possibility, they're showing this plan connecting to an existing stormwater pipe that discharges off of the southeast comer of the property. However we have had discussions of seeing if they'd want to go under the road and connect directly to the City's system. Landscaping, as part of this development they'll be providing 18 trees between the four lots. That's a minimum requirements under our city ordinances. They do meet that standard. The hard cover variance is to increase from 25 percent to 32.4 percent for Lot 1 and from 25 percent to 28.2 percent for Lot 3. And part of the reason or the primary reason for that is they were maintaining the existing driveway to serve the properties to the north and they represent 16 percent of the permitted hard cover for Lot 1 and 9 percent of the permitted hard cover on Lot 3. The request that the applicant is doing is less than half of that increase and so we believe that is a reasonable request given the constraints of this. The only way that that driveway could go away is if the entire neighborhood to the north would redevelop and a new roadway system be provided to provide access to those properties. The front setback variance on Lot 1 is to allow the house to be pushed away. The problem on that lot is again, with the existing driveway on the property we want to make sure that any house that's put in there is sufficient, far enough away from that so that the existing driveway would have room for snow storage as well as 7 SCANNED Chanhassen Planning Commission —September 16, 2014 maintenance to take place on the existing driveway. The easement is 14 feet wide. The required setback in that area would only have been 10 feet so they're losing part of the property just to the easement. And by pushing it slightly down that hill we can get that. We believe we can get that separation given their house plans. We did look briefly at trying to shift the house on the property to see if we could avoid the variance but the issues are still the same. They couldn't get enough separation on the back side from the existing driveway. This property has multiple easement issues on it. The first one is the access easement serving the two properties to the north. There are two separate easements that are recorded against that. Those properties. One to serve the easterly property and the other is to serve the westerly property. One of the conditions of approval would be that they revise and consolidate all the easement documents, specifically to allow Lot 2 to have access to the rear of their property. This is a perfect storage area for Lot 2. It's in the rear yard where all our ordinance requires for people to store trailers or put up sheds or anything like that. On the south side of the property there are two additional access easements that as a condition of the plat we want to have the developer, property owner extinguish them so they go away. They don't partially go into City right-of-way. They're not necessary for access to any of the lots since they all have frontage on public streets. Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plat to create four lots as well as the hard cover variance and the setback variance. And adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendations. With that I'd be happy to answer any questions. Aller: Anyone at this point? Questions? Weick: I do. Aller: Okay. Commissioner Weick. Weick: I'd like to get clarification on the hard cover variance. Generous: Yes. Weick: The way I read it, we're requiring the variance because of the existing driveway, which is gravel right? Generous: Right. Weick: So I didn't think gravel was added into hard cover. Generous: The City calculates compacted gravel as impervious. Weick: It is? Generous: Yes because it doesn't allow water to percolate through. It all runs off. Weick: Okay. That's my misunderstanding then, thank you. That's all I had. Aller: Okay. Okay with that, hearing no other questions coming from the commissioners we'll have the applicant step forward and make his presentation. Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 16, 2014 Ben Wickstrom: Chair Aller and members of the commission, thank you. I'm Ben Wickstrom with Lakewest Development. Aller: Welcome Mr. Wickstrom. Ben Wickstrom: We're at 14525 Highway 7 in Minnetonka Thank you Bob for that staff report. I think he covered everything very well. I will say that the variances are a result of that easement from, that was granted in 1969 and has been used I don't know since when but it takes up a lot of that hard surface and then pinches us at the comer there so we do feel that's a legitimate practical difficulty and we did, we did have visions of trying to develop the property, including the property to the north and maybe further but it's just not something we could reach an agreement on and it didn't make sense for us at this time. I think it, that ultimately a lot of that problem will be solved if a road punches through across from Ashton Court I think it is. But at this time we're requesting those variances. We had a neighborhood meeting last Thursday and between that meeting and some other correspondence we've spoken to about 20 neighbors. I think in general we received positive feedback. Everyone would like to see different things on that site I believe and we're proposing those 4 single family homes. We got a lot of questions about what types, what type of home. Maybe what price point. Things like that. Though maybe not germane to this application I can tell you the builders we work with are usually of similar style and we think they'll be homes 20 years newer than what you see in the neighborhood now. Two story, 3 car garages. Some of our existing neighborhoods that are under development right now. We worked with a few builders that build homes in the upper $400,000 to $700,000 dollar price range and we think this neighborhood and Chanhassen in general is an attractive market so we hope to have some similar product here. Ultimately it's not up to us. We will sell the lots but the builders we work with are typically that so. There were some concerns at the neighborhood meeting or some questions at least about the grading and the stormwater and things like that and I think I saw a letter that showed maybe a more desirable location for that house on Lot I further to the east. We did consider that. It doesn't help with the setback, as Bob said. Maybe a little shorter stretch of it but there's kind of a point in the road that it comes to and it might even be a little bit tighter at that point but the other thing is that, the grading is more severe on the east end of that lot so it would be more of a front lookout type house whereas up on the top of the hill we could have something a little more traditional so it's not something we would walk away from the project if we had to move it down there but for a house style, grading and some of that stormwater management we think it would be better served up on the, up on the west side of that lot. But if you do have questions about grading and stormwater and things like that, Marty Campion our project engineer is here and he could answer any of those things but I will try to answer any other questions you have. Thank you. Aller: Thank you. Questions from anyone at this point? Anyone? I'd love to hear from the engineer on the water. Ben Wickstrom: Great, thank you. Marty Campion: Good evening. Marty Campion, Campion Engineering. Project engineer. Aller: Welcome sir. Can you give us an idea of the condition of the stormwater management that's up there now as opposed to what you're going to do with the properties? L9 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 16, 2014 Marty Campion: Currently there is no stormwater management on the site. There's a, we're replacing roughly equal amount of impervious surface for what's out there. If you're familiar with the site, there's a couple of large buildings. A lot of gravel. A lot of hard surface out there so our additional impervious is relatively minor. What we're proposing is a couple of rain gardens. You can see along Bretton Way kind of down in the south and east portion of the site, those rain gardens are tied together with a culvert and then proposing to discharge the rain gardens to the east under, or through an existing culvert and then to an existing pond there and the staff report identifies that the existing culvert isn't within a public drainage and utility easement so that's one of the challenges that we'll have is to try and obtain an easement for that or as was suggested empty the storm, those ponds into. Aller: The watermain. Marty Campion: Yeah, into the public system that exists now. Aller: Great. And then at this point what's your opinion on moving the location of the house on, I believe it's Lot 1 and its impact on the stormwater? Marty Campion: The impact on stormwater is relatively minor. It's more of a grading issue and depending on grading issue, ideally the house should be served off of Teton just because of the elevation and if we pushed the house to the east we increase the hard cover by increasing the driveway length. If we did serve it off of Bretton as Ben had mentioned, the grade on Bretton gets lower as we go to the east and yet we still have the wall, or excuse me, have the existing drive to the north that's higher so we're fighting grade as we go down. As we go to the east on Bretton and the wall or the drive stays high so we're, I think we're fighting a losing battle grade wise by going to the east. Aller: Okay. So would I be correct in stating if we moved to the east and the location, that house goes to the east, because we're talking an increased grade there's the possibility of erosion and volume going down the hill as well as the hard cover creating that volume? Marty Campion: Yeah that's, anytime we do more cuts and steeper grades we increase the potential for erosion. Aller: Okay. I don't have any further questions at this point. Anyone? Undestad: Question for you on the retaining wall up there for the existing driveway on there. Do you have any concerns on the, you know where you have to cut back into the hillside into the road there? Marty Campion: I'll qualify that by, I'm not a structural engineer. The wall before it's presented to the City will be designed by a structural engineer. I anticipate given some of the concerns that we'll move it south some away from the driveway so we can get some of the tie backs but that will all come out as part of the design. Undestad: Okay. Aller: Great. Anything else? 10 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 16, 2014 Campion: I'll let you know that I have no known relationship to him. Marty Campion: I was thinking. Thank you. Aller: Thank you. Okay with that we'll open the public hearing portion of the meeting. At this point anyone wishing to step forward and state your name and address and you can speak either for or against any item. Gerald Story: Okay. I'm Gerald Story and I'd like to address you know all you council people. Ladies and gentlemen and Kate and Bob. I do have a short statement and then I have four points I would like to make. Aller: Welcome Mr. Story and just for the record you're at 6281 Teton? Gerald Story: Yes. And my property and the Planning Commission has described as the northeast property. Aller: Thank you. Gerald Story: And my statement is according to state law my property is designated as land locked. However we have a 14 foot road easement which allows us to get to a county road. We have solely maintained and used this easement for 23 years. This road easement is also a utility easement housing water, sewer, and gas lines. I have 4 points that some are already addressed in the planning report but I would like to reiterate them. Number one, we are requesting a minimum 10 foot setback of all structures, whether homes or retaining walls from the 14 foot easement. Number two, we request to have the developer build three houses instead of four to better suit the neighborhood. However if the fourth house is allowed, it should be moved to the wider part of Lot number 1 which I believe would make it more desirable for the neighborhood. As far as grade, I live there. There might only be a 5 foot difference in grade from putting that house on Teton. I'm just guessing but I'm guessing about that amount. I do have a diagram. Can you see that? Where I've actually drawn in the house farther east where you can see. To me it would look, it might help even the four, the other three houses look better if that house was setting there. Point number 3. I have a fear that, in fact I was told by someone that they might allow the house to be built on that vacant part of the lot before the other buildings are tore down. I think there is a provision in the planning report for that but we would request that no permits be given to build anything until the other structures are removed. And the fourth point is, our deeded easement is a forever easement and cannot be changed or altered so that's it. Aller: Great. Gerald Story: Thank you. Aller: Thank you. Anyone else wishing to come forward at this time to speak either for or against. Come up to the microphone. State your name and address. Welcome. Chris Solie Johnson: My name is Chris Solie Johnson and we are 6421 so we are the property to the east of the development plan and my, we sit back quite a bit. If you see our property, you can 11 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 16, 2014 kind of see it on the edge of this. Oh. Either way. If you see, we sit way back, far back and so we've got quite a bit of privacy right now and I know in that area we'll have to lose some trees kind of out front and my request would be, is that we could look at the landscaping on that. I think there's three spruce right now and the developer and my husband and I have talked about seeing if we could keep some on the property line that are of a certain size. Of a certain quality of tree but that would be my only concern on that side. Aller: Thank you. Just real quick. I think I read that there's going to be 18 overstories. Generous: 18 trees total. Aller: And is placement up to the developer then at this point? Generous: They have a plan. They'll work with the City Forester to make that final determination. Aller: Okay. Anyone else wishing to speak either for or against? Please come up and state your name and address for the record sir. Thank you. Marcus Zbinden: Yeah my name is Marcus Zbinden. I live at 6460 Bretton Way. I just have a, actually two questions for clarification. One is maybe the City, Bob or maybe the developer could talk about the demolition plan for the existing structures. I didn't really see much detail in there. I want to make sure that that's done properly and I'm sure the developer's done quite a bit of this work before. I just want to know from his perspective what he plans on doing on the, you know demolishing these buildings. And secondly, get some more detail on the rain gardens. It does say in here that the applicant shall provide detailed planting schedule. I know he showed a picture of the rain garden there, where they were located but if you could provide more detail on the, what it's going to look like and how it's being put together so I'd appreciate that. Aller: Thank you. I think I read in the report Bob they're going to, as a requirement that they're going to take down all the structures prior to. Generous: Recording the final plat, yes. Aller: Recording the plat. And then. Generous: And they were. Aller: In your presentation you talk about the water and rain gardens needing work in the future anyway. Generous: Yes they'll have to design it. They will have to apply for a demolition permit and all the environmental questions come up that they have to do, investigate the site. The building to make sure there's not asbestos and things like that so as part of the demolition permit that will be required for any demolition of the property. Rain gardens, usually they don't have the final design until they have the construction plans for final plat. They will be working with our engineering department to come up with acceptable plans for that. We're going to evaluate their numbers to make sure they're adequate for stormwater protection because as part of the variance 12 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 16, 2014 recommendation for approval we want to make sure they're treating all that extra water that comes off the site. Aller: Right, especially if we're going to increase the hard cover. And from what we see now the plans as they exist now it's our understanding that those rain gardens will be larger for volume purposes. Is that a fair statement? Fauske: The applicant will work with city staff to ensure that the rain gardens are sized adequately. That we have adequate stormwater capacities within those systems. Aller: Great. Anyone else wishing to come forward? Please do so at this time. Please state your name and address. Welcome. Dan Feller: Dan Feller, 6430 Bretton Way. So I live directly across the street from the lots in question. My wife and I have lived there for 15 or 16 years now and we're totally for this addition. This change here. I know there's been a lot of talk about the whole you know rain water and waste water that comes off the property now and versus in the future. When you look at it, any time it rains that whole road, Bretton Way is mud and rock that ends up in the cul-de- sac which is just, and it never gets cleaned up because it then rains again and it keeps happening so anything that's going to be done on this lot is going to be a huge improvement that I think a lot of people are excited to see. Thanks. Aller: Great. Thank you. Dan Feller: Thank you. Aller: Thanks for the input. Anyone else wishing to come forward? Welcome sir. Please state your name and address for the record. Robert Rabe: Sure. Howdy. Robert Rabe, 6305 Teton. I'm at that property right to the north there. Aller: Welcome. Robert Rabe: And I've lived there since 1992 and I've owned it since 2000 and generally I'm in favor of what Jerry has recommended regarding setbacks and so forth and I tend to agree with the observation about the house on the east, or on the west being moved to the east. It seems that access onto Teton just looks inconsistent with the general layout, and I understand the grade is a bit of a problem but it just seems that would naturally flow onto Bretton. And then there are some mature trees in that area so that might be of interest to some. And I guess in general that house on the east, or on the west that's close to the easement just looks like it's crowding that easement too tightly so I haven't had a chance really to look at it in any detail. I wasn't aware of the neighborhood meeting but I'll take a look. Aller: Okay, thank you. Robert Rabe: Thank you. [it] Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 16, 2014 Aller: Any other additional comments? Anyone wishing to come forward speaking either for or against? Seeing no one come forward, I'm going to close the public hearing portion of the meeting and entertain comments from the commissioners. Discussions on what's there and what's been requested for further discussion. Campion: I am interested in some clarification from the applicant on why it makes most sense for the site 1 to have the driveway go onto Teton besides you know the length of the driveway if it were redirected to go onto Bretton. Marty Campion: The grading plan please. If you look at the grading plan you can see as the house is long and linear in the east/west direction and if you look from west to east you can see the grades dropping as you go from west to east. It makes for a, it makes for a nice, nicer location for the house. It fits relative to trying to construct a walkout or something that's more desirable for that lot just naturally. If you move that house the other way, move it to the east, you can picture it dropping down to fit the street. The west side of the house then grade is, it essentially grade is somewhere near the, what might be a second story because you can look. Each of those are 2 foot contours so from the southeast comer of the house to the southwest corner we're rising about 8 or 9 feet. So if that house is moved to the east, in order not to have that entry level under ground as you go to the west, it might require another retaining wall west of that to hold back, hold back grade so you're walking out at that first level. So it's as much a grade issue as it is anything else. There just isn't, there's a lot of grade as you go from west to east on Bretton Way. And this also makes, if you come in that west side it makes a, in my opinion a more desirable yard. Having some open space and some more room to play where you can make it flatter on that west, or excuse me. On that east side. Campion: Okay, thank you. Marty Campion: Thank you. Aller: Thank you. And Bob, either way that house is located, either the suggested or the one in the lot, they both meet the requirements for purposes of lot size and having that house physically on the property. Generous: The only thing is we believe that either way they need that 10 foot variance for the setback off of Bretton Way to make it separation from the existing driveway to the north work. Aller: And a lot of those setbacks are then, because we're honoring the easement in the rear. Generous: Correct. Alley: And that's causing the requirements. Any other comments? Discussion amongst. Weick: Since we're talking about the location of that house I would put it in my opinion we're already asking for a hard cover variance on that Lot 1. I would not be in favor of moving the house and increasing that hard cover variance and that would be my opinion on that. Gerald Story: I think there'd be less hard cover if you move the house. The driveway would be shorter. 14 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 16, 2014 Aller: Any additional comments or discussion? Alright. I'll entertain a motion if someone has a motion. Yusuf.- I'll make the motion. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the preliminary plat creating four lots, approve the hard cover variances for Lots 1 and 3 of 7.4 percent, 32.4 hard cover and 33.2 percent, 28.2 percent hard cover respectively as well as the front setback variance for Lot number I of 10 feet, 20 foot front setback on Bretton Way, subject to the conditions of the staff report and adopts attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Alley: Thank you. I have a motion by Commissioner Yusuf. Do I have a second? Tennyson: I'll second. Aller: Seconded by Commissioner Tennyson. Any further discussion? Yusuf moved, Tennyson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approves the preliminary plat creating four lots, approve the hard cover variances for Lots 1 and 3 of 7.4 percent (32.4 % hardcover) and 3.2 percent (28.2% hard cover), respectively, as well as the front setback variance for Lot 1 of 10 feet (20-foot front setback on Bretton Way) subject to the following conditions and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Subdivision with setback and hardcover variances: Buildine: 1. Appropriate permits) required for the demolition or moving of any existing structures. 2. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits can be issued. 3. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 4. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. Engineering: 1. The easements per Documents T15149 and T17882 must be extinguished prior to final plat approval. 2. Prior to final plat submittal the developer shall coordinate with the gas company to verify the location of the gas line. If the gas line is not within an existing easement the developer must provide and dedicate the necessary easement or relocate the gas line to lie within an easement area in accordance to CenterPoint Energy's specifications. 15 Chanhassen Planning Commission —September 16, 2014 3. The drainage and utility easements on the north side of Lots 1 and 3 can be reduced to 10 feet. 4. Any portion of the gravel surface on the north side of the property that is disturbed with this development shall be paved. 5. It is the developer's responsibility to coordinate access to the gravel surface with the affected residents during construction. 6. The proposed retaining wall shall comply with the following: a) A building permit is required, b) The design shall comply with the Minnesota Department of Transportation standards for retaining walls, c) The drainage design for the wall shall consider the surface runoff that will sheet drain towards the wall, d) The wall crosses over property lines and therefore it shall be built in conjunction with the subdivision and a homeowners association must be formed to own and maintain the wall, e) An encroachment agreement will be required before the retaining wall building permit is issued if the retaining wall is to be installed within the platted drainage and utility easement. f) The developer shall ensure that the wall construction does not compromise the private sanitary sewer service or the gas line in the area. g) The developer shall install a barrier (fence, berm, landscaping or other barrier) between the private gravel street and the top of the retaining wall. 7. All driveways within the development shall meet the 10% maximum driveway slope. The developer is encouraged to consider a driveway design that many homeowners desire which includes a landing (typically 3%) at each end of the driveway (at the street and at the garage). 8. Sewer and water services to each of the proposed four lots were installed by the Curry Farms 2nd Addition developer; therefore, the sewer and water lateral fees do not apply. 9. Prior to final plat approval the developer shall identify which of the four lots will receive the City SAC and City WAC credit. 10. The remaining three lots shall be subject to the City SAC and WAC, 30% of which will be collected with the final plat at the rate in effect at the time of final plat approval. 11. All lots are subject to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Sanitary Access Charge (MCES SAC), which is paid with the building permit. 12. A portion of the private sanitary sewer service to the home located on 6281 Teton Lane will encroach into the platted drainage and utility easement; therefore, an encroachment agreement is required. [V Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 16, 2014 Natural Resources: 1. Tree protection fencing will be required at the edge of grading limits near any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading. 2. Trees required to be planted are as follows: Lot 1 — 5 trees, Lot 2 — 2 trees, Lot 3 — 4 trees, Lot 4 — 7 trees. Planning: 1. The developer shall perform a phase I environmental audit on the property surrounding the commercial building prior to recording the final plat. 2. The existing buildings on the property, including sheds, house and the long building must be demolished prior to recording of the final plat. 3. A ten -foot building setback from the access easement (Doc. No. 14111 and 14055) is required. 4. The developer shall work with the neighboring property owners to clarify the use, permitted users and maintenance responsibility of the easement. Specifically, the easement must assure that the property owner for Lot 2 may access the rear of their property via this easement. The developer shall ensure that the necessary easement is in place so that the future property owner of Lot 2 can access the northern tip of the property. A revised easement document shall be recorded with the plat. Water Resources: The applicant shall either procure a drainage and utility easement over the entirety of the culvert or they shall install a catch basin manhole in Bretton Way just west of the driveway for Lot 4 and tie this into the existing public storm sewer system. In either event, the applicant shall model the conveyance choice to assure adequate capacity and provide a safe and stable emergency overflow. 2. The applicant must provide clarification to resolve the disparate impervious surface calculations and assure adequate volume reduction. 3. The applicant shall provide infiltration/water quality volume adequate to address the volume reduction requirements for the runoff from all impervious surfaces in the development. 4. The applicant must provide a detail of the rain gardens which is consistent with the recommendations and requirements of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual before final plat approval. 5. The applicant shall provide a detailed planting schedule for the rain garden areas. 6. The applicant shall provide a hydrograph showing the duration of ponding is less than 48 hours and shall reduce the ponding depth so the bounce does not exceed MN Storm Water 17 Chanhassen Planning Commission — September 16, 2014 Manual guidance or correct the soils and demonstrate that they are commensurate with HSG A or B soils. 7. The side slopes into the rain gardens shall not exceed three horizontal feet for every one vertical foot. 8. Discharge velocities into the rain gardens shall not exceed four cubic feet per second or the applicant shall provide scour calculations and adequate energy dissipation to assure erosion will not be an issue. 9. Pre-treatment shall be provided to minimize sediment deposition into the rain gardens. 10. Drain tile services must be provided to all properties that will flow from the back to the front of the lot. 11. Erosion Control plan /SWPPP must include all elements required under Chapter 19 of City Code. 12. Engineer estimate of quantities for erosion control and sediment prevention, including those necessary for final site stabilization, shall be provided and used to calculate escrow amount. 13. A Storm Water Management Utility fee estimated to be $9,168.00 shall be paid with final plat. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Weick noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated September 2, 2014 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS: None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: Aanenson: Thank you. The Bluff Creek Preserve at the 6s' was tabled. That's going onto the next City Council meeting. We're just trying to work out, that's the last addition at the Preserve which is up adjacent to Lyman Boulevard. We're just trying to work through construction access off of Lyman instead of coming through that entire neighborhood. We were kind of up that way on our tour. The other one is the Village Shoppes which you saw so City Council did approve that so they're working through their site plan agreement and get that underway. For that project. Aller: Great. And just again a quick reminder for those of you watching who are not present and may not have heard before, the items before us are set for City Council on 9-22-14 so if you want to follow those. Generous: That was a misprint on there. It goes to the first meeting in October. Aanenson: So it will be October 7`s. 18 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION Application of Lakewest Development, LLC and Naomi Carlson for Subdivision approval with variances. On September 16, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Lakewest Development, LLC and Naomi Carlson for preliminary plat approval of property to create four lots with variances for hard cover (32.4 % on Lot 1 and 28.2% on Lot 2) and a 20-foot front yard setback from Bretton Way for Lot 1. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential District, RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is shown on the attached Exhibit A. 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance subject to the granting of the variances requested in conjunction with the subdivision; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan since it provides a single-family home at density within those established by the comprehensive plan; c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter subject to compliance with the conditions of approval; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage provided additional storm water management is provided as recommended by staff, SCANNED f The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record subject to the vacation of some of the existing private easements; and g. The proposed subdivision is not premature is available or being provided as part of the subdivision. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. 5. Variance Findings— Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The subject site is zoned Single -Family Residential District. The hard cover variances are to permit homes compatible with the surrounding properties. The purpose of the setback variance request is to permit a 20-foot front yard setback to create greater separation between the building and the existing access driveway to the property to the northeast. The 10-foot encroachment into the required front yard provides adequate separation between the structure and the street and maintains the adequate separation from the driveway for snow storage. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The practical difficulty of complying with the hard cover is the existing driveway which accounts for 67.2 and 37.7 percent of the allowable coverage on the respective lots. The practical difficulty of complying with the front yard setback is due to the lot configuration of the property and the existing driveway accessing the property to the northeast. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The stated intent of the request is for a typical single-family home on the lots. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The difficulty of complying with the hard cover and front yard setback is due to the lot configuration of the property and the existing easement and driveway. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the character of the area and permit homes typical to those in the neighborhood. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 6. The planning report #2014-08 dated September 16, 2014, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat with variances. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 16' day of September, 2014. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman EDIT A Legal Description Parcel 1: Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 105, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver Count, Minnesota. Torrens Property Toren Certificate No. 18584.0 Parcel 2: Outlots C and D, Curry Farms 2' Addition, according to the plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. Torrens Property Torrens Certificate No. 19182.0 Parcel 3: That Part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 28, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast comer of said tract, thence due South along East line of said Tract 197.74 feet; thence South 88 degrees 4 minutes West 376.7 feet; thence South 1 degree 56 minutes East, 65.33 feet to actual point of beginning of tract to be described; thence North 1 degree 56 minutes West 51.33 feet; thence South 88 degrees 4 minutes West, 101.74 feet; thence North 77 degrees 44 minutes West, 60.97 feet; thence North 67 degrees 44 minutes West, 66.07 feet; thence North 85 degrees 14 minutes West, 35.67 feet to the West line of said tract; thence southerly along said West line 24.71 feet to an intersection with a line bearing North 48 degrees 15 minutes West from a point bearing North 89 degrees 19 minutes West, 190.50 feet from actual point of beginning; thence South 15 minutes East, 92.88 feet to said point bearing North 89 degrees 19 minutes East, 190.5 feet to actual point of beginning. Torrens Property Torrens Certificate No. 27468.0 Parcel 4: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 105, file of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. 4 CITY OF MEMORANDUM CHONSEN TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director Chanhassen, MN 55317 DATE: August 19, 2014 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 SUBJ: Park and Trail Conditions for Fretham 19' Addition Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Fretham l9d' Addition is fully within the park service area of Curry Farms Park and Phone:952.227.1180 has convenient access to Powers Boulevard and Lake Lucy Road pedestrian trail Fax:952.227.1190 connections. Engineering The single condition of approval for parks and recreation is the payment of park Phone: 952.227.1160 dedication fees at the rate in force upon final plat approval for three of the four. Fax:952.227.1170 The lot with the existing residence is exempt from this fee. At today's rate, the Finance payment of a total of $17,400 in park dedication fees is required. These fees will be Phone:952.227.1140 deposited in the City's park and trail dedication fund for utilization on future park and Fax:952.227.1110 trail improvements. Park & Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 Fax:952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax:952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone:952,227.1130 Fax:952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax:952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us g:\plan\2014 planning cases\2014-08 fretha n 19th addition\park & recreation conditions of approval.docx Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing forToday and Planning forTomorrow City Review Procedure Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. If the city receives a written request that does not contain all required information, the 60- day limit starts over only if the agency sends written notice within 15 business days of receipt of the request telling the requester what information is missing. Staff prepares a report on the subject application. This report includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The applicant is then given the opportunity to present their project. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings from residential to commercial/industrial and and land use amendments, which require a 2/3'd majority. Minnesota State Statute 15.99 requires all zoning applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. Minnesota State Statute 462.358. A subdivision application shall be areliminarily approved or disapproved within 120 days unless an extension of the review period has been agreed to by the applicant. Following preliminary approval the applicant may request final approval by the municipality, and upon such request the municipality shall certify final approval within 60 days..... A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. &\irlan\pro edu \public hearing review pmcedure.doc 2014-08 FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION BG Done Task Due Date Notes X Submittal Received (Friday) 08/15/14 X Review for Completion (Monday) 08/18/14 Process Fee Create Electronic File in g:\plan Create Laserfiche files (2) Create file pocket Scan documents to Laserfiche Create Web Page/redirect Install Proposed Development Sign 8 Create Referral notice Distribute Referral notices to staff Email referral notices to outside agencies Create Public Hearing Notice Email Public Hearing Notice to Villager 08/28/14 X Create PH Notice mailing list (pre -application) Create Public Hearing Notice Postcards (Thursday) Mail Public Hearing Notice Postcards 09/04/14 Prepare affidavit of mailing/PH notice list Email PC Agenda to Villager 09/04/14 Staff/Agency review deadline 09/04/14 PC Staff Report PC Staff Report Review-CDD PC Staff Report Review -CM PC Packet 09/10/14 Email PC Staff Reports to Developer/Applicant 09/10/14 PowerPoint PC Meeting 09/16/14 Update web page with PC action 09/17/14 Process approved variances (if not appealed) 09/22/14 CC Update Report CC Staff Report Review-CDD CC Staff Report Review -CM Draft documents (resolutions, SPA, CUP, UP, VAR, etc.) CC Packet 10/08/14 Email CC Staff Reports to Developer/Applicant 10/08/14 CC Meeting 10/13/14 Update web page with CC action 10/14/14 Create and Mail Decision Letter Process documents (resolutions, SPA, CUP, UP, VAR, etc.) Execute documents Process/record executed documents Remove Notification Sign 60-day Review Deadline 10/14/14 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 Date: August 18, 2014 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department Review Response Deadline: September 4, 2014 By: Bob Generous, Senior Planner Subject: Request for Preliminary Plat Review for a four -lot subdivision with variances for hard cover and setback on 1.51 acres of property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 6397 and 6411 Bretton Way. Applicant: Lakewest Development, LLC. Owner: Naomi Carlson. Planning Case: 2014-08 PID: 25-6820030 & 25-6940030 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on August 15, 2014. The 60day review period ends October 14, 2014. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Cbanhassen Planning Commission on September 16, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanbassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than September 4, 2014. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official L Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (CenturyLink) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 CITY OFCBANHISSEN APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Date Filed: — IS 60-Day Review Deadline: 10 — \Lk — \`T Planner: 1� (--,, Case #Ao 1 `T —O 0 ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Rezoning ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD................. $100 ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 ❑ Site Plan Review ❑ Administrative.................................................. $100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts` ...................... $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area Include number of existing employees: and number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit ADS IONAL REQUIRED FEES: [W Notification Sign ................................................... $200 (City to install and remove) Property Owners' List within 500......... $3 per address (City to generate — fee determined at pre -application meeting) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents.. $50 per document (CUP/SPRNACNARNVAP/Metes & Bounds Subdivision) Project Name: Property Address or Location Subdivision ❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 9 Create over 3 lots .... ................... $600 + $15 per lot ❑ Metes & Bounds .........................$300 + $50 per lot ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ of Line Adjustment.........................................$150 W Final Plat'........................................................$250 'Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way................... $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) �/ l� Variance............................................................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ............................ $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) TOTAL FEES: $ I I a" Received from: Date Received: Check Number: Section 2: Required Information Parcel #: �9T�iQ& Legal Descriphoh:gYi Total Acreage. (.571 Wetlands Present? Present Zoning: lup n` Present Land Use Designation: Existing Use of Property: Description of Proposal: 0 Check box if separate narrative is attached G4 1.0- ❑ Yes tr No Requested Zoning: Requested Land Use Designation: Ka llww 4111µPe)LK0Vf 3y Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: L CWI Address: City/State/Zip: _ Email: be -^a Signature: Contact: tn) V%1(%jJ)2VA& Phone: qZf os3.21 e9 Cell: GI -.%- 801, '7112- Fax: If — FS3. ;M Date: cy• /-f' I" PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the informatjoq and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: / �c Address: >o Jo n City/State/Zip: L� iia tten , Ma 5 5317 Contact: Phone: 95.E-1t 7 5°-/97L Cell: -7f4-.19-J L Email: A"I"i - A0 n • cai„ Fax: r /fy Signa ure. vane_ Date: i lV This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) v Name: C'M.PGOhI eNff(Ale > 411 jas(icrf Contact: err c!meliV^J Address: (80o PI411leX- c,Q%7- GEAgF7t— Phone: 763If71F•5-17L City/State/Zip: MBE OL&d, Mn/ 13-31,4 Cell: Email: el a'rter ';PA& • Hn Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: ' _,l[' roperty Owner Via: Email ElMailed Paper Copy Name: Applicant Via: 01�mail ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: [� Engineer Via: [3'Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: 0 Other` Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: Property Card Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name NAOMI RUTH CARLSON Mailing Address 5955 CATHCART DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8916 Property Address Address 6397 BRETTON WAY City CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 Parcel ID Number 256820030 Parcel Information Uses Industrial GIS Acres 0.30 Res 1 unit Tax Acres Plat RLS 28 Lot Block P/O TRACT B DESC AS: COMM AT NE CORN TRACT B; TH S ON E LINE 197.74'; TH Tax Description S88'W 376.7'; TH SVE 65.3370 PT OF BEG. TH N1'W 51.33'; TH S88'W 101.74'; TH N77'W 60.97'; TH N67'W 66.07'; TH N85'W 35.67' TO W LINE OF TRACT; TH SLY ALONG W LINE 24.71' TO INTERS Building Information Building Style 1 STORY Finished Sq Ft 600 Bedrooms 1 Year Built 1940 Other Garage Y Bathrooms 1.00 Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve 0276 WS 062 MINNEHAHA CREEK N N N F_rrT-TTi 2l717 t-a- T Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale (Payable 2014) (Payable 2015) Land $95,400.00 $106,000.00 Date of Sale 04/14/1992 Building $39,100.00 $43.800.00 Sale Value $0.00 Total $134,500.00 $149,800.00 Qualified/ U Unqualified Disclaimer. This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Carver County does not guarantee accuracy of the material contained herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Slalules 466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages, and ra expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County from any and all claims brought by User. CARVER its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the users access or use of data provided. COUNTY Monday, August 18, 2014 Carver County, MN Page 1 of 1 SCANNED Property Card Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name NAOMI RUTH CARLSON Mailing Address 5955 CATHCART OR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8916 Property Address Address 6411 BRETTON WAY City CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 Parcel ID Number 256940030 Parcel Information Uses Industrial GIS Acres 1.20 Tax Acres 0.90 Plat RLS 105 Lot Block Tax Description TRACT C & ALSO INCLUDES: OUTLOTS C & D CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION Building Style Year Built Building Information Finished Sq Ft Other Garage N Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead 0276 WS 062 MINNEHAHA CREEK N Assessor Information Bedrooms Bathrooms Green Acres Ag Preserve N N Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale (Payable 2014) (Payable 2015) Land $102,600.00 $102,600.00 Date of Sale Building $35,300.00 $34,100.00 Sale Value Total $137,900.00 $136,700.00 Qualified/ Unqualified Disclaimer: This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Carver County does not guarantee accuracy of the material ,untamed herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466.03. Subd. 21 (2000). and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages. and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County from any and all claims brought by User, CARVER Its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access of use of data provided. COI NTN* Monday, August 18, 2014 Carver County, MN Page 1 of 1 SC,,Illi City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 Date: August 18, 2014 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department Review Response Deadline: September 4, 2014 By: Bob Generous, Senior Planner Subject: Request for Preliminary Plat Review for a four -lot subdivision with variances for hardcover and setback on 1.51 acres of property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 6397 and 6411 Bretton Way. Applicant: Lakewest Development LLC. Owner: Naomi Carlson. Planning Case: 2014-08 PID: 25-6820030 & 25-6940030 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on August 15, 2014. The 60-day review period ends October 14, 2014. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and Proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Cbanhassen Planning Commission on September 16, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than September 4, 2014. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official L Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (CenturyLink) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco SCANNED FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION - PLANNING CASE 2014-08 $660.00 Subdivision ($600 + $60) $141.00 Property Owners List (47 x $3laddress) $200.00 Variance $200.00 Notification Sign $1,201.00 TOTAL $1,201.00 Less Check 2052 from Lakewest Development Co., LLC SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 08/20/2014 11:36 AM Receipt No. 00260422 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Lake West Development LLC 14525 Highway 7 Suite 335 Minnetonka MN 55345- Fretham 19th Addition Planning Case 2014-08 ------------------------------------------------------- Subdivision 660.00 Sign Rent 200.00 Variance 200.00 GIS List 141.00 Total Cash Check 2052 Change 1,201.00 0.00 1,201.00 0.00 SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO.2014-08 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, September 16, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Preliminary Plat Review for a four -lot subdivision with variances for hard cover and setback on 1.51 acres of property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 6397 and 6411 Bretton Way. Applicant: Lakewest Development, LLC. Owner: Naomi Carlson. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassenmn.us/2014-08 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, AICP, Senior Planner Email: beenerousna,ci.chanhassen.mn us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on September 4, 2014) SCANNED Property Card Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name NAOMI RUTH CARLSON Mailing Address 5955 CATHCART DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8916 Property Address Address 6411 BRETTON WAY City CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 Parcel ID Number 256940030 Parcel Information Uses Industrial GIS Acres 1.20 Tax Acres 0.90 Plat RLS 105 Lot Block Tax Description TRACT C & ALSO INCLUDES: OUTLOTS C & D CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION Building Information Building Style Finished Sq Ft Bedrooms Year Built Other Garage N Bathrooms Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve 0276 WS 062 MINNEHAHA CREEK N N N Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale (Payable 2014) (Payable 2015) Land $102,600.00 $102,600.00 Date of Sale Building $35,300.00 $34,100.00 Sale Value Total $137,900.00 $136,700.00 Qualified/ Unqualified AM Disclaimer. This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Carver County does not guarantee accuracy of the material contained herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota lCM Statutes 466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages. and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnity, and hold harmtess the County from any and all claims brought by User. CARVER its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. COUNTY Monday, August 18, 2014 Carver County, MN Page 1 of 1 SCANNED Property Card Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name NAOMI RUTH CARLSON Mailing Address 5955 CATHCART DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8916 Property Address Address 6397 BRETTON WAY City CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 Parcel ID Number 256820030 Parcel Information Uses Industrial GIS Acres 0.30 Res 1 unit Tax Acres Plat RLS 28 Lot Block P/O TRACT B DESC AS: COMM AT NE CORN TRACT B; TH S ON E LINE 197.74'; TH Tax Description S88'W 376.7'; TH St'E 65.3370 PT OF BEG. TH N1'W 51.33'; TH S88'W 101.74'; TH N77'W 60.97'; TH N67'W 66.07'; TH N85'W 35.67' TO W LINE OF TRACT; TH SLY ALONG W LINE 24.71' TO INTERS Building Information Building Style 1 STORY Finished Sq Ft 600 Bedrooms 1 Year Built 1940 Other Garage Y Bathrooms 1.00 Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve 0276 WS 062 MINNEHAHA CREEK N N N Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale (Payable 2014) (Payable 2015) Land $95,400.00 $106,000.00 Dale of Sale 04/14/1992 Building $39,100.00 $43,800.00 Sale Value $0.00 Total $134,500.00 $149,800.00 Qualified/ U Unqualified Disclaimer: This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Carver County does not guarantee accuracy of the material contained herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages. and is expressly waives all claimsand agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County from any and all claims brought by User, CARVER its employees or agents. or third parties which arise out of the users access or use of data provided. COUNTY Monday, August 18, 2014 Carver County, MN Page 1 of 1 SCANNED PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR: FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MN PRRIECT DIRECTORY CMIES: LAKERESE DEALCPMENT NRL E.A. 03S MBH.1 ] pMTE .5 NINMTDNNA. MN S53A5 PH. B53.B]0.]WO EMAIL'. nnlFlM'SiCF CAMS% IR NEERINC SERNCIS. INC MARTY CAMPION IWO PIONEER CREEK CENTER MARE PLAIN, MN bNA EMML: YNu CIMPIONCNG[K ACNE LAND SUIH"YiNC B1. BALTIMORE BWEER HE .11W 0.ANE, MN SS49 EH 703-IM-52?a MML: PROJECT LOCATION NC SPECIEICATpIS MINNEWIA OFPM POINT OF TRANSPORTATION 'STANDARD AFICATONS 1. CPISTRNCTIXI' LARST EDITION IN S PPLEMENTO ENGINEERS ASWKSATCN OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARD UTILITIES 'AICAPCNS. (LAMST Ep1MN) APPUCASLE FEDER&, STATE AND LOCAL LAW AND ORDINANCE RILL :CAPLIW MM IN ME CONSTRUCTOR OF THIS PRONECI. ----------- ..earesrwMww..> RClIIIVYI JIEl f1VVIlIV1 ENGINEERING LRI°N,_ .�M. P1.N.1 MN COVER SHEET 73-060 ENGINEERING;,„ �,,, a::. N u LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. ,�, _.._oAni VM. P.Nr� ..1 cuCCf Nln R nC 7 CLSETC " TOTAL AREA - 1.51 ACRES EXISTING NAROCOV R CALCULATIONS nan mxcarz �w,a r LY w mmYc wYwm x r aMo m.• e pr« aYama ....a a . u•oMT PROPOSED HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS LO+ .1 r ar ( .12 o°u' u+.L'10a°+aw r �1 V xMMi (p P W-M-YG ¢[v.MnO1 . W.al LEGEM 7 morta urm aw 0 ZXORa aMI.Mr Hta YM«H[ mMT M.a« =�-J Hmm aaxerzrt HeraH rnr rssY.naR wsA'Lnowr vxs[r \ '0.artRTY DLSClO'IfON \ I \ a.,.,a dur�u iw ,sLo I CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT CMANMA.CRFN MN Ul X m«HYORo ` EXISTING CONDITIONS 6 REMOVAL PLAN N P M 13050 LEGEND W IXNDRf axlMl YRf uaxn[ - +RxORf IOUM N1[ a0 ONMb aTi MWTe Rx1Y LOT DATA .Dv4..Y" - 1 11 .. 4wu4 LOi u[" - IgDa s uxaN l0i .Oxon - M n{i 4TMM L01 MIM - of nR an.af .o4.-son Ya-sm. 4a-mrtn x0rt0 DlylOwoM. YTY. ' eaiurco e. wT .Me TnTnw MVNn Np UnT [fmTNn .K 9P' .Mn' WID �D Rnu WM. a KO4f RnM WM 4M M I., Mew"RD. xD WJ4x4 LN uO. n r- Ile ------------- I \ lr MR D[BLTPIiON _ uc wrwi rxem�x wr em ea, xx,•. I �� erxrse �"earrrmmT s.,xw�wFu•4 sr uW. �•m / I 11, _ I. J L_•--� _ _ _ _ _ _ -- _ _ _ _ _ N �^f��I Y^�M�••x«a-a..a,Y.,�uu.,.xµiT,rr:�."Y"_4nr::^.r��rr..��,r MI" ;xym„ ..r r'vti.a 160�D Y y x o� D u ia� in wn N . wuMmx4 •a+ma4 ^•�• em w� a. r+. Tee.„ -..-..-. CAMPION r.M, . m„ x. em v.s•I •r ••. ENGINEERING °6":« ""• "• " •""" s° ""� PRELIMINARY PLAT 13-050 ^+ a Mn. „^. «°".wti" LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT ifs SERVICES, INC. ,•_"^"""^""' w°L.oA ANATLI N.Nn x II, n 1 n .. AL o. ANN. E.I. NCI nn.�m a L.m`rW.w a aw.w ..mid�°a° � M iom Ra."wL. n iw eWcn ntwm4 wN wanm n Y T� WAI TAI ru omWte wiw wi¢o MtnW1. = .mv a¢nmrtta was o LaAIK cm aw Fuunaan eiwS°x wG o wad as uua amFweF NII F. a m `.1 r. . N.M.n* FLi. Imp mown ANT Aln°Mfw°x 1NA w.aw. \ II °m1. i wu110 n`�mw \ mom. u°a°`NA. rw 1 mi 14 rcn IN . "' wa+� m mart r,2 urz ww i mwia�""iu°'w r aaum n M u�i I I L _ J I M mn..Lw a ww..LL.I ML ANLmmZ =FLF.m""'.n:.S„o°PMC F3 _ _. _ _ _ NI NvaF..uAr.mm raw w M Gm. M .rwww. a Lm A, M tM11IKK W31 .1 AA M YNPNR Nl4 GVY.9 MiFYL aTR In R. F%.> W.ILn Id d rPw1.MW FLLV � 1° I=0�1 I.1 NO. OF M W 1. MNIN ..1 NM M NI MIMInaS 10416 LAG Ltq (IkV _ IN, INTE M LCGiMd9WLL IMnSS LWLt A1W[>n MtMnflAF ° dwRf WA M((9Z LmWry ►■,,J uLYc Wn[. Tart M by a Yi-A}-LAN pL nL-.M-IXA. MI.E tt.lL[5 P[UM FLLv NA-11 "� N w 'N. r'� "" FRETHAM 197H ADDITION .. CAMPION PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN �3-050 ENGINEERING L. e�,L .L .L,L..L..�.e.. LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INC. JAT' CHANHASSEN, MN 5-ih Fi NO_ 4 OF fi SHEETS 03/1014 .°ITTw:,-°; � rtr ITT a «;.,;., —A—,: �aX—,.. EA — AI . Au„° AT X,,,, All W, AI AS � b NATILIEl . mv,,, —I„ „rt, A' ' o d � �—„ X x, —nR ,xmI x.f �oETAIE Of•AI[ aTCH WIN MEET ¢xom. n.rtq EROSM CONTROL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 9 nn cOIEtT P poi NYMI,IN " GMIPIGN ""w'a„•a sn, mei mX M, ww°fin FRETHAM I9TH ADDITION PRELIMINARY STORM WATER XO ENGINEERING """A, "w .a+n l: �L:::°•.°•°�ww. LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN IM5 IAL 1 All AT, ENGINEER, wc. CHANHASSEN, MN SHEET N0. 5 OF 5 SHEETS °"'Simarmu Plont Schedule KEY GTY, COMMOKBOTANICAL NAME SIIE TYPE COMMENTS RED SONSET MAPLE; ACER RU ggST BRANCHING AT 8; RS 4 'FRANKSRED 17 I STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER fIR51 BRANCHING AT 6'; SIENNA GLEN MVX ACER A FREMANII SO I SIENNA' 1/1 BB i CENTRAL LEADER KID OAK: QUERNS RUBRA 11/1 FIRST BRANCHING AT 6': go ] BB STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER AMP 'WHITE OAK;WERCUS BICOLOR ] 1/1 FIRST BRANCHING AT 6'; SO p Be R R He 1 COMMON HALN9ERRY; L 11/1 BB FIRST BRANCHING OCCIDLN TAUS T HW R AP J ausTRiAN vNE: vINUS NI 0'-O' 0e L L Nl1 FORM D ou D BH J A K HILLS YRUCE: PICA B'-D BB IN LL M DfrvSAIA TO GROUND Planting Details Plantina Notes ^� .. •• •••+a.meolrel..s..n i.w sn. nu.n LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 13-OW PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR: FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MN OWNER: LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT CURT FRETHAM 14525 HIGHWAY 7 SUITE 335 MINNETONKA. MN 55345 PH. 952.930.3000 EMAIL: CURTFOLWESTDEN ENGINEER: CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES. INC. MARTY CAMPION 1800 PIONEER CREEK CENTER MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55364 PH. 763.479.5172 EMAIL' MCAMPIONOCAMPIONENG.COM SURVEYOR ACRE LAND SURVEYING 9140 BALTIMORE STREET NE SUIT 100. BLANE, MN 55449 PH. 763-238-6278 EMAIL: JS.ACRELANDSURVEYOGMAILCOM PROJECT LOCATION NG SPECIFICATIONS: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 'STANDARD 71FICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION' LATEST EDITION & SUPPLEMENTS. ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARD UTILITIES ,IFICATIONS. (LATEST EDITION) APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND ORDINANCE WILL :OMPUED WITH IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. INDEX G a m w L w,w.= scAt[ . lyEt SHEET N0. D SCRIPTION C VER SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 PRELIMINARY GRADING PRELIMINARY STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN 6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN CAMPION eC Eq,neeniq •LSEFWnlny nen.,'a", m p. m.. Plan. apeeircotim or report had been Prepared by me FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION ENGINEERING t.0. pia�ee. week cmta.. PBO eOe 749 ar Mnd« my direct .,Pennsion and that COVER SHEET 13-050 NO OA, SERVICES, INC. Maple Plain, MN 5515 Paine' 763-41s-St'2 l am a eai r ended P.areee,anal En , = Engineer Mndr the'a.s of the State at Minnesota. LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT BY OEStRPnOM REN9p15 a., m wave 4a4x a=am E-uaa: 79-42ampimen 'pi CHANHASSEN, MN SHEET NO. 1 OF 6 SHEETS DA 01/03/2014 Marta P. Cam -Lc 1 9901 D t _ i I a�i e I I sez02'13E Je e < L TOTAL AREA or 1.51 ACRES I�w — - _ ' • �i�, "" S 5� i. mene" 65,701.6 SF i Ig p6 �, .`s'nl � irJ xs.•= - s - __ - - — -- I N'pp•E ^I SA vaao.00'E i., V - 3Baa 1NCM 90t EXISTING HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS I -_IF I I- \\- sue,_ mr;r_e _ -- --�� ,LL 1s - V TOI.S. NB`m' i 1 .6 13 14 ..,., EXISTING CONCRETE 1 1Y69.s 3 ee EXISTING GRAVEL - 12171.5 Si I I` Y A \ �. \\ �. ,--� _-.� -" --_--••�.�gy �••• _ +� � � 9 EXISTING HOUSE - 1812.2 SIF { I - TRICE A \---.3s� - -" - r • A TRACT C o = I EXISTING BUILDING - 2883.7 Si I - ^ E%1STINC SHEO - 89.8 Si V R.LS. NO. YD5 \ m...m. m� R.L.S. NO, 105 TOTAL EXISTING oo 18.426.5 SF (28.OS1Q V BSI \• -�. _ �/ _ Y —z _ p'.°q PROPOSED HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS LOT 1 - 3587 SF ...�. > r>�� X •r \� S -_ _— - -__-. _- ._ - __^r err A^ a / LOT 2 - 3522 Si �•• > >�>—Y_>Y�yI`I-- _ '2 LOT 3 - 3199 SiLOT LOTL4 835MIT 85 SIT Si WTLOT A - Sf TOTAL PROPOSED - 17,985 SF ` - S \ \ �l0 FARIA c / TREE INVENTORY CURRY FARMS 2r+0 ADD BE141>14ARK: \ • \y. _ TNEES SPK)ES III SNF/REMOJF/GEE-LIFXOMMENIS TOP NUT OF HYDRANT END OF WL-DA-SAC OF BRETTON WAY. REMOVE ELEVATION 982.67 \ \ $f '$�• bR6000B e:ya� °i1 ASM JE REMOVE j I 485E 4.� /1- / �.. 3 w.WKrt av REMOVE 4 WALNUT IS FEE 5 BIA a REMOVE 6 BM ♦1I REMOVE 7 MAPLE 2-35 REMOVE BM >39 IIEMOVE LEGEND \ \ / / m BB M A41 ID REMOVE ' :-ICU REMOVE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION - 11 Asx 13 REV1OVE DENOTES EXISTING TREE X DENOTES E)OSTING TREE DENOTES SOL CATBORING Percd t: \\ / 13 BOXEIDER 2`Te REMOVE TO BE RELLOVED ❑ DENOTES CATCH BASIN - le eOx EIDER ))I ''AVE imam a REGISTERED E0 LAND 9JRL£Y NLL 165, am of Reqittra J TYer. Lv`w Co.nly. YYmmota _ \ IS BOx E1TXP IS SAVE DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE immm naPmly > `>< DENOTES POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD MRES Tmem CmliRate Nd 1658e.4 �• > " DENOTES FENCE P. 2: 1 >� REPI«ement Require a Ito: DENOTES GRAVEL TOTAL SITE AREA LSt AC — _ Whets c me 0. CURRY FNBI6 LRl MacaCh. emoNinq to mei ne VaeG dot tomcat. a Cgier Cwnt 4imMa. DENOTES CONCRETE SURFAIX Tarp Proamfy n mIrviGTREE CANOPY OA AE(15 X MOOSE) Tammm Ce rial Ne. lill I I BASE ME COVERAGE M% 11� DENOTES GRAVEL REO'D WIN POST M COVERAGE 30% I, Pa.a1 m ' 1'll J■■` DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS ( INTERVAL) That Part Of Tmct 8, REGISTERED LAND WRVEY NO. 2% Cans l county. Nlnnma, ewawet ac Iallom: / / POST OEV ME CANOPY w AC(3X IpEB) DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATI11 ON L J POST DEV TREE COMEMGE 5% - DENOTES N(I SANITARY Cmmm:- O O ee Npgww feet of ado hoeaCh, Nana We apuM dEam. G& be N to Point 1ee4 <Mu SI—t BB h r --�— DENOTES STORI, S IIER toPM a miwtm'Fwt ]]6.] feet N M $wN t time 5 56 Net; U Goat ouhT Its to aalud Pawl W apM4q of Vast of Imo V pENOTES STDRLL $EVER tom n dw Nmrce NOHI. 1 ogee sB mwNw then- 51.33 de Nm:m SauN eR na. al ♦ med, U Wa1. 101.]e Ce Nana / REQ'D CANOPY 41AQAENT NeN T dq®wet to WM, 60.9] Iwl: hiC NCio 67 wgrem M mimal ast I e 24 Red, t to o NVN BB on ith +e 3,2189 (31B4ZNE L51 wutm Nml. ]56] Nal la the Rel I- a MOW 1raC1: Mena eau+lraly chiwN F, Ire t- iL to on hm harm eitlr a ) Pin.oi aef Non eI M Sc t5 mwutw TAet hvn . Rod ato Sol NwN Be9 G No 19 mwutw Wwt fi-t Its hwn a5 fee / 15.1065i (25%-5%I X 1.5IX 1.2 Point "aft et pe9mnN4 $wN +5 mwute Ease. 92.BB Iw1 la wb powt Mabg Nato M aegaw 1R minulm East. t9p5 feet to / TOTAL 19p74 SE NOTES: Lerrerre Praaaty 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS/BWNDARY SURVEY Terren. CsliRate Na. 2145B0. REO'D MU ISER OF TREES TO MES(13%LOIN=19,f02 SF) PREPA BY ACRE LAND SURVEYING. Parts e: VOTES CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED. 2. ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS AND nod A REGISTERED uR0 $VRTEY N0. 105, M. oI RegMm of liar Go —Canty, 41nnmN, I TREE INSURVEYING VENTORI COMPLETED BY ACRE LAND RVEYING 0®0 Gi .0 SCUT: IN FEET 1 01 2S to MlN LOT CONFIGURATION N P f%ei E1pl�Mp mlar6Plaw I hereby certify that this p«, VeCifiedYwn PROJECT NO: CAMPION er report hea aem PrePered by me a FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION EXISTING CONDITIONS 13-050 I" Ran. UeaA Curter, 49 under mY db«I Mparviai« and that ENGINEERING Maalec Plate, W 5535E 1 am NIT licensed Prafeaaimal Engineer & REMOVAL PLAN ND DAs RY DEscRranDN SERVICES, INC. Phan 763-171-5+72 anger Coe tome PI the state CUE Minn. LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT "` ]B3 .7°-@ez CHANHASSEN, MN SHEET NO. 2 6 SHEETS DATE 1/03/2014 RENSONS '-MCI: 5c 479 4242 ianmgasn Marto P. Corn ' -Lk. 19901 Dote: LEGEND 2 DENOTES WILL BORNIG DENOTES CATCH BASN DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE "—� DENOTES POWER POLE AND ONERHEAD WIRES - DENOTES FENCE DENOTES GRAVEL —� DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE J' DENOTES ORAN.L DENOTES WATERMAIN _- - DENOTES SANITARY KKR -n—»- DENOTES STORM SEWER LOT DATA TOTAL AREA v 1.51 ACRES EXISTING ZONING - RSF MINIMUM LOT AREA - 15.000 SF MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE - 90 EEET MINIMUM LOT DEPTH - 125 FEET SETSACNS FRONT - 50 FEET REAR - 50 FEET ME - 10 FEET NOTES: 1, EMSTNG CONOITIONS/SOUNDARY SURVEY PREPARED BY ACRE LAND SURY£WNG g _ w, I TRACT A \ R.L.S. NQ 105 znm \ srA9.09i X tF.11er� m'c s OUROF A 21n SF f 0 r............. nuiu/I _ I I S 1RACFB RLS. N0. 28 ss96 SF 15015 SF L \ NWO6 92 1 B "'Wee" ses TRIV 0- / R1S. NO. 105 % I i5M SF I / Is ]ADO .W ,a � O I \ I � 5T I_ I � / I � / PROPERTY DESCRIPTION \� P. 1: Trec1 C. RE(i51dm 1ANp 9JTfY No. 11R mu er x.nl,n, of 111.1 Colre Ceueln ul feria. / Tmele PrtOrotY I Tv.e ry.1iWm1. xa 1a51A.a P. Guests C we 0, CHARY PMYS NO ACdTp, eexonfin9 A tnf ncwEe] plat throw,, Ce'w County, Ylnnmle. bell property Tem. ce rtirwt. Ne. 191e2.0, _I DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMEMS ARE SHOWN THUS: - w-eW '� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I `a That Part of Tract 9, REQSTERED LAID Ssll Y W. 14 Cares County. Morrell peepholes m loollee a+l l Cannwtlnq at M N. — M na rfvL a- M sal of Les, me. food Trwy lw.]A rep: ewa. Sa.P INSeqw a -four- Wmt E I I M7 ssC prow Swq gre 1 ae 56 mewta Eselud p. ed,. Net 1. spm1 .1 set, el Yen .1 lame le M dmMq P as 1 aegw 56 I miyW M s. feet tnmu SUN 66 pgeY . mmulw Weer, 1.11 lest; qnn NVM 11 Oqm M -Fula WAG splol ,wC inrow North 11 1I l____ A., N m l,am, Wn1, 5607 reel: theca N, M Wry degrees I. mf,tes Wet, 2A67 Net to the Rn Ire el feel: rh- -thery of-, sod 'Weal 1F. MT Ise, to w Nlvaclien .it' o 'he 6swing xarl' I9 dpau 15 -Fula Weer how u part a-., ." 80 oegnu 19 -thin. Nbl Up sa 1- 6wn actutl pert of beer, It- Ssuq IS -ruts Ulf. 91 B9 Net to aria pent aevr9 holm B9 dqe 19 -mules Eml. 19as Iwl I. -I,. purl of pp6nF9 BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. AND some property AD CHNINC RIGHT-t)F-WAY LINES, AND BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, even..1fers No, iTf6W0 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADIOIMNG LOT ONES, AS SHOWN ON THE PUT, a.-.1 f. Tract A pltr EpEO ux0 mum,£. N0. ,.os. roes ol f...o-a, .. Tvw. w.u,e cw,t,...-,a LOT AREA ALLOWA&E 14PERNU15 (SF) EXIST. DRIVEWAY PROPOSED HOUSE PROPOm DPoIEW15.5982156 602210. Bss>L5 15,256 SF W1A 0 210A 109%IS,A6B S W29 50 2605 950% N CAMPION • L iF p ea np • Nq PW 9 ° l herdby certify that this Plan. spdcifcOtiOn a report had been prepared by mew FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION LBO. Plane Usa4 Canter. ENGINEERING P.O. uth m direct wPerHeian and that PdaIIN 55059 1 an P awy Ilaenedd PrWlOeelanal Engineer the less the State LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT f11 SERVICES, INC. PrPW 263 47! tT2 under at Of uinneeotd. Ea= Ts0 roe-.zA2 Few m a472-42ampipneng.cvn CHANHASSEN, MN M9rtM P. Cam Fan -llc. 19901 Data : PRELIMINARY PLAT N 0 !0 60 GRAPHIC SCALE W ITEr ,,.E�' NC P-' 13-050 SHEET NO. 3 OF 6 --- I - 01/03/2014 CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER SiNf 4� MN. CRY AREA 1-80 1-0002 MN. ROLL FREE 1-BOO-252-t166 IENEMJNOTE 1. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES. 2. ME CONTRACTOR SNAIL THEE ALL PRECNRKINS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING ME CONSTRUCIDON I'Vol OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONDACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DWAGES To THE AOLMOM PROPERTIES OCCMRl MIRING THE CONSTRUCTIW PHASES 6 THIS PROJECT. 1. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT AL APPROPRIATE UBLII COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST ENACT FIELD LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, IT SHAH BE THE RESPOSIBUf" OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOC IE AL UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WIN THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHAG BE OBTAINED BY ME CONTRACTOR BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CAL (1-800-252-1165). 4. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCOROWCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY WRING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WLL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE COMBUCTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF ME CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAP THE CONSTRUCTON SITE. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRONGING AND WMITANING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES. WANING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLALMEN AND UGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHAG CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS, 6. THE CONTRKfOR SHALL RESTRICT ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE PUANS. ACTIVITIES PROHIBITED OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION BWNDMIES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO STOCKPILING SOILS AND OTHER MATERML STORING EQUIPMENT OR OTHER MACHINERY. DRIVING VEHICLES, IEMING OR SPILLING OF ANY'WASHOUT" OR OTHER TOXIC MATERIALS, 2. AL SUIL TESTING SHKL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING AL REQUIRED SOIL TESTES AND INSPECTIONS WTH THE SOILS ENGINEER B. ME SITE HAS NOT NECESSARILY BEEN DESIGNED TO BALANCE ME ON -SITE MATERIALS AFTER THE SITE GRADING IS COMPLETE, IF EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF -SITE IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES, 9. ME EXISTING TOP5011- ON THIS SITE VANES IN DEPTH. IT S THE CONTRItfdt'S RESPONSIBILITY TENT ALL SURFACE VEGETATION AND ANY TOPSOIL OR OTHER LOOSE, SOFT OR OTHERWISE UNSURAIE MATERIAL BE REMOVED FROM ME BUILDING PAD AREAS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF MY EYBAKMENT IN ACCORDANCE MATH THE SOILS REPORT. 10. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BURNNC PAD AREA SMALL BE COMPACTED IN ,ACCORDANCE WM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE WAUTY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MN/DOT 2105.3F2 OR AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 11. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REWIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD AREA SHAG BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE MATH ME SOILS RE QI I2 TOLERANCES: a. AREAS WHICH ME TO RECEW TOPSOIL SMALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT MOVE OR BELOW ME REWIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. b. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS A INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 13. Al DISTURBED UNSURFACED AREAS ME TO IMMEDIATELY RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL, SEED ANTI MULCH AND BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. 14. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED GRAM ELEVATION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. PROPOSED CONTOURS ME TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE OR CUTTER LINE IF CURB. PUN GRADE IS M FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION. EXISTING CONTOURS ME SHOWN AT 2 FWT MTEWV . AL PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE SHOWN AT 2 FOOT INTERVALS. 16. RETAINING WALL AWL BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. DESIGN CALCULATIONS SMALL BE SUBMITTED TO IBE CITY FOR RETAKING WALLS GREATER MAN FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE POSITIVE DAMAGE AWAY FROM THE BUILDINGS FOR ALL NATURAL AND PAVED AREAS. 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE OEWATERINC AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSIRUCTION OR AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. CNITION NOTES` THE CONTRACTOR G SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT ME LOCATION MD/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PANS 5 BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES MD. WHERE POSSIBLE. MEASUREMENTS TAKEN P THE FIELD. ME INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON M BEING ENACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTIOCTOR WIST CONTACT ALL ME MPROPMIE IDILPY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOORB BEFORE ANY EXCAVATOR TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UOUTIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPON519LJIY W THE CONTACTOR TO RELOCATE AL EXISTING URUMES WHICH CWFLCT WIN ME PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON ME PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE MANED BY THE C0RRRICTO11 W CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE GAL AT 800-252-1IN OR 651-454-0001. "IS RELI r- --- - - - - - - I G:950.00 BENORES GARAGE FIEV / IF= 950.3 DEMOBS TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV / L LL-942S LOWER LEVEL ELEV -- S-IA TES HOUSE TYPE (SIDE LOOKOUT) 0 w w X941.8 BENO6 GROUND ELLV y. — OiAPW C SCALE IN FEET N 'G picas Cre""°err CAMPION tIOar 24 uaA CNnI.• ENGINEERING P.O. Jae n. Meals Plan. MN 55J59 SERVICES, INC. Fpe W 763 479-4242 I, E-MAN: mcenpienlanpianeoycan r reOy certify been rethia ed mevesKati I report Nm been Prepared by me a „near my direct wperMsion and that 1 an a dal licensed Professional Engineer coder the ass aT the State at Mlnneaeb. FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN, MN PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 13-050 No. DATE BY DESMIPTON SHEET NO. 4 OF 6 _ --- .AT01/03/2014 REW9GHS Martin P. Campion -Lb. f 19901 Date: II I tPrr I z V A 11 �r 21]5 ff EROSION/Sits ^'^�^..S I I. ALL EROSION CONTROL GE SILTATIONPAT, CENTRAL WILL COMPLY WITH YINNESOTAS Z _<ls- IDOO I - <-- BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL AND REGULATIONS OF THE 41IT- I Q H- LL=I DOI 9 �^"^ 2. THE CONIFUCTDIt SHALL BE FAMILIM VATH AND FOLLOW ALL. REOUWEMENIS •-, ME MPG NNOTS PHASE II PERMIT FOR CONSEROSION ACTMIITI ROCK C „Z".1.00q � 9 9 IN INCWDING BUT NOT LIMITED i0: WEEKLY ERASION CONTROL INSPECTIONS. CONTIONROL INSPECTION f' \ ENTRANCE 4 �WAl5p� y .'a I .. " AFTER OS RVNFNL ON MORE ANDSTR DOCUMENTATION ON OF ALL CORRECTIVE S BY BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTION?T V �"\ IWWYA� O \ "�iW 1 : q .,. 986 .. g94 � �. ACKNOWLEDGES ES THE THE TERMS THIS PERMIT AND AGREES A&RD RY THEY. \ \ � o. } n _ 966 � CONTRACT F 3. THE CITY OR THE SMALL PERFORM ANY CORRECTNE MEASURES ORDERED 8Y R THE Cm OR THE MPG wT1NN N HOURS Of NOTIFIGDW. \ MCA - ®� 1 Cd{Y 2 4 t AL50,� EROSION CONTROL MEASURES T I I - COWALL 3 BLWYEF IS{BB. WF NTROL �TIOHAL DEEMED NECESSARY BY EITHER THE OR THE MPG SHNL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF NOTIFICATION. INSTNL IHIET — - �- — G-993.0 "' T 5 23a / A. ANY DEPMINNC OF SILT OR MUD Be EXISTING PAVEMENT, OR IN EXISTING r «� PROTECTION_` vg•'- STORM SEWERS ORREMOVEDE'S SHNL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAAV AND1. AFFECTED AREAS CLEANED. .. .' � • W. THE CONDUCTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE FIXi CONTROLLING STAKED X > > :'. _. S WO G sa3 5 LL 989.6 sue, NL SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT UNITED TO STRAW O STRAW BALED, ROCK •^+ = >—D�> - Y 98 S SILT FENCES. CONTROL SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADING ALL. CO ENTRANCES UE THROUGHOUT AMC CONTINUE THROUCHOUi THE PROJECT _ _ >�_ y'\ + -T yy� UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORN BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALL DESIGN AND �a 2EIRO� —(� t-..' I- "_ IN MUST IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING Of SILT, THE OWNER MAY, AT MIS/HER OPTION DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR IN I R ' �O e '- ' ° I _L_ _ W X T ^— ,-_ TTT--- m. WF P TECLED NTpiAF / HIS/HER METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPS IY AND IMPROVEMENTS. I \ r _ . 6. ANY DEPOSITING OF SILT IN WALES SHALL BE RENEWED AFTER EACH RAIN \ �mN \ \ AND AFFECTED AREAS CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT \ \ THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED. ). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH AND MONITORING THE REWIREIAEHT G THE MPG PONT, 8. ALL DISTURBED WAS. EXCEPT BUILJNNG AREAS, SHAH BE RESTORED W1TH A \ - MINIMUM A INCHESAMPLE TOPSOIL, SEEDED AND MULCHED (TYPE Q WITHIN AC 72 HOURS COMPLETION OF SITE GRADING. SEEDING SHALL S/ ACCORDANCE D WITH YNWT SPECIFICATION 2575,EE SEED uM ISO O AD Lffi/ERE C ED OWN). OORWNT SEEDING AREAS SMALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED D \ ~_'�, >�> �/ I - _ - _ _ _ _ IN ACC ACCgiLWtOE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. , 51RA1Y MULCHING gUA1APPI \ S PER LI-LA BE APPMEO BE TWO TONS PER ACRE, FACRE (BE AT A AT A RATE 200 PoUNED PER ACRE (CAN BE OWI2U) IN (CA IN LANDSCAPED N AREAS IF LANDSCAPED WEEDING IS DONE CONCURRENTLY). RETLY) \ 9. CONSTRUCTION SMALL PROCEED IN THE SEWENE \ I e. CONTWGTOR SULL SCHEDULE APRE-CONSTRUCTIONI MEETING WITH ME cm. \ / N.INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. EXISTING CURB \ °.INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING. B. CONTACT Cm FOR APPROVAL OF EROSION CENTRAL INWTNlA1pN AND TREE PROTECTION G. OVERFLOW 'S YA OF RR BOX / e. NNN EROSION MEASURE, I.E.EIGHT ENTRANCE 9 COMPLETE ORGRADIN E G INSTALL AND g. AREAS L SEMULCH W AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE HD OOOOD I > SURFACES. 10. SLOPE PROTECTION D EROSION CONTROL SHAH BE DONE IN _ WITH SECTION 02370 SLOPE PROTECTION, EROSION CONTROL AND STORY D STORM WATER POl1 PREVENTIOR ,, OF THE PROJECT MANUAL PLAN 11. SEWER SONS FLARED D FVRED END SECTIONS SMALL. BE ADEOWTELY PR ECTESTORD PROTECTED UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS Ni STABIl DEFLECTOR PLATE 12. STOCKPILE AREAS WHICH REMAIN W THE WITS FOR MORE THAN SEMEN PAYS H REMAIN MORE BE SEEDED. MINST�D 0 SURROUNDEDFENRCE. LOGSS OIN IBOX � 11 81SHALL SHALL BEµD OILT UTLETS UNTIL RIPRAP IS THE CCURB INSTNILED. IA, CONTAICTOR SHALL INSPECT ADJMENT STREETS AT THE END OF EACH WEmc MEICNT OVERFLOW AT TOP DAY. ANY SILT, MUD OR DEBRIS TRACKED ONTO THE STREETS MUST BE OF FILTER ASSEMBLY REMOVED IMMEOUTELY. y CURB hiAP MaT OWN G urM Wen 3G' ^r T I YLL . � rra M FrrWrmW� wr w •N rXWM a Tr® FILTER ASSEMBLY 6 MI ryU N DIAMETER, Vale 6. ON -GRADE 10• AT LAW PANT 2 Mel a' _r 1•-2• WASHED ROCK �^ WIIACO ROAD DRAIN CG-23 HIGH FLOW HIGH -FLOW FABRIC -I INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL OR Cm APPROVED ECUN. SILT FENCE DETAIL OETAIL: CATCH BASIN INLET EROSION CONTROL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE -Cl❑ DENOTES SILT FENCE (A!PHIC SC.4£ IN R£T 2314 4lH LOT CONFIGURATION N fib /�V LAno ng 160o Pinney c,.a c.me., ENGINEERING ENGINEERING P.o. Bo. in, Y°pla Plan, MN 55]59 Phone )63-09-51)3 SERVICES, INC. E°a_ ,mco„a-,2,2 E-uoll: Pi°nOc°mP�a�e�ycom le,astMilbeen eedbymeIlk°+ion °''romyN°a t W PraPerM BY me o, Ina. my elect aePe.aaife ion +ism °ns ° Eu1 f`en"' State °^°I En � Y 4^.W e n°v LRR lava 0/ the State of Minnesota, FRETHAM 19THADDITION LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN, MN PRELIMINARY STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PROJECT NO 13-050 No. BATE BY SHEET NO. 5 - - 6 -- -?� -- LAT01/0312014 RENSg15 REVISIDESCRIONS Mortis P. Com is -Lk. 1990t Dote Plant Schedule Plant Schedule KEY QTY. COMMON: BOTANICAL NAME SIZE TYPE COMMENTS IRS 4 RED SUNSET MAPLE; ACER RUBRUM 2 1/2 Be FIRST BRANCHING AT 8'; 'FRANKSRED' STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER SG 2 SIENNA GLEN MAPLE; ACER X FREMANII 'SIENNA' 2 1/2 BB FIRST BRANCHING AT 8'; STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER RO 2 RED OAK; OUERCUS RUBRA 2 1/2 Be FIRST BRANCHING AT l STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER SO 2 SWAMP WHITE OAK;QUERCUS BICOLOR 2 1/2 Be FIRST BRANCHING AT 8'; STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER HB 2 COMMON HACKBERRY; CELTIS 2 1/2 BB FIRST BRANCHING AT 8'; OCCIDENTAUS STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER AP 3 AUSTRIAN PINE; PINUS NIGRA 8'-0" 88 SINGLE LEADER; FULL FORM TO GROUND BH 3 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE; PICEA GLAUCA 8 -0" Be SINGLE LEADER; FULL FORM DENSATA TO GROUND Planting Details /�'vmxE our walluaoPll .wxp16 / IUIE IE1CL6 � l�mR1E M I<AEI:Im iWOES as u afmimlb bed the (1r) Ycw w MO 4 YYMIM x a 'a' Pr� na Pwxs s' taws mvm tWc) as m frm xl.) ®nW 6 new S (w.x]w ]YS STwCO 1, y aMl1E0 asso tressesstdoNSrS . ) 1415 @dadllt�wddd a /IIp.M IIE at 'anxaN 91r �M TEE Tl Nm5 EaM as IOC WLI 14. W tR'RrM4M. W aL 1 .)� 4 51MY. 1• COM O SP .. MM nd - ba so VL[ i iRM. Y afar . xms u g m wm sRwRn LL. Y .1 NC sal or wi]E a.." W SIR fw WMY W1 1RRM11EIC del adm O.. PUxr MR - N sdr rt . Y WiWx' WAr LL RWI M MN ylpm LL 50. Y SC6 MO Ba1rW Cr 4]L. MFR's Ssse rw Yi 401 OLL O gym® KfRRY SrCR rwWMY Wi A.®w t9fK.iFD S4 YaxC IOMC II weal W IWw SL91 MwoMream deWMmahR4Kbassi Planting Notes OMOE t. WxISCIOR 9WL [artln aOpIG be axL• (61a%-0a0 v mo-7y-ItM) ro M1sY ILGtib6 ar w1 IllaEwwOLxa NNxS pwax m umru.nw w Aw awns w wavix wmwz i .CIWL l[fI141 ff Rw1r WIFIIYL 6 AB6T m i40 wY SIIE CMIn46 1 NO RMINr x11 Y x6fw1ID INr4 Nl OYOX6 wU W16MLIKM W$ ®1 (.OIREIm M M WFLUiE NFA x. NL AI®1mnxM M5r BE wNiOhO BI 11E UMSTME wtlMIER PROI m 519Y59w Of w1Y W wO/Ox PTE 6Y 11E WOSCI➢[ NMIRCIM. 5. CGIIaKIwI PVIL pwwnE 1x0 KM OW WIFF 6 wL RMf WiF1011S llE OlWI11FE E016 d 11E WE ff 11E INp9W£ IMIIFCR w 0/fXs Wllip CCk9LW3 Of TI[ Wlpl RMIIMG. NAILOExf %NIr WRICY SIVLL IWE . OE YfiN OVbwIFF 0.'YFKJC IpYI NMnxG x wl wens m c P40EN wlaE rxEmr.amwr wIb/w Wor, svmfr ap¢ PVLL AOEI[ m ear a xw WIFD n, nE IWOxIF 5pW/@ ru nwns swu a rlxz fsW aYw3. rtsn x0lxos. xwa llc wz nlwrs PWL E nez mlI xot�sac vwz xaul. w avorolle:. wl nywrs swu a fxsz amM exoierl w ffla �. wz wxls nwl Ilea Iewx IEwmr Pulxrsla wo vwxc. wr�mous rah swu Iwc rx mauaEa wx LLiau wo . wart ro emx wro w xo � npal sa y. wwrs ro feo Awww s*wnno fw xus:xr sma (wa ml-zow w fm* a�lr wmw7 xmmarrs mx s� wo irrt sPmm. a wwrs ro a lswlm a v[x PwuEo are wannc rwcr¢c Y. Rwlls SWII E YQN16Y Nw1iED Wpl MOK .R PIE ANRRI TELL-M W1f1OLS i IEL4SMIY: 1FICOlwfY alY. lo. vPw ro wzrtex:, mar wsr rWr are xam mww/mm war a lapA1E0 w nE mr w ra wlm x euws rac b ms a xm nE asc sn awl a sfA1wID b0xx m are xpm aauw/xaal wEl xxw yw Elam s emus rae 4 vvMm, are ww oxuw/xWr mwx PWl ff ls[rI w amxnr xve nxPen wxn lI. avol rov w axxys a s MmfIW$ IesxwC xw w ronm 0.EIrs: smn Mw Pfw arm wr pat lz vnxe wMs As xsusswr - wx PwwMO xln4xl' rxMna wa ro casetT paw ewlwrc. 11 xwa ru Pmm-0vOfo rms - fASm rov wIo Eomfl. x m ww Is 1.. Pwc ar racy avrorw; Ievosnall vtwx war PA¢ r xw wxe wmx ore wwl rs. tt x® mar sax wlulpllons avu x rcmrvep ww Pe sw WIIMIOIe vPw ro wwnx� uzlascwc mxmyelax Pull xam ulosrwE 1w'llI¢* fw nE x®w Aw sm AIEIdMR. Is. ar.Eu Par m true m xx/aal PAIOMa srvsrwnw sn (s¢zn mean E'woq wo ro sx °arwc roo sax mmfl sim mEc a wols. xoaa un¢p elw obe we sle59x fares .wp ux¢ xFFUs wtss sv[CEEn OnExsg mr6rRUnnl mISM:Im sax ro S Isom m .S p[vnl a u• (z IWQ.+YIsIEIIMI 1 I' Rebel Mbaln wMm rac Iu. Ml shxw m.xma xms fmaEl amour wEns) awl Wlc dun E.TSFII franc, r w 9EEOOFa xMmxdm Euw rnax .ro vwlxy-lam Pwx auwxo (w LnwU snr moxc rxz fywla awl a wcm am sMbm n.Pws wa w MAP r fxol are mfmfs w llwwmi ,Mzs, ua� aE� war smwxs fw fmwla woes v eph. vraaw w alxos ro a PAab wIx 91xFa0m IElmxaaa 91wt Ixwl wpxo wl raB /ro PPo16 axle m wtw snmw wrmale (woe wauac). Is. MM wxS a tell IWOIxWO eM sl aVLL K IRD wE•M wl IIRS IIIM alb MEA4 to ILL a6TlHa MFAs ro H 9VaFa 1MF1T a1MO1xEF xoRO. Sur m E Srwpllm W A Wx11 Np nefte lluACRAes IW yl sW MFAS PVLL eshedweee aw t w mvsdx rmo wEo ro ieMac cxaa .ao EralE tlwllYE sfafss a xr w ax.ma swu a srx®. ]a. wKbAx es PWL tGDsdv K2f4Vfr W1FIxXC w qwl! Wipa15 1MIR eE gwll C NLLY 6INlHe11 w aE�mMN SAtp1 6 a4RlMNV. aMG MLL N]r PR0.10E W1W fw CWIRCIa0. sf. %➢IR IERKE w GxOIC SID/S®K eEWM➢ fw xM1 PwL{lY WFIMa MEAS .NIMFMr ra eE 512 aSIV® aIRMC fLMSmSi✓JN. zz xssm wl nx.a ro vxavm•r rewr vurmxc wvrpoxs .r xo msr m owl or report has been prepared by me or under my direct supa lao and tht I mm a professional Landscape Aral under the laws of the State of Menewal FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN,MN 0 b 60 L� all scut m rtcr PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN I 13-050 - 6 6 SHEETS °A ovo3izola ,e PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR.0 FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION II NO. I DATE I BY I DESCRIPTION I REVISIONS N CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC • Civil Engineering • Land Planning 1800 Pioneer Creek Center, P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 763-479-5172 Fax: 763-479-4242 E—Mail: mcampion0campioneng.com CHANHASSEN, MN I hereby certify that this plan, specificatio or report has been prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Martin P. ComDion —Lic. A 19901 Date: FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN, MN PROJECT DIRECTORY OWNER: LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT CURT FRETHAM 14525 HIGHWAY 7 SUITE 335 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 PH. 952.930.3000 EMAIL: CURTF@LWESTDEV.COM ENGINEER: CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. MARTY CAMPION 1800 PIONEER CREEK CENTER MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55364 PH. 763.479.5172 EMAIL: MCAMPION©CAMPIONENG.COM SURVEYOR: ACRE LAND SURVEYING 9140 BALTIMORE STREET NE SUIT 100, BLANE, MN 55449 PH. 763-238-6278 EMAIL: JS.ACRELANDSURVEYOGMAIL.COM PROJECT LOCATION NG SPECIFICATIONS: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD ;IFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" LATEST EDITION & SUPPLEMENTS. ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARD UTILITIES ;IFICATIONS. (LATEST EDITION) APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND ORDINANCE WILL ;OMPLIED WITH IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. INDEX 0 30 60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION 1 COVER SHEET 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 PRELIMINARY GRADING 5 PRELIMINARY STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN 6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN COVER SHEET SHEET NO. 1 OF 6 PROJECT NO: 13-050 SHEETS 1 01 /03/2014 TOTAL AREA = 1.51 ACRES 65,701.6 SF EXISTING HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS EXISTING CONCRETE - 1469.5 SF EXISTING GRAVEL - 12171.5 SF EXISTING HOUSE - 1812.2 SF EXISTING BUILDING - 2883.7 SF EXISTING SHED - 89.6 SF TOTAL EXISTING = 18,426.5 SF (28.05%) PROPOSED HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS LOT 1 - 3587 SF LOT 2 - 3522 SF LOT 3 - 3199 SF LOT 4 - 3585 SF OUTLOT A - 1901 SF OUTLOT B - 2191 SF TOTAL PROPOSED = 17,985 SF I 1 O i � S 1 I I S82'02'13"E o 38.42 _. S6r44 e z r Z \ \ O Li 63: L 'TRACT B o 1, _FL.S. NO. TRACT A R.L.S. NO. 105 20.78 S89'49'39:E__ 1e�c 4 "oar 6;�0p W', a `Uya 13g.4 1 SFan NP L i I In I r SE G Jr rrt , l l a - "' 1n S77'44 `- s / _._-210;&5 f - 378, v.a-_._y88D4.D0E-_58.00 ---- 8'D400"W 56.00 S8 � frrrrrrrrfrrrr 4 __- TRACT"C 1 / o t rnlrrrrrrlfnlrr �___ __ ,t a R,l S. NO. 105 f i �Al �, . <`• •,., _rrrrlrrrrrrlrrrtrtrirrfnrrrrrl4rrrrmrrrrrrmrtri7rtrrtnrnllrnrrrrrr1 !. �j� p l !/111vl 1wl_ �l LLr11rU�� 1s4f rrtlrLUU1LrL U/1/ 1 � r1LLr1f , "� ON ;11f a` sa OUTLOT C qy - o TREE INVENTORY 11 11.394. �' CURRY FARMS 2ND ADD f TiffiE# SPECIES N+iCil SAS'EfREtrAOVE%ilff-SiT1E/COMMENTS BENCHMARK: _ �iA TOP NUT OF HYDRANT END OF CUL-DA-SAC \ s0000�s' ry OF BRETTON WAY. e `'1 =55'39'S8" ,� 1 OAK 38 REMOVE ELEVATION = 982.67 co s R=50.00 Jaw 5 v 2 ASH 34 REMOVE n- a vw N 48.58 1P. ', 3 WALNUT 2-12 REMOVE o 'off 4 WALNUT 16 REMOVE z p r 5 ELM 18 REMOVE ` 6 ELM 4-11 REMOVE 7 MAPLE 2-15 REMOVE 8 ELM 3-13 REMOVE 9 ASH 10 REMOVE LEGEND ,./" 10 am 2-2D REMOVE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION rr f 11 ASH 13 0DENOTES REMOVE12 EXISTING TREE ELM 14 REMOVE f DENOTES SOIL BORING Parcel 1: 13 BOX ELDER 214 SAVE DENOTES - EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED DENOTES CATCH BASIN Tract C. REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 105, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. 14 BOX ELDER 211 SAVE DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE Torrens Property 15 BOX ELDER T- .:; SAVE -- - DENOTES POWER POLE AND OVERHEAD WIRES Torrens Certificate No. 18584.0. - DENOTES FENCE Parcel 2: Replacement Requirements DENOTES GRAVEL TOTAL SITE AREA LS1AC Outlets C and D, CURRY FARMS 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. EXISTING TREE CANOPY 0.4, AC (15 X U199SF) DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE Torrens Property Torrens Ce rtificate No. 19182.0. BASE LINE COVERAGE 2S1X DENOTES GRAVEL REGIV NNN POST DEV COVERAGE 309L - - Parcel 3: DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS (2' INTERVAL) That part of Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 28, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: POST DEV TREE CANOPY 0.1. AC (3 X 1ARS) DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION POST DEV TREE COVERAGE S% DENOTES WATERMAIN Commencing at the Northeast corner of said tract, thence due South along East line of said Tract 197.74 feet; thence South 88 degrees 4 minutes West 376.7 feet; thence South 1 degree 56 minutes East, 65.33 feet to actual point of beginning of tract of land DENOTES SANITARY SEWER to be described; thence North 1 degree 56 minutes West 51.33 feet; thence South 88 degrees 4 minutes West, 101.74 feet; thence ROXD CANOPY REPACIEMENT DENOTES STORM SEWER North 77 degrees 44 minutes West, 60.97 feet; thence North 67 degrees 44 minutes West, 66.07 feet; thence North 85 degrees 14 minutes West, 35.67 feet to the West line of said tract; thence southerly along said West line 24.71 feet to an intersection with a 3,388SF (3(%-2S%)1.S1 line bearing North 48 degrees 15 minutes West from a point bearing North 89 degrees 19 minutes West, 190.50 feet from actual 15,786 SF X 1.51 X 1.2 point of beginning; thence South 15 minutes East, 92.88 feet to said point bearing North 89 degrees 19 minutes East, 190.5 feet to actual point of beginning. TOTAL 19,0745E NOTES: Torrens Property 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS/BOUNDARY SURVEY Torrens Certificate No. 27468.0. RMD NUMBER OF TREES 19 TREES (18X 1.089=19,602 SF( PREPARED BY ACRE LAND SURVEYING. Parcel 4: 2. ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS AND Tract A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY N0. 105, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. NOTES CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED. 1. TREE INVENTORY COMPLETED BY ACRE LAND SIJRVEY114G 0 30 60 - - --- GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 01 123Z14 MLH LOT CONFIGURATION N • Civil Engineering • Land Planning CAMPION 1800 Pioneer Creek Center, P.O. Box 249 ENGINEERING Maple Plain, MIN 55359 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report has been prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 ama duly licensed Professional Engineer FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVAL PLAN PROJECT NO: 13-050 SERVICES INC. Phone: 763-47479-5172 Fax: 763ompion 242 E-Mail: mcampion(�campioneng.com under r the laws of the State of Minnesota. CHANHASSEN MIN N0. DATE BY DESCRIPTION SHEET N 0 2 0 E 6 SHEETS DATE:01 /03/2014 REVISIONS Martin P. Campion 19901 -Lic. # Date: , . CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 EXISTING DRIV MN. TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 RELOCATED TC GENERAL NOTES 1. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT ALL APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPOSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (1-800-252-1166). 4. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. THIS REQUIREMENT WILL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. THE. DUTY OF THE ENGINEER OR THE DEVELOPER TO CONDUCT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN, ON OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTRICT ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS. ACTIVITIES PROHIBITED OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION BOUNDARIES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: STOCKPILING SOILS AND OTHER MATERIAL, STORING EQUIPMENT OR OTHER MACHINERY, DRIVING VEHICLES, LEAKING OR SPILLING OF ANY "WASHOUT' OR OTHER TOXIC MATERIALS. 7. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTES AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 8. THE SITE HAS NOT NECESSARILY BEEN DESIGNED TO BALANCE THE ON —SITE MATERIALS. AFTER THE SITE GRADING IS COMPLETE, IF EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF —SITE IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES. 9. THE EXISTING TOPSOIL ON THIS SITE VARIES IN DEPTH. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY THAT ALL SURFACE VEGETATION AND ANY TOPSOIL OR OTHER LOOSE, SOFT OR OTHERWISE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL BE REMOVED FROM THE BUILDING PAD AREAS PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY EMBANKMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS REPORT. 10. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE QUALITY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MN/DOT 2105.3F2 OR AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 11. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD AREA SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS REPORT. 12. TOLERANCES: a. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. b. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS Yz INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 13. ALL DISTURBED UNSURFACED AREAS ARE TO IMMEDIATELY RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL, SEED AND MULCH AND BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. 14. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE OR GUTTER LINE IF CURB. PLAN GRADE IS TO FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION. EXISTING CONTOURS ARE SHOWN AT 2 FOOT INTERVALS. ALL PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE SHOWN AT 2 FOOT INTERVALS. 16. RETAINING WALL SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. DESIGN CALCULATIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR RETAINING WALLS GREATER THAN FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT. 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE BUILDINGS FOR ALL NATURAL AND PAVED AREAS. 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DEWATERING AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION OR AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. CAUTION NOTES: THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND, WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT ALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY 01 THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. EXISTING TO BE RE A G=950.00 ---+ DENOTES GARAGE ELEV TF= 950.3 DENOTES TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV LL=942.3 DENOTES LOWER LEVEL ELEV S—LO DENOTES HOUSE TYPE (SIDE LOOKOUT) X941 8 DENOTES GROUND ELEV �l 0 30 60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 01 23 14 MLH I LOT CONFIGURATION N • Civil Engineering • Land Planning i nereoy cert]Ty tnot tnis plan, specification PROJECT NO: CAMPION 9 9 9 or report has been prepared by me or FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION 1800 Pioneer Creek Center, under my direct supervision and that PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN P.O. Box 249 LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT 13-050 ENGINEERING Maple Plain, MN 55359 1 am a duly licensed Professional Engineer SERVICES INC. Phone: 763-479-5172 under the laws of the State of Minnesota. NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION ' Fax: 763-479-4242 j ^ DATE: REVISIONS E—Mail: mcompion®campioneng.com Martin P. Campion —Lic. # 19901 Date: CHANHASSEN, MN SHEET HEET V O . `� OF 6 SHEETS HEETS 01 /03/2014 I EROSION/SILTATION CONTROL 1. ALL EROSION CONTROL AND SILTATION CONTROL WILL COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA'S BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL AND REGULATIONS OF THE CITY. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FAMILIAR WIITH AND FOLLOW ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA NPDES PHASE II PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: WEEKLY EROSION CONTROL INSPECTIONS, INSPECTION AFTER 0.5" RAINFALL OR MORE AND DOCUMENTATION OF ALL CORRECTIVE MEASURES. BY BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGES THE TERMS OF THIS PERMIT AND AGREES TO ABIDE BY THEM. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ANY CORRECTIVE MEASURES ORDERED BY THE CITY OR THE MPCA WITHIN 24 HOURS OF NOTIFICATION. ALSO, ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES DEEMED NECESSARY BY EITHER THE CITY OR THE MPCA SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF NOTIFICATION. 4. ANY DEPOSITING OF SILT OR MUD ON EXISTING PAVEMENT, OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALE'S SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AND AFFECTED AREAS CLEANED. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STAKED STRAW BALES, ROCK ENTRANCES AND/OR SILT FENCES. CONTROL SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALL DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY, AT HIS/HER OPTION DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR IN HIS/HER METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. 6. ANY DEPOSITING OF SILT IN SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AND AFFECTED AREAS CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE SILT FENCES SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH AND MONITORING THE REQUIREMENT OF THE MPCA PERMIT. 8. ALL DISTURBED AREAS, EXCEPT BUILDING AREAS, SHALL BE RESTORED WITH A MINIMUM 4 INCHES TOPSOIL, SEEDED AND MULCHED (TYPE 1) WITHIN 72 HOURS OF COMPLETION OF SITE GRADING. SEEDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT SPECIFICATION 2575, SEED MIX 150 ® 40 LBS/ACRE (OR APPROVED EQUAL). DORMANT SEEDING AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS, STRAW MULCHING QUANTITY SHALL BE TWO TONS PER ACRE, FERTILIZER (10-10-20) SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 200 POUNDS PER ACRE (CAN BE OMITTED IN LANDSCAPED AREAS IF LANDSCAPED SEEDING IS DONE CONCURRENTLY). 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED IN THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE: a.CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE A PRE —CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE CITY. b.INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. c.INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING. d. CONTACT CITY FOR APPROVAL OF EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION AND TREE PROTECTION FENCING. e. MAINTAIN EROSION MEASURE, I.E. SILT FENCE, ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. f. COMPLETE SITE GRADING TOLERANCING. g.INSTALL SEED AND MULCH ON AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE HARD SURFACES. 10. SLOPE PROTECTION AND EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 02370 SLOPE PROTECTION, EROSION CONTROL AND STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN OF THE PROJECT MANUAL. 11. ALL STORM SEWER INLETS AND FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED. 12. STOCKPILE AREAS WHICH REMAIN ON THE SITE FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS SHALL BE SEEDED, MULCHED, AND SURROUNDED BY SILT FENCE. 13. BIO LOGS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT PIPE INLETS AND OUTLETS UNTIL RIPRAP IS INSTALLED. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT ADJACENT STREETS AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY. ANY SILT, MUD OR DEBRIS TRACKED ONTO THE STREETS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. AL POST 6' MIN. LENGTH POST AT 4' MAX. SPACING rGEOTEXTILE FABRIC FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH. DIRECTION OF BACKFlLL NTH TAMPED 30" MIN RUNOFF FLOW NATURAL SOIL P� Lf 6"MIN 2' IMIN 6"_ I p�c7 MIN — I EMBEDMENT SILT FENCE DETAIL r, r, DENOTES SILT FENCE ROCK ENTRAP INSTALL INLET PROTECTION EXISTING CURB )F DEFLECTOR PLATE OVERFLOW IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY XL77 FILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" ON —GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG-23 HIGH FLOW 'HIGH —FLOW FABRIC INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. DETAIL: CATCH BASIN INLET EROSION CONTROL INSTALL INLET PROTECTION ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 0 30 60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 01 23 14 MLH I LOT CONFIGURATION N • Civil Engineering • Land Planning CAMPION 1800 Pioneer Creek Center, ENGINEERING P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, MN 55359 SERVICES INC. Phone: 763-479-5172 Fax: 763ampion 242 E—Mail: mcampionC�campioneng.com I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report has been prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN MN r PRELIMINARY STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PROJECT NO: 13-050 N0. DATE BY DESCRIPTION SHEET N 0 . 5 0 E 6 SHEETS DAT01/03/2014 REVISIONS Martin P. Campion —Lic. # 19901 Date: Plant Schedule Plant Schedule KEY QTY. COMMON: BOTANICAL NAME SIZE TYPE COMMENTS RS 4 RED SUNSET MAPLE; ACER RUBRUM 2 1 /2 BB FIRST BRANCHING AT 6'; 'FRANKSRED' STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER SG 2 SIENNA GLEN MAPLE; ACER X FREMANII 2 1/2 BB FIRST BRANCHING AT 6'; 'SIENNA' STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER RO 2 RED OAK; QUERCUS RUBRA 2 1 /2 BB FIRST BRANCHING AT 6'; STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER SO 2 SWAMP WHITE OAK; QUERCUS BICOLOR 2 1 /2 BB FIRST BRANCHING AT 6'; STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER HB 2 COMMON HACKBERRY; CELTIS 2 1 /2 BB FIRST BRANCHING AT 6'; OCCIDENTALIS STRAIGHT CENTRAL LEADER AP 3 AUSTRIAN PINE; PINUS NIGRA 8a_01a BB SINGLE LEADER; FULL FORM TO GROUND BLACK HILLS SPRUCE; PICEA GLAUCA 8 BB SINGLE LEADER; FULL FORM BH 3 DENSATA —0 I I TO GROUND Planting Details PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. LEAVE LEADERS INTACT. PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. LEAVE LEADERS INTACT. GUYING AND STAKING IS MANDATORY FOR GUYING AND STAKING IS MANDATORY FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND 6 ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: Q CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND i1„ `ate TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. ° BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW ° BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW ° GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE a GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 4 W. ° 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED 2'X2' STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED p8e STEEL DEUNEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 E'. of ee v a STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3� �oBDm POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND B �.1 , "� 6e POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND �,.. OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE OUTSIDE ROOT BALL SECURE TREE g e a @a. TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG 0'�� b TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG o;. POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, Po , a '" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, _x 40 MIL., 1 1¢" WIDE STRAP. a 6� a e N 40 MIL., 1 14" WIDE STRAP. PLACE 4' DEPTH OF SPECIFIED MULCH OVER PLANT PITS — DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDUNE WITH FINISHED SITE WHERE WRAPPING IS CALLED FOR: WRAP FROM GROUNDUNE UPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES. PLACE 4" DEPTH OF SPECIFIED MULCH OVER PLANT PITS — DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACKFILL PLANT PR WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING GRADE. TREES NATURAL GROUNDUNE WITH FINISHED Planting Notes SITE GRADE. 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER "ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 or 800-252-1166) TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA—GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2004 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER STANDARD ANSI PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL —IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED k BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED k BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS, 12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY — PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING. 13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH —BARKED TREES — FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14. STAKING OF TREES OPTIONAL; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16. BACKFILL SOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BARROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. CONSTRUCTION COMPACTED SOIL TO BE RIPPED TO A DEPTH OF 12" (2 DIRECTIONS)WITHIN A 10' RADIOUS AROOUND PLANTED TREE. 17. ALL SHRUB PLANTING BEDS (WITHIN SODDED AREAS) SHALL HAVE WEED BARRIER FABRIC, 4" OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH AND VALLEY —VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING. THE EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND AT LEAST 3' FROM THE CENTERS OF EVERGREEN TREES. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18. FOUR INCHES OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH SHALL BE USED AROUND ALL TREES WITHIN TURF AREAS. 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINE"SOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX. ALL SOD AREAS SHALL BE PREPARED WITH 4" OF TOPSOIL AND RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 21. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 22. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. II NO. I DATE I BY I DESCRIPTION I REVISIONS O- Dan Sjordal, ASLA -. - Landscape Archileclore Park Planning _ Urban Design VisaaliMion 445 Oreson Avenue Nntl6, Golden Valley MN 55427 613-360-5757 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report has been prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Professional Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 01/24/2014 Dan Sjordal —Lic. # 22321 Date: FRETHAM 19TH ADDITION LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT CHANHASSEN, MN s 0 30 60 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET PROJECT NO: PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 13-050 SHEET NO. 6 OF 6 SHEETS DAT01/03/2014