The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-20_2018-20 3790 LONE CEDAR LANEThomas J. Campbell* Roger N. Knutson Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. jammik Andrea McDowell Poehler Soren M. Mattick Henry A. Schaeffer, III Alina Schwartz Shama N. Conklin Amy B. Schutt James J. Monge', III Jerome M. Porter David S. Kendall Matthew K. Brokl Kurt S. Fischer *Qf Counsel Grand Oak Office Center 1 860 Blue Gentian Road Suite 290 EaEan, Minnesota 55121 Main: 651-432-5000 Fax: 651-2 4-6237 www.ck-lawcom CAMPBELL KNUTSON February 4, 2019 Ms. Jean Steckling City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Miscellaneous Recordings Dear Ms. Steckling: Please find enclosed, for the City's files, the following documents which have been recorded with Carver County: Mortgage Holder Consent to Grant of Permanent Easement for Public Trail Purposes and Encroachment Agreement from MERS. This document was recorded on January 22, 2018 as document number A672725 and relates to the encroachment agreement for trail purposes from David and Deborah Guido. Release of Part of Mortgaged Premises from Dollar Bank, Federal Savings Bank. This document was recorded on December 28, 2018 as document number A671998 and relates to the Warranty Deed from Craig Norby and Janie Norby to Jeremy Langevin and Amy Langevin, which deed was recorded on December 28, 2018 as document number A671999. These two documents were recorded as part of a Lot Combination transaction. Variance 2018-20 was recorded on December 19, 2018 as document number A671654. 4. Warranty Deed from Michael and Katherine Slavics to Richard Anderson. This document was recorded on December 20, 2018 as document number A671714 and was part of a Lot Combination transaction. Thank you. Very truly yours, CITY DRECENED SSEN CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Fcg 0 7 2019 CHAN�oEN PLANNING DEPT Jean lson, Leg ssistant /jmo, Enclosures 200786v1 • 0 Document #: A671654 Date: 12-19-2018 Time: 02:34 PM Pages: 3 Recording Fee: $46.00 Paid on 12-19-2018 County: Carver State: MN Requesting Party: CAMPBELL IOJUTSON PA Kaaren Lewis County Recorder 0 • CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2018-20 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 13 -foot front yard setback and a 4 -foot shoreland setback variance. 2. Property. The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Crest. 3. Conditions. The variance approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. Parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be combined. 3. The drainage and utility easement between parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be vacated. 4. The applicant shall include all trees 6" dbh and larger within the construction limits for the accessory building and note trees to be removed. All preserved trees must be protected during construction. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse. Dated:.,Deceniber 4, 2018 CITY OF CHANHASSEN ,......,.n...... BY: AAA1 =(S* m s y Lauf burger, M6yor 69 ` v. ' AND: r.v HSS' i Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE(WMINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument wag aclmowledged before me this !_flay of 2018 by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 2 NOTARY UBL '" KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public -Minnesota o, My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2020 !018 • p` a-X18"�" CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Community for Life- Providing for Today and Planning forTomorrow Richard Morris 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Chaska, MN 55318 Re: Variance — Detached Garage Dear Mr. Moms: This letter is to formally notify you that on December 4, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission voted to approve the following motion: "The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 13 -foot front yard setback and a 4 -foot shoreland setback variance, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." The conditions of the variance are as follows: I. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. Parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be combined. 3. The drainage and utility easement between parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be vacated. 4. The applicant shall include all trees 6" dbh and larger within the construction limits for the accessory building and note trees to be removed. All preserved trees must be protected during construction. The variance is valid for one year from the approval date. The conditions placed on the variance must be met by December 4, 2019. If you have any questions, please contact me at 952-227-1132 or mwaltersCaci.chanhassen.nm us. Sincerely, 7Adlllw' , 4 i_� MacKenzie Walters Assistant Planner Encl. SCANNED c: Building File G- PLANQ018 Planning CasesI8-20 3790 Lnnc Cedar Lane Sub VvApproval Lata I8-20Am PH 952.227.1100 •WWW.CI.ChanhassBn.mn.us • FX 952.227.1130 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (APPROVAL) IN RE: The application of Richard Morris for the construction of a detached garage on a property zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF) — Planning Case 2018-20. On December 4, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Crest 4. Variance Findinas —Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The intent of the city's shoreland and wetland ordinances is to minimize the impact of development upon the city's water resources. The applicant's proposal to combine the undeveloped lot of record with a parcel that has an existing single-family home will remove the potential for a new single-family home to be constructed on the vacant lot. A new single-family home would entail the creation of significantly more impervious surface and require a larger shoreland setback variance than the proposed use, as well as a wetland setback variance that the proposed use does not require. Granting the requested shoreland variance to accommodate the construction of a detached garage that will result in the less intensive use of a riparian lot is in harmony with the intent of this Chapter. 0 0 The intent of the city's required front yard setback is to ensure adequate driveway length to accommodate off street parking, and to create a uniform aesthetic within residential areas by ensuring the presence of a minimum amount of front yard greenspace. In this instance, the parcel in question has an existing driveway that provides adequate off-street parking and is located at the end of a dead-end with no potential to negatively impact the neighbors' viewscape. Furthermore, the requested reduction in the front yard setback will reduce the need for a wetland setback variance and will significantly reduce the size of the requested shoreland setback variance. In this case, increasing the structure's distance from the lake is more important than increasing its distance from the public right of way. For the above reasons, the requested front yard setback variance is in harmony with the intent of this Chapter. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. 'Practical difficulties" as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The shoreland, wetland, and front yard setbacks leave the parcel with a very constrained triangular building area, and relief from one or more setbacks would be required for most potential uses of the property. The applicant's proposed use of the parcel to accommodate an accessory structure is reasonable and is significantly less intensive than other potential reasonable uses for the property, i.e. a single-family home, and requires significantly smaller variances. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The property is a lot of a record and was platted before the city's zoning, wetland, and shoreland ordinances were adopted. The lot does not meet current standards and the non -conforming nature of the lot has created the restricted buildable area that necessitates the requested variances. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The size and scale of the proposed detached garage is permitted by the Property's zoning district. Additionally, the location of the parcel at the end of a dead-end street on the far side of the property from the only neighboring residence means that granting the requested variance should not have any impact on the essential character of the neighborhood. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2018-20, dated December 4, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters, is incorporated herein. DECISION "The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 13 -foot front yard setback and a 4 -foot shoreland setback variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. Parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be combined. 3. The drainage and utility easement between parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be vacated. 4. The applicant shall include all trees 6" dbh and larger within the construction limits for the accessory building and note trees to be removed. All preserved trees must be protected during construction. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 4th day of December, 2018. CITY OF CHANHASSEN s BY - Chairman Chairman a i CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2018-20 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 13 -foot front yard setback and a 4 -foot shoreland setback variance. 2. Property. The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County. Minnesota, and legally described as lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Crest. 3. Conditions. The variance approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. Parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be combined. 3. The drainage and utility easement between parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be vacated. 4. The applicant shall include all trees 6" dbh and larger within the construction limits for the accessory building and note trees to be removed. All preserved trees must be protected during construction. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse. 0 Dated: December 4. 2018 (SEAL) AND: 10 CITY OF CRANHASSEN Todd Gerhank City STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this L day of $ 1P1Y1.U� 2018 by Denny Laufenburger. Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. NOTAR DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 }} K=MESSEN t't E 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (APPROVAL) IN RE: The application of Richard Moms for the construction of a detached garage on a property zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF) — Planning Case 2018-20. On December 4, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Crest 4. Variance Findings —Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The intent of the city's shoreland and wetland ordinances is to minimize the impact of development upon the city's water resources. The applicant's proposal to combine the undeveloped lot of record with a parcel that has an existing single-family home will remove the potential for a new single-family home to be constructed on the vacant lot. A new single-family home would entail the creation of significantly more impervious surface and require a larger shoreland setback variance than the proposed use, as well as a wetland setback variance that the proposed use does not require. Granting the requested shoreland variance to accommodate the construction of a detached garage that will result in the less intensive use of a riparian lot is in harmony with the intent of this Chapter. 0 0 The intent of the city's required front yard setback is to ensure adequate driveway length to accommodate off street parking, and to create a uniform aesthetic within residential areas by ensuring the presence of a minimum amount of front yard greenspace. In this instance, the parcel in question has an existing driveway that provides adequate off-street parking and is located at the end of a dead-end with no potential to negatively impact the neighbors' viewscape. Furthermore, the requested reduction in the front yard setback will reduce the need for a wetland setback variance and will significantly reduce the size of the requested shoreland setback variance. In this case, increasing the structure's distance from the lake is more important than increasing its distance from the public right of way. For the above reasons, the requested front yard setback variance is in harmony with the intent of this Chapter. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties" as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The shoreland, wetland, and front yard setbacks leave the parcel with a very constrained triangular building area, and relief from one or more setbacks would be required for most potential uses of the property. The applicant's proposed use of the parcel to accommodate an accessory structure is reasonable and is significantly less intensive than other potential reasonable uses for the property, i.e. a single-family home, and requires significantly smaller variances. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The property is a lot of a record and was platted before the city's zoning, wetland, and shoreland ordinances were adopted. The lot does not meet current standards and the non -conforming nature of the lot has created the restricted buildable area that necessitates the requested variances. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The size and scale of the proposed detached garage is permitted by the property's zoning district. Additionally, the location of the parcel at the end of a dead-end street on the far side of the property from the only neighboring residence means that granting the requested variance should not have any impact on the essential character of the neighborhood. 0 U f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2018-20, dated December 4, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters, is incorporated herein. "The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 13 -foot front yard setback and a 4 -foot shoreland setback variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. Parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be combined. 3. The drainage and utility easement between parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be vacated. 4. The applicant shall include all trees 6" dbh and larger within the construction limits for the accessory building and note trees to be removed. All preserved trees must be protected during construction. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 4th day of December, 2018. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Chairman CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (DENIAL) IN RE: The application of Richard Morris for the construction of a detached garage on a property zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF) — Planning Case 2018-20. On December 4, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Crest 4. Variance Findings — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The intent of the city's shoreland management district is to limit the placement of structures near recreational development lakes, in order to prevent the creation of impervious surfaces near water resources and preserve the view of the shoreline for lake users. Granting a variance to allow for the construction of a large detached garage within the lake setback would not be in harmony with the intent of this Chapter. Similarly, the city's front yard setback is designed to create a uniform viewscape within residential areas by ensuring the presence of a minimum amount of front yard greenspace and requiring accessory structures to be built at or behind the front most point of the primary structure. Allowing a detached garage to be built with a front yard setback significantly less than that of the primary structure would not be in line with the intent of this Chapter. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties" as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. 6 Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The applicant's home has an existing two -car garage, and, if the two parcels are combined, there are locations on the property where a smaller detached garage could be constructed without the need for a variance. The inability of a parcel zoned RSF to accommodate the maximum sized accessory structure permitted by the City Code is not a practical difficulty. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The property is a lot of a record and was platted before the city's zoning, wetland, and shoreland ordinances were adopted. The lot does not meet current standards and the non -conforming nature of the lot has created the restricted buildable area that necessitates the requested variances. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: No other property in the area has a 1,000 square foot accessory structure. The prevailing development pattern is for properties to have a home with an attached garage and a relatively small shed or water -oriented structure. Granting a variance to allow the construction of a large pole barn type structure would alter the essential character of the neighborhood. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2018-20, dated December 4, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters, is incorporated herein. "The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the request for a 13 -foot front yard setback and a 4 -foot shoreland setback variance." ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 4th day of December, 2018. CITY OF CHANHASSEN It "I Chairman CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC ARING PLANNING ASE NO. 2018-20 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard. The purpose of this hearing is to consider shoreland, wetland and front yard setback variances in order to build an accessory building (garagO on the lot located at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane and zoned Single Family Residential (TSF). Owner: Richard Morris A plan showing the location Of the proposal is available for Public review on the citys web site at www.ci.chanhassen. mn.us/2018-20 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. MacKenzie Walters Email: mwalters Qa ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1132 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, November 22 2018: No 4666) • PC- Do • Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers (mown as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. y b b was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwdy"�,/ xyzz k_= rie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this,?d' day of N 2018 0JYMME JEANNETTE BARK NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01131123 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch SCANNED Rate actually charged for the above matter...............................................$12.97 percolumninch PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, December 4, 2018 Subject Consider Variance to Build an Accessory Building (Garage) at 3790 Lone Cedar lane Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: C.1. Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 2018-20 The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 13 -foot front yard setback and a 4 -foot shoreland setback variance, subject to the conditions of approval; and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a 1,000 square -foot detached garage on a currently vacant parcel (PID 25.1700010). The proposed detached garage would encroach 13 feet into the front yard setback and 4 feet into the shoreland setback. In order to facilitate the construction of the proposed detached garage, the applicant would combine the parcel with his other property at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane. Combining these parcels would remove the possibility of a new single-family house being constructed on the vacant lot. Richard Moms (Owner) SITE INFORMATION PRESENT ZONING: Single Family Residential District - RSF LAND USE: Residential Low Density ACREAGE: .48 acres DENSITY: NA APPLICATION REGtn ATIONc Chapter 1, General Provisions ICfiN`-D Section 1-2. Rules of Construction and Definitions Chapter 20, Article II. Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article VI. Wetland Protection Chapter 20, Article VII. Shoreland Management District Chapter 20, Article XH. "RSF' Single -Family Residential District Section 20-615. Lot Requirements and Setbacks Chapter 20, Article )OUR. "General Supplemental" Regulations Section 20-904. Accessory Structures BACKGROUND In July 2018, PID 25.17000 10 was placed on the market. City staff received numerous inquiries as to the possibility of constructing a single-family home on the parcel. As the parcel is a lot of record, staff responded that a home could likely be constructed, but cautioned that multiple variances would be needed due to the presence of wetlands along the property's northern edge. On September 28, 2018, the applicant purchased this parcel along with the adjacent home at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane. The applicant subsequently approached city staff to discuss the possibility of constructing a detached garage on the parcel. Staff indicated that this would require a variance and the consolidation of the two parcels. RECOMMENDATION The applicant's proposal to combine PID 25.700010, the vacant parcel, with PID 25.1700020, 3790 Lone Cedar lane, and construct a detached garage represents a significantly less intensive use of PID 25.700010 than the construction of new single-family home. Additionally, the applicant's proposed placement of the detached garage maximizes its distance from both Lake Minnewashta and the property's wetland and minimizes the length of the driveway needed to access the garage. Since the proposed garage is located at the end of a street with no neighboring homes to the north, east, or south, reducing the front yard setback will not negatively affect the neighbor's viewscape. Staff recommends approval of the proposed variances with conditions. A full breakdown and analysis of the variance request can be found in the attached staff report. ATTACHMENTS: ❑ Staff Report L3 Findings of Fact and Decision Approval ❑ Findings of Fact and Decision Denial ❑ Variance Document ❑ Development Review Application ❑ Letter from Applicant ❑ Surveys ❑ Letter from Lester Buildings ❑ ERS Memo ❑ Affidavit of Mailing �T Y o F. iCITY OF CHANHASSEN 'Nx ass PROPOSED MOTION: PC DATE: December 4, 2018 CC DATE: January 14, 2019 REVIEW DEADLINE: January I, 2019 CASE #: 2018-20 BY: MW "The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 13 -foot front yard setback and a 4 -foot shoreland setback variance, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." (Note: A motion for denial and appropriate findings of fact are also included at the end of the report.) SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a 1,000 square foot detached garage on a currently vacant parcel (PID 251700010). The proposed detached garage would encroach 13 feet into the front yard setback and 4 feet into the shoreland setback. In order to facilitate the construction of the proposed detached garage, the applicant would combine the parcel with his other property at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane. Combining these parcels would remove the possibility of a new single-family house being constructed on the vacant lot. LOCATION: PID 251700010 OWNER: Richard Moms 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Chaska, MN 55318 PRESENT ZONING: 2030 LAND USE PLAN: ACREAGE: .48 acres RSF Residential Low Density DENSITY: NA LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Variance Request December 4, 2018 Page 2 PROPOSAUSUMMARY The applicant owns a home located at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane and an adjacent undeveloped parcel of land with PID 27500010. The vacant parcel is a lot of record and the city is required to allow the applicant reasonable use of the property. Since the parcel is zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF), reasonable use could be a single-family home; however, the applicant is instead proposing to construct a 1,000 square foot detached garage on the site. Due to the configuration of the lot of record and the presence of a wetland classified as preserve along the northern property line, the applicant is requesting a 4 -foot shoreland setback and 13 -foot front yard setback variance to accommodate the proposed garage. This placement would maximize the structure's distance from Lake Minnewashta and the wetland, and would minimize the size of the driveway required to service the garage, resulting in reduced impervious cover within the shoreland district. Since the City Code does not allow the construction of accessory structures without a primary structure, the applicant has agreed to combine the two parcels if the requested variance is approved. The applicant is also requesting that the city vacate the unused drainage and utilities easement located between the two parcels to accommodate the structure's proposed placement. Combining the parcels would permanently remove the potential for a new single-family home to be constructed on the vacant parcel. The applicant has noted that other uses for the parcel, such as a new single-family home, would result in significantly larger impacts on Lake Minnewashta and the property's wetlands. Of particular note are the increased amount of impervious surface that would be required to build a house on the parcel, the dock and associated vegetative removal rights that the new homeowner would enjoy, and generally increased intensity of use. Staff agrees with the applicant's assessment that their proposed use of the property is significantly less impactful on the lake and wetland than a new single-family home. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 1, General Provisions Section 1-2. Rules of Construction and Definitions Chapter 20, Article Il, Division 3. Variances Chapter 20, Article VI. Wetland Protection 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Variance Request December 4, 2018 Page 3 Chapter 20, Article VII. Shoreland Management District Chapter 20, Article XII. "RSF" Single Family Residential District Section 20-615. Lot requirements and setbacks. Chapter 20, Article XXIII. "General Supplemental Regulations Section 20-904. Accessory structures BACKGROUND In July 2018, PID 251700010 was placed on the market. City staff received numerous inquiries as to the possibility of constructing a single-family home on the parcel. As the parcel is a lot of record, staff responded that a home could likely be constructed, but cautioned that multiple variances would be needed due to the presence of wetlands along the property's northern edge. On September 28, 2018, the applicant purchased this parcel along with the adjacent home at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane. The applicant subsequently approached city staff to discuss the possibility of constructing a detached garage on the parcel. Staff indicated that this would require a variance and the consolidation of the two parcels. SITE CONDITIONS The property is zoned Single Family Residential District, is located within the city's Shoreland Management District, and has a wetland classified as preserve which runs along the northern lot line. This zoning district requires lots to be a minimum of 20,000 square feet, have front yard setbacks of 30 feet, setbacks of 75 feet from the lake's ordinary high water level, side yard setbacks of 10 feet, and limits parcels to a maximum of 25 percent lot coverage. Houses are limited to 35 feet in height and detached accessory structures are limited to 20 feet in height. The property must also have a 40 -foot buffer from the edge of the wetland, principal structures must be setback 40 feet from the edge of the buffer, and accessory structures must be setback 20 feet from the edge of the buffer. The lot is 15,135 square feet and is currently undeveloped; however, the applicant also owns the neighboring parcel at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane, which has a single-family home built in 1981. This parcel is approximately 37,026 square feet and has an estimated 6,508 square feet of lot cover resulting in 17.6 percent lot cover. This home appears to have a non- conforming wetland setback of 75.5 feet, but meets all other standards established by its zoning district and applicable City Code. 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Variance Request December 4, 2018 Page 4 NEIGHBORHOOD Cedar Crest The plat for this area was recorded in January of 1962. This plat and its lots predate the City of Chanhassen, its zoning codes, the shoreland management district, and the wetland protection ordinance. Additional subdivisions of the Cedar Crest plat subsequently took place between late 1975 and 1978 creating the Trolls -Glen development, and further subdivisions in 1987 and 2007 split up several of the larger lots along Lake Minnewashta. Changes to Highway 5 led to the city vacating the portion of Cedar Crest Court's, also known as Lone Cedar Lane, right of way in favor of a private street serving Cedar Crest's eastern parcels. Houses in the area vary significantly in age and scale, and many of the older homes have non -conforming elements or variances. Variances on Lone Cedar: 78-10 3895 Lone Cedar Circle: Approved - 18.5' front yard setback (house) 82-113892 Lone Cedar Lane: Approved - 11.23' front yard setback (house) 87-05 3900 Lone Cedar Lane: Approved - 5' rear yard (enclosed deck) 02-13 3840 Lone Cedar Lane: Approved - 10' bluff setback (retaining wall) 07-07 Gauer Addition: Approved - Access off of private street (2 lot subdivision) 14-20 3880 Lone Cedar Lane: Approved - 13' bluff setback (water oriented accessory structure) 15-20 3892 Lone Cedar Lane: Approved - 25' shoreland setback (retaining wall) ANALYSIS Lot Combination and Vacation The City Code does not allow for the construction of an accessory structure on a lot that does not have a principal structure. Additionally, the properties in question each have a 10 -foot drainage and utility easement on their respective sides of their shared interior lot line. The City Code does not permit accessory structures like detached garages to be located within a drainage and utility easement, and requires these structures to meet a required 10 -foot side yard setback. The applicant proposes to address these issues by combining the two parcels and requesting that the city vacate the drainage and utility 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Variance Request December 4, 2018 Page 5 easement. Combining the two lots would allow for the constriction of accessory structures since the house on 3790 Lone Cedar Lane would be the principal structure. It would also remove the interior lot line and its associated side yard setback. The Engineering Department is currently processing the applicant's request to vacate the drainage and utilities easement; however, the easement is not currently being used by the city and, once the lots are combined, there will be no anticipated need for the city to retain the easement. Vacation of the easement is a separate process that is currently scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council on January 28, 2019. If the City Council votes to approve the vacation, recording of the vacation and lot combination would occur concurrently. In addition to allowing for the proposed placement of the detached garage, combining the parcels would remove the potential for a new single-family home to be built on PID 251700010. Since PID 251700010 is a lot of record and zoned Residential Single Family (RSF) District, the city could be required to accommodate a single-family home as a "reasonable use" of the property. Due to the city's minimum standards for single-family homes, any single-family home would involve the creation of significantly more impervious surface and greater encroachment into the lot's shoreland and wetland setbacks. A single-family residence would also have the right to install a dock and conducted associated wetland alteration on the property. Once the parcels are combined, they would not be eligible for future subdivision since the lake and wetland setbacks would preclude the creation of two lots meeting the subdivision ordinance's minimum standards. For the above reasons, staff sup] combination and requested vaca Front Yard and Shoreland Set& PID 251700010 has a roughly tr the eastern one third of the trian a combined buffer and accessor The wetland also runs the lengtl but in this case, the lake's 75-fo restrictive. At its deepest point, l 135 feet from the front lot line to Lake Minnewashta's ordinary high water line. Between the property's shoreland and front yard setback, which require a combined 105 feet of setbacks, only a small triangle of the property is buildable. 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Variance Request December 4, 2018 Page 6 The applicant initially proposed placing the garage in this location that met the ordinance's front yard setback; however, in order to meet the front yard setback the proposed structure would require a 23 -foot shoreland and an 8 -foot wetland setback variance. Staff requested that the applicant propose an alternate location that maximized the property's distance from the lake and wetland by encroaching upon the front yard setback. Given the high quality of the property's wetland and the importance of protecting Lake Minnewashta, staff believes that every step should be taken to maximize the distance between the structure and the lake and wetland. The applicant subsequently proposed a location that would require a 13 -foot front yard setback, reduces the required shoreland setback variance to four feet, and removes the need for a wetland setback variance. The triangular shape of the lot means that only the northeast comer of the garage will actually be located within the 75 -foot shoreland setback. Due to the property's location at the end of a dead-end street with no residential properties facing it, many of the concerns involving viewscape and neighborhood character that typically apply to variance requests for reduced front yard setbacks do not apply. Since the property already has a large driveway and the garage will be accessed from east side rather than the southern facing elevation, there are no concerns about the distance between the structure and street being adequate to provide off-street parking spaces. Finally, Highway 5 has a large enough right of way that distance between the front property line and curb is over 45 feet, rather than the 10 to 15 feet that is typical for residential properties. For the above reasons, staff supports the requested front yard and shoreland variances. Impact on Neighborhood The vacant lot is bordered by Lake Minnewashta to the north and east, Highway 5 and the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum to the south, and the applicant's home to the west. The applicant's proposed detached garage is larger than other accessory structures found within the neighborhood; however, its size does not exceed the district's 1,000 square foot maximum size. Additionally, the proposed accessory structure has a smaller footprint and lower maximum height than an alternative use, such as a new single-family home, and will not generate additional traffic or lake use. Due to its relative isolation from other residential structures, the proposed variance is not expected to significantly affect the surrounding property owners. 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Variance Request December 4, 2018 Page 7 The applicant's proposal to combine PID 25700010, the vacant parcel, with PID 251700020, 3790 Lone Cedar Lane, and construct a detached garage represents a significantly less intensive use of PID 2570010 than the construction of new single-family home. Additionally, the applicant's proposed placement of the detached garage maximizes its distance from both Lake Minnewashta and the property's wetland and minimizes the length of the driveway needed to access the garage. Since the proposed garage is located at the end of a street with no neighboring homes to the north, east, or south, reducing the front yard setback will not negatively affect the neighbors' viewscape. Staff recommends approval of the proposed variances with conditions. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a 13 -foot front yard setback and a 4 - foot shoreland setback variance, subject to the conditions of approval and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Decision: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. Parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be combined. 3. The drainage and utility easement between parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be vacated. 4. The applicant shall include all trees 6" dbh and larger within the construction limits for the accessory building and note trees to be removed. All preserved trees must be protected during construction. Should the Planning Commission decide to deny the variance request, it is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion and attached Finding of Fact and Decision: "The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the request for a 13 -foot front yard setback and a 4 -foot shoreland setback variance and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decisions." ATTACHMENTS 1. Finding of Fact and Decision Approval 2. Finding of Fact and Decision Denial 3. Variance Document 4. Development Review Application 5. Letter From Applicant 6. Surveys 7. Letter from Lester Buildings 8. ERS Memo on 3790 Lone Cedar Lane 9. Public Hearing Notice Mailing List G:\PLAN\201 S Planning Cases\18-20 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Sub Var\Staff Report -3790 Lone Cedar Ln_PC.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (APPROVAL) IN RE: The application of Richard Moms for the construction of a detached garage on a property zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF) — Planning Case 2018-20. On December 4, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Crest 4. Variance Findings— Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The intent of the city's shoreland and wetland ordinances is to minimize the impact of development upon the city's water resources. The applicant's proposal to combine the undeveloped lot of record with a parcel that has an existing single-family home will remove the potential for a new single-family home to be constructed on the vacant lot. A new single-family home would entail the creation of significantly more impervious surface and require a larger shoreland setback variance than the proposed use, as well as a wetland setback variance that the proposed use does not require. Granting the requested shoreland variance to accommodate the construction of a detached garage that will result in the less intensive use of a riparian lot is in harmony with the intent of this Chapter. The intent of the city's required front yard setback is to ensure adequate driveway length to accommodate off street parking, and to create a uniform aesthetic within residential areas by ensuring the presence of a minimum amount of front yard greenspace. In this instance, the parcel in question has an existing driveway that provides adequate off-street parking and is located at the end of a dead-end with no potential to negatively impact the neighbors' viewscape. Furthermore, the requested reduction in the front yard setback will reduce the need for a wetland setback variance and will significantly reduce the size of the requested shoreland setback variance. In this case, increasing the structure's distance from the lake is more important than increasing its distance from the public right of way. For the above reasons, the requested front yard setback variance is in harmony with the intent of this Chapter. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties" as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The shoreland, wetland, and front yard setbacks leave the parcel with a very constrained triangular building area, and relief from one or more setbacks would be required for most potential uses of the property. The applicant's proposed use of the parcel to accommodate an accessory structure is reasonable and is significantly less intensive than other potential reasonable uses for the property, i.e. a single-family home, and requires significantly smaller variances. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The property is a lot of a record and was platted before the city's zoning, wetland, and shoreland ordinances were adopted. The lot does not meet current standards and the non -conforming nature of the lot has created the restricted buildable area that necessitates the requested variances. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The size and scale of the proposed detached garage is permitted by the property's zoning district. Additionally, the location of the parcel at the end of a dead-end street on the far side of the property from the only neighboring residence means that granting the requested variance should not have any impact on the essential character of the neighborhood. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2018-20, dated December 4, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters, is incorporated herein. DECISION "The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 13 -foot front yard setback and a 4 -foot shoreland setback variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. Parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be combined. 3. The drainage and utility easement between parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be vacated. 4. The applicant shall include all trees 6" dbh and larger within the construction limits for the accessory building and note trees to be removed. All preserved trees must be protected during construction. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 4th day of December, 2018. CITY OF CHANHASSEN RW Chairman CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (DENIAL) IN RE: The application of Richard Morris for the construction of a detached garage on a property zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF) — Planning Case 2018-20. On December 4, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Crest 4. Variance Findings —Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The intent of the city's shoreland management district is to limit the placement of structures near recreational development lakes, in order to prevent the creation of impervious surfaces near water resources and preserve the view of the shoreline for lake users. Granting a variance to allow for the construction of a large detached garage within the lake setback would not be in harmony with the intent of this Chapter. Similarly, the city's front yard setback is designed to create a uniform viewscape within residential areas by ensuring the presence of a minimum amount of front yard greenspace and requiring accessory structures to be built at or behind the front most point of the primary structure. Allowing a detached garage to be built with a front yard setback significantly less than that of the primary structure would not be in line with the intent of this Chapter. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties" as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The applicant's home has an existing two -car garage, and, if the two parcels are combined, there are locations on the property where a smaller detached garage could be constructed without the need for a variance. The inability of a parcel zoned RSF to accommodate the maximum sized accessory structure permitted by the City Code is not a practical difficulty. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The property is a lot of a record and was platted before the city's zoning, wetland, and shoreland ordinances were adopted. The lot does not meet current standards and the non -conforming nature of the lot has created the restricted buildable area that necessitates the requested variances. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: No other property in the area has a 1,000 square foot accessory structure. The prevailing development pattern is for properties to have a home with an attached garage and a relatively small shed or water -oriented structure. Granting a variance to allow the construction of a large pole barn type structure would alter the essential character of the neighborhood. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2018-20, dated December 4, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters, is incorporated herein. DECISION "The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the request for a 13 -foot front yard setback and a 4 -foot shoreland setback variance." ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 4th day of December, 2018. CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chairman CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2018-20 L Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 13 -foot front yard setback and a 4 -foot shoreland setback variance. 2. Pro . The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Crest. 3. Conditions. The variance approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. Parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be combined. 3. The drainage and utility easement between parcels PID 251700010 and PID 251700020 must be vacated. 4. The applicant shall include all trees 6" dbh and larger within the construction limits for the accessory building and note trees to be removed. All preserved trees must be protected during construction. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse. Dated: December 4, 2018 Fm (SEAL) AND: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN Denny Laufenburger, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2018 by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 i C_ .r4,G CITY OF CHANHASSEN APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Date:) J t PC Date: 0 14 ( 1% CC Date: —1—LD—Li U 60 -Day Review Date. Section• • .• (check all that apply) (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment .........................$600 ❑ Create over 3 lots ...................... $600 + $15 per lot ( lots) ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ...... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑ Single -Family Residence.................................$325 ❑ Final Plat ..........................................................$700 ❑ All Others.. ....................................................... $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC) ........ ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence..$325 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 ❑ Rezoning (REZ) ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD)...................$750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................$100 ❑ All Others .........................................................$500 ❑ Sign Plan Review...................................................$150 ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Administrative ..................................................$100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts'......................$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: ( thousand square feet) Include number of existi employees: Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts.........................................$500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit ( units) ❑ Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Create 3 lots or less.........................................$300 ❑ Create over 3 lots ...................... $600 + $15 per lot ( lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots) ..................................$300 ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑ Final Plat ..........................................................$700 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)' 'Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC) ........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance (VAR) ....................................................$200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence...............................$150 ❑ All Others .......................................................$275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ......................................................$100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) ................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ❑ Notification Sign (City to install and remove)....................................................................................................................... $200 tA Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting)...................................................$3 per address (_ addresses) Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply).......................................................................$50 per document ❑ Conditional Use PermitISI} Interim Use Permit [:1 Site Plan Agreement El Vacation H Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (2 deeds) ❑ Easements (_ easements) ❑ Deeds TOTAL FEE: Section 2: Required information Description of Proposal: /3rJ/c.D AN Ac Le5SS go/ Property Address or Location: 37?0 L""Ie— CCD,4e 44n/t C#A-5K,4 / MV _5-S:-3 4 Parcel #:.2577ckx�/O 20 Legal Description: LC,T/ rLOC/C/ CC'pq>ZCELEsT Total Acreage: / 33 Wetlands Present? IN Yes F1 No (Lr 2 13L0 U-' / Present Zoning: RLS Requested Zoning: aES Present Land Use Designation: 5 Z )7e -Z (-7' Requested Land Use Designation: Existing Use of Property: S/ylJ X1'5 2s/70LX)-20, W� ® Check box K separate narrative is attached. VAc 4NT LoT it l70tk>/O r-, aE b-717zRC� zJflfM COI-)50LrDA-77oA/ IF Lor5, • • • - •In ffogfilmom APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application. I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc, with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Email: Signature: _ Contact: Phone: Cell: Fax: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. 1 understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: /Gr c -#*,v ;'� Address: 3 7I1,J City/State/Zip: '�'/M59,4 Email: JZ ICK b.-1 & ac 4L cx-.-r Contact: /ZicK Nl .Z��S Phone: Cell: Fax: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. Signature: PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Contact: Phone: Cell: Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: ❑ Property Owner Via: []Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑ Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: _ ❑ Engineer Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. FORNI and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. Richard D Morris 3790 Lone Cedar Lane, Chaska, MN 55318 (City of Chanhassen) 651-261-4469 rickdmt@uwalumni.com 11/2/2018 Mr. Bob Generous & City Planning Commission City of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Generous & City Planning Commission, On 9/28/2018, 1 purchased a home at 3750 Arboretum Blvd. within the city limits of Chanhassen. The City and I have since changed the address to 3790 Lone Cedar Lane to match the neighbors and facilitate emergency response and postal services. Two lots of record were in included in the sale. There is a 1981 single family home on PID 25700020. There is a vacant lot adjacent with PID 25700010. Both are on Lake Minnewashta's south side. A variance from the 100' wetland setback is requested from the city to allow the building of a 26'x 38.5' garage accessory building on the vacant lot. I've met with Mr. Bob Generous and Ms. Vanessa Strong regarding the project. Both the City Building Department and Water Resources staff support an accessory building as the optimal usage for this lot versus the alternative of another single-family home. As an official lot of record, a case could be made to build a house on this lot as an alternative to the accessory building proposal. To be a good steward of the lake and water resources, I will consolidate the two lots into one contingent upon approval of the variance, and thereby permanently remove the potential for another single-family home. I am requesting vacation of the drainage and utility easement. The City Engineer confirmed the easement is not used. Recording of the vacation will occur concurrently with the recording of the variance and consolidation of the lots. If another single-family home was built, it would result in more impact to the wetland and lake with another dock, erosion from usage, and riparian owner weed removal rights of 2500 square feet plus a 15' path of weed removal to clear water. Another house would also impact a city fire hydrant, the access road, and a drainage ditch. Lot 1 is zoned for a single-family home and a hardship of usage exists from the lot shape and lack of buildable space. Mr. Generous and City staff support waiving the 30' frontage setback to the proposed 17' setback to provide more spacing from the lake OHW mark. Instead of the 75' setback from the OHW mark, the proposed location is 71.8' for one corner as shown on the Site Plan. 99% of the building area satisfies the 75' lake setback and City Code Section 20-481. The previous (and currently website ordinance posted) OHW mark was 944.5', but it was recently changed to 945.9'. Your consideration and approval of this variance request for an accessory building with the condition of lot consolidation is appreciated. As noted above, this plan is supported by Water Resources and City Building Dept. staff. Respectfully submitted, Rick Morris E105fNO LLHiLL neeusnp9s: RRORosm Lccu pescRvtroac Lit aoaaneeaea Alow..r M- Rfck Mertz 9790 Lone Ccear Lane CFBSFa. MN 5018 sTq� Ntyy Np S EX SMG LEG sc4RW"MS Ae ,"&ey StY ft" $Ne PAN -Iw- Rick Lone Y) Lone LED/ Lane CMska, UN 55318 <9� N Fly yF� qsy T,q YYVY.Yc d \ YYVY.Yc Omptifftcato of w all'"r -for - Rick Morris /9 \` 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Chaska, MN 55318p WEI�AND EDGE OF WET LAND �. !• AS DELINEATED BY 21y / SOIL INVESTIGATION Z-0, \ AND DESIGN, O&W18 4Vpi 3 / 5 / � 0 0 MINIMUM SETBACKS: '� \ FRONT: 30' SIDE: 10' WETLAND: 100''/ O.H.W. 75' u'mo.. j / e`• ` \ DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: )/ a'� ,r\\ Lot 1, Block 1, CEDAR CREST, Carver It .0 m Iy County. Minnesota. � O,yE / \ m, ,� �� Fountl 7"R /zef'dfE,. CE CFO'OR B / Np° yq. �\ ` a' _!' Set a V �A \ 4 � p cejL Cqy \ ♦ with a b Fre H .tTlo.✓ m� cQ, G>c':� A Surve1 WETLAND ` IMPERVIOI/S SURFACE COVERAGE: x Spot E `e !' Y s / \ \ NVM PROPOSED WtRV: f9S.F. \ \ PROPOSED ORNEWA Y' <91212 SF EXISTING DRIVEWAY: W&F. \ \ TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: <1912S.F.� ` LOT AREA,5.,35 S.F. STgTF S�a�Jf.F SOLJ)yFR/r 1 1 LIPERV/0l/S COVERAGE: 4128% wa e.,.erowelrmrm;r::.,,.�arw,Maa,aaera�o.f.�m, 410� I L�ams�.mmular..a�re saa aaw,aeP,am.� Np�s<iA,E� \ LAND 2z10 10/11/18 REVISED: IOH6178-POLE BARN 16M An Stwsn V. Iaa•M tksnas No. pate PROL #1623-00 T.,. m aort"Saslo of gurwt -for - Abraham Abbariao MINIMUM SETBACKS: FRONT: 30' SIDE. 10' WETLAND: foo' O.H.W. 75' DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Lof 1, Block 1, CEDAR CREST, Carver County, Minnesota. i/ u( / 0s GM1n 1 hereby cer#ly that this survey was prepared by me or under my duet( supervision and that / am a duly licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the taws of the State of Minnesota. 22703 05/11118 Steven V Ische License No. Date I—x \ WE4�ANU EDGE OF WET LAND AS DELINEATED BY `\ SO/L INVESTIGATION \ AND DESIGN, 0~8 \ — 160'OFFSET 6 � WETUND xy✓ \ 1 "'a e \ 6x \ \ \ a \ \ /m C L Fe FautM 1 o Set 12 wM m1 d Fire Hy A Survey X Spot EI 7 \ \ K'Y N � ryE�roT \ NOTE: BASED ON THE MINIMUM O S STArENI ytv `\ SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, THIS 4ry \ LAND PROPERTY CONTAINS 0.0 SQUARE FEET OF BUILD -ABLE AREA. ` _ 16M Alb va PROJ. #1580-00 (.-RESKAER /N6S October 16, 2018 Rick Morris 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Chaska, MN 55318 Day Phone: 651-261-4469 Dear Rick Moms, Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with a quotation for a Lester Uni-Frame Embedded building. For your review, please see the enclosed proposal, which is based on our understanding of your building requirements up to this point. As you review it, please be assured that we understand new building projects always come with many decisions and a fair amount of stress! Our goal is to help make those decisions easier and reduce your stress with what we feel is our industry's most responsive and collaborative buying experience. Some other important factors set us apart and help us offer long-term customer satisfaction. For instance, the renowned quality and engineering standards of Lester buildings means you get the most value from your investment. In fact, with a solid reputation going back to 1947, Lester Buildings feature: • Unmatched design flexibility to meet your unique needs • Fast, cost-effective construction • Strong, straight and true structures, with excellent curb appeal • An industry-leading Lifetime Structural Design warranty Of course, we do our own part by providing full-service project planning and construction services. We do so with one goal in mind: to complete your project just as you envisioned it, in the agreed-upon time frame. Our team here at Lester Buildings LLC. stands ready to work with you and we look forward to your comments and questions. Thanks again and, as always, feel free to contact me anytime at 612-756-1395 orjwight@lesterbuildings.com. Respectfully Submitted, 10011 'Cl \\'i2ht Territory Manager enc. Attachment A Detailed Building Specifications for Rick Morris, 3750 Arboretum Blvd, Chaska, MN 55318 Lester Buildings LLC. proposes to deliver, furnish and erect to industry standards the described building to the following location: Rick Morris, 3750 Arboretum Blvd. Chaska. MN 55318. Lester Structural System: Uni-Frame Embedded Width: 26'-0" Length: 38-0" Clear Height: 12'-0" Building Code: IBC -2012 End Use: Personal Use - Garage Risk Class: General Use Ground Snow Load (psf): 50 UmForm Roof Snow Load (psf): 33.3 Roof Dead Load (psf): 4 Truss Bottom Chord Load (psf): 5 Design Bottom Chord Braces for Ceiling Load: Yes This Warranty allows for a properly designed Snow Retention Trim to be installed on this building. Design Wind Speed (mph): 115 Ultimate Warranted Wind Speed (mph): 90.9 Exposure Category: C Quotation on a code clear span building system with columns embedded in the ground at 9'-7" OC and poured concrete footings. a 3 ply 2x6 sidewall columns a 1 ply truss 2x6/2x6 • Poured concrete footings Roof and Roof Atemo Material: Uni-Rib 28ga steel- AZ50 SMP Insulation: None Sheathing: None Fasteners: Colored Screws Top Chord Slope: 4 112 Overhangs: 12" Overhang around perimeter of building Bottom Chord Slope: 0 / 12 Annex or Dormers: Noce Additional: 2x6 roof purlins pocketed in saddle hangers between trusses for a flush roof system Exterior As EWI EW2 SWI SW2 Panel Material: Uni-Rib 28 a Steel - AZ50 SMP Panel Material: Uni-Rib 28 a - AZ50 SMP Panel Material: Uni-Rib 28 a - AZ50 SMP Panel Material: Uni-Rib 28 a - AZ50 SMP Fasteners: Colored Screws Fasteners: Colored Screws Fasteners: Colored Screws Fasteners: Colored Screws Sheathing: None Sheathing: Noce Sheathing: None Sheathing: None Insulation: House Wrap Insulation: House Wrap Insulation: use Wrap Insulation: House Wrap Wainscot Material: Uni- Rib 28 a - AZ50 SMP Wainscot Material: Uni- Rib 28 a - AZ50 SMP Wainscot Material: Uni- Rib 28 a - AZ50 SMP Wainscot Material: Uni- Rib 26 a - AZ50 SMP Wainscot Insulation: House W Wainscot Insulation: House W Wainscot Insulation: House W Wainscot Insulation: House Wrap Gable Material: None Gable Material: None Eave Material: None Eave Material: None Additional: 2x6 flush frame (bookshelf) wall gins at 24" OC. Wainscot at 36". Interior Waus/Pardtion WaNC ' EWl EW2 SWI Additional Material: Uni-Rib Material: Uni-Rib Material: Uni-Rib Overhead Door Opening - Custom / Custom Size (I6'wide x10'high) No overhead door included. Liner 30ga-G40 Liner 30ga-G40 Liner 30ga-G40 C Poly Poly Poly 1 Insulation: 6" FG Insulation: 6" FG Insulation: 6" FG Insul Unlaced (R- Insul Unlaced (R- Insul Unlaced (R- 19) 19) l9 SW2 Ceiling Partition Wall Material: Uni-Rib Material: Uni-Rib Material: None Liner 30ga-G40 Liner 30ga-G40 Poly Poly Insulation: 6" FG Insulation: R-49 Insul Unfaced (R- Blown Cellulose 19 Attic Insulation Additional: Fully lined and insulated. Includes Attic access doors, blown attic insulation and vapor barrier. Exterior and interior finishes, require "surface mounted" electrical and plumbing fixtures and connections. Any holes cut into the final finish material will require a labor and materia; surcharge. Consult our salesperson for an estimate. Openins lkhednk Refer to floor plan and or elesation drawings. Al Door and Windows Product Bulletin. and Openings Schedule Re ort for additional information. IDQuant it T / Model / Size A I I Overhead Door Opening - Custom / Custom Size (I6'wide x10'high) No overhead door included. B 3 Window - Commercial / Window Vinyl Slider Thermal Pane / 4'0" Wide x 3'0" High with color matched grids. insulation in the frames and removable screens C 1 Wa&Door - Commercial /"Door 7100 22x36 Lite / 3'0"x6B" with color matched grids, lever latches, door latch guard and deadhoh prep D 1 Overhead Door Opening - Custom / Custom Size (ITwide x IO'high) No overhead door included. Additional: No overhead doors included. Refer to Accessory Product Bulletins for additional information. ID I Quantity/ Model / Size A1 Rid - Metal / Rid e - Metal / Rid - Vented B 2 Cupola - Louver / Square - Louver / 24" Louver- TIOn-operating Downspouts: SI: Additional: Continuous vented ridge full length of building. Gutters: SI: Gutter-F.B.O. S2: Gutter - F.B.O. Downspouts: SI: 0 S2: 0 Snow Retention Trim: SI: No S2: No Additional: Roof Colon Roof: Non-Cfg Shingles: Cupola Roof: Quaker Gra N/A Quaker Gra Eave Trim: Rake: Cupola Body: Quaker Gray Quaker Gray Snow White Gutter: Ridge Cap: Cupola Base: N/A Quaker Gray Quaker Gra Ridge Vent: N/A Wall Colon Exterior Walls: Wainscot: Ceiling Liner: Porch Roof: Pewter Gray Quaker Gray Liner White Quaker Gra Gable: Eave Finish: Wall Liner: Porch Column Coven: N/A N/A N/A Snow White Gable Louver: Accent: Porch Vblock: N/A N/A Snow White Insulated Wall Banco: Downspout: Porch Ceiling or Soffit: N/A N/A Snow White Soffit: Snow White ODCRIM & Trim Colas Base Trim: Overhead Door Panel: Signature Sidg. Door Dutch Dr. Insert: Snow While N/A Field: N/A N/A Comer: Overhead Door Jamb: Signature Sidg Trim: Dutch Dr. Frame: Snow White Snow White N/A N/A Skill. Door Panel: Walk Door: Signature Sidg Jamb: Hone Stall: N/A AJ White N/A N/A Sidg. Door Verticals: Walk Door Trim: Signature Sidg Window: Mansard Roof: N/A Snow White N/A N/A Sidg. Door Jamb: Window: Signature Sidg Track Mansard Fascia: N/A Hayfield White Cover: N/A N/A Sliding Door Track: Window Trim: Large Door Panel: Mansard Soffit: N/A Hayfield White N/A N/A Sliding Door Bottom Girt: Shutters: Large Door Trim: Clear Opening Trim: N/A N/A N/A N/A Curtain Opening Trim: N/A Additional: No concrete floor Attachment B Inclusions/Exclusions Item Includes Excludes Site preparation X Fill and preparation needed for concrete grade heights X Lester building material package X Labor X Delivery X Builders risk insurance X General liability and workman' comp. X Signed engineered drawings X Architectural stamp X Local building permits X Concrete and placement of concrete X Jobsite electricftv X Final exterior landscaping - grading X Electrical hook-up of overhead doors X Interior finishing X Dumpster X Complete construction project debris placed in customer provided du sten X Tax X Exclusions Note All items not specifically listed above or noted elsewhere are excluded from this proposal. The investment proposal assumes building site is prepared and level, with no underground obstructions, has easy and obtainable Tractodl'railer access and has no other features that can inhibit efficient construction performance. Any delays or additional costs resulting from owner(s) or owner(s) agents negligence to or failure to comply with any part of this contract, or have riot completed site preparation prior to start of construction will be charged extra material and labor according to Change Order Procedures and Schedules. Work Authorization No holds are applied to this project. It will be fully processed, produced, and delivered as scheduled. Total Building Investment 1 $41,889.91 Includes 8% Promo discount through October 27, 2018 Note: This investment proposal is based on Lester Improv Project 060A-15406-02-00, and the Price File QP092218 that expires on Nov 10, 2018. Authorized this day of , 20_ By (Buyer Signature) Printed Name: By (TM Signature) Printed Name: a m a s � li L SO � FLWRPIAN DEALER INFO. CUSTOMER INFO. BUILDING DESCRIPTION C.Approval 8" Direction �W- 060,1500602-00 I ler WW II RM Moms 26'0' z 36'3' a 12'-0' PRrDS=.+DfN FKs ONIv Cedar Lane 3760 Lane Cedar Lane Uni-Frame Embedded New Pra e. MN 56071 Chaska, MN 55318 QPD92018 GATE: U Ba'a'su� F 5.. µea� waw C wru A4 ENDWA FSECTION DMF � Rt FROM E, •s� a wa CUSTOMER INFO. BUILDING DESCRIPTION I CU Aa l BM2 ONxlbn vRw�O60A-i5a06-02-00 E R NLY PR�PO�� / µea� waw C wru A4 ENDWA FSECTION DMF SISISECTION FROM E, DEALER INFO. CUSTOMER INFO. BUILDING DESCRIPTION I CU Aa l BM2 ONxlbn vRw�O60A-i5a06-02-00 NLY PR�PO�� QESTE/T JennBe Rck Mart6 28-0.383.,2-0 Y ='�Owu �"""~"'"`�"^•""�• /tl/LO//68 eZrM 25 U CeEar Lena 3180 Lone cw., Lane UnW.. EmbeE wru Naw Prague. MN 56011 Dlueka, MN 55318 OPOB2018 mu n9��1Ei �°l`s111 �z�iy1 ,� .r. ::E1'4 �.r,F.t 1It V @=MN� SR � 1 E I E.ATV214 �. awxA I )HIV... DEALER INFO. CUSTOMER INFO. BUILDING DE9LMIPM LtWniv MFlavl 81,11 a.bw»i qxu p60A-1510"x-02-00 P UND99 L N�N^3OLv QESTEB Jen 6Q vftm NO*Martb 26d xW-YIt*2'4T /Y/!D/YCS 2U34 G r Lene 3/90 Lane Gaon "IN, Unlfr Eftft1W New Prep*, MN 500/1 CIvNM, MN 66318 QPD92016 ul a TO: MacKenzie Walters, Planner I FROM: Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Specialist DATE: December 4, 2019 SUBJ: Variance to combine lots, 3790 Lone Cedar Lane The applicant did not submit tree cover as part of the existing conditions survey, so staff cannot confum which, if any, trees will be removed for the proposed accessory building. Staff recommends that the applicant meet ordinance requirement when applying for the building permit and show all trees within the construction limits on the survey. Recommendations: 1. The applicant shall include all trees 6" dbh and larger within the construction limits for the accessory building and note trees to be removed. All preserved trees must be protected during construction. 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on November 21, 2018, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing to consider shoreland, wetland and front yard setback variances in order to build an accessory building (garage) on the lot located at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane, Planning Case File No. 2018-20 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me thia;j U day of Nc ^ mbC-- , 2018. Notary Public L/VVl �ixn /1L4N- Kim . Meuv ssen, Deputy JEAN M. STECKLING Notary Pudb-Atinnasota ►y cwmw..w� 9k r� s,. ao,e Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not Intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in vanous city county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shownand is to be used for reference purposes only The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free. and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigationaltrading or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or duedbon or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damagesand expressly waives all claims. and agrees to defend indemnifyand hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User its employees or agentsor th rd parties which apse out of the users access or use of data onowded. Disclahner This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various oily, county. state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigationaltracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or duecbon or precision in the depiction of geographic features The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §46603. Subd 21 (2000). and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claimsand agrees to defendindemnity and hold hamdess the City from any and all claims brought by User. its employees or agentsor third parties which arse out of the users access or use of data provided •TAX_NAME* •TA) ADD_L1s aTAX_ADD_L2s,*TAX_ADD_L3s eNext Recordn.TAX_NAME» •TAX_ADD_L1» 4(TAX_ADD_L2e, KTAX_ADD_L3» Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date 8 Thu: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not sti rt until IWer in the evening, i:lioitnciiw w the oder M tM agenda. Location: Cq Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Markel Boulevard To consider shoreland, wetland and front yard setback Proposal: variances in order to build an accessory building (garage) on lot licant: Richard Morris Property 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Location: A location map is en ite mrerx silo a MIs notiu. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project, During the meeting, the Chair will lead the Cyt Happens public hearing through the following steps. at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. _ If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: the city's projects web page at: vyrrwxi.chanhassen.mn us2018-20. If you wish to talk to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us2018-20. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact MacKenzie Questions & Walters by email at mwaltersfo$LchanhasseO mn us or by Comments: phone at 952-227-1132. If you choose to submit written phone at 952-227-1132. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project website listed above the Thursday online on the project website listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.usMou me to sign up; wwwci.chanhassen.mmus/no me to sign u ! Mwb.R....`..'cvb.or.e v.v.. u... w...b ; C.; PPOmep..r PrPwry wYPWsoo rr�av.��•Pae4a.c4b.M1Pr..bcmnmb� eb'/bN b4,bI01 oIWplYymnwbq /vR'.Y.bb T4snYbOb rbbhmNbV ' b4v bP�Wmbb M.6rb pry0Y nymyvi sb aremr,uwWvlits bpvbw �4sbt 4bM1 14Yns4 tarry LPmsm�sbq YYl bl pe../bb[.vY.CPe�mlPb rrwanb,bam CmmYm.i lrM1 PdcRtr.V ObatPYtrM1te�abbbs t�,irOM1MMvbM1 GryPC tic Cwb wvPCY Mr'ImeLmnem'rbbmssv� R 'R ^W rweb Ptrn P�mllr CM1Cbrawt�WbP bbtrbur wbmaer�simv ewnrn ��1emb^�r . nuAtab EYb Abb 519 W bpbsrr WoVY b 4pW W npn®pgyvue M1 yb[ar sbrbr W.bC BbbNdbbab btssplsr M1rWewaiMpYbmbYb Mry pPbnesgbbba�tbntrsPM1 Pe®Cutlb141.�M1 PImV aPbwr uaabq b04ab WtlYV trM1 L4LurNRYlre • A4'p=a��brrm.,Tab PbllrmYtlbMPA' 011nbwlarrrwbqu4tb rbrbpalmYOarNVrs PW44 9bIIYPbrbbfYbeybYM1Obbr Y/�rRr.YbbG 04slr1 • aoY rY W.Yq LPmsP�4bM1 Plot RW.V M1 rIrbM WUM IY.Y ba YYW IbbYsrbCtlbb %Pb M1UOaRm.ab MltlrlbM1rbbl4M1Gry CN1 rrW.e�b MrubM1pbb/Y6Cnrb ybl mba rY WI sNTrYNbm Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Dale 3 Time: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may rid atan unit later in the owning, rid' w the order A the a9eno& Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Boulevard To consider shoreland, wetland and front yard setback Proposal: variances in order to build an accessory building (garage) on M. Applicant- Richard Morris Property 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Location: A 10�cm map Is on the reverN side of tNa notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2 The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us2018-20. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact MacKenzie Questions 3 Walters by email at mwalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by Comments: phone at 952-227-1132. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project website listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas. packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to wwwci.chanhassen.mmus/no me to sign u ! L4anIM1 P...ab.: • ai�iMY PVnllbnpMllpnilb Sb Pion RtwY� CmObYIN Ybm Wn VMEbb taYevba�4, LapbYwwPe�MrwbnPe Pb C00r MwbAbrgY.•Prb Reny 4tr.M1Ptr�bgLmmm� LF ubenN nYrrr n4MY virnwWbllY dM1 YbaYsb4nOaeCM1aarbrb�nbORa rA rYtrbE {Ory Y.n�lbO lM1 nbrVly •bllVbee.�N�mM1bt/r�b[�Ta!/f1i/Prb1f. 11mebmbbamm�ab�Cm ll�e%YeY bbb�eObY NM1P� 9Cm�mrbn^WY MYa TaM14lcwwwgM1T.RNanmetrbM1n Mf<mnbo�Ye Carty nf<Rrere abbbatrM1 �M1brderrm�nwbbmbrb L4Lbr4brRtrTMPWr. .IVIlYv10FM1 PbwY CmnamrlW.nbWm amYP.bb u.ab¢beM1Mtrb WarnPmPb +i CM1Lh Cbrbi bug bawp bb bYlsa�e.bbbhn� W.YbmmbmlMW'Y • bnYy $r }bb $IB W bpYe a gbbbbbpsi M! W 6rrubY M1rpWrsertess6 6vn444YlY brM1 mnWdY nbrWwaRbbbbmbYb rA'PrugYObbaTbi bltmaM1 P4a.rILW COY wit M1 Wary MpMtrY nPbababarNaMbptr M1Cry LP/f�.Wa. • arbebnmp bJOpebbpssNYebfusebpeY4tmYibM1ur. dlniYgrRem.q.Gb W YI.M1,bPtblml�Cry 10. P9W &blblbalWbb Ontr M1pfbCeTarytretbr]reYtq. • bM1rYPbwO CPmrtOibb M1PMCRrwO rb W CP.NC��u Yse sbbbab try PTrbObPM1 e'CrbM1gbaem.a 4.ObCnPr epCtblil Ur COub. rpiwbblw aseabbrbCbnM1sel C>Yt rb rba RYRbWM1RPr� PIN TAX NAME 251700010 ABRAHAM & DOROTHY ABBARIAO 250080200 JEFFREY J&DEBRAJ PAPKE 252940030 SCOTT P & LAURIE A GAUER 252940020 WAWH BS FAMILY TRUST 250080100 REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MINN 251700030 KENNETH R & MARTHA L SORENSEN TAX_ADD_L1 PO BOX 26 6180 CARDINAL DR S 3820 LONE CEDAR CIR 265 BAREFOOT BEACH BLVD # 405 31915TH ST SE 424 DONHOW E BLD 3800 LONE CEDAR CIR TAX_ADD_1.2 TAX_ADD L3 SHAPE CHANHASSEN MN 55317-0026 3750 ARBORETUM BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-3102 CHASKA MN 55318-9652 BONITA SPRINGS FL 34134-2502 3810 LONE CEDAR OR MINNEAPOLIS MN 55455-0179 3675 ARBORETUM DR CHASKA MN 55318-9652 3800 LONE CEDAR CIR E CITY OF CHANHASSEN 0 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on November 21, 2018, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing to consider shoreland, wetland and front yard setback variances in order to build an accessory building (garage) on the lot located at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane, Planning Case File No. 2018-20 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this;J,nk day of w mOcr . 2018. Notary Public Kimt Meuwwissen, Deputy JEANM. STEIKIING Notary Public -Minnesota 4,, My C.unbebn E>tpree Jen 31.2018 Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims. and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data Provided. Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features- The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which anse out of the users access or use of data provided. 0 ((TAX—NAME)) ((TAX—ADD—L1» ((TAX—ADD—L2)), 4(TAX_ADD_L3» ((Next Record))((TAX_NAME» ((TAX—ADD—Ll)) ((TAX_ADD_L2)),((TAX_ADD_L3)) Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Boulevard To consider shoreland, wetland and front yard setback Proposal: variances in order to build an accessory building (garage) on lot. Applicant: Richard Morris Property 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Location: L A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us12018-20. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact MacKenzie Questions & Walters by email at mwaltersna ci.chanhassen.al or by Comments: phone at 952-227-1132. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project website listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterabons, Rezonirgs, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within at least 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on dm subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These nations are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a pert of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission'a recommendation. Remnings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Coundl except rezonings and land use amendments from restimmial to commercial/ndustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested permn(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing. the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. 1 you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning staff person named an the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not e start until later in the evening,depending on the order of the a ends. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Boulevard To consider shoreland, wetland and front yard setback Proposal: variances in order to build an accessory building (garage) on lot. Applicant: Richard Morris Property 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. • 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us12018-20. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact MacKenzie Questions & Walters by email at mwalters(fti.chanhassen.mn.us or by Comments: phone at 952-227-1132. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online on the project website listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within at least 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing Any interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all comment information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a pad of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and [and use amendments from residential to commercialliindustrial • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete Any person waning to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonimpresentative is encouraged! to provide a contact for the city Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning staff person named on the notification. PIN TAX -NAME 251700010 ABRAHAM & DOROTHY ABBARIAO 250080200 JEFFREY & DEBRA JPAPKE 252940030 SCOTT P & LAURIE A GAUER 252940020 WAWH BS FAMILY TRUST 250080100 REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MINN 251700030 KENNETH R & MARTHA L SORENSEN TAX -ADD -Ll PO BOX 26 6180 CARDINAL DR S 3820 LONE CEDAR CIR 265 BAREFOOT BEACH BLVD # 405 319 15TH ST SE 424 DONHOWE BLD 3800 LONE CEDAR CIR TAX_ADD_1-2 TAX -ADD -L3 SHAPE CHANHASSEN MN 55317-0026 3750 ARBORETUM BLVD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-3102 CHASKA MN 55318-9652 BONITA SPRINGS FL 34134-2502 3810 LONE CEDAR CIR MINNEAPOLIS MN 55455-0179 3675 ARBORETUM DR CHASKA MN 55318-9652 3800 LONE CEDAR CIR • 4 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2018-20 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 4, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard. The purpose of this hearing is to consider shoreland, wetland and front yard setback variances in order to build an accessory building (garage) on the lot located at 3790 Lone Cedar Lane and zoned Single Family Residential (RSF). Owner: Richard Moms A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the city's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2018-20 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. MacKenzie Walters Email: mwalters@.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1132 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on November 22, 2018) SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 11/05/2018 1:07 PM Receipt No. 00392702 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Richard Morris 0 3790 Lone Cedar Lane- Planning Case File No: 2018-20 ------------------------------------------------------- Variance 200.00 Sign Rent 200.00 Recording Fees 100.00 Vacation 300.00 GIS List 18.00 Total Cash Check 6570 Change SCANNFC 818.00 0.00 818.00 0.00 3790 Lone Cedar Lane - Planning Case File No. 2018-20 $300.00 Vacation of Easements/ROW $200.00 Variance $200.00 Notification Sign $18.00 Property Owners List (6 addresses x $3 each) $100.00 Escrow for recording variance documents $818.00 TOTAL $818.00 Check 6570 from Richard Morris $0.00 BALANCE OWED SCANNED r a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CHANHASSEN Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline Agency Review Request Date: Agency Review Response Deadline: Date Application Filed: November 5, 2018 November 19, 2018 November 2, 2018 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: MacKenzie Walters 952-227-1132 mwalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60 -Day Review Period Deadline: December 4, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. January 14, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. January 1, 2019 Application: Consider a variance in order to build an accessory building arae on lot. Planning Case: 2018-20 Web Page: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2018-20 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: Federal Agencies: Adiacent Cities: ❑ Attorney ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Chaska ® Building Official ❑ US Fish & Wildlife ❑ Eden Prairie ® Engineer ❑ Jackson Township ® Fire Marshal Watershed Districts: ❑ Minnetonka ® Forester ❑ Shorewood ® Park Director ❑ Carver County WMO ❑ Victoria ® Water Resources ❑ Lower MN River ❑ Law Enforcement ® Minnehaha Creek Adiacent Counties: ❑ Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Carver County Agencies: ❑ Hennepin Utilities: El Scott ElCommunity Development El Cable TV Mediacom — ❑ Engineer 9 ElElectricMinnesota Valley School Districts: — El Environmental Services ❑ Historical Society ❑ Electric — Xcel Energy ❑ Eastern Carver County 112 ❑ Parks ❑ Magellan Pipeline ❑ Minnetonka 276 ❑ Soil &Water Conservation District❑ Natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy ❑ Phone — CenturyLink Other Agencies: State Aaencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad ❑ Board of Water & Soil Resources Authority ❑ MN Landscape Arboretum ❑ Health ❑ Historical Society ❑ SouthWest Transit ❑ Natural Resources -Forestry ❑ TC&W Railroad ® Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control ❑ Transportation Cp NIT -J«' 1 r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT *CITi OF CHANHASSEN Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Dale:l I b PC Date: 0 I `( ( 1% CC Date: 1 1 r ( 14 60 -Day Review Date: Section 1: Application .-apply) (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment .........................$600 ❑ Create 3 lots or less.........................................$300 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ...... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Single -Family Residence.................................$325 ❑ Final Plat ..........................................................$700 ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 'Additional escrow may be required for other applications ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC) ........ $300 ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence..$325 Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 ❑ Single -Family Residence...............................$150 ❑ Rezoning (REZ) $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ......................................................$100 ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD)...................$750 $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................$100 ❑ All Others .........................................................$500 ❑ Sign Plan Review...................................................$150 ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Administrative ..................................................$100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts` ......................$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: ( thousand square feet) 'Include number of existin employees: 'Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts.........................................$500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_ units) ❑ Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Create 3 lots or less.........................................$300 ❑ Create over 3 lots ...................... $600 + $15 per lot ( lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots) ..................................$300 ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑ Final Plat ..........................................................$700 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)' 'Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC) ........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence...............................$150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ......................................................$100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) ................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ❑ Notification Sign (City to install and remove)....................................................................................................................... $200 Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting)...................................................$3 per address �1 (— addresses) py Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply).......................................................................$50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ® Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (2 deeds) ❑ Easements (_ easements) ❑ Deeds TOTAL FEE: Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: 19111 4''1 c cT Property Address or Location: 37 i0 LoN� CL-Dr4R2 Z 4Nc GfifsK4 / MN 53-3/8 Parcel #: ,257/7Crx�/0 ,oto Legal Description: Total Acreage: / 33 Wetlands Present? Present Zoning: 2�5 Present Land Use Designation: 5 2 Fe�2 Lal' Existing Use of Property: 5/NGLE n z -1 X Check box if separate narrative is attached. LoT / /y' LoC< / CE PvWL 0RES7- ®.Yes ❑ No .f Lor 2 /3LO c Requested Zoning: /ZE.S Requested Land Use Designation: 51 Coin3� a,i VrD a577aV.10, c or yA,c,4 ti Lor FrD ori 70cX)/ O ro e u� ei:.A� #-Ffm Go.v50L14i477o/1 of LOTS. APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Email: Signature: Contact: Phone: Cell: Fax: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: 12tC11*1ZD D..�?c�T42iS Address: 3-7fO ��F Ccs LSE City/State/Zip: C11K5K4 , MN S3-3/9' Email: iZrcK bM OP ct 4a4[ GO-" Contact: /Zi�K �✓loiz/Zl5 Phone: Cell: Fax: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. Signature: ( Date: PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Contact: Address: City/State/Zip: Email: Phone: Cell: Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: ❑ Property Owner Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑ Applicant Via: [:]Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑ Engineer Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. • DateReceived CARVER COUNTY Taxpayer Services Department Government Center - Administration Building 600 East 4th Street Chaska, MN 55318-2102 a' Phone (952) 361-1910 Fax(952)361-1919 Application to Combine Real Estate Parcels Per MN Statute 272.46 the county auditor, upon written application of any person, shall for property tax purposes only, combine legal descriptions of contiguous parcels to which the applicant(s) hold title. In order to be combined, the following requirements must be met: • Receipt of completed form by owner or designated representative • Based upon deeds of record, parcels must be of the same (identical) ownership • Parcels must be contiguous • Parcels must be located in same unique taxing districts (TAG) • Current year and delinquent taxes must be paid on each parcel • If parcels are in a Tax Increment Financing District (TIF), they must be located in the same TIF district • If special assessments are not paid on all parcels, the city/township would need to recertify the special assessments for the new parcel CAUTION Parcels that have been combined cannot be subdivided again without local municipality approval. If located in a township, Carver County Land Management Office must also approve the subdivision. Combined property tax will be reflected on next year's tax statement Owner (Applicant) Name: )C1c#4r-,N D1 ✓ orzfZ7 S I Address: 3790 LoAjEC-Co• iz-ZA) Phone Number: 65-1-�761 C1tx1 S l« i ✓'� n� 533% b' Parcels to be combined: .2 S/7a-x')/ D Prd .25-17 0-)o ;7 0 Signature: Date: For Office Use Only: Approved Denied By: Reason Denied: G: \PLAMForms\Administrative Subdivisions\Administrative subdivision Application to Combine Real Estate ParcelsAOC SCANNFD w Richard D Morris 3790 Lone Cedar Lane, Chaska, MN 55318 (City of Chanhassen) 651-261-4469 rickdm@uwalumni.com 11/2/2018 Mr. Bob Generous & City Planning Commission City of Chanhassen 191SA .T.iCf1 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Generous & City Planning Commission, On 9/28/2018, 1 purchased a home at 3750 Arboretum Blvd. within the city limits of Chanhassen. The City and I have since changed the address to 3790 Lone Cedar Lane to match the neighbors and facilitate emergency response and postal services. Two lots of record were in included in the sale. There is a 1981 single family home on PID 25700020. There is a vacant lot adjacent with PID 25700010. Both are on Lake Minnewashta's south side. A variance from the 100' wetland setback is requested from the city to allow the building of a 26' x 38.5' garage accessory building on the vacant lot. I've met with Mr. Bob Generous and Ms. Vanessa Strong regarding the project. Both the City Building Department and Water Resources staff support an accessory building as the optimal usage for this lot versus the alternative of another single-family home. As an official lot of record, a case could be made to build a house on this lot as an alternative to the accessory building proposal. To be a good steward of the lake and water resources, I will consolidate the two lots into one contingent upon approval of the variance, and thereby permanently remove the potential for another single-family home. I am requesting vacation of the drainage and utility easement. The City Engineer confirmed the easement is not used. Recording of the vacation will occur concurrently with the recording of the variance and consolidation of the lots. If another single-family home was built, it would result in more impact to the wetland and lake with another dock, erosion from usage, and riparian owner weed removal rights of 2500 square feet plus a 15' path of weed removal to clear water. Another house would also impact a city fire hydrant, the access road, and a drainage ditch. Lot 1 is zoned for a single-family home and a hardship of usage exists from the lot shape and lack of buildable space. Mr. Generous and City staff support waiving the 30' frontage setback to the proposed 17' setback to provide more spacing from the lake OHW mark. Instead of the 75' setback from the OHW mark, the proposed location is 71.8' for one corner as shown on the Site Plan. 99% of the building area satisfies the 75' lake setback and City Code Section 20-481. The previous (and currently website ordinance posted) OHW mark was 944.5', but it was recently changed to 945.9'. Your consideration and approval of this variance request for an accessory building with the condition of lot consolidation is appreciated. As noted above, this plan is supported by Water Resources and City Building Dept. staff. Respectfully submitted, Rick Morris • Richard D. Morris 3790 Lone Cedar Lane, Chaska,' 1\ 63318 (City of Chanhassen) 651-261-�69 rickdm�t mvalumni.com 11/2/2018 Mr. Bob Generous & City. Planning Commission City of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Bob Generous & City Planning Commission, 0 a On 9/28/2018,1 purchased a home at 3750 Arboretum Blvd within the city limits of Chanhassen The City and I have since changed the address to 3790 Lone Cedar Lane to match the neighbors and facilitate emergency response and postal services. Two lots, of record were included in the sale. There is a 1981 single family home on PID 25700020. There is a vacant lot adjacent with PID 25700010. Both are on Lake Minnewashta's south side. A variance from the 100' wetland setback is requested from the city to allow the building of a 26' x 38.5' garage accessory building on the vacant lot. I've met with Mr. Bob Generous and Ms. Vanessa Strong regarding the project. Both the City Building Department and Lake resources staff support an accessory building as the optimal usage for this lot versus the alternative of another single-family home. As an official lot of record, a case could be made to build a house on this lot as an alternative to the accessory building proposal. Provided the accessory building is approved, I am willing to consolidate the two lots into one, and thereby permanently remove the potential for another single-family home. If another single-family home was built, it would result in more impact to the wetland and lake with another dock, erosion from usage, and riparian owner weed removal rights of 2500 square feet plus a 15' path to clear water. Another house would also impact a city fire SCANNED r hydrant, the access road, and a drainage ditch. Lot 1 is zoned for a single-family home and a hardship of usage emsts from the lot shape and lack of buildable space. Mr. Generous notes that combining lots vacates the e)dsting 1(Y side lot setback between these two lots. He also supports waiving the 30' frontage setback to the proposed 17 setback to provide more spacing from the lake OHW mark. Instead of the 75' setback from the OHW mark, the proposed location is 71.8' for one comer as shown on the Site Plan 99% of the building area satisfies the 75' lake setback and City Code Section 20481. The previous (and currently website ordinance posted) OHW mark was 944.5, but it was recently changed to 945.9'. Your consideration and approval of this variance request for an accessory building with the condition of lot consolidation is appreciated. As noted above, this plan is supported by Lake Resources and City Building Dept staff. Respectfully submitted, Rick Morris 2 0 • ,Top 3inches nerved for recording data) WARRANTY DEED Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks Individual(s) to Individual(s) Form 10.1.1 (2016) e-CRV No.: :t - i(syK DEED TAX DUE: $2.560.80 DATE: September 28, 2018 FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Abraham C. Abbadao and Dorothy P. Abbariao, married to each other ("Grentor'l, hereby conveys and wartalits to Richard D. Moms ("Grantee"), as ❑ Tenants in Common (d mons than are Grantee is rwmed ahoaa and akherno bads checked (Check 0* one baq or boN boxes am cheated. Nis cwn ysr.:e is made to Ne nerved ❑ Joint Tenants Grantees as taaents in common.) real property in Carver County, Minnesota, legally described as follows: Legal description attached hereto and made a part hereof marked Exhibit "A" Check here if all or part of the described real property is Registered (forrans) ❑ together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, subject to the following exceptions: Check eppkcable box: B The Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. ❑ A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document or has been electronically filed. (If electronically filed, insert WDC number. ❑ 1 am familiar With the property described in this Instrument and I certify that the status and number of wells on the described real properly have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certtfcale. SCANNED Grantor /Abfeham C. Abberleo. Dorothy P. Abbariao 0 • PsW2 013 IVII nMBW Uniform Cone cind Blanks Form 10.1.1 State of Minn E��_ County of _ This instrurnent was acknowledged before me on t �" '-�! : by Abraham C. Abbanao and Dorothy P. Abbadao, married to each other. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Edina Realty Title, Inc. 6800 Franca Ave S, Suie 200 Edina, MN 55435 TAX STATEMENTS FOR THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE SENT TO: Richard D. Morris 3750 Arboretum Boulevard Chaska, MN 55318 _.. ...-....: .. y.. .:g •...-e., r.:a, ... :.��;. ... .. _ ��..t�.. :3 - P^:T�r ..rte... .•�1�rr ... i • Gage 3 of 3 Mmesota UmCc .cyawirg alarJct Form 19.1.1 EXHIBIT "A" Lots 1 and 2; Block 1, Cedar Crest Addition, Carver County. Minnesota ALTA COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE * ^ * Issued By Old Republic Title Insurance Company * NOTICE * IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE. COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY'S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old Republic Title Insurance Company, a Florida Corporation (the "Company"), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only whenthe.Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company's liability and obligation end. This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA ConunMnent for Tide Insurance. This Commitmenf is not valid without the Nofice; the Commihnent to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I— Requirements; and Schedule B, Part 11— Exceptions. Edina Realty Title, Inc. Authorized Officer or Agent OLD AEPURUC NArIONIIL TnU IMUNIX COMPANY ASW&C0npany 4WSetmdAmieSat$t Ubleap#4 MoreaNG EV? (612) 371-1111 (fy �� kasrdenT Attu .LJ � �� Secretary ORT Form 4690 8.1-16 1266543 ALTA Commihnem for TNe Insurance 0 • COMMITMENT CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS (a) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted.by the Public Records. (b) "Land": The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy. (c) "Mortgage": A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by - - electronic means authorized by law. - " (d) "Policy": Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment - (e) "Proposed Insured": Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment (f) "Proposed Policy AmounP: Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (g) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. - (h) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. T. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, this Commitment terminates and the Company's liability and obligation end. 3. The Company's liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without (a) the Notice; (b) the Commitment to Issue Policy; (c) the Commitment Conditions; (d)rSchedule A; (e) Schedule B, Part I -Requirements; (f) Schedule B, Part Il—Exceptions; and (g) a counter -signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form. 4. COMPANY'S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be Liable for any other amendment to this Commitment S. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY (a) The Company's liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company's delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from .the Proposed Insured's good faith reliance to: (i) comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; (ii) eliminate, with the Company's written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or (iii) acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment (b) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing. (c) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. (d) The Company's liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount This page is only part of a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Trt/e Insurance. This Commitment is not valid wBhouf the Notice, rhe Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Condbons; Schedule A, Schedule B, Pad I — Requirements; and Schedule B, Part 11— Exceptions. ORT Form 4690 8-1-16 1286543 ALTA Commdment fw TNe Insurance 0 • (e) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any. (f) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I— Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (g) In any event, the Company's liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy. 6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT (a) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment (b) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment (c) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. (d) The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (e) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company. (f) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company's only liability will be under the Policy. 7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company's agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company's agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. 8. PRO -FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro -forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro -forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro -forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is It a commitment to insure. 9. ARBITRATION The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at htto://www.alta. ora/arbitration. This page is only part of a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Tide Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions, Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I - Requirements, and Schedule B, Part II - Exceptions. ORT Form 4690 B-1-16 1286543 ALTA Commitment for TOe Insurance n u SCHEDULE A ALTA COMMITMENT 1.. Commitment Date: July 4, 2018 at 12:00 AM 2. Policy to be issued: (a) ALTA Homeowner's (02/03/10) Proposed Insured: Richard D. Morris, a single person Proposed Policy Amount $776,000.00 0 (b) ALTA Standard Loan Policy (6/17/06) Proposed Insured: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., its successors and/or assigns as their respective interests may appear. Proposed Policy Amount: $460,000.00 3. The estate or interest in the Land described or referred to in this Commitment is Fee Simple. 4. Title to the estate or interest in the Land is at the Commitment Date vested in. Abraham C. Abbariao and Dorothy P. Abbariao, as joint tenants 5. The Land is described as follows: J Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Cedar Crest Addition, Carver County, Minnesota Edina Realty Title, Inc. / Authorized Officer or Agent This page is only part of a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy the Commitment Contldlons; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I — Requirements,- and Schedule B, Part l/— Exceptions. ORT Form 4690 A 6/06 revised 8-1-16 1286543 Schedule A ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance 0 • SCHEDULE B -I ALTA COMMITMENT Requirements All of the following Requirements must be met. 1. The Proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. 2. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. 3. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. 4. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. 5. A deed from Abraham C. Abbariao and Dorothy P. Abbariao, married to each other to Richard D. Morris must be signed and recorded. 6. A mortgage from Richard D. Morris, a single person to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. in the amount of $460,000.00 must be signed and recorded. 7. Edina Realty Title's "Affidavit by Seller" or an affidavit of similar form must be signed at the closing. 8. Edina Realty Title's "Affidavit by Mortgagor" or an affidavit of similar form must be signed at the closing. 9. A completed Certificate of Real Estate value must accompany each deed or conveyance which is to be recorded. 10. VERIFY PRIOR TO CLOSING THAT THERE ARE NO UNPAID WATER/UTILITY CHARGES ON SUBJECT PROPERTY. 11. Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service requirements, Edina Realty Title requires that every seller in a real estate transaction fully complete and execute a "Certification for No Information Reporting on the Sale or Exchange of a Principal Residence." 12. A completed Well Disclosure Certificate must accompany each deed or conveyance which is to be recorded: or, the deed must certify that there are no wells on the property. For Well Certificate: Contact the Abstracting Department at 952-928-5234 for the %, V.., Section, Township, Range location information. 13. The following is for informational purposes only: If the buyers do not wish to purchase an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance, they must sign Edina Realty Title's "Notice of Availability of Owner's Tide Insurance" at the closing. If the gap period is to be insured, this transaction must be closed by Edina Realty Title. Copies of documents referenced in this commitment are available to review upon request. Please contact our Customer Service Department at 952-928-5200 if you would like a copy of a document. Informational Note: The property to be insured is Abstract Property. This page is only part o/ a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without rhe Notice, the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions, Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I - Requirements, and Schedule B, Part 11- Exceptions ORT Form 4690 B 16/06 revised 6-1-16 1266543 Schedule 8 1 ALTA Comment for Tide Insurance 0 SCHEDULE B-1 (Continued) If there are any questions concerning this Commitment, please contact our Customer Service Department at 952-928-5200. Commitment typed and examined by Sue Lehman on August 7, 2018. This page is only part of a 2016 ALTA Commitment for The Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy, the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part 1— Requirements, and Schedule B, Part 11— Exceptions ORT Form 4690 B 16/06 revised 8-1-16 T286543 Schedule B I ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance 0 • SCHEDULE B -II ALTA COMMITMENT Exceptions THIS COMMITMENT DOES NOT REPUBLISH ANY COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATIONCONTAINEDIN ANY DOCUMENT REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE SPECIFIC COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION VIOLATES STATE OR FEDERAL LAW BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN. The Policy will not insure against loss or damage resulting from the terms and provisions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and will include the following Exceptions unless cleared to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. A Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. D. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the Effective Date but prior to the date the Proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. E. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. F. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 2. The following exception will appear on an Owner's Policy to be issued: No coverage is given for unpaid utility and water bills, if any, which are not a lien on the subject property. 3. Taxes due and payable in the year 2018 in the amount of $630.00 are paid in full. First half taxes are due and payable on May 15th and second half taxes are due and payable on October 15th. The base tax amount is $630.00. - The real estate property ID or Plat and Parcel Number is 25-1700010. The 2018 taxes are homestead. No representation is made regarding subsequent years homestead tax status. Lot 1, Block 1 4. Taxes due and payable in the year 2018 in the amount of $10,094.00 are paid in full. First half taxes are due and payable on May 15th and second half taxes are due and payable on October 15th. The base tax amount is $10,064.00. The real estate property ID or Plat and Parcel Number is 25-1700020. The 2018 taxes are homestead. No representation is made regarding subsequent years' homestead tax status. Lot 2, Block 1 5. There are no pending or levied county or municipal assessments affecting the property as of the date of closing. No coverage is given for any pending or levied assessments which arise subsequent to the date of closing. 6. There is an easement for drainage and utility purposes over that part of the property as shown on the recorded plat. 7. Terms and conditions of License Agreement recorded as Document No. A589295. This page is only part or a 2016 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance This Commitment is not valid without the Notice, the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule 8, Pad I— Requirements; and Schedule B, Part ll— Exceptions. ORT Forth 4690 B 116/06 revised 8-1-16 1286543 Schedule B II ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance 0 SCHEDULE B -II (Continued) 8. Riparian rights are not insured by this policy. 0 9. No coverage is given for the rights of the United States of America and/or the State of Minnesota, the municipality and the public in and to that part of the land which may be within the bounds of a lake, river or wetlands. This page is only part o/ a 2016 ALTA Commitment /or Title Insurance. This Commitment is not valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy the Commitment Conditions, Schedule A. Schedule B, Part I — Requirements; and Schedule B, Part ll— Exceptions. ORT Form 4690 B 11 6/06 revised 8-1-16 1286543 Schedule B II ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance IL i' 0 4?EJVTEJ? BUIL gINss Design Summary Report Project: 06OA-15406-02-00 Oct 16, 2018 Description: Rick Morris 26x38' -3"x12 Chaska Customer: Rick Morris Market: SUBURBAN County: Carver Plant: 101 Version: 1.50.248 State: MN Price File: QP092018 BOM Version: 248 Note: The information presented in this report is based on a preliminary design using the input data provided. Actual building component types, grades and dimensions are subject to change per Lester Engineering design review. The final design will meet the loads specified below. Lester's Structural Warranty reflects these loads. Building Information Building Unit: 1 Description: Main Building Frost Depth (in): 48 Type: Uni-Frame Embedded Width: 26-0" Clear Height: 12'-0" (Bldg. Def.) Top Chord Slope: 4 / 12 Btm Chord Slope: 0 / 12 Length: 38'4" Eave Height: 13'-0" Soil Allowable Lateral Pressure (psf per It depth): 200 Roof System: Simple Gable SW Bay Spacing: 4@ 9'-7" Warranted Wind Speed (mph): 90.9 EWl Bay Spacing: 1@ 8'-9", 1@ 8'-3", 1@ T-0" EW2 Bay Spacing: 1@ 7-9", 1@ 1'-3", 1@ 8'-0", 1@ F-3", 1@ 7-9" Overhangs (in): S1=12 S2 =12 E1=12 E2 = 12 Diaphragm / Knee Braces: Use Diaphragm WITHOUT Knee Braces. Liner: Yes Ceiling: Yes Foundations Foundation Type: Poured Footing. floor Wall Width (in): N A for Embedded Building Frost Depth (in): 48 Grade to Top of Wall (in): N, A Floor Thickness (in): 4 Curb Height (in): N/A Anchor Type: Anchor Block Soil Allowable Bearing Pressure (psi): 3000 Concrete Strength (psi): 3000 Soil Allowable Lateral Pressure (psf per It depth): 200 Building Loads - Wind Building Code: IBC -2012 Risk Categor : 11 - General Use Wtnd Speed Type: Ultimate Wind Exposure: C Code Minimum Ultimate Wind Speed (mph): 115 Building Enclosure for Wind: Enclosed Equivalent Allowable Wind Speed (mph): 90.9 Wind Importance Factor: NA Design Ultimate Wind Speed (mph): 115 Estimated MRI Ultimate Wind : 900 E uivalent Allowable Wind Speed (mph): 90.9 Warranted Wind Speed (mph): 90.9 Building Loads—Snow Building Code: IBC -2012 Code Minimum Ground Snow Load (psi): 50 Design Ground Snow Load (psi): 50 Snow Importance Factor- 1 Design Uniform Roof Snow Load (psi): 33.3 Estimated MRI Ultimate Snow : 210 Snow Retention Trim Over Sl: No Snow Retention Trim Over S2: No This Warranty allows fora properly designed Snow Retention Trim to be installed on this building. SCANNED Building Loads —Gravity Roof Live Load (psf): 18.63 Truss Bottom Chord Load (psf): 5 Roof Dead Load : 4 Design Bottom Chord Braces for Ceiling Load: Yes Wall Dead Load (psf): 3 Roof Loads — Unbalanced Snow Loa WWd Load, Actual Dead Load Unbalanced Snow Load Wind Load (Perpendicular To Ridge) Wind Load (Parallel To Ridge) Windward (psi): 10 Windward (psi): -12.77 Windward (psf): -12.77 Leeward (psi): 33.3 Leeward (psf): -9.54 Leeward (psf): -8.07 Lee Surcharge (psi): 15.5 Components and Cladding (psi): 15.12 Lee Surcharge Length(ft): 6.05 Actual Roof + Ceiling Dead Load (psi): 3.54 Wall Loads— Wind Load Side Wall Pressure (psi): 10.28 Side Wall Suction (psi): -9.25 End Wall Pressure (psf): 10.28 End Wall Suction (psi): -9.25 Components and Cladding (psi): -17.47 Columns and Secondary Framing Material Truss ID j Description Shape Type Plies Spa S acin Member ID Component Locations Plies Lumber Length Spacing 01 Btm Chd Brace Cl 1 2x6 SPF No.2 9'-4 3/4" 5'-4 1/2" S1:CI Column Comer SLCI 8 2x6 Lester No.l 12'-6" 9'-3 7/8" S1:C5 (Typ) Column (Comer) S1:C5, S2:C1, S2:C5 1 F666 Lester No.l 12'-6" 9'-3 7/8" E1:C2 Column End E1:C2 1 F666 Lester No.1 15'-5" 8'-6" E2:C2 Column(End) E2:C2 1 F666 Lester No.] 15'-1 1/4" 9'-1 1/8" E2:C3 Column End E2:C3 1 F666 Lester No.l 15'-I 1/4" 9'-1 1/8" SLC2 (Typ) Column (Side) SL•C2 to S1:C4, S2:C2 to S2:C4 1 F666 Lester No.l 12'-6" 9'-7" FH:E1:D1 False Header E1:D1 1 2x6 Lester No.2 8'-1" 1'-0" FH:E2:D2 False Header E2:D2 1 2x6 Lester No.2 10'-41/2" F-0" PRI Purlin lush Rl 1 2x6 Lester No.l 10'-4 3/4" 2'4" PRI UnbSnow Purlin (Flush) RI 1 2x6 Lester No.1 10'-4 3/4" 1'-7" PR2 Purlin lush RI 1 2x6 Lester No.1 9'4" PR2 UnbSnow Purlin (Flush) RI 1 2x6 Lester No.1 9'4" GWS Wall Girt lush Sl S2 1 2x6 Lester No.2 9'-1" GW6 Wall Girt lush El, E2 1 2x6 Lester No.2 8'-3 1/2" Primary Framing - Trusses Truss Description Truss ID j Description Shape Type Plies Spa S acin Tl TR:26-00/1PITRUS/9OC/33-4-5/12- 1OH-12/P4/M63-FAN Triangular T63 -FAN 1 6'- 26'- 0 0 Geornetry and Bracing Truss ID Heel Height in LeftRight OH in OH in Top Chord Slope (/12)Sp Purhn acin in Bottom Chord Sloe /12 Bottom Chord Brace Spacing in Tl1 12 1 12 12 4 28 0 61 Truss Loads Truss ID Roof Snow Load ( st) Roof Live Load st) Roof Dead Load s Ceiling Dead Load sf) Weight (lb) Tl 33.3 18.63 14 Tl 1 160.13 Truss Material Truss ID Tl Location Top Chord Lumber Size / Sp ecies / Grade _ I 2x6 DFL/SYP M-23/2400 MSR 1.8E Tl Bottom Chord 2x6 Lester Premium Tl Web 2x4 LesterNo.2 Tl Slider _ 2x8 Lester No.l Foundations Description Column ID Location Material Volume Diameter x Thickness in Embedment Depth Quantity E1:C2 End Wall Poured 0.0436 CYD 18 x 8 4'-0" 1 E2:C2 End Wall Poured 0.0436 CYD 18 x 8 4'-0" 1 E2:C3 End Wall Poured 0.0436 CYD 18 x 8 4'-0" 1 S1:C1 Corner Poured 0.0776 CYD 24 x 8 4'-0" 1 S1:C2 Side Wall Poured 0.0776 CYD 24 x 8 4'-0" 6 S1:C5 T Comer Poured 0.0436 CYD 18 x 8 4'-0" 3 Concrete Total - Poured 0.805 CYD 13 0 • QEXTEJW BU/L©/NGS October 16, 2018 Rick Morris 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Chaska, MN 55318 Day Phone: 651-261-4469 Dear Rick Moms, Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with a quotation for a Lester Uni-Frame Embedded building. For your review, please see the enclosed proposal, which is based on our understanding of your building requirements up to this point. As you review it, please be assured that we understand new building projects always come with many decisions and a fair amount of stress! Our goal is to help make those decisions easier and reduce your stress with what we feel is our industry's most responsive and collaborative buying experience. Some other important factors set us apart and help us offer long-term customer satisfaction. For instance, the renowned quality and engineering standards of Lester buildings means you get the most value from your investment. In fact, with a solid reputation going back to 1947, Lester Buildings feature: • Unmatched design flexibility to meet your unique needs • Fast, cost-effective construction • Strong, straight and true structures, with excellent curb appeal • An industry-leading Lifetime Structural Design warranty Of course, we do our own part by providing full-service project planning and construction services. We do so with one goal in mind: to complete your project just as you envisioned it, in the agreed-upon time frame. Our team here at Lester Buildings LLC. stands ready to work with you and we look forward to your comments and questions. Thanks again and, as always, feel free to contact me anytime at 612-756-1395 orjwight@lesterbuildings.com. Respectfully Submitted, Jennifer Wight Territory Manager enc. SCANNED 0 • Attachment A Detailed Building Specifications for Rick Morris, 3750 Arboretum Blvd, Chaska, MN 55318 Budding Location Lester Buildings LLC. proposes to deli\ er. furnish and erect to industry standards the described building to the follo« ing location: Rick Morris, 3750 Arboretum Blvd. Chaska, MN 55318. Lester Structural System: Uni-Frame Embedded Width: 26'-0" Length: 38-4" Clear Height: 12'-0" Building Code: IBC -2012 End Use: Personal Use - Garage Risk Class: General Use Ground Snow Load (psf): 50 UniForm Roof Snow Load (psf): 33.3 Roof Dead Load (psf): 4 Truss Bottom Chord Load (psf): 5 Design Bottom Chord Braces for Ceiling Load: Yes This Warranty allows for a properly designed Snow Retention Trim to be installed on this building. Design Wind Speed (mph): 115 Ultimate Warranted Wind Speed (mph): 90.9 Exposure Category: C Quotation on a code clear span building system with columns embedded in the ground at 9'-7" OC and poured concrete footings. • 3 ply 2x6 sidewall columns • 1 ply truss 2x6/2x6 • Poured concrete footings Roof and Roof Accessories Material Uni-Rib 28ga steel- AZ50 SMP Insulation: None Sheathing: None Fasteners: Colored Screws Top Chord Slope: 4 / 12 Overhangs: 12" Overhang around perimeter of building Bottom Chord Slope: 0 / 12 Annex or Dormers: None Additional: 2x6 roof purlins pocketed in saddle hangers between trusses for a flush roof system Exterior Walls EWI EW2 SWl SW2 Panel Material: Uni-Rib 28 a Steel - AZ50 SMP Panel Material: Uni-Rib 28 a - AZ50 SMP Panel Material: Uni-Rib 28 a - AZ50 SMP Panel Material: Uni-Rib 28 a - AZ50 SMP Fasteners: Colored Screws Fasteners: Colored Screws Fasteners: Colored Screws Fasteners: Colored Screws Sheathing: None Sheathing: None Sheathing: None Sheathing: None Insulation: House Wrap Insulation: House Wrap Insulation: House Wrap Insulation: House Wrap Wainscot Material: Uni- Rib 28 a - AZ50 SMP Wainscot Material: Uni- Rib 28 a - AZ50 SMP Wainscot Material: Uni- Rib 28 a - AZ50 SMP Wainscot Material: Uni- Rib 28 a - AZ50 SMP Wainscot Insulation: House Wrap Wainscot Insulation: House Wrap Wainscot Insulation: House Wrap Wainscot Insulation: House Wrap Gable Material: None Gable Material: None Eave Material: None Eave Material: None Additional: 2x6 flush frame (bookshelf) wall girls at 24" OC. Wainscot at 36". 0 Interior Walls/Partition WalUCeilin E Openings Schedule EW2 SWI Additional Rib Material: Uni-Rib Material: Uni-Rib Overhead Door Opening - Custom / Custom Size (I6'wide x10'high) No overhead door included. 0 Liner 30ga-G40 Liner 30ga-G40 C p Pol Pol 1 FG Insulation: 6" FG Insulation: 6" FG (R- Insul Unfaced (R- Insul Unfaced (R- 19) 19 SW2 Ceiling Partition Wall Material: Uni-Rib Material: Uni-Rib Material: None Liner30ga-G40 Liner30ga-G40 Poly Poly Insulation: 6" FG Insulation: R-49 Insul Unfaced (R- Blown Cellulose 19) Attic Insulation Additional: Fully lined and insulated. Includes Attic access doors, blown attic insulation and vapor barrier. Exterior and interior finishes, require "surface mounted" electrical and plumbing fixtures and connections. Any holes cut into the final finish material will require a labor and material surcharge. Consult our salesperson for an estimate. Openings Schedule Refer to floor plan and or eleN ation draw ines. AJ Door and Windm%s Product Bulletin, and Openings Schedule Report for additional information. ID Quantity Type / Model / Size A I Overhead Door Opening - Custom / Custom Size (I6'wide x10'high) No overhead door included. B 3 Window - Commercial / Window Vinyl Slider Thermal Pane / 4'0" Wide x 3'0" High with color matched grids, insulation in the frames and removable screens C 1 WalkDoor - Commercial / WIk Door 7100 2206 Lite / 3'0"x6'8" with color matched gids, lever latches, door latch guard and deadbolt prep D 1 Overhead Door Opening - Custom / Custom Size (10'wide x IO'high) No overhead door included. Additional: No overhead doors included. Accessory Schedule Refer to Accessory Product Bulletins for additional information. IDuantit Tviae / Model / Size A 1 Rid eca - Metal / Rid eca - Metal / Rid ec - Vented B 2 Cupola - Louver / Square - Louver / 24" Louver- non-operating Additional: Continuous vented ridge full length of building. Additional Accessories Gutters: Sl: Gutter - F.B.O. S2: Gutter-F.B.O. Downspouts: Sl: 0 S2: 0 Snow Retention Trim: Sl: No S2: No Additional: RuMna Color Schedule Roof Colors Roof: Non-Cfg Shingles: Cupola Roof: Quaker Gra N/A Quaker Gra Eave Trim: Rake: Cupola Body: Quaker Gray Quaker Gray Snow White Gutter: Ridge Cap: Cupola Base: N/A Quaker Gray Quaker Gra Ridge Vent: N/A Wag Colon Exterior Walls: Wainscot: Ceiling Liner: Porch Roof: Pewter Gray Quaker Gray Liner White Quaker Gra Gable: Eave Finish: Wall Liner: Porch Column Covers: N/A N/A N/A Snow White Gable Lower: Accent: Porch Vblock: N/A N/A Snow White Insulated Wall Batten: Downspout: Porch Ceiling or Soffit: N/A N/A Snow White Soft: Snow White Openine & Trim Colors Base Trim: Overhead Door Panel: Signature Sldg. Door Dutch Dr. Insert: Snow White N/A Field: N/A N/A Corner: Overhead Door Jamb: Signature Sldg Trim: Dutch Dr. Frame: Snow White Snow White N/A N/A Sldg. Door Panel: Walk Door: Signature Sldg Jamb: Horse Stall: N/A Al White N/A N/A Sldg. Door Verticals: Walk Door Trim: Signature Sldg Window: Mansard Roof: N/A Snow White N/A N/A Sldg. Door Jamb: Window: Signature Sldg Track Mansard Fascia: N/A Hayfield White Cover: N/A N/A Siding Door Track Window Trim: Large Door Panel: Mansard Soffit: N/A Hayfield White N/A N/A Siding Door Bottom Girt: Shutters: Large Door Trim: Clear Opening Trim: N/A N/A N/A N/A Curtain Opening Trim: N/A Concrete Specifications Additional: No concrete Floor included. Attachment B Inclusion s/Exclusions Item Includes Excludes Site 2reparation X Fill and preparation needed for concrete grade heights X Lester building material package X Labor X Delivery X Builders risk insurance X General liability and workmans' comp. X Signed engineered drawings X Architectural stamp X Local building permits X Concrete and placement of concrete X Jobsite electricity X Final exterior landscaping - grading X Electrical hook-up of overhead doors X Interior finishing X Dum ster X Complete construction project debris placed in customer provided dum ster X Tax X Exclusions Note All items not specifically listed above or noted elsewhere are excluded from this proposal. The investment proposal assumes building site is prepared and level, with no underground obstructions, has easy and obtainable Tractor/Trailer access and has no other features that can inhibit efficient construction performance. Any delays or additional costs resulting from owner(s) or owner(s) agents negligence to or failure to comply with any part of this contract, or have not completed site preparation prior to start of construction will be charged extra material and labor according to Change Order Procedures and Schedules. Work Authorization No holds are applied to this project. It will be fully processed, produced, and delivered as scheduled. Total Building Investment $41 889.91 Includes 8% Promo discount through October 27, 2018 Note: This investment proposal is based on Lester Improv Project 060A-15406-02-00, and the Price File QP092218 that expires on Nov 10, 2018. Authorized this day of 120 By (Buyer Signature) Primed Name: By (TM Signature) Printed Name: m boa I i A E I Ki I j A • s, A3 FLOOR PLAN DEALER INFO. CUSTOMER INFO. BUILDING DESCRIPTION Customer Approval Bldg Direction PROJ: 060A-15406-02-00 PROPOSAL DRAWINGS ONLY Jennifer Wight Rick Morris 26'-0" x 38'-5" x 12'-0" NO Men".1, wxbudYmP,,,eeee• C LLwMNmpNrCBb1eLL,Xer pe4 JPG 25434 Cedar Lane 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Uni-Frame Embedded TI,eMo,mtlbn peeenleJ In p,M Ermi,pbbeu0 ona p,,,,,,,p„y,,,,�e y,bg,"e,",,,, „bw,eb. m.n"., n"wl•) DATE: New Prague, MN 56071 Chaska, MN 55318 QP092018 Oi1pn'..ubj. TTas SCALLO SCAUa a", ,.w.. NOT ' (M.N N ) boa I i A E I � I I j A N12 TBRG 0'-0' FLOOR �O�E 4W CLMBPG �- -0' GLM HOLE NDWALL E2 SECTION A4 19'd" FROM S1 n 19'4' EiLVE V n V 12'4' BRG 0'-0' FLOOR JJ" CUM B n V E'0' CLM NOLE S1 WIDEWALL S1 SECTION B4 20'-2" FROM E1 DEALER INFO. CUSTOMER INFO. BUILDING DESCRIPTION Customer Approval Bldg Direction PROJ: 060A-15406-02-00 Wight Rick Morris 26'-0" x 38'-5" x 12'-0"�A.y PROPOSAL DRAWINGS ONLY B°„"1w. Ar « ...".�m°n.. ESTERJennifer 25434 Cedar Lane 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Uni-Frame Embedded — 7 T1s 1n1 tlonn 1°'"'"1°""'mS.A°an° T -1 BULL OLNOS New Prague, MN 56071 Chaska, MN 55318 OP092018 1xnwN1 DATE: ,.,,,, NA., a:.". w�'.nm".:aw"i.un..1.d Hr •BOTTOSCRLE- 0 • n C LL 2 tt w C H U I N C Z J S EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: Lot f. Bock 1, CEDAR CREST, Carver Count,. Minnesata. (P LD NO. 251700010) Lot 2. Block 1. CEDAR CREST, Carver Goody. Minnesota (P.I D NO 251700020) PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 0- 2, Black 1. CEDAR CREST Carver Counly. Minnemota_ I kw+4Y � MY tlu sMY rm Peys�s] N' rre a iiCr my6eCfa�uprrWNBrlmre Uly lmnvG PmM1amral tmes,,.+w„a..maw..amasr des m.. 2903 1N3a16 Sh vIUM Livres Ab, T.— PROD #1623-00 BENCHMARK: Top of 5G1 cdoindn spike at CPlb. 2 EN.U. = 951.35 (NAVD88) Lot Consolidation warr er -for - Rick Morris 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Chaska, MN 55318 0 20 60 SCANNED PREMIER LAND SURVEYING. LLC 1800 Arboretum BhL.. Suite 202 VictoNs, UN 553!6 952J Jktf0 LEGEND • Found Iron Monument Set 11T x Whither marked 0 with Cap number 22703 d Fine HyOmnt e Surrey Conlml Point x Spot Elevation A Survey Conbol Pant — Contour 1 -she SCANNED PREMIER LAND SURVEYING. LLC 1800 Arboretum BhL.. Suite 202 VictoNs, UN 553!6 952J Jktf0 Accessory Structure Site Plan -for - Rick Morris 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Chaska, MN 55318 1 .\ EDGEDFWEr LAND ASAI EDBY SOIL INVESTIGATION .l�AND DESIGN, 0SAI9.H0 i g ', �• \ 1, .A �m \ F° `�p\-�,,-___ ,, ,, r , • ••SOT F' EXISTING LEGALDESCR/PTIONS:� --'' �` ---'.s f ;- ' r---------------/ Cpm ABnneBbck f. CEDAR CREST. Carver- / ---_ - - - _-------- I ♦ 1 1 I S \ _____ ) v \ V T l \ IIMOY a.erymtae m.wY.nYi+aa'al q'm+>uW BENCHMARK: myaaie.pwwm ae6w Ia,,,eybxevM.mr ToP o/60tl mmmon.%Wke INSaysYsursrbe bars d6. 5Nb �Li..sob. al CP No. 2. !*�Y- \*r •- 22M3 IM140 Elevation = 951.35 (NAVD88) sbran v. bw ua.. en Or. PROJ.. A1Q2 Survey Contras paint da I LEGEND I • Fm Iran Monument Sal l2• X le mbar mar a INU cap number 22703 O R. H,d.M a Survey Contras paint x Spot Ebvaeon e Su.Y G.W pwl _ _ (:onlou! Lire STgTF NEp<r<,"E\\ VO Df NO S/q E Eq(Y \ SCANNED 0REMIER LAND SURVEYING, LLC 1600 Ar6orebm B ... Suife 23 VIe10Na, MN 36186 Y52J 10 aoi'tinva to of murver for - Rick Morris 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Chaska, MN 55318 9 Wr:*ND EDGE OF WET LAND QAS DELINEATED BY \\ SOIL INVESTIGATION / \ AND DESIGN, 05/09/18 V X9y36 / \ S o X 95 6 MINIMUM SETBACKS: C) FRONT. • 30' SIDE: 10, `.) WETLAND: 100' y� O.H.W. 75' 44yOScgarNG z / N \ DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Lot 1, Block 1, CEDAR CREST, Carver o / l? County, Minnesota. mX o yA' N+ X9h1� u' �i' \ r> ar' ga %\ e'9R o� /R'p0 x Sea ` fn o < ' / \ \ t 3g4c 4 ti /q gyp! zR 11*c 3 y� � C' ` tp 1.04E / \^\ `�� `\ Q� k�\/) fCJ� ICE_ FD,gR 9^c4C4m �9 �\aoFq \ �t 0 \ o t o \ 4F x9539 \TSFT xON 100. Ab OFF " S 953 \ O \ co�BsoMe. �Fl�ANo 3 x 95,x \ �'i°6 WE TIAND \ c IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: � �mtii 95' \ \ PROPOSED POLE BARN: 1000 S.F. PROPOSED DRIVEWAY. < 912 S.F.\_ EXISTING DRIVEWAY: 30 S.F. \ \ S?Bp Op \ TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: < 1942 S.F. � 'SSB p23j, �\ SOUS. \\ LOT AREA: 15,135 S.F. IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE. < 12.6 % ,7 _ ' �O NOR RC y<l NFO' .4OT! \ \ \ I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under S ST97Fy�'G y `\ my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 4p S NFOc \ Steven V. Ische Traverse PC 22703 10/11/18 License No. Date REVISED: 10/16/18 -POLE BARN PROD. #1623-00 LEGEND • Found Iron Monument Set 1/2" X 14" rebar marked o with cap number 22703 b Fire Hydrant o Survey Control Point X Spot Elevation OREMIER LAND SURVEYING, LLC 1600 Arboretum Blvd., Suite 203 Victoria, MN 55386 952-443-3010 Cortfirsamto of Warver for - Abraham Abbariao ' A, ^s`OD ., 59 WE4 \LgN O � \ .i xqq'' / \ MINIMUM SETBACKS: FRONT. 30' SIDE: 10' WETLAND: 100' O.H.W. 75' DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY. Lot 1, Block 1, CEDAR CREST, Carver County, Minnesota. <ON F G,Foq�4 �9 1\ A, (J / C.) yro / x qy►9 La�.�sQgPiy o/ c / h / / / x 409 i \ 100'OFFSETO �� WETLAND q G x �' A Q1. x 001 EDGE OF WET LAND AS DELINEATED BY SOIL INVESTIGATION AND DESIGN, 05/09/18 \ \ 5% \ NG \ \ L \ x 44i x q`'1.' 9 \ NF CCZC, l ` x qlp \ - ' C'r x S,3" GQ, - e \ o7�re � q4p. cv� B9�`er I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 22703 05111118 Steven V. Ische License No. Date .'.Wl a ri gg13x qe'\ \ WETLAND \\ O \ Srq pF s68�0?3�, /�so�ryF \\ F R�FOFC \\ Np O� r \ O NOTE: BASED ON THE MINIMUM F SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, THIS PROPERTY CONTAINS 0.0 SQUARE \ FEET OF BUILD -ABLE AREA. — — PROJ. #1580-00 OREMIER LAND SURVEYING, LLC 1600 Arboretum Blvd., Suite 203 Victoria, MN 55386 952-443-3010 LEGEND • Found Iron Monument Set 1/2" X 14" rebar marked o with cap number 22703 � Fire Hydrant A Survey Control Point X Spot Elevation OREMIER LAND SURVEYING, LLC 1600 Arboretum Blvd., Suite 203 Victoria, MN 55386 952-443-3010 ~sr R- Accessory Structure Site Plan -for - Rick Morris 3790 Lone Cedar Lane Chaska, MN 55318 \ y / \ O,V'FF�L \ �a9nGN 40, A14 ' / 1,✓w � N\ -`fir �Sw �j�� $ _ NkOSE�`\` \`` `♦ ` \ ` W EDGEOFLAND }�`` `�\.\ AS DELINEATED BY : SOIL INVESTIGATION AI. ` \ °\ e i ' �\ ```'4 ` 1�\\ `♦♦ r AND DESIGN, DSNW18 ok JF / , ♦\I ♦ E • `t ♦\� \413/ ♦ \\;.\\\ \ !" 10 31\1 x 16p \\ r,\t\r'\ `V^ %mss \. o'o� EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS:1 "/47F----------- / .' p•t't \ l ld` \ Lots l and 2. BbrA 1, CEDAR CREST, Cave. `-- I / C..W,, divwaafa. .� / _----_ _—_--_.__ s � S�'1 j� � FRLrv'1'F OFG C9 WETLAND 41 Gl/y D>T Np 'ARF~FACY NO 8L/ryF O' In.,eyenrymr6/,ew.y,.,o„re.,uq.,,,,om„ps, BENCHMARK: .,ys.u.y.wtnra41rl..,4Y/ay®e8me•aW W Top o/600 carvrron apke Irdsrmp.uwn,sn°d6"Sr°dIi"�cs of CP No. 2. �Y� 1w' � 22M 'wins Elevation= 950.35 (NAVD88) 8rw” v Lien» Now Ow PRQI 411623-00 Fm ll~ 0 N b WREMIER LAND SURVEYING. LLC 1600 ANO Wrn Blvd., Saha 203 Vl.r ' AIN 55386 952J 3010 LEGEND • FwMlron MWiUmenl o SM1?X14'rebar mamked xi1M1 cap mpn5er 12TQ'1 d Fm ll~ o Surrey Conb POMC x Soot Elavmon o Surrey cwt of Pant - Contour line WREMIER LAND SURVEYING. LLC 1600 ANO Wrn Blvd., Saha 203 Vl.r ' AIN 55386 952J 3010 Premier 3750 Arboretum Blvd Chanhassen, MN Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Premier Land Surveying LLC 1600 Arboretum Blvd, Ste 203, Victoria, MN Soil Investigation & Design, Inc. 2809 78" Ave. N. Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 Date: May 22, 2018 SCANNED 7 WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY • The site at 3750 Arboretum Blvd Chanhassen, MN was inspected on May 10, 2018 for the presence and extent of wetland. • The NWI map showed one wetland complex within site boundaries: PEM1C. • The entire site was inspected. No other wetlands exist. Please refer to the NWI and "area to be delineated" figures. • The soil survey mapped showed Fill materials. • The DNR Protected Waters Map showed Protected Water(s) within site boundaries. • One wetland was found on the site. We were retained to delineate the wetland area(s) within site boundaries as summarized below. Wetland Circular 39 Cowardiu Wetland Plant Community Type 404 Jurisdictional ID ers and Reed Observations Type PEMIC Wetland 1 is connected 1 2 Fresh water emergent to Lake Minnewashta. I. INTRODUCTION The site was examined on May 10, 2018 for the presence and extent of wetland. The property is located in Sec 8, Twp. 116N, R23 W, City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota. The property was located at 3070 Arboretum Blvd Chanhassen, MN (Figure I), and corresponded to Carver County PID: 251700020. The site has no structures on it. The property consisted primarily of deciduous woodland in upland portions and wetlands of varying vegetative cover in lowland areas (Figure 2). Site topography consists of a small flat wetland area adjacent to slopes that can exceed 20 percent. Adjacent land use is mixed use to the north is a lake, to the east is wetland and residential, to the west is residential, and south is the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, METHODS Wetlands were identified using Routine Determination methodology described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region Version 2.0) as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper -most extent of wetlands, which met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland -upland boundaries were marked with pink pin flags. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at representative locations along the wetland - upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30 -foot radius for trees and vines, 15 -foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5 -foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type being sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 32 inches (unless otherwise noted) utilizing Munsell Soil Color Charts and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used in reporting are from the NTCHS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Version 7, 2010) which are commonly found in the Midwest. Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2012 National Wetland Plant List (Lichvar, R.W. and Kartesz, J.T. 2009. North American Digital Flora: National Wetland Plant List, version 2.4.0 (https://wetland_plants.usace.anny.mil). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, and BONAP, Chapel Hill, NC.) III. RESULTS Review of NWI, Soils. and DNR Information The AN DNR Revised National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI) (http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/) one PEM1C wetland exists on the site and extends to the north and east. (See Figures 2 and 3) The Soil Survey of Carver County, Minnesota (hgp://www.nrcs.usda.gov/) showed the following soil types within site boundaries (Figure 4). Essex Sandy Loam (see attached soil Report) The DNR Protected Waters Map, Carver County (http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/) showed one DNR Protected Water(s) within site boundaries (Figure 3). Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were evaluated in greater detail during field observations on May 10, 2018. One wetland was identified and delineated on the site (Figure 5). Corresponding data forms are included as Appendix A. The following description of wetland and adjacent upland reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. At that time, vegetation was actively growing and had not yet begun to senesce. Wetland hydrology was assumed to be normal for that date based on the 30 -day rolling precipitation total (Appendix B). A survey of the wetland boundaries will be provided after delineation review is completed. Wetland 1 was a Type 2 (PEM IC) freshwater emergent meadow. Vegetation throughout this wetland complex varied from Green Ash, Stinging Nettles and Creeping Charlie to Box elder and shallow open water. Wetland soils were muck changing to a loam. Adjacent upland was comprised of a variable canopy of Green Ash, Bluegrass and Creeping Charlie. The delineated boundary followed a change in vegetation composition and a change in topography. Wetland 1 did not correspond to NWI-mapped PEMtC wetland. Other Areas No other areas were shown as wetland on the NW I map. No other areas were mapped with hydric soil by the soil survey, and no other depressional areas dominated by a hydrophytic plant community were observed on the site. V. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the COE 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Both the delineation and report were conducted in compliance with regulatory standards in place at the time the work was completed. All site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Report completed by: Paul J. Brandt PSS Delineation completed by: Paul J. Brandt PSS I hereby certify that this plan, document, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Soil Scientist under the Laws of the state of Minnesota. Print Name: Paul J. Brandt PSS Signature: Date: May 22.2018 License # 30007 . Appendices Figures: Figure 1— Site Detail Map Figure 2 — NWI Detail Map Figure 3 — DNR Protected Waters OMap Figure 4 — Soils Map Figure 5 - Delineated Wetlands Map : A 44 F} Soil Investigation & Design. Inc. 2809 78th Ave. r Brooklyn Park. Mn 55444 pbrandttu soilin%c tigations." 651-260-3783 r S Figure 1: Site Detail Map Client: Premier Land Surveying 3750 Arboretum Blvd, Chanhassren, MN Soil Investigation R Design. Inc. 2809 78th Ave. N Brooklyn Park. Mn 55444 pbnndt(q soilinvestigations.os 651-260-3783 Figure 2: NWI Detail Map Client: Premier Land Surveying 3750 Arboretum Blvd, Chanhassren, MN LEGEND x a r� Y ✓ Figure 3: Public Water Basins Map Soil Investigation & Design. Inc. 2809 78th h Ave. N Brooklyn Park, Mn551�W Client: Premier Land Surveying pItnindtfu wilinvestigationcus 651460- 651-260-3783 3750 Arboretum Blvd, Chanhassren, MN Site soils are composed of fill materials, some horizon development noted. Figure 4: Site Soils Map_ Soil Investigation & Design. Im. - - - o4Ave.BrClient: Premier Land Surveying Brooklynlyn Park. Mn 554-WY g pbrandrsilincestigatiuns.us 651-?60-3737R3 3750 Arboretum Chanhassen, MN YR. q _ Soil Investigation & [�csiea Inc. Figure 2: NWI Detail Map- - - 2809 78th re Brooklyn Park. Mn 53444 Client: Premier Land Surveying Pbmndt651-260-378 inv�stigatiuns.us 3750 Arboretum Blvd Chanhassren, MN 651-260-3783 � Soil Investigation & Design. Inc. 2809 78th Ave. N Brooklyn Park. Mn 55444 Pbrandlpl sailinccstigations.us 651-260-3783 Figure 3: Public Water Basins Map Client: Premier Land Surveying 3750 Arboretum Blvd, Chanhassren, MN Site soils are composed of fill materials, some horizon development noted Figure 4: Site Soils Map 2R097R Soil Investigation &Design. Inc. ." BrClient: Premier Land Surveying Brooklyn TurParkk. Mn 554U pbnnd0usoilincestigarions.us 651-260-3783 3750 Arboretum Chanhassen, MN 4 3 11 -for- Abraham Abbariao MAVMOYSETRACKS: Frsoxr av SC£ f0 MtMm 190' oxw rs WSCMPnON OFPROMTY: � f. em 1. rsoA6 caEsr, dk 2 /i \ e gi°n • E06EOF w1:IU (( S aF1xIEAt 1 son wvEs.wArron �, / PNOOEbIW, py°y1B ° wnm+.smm Irx W4, MN 55366 e j .✓ w �y Y F x 69•e.,Ym Spq� � aye •/� \\ ror: tasen ox rNEMMY1lY � S +sem et �� sE-rucx aEoumEa6Nr4 nc 'ws`'h Ba0nEmrcaxrAYs •.9sWAaE "'f•�'•!y, rEFr ai NA.PxBLEAREA fXp/ MSLpS 4 3 LEo>gm e gi°n • raua `m r..m 309 )ti Aw. N Bw+mxlr•e.m.re °i°d"'Pak"'N""' ° wnm+.smm Irx W4, MN 55366 e a. al•.E 9ha6,a+o6�ve... . e E�wca•wwx x 69•e.,Ym Base Drawing by:. e gi°n 309 )ti Aw. N Premier LandSurveyingLLC °i°d"'Pak"'N""' 7600 Ar6oreNm alvtl, SuM 763 �YO611-16031p Irx W4, MN 55366 652403-3010.......... 9ha6,a+o6�ve... . Y 1 Figure 5: Wetland Delineation ECr PR ff LaW Sl ymg 3750 Arb6n:tum Blvd. Chenhassm MN 1 Appendix A: Data Forms WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Absolute Project/Site 3750 Arboretum Blvd (PID: 251700020) City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: May 10, 2018 Applicant/Owner: State: Minnesota Sampling Point: Pt 3 UP Investigator(s): Paul Brandt lection, Township, Range: Sec 8, Twp 116N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace (fill) Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear Linear Slope (%): 8 tat: 44.866144 Long: -93.616278 Datum: Number of Dominant Species Soil Map Unit Name Fill JWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? (If no, explain in remarks) Y Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" that are OBL. FACW, or FAC: 3 Are vegetation , soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Si1MMARV AF rrunrun_c - - pi neeueu, explain any answers In remarxs.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum . (Plot size: Basal 10 ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsyfvanica 70 Y FACW that are OBL. FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) 4 5 Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 70 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratun (Plot size: ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Alnus incana 40 Y FACW Total % Cover of. OBL species 0 x 1= 0 2 Acer negundo 40 Y FAC 3 FACW species 110 x2= 220 FAC species 40 x3= 120 FACU species 0 x4= 0 UPL species 0 x5= 0 4 5 80 =Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: ) Column totals 150 (A) 340 (B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.27 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% 5 6 X Prevalence index is 53.0' — 7 Morphogicai adaptations' (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 _separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' (explain) 0 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: ) — 1 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Samolino Point w 1 i is Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Primo Indicators (minimum of one is requiredcheck all that apply) (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc"' Texture Remarks 0 to 6 10YR 3/3 100 _Surface Soil Cracks (86) s (10) Silt Loam Fill from Road 6 to 18 10YR 4/4 100 Drainage Patterns Silt Loam Fill from Road 18 to 32 1 OYR 4/4 50 1 oYR 4/6 & 4/1 50 D M Silt Loam Fill from Road DepoBI)sits Deposits (82) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living on L Crayfish Burrows (C8) —Sediment Drift Deposits Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (84) rust _Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Posi ion (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7 (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) 'Type. C = ConD = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining. M = Matr atcentration. Hydric Soil Indicors: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (At) Gleyed Matrix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Sandy _ Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) _Black Histic (A3) Matrix (S6) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) _Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Stripped _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2) Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _Very Other (explain in remarks) _2 cm Muck (A10) _ Matrix (F3) _ _Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) _Depleted Dark Surface (F6) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Mucky Mineral (S1) _Redox Depleted Dark Surface (F7) `Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand _Sandy cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _ Redox Depressions (F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or —5 problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type. Depth (inches). Hydric soil present? N ' Remarks: Obvious fill from adjacent sources HYDROL ory Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primo Indicators (minimum of one is requiredcheck all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) _Aquatic Fauna (B13) _Surface Soil Cracks (86) s (10) Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (814) Drainage Patterns Water Marks _ Hydrogen Sulfidehizosp Odor _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) DepoBI)sits Deposits (82) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living on L Crayfish Burrows (C8) —Sediment Drift Deposits Roots (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (84) rust _Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Posi ion (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7 (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) —Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes Saturation present? No X Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Yes (includes capillary fringe) No X Depth (inches): hydrology present? N Describe recorded data (stream gauge. monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). H available: Rema ks. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region - Prevalence Index Worksheet ProjecUSite 3750 Arboretum Blvd (PID: 251700020) City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: May 10, 2018 Applicant/Owner: FACW species 110 x2= 220 Investigator(s): Paul Brandt State: Minnesota Sampling Point: Pt 3 WET Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace lection, Township, Range: Sec 8, Twp 116N, R23W (fill) Slope (%): 8 Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear Linear Lar. 44,866144 Long: -93.616278 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name Fill Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators - JWI Classification : Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this PEM1C time Are vegetation of the year? (If no, explain in remarks) soil , or hydrology Are vegetation significantly disturbed? "normal circumstances" , soilAre or hydrology SUMMARY OF FtWntNroe naturally problematic? present? til' needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here of in a separate report.) Absolute Dominan Tree Stratum (Plot size: Basal 10 ) % Cover t Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 70 Y 2 3 4 5 Saolind/Sh .h strap n (Piot size: ) 1 Alnus incana 2Acernegundo 3 4 5 Herb stratum 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 Woody vine ctrat m 1 2 photo (Plot size: ) (Plot size: ) 70 =Total Cover Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Staus Number of Dominant Species FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A(B) 0 =Total Cover 0 =Total Cover here or on a separate sheet) —Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% X Prevalence index is 53.0• Morphogical adaptations' (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a _separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* _(explain) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hytlmloo must be Present, unless disturbed or problematic vegetation present? Y -- „y — pb ur engineers - Prevalence Index Worksheet 40 Y FACW Total % Cover of: 40 Y FAC OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 110 x2= 220 FAC species 40 x3= 120 FACU species 0 x4= 0 BO =Total Cover UPL species 0 x5= 0 Column totals 150 (A) 340 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.27 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators - 0 =Total Cover 0 =Total Cover here or on a separate sheet) —Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% X Prevalence index is 53.0• Morphogical adaptations' (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a _separate sheet) Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* _(explain) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hytlmloo must be Present, unless disturbed or problematic vegetation present? Y -- „y — pb ur engineers SOIL Samnlinn Pninf: o, Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) DepthMatrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type` Loc' Texture Remarks 0 to 32 N 2/0 100 Sift Loam Fill from Road Secondary Indicators (minimum of two uired Surface Water (A7) High Water Table (A2) —True Aquatic Fauna (813) _Surface Soil Cracks (86) X Saturation (A3) Aquatic Plants (B14) Drainage Patterns (810) X Water Marks Hydrogen Sulfide Odor —Dry -Season Water Table (C2) X Sediment Deposits (62) DepoBl)sits Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living on L _Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits Roots (C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) rust _Presence Algal Mat or Crust (B4) of Reduced Iron (C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants lot) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils "Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matra, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Ma ' Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _Histisol (All _Sandy Gleyed Matra (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) _Black Histic (A3) _Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Stratified Layers (AS) _ Loamy Gleyed Matra (F2) Other (explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck (At 0) _ Depleted Matra (F3) _ _Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _Redox Dark Surface (F6) - _Thick Dark Surface (Al2)_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wettand _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _Redox Depressions (F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): (C6) Muck Surface (C7) FAG -Neutral Test (D5) Type: Depth (inches). T� Hydric soil present? Y Remarks: (Explain in Remarks) Obvious fill from adjacent sources, bottom of ditch HYDRnI nr:v Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators !minimum of one is reeuired7 check all that aoolvl X Secondary Indicators (minimum of two uired Surface Water (A7) High Water Table (A2) —True Aquatic Fauna (813) _Surface Soil Cracks (86) X Saturation (A3) Aquatic Plants (B14) Drainage Patterns (810) X Water Marks Hydrogen Sulfide Odor —Dry -Season Water Table (C2) X Sediment Deposits (62) DepoBl)sits Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living on L _Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits Roots (C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) rust _Presence Algal Mat or Crust (B4) of Reduced Iron (C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants lot) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils _Geomorphic Position (D2) X Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) —Thin (C6) Muck Surface (C7) FAG -Neutral Test (D5) X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) —Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observation.. Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No Saturation present? --R—Depth (inches): __T__ Indicators of wetland Yes No (includes capillary fringe) Depth (inches): hydrology present? Y Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: emarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Reeion WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Absolute Project(Site 3750 Arboretum Blvd (PID: 251700020) City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: May 10, 2018 Applicant/Owner: State: Minnesota Sampling Point: Pt 3 UP Investigator(s): Paul Brandt iection, Township, Range: Sec 8, Twp 116N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace (fill) Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear Linear Slope (%): 8 Let: 44.866144 Long: -93.616278 Datum : 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica nit Soil Map UName Fill JWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatidhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? (If no, explain in remarks) that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances" Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? C1111xe1 Aev �r r present? - ----- -- - —• • •^—••••-� (r needed, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) -- uoo-relook names of plants. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: Basal 10 ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 70 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 70 =Total Cover Saolina/Shrub stratun (Plot size: ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Alnus incana 40 Y FACW Total % Cover of: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 110 x2= 220 FAC species 0 x 3 = 0 2 3 4 5 FACU spades 0 x4= 0 UPL species 0 x5= 0 40 =Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: ) Column totals 110 (A) 220 (B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.00 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation X Dominance test is >50% X Prevalence index is 53.0' 4 5 6 7 Morphogical adaptations' (provide 8 9 supporting data in Remarks or on a - separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' (explain) 0 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: ) 1 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. unless disturbed or problematic 2 ydrophytic vegetatlon 0 =Total Cover Present? Y Remarks: (Indude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Samolina Point: w z i ro Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (mist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc" Texture Remarks 0 to 6 10YR 3/3 100 Silt Loam Fill from Road 6 to 18 10YR 4/4 100 Surface Water (At) Sift Loam Fill from Road 18 to 32 10YR 4/4 50 10YR 4/6 8 411 50 D M Silt Loam Fill from Road _Aquatic Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Patterns (BI 0) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B7) _True _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _Drainage Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (8 2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (83) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sols _Stunted Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) 'Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Maim Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) _Black Histic (A3) _Stripped Matrix (S6) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matra (F2) Other (explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matra (F3) — Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _ Dark Surface (F6) —Gauge or Well Data (D9) _Thick Dark Surface (Al2)_ _Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) —5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _Redox Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _Redox Depressions (F8) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wehand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Restrictive Layer (H observed): Feld Obse.vatlons: _ Type: Depth (inches): Surface water present? Yes Hydric soil present? N Remarks: Water table present? Yes No --37– Depth (inches): Obvious fill from adjacent sources Saturation present? Yes No —=Depth (inches): 4iVflDl'11 M_v (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is Mguire& check all that apply) Secondary Indicators minimum of two required) Surface Water (At) Fauna (B13) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) _Aquatic Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Patterns (BI 0) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B7) _True _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _Drainage Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (8 2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (83) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) or Stressed Plants (D1) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sols _Stunted Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) _Geomorphic FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) —Gauge or Well Data (D9) Water -Stained Leaves (B 9) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Feld Obse.vatlons: _ Surface water present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table present? Yes No --37– Depth (inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No —=Depth (inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), H available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region IIIV IIOIIIGJ VI pldnl5. Project/Site 3750 Arboretum Blvd (PID: 251700020) City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: May 10, 2018 Applicant/Owner: State: Minnesota Sampling Point: Pt 3 WET Investigator(sy Paul Brandt iection, Township, Range: Sec 8, Twp 116N, R23W Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace (fill) Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear Linear Slope (%): 8 Let 44,866144 Long: -93.616278 Datum: (Plot size: Basal 10 ) Soil Map Unit Name Fill 4WI Classification PEM1C Are climatidhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? (If no, explain in remarks) 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica _ Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances"Are Y FACW vegetation soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? R1 IMMADV nC nunrun_c -------- pr neeaeu, explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hyddc soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) 111= !CT.'.I Lt Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate street) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region IIIV IIOIIIGJ VI pldnl5. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: Basal 10 ) % Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 70 Y FACW that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 70 =Total Cover Saolina/Shrub stratun (Plot size: ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total %Cover of: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 70 x2= 140 FAC species 0 x3= 0 2 3 4 5 FACU species 0 x4= 0 UPL species 0 X5= 0 0 =Total Cover Herb stratum (Plot size: ) Column totals 70 (A) 140 (B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.00 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 4 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is s3.0' — 7 Morphogical adaptations' (provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 _separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation' (explain) 0 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum (Plot size: ) — 1 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrdopy must be present, unless disiurbed w problematic 2 Hydrophytic vegetation 0 = Total Cover pint? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate street) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland Delineation Precipitation Data Retrieval http://ciimateapps.dnr.state.mn.us/gridded_data/precip/wedandlwetland. 1974 0.07 1.18 0.86 1.26 3.35 6.011 1.39 3.80 1.10 2.03 1.41 0.55 15.6 23.01 24.01 1973 0.82 0.60 1.60 1.47 2.00 1.83 2.76 4.80 3.17 0.97 2.83 1.19 14.56 24.04 23.67 1972 0.79 0.24 1.09 1.26 3.66 3.53 6.22 2.84 3.55 1.84 1.07 1.71 19.80 27.80 32.53 1971 0.74 1.66 2.15 1.34 4.50 5.05 3.91 1.55 2.91 5.75 3.01 0.59 17.92 33.16 33.62 1970 0.31 0.08 1.20 3.40 5.77 3.23 4.76 2.32 3.521 5.41 3.96 0.44 19.60 34.40 30.08 1969 2.27 0.47 0.82 1.81 2.22 3.50 3.50 0.45 0.41 2.48 0.97 2.04 10.08 20.94 23.43 1968 0.56 0.09 1.43 3.74 4.28 8.79 6.26 0.56 4.55 5.77F0.62 1.59 24. 38.24 31.96 1967 2.08 0.85 0.80 3.21 1.53 7.79 1.80 3.52 0.83 1.31 0.36 15.47 24.11 27.20 1966 048 1.63 161 1.11 1.60 3.36 1.58 4.80 2.29 3.36 1.05 13.63 23.25 23.311965 0.19 1.56 3.43 400 6.69 3.55 6.77 3.18 6.15 1.39 1.63 26. 40.37 38.06 1964 0.150.03 0.74 3.29 3.66 3.58 2.90 6.18 4.36 0.39 0.971 20.68 27.43 27.16 1963 0.36 0.34 1.02 2.16 4.09 4.16 2.45 1.35 2.92 0.97 0.61 0.69 14.97 21.12 20.63 1962 0.41 1.23 1.16 1.10 7.03 1.93 6.18 3.97 2.85 1.16 0.49 0.13 21.96 27.64 32.20 1961 0.15 0.44 1.66 2.19 5.19 0.91 5.11 1.99 4.06 2.88 2.45 1.01 17.26 28.04 23.86 1960 0.57 0.10L1.45 3.37 7.19 2.83 3.67 4.6 3.86 0.40 1.31 0.45 22.15 29.13 31.39 1959 0.07 0.25 0.58 6.43 4.80 3.49 6.61 2.24 2.65 0.39 1.38 23.57 29.14 27.08 1958 0.23 0.15 2.18 2.68 3.32 2.55 3.35 1.53 1.57 0.69 0.10 13.43 18.63 19.56 Jan Feb Apr May -408- Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WAR ANN WAT 1957 0.28 1.09 1.15 8-42 5.92 7.54 3.02 1.44 1.57 0.28 28.98 36.09 35.99 1956 0.69 0.12 0.84 2.87 8.99 5.271 5.73 0.661 1.561 1.56 0.071 23.52 29.81 29.83 1955 0.48 1.51 0.58 1.07 0.75 2.04 8.931 3.00 1.481 1.371 0.69 1.151 16.20 23.05 22.43 1954 0.16 0.54 1.51 3.94 3.39 6.06 3.80 3.19 4.08 1.83 0.51 025 20.52 29.26 30.40 1953 0.95 1.41 1.45 2.94 3.31 7.83 5.42 3.37 0.46 0.31 2.02 1.40 20.39 30.87 28.51 1952 0.96 1.11 3.09 0.74 3.19 4.80 6.09 4.50 0.37 0.00 0.98 0.39 48.95 26.22 28.99 1951 0.48 1.46 3.13 2.03 4.48 5.77 7.98 3.801 5.55 1.57 1.26 1.31 27.58 38.821 38.2 1950 1.17 0.43 2.53 1.4 4.10 1.68 3.47 1.56 1.85 1.09 1.00 1.48 12.66 21.841 21.84 1949 2.02 0.193.11 1.76 1.43 3.81 6.67 1.24 2.77 2.12 0.48 0.97 15.92 26.57 26.80 1948 0.14 1.82 1.35 1.43 0.89 3.30 2.47 5.63 1.08 0.91 2.271 0.62 13.37 21.91 22.95 1947 0.68 0.24 0.45 2.84 2.68 5.23 1.89 3.22 2.21 1.06 3.29 0.49 15.23 24.28 25.28 1946 0.57 1.12 1.66 0.87 3.80 4.76 2.06 0.64 5.30 2.92 2.13 0.79 16.56 26.62 24.03 1945 0.69 1.81 1.96 3.17 3.21 6.97 3.54 3.76 2.12 0.39 1.42 1.44 19.60 30.48 30.06 1944 0.54 1.23 1.24 2.69 5.68 7.73 4.83 3.17 1.22 0.17 2.45 0.21 22.63 31.16 31.69 1943 1.11 0.66 1.20 0.80 6.26 5.03 6.51 2.12 1.71 1.65 1.71 0.00 21.63 28.76 27.56 1942 0.10 0.34 2.54 3.4 8.11 3.00 2.67 3.871 8.091 0.83 0.33 1.00 25.74 34.35 38.7 1941 0.50 1.12 0.86 3. 4.86 4.93 2.66 2.54 4.23 4.53 1.27 0.71 19.22 31.29 31.55 1940 0.250.65 1.66 1.20 2.08 7.05 1.69 5.75 0.53 2.56 3.30 0.91 17.1 27.63 22.91 1939 0.93 1.13 0.56 2.73 2.88 8.57 2.67 4.72 2.70 1.45 0.01 0.591 21.54 28.94 30.51 1938 0.48 0.80 2.09 3.94 7.83 4.81 5.19 3.37 4,281 0.61 2.10 0.91 25.481 36.41 35.63 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep I Oct Nov Dec 1.10 046 1.16 2.54 7.43 3.10 0.72 3.56 1.63 1.82 0.48 0.541936 093 1.4 2.90 1.38 2.61 1.71 0.51 2.36 1.02 0.58 0.65 2.021935 WANN1937 1.39 0.24 1.66 2.20 3.65 6.17 2.56 3.55 1.52 3.83 0.78 1.01 1934 0.88 0.18 0.67 1.00 0.33 3.17 2.70 2.72 4.74 3.73 1.951 0.98 13.66 23.051 18.70 1933 0.61 0.79 2.08 1.44 6.50 1.23 2.03 1.45 3.18 1.11 0.47 0.73 14.39 21.62 24.37 1932 1.52 0.74 1.36 2.92 2.97 3.22 4.49 3.52 0.87 1.12 2.66 1.28 15.07 26.67 28.58 1931 0.09 0.76 1.65 1.04 1.59 4.05 0.66 4.43 2.88 2.38 3.83 0.76 13.61 24.12 20.83 1930 1.34 1.89 0.61 0.64 3.82 4.60 1.981 1.301 4.56 1.13 2.43 0.12 16.26 24.42 24.54 1929 1.79 1.16 1.23 2.18 1.37 3.48 2.821 2.94 4.55 2.46 0.70 0.64 15.16 25.32 25.36 1928 0.49 1.73 0.96 2.951 2.11 3.151 3.921 5.201 2.461 2.92 0.38 0.54 16.84 26.81 30.33 SOIL Samolino Point. Pr z Wn T Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moisq % Type` Loc" Texture Remarks 0 to 32 N 2/0 100 Silt Loam Fill Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) X SurfaceWater(A1) Aquatic Fauna (613) Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) X Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) _Surface _Drainage Patterns (B10) X Water Marks (Bt) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) r Ta X Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots —Crayfish _Crayfish Burrows B Deposits (C3) Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Alga Algal Mat or Crust (B9) rust _Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils 'Type: C =Concentration, D = Depletion. RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location. PL = Pore Lining, M = Matr Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol (At) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) _Black Histic (A3) _Stripped Matra (S6) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (explain in remarks) 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1, _Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _Redox Dark Surface (F6) _Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present. unless disturbed of problematic Restrictive Layer (if observed): —Gauge or Well Data (139) Type: Depth (inches) (Explain in Remarks) Hydric soil present? Y Remarks _Other Obvious fill from adjacent sources, No Depth (inches). HYnRnI nr_v No Depth (inches). Indicators of wetland Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required. check all that aooly) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) X SurfaceWater(A1) Aquatic Fauna (613) Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) X Saturation (A3) True Aquatic Plants (B14) _Surface _Drainage Patterns (B10) X Water Marks (Bt) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) r Ta X Sediment Deposits (B2) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots —Crayfish _Crayfish Burrows B Deposits (C3) Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Alga Algal Mat or Crust (B9) rust _Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position (D2) X Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC -Neutral Test (DS) 37 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) —Gauge or Well Data (139) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: _Other Surface water present? Yes X No Depth (inches). Water table present? Yes X Saturation No Depth (inches). Indicators of wetland present? Yes X (includes capillary fringe) No Depth (inches): hydrology present? Y Describe recorded data (stream gauge. monitoring wellaerial photos. previous inspections). If available. Rema ks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Appendix B: Precipitation Data Wetland Delineation Precipitation Data Retrieval http:(iclimateapps.dnr.state.mn.us/gridded_data/prccip/wetiand/wetland. 1927 0.69 0.62 2.95 3.06 4.42 5.80 1.71 1.921 4.351 2.35 1.621 3.391 18.20 32.881 30.13 1926 1.28 0.60 1.48 0.71 1.58 3.431 2.12 3.401 5.791 1.51 1.85 1.25 16.32 25.001 22.70 1925 0.73 0.67 0.44 1.28 2.48 6.151 5.74 0.721 3.821 0.77 0.63 0.91 18.91 24.341 24.52 1924 0.55 0.76 2.17 4.43 1.38 5.901 2.00 9.961 3.761 0.69 0.58 1.22 23.00 33.401 32.65 1923 1.31 0.56 1.34 2.56 2.57 6.46 2.97 2-701 1.291 0.84 0.38 0.52 15.99 23.50 27.15 1922 0.90 3.171.78 1.65 2.50 3.61 1.60 1.6 2.261 1.35 3.84 0.20 11.66 24.55 22.06 1921 0.52 0.75 2.17 1.83 3.44 4.11 4.13 1.931 4.101 0.58 1.96 0.36 17.71 25.88 28.30 1920 1.71 0.49 2.92 2.30 2.24 6.65 1.85 1.89 2.48 2.78 1.381 1.161 15.11 27.85 28.23 1919 0.51 2.64 0.82 3.44 1.94 5.42 6.26 2.091 1.301 2.03 2.82 0.851 17.01 30.12 33.63 1918 0.65 0.62 1.14 1.34 5.06 2.311 3.47 4.561 1.381 3.12 4.18 1.911 16.78 29.74 23.20 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep I Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WAT 1917 2.66 0.65 2.80 1.72 3.63 3.371 3.38 2.96 2.051 1.98 0.07 0.62 15.39 25.89 26.24 1916 3.03 0.34 1.44 2.44 6.451 6.33 2.84 2.46 2.63 1.61 0.41 1.00 20.71 30.98 34.60 1915 1.45 2.15 1.23 1.83 &341 5.20 5.69 3.80 2.56 2.44 3.74 0.46 22.59 35.89 31.74 1914 0.86 0.70 1.59 3.28 2.22 8.50 1.67 6.42 2.87 1.73 0.121 0.64 21.68 30.60 31.50 1913 0.31 0.70 1.28 1.88 2.81 3.14 7.08 1.99 4.33 2.33 1.03 0.03 19.35 26.91 26.00 1912 0.69 0.22 0.33 2.20 3.87 1.51 5.65 5.541 1.49 0.80 0.071 1.61 18.06 23.981 31.74 1911 1.07 0.96 0.80 2.25 3.34 5.82 4.24 3.461 4.31 6.88 1-031 2.331 21.17 36.49 28.09 1910 1.34 0.55 0.07 0.92 1.62 1.29 1.07 1.841 1.901 0.96 0.491 &391 7.72 12.44 17.50 1909 2.26 2.62 0.21 1.92 3.67 3.99 3.27 2.651 4.431 1.41 2.90 2.59 18.01 31.92 30.02 1908 0.63 1.08 1.48 3.55 7.51 7.07 2.54 0.861 3.58 2.43 1.29 1.28 21.56 33.30 31.66 1907 1.32 0.91 0.93 1.32 2.63 5.28 3.40 5.53 4.251 1.78 0.89 0.69 21.09 28.93 31.15 1906 1.44 0.39 1.22 1.96 9.10 3.52 3.08 7.29 4.33 2.14 2.50 0.94 27.32 37.91 38.11 1905 1.12 0.84 1.07 0.86 4.62 8.25 2.71 4.52 5.061 2.97 2.70 0.11 25.16 34.831 35.56 1904 0.95 1.29 1.51 2.18 2.54 4.01 3.84 5.21 2.69 6.96 0.11 0.44 18.29 30.731 29.74 1903 0.32 0.56 1.98 3.13 5.14 1.65 4.10 4.56 7.18 4.12 0.371 1.031 22.63 34.141 34.95 1902 0.57 0.85 0.4 2.95 4.37 3.04 7.43 4.44 3.99 1.65 1.70 2.98 23.27 34.44 30.75 1901 0.41 0.48 1.85 1.14 1.56 5.96 2.15 1.56 4.98 0.73 1.12 0.79 16.21 22.731 28.22 1900 0.51 0.86 1.65 1.95 0.28 0.65 6.58 4.8 8.33 6.85 0.72 0.56 20.72 33.821 30.29 1899 0.70 1.14 2.41 0.69 2.92 5.57 1.48 3.291 1.41 3.59 0.36 0.65 14.67 24.21 26.89 1898 0.02 1.59 1.93 1.26 5.18 2.73 2.17 3.13 1.201 5.97 1.22 0.09 14.41 26.49 21.91 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WAT 1897 1.83 0.85 3.37 1.29 1 4 6.49 5.27 2.31 2.16 1.74 0.80 .0.16 17.37 27.41 33.68 1896 0.85 -108--6-58 0.20 3.33 5.72 3.26 3.37 0.67 3.91 2.15 4.06 4.181 0.731 13.36 32.43 24.60 1895 0.49 1.53 2.30 2.08 2. 1.97 4.57 0.09 0.98 OW1 13.91 18.73 22.60 1894 1.30 0.04 2.825-09 2.87 1.28 0.61 0.81 1.89 3.02 0.55 1.44 7.46 21.721 21.96 1893 L 1.48 1.85 2.29 5.44 2.45 1.63 2.42 4.14 1.81 2.07 0.74 2.44 12.45 28.76 24.94 1892 0.08 1.77 1.10 1.3 5.95 7.26 9.26 5.41 1.72 0.13 0.63 0.67 29.60 35.28 39.55 1891 0.771 1.721 1.67 2.12 1.50 3.46 2.78 2.94 1.58 1.59 0.89 3.22 12.26 24.24 Wetland Delineation Precipitation Data Retrieval httpc' iel imateapps.dnr.state. mn.us/gridded_data/precip/wetland/wetland Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home I current conditions I journal I past data I summaries I agriculture I other sites about us Wetland Delineation Precipitation Data Retrieval from a Gridded Database Obtaining a long-term precipitation data time -series for wetland delineation efforts can be a difficult and time-consuming process. Locating the nearest precipitation monitoring station to the wetland often proves challenging. Once a nearby monitoring location is identified, retrieving the data, accounting for gaps in the record, and generating the summary statistics can provide further challenges. By offering access to "synthetic" data, this application assists users in overcoming some the challenges inherent in assembling a precipitation data set. The synthetic data are made up of regularly -spaced grid nodes whose values were calculated using data interpolated from Minnesota's outstanding, but spatially and temporally irregular, precipitation data base. Click to learn more about Precipitation Grids. select a wetland location Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Carver township number: 116N township name: Lake range number: Minnewashta 23W nearest community: section number: Hazeltine 8 To create a precipitation documentation worksheet using the three -prior -month (NRCS) method, select the date of the site visit or aerial photograph and click on "create worksheet". 2018 May 22 create worksheet precipitation totals are in inches color key: total is in lowest 30th percentile of the period-of-recor'i multi -month totals: distribution WARM = warm season (May thru September) total is => 30th and <= 70th percentile ANN = calendar year (January thru December) total is in highest 30th percentile of the period -of -record WAT = water year (Oct. previous year thru Sep. present distribution year) A'R' following a monthly total indicates a nmvicinnni val,,n da.o.. A s... . ,,__ �_. - -.___ _�._-._._.._.._._��....... ....... .oa a.-..oacu amuu arca. Periodof-Record Summary Statistics Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WAT 30% 0.48 0.48 1.10 1.44 2.53 3.37 2.53 2.72 1.90 1.12 0.69 0.56 16.21 26.15 25.48 70% 1.04 1.09 1.81 2.90 4.30 5.45 4.50 4.53 4.00 2.58 1.85 1.26 21.22 31.52 31.68 mean 0.85 0.86 1.54 2.35 3.67 4.49 3.82 3.74 3.04 2.17 1.46 0.98 18.75 28.96 28.99 1981-2010 Summary Statistics Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju! Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WAR ANN WAT 3040 0.39 0.44 1.15 1.98 2.62 3.40 2.71 2.96 2.34 1.06 0.98 0.63 17.11 29.07 27.85 Wetland Delineation Precipitation Data Retrieval http://climateapps.dnr.state.mn.us/gridded_data/precip/wetland/wetland 70% 1 1.11 0.81 1-971 2.801 3.961 5.11 4.05 5.231 4.291 3.211 1.921 1.42 21.46 32.20 33.32 mean 0.831 0.701 1.63 2.54 3.42 4.28 4.06 4.24 3.42 2.361 1.71 1.09 19.43 30.28 30.10 Year -to -Year Data Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WAT 2017 0.67 0.74 0.65 4.32 5.681 3.61 4.37 7.671 1.95 5.28 0.28 0.68 23.28 35.90 37.00 2016 031 1.09 1.23 2.96 1.991 4.09 5.69 10.341 4.93 3.34 1.85 2.15 27.04 39.97 42.04 2015 0.36 0.34 0.82 1.93 4.451 3.91 7.94 2.99 3.35 2.73 4.87 1.81 22.64 35.50 29.24 2014 1.17 1.50 0.70 6.76 5.37 11.71 3.58 3.73 1.97 1.42 0.79 0.94 26.36 39.64 41.98 2013 0.60 0.99 1.50 4.92 5.82 6.16 5.13 1.46 1.41 3.67 0.47 1.35 19.98 33.48 31.57 2012 0.48 2.17 1.33 2.68 10.431 5.011 2.85 2.17 0.47 1.44 0.74 1,401 20.93 31.17 29.31 2011 0.94 1.29 1.46 2.71 4.40 3.38 5.29 3.27 0.29 0.88 0.20 0.64 16.63 24.75 29.77 2010 0.76 0.89 1.13 2.94 2.891 4.301 3.93 6.60 5.60 1.89 1.68 3.17 23.32 35.78 38.27 2009 0.59 1.07 2.13 1.51 O.60 3.091 1.67 8.801 1.65 6.71 0.65 1.87 15.81 30.341 25.60 2008 0.18 0.46 2.09 3.61 2.76 4.37 3.91 2.82 2.63 1.45 1.61 1.43 16.49 27.32 28.99 2007 1.10 1.01 3.36 1.85 2.93 1.12 1.90 6.38 5.02 4.42 0 14 1.60 17.35 30.83 2887 2006 0.68 0.44 1.22 3.81 2.36 3.92 0.85 5.05 4.98 0.64 1.34 2.22 17.16 27.51 31.27 2005 1.12 0.83 1.04 2.59 3.35 6.47 2.68 3.88 8.51 4.57 1.88 1.51 24.89 38.43 34.20 2004 u.34 1.30 2.36 2.48 7.45 6.22 4.25 1.75 4.58 2.43 0.93 0.37 24.25 34.46 33.31 2003 0.29 0.80 1.49 2.36 5.26 3.56 2.72 0.74 278 0.80 1.14 0.64 15.06 22.58 23.79 2002 0.42 0.58 1.61 2.74 3.03 7.65 4.77 8.351 3.95 3.44 0.06 0.29 27.75 36.89 37.43 2001 1.28 1.67 0.95 6.33 4.60 4.63 1.82 2.871 3.17 0.77 2.92 0.64 17.09 31.651 33.43 2000 1.02 1.28 1.16 1.11 4.17 3.69 3.84 3.381 0.73 0.92 3.80 1.39 15.81 26.491 22.43 1999 2.08 0.45 1.64 2.90 6.40 5.12 3.79 3.77 2.46 0.81 1.00 0.24 21.54 30.66 32.88 1998 1.37 0.72 3.00 1 _7 4.74 5.10 3.28 4.91 1.06 2.44 1.181 0.651 19.09 29.82 28.36 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec I WARM ANN WAT 1997 1.76 0.25 1.33 109 1.43 3.GP 9.65 5.49 3.57 1.72 0.74 0 3 23.25 30.49 37.96 1996 2.24 0.15 1.45 0.67 3.58 3.98 1.45 1.68 1.43 3.65 5.11 1.52 12.12 26.91 24.77 1995 0.50 0.31 2.40 2.65 3.53 276 4.03 6.20 2.18 5.57 1.15 1.42 18.70 32.70 30.76 1994 1.29 0.77 0.38 4.82 2.16 3.20 4.09 4.25 4.82 4.12 1.48 0.60 18.52 31.98 29.56 1993 1.12 0.39 1.11 2.16 4.28 6.19 6.85 6.06 3.02 0.89 2.02 0.87 26.40 34.96 36.43 1992 0.82 0.44 0.92 1.63 1.82 3.67 5.48 3.85 3.54 1.88 2.07 1.30 18.36 27.42 29.60 1991 0.24 0.66 2.17 2.95 6.57 3.49 5.30 2.024434 1.68 4.93 0.82 25.80 39.25 34.74 1990 0.05 0.58 3.05 2.04 3.75 8.73 9.87 1.451.56 0.70 0.66 26.13 34.77 33.29 1989 0 31 0.59 1.80 2.64 3.94 3.86 3.80 2.990.47 0.75 0.22 16.08 22 86 24,71 1988 0.99 0.20 1.20 0.99 1.67 0.22 1. 5 4.310.60 2.12 0.57 10.55 "7.22 1 33 1987 0.36 0.01 0.38 0.08 1.99 182 11.70 2.760.66 1.85 054 19.83 23.71 2228 1985 0.94 0.79 1 31 5.51 216 5.63 3.87 3.601.12 0.43 0.07 20.00 30.17 34.56 1985 0.40 0.36 1.90 3.10 2.73 2.44 239 5.59 5.27 3.40 1.26 1.35 18.42 30.19 30.66 1984 0.43 1.20 0.93 2.72 2.96 7.22 3.38 5.12 2.75 4.58 0.29 1.61 21.43 33.19 33.33 1983 0.36 0.59 2.60 2.50 3.89 4.43 3.31 3.15 2.34 2.07 3.62 0.93 17.12 29.79 32.06 1982 1.82 0.17 1.92 2.14 4.02 1.67 2.06 2.89 4.16 3.13 2.80 2.96 14.80 29.74 25.79 1981 J 16 1.93 0.84 2.76 1.67 6.74 3.38 6.59 1.38 2.51 1.51T -O921 19.76 30.391 26.65 1980 0.57 0.62 0.88 0.75 2.01 5.06 2.35 4.251 3.36 0.81 0-261 0.131 17.03 21.05 24.17 1979 1.03 1.37 2.77 1.00 3.86 4.81 2.47 5.711 1.90 3.26 0.811 0251 18.75 29.24 27.58 1978 0.23 0.26 0.61 4.11 4.08 4.79 6.12 5.24 3.391 0.36 1.28 1.021 23.62 31.49 34.82 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WAR ANN WAT 1977 0.58 1.08 3.85 2.67 4.15 3.85 4.53 7.73 4.20 3.44 1.46 1.09;24.46 38.63 33.67 1976 0.86 0.46 2.22 0.84 1.61 3.02 2.40 1.69 2.63 0.49 0.10 0.44.35 16.76 19.37 1975 3.08 0.63 1.49 4.11 3.72 7.03 2.40 292 1.73 0.50 2.61 0.53.80 30.75 31.10