The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-12_2017-12 REZ, SPR, SUB, VAC, & VAR FOR TOWNHOMES(reserved for recording) CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City") hereby represents and certifies to PULTE HOMES OF M]NNESOTA LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Successor Developer"), with the intention that said parties may rely hereon, that the City has reviewed the obligations set forth in that certain Development Contract by and between the City and Chanhassen Gateway Place, LLC, dated April 10, 2006, and recorded October 10, 2006 as Carver County Document No. A451284 (the "Contract") as it relates to the property legally described in Exhibit A ("Property"). That at the request of the Successor Developer, and pursuant to Exhibit "B", General Conditions, Paragraph 23 H. of the Contract, said obligations of the "Developer" related to the Property, as defined in the Contract, have been performed to date, have been completed and satisfied, all warranties have expired, and that any sums due and owing under the Contract by the Developer to date have been collected and paid in full. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Certificate of Compliance to be executed this 1_ day of M&Y 12018. CITY OF CHANRASSEN By odd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Aeday of 2018, by Todd Gerhardt, the City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minn ota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. No Public KIM T. MEUWI3SEN NoMry PubgoMhMeeola WyC Mmtlmw som Jai 31.➢m DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KhvnON, Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 RNK EXHIBIT A Outlot G, West Park, Carver County, Minnesota. And All that part of the public highway as dedicated on the plat of Gateway North, recorded as Document No. 451279, Carver County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 2, Block 2, said plat. rA ASSESSMENT SEARCH ORDER NO.: 11040-21224E Requested By: DEREK r� Company: I CST Stewart Title , Email l'_-� House ARC -- tnc nmru+.amcs ASSESSMENT: RECHECK. DATE: I I I Notes: - Status: Complete Status: UPDATE ' If HOLD, reason for hold: If HOLD, reason for hold: # Assmt PIDS; # Recheck PIDs: Zone: 1 Completed: T/7/2018 PROPERTYINFORMATION PID No.: 25,7850710 County CARVER State Additional Fee Street: XXXX XXXX City: CHANHASSEN Zip: Legal Description Parcel 1 Outlot G, West Park, Carver County, Minnesota. Parcel 2 All that part of the public highway as dedicated on the plat ' of Gateway North, recorded as Document No. 451279, Carver County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 2, Block 2, said plat LEVIED ASSESSMENTS Type of Improvement: Original Amt Balance Payable: Certified To 20 Good Til: NONE � --- ----- -------- PENDING ASSESSMENTS Type of Improvement Estimated Amount: NOTES: NONE Completed by: Epic Property Staff Epic Property Services, Inc. " 12550 West Frontage Road •• Suite 205 •' Burnsville, MN 55337 •• 952-666-7410 Document No. A662281 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Recorded on -May 21, 2018 12:13 PM Fee:$46.00 I I II I2281 III I CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN AGREEMENT 2017-12 WEST PARK (Phase H - South Parcel) SPECIAL PROVISIONS Kaaren Lewis County Recorder THIS AGREEMENT ("Site Plan Agreement") dated July 24, 2017, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company (the "Developer"). This agreement will govem land described in Exhibit A. 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for construction of 82 townhouses (West Park) (64 north of Lake Susan Drive and 18 south of Lake Susan Drive), Planning Case 2017-12 (referred to in this Site Plan Agreement as the "Project'). The land is legally described in the attached Exhibit A. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enters into this Site Plan Agreement and furnishes the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: PlanA: (1 of 23) Title Sheet dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. PlanB: (2 of 23) Detail Sheet dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. PlanC: (3 of 23) Detail Sheet dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. PlanD: (I of 2) Existing Conditions Survey dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering Plan E: (2 of 2) Existing Conditions Survey dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering PlanF: (6 of 23) Site Plan (North Parcel) dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering SP-1 SCANNED PlanG: (7 of 23) Grading and Drainage Plan (Overall) dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. PlanH: (8 of 23) Grading and Drainage Plan (North Parcel) dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Plan I: (9 of 23) Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (Overall) dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. Plan J: (10 of 23) Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (North Parcel) dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. Plan K: (11 of 23) Erosion and Sediment Control Notes and Details dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. PlanL: (12 of 23) Sanitary Sewer and Watennain Plan dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. PlanM: (13 of 23) Sanitary Sewer Forcemain Plan and Profiles dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. PlanN: (14 of 23) Sanitary Sewer Forcemain Plan and Profiles Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. Plan O: (15 of 23) Storm Sewer Plan dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. Plan P: (16 of 23) Street Plan and Profiles dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. Plan Q: (17 of 23) Street Plan and Profiles Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. Plan R: (18 of 23) Street Intersection Details dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. Plan S: (19 of 23) Tree Canopy Coverage Plan dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. Plan T: (20 of 23) Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan (North Parcel) dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. Plan U: (21 of 23) Landscape and Reforestation Plan (North Parcel) dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. PlanV: (22 of 23) Landscape Schedule, Notes and Details dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. PlanW: (23 of 23) Landscape Details dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. SP-2 PlanX: (1 of 2) Final Plat Cover Sheet dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. PlanY: (2 of 2) Final Plat dated Received June 20, 2017, prepared by Alliant Engineering. PlanZ: (ELI, 2, & 3) Building Control Plans dated October 7, 2016, prepared by Pulte Homes Minnesota Division. Plan AA: Color Palette and material sample. PlanBB: (LI) Town homes Landscape Plans dated May 15, 2017, prepared by Aaron Hanson. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by July 31, 2019. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If anexten- sion is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Site Plan Agreement, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") in the amount of $ 39,444.13. This amount has been calculated at a rate of 110% of the actual value of improvement and will be included in the security required by the Development Contract. The City will release the security posted in accordance with the City Code. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Chad Onsgard Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC 7500 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite 670 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952-229-0723 e-mail: Chad.Ons ag_rd@PulteGroup.com Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Otber Special Conditions. On July 10, 2017, the City Council adopted the following motion: "The City Council approves Site Plan with a variance for the construction of 82 Townhouses as shown in plans dated received June 30, 2017 — Planning Case 17-12 - subject to the following conditions: M93 Engineering 1. The applicant shall submit the full SWPPP document to the city for review prior to grading on site. 2. No parking signage shall be installed at all turnarounds to keep them open for public safety access. 3. All private street signage shall comply with the MN Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 4. The sidewalk and pedestrian ramps shall be constructed per the Chanhassen Standard Detail Plates. 5. All sidewalks internal to the site shall be owned and maintained by the HOA. 6. The sidewalk connection parallel to Lake Susan Drive shall be owned and maintained by the city. 7. The HOA shall be responsible for snow maintenance on sidewalks adjacent to HOA property. 8. The applicant shall revise plans to call out the size of proposed water main. 9. The applicant's engineer shall add a column to the stormwater pipe/structure table to list the velocities of the pipes. 10. Stormwater pipe within the development shall be privately owned and maintained. 11. The storm sewer/water main crossing near CB MH 702 may be in conflict. The applicant's engineer shall verify this when the utility profiles are drafted. 12. The applicant shall meet the minimum requirements for stormwater set forth in City Code §9-VII and requirements of the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District. 13. The applicant must obtain a permit from RPBCWD prior to grading the site. 14. The applicant is responsible for obtaining permits from applicable regulatory agencies (MDH, MPCA, MnDOT, etc.) prior to construction. 15. The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). 16. Sidewalk constructed within MnDOT right-of-way may require an Limited Use Permit (LUP). 17. The plan for flared stormwater pipes that discharge into the pond, infiltration basin and right-of-way shall be modified to have non -erosive velocities (3.5-5.0 feet per second). SP-4 18. The pipe from FES 500 to OCS 501 shall be modified to have a slope of 1.00% or greater to prevent standing water and reduce the potential for ice damage. Buildine 1. Accessibility must be provided to all portions of the development and a percentage of the units may also be required to be accessible or adaptable in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. Further information is needed to determine these requirements. 2. Buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system. For the purposes of this requirement property lines do not constitute separate buildings. 3. The buildings will be required to be designed by an architect and engineer as determined by the Building Official. 4. The developer must submit a list of proposed street name(s) to the Fire Marshal and Building Official for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. 5. Demolition permits must be obtained before demolishing any structures on the site. Application for such permits must include hazardous substances investigation and proposed mitigation reports. 6. A final grading plan and geotechnical (soils evaluation) report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits will be issued. 7. Walls and projections within 5 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire -resistive construction. 8. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 9. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 10. The developer and/or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Fire Marshal 1. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. Street signs (temporary allowed) shall be installed prior to building permits being issued. Fire Chief must approve signage. 3. Prior to combustible construction fire hydrants shall be made serviceable. 4. Prior to combustible home construction fire apparatus access roads capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus shall be made serviceable. ;3Z, 5. Relocate the fire hydrant on Stonegate road eighty (80) feet to the west. (At the intersection of Stonegate and Stonegate) 6. On Eagle View Road add a fire hydrant between block 5 and block 6. 7. In order to avoid duplicating street names, submit new proposed street names to Fire Chief and Building Official for review and approval. Plannine 1. Approval of this site plan is contingent upon approval of the final plat for Gateway North. 2. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement. 3. The building shall comply with the Planned Unit Development building setback requirements" 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Site Plan Agreement are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. (SEAL) WIN STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 14 day of �_, 2018, by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. �tNl Pl,� NOTARY PUBLIC ANN P;3;12020 R Notary Public-Minn14JENNIFER py t.'wmraow Et4Maa Jan . 0 DEVELOPER: PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLC: BY: Eric Pad ice Presi ent of Land STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF New N eri m The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 3 day of r iWy , 2018, by Eric Padget, Vice President of Land of Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, a Limited Liability Company, on behalf of the company. CA" !". JENNIFER LYNNE MUJWID-HERRMANN �`9Notary Public MyC rnissionExpires NO PUBLIC _� Jan31,2021 DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 SP-7 SITE PLAN AGREEMENT EXIMIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEGAL DESCRUMON OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: South Parcel Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block, 1; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block, 2; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Block, 3; Outlot A and Outlot B; All in West Park Second Addition, Carver County, Minnesota. CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN AGREEMENT F—KH[Bff "B" GENERAL CONDPI'IONS 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) Site Plan Agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, 3) the Site Plan Agreement has been recorded with the County Recorder's and Registrar of Titles' Offices of the County where the project is located, and 4) the City Planner has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plans I, J, and K, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowing materials, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plans U, V, and W, shall be wan -anted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The City shall retain $3,585.83 of the posted security for landscaping for twelve (12) months following planting to secure the warranties. Provided the landscaping is in the condition required herein following such twelve (12) month period, the City shall release the remaining security to Developer within ten (10) business days of request therefore. 10431 Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses, which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attomeys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Site Plan Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on -site construction trailers and temporaryjob site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Site Plan Agreement. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. GC-2 to, G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Site Plan Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Site Plan Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recwrdine. This Site Plan Agreement shall nm with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. I Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this Site Plan Agreement shall be from 7:00 a.m to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Repplations. In the development of the property pursuant to this Site Plan Agreement, the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities to the extent any of the same have jurisdiction over the property s development: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Site Plan Agreement. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. GC-3 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Commu fifty for Life- Providing forToday and Planning forTomorrow MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Todd Hoffman, Park Director Don Johnson, Fire Chief (acting Fire Marshall) Jerry Mohn, Building Official Jill Sinclair, Forrester Stephanie Smith, Engineer FROM: Jenny Potter DATE: June 22, 2017 1 SUBJ: West Park Plan Changes Please review the revised West Park plans for changes in grading, property lines and landscaping and return any comments to Sharmeen AI-Jaffby June 28, 2017. PH 952.227.1100 • www.d.chanhassen.mn.us • FX952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227.1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 * CITY OFCHANHASSEN AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline Agency Review Request Date: Agency Review Response Deadline: Date Application Filed: May 23, 2017 June 8, 2017 May 19 2017 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Sharmeen AI-Jaff 952-227-1134 saljaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Senior Planner Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60-Day Review Period Deadline: June 20, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. July 10, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. July 18, 2017 Application: To consider a Rezoning, Site Plan Review, Subdivision, and Vacation of Right of Way with Variances on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Single Family Residential (RSF) for construction of an 82 unit town -home development and located southeast of Waters Edge Drive, west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Highway 212 and bisected by Lake Susan Drive. A ItcanPa t: Pulte Homes. Owner: Brian Klin elhutz. PlanningCase: 2017-12 Web e: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2017-12 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: ❑ Attorney ® Building Official ® Engineer ® Fire Marshal ® Forester ® Park Director ® Water Resources ❑ Law Enforcement Carver County Agencies: ❑ Community Development ® Engineer ❑ Environmental Services ❑ Historical Society ❑ Parks ® Sal & Water Conservation District State Agencies: ❑ Board of Water & Soil Resources ❑ Health ❑ Historical Society ❑ Natural Resources -Forestry ® Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control 0 Transportation Federal Agencies: ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ US Fish & Wildlife Watershed Districts: ❑ Carver County WMO ❑ Lower MN River ❑ Minnehaha Creek ® Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Utilities: ® Cable TV—Mediacom ® Electric — Minnesota Valley ® Electric —Xcel Energy ❑ Magellan Pipeline ® Natural Gas — CenterPointEnergy ® Phone — CenturyLink Adlacent Cities: ❑ Chaska ❑ Eden Prairie ❑ Jackson Township ❑ Minnetonka ❑ Shorewood ❑ Victoria Adlacent Counties: ❑ Hennepin ❑ Scott School Districts: ® Eastern Carver County 112 ❑ Minnetonka 276 Other Agencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority ❑ MN Landscape Arboretum ® SouthWest Transit ❑ TC&W Railroad tet. Energy May 26, 2017 Sharmeen AI-Jaff City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-227-1134 saliaff(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us 700 West Linden Avenue PO Box 1165 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1165 RE: Planning Case: 2017-12, Site Plans @ www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2017-12 Rezoning, Site Plan Review, Subdivision, and Vacation of Right of Way with Variances on property zoned Planned Unit Development and Single Family Residential for Construction of an 82 unit town -home development. Dear Ms. AI-Jaff: CenterPoint Energy has no objection or issues related to the above Planning Case: 2017-12. Thank you for the advance notice. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 612-321-5381. Respectfully, CENTERPOINT ENERGY Chuck Mayers, SRWA Right of Way Agent III chade.mayers@centerPointenergy.com PC: William F. Kallberg, C&M Supervisor, CenterPoint Energy Alan L. Jongerius, C&M Advance Foreperson, CenterPoint Energy Eric Yang, Area Engineer, CenterPoint Energy Andrew Balgobin, Administration Engineer, CenterPoint Energy CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Community for Life- ProvidingforToday and Planning for Tomorrow MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmeen A]-Jaff, Senior Planner FROM: Todd Hoffinan, Park & Recreation Director DATE: June 7, 2017 SUBJ: West Park, Pulte Homes: Recommendation Concerning Park & Trail Conditions of Approval PARKS This property is conveniently located within the %-mile neighborhood park service area for Chanhassen Hills Park. Residents of the West Park community will have convenient access to this publicly -maintained recreation facility. Chanhassen Hills Park is 8-acres in size and features a playground, basketball court, picnic shelter, ballfield, benches, and walking trails. Off-street parking is also available on Chanhassen Hills Drive South Bandimere Community Park and Lake Susan Community Park are both located within the 1-mile community park service of the new West Park residential subdivision. These two parks are more robust in their recreation facility offerings, including features such as diamond ballfields, a fishing pier, boat landing, tennis courts, hockey rink, soccer/lacrosse fields, disc golf course, and extensive walking trails. No additional parkland acquisition is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. TRAILS The subject site has direct access to public trails located adjacent to Waters Edge Drive and Lake Susan Drive and convenient access to trails along Great Plains Boulevard. Sidewalks and trails connecting the interior spaces and all residential units to the adjacent public trail system should be planned for with the development. No additional trail construction is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. PARK AND TRAIL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for the West Park Residential Subdivision. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per multi-family/apartment dwelling, the total park fees will be $311,600 (82 units x $3,800 each). PH952.227.1100 • www.d.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227. 1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CITY OF CHANHAS3EN Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline Agency Review Request Date: May 23, 2017 Agency Review Response Deadline: June 8, 2017 Date Application Filed: May 19, 2017 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Sharmeen AI-Jaff 952-227-1134 sa4aff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Senior Planner Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60-Day Review Period Deadline: June 20, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. July 10, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. July 18, 2017 Application: To consider a Rezoning, Site Plan Review, Subdivision, and Vacation of Right of Way with Variances on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Single Family Residential (RSF) for construction of an 82 unit town -home development and located southeast of Waters Edge Drive, west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Highway 212 and bisected by Lake Susan Drive. A licant: Pulte Homes. Owner: Brian Klin elhutz. Plannin Case: 2017-12 Web Page: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us12017-12 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: Lj Attorney ® Building Official ® Engineer ® Fire Marshal ® Forester ® Park Director ® Water Resources ❑ Law Enforcement Federal Agencies: ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ US Fish & Wildlife Watershed Districts: ❑ Carver County WMO ❑ Lower MN River ❑ Minnehaha Creek ® Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Carver County Agencies: Utilities: Adjacent Cities: ❑ Chaska ❑ Eden Prairie ❑ Jackson Township ❑ Minnetonka ❑ Shorewood ❑ Victoria Adjacent Counties: ❑ Hennepin ❑ Scott ❑ ® Community Development Engineer ® Cable TV — Mediacom School Districts: ❑ Environmental Services ® ® Electric— Minnesota Valley Electric — Xcel Energy ® Eastern Carver County 112 ❑ Historical Society ❑ Magellan Pipeline ❑ Minnetonka 276 ❑ ® Parks Soil & Water Conservation District ® Natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy ® Phone — CenturyLink Other Agencies: State Agencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad ❑ Board of Water & Soil Resources ❑ Authority MN Landscape Arboretum ❑ Health ® SouthWest Transit ❑ Historical Society ❑ TC&W Railroad ❑ Natural Resources -Forestry ® Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control 0 Transportation CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO.2017-12 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June, 20, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a Rezoning, Site Plan Review, Subdivision, and Vacation of Right of Way with Variances on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Single Family Residential (RSF) for construction of an 82 unit town -home development and located southeast of Waters Edge Drive, west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Highway 212 and bisected by Lake Susan Drive. Applicant: Pulte Homes. Owner: Brian Klingelhutz. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the city's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2017-12 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen A]-Jaff,Senior Planner Email: saliaff(a.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1134 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on June 8, 2017) Property Card Parcel ID Number 252930030 Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name BRIAN A & LOU ANN D KLINGELHUTZ NECON PROPERTIES LLC Mailing Address 8860 KLEIN DR WACONIA, MN 55387-4566 Property Address Address 781 LAKE SUSAN DR City CHANHASSEN, MIN 55317 Lake Susan Or Awf'Y�!� .jIlk Parcel Information Uses Res V Land GIS Acres 2.04 Net Acres Deeded Acres Plat GATEWAY NORTH Lot 002 Block 002 Tax Description f x � Building Information Building Style Above rade Bedrooms Finished S Ft Year Built Garage Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve 0112 1 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF N I N I N Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2016 Values (Payable 2017) 2017 Values (Payable 2018) Last Sale Land $388,800.00 $435,500.00 Date of Sale 7/2/2013 Building $0.00 $0.00 Sale Value $305,000.00 Total $388,800.00 $435,500.00 The data provided herewith is for reference purposes only. The; data is not suitable for legal, engineering, surveying or cirs, 6milar purposes. Carver County does not guamraee the accuracy of the iiformatim contained herein. This data is furnished on an as 6bass and Carver County makes no representations or i ananties, earner expressed or implied, for the mennhantabllity, or fitness of the information provided for my purpose. This diactaimar is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03 and the user of the data provided herein admowledges that Carver County shall not be liable for any damagesand by using mile data in anyway expressly wawes all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hcltl harmless Carver County, Rs officials, officers, agents, employeesetc. from any and all claims brought by anyone stio uses the infor radon provided for herein. Bs employees or agents, or ,it parbas iktnd , arise cut of useYs across. By acceptance of this dale, the user agrees not to a d aimil Mis data or provide a a to it a any part of it to another party unless the user includes wim the data a copy of this disclaimer. Thursday, May 25, 2017 Carver County, MN Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 with Rosemount, Inc., a Subsidiary of Emerson Electric Company; and authorizes the application for funds available through the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, Minnesota Investment Fund and Job Creation Fund programs. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Harstad, best of luck to you. We look forward to seeing your continued partnership with the City of Chanhassen. And by the way you do a good job of supporting our activities here in Chanhassen as well and it's good to see your name. Emerson or Rosemount, either one so. Brian Harstad: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much. Thank you Ms. Petersen. Is that resolution available for me to sign or will I do that tomorrow? Chelsea Petersen: We'll have that for you tomorrow. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, thank you. WEST PARK: A. APPROVE REZONING FROM RSF AND PUD TO PUD-RESIDENTIAL, PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND A VARIANCE FOR AN 82 UNIT TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT AND APPROVE SUMMARY ORDINANCE. B. PUBLIC HEARING: VACATION OF PUBLIC DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT. Mayor Laufenburger: Staff report please. Is this your's Ms. Aanenson? Alright thank you. Before you begin that, there's some people standing. You're certainly welcome to come in. There's some chairs over here if you'd like to come in and, I give you permission to walk in front of others while you're doing that. Thank you very much. Ms. Aanenson. Kate Aanenson: Thank you. Thank you Mayor, members of the City Council. This request is West Park. It went before the Planning Commission on June 20'b and the applicant is Pulte Homes. Paul Heuer is here with his engineer and then owner Brian Klingelhutz and, I did see Brian in the back of the room so. The request is actually a number of, to make this project happen there's a number of requests involved. A rezoning and a PUD ordinance. Site plan review. A subdivision. A variance setback and vacation of drainage and utility easements. So when this item went to the Planning Commission and the public hearing was held some of the members of the public raised concerns regarding the setback of the PUD and then also the amount of density. So the staff is kind of going to go back and tell a little bit more of the story of how we got to this project in and of itself. I know the applicant did have a neighborhood Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 meeting and maybe not all the questions were answered but we'll spend a little bit more time reviewing how we got to this project today. So again the subject site is on, off of Great Plains Boulevard, Waters Edge and just south of the Lake Susan Drive extension. So in looking at this property back in 2008 when all this area was in flux, let me just, so a little bit more about the conditions excuse me. The barn is on the property. The Klingelhutz family farm and then we also have the Gateway apartment building there. So this goes back to when we in 2008 when all this property was in flux and looking at the land use in the area, there was concern about the rapid change with 212 coming through. People on Lake Susan Drive concerned about traffic potentially going down their street. What would happen with the Kwik Trip and the park and ride, how would that impact the area so we worked with a consultant and we went through all the specific properties and identified some land uses. In looking at the property one of the issues that was raised by the Klingelhutz family was the concern regarding this medium density. As you recall we recently approved that for the Mission Hills Assisted Living Senior Housing project. When we looked at this entire area one of the recommendations was the underlying family, the Klingelhutz family wanted to keep that commercial. They really felt strongly about that but when 212 came through the actual commercial moved south where the Kwik Trip is today. So they were reluctant to have that. One of the discussions we had was talking about some potential higher density there so we were pleased that we found a good transition between the Mission Hills and the senior housing. But that left this other piece that the Klingelhutz family owned that had 3 different zoning on it. So over the years with that land use mix we met with a lot of different developers and that's the story we probably didn't clearly state at the Planning Commission and some of the projects, while they met the intent we felt didn't meet, based on those meetings we had in 2008 what we heard from the neighborhood. So if you look at this project there's a lot of driveways along the perimeter and coming out on Waters Edge so those were twin homes but they also had a lot of driveways so we looked at also had 93 units so we felt like this did not meet the goal. While it spread the density out it also created a lot more traffic patterns along Waters Edge Drive. So this property again is butted between a state highway 101 and then the Waters Edge Drive which is a dead end cul-de-sac. One of the other projects we looked at again the family looking at trying to stay with the senior housing. Maybe the same developer moving across the street or other people also interested in senior housing so we had a proposal for a senior housing unit at that time trying to save the barn and using that for a recreation facility and there was a lot of talk with the City. Whether or not the City wanted it. The parks and rec department that didn't want to use it as that. We were concerned about if the, who would operate it. The senior coop, would they be the operator. How would it run? How would it fit into the neighborhood and so the staff felt again that this didn't meet it again with the additional 70 parking stalls. So our goal again going back to looking at what we believe was the intent of the neighborhood meetings that we had back so one of the goals when we started working with Pulte on this project was looking at how this project fit into the surrounding neighborhood. This is in the shoreland district so there is height and open space requirements when you do a PUD in the shoreland district so that was some of the impediments as you recall. It also affected the senior housing project across the street where we had to meet the height requirements there so it was a really challenging piece and I know the Klingelhutz family have worked on this for a number of years to try to get the right project to land on this site. So W, Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 working with Pulte Homes and what we felt a project that met the goals. Not putting all the density on the higher end. Averaging that density out to less than the medium density height or density requirements. We felt that this met what we heard from the neighborhood at the time so all the driveways or the garages are internal so there's no driveways going out except for the access points. You have a homeowners association. It's overall balanced. Again the density's not pushed into one area and then also they picked up the southern piece so it's all a nice PUD. All included instead of leaving a remnant piece to come back later so in the staff's opinion we thought this was the best proposal we had seen over the last few years and that is why we worked hard. Sharmeen Al-Jaff on our staff worked hard with Pulte Homes to get a good project and pushed them on their architecture and the like and we're pleased with the way the project has turned out. So again the access coming off of Great Plains Boulevard or 101 would be off of Lake Susan Drive. Two points coming in and we worked with the Gateway Apartments to use that existing access to come in so it's a nice T intersection there for great visibility and then just one access point then off of the Waters Edge Drive, again limiting the traffic there on that road. Especially with garage and a lot of people backing out so it gives you that controlled intersection so we thought was a good response to the concerns that we had. There was guest parking. Is guest parking provided in the site? Some of the concerns that the Planning Commission had. Was there enough guest parking and how would that be accommodated? Again the driveways are deep enough that we believe with the guest parking out there that it should be sufficient. The other thing as I mentioned working with the architectural standards, because this is a PUD we're setting up PUD standards and those are a part of what you'll be approving tonight in the PUD ordinance itself. As a part of that there's colors, materials. I have material boards here but this drawing illustratively shows the materials being presented. In addition there is, there'll be windows in the garages. Again we think that's another nice element of making it aesthetically pleasing. This is a view from the back. This would be on Waters Edge Drive looking in so this would be the street coming in. So the PUD itself, we had put the buffer in there. When you're against low density to low density, or medium to low density we believed and working with Pulte and the products that they had seen as the, they introduced this product into Plymouth. People want the additional sun room, that we felt that the variance into that setback. Again a PUD is you can set that setback as you want it but the way our ordinance is written it would require the variance and we support it based on the way the product lays out. The fact that they have the internal street connections and all the garages on that inside so this would be the most aesthetic side of the building for the neighbors to look at. Again heavily landscaped. Again one of the positives things that we liked about this project is combining all the parcels together. Is that there'll be a nice HOA. They put a nice amenity package in there which is under the PUD ordinance. Not every ordinance requires this but the public gathering space for the association itself so that's shown here in the fire pits. The decorative street lighting and the landscaping itself. Again trying to match the entrance that we've got on the other comers of the 101 and 212. So one of your actions then tonight is approving the preliminary plat and the number of lots. The private streets and the parking. That's all part of that. There's also a vacation with this project so the lot itself, there's 9.8 acres. 82 lots and 8 outlots. The 82 lots will be townhouses. Outlots A and D are private streets and B, C, E and F are also open space or finding that space for the stormwater. One of the questions that came up at the neighborhood meeting was regarding the 10 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 parks so in this situation because they're within the Park and Rec Director reviewing this with the park commission said that in the circumstance they didn't want additional park property. That they would take the park and trail fees and no additional trails or parks because they're within that 1 mile radius. I think there was some concerns from the neighbors raised that maybe the park, existing parks were crowded but we're going by what the recommendation from the park commission and the park director. So the easement vacation. We've included both the motions in this but the easement vacation, this does require a public hearing so. Mayor Laufenburger: Ms. Aanenson let me just stop you there. Kate Aanenson: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Just from a procedural standpoint we'll deal with the vacation in a separate motion because that requires a public hearing. Are you okay with that? Kate Aanenson: Yes I've got them all in one motion. I guess we've done this before where we would just open the public hearing for that specific item to talk about the vacation. Mayor Laufenburger: You're okay with that? Kate Aanenson: Yeah that's how we've got that, if that's alright with you. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh okay. Okay. Kate Aanenson: We've got it in one motion. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. We can do that. Yeah we can do that. Kate Aanenson: The reason being is you'd have to, in order to approve the plat you'd have to do the vacation first so I think it's for us I guess to explain to you it's kind of putting it all together. I'll break it out separately where the public hearing would be. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright let me just check something. Kate Aanenson: Yep. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Knutson is it acceptable for us to have all 5 elements of the motion in a single motion following the public hearing for the vacation of utilities? Roger Knutson: Yes it is Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you. That's all I needed. Alright Ms. Aanenson, continue. Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 Kate Aanenson: Thank you. So there are easements there. As you recall when 212 got built and 101 there's additional easements there. Right now for the vacation of the old 101 which kind of runs behind, you can see back here. That takes a number of years to get vacated so what we're vacating right now is some existing easements and West Park 2nd Addition and then they'll dedicate new easements so the easement, the public hearing then is for the vacation of the easements. There's no public hearings required for the rest of it. Those public hearings were held at the Planning Commission regarding the variance and the like so that's the vacation and then there'll be platting new easements. So again this is how it would look with the new easements. We talked about that for the streets. The open space. The stormwater and the like. There'll be private streets internally. So with that the two drainage easements are at the end but at this point mayor I would suggest that you would open then the public hearing to talk about, if anybody has comments on the drainage easements. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Before we do that are there any questions from the council to the staff regarding the vacation of the utilities? Okay, then at this time I would like to open the public hearing specifically on the item, could you raise that up? Go to your second page. The motion. Kate Aanenson: Oh sure. This right here. It's these two correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so it's the bottom two. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger. Right so at this time I'd like to open a public hearing specifically on the vacation of public utility easements in the developer known as West Park. If there's anybody present in the council chambers that would like to speak regarding that, now would be a good time to address the council. Alright there being none I will close the public hearing on the vacation of the utilities. Okay. Now let's bring this back to council. Council do you have any questions on the project as presented by Ms. Aanenson? Councilmember Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: Yes please Mayor. Just a couple clarifications just because it went, you went quickly and I know it was a lengthier conversation at the Planning Commission but in terms of the setback, the variance is 25 feet. Normally it should be 50 feet? And can you just explain is it that there, is it the sunroom addition? Is it the orientation of the townhomes? What is the need? Kate Aanenson: Sure and maybe I can let the applicant from Pulte Homes go through that in a little bit more detail if that's okay. Councilwoman Ryan: Absolutely. 12 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 Mayor Laufenburger: Actually that might be a good idea. Let's, if you wouldn't mind let's hear from the applicant and perhaps some of the questions that councilmembers have you could address them. State your name please for the record. Paul Heuer: Good evening. My name is Paul Heuer with Pulte Homes, 7500 Office Ridge Circle, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344. Mayor Laufenburger: We have office space available in Chanhassen too Mr. Heuer. Paul Heuer: We just leased a new spot, sorry about that. Mayor Laufenburger: Nice to have you here Paul. Tell us a little bit about your project. Paul Heuer: Thank you. Pulte Homes is a fairly large builder. We build about 500 homes a year. We're really well known for our floorplans. We actually build entire homes and rooms in warehouses across the country and we pay people to go through them and get their comments so through that process over a couple decades we've gotten to have really good floorplans with innovations that we hear people like. In our vision for this particular new neighborhood is to have something near your local conveniences. In this case it would be the retail across the freeway. The transit station. The park just to the southwest of the site. Good trail system that's very beautiful and also of course great school districts so what our vision was is to have something that would be medium density. That would be very fitting for up against 212, 101 and an apartment complex yet still have a sense of place and that was behind our efforts of creating a fire pit. A gathering area. Private trails that lead to the public trails around the perimeter of the site so that's really our vision. There obviously are some constraints due to the shoreland district and the density issues so I'd like to compliment both your engineering and planning staff. From the beginning this was a very, very tricky property to figure out the best way to deal with all of the height, impervious surface issues, density issues, and kind of thread the needle and through the efforts of staff we feel we've been able to do that with this particular proposal. The question. The question's escaping me. Setbacks. Setbacks. There's a long story here, I'll try to keep it short. Often times the origin of front setbacks is really related to the length of a driveway and being able to have cars parked in the driveway. Sometimes there are sidewalks in which case there's a little bit more setback to make sure the cars fit in the driveway without blocking the sidewalk. I know in modern day we've seen a lot of cities go down to 25 foot front setbacks. In fact I think Fox Hollow recently was a 25 foot front setback so it's pretty common and very workable. In this particular case we did work real hard to keep this neighborhood looking good. It's very important to us not only to have floorplans that people really like to live in but to have a community that looks fantastic and if you drive around the Twin Cities and look at a number of our communities I think you'll see that so in this particular case our goal was to show our best side outward and to keep the activity inward. When cars are coming and going there's a lot of activity so for the folks who are living on Waters Edge Drive, if we had all the driveways on Waters Edge Drive there'd be kind of a buzz of activity there all the time so our goal was to move that activity internal which makes it also feel more like a community since it's all 13 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 somewhat enclosed, but it also looks better from the outside. When you're driving along 101 or Lake Susan Drive you'll see the best side of our homes. You'll see open space. You'll see that we worked very hard to have the orientations of the buildings different. One of the things I hate when I drive certain communities is I see barracks. It looks like Army barracks where you have these row homes all lined up together. Same colors. Same architecture. So I think what you'll find in this particular example of a new neighborhood and product is we have different architecture on each of the buildings. We'll have at least 25 different color packages so they'll all look different and the outsides, the most visible and beautiful part of our buildings will be displayed to the exterior and the beehive of activity really occurs internally. So 25 foot seemed appropriate in this case. It may surprise you to know that the apartment building on Lake Susan Drive also is 25 feet from the right-of-way and it doesn't feel bad and that's a tall building. These are relatively flat, two story row homes with 25 foot setbacks similar to Fox Hollow. Similar to the apartment complex. It really just fit. Councilwoman Ryan: And I appreciate the explanation. Being a builder of single family homes I'm sure you can also recognize that people that have their homes and looking out at a field is now going to be changed to townhomes, as beautiful as they are and so the concern was okay, are the homes going to be right on the road? Is it going to feel crunched for lack of better word if it's the 25 foot setback? What kind of landscaping and buffering? Are you going to pay particular attention to that? Paul Heuer: It's a great point. For better or worst our company is focused on doing a lot of infill developments. It makes our sales folks jobs easier and my job a little harder and they're typically more difficult for of course the residents, for us and for you folks because it's a big change. In this particular case we feel we've done the right things. Perhaps we can show the landscaping plan Kate. I brought it. So when we undertake an infill development we anticipate that there's going to be some difficulties and some discomfort among the residents. There always are so we do make an effort to increase our landscape plan. Orientate the buildings so it's beautiful again on the outside. In this particular case what you're seeing is some trees preserved along here. 7 or 8 trees as I recall and these are all trees that were proposed to be planted along the buffer. The outside of Waters Edge Drive, similarly a lot of trees along here. And pretty strong buffering along here too. This does a couple things. One is we know it makes it softer for the residents to look at. More attractive. It also makes the neighborhood itself, the new neighborhood feel more enclosed and people have an instinctual feel for security. You know sometimes developers put gates around communities as an effort to make it feel secure. You can also do that with landscape. In this case we have a pretty strong buffer on the outside that makes it feel like a secure community. But also we feel this is fairly robust landscaping plan compared to what you otherwise might see. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay, thank you. And one last question if I may Mr. Mayor. The parking I know was, you had touched on it about overflow parking or guest parking. You'll have it in, enough room in the driveway. Is there other areas for, if there are more cars than just 2 or 4? 14 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 Paul Heuer: Yeah a couple things. First of all. Mayor Laufenburger: Nann can you show us the landscape plan right? Paul Heuer: Yes thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: There you go, thank you. Paul Heuer: So a couple points about parking. Each unit will have a 2 car garage and 2 cars in the driveway. This is the first row home product that we've seen in the Twin Cities that you can actually have an option for a third car garage too where it's tandem. It's deeper. It has an option instead of a flex room or some other kind of room. In addition we have found that when people have guests over and it's more than 2 cars in the driveway we really need to have parking lots spaced in various locations so that people again can have adequate parking. From our experience as a certain number of stalls per unit that seems to work. Most cities have a minimum requirement and that minimum requirement is typically about what we do. Sometimes we do a little bit more but we've seen over the decades that this works. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay great, thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: I want to speak just to the setbacks just for a second Mr. Heuer and then I'll come to you Mr. Campion. In the Planning Commission there was discussion about a 25 foot setback but in fact the homes are set back further from Waters Edge Drive so if homes wanted to add an extension to the back, like a sunroom or a patio or something. Just can you speak to that a little bit? Paul Heuer: That's a great point, thank you Mr. Mayor. This is seen as kind of a starter home. We just started building this new product in the city of Plymouth this year and we've been surprised by how many people are willing to pay the extra money for a sunroom option, which is a beautiful room but it's been about half the buyers so we have tried to accommodate as many sunroom options as possible here and what that means is along Waters Edge, whether or not people purchase a sunroom or not the homes may be anywhere from 25 feet at the closest to 32 feet away from the right-of-way line. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay and Ms. Aanenson, this is a variance request to 25 foot setback, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: The variance is through the PLID standards. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: And as the applicant has talked we've done that in other subdivisions. It's not that uncommon. 15 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 Mayor Laufenburger: So what would be a non -variant setback? 30 feet? 50 feet? 100 feet? Kate Aanenson: 50 feet typically. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so in this case the builder is, the applicant is asking to change the variance on Waters Edge or is it on the entire perimeter of the property? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: The entire perimeter of the property at 25 foot setback. Paul Heuer: It's written that way Mr. Mayor. Along 101 we've actually showing the homes 40 feet back. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So you're even further back from that 25 foot setback, okay. Alright. Okay Mr. Campion you had a question. Councilman Campion: Mr. Mayor my question was pretty identical. It was along the setback variance and at the commission meeting there was talk about whether it was going from 50 feet to 25 or 30 to 25 and so I got my answer. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay good. Any other council questions of the applicant? Mr. Heuer, just can you speak a little bit to the timing? We have a north, 64 homes on the north I think and what is it 18 on the south, is that correct? What's the timing of your, give us a plan for your buildout if you could please. Paul Heuer: Our goal is to develop the north property, a portion of it or all of it in 2017 and the south property in 2018. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so you expect with approval you expect to be moving dirt this year. Paul Heuer: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, okay. I just have one last question. Are you familiar with all of the documents included in the staff report and are there any areas in the staff report where you have either dispute or question or are you prepared to agree with everything in the staff report? Paul Heuer: I agree with it. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Perfect. Thank you Mr. Heuer. One more question if I can just, have you built homes in Chanhassen in the past? Has Pulte? 16 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 Paul Heuer: We have. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, can you identify where you have? Paul Heuer: It's before my time. I could point to it on a map but I don't remember the names. And also Pulte and Centex merged in 2009 so Centex and Pulte have both built homes in your city. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Arboretum Village is the one that they did. Mayor Laufenburger: Say that again? Kate Aanenson: Arboretum Village on 5 and 41. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh I live in one of those homes. I've been meaning to talk to you about the windows. Thank you Mr. Heuer. Paul Heuer: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilmember Tjornhom you had a question of staff. Councilwoman Tjomhom: This site is kind of a historical site and so are we doing anything as a city or is there anything being done from the Historical Society to kind of make sure it's marked or that it's? Kate Aanenson: Yep, that's a great question. So it's not the original bam. Those questions have been brought up before. We talked about it way back when we did the 2008 study so Wendy Bjorn from the County Historical Society, we can document those but they're not historically significant but yes it's part of the history of Chanhassen for sure. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay, Kate Aanenson: And structurally they're probably not as sound. The buildings itself but we definitely want to inventory them and put them as part of the history of the city. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay. And then also when it came to the landscaping they meet all the minimum requirements for trees and all of? Kate Aanenson: Yes they do. Yep. Jill Sinclair put a very detailed report in there about the types of overstory's. Again those are the ones that give the best screening and the locations of those so they'd be on each lot and then supplemented with trees and shrubs. 17 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 Councilwoman Tjomhom: And then looking at the plat, I mean I've seen a lot of plats and I'm just really surprised that there isn't a park in that and that was because of park and rec. Kate Aanenson: Correct, that's their decision on that correct. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Okay so. Kate Aanenson: It's in proximity. Again I think that they would say that too, right now there are a lot of different age groups looking for this type of home so it could be younger families as they indicated but also it could be empty nesters too and they have different needs and that's something I believe that the HOA over time will look at too. If they want to convert some garden space there or something like that so that's something that the HOA can look at too. Councilwoman Tjomhom: So in order to access a park they'll have to cross 101? Kate Aanenson: No they can go down Lake Susan Drive too. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Actually they don't even have to go on Lake Susan Drive. There's a park path. If you look at the south property, on the west side of the south property there's a park path that goes straight south and then follows the barrier all the way over to Chanhassen Hills Park. Great dog walking area by the way. Councilwoman Tjomhom: Really? Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Another neighborhood Mayor that you've lived in? Mayor Laufenburger: That was not a Pulte home but I lived there... Kate Aanenson: Institutional knowledge. Mayor Laufenburger: Exactly. Institutional knowledge. Let's see. Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Councilmember Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: To that point about the Chanhassen Hills Park, I think it was brought up in the Planning Commission about the direct, how the funds, the park dedication funds are directed and I believe Mr. Hoffman had suggested Bandimere but somebody in the neighborhood said that it should be directed towards the Chanhassen Hills Park. m Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 Kate Aanenson: Yeah, he was informed of that. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. And is that up for discussion or? Kate Aanenson: Well I think that's something if, that would be something that the Park and Rec Commission would make a decision on if you wanted to give them some direction on that but we did, there was also concern about a swing that was broken so we informed him of that too in making sure that that park can accommodate some of the needs so he was aware of that. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilmember Ryan I think that the, I don't recall what the park dedication fees are but I think it's incumbent upon the Park and Rec Commission to review all developments and the source of funds from those developments and decide the best use of those funds for the entire city so I wouldn't want to encumber the Park and Rec Commission to say a certain amount had to go to a certain park. Councilwoman Ryan: I just would suggest that they take a look at that for this development. Kate Aanenson: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: I'm sure Mr. Hoffman and other members of the Park and Rec Commission may be even present tonight, or not present tonight but will review these Minutes so that they will take that action. Kate Aanenson: I guess the way I read the motion, or the way that they put their input is that there was 2 parks within a mile. Not that one should get money over the other. Just that they were in a service area. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: And the parks are different too. One is, has soccer fields. A hockey rink. Baseball fields. The other one has a baseball field and. Councilwoman Ryan: Well one just recently had a lot of investment in it and I know Chanhassen Hills Park has not had that same investment recently so when we look to the future of rehabilitating a lot of our parks I could see where this would serve that need. Kate Aanenson: We'll pass it on. Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Gerhardt. 19 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council we'll talk with the Park and Rec Director and make sure that the Park and Rec Commission reviews both Bandimere and Chanhassen Hills to look at the needs. Usually get community feedback on what's needed and what's wanted in their neighborhood parks so most recently we did Roundhouse Park and I don't know where Chanhassen Hills sits on you know relooking at the park but we can move it up the list. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Are there any questions of staff regarding this project? Any further comments or motions from the council? Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. McDonald. Councilman McDonald: I'll attempt a motion. Kate Aanenson: Before you start there's two things. I'm going to spin. Mayor Laufenburger: Well it's. Councilwoman Tjomhom: It's all there. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah you'd better read the whole thing Mr. McDonald. Councilman McDonald: I was going to. Okay I'll make a motion that the City Council recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Planning Case 17-12 for West Park as shown on the plans received May 18, 2017 subject to conditions of approval. The City Council recommends approval of the site plan for the construction of 82 townhouses for Planning Case 17-12 for West Park as shown on the plans received May 18, 2017 subject to conditions of approval. The City Council recommends approval of the variance request for Planning Case 17- 12 to allow a 25 foot setback from Waters Edge Drive, Lake Susan Drive and Highway 101 as shown on the plans received May 18, 2017 subject to conditions of approval. City Council recommends approval of ordinance and summary ordinance for publication purposes for the rezoning the property located at the southeast of Waters Edge Drive, west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Highway 212 and bisected by Lake Susan Drive with an approximate area of 9.8 acres from Residential Single Family and Planned Unit Development to Planned Unit Development -Residential incorporating design standards. Planning Case 17-12 subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of all the public drainage and utility easements on Lot 1, Block 1 of Gateway North as dedicated on the recorded plat thereof as described in Exhibit A. The City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of all the public drainage and utility easements on Lot 2, Block 2 and Outlot A of Gateway North as dedicated on the recorded plat thereof together with Document number 206358 as described in Exhibit A. I think that's it. 20 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. Before I ask for a second I just want to clarify one thing. Mr. Knutson, could you go back one page Kate? Okay Mr. Knutson, we are the approving body so we do not recommend for approval, is that correct? Roger Knutson: Technically the word should be replaced, recommended approvals should be replaced with approves. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so before I ask for a second, Mr. McDonald are you okay if we strike the words recommends. Councilman McDonald: Well I guess I just misread that. Mayor Laufenburger: No you read it the way it was. Councilman McDonald: City Council approves. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. So we have a motion for approval of a number of things. Now is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Councilman Campion: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Campion. Councilman Campion: I lost a race earlier so. Mayor Laufenburger: Is there any discussion on the motions? Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves preliminary plat for Planning Case 17-12 for West Park as shown on the plans received June 30, 2017, subject to the following conditions of approval: Enaineerine: The existing topographic survey shall include the existing first floor elevations of nearby structures such as 8751 Waters Edge Drive and 721 Lake Susan Drive. 2. Spot elevations shall be shown at the center of proposed driveways at the curb line so the driveway grade can be verified. 3. The applicant shall work with Carver County to see if the FES from their pond outlet can be combined with the county's culvert to eliminate the low spot adjacent to this site. 21 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 4. The plan shall show EOF locations and elevation for all basins on site. 5. Top and bottom wall elevations shall be shown on the grading plan. 6. All retaining walls shall be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association (HOA). The development plans shall call out the material of the retaining wall. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: smooth face, poured in place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber. 8. As existing public utilities are located within the vacation area, the applicant shall grant a drainage and utility easement to the City concurrent to recording the vacation. 9. The applicant shall have their survey confirm location of all easements with a recent title commitment prior to final plat. 10. The retaining wall and entry monuments are proposed within drainage and utility easements. These elements require an encroachment agreement prior to their construction. 11. The private sidewalks constructed within city right-of-way require an encroachment agreement. 12. All private streets will be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association. 13. Street lights shall be installed at the intersections with public streets. This light shall be owned by the City and maintained by MVEC (Minnesota Valley Electric Company). A $300 fee shall be collected with the development contract for electricity costs for the first year of operation. 14. The net SWMP Fee due at the time of final plat of the northern parcel is $53,237.19. 15. The net SWMP Fee due at the time of final plat of the southern parcel is $17,651.42. 16. For 64 units on the northern parcel, the sanitary partial fee is $44,224.00 and the water partial fee is $137,408.00. 17. For 18 units on the southern parcel, the sanitary partial fee is $12,438.00 and the water partial fee is $38,646.00. 18. The remaining hook-up fees will be due with the building permit at the rate in effect at that time. 22 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 19. The vertical curves shall be revised to meet the City Code standard to have the curve length be greater than the difference of the grades multiplied by 20. 20. The horizontal alignment of several horizontal curves radii do not meet requirements for a 30 mph roadway without superelevation per the MnDOT Roadway Design Manual. The applicant shall submit documentation for the design speed used for these roads and the anticipated signed speed. Speed signage shall be required. Park and Trail Conditions of Approval: Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for the West Park Residential Subdivision. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per multi-family/apartment dwelling, the total park fees will be $311,600. 2. 82 units x $3,800 each. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves site plan for the construction of 82 townhouses for Planning Case 17-12 for West Park, as shown on the plans received June 30, 2017, subject to the following conditions of approval: En¢ineerina• The Engineering Department recommends approval of the final plat subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall submit the full SWPPP document to the City for review prior to grading on site. 2. No parking signage shall be installed at all turnarounds to keep them open for public safety access. All private street signage shall comply with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 4. The sidewalk and pedestrian ramps shall be constructed per the Chanhassen Standard Detail Plates. All sidewalks internal to the site shall be owned and maintained by the HOA. 23 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 6. The sidewalk connection parallel to Lake Susan Drive shall be owned and maintained by the City. The HOA shall be responsible for snow maintenance on sidewalks adjacent to HOA property. 8. The applicant shall revise plans to call out the size of proposed water main. 9. The applicant's engineer shall add a column to the stormwater pipe/structure table to list the velocities of the pipes. 10. Stomtwater pipe within the development shall be privately owned and maintained. 11. The storm sewer/water main crossing near CB MH 702 may be in conflict. The applicant's engineer shall verify this when the utility profiles are drafted. 12. The applicant shall meet the minimum requirements for stormwater set forth in City Code Section 9-VH and requirements of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. 13. The applicant must obtain a permit from the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District prior to grading the site. 14. The applicant is responsible for obtaining permits from applicable regulatory agencies (MDH, MPCA, MnDOT, etc.) prior to construction. 15. The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). 16. Sidewalk constructed within MnDOT right-of-way may require a Limited Use Permit (LUP). 17. The plan for flared stormwater pipes that discharge into the pond, infiltration basin and right- of-way shall be modified to have non -erosive velocities (3.5-5.0 feet per second). 18. The pipe from FES 500 to OCS 501 shall be modified to have a slope of 1.00 percent or greater to prevent standing water and reduce the potential for ice damage. Building Conditions: 1. Accessibility must be provided to all portions of the development and a percentage of the units may also be required to be accessible or adaptable in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. Further information is needed to determine these requirements. 24 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 2. Buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system. For the purposes of this requirement property lines do not constitute separate buildings. 3. The buildings will be required to be designed by an architect and engineer as determined by the Building Official. 4. The developer must submit a list of proposed street name(s) to the Fire Marshal and Building Official for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. 5. Demolition permits must be obtained before demolishing any structures on the site. Application for such permits must include hazardous substances investigation and proposed mitigation reports. 6. A final grading plan and geotechnical (soils evaluation) report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits will be issued. 7. Walls and projections within 5 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire - resistive construction. 8. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 9. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 10. The developer and/or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Fire Marshal: 1. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. Street signs (temporary allowed) shall be installed prior to building permits being issued. Fire Chief must approve signage. 3. Prior to combustible construction fire hydrants shall be made serviceable. FAI Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 4. Prior to combustible home construction fire apparatus access roads capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus shall be made serviceable. 5. Relocate the fire hydrant on Stonegate road eighty (80) feet to the west. (At the intersection of Stonegate and Stonegate) 6. On Eagle View Road add a fire hydrant between block 5 and block 6. 7. In order to avoid duplicating street names, submit new proposed street names to Fire Chief and Building Official for review and approval. Plannine: 1. Approval of this site plan is contingent upon approval of the final plat for Gateway North. 2. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement. 3. The building shall comply with the Planned Unit Development building setback requirements. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves the variance request for Planning Case 17-12 to allow a 25-foot setback from Waters Edge Drive, Lake Susan Drive, and Highway 101, as shown on the plans received June 30, 2017, subject to the following conditions of approval: Approval of the Variance is contingent upon approval of the Site Plan and Subdivision applications Planning Case 17-12. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves rezoning the property located at the southeast of Waters Edge Drive, west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Highway 212 and bisected by Lake Susan Drive with an approximate area of 9.8 acres from Residential Single Family and Planned Unit Development to Planned Unit Development -Residential, incorporating the following design standards: 26 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 WEST PARK PUD DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a RESIDENTIAL PUD. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive development. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to four, five, and six plex complexes. The total number of units for the entire site may not exceed 99 92 units. C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Boundary Building/ Parking Setbacks feet Highway 101 25/10 Highway 212 25/25 Northerly Project Property Line 25/25 Westerly Project Property Line 25/20 Internal Project property lines 0 /0 Hard Surface Coverage -Residential 50 % Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height 35 or 3 stories, whichever is less * parking setbacks maybe reduced to 10 feet if full screening is provided. d. Residential Building Materials and Design Buildings and site design shall comply with design standards outlined in Article XXIII. General Supplemental Regulations, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. 1. All units shall have access onto an interior private street. 2. A design palette shall be approved for the entire project. The palette shall include colors for siding, shakes, shutters, shingles, brick, stone, etc. 3. All foundation walls shall be screened by landscaping or retaining walls. 27 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 4. All adjoining units must exhibit different exterior design features and color. e. Site Landscaping and Screening The intent of this section is to improve the appearance of vehicular use areas and property abutting public rights -of -way; to require buffering between different land uses; and to protect, preserve and promote the aesthetic appeal, character and value of the surrounding neighborhoods; to promote public health and safety through the reduction of noise pollution, air pollution, visual pollution and glare. The landscaping standards shall provide for screening for visual impacts associated with a given use, including but not limited to parking areas, utility boxes, unadorned building massing, etc. 2. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces, except for the fire pit area, shall be landscaped, rockscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 3. Undulating berms, shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. 4. Native species shall be incorporated into site landscaping, whenever possible. f. Street Furnishings Benches, trash receptacles, planters and other street furnishings should be of design and materials consistent with the character of the area. Wherever possible, street furnishings should be consolidated to avoid visual clutter and facilitate pedestrian movement. g. Signage The intent of this section is to establish an effective means of communication in the development, maintain and enhance the aesthetic environment, to improve pedestrian and traffic safety, to minimize the possible adverse effect of signs on nearby public and private property, and to enable the fair and consistent enforcement of these sign regulations. It is the intent of this section, to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community by regulating signs that are intended to communicate to the public, and to use signs which meet the city's goals: a. Preserve and promote civic beauty, and prohibit signs which detract from this objective because of size, shape, height, location, condition, cluttering or illumination; 0 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 b. Ensure that signs do not create safety hazards; c. Ensure that signs are designed, constructed, installed and maintained in a manner that does not adversely impact public safety or unduly distract motorists; d. Preserve and protect property values; e. Ensure signs that are in proportion to the scale of, and are architecturally compatible with, the principal structures; g.l. Monument Sian: One monument sign shall be permitted at the entrances to the development off of Lake Susan Drive. These signs shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than five feet in height. These signs shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. g.2. Sian Design and Permit Requirements: a. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material and height throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. b. All signs require a separate sign permit. h. Lighting 1. Lighting for the interior of the development shall be consistent throughout the development. Fixtures with decorative natural colored pole shall be used throughout the development in parking and street lighting. Decorative, pedestrian scale lighting shall be used in the fire pit area and sidewalk areas and may be used in parking lot areas. 2. Light fixtures should be kept to a pedestrian scale (12 to 18 feet). 3. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than '/z candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. i. Residential Parking shall comply with city code requirements. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Resolution #201748: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of all the public drainage and 29 Chanhassen City Council — July 10, 2017 utility easements on Lot 1, Block 1 of GATEWAY NORTH as dedicated on the recorded plat thereof as described in Exhibit A. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Resolution #201749: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of all the public drainage and utility easements on Lot 2, Block 2 and Outlot A of GATEWAY NORTH as dedicated on the recorded plat thereof together with Document No. 206358 as described in Exhibit A. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves Planning Case 17-12 subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: Ms. Aanenson I have a question for you. Kate Aanenson: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Will this item ever come back to the council again? Kate Aanenson: Yes you'll see it at final plat and I believe the applicant's working trying to get that on the next meeting and we're getting towards the end of getting projects launched for construction season so you will see the plat. Mayor Laufenburger: So when the final plat comes that's when we approve the layout, everything that would then follow with building permits, movement of dirt, etcetera. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Is that correct: Kate Aanenson: Yeah it will be a site plan agreement. There probably isn't any public improvements in this so there wouldn't be a development contract but there would still be a site plan agreement tying them to all the conditions of approval and I'd just like to take one moment just to thank Sharmeen AI-Jaff on our staff who probably worked on this, this property probably for 6-7 years and the applicant to what we believe is a really good project for this site. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Well thank you Mr. Heuer. Best of luck in developing your final plat. We hope to see you soon, alright. Okay. Alright thank you. VENUE/ALDI: APPROVE SITE PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT, SIX STORY APARTMENT BUILDING AND A ONE-STORY, 19,000 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING WITH A Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Aller: Having a motion and a second, any further discussion? Hearing none I'll put the matter to a vote. Madsen moved, Yusuf seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance request to allow for a second driveway access at 2740 Orchard Lane, subject to the following conditions and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision: The applicant must apply for and receive a driveway permit. 2. Tree protection fencing shall be installed around existing trees prior to any construction activities. 3. Double silt fence must be in place to protect the wetland prior to any excavation of the site. 4. The driveway must be constructed in accordance with current construction requirements/details as well as the requirements in City Code Section 20-122 Access and Driveways. 5. The driveway shall be surfaced with bituminous, concrete or paver surface. 6. As stipulated by City Code Section 20-977 the detached garage may not be use to operate or store material for a home occupation. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. Aller: Okay we have two other items coming before us for public hearing. With the commissioners permission I'd like to kind of take a poll and see who's here on what and try to deal with the one with the biggest impact first or second, whichever way we'd like to do it so by a raise of hands those individual who are here for item 2, West Park. I have 2, 4, 6, 7. And item 3, the Venue at Aldi. 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. Probably just take them as is. There doesn't seem to be a big significant difference. Is staff ready to go with item 2 which is West Park? PUBLIC HEARING: WEST PARK. 8601 GREAT PLAINS BOULEVARD: REZONING, SITE PLAN REVIEW, SUBDIVISION, AND VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH VARIANCES ON PROPERTY ZONED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RSF) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF AN 82 UNIT TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT AND LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF WATERS EDGE DRIVE, WEST OF GREAT PLAINS BOULEVARD, NORTH OF HIGHWAY 212 AND BISECTED BY LAKE SUSAN DRIVE. APPLICANT: PULTE HOMES. OWNER: BRIAN KLINGELHUTZ. 31 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Al -Jaffa Good evening Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission. The application before you is for West Park which entails a rezoning of property, a site plan review approval, a subdivision, a variance and a vacation of right-of-way. The vacation is something that is voted on by the City Council only. However as an informational item we're including it in this request. Briefly the site is located south of Waters Edge Drive, north of Highway 212, west of Great Plains Boulevard and it's bisected by Lake Susan Drive. It has an area of 9.8 acres. Just a brief background. So there are, in 2006 the City approved a planned unit development application. That really encompassed properties located north as well as south of Highway 212. The southern piece of, the piece that lies south of 212 was mainly commercial types of uses. The area that is north of Highway 212 was guided residential. It is mixed use residential, or mixed use land use which means you may have high density residential on these properties. That allows up to 16 units per acre. We have an apartment building that was built, Gateway Place, Sand's Company which is located at the northwest intersection of 212 and 101. The remaining parcels have always been viewed as a transition area. If we look at the area to the north of, and west of this site it's mainly residential single family homes. When the subject site came in, which is what you see before you in this slide. As I mentioned it is north of the apartment building, west of Highway 212 and then you have the residential single family homes north and west of that portion. We immediately and with every developer that we talk to we said it has to be a transition area between all of these elements meaning the density that you have within that section and the type of housing has to be between residential single family and high density which leads us to townhouse development. Another thing that constrains the site is the fact that it is located within the shoreland overlay district of Lake Susan. Any development, so it's the northern portion of the site that lies within Lake Susan's Overlay District. Anything within the shoreland Overlay District has to maintain 50 percent open space. Any structure built within that area may not exceed 35 feet in height. The land uses within this area. So the northeasterly portion is medium density which allows 8 units per acre maximum. Then you have the northwesterly portion which allows 4 units per acre maximum. Anything that is shown in red, which is the mixed use, up to 16 units per acre. When we looked at the number of acres that we have and the land uses, total number of units that are permitted on this site is 99 units. What the applicant came in with was a townhouse development, and before I get into this application. Over the last I would like to say 5 or 6 years we have met with truly a number of developers that have come in with apartment buildings. Units that preserve the existing, there's a barn on the site. The proposals have called for turning it into a community space. We've looked at iterations that included potential clinics and quite a few apartment buildings on that site as well. Staff has always maintained that we need that transition zone between the high density, the highway and the single family units that are out there. One of the other things that we talked to the developer about was trying to orient the front of the homes towards the residential single family low density homes and the garages to keep the doors to the garages internal. We wanted to ensure that there is minimal traffic conflict with the existing road systems that are out there. The application before you is for 82 units. The density is below 8 units per acre. Access to the site is gained off of Lake Susan Drive. One of the things that they, that the developer attempted to do and was able to work with the apartment buildings owners is to utilize the same access Point to serve the southerly portion of the site. As far as materials that will be used on the 32 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 exterior of the homes, it is a combination of lapped siding as well as cultured stone. And the applicant did submit architectural plans. However at this time, at this moment they are building extremely similar units in the city of Plymouth. They provided us with pictures of these units and what we will have different than what is being built in the city of Plymouth is different garage doors. As you can see these garage doors are just plain versus the ones in Chanhassen will have windows on them as well as decorative handles. Our color palette is going to be larger. More variety. No two units will be the same next to each other and since this is a planned unit development we are able to create design criteria for it and all of the design criteria has basically prescribed that these design elements be implemented that I was just going over. Some of the amenities that you will find within this development include decorative light fixtures. Pedestrian scaled light fixtures. Gathering areas with a fire pit. This cultured stone that you will see. So this is the cultured stone that you will see throughout the development on the buildings themselves as well as the other elements that I will be going through in a moment. Okay. So they will be used on the fire pit. Potential seating areas. The entrance into the development there will be monument signs that will be utilizing that stone. The community mailboxes, the base for them will be using that cultured stone and then also to define the corners into this development or the comer properties of this overall development the applicant will be utilizing pillars with wrought iron fencing and again that stone. The theme of the stone is going to be carried through again. To accommodate all of this the applicant is proposing to subdivide the property into 82 lots and 8 outlots. This is really a straight forward subdivision. The parcels will accommodate the townhouses and then the outlots are mainly for community spaces, the private streets as well as storm ponds. The parks that will be serving this community that are located within half a mile of the site are Lake Susan Park as well as Bandimere Community Park. One thing that I neglected to mention is the variance that staff is recommending approval of. When we were looking at this application, and because the fagade of these buildings really does not contain anything other than a patio. A sun room. Windows. There are no garages. There are no driveways. We asked the applicant to put the buildings closer to the street. Actually 25 feet from the property line. The ordinance requires a 50 foot setback when it's a planned unit development. 50 foot setback from the exterior of a planned unit development parcel. In this case the 25 foot is adequate. It provides for more room for longer driveways to accommodate cars to be parked internally. And with that staff is recommending approval of this application for the preliminary plat, site plan, variance and rezoning and the Findings of Fact and Decision. Aanenson: If I may Mr. Chairman, I'm just going to add a couple things. Can you go back to the very beginning. Keep going. All the different land uses. I just want to tell you a little bit more about the history on this. I mean Sharmeen's work on this property for, has probably seen so many projects on here. I just want to go we have the different land uses. The density and I just want to give a little bit of history of context of how we got here. What she didn't mention was the Mission Hills which you recently approved across the street. So you have to remember how this density all came about. It was originally what we called a mixed use district. We had two of them in the city and so some of it became commercial. Some of it became different medium and low densities under when the Klingelhutz family had this and the Curry family. Sc over the years we actually worked with SRF and actually did some design scenarios at this 33 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 intersections because even when we did the Kwik Trip center there was a lot of consternation within the neighborhood so we kind of looked through all those properties and at the time that we were doing that there was reluctance on the Klingelhutz family to change some of those land uses because we had some other recommendations and because of that it forced some more vertical product in there and we just didn't feel like that was a good fit and nothing seemed to ever really work well. With the impediment of the shoreland district and try to blend between the commercial, as Sharmeen mentioned, the existing apartments which met the criteria which could have been more vertical on this property and then the senior Mission Hills project across the street which I think they were hopeful would get commercial zoning but really again even an office use on that was difficult because as you know the tam movements coming out of that so we are really pleased to have a project that we think makes a good transition for the neighborhood and like I said Sharmeen's worked on a number of projects on this and actually spent a lot of time with the developer on this really fine tuning it so I just wanted to give you a little more context. So when 101 moved over we still had this kind of funny, fuzzy different land uses on that property so that's what led to compiling all those densities together to as Sharmeen showed you what the ultimate mix would be. That's because there was 3 or 4 different land uses underneath that so the total density, this project comes underneath that total density and it's a lower height and lower impact as we saw it into the neighborhood so we are happy to get this project to this point and thank the developer for working hard to do that. Aller: Okay, thank you. Any questions of staff at this point? Commissioner Weick. Weick: If you could actually go back to that page 6 of 41 with the total units allowed. I'm just looking for clarification of, it shows as mixed use on page 5 in that chart and then in this chart it says high density. So is this a worst case of what could be built in mixed use? Aanenson: ...high density. That's the mixed use part of it. It could be commercial or could be high density. Weick: Commercial or high density. Aanenson: Correct. Weick: Could it be anything? Could it be single family? Aanenson: Yes but that, yeah. Well it allows up to 6...I don't think anyone would bring that into the marketplace. Weick: What, say that again. Aanenson: Nobody was going to bring that to the marketplace based on the surrounding properties. 34 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Weick: Okay. Aanenson: Like I say we've looked at a number of projects over the time so yeah. Weick: Okay. Thank you. And then the second question was on, and I'm sorry my notes got mixed up. Bear with me for a second. Page 23. Oh could you just point out, I know you described one area where the variance to the 25 feet. Is that the only area? AI-Jaff. Yes. Well it's the, what we recommended is that the parameter of the planned unit development. Weick: Okay. AI-Jaff: Maintains a 25 foot setback. Weick: Okay, okay. So you were just pointing out where it's especially important on the north side. AI-Jaff: Exactly. Weick: Okay. AI-Jaff: And there are existing trees that the applicant has truly made an effort to save along the northern portion of the property. Another thing we need to bear in mind for instance Highway 101, the right-of-way is substantial in width and there are areas where, if you give me one moment. Right here. This illustrates what's happening along the east portion of the property. The actual highway sits right here. At some point in the future MnDOT could potentially turn this over to the City. There might be a potential for vacation but there is a substantial distance between the actual pavement of a highway and where those units are going to be located. Weick: Okay, thank you. Aller: Any additional questions? Tietz: Just a question. Is it assumed in a planned unit development such as this that all the visitor or a majority of the visitor parking is in the driveways of each unit because I see very few stalls that would provide additional parking other than adjacent to the units. Is that accurate or am I just misreading it? AI-Jaff: So when we calculate the parking we assume that everything will be accommodated within the guest parking that the applicant is required to provide as part of the site plan, which they have. They meet the requirements but in addition to that, let's say somebody has a party. 35 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 They will be able to park in the driveway and this way you're avoiding the public street parking so it's just an alternative. Tietz: Yeah. I know it's a difficult situation to provide additional parking. I know we visited friends who are in similar type settings and you have a group of 8 or 10 folks and 6 cars and there's a driveway big enough for 2 cars and somebody else down the lane is having 6 or 8 folks over and all of a sudden, and the roads within these areas are quite narrow. They're private and as I understand this is all private road system. AI-Jaff: Correct. Tietz: So then where do people park? It just seemed, you know it's a challenge obviously but I don't see a resolution in this particular plan. AI-Jaff: There is guest parking that is available within this development. Tietz: Yeah, pretty limited. Aller: Additional questions? Hearing none we'll have the applicant come forward and make a presentation. Welcome sir. If you'd state your name and address for the record and your representational capacity if any that would be great. Paul Heuer: Thank you, good evening. I'm Paul Heuer with Pulte Homes, 7500 Office Ridge Circle, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344. We're happy to be here this evening. We have Clark Wickland with Alliant Engineering so he might answer a couple questions if I get stuck on something. Also Eric Paget from our office at Pulte Homes. I'd like to just have a short presentation that covers some of the things that Sharmeen didn't cover. She did a great job covering everything related to zoning and your issues but you might have questions on the market we're after and things like that, price point so I'd just like to cover those things briefly. So we build about 500 homes in the Twin Cities a year and pretty large builder. We built in Chanhassen in the past and have had success here. We love your city. When we look at what we are trying to imagine for a vision for this particular site it was really to create a neighborhood that had a sense of place and it would be a good place for first time homeowners that would be near amenities and the things really going for it is the school district is very strong here. You do have a number of amenities nearby within walking distance. The transit station. The retail to the south. A park just to the southwest. A great trail system so really a number of things that are really attractive to folks. As far as our homes and our buyers we're looking for primarily singles and young couples. Maybe some young families. These are two story homes. We occasionally get some empty nesters too in these sorts of homes but it's really aimed at kind of a younger group. We do expect that the price points would be somewhere between the mid $200,000's and the mid $300,000's. The sizes of the homes start at about 1,850 feet. Square feet. There are options where they can actually have more versatility to the home. Have more room. For 36 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 instance there's a half story above the second story that could be finished as a bonus room and there's another unique offering which is a rear rooftop terrace where there's kind of a cut into the rooftop there and an outdoor terrace as well so pretty versatile housing product that appeals to a wide variety of people but again we believe will primarily have singles, young couples, those sorts of people. Let's see and the neighborhood itself. We focused really hard on the sidewalk connections to the local amenities. We mentioned the playground. The retail. The transit center so you'll notice that we've got some internal private sidewalks that really strategically guide each homeowner to trails on the perimeter of the site that guide them to those amenities. And lastly in terms of coordination, we did have a neighborhood meeting back on May 11`s. We met with the Sand's Company as Sharmeen has mentioned. They wholeheartedly support the shared entrance on the south side of Lake Susan Drive and they support our project too. And finally we've been coordinating with a couple of other developers you've been dealing with just on construction issues. Dirt work. Foxwood as well as Mission Hills. We've been in contact with both of those folks. They both seem to have some excess dirt on their properties and we're a little bit short so we've been coordinating to try to have very efficient kind of short hauls of dirt from local developments. So that's really it. In terms of phasing and schedule, our plan is to develop the north property in 2017, this year and the southern property in 2018 and we anticipate building out entirely probably around the year 2020. That's really it. I'd be happy to take any questions. Aller: Okay, I'm sure that the questions during your meetings, and thank you for having them with the community because I think that's super important that the community have some input into all the development in the area. What did you hear about traffic concerns and what were your responses regarding traffic and then also the impact that this price point would have on the surrounding homes that are already in existence? Paul Heuer: Okay first we'll cover parking. You're talking about parking right when you say traffic? Allen. Traffic and parking. Paul Heuer: Yeah. You know over the decades these sorts of attached row home units have been built in cities throughout the Twin Cities and throughout the country and over time cities have developed ordinances that require specific amount of parking per unit and they found a point where it works and for each of these units of course there's 2 stalls in the garage, 2 on the driveway and we've got guest stalls which if you look at the site plan they're strategically placed so people don't have to walk too far so I think it's safe to say that this is not like a single family home where you can have a graduation party and people can line up and down the streets parking. You know you can't have a graduation parry in a row home and I think people generally understand that but if you have 4 or 5 people over there's room for that certainly. So if we felt we would have a problem with that and our customers would complain you know we wouldn't be building them. We make sure we have enough that we feel comfortable and when we, when we build homes we find that many times our customers are referred from previous 37 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 customers or they're our past customers. They buy 2, 3, 4, even 5 homes from us over the life's that they have so we don't have an interest in making our customers feel like they've been taken. We have a long term interest in having these relationships with these customers because we know we rely on them to refer people and to continue buying from us so we've built many of these townhomes. Less in the last 10 years since, long story but we haven't seen many townhomes in the Twin Cities for about the last 10 to 12 years but we're starting to explore that market again. We're starting to see some success and we're building them basically with the same layouts in terms of parking but with much more versatile architecture. You might have noticed in the past, just quickly, I know I'm getting off track just a bit. Aller: No, no, that's fine. Paul Heuer: But in the past they all used to be the same color and the same architecture and as a council in another city once said, you know after I have a couple wines I want to know which home is mine. But now it's kind of Version 2.0 where we really do have more effort being made to have each one of these units architecturally stylized and individualized so that they look good. In terms of the parking this is what we've been doing for decades and it's proven to work. The other issue, I'm sorry. There was two questions you had. Aller: There was parking, traffic and then valuation. Paul Heuer: Valuation. Aller: Surrounding valuation. Paul Heuer: Yeah and this is always difficult to describe. The way I look at land, as we look for land to buy across the Twin Cities is every land, every piece of land wants to be something. You know you can't force a Holiday station store a mile off the main highway unless there's a lot of traffic going there. There's certain characteristics that really make land want to be something. In this particular case, I mentioned all the positive traits. The parks. The retail. The transit station. The great access to the road. Those are all great traits but of course there are constraints too and in this particular case the one big constraint is you've got some major roadways right there. You've got Highway 212 and Highway 101. You've got an intersection there that's very busy right outside of this so this is not a place where you'd really be able to sell very expensive homes so it wants to be something that is more dense than single family homes. It really doesn't want to be apartments because you have single family homes right across a residential street to the west and to the north so this really does fit in terms of what the land wants to be. What it can best accommodate and the best use of the land. You know that's kind of side stepping of your question but I think it's related because the land can only be what it can be so therefore as long as you're not trying to force fit something on that land that it doesn't want to be then you're not harming valuations. W. Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Alter: Great. Any additional questions? Thank you sir. At this point in time I'll open up the public hearing portion of this item. It's an opportunity for those individuals, jump right up there, to speak either for or against. Liz Kozub: It's my bedtime so I need to get home. So my name is Elizabeth, Liz Kozub. Address 8661 Chanhassen Hills Drive North, Chanhassen, Minnesota. So first I do want to appreciate having these online meetings throughout the month of May when I haven't been able to make it to the meetings. I appreciate being able to watch them. I do hope over time Chanhassen could figure out a way to be more interactive. That even if you can't spend 2 hours of your night and having to pay a babysitter to watch your kids for 2 hours of a night to be here that we could still have some interaction. So thoughts for future involvement. Couple things that I wanted to bring up. So I do overall like the townhome idea so I'm not fully against but there are some things I do want to consider. If you could go to the picture one. Next one. Where it looks, what it currently looks like. So there's just some things that, of the map. Yeah. So there are some things that I want to discuss. One of the May meetings Kate I think you brought up that when the exit ramp from 212 was added to our neighborhood there was some concern of cut through and that was never found to be true, and I don't know if a traffic analysis survey has been done but I know when we go on nightly walks I see people cut through there all the time. You can see where the trail is right outside the yellow line. That's how you get to the trail which is a great place when your kids are learning how to ride their bikes. I see cars go past there 45-50 miles every single day and it concerns me to now add 82 homes to an already populated area where people don't live in our neighborhood. They cut through all the way to Lyman and back. I know all the cars in our neighborhood that I would want to look at how are we trying to avoid extra traffic. Are we going to have speed humps and try to avoid more additional cut through. I know at one of the meetings you said that the people cutting through are the people in the neighborhood and they're not. The people in our neighborhood, because a lot of us have young kids or know the neighbors have young kids, we drive slow and so I want to be concerned about that main thoroughfare right there in the neighborhood. Another concern that I have is just the design of the townhomes. Have there been consideration of also single level townhomes? I know from family members trying to buy downsize. They don't want to go to a senior living apartment. There are really hard, there's not a whole lot of availability for one level townhomes and having this be a mixed use project why can't we have some single family townhomes and not just two story on this plot as well? I know that it doesn't allow for profits because you have to have less homes on that area but I think when we look at our whole community, not just young families but we want all of those generations to be in the neighborhood together. Two other questions that I have, or three. I didn't know about a community meeting and I'm pretty active. Now this is my second time coming here to speak. How was that advertised and how was input selected? I, talking to our neighbors at the park this last week no one knew about this development and so how was that involvement done? I am shocked because I was here the whole month of May and didn't know anything about it. Our park, one of our swings is broken. Can we get that fixed? Because if we're going to be adding more kids you're talking about 82 new families, we don't even have enough swings right now. We have 3 out of the 4 in use. Can we double the amount of swings? And lastly after every at] Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 construction project the roads get worst because of all the heavy machinery going in there. What's going to be the long term plan to repair the roads after all the heavy machinery leaves? Those are my questions and thoughts. And when you look at the land you have the pumpkin patch right there so we're getting rid of the pumpkin patch, which is fine. I know that can't stay forever and I do like all the greenery that is there. I still don't think that 25 feet, it feels too metro to me. It feels too claustrophobic and we don't live in downtown Minneapolis that we want buildings right on top of the road. That you want to have it more suburban and not urban feel so that's my thoughts. Alter: Thank you. Before somebody else gets up, Kate did you want to address notice issues or tell us how the notices provided on these projects? Aanenson: I'm assuming that the mailing list the developer got was the same mailing list that the neighborhood got. Our ordinance, the State law is 300 feet. We do 500 feet within the subject site so typically the developer's given that same list so it should have been the same. Alter: Okay. And then for active individuals or people that are just interested in it again on the website we do list all the projects that are upcoming as they're coming along so it's great that you're keeping an eye on that. And of course there are contact information so that you can hit our parks and recs director and make suggestions about swings. Aanenson: I would also add too, yeah. We also have a site on that you can go right into the City's portal and any issues that you have, whether it's a stop sign that's down or swing that's broken. You put that in and someone will respond to you right away and so please do that. Liz Kozub: Okay, I'll do that but I think when you're talking about you like the spot because it's by the parks, well then how are we investing in our current parks to expand if we anticipate 82 new families with potentially young kids to be there? Our current park isn't allowed, the capacity isn't for that so as a developer who will be profiting from this, how are you going to be giving back to our community to make it better than when you leave? Aanenson: Mr. Chair we can answer that question too. We are requiring park and trail fees being dedicated to help supplement the infrastructure so that is a condition of approval. Alter: And ongoing right now I understand there's a major project where we're looking at all our parks and they're doing review of the status of our parks. Aanenson: Correct. So the Park and Recreation Commission reviewed this project. They make a recommendation. Their recommendation was not to take land but take, so in every project you can take land or take cash in lieu of so I'd have to look up that exact number but that is a condition of approval is to take that and that would be built into existing or for future parks. Alter: Right. 40 Chanhassen Planning Commission —June 20, 2017 Aanenson: And then as far as traffic I'll let engineering staff answer those questions. Aller: Thank you. Fauske: Thank you. Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission, a good point brought up with the 212 ramp and that was certainly some of the feedback that staff heard from the neighborhood when 212 was under construction. My understanding is there was some monitoring of traffic movement through the neighborhood and they at that time did not see any cut through traffic. Perhaps people have changed some driving patterns and are now seeing this as an attractive alternative. With regards to the speed that some of the residents have witnessed, we can certainly get some, it's not a speed trailer out there anymore but we do have one of those signs that posts the speed limit and will show drivers what their speed is and if there's a speeding issue in there then we can work with the sheriff's department to address that. Another concern that a resident brought up was with regards to the long term repairs to the roadway system. Just very quickly for the Planning Commission and for the resident's knowledge based here, the City does invest in getting the street conditions surveyed every 3 years and we monitor that in the engineering department and make recommendations to the council for capital improvement plans for resurfacing streets. At this time there is nothing planned in the 5 year capital improvement plan for this area but we do monitor the pavement condition and start to utilize methods other than maintenance such as sealcoating. A structural project such as a mill and overlay can be recommended to council for budgetary needs if we see that pavement deteriorate to a point where it would warrant that. Aller: Okay, thank you. Okay moving on any additional comments? Please sir. Come on forward and state your name and address for the record. Aaron Stephan: Hi, my name is Aaron Stephan. I'm also at 8661 Chanhassen Hills Drive North. I live in the same house as her. So I just wanted to add on a few additional points. I just wanted to clarify when she was describing the two parks that would serve this community. She mentioned that it was Lake Susan Park but it's actually Chanhassen Hills Park. Lake Susan Park is on the north end of the lake. Aanenson: I stand corrected. Aaron Stephan: Yes. Yeah okay just making sure because my understanding, so he was mentioning that there's a beautiful park to the southwest. He was referring to Bandimere Park which is a wonderful park. My inclination is to think that most people living in that community will use the Chanhassen Hills Park which is a much smaller park and much fewer amenities compared to Bandimere so if we're thinking of diverting some of those funds I would divert more of those towards Chanhassen Hills Park. Yeah as has been mentioned it's nearly doubling the number of houses in the community and I am also concerned about the traffic coming through on the main thoroughfare. The Lake Susan Drive especially from the, is it west side? If 41 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 there is plans for traffic mitigation that would be really helpful because I've seen people driving 50 miles an hour readily through that neighborhood. Overall I do like the design and structure of the townhouses and I agree that it's a perfect transition from the Gateway Apartments that are there to the rest of the residential homes that are there. The apartments that are there, related to the parks again is the fact that there are a lot of kids that live in the Gateway Apartments. There will be more kids that move into that community and the way for them to get to either of those parks is quite a long haul. Walk so I don't know if they've considered adding at least some sort of playground directly on site. I don't know if that's a consideration. If not we might want to consider some sort of like path or walkway to the local park because otherwise I'm afraid people, you're just going to have too many people walking along the road to get there. It's really probably inconvenient for people to go to Bandimere just simply because you're crossing 212 and you're going over the bridge and there's just this like feeling of a barrier to walk and I think most people won't use it. My only other big point that I wanted to make was regarding the stormwater runoff. I read through some of those documents. There's a lot I don't understand in it but I'm interested and concerned a little bit because if you look at the current land as it stands there's a very deep ditch and it's clearly maintaining a lot of stormwater runoff. The way the stormwater management analysis was done shows that the water runs in three different directions off of that property. My concern is mostly from the north end of things. They said or they showed basically that they plan to install, it's like 2 to 3 NURP ponds I believe. Smith: Were you talking, the ditch? Were you talking about the southern parcel or the northern parcel? Aaron Stephan: No I'm talking about the northern parcel. Smith: Okay. I just want to make sure I have the right thing up on the screen. Aaron Stephan: So right now the northern parcel is anticipated, or right now it's estimated to have 1.190 cubic feet per second or whatever the units are, and that's anticipated to be changed according to developing that. And rightfully so there's going to be this development of a large pond in the middle it looks like and then another pond to the south, on the southern side of Lake Susan Drive. So the issue I have or questions are that we, I know Chanhassen used to have a person in charge of stormwater runoff. Jeffery's I think his name. Terry Jeffery and I was in contact with him because we also have stormwater runoff pond behind our property and it's actually dealing with some of the runoff that comes straight off of Waters Edge Drive and he was going to come and do an analysis and help us understand how development could affect some of the water in that back because I've been told at times it can dry out completely and other times now it's higher than it's ever been and so any change whatsoever to the runoff nearby is going to affect that water level. And as we all know all these NURP ponds are breeding grounds for our state bird and just wondering if there could possibly be some kind of provision to help with aeration or something like that to keep the new storm ponds aerated in a way that keeps those mosquitoes from breeding. In addition to keeping the mosquitoes away it also is a great way to reduce phosphorus. 85 percent reduction with aeration so I'm just a proponent of that if possible. 42 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 And then the last point was basically again about this 25 foot variance. I'm strongly opposed to the 25 foot variance. I think it'd be in everybody's best interest to lower the density of housing by 10 or 20 percent but stick to the 50 foot setback that's currently in law. I'm sorry? Aanenson: I think I just want to give the rational basis for that was that because we had so many vertical projects because that's what you're forcing then is because, that was our position on that. Aaron Stephan: Right. Sure. Aanenson: And a typical home has a driveway of, a home setback is 30 feet so if you look at that, that was our basis for that so this is 25 foot as opposed to a typical home which is 30 feet. Aaron Stephan: Okay well 30 feet would be better than the 25, whatever. Aanenson: Yeah. Aaron Stephan: So if you go kitty comer across the property to the Southwest Village townhomes that were developed not so long ago, those townhomes also do not have a garage in the front and they're also very close to the road and it gives me a claustrophobic feel when I drive by and to me I would hate for me to drive into my own neighborhood and feel that same claustra, I mean it's just something to think about. Setting back, having some green space ahead of the homes, inbetween the homes and the road. The more green space I think the better off the feel is and help the flow of the feel so those are my points. Aller: Thank you sir. Anyone else from 8661 that wants to? How about a neighbor? Susan Sura: I do not live with them. My name is Susan Sura. I live at 8524 Waters Edge Drive, Chanhassen. Aller: Welcome. Susan Sura: Thank you. Thank you so much for having us and thank you Pulte for holding the meetings last month for us so that we could understand more clearly what was occurring in our neighborhood. I live directly across the street from the proposed development on the north parcel and I again as well as these people would like to voice a strong dissent against 25 foot variance. I think that it is definitely an urban feel and if you look at the community out on Waters Edge Drive it is a beautiful piece of property. It's nature. It's Chanhassen at it's best and although the property screams to you to not be single family homes, it actually screams to me to be a single family home so we have two different opinions on that. I do appreciate the fact that we do have new development coming in but I would really encourage you to please not go with the 25 foot variance and stick with the 50 feet. As well as I'd like to know what happens to Lake Susan on this development because I do live on the lake. The lake is a mess. It's had a lot of problems in the past with various storm drainage problems and literally the little retention ponds 43 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 you could walk across them on water they are so green and awful so please address those as well. Thank you. Aller: Thank you. Any additional comments? Leslie Tidstrom: Hi. I'm Leslie Tidstrom. I live at 8679 Chanhassen Hills Drive. I've lived here for over 24 years and it is very sad to think that our neighborhood with beautiful homes. She mentioned the space. The free. The trees. We're growers here. Yeah we used to farm. We're not farming anymore but I think this area, I've seen Apple Tree Estates go up. Homes went up. They're a little nice homes. Fresh homes. I'd like to see fresh single family homes or maybe duplexes or something like that go in that still keep the same family feel. When you go through I could name all the families. All the scout families. All the school families that our kids go to school with all the kids and you know them. You see it on Halloween. Everybody's going door to door. They know each other so I strongly oppose this many, this much development going into our neighborhood with the big trees. And the water runoff we really have to seriously think about what's going to happen downstream of this project because the lake's right there and people are on top of springs and their sump pumps are running all the time so we'd better know what's going on underneath this development. Thank you. Aller. Thank you. Any additional comments? Yes sir. Tony Pavlovich: Good evening. Tony Pavlovich, 8640 Apple Tree Lane. I hope that each of the commissioners received the letter that I dropped off previously so you have a sense for some of my concerns which I'm echoing a lot of what has already been stated here but as a 30 year resident of Chanhassen, 3 years ago my wife and I decided to build a new home and we had a number of options that were available to us and what we decided to do is we knew we wanted to stay in Chanhassen. This is our home. This is where we belong. This is where our roots are in all of our associations. In looking around Chanhassen there wasn't a whole lot of options on where to look and then we found this slice, this area that again has provided us what I believe and was commented over here, a quality of life. And that quality of life means a lot to us and I believe that quality of life is at risk here and is going to be disrupted by the development of 82 units right across the street from us. So I'm also concerned as you know in the letter that I dropped off, again as part of that decision to stay in Chanhassen was to make for us the significant investment in the home that we built on Apple Tree Lane and from a property value standpoint that's a meaningful concern for me and I'm not sure of any developer, any home builder that would place a $250,000 townhome across the street from a $600,000 single family home. I haven't seen it so that certainly is a concern for me. Equally the 25 foot setback. Again that urbanization feel that it's going to feel for us like those townhouses are right on top of where we are. That's not something that I appreciate. All along one of the most significant or one of the reasons, there's a whole host of reasons why we ended up deciding to build in Chanhassen and stay here. However the piece of property that we chose was certainly contingent upon the understanding of what could be developed on the Klingelhutz Farm. We absolutely support development. We knew development would happen there someday. We anticipated that but we 0 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 anticipate that it would be single family homes, not what's being proposed here today. So appreciate the time. Aller: Thankyou sir. Anthony Dunham: Good evening. Anthony Dunham, 8650 Apple Tree Lane. Allen. Welcome. Anthony Dunham: The property just adjacent northeast, or the northwest comer of this property, or this development. Reiterating a couple of the points that have already been made. The stormwater runoff. You know that with the 25 foot setback concerns me because as somebody already mentioned my home is the most recent home that was built right there and my sump pump runs nonstop. It's going all the time so my concern is that this 25 foot setback then with that stormwater runoff, how's that going to impact my home and our community? And as the previous gentleman had stated you know we moved into or built on this property with the understanding that you know there was a certain level of, there's a certain level of home that we had to build to fit into that neighborhood and we made a large investment into this property with it being kind of our forever home. Knowing we're going to probably stay there until we retire and just that concern now of this many units being built directly across the street from where we're at concerns me. Thanks. Aller: Thank you sir. Welcome. Eric Chinnock: Good evening. My name is Eric Chinnock and I live at 8600 Apple Tree Lane and I would like to just kind of echo all the same comments from my friends and neighbors here. Specifically the north parcel I believe is currently zoned for 54 units and the current proposal is 64 units so I just thought it was interesting that we should increase it that much. I also purchased my home 4 years ago so just increasing that many more homes than were currently zoned there is different than what I expected. And the 25 foot setback I think is extremely concerning. If you walk by the townhouses that are over by Southwest Station it feels really claustrophobic and for point of reference the bam that's currently there is back significantly further than 25 feet so the homes that would be there would be closer than the barn is today. I'm not sure if you're familiar with the comer but the barn's pretty close to the comer. It's also in the inside of the comer so if you have children or anything, people go around there pretty fast the way it is. Now to all of a sudden impair the line of sight around an interior corner like that seems not like the right choice. And then to your point about what a property wants to be. If you look at the existing zoning I think that's kind of exactly how it speaks to now. So having you know maybe higher volume, denser townhouses closer and then tapering out into something like the single family retirement homes or duplexes or something like that to kind of transition the property and not have such a drastic change. But obviously on board with having development overall and I think townhouses is a good transition but I think it's just too many houses in that small of an area given the current neighborhood and really the 25 foot variance I think is too tight. Thank you. 45 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Aller: Thank you sir. Any additional comments? Seeing no one come forward I will close the public hearing. Open it up for commissioner comments and discussion. Anyone? Fauske: Mr. Chair? If I may it seems that there were a few comments with some questions with regards to stormwater drainage. If it's alright with you Mr. Chair perhaps the applicant's engineer would be able to speak to some of the surface water management that's proposed on the site with regards to the neighborhood's concerns. Aller: Excellent thought. So without opposition from the commissioners we'll ask the applicant to come forward. Tietz: Yeah Alyson do you know is there a perched water table in that area? I mean some of those homes are pretty high but I'm assuming there must be a perched with all the clay maybe it's a perched water table. Maybe we'll find out. Fauske: Yeah and throughout Chanhassen we see sump pumps going on the highest point in Chanhassen. We're certainly in the tight clays so it's not unusual for sump pumps unfortunately in Chanhassen to be running year round and that's a ground water which is highly variable. Not something that you can necessarily go and model based on what you see. I mean a soil boring will only give you the information at that location so there's certainly information that developer's gather that we utilize to set low floor elevations so that to the best of our ability we can provide some separation so that's what we do with the ground water component and then Mr. Wickland and Pulte could certainly speak to their surface water management plan. Aller: And in that same vein, if I could just butt in for a second. If the setback requirements that we're talking about are from dry land locations such as streets, as far as the setback. It's not from any delineated watershed or water district. Fauske: Yeah so the separation is from the lowest floor elevation to the highest known ground water elevation and it's the best that we can do based on the information we get and you know there's certainly building techniques that give the perimeter draintile so we do our best to get that separation and we're hopeful that for these homeowners that we provide some relief but it's certainly to go and impose a long term monitoring program on some of these sites before they can build on it is certainly not something that developers would be very happy with nor do we have the authority to do so. Tietz: And these appear to be all slab on grade is that correct? There's no walkout's. It's all slab on grade. Paul Heuer: That's correct. 46 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Tietz: So we would not be pumping anything from a lower level up to the surface and increasing the surface water, correct? Fauske: Correct. Ground water and surface water are certainly treated differently so I heard two different. Tietz: Right but I mean we wouldn't be adding to when you pump it out of your sump pump it's going someplace. Fauske: Yes. Tietz: And so these homes would not have sump pumps. Fauske: And from what I gleaned from the public hearing was that some of the residents indicated that they already have concerns with their sump pumps going and so if there's certain techniques that are being proposed with this development that might look for infiltration, that would exasperate that. I would leave that to Mr. Wickland to provide an answer. Aller: Thank you. Paul Heuer: Paul Heuer again. I'm just going to set some context and then let our engineer talk a little bit more. We never used to have stormwater ponds until the 1980's and then we realized we were flooding people downstream so we got smarter and now for about 30 years we've had gradual evolution of our regulations in stormwater, both for rate control so you prevent flooding but also water quality so that our water bodies are protected in terms of their quality and we've reached the point where we have it down scientifically pretty well. We know it works and the regulations are quite strict these days. In this particular case the north half of the north property falls within the shoreland district for Lake Susan so in that area we have even stronger requirements so regardless of the amount of setback we have we had to have 50 percent of that area within the shoreland district as open space. In addition we are actually re -using surface water so we're having a pump in the pond on the north side to use as irrigation for everything on the north side so we recirculate that water over and over. On the south side we're actually infiltrating because we have some soils on the south side that let us infiltrate water. If we could do that on the north side we'd do that as well but we just don't have the soils that allow the water to percolate easily so we spread it out over the lawn in terms of irrigation and let it really get absorbed by the plant material. So that's a little background so I think it's important to keep in mind that in this particular project we have much more stringent stormwater requirements than what is typical and we're dealing with them in a way that is really, really effective. Infiltration on the south side and stormwater re -use for irrigation on the north side. Clark Wickland: Well that was pretty thorough. Paul Heuer: Sony I didn't mean to... 47 Chanhassen Planning Commission —June 20, 2017 Clark Wickland: Well I think relative to the issues I've heard I think we can kind of speak to the plan as it's been developed and am I able to operate the cursor from up here? Well let's just maybe use the plan that's available right now and consider the north half of the property. As part of our analysis required by the City and required by the watershed district we are required to analyze rate of runoff, direction of runoff, water quality and volume reduction. And I'll share I guess a good thing relative to one of the resident's comments. Terry Jeffery kind of remains within the watershed though at Riley -Purgatory Watershed so he is performing all the review of our analysis modeling. We've made initial submittal to him. At the same time we made submittal to the City. He's already responded with review comments. We've responded to those. Nothing is of significance. That will go before the Board of Manager's meeting in mid - July. So specific to this project the project currently as depicted up there, all of that red area is essentially the watershed as it exists today on the left side and as you can see the lion share of it is central to the project which ultimately all drains easterly towards an inlet pipe that exists today that goes out to 212 or out to Highway 101. The proposed condition is depicted on the right of course with the outline of the units. The drainage area to the north, which is also depicted on the existing is slightly smaller so a greater area will go northerly or easterly into that central basin area. Now that central basin area essentially receives runoff from all of the property. As Mr. Heuer had shared we are going to reclaim water from there for irrigation of the project which is a pretty common technique supported by the watershed and most communities. It's been analyzed for rate going to the east for volume. For water quality, for what goes off site. It has certain requirements such as TSF removal. Phosphorus removal and such. It provides for all those conditions required of both the city and watershed. If we look at the property to the south, maybe not as relevant to tonight's meeting but as Mr. Heuer had shared, well this property too considering the existing watershed again delineated in red, all of it currently drains to an already existing basin at the very south end of that property. We are proposing to just expand onto that and make modification to it to provide the infiltration requirement for the project in that area since the subgrade material is suitable for that. Primarily sand so from a stormwater perspective and since the lion share of the site currently and is proposed to drain easterly away from the existing residential neighborhood to the west I would not feet that this would change anything hydrologically in that area. Does that answer the question? Aller: Yes. Any additional comments? Questions of staff? Questions of the applicant? Discussion. Randall: I've got one. Aller: Commissioner Randall. Randall: One of the questions I have, do we have any other areas that have the variance for the 25 foot setback within the city or is it something that's pretty new for us? AI-Jaff The development at Southwest Village actually has a 10 foot front yard setback. a-3 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Randall: Okay. I guess some of the concerns that I had with that, if you look at the pictures of the examples, you know it looked like in the rear people will have access to their somewhat back yard or whatever. That's not a lot of feet I guess if you're doing anything back there you know. I don't know are they going to have patios back there or are they going to have, were they going to have a grill or that type of thing or I don't know. That's the only concern I really had. Aller: Can the applicant respond to that and give us an idea of what it would look like in the back yards? Paul Heuer: Yes. Patios are an option and sunrooms are an option off the rear and could I address the setback issue? Aller: Please. Paul Heuer: As I understand it we're asking for a variance from the 50 foot setback from arterial roads which I'm assuming includes 101 and maybe Lake Susan Drive. When I look at Lake Susan Drive and how far the apartment building across the street is set back from the right-of- way line, if I'm recalling it correctly it's about what we're asking for, 25 feet so there's really no impact to anybody along there. In fact it makes for a more coherent consistent feel as you drive down Lake Susan Drive. The other area that we're asking for that variance from is along 101 and it was shown earlier the right-of-way line for 101 veers so far into where this development will be that honestly one of our big struggles is visibility. We try to create a neighborhood that's going to look cohesive and look right and when you enter that intersection, you take the exit ramp from 212 and you hit the intersection of 101 and Lake Susan Drive really and you see our development it's far back and even more so we have a pond there so there's kind of a gapping gap between the actual roadway of 101 and that intersection of 101 and Lake Susan Drive and the homes so from our standpoint it feels a little weird and we struggle and that's one of the reasons we wanted to put some columns, you know pillars to make it look like there's an identity that this is really a place here. You're not just seeing a gap of right-of-way there that's mowed by the State so we really struggle with how far back that neighborhood is from that road. And granted it's a constraint in some way because it's loud but there's so much space there that it is somewhat of an obstacle in terms of people trying to figure out visually what am I seeing here? What's going on here? Who owns this land? So we really see no impact to anybody for a variance along 101 and Lake Susan Drive to the 25 feet. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: Is there also a request for the 25 feet on Waters Edge Drive or is that at the 50 feet? Paul Heuer: I'd have to ask staff. Aller: I think it's all the way around isn't it? It's 25 all the way around as I understand it. M Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 AI-Jaff. The setback along. Madsen: Waters Edge Drive. Does that also require a variance to be 25 feet? Paul Heuer: Is that from 30 to 25 along Waters Edge? AI-Jaff: From 30 to 25, collector streets, collector roads would have to maintain a 50 foot setback. Madsen: And is a collector road Waters Edge Drive? AI-Jaff: Waters Edge is a local street. It's not a collector so it is a 30. Paul Heuer: So Waters Edge is from 30 to 25. Madsen: Okay. Paul Heuer: So if I could add one more thing, excuse me. So when we started laying out this development one option was for us to make use of Waters Edge Drive and have driveways right off of there. When you have driveways right off of there that's where you get the standard 30 foot setbacks so you have sufficient room for cars parked in the driveway and maybe a sidewalk since sometimes there's sidewalks. In this case at the urging of staff we agreed, the whole neighborhood would look a whole lot better if you did not see garages from the perimeter. A row of garages so instead we pushed all the garages to the interior so you don't need the space anymore between the right-of-way line of Waters Edge Drive and the homes. And we do have a 25 foot setback we're asking for. Some people may not choose the option of a sunroom in which case it increases a bit so it varies depending on the options that are chosen but we would like to have that opportunity to have sunrooms in the rear. Madsen: Thank you. Paul Heuer: You're welcomed. Tietz: Then the sunroom would encroach into the 25 foot zone. Paul Heuer: No. Tietz: No? Paul Heuer: We have designed it so that sunrooms would never encroach. There are 10 units. Tietz: So then your standard property, your building is actually further back than the 25 feet? 50 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Paul Heuer: Yes. Tietz: So your setback from the road is greater than 25 feet yet you're asking for a 25 foot setback. Is that to allow for future sunrooms? Paul Heuer: Yeah. Not future. What we found, we just started selling this product in Plymouth recently. It's the only neighborhood we've been selling it and we've been really surprised that the percentage of people buying the sunroom option is really high. You know typically this is a first time homebuyer so they don't have the excess funds to buy the options but they've been loving the sunrooms so much that it's been a 40 to 60 percent option rate so we would like to offer that option to as many people as possible. Many won't entertain that option in which case the setback is likely to be around 35 feet. Some will in which case it would be 25 feet. Tietz: So on this Sheet L-I showing a typical layout of 4 units, 5 units and 6 units, because it's saw toothed, they're staggered, the deepest unit would never be even with it's sunroom would never, or porch or whatever would never be closer than 25 feet, is that accurate? Because otherwise we're talking about variances in the future. Paul Heuer: That's accurate. No variances in the future. Tietz: So in reality your building line is probably 30 to 35 feet currently and this document would be 30 to 35 feet back from the property line. Paul Heuer: The 25 foot is a minimum so it will ultimately vary from probably 25 to 38 feet if they don't. Tietz: But then some of those folks might not be able to put a screen porch on because it's built right to the 25 foot setback. Is that accurate? Paul Heuer: So we have 10 of the 82 units that they cannot have the option of the sunroom. Tietz: Okay, because they would be built to the setback. Paul Heuer: Yes. Tietz: Okay, thank you. Aller: Additional questions? Follow up. Comments. Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Well one more question. I don't know if this is for Sharmeen or Kate. Aller: Ask away and we'll find out. 51 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Tietz: Is it, is there a potential mix of setback that potentially on Waters it's a deeper setback than the rest of the development. Proposed development area. AI-Jaff: That is definitely an option. Tietz: Is that possible? AI-Jaff: It is an option yes. Tietz: And that would probably impact his development. He may lose a unit or two because it starts to push back but in looking at the plan you guys would have to figure that out but is that something to consider? Would that be a viable alternative to have a deeper setback on Waters? Well you know is that, I'm asking technically from the city's standpoint is that possible? Aanenson: Of course anything's an option. Al-Jaff: Yeah. Tietz: Okay. Would that work? Paul Heuer: We haven't looked at it. It scares me enough that I think the impact would be great but I don't know. Tietz: There's a nice little grove of black walnuts on that site too. Paul Heuer: We're trying to save a number of them. Tietz: The 3 along the street. Aller: Additional comments. Questions. Motions. Weick: I'll comment. Allen. Commissioner Weick. Weick: It might help explain the way I vote later. Maybe not but I think it's a fantastic development. I actually approve of the use of the space. The design of the buildings. The water considerations and even the variance all the way around. However I was actually thinking when you said the land speaks, I was actually thinking the same thing as I looked at the picture on the site and I actually see, I see homes along 212. I see homes right along Waters Edge Drive as well. Along those properties and I think it's reasonable for those homeowners to expect that land across the street to be a similar type of use and design and unfortunately I don't think this is and 52 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 so I'm actually not in favor of rezoning. I'm in favor of everything else because I think it's an awesome development. I just don't think this is the right spot for it. I'm just not in favor of rezoning it. I also would realize that that doesn't guarantee that a future use of this land is exactly as the neighbors or I would want. I'm not implying that. I'm just saying based on what I see today I don't see this fitting. Paul Heuer: Chairman could I make a point? Aller: Yes please. Paul Heuer: Could we go back to the slide showing the future, the land uses? That one. So when we first looked at the site we saw 3 different zonings or guidance on the property. You can see the medium density on the far northeast sliver. Some low density kind of on the northwest part and the higher density and kind of a small sliver again on the southern part of the north part as well as the whole southern property and when we look at trying to do something like that it's highly impractical and I'm not blaming anybody. We have to draw lines sometimes on maps. That's just the way it is but nobody would ever of course develop this with those 3 different zones on the north side so all along we looked at this as this would have to be a blended community. A blended zoning so when we looked at the low density, the medium density and the high density we realized that the only real solution here if this property's ever going to develop is to have something that falls somewhere in the middle and that's what we proposed. Initially we were actually looking at a 3 story row home building and a number of things including the height and the fear that it might be a little imposing, especially for single family homes to the west and the north, so we pulled back from that application and changed it to something we felt was really, really compatible which is a simple 2 story row home unit that is still only 82 units out of the 99 that really are allowed but really fitting and looking like a single family home to a large extent so that's how we really got to the point that we're at here today and honestly when I look at this map I can't come up with a better solution than what we came up with. Yusuf. May I ask? Aller: Sure. Yusuf. May I ask Sharmeen to please explain the total number of units allowed and how that plays with the zoning? So I'm referring to page 6. The table on page 6. This one. AI-Jaff: Okay. So what we have is a mix of densities permitted by the land use plan. The residential low density portion of the site consists of 4.9 acres at 4 units per acre. That would give us 20 units. The medium density portion consists of 2.059 acres at 8 units per acre maximum so that's the 16 units and then the residential high density or mixed use that we see on the plan, along the northern portion we have 1.13 acres at 16 units per acre. That translates to 18 units. The southern portion is 2.8 acres, translates to 45 units at 16. The total number of units 53 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 permitted is 99 units on that site. One thing I do need to point out is the portion of the high density along the southern portion includes vacation of some right-of-way. Without it they would be at 95 units. They are still below the maximum permitted by ordinance. By land use. Yusuf: So thank you. So the reason why I wanted you to go over it again is just looking at the north parcel it adds up to 54 and it does look a little dense when you just look at it as blocks and I thought we talked about 64. So that's why I was hoping you could just clarify. AI-Jaff: Absolutely. One of the other things that we looked at within a planned unit development, you have the ability to transfer densities. We looked at the best layout possible within that development and that is the layout that is presented to you. One of the things that could potentially happen is where you have the concentrations of the mixed use, these units could become apartment buildings. That's what we're trying to avoid. We are trying to disperse the density within the development. Again that medium, they are below the medium density of maximum of 8 units per acre and it's that transition zone between the high density and the low density development of single family homes. Yusuf. Thank you. AI-Jaff: Sure. Aller. Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: So Sharmeen if I'm understanding this correctly, so one option would have been to put a second apartment building next to the first one which would back up to single family homes and the density would, the zoning would support that. That wouldn't be very great for those single family homes so rather than, so then you transferred some of that density to the north site. Al-Jaff: Yes, that's exactly what we did. Madsen: But then some people who were thinking that only single family homes were going to be there, it's now row homes because of that transfer, is that correct? AI-Jaff: Yes, correct. Madsen: Okay, thank you. Aller: And the properties within the district which would require a 50 percent open space or in the medium density in the north as well. So they could cluster against Waters Edge and leave the balance of their property on the other side vacant. AI-Jaff That's correct. 54 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Aller: Okay. Paul Heuer: Chairman? Aller: Yes. Paul Heuer: There's one other complication. I think one of the reasons this property has not developed for some time is the shoreland district and by complication I mean typically when you have to have 50 percent open space most cities don't allow that to be back yards of single family homes because a homeowner owns that property. They can go out and dig holes. They can put fire pits in. They can add impervious surface pretty much at free will. Apartment complexes or association maintained row homes like this have an association that owns and controls that property. That is acceptable to the DNR and most cities in terms of shoreland districts. Single family homes can't be controlled so most cities will not count the back yards of single family homes as open space to accommodate that 50 percent requirement so that's a real sticking point that I think a number of people came across as they've looked at this property. Apartment complex, you know the City didn't want. Single family home can't work because of the shoreland district so this is really all that's left. Something mid density that has an association maintained open space. Weick: Is that true in Chanhassen? Aanenson: I would just comment on that. It was under contract for quite a while with a twin home project. It couldn't work. The developer couldn't make it work for density for profit for just to get the layout in the shoreland. Weick: Okay. Aanenson: We didn't look at it with a mix of single family. It was pure twin homes trying to spread that. It's been under contract for a number of different projects. This is the furthest one that's. Weick: Okay. Tietz: Kate is some of that driven by the cost of the land? Aanenson: Of course. Of course. Tietz: So yeah, at some point. Aanenson: But also the goal of the city is not to, their first choice was not to put an apartment building there. 55 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Tietz: Yeah, no I understand that but obviously some projects don't come to fruition simply because the economics don't work and the cost of land versus construction. Aanenson: Agreed. Tietz: And then the sale price. Aanenson: Correct. And expectation for just the loss of density by doing a twin home project only and not being able to pencil that. Tietz: Okay. Aller: Additional comments. Questions as we work through this. Does anybody want to make a motion one way or another? Is there more information or other questions that people would like to have presented before you make a decision? Audience: Can you hear from the public anymore or not? Aller: The public hearing is closed ma'am. Thank you though. Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: A comment would be that you know it's difficult if you want to preserve the value of the homes and as it's currently zoned an apartment building that close would likely lower the value of the homes more than a townhome development so by transferring the density it does seem to be a good option. I'm not sure I like the variance for the 25 to 30 feet. It would be nice if you could at least move it back a little bit from the residential homes to the 30 feet. Aller: Do you feel strongly enough about that to make a motion of some sort? Randall: I can make the motion. Ready? Aller. Please, Commissioner Randall. Randall: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Planning Case 17-12 for West Park as shown on the plans received May 18, 2017, subject to conditions of approval. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the site for the construction of 82 townhomes for the Planning Case 17-12 for West Park as shown on the plans received May 18, 2017 subject to conditions of approval. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the variance requested by, for Planning Case 17-12 that allows for a 25 foot setback from Waters Edge Drive, Lake Susan Drive, Highway 101 and as shown in plans received May 18, 2017 subject to conditions of approval. The Planning Commission recommends approval of rezoning the property located at the southeast of Waters Edge Drive, west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Highway 212, bisected by Lake Susan Drive with the approximate area of 9.8 acres from Residential Single Family and Planned Unit Development to Planned Unit Development 56 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Residential incorporating design standards. Planning Case 17-12 subject to the conditions of approval an adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. Alter: So I have a motion by Commissioner Randall. Do I have a second? Undestad: Second. Alter: Having a motion and a second. Any further comments? Madsen: So if I disagree with a portion of one of those do I just vote no overall? Alter: You would vote no or you can request that an amendment to his motion be made at this point. So you can request that the motion be amended to deal with terms and conditions that you could like to see. Madsen: Okay I request a motion to amend it to allow a 30 foot setback from Waters Edge Drive. Alter: So your motion would be to amend. Madsen: The variance request. Alter: Amend that variance request portion of the original motion and do I have a. Aanenson: I think the rules of order would be the person that made the motion would have to accept the friendly amendment. Alter: Is it accepted? Randall: Yeah we can allow that. Just kidding. Madsen: Yeah maybe we should do it separate? Randall: But is that going to be a problem I mean if they can't move forward with this at a 30 foot that's going to be an issue with the variance, correct? Alter: Yeah because your motion references plans. Randall: Yeah. Weick: It would just mean that some of the properties along Waters Edge would not be able to have additions. 57 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Aller: Correct. That's what technically it would as it stands. Weick: Which may or may not be economically feasible. I don't know. Aller: So you're not accepting? Randall: We'll accept it. That's fine. I don't know what kind of an impact it's going to have on it though without going back into it. Yusuf: Can we make the motions as we have them but separate? Can we break them up? Aller: I don't think we can because the motion. Aanenson: There's a motion on the floor and it's been amended so you should probably or he'll have to withdraw it. Randall: Just vote on it and then. Aller: So let's just vote on it. Randall: And then someone else can make another motion correct? No? Weick: I don't think so. Randall: Let's just vote on it then. Aller: Okay so we're voting on the motion as amended and accepted by the author as an amendment. Randall: Correct. Aller: And do I have a second to that? Would you like to re -second the new motion? So there is basically a new motion before us and that motion changes the setback requirement to 30 feet on Waters Edge Drive. So the question is would someone like to second it in which case it's voted on. If there's no second then it would die for lack of a second. Aanenson: Mr. Chair Mark Undestad seconded the motion so. Aller: He seconded the original. Aanenson: Yeah so he would yeah. 58 " Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Alter: But we have a new motion before us. And so what I'm hearing or not hearing is going to result in this, your present motion dying for lack of a second. So that motion fails for lack of a second and then we're still at square one. Randall: So are we back at the original motion? Alter: If you'd like to make that motion again. Randall: So re -read the whole thing? Alter: So let's just say if you want to make the motion that you're making the motion as previously stated. Randall: I'll make the motion as previously stated. Alter: Without amendment. Randall: Without amendment. Yusuf. I'll second that. Alter: And we have a new second by Commissioner Yusuf. So any further discussion or requests for amendments or, seeing none. Randall moved, Yusuf seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Planning Case 17-12 for West Park as shown on the plans received May 18, 2017, subject to conditions of approval: Engineering The existing topographic survey shall include the existing first floor elevations of nearby structures such as 8751 Waters Edge Drive and 721 Lake Susan Drive. 2. Spot elevations shall be shown at the center of proposed driveways at the curb line so the driveway grade can be verified. 3. The backyard drainage on Lot 12 shall be revised to a minimum of 2%. 4. Draintile is required for all lots where stormwater runoff will flow from the back to the front of the property. Draintile shall be shown on the plans between Blocks 11 and 12. 5. The applicant shall work with Carver County to see if the FES from their pond outlet can be combined with the county's culvert to eliminate the low spot adjacent to this site. 6. The plan shall show EOF locations and elevation for all basins on site. 59 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 7. The applicant shall submit a finalized, signed soil boring report. 8. Top and bottom wall elevations shall be shown on the grading plan. 9. This wall shall be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association (HOA). 10. The development plans shall call out the material of the retaining wall. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: smooth face, poured in place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber. 11. Boulder walls shall not be taller than six feet. 12. As an existing public trail is located within the vacation area, the applicant shall grant a trail easement to the city prior to recording the vacation. 13. As existing public utilities are located within the vacation area, the applicant shall grant a drainage and utility easement to the city prior to recording the vacation. 14. The applicant shall have their survey confirm location of all easements with a recent title commitment prior to final plat. 15. The retaining wall and entry monuments are proposed within drainage and utility easements. These elements require an encroachment agreement prior to their construction. 16. The private sidewalks constructed within city right-of-way require an encroachment agreement. 17. All private streets will be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association. 18. The street profiles show changes of grade without the vertical curves. The applicant's engineer shall work with city staff to either remove these grade changes or incorporate vertical curves into the profile. 19. The applicant shall include the horizontal alignment tabulation for all street in the plans prior to final plat. 20. Street lights shall be installed at the intersections with public streets. This light shall be owned by the city and maintained by MVEC (Minnesota Valley Electric Company). A $300 fee shall be collected with the development contract for electricity costs for the first year of operation. 21. The driveway for Lot 1, Block 2 of the southern parcel must be adjusted to meet Stonegate Road at a 90 degree angle. 22. The net SWMP Fee due at the time of final plat of the northern parcel is $59,997.66. 23. The net SWMP Fee due at the time of final plat of the southern parcel is $20,509.89. W F Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 24. For 64 units on the northern parcel, the sanitary partial fee is $44,224.00 and the water partial fee is $137,408.00. 25. For 18 units on the southern parcel, the sanitary partial fee is $12,438.00 and the water partial fee is $38,646.00. 26. The remaining hook-up fees will be due with the building permit at the rate in effect at that time. PARK AND TRAIL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for the West Park Residential Subdivision. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per multi-family/apartment dwelling, the total park fees will be $311,600 2. (82 units x $3,800 each). All voted in favor, except Commissioners Weick and Madsen who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 5 to 2. Randall moved, Yusuf seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the site plan for the construction of 82 townhouses for Planning Case 17-12 for West Park, as shown on the plans received May 18, 2017, subject to conditions of approval; Engineering: The Engineering Department recommends approval of the final plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit the full SWPPP document to the City for review prior to grading on site. 2. The plans shall identify the areas intended for stockpiling materials on site during construction. 3. No parking signage shall be installed at all turnarounds to keep them open for public safety access. 4. The plan shall be adjusted to provide sufficient length of roadway for Lot 6, Block 7 to turn onto their street from their driveway. 5. All private street signage shall comply with the MN Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. oil Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 6. The parking lot near Block 13 must be revised to have 9-foot wide stalls, even at their narrowest point. 7. All parking lots shall be revised to provide a 26-foot drive aisle and 18-foot long spaces. 8. The parking lot off Stonegate Road shall be revised to provide a 10-foot by 26 foot turnaround. 9. The sidewalk and pedestrian ramps shall be constructed per the Chanhassen Standard Detail Plates. 10. All sidewalks internal to the site shall be owned and maintained by the HOA. 11. The sidewalk connection parallel to Lake Susan Drive shall be owned and maintained by the City. 12. The HOA shall be responsible for snow maintenance on sidewalks adjacent to HOA property. 13. To reduce future maintenance needs for the City, SAN MH 8 location shall be adjusted to eliminate the need for SAN MH 7. 14. The applicant shall revise plans to call out the size of proposed water main. 15. A gate valve shall be added to the plan between Block 5 and 8 prior to construction. 16. The plan shall be revised to remove CB 400, as the adjacent upstream catchbasin will replace the one removed with construction of the Blue Heron Drive access. 17. The applicant's engineer shall add a column to the stormwater pipe/structure table to list the velocities of the pipes. 18. The stormwater pipe sizes shall be revised to no smaller than 15-inch diameter, the minimum size allowed for ease of future maintenance. 19. Stormwater pipe within the development shall be privately owned and maintained. 20. The storm sewer/water main crossing near CB MH 702 may be in conflict. The applicant's engineer shall verify this when the utility profiles are drafted. 21. The applicant shall meet the minimum requirements for stormwater set forth in City Code §9-VII and requirements of the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District. 22. The applicant must obtain a permit from RPBCWD prior to grading the site. 23. The applicant is responsible for obtaining permits from applicable regulatory agencies (MDH, MPCA, MnDOT, etc.) prior to construction. Building Conditions: 62 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Accessibility must be provided to all portions of the development and a percentage of the units may also be required to be accessible or adaptable in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. Further information is needed to determine these requirements. 2. Buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system. For the purposes of this requirement property lines do not constitute separate buildings. 3. The buildings will be required to be designed by an architect and engineer as determined by the Building Official. 4. The developer must submit a list of proposed street name(s) to the Fire Marshal and Building Official for review and approval prior to final plat of the property. 5. Demolition permits must be obtained before demolishing any structures on the site. Application for such permits must include hazardous substances investigation and proposed mitigation reports. 6. A final grading plan and geotechnical (soils evaluation) report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits will be issued. 7. Walls and projections within 5 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire - resistive construction. 8. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 9. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 10. The developer and/or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Fire Marshal 1. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. Street signs (temporary allowed) shall be installed prior to building permits being issued. Fire Chief must approve signage. 3. Prior to combustible construction fire hydrants shall be made serviceable. 63 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 4. Prior to combustible home construction fire apparatus access roads capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus shall be made serviceable. 5. Relocate the fire hydrant on Stonegate road eighty (80) feet to the west. (At the intersection of Stonegate and Stonegate) 6. On Eagle View Road add a fire hydrant between block 5 and block 6. 7. In order to avoid duplicating street names, submit new proposed street names to Fire Chief and Building Official for review and approval. Planning 1. Approval of this site plan is contingent upon approval of the final plat for Gateway North. 2. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement. 3. The building shall comply with the Planned Unit Development building setback requirements" All voted in favor, except Commissioners Weeck and Madsen who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 5 to 2. Randall moved, Yusuf seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the variance request for Planning Case 17-12 to allow a 25-foot setback from Waters Edge Drive, Lake Susan Drive, and Highway 101, as shown on the plans received May 18, 2017, subject to conditions of approval: Approval of the Variance is contingent upon approval of the Site Plan and Subdivision applications for Planning Case 17-12. All voted in favor, except Commissioners Weick and Madsen who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 5 to 2. Randall moved, Yusuf seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of rezoning the property located at the southeast of Waters Edge Drive, west of Great Plains Boulevard, north of Highway 212 and bisected by Lake Susan Drive with an approximate area of 9.8 acres from Residential Single Family and Planned Unit Development to Planned Unit Development -Residential, incorporating design standards: L"AA &3AtZIXA lQ Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 PUD DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a RESIDENTIAL PUD. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive development. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to four, five, and six plex complexes. • The total number of units for the entire site may not exceed 99 units. C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Boundary Building/ Parking Setbacks feet Highway 101 25/10 Highway 212 25/25 Northerly Project Property Line 25/25 Westerly Project Property Line 25/20 Internal Project property lines 0 /0 Hard Surface Coverage -Residential 50 % Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height 35 or 3 stories, whichever is less * parking setbacks maybe reduced to 10 feet if full screening is provided. d. Residential Building Materials and Design Buildings and site design shall comply with design standards outlined in Article XXIIL General Supplemental Regulations, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. I. All units shall have access onto an interior private street. 2. A design palette shall be approved for the entire project. The palette shall include colors for siding, shakes, shutters, shingles, brick, stone, etc. 3. All foundation walls shall be screened by landscaping or retaining walls. 65 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 4. All adjoining units must exhibit different exterior design features and color. e. Site Landscaping and Screening The intent of this section is to improve the appearance of vehicular use areas and property abutting public rights -of -way; to require buffering between different land uses; and to protect, preserve and promote the aesthetic appeal, character and value of the surrounding neighborhoods; to promote public health and safety through the reduction of noise pollution, air pollution, visual pollution and glare. The landscaping standards shall provide for screening for visual impacts associated with a given use, including but not limited to parking areas, utility boxes, unadorned building massing, etc. 2. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces, except for the fire pit area, shall be landscaped, rockscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 3. Undulating berms, shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. 4. Native species shall be incorporated into site landscaping, whenever possible. f. Street Furnishings Benches, trash receptacles, planters and other street furnishings should be of design and materials consistent with the character of the area. Wherever possible, street furnishings should be consolidated to avoid visual clutter and facilitate pedestrian movement. g. Signage The intent of this section is to establish an effective means of communication in the development, maintain and enhance the aesthetic environment, to improve pedestrian and traffic safety, to minimize the possible adverse effect of signs on nearby public and private property, and to enable the fair and consistent enforcement of these sign regulations. It is the intent of this section, to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community by regulating signs that are intended to communicate to the public, and to use signs which meet the city's goals: a. Preserve and promote civic beauty, and prohibit signs which detract from this objective because of size, shape, height, location, condition, cluttering or illumination; b. Ensure that signs do not create safety hazards; Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 c. Ensure that signs are designed, constructed, installed and maintained in a manner that does not adversely impact public safety or unduly distract motorists; d. Preserve and protect property values; e. Ensure signs that are in proportion to the scale of, and are architecturally compatible with, the principal structures; g.l. Monument Sign: One monument sign shall be permitted at the entrances to the development off of Lake Susan Drive. These signs shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than five feet in height. These signs shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. g.2. Sin Design and Permit Requirements: a. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material and height throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. b. All signs require a separate sign permit. h. Lighting 1. Lighting for the interior of the development shall be consistent throughout the development. Fixtures with decorative natural colored pole shall be used throughout the development in parking and street lighting. Decorative, pedestrian scale lighting shall be used in the fire pit area and sidewalk areas and may be used in parking lot areas. 2. Light fixtures should be kept to a pedestrian scale (12 to 18 feet). 3. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than '/2 candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. Residential Parking shall comply with city code requirements. All voted in favor, except for Commissioners Weick and Madsen who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 5 to 2. Randall moved, Yusuf seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 17-12 subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached 67 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 Findings of Fact and Decision. All voted in favor, except for Commissioners Weick and Madsen who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 5 to 2. Aller: So the motion carries. Aanenson: This item does go to the Planning Commission on July, City Council excuse me. City Council on July l0a'. Aller: And it will go to City Council on July 10`s. At this point it is 10:00. Our by-laws state that we will go til 10:30 except for longer hearings so let's take a 5 minute recess to let individuals clear the room a little bit and we'll come back and hit item 3. We are in recess. (The Planning Commission took a 5 minute recess at this point in the meeting.) Aller: Thank you. We'll go ahead and continue with tonight's Planning Commission meeting and we have our last public hearing of the night and it's item 3 on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARING: VENUE/ALDI — UNITED PROPERTIES: REOUEST FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING AND A 19,000 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING (ALDI) WITH VARIANCES AND A REGISTERED LAND SURVEY FOR THEATERS AND HIGH TIMBER LOUNGE. APPLICANT/OWNER: CHANHASSEN FRONTIER LLC. Generous: Thank you Chairman Aller, commissioners. Pleasure to finally be up here today. Last week I was on vacation so it's a little different. This is a site plan review and a registered land survey that's going to be recommended for this development. There is a variance included in this. It's because of the existing driveway on the north side of the property. It's tied into the properties both to the east and the west and the design is going to remain the same and so they don't meet the new standards for our parking lot but they would be keeping what they have in place but technically because they are changing the use of the property we had to notice this as a variance. The applicant is Chanhassen Frontier, LLC. This is the public hearing with the Planning Commission. This item goes to the City Council on July I &. The property's located at 525 West 7811' Street. It's to the west of the Chanhassen Dinner Theater and east of the hotel building and the High Timber Lounge. It's an existing retail building with some businesses or office units on the second floor of the development. I should note that as part of this we received 4 emails and I provided copies for the Planning Commission. These will become part of the public records. The project consists of 3 parcels. They're not, only one of them is platted. The others are metes and bounds. Or 2 of them are parts of plats and one is a metes and bounds description. This property is located in the heart of downtown. There are multiple businesses in the area and has easy accessibility to other commercial areas as well as residential and government uses. To the southwest of this building is the park and ride site for Southwest Transit. The development would have easy pedestrian access to this. Primarily access to the Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 20, 2017 property is from West 78' Street. It has a shared access with the Chanhassen Dinner Theater on the east side, northeast side and then another access with the hotel on the west at the intersection. It also has access via Market Street from the south. So which has both access to Market Street and Great Plains Boulevard. The request before you is a site plan review for 134 units, 6 story apartment building and the one story, 19,000 square foot retail building which is to be leased by Aldi with a variance for the existing drive aisles on the north side of the property. It's also a request for a land survey, registered land use creating 2 parcels out of the existing 3 parcels that are on the site. Normally we would handle this administratively but registered land surveys are required to go through the hearing process that we have for subdivisions. We are actually reducing the number of lots that are out there with this development. The building is stepped back from West 78's Street. It's 145 feet to the front of the apartment building. The commercial portion of the building is a one story, 16 foot tall building. The apartment buildings have 5 stories on the north side and then they're stepped back to the 6 story which would be on the south side. The property is guided for commercial land use. It's zoned central business district. Within the central business district retail uses and multi -family dwellings are permitted uses. The central business district does not have any maximum hard surface coverage. However as part of this project they are going to be providing improvements to the City's surface water management to treat the stormwater that is coming off the site. No maximum site coverage and also there's no minimum setback requirements for any of the uses within the CBD. This is our most permissive district if it will. It permits both commercial and residential uses and it has no restrictions on building height, building site coverage, any of that. Pedestrian access is being enhanced as part of this proposed development. The site plan variance again maintains the drive aisle widths along this north property, parking lot area and the parking lot stalls along on the very north. These are supposed to be 18 feet and it's 17 foot deep stalls. A 26 foot aisle. This is a 25 foot aisle that's existing in place. But then it jumps over to 18 %2 feet as you go farther south and then this portion would comply with city ordinances. It does tie in with the parking lot to the hotel and then access into the Dinner Theater site. Again the residential component consists of 134 units. A six story building. The commercial component is a 19,000 square foot retail building. Okay building materials are shown on page 5 of the staff report. The commercial building has a first story is a tan colored brick. Tan colored brick with the faux cement board, wood material and then it has also the white metal panels that are on the lower right corner of the view on your screen. They're proposing to have architectural graphics on the building to help provide additional interest to the east of the entrance and then also on the west side adjacent to the parking lot. And here you can see this is the faux wood material. The lower level and around the side in the back is where the tan brick materials are and then this is one of the architectural panels as well as on the west elevation. Here you can see the loading dock actually faces West 78m Street but it drops down approximately 4 feet. There's a 10 foot elevation drop between the north side of the property and the south side. Underneath the commercial building will be the parking area for the residences and then the registered land survey is to create the lot area for the commercial building on top of the residential garages and so it's both a 3 dimensional description that will be developed as part of that. However we need to wait until we get the final building in place so they can actually survey and come up with the description for that exact location. It's basically where the commercial building will be and so that's why we're giving it preliminary approval now. When they get the final description in there then council will approve the final registered land survey and we'll have that recorded at Carver County. The residential part of the building consists of multiple building materials, projections and recesses 3% tl-QZ CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Community far Life-ProvidingforTodayand PlanningforTamorrow August 12, 2017 Mr. Paul Heuer, Director of Land Planning & Entitlement Pulte Homes 7500 Office Ridge Circle, Suite 325 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Final Plat, Development Contract and construction plans -Planning Case 2017-12—West Park Association This letter is to confirm that on July 24, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motions: Subdivision "The City Council approves the final plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3' Addition, replatting 8.64 Acres into one lot as shown in plans dated received January 22, 2016, subject to the following conditions: Park and Trail Conditions: Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for the West Park Residential Subdivision. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per multi-family/apartment dwelling, the total park fees will be $243,200 (64 units x $3,800 each). Engineering Conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with Carver County to see if the FES from their pond outlet can be combined with the county's culvert to eliminate the low spot adjacent to this site. 2. The plan shall show EOF locations and elevation for all basins on site. 3. All retaining walls shall be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association (HOA). PH 952.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227. 1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 Mr. Paul Heuer Letter of Approval — West Park August 15, 2017 Page 2 of 3 4. The development plans shall call out the material of the retaining wall. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: smooth face, poured in place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber. 5. As existing public utilities are located within the vacation area, the applicant shall grant a drainage and utility easement to the City concurrent to recording the vacation. 6. The applicant shall have their survey confirm location of all easements with a recent title commitment prior to final plat. 7. The retaining wall and entry monuments are proposed within drainage and utility easements. These elements require an encroachment agreement prior to their construction. 8. The private sidewalks constructed within city right-of-way require an encroachment agreement. 9. All private streets will be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association. 10. Street lights shall be installed at the intersections with public streets. This light shall be owned by the city and maintained by MVEC (Minnesota Valley Electric Company). A $300 fee shall be collected with the development contract for electricity costs for the first year of operation. 11. The net SWMP Fee due at the time of final plat of the northern parcel is $53,237.19. 12. For 64 units on the northern parcel, the sanitary partial fee is $44,224.00 and the water partial fee is $137,408.00. 13. The remaining hook-up fees will be due with the building permit at the rate in effect at that time. Building Official Conditions: 1. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. Mr. Paul Heuer Letter of Approval — West Park August 15, 2017 Page 3 of 3 Fire Marshall Conditions: 1. In order to avoid duplicating street names, submit new proposed street names to Fire Chief and Building Official for review and approval. Development Contract "The City Council approves the development contract for West Park." Construction plans "The City Council approves the plans and specifications dated received July 14, 2017 for West Park subject to the conditions of subdivision and site plan" VACATION "The City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of public highway dedicated on the recorded plat of GATEWAY NORTH as described in Exhibit A." In order to finalize the vacation, the Council resolution must be recorded at Carver County concurrent with the plat of West Park. Please refer to the enclosed checklist which stipulates all of the submittal requirements for recording the final plat and associated documents. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (952) 227-1134 or by email at saljaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner ec: Stephanie Smith, Project Engineer Vanessa Strong, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director Chad Onsgard, Director of Development gAp1an\2017 planning cases\l7-12 west park - pultc (Ungelhut0approval letter final plat.dmx ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT RECORDING The following items are required to be submitted for recording of the following plat and associated documents: WEST PARK Two signed Final Plat Mylars ("Official Cpp 'and"CityCo ') Three 1" = 200' scale paper copy of the final plat (for Carver County) One, 1" = 200' scale mylar reductions of the final plat One, 1" = 200' scale mylar reductions of the final plat (with street names and lot and block numbers only) Mortgage Holder Consent to Plat Quit Claim/Warranty deed (if deeding an outlot to the City) Fees as detailed in the Development Contract: $0.00 Letter of Credit Digital copy of the final plat in Axf and .tif formats (.pdf compatible) in Carver County coordinates Digital copy of the HydroCAD model. Homeowner's association documents. The following must be done before the plat can be filed: Current year property taxes must be paid in full and any delinquent property taxes or green acres taxes must also be paid. A copy of the title commitment or deed must be provided if the developer has closed on the property recently since County records will not likely be updated. Watershed Permit I B6 0.3N Ce9 R, 98j4 8 s a 9r9,9 �00 4 M 0 C 4� O •Q tl N r < 2 e7 1jG8 O o� 1p 6a tea, g�N 8006 , j r 4 C 2Q „ ° 4 '12 Z a °r>'q6�� 98 88 081,E OUTLOT F -- 10.88 rn DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 6� --- C6 OVER ALL OF OUTLOT F S23°35'25"E- p114 L�89.37 C'------ a 14.08 \\ 10101P.Q 1- 3 S°73'pV C" B9 -- NOT TANGENT 1 60 S45°11'1811 -------- A 8 42 N \ So o o OJ `37.70 ° 3 0'is` °00'00„\ oWs \\ /'?OIV1 \ N 29 A2 y0 ° so° 0,. T o ^� SryO g211 .O �2• y� (� G.c ry Jv 10. O r9 /� 02 rn ai(�` NA �2225 N o �� M� 2 2 4 00 Qg3 'Oo° N !� - s\ No N c' 9 3 .� Np ° I S 229 0 0 --q - N ° N \\ p206 .0 •00 S2 yp o w --_� - \c, o rnS cPrn° N �z9 co ° vo• 3 4, 0.3N LO o .� > 00 s 2 E m \AWN A 4 06� NA O 9\ rn� NA 222gp2 .0 , \ 0, N N29 d2 yo O° v p`='W WoS oO S 70 ¢O ° , n i / i i r- -r- , r- n , I n, n i i / , A 'o`,p •31 '0000 5 N so m Zg rvr /I/ l i / 1 / I-- l I --I r-- rvl /I/ / / / j� ,.Ir W \ rp 9 y0 Na 2�70 NS ,. v v v , / - 1- i , r , , _ I v v v I i - T qN/ Ib AA P l `°v d20a�60. °0 v ro, v 9 �$ S 7050 0001 �wr va °0 1 l l r- - _ �- - l i / a^ / Q - n C, O 2 ww \ „ .� Z_ -i- O. Q W� �^a \\ = N' C\j1 wa` ?wo` v S22 � 29'. °O .A'O6°9 \- 0 S22°3118"E l N O 7i i i, _ o \Z cS \\ 18.67 g1o°21'072.50 Z "E \\ rn \ N19'12'58"W__ rn 6 cs? o w° CO m N\ 18.67 '� OUTLOT C eb a5� °O N N a+oWo\ N10°21'07W 72.50 "33\W N I o 507„E DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT aR7,5o c°y 2y '00 co w9 S10° N OVER ALL OF OUTLOT C \ ? 1 .,9 °W, / 12.50 P y� \ s0 5 �a0 >S C; 0� 4 0 501°23'31°E--� bra O O bra 0o aQ6`ry / 0 z 20.57 '` 0 5 2' iBJ j8 n \� 72.50 0 'w0 m o 0 0 $10°21107 Eya oo QOO 4 b bhp OO 8°O .0 3N 3 5 Lo 2 0 N ro Z 72.50 5 % / VPRIE c3? o Nt0°21'07"W w a `� 52 O 72.50 wa _ cOJn , 71'07"E N o w 0 S .0° - N 00 O S, So g8° - b1. 50 ? 2. 72.50 o ,qa• b0 c<`S �8, 5 �2' 60 4-1 O c''o° o 1.110°21'07 2 b5 d> 1 SO O 50 w 00 107„E b'\ 00 72 Q o .eL o $10°2 50 N tea'. rya''SOc°F 5 12 1 2`'0 cY \ G z N 4 6J y 72. ' Y°O N p O \ P O o N10°21'07'Ml nw N boo (J rO,G o0 / ¢. a °' ° z A N o m 2 ?s 's, 2rO• ' �� v tip b"`b \�\� �(\' .00 0o V� ��, '; 4 \ O \ I w 72.50 p 0 2„ \ 'o b C Z \ o O Sy 3 R=17.70 N \ 725o i O S, o0 26. % °0 \� ah o w Z SAW, °' rL .S S, rL J r' 33 o N10°210T � m cn �1 7050 2 O 6` O 0'g0°00 O° � � Pf,R P��,oa 6 bF. °O � w an w. A 10°21'0T E \ mod°CAC 0 W� G 0. h , 72. m w I crr rn cn �` m d r b• 2 0 rc, ,/ S P b'` 6 �b `'v try 1 m o N 5 o I /s m O m, $ 2Q so sF 2 h� �P P h D PS S ti n -1 o 72.50 I o �. m I m 4 .Z Sj 5 00 1bh b,`b \�y 0^^O \ 00 i n -i-ya 121 n, n _ Q v \ o N10°21'07"W \ o 0 10°21'07°E 8i a a a'` \\ OJ `1� a�0 `°s / & I J c� \ \ m o 50 N w F` a Q pF ,fib 1 ' SF o I Z 70. /] a e° m o I 2 4 b h 3 1 z 'L 3 Y o w a oo P \,v b'� bh rS ° ^� F0 a� �2. 1 •00 sip` / z z ~ W 72.50 N \ w Nv rn SO 20 PO �R P \, b ?0 rS, 'T, N10°21`07' o w o $10°21'07"E o �P\\S OJ Cab` 1 ayS\ ° A by v i i i .00 �'I B° c°y 3 yC'i °O /__Sii°O6'36"W t ]' -� N 1 m 70.50 n o, b 0o r b 28.50 CO co p� o O i °h^ �. bti 60 cry 00 Q Sj 00 b': l W W .0 ,W O , W S48°18'15"W_. �o. .o do S, ^ <3 `'E \ O 1y1p°21'07' oNo 2 , ;7C �^ 0 18.67 \\ aso 2 0'� 1 ° a w ti F 9a 3ry' 2 '00 \ ' B2 " 1 w 72.50 a 0 0 21'01"E , ��. /i o / ° ,�a / o 2 Q o ? y� -� �I W 4z o 0 o $10° / v a '� O a - 0.3N J / °ya 1 o N41°41'45"W_� ,� y0 N 2 0 2 O .� _- 2 O w 70.50 rn / '\ 9a 0 10.67 `, _` �b 10 SO \ 4'v OO �b yo . ipm o N10°21'07'W w -30- N o i i , 6b `'J B m g ti 6oV` sF8° a'0 3�ay+3\ o \ S�Sj 1P 5a ^2. 1 ryy0 L=7.04 T 1 u a o o O L i j w , 1, m 72, s 0 07"E 70. '� o CO h °j W r a b o S� / ° h� 6°'0 \ \ z o rn °' ,,, 50wa b 50 o s, '� 5 O 3 9 a 2t, a ^ z 4 yo e Wrn 9 o N S10° N00°01'33"W 73.17 / / ND o y7 9\ \ 2� q =O p R=85.00 j00 �O 10' \ 0. < / / / i-c ?S j o N10°21,071,W o \� pIII wS ---S89°5627"W II v '! L 13.74 •[� ysS\ oy0 `°� S n .. ., °O N N p o0 18.67 . 0--4 9°15'42" ,�a 9 O i I o 72.50 0 'o L=20.83__ m' C.Brg N85°23'42"W Aso a°b bhp m ., 2 2 2 0 0 0 9g<•q8. 4-10°22'45" -- -- �� 0 O i j 4. 23 O \ i 1� n 4 l��9 O28„ 87 -__/ C.=13.73 b'` ?y S 9� 87°33'36 h 9�' S0 Nb W M 0 21'07"\N I N00°01'33"W ---- C�a� 1 ^ °O 3j'00 L=565 \� 9"' 00. 0 N10° "19 �- R=17.00 ,� / S00°01'33"E 70.50 \ S00°03'26' _ K j00 4(° S1 \\ L 1 - 33 50 N 4p 18.33 rn o o V /' S70°23'43"E '\ d- 72. rn >g° L=26.70-� d: -30- I o o I 34.96 ,gbh, ?Q °o - 2 ,y2 CP \ 5 o 40'26" 0=90,00,001, \ v 4 °b O ay`C\ '00 /� 18.00 �� 9 \\ >` N N N S48'18'15' \ �'�, b� y 2 / o rn rn I -_ S00°01'33"E -� \ 00 10 b"` ,_18.007'1 'S7"W C� (P v N00°Ot'33' W 72.61 I 16.42 O � 00 _ i a� Oy // 18.00 REBAR N \\ W 12.50 ��> - S00°01'33"E 124.00 0 70.50 0 S 1 °'6+ \ �� ( G) #44901 0 � L 9 N10°2107 _ i /26.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 26.00 00 a `3 W W F8j °0 \ / ` \\ ,p r \\ S27°55'16"W / rn o N S00°01'33"E N o W 2 Sy 0 �b<3 I 1 to A W \\ WW ti S, b 1 I. ° I _ L � io o_'\ W 21.38 0 1 ti Z W /y b'` 6 O I \\ \\ t3\ i \1 \N `� -O % N / O O 3 w o 70.50 J o w �� o I' o N y p \� '10• 4 �o!o R=67.00 �\ 0 t0 co ° ``?N OUTLOT F r r v 7 y J o °° O L=32.56 L= 7.42 rs 6� L Oo W 3 3 W J N N 0 2 O N �~ O \`off O +S\ I \ \\ W A / W 3 n 1` N °u`0i ;I W o o ci b6 4=27°50'39 \ L=47.42 O -� 'O `W L L_ 6� W O 1 `-� 2 N rrni, 3 N� 4 N uoi 5 � �� rn rn N S00°01'33"E N rn ti� ?� �� ? ,oa° C.Brg=S34°22'55"W �--N=40°32'53" Q 6o O O O co -J N u°Di N I°i N 0D m r o k° ro m m Z) o co 6' b` C.=32.24 I C.Br S18°58'55' 'r9 v to N 6, N N 'z � •O C� 6. - <'I W m r m r r � o cn z 70.50 z o f _ O I C.=46.43 O cT -- NOT TANGENT m °� z o o 2 �\ 3 R=85.00 A _ g„� 2 \ L=27.72 ------100------- REBAR N W O 1 � Q) ---- (q I N N I � V ooWJ / S00°01'33"E 70.50 01� �--4=18°41'05" m 05 S °9 Q q C.Brg=S10°56'11' W ° %4 o x 2s.00 2a.00 2a.00 2a.00 2s.00 Z o h/ 6 26 j6 NOT TANGENT - c?,.4ps,60 _ , Q yrD,oQr S C.=27.60 N19 262 --• B/ C\sd o 0842 - S00°01'33"E 124.00 S48°47'16"W ,�•�--S57°56'00'E �� 9 ,N& 5/° q„ g r NOT TANGENT 159.80 22.59--_- :1 30.00 / 27.29 171.03 O i __ N89°53'36"E / S00°01'33"E 360.83 REBAR S00°01'32"E 93.34 n 13.88 SANDSTONE MONUMENT AT I I -- NW CON. OF THE NW QUARTER o ' SEC. 24, T. 116, R.23 I M WEST LINE OF THE NW QUARTER OF SEC 24 In I WATERS EDGEDRIVE --AND CENTERLINE OF S.H. No. l0I S89019'43"E ;,I,',� ; �_ �; I f --- NOT TANGENT \ 33.00 , v , , - R=127.60 \ S00001'33"E 362.74 - - - - - - -= - \ - 1 I L=116.49 , �, A=52018'23"--soo°oI'33"E els.o9-- i1 - - C.Brg=S33° 3437i " W � „ C.=112.49 71 [NOT TANGENT. / 1 \ 1 n I I I n - r - I. / /1 / -I- n MEASURED] /_v r V ./ / A V/ A// L_ 1 V L- L-/ 1/ / A L/ L/ I A J V VICINITY MAP SECTION 24, T. 116, R. 23 51-1 p �\2 GAT P "A?, NW 1/4 NE 1/4 SW 1/4 SE 1/4 NOT TO SCALE THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SEC. 24, T. 116, R. 23, IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF S89079'43"E. Denotes 1/2 inch iron pipe monument found marked as shown o Denotes 1/2 inch x 18 inch iron monument set marked by license no. 18425 unless otherwise shown ® Denotes Mag Nail Set B4 O Denotes MNDot monument found (R) Per Record Documents -e_ Denotes access control to MNDot [ALL OF THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS EMBRACED WITHIN LOT I, BLOCK I, GA TEWA Y NORTH, AS DEDICATED ON THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, DOC. NO. 451279, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA, HAVE BEEN VACATED PER DOC. NO. Z---mmmummi Scale in feet 0 40 80 120 ONE INCH EQUALS FORTY FEET ALLIANT ENGINEERING SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS r ALA Mr,'" p t SITE SITE PLAN Scheme 01 ""IMRSM %VAN �A • 'Ile{ up Scheme 011 Tabulation UNIT NAME UMF Al 1BRN Al-ALT HBM 950 1.150 4 25.00% 4 25.00% 100.00% RL NO. OF UNR: 19 PNEAIS COMPUTED TO NCLLDE SQUARE FOOTAGE FROM EXTERIOR FACE OF ALL EXTERIOR FRA'.£ WALLS THAT ENCLOSE AY E. 0 DOES NOT IJCLLDE PATIOS BALCONIES, PATIOSAI-O" STORAGE. OJECTDATA 'AVERAGE NET SF: 1235 S.F. :AGE: APPRO%. 3.40 ACRES TRY: 4.71 UNITSIACRE UNG PROVIDED: TYPE I BUILDING GARAGE: 24 SPACES SURFACE: 20 SPACES TOTAL: 44 2.75 SPACE PER UNIT BUILDING TABULATION TYPE I COUNT UNIT TYPES BLDG. AREA TOT. AREA 1 4 1-Al:1-A1-ALT;1-B1;1-B1-ALT 4,940 18,780 TOTAL 4 19,780 MjNNN 1 � ` SCALE1' = 40' 124"06' SHEET) 0' 40' 80' 160' /� .Nel.nwwmr.wl w.un��.w) ee^ a vw o e ne cw •• SITE DIE � i--� ^� � / I uun rmeuin / i I N IWn J Lu En V v /I RESIDENTIAL LOM DENSITY (NET DENSITY 1 24 1 ACRE) RESIDENTI4 MEDIUM DENSITY (NET DENSTY At 1 ACRE) MIXED (NET DENSITY X I ACRE) IRDENo- ® mr.w.e.neN.e.Y.oaww :1o..eer Mau®tea r. �urMreoA� --..ram 1 C2.1 � I � w �io��, c �r� �� HEADWATERS —DEvnop E — MISSION HILLS WEST 8o-UNIT SENIOR CO-OP Sa= WEST PARK CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA N� `' 0.EJ1ell pw`A y \ FOP�\M`sI UCttoN I pR A oo Not FO IF.('T I1WATION VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SHEET INDEX COVERSHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY PRELIMINARY PLAT SITE PLAN GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN GRADING PROFILES EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS UTILITY PLAN TREE CANOPY COVER AGE PLAN TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN LANDSCAPE AND REFORESTATION PLAN LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE, NOTES AND DETAILS LANDSCAPE DETAILS PARKING EXHIBIT NO. 1 2-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-14 15-17 18 19-21 22 23 24-26 27 28 29 PULTE HOMES 7500 OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE SUITE 325 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 PH: 952-988-8224 CONTACT: PAUL HEUER EM: PauLHeuer@j%keGroup.com CONSULTANT ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 233 PARK AVENUE SOUTH SURE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 PH: 612-758-3080 FX: 612-758-3099 ENGINEER MARK RAUSCH LICENSE NO. 43480 EM: mmuach@aRiaut-ioc.com SURVEYOR DENNIS B. OLMSTEAD LICENSE NO. 18425 N EM: dolmatead@alliaot-iuc.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MARK KRONBECK LICENSE NO. 26222 EM: mktoaheck@alliaut-inc.wm Ppam�':) ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S. Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 2 6 58.3080 NUN fi12.758.3099 . w 'alliam-inc.com J H C3 m to 5 a 2 Q Z 2 D w IL W w 2 y w w O U I n.ney nmry thO This a,. Pop.. .pclNcoXun. p.N . v..w.a Jr, m. o �' m El..ca nd aub Lvrea.Jr v0.prt SWN.LL ENGINEER —d- nn lu. ur m. s'...1 YINNESOi. NNRN RurscN, a =1 ASSORINIOE/00ata0t PROJECT NO: D.-Ol. 0 60 120 240 50ptE ai FEET 'NICT 1 of 29 Ir I FA 0 25 50 100 SCALE 81 LEFT LEGAL DESCRIPTION POt O 1 Part 1 the Northwest Worter of the Northeast Quarter of SecWn 2e, Tomeol 116. Remits, 23. l taumty uinnenom. a.—ihe eas lams: pornmencmg at the northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of sold Section 2e; trance an an assumed bearing of South 89 .egress 19 minutes 43 se,mds East along the earth line of all Narmwast Quarter 3Y.W feet; thence South 25 de Tees 26 minutes 43 ason cds East 12&M feel to a point an the centediw of Slate Higtreay Number, 01 add Went Eeing the pal of "inning of We treat to the Manorial Nance feathery dmg add cenleTne dmg a men lengenlid amwe that as comets to the north, sand curve Mkng o cerhd mingle of M degrees II minutes 57 sto,or , a redua length of 621.15 feet on arc langlh of N.73 fast. a chard hewing of South 74 mderees 12 ules on 13 seconds Weft and a chard lmglh of 99.62 last: VnmegWce South 79 deeea minutes 53 secands Wast along said cementite and tangent to last descrdM curve 163.44 fast: thence route ealerly ding sand centw'frre along a tm,mbal curie that as onw m ato the southeast. in vervemind hmmg a angle of 19 degr ees W minutes 53 Jecands aradius length of 23till fast, an arc length of 79.38 feet: thence continuing southeasterly dong acid centedne song a compound rue, that is comams to the southeast. sold Culf,ne hating o central angle at 52 degree 18 minutes 23 seconds. a radius Ieoglh of 127.60 feel, on ac length of Hb49 feet, a chord bearing of South 33 deyaea 34 minutes 37 seconds West, a drard all of 112.e9 last to the West We of sand Northeast Ouarlr, thence South W Malvinas 01 minutes 33 seconds East hang said cmlerfne and t mg the Weal We of see Northwest Ouorter W27e fast to the South line of the North 6W W feet of the West Hot of the Ncrlhemst Wort« of sold Seclim 24; loan,. South 89 degrees I9 Miutes 43 senconds East dong fain South line 4WA3 fast to the westerly right-ol-way IMe of Trunk Hicfway humhw 317: thence northeasterly dmg said easterly righlel-way has Wong a non familial curtf that is concente to me southeast, al curve haaarg a central angle of 11 degrees 42 mnute M secal a teases length of .35&W fast, an orc length of 71L57 feet, a chord Making of Nate 64 degrees, 07 minutes 43 seconds East, a chord length of 71,44 feel thence North 16 delveas 17 minutes 03 ore mane East along sold wastMy right-of-way fare lad not tangent to the lost dearlhed curret MO.W fast; thence northerly long aoid veaterly right-of-way line dong a norn tongential curne that is c w to the east said curve bd ho ing a cmangle o1 O dqm W minutes Q secands, a re6ualength of 981,48 feet, an >c length of , .W Mal a dmf d hearing Norm 20 Wagrees 0 minutes 18 senmds East. a chard length of 298,83 fast to the Norm line of mid Northwest Quarter: thence North 89 central 19 m-utes 43 xcmds Weft long seed North Ire and not tmgenl to lost sensational cure 118.25 feet to the cenlMine of State HigWay Number 101; thence southeasterly along sob cenlerlMe along a man Impel curw that is conconfe to me northwest, said curve hwnq a central ". of 20 deWeaa 33 minutes 03 wends, a feel length of 621.15 fast, on arc length of 222.79 het. a charts beVng of South 59 delver 19 of. 43 seconds Wast, a chord length of 221.60 fast to the Mont of b.,Mnng. Porcel 2 Lot I, Whck 1, fgheoy North. Carver. County. MMnell a-0 3 Lot 2, fi k 2. Wlawey ell Carver Cwnly MMneeola. Pares . Wlbl A, Wteway North, Cares Count,, Vinnewla. AwArmt VICINITY MAP - Norros:4 E 4 3 x } ere n, ` e a.mtN u i 9vd".© as N� ti 3 as Lake Susar>g i C d' M„'• g d� or@/ 9 ,® sole. se �a t94b$ bW er S�E al naaearar a �b t ' R•n re'O's "I ashe ®w f S n ranasw nth aF+q �6 cr. kwb� aw ion n61..aar sae x5 rr NOTES 1 1-1-tlMaiapertyasses'samycwn less p,Nse Yle.everm I.m+ee a sa..n m C.«evy mnavry. Ne io01ww1.4,. wanes v m1e. z. TIe trmva d un6r,p. ui4«ue GpCwl yBB! on YlamWiv,Imml3tMar5ue pin Cal MtNn Me '6eiMry 9vavy Mob'. m. wn.pr... peMydw amrrarNn d«ru. mesa wp«.d pwev W e m a keeNGxveelrMrreywnes.V .WW«viM1albraeuernvd« J. Ma✓Y4ndae M.0 Mbsn a puedmaw Grw(bnM IludM SyebT N1@J. Cmrti««ere Gra GxseY9nsn0seet 6md mere Ilnrmrae Cmd«b 9Y>bm_ SkuWm2ve... t.4w lW W skkmQ t AYONr MMl 5. Teer«dAvetga bvLv pplay Y Mt1W feubebdv 105am®. 0. Bnch«h:9Yrwy BMue1 MwrcreY. MaOTronetpip. batlad n Ben6ren PeA Clwlrmm.se Rs, Pateidd8lW HgIMWy lot yw®nrW fese.mb wA dmpd meery ImeneM@n d n3el M NAwm LEGEND ee —� oikeelson,wzs + c.e kae.r slot: W.. t BWrrm.�1 1 seek" apt — «1VYtwsualml —.— I sus. vrw salsue¢ a Th. w. O enYgE 9M.lq usrro p� n.offo.cr.c«..na oo'm, ,a min .c. e m«m an e 01V6f'pS q[ a a ar fe.cr a e e. en se,1.,¢9 mai.� em m90 W 1(A9Np w0®1 .[Q$OTIbAs scald eMeWf of ai al ' Wass. Gam^Mi. has",hat en eh vo.o«r facka efowrkrao BEARING ROTATION DETAIL -Ivor 70SCA1E N uL cr is vs, 6 YC N 233 Park Ave S. Ste 300 Minneeipoll MN 55415 612.756.3080 MUN ALLIANT 612.758.3o9e F. ..a...a.. W'.9lN.diram-IfM:.I`AR1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY p WNB PP.aa UE PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA cHEcl�o er o&a Sllgll muEI&wEQ W1 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. AND 760 & 761 su I w LAID=SUSAN DRIVE ,pgfp fiat® CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 n¢o WEw n --- sm•ro NT JBeJ -_� y' =>>- .� ✓ N99'laNw ✓ s ,,.nazi _____—_ e4gg9 �q?-- W 2 i-.. ._i x I I N�EDI IS r.iQid�� /•_trN' // 0' Ix L 99 ]J m GBrpSfD'ID'N'W aw� x F y91/SYx y x-a -22/6/ m IL IL /• 1�g•9q•53' O$ / D S d I , RNE ar¢ xmD� HERS pC'E ., xwu w� 6 csy>sa9rJrw c.=nzw i II Ili J, 1 xw. �� a m -- Ws .... J an awn x°�m x.¢« ..� `¢"er�¢ � ...,, � a sh .mow. Ix i mn � xm aw, Inr aw.arx ar. xn _-_________ ae.n sM�" pp��__ / ., �"m/A11t3I aui, , . • >> ,>�. .. i x,w�¢wr , • , , ^.Y Rant ii� xs� �_ ... ��t nib ^�4�wP. a xwn xan aan �_ xc¢ a xma xas O xrwE'. ia0.V¢ awa awu .ws xs�m xmr Y ..r xw. aw a xn¢ s¢ .e.6• QC/ may:-'_. ^_ xvd�wT xxwau esdP>a> � '4'' c xM e'x.m I •va.¢ ...... II —Ilk v awx xw¢ n _� xx,uaw. a.,31¢➢P" a x :.u"°.+.`.,> ��'a5`��... Y �� ww:.+m �t _ Sm'ro NF Na.Jx,w :ww 1,* - :-- — C gym¢ k NO BLLbN^S ° ,! Y V 1 11111 . q - .^' '55 SEE SNEET I OF Z I- I- to 0 25 50 io SCAI�� BEARING ROTATION DETAIL - NOT TO scar e N WffW/14 d SEa H 599'ID'N'E (GRVfR R N N LEGEND a `o a*w e.vx eo.➢�cva mrc, e v ry.c..n p'AE 11,ac o°w .mss o rwcr e ¢ P.wm an KR r nw nc.u,. cm.. rxmTM. woo, w, m`c°'�n40L.azMOiDm.w D,s..a4,.Dr¢w,rarar m 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 s,ww¢r.E.Ds.a+¢rd 46 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 H.,a 51z.758.3088 rN eFHHIaH Owstuo tO i A L L I A N T rr vmw.alliam-inc.com s� x +r. raHin r➢Dr+ u oee Buis Nu,bp E EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA CHECIGROe4 mm. ,E� E�9ND 6 8601 GREAT PLAINS BLVD. AND 760 & 781 SCALE r_m LAKE SUSAN DRIVE "No. warm CHANHSSEN, MN 55317 mncxsw n OUTLOT8 'L ~ LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE R.O.W R FOUND IRON MONUMENT 0 30 60 120 SCALE IN FEET OUTLOT V Q foGGVP P\M`N PR \ j � CONS Jc Na _WATERS EDGE_ DRIVE _ -- w� SO'Ot'32'E 93.34' — m 2 f w N1g16 T3� d 0 m 9 aow m der o Nm pm mmO �a DAP sm Qm �9 mN Y , ! S b 0� 5O'OOO7•E 131.39 oW e� I APPLE TREE LAIC SO'01'33'E 36273 G � — ¢ 1 / OOTLOTE " - _ 5 OCK 0 s a 3 ] 1 W m e iLOTF vn r.vnr r➢9 P N UT 'm I OLOT O =. 1 R Y m 1 IT e 5 9m I c 1 m' oW N e. o o, 1 9 amor< _ ! - ownr..,00m mW m' STATE HIGHWAY 101 Jp.aed ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 612.758.3080 Mwl 812.756.3099 F. www.alliarn-inc.com UT 'm I OLOT O =. 1 R Y m 1 IT e 5 9m I c 1 m' oW N e. o o, 1 9 amor< _ ! - ownr..,00m mW m' STATE HIGHWAY 101 Jp.aed ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 612.758.3080 Mwl 812.756.3099 F. www.alliarn-inc.com J J FQ F Q W m 0 5 � Q w Z Z � a J J to i W W x °C 3 Q. a er m• or .,,e.r ..r amra P«.mo. o.a Mm ; a.M1 Uomxtl PRORSSIOXIL ENGINEER untlrt s la.a al M. $MI. of uINxE5Or1 F aI.VSCM. PE OVAIItt ASSURANCE/COMIIpL Br WTE DATE ISSUE ofslcxfo: um BRIWx: ELL PRwaT No: rB-owB 4 SHEET 4 of 29 QQ �_ (133HVd HIHON) 1Vld AHVNIWIl3Hd F z = 40 Q " Ma4 E y �zS 8 e 1tl11mens IVld AHVNIWIl3Hd _ �Il0�3 a �j dd a r g o 'N3SSVHNVHO �. ¢' '$ E VIOS3NNIY1 rY 4 C N N NHVdISM LA 5 0 z w 0 w J n W cc O W w W W cc W f Q 3 ad tl o dd 6 tl tl o d - tl u tl tl o d o o tl o 0 s. o tl e o tl tl o tl d tl d tl tl o �g�16�4D;;a4�i&$1�il��afilq�s�D�is!Is5i39�tdi ,Bra` N.��A._ DFUVE S STp MpN r AT NwL,CYI NW CWAM WC, N. [IIL• N.23 q.2 87 yr,8 `80 3883 1N3.M13 MOLL aN MmYN I I I,aacn M¢z,BCLBs� i - � �1 BpMNWE Nn� -_ .e °C.BIs� 69 r L£NTMF v sN No. 0, v.ae. a PRAM I 31K Incq$4 ISS U o8 F- O g2 ; gy v P. M1 6 o $ • e a'NB �'g$ h '' 5•R 4�11 •�d -g 'fir, e�, di � BDo ro PJ� M.SE8 MS Z 0 20 40 eo scuE w rT><T °"LV F°A a\;` ^�N PS ov PtioEL WATERS EDGE DRIVE 4:IBA PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE R.O.W • FOUMD IRON MONUMENT PARCFl ARFA TABLE PARCEL AREASF ARFAAC B111 tome 0.m Btu 1.ce 0.04 1110 1.408 a04 B14E4 1.M 0.p B1LS I.M ON 1.090 am sH.I I.M 0.05 BI LOW 0.04 I&I 1" 1104 BHA Lass 0.04 [KILLS LOSS 0.04 BHA I.M 0.0 1I 1.R90 am B3L2 1.8341 as 8019 I.M 0.04 EI 1.836 104 BHS 1.M 0.01 BI I.M am U14b1A 10.4%! 0.45 0J 11 Stsb 121 TOTAL I 1m,Ow 1 240 6 ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 A A 612.758.3099 PAN W .alliarrt-inc.mm J W U J Q a x C�_ C m O 7 rA y w a 0 w a a z 2 2 Q w Z 2 I1 N 1n i W W ¢ x 3 a a = nxr i N Pion. .o,.er �n.onan. a ..cony. e••Pa..a Nr mr —aNr m �Nna �..N suPN�' o mol I PPOSI tE5510NLL ENGINEER uMx 1Na la.s NI M. SMH NI IrvxF50LN PNK R4USCx. PE QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL R — D4T ""ON" NPN DMwx: ELL PROJECT NO: ilfi-0199 6 4EHT 6 of 29 13 Al LEGEND - EASEMENT LINE -- - BUILDING SETBACK PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE ROW a 0 50 SO 120 SCALE IN FEET GENERAL SITE DATA NORTH PARCEL: IAgo CONCRETE SIDEWALK WATERS EDGE DRIVE 1 AD ' (INSETA) 7-=Addadudd. �Y 9fauPiruM Nnao PAVEMENT SECTIONS _aJ_ .elA and, P - w aYa.. NA . as as as le WAM add PID - 252930010. ZW242420 EXISTING ZONING - RSF-SINGLE FIYRY RESIDENTIAL MDR -PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPYENF/RESOERVL DISTRKT PROPOSED ZONING - POOR 20M LAND USE = RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTUL MEDIUM DENSITY MIXED PROPOSED LAND USE - NO CHANGE GROSS AREA 8.1m A: PROP WATERS EDGE DANE R/W DEOICKT 0.795 C NET AREA, 7.,I58 AC NET AREA WmI1N 9gRDAND D6TNCT 4.111 AC PE MODS AREA WRWN SHORFJAND DISTRICT PRIMARY' STRUCTURE SETBACKS: 89.897 SF (50.20%) YMTERS EDGE DINE = 25' LAKE SUSAN DRIVE = 25' TN lot - AO' PRIVATE ROAD - IA' BACK -BACK GRAVIKY - Z ' MN, (22'-Z6' RANGE) SOUTH PARCEL: PIU = 252930030. 2529SCH0 E%ISnNG ZONING = PUDR-PUNNED UNIT OEVElOPMENT/RESIOENIIAL DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING - POOR 20M LAND USE = NIXED PROPOSED LVND USE = NO CHANGE GROSS ARU 2.43o AC PR1WM STRUCTURE SETBACKS: MORTH PUT OMITS - 2s SOUTH PUT UMITS = 25' LAKE SUAN SDRIVE - 25' TH 212-N0' ORNATE ROAD - 24' BACK-BUX DRNERAY = 22' MIX. (22'-26' RANGE) V A 1,Oa PEv1E'N 014L a ND 10ow ` -4101E1NO DISTRICT BGAIDARY STATE HIGHWAY 10! SITE PLAN REVIEW TABULATIONS: 1 I APPLE TREE LANE PARCEL (PINS 1) I \ � I I I 1 ( SITE PLAN NOTES: FULL PROJER (NORTH AND SOUTH PARCEL COMBINED) TOTAL AREA WITH R/W VACATION - 10.568 AG (160,229 S) GROSS BOOR AREA OF EACH BUIDING - N/A K SITE COVERED BY BUILDING - N/A K OF SIE COVERED BY IMPERIOUS SURFACE - W.OK K SITE CFAERED BY PARKING AREA = N/A PROJECTED if OF EMPLOYEES = N/A / OF SEATS IF RESTAURANT OR ASSEMBLY PUCE - N/A / PARKING STALLS REWIRED - 1 NSBOR STALL/4 UNITS - 21 STALLS 2 STALLS/UNIT (I GARAGE) = 164 (82 GARAGE) / OF PARKING STALLS PAOnGED = 1" GARAGE (2/UNIT) IBI VISTOR (164 DRIVEWAY, 23 OFF-STREET) HEIGHT OF BALDING/STRUCTURES AND / OF STORES = 35' MAX HEIGHT/2 STONES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD "FY TNE LOCATIONS AND E ATOMS OF EpmrvG UnUTES AND IOPOgtAPNIC FEATURES. SUCH AS EASTNC CUTTER IODIDES AT THE PROPOSED ORIVEWATS, PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRAJDNG. THE CONTRACTOR 91N1 IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OF VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. Z. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF WILDING AND/OR BACK OF CURB, BUILDING DIMENSIONS REFER TO OUT90E OF BUILDING FACE (TP) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR CONCRETE STOOPS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED BUILDING. A. CONTINUOUS CONCRETE CURB h GUTTER WHICH CHARGES TYPE SHALL HAVE A MIN. FIVE FOOT TRANSITION ON PRIVATE ROADS. S. ALL CONCRETE CURB AND CARTER ADJACENT TO CONCRETE WALK BE SEPARATED BY A 1/2 INCH EXPANSION JOINT. 6. PAVEMENT STRIPING SHALL BE l INCH W 17E. 7. AL NVRK WITHIN THE R.O.W. STALL COMPLY NFH THE OTY ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS. 8. IND PRIMING FIRE LNE7 SIGNS MUST COMPLY WRIT CITY ORDINANCE, THERE 6 NI PARALLEL 'PA '.S. ALLOWED ON PRIMATE ROADS. 9. AL CURB AND GUTER TO BE CONCRETE 8612. SURMOUNTABLE, OR B618 TYPE AS NOTED, P STANDARDS. 10, STEPS NTH MORE THAN 1 RISEN. WLL REWIRE 3' RANORAIL. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE ICCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTLnES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES SUCH AS EXISTING GUTTER GRADES AT THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS. PRIOR TO THE START OF 97 GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF MY DISCREPANCIES OF VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 12. STEPS IN FORMED/CAST-IN-PILACE SIDEWALK SHALL HAW 8- RISER. A��'wvz' a ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 2.758.3080 MAN .758.3D99 FAA w .alliant Inc.com J m M J F J Fa- O Q a > Y � a w Z 5 (L U W W a H 3 IL w I Mryy c.mrw mW mN Plan, agcifiwlba npotl 6r m amy Unna.ae aawrn.lon andMad 1 ... a aulr PROPEPROFESSIONALL ENSNENGA ARER uMar Ma Imp of Ma S. of YINMESOTA YYp{ AYISI:X. R IN wrz DALE 65UE PROJECT AC. 2�.-0199 I SI ET 7 of 29 (l30HVd H1HON) NV -Id 311S €- _ , gZggS tl1W8fS IV'1d AHVNIWIl3Hd Etl1053NNIW N3SSVHNVH„aE=ecco � a �tle )Idtld 1S3M N mN Z O g m z w i z J 9 Z N LU I O O J I = s Igo^ >� 110gk1P W j I J w W /LL 1 1 ° d a o i 1 / EpGE DRIVE W p,?ERS —_ —� e s Bl K2 1 $ 4 03 9 q 3 11 T Z £ 4 TT M Ol8 p 0�O A \ y n 3� q i6 y • 3 q q 5 2 LOO 5 I I ' C 61 II s/ 0 i� d do N" / / CI o I i W /I i PED RA1P -_ I LEGEND: r CASTING BIMIW0115 11ENL REY011E E185TIN6 APRON __ �EXISTING _ _ _ _ _ F/ REPLACE W/ 8618 C&G - EASEMENT LINE — PROPEEALING SEBECK •. PRT LINE LINE f LW LINE W T"A"NEE (TT•P) WATERS EDGE DRIVE -ROW OUnDT B I NORTH PARCEL I----- PED RAW \ (PHASE 1) I _________ �-----NF. BASIN i� / / GIN, p�B — ' , 8 1 ` 5' TRAIL/WNK 612 CdG I,7 HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT TABULA SIDEWALK OT l �� G•D° \ IX R/W SEE MEN ANENTCCU (SEE \ b z, SOUTH PARCEL \ STOP SIGN �` -� RAM �. 8 i•(. 1 (PHASE 2)--_ � 6 N STAR N'ER -9 T 9000 / O MATCH / `,gmST. 1 " -G Z �z. N� N J1EW N�Pa �Z Fo �\�\, R1014 N TASI FtE 00 0 20 Q 80 NOS FpF SCALE IN FEET c� o(merrn °'°� s R) j \ m� TCII ��\ p \ s \� EXIST :S9 \[i Te Ns u. \ Z \ WATCH A. FULL DEPTH SAIII(l /; _ \ MATCH EXIST. REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT �\ CONSTRUCT 6612 C&G \ \ \\Y\, OUFLOTa \ \ `2- MDE CONCRETE SPILLWAY \ ALIGNMENT SEGMENT STATION START STATION END LENGTH CANE DELTA STOMEGATE W 1.1LRA M LAVE 1.11 1.SLW n S5,A 7A'ISMV1NR9.W 3 5OW HEEL UTANGENT�WO DHIDW G✓IGfiS % STONEGATE ROAD171 RVE O=65 CH4XLW OMM 1N 8 m.71 M47 1I.W - 3Pvnr LTANE 1. 10 2 Am 75 TS.W 1 17m. 2.Ia.W 2 W 2L91 PAR a ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758+3080 111 612.758.3099 FAR vCWN.al11aM-1nc.com JF F J � W U m (� a ~ 4 _ 0 5 o 0 ? R M Y Q CL w Z 5 a N a J a a x ~ 3 a rn N., Ay I.IT 1, 11.1 IN. I.H 1:.1a1,.eXnv m :° oeo my m. 1 eup. rvlaon om ma1 . duly L—HiNi uH."ESSIGNAL ENGINEER und.. R. 1... OI M. $IN, ar u1HHE5mA •PR RAYSCX. PE QUALITY ASSURANCE/C0NTR01 a. DATE DATE ISSUE DESIGNED: WAR DRAWN: u ARDIEEE rro: :1s-D1ff 9 SHEET 9 of 29 GRADING LEGEND: PROPOSED LOT URR` RETAINING WALL BE 1 INADNp PAD. SEE CET/L (NOT CENCTED IN PLAN NEW PROPOSED CATCH flISINS 1 2 3 0 PROPOSED BELONG FOOTNKM _>—>— PROPOSED STORM SHYER BEAR PAD EIEVARN (AT FLOOR ENITS PROPOSED EASEMENT �DWw)SI-----_- LVA�( WHAGED ACOIRNAL WAGE STEPS PROPERTY LINE ORMRAY SLOPE — SETBACK LINE LOT LINE EOSFRG CONTOUR _ - — RNMIr-OF-WAY —912— PROPOSED COHTI M - - - - - - - TREE PR)TECTION UNITS +ILA 901 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION Aywyyvyry� EOSTING VEGETATION CHIT lW 1S0 TOP OF WALL ELEVATION TREE To REMAIN (PROTECT) BW 'E0 g2TFOM OF WALL ELEVABON IS]. OIRECIDN OF DRMNAGE y omaxY oERELI ROUEN6 Etta- q "I( FORE 0.`M\N P �Z PREP" �oNs 0 30 60 120 Noi FOAL SCALE IN FEET GRADING NOTES: I. Al HI SHED GRACES SW1L SLOPE AWAY FRNI PROPOSED DLUE-NES AT YNIWM BRIDE OF 2." ALL SCONES SHWL IMVE A ul.I.UM SLOPE OF 2.00R. 2. THE 0ONINA7OR 51WL KEEP THE ANMENE PICADORS FREE BE DEBRIS AND PRMN1 THE W-ATE TRACKING BE SOL N ACCORDANCE WITH THE REOUNEMENIB OF THE pIT AND WATERSHED, 3, ROBBY GOPHER STATE ONE CI AT (BOO)252-1164 0 HOURS PRIOR TO STARE BE CONSTRUCTION. A. ML 91PRONTMENIS TO EMPORIA RTH CT' OF CHANWREN LYNSIRKIICN'WR05 SPEIlFIG1pN. -`TEST EDIIIM. S. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SILL BE PgBVIDED AT I CONSTRUCTION ACCESS POINTS. G. REFER TO CEOTECHNIfµ REPORT AND PROTECT WRUII FOR WE CORRECTOR REWMdEN15 AND NlOHNG REMNREKENR. ). STRIP TOPSOIL PRIOR TD MET CM6IRUCIpN. REUSE STECKPIE ON SITE STOCKPILE PERAClO6 NOSE BE PROTECTED NM SILT FENCE. IL PRIOR To STARTING CONSIR1K1gN. THE CONTRACTOR SHML M RESPONSIBLE TD WXE SUNE THAT ALL REWNED PERRDS AND KRRDIAES HAVE LEE11 MA RRO. N3 CMSIRUCIpN MR FABRICATION SHAL BEGIN UNTIL RE MNRACTMt HAS RECENED AND TKMWMILY REARS ED ML PVl6 AD OTHER DOV REARS APPNMED BY AIL OF THE PERNITEM ARCA16. 9. WREDNTELY FOLLDNW GRADING Ci (}.1 Be BEATER) SCE SLOPES AND DRMHACE SNA£5. ROBB Feet NAWET MI OTHER APPRfNED SOIL $TABEIING IEFIOD (APPR'NED BY EW7EER) SHAL BE AP ERE0 EARN NNIpEO SOM RO(TRE MO A .. M IBPSGE. 10, TE BEEFM CONIRCIOR COST OFL59 CElElE1ND PLM6 MR ALL SUBCONTRACTORS TO YflKY RFOFS REOWiFlE1NTB BE DEWAIOYY 6 REQUIRED BENAR. CONSTRUCTION. CORNMACTOR SHOULD CONSULT OTN ETKIOI COATI INSPECTOR AND DICIER TO OEONRNE APPROPRIATE REHOD. 11, REFFA TO SEOTIVEAIER POLUTICN PRE"E TON PLAN (SWPPP) FOR ALL EROSION MO 4ORERE CORRO DEICE LOOT ON, !DESCRIPTIONS. NOTES AND MTALS ENO.WIN' NOIEIE WASHOUT FA,ON `INSTRUCTIONS. 12. BUILDING FERMIS ARE REOIRED FOR AL RETMNNB NULLS A FEET N IERNI OR GREATER AND THE WNLS SHALL BE DESIGNED of A GEFNUCNAL ENGNER NEN DESIGN RiLm MD MPApFD IN THE Cm' PALM ro NSTALAFIBN. 13. A 3 FOOT SAFTI RAILING IS REOURRED AiN AU- WMLS W TML OR GREATER. STATE HIGHWAY INFILTRATION BASIN NOTES: 1. INn"APON WIN AREA NEEDS RI BE OVER-E%GVATED TO 1£.4 OF OOSTNB BRµUILR SOILS AND FINISHED GRADED WITH DESIGN SOIL uR, SEE MAIL ON SNFET 11. z ALL TEMPpPIA ENO9ON CONDNL DEICES .UST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO INSTAI1ABGN/C0NSIRURION OF INFILTRATION RSN. 3. KL STONNATER RUNOFF SHALE BE OVERIED AWAY FTCY INILTPATION AREA TO TEMPORARY SEDIMENT POND UNTIL WIN 6 COAPLETELY OWED AND PLANTED. A CONSRRUCnON OF WIN SWLL BE SUSPENDED WRING PERIODS OF RAINFALL OR SNGWYELT. CONSTRUCTOR SHAL RFMMN S,RPEPOED 6 PARADED WATER IS PRESENT OR IF RESIDUAL SOME MOISNNE CONTNIRRES SXN6NANILY TO THE POIENME FOR COMPACPDN, 5, EWPACT`GN AND SMEARING OF THE SOLS BENEATH THE FLOOR AND SIDE SLOPES OF THE IWILTRANON BASIN AREA SMALL RE NNIMIZED. WRING SITE DEILOPMENT, THE AAA OEOIUTED TO THE INPORA.TION WIN SW L RE CONDONED OFF TO PREVENT ACCESS ON HFAW EOUFAENT. ACCEPTABLE EWIPMEM FOR CONSTRUCnW THE BASIN INGLUBE5 ExGVADON HMS. Wlrt EQUIPMENT RTH TURF TVPE TIES.. EGURMENT MR ROE TRACK UYLERS. 6. R, C,N A:n0N OCCURS AT TILE BARE OF THE BASIN. THE ROIL 9WL BE MfMM.T1FE0 ED A DFPIN M LEAST M.. i SLFAiM' DO.Y6, RE SNEAED AREAS BE THE INTERFACE SNARL Z CONNECTED BY RMNC OR WTO-TUIG. F. CONTRACTOR TO BAD TEST P I BENNG TIME OF CONSTRUCTION TO DMIAMTE ANN pegBE NEEDS FOR 5OL CONNECTIONS, ENGINEER m RENW PER E AM 5 GETEEE ONEED FOR MH IME16TN1 FDR EITHER TFMPOVAY TURF ESTAl196ENT. OR TO R1EAE SEBOALY HIGH, RATER CdpTKKS. E CONTRACTOR AO' O E TO UEAK WIN BUTTON EILVATI N RAN 1'-T O G MASS GRADING ND CONFECT GRADING .AFTER UPSTREAM AREA 6 S MIRED. APPLE TREE LANE PAD MRNS A UNIT W 5 UNIT 120' 6 UNIT IN' M a�M I.P s•.va vlaAe eeS, p AD WT �k f• QMAZ SIPtl A MT ]Y W AW 6tl[ 6 0® nen®O S-Wm >TO®Ai1W 11 YLIY YRTOA Er A uAS6 mAx Lnr R S AV CN GRADE ro m fllENpT HOLD DOWN DETAILS 46 ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 NANN 612.758.3099 FAA INWrN alliaM-inc.com J m y g IL Q a z 2 J W 2 a J J Q Lu W O z g W z Z Q 0 0 z a 0 Z cc Q a .Er eall0 ,nel e o Ian, tl ena IN.PgRe,I, Uc-nsNHJ ORION WEER nJv OWN; of EN. 5bM el NINHESOTA WAR l( gAUSCN. PE 5 — on — E. OUALTY ASSURANCE/CONTROL By DATE ISSUE DATE PROJECT NO: 211-01. 10 SHEET 10 of 29 GRADING LEGEND: APPLE TREE LANE 0 20 40 so \V Not FOP ® �I SCALE IN FEET PRON]¢D LOT um !RAVING PAC. SEE DEr. (NOT DEnc1Fo N ALAN WEW t ^ 3 A PNCy040 911DMD iDO1MMT WAR PAD eEVA1NN MIRNE NLT D Ar N, IAi DOM SPECIFIED UNITS PFA OFF (SPAT .6 ADDIINNIL OMM£ Sl MNE9WY ACRE —912— EOS1MG CONIWN PROPOSED CONTOUR J •t244 jf•E PpOPoSEO SPoT ELLVARON 1W MO TOP OF WALL ELEVATION DW 11.0 eOTTDN OF WALL ELEVATION DIRECTION OF DFNNACE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ROUDNC RETANINC WALL so PROPOSED CATCH BASINS — >— >— PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPERtt LINE SETaACN LINE LOT LINE R -OF-WAY PROTECTION UMITS EXISTING VEGETATION UMDS Q52. TREE TO REMAIN (PROTECT) nntr ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MAN 612.758.3099 Fm W .alliant-ino.Com J W U R Q a x O z J J a W m O M Q N z ~Q a 2 J a Y E Q Q Q z z W W a CC 3 a 0 ,P„IRcullcn. n nPue . Pr,Ror,a er m „ne.,m wry u.Wmne IWIETIO ENGINEER -de, W... n oM. MSIGN of 1 .I MINNFSOTA u,Prc RAVSCM. VE OUAUTY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY oAIE DATE WUE E. 11 SHEET 11 of 29 t• �7 D 20 40 Bo SCALE IN FEET V\e,N ovv(14 it` P fo��MNN 1lu'�Ct\ON NO nNK 12- 91A' ff AN WilTP IM Am. NCLWNG !IC,, SAID AND M COBOST REPLACE) NTILTRAT ON ME111A/TILL - MAY 9E MATERIAL EXCAVATED FROM MATE IF GRANULAR Fdt OUE.YMs mzD-mO GRADE IMOR4904/ 0'1uAR)90R SEDIMENT fM®AY RM%FPEN COSTING900 waun------------- ?'. 896 _.1 ..; , � DYER DY i0 SANDY SCALOL 892 1ElR92 892 891 891 o+oD z+oo SECTION A -A WATERS EDGE DRIVE 1/2--2- RGGK DINE INEILIRATM TER 1 eALx BOTTOMD ROCK WEEPER PROFILE VIEW El01LE FABRIC OME TY PE E NOTES: BIT10Y a RIRP rRAu SEE MI SPECS 22573, 5601, IJSJ ! JRRN 2. CLASSTPE N (SPEC JD (SPEC. 3601) WTI GEOTE%TLL£ FAaOC LINER, ROCK WEEPER (NTS): GRADING LEGEND: LOT U41 D. 11NE CRATING DETAIL IN LAN (x0T DEPICTED M PUN NEW jXPROPOSED SED fEI 9UNDWG EOT1RNNi RE. REAR RA" PAD ,MAW FLOOR EU.TM (Ai DO:R) NPEC6IED UM3 POP OFE (NRIi VW1N) ATT111CNAL GMAM S1 E%ImNG WNiDUR —912— PR(RPGI C@RWR J .12M 0 PROPOSED SPoi ELEVA1pN TM 15.0 TOP OF Wµy ELEVAiKKI 9N 11 o 11070Y OF WALL ELEVATRMI g CTICN OF DRAIRAGE y EMERGENCY GVEFfLOW ROUTING REMANNG WNL ■ • PROPOSED CU`CN IP51NS > > PROPpSEp STORM SEMER PROPOSED EASE" PROPERTY TINE SETRACK LINE LOT ME — - - RIGHT -Of -WAY - - - -- -- TREE PROIECWON LIYns E%ISTNG VEGETATION UNITS Q153A TREE TO ROMAN (PROTECT) �- Nw PPec1NN - y^ T�^f— SECTION A —A AMPAT wDPWnx . I I'4E OMMO IAN A \ B SECTION B-B PLAN VIEW INFILTRATION BASIN EMERGENCY OUTLET SECTION (N' / A a ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MAN 612.758.3099 FAT W Ww.alliaM-inc.com J W U Q a O fn a 5 a W m 0 7 Q 1n z 0 g w a i z z Y � Q Q R Q w z C7 a z N a W a w Q 3 a (9 I rlxy 1xc1 INN Alen. ,eR G Gui a"E:. e�..a �w.;�1ao� one bOI I PROFESSIONAL lONAL una., 1... a el M..SAID,, NbN OI uINNESOiA YARN YANSCN, RE CON EN A. 0UAt1TY AAIIRANCE/CwrI DESIGNED: uPR DNAAN: ELL PROJECT NO: 516-0199 12 9NEET 12 of 29 HIGH PT STA: 2+2000 WEST PARK DRNE HIGH PT ELEM.. 912.68 HIGH PT ST L 4+14.33 PM STA:1+95.00 HIGH PT : 912.90 PM EIEV.91276 PM STA: +13.25 1191 PT STA 4+87.03 950 K:14.25 PM ELE .912.94 NIGH PT E}.EY. 912.W LVC:50.00 It2 .34 PM STA4+9500 oj~�N LYL: 0.00 PM ELEM912.46 K:2.31 950 1 I 940 I E1O511NG GROUND, LOW PT STA 1+19, 930 L: PT ELEV: 910. PN STA1+30.00 PM E ..910.16 K: 10.08 LYC:60.00 920 E II II vie 910 _____ -T95x m 900 I 990 880 m FI xm 870 �N 6 � LVC:1592 i FWIISHED GRADE is ` - onP$ 940 LOW PT STA 3+48.00'g' m I +° +a. PT STA 2+0,55 LOW PT ElEM 91255 - V Pi ELEV. 913.00 PM STA3+50.47 v;m 1 STA z*n.5z PM R 912.51 I �w 930 A ELEV:913.02 K:2675 K:22.19 LvC.30.55 LVC:22.13 STA = 5+04.54 920 -ELEV = 01.74 STA = 5+06 21 m w I ELEV = 912t5 STA = 5+11.21 50 -O.SOx 0.69x -O.60x EIEV = 912.25 _ ----_-- . 910 -_---- 2 - - = 750x I 900 890 880 + Es 870 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 BLUE HERON DRIVE 950 HIGH PT- L\ 1.3 w 950 - - HICK PT - 91520 PM Sr 1+60.00 PM 914.91 LOW PT STA 2+55.27 19.35 LOW PT ELEV: 91209 L .50.00 PW STAz+36.04 940 940 PM ELEV.911.99 K: 10.63 I LVC:45.00 GROUND FINISHED GRADE 930 930 LIEMSTING 920 920 STA = 3+62,72 ELEV = 912.SO --- 910 ---- 910 900 I I I I 900 890 WI I I 890 _ 880 NIAg S d R 880 -w n_ w .07 <� ~+s Fw 870 =3 ��<='. 870 o$ EAGLE VIEW ROAD HIGH PT STA 3+56.30 HIGH PT ELEV: 914.11 PM STA3+1380 950 950 PN ELEV: 913.88 HMH PT STA: 1,34.52 K:22.J1 - I HIGH PT ELEV 916.71 LVC:35.00 PM STA: 1+05.00 PV1 ELEV: 91739 940 K: 34,84 LVC:150.W +" f :a _ 940 mom: o+m EYJSTING GROUND LOIN PT STA: 4+32+94 `"� Lot PT ELEV. 912J9 9�0 930 Y sTAu16.w Gw ElEM9R.66 FINISHED GRADE WIC6J I o~ LVC:51.00 STA = 0+00.00^ ELEV = 914.92 n " 920 '_ 920 w a�w -� - - 2.00x 300x vi �� STA=5+1419 - - ______ __- _ m 064>C ELEV = 91429 910 ~ 910 I ------- _ STA = 5+95.29 ELEV = 913.811 900 I I 900 890 o 890 880 Jm o 0 880 moo+ 870 870 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 FOP a�M�\ aPpo� PR�` °O"S N° 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 1 a 6 ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 RwN 612.758.3099 FA" ww W.alliara-inc.corn J W U J Q a 2 cc m O M Z W g O J w IL LL O Y a a Q Z_ U W a A g z H < p W Q LLI Q ¢ cc 3 U d a I M:W/ eMll. Mal MH nn .p.alrcmle.. o a wva"1 I N:•cl M. ana Mnl d.1, J- a eal. liaan.aa EHWNEER uM•� Mnm...... M. m." of M. f d sMN o1 YIWIESOT4 YYIC RWSCN. 1E oaH u p Ra 011AISIY ASSURANGE/COWIROE ULSWNEtr. YW WMYH: Eu PROJECT W. 21.1YP 13 Wm 13 of 29 950 I I I 940 930 920 910 ------ 900 890 880 Jry PT STA tSTO GATE ROAD HIGH Pi ELEV: 910.9102424 PM E]3.50 ELV9 PM ELE:10.1] N20.94 I 950 940 930 920 = 3145.W 91L49 910 3+50.00 909.83 900 890 880 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 STONEGATE ROAD 950 I 950 HIGH PT STA: 1+90.50 HIGH PT EI£V: 908.81 940 PM STA:2+0800 940 PM ELEMM 67 K:9.01 LVG: 35.00 930 M930 920A oS" 920 2.00>: 910 - STA = 2+38.51 910 -0.80% 0EV = 90500 --- __ 26.95% — -4.69% STA = 2+32.84 900 REV = 90.51 900 890 890 880 �IoN €5 0 B7O o� 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 G✓ VIEW ON�f� P� T �\014s, 001 N� 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 VAN 612,758.3099 EA, Mww.alliant-inc.com J W U Q J a a x m O to to ~ W s g J W a 0 z ¢ Y a a x a W z cI a N z � i J wcc a w < 3 IL a nii. NM Mla P1nn. e �r, c1 a�Pw.isim uM ,MI �' NuIT lican,d oRCEESL N ENOuMr n, Im of q1el .1 Xw S* . uINNESef, Y,RI[ RN19CN. K 4M I Nw ; ASSUMWE/C MMM DELGxED: MM M M ESE PROJECT NO: 316-0199 14 SHED 14 of 29 �� 0 30 60 120 SCALE ® LEGEND: F°R P\NJ 04\N PRE °P COSTAL CMNOR 789 PROPOSED CONIOR GIEC141 Cf OPARAGE ■ • PFORKINED GTCN b5s6 - NRP030 FA41EE11T LIME WRACKYqE SO8U LDT 11ME E FRM-Lf-YMY OEIABINC TREE r0 RElwx - TREE PROTECTION UMIS — PRE— 4 ARN PADPOSE) SAT FORM (PRE CRACKS) — M. 4 — PKipSED WT FENS (POST CANONIC) 0 NUT PROTECTION ONO oo NOT oBAMW AMAB / �L \IJ RNavNMO DNWEA¢ ROUOID owc EEWs aEIRER RptlE W161MFIRx ENORI¢ IRNORAM :op MCI CONTRACTOR. GENERAL CONTRACTOR M SWM NSFECTM M CCMPILETE TABLE AS GRADING PIROGRESSES agME i BARRIERS I- SALT FENCE (M11D)T 3886) 2 CURB LOG 3. ROCK NEEPER N FT PROMCTCN 0 N ES L WMCO (MnDOT TYPE A h C) 2 INFRASAFE STORM ORAAN/CULMERT 3. SILT SAM MI TYPE A) 4. DANDY BAG (UI TYPE 9) ANT -TRACKING CONTROL 1. 2- CRUSHED OEM ROCK ITABN nA110N NWP 1. STRAWMAY (LAND OEYELOPMENT) M11WT TYPE I MULCH 2. ERDSON CONTROL BLANKET MnDOT CAT 3 TEMPORARY sFm mix 1. MnDOi-21-111 3. HYDROMULCH (OATS 21-120 DAY STABILIZATION) WOOT TYPE 5 L MnDOT-22-111 (1-2 YR. STABUZAIKN) 4, TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT SC250 NORTH AMERICAN GREEN OR EQUAL-MNDOT CAT R 1. MN)l)T 2$-151 (RESIDENTIAL TURF) 2. SOD GRADING ACMVI 1. CONCRETE WASHOUT IS DONE BY TRUCK MM A MCBRE WASHOUT SYSTEM PRONGED AND COMPLETED BY THE CONCRETE CONTRACTOR. / APPLE THE I VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1' = 30001 NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING: ME MASS SAILING CONTRACTOR IS RESINNI FCe NSTN GON CE ALL ER090M AND MASS GRADING PHASE. SEGMENT CMTRCI BEST MANAGEMENT MR ICES (BMPS) AS 9CARIN N ME WEST PALM -- 1. INSTALL sTABI CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. WRONG S PPP (EXCEPT FOR POST (RAGE BAPS NEEDED AFTER UTUTY CONSTRUCTION 2 PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING µ10 STORAGE AREA AGTNTY). ME WAPS ARE TO BE INSTALLED AT A MINIMUM AS SHOW IN ME PLAN, IF 1 NSTALL TIE PRE-CAAONG SILT FORCES AND INLET PINNECTIO N FOPS M TIE SITE. CODITMS ARISE, ADgTCNµ BAP SUPNEMENTATION TO PREKNT ATE ER05ON ON SEDIMENT .. CONSTRUCT ALL PRE -GRADING EAG9ON AND SEDUERTA IGN CONTROL NMI TRANSPORT MAY BE NECESSARY. ME MAW GRACING CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL 5. COMPLETE MASS [FADING AND NSTµL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SUDNG AND PLANTING. RLpS REDLINE) TO COMPETE ME MASS GRACING ACTNTES AND SOBSEQUENT TEMPORARY B. MINI POST-GR.AVTN SILT PENCE ON ME ATE, SGA STAODUTOI WEEZARY TO PREPARE 97 FOR STREET AND UTNTY CONSTRUCTION AND HOE BIMUNG AT TIE CEANEM)N OF MAW GRAONC MOPK AND SAn4ACTORY SITE SAIL STREET & UTILITY PHASE : STAJnAM MASS MADING CONTRACTOR SNAu COMONATE ME guON. THE MWLLOPER A NSTAu UTILITIES, uN)FROiuNS. S.COMERS. OpiR$ AND O1T1ERs rR.WSEN CF HPCES PERMIT RE9'OSgunEs To ME s1REEi AND UTILITY CONTRACTOR AND z RRI bP RAP ARaxO CUMET STRUCTURES ME CITY 1 INSTALL NUT PROTECTION AROUND ALL STONM SEVER STRUCTME& THE STREET AND UFUTY CONTRACTOR AND CITY ROLL MEN ASSLME ME RESPONSIBILITY TO 4. PREPARE SINE FOR PARING. 5, PAW SHE . PRDNDE INmECGO N AND MANTENANCE OF ANY N-PLACE BMPS AS MOLL AS INSTALL ME A NLL STANUT PROTECTION MACES. ABOPS REQUIREDTHE STREET D UTILITY CCNSIRLMTON DOCUMENT SMPPP. ORTMµ T. NSTNL POST STREET AND UTILITY fFMCE UPpOPLL CTON aF STREET ND UGUTY CONs1RUD CHON. ME STREET AUTILITY n (ONpK ASTEMPORARY ER09M AND SEONENT OEGENIION CONTRACTOR ANAL REMOAE MY BURNS INSTALLEDINSTALLEDIN LED DURG ME STREET AND UR TY PHASE (ONLY F SITE 5 51.AB11IIDA 6 .ffMREp BY THE CONTRACT CONIM MAT ME NO LONGER REQUIRED AMID CC ROINAM ME TRANSFER OFNPTES PEINIT REEPCNS&I BACK TO ME OEYELCPER OR TERNNATE ME PORTION O ME NFUES PERMT 1RANSPERRFD TO ME Ott AND THEIR CONTRACTOR. EROSION CONTROL RESPONSIBLE PARTY: PULTE HOMES 7500 OMCE RIDGE CIRCLE. SUITE 325 EDEN PRAIRIE. MN 553 CONTACT: CHAD ONSGARD PH: 952-229-0723 EM: CIN.I.... d0p.Itdgroup.com CONTRACTOR: roo SWPPP BMP QUANTITIES (PER PLANT: DISTURBED AREA IDS AC SILT FENCE 4.115 LF INLET PROTECTION 32 EA BIOROLL Too W/ CO PLANS SEED/SOD POST GRADING AREA 9.0 AS I. SEE SHEEP 18 FOR ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES AND DUALS. ��. ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MAN 612.758.3099 FAA v .alliaM-inc.com J F QF Z O F U � F m Z W to � a ~ p s g w w a Tn p Y s Q Q Q w Z Z EL g O N I_ a W W O a 2 L1 a W a 6, c H1Y In Inls plan. ARR a1-11ca1 n r,p Prepantl BY In und., -, eL.11 vup.nlslne and mm I c duly UF.m. PROFESSIONAL ENDNEER MI„1... PI M. Si.. PI NESOTA .A.N RAUSCN. PE QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL DIDDORED: APR URAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: RIE-0199 15 SHEET 15 Of 29 \ APPLE TREE LANE WATERS EDGE DRIVE —----�------ �39�3W�5991•FI£991 TY�E� � I ----DND— 91 y r \ yr, \ AR 91 .5 AREAS AFORTE STO WRING j1- \ ` uATE ONST GORING 0 B dCI� O2 1 O LOT F caxsmucnoN \ Y N 0�2p 91 a `K (3-5) CFE 18.5 Tom} I dalgGTJT �y„l 9 B 9fyP W (+15 (1 0. 6 �V ; 5 l B�O9ga O� ' V el. ,a A ; N I 4nF§n. �xAYm Q I P cT i 2' � �N 'ri m 3�'�' r •A .�99%6 a`" P Y 49, 1p an �w \ N SLOPIAS ON POND ROPESA :W ABOVE POST D I GRADING ELT FENCE TRIERE . c-1 F ROPES ARE 3:1 � \ OUTLOT F \ �� AREA FOR STOCKPIUNG MATERIALS OURING a T POR)UtY SEONENT BASK CONSTRUCTION AREA W/ FARCUOTH SKIMMER OUTLET S TA TE HIGHWAY 101 Z F��M�N 0 20 40 80 NOS f O a co SCALE N FEET � LEGEND: N6 CONf00x 7 Ffl X CIYRPM o9rc,w a oM.YVE i MFGU3D 1'AIGI 8.916 ------- MNR6Ep TASEWM u»E inr p¢ - Wort-QF-m O p61NG RSF 101£LLVN --------- 1fIfE Hd]RCIILN IINS � 9�9� s � rxocosEM ar N,rt (Fle mia9cl � ra 991 s � P9aroga a. rt,Kc tvnsr cNin9c) Q M PO N DND cow omuW MFA$ rt,9v9ARv oRUYtz MYmc Mm,O w4 cwc9c AJ[II w.s,mcncx Ex,aX,rt �.. � xm9ryAA[N a ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 YFM 612.758.3098 FAX w .alliant-inc.com O U 00 Z N w 0 5 0 w W a U) z Y Q Q cc Q w Z Z a O y F a W O W i aW n...ey c.m ry . IN. plan. .p.alncomn.raln A^ca.`d t, m. o nn., nnr d~ carvl.,en and ma, I aaM ua.n..d PROFESSION. Ex01NEp oMa. M. al M. SIaN el YIXNEW[$OlA Y.A9 wrscx. rc oaN llmw xw OWWIY ASSURANCE/CONfNOL DATE IMPUE I ELL :P. XFM-0YFR,99 16 91Ep 16 of 29 z 0 20 40 80 SCALE IN FEET oN�r F0 a`�;j*\N PR PREP" CONS Nat Foa WATERS EDGE DRIVE LEGEND: EISING 2NIp.N 199 PAf040 RMgFl - - __i [REIGN OP p6wK a 0 PKIPI Gml Nam PROIYHD Slay RmR - - PRmos<D uslum mm V l..E Wf IIE pill-QP-q. O EN61NL TREE TO AVOW v/ TlEE Pare idl R� PRE— s .PINGED %T FOCE OW Qe(Mq PST — s — PR010SeD AT IVIS (PINT GA") U MET IXbm,mm fl DND DD - (A TnPC11PAI g6yNGE g00ING WImL IER4 fAVylf. 9 NCICN COGIRICIIGI FIIIR.VIR 0 'NO - a ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 6wN 612.758.3099 PAE w .allianFinc.00m r Q Z O U m Z w y � ~ LU y IL 0 Y 2 Q Q Q w Z Z a O N F a W a W O ¢ x 3 a w 1ers, ca '«WM. ,I.n Pr. W.M 61 m uM., mR almT u.a Mal o d,l, U-n u SIO ._5 ENGINCER unJv E.M ". f MI of M. SM. .1 YI NCSOLA EW YYR gAI16DNPf WN N.rr N.. OU1L71Y ASSIFtAMCE�C011IR0E PROJECT TEAM DATA UCI.Ko: YPR DRAw N: El PROJCGi N0: 216-0199 17 sIIll 17 of 29 m"as, •• -tt_�scot •_rr=. PWAsavx aW 1 nRY_Nl8- LXJ__ N It I RI u. mNz aA ." T p S 1 rENL: ON 5 W 'YMTCI FM - i .TCN or SLL' rF . - _flr affR SILT FENCE ENGINEERING .ENE INNE - 5300 EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: i � t-F i/ U IdMi'E iVNcR -FC. .IL =- L [] P .1 s,I.PiPb^N T D O. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ��¢< ENGINEERING DEPMFMQIT �� 5301 DBTII®G 1m9 GC 1ME A LiVL 5 - N.S DEEM SSUm . M tl1r a Bi51 YMIGFLdr M NRR P.FER S REiFR ro EW]Idl MD smElpll CINIM1R NVLME CffNro N M WG NMECING GW1M1 N LtWN YqA .V4 M WESOrA CCNZINLICN SIZE FAOSRIX .VN )EaaRR CPIrIR AMNB INI[9]Dt 3. Nl am's s¢ECIm s]wL a AWNRAE rm M rIIE a .EAR. srt mranons. ArU ESINNIED aA1ION a osE {NE ROIN no WimlNs aLNL a mxsWlnm A[Lmm6 m M RNNV.m NUB Axr oanlloN RNI M KPNTID RM5 ANLL REDLRE .Mrid .VAMIK rD01 M W31F➢1 ci RECDRD S A M' 6 HIES R/M LNSr 4 CN M .RN 92 NaCKR UY6'IRUDIBR B N PRCGRF35. s. M eoulDWEs a M LVIo aslwD.Na UOS aIORN w M Plea slNu a nwLr Pvxrao x M RBn PROR ro cvrarNN;Iw. W Dlsrulmwcc avao M asuRam RRrrs. >. Nwcuv PosAaE. Pasm.E M ERB]NG rws. una MO vlln .gRIAM mn ro wP nM NKSE. E xnne.L rD +.rM. Wo AN awloNs N5r e: Pwlmlm. BanND REmncn arart ar wrnc 1orsOE ro M vs.Ns IX'1DFr wsmE. 9. E51/BTiX A VER4WFM .EDEfAIM1E rOhll W NL EYKSm SDLS Nlgrft tNO 5 ¢Y6 CVI I£ NMR.xMM PRDaAaSx. PUN N soox N wsma m E1TRDIHI OErrsE cR. a arm PRBR ro mlaln'cnD.I Mn m Yeas NEm rnoruL o Rms rm Imm sea REYO>M swL a PRarzclm. W Ilor Dwarf ralmW.r NWx M INpI1E IgJr ]prS pl NMI TCF PROBCItlI wR NFAS I. xE ERMaI AIN smrcxr ENnIR rnnEs (amyl PLNE a raruWED AIo x ORRA1Iax PRrm m INO Ny'ILNDNCE K1MrR Ntl MY SW1L a SRIR/LICICr WHINED 1ML m16TRKt�1 K tlMPFIm .Vp M PorprllE spl EROSNX .NS PASSED. I2. Sr PmEE rs aNRD M Nrrl GRPRMI NmErm a O6lV®.Nza no s1OoaMa Pmlecr nErNmOs. wrmrNnxs ArN AOL•cEnr PROwnEs NaY SnrortAnox NN sIDIRIaNER RI.Na]. AS EPBIRIKIIIN ROOE,543 NO aEtlEC1ED SAStV1 0.M1OIKra1 �M IMIGPNm SIIf NMIa6. pE,NN N, Ca11RAC10R IN, MIIICmA)E M] K.E aC5 NX S rEL£SSMr rD RE ,,r, O MO SEp.dr LAIa0. w M SRE. DUNK' M CpIRSE Cf C4MIMIL'IEN. R 5 M 11ESw151NNIT OF M rtam¢/mmDCIOR ro mEs Nr �A mRdlllws Mr RAr a asrm n mrBmucnw .nlmEz .NO/w Rrtl EKMG NO m YT.CaVE MaIEN4 ai5 af11 NO Inai M WIIN RFaIEEYEMR vNrN w M PINK. N Wr a x®FD ro PRo.IDE orrnnc PmccnaN a arm no saL RVRND¢ {. M BP'S 9WL DE P9ECIFD WEr a M PWNR[/WNIRILI(W NO 1MFRMIFD K IEL412M O p@NC 1NIR UMNhD rUCINMN. SEr rpRtS UFNED a1 IEPU®N SLSERr aePm 6 i/] Y M rf11E£ MIaNr. 1} IND Ib11� PCIMIFS SIWI OCW1F M WAENp15 R r1OIBI8E SIII SUw ML ILEgN2 am E�isDao�av o � Ar�wr o'�E rli. �'a"� M sWUEs• PR.clrr. Nu AwL ID. TE rRMt EWPIpr ImIIR) w NO ... SOE SIDPES w rW.L PA4. IF/.WN rRPCR woogs PERPNNIOAAR ro M ROPE m IBr eNx-WNE lF..'E A sNrMc Rauw ro YNNS ERosNx n. NL M 'No"NaL DI CCNSIRICIRRN sxYl DE TIIALtm rgaN EADSGI NMI > b.K a SON,, YL EagL]EN CF gMMD N ML NS.L 1p1FlNIM Sm YW YUl]1 SIWL N.ER NL IXPr/3.9 AIE.S WLM' MmIE1RN 5 DFUYFD IdaR TWN > prx. wlmrENr Sm ND aAO1 al YA 6 RDYIAD RrneN 3 OLK a mYNDrnx a rw mPoxc Ia DEIERAL rF]mGVRr SEED sIMIL a W Wr YN zz-rrx a Im L01 F£R .CIIE w .•PNN• EDWL weNlar Sm P.RL a Irlovr W 2s-uI a IxD Lax aw .eE oR NPRv.m Eau.L (HNIING oom PER sea: nK) LRADN mNLL a Lrorn mE I (nvn ar slRrq • x mr6 Pm ACRE no aRL NY.]MED N N/GE CR IAAINED FWII rm11UIIR SWIl a LO-aJ-m Nk RR KrNE (IMESs P RESiRG110M5 .m0.r) NO INNRPoD lm NO M YID aD. Ix rE1INO airm NEAt 4WL a SEmm M .YA'.VOYR NM WV3M R.W. m. NL 1EW WURr FRDSI:M NU SLYENR @NIWL a.WA3 SNNL a PRSEAr MNAp Cf NINN MBY Ilm M5 MW rwL AIE SrMIYI.ttN K PUEHD CR NrW M rfVPdtIM' .C\9}E4 NE m ILWaR REFEm. 21 SR 91161f1i ca.mlGim WP G Lpla1RUCIR! ND REWNIW PFR.%IUS IRDIN CCW£rPl a maslMCllw Wn a DEcarvclm rxmNN saa r]EIOYmr .NO/ce REPrc ro P ..TON. a IE rNOW TIRE m AKO NED6 10F RWR NO DINER E116 NG L£LErNW AKN ro OMA SIIHLQAIOX. v. MIENNIE oNaox a SorENr LYMIKE NAn swu a aaNED sea LNN mlulawlss w Emx Nor .� vurt a ANn PUIua axaN PUNT mR M N6RULmN a srNRRNm ANo wmw's EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE: SEC'INCN1 TRAF v.W o•ane-n e. MN'c. c.SFN'c L55 U!'Y. WRIONAn. M' OY. LOJL V00EI #11Gi3 ea Nar.us M1VIfS: '. uE.v. nLSR .cO.. PPER r <N un LxNr .+:D Rw.az r r-IEn ..rccm NIx sEaREIn. --ll'IKLE NIA EN?. Wn M. log MT1 YI CATCH BASIN I SEDIMENT TRAP ENGINEERNG DEPARTMNr N@ W 5302A r.trEE wNe¢�� L Pww m un caN31M w OR uuoUllDN. s, . NN . ]eau 4 RNGRLLm As N'MI m NIERCEPr RV1YF. ar w. xE ENROIN fbNR0. INSVLAiIOXS . ISWN IN n.G4 ND WNfMED fq]p 4ApIgN W ME CDMRIG M UNNL ME L Wn ®N W-Ea1AM. mNIR.c1DR w rCUD.[ NErLsvxr v11 rENcxc/RLMms TO cM1I51mN. RawArs NRE NWIYMD M{PYR EIgA'M CDNroRR M Nu•01f NFA 3. sVrrlaEM 1CPE0R sNVl K snK%FOEG TO .. M EERKENdr Cr DOF roPScl rpl DISNRS➢ MFAt m ar a_Nm]Arto. a M 6N1VCIdi ENYI, sl]EPIIE mE OI.M' NNIY M]N RE -GE NO GOON N',ER 1LroRN m TNr 1NE IFIIERN SIZE rMl PE NR TO wD RE-s® sWl u1ER OBmIeW4. AREAS Mr vRL NOT a mREar ro mxsrRucPDx 1Ru]rc vraL RE sEmm IWDDL La zx-rlx • ImE/N z]o LRAfAm w s000m RneRI EEMI (>) LR'K Or ®If PSTNSO. s. ccamc1w sauL wsNL ERosNx coxlEaL avREs N INGIAM w rN5 ERosw mama N.w AaD Nn .DOnaNM RmAn aBm a rEAvx WrNaos NN aa.Dlas a wxslRunlox. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: SDIpf LpI1RR F0.•LIRS 11UO WpC Si¢Olr rAI EMf@B A16.1LY -FERN. rRWNG cDRa nu GunEn srsm6 w smW SRER raErs z RmxlRa PRACroRS YS a EsrAWaEo w xL DowN wmxr PEartERs DF]gE NN VPAbFNr IMN F6T11®C CiM14 BFPL RES NtlLIRS SN.1L RpINI PIAS wIE NNNL nNNunox ws Sea ESAahMm. 3 M rRRING ff M xrsrAMurSx a 44YEN1 @rtmL Pa¢Icm Wr a AD]n m ro RiE.u.r1oD.R sNw-mN Acvmcs saw N uPPAa6 as wl®xI. aE wsvE a gIR1E5. SIGN-1ERR KIMM1 N1S1 (E CaNFIm As WE]4'.5 PmSBE x0 M sEaIENr tw1mL PNcncEs Ius a NsruLm IYYmw¢r rtlm M ACINn B Ca1RL1EO MM.£T. SEINFM @IIR0. (4M:1NE WSr BE WTILLm BEFORE M NIX1 NcwrAnoN EMR Evw E M ACNm a Nor mLmLErE mx1 SNN atNN VIER IMl 4 NO1EC'I(D RI MPROPRAIE ai5 WRNO xsRunNx DNn NL soWus vmN ro1DnYL sea osr]LNNW ro M wEr Nut aF]I sNalaD 5. IYRUMRr Yl SN?PRES whl WNE Si FEIX.E al OMm 6FFCIM1E SPIENr KNINYi NO f/MOr EE N.Lm N 9JRFNE W.hRS. MRIRYq SIaN MrfR DXE'MM£5 9.LN AS UMB .NO QRroFA SSRr6. q1 CpPlI$ ND F/IUES p1 RCgRrRLCI �sNIR.wZS S N 9IEOIII w M RM. RDS. LM.SrMN:ION IF ]. .CgIRYL IESVES SUCH N NMILVG IRMeO NO onEA NYCIRS AS 9ELM1IfD a M atl@R YVGI DE IRD w sla4 » (NM OR SI®m NO Np.4 .CEGMR SrRa . FINAL STABILIZATION: nr L]/Sr e- a rovaa w ➢Rcvc wmR alsr a sraAD Nn rmr.»Arm xro c ulcvn'rc saL wml6 rNN sro 1EanEJrt Nur.Nm 1DvsDE I s amN REYIMD. M CartNCIW NISr m9JlE FNLL SiMOUMr1 R M AIE. M LEMW[10R Y15r sLBYr A Nona a rzwxlNx (WD NMI m a.K Nrm EN•a srNaoAml B CNNEIC Q IMMFR oraR/aPNW (wrrrrR) ILRS ASANED LWIROL a ML CN aa/OIEHD M ialaNNGUHOMAIC FNN SII9WATw. FM4 SlI1RNIOM µy 5OL a5REA1O .CIM16 Ar M SIZE IM.E aR.l [OAflm NO NL SIILS NNBr a ST/®.IZm ai A UXrOION FEMMYL L4GEINK CMR YIIM A aN91' a A R0.'fM 0.E9 M FNiNE PElM1V15 AI4N£ NEA q1 OMFR EgIM1'NFMYFNB aCESYIr i0 PAIXEMI � EINURE UCQ EED9h URRIOI6 MR oRNNPa amcs mxsnRRlm ro oRN. WRR mcu M SINE AFTER caxslNlnnN rs cOLENErc Nlsr a srAamn m ALLWR EROSIM: R Rlr'aRARY sxlNmc. MB slWnuw mo9ol NESEINIA Aro SC.dr (s4CN N Sr fE]!F) N15E a 4YO.fD N AEI OF RO SrIBElur4N: c. FIRECONa.Lr.SITE . . MIO am5 g6 ECIEW W( ME SLBIDR FIRM CCMhr.NLES M9 Enll MnICLRSDW VfY mcclNAnw aw6 Mr RE NO a u4D a Pwwpr eAM aWLm' INNpmEMI BL9P5 sEmn Yus1 a SI/aUZED ]o PRMNI rt FRW eEw r•191E0 aiR NIO M M94 caNErANc¢ OR oRux•DE YAK DSaI.Rc+Nc w-PE ON ro v�rRDE YAms M cluN. our a PERIWEMRRMNs wP a slsewrt ro EE]UOI M a9N m oEYM Lmfil'. SAuoLE EROSION CONIN0. PLAN FOR INDMDUAL LOSS .wea ap �e parz :Oi 3 r� I I wa va.u..rem. ab.svirwa. pcN mw1 N rm<:W Mv. vp/f wctr^9 vONL] vya M. gsLly(nrx mi �x le vvb m.LeL.nrL .r n+^^t P..•N. wra.-.LN.P.Ir G.FeI. -N.-N.- bx. m MLM1r M bq. nWM Nma mf/w i11«a ]x IMw1 qc ]6> a IN mw �Nv+Ner� Y N.^•I. mibrl a051O1� Y Ca�eWNNMMeAN MLM.a .eel .�. •_.• Nn.x ...N.�x ear «N N.PNI. RN. a .Im II- qeP. x.mmv't etl ..rwar v pves^4 • s. um� se .� an 5-mn-I..a uvwNe ew mtl 30D. 5.. w v qn .. cm UP • EROSION CONTROL FOR INDINDUAL LOTS (TTP.) ENGWEEMNG DEPARTMENT FG¢ws 5302E EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: t ECT Ar n xYmRRr /nER ERGI RViMI NNI Ai IF/Fr DLL' pgxL WIpLTD P.WR..LL EDRR' RETM rNEO OR FN1R Ai rplZ R6IAEFYmr - rRasc avxL a REPVRD PRwnv NEx n accuro4s w SCWES IKEECIM DSDIC M RVfRR 5 NJ LDIRR No"'O.M. YOENr PFYDIY - sEDND1r RFmS sbp11D 4 RF1KID NrR E/O1 sMY nFNr. 1NE. NI51 E REWhD NEX L'lygNR RF.O1 YTMNWIEL' DNE-T1NJ ME NFArt GFM R•]NRR IM SW11EMr RLYW< M NN4 ]rrW M Al F"N" OR nRR rAmc rs m IaIIu REWHD ALNL a vlEs4n ro m.raN YRII IXBTRO OYLF. PRpMIFO. MO SFEOm R1M M MOM2 sEm IY. NN mN:fO AS LHCIm Rr M ENI]IRIL. WMiDWR 6RW. Lp51M1C1O1 MrtLNGS - RIXSI WIBLRI.CIEN ENRMR m 4 WNIMm N ULO rWM' 6MIIRh riF£ 6 RUR NO F.D04O 505 NR1Y m Rmxr N svcls rPACRNo DR oWm 1rMlsoDxr a sEmEzn ar M s1IE s. REIIW4 IY Sr LEEY, - ;r ipRS SNFIL R RFYTID real TEY WAf sERKD 11rYf IR]IIL R1bJ2 M MI RF]OIE M NANO AMIE .VBA NIn BFD1 I4WYiENR. SrIBLRFO. M W WO ADPEID .AA 5 m R Ca�D 1C] �1 TMX sv (O YpIMs. rw1 MFA sNNL 4 K/.VA .NIR rEN1ORMI VEfEL.MMI .ErI E.Br omosm. n M CWM"G U N5r VIE4r ING M LOBr11FOR 91A LMl tA. SE.ON (]) D.YS WRNG MIM1E M.BIPLCISN .VO NrNIN x. IRXxS N]FA A RtllrNl fhNr tlrwRR mw a s rocs x x. Nw]B ]. NL Ir®m1Rxs No IPRImaola mrouccRD exec mBIMc Bx YusM a amRD w NerNG Am m� RECgOS arsr a wn+m NM M SNtm RmJms a PAw rNRgD1Dx mO IVRrtaWR ACIMIY 91YL IYILEE: A wrE rxD rR OF rl50Ecnoxs: e. xrAc a wKw(s) exaul�w rSrtalor6: c. Rows a NaglalaK, uNw1DPIG RmvWENDaB.a FOR, D. GGRNEGM rNEN OIOWDME a'1FS. 11Yf5. ING PNrc INNM1aLVEE ..(:NINES E. D.rE Nm AYDSNI a ML RNIF.LL DEms mFA1ER ,Rea In Nw (01 . El .NnEs) F WLNENR OF CW WDE O M S1PFP N REWRED x PNI.A. n . PMR a M ¢MVIRCaRI 9C 1WE aRRiaC fMN srgl]].1RN, M RENR RERV6 w DOm P.R15 OF 91E IIRECINxS LI FIR, 5lbNOEG IRM w' 4 MWcm ro aIR rtR uamx auE roNl xrs aErN wsaDIDED oa ro FRoxESI OOIIIO L'MRIIMS M REUIIm NrscclBNs NID YNIIEW]K4 uDn rxE PI.¢ N soox N R']NET rcaas Ar M sR w mm ro R9NC wrsrRx BN. woELLr1 LW ES FIRS! POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES: M WIINCIaN aWt NNEYm! M Fg1gMG NIX . PRENE. WNNEAIaNI IFAWNFS CN M aI[ 1. SqL MSF: LOUECTED SOEMr. ASRYEI NO tlMCIC1E = Gs, FIMIN. aaT P/]EII. NAYIF. RV( Cp1arRJCIRM NO WRIIRI Dmaa NO OIIQ rN1E5 M51 a DBmAD a PmMFErnr No Nrs m.mLr Wx Ime. oa osN aaNEumrs. i. NNx.INLt' 5 WIFIRnL OL D.t4•' lE WII NO AINI WNM5 4NTINP35 M5r a NpPanl S10RD. NYURXC SCaOWr CNNFANNNF, io NOhMr 10S. REARS aL OR(R $IaINE NO pgeSN � ExtjNx.�/5 �'C WSr a N CpHW4'E NM YKI q�Y. auurR6. 3. mrNUMic N LVII a ooNE mLrx m mvDl NN A YaWE rAAUW snm NlamEo NO CaMm Rr M CMBIE L(NrtaY%IUL. NPLFi WSr a WNINIm .ND rNC NnvE1Ri mosrn a. .. W ENGNE aDMASNG K NLC..m w $rtE ENOROImO1Ra.YIFT 05r.OGN A .BN M inB'nL vl • � 3D�tY. A52YL O - ex Posrz a Ke12 f / +anc .s ren w:. � - N'1 Jo- FRI _ CER 9 • � I x swro =. DffY N�IOR SxxL m.S1WCI 9L1 PUY IU IIMI M 1 STM as Ih [' 1Ni YUY W m m ti 0.Qt]'O Uf ,RRC Sll N;EVA: I e' ER, IN, w�R.u'UE z. RO c• Wr -o ArEA] li' YNNIY .RC.K r. S]M. tiNY !9 I SILT BOX SEDIMENT TRAP .MI_IR ENQNDRING DEPARTMENT 5302G °NT-,( Rv F °P p`M\N PT,°N PREP CONSS N°T ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S. Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758,3080 NUN 612.758.3099 FR w alliam-inc.mm Wrepr .erll4 IWI NOs Rp.<M<oNon. rNW . R R.eR<na er m. NO, m 0. RUPervabn oM MW I PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER -da, IN. I... of Me SION, .1 WNNEWTA YARN MUSCII. PE ume y<.nee W. 011ANTT A�IIRAMCE/COIIiRp, SNEEF 18 of 29 o.� LEGEND: UTILITY NOTES: - >- PROPOSED STORM SEWER I. MISTING UTUTIES, SEINICE LOCATIONS AND EIEVATONS SHNL BE VERIFIED IN nELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. -No- PROMISEE) SANITORY SEWER 2. WINTNN A MIN 18' VERT SEPARATION AT N1 PIPE CROSSINGS. WATER .AND YNDARY SMR UIR TO PROPOSED WAITRIWN MNNTNN 10' VERT SEPARATION, LOWER WATERMNN AS NECESSW , PROPOSED GTCH WIN 3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. • PROMSED SANIT t MANH01£ M PROPOSED GATE VALVE 1. PROMOE POLYSTYRENE INSULA1pH FOR ALL STORM SEWER AND WAIERU N CROSSINGS WHERE VERTIbI OR HORIZOMAL SEPARATION IS LESS THAN S'. PROPGSm HYDfEWT EXISTING CARE VALVE 5. ALL UTILITY WORK WRHIN THE R.O.W. SHALL COMPLY MEAN THE CRY OF CHANHASSEN ENGINEERING GUIDEUIES. E%ISTNG HIDRANT 6. NOTFY fAPHER STATE ONE G A8 HOURS IN AWANCE OF NAY Mill WORK. IXISTNG WATERMNN 7. PROVIDE TEMpWi 1RKFlC CONTROL IN OOMPU NCE WITH MNWT `TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE EXISTING GTCH BASIN 1 yOUTS-nELD WNUK- UTEST REASIN. FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION WHIM WBLK Ross, UISIING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM SEWER 8. NL SANRARY iiisp 5 TO BE 18- DWNETER CONCRETE W/NEENAH R-I6412 GSTWR:. UNLESS NOTED OTHERMISE. IXISING SAWTARY MNNHO1E EXISTING SANITARY SEINER 9. WATERMNN. SEIWES. MD VALVES SHNL BE INSTNIED WITH MINIMUM 7.5' OF CODER. 10. WATER SERNCES SNLL BE 2- CI TYPE l[- COPPER. W/ 1- CORP. STOP : I- CURB Bo%. EMAN P IO N EWER SEM'1L 11. SEWER 8 BE 6- PVC10 MINIMUM SCH MINIMUM 2% SLOPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. �Z QCpN`95_PJc�12. WATER SEWICES WTK MY BE ON ARE IN SINIE AS SEWER SEIMCES PRONDED THAT A 21- VERTRI AND A 0 0 W 60 120 401 FOP 13_'Vl CURB BOXES st L BE ADIIISTCD TO M ELEVATION OF I- BELOW RNISHED GRADE WHEN IN GRASSED ® AREAS WHEN IN MI LATCH PROPOSED GNDE. SCALE IN FEET 14, ALL 6- AND 8- IYATERMMN SHALL BE C900 PAC. STORM SEWER NOTES: I. MISTING UTIUNES. SERVICE LOCATONS .0 ELEVATIONS SNNL BE "RED IN RELIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. M4MNN A MIN IS- VERTICAL SEPARATION AT N1 PIPE CROSSINGS, 1 CON1R/{TOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ILL PERMITS PRIOR To THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 1. PROAOE POLYSTYRENE INSULATION FOR ALL STORM SEWER CROSSNGS WHERE VEJTIW_ OR HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS LESS THAN Y. 5. ILL STORM SPWER WORK SHALL Coll WITH THE CITY OP CHANHISSEII ENGINEERING GUIDEUNES. 6, NOTIIY CAPHER STATE ONE GAL 18 HOURS IN IIIVNME OF ANY Mill WRK. 7. PROVIDE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL N COMPLMNCE WITH MNDOT -TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS-nELD NANURL- LATEST REVISION. FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION WOHIN PUBLIC ROW. B, NL CASDNGS 51MLL BE NEENAH oR APPROVED EQUIL. / APPLE TREE LANE ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758,3080 MNN 612.758.3099 F. vrNN.alliant-InG. roln Ear.6 c.NNay .o«mcano.. PROFESSIONAL WA Ia.A e1 M NINMESOTI m J V1 Q F Q W IL Y Z 2 Q cZ d C F J J W IL D that this plum «P unemr mY NGIaae a I NSIHEER unEar Shut. el WWI MUSCH. PF Wb IAvsA ft OE4 M. MIK wAWll ELL Poll NJ: 216-OIM 1 19 aRET 19 of 29 ryX S' N, .DR>,T WATERS EDGE DRIVE \ \ \ CB 212 x\\\\\\ WER SCHEDULE: \ \ 15 0.M HOPE 119 Sr IS au Noll M.CU 1® 1a am HOPE M.0 199 is nM HOPE Ina Sr 15 N HIE IRM 193 15 ko I DOPE I Moo ♦v Is 15 nr 0.M HIDE IXIPE MIN Y]T 4.r 4.54 15 am HOPE rA 4911 15 0.51 HIE ".2a s2A 15 tm NODE Cat 1BZ 15 2M HOPE R.21 tt.ti 16 0.M HDPE r41 IM 15 IN) NoRB 114M Br EXISTING -- HYDRANT — — F i! K" FES 502 CBI« 203 \ y / APPLE TREE LANE \ EXISTING ® � YDRANT CBMH 300 \ IYORANT 20] 1 CBYN 206 A 1 J I m �� sAN uH8 J HYORAHT� 1mI a JIM 1 m n N' J \ \\ HYDRANT \ \ \ sAN D \ FES 2D0 \\ ` \ COMB FES BOO Y FES I00 J �_ CONN 10 SANITARY SEWER SCHEDULE: SAN MH a1;1 LEGEND: — —>— PFGPoSEO S,G1N SE'NER —�— PROPOSEn WJIfMY SflYEF — I — PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED CATCN BASIN PROPOSED SWRARF MANHOLE M PROPOSED DATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRWT "Mi TING; DATE VALVE EXISTWG HYDRANT EXISDNG WAMRMYN EXISTING UtTC11 BASIN EXRTNG STORM MANHOLE EXSTWG STORM SEWER EXISTING SNJDARY MANNOIE EXKTMG SNEDAT SEWER 2'XW KEYWAY OCS 501 CAST INTO WALL BY SUPPIJER (N. T. S) WIN WALL A D IN CONSTRUCTE 110E FOR 24' RCP FIELD BT CONTRACTOR ELEV.= COITIONAL µ'S WEIR WALL VA EZ. '-0' LONG - 6.0' ORIFICE e01E FOR 21' RC '- 0Y 1 �ORIZGNTAL ELv= CRATE Xs o ¢' INSTALL 9f NMER GRATE SECPON A -A VERTICAL PRE -MIXED fONQtF1F RAFFLE WAIL WATERLESS INSTAL PRE -MIXED WEN FEASIBLE. SET INVERT FOR WRET SEALANT WA1ET£SS SEALANT PIPE BELOW NWL TO IMPROVE PIPE ALONG WEIR ALONG MEIR WALL AND COWR AND MINIMIZE SLOPE AROUND WALL AND MH MH J NCTION TO gOMME,, ..UNCTION TO PREVENT LEAKING PREVENT LEANING j�I��\ L ELEV=906.00 L.L L6— Ol PIPE WEIR WALL (TOP EL: 903.1 Za.O OF 21" RCP a-5 o L]9 6.D" ORRICE EL 902 ELEV 900.5 INLET PIPE 12' OF U' RCP 6' MIN, M-5 O 0.00E E 902.00 1 0' MIN. SLAB 6' T MICKNESS 6' AGGREGATE BACNFILL/ (MNDOT SPEC. 3149H NCO.) OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE WITH CONCRETE BAFFLE WALL \ EXISTING HYDRANT l otx,.4olik `l PREp�M`N �N NoS �Z 0 20 40 BID SCALE® Ov ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 3)0 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MAIN 612.758.3099 FAX wxW.alliarR-Nc.com J J ra F u a � cc 0 O g o W a Z Y Z 1E Q a W Z a IL Y IF i i W J W 3 a n ME I Mre6Y cw11FY 1. MN pMn. o. aPpIr., •n+ M K6 m. N', .1 " a Mp III—, A.. a p.^Nb„na IINII I I u.« e SIQ PROFESSIONAL uMp M. lo.a of IM I. SI.A.ENGINEER SIaN of YIMNESOTA WRN MUXM, PE Mb Upm IN Will ASSURAMGEICONFROL ICESIOK: MPR OMWX: EM PPOJECT Iq: 216-DIM 20 S.'E 20 of 29 CONTRACTOR HIXE FOR 12' RU WEIR WATERS EDGE DRIVE OCS 601 (N.T.S) /HOE FOR 15' RCPi \ � a%NFTAL H3 7'(,N)a9•(H) % O-0LONG ORIFICE 6'(W)x6'(H) ORIFICE EL: 900.90 A. O 12" (RATE- P1 O 12 XMMY R G+A cc XEFIICAL INSTALL P_�C ON A=A 01 R�1F B�.F WAII PRE-MI%ED WAIEALE55 WSTALL PRE -MIXED WryEN FE :P gT INY£RT FOR OUTLET SEALANT WATERLESS gALANT PIPE BELOW NW To IMPROVE PIPE ALONG WEIR ALONG WEIR WALL AND COVEN AND MINIMIZE S-OPE ARMNO WALL AND MH MH JUNCTON N SKIMMER, JUNCRGN TO PREVENT LEPXINC PREVENT LEANING 1 ELEV.90A.m7-(W)W(H) ORIFICE EL: 900.90WRET PIPE EL: 902.3]) 16.1Y Ci 12- RCPWEIR WALL (TOP a-5 O SmfE6'(WTA6'(H) ORFOE EU se9a99.2014.r 4DIA,� PIPE IO- IS' RCP S ODOM.EL '. I EL-5 899.a0 YIN. YPB TiICI(NE55 6' AGGREGATE aACKFl (YNOOi SPEC. 31W911 MOO.) OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE WITH CONCRETE BAFFLE WALL 0 w b SO 01 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND: —I— PROPOSED STORM SEWER ► PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN IS PROPOSED DAMN BASIN PROPOSED SAXi MANNOLE M PROPOSED GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT POSTING GATE VALVE E051ING NYIXOAT PORTING WATOtWNN EXISTING CATCH BASIN EXISTING STORM MANHOLE POISRNG STORM SEYIER EXISTING SWnARY MANIKKE POSTING SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER SCHEDULE: STORM SEWER SCHEDULE: MN MH PIPE PIPE PIPE INVERT INVERT RIM STRUCTURE MANHOLE MPE TYPE FROM TO O.D. SLOPE LENGTH FROM TO ELEV S12E BUILD 8dN,1N 8DE MH 11 IXMPE a9 9N.M Msm no N R1a SOR38PVC MH 13 NNI S 009M 91.1 Ma.m Msm O.Y N tl]S SdIffi PVC MH 13 MN 13 1 9 aiuml nol tai Ma.so 91028 N 11.so SORJS PVC .11 11112 1 9 0.mso X31 IIII, M41 PM.! al 12MSERa5RVc MH 15 INN 11 1 111 ODOMIm.11 997.54 smi msq sal I1.m SQW6PVC W � PE�,E otl A, , ``► \wIll, - pt 0 NpT o MRIGB .DUL I. SLOPE P. PPE PIPE FROM TO Rd STR CAST III FROM TO D S LENGTH VEL B DIVERT INVERT E TYPE FT FEa® Ocsem ,5 am Rev MAT mm Raw am I)(S 5M FES M3 12 Sm RCP 1Bso MBm M0.65 am �TAL MH RR CBMH TM R an TOE 1N.W 1.13 SM.m 999.N m9.57 N RIN3 9.M W. AI FESIOU ,s ON � Mi ♦IS III 9M.so man N RA08)-VB a" CB m1 CaE1Hm3 15 1.0 HOPE MSt Lm MCI =is 910. u R 1m CBMHm3 GRAIN am 15 am HOPE I%% 1)6 III Wilm 911.10 N R.--'— A05 C9MHE@ MAIN WGI 15 3.10 HOPE 11100 12m 90A.M m1.05 Basso N Rd -VB 5.31 LBMH soI FEB aN 16 218 RCP M.IN 7.TI M ..90 M9.m smoo N R�312 am Ream FES,m 15 1.m ROP no sm, maso INL]0 i ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S. Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MAIN 612.758.3099 EAx vnro-.alliant-inc.CDm J Q J a m a D � F < � 7 s 5 N^ W a Z Z Q w Z 0- CL N a J W ¢W J 2 F a � xanDy cMItY tlwl Mia plan. or nparl . a Pp R...exon, a ey m. 0 �„e^a �.Iy .w., eln�� P.rvl:m� aye I I o LL GROFESSIO ENGINEER ENGINEER unE.r of M. . .1 S1aN of u1xxE50i1 MARK Iu116Cx. R DeN U.ww Iy OUMM Ry DATE DATE ISSU IGESKMEO' MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NG; 216-01m 21 SKEET 21 of 29 Wi ` Ilk 02 , wV its .. m C rb e 1 ' z r � r s b n V' sit** i (13OHtld HIHON) NV -Id NOIIVAH3S3Hd ONtl AHOIN3ANI 33UI yz I$ ItlIIIW8f1S ltl'Id AIitlNIWI13Hd oaooy�_ VIOS3NNIW 'N3SStlHNtlHO a � < /coo m m y� o Q )IFltld IS3M UH, .. ........... ..... .......... 4q00 og o a - gE� g Ilia i e E '2 E 8 � qqsp.(�p.R■.■tlp.��Ilq.qp.pp_pp.p��Ie.al;��p�p��Aq`qe'ae du.. °J i�. a. yi .J �bW i 8 aa; e3 a8 .3318A888ir36ZB��aA3 Vf Pa�� :MMM4-4:3q mix Mr az q Pl= 11919 a91911 91 9191 9191 P111 TIT, MITI all,M 11 y �0 4 W �j0 � I N o 3 5 � J I LEGEND O (—) Lr 10FF51oM'�mfES lQURrWiRM��)NCIN]5 nE6 AM ARA NOT ROD m Ya W. N-1N1 (YEPCPT YEIHAM) 1A . Y. Y � Tm RWWMWEsw[/Ivol w FAT sm 1n v-N1 O.RX 4MI Y XM I i I II i / APPI C TCCC 1 AYC SEEDING NOTES: 1R1 STALE 5® YK SS -MI. $FFCNf RAZE TO BE 11.5 LBS/AOIE (PRE ILK sEEI YALL W STATE SUED WK SS-M (CRAP ERANW MFpiA) SIDING RATE M W MS IRS/A(RE (PURE IRE NEED). 1RATCN AREA SUED MIX AN STATE SEED MIX 1 262. SEEDING RATE TO BE AA LGSIACRE (PURE Uw SEED). APPLY MEn� PER THE FC OMN= wICH SIDED AREAS WIN Mn/DOT TK J (MOM CERTPED PEED FREE) MULCH AT A RATE OF I Tp PER ACRE MMN A6 HOURS OF SEEDING MUI IWhD THEN BE DISC ARC OED TO KELP IT FROM BLOWNG AWAY. SEEDING SHALL µ BE PIED FROM APRAL 15 - DULY 20 BI SEPTEMBER 20 - FREEZE UP IF NYGROSEDING UTILIZE APPROANAll SAD GALLONS CE WATER PER MERE. REFER TO MI SPEC J FOR PROPER INSTALATKN OF HYDRO -SEED. Al NI SEEDS USED ON THIS PRO.ECT SHALL E CENTERED TO BE OF MINNESOTA ORION BY THE MINNESOTA CROP IMPROIFNQNT ASSO:.IAAON (MCA). STE TO BE PROPARED BY LOOSENING TOPT O TO A MINIMUM DEPTH CE ]INCHES ME SEE TO BE HARROWED ORED RAK FOLLOWING SFIDINM AND THEN PMCKED USING A CIETI-PMCKER BE EQUIVALENT. SEE MOOT SEECING ANNUAL FOR RFEWFNM ... SEEDED AREAS BY WAFERING, RElIUL01MG .AND RFP.WIMD AS FECESSµI TO ESTABLISH A UNIFORMLY DENSE STAND OF FIE EF£6m GRASSES UNTIL ACCEPTED_ µY AREAS FAUNG 10 ESTABLISH A STAR SHAL BE RESEEDED. RERRRUIID µ0 PETRI WHENEIW M IEQTAINE OYYER IS NOT ACNIEIEO. RESEEDED STALL CONFORM IN ALL RESPECTS W THEY SPECPCATIWS. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR µY DAMAGE FB TIE NMK AREAS RESULTING FROM EROSIONµ0/OR EWIPMENT. THE COMMACTOR SHALL REPMR DAMAGE, INCLUDING REGHAOING, RESEEDING. ETC AS NECESSARY. BEFORE SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE MWRS. LOW ROW IHIET TO IWLTRAODN BASH 91AL BE PUGGED DIMNG CMSTRUCTM AND DURING FIRST WILL GROWING SEASON TO ESTABISI IEGETADM, PETER TO ION STALE SEED Nx MANUAL PLANTING NOTES: 1. NSTNL A YIN, TOR SOL. TO NJ- mO AND SFID AREAS EIIE GRA➢E NL SOD AND SFID AREAS 2. STARE ON MAN" ALL NANT WLTERML TILI6 PROW m 1STALATITK 1 MSNLL A-6' CERR 4WERm WRDWXyB NRCN µgMD ROOT SAUCER OF NL TREES 5pARED FROM PLWI LETS t. PANDNG SOIL SWAL CONSIST OF llA SIAEC1 LDWY lOP5C0., PEAT MOSS. PIT RUN SAND. 5. COMPLETELY GUARANTEE ALL WORK FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR BEGXWXNG AT THE OATS OF MCEPTANM, WEE AL pEpLACELENI$ PROMPTLY (AS PER DIRECTION OF OWNER), 6. ALL µTERLLL SHALL CODPLY M11H THE UTESE EMKMN OF ME AIERRYN STANDARD OR NURSERY SR ' AMERGN /$SOCNTEN OF NURSER MEN. ). AL TREE TRUNKS SHALL BE WROPED WIM BROWN CREPE THEE WRAP. .APPLY NAµ IN NO EMBER µ0 REMOVE N M4, B. CML GOPHER STATE ONE CAL AT 651-A5A-ODD2 FOR LOCAL. ALLUNDERGROUND UDUDES AND AVOID DAAWE TO UTILITIES OURIW THE COURSE OF THE WORK 9. SEAMAN ALL M-MT MATERIALS. INCLUDING WIERNG. ORE. THE TIME OF n CEPT.E. 10. CWRORATE INSTALLATION WITH GENERA CONTRACTOR. 11. STAKING AND GUYING OF TREES OPTI.NA, MANTAN PLUABNE55 OF TREES FOR DURATION OF WANRANTY PERIOD. 12. BLEND AREAS OF CONSTRUI LIMITS AT PROPERTY LINES. 1] COMPACTOR TO SUI DESIGN AND INSTALLATION M AN IRRIGTgX PAN IA. SHEEP AND WASH ALL PAIEO SURFACES AND REWKW ALL DEBRIS RESULTING FRO. UANOSCME OPERATIONS. 15_ GENEPA CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE CWXTYMATE SOIL & EROSION CGNIROL SPECIFIDATION FOR DISDURBEO AREA SFABILVAt10N. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: 1. gEp1fED I P RFD IN THE FNOME INm BY SALVE BALER PROWEO . I TREE PER LOT (AS TREES) y YNYYUN/ .rmv 164'MFvi 11M1 R ucur REAPED . 121 TREES SEE CM'OPY TREE COARME PLAN pgpAOEp - 124 TREES 3. ANX&CAPIZ SUFFIERYARD REQUIREMENT EEOWED OREAT PUMPS 9RAEVNm 5 A WLLECTOR ROAD. THEREFORE aUPERI'NN B 6 REQUIRED BWFFRYA D B EEOWLES 15NAL BUFFER AREA WITH 2 OVERSEOry TREE£ A VLSENSIBM TREES AND 6 SW11B5 PER 1. -V TOTE BREERMRD LFNOIH . 17B LF. SONG GREAT PLANTS RWLEVNM AT A W MON. THE BUFiERYNRD MULTIPLIER IS A. THEREFORE, THERE ARE 2 ONERSTORY. 5 UROERSTORY AND 5 SHRUBS REQUIRED TO BE PLWIED IN ME BUFFERtARD AREA. PROADfO . 2 OrERiTORY. ] CONFERS. 5 SHRUBS Fo aE�Ew °",PRv "p1 � 0 30 60 120 MULE IN FEET ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 812.758.30W MAIN 612.758.3099 FAX AAA.alliant irc.wm I M.My urllll YgeifitNion, a prpa.M q m a aYlr AU. m IANDSUPE AN Ma MESA e1 M, MINNESOTA J J a ¢ w O_ z a J a z O J F. a F (n W m ¢ > O to LL W H ¢ IL z } a Q w Q IL z U N J z w z ¢ 5 IL Awl IMe plan .Yporl .. w m*W my HITSna Mal I xllEcr ana. SINa el WRK KKMBECK, PLA, .WA NN Ilrnr xe. WWL11E ASSURANCE/CONTROL 24 INCI 24 of 29 z 0 20 40 w SCALE IN FEET V",J\01 otv",( 0 \Otl 1401 & WC 2� I A U�--- LEGEND 0 WATERS EDGE -DRIVE 04�P IV If- 2-11 2— 1— is `4196 ALL—IANT i 233 Park Ave S, Ste 3W Minneapofis, MN 55415 2 7583M 6 2.758.3D99 FAN w alliam inc.com LU x 0 U) z 5 IL z 0 P w uj M M D 0 tA LL. w 0 IL Z z m ul 2 cr 4c IL 2F z 49 (L 0 w w z UA z w M IL by —d.r mr d.1, IA"oMb AECT un.r "Mho y la's! I tm of MINNEWTA QUAUTY ASSURANCE/CONTROL 26 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE EET EOMMd1 NAME/SOFNIIFIt NAME f� 16Mtl6 a u n fi<rNral latTrea 7Sa.W stnl2MTmK, xovroml U 1 U KC Esspesmuill rF qul True /WmhodadmdiolOn lissorTSA F5' 28liI. Bi3 SVaigrt Trvnk HOV Emlth ! ! A NRertlmh/BeWlanipa 15'bl.lY Slnigrtrrunk,NOii 13 3 All R AYWmn tlaru Red Maple/AoarFrtenrarYi'J SuuN 2 Qil.W Sa,Igu TmN,N9V4attll I 1 3 BD Red (lalh/Que.rANIa 7 ow.w straight Trunk, No v-Cutd EaYbMTlau n a a Ara. nNrc/NNn Mpa mm Full ram a i All All, ► Auwtalxrc /Nnus Man BM. Bae full Form u 2 a n 19xsam Flr/Abies balsulNa rht.Bae full Form a H 6a. tlakNINSNum /Pfruaga3oderub ITN BBB Full Form 3 IN 6! BladhillsspuO/Piaagauudelem rhtW Full Form n ! a TA Tei Arhor ita B ht BAB Full Form IAr0aINNsr1aBB AS 2 a A JapNlese Trueulx/SYdW10110i 1 W.M Oump FNm 3 a ) rN Peesee HVdmnRa/HyManl8PNMAlNa'6Ngiaori 1 ow.MB [Jump Form L a E a Autumn Brl111a1m SeMmberry/AmedaNAkra IFlon'AUWmn bllllahhr< BM1t B6B Elumr Fprm 9nY n n aoPd/COn1ENdma lsantl' MASRaaaM.specRN./xmrslnup'Sherwoad0NrhplNY 7pllonmm. Mn.S. h spm/Splrta)aponln Kean Flab' 1 a niper/lunlpems satlrc sould =�.�A�H.�bumumNWmumtdl�m 2CdN.ta 1 n uniper/Jump us rmpulomm'BalligE 3M.mM.An H.VlbumumNWmumtdlo m �,r,. IahRMadV IS 12 b 12S Sal f0ersferfeatller Reed Grass/dahWosxs: RINI Frcrmr 3MI.ma. 31 a a seE steno wpmmaDMi1Y/Hemer9a111s S411a Srlprema' 13N.omt NOTES: 1. WDSGPE Si CiOES KIT INCLUDE QUANTIES PoR FOAK)ATIQN PUMMIIKA; BN INAN BELOM. z. awamEs ax Pw+swERQEne usr Qua2rmles. SEEDING NOTES ", A~. 5•=^ ha.' W $TALE Sam Aux ] U SEEON4 RATE TO K S LBB/ACRE (Ni UK SEED} aeam.ttN uXa en. ut W STATE SEED W ll-M2 4F[11D MR TD E M IaS/ACRE III UA SEEDA Me W STALE SEED I } 212 40iND RAZE TO BE )S IHSIAoW III UK 9101). TES=Ni SEEDED RUGS NM hi IYPE J IItC1A CERIFID Reil FREE) 11i Al A RATE 6 1 Ipr PER ACM u— {B Rq.R9 CF 5[EM1C. RIILCN 91M17 Noti n dY Ng1CTND ro INV IT rRLY ML AWY. 9EEONC SNNL K MRm FRLY AP11 IS - JRY 20 OR 9EP1EL9n 2O - FP¢$E UP. E Nnff,,S fdW DTU2E A"I'"YoNAMLY %O DALLdS OF M1R FOR Atl1E REFER To w)DOr uFf Jaa FO( PRYER NSTNUTl01 of .nee -SEED. NL MALICE SLEW UAD rM TINS Pou i OINL M CERIfED TO M Cf aSfE90TA MCIN BY TM WNE90TA CRY aAOYENerT AS900A1101r (MOA} 511E TO M PREPNIFD BY LCOYNW 1ffYJl TO A ANNMW ODM Y S NCNB. FIRE an M NMD NaD OR FARM FaUUNNM' SLIDING Ali INNER PA03D M9RD A OAT-PAOM" OR EO uA,,W. 3FE ki SEEDerf NAII FM REFulQ12 MM. ffirFD FLEAS BY Y1Fal4 � Me WF ANIND AS MCE4MY M ESTABLISH A 11fOBLY DOM STAR Y TM SFE F MA$Y$ Uum AC'®TED. ANY, NNA9 FAYm To EnABIIDI A STAND SNNL K MSfEOD. REFWTUM AND MMAOm R OEWR AR IEOTA"K COg1 Is NOT AONELSO. MSEfONC 3NNL CC M N NL RE9"1 ro Ti mEOF1c.LnCN9 TM ONnACTY SHNL WAR ANY DANAGE m THE NM AREAS MAILTNL FRCP EAp4rM MDIM EoUlli 1M C TRACTOR SNNL WAR UMAX. INaupN6 MaACN4 MSEEPR. ETc MN AS XSSANY, Ni SIGNIMANT DMAa DC0.Ni Rai ro Mx STUE 9® MR NMUAL PLANTING NOTES 1. NSW1 f• IK raP sat ro NL sa0 4D xm AREA$ M YADE ALL M e A SIID )FLAB 2. STARE Iwbc ALL N/M wIERW. Numa AM)R To RsrrlAnw. J. MAN' H ' [dnl SMIEOfED WOIOiO 1MD1 MYM NXI) 9NA'W CF ,, 1F£ES BNA, D FRpI NMF BFM A, Noss. A SOU SNyL Cpx561 OP 11:1 SLIER LbYI rCVSCI. PFAi YOBS. M MN S•I10 S. AT THE NY fAVAM1IEE NL aqN Ppl A VAL OF pE YEAR B IRRANNe (AS AT ME cT CF ACCiYTTARCf. aME NL REPL`LElrM19 PRQR'TLY (IS PU. DIRECT, NA OODNIA 6 U. EARD FOR $NUR LYMRY MM THE IAIE$T Nalplr Of nE aMltll'NI $Tabitl RN NUREERY 910Ch4 NEW.W ASSIXSAMIx Cf NA9WINEx. ). Al 1RFE TRINt3 CHINE AND R BINM CLEFS 11FE RRAP. U. f IQNNIEA VAX ONE ACE IN Ali N aN-OMt FOR lDGla10 AIL LMUXAURo uu16 No R.oID na•Q ro uNns auEc TM NURM OF nE aaN. 9. AxXFT NL RANT WIERNL( N6e0NG MIEIIRa• UN1l nE nYE Cf Mi 10. COOMNUE NSTAUAMN MITI CEMDIK CMIR)CICR. 11. SrMNa AND GYRY w TI6EJ ("T"NuL: M"I'm PUAfNE55 OF 1PQS FOR NNAMUI Y NMNNr), PBYe. Iz 9D11 FLEAS OF, C06M000CN UIR S M PN)PERN LNES. IS WNRACIM IO AARY LE9.M NN aSPULA N OP M aMMTIN RM NM 100.T W.WIE iCM OJiMe SCO ND SHRB NF/5. YO ND sIMR NsRUNT nu m tR w 3EPNATE 206 a5S RAa MN Y M EauLL sEPrArz Naml IErtR FOR NsmEla OrIAM aDRME NRI QIIpRrL InMRACIOR. M1hE sFm NNAs 51w1 Z aR SFnAlu1E zOMS. IRBWnaR aul n1Es N sLEOm MEAs sIRNw M Rmucm M US )aM sNU19 CONr .MTER ME FRFr 2 rFMS O 6TNWSNMENi la. SMEE➢ MO 'N)AI AL PAYED SIIREKE9 MO 11EYOh NL OEBInS RESVLnxa iNW 1AMFa:WE YFP-O'9M5. IS. 6FHOVL CgD TN) I i FIX1Da TIE , VAI/srNE s. a FRa3DN CaNTR0. 3sEOFlurpx FaR OSTtNBED NRu svalurAmH. ENTRY MONUMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALP t•-F :I FIRE PIT DETAIL PLAN zz 9CNP t•-IE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 1 REWRED -r 97 TRUES, SEE CVgPY TIME CP9U[F PJN PAgSED - 97 1REE5 2 Mi eI REQUIRD: L T PWNS B UNMD IS A COLLECTOR Roi INENEEWE BIfFERYMm B IS REWIRED. 911MWMD B REWIRES IS001 9UFFEn MFA Ali 2 UiERS Y TREES.. UNCERSIORI TRUES AND 6 SHRUBS PEP 100' LF. WFK BUFFERY.NO B ILImN - 661 LP. KdIC CpUA) PWNS BYA£'NID REWMD - la g9S1gfI. 2) UTCEAIVrv, b pM95 gp•T[D• - 14 PE BMIRT. 27 ULU6IDRY. A2 4M95 TE FEAST PRWERTY UK 9CNN OF IME SUS41 HUTS A AAW USE 2pIE TpBSdE N1rFET'ATu C 6 REgABEO. Blf)FRYMp C MWMS 20' am. NRpI MM NIM S GVgPI TREES, 6 ltrpEA9fg0 TRUES. MO 9 SNRI189 Pp IOU IF WT& NRFER YMO C IEMN - Ma U. C,T UIpAI AIMKE REPIFED - 9 OWNSWIFr REFS, l9 u16JERS,NY TREM NID m SlN INS AOCm• - 9 OTASTON Tai 19 VXORSTO(r IRKS. NO 23 SNUBS • WM6ER SUBSTPVTOR RATE: r CONIFER - I OrERSTOa TIME s' CONUER - 1 UNCERSWIlY TREE AIM IINIU1x)1f SNBWEDIMI e Ni MR Amt Fasec FlYPa / L SCO7 MY Mxf ma It_FOL •. \ ~ 7 e-Iw '4 11, -M PILLAR MONUMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN B 1•-F zx aFFIRE PIT AND LIMESTONE OUTCROPPING EXAMPLES l EiPuP Pulte- a ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3030 NNN 612.758.3099 FAA vFww.alliare-incmirr, nenfiT .enirr Ina, Ni. P r P•cn;. ..Pun P.•W,•a fer un'I. m. ii . ea a.,a mar u.. a uxoscae[ U. m n. A1. $[cr NA[sor $mla or RINx�r 1 Bran . B., WAM A=WANCVCM"M BY WIE DATE tsm BtLYIO IN BAg1M JB FIRM2.T Ma 2lsolw 2E7 SME 27 of 29 IIMaM'nV14009 wwnr[ WINRYM a6O! WYNAMi� Rw.O �R AL BALL9 0MU 0 o'er 131 ROOT STW( S1CLI((1RFF SCitE]4ACMRF1�IRWY..Mt �� 4 „CYmrmnnnno� a N� n n.mE®n�n :aoen®n'"v4vm ""ate` t��.+l+n000a.dwvw. avwtua�nwnxmwor .+urtwdmnnmowetr YINIMIM THEE 9PME9�aEd1 �a ua®awns uun�enar.am®m � w.A.ottav®w mw.o.nm.r..A i 4NE PUNnxc rcT.VI ME g �''" """"�"� ENGINEEAWG DEPARTMENT "� 5.709 PLANTING DETAILS FOR riPIOAL W ADUAL PLANTWGS �.•"'W.7s"S•"'�-aBA' � � a ,o' =gym' �nam� a �u :amr.m.i m m c cu ........... M 9(5}T1NP2 ey�y�eYAy�_� r� —i I41Lm SIA¢� m .dim v i°� � Y=J'_nIG IREE M '" xlU RMI NT MOTECTM MTA0. (OPTNYI 2) �w�mi"a�.av s'wfeu�+ei � -�;rm lw- r� ar vG 5� _ STM¢IE / GIY1G KTIi Rol® hW BIE MA1C¢AJIi�lCCS�BSn RA! � PVNIING DETAL mom- r "T NNQW . M OIwxACYN Is z¢c a MFAIQ 4MIK IX11E4E RA M ATU¢ RAN4 POII S-ss TG-m BEm¢S' fta s m m mw.aarx � NOIf: ®� eENSfD: Fl1 NAME ENWEWIG • R T?140 DETAILS FOR }la G ,ENC\SPECS\B310 OF➢AaIYFNT 531U SIEEP B40RE5/LASS KO PLANTINGS 7. lei 'sT.i�:�ew �® U 44� m4 ° /f/ d ®�iR i'emr.ee od Gm4n a ur11R e.a � IB' tlll 11,_ - 9Wl trlmCk9 � j�� VIYTY M4TM4d 9a6 �r •� a �'• ='m wtfx MSG �•im �i8iv �� RYI MpiGd i RMK STRa Q}e-in% x .�..e�-p'n..... �.�m-. •• .�"e...'.' dam. �. .� � � � � �.,`. ,Iru.....omnoi my R.mwr m +R moa+u d Inn sno. uw R. atR IENID. FIo�{trl MMC¢ �SSIY�1�ru�u -2 1HT m � BETAL ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 AwN 612.758.3099 . w .alliant-inc.com Y IZ Q a F- ri) W 3 I MnpY ptlllq Ilwl IMa�On, ap.e111eaHm, npwl pFmM N s a ti, mY Qi.ael I, i - QM Rwl tr.ry t ITE u4oSCME 1RCNSte. uM.r IM SO 1 M. 51p1. of 41NNFSOlA . gtl e"UM. RA, ALA OW 11[wa Ila OWIIf1' A�BMR/COIII110L slr 28 of 29 ■ I vR 1 I--i — YS WTL�TB / ON � aw 9 'eVV WROT NN FDF a` \� PRV 0z P�E�" GONSI 0 30 TW 120 tgOZ FOP WALE IN FEET WATERS EDGE DRIVE aNiIDT. I — /— OIIROT E I N d y�O o TNPANESPTF DEPT Dc S. RiDUT_CP-WA'i I PEkT .4a. Iv L 1 STATE HIGHWAY 101 APPLE TREE LAN / r ai \ xA I ii i '1 I' 71 ^1 Rr I am ppp ifi _ ✓ P 1 I 1 m of 1 LEGEND: DM AY PINKING (:MACE PARING O PTBVATE W-SWEET PINKING O PARKING SUMMARY w-STREET 23 PTMAn DTMENAY (i/IWIF) 154 RIdJ1TF f /)/I.fY� 1GA 70r& Aff V PINKING 351 STALLS Nite- a ALLIANT ........... 233 Park Ave 5, Ste 30 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.308VAN 612J58.3099t www.olliont—inc.com FJ J F M m 7 W y > 0 g 0 W (L m 2 R Y X cc W Q �< L W CL g z W Y z cc W a 2 a Q. � ..bl cMl o NKI INl:glnn. P��P^ � N m. E✓ .n. NM mn . G.1� IM fd MOFMIDNLL ENGINEER u dw Nn Nam. of Nn 51aN of ..K." YMR R PfS PE a. Ile.nu b. O[SIGN(P. I/R ourx: pA PN)AGT Iq: 21"1" 29 MEET 29 of 29 WEST PARK KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC; a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property Part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 24; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 19 minutes 43 seconds East along the North line of said Northwest Quarter 338.00 feet; thence South 25 degrees 26 minutes 43 seconds East 128.38 feet to a point on the centerline of State Highway Number 101 said point being the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence westerly along said centerline along a non tangential curve that is concave to the north, said curve having a central angle of 09 degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds, a radius length of 621.15 feet, an arc length of 99.73 feet, a chord bearing of South 74 degrees 12 minutes 13 seconds West and a chord length of 99.62 feet; thence South 79 degrees 38 minutes 53 seconds West along said centerline and tangent to last described curve 163.44 feet; thence southwesterly along said centerline along a tangential curve that is concave to the southeast, said curve having a central angle of 19 degrees 36 minutes 53 seconds, a radius length of231.87 feet, an arc length of 79.38 feet;. thence continuing southwesterly along said centerline along a compound curve, that is concave to the southeast, said curve having a central angle of 52 degrees 18 minutes 23 seconds, a radius length of 127.60 feet, an arc length of 116.49 feet, a chord bearing of South 33 degrees 34 minutes 37 seconds West; a chord length of 112.49 feet to the West line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 01 minutes 33 seconds East along said centerline and along the West line of said Northwest Quarter 362.74 feet to the South line of the North 660.00 feet of theWest Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 24; thence South 89 degrees 19 minutes 43 seconds East along said South line.430.13 feet to the westerly right-of-way line of Trunk Highway Number 312; thence northeasterly along said westerly right-of-way line along a non tangential curve that is concave to the southeast, said curve having a central angle of 11 degrees 42 minute 56 seconds, a radius length of 350.00 feet, an arc length of 71.57 feet, a chord bearing of North 64 degrees 07 minutes 43 seconds. East, a chord length of 71.44 feet; thence North 16 degrees 17 minutes 03 seconds East along said westerly right-of-way line and not tangent to the lastdescribed curve 360.83 feet; thence northerly along said westerly right-of-way line along a non tangential curve that is concave to the east said curve having a central angle of 17 degrees 30 minutes 47 seconds, a radius length of 981.48 feet, an arc length of 300.00 feet, a chord bearing North 20 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds East, a chord length of 298.83 feet to the North line of said Northwest Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 19 minutes 43 seconds West along said North line and not tangent to last described curve 118.28 feet to the centerline of State Highway Number 101; thence southwesterly along said centerline along a non tangential curve that is concave to the northwest, said curve having a central angle of 20 degrees 33 minutes 03 seconds, a radius length of 621.15 feet, an arc length of 222.79 feet; a chord bearing of South 59 degrees 19 minutes 43 seconds West, a chord length of 221.60 feet to the point of beginning. AND Lot 1, Block 1, GATEWAY NORTH, Carver County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as WEST PARK and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public ways and the. drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 20 Signed: Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA This plat of WEST PARK was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 605.03, Subd. 2. City Council, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota By: _ Mayor Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Pursuant to Chapter 395, Minnesota Laws of 1971, this plat has been approved this Brian Praske, County Surveyor By: COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that taxes payable in _ day of , 20_ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. Dated this day of Laurie Davies, County Auditor/Treasurer Eric Padget, Vice President By: STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF - COUNTY RECORDER, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Thisinstrument was acknowledged before me on by Eric Padget, Vice President of Pulte Homes of Minnesota L-C, a Minnesota limited liability company. 1 hereby certify that this plat of WEST PARK was filed this _ day of County Recorder Notary Public, County, Minnesota By: My Commission Expires SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I Dennis B. Olmstead do hereby certify that this plat: was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary surveys that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this _ day of , 20_ Dennis B. Olmstead, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 18425 .STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on Notary Public, My Commission Expires by Dennis B. Olmstead, a Licensed Land Surveyor. County, Minnesota 20_, at o'dock_.M. as Document Number day of 20 20_, and said plat is in MAY 18 2017 I ALLIANT ENGINEERING SHEET / OF 2 SHEETS CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 06/01/2018 1:24 PM Receipt No. 00379427 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Pulte Group 3350 Peachtree Road NE Suite 150 Atlanta GA 30326- West Park 2nd Addition ------------------------------------------------------- Park Fees 68,400.00 GIS List 205.00 3% Public Improvements 6,464.61 Street Lighting 300.00 Swamp Fees 20,721.91 Arterial Collector Fees 6,784.80 Sewer Hook -Up 12,438.00 Water Hook -Up 40,194.00 Total 155,508.32 Cash 0.00 Check 00050927330 155,508.32 Change 0.00 CITY OF CHANHAS3EN 7700 Markel Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax:952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone:952.227.1180 Fax:952.227.1190 Engineering Phone:952.227.1160 Fax:952.227.1170 Finance Phone:9522271140 Fax:952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 Fax:952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952227.1310 Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Fax: 952 2271110 Website WWW.Ci dwhassen.mnir June 24, 2016 Mr. Art Plante John Arthur Homes 12100 Singletree Lane, Suite 171 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Dear Mr. Plante: This is a follow up letter to our meeting which took place on Thursday, June 16, 2016 to discuss issues associated with the development of the site located northwest of the intersection of Highway 101 and Lake Susan Drive and southeast of Waters Edge Drive. This site is complex due to the regulations that govern it. The site has a total area of 7.26 acres. There are three guiding land uses within the site. They are broken down as follows: • Residential Low Density: 4.26 Acres • Residential Medium Density: 1.87 Acres • Residential High Density: 1.13 Acres The northerly portion falls within the Shoreland Overlay District, which limits density as well as hard surface coverage. The proposed development is a good transition from Mission Hills Senior Housing, Gateway Apartments, and the surrounding single-family homes; however, there are shoreland and storm water ordinances that have not been met with this current proposal. The following issues have been identified: At least 50% of the area within the shoreland overlay district must be maintained as open space. This can be achieved by reducing the number of units and relocating some of the features within the open space by moving them outside the shoreland overlay district. • The hard surface coverage of the overall site is broken down as follows: o Residential Low & Medium Density may not exceed 30%. o Residential High Density may not exceed 50% Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Mr. Art Plante June 24, 2016 Page 2 Based on rough calculations, the average hard surface coverage for the site may not exceed 34.24%. Calculations based on the breakdown provided on the plans show that the overall hard surface coverage exceeds that percentage. Reducing the total number of units will add to the overall greenspace of the site. • Section 20-485 of The City Code states: "Impervious surface coverage of lots shall not exceed 25 percent of the lot area, except as follows: (1) Thirty-five percent for medium/high density residential zones..." City staff is willing to consider recommending approval of a variance if the applicant can demonstrate that the storm system has been designed to adequately accommodate the water. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 952-227-1134 or by email at saliaffa.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, Sharmeen A]-Jaff Senior Planner SA:km Enclosure g:yp1m\span-k1ing.dmx ( Shoreland Overlay District/�• 1.4 ^^^^ -r'.'� ; / SHORBLAND i I �L64 , ow w NX .►.M (!K. 1 \ � wvw+s REVDENTIAL LOW OEN MET MEN I241A E)1 RE DE MEDIUM DEN (NET DEN5i 4B MJ D(NET DENSITY M J ACRE) APPROVED FOOTPRI ILLUSTRATED IN RED, FOOTPRINT IN BLUE, AMY 17 ADDITIONALPARNING SPACES i APPROVED FOOTPRINT ILLUSTRATED IN RED, NEW .FOOTPRINT IN BLUE. APPROVED FOOTPRINT ILLUSTRATED IN RED, NEW FOOTPRINT IN BLUE. 4rY i �\ITT'rTi"E.fl HEADWATERS —DEVELOPMENT— CHANHASSEN SENIOR CO-OP 80-UNIT CONCEPT SITE PLAN §Ra- �- Kee �k� �l - Covn• 0 cC ' e� 55 �L}i�� Au 4 �" HEADWATERS —DEVELOPMENT- CHANHASSEN SENIOR CO-OP _"-UN T _ CONCEPT SITE PLAN tr�E, ga- (8) Ig A\ / �JJy 9E5�JEMYL�EpW DFNYTY f�ET LO/SIiVH: bE 1, ``\\`V� mM MFED IMET LfXSrtY A1�KNE� Private streets serving residential development with a density equal to or greater than four units per acre, commercial, office, office industrial, or mixed -use districts, must be located within a strip of property at least 40 feet wide extending out to the public right-of-way or covered by a 40-foot wide easement that is permanently recorded over all benefited and impacted parcels. Neither the area within the easement for the private street, nor the impervious surface of the private street shall be included within the calculation of the lot area or lot coverage of the lot in which the easement is located. Once the private street terminates, the area of the easement and impervious surface of the driveway shall be included in the calculation of lot area and lot coverage for the lot. Lot means a separate parcel, tract, or area of land undivided by any public street or approved private street, which has been established by plat, metes and bounds subdivision, or as otherwise permitted by law, and which is occupied by or intended to be developed for and occupied by a principal building or group of such buildings and accessory buildings, or utilized for a principal use and uses accessory thereto, including such open spaces and yards as are designed and arranged or required by chanter 20 for such building, use or development. (18) (20) Here is the other ordinance dealing with density: Sec. 20-505. - Required general standards. (c) Density. An increase/transfer for density may be allowed at the sole discretion of the city utilizing the following factors: SITE AREA CALCS C V /, wTDx E]B1NG i Ru,a EASIWG //_/ // : /7/ T{/a� ,I J RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (NET DENSITY 1.2-4 / ACRE) RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (NET DENSITY 4-8 / ACRE) MIXED (NET DENSITY 20 / ACRE) IDNMcdS1RKT SRFmYN1IHISWARFPPEn RUIIMMG SIDEWAu DM'EEMY 3TIIEET fiAII80 d mpul TOTAL RWpFNTIALl01V DENSDY INETDENLTYL2-A/AORQ 6.M[ ELM E® M29S D SL323111B12 IIF3LDD2DElREa�1EDB13Ea1NET0ENmK/AQF7 MAD zm yAE U,SO L 8= A�INETDM2M1Y20AOFl IL® A01 Z. 0 0 Kul ASAER SITE DENSITY: SrtE DENSLTv 20NiNGDITTEI T PROPOSEDUIRTS DEVEtO1ABll IAND1A,CgtESI PROPOSEDDENSITY ALLONAKEUNITS RESIDENTIAL LOW DENsm INET.MTTL2-A/ACREI lb ! �3.a �E ]m IS R61 DENiIAL REALM aNSDVINET DFNSRTAE2A[Rq / LS2 II ill I3 MIRED INET DENSI1 VACREI 6 / Ll3 T .31 a TOTAL O / [A ` ' I, fi25 TO SNORELAMD�Y. SNOREUND0VE T , TOTALAREA 17I,2M V Imo{ DumlxN 43"9 EE4 ��ld 1awc� USA. ��— I � f A-L ® la ® cn r mow. Nlxsr.aRlEa fE.IPINPI.at 1b MN E�Ww W Pay ENy� NrnANN ammo® y W W xy OC y �Q xx Z aQ z0 0 ,�.,�Ea,R,TN„TRbAAN BRLKGT,NI. tlIREMN! WAA M®MEUBr YECR IKEAM Ntl4R�g1ANI Ml.„M,A.1 DLEM9ED RY.fE59pVL DNaEER nA`E�E W R PG /A wrt0;'bt6 •[xbEo M2q SITE PLAN LEGEND: msuE4umTTAL suNu carEaEIe PAVE3ENTAR SPEar®rva oRwuD ___— PROPBDY1fE QRmAlpglf2FA5FF xoEE.R __�A__- Qo.ITP art DUTIER WRA3EAPPLIfJDLESEEPUH J TPIFEG WECIRMMLIPo10W9 5 AACPOSTASSE3R[r. 9ElOPORAENOSREDILm ND-ACCESNIIE S[R! Ii=10 PMdOlf glElAlE Sf.510P cP = ccas2cr cw vARwc aver lE pEVp,p REVImON SUMMARr an; mN LAND USE PLAN GOFRIER STATE ONE CALL b� 4V8@LR'M C2.1 zsa o ma dm 90909T naz'L Alnr Avr e`OZ,,,` 1°1L`vc "°1 .. 61T1 YsJSS m o xaarw OHUArea auma3Lw '"'M ADJ2 Y :IXV'!S`Jm>'IdJ!]79T69 v S f / '03 'buuaeui&i3 Y&Ma+a'�8 ddinalojw 9wz,m3wr /�Y/J a.s Wmm� ��.J� IvjvosaAwIdL1oi10 2109'Z w+i33Hs 3uu i33Hs :a3A3nens 3iw m�M.aeu®�auv m� i se3naaieonix�m� �v�s eauvuraroo avw rnuams3a rasrax uva AJMG AO dO1 3HL ONIXWV4 S83NL0 AS LM OVl! — 0 rNn 'pmou MuLt2wo ssalan `p0003 `mvm "ems um smouaa . o. :SNOLLN9moo T S ouyt b UIIVONtl.LS i '506'oN S'Ili `Mimd �£ 103 8uuaau!8ug V 8u!AommS aomApv Aq 'LOOZ 'MgwMdaS pmep Aan S J iling-sy mo!Aud iad uoaeuuoju! Aanms pae uo!leu!uumap Ampunog £ p uogannsum 8umu!Eaq L azo;aq io a1!s s!ql uo am io; suogenala nq;o Su FuL lap uago Ala aqI uo umogs amigo; ioglo ouo zseal le 31aago pm gmmgouoq 1eg1 rill 'Aanms ,i sM uo papuwd Ore gauoq oql of Apo melw m Oqs mogeeala aqL 'm!s s!qy uo aoganAsuoa io; moyenala 8umnau2ap m am moA io; Vemgoaaq a !Aad an a !s a o A dedlodol a o uousa. m amos pap o101 eq M 'm. qI ; q 3 R . and of 'aml 10l maz aql o1 amoq aql ;o mar aql mog mogsnala 8mnoyS 'Z 'Weaspuw j dOOID fogey _,_^ _ 'AaagerJ gal Aq las s8eg aqI nd aml (gnlg) adols dams;o doI oqI 8uumgS 'l :SNOLLtlIIMI V 7IlIOM d0 gdOos 'etosauutw `AlanoO mnreO `aBPRI Aan7 Mrel'£ 31001g'6 Wl :NOLLJMsgQ'IVqg'I S1 D W \j � � wra E»snc wrdEwsT]q SITE AREA CALCS: Av I I s ryr EONING 06lILILT SFIECOVEIIAGF ISWAAEFFFII ll ��77Y LLLIII��lll lia � DB ® 60 p MAILFXG ADFWAUI pWLWAY 51RfET GAZBO GRE[N am TOTK Fn�Mw6r Mw 0.FLOENMEIOW DFNSOYINETOFNLIT I3-VACRq amp ATD B.B1 2kmLEE 0 $333 FBS,@ Ov_�il 5)�� NFLDENIIAE MEDIUM OENLttINETOENLtt Iy ACRE7 ii3m L7$ zU24M Li533 45E0 N.161 am WY.r IVBN� WMINUMN&W2WAME) MAW @ 3.A45 0 0 35,IS1 AAfB 0 k"', 5 ice SITE DENSITY: �� LIF OFNStt ZONINGPSTMLT PRMWDME% OEVFLOPABLEUNDACRFS GROSSAOA M PROPOSEDNEEDEN50Y PROPOSEDCROSS0EN55FY ALLOWAlK.EW S O16 CD IAVFp TOT GF I) IDNITS/DFVU . ND) (IMITS/GROSSAOIfIGfI RdOEFRUEIOW OFNSRYINFTDEN51FY 1.1-V ACI[I ZS / 3]I l]6 1.D5 6W �lS ' E RESIOENiIAIAEDIW OFNSMINFTOEN5F1YAm ACMI �.. / 1_ Sll In 400(NFTDENLtt OYAaM S / In i31 S31 n r Al- \tl / fi11 , L2f 6 S3l !0 SHORELAND OVERLAY: \� F ' SIIECDVEMGE ISDIIARF FFEII /1 �J �,F/�� WAFIANDOVERUY BDIQ� LOFW m DAIV NYAV a m MFN.Y35 G LW EQQ] IR]M �5 • I B /0 'I �P,P.Vj — V SHOm1NDOVEALAY "Ta EJUS RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (NET DENSITY 1.24 / ACRE) RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (NET DENSITY 4-81 ACRE) MIXED (NET DENSITY 20 /ACRE) 1l1b 0 �, `) O\L\ G SITE PLAN LEGEND: q}1pFIE PAYfMENf A43PEQREOIPADCNYYnVD _ — AIDFFRtt UE e G1A@NDgIREN3EE NOTES -JT RAI3PM WrrER rnE]E MR31'xEESEF R.w FS�\-- I ' rfGRC DRfC11DWLMIMNS SNYI MO Pmi ASffYdY. LOP pUNNGS PEQIEO. N<=AaEsasscx IV=NOPNBLIDgD:4NE St. STDP LP=[gPACf LMPnRYlN. DXLY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL ¢gExs�rEaElNioPG • cVa sa o b3 W 2 oz =W IxN z a= zv 0 �ncenEr mAr me.uN. svalErwrox.w PEwRrvAA exmulEner YEOA VIOEn w�lrAMLYOAr Irtmm wosrsaaw eNVRF3v V 1mi 11E I. W S Oi r1E Srwrt Cs R n movie s.�.a Ram ISSUFJBII W 1TK SIBII AM REVpmM81YMRY LAND USE PLAN C2.1 -'AM A� " 3 / wTa EKErtND %MTa Em*nD 0 7 ZONING DLSSRIR Slff mVFMGE ISGWRF EEETI WI M 9"AM DRIVEWAY STREET GAZEBO GREEN SPACE TOTAL RESDENIIALIOW OENSMINETDFNSML2-4/ACREJ 901m T.2M 91"S n.w 4T3 94,545 m.85Z RFSIWNRALMEWUM0FNS35Y(NETWSMf+WACREI "SO ME 25D9 14.1R 0 SOBS 8L831 MRED(NEEDENSI WACAE) 3L450 @ 2•66B 0 0 3L,947 0,6St TOTAL: mll" 317.143 96BY 10 m 11 V u\ SITE DENSITY: Ap °I V Q c I SNEDENS,W ZONING gSTRKf MDENT4LL DENiIVINUMSM L2-VACREI RLV WN141 NEWLM WUISITYINFTDENSM♦V ACREI MkFDINFTDEMLIY ]y AWlE) "AL PWPOSEDMEES DEVEWPAWI DACRES IAMB MEEECUVEIO M in 6 2.57 6 L13 38 / B6l / PROPOSEDNETDFNSM PROPOSEDGRO55DENSM A=WABLELMIIS [MrM/OEV.1AN0j (UNITS/GROSSACREAGEI TAl &W IS m In 13 5,31 W �� S'n s.31 AS SNECWE E(SDUAmFEm BUILWNG SIDEWALK WIVEWAY STREET GAZEBO GREEN SPACE TOTAL SNORFANDOVERLAY ALW 5,10 ]. 3l ni D BL3E6 1(6,E39 ^ TWAL: 9A, 3E6,® SAM Imm 30 /A 1,06 ,a RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (NET DENSITY 1.2-4/ACRE) + RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (NET DENSITY 4-8 / ACRE) oMIXED (NET DENSITY 20 /ACRE) W ® GD y a3HSRR. su31Ea R.IWRt PAHLME aH OYHa PHR.� W aii 5E5 6,nd lw-�ce �Q� I 'c� s wro"o 7 -, �} 60 w a Z 2 O Im -"� inERE9r C9111FI EN1i,HBpµ, SPEC IEG,ON, p1 pERMR yM 4R®MEP BY YE OR UOEN YY GHCI If.EHI®GRPE49q VL BGREEA IOTA 1H l.M'SOf EIE ST.lE6 L SacKef� R Pwd 'rrt m'3f��6 u�xHru M8l SITE PLAN LEGEND: GsL uswnAL suuM ' CEb19lP1SM �MlE CgICREfE PAVENFMAS SPEWFEO(PAD 0R W3LD ---- fTpP6t1r11E WI6A3U (XIf1ERGFE NOlE9 -�T jfDOiPdrt O.3RER Wl£IE APP111'l&E.4EEPW! EAR\-- I ) TPIF£1CDgEC11LWN ARROWS S� RA REV 3MMAR CC Y 1�V Rp=OPHM IEWESHLPMGSR0.EED CP=N nTWPAPF ON-r GCIRERSTAMCMECALL 2TY LAND USE PLAN C2.1 (1) Density within a PUD shall be calculated on net acreage located within the property lines of the site in accordance with the land use plan. (2) The area where the density is transferred must be within the project area and owned by the proponent. (3) Density transfer in single-family detached area will be evaluated using the items listed in sections 20-506 or 20-508. Density transfer eligible for multiple -family areas are not permitted to be applied to single-family areas. (4) In no case shall the overall density of the development exceed the net density ranges identified in the comprehensive plan except as specified in policies supporting the city's affordable housing goals. Intention is to recommend rezoning the entire site to PUD. Sec. 20-485. � Stormwater management. Impervious surface coverage of lots shall not exceed 25 percent of the lot area, except as follows: (1) Thirty-five percent for medium/high density residential zones; and eventy percent in industrial zones within the Lake Susan Shoreland District. How do I transfer/cluster units based on the language below? See. 20-508. - Standards and guidelines for single-family attached or cluster -home PUDs. (b) Minimum lot sizes. There shall be no minimum lot size; however, in no case shall net density exceed guidelines established by the city comprehensive plan. Density, net means the quotient of the total number of dwelling units divided by the developable acreage of the site. Developable acreage excludes wetlands, lakes, roadways and other areas not suitable for building purposes. Roadway means that portion of the right-of-way improved, designed or ordinarily used for vehicular travel, including the shoulder. (12) (18) (20) If we have to exclude the area of the easement or right-of-way from the overall lot areas, can it count as open space? ... we still have to count it as hard surface? Would it make any difference if the private roadway was within an easement vs. a dedicated outlot? (8) Private streets serving residential development with a density equal to or greater than four units per acre, commercial, office, office industrial, or mixed -use districts, must be located within a strip of property at least 40 feet wide extending out to the public right-of-way or covered by a 40-foot wide easement that is permanently recorded over all benefited and impacted parcels. Neither the area within the easement for the private street, nor the impervious surface of the private street shall be included within the calculation of the lot area or lot coverage of the lot in which the easement is located. Once the private street terminates, the area of the easement and impervious surface of the driveway shall be included in the calculation of lot area and lot coverage for the lot. _ F]®IgAaillYf V �1PALCONFG11011 I FXSSTWO SNEWNR _ _kREnu�IwncN:. uPnorv.c Wsn NG PROPOSED MSF ,,LP x1G�Aff 9.m 4 al% S6T41 sF Z m nLLPAVEA,8yT5 ZSB 4 O1% Iy60/ 5F i$RX ALLNWPAVB.g3FS 3 .6634 414% 2M6064 %^ TOTKSITEM6S 36Z,m5 g loam 6 Offi SF Imm INiFIINOEASW EgmNGOpryQTloNIOF3 3,SF PRaPosEna>rranory LSB,M 399 SF afiMe% ]sg3R34 aye% g�O w1 pRoF.) 1N,O4 u t13% t14PERMO0 TOT& _ _ 13B,3 SF lib% GUOmZONING. RIDtZ-t AOlES/WIT WO-a-S,,MB UMT WEE) PREPOSEOZONNO PE Rw 45 W ITS/AQIE PROPOKU FRONT YMOSETB4 KTUMVATE5TRE17 MET PEIBIIEROWSET6aIX: MET SIOEYAROSETR 7.5FT Street Oararg 396® 4 SO4k Ibua lnrvg 16,M 4 24M Worvdk Urnm, 1%1Ti4 Sm ORYewq Cnnte 53,YE4 3.TF Twasm n 34m54 m m Tad SftU nm,(WNmn Sb MHE, gderdks6tralls) Im,M4 lZ.Tt r.roa c I G ows PnxM w GASYGrtupmm r WnPntl ras.Mr V) W 2 o Z W m N v� 2 QZ 2` Z U 2 O U a 6 XEREBY(LR11%N TINW, YEE0BY ME RE AS WEW BY ME YMOFA MY UNDENW COR NR DULY D TNr nENnNEEY SILICENSED PR FES ENGINEER ES lTFONAE IIxoEM iNE uws.THE sinrtOF UNDENTNE1 twin n.Eg9a End FUMSIOFI SFIMANtY CONCEPTUAL ME PLAN A CL.O MS'fING SIC &K TP OMOWWN � ITEAREAGLOL4T1W MMNB MnNG PROPOSED hURfN�O Mu 91®9 25 B Mg 24M ALLPAWEM 1589E a 7AW1 SF 2Gf% ALLNU2-PAYO.)-NIS 35 M Sf 91.fK MtM2 Si 5SB% •. TOTALSlamM 382,m55F Mft %ZWS 9 mm i "IMPEAYIOIb smA IXIBtING O3NDTIIXJ 9,M7 SF 2q PRmmocJllI 1 ,. SF fAfM 1 Q fi39 f<.f% .FFER M(LXVSPRCP.) M,3M Si ILN 'APSRM TMf _ _ 1 ,. SF 41^ _ gg EN .B wuT:�B11.:F ST'ECrvIShGnxpwm ,• mnrFll Cl) W 2 OZ wN I NI^ co Z a Q x Q z x Z U 2 O 3 i XEREBY CFAIIP" M.i iX6 R.W. SV EDWMF ORND'RWW.V >REVYtE... YNOER ADNECT LuENSEiD PR.ESMnT ul• ER LICENSED V40FESSIOMF.L EMDREER NNOER ME IAWS OF ME ST11E Ge ESOTR q- OMIM ret xo� WMDWMN ND-L2-4AmII T ISSUE/SIRMRTAL SUMFMRY RNp-4BAOR3/WT wrt oEueromry M%® PFIOPOSm ZONING: PW RMD ♦B WTS/A PRCP05E0: FROMFYARD5E15AOt TOPWAMSTR - x fT PFBIICRM SEIB.LX: 3R fT 9MYMDSETBNIX: 25 FT TOTALI.flTS: 38 RPYISION SUMMARY M stm.tfv—W 39,®SF 1GBY. SdewA foyer 21.3B2 SF S9 Dneeww Qven L3.1539 an TGW vte Q.e�e �;2,ms 9F MN CONCEPTUAL Toe9 Srte CD.er$e(waha Stmd%SldewNEs 6T IS) MIM SF 21.M 1//� S1f_T/E PLAN B V xa L.O l t�^ SITEARFA GLL TMS. ( VON DOSING PROPOSED BUIdNGp�IDy,(A; 9.0995E 2% %A2ff 2tft ALLPAM%M M5 LLM 7aa 9 2LM ALLMQ PAVEN4A5 35 MSF 9T.M 1%mv %A TOTALSITEAREA S Zoos ff MM %Z005ff Mam IMPERMMSlAF IXISTINGPNOTIW 9,%7SF 2M PROPWEDW pm ]K5 9 ASM lnS 7 ASTL DFFERMa(OEVSPRT.) LS9.IDSff 43M iMPERNOUSTOTAL 1G,A4ff ASM U) W 2 Z O W N z 2 =J w Q tea= a== Z V U O U XEREEY CER, TXRTONTPJN. BYECRIG.I 1REYCRT WIS PREPRREUIONA DP DN TIAMA DDL' SUENSEDPN1/MOTUT RMRWLY LICENSEOPROEESSIONOL..g DR UNCEP ME UW80i iXE SiRTEw E 80T/ R PGwR niE-p IM6 1 w—. v' CUIMDMNING: RM L2-4ACAES/LMT ISSUE/SUSMRTAL SUMMMY RMD-68A0FlV JIT wTE OEscRIP1pN MC(fO PRUPDSED20NING PID-RNO �'i ABUiiS/A0E 'i, PROPOSED: FMWYAROSEI6VXTOPRNAMSTREET: MFT P CRM EETSAIX: MFT SIMYARDS� T.SFT TOFK UIIY 3B REVISION SUMMARY wTE CESCRIENCX Rreel forerq "'MV UN Hvls CDrereg WM ff 24% LdewdY Wvg f9,ff6ff 0% Glve•al'GVMg 1A,�SF l% Tow SNe (avers �DGS ff =a CONCEPTUAL Told SRe (wl[hP s d% Lde"ks 6 Tr•Is) 1DL,499 MM SITE PLAN C2.0 CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Community for Life- Providing forToday and Planning for Tomorrow MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Todd Hoffman, Park Director Don Nutter, Fire Marshall Jessica Archer, Building Official Jill Sinclair, Forrester Stephanie Smith, Engineer Vanessa Strong, Water Resources Coordinator FROM: Jenny Potter DATE: December 5, 2017 SUBJ: West Park 2°d Addition Final Plat Development Contract Construction Plans Please review the West Park 2°d Addition final plat submittal and return any comments to Sharmeen A]-Jaff by Wednesday, December 13, 2017. Please use the l 1x17 copy of page 5 in place of page 5 in the lamer plan set. I /, Y V D CQ�MwM s . 1.�� ( lSCe PH 952.227.1100 • wwwAchanhassen.mn.us • FX952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Meuwissen, Kim Sent: Friday, January 05, 2018 2:35 PM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: Recording information Description Date Returned Date Recorded Recording Number Vacation Resolution 2017- 10/10/17 9/14/17 A651689 48 Vacation Resolution 2017-49 10/10/17 9/14/17 A651690 Kim Meuwissen Office Manager +O CITY OF CHANHASSEN PH. 952.227.1107 FX. 952.227.1110 �-✓ www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 00 • • CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA DATE: July 10, 2017 RESOLUTION NO: 2017-49 MOTION BY: McDonald SECONDED BY: Campion RESOLUTION VACATING PUBLIC DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS ON LOT 2, BLOCK 2 AND OUTLOT A, GATEWAY NORTH WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.851, after two (2) weeks' published and posted notice of the hearing and after mailing written notice of the hearing at least ten (10) days before the hearing to each property owner affected by the proposed vacation, the Chanhassen City Council has conducted a hearing to consider the vacation of the public drainage and utility easements legally described on the attached Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, following the hearing and consideration of the proposed vacation, the Council has determined that it is in the public interest to vacate the public easements for right-of-way and drainage and utility easements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen: 1. The public drainage and utility easements legally described on the attached Exhibit A are hereby vacated. 2. The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, water pipes, mains and hydrants thereon or thereunder, if any, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto. 3. The City Manager is directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Carver County. 4. This resolution shall be recorded prior to but concurrent with the recording of the final plat for West Park 2"d Addition. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 101 day of July, 2017. ATTEST: 6/z,z# odd Gerhardt, City Manager YES NO Laufenburger None McDonald Ryan Tjornhom Campion N� Denny Lauf6riburger, Mayor ABSENT None EXHIBIT "A" • Public drainage and utility easement, described as: All of the drainage and utility easements embraced within Lot 2, Block 2, and Outlot A, GATEWAY NORTH as dedicated on the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, recorded as Document Number 451279, together with the permanent utility easement per Document Number 206358. • 0 • • E CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA DATE: July 10, 2017 RESOLUTION NO: 2017-48 MOTION BY: McDonald SECONDED BY: Campion RESOLUTION VACATING PUBLIC DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GATEWAY NORTH WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.851, after two (2) weeks' published and posted notice of the hearing and after mailing written notice of the hearing at least ten (10) days before the hearing to each property owner affected by the proposed vacation, the Chanhassen City Council has conducted a hearing to consider the vacation of the public drainage and utility easements legally described on the attached Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, following the hearing and consideration of the proposed vacation, the Council has determined that it is in the public interest to vacate the public easements for right-of-way and drainage and utility easements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen: The public drainage and utility easements legally described on the attached Exhibit A are hereby vacated. 2. The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, water pipes, mains and hydrants thereon or thereunder, if any, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto. 3. The City Manager is directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Carver County. 4. This resolution shall be recorded prior to but concurrent with the recording of the final plat for West Park. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 10'h day of July, 2017. ATTEST: s zllt Tddd Gerhardt, City Manager YES NO Laufenburger None McDonald Ryan Tjomhom Campion Denny La enburger, Mayor 40 ABSENT None EXHIBIT "A" is Public drainage and utility easement, described as: All of the drainage and utility easements embraced within Lot 1, Block 1, GATEWAY NORTH as dedicated on the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, recorded as Document Number 451279. • is 0 30 60 120 SCALE IN FEET I 1 I . I G� H, Jam;• w I L_ 1 ti� I A 2p r V J I I I , I ' I ; I ' , 1 1iORPJjS�1��P�_, ` I •_. E�Pt�Rt�` \G f DESCRIPT/ON FOR VACATION OF ORA/NAGE o I AND UTILITY A MENT OVER LOT 2 BLOCK 2 2 N � AND OUR OT A. GATEWAY NORTH 2 L` lJ All of the drainage and utility easements �O embraced within Lot P, Block 2, and Outlot A. W W GATEWAY NORTH, as dedicated on the recorded R a plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, recorded as Document Number 451279, together with the permanent utility easement per Document N Number 206358. 0 OPSt��t�i 700 / i 1 0/ U" 5 ORPEP pjN� 212 �'w oan DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION EXHIBIT Oxy lWr: d..n B- em no a� LOT 2, BLOCK 2, AND OUTLOT A, GATEWAY NORTH, CARVER COUNTY, MN as.: •-. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Nlianl Er g&ftnng, Im. 233 Park A k., 556 5. Ste 3 MinlPa* , MN 15 612.756.3060 k 612.756.3099 F" wmvaflla M.M. em!" I '.-W MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Oehme, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: Stephanie Smith, Project Engineer DATE: July 10, 2017 SUBJ: Approve Vacation of all Public Drainage and Utility Easements on Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 and Outlot A, GATEWAY NORTH Planning Case File No. 17-12 PROPOSED MOTION A. "The City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of all the public drainage and utility easements on Lot 1, Block 1 of GATEWAY NORTH as dedicated on the recorded plat thereof as described in Exhibit A." B. The City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of all the public drainage and utility easements on and Lot 2, Block 2 and Outlot A of GATEWAY NORTH as dedicated on the recorded plat thereof together with Document No. 206358 as described in Exhibit A." City Council approval requires a simple majority vote of those present. The drainage and utility (D&U) easements on Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 and Outlot A, GATEWAY NORTH were dedicated with the plat and with a separate easement grant recorded as Document No. 206358. The figures below show the locations of the easements. Paul Oehme Approve Vacation of Easements: Gateway North July 10, 2017 Page 2 The City has utilities and drainage features located in the drainage and utility easements. The applicant's survey of the area determined there are private utilities located in the proposed vacation area. PROPOSAL The applicant has requested vacation of all public drainage and utility easements as shown in the figures on Page one. The plat of WEST PARK will dedicate new D&U easements on portions of what is currently Lot 1, Block 1, GATEWAY NORTH as required by City Code. r i i� k /. L X, .. X The plat of WEST PARK 2ND ADDITION will dedicate new D&U easements on portions of what is currently Lot 2, Block 2 and Outlot A per City code. The vacation will simplify the dedication of new drainage and utility easements within the plat document. The preliminary plats are attached. Attachments: 1. Plat of GATEWAY NORTH 2. Proposed Vacation Exhibits 3. Preliminary Plats of WEST PARK and WEST PARK 2ND ADDITION 4. Vacation Application 5. Published Notice of Public Hearing & Affidavit of Mailing 6. Resolutions &\mg\vacations\west park pc 17-12U 70710_cc_vacatim m Aoex