Loading...
CAS-15_NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER EXPANSION - 1430 PARK COURT (2)The contents of this file have been scanned. Do not add anything to it unless it has been scanned. • • / -f'G- lu Minnesota Department of Human Services September 1, 2015 Zoning Administrator City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317-0147 Re: Zoning Notification of Application for Department of Human Services Program License License Number: 1079093 This is to inform you that the Department of Human Services, Division of Licensing has an application for a program to be licensed under Minnesota Rules, parts 9503.0005 to 9503.0170 from Next Steps Learning Center, 1430 Park Ct, Chanhassen, MN 55317 to provide day care for 125 children. . Issuance of this license is subject to compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 245A. If you do not contact the Division of Licensing within 30 days of receipt of this letter, we will consider this facility to be in compliance with your local zoning code. If you have questions regarding the facility or its location, please contact Ashley Kerber at 641-590-3131. If you have any questions regarding this letter, contact Anne Blank at 651431-6528 or fax information to (651) 431-7673. Sincerely, qH kyr� Meg Holmen, Unit Manager Licensing Division Office of Inspector General (651)131-6534 slp RECEIVED SEP 0 4 2015 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PO Box 64141 'Saint Paul, Minnesota • 55164-0242 ' An Equal Opportunity Employer SCANNED http: //www. dhs. state. mn. usl7tceming SD �fqtus Report Tuesday, June 30, 2015 Plan Jul Jul 2000 Au st2000 Se te � 2000 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M TMW T F S 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 8..7.. 8 9 10 11 12 3...4 5 6 7 ii­�'Vi�­Y2'i�­WY& W14 15 IE3 V 1819 ib ii i5'18 2021* L Z-24- 17189820212223 0'Y'g Wji H 29 'k ...................... ............................. ....... ................ I.... Securities Due S P Category Description 6/30/2015 6/30/2015 9 Escrows 0 Cash Escrow Next Steps Learning, Center Site Plan Agreement 2014-15 $8.664 (originally $38,104) Landscaping ($1,550) Grading (SO - Released) Erosion Control (S5.200), etc. Paid 6/12/14 Check 1215 from Next Steps Learning Center, Inc. - Receipt #00253088 Notify Sharoneen AI-Jaff 12/24/14 - Per Terty, Jeffery, ok to release grading amount of S29,440. Notified Finance to issue check and hold for pickup on 12/31/14. Kim 9/15/15 - Shammeen, status? Kim 10/1/15 - Sharmeen forwarded mails to Jill for review and respond to me. Kim 11/17/15 - Per Shairmeen, ok to release and copy Jill. Kim 11/20/15 -Notified Finance Dept. to release escrow balance of 58.664. Activity closed, Kim ...................................................................................... ............................... ............................................. ...................................................... ............. ........... Cp 1111p2p1591iwm S=St*uP-pmM SCANNED PWI CITY OF CHANHASSEN • • POO BOX 147 i CHANHASSEN MN 55317 06/03/2014 2:47 PM Receipt No. 00253088 CLERK: bethanya PAYEE: NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER 1430 PARK COURT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Site Plan Agreement 2014-15 Landscaping, Grading, Erosion ------------------------------------------------------- Security Escrow 38,104.00 Total Cash Check 1215 Change 38,104.00 0.00 38,104.00 0.00 1 l / a o 15 0 IL -o t --e- l-&� bc, to n Ce 00 SCANNED CITY+ OF CHANHASSEN • • n( O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 06/03/2014 2:47 PM Receipt No. 00253088 CLERK: bethanya PAYEE: NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER 1430 PARK COURT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Site Plan Agreement 2014-15 Landscaping, Grading, Erosion ------------------------------------------------------- Security Escrow 38,104.00 Total Cash Check 1215 Change 38,104.00 0.00 38,104.00 0.00 SCANNED 14-- i =, a • _ Minnesota Department of Human Services September 29, 2014 Zoning Administrator City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317-0147 Re: Zoning notification for increased license capacity for Department of Human Services program license License Number: 1062747 This is to notify you that the Department of Human Services, Division of Licensing, has received a request to increase the license capacity of Next Steps Learning Center, from 94 to 100 children. Next Steps Learning Center is a child care center licensed under Minnesota Rules, part 9503.0005 to 9503.0170. The child care center is located at 1430 Park Court, Chanhassen, MN 55317. Issuance of this license is subject to compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 245A. If you do not contact the Division of Licensing within 30 days of receipt of this letter, we will consider this facility to be in compliance with your local zoning code. If you have questions regarding the facility or its location, please contact Nicole Spaude at 952-368-4409. If you have any questions regarding this letter, contact Anne Blank at 651-431-6528 or fax information to 651-431-7673. Sincerely, Meg Holmen, Unit Supervisor Licensing Division Office of Inspector General PO Box 64141 • Saint Paul, Minnesota . 55164-0141 • An Equal Opportunity Employer SCANNED http: //www. dhs. state. mm us/1 iceming Thomas J. Campbell Roger N. Knutson Thomas M. Scott Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehler Soren M. Mattick John F. Kelly Henry A. Schaeffer, III Alina Schwartz Shana N. Conklin David H. Schultz 1380 Corporate Center Curve Suite 317 • Eagan, MN 55121 651-452-5000 Fax 651-452-5550 www.ck-law.com 0 0 CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association CITY OFCHANHASSEN RECEIVED September 19, 2014 SEP 2 3 2014 CHANHAMPlAW fiDEPS' Ms. Kim Meuwissen City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Chanhassen — Miscellaneous Recording Dear Kim: Enclosed herewith for your file is the original, recorded Site Plan Agreement 2014-15 between the City and Spaude Holdings LLC. Please note that this Site Plan Agreement was recorded with the Registrar of Titles on July 28, 2014, as Document No. T192797. If you have any questions regarding the above, please give me a call. cjh Enclosure 175692vl Very truly yours, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association WjjMF 10 +,,'� Legal Assistant SCANNED I • Document No.• OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES T 192797 CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Receipt # Certified Recorded on July 28, 2014 1:10 PM 192797 Cert # 36040 Fee: $46.00 IIIIIIIIIIII III I III RMark egistrar of Titles CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN AGREEMENT 2014-15 SPECIAL PRO ;VISIONS THIS AGREEMENT ("Site Plan Agreement") dated May 27, 2014, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC, a Limited Liability Company under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion (Next Steps Learning Center), Planning Case 2014-15 (referred to in this Site Plan Agreement as the "Project"). The land is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enters into this Site Plan Agreement and furnishes the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terns shall control. The plans are: Plan A: (1 of 1) Pre Development Drainage Areas dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. Plan B: (1 of 1) Post Development Drainage Areas dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. Plan C: Existing Conditions Exterior Elevations dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Premier Land Surveying Inc. PlanD: (Al) Site Plan dated Received dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Haugen Architecture, Inc. PlanE: (Al) Site Plan dated Received dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Haugen Architecture, Inc. SP -1 SCANNED PlanF: (A2) Floor dated Received dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Haugen Architecture, Inc. Plan G: (A3) Exterior Elevations dated Received dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Haugen Architecture, Inc. PlanH: (1 of 3) Parking Lot and Grading Plans dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. PlanI: (2 of 3) Details Plans dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. Plan J: (3 of 3) Tree Preservation dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. PlanK: Lighting Plan dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by RAB Lighting. PlanL: Lighting Plan dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by RAB Lighting. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by July 31, 2015. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Site Plan Agreement, the Developer shall famish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") in the amount of $38,104.00. This amount has been calculated at a rate of 110% of the actual value of improvement (landscaping ($1,550, grading $29,440, erosion control $5,200, etc.). The City will release the security posted in accordance with the City Code. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Spaude Holdings, LLC 1430 Park Court Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. Jeremy Spaude Phone: 612-501-1493 Jeremy-nslc@vahoo.com Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. SP -2 7. Other Special Conditions. On May 27, 2014, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motion: "The City Council approves the site plan for the construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare addition as shown in plans dated received April 18, 2014, subject to the following conditions of approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Environmental Resources Conditions 1. The applicant shall install a total of three trees around and/or within the parking lot. Engineering Conditions 1. The applicant and their engineer shall explore alternate EOF to reduce pooling depth and area. 2. A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required. 3. The scale on the grading plans must be corrected. 4. The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the comers of the proposed structure. 5. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas. 6. The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1. 7. Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and aid in the stormwater management of the property per City Code §20-1118. 8. The erosion prevention and sediment control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of Chanhassen City Code. 9. The applicant must procure and comply with all required approvals from applicable jurisdictional agencies. 10. The rip rap slope must be shown on the plans and erosion prevention and sediment control practices shall be modified to accommodate this disturbance. Building Official Conditions 1. The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. All plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Detailed occupancy and building area -related code requirements cannot be reviewed until further information is provided. SP -3 4. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Planning Conditions 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 2. Any new signs must comply with the sign ordinance requirements. 3. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. Light fixtures shall be downcast and the light shall be cut off at a 90 -degree angle as required by the city code. All fixtures shall be shielded." 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Site Plan Agreement are attached as Exhibit 'B" and incorporated herein. CITY OF CHANHASSEN I WA (SEAL) /M STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this/a�daybo�fsen, 2014, by Tom Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. KAREN J.ENGELHARDT lip Notary Public -Minnesota M Cgmml4fOn Ezzpplres Jan 31,2016 �egwwx�coawury SP -4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF CA2V>✓2 ) 0 DEVELOPER: SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC BY: Jtiefii�lpaude,3ia-naging Partner The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ? u&' day of(Y)�, 2014, by Jeremy Spaude, the Managing Partner of Spaude Holdings LLC, a Limited Liability Corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the company. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 SP -5 NOTAR UBLIC KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public-Mirmesou ' My CommieeiOn E.Ol Jen 31, 2016 0 0 CONSENT Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this day of :JUr C 2014 SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC By 3 remy Spaude, Managing Partner STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF 0—L _ ) The foregoing instrument j,wa,s acknowledged before me this � day of�i1G 2014, by 5,ey-tfrA.J t- Y LIC �i the t kayxap j na Rkf k e r of Spaude Holdings LLt, alfinited Liability Corporation under the haws of the State of Minnesota. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 SP -(A QUA L&LA46*\— O PUBLI '. KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Pub110-M1rw*sota My Commieapi FxpYst.W 91, 7D76 0 0 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO SITE PLAN AGREEMENT LIS Argo P60 which holds a mortgage on the su ject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Agreement, agrees that the Site Plan Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this 2 day of J Vl ✓1 L , 2014. WELLS FARM Bj� K, vilvl l`o Il Molly Jeatran Ayr STATE OF MINNESOTA ss COUNTY OF �lE I ) I The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Z day ofy �Ne-- 2014,by )Vl1iljU �G �, Assistant Vice President of. Wells Fargo B nk, N.A., on�i-t-s, behalf. JESSICA R KELLY NOTARY PUBLIC NOTARY PUBUC-MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 0113112015 DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-11 SP -17 0 0 EXHIBIT A TO SITE PLAN AGREEMENT 2014-15 Lot 2, Block 1, ROME PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof, excepting therefrom the following: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, ROME PARK, shown as Parcel 220B on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 10-10, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. (Certificate of Title No. 36040.0) 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN AGREEMENT EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) Site Plan Agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, 3) the Site Plan Agreement has been recorded with the County Recorder's and Registrar of Titles' Offices of the County where the project is located, and 4) the City Planner has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan H, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowing materials, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be wan -anted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be wan -anted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The City shall retain $3,180.00 of the posted security for landscaping for twelve (12) months following planting to secure the warranties. Provided the landscaping is in the condition required herein following such twelve (12) GC -1 0 month period, the City shall release the remaining security to Developer within ten (10) business days of request therefore. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses, which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is fust given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Site Plan Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Pernit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Site Plan Agreement. GC -2 F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Site Plan Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Site Plan Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recordin¢. This Site Plan Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this Site Plan Agreement shall be from 7:00 am. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the property pursuant to this Site Plan Agreement, the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities to the extent any of the same have jurisdiction over the property's development: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. GC -3 0 M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Site Plan Agreement. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. GC4 Thomas J. Campbell Roger N. Knutson Thomas M. Scott Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehler Soren M. Mattick John F. Kelly Henry A. Schaeffer, III Alina Schwartz Shana N. Conklin David H. Schultz 1380 Corporate Center Curve Suite 317 • Eagan, MN 55121 651-452-5000 Fax 651-451-5550 www.ck-law.com r 0 CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Ms. Kim Meuwissen City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 July 10, 2014 �'17Y ORECENEDH�� JUL 14 2014 CHAWASWNPIIMIWM" 1114114— fid n .tamed SPA Re: Chanhassen —Miscellaneous Recording '74o+ ��e & /tACc4oLe.r�oy Dear Kim: U � (/ Enclosed herewith and returned to you unrecorded is the Site Plan Agreement 2014-15. The Site Plan Agreement was returned to me by the Registrar of Titles because Karen Engelhardt did not stamp her notary seal next to her signature on the City's acknowledgment (page SP -4). Please have Karen affix her notary seal stamp next to her signature and return the Site Plan Agreement to me for recording. If you have any questions regarding the above, please give me a call. Very truly yours, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association By: _, r *b� Carole J. Hoeft cjh Legal Assistant Enclosure 175692vl SCANNED CITY OF CHANASEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FAX (952) 227-1110 TO: Campbell Knutson, PA 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter LETTER OARANSMITTAL DATE JOB NO. 6/10/14 2014-15 ATTENTION Carole Hoeft RE: Document Recording ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Request ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 5/27/14 14-15 Site Plan Agreement for Next Steps Learning Center ❑ FORBIDS DUE THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ® For Recording ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO: Jeremy Spaude, Spaude Holdings, LLC Bob Generous, Senior Planner SIGNE Kim Meuwisser (952) 227-1107 SCANNED If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN AGREEMENT 2014-15 SPECIAL PROVISIONS THIS AGREEMENT ("Site Plan Agreement") dated May 27, 2014, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC, a Limited Liability Company under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the 'Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion (Next Steps Learning Center), Planning Case 2014-15 (referred to in this Site Plan Agreement as the "Project"). The land is legally described as Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enters into this Site Plan Agreement and furnishes the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: PlanA: (1 of 1) Pre Development Drainage Areas dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. Plan B: (1 of 1) Post Development Drainage Areas dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. Plan C: Existing Conditions Exterior Elevations dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Premier Land Surveying Inc. PlanD: (Al) Site Plan dated Received dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Haugen Architecture, hic. PlanE: (Al) Site Plan dated Received dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Haugen Architecture, Inc. SP -1 PlanF: (A2) Floor dated Received dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Haugen Architecture, hic. Plan G: (A3) Exterior Elevations dated Received dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Haugen Architecture, Inc. PlanH: (1 of 3) Parking Lot and Grading Plans dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. Plan 1: (2 of 3) Details Plans dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. PlanJ: (3 of 3) Tree Preservation dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. Plan K: Lighting Plan dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by RAB Lighting. PlanL: Lighting Plan dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by RAB Lighting. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by July 31, 2015. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Site Plan Agreement, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") in the amount of $38,104.00. This amount has been calculated at a rate of 110% of the actual value of improvement (landscaping ($1,550, grading $29,440, erosion control $5,200, etc.). The City will release the security posted in accordance with the City Code. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Spaude Holdings, LLC 1430 Park Court Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. Jeremy Spaude Phone: 612-501-1493 Jeremy-nslc(&yahoo.com Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone(952)227-1100. SP -2 If 0 0 7. Other Special Conditions. On May 27, 2014, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motion: "The City Council approves the site plan for the construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare addition as shown in plans dated received April 18, 2014, subject to the following conditions of approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Environmental Resources Conditions 1. The applicant shall install a total of three trees around and/or within the parking lot. En ineerina Conditions 1. The applicant and their engineer shall explore alternate EOF to reduce pooling depth and area. 2. A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required. 3. The scale on the grading plans must be corrected. 4. The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the comers of the proposed structure. 5. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas. 6. The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1. Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and aid in the stormwater management of the property per City Code §20-1118. 8. The erosion prevention and sediment control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of Chanhassen City Code. 9. The applicant must procure and comply with all required approvals from applicable jurisdictional agencies. 10. The rip rap slope must be shown on the plans and erosion prevention and sediment control practices shall be modified to accommodate this disturbance. Building Official Conditions 1. The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. All plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Detailed occupancy and building area -related code requirements cannot be reviewed until further information is provided. SP -3 1I u T • 4. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Planning Conditions 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 2. Any new signs must comply with the sign ordinance requirements. 3. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. Light fixtures shall be downcast and the light shall be cut off at a 90 -degree angle as required by the city code. All fixtures shall be shielded." 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Site Plan Agreement are attached as Exhibit 'B" and incorporated herein. CITY OF CHANHASSEN Th � Furlyng Mayor (SEAL) F I n AND: Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this�a�dayo f Chanhas2014, by Tom Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the osen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. SP -4 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF CA2v�2 ) 0 DEVELOPER: SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC BY:< 7YL paude, Managing Partner The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 3U&day ofmom., 2014, by Jeremy Spaude, the Managing Partner of Spaude Holdings LLC, a Limited Liability Corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the company. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 SP -5 NOTAR `P ELIC KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public -Minnesota •aa My Com Wft E*Iroe Jen 31, 3015 0 CONSENT 0 Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this& day of , 2014 SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC By STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF eaiw _ ) The foregoing instrument tw�as acknowledged before me this �J day of YAG 2014, by Tet'=M4 �}}Y.tt1GFt!i the 1Ua,,vwn;.nc Reiner of Spaude Holdings LLt, a United Liability Corporation under �the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 SP -8 JfMAO," KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary K b io-W15 Y Canmiupn E . Jn 81, 2016 0 0 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO SITE PLAN AGREEMENT lis -tw which holds a mortgage on the sttject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Agreement, agrees that the Site Plan Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this 2 day of J to ✓1 L , 2014. Ayr STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss COUNTY OF ne j ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Z day of k hy 2014, by I JESSICA R KELLY NOTARY PUBLIC NOTARY PUBLIC • MINNESOTA W COMMISSION UPIRES 0113112015 DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-11 SP -9 T CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN AGREEMENT EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) Site Plan Agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, 3) the Site Plan Agreement has been recorded with the County Recorder's and Registrar of Titles' Offices of the County where the project is located, and 4) the City Planner has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan H, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowing materials, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be wan -anted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The City shall retain $3,180.00 of the posted security for landscaping for twelve (12) months following planting to secure the warranties. Provided the landscaping is in the condition required herein following such twelve (12) GC -1 0 0 month period, the City shall release the remaining security to Developer within ten (10) business days of request therefore. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses, which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Site Plan Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severabilitv. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Site Plan Agreement. GC -2 F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Site Plan Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Site Plan Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording. This Site Plan Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this Site Plan Agreement shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alterative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the property pursuant to this Site Plan Agreement, the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities to the extent any of the same have jurisdiction over the property's development: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. GC -3 0 0 M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall famish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Site Plan Agreement. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. GC -4 CITY OF CHAN9ASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PC Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.2271100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen. mn.us 0 0 May 30, 2014 Mr. Jeremy Spaude Next Steps Learning Center 1430 Park Court Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014-15 Dear Mr. Spaude: This letter is to formally notify you that on May 27, 2014, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motion: "The City Council approves the site plan for the construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare addition as shown in plans dated received April 18, 2014, subject to the following conditions of approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Environmental Resources Conditions 1. The applicant shall install a total of three trees around and/or within the parking lot. Engineering Conditions The applicant and their engineer shall explore alternate EOF to reduce pooling depth and area. 2. A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required. 3. The scale on the grading plans must be corrected. 4. The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the corners of the proposed structure. 5. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas. 6. The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1. 7. Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and aid in the stormwater management of the property per City Code §20- 1118. The erosion prevention and sediment control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of Chanhassen City Code. Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED Mr. Jeremy Spaude • • May 30, 2014 Page 2 9. The applicant must procure and comply with all required approvals from applicable jurisdictional agencies. 10. The rip rap slope must be shown on the plans and erosion prevention and sediment control practices shall be modified to accommodate this disturbance. Building Official Conditions 1. The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. All plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Detailed occupancy and building area -related code requirements cannot be reviewed until further information is provided. 4. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Planning Conditions 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 2. Any new signs must comply with the sign ordinance requirements. 3. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. Light fixtures shall be downcast and the light shall be cut off at a 90 -degree angle as required by the city code. All fixtures shall be shielded." Enclosed is a Site Plan Agreement for you to sign, notarize and return to our office for recording. If you have any questions, please call me at (952) 227-1134 or e-mail me at saljaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, 4 Sharmeen Senior Planner ec: Todd Hoffinan, Park & Recreation Director Stephanie Bartels, Project Engineer Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Jerry Mohn, Building Official 9.\p1an12014 planning cases\2014-15 next steps learning center a q=sim*Ppmval laterAm 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN AGREEMENT 2014-15 SPECIAL PROVISIONS THIS AGREEMENT ("Site Plan Agreement") dated May 27, 2014, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC, a Limited Liability Company under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion (Next Steps Learning Center), Planning Case 2014-15 (referred to in this Site Plan Agreement as the "Project"). The land is legally described as Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enters into this Site Plan Agreement and furnishes the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: PlanA: (1 of 1) Pre Development Drainage Areas dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. PlanB: (l of 1) Post Development Drainage Areas dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. Plan C: Existing Conditions Exterior Elevations dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Premier Land Surveying Inc. Plan D: (Al) Site Plan dated Received dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Haugen Architecture, Inc. PlanE: (Al) Site Plan dated Received dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Haugen Architecture, Inc. SP -1 P 0 PlanF: (A2) Floor dated Received dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Haugen Architecture, Inc. PlanG: (A3) Exterior Elevations dated Received dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Haugen Architecture, Inc. PlanH: (1 of 3) Parking Lot and Grading Plans dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. Plan I: (2 of 3) Details Plans dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. PlanJ: (3 of 3) Tree Preservation dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by Kallio Engineering. PlanK: Lighting Plan dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by RAB Lighting. Plan L: Lighting Plan dated Received April 18, 2014, prepared by RAB Lighting. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by July 31, 2015. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Site Plan Agreement, the Developer shall famish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") in the amount of $38,104.00. This amount has been calculated at a rate of 110% of the actual value of improvement (landscaping ($1,550, grading $29,440, erosion control $5,200, etc.). The City will release the security posted in accordance with the City Code. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Spaude Holdings, LLC 1430 Park Court Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. Jeremy Spaude Phone: 612-501-1493 Jeremy-nslc(a)yahoo.com Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone(952)227-1100. SP -2 7. Other Special Conditions. On May 27, 2014, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motion: "The City Council approves the site plan for the construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare addition as shown in plans dated received April 18, 2014, subject to the following conditions of approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Environmental Resources Conditions 1. The applicant shall install a total of three trees around and/or within the parking lot. Engineering Conditions 1. The applicant and their engineer shall explore alternate EOF to reduce pooling depth and area. 2. A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required. 3. The scale on the grading plans must be corrected. 4. The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the comers of the proposed structure. 5. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas. 6. The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1. 7. Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and aid in the stormwater management of the property per City Code §20-1118. 8. The erosion prevention and sediment control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of Chanhassen City Code. 9. The applicant must procure and comply with all required approvals from applicable jurisdictional agencies. 10. The rip rap slope must be shown on the plans and erosion prevention and sediment control practices shall be modified to accommodate this disturbance. Building Official Conditions 1. The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. All plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Detailed occupancy and building area -related code requirements cannot be reviewed until fiuther information is provided. SP -3 0 0 4. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Planning Conditions 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 2. Any new signs must comply with the sign ordinance requirements. 3. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. Light fixtures shall be downcast and the light shall be cut off at a 90 -degree angle as required by the city code. All fixtures shall be shielded." 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Site Plan Agreement are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. CITY OF CHANHASSEN "V (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_day of 2014, by Tom Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC SP -4 Jeremy Spaude, Managing Partner STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2014, by Jerry Spaude, the Managing Partner of Spaude Holdings LLC, a Limited Liability Corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the company. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 Dal NOTARY PUBLIC CONSENT Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this_ day of 2014 COM 1)1►Le7.90" STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF 1 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2014, by , the of Spaude Holdings LLC, a Limited Liability Corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 SP -8 NOTARY PUBLIC 0 0 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO SITE PLAN AGREEMENT which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Agreement, agrees that the Site Plan Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this _ day of 12014. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2014, by DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-11 az% NOTARY PUBLIC 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN AGREEMENT EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITIONS I. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) Site Plan Agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, 3) the Site Plan Agreement has been recorded with the County Recorder's and Registrar of Titles' Offices of the County where the project is located, and 4) the City Planner has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan H, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowing materials, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease five at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The City shall retain $3,180.00 of the posted security for landscaping for twelve (12) months following planting to secure the warranties. Provided the landscaping is in the condition required herein following such twelve (12) X61 0 0 month period, the City shall release the remaining security to Developer within ten (10) business days of request therefore. 7. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses, which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is fust given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Site Plan Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Site Plan Agreement. MMA 0 0 F. Occupancv. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Site Plan Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Site Plan Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording. This Site Plan Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. L Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this Site Plan Agreement shall be from 7:00 am. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws. Ordinances, and Regulations. hi the development of the property pursuant to this Site Plan Agreement, the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities to the extent any of the same have jurisdiction over the propertys development: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. 0 0 M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall fiunish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Site Plan Agreement. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer fiuther agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. C®reLI Chanhassen City Council — May 27, 2014 • 7. Next Steps Learning Center: Approval of Site Plan Review for a 3,000 square foot building expansion, 1430 Park Court, Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park; Applicant: Jeremy Spaude. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: None. LAW ENFORCEMENT/FIRE DEPARTMENT UPDATE. Mayor Furlong: Good evening Sergeant. Sgt. Mike Walling: Good evening Mr. Mayor, City Council. I'm Sergeant Walling, the TZD Coordinator for the sheriff s office. Just wanted to let the community know the sheriffs office has been beginning on May 19th, we've been participating in the statewide mobilization with over 400 other law enforcement agencies in the state for the May Click It or Ticket seatbelt mobilization. That enforcement effort runs through June 181, upcoming this Sunday. If you weren't aware Minnesota has a primary seatbelt law that requires all occupants of a vehicle to be buckled up. Front seat passengers. Back seat passengers and then law enforcement can issue a citation to anyone who isn't buckled. Some statistics in the last 5 years on Minnesota roads, that being 2009 through 2013 there were 1,423 motor vehicle occupant deaths out of which 587 were not buckled. In Carver County during this 5 year period 8 of those motorists were unbelted. Some pre -enforcement efforts that we do at the sheriffs office. We do pre -enforcement surveys prior to the enforcement wave at one of those locations. At Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard. Survey indicates that roughly 95% of motorists in Chanhassen are wearing their seatbelt. A post enforcement survey after the enforcement wave last year conducted on June 6, 2013 showed that motorists at this same intersection were at 92% use so efforts to increase seatbelt use are having their effect. The Click It or Ticket seatbelt mobilization and education and seatbelt enforcement education is a component of the State's towards zero death program. Primary vision of the TZD program is to create a safe driving culture in Minnesota in which motorists support a goal of zero road fatalities by practicing and promoting safe driving behavior. Again the message to our citizenry when we make stops for seatbelts is buckle up. We value your life. That's what I have. Do you have any questions? Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Any questions for Sergeant Walling? Councilman Laufenburger. I have one. Mayor Furlong: Councilman Laufenburger. Councilman Laufenburger: Sergeant, you can help educate me and others that are watching at home. There was a time in maybe a few years ago I thought that getting stopped for not having your seatbelt buckled was not the only offense. If you were stopped for some other reason and they caught you with your buckle unbuckled they could ticket you for that. Is that still true today? Or first of all, was that true at one time Sergeant? Sgt. Mike Walling: It was true prior to, I want to believe 2008 or 2010. That you needed, that the seatbelt law wasn't a primary offense. Councilman Laufenburger. So you called it a primary offense which means that you can be stopped if the only thing you're doing wrong is driving without visibly noticeable buckle, is that correct? Sgt. Mike Walling: Correct. Legislation passed within the last few years made the not wearing your seatbelt a primary violation which you can be stopped for and cited. SCANNED Chanhassen City Council —1.27, 2014 • Todd Gerhardt: At least he found Creekwood with all the detours. I think you have two different sets of detour routes. Chief Don Johnson: Ed was very nice even though I didn't have the fie out, he was very easy on me. Mayor Furlong: Any other thoughts or comments? Chief Don Johnson: Yes. This is a great opportunity. The fire service as a whole is a pretty family oriented environment and to see my extended family and my new family, it's been wonderful that the City of Chanhassen is a great city. The fire department's a great fire department. As welcoming as City management has been, as welcoming as my new fun department has been, it's a great time for me to look at a group of professional men and women who are dedicated to the City in just the 2 weeks I've... so we're highly trained. Very dedicated towards professional service and I look very forward to being a part of this family. Mayor Furlong: Welcome. Chief Don Johnson: Thank you. Thank you for this honor. Mayor Furlong: We have some cake. Todd Gerhardt: We have cake. Mayor Furlong: Yep, so we're going to take a quick recess from the council meeting. (The City Council meeting was recessed for a short time to distribute cake.) Mayor Furlong: We'll call the meeting back to order and let's move on with the next items on our agenda. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Ernst moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: 1. Approval of City Council Minutes dated May 12, 2014. 2. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated May 6, 2014. 3. Approve Amendment to City Code Concerning Solicitor and Peddler Licenses. 4. Approval of Resolutions Revoking Conditional Use Permits Issued by the City: a. Resolution #2014-33: #2003-08, 8170 Mallory Court b. Resolution #2014-34: #1997-05, 1905 Stoughton Avenue c. Resolution #2014-35: #1984-20,7300 Galpin Boulevard 5. Deleted. 6. Resolution #2014-36: Approve Resolution Accepting $500 Donation from K1einBank Chanhassen for the Senior Center Life -Long Learning Program. 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.2271110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.22T1 170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner DATE: May 27, 2014 DILI," ' SUBJ: Site Plan Review for a 3,000 square -foot Daycare Addition, Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case #2014-15 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a Site Plan for construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion, subject to the conditions of approval; and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact." City Council approval requires a majority vote of the entire City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting site plan approval for a 3,000 square -foot expansion of a daycare center. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within the required 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on May 20, 2014 to review the proposed request. The Commission voted five to zero on a motion recommending approval of the site plan request. The May 20, 2014 Planning Commission minutes for this item are attached. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of a Site Plan for construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion, subject to the conditions of approval; and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated May 20, 2014. 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated May 20, 2014. g:\plan\2014 planning cases\2014-15 Next Steps 1-eaming Center\Executive Sutmnaty Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve a Site Plan for construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion, subject to the conditions of approval; and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Site Plan Review approval for the construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion (Next Steps Learning Center). Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within the required 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. LOCATION: 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park) APPLICANT: Next Steps Learning Center 1430 Park Court Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. Jeremy Spaude Phone: 612-501-1493 Jeremv nslcC&yahoo.com PRESENT ZONING: IOP, Industrial Office Park 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Office/Industrial ACREAGE: 2.2 Acres 96,010 square feet DENSITY: N/A LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Planning Commission • Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014-15 May 20, 2014 Page 2 PROPOSAUSUMMARY The applicant is requesting a site plan review for the expansion of an existing daycare center. The site is zoned IOP, Industrial Office Park and bordered by Highway 5 to the north, office buildings to the east and southeast and Riley Creek to the west. The lot area of the daycare site is 2.2 acres and gains access off of Park Court. The site plan is for a 3,000 square -foot addition that will be added along the southwest portion of the building. Materials used on the addition will be identical to those used on the original building: Decorative Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) with a strip of smooth accent CMU, and windows. is The existing playground is located along the north portion of the existing building and is not proposed to change. Parking is located along the south and east portions of the lot. The southerly parking area will be reconfigured and new spaces will be added to accommodate the addition. Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan, with conditions outlined in the staff report. BACKGROUND On October 24, 1988, the City Council approved a conditional use permit with a variance to allow the construction of a 6,700 square -foot daycare center with a variance for a parking setback. Planning Commission • Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014-15 May 20, 2014 Page 3 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article 11, Division 6, Site Plan Review GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE The proposed 3,000 square -foot daycare building addition will be situated northwest of the existing building. With this addition, the total building area will be 9,700 square feet. The site is zoned IOP, Industrial Office Park and bordered by Highway 5 to the north, office buildings to the east and southeast and Riley Creek to the west. The lot area of the daycare site is 2.2 acres. The site is within the shoreland district for Riley Creek. The proposed improvements are 70 feet from the centerline of Riley 0 \ Proposed MOW `1 PAU � cougr Creek at its nearest point. This is compliant with the required 50 -foot setback. to Riley Creek acting as a buffer. There is at least 50 feet of wooded land adjacent The addition is fairly straightforward. Access is gained from Park Road. Existing parking is located to the east and south of the site. The parking will be reconfigured to allow for the addition and add two parking spaces. Existing playground area is located along the northeast portion of the building. The applicant is proposing to utilize the same materials as the existing building consisting of decorative Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) with a strip of smooth accent CMU, and windows. The accent band was painted and the applicant will match that color. Windows are also used to add an architectural interest. The addition including the existing building is located 60.6 feet from the north, 63 feet from the east, and 50 feet from the southwest property line. Site coverage may not exceed 70 percent. The total hard surface coverage proposed on the site is 33.49%. Planning Commission • • Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014-15 May 20, 2014 Page 4 ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE The proposed addition will match the existing building. The colors and materials will be identical to the existing building. The fagade of the addition viewed by the public contains 50 percent windows and/or doors. LIGHTING/SIGNAGE The applicant prepared a lighting photometrics plan. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. Light fixtures shall be downcast and the light shall be cut off at a 90 -degree angle as required by the city code. All fixtures shall be shielded. The applicant has not shown any signs on the site plan. There are existing wall and monument signs on the site. Any modification in signage must comply with the sign ordinance and will require a sign permit. The ordinance requires one parking space per six students. The building capacity is 119 students which translates to 20 parking spaces. The applicant is providing 28 parking spaces. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE Size, Portion and Placement Entries: The building has a pronounced entrance. Articulation: The building incorporates adequate detail and has been tastefully designed. The architectural style is unique to the building but will fit in with the surrounding area. The building utilizes exterior materials that are durable and of high quality. Signs: All signage must meet the sign ordinance. Material and Detail High quality materials are being used on the building. Color The colors chosen for the building are earth tones. The selection is unique, but blends in with the surrounding buildings. Planning Commission • • Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014-15 May 20, 2014 Page 5 Height and Roof Design The maximum building height permitted is three stories. The building meets the ordinance requirement. The roofline is staggered, adding articulation to the design of the building. The ordinance requires a pitched element on the building. A pitched element is located above the entrance into the building. All rooftop equipment must be screened from views. Facade Transparency The southeast fagade is the only one that will be modified by this addition and it contains more than 50 percent windows and/or doors. Loading Areas, Refuse Areas. etc. The existing trash enclosure is located northeast of the existing building. No changes are proposed. SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the City shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; �v vim[ 4 �u wve s T ux 4w M� Loading Areas, Refuse Areas. etc. The existing trash enclosure is located northeast of the existing building. No changes are proposed. SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the City shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; Planning Commission • • Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014-15 May 20, 2014 Page 6 (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; C. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and an•angement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the design requirements, the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance, and the site plan review requirements. The site design is compatible with the surrounding development and the existing building. It is functional and harmonious with the approved development for this area. Planning Commission • • Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014-15 May 20, 2014 Page 7 COMPLIANCE TABLE WETLANDS. BLUFFS AND MORELAND Based upon a review of aerial photography, soils data, the National Wetland Inventory maps, the City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Wetland Inventory, there is no evidence of any wetland features on site. Further, while there are steep slopes immediately adjacent to the site, they do not meet the definition of bluff. The site is within the shoreland district for Riley Creek. The proposed improvements are 70 feet from the centerline of Riley Creek at its nearest point. This is compliant with the required 50 - foot setback. There is at least 50 feet of wooded land adjacent to Riley Creek acting as a buffer. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The existing site drains water runoff in two directions. The runoff from the building, half of the west parking lot and the west half of the property all drain over the surface of the ground to Riley Creek. The existing spillway into Riley Creek has experienced erosion and is in a state of deterioration. The water runoff from the east half of the property, including most of the pavement surface, drains to Park Court to be picked up by the municipal storm sewer system. Ordinance Requirements (IOP) Proposed Lot Area 1 acres 2.2 acres Frontage 150 feet 328 feet Depth 200 feet 471 feet Lot Coverage 70% 33.49% Building Height Principal four stories (50 feet) one story (21 feet) Accessory one story NA Building Setbacks Front yard 30 feet Approx. 60 feet Rear yard 10 feet Approx. 65 feet Side yard 10 feet Approx. 170 feet Riley Creek 50 feet 75 feet Parking Requirements Stalls 1/6 space per student --20 ? h WETLANDS. BLUFFS AND MORELAND Based upon a review of aerial photography, soils data, the National Wetland Inventory maps, the City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Wetland Inventory, there is no evidence of any wetland features on site. Further, while there are steep slopes immediately adjacent to the site, they do not meet the definition of bluff. The site is within the shoreland district for Riley Creek. The proposed improvements are 70 feet from the centerline of Riley Creek at its nearest point. This is compliant with the required 50 - foot setback. There is at least 50 feet of wooded land adjacent to Riley Creek acting as a buffer. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The existing site drains water runoff in two directions. The runoff from the building, half of the west parking lot and the west half of the property all drain over the surface of the ground to Riley Creek. The existing spillway into Riley Creek has experienced erosion and is in a state of deterioration. The water runoff from the east half of the property, including most of the pavement surface, drains to Park Court to be picked up by the municipal storm sewer system. Planning Commission • • Next Steps Learning Center — Planning Case 2014-15 May 20, 2014 Page 8 The applicant is proposing to install a dry pond to address the runoff and erosion issues along the slope of Riley Creek. This proposed practice will reduce rates to the steep slope area and will provide some water quality benefit and volume reduction. The outlet for the dry pond will have a rip rap slope constructed to provide energy dissipation. This area should be shown on the overall grading plan and erosion prevention and sediment control practices shall be modified to accommodate this disturbance. The plan calls for the use of a portion of the west parking lot and drop-off area as storage for the larger rain events. Water may pool to a depth of one-half foot. It appears that it may be possible to reduce, although not eliminate, this pooling depth and area by installing a curb cut emergency overflow in the southwest comer of the parking lot. A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required. The scale on the grading plans must be corrected. The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the comers of the proposed structure. The plan shall be revised to show locations of any proposed stockpile areas. The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1. EASEMENTS A 10 -foot drainage and utility easement runs along the north, east and southeast property lines, whereas a 5 -foot drainage and utility easement runs along the rest of the property's borders PARKING LOT Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and aid in the stormwater management of the property. Per City Code §20-1118, 60° angled parking spaces have a minimum dimension of 9' x 18' spaces and 18.5' aisle widths. The City Code contains a figure to illustrate the required dimensions. EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Because the proposed plan will result in less than one acre of new impervious, it will not require a General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Program (NPDES Construction Permit). The plan must comply with Chapter 19 of Chanhassen City code. Planning Commission • • Bluff Creek Cottages — Planning Case 2013-8 July 16, 2013 Page 9of10 LANDSCAPING Minimum requirements for landscaping at Next Step Learning Center include 873 square feet of landscaped area around the parking lot, one landscape island or peninsula, three trees for the parking lot. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 873 sq. ft. >873 sq. ft. Trees/parking lot 3 trees 1 trees Islands or peninsulas/parking lot 1 island/peninsula 1 island/peninsula Applicant does not meet minimum requirements for trees. The applicant shall include a total of three trees. Staff recommends approval of the site plan for the construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare addition as shown in plans dated received April 18, 2014, subject to the following conditions of approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Environmental Resources Conditions 1. The applicant shall install a total of three trees around and/or within the parking lot. Enpneering Conditions 1. The applicant and their engineer shall explore alternate EOF to reduce pooling depth and area. 2. A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required. 3. The scale on the grading plans must be corrected. 4. The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the corners of the proposed structure. 5. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas. 6. The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1. 7. Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and aid in the stormwater management of the property per City Code §20-1118. 8. The erosion prevention and sediment control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of Chanhassen City Code. Planning Commission • • Bluff Creek Cottages — Planning Case 2013-8 July 16, 2013 Page 10 of 10 9. The applicant must procure and comply with all required approvals from applicable jurisdictional agencies. 10. The rip rap slope must be shown on the plans and erosion prevention and sediment control practices shall be modified to accommodate this disturbance. Building Official Conditions 1. The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. All plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Detailed occupancy and building area -related code requirements cannot be reviewed until further information is provided. 4. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Planning Conditions 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 2. Any new signs must comply with the sign ordinance requirements. 3. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. Light fixtures shall be downcast and the light shall be cut off at a 90 -degree angle as required by the city code. All fixtures shall be shielded. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Reduced Copy of Plans dated "Received April 18, 2014". 4. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing. g:\plan\2014 planning cases\2014-15 next steps learning center expansion\staff report.doc C, CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Next Steps Learning Center for a Site Plan Review for the Construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion — Planning Case No. 2014-15 On May 20, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Next Steps Learning Center for a Site Plan request for the construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare center addition for property located at 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park). The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed site plan preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned IOP, Industrial Office Park. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan Office/Industrial. 3. The legal description of the property is Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park. 4. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: a. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. Consistency with this division; c. Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; d. Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e. Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f. Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 5. The planning report #2014-15, dated May 20, 2014, prepared by Sharmeen Al-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 20' day of May 2014. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Its Chairman COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP MENT RECEIVED Planning DivisioBoulevard Mailing Address- P.O. Box— 7700arket 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 APR 18 20 CITY OF CgANNASSEN Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 CFAWAMPLNJI6R INM APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Date Filed: - g_± 60 -Day Review Deadline: fe--t' _, Planner: SrTs Case#:Ai14-IS Section•• • •' •• ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment .........................$600 Create 3 lots or less.........................................$300 rm $tl ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ...... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit Property Owners' List within 500..........$3 ❑ ❑ Single -Family Residence.................................$325 $300 + $50 per lot (City to generate - fee determined at pr 11 ti meeting) Escrow for Recording Documents .$so r document ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Lot Line Adjustment........................................$150 ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence..$325 Section 2: Required ❑ ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 Project Name: QA- S�(L! _ fi t. t i ❑ Grading > 1,000 cubic yards ........................... UBC ❑ Rezoning Escrow will be required for other applications through the ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD)...................$750 development contract. ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................$100 Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way ...................$300 ❑ All Others .........................................................$500 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Sign Plan Review...................................................$150 ❑ Subdivision Site Plan Review [IZoning Appeal ......................................................$100 Administrative ..................................................$100 Commercial/Industrial Districts` ......................$500 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ............................ $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area —(3,) NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, Include number of e>asting employees: 2 /7 the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. and number of new employees: _��e�v 3 ❑ Residential Districts .........................................$500 (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal Plus $5 per dwelling unit information that must accompany this application) ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES: Notification Sign ❑ Create 3 lots or less.........................................$300 rm $tl ................................................... (City to install and remove) ❑ Create over 3 lots ...................... $600 + $15 per lot Property Owners' List within 500..........$3 ❑ Metes & Bounds ........................ $300 + $50 per lot (City to generate - fee determined at pr 11 ti meeting) Escrow for Recording Documents .$so r document ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 (CUP/SPRNACNARMAP/Metes & s Subdivision) ❑ Lot Line Adjustment........................................$150 Section 2: Required ❑ Final Plat' ........................................................$250 Project Name: QA- S�(L! _ fi t. t i o n 'Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs. Property Address or Location: / �/3 O Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way ...................$300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Variance ............................................................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Single -Family Residence...............................$150 ❑ All Others .......................................................$275 Site Plan Review [IZoning Appeal ......................................................$100 Administrative ..................................................$100 Commercial/Industrial Districts` ......................$500 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ............................ $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area —(3,) NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, Include number of e>asting employees: 2 /7 the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. and number of new employees: _��e�v 3 ❑ Residential Districts .........................................$500 (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal Plus $5 per dwelling unit information that must accompany this application) ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES: Notification Sign TOTAL FEES: rm $tl ................................................... (City to install and remove) $200 Ne x.4 ­ i. eavr,. J Property Owners' List within 500..........$3 per addrets3 I Received from: t (City to generate - fee determined at pr 11 ti meeting) Escrow for Recording Documents .$so r document 7U Date Received: ( Check Number: ISO a (CUP/SPRNACNARMAP/Metes & s Subdivision) Section 2: Required Information Project Name: QA- S�(L! _ fi t. t i o n Property Address or Location: / �/3 O r Parcel #:25 7 �/ 0 0 a O Legal Description: L-.0-ii,VC T, --/---fes Total Acreage: Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes4j No Present Zoning: e3A�-0-0 r�•r._01"Z­__ Present Land Use Designation: Q. K e Existing Use of Property: Description of Proposal: A -, 4e4- � nor, .5 ::P9 -A!!� &a- &-O� e- �t �/ /-r i ❑ Check box if separate narrative is attached Requested Zoning: _ Requested Land Use Designation: =_04{rne_ -r APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name:, �v� �a �c(� IVCA.�—�Sle c I mrnin a Contact: Addres- '�`�� c� Phone: City/St Email: Signatt Cell: la 17 - S'o 1 — /'F 5 3 Fax: Date This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Addres. city/St. Contact: Phone: (,212— (O D � Cell: Email 4� �� nP k'11"2 P ' Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: Property Owner Via: ®'Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: c� �^ ApplicantVia: Engineer Via: Via:mail mail J:Email E] Mailed Paper Copy ElMailed Paper Copy ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: j W r- 0— City/St a/Zip:Other' Email:,-)( �:• .� APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: �o 1-1 v-2% .�9a ✓41 NLX - nc 11164a -A Contact: Address: Phone: City/Stateiup: ( ITo n A 4 C- AX /�7/V 3 t;- 5i i Email: Signati Cell: (o1Z- Soi - /`{ 5 3 Fax: Date: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Addres City/St; Contact: Phone: in 12— ' 7/$' - (O d ,%r Cell: Email 4 i/r d—,k',�4 p P iC // Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: Property Owner Applicant Via: Via:Email ® Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: c.V'� Address: Engineer Via: Email E] Mailed Paper Copy City/St to/Zip: _ fi� Other' Via: Email E]Mailed Paper Copy Email: cam:. n i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEWRTMENT RECENED Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CHANHASSEN Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 APR 1 F} 201 Phone: (952) 227-1300 /Fax: (952) 227-1110 CHANHA$$EN PLANNING APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Date Filed: 4— S-1 60 -Day Review Deadline: (e—I—i— IL Planner: �fTS Case #: —1 Section•• • •-apply) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment .........................$600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ...... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Single -Family Residence.................................$325 ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence..$325 ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 ❑ Grading > 1,000 cubic yards ........................... UBC ❑ Rezoning ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD)...................$750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................$100 ❑ All Others .........................................................$500 ❑ Sign Plan Review...................................................$150 ❑ Subdivision ❑ Create 3 lots or less.........................................$300 ❑ Create over 3 lots ...................... $600 + $15 per lot ❑ Metes & Bounds ........................ $300 + $50 per lot ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑ Final Plat` ........................................................$250 'Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way...................$300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Variance...............................................................$200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Single -Family Residence...............................$150 ❑ All Others.. ..................................................... $275 Site Plan Review ❑ Zoning Appeal ......................................................$100 Administrative .................................................$100 Commercial/Industrial Districts` .....................$500 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ............................ $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area -(3`) NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, 'Include number of existing employees: the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. and number of new employees: 3 ❑ Residential Districts.........................................$500 (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal Plus $5 per dwelling unit information that must accompany this application) ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES: Notification Sign ................................................... $200 TOTAL FEES: (City to install and remove) bb , (� Property Owners' List within 500.......... $3 per addre5s� I y Received from: (City to generate — fee determined at pr lication meeting) Escrow for Recording Documents.. $50/per document 50 Date Received: (CUP/SPR(VACNAR/WAP/Metes & s Subdivision) Section 2: Required Information Project Name: N Rfir --),"e Z7S Property Address or Location: U3 U L f - rp Check Check Number: ISO o1. Parcel Parcel #: 27 7 �/ 0 0,? O Legal Description: a � Total Acreage: ZI -j-. Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes-❑ No Present Zoning. 1K1&LZ4r%12_1(_/r rk Requested Zoning: _ �m-R_ Present Land Use Designation: 09i ,o 1mdus4,r,4 I Requested Land Use Designation: LZ LM, -- Existing Use of Property: `�in I ea rP. Description of Proposal: ir{ !�; ncr, 0 0 Check box if separate narrative is attached W 0 a C O 2 L)ui z ay °omrry z ILWO OW � y F Q Q U U 0 0 %E MUM ƒcc 4 / - � | ' ( ; , ya _ ■ \{°§ |/ � Q§ &§ _ ! �\ � \ \ d � � %E MUM ƒcc 4 / - � L a i S e" 45 yy C pp ixq l'�"G£S� deE d a£6. E4 EF L. N / c C roll N :.b'^w m Y.. 9rurumo.r rrixm� �w� L. N / c C N U m W � �l J 3f d In O CLU I 41 � Ill's Edi$_k Qjmd 's z�u x 88a l I / i I � i / :I I (/ \ \ems `• yyy � al I I s CREEK � W •� LL¢ d w N z U S U Ah Ah 0 i N N U Cl) c_ C ti L m d m N �in J LZ 3 Ul O g Q U C N +. 1 N N Lo N a� +1 S X o c Z �U 0 oNhe'Nh j n 0 I °ayj Kyo I .F �6f Jtv asnaa sora a+a 4m1l�AMVV.�Y.i1pV r icyj fP W'�A T�PITIMUdIX'ii S.Uz.V.g ���11 7P➢LYiYOIV NliMi 6 °e a � 4 Wa�� Pis .)(.A{'gj)y My F 0 i N N U Cl) c_ C ti L m d m N �in J LZ 3 Ul O g Q U C N +. 1 N N Lo N a� +1 S X o c Z �U 0 oNhe'Nh j n 0 I °ayj Kyo I .F �6f Jtv e -.. \ c / r' al I I� 940 / gIT4223• s _- - �-TOP of geek bank 930 ' i i EEK 1u o cam, z z z U ¢ uz� pV � d ¢ S x U 1 Il�e0000ceel�oo��l ...nv.awwwe.v.a�w.w.+�+v w•-w��'o`w sa z:a: e:�"' g[1Tn�v^r.'n syci3CII 6A[3L'I.S .➢.�BIFi ma xa ory amnvx mllllllllll�lllll 1 Il�e0000ceel�oo��l mllllllllll�lllll �s�ssal�easaai eol00000l0000lll ®IIIIIIIIIIINillll 7BE'E666666616666111 �tE�10�01fitt�011 ��G�G€€€OC€€�.1Q€111 1a!IlEE6G{GEG�GG111 �tllleellRllElll yE6�llsleHIM !�€L€ MINIMUM eA�e�eloo�seol �E�tt![Ettt�ttlll � -As���eles���sl ������������� meeeeeeeleeele® m�oo6©eeelr�eem 1 � .m�ro.a...„e 5 w.en-rtYt .w b.II.®4sd!Rtl� 'RI'l:��bRlfa[ M(�O39itlA,LY➢ rv+n nw. ua ^_' (Y� �r /, - wwvv �waYw. mu.�.mwry L]� _ �18LILFPtl1�'.Df�UUfRl8IIm3ITi �d[3..iLS .ILSSBIfi ... '3 �a a� i 9 i ) ! ; }){!t \ !#ƒ§§! =!�&i#,! �\) 2 LLI � CD ® ■ \ I@ . ) ! ; }){!t \ !#ƒ§§! =!�&i#,! �\) 2 It tv )§ m - � ,• \ , LL 7 � !§\ , ,• \ , � !§\ _!| !!! ,• !., , / _!| ��^r OFCHAtvMAS�EI`� 4or dk FECEIVE� a�PlA u ���� A2: ALED3T78 K2®18(° C WPIIDs) D4MINf198Ei`+p(,p�ININ6lFGT P54-11-20D2 WTEs. me Ilam las lanor LLL Fl Is a aoaY[I d many nnabka dry kmp lumen aeaenadon nLo1 Ms lain apples m the nlwlaaM nw Ns unless Mmrwlw ret<tl, iM LLn h Me rpult (quunent d mun l umenF l mldal lumme pn 4mp man uli[lurm' sae[Pudons venirvtlenrtluosbvxnln to intheeslwlatWwuest.Meerode penis l aliotes neo cd l.ttM MNbMi1, renlGl or ln[Ilnea esaeslB^<tea l^111<ukuletbn wmmery. Meleronenvtbnlinormilao lle panedcal[Ylatgn. ibe [el[ubteU muNs d MJIBMIry slmulaabn repesent an mltl W reE petlkd^n d yprem peelamarce. th. -meawrea n W u mry V dry hom IM andrl yntl pMarmana a na are su0lttt to means a rq melnoas wI1M ere beYUM me[onnd W MB LgMln9.ln[. Mpuntlnydel9Maelerminallpn lspb Mtetpe[IN[.^urllgMing 9mWanonsaswmeamouMlrg nNgM llnxnl^n ylnlolalle luminaln sYmWilto bebwar the lepd the symMlbr[e01rg mounted Wmwon aMn the Wtho al Me rymMlbr ell oll'M luminNe mpuldrg[enllgurelbnx FRP llglllln9 PNprN F. bb WmC $[ale:aamW noludlow Aee.Wnnral<xl d)HI Kare Faterbr RAB Vdu Nundw: 18897]] I. k}IEFBGRWp 1130 PakCaun pMnLl6/Ibla L I G H T I N G F-NUM-'. 189BYu.1131 rete I eIIUAn xo CNnxanen.Mry 5531) Newrvope.Mry ssar LIBNdy Wart de519nea bepna SLtMarCs. FmeOMdress:xxw.rabweb.[om ]613M31N VbsbnC P'awnMMhMIINMkwly nglneereamp<rlam. -. . fllenme:11MB3TOflFGE-I\Oo[x\Saler\Appllullom Enylneering\lob Files\P\Pouter Group\NWrg fleori<\Minneapolis -Mankato 1039P3V Care HLerbrUGlOkiWENiEO N{are EjkaoM1eyout 011)NCdGI P"203 Calculation Summs 40N CakT I» Units A Mex Min Avg/Min Min MWMin Msalptbn MSpdr Pts 1p MaMr TYI» Area Illuminance Fc 0.51 10.1 0.0 N.A. N.A. Readings Taken at 0'-41 0 Lumineln Bchadub WmNo T ( ) 4MI % Y MTG NT Or4nt Symbol i Label Nra lum. Lumam 'AFG 10 10 Mo6zon[al ��^r OFCHAtvMAS�EI`� 4or dk FECEIVE� a�PlA u ���� A2: ALED3T78 K2®18(° C WPIIDs) D4MINf198Ei`+p(,p�ININ6lFGT P54-11-20D2 WTEs. me Ilam las lanor LLL Fl Is a aoaY[I d many nnabka dry kmp lumen aeaenadon nLo1 Ms lain apples m the nlwlaaM nw Ns unless Mmrwlw ret<tl, iM LLn h Me rpult (quunent d mun l umenF l mldal lumme pn 4mp man uli[lurm' sae[Pudons venirvtlenrtluosbvxnln to intheeslwlatWwuest.Meerode penis l aliotes neo cd l.ttM MNbMi1, renlGl or ln[Ilnea esaeslB^<tea l^111<ukuletbn wmmery. Meleronenvtbnlinormilao lle panedcal[Ylatgn. ibe [el[ubteU muNs d MJIBMIry slmulaabn repesent an mltl W reE petlkd^n d yprem peelamarce. th. -meawrea n W u mry V dry hom IM andrl yntl pMarmana a na are su0lttt to means a rq melnoas wI1M ere beYUM me[onnd W MB LgMln9.ln[. Mpuntlnydel9Maelerminallpn lspb Mtetpe[IN[.^urllgMing 9mWanonsaswmeamouMlrg nNgM llnxnl^n ylnlolalle luminaln sYmWilto bebwar the lepd the symMlbr[e01rg mounted Wmwon aMn the Wtho al Me rymMlbr ell oll'M luminNe mpuldrg[enllgurelbnx FRP llglllln9 PNprN F. bb WmC $[ale:aamW noludlow Aee.Wnnral<xl d)HI Kare Faterbr RAB Vdu Nundw: 18897]] I. k}IEFBGRWp 1130 PakCaun pMnLl6/Ibla L I G H T I N G F-NUM-'. 189BYu.1131 rete I eIIUAn xo CNnxanen.Mry 5531) Newrvope.Mry ssar LIBNdy Wart de519nea bepna SLtMarCs. FmeOMdress:xxw.rabweb.[om ]613M31N VbsbnC P'awnMMhMIINMkwly nglneereamp<rlam. -. . fllenme:11MB3TOflFGE-I\Oo[x\Saler\Appllullom Enylneering\lob Files\P\Pouter Group\NWrg fleori<\Minneapolis -Mankato 1039P3V Care HLerbrUGlOkiWENiEO N{are EjkaoM1eyout 011)NCdGI P"203 Calculation Summs 40N CakT I» Units A Mex Min Avg/Min Min MWMin Msalptbn MSpdr Pts 1p MaMr TYI» Area Illuminance Fc 0.51 10.1 0.0 N.A. N.A. Readings Taken at 0'-41 0 Lumineln Bchadub WmNo T ( ) 4MI % Y MTG NT Or4nt Symbol i Label Nra lum. Lumam An, Lum. Lumanf LLF Dascriptlan Lum. Walb An. Walt Total Watts Filename 1 R ALED3TJBv2@180° BACK -BACK 6911 13822 1.000 ]BwT III ]8.4 166b 156.8 ALED3T7B-CaoI-RL]9606.IE6 1 C WPlED52 SINGLE 5896 6896 1.000 62w Wall ack-16°U tik 60.7 60] 60.7 WPlED62�Cool-fRl9]60.ks Lumineln loutbn Summa WmNo T ( ) 4MI % Y MTG NT Or4nt TIN 1 C(U WPLED62 238.3 294.6 14 332.793 0 2 A2121 ALED3T78112@1B0° 2681 260.4 20 55.774 0 Total Duantlry� 2 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on May 8, 2014, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Next Steps Learning Center Site Plan Review — Planning Case 2014-15 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me tbis2t� day of (Ylcq , 2014. _ T Notary P 'c 3�, KIM T. MEUWISSE ��-.' Notary Publ�-Minnesota 'b;�v. MY Cort"'i°do^ ESM°. Jen 3t, 2Q15 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Site Plan Review with Variances for a 3,000 Proposal: square -foot building expansion on property zoned Industrial Office Park (IOP)— NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER Applicant: Jeremy S aude Property 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park) Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-15. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff by email at saliaff(cDci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952 - Questions & 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions. Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Weiland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested parry is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings. land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Site Plan Review with Variances for a 3,000 Proposal: square -foot building expansion on property zoned Industrial Office Park IOP — NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER Applicant Jeremy Spaude Property 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: • 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-15. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff by email at Jaff &ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952 - Questions & 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alteralft Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified oft e application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota Stale Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be Included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. DAVID SWARTOUT 10028 INDIGO DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-1206 PRN MUSIC CORPORATION 7801 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8201 TWO S PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 25025 GLENDALE, CA 91201-5025 K & L PARTNERS 14417 LAKE STREET EXT MINNETONKA, MN 55345-2923 SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC 1430 PARK CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8901 0 MUSTANG LLC 7860 PARK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9294 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD MAILSTOP ST PAUL, MN 55155-1899 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MAY 20, 2014 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, Lisa Hokkanen, Maryam Yusuh, and Steve Weick MEMBERS ABSENT: Kim Tennyson STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner; and Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT: Dan Campion 340 Trappers Pass PUBLIC HEARING: NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER: REOUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES FOR A 3.000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING EXPANSION ON PROPERTY ZONED INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK (1OP) AND LOCATED AT 1430 PARK COURT (LOT 1. BLOCK 2. PARK). APPLICANT: JEREMY SPAUDE, PLANNING CASE 2014-15. Al-Jaff: Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission. Brief correction to the staff report. Initially we said that this will appear before the City Council on May 20th. We're actually, I'm sorry June. It was said that in the staff report that this would appear before the City Council on June 9'h. We're actually moving it to May 27th so just minor correction. Aller: Okay so for the record that will be May 27, 2014 and for those individuals at home or present that are watching this item, the reports are found on the Chanhassen website as well so please go ahead and take a look at those before the meetings. AI-Jaff: The site is located at 1430 Park Road. It is bordered by Highway 5 to the north and Park Court to the east. Riley Creek runs to the west of the subject site. The site is zoned Industrial Office Park. It is accessed off of Park Court and there is a daycare center on the site as well as a, a daycare on the site as well as a play area to the north of the daycare center. Just a brief background on this site. Back in October of 1988 the City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a daycare center. There was also a variance that was granted and the variance is for the parking lot. The parking area that is located immediately to the southeast corner, portion of the site. City code requires that it maintains a 10 foot setback and in this case it was at zero and it was to provide parking for the site that's immediately to the west of the subject site. Or to the east, I'm sorry. The proposal before you today looks at adding a 3,000 square foot addition to the site. The addition will be located southwest of the existing building and the total area for both the addition as well as the existing building is going to be approximately 10,000 square feet. They, the building meets all ordinance requirements. Bluff Creek is located to the west of the subject site. City Code requires that it maintain, all structures maintain a minimum of 50 feet from the center line of the creek. In this case it exceeds 70 feet at the closest point. In addition to that there are trees throughout this area and they will remain undisturbed so all of these requirements are met. As far as parking goes, the city code requires 1 parking space per 6 children. They will have a capacity of 119 kids within this building. That translates to 20 parking spaces. They are providing 28 parking spaces. As far as the building itself and the architecture, this is the area that will be Chanhassen Planning Commission — May 20, 2014 • added. This is what any individual that will be approaching the building, that would be the fagade that they will see. They are introducing an entrance and it is pronounced. You will be able to see it and locate the entrance into the building. Fenestration as well as transparency meets ordinance requirements. Keep in mind that this is an existing building so we're just trying to meet the exact same standards as the existing. Materials are shown, there we go. Okay, materials again they match the existing building. Face block as well as EFIS. And then the frames of the building will also, frames for the windows will also match the existing building. Staff is recommending approval of this site plan for the construction of 3,000 square feet of daycare expansion subject to conditions in the staff report and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. I'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. Aller: Any questions? Weick: Is there? Aller: Mr. Weick Weick: Yeah. Is there, it looks like there was, is there water? Some kind of runoff or something added? Is that new? Or what is that feature I guess? The blue. Aller: Retention pond? AI -Jaffa Correct. It's a retention pond and it's a day. Go ahead Alyson. Fauske: I'd be happy to answer your question. The proposal before you and the area outlined in blue and shaded in blue is intended to be a dry pond and what a dry pond is, is it collects water after a rainfall event and slowly and eventually that, the entire amount of water that's in that basin will dissipate and discharge down the slope so the intent is to try to mediate, mediate an erosion issue that exists on the site. Aller: And then to follow up with that, the addition of the 28 parking spots, is that going to be a problem with the erosion or runoff? Fauske: That was factored into the design so the applicant's engineer worked with staff in order to accommodate the additional discharge rates and with the proposed pond in the existing in place system they meet the requirements. Aller: Great. Again any questions? Ahight, thank you. If the applicant wishes to step forward and make a presentation they can do so. They don't have to but if they'd like to that's fine. Or just introduce yourself would be great. Jeremy Spaude: Sure, Jeremy Spaude, 1430 Park Court. I think Sharmeen covered it well. We're just looking to add a gym and really make our entrance and our parking lot flow really well for what we have now. Aller: Welcome sir. And you've had a copy of the report and you've reviewed all the conditions. Jeremy Spaude: Correct. Aller: And you're willing to do anything with the City or at least work with the City to make sure that the requirements are met. Jeremy Spaude: Correct. Yep, Sharmeen's been a great partner. Chanhassen Planning Commission — May 20, 2014 • Aller: Wonderful. Any other questions or anything you'd like to say? Jeremy Spaude: Nope, I think we're good. Aller: Perfect, thank you. At this point we'll open the public hearing portion of this matter. Anyone wishing to speak either for or against the item can step forward at this time and do so. Seeing no one coming forward I'm going to close the public hearing portion and open it for discussion then if any. It's an addition to an existing building. It meets the hard cover requirements and they've taken into account the impact in creating the dry pond so it looks pretty straight forward. Weick: There were only minor additions, yeah. Aller: Anyone wish to make a motion? Yusuf: I'll make the motion. Aller: Okay. Yusuf: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve a site plan for construction of a 3,000 square foot daycare expansion subject to the conditions of approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Weick: Second. Aller: I have a motion by Commissioner Yusuf, seconded by Commissioner Weick All those or any discussion? Further discussion. Yusuf moved, Weick seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve a Site Plan for construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare addition as shown in plans dated received April 18, 2014, subject to the following conditions of approval; and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Environmental Resources Conditions 1. The applicant shall install a total of three trees around and/or within the parking lot. Engineering eering Conditions 1. The applicant and their engineer shall explore alternate EOF to reduce pooling depth and area. 2. A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required. 3. The scale on the grading plans must be corrected. 4. The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the corners of the proposed structure. Chanhassen Planning Commission — May 20, 2014 • 5. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas. 6. The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1. 7. Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and aid in the stormwater management of the property per City Code §20-1118. 8. The erosion prevention and sediment control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of Chanhassen City Code. 9. The applicant must procure and comply with all required approvals from applicable jurisdictional agencies. 10. The rip rap slope must be shown on the plans and erosion prevention and sediment control practices shall be modified to accommodate this disturbance. Building Official Conditions 1. The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. All plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Detailed occupancy and building area -related code requirements cannot be reviewed until finther information is provided. 4. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Planning Conditions 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 2. Any new signs must comply with the sign ordinance requirements. 3. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. Light fixtures shall be downcast and the light shall be cut off at a 90 -degree angle as required by the city code. All fixtures shall be shielded. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 4 0 1�-Is CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MAY 20, 2014 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, Lisa Hokkanen, Maryam Yusuh, and Steve Weick MEMBERS ABSENT: Kim Tennyson STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner; and Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT: Dan Campion 340 Trappers Pass PUBLIC HEARING: NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER: REOUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES FOR A 3.000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING EXPANSION ON PROPERTY ZONED INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK (IOP) AND LOCATED AT 1430 PARK COURT (LOT 1. BLOCK 2. ROME PARK). APPLICANT: JEREMY SPAUDE, PLANNING CASE 2014-15. Al-Jaff: Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission. Brief correction to the staff report. Initially we said that this will appear before the City Council on May 201. We're actually, I'm sorry June. It was said that in the staff report that this would appear before the City Council on June 91. We're actually moving it to May 271 so just minor correction. Aller: Okay so for the record that will be May 27, 2014 and for those individuals at home or present that are watching this item, the reports are found on the Chanhassen website as well so please go ahead and take a look at those before the meetings. Al-Jaff: The site is located at 1430 Park Road. It is bordered by Highway 5 to the north and Park Court to the east. Riley Creek runs to the west of the subject site. The site is zoned Industrial Office Park. It is accessed off of Park Court and there is a daycare center on the site as well as a, a daycare on the site as well as a play area to the north of the daycare center. Just a brief background on this site. Back in October of 1988 the City Council approved a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a daycare center. There was also a variance that was granted and the variance is for the parking lot. The parking area that is located immediately to the southeast comer, portion of the site. City code requires that it maintains a 10 foot setback and in this case it was at zero and it was to provide parking for the site that's immediately to the west of the subject site. Or to the east, I'm sorry. The proposal before you today looks at adding a 3,000 square foot addition to the site. The addition will be located southwest of the existing building and the total area for both the addition as well as the existing building is going to be approximately 10,000 square feet. They, the building meets all ordinance requirements. Bluff Creek is located to the west of the subject site. City Code requires that it maintain, all structures maintain a minimum of 50 feet from the center line of the creek. In this case it exceeds 70 feet at the closest point. In addition to that there are trees throughout this area and they will remain undisturbed so all of these requirements are met. As far as parking goes, the city code requires 1 parking space per 6 children. They will have a capacity of 119 kids within this building. That translates to 20 parking spaces. They are providing 28 parking spaces. As far as the building itself and the architecture, this is the area that will be SCANNED Chanhassen Planning Comm bion — May 20, 2014 added. This is what any individual that will be approaching the building, that would be the fagade that they will see. They are introducing an entrance and it is pronounced. You will be able to see it and locate the entrance into the building. Fenestration as well as transparency meets ordinance requirements. Keep in mind that this is an existing building so we're just trying to meet the exact same standards as the existing. Materials are shown, there we go. Okay, materials again they match the existing building. Face block as well as EFIS. And then the frames of the building will also, frames for the windows will also match the existing building. Staff is recommending approval of this site plan for the construction of 3,000 square feet of daycare expansion subject to conditions in the staff report and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. I'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. Aller: Any questions? Weick: Is there? Aller: Mr. Weick. Weick: Yeah. Is there, it looks like there was, is there water? Some kind of runoff or something added? Is that new? Or what is that feature I guess? The blue. Aller: Retention pond? AI -Jaffa Correct. It's a retention pond and it's a day. Go ahead Alyson. Fauske: I'd be happy to answer your question. The proposal before you and the area outlined in blue and shaded in blue is intended to be a dry pond and what a dry pond is, is it collects water after a rainfall event and slowly and eventually that, the entire amount of water that's in that basin will dissipate and discharge down the slope so the intent is to try to mediate, mediate an erosion issue that exists on the site. Aller: And then to follow up with that, the addition of the 28 parking spots, is that going to be a problem with the erosion or runoff? Fauske: That was factored into the design so the applicant's engineer worked with staff in order to accommodate the additional discharge rates and with the proposed pond in the existing in place system they meet the requirements. Aller: Great. Again any questions? Alright, thank you. If the applicant wishes to step forward and make a presentation they can do so. They don't have to but if they'd like to that's fine. Or just introduce yourself would be great. Jeremy Spaude: Sure, Jemmy Spaude, 1430 Park Court. I think Sharmeen covered it well. We're just looking to add a gym and really make our entrance and our parking lot flow really well for what we have now. Aller: Welcome sir. And you've had a copy of the report and you've reviewed all the conditions. Jeremy Spaude: Correct. Aller: And you're willing to do anything with the City or at least work with the City to make sure that the requirements are met. Jeremy Spaude: Correct. Yep, Sharmeen's been a great partner. Chanhassen Planning Commission — May 20, 2014 • Aller: Wonderful. Any other questions or anything you'd like to say? Jeremy Spaude: Nope, I think we're good. Aller: Perfect, thank you. At this point we'll open the public hearing portion of this matter. Anyone wishing to speak either for or against the item can step forward at this time and do so. Seeing no one coming forward I'm going to close the public hearing portion and open it for discussion then if any. It's an addition to an existing building. It meets the hard cover requirements and they've taken into account the impact in creating the dry pond so it looks pretty straight forward. Weick: There were only minor additions, yeah. Aller: Anyone wish to make a motion? Yusuf: I'll make the motion. Aller: Okay. Yusuf: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve a site plan for construction of a 3,000 square foot daycare expansion subject to the conditions of approval and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Weick: Second. Aller: I have a motion by Commissioner Yusuf, seconded by Commissioner Weick. All those or any discussion? Further discussion. Yusuf moved, Weick seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve a Site Plan for construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare addition as shown in plans dated received April 18, 2014, subject to the following conditions of approval; and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Environmental Resources Conditions 1. The applicant shall install a total of three trees around and/or within the parking lot. Engineering Conditions 1. The applicant and their engineer shall explore alternate EOF to reduce pooling depth and area. 2. A soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope is required. 3. The scale on the grading plans must be corrected. 4. The existing and proposed elevations must be shown at the comers of the proposed structure. Chanhassen Planning Commis ion — May 20, 2014 5. The plan shall be revised to show locations of proposed stockpile areas. 6. The proposed grades shall be no steeper than 3:1. 7. Staff recommends the use of minimum parking dimensions to reduce hard surface cover and aid in the stormwater management of the property per City Code §20-1118. 8. The erosion prevention and sediment control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of Chanhassen City Code. 9. The applicant must procure and comply with all required approvals from applicable jurisdictional agencies. 10. The rip rap slope must be shown on the plans and erosion prevention and sediment control practices shall be modified to accommodate this disturbance. Building Official Conditions 1. The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. All plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Detailed occupancy and building area -related code requirements cannot be reviewed until further information is provided. 4. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Planning Conditions 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 2. Any new signs must comply with the sign ordinance requirements. 3. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. Light fixtures shall be downcast and the light shall be cut off at a 90 -degree angle as required by the city code. All fixtures shall be shielded. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: 1601 & 1701 BLUFF CREEK DRIVE: REOUEST FOR AN "AFTER -THE -FACT" INTERIM BETWEEN MAY AND OCTOBER 2013: AND A REQUEST FOR AN INTERIM USE PERMIT 4 ! • • I4—IS) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Next Steps Learning Center for a Site Plan Review for the Construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare expansion — Planning Case No. 2014-15 On May 20, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Next Steps Learning Center for a Site Plan request for the construction of a 3,000 square -foot daycare center addition for property located at 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park). The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed site plan preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned IOP, Industrial Office Park. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan Office/Industrial. 3. The legal description of the property is Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park. 4. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: a. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; b. Consistency with this division; c. Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; d. Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; e. Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; SCANNED S] • Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f. Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 5. The planning report #2014-15, dated May 20, 2014, prepared by Sharmeen Al-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 20`s day of May 2014. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: is Chairman Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized CARVER & HENNEPIN - agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- COUNTIES lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal PLANNING CASE NO. 2014-15 newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN amended. that the Chanhassen Planning y ; Commission will hold a public (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. J hearing on Tuesday, May 20, was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Cha b rs p.m. in the Council Notice is herebyincorporated as art of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of Chambers in Chanhassen City the news fied Printed below is a c of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both Hall, se o Market Blvd. The ,and shed copy P purpose of this hearing is to inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used N the composition consider a request for Site Plan and publication of the Notice: Review with Variances for a 3,000 square -foot building expansion abcdefghijklmnopgrs ryz on property zoned Industrial Office Park (IOP) and located at 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2;""' " V ` . �r'CI '" "y " - ^' • _ — Rome Park). Applicant: Jeremy By Spaude- Laurie A. Hartmann A planshowing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at wwwci.chanhassen. Subscribed and sworn before me on mn.us/2014-15 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested personsare united V to attend thisspublic ic hearing and express their opinions with this day of 2014 respect to this proposal. Sharmeen AI -Jail, Senior Planner Email: saljatf@ci.chanhassen. JYMNE JCFtr?�TE BARK mn.us Phone: 952-227-1134 NOTARY PI;BUC - 4.N1.=SC'k (Published in the Chanhassenblit ,� - MY COiJ:ASSuN cC�.flES 01r31('3 Villager on Thursday, May 9, 2014• No 494.5) RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space .... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.59 per column inch SCANNen 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2014-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, May 20, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Site Plan Review with Variances for a 3,000 square -foot building expansion on property zoned Industrial Office Park (IOP) and located at 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park). Applicant: Jeremy Spaude. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-15 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Shanneen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Email: saliaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1134 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on May 8, 2014) *CANNED 0 To: Shamieen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner, City of Chanhassen From: Scott Sobiech, PE Subject: Next Steps Learning Center Expansion Development Review by Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District Date: May 8, 2014 Page: 2 Review Comments The City of Chanhassen requested that the RPBCWD review the proposed development at the Next Steps Learning Center based on the draft RPBCWD rules. Table 1 summarizes the RPBCWD rules that would likely apply to the project based on the information submitted. Table 1: RPBCWD Rule Summary RPBCWD Rules Applicable to Project Rule B: Floodplain Rule C: Erosion and Sediment Control X Rule D: Wetland, Lake and Creek Buffers X Rule E: Dredging and Sediment Removal Rule F: Shoreline and Streambank Stabilization Rule G: Waterbody Crossings and Structures Rule H: Appropriation of Public Surface Water Rule I: Appropriation of Groundwater Rule 1: Storrnwater Management X The following sections provide specific review comments related to the rules that would apply to this project. Rule C: Erosion and Sediment Control Since he project involves disturbance of approximately 0.5 acres, it would require a permit based on the draft rules. In the draft rules, Rule C is applicable when a project disturbs greater than 5,000 square feet. The draft rules require that an erosion and sediment control plan be prepared. The requirements of the erosion and sediment control plan are listed in Rule C, Section 3.1 of the draft RPBCWD rules. The submitted design plans include temporary silt fence, but do not show any other erosion and sediment control practices. A rock construction entrance shall be used at the access point to the site. A sediment control measure must be used to prevent sediment laden discharge from entering the creek during construction. This includes the discharge leaving the site through the spillway to the creek. The erosion and sediment control plan should also include provisions to minimize the disturbance intensity and duration by phasing disturbance where possible. In the draft rules, slopes of 3:1(H:V), such as on the outlet berm from the dry pond, shall be adequately stabilized. Stormwater facilities shall be protected during construction, and all construction site waste shall be properly managed including concrete truck washout The draft rules require that all temporary erosion and sediment control BMPs be maintained until the completion of construction and vegetation is established sufficiently, and then must be removed. Soil surfaces disturbed or compacted during construction and remaining pervious must be decompacted to a SCANNED 0 0 To: Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner, City of Chanhassen From: Scott Sobiech, PE Subject: Next Steps Learning Center Expansion Development Review by Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District Date: May 8, 2014 Page: 3 depth of 18 inches prior to final revegetation. All disturbed areas must be stabilized within 7 calendar days. The draft rules require that the permit holder inspect and maintain all erosion and sediment control facilities, features and techniques until final site stabilization. A log must be kept of the inspections and be available to the District upon request. Rule C, Section 4 of the draft rules details the required information and exhibits that would need to accompany an Erosion and Sediment Control Permit Application. Rule D: Wetland, Lake and Creek Buffers Because the project disturbs greater than 5,000 square feet and will therefore require a permit through Rule 1: Stormwater Management of the draft rules, the project would need to be considered for a permit through Rule D of the draft rules. The project is adjacent to Riley Creek, which is a public water. Therefore, an average buffer width of 50 feet and a minimum buffer width of 30 feet along Riley Creek would be required through the draft rules. The wooded area currently present along Riley Creek likely meets the buffer requirements of the draft rules. However, the draft rules require additional information and documentation be provided. The buffer area would need to be documented, marked in the field, and recorded as such in accordance with Rule D, Section 3.2. The buffer alterations made by constructing the riprap spillway from the dry pond outlet to Riley Creek would need to be constructed in accordance with Rule D, Section 4 of the draft rules. This includes additional documentation in the erosion and sediment control plan, minimizing disturbed area in the buffer, and native restoration of disturbed areas. Rule D, Section 7 outlines the required information and exhibits that would be required through the draft rules. Rule J: Stormwater Management Because the proposed project disturbs more than 5,000 square feet, the project would require a permit with an approved stonnwater management plan through the draft rule. The stormwater management rule includes criteria for 1) peak runoff rates, 2) volume abstraction, and 3) water quality. Depending on the area of disturbance, these criteria would apply to different portions of the site. If the project disturbs more than 50 percent of the existing impervious surface or increases the impervious area by more than 50 percent, the criteria would apply to the entire project parcel. Otherwise, the criteria would only apply to the disturbed areas and additional impervious surface on the project parcel. The project does not increase the impervious area by more than 50 percent. The provided project documentation does not quantify the amount of impervious area that will be disturbed. The listed area of total disturbance is 0.5 acres. For the purposes of this review, it is assumed that the proposed project disturbs less than 50 percent of the 0 To: Shormeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner, City of Chanhassen From: Scott Sobiech, PE SubJeet: Next Steps Learning Center Expansion Development Review by Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District Dale. May 8, 2014 Page: 4 existing impervious, and the criteria outlined in the draft rules would be applied to disturbed areas and new impervious area. The HydroCAD model and the drainage maps do not match for areas 51.2 and 51.3. The time of concentration used in the HydroCAD model may not be appropriate based on the size and ground cover in each area. Please verify these inputs and adjust the design if necessary. There is a discrepancy in the berm elevation between the HydroCAD model and the design plans. The HydroCAD model shows the overflow at 950.4, and the plans show the top of bene at 950.8. Please verify the overflow elevation and adjust the design accordingly. Overflows from the dry pond during the 100 - year event should be minimized. The slope of the berm must be stabilized in such a manner that it provides sufficient erosion protection during the 100 -year event. The plans show a riprap slope being used at the primary outlet from the dry pond. Please provide additional information including the extents of the riprap slope in plan view and the downstream limits of the riprap slope. Please provide computations verifying that Class II riprap provides adequate erosion protection from the discharge from the dry pond and that the spillway is designed to contain flows from the 100 -year event. Please also verify that the sod shown on the slope above the riprap slope will be stable when the dry pond overflows. The 4" PVC outlet from the dry pond has a very high risk of plugging, increasing the risk of the pond overtopping the berm. We would recommend reconfiguring the inlet to incorporate skimming to reduce the risk of plugging. A preferred altemative would be to utilize a sump structure at the inlet, increase the diameter of the inlet pipe, and use an elbow section to provide skimming. In accordance with the draft rules, the project would be required to use Atlas 14 rainfall data in the implementation of its stonnwater management plan. The plan would be required to limit peak runoff rates for the 2-,10-, and 100 -year frequency storm events using a nested 24-hour rainfall distribution and a 100 -year frequency, 10 -day snowmelt event. The stormwater management plan for the project does address peak runoff rates for the 2-,10-, and 100 -year frequency storm events; however, the events were modeled using TP -40 rainfall data and the SCS Type H distribution. This rainfall data needs to be updated to Atlas 14 information and the 100 -year, 10 -day snowmelt event needs to be considered to be in compliance with the draft rules. The updated hydrology must be performed to verify the project meets rate control requirements. The draft rules require that the project provide for the volume abstraction onsite of 1.1 inches of runoff from all disturbed areas and all new impervious areas. Pretreatment must be provided for infiltration or filtration practices. The proposed plans include a dry pond; however, the dry pond has no features that 0 0 To: Shormeen AI-Jaff. Senior Planner, City of Chanhassen From: Scott Sobiech, PE Subject Next Steps Learning Center Expansion Development Review by Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District Date., May 8, 2014 Pace: 5 would provide for the abstraction of runoff. The dry pond would need to be modified or additional BMPs added to the site. The draft rules also require that the project provide for at least 75% annual removal efficiency for total phosphorus (TP), and at least 90% annual removal efficiency for total suspended solids (TSS) from runoff from all disturbed areas and all new impervious areas. The project would need to submit verification that its design meets these requirements. Rule J, Section 3.4 outlines the maintenance requirements for all stormwater management structures. All stormwater management features must be properly maintained in perpetuity to ensure that they continue to function as designed. A maintenance plan would need to accompany the permit application. Rule J, Section 4 outlines the required exhibits that would need to accompany the permit application. In addition to information that was provided as part of the current submittal, a permit application would need to include a geotechnical analysis including soil borings at proposed stormwater management facilities, and computations completed to design the retention BMPs, and a narrative addressing incorporation of retention BMPs. Summary Based on the information provided to date, the proposed design does not meet the permit requirements of the RPBCWD draft rules. The draft rules would require the project to obtain Erosion and Sediment Control; Wetland, Lake, and Creek Buffer, and Stormwater Management permits. To be in compliance with the draft rules, the project would need to submit an erosion and sediment control plan showing control measures to protect Riley Creek during and after construction. These erosion and sediment control measures would need to be in addition to the silt fence currently shown on the design plans. To meet the draft buffer requirements, the project would need to designate, mark, and record the wooded buffer between Riley Creek and the development and preserve and maintain the area in accordance with the buffer requirements. Additional information and revised computations are needed to meet the draft Stormwater Management rules. Design computations must use Atlas 14 reference data and nested 24-hour rainfall data and must include the 100 -year, 10 -day snowmelt event. For all disturbed areas and all new impervious areas, the project must provide rate control at all discharge points for the 2-, 10-, 100 -year rainfall events and the 100 -year, 10 -day snowmelt event. The project must also provide volume abstraction of 1.1 inches of runoff, 75% annual removal efficiency of TP, and 90% annual removal efficiency of TSS from all disturbed 0 0 To: Sharmeen AI-Joff, Senior Planner, City of Chanhassen From: Scott Sobiech, PE Subject Next Steps Learning Center Expansion Development Review by Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District Date: May 8, 2014 Page: 6 areas and new impervious area. Additionally, the inputs to the HydroCAD model need to be verified for appropriate times of concentration and overflow elevations. More information is needed on the design of the riprap slope and its extents. The outlet design from the dry pond should be reviewed for additional options to provide improved skimming to minimize plugging and maintain BMP function. 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner FROM: Jerritt Mohn, Building Official DATE: April 22, 2014 is SUBJ: Request for Site Plan Review with Variances for a 3,000 square -foot building expansion on property zoned Industrial Office Park (IOP) and located at 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park). Planning Case: 2014-15 I have reviewed the plans for the above building addition received by the Planning Department on April 18, 2014. Following are my comments, which should be included as conditions of approval. 1. The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. All plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Detailed occupancy and building area related code requirements cannot be reviewed until further information is provided. 4. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. G:\PLAN\2014 Planning Cases\2014-15 Next Steps Learning Center Expansion\buildingofi3cialcwmments.doc SCANNED Date: April 21, 2014 • City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department Review Response Deadline: Mav 8.2014 By: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner (952) 227-1134 saljaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Subject: Request for Site Plan Review with Variances for a 3,000 square -foot building expansion on property zoned Industrial Office Park (IOP) and located at 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park). Applicant: Jeremy Spaude Planning Case: 2014-15 PID: 25-7510020 The above-described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on April 18, 2014. The 60 -day review period ends June 17, 2014. hr order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on May 20, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than May 8, 2014. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official E Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint(United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco SCANNED 0 Property Card Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC Mailing Address 1430 PARK CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8901 Property Address Address 1430 PARK CT City CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 Parcel ID Number 257510020 Parcel Information Uses Commercial GIS Acres 2.20 Tax Acres Plat ROME PARK Lot 002 Block 001 Tax Description EXC: HWY R -O -W PARCEL 220B MNDOT R -O -W PLAT 10-10 Building Style Year Built Building Information Finished Sq Ft Other Garage N Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead 0112 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF N CREEK Assessor Information Bedrooms Bathrooms Green Acres Ag Preserve N N Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale (Payable 2014) (Payable 2015) Land $257,100.00 $257,100.00 Date of Sale 11/2612012 Building $385,600.00 $385,600.00 Sale Value $700,000.00 Total $642,700.00 $642,700.00 Qualified/ U Unqualified Disclaimer.- This information is to be used for reference purposes only Carver County does not guarantee accuracy of the material contained herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota stalutes 466 03, Subd 21 (2000). and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages, and T expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Count' from any and all claims brought by User, CARVER its employees or agents, or third parties which arse out of the usefs access or use of data providetl. COUNTY Monday, Apra 21, 2014 Carver County, MN Page 1 of 1 Date: April 21, 2014 • City of Chanhassen • 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department Review Response Deadline: May 8.2014 By: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner (952) 227-1134 saljaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Subject: Request for Site Plan Review with Variances for a 3,000 square -foot building expansion on property zoned Industrial Office Park (IOP) and located at 1430 Park Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Rome Park). Applicant: Jeremy Spaude Planning Case: 2014-15 PID: 25-7510020 The above-described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on April 18, 2014. The 60 -day review period ends June 17, 2014. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on May 20, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than May 8, 2014. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint/United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco SCANNED Property Card Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC Mailing Address 1430 PARK CT CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-8901 Property Address Address 1430 PARK CT City CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 • Parcel ID Number 257510020 Parcel Information Uses Commercial GIS Acres 2.20 Tax Acres Plat ROME PARK Lot 002 Block 001 Tax Description EXC: HWY R -O -W PARCEL 220B MNDOT R -O -W PLAT 10-10 Building Style Year Built Building Information Finished Sq Ft Other Garage N Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead 0112 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF N CREEK Assessor Information Bedrooms Bathrooms Green Acres Ag Preserve N N Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale (Payable 2014) (Payable 2015) Land $257,100.00 $257,100.00 Date of Sale 1126/2012 Building $385,600.00 $385,600.00 Sale Value $700,00000 Total $642,700.00 $642,700.00 Qualified/ U Unqualified Disdaimer This m ormatom is to be used for reference purposes only Carver County does not guava - ,iatenal contained herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disdaimer is pro uw pjrsoam w Munesota �j Statutes 466 03, Subd 21 (2000). and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims. and agrees to defend. indemnity, and hold harmless the County from any and all claims brought by User. CARVER its employees or agents. or third parties which apse out of the users access or use of data provided. COUNTY Monday, April 21, 2014 Carver County, MN Pape 1 of 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN • • P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 04/21/2014 1:24 PM Receipt No. 00249127 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Next Steps Learning Center Inc 1430 Park Court Chanhassen MN 55317 - Next Steps Learning Center Expansion Planning Case 2014-15 ------------------------------------------------------- Site Plan 530.00 Sign Rent 200.00 Recording Fees 50.00 GIS List 18.00 Total Cash Check 1202 Change 798.00 0.00 798.00 0.00 SCANNED 0 0 NEXT STEPS LEARNING CENTER EXPANSION - PLANNING CASE 2014-15 $530.00 Site Plan ($500+$30) $10 per 1,000 square feet $18.00 Property Owners List (13 x $3/address) $50.00 Recording Escrow $200.00 Notification Sign $798.00 TOTAL $798.00 Check 1202 from Next Steps Learning Center, Inc. i(iANKE 0 Property Card Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name SPAUDE HOLDINGS LLC Mailing Address 1430 PARK CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8901 Property Address Address 1430 PARK CT City CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 0 Parcel ID Number 257510020 Parcel Information Uses Commercial GIS Acres 2.20 Tax Acres Plat ROME PARK Lot 002 Block 001 Tax Description EXC: HWY R -O -W PARCEL 220B MNDOT R -O -W PLAT 10-10 Building Style Year Built Building Information Finished Sq Ft Other Garage N Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead 0112 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF N CREEK Assessor Information Bedrooms Bathrooms Green Acres Ag Preserve N N Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale (Payable 2014) (Payable 2015) Land $257,100.00 $257,100.00 Date of Sale 11/26/2012 Building $385,600.00 $385,600.00 Sale Value $700,000.00 Total $642,700.00 $642,700.00 Qualified/ U Unqualified AM Disclaimer: This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Carver County does not guarantee accuracy of the material containetl herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466.03, Sabo. 21 (2000), and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnity, and hold harmless the County from any and all claims brought by User, CARVER its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of date provided. COUNTY Monday, April 21, 2014 Carver County, MN Page 1 of 1 ITV; .1; Minnesota Department of Human Services Division of Licensing flli'r,Sr9 PO Box 64242 �.•• St. Paul, MN 55164-0242O W. ; .t, To report concerns about your child's care, contact DHS Licensing at: (651)431-6500 Special Terms: Licensed From Licensed To 01/01/2014 12/31/2014 License Number 1062747 -1 -CCC Laura Plummer Zrust, Deputy Inspector General, Licensing Division Lucinda E. Jesson, Commissioner Terms of License: Service Provided: Child Care Center - Day Time To provide services for children in child care centers, subject to the standards of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 245A and Minnesota Rules, parts 9503.0005 to 9503.0170. Capacity: 94 16 Infant % /p ,✓ 28 Toddlcr 50 Preschool/School Age Not To Exceed 5 School Age -Ta 1 v2I 1� rd/S, Open from January through December I K� Mon 6:45 AM - 6:00 PM Tue 6:45 AM - 6:00 PM Wed 6:45 AM - 6:00 PM Thu 6:45 AM - 6:00 PM Fri 6:45 AM - 6:00 PM clTv REWVM APR 18 2014 Doing Business At: IMAMAMpul#"DEPT Next Steps Learning Center Chanhassen Inc 1430 Park Court Chanhassen, MN 55317 Issued To Next Steps Learning Center Chanhassen Inc • Next Steps Learning Center 2440 Chaska Blvd Chaska, MN 55318 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 13= SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION CHECKLIST Per Chanhassen City Code Section 20-109 Prior to filing an application for site plan review, the applicant shall attend a conference with city staff. The application shall include the following: (1) Completed Application Form. (2) Evidence of ownership or an interest in the property. (3) Application fee (to be calculated as follows): Type Fee Calculation Administrative $100 $100 Residential Districts $500 plus $5 per dwelling unit $500 + ($5 x Commercial/Industrial Districts' Include number of adsting employees: �/ -2 $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square $500 + ($10 x _ O and numberoFrxwemployees: feet of building area Notification Sign $200 $200 Document Recording Escrow $50 $50, Property Owners' List within 500' of subject property $3 per address $3 x addresses= 1t t G (City to generate, fee determined at -application meeting) (4) rid a. Complete Site Plan, signed by a registered architect, civil engineer, landscape architect or other design professional, to include the following: 1. Name of project. 2. Name, address and telephone number of applicant, engineer, and owner of record. 3. Legal description (certificate of survey will be required). 4. Date proposed, north arrow, engineering scale, number of sheets, and name of drawer. 5. Vicinity map showing relationship of the proposed development to surrounding streets, rights-of-way, easements and natural features. 6. Description of intended use of the site, buildings and structures, including type of occupancy and estimated occupancy load. 7. Existing zoning and land use. '70FCiANMA& Et 8. Tabulation box indicating: RECEIVED a. Size of parcel in acres and square feet. b. Gross floor area of each building. APR 18 2014 c. Percent of site covered by building. d. Percent of site covered by impervious surface. r4y.W. lRp1lWNG.JFq e. Percent of site covered by parking area. f. Projected number of employees. g. Number of seats if intended use is a restaurant or place of assembly. h. Number of parking spaces required. i. Number of parking spaces provided including handicapped. j. Height of all buildings and structures and number of stories. c:k%Na E 0 STORMWATER REPORT FOR Next Steps Learning Center Expansion Chanhassen, MN February 12, 2014 REVISED March 23, 2014 Prepared For: Neat Steps Learning Center 1430 Park Ct. Chanhassen, MN 5317 Prepared By: Kalho Engineering Inc. 10775 Poppitz Lane Chaska, MN 55318 612-418-6828 Cin 0FCHAN.H. �& FECcl� , APR 18 2014 C4"l'-.98ENF MWNGfIFP' I hereby certify that this plan, report, or specification was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed en7er under the I off t ee State of Minnesota C 444"— �''"'—`LYcense No. 26909 Curtiss J. Kallio 0 0 STORMWATER CALCULATIONS Introduction This Stormwater Report provides a comparison of pre -development and post -development runoff for an expansion project at Next Steps Learning Center located at 1430 Park Ct. in Chanhassen, MN. Requirements As per an email from the City of Chanhassen Water Resource Coordinator dated February 27, 2014, runoff rates must not increase at any point on the subject property. The existing spillway down the slope to Riley Creek must also be stabilized. Existing Site The 2.2 acre site currently consists of a 7081 square feet building, 30,130 square feet of impervious surface, 27,560 square feet of wooded area, and 31,410 square feet of lawn and open space. The majority of this site drains directly to Riley Creek. Concentrated flows from the existing parking lot drain to an existing spillway to Riley Creek. From City Water Resource Coordinator correspondence, there are issues with the slopes downstream of the parking lot spillway. The majority of the soils on the site are Kilkenny -Lester loams. These soils are formed from glacial till on moraines. A hydrologic soil group C was used in the calculations. Proposed Improvements Proposed improvements to this site include a 3159 square feet addition and modifications to the existing parking lot. The net increase in impervious surface is 2841 square feet. MODELING RESULTS Peak Discharge Rates The pre -development and post -development runoff calculations and were performed using HydroCAD software which utilizes SCS TR -20 methodologies. All runoff calculations were performed using a Type 1124 -hour rainfall distribution with a 2 -year rainfall of 2.8 inches, a 10 -year rainfall of 4.2 inches, and a 100 -year rainfall of 6.0 inches. Curve numbers were taken from the table using their respective soil group. The basin areas with their respective impervious area, curve numbers, and time of concentration can be found in the HydroCAD results at the back of this report. 2 0 0 The pre -development and post -development runoff calculations are attached, but summarized below: Discharge 2 -Year Storm (cfs) 10 -Year Storm (cfs) 100 -Year Storm (cfs) Point Pre F Post Change Pre Post Change Pre _ Post Change Dl 1.26 1.32 0.06 2.63 2.59 -0.04 4.61 4.38 -0.23 D1.2 0.46 0.28 -0.16 0.73 0.34 -0.39 1.07 0.38 -0.69 D2 1.63 1.68 0.06 3.07 3.10 0.03 5.00 5.01 0.01 TOTAL 2.86 2.88 0.02 5.60 5.44 416 9.40 9.09 -0.31 Where: D 1 = Flow to Riley Creek through spillway and wooded slopes D 1.2 = Flow to spillway D2 = Flow to south through entrance and grassed areas As shown above, the post -development peak discharges are nearly equal to pre -development discharges for all storm events. Discharge Dl has a slight increase for the 2 -year storm event because of the difficulty of using a more restrictive pond outlet. The proposed 4" PVC outlet will already be prone to clogging and using a smaller outlet to meet the 2 -year existing storm criteria will be a maintenance issue. Discharge D l meets city criteria for the 10 -year and 100 -year storm events. Discharge D1.2 to the existing spillway is less than existing for all storm events, meeting city criteria. Discharge D2 has a slight increase for all storm events. This is because of the difficulty of getting more runoff into the proposed dry pond due to the existing and proposed grades. The overall Discharge D is slightly increased for the 2 -year storm, but less than existing for the 10 - year and 100 -year storm events. Downstream Assessment/Impacts Because the post development runoff is nearly equal to pre-develoment runoff, no adverse downstream impacts are anticipated. In addition, the post -development runoff to the spillway is significantly reduced for each storm event. The slopes downstream of the spillway will also be stabilized as discussed below. Spillway Slope Stabilization The slopes downstream of the existing spillway will be armored with Class II Hand Placed Riprap. The riprap section will be as shown in the attached detail. Emergency Overflow The dry pond emergency overflow is the low point in the drainage break in the parking lot. The 100 - year storm overflow is 0.18 cfs. 0 0 Attachments 1. 2 -yr, 10 -yr, and 100 -yr Pre -Development HydroCAD report 2. 2 -yr, 10 -yr, and 100 -yr Post -Development HydroCAD report 3. Parking Lot Plans and Details (Sheets 1 through 3) 4. Pre -Development Drainage Area Map 5. Post -Development Drainage Area Map 0 S1.1 S1.2 S1 RIL CREEK TOTAL DISCHARGE 0 BLDG SU xTO SPILLWAY Subcat Reach Aon JLInk J CS2� S2.1 [D72 ENTRY 0 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02095 © 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.10 hrs, 721 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentS1.1: S1.1 Runoff Area=42,531 sf 1.90% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.69" Flow Length=200' Tc=18.7 min CN=72 Runoff --0.67 cfs 0.056 of SubcatchmentS1.2: EX. BLDG Runoff Area=7,081 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.57" Flow Length=270' Tc=20.4 min CN=98 Runoff --0.41 cfs 0.035 of SubcatchmentSl.3: TO SPILLWAY Runoff Area=6,196 sf 83.59% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.16" Tc=7.0 min CN=94 Runoff=0.46 cfs 0.026 of SubcatchmentS2.1: 52.1 Runoff Area=40,330 sf 42.30% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.35" Flow Length=380' Tc=12.5 min CN=84 Runoff --11.63 cfs 0.104 of Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE Inflow=2.86 cfs 0.221 of Outflow=2.86 cfs 0.221 of Reach D1: RILEY CREEK Inflow=1.26 cfs 0.117 of Outflow=1.26 cfs 0.117 of Reach D2: ENTRY Inflow=1.63 cfs 0.104 of Outflow=1.63 cfs 0.104 of Total Runoff Area = 2.207 ac Runoff Volume = 0.221 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.20" 68.66% Pervious = 1.515 ac 31.34% Impervious = 0.692 ac 0 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 02013 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment S1.1: S1.1 Runoff = 0.67 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.056 af, Depth= 0.69" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (si) CN Description 17,472 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C ' 809 98 Walks _ 24,250 70 Woods, Good HSG C 42,531 72 Weighted Average 41,722 98.10% Pervious Area 809 Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 1.90% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 13.7 140 0.0200 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 5.0 60 0.3300 0.20 Sheet Flow, Woods: Liaht underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.80" 18.7 200 Total 0.4 0 0.35 11LL 0.1 Subcatchment S1.1: S1.1 Hydrograph 0.67 cfs Type II 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Runoff Area=42,531 sf Runoff Volume=0.056 of Runoff Depth=0.69" Flow Length=200' Tc=18.7 min CN=72 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 16 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hour) ❑ RunoB 1404 PreDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD@ 10.00 s/n 02095 @2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment S1.2: EX. BLDG Runoff = 0.41 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.035 af, Depth= 2.57" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (so CN Description 7,081 98 Paved parking HSG C 7,081 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 1.7 70 0.0050 0.69 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n=0.011 P2=2.80" 13.7 140 0.0200 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 5.0 60 0.3300 0.20 Sheet Flow, Woods: Liaht underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.80" 20.4 270 Total Subcatchment S1.2: EX. BLDG Hydrograph ❑ Runofl 0.4 Type II 24 -hr 0.38 0.36 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" 0.34 0.32 Runoff Area=7,081 sf 0.3 0.28 Runoff Volume=0.035 of 0.26 0.24 Runoff Depth=2.57" g 0.22 Y. 0.2 Flow Length=270' 018 0.,8 Tc=20.4 min 0.14 0.122 N=98 0.1 0.1 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 Time (hours) • 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2. 80 " Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 @2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Subcatchment S1.3: TO SPILLWAY [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.46 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.026 af, Depth= 2.16" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 5,179 98 Paved parking, HSG C 1,017 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 6,196 94 Weighted Average 1,017 16.41% Pervious Area 5,179 83.59% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S1.3: TO SPILLWAY Hydrograph ❑ RunoH 046 0. 44 Type II 24 -hr °o;" 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" 0.36 0.36 Runoff Area=6,196 sf 0.34 0.32 Runoff Volume=0.026 of 0.3 0.26 Runoff Depth=2.16" 3: 0.26- °02 Tc=7.0 min 0.222 02 0.16- CN=94 0.16 0.14 " 0.12 0.1 Time (hours) 9 • 1404 PreDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 H droCAD®10.00 s/n 02095 © 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment S2.1: S2.1 Runoff = 1.63 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.104 af, Depth= 1.35" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 19,959 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 17,061 98 Paved parking, HSG C 3,310 70 Woods Good HSG C 40,330 84 Weighted Average 23,269 0.16 57.70% Pervious Area 17,061 42.30% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.5 100 0.0200 0.16 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 1.3 100 0.0200 1.29 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.80" 0.7 180 0.0400 4.06 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 12.5 380 Total Subcatchment S2.1: S2.1 Hydrograph Time (hours) Type II 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Runoff Area=40,330 sf Runoff Volume=0.104 of Runoff Depth=1.35" Flow Length=380' Tc=12.5 min CN=84 ❑ Runoff 0 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type // 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.207 ac, 31.34% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.20" for 2 YR event Inflow = 2.86 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.221 of Outflow = 2.86 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.221 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE Hydrograph Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ outflow 0 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 H droCAD@ 10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Reach D1: RILEY CREEK [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.281 ac, 23.42% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.09" for 2 YR event Inflow = 1.26 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.117 of Outflow = 1.26 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.117 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Reach D1: RILEY CREEK Hydrograph Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Outflow 0 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type // 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD@ 10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HVdrOCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Reach D2: ENTRY [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.926 ac, 42.30% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.35' for 2 YR event Inflow = 1.63 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.104 of Outflow = 1.63 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.104 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Reach D2: ENTRY Hydrograph Time (hours) ❑ Infiow ❑ Outflow 0 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HVdroCAD010 00 s/n 02095 © 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.10 hrs, 721 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentS1.1: S1.1 Runoff Area=42,531 sf 1.90% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.60" Flow Length=200' Tc=18.7 min CN=72 Runoff --1.72 cfs 0.130 of SubcatchmentS1.2: EX. BLDG Runoff Area=7,081 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.96" Flow Length=270' Tc=20.4 min CN=98 Runoff --0.62 cfs 0.054 of SubcatchmentS1.3: TO SPILLWAY Runoff Area=6,196 sf 83.59% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.52" Tc=7.0 min CN=94 Runoff=0.73 cfs 0.042 of SubcatchmentS2.1: 52.1 Runoff Area=40,330 sf 42.30% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.55" Flow Length=380' Tc=12.5 min CN=84 Runoff=3.07 cfs 0.197 of Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE Inflow --5.60 cfs 0.422 of Outflow --5.60 cfs 0.422 of Reach D1: RILEY CREEK Inflow --2.63 cfs 0.226 of Outflow --2.63 cfs 0.226 of Reach D2: ENTRY Inflow --3.07 cfs 0.197 of Outflow --3.07 cfs 0.197 of Total Runoff Area = 2.207 ac Runoff Volume = 0.422 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.30" 68.66% Pervious= 1.515 ac 31.34% Impervious = 0.692 ac 0 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type // 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 @2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Summary for Subcatchment S1.1: S1.1 Runoff = 1.72 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.130 af, Depth= 1.60" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sfl CN Description 17,472 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C ' 809 98 Walks 24,250 70 Woods, Good, HSG C 42,531 72 Weighted Average 41,722 98.10% Pervious Area 809 Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 1.90% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 13.7 140 0.0200 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 5.0 60 0.3300 0.20 Sheet Flow, Woods: Liaht underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.80" 18.7 200 Total Subcatchment S1.1: S1.1 Hydrograph ❑ RunoH 1.72 cfs Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Runoff Area=42,531 sf Runoff Volume=0.130 of Runoff Depth=1.60" Flow Length=200' Tc=18.7 min CN=72 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) • 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD®10.00 s/n 02095 © 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Subcatchment S1.2: EX. BLDG Runoff = 0.62 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.054 af, Depth= 3.96" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (so CN Description 7,081 98 Paved parking HSG C 7,081 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.7 70 0.0050 0.69 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n=0.011 P2=2.80" 13.7 140 0.0200 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 5.0 60 0.3300 0.20 Sheet Flow, Woods: Liaht underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.80" 20.4 270 Total r LL 0., 0.62 cfs Subcatchment S1.2: EX. BLDG Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Runoff Area=7,081 sf Runoff Volume=0.054 of Runoff Depth=3.96" Flow Length=270' Tc=20.4 min CN=98 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) ❑ RunoR 0 r 1404 PreDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD®10.00 s/n 02095 © 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Summary for Subcatchment S1.3: TO SPILLWAY [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.73 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.042 af, Depth= 3.57' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Description 5,179 98 Paved parking, HSG C 1,017 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 6,196 94 Weighted Average 1,017 16.41 % Pervious Area 5,179 83.59% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, 0. 0.73 cfs Subcatchment S1.3: TO SPILLWAY Hydrograph Type 11 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Runoff Area=6,196 sf Runoff Volume=0.042 of Runoff Depth=3.52" Tc=7.0 min CN=94 12 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 Tim (hours) ❑ Runoff 0 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAIM10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Summary for Subcatchment S2.1: S2.1 Runoff = 3.07 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.197 af, Depth= 2.55' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Description 19,959 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 17,061 98 Paved parking, HSG C 3,310 70 Woods, Good HSG C 40,330 84 Weighted Average 23,269 57.70% Pervious Area 17,061 Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 42.30% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.5 100 0.0200 0.16 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 1.3 100 0.0200 1.29 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.80" 0.7 180 0.0400 4.06 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 12.5 380 Total Subcatchment S2.1: S2.1 Hydrograph ❑ RunoR 1 3.07 cfs I Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Runoff Area=40,330 sf Runoff Volume=0.197 of Runoff Depth=2.55" Flow Length=380' Tc=12.5 min CN=84 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 Time (hours) • E 1404 PreDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 H droCAD®10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 15 Summary for Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.207 ac, 31.34% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.30" for 10 YR event Inflow = 5.60 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.422 of Outflow = 5.60 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.422 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE Hydrograph Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Outflow 1404 PreDevelopment Prepared by Kallio Engin( 0 0 Type 11 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Printed 3/23/2014 Summary for Reach D1: RILEY CREEK [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.281 ac, 23.42% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.11" for 10 YR event Inflow = 2.63 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.226 of Outflow = 2.63 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.226 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Reach D1: RILEY CREEK Hydrograph Time (hours) FLI-1 ❑ Outflow 0 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 Summary for Reach D2: ENTRY [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow-- Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.926 ac, 42.30% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.55' for 10 YR event Inflow = 3.07 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.197 of Outflow = 3.07 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.197 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Reach D2: ENTRY 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) FO -1 n -flow ❑ OUMM 0 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD®10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HVdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.10 hrs, 721 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentS1.1: S1.1 Runoff Area=42,531 sf 1.90% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.99" Flow Length=200' Tc=18.7 min CN=72 Runoff --3.30 cfs 0.244 of SubcatchmentS1.2: EX. BLDG Runoff Area=7,081 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.76" Flow Length=270' Tc=20.4 min CN=98 Runoff --0.89 cfs 0.078 of SubcatchmentS1.3: TO SPILLWAY Runoff Area=6,196 sf 83.59% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.30" Tc=7.0 min CN=94 Runoff=1.07 cfs 0.063 of SubcatchmentS2.1: S2.1 Runoff Area=40,330 sf 42.30% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.20" Flow Length=380' Tc=12.5 min CN=84 Runoff --5.00 cfs 0.324 of Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE Inflow=9.40 cfs 0.708 of Outflow=9.40 cfs 0.708 of Reach D1: RILEY CREEK Inflow=4.61 cfs 0.384 of Outflow --4.61 cfs 0.384 of Reach D2: ENTRY Inflow=5.00 cfs 0.324 of Outflow --5.00 cfs 0.324 of Total Runoff Area = 2.207 ac Runoff Volume = 0.708 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.85" 68.66% Pervious = 1.515 ac 31.34% Impervious = 0.692 ac 0 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 © 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 19 Summary for Subcatchment S1.1: S1.1 Runoff = 3.30 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.244 af, Depth= 2.99" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Area (sl) CN Description 17,472 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C ' 809 98 Walks 24,250 70 Woods, Good HSG C 42,531 72 Weighted Average 41,722 98.10% Pervious Area 809 Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 1.90% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 13.7 140 0.0200 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 5.0 60 0.3300 0.20 Sheet Flow, Woods: Liaht underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.80" 18.7 200 Total Subcatchment S1.1: S1.1 Hydrograph ❑ Runoff 3.30 cfs Type II 24 -hr 3 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Runoff Area=42,531 sf Runoff Volume=0.244 of 2 -Runoff Depth=2.99" LL Flow Length=200' Tc=18.7 min CN=72 Time (hours) 1404 PreDevelopment Prepared by Kallio Engine HvdroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 0 Type 11 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Printed 3/23/2014 Summary for Subcatchment S1.2: EX. BLDG Runoff = 0.89 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.078 af, Depth= 5.76" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Area (sf) CN Description 7,081 98 Paved parking HSG C 7,081 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description min (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.7 70 0.0050 0.69 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n=0.011 P2=2.80" 13.7 140 0.0200 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 5.0 60 0.3300 0.20 Sheet Flow, Woods: Liaht underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.80" 20.4 270 Total Subcatchment S1.2: EX. BLDG Hydrograph v.na 0.89 cfs 0.9 0.65 Type II 24 -hr 0�8 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" 0.7 Runoff Area=7,081 sf 0.65 0.6 Runoff Volume=0.078 of °05 Runoff Depth=5.76" E 0.45 Flow Length=270' 0.4 0.35 Tc=20.4 min °' CN=98 0.1 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) ❑ RunoH 0 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD@ 10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Summary for Subcatchment S1.3: TO SPILLWAY [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 1.07 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.063 af, Depth= 5.30" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Area (sf) CN Description 5,179 98 Paved parking, HSG C 1,017 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 6,196 94 Weighted Average 1,017 16.41 % Pervious Area 5,179 83.59% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description min (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S1.3: TO SPILLWAY Hydrograph Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Runoff Area=6,196 sf Runoff Volume=0.063 of Runoff Depth=5.30" Tc=7.0 min CN=94 Time (hours) ❑ Runoff 0 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type// 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 02013 HVdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22 Summary for Subcatchment S2.1: S2.1 Runoff = 5.00 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.324 af, Depth= 4.20" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Area (sf) CN Description 19,959 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 17,061 98 Paved parking, HSG C 3,310 70 Woods Good HSG C 40,330 84 Weighted Average 23,269 57.70% Pervious Area 17,061 42.30% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description min (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.5 100 0.0200 0.16 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 1.3 100 0.0200 1.29 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.80" 0.7 180 0.0400 4.06 Shallow Concentrated Flow, 12.5 380 Total Subcatchment S2.1: S2.1 Hydrograph 5 ( Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" 41 1 1 1 Runoff Area=40,330 sf :MTSi&V4RTT-$11MIZIF-Ti 311 I] Runoff Depth=4.20" Flow Length=380' 21 1 1 1 Tc=12.5 min CN=84 12 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 50 Time (hours) D itunoR r 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 @2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23 Summary for Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.207 ac, 31.34% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.85' for 100 YR event Inflow = 9.40 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.708 of Outflow = 9.40 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.708 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE Hydrograph Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Outflow 0 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24 Summary for Reach D1: RILEY CREEK [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.281 ac, 23.42% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 3.60" for 100 YR event Inflow = 4.61 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.384 of Outflow = 4.61 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.384 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Reach 131: RILEY CREEK Hydrograph Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ OUtMM 0 1404 PreDevelopment Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall= 6. 00 " Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/23/2014 HydroCAD®10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25 Summary for Reach D2: ENTRY [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.926 ac, 42.30% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.20" for 100 YR event Inflow = 5.00 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.324 of Outflow = 5.00 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.324 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Reach D2: ENTRY Hydrograph Time (hours) ❑Inflow ❑ Out low 0 S1.4 S1.1 EX. BLDG S1.1 D1 � EY CREEK a� TOTAL DISCHARGE Subcat R� on I Link AD TION S1.2 PARKING P1 r SlNALE S2.1 p PARKING D2 14011107 • 0 1404 PostElevelopment Type// 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCADO10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 2 Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.10 hrs, 721 points x 2 Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentS1.1: S1.1 Runoff Area=40.231 sf 1.13% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.69" Flow Length=200' Tc=18.7 min CN=72 Runoff --0.64 cfs 0.053 of SubcatchmentS1.2: PARKING Runoff Area=6,364 sf 54.23% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.57" Tc=7.0 min CN=87 Runoff --0.36 cfs 0.019 of SubcatchmentSl.3: ADDITION Runoff Area=3,159 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.57" Tc=7.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.26 cfs 0.016 of SubcatchmentS1.4: EX. BLDG Runoff Area=7,081 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.57" Flow Length=270' Tc=20.4 min CN=98 Runoff --0.41 cfs 0.035 of SubcatchmentS2.1: PARKING Runoff Area=39.306 sf 47.90% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.42" Flow Length=380' Tc=12.5 min CN=85 Runoff --1.68 cfs 0.107 of Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE Inflow --2.88 cfs 0.230 of Outflow --2.88 cfs 0.230 of Reach D7: RILEY CREEK Inflow=1.32 cfs 0.123 of Outflow=1.32 cfs 0.123 of Reach D2: ENTRY Inflow=1.68 cfs 0.107 of Outflow --1.68 cfs 0.107 of Pond P1: SWALE Peak Elev=949.87' Storage=270 cf Inflow --0.62 cfs 0.035 of Primary=0.28 cfs 0.035 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.28 cfs 0.035 of Total Runoff Area = 2.207 ac Runoff Volume = 0.230 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.25" 65.70% Pervious = 1.450 ac 34.30% Impervious = 0.757 ac 0 0 1404 PosWevelopment Type 1l 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD®10.00 s/n 02095 © 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment S1.1: S1.1 Runoff = 0.64 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Depth= 0.69" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 15,527 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 24,250 70 Woods, Good, HSG C 454 98 Walks 40,231 72 Weighted Average 39,777 98.87% Pervious Area 454 1.13% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 13.7 140 0.0200 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 5.0 60 0.3300 0.20 Sheet Flow, Woods: Liaht underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.80" 18.7 200 Total Subcatchment S1.1: S1.1 Hydrograph 0.64 cfs 0.65 06 Type II 24 -hr 0.55 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" 0.5 Runoff Area=40,231 sf 0.45- Runoff Volume=0.053 of °` Runoff Depth=0.69" 0.35 03- Flow Length=200' 0.25 Tc=18.7 min 0.2 CN=72 °.1 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) ❑ Runofl 0 • 1404 Postl3evelopment Type 1124 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD®10.00 s/n 02095 @2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment S1.2: PARKING [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.36 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.019 af, Depth= 1.57' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 3,451 98 Paved parking & roofs 2,913 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 6,364 87 Weighted Average 2,913 45.77% Pervious Area 3,451 54.23% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S1.2: PARKING Hydrograph 016 Type II 24 -hr 0.o. 2 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" 028 Runoff Area=6,364 sf 0.28 Runoff Volume=0.019 of 024 0.22 Runoff Depth=1.57" O. LL 0.,8 Tc=7.0 min 0'6 0.14 CN=87 0., Time (hours) ❑ Runoff 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD@ 10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Subcatchment S1.3: ADDITION [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.26 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.016 af, Depth= 2.57' Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 3,159 98 Paved parking & roofs 3,159 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _(min) (feet) (fVft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S1.3: ADDITION Hydrograph ❑ RunoR U.M Type II 24 -hr 0.24- 0.22- .24°22 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" 0.2 Runoff Area=3,159 sf 0.18Runoff Volume=0.016 of 018 Runoff Depth=2.57r' 30 0.12 0.14 Tc=7.0 min a °., CN=98 Time (hours) 0 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type // 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 @2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment S1.4: EX. BLDG Runoff = 0.41 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.035 af, Depth= 2.57" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 7,081 98 Paved parking 8 roofs 7,081 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.7 70 0.0050 0.69 Sheet Flow, Tc=20.4 min 014 0.12 CN=98 0.1- Smooth surfaces n=0.011 P2=2.80" 13.7 140 0.0200 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 5.0 60 0.3300 0.20 Sheet Flow, Woods: Liaht underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.80" 20.4 270 Total Subcatchment S1.4: EX. BLDG Hydrograph -17 0.42-0.4 cfs 04 Type II 24 -hr 0.36 0.36 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" 0.34- 0.32- Runoff Area=7,081 sf 0.3 0.28- Runoff Volume=0.035 of m 0.26 0.24 Runoff Depth=2.57" 0.227 LL 0.2 Flow Length=270' 0.16 0."' Tc=20.4 min 014 0.12 CN=98 0.1- 2 4 6 8 10 12 Time (hours) 42 44 46 48 ❑ RunaH 0 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD@ 10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment S2.1: PARKING Runoff = 1.68 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.107 af, Depth= 1.42" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Area (sf) CN Description 17,168 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 18,828 98 Paved parking & roofs 3,310 70 Woods, Good HSG C 39,306 85 Weighted Average 20,478 0.16 52.10% Pervious Area 18,828 47.90% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.5 100 0.0200 0.16 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 1.3 100 0.0200 1.29 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n=0.011 P2=2.80" 0.7 180 0.0400 4.06 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 12.5 380 Total 11.68 cfs I Subcatchment S2.1: PARKING Type II 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Runoff Area=39,306 sf Runoff Volume=0.107 of Runoff Depth=1.42" Flow Length=380' Tc=12.5 min 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 Time (hours( CN=85 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 71 ❑ RunoR 0 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 H drOCAD® 10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydrOCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.207 ac, 34.30% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.25' for 2 YR event Inflow = 2.88 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.230 of Outflow = 2.88 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.230 af, Aften= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs / 2 Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE Hydrograph Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Outflow 0 0 1404 PosWevelopment Type // 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydrOCAD010.00 s/n 02095 @2013 HVdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Reach D1: RILEY CREEK [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.305 ac, 24.89% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.13" for 2 YR event Inflow = 1.32 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.123 of Outflow = 1.32 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.123 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs / 2 Reach D1: RILEY CREEK Hydrograph Time (hours( ❑ Inflow ❑ OuNlow n u 1404 PostDevelopment Prepared by Kallio Enginee 0 Type 1l 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Printed 3/24/2014 Summary for Reach D2: ENTRY [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.902 ac, 47.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.42" for 2 YR event Inflow = 1.68 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.107 of Outflow = 1.68 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.107 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs 12 Reach D2: ENTRY Hydrograph Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ OUMOW 1404 PostDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydrOCAD010.00 s/n 02095 @2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Summary for Pond P1: SWALE Inflow Area = 0.219 ac, 69.41% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.90" for 2 YR event Inflow = 0.62 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.035 of Outflow = 0.28 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.035 af, Atten= 55%, Lag= 8.4 min Primary = 0.28 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.035 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 949.87' @ 12.12 hrs Surf.Area= 663 sf Storage= 270 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 5.3 min calculated for 0.035 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 5.3 min ( 798.1 - 792.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 949.00' 1,153 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq -ft) (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -fl) 949.00 0 0.0 0 0 0 949.50 418 122.0 70 70 1,185 950.00 757 198.0 290 359 3,122 950.50 2,600 341.0 793 1,153 9,257 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 949.00' 4.0" Round Culvert L= 12.0' CPP, projecting, no headwall, Ke= 0.900 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 949.00'/ 948.90' S= 0.0083'P Cc= 0.900 n=0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.09 sf #2 Secondary 950.40' Custom Weir/Orifice, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 0.20 Width (feet) 1.00 50.00 rimary OutFlow Max=0.28 cfs @ 12.12 hrs HW=949.86' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.28 cfs @ 3.17 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=949.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 2=Custom Weir/Orifice ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 0 0 1404 PosWevelopment Type 1124 -hr 2 YR Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD®10 00 s/n 02095 © 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 k=-, aliilWN-1111y Hydrograph 0.62 cfs ❑Inflow Outflow Inflow Area=0.219 ac ® Se oandary 0.65 Peak Elev=949.87' 0.6 0.55 Storage=270 cf 0.5 0.45 m 0.4 _..._._ ._. uqFt 3 0.35 0.28 cfs W 0.3 0.75 510. 0.00 ds Time (hours) Ll 0 1404 PostClevelopment Type // 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 @2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.10 hrs, 721 points x 2 Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentSl.1: S1.1 Runoff Area=40.231 sf 1.13% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.60" Flow Length=200' Tc=18.7 min CN=72 Runoff --1.63 cfs 0.123 of SubcatchmentS1.2: PARKING Runoff Area=6,364 sf 54.23% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.82" Tc --7.0 min CN=87 Runoff --0.64 cfs 0.034 of SubcatchmentS1.3: ADDITION Runoff Area=3,159 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.96" Tc=7.0 min CN=98 Runoff --0.39 cfs 0.024 of SubcatchmentS1.4: EX. BLDG Runoff Area=7,081 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.96" Flow Length=270' Tc=20.4 min CN=98 Runoff --0.62 cfs 0.054 of SubcatchmentS2.1: PARKING Runoff Area=39.306 sf 47.90% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.64" Flow Length=380' Tc=12.5 min CN=85 Runoff=3.10 cfs 0.198 of Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE Inflow --5.44 cfs 0.434 of Outflow --5.44 cfs 0.434 of Reach D1: RILEY CREEK Inflow --2.59 cfs 0.235 of Outflow --2.59 cfs 0.235 of Reach D2: ENTRY Inflow=3.10 cfs 0.198 of Outflow=3.10 cfs 0.198 of Pond P1: SWALE Peak Elev=950.22' Storage=603 cf Inflow --1.03 cfs 0.058 of Primary=0.34 cfs 0.058 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.34 cfs 0.058 of Total Runoff Area = 2.207 ac Runoff Volume = 0.434 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.36" 65.70% Pervious = 1.450 ac 34.30% Impervious = 0.757 ac 0 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD®10.00 s/n 02095 © 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Summary for Subcatchment S1.1: S1.1 Runoff = 1.63 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.123 af, Depth= 1.60" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Descriotion 15,527 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 24,250 70 Woods, Good, HSG C 454 98 Walks 40,231 72 Weighted Average 39,777 0.17 98.87% Pervious Area 454 1.13% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 13.7 140 0.0200 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 5.0 60 0.3300 0.20 Sheet Flow, Woods: Liaht underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.80" 18.7 200 Total 1 1.63 cfs I Subcatchment S1.1: S1.1 Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Runoff Area=40,231 sf Runoff Volume=0.123 of Runoff Depth=1.60" Flow Length=200' Tc=18.7 min CN=72 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) ❑ RunoR 0 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Summary for Subcatchment S1.2: PARKING [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.64 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.034 af, Depth= 2.82" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Description 3,451 98 Paved parking & roofs 2,913 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 6,364 87 Weighted Average 2,913 45.77% Pervious Area 3,451 54.23% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, 0.25 0.1 0.64 cfs Subcatchment S1.2: PARKING Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Runoff Area=6,364 sf Runoff Volume=0.034 of Runoff Depth=2.82" Tc=7.0 min CN=87 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 Time (hours) ❑ RUnoR i 1404 PostDevelopment Prepared by Kallio Enginee HvdroCAD®10.00 s/n 02095 4 • Type 11 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Printed 3/24/2014 Summary for Subcatchment S1.3: ADDITION [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.39 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.024 af, Depth= 3.96" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sfl CN Description 3,159 98 Paved parking & roofs 3,159 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S1.3: ADDITION Hydrograph ❑ aunoa o.< 0.39 cfs 0.38 Type II 24 -hr 0.36 0.34 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" 6.32 0.3 Runoff Area=3,159 sf 0.26 0.26 Runoff Volume=0.024 of 014 Runoff Depth=3.96" 012 1 ° 02 Tc=7.0 min LL 6.16 0.16 CN=98 0.14 0.12 °1 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 fit 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) • 1404 PostDevelopment Type// 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 @2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Summary for Subcatchment S1.4: EX. BLDG Runoff = 0.62 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.054 af, Depth= 3.96" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN Description 7,081 98 Paved parking & roofs 7,081 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fUft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.7 70 0.0050 0.69 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n=0.011 P2=2.80" 13.7 140 0.0200 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 5.0 60 0.3300 0.20 Sheet Flow, Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.80" 20.4 270 Total Subcatchment S1.4: EX. BLDG ❑ Runoff 0.62 cfs Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Runoff Area=7,081 sf Runoff Volume=0.054 of Runoff Depth=3.96" Flow Length=270' Tc=20.4 min CN=98 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) 0 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 H droCAD®10.00 s/n 02095 @2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Summary for Subcatchment S2.1: PARKING Runoff = 3.10 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.198 af, Depth= 2.64" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Area (sf) CN 17,168 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 18,828 98 Paved parking & roofs 3,310 70 Woods, Good HSG C 39,306 85 Weighted Average 20,478 0.16 52.10% Pervious Area 18,828 47.90% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.5 100 0.0200 0.16 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 1.3 100 0.0200 1.29 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n=0.011 P2=2.80" 0.7 180 0.0400 4.06 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fos 12.5 380 Total Subcatchment S2.1: PARKING Hydrograph ❑ RunoR 3 Type II 24 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Runoff Area=39,306 sf Runoff Volume=0.198 of 2- Runoff Depth=2.64" Flow Length=380' Tc=12.5 min CN=85 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 41 Time (hours) 0 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD@ 10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 Summary for Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.207 ac, 34.30% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 2.36" for 10 YR event Inflow = 5.44 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.434 of Outflow = 5.44 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.434 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs / 2 Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE Hydrograph Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ outflow 0 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Summary for Reach D1: RILEY CREEK [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.305 ac, 24.89% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.16" for 10 YR event Inflow = 2.59 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.235 of Outflow = 2.59 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.235 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs / 2 Reach D7: RILEY CREEK Hydrograph Time (hours) EIInflow D Outflow 0 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Summary for Reach D2: ENTRY [401 Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.902 ac, 47.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.64" for 10 YR event Inflow = 3.10 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.198 of Outflow = 3.10 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.198 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs 12 Reach D2: ENTRY Hydrograph Time (hours) Fffhnft—m--� ❑ Outflow 0 0 1404 Postl3evelopment Type 1124 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD®10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22 Summary for Pond P1: SWALE Inflow Area = 0.219 ac, 69.41% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.20" for 10 YR event Inflow = 1.03 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.058 of Outflow = 0.34 cfs @ 12.14 his, Volume= 0.058 af, Atten= 67%, Lag= 10.0 min Primary = 0.34 cfs @ 12.14 his, Volume= 0.058 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 950.22' @ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 1,448 sf Storage= 603 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 9.9 min calculated for 0.058 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 9.9 min ( 791.9 - 782.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 949.00' 1,153 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq -ft) (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -ft) 949.00 0 0.0 0 0 0 949.50 418 122.0 70 70 1,185 950.00 757 198.0 290 359 3,122 950.50 2,600 341.0 793 1,153 9,257 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 949.00' 4.0" Round Culvert L= 12.0' CPP, projecting, no headwall, Ke= 0.900 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 949.00'/ 948.90' S= 0.0083 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.09 sf #2 Secondary 950.40' Custom Weir/Orifice, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 0.20 Width (feet) 1.00 50.00 rimary OutFlow Max=0.34 cfs @ 12.14 his HW=950.21' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.34 cfs @ 3.88 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=949.00' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 2=Custom Weir/Orifice ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 0 1404 PostDevelopment Prepared by Kallio Enainei Pond P1: SWALE Hydrograph 0 Type 1124 -hr 10 YR Rainfall=4.20" Printed 3/24/2014 Inflow 1.03 cfs I outflow Inflow Area=0.219 ac ® Secondary Peak Elev=950.22' Storage=603 cf Fu 3 0 0.00 cfs Time (hours) E 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type // 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD®10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 24 Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.10 hrs, 721 points x 2 Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method SubcatchmentS1.1: S1.1 Runoff Area=40.231 sf 1.13% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.99" Flow Length=200' Tc=18.7 min CN=72 Runoff --3.12 cfs 0.230 of SubcatchmentS1.2: PARKING Runoff Area=6,364 sf 54.23% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.52" Tc=7.0 min CN=87 Runoff=1.00 cfs 0.055 of SubcatchmentSl.3: ADDITION Runoff Area=3,159 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.76" Tc=7.0 min CN=98 Runoff --0.56 cfs 0.035 of SubcatchmentS1.4: EX. BLDG Runoff Area=7,081 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.76" Flow Length=270' Tc=20.4 min CN=98 Runoff --0.89 cfs 0.078 of SubcatchmentS2.1: PARKING Runoff Area=39.306 sf 47.90% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.30" Flow Length=380' Tc=12.5 min CN=85 Runoff --4.97 cfs 0.324 of Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE Inflow=9.09 cfs 0.722 of Outflow --9.09 cfs 0.722 of Reach 101: RILEY CREEK Inflow=4.38 cfs 0.396 of Outflow --4.38 cfs 0.396 of Reach D2: ENTRY Inflow --5.01 cfs 0.326 of Outflow --5.01 cfs 0.326 of Pond P1: SWALE Peak Elev=950.46' Storage=1,043 cf Inflow --1.56 cfs 0.090 of Primary=0.38 cfs 0.087 of Secondary=0.18 cfs 0.002 of Outflow --0.55 cfs 0.090 of Total Runoff Area = 2.207 ac Runoff Volume = 0.722 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.92" 65.70% Pervious = 1.450 ac 34.30% Impervious = 0.757 ac 0 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HvdroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paas 25 Summary for Subcatchment S1.1: S1.1 Runoff = 3.12 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.230 af, Depth= 2.99" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Area (sf) CN Description 15,527 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 24,250 70 Woods, Good, HSG C 454 98 Walks 40,231 72 Weighted Average 39,777 98.87% Pervious Area 454 1.13% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 13.7 140 0.0200 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 5.0 60 0.3300 0.20 Sheet Flow, Woods: Liaht underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.80" 18.7 200 Total Subcatchment S1.1: S1.1 Hydrograph ❑ RunoR 3 Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Runoff Area=40,231 sf .Z 1 1111&MO _ ",M -11"1111117i 2� Runoff Depth=2.99" LL Flow Lenath=200' 1 I I A Tc=18.7 min 11 1 1 A CN=72 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Time (hours) 1404 PostDevelc Prepared by Kallio r� u 0 Type 11 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Printed 3/24/2014 Summary for Subcatchment S1.2: PARKING [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 1.00 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.055 af, Depth= 4.52" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Area (sf) CN Description 3,451 98 Paved parking & roofs 2,913 74 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG C 6,364 87 Weighted Average 2,913 45.77% Pervious Area 3,451 54.23% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S1.2: PARKING Hydrograph ❑ Runoff 11 1 Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Runoff Area=6,364 sf Runoff Volume=0.055 of { I Runoff Depth=4.52'r Tc=7.0 min CN=87 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 Time (hour) i 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD@ 10.00 s/n 02095 @2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27 Summary for Subcatchment S1.3: ADDITION [49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt Runoff = 0.56 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.035 at, Depth= 5.76" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Area (sf) CN Description 3,159 98 Paved parking & roofs 3,159 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f /ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment S1.3: ADDITION Hydrograph ❑ Runoft 0.56 cfs 0.55 Type II 24 -hr 0.5 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" 0.45 Runoff Area=3,159 sf 0.4 Runoff Volume=0.035 of 035 Runoff Depth=5.76" ° 03 Tc=7.0 min LL 025 CN=98 0 2 4 6 8 to 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 Time (hours) 0 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type// 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 28 Summary for Subcatchment S1.4: EX. BLDG Runoff = 0.89 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.078 af, Depth= 5.76" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Area (sfl CN Description 7,081 98 Paved parking & roofs 7,081 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.7 70 0.0050 0.69 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n=0.011 P2=2.80" 13.7 140 0.0200 0.17 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 5.0 60 0.3300 0.20 Sheet Flow, Woods: Liaht underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 2.80" 20.4 270 Total Subcatchment S1.4: EX. BLDG Hydrograph ❑ Runoff u.VO 0.89 cfs 085 Type II 24 -hr 0.8 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" 0.75 0.7 Runoff Area=7,081 sf 0.65 0.6 Runoff Volume=0.078 of °05 Runoff Depth=5.76" LL 0.45 Flow Length=270' 0.4 0.35 Tc=20.4 min 03 CN=98 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 Time (hours) 0 0 1404 PostDevelopment Type 1124 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 02013 HVdroGAD Software Solutions LLC Page 29 Summary for Subcatchment S2.1: PARKING Runoff = 4.97 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.324 af, Depth= 4.30" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Area (sf) CN Description 17,168 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 18,828 98 Paved parking & roofs 3,310 70 Woods, Good HSG C 39,306 85 Weighted Average 20,478 52.10% Pervious Area 18,828 Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 47.90% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.5 100 0.0200 0.16 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n=0.150 P2=2.80" 1.3 100 0.0200 1.29 Sheet Flow, Smooth surfaces n=0.011 P2=2.80" 0.7 180 0.0400 4.06 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fos 12.5 380 Total 4.97 cfs Subcatchment S2.1: PARKING Hydrograph Time (hours) Type II 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Runoff Area=39,306 sf Runoff Volume=0.324 of Runoff Depth=4.30" Flow Length=380' Tc=12.5 min CN=85 64 ❑ Runoff 1404 PostDevelol Prepared by Kallio I HvdroCAD® 10.00 s/n Type 11 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Printed 3/24/2014 Summary for Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.207 ac, 34.30% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.92" for 100 YR event Inflow = 9.09 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.722 of Outflow = 9.09 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.722 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs / 2 Reach D: TOTAL DISCHARGE Hydrograph Time (hour) o Inflow ❑ Outflow 0 0 1404 PosWevelopment Type 1124 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydrOCAD010.00 s/n 02095 @2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 31 Summary for Reach D1: RILEY CREEK [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.305 ac, 24.89% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.64" for 100 YR event Inflow = 4.38 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.396 of Outflow = 4.38 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.396 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs / 2 Reach D1: RILEY CREEK Hydrograph Time (hours) FO -1 n—fl M ❑ Outflow 0 E 1404 PostClevelopment Type 1124 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 32 Summary for Reach D2: ENTRY [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.902 ac, 47.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.33" for 100 YR event Inflow = 5.01 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.326 of Outflow = 5.01 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.326 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs / 2 Reach D2: ENTRY Hydrograph Time (hours) ❑ Inflow ❑ Out= 0 0 1404 PostElevelopment Type Il 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD@ 10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 33 Summary for Pond P1: SWALE Inflow Area = 0.219 ac, 69.41% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.93" for 100 YR event Inflow = 1.56 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.090 of Outflow = 0.55 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.090 af, Atten= 64%, Lag= 9.0 min Primary = 0.38 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.087 of Secondary = 0.18 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.002 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.10 hrs / 2 Peak Elev= 950.46' @ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 2,395 sf Storage= 1,043 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 15.1 min calculated for 0.090 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 15.0 min ( 787.9 - 772.8 ) _Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 949.00' 1,153 cf Custom Stage Data (Irregular)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq -ft) (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -ft) 949.00 0 0.0 0 0 0 949.50 418 122.0 70 70 1,185 950.00 757 198.0 290 359 3,122 950.50 2,600 341.0 793 1,153 9,257 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 949.00' 4.0" Round Culvert L= 12.0' CPP, projecting, no headwall, Ke= 0.900 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 949.00'/ 948.90' S= 0.0083 'P Cc= 0.900 n=0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.09 sf #2 Secondary 950.40' Custom Weir/Orifice, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 0.20 Width (feet) 1.00 50.00 Primary OutFlow Max=0.37 cfs @ 12.14 hrs HW=950.44' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) t1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.37 cfs @ 4.29 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.15 cfs @ 12.12 hrs HW=950.44' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 2=Custom Weir/Orifice (Weir Controls 0.15 cfs @ 0.57 fps) 1404 PostDevelopment Type 11 24 -hr 100 YR Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by Kallio Engineering Printed 3/24/2014 HydroCAD0 10.00 s/n 02095 02013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 34 Pond P1: SWALE Hydrograph 0 Inflow 1.56 CfS o outflow rna Inflow Area=0.219 ac ®Se ondary Peak Elev=950.46' Storage=1,043 cf $ 0.55 cfs 1 0.38 cfs H 24 2828 30 32 34 38 38 40 Time (hour) I HVAC SCREENING CITY OF CHANHAWEr RECEIVED APR I n 2U14 We propose painting the new units to match the existing structure so that the units will blend in with the building. Our building is blocked by existing buildings and trees for a good % of traffic volume on HWY 5 limiting line of sight of our rooftops. We feel that matching the paint color of the building will keep a cleaner look then other options available. �AK,.pWPV�d4LL L1 0 Gln 0FCHANHAS3EP RECENE0 APR 1 M 2014 TRASH ENCLOSURE ryarlr+: SSF0 PLANNING i)i:�'1 EXSISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE LOCATED ON NE CORNER OF LOT ON NORTH END OF PARKINGLOT. VIEW IS FROM NE LOOKING SW. Ll i Painting Finish and Windows CAT%' OFCHANHAS3E� RECEIVED APR 18 2014 r 44 f!HF' V (,, P)p-NINO i 1Fvi PICTURE FROM DISTANCE TO SHOW BOTH WINDOWS AND FINISH PAINT/TYPE OF MATERIAL C, J ,X� OFO ANHASuEt' RECEIVED APR 18 2014 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS �7r,r+, P�an�iha F ROUGHFACED CINDERBLOCK CONSTRUCTION PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING SCANNED WINDOWS CITY OFCHANHASOEf RECEIVED APR 18 2U14 r.HApIHP%, EPIPLOININDOFGT WINDOWS WILL MATCH EXISTING ALLUMINUM TYPE BLACK 0 0