The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-12_2018-12 - PUD CONCEPT REVIEWwww T ailhead: Wirth Park center opens to fanfare. B3 Fair Jobs: State Fair seeks hundreds of workers. B6 Awarded by Associated Press Media Editors (2016) WEDNESDAY, JULY 18, 2018 ;4-S1arTribune STARTRIBUNE.COM/LOCAL • SECTION B MINNESOTA LOCAL • STATE • REGION _ St. Paul police draft trans policies Preferred pronouns, body searches are among the multiple issues addressed By CHAO XIONG chaomong@starmbune.com The St Paul Police Depart- ment is joining a national movement by drafting its first policy dedicated to the treat- ment of transgender and gen- der -nonconforming people. The department released the draft version Tuesday and called a public meeting to help shape a final policy it hopes will be adopted later this year. "People of color and trans folks do not feel safe around police, and we really need to work on those relations, so I think that by having St. Paul issue this policy, it's a step in the right direction," said Dot Belstler, executive director of Twin Cities Pride. Some of the guidelines include: police personnel will use a person's preferred pro- nouns; people can request an officer ofa specificgender for body searches "unless there are exigent circumstances"; police cannot remove a per- son's appearance -related items, such as wigs and pros- thetics, unless there is asafety risk; and the department will provide appropriate rest - rooms. Transgender people can also be transported alone upon their request, and peo- ple cannot be stopped or searched in order to deter- mine gender. The policy said that police are required to use the gen- der and name on a person's government -issued identifi- cation on police reports, but will include preferred gen- ders and names elsewhere in reports. St. Paul's draft policies mirror similar police policies across the country, said Dru Levasseur, senior attorney and director of the Ti awgen- der Rights Project for Lambda Legal, a national legal organi- zation advocating for the civil rights of LGBTQpeople and those living with HIV. "We're seeing these around the country," Levasseur said. "It's good for transgender and gender nonconforming people to see that they have protections in their interac- tions with police:' Levasseur and Lambda Legal have helped shape sev- eral police policies across the See TRANSGENDER on B2 Some neighbors oppose a plan to build 200 houses on the Chanhassen land. AARON LAVINSKY • aaron.lavinsky@startribune.com The Lermar Corp. plans to develop 188 acres bordering two lakes, property formerly owned by Prince. Neighbors fear losing a pristine natural area. Plans for Prince's land argued By LIZ SAWYER • liz.sawyer@startribune.com For more than 10 years, Julie Butcher has enjoyed her quiet, dead-end street surroundedby woods and wetlands. The Chanhassen resident regularlytakes her fam- ily on secluded nature walks on a private trail between Lake Lucyand Lake Ann— one ofthe fewremaining undeveloped swaths in the growing southwest city. Now she fears development will dramatically alter the environment and hurt neighbors' quality of life. Lenmr Corp., the Twin Cities' top homebuilder, plans to convert the vacant land commonly referred to as the"Prince Property" into aneighborhood with 200 market -rate and luxury houses. "We chose Chanhassen because of how it felt — a quaint small town;' said Butcher, whose property abuts the proposed development site. "Now it's BCA: Teen was armed with BB gun, hatchet Report says deputies fired fatal shots after Tasers, pepper spray failed. By LIZ SAWYER ]iz.sawyer@startnbme.com A suicidal Chanhassen teenager shot and killed last week by Carver County sher- iffs deputies was armed with a BB gun, according to the Minnesota Bureau of Crimi- nal Anprehension. The report released Tues- day also names the deputies involved. Archer Amorosi, 16, had a handgun -style BB gun and hatchet when he was shot multiple times Friday after a brief standoff outside his family home, according to the preliminary report Carver County sheriff's deputies went to the home after Amorosrs mother called 911 to report that her son was suicidal and threatening her 'is7. ;mile Former Prince Property Lake Luey (y 6 VLake Ann Axboretum Blvd. T CARVER Sources: maps em"m Star Tnbune withknives and a baseball bat, the BCA said. According to 911 dispatch audio, Amo- Amorosi rosi suffered from mental health issues, and police had responded to a similar call at the home the day before. The BCA report saidAmo- rosi refused repeated orders to leave the house, while a Taser and pepper spray deployed through a window were ineffective and the dep- uties remained outside. "At one point Amorosi ran out the front door of the See SHOT on B2 ► becoming a little bit like suburbia hell It's losing its charm." The late Prince Rogers Nelson owned the sprawling 188 -acre site at 7141 GalpinBlvd., where he once lived in a yellow three-story house with Mayte Garcia, his wife at the time. The house has since been demolished, but a security gatehouse remains. Five contiguous parcels have an estimated tax value of more than $20 million, according to Carver County property records. Prince's estate put the land on the market last fab, more than 18 months after the musician's April 2016 death from an accidental drug overdose. Lennar entered an option agreement in May to purchase the property. While its terms are not public, city leaders confirmed that Prince's heirs See PRINCE on B6 ► County official • in arrears on taxes Ramsey board member's nonprofit owes nearly $40K in property taxes. By GREG STANLEY t;re&starileyC"taxtiltdrie,ocart A housing nonprofit run by a Ramsey County Board member owes nearly $40,000 inproperty taxes onl4proper- ties, including a St. Paul duplex that soon may face forfeiture. Commissioner Blake Huff- man, a former Wells Fargo Home Mortgage executive who ran briefly last year for governor, formed Journey Home Minnesota in 2008 to provide housing for fman- cially struggling veterans, their families and single parents. Huffman and the nonprofit own 18 proper- ties in the metro Huffman area and one on the North Shore; another prop- erty in Shoreview belongs to a limited liability corporation that lists Huffman as its sole registered agent. Of those 20 properties, 14 owed a total of $39,673 in overdue taxes as of Tuesday, according to tax records. Huff - man's LLC also had racked up $3,711 in delinquent taxes on its Shoreview property before paying them in the past week Huffman said in an inter- view that his nonprofit has run into cash-flow issues while in the process of selling off sev- eral of its properties. "It's really kind of bor- ing;" Huffman said. "We had See NONPROFIT on B2 ► LATE TAX PROPERTIES Ramsey County Commissioner Blake Huffman and his non- profit owe late taxes on 14 of the 20 properties they own in the metro area and on the North Shore. h11i M 1 SE ... - o 694 � 1 94 o 36 Mpls St Pau( 94 ;.�,.. 494 LP Slate tax J� ,35W13;: p.operties j ., 2rmN.I Source: maps4newsmm HERE Duck soup befouls Webber Park pool North Minneapolis pool was shut down again over failed water quality test. By ROCHEI.I.E OLSON rochelle.olson@startribme.mm The ducks are to blame for the water problems at Webber Park pool in north Minneapo- lis, which was closed'Puesday for the 15th day this summer after failing another quality test. "We're frustrated, obvi- ously," said Jeremy Barrick, assistant superintendent for environmental stewardship. "We're working really hard to figure this out' It appears that the ducks are swimming — and depositing fecal matter — in the holding pond during the day and in the swimming pools at night and overtaxing the natural filtra- tion system, Barrick said. "We feel like the wildlife is the key," he said. On the Park Board website announcing Tuesday's clos- ing, there was an indication that something is being done. "New site changes recom- mendedbythepool's designer are being put into place," the site said. Those changesinclude add- ing predator decoys to try to deter ducks from landing in the pools, including coyotes and more owls. Barrick said they're looking at putting some sort of netting over the hold- ing pond and buying tempo- raryfountains to set up at night and disturb the pool surface. Most swimming pools are cleaned with chlorine. The 500,000 gallons of water from the Webber pool get run through an adjacent pond See WEBBER on B2► B B2 • STAR TRIBUNE MINNESOTA WEDNESDAY, JULY 18, 2018 Ducks get blame for befouling Webber pool . WEBBER from BI where some 7,000 aquatic plants are supposed to scrub the water. The daily water tests screen for fecal matter and excess sediment. The three-year-old, $7 mil- lion Webber pool was the first of its kind in the coun- try. Last year, the pool was closed only six days for the whole season Typically, natural filtra- tion pool systems take five years to mature, Barrick said. He noted the pool is in its fourth season and the intrepid urban ducks may have grown accustomed to the deterrents in place, such as sparkly materials, a single owl and the alligator heads. "We'relooking for humane ways to deter the wildlife," Barrick said. Barrick said park staff has shared their meticu- lous records with the pool's designers, and weather con- ditions and cleaning proto- cols aren't the problem. Park Commissioner Kale Severson said he has encour- aged constituents to visit the North Commons pool, but unlike the pool at Webber Park, there is a charge to use that facility. Compounding the problem in Severson's district is the closure of the wading pool at Folwell Park because ofleaks and the shut- tering ofthe splash pad at the North Mississippi Regional Park Severson said he's heard from many constituents who are unhappy about the situa- tion "They have every right to be upset, I get it;' he said. "It's a great swimming pool, it's agreat asset. We just need to find away to keep it open' Chlorine isn't an option — yet. "It's been suggested," Barrick said ruefully. "As tempting as it is, we want to keep this as a unique facility." Before the pool ever opened, there were problems with ducks and toads dirty- ing the cleansing pond. The price climbed to $7 million from the initial estimate of $4 million Park spokeswoman Robin Smothers said the 15 days of closures doesn't account for the days when one of the pools was closed. Last week the shallow pool, the one with the zero -depth entry for toddlers and non -swim- mers, was closed for a few days while the deeper pool for diving and lap swimming was open Rochelle Olson • 612-673-1747 Twitter: @rochelleolson ELIZABETH FLORES • lizfores@startribune.com Robert Brown, a water resource specialist for Minneapolis parks, tested the water at Webber Park pool in early July. Officers who fired shots are named, put on leave . SHOT from BI home holding a hatchet and what appeared to be a hand- gun. Deputies continued verbal commands and again deployed a Taser, but it was ineffective," the BCA said in a statement. Two of the officers fired their weapons, and Amorosi was pronounced dead at the scene. BCA investigators recovered a hatchet and a handgun -style BB gun from near his body, the report said. Body cameras and dash - camera video from one of the five responding agencies "may have recorded portions ofthe incident,"the BCA said. The officers who fired their guns are on standard admin- istrative leave. The BCA will turn its findings over to the Carver County Attorney's Office for review. Officers identified The BCA also identified the three officers: • CPL Jacob Hodge fired his gun. He has been withthe sheriff's office for 18 years. • Deputy Travis Larson fired his gun and discharged his Taser and pepper spray. Larson has been with the department for two years. • Cpl. Josh Baker dis- charged his Taser. Baker has been withthe department for 11 years. Larson was taken to a medical center in Chaska for minor injuries. He was treated and released. Amorosi was a student at Minnetonka High School, where he played lacrosse and football Funeral services are scheduled for Wednesday at Westwood Community Church in Excelsior. According to data pro- vided by the Carver County Sheriffs Office, the total of annual mental health service calls increased steadily over a 10 -year period, from 129 in 2005 to 384 in 2015. Liz Sawyer • 612.673-4648 Man pleads guilty to stealing donors' IDs House of Charityworker used some of the money to pay daughter's tuition. By PAUL WALSH pauLwalsh@startribune.com A Woodbury man has pleaded guilty to stealing the identities of more than 300 people, nearly all of them donors to the charity where he worked. He used the infor- mation to steal money to repay ill-gotten unemployment ben- efits and his daughter's private school tuition, according to the criminal complaint. Hai Jay Phu Vu, 53, pleaded guilty Monday in Washington CountyDistrict Court to iden- tity theft and falsely collecting unemployment benefits. Sen- tencing is set for Sept. 17. The criminal complaint did not specify the amount of money that Vu allegedly stole from donors to House of Charity, a homeless shelter in downtown Minneapolis, but the identity theft count included a figure of more than $35,000. Fred Fink, criminal division chief for the County Attor- ney's Office, has said "the great bulk" of the victims were donors, and the grand total lost remains under investigation. Vu allegedly used the stolen identities to pay for insurance, a Verizon bill and his daugh- ter's tuition at Shattuck -St. Mary's School in Faribault, Minn, among other things. Vu was fired from the char- ity in February 2017 for disci- plinary reasons, then applied for and received more than $11,000 in unemployment benefits over the next several months by contending he had been laid off and by failing to report that he had found a new job, the complaint con- tinued. After state officials Vu detected that he was being over- paid for previous unemploy- ment claims, he used a donor's bank account to repay nearly $900, the charges read. The bank reversed the payment after deciding it was unau- thorized. He tried to make the same repayment several more times, and each was similarly blocked, the charges said. In December, a search of Vu's home turned up items pointing to more than 300 identity theft victims, the charges read, such as credit Vu was fired from the House of Charity in early 2017. reports, rental applications, copies of checks, electronic banking information, credit cards, service and utility bills, bank statements and a birth certificate. At the time he was charged, Vu was on probation for a2014 theftconvictionin Washington County. His criminal history in Minnesota also includes con- victions for check forgery, vio- lating a restraining order, dis- orderly conduct and domestic assault. In a statement Tuesday, House of Charity thanked offi- cials for bringing Vu to justice, calling the crimes "especially heinous" as they targeted an organization whose mission includes feeding and housing those in need. The nonprofit was founded on Nicollet Island in the early 1950s and has moved around downtown. It has been at 510 S. 8th St, since 1976. Paul Walsh • 612-673-4482 Public comment invited on draft trans policies � TRANSGENDER from Bl country involving the trans - gender, gender nonconform- ingand LGBTQcommunities. Levasseur said he couldfind no glaring omissions or mis- steps after a review of St. Paul's draft policy. "I think what is unique to this one — St. Paul — I apprecl- ate that they have opened it up for community comments the way they did online," he said. "That hopefully facilitates more voices in the process." The department created an online portal for residents to submit feedback on the policy. But Bryana Smith, chairper- son of the Minnesota Trans - gender Alliance, said she didn't appreciate the policy's de£uil- tionofgendernonconforming as people "assumed to be les- bian, gay or bisexual." "This doesn't make any sense at all," she said. "A per- son's sexual preference is not based off their gender iden- tity„ Police spokesman Steve Linders said the draft policy was crafted after a review of a dozen similar policies across the country and the U.S. Department of Justice's guidelines on 21st century policing. Many of the issues had been previously covered piecemeal in other policies, he said, but the department moved to unite them under a singular policy that would inform sworn and civilian staffers' interaction with people inside the depart- ment and in the community. Chief Todd Axtell "made it a priority to take a hard look at all our policies and make sure it aligned with our values and best practices," Linders said, adding that training on the issue will also be provided. Police said that no partic- ular incident prompted the change, but some local LGBTQ activists couldn't help but recall the controversial case of Chrishaun"CeCe"McDonald, a transgender womanwho was imprisoned for manslaughter for killing Dean Schmitz on June 5, 2011, after a brawl out- side a Minneapolis bar: "CeCe McDonald is the poster child for police violence against trans Women of color, , Belstler said. Minneapolis police announced its transgender and gender nonconformity policy in 2016, saying at the time that no event had pre- cipitated the move. Research from Lambda Legal and others show that members of the LGBTQcom- munity report mistreatment and misunderstanding from law enforcement, Levasseur said. "I would encourage, on the national scale, for police departments not to wait until something bad happens or when there's a lawsuit or when somebody dies in the hands of the police," Levasseur said. "Do it now" He urged St. Paul police to monitor and track compliance with the new policy. "There needs to be some accountability," Levasseur said. The public meeting is scheduled for 6-7:30 p.m., Tuesday, July 31, at the Rich- ard Rowan Training Center, 600 Lafayette Road N. Chao %long • 612-270-4708 twitter. @ChaoStrib County official vows to pay overdue tax bills . NONPROFIT from Bl up to 45 houses at one point. We thought it was too big, so we're shrinking our portfolio. I've talked to the banks and the county, and our commitment is to get caught up by the end of July, in the next week or so." He said that the nonprofit is "perfectly fine" financially. "It's a short-term issue," he said. "We have about four properties left to downsize. Once that happens we're back to where we need to be:, Some taxes have been over- due for years. Journey Home is behind on taxes for a vacant Sherburne Avenue duplex in St. Paul that were due in 2016, 2017 and the fust half of 2018. Minnesotalaw allows own- ers three years to pay delin- quent taxes before the state seizes the property and has it auctioned off to pay the debt. For Journey Home, the dead- line on the Sherburne duplex —July31—isfast approaching. The property was in arrears by $9,323 as of Tuesday, and the forfeiture process has begun Huffman has a meeting scheduled for Thursday with county tax officials to sign a confession of judgment, according to the county tax office. Ifthe Sherburne duplex qualifies for a confession, the county auditor would set up a payment plan and Journey Home won't lose the property. Two other properties owned by Journey Home are also delinquent, which means that they're more than a year behind on their taxes. Race for governor Joumey Home, according to Huffman, builds homes, buys and remodels foreclosed units and receives donated proper- ties, then rents them at below market rates. The intended beneficiaries are struggling vets and families at risk Huffman, 53, served on the Shoreview City Council for 16 years before he was elected to the Ramsey County Board in 2012, representing the sub- urbs in the northern third of the county. He was reelected with no opposition in 2016. As a commissioner, Huff- man has been a strong sup- porter of economic develop- ment and an advocate for the cleanup and redevelopment of the former Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant site. His CountyBoard salaryis $92,000. The board has raised prop- erty taxes in each of the past three years. Huffman voted for a two-year spending plan that approved a 43 percent hike in the property tax levy in 2018 and calls for another 4.3 per- cent increase in 2019. Huffman has faced late pay- ment problems in the past on his income taxes. Minnesota twice filed income tax liens on him that totaled more than $30,000 — for $22,006 in 2009 and $10,141 in 2013. He paid off the debts in 2015 and 2016, respectively, and the liens were released, according to court records. Huffman announced he was running as a Republican for governor in Apri12017, tout- ing his management of Jour- ney Home Minnesota and his time on the County Board. He said at the time that Journey Home was growing statewide and announced plans to build homes in northern Minnesota During his campaign, a DFL - aligned group circulated docu- ments about the two income tax liens. Huffman said he had mistakenly paid state taxes to Iowa, where he was working for Wells Fargo at the time, when he should have paid them to Minnesota, where he maintained his home. He bowed out of the race for the GOP nomination in Sep- tember, saying he was end- ing his bid, in part, because of the nonprofit's rapid growth "Because of my work as a com- missioner and at the nonprofit, I fmdmyselfstruggling to find time to execute an effective and qualitycampaign;' he said in a statement ending the race. Journey Home does not pay Huffman or any other employ- ees, according to its tax filing. The document shows that Huffman is the only board member who spends more than an hour a week working for the organization 'Proud of what we do' Journey Home rents to fam- ilies that earn no more than 80 percent of the area median income, and it charges no more than 30 percent of their income on rent. Any properties that it rents out below market value may qualify for property tax exemptions under state law. "We could apply to become property -tax-exempt, but we made a decision that we don't want to do that," Huffman said. Among the properties on which Journey Home owes taxes is a vacant commercial lot in Burnsville more than $15,000 overdue. The par- cel, assessed at $273,500, was donated to the nonprofit and has a property tax tab of more than $7,500 a year. Huffman said they hope to sell it to raise revenue for housing projects. Huffman said he plans to get Journey Home down to around 20 homes serving about 20 families. The nonprofit expects to sell two properties "in the coming days," which will give it the cash to pay the back taxes, he said. Even as it sells off some properties, however, Journey Home was still actively buying other properties as recently as November. It is building a house now in Maplewood for a couplewithtwo children with serious illnessesthathadbeen struggling to find an affordable place to rent, Huffman said. "We're very proud of what we do;" he said. "We're not a government-fundedorgar iza- tion. We have a lot of volun- teers, and we're trying to do our role in solving affordable housing here:' Greg Stanley • 612-673-4882 WEDNESDAY, JULY 18, 2018 MINNESOTA Heikkila, Raymond W. Lunde, Ruth Marie Pellika, Richard John Weis, Mary Adele "Ray" Age 93 of age 74 Mass ofChris- (%) loin Au- Edina, passed passed away tian Burial gust 29, 1Au away peace- ---peacefully will be held In Balsam fully on surrounded at 10:00 a.m. 7/16/18. by loved ones on Saturday, Township, Memorials to -r' at his home July 21, 1018 Minnesota. Global Health on Saturday, at St. Antho. Died July 14, Ministries, ^' July 14, 2018. ny's Catholic 2018, at MethHospi. Lutheran Preceded in Church in tai.ceded Partners in death by pa- St. Cloud for tai. Preceded �'It , ' Global Minis- rents, John - Mary Adele in death by tries, Lake Nokomis Lutheran and Helen (Lehto) Pellika. Born June Weis, age 90, of St. Cloud and for. loving wife, Church Foundation, Long Lake 27, 1944, Chisholm, MN. Rick was a merly of Paynesville, who passed Genevieve. Survived by children, Lutheran Church. Visitation for the business executive, tournament away on Saturday, July 14, 2018 at loan Bagwell (Tom), Craig public Thursday 7/19 from 4.7pm at fishing director, and small business Quiet Oaks Hospice House In St. (Dolores); grandchildren, Michael Washburn-McReavy Edina Chapel, owner. Rick was a generous, caring Augusta. Reverend Thomas (Kate), Brian (Tanya), Christian 5000 West Stith Street A private person with a sense of humor that Knoblach will officiate. Burial will (Jennifer), Rosemarie (Rob); and family service will be held at a later included many tales from the take place in St. Agnes Parish great-grandchildren, Quinn, Chloe, date. Range. Survived by his second wife, Cemetery in Roscoe. Siena; 2 great -great-grandchildren; wnvw,Wyshburn-McReavy.com Norann Lafon; children Steve Family and friends may call from and many nieces and nephews. Edina Chapel 952-920-3996 MacLean, John (Amanda), Ryan 4:00 p.m. until 8:00 pm. on Friday at Lifetime member of the VFW and Pellika, grandchildren, and many the Daniel Funeral Home in St. Cloud American Legion. Served in the US other relatives and friends. Memori- and one hour prior to services on Army during WWII. Ray was an avid Malz, Dorothy M. al Service 3 pm, July 21st United Saturday at the Church. Parish pray- outtloorsman enjoying deer hunt- Of Coon Methodist Church 307 1St Ave SW nwill be held at 5:00 p.m. on ing, fishing, hunting for duck and Helpful Telephone Numbers Social Security Admin. 1-800-772-1213 Service available from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on business days. Call to provide notification of death or to inquire about sur- vivor beneflts. U.S. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs (VA) 1-800-827-1000 Call for survivor benefits, bur- ial benefits or to provide no- tificatlon of death. United Way 2-1-1 Metro: 2.1.1 or (651)291-0211 Free, confidential, multi- lingual information is offered 24 hours every day. United Way 2-1-1 Is a unique com- munity information and ref. erral service. Call if you need to know where to turn for help. pheasant. Hobbies Included wood. Rapids,MN Chisholm, MN 55719. Memorials Friday at the funeral home. working, where he created many A passed away preferred. Mary was born on May 9, 1928 in furniture items for his wife, children and grandchildren. As a father, grandfather, great -grand -father he will be dearly missed. Mass of Christian Burial at St Bartholomew Catholic Church, 630 Wayzata Blvd E. Wayzata Minnesota on Monday, July 23, 2018 at 11:00 AM. Visitation one hour before. Interment at Fort Snelling Cemetery. Johnson Jessie Mae on r ay, Ju ,� ly 13th, 2018. ' r. She is preced- ed in death . r. by her moth- er and father, Kathy and -)� Arthur Wind- er. She is survived by a son and daughter -In-law, Anthony and Ashleigh Malz, cousins, Devona Holmes & Robin Carlson & many other family & friends. She was a Pond, Christy Rae A athering of family and friends will be held at White Funeral Home, 20134 Kenwwod Tr., Lakeville, MN from 5-8 PM Wednesday, (today) July 18th, with a service to be held at All Saints Catholic Church, 19795 Holyoke Ave, Lakeville, MN on Thursday, July 19th at 11:30 AM. In. terment, All Saints Catholic Church Cemetery. In lieu flowers memorials Minneapolis to Stuart and Florence (Lutzer) Clarke. Mary is survived by her children, Dr. John R. Weis (Dr. Holly Carveth) of Salt Lake City, Utah, Dr. Ann (Thomas) Rolfs of Boston, Mass., Paul Weis of San lose, Calif., Susan Weis of Chicago, IL., Mark (Michelle) Weis of Inver Grove Heights, MN, Peter (Carol) Weis of St Cloud, MN, Dr. Julia (Daniel) Jacobson of SL Cloud, MN, Dr. Jeffrey (Anna) Weis of Saginaw, MN IN MEMORIAM It Is the custom of many per- sons to publish an In Memor am verse as a token of respect to the memory of one who has gone. Insertion of an ad In Memoriam & additional assistance In cor. rect phrasing may be arranged by telephoning 612-673-4130 9 member of Coon Rapids UMC & vol. preferred to the Alzheimer's Assoc. and grandchildren Emily and Eric (Puerner) unteered her time as a Sunday White Funeral Home Rolfs, John (Jack) Weis, Frank iN school teacher. Services at Coon Lakeville 952.469-2723 Gi ler, Isaac Weis, Joseph and Ra- T:1�tOJl'�JIiJ Born, September 3, 1913, Died, July 9 p 14, 2018. Preceded in death by her Rapids United Methodist Church www.whitefuneralhomes.com chef Weis, Augustine and Rainer la - husband, Irwin Johnson. Survived by her sister, Florence Timmerman; nephew, Stephen (Margo) Timmer- man; niece, Carol Johnson; great. nephew, Brian (Bethany) Timmer- man and their children. August and Nora. Jessie was a graduate of McPhail School of Music, an accredited Piano and Organ college. She taught hundreds of students; she was also a beloved Organist for 62 years at the Calvary Presbyterian Church along with being an active member of the Organist Guild and played for many weddings and funerals. Funeral service will be 11:00 am Friday, July 20 at Sunset Kapala-Glodek Funeral Home (2250 St. Anthony Blvd. NE, MPIs) with visitation one hour prior. Interment Sunset Cemetery. www.SunsetFuneralServices.com Kennedy, Mary A. Age 87,of Eden Prairie, i e°a passed away �^ peacefully in the arms of her family and entered the joy of Sat. July 21, Noon with visitation at 13AM. The family has requested memorials be given to Children's Ministries at Coon Rapids UMC. McCarty, Marjorie Age 88 of New Brighton, passed away 7/15/2018. She is preceded in death by husband, Harry; brothers, Karl & Russell; sisters, Harriet, Betty, Thom and Ethel. Survived by son, Patrick (Catherine); grandchil- dren, Jeremy and Amy; great- grandchildren, Cody (Ashley), James, Jonathan, Hunter, Jayden. Visitation 5-7PM Thurs. 7/19/2018 at Sunset Funeral Home, 2250 St. Anthony Blvd. NE, Minneapolis. Graveside service 11AM Fri. at Sun- set Memorial Park (Meet at front entrance). SUNSET 612-789-3596 www.sunsetfuneralservices.com Moody, Betty J. Restorff, Herbert Allred Born July 2, 1928 in Butler, SD. Entered the Kingdom of Heaven on July 15, 2018, surrounded by loving fam. .ely. Served In the Air Force ".. from 1947- 1950, in Alaska. On March 23, 1951, he married Gladys Quiring. He later married Sanjia Amundson (Nelson) on November 4, 1974. Herb worked as an auto mechanic for 27 years in St James, MN and then as a pm - setter mechanic at the Burnsville Bowl. He was a long-time member of Amazing Grace Lutheran Church. His pastimes include golfing, bowl- ing, playing cards, fishing and read- ing. Preceded in death by parents, Richard and Sigrid; infant son, Thomas; brother, Earl; sisters: Viola, Gladys and Dorothy; father- in-law, Laverne Nelson; brother-in- law, lames Nelson and nephew, Kyle Nelson. Survived by wife, Sanila; children: Nell (Jaime), Dean (Diane) Nancy (Leland) Jennie cobson and Heidi and Luke Weis. She was preceded in death by her husband, Rainer in 2003; her grand- son, Benjamin Rolfs, an infant daughter, Jeanne; sisters Corrine Whitman and Nancy Beelin ld of Minneapolis, MN and brother Charles Clarke of Parker, Colorado. Wiens, Robert R. Age 67, of White Bear Lake. Bob passed away at his home on Tues. day July 17 surrounded by his loving family. He will be dearly missed by his wife of 41 years, Carol Wiens; sons, Jeremy (Emily Schmall) Wiens and Christopher "Cricky" (Rebecca Droste) Wiens; granddaughter, Nathalia Schmall; siblings and manyother family and friends. There will be a reception to cele. brate Bob's life from 4-8PM on Fri- day, July 20th with a service at 5PM, all at MUELLER MEMORIAL, 4738 Bald Eagle Ave., White Bear Lake. There will be a private interment at the family cemetery. Mueller Lake Mortuary 651-429-4944 muellermemorial.com Wistrom Donald E. Bruce R. Swenson Mar. 20, 1938 to Mar. 18, 2014 My Dearest Bruce Today Would Be Our 48th Anniversary In This Life The Only Thing That Mattered Is I Was Loved By You You Filled My World With Sunshine You Filled My Life With Love Forever Yours 1 heaven on Ju- :r+ ly 13, 201& (Curt) and Paul (Sandy)siblings: Age 89, of Elk LeRoy (Carol), Robert, Darlene and a River (former- FVNEP-,J. HONM Mary's beauti- Goldie; mother-in-law, Pansy Nel- `r• •. ly of 5 Mpls). ful smile will be missed by all. Pre- ,. son sisters -in -la ter = -I C (1' ) Y 9 ceded in death b her loving hus-W4. s s m aw, onnie Im , Ivah and Jill (Tom); many grandchel- Passed away on July 15, band of 68 years, Vincent. They will dren and great-grandchildren; nu- 2018. Retired now be dancing in heaven forever. merous nieces, nephews and a mul- after 30 years Survived by children: Ellen (Gary) Pe[erson; Marcy (Tom) Buettner; titude of dear friends. Memorial as a Minneap- Vincent Jr. (Meg); Deb (Mike) service 11:00 a.m. Saturday, July 21, olis Police Skatter and Greg (April); 9 grand -2 J,. 2018 at Amazing Grace Lutheran Church, 7160 S. Robert Trail, Inver Officer. He is preceded in children and 12 great- grandchildren. Celebration of Life Age 80, passed away peacefully at Grove Heights, MN. Visitation one hour prior to service at church. death by his wife Margaret and brother service will be held at 11 &m. Fri- her Annandale home with her fami. Private interment, Fort Snelling �,.... Kenneth. Donald is day, July 20 at Pax Christi Catholic ly at her side on July 15, 2018. Betty National Cemetery. survived by his children, Community, 12100 Pioneer Trl., Eden was a devoted wife, mother, grand- Michelle (Harry) Stanley, Prairie. Visitation one hour prior to service. In lieu flowers, mother, and friend who was loved by She be Riley J John M. Thomas (Cheryl) an Laura d of memori- all. will remembered for Gargretland; (Michael) Gartland; 9grand- als preferred to Pax Christi Catholic her endless loving heart, kindness, Born July 19, 1952 in Minneapolis, 9 d- Community. and open arms. Survived by hus- Minnesota and died Jul 12 in Min- children; ch `V W Funeral Chapels & Cremation Services 16 Convenient Chapels For 24-hour assistance call 612-377-2203 y dren; 2 sisters-in-law; 1 brother -in. band, Bob; children, lean, Bob J14 years. M Minnesota i the age of 65 -law; nieces, nephews, other family Kirby, Richard Forrest Deb, Jackie (Pal), Vicki (Dave); 14 years Memorial service on Wednes- and friends. A Celebration of Don's t F y grandchildren and 14 great -grand- day, July 18, 2018 11:00 AM at the life will be at 11AM on Fri, July 20, t t Age %, of Oak Park Heights, former- children. Preceded in death by Cremation Society of Minnesota, 2018 at Dare's Funeral Home, 805 rr , ly of Bloomington, MN, passed away daughter, MaryJo and son, lames 4343 Nicollet Avenue, Minneapolis, Main St, Elk River with Visitation peacefully surrounded by family on Lee. Memorial Mass of Christian Minnesota 55409. Survived by son starting at LOAM. Interment Ft + • + ; July 17, 2018. A gathering of family Burial 11 AM Friday, July 20th at and daughter-in-law Clint & Kellie; Snelling on Tues, July 24 at 12:45PM. and friends will be Saturday, July Church of St. Raphael, 7301 Bass brother Thomas (Wendy); sisters In lieu of flowers, donations in 21, 2018 from 9:00-11:00 A.M. at Lake Rd, Crystal 55428. Visitation 4- Patricia (Lee) and Carol; 2 grand- Don's name may be directed to the BOUTWELL'S LANDING - STEAM- 7pm Thursday, July 19th at Wash- children; 7 nieces & nephews. Hemophilia Foundation at MORRIS NILSEN BOAT LOUNGE, 5600 Norwich Park- burn-McReavy Glen Haven as well http://"W.hfmd.orgV way, Oak Park Heights. Additional as one hour prior to mass at the Rudy, Th " �� Dare's Funeral Home 763-441-1212 services and interment will take church. y Theodore R. Ted www.uneral nere 763-441-12 place in Sturgis, MI. Complete wwwMashburn-McReavy.com Age 87 of Cedar Crest, New Mexico, 6527 Portland Ave, Richfield, 612-8693226 notice Thursday. Glen Haven Chapel 763-533-8643 passed on June S. Formerly of St. Bradshaw -651-439-5511 5125 W. Broadway, Crystal Louis Park, MN. Preceded in death w)rw.morrisnihen.com www.bradshawfuneral.com by parents, Theodore and Anna and sister Lois Soullier. Survived by wife Knutson Reverend Paul Ostertag, Frances T. of 63 years, Alice; daughters Shelley + Age 76, of St Paul, passed away Johnson, Kristen and Lisa Rudy. Henry peacefully surrounded by her frim'- Grandchildren Natalie and Wyatt Age 80, of Edina passed away ly on June 16, 2018. Memorial Mass Johnson. Ted was born in of Christian Burial 11 AM Monday, Hamtramck, Mi. He attended the July, 24th at 1 PM at MtOlivet 2018. Funeral service Tuesday July 23rd at the Church of St Paul Henry Ford Trade School for engi- July, . (1740 Bunker Lake Blvd NE, He neering. During the Korean War he Lutheran Church. More details in Lake). Visitation one hour prior to served in the Air Force Band. He re - Sunday's paper. Mass at church Monday. Interment tired from Honeywell/Alliant Tech- www.Washburn-McReavy.com Calvary Cemetery. In lieu of flowers, systems after a successful career Edina Chapel 952-920-3996 memorials preferred to the as a Plastics Engineer. In the 19706 American Heart Association. he served on the St Louis Park Plan - Koehler, D. Genevieve Roseville Memorial Chapel ning Committee and St Louis Park age % of (651)631-2727 City Council. He was a musician, a .; traveler and artist. He enjoyed pho- Brooklyn tography, jewelry making, working Park/Center, Oxborough, Richard with clay, painting and more re- Great $ +"i° a - formerly of ' Cass Lake. eDickn Gently woodworking. He had a long- s ; time love of sports cars and owned Passed away Age 74 of Andover many throughout his life. There will peacefully, passed away When painlessly, D Y mentor o be a celebration of life open house a Y• +v.. Dick was a mentor le on Saturday, July 21 at 4820 Park and quickly countless people Commons room St. Louis Park, 0 p . singing ". on July ed through his 39 years w sobriety. the party room from 2mer'00 so- 20ist Retired Survived by beloved wife of 52 Memorials to the choice. emir's Asso- cook from School District 279. years Sandra; daughters Pamela ciation or donor's choice. She was a loving mother, aunt & (Roger) Rands and Kimberly (Robert W2 f great-aunt. Survived by son, Peter; Laidly) Hancock; 4 grandchildren; 5 daughter, Anne; sister, Lorraine great grandchildren; and 3 sistershews.. SeeVer, Suzanne M. SUnSet PreRinceded in na death by nieces &husband, Memorial service 7:00 PM on Friday "SBzie" (Mrugala) 7/20/18 at Thurston Lindberg Funer- Robert; and many brothers & al Home. 2005 Branch Ave., Anoka. Beloved Wife, Mom, Daughter Sister Jesters. Visitation 6-8PM Thursday, Visitation 5:00 - 7:DO PM. Private and Friend. Passed away peacefully `song, July 19, 2016 at Evans -Nobby Funer- interment on July 16, 2018 at the age of 51 al Home, 34 Second Street N.E., Thurston -Lindberg Funeral Home Years. Survived by husband Gray; Osseo. Mass of Christian Burial Anoka763-421-0220 son, Jaryd; parents, Carol Mrugala be, 11AM Friday, July 20, 2018 at SG www.thurston-lindberg.com & Rog Mrugala (Sue); brother, Vincent de Paul Catholic Church, Michael Mrogala (Jennifer), and 9100 93rd Ave N., Brooklyn Park with many relatives & friends. Mass of shame, visitation 1 hour prior to the Mass Pedersen, Thelma Christian Burial Saturday, July 21st, at church Friday. Interment at St at 10:00 am at ST. MARY OF THE p Vincent's Cemetery. Eidsvold LAKE CATHOLIC CHURCH, 4741 Said "it i5 t Evans-Nordby 763-424-4000 was born in Eagle Avenue, White Bear Lake. Vis. www.evansnordby.com Minneapolis 'cation Friday, July 20th, from 4-8pm ` December 1, and one hour before the Mass, all at to b -(. the church. In lieu of flowers, me. "Buzz" ° "1 1915. in her Law, Gene R BUZZ senior year of morials are preferred to the family. s. e y 88 years old high school, Mueller Lake Mortuary i r e "I of Maple she joined a 651-429-4944 r ` �.¢+�"'_ Grove asses P traveling muellermemorial.com in be ' away July 12, company to E, 2018. Preced- tap dance Shumate, William M. Sr. ed in death and perform Age 89 of Eden Prairie. Full obituary by his pa- acrobatics in the chorus line for notice will appear Sunday. rents & broth- several months in Midwestern www Wappear Sunda avy.com er, Ralph Law theaters. She married and raised Edina Chapel 952-920com -EVELY Survived by her daughter in Garden Grove, -- sons, Jason California until 1966 when they and Adam and sister, Gloria Moen. returned to Minneapolis. She re- Tompkins, Raymond I. Funeral Service Friday July 20th at tired from the Minneapolis Public 78, of Maple Grove, formerly of 1pm at Nokomis Park Chapel with Library. She was a long-time resi- Robbinsdale. Visitation Sun. Service visitation 1 hour prior to service at dent of Lyngblomsten Apartments Mon. Fuel notice Sunday. chapel. Interment Acacia Park Cem- until she moved north in 2015. On Gearty-Delmore 763-537-4511 etery. June 26, Thelma died at Aftenro gearty-delmore.com www.Wmhburn-McReavy.com Home in Duluth at the age of 102. Nokomis Park Chapel 612-721-1651 She was preceded in death by dear 1838 E. Minnehaha Parkway parents Harry and Othilee Eidsvold, Warhol, Georgenne N. brothers Roy, Ivan and At, and sis- Age 71 of NE Mpls passed awayJuly- Lichtanski, Bruno 64, of Coon Rapids died on Sunday, July 15. He is survived by his wife of 36 years. Kelly, two daughters, Heather (Jason) Brown, Hilary Leon, and two grandchildren. Blake Brown and Mady Leon. A celebra- tion of Bruno's life will be held on Friday, July 20, at Eagle Brook Church, 1100 W Hwy 10, in Anoka Visitation will be held at 9:30 AM followed by services starting at 10:30 AM. ter Helen Lobeck. She is survived by daughter Lee A. Pedersen and niece Marlys Schluck. Send memorials to the Lyngblomsten Foundation's Scholarship Fund. Memorial service Lyngblomsten Chapel, July 26, 2 pm. 14, 2018. Retired from The om Depot, NE MPIs. Preceded in death by husband, Joseph. Survived by sons, Christian (Kathy), Joseph (Jill) and Nicholas; grandchildren, Taylor, N'kyla, Sarah and Joseph; sister, Georgie; cousin, Myra; nieces, nephews, other relatives and friends. Memorial Gathering Friday, July 20th, 5 - 8pm at Cremation Society of MN, 4343 Nicollet Ave. South, MPIs. Interment Tuesday, JUIY 24th, 10:35 am (Assembly #6) at Ft. Snelling National Cemetery. p, we come . Wher, ace the the fast may it without singing finished eauty. n; s,°led autyi N EATON AIL 04) STAR TRIBUNE • BS Police say bicyclist who was killed ran red light A bicyclist allegedly rana red light at a busy intersec- tion just southofdowntown Minneapolis late Monday and was killed when he was struck by a car, police said. Themanwasridingwest on Franklin Avenue in the Lowry Hill East neighbor- hood around 11:30 p.m. when he did not stop for a red light at Hennepin Avenue. The man collided with a motorcycle head- ing north on Hennepin and was thrown from his bicycle and landed in the street. He was then struck by a passing vehicle, said police spokes- man John Elder. The bicyclist was taken by ambulance to HCMC and died at the hospital, Elder said. Both the motorcyclist and the driver of the car stopped at the scene and are cooperatingwith inves- tigators. Neither speed nor impairment appear to be factors in the crash, Elder said. The name of the bicy- clist has not been released. A passenger on the motor- cycle also was taken to the hospital with noncritical injuries. TIM HARLOW 35 years for gunmanwho followed order to kill A 32 -year-old man has been sentenced to a long prisonterm forthe shooting death of a woman who was fighting with her boyfriend outside a north Minneapo- lis strip mall. Nicholas A. Jefferson, of Minneapolis, was sen- tenced last week in Henne- pin County District Court to more than 35 years in con- nection with the May 2017 killing of lesha L. Wiley, 26, also of Minneapolis. With credit for time in jail since his arrest, Jeffer- son will serve the fust 23 years in prison and the bal- ance on supervised release. Wileyandherboyfriend, Marvel Williams, 30, were fighting near W. Broadway and Lyndale Avenue when a witness heard Williams order someone in a car stoppednearbyto shoot her. Authorities said gun- fire came from the open passenger -side window. Another witness said Jef- ferson shot Wiley from the driver's seat. Williams, who testified against Jefferson, pleaded guilty to aiding an offender and was sentenced to a five- yearterm PAULWALSH Womandies in Brainerd area crash A passenger in a car that collided with a semitrailer truck on a central Min- nesota highway has died, authorities said Monday. The crash occurred late inthe mominglast Wednes- day on Hwy. 371 near the Brainerd Lakes Area Wel- come Center, the State Patrol said. Colleen M. Epeneter, 69, of Backus, Minn., was identified by the Hennepin CountyMedical Examiner's Office as the person who was killed. Epeneter was airlifted to North Memorial Medical Center in Robbinsdale and died there Saturday. Brenda Epeneter, 41, of Bemidji, and the truck driver, 41 -year-old G abriel J. Rybaski, of Pierz, survived. PAUL WALSH B6. STAR TRIBUNE **** MINNESOTA WEDNESDAY, JULY 38, 2018 TWIN CITIESTODAY THU • 7/19 FRi a 7/20 SAT m 7/21 SUN a 7/22 MON' m 7/23 TUE m 7/24 Warm sun, rain tonight Rain likely, few t -storms Lingering showers, risk of Partly sunny, drop in Warm sunshine, looks Early thunder, then clear- Some cool sun, p.m. 7a:62°•mon: 79 --Sao 82° possible thunder humidity pretty good ing, breezy showers possible 830{( 680 740 dip 640 780 { 630 810 640 830 680 800 0 610 740 580 Daytime Coonfight Precip: 5D%- Wind: SE 7.12 Precip: 9D%• Wind: 510-15 Precip: 70%•Wind: NW 8-13 Precip: 20%• Wind: NW 8-13 Precip: 20%•Wind: NE 5-10 Precip: 30%•wind: NW 15-25 Precip: 40%•,Wind: NW 15-30 -Overnight hew: Lowesttemp enure between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m.the next day NATIONAL OUTLOOK Yesterday's high low: 112 in China Lake, CA 321n West Yellowstone, MT International Frills 83/59 ..:: WEATHER 1826;iyerFali �r i. Wlth Paul Douglas \Detroit Grand Marais • vi» r 708 a".fi.cay " Lakes 0Bemdii 66/54 ' Video forecasts: startribune.com/weather It9/� 81/62 ,Ibdiaoe 11min® `ted €, 4„ Paul's blog: startribune.com/pauldouglas r1, Paul on WCCO Radio: 3-6 p.m. weekdays 0 Brainerd Duluth Y.um'w,t Rapid City cam• Gary yeusa4e y `Alexandria 0Brain �H 80/60 �� c+ a sal n . o°t •�N wy Thank Canada for this ` ost cmO °Yet SOS D.E respite from the heat Redwood �,� caT • w' ;" city r,,,,wuie Rat.is, J Falls Ca Twin 83/68 Cities Varian 90S se ]nuts �.. • ^� 80/66 0 Mankato `°""'%°t" "'b"` ;"9+"• m n """°w` ' o:. '•A man says a lot of things in slimmer he doesn't Worthington 080/65 o 04Wwms Atlanhdm Sia e pNum chy , a r ti mean in winter," wrote Patricia Briggs. These days I m 78/W Rocheste Cy 0 63 shPwas relieved when I can talk about the weather. It may be – — ARmmu ;'- one of the few things we can agree on.ao loos Hrr le Rua ( Half the year, Minnesota meteorologists (myself included) 47 mdhae\ use the term "Canadian cold front" as a pejorative — untila -. AROUND MINNESOTA dollop of fresh, clean airfrom Alberta sweeps away the heat COY TUE TODAY THU and humidity. I wonder 1f good-natured Canadians refer to AlbertLea 79/61] M/66/pc 74/621t Me �� Alexandria 8v%A 82/66/pc 73/63/t hot fronts bubbling up from the south as American au"i Bemidji 75/45/0= 81/62/Pc 72/60] forecasts andTemperatureforecasta rathehlgleforMeday; Sunshine lures the me into the low Brainerd 78/51] 81/641 7v62/t graphisprwiided by ($ACeuWeather wantlorpattema,mefor... omens at noon. mercury 11, _ graphics prpvitletl by mwNLOADTNEMP with dry weather into the evening hours. Rain arrives tonight : Detroit lakes 77/52A 79/65/pC 71162A U.S. a WORLD Cil a sunny • pc -partly cloudy • c -cloudy • sh-smwem- t -thunderstorms • r -rain • sf-snow flurries • sn-snow• I -Ice and models print out half an inch to an inch of water tomor- Dwuth 73/54/pe 80/60] 69/57/t US TUE TODAY TNT U.S. TUE TODAY THU WORLD TUE TODAY THU Fergus Falls 79/55] 80/644c 72/60] row, with a few renegade showers spilling into Friday. An Grand Marais 64/48/OC 65/54] M/56/pc Albuquerque 69/6]/pc 93/7g/pe 6/Orlando 95/79/t 90/76/d 90(76/[ Havana 90/76/pt9/74/[ 889/75/pd instability shower may sprout Saturday afternoon, but most robbing 74/45/pe 78/53/5 70/56/7 Anchorage 65/54/pc 68/52] fi8/53A 53/s - Philadelphia 93/77/[ 8]/62] 86/65] all 84/60] 83/M/pc Atlanta 90/73/pc 92/73/pc 90/73/oenix pc PhI06/84/pc 104/97/pc 107/87/pe Hog. Kong 90/798 89/80/[ 88/79/7 of the weekend looks dry, with 70s north and low 80s south. Coal Falls 75/43] 83/59] 75/60/t Austin 991 103/76/s 104/76/5 Pittsburgh 85/72/c 78/54/5 81/62] Jerusalem 8]/69] M/6BA 87/6Th Mankato 80/600 80/65/pc 75/60/t Baltimore 9IRM 8]/61/5 864/63/5 Portland, ME Sri82/59/pc 80/59] Johannesburg 55/32] 58/3M 59/36] More refreshing air of Canadian origin arrives Monday, Moorhead 79/50] a2/65,pc 76/61/r Billings 8:3/60/po 94/63] 9/60] ! Portland. OR 901 81/57/pe 79/54/pc Kabul 96/74/pc 93/66/1 96/68/ with a winning streak of 70 -degree highs much of next week Redwood Fall 79/61] 80/se/pc 7WA BUmingham 90/74/pC 91 93/72/pc Raleigh 97/72A Ni 881. Kingston 90/82/pt 891 89/80/PC This premature taste of September is a temP Rochester 79/604 78/63/pc 73/59/t Bismarck 8/55] 3/60/pc 83/59/t Rapid City. 50 82/61/t 81/63/t 87/59/RC Kuwait City ,121111/ 114/91/5 118/95] raryContac- /5 82 St Claud 79/52/s2/Pc. 71161/tBolsa 9M63A 99/63] 96/66] sacramem° 90/60/5 10./62] %/64/uc Lima 66iba/PC WA/c 67/61/00 tion. Odds favor more 90s in August and a sweaty State Fair. Worthington 81/60/5 78/64/t 79/61/tBoston 91/69/[ 81/64/pc 78/63/ St Louis 90/73/pc 88/69/pc $7/25/t Landon 77/9/5 79/58/pc 83/6g/c Browmi 951771 SARB/s 9%RM Salt lake city 93/70/pc 98/73] 981741pc Maeda 93/6M 92/65/ 92/63a HEALTH REPORT Buffalo M/72/pc 75/54/5 81/60/ San Antonio 97/76/pc 101/77/s 102/77/5 Manila 83/78/r 85/79/sh 95/79/] TWIN CITIES TEMPS .:.Average $Record III Actual !Forecast Cedar Rapids: 85/62/ . 82/62Jpc 79/e I/t sant Diego 77/71/pc 77770/t 79/70/pc Mazatlan gws/pc 91/79/pc 91/7B/pc Charleston, SC 92/74/t 89/73/t h5/ilA San Francisco 9/55/pC 76/6amc 79l60l ! Mexico City 75/55/pc 76/52/t 77/52/t ! Today's air quality: Good Charlotte %/74/. 90/70ipd 87/70/pc sun loan 06/78/pc Bi 87/79A Mogadishu 93/70] 82/75/9 82/74,pc. 120° Cheyenne 84/55/[ 90/58] 93/56] - Seattle 82/60] ]]/58/pc 77/51/pc Montreal 86/8/[ 77/57/5 81/61] PER "loo w vw Chicago BIRO/pc 19/61] 89/69fit Sioux Giv 037667pc ]9/66/[ 06/64ype Moscow e4/62/pc 77/66/ab 74/65/sh. 4R Satisfactory; air pollution poses little Cincinnati 89/72/pc 85/62] 86/67/pc Spokane %/M/pc 091 87/5]] Mumbai 8.5/79/sh 86/80]0 86p9hh WnO risk Cleveland sin2/9e 77/59] a3/fi7A Tamps 91/80/t 89/80/c wso/t Nalrobl 77/46] 73/51/pe. 71/52/pc'. 100' ...... ........... _..._ __... Dallas 104/800 IW/82] 107/83] Tucson 99/75] 96/77/pc 98/76/t Nassau 90/79/pc 81 09/78/a Uv index: Very High Denver 86/60/t 91 W/Bei Wash., DC 9onvt 87/0/5 87/67] New Delhi 96/83/t 941 92/81A Des Moines M/M/pc M/69/pc 85/69/[ Osla M/59/DC 76/58/t 81/58/pC goo a2 a3 - sr '' aro u. Detroit 81/6515. et/60/5 83/6Lpc WORM TUE TODAY THU Ottawa 82/)0/pc 16/53/5 eal55R Sb very high risk; use sunburn protection, Eau Claire 79/54/5 81/64/s 73/62/t Acapulco 9W710c 90F77/t 90/77/[ Paris 79/65/pc 84/641 M/66/pc a reduce Gmein sun Fairbanks 60/49/c 7L55h 70/55/pc Addis Ababa 67/53/t 70/54/[ 71/55/pc Prague 84/57/pc 78/59/pe 79/55lpc , Fargo 8111 83/54/pc 7151 Amsterdam 73/61/PC 75/5Wpc 77/58/pc Quebec City 77/M/t 73/51] 77/5"c 60' ------------- �a ... ... .... ..... -. FortMyers91/R/pc 91/811 91/IS/pc Athens 93/73/ 92/76/5 9147/5 - Quito 73/51/c T3/51/pc 7a/6upc. Allergy index overall: Moderate Galveston 90/BOA 91/8M 91/80/pc Auckland 57/50/pc 61/47//0 60/4T/sh - Reykjavik 55/48/5 53/48/r i]//7/pe Greed BaY 77/57] ]8/58/5 79l65/pC Baghdad 109/80/5 112/85/s 111/85/5 Rig de Janeiro 82/67/ Bi/69/11111011111110 WAR Honolulu 87R7/pc Ski W/76/pc Bangkok 05/7911 a6/Bmh BBR9n Riyadh 102/81/5 106/810 108/81/ 40° —' - '- _- ' Houston 96/77/pc 98/78/pc t80Re/pc Barbados 86/79] 86/79/ah 87/79/pc Rome ]3/70/5 87/68/5. ST/600I LDr7 AMenl Med Mw Indianapolis 88/72/pc 82/62] Sa/sl Beijing 79f73h 91/77] 93/81/pe Santiago 54/43/pc 49/30/pe 50/29/pc F So Su M Tu W Th F Sal Su M Tu W National Allergy Bureau Jackso0vile 9insyr Fel e7//4/t Belgrade 77/68/t 79/61 75/64/pc : Sam). 80 [ /68A Inman 81/67/[ Kansas City 81/73/r 86//1/t 92/71/5 Berlin 82/64/pc 79/68/t ' 79/57] Seoul 36/73/ B02A 89/73/re Yescerday High Low : Precipitation SUN AND MOON TODAY Las Cruces 92/64/ 9T770(pc l00/73Nc Bermuda 82/70] 8ARB/po M/77/pc Shanghai 9v74/pc 9VIRA. 9VM/s ye Tuesday, Jul. 17 81° 65° 24 twur5-6 p.m. sterdaytram Total daylight: l5 hours, lO rrrinYtK " Las Vegas 109/91/po 10i104/87/pC Brussels 79/61/pc 79/56/pC 82/59/pc Singapore 89/80/PC M/80/t 69/79/t Average 84° 64° Yesterday's... ye 3.71"i01997 LOSAdgeles W16W 86/70/pc 871701 Buenos Aires 57/45/c 62/54/1 60/46/r Stockholm 88/59]' M/59A7c 84/60k: Louisville 89/73/, 81 Ba/70/po Cairo 90/77A 101/76/ 98/76] Sydney 72/46] 67/46] 71/54/pc Record 1936:99' 1976:52° Month to yesterday 4.06" FirstMadison 80/62]79/62A 7VAlt Calgary W/9/pc 80/56/t 72/54/[ Tehran 104/79/5 103MI/b 105/82] This day last year 92° 68° Month record 17.90" in 1987 Jul 19 FUN Jul 27 Memphis 94/74/t 92/ivt 92/75/pc Cancun 90/791 W/76/s 90R6/pc Tel Aviv 90/77/5 80/]7/5 88/77/5 Aba)Ye/t3elOw average +1.88" ° e Miami 9V79/pc 91/79/pc 92/79A Caracas 74/66/t 72/65/7 73/66/t Tokyo 93/79/pc %/SD/pc 93/80/c YesMdarsanapsIM(•estimate) year t0 yesterday 11.11" Milwaukee 77/67/pe 76/64/5 02/68/pc Copenhagen 75/66/t 75/62/t' 75/59A Toronto 8v68/pc 77/55/pc 80/61/5 12 am `74. been 65:. Nmn 76 spin 80 YearAbtto bebwavera9e 17.10" Last New NashvilM 94/70C 90/64/p, 91/69/oc Dublin 68/54] 68/5I/p, 68/51/c Vancouver 8I/6vs 72/55/pc 69/57/pc 3 a 70 9 a 71 Spm 80 9pm- 75 qus4 Aug 11 New Orleans M/77/c 9C79/t 93/80/t Edmi 881 77/SWt 77/551 Vienna 81/M/t 80/64/pc 79/EO/pc New York 88/68/! 86/64] 82/68] Frankfurt M/57/pc 84/61/pc 86/54/pc Vientiane 84/77/1 80/77/t a3P6/ah Cooling d". days 2018 2017 Avg. new poll 'F Okla. City 93/73/pc 98/73] 104/800 Geneva a2l64n M/fig/pC 87/62/pc Warsaw 75/66/t 8166/t B2/63/pc 24 his to 6 pm. yest 8 '35 9 High 56° lam. Suns¢: 5:44 am sunset: 8:54 pm Omaha: 78/67A 83/71/t 91/70/pc Guadalajara 80/61/pc 82/60/t 82/59/pc Winnipeg 79/43] 85/63] 81/60/[ Seasonal 611 414 348 Low 54° 2 a.m. : Moonrise: 12:23 pm Moonset: 12:04 am the Galpm proposal being Development People sign up to work the planned "overly disruptive tothe envi- d for `Prince Property' exor- bitant trafficto the broader fair for a number of reasons. azea" "To accommodate approx- 4 PRINCEfrom BI the land with City Council innately 200 new homes, our have requested that none of members last month and said communitywillbeburdened the megastar's trademarks be he hopes Lennar ultimately by construction activity used inthenewdevelopment. chooses to preserve as much for many, many years," the On Tuesday night, dozens of the wetland as possible. Strausses wrote. "We would of residents packed the city's "They have a right to mon- imagine that hundreds of Planning Commission meet- etizetheir resource —as long trees will need to be removed ing to oppose the project, as it's in accordance with city from the parcels in question." which they fear will damage laws:"Laufenburger said in an Self -described environ- neighborhoodl2akes,clear-cut interview mentalists like Barry Friends, acres of forest and increase Many residents admit whobuiltacustomhousenext congestion. they've long feared that the to Prince's land 12 years ago, More than 20 neighbors site where Prince once rode are more concerned about voiced resistance to the den- hisbikewouldbe soldafterhis the development's effects on sity of the two development deathto help heirs finance the fragile ecosystems. plans and their environmen- estate. But, several neighbors He described Lake Ann talimpact. say, they also expected public as a "suburban diamond," a 'Tveryone here knows that officials to act as stewards of crystal clear body of water area is truly a pristine jewel,' the area's natural beauty. without the urbanrunoffthat said joy Gorra, who owns 126 One man chastised city many other Twin Cities lakes acres on lake Anne, just south leaders for failing to purchase have. "You put that housing of Prince's land. "Change is the property and establish it development in there and inevitable ... but let's not be as a permanent conservancy those lakes will go to hell" quick, let's do it right Fast is in Prince's honor. He then Planning Commission not our friend." asked Lennar to deed it to member JohnLietzandtwoof So far, Lennar has pro- the city. The request was met his colleagues expressed their posed two possible build- with muffled laughs. own reservations about the outs of the property. One "PrincemovedtoChanhas- preliminary building plans. option would subdivide 138 sen because of the beauty of "I thinkthe concepts really acres into 202 single-family thisplaW'saidGregStewart. lack a respect for the land - lots for luxury houses, some "It is therefore incredibly dis- scape:' he said to a hearty of which would boast shore ingenuous for the city to turn round of applause. "You will access on each adjacent lake. around and allow planning not recognize that hillside." Another proposal creates 199 to go forward to completely The City Council will vote homesites over 88 acres, leav- destroy that forest' on the proposal Aug. 13, If ing shoreline vacantproperty In a written memo to the approved, construction could in an effort to preserve clus- city, longtime homeowners begin by fall 2019. tersoftrees. Brian and Donna Strauss Lennar'slargestfloorplans expressed concerns about Liz Sawyer- 612-673-4648 range from 2,000 to 4,000 cows in the barn and every- square feet, with average lay- outs of four bedrooms, a three - Adrianna Tarver, 18, said car garage and possible fin- ished basement, among other amenities. Smaller lots would be reserved for"luxuryvillas:' aimed at empty nesters. The company also envi- sions a public trail that con- nects its new housing units with existing neighborhoods. Joe Jablonski, land direc- tor at Lennar, acknowledged that it can be difficult to see a natural resource razed for f' --- new development "The last thing we want is to cause any issues to the lakes:' he assured homeown- ers Tuesday night. AARON LAVINSKY • aaron1avrnsky@staltnbune.m7n Mayor Denny Laufen- Jon Hebeisen, who lives near the proposed development, burger had a chance to walk expressed his concerns at the meeting on Tuesday. Photos byCARLOS GONZALEZ • cgonzalez@9tartrib4me.com Job -seekers interviewed at the fairgrounds in Falcon Heights on Tuesday, seeking to work at this year's Great Minnesota Get -Together. Up to 900 positions were available. Hundreds of hopefuls turn out for the State Fair job fair Some seek camaraderie, others just want to make a little extra cash at 12 -day gig. By KATIE GALIOTO People sign up to work the she hopes to earn some katie.gzlioto@startribune com fair for a number of reasons. money before starting col - Some enjoy the camaraderie, lege at St. Catherine Univer- Grant Bradley waited for Dullinger said, while others sity in the fall. This was her his turn inthe huddle ofgreen just want to make extra cash. first time applying towork fold -up chars, a little nervous "To say you were a part of the fair, but she's been attend - for his number to be called. welcoming 2 million people ing for years. The 16 -year-old was apply- to the fair each year, that's a "I went like five times last ing for his first job, hoping pretty big deal,"she said. year,"she said. "I justhope it's to snag a spot working at this Job -seekers began lining not too hot if Pm working. " year's Great Minnesota Get- up at the Progress Center an Mary Cunningham and Together. hour before the 4 p.m. start. her granddaughter, Freya Hundreds turned out to Afterfillingoutaregistmtion Finkle, 19, were both seeking the fairgrounds Tuesday eve- form, they grabbed a number jobs. Finkle is visiting for the ning for the State Fair's third- slip and waited for an initial summer, and Cunningham annual job fair, a streamlined interview. State Fair employ- thought it could be a fun new application process for those ees then gauged what type of way for them both to enjoy seeking al2-daygigatthe end- work an individual was best the event "I'm excited for all of -the -summer festivities. suited for, sending them to the people -watching," Finkle Up to 900 positions were specific vendors for second- said. available at the job fair, said round screenings. Bradley left the fair - Danielle Dullinger, the fair's Applicants had to be at grounds with a smile on his marketing supervisor. The least age 16 and available to face.Thoughitwasn'toff3cial, fair and its vendors hoped to work six- to 12 -hour shifts for he had been told he as good as fill at least $00 of those spots the fair's entire Tun. Pay at the had a job working with rides. Tuesday, seeking a group of fair usually ranges from $9.65 "The State Fair's always employees with varied skill to $U per hour. so cheerful and exciting:' sets — workers ready to fry Those who missed the job he said. "I'm excited for it to food -on -a -stick, care for the fair can still apply for posi- start:' cows in the barn and every- tions online, Dullinger said. thing in between. Adrianna Tarver, 18, said Katie Galioto•612-673-4706 CITY OF CHANHASSEN P 0 BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 06/17/2019 12:57 PM Receipt No. 00411793 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Lennar Family of Builders 16305 36th Ave N Ste 600 Plymouth MN 55446 - The Park ------------------------------------------------------- Final Plat 700.00 Total Cash Check 01238296 Change 5cA1`1MED 700.00 0.00 700.00 0.00 9<' 19-0 ( MEMORANDUM CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Community for Life- Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow TO: Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer Todd Hoffman, Parks & Recreation Director Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resource Specialist Eric Tessman, Building Official Renae Clark, Water Resources Coordinator FROM: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director DATE: May 28, 2019 SUBJ: The Park (Galpin Site) Final Plat Review The final plat for The Park (Galpin Site) was submitted on Friday, May 24, 2019 and is scheduled for City Council review and approval on July 8, 2019. Please review the conditions in the preliminary plat letter of approval against the plans and confirm one of the following for each: • Condition has been met • Condition has been modified • Condition still applies • Addition of new conditions based on review of final plat documents Also, please provide an updated analysis of the plan. Please respond to me with your comments and updates no later than Friday, June 28, 2019. Project documents can be found at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2019-01. Please remember that July 41h is the week prior to the meeting and is a short workweek. SCANNED PH 952.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.2211110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD - PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 March 13, 2019 Mr. Joe Jablonski U. S. Home Corporation, DBA Lennar 16305 36th Street NE, Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55443 And, Mr. Gerard Snover, V.P Comerica Bank & Trust 3551 Hamlin Road Auburn Hills, MI 48326 Re: Planning Case #2019-01, Galpin Development Dear Sirs: This letter is to confirm that on March 11, 2019, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: • The Rezoning of 191 acres from Rural Residential District, RR, to Planned Unit Development - Residential, PUD -R; including the PUD ordinance'Galpin Design Standards; The Wetland Alteration Permit of 1.28 acres of wetland impacts subject to conditions in the staff report; and • The Subdivision Preliminary Plat creating 169 lots, three outlots and dedication of public right-of-way as shown in plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated February 28, 2019, to be modified to match the site plan presented on March 11, 2019, with the reduction of four lots, subject to the following conditions: Parks & Recreation 1. Dedication of 100+/- acres of wooded open spaces and wetlands in the eastern half of the property to the City of Chanhassen for parkland in exchange for a housing density transfer and fulfillment of a nine +/- acre parkland dedication requirement. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 2 of 14 2. Acknowledgement that the dedicated land may be developed at the city's discretion as parkland for public use and may include, but is not limited to trails, boardwalks, bridges, structures, and signage. 3. The planning, engineering, grading, and placement of aggregate and bituminous base for construction of a 10 -foot wide bituminous east/west trail connection between Galpin Boulevard and a location east of Street "D", and a 10 -foot wide bituminous trail adjacent to Galpin Boulevard between Street "E" and Street "A". 4. All trails shall meet all city standards for trail construction. 5. The east/west trail shall maintain a minimum 10 -foot setback from outside edges of trail to private property and be designed to minimize encroachment of wetland buffers. 6. The east/west trail crossing of Street "A" shall be relocated from a midblock crossing as shown to the intersection of Street "A" and Street "D". 7. The east/west trail be designed and constructed so as not to require retaining walls. 8. The entirety of the east/west trail and associated buffers shall be constructed within the dedicated public outlots. 9. The planning, engineering and construction of 10 -foot wide bituminous trails connecting both Street "Z" and Topaz Drive/Ridge Lane to the planned trail at the western edge of Lake Lucy including trail easements. 10. A parking lot shall be constructed for access to the park with a minimum of eight stalls. Planning 1. All 191 acres must be included in the PUD. 2. All lots and homes must be developed consistent with the standards in the Compliance Table. Engineering 1. Any requirements set by the MCES to work within the MCES's sewer and utility easement shall be addressed by the applicant. 2. An executed agreement between the developer and the MCES allowing work within the MCES's easement shall be provided to the city prior to the issuance of grading permits. 3. The width of the public right-of-ways shall be called out on the final plat prior to acceptance and recording, this includes radii cul-de-sac bulbs. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 3 of 14 4. Thirty-foot (30 -foot) wide drainage and utility easements, for the purpose of accessing utilities and basins, shall be provided between but not limited to Lots 120 and 121 abutting Street "Z" prior to acceptance and recording. 5. Right-of-way dedication in conformance with the Carver County Development/Access Review Comments, subject to review and approval by the county and city prior to acceptance and recording of the final plat. 6. Ongoing coordination with the county and city regarding future improvements to Galpin Boulevard. Also see Condition 25. 7. The developer shall locate on the existing condition survey all existing wells and septic fields. 8. The developer shall abandon all existing wells and septic fields in accordance with all federal, state, and local regulatory agency standards, and obtain all necessary permits for said abandonments. Prior to commencement of abandonment activities, a copy of all required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the city. 9. Provide an updated existing condition survey that illustrates the MCES sanitary and utility easements on parcels 250100400 and 257580040. 10. The applicant shall submit a mass grading plan or a phased grading plan (as applicable) for review and approval by the city prior to issuance of grading permits. 11. Proposed spot elevations shall be shown on the grading plans at the center of the proposed driveway at the curb line for review prior to issuance of grading permits. 12. Proposed spot elevations shall be shown on the grading plans at top of curb for review prior to issuance of grading permits. 13. Drainage arrows for all EOF routes shall be included on the grading plans prior to issuance of grading permits. 14. Grading within bluff setbacks is subject to review and approval by the city prior to issuance of grading permits. 15. All existing buildings and structures within the city's Well House #3 property abutting Galpin Boulevard shall be included on the grading plans. 16. Grading plans shall be updated to include the location and grade of the improved and relocated access driveway to Well House #3 off Galpin Boulevard. 17. Grading plans shall be updated to include the location and protection methodology of the significant oak tree on the Well House #3 site. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 4 of 14 18. The applicant shall submit revised grading plans and stormwater plans so that no stormwater runoff flows directly onto the public trail south of Lots 164-174 abutting Street "A". 19. An updated geotechnical report assessing slope stability immediately east of Lot 110 abutting Street "A" shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading pemuts. 20. Final grading plans, including pond locations, sizing and analysis, along with right-of-way dedications off Galpin Boulevard, shall conform to the future Galpin Boulevard reconstruction project. Cross reference of grading plans, profiles, and respective cross sections are to be provided at key locations such as intersections, ponds, or other special features required by the county and city for review prior to acceptance and recording of the final plat. 21. All retaining walls exceeding four (4) feet in height shall have plans and details prepared by a registered engineer or landscape architect prior to issuance of building permits. 22. The retaining wall south of Lots 108-111 abutting Street "A" shall be adjusted to accommodate a 1.5:1 buffer from the bottom of the proposed stormwater line to the bottom of the proposed retaining wall foundation. 23. Grading and construction within bluff setbacks are subject to review and approval by the city prior to issuance of grading permits. 24. All newly constructed streets and the extension of any existing streets shall be public streets, owned and maintained by the city, after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 25. All newly constructed public streets shall be designed to meet the current standard specifications and detail plate for residential streets (Detail Plate #5200), unless otherwise directed by the City Engineer. 26. Any and all conditions associated with the alignment and configuration of Street "Z" set by the Planning Commission or City Council shall be addressed by the applicant prior to acceptance and recording of the final plat. 27. The Developer shall provide a curb cut and access easement for parcel 250100400 onto Street "Z". 28. A water service lateral shall be stubbed off Street "Z's" water main for the future connection to parcel 250100400. 29. An updated geotechnical report with additional soil borings shall be provided for review and approval prior to the commencement of construction. W Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 5 of 14 30. Sidewalks shall be extended along the cul-de-sacs located off Streets "D", "G", and "Z" and shall be constructed in accordance with the city's standard specifications and detail plates for concrete sidewalks. 31. All curb ramps shall be constructed to meet ADA standards and the city's Detail Plates #5215-5215D. 32. Intersection improvements to provide pedestrian access at the intersection of Galpin Boulevard and Street "E" shall be constructed in accordance with MUTCD best management practices. 33. A detail of the proposed street lights shall be provided prior to the issuance of building permits. 34. An enumerated list of all street lights and their proposed locations shall be provided for review and approval prior to the recording of the final plat. 35. Street lights shall be installed at all intersections and at the end of each cul-de-sac subject to review and approval of the city prior to issuance of building permits. 36. The site plan shall be updated to provide proposed street grades (centerline gradients). 37. All newly constructed water mains shall be public water mains, owned and maintained by the city, after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 38. Water mains located on Streets "A" --"H" and Street "Z" shall be tied into the high-pressure zone located on Galpm Boulevard. Water main extensions on Topaz Drive and Lucy Ridge Lane shall be tied into the existing water main stubs (low-pressure zone). 39. The water main located on Street "Z" shall be tied into the existing stub off Ruby Lane and a gate valve near the connection point shall be installed. The gate valve shall be closed to separate the pressure zones. 40. The developer shall field -verify the location of all water main taps prior to the issuance of building permits and update the plans accordingly. 41. The developer's contractor shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with Engineering and Public Works Utilities prior to the commencement of any work to the water main installation and tapping. 42. Updated plans indicating the location of all underground utilities on the east side of Galpin Boulevard, along with plans and profiles of any utility crossings on the east side of Galpin Boulevard, shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 6 of 14 43. An agreement that lists the conditions and required improvements for the land swap between the developer and the city regarding Lot 163 and a portion of the Well House #3 site, shall be executed and recorded prior to the acceptance and recording of the final plat. 44. All utility crossings of potable water and sanitary and/or storm mains will require 18 inches of vertical separation and 10 feet of horizontal separation. The developer shall submit construction plans with profiles and plan views of the utilities for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 45. All utility crossings of potable water and sanitary sewer will require that the sanitary sewer main at that crossing be constructed of PVC C900 water main material. The developer shall submit construction plans indicating material type at these locations for review and approval of the city prior to issuance of building permits. 46. The developer shall submit construction plans indicating that pipe lengths of sanitary sewer mains are centered over potable water crossings. 47. Water mains shall be constructed at 7.5 feet below grade, or insulated, and constructed in conformance with the city's standard specifications and detail plates. 48. Cluster valves located around water main tees shall be installed at a minimum of 5 feet from the tees to the valves, where feasible. All valve locations and any other water main appurtenances shall be reviewed and approved by Engineering and Public Works prior to the issuance of building permits. 49. All comments and conditions regarding fire appurtenances, spacing, and location set forth by the Fire Department shall be addressed by the applicant. 50. All newly constructed sewer mains shall be public sewer mains, owned and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 51. A 30 -foot utility easement shall be recorded over the existing public sewer line, within Outlot A located near the south-central area of the preliminary plat, prior to acceptance of final plat. 52. All conditions set forth by the MCES for the direct connection and installation of an access manhole to their think line shall be addressed by the applicant, and all permits required for the connection and installation of the manhole shall be obtained prior to the commencement of construction. 53. The applicant shall ensure the city's sanitary sewer nomenclature is incorporated in the construction plans. 54. Profile sheets for all public utilities, including sanitary sewer, shall be required for review and approval by the city prior to issuance of building permits. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 7 of 14 55. PVC sanitary sewer pipes that will be constructed at a burial depth of 0-16 feet shall be constructed of pipe class SDR 35, burial depths of 16-26 feet shall be of pipe class SDR 26, and burial depths of greater than 26 feet shall be of pipe class C900. 56. Inverts that have a 20 -inch or greater differential shall be supplied inside drops per city standards and be constructed per the city's Detail Plate No. 2104. 57. No roadway connection shall be made to Topaz Drive. Stormwater Conditions & Wetlands The 2019 SWMP Fee is $432,183.23, pending any plan revisions. This fee will be applied to the new lots of record being created. It is calculated as shown in the table below: SURFACE WATER DEVELOPMENT FEE AREA PER ACRE FEE ACRES FEE GROSS AREA $8,320 191.0465 $1,589,506.88 ROW $8,320 16.79 i(139,692.80) OUTLOTS $8,320 122.3114 $(1,017,630.85) NET AREA 51.9451 $432,183.23 Assessments Water and sewer partial hookups are due at the time of final plat. The partial hookup fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time. The remaining partial hookups fees are due with the building permit. Fees Based on the proposal, the following fees would be collected with the development contract: • Administration Fee: If the improvement costs are between $500,000 and $1,000,000, 2% of the improvement costs. If the improvement costs exceed $1,000,000, 2.5% of the first $1,000,000 plus 1.5% of the remainder. • Surface Water Management Fee: $432,183.23 • A portion of the water hook-up charge: $2,311/unit • A portion of the sanitary sewer hook-up charge: $691/unit • GIS fees: $25 for the plat plus $10 per parcel • Street light operating fee for one year: $300 per light Conditions of Approval 1. Wetland permitting is required due to the proximity of and proposed impacts to wetlands on site. A wetland permit application has not yet been received by the city from the applicant. Grading permits will not be issued until approved wetland permits have been received. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 8 of 14 2. Wetland review will include ensuring hydrology is maintained to all wetlands to be preserved as well as review of proposed stormwater impacts. 3. Storm sewer sizing calculations should be provided to confirm storm sewer is sized to convey the 10 -year storm event. 4. An NPDES permit and accompanying Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required prior to the start of construction. 5. An operations and maintenance plan for the proposed stormwater management system will be required prior to approval. 6. Provide infiltration test results per MPCA Requirements in the location of each proposed infiltration area. 7. All comments and conditions set forth by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District shall be addressed by the applicant. 8. Show all existing storm sewer and other water resource -related features in plans. 9. Adjust and show all easements over the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' sanitary sewer on the preliminary and final plat. 10. Clearly indicate what storm sewer will be private and what will be public. All public storm sewer will be required to be shown in profile view. Applicant should confirm there are no conflicts with the water main or sanitary sewer throughout the site. 11. The following comments pertain to all proposed ponds that include an infiltration bench (Basins 100, 200 and 300): a. Infiltration test results will be required in the location of all proposed infiltration benches and infiltration basins. Infiltration test results have not been submitted in the location of proposed Basin 100. If filtration is to be used, the applicant will need to provide a specification for amended soils. b. The exfiltration above the piped outlet elevation should be included in the HydroCAD model and the exfiltration rate should correspond to what is presented in the infiltration test results. c. The proposed infiltration benches will be required to meet the 48-hour drawdown requirement. d. Outlets from the pond should be moved out of the permanent pond area and should be moved away from the inlet to minimize the risk of short circuiting. 12. The proposed piped outlet being modeled for Basin 400 is not shown in the plans. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 9 of 14 13. Access routes for all proposed stormwater basins are required for maintenance purposes. Applicant should callout access locations for all proposed stormwater basins. 14. A defined riprap EOF spillway will be required for all stormwater basins per details provided on Sheet 33. Applicant should include location and elevation of all EOF spillways on the storm sewer plans. 15. The soil borings provided show that there are clay soils throughout the site. Modeling should be updated to reflect the D soils present. 16. Proposed and existing HydroCAD models should be modeling the same area. There is roughly 120 acres included in the existing conditions model that is not included in the proposed conditions model. All offsite drainage should be included in the models. 17. Existing and proposed conditions drainage area maps should be updated to show the location and boundaries of all subeatchments included in the models. 18. Time of concentrations should be calculated in HydroCAD and not directly entered to confirm accuracy. Provide supporting calculations for all directly entered times of concentrations. 19. From the drainage area maps, it appears that P -LU 2-6 (P.E. Edit) in the existing model corresponds to Pond 500P in the proposed conditions model. The modeled storage for the wetland differs between the existing and proposed conditions models but no wetland impacts are shown on Sheet 37 for this wetland. Applicant should update the models so that they have the same storage modeled for the wetland. a. There is a proposed piped outlet from this wetland that is over four feet lower than the current natural spillway outlet. The applicant will be required to show that this does not change the hydrology of the existing wetland as part of the wetland permit requirements. 20. There are numerous inconsistencies between what is shown in the plans on Sheet 35 for the outlets of the stormwater basins and what is being modeled in HydroCAD and P8. Applicant will need to update the models so that they are representative of what is being shown in the plans. 21. The same total area should be modeled in P8 as in HydroCAD. 22. The model should be run for at least 50 years and should include the most recent precipitation data included in the precipitation file to get accurate removal efficiencies. 23. The modeling of the proposed stormwater ponds with filtration benches is incorrect and is overestimating the removal efficiencies of the basins. The applicant should update the model for the stormwater basins in the following way: Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 10 of 14 a. The design infiltration rate should be added to the flood pool section of the stormwater pond devices where applicable. This will model infiltration above the outlet elevation. The design infiltration rate should match what is being modeled in HydroCAD. b. The infiltration basins should be removed from the model (except for Device 600i). c. Applicant should confirm total phosphorus and total suspended solids removal requirements are still being met after the model has been updated. 24. Watersheds 201 and 600 are only modeling the impervious area. The pervious area in these watersheds should be added to the model. 25. Watershed 300 in the P8 model has 25% impervious while the corresponding HydroCAD subwatershed has 45% impervious modeled. Applicant should update the models to be consistent with one another and representative of the plans. 26. The total areas listed in the table in Section IIIA of the Stormwater Management Plan are inconsistent with the total area called out in the plans and the total area being modeled. Applicant should include the entire site in the areas shown in the table. 27. Any projects seeking a wetland alteration permit subject to this article will also be required to submit the following: Existing and proposed drainage areas to wetlands; Buffer strip plan meeting the criteria of subsections 20-411(c) and (d). 28. Sec. 20-416. Mitigation. Wetland mitigation shall be undertaken on site. If this is not feasible, then mitigation may occur locally within the subwatershed. If this is not possible, then mitigation may occur outside the subwatershed, elsewhere in the city. If mitigation cannot be accomplished on site, or if the city deems it necessary to perform mitigation off site, then the applicant shall be responsible for providing off-site mitigation within the major subwatershed, as designated by the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, or purchasing wetland credits from the state wetland bank. 29. Stormwater runoff shall not be discharged into wetlands without water quality pretreatment as prescribed by City Code. 30. If a Wetland Alteration Permit is issued allowing wetland alteration, the following standards shall be followed: (1) The alteration will not have a net adverse effect on the ecological and hydrological characteristics of remaining wetland, (2) It shall be located as to minimize the impact on vegetation, (3) It shall not adversely change water flow, (4) The size of the altered area shall be limited to the minimum required for the proposed action, (5) The disposal of any excess material is prohibited within remaining wetland areas, (6) The disposal of any excess material shall include proper erosion control and nutrient retention measures, (7) Alterations to any wetland area are prohibited during waterfowl breeding season or fish spawning season, unless it is determined by the city that the wetland is not used for Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page I 1 of 14 waterfowl breeding or fish spawning, and (8) Alterations to wetland areas shall be mitigated in accordance with the requirements of this article if the activity results in a loss of wetland area and/or function and value of the wetland. 31. The alteration shall not alter the hydrological patterns in the remainder of the wetland, if a portion of the wetland remains, unless exempted under Sec. 20-417. Show how hydrologic patterns will not be altered for the remaining wetlands. 32. Sec. 20-405. Wetland delineation. An electronic copy of the delineated wetland boundaries must be submitted in a format compatible with the city's GIS database. 33. Sec. 20-406. Wetland classification. All wetlands delineated under Sec. 20-405 of this article that have not been previously classified shall be classified using the results from the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method for Evaluating Wetland Functions (MnRAM Version 3.0), or future versions. A MnRAM shall be completed by the property owner or applicant for each previously unclassified wetland. An electronic version of the MnRAM evaluation must be submitted to and approved by the city to establish the classification of each wetland prior to any alteration or impact to the wetland. 34. Staff review will be conditional upon the approved Wetland Replacement Plan. 35. A grading permit cannot be issued until the applicant has completed the WCA process. 36. Wetland Buffers. Wetland buffers and buffer monumentation will be required adjacent to the wetlands on site. Please indicate wetland buffer widths and locations where signage will be placed on a plan sheet. Please find additional information on signage placement in the city's guidance document. The WMO provides signs and sign posts for the cost of materials. Alternative signs (by the city or applicant) are also acceptable provided they contain similar information. 37. Sec. 19-146. Wetland elements. a. Water level fluctuations (peak elevation and duration) for wetlands shall be limited to two feet and duration not to exceed 48 hours so as to prevent the destruction of wildlife habitat and wetland vegetation. b. Sedimentation basins or sediment removal devices shall be provided prior to discharge into wetlands. c. Variable bottom contours should be considered to provide deeper holes and flat shallow benches. This feature will provide habitat for diversity of plants and wetland inhabitants for wetland mitigation sites and stormwater basins. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 12 of 14 Landscaping and Tree Preservation 1. The developer shall conduct a walk-through of the grading limits on site prior to removals with city staff to inspect for opportunities for additional tree preservation. 2. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around existing trees to be saved prior to any construction activities and remain installed until completion. 3. All trees shall be planted outside of the street right-of-way. 4. The applicant shall increase tree planting in the development to meet minimum requirements of 590 trees. 5. Buffer plantings shall be added to the east of the city well building. 6. The three oaks on city property (not inventoried) to the south of the city well building shall remain and the grading limits be adjusted to provide for preservation by avoiding any grading within the critical root zone areas of the trees. 7. Autumn Blaze maples shall be eliminated from the plant schedule. 8. Northern Pin Oak shall be replaced with white, bur, red or bicolor oak species in the plant schedule. 9. Additional selections of tree species shall expand the breadth of tree types and take into consideration soil conditions and future hardiness zone changes. 10. No tree Genus shall comprise of more than 20% of the total number of trees and no tree species shall comprise of more than 10% of the total number of trees. 11. The applicant shall revise the plans to show the bluff impact zone on both bluffs and eliminate grading within these areas. 12. Private lot boundaries shall not encroach into bluff areas. 13. Lots with significant tree cover contain conservation easements to protect the wooded areas. Lots 501, 504, 505, 530 and 531 should have protective easements over parts of the lot containing existing forest. Specifically, the rear 40 feet of Lot 501, the rear 100 feet of Lots 504 and 505, the westerly 200 feet of Lot 530, and the easterly 250-300 feet of Lot 531. L- Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 13 of 14 As soon as possible, provide a revised preliminary plat showing 169 lots with the engineering plans in conformance with the lot configuration. In addition, provide a revised landscaping plan, tree preservation, and lot compliance table as represented in your March 11, 2019 City Council presentation. Final plat documents and application must be submitted to the city 35 days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Conditions of the preliminary plat approval must be addressed for final plat approval. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat approval. A unique plat name must be included with the final plat submittal. The rezoning of the residential lots shall not be official until approval of the final plat and execution of the project development contract. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (952) 227-1139 or by email at kaanenson(a.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincer ly, Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Enclosure ec: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer Todd Hoffman, Parks & Recreation Director Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resource Specialist Eric Tessman, Building Official Paul Cheme, Pioneer Engineering 9:\0e112019 planningcases•19-01 galpin site preliminary plat mW rezoning pudcity council 3-I1-19approwl lelter.docx ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: 1. Submit three (3) sets of full size, 50 scale construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Improvements: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. C. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading h. Street lights & signs i. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping 7. Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (8'/s" x 11"), and a digital copy in .tif format. 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc format. 9. Lot tabulations. Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration offinal plat before the City Council. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Date: ,'JQ(J I PC Date: CC Date:' -7/9119 60 -Day Review Date: (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accorrpany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment..._ ................. $600 ❑ Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers..... $100 ❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots.......................$600 + $15 per lot ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (_lots) ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots).................................. $300 ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 ❑ Consolidate Lots .............................................. $150 ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) [J Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑ Final Plat $700 ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 .......................................................... (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)' F1 All Others......................................................... $425 •Additional escrow may be required for other applications ❑ Rezoning (REZ) through the development contract. ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ All Others ......................................................... $500 ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Sign Plan Review...................................................$150 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ Administrative ..................................................$100 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts'......................$500 ❑ Zoning Appeal $100 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: ...................................................... thousand square feet) 'Include E] Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 number of xis in employees: *Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts . $50o NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, .............. "" its) """ Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_units) the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ❑ Notification Sign (City to install and remove)...................................................................................................................... $200 ❑ Property Owners' List within 500' (city to generate after pre -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)...................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements (_ easements) ❑ Deeds TOTAL FEE: $700.00 Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Final plat application for The Park Property Address or Location. Parcel #: Total Acreage: 7141 Galoin Road Legal Description: Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes ❑ No Present Zoning. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Present Land Use Designation: Select One Existing Use of Property: Vacant ❑Check box if separate narrative is attached. Requested Zoning: Not Applicable Requested Land Use Designation: Not Applicable Section 3: Property APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: U.S Home Corporation D/B/A Lennar Contact: Joe Jablonski Address. 16305 36th Ave Ne, Suite 600 Phone (952) 249-3014 City/State/Zip: Plymouth, MN 55446 Cell (612) 490-6076 Email: joe.jabgnski@lennar.com Fax: ga°"0ejai IX11° 5/22/19 Joe Jablonski Up,' y9ne Signature. 0" 2019,MU OM -c5'00. Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Same as above Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Joe Jablonski °'"'19"ed1,Joe Jabne` Signature: Oeli12e 220311 9.05 0046.19-05'OP Date: This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Pioneer Engineering Contact: Paul Cherne Address, 2422 Enterprise Drive Phone: (651) 251-0630 City/State/Zip: Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Cell, Email: pcherne@pioneereng.com Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: Property Owner Via. Z Email Mailed Paper Copy Name. ❑ Applicant Via: []Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑� Engineer Via: ❑r Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. SAVE FORM 1 PRINT FORM SUBMIT FORM Thomas J. Campbell* Roger N. Knutson Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehler Soren M. Mattick Henry A. Schaeffer, IB Alma Schwartz Shama N. Conklin Amy B. Schutt James J. Monge, BI Jerome M. Porter David S. Kendall Kurt S. Fischer *OfCo..t Grand Oak Office Center 1 860 Blue Gentian Road Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 551?I Main: 651-452-5000 Fax: 651-234-6237 w-ww.ck-law.com CAMPBELL KNUTSON May 6, 2019 Ms. Jean Steckling City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Miscellaneous Recordings Dear Ms. Steckling: Please find enclosed, for the City's files, the following documents which have been recorded with Carver County: Encroachment Agreement with Ryan and Kristina Truax, recorded May 3, 2019 as document number A676539; and 2. Wetland Alteration Permit 019-01 for Galpin Development, recorded May 6, 2019 as document number T209579. Thank you. Very truly yours, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Je lson, Lega Assistant /jmo Enclosures 200786v2 Document #: T209579 Date: 05-06-2019 Time: 11:18 AM Pages: 5 Cert # 5 CERTS.0 Filing Fee: $126.00 Paid on 05-06-2019 County: Carver State: MN Requesting Party: The City of Chanhassen Kaaren Lewis Registrar of Titles CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT #2019-01 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a wetland alteration permit for the following use: Galpin Development 2. Pro . The permit is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as follows: See Exhibit A 3. Conditions. The Wetland Alteration Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: a. Any projects seeking a wetland alteration permit subject to this article will also be required to submit the following: Existing and proposed drainage areas to wetlands; Buffer strip plan meeting the criteria of subsections 20-411(c) and (d). b. Sec. 20-416. Mitigation. Wetland mitigation shall be undertaken on site. If this is not feasible, then mitigation may occur locally within the subwatershed. If this is not possible, then mitigation may occur outside the subwatershed, elsewhere in the city. If mitigation cannot be accomplished on site, or if the city deems it necessary to perform mitigation off site, then the applicant shall be responsible for providing off-site mitigation within the major subwatershed, as designated by the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, or purchasing wetland credits from the state wetland bank. c. Stormwater runoff shall not be discharged into wetlands without water quality pretreatment as prescribed by City Code. d. If a Wetland Alteration Permit is issued allowing wetland alteration, the following standards shall be followed: (1) The alteration will not have a net adverse effect on the ecological and hydrological characteristics of remaining wetland, (2) It shall be located as to minimize the impact on vegetation, (3) It shall not adversely change water flow, (4) The size of the altered area shall be limited to the minimum required for the proposed action, (5) The disposal of any excess material is prohibited within remaining wetland areas, (6) The disposal of any excess material shall include proper erosion control and nutrient retention measures, (7) Alterations to any wetland area are prohibited during waterfowl breeding season or fish spawning season, unless it is determined by the city that the wetland is not used for waterfowl breeding or fish spawning, and (8) Alterations to wetland areas shall be mitigated in accordance with the requirements of this article if the activity results in a loss of wetland area and/or function and value of the wetland. e. The alteration shall not alter the hydrological patterns in the remainder of the wetland, if a portion of the wetland remains, unless exempted under Sec. 20-417. Show how hydrologic patterns will not be altered for the remaining wetlands. f. Sec. 20-405. Wetland delineation. An electronic copy of the delineated wetland boundaries must be submitted in a format compatible with the city's GIS database. g. Sec. 20-406. Wetland classification. All wetlands delineated under Sec. 20-405 of this article that have not been previously classified shall be classified using the results from the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method for Evaluating Wetland Functions (MnRAM Version 3.0), or future versions. A MnRAM shall be completed by the property owner or applicant for each previously unclassified wetland. An electronic version of the MnRAM evaluation must be submitted to and approved by the city to establish the classification of each wetland prior to any alteration or impact to the wetland. h. Staff review will be conditional upon the approved Wetland Replacement Plan. i. A grading permit cannot be issued until the applicant has completed the WCA process. j. Wetland Buffers. Wetland buffers and buffer monumentation will be required adjacent to the wetlands on site. Please indicate wetland buffer widths and locations where signage will be placed on a plan sheet. Please find additional information on signage placement in the city's guidance document. The WMO provides signs and sign posts for the cost of materials. Alternative signs (by the city or applicant) are also acceptable provided they contain similar information. k. Sec. 19-146. Wetland elements. 1) Water level fluctuations (peak elevation and duration) for wetlands shall be limited to two feet and duration not to exceed 48 hours so as to prevent the destruction of wildlife habitat and wetland vegetation. 2) Sedimentation basins or sediment removal devices shall be provided prior to discharge into wetlands. 3) Variable bottom contours should be considered to provide deeper holes and flat shallow benches. This feature will provide habitat for diversity of plants and wetland inhabitants for wetland mitigation sites and stormwater basins. 2 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the pemmit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: March 11, 2019 CITY OF CHANHASSEN i By: Elise Ryan, ayor SEAL A By: � y Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_" day of t� 20AS by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 3 Ut ixil.� Notary P lic yA KIM T. MEUWISSEN k Notary Public -Minnesota My Commlaelon Explree Jen 37, 2020 Exhibit A Legal Description: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter corner of said Section 10; thence South along the North- South Quarter line of said Section 10 as distance of 409.69 feet; thence West along a line parallel with the South line of the North Half of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 435.76 feet to the centerline of the Excelsior -Shakopee Road; thence Northeasterly along said centerline a distance of 419.39 feet to the North line of side Section 10; thence East along the North line of said Section 10 to the point of beginning, all according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof. That part of the South half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 23 Carver County, Minnesota lying easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117, also known as Galpin Boulevard, and lying North of the South 186.00 feet of said South half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter thereof. Together with: That part of the westerly 183.00 feet of each of the following two tracts: (1) That part of the South 186.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5" Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117 (also known as Galpin Lake Road and formerly known as Chaska and Excelsior Road and as Excelsior and Shakopee Road). (2) That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5' Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117 (also known as Galpin Lake Road and formerly known as Chaska and Excelsior Road and as Excelsior and Shakopee Road). Which lies northerly of lines described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast comer of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 08 seconds West, along the North line of said South half of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 588.71 feet, to the beginning of the lines to be described; thence South 65 degrees 37 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 98.69 feet; thence Northwesterly a distance of 141.37 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 180.00 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, the chord of said curve is 137.77 feet in length and bears North 46 degrees 52 minutes 45 seconds West; thence North 69 degrees 22 minutes 45 seconds West, tangent to said curve a distance of 40.00 feet and said line there terminating. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT #2019-01 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a wetland alteration permit for the following use: Galpin Development 2. Pro . The permit is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as follows: See Exhibit A 3. Conditions. The Wetland Alteration Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: a. Any projects seeking a wetland alteration permit subject to this article will also be required to submit the following: Existing and proposed drainage areas to wetlands; Buffer strip plan meeting the criteria of subsections 20-411(c) and (d). b. Sec. 201116. Mitigation. Wetland mitigation shall be undertaken on site. If this is not feasible, then mitigation may occur locally within the subwatershed. If this is not possible, then mitigation may occur outside the subwatershed, elsewhere in the city. If mitigation cannot be accomplished on site, or if the city deems it necessary to perform mitigation off site, then the applicant shall be responsible for providing off-site mitigation within the major subwatershed, as designated by the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, or purchasing wetland credits from the state wetland bank. c. Stormwater runoff shall not be discharged into wetlands without water quality pretreatment as prescribed by City Code. d. If a Wetland Alteration Permit is issued allowing wetland alteration, the following standards shall be followed: (1) The alteration will not have a net adverse effect on the ecological and hydrological characteristics of remaining wetland, (2) It shall be located as to minimize the impact on vegetation, (3) It shall not adversely change water flow, (4) The size of the altered area shall be limited to the minimum required for the proposed action, (5) The disposal of any excess material is prohibited within remaining wetland areas, (6) The disposal of any excess material shall include proper erosion control and nutrient retention measures, (7) Alterations to any wetland area are prohibited during waterfowl breeding season or fish spawning season, unless it is determined by the city that the wetland is not used for waterfowl breeding or fish spawning, and (8) Alterations to wetland areas shall be mitigated in accordance with the requirements of this article if the activity results in a loss of wetland area and/or function and value of the wetland. e. The alteration shall not alter the hydrological patterns in the remainder of the wetland, if a portion of the wetland remains, unless exempted under Sec. 20-417. Show how hydrologic patterns will not be altered for the remaining wetlands. £ Sec. 20-405. Wetland delineation. An electronic copy of the delineated wetland boundaries must be submitted in a format compatible with the city's GIS database. g. Sec. 20-406. Wetland classification. All wetlands delineated under Sec. 20-405 of this article that have not been previously classified shall be classified using the results from the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method for Evaluating Wetland Functions (MnRAM Version 3.0), or future versions. A MnRAM shall be completed by the property owner or applicant for each previously unclassified wetland. An electronic version of the MnRAM evaluation must be submitted to and approved by the city to establish the classification of each wetland prior to any alteration or impact to the wetland. h. Staff review will be conditional upon the approved Wetland Replacement Plan. i. A grading permit cannot be issued until the applicant has completed the WCA process. Wetland Buffers. Wetland buffers and buffer monumentation will be required adjacent to the wetlands on site. Please indicate wetland buffer widths and locations where signage will be placed on a plan sheet. Please find additional information on signage placement in the city's guidance document. The WMO provides signs and sign posts for the cost of materials. Alternative signs (by the city or applicant) are also acceptable provided they contain similar information. k. Sec. 19-146. Wetland elements. 1) Water level fluctuations (peak elevation and duration) for wetlands shall be limited to two feet and duration not to exceed 48 hours so as to prevent the destruction of wildlife habitat and wetland vegetation. 2) Sedimentation basins or sediment removal devices shall be provided prior to discharge into wetlands. 3) Variable bottom contours should be considered to provide deeper holes and flat shallow benches. This feature will provide habitat for diversity of plants and wetland inhabitants for wetland mitigation sites and stormwater basins. 2 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penaltv. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: March 11, 2019 SEAL :> •I ll•bgIUN•Nl•• '`•` STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF CARVER ) ( ss CTI'Y OF CHANHASSEN Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisa&y of i 20 t5 by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 (IXw� No P lic I. KIM TISSEN Notary Public -Minnesota MEUW:` My Conxnws on E)pm Jan 31, 2020 Exhibit A Legal Description: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter comer of said Section 10; thence South along the North- South Quarter line of said Section 10 as distance of 409.69 feet; thence West along a line parallel with the South line of the North Half of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 435.76 feet to the centerline of the Excelsior -Shakopee Road; thence Northeasterly along said centerline a distance of 419.39 feet to the North line of side Section 10; thence East along the North line of said Section 10 to the point of beginning, all according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof. That part of the South half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 23 Carver County, Minnesota lying easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117, also known as Galpin Boulevard, and lying North of the South 186.00 feet of said South half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter thereof. Together with: That part of the westerly 183.00 feet of each of the following two tracts: (1) That part of the South 186.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5' Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117 (also known as Galpin Lake Road and formerly known as Chaska and Excelsior Road and as Excelsior and Shakopee Road). (2) That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5' Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117 (also known as Galpin Lake Road and formerly known as Chaska and Excelsior Road and as Excelsior and Shakopee Road). Which lies northerly of lines described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast comer of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 08 seconds West, along the North line of said South half of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 588.71 feet, to the beginning of the lines to be 4 . .. described; thence South 65 degrees 37 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 98.69 feet; thence Northwesterly a distance of 141.37 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 180.00 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, the chord of said curve is 137.77 feet in length and bears North 46 degrees 52 minutes 45 seconds West; thence North 69 degrees 22 minutes 45 seconds West, tangent to said curve a distance of 40.00 feet and said line there terminating. March 13. 2019 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Mr. Joe Jablonski U. S. Home Corporation, DBA Lennar 16305 36d' Street NE, Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55443 And, Mr. Gerard Snover, V.P. Comerica Bank & Trust 3551 Hamlin Road Auburn Hills, MI 48326 Re: Planning Case #2019-01, Galpin Development Dear Sus: This letter is to confirm that on March 11, 2019, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: • The Rezoning of 191 acres from Rural Residential District, RR, to Planned Unit Development - Residential, PUD -R; including the PUD ordinance 'Galpin Design Standards; The Wetland Alteration Permit of 1.28 acres of wetland impacts subject to conditions in the staff report; and • The Subdivision Preliminary Plat creating 169 lots, three outlots and dedication of public right-of-way as shown in pians prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated February 28, 2019, to be modified to match the site plan presented on March 11, 2019, with the reduction of four lots, subject to the following conditions: Parks & Recreation I. Dedication of 100+/- acres of wooded open spaces and wetlands in the eastern half of the property to the City of Chanhassen for parkland in exchange for a housing density transfer and fulfillment of a nine +/- acre parkland dedication requirement. PH 952.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD - PO BOX 147 - CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 SCANNED Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 2 of 14 2. Acknowledgement that the dedicated land may be developed at the city's discretion as parkland for public use and may include, but is not limited to trails, boardwalks, bridges, structures, and signage. 3. The planning, engineering, grading, and placement of aggregate and bituminous base for construction of a 10 -foot wide bituminous east/west trail connection between Galpin Boulevard and a location east of Street "D", and a 10 -foot wide bituminous trail adjacent to Galpin Boulevard between Street "E" and Street "A". 4. All trails shall meet all city standards for trail construction. 5. The east/west trail shall maintain a minimum l0 -foot setback from outside edges of trail to private property and be designed to minimize encroachment of wetland buffers. 6. The east/west trail crossing of Street "A" shall be relocated from a midblock crossing as shown to the intersection of Street "A" and Street "D". 7. The cast/west trail be designed and constructed so as not to require retaining walls. 8. The entirety of the east/west trail and associated buffers shall be constructed within the dedicated public outlots. 9. The planning, engineering and construction of 10 -foot wide bituminous trails connecting both Street "Z" and Topaz Drive/Ridge Lane to the planned trail at the western edge of Lake Lucy including trail easements. 10. A parking lot shall be constructed for access to the park with a minimum of eight stalls. Planning 1. All 191 acres must be included in the PUD. 2. All lots and homes must be developed consistent with the standards in the Compliance Table. Engineering 1. Any requirements set by the MCES to work within the MCES's sewer and utility easement shall be addressed by the applicant. 2. An executed agreement between the developer and the MCES allowing work within the MCES's easement shall be provided to the city prior to the issuance of grading permits. 3. The width of the public right-of-ways shall be called out on the final plat prior to acceptance and recording, this includes radii cul-de-sac bulbs. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 3 of 14 4. Thirty-foot (30 -foot) wide drainage and utility easements, for the purpose of accessing utilities and basins, shall be provided between but not limited to Lots 120 and 121 abutting Street "T' prior to acceptance and recording. 5. Right-of-way dedication in conformance with the Carver County Development/Access Review Comments, subject to review and approval by the county and city prior to acceptance and recording of the final plat. 6. Ongoing coordination with the county and city regarding future improvements to Galpin Boulevard. Also see Condition 25. 7. The developer shall locate on the existing condition survey all existing wells and septic fields. 8. The developer shall abandon all existing wells and septic fields in accordance with all federal, state, and local regulatory agency standards, and obtain all necessary permits for said abandonments. Prior to commencement of abandonment activities, a copy of all required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the city. 9. Provide an updated existing condition survey that illustrates the MCES sanitary and utility easements on parcels 250100400 and 257580040. 10. The applicant shall submit a mass grading plan or a phased grading plan (as applicable) for review and approval by the city prior to issuance of grading permits. 11. Proposed spot elevations shall be shown on the grading plans at the center of the proposed driveway at the curb line for review prior to issuance of grading permits. 12. Proposed spot elevations shall be shown on the grading plans at top of curb for review prior to issuance of grading permits. 13. Drainage arrows for all EOF routes shall be included on the grading plans prior to issuance of grading permits. 14. Grading within bluff setbacks is subject to review and approval by the city prior to issuance of grading permits. 15. All existing buildings and structures within the city's Well House #3 property abutting Galpin Boulevard shall be included on the grading plans. 16. Grading plans shall be updated to include the location and grade of the improved and relocated access driveway to Well House #3 off Galpin Boulevard. 17. Grading plans shall be updated to include the location and protection methodology of the significant oak tree on the Well House #3 site. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 4 of 14 18. The applicant shall submit revised grading plans and stormwater plans so that no stormwater runoff flows directly onto the public trail south of Lots 164-174 abutting Street "A". 19. An updated geotechnical report assessing slope stability immediately east of Lot 110 abutting Street "A" shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 20. Final grading plans, including pond locations, sizing and analysis, along with right-of-way dedications off Galpin Boulevard, shall conform to the future Galpin Boulevard reconstruction project. Cross reference of grading plans, profiles, and respective cross sections are to be provided at key locations such as intersections, ponds, or other special features required by the county and city for review prior to acceptance and recording of the final plat. 21. All retaining walls exceeding four (4) feet in height shall have plans and details prepared by a registered engineer or landscape architect prior to issuance of building permits. 22. The retaining wall south of Lots 108-111 abutting Street "A" shall be adjusted to accommodate a 1.5:1 buffer from the bottom of the proposed stormwater line to the bottom of the proposed retaining wall foundation. 23. Grading and construction within bluff setbacks are subject to review and approval by the city prior to issuance of grading permits. 24. All newly constructed streets and the extension of any existing streets shall be public streets, owned and maintained by the city, after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 25. All newly constructed public streets shall be designed to meet the current standard specifications and detail plate for residential streets (Detail Plate #5200), unless otherwise directed by the City Engineer. 26. Any and all conditions associated with the alignment and configuration of Street "Z" set by the Planning Commission or City Council shall be addressed by the applicant prior to acceptance and recording of the final plat. 27. The Developer shall provide a curb cut and access easement for parcel 250100400 onto Street "Z". 28. A water service lateral shall be stubbed off Street "Z's" water main for the future connection to parcel 250100400. 29. An updated geotechnical report with additional soil borings shall be provided for review and approval prior to the commencement of construction. s Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 5 of 14 30. Sidewalks shall be extended along the cul-de-sacs located off Streets "D", "G", and "Z" and shall be constructed in accordance with the city's standard specifications and detail plates for concrete sidewalks. 31. All curb ramps shall be constructed to meet ADA standards and the city's Detail Plates #5215-5215D. 32. Intersection improvements to provide pedestrian access at the intersection of Galpin Boulevard and Street "E" shall be constructed in accordance with MUTCD best management practices. 33. A detail of the proposed street lights shall be provided prior to the issuance of building permits. 34. An enumerated list of all street lights and their proposed locations shall be provided for review and approval prior to the recording of the final plat. 35. Street lights shall be installed at all intersections and at the end of each cul-de-sac subject to review and approval of the city prior to issuance of building permits. 36. The site plan shall be updated to provide proposed street grades (centerline gradients). 37. All newly constructed water mains shall be public water mains, owned and maintained by the city, after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 38. Water mains located on Streets "A" --"H" and Street "Z" shall be tied into the high-pressure zone located on Galpin Boulevard. Water main extensions on Topaz Drive and Lucy Ridge Lane shall be tied into the existing water main stubs (low-pressure zone). 39. The water main located on Street "Z" shall be tied into the existing stub off Ruby Lane and a gate valve near the connection point shall be installed. The gate valve shall be closed to separate the pressure zones. 40. The developer shall field -verify the location of all water main taps prior to the issuance of building permits and update the plans accordingly. 41. The developer's contractor shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with Engineering and Public Works Utilities prior to the commencement of any work to the water main installation and tapping. 42. Updated plans indicating the location of all underground utilities on the east side of Galpin Boulevard, along with plans and profiles of any utility crossings on the east side of Galpin Boulevard, shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 6 of 14 43. An agreement that lists the conditions and required improvements for the land swap between the developer and the city regarding Lot 163 and a portion of the Well House #3 site, shall be executed and recorded prior to the acceptance and recording of the final plat. 44. All utility crossings of potable water and sanitary and/or storm mains will require 18 inches of vertical separation and 10 feet of horizontal separation. The developer shall submit construction plans with profiles and plan views of the utilities for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 45. All utility crossings of potable water and sanitary sewer will require that the sanitary sewer main at that crossing be constructed of PVC C900 water main material. The developer shall submit construction plans indicating material type at these locations for review and approval of the city prior to issuance of building permits. 46. The developer shall submit construction plans indicating that pipe lengths of sanitary sewer mains are centered over potable water crossings. 47. Water mains shall be constructed at 7.5 feet below grade, or insulated, and constructed in conformance with the city's standard specifications and detail plates. 48. Cluster valves located around water main tees shall be installed at a minimum of 5 feet from the tees to the valves, where feasible. All valve locations and any other water main appurtenances shall be reviewed and approved by Engineering and Public Works prior to the issuance of building permits. 49. All comments and conditions regarding fire appurtenances, spacing, and location set forth by the Fire Department shall be addressed by the applicant. 50. All newly constructed sewer mains shall be public sewer mains, owned and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 51. A 30 -foot utility easement shall be recorded over the existing public sewer line, within Outlot A located near the south-central area of the preliminary plat, prior to acceptance of final plat. 52. All conditions set forth by the MCES for the direct connection and installation of an access manhole to their trunk line shall be addressed by the applicant, and all permits required for the connection and installation of the manhole shall be obtained prior to the commencement of construction. 53. The applicant shall ensure the city's sanitary sewer nomenclature is incorporated in the construction plans. 54. Profile sheets for all public utilities, including sanitary sewer, shall be required for review and approval by the city prior to issuance of building permits. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 7 of 14 55. PVC sanitary sewer pipes that will be constructed at a burial depth of 0-16 feet shall be constructed of pipe class SDR 35, burial depths of 16-26 feet shall be of pipe class SDR 26, and burial depths of greater than 26 feet shall be of pipe class C900. 56. Inverts that have a 20 -inch or greater differential shall be supplied inside drops per city standards and be constructed per the city's Detail Plate No. 2104. 57. No roadway connection shall be made to Topaz Drive. Stormwater Conditions & Wetlands The 2019 SWMP Fee is $432,183.23, pending any plan revisions. This fee will be applied to the new lots of record being created. It is calculated as shown in the table below: SURFACE WATER DEVELOPMENT FEE AREA PER ACRE FEE ACRES FEE GROSS AREA $8,320 191.0465 $1,589 506.88 ROW $8,320 16.79 $( 139,692.80 OUTLOTS $8,320 122.3114 $(1,017,630.85) NET AREA 51.9451 $432,183.23 Assessments Water and sewer partial hookups are due at the time of final plat. The partial hookup fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time. The remaining partial hookups fees are due with the building permit. Fees Based on the proposal, the following fees would be collected with the development contract: • Administration Fee: If the improvement costs are between $500,000 and $1,000,000,2% of the improvement costs. If the improvement costs exceed $1,000,000, 2.5% of the first $1,000,000 plus 1.5% of the remainder. • Surface Water Management Fee: $432,183.23 • A portion of the water hook-up charge: $2,311 /unit • A portion of the sanitary sewer hook-up charge: $691/unit • GIS fees: $25 for the plat plus $10 per parcel • Street light operating fee for one year: $300 per light Conditions of Approval 1. Wetland permitting is required due to the proximity of and proposed impacts to wetlands on site. A wetland permit application has not yet been received by the city from the applicant. Grading permits will not be issued until approved wetland permits have been received. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 8 of 14 2. Wetland review will include ensuring hydrology is maintained to all wetlands to be preserved as well as review of proposed stormwater impacts. 3. Storm sewer sizing calculations should be provided to confirm storm sewer is sized to convey the 10 -year storm event. 4. An NPDES permit and accompanying Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required prior to the start of construction. 5. An operations and maintenance plan for the proposed stomnwater management system will be required prior to approval. 6. Provide infiltration test results per MPCA Requirements in the location of each proposed infiltration area. 7. All comments and conditions set forth by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District shall be addressed by the applicant. 8. Show all existing storm sewer and other water resource -related features in plans. 9. Adjust and show all easements over the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' sanitary sewer on the preliminary and final plat. 10. Clearly indicate what storm sewer will be private and what will be public. All public storm sewer will be required to be shown in profile view. Applicant should confirm there are no conflicts with the water main or sanitary sewer throughout the site. 11. The following comments pertain to all proposed ponds that include an infiltration bench (Basins 100, 200 and 300): a. Infiltration test results will be required in the location of all proposed infiltration benches and infiltration basins. Infiltration test results have not been submitted in the location of proposed Basin 100. If filtration is to be used, the applicant will need to provide a specification for amended soils. b. The exfiltration above the piped outlet elevation should be included in the HydroCAD model and the exfiltration rate should correspond to what is presented in the infiltration test results. c. The proposed infiltration benches will be required to meet the 48-hour drawdown requirement. d. Outlets from the pond should be moved out of the permanent pond area and should be moved away from the inlet to minimize the risk of short circuiting. 12. The proposed piped outlet being modeled for Basin 400 is not shown in the plans. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 9 of 14 13. Access routes for all proposed stormwater basins are required for maintenance purposes. Applicant should callout access locations for all proposed stormwater basins. 14. A defined riprap EOF spillway will be required for all stormwater basins per details provided on Sheet 33. Applicant should include location and elevation of all EOF spillways on the storm sewer plans. 15. The soil borings provided show that there are clay soils throughout the site. Modeling should be updated to reflect the D soils present. 16. Proposed and existing HydroCAD models should be modeling the same area. There is roughly 120 acres included in the existing conditions model that is not included in the proposed conditions model. All offsite drainage should be included in the models. 17. Existing and proposed conditions drainage area maps should be updated to show the location and boundaries of all subcatchments included in the models. 18. Time of concentrations should be calculated in HydroCAD and not directly entered to confirm accuracy. Provide supporting calculations for all directly entered times of concentrations. 19. From the drainage area maps, it appears that P -LU 2-6 (P.E. Edit) in the existing model corresponds to Pond 500P in the proposed conditions model. The modeled storage for the wetland differs between the existing and proposed conditions models but no wetland impacts are shown on Sheet 37 for this wetland. Applicant should update the models so that they have the same storage modeled for the wetland. a. There is a proposed piped outlet from this wetland that is over four feet lower than the current natural spillway outlet. The applicant will be required to show that this does not change the hydrology of the existing wetland as part of the wetland permit requirements. 20. There are numerous inconsistencies between what is shown in the plans on Sheet 35 for the outlets of the stormwater basins and what is being modeled in HydroCAD and P8. Applicant will need to update the models so that they are representative of what is being shown in the plans. 21. The same total area should be modeled in P8 as in HydroCAD. 22. The model should be run for at least 50 years and should include the most recent precipitation data included in the precipitation file to get accurate removal efficiencies. 23. The modeling of the proposed stormwater ponds with filtration benches is incorrect and is overestimating the removal efficiencies of the basins. The applicant should update the model for the stormwater basins in the following way: Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 10 of 14 a. The design infiltration rate should be added to the flood pool section of the stormwater pond devices where applicable. This will model infiltration above the outlet elevation. The design infiltration rate should match what is being modeled in HydroCAD. b. The infiltration basins should be removed from the model (except for Device 600i). c. Applicant should confirm total phosphorus and total suspended solids removal requirements are still being met after the model has been updated. 24. Watersheds 201 and 600 are only modeling the impervious area. The pervious area in these watersheds should be added to the model. 25. Watershed 300 in the P8 model has 25% impervious while the corresponding HydroCAD subwatershed has 45% impervious modeled. Applicant should update the models to be consistent with one another and representative of the plans. 26. The total areas listed in the table in Section IIIA of the Stormwater Management Plan are inconsistent with the total area called out in the plans and the total area being modeled. Applicant should include the entire site in the areas shown in the table. 27. Any projects seeking a wetland alteration permit subject to this article will also be required to submit the following: Existing and proposed drainage areas to wetlands; Buffer strip plan meeting the criteria of subsections 20-411(c) and (d). 28. Sec. 20416. Mitigation. Wetland mitigation shall be undertaken on site. If this is not feasible, then mitigation may occur locally within the subwatershed. If this is not possible, then mitigation may occur outside the subwatershed, elsewhere in the city. If mitigation cannot be accomplished on site, or if the city deems it necessary to perform mitigation off site, then the applicant shall be responsible for providing off-site mitigation within the major subwatershed, as designated by the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, or purchasing wetland credits from the state wetland bank. 29. Stormwater runoff shall not be discharged into wetlands without water quality pretreatment as prescribed by City Code. 30. If a Wetland Alteration Permit is issued allowing wetland alteration, the following standards shall be followed: (1) The alteration will not have a net adverse effect on the ecological and hydrological characteristics of remaining wetland, (2) It shall be located as to minimize the impact on vegetation, (3) It shall not adversely change water flow, (4) The size of the altered area shall be limited to the minimum required for the proposed action, (5) The disposal of any excess material is prohibited within remaining wetland areas, (6) The disposal of any excess material shall include proper erosion control and nutrient retention measures, (7) Alterations to any wetland area are prohibited during waterfowl breeding season or fish spawning season, unless it is determined by the city that the wetland is not used for Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 11 of 14 waterfowl breeding or fish spawning, and (8) Alterations to wetland areas shall be mitigated in accordance with the requirements of this article if the activity results in a loss of wetland area and/or function and value of the wetland. 31. The alteration shall not alter the hydrological patterns in the remainder of the wetland, if a portion of the wetland remains, unless exempted under Sec. 20-417. Show how hydrologic patterns will not be altered for the remaining wetlands. 32. Sec. 20-405. Wetland delineation. An electronic copy of the delineated wetland boundaries must be submitted in a format compatible with the city s GIS database. 33. Sec. 20-406. Wetland classification. All wetlands delineated under Sec. 20-405 of this article that have not been previously classified shall be classified using the results from the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method for Evaluating Wetland Functions (MnRAM Version 3.0), or future versions. A MnRAM shall be completed by the property owner or applicant for each previously unclassified wetland. An electronic version of the MnRAM evaluation must be submitted to and approved by the city to establish the classification of each wetland prior to any alteration or impact to the wetland. 34. Staff review will be conditional upon the approved Wetland Replacement Plan. 35. A grading permit cannot be issued until the applicant has completed the WCA process. 36. Wetland Buffers. Wetland buffers and buffer monumentation will be required adjacent to the wetlands on site. Please indicate wetland buffer widths and locations where signage will be placed on a plan sheet. Please find additional information on signage placement in the city's guidance document. The WMO provides signs and sign posts for the cost of materials. Alternative signs (by the city or applicant) are also acceptable provided they contain similar information. 37. Sec. 19-146. Wetland elements. a. Water level fluctuations (peak elevation and duration) for wetlands shall be limited to two feet and duration not to exceed 48 hours so as to prevent the destruction of wildlife habitat and wetland vegetation. b. Sedimentation basins or sediment removal devices shall be provided prior to discharge into wetlands. c. Variable bottom contours should be considered to provide deeper holes and flat shallow benches. This feature will provide habitat for diversity of plants and wetland inhabitants for wetland mitigation sites and stormwater basins. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 12 of 14 Landscaping and Tree Preservation 1. The developer shall conduct a walk-through of the grading limits on site prior to removals with city staff to inspect for opportunities for additional tree preservation. 2. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around existing trees to be saved prior to any construction activities and remain installed until completion. 3. All trees shall be planted outside of the street right-of-way. 4. The applicant shall increase tree planting in the development to meet minimum requirements of 590 trees. 5. Buffer plantings shall be added to the east of the city well building. 6. The three oaks on city property (not inventoried) to the south of the city well building shall remain and the grading limits be adjusted to provide for preservation by avoiding any grading within the critical root zone areas of the trees. 7. Autumn Blaze maples shall be eliminated from the plant schedule. 8. Northern Pin Oak shall be replaced with white, bur, red or bicolor oak species in the plant schedule. 9. Additional selections of tree species shall expand the breadth of tree types and take into consideration soil conditions and future hardiness zone changes. 10. No tree Genus shall comprise of more than 20% of the total number of trees and no tree species shall comprise of more than 10% of the total number of trees. 11. The applicant shall revise the plans to show the bluff impact zone on both bluffs and eliminate grading within these areas. 12. Private lot boundaries shall not encroach into bluff areas. 13. Lots with significant tree cover contain conservation easements to protect the wooded areas. Lots 501, 504, 505, 530 and 531 should have protective easements over parts of the lot containing existing forest. Specifically, the rear 40 feet of Lot 501, the rear 100 feet of Lots 504 and 505, the westerly 200 feet of Lot 530, and the easterly 250-300 feet of Lot 531. Galpin Site Development — Planning Case 2019-01 March 14, 2019 Page 13 of 14 As soon as possible, provide a revised preliminary plat showing 169 lots with the engineering plans in conformance with the lot configuration. In addition, provide a revised landscaping plan, tree preservation, and lot compliance table as represented in your March 11, 2019 City Council presentation. Final plat documents and application must be submitted to the city 35 days prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Conditions of the preliminary plat approval must be addressed for final plat approval. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat approval. A unique plat name must be included with the final plat submittal. The rezoning of the residential lots shall not be official until approval of the final plat and execution of the project development contract. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (952) 227-1139 or by email at kaanenson(a.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Enclosure ec: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer Todd Hoffman, Parks & Recreation Director Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resource Specialist Eric Tessman, Building Official Paul Cherne, Pioneer Engineering gAplant2019 planning cases\19-01 galpin site preliminary plat and ra ning pudkity council 3-I1-19\appmval letter.doex ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: 1. Submit three (3) sets of full size, 50 scale construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Improvements: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. C. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading It. Street lights & signs i. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping 7. Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (8'%" x I1"), and a digital copy in .tif format. 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc format. 9. Lot tabulations. Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will resu& in delaying consideration offinal plat before the City Council "tom RILEY~r�f� PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK 18681 lake Drive East Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-607-6512 WATERSHED DISTRICT www.rpbcwd.org Memorandum To: Chanhassen Planning Commission c/o Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director From: Terry Jeffery, CWD Subject. Proposed Single -Family Residential Development Galpin Boulevard Planning Case 2018-12 — Public Comment Meeting Date: March 1, 2019 c: Claire Bleser; Administrator Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District This memorandum should be considered in the context that Lake Ann has some of the best water quality in the District and that is, in large part, a result of the limited development around the lake (Appendix A). Urbanization of a watershed will always result in degradation of water quality. Steps should be taken to minimize and mitigate these impacts to this unique resource that is so central to Chanhassen's park system and provides so many recreational and educational opportunities. The preservation of woodland and wetland areas, especially those more proximal to Lake Ann through better site design practices such as density transfer are strongly supported. The Center for Watershed Protection (CWP) published the Better Site Design Handbook in 1998 and numerous entities, including Chanhassen, have incorporated these strategies into their guidance and regulatory program. The goal of Better Site Design is to preserve existing hydrologic features and functions while reducing impervious surfaces through the preservation of existing natural features. This most commonly occurs through open space design, such as what was proposed in the Lennar plan dated December 5, zor8 (as revised) and what was successfully used in Preserve at Bluff Creek. The Minnesota Stormwater Manual references Better Site Design as a method of reducing impacts to water quality that result from urbanization of previously undeveloped land. At the time the Better Site Design Handbook was published, the CWP found more than 30 peer reviewed studies showing sharp declines in stream, lake, and wetland qualities when the impervious cover in upstream watersheds exceed in percent. Currently, as illustrated on page 3, the immediate watershed is almost entirely undeveloped. Some of these declines include wanner water temperatures, increased pollutant loading, increased flooding, increased bacterial levels, decline in the diversity of aquatic insects and native fish species, lower spawning success, a decline in wetland plant and animal diversity, and many more impacts. By providing the buffer that the December 5, 2m81ennar plan showed, many of these impacts can be offset or mitigated over time. Were the land to develop straight zoning, the losses for Lake Ann, its water quality and ecosystem, and the people of Chanhassen and the Watershed District would be immeasurable, and likely irreversible. Thank you for your time and attention to this pressing matter. U 2 APPENDIX A - Lake Ann Data The following graphs show that Lake Ann has the lowest mean growing season Chlorophyll -a and the greatest water clarity as measured by the mean secchi disk depth within the RPBCWD. The last figure shows the current low level of development within the Lake Ann watershed (from: Lake Lucy and Lake Ann Al J -Ai to RPRCWD. 2011). U11 nunu.aw...r .......r.,... 2018 Growing Season Mean Secchi Disk Depth b v c C4 CRbCy.C4 U� Deep Lakes 0 0.5 Shallow Lakes y 1 Deep Lakes A1.5 Standard 2 — —Shallow Lakes A 2.5 Standard r 3 u v v� 3.5 4 2018 Growing Season Mean Chlorophyll -a 80 70 0 Deep Lakes ?,50 .40 Shallow Lakes WO — -Shallow Lakes X20 — Standard U 10 —Deep Lakes Standard 0 >, b .�C 'O "� >..� •d U_ Lam, h F+ v1 .7 E ei, Lana U. y�mUu cv�.ne�c;ei F.. Hgn O.ee.y RevE.nux Hglnvay IMisbuVOXla MlilulgnL lnw OanWy R.sAMel A45un Dm R.. M NfvxILP.NOpII Ope Waw, SudnEan L. Ow R. �v tow aM R.Y.wiW WeMM MEM GtlTMOFLWG WFOM01 IW l�q's'u /nn U.Ntq]Me 1VlMO Pc (a -oJ CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 640 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the city's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property described within Exhibit A from Rural Residential District, RR, to Planned Unit Development Residential, PUD -R. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: The Park Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for single-family detached housing. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more -sensitive proposal. The development will preserve 50 acres of woods adjacent to Lake Ann. There are a number of housing collections with a variety of housing styles and exterior materials within each collection serving different life stages. Except as modified by this PUD ordinance, the development shall comply with the requirements of the Residential Low and Medium Density District, RLM. The property shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. 1. Preliminary Plat (revised plan dated April 4, 2019) SCA14NED 2. Landscaping Plan (revised plan dated April 4, 2019) 3. Tree Preservation Plan FAA 4. House Plans b. Permitted Uses 1. The permitted uses in this zoning district shall be single-family detached houses and their accessory uses. House plans include the Lennar Lifestyle, Luxury, Landmark, Classic, and 31 Villa home plans or similar or equivalent plans. C. Design Standards 1. Development - Amenities Design 01 Integrate pathways with the local street system to maximize access and flexibility of use. 2. House designs • There shall be a mix and a variety of housing materials. • Linear repetitive streetscape appearance and building facades shall be avoided by providing variation between the front elevations. No two identical facades shall be located next to each other. • The same front or rear elevations shall not be located directly across from one another. • No similar material/colors shall be located adjacent to each other. • There shall be articulation of wall planes, a variety of roof forms, variation in roof heights or other architectural treatments. • If side loaded garages are incorporated into the development, the front facing wall must be architecturally integrated with the design of the home (no blank wall). d. Lot Requirements and Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks: THE PARK COMPLIANCE TABLE The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following tables displays those setbacks. Lots with a minimum 90 feet of frontage Minimum Lot Dimensions and Maximum Lot Cover Lot Area SF Lot Width(Feet) Lot Depth(Feet) Max Lot Cover SF 15,000 90 125 5,500 cs✓ucm Front Setback Rear Setback Side Yard Setback I Comer Setback CR 117 Setback 20 feet' 25 feet 7.5 feet 20 feet 50 feet cj icch with sidewalk Bluffs: 30 -foot setback, 20 -foot impact zone. Wetland Buffer Setback: 20 feet. Lots with a minimum 65 feet of fron AQP Minimum Lot Dimensions and Maximum Lot Cover Lot Area S Lot Width(Feet) Lot Depth(Feet) Max Lot Cover SF 8,450 1 65 125 4,400 Lot.&ethackc Front Setback Rear Setback Side Yard Setback Corner Setback CR 117 Setback 25 feet 25 feet 7.5 feet 20 feet 50 feet u.uas. w -mut setback, LU -root Impact zone. Wetland Buffer Setback: 20 feet. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this l Ph day of March, 2019 by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. 'L -v Todd Gerhardt, City Manager "I &A. - Elise Ryan, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on June 6, 2019) IWXgoItt711i�� Legal Description: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter corner of said Section 10; thence South along the North- South Quarter line of said Section 10 as distance of 409.69 feet; thence West along a line parallel with the South line of the North Half of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 435.76 feet to the centerline of the Excelsior -Shakopee Road; thence Northeasterly along said centerline a distance of 419.39 feet to the North line of side Section 10; thence East along the North line of said Section 10 to the point of beginning, all according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof. That part of the South half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 23 Carver County, Minnesota lying easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117, also known as Galpin Boulevard, and lying North of the South 186.00 feet of said South half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter thereof. Together with: That part westerly 183.00 feet of each of the following two tracts: (1) That part of the South 186.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 51 Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117 (also known as Galpin Lake Road and formerly known as Chaska and Excelsior Road and as Excelsior and Shakopee Road). (2) That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the P Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117 (also known as Galpin Lake Road and formerly known as Chaska and Excelsior Road and as Excelsior and Shakopee Road). 5 Which lies northerly of lines described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 08 seconds West, along the North line of said South half of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 588.71 feet, to the beginning of the lines to be described; thence South 65 degrees 37 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 98.69 feet; thence Northwesterly a distance of 141.37 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 180.00 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, the chord of said curve is 137.77 feet in length and bears North 46 degrees 52 minutes 45 seconds West; thence North 69 degrees 22 minutes 45 seconds West, tangent to said curve a distance of 40.00 feet and said line there terminating. Aanenson, Kate From: Michael McGonagill <strategicconvictions@icloud.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 6:06 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Cc: McGonagill, Michael Subject: Lennar Meeting Kate; good (early) morning to you. Question: Can you direct Lennar or someone to talk directly about the following items in their presentation next week? If I could ask questions I would be going to the following (under the revised PUD plan): 1. Show me the revised grading plan; and point out the differences 2. Show me the revised tree plan; and point out the differences 3. Talk about how folks will access the park before Gora property sells 4. Will you have any sort of parking at the trail head access points in the new development and when will that be in place in the development schedule thanks MM Michael McGonagill strategacconvictionsAicloud.com 612 940 2095 Steckling, Jean From: Steve Albrecht <salbrecht8791 @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 12:20 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Prince's land development proposal We are in favor of the PUD plan with 54 acres set aside for lake Ann park expansion We live at 6951 Tecumseh Lane in Chanhassen Thanks Steckling, Jean From: timleberle@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 12:47 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Prince land development Please support the PUD plan to give the city as much parkland as possible. Thanks Sent from my iPhone Steckling, Jean From: Nick Lawson <nicklawson311c@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 2:21 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Prince land/Developmentopinion Hello Kate, I just wanted to extended my opinion on the proposal of the Prince land by my house. Of the options that have been brought to my attention I would vote for the 'Proposed PUD" option that maintains as much of the beautiful woods as possible. My family moved to Chanhassen in 2015 into the Greenwood shores neighborhood and my 3 kids, wife and myself as well as most of our neighborhood use and enjoy those woods every summer. It would be a shame to let them be developed if there is a viable option to save them that is on the table. Part of what makes Chanhassen so great is its parks and natural woods. Its something you cant get back once its given up. Please do all that you can to save that area for future generations to use and enjoy and not just reminisce about how great it was when we were young.. Thanks for your time. III see you on the 5th. -Nick Lawson - 612.232.3464 7071 Redman Ln, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Steckling, Jean From: Jim Rosendahl <jimr@systium.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 3:48 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Cc: City Council Subject: Galpin Boulevard Property As a resident of Chanhassen and the Greenwood Shores neighborhood for 24 years I am in favor of the Proposed PUD. It would be a big plus for Lake Ann Park! Jim Rosendahl 7090 Tecumseh Lane Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Steckling, Jean From: Stephen Barnes <s.m.bames@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 3:49 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Prince Property Development Kate, I just wanted to make known my support for the PUD plan (not the original plan). I hope this helps guide the negotiations and approvals by the council. Thanks! —Steve Barnes 7100 Utica Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 612.237.0660 Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 9:11 AM' To: Steckling, Jean Subject: Fwd: Prince's Land proposal. Sent from my Whone Begin forwarded message: From: Mike Boehm <mikeboehm III474na,yahoo.com> Date: February 27, 2019 at 9:01:50 AM CST To: "kaanensonna ci.chanhassen.mn.us" <kaanensonkci.chanhassen.mn.us>, "council(&ci.chanhassen.mn.us" <council e,ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Prince's Land proposal. Reply -To: "mikeboehm111474@yahoo.com" <mikeboehm111474(a,yahoo.com> Hello, Just sending an email in case I can not make it to the March 5th meeting. I am heavily in favor of the proposed PUD. I can not support the concept plan. Thank you Mike Boehm Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 2:20 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Lake Ann/Susan Development From: Chad Johnson <chadmtka@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 11:47 AM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Lake Ann/Susan Development Good morning Kate, I wanted to reach out to you via email since I will not be able to attended the City councils meeting on the Lake Ann/ Susan development project. I have been a resident in the greenwood shores neighborhood for over 17 years. My family and I have enjoyed the natural beauty of this area and would like to keep it that way for others. Everything from the paved path that reaches the length of the east side of Ann up to the park, to the foot paths that split between Susan into dense woodlands has kept this a one of a kind area available for everyone to enjoy. With the minimal disturbance of the southside with the exception of a park and additional trails, In my opinion, the PUD plan would be the best way to accomplish this. Sincerely, The Johnson Family Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 2:22 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: 16 residents support Proposed PUD of Galpin property From: Barry Dallavalle <barry.dallavalle@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 20191:55 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Cc: City Council <Council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: 16 residents support Proposed PUD of Galpin property To Chanhassen Planning Commission and City Council, The following residents unanimously support the Proposed PUD plan for the Galpin property. We wish to thank Lennar and our city planners while working with the community to achieve this well -conceived proposal. We urge its recommendation. Our reasons are stated at the bottom of this letter. Scott and Tamara Sather 7090 Utica Ln Mike and Kressin Krause 7050 Utica Ln Tim and Sharon McCotter 7000 Utica Ln Bill and Joanne Lambrecht 6990 Utica Ln Barry and Laura Dallavalle 6960 Utica Ln Daryl and Kim Weispfennig 6930 Utica Ln Dale and Gloria Carlson 6900 Utica Ln Pat Mohr and Maureen Lord Mohr 6890 Utica Terrace Ron and Mary Knudten 6850 Utica Terrace Rob Long and Louise Ou-Yang 6830 Utica Terrace Chris and Nicole Liwienski 6721 Point Lake Lucy Bryan and Bonnie McCoskey 6720 Point Lake Lucy Matt and Suzanne Woods 6745 Lakeway Drive Betsy Randall 1571 Lake Lucy Rd John and Anne Wicka 1601 Lake Lucy Rd Al and Mary Weingart 1685 Steller Ct Reasons supporting our recommendation: 1. More green space to mitigate runoff damage to Lakes Lucy and Ann and the Riley Creek watershed. Many of the co-signers here have willingly contributed significant time and money to control the invasive plant growth in Lake Lucy each year. 2. More green space for the surrounding community to enjoy the natural beauty and numerous wildlife of both lakes and their environs. 3. Preserve the long -envisioned legacy of Lake Ann Park. Respectfully submitted, Bary Dallavalle 6960 Utica Ln 952-737-8433 1 t �. 9 Steckling, Jean From: Pat Harding <PSJCAHarding@msn.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 8:39 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Support for PUD Dear Ms. Aanenson, We would like to voice our support for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for the land surrounding Lake Ann. We believe that dedicating the land as park space would the best option for the City of Chanhassen and for Carver County. Thank you for taking into consideration the input of the residents in making this decision. Sincerely, Patrick Harding Steckling, Jean From: Anna Harding <hardi180@umn.edu> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 8:41 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Support for PUD Dear Ms. Aanenson, We would like to voice our support for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for the land surrounding Lake Ann. We believe that dedicating the land as park space would the best option for the City of Chanhassen and for Carver County. Thank you for taking into consideration the input of the residents in making this decision. Sincerely, Anna Harding Steckling, Jean From: Suzanne Harding <psjcaharding@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 4:25 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Support for PUD Dear Ms. Aanenson, We would like to voice our support for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for the land surrounding Lake Ann. We believe that dedicating the land as park space would the best option for the City of Chanhassen and for Carver County. Thank you for taking into consideration the input of the residents in making this decision. Sincerely, Suzanne Harding it Steckling Jean From: Alyson Duneman <alysond28@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 6:31 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Galpin Boulevard Property PUD Dear Planning Commission Director, I would just like to send a quick word in my support of the PUD plan. In an effort to preserve the invaluable beauty our lake shore and our highly sought after and well cared for Lake Ann Park, I am strongly requesting that the city does approve the concept plan. Kind Regards, Alyson Duneman 612-272-6297 '3 Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 9:17 AM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Lake Ann/Susan Development From: Chad Johnson <chadmtka@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 11:47 AM To: Aanenson, Kate <kanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Lake Ann/Susan Development Good morning Kate, I wanted to reach out to you via email since I will not be able to attended the City councils meeting on the Lake Ann/ Susan development project. I have been a resident in the greenwood shores neighborhood for over 17 years. My family and I have enjoyed the natural beauty of this area and would like to keep it that way for others. Everything from the paved path that reaches the length of the east side of Ann up to the park, to the foot paths that split between Susan into dense woodlands has kept this a one of a kind area available for everyone to enjoy. With the minimal disturbance of the southside with the exception of a park and additional trails, In my opinion, the PUD plan would be the best way to accomplish this. Sincerely, The Johnson Family Steckling, Jean From: Sent: To: Subject: Include in the packet Aanenson, Kate Thursday, February 28, 2019 10:17 AM Steckling, Jean FW: Comments on Prince's Galpin Property From: Hoffman, Todd <thoffman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 201910:16 AM To: Gerhardt, Todd <TGerhardt@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: Comments on Prince's Galpin Property Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone ----- -- Original message ------- From: Marcia Mclean <dmclean602Ca g nail.com> Date: 2/28/19 10:02 AM (GMT -06:00) To: "Ryan, Elise" <ERvan ,ci.chanhassen.mn.us>, aallerna.ci.chanhassen.mn.us, "Hoffman, Todd" <thoffrnanla,ci.chanhassen mn us> Cc: Dianne <dmc1ean602Ca gmail.com> Subject: Comments on Prince's Galpin Property Please share my thoughts at all meetings related to Prince's Galpin property. Thank you. It has been legally accepted that Prince Rogers Nelson left no will. He did, however, leave his thoughts, his views, and his philosophy. One only has to look at his discography and approach the lyrics on literal and figurative levels. One only has to consider his many philanthropic endeavors. One only has to see the devastation he felt upon the loss of his child. Thus, I petition all parties involved to rethink the "Galpin project" in light of what Prince would have wanted. I propose that the property be given to the city of Chanhassen to become an extension of Lake Ann with an Arts Center and a playground for children with disabilities within its boundaries. Would this be easy to do at this point? No. Consider Prince's famous work ethic and it can be done, however. He loved Chanhassen and it is time for Chanhassen to show its love for him. To obtain the property and create this adjunct Paisley Park, inclusive, accepting and a place where people can play, refresh, and just be, funding would be necessary. Create a 501c(3)? Endless resources are "out there". There is no doubt that the "Purple Family" all over the world would respond, as well as the PRN Alumni Foundation, the People of Paisley Park, the Timberwolves, the Lynx, Tavis Smiley, Spike Lee, Oprah Winfrey, Sheila E., his photographers, and COUNTLESS others. They could give monitarily and/or in creative and imaginative ways. Further, would his heirs donate a record from the Vault to raise money? A "Go Fund Me" Account could be created? Prince always went to "The Max". He sang "When I go, I go, I go to the Max". Let's all continue affirming his legacy by doing exactly that "4 him". Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Friday, March 01, 2019 11:46 AM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Addendum to Email Marcia McLean sent 2-28-19 From: Andrew Aller <aaller@mchsi.com> Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 11:33 AM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: Addendum to Email Marcia McLean sent 2-28-19 Addendum to yesterday email Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Marcia Mclean <dmclean602Ca Smail.corn> Date: March 1, 2019 at 9:40:34 AM CST To: ervan(a.ci.chanhassen.mn.us, thoffman(a,ci.chanhassen.mn.us, aallerAinchsi.com Cc: Dianne <dmclean602@gmail.com> Subject: Addendum to Email Marcia McLean sent 2-28-19 Please consider these additional thoughts. Yesterday a friend asked me why I was writing to you. I replied it was because I felt a connection to Chanhassen. From the first time I came up there, I loved it. Perhaps, it is because I grew up in and lived in a town with a seemingly similar character and "rhythm of life". In my opinion, unfortunately, my hometown has not evolved positively. Farmland and woods have been consumed by developers and the town is filled with so many housing developments and endless cars. While I realize progress and change is inevitable and typically necessary, the officials in my city did not appear to be very thoughtful in their decision-making. Thus, I respectfully encourage you, members of government, in Chanhassen to consider the environmental effects of the decisions you make about the Prince Galpin Property. Land is a limited commodity and environmentally sensitive. There are many places housing can be constructed. Further, I continue to encourage all involved to think about using it in a manner that would have been Prince -approved and benefit ALL of the people of Chanhassen and be in keeping with the uniqueness and specialness of the city. I do not want what happened to my hometown to happen to Chanhassen. Sincerely, Marcia McLean Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 1:44 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Planned Unit Development From: Ray Gaylord <rgaylord@qualitymold-inc.com> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 1:42 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Cc: City Council <Council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Planned Unit Development We would like to voice our opinion on the Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for land surrounding Lake Ann. We believe that dedicating the land as park space is the best option for the City of Chanhassen and Carver County. Thank you for your consideration, Pat and Sue Harding 0 Virus -free. www.avast.com I(� Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:53 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Galpin Boulevard Property PUD From: Alyson Duneman <alysond28@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 6:31 AM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Galpin Boulevard Property PUD Dear Planning Commission Director, I would just like to send a quick word in my support of the PUD plan In an effort to preserve the invaluable beauty our lake shore and our highly sought after and well cared for Lake Ann Park, I am strongly requesting that the city does approve the concept plan. Kind Regards, Alyson Duneman 612-272-6297 Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:54 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: 7141 Galpin Boulevard Comments & Pictures Attachments: DS -City Development - Aug 2018.pptx From: david senior <davidtsenior@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 7:57 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Cc: Trish Ann Wisell <trish.wisell@yahoo.com> Subject: 7141 Galpin Boulevard Comments & Pictures M Kate - my wife & I bought the property located at 7431 Windmill Drive, Chanhassen just 12 months ago. We love the neighborhood, neighbors and City. The Prince property development as proposed I have concerns about how close the Concept plan comes to the back of all neighbors property lines without any significant tree buffer, and considering the existing wetlands which do not seem to have been correctly considered. Our property gives a unique insight into why this area is so wet as we have a city storm drain in our back yard! I have attached 2 slides that show the back yard & the view of the Prince property from our backyard showing the wetlands & outlet from the storm drain. I understand the desire of the City to expand the parkland, but have to agree with the 2 Planning Commission Council members & many neighbors that had serious reservations on the plan as submitted in the July meeting. I just want to add our voices to that concern as we were on vacation during the last meeting time. I recognize you may not have time to come visit, but we do extend that offer given the gravity of what is being proposed. Best Regards, David & Trish Senior CONCEPT PLAN ISSUES FOR 7141 GALPIN BOULEVARD... THIS IS A CITY STORMDRAIN WHICH WE MAINTAIN AT PERSONAL COST. WITHOUT MAINTENANCE THIS WOULD BE ANOTHER ALGAE & DEBRIS EYESORE. WHILE OUR PROPERTY IS FENCED IN ALL AROUND, THERE IS AN EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY FOR CITY ACCESS TO THE STORM DRAIN WHICH REGULARLY OVERFLOWS INTO THE WETLANDS AT THE BACK. r. n M x y ....y. •- - y y 1 1 4C�.R � o.c �i�'7 � t N �-. ..Iw` �A y P'�•_ -may. Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:54 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Proposed Development on Galpin -----Original Message ----- From: Chrissy Boberg <cnboberg@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2018 12:15 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Proposed Development on Galpin I am writing in in support of the proposed development of the land off of Galpin. My family and I have lived in Chanhassen for over 10 years and currently live at 1321 Heather Court. We live close to Lake Ann and have enjoyed that and other parks in the area. After looking at the planes it looks like the developer is offering up to the city around 100 of the 188 acres. Of the 100 acres given to the city it appears the plan has the Lake Ann Park expanded to the west side of the lake. We have often visited that park and it would be wonderful to be able to walk almost entirely around the lake with this expansion. It seems very generous and responsible of the developer to offer such a large part of the property to the city to preserve green space for all to use and enjoy. We strongly hope that the city supports this plan at the upcoming meetings. Thank you, Mike Boberg and Family 1 Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:54 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: draft for consideration From: Gordie Hampson <gordie.hampson@cushwake.com> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 2:01 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: FW: draft for consideration Dear City Council, Planning Commission and Staff: Attention: Kate Aanenson: kaanenson(cbci.chanhassen.mn.us My family and I have lived in Chanhassen for 26 years at 7003 Sandy Hook Circle. We understand that the 188 acres on Galpin Road is being considered for development. I have reviewed both plans that the developer has submitted to the city. We very strongly support the plan which shows the majority of the units on the west side of the property. Not sure how the developer was persuaded up to this point, however, it seems pretty amazing that they are offering to deed approximately 100 acres to the City of Chanhassen. This would really open up the two lakes which have been non -accessible until nowl This seems like a huge win for everyone in the community! We understand that the developer could legally develop adjacent to the lake as presented in the first plan. We hope the city supports the second plan proposed by the developer at the Planning Commission meeting July 17'h. On behalf of our family, we would enthusiastically express our support for the second plan of the proposed project. Thank you, Gordie Hampson and Family. Gordie Hampson Senior Director Brokerage Services Direct: +1 952 465 3310 Mobile: +1 612 366 6139 gordie.hampson@cushwake.com 3500 American Blvd W, Suite 200 Bloomington, MN 55431 1 USA cushmanwakefield.com The information contained in this email (including any attachments) is confidential, may be subject to legal or other professional privilege and contain copyright material, and is intended for use by the named recipient(s) only. Access to or use of this email or its attachments by anyone else is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you may not use, disclose, copy or distribute this email or its attachments (or any part thereof), nor take or omit to take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or email and delete it, and all copies thereof, including all attachments, from your system. Any confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost because this email has been sent to you by mistake. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to reduce the risk of transmitting software viruses, we accept no liability for any loss or damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or unapproved access. Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:55 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Proposed Galpin Plan From: Dewing Scott <dewscott@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2018 10:24 AM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Proposed Galpin Plan Attention Kate Aanenson; My family and I have lived in Chanhassen for 20 years, currently at 6735 Mulberry Circle. We understand the 188 acres on Galpin Road is being considered for development. I have had a chance review both plans the developer has submitted to the city. We strongly support the plan, which shows the majority of the units on the east side of the property. It is a great position to have the Developer to agree to offer approximately 100 acres to the city of Chanhassen. Everybody in the community and area will benefit from this layout with the ability to walk it and enjoy the added space. We spend a lot of time outdoors and look forward to seeing this preserved for all. Please express my families' support for the project. We understand the developer could legally develop adjacent to the lake. We hope the city supports the second plan proposed by the developer at upcoming Planning Commission meetings. Thank you, - Scott Dewing and Family rm Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:55 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: 7141 Galpin PUD Concept From: Tim Nordberg <nord0296@gmaii.com> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 3:11 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: 7141 Galpin PUD Concept Re: 7141 Galpin PUD Concept Hi Kate, I attended the 7141 Galpin PUD Concept Review session on Tuesday to learn more about the Galpin Concept and really appreciated the opportunity to learn more about the process, the city and developer's ideas and public's opinions on the matter. I know the session's public commentary has passed, but I wanted to take the time to send over some of my own thoughts, many came up in retrospect of attending the meeting and hearing what was said. Hopefully you can share this with anyone involved in the back -and - forth with the Concept Development. One takeaway I had from the meeting I had was few proposed solutions or additional ideas to consider. Nearly all in the public seemed clearly worried about environmental impact and preservation or trees / nature, while clearly the developer cares most about economics, i.e. profit. The two notions aren't necessarily polar opposites (developer profit vs environmental impacts), but they definitely trade off each other. I wonder if on the South side of the development the path connection into Lake Ann's park system could be considered along the north edge of; within, or near the current tree cover. It would help with several of the concerns I heard in the meeting: Poorly or under marked wetland area within the Southern trees - it is really wet there, with often standing water for 4 months of the year. Development would impact the environment due to filling in the space, but also potentially push water back on other existing properties that back up to the land. Buffer between current homes and new development - especially important if realistically considering 55' lou in this area with high percentage lot coverage. A proper buffer should add value and desire to the lou abutting it new development making it a positive for current residents and developers alike. Preservation of Trees - during the meeting I heard this was a priority within the city overall within long term plans (i.e. 2040 review). It may be true that "replacing" if removed trees is technically allowed, but can you consider planting hundreds of new, young trees the same as replacing 30-50+ year old woods equivalent and adequate "replacement"? Hopefully it can be considered, the idea came to mind while I was enjoying a run along the Bluff Creek trail, portions nicely tucked into and around the trees are one of the things I really enjoy since moving to Chanhassen a few years ago. I have come to appreciate the City's commitment to excellence in Parks, Trails and outdoor activities (Walking, Bicycling, Running). I would love for this commitment to hold true in new developments rather than see "Trail Connections" run along a sidewalk or within a dense neighborhood. Further items I had thought of, and wanted to reiterate with my communication: 1. The Galpin Road project really needs to be closely tied to this planning. The proposed development seems to be roughly the size of Longacres, but it is effectively forced to put all traffic on Galpin while Longacres has Hwy 41 on the West Side. Galpin is already difficult to manage (as a pedestrian or in a car) near Majestic due to traffic flow including numerous cars rolling through or completely missing the stop signs at Sugar Bush Park (Galpin and Brinker). Traffic from nearly 200 additional homes would have a significant impact here that may be difficult to properly estimate with a simple traffic study. Galpin to the North (into Shorewood / Hennepin Cry) and Lake Lucy Rd do not seem suitable for significant increases either. 2. Housing density and lot coverage may be within rules (perhaps pushing the limits), but when I look at similar new developments I always worry about places for small children to play without ending up on the road. Cul-de-sacs help (because they somewhat create a safe place _in the road_ to play, but in the concept plan the cul-de-sacs were all targeting the "Empty Nester" home styles (likely without small children). Often in these new developments I see the streets lined with signs and flags (i.e. "Drive like your children live here", "Caution kids at play"), highlighting the safety risks of such layouts, density and lot coverage. 3. I don't fully understand the need to line up the road connections to Hunter and Longacres, especially the alignment with Hunter seems to have an immediate challenge with the large holding pond / wetland space adjacent to the road. Relaxing this need may help offer more favorable layouts within the usable land on the property. On the positive side, I really appreciate the concept that expands Lake Ann's paths and the City's long term plans for further trails and connections. The more options we have, the better for the enjoyment and health of those in the community. I really believe these concepts are primary drivers that attract people to moving to the City of Chanhassen in the first place -- it was for my wife and I. Thinking of large developments like this reminds me of the praise early Minneapolis planners now receive in setting up the groundwork for their interconnected trail system (Lake and River trails, Parkway system, etc...). This is a key chance to ensure we develop an exceptional shared natural resources (Lakes and Trails) for everyone in our community to enjoy for many years to come. Ultimately I agree with the Planning Committee's final points, especially that neither of the concepts proposed thus far seem to respect the land, but with enough effort an acceptable compromise between the Environment, the City, current residents and the developers could be made. Best Regards, Tim Nordberg 2126 Majestic Way, Chanhassen d a, Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:55 PM To: Steckiing, Jean Subject: FW: Galpin Property - PUD From: Meredith McGuirk <meremcguirk@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 5:15 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: Galpin Property - PUD July 17, 2018 Planning Commission City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O.Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Planning Commission Members, We recently learned of the Planned Unit Development for the Galpin Property, formerly owned by Prince. We write today to formerly register our opposition to the plan. We are residents of Chanhassen in the Lucy Ridge neighborhood, adjacent to the PUD land. Interestingly, the concept review offered by Lennar on page 2 states that the "existing neighborhood to the North (Ashling Meadows) provides two existing road stubs to the subject property." This is inaccurate. Ashling Meadows provides one existing road stub, while our neighborhood, a 16 unit custom home development contains the other. The current plan proposes direct access through the Lucy Ridge neighborhood. We oppose the PUD in its current form for the following reasons: • Safety. We are a 16 home development currently attached to a 45 home development, commonly called Ashling Meadows. The one street leaving our community is already heavily flooded with traffic from Ashling Meadows. With one access road out of neighborhood residents cutting through often travel well beyond the speed limit and ignore stop signs, causing significant hazards to the small children living in our neighborhood. The same road proposed as a pass through to the PUD property contains a bus stop for dozens of elementary children aged k-5. I cannot imagine the additional safety hazard caused by the increased flow of traffic from another adjoining neighborhood twice the size. Simply stated, the current plan is only acceptable if the Commission disregards public safety to the children in our neighborhood. • Environmental. I think it is reasonable that even with the VERY BEST construction and water management techniques, given the proximity of proposed development to Lakes Lucy and Ann, it is, as a practical matter, impossible to prevent harmful phosphorous runoff (especially at the outset), and to furthermore expect the preservation of Lake Ann's pristine quality and clarity in concert with the proposed development would be naive and reckless. • Please also refer to Donna and Brian Strauss' letter, dated July 4, 2018. We concur with all statements raised in their letter to the Commission and City Council. It is my sincere hope that the Planning Commission and City Council will consider alternative road access points. Alternatively I urge the Commission to consider the development of a smaller community ending in a cul de sac connecting to our community that will be less hazardous and disruptive to current community members. While I understand the desire to have several access points, I also find it alarming that the Commission would not consider the disruptive and significant impact this will have on neighborhoods developed almost 15 years ago. Sincerely, Meredith and Greg McGuirk 1770 Lucy Ridge Court a�s Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:55 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Galpin Development - Staff Report From: jbrandall@aol.com <jbrandall@aol.com> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 8:49 AM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Re: Galpin Development - Staff Report Kate, After reading the Staff Report I have a few questions: Page 6 last paragraph: I assume this paragraph is referring to the North lots which are the only ones listed as 15,000 sf if so the number of lots may not be correct. Would you please explain why/how the development plan is not consistent with the Park Comp Plan Looking at scenario 2 and reading the small print, it looks as though they will be requesting variances' for lot area size on both the central and south lots. Betsy --Original Message— From: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson(c ci.chanhassen.mn.us> To: jbrandall <ibrandall(o)aol.com> Sent: Tue, Jul 10, 2018 10:26 am Subject: RE: Galpin Development Betsy, The developer is requesting the PUD, which preserves the large area adjacent to Lake Ann. The staff report should be available by the end of the day Thursday. You can address any concerns to me and I will forward then to the Planning Commission and the City Council Kate Kathryn Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director CITY OF CHANHASSEN PH. 952.227.1139 .... _, FX. 952.227.1110 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us From: <jbrandall@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 10:19 AM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Galpin Development Kate, When might the staff report/recommendations be posted for the development? Do you know which concept plan the city might be recommending? Pleases let me know if I should be directing my questions to someone else. Regards, Betsy Randall 1571 Lake Lucy Road ay Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:56 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Galpin Blvd Proposed Development -----Original Message ----- From: Julie Witt <juliewitt20@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2018 11:01 AM To: Aanenson, Kate <kanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Re: Galpin Blvd Proposed Development Thanks Kate. I appreciate the information. I'm not sure I will be able to join future meetings so I will take you up on the offer to leave my feedback with you. Comments are below. My vote if I had to choose between the 2 would be for concept #2. This concept builds 199 homes on 88 acres. Why this plan is better: 1. Less impact to wetlands. One of the things I love about Chanhassen is how much natural land there is. I am concerned how many trees the first concept will take down and the disruption to nature it will create. I would love to see Chanhassen utilize the undeveloped acres for trails instead. It is a beautiful piece of land and I would appreciate the ability for the public to use part of it. 2. Variety of price ranges. 65' and 90' lots will probably still be above average home prices especially with the opportunity for families to add upgrades (having priced Lennar homes before). One question, would the city consider adding trails for biking and/or hiking to the undeveloped land? Thanks for you consideration as you assess the available plans. Julie Witt > On Jun 27, 2018, at 8:01 AM, Aanenson, Kate <kanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> wrote: > Julie, > There will be a number of opportunities for you to give input into the proposed development. There is a concept review going to the Planning Commission on July 17th. You can review the staff report online on the city's website and should be available on July 12th. You can attend that meeting or submit your comments in writing to me and I will share with the Planning Commission and City Council. The staff report outlines the review process, after the concept review they will come go through preliminary plat with another public hearing at the Planning Commission. The developer has expressed they would have a neighborhood meeting. > Kate > Kathryn Aanenson, AICP > Community Development Director > CITY OF CHANHASSEN > PH. 952.227.1139 > FX. 952.227.1110 > www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us > -----Original Message----- > From: Julie Witt <juliewitt20@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 7:00 PM > To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> > Subject: Galpin Blvd Proposed Development will ou > Hi Kate, > Will the public be able to give input to the decision for this development? > Thanks, > Julie a5- Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:56 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: 18-12 Galpin Development From: Barry Dallavalle <barry.daIlava lie @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 9, 2018 2:46 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: 18-12 Galpin Development Hi Ms. Aanenson, My name is Barry Dallavalle and am current President of the Lake Lucy Homeowners Association. As you might expect, our association membership is interested in how this development moves forward. Currently, there appears to be two alternatives, a "density trade" and a "yield plan". Has the planning group settled on either? Or would the selection be the subject of the planning commission meeting on the 17th? Would you or another on your staff be interested in receiving our comments prior to or at the meeting? Thank you, Barry Dallavalle 6960 Utica Ln 952-737-8433 ac Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:57 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Prince's land off Galpin -----Original Message ----- From: Holly Nelson <hollysn9@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 9:12 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Prince's land off Galpin I just read through the development plans from Lennar for Prince's land. Those 55' and 65' lots make me sad. I was hoping this would be an elite development in Chan and instead it's sadly dense. I read their justification that if they spread it out they'd fit that many lots but are condensing it for the parkland. It would be so much nicer to have the 90' lots through the whole development and have the park land too. This is valuable land. Please don't let them waste it. Holly Nelson Stecklin , Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 5:09 PM To: Steckling. Jean Subject: Fwd'. Prince Galpin Property Comment From: Marcia Mclean <dmclean602@a grmail.com> Date: February 28, 2019 at 12:59:46 PM CST To: aallerna.mchsi.com Subject: Prince Galpin Property Comment Please share my thoughts at Galpin Property meetings. It has been legally accepted that Prince Rogers Nelson left no will. He did, however, leave his thoughts, his views, and his philosophy. One only has to look at his discography and approach the lyrics on literal and figurative levels. One only has to consider his many philanthropic endeavors. One only has to see the devastation he felt upon the loss of his child. Thus, I petition all parties involved to rethink the "Galpin project" in light of what Prince would have wanted. I propose the property be given to the city of Chanhassen to become an extension of the Lake Ann Park, with an Arts Center and a playground for children with disabilities to be developed within its boundaries. Would this be easy to do at this point? No. Consider Prince's famous work ethic and it can be done. He loved Chanhassen. It is time for Chanhassen to show its love for him. To obtain the property and create this adjunct Paisley Park, inclusive, accepting, and where people can play refresh and just be, finding will be required. Create a 501c(3) perhaps? There is no doubt that people from the "Purple Family" around the world, the PRN Alumni Foundation, the People of Paisley Park, the Timberwolves, the Lynx, Travis Smiley, Spike Lee, Oprah Winfrey, Sheila E., his photographers, and countless others will respond either monetarily or in creative and imaginative ways to gather resources. Maybe his heirs will donate a song from the Vault? Prince always went to "The Max". He sang When I go, I go, I go to the Max". Let's all continue and affirm his legacy by doing exactly that "4 him". Thank you. Marcia McLean 110 Stratton Ct. Columbia SC 29210 ag Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Friday, March 01, 2019 8:06 AM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Development plan From: Ron Robey <trapshooter1100@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 6:38 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Development plan I'm in favor of the proposed pud plan to have more green space and protect the lakes Thanks Ron Robey �i Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Friday, March 01, 2019 12:27 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Lennar Galpin subdivision From: Andrew Duneman <andrew@bulkreefsupply.com> Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 12:23 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Lennar Galpin subdivision Kate — I wanted to drop you a quick note supporting the Proposed PUD version of the Galpin Subdivision project. I'm a resident of Greenwood Shores (7050 Redman Lane) just on the other side of Lake Ann. My family and I along with our neighbors love hiking through the woods around Lake Ann year round. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to create a space that all residents of Chanhassen and the surrounding area can enjoy for generations to come. I, along with my neighbors, strongly oppose the Concept Plan which will eliminate this valuable recreational area for good. I attached a few pictures of our kids hiking here this last August. I look forward to attending the meeting on March 5`" to express my support for protecting this priceless area. JO Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Friday, March 01, 2019 12:26 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: I'm in favor of the proposed PUD Plan From: Mike Harding (mharding) <mharding@cisco.com> Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 11:58 AM To: City Council <Council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: I'm in favor of the proposed PUD Plan Kate and Council members— I'm urging you to back the PUD plan. Please help us maintain some community green space and keep our city an outstanding place to live. Mike Harding Mobile: 612-860.5584 mhardino(),cisco.com 31 Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Friday, March 01, 2019 2:12 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: PUD - Lake Ann park space From: Tim Harding <t.h@visi.com> Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 1:59 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: PUD - Lake Ann park space Dear Ms Aanenson, I would like to voice my support for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for the land surrounding Lake Ann. I believe that dedicating the land as park space would the best option for the residents of the City of Chanhassen and Carver County. Thank you for your careful consideration in making this important decision. Sincerely, Tim Harding 3a Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 8:11 AM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Support for PUD plan From: RICHARD MARIETTA MCLEOD <rmktm@msn.com> Sent: Sunday, March 3, 2019 11:04 AM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Support for PUD plan Dear Ms. Aanenson, We are writing to voice our support for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for the land surrounding Lake Ann. We believe that this would be the best long-term option for the City of Chanhassen and Carver County. We have friends who live near Lake Ann, and have enjoyed spending time with them in this natural setting. Thank you for your consideration, Marietta and Rick McLeod 13306 Kipling Ave So Savage MN 55378 952-895-8676 rmktm@msn.com k� February 27, 2019 Mayor Ryan and Council Members: Thank you for seeking public comment regarding the Galpin Boulevard property development. I understand the two proposals and support the change from the Concept Plan to the Proposed PUD with a density transfer. I understand the density transfer results in approximately 41 lots to be transferred to smaller parcels which will allow approximately 45 acres of land to be available for parkland. The density transfer would benefit the wetlands by creating more green space for water runoff, natural filtration and a buffer for the Lake Ann and Lake Lucy s water health. In addition, a community with a strong park system is a more desirable community, a more interactive community and a healthy community. The hard work of Council, Planning Commission, City Staff and Lennar to create this option with a life time benefit is much appreciated. Please approve the density transfer Proposed PUD in order to capture the land for public use and the benefit of Chanhassen's residents.s Sincerely, Solvei and Todd Wilmot 7101 Shawnee Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-470-2360 cc: Chanhassen Planning Commission 3y Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2019 8:05 AM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: In favor of PUD From: Madeline Blommel <maddyb@swbell.net> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 9:57 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: In favor of PUD Hello Kate, I live near Lake Ann and Lake Lucy, and heard about the proposed developments to the area around the lakes. I would like to show support for the Proposed PUD plan. The beautiful area around the two lakes should be open to the community, as a place where they can be active and out in nature. It would mean a lot to me and many of the people I know to have this space as an open park. Thank you for your time, Madeline Blommel 3T Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2019 8:05 AM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: In support of the PUD From: Bryan Blommel <bryan_blommel@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 9:56 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: In support of the PUD Hello, I would like to express my support of the PUD for the Lennar Development for the land west of Lake Ann and Lake Lucy. Don't take the Lake, it can belong to all of us in Chanhassen, not just the few who can afford to buy these lots. Let the park come to be and we will all enjoy it for years to come. Let it be the legacy of this group that allowed this to happen. The PUD with the density transfer is what is best for all of the citizens and visitors of this city. Thank you, Bryan Blommel 3G Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2019 2:09 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Once in a life time opportunity! 100 acres on Ann & Lucy From: Jon Rausch/USA <Jon.Rausch@cushwake.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 2:08 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: FW: Once in a life time opportunity! 100 acres on Ann & Lucy Dear Mayor and City Council Members, I understand that as a result of the work session last night (2/11/19), the Council has requested that the Developer re -present its latest plan to the Planning Commission. Additionally, the City is asking the residents their opinion on the park, for example, residents are being asked " How important is the new park to the residents"? As I understand the project, the Developer is proposing to transfer density from the East side to the West side of the property in order to preserve a large park alone the lake. This is INCREDIBLE! For the sake of the land and our future generations enjoyment of this incredible green space, I would strongly urge you to consider the density transfer, which would result in a 100 acre park. At Camp Tanadoona. we have an internal wetland complex that we eniov (ducks, geese, deer, turkey etc). It's amazing to see such a diverse wildlife on our property. Outdoor experts believe that contact with nature leads to improved mental health, lower stress levels, and enhanced cognitive skills! Please feel free to contact me any time. Again, to be clear — I support the transfer of density to the West side of the site and the preservation of the 100 acres on Lake Ann and Lucy, especially given the alternative of the Developer/Owner pursuing a development plan that would impact the land adjacent to the lake. Which I understand they could do by code. Thank you. All my best, Marnie A Marnie K. Wells Chief Executive Officer Camp Fire Minnesota Direct (612) 284-6816 Main (612) 235 7284 www.camofiremn.org Find us on Facebook & Twitter Light the fire within The information contained in this email (including any attachments) is confidential, may be subject to legal or other professional privilege and contain copyright material, and is intended for use by the named recipient(s) only. Access to or use of this email or its attachments by anyone else is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you may not use, disclose, copy or distribute this email or its attachments (or any part thereof), nor take or omit to take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or email and delete it, and all copies thereof, including all attachments, from your system. Any confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost because this email has been sent to you by mistake. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to reduce the risk of transmitting software viruses, we accept no liability for any loss or damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or unapproved access. 37 Steckling, Jean From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2019 3:24 PM To: Steckling, Jean Subject: FW: Lennar Galpin Boulevard Property Planned Unit Development From: Julie Sorensen <Julie@TeamSorensen.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 3:23 PM To: Ryan, Elise <ERyan@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Sinclair, Jill <jsinclair@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; McDonald, Jerry <JMcDonald@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Tjornhom, Bethany <BTjornhom@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Coleman, Julia <JColeman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Campion, Dan <DCampion@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; AI-jaff, Sharmeen <SAI-Jaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Generous, Bob <bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us>; Walters, MacKenzie <MWalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Lennar Galpin Boulevard Property Planned Unit Development Thankful for Lake Ann Park!!! My husband and I moved to Chanhassen 28 years ago. We actually bought our lot 29 years ago and could not afford to build initially. We were attracted by the natural beauty. We are so thankful the founding fathers of Chanhassen put aside such a wonderful park — Lake Ann. We have picnicked, swam, fished and walked the paths as much as possible over the past 28 years. It has been a gift of tranquility; sun rises, sunsets and quiet moments. So many of Chanhassen's' current residents were attracted by the beauty and green space of Chanhassen. It is a great place to enjoy life and raise a family. We are grateful for the comprehensive plan to make the north shore of Like Ann a park. We feel the City of Chanhassen should not lose this opportunity to preserve this beauty of nature with little to no investment by the citizens of Chanhassen. What Lennar has proposed to have 41 acres added to the park at no cost to the city in exchange for increased density is incredibly generous on their part. Money doesn't grow on trees. The concept that the city purchase the acreage instead of allowing increased density is fiscally irresponsible. That is clearly only for the benefit of adjacent neighbors. If the city were to pursue such a financial transaction, are the neighbors willing to pay for this through a special property tax assessment against their property? I am guessing not. They want to entire city to unnecessarily pay money it doesn't have. If the city does have it, it should be used for other purposes or reduced property taxes in the future. When looking at the density they are complaining about, the complaining neighborhoods aren't any different than the PUD's proposed density. The proposed density is in keeping with the adjoining neighborhoods and property. The parkland version also leaves more trees in place, especially on the north side where those neighbors are complaining about loss of natural buffer. This park version is a gift by Lennar on multiple levels. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth. Even the city purchase instead of density transfer would be fewer trees excluding the park land when comparing the two versions. The park plan minimizes cost to the city and maximizes trees retainage. The Cites logo is a tree leaf. Kind of implies that we value maintaining as much green space as possible especially with mature trees. With the natural buffer at the north side and the 90 foot lots on the south side, the plan completely complements adjacent neighborhoods for consistency. Even the wetland segment benefits from increased tree borders in the park based plan. Again this wouldn't be the case if the city purchased the density where the park is planned. The park plan basically is setup to make it appear the wetland is a part of the park given the tree separation on the west and north perimeters of the wetland. Lennar clearly bent over backwards to maximize parkland and natural areas with their new plan. If city/citizens get to greedy and Lennar walks away, the next developer will not likely be as generous. The other financial downside of the city purchasing the park acreage is reduce property tax basis. So any cost of an estimated $7 to $10 million is a clear misstatement of actual costs to the city. Losing the property tax revenue from those lots in perpetuity is a staggering amount of revenue to the city. With what looks to be roughly 54 lots being taken off the property tax rolls, that is easily at least $200,000/year and likely much more based on size/quality of homes built on the lots. Let's not think only of ourselves or our families, but what we can leave behind. Make Chanhassen a place people want to stay, especially in a fiscally responsible way! Greg and Julie Sorensen CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION U f -PC 19- U 1 Application of U. S. Home Corporation, DBA Lennar, and Comerica Bank and Trust, NA, for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson and Paisley Park Enterprise, Inc. for Rezoning, Preliminary Plat with a Wetland Alteration Permit. On January 15, 2019, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of U. S. Home Corporation, DBA Lennar, and Comerica Bank and Trust, NA, for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson and Paisley Park Enterprise, Inc. for a Rezoning from Rural Residential District, RR, to Planned Unit Development — Residential, PUD -R; Preliminary Plat approval creating 191 lots and three outlots with and approval of a Wetland Alteration Permit to fill and alter wetlands on site. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning, subdivision and wetland alteration permit preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and at the conclusion of the public hearing and discussion by the Planning Commission, McGonagill moved, Tietz seconded that the Planning Commission recommends denial of the rezoning for 191 acres from Rural Residential District (RR) to Planned Unit Development Residential (PUD -R) including PUD ordinance for Galpin Design Standards; the wetland alteration permit and the subdivision preliminary plat creating 191 lots, three outlots and dedication of the right-of-way as shown in plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated December 5, 2018. Commissioners McGonagill, Tietz and Randall voted in favor of the motion for denial. Commissioners Madsen, Weick and Aller voted against the motion for denial. The motion tied with a vote of 3 to 3 and, therefore failed. On March 5, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public comment meeting. No formal action was taken. On March 11, 2019, City Council met and reviewed the proposed development and a revised site plat schematic containing 169 lots. They reviewed the testimony from the Planning Commission. The City Council makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Rural Residential District (RR). 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density (net density 1.2-4.0 units per acre) use. The net density of the PUD is 1.3 units an acre. SCANNED 3. The city's Comprehensive Plan has identified the eastern portion of this site (49 acres) as future park expansion. This development will dedicate these 49 acres as open space. 4. The legal description of the property is: (See Exhibit A) 5. The Zoning Ordinance directs the city to consider six (6) possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) effects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official city Comprehensive Plan since the zoning is consistent with the land use designation of the property, preserves significant areas of natural habitat, trees and vegetation, protects shore land area, utilizes available infrastructure and provides a variety of housing opportunities; b. The proposed use is and will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area, which are residential uses to the west, north and south, an arterial roadway to the west and is buffered from existing single-family homes by distance and landscaping. The subdivision buffers existing development/homes on the north and south by matching or exceeding lots sizes and creating a landscape buffer; c. The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance, subject to the conditions of approval for the subdivision and wetland alteration; d. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed since the use is similar to surrounding uses as well as providing a significant area of permanent open space to be enjoyed by the community, which adds value to all the homes; e. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity since adequate infrastructure is available to the site; and f. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. This subdivision will dedicate the necessary right of way for the upgrade of Galpin Boulevard. 6. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the city to consider seven (7) possible adverse effects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) effects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision complies with the zoning ordinance; In. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's Comprehensive Plan; c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage; f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record, but will provide additional required easements; and 2 g. The proposed subdivision is not premature since it is providing all required infrastructure improvements necessary for residential housing as well as improving existing stormwater issues for adjacent properties. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 7. When approving a Wetland Alteration Permit, the city must determine the capability of a proposed development with existing and proposed uses. The general issuance standards of the conditional use Sec. 20-232, include the following 12 items: a. The proposed development will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. While the development impacts several wetlands, the majority of the wetlands (97 percent) are being preserved and protected. The developer shall mitigate any wetland impacts as well as preserve significant areas of permanent open space for enjoyment by the community. b. The proposed development will be consistent with the objectives of the city's Comprehensive Plan and the subdivision and zoning ordinances. The developer shall meet all water quality standards required of it. c. The proposed residential development will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing and intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. The project proposes the development of single-family homes, which currently exist to the south, west and north of this parcel. d. The proposed development will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. The project proposes single-family homes and a significant public open space. e. The proposed development will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools and will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. The developer shall preserve the easterly outlot as permanent open space. f The proposed development will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community, but will increase the value of the community through the provision of additional housing as well as a significant public open space. g. The proposed development will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash since the use is similar to adjacent uses. h. The proposed development will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. Primary access is provided via full intersections off of a collector street. i. The proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. Wetland impacts will be mitigated. A significant amount of the site will be preserved as permanent open space. j. The proposed development will be aesthetically compatible with the area. The project proposes the development of single-family homes similar to those in the developments to the north, south and west. k. The proposed development will not depreciate surrounding property values. The project proposes the development of residential uses similar to those in the developments to the north, south and west and will increase the value of the community through the provision of additional housing as well as a significant public open space. 1. The proposed development will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in Chapter 20, Articles VI, VII, VIII, XIV - Division 1, =11 and XXIV of the Chanhassen City Code. 8. The Planning Report #2019-01 dated January 15, 2019, updated March 11, 2019, and prepared by Kate Aanenson, et al, is incorporated herein. MOTION The City Council approves the rezoning of the property from Rural Residential District, RR, to Planned Unit Development - Residential, PUD -R; Preliminary Plat approval creating 169 lots and three outlots; and a Wetland Alteration Permit; subject to the amended conditions of the city council staff report dated March 11, 2019 with the addition of a condition requiring the developer construct a minimum eight -space parking lot and that Topaz Drive not be connected to the development. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this I Vh day of March, 2019. BY: 4� J JA— fodd, Gerhardt, City Manager 4 BY: �� 61i� Elise Ryan, MaycY Legal Description: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter comer of said Section 10; thence South along the North- South Quarter line of said Section 10 as distance of 409.69 feet; thence West along a line parallel with the South line of the North Half of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 435.76 feet to the centerline of the Excelsior -Shakopee Road; thence Northeasterly along said centerline a distance of 419.39 feet to the North line of side Section 10; thence East along the North line of said Section 10 to the point of beginning, all according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof. That part of the South half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 23 Carver County, Minnesota lying easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117, also known as Galpin Boulevard, and lying North of the South 186.00 feet of said South half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter thereof. Together with: That part westerly 183.00 feet of each of the following two tracts: (1) That part of the South 186.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5a' Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117 (also known as Galpin Lake Road and formerly known as Chaska and Excelsior Road and as Excelsior and Shakopee Road). (2) That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the P Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117 (also known as Galpin Lake Road and formerly known as Chaska and Excelsior Road and as Excelsior and Shakopee Road). Which lies northerly of lines described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast comer of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 08 seconds West, along the North line of 5 said South half of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 588.71 feet, to the beginning of the lines to be described; thence South 65 degrees 37 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 98.69 feet; thence Northwesterly a distance of 141.37 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 180.00 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, the chord of said curve is 137.77 feet in length and bears North 46 degrees 52 minutes 45 seconds West; thence North 69 degrees 22 minutes 45 seconds West, tangent to said curve a distance of 40.00 feet and said line there terminating. I VI-QO 14 M., -11I i eW,. t. sa v-.., -11-11-i h.m ,,arra., ma..vw�dmdv.o a �m+d.u� CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of U. S. Home Corporation, DBA Lennar, and Comerica Bank and Trust, NA, for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson and Paisley Park Enterprise, Inc. for Rezoning, Preliminary Plat with a Wetland Alteration Permit. On January 15, 2019, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of U. S. Home Corporation, DBA Lennar, and Comerica Bank and Trust, NA, for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson and Paisley Park Enterprise, Inc. for a Rezoning from Rural Residential District, RR, to Planned Unit Development — Residential, PUD -R; Preliminary Plat approval creating 191 lots and three outlots with and approval of a Wetland Alteration Permit to fill and alter wetlands on site. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning, subdivision and wetland alteration permit preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Rural Residential District (RR). 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density (net density 1.2- 4.0 units per acre) use. 3. The legal description of the property is: (See Exhibit A) 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official city Comprehensive Plan since the zoning is consistent with the land use designation of the property, preserves significant areas of natural habitat, trees and vegetation, protects shore land area, utilizes available infrastructure and provides a variety of housing opportunities . b. The proposed use is and will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area, which are residential uses to the west, north and south, an arterial roadway to the west and is buffered from existing single-family homes by distance and landscaping. SC,NW1*D c. The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance, subject to the conditions of approval for the subdivision and wetland alteration. d. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed since the use is similar to surrounding uses as well as providing a significant area of permanent open space to be enjoyed by the community, which adds value to all the homes. e. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity since adequate infrastructure is available to the site. f. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision complies with the zoning ordinance; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city s Comprehensive Plan; C. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage; f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record, but will provide additional required easements; and g. The proposed subdivision is not premature since it is providing all required infiastructure improvements necessary for residential housing as well as improving existing stormwater issues for adjacent properties. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 6. When approving a Wetland Alteration Permit the city must determine the capability of a proposed development with existing and proposed uses. The general issuance standards of the conditional use Sec. 20-232, include the following 12 items: a. The proposed development will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. While the development impacts several wetlands, the majority of the wetlands (97 percent) are being preserved and protected. The developer shall mitigate any wetland impacts as well as preserve significant areas of permanent open space for enjoyment by the community. b. The proposed development will be consistent with the objectives of the city's Comprehensive Plan and the subdivision and zoning ordinances. The developer shall meet all water quality standards required of it. c. The proposed residential development will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing and intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. The project proposes the development of single-family homes, which currently exist to the south, west and north of this parcel. d. The proposed development will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. The project proposes single-family homes and a significant public open space. e. The proposed development will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; and will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. The developer shall preserve the easterly outlot as permanent open space. f. The proposed development will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community, but will increase the value of the community through the provision of additional housing as well as a significant public open space. g. The proposed development will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash since the use is similar to adjacent uses. h. The proposed development will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. Primary access is provided via a full intersections off of a collector street. i. The proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. Wetland impacts will be mitigated. A significant amount of the site will be preserved as permanent open space. j. The proposed development will be aesthetically compatible with the area. The project proposes the development of single-family homes similar to those in the developments to the north, south and west. k. The proposed development will not depreciate surrounding property values. The project proposes the development of residential uses similar to those in the developments to the north, south and west and will increase the value of the community through the provision of additional housing as well as a significant public open space. 1. The proposed development will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in Chapter 20, Articles Vl, VII, VIII, XIV - Division 1, XXIII and XXIV of the Chanhassen City Code. 7. The Planning Report #2019-01 dated January 15, 2019, prepared by Kate Aanenson, et al, is incorporated herein. 91 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the rezoning of the property from Rural Residential District, RR, to Planned Unit Development - Residential, PUD - R; Preliminary Plat approval creating 191 lots and three outlots; and a Wetland Alteration Permit, all subject to the conditions of the staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15t° day of January, 2019. CHANHASSEN PLAbaMLG COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman EXHIBrF A Legal Description Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 89, files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota. That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter comer of said Section 10; thence South along the North- South Quarter line of said Section 10 as distance of 409.69 feet; thence West along a line parallel with the South line of the North Half of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 435.76 feet to the centerline of the Excelsior -Shakopee Road; thence Northeasterly along said centerline a distance of 419.39 feet to the North line of side Section 10; thence East along the North line of said Section 10 to the point of beginning, all according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof That part of the South half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 23 Carver County, Minnesota lying easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117, also known as Galpin Boulevard, and lying North of the South 186.00 feet of said South half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter thereof Together with: That part westerly 183.00 feet of each of the following two tracts: (1) That part of the South 186.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5a' Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117 (also known as Galpin Lake Road and formerly known as Chaska and Excelsior Road and as Excelsior and Shakopee Road). (2) That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 511' Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the centerline of County Road No. 117 (also known as Galpin Lake Road and formerly known as Chaska and Excelsior Road and as Excelsior and Shakopee Road). Which lies northerly of lines described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said South Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 08 seconds West, along the North line of said South half of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 588.71 feet, to the beginning of the lines to be described; thence South 65 degrees 37 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 98.69 feet; thence Northwesterly a distance of 141.37 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 180.00 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, the chord of said curve is 137.77 feet in length and bears North 46 degrees 52 minutes 45 seconds West; thence North 69 degrees 22 minutes 45 seconds West, tangent to said curve a distance of 40.00 feet and said line there terminating. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2019-01 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public notice on Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard. The purpose of this notice is to consider rezoning the parcel from Rural Residential (RR) to Planned Unit Development/Residential District (FUDR); Wetland Alteration Permit; Subdivision of 191 acres including the preservation of approximately 100 acres and the creation of 191 lots located at 7141 Galpin Boulevard. Applicant: US Home Corporation, d/b/a Lennar. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the city's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2019-01 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public notice and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Kate Aanenson, AICP Email: kaanenson(a,ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1139 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on January 3, 2019) gA\plan\2019 plmmmg esus\19-01 galpin site preliminary plat and reaming pud\ph notice to villager -must be sent by 12-26.d= SCANNED 0 0 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) CTPY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNS. N MANNING CASE No. 2019-01 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public notice on Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard. The purpose of this notice is to consider rezoning the parcel from Rural Residential(RR) to Planned Unit Development/Residential District (PUDR); Wetland Alteration Permit; Subdivision of 191 acres including the Preservation of approximately 100 acres and the creation of 191 lots located at 7141 Galpin Boulevard. Applicant: US Home Corporation, d/b/a Lennar. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for Public review on the citys web site at www.ci.chanhassen. mn.us/2019-01 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public notice and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Kate Aanenson, AICP Email: kaanenson@ ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-2271139 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, January 3, 2019: No. 46951 Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. L 9-5' was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: Subscribed and sworn before me on this _,L/ _ day of . 2019 =PUBUC K TA31;23 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $13.62 per column inch RQ Memorandum CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Community for Life- PmvidingforToday and Planning forTomorrow To: Kate Aanenson From: Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer CC. Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer George Bender, Assistant City Engineer Kevin Crooks, Utility Superintendent Date: January 3'd 2019 Re. Galpin Development Subdivision Review City Planning Case No. 2019-01 EASEMENTS & RIGHT-OF-WAY There is an existing 20' wide Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sewer and utility easement located on the property as illustrated on the submitted preliminary plat. Generally, the easement traverses from the northwest corner of the property to the southeast comer of the property, bisecting the site diagonally. The applicant is proposing to impact the easement at two locations. The first location is within the northwest corner of the site where grading and construction of Street "Z" and Basin 200 are proposed. The second location is to the east of Street "G" where grading is proposed behind Lots 143-144. MCES has been supplied the applicant's site plans, and all comments and conditions set forth by MCES shall be addressed by the applicant. An agreement to construct any of the proposed improvements over MCES's easement must be executed and supplied to the City for review prior to the issuance of grading permits. Furthermore, the applicant shall supply callouts identifying the width of the MCES easement on the plat prior to recording. The applicant is proposing standard drainage and utility easements (D&U's) around the majority of the lots on the provided preliminary plat. Additional 20' wide D&U's have been provided within Lots 116-130 abutting Street "Z", Lots 108-111 abutting Street "A", and Lots 102-105 abutting Topaz Drive. These 20' wide D&U's are provided for stormwater collection and conveyance systems located in backyards that fall outside the standard D&U's. Furthermore, 30' wide D&U's between Lots 133-134 abutting Street "H" and Lots 116-117 abutting Street "D" SCANNED PH 952.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is CommunityforUfe-ProvidingforTodayand Planningforbmorrow have been proposed. These additional 30' wide D&U's are provided for access to proposed utilities and the north side of Basin 300. However, 30' wide D&U's between additional lots throughout the development shall be provided in areas requiring access to utilities and stormwater basins. This shall include the location of a water main connection off Street "Z" to a stub off Ruby Lane, discussed under the "Water" section of this staff report, and between lots abutting stormwater Basins 100, 300, and 600. Right-of-way dedication will be required along the east side of Galpin Boulevard per Carver County's review and comments (see "Carver County Development /Access Review Comments" attached), the Highway 117 Corridor Study, and the typical roadway sections identified in the County's Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Corridor Study identifies specific right-of-way needs and the plat will be required to follow and be consistent with the preferred roadway alternative. The right of way shall tie into the existing highway right of way north and south of the proposed development. The preliminary and final plat proposals shall be reviewed and approved as to form and content by the County Surveyor and city. Specific right-of-way dedications and recommended cross-section submittals are referenced in the County's comments under Item 5. Currently there exists overhead utilities within the right-of-way abutting the development on the east side of Galpin Boulevard. The applicant will be required to underground all overhead utilities from W 78th Street to the northern property line. Underground utilities reduce the risk of accidents, such as vehicles colliding with poles and service impacts such as storms knocking down limbs on lines. It also improves the overall esthetics of roadway corridors and neighborhoods, which improves and promotes livability. The undergrounding of utilities from W 78th Street to the southern property line is required to maintain continuity, discourage associated impacts with piecemealed undergrounding activities, and promote constructability. Existing Conditions Survey The provided existing conditions survey does not call out any existing septic systems or water wells. However, Engineering and Public Works are aware of a potential septic system near the "guard house" on the development. The applicant shall determine to the satisfaction of the Engineering and Public Works department that there are in fact no existing septic systems and/or wells located on the property. If found, the abandonment of all existing wells shall be in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health's review and regulations, and the abandonment of all existing septic systems shall be in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's review and regulations. All required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be obtained prior to the commencement of any abandonment(s). There is an existing MCES sanitary and utility easement on parcels 250100400 and 257580040 that is not delineated on the existing conditions survey. The applicant shall identify the PH s52.227.11oo • www ei.chanhassen.mn.us • Fx852.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Community for Life- ProvidingforToday and PlanningforTomorrow document numbers and illustrate the extents of the easement on these parcels and resubmit the existing conditions survey. GRADING The applicant is proposing to construct five stormwater basins (Basins 100, 200, 300, 400, 600) within and around the development. Through the preliminary grading plan and grading details, drainage from individual lots will be routed away from buildings into a series of catch basins and reinforced concrete pipe located within drainage and utility easements in backyards. Drainage from proposed public streets will be collected through catch basins located next to curbs, and routed to stormwater basins within and around the site. The applicant has not provided in the narrative or on the preliminary plans details regarding whether the site will be mass graded or if the site will be graded under a phased approach. The applicant shall supply a mass grading plan or a phased grading plan (whichever is applicable) for review and approval by the city prior to the issuance of grading plans. There are proposed driveways that approach the maximum 10% grade (e.g. Lot 130 abutting Street "Z" is at 9.9% grade) and one street that reaches the maximum 7 % grade (Street "A" near station 24+50) allowed by city ordinance. Staff recommends limiting maximum grades in order to achieve a higher level of constructability. Any constructed street or driveway that exceeds maximum allowable grades upon final inspection will be required to be removed and replaced. The applicant has not supplied top of curb elevations or spot elevations at the center of proposed driveways at curb line on the submitted grading plans. Updated grading plans shall be submitted illustrating these elevations for review by the city to ensure constructability and any potential conflicts. The proposed grading to the north of Street "Z" between stations 6+50 and 11+00 is called out as a 2:1 slope. The slope shall be reduced to 2.5:1, at a minimum, upon submittal of construction drawings and prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Certain locations that call out the emergency overflow route (EOF) are missing the associated drainage arrows. All locations of EOF shall be illustrated with accompanying drainage arrows upon resubmittal of grading plans. There are two bluffs within the site. One bluff is located west of Lots 111-115 abutting Lucy Ridge Lane, and a second bluff is located south of Lots 125-126 abutting Street "Z". The grading plans do not indicate the locations or extent of the bluffs and their appropriate buffers and setbacks. The extent and location of all bluffs shall be provided on the grading plans upon submittal of construction drawings, and the grading and/or building of any structures adjacent to bluffs shall be subject to review and approval prior to the issuance of a grading permit. PH9s2.227moo•www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us• FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing forToday and Planning forTomorrow Proposed grading for Basin 400 encroaches into the southern section of the city's well house #3 and water station site off Galpin Blvd. The applicant will be required to perform site improvements associated with the well house site, discussed under the "Water" section of this staff report, including the relocation of the access driveway off Galpin Blvd. Additionally, there is a significant oak tree that shall be protected during grading operations. The grading plans shall show the relocated access driveway location and grades, the location and footprint of the well house, and call out the protection of the oak tree upon resubmittal of grading plans. There is a low point indicated on the preliminary grading plans at the intersection of Street "E" and Street "H" that does not align with the proposed stone catch basin. The applicant shall adjust the grading plans so that the low point is adjacent to the catch basin for optimal drainage and to reduce ponding or "bird bathing". The preliminary grading plans indicate drainage of backyards from Lots 164-174 abutting Street "A" to runoff directly onto the proposed public trail, north of Wetland 11. The applicant shall submit revised grading plans and stormwater plans so that no stormwater runoff flows directly onto the public trail. Furthermore, no untreated stormwater shall be routed to wetlands prior to treatment. Immediately east of Lot 110 abutting Street "A", the applicant is proposing a stormwater conveyance pipe with catch basins. The preliminary grading plans indicate a grade of approximately 30% running perpendicular to the stormwater system. The applicant shall adjust the grading plans to create a grade of not more than 10% over the utility for maintenance and accessibility purposes. Furthermore, staff has concerns regarding slope stability immediately east of Lot 110. The applicant shall submit an updated geotechnical report, including soil types, ground water elevations, and slope stability calculations for this area based on the proposed structure to be constructed on the lot. The public trail adjacent to the back lot lines of Lots 112-115 has a proposed continuous grade of 8% extending over 150'. While the proposed public trail system meets the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) for maximum running slope of trail segments (no more than 30% of the total trail length to exceed a 1:12 slope), staff recommends the installation of a level resting pad over this continuous grade. This recommendation is based on the intent of ADAAG which is to provide access to the greatest extent possible. The plat's final grading plans, ponds, and right of way along Galpin Boulevard shall be reviewed and approved by the County and the city to show how they conform to the potential future Galpin Boulevard reconstruction. A cross reference of grading plans, profiles, and respective cross sections should be provided at key locations such as intersections, ponds, or other special features for review by the County and city prior to acceptance. M962.227.1100• wwwAchanhasaen.mn.us• FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Comm unity for Life-ProvidingforToday and Plan ningforTomorrow RETAINING WALLS There are three proposed retaining walls on the site. All retaining walls exceeding 4' in height shall be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer or landscape architect and shall be constructed of a durable material (smooth face concretelpoured in place, masonry/mortared, railroad ties and timber are prohibited). No such plans or details were submitted with the plan sheets, and must be provided prior to issuance of grading permits. The retaining wall on the south side of the development behind Lots 108-111 abutting Street "A" is approximately 420' long and ranges from 4'-10' tall. The retaining wall is currently proposed to be offset approximately 10' from a proposed stormwater conveyance line. The retaining wall shall be adjusted to accommodate a 1.5:1 buffer from the bottom of the proposed stormwater line to the bottom of the proposed retaining wall foundation. The 1.5:1 buffer is required for maintenance and repair purposes and to maintain structural stability of the wall during such activities. The retaining wall on the west side of the development behind Lots 161-163 abutting Street "A" is approximately 170' long. Top of wall and bottom of wall spot elevations were not provided. The updated grading plans shall include the top of wall and bottom of wall elevations. The retaining wall on the north side of the development behind Lots 123-125 abutting Street "Z" is approximately 200' long and ranges from 6'-8' tall. The construction of this wall appears to be within a bluff setback. Pending updated grading plans that illustrate the bluff, addressed previously under the "Grading" section of this staff report, the retaining wall may have to be adjusted outside the bluff protection area. STREETS The applicant is proposing the construction of nine new streets (Streets "A" --"H" and Street "Z'j and the extension of two existing streets (Topaz Drive and Lucy Ridge Lane) that shall be owned and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. All newly constructed street sections shall be designed to meet the current standard specifications and detail plates for residential streets. These new streets and extensions will result in six cul-de- sacs with five of the six proposed cul-de-sacs meeting current city code and standard specifications. Street "Z", a newly constructed street and cul-de-sac in the northem section of the development, exceeds the maximum length for a cul-de-sac per city ordinance. City ordinance section 18.57.k limits the length of any cul-de-sac to 800'. Street "Z" is proposed as a cul-de-sac with a length of 1376' measured from the centerline of Galpin Boulevard to the center point of the tumaround radius. However, Engineering recommends approval of the cul-de-sac as the topography would require substantial grading and the loss of significant trees that would alter PH 952.227.1100• www.d.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Community for Life- P=WingforToday and PlanningforTomorrow the physical character of the property and surrounding parcels (Ordinance 18.571.2). Furthermore, public outreach efforts and public hearings were conducted by the city regarding the option for a local through street connecting Galpin Boulevard to Lucy Ridge Lane (i.e. Street "I ). The responses received from residences in the Ashling Meadows neighborhood noted that they opposed the connection. The concerns were regarding; perceived increased cut -through traffic, safety associated with an increase in traffic through residential neighborhoods, and loss of the natural barrier between neighborhoods. The alternative to connect Galpin Boulevard with Lake Lucy Ridge Lane was conceptually proposed back in June of 2018 by the applicant, an exhibit is provided below: Lucy Ridge Rd r. Through Street (Street a Pr tontRANAW iS Concept Plan 07JI 6-1-2018 LQM As the applicant has proposed not to extend or connect the development of the north section through the existing stub off Ruby Lane, the developer shall remove the existing hard surface and construct half street improvements (extending curb & gutter) to maintain the continuity of Topaz Drive. The city will reach out to the property owners abutting the removed stub to discuss vacating the right-of-way, while maintaining utility easements over existing utilities. Access to Street "T' is had from Galpin Boulevard, a collector road. There is an existing driveway 30 feet south of Street "E' providing access to parcel 250100400. This spacing does PH 952.227.1100• WWW.Ci.Chanhanen.II1n.aS• iFX952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Comm unity for Ufa- P=WingforTodayand PlanningforTomotrow not meet MnDOT Access Management Guidelines or Carver County's requirements for access points had off collector roads. The parcel's access from Galpin Boulevard shall be abandoned and realigned to tie into Stmt "Z". Additionally, a water stub for future connection shall be installed to serve the property. The city has had discussions with the resident of this property and has obtained verbal agreeance of such a realignment and future water service connection. The applicant has supplied a geotechnical evaluation report that was completed by Braun Intertec Corporation on June 29, 2018. The report discussed and explored design and construction recommendations for roadway sections, amongst other topics. The report utilized 8 boring locations for the entire site. Due to the size of the development, the city will require additional borings. In-situ soil strata and subsoil conditions over a large area, such as this development (approximately 52 acres), requires a more comprehensive understanding of subsoil constraints that additional borings can provide. The city will require additional borings where roadways are to be constructed and at all cul-de-sac locations. The city will require the applicant to submit an updated geotechnical evaluation report based on the additional borings. Sidewalks and pedestrian access points have been proposed on a majority of the streets throughout the development. However, Street "D", "G" and "Z" will require extensions of sidewalk to provide access within the cul-de-sacs. Sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with city standard specifications and detail plates. Furthermore, there are considerable stretches of sidewalk that do not provide access points or curb ramps to the newly constructed sidewalks. The applicant shall provide curb ramp/access points for every 500 feet of sidewalk. This will result in 3 additional curb ramps/access points from the provided preliminary site plan. All curb ramps shall be constructed to meet ADA standards and the city's detail plates. Sidewalks located at the intersection of Galpin Boulevard & Street "E" and Galpin Boulevard & Street "A" terminate with no proposed intersection improvements to access the existing trail system on the west side. The developer will be required to extend connectivity by providing access from the newly constructed east side to the existing west side of Galpin Boulevard by utilizing approved MUTCD practices for pedestrian crosswalk and intersection improvements. Street lights have been proposed throughout the development. No street light construction detail or specifications were provided with the subdivision submittals. A detail of the street light shall be submitted and reviewed prior to the issuance of building permits. An enumerated list of all street lights and their locations shall be submitted prior to the recording of the final plat. A $300 fee shall be collected with the development contract for each street light for the purpose of electricity costs for the first year of operation. PH 952.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Community for Life. ProvidingforToday and Planning forTomorrow WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER WATER The applicant is proposing to construct 8" PVC C900 water main throughout the development that shall be owned and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. The development is located between two pressure zones in the city; a high pressure zone and a low pressure zone. To the west in the Long Acres neighborhood is a high pressure zone. To the north and south in the Ashling Meadows and Royal Oak Estates neighborhoods, respectively, are low pressure zones. The city has modeled the impact of the development based on the proposed usage. It was found that in order to provide adequate pressures and fire flows, water mains shall be tied into the high pressure zone located on Galpin Boulevard. This will result in some areas of the development experiencing pressures above 90 PSI. Therefore, a portion of the homes will likely require individual pressure reducing valves. In the northwest area of the development where Topaz Drive and Lucy Ridge Lane will be extended, the developer is proposing to tie into the low pressure water system via the existing 8" PVC water mains. Engineering does not anticipate any extraordinary impacts to the water system's pressure or fire flow for the proposed 15 connections. Street "Z" will be tied into the high zone water system via the existing 14" HDPE SDR 11 water main off Galpin Boulevard. Street "Z" is currently proposed as a cul-de-sac, and the applicant is proposing the creation of a dead end system. Public Works will require the applicant to resubmit plans to tie in the proposed water main on Street "Z" to the existing water main stub located off Ruby Lane, to the north. Because Street "Z" will be within the high pressure zone, and the north tie-in location on Ruby Lane (Ashling Meadows neighborhood) is within the low pressure zone, updated construction plans shall call out a gate valve to be installed where the system ties in. This gate valve will remain closed in order to separate the two zones, and will be opened by city forces during any maintenance or repair work in order to "back feed" the system, as necessary. The majority of the water main to be installed is within the central and southern portion of the development (Streets "A -H"). The applicant is proposing to create a looped water system which meets city best management practices for water utilities. Looped systems improve reliability by feeding water from two directions rather than one, which subsequently allows service to continue during an event that may otherwise cause disruption to water service. Water main connections will be tied into the high zone water system off Galpin Boulevard via a 14" HDPE SDR 11 pipe. The applicant shall verify the location of the connections on the construction plans. All water main taps, connections, and required water main testing shall be witnessed by the city. A pre - construction meeting prior to the commencement of any work shall be scheduled by the developer's contractor with the city. Additionally, all underground utilities on the east side of Galpin Boulevard have not been located, for example, the city's raw water main that feeds the PH 952.227.1100 - WWW.c A111111118U I.m11.11S • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Communilyforlife-ProvidingforTodayand PlanningforTomorrow west treatment plant. This area on the east side of Galpin Boulevard is where water and sanitary sewer will cross before entering the development. Thus, prior to the issuance of building permits, all underground utilities in this area shall be surveyed and illustrated in the profile sheets in order to identify any conflicts. The applicant is proposing a "land swap" to build Lot 163 abutting Street "A" within the city's well house #3 property off Galpin Boulevard. This exchange of land will require the execution of an agreement to be reviewed and approved by the city prior to acceptance and recording of the final plat. The agreement will set forth conditions for improvements to the well house #3 site in exchange for the land required for Lot 163. The improvements will be: the relocation of the ingress/egress driveway to well house #3 due to vertical curve and sight distance hazards, relocation of the SCADA antenna due to the impact of Lot 163, improvements to the hard surface area surrounding the well house which shall include a turning movements analysis to ensure proper widths for design vehicles are adequate, and potential landscaping improvements. Furthermore, the applicant must maintain a 50 foot setback of all structures from well house #3 in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health requirements. From the proposed preliminary water plans, there are multiple areas where water main and sanitary sewer mains will cross. All crossings of water and sewer utility mains are required to have 18" of vertical separation and 10' of horizontal separation, measured from the edge of pipe. Additionally, where water mains cross sanitary sewer mains, the sanitary sewer shall be constructed of C900 water main material and the sanitary sewer pipe length shall be centered over the water main crossing. The preliminary plans delineate areas where water main will run closely adjacent to, or under, stormwater catch basins. This may cause a potential for freezing of the water main at these locations due to inadequate ground cover from catch basin bottoms (sumps) to the water main. Water mains shall be constructed at 7.5' below grade, or insulated, and constructed in conformance with the city's standard specifications and detail plates. Plan and profile sheets provided with the construction drawings of the water main shall include the location and depth of catch basins and their sumps for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The location of gate valves at some locations are up to 40' away from tees. The applicant shall cluster all valves at tees to obtain a minimum of 5' spacing from the tee to the valves, where feasible. Review of valve locations and other water main appurtenances shall be conducted by Public Works and Engineering prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant shall ensure all fire hydrant spacing meets fire codes and are subject to the review and approval of the Fire Department. PH 952.227.1100 • MIIYMIAchanhaummn.us • FX 952.227.11111 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Comm unity for Life - Providing forToday and Planning forTomorrow SANITARY SEWER The applicant is proposing to construct 8" PVC sanitary sewer main throughout the development that shall be owned and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. The entire sanitary sewer system will operate as a gravity system and connects to existing sanitary sewer mains at five locations; Lucy Ridge Lane, Topaz Drive, the intersection of Galpin Blvd and Hunter Drive, a direct connection to the MCES sanitary sewer trunk line on Street "Z", and at the Majestic Way extension off Street "D" through a utility easement. As proposed, the connection to the MCES sanitary sewer trunk line from Street "Z" and its subsequent manhole are not within the roadway, down steep grades, and abutting Basin 200. The applicant shall resubmit construction drawings to provide the access manhole and tie-in on and within Street "Z". All conditions set forth by MCES shall be addressed by the applicant for the required access manhole and direct connection to their trunk line, and all permits required shall be obtained prior to the commencement of construction. The sanitary sewer line to the south, adjacent to Lots 10 1- 109 abutting Street "A", are proposed to be constructed at the minimum slope for gravity systems based on 10 States Standards (0.4% for 8" PVC pipe). It is the recommendation of the engineering department to increase the slope to a minimum of 2% for a more effective cleaning velocity. This approach is feasible as the proposed manhole depths are 12-22 feet (e.g. MH -92) from top of lid to invert -outs. Also, the tie-in of this sewer line is to a manhole at the intersection of Galpin Boulevard and Hunter Drive. From the proposed preliminary plans the applicant is proposing a new manhole, while city records show an existing manhole directly adjacent to the proposed new manhole. The applicant shall field verify this connection and its configuration prior to the submittal of construction plans. The preliminary plans submitted utilize a nomenclature for identifying proposed manholes that differs from the city's. Prior to the submittal of construction drawings the applicant shall ensure the city's manhole naming conventions are incorporated within the plans. The city will provide a list of appropriate manhole identifiers. This will ensure an efficient transition of the newly constructed public improvements into the city's asset management system for sanitary sewer appurtenances. Although not required, profile sheets for the sanitary sewer system were not provided. However, based on the provided plan sheets the applicant is proposing sanitary sewer that reaches a maximum depth of 26.47' (see MH -26 in front of Lot 172 abutting Street "A"). PVC sanitary sewer pipes that have a burial depth of 0-16 feet are required to be class SDR 35, burial depths of 16-26 feet requires class SDR 26, and burial depths of greater than 26 feet requires class C900. The applicant shall update construction drawings indicating sanitary sewer pipes that fall within PH 952.227.noo • www ol.chanhassmmn.us • FX 852.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Comm unity for Life - ProvidingforToday and Planning forTomorrow these burial depths to have the appropriate class of PVC. Furthermore, all inverts that have a 20 inch or greater differential shall be supplied inside drops per city standards and be constructed per the city's detail plate for inside drops. The preliminary plans show one manhole (MH -99 in front of Lot 118 abutting Street "C") having sewer flows in opposing directions, i.e. the east "invert out" flows to the east, and the west "invert -out" flows to the west. The applicant shall submit construction drawings that isolate flow directions via separate manholes and independent pipe systems. Storm Water Utility Connection Charges Section 4-30 of city code sets out the fees associated with surface water management. A water quality and water quantity fee are collected with a subdivision. These fees are based on land use type and are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the degradation of surface water. This fee will be applied to the new lot of record being created. It is calculated as shown in the table below: SURFACEWATER DEVELOPMENT FEE AREA PERACREFEE I ACRES IFEE GROSSAREA $8,320 191.0465 IS 1,589,506.88 ROW $8,320 16.79 $ 139,692.80 ourLOTS $8,320 122.3114 $ (1,017,630.85 NEC AREA 51.9451 $ 432 183.23 The SWMP Fee is $432,183.23, pending any plan revisions. ASSESSMENTS Water and sewer partial hookups are due at the time of final plat. The partial hookup fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time. The remaining partial hookups fees are due with the building permit. FEES Based on the proposal the following fees would be collected with the development contract: a) Administration Fee: if the improvement costs are between $500,000 and $1,000,000, 2% of the improvement costs. If the improvement costs exceed $1,000,000, 2.5% of the first $1,000,000 plus 1.5% of the remainder. b) Surface water management fee: $432,183.23 c) A portion of the water hook-up charge: $2,311/unit d) A portion of the sanitary sewer hook-up charge: $691/unit PH 952.227.iioo • www.ci.chanhassett.lnn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Comm unkyfor Life- Providing forToday and Planning forTomorrow e) GIS fees: $25 for the plat plus $10 per parcel f) Street light operating fee for one year: $300 per light CONDITIONS 1. Any requirements set by MCES to work within MCES's sewer and utility easement shall be addressed by the applicant. 2. An executed agreement between the developer and MCES allowing work within MCES's easement shall be provided to the city prior to the issuance of grading permits. 3. The width of the MCES sewer and utility easement shall be called -out on the final plat prior to acceptance and recording. 4. The width of the public right-of-ways shall be called out on the final plat prior to acceptance and recording, this includes radii cul-de-sacs bulbs. 5. 30' wide drainage and utility easements, for the purpose of accessing utilities and basins, shall be provided between, but not limited to; Lots 109 & 110 abutting the cul-de-sac of Lucy Ridge Lane & Topaz Drive, Lots 152 & 153 abutting Street "E", Lots 119 and 120 abutting Street "D", in the area of Lots 128 and 130 abutting Street "Z" where the water main loop is to be installed, and Lots 120 and 121 abutting Street "Z", prior to acceptance and recording. 6. Right-of-way dedication in conformance with the attached Carver County Development / Access Review Comments, subject to review and approval by the County and city prior to acceptance and recording of the final plat. 7. On-going coordination with the County and city regarding future improvements to Galpin Boulevard. Also see condition 25. 8. The developer shall underground all overhead utilities from W 78b Street to the northern properly line of the development. 9. The developer shall locate on the existing condition survey all existing wells and septic fields. 10. The developer shall abandon all existing wells and septic fields in accordance with all federal, state and local regulatory agencies' standards, and obtain all necessary permits for said abandonments. Prior to commencement of abandonment activities, a copy of all required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the city. 11. Provide an updated existing condition survey that illustrates the MCES sanitary and utility easements on parcels 250100400 and 257580040. 1 e applicant shall submit a mass grading plan or a phased grading plan (as applicable) r review and approval by the city prior to issuance of grading permits. 13. oposed spot elevations shall be shown on the grading plans at the center of the roposed driveway at the curbline for review prior to issuance of grading permits. Proposed spot elevations shall be shown on the grading plans at top of curb for review prior to issuance of grading permits. PH W2.227.1ioo • www.ci.chanhasm.nln.us • Fx 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Comm unity for Ufe- Providing forToday and Planning forTomorrow 15. Slopes north of Street "Z" called out as 2:1 between stations 6+50 and 11+00 shall be adjusted to achieve a minimum slope of 2.5:1. 16. Drainage arrows for all EOF routes shall be included on the grading plans prior to issuance of grading permits. 17. Grading plans shall be updated to include bluff extents and setbacks. Grading within bluff setbacks is subject to review and approval by the city prior to issuance of grading permits. 18. All existing buildings and structures within the city's well house #3 property abutting Galpin Blvd. shall be included on the grading plans. 19. Grading plans shall be updated to include the location and grade of the improved and relocated access driveway to well house #3 off Galpin Boulevard. 20. Grading plans shall be updated to include the location and protection methodology of the significant oak tree on the well house #3 site. 21. The low point south of the catch basin (CBMH-306) near the intersection of Street "E" and Street "H" shall be adjusted to be adjacent to the catch basin. 22. The applicant shall submit revised grading plans and stormwater plans so that no stormwater runoff flows directly onto the public trail south of Lots 164174 abutting Street "A". 23. Slopes shall not exceed 10% immediately to the east of Lot 110 abutting Street "A" where stormwater conveyance systems are proposed. 24. An updated geotechnical report assessing slope stability immediately east of Lot 110 abutting Street "A" shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 25. Final grading plans, including pond locations, sizing and analysis, along with right-of- way dedications off Galpin Boulevard, shall conform to the future Galpin Boulevard reconstruction project. Cross reference of grading plans, profiles, and respective cross sections are to be provided at key locations such as intersections, ponds, or other special features required by the County and city for review prior to acceptance and recording of the final plat. 26. All retaining walls exceeding 4' in height shall have plans and details prepared by a registered engineer or landscape architect prior to issuance of building permits. 27. The retaining wall south of Lots 108-111 abutting Street "A" shall be adjusted to accommodate a 1.5:1 buffer from the bottom of the proposed stormwater line to the bottom of the proposed retaining wall foundation. 28. Spot elevations of top of wall and bottom of wall for the retaining wall behind Lots 161- 163 abutting Street "A" shall be included on the grading plans. 29. Grading and construction within bluff setbacks are subject to review and approval by the city prior to issuance of grading permits. This includes, but is not limited to, the retaining wall located south of Lots 123-125 abutting Street "Z". PH 952.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Comm unity for Life- ProvidingforToday and Planning forTomorrow 30. All newly constructed streets, and the extension of any existing streets, shall be public streets, owned and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 31. All newly constructed public streets shall be designed to meet the current standard specifications and detail plate for residential streets (plate #5200), unless otherwise directed by the City Engineer. 32. Any and all conditions associated with the alignment and configuration of Street "Z" set by the Planning Commission or City Council shall be addressed by the applicant prior to acceptance and recording of the final plat. 33. The applicant shall remove all impervious surface from the existing Ruby Lane stub -out, construct half street improvements (extending curb & gutter) on Topaz Drive, and restore the area to the surrounding conditions. 34. The existing driveway off Galpin Blvd. located on parcel 250100400 shall be abandoned and tied into Street "Z". 35. A water service lateral shall be stubbed off Street "Z"'s watermain for the future connection to parcel 250100400. 36. An updated geotechnical report with additional soil borings shall be provided for review and approval prior to the commencement of construction. 37. Sidewalks shall be extended along the cul-de-sacs located off Street "D", "G", and "Z" and shall be constructed in accordance with the city's standard specifications and detail plates for concrete sidewalks. 38. The applicant shall install curb ramps for pedestrian access to stretches of sidewalk greater than 500' between intersections and/or proposed curb ramps. 39. All curb ramps shall be constructed to meet ADA standards and the city's detail plates #5215-5215D. 40. Intersection improvements to provide pedestrian access at the intersections of Galpin Boulevard & Street "E" and Galpin Boulevard and Street "A" shall be constructed in accordance with MUTCD best management practices. 41. A detail of the proposed street lights shall be provided prior to the issuance of building permits. 42. An enumerated list of all street lights and their proposed locations shall be provided for review and approval prior to the recording of the final plat. 43. The site plan shall be updated to provide proposed street grades (centerline gradients). 44. All newly constructed water mains shall be public water mains, owned and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 45. Water mains located on Streets "A" --"H" and Street "Z" shall be tied into the high pressure zone located on Galpin Boulevard. Water main extensions on Topaz Drive and Lucy Ridge Lane shall be tied into the existing water main stubs (low pressure zone). 46. The water main located on Street "Z" shall be tied into the existing stub off Ruby Lane and a gate valve near the connection point shall be installed. The gate valve shall be closed to separate the pressure zones. m i 9s2.227aloo • www.ci.chanhasm.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Comm unity for Life- Providing forToday and Planning forTomorrow 47. The developer shall field verify the location of all water main taps prior to the issuance of building permits and update the plans accordingly. 48. The developer's contractor shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with Engineering and Public Works Utilities prior to the commencement of any work to the water main installation and tapping. 49. Updated plans indicating the location of all underground utilities on the east side of Galpin Boulevard, along with plan and profiles of any utility crossings on the east side of Galpin Boulevard, shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 50. An agreement that lists the conditions and required improvements for the land swap between the developer and the city regarding Lot 163 and a portion of the well house #3 site shall be executed and recorded prior to the acceptance and recording of the final plat. 51. All utility crossings of potable water and sanitary and/or storm mains will require 18" of vertical separation and 10' of horizontal separation. The developer shall submit construction plans with profiles and plan views of the utilities for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 52. All utility crossings of potable water and sanitary sewer will require that the sanitary sewer main at that crossing be constructed of PVC C900 water main material. The developer shall submit construction plans indicating material type at these locations for review and approval of the city prior to issuance of building permits. 53. The developer shall submit construction plans indicating that pipe lengths of sanitary sewer mains are centered over potable water crossings. 54. Water mains shall be constructed at 7.5' below grade, or insulated, and constructed in conformance with the city's standard specifications and detail plates. 55. Cluster valves located around water main tees shall be installed at a minimum of 5' from the tees to the valves, where feasible. All valve locations and any other water main appurtenances shall be reviewed and approved by Engineering and Public Works prior to the issuance of building permits. 56. All comments and conditions regarding fire appurtenances, spacing, and location set forth by the Fire Department shall be addressed by the applicant. 57. All newly constructed sewer mains shall be public sewer mains, owned and maintained by the city after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 58. All conditions set forth by MCES for the direct connection and installation of an access manhole to their trunk line shall be addressed by the applicant, and all permits required for the connection and installation of the manhole shall be obtained prior to the commencement of construction. 59. The applicant shall field verify the proposed sanitary sewer connection and existing sewer system configuration at the intersection of Galpin Boulevard and Hunter Drive prior to the submittal of construction plans. 60. The applicant shall ensure the city's sanitary sewer nomenclature is incorporated in the construction plans. PH 952.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Comm unkyfot Ufa -P=WingforToday and Planning forTomorrow 61. PVC sanitary sewer pipes that will be constructed at a burial depth of 0-16 feet shall be constructed of pipe class SDR 35, burial depths of 16-26 feet shall be of pipe class SDR 26, and burial depths of greater than 26 feet shall be of pipe class C900. 62. Inverts that have a 20 inch or greater differential shall be supplied inside drops per city standards and be constructed per the city's detail plate #2104. 63. The applicant shall submit construction drawings that isolate flow directions via separate manholes and independent pipe systems. PH 952.227.1100. wwwAchanhamn.mn.u5 • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on January 3, 2019, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing to consider rezoning parcel from Rural Residential (RR) to Planned Unit Development/Residential District (FUDR), Wetland Alteration Permit, and Subdivision of 191 acres including the preservation of approximately 100 acres and the creation of 191 lots, Planning Case File No. 2019-01 to the persons named on attached Exhibit 'W', by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Kim . Meuwissen, De -C ler Subscribed ands om to before me thiS3 4 day of�!fa12019. Public This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03. Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnity, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrent that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. «TAX_N AM E» «TAX_ADD_1-1u ((TAX ADD L2)>,«TAX ADD L3» ((Next RecordvaTAX_NAMEx, ((TAX -ADD -L1>) ((TAX_ADD_L2)),((TAX_ADD_L3)) Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start ' until later in the evening,depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Boulevard Consider rezoning parcel from Rural Residential (RR) to Planned Unit Development/Residential District (PUDR); Proposal: Wetland Alteration Permit; Subdivision of 191 acres including the preservation of approximately 100 acres and the creation of 191 lots. Applicant: US Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar Property 7141 Galpin Boulevard Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What public hearing through the following steps: Happens at 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2019-01. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson by Questions & email at kaanensonaci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1139. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project website listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.usinotifyme to sign u 1 City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within at least S00 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in exiling. Any interested party is invited to a%end the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation Rezonings land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote M the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to oe processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standartl. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to Complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonlrepresentative is encouraged to provitle a contact for the City. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested personis). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any wrcesp an. regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council, %you wish to have something to be indutletl in the report please contact the Planning staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start ' until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Boulevard Consider rezoning parcel from Rural Residential (RR) to Planned Unit Development/Residential District (PUDR); Proposal: Wetland Alteration Permit; Subdivision of 191 acres including the preservation of approximately 100 acres and the creation of 191 lots. Applicant: US Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar Property 7141 Galpin Boulevard Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2019-01. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson by Questions & email at kaanenson(&ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1139. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project website listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and interim uses. Wetlantl Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before Me Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within at least 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in wiling Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except re tmings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standartl. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to Complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonfrepresentalive is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any Correspondence regarding the application will W included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the rads lease contact the Planning staff person named on the notification. TAX -NAME TAX -ADD -Ll TAX -ADD -L2 TAX -ADD -L3 ALLAN R & MARY OLSON 7461 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9366 ANDREW WERNER 2241 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANGELO 1 & CARA L GALIOTO 1805 EMERALD LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7596 ASHLING MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS 16305 36TH AVE N SUITE 600 PLYMOUTH MN 55446-4270 ASHLING MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS 16305 36TH AVE N SUITE 600 PLYMOUTH MN 55446-4270 BARRY G & JENNIFER 1 FRIENDS PO BOX 396 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-0396 BLAKE M & TAMI C GOTTSCHALK 2197 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9355 BRADLEY G & ALISA L LACOMY 7301 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRIAN J & BARBARA A KNUDSON 7312 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRIAN L LAROCHE 1880 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7662 BRIAN M LARAMY 7471 TULIP CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9330 CARVER COUNTY 602 4TH ST E CHASKA MN 55318-2102 CHARLES E LOEFFLER II 7327 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHARLES PETERSON 7496 CROCUS CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9351 CHERREE R THEISEN 2072 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9352 DAGMAR DIETHELM REV INTER TRUST 2085 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9356 DAKE N & DEIRDRA CHATFIELD 2200 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9354 DARYOUSH GOLBAN 2232 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID A EICKMEYER REV TRUST 7339 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID D KOESTER 7290 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID G & MAUREEN NELSON 6885 SAPPHIRE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7591 DAVID K WEIBY 2149 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9355 DAVID KOELLN 2133 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9355 DAVID SENIOR 7431 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9366 DOUGLAS 1 AHRENS 4011 E VALLEY RD WAYZATA MN 55391-3667 ECKANKAR PO BOX 2000 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-2000 ELIZABETH BARNES 2179 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ERIC S & LISA M HAMBORG 1861 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7662 GERARD W MAHER 7101 UTICA LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9528 GREGORY BLAUFUSS 7116 UTICA LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9528 GREGORY R STEWART 1893 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317- HSIN-HUNG HUANG 2045 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9356 HUGH REVOCABLE TRUST 7441 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9366 JAMES A & LESA W BOETTCHER 7476 CROCUS CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9351 JAMES A FREEBERSYSER 6935 RUBY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7595 JAMES W & CYNTHIA A ROSENDAHL 7090 TECUMSEH LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8330 JAY R & ANN MARIE GERCZAK 1941 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 JEFFREYJ & STACEY MORKEN 6945 RUBY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7595 JEFFREY S & CRISTIN L MASCHKA 2086 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9352 JEROLD R CLAIR 7460 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9362 JOAN E WEIS 2101 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9355 JOCELYN 1 O'BRIEN 2198 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9359 JODI LV LANNOM INTERVIVOS REV TRUST 6920 RUBY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7595 JOEL W & SUSAN M REIMERS 7495 CROCUS CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9351 JOHN C & CARRIE M TIETZ LIV TRUSTS 7011 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8026 JOHN D & CAROL A P PITZ 2117 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9355 JOHN E ELVECROG 7411 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8430 JON & MARY BETH HEBEISEN 1T REV TRST 2150 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9353 JOSE L MARRUJO 1973 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 JOSHUA KIMBER 2060 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9352 KARL D & DIANNE M DEAN 2251 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KENNETH LEER 2181 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9355 KEVIN J SUNDEM 1845 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7662 LAKE LUCY RDG HOMEOWNERS ASSN 8315 PLEASANT VIEW DR MOUNDS VIEW MN 55112-6139 LARRY & YOKO N STUEVE 7324 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LE THU CA 7319 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LEOTA M HALES 7451 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9366 LONGACRES HOMEOWNERS ASSN INC PO BOX 542 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LONGACRES HOMEOWNERS ASSN INC PO BOX 542 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK E & JULI A GEMPLER 1877 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7662 MARK R & TANYA L ERICKSON 2216 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK S & GERI S RADKE 1989 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 MARK SEEFELDT 7470 TULIP CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9330 MARTIN ZIELINSKI REV TRUST 2211 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MATTHEW & MICHELLE N MYERS 7421 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9366 MATTHEW RAU 6925 RUBY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7595 MAURICIO FERREIRA DE GOES 6930 RUBY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7595 MEHDI AYOUCHE 2102 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9353 MICHAEL D & JANE E FELMLEE 7336 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL J GORRA PO BOX 9798 FARGO ND 58106 - MICHAEL L & KRESSIN B KRAUSE TRUSTS 7050 UTICA LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9214 MICHAEL WESCHE 7475 CROCUS CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9351 NATHAN DEKAM 2231 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAISLEY PARK ENTERPRISES INC PO BOX 8265 WICHITA FALLS TX 76307-8265 PATRICK DOUGLAS SIMMONS 7055 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL A & AMY C HOLLIS 2221 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL A SJOGREN 7490 TULIP CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9330 PAUL D JOHNSON 2174 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9353 PAUL 1 & LYNNETTE A OLSON 2189 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL M ENGEBRETSON 7050 TECUMSEH LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8330 PETER 1 & LYNN M POLINGO 1981 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 PRINCE R NELSON PO BOX 8265 WICHITA FALLS TX 76307-8265 RICHARD A SIT 1957 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 ROBERTJ RAIALINGAM 1909 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 ROBERT LESTER SHEEHAN 2199 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROGER J & SALLY A HAMM 2180 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9359 ROSE -MARIE J ANDERSON 7210 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 - SCOTT E & TAMARA G SATHER 7090 UTICA LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9214 SENGTAVANH B & MARIO S MEAS 7440 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9362 SHANE D WASKEY 1925 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 SHAWN YOU 7263 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEPHEN M & RENEE L PAWLYSITYN 7266 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEPHEN M BARNES 7100 UTICA LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9528 STEVEN P WALLACE 6900 LUCY RIDGE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7599 STUART REID 7423 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8430 SUSAN M LOMBARDO REV TRUST 7278 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS F & NANCY L HAUSER 1920 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 THOMAS P & ANGELA D VUKOVICH 1965 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 TIMOTHY C STEWART 7287 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TIMOTHY NORDBERG 2126 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9353 TODD M & KAREN T BIMBERG 7275 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TODD M SIMNING TODD N & ANNE B JUTTING TRENT MAHR TREVOR A ST JOHN TYLER N TREAT WILLIAM H THOMPSON WILLIAM K & KRISTINE GUGGEMOS 2145 WYNSONG LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4841 7311 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 2065 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9356 1900 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 2148 WYNSONG LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4841 7491 TULIP CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9330 2165 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9355 2 r, Memorandum To: Paul Oehme, PE From: Jeff Sandberg, PE, WSB Kendra Fallon, EIT, WSB Date: January 2, 2019 Re: Galpin Development Initial Stormwater Review WSB Project No. 013315-000 The following documents were submitted by Pioneer Engineering in early December 2018 and were reviewed against the City of Chanhassen (City) requirements: • 01-118100-Proposed-(11-20-2018).p8c • 01-118100-Proposed-(11-20-2018)(1).p8c • 116037 -Atlas 14 -MN 24 -hr S0; undated • 116037 -Atlas 14 -MN; undated • Final Galpin Feasibility Report (PW176a); dated August 2018 • Galpin Existing 11-20-18 • Galpin Proposed 11-20-18 • Galpin Site Preliminary Plat and PUD —1st Submittal 12-05-2018 • Lennar Galpin Blvd Tree List; undated • MNR Galpin Blvd MnRAM Memo 7-23-18 • RPBCWDSnowmelt_10d_100yr; undated • Stormwater Report 11-07-18 • Wetland Delineation Report—updated; dated September 27, 2017 The comments are only preliminary comments and do not constitute a full review of the submitted materials. Additional comments may be generated as a full review is conducted. General 1. Wetland permitting is required due to the proximity and proposed impacts to wetlands onsite. A wetland permit apglic tion has not yet bee ceiyed by the City from the applicant.„� 2. Wetland review will include ensuring hydrology is maintained to all wetlands to be preserved as well as review of proposed stormwater impacts. 3. Storm sewer sizing calculations should be provided to confirm storm sewer is sized to convey the 10 -year storm event. 4. An NPDES permit and accompanying storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) will be required prior to the start of construction. 5. An operations and maintenance plan for the proposed stormwater management system will be required prior to approval. 6. Provide infiltration test results per MPCA Requirements in the location of each proposed infiltration area. 4 FNr wh'e/x 4�M� (ane Kt0133150001F.-T.Uw.� 1331S000G Iqn pevelopmenthbMSta teaABx.010218tl SCANNED Galpin Development Initial Stormwater Review January 2, 2019 Page 2 Preliminary Plans 1. Show all existing storm sewer and other water resource related features in plans. 2. Adjust and show all easements over the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' sanitary sewer on the preliminary and final plat. 3. Clearly indicate what storm sewer will be private and what will be public. All public storm sewer will be required to be shown in profile view. Applicant should confirm there are no conflicts with the watermain or sanitary sewer throughout the site. 4. The following comments pertain to all proposed ponds that include an infiltration bench (Basins 100, 200 and 300): a. Infiltration test results will be required in the location of all proposed infiltration benches and infiltration basins. Infiltration test results have not been submitted in the location of proposed Basin 100. If filtration is to be used, the applicant will need to provide a specification for amended soils. b. The exfiltration above the piped outlet elevation should be included in the HydroCAD model and the exfiltration rate should correspond to what is presented in the infiltration test results. C. The proposed infiltration benches will be required to meet the 48-hour drawdown requirement. d. Outlets from the pond should be moved out of the permanent pond area and should be moved away from the inlet to minimize the risk of short circuiting. 5. The proposed piped outlet being modeled for Basin 400 is not shown in the plans. 6. Access routes for all proposed stormwater basins are required for maintenance purposes. Applicant should callout access locations for all proposed stormwater basins. 7. A defined riprap EOF spillway will be required for all stormwater basins per details provided on Sheet 33. Applicant should include location and elevation of all EOF spillways on the storm sewer plans. HydroCAD Model 1. The soil borings provided show that there are clay soils throughout the site. Modeling should be updated to reflect the D soils present. 2. Proposed and existing HydroCA Jf models-sho-uM be modeling the same area. There is roughly 120 acres included in the existing conditions model that is not included in the proposed conditions model. All offsite drainage should be included in the models. 3. Existing and proposed conditions drainage area maps should be updated to show the location and boundaries of all subcatchments included in the models. 4. Time of concentrations should be calculated in HydroCAD and not directly entered to confirm accuracy. Provide supportin,�culations for all directly entered times of concentrations. 11 5. From the drainage area maps, it ap�earsl LU 2-6 (P. E. Edit the existing model corresponds to Pond 500P in the proposed conditions mo a modeled storage for the wetland differs between the existing and proposed conditions models but no wetland impacts are shown on Sheet 37 for this wetland. Applicant should update the models so that they have the same storage modeled for the wetland. a. There is a proposed piped outlet from this wetland that is over 4 feet lower than the current natural spillway outlet. The applicant will be required to show that this does not change the hydrology of the existing wetland as part of the wetland permit requirements. 6. There are numerous inconsistencies between what is shown in the plans o h&,ng r the outlets of the stormwater basins and what is being modeled in HydroCA aApplicant will need to update the models so that they are representative of shown in the plans. K'W13315-000TF-TO\DaleV33l5 Gelpn Development IMM Staneveter ReWM01NI8.o Galpin Development Initial Stormwater Review January 2, 2019 Page 3 P8 Model 1. The same total area should be modeled in P8 as in HydroCAD. 2. The model should be run for at least 50 years and should include the most recent precipitation data included in the precipita to get accurate removal efficiencies. 3. The modeling of the proposed stormwater ponds with filtration benches is incorrect and is overestimating the removal efficiencies of the basins. The applicant should update the mo for the stormwater basins in the following way: a. The design infiltration rate should be added to the flood pool section of the stormwater pond devices where applicable. This will model infiltration above the outlet elevation. The design infiltration rate should match what is being modeled in HydroCAD. b. The infiltration basins should be removed from the model (except for Device 600i). Applicant should confirm total phosphorus and total suspended solids removal requirements are still being met after the model has been updated. 4. Watersheds 201 and 600 are only modelin he impervious area. The pervious area in these watersheds should be adde a model. 5. Watershed 300 in the 8 as 5 impervious while the corresponding HydroCAD subwatershed has 50 mpervious odeled. Applicant should update the models to be consistent with on other and representative of the plans. Stormwater Management Plan 1. The total areas listed in the table in Section III.A of the Stormwater Management Plan are inconsistent with the total areaedc6lti the plans and the total area being modeled. A nc u e a en Ire sl a In e a le. We request that the applicant respond by restating each comment and stating how each comment was addressed. Please reach out with any questions. K 101331 S0 Tmm-ToOalaZ13315.000 G Ipn Development Intel$tonnwater Review 010218.0 Carver County Public Works 11360 Highway 212, Suite 1 Cologne, M N 55322 December 28, 2018 City of Chanhassen, c/o Paul Oehme, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer 952-227-1169 poehme(a)ci.chanhassen. mn. us Re: Development / Access Review Comments: Nelson Property Preliminary Plat on CR 117/Galpin Blvd. Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject development in the City of Chanhassen. Consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan and County Codes, the following are comments and recommended conditions of approval and as potential requirements for any necessary permits to be issued for the project: The subject plat and development has been reviewed against several other major planning and infrastructure projects, with the result that several changes and/or cross-checks of the subject plat will be required. CR 117/Galpin Blvd. is planned as turn back project and studied as part of a Highway 117 Corridor Study. Galpin Blvd is also identified in the County's Comprehensive Plan as an Urban/Urbanizing Collector, with a guided access spacing of 1/4 - mile full access and 1/8 -mile secondary access. In addition, a draft master stormwater and pond management was developed, based on planned development and road design elements. 2. In terms of access management, the proposed accesses across from Hunter Dr. and Longacres Dr. meet the guideline for full access. These two access points are also identified in the Highway 117 Corridor Study for full access. 3. In terms of access management, the access across from Wynsong Ln. meets the 1/8 spacing guideline for a secondary access. Note that this access could be restricted to a right-in/right- out access in the future. As such, it is recommended the City and developer consider a local through road connection instead of the proposed cul-de-sac. As a condition of the secondary access across from Wynsong Ln, the driveway from parcel no. 250100400 will need to be removed from CR 117/Galpin Blvd. and connect to the proposed new local road. Exclusive left turn and right turn lanes should be required at all full access points across from Hunter Dr. and Longacres Dr., and if full access allowed at Wynsong Ln. Left turn lanes are preferred over right turn lanes if space is a premium. These are shown conceptually in the preferred alternative from the Highway 117 Corridor Study. The Hunter Drive location looks like it will need additional right of way and / or special design transitions to the south to fit the recommended turn lane lengths and transition tapers. SC,r-.t+�Eo 5. Right of way dedication will be required along the east side of CR 117/Galpin Blvd. per the above considerations, the Highway 117 Corridor Study, and the typical roadway sections identified in the County's Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Corridor Study identifies specific right of way needs and the plat will need to follow and be consistent with the preferred roadway alternative. The right of way will need to tie into the existing highway right of way north and south of the proposed development. The preliminary and final proposal will need to be reviewed and approved as to form and content by the County Surveyor. Specifically, given that most all of the existing corridor is platted at approximately 100 -ft total now, this new plat's right of way could also be a total of 100 ft total or 50 -ft on center. The typical roadway section for a 2 -lane urban undivided with continuous left turn lane (intersection) should be followed and revised to fit in the 100 -ft right of way planned, with an exact cross-section to be reviewed and approved by the County and City. The recommended cross-section could run as follows from west to east: 1' -offset; 8' -trail -5' - blvd; 2' -gutter; 4' -bike lane; 12' -right turn lane; 12'-thru lane; 12' -left turn lane; 12'-thru lane; 12' -right turn lane; 4' -bike lane; 2' -gutter; 5' -blvd; 8' -trail; 1' -offset (with variations in offset and/or blvd). Potentially, the right turn lanes could be shared Thru/Right Turn Lanes as exclusive left turn lanes are preferred over right turn lanes if space is a premium. It could be that the left turn lane or center left turn lane could be left out of the section where Pond "C" Wetland is existing to keep the road narrower in this section. From the Corridor Study centerline stationing reference numbers, it looks like the typical left turn lane is about 600 -800 -feet long, such that the LT lane at Hunter Drive falls at Sta 32+00 to Sta 40+00; and the LT lane at Longacres Dr falls at Sta 40+00 to Sta 48+00; and so on to the north. More exact design layouts can verify some of these details. 6. The technical details of the plat, its boundaries and form(s) will need to be reviewed and approved by the County Surveyor. The plats final grading plans, ponds, and right of way along CR 117/Galpin Blvd. will need to be reviewed and approved to show how this is set up for the potential future CR 117/Galpin Blvd. reconstruction. A cross reference of grading plans, profiles, and respective cross sections should be provided at key locations such as intersections, ponds, or other special features. 8. A new a draft master stormwater and pond management will need to be developed for this plat and area, based on planned development, road design elements, and the draft ponds planned from the Corridor Study Storm Drainage Plan. Ponds "D", "C", and potentially "B" will need to be verified accordingly. 9. Prior to any work affecting or on County highways or in County right of way, the applicant shall coordinate plans with the County Engineer and obtain a Utility or Excavating/Filling/Grading Permit(s) from Carver County Public Works: (htto:11www.co.carver.mn.us/how-do-i/apply-for/a-permit). Final details of locations, grades, and profiles affecting County roads as well as any utility connections will need to be reviewed and approved prior to any permits. 2 10. Any damages, modifications, or changes incurred on County highways from current or approved conditions will need to remedied or updated at development expense, including costs incurred by the County. These are comments at this time. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at dmccormick(aco.carver.mn.us or by phone at (952) 466-5208. Sincerely, W Dan McCormick, P.E. PTOE Transportation Manager Carver County Public Works 3 1 P a g e COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 CITY OF CHANNSEN Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL reviewPlease . respond no later than the reviewresponse deadline Agency Review Request Date: Agency Review Response Deadline: Date Application Filed: December 14, 2018 January 3 2019 December 14, 2018 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Kate Aanenson, AICP 952-227-1139 kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60 -Day Review Period Deadline: January 15, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. February 11, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. February 12, 2019 Application: Consider rezoning parcel from Rural Residential (RR) to Planned Unit Development (PUD); Wetland Alteration Permit, Subdivision of 191 acres including the preservation of approximately 100 acres and the creation of 191 lots. Planning Case: 2019-01 Web Pa e: www. ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2019-01 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: Federal Agencies: Adjacent Cities: ❑ Attorney ® Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Chaska ® Building Official ❑ US Fish & Wildlife ❑ Eden Prairie ® Engineer ❑ Jackson Township ® Fire Marshal Watershed Districts: ❑ Minnetonka ® Forester ❑ Shorewood ® Park Director ❑ Carver County WMO E] Victoria ® Water Resources ❑ Lower MN River ❑ Law Enforcement ❑ Minnehaha Creek Adjacent Counties: ® Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Carver County Agencies: ❑ Hennepin Utilities: El Scott ElCommunity Development ® Cable TV Mediacom ® Engineer — 9 F1 Electric Valley School Districts: ElEnvironmental Services —Minnesota ❑ Historical Society ® Electric —Xcel Energy ® Eastern Carver County 112 ❑ Parks ❑ Magellan Pipeline ® Minnetonka 276 ❑ Soil & Water Conservation District ® Natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy ® Phone — Centuryl-ink Other Agencies: State Agencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad ® Board of Water & Soil Resources Authority ❑ Health ❑ MN Landscape Arboretum ❑ Historical Society ❑ SouthWest Transit ® MCES ❑ TC&W Railroad ❑ Natural Resources -Forestry ® Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control ❑ Transportation � aolg -01 LENNAM December 13, 2018 Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Preliminary Plat application — Galpin Property Dear Ms. Aanenson; Included with this cover letter you will find the following items to supplement our PUD application for the Galpin Property: 1. Check #01108398 ($3,477.45) for subdivision of 191 lots 2. Updated project narrative Additionally, plan sets and corresponding technical information were delivered to City hall in the form of paper copy and electronically on 12/7 by our consulting engineer. Please let me know if you have any questions. On behalf of Lennar we look forward to working with the City of Chanhassen on this application. Best regards, oe JJ ablonski Director of Forward planning and Entitlement Lennar CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEC 14 2018 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT SCANNED I CITY OF CHANHASSEN P 0 BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 12/14/2018 12:16 PM Receipt No. 00396749 CLERK: dwashburn PAYEE: Lennar Family of Builders Minnesota Division 16305 36th Ave N, Suite 600 Plymouth MN 55446-4270 Galpin Site - Planning Case 2019-01 ------------------------------------------------------- Use & Variance 3,465.00 Wetland 275.00 Total Cash Credit Cd Check 1108398 Change SCANNED 3,740.00 0.00 262.55 3,477.45 0.00 GALPIN SITE - PLANNING CASE 2019-01 $0.00 Rezoning $600.00 Subdivision (over 3 lots) $2,865.00 $15 per lot (191 lots) $275.00 Wetland Alteration Permit $0.00 Variance $0.00 Notification Sign - WAIVED $0.00 Property Owners List (XX addresses x $3 each) - WAIVED $0.00 Escrow for recording variance documents $3,740.00 TOTAL $3,477.45 Check 01108398 from Lennar Family of Builders $262.55 Paid w/CC 12-14-18 $0.00 BALANCE OWED SCANNED PCaptq-oI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division -7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CHMIMSEN Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Dale: 1�I I r't (I � PC Dale: i t 1 � CC Date. _att t 1 09 60 -Day Review Date: Section 1: Application .• apply) (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment .........................$600 ❑� Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 r❑ Create over 3 lots.......................$6W + $15 per lot ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ( 191 lots) ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots).................................. $300 ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 ❑ Consolidate Lots .............................................. $150 ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 (IUP) ❑ Final Plat ..........................................................$700 ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)' ❑ All Others ......................................................... $425 'Additional escrow may be required for other applications El Rezoning through the development contract. (REZ) ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD)..................$750 ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ All Others ......................................................... $500 ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Sign Plan Review ................................................ $150 Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... "M $150 ❑ Administrative.................................................. $100 All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Commercial/industrial Districts`......................$500 ❑Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: (_thousand square feet) ElZoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) ................. $500 Include number of xie stirs employees: 'Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are cconcurrently, .......................... .............. Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_ units) each the appropriate fee shall be charged for eachh application. application. El Notification Sign (City to install and remove �� 1 v �c........................................................................................ $200 El"I Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate atter prrsapplicabon meeting) .:.......W . 0...... t ..�...................$3 per address ......... (— addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)....................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Penni ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements ( easements) ❑ Deeds TOTAL FEE: Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Preliminary plat application and rezoning to PUD for residential development Property Address or Location: _ Parcel #:aS 4P-90CX�l I C-> Total Acreage: 188.00 Legal Description:. Wetlands Present? Present Zoning: Rural Residential District (RR) Present Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Existing Use of Property: Vacant E]Check box if separate narrative is attached. 7141 Galpin Rd, Chanhassen ® Yes ❑ No Requested Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Requested Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density SCANNED Section 3: Property„ APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: in signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: US Home Corporation, DBA Lennar Contact: Joe Jablonski Address: 16305 36th Street NE, Suite 600 Phone: (952) 249-3014 City/State/Zip: Plymouth, Mn 55446 Cell: (612) 490-6076 Email: joe.jablonski@lennar.com Fax: Joe Jablonski °per""A"°""°° 10bnpd 12/13/18 Signature: oeb.zme.lzla+4seWa Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Andrea Bruce, VP for Comerica Bank 8 Trust, N.A. as Personal Representative Gerard Snover, VP Name: for the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson AND Paisley Park Enterprise, INC Contact: 3551 Hamlin Road Phone: 212-590-9992 Address: City/State/Zip: Auburn Hills, MI 48326 Cell: 215-622-8126 Email: abruc 22fomen .com Fax: NA Signature: 14.I/ . Date: 12/17/2018 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Pioneer Engineering Contact: Paul Cheme Address: 2422 Enterprise Drive Phone: (651) 251-0630 City/State/Zip: Mendota Heights Cell: Email: pcheme@pioneereng.com Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? `Other Contact Information: ❑ Property Owner Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑� Applicant Via: ❑• Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: El Engineer Via: ❑� Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: []Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. SAVE FORM PRINT FORM [SUBMIT FORM LENNAIT December 13, 2018 Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Preliminary Plat application — Galpin Property Dear Ms. Aanenson; Included with this cover letter you will find the following items to supplement our PUD application for the Galpin Property: 1. Check #01108398 ($3,477.45) for subdivision of 191 lots 2. Updated project narrative Additionally, plan sets and corresponding technical information were delivered to City hall in the form of paper copy and electronically on 12/7 by our consulting engineer. Please let me know if you have any questions. On behalf of Lennar we look forward to working with the City of Chanhassen on this application. Best regards, ce Jablonski Director of Forward planning and Entitlement Lennar Galpin Property City of Chanhassen Introduction e U.S. Home Corporation, d/b/a Lennar is proposing to develop Galpin Property (actual name TBD) in a manner that is sensitive to the environment and surrounding area. With this Preliminary Plat we are submitting a plan that has taken into account input from public leaders, staff, and neighbors. Our plan has 191 homes demonstrating how the property can be developed through the use of a PUD that will offer diverse housing opportunities and price points accompanied by the preservation of open space. Background/History In November 2017 the property was listed for sale by Comerica Bank; Trust NA, as personal representatives of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson and Paisley Park Enterprises. On several occasions the seller's agents and members of Lennar have met with City staff to begin reviewing the zoning standards and the best use for the property. In May of 2018 U.S. Home Corporation entered into an Option Agreement to purchase the property. Property Description The site consists of approximately 188 acres made up of several tax parcels (PID 25.6900010, 25.6900020, 25.6900030, 25.0100100, and 25.0100200) located in the Notheast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 23. All buildings have been removed and the property has been vacant for some time. The site suffers from frequent trespassers that use the property for walking trails. City Standards Land Use designation The property is designated for Low Density residential: RSF 1.2-4 units per acre. Pre -plat — 2.15 DU/Acre (191/88) Zoning Classification The site is currently zoned as Rural Residential with underlying zoning of RSF; low density residential 1.2-4 units per acre. Our plan requires a zoning change to PUD to allow flexibility and the relaxation of strict application of the zoning ordinance in exchange for greater environmental sensitivity and preservation of open space for public use. At 2.15 units per acre our plan also fits within the RSF density classification. 2 Surrounding Land Uses Residential developments of varying densities surround the site to the North, South, and West. To the West, across Galpin is Long Acres which was developed as a PUD to allow flexibility in design standards. Our primary street connections appropriately line up with Hunter Drive and Long Acres Drive. Boarding the property to the North and South are existing neighborhoods zoned RSF. The existing neighborhoods to the North (Ashling Meadows and Lucy Ridge) provide road stubs to the subject property. There are no road connections to the South. Lake Lucy, and Lake Ann and their surrounding wetlands are located to the East. Plan modifications since initial concept review Overall • 50+ acres designated for City Park • Lot count has been reduced to 191 homesites (2.15 DU/Acre) • Stormwater ponding has been incorporated to accommodate Galpin Rd upgrades • Perimeter buffering has been evaluated North end • Through street from Galpin to Lucy Ridge has been eliminated • Buffering through preservation has been identified • 14 Lots have been eliminated to minimize environmental impacts South end • Density in Southern 1/3 of the property has decreased • Lots along Southern property line have been enlarged from 55' wide to 75' wide to accommodate standard homes rather than Villa. • Storm sewer and Emergency Overflows have been identified to alleviate water issues in adjacent neighborhood • Back yard areas along South property line have been expanded allowing for the preservation of existing trees • Landscape buffering has been integrated into the plan Open Space Preservation The City of Chanhassen's 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies significant trail improvements along the Eastern boundary of the property that would enhance the Lake Ann Park and trail system by completing important connections between Lake Ann, Lake Lucy and Galpin Road. Our plan for the Galpin property focuses housing development closer to Galpin and preserves approximately 50 acres of land adjacent to Lake Lucy and Lake Ann that could be used for park dedication to the City. By mixing lot sizes our plan strategically places the 191 homes on 88 acres of land giving the opportunity to preserve significantly more open space for use by the residents of Chanhassen then would be available if strict RSF zoning standards were followed. Preserving the open space in this manner not only minimizes environmental impacts but also significantly reduces the length of public infrastructure (sewer, water, roads) required for long term maintenance by the City. Building Plans/Product Information Extensive research on housing availability and market conditions within the City of Chanhassen has guided us in putting together a plan that is matched by a product portfolio that includes architecturally interesting variety of homes, and price points, that meet multiple buyer niches. Landmark Series - Designed with efficiency in mind, the Landmark series meets the demands of today's challenging housing market by offering a fantastic value planned specially for 65'& 75' wide homesites. Lennar has successfully built the Landmark series in Reflections at Lake Riley, Boulder Cove, and Camden Ridge. Typical footprints are 50' wide allowing the ability to maintain setbacks designated by zoning standards. A variety of houseplans and elevations make up this series offering square footages ranging from 2,200 sq ft to 3,200 sq ft plus the ability to finish the basement to add footage to the home. With families in mind, the homes typically include four bedrooms, a large open living space on the main level, a master suite, mud room, and three car garage. Sixty-five foot wide lots allow the ability to preserve open space without compromising the integrity of the neighborhood. Typical side yard setbacks will be maintained. An interesting streetscape will be maintained through the incorporation of a variety of elevations, materials, and color packages. Lots are arranged in a manner that will include an assortment of walk -outs, look -outs, and flats. Luxury Villa — The 34 Luxury Villa are designed for the 55' wide homesites just North of the Southern entrance. The Luxury Villa provides minimal maintenance housing for an underserved market in Chanhassen; and the Twin Cities in general, the `empty nester'. Designed for single level living, the Villa homes offer a spacious first floor that includes a master suite, fireplace, open living room, gourmet kitchen, and study. A deck or three season porch is included with the home to allow the opportunity to enjoy the natural features of Galpin Property . Multiple elevations and color packages will be incorporated to reduce monotony. Traditional - The 31 Traditional homesites on the North end of the property are currently being marketed for sale to custom homebuilders. Lermar may elect to participate in the construction of some homes in that area Environmental Impacts Wetlands - A wetland delineation was completed on the site in September 2017 and was followed by a Wetland classification analysis. Wetland impacts have been minimized by careful planning and the preservation of open space. Following RSF standards for the entire property would require more impact to existing wetlands for the extension of public infrastructure (sewer, water, streets) to serve the upland adjacent to Lake Ann and Lake Lucy. Tree Preservation — Preservation of open space for public use will allow the opportunity to preserve large wooded areas that may otherwise be disturbed with development. Tree replacement as required by code has been factored into the landscape plan. Following the RSF zoning guidelines would have a much greater impact on the large stands of trees located in the upland areas fronting Lake Ann and Lake Lucy that are contemplated by Public Park with this plan. Water Quality — Water quality will be managed through the incorporation of on- site ponding and other appropriate erosion control measures. We are evaluating the potential for water re -use on site to supplement irrigation systems. Lennar is committed to following stormwater policies enacted by the City of Chanhassen and the Minnesota Pollution Control Association (MPCA). Plans have been submitted to the Riley Purgatory Watershed to allow for the simultaneous review of stormwater management designs. Flexibility through the use of PUD Our plan requires a zoning change to PUD to allow flexibility and the relaxation of strict application of the zoning ordinance in exchange for greater environmental sensitivity and preservation of open space for public use. The items we are requesting flexibility include; lot width and area, cul de sac length, and relaxation of front setbacks along the North and South boarders. All three items are requested for consideration to allow for the preservation of open space and trees. Homeowners Associations) A Master Homeowners Association will be established to maintain private common areas and community monuments. A Sub -Association will be created to take care of the common elements within the Villa area The Villa will be `full maintenance' in nature to include; professional management, mowing, plowing, and exterior upkeep of the homes. Owners of single family homes will be responsible for their own upkeep and maintenance subject to City Ordinance and Architectural Controls established within the Master Association. 5 Summary Lennar has a long history of building successful Communities in the City of Chanhassen under the names Lemur, Ryland, Lundgren Bros. Construction, and Orrin Thompson Homes. We are very excited for the opportunity that lends itself through the careful development of this fantastic property and ask for your support. Project Team Developer: U.S. Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar Builder: Lennar Corporation Primary Contact: Joe Jablonski Planner/Engineer/Surveyor: Pioneer Engineering Wetland Specialist: TBD Landscape Architect: Pioneer Engineering Legal Council: Vantage Law Group Association Manager: TBD Project summary (US Homeff ennar) Galpin Property —188 Gross Acres Total Homesites — 191 Approximate Developed Area — 89 acres Open Space — 50 acres Preserved wetlands — 49 acres Traditional homesites — 31 Average Lot — 90' wide Landmark Homesites —126 Average Lot — 65' wide Villa Homesites — 34 Average Lot — 55' wide 11 03138566 Lennar Family of Builders JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. STUB CHECK NO. 1108398 90000D.1010.114 1 of 1 DATE 12/03/18 INVOICE CO 8 NUMBER DATE PAYMFATADVICE GROSS DISCOUNT NET 17656 020406-0171118 093018 P/0257250200 LYMANN $12.45 50.00 $12.45 17780 201811 346500 IF 112818 GALPIN PROPERTY $3,465.00 $0.00 53,465.00 1874551 Cityofurwrnaswn 77M M.,ket u eve PO Bus 147 $3,47745 $0.00 53477.45 00 NOT ACCEPT THIS CHECK UNLESS YOU CAN SEE A DUAL -TONE TRUE WATERMARK THAT APPEARS AS A CHAIN LINK PATTERN WHEN HELD TO THE LIGHT. ;_• Lennar Family of Builders Minnesota Division 16305 36th Ave N, Ste 600 Plymouth, MN 55446-4270 PAY JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Chicago, IL 01108398 70-2322 '-• Void if over 180 days 719 DATE AMOUNT' 12/03/18 $*****3,477.45 THREE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTY SEVEN AND 45/100 sssss«ssssssssssss«sss«s+..•.«. A ,F *A TO i,. II BoulevardTHE City Of • ORD OF • Box 147 Chanhassen MN 1 Two Sigratum Required on Annouras Over S100,000.00 L THE FACE OF THIS CHECK HAS A BLUE AND GREEN BACKGROUND ANY OTHER COLORS MAY BE EVIDENCE OF CHEMICAL ALTERATION OR ERASURE - SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR MORE SAFETY FEATURES 11.OLL083981I• 1:0719232261: 88629333 LII• memo Company name To: Paul Oehme, City Engineer From: Vanessa Strong, Water Resources Coordinator CC: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Date: August 9, 2018 Re: FW: Galpin Property—Couple thoughts 1. I'm hearing the rhetoric about how the Anthem development put sediment into Lake Lucy and that destroyed the lake. 1'd like Vanessa or someone with expertise to address questions form council about Lake Lucy To be honest I did not work for the City during the development review process for Anthem. My comments are based upon interpretation of the development documents and correspondence available in the Engineering Department files. Here goes: It would be nearly impossible for sediment from the Anthem development to have entered Lake Lucy. Under existing and proposed conditions, the site is divided into two major drainage areas. A line that extends approximately from the southeast property corner to 200 feet south of the northwest corner divides the drainage areas. Everything north and east drains under Yosemite and ultimately into Christmas Lake. Everything south and west drains to the south towards Lake Lucy. The drainage leaves the site via a culvert that goes under Lake Lucy Road and discharges onto private property to the south. Regardless of which path the drainage takes once it passes under Lake Lucy Rd it all ends up in a wetland with no constructed outlet. i rs--r ..1 Note: The site has been non-compliant for discharging sediment to the south when their construction stormwoter basin failed during a storm event in 2017. The City required the developer to bring their construction stormwoter practices back into compliance, and install the permanent outlet structure. The property owner to the south requested to leave the rock that had discharged onto their property. The developer eventuallyfollowed compliance orders. The sediment never reached Lake Lucy. Is the quality of Lake Lucy substantially different today than 5 years ago? Water quality of Lake Lucy is very similar to 5 years' ago. There was a brief nutrient spike from 2012-2017 similar to the spike from 1982-1987 and improvement from 2016-2017, but the overall average water quality has remained consistent since 1972. Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District annually produces excellent Lake Health Fact Sheets. I have attached the fact sheet for Lake Lucy at the bottom and also included the link here: htto://www.robcwd.ore/files/2415/2155/9356/Lucv 2017 finai.odf What causes to growth and expansion of Lily Pads in the lake? Is it sediment or something else? Nutrients from fertilizing... 1'd like to hear facts on what likely has caused the growth of weeds and lily pad in the North West portion of Lake Lucy, in front of Lucy Ridge Lane. Its always important to remember that lakes are not static features. They age just as we do. Lake Lucy is currently Eutrophic, similar to late middle age. Lake Lucy is also a shallow lake (average depth less than 15'). Eutrophic, shallow lakes are not as resilient to changes in climate (hotter, wetter). They do not bounce back as quickly from environmental impacts. Too many nutrients upset their system easier than younger lakes. Shallow lakes can quickly flip between clear water, and turbid water states. Eventually they age to hypereutrophic and then, most likely, wetlands. Lily pads, just like duckweed, are native vegetation. They are a natural, healthy part of the ecosystem. Population fluctuations and locations over time are normal. You may see more lily pads in shallow lakes due to the larger littoral zone (area where sunlight penetrates all the way to the sediment and allows aquatic plants (macrophytes) to grow). Unfortunately, Lake Lucy is exposed to several factors that speed up eutrophication (aging process) and changing from clear to turbid water state: • Invasive species including Curleyleaf Pondweed, Eurasian Watermilfoil, and common carp (carp management occurred in 2011) • Nearly the entire eastern shoreline is without a buffer to protect the lake from erosion, and nutrient pollution. Approximately 2,200 feet of shoreline is mowed turf to the edge of water, and riprap. • Development. All development affects lake health, and not for the better. Large shoreline buffers, density transfer, and preservation of natural wetlands/waterways are just a few of the tools to minimize the impact. I previously conducted a considerable amount of education and research on shallow lakes, including the Shallow Lakes Forum http://www.arboretum.umn.edu/ShallowLakes20l5.asr)x What are the measures that are used to prevent erosion from the construction area from getting into the watershed, and have these proven to be successful in the post... despite what appears to have happened with Anthem development. The Anthem development contract did exceed the erosion and sediment control requirements of the MPGA. Chanhassen has consistently required these conditions for all developments, and tends to take a proactive approach to erosion and sediment control. How successful these measures are is heavily dependent on the developers' commitment to adhering to the requirements. Anthem's greatest difficulty is the extremely slow pace of their construction. Of the different developers that have worked on Chanhassen, in speaking with staff, Lennar has been one of the best at erosion and sediment control compliance. Even so, there are additional measures we can take to improve erosion and sediment control for the Galpin property. These are the requirements in the Anthem Development Contract related to erosion and sediment control that were above and beyond what is required by the MPCA: 1. Site Erosion and Sediment Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any utility construction is commenced or building permits are issued, the erosion and sediment control plan, Plan 8, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the city. The City may impose additional erosion and sediment control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion and sediment control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessaryfor seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion and sediment transport. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion and sediment control plan and schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion and sediment transport at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building Permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the erosion and sediment control requirements. Erosion and sediment control needs to be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored, even if construction has been completed and accepted. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion and sediment control, the City will r Ile, authorize the removal of the erosion and sediment control, i.e. hay bales and silt fence. The Developer shall remove and dispose of the erosion and sediment control measures. 2. Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or other Building. Before o building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be furnished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-11. 3. Cleanup. The Developer shall maintain a neot and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 4. Storm Sewer Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for cleaning and maintenance of the storm sewer system (including ponds, pipes, catch basins, culverts and swoles) within the plat and the adjacent off-site storm sewer system that receives storm water from the plat. The Developer shall follow all instructions it receives from the City concerning the cleaning and maintenance of the storm sewer system. The Developer's obligations under this paragraph shall end two (2) years after the public street and storm drainage improvements in the plat have been accepted by the City. Twenty percent (20%) of the storm sewer costs, shown under section 6 of the special provisions of this contract will be held by the Cityfor the duration of the 2 -year maintenance period. 5. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the Cityfor all costs incurred by the Cityfor providing construction and erosion and sediment control inspections. This cost will be periodically billed directly to the Developer based on the actual progress of the construction. Payment shall be due in accordance with Article 21E of this Agreement. 6. Runoff rates and volumes cannot be increased to the south. 7. Curve numbers and drainage areas shall accurately reflect pre and post -construction conditions. 8. Any disturbance of the buffer areas shall be restored with native vegetation appropriate to the area and the plans shall note this and the seed mix to be used. 9. A plan shall be prepared showing the placement of wetland buffer monuments including a monument at midpoint of east lot line for Lot 11. 10. All buffer monuments shall be installed prior to the sale of any lots. 11. A detailed plan of the filtration basins, consistent with the MN Stormwater Manual shall be submitted with the final plat submittal for review and approval by city staff. It shall include, at a minimum, a plan view, a profile view, all necessary elevations, any in situ soil preparation, methodologies to be employed to protectfrom construction traffic, soil filter media specifications, any plantings and any appurtenant work to be done. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN One of the most important projects the watershed worked on in 2017 was updating its Watershed Managment Plan. 900 This watershed management plan (also called the 10 -Year Plan) guides the District's actions for the next 10 years. community played an essential ole by participating in a public engagement process. Close to 500 stakeholders engaged in this process, making their voices heard about their values for clean water. The graphic to the right highights how the :ommunitry contributed to the inning effort. The draft plan was relased for public review in late 2017. After comments are addressed, the Fr - /I Stakeholder Meetings F m, ♦�♦ n CONeeewo `o'as Community yey Meetings h •• •♦ Thank you! To everyone who shared their thoughts, ideas, hopes and concerns. We truly vOrr La � ' ttc BLUFF CREEK '� WATlRSXFO DISj{IICr y .". ,��':J•�-r�%R a �+•: ,.� . 5 r �- District will submit a trial plan for approval in appreciate you being a part of this process. 2018. Check our website for updates on the process: rpbcwd.org DIVE DEEPER Interested in learning more? Explore the following reports on our website. Aquatic plants Watershed study Dunne, M. and Newman, R. 2017. Aquatic Plant Community of BARR Engineering. 2013. Lake Lucy and Lake Ann: Lakes Lucy, Mitchell, Susan, Riley and Staring: Annual Report for Use Attainability Analysis. 2016. University of Minnesota. Carp management JaKa, J. and Newman, R. 2014. Aquatic Plant Community of Sajer P.G., Headrick,M., Miller B. D. and Sorensen Lakes Ann, Lotus, Lucy, Mitchell, Susan, Riley and Staring within P. W. 2014. Development and implementation of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed: Final Report 2009 - a sustainable strategy to control common carp in 2014. University of Minnesota. Riley Creek Chain of Lakes. U of M. Wenck Associates Inc. 2015. Lake Lucy Aquatic Plant Stormwater ponds Management Plan. RPBCWD. 2013. Stormwater pond project. CHARACTERISTICS Size 88 acres "7 Volume 558 acre -ft Average depth 6.5 ft Max depth 20 ft Watershed size 997 acres Land draining directly into 111 acres MPCA lake classification Shallow Impairment listing Mercury J7rophic status Eutrt Common fish Bluegill, Northern Pike, Yellow Bullhead Invasive species Eurasian Watermilfoil, Common Carp i Water quality in Lake Lucy increased from 2016 to 2017,' and met two of the clean water standards set by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The graphs on the next page show the trends over time. The red line on each graph marks the MPCA standard. The goal is for the average values (the dots) to be below the red line. During the growing season (June - September), district staff Water quality graphs 1972 - z017 Points are growing season gun -Sep) averages. Thin lines are the min and max values for each year 0.12 N 7 0 0.06 L CL N L 0.03 CL Ace M 80 bA rp 60 r 40 a 0 o 20 L U 0 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 Visit La Ke Lucy every Otner WeeK LO collect water samples ana take measurements. The samples are sent to a lab and tested for several compounds including total phosphorous (TP) and chlorophyll a (Chl-a). Staff also measure how clear the water is using a disk that is lowered into the water until it can no longer be seen. These parameters help indicate whether the water is clean. Lucy is classified as a "Shallow Lake", which means that it is generally less than 15 feet deep and light can reach the bottom in most of the lake. This ample light means that shallow lakes often have a lot of aquatic plants, and are habitat to many types of fish and birds. To be considered healthy by the MPCA, shallow lakes need to be clear enough to see one meter down, and have low TP and Chl-a levels. A volunteer extracting invasive Common Carp from Lake Lucy. Lake Lucy on a beautiful summer afternoon. �e ILUCY hed� Rainwater runoff, the water that flows across yards, parking lots, and �2 t� streets into stormdrains, is one of the main causes of pollution in urban areas. You can take simple actions to help protect Lake Lucy. Keep the curb Water with Salt Reuse Build a clean care smart the rain raingarden CL Sweep up leaves, Grass requires The salt we use Collect Raingardens soak grass clippings 1 -inch of water per to melt ice can and reuse up water and filter and fertilizer from week: about one pollute our lakes rainwater with driveways hour of sprinkling and creeks. Use a rain barrel. out pollution. Visit our website for and per week if it has salt sparingly and help. not rained. always shovel �a first. 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 0.0 max 2017 min E TP <0.06 mg/I � 0.5 0.07 0.03 0.05 Chl-a <20 ug/I Poor water clarity 2.7 29.8 a 7.12 30.01 $ecchl a) 1.0 6.9 0.5 1.3 3.15 0.8 1.3 R. Good water clarity -0 1.5 s �G 2.0 Ln ti 2.5 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 Summary table ""I ►I M PCA standard max 1972-2016 min average max 2017 min average TP <0.06 mg/I 0.11 0.03 0.064 0.07 0.03 0.05 Chl-a <20 ug/I 87 2.7 29.8 47.2 7.12 30.01 $ecchl >1 m 6.9 0.5 1.3 3.15 0.8 1.3 ""I ►I "These lakes are not generally beautiful but they are rich in game, in wild rice and other useful plants."- Joseph Nicollet on August 7, 1838 in the Minnesota River Valley near the Hawk Creek and Yellow Medicine confluence MINNESOTA'S NATURAL HERITAGE SHALLOW LAKES; DEEP HERITAGE Echoing across the calm surface of water, the gurgling "oak -a -lee' of a red -winged blackbird broadcasts its irritation at someone invading his territory. This medium-sized songbird with a bright red patch flies between cattails fiercely challenging all outsiders. A group of diving ducks with rusty heads, white bodies, black chests and rear ends, float among the emerging vegetation. Canvasbacks, or known by their nickname "cans," feed on sago pondweed and aquatic insects to gather strength for a long flight south to their winter home. Sago pondweed and other aquatic plants (macrophytes) spread throughout the water column holding together the entire shallow lakes ecosystem. With its abundant fruit and tubers, sago pondweed is one of the important food sources for waterfowl and great fish habitat Aquatic insects like the water fleas and scuds dart here and there among the macrophytes providing a tasty meal for both waterfowl and fish. A healthy population of game fish like northern pike gives people a chance to enjoy shallow lakes. Waterfowl hunting on Minnesota's shallow lakes has long been part of the state's natural heritage. Lakes like Christina, Swan, Big Rice, and Thief provide premier waterfowl migration habitat and support a rich hunting tradition. A complex system Shallow lakes account for about one third of the 11,000 plus lakes found in Minnesota. Many shallow lakes have been lost to drainage prior to the 1970s. They also dont get the respect or attention as the deeper ones found up north. This is unfortunate because shallow lakes are a rich resource providing wildlife habitat, water quality benefits and recreation opportunities. A healthy shallow lake is characterized by water clear enough to see to the bottom, with fairly thick weed beds with fish and other aquatic organisms using the plants for both food and protection. Everything is connected as the aquatic plants use nutrients to grow, hold sediment on the bottom, and provide a place for zooplankton to hide from predators. Shallow lakes have been impacted by the changing landscape as agriculture and urban development transform the natural environment by eating up prairie, wetlands and forests. Many of our shallow lakes have become impaired as the water clarity turns murky from blooming algae and suspended sediment particles. Submerged plants disappear without adequate sunlight reaching them and it becomes a snowball effect as fish, aquatic insects and other animals suffer. Here in Minnesota, professionals and citizens are coming together to help save some of our most beloved shallow lakes hit hard from increased nutrient loading, too much water, and the invasion of undesirable species like carp. Over the last decade or two, an increased effort to protect and restore this valuable resource has seen success in places like Lake Christina and Swan Lake. Ultimately, it will take strong partnerships, more funding, and patience to make sure shallow lakes have a bright future. SHALLOW LAKES REFLECT THEIR LANDSCAPE Minnesota has approximately 4,000 shallow lakes pretty evenly spread across the state's three ecological zones: • Laurentian mixed forest (forest), • Eastern broadleaf forest (transition), and • Tall -grass prairie (prairie). Shallow lakes reflect these overall differences in the landscape. As one might expect, a shallow lake found in a northeastern forest of Minnesota looks different than one found on the former prairie in the state's southwest corner. Typically, shallow lakes of the Distribution of S forest zone support an abundance of aquatic plants and have clear water. One of the key aquaticplants is wild rice, found in many of these forested lakes. This aquatic grass is high in protein and is an important food for i .+ many birds including 'n ` waterfowl and the red -winged blackbird. Water quality on most of these <• northern lakes hasn't suffered because many wetlands are still intact in the surrounding water- v shed and few nutrients are found in the soil. Dam construction and the stabilization of water •. levels have caused r ' some negative }� { impacts on these shallow lakes, especially on wild rice hi the transition zone, shallow lakes vary in condition with some in good shape, while others suffer from environmental degradation. Here we see variable conditions in the watershed and as a result, more issues for these lakes to contend with. Wetland drainage for agricultural production has been more common along with other land -use changes. Shallow lakes in the prairie zone have seen the biggest transformation. Many of these lakes are in poor ecological condition because of high nutrient levels, low water clarity and few aquatic plants. There have been more impacts here on wildlife, especially migrating waterfowl. hallow Lakes This map indicates the location of shallow lakes 50 acres or greater in size 15 feet or less maximum depth r. Forest 2 SHALLOW LAKE TYPES There is a great deal of variation among all lakes, including shallow ones, in Minnesota due to differences in geology, soils and precipitation patterns across the state. Found in northern Minnesota and characterized as low nutrient, often with wild rice. Found in central Minnesota and characterized by shallower basins with a less jagged landscape, and moderate nutrient levels. Found in western and southwestern Minnesota and characterized by shallower depths and greater nutrient -enrichment A major factor for these lakes is land erosion, contributing additional nutrients and sediment. SHALLOW LAKE ECOLOGY As a resource, shallow lakes tend to get ignored by the public and short changed when it comes to appreciating their value. Even though they will never be confused with the deeper and clearer lakes found in northern Minnesota, this shouldn't stop people from enjoying what shallow lakes have to offer. Typically, shallow lakes fall on a spectrum between deep lakes and wetlands. Sunlight reaches the bottom of shallow lakes allowing aquatic plants to grow over most of the lake bed, rather than a ring around the shoreline commonly seen in deep lakes. A big difference between shallow and deep lakes has to do with thermal � stratification during the summer months. Water in shallow lakes doesn't stratify, meaning the water mixes with the bottom sediments throughout the summer. These sediments can be rich in nutrients, especially from the water flowing off the surrounding landscape into the lakes. Wetlands have more emergent vegetation and dry out more frequently than shallow lakes. Sometimes wetlands dont even have standing water, where shallow lakes do. Shallow lakes can have emergent vegetation like cattail and bulrush, but usually not as much as wetlands. Submerged aquatic plant growth (plants growing under the surface of the water) can be lush and widespread in shallow lakes. Many shallow lakes support a lush growth of aquatic plants due to an abundant level of sunlight and nutrients. Healthy shallow lakes can be characterized by a diverse community of aquatic plants and clear water. An absence of these plants often results in green water thick with algae. A shallow lake featuring both clear water and few aquatic plants is very rare. Shallow lakes dominated by algae and few aquatic plants are "turbid," suffering from poor water quality. Aquatic plants protect the bottom sediments from wind re -suspension, compete for nutrients with algae, and provide food and habitat for fish and wildlife. The littoral or shoreline zone will be dominated by cattails, bulrush and reeds, or stands of emergent aquatic plants. A healthy shallow lake has vegetation covering much of the area including submerged plants like wild celery and sago pondweed. The plants are also used for habitat by invertebrates or aquatic insects, an important food source for waterfowl and fish. Due to their shallow nature, these lakes tend to have winterkill of fish on a fairly regular basis. As a result, the fish communities are usually dominated by species tolerant of low dissolved oxygen levels like northern pike and bullheads. Shallow lakes can serve as northern pike spawning areas as well as providing a sport fishery on a boom and bust basis. Fish populations can also have impacts on water clarity by affecting invertebrate populations and the rate of nutrient cycling in shallow lakes. Water quality is another important benefit of shallow lakes. This nutrient -rich environment full of plants helps lower nitrogen and phosphorus levels found in some of our impaired waters, along with allowing sediment to drop out of the water column. Shallow lakes can also lessen the damage of flooding by storing water and slowly releasing it throughout the year. Finally, shallow lakes are important to people who live along them and also the general public. They have a beauty and a value that other waterbodies cant begin to duplicate. One value is the diversity of plants found in the water and surrounding shoreline, creating a flowering bonanza throughout the growing season. Shallow lakes are also a great place to enjoy wildlife all year round. Communities and sportsmen clubs have discovered the economic impact of this important resource for a variety of recreational opportunities. As with any resource, not all shallow lakes are created equal, however they do share some of the same characteristics. Most shallow lakes are eutrophic or richer in nutrients. Shallow lakes are different too because of variables like the surrounding landscape, land -use practices, local ordinances, and how the lake is used by the general public, sportsmen clubs and resource managers. Wild Rice & Shallow Lakes Harvested for centuries by American Indian tribes in the Great Lakes Region, wild rice has played an important cultural role and also as a food source. Wild rice or "Manomin' has a high protein content, and is easy to store with an indefinite shelf life. Wild rice also provides food and shelter for many fish and wildlife species. More than 17 wildlife species of greatest conservation need in Minnesota use wild rice lakes as habitat for reproduction and foraging. • One acre of natural wild rice can produce more than 500 pounds of seed. It is recognized as an important source of food for waterfowl during fall migration. Stems of wild rice provide nesting material for many birds and wildlife species. 4 IMPACTS ON SHALLOW LAKES Watershed modifications, introduction of exotic species, and climatic conditions are some of the factors affecting the health of our shallow lakes in Minnesota. Degradation of these lakes causes them to switch from the clear -water state to a turbid -state. Unfortunately, a lake in this very little, if any, fish and wildlife valu Water levels on many of the state's shallow lakes have risen because of increased precipitation and runoff over the last two decades. Today, ifs common to see many of these lakes surrounded by large dead trees standing in four or more feet of water. An increase in water depth can contribute to dramatic changes in lake ecology. Deeper water decreases the frequency and severity of winterkill as fish communities become dominated by bullheads and carp. Increased water depths can also contribute to the decline or total disappearance of rooted aquatic plants. Ditching and drainage of wetlands has had dire consequences for many lakes in the agricultural regions of Minnesota. Usually the water drained from these wetlands is diverted into waterbodies too difficult to drain - like a shallow lake. Now these The biggest impacts on the health of shallow lakes are taking place in the prairie zone, and to some extent, those found in the transition zone. A combination of several factors have degraded these lakes, resulting in poor water quality, abundant algae and lack of wildlife. These impacts can be divided into two general categories: • External nutrient loading and • Internal nutrient loading. Nutrients flowing into lakes from their watersheds are referred to as external loads. The condition offers r .. landscape around these lakes has been transformed with the loss of the prairie and drainage of wetland e. 1 Th t I dsca to 1 d Th lakes receive more water than in the past and at a faster rate due to "drainage improvements" of the watershed. Some areas of the state have seen over 99 percent of the wetlands drained (i.e. Heron Lake). Conversion of grasslands to row crops has also impacted shallow lakes by increasing the amount of nutrient -rich sediment erosion entering the shallow lakes due to erosion. Wetlands that once surrounded these lakes used to retain water, nutrients and sediment that now flows directly into the waterbody through drainage networks. S. e Curren ant o >s m nsrve y 001-r- . ese changes have negatively impacted shallow lakes. Blue-green algae, or cyanobacteria, is found throughout the state and thrives in warm, shallow, nutrient -rich lakes of central and southern Minnesota. Internal nutrient loading has also caused problems for shallow lakes, in addition to the extra Over the last twenty years, scientists and managers have begun to understand how fish affect internal loading, in particular invasive species like carp. The feeding and metabolic activities of carp, and other fish, exacerbates the nutrient problems in these prairie shallow lakes by increasing internal nutrient loading. By stirring up the bottom as they feed, these fish move nutrients from the sediments into the water column, along with feeding on invertebrates found in the bottom sediment layer. Once fish eat something from the sediment layer, they also excrete nutrients into the water. Nutrients released into the water spur the growth of algae, particularly the harmful blue-green algae. Under certain conditions, blue-green algae can tum toxic and has caused the death of dogs, cattle and other animals. For humans, it can result in a variety of reactions depending on whether it is by skin contact or ingesting water. INVASIVE SPECIES AND OTHER EMERGING THREATS TO SHALLOW LAKES Carp, curly -leaf pondweed, and hybrid cattail are all invasive exotic species and have been found in shallow lakes in Minnesota. Each poses current and future threats to these lakes along with other emerging threats, like the increase in shoreland development around shallow lakes. Carp The common carp has been contributing to habitat degradation to lakes in southern Minnesota for decades, but noon Carp and other undesirable fish are becoming more common in shallow lakes because they are able to move from lake to lake through a complex drainage network created by intensive tiling and ditching. They also continue to exist in many of these waters Curly -leaf pondweed (also known as curly cabbage) grows from the shore to depths of up to 15 feet. To manage this plant, professionals apply herbicides or mechanically harvest the plant. The Minnesota DNR offers grants for control efforts in some lakes. Hybrid Cattail Minnesota has one native species of cattail - broad-leaved. Narrow leaf cattail is not native, but enraart frnm tlha Pact rnact and hybridized with broadleaf cattail. Both cause problems by dominating native plants and reducing open -water areas in shallow lakes. This aggressive plant can also clog a lake's outlet, contributing to higher water levels. Invasive cattails can be managed through a variety of mechanisms, including biological, physical and chemical controls (permits required). Muskrats provide a because of the lack of winterkill. Removing carp is a strategy for managing shallow lakes. One way to remove them is by temporarily de -watering a lake, commonly called a drawdown. Another method to remove fish is to apply rotenone to the water. This is a natural chemical derived from tropical plants that is toxic to fish. Rotenone applications are becoming more common in Minnesota and elsewhere, including Iowa, Wisconsin, Florida and Europe. Curly -leaf pondweed As an invasive exotic plant, curly -leaf pondweed impacts a shallow lake by reducing native plant diversity and contributing to internal nutrient loading. Growing under a different lifecycle than native aquatic plants, it begins growing early - even under the ice. Native plants start to grow later in the spring but are shaded out by the taller curly -leaf pondweed. This plant also dies off earlier in the summer and as it decays, nutrients are released into the water causing algae blooms. natural and efficient biological control by creating openings in cattail stands for waterfowl. Cattail can also provide some benefits such as filtering out nutrients and protecting shoreline from erosion. Other Invasive Species Several other invasive species - hydrilla, zebra mussels, phragmites, silver and big head carp - are potential threats. While no one knows how these species will exactly impact shallow lakes, they have negatively affected other areas of North America. • Hydrilla is an invasive aquatic species that has similar impacts as Eurasian watermilfoil. • Zebra mussels, first established in Lake Superior, have smothered native mussels and been linked to die -offs of both fish and wildlife. • The common reed or phragmites is another exotic plant that can dominate native plants. • Silver and big head carp haven't established a population in Minnesota but could have a similar or greater impact as the common carp. 6 Climate Change Climate change is another potential threat to shallow lakes found in Minnesota. At this time, no one knows exactly what kind of long term impact it will have on the resource. Research has identified that winterkills will no longer be as common. Fewer and less severe winterkills have already been noted as a concern by experts in the shallow lakes field. Shoreline Development The development of shallow lake shoreline has been increasing as a result of fewer acres being available on deeper lakes for cabins and homes. In the past, people overlooked the shallower lakes because of their desire to live on a lake where you could swim, boat and fish. Demand for lakeshore hasn't diminished even though there are fewer places to be found on deeper lakes. As a result people have begun to look at shallow lakes. In tum, this has the potential for water quality impacts including increased nutrient loading, loss of shoreline vegetation that filters runoff and loss of aquatic plants. Sometimes people moving onto these lakes may not realize shallow lakes are different than deep lakes. They may have "deep lake" expectations and desire less vegetation, deeper water and more fish. At times this can be achieved through intensive fish management, winter aeration, and macrophyte control; however, shallow lakes are not going to fully mimic "up north" lakes. Usually, some of these activities such as removing aquatic plants may be harmful to water quality in shallower lakes. MANAGING SHALLOW LAKES: MITIGATING IMPACTS Like most of Minnesota's natural resources, shallow lakes may need to be managed in order to achieve or maintain good water quality and habitat. However, such management needs to be consistent with the condition of the resource. A logical management goal for lakes in good condition is to maintain the ecosystem by preventing water quality degradation. Those in poor condition will likely require some action if the resource can be improved. Research and on the ground projects have shown that lake watersheds can be restored and managed to reduce external nutrient loading into lakes. Deep lakes often show improved water quality soon after completion of watershed management initiatives. Unfortunately, shallow lakes dont respond with a dramatic improvement in water quality from watershed management. In addition to working on the watershed, it is often necessary to manage the internal nutrient loads in shallow lakes. Fish through their feeding behavior can move nutrients from the sediments into the water column. If fish, as the cause of internal nutrient loading, are not removed or reduced, the lake will show little if any improvement in water clarity. Reducing or managing excessive nutrient inputs from the watershed is important for a healthy shallow lake. Changes in the watershed contribute many of the nutrients that are being internally cycled. Watershed management has a major impact on the long-term maintenance of a properly functioning shallow lake. In many cases, watershed management needs to be combined with in -lake management to reduce internal nutrient cycling. SHALLOW LAKES CASE STUDY: LAKE CHRISTINA Lake Christina has been referred to as a 4,000 - acre duck pasture. The abundance of waterfowl have made this a hunting Mecca since the beginning of the last century. Tens of thousands of ducks and hundreds of thousands of coots can be found on the lake when it is in good condition. This is one of the most studied and intensivel managed shallow lakes in North America. Located in west -central Minnesota, it sits at the junction of the transition and prairie ecological zones. The lake has long been a favorite place for migrating water- fowl, especially canvasbacks to stop, rest, and eat Situated on the rolling prairie, much of the surrounding landscape was too steep for breaking the soil and the intensive crop practices found in other places with shallow lakes. As a result large patches of native prairie and wetlands still exist in Lake Christina's watershed. Despite the relatively healthy condition of the watershed, this lake can become turbid and lose its aquatic plants. Another water quality issue has to do with a lightly deeper portion of the lake allowing undesirable fish like carp and bullheads to survive through the winter. Finally, water levels are more likely to be kept stable than in the past because of dams at the outlet and downstream, also reducing the frequency of water level fluctuations and potential for severe winterkills. Lake Management The lake is managed in an effort to keep the lake water clear and growth of aquatic vegetation abundant. Resource managers would prefer to manage Lake Christina through the use of temporary drawdowns to reduce fish numbers, but drawdowns haven't been possible because of the downstream dams and other factors including increased precipitation. Instead, the lake's fish population is managed through the use of chemical treatments to kill off fish along with the installation of fish barriers and water control structures to reduce the reinvasion of fish from nearby waterbodies. The amount of water entering the lake is also managed through the use of water control structures. Today, the DNR, local lake association, Ducks Unlimited and other partners are exploring alternative methods of lake management in an effort to reduce the cost associated with repeated chemical applications. One proposed method is the use of a permanent pump structure to allow for periodic drawdowns of the water level. A Brief History • Prior to the 1950s, this large shallow lake had been one of the most important feeding and staging areas for diving ducks in the Mississippi flyway. It supported lush beds of aquatic plants with clear water. • By 1959, water clarity had suddenly declined with vegetation becoming sparse along with a drop in waterfowl numbers. • In 1965, biologists eliminated part of the fish population using toxaphene as water clarity, macrophytes and duck numbers rebound. • By the mid-1970s, there was another decline in water transparency and vegetation. • In 1977, waterfowl numbers reached a peak of 130,000 before falling to less than 5,000 over the following years. • In autumn of 1987, an aerial spraying of rotenone kills nearly all the fish in the lake. Water clarity increased the next year. • For the next 12 years, waterfowl numbers stay fairly consistent as water clarity gradually declines. Fish populations increase due to the lack of winterkills and increased precipitation. • An aerial treatment of rotenone in the fall of 2003 results in the dramatic increase of waterfowl and other aquatic bird numbers due to the improvement of water clarity and growth of aquatic plants. SHALLOW LAKES CASE STUDY: TOWNER LAKE Towner Lake provides an example of an approach that has focused both on watershed management and in -lake management to improve water quality and wildlife habitat. Towner Lake is located in the Niemackl Watershed set in a rural agricultural landscape in western Minnesota. In the past, local citizens, the Bois de Sioux Watershed District, Grant and Stevens County, US. Fish & Wildlife Service, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the MN DNR have worked together to implement best management practices in the watershed in an effort to improve water quality. Recent management efforts have started to focus on implementing in -lake strategies to further improve water quality and habitat conditions in the area. Management of Towner Lake In the past, Towner Lake had thick stands of bulrush that provided ideal waterfowl habitat. However, due to high abundant carp, these aquatic plants have beenlost. Through an easement with City of Herman and Wildlife Lake Designation, the Department of Natural Resources and Ducks Unlimited were able to install this new outlet structure to allow drawdowns. This area has a flat topography so the outlet structure included a pump to draw the lake down. Periodic drawdowns will reduce carp and bullhead populations and restore aquatic plants in the basin. The initial drawdown was started the summer of 2005. The lake remained dry for nearly two summers to allow emergent vegetation to establish and to reduce the numbers of carp and bullheads in the lake. Towner Lake has refilled and aquatic plants are abundant, water is clear and waterfowl use has increased. Habitat will continue to be monitored and drawdowns may need to be repeated in the future, but for now, Towner remains in good shape, and attention can turn to other basins with poor water quality and habitat in the area. Towner Lab PlwdAbundance wM MW CWlr u ,ee, wm 2W �wr .Secw depth ■F% omn.e. L9 CASE STUDY - FULDA LAKE This shallow lake in Murray County is an example of how citizens, local organizations and government agencies came together to help improve water quality and recreational opportunities. Fulda Lake had been declining since 2001 when a wide range of partners came together to work on solving a water quality problem. The cooperative project replaced a fixed -crest dam with a variable crest structure, installed an electric fish barrier, did a drawdown of the lake level, and treated the water with rotenone to remove fish populations dominated by carp and black bullheads. In addition, the MN DNR restocked game fish. Partners in the project included the MN DNR, MN Department of Transportation, MN Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (LCCMR), Murray County and its county commissioners, City of Fulda, Fulda Fish and Game Club, Deb Peterson family, Fulda lakeshore property owners, Heron Lake Watershed District, North Heron Lake Game Producers, and Ducks Unlimited. FUTURE OF SHALLOW LAKES Shallow lakes are like any other natural resource found in Minnesota. They are under constant threat from a variety of factors including changes in the landscape, climate and hydrology. In order to restore and protect these shallow lakes, it takes the efforts of government agencies, nonprofit organizations, local groups, landowners, recreational users and citizens. We need to remember the importance of shallow lakes and their value to our society. Shallow Lakes can: • Benefit water quality of our rivers and other waterbodies, • Provide natural flood control by storing runoff and slowly releasing the water over time, • Provide habitat and food source for many types of wildlife including waterfowl, amphibians, aquatic insects and other animals, • Attract hunters and wildlife watchers that results in additional revenue for restaurants, motels and other businesses in local communities, • Increase lakeshore property values because of good water quality, and • Develop a scenic value as people enjoy the wildlife, water, vegetation and other natural aspects of shallow lakes. WHAT CAN YOU DO? The most important action is to get involved by learning about shallow lakes. Learn about local efforts to protect this resource and how you can help. Education Learn about shallow lake ecosystems by talking to experts from Minnesota DNR, Ducks Unlimited and other natural resource organizations. Attend the annual Minnesota Shallow Lakes Forum (h!V://www.shallowlakes.info/ held in the spring. Participate in a workshop or training session on shoreline conservation practices while networking with other people interested in restoring and preserving shallow lakes. Shoreline and Watershed Management Practices If you own land along a shallow lake or in its !rvation or best management practices that will benefit water quality. This could be as simple as planting native plants along a shoreline to installing rain gardens to filter runoff from your home. Numerous organizations including Soil and Water Conservation Districts, Watershed Projects and Lake Associations can provide funding and technical assistance. Clean off your Boat and Trailer Invasive species like curly -leaf pondweed, zebra mussels, and other organisms can travel between waterbodies on your boat and trailer. Minnesota State Law requires boaters clean off all plant fragments and other materials from their boat and trailers along with draining all water from the boat before leaving the landing and disposing of unused minnows. Become active in Local Government Planning and zoning rules and actions are mostly handled on the local level. Contact your county courthouse for information on the planning and zoning process. Check out: "A Citizens Guide to Influencing Local Land -Use Decisions" www. minnesotawaters. ore /documents / CIT %20G uid_ ebook.pdf. Developed by MN Waters, this booklet helps citizens make wise decisions. 10 Here are some resources and contacts for &yoae.going to work with shallow lakes or wetlands in MinnesofcC MN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) • In addition to regulating alterations of public waters, the DNR offers technical assistance and grants for improving and restoring shallow lakes. • www.dnr.state.mn.us/index.html MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) • MPCA manages the Citizen Lake Monitoring Program, sets water quality standards for all lakes, and provides funding through a number grant programs. • www.nca.state.mn.us/ MINNESOTA WATERS • This nonprofit organization works with citizens across Minnesota through its lake association and water quality monitoring programs. www Aifinesotawaters.org MN BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES (BWSR) • BWSR works with local government entities including water planners and watershed districts to assist with conservation and education projects. • www.bwsr.state.mn.us/ DUCKS UNLIMITED • As a national conservation organization, Ducks Unlimited works with local groups and government agencies to bring life back to shallow lakes and marshes. • www.ducks.org/ MN CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY •� This chapter provides a communication forum for people working in the fisheries field to help advance scientific management of the state's aquatic resources. • www.mnafs.org/ WATER RESOURCES CENTER at MSUM (WRC) • The WRC gathers, interprets and distributes data of environmental significance to help citizens enhance quality of regional lakes, rivers, wetlands and groundwater. • h!!p://cset.mnsu.edu/wrc/ MN SHALLOW LAKES FORUM • This forum brings together diverse interests in a collaborative setting to inform, educate and provoke positive discourse. It has been held across Minnesota since 2004. • www.shallowlakes.info/ 1 JOHN BUTCHER 6915 Lucy Ridge Lane, Chanhassen, MN 55317 j 612.236.3777 1 johnbutcher518Qgmaii.com August 8, 2018 The Mayor and the City Council City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 To the Attention of: Mayor Denny Laufenburger Councilman Dan Campion Councilman Jerry McDonald Councilwoman Elise Ryan Councilwoman Bethany Tjornham Dear Members of the Chanhassen City Council, First and foremost, let it be known that Julie and I don't oppose responsible and thoughtful development, nor are we asking you to entirely block the proposed Galpin development (aka, the "Prince Property"). Additionally, as Chanhassen residents and Minnesotans who loves our natural resources, we're excited about the idea of adding parkland, walking trails, and green space for public use. That said, we have concerns about the two proposed options put forth by Lennar that we'd like to make known. We'd like to make a personal plea for you to step in and find a solution that protects our lakes and preserves the safety of our neighborhoods. We feel that there must be an option that better considers the most important investment that we can all make: the investment in our natural resources, safety, and quality of life for our children and their children. We understand that there's likely no plan that will satisfy the needs or concerns of everyone, but we believe that compromise can be reached that protects our resources and safety while allowing this land to be monetized and developed. Our most pressing and specific concerns are with the proposed connection of 45 homes to Lucy Ridge Lane. An alternative idea that we'd urge you to consider is to treat the 10 -acre parcel at the north side of the property as an extension of the two existing neighborhoods and NOT to connect to the new proposed development in any other way (see a very rough draft of what this could look like in the attached rendering labeled "Proposal A"). Here are the benefits of this idea: > Connecting the Lake Lucy Ridge (15 homes) to the Ashling Meadows neighborhood would create a neighborhood with consistent lot sizes and home sizes. This plan would still allow for the development of 10 acres and an additional 10-15 homes connected to the existing neighborhoods. All of the current stubs would connect but not to the proposed street on the northern side of the development. > This plan would reduce traffic and preserve safety on Lucy Ridge Lane by not adding 45 homes that will significantly increase traffic on a road that is already stressed in the morning by Ashling Meadows residents. In our neighborhoods traffic is often times headed north to highway 7, not south (via Galpin) to highway 5. We can only assume this is the same traffic flow that we'd see with the additional homes. > Ashling Meadows and the Lake Lucy Ridge neighborhoods are the southernmost border of the Minnetonka School District. The homes south of the 10 -acre parcel, (the rest of the proposed development), are all within District 112. This is likely a tertiary concern, but a consideration nonetheless. Other important considerations: > The people that bought homes in our neighborhood did so in part because they are all custom, unique, and somewhat private. Having a national builder attach 45 smaller homes to this neighborhood would be extremely disappointing. > We should be especially cautious of developing the land on the north side of the property. The grade is steep, it is heavily forested, and while we're not environmental experts we are very familiar with the property as we have walked it regularly. The water flow and soil erosion on this particular part of the land will likely stress the wetlands and lakes. We'd urge the city and Lennar to consider: A: Larger lot sizes and tree preservation for the 10 -acre parcel B: A buffer that preservers the trees on the drastically steep grade on the north side of the property. C: Abandoning the development of anything on the north side of the property other than the separate 10 -acre parcel (we do understand this could potentially reduce the amount of revenue that can be generated from the project, as it is currently proposed). We understand the PUD is "give and get" but we also believe that Lennar can still responsibly develop the homes with a single access point off of Galpin if the city is willing to approve a cul-de-sac longer than 800 feet. 2 Thank you for your consideration and any support you can provide. Please feel free to contact us at any time with questions. Sincerely, John Butcher Proposal A M Julie Butcher Aanenson, Kate From: david senior <davidtsenior@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 7:57 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Cc: Trish Ann Wisell Subject: 7141 Galpin Boulevard Comments & Pictures Attachments: DS -City Development - Aug 2018.pptx Hi Kate - my wife & I bought the property located at 7431 Windmill Drive, Chanhassen just 12 months ago. We love the neighborhood, neighbors and City. The Prince property development as proposed I have concerns about how close the Concept plan comes to the back of all neighbors property lines without any significant tree buffer, and considering the existing wetlands which do not seem to have been correctly considered. Our property gives a unique insight into why this area is so wet as we have a city storm drain in our back yard! I have attached 2 slides that show the back yard & the view of the Prince property from our backyard showing the wetlands & outlet from the storm drain. I understand the desire of the City to expand the parkland, but have to agree with the 2 Planning Commission Council members & many neighbors that had serious reservations on the plan as submitted in the July meeting. I just want to add our voices to that concern as we were on vacation during the last meeting time. I recognize you may not have time to come visit, but we do extend that offer given the gravity of what is being proposed. Best Regards, David & Trish Senior CONCEPT PLAN ISSUES FOR 7141 GALPIN BOULEVARD... THIS IS A CITY STORMDRAIN WHICH WE MAINTAIN AT PERSONAL COST. WITHOUT MAINTENANCE THIS WOULD BE ANOTHER ALGAE & DEBRIS EYESORE. WHILE OUR PROPERTY IS FENCED IN ALL AROUND, THERE IS AN EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY FOR CITY ACCESS TO THE STORM DRAIN WHICH REGULARLY OVERFLOWS INTO THE WETLANDS AT THE BACK. n •��+F 'L . JL or Ul * cc vi'i r-"�. r-«.w,,. - ,• ' , ♦1f 1 r+►,'-'1' .iib-'V . � � � ap � ... ,� 1�',�,;^' ' ,A Ott l Aanenson, Kate From: Laufenburger, Denny Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2018 5:22 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Fwd: 7141 Galpin PUD comments Public comment. Denny Laufenburger Mayor - City of Chanhassen 612-327-6800 iPad Originated Begin forwarded message: From: Tim Nordberg <nord0296aa,email.com> Date: August 9, 2018 at 4:02:20 PM CDT To:<dlaufenburgeraa,ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Re: 7141 Galpin PUD comments Mayor Laufenburger, I wanted to take a minute to express my concerns about the proposals submitted and being reviewed for the 7141 Galpin PUD. I support development in general. I believe it is inevitable, but also good for the City to grow and expand the tax base to improve overall services for everyone. Still, both concepts shown by Lennar clearly favor developer profits over Environmental and Community Impacts. The land being developed has numerous mature trees and wetland areas that would be affected, directly impacting the nearby Lakes' water quality as well as potentially adjacent homeowner lot drainage. Allowing the land to be cleared, filled, and graded as needed by either concept isn't something I support. I hope a compromised concept that includes the following can be found: • Keeping the space closest to the lakes for the City's long term trail plans. Ideally ensuring trail connections have a desirable design, such as working their way through a forest rather than a sidewalk along a densely populated street. • Less density, adjoining neighborhoods seem closer to 0.4-0.5 acre where many of the proposed lots appear nearly 1/3rd this size • Less lot coverage - something reasonable that more closely matches adjoining areas • Required buffers to existing developments, especially along property edges that already contain wetland / forest • Careful considerations of any wetland "management". It may be legally allowed to "replace" some wetland or trees that are removed, but we have to be honest with ourselves and realize that any "replacement" of such natural features is not the same as leaving them untouched. My wife and I brought our family to Chanhassen due to the emphasis and love for Nature, Parks and Recreation and hope that the City will stand behind its commitment to these areas in reviewing large new developments such as being considered on this, currently beautiful and natural portion of the City. I appreciate your careful consideration and further note that I found nearly all opinions shared at the Planning Commissions session to be consistent with my concerns above. Best Regards, Tim Nordberg 2126 Majestic Way, Chanhassen Aanenson, Kate From: Chrissy Boberg <cnboberg@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2018 12:15 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Proposed Development on Galpin Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Completed I am writing in in support of the proposed development of the land off of Galpin. My family and I have lived in Chanhassen for over 10 years and currently live at 1321 Heather Court. We live close to Lake Ann and have enjoyed that and other parks in the area. After looking at the planes it looks like the developer is offering up to the city around 100 of the 188 acres. Of the 100 acres given to the city it appears the plan has the Lake Ann Park expanded to the west side of the lake. We have often visited that park and it would be wonderful to be able to walk almost entirely around the lake with this expansion. It seems very generous and responsible of the developer to offer such a large part of the property to the city to preserve green space for all to use and enjoy. We strongly hope that the city supports this plan at the upcoming meetings. Thank you, Mike Boberg and Family Aanenson, Kate From: Dake Chatfield <dake.chatfield@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 8:02 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Chanhassen Proposed Development Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Hi Kate, My name is Dake Chatfield and I live at 2200 Majestic Way. I am writing about the proposed development going on impacting nearly 200 acres in Chanhassen near my neighborhood. I was at the planning commission meeting in July where there was significant resistance from Chanhassen residents on the proposal. I believe the planning commission even summed up the proposal as "offensive" to the property and environment. I have significant concerns about the impacts to the wetlands, big woods, and recontouring of the land. The proposal from Lennar seems to disregard protecting any of those precious resources. This will no doubt create a long drawn out resistance from the community. I am wondering if there is a compromise solution in the proposal. I've looked at the topographic maps and noticed that there is a significant amount of land on the property that is free of wetland and old growth forest. I can imagine an area like a "U" shape around the previous house on the property that would still allow for significant home development to take place. Lennar may not be able to get the 200 homes they want to build in there, but it looks like they could still get 100 homes in that space. It seems to me that something like that solution would be a good compromise with the builder and the community. Has anything like that been proposed or reviewed? Thanks, Dake Chatfield 952-261-882 ❑ ,. Aanenson, Kate From: Sent: To: Subject: Denny Laufenburger Mayor, Chanhassen 612-327-6800 Begin forwarded message: Laufenburger, Denny Sunday, August 12, 2018 7:23 PM Gerhardt, Todd; Aanenson, Kate Fwd: Proposed Prince Property Project From: Greg Andrews <gpsailandrews(&yahoo.cwm> Date: August 12, 2018 at 6:42:17 PM CDT To:"dlaufenburger(a,ci.chanhassen.mn.us"<dlaufenburgerna.ci.chanhassen.mn.us>, "btiornhom(&,,ci.chanhassen.mn.us"<btiornhomaci.chanhassen.mn.us>, "jmcdonaldC&ci.chanhassen.mn.us"<jmcdonald(&,ci.chanhassen.mn.us>, "ervan(&ci.chanhassen.mn.us" <eryan(d_ci.chanhassen.mn.us>, "dcampion(&ci.chanhassen.mn.us" <dcampion(&,ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Cc: Greg Andrews <Qpsailandrews(a,yahoo.com> Subject: Proposed Prince Property Project Dear Chanhassen City Council, I left a voicemail for most of you last week, but wanted to follow up with an official email as I believe emails get posted to an official record. My name is Greg Andrews and I live at 6895 Ruby Lane in the Ashling Meadows neighborhood. I oppose the project for the following reasons: 1.) The environmental impact that this development could have on Lake Ann. As a Cubscout dad we use Lake Ann for a lot of functions and I do not want to see the water turn into the green muck and weeds of North Lake Lucy due to irresponsible management of this land. Lake Ann is a gem of a lake and we should do everything to preserve it. 2.) The large number of homes in this proposed development that would join up with Ashling Meadows and Lake Lucy Ridge. I have two young children who ride bikes in our neighborhood and I feel that they are safe it they obey the rules. I would not feel safe knowing that our street would become a major route to get to Hwy 7 and Powers Blvd for 90 or more families. I would ask if you all could slow the process down to listen to those who just found out about this project. I believe that others like me just received the official post card notification on August 8th or 9th. Thank you for your consideration of this message. Greg Andrews �)c '�)-c� � '?� - t�- CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on August 7, 2018, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) concept review for property located at 7141 Galpin Boulevard and zoned Rural Residential District (RR), to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and s this day of 4jMMMeulsen, D ty Clerk to before me #"A N M. STE""'G2018. Notary Public-Minnesotay Co=mm=o=n E�.kn 31, 901= Notice of Concept Plan Submittal Notice of Concept Plan Submittal Chanhassen City Council Meeting Chanhassen City Council Meeting Monday, August 13, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. This item may Date & Time: not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Plan Proposal: Review Applicant: U.S. Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar Property 7141 Galpin Boulevard Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this notice is to inform you about the applicant's request. During the City Council meeting, the Mayor will lead the public through the following What steps: Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. City Council discussion. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2018-12. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson by email at phone at 952-227-1139 or Questions & by email at kaanenson(d).ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to Comments: have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the City Council. The staff report for this item will be available on the city's website by 3:00 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2018 at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/agendas. Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! Monday, August 13, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. This item may Date & Time: not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Plan Proposal: Review Applicant: U.S. Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar Property 7141 Galpin Boulevard Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this notice is to inform you about the applicant's request. During the City Council meeting, the Mayor will lead the public through the following What steps: Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. City Council discussion. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2018-12. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson by email at phone at 952-227-1139 or Questions & by email at kaanensonCa-)ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to Comments: have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the City Council. The staff report for this item will be available on the city's website by 3:00 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2018 at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/agendas. Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! ALLAN R & MARY J OLSON ANDREWS FAMILY TRUST ANGELO 1 & CARA L GALIOTO 7461 WINDMILL DR 6895 RUBY LN 1805 EMERALD LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9366 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7592 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7596 ANTHONY R HICKS ASHLING MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS BARRY G & JENNIFER 1 FRIENDS 6910 RUBY LN 16305 36TH AVE N SUITE 600 PO BOX 396 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7595 PLYMOUTH MN 55446-4270 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-0396 BENJAMIN D CURTIS BLAKE M & TAMI C GOTTSCHALK BRIAN C & DONNA M STRAUSS 1949 TOPAZ DR 2197 MAJESTIC WAY 6840 LUCY RIDGE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317- CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9355 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7597 BRIAN L LAROCHE BRIAN M LARAMY BRIAN M SCHLICHTER 1880 TOPAZ DR 7471 TULIP CT 1750 LUCY RIDGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7662 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9330 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7661 CARVER COUNTY CHARLES PETERSON CHERREE R THEISEN 602 4TH ST E 7496 CROCUS CT 2072 MAJESTIC WAY CHASKA MN 55318-2102 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9351 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9352 DAGMAR DIETHELM REV INTER TRUST DAKE N & DEIRDRA CHATFIELD DAVID G & MAUREEN NELSON 2085 MAJESTIC WAY 2200 MAJESTIC WAY 6885 SAPPHIRE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9356 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9354 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7591 DAVID K WEIBY DAVID KOELLN DAVID SENIOR 2149 MAJESTIC WAY 2133 MAJESTIC WAY 7431 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9355 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9355 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9366 DENNIS 0 & CYNTHIA A DUBOIS ECKANKAR EDNA VASSILOVSKI 6865 SAPPHIRE LN PO BOX 2000 273 MAIN ST CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7591 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-2000 WAYLAND MA 01778-4525 ENRIQUE F & SUSAN MALARET ERIC S & LISA M HAMBORG GERARD W MAHER 6965 LAKE HARRISON CIR 1861 TOPAZ DR 7101 UTICA LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4625 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7662 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9528 GILK 1T REV TRUST GREG MCGUIRK GREGORY BLAUFUSS 6890 RUBY LN 1770 LUCY RIDGE CT 7116 UTICA LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7592 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7661 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9528 GREGORY R STEWART HSIN-HUNG HUANG HUGH REVOCABLE TRUST 1893 TOPAZ DR 2045 MAJESTIC WAY 7441 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317- CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9356 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9366 JAMES A & LESA W BOETTCHER JAMES A FREEBERSYSER JAMES W & CYNTHIA A ROSENDAHL 7476 CROCUS CT 6935 RUBY LN 7090 TECUMSEH LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9351 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7595 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8330 JAY R & ANN MARIE GERCZAK JEFF CANNON JEFFREY 1 & STACEY 1 MORKEN 1941 TOPAZ DR 1810 EMERALD LN 6945 RUBY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7596 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7595 JEFFREY S & CRISTIN L MASCHKA JEROLD R CLAIR JOAN E WEIS 2086 MAJESTIC WAY 7460 WINDMILL DR 2101 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9352 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9362 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9355 JOCELYN 1 O'BRIEN JODI LV LANNOM INTERVIVOS REV TRUST JOEL W & SUSAN M REIMERS 2198 BRINKER ST 6920 RUBY LN 7495 CROCUS CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9359 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7595 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9351 JOHN C & CARRIE M TIETZ LIV TRUSTS JOHN D & CAROL A P PITZ JOHN E ELVECROG 7011 GALPIN BLVD 2117 MAJESTIC WAY 7411 FAWN HILL RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8026 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9355 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8430 JOHN 1 BUTCHER JOHN 1 O'BRIEN III JON & MARY BETH HEBEISEN 1T REV TRST 6915 LUCY RIDGE LN 6870 RUBY LN 2150 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7661 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7592 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9353 JONATHAN D HENDRICKS JOSE L MARRUJO JOSHUA KIMBER 6885 RUBY LN 1973 TOPAZ DR 2060 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7592 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9352 KENNETH LEER KEVIN 1 SUNDEM KOEN GERARDUS PETRUS BAARS 2181 MAJESTIC WAY 1845 TOPAZ DR 1795 LUCY RIDGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9355 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7662 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7661 KRISTIN S LENK REV TRUST KURT T & ALISON E L SCHINI LAKE LUCY RDG HOMEOWNERS ASSN 6895 LUCY RIDGE LN 6875 SAPPHIRE LN 8315 PLEASANT VIEW DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7598 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7591 MOUNDS VIEWN MN 55112-6139 MARK A& JACQUELINE D PHILLIPS REV MARK E & JULI A GEMPLER MARK S & GERI S RADKE TRUST 1760 LUCY RIDGE CT 1877 TOPAZ DR 1989 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN GE 55317-7661 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7662 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 MARK SEEFELDT MATTHEW & MICHELLE N MYERS MATTHEW RAU 7470 TULIP CT 7421 WINDMILL DR 6925 RUBY LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9330 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9366 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7595 MAURICIO FERREIRA DE GOES MEHDI AYOUCHE MICHAEL BURRIS 6930 RUBY LN 2102 MAJESTIC WAY 7451 WINDMILL DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7595 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9353 CHANHASSEN MN 55317- MICHAELI GORRA MICHAEL L & KRESSIN B KRAUSE TRUSTS MICHAEL WESCHE PO BOX 9798 7050 UTICA LN 7475 CROCUS CT FARGO ND 58106- CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9214 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9351 PAISLEY PARK ENTERPRISES INC PAUL A SJOGREN PAUL D JOHNSON PO BOX 8265 7490 TULIP CT 2174 MAJESTIC WAY WICHITA FALLS TX 76307-8265 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9330 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9353 PAUL M ENGEBRETSON PER ULFSON & MOLLY M LAGERBACK PETER 1 & LYNN M POLINGO 7050 TECUMSEH LN 6875 LUCY RIDGE LN 1981 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8330 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7598 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 RICHARD A SIT ROBERT 1 RAJALINGAM ROGER J & SALLY A HAMM 1957 TOPAZ DR 1909 TOPAZ DR 2180 BRINKER ST CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9359 ROSE -MARIE J ANDERSON SCOTT E & TAMARA G SATHER SENGTAVANH B & MARIO S MEAS 7210 GALPIN BLVD 7090 UTICA LN 7440 WINDMILL DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331- CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9214 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9362 SHANE D WASKEY STEPHEN M BARNES STEVEN P WALLACE 1925 TOPAZ DR 7100 UTICA LN 6900 LUCY RIDGE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9528 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7599 STUART K AMATEAU STUART REID THOMAS F & NANCY L HAUSER 6915 RUBY LN 7423 FAWN HILL RD 1920 TOPAZ DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7595 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8430 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 THOMAS P & ANGELA D VUKOVICH TIMOTHY NORDBERG TODD M SIMNING 1965 TOPAZ DR 2126 MAJESTIC WAY 2145 WYNSONG LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9353 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4841 TRENT MAHR TREVOR A ST JOHN TYLER N TREAT 2065 MAJESTIC WAY 1900 TOPAZ DR 2148 WYNSONG LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9356 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7593 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4841 WILLIAM & LISA ROTHSCHILD WILLIAM H THOMPSON WILLIAM K & KRISTINE GUGGEMOS 6860 LUCY RIDGE LN 7491 TULIP CT 2165 MAJESTIC WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7597 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9330 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9355 PAUL A & AMY C HOLLIS ROBERT LESTER SHEEHAN LE THU CA 2221 HUNTER DR 2199 RED FOX CIR 7319 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PATRICK DOUGLAS SIMMONS ELIZABETH BARNES JONATHAN R SEPTER 7055 NORTHWOOD CT 2179 RED FOX CIR 2188 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRIAN & ANNALISA SAWTELL PETER JOHN GARBERG NATHAN DEKAM 7184 FAWN HILL RD 7075 NORTHWOOD CT 2231 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TODD A & SITYLA S ALLARD BRIAN 1 & BARBARA A KNUDSON LONGACRES HOMEOWNERS ASSN INC 7168 FAWN HILL RD 7312 FAWN HILL RD PO BOX 542 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KEVIN F & GRETA C WARREN MATTHEW CHAMBERS MICHAEL F DANES 4930 GREEN FARMS CIR 2169 RED FOX CIR 7074 NORTHWOOD CT MINNEAPOLIS MN 55436 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SWALLOWTAIL VENTURES-CHANHASSEN JEFFREY S & LAURI K WAGAMAN ROBERT C & KRISTINE R COSGROVE LLC PO BOX 336 2165 LONGACRES DR 7187 FAWN HILI RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SCOTT HACE STEVEN P & JODY K BUSKA DARYOUSH GOLBAN 7242 FAWN HILL RD 7054 NORTHWOOD CT 2232 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEPHEN M & RENEE L PAWLYSITYN LARRY 1 & YOKO N STUEVE THEODORE E & BRENDA L DARKOW 7266 FAWN HILL RD 7324 FAWN HILL RD 2198 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 THOMAS V & CECELIA M HORSTMAN TODD M & KAREN T BIMBERG DANIEL P & KATHRYN 1 O'CONNOR 7163 FAWN HILL RD 7275 FAWN HILL RD 7124 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID B ERICKSON BERCH CAPITAL LLC BRADLEY G & ALISA L LACOMY 7095 NORTHWOOD CT 261 SCHOOL AVE #240 7301 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHARLES E LOEFFLER II SHAWN YOU TIMOTHY C STEWART 7327 FAWN HILL RD 7263 FAWN HILL RD 7287 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PAUL J & LYNNETTE A OLSON BRUCE A & JERILYN M KRAFT TODD N & ANNE B JUTTING 2189 RED FOX CIR 7094 NORTHWOOD CT 7311 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 WADE OSBORNE SUSAN M LOMBARDO REV TRUST MICHAEL D & JANE E FELMLEE 7175 FAWN HILL RD 7278 FAWN HILL RD 7336 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DAVID A EICKMEYER REV TRUST SCOTT CARL & KATHRYN M WOSJE DAVID D KOESTER 7339 FAWN HILL RD 7125 NORTHWOOD CT 7290 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KARL D & DIANNE M DEAN MARTIN ZIELINSKI REV TRUST ANDREW WERNER 2251 HUNTER DR 2211 HUNTER DR 2241 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK R & TANYA L ERICKSON CHRISTOPHER ANDRIS KAULS 2216 HUNTER DR 7254 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRIAN & DONNA STRAUSS phone: 952.474.6235 fax: 952.474.6237 6840 Lucy Ridge Lane cell: 310.743.4684 (Brian) Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 cell: 952.412.6011 (Donna) e-mail: briancstrauss@me.com (Brian) e-mail: donnamstrauss@me.com (Donna) July 29, 2018 The Mayor & The City Council City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 To The Attention Of. Mayor Denny Laufenburger (dlaufenburger@ci.chanhassen.mn.us) Councilwoman Bethany Tjornhom (btjornhom@ci.chanhassen.mn.us) Councilman Jerry McDonald (jmcdonald@ci.chanhassen.mn.us) Councilwoman Elise Ryan (eryan@ci.chanhassen.mn.us) Councilman Dan Campion (dcampion@ci.chanhassen.mn.us) Subject. Galpin Boulevard Property Development Dear Mayor & Councilmembers, Delivered By Email We respectfully submit to you our concerns as residents of Chanhassen in connection with the proposed development of the land between Powers Boulevard and Galpin Boulevard — more commonly referred to as the "Prince Property". We have resided at our current address since 2004 which is part of the Lake Lucy Ridge neighborhood; our neighborhood borders the northern most edge of the continuous parcels of land being proposed for development. To be very clear, we respect the property rights of all landowners, and do not oppose the estate of Prince R. Nelson from monetizing those land assets. However, as proposed, the concepts are offensive to us, and we suspect they are, and will continue to be, offensive to many other Chanhassen residents — particularly those in close proximity to the proposed development. We note that this matter is on the tentative agenda for the August 13, 2018 Chanhassen City Council Meeting. We request that, if the current concepts come in front of you for approval, you vote them down outright. The contents herein outline some of our more pertinent objections and provide other additional commentary. Disclaimer Of Expertise We disclaim here certain areas of expertise. By way of background, our education and professional experiences are in business and general business management. We are not experts in conservation, environmental matters, water quality, water runoff, wetlands, or watershed management. We are not arborists, forestry experts, or experts in flora or fauna. We are not zoning experts, land surveyors, property developers, or land use experts/land use attorneys. We are not experts in local governmental procedures or experts in the relevant laws of the State of Minnesota. That all notwithstanding, we have begun to put a fair amount of personal time into researching issues around this very concerning matter. The Mayor & City Council - City of Chanhassen July 29, 2018 Page 1 Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Of July 17, 2018 Unfortunately, neither of us could attend the Planning Commission Meeting of July 17, 2018. We did, however, provide a written letter (see Appendix 1) to the Commission in advance of that meeting; you all were copied on our letter as well. While we were unable to attend in person, we have watched the meeting via the on-line recording. Certain elements of that meeting raise concerns and bear mentioning here: 1. This process may already be in non-conformance with Minnesota state law. Minnesota statute 394.26 governs "public hearings" (see Appendix 2). It states in part "Written notice of public hearings regarding the application of official controls to specific properties, including but not limited to conditional uses, variances, interim uses, zoning regulations, and subdivision regulations, shall be sent to all property owners of record within 500 feet of the affected property in incorporated areas." The City of Chanhassen is an incorporated area. Please note that in the "Affidavit Of Mailing Notice" (see Appendix 3) associated with the July 17, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting, it is clear that no notice was made to certain addresses on at least: a) Majestic Way, b) Topaz Drive, c) Emerald Lane, or, d) Lucy Ridge Lane — addresses which would be included in the "within 500 feet" requirement of the statute given that certain residents on those streets actually border the property in question. That's before we even get the tape measure out to accommodate a full 500 feet. 2. All, or virtually all, of the Chanhassen residents who submitted advance written comments or spoke at the July 17, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting did so in strong opposition to the proposed concepts as currently contemplated. We share many of those objections, and will lay those out in this letter. 3. One long-time city resident rightly noted that when the Lake Lucy Ridge neighborhood (our neighborhood) was developed in the early 2000's, concerned neighboring residents had an opportunity to comment — which led to the developer (Noecker Development, LLC) making substantial and accommodating changes. We are hopeful the same will hold true here. 4. When speaking to the issue of connecting the development to the northern neighborhoods, Joe Jablonski, Director of Land at Lennar stated something to the effect of "the dead end streets to the north likely are marked with signs stating future road connection possible" and "at the direction of city staff, at least at this point, we have connected the roads". Two points bear mentioning in response to those comments by Mr. Jablonski. First, Lucy Ridge Lane does not, and has not had, such a sign. Second, it is somewhat concerning to us that city staff is apparently down a path of directing the developer on street connections. However, we would also argue that it can be inferred in Mr. Jablonski's statement that streets to the north do not need to be connected for development to be viable. S. Also noteworthy is Mr. Jablonski's statement of Lennar admitting that the property has "dramatic topography" and "a fair amount of dirt will need to be moved". 6. At the conclusion of the July 17, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting, certain commissioners offered brief comments and opinions: a. Concern over destruction to natural resources. b. Opposition to large houses on small lots. c. Opposition to 35% lot coverage and increasing lot coverage above 25%. d. This property is a natural resource that can't be duplicated. e. The concepts do not respect the land and will require massive grading and massive tree clear cutting. f. The proposed new road to the north is difficult to envision given topographical constraints. g. Less is more in this case. h. Finding an "Option C" that serves all is preferred and should be expected. The Mayor & City Council - City of Chanhassen July 29, 2018 Page 3 Our Objections To The Concepts Being Contemplated In the event the concepts are presented to you in substantially their current form, we would request that you vote them down for at least these reasons: Environmental The current concepts will harm the environment beyond repair. These things should be considered: • Disturbance To Wetlands. The property is covered with natural wetlands. Overdevelopment like the type currently contemplated would see unacceptable destruction to those wetlands. • Disturbance To Lake Lucy, And All Downstream Bodies Of Water Including Lake Ann. As is well known, Lake Lucy sits on top of the watershed and feeds Lake Ann and subsequent bodies of water. And it is well understood by the City that the health of these lakes is paramount to our community. On the City of Chanhassen's own webpage, Lake Ann is described as having good water quality and low phosphorous. However, perhaps what is less know outside of the surrounding neighbors of Lake Lucy, is the substantial damage already caused to Lake Lucy through recent development. We are referring to the nearby neighborhood currently being constructed at the northwest corner of Lake Lucy Road and Yosemite Avenue — Anthem On Park (see Appendix 4). During 2016, the City of Chanhassen approved the rezoning of this property from Rural Residential District (RR) to Single -Family Residential District (RSF) to accommodate this 12 -lot subdivision. Two full years later the property has changed hands between builders, only one home has partially been constructed, and the water quality of Lake Lucy has suffered tremendously. All residents in at least our neighborhood have been appalled at witnessing the serious degradation of water quality, and the enormous amounts of algae and invasive growth, which has recently developed in Lake Lucy. These devastating effects are the direct result of runoff from Anthem On Park traveling across/under Lake Lucy Road, and directly into Lake Lucy. It should be noted that at least one of the current concepts being contemplated calls for just this same type of rezoning, only on a much more massive scale, and physically much closer to both Lake Lucy and Lake Ann. • Massive Clear -Cutting & The Dramatic Removal Of "Big Woods". As you likely know, "Big Woods" refers to a type of forest of hardwoods found in parts of Wisconsin and Minnesota. They take decades and centuries to grow and conservation is key to their preservation. The proposals contemplated will result in massive clear cutting of these types of trees. At the densities contemplated, the resulting topography will be more akin to prairie land, as opposed to the existing beautiful forest we all enjoy. • Sizable Earth Moving & Massive Re -Contouring Of The Land. By Mr. Jablonski's own admission at the July 17, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting, the property has "dramatic topography". Combining that with the densities being contemplated will only result in a permanent scaring of that property and the environment. Buffers Construction Traffic Additional Traffic/Connection Points • Buffers Are Too Small. The buffers between what is being proposed, and the surrounding neighborhoods appear to be non-existent. • Construction Traffic Will Be Unbearable. This development as contemplated, involves approximately 200 homes. This will add massive construction traffic to the surrounding neighborhoods for years. And, as currently contemplated, it will open up new lanes to the north for that construction traffic to flow — directly into, and through, the Lake Lucy Ridge neighborhood, and, to a lesser degree, the Ashling Meadows neighborhood. • Additional Traffic/Connection Points. Similar to the issue of construction traffic, opening up permanent outlets to the north will overburden the Lake Lucy Ridge neighborhood and the Ashling Meadows neighborhood with new, and dramatically increased traffic. This is clearly a safety concern. The Mayor & City Council - City of Chanhassen luly 29, 2018 page 4 Connecting The Proposed Development To The North Is Inconsistent With The Lake Lucy Ridge Neighborhood Lake Lucy Ridge Was Not A Tract Home Developed Neighborhood. Unlike the proposed concepts, our neighborhood was not developed in tract home fashion (see Appendix 5). Owners purchased lots, selected customer builders, and, complying with a light set of neighborhood covenants, built custom homes. Those qualities were desirable to the homeowners and a market need was met. However, extending our neighborhood into the proposed development is concerning from an aesthetics, lot size, and economic perspective. Concerns Over Governance/The Possibility Of An Inappropriate "Quid Pro Quo" Between City & Developer Notwithstanding the previously cited matter of the "Affidavit Of Mailing Notice", we have these additional concerns: • Overreliance On A Comprehensive Plan. The city seems too reliant on Comprehensive Plan as a guidepost. For a document that is now many years old, and one that, when crafted, likely did not allow the citizenry to fully connect the dots with "what could really happen under this plan", it seems to bear too much weight. Further, this Comprehensive Plan was crafted well after certain residents bought into their homes; in other words, it's a massive curveball after the fact. • Is There Already A Quid Pro Quo? The proposed concepts (see Appendix 6 for "Yield Plan" and Appendix 7 for "Density Transfer Plan") screams of a wink -and -a -nod deal already in place between the City of Chanhassen and Lennar. It screams to us ..... we (the developer) are going to drop in 200 houses with minimal need for variances in the "Yield Plan", but if you approve the more aggressive variances with the "Density Transfer Plan" we will give you your park — not withstanding that this jams overaggressive development to the west and overly burdens those surrounding neighborhoods. • Why Did The City Of Chanhassen Not Enter The Marketplace And Compete To Procure Land For Parks Like Any Other Person Or Entity? If The City Of Chanhassen wanted a park extension on the east side of the property, why did the City not approach the land owner and procure that land through the normal marketplace and normal governmental budgeting and expenditure avenues? Instead, as contemplated, the City is obtaining its park on the financial and quality of life backs of the western neighborhoods. • There May Be A Rush To Development Now At A Tipping Point With Chanhassen Residents. In 2017 it appears to us that there was a groundswell of massive opposition to the city center development of the retail and apartment complex (see Appendix 8 and Appendix 9) now under construction. Nevertheless, the City Council moved forward with 3 to 2 vote of approval. This is concerning to us as it is indicative of a city counsel whose majority may be out of touch with the views of the residents of Chanhassen. Other Matters For Consideration/Recommendation For Rejection • Lennar Does Not Appear To Own The Land. It appears that, given Mr. Jablonski s comments at the July 17, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting, Lennar does not currently own the land. We would speculate they have purchased an option on the land at a de minimis fee for a fixed duration of time. • The Burden On An Acceptable Concept Does Not Fall With The City Of Chanhassen, Or Neighboring Residents. It resides firmly with the developer, and if they can't come forward with an acceptable plan, their recourse is to simply let their option on the land expire and move on — and the City Council is within its right to reject either of these concepts as contemplated. • If The Concepts As Proposed Come To The City Council, You Should Vote Them Down Outright. For at least all the reasons cited herein. The Mayor & City Council - City of Chanhassen IuIY 29, 2018 Page 5 What Would Be Acceptable To Us, & Likely The Surrounding Neighbors Again, the burden on landing on a concept which is feasible does not fall upon us. Nevertheless, let us outline here what would be acceptable development for the property in question: Overall • Environmental guideposts must be established for the protection of the watershed, Lake Lucy, and Lake Ann. Development should be further buffered from these wetlands and lakes from what is currently contemplated. • The property should be developed with more reasonable density, larger lot sizes, and improved lot coverage ratios which are all meaningfully different from the proposed concepts. This will be more aesthetically pleasing, but, more importantly, it preserves more of the trees than currently contemplated. • The new development should only be accessed via Galpin Road, and not connected to the northern established neighborhoods. • Substantially wider buffers of substance including trees and other natural dividers should be utilized between the proposed development and the northern neighborhoods and the southern neighborhoods. Specific To the North & Connections With Lake Lucy Ridge & Ashling Meadows • As you know, the property is a series of continuous tax parcels. Parcel #25.6900030 (see Appendix 10), the northern most parcel, is of particular interest to us and, we suspect, to many of our neighbors in the northern bordering area. We would like to see this parcel developed separately (see Appendix 11 for an illustrative example — concept only). • This parcel should be developed only as an extension of the Lake Lucy Ridge neighborhood consistent with custom homes, lot sizes, and aesthetics of the current neighborhood. We have our own neighborhood association duly on file with Carver County which is inclusive of reasonable building covenants, and it is not unrealistic to think that our neighborhood association would be willing to annex these homes into our association. Lennar could develop parcel #25.6900030 in such a fashion, or they could sell that parcel to another builder or developer who could do the same. This method of development of parcel 25.6900030 would be an ideal solution for certain issues raised in the northern neighborhoods. • We do, however, recognize not connecting that parcel leaves concerns over the length of a 'one outlet" cul-de-sac for the developer in the northern section outside of parcel #25.6900030. However, if developed within the overall suggestions raised here, perhaps that becomes a small cul-de-sac with larger lots, more trees, and a wider northern buffer, all of which could satisfy a very narrow variance if needed. Again, we stand in strong opposition to this proposed development as currently contemplated. That said, we believe there are options for development that work for all parties. Thank you for your consideration. Please feel free to contact us with any questions. Sincerely, Brian C. Strauss Donna M. Strauss The Mayor & City Council - City of Chanhassen July 29, 2018 Page 6 With Copies To: Note To City of Chanhassen_ Please refrain from publishing this copy _list to any public docket or record --------------- - - - - - Note To Media:- Please refrain from publishing any materials in this copy list - - - - - ------ ----------------- City Of Chanhassen 1. Andrew Aller Planning Commission 2. Nancy Madsen (by mail): 3. Michael McGonagill 4. Mark Randall S. John Tietz 6. Mark Undestad 7. Steven Weick----------------- ----- ------------------------------------------------- Lake Lucy Ridge 8. -------------------------------------------------------------- Debbie & Gordon Medeiros - 6820 Lucy Ridge Lane Homeowners (medeiros45@me.com, medeirosl3@me.com) (by email): 9. Lisa & Bill Rothschild - 6860 Lucy Ridge Lane (bill.rothschild8@icloud.com, (mnb.schlichter@mchsi.com) blrothschild@gmail.com) 10. Jeff & Sarah Cannon - 1810 Emerald Lane (jeffjcannon@gmail.com, sarahanncannon@ hotmail.com) 11. Cara & Angelo Galioto - 1805 Emerald Lane (c_galioto@hotmail.com, aga lioto@ lockton.com) 12. Karin & Steve Wallace - 6900 Lucy Ridge Lane (khirschey@hotmail.com, Carey & Doff Lohrenz - 1780 Lucy Ridge Court (ffodcbou@aol.com, spwallace@hotmail.com) 13. Jennifer & Barry Friends - 6935 Lucy Ridge Lane (jenniferjfriends@gmail.com, barryfriends@gmail.com) 14. John & Julie Butcher - 6915 Lucy Ridge Lane (jbutcher518@gmail.com, johnbutcher518@gmail.com) 15. Kris & Andy Lenk - 6895 Lucy Ridge Lane (k.lenk@msn.com, alenk@vardeeurope.com) 16. Molly & Per Lagerback - 6875 Lucy Ridge Lane (mmlagerback@gmail.com, lagerback@gmail.com) 17. Koen Baars & Hilke Snels —1795 Lucy Ridge Court (hilkesnels@hotmail.com) 18. Michelle & Brian Schlichter - 1750 Lucy Ridge Court (mnb.schlichter@mchsi.com) 19. Jacquie &Mark Phillips - 1760 Lucy Ridge Court (markjacq@yahoo.com) 20. Meredith & Greg McGuirk - 1770 Lucy Ridge Court (meremcguirk@gmail.com, gomcguirk@gmail.com) 21. Carey & Doff Lohrenz - 1780 Lucy Ridge Court (ffodcbou@aol.com, badgerfl4@aol.com) 22. Jeff Neichin & Chris Capko 1790 Lucy Ridge Court (capkoc@aol.com) _ - Ashling Meadows ---------------------------------------------- 23. Greg Stewart1893 Topaz Drive (grstewart77@gmail.com) Contact Person (by -------------------------------------- -email)- - -: - ----------------------------------------------------- Majestic Way 24. ------------------------------------ Dake Chatfield — 2200 Majestic Way (dake.chatfield@gmail.com) Contact Person (by email): Media 25. Liz Sawyer - Reporter & General Assignment Reporter, Star Tribune (by email): (liz.sawyer@startribune.com) 26. Mark Olsen — Community Editor, Chanhassen Villager (editor@chanvillager.com) APPENDIX 1 BRIAN & DONNA STRAUSS phone: 952.474.6235 fax: 952.474.6237 6840 Lucy Ridge Lane cell: 310.743.4684 (Brian) Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 cell: 952.412.6011 (Donna) e-mail: briancstrauss@me.com (Brian) e-mail: donnamstrauss@me.com (Donna) July 4, 2018 Planning Commission City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attention: Andrew Aller, Steven Weick, Mark Randall, Mark Undestad, John Tietz, Nancy Madsen, Michael McGonagill Sub ed: Galpin Property - Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Review Planning Commission Members, We are residents of Chanhassen and have resided at our above address since 2004. We live in Lake Lucy Ridge, the neighborhood directly north of the Chanhassen parcels of land commonly referred to as the "Prince Property". Regarding that property, we see that during the July 17, 2018 Chanhassen Planning Commission meeting, you will be taking up a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Review. While one of us will endeavor to attend that meeting, we write to you today to register our strongest possible opposition to that proposed development. We cannot emphasize our opposition to this project enough; and please note that in our 14 years as residents of Chanhassen, this is the first stance we have taken in opposition to any development in our city. We oppose this development for at least these reasons: 1. Environmental. The proposed development is overly disruptive to the environment. As you know, there are wetlands on and around the property which need to be managed with care. This development will certainly harm the wetlands, both during construction as well as after construction. Additionally, we would imagine that hundreds of trees will need to be removed from the parcels in question. 2. Duration Of Construction. To accommodate approximately 200 new homes, our community will be burdened by construction activity for many, many years. Of note, we have a small development going in near us on the corner of Lake Lucy Road and Yosemite Avenue. That small neighborhood alone will likely take 2-3 years to complete at the current pace. 3. Congestion To The Surrounding Neighborhoods. This is not a small development being proposed. This is a massive, approximately 200 lot development and it will leave the area overly congested. 4. Traffic & Traffic Flow. The proposed development will add exorbitant traffic to the broader area. Additionally, and importantly, our neighborhood (Lake Lucy Ridge), and the existing neighborhood to the west of us (Ashling Meadows), will bear the brunt of this additional traffic, as the proposed development calls for the opening and continuation of existing dead ended streets into the proposed development. Planning Commission - City of Chanhassen July 7, 2018 2 5. Proposed Housing Styles/Declining Property Value. After a review of Lenar's presentation materials, it appears the houses being proposed for the site are of sizes and types that will lower housing values for existing neighboring homeowners. Additionally, the massive scale of approximately 200 new homes coming to market will depress housing value meaningfully. Of note, housing values are just now coming back to pricing levels seen in the early 2000's, when much of the current housing stock in the surrounding area was built. 6. Alternatives Are Available & Have Not Been Explored. Based on our review of the Application For Development Review as posted on the City of Chanhassen website (which is not signed by the property owner), as well our review of property records on the Carver County Property Information website, it appears Prince R. Nelson (and we would assume, now, his estate) is still the taxpayer of record for the parcels. Given the property has not yet been sold, it remains that there are a multitude of development alternatives available - alternatives which are more equitable to all stakeholders in the community including the property rights of the current property owner. At least these options are available: a. Having the City of Chanhassen acquire the land, or a portion of the land for communal property benefits, and to preserve the environment. b. In keeping with the current zoning of the parcels, develop the land with larger lot sizes which will reduce the density of housing and lower the adverse impacts as previously discussed. c. The land is a continuous piece of property made up of various parcels. Parcel #25.6900030 is of particular interest to us and, we suspect, to many of our neighbors in the northern bordering area. This parcel, if it was "broken off and sold separately' could be developed in a fashion in keeping with the current zoning, and in a manner which would not require streets breaking through to the balance of the southern parcels in question. The significant benefit to that would be to minimize undue disruption to our neighborhood (Lake Lucy Ridge) and the neighborhood to the west of us (Ashling Meadows), the two existing neighborhoods which would be most adversely affected. I can assure you there would likely be a buyer for that parcel as a standalone parcel. 7. A Zoning Change Is Required. It appears the proposed development will require a zoning change to accommodate this development. Again, we stand in strong opposition to this proposed development and encourage you, as the Planning Commission, to reject it in it's current form, using all avenues and procedures available. There are a plethora of alternatives that offer greater benefit to all stakeholders, including the property rights of the current property owner. Sincerely, Brian C. Strauss Donna M. Strauss APPENDIX 2 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2017 394.26 394.26 PUBLIC HEARINGS. Subdivision 1. [Repealed, 1974 c 571 s 51j Subd. la. When required. In addition to public hearings required by section 375.51 prior to the adoption by ordinance of any comprehensive plan or amendments thereto or of any official control or amendment thereto, public hearings shall be held before any conditional use permit, interim use permit, variance, or proposal for a subdivision is approved or denied by the responsible authority, and in circumstances where a public hearing is otherwise required by sections 394.21 to 394.37. Such public hearings may be continued from time to time and additional hearings may be held. Subd. 2. Notice. Notice of the time, place, and purpose of any public hearing shall be given by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the town, municipality, or other area concerned, and in the official newspaper of the county, at least ten days before the hearing, except that notice of public hearings in connection with the adoption by ordinance of any comprehensive plan or amendments thereto or adoption or amendment of any official controls shall be given in the manner provided by section 375.5 1, subdivision 2. In addition to the requirements of section 375.5 1, subdivision 2, written notice of public hearings on all official controls and amendments thereto shall be sent to the governing bodies of all towns and all municipalities located within the county. Written notice of public hearings regarding the application of official controls to specific properties, including but not limited to conditional uses, variances, interim uses, zoning regulations, and subdivision regulations, shall be sent to all property owners of record within 500 feet of the affected property in incorporated areas. In unincorporated areas, the written notice shall be sent to property owners as follows: (a) in the case of variances, to owners of record within 500 feet of the affected property; (b) in the case of conditional uses and interim uses, to owners of record within one-quarter mile of the affected property or to the ten properties nearest to the affected property, whichever would provide notice to the greatest number of owners; (c) in the case of all other official controls, including but not limited to zoning regulations and subdivision regulations, to owners of record within one-half mile of the affected property. Written notice shall also be given to the affected board of town supervisors, and the municipal council of any municipality within two miles of the affected property. Subd. 3. [Repealed, 1974 c 571 s 51 ] Subd. 3a. Who runs hearing. The board may assign responsibility to conduct public hearings for one or more purposes to the planning commission, board of adjustment or any official or employee of the county, except as provided in section 375.51. History: 1959 c 559 s 6; 1963 c 691 s 4; 1974 c 571 s 20-22; 1976 c 177 s 1; 1980 c 477 s 1; 2008 c 331 s 4 Copyright 00 2017 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. APPENDIX 3 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on July 5, 2018, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of an application for a Planned Unit Development concept review for property located at 7141 Galpin Boulevard and zoned Rural Residential District (RR). Applicant/Owner: Lennar, to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this —,I- day of ui 12018. -4 Ili'1l1� 1�1�flf,iary Public Kim T. a sen, Depu C JENNIFER ANN POTTER Notary pudbMtrvlaeota ,,1y Commwww E*kM Jn 91,1010 TAX NAME TAX ADD TAX _ADD_L3 BERCH CAPITAL LLC AVE #240 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-2067 BRADLEY G & ALISA L LACOMY HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8429 BRIAN & ANNALISA SAWTELL MAXADD HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8442 BRIAN J & BARBARA A KNUDSON HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8429 CHARLES E LOEFFLER II HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 - CHRISTOPHER ANDRIS KAULS 7254 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8435 DANIEL P & KATHRYN J O'CONNOR 7124 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7566 DARYOUSH GOLBAN 2232 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8432 DAVID A EICKMEYER REV TRUST 7339 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8429 DAVID B ERICKSON 7095 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7582 DAVID D KOESTER 7290 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8435 ELIZABETH BARNES 2179 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 - JEFFREY S & LAURI K WAGAMAN 2165 LONGACRES DR JOHN C & CARRIE M TIETZ LIV TRUSTS 7011 GALPIN BLVD CELSIOR31-8026 JONATHAN R SEPTER 2188 RED FOX CIR !CHANHASSENVMN17-7565 ANHASSEN17-8436 KEVIN F & GRETA C WARREN 4930 GREEN FARMS CIR NNEAPOLI36-1092 LARRY J & YOKO N STUEVE 7324 FAWN HILL RD ANHASSEN17-8429 LE THU CA 7319 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN17-8429 LONGACRES HOMEOWNERS ASSN INC PO BOX 542 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-0542 MARK R & TANYA L ERICKSON 2216 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8432 MARTIN ZIELINSKI REVTRUST 2211 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8432 MATTHEW CHAMBERS 2169 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8436 MICHAEL D & JANE E FELMLEE 7336 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8429 NATHANIEL KENT 6905 HIGHOVER LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-5002 PAUL A & AMY C HOLLIS 2221 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8432 PAUL & LYNNETTE A OLSON 2189 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8436 PETER JOHN GARBERG 7075 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7582 PRINCE R NELSON PO BOX 8265 WICHITA FALLS TX 76307-8265 ROBERT C & KRISTINE R COSGROVE N 7187 FAWHILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8443 ROBERT LESTER SHEEHAN 2199 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8436 SCOTT CARL & KATHRYN M WOSJE 7125 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7566 SCOTT HACE 7242 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8435 SHAWN YOU 7263 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8435 STEPHEN M & RENEE L PAWLYSITYN 7266 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8435 SUSAN M LOMBARDO REV TRUST 7278 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8435 SWALLOWTAIL VENTURES-CHANHASSEN LLC PO BOX 336 CHANHASSEN MN 55317- THEODORE E & BRENDA L DARKOW 2198 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8436 THOMAS V & CECELIA M HORSTMAN 7163 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8443 TIMOTHY C STEWART 7287 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8435 TODD A & SITYLA S ALLARD 7168 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8442 TODD M & KAREN T BIMBERG 7275 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317- TODD N & ANNE B JUTTING 7311 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8429 WADE OSBORNE 7175 FAWN HILL RD lCHANHASSEN I MN 55317-8443 Notice of Concept Plan Review Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Notice of Concept Plan Review Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until Date & Time: later, in the avenin depending on the order of thea enda. Location: Ci Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Pro heal: PUD Conce t Review A licant: U.S. Home Cor oration D/BIA Lennar Property 7141 Galpin Boulevard Location: A location map I: on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public notice is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens Public notice the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will Iva an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments and feedback are received from the ublic. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city s projects web page at: www.cl.chanhaseen.mn.us/2018-12. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson by email at kaanenson(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Questions & 952-227-1139. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Sign up to receive email and/or text not cations when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure' • Subdivisions, Reined Unit Developments. Site Plan Reviews, Co idironal and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rewiring, Code Amendment re,ums a public hearing before Me Planning Commission. City Comprehensive Ren Amendments and ordinances resume all property within 500 feet d Me subject site to be notified of the application In writing. My Interested party Is Invited to attend t e meeting. • Staff prepares a report on Me subject application that includes all pertinent infonnalmom and a recommendation. Three reports aro staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. available by request. At Me Manning Commission meeting, The Item will be opened for Me public to speak about Me proposal as a pert d the hearing process. The Commission Wil chair This to Me City Council. The City Council may raven, afinn W modify public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation wholly o peNy the Manrtlng Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and rode amendments take a simple majority land use amendments from residential M commer islAndustrial. vole d Me City Council incept rezonings and • Minnesota State statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless Me applicant waives this standard. months to complete. My person wishing to fici an item through the Some applications due to their complexity may take several process should check with the Riming Department regarding its statue and scheduling for the City Counal meeting. to a contact for the city. Often devolopers are encouraged To • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative Is encouraged provide meet vdlh the neighborhood regaMing their proposal. Staff is bui available M hammer Me protect with any Interested preadi. • Because the Manning Commission holds the Public hearing. the City Council does nu. Unules are Taken and any correspondence ro Included In Me report to that City Council. 9 you wish to have something to be included In Me repM. regarding the application was lease conies this Rennin StM Person named on Mer rustication. Notice of Concept Plan Review Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until Date & Time: later In Me avenin de endln on the order of the a enda. Location: Citv Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: PUD Concept Review Applicant: U.S. Home Cor ration D/B/A Lennar Property 7141 Galpin Boulevard Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public notice is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens W Wthe public notice through the following steps: at Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments and feedback are received from the public. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2018-12. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson by email at kaanenson(a)ci chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Questions d 952-227-1139. If you choose to submit written comments, It is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meetin . Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.cl.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Redsw Procedure: • Subdi islons, Planed Unit Davehpments, Site Ran Remews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Altershom, Razomngs, Comprehensive Ran Amendment and Code Amendments require a pudic hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be mottled of tat application In wiling. Any Interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on Me subject application that includes all pertinent IMormelim and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Renting Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be unshed for the Public to speak about Me proposal as a pad of Me hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation fictive Clty Council The City Cpundl may reverse, affirm or modify Misty or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezodngs, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of The City Council sacepl rezonings and lend use amendments from residential to commercialAndurdn.1 • Minnesota Stat Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard, Some applications due to their complexity may lake several months to complete. My Person wlehirg to fellow an item Mrogh the process should check Wth the Manning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Coundl meeting. • A neighbodhssd spokespenonlrepresenTabve Is encouraged to Provide a contact for the city. Often developers an encouraged to meet with the ndghboMwd regarding MM proposal. Staff is also available to havi the projed with any Interested thenori • Because Me Manning Commission holds the public heading, the Gty Council does not. Unities air Taken and any correspondence swathing to be included in the most, regarding the application WII he Included in IM report To the City Cwndl. ff you h M have re ease contact TheRanni Slats person named on the notification APPENDIX 4 ANTHEM ON THE PARK p� „ . �.,,.,,a,.m...a..,..,1_a�a; M°�..�,•�w�w�l:.:.1.�.�n,,.,,�,w..wm.,�.._.,.I,,.Y.w„d..m... I..�.�.I.�r�..,.aauc.._.n.,.,n...,..�.m.�r...,w,...m,....,m.....w..._ ... I. p.Y I. bM.Yt_,buniM1 un rnu M.n>aMer Mn uv`mr pwwepfn,m: MIw,M ileal IMLwPinmrsm Jnr.nu., r,n m•dn n..mwi �arann o .. w.ww,epa m pa ✓ xc4vMl dnE ✓xex.nmws saMsm Mcnr [wxx eami+w... n L_mm vein mlw sarx�a, uFv cww., wwem, mpr. mn, W nusnR c,llwl mwrv. plxran. IWq wFw,nnwvpwx�w wlwvNbWYanMaN Yw Yn. cnnvwvR.wun cWMrx Nn.NMdOT ItiwranFwwp N��I�.e'wY�.. vpanw FrL. uYYrvu.CSMY.IwvY N MCMn FI® 1 4 Stantec APPENDIX 5 Lake Lucy Ridge Lucy Ridge Lane & Lake Lucy Road Chanhassen, Minn. 55317 Lot Block Acre /Type 1 Trees PRICE 1 2 .48 / FB or LO / 5 $ 279,900 2 2 .51 / FB or LO / 7 $ 289,900 3 2 .52 / FB / 11 SOLD Lots 1 and 2 can be side 'Lookout' style homes. Lot Block Acre / Type/ Trees PRICE 1 Minnetonka Schools .51 / WO / 16 Chanhassen - City Sewer and Water 2 3 .45 / WO / 12 Lot Block Acre / Type/ Trees PRICE .45 / WO / 13 SOLD 4 1 1 .58/WO/ 8 SOLD 2 1 .48 / LO / 8 SOLD 3 1 .48/ FB/11 $ 259,900 4 1 .61 /W01 14 SOLD Lot Block Acre /Type 1 Trees PRICE 1 2 .48 / FB or LO / 5 $ 279,900 2 2 .51 / FB or LO / 7 $ 289,900 3 2 .52 / FB / 11 SOLD Lots 1 and 2 can be side 'Lookout' style homes. Lot Block Acre / Type/ Trees PRICE 1 3 .51 / WO / 16 SOLD 2 3 .45 / WO / 12 SOLD 3 3 .45 / WO / 13 SOLD 4 3 .461 WO 1 14 SOLD 5 3 .68 / WO / 10 SOLD 6 3 .43 / WO / 12 $ 289,900 7 3 .43 / WO / 7 $ 299,900 8 3 .46 / WO / 4 $ 349,900 9 3 .71 /WO/7 SOLD 10 3 .76/WO/7 SOLD Acre / Type / Trees: = lot size / lot style / trees to be planted in lot. FB = Full Basement or possible LO + retaining wall LO = Full Basement Look Out or 3rd level WO WO = Full Basement Walk Out Landscaping: Each Builder/homeowner shall comply with the City of Chanhassen Tree Replacement Plan, which includes at least 3 "over story" trees in the front yard. (see City list - oak, ash, linden, maple, etc.) April 14, 2005 "OPEN" DEVELOPMENT Bring Your Bulkier Plans with Spec's must be approved by Architectural Review Committee. Homeowner association covenants include: EXTERIOR — brick, stone, cedar and "Hardie Plank' — no vinyl or steel siding. FINISHED Sq. Ft. — Block 1 = 2,800 (Minimum) Sq. Ft. — Block 2 = 3,000 Sq. Ft. — Block 3 = 3,200 ROOF LINES - 8/12 or steeper ( Rambler 6112 ) minimum. IMPERVIOUS AREA ( roof, driveway, sidewalk, patio, ) — cannot exceed 25% of lot area. GARAGE — 3 car minimum Association Dues are $300 / year for 2005, billed annually. Noecker Development, LLC Randy Noecker, President Home Office 763-786-6387 Cell Phone 612-741-2662 Brochure Box: Map and price list in brochure box by'Lake Lucy Ridge' rock entrance sign - Call office for fax copy. Lot prices subject to change. SITE DEVELOPMENT MAP ON BACK Lake Lucy Ridge �- on Lake Lucy Road, east of Oaepin Blvd. Chanhassen, Minn. 55317 Loire Lucy Road 1 I 1 oonoT I 1 1 Lake Lucy I POND Noecker Development 0 Randy Noecker, president W/O � �� i�' Cell 612-741-2662 Office 763-768 2117 !1311 w n _ _� ` 1 i \ i �•? . Ale ,{•M f )loeo N ^ ( \L i'i{! (I e 4 , - - - - —e,'-'- - - - -'-•1P •' � { 1111• K M1 i i `'`'` '� + j Ale wH �r `'`• LO ' WIO > Wetlands i B ock 1 OAS aee w.. y 1• 19.871 WIO c ),.Ifo ,s M1 TI u le,)el w R `'\ _` 118 _ - _-•-•_•_ _' 11 nu w)) j aww WIl) Cgs w1) 9 Wo 14,00 +, n. 1n526 % i1 a W/O _._.-.-.-._._._. �1'0:�-- �\ ii..i Reel n h. 1 Emerald'! Lon `� (p •�� t•,�;��, - i W/o 1 +.)ld•1•- -� 1�'�. `\DAN �- •� i w.i..: •` I X1:1 .... q \) 1.-.- _��_.. _...__-_- �—� l W/O Ultimately Developed With One ' 1 I to . I I Home Across Two Lots FuI I )1113 ., 2 1 6 Aanenson, Kate From: Jon Yanta <jon.yanta@cushwake.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 3:04 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Cc: Jon Yanta Qon.yanta@cushwake.com) Subject: FW: Letter of Support for Galpin Property Dear Planning Commission, City Staff and City Council: Re: Letter of Support for Galpin Property Development Proposal Letter from the Yanta Family Jon, Kalley and Family 365 Pleasant view Road Chanhassen, MN My family and I have been following the proposed development for the 188 acre property on Galpin Road. It is our understanding that the Developer, Lennar, is willing to set aside approximately 100 acres which includes the wetland area? This is incredible as most developers would want to set aside the minimum 10%. This shows a very high level of commitment to the city and the environment. Hopefully the neighbors can appreciate what is being offered. My family would really enjoy being able to legally walk through that park some day. Thank you for all you are doing to responsibly protect property owner rights to develop and to look after our natural resources. Respectfully, Jon and Kalley Yanta The information contained in this email (including any attachments) is confidential, may be subject to legal or other professional privilege and contain copyright material, and is intended for use by the named recipient(s) only. Access to or use of this email or its attachments by anyone else is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you may not use, disclose, copy or distribute this email or its attachments (or any part thereof), nor take or omit to take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or email and delete it, and all copies thereof, including all attachments, from your system. Any confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost because this email has been sent to you by mistake. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to reduce the risk of transmitting software viruses, we accept no liability for any loss or damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or unapproved access. Aanenson, Kate MENNEN From: Meredith McGuirk <meremcguirk@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 5:15 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Fwd: Galpin Property - PUD July 17, 2018 Planning Commission City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O.Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Planning Commission Members, We recently learned of the Planned Unit Development for the Galpin Property, formerly owned by Prince. We write today to formerly register our opposition to the plan. Weare residents of Chanhassen in the Lucy Ridge neighborhood, adjacent to the PUD land. Interestingly, the concept review offered by Lennaron page 2 states that the "existing neighborhood to the North (Ashling Meadows) provides two existing road stubs to the subject property." This is inaccurate. Ashling Meadows provides one existing road stub, while our neighborhood, a 16 unit custom home development contains the other. The current plan proposes direct access through the Lucy Ridge neighborhood. We oppose the PUD in its current form for the following reasons: • Safety. We are a 16 home development currently attached to a 45 home development, commonly called Ashling Meadows. The one street leaving our community is already heavily flooded with traffic from Ashling Meadows. With one access road out of neighborhood residents cutting through often travel well beyond the speed limit and ignore stop signs, causing significant hazards to the small children living in our neighborhood. The same road proposed as a pass through to the PUD property contains a bus stop for dozens of elementary children aged k-5. I cannot imagine the additional safety hazard caused by the increased flow of traffic from another adjoining neighborhood twice the size. Simply stated, the current plan is only acceptable if the Commission disregards public safety to the children in our neighborhood. • Environmental. 1 think it is reasonable that even with the VERY BEST construction and water management techniques, given the proximity of proposed development to Lakes Lucy and Ann, it is, as a practical matter, impossible to prevent harmful phosphorous runoff (especially at the outset), and to furthermore expect the preservation of Lake Ann's pristine quality and clarity in concert with the proposed development would be naive and reckless. • Please also refer to Donna and Brian Strauss' letter, dated July 4, 2018. We concur with all statements raised in their letter to the Commission and City Council. It is my sincere hope that the Planning Commission and City Council will consider alternative road access points. Alternatively 1 urge the Commission to consider the development of a smaller community ending in a cul de sac connecting to our community that will be less hazardous and disruptive to current community members. While I understand the desire to have several access points, I also find it alarming that the Commission would not consider the disruptive and significant impact this will have on neighborhoods developed almost 15 years ago. Sincerely, Meredith and Greg McGuirk 1770 Lucy Ridge Court Aanenson, Kate From: Dave K <david.koelln@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 4:55 PM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Galpin Property - PUD Concept Review: Prince's Property Chanhassen Planning Commission, I know I am a little late to the game here but after reviewing tonight's agenda regarding Prince's property, I have to agree with the letters from both Holly Nelson and the Strauss family. This current proposal cannot be the final option. I understand why this land will be eventually be developed into housing and I support the concept in coordination with updating Galpin to support the additional residence but the home value of the existing homes, would certainly take a hit when adding 200 homes. Please reconsider this proposal and seek other options. I have been a Chanhassen resident since 2013 and am proud to be raising my family here. David Koelln Email: david.koellnAiunail.com Aanenson, Kate From: jneichin@mchsi.com Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 7:56 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Galpin Property - Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Review - Please Forward to Planning Commission Members July 16, 2018 City Planning Commission City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attention: Andrew Aller, Steven Weick, Mark Randall, Mark Undestad, John Tietz, Nancy Madsen, Michael McGonagill Subject: Galpin Property - Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Review We are residents of Chanhassen and have resided at our above address since 2004. We live in Lake Lucy Ridge, the neighborhood directly north of the Chanhassen parcels of land commonly referred to as the "Prince Property". Regarding that property, we see that during the July 17, 2018 Chanhassen Planning Commission meeting, you will be taking up a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Review. While one of us will endeavor to attend that meeting, we write to you today to register our strongest possible opposition to that proposed development. We cannot emphasize our opposition to this project enough; and please note that in our 14 years as residents of Chanhassen, this is the first stance we have taken in opposition to any development in our city. We oppose this development for at least these reasons: 1. Environmental. The proposed development is overly disruptive to the environment. The irreparable harm that would be caused to Lake Ann Lake due to the grading of the said property and the impact to our community in terms of visitors and revenue, would be catastrophic, and could take decades to recover. This development will certainly harm the wetlands, both during construction as well as after construction. Additionally, we would imagine that hundreds of trees will need to be removed from the parcels in question. For example, just look at current poor state of Lake Lucy brought about by the new development at Yosemite Ave and now consider the impact to Lake Ann. 2. Safety. The proposed development will add exorbitant traffic to the broader area and make pedestrian crossing unsafe. Currently, cars are traveling in over the posted limits, and "rolling stops" at 4 way stops are a common occurrence. Additionally, and importantly, our neighborhood (Lake Lucy Ridge), and the existing neighborhood to the west of us (Ashling Meadows), will bear the brunt of this additional traffic, as the proposed development calls for the opening and continuation of existing dead ended streets into the proposed development. 3. Duration Of Construction. To accommodate approximately 200 new homes, our community will be burdened by construction activity for many, many years. Of note, we have a small development going in near us on the corner of Lake Lucy Road and Yosemite Avenue. That small neighborhood alone will likely take 2-3 years to complete at the current pace. 4.Congestion To The Surrounding Neighborhoods. This is not a small development being proposed. This is a massive, approximately 200 lot development and it will leave the area overly congested. Thank you, Jeff Neichin 1790 Lucy Ridge Court Chanhassen, MN 55317 Aanenson, Kate From: Julie Witt <juliewitt20@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2018 11:01 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Re: Galpin Blvd Proposed Development Thanks Kate. I appreciate the information. I'm not sure I will be able to join future meetings so I will take you up on the offer to leave my feedback with you. Comments are below. My vote if I had to choose between the 2 would be for concept #2. This concept builds 199 homes on 88 acres. Why this plan is better: 1. Less impact to wetlands. One of the things I love about Chanhassen is how much natural land there is. I am concerned how many trees the first concept will take down and the disruption to nature it will create. I would love to see Chanhassen utilize the undeveloped acres for trails instead. It is a beautiful piece of land and I would appreciate the ability for the public to use part of it. 2. Variety of price ranges. 65' and 90' lots will probably still be above average home prices especially with the opportunity for families to add upgrades (having priced Lennar homes before). One question, would the city consider adding trails for biking and/or hiking to the undeveloped land? Thanks for you consideration as you assess the available plans. Julie Witt > On Jun 27, 2018, at 8:01 AM, Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> wrote: > Julie, > There will be a number of opportunities for you to give input into the proposed development. There is a concept review going to the Planning Commission on July 17th. You can review the staff report online on the city's website and should be available on July 12th. You can attend that meeting or submit your comments in writing to me and I will share with the Planning Commission and City Council. The staff report outlines the review process, after the concept review they will come go through preliminary plat with another public hearing at the Planning Commission. The developer has expressed they would have a neighborhood meeting. > Kate > Kathryn Aanenson, AICP > Community Development Director > CITY OF CHANHASSEN > PH. 952.227.1139 > FX. 952.227.1110 > www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us > -----Original Message----- > From: Julie Witt <juliewitt20@gmaii.com> > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 7:00 PM > To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> > Subject: Galpin Blvd Proposed Development will ou > Hi Kate, > Will the public be able to give input to the decision for this development? > Thanks, > Julie CITY OF CHANHASSEN P 0 BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 07/05/2018 1:41 PM Receipt No. 00382494 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Lennar Family of Builders 16305 36th Ave N Ste 600 Plymouth MN 55446- 7141 Galpin Blvd Planning Case 2018-12 ------------------------------------------------------- Sign Rent 200.00 Rezoning Fees 750.00 GIS List 123.00 Total Cash Check 01014298 Change 1,073.00 0.00 1,073.00 0.00 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on July 5, 2018, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of an application for a Planned Unit Development concept review for property located at 7141 Galpin Boulevard and zoned Rural Residential District (RR). Applicant/Owner: Lennar, to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and swom to before me this --5 day of til -12018. A ��i0'/ / q, . rJ t Kim T. a sen, Deput C JENNIFER ANN POTTER Notary Public -Minnesota My CommWbn Emw .Mn 91, 2020 SGitAm Notice of Concept Plan Review Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening. dependtna on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: PUD Concept Review Applicant: U.S. Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar Property 7141 Galpin Boulevard Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public notice is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public notice through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments and feedback are received from the public. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2018-12. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson by Questions & email at kaanenson cDci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952-227-1139. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions. panned Unit Developments, Site Ran Reviewa, Conditional and Interim Uses, WeOend Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive pan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the panning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in venting. Any Interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Induces all pediment infoonation and a recommendation. These wads are available by request. At the panning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a pad of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss me Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse. affirm or modify wholly or partly the panning Commission's recommentlation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vole of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallnduslrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the panning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersco/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the panning Commission holds the public hearing, the Oty Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. 0 you wish to have something to be Included in the report, lease contact the Planning Stall pension named an the notification. Notice of Concept Plan Review Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening,depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: PUD Concept Review Applicant: U.S. Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar Property 7141 Galpin Boulevard Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public notice is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public notice through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments and feedback are received from the public. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.c!.chanhassen.mn.us/2018-12. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson by Questions & email at kaanenson(o)ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952-227-1139. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.cl.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned unit Developments, site Ran Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Ran Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pediment Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Manning Commission meeting. staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will as, opened far the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or perry the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments lake a simple majority vale of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerclatlindustnal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Panning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonlrepresen relive Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any Interested persoms). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the Oty Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included In the report to the City Council. 0 you wish to have something to be Induded in the report, lease contact the PlanningStaff person named on the notification. TAX -NAME BERCH CAPITAL LLC TAX -ADD -Ll --TAX-ADD-L2 261 SCHOOL AVE #240 EXCELSIOR TAX_ADD_1-3 MN 55331-2067 BRADLEY G & ALISA L LACOMY 7301 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8429 BRIAN & ANNALISA SAWTELL 7184 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8442 BRIAN J & BARBARA A KNUDSON 7312 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8429 CHARLES E LOEFFLER II 7327 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8429 CHRISTOPHER ANDRIS KAULS 7254 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8435 DANIEL P & KATHRYN J O'CONNOR 7124 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7566 DARYOUSH GOLBAN 2232 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8432 DAVID A EICKMEYER REV TRUST 7339 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8429 DAVID B ERICKSON 7095 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7582 DAVID D KOESTER 7290 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8435 ELIZABETH BARNES 2179 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 - JEFFREY S & LAURI K WAGAMAN 2165 LONGACRES DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7565 JOHN C & CARRIE M TIETZ LIV TRUSTS 7011 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8026 JONATHAN R SEPTER 2188 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8436 KEVIN F & GRETA C WARREN 4930 GREEN FARMS CIR MINNEAPOLIS MN 55436-1092 LARRY J & YOKO N STU EVE 7324 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8429 LE THU CA 7319 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8429 LONGACRES HOMEOWNERS ASSN INC PO BOX 542 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-0542 MARK R & TANYA L ERICKSON 2216 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8432 MARTIN ZIELINSKI REV TRUST 2211 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8432 MATTHEW CHAMBERS 2169 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8436 MICHAEL D & JANE E FELMLEE 7336 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8429 NATHANIELJ KENT 6905 HIGHOVER LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-5002 PAUL A & AMY C HOLLIS 2221 HUNTER DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8432 PAUL J & LYNNETTE A OLSON 2189 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8436 PETER JOHN GARBERG 7075 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7582 PRINCE R NELSON PO BOX 8265 WICHITA FALLS TX 76307-8265 ROBERT C & KRISTINE R COSGROVE 7187 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8443 ROBERT LESTER SHEEHAN 2199 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8436 SCOTT CARL & KATHRYN M WOSJE 7125 NORTHWOOD CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7566 SCOTT HACE 17242 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8435 SHAWN YOU 17263 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8435 STEPHEN M & RENEE L PAWLYSITYN SUSAN M LOMBARDO REV TRUST SWALLOWTAIL VENTURES-CHANHASSEN LLC 7266 FAWN HILL RD 7278 FAWN HILL RD PO BOX 336 CHANHASSEN CHANHASSEN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8435 MN 55317-8435 MN 55317 - THEODORE E & BRENDA L DARKOW 2198 RED FOX CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8436 THOMAS V & CECELIA M HORSTMAN 7163 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8443 TIMOTHY C STEWART 7287 FAWN HILL RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8435 TODD A & SITYLA S ALLARD 7168 FAWN HILL RD ICHANHASSEN MN 55317-8442 TODD M & KAREN T BIMBERG 7275 FAWN HILL RD ICHANHASSEN MN 55317-8435 TODD N & ANNE BJUTTING 7311 FAWN HILL RD ICHANHASSEN MN 55317-8429 WADE OSBORNE 17175 FAWN HILL RD ICHANHASSEN MN 55317-8443 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF CONCEPT PLAN rl-"NLNG CASE NO. 2018-12 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a m,hlil in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this notice is to consider an application for a Planned Unit Development concept review for property located at 7141 Galpin Boulevard and zoned Rural Residential District (RR). Applicant/Owner: Lennart of helan proposal showingis the avai location for public review on the city's web site at wwwci.chanhassen. mn.us/2018-12 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public notice and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Kate Aanenson, ACIS Email: kaanenson@ ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952227.1139 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, July 5, 2018: No 4599) WANNM Affidavit Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. VS was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cm from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwx�y�z/ J Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on O1S RATE INFORMATION Lowest classifiedrate paid by commercial users for comparable space .... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $12.97 per column inch Q_)!, RK =OTARY OTA 13t123 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classifiedrate paid by commercial users for comparable space .... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $12.97 per column inch R BRIAN & DONNA STRAUSS phone: 952.474.6235 fax: 952.474.6237 6840 Lucy Ridge Lane cell: 310.743.4684 (Brian) Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 cell: 952.412.6011 (Donna) e-mail: briancstrauss@me.com (Brian) e-mail: donnamstrauss@me.com (Donna) July 4, 2018 Planning Commission City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attention: Andrew Aller, Steven Weick, Mark Randall, Mark Undestad, John Tietz, Nancy Madsen, Michael McGonagill Subiect: Galpin Property - Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Review Planning Commission Members, We are residents of Chanhassen and have resided at our above address since 2004. We live in Lake Lucy Ridge, the neighborhood directly north of the Chanhassen parcels of land commonly referred to as the "Prince Property". Regarding that property, we see that during the July 17, 2018 Chanhassen Planning Commission meeting, you will be taking up a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Review. While one of us will endeavor to attend that meeting, we write to you today to register our strongest possible opposition to that proposed development. We cannot emphasize our opposition to this project enough; and please note that in our 14 years as residents of Chanhassen, this is the first stance we have taken in opposition to any development in our city. We oppose this development for at least these reasons: 1. Environmental. The proposed development is overly disruptive to the environment. As you know, there are wetlands on and around the property which need to be managed with care. This development will certainly harm the wetlands, both during construction as well as after construction. Additionally, we would imagine that hundreds of trees will need to be removed from the parcels in question. 2. Duration Of Construction. To accommodate approximately 200 new homes, our community will be burdened by construction activity for many, many years. Of note, we have a small development going in near us on the corner of Lake Lucy Road and Yosemite Avenue. That small neighborhood alone will likely take 2-3 years to complete at the current pace. 3. Congestion To The Surrounding Neighborhoods. This is not a small development being proposed. This is a massive, approximately 200 lot development and it will leave the area overly congested. 4. Traffic & Traffic Flow. The proposed development will add exorbitant traffic to the broader area. Additionally, and importantly, our neighborhood (Lake Lucy Ridge), and the existing neighborhood to the west of us (Ashling Meadows), will bear the brunt of this additional traffic, as the proposed development calls for the opening and continuation of existing dead ended streets into the proposed development. -Th Is 14,ffv aA�t /,i t7 Y-I\c tom— 1Z —3evtvL) Planning Commission - City of Chanhassen July 7,1018 2 5. Proposed Housing Styles/Declining Property Value. After a review of Lenar's presentation materials, it appears the houses being proposed for the site are of sizes and types that will lower housing values for existing neighboring homeowners. Additionally, the massive scale of approximately 200 new homes coming to market will depress housing value meaningfully. Of note, housing values are just now coming back to pricing levels seen in the early 2000's, when much of the current housing stock in the surrounding area was built. 6. Alternatives Are Available & Have Not Been Explored. Based on our review of the Application For Development Review as posted on the City of Chanhassen website (which is not signed by the property owner), as well our review of property records on the Carver County Property Information website, it appears Prince R. Nelson (and we would assume, now, his estate) is still the taxpayer of record for the parcels. Given the property has not yet been sold, it remains that there are a multitude of development alternatives available - alternatives which are more equitable to all stakeholders in the community including the property rights of the current property owner. At least these options are available: a. Having the City of Chanhassen acquire the land, or a portion of the land for communal property benefits, and to preserve the environment. b. In keeping with the current zoning of the parcels, develop the land with larger lot sizes which will reduce the density of housing and lower the adverse impacts as previously discussed. c. The land is a continuous piece of property made up of various parcels. Parcel #25.6900030 is of particular interest to us and, we suspect, to many of our neighbors in the northern bordering area. This parcel, if it was "broken off and sold separately" could be developed in a fashion in keeping with the current zoning, and in a manner which would not require streets breaking through to the balance of the southern parcels in question. The significant benefit to that would be to minimize undue disruption to our neighborhood (Lake Lucy Ridge) and the neighborhood to the west of us (Ashling Meadows), the two existing neighborhoods which would be most adversely affected. I can assure you there would likely be a buyer for that parcel as a standalone parcel. A Zoning Change Is Required. It appears the proposed development will require a zoning change to accommodate this development. Again, we stand in strong opposition to this proposed development and encourage you, as the Planning Commission, to reject it in it's current form, using all avenues and procedures available. There are a plethora of alternatives that offer greater benefit to all stakeholders, including the property rights of the current property owner. Sincerely, Brian C. Strauss Donna M. Strauss RILEY�ff� PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Memorandum 18681 Lake Drive East Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-607-6512 www.rpbcwd.org To: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director From: Terry Jeffery, CWD Subject: Proposed Single -Family Residential Development Galpin Boulevard Planning Case 2018-12 Date: June 29, 2018 c: Claire Bleser, Administrator Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District This proposed redevelopment will need a Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) permit prior to beginning construction activities. This includes clearing and grubbing and any grading activities. We appreciate the opportunity to provide preliminary comments on the project. The RPBCWD has not received a permit application for this project but offers the following summary of preliminary RPBCWD review comments for the proposed Galpin Boulevard Development in Chanhassen, MN. Additional comments will likely arise once an official application is submitted for RPBCWD review. We are currently scheduled to meet the developer to discuss the project the week of July r". The RPBCWD permit application, rules and rule guidance are available for download on the RPBCWD website: http: / /www.rpbcwd.org/permits/. The following comments are based on the rules that would likely apply to this project and highlight the areas where revisions or additional information would be needed to meet the RPBCWD rules. These review comments do not constitute approval, a variance, or exemption from the rules. Therefore, this project will require permit approvals from the RPBCWD Board of Managers. These comments should be considered in the context that Lake Ann has some of the best water quality in the District and that is, in large part, a result of the limited development around the lake. Urbanization of a watershed will always result in degradation of water quality. Steps should be taken to minimize and mitigate these impacts to this unique resource that is so central to Chanhassen's park system and provides so many recreational and educational opportunities. The preservation of woodland and wetland areas, especially those more proximal to Lake Ann through better site design practices such as density transfer are strongly supported. Rule B: Floodplain Management and Drainage Alterations Rule B: Floodplain Management and Drainage Alterations applies if a project alters or fills land below the roo-year flood elevation of a waterbody in the watershed. Based on the submitted plans, it is unclear if the project will fill below the roo-year flood elevation of one or more of the wetland on the site. In this case Rule B would apply, and the comments below should be reflected in the plans. • Compensatory storage at the same elevation (+/- r foot) and within the floodplain of the same unterhnrly mnct he nrnvi(lerl fnr anv fill helnw the ioo-vear flood elevation. Rule C: Erosion and Sediment Control Erosion and Sediment Control Permit (Rule C) is required from the RPBCWD because more than 5o cubic yards of earth will be placed, altered, or removed and more than 5,000 square feet of land -surface area will be altered (Rule C, Section za). Please see Rule C, Section 3 for the applicable criteria and notes that must be included with the erosion control aspects of the proposed project. Given the high level, generalized nature of the provided plans the necessary erosion control notes or needed erosion prevention and sediment control features are not shown. The needed erosion control notes for inclusion on the plan sheets are available for download under supporting documents on the RPBCWD website: http://www.rpbewd.org/permits/, Rule D: Wetland and Creek Buffer A Wetland and Creek Buffer Permit (Rule D) is required from the RPBCWD because the proposed activities trigger RPBCWD Rule J (Rule D, Section z) and there are several wetlands on the project parcel downgradient of the proposed work based on the submitted site survey, the approved wetland type and boundary determination report, National Wetland Inventory mapping, and indicated in the project narrative. Efforts should be taken to avoid and minimize wetland impacts where possible in a manner consistent with the MN WCA and with consideration given to the comments of the Technical Evaluation Panel. Comments provided below are preliminary in nature and the applicant should review the RPBCWD's Wetland and Creek Buffer Rule for full details on submittal requirements. The following criteria would apply. • A copy of the wetland delineation report and MnRAM assessment must be provided with the application package to confirm the wetland value in accordance with RPBCWD Appendix Dr. The RPBCWD value may differ from the value assigned by the city of Chanhassen. • Buffer must be indicated by permanent, free-standing markers at the buffers upland edge, in material conformity with a design and text provided by the District. A marker must be placed along each lot line, with additional markets at an interval of no more than zoo feet or where the buffer changes direction. The location of the markers and a detail for the markers must be provided. • A note must be included on the plans indicating: The potential transfer of aquatic invasive species (e.g., zebra mussels, Eurasian watermilfod, etc.) must be minimized to the maximum extent possible. • Before any work subject to District permit requirements commences, buffer areas and maintenance requirements must be documented in a declaration and recorded in the office of the county recorder or registrar. Rule J: Stormwater Management A Stormwater Management Permit (Rule J) is required for this project because more than 5o cubic yards of earth will be placed, altered, or removed and more than 5,000 square feet of land -surface area will be altered (Rule J, Section za) based on the information provided by the City. Based on the information provided, it appears the project is a new development and the criteria in Rule J, Section 3 would apply to the entire parcel. Comments provided below are preliminary and general in nature and the applicant should review the RPBCWD's Stormwater Management Rule for full details on submittal requirements. The following criteria would apply. CenterPoint Energy June 21, 2018 Bob Generous City of Chanhassen PC Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-227-1131 bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 700 West Linden Avenue PO Box 1165 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1165 RE: Planned Unit Development review for property located at 7141 Galpin Boulevard. Dear Mr. Generous: CenterPoint Energy has no objection or issues related to the Planned Unit Development review for property located at 7141 Galpin Boulevard. Thank you for the advance notice. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 612-321-5381. Respectfully, CENTERPOINT ENERGY aJ114e 1r, Chuck Mayers, SRWA Right of Way Agent III charle.mayers@centerPointenergy.com PC: William F. Kallberg, C&M Supervisor, CenterPoint Energy Alan L. Jongerius, C&M Advance Foreperson, CenterPoint Energy Eric Yang, Area Engineer, CenterPoint Energy Andrew Balgobin, Administration Engineer, CenterPoint Energy f t COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF CHANHASSFN Planning Division – 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address – P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 09 tet' APPLICATION �R��DEVELOPM NT REVIEW { Y,/ Submittal Date: ✓ T PC Date: 1 I 1 I I I, R CC Date: D 60 -Day Review Date: V 1 / (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ All Others ......................................................... $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others ......................................................... $425 ❑V Rezoning (REZ) ❑, Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Administrative ..................................................$100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts` ...................... $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: (_ thousand square feet) Include number of exi i employees: Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_ units) ❑ Subdivision (SUB) NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ,TSr"Notiflcation Sign (City to install and remove)...................................................................................................................... $200 ❑ Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting) ..................... $3 per address ..... addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)....................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration ermd ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements( easements) ❑ Deed 107'3 a TOTAL FP� OF F.� Description of Proposal: Residential Development application; Narrative attached ''UN 15 2018 Property Address or Location: Parcel #: Multiple, See narrative Legal Description: _ Total Acreage: 188.00 Wetlands Present? Present Zoning: Rural Residential District (RR) Present Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Existing Use of Property: Vacant, portions farmed ❑Check box if separate narrative is attached. 7141 Galpin Rd, Chanhassen ® Yes ❑ No Requested Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Requested Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density _)E D ❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot L— lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots)..................................$300 ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ......................................... $150 ❑ Final Plat ..........................................................$700 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)' `Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence........... I ................... $150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ,TSr"Notiflcation Sign (City to install and remove)...................................................................................................................... $200 ❑ Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting) ..................... $3 per address ..... addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)....................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration ermd ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements( easements) ❑ Deed 107'3 a TOTAL FP� OF F.� Description of Proposal: Residential Development application; Narrative attached ''UN 15 2018 Property Address or Location: Parcel #: Multiple, See narrative Legal Description: _ Total Acreage: 188.00 Wetlands Present? Present Zoning: Rural Residential District (RR) Present Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Existing Use of Property: Vacant, portions farmed ❑Check box if separate narrative is attached. 7141 Galpin Rd, Chanhassen ® Yes ❑ No Requested Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Requested Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density _)E D Section 3: Property . Applicant APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: U.S. Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar Contact: Joe Jablonski Address: 16305 36th Ave N, Suite 600 Phone: (952) 249-3014 City/State/Zip: Plymouth, MN 55446 Cell: (612) 490-6076 Email: joe.jablonski@lennar.com Fax: Signature: Joe Jablonski DatuI2018W byJM105I mki Date: 6/14/18 PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: ❑ Property Owner Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: Applicant Via: R] Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑ Engineer Via: E] Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMIT FORM (US Home/Lennar) Galpin Property —191 Gross Acres Total Homesites — 191 Approximate Developed Area — 89 acres Open Space — 50 acres Preserved wetlands — 49 acres Traditional homesites — 31 Average Lot — 90' wide Landmark Homesites —126 Average Lot — 65' wide -115 75' wide -11 Villa Homesites — 34 Average Lot — 55' wide Project Team Developer: U.S. Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar Builder: Lennar Corporation Primary Contact: Joe Jablonski Planner/Engineer/Surveyor: Pioneer Engineering Geotechnical Engineer: Braun Intertec Wetland Specialist: Midwest Natural Resources, Inc. Landscape Architect: Pioneer Engineering Legal Council: Vantage Law Group Association Manager: TBD 7 Galpin property Tree Preservation Upland area calculation Gross project area 190.2 acres Less unimpacted wetland area 47.8acres Less Galpin dedication 1.8 acres Less Bluff area 1.2 acres Less required park dedication 9.2 acres Net project area 130.2 acres Proposed PUD Total upland area (excl wetlands, bluff and parkland) 130.2 acres Baseline canopy coverage 69% or 89.8 acres Minimum canopy coverage required 46% or 59.8 acres Proposed tree preservation 36% or 47.5 acres preserves 47.5 acres of woods removes 42.3 acres of woods Concept Plan Estimate from artist's renderin Total upland area (excl wetlands, bluff and parkland) 130.2 acres Baseline canopy coverage 69% or 89.8 acres Minimum canopy coverage required 46% or 59.8 acres Proposed tree preservation 3% or 5 acres Preserves 5 acres of woods Removes 84.8 acres of woods a: CONCEPT PLAN _7o['.rr¢-ate a � •ti ;l 1 r � A -41 `n _7o['.rr¢-ate a � •ti ;l Public Comment MEETING CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, MARCH 5, 201% 7PM Chanhassen City Council Chambers Review Modifications to Proposed Galpin Boulevard Property Planned Unit Development (PUD) Subdivision Revisions to the Lennar Galpin propegyesubdivision were discussed at the January 28 pnd February 11 City Council work sessions. The City Council requested an additional meeting by the Planning Commission with public comment to review changes to the proposed low-density plat. The City of Chanhassen wants its citizens to be informed of changes occurring in the community. Please take time out of your busy schedule to hear about the suggested changes. h Examples of extant cluster Planned Unit Developments: Preserve at Rice Lake: [PC 2013-12116 detached single-family units Zoning Table: Min. Lot Area Front Setback Rear Setback* Side Setback I Lot Cover 10,000 sq. ft. 25' 30' 10' house, 5' side 30% Wetland Setback: 20 -foot buffer; 30 -foot principal structure, 15 -foot accessory structure * 15 foot accessory Arbor Glen: [PC 2015-16/PC 2018-06] 18 detached single-family units Zoning Table: Min. Lot Area I Front Setback Rear Setback* Side Setback Lot Cover 5,000 sq. ft. 25' (to curb) 10' side street NA 6' 5' (driveway) 25% *All lots abut outlots and are subject to projects 50' perimeter setback. Gas Pipeline Setback: 20' from easement Wetland Setback: 20' buffer; 30' buffer setback BCOD: 40 structure setback; 20' buffer Preserve at Bluff Creek: [PC 2006-14) 155 detached single-family units Toning Table: Min. 8,000 sq. I lot area Front 25' (garage side) Setback 20' (comer non - garage side Rear 15' Setback Side 10'/5' Setback Min 15' between units Lot 30% Cover Wetland Setback: 16.6' buffer; 40' buffer setback/ BCOD: 40 structure setback; first 20' buffer. Camden RidEe: IPC 2013-13132 detached single-family, 26 attached units F :.., CXT -' f . lob ��- MA 4WW �, r T -LI- /J— -1- ..1.. C...: t. r� LV1L11 16V1Y VY14Yaaw Min. Lot Area Ju, r♦ Front Setback Rear Setback Side Setback Lot Cover 9,000 25' 25' 10' house, 5' side 35%* (per unit 20' side street 15' s aration (JVlllll 16V1Y 1YY Min. Lot Area 113 a1VaaaYJ Front Setback Rear Setback* Side Setback Lot Cover 5,100 sq. ft. 25' 25' 7.5' 35%* (per unit 20' side street 15' s aration BCOD: 40' structure setback; first 20' buffer *Lots within Shoreland District may not exceed 25% Ci:\PLANM2o19 Planning CasesUMI Galpin Site Preliminary Plat and Rezoning PUD\Existing Cluster Developmmts.dmx 3 L O N G A C R Update of proposed Galpin (Prince Property) development The developer made very few changes to the original concept. Note: City requested the developer to come back with a revised plan. The developer indicates, they made the changes they felt were necessary and are moving forward with much of their original plan. The developer is asking the City to approve a density transfer, (to transfer the majority of the homes to the west side (Galpin side) of the development. What does this mean...? The City allows so many homes per acre. The City is asking for protected property around the Lakes on the property. To accomplish this, the Developer is asking the City to transfer the density of homes that would have been built on that side of the development over to the Galpin side. The benefit: the City gets a large parcel of land around the lakes. The significant downside for Longacres: all the land on Galpin will be clear cut and almost 300,000 yards of dirt will be moved and leveled to make room for all these. The guiding documents of the City strongly suggest maintaining canopy (tree cover and removing as little as possible). This plan flies in the face of this. Additionally, placing the proposed 191 homes all on the Galpin side (west side) of the development places all traffic and Galpin. Additional significant concern: traffic will come out and possible cut through on Longacres and Hunter for traffic to get over to highway 41. Is preserving property around the lake important, yes; but at what cost? As one of the planning commissioners spoke about his vote "against" approving this plan: you are asking me to put one my hands over one of my eyes, so I only see the good and ignore the bad. What the Association needs form you: your voice! 1. We need to let the City know that we are against the density transfer. 2. We want to see a plan that maintains as much of the original property (and does not destroy all the trees and contours, all for the sake of packing in more homes). 3. Reaffirm the original request of the City to the developer: present a revised plan that takes neighboring comments in the account (i.e., another option, as opposed to the same thing). 4. A proposed neighborhood that helps Longacre's homes value, not hurt our values. Current status: Planning Commission voted 3-3 to turn -down developers plan. That means it goes to the City Council with a tie recommendation. The City Council discussed this proposal in their Work Session on January 28`n This is (as of yet), not scheduled for an agenda item on the City Council Board meeting. Rest assured, it will be, and Longacres needs to have their voice heard. Hear is the contact info for each Council Member. Please write to them or call them and express your concern for Chanhassen and Longacres. We need to stand -strong for another option for this beautiful piece of Chanhassen property. Please contact all four Council Members and the Mayor and express our concerns... make your voice heard to help our neighborhood. Contact info follows L O N•G A C R E S Elise Ryan, Mayor eryan@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 6587 Shadow Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ph: (612) 703-0598 Term expires 12/31/2022 • Bethany Tjornhom, Council Member btiornhom@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 96 Olympic Circle Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ph: (612) 695-2108 Term expires 12/31/2020 • Jerry McDonald, Council Member amcdonald@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 88 Olympic Circle Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ph: (952)253-1406 Term expires 12/31/2020 • Julia Coleman, Council Member icoleman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 434 Mission Hills Way East Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ph: (612) 232-9974 Term expires 12/31/2022 • Dan Campion, Council Member dcampion@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 340 Trappers Pass Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ph: (612) 865-9729 Term expires 12/31/2022 PIN PROPERTY j A I_l2fal Ill fill :311 d Wetland Buffer Setback 20 ft. * 25 ft with Sidewalk 90 ft Lots Lot Lot Area (SF) Lot Width (Feet) Lot Depth (Feet) I s Area u SF 90 ft Lots PUD 15,000 90 167 5,500 75 ft Lots PUD 11,000 75 147 4,400 65 ft Lots PUD 8,450 65 130 4,400 55 ft Lots PUD 6,875 1 55 125 3,400 5 Front Setback Rear Setback Side Yard Setback Corner Setback CR 117 Setback 90 ft Lots 20 ft * 25 ft 7.5 ft 20 ft 50 ft 75 ft Lots 20 ft 25 ft 7.5 ft 20 ft 50 It 65 ft Lots 25 ft 25 ft 7.5 ft 20 ft 50 ft 55 ft Lots 25 ft 25 ft 7.5 ft 1 20 ft 50 ft Wetland Buffer Setback 20 ft. * 25 ft with Sidewalk 90 ft Lots Lot Lot Area (SF) Lot Width (Feet) Lot Depth (Feet) Imperviou s Area S 1 501 17,122 90 190 5,500 2 502 18,322 90 172 5,500 3 503 15,066 90 166 5,500 4 504 1 22,778 90 252 5,500 5 505 23,376 90 243 5,500 6 506 16,704 90 189 5,500 7 507 21,184 90 216 5,500 8 508 21,715 90 135 5,500 9 509 24,394 90 160 5,500 10 510 20,655 90 150 5,500 11 511 18,183 90 170 5,500 12 512 18,275 90 171 5,500 13 513 15,030 90 167 5,500 14 514 15,030 90 167 5,500 15 515 15,032 90 167 5,500 16 516 15,574 90 175 5,500 17 517 15,514 90 175 5,500 18 518 15,482 90 174 5,500 19 519 15,576 90 174 5,500 20 520 15,300 90 170 5,500 21 521 15,300 90 170 5,500 22 522 15,300 90 170 5,500 23 523 15,440 90 172 5,500 24 524 15,787 90 168 5,500 25 525 17,021 90 157 5,500 26 526 22,527 90 167 51500 LC % 36.67% 40.00% 52.07% 49.45% LC% 32.12% 30.02% 36.51% 24.15% 23.53% 32.93% 25.96% 25.33% 22.55% 26.63% 30.25% 30.10% 36.59% 36.59% 36.59% 35.32% 35.45% 35.53% 35.31% 35.95% 35.95% 35.95% 35.62% 34.84% 32.31% 24.42% 271 527 29,846 90 186 5,500 28 528 18,621 90 184 5,500 29 529 15,469 90 172 5,500 30 530 46,679 90 141 5,500 31 531 47,788 90 140 5,500 ?S 0 Lots Lot Lot Area Lot Width (SF) (Feet) Lot Depth (Feet) lmperviou s Area S 1 101 18,389 75 151 4,400 2 102 11,184 75 148 4,400 3 103 11,081 75 148 4,400 4 104 11,081 75 148 4,400 5 105 11,081 75 148 4,400 6 106 11,081 75 148 4,400 7 107 11,081 75 148 4,400 8 108 11,081 75 148 4,400 9 109 11,081 75 148 4,400 10 110 11,081 75 148 4,400 65 1't Lots Lot Lot Area Lot Width (SF) (Feet) Lot Depth (Feet) lmperviou s Area S 1 301 9,993 65 125 4,400 2 302 8,450 65 125 4,400 3 303 8,450 65 125 4,400 4 304 8,450 65 125 4,400 5 305 8,450 65 125 4,400 6 306 8,450 65 125 4,400 7 307 11,132 65 125 4,400 8 308 11,244 65 152 4,400 9 309 10,672 65 166 4,400 10 310 12,460 65 193 4,400 11 311 15,421 65 240 4,400 12 312 11,215 65 133 4,400 13 313 10,404 65 160 4,400 14 314 11,607 65 170 4,400 15 315 10,622 65 158 4.400 16 316 11,545 65 136 4,400 17 317 14,532 65 129 4.400 18 318 12,761 65 135 4,400 19 319 13,019 65 131 4,400 20 320 10,858 65 142 4,400 21 321 1887 65 168 4.400 22 322 10,502 65 162 4,400 23 323 9,306 65 143 4,400 18.43% 29.54% 35.55% 11.78% 11.51% 23.93% 39.34% 39.71% 39.71% 39.71% 39.71% 39.71% 39.71% 39.71% 39.71% 44.03% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 39.53% 39.13% 41.23% 35.31% 28.53% 39.23% 42.29% 37.91% 41.42% 38.11% 30.28% 34.48% 33.80% 40.52% 40.42% 41.90% 47.28% 241 324 10,263 1 65 122 1 4,400 25 325 10,020 65 122 4,400 26 326 9,385 65 145 4,400 27 327 10,984 65 164 4,400 28 328 10,228 65 150 4,400 29 329 8,474 65 126 4,400 30 330 8,474 65 126 4,400 31 331 8,776 65 125 4,400 32 332 8,864 65 125 4,400 33 333 13,586 65 99 4,400 34 334 14,313 65 142 4,400 35 335 12,790 65 131 4,400 36 336 12,963 65 132 4,400 37 337 14,449 65 133 4,400 38 338 11,360 65 130 4,400 39 339 11,011 65 124 4,400 40 340 10,508 65 158 4,400 41 341 11,458 65 154 4,400 42 342 13,033 65 138 4,400 43 343 12,790 65 131 4,400 44 344 12,940 65 131 4,400 45 345 12,790 65 131 4,400 46 346 9,728 65 143 4,400 47 347 10,036 65 148 4,400 48 348 10,303 65 124 4,400 49 349 8,933 65 130 4.400 50 350 9,242 65 130 4,400 51 351 9,242 65 130 4,400 52 352 9,242 65 130 4,400 53 353 9,236 65 130 4,400 54 354 8,450 65 130 4,400 55 355 8,450 65 130 4,400 56 356 8,450 65 130 4,400 57 357 8,450 65 130 4,400 58 358 8,450 65 130 4,400 59 359 8,801 65 130 4,400 60 360 15,319 65 130 4,400 61 361 11,772 65 140 4,400 62 362 9,453 65 145 4,400 63 363 9,780 65 145 4,400 64 364 8,497 65 131 4,400 65 365 8,450 65 130 4,400 66 366 8,450 65 F 130 4.400 671 367 1 8,450 1 65 1 130 4,400 42.87% 43.91% 46.88% 40.06% 43.02% 51.92% 51.92% 50.14% 49.64% 32.39% 30.74% 34.40% 33.94% 30.45% 38.73% 39.96% 41.87% 38.40% 33.76% 34.40% 34.00% 34.40% 45.23% 43.84% 42.71% 49.26% 47.61% 47.61% 47.61% 47.64% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 49.99% 28.72% 37.38% 46.55% 44.99% 51.78% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 681 368 8,450 1 61 130 4,400 69 369 8,450 65 130 4,400 70 370 8,749 65 130 4,400 71 371 9,189 65 133 4,400 72 372 9,390 65 133 4,400 73 373 9,313 65 132 4,400 74 374 8,922 65 116 4,400 75 375 12,754 65 97 4,400 76 376 8,474 65 130 4,400 77 377 8,450 130 4,400 78 378 8,450 65 130 4,400 79 379 8,450 65 130 4,400 80 380 8,450 65 130 4,400 81 381 8,450 65 130 4,400 82 382 10,504 65 141 4,400 83 383 11,092 65 141 4,400 84 384 8,819 65 130 4,400 85 385 8,450 65 130 4,400 86 386 8,729 65 131 4,400 87 387 12,658 65 127 4,400 88 388 10,192 65 128 4,400 89 389 9,559 65 131 4,400 90 390 9,104 65 140 4,400 91 391 9,702 65 141 4,400 92 392 14,151 65 136 4,400 93 393 9,676 65 139 4,400 94 394 8,779 65 136 4,400 95 395 8,570 65 133 4,400 96 396 9,103 65 139 4,400 97 397 9,344 65 143 4,400 98 398 9,170 65 140 4,400 99 399 10,929 65 133 4,400 100 400 12,265 65 142 4,400 101 401 9,984 65 138 4,400 102 402 10,465 65 144 4,400 103 403 11,434 65 165 4,400 104 404 12,108 65 174 4,400 105 405 12,591 65 192 4,400 106 406 12,589 65 181 4,400 107 407 12,101 65 174 4,400 108 408 10,764 65 I50 4,400 10"409 9,554 65 133 4,400 110 410 11,046 65 135 4,400 111 411 12,618 1 65 173 4,400 52.07% 52.07% 50.29% 47.88% 46.86% 47.25% 49.32% 34.50% 51.92% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 41.89% 39.67% 49.89% 52.07% 50.41% 34.76% 43.17% 46.03% 48.33% 45.35% 31.09% 45.47% 50.12% 51.34% 48.34% 47.09% 47.98% 40.26% 35.87% 44.07% 42.04% 38.48% 36.34% 34.95% 34.95% 36.36% 40.88% 46.05% 39.83% 34.87% 1121 412 14,656 1 65 237 1 4,400 113 413 14,357 65 250 4,400 114 414 14,285 65 233 4,400 115 415 13,661 65 210 7,400 116 416 12,931 65 167 4,400 55 it Lots Lot Lot Area Lot Width (SF) (Feet) Lot Depth (Feet) Impervioo s Area SF 1 201 11,262 55 115 3,400 2 202 8,851 55 148 3,400 3 203 8,645 55 146 3,400 4 204 8,659 55 146 3,400 5 205 8,894 55 149 3,400 6 206 91079 55 156 3,400 7 207 9,043 55 165 3,400 8 208 8,470 55 132 3,400 9 209 13,623 55 115 3,400 10 210 10,635 55 137 3,400 11 211 11,580 55 139 3,400 12 212 10,688 55 132 3,600 13 213 13,820 55 124 3,600 14 214 9,059 55 164 3,400 15 215 7,285 55 132 3,400 16 216 7,285 55 132 3,400 17 217 7,488 55 133 3,400 18 218 9,065 55 131 3,400 19 219 8,605 55 124 3,400 20 220 6,824 55 122 3,400 21 221 7,222 55 140 3,400 22 222 8,456 55 168 3,400 23 223 11,920 55 176 3,400 24 224 10,548 55 128 3,400 25 225 7,164 55 131 3,400 26 226 9,284 55 127 3,600 27 227 8,832 55 126 3,600 28 228 6,875 55 125 3,400 29 229 6,875 55 125 3,400 30 230 6,875 55 125 3,400 31 231 6,875 55 125 3,400 32 232 6,875 55 125 3,400 33 233 7,651 55 126 3,400 34 234 10,745 55 142 3,400 30.02% 30.65% 30.80% 32.21% 34.03% 30.19% 38.41% 39.33% 39.27% 38.23% 37.45% 37.60% 40.14% 24.96% 31.97% 29.36% 33.68% 26.05% 37.53% 46.67% 46.67% 45.41% 37.51% 39.51% 49.82% 47.08% 40.21% 28.52% 32.23% 47.46% 38.78% 40.76% 49.45% 49.45% 49.45% 49.45% 49.45% 44.44% 31.64% Events / Meeting Timeline • November 2017— Contacted by Jon Rausch regarding sale of Property • November 2017 thru May 2018— Present and negotiate offers for purchase of Property and attend several meetings with city staff to understand goals and objectives for development of Property. • May 2018 — Execute agreement to purchase Galpin Property • June 4, 2018 — Introduce proposed development plans for Property and conduct walking tour of Property with City Council, Planning Commission and Park and Rec Commission •1 June 11, 2018 - City Council Workshop — Discuss "Yield Plan' and "Density Transfer Plan". Present floor plans and elevations of house styles contemplated for proposed development. • June 26, 2018 — Park and Rec Commission - Present concept plan and discuss idea of density transfer to preserve open space. • July 17, 2018 — Planning Commission Meeting - public hearing to discuss PUD Concept Plan • August 13, 2018 — City Council Meeting— public hearing to discuss PUD Concept Plan • November 28, 2018 — Neighborhood Meeting to present "draft" PUD Preliminary Plat • December 3, 2018— City Council Work Session — Present updated PUD Preliminary Plat and provide summary of comments from Neighborhood Meeting • January 15, 2019 —Planning Commission Meeting —public hearing to consider Rezoning, PUD, Wetland Alteration Permit and Subdivision • January 22, 2019 — Park and Rec Commission — review park dedication requirements for proposed PUD Subdivision. January 28, 2019 — City Council Work Session — discuss issues relating to current plan for PUD and Subdivision. • February 11, 2019 — City Council Work Session — discuss changes to plan based on PC Meeting and the work session on January 28, 2019 • March 5, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting at request of City Council to review most current plan with 181 lots. • March 11, 2019 - City Council Meeting to hold public hearing and consider preliminary plat/rezoning/PUD GALPIN PROPERTY (draft) NOTES/COMMENTS The intent in using the PUD process as stated in the ordinance is that"...the city has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal...". The ordinance encourages the following: • "Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environment features..." • "More efficient and effective land use..." • "High quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land use... building architecture should reflect higher quality design than is found elsewhere in the community " "Sensitive development... "...affordable to all income groups if appropriate within the PUD". "Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs... Some thoughts on the proposal. If the site has been manipulated to force a concept that maximizes the number of lots creating a cookie cutter plan lacking character and interest, why not modify the landscape to create a product that results in a model neighborhood that provides options for families, links open space, allows for a diversity of architecture form and life style. Cluster design is not a new concept it has been around since the 60's. Applying the concept to this site could create "fingers" of development that would: • Create mini -neighborhoods through "finger" cul-de-sac design • Provide connections to open space that enhance the experience of living in the neighborhood. Access to all • Preserve wetlands/mature woods and wildlife habitat. • Provide neighborhood facilities (centralized) • Promote active life-style • Create a "special" place to live • Sensible land use... efficient planning • Walkable neighborhood • Commons Strengthen "ed GtJPOA kt a fiV-7 Q u -e a PIJS, (3 faY&fcz Others features that would make this neighborhood "the place to live" in Chanhassen with amenities that attract and retain. This site is well positioned in Chanhassen to benefit from community resources... parks, schools, open space, trails, transit, commercial. Good site design considers intrinsic characteristics of the land, adapts to the landscape and creates value through attention to flow, reveal, form and balance. Elements to be included: • Vary setbacks so that the streetscape doesn't look like a picket fence of similar structures • Vary 1 and 2 story elements along the street • 75% of all houses designed with the garage entry 900 to the street. Garage ends to the street to include windows • All driveways concrete • Centralize mailboxes within each neighborhood • Provide a concrete sidewalk on one side of all streets • Low profile street lights (LED). Style/lumens to be determined. More poles vs. taller poles • Based on the tree inventory new trees (minimum 4" caliper) should be planted as replacements for Oak, Cherry, Maple and Basswood lost to construction at at rate of 2 trees/every 16" and greater diameter tree lost. This should be considered in additional to trees required by code and would be planted in common areas. It is estimated that over 95% of the 2600 inventoried trees will be removed. • Minimum lot size will depend on design type/neighborhood group. • Minimum front lot width depends on proposed zones of development but will not include averages. If Lennar proposal is approved then minimums: 55', 75' and 90' fixed not average. Planning Commission to approve minimum width. • Minimum set back from ROW 20' • Hardwood trees removed should be repurposed not chipped i.e. Wood in the Hood. • Minimum of 30' planting/berm buffer on the south property line (Majestic Oaks) and along Galpin Boulevard • Protect options for home owners by restricting site coverage in the initial phase thereby providing for future construction i.e. deck, patio, porch without a variance. • New slopes (fill) created during site grading shall not exceed 15%. If retaining walls are required they should not exceed 4' and be screen with shrubs/trees. • If building exterior finish material changes from the street face to side wall the primary material (street side) must extend a minimum of 24" on each side wall. • No RV, boat, trailer parking on site • Parking bays for visitor parking along primary drive. Size/location to be determined • Outlots for all trail connections • Community building and grounds for the development including craft space, pool, picnic, play, community garden, meeting space, etc. Example: Ashling Meadows • Public vs. Private streets??? • Monument (signature) & divided road entry off Galpin Boulevard. Example: Long Acres. • Common space connections to wetlands, woods and community trails • Speed control on main drive. • Stockpile topsoil for reuse. Test and blend as required prior to reuse. • Wayfinding signage throughout the site • Multigenerational design • Stormwater filtration/reuse for common area irrigation • Lighted trails What will make this the neighborhood to live in and create long term value? GALPIN PROPERTY (draft) NOTES/COMMENTS The intent in using the PUD process as stated in the ordinance is that"...the city has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal...". The ordinance encourages the following: • "Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environment features..." • "More efficient and effective land use..." • "High quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land use ... building architecture should reflect higher quality design than is found elsewhere in the community. " • "Sensitive development... • "...affordable to all income groups if appropriate within the PUD". • "Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs..." Some thoughts on the proposal. If the site has been manipulated to force a concept that maximizes the number of lots creating a cookie cutter plan lacking character and interest, why not modify the landscape to create a product that results in a model neighborhood that provides options for families, links open space, allows for a diversity of architecture form and life style. Cluster design is not a new concept it has been around since the 60's. Applying the concept to this site could create "fingers" of development that would: • Create mini -neighborhoods through "finger" cul-de-sac design • Provide connections to open space that enhance the experience of living in the neighborhood. Access to all • Preserve wetlands/mature woods and wildlife habitat. Strengthen "edges" • Provide neighborhood facilities (centralized) • Promote active life-style • Create a "special" place to live • Sensible land use ... efficient planning • Walkable neighborhood • Commons Others features that would make this neighborhood "the place to live" in Chanhassen with amenities that attract and retain. This site is well positioned in Chanhassen to benefit from community resources... parks, schools, open space, trails, transit, commercial. Good site design considers intrinsic characteristics of the land, adapts to the landscape and creates value through attention to flow, reveal, form and balance. Elements to be included: • Vary setbacks so that the streetscape doesn't look like a picket fence of similar structures • Vary 1 and 2 story elements along the street i In response to the Fire Marshall's comments regarding the 1376' cul-de-sac I believe there is a solution to reduce the length to 750'-800' (see sketch below). It would necessitate Lennar possibly losing a couple lots and accessing the easterly cul-de-sac from Ruby Lane. The issue with the neighbors to the north was the through traffic and loss of buffer. This would provide a viable alternate that would address the Fire Marshall's issue without yet another variance. i John Tietz jtietz81 c(D.gmail.com (612)670 -9412 MI [(I 1 •I �:nl Hr'. to - �.i c. 1 I r ' i VI r. :�r.sat.nt .R 1Tita tYA K ID`/LLx lNgl 6 YlCt yAr C IWi� t. LI114 II iWIlYS41. ' s urn sr Itrro� •Q NYt C�6 uwtit.ollhAW m rnun te:x - SI nvulb ruKr gactm� rm esma sun m i John Tietz jtietz81 c(D.gmail.com (612)670 -9412 MI [(I 1 •I �:nl Hr'. to - �.i c. 1 I r ' i VI Galpin Property City of Chanhassen Introduction U.S. Home Corporation, d/b/a Lennar is proposing to develop Galpin Property (actual name TBD) in a manner that is sensitive to the environment and surrounding area. With this application we are submitting two conceptual scenarios. The first scenario is a `lot yield' plan that has 202 homes and demonstrates how the property could be developed following the existing RSF zoning standards with one standard lot width and home style for the entire property. The second scenario is a `density transfer' plan that has 199 homes with varying lot sizes demonstrating how the property could be developed through the use of a PUD that will offer diverse housing opportunities and price points accompanied by the preservation of open space. Background/History In November 2017 the property was listed for sale by Comerica Bank; Trust NA, as personal representatives of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson and Paisley Park Enterprises. On several occasions the seller's agents and members of Lennar have met with City staff to begin reviewing the zoning standards and the best use for the property. In May of 2018 U.S. Home Corporation entered into an Option Agreement to purchase the property. Property Description The site consists of approximately 188 acres made up of several tax parcels (PID 25.6900010, 25.6900020, 25.6900030, 25.0100100, and 25.0100200) located in the Notheast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 23. All buildings have been removed and the property has been vacant for some time. The site suffers from frequent trespassers that use the property for walking trails. City Standards • Land Use designation The property is designated for Low Density residential: RSF 1.2-4 units per acre. Lot yield Plan —1.46 DU/Acre (202/138) Concept Plan — 2.26 DU/Acre (199/88) • Zoning Classification The site is currently zoned as Rural Residential with underlying zoning of RSF; low density residential 1.2-4 units per acre. The lot yield plan follows RSF standards and has a density of 1.46. The density transfer plan requires a zoning I change to PUD to allow flexibility and the relaxation of strict application of the zoning ordinance in exchange for greater environmental sensitivity and preservation of open space for public use. At 2.26 units per acre the density transfer plan also fits within the RSF density classification. • Surrounding Land Uses Residential developments of varying densities surround the site to the North, South, and West. To the West, across Galpin is Long Acres which was developed as a PUD to allow flexibility in design standards. Our primary street connections appropriately line up with Hunter Drive and Long Acres Drive. Boarding the property to the North and South are existing neighborhoods zoned RSF. The existing neighborhood to the North (Ashling Meadows) provides two existing road stubs to the subject property. There are no road connections to the South. Lake Lucy, and Lake Ann and their surrounding wetlands are located to the East. Both Ashling Meadows and Long Acres were built by Lennar under the Lundgren Bros Construction name. On the North end, both plans mirror the lot dimensions of the existing neighborhood. Topographical challenges naturally make the North portion of the site more conducive to a wider home style that may not require as much depth for building pads. On the South end of the property the `lot yield' plan shows nine homes backing to the existing neighborhood to the South. The density transfer concept mitigates the visual impacts of smaller lots to the existing neighborhood by incorporating the use of cul-de-sacs and by limiting the home -style in that location to a single story Villa. In this scenario eleven homes will be visible to the existing neighborhood but will be orientated in a manner that attempts to minimize the number that back directly to the existing homes. Open Space Preservation The City of Chanhassen's 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies significant trail improvements along the Eastern boundary of the property that would enhance the Lake Ann Park and trail system by completing important connections between Lake Ann, Lake Lucy and Galpin Road. As part of this application we have provided two conceptual plans. The first scenario is a `lot yield' plan that follows the City's land use designation for the property and conforms to the minimum lot sizes and setbacks allowed within the RSF and Shoreland Overlay district. Park dedication would follow the Cities requirements as described in City Code. The second scenario is the `density transfer' plan that focuses housing development closer to Galpin and preserves approximately 50 acres of land adjacent to Lake Lucy and Lake Ann that could be used for park dedication to the City. The overall lot count in both scenarios is roughly 200 homes. The difference between the two lies in the concentration of acreage used. In scenario one approximately 138 acres K are being developed to reach 200 homes. By mixing lot sizes scenario two strategically places the same 200 homes on 88 acres of land giving the opportunity to preserve significantly more open space for use by the residents of Chanhassen. Preserving the open space in this manner not only minimizes environmental impacts but also significantly reduces the length of public infrastructure (sewer, water, roads) required for long term maintenance by the City. Building Plans/Product Information Extensive research on housing availability and market conditions within the City of Chanhassen has guided us in putting together a plan that is matched by a product portfolio that includes an architecturally interesting variety of homes, and price points, that meet multiple buyer niches in Galpin Property. • Landmark Series - Designed with efficiency in mind, the Landmark series meets the demands of today's challenging housing market by offering a fantastic value planned specially for 65' wide homesites. Lennar has successfully built the Landmark series in Reflections at Lake Riley, Boulder Cove, and Camden Ridge. Typical footprints are 50' wide allowing the ability to maintain setbacks designated by zoning standards. A variety of houseplans and elevations make up this series offering square footages ranging from 2,200 sq ft to 3,200 sq ft plus the ability to finish the basement to add footage to the home. With families in mind, the homes typically include four bedrooms, a large open living space on the main level, a master suite, mud room, and three car garage. Sixty-five foot wide lots allow the ability to preserve open space without compromising the integrity of the neighborhood. Typical side yard setbacks will be maintained. An interesting streetscape will be maintained through the incorporation of a variety of elevations, materials, and color packages. Lots are arranged in a manner that will include an assortment of walk -outs, look -outs, and flats. • Traditional Series - The Traditional series is designed for the 90' wide homesites with the move up buyer in mind. A variety of house plans will be offered ranging from 2,600 sq ft to 3,700 sq ft. plus the ability to finish the basement to add additional footage to the home. These well thought out plans typically include four bedrooms, a large open living space on the main level, master suite, craft room, three car garage, and allow for luxury upgrades such as an indoor sport court. No deviation from RSF standards is requested in the large lot area. An interesting streetscape will be maintained through the incorporation of a variety of elevations, materials, and color packages. Luxury Villa — The Luxury Villa is designed for the 55' wide homesites along the Southern Boarder. The Luxury provides minimal maintenance housing for an underserved market in Chanhassen; and the Twin Cities in general, the 'empty nester'. Designed for single level living, the Villa homes offer a spacious first floor that includes a master suite, fireplace, open living room, gourmet kitchen, 3 and study. A deck or three season porch is included with the home to allow the opportunity to enjoy the natural features of Galpin Property . Multiple elevations and color packages will be incorporated to reduce monotony. It is important to note that the lot yield plan would be made up of all Traditional Series homes. Based on our absorption forecasts and financial modeling it is a possible that we would need to sell off portions of the lots to other builders. Environmental Impacts • Wetlands - A wetland delineation was completed on the site in September 2017. Wetland impacts have been minimized by careful planning and the preservation of open space. The `lot yield' plan will require more impact to existing wetlands for the extension of public infrastructure (sewer, water, streets) to serve the upland adjacent to Lake Ann and Lake Lucy. Tree Preservation — Preservation of open space for public use will allow the opportunity to preserve large wooded areas that may otherwise be disturbed with development. The `lot yield' concept that follows the existing zoning guidelines will have a much greater impact on the large stands of trees located in the upland areas fronting Lake Ann and Lake Lucy. Water Quality — Water quality will be managed through the incorporation of on- site ponding and other appropriate erosion control measures. We are evaluating the potential for water re -use on site to supplement irrigation systems. Lennar is committed to following stormwater policies enacted by the City of Chanhassen and the Minnesota Pollution Control Association (MPCA). Homeowners Association(s) A Master Homeowners Association will be established to maintain private common areas and community monuments. In the density transfer concept a Sub -Association will be created to take care of the common elements within the Villa area. The Villa will be `full maintenance' in nature to include; professional management, mowing, plowing, and exterior upkeep of the homes. Owners of detached single family homes will be responsible for their own upkeep and maintenance subject to City Ordinance and Architectural Controls established within the Master Association. Summary Lennar has a long history of building successful Communities in the City of Chanhassen under the names Lennar, Ryland, Lundgren Bros. Construction, and Orrin Thompson Homes. We are very excited for the opportunity that lends itself through the careful development of this fantastic property and ask for your support. 1d Project Team Developer: U.S. Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar Builder: Lennar Corporation Primary Contact: Joe Jablonski Planner/Engineer/Surveyor: Pioneer Engineering Wetland Specialist: TBD Landscape Architect: Pioneer Engineering Legal Council: Vantage Law Group Association Manager: TBD Project summary (US Home/Lennar) Galpin Property —188 Gross Acres Scenario # 1 Total Homesites — 202 Approximate Developed Area — 138 acres Open Space — 50 acres Traditonal homesites — 202 Average Lot — 90' wide Scenario # 2 Total Homesites —199 Approximate Developed Area = 88 Acres Open Space = 100 Acres Traditional homesites — 45 Average Lot — 90' wide Landmark Homesites —102 Average Lot — 65' wide Villa Homesites — 52 Average Lot — 55' wide Pe aoi 1� -oj Galpin Property City of Chanhassen Introduction U.S. Home Corporation, d/b/a Lennar is proposing to develop Galpin Property (actual name TBD) in a manner that is sensitive to the environment and surrounding area. With this Preliminary Plat we are submitting a plan that has taken into account input from public leaders, staff, and neighbors. Our plan has 191 homes demonstrating how the property can be developed through the use of a PUD that will offer diverse housing opportunities and price points accompanied by the preservation of open space. Background/History In November 2017 the property was listed for sale by Comerica Bank; Trust NA, as personal representatives of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson and Paisley Park Enterprises. On several occasions the seller's agents and members of Lennar have met with City staff to begin reviewing the zoning standards and the best use for the property. In May of 2018 U.S. Home Corporation entered into an Option Agreement to purchase the property. Property Description The site consists of approximately 188 acres made up of several tax parcels (PID 25.6900010, 25.6900020, 25.6900030, 25.0100100, and 25.0100200) located in the Notheast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 116, Range 23. All buildings have been removed and the property has been vacant for some time. The site suffers from frequent trespassers that use the property for walking trails. City Standards • Land Use designation The property is designated for Low Density residential: RSF 1.24 units per acre. Pre -plat — 2.15 DU/Acre (191/88) • Zoning Classification The site is currently zoned as Rural Residential with underlying zoning of RSF; low density residential 1.24 units per acre. Our plan requires a zoning change to PUD to allow flexibility and the relaxation of strict application of the zoning ordinance in exchange for greater environmental sensitivity and preservation of open space for public use. At 2.15 units per acre our plan also fits within the RSF density classification. 43NNVOS 2 Surrounding Land Uses Residential developments of varying densities surround the site to the North, South, and West. To the West, across Galpin is Long Acres which was developed as a PUD to allow flexibility in design standards. Our primary street connections appropriately line up with Hunter Drive and Long Acres Drive. Boarding the property to the North and South are existing neighborhoods zoned RSF. The existing neighborhoods to the North (Ashling Meadows and Lucy Ridge) provide road stubs to the subject property. There are no road connections to the South. Lake Lucy, and Lake Ann and their surrounding wetlands are located to the East. Plan modifications since initial concept review Overall • 50+ acres designated for City Park • Lot count has been reduced to 191 homesites (2.15 DU/Acre) • Stormwater ponding has been incorporated to accommodate Galpin Rd upgrades • Perimeter buffering has been evaluated North end • Through street from Galpin to Lucy Ridge has been eliminated • Buffering through preservation has been identified • 14 Lots have been eliminated to minimize environmental impacts South end • Density in Southern 1/3 of the property has decreased • Lots along Southern property line have been enlarged from 55' wide to 75' wide to accommodate standard homes rather than Villa. • Storm sewer and Emergency Overflows have been identified to alleviate water issues in adjacent neighborhood Back yard areas along South property line have been expanded allowing for the preservation of existing trees Landscape buffering has been integrated into the plan Open Space Preservation The City of Chanhassen's 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies significant trail improvements along the Eastern boundary of the property that would enhance the Lake Ann Park and trail system by completing important connections between Lake Ann, Lake Lucy and Galpin Road. Our plan for the Galpin property focuses housing development closer to Galpin and preserves approximately 50 acres of land adjacent to Lake Lucy and Lake Ann that could be used for park dedication to the City. By mixing lot sizes our plan strategically places 3 the 191 homes on 88 acres of land giving the opportunity to preserve significantly more open space for use by the residents of Chanhassen then would be available if strict RSF zoning standards were followed. Preserving the open space in this manner not only minimizes environmental impacts but also significantly reduces the length of public infrastructure (sewer, water, roads) required for long term maintenance by the City. Building Plans/Product Information Extensive research on housing availability and market conditions within the City of Chanhassen has guided us in putting together a plan that is matched by a product portfolio that includes architecturally interesting variety of homes, and price points, that meet multiple buyer niches. Landmark Series - Designed with efficiency in mind, the Landmark series meets the demands of today's challenging housing market by offering a fantastic value planned specially for 65'& 75' wide homesites. Lennar has successfully built the Landmark series in Reflections at Lake Riley, Boulder Cove, and Camden Ridge. Typical footprints are 50' wide allowing the ability to maintain setbacks designated by zoning standards. A variety of houseplans and elevations make up this series offering square footages ranging from 2,200 sq ft to 3,200 sq ft plus the ability to finish the basement to add footage to the home. With families in mind, the homes typically include four bedrooms, a large open living space on the main level, a master suite, mud room, and three car garage. Sixty-five foot wide lots allow the ability to preserve open space without compromising the integrity of the neighborhood. Typical side yard setbacks will be maintained. An interesting streetscape will be maintained through the incorporation of a variety of elevations, materials, and color packages. Lots are arranged in a manner that will include an assortment of walk -outs, look -outs, and flats. Luxury Villa — The 34 Luxury Villa are designed for the 55' wide homesites just North of the Southern entrance. The Luxury Villa provides minimal maintenance housing for an underserved market in Chanhassen; and the Twin Cities in general, the `empty nester'. Designed for single level living, the Villa homes offer a spacious first floor that includes a master suite, fireplace, open living room, gourmet kitchen, and study. A deck or three season porch is included with the home to allow the opportunity to enjoy the natural features of Galpin Property . Multiple elevations and color packages will be incorporated to reduce monotony. Traditional - The 31 Traditional homesites on the North end of the property are currently being marketed for sale to custom homebuilders. Lennar may elect to participate in the construction of some homes in that area. 4 Environmental Impacts • Wetlands - A wetland delineation was completed on the site in September 2017 and was followed by a Wetland classification analysis. Wetland impacts have been minimized by careful planning and the preservation of open space. Following RSF standards for the entire property would require more impact to existing wetlands for the extension of public infrastructure (sewer, water, streets) to serve the upland adjacent to Lake Ann and Lake Lucy. • Tree Preservation — Preservation of open space for public use will allow the opportunity to preserve large wooded areas that may otherwise be disturbed with development. Tree replacement as required by code has been factored into the landscape plan. Following the RSF zoning guidelines would have a much greater impact on the large stands of trees located in the upland areas fronting Lake Ann and Lake Lucy that are contemplated by Public Park with this plan. • Water Quality — Water quality will be managed through the incorporation of on- site ponding and other appropriate erosion control measures. We are evaluating the potential for water re -use on site to supplement irrigation systems. Lennar is committed to following stormwater policies enacted by the City of Chanhassen and the Minnesota Pollution Control Association (MPCA). Plans have been submitted to the Riley Purgatory Watershed to allow for the simultaneous review of stormwater management designs. Flexibility through the use of PUD Our plan requires a zoning change to PUD to allow flexibility and the relaxation of strict application of the zoning ordinance in exchange for greater environmental sensitivity and preservation of open space for public use. The items we are requesting flexibility include; lot width and area, cul de sac length, and relaxation of front setbacks along the North and South boarders. All three items are requested for consideration to allow for the preservation of open space and trees. Homeowners Association(s) A Master Homeowners Association will be established to maintain private common areas and community monuments. A Sub -Association will be created to take care of the common elements within the Villa area. The Villa will be `full maintenance' in nature to include; professional management, mowing, plowing, and exterior upkeep of the homes. Owners of single family homes will be responsible for their own upkeep and maintenance subject to City Ordinance and Architectural Controls established within the Master Association. k Summary Lennar has a long history of building successful Communities in the City of Chanhassen under the names Lennar, Ryland, Lundgren Bros. Construction, and Orrin Thompson Homes. We are very excited for the opportunity that lends itself through the careful development of this fantastic property and ask for your support. Project Team Developer: U.S. Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar Builder: Lennar Corporation Primary Contact: Joe Jablonski Planner/Engineer/Surveyor: Pioneer Engineering Wetland Specialist: TBD Landscape Architect: Pioneer Engineering Legal Council: Vantage Law Group Association Manager: TBD Project summary (US Home/Lennar) Galpin Property —188 Gross Acres Total Homesites —191 Approximate Developed Area — 89 acres Open Space — 50 acres Preserved wetlands — 49 acres Traditional homesites — 31 Average Lot — 90' wide Landmark Homesites —126 Average Lot — 65' wide Villa Homesites — 34 Average Lot — 55' wide 91 Examples of issues with smaller residential lots abutting natural resources or easements. General Observations: 1. Smaller lots with large footprint houses and three car garages can struggle to accommodate accessory uses like patios and storage sheds. 2. When homeowners do not have adequate rear yard space and abut outlots, there is a tendency for people to expand their yards into these areas. 3. Homeowners are not always aware of easements and when easements run through the rear yards of properties issue can arise when homeowners want to construct accessory structures in those areas. Examples: Pioneer Pass: Zoned RLM "Residential Low and Medium Density" Min. Lot Area I Front Setback I Rear Setback Side Setbacks Lot Cover Limit 9,000 sq. ft. 25' 25'* 5' garage, 10' house 35% *Property's along the northern portion of the development abut the bluff creek primary zone and have an additional 40' structure setback, the first 20' of which may not be graded or disturbed. The red line in the above picture shows the approximate location of the Bluff Creek Overlay district's "do not disturb" area. Notice that many of the homeowners have extend their lawn into that area and, in some cases, into the City owned preserve behind their property. Patios, retaining walls, playsets, and fire pits have also been construed within the do not disturb area, and, in one case, on the outlot dedicated to the City. Summerrield: Zoned PUD -R "Planned Unit Development -Residential Min. Lot Area Front Setback Rear Setback* Side Setbacks I Lot Cover Limit 11,000 sq. ft. 30' 30' 110, J 25% *Rear yards of some properties are encumbered by a 60' pipeline easement. The yellow rectangle behind the homes roughly corresponds to the 60' pipeline easement. The owner of the northern home discovered the existence of the pipeline easement when they applied for a permit to expand their deck and patio. They were unhappy to discover that their expansion plans were not possible and that a portion of their existing patio needed to be removed. The second and third houses from the top have a large patio and playset, respectively, located entirely within the pipeline easement. There are no permits on file for these structures and if they came to the attention of the easement holder, they would need to be removed. Finally, it appears a homeowner has installed fire pit in the City owned outlot behind the development. Foxwood: Zoned RLM "Residential Low and Medium Density" Min. Lot Area Front Setback RearSetbackSide Setbacks Lot Cover Limit 9,000 sq. ft. 25' 25' 5' garage, 10' house 35% BCOD: Variance was granted reducing bluff creek overlay structure setback to 20'. This lot is bordered on two sides by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The BCOD's setbacks and size of the house that was constructed on the property have combined to leave the owner with very limited options for improving their property. They initially submitted the landscaping plan to the left; however, the retaining walls and fire pit did not meet code. They were surprised and upset to discover that they could construct structures within the red square on the drawing to the right. Staff anticipates other homeowners within this development will have similar issues when they apply for permits to install accessory uses or retaining walls in increase usable yard space. Staff is concerned that fire pits and similar improvements will be constructed without permits near or within the developments BCOD/wetland setbacks or City owned outlots. Mai al1w�O1Cl1� ' (� This lot is bordered on two sides by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The BCOD's setbacks and size of the house that was constructed on the property have combined to leave the owner with very limited options for improving their property. They initially submitted the landscaping plan to the left; however, the retaining walls and fire pit did not meet code. They were surprised and upset to discover that they could construct structures within the red square on the drawing to the right. Staff anticipates other homeowners within this development will have similar issues when they apply for permits to install accessory uses or retaining walls in increase usable yard space. Staff is concerned that fire pits and similar improvements will be constructed without permits near or within the developments BCOD/wetland setbacks or City owned outlots. Personally I find the flyer to be a little deceiving to residents. One image shows the proposed PUD (presented 2 weeks ago) and the other shows an updated rendering of the Concept Plan we reviewed last July. What's the difference? One plan has had significantly more work put against it to determine feasibility (the PUD). The concept plan is literally plopping lots on a page. No engineering work has been done to determine it 4 lots at 60 lots are possible down there OR if access to those lots is possible since both roads in the concept go over wetlands... one a significant wetland. I hope residents understand that difference because it's not a true comparison. In addition, that concept plan received negative comments from all Planning Commission and City Council members including Mayor Laufenburger. Public Comment MEETING Notios of Publio Comment Meeting on the Galpin Boulevard Property 'p Planned Unit Development (PUD) Subdivision to be held Tuesday. M... Medium Density Comparison Chart In order to attempt to make equivalent comparisons of the "developed density" of medium density projects, staff has created a category "Outlot Acres" to account for area within a development that may be developable, but is maintained as common open space, such as upland within the bluff creek overlay district primary zone. The net density of a project is calculated by removing all right-of-way, wetlands, miscellaneous acres, park land, and outlot acres before calculating the density of the development. The adjusted net density adds back into the net area, these common acres included in outlots. Within Liberty on Bluff Creek, the miscellaneous acres represent areas of bluff and the Outlot acres are area within the bluff creek overlay district primary zone. g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-I 1 liberty on bluff creek\medium density comparison chart.doc Ad ueted_ -- -----_-- _ -- - -- - --- GROSS AGES ROW ACRES WETLAND! ACRES MISC. ACRES PARK - OUTLOT ACRES NET A TOTAL T GROSS DEN NET _ NET DENSITY NOTES _ 94-5 PUD Minion Hills/Muttl-fames _ - - 94-18 PUD Autumn Rb a 92.3 PUD Oak Pond/Oak Hills 94-7 SP Prairie Creek Townhomes _ 87-3 PUD Powers Place _ 95.7 SP Lake Susan Hills 7ownhomes 98.3 PUD Tawble nhomes at Creekskle - _. _ 98.4 PUD Walnut Grove (st sm lot towntwuse6 99-2 PUD Arboretum Villa a 9 2003.3 PUD LI�� ana on Bluff Buff Creekreek 111 47.18 11.6 281a 4.29 24.19 2.09 4.6 0 9.7F 0 7.29. 0 _-_ 7.03' 2.18 49.6 8.81 __120.93 21.58 g6.pp, 10 5.87 0 -. _ 1.8 0 0 0 1 0.2 26.291 8: 9�� - --_ - - _ 2_.94 - 3.16 0 - 0 3.09 0 0 0 021 4.52 14.11_ 3.24 7.57 1 t01 2 71 6.98 5 _ _2.14 12.78 25.85 2.44 28.01 28.47 _ - 16.27 _8.2 _ 1.89 _2.72 2.29 _._ _1.5 25.49 30.15 1.39 39.51 208 140 141 24 48 34 ._25 247 342 18 444 4.41 4.98 _ 5.83 5.22 4.95 4.66 3.56 4.96 _ 2.83 2.45 4.88 7.88 8.60 22.74 12 70 1765 14.85 16.67 969 11.34 11.51 11.24 .7.00 1g2.1 lorunle units 5.87 82 affordable - - 8.19 00 eHortlable 522 0 affordable 4.95 OaHordable _ 4.660 affordable _ _ --- 6.87 128 affordable 6.45 128 affoMable 6.11 156 affordable ownership, 2.9 acres commercial 4,16 BCO 8.58 ICO, 8.89w. we8endf3.18 ac. bluff -- SUBTOTAL PERCENT 396.39 60.87 45.88 6.1 21.93 107.73 153.88 11869 AVG 421 10.85 -- • Includes BCO and Oudots In order to attempt to make equivalent comparisons of the "developed density" of medium density projects, staff has created a category "Outlot Acres" to account for area within a development that may be developable, but is maintained as common open space, such as upland within the bluff creek overlay district primary zone. The net density of a project is calculated by removing all right-of-way, wetlands, miscellaneous acres, park land, and outlot acres before calculating the density of the development. The adjusted net density adds back into the net area, these common acres included in outlots. Within Liberty on Bluff Creek, the miscellaneous acres represent areas of bluff and the Outlot acres are area within the bluff creek overlay district primary zone. g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-I 1 liberty on bluff creek\medium density comparison chart.doc �y4e,466 holri Afe4 40 �D t10>01 64 1404* �YVA5� Y N SUN 6/18 MON 6/19 MON 6/26 WED 6/28 THUR 6/29 FRI 6/30 THUR 7/6 FRI 7/7 WED 7/12 FRI 7/14 TU 7/18 THUR 7/20 FRI 7/21 SAT 7/22 SUN 7/23 WED 7/26 6pm 7:30pm 7:30pm 7:30pm 7:30pm 7:30pm 7:30pm 7:30pm 7:30pm 7:30pm 7:30pm 7:30pm 7pm 7:30pm 6pm 7:30pm Chaska Cubs* Chaska Hitdawg Edina Buckshots Champlin LoGators Burnsville Bobcats Lyon's Pub Warriors Hampton Cardinals Coon Rapids Redbirds Waconia Victoria Vics* Eagan Bandits St. Peter Saints Shakopee Indians St. Louis Park Prior Lake Jays Waterville Indians Chanhassen Chanhassen 12 Chanhassen Chanhassen Chanhassen Chanhassen 12 Chanhassen Chanhassen Chanhassen Chanhassen Chanhassen Chanhassen B Chanhassen ' Chanhassen Chanhassen Chanhassen JUNE 19, 7:30PM Redbirds vs. Chaska Hitdawg Dollar Dawg Night JUNE 29, 7:30PM Redbirds vs. BumsviIle Bobcats Lakeside Promotions Night City of Chanhassen Night JULY 20, 7:30PM Redbirdsys. SC PeterSaints Mediacom Night JULY 21, 7PM Redbirdsys. Shakopeelndians Fan Appreciation Night Sponsored by Americlnn JULY 23, 61PM Redbirdsys. Pdorlake Jays C.H. Robinson Night ALL home games played at Chanhassen H.S. Storm/Red Bird Stadium 2200 LYMAN BOULEVARD. CHANHASSEN 'league Game To get the latest Red Bird news, schedule updates, ticket Information, game results, and statistics at: www.chanredbirds.org in Chanhassen Red Birds Baseball Team E% @chanredbirds Schedule subject to change. • An applicant for a permit under this rule must demonstrate, using a model utilizing the most recent applicable National Weather Service reference data (e.g., Atlas 14), that the implementation of its stormwater management plan will: Limit peak runoff flow rates to that from existing conditions for the two-, to- and roo-year frequency storm events using a nested 24-hour rainfall distribution, and a roo-year frequency, today snowmelt event, for all points where stormwater discharge leaves the site; • Provide for the abstraction onsite of m inches of runoff from the new or fully reconstructed impervious surface of the parcel; o Soil borings must be provided at all stormwater BMP locations. These must support the infiltration rates used in the design and confirm that the ordinary high groundwater level is at least three feet below the bottom of any proposed filtration or infiltration features. o The narrative notes that ponding will be used. While it may well be that ponding becomes a part of the overall stormwater management strategy, the applicant must first look to abstract Ll inches using the sequencing set forth in Rule J, §3.3. o Infiltration is not the only method of abstraction. The stormwater management must consider other methods of abstraction and discuss the feasibility of these measures such as reuse mentioned in the narrative. Provide for at least sixty percent (6o%) annual removal efficiency for total phosphorus, and at least ninety percent (go%) annual removal efficiency for total suspended solids from site runoff. The onsite abstraction of runoff may be included in demonstrating compliance with the total suspended solids and total phosphorus removal requirements. No structure may be constructed or reconstructed such that its lowest floor elevation is less than a feet above the roo-year event flood elevation and no stormwater management system may be constructed or reconstructed in a manner that brings the low floor elevation of an adjacent structure into noncompliance with this standard. • General Comments: o All stormwater management structures and facilities must be designed for maintenance access and properly maintained in perpetuity. A maintenance and inspection plan must be provided. The maintenance and inspection plan must include specific maintenance requirements for the proprietary BMPs installed. o See Rule J, Section 4 for permit exhibit requirements. Summary Based on the information provided to date, a permit from the RPBCWD will be required prior to construction to likely cover the following: Erosion and Sediment Control, Wetland and Creek Buffer, and Stormwater Management. It is also possible that the Floodplain Management and Drainage Alteration rule will be triggered. The online permit application, rules, maintenance declaration template, and financial assurance templates are available for download on the RPBCWD website: hUp://www.Mhcwd.orgtpermitsL. The District supports and encourages the utilization of Better Site Design and other methods to protect the water quality in Lake Ann as well as the downstream water resources. Thank you for the opportunity to review this concept plan. Please contact us with any questions. GALPIN PROPERTY COMPLIANCE TABLE Lot Lot Area Lot Width Lot Impervious 20 ft * (SF) (Feet) Depth Area (SF) 25 ft 25 ft 7.5 ft (Feet) 50 ft 90 foot 15,000 90 125 5,500 frontage 22,829 90 249 5,500 90 foot 11,250 90 125 5,500 frontage ** 16,733 90 175 5,500 65 ft Lots 8,450 65 125 4,400 Front Setback Rear Setback Side Yard Setback Corner Setback CR 117 Setback 20 ft * 25 ft 7.5 ft 20 ft 50 ft 25 ft 25 ft 7.5 ft 20 ft 50 ft Wetland Buffer Setback 20 ft. *25 ft. with Sidewalk **Lots 101-111 90 -Foot Frontage Lot Lot Area (SF) Lot Width (Feet) Lot Depth (Feet) Impervious Area (SF) 501 18,092 100 177 5,500 502 17,455 90 167 5,500 503 15,030 90 167 5,500 504 22,829 90 249 5,500 505 24,572 90 249 5,500 506 16,733 90 175 5,500 507 18,427 90 201 5,500 508 17,037 90 142 5,500 509 23,848 90 159 5,500 510 20,017 90 137 5,500 511 18,801 90 156 5,500 512 17,844 90 167 5,500 513 15,032 90 167 5,500 514 15,030 90 167 5,500 515 16,667 100 167 5,500 516 15,574 90 175 5,500 517 15,514 90 175 5,500 518 15,482 90 174 5,500 519 15,576 90 174 5,500 520 15,300 90 1 170 5,500 521 15,300 90 170 5,500 522 15,300 90 170 5,500 523 15,440 90 172 5,500 524 15,882 90 168 5,500 525 16,629 90 136 5,500 526 22,359 90 140 5,500 527 27,426 90 143 5,500 528 16,764 90 160 5,500 529 15,371 90 165 5,500 530 44,983 90 165 5,500 531 1 47,788 1 90 125 1 51500 90 -Foot Frontage Lot Lot Area (SF) Lot Width (Feet) Lot Depth Feet Impervious Area (SF) 101 19,897 135 143 5,500 102 13,371 90 148 5,500 103 13,297 90 148 5,500 104 13,297 90 148 5,500 105 13,297 90 148 5,500 106 13,297 90 148 5,500 107 13,297 90 148 5,500 108 13,297 90 148 5,500 109 14,599 90 148 5,500 110 14,840 90 148 5,500 111 25,529 90 148 5,500 312 Avg, 18,479 65 125 4,400 65 -Foot Frontage Lot Lot Area (SF) Lot Width (Feet) Lot Depth Feet Impervious Area (SF) 301 9,993 78 125 4,400 302 8,450 65 125 4,400 303 8,450 65 125 4,400 304 8,450 65 125 4,400 305 8,450 65 125 4,400 306 8,450 65 125 4,400 307 11,132 65 125 4,400 308 13,748 78 131 4,400 309 8,925 65 129 4,400 310 12,282 65 126 4,400 311 1 8,607 65 125 4,400 312 8,126 65 125 4,400 313 8,257 65 125 4,400 314 8,795 65 130 4,400 315 9,683 65 142 4,400 316 12,836 78 125 4,400 317 12,591 78 150 4,400 318 10,414 65 145 4,400 319 10,228 65 145 4,400 320 11,448 65 145 4,400 321 13,180 65 147 4,400 322 12,052 65 145 4,400 323 11,853 65 142 4,400 324 10,767 65 142 4,400 325 9,524 65 139 4,400 326 9,135 65 132 4,400 327 8,609 65 132 4,400 328 8,609 65 132 4,400 329 10,232 65 132 4,400 330 9,750 65 125 4,400 331 9,478 65 125 4,400 332 10,900 65 125 4,400 333 16,107 78 125 4,400 334 11,215 78 136 4,400 335 10,404 65 153 4,400 336 11,607 65 167 4,400 337 10,622 65 142 4,400 338 11,545 65 133 4,400 339 14,532 65 125 4,400 340 12,761 65 125 4,400 341 13,019 65 125 4,400 342 10,858 65 125 4,400 343 10,887 65 163 4,400 344 10,502 65 152 4,400 345 9,306 65 134 4,400 346 10,263 78 125 4,400 347 10,020 78 125 4,400 348 9,385 65 135 4,400 349 10,984 65 154 4,400 350 10,228 65 126 4,400 351 8,474 65 126 4,400 352 8,474 65 125 4,400 353 8,776 65 125 4,400 354 8,864 65 125 4,400 355 13,586 65 131 4,400 356 14,313 65 130 4,400 357 12,790 65 132 4,400 358 12,963 65 125 4,400 359 14,449 65 145 4,400 360 11,360 65 126 4,400 361 11,011 78 125 4,400 362 10,508 65 142 4,400 363 11,458 65 145 4,400 364 13,033 65 130 4,400 365 12,790 65 130 4,400 366 12,940 65 132 4,400 367 12,790 65 130 4,400 368 9,728 65 131 4,400 369 10,036 65 140 4,400 370 10,303 78 125 4,400 371 8,933 65 130 4,400 372 9,242 65 130 4,400 373 9,242 65 130 4,400 374 9,242 65 130 4,400 375 9,236 65 130 4,400 376 8,450 65 130 4,400 377 8,450 65 130 4,400 378 8,450 65 130 4,400 379 8,450 65 130 4,400 380 8,450 65 130 4,400 381 8,801 65 130 4,400 382 15,319 95 130 4,400 383 11,772 78 145 4,400 384 9,453 65 145 4,400 385 9,780 65 145 4,400 386 9,898 65 134 4,400 387 9,263 65 130 4,400 388 8,450 65 130 4,400 389 8,450 65 130 4,400 390 8,450 65 130 4,400 391 8,450 65 130 4,400 392 8,450 65 130 4,400 393 8,749 65 130 4,400 394 9,189 65 130 4,400 395 9,390 65 130 4,400 396 9,313 65 130 4,400 397 8,922 65 134 4,400 398 12,754 78 130 4,400 399 8,474 65 130 4,400 400 8,450 65 130 4,400 401 8,450 65 130 4,400 402 8,450 65 130 4,400 403 8,450 65 130 4,400 404 8,450 65 130 4,400 405 10,504 65 130 4,400 406 11,092 65 130 4,400 407 8,819 65 130 4,400 408 8,450 65 130 4,400 409 8,729 65 130 4,400 410 12,658 78 131 4,400 411 10,192 78 127 4,400 412 9,559 65 127 4,400 413 9,104 65 145 4,400 414 9,702 65 137 4,400 415 14,151 65 135 4,400 416 9,676 65 135 4,400 417 8,779 65 130 4,400 418 8,570 65 130 4,400 419 9,103 65 136 4,400 420 9,344 65 143 4,400 421 9,170 65 1 143 4,400 422 10,929 78 132 4,400 423 12,265 78 142 4,400 424 9,984 65 130 4,400 425 10,465 65 130 4,400 426 11,434 65 159 4,400 427 12,108 65 170 4,400 428 12,591 65 178 4,400 429 12,589 65 178 4,400 430 12,101 65 1 170 4,400 431 10,764 65 130 4,400 432 9,554 65 130 4,400 433 11,046 78 128 4,400 434 12,618 65 141 4,400 435 14,656 65 212 4,400 436 14,357 65 248 4,400 437 14,285 65 248 4,400 438 13,661 65 200 1 4,400 439 12,931 65 134 4,400 Avg. 10,475 GALPIN PROPERTY COMPLIANCE TABLE Wetland Buffer Setback 20 ft. * 25 ft with Sidewalk 90 ft Lots Lot Lot Lot Area (SF) Lot Width (Feet) Lot Depth (Feet) Impervious Area (SF) 90 ft Lots PUD 15,000 90 167 5,500 75 ft Lots PUD 11,000 75 147 4,400 65 ft Lots PUD 8,450 65 130 4,400 55 ft Lots PUD 6,875 55 125 3,400 Wetland Buffer Setback 20 ft. * 25 ft with Sidewalk 90 ft Lots Lot Front Setback Rear Setback Side Yard Setback Corner Setback CR 117 Setback 90 ft Lots 20 ft * 25 ft 7.5 It 20 ft 50 it 75 ft Lots 20 ft 25 it 7.5 It 20 ft 50 it 65 If Lots 25 It 25 It 7.5 It 20 If 50 ft 55 ft Lots 25 If 25 It 7.5 It 20 If 50 ft Wetland Buffer Setback 20 ft. * 25 ft with Sidewalk 90 ft Lots Lot Lot Area (SF) Lot Width (Feet) Lot Depth (Feet) Impervious Area (SF) 501 17,122 90 190 5,500 502 18,322 90 172 5,500 503 15,066 90 166 5,500 504 22,778 90 252 5,500 505 23,376 90 243 5,500 506 16,704 90 189 5,500 507 1 21,184 90 216 5,500 508 21,715 90 135 5,500 509 24,394 90 160 5,500 510 20,655 90 150 5,500 511 18,183 90 170 5,500 512 18,275 90 171 5,500 513 15,030 90 167 5,500 514 15,030 90 167 5,500 515 15,032 90 167 5,500 516 15,574 90 175 5,500 517 15,514 90 175 5,500 518 15,482 90 174 5,500 519 15,576 90 174 5,500 520 15,300 90 170 5,500 521 15,300 90 170 5,500 522 15,300 90 170 5,500 523 15,440 90 172 5,500 524 15,787 90 168 5,500 525 17,021 90 157 5,500 526 22,527 90 167 5,500 527 29,846 90 186 5,500 528 18,621 90 184 5,500 529 15,469 90 172 5,500 530 46,679 90 141 5,500 531 47,788 90 140 5,500 75 It Lots Lot Lot Area (SF) Lot Width (Feet) Lot Depth (Feet) Impervious Area (SF) 101 18,389 75 151 4,400 102 11,184 75 148 4,400 103 11,081 75 148 4,400 104 11,081 75 148 4,400 105 11,081 75 148 4,400 106 1 11,081 1 75 1 148_L 4,400 107 11,081 75 148 4,400 108 11,081 75 148 4,400 109 11,081 75 148 4,400 110 11,081 75 148 4,400 65 It Lots Lot Lot Area (SF) Lot Width (Feet) Lot Depth (Feet) Impervious Area (SF) 301 9,993 65 125 4,400 302 8,450 65 125 4,400 303 8,450 65 125 4,400 304 8,450 65 125 4,400 305 8,450 65 125 4,400 306 8,450 65 125 1 4,400 307 11,132 65 125 4,400 308 11,244 65 152 4,400 309 10,672 65 166 4,400 310 12,460 65 193 4,400 311 15,421 65 240 4,400 312 11,215 65 133 4,400 313 10,404 65 160 4,400 314 11,607 65 170 4,400 315 10,622 65 158 4,400 316 11,545 65 136 4,400 317 14,532 65 129 4,400 318 12,761 65 135 4,400 319 13,019 65 131 4,400 320 1 10,858 65 142 4,400 321 10,887 65 168 4,400 322 10,502 65 162 4,400 323 9,306 65 143 4,400 324 10,263 65 122 4,400 325 10,020 65 122 4,400 326 9,385 65 145 4,400 327 10,984 65 164 4,400 328 1 10,228 65 150 4,400 329 8,474 65 126 4,400 330 8,474 65 126 4,400 331 8,776 65 125 4,400 332 8,864 65 125 4,400 333 13,586 65 99 4,400 334 14,313 65 142 4,400 335 12,790 65 131 4,400 336 1 12,963 65 132 4,400 337 14,449 65 133 4,400 338 11,360 65 130 4,400 339 11,011 65 124 4,400 340 10,508 65 158 4,400 341 11,458 65 154 4,400 342 13,033 65 138 4,400 343 12,790 65 131 4,400 344 12,940 65 131 4,400 345 12,790 65 131 4,400 346 9,728 65 143 4,400 347 10,036 65 148 4,400 348 10,303 65 124 4,400 349 8,933 65 130 4,400 350 9,242 65 130 4,400 351 9,242 65 130 4,400 352 9,242 65 130 4,400 353 9,236 65 130 4,400 354 8,450 65 130 4,400 355 8,450 65 130 4,400 356 8,450 65 130 4,400 357 8,450 65 130 4,400 358 8,450 65 130 4,400 359 8,801 65 130 4,400 360 15,319 65 130 4,400 361 11,772 65 140 4,400 362 9,453 65 145 4,400 363 9,780 65 145 4,400 364 8,497 65 131 4,400 365 8,450 65 130 4,400 366 8,450 65 130 4,400 367 8,450 65 130 4,400 368 8,450 65 130 4,400 369 8,450 65 130 4,400 370 1 8,749 65 130 4,400 371 1 9,189 65 133 4,400 372 9,390 65 133 4,400 373 9,313 65 132 4,400 374 8,922 65 116 4,400 375 12,754 65 97 4,400 376 8,474 65 130 4,400 377 8,450 65 130 4,400 378 8,450 65 130 4,400 379 8,450 65 130 4,400 380 8,450 65 130 4,400 381 8,450 65 130 4,400 382 10,504 65 141 4,400 383 11,092 65 141 4,400 384 8,819 65 130 4,400 385 8,450 65 130 4,400 386 8,729 65 131 4,400 387 12,658 65 127 4,400 388 10,192 65 128 4,400 389 9,559 65 131 4,400 390 9,104 65 140 4,400 391 9,702 65 141 4,400 392 14,151 65 136 4,400 393 9,676 65 139 4,400 394 8,779 65 136 4,400 395 8,570 65 133 4,400 396 9,103 65 139 4,400 397 9,344 65 143 4,400 398 9,170 65 140 4,400 399 10,929 65 133 4,400 400 12,265 65 142 4,400 401 9,984 65 138 4,400 402 10,465 65 144 4,400 403 11,434 65 165 4,400 404 12,108 65 174 4,400 405 12,591 65 1 192 4,400 406 12,589 65 181 4,400 407 12,101 65 174 4,400 408 10,764 65 150 4,400 409 9,554 65 133 4,400 410 11,046 65 135 4,400 411 12,618 65 173 4,400 412 14,656 65 237 4,400 413 14,357 65 1 250 4,400 414 14,285 65 2334,400 415 13,661 65 210 4,400 416 12,931 65 167 4,400 55 ft Lots Lot Lot Area (SF) Lot Width (Feet) Lot Depth (Feet) Impervious Area (SF) 201 11,262 55 115 3,400 202 8,851 55 148 3,400 203 8,645 55 146 3,400 204 8,659 55 146 3,400 205 8,894 55 149 3,400 206 9,079 55 156 3,400 207 9,043 55 165 3,400 208 8,470 55 132 3,400 209 13,623 55 115 3,400 210 10,635 55 137 3,400 211 11,580 55 139 3,400 212 10,688 55 132 3,600 213 13,820 55 124 3,600 214 9,059 55 164 3,400 215 7,285 55 132 3,400 216 7,285 55 132 3,400 217 7,488 55 133 3,400 218 9,065 55 131 3,400 219 8,605 55 124 3,400 220 6,824 55 122 3,400 221 7,222 55 140 3,400 222 8,456 55 168 3,400 223 11,920 55 176 3,400 224 10,548 55 128 3,400 225 7,164 55 131 3,400 226 9,284 55 127 3,600 227 8,832 55 126 3,600 228 6,875 55 125 3,400 229 6,875 55 125 3,400 230 6,875 55 125 3,400 231 6,875 55 125 3,400 232 6,875 55 1IL 3,400 233 7,651 55 126 3,400 234 10,745 55 142 3,400 OALPIN PROPERTY OnmPtraNra TSYI r Wetland Buffer Setback 20 ft. • 25 R xith Sidewalk 90 ft Lots Lot Lot Lot Area (SF) Lot Width Lot Depth (Fret) (Feel) Impeniou rta s.SFa 90 R Lots PUD 15,000 90 167 5.500 75 ft Lots PUD 11,000 75 147 4,400 65 fl Lots PUD 8,450 65 130 4,400 55 R Lon PCD 6,875 55 125 3,400 21,184 Front Setback Rear Setback Side Yard Setback Comer Setback CR 117 Setback 90 R Lon 20 ft 25fl 7.S fl 20 fl SO R 75 R Lots 20 fl 25fl 7.5 ft 20 ft 50 ft 65 ft Lots 1 25 IN 1 25 IN 75 ft 20 ft 50 fl 55 fl Lon 1 25 ft 1 25 R 7S R 1 20 fl 50 fl Wetland Buffer Setback 20 ft. • 25 R xith Sidewalk 90 ft Lots Lot Lot Ana (SF) Lot Width Lot Depth (Feet) (Feet) Impenlou s Area SF 501 17,122 90 190 5.500 502 18,322 90 172 5,500 503 15,066 90 166 5,500 504 22,778 90 252 5,500 505 23,376 90 243 5,500 506 16,704 90 189 5,500 507 21,184 90 216 5,500 508 21,715 90 135 5,500 509 24,394 90 160 5,500 510 10,655 90 150 5,500 511 18,183 90 170 5,500 512 18,275 90 171 5,500 513 15.030 90 167 5,500 514 15,030 90 167 5,500 515 a 15,032 90 167 5500 516 15,574 90 175 5,500 517 15,514 90 175 5,500 518 15,482 90 174 5,500 519 15,576 90 174 5,500 520 15,300 90 170 5,500 521 15,300 90 170 5,500 522 15.300 90 170 5,500 523 15,440 90 172 5,500 524 15,787 90 168 5,500 525 17,021 90 157 5,500 526 22,527 90 167 5,500 527 29,846 90 186 5,500 528 1021 90 184 5,500 529 15,469 90 172 5,500 530 46,679 90 141 5,500 531 47,788 90 140 5,500 Lot Lot Are (SF) Lot Width Lot Depth Impervious (Feet) (Feel s SF a 101 18,389 75 151 4400 102 11,184 75 148 4,400 103 11.081 75 148 4,400 104 11,081 75 148 4,400 105 11,081 75 148 4,400 106 11,081 75 148 4,400 107 11,081 75 148 4.400 108 11,081 75 148 4,400 109 11,081 75 148 4,400 110 11,081 75 148 e� fi 1 �m Lot Lust Are _4.00.4 .X(SF) (Feel if Lot Width Lot Ifl 301 9,993 65 125 LC % 36.67% 40.00% 52.07% 49.45% 1.C% 32.12% 30.02% 36.51% 24.15% 23.53% 32.93% 25.96% 25.33% 22.55% 26.63% 30.25% 30.10% 36.59% 36.59% 36.59% 35.32% 35.45% 35.53% 35.31% 35.95% 35.95% 35.95% 35.62% 34.84% 32.31% 24.42% 18.43% 29.54% 35.55% Total LC 11.78% Total Area 11.51% Total % To 25% 23.93% 39.34% 39.71% 39.71% 39.71% 39.71% 39.71% 39.71% Total LC 39.71% Total Area 39.71% Total % To 35% 44.03% 170,500 620,090 27.50% 682,000 Min Outlot 44,000 118,221 37.22% 125,714 Min Outlot 61,910 7,493 302 8,450 1 65 125 4,400 303 8,450 65 125 4,400 304 8,450 65 125 4,400 305 8.450 65 125 4,400 306 8,450 65 125 4.400 307 11,132 65 125 4,410 306 11,244 65 152 4,400 309 10.672 65 166 4.400 310 12,460 65 193 4.400 311 15,421 65 240 4.400 312 11,215 65 133 4,400 313 10,404 65 160 4,400 314 11,607 65 170 4,400 315 10,622 65 158 4,400 316 11,545 65 136 4,400 317 14,532 65 129 4.400 318 12,761 65 135 4,400 319 13,019 65 131 4,400 320 10.858 65 142 4,400 321 10,887 65 168 4.400 322 10,502 65 162 4,400 323 9.306 65 143 4.400 324 10,263 65 122 4,400 325 10,020 65 122 4,400 326 9.385 65 145 4,400 327 10,984 65 164 4.400 328 10,228 65 150 4400 329 8,474 65 126 4.400 330 8,474 65 126 4,400 331 8,776 65 125 4,400 332 8.864 65 125 4.400 333 13,586 65 99 4.400 334 14,313 654.400 4.400 335 12.790 65 131 4,400 336 12,963 65 1 132 4,400 337 14.449 65 133 4,400 336 11,360 65 130 4,400 339 11,011 65 124 4.400 340 10,508 65 158 4.400 341 11,458 65 154 4,400 342 13,033 65 138 4,400 343 12,790 65 131 4.400 344 12,940 65 131 4,400 345 12,790 65 131 4,400 346 9,728 65 143 4.400 347 10,036 65 148 4,400 348 10,303 65 124 4,400 349 8,933 65 130 4,400 350 9,242 65 130 4,400 351 9,242 65 130 4,400 352 9.242 65 130 4,400 353 9.236 65 130 4,400 354 8,450 65 130 4,400 355 8,450 65 130 4.400 356 8,450 65 130 4,400 357 8,450 65 730 4,400 358 8,450 65 130 4,400 359 8,801 65 130 4,400 360 15,319 65 130 4,400 361 11,772 65 140 4,400 362 9,453 65 145 4,400 363 9,780 65 145 4,400 364 8,497 65 131 4.400 365 8,450 65 130 4,400 366 8,450 65 130 4,400 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 52A7% 39.53% 39.13% 41.23% 35.31% 28.53% 39.23% 42.29% 37.91% 41.42% 38.11% 30.28% 34.48% 33.80% 40.52% 40.42% 41.90% 47.28% 42.87% 43.91% 46.88% 40.06% 43.02% 51.92% 51.92% 50.14% 49.64% 32.39% 30.74% 34.40% 33.94% 30.45% 38.73% 39.96% 41.87% 38.40% 33.76% 34.40% 34.00% 34.40% 45.23% 43.84% 42.71% 49.26% 47.61% 47.61% 47.61% 47.64% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 49.99% 28.72% 3738% 46.55% 44.99% 51.78% 52.07% 52.07% 367 8,450 1 65 130 1 4,400 368 8,450 65 130 4,400 369 8,450 65 130 4,400 370 8,749 65 130 371 9,189 65 133 372 9,390 65 133 373 9,313 65 132 J4,400 374 8,922 65 116 4,400 375 12,754 65 97 4,400 376 8,474 65 130377 4.400 399 8,450 65 130 , 378 8,450 65 130 4,400 379 8,450 65 130 4,400 380 8,450 65 130 4,400 381 8,450 65 130 4,400 382 10504 65 141 4,400 383 11,092 65 141 4,400 384 8,819 65 130 4,400 385 8.450 65 130 4,400 386 8,729 65 131 4,400 387 12,658 65 127 4,400 388 10,192 65 128 4,400 389 9,559 65 131 4,400 390 9,104 65 140 4,400 391 9,702 65 141 4,400 392 14,151 65 136 4.400 393 9,676 65 139 4,400 394 8,779 65 136 4.400 395 8,570 65 133 4,400 396 9,103 65 139 4,400 397 9,344 65 143 4,400 398 9,170 65 140 4.400 399 10,929 65 133 4,400 400 12,265 65 142 4,400 401 9,984 65 138 4,400 402 10,465 65 144 4,400 403 11,434 65 165 4,400 404 12,108 65 174 4,400 405 12,591 65 192 4,400 406 12.589 65 181 4,400 407 12,101 65 174 4,400 408 10,764 65 150 4,400 409 9,554 65 133 4,400 410 11,046 65 135 4,400 411 12,618 65 173 4,400 412 14,656 65 237 4,400 413 14,357 65 250 4,400 414 14,285 65 233 4,400 415 13,661 65 210 4,400 416 12,931 65 167 4,400 55 0 oi. Lot l.ot Am (SF) Lot Width Lot UNWh loped (Feet) (F[et) SF 201 11,262 55 115 3,400 202 8,851 55 148 3,400 203 8,645 55 146 3,400 204 8,659 55 146 3,400 205 8,894 55 149 3,400 206 9,079 55 156 3,400 207 9.043 55 165 3,400 208 8,470 55 132 3,400 2090,623 55 115 3,400 210 10,635 55 137 3,400 211 11,580 55 139 3,400 212 10,688 55 132 3,600 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 50.29% 47.88% 46.86% 47.25% 49.32% 34.50% 51.92% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 52.07% 41.89% 39.67% 49.89% 52.07% 50.41% 34.76% 43.17% 46.03% 48.33% 45.35% 31.09% 45.47% 50.12% 51.34% 48.34% 47.09% 47.98% 40.26% 35.87% 44.07% 42.04% 38.48% 36.34% 34.95% 34.95% 36.36% 40.88% 46.05% 39.83% 34.87% 30.02% 30.65% 30.80% Total LC 32.21% Total Area 34.03% Total % To 35% 30.19% 38.41% 39.33% 39.27% 38.23% 37.45% 37.60% 40.14% 24.96% 31.97% 29.36% 33.68% 510,400 1,218,954 42% 1,458,286 Min Ou0ot 239,332 213 13,820 55 124 3,600 214 9,059 55 164 3,400 215 7.285 55 132 3,400 216 7.285 55 132 3,400 217 7,488 55 133 3,400 218 9,065 55 131 3,400 219 8,605 55 124 3,400 220 6,824 55 122 3,400 221 7,222 55 140 3,400 222 8,456 55 168 3,400 223 11,920 55 176 3,400 224 10,548 55 128 3.400 225 7,164 55 131 3,400 226 9,284 55 127 3,600 327 8,832 55 126 300 228 6,875 55 125 3,400 229 6,875 55 125 3,400 230 6,875 55 125 3,400 231 6,675 55 725 3,400 232 6,875 55 125 3.400 2337,651 55 126 3.400 234 10,745 55 142 3,400 34 26.05% 37.53% 46.67% 46.67% 45.41% 37.51% 39.51% 49.82% 47.08% 40.21% 28.52% 32.23% 47.46% 38.78% 40.76% 49.45% 49.45% 49.45% 49.45% 49.45% Total LC 44.44% Total Area 31.64% Total % To 35% Grand total LC Grand Total Area Grand Total% Needed Total Outlot 116,400 305,057 38.16% 332,571 Min Outlot 5q. ft. Acres 841,300 19.31 2,262,322 51.94 37.19% 37.19% 336,249 7.72 27,514 r(Ti 1� 6 L] ail IS p 21 SJ3It I r4u Ly s P Pis STjlE + r � s • rs yl ` � LJ_J r• a 0 b ' ' j�' p^F ; � � � d; aya§••••aa 9pa�•��il d �`'a9 / ' V, i_'_ r • r 3i Baas 191 a i i I y l +m o f '� y N � e� P`.• 7a �_�a__� Y •f � �� 1i ^,sou # a ) •) • .�.\� ° .ems ° I � - \Oc�.J I'u � ,ids \� �♦c - ei� Ir�a� �.La o f '� y N � e� P`.• 7a �_�a__� Y •f � �� 1i ^,sou # a ) •) • .�.\� ° .ems ° MER�N� 1 W ?I 1 I � MER�N� 1 W ?I 1 t I I _ I � 1 ma/1� 1 I I 1 i xw I 6 r TOPAZ DR. /g g Ig W not e s / / I I `I OUMOT A / I / 9' C S/ R 359 358 35] 356 54 }SJ 352 36O 355 351 3a5 \\d% 350 344_- / 346 OUT -OT A " P / 387 366 410 409 408 362 }� 369 40] \ 342 "\ _ i$q /}/ — Zil" 406 340341 (_ \ —/ Ma 391 412 405 13 ADA 337 J OUT, C 382 393 414 403 \ 415 336 395 416 / / J64 J9fi 101 - 335 365 3>9 397 400 333 334 \ 396 379 \ 6] 377 398 332 376 39s 331 375 330 C 3>0 328 129 WILOT / 371 326 32] / 5 3>2 373 J]a R4 323 32232I 320 J 0 100 200 400 /319 GRAPHIC SCALE IN PEER 312 313- s ( / 315 316 JO i m 1 301 302 ]0.} 2504 }OS 306 `•. 3111 "\ _acs I I ]OB 310 .I WIlOT A i — LAME LUCT; ------------- sccncn m I 90' LOTS TV, \ 116. -75' LOiS i \\ LOCA➢IN1. rMAP - 55' LOTS \ \ \ \ I \ 1 \ I \ I \ I \ \ 1 PIONEERene>eeti> 4 UMv.li91Y 5 E T.cnc .4J, e�4••• •,a,.a,,,,R .,.o...E.w, ,.155116x,-Iolan�.,�;nm.��n„w..>, P.I�+m 6LENNAR GALPIN SITE T!1^L oe wwi, rv. Nm..�4?^wmlrLa 1 M.w.�u Ha,xx6,.5m s=1JD F1s: 4x1-9axe w.am ., ^� "• ^-^ LOT SIZE SKETCH 1n"s AkTAVENORnl v� plommng m� mbu�L.:Jib: 5uem Mr+m. ws nu y LLe I PLYMOLTrH. MV ESOTA 45A46 CHANHASSEM. MN'NFSOTA ©:51x A.nr� krgim�me. Y. n.