Loading...
CAS-20_RETURNED EXECUTED SITE PLAN AGREEMENT(reserved j'or ret ording information) PERMANENT DRAINAGE, UTILITY, AND ROADWAY EASEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this day of A, gg- 2004, by and between Dan Russ, as Personal Representative of Westwood Community Church, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as "City". WITNESSETH: The Grantor, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration to them in hand paid by the City, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant unto the City, its successors and assigns, a permanent easement for public drainage, utility, and roadway purposes, over, on, across, under, and through the land situated in the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibit WN TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the some, unto the City, its successors and assigns, commencing upon execution of this agreement, together with the right of ingress 1 to and egress from the property, for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, repairing, and maintaining the property of the City, at the will of the City, its successors and assigns; it being the intention of the parties hereto that the Grantor hereby grant the uses herein specified without divesting themselves of the right to use and enjoy the above described permanent easement premises, subject only to the right of the City to use the same for the purposes herein expressed. It is understood by the Grantor that the City shall not be responsible for any restoration or replacement costs or damages resulting from the construction, maintenance, and use of the easement premises. It is further understood that vegetation will be removed and that excavation will occur on the easement premises. The above named Grantor, their successors, heirs, and assigns, do covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that they are well seized in fee title of the above described easement premises; that they have the sole right to grant and convey the easement to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the easement premises; and that they will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this agreement the day and year first above written. GRANTOR: Dan Russ, as Personal Representative of Westwood Community Church (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF Carver ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN C BY: Tho s A. Fu o AND To6d Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this31S1 day of 2004, by Dan Russ, as Personal Representative of Westwood Co ` unity Church. N ARY PUBLIC ENOta-j Plr' ;T""'J';GSTATE OF MINNESOTA ) Fc.:- v;! •-sofa mission FxOires Jan 31, 2001 Ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this . I+h day of ►- 2004, by Thomas A. Furlong and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the'Mayor and City Manager of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. N ARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 SRN:ms 3 KIM T. MELrMSSEN NOIarYPublic-AUnna m EXHIBIT `A" TO PERMANENT EASEMENT As easement for roadway and drainage and utility purposes lying over, under and across all that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 9 and Government Lot 8 of Section 8, all in Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota lying south of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast comer of ZIlvINNIERMAN FARM IST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 19 minutes 14 seconds West, along the east line of said Z MIVIERMAN FARM IST ADDITION, to the intersection with a line lying 85.50 feet northerly of, as measured at right angles to, and parallel with the south line of said Government Lot 8 and to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes 46 seconds East, along said parallel line a distance of 447.43 feet to the intersection with a line lying 85.50 feet northerly of as measured at right angles to, and parallel with the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 32 minutes 52 seconds East, along said parallel line, a distance of 993.36 feet, thence northeasterly, a distance of 17.07 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the north, having a central angle of 05 degrees 29 minutes 35 seconds and a radius of 178.00 feet; thence North 84 degrees 57 minutes 32 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 157.85 feet; thence southeasterly, a distance of 106.29 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a central angle of 22 degrees 23 minutes 26 seconds and a radius of 272.00 feet; thence South 72 degrees 39 minutes 02 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 30.24 feet to the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and there terminating. i Descript" )n Sketch for: WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHL ZCH 1 Inch = 200 Feet J" r�, U VWI r w 0 r. Co a � uwi w 0 w ' M z N~ 00 w O F OJ \ O Zen J� C : z w W� « w 0 << C] ww W w <� r _z J 0 W Lim F- O W z J `- V) O Z 3 i I A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF GOVT LOT 8-, i SE CORNER OF ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION_ N89'40'46"E 447.43 __ \ _ o ,S LINE OF GOVT LOT 8, SEC. 8 ** * PIONEER * eA **** 1104049503.DWG I JMM N89'40'46"E 447.00 U 0 R Hats J` eO�r J J R;� N PROPOSED ROADWAY ANDm> rj ;'DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 1f A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH so LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 8 _9'32 _ 993.36 _117 ;N8 57 5 1 58 '52"E 3 "� _ SE CORNER OF GOVT LOT 8, SEC. 8 S89'32'52"E S LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 9 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (651) 681-1914 FAX:681-9486 625 Highway 10 N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 (763) 783-1680 FAX -783-1a83 1303.09 SE CORNER OF THE NW 1/4," OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 9 R O (n w 0 a PROPOSED ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT An easement for roadway and drainage and utility purposes lying over, under and across all that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 9 and Government Lot 8 of Section 8, all in Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota lying south of the following described line: RV FSO �—— G' "EJTTI STR"£3 � r1 0 Commencing at the southeast corner of ZIMMERMAN FARM IST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 19 minutes 14 seconds West, along the east line of said ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION, to the intersection with a line lying 85.50 feet northerly of, as measured at right angles to, and parallel with the south line of said Government Lot 8 and to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes 46 seconds East, along said parallel line, a distance of 447.43 feet to the intersection with a line lying 85.50 feet northerly of, as measured at right angles to, and parallel with the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 32 minutes 52 seconds East, along said parallel line, a distance of 993.36 feet, thence :northeasterly, a distance of 17.07 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the north, havina a central angle of 05 degrees 29 minutes 35 seconds and a radius of 178.00 feet; thence North 84 degrees 57 minutes 32 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 157.85 feet; thence southeasterly, a distance of 106.29 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a central angle of 22 degrees 23 minutes 26 seconds and a radius of 272.00 feet; thence South 72 degrees 39 minutes 02 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 30.24 feet to the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and there terminating. THIS SKETCH DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENTS FROM OR ONTO THE HEREON DESCRIBED LAND, EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS WHICH AFFECT SAID LAND OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID LAND. WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMIN OTA, DATED THIS 29TH DAY /JULY. 2004. SIG{ED: IONEER ENGINEERING, P t By. John C. Larson, Professional Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 19828 1ndnAQ nA-1 AR Descript" )n Sketch for: WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHL ;CH 1 Inch = 200 Feet 9-) �. PROPOSED ROADWAY AND �0 % NNS wN° Oo mp 'DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT , p.tP-0 ° �^° 1 fA LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH , —LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 157.85 58932'52"E 993.36 _ �!\;N84-57'322 E _ n � W 3 (/1 �W I1 N EZ m N�F W O Of oa 0 Z `- N D_ W ° W C] « o LC <( 0) r _z J W j �_ O w > o Cr) 3 Z ^� A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE i SOUTH LINE OF GOVT LOT 8-, j SE CORNER OF ZIMMERMAN _N8940--4776�E _447_43 l FARM 1ST ADDITION—_ irYf I Lq 9 1 T — - - - —N89'' I "E `._S LINE OF GOVT. LOT 8, SEC. 8 447.00 ** * PIONEER u D SURVEYORS * eng neer ng P ARR[R5. **** 104049503.DWG JMM J` J` J SE CORNER OF GOVT. 4 S89'32I52"E LOT 8, SEC. 8 S LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 9 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (651) 881-1914 FAX:881-9488 ieOn�c's 625 Highway 10 N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 (763) 783-1880 FAx m-1883 1303.09 SE CORNER OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 9 ., U W N W 0 3 N W W 0 r z W M= / � r / :n o Q O z (50 Z zi "J A `C _ G7 IILJT � TI rEilri o STREET o :7 _D F— Ld C ro Li /<( PROPOSED ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT An easement for roadway and drainage and utility purposes lying over, under and across all that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 9 and Government Lot 8 of Section 8, all in Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota lying south of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 19 minutes 14 seconds West, along the east line of said ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION, to the intersection with a line lying 85.50 feet northerly of, as measured at right angles to, and parallel with the south line of said Government Lot 8 and to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes 46 seconds East, along said parallel -line, a distance of 447.43 feet to the intersection with a line lying 85.50 feet northerly of, as measured at right angles to, and parallel with the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 32 minutes 52 seconds East, along said parallel line, a distance of 993.36 feet, thence northeasterly, a distance of 17.07 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the north, having a central angle of 05 degrees 29 minutes 35 seconds and a radius of 178.00 feet; thence North 84 degrees 57 minutes 32 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 157.85 feet; thence southeasterly, a distance of 106.29 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a central angle of 22 degrees 23 minutes 26 seconds and a radius of 272.00 feet; thence South 72 degrees 39 minutes 02 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 30.24 feet to the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and there terminating. . THIS SKETCH DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENTS FROM OR ONTO THE HEREON DESCRIBED LAND, EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS WHICH AFFECT SAID LAND OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID LAND. WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO WESTW00D COMMUNITY CHURCH THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMIN OTA, DATED THIS 29TH DAY ,JULY, 2004. SIG tIED: ONEER ENGINEERING, P.�A� John C. Larson, Professional Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 19828 104049 04-145 �. PROPOSED ROADWAY AND �0 % NNS wN° Oo mp 'DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT , p.tP-0 ° �^° 1 fA LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH , —LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 157.85 58932'52"E 993.36 _ �!\;N84-57'322 E _ SE CORNER OF GOVT. 4 S89'32I52"E LOT 8, SEC. 8 S LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 9 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (651) 881-1914 FAX:881-9488 ieOn�c's 625 Highway 10 N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 (763) 783-1880 FAx m-1883 1303.09 SE CORNER OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 9 ., U W N W 0 3 N W W 0 r z W M= / � r / :n o Q O z (50 Z zi "J A `C _ G7 IILJT � TI rEilri o STREET o :7 _D F— Ld C ro Li /<( PROPOSED ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT An easement for roadway and drainage and utility purposes lying over, under and across all that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 9 and Government Lot 8 of Section 8, all in Township 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota lying south of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 19 minutes 14 seconds West, along the east line of said ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION, to the intersection with a line lying 85.50 feet northerly of, as measured at right angles to, and parallel with the south line of said Government Lot 8 and to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes 46 seconds East, along said parallel -line, a distance of 447.43 feet to the intersection with a line lying 85.50 feet northerly of, as measured at right angles to, and parallel with the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 32 minutes 52 seconds East, along said parallel line, a distance of 993.36 feet, thence northeasterly, a distance of 17.07 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the north, having a central angle of 05 degrees 29 minutes 35 seconds and a radius of 178.00 feet; thence North 84 degrees 57 minutes 32 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 157.85 feet; thence southeasterly, a distance of 106.29 feet, along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a central angle of 22 degrees 23 minutes 26 seconds and a radius of 272.00 feet; thence South 72 degrees 39 minutes 02 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 30.24 feet to the East line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and there terminating. . THIS SKETCH DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENTS FROM OR ONTO THE HEREON DESCRIBED LAND, EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS WHICH AFFECT SAID LAND OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID LAND. WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO WESTW00D COMMUNITY CHURCH THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMIN OTA, DATED THIS 29TH DAY ,JULY, 2004. SIG tIED: ONEER ENGINEERING, P.�A� John C. Larson, Professional Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 19828 104049 04-145 • Document No OFFICE OF THE T 149297 REGISTRAR OF TITLES IIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII CARVER 13 COUNTY, eeMINNESOTA Certified and fled on 10-27-2004 at 11:00 E AM ❑ PM 2004-10-27 1111111111111I11IIIINIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII KarlW. Han Titles CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT 04-20 SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated July 12, 2004, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and Westwood Community Church (the "Developer"). I. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for a 166 -space parking lot expansion, extension of temporary drive and extension of West 78th Street (referred to in this Permit as the "project"). The land is legally described in the attached Schedule A - Legal Description. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enter into this Permit and furnish the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: • Plan A—Site Plan dated May 14, 2004, prepared by Pioneer Engineering, P.A. • Plan B --Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plan dated May 14, 2004, prepared by Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 1 SCANNED • Plan C—Landscaping Plan dated May 14, 2004, prepared by Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by June 30, 2005. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, or cash escrow, in the amount of $706,189.00 ($296,821 – grading/restoration; $9,715 – watermain; $114,949 – storm sewer; $282,204 – streets; and $2,500 – erosion control). If the Developer requests a Certificate of Occupancy prior to the installation of site landscaping, then the Developer shall provide to the city a letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount sufficient to ensure the installation of said landscaping. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand -delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Westwood Community Church 3121 Westwood Drive Excelsior, MN 55331 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand -delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. Approved Site Plan #04-20 as shown on the plans dated May 14, 2004 and subject to the following conditions: NA 0 0 a. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. b. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around all existing landscaping at the edge of grading limits. c. Any existing landscaping that is removed must be replaced when the parking lot construction is completed. d. The landscape islands shall include mulch rings around the trees and be seeded or sodded elsewhere. e. Overstory trees are required along West 78th St.; one every 30 feet. f. Three accessible parking spaces must be added to the existing accessible parking area. g. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). The applicant shall receive the City's approval of a wetland replacement plan prior to any wetland impact occurring. h. A wetland buffer 0 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 10 feet) shall be maintained around all existing and proposed wetlands (wetland buffers proposed for PVC must maintain a width of 16.5 feet). Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and will pay the City $20 per sign. i. All structures shall maintain a 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. j. The proposed development shall maintain existing runoff rates. Storm water calculations shall be submitted to staff to ensure runoff rates will not increase as a result of the proposed development. The applicant may work with the Arboretum to ensure their concerns are addressed. k. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used for mitigation credit and storm water ponds. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slome Time (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area Steeper than 3:1 7 days is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days N 0 0 These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. in. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. n. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, e.g. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering) and Army Corps of Engineers and comply with their conditions of approval. o. All final plans must be signed by a registered civil engineer. p. Use the latest version (2004) of the City's Standard Detail Plates. q. The twin storm sewer culverts under West 78th Street must be RCP Class 5. r. The existing driveway from Highway 41 to the existing homes in the northwest corner of the West 78th Street intersection must be removed and seeded or sodded. s. The new painted median for the eastbound West 78th Street traffic on the east side of Highway 41 must be a raised concrete median with pedestrian ramps. t. Install a temporary turnaround with barricades and a sign stating "This street to be extended" at the west end of new West 78th Street. u. Provide a pedestrian ramp at the northeast comer of the new West 78th Street/ ighway 41 intersection for connection to the future city trail. v. Incorporate the conditions of the MnDOT review letter dated June 1, 2004 into the plans. w. Show all of the proposed grades for the new driveway to the existing home in the southeast corner of the site. x. A permit for the proposed retaining wall is required to be obtained from the Building Department and the wall must be designed by a registered structural engineer. y. Off-site grading will require a temporary easement or right -of -entry agreement from the Arboretum. z. Should earthwork quantities not balance on site and materials need to be imported or exported from the site, the developer will need to supply the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval by staff. In addition, if material is proposed to be exported 9 to another location in Chanhassen, it should be noted that the properties would be required to obtain an earthwork permit from the City. aa. All areas disturbed as a result of construction -related activity must be sodded and/or seeded and disc mulched within two weeks of disturbance. bb. A MnDOT drainage permit will be required. In addition, an NPDES permit and Watershed district permit will be required for the project grading. cc. Drainage and utility easements will be required over the wetland, pond, and the adjacent mitigation areas. An easement for access purposes will also be required for future maintenance of the wetlands. dd. Erosion control measures and site restoration must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Staff recommends that the City's Type R silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to all existing wetlands and ponds. In addition, erosion control blankets should be used on all slopes 3:1 or greater with heights of 6' or more. ee. A financial security will be required to guarantee installation of the public improvements. ff. Bituminous curb and gutter must be added to the temporary driveway. gg. Prior to any future building expansion to the west side of the existing church building, the temporary access driveway from West 78th Street must be brought up to current standards in effect at the time. hh. The raised median on West 78`s Street on the east side of TH 41, which is proposed to be removed, shall be replaced in the correct alignment with the westward extension of West 78t°. ii. A sidewalk shall be extended along the main driveway from the main entrance of the church on the east side to the northern end of the driveway where the new parking lot ends and sidewalks shall be extended to the east through the landscape islands of the new parking lot. J. Additional landscaping along the north side on Tanadoona Drive. kk. The church shall continue to use a public safety officer to monitor and direct traffic from the church for three months following the completion of West 78`" Street. After three months of observation, traffic operations shall be re-evaluated and the use of public safety officer may be required by the city." 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein. 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN i'� (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisjj!�day of 2004, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ".AAAAAMMMA € ' Kati J ENGELHARDT Notary Public- Mirncso'a MY Comvvvvvvvv�W v STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF Carver DEVELOPER: w BY: ,2� I FA Dan Russ as Personal Representative of Wes y Church foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2004 by l R-� as Personal Representative of Westwood CommunUy Church, a Minnesota non-profit corporation, on behalf of the church. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: �-- ' City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 JEAN M. s ECKLING (952) 227-1100 Notary Public -Minnesota IRY"� Commission EXP""Jan 31, 2009 9 0 CONSENT Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this -Y— day of L -u 5 2004 f-r2ST /VAriDN,,. &4c of 6rt,UC-4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY Ofd� ) The q ging instru ent was acknowledged before me this day of 2004, by the vice President o the First Nati 1 Bank of Chaska, on if of the bank. r'".."WMAIN NOTA9RYP �.� PAMELA R.KURTZ Notary Pablic-Minnewte My Comm. E�ires Jan. 31 2005 DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT .40fi r 1 . GENERAL CONDITION 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, and 3) the City has issued a building permit. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties E: 0 0 recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developers expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developers and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including materials that have blown, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be wan -anted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post a letter of credit from a bank or cash escrow with the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. 7. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attomeys' fees. W 0 0 B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be 10 0 0 grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recordine. This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. Construction Hours. The normal construction hours and maintenance of equipment ffl 0 0 under this contract shall be from 7:00 am. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws. Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the site plan, the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for 12 0 0 construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning neither the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. 13 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Schedule A Legal Description Continued File No.: CA 16562 CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9 and that part of Government Lots 8 and 9 of Section 8, all in Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter has a bearing of North 0 degrees 32 minutes 39 secou;ls West, a dis'.ance of 978.50 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 18.77 feet; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East a distance of 40.00 feet; thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 638.58 feet; thence North 87 degrees 00 minutes 49 seconds West a distance of 822.99 feet; thence South 1 degree 58 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 206.39 feet; thence South 28 degrees 11 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 368.57 feet; thence South 41 degrees 10 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 410.76 feet; thence South 7 degrees 50 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 350.24 feet; thence South 13 degrees 35 minutes 53 seconds East a distance of 397.22 feet; thence South 8 degrees 05 minutes 03 seconds East a distance of 38.84 feet; thence North 89 degrees 43 minutes 07 seconds West about 385 feet, to the shoreline of Lake Minnewashta; thence Southerly, along said shoreline, to the south tine of said Government Lot 8; thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes 46 seconds East, along said south line of Government Lot 8 about 1756 feet to the southeast corner of said Government Lot 8; thence South 89 degrees 32 minutes 26 seconds East, along the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 1054.74 feet, to a point 248.27 feet westerly from the southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 34 minutes 36 seconds West a distance of 281.21 feet; thence South 89 degrees 40 minutes 26 seconds East a distance of 225.90 feet; thence North 0 degrees 23 minutes 47 seconds West a distance of 17.74 feet; thence North 89 degrees 05 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 20.56 feet, to the east line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 54 minutes 38 seconds West; along last said east tine, a distance of 1046.12 feet to said point of beginning. EXCEPT: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Nortcwest Quarter; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 se:onds West, assuming the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter has a bearing of North 0 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West, a distance of 978.50 feet thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 18.77 feet; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East, a distance of 40.00 feet; thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West, a distance of 283.38 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 492.43 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 131.14 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 486.30 feet; thence North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 451.81 feet; thence North 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds West, a distance of 486.30 feet•, thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 451.81 feet to the point of beginning. CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE E 0 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Schedule A Legal Description Continued File No.: CA 16562 ALSO EXCEPT: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9 and that part of Government Lots 8 and 9 of Section 8, all in Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter has a bearing of North 0 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West, a distance of 978.50 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 18.77 feet; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East a distance of 40.00 feet, to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence NortL 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 283.38 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 492.43 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East a distance of 115.18 feet, to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East a distance of 15.96 feet; thence North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 451.81 feet; thence North 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds West, a distance of 131.14 feet; thence North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 40.62 feet; thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 355.20 feet, to a point distant 638.58 feet northwesterly from the above referenced "Point A"; thence North 87 degrees 00 minutes 49 seconds West a distance of 822.99 feet; thence South 1 degree 58 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 206.39 feet; thence South 28 degrees 11 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 303.66 feet thence South 63 degrees 31 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 1266.35 feet to the intersection with a line bearing South 26 degrees 28 minutes 40 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence North 26 degrees 28 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 390.62 feet to the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPT: All of ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, including Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and the roads dedicated to the public in said plat. ALSO EXCEPT: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section Nine (9), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116) North, Range Twenty-three (23) West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter has a bearing of North 0 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West, a dibtance of 978.50 feet; theoce South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds west a distance of 18.77 feet; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East, a distance of 40.00 feet; thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West, a distance of 283.38 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 492.43 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 617.44 feet; thence North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 451.81 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 56.31 feet; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West, a distance of 131.82 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 60.84 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 131.14 feet to the point of beginning. CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 0 0 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Schedule A Legal Description Continued File No.: CA 16562 ALSO EXCEPT: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section Nine (9), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116) North, Range Twenty Three (23) West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West (based on a bearing of North 00 degrees 35 minutes 15 seconds West for a straight line between the northwest comer and the southwest corner of said Section 9) a distance of 750.15 feet to the point of bee nnin of the land to be described; thence continue North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 228.35 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 18.77 feet to the northerly comer of the easterly end of Field Lane, dedicated in SUNSET HILL ON LAKE MINNEWASHTA, according to the found monumentation of the recorded plat thereof; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East, along said easterly end of Field Lane, a distance of 40.00 feet to the southerly corner of said easterly end of land as monumented; thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West, along the southerly line of said Field Lane as monumented; a distance of 283.38 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 40.62 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East a distance of 486.30 feet; thence North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 60.84 feet to said point of beginning. (TORRENS) CITY OF CHANHA�SEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FAX (952) 227-1110 TO: Campbell Knutson, PA 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter LETTER OARANSMITTAL 8/11/04 Sue Nelson Document ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Request ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 7/12/04 04-20 2004-20 Site Plan Permit Westwood Community Church THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ® For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ® For Recording ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ FORBIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 1 COPY TO: Planning Case File No. 04-20 SIGNED: Kim Wuwissen, (952) 227-1107 It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. • CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT 04-20 SPECIAL PROVISIONS 0 AGREEMENT dated July 12, 2004, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and Westwood Community Church (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan for a 166 -space parking lot expansion, extension of temporary drive and extension of West 78`s Street (referred to in this Permit as the "project"). The land is legally described in the attached Schedule A - Legal Description. 2. Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enter into this Permit and furnish the security required by it. 3. Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terns of this Permit, the written terms shall control. The plans are: • Plan A—Site Plan dated May 14, 2004, prepared by Pioneer Engineering, P.A. • Plan B—Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plan dated May 14, 2004, prepared by Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 1 E F • Plan C—Landscaping Plan dated May 14, 2004, prepared by Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 4. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by June 30, 2005. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Permit, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, or cash escrow, in the amount of $706,189.00 ($296,821 – grading/restoration; $9,715 – watermain; $114,949 – storm sewer; $282,204 – streets; and $2,500 – erosion control). If the Developer requests a Certificate of Occupancy prior to the installation of site landscaping, then the Developer shall provide to the city a letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount sufficient to ensure the installation of said landscaping. 6. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand -delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Westwood Community Church 3121 Westwood Drive Excelsior, MN 55331 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand -delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7. Other Special Conditions. Approved Site Plan #04-20 as shown on the plans dated May 14, 2004 and subject to the following conditions: 2 0 0 a. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. b. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around all existing landscaping at the edge of grading limits. c. Any existing landscaping that is removed must be replaced when the parking lot construction is completed. d. The landscape islands shall include mulch rings around the trees and be seeded or sodded elsewhere. e. Overstory trees are required along West 78th St.; one every 30 feet. f. Three accessible parking spaces must be added to the existing accessible parking area. g. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). The applicant shall receive the City's approval of a wetland replacement plan prior to any wetland impact occurring. h. A wetland buffer 0 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 10 feet) shall be maintained around all existing and proposed wetlands (wetland buffers proposed for PVC must maintain a width of 16.5 feet). Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and will pay the City $20 per sign. i. All structures shall maintain a 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. j. The proposed development shall maintain existing runoff rates. Storm water calculations shall be submitted to staff to ensure runoff rates will not increase as a result of the proposed development. The applicant may work with the Arboretum to ensure their concerns are addressed. k. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used for mitigation credit and storm water ponds. 1. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area Steeper than 3:1 7 days is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days 0 0 These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. m. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. n. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, e.g. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering) and Army Corps of Engineers and comply with their conditions of approval. o. All final plans must be signed by a registered civil engineer. p. Use the latest version (2004) of the City's Standard Detail Plates. q. The twin storm sewer culverts under West 78th Street must be RCP Class 5. r. The existing driveway from Highway 41 to the existing homes in the northwest comer of the West 78th Street intersection must be removed and seeded or sodded. s. The new painted median for the eastbound West 78th Street traffic on the east side of Highway 41 must be a raised concrete median with pedestrian ramps. t. Install a temporary turnaround with barricades and a sign stating "This street to be extended" at the west end of new West 78th Street. u. Provide a pedestrian ramp at the northeast corner of the new West 78th StreedMghway 41 intersection for connection to the future city trail. v. Incorporate the conditions of the MnDOT review letter dated June 1, 2004 into the plans. w. Show all of the proposed grades for the new driveway to the existing home in the southeast corner of the site. x. A permit for the proposed retaining wall is required to be obtained from the Building Department and the wall must be designed by a registered structural engineer. y. Off-site grading will require a temporary easement or right -of -entry agreement from the Arboretum. z. Should earthwork quantities not balance on site and materials need to be imported or exported from the site, the developer will need to supply the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval by staff. In addition, if material is proposed to be exported 0 to another location in Chanhassen, it should be noted that the properties would be required to obtain an earthwork permit from the City. aa. All areas disturbed as a result of construction -related activity must be sodded and/or seeded and disc mulched within two weeks of disturbance. bb. A MnDOT drainage permit will be required. In addition, an NPDES permit and Watershed district permit will be required for the project grading. cc. Drainage and utility easements will be required over the wetland, pond, and the adjacent mitigation areas. An easement for access purposes will also be required for future maintenance of the wetlands. dd. Erosion control measures and site restoration must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Staff recommends that the Citys Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to all existing wetlands and ponds. In addition, erosion control blankets should be used on all slopes 3:1 or greater with heights of 6' or more. ee. A financial security will be required to guarantee installation of the public improvements. ff. Bituminous curb and gutter must be added to the temporary driveway. gg. Prior to any future building expansion to the west side of the existing church building, the temporary access driveway from West 78th Street must be brought up to current standards in effect at the time. hh. The raised median on West 78th Street on the east side of TH 41, which is proposed to be removed, shall be replaced in the correct alignment with the westward extension of West 78`s. ii. A sidewalk shall be extended along the main driveway from the main entrance of the church on the east side to the northern end of the driveway where the new parking lot ends and sidewalks shall be extended to the east through the landscape islands of the new parking lot. J. Additional landscaping along the north side on Tanadoona Drive. kk. The church shall continue to use a public safety officer to monitor and direct traffic from the church for three months following the completion of West 78th Street. After three months of observation, traffic operations shall be re-evaluated and the use of public safety officer may be required by the city." 8. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Permit are attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein. 5 0 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: = /- ThomFurlong, Mayor AND: Todd Gerhardt, lty Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this-Oday of 2004, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of We City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ��ppAiaAAM�M - tE ,. KAREN J. ENGELHAROT ,:, NoL:ry Public - Minn°Sota �1.. My VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV Commission Expires rf3ifZM> STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF DEVELOPER: BY.( Its foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of, 2oo4 by 1 R� rol �' NOTARY PUBLIC ' DRAFrED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard sneMNG Chanhassen, MN 55317 . W7NoZtarY (952)227-1100 ublic-Minnesota n E%PIMS Jan 31. 2009 rol E CONSENT 0 Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Permit, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this day of ',u 5 2004 f-11?-ST- IV, -rR.ST N�Tro/�/Q v� c3F Gtkdl�r� STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY Ow�) The egging instru ent was acknowledged before me this day of 2004, by / aLLLz PAMELA R. KURTZ Notary P'blio-Minnesota My Comm. E�ires Jan. 31 2005 DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 7 NOTARY PUVVIC CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN PERMIT GENERAL CONDITION 1. Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, and 3) the City has issued a building permit. 2. Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4. Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties K 0 0 recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developers expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developers and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including materials that have blown, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6. Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post a letter of credit from a bank or cash escrow with the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. 7. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attomeys' fees. 0 0 B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Permit. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Permit by the Developer shall be IL; 0 0 grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Permit is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recordine. This Permit shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. Construction Hours. The normal construction hours and maintenance of equipment 11 0 0 under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the site plan, the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District; 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and cormnissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for 12 construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning neither the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. 13 ., . k,trTi� G�n.vxtaa.id,C-F�, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Schedule A Legal Description Continued File No.: CA 16562 CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9 and that part of Government Lots 8 and 9 of Section 8, all in Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter has a bearing of North 0 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West, a distance of 978.50 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 18.77 feet; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East a distance of 40.00 feet; thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 638.58 feet; thence North 87 degrees 00 minutes 49 seconds West a distance of 822.99 feet; thence South 1 degree 58 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 206.39 feet; thence South 28 degrees 11 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 368.57 feet; thence South 41 degrees 10 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 410.76 feet; thence South 7 degrees 50 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 350.24 feet; thence South 13 degrees 35 minutes 53 seconds East a distance of 397.22 feet; thence South 8 degrees 05 minutes 03 seconds East a distance of 38.84 feet; thence North 89 degrees 43 minutes 07 seconds West about 385 feet, to the shoreline of Lake Minnewashta; thence Southerly, along said shoreline, to the south tine of said Government Lot 8; thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes 46 seconds East, along said south line of Government Lot 8 about 1756 feet to the southeast corner of said Government Lot 8; thence South 89 degrees 32 minutes 26 seconds East, along the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 1054.74 feet, to a point 248.27 feet westerly from the southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 0 degreds 34 minutes 36 seconds West a distance of 281.21 feet; thence South 89 degrees 40 minutes 26 seconds East a distance of 225.90 feet; thence North 0 degrees 23 minutes 47 seconds West a distance of 17.74 feet; thence North 89 degrees 05 minutes 22 seconds East a distance of 20.56 feet, to the east line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 54 minutes 38 seconds West; along last said east line, a distance of 1046.12 feet to said point of beginning. EXCEPT: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter has a bearing of North 0 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West, a distance of 978.50 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 18.77 feet; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East, a distance of 40.00 feet; thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West, a distance of 283.38 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 492.43 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 131.14 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 486.30 feet thence North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 451.81 feet; thence North 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds West, a distance of 486.30 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 451.81 feet to the point of beginning. CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 11 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Schedule A Legal Description Continued File No.: CA 16562 ALSO EXCEPT: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 9 and that part of Government Lots 8 and 9 of Section 8, all in Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter has a bearing of North 0 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West, a distance of 978.50 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 18.77 feet; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East a distance of 40.00 feet, to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 283.38 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 492.43 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East a distance of 115.18 feet, to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East a distance of 15.96 feet; thence North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 451.81 feet; thence North 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds West, a distance of 131.14 feet; thence North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 40.62 feet; thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 355.20 feet, to a point distant 638.58 feet northwesterly from the above referenced "Point A"; thence North 87 degrees 00 minutes 49 seconds West a distance of 822.99 feet; thence South 1 degree 58 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 206.39 feet; thence South 28 degrees 11 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 303.66 feet; thence South 63 degrees 31 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of1266.35 feet to the intersection with a line bearing South 26 degrees 28 minutes 40 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence North 26 degrees 28 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 390.62 feet to the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPT: All of ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, including Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and the roads dedicated to the public in said plat. ALSO EXCEPT: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section Nine (9), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116) North, Range Twenty-three (23) West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter has a bearing of North 0 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West, a distance of 978.50 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds west a distance of 18.77 feet; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East, a distance of 40.00 feet; thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West, a distance of 283.38 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 492.43 feet, thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 617.44 feet; thence North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 451.81 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 56.31 feet; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West, a distance of 131.82 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 60.84 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 131.14 feet to the point of beginning. 1901a/"USS/ ♦ Jv J3`i` 'Y117re1:1 0 0 CHICAGO T rLE INSURANCE COMPANY Schedule A Legal Description Continued File No.: CA 16562 ALSO EXCEPT: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section Nine (9), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116) North, Range Twenty Three (23) West of the Sth Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West (based on a bearing of North 00 degrees 35 minutes 15 seconds West for a straight line between the northwest corner and the southwest comer of said Section 9) a distance of 750.15 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continue North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 228.35 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 18.77 feet to the northerly comer of the easterly end of Field Lane, dedicated in SUNSET HILL ON LAKE MINNEWASHTA, according to the found monumentation of the recorded plat thereof; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East, along said easterly end of Field Lane, a distance of 40.00 feet to the southerly corner of said easterly end of land as monumented; thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West, along the southerly line of said Field Lane as monumented; a distance of 283.38 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 40.62 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East a distance of 486.30 feet; thence North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 60.84 feet to said point of beginning. (TORRENS) O y -- 20 City Council SummAuly 12, 2004 • C. AWARD OF BIDS, 2004 BOND ISSUES. Mark Ruff with Ehlers and Associates presented Mayor Furlong and City Manager Gerhardt with a plaque from Standard and Poors for the upgrade to a AA- for the City of Chanhassen. Reasons for the upgrade as outlined by Standard and Poors included recognizing the city's rapidly growing tax base, strong management noted by formalized planning to manage anticipated growth in the city and significant financial reserve levels bolstered by a positive trend between 1996 and 2003 of financial operations. He then reported on the results from the bid opening for the 2004 bond sale. Mayor Furlong thanked city staff, Ehlers and Associates and previous councils for all their hard work in making this bond rating increase happen. Councilman Labatt moved, Councilman Lundquist seconded to approve the award of bids for the following bond series: Resolution #2004-47A: for the $2,115,000 GO Bonds, Series 2004A; Resolution #2004-47B: for the $7,885,000 GO Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2004B; and Resolution #2004-47C: for the $1,170,000 Taxable GO Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 2004C as presented by Ehlers and Associates. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: Gary Carlson, a 40 year resident of the city of Chanhassen who resides at 3891 West 62°0 Street thanked the council for their hard work in all the improvements he's seen in the city. His concern was with Cartway Lane, which abuts Cathcart Park. The park is owned by the City of Shorewood but is totally within the city limits of Chanhassen. All the improvements that have been made to the park have created surface water to run onto his property. He is asking for the city's assistance to upgrade Cartway Lane to help stop the surface water runoff from Cathcart Park. Todd Gerhardt stated staff will meet with Mr. Carlson this week to look at a solution to the problem. _REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO EXPAND THE PARKING LOT (166 SPACES) FOR WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH WITH SECONDARY ACCESS TO HIGHWAY 41, A WETLAND ALTERATION WESTWOOD DRIVE, (WEST OF TH 41 AT TANADOONA DRIVE), PLANNING CASE 04-20. Public Present: Name Address James Haugen 7800 Bavaria Road Doug Stahl Pioneer Engineering City Council SummarAuly 12, 2004 • Dan Russ 51 Choctaw Circle Bob Generous presented the staff report and update from the Planning Commission. Councilman Lundquist asked for clarification on who pays for public safety officers to direct traffic on Highway 41. Councilman Ayotte asked staff to explain how the need for traffic control officers is determined. Councilman Labatt suggested that the city determine whether public safety officers continue to provide traffic control on TH 41. He asked Bob Generous to comment on the one Planning Commissioner who felt that the West 78'b Street extension project was premature without a traffic study. Mayor Furlong asked what options are available to improve traffic flow at the intersection of TH 41 and West 78'" Street. Steve Lillehaug, representing the Planning Commission, talked about condition number 35 and their desire to see the median on West 78`s Street remain. Council discussed with the City Engineer the pros and cons of the median. Councilman Ayotte asked for clarification on peak traffic flows related to church service volumes. James Haugen, representing Westwood Community Church stated he, Doug Stahl with Pioneer Engineer, and Dan Russ were available to answer questions. Councilman Labatt moved, Councilman Lundquist seconded to approve Planning Case #04-20 Site Plan Review for a 166 space parking lot expansion, extension of temporary drive and extension of West 78t, Street, plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated May 14, 2004, subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around all existing landscaping at the edge of grading limits. 3. Any existing landscaping that is removed must be replaced when the parking lot construction is completed. 4. The landscape islands shall include mulch rings around the trees and be seeded or sodded elsewhere. 5. Overstory trees are required along West 78th St.; one every 30 feet. 6. Three accessible parking spaces must be added to the existing accessible parking area. 7. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). The applicant shall receive the City's approval of a wetland replacement plan prior to any wetland impact occurring. 8. A wetland buffer 0 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 10 feet) shall be maintained around all existing and proposed wetlands (wetland buffers proposed for PVC must maintain a width of 16.5 feet). Wetland buffer areas shall be City Council SummarAuly 12, 2004 0 preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and will pay the City $20 per sign. 9. All structures shall maintain a 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 10. The proposed development shall maintain existing runoff rates. Storm water calculations shall be submitted to staff to ensure runoff rates will not increase as a result of the proposed development. The applicant may work with the Arboretum to ensure their concerns are addressed. 11. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used for mitigation credit and storm water ponds. 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area Steeper than 3:1 7 days is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 13. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 14. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, e.g. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering) and Army Corps of Engineers and comply with their conditions of approval. 15. All final plans must be signed by a registered civil engineer. 16. Use the latest version (2004) of the City's Standard Detail Plates. 17. The twin storm sewer culverts under West 78th Street must be RCP Class 5. 18. The existing driveway from Highway 41 to the existing homes in the northwest corner of the West 78th Street intersection must be removed and seeded or sodded. M City Council SummarAuly 12, 2004 • 19. The new painted median for the eastbound West 78th Street traffic on the east side of Highway 41 must be a raised concrete median with pedestrian ramps. 20. Install a temporary turnaround with barricades and a sign stating "This street to be extended" at the west end of new West 78th Street. 21. Provide a pedestrian ramp at the northeast comer of the new West 78th Street/Highway 41 intersection for connection to the future city trail. 22. Incorporate the conditions of the MnDOT review letter dated June 1, 2004 into the plans. 23. Show all of the proposed grades for the new driveway to the existing home in the southeast corner of the site. 24. A permit for the proposed retaining wall is required to be obtained from the Building Department and the wall must be designed by a registered structural engineer. 25. Off-site grading will require a temporary easement or right -of -entry agreement from the Arboretum. 26. Should earthwork quantities not balance on site and materials need to be imported or exported from the site, the developer will need to supply the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval by staff. In addition, if material is proposed to be exported to another location in Chanhassen, it should be noted that the properties would be required to obtain an earthwork permit from the City. 27. All areas disturbed as a result of construction -related activity must be sodded and/or seeded and disc mulched within two weeks of disturbance. 28. A MnDOT drainage permit will be required. In addition, an NPDES permit and Watershed district permit will be required for the project grading. 29. Drainage and utility easements will be required over the wetland, pond, and the adjacent mitigation areas. An easement for access purposes will also be required for future maintenance of the wetlands. 30. Erosion control measures and site restoration must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Staff recommends that the City's Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to all existing wetlands and ponds. In addition, erosion control blankets should be used on all slopes 3:1 or greater with heights of 6' or more. 5 City Council Summa*uly 12, 2004 • 31. A financial security will be required to guarantee installation of the public improvements. 32. Bituminous curb and gutter must be added to the temporary driveway. 33. Prior to any future building expansion to the west side of the existing church building, the temporary access driveway from West 78th Street must be brought up to current standards in effect at the time." 34. The raised median on the east side of 41, placed on West 78'b currently to be removed and a new one placed in correct alignment with the extension westward of West 78m. 35. A sidewalk be extended along the main driveway from the main entrance of the church on the east side to the northern end of the driveway where the new parking lot ends and sidewalks shall be extended to the east through the landscape islands at the south end of the new parking lot. 36. Additional landscaping along the north side on Tanadoona Drive. 37. The church shall continue to use a public safety officer to monitor and direct traffic from the church for time months following completion of West 78`" Street. After three months of observations, traffic operations shall be re-evaluated and the use of public safety officers may be required by the City. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilman Labatt moved, Councilman Peterson seconded to approve Planning Case #04-20 Wetland Alteration Permit to alter and fill wetlands on site, plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated May 14, 2004, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall develop an amendment to the wetland replacement plan to achieve the required 2:1 replacement without employing credits constructed during the first phase. 2. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). The applicant shall receive the City's approval of a wetland replacement plan prior to any wetland impact occurring. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. 3. A wetland buffer 0 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 10 feet) shall be maintained around all existing and proposed wetlands. (Wetland buffers proposed for PVC must maintain a width of 16.5 feet.) Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The City Council SummaryOuly 12, 2004 0 applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and will pay the City $20 per sign. 4. All structures shall maintain a 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 5. The proposed development shall maintain existing runoff rates. Storm water calculations shall be submitted to staff to ensure runoff rates will not increase as a result of the proposed development. The applicant may work with the Arboretum to ensure their concerns are addressed. 6. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used for mitigation credit and storm water ponds. 7. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tvae of Sloe Time (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area Steeper than 3:1 7 days is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 8. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 9. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, e.g. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering) and Army Corps of Engineers and comply with their conditions of approval." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 13,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH REQUESTS FOR A PARKING SETBACK CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT, LLC, CVS/PHARMACY, PLANNING CASE NO. 04-21. 7 City Council Meeting ty 12, 2004 • o4-2-0 Gary Carlson: He's been very supportive. He's come out almost within a day and repaired the roads. What he can do. I don't think he, his crew wants to go up onto, although it's 16 V2 foot wide. It is a public, the Shorewood park is owned by Shorewood so, but you know I would probably get plenty of letters if I went up there and started making a ditch, but I'm sure. Todd Gerhardt: We don't want you doing that. Gary Carlson: I'm sure they can work it out between the City of Chanhassen and the City of Shorewood to say hey, let's do something a little more permanent. I'm ready to accept full improvement of that road, and I've already, when I've done other developments along that area in the city have given them the full 40 foot right-of-way so that right-of-way is sitting there on my property. On the development I did across from my property. There's a couple neighbors that haven't given up that land for a decent road but I think that's a pretty big step but I'm certainly willing to take that, because that's what really needs to be done but it's just that area is not, there's some open properties that that Cartway goes down to that's not ready, it's in speculative development right now but it hasn't started through your process yet of getting everything approved. When that happens, that road's got to be improved then. But this, there's inexpensive ways to solve that by just ditching for now and making sure it doesn't flood because Mr. Toll, my neighbor next to me, he's gotten flooded this spring too but he just didn't want to come before you. Todd Gerhardt: Okay. Mayor, council members, we'll be meeting with Mr. Carlson this week and looking at solutions to the problem and look to see what we can do to correct it. There's a variety of property owners in that area that you know, wherever you divert the water, it goes to somebody else's but there should be some solutions and we'll investigate that. Mayor Furlong: Thank you Mr. Carlson for coming forward. We're still within visitor presentations, if anybody else would like to come forward and address any issue with the council, this would be your opportunity. If there are none this evening, then we will go ahead and close visitor presentations and move on with our agenda. SECONDARY ACCESS TO HIGHWAY 41, A WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT TO ALTER AND FILL WETLANDS ON SITE ON PROPERTY ZONED OFFICE AND INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT, OI, LOCATED AT 3121 WESTWOOD DRIVE, (WEST OF TH 41 AT TANADOONA DRIVE), PLANNING CASE 04-20. Public Present: Name Address 0 City Council Meeting lay 12, 2004 • James Haugen 7800 Bavaria Road Doug Stahl Pioneer Engineering Dan Russ 51 Choctaw Circle Bob Generous: Thank you Mr. Mayor, City Council members. There's two parts to this approval. First is a site plan review. The applicant is expanding their parking lot in the extreme northern side of their property. Current access is off Tanadoona Drive. As a condition of approval for this development for Westwood Community Church, the city stated that they needed to provide a secondary access. At this time they are proposing the construction of the extension of West 78"' Street from Trunk Highway 41 westerly. They're going to do this as part of the development of their site. It will be a public road so once it's completed the city would take over maintenance of it. They only really need to do is a driveway access into the property but because of access issues, the properties to the west, we discussed it with the property owner and they've agreed to make these improvements. The reason for the wetland alteration permit is there is a wetland approximately in this area of the site that the roadway extension will be impacting. They are providing mitigation on site. Staff is recommending approval. I did hand out some modifications to the conditions. We met with the applicant last Friday. This was after the packet went out and they had some concerns. Condition number 4 stated that the outer islands would be wood chips. We've agreed that the mulching should just be around the trees and they can either seed or sod the rest of their landscape island. There are two temporary driveways that are being provided. One is for the house on the, just off of 41 and the other is a temporary road. Because they don't know if these will be the final location, they didn't want to put in a permanent improvement. Concrete apron and staff concurs with that provided that these access points do not impede the trail that's being put in with the roadway. We have no problem deleting that condition. They've also at the Planning Commission they wanted, added a condition to extend the sidewalk from the east of the church to the new parking lot, and then they wanted to put in the diagonal across that. In meeting with the church they stated that the diagonal really doesn't work for people who come there. If they park south of that, they won't use it. They're not going to walk back and go across, plus it takes out approximately 10 percent of their parking area. They did agree to provide a sidewalk connection on the end island within the parking area so that people coming down could then transfer up and come into the site. We believe this is a reasonable alternative. Finally the Planning Commission added a condition that the church maintain a public safety officer out at the intersections. They were concerned that this was an open ended arrangement. As part of the report we did, the engineering did suggest a termination point. We modified this condition to give them a 3 year, or 3 month period to evaluate the use of public safety personnel out there. The 3 month we believe is adequate because this will be the high time for their use of the facility with the holidays coming up. It's after the completion and then they would be able to re-evaluate whether or not they should continue that, in discussion with the public safety officers. So with that staff is recommending approval of the site plan and wetland alteration permit subject to the conditions in the staff report as modified with the memo tonight. With that I'd be happy to answer any more questions. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Questions for staff. 7 City Council Meeting *y 12, 2004 • Councilman Lundquist: Bob, the public safety officer that's part of that, that's at the intersections due to the traffic coming on and off of 41? Bob Generous: Correct. Councilman Lundquist: Right now. Are we putting those officers out there at the city's expense or at the church? Bob Generous: No, the church hires them. Councilman Lundquist: Okay, and that was a condition that we put as part of their original site plan? Bob Generous: No. They did that because they had concern for traffic operations at the site. Councilman Lundquist: Okay. Councilman Ayotte: What's the recipe, the menu, formula for evaluation? I mean we have traffic patrol activity going out there. What factors are being accessed to determine whether or not there are issues compared with how you put that together? Bob Generous: I think I'd defer to engineering. Paul Oehme: Well it would depend upon the volume of traffic that's out there. If there's any accidents. We always look at that as a high priority. Factor access, egress for the site and just time delays. There's factors that traffic engineers can use to calculate that type of level of service. Councilman Ayotte: Okay, so our reference points that we evaluate whether or not the traffic situation there is below or above a standard? Paul Oehme: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay, any other questions? Councilman Labatt: Just along the same line here. So after 3 months, who has the final say? Does Westwood come in and say there's no need or does the city say there's a need and you're still going to keep it in force? Who has the final word? Bob Generous: I would believe it would be the sheriff's people that would ultimately make the suggestion. Carver County. Councilman Ayotte: Do they know that? 1 City Council Meeting Ay 12, 2004 • Councilman Labatt: Because if they're hired off duty to come in and work, I would think that we as a city would want to maintain that control. I mean not the sheriff so the only thing I would say is after 3 months observation, traffic operations will be re-evaluated by the city and the use of a public safety officer shall be required as needed. What we're saying here is that we as a city, there are Sunday mornings when I'll drive on 41 and it's backed up way past West 78"' coming from the south. So I mean you know, as a city we need to look at, when Paul says we look at stacking or traffic delays, we need to look at and the city should have the final say. Councilman Ayotte: Mayor may I? Mayor Furlong: Yes, Councilman Ayotte. Councilman Ayotte: With the elimination of that diagonal, what was the Planning Commission's response to that? They came in by extending the island out there, or the new parking lot instead and they put in a sidewalk. That was it and the balance was scratched. The diagonal walkways because it ate up too much parking. What was the Planning Commission's response to that? That was all worked out. Bob Generous: The Planning Commission didn't, that was their recommendation that they put in, extend the sidewalk and put in the diagonal. Councilman Ayotte: Okay, I misunderstood. Thank you. Bob Generous: The church agreed with the extension. It's just their concern was the diagonal, that it didn't serve the function that was hoped. Even in their existing parking lot area, people don't really use it. Councilman Labatt: Bob, in the staff report you talk about the one Planning Commission who felt that the West 78`s Street extension project was premature without a traffic study. Can you just comment on that one commissioner's comments. If you recall. Bob Generous: He was concerned that we were approving a reconstruction of an intersection without having the traffic study in place to ascertain whether or not those improvements were sufficient and adequate to accommodate traffic. Since they had the meeting, we did get a traffic study was completed and the intersection works. The one movement that we all knew would be of concern, the left turn is the only problem really. All the other movements work. Mayor Furlong: I guess as a follow-up there for me Councilman Labatt, with regard with that one part of the intersection that doesn't work, I think that's left turn off of West 78d' going south or north on 41. What are the options to improve that traffic flow. Is it only a signalized intersection that would improve that? Paul Oehme: Yes. City Council Meeting Vy 12, 2004 • Mayor Furlong: I assume a four way stop would just make 41 traffic die. Paul Oehme: MnDot wouldn't allow for that but a signal would help that event. That situation. Unfortunately to make a signal warrant under this criteria, the Sunday peak hour traffic, they would not meet... Mayor Furlong: With the information that they have now, even in the 2010 projected traffic volumes, it still wouldn't warrant, based on traffic activity, it still wouldn't warrant a signal at that intersection? Paul Oehme: Based on current traffic levels during Sunday peak hour, it still would not make it. Under MnDot's current standard for signal installation. Mayor Furlong: That was Sunday peak hour projections to be the highest use of that intersection? Paul Oehme: That's correct. For this development. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Other questions? Councilman Ayotte: In the traffic study was the schedule of services considered and options to changing schedules to offset traffic congestion? Bob Generous: Well the schedule of services was considered. I don't know if they looked at alternatives. Councilman Ayotte: I mean typically if you have an issue with congestion and if it's associated with time of day, they possibly could influence the traffic congestion by off setting schedule. I don't know if that was looked at. Mayor Furlong: Does having the public safety officer at those intersections, right now it's Tanadoona but here it would be at both. Does that improve the traffic flow of the entire intersection? Paul Oehme: Absolutely. I mean the traffic safety officer would have the ability to more or less stop traffic when warranted and get the traffic out of the Tanadoona and/or West 78'" Street to help the situation at each intersection. Mayor Furlong: So it's basically, in my analogy it's using a rifle to hit the problem rather than a shotgun. Yeah, okay. And I guess I would you know, with regard to Councilman Labatt's question about retaining authority for that, I think that makes some sense so maybe we can come up with some wording there where the use of that public safety officer, if required by the city. Maybe that's a way, rather than saying shall use. Just say if required from the city to retain that authority here. Because that way that sounds like, from what I'm hearing, it's the best way to mitigate the traffic problems at that I0 City Council Meeting f y 12, 2004 • intersection or like the one at Tanadoona, which isn't subject to this approval process. Would you concur? Paul Oehme: Absolutely. And again, Westwood that initiated the safety officer too so. Mayor Furlong: Yeah, which gives me some comfort. Paul Oehme: So they'd be willing to extend too I'm assuming. Mayor Furlong: Yep. But at least if there's a disagreement on the requirements we can work through that. I think they've been a good neighbor, good citizen so I'm not anticipating any problems there. Any other questions or comments? Yes. Steve Ullehaug: Mr. Mayor, council members. I'd like to speak regarding one of the conditions on here. As a Planning Commissioner I feel that staff has adequately addressed what your discussion has been with an exception to condition, striking out condition number 35. I think staff missed the goals and intent that the Planning Commission was trying to relay to them. Staff proved that medians aren't required but the intent that the Planning Commission was trying to get across to them is we want West 78`" Street to have a more uniformed appearance from the east end all the way to the west end. Currently there's a median out at that intersection. We felt that it's a safer condition to have that median out there as it exists and to incorporate a median in the new design. So I guess I would ask the council to ask staff, what is the safer design and then support that safer design and I would believe that to with median. So I guess if you have any further questions I'd be willing to answer them. Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Any comments on that? Mr. Oehme. Paul Oehme: Again, the MnDot has taken a look at the intersection. They didn't think a median would be warranted at this particular location. In fact they didn't even realize or didn't know why that median was put in in the fust place. The traffic study addressed that issue as well. They did not think a median would be warranted at this location at this time. From a staffs perspective, it's, it doesn't make it a safer intersection maybe. It's hard to tell that. That intersection is narrow enough where you know medians are more or less to channelize the traffic and give it more of a common, that it have the traffic go, drivers, the traffic and the traffic channelized into a specific location so you know it's something that staff didn't feel was warranted or was necessary to make it safer at this time. Mayor Furlong: Okay. I guess from that, I'm sorry go ahead. Councilman Peterson: So MnDot, you're basically saying wouldn't approve the median anyway? Paul Oehme: Well they didn't have an opinion on it was my understanding. They said it wasn't warranted for this particular situation. So they, I think they would have approved 11 City Council Meeting *y 12, 2004 • it without it, or with it. But they would approve it, and they have approved it without it SO. Mayor Furlong: What type of traffic conditions in there would warrant a median? Similar to, I mean there are traffic conditions that warrant a signal at the intersection. Are there similar types of standards? Paul Oehme: Four lane divided. Powers Boulevard is a good example of that where you get a larger intersection. Typically you want a median there for pedestrian crossing. Mobility. Channelizing the traffic a little bit more so in those types of situations. 78th Street is two lane. Two lane collector roadway so. And I believe that's the only location on 78th Street that currently has a median from Powers all the way out to Trunk Highway 41. Mayor Furlong: Aren't there others along the median? Councilman Labatt: Galpin there's a median. Paul Oehme: Is there at Galpin? Mayor Furlong: And one of the issues that I talked, look at, and this goes back, just give me a second. This goes back to a development that came through here by Plowshares earlier to develop the property on the northeast comer of 5 and, or 41 and West 78th. The entrance to that was right about where the median stopped and I always looked at that because the median physically takes up space in the roadway too. Are we proposing to expand the roadway at all? Paul Oehme: Well there is a right tum lane there on 78th Street. Mayor Furlong: This would be to go into the new development. If you turned off 41 to go east on West 78th and then turned north into the new development, the Plowshares development, it always occurred to me that while there's physically room to get a couple cars by there, the median's right there. I guess I look at that too from a future development standpoint. From again, from a flow and safety. You have another comment? Steve Lillehaug: I'd just like to add that West 78th Street has medians about at every intersection all the way out to there with the exception to a couple T intersections. Mayor Furlong: Yeah, it's got medians. Steve Lillehaug: And just to reiterate, we would like, our direction was to help promote a safer design and just to promote that throughout the city and our opinion is with median is a safer design. I think that's the direction we should head in the city, thank you. 12 City Council Meeting -iy 12, 2004 • Mayor Furlong: Okay, thanks. Any other comments or questions? I guess we're still at questions. Councilman Ayotte: What's the highest density of traffic percent wise that we can anticipate in that stretch when the services are at peak? Paul Oehme: I guess percentage of traffic, um. The peak traffic, we're looking at. Councilman Ayotte: Understand the question. I'm talking about when there's schedule of services and church is on, what's the increase, with the increase in, they have a common parishioners but is it going to be a 9:00 service is going to be the high density flow. What increase can we anticipate in that area? Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council, just so you can look at what Paul's looking at. If you go to page 6 and 7 of the staff report, they have the 2005 volumes and peak times in there. Councilman Ayotte: But what I don't know is that with the service, anticipated increase in population for service or without it? Todd Gerhardt: The top is the current estimated volumes and the bottom would be 2010. Expected volumes. Paul Oehme: Well 2005 volumes would, the 2005 volumes would basically be the parking lot improvements associated with that intersection and 2010 with the development taking place at 2010. So basically with the 2005 volumes, you figure 3 Sunday volumes and that's considering in the parking lot expansion. So basically, I mean the volumes at the 2005, there's really no traffic at that intersection heading westbound on West 78`" Street but at the intersection of 41 and West 78"' Street, so it's basically a 100 percent increase from what it is right now. If that answers your question. Councilman Ayotte: So would, and if islands are supposed to be a calming effect, based on the peak activity, would it cause congestion versus clearance? That's the part I was, because I hear a calming effect. Paul Oehme: Right. It's a channelizing effect. It helps traffic you know channelize and direct traffic a little bit better than just striping the intersection, so in terms of you know channelization, yeah it would help in effect, especially in the winter time on periods too when maybe there's a little snow on the pavement too, so yeah. It does help and it does improve the intersection. But in terms of the minimum requirements that we're talking about for intersection, again it's, it wasn't warranted at this time. Councilman Ayotte: For a minimum requirement. But to enhance safety it could be a positive thing. Paul Oehme: Yes. Yeah, it could be. 13 City Council Meeting *y 12, 2004 • Councilman Ayotte: Okay. Mayor Furlong: You said at this time. If traffic conditions change, could the median be put in retroactively? Paul Oehme: Yeah, I mean if you would put a signal in at 41, that would probably warrant putting in the medians in there. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Other questions for staff? Councilman Labatt: To give a comment real quick, this median has got me totally confused here now. The median is current there? Paul Oehme: Correct. Councilman Labatt: Correct, now we're talking about taking it out. And now Mr. Mayor, you talked about, we have an existing median. Now, we're going to take it out and then if the conditions tell us in a couple years, we're going to put it back in. Mayor Furlong: I guess the question is why are we taking it out? Councilman Labatt: Exactly. That's my. Mayor Furlong: Because of the realignment of that section of road. Paul Oehme: We'd have to take it out because of the realignment of the intersection. To facilitate the improvements to 78th Street west of 41. We're realigning that intersection to facilitate the improvements on 78th Street because the current property lines don't line up where we need them to treat that intersection. To build 78th Street. West of 41. Councilman Ayotte: So it's in the wrong place for the plan. Paul Oehme: Correct. Councilman Labatt: Well, is it, was it put in that, in the wrong place when we did Pulte or is it in the wrong place because of the actions upon west side of 41? Paul Oehme: West of the development. Mayor Furlong: As I understand it, the current alignment assumed that the extension of West 78th west of 41 would be equally, the right-of-way would be equally shared along the property line. Councilman Labatt: Right. 14 City Council Meeting Oly 12, 2004 • Mayor Furlong: Here the applicant is giving up the entire right-of-way out of their property so the extension... Councilman Labatt: Yeah, because the other applicant on the south didn't want to give up any property. Mayor Furlong: Isn't giving up, so the entire right-of-way is going to be to the north of where this was assumed it would go, which would be equally shared of the two property owners, so the applicant is saying we'll give up all the right-of-way on our property. Therefore the road that's already there has to be realigned to line up with the new road. Councilman Ayotte: With road recovery is a cost. If there was more cooperation you might not have that cost, correct? Paul Oehme: Well the intersection improvements, that will be picked up by the developer. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any other questions at this time for staff? If not, is the applicant here or someone representing the applicant here? If they have any comments they'd like to address to the council. James Haugen: James Haugen, I'm on the board at Westwood Community Church, and along with me tonight we have our engineer who's worked with us. Doug Stahl: Doug Stahl with Pioneer Engineering. James Haugen: And also Dan Russ is here as well, so if you have any questions for us that are engineering questions and technical questions, he can handle that. And if it has anything to do with the church and the programming there, I'd be happy to answer your questions there so. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any questions at this time for the applicant? No? Thank you. With that I'll bring it back to council for discussion. Comments. Councilman Labatt: Mayor, I think you worded number 38 there appropriately so I would just share with the rest of the council. I guess the big issue is about this median and this was, I spent a couple hours out there with you Bob and Matt on Plowshares and when we talked about the median and the entrance into Plowshares and where it ended and there's a huge safety benefit from medians and I would think that we would want a new median put in there with, by realigning it on the east side. I think for traffic safety and you're dealing with a 50 miles an hour speed limit there on 41, and cars that are going to be cutting that corner to beat the traffic, we all see what happens when people do that. How they cut into the westbound lanes so, without medians, so I would encourage the rest of this council to not scratch out 35 and leave it in place. In essence putting the median back in. 15 City Council Meeting Ay 12, 2004 • Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Other comments. Councilman Ayotte: Yeah, I'd like to make a comment. At the last council meeting, and I won't talk the specifics but I recollect very clearly the concentration on discussion about safety in a body of water. In a pool, and I kept on hearing we meet the minimum, we will meet the minimum requirements. Same thing here. It concerns me when the topic of safety comes up and I hear well MnDot as an agent says meet the minimum requirement. If a median does provide more safety and begrudgingly Paul pointed out that yeah, it's going to channel and it is going to make it safer to some degree, and Councilman Labatt who is a deputy sheriff, he says it's going to make it safer. When the Planning Commission says that, I tend to agree so even though it may not be popular, I think the median has to come back in. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Other comments. Councilman Lundquist: I would concur with the comments made to date. I think that the median was put there for a reason in the first place. We demonstrated along the other parts of West 78a, namely Galpin and Powers, that we have medians there so for a reason and, although I understand why the developer is pushing not, that I would support for safety reasons that being there as well. Otherwise I think that the addition of the review on the public safety officer should come before city staff as well. Other than that I support the proposal. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Councilman Peterson. Councilman Peterson: No further comments. Mayor Furlong: Okay. I guess I'm, without being against safety, you also have to look at certain levels. I think it'd be safer to have a signal there for everybody, and our challenge is try to balance the cost with the benefit and so while I can certainly support the median being there, I guess I wonder if we're fair in terms of requiring something to be there that we're hearing isn't necessary. Do we keep requiring things that aren't, that don't warrant it, especially if they can be put in later. So I can certainly go along with putting it in at this time but it would seem to me that maybe we're requiring something that isn't necessary. So, but overall while we've focused on this one item, I think bringing it back a little bit. I think the applicant has done a good job listening to staff, accommodating requests and really is going to help improve traffic flow across 41 by including this second entrance into their property and has demonstrated I think, the best example is public safety officer that's been at that intersection at Tanadoona. That wasn't required by the city. They're smart enough to recognize that it's not only safe for their members but for the rest of the traffic to have somebody out there and so I think that gives me a little comfort that, and I guess I want to, that they're going to do what's necessary to keep things safe. And second of all, just again, just I think it's nice to see applicants come forward and listen and seek to accommodate requests so with regard to perhaps some suggestive language on 38, and I'll defer to the attorney here between the words may and shall. It would make sense, given what you've heard tonight sir that the 16 City Council Meeting *y 12, 2004 • last phrase there, and the use of the public safety officer, strike the word shall. Insert the word may be required. Strike as needed and insert the words by the city, so it reads, and the use of public safety officer may be required by the city. Do you think that would serve the purpose that's been expressed tonight? Tom Scott: That would be fine Mayor. Mayor Furlong: Okay. So that would be my offer there. But overall, is there something you wanted to add? James Haugen: Yeah, I just wanted to make a comment in response to Councilman Lundquist's statement regarding the fact that the church didn't want this median there. That's simply not the case. MnDot had taken this out, or suggested that it wasn't necessary and so when we came back in, it was kind of removed and so we're up to the city as far as the safety issues. We're not going to make those calls so that was kind of taken out there and it was agreed. Whether it's there or not, we don't really care so whatever the decision is. So we're not pushing to take it out. Councilman Lundquist: Fair enough, thank you. Mayor Furlong: Then it will probably be in. Are there any other comments? Discussion. If not, is there a motion? Which I believe starts on. Councilman Labatt: Page 8, Mayor I will move that the City Council approves Planning Commission case 04-20, Site Plan Review for 166 space parking lot expansion, extension of temporary driveway with extension of West 78`" Street for the plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated May le subject to the following conditions, 1 through 38. Including 35. And amending conditions number 19, 36, and 38. Mayor Furlong: And 4. Councilman Labatt: The small one. And number 4. As amended in the memo dated July 12th from Bob Generous. Mayor Furlong: Very good. Thank you. Is there a second? Councilman Lundquist: Point of clarification? Mayor Furlong: Certainly. Councilman Lundquist: The amendment to 38 is the, as we discussed before? May be required by the city? Councilman Labatt: The Furlong amendment. Mayor Furlong: Yep, right. 17 City Council Meeting Aly 12, 2004 • Councilman Lundquist: Second. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is there discussion on the motion? Councilman Labatt moved, Councilman Lundquist seconded to approve Planning Case #04-20 Site Plan Review for a 166 space parking lot expansion, extension of temporary drive and extension of West 78th Street, plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated May 14, 2004, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around all existing landscaping at the edge of grading limits. 3. Any existing landscaping that is removed must be replaced when the parking lot construction is completed. 4. The landscape islands shall include mulch rings around the trees and be seeded or sodded elsewhere. 5. Overstory trees are required along West 78th St.; one every 30 feet. 6. Three accessible parking spaces must be added to the existing accessible parking area. 7. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). The applicant shall receive the City's approval of a wetland replacement plan prior to any wetland impact occurring. 8. A wetland buffer 0 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 10 feet) shall be maintained around all existing and proposed wetlands (wetland buffers proposed for PVC must maintain a width of 16.5 feet). Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and will pay the City $20 per sign. 9. All structures shall maintain a 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 10. The proposed development shall maintain existing runoff rates. Storm water calculations shall be submitted to staff to ensure runoff rates will not increase as a result of the proposed development. The applicant may work with the Arboretum to ensure their concerns are addressed. In City Council Meeting *y 12, 2004 11. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used for mitigation credit and storm water ponds. 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tvne of Sloe Time (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area Steeper than 3:1 7 days is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 13. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed 14. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, e.g. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering) and Army Corps of Engineers and comply with their conditions of approval. 15. All final plans must be signed by a registered civil engineer. 16. Use the latest version (2004) of the City's Standard Detail Plates. 17. The twin storm sewer culverts under West 78th Street must be RCP Class 5. 18. The existing driveway from Highway 41 to the existing homes in the northwest corner of the West 78th Street intersection must be removed and seeded or sodded. 19. The new painted median for the eastbound West 78th Street traffic on the east side of Highway 41 must be a raised concrete median with pedestrian ramps. 20. Install a temporary turnaround with barricades and a sign stating "This street to be extended" at the west end of new West 78th Street. 21. Provide a pedestrian ramp at the northeast corner of the new West 78th StreetI ighway 41 intersection for connection to the future city trail. 19 City Council Meeting *y 12, 2004 • 22. Incorporate the conditions of the MnDOT review letter dated June 1, 2004 into the plans. 23. Show all of the proposed grades for the new driveway to the existing home in the southeast corner of the site. 24. A permit for the proposed retaining wall is required to be obtained from the Building Department and the wall must be designed by a registered structural engineer. 25. Off-site grading will require a temporary easement or right -of -entry agreement from the Arboretum. 26. Should earthwork quantities not balance on site and materials need to be imported or exported from the site, the developer will need to supply the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval by staff. In addition, if material is proposed to be exported to another location in Chanhassen, it should be noted that the properties would be required to obtain an earthwork permit from the City. 27. All areas disturbed as a result of construction -related activity must be sodded and/or seeded and disc mulched within two weeks of disturbance. 28. A MnDOT drainage permit will be required. In addition, an NPDES permit and Watershed district permit will be required for the project grading. 29. Drainage and utility easements will be required over the wetland, pond, and the adjacent mitigation areas. An easement for access purposes will also be required for future maintenance of the wetlands. 30. Erosion control measures and site restoration must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Staff recommends that the City's Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to all existing wetlands and ponds. In addition, erosion control blankets should be used on all slopes 3:1 or greater with heights of 6' or more. 31. A financial security will be required to guarantee installation of the public improvements. 32. Bituminous curb and gutter must be added to the temporary driveway. 33. Prior to any future building expansion to the west side of the existing church building, the temporary access driveway from West 78th Street must be brought up to current standards in effect at the time." 20 City Council Meeting Joy 12, 2004 • 34. The raised median on the east side of 41, placed on West 781s currently to be removed and a new one placed in correct alignment with the extension westward of West 78`s. 35. A sidewalk be extended along the main driveway from the main entrance of the church on the east side to the northern end of the driveway where the new parking lot ends and sidewalks shall be extended to the east through the landscape islands at the south end of the new parking lot. 36. Additional landscaping along the north side on Tanadoona Drive 37. The church shall continue to use a public safety officer to monitor and direct traffic from the church for three months following completion of West 78`b Street. After three months of observations, traffic operations shall be re-evaluated and the use of public safety officers may be required by the City. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilman Labatt: Then also we approve Planning Commission #04-20 Wetland Alteration Permit to alter and fill wetlands on site, plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated May 14, 2004, subject to the following conditions 1 through 9. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is there a second? Councilman Peterson: Second. Mayor Furlong: Any discussion on that motion? Councilman Labatt moved, Councilman Peterson seconded to approve Planning Case #04-20 Wetland Alteration Permit to alter and fill wetlands on site, plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated May 14, 2004, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall develop an amendment to the wetland replacement plan to achieve the required 2:1 replacement without employing credits constructed during the first phase. 2. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). The applicant shall receive the City's approval of a wetland replacement plan prior to any wetland impact occurring. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. 3. A wetland buffer 0 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 10 feet) shall be maintained around all existing and proposed wetlands. (Wetland buffers proposed for PVC must maintain a width of 16.5 feet.) Wetland buffer areas shall be 21 City Council Meeting Aiy 12, 2004 preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and will pay the City $20 per sign. 4. All structures shall maintain a 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 5. The proposed development shall maintain existing runoff rates. Storm water calculations shall be submitted to staff to ensure runoff rates will not increase as a result of the proposed development. The applicant may work with the Arboretum to ensure their concerns are addressed. 6. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used for mitigation credit and storm water ponds. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tyne of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area Steeper than 3:1 7 days is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 8. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 9. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, e.g. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering) and Army Corps of Engineers and comply with their conditions of approval." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. REOUEST FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 13,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH REQUESTS FOR A PARKING SETBACK VARIANCE AND A SIGN VARIANCE ON 1.9 ACRES ZONED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 5 AND GALPIN BOULEVARD, BEAR CREEK CAPITAL, LLC, AND CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT. LLC. CVS/PHARMACY, PLANNING CASE NO. 04-21. 22 r-, LJ CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES JUNE 15, 2004 Chairman Sacchet called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 64- Zo t is MEMBERS PRESENT: Uli Sacchet, Dan Keefe, Rich Slagle, Steve Lillehaug and Bethany Tjomhom MEMBERS ABSENT: Craig Claybaugh and Kurt Papke STAFF PRESENT: Bob Generous, Senior Planner; Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner; and Matt Saam, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC HEARING: SECONDARY ACCESS TO HIGHWAY 41, AND A WETLAND ALTERATION Public Present: Name Address Dan Russ 51 Choctaw Circle James Haugen 7800 Bavaria Road, Victoria Mark Ekb 3360 Bavaria Road, Chaska Maren Christopher 7311 Dogwood Road Bruce Carlson 1440 Bavaria Road Peter Brandt 7570 Dogwood Road Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Lillehaug asked for clarification regarding the statement that Dogwood Road may be extended to the west in the future. He questioned the need to remove the median on West 78`" Street and retaining the services of a traffic engineer to look at the proposed intersection and layout. Commissioner Slagle asked about the cost to build and remove the median on West 780, Street, traffic flow and sidewalk circulation in the parking lots. Commissioner Keefe asked for clarification regarding landscaping along Tanadoona Drive and Highway 41, and signage. Commissioner Tjornhom asked about MnDot'S recommendation to remove the existing driveway and clarification regarding the easement with the Arboretum. Chairman Sacchet asked for clarification on wetland mitigation, tree inventory, whether there will be a fence on the retaining wall just south of the new road towards 41, curb and Planning Commission Meting — June 15, 2004 • gutter along the temporary roadway, right tum lanes on Highway 41 and improvements to the intersection. Commissioner Slagle asked about the trail connection from this development to the other side of Highway 41 and costs of the road and intersection improvements. Commissioner Lillehaug asked about plans for the west end of West 78a' Street. Commissioner Keefe asked for clarification on the statement at the bottom of page 5 and top of page 6 where it talks about the Arboretum's concern with runoff rates for the culverts. Dan Russ, 51 Choctaw Circle, who is on the Construction Committee with Westwood Community Church, addressed the issues of landscaping, removal of the median, the easement with the Arboretum, and the tum around. Commissioner Slagle suggested a sidewalk system for the northern parking lot. Commissioner Lillehaug asked the applicant to elaborate on the two accesses into the site and parking requirements. Commissioner Keefe asked about the need for traffic control with the additional access. Chairman Sacchet opened the public hearing. Maren Christopher, 7311 Dogwood Road expressed concern about the possible connection with West 780' Street to Dogwood Road and Crimson Bay Road. Chairman Sacchet closed the public hearing. After discussion by commissioners, the following motions were made. Slagle moved, Tjornhom seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 04-20 Site Plan Review for a 143-space�arking lot expansion, extension of temporary drive and extension of West 78 Street, plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated May 14, 2004, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around all existing landscaping at the edge of grading limits. 3. Any existing landscaping that is removed must be replaced when the parking lot construction is completed. 4. The landscape islands shall be filled with wood chips. 5. Overstory trees are required along West 78th St.; one every 30 feet. 6. Three accessible parking spaces must be added to the existing accessible parking area. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). The applicant shall receive the City's approval of a wetland replacement plan prior to any wetland impact occurring. 8. A wetland buffer 0 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 10 feet) shall be maintained around all existing and proposed wetlands (wetland buffers proposed `A Planning Commission Ivileting — June 15, 2004 • for PVC must maintain a width of 16.5 feet). Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and will pay the City $20 per sign. 9. All structures shall maintain a 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 10. The proposed development shall maintain existing runoff rates. Storm water calculations shall be submitted to staff to ensure runoff rates will not increase as a result of the proposed development. The applicant may work with the Arboretum to ensure their concerns are addressed. 11. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used for mitigation credit and storm water ponds. 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: TyW of Sloe Time (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area Steeper than 3:1 7 days is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 13. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 14. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, e.g. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering) and Army Corps of Engineers and comply with their conditions of approval. 15. All final plans must be signed by a registered civil engineer. 16. Use the latest version (2004) of the City's Standard Detail Plates. 17. The twin storm sewer culverts under West 78th Street must be RCP Class 5. Planning Commission 1Vlleting — June 15, 2004 • 18. The existing driveway from Highway 41 to the existing homes in the northwest corner of the West 78th Street intersection must be removed and seeded or sodded. 19. Include concrete driveway aprons and pedestrian ramps for both proposed driveways off of new West 78th Street. 20. The new painted median for the eastbound West 78th Street traffic on the east side of Highway 41 must be a raised concrete median with pedestrian ramps. 21. Install a temporary turnaround with barricades and a sign stating "This street to be extended" at the west end of new West 78th Street. 22. Provide a pedestrian ramp at the northeast corner of the new West 78th Street/Highway 41 intersection for connection to the future city trail. 23. Incorporate the conditions of the MnDOT review letter dated June 1, 2004 into the plans. 24. Show all of the proposed grades for the new driveway to the existing home in the southeast corner of the site. 25. A permit for the proposed retaining wall is required to be obtained from the Building Department and the wall must be designed by a registered structural engineer. 26. Off-site grading will require a temporary easement or right -of -entry agreement from the Arboretum. 27. Should earthwork quantities not balance on site and materials need to be imported or exported from the site, the developer will need to supply the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval by staff. In addition, if material is proposed to be exported to another location in Chanhassen, it should be noted that the properties would be required to obtain an earthwork permit from the City. 28. All areas disturbed as a result of construction -related activity must be sodded and/or seeded and disc mulched within two weeks of disturbance. 29. A MnDOT drainage permit will be required. In addition, an NPDES permit and Watershed district permit will be required for the project grading. 30. Drainage and utility easements will be required over the wetland, pond, and the adjacent mitigation areas. An easement for access purposes will also be required for future maintenance of the wetlands. 31. Erosion control measures and site restoration must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Staff recommends that E Planning Commission feting — June 15, 2004 • the City's Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to all existing wetlands and ponds. In addition, erosion control blankets should be used on all slopes 3:1 or greater with heights of 6' or more. 32. A financial security will be required to guarantee installation of the public improvements. 33. Bituminous curb and gutter must be added to the temporary driveway. 34. Prior to any future building expansion to the west side of the existing church building, the temporary access driveway from West 78th Street must be brought up to current standards in effect at the time." 35. The raised median on the east side of TH 41, placed on West 78`h currently to be removed and a new one placed in correct alignment with the extension westward of West 78`h. 36. A sidewalk be extended along the main driveway from the main entrance of the church on the east side to the northern end of the driveway where the new parking lot ends and two diagonal walkways similar to the northwest parking lot. 37. Additional landscaping along the north side on Tanadoona Drive. 38. Require public safety officer to continue working the two intersections as directed by public safety. All voted in favor, except Lillehaug who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 4 to 1. Commissioner Lillehaug voted in opposition because he felt the project was premature without completion of a traffic study. Slagle moved, Keefe seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 04-20 Wetland Alteration Permit to alter and fill wetlands on site, plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated May 14, 2004, subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall develop an amendment to the wetland replacement plan to achieve the required 2:1 replacement without employing credits constructed during the first phase. 2. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). The applicant shall receive the City's approval of a wetland replacement plan prior to any wetland impact occurring. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Planning Commission Sting — June 15, 2004 • Covenants for Replacement Wetland. 3. A wetland buffer 0 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 10 feet) shall be maintained around all existing and proposed wetlands. (Wetland buffers proposed for PVC must maintain a width of 16.5 feet.) Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and will pay the City $20 per sign. 4. All structures shall maintain a 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 5. The proposed development shall maintain existing runoff rates. Storm water calculations shall be submitted to staff to ensure runoff rates will not increase as a result of the proposed development. The applicant may work with the Arboretum to ensure their concerns are addressed. 6. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used for mitigation credit and storm water ponds. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slone Time (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area Steeper than 3:1 7 days is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 8. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 9. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, e.g. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering) and Army Corps of Engineers and comply with their conditions of approval." All voted in favor, except Lillehaug who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of4to1. Planning Commission feting — June 15, 2004 • Commissioner Lillehaug's reasoning for opposing were the same as above, believing the project is premature. Chairman Sacchet summarized the Planning Commission's issues as being, he felt everyone welcomed the additional access to the site but had concerns that the traffic study had not been completed and wanted to make sure that was donexrior to going to council. There was concern with signalizing the intersection of West 78 and Highway 41 and adding a stipulation that the applicant bear some of that cost. There is the recurring comment that comes from the neighborhood to the west along the lake that they don't want more roads going in there, which is somewhat in conflict with the comprehensive plan which envisions West 78`" connecting into that area. It is important for all the road alterations on TH 41 to follow the full standards of road construction from MnDot with turning lanes and so forth. There were concerns about the safety of pedestrians crossing TH 41 and wanting to make sure there's sufficient sidewalks on either side accessing the new parking lot area with crosswalks across the islands and a walkway to the end of the parking lot. Additional landscape buffering towards Tanadoona Drive and the absence of a tree study showing which trees will be cut. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 13.000 SOUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH REQUESTS FOR PARKING AND SIGN VARIANCES ON 1.9 ACRES ZONED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 5 AND GALPIN Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Tjornhom asked for clarification on the drive thru regarding the hours, noise, speakers, and lighting. Commissioner Keefe had questions relating to the amount of parking requirements, and traffic circulation for the drive thru, berming and landscaping along Highway 5, and signage. Commissioner Ullehaug had concerns with parking setbacks, driveway access and the possibility of cars stacking up onto Galpin Boulevard, and the width of the private drive between this development and Kwik Trip. Commissioner Slagle had a question regarding the size of the building on this site and traffic circulation. Chairman Sacchet had concerns with the traffic circulation and parking, and clarification on the findings in the staff report connected with the variance requests. Bill Tippmann, Vice President of Bear Creek Capital, provided background information on CVS and their developments throughout the United States and in the Twin Cities area. He addressed concerns brought up about the traffic circulation and stacking at the pick-up window. Commissioner Slagle asked for more details on how the pharmacy drop off and pick-up drive thru lanes will work and if the applicant had considered putting the drive thru in a different location. Commissioner Lillehaug asked the applicant about berming and landscaping, and screening of the roof top equipment. Commissioner Keefe asked about the hours of operation, and the location of the entrance to the store. Chairman Sacchet stated he was still struggling with the drive thru location and operation. He then opened the public hearing. No one was present to speak and the public hearing was closed. After commissioners discussion, the following motion was made. 7 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 15, 2004 Chairman Sacchet called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Uli Sacchet, Dan Keefe, Rich Slagle, Steve Lillehaug and Bethany Tjornhom MEMBERS ABSENT: Craig Claybaugh and Kurt Papke STAFF PRESENT: Bob Generous, Senior Planner; Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner; and Matt Saam, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC HEARING: OFFICE AND INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT, OI, LOCATED AT 3121 WESTWOOD DRIVE (WEST OF TH 41 AT TANADOONA DRIVE) -PLANNING CASE NO. 04-20* Public Present: Name Address Dan Russ James Haugen Mark Ekb Maren Christopher Bruce Carlson Peter Brandt 51 Choctaw Circle 7800 Bavaria Road, Victoria 3360 Bavaria Road, Chaska 7311 Dogwood Road 1440 Bavaria Road 7570 Dogwood Road Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Sacchet: Thank you Bob. Questions from staff. Any? You want to jump in Steve? Start with Rich? Slagle: No, no, Steve can go ahead. Lillehaug: Bob, you indicated that this will possibly be extended to Dogwood Road in the future, out to the west. Will it also be, will that be connected to Crimson Bay Road and then onto Trunk Highway 5 or will that remain separate? Planning Commission sting — June 15, 2004 • Generous: That would be staff's recommendation that we make that connection eventually, as those properties develop. Lillehaug: So then really in essence this frontage road in the future will most likely, possibly connect back up with Trunk Highway 5? Generous: Yes. That's what our comp plan would like to see is that connection. Lillehaug: Okay. I'm not too sure where to begin here. We don't have current traffic volumes proposed or anything from MnDot, was that correct Matt? Saam: That's correct. Lillehaug: Okay. Saam: For West 78"' Street. Lillehaug: For the west leg, right. Saam: Yes. Lillehaug: I posed a couple of these questions earlier to staff and I want to hit on one that's most important I guess in my mind, and the question would be, is the median that we're removing on West 78`s Street. We just put that median, I mean that's a brand new frontage road and we have medians, I mean they're brand new medians. I've got a huge line of justification why we would need a median there. It appears that staff and the developer plan on taking that median out. Why do we want to go to a lesser standard? In this case. I mean it seems like we're going the wrong direction. We're not, to me it's not the time we should be retrofitting an intersection in here. I mean this is a brand new frontage road. It appears it's going to connect back all the way to the west to Trunk Highway 5. I mean there's possibly going to be through movements through that intersection in the future that may have some higher levels than some of the other intersections that have medians on it. I guess my concerns and questions is, are we sure we want to get rid of that median in there? And I know MnDot's reviewed this but maybe not the right people at MnDot have reviewed this at this time. So can staff comment on that? Saam: Sure. Staff, as you said met with MnDot along with the developer's engineer. We also sent this plan over to their review agency as we do with all developments that are proposed along state highways. And both of them came back with basically the same response that removal of the median is fine with them. They don't see issues with delineation and channelization of traffic. Going east to west there. One thing I guess I'd like to point out is when you go west of Highway 41, we as staff have always kind of thought that's more a lower volume type road. You've got two residential cul-de-sacs and the lake. It's not like traffic from Victoria's going to be coming through there. At least in our mind, and if we would connect up with Crimson Bay, we've always 2 ' Planning Commission Wing — June 15, 2004 • envisioned that the Highway 5, the existing Highway 5 access for Crimson Bay would be a right-inhight-out then. So it's not like we'll, in our eyes be getting the truck traffic through this intersection. It will just be another way out for the Dogwood Crimson Bay folks, and then of course Westwood Church on Sundays and whatever other days they have activities. So we're sure willing to look at it again and push MnDot a little harder on you know, do we see any need for a median with upgrades of 41 in the future or anything like that, but at this point they said they don't see the need for it. We've reviewed it at staff, both the City Engineer and I have and really the only condition that we've come up with is what I've added in there is the free right for the traffic going north on 41 onto eastbound West 78`h. They have a painted island. We'd like to see that raised concrete island so. Lillehaug: You hit on another question I guess I had is the reconstruction of 41. Have we or are there plans that we can look at to coordinate this intersection? I mean because I want to make a comment on it. I think this frontage road is maybe a couple years old. We, taxpayers, city, state just paid to put a median in there. Now we're taking it back out and we're not planning on replacing it. I want to try to help and make sure everyone's aware that 41 is being reconstructed and hopefully we're looking at those plans and coordinating this intersection with those plans. Saam: I'll defer to Bob on the 41 improvements but it's been my understanding, maybe I jumped the gun. Really that's not in the MnDot 20 year plan yet. There are you know talk of future 41 upgrade and river crossing and all that but, I think Bob's on a committee and it's 20 plus years out so. Generous: It doesn't show up yet. Lillehaug: Okay. Well that answers that. Now let me try to hurry along here. I think that's all the questions I have for right now. Thanks. Oh, one more if I can. On page 7 of the staff report, you indicate the city has retained the services of a traffic engineer to look at the proposed intersection and layout. We have a plan in front of us with the proposed section. With the proposed intersection and layout. Are we saying we're having a traffic engineer look at this after we already have the plans for this intersection? Saam: Yep, we've hired the services of a traffic engineer to make sure that based on future traffic and church anticipated traffic, that what we're doing at that intersection, as you alluded to, is right and that that intersection's going to work and function with the expected traffic. Ullehaug: Okay, thanks. Sacchet: Alright, you can ask more questions if you have more later. Anybody else want to jump in? Slagle: I've got a few. 3 Planning Commission Ating — June 15, 2004 • Sacchet: Go ahead Rich. Slagle: Bob or Matt, the comments that were just brought up by Commissioner Lillehaug on that median. Do you have a ballpark figure as to what it cost to build that median and what it will cost to remove that median? Just ballpark. Saam: No, but possibly the applicant. I know they're doing cost estimates on that. They may have a figure on the removal of it. But I don't off the top of my head. Sacchet: The applicant pays for the removal. Saam: Yes. Yeah, and our reasoning there is that even, whether it's a driveway or a public street, we want those accesses to line up so those intersection improvements would need to be done. Regardless. Slagle: Okay. Bob, this might be a question for you. Traffic flow of the additional parking lot. One ways, both ways, do you know? Generous: Both ways. Slagle: Both ways, okay. And then question of sidewalks to what I will call the east and now the proposed northeast or north parking lot. I don't see any sidewalks similar to the one that is directly northwest of the church. Do we have any of those? I mean I'm just trying to think if you're parking you know in that northern lot. Is there a sidewalk that folks can walk along to get to the church? Do we know? Generous: Not for any ... length, no. Slagle: Okay, so hypothetically if you're up on the northeast corner of that new parking lot you are walking through a parking lot. Generous: Through a parking lot. Slagle: Okay. I think that's it for now. Thanks. Keefe: I have a couple. Landscaping on the Tanadoona Drive side. What are we doing in regards to that or what are we requiring? Generous: There's very minimal landscaping on that Tanadoona Drive itself. The primary landscaping are those island areas that they have in there, which is uniform with the rest of the project. Jill reviewed this. She didn't have, bring up any issues on it. Keefe: And how far from the, just from Tanadoona does that parking lot start? 60? 70? Generous: Yeah, 65 feet. !l Planning Commission Wing — June 15, 2004 • Keefe: Alright. And at the entrance where 41 connects with West 78h, there's a fair grade change from 41 to, up onto the West 78"' and then there's a number of trees that line that road, you know 41 along there. Is it proposed that a lot of those trees would come out or I'm just curious. Generous: Within the roadway I'm sure they'll come out. Saam: Yes, and then even a few. They're proposing right now, we mentioned in the staff report a few trees on the northeast corner of the Arboretum property would be required to come out, and that's just for tying back in with the grading and the sloping, and to avoid like a wall out in the right-of-way which I'm sure MnDot wouldn't allow. Keefe: And then the proposed sign that goes in there. It's similar to the other one on Tanadoona, is that right? The proposed signage for Westwood. Generous: I don't know that. Saam: Maybe the applicant, you can ask him. Keefe: Alright, that's it. Sacchet: Any questions Bethany? Tjornhom: MnDot advised moving an existing driveway for this project. Does that driveway, is that a private driveway or does that driveway belong to the church? Generous: It's the houses that the church purchased for the access. Tjornhom: Okay, so there's no other party involved in? Generous: No. Tjomhom: And then did they work out their easement they needed with the Arboretum? Generous: I don't know that they have yet. Saam: That's probably an applicant question. Tjornhom: Okay. Sacchet: I've got a few questions too. First of all, staff report page 4 talks about how the wetland credits work, and it says the applicant cannot draw on what was done previously because they didn't declare it as such. Is that accurate? Generous: Yes. Planning Commission Oeting — June 15, 2004 • Sacchet: So they basically have to do a little more wetland mitigation to the tune of 13,000-14,000 square feet. Do we know where they would do that? Would they just make the one that they're doing a little bigger? Generous: Yes, they'd make the ones on site larger. Sacchet: And they're okay with that? Well I guess I can ask them themselves about that. Trees. It was interesting. You brought up trees here. I don't see any tree inventory or indication where there are trees. Are we not touching any of the existing trees? Are there no trees in the way? Generous: Not on the parking lot portion. As part of the West 78"' Street I'm sure there are trees. Sacchet: Well yeah, there's a canopy part and we don't know how much gets cut there. It doesn't seem to be very much, is that why it's not looked at? Saam: I'm not sure why Jill didn't comment on that. I guess I never asked her really if she had issue with the trees that were coming out on West 78's Street, so that's something good we might follow up on. Sacchet: Well it's hard to preserve a tree in the middle of the roadway but it'd still be nice to know what we're actually cutting down. There's a very sizable retaining wall just south of the new road towards 41. That's where it is, right? Is that okay? I mean it says up to 9 feet. It's pretty close to the roadway. Will there be a fence or? Saam: You know it's on the side opposite the trail. I guess that's something we could add in as a condition to add that fence. Sacchet: Safety wise we wouldn't probably, I mean actually even more so if cars go over that edge, it wouldn't be very funny. Saam: Yeah, I know adjacent to trails they require that. I'm not sure as a standard the building, it's governed by the building department. They permit it. I'm not sure if as a standard they require a fence. Sacchet: Okay. Well if the trail would be there it might be fenced but since it's next to a road, it might be a guardrail. Saam: No, yeah. A guardrail, something of that nature would be, yeah I agree. Sacchet: Okay. So that's something we need to look at. Just temporary parking drive. That's an interesting phenomena there. Temporary road. It's my understanding from the staff report that staff thinks it should be done with curb and gutter. The applicant proposes to do it without curb or gutter with their justification that it's temporary. Planning Commission sting — June 15, 2004 • Saam: Yeah, technically if you follow the letter of the code, all driveways such as the West 78th Street one, if it was a public, has to be curb and gutter. Pavement to this use. But in talking with the developer, with the church, they plan on doing other parking expansions. They're not sure if the exact alignment of the driveway is going to stay the same so they'd like to not have to invest the money in concrete curb and gutter right now. They have agreed to put in bituminous curb and gutter, which I know we've done in the other certain areas as a temporary measure. And then we also said we'd add a condition, if and when you develop west of the existing church, then at that point you'll have to bring up that driveway to current standards, which would be the permanent. Sacchet: And you're fine with the tar curb at this point. Saam: I guess yeah. We felt that was. Sacchet: That's a good balance yeah. You touched on the driveway for the house. Another condition that MnDot brought into the picture is that the turning lanes on 41, the right turn lanes I guess that is, must be longer and more tapered and all there's enough space for all that? Saam: Yes. In my mind there is. The developer might not be that happy to do it but yeah there is. And I know they want to have discussions with MnDot on seeing if they can do it... Sacchet: And that is all the developer's financial responsibility? Saam: Yes, and that's a standard MnDot the 300 feet with the taper. Sacchet: In terms of the financial responsibility for this road, basically the developer does everything except the city pays the difference from smaller roads to the bigger road. Is that? Saam: That's basically it, yeah. Oversizing from a 26. Sacchet: The developer is taking care of all the fixing of the intersection and all these tum lanes and islands and what have you. Okay. I just want to be very clear about that. That's all my questions. Slagle: I've got just a couple more. Sacchet: Yeah, go ahead. Slagle: I apologize for not asking about the trail. As I'm looking at the plans here I guess Matt it runs on the north side of West 78th Street, on the west of 41. It will go all the way to the new development to the west, correct? And probably connect to Crimson Bay and Dogwood perhaps. 7 Planning Commission Oting — June 15, 2004 • Saam: When we upgrade those, the plan is that sidewalk and/or trail at that time. Slagle: Okay. And if we go back to the development across 41, Plowshares. If I'm not mistaken we had a trail coming out of the development on the north end of West 78"' to 41 and then going north on the east side of 41 connecting with Longacres and what not. My question is, is how are people to connect to the trail on the other side of 41? Is it going to be marked as a crossing? Because I don't think we have lights and I think stop signs are only on West 78"'. Right? So is it going to be sort of like a Powers Boulevard where people look both ways and hope there's a gap and. Saam: For the interim and, unless a light would be warranted in the future, yeah. That's what it would have to be at this point. Slagle: Okay. And then my last question raised by the Chair on the intersection and the bearing of the cost. If I go back 2 years ago when there was discussions of potential development to the west of this property. There was some discussion as to sharing of costs and so forth. I guess my question is, are the future developers to the west, can I ask why they're not incurring some costs for this. Saam: We're, we as the city are looking at ways to share that cost. The city's portion. To see who benefits basically from the extension of the public road. The property immediately to the west, which is I think the one you're referring to, that's about the only one that could benefit. So we're exploring those options. Right now but that's really not this applicant's issue. It's you know city and Westwood are doing this and then it's kind of on our shoulders as a city to see if, can we assess our cost then to other benefiting properties. Slagle: So I guess in hearing that, I'm going to make an assumption that I trust will be fair to all parties, that if there is some benefit realized or gained, that that will be appropriated if you will or requested from them. Saam: Yes, definitely and then we won't, I mean we're bound by the law you know we can't. Slagle: I understand. Saam: Assess any more than we can show true benefit for so. Slagle: Okay. Sacchet: Steve. Lillehaug: I've got one more. The west end of 78"' Street. I don't see anywhere where there's a turn around plan for that, i.e. temporary cul-de-sac or something like that. Do we have something in the mix for that or am I just not seeing it? 91 Planning Commission Sting — June 15, 2004 • Saam: I know it was mentioned. It may not, I'll look to see if it didn't make the conditions. We intend to put that in with a sign. I could have swore we had that, with the temporary barricade sign saying this street to be extended in the future. Sacchet: ... turn around I believe. Saam: It doesn't? Sacchet: I'm not sure. I don't recall. Generous: Condition 21. On page 9. Lillehaug: Okay. Sacchet: So it is in there? Saam: We miss a couple but not all of them. Slagle: You do a great job. Keefe: I've got one more question in relation to, on the bottom of page 5 and top of page 6 you talk about the runoff rates for the culverts, and apparently the Arboretum has a concern about the culverts running. Can you clarify, it says in the last sentence that the applicant may want to work with them. I'm not clear on what all that means. Saam: Let me just give you a little background. These comments under storm water management come from our Water Resource Coordinator. Her comments a lot of times are similar to mine. Basically this applicant, like every developer is required to meet the runoff rates for storm water leaving it's property to match the existing conditions for the post development so they're required to meet the existing runoff rates, whether, I mean they want to work with the Arboretum or not, we're going to make sure that they meet what's going towards the Arboretum now. Keefe: Right, so if the Arboretum has a concern, as long as they meet the same as they currently are, then there's really no change correct? Saam: Exactly. Exactly. And usually it gets better, meaning less water being dumped on a neighbor so to speak. Sacchet: Okay? Is that for questions from staff. Alright. With that I'd like to invite the applicant to come forward to see if you have anything more to add. Give us a little overview if you'd like. And if you want to state your name and address for the record please. 0 Planning Commission sting — June 15, 2004 • Dan Russ: Sure. My name's Dan Russ. I'm on the construction and committee for the Westwood, Westwood Community Church. I live at 51 Choctaw Circle in Chanhassen. I'm a resident of Chan. I think there were a number of questions brought up that I think Matt had addressed. I think there was three that we want to kind of help you out with. First was on the landscaping on the, what would be the north end of the parking lot between there and Tanadoona. There is existing landscaping that was required during the first site plan so there is already a buffer of trees, shrubs that were required under the original construction so we're not going to disturb any of that and we're adding additional on the end of the parking lot. And then the landscaping is going to be consistent with the existing landscaping that's in there with the grove of cherry trees that are in the islands now so that will continue forward. The median cut that was talked about. That's not driven by the church. You know we're paying for it but that's not drive by us. I mean our preference would be to leave that intersection alone but city staff s requiring us to make an alignment of that based on where our property lines are and what we're dealing with with the Arboretum, we don't have any additional property to the south to make that median and intersection line line up so we've got to turn the other intersection. I think that's what's driving that cost. We'd love nothing better than to leave that alone and not have to pay for that but I think the traffic people are telling us what's the best for that intersection. We'll go by what they say. And the easement, I believe there was a question of the easement with the Arboretum. We presently own the two houses on the corner. The driveway easement is there so we control that easement through the ownership of that property so we don't anticipate an easement issue with the Arboretum other than potentially grading when we're doing some construction there in the corner so there's a construction grading easement that is probably needed. Other than that I don't have really much other to add then the church is growing. Oh, the turn around. I'm sorry. There was a question on turn around. I think our proposal, or one of our conversations earlier with the city staff was that we would merely terminate the road at the driveway point so the turn around could be used as our driveway. There is no reason for anybody to drive up that road. The church is looking into that as a safety issue for parking at night or partying or whatever might happen on a dead end road. It would be lit with, per city standards but we just as soon not have any traffic up there as well so we'd just as soon have it terminate at our property. That would be the, our resolution to that. Sacchet: Does staff have a comment about that? Because I wonder, I mean when that road needs to be further extended, how that would be handled. Saam: And I think maybe we're not talking about the same thing. It sounds like Mr. Russ is talking about a tum around up in the development. We're talking about a temporary tum around at your property line. It's pretty standard for us. Dan Russ: Like a hammer head or a cul-de-sac? Saam: Yeah, temporary cul-de-sac, yep. Planning Commission Ating — June 15, 2004 • Dan Russ: Whatever. I mean one of the proposals that we talked about at one point I thought was, we would terminate the mad... Sacchet: I'm trying to ask whether that is from a city viewpoint whether that's a viable option but you understand what he's saying? Dan Russ: Yeah. Sacchet: End the mad where the driveway goes off. You have like a hammer head turn around. Saam: Yeah, for public accesses where you're going to be maintaining it, and I guess our standard is to have a cul-de-sac type. Sacchet: Have it all the way because then it becomes an issue when we need the connection, how it gets built and how the costs get shared and all that. Saam: And that would be part of the city's cost... Sacchet: Cost to go past their driveway? Saam: Yeah. Sacchet: Okay, but we would want to do it now? I mean if the city costs anyhow, it could be questioned whether that's even smart. Saam: Excuse me? Sacchet: If the city pays for extending that mad from their driveway to the end of the property line, which basically goes nowhere, why would we want to do it now and not wait until it actually goes somewhere? Saam: You're saying basically wait until the development to the west comes in and then build the public street. Sacchet: Nobody's going to use that road at this point. Saam: We could look at it, yeah. We could definitely look at that. It's something we haven't thought of. Sacchet: Because if it's city cost ... but if it's city cost anyhow, then it would be for the benefit of the adjoining property and when they need it, they would have an interest and they'll pay you for it. And nobody's going to use it now, logically it would make more sense that way. Then that would actually accommodate what you're saying. 11 Planning Commission ting —June 15, 2004 • Dan Russ: Correct. I mean our need is for the road, the church at this point. We had looked at an earlier option where we would bring our driveway in on the eastern half of the property to accommodate future buildings that are going to come up here and future parking lots. This is the logical point for us to get to at some point and as long as we're doing it, crossing the, doing the mitigation, all the things we're doing, we might as well do it. Sacchet: You're envisioning that the access would be pretty much in that, staying in that place then. Dan Russ: Within 10 or 15 feet of where we're at there based on our future sanctuary and we have a parking lot, correct. Sacchet: Anyhow, are there more questions of the applicant? Slagle: I've got one. Sacchet: Go ahead Rich. Slagle: Dan, if we can touch upon the, what I'll call the sidewalks. That parking lot directly to the north of the main entrance, where you've got the diagonal cross overs if you will for people to walk, I know the one to the east we don't have that but I know we have the sidewalk coming from the side of the building but do you feel by adding that northern parking lot and not having any type of what I'm going to call safe passage. Dan Russ: Pedestrian walkway. Slagle: Yeah. Is that a concern? Dan Russ: You know we haven't thought about it in that light and we probably should. If I remember right... You know the way those driveways, or the parking lots were designed, there were collectors down at this point and the sidewalks either into the lower level church or up to the upper level. Slagle: If I can make a suggestion. Where that sidewalk terminates, the one that comes out of the main entrance and goes northeast. If there was a way to carry that on along that island if you will, or the east side of the driveway northward. Yep, going up there. And that's where we typically have guards, and then you would carry it up again, and then possibly have one or two, you know one in, centered of the islands. Yep, so people can make their way, yep. I mean I just know with two little kids, it makes it easier when you're on a sidewalk. Dan Russ: Well we want to do what's right, that's safe so. Slagle: So you guys would be open to that? 12 Planning Commission Sting—June 15, 2004 • Dan Russ: I think so. I think we should do that. Slagle; Okay. Is staff okay with that? Dan Russ: I would say we'd follow that lead. Good point. Slagle: Okay. That's it. Lillehaug: I do have a question. Sacchet: Go ahead Steve. Lillehaug: I'm really having problems, not with anything that you're doing on your site. It really has to do with this frontage road and intersection, so could you help me here and explain why are we putting this mad in. I think you hit on it a little bit that you need a, you want a second outlet for safety reasons. Is it generating more because the, how do you say it, the Tanadoona intersection is very inadequate? Can you comment a little on that please. Dan Russ: Sure. The original site plan that was approved in '02 I believe, allowed us to have the amount of parking that we have in Phase I, for the first building with access on Tanadoona with an upgrade on Tanadoona. The traffic study that we did indicated I think at that point that if we built any more building or added more square footage, increased people on there, we were going to need a secondary access. So the master site plan, correct me if I'm wrong, was approved with one access point. Any additional buildings would require a second access point. At this point we need additional parking to handle what we've are going to find the increase in our worship services in worshippers during the Sunday service so that's why we're adding another 140 spots to allow us to add another service for the holidays. That's typically when it ramps up. And with that, we're going to need that secondary street. It's certainly going to have to come when we come back for our gymnasium, recreational building. That is next on our list. Hopefully we're back here in the next 6 months to a year talking about that project, and that would drive West 786 Street need as well, so we're looking for a multiple purpose here. One is to get a little bit ahead of the curve. Two is to add a secondary access for the people that are there, which will allow us easier flow in and out of there and we won't have to have the county and the state, the highway patrol people on 41 in the rain, in the dark dodging cars, trying to get people to turn in and out of there. Works fine in the daylight but our evening services are getting difficult for public safety so we'd like to run them in a different entrance that's a little more safe and little more controlled. Lillehaug: Okay. One more question. Are you saying right now that your parking is inadequate for just your services and building alone as it stands? Dan Russ: I wouldn't use the word inadequate. Lillehaug: Well use another term. 13 Planning Commission Ming — June 15, 2004 • Dan Russ: We now operate some shuttle buses to and from, offer rural parking that allows us to schedule our service times a little closer together to accommodate worship and Sunday school classes as such. And with more parking it will ease that burden. It's difficult to accommodate 2,500 to 3,000 people on a Sunday morning when you need facilities and staff and teachers that come and park, and then their cars don't move for 3 hours when you have regular worshippers coming in and out so the parking gets tight. During the week there isn't, you know we're grossly over parked during the week for our normal church operations, but the Sunday services gets tight. So the additional parking is a definitely will help us in our existing facility and will allow us to move forward into the next phase. Lillehaug: Okay, thank you. Keefe: I've got kind of a follow on question to that. In regards to, I've been personal witness to the traffic person out there and we're adding a second entrance to this now. At least in your look at this intersection as proposed, I mean do you still think there's going to be a need for some sort of traffic control on Sunday mornings even with the addition of this? Dan Russ: That I can't tell you. I'm not qualified to make that call, although I can tell you that MnDot is requiring us to put a 300 some odd foot right hand decel turning lane and 150 foot acceleration lane, which we don't have at Tanadoona now. So you're able to slow down, pull over, take a right hand turn to come in. Keefe: So that's someone coming down from the north, right. Dan Russ: From the north on 41. Keefe: Right. Dan Russ: The width of the intersection I think allows for a turning lane in the center of 41, or not. Saam: Yeah, left. Dan Russ: A left hand tum land so coming north... Keefe: So there's actually two lanes going north on 41. Is that correct, at the new. Saam: There will be a dedicated left and then one lane for going. Keefe: Bypass, okay. Saam: Yeah. 14 Planning Commission Oting — June 15, 2004 • Dan Russ: And with MnDot, you know MnDot's reviewed it. They said that based on our traffic counts and the needs, it doesn't require a light at this point. There isn't enough traffic on that intersection. On either intersection to require a light. Keefe: I guess kind of a one point time, 9:00-10:00 or whenever. Dan Russ: Yeah, from 9:300 to noon it gets a little tough and hopefully with two access points it's going to cut it half. So I don't know the answer to that, whether or not we'll need some assistance with state or county. Public safety. Slagle: Can I just dovetail on that if I may. And Dan, I appreciate your honesty because obviously none of us know for sure what the need will be from a safety standpoint, but I'm thinking, and staff help me here. When we're looking at an intersection that's going to have two stop lights, or excuse me, two stop signs, obviously the majority of the traffic would be coming from the east trying to cross 41 to go to the service to the new entrance. You have cars coming from the south on 41 taking a left going straight. You have them coming from the north, you know going south and maybe some taking a right probably. Although if they're coming from the north they might be doing the Tanadoona. Dan Russ: That would be my guess. Is people from the north would stay in the Tanadoona Drive because that's the first drive they get to, and people coming from the south hearing north are going to go here because that's the first drive they get to. Slagle: And so I raise just this thought for consideration and that is if it was a light you wouldn't hear the question raised because to me that gives all directions 30 seconds to go through. To think that at the peak times that people are going to want to try and shoot across 41 with no police officers stopping traffic, you know for again those small amount of times albeit a few hours on a Sunday I think is really asking for a potential situation, so I'm going to throw out, it's a question but it's also a comment. That maybe we consider having public safety and I'll ask staff to look into it, for some time. You know in other words, let's try this for 2 months. See what happens. Get people's feedback and if they don't think we need it, great. But I would hate to think that we're going to start without elevating it to the safest level and then work our way down. Dan Russ: I think it's the church's position that we would definitely want to control safety. If there was an issue there, we would not hesitate to have... Slagle: I understand. Dan Russ: The last think we want is an accident there with injuries of any kind, whether it's our church people or neighbors or anyone else moving on that road system. Keefe: And believe it or not, I think at least when I drove by there on a Sunday morning, I think the traffic volume was heavy enough, and I don't know for sure but it didn't, they were waiting to get in this new entrance. Then they stack all the way back to 41 to 5. There may be that many cars coming up that way. I just don't know for sure. 15 Planning Commission Sting —June 15, 2004 • Dan Russ: I don't know. I mean our traffic people have told us that that's not the case. Slagle: See this dovetails on the question earlier about the traffic study that we don't have in front of us, and I understand that it's just not here. And I'm not suggesting this is premature without that, but boy I'm hoping staff, you're going to shake your heads yes that we'll just do everything we can to make sure these are safe and work our way down. Dan Russ: Now MnDot looked at the intersection and they didn't, they didn't warrant a traffic study, is that right? Saam: Correct. Yeah, they took traffic counts out there and. Dan Russ: They waived it, so I'm not sure what they were looking at or when. They were looking at the roadways but. Sacchet: Traffic study's expected to be in place before it goes to council. Saam: Correct. Yeah. Sacchet: Because that's very important. Okay. Any more questions of the applicant? I've got a few questions too. In terms of the wetland mitigation, you guys are fine with what the situation is? This is kind of a bummer that it wasn't declared when you had some credits and now you're being told that you can't draw on them because you didn't declare them. When I read that I thought whoa. Dan Russ: It's difficult but it is what it is and we're going to have to abide by it and we appreciate the city's. Sacchet: You just make the thing a little bigger. There's plenty of room and all? Dan Russ: Well, we have land. We're losing more land than we anticipated which will impact the church's ability to expand on that parcel. But we are where we are and we'll have to do what... Sacchet: Do you know where you're going to expand? Like you make what part you're expanding out a little bit further to the west or something like that? Dan Russ: Well the expansion as we anticipate our next phase would be our multi purpose building what we'll call it. Sacchet: I mean the wetland expansion. Dan Russ: Oh, the wetland expansion. Yeah, we're okay with what's happening there... It expanded into usable ground. 16 Planning Commission ting — June 15, 2004 • Sacchet: Just go around the edge a little further, is that the idea? Dan Russ: Right. Just have to make it bigger. Sacchet: Alright. And with the trees, there are not any significant trees that are coming out because of the road or do you know? Dan Russ: Well people have different opinions of trees and quality of trees. To me they're in the lower wetland type trees. They're not as permanent, beautiful hardwoods that we have along the corridor, along here and the church's position has always been preservation of anything that we can and we've done our best to mitigate removal of trees but there are some trees down there in that lower wetland area. Those beautiful cottonwood that snow in July. There's some of those that down there that we're going to lose but we'll get over that. Sacchet: And you understand, you found a balance about the temporary road with making it bituminous curb and gutter. Dan Russ: Yes Sacchet: That's not an issue anymore. I think that's all my questions. Dan Russ: And we're working with the city on the cost associated with it and I think we're finding a nice balance there. We have met with the Carlson and the Brandt people to the west of us. Bruce is here and he has involvement in our development is instrumental. We're trying to facilitate him for future use of utilities, water and sewer through the water and sewer that we have connected to the property. And the roadway I think meets with his standards and what he wants and it will line up with his piece right SO. Sacchet: Is there water and sewer going through that roadway? Saam: Not at this time but that is a possibility as the church and Mr. Carlson continue to talk. Sacchet: That it will go through that land. Saam: Possibly. And it would come down the whole length, it'd probably come down from the middle of the site. Maybe in the temporary road, something like that. Dan Russ: We've got sewer service to our facility that will accommodate our three buildings but we've got a system in which we can increase the capacity and as good stewards of the community we'd let him hook onto our system if you will, which then hooks on up in Tanadoona to service his future development so we're in agreement with that. 17 Planning Commission Sting — June 15, 2004 is Sacchet: Excellent. Thank you very much. Dan Russ: You're welcome. Now this is a public hearing. Or are there more applicant comments? I don't know, you had several applicant people right? Sacchet: Alright. This is a public hearing so anybody wants to come forward and comment to this application, this project, this is your turn. Seeing nobody, yes. Please come forward if you want to say something. State your name and address for the record and let us hear what you have to say please. Maren Christopher: My name is Maren Christopher and I live on 7311 Dogwood Road. And so my concern is hearing that West 78d could possibly connect to Dogwood, and I don't know if this is a premature concern because they're talking about a temporary roadway now. We aren't talking about extending it but I did hear that tonight. And I heard extending to Crimson Bay Road, which then I'm assuming Crimson Bay would connect to Dogwood and have the 78 Street connection. So I wanted to voice my concerns. I'm wondering where to go with this. Sacchet: Well actually, I don't know whether all of us were here when this came before and we heard very pronounced opposition from the residents to anything connecting in that area. On the other hand it's my understanding that the comprehensive plan has envisioned there being a connection all along, so we have kind of a clash of two visions here. So is it premature? Well, in one hand it's probably too late you could say because the comprehensive plan was done what, 10, 15 years ago when that was envisioned. On the other hand, it isn't there and it seems like the residents don't want it. I don't know, any comments from engineering viewpoint on that Matt please. Saam: Sure. I guess before anything like that would happen, there'd be a public process just for that. Again while this may set in motion something that could ultimately connect them, this isn't connecting them. So again that would be a separate project and public hearings and everything on it at some time in the future so I guess that's what I would offer up. Just like any, the Carlson development, if that were to go. There'd be, he'd come in. We'd see the sewer and water plans at that time so they are separate but aligned. Maren Christopher: At that time are you considering sewer and water for Dogwood? Saam: We would, I mean we'd love to see that yeah because of the septic issues out there but again at this time that's not on the table as of yet. Maren Christopher: Okay, so just wait? Saam: Yeah. In Planning Commission Sting — June 15, 2004 • Slagle: If I can comment, just as a citizen. I wouldn't just wait. Get involved. You know certainly contact some of your neighbors and voice your thoughts to whether it'd be staff. Maren Christopher: I would say we're probably mostly all in agreement. I don't know, there's only 2 of us here and Peter is involved in, he's one of the developers of this property. So I don't know if he has a conflict of interest. And I don't know why none of our other neighbors are here. Usually we all turn out en masse so I'm just amazed. Sacchet: Well this is not an aspect that's really connected, as was pointed out. I mean we're not looking at connecting at this point. Does it make a connection that brings it a little close? Yes, it's halfway there but. Maren Christopher: I know. It's getting closer and I don't want to not speak out. Slagle: Stay involved. Sacchet: Alright, well I appreciate, and it's important that you express that because we all work together. Thank you. Appreciate it. Any other comments? If not, I will close the public hearing. Bring it back to commissioners for comments and discussion. Who wants to start? Should we do the ladies first? Tjomhom: You know I don't have a comment to lead. Lillehaug: I'll start it if I can. Sacchet: Go ahead Steve. Lillehaug: I guess I just want to get this out there. Commissioner Slagle said he didn't want to throw out there that this is premature but I think it is. I have so many notes here. Unanswered questions so I'm just going to start big picture items. I think this is being built because of the inadequacies of Tanadoona. That's my first comment. It's definitely important to have another connector though with that parking lot for safety. I definitely agree with that. But do we put this road in now and build a full intersection? I mean we don't have a traffic study done. I think we hugely have the cart before the horse here. I think my opinion is I would rather see this road temporary all the way out to Trunk Highway 41 right now. The only purpose of this road right now is to serve the parking lot and possibly help preserve right-of-way in the future for a local road to connect up with the west. I think it's premature. We were sitting up here trying to analyze the traffic and MnDot doesn't have traffic numbers. City doesn't have traffic numbers. We don't have any traffic numbers for this intersection and the geometrics are being set right in front of us ah-eady. That's not, in my mind that's not how you build this intersection. For that one reason it's premature. Where else do I go? And I hate talking negative about this. I mean the developer's doing everything possible he can so somehow I want to help this out but I don't think a permanent intersection in the roadway is the answer right now. MnDot has reviewed this but they're not concerned with costs for the future. 19 Planning Commission ruing — June 15, 2004 • They know the city is going to bury these costs when we go into this intersection again and remove, add median, whatever we have to do there when this road connects up to the west. They're not looking at the cost of what it will take the city to retrofit this intersection again. I mean we just looked at it 2 years ago, whatever it was when we put, when that intersection was made. We put a median in there. Now we're taking it out. We're going to go back and forth here because we don't know what's going on to the west yet and I think I could point out other areas in the city where we tried doing the same thing, up Powers and over there in the Kerber development where this little area was reserved right-of-way and 20 years later we had problems with it and we just dealt with that. This probably wouldn't be that extensive of a case that we would have to deal with but you know, cart before the horse. We saw that first hand. What else here? I have to put my page back. The traffic study. It should just simply be done before we're at this level here. I don't support moving forward without that. Removing that existing median, no way. And then I want to. Slagle: If I can just ask a question. Sorry to interrupt but to you and because of your position outside of this commission, and then also direct to staff. I mean is there a reason this wasn't done? Saam: You mean the traffic study? Slagle: Yeah. Saam: Logistically we need the layouts before the traffic engineer can review it. And then it's just the timing issue. And this was the first time and we were doing the new, doing it the new way I'll call it where the city is getting in escrow from the, I mean all that takes time to get the proposal. To get a consultant on board and get him going and so I guess we as staff didn't want to hold up the developer at this point when they submit because of that. When they're willing to fund it and get everything for us. Work with us on the public street and everything like that so. Sacchet: Is that all Steve? Lillehaug: Sure, I'll try to shorten this up. Again I disagree with removing the median. The median exists on this frontage road almost at every single intersection as it exists right now except for Powers on the west side. You know if you look at this intersection, the proper course of travel isn't immediately obvious without the help of channelization by these medians. It's not easy to follow. I think continuity is in question when you go, when you flow around that intersection and all the different taming movements due to the approach alignments of 78th. 78th Street, there's a slight skew. There is non -symmetry of that intersection and if you look at the radii coming up to that intersection, you know they're not two tangent sections coming up to that intersection. And it will be a fairly wide intersection and a safer design would be one with a median. Obviously if there's a median there right now. 20 Planning Commission ting — June 15, 2004 • Sacchet: If I can jump in. Matt, there's no room for a median or I mean I understand it needs to be lined up with the road on the other side so we have to take out the median because it's aiming the wrong way but isn't there room to add a median back in? Saam: I don't think that's the issue. I think we could put one in there if there was a need for it. Sacchet: From your analysis there isn't a need? Saam: ...traffic numbers, there's some things that MnDot did take traffic counts at the intersection. Sacchet: So we're not totally without. Saam: ...20 year ADT's for the intersection that was requested by Commissioner Lillehaug. We have taken traffic counts at the existing intersection within the last 2 months so they know that the traffic that's going in there. They're not just saying oh, we don't need a signal. It's based on data. We're also having the traffic study reviewed to make sure A, do we not need a signal there? Is this going to work out? Everything like that so if the study comes back by the time of council and says you know, it would be a good idea to have a median, we'll put it in. I don't think it's. Sacchet: So based on the information we have right now, it's not required. Saam: Exactly. Based on the people that we've had look at it, MnDot's traffic engineers, and they do have jurisdiction over this road right now. Even though West 78`" Street will be turned back to the city, they have jurisdiction over it right now. Sacchet: Okay. Steve, I didn't mean to interrupt. Lillehaug: No, that's fine. I guess we do have traffic numbers for it now. I don't know. Sacchet: We don't have the study yet. Lillehaug: No. I think a median's important for proper channelization and that's the bottom line. I don't think we should be taking a step backwards on this brand new road. You know no matter who's paying the bill. Even if it's part of my portion, I'm willing to pay it. It's going to be a busier intersection. I see a flavor of this as a continuation of the frontage road out to Trunk Highway 5 and connecting up with this. The frontage road's not going to stop at 41. It's going to continue out in my mind and we need to do it right now. Again, I don't want to seem shoe homed in here. If you go up and down that frontage road, I mean I can already see some of it's ripped up already, and it's 2 years old you know. Let me go on here. Sorry here. Sacchet: That's abight. Take your time. 21 Planning Commission leting — June 15, 2004 0 Lillehaug: The turn lanes on 41. We shouldn't deviate from the minimum required turn lane lengths that MnDot requires regardless if we don't think that traffic major route is going to be to the south and taking a right. It's a standard 300 foot left turn lane and that should be strictly adhered to. You've got 50 miles an hour out on 41 and that should be strictly enforced. Well, if this does go through I think we need a fence on top of that wall. There's a wall further down on the frontage road in front of. Sacchet: Retaining wall you're talking about? Lillehaug: Retaining wall. What did I say? But right to the east of Kwik Trip, it's a significant right on that retaining wall and there is a fence on top of that retaining wall. Sacchet: Are you saying a guard rail or a fence? Lillehaug: A fence. Sacchet: Because it's next to the roadway. You could say it needs a guardrail, not a fence. Lillehaug: Which way does this wall go? Sacchet: The wall is on the south side. Lillehaug: Okay, I'm thinking of, I didn't look at that intersection out there in the field. I looked at the plans so the grades are going down. Dan Russ: The ground is higher than the roadway. Lillehaug: Guardrail, there we go. Definitely a guardrail. Thank you. What else here? You look at the frontage road again to the east. We've got trees up and down that frontage road. We have, I realize there's existing trees out there but I think we should have trees along that frontage road out there to continue the look of the frontage road. It's a continuation of it. Again, a few trees on the north there. They're showing 3. I think there's some existing out there but I think it's important that we maintain the standards of screening and berming on the north of that parking lot from Tanadoona and I don't see why we would deviate here. Sacchet: Are we deviating? Lillehaug: Deviating from the standards as far as berming. Enough screening to screen the parking from Tanadoona. I think we're deviating from the standards... Sacchet: Is it possible to berm? I mean what are the grades? Lillehaug: There's 65 feet there. There's plenty of room, in my mind. 22 Planning Commission ting—June 15, 2004 • Keefe: ...for trees or vegetation. I mean there's grass out there. Sacchet: So there's room for planting and possibly berming. Is there room? Dan Russ: Well there certainly room to grade on Tanadoona and then ... so half the parking lot, the berm is material. The other half it would be ... I would think you would want a lower landscape berm... Sacchet: Landscape berm. Dan Russ: Pine trees versus dirt that doesn't do much. Sacchet: Got it. Lillehaug: So in summary I think this should be a temporary driveway connection all the way out to Trunk Highway 41 at this time. That's what I support. Sacchet: Okay. Thanks for your comments Steve. Any other comments? Discussion? Slagle: I've got a few. Sacchet: Go ahead Rich. Slagle: If I can ask another question of staff. Comment on Commissioner Lillehaug's last comment about the temporary call it street connecting to a temporary driveway. Why wouldn't we do that? Saam: In our mind now is the time to build it so we're going to have the developer go in there. The church put in curb and gutter, 26 feet wide and we're talking about what we're doing on the east side with ripping stuff out after a couple years. Now we're going to come back within probably 3 to 4 years and tear it out. Or at least along the edges and widen it. I mean to us at least it's a good point that Commissioner Sacchet made. Build it up to where they're proposing their driveway and then we end it, and then when Carlson or whoever comes in in the future, then put the public street on. I think that's a great point but I just think we're missing an opportunity. It's a good use of funds now to do it. We don't have to do it as a public project. The church is willing to take on the lead. And then we just work out a payment agreement. There's some cost savings there. You don't have to go through public bidding, that sort of thing so we just think right now is a good time to do it with the driveway coming in. Sacchet: In terms of safety, I mean is there a difference between the public or the temporary road? Saam: In terms of safety. Well if you talk about the intersection, as I said we're going to make sure that is safe whether it's private or public, and I believe the same improvements would have to be made. In terms of sight distance and that sort of thing. Lining up the 23 Planning Commission feting — June 15, 2004 • intersections. Whether we need the median or not. That will all have to be done now. Along the cost savings lines, just let me add, there's things like ponding. Setting up storm sewer. Wetland filling. The grading. I just think it makes total sense to do this now with the private, with the driveway going in. Let's just make it a little wider. Get it done now. Build it up to their entrance and end it. Slagle: Okay. My comments are as follows. I think I support the project with some conditions added. And I won't add those now. They'll be part of a motion but they center around the median, sidewalk, and the sidewalk would be the crossing of 41 and then the sidewalk issues in the parking lot. In response to Commissioner Lillehaug's concern of premature, I'm almost there Steve but I'm just short of agreeing so that's where I stand right now. Sacchet: Okay. Bethany. Still no comments? Tjomhom: You're going to make me comment. You know I understand the need for an expansion of the parking lot for safety. I understand having a state patrolman out in the dark directing traffic in the rain and the snow and the hazards that that can cause. I too would like to not take away any of the tum lanes, having deviations from the turn lanes on 41. And as far as a traffic study goes, in my mind we do a traffic study now for this section. If you expand for another building, do we do another traffic study for that then? Saam: We're having the traffic study take into account their ultimate development, along with possible ultimate Crimson Bay and Dogwood lots accessing off this road so. Tjomhom: So then they won't have to go back for, and wait for another traffic study. Saam: Hopefully not. Tjomhom: Okay. Now was there a traffic study done in the beginning? Saam: Yes. Tjomhom: And did that traffic study, was it adequate for what we're talking about now? Saam: No, not what we're talking about now. It didn't look at the exact configuration of the future, of these intersection improvements. Of the secondary access. It just basically stated that with additional expansion due to traffic, the Tanadoona intersection isn't going to work on it's own and that second one will have to be added. Tjomhom: That's too bad because we wouldn't probably be having this discussion had the fust traffic study been adequate I guess. But I too generally support the project. You have to take the good with the bad and unfortunately, or I mean fortunately or unfortunately I think we have to take the parking lots. iLI Planning Commission Ming — June 15, 2004 0 Keefe: I've got a couple comments. Give me a sense on the cost savings. We're going to, the city will be picking up what? The additional 5 feet, is that what my understanding is? Saam: Correct. Keefe: And then the cost of the intersection as well. Saam: No. No, the intersection as previously stated would be required. Those improvements, whether it's private or public so that's why we're reasoning that that portion needs to be paid by the church. So we have done the street costs, some minor pond increasing for the additional street width. The storm water that's generated by the additional widening of the street. That sort of thing. There's additional grading costs. Those type of things. Keefe: You know it seems like this is, at least right now obviously the benefit of the church and public safetz, if indeed traffic will be split somewhat between the Tanadoona Drive and the West 78 Street. You know it's for a couple of hours on a Sunday. Boy, you know so the city's going to be picking up some costs associated with really what's going to benefit probably mostly the church and then people are going to be, there's going to be some people who are going to be driving down 41 at that particular time who hopefully it will be a safer situation because it's not stacking up as much on Tanadoona. Saam: Yeah, I see where you're going but keep in mind, I mean we as a city staff and planners, I'll include myself in that group, we all the time put in trunk or area wide type improvements that maybe aren't utilized to their maximum the minute they go in, but within 5 years they need to be there to further development along and I think that's what we're doing here. We're setting ourselves up. It's in the comp plan... Keefe: Let me ask a second piece to it. What is the timing on the future church development? Do we have any plan in regards to that? Saam: I think Mr. Russ just said to me, within 6 months they're going to be adding another building. They'll be doing more. I mean they have an ultimate plan that was looked at when this originally came in for what, 2-3 more buildings. More parking lots. A chapel out in the, so. You know multi phased development. At least probably 2-3 more improvement expansions. Keefe: 2 or 3 more over what? Any guess on timeframe? I mean you know, just what drive it is. Yeah okay, it's availability of funds. Okay. Dan Russ: ...if we had the funds today, we'd be in tomorrow and wanting to build a 4,500 seat sanctuary you know. Multi-purpose room, gathering room. Potentially a 300- 400 seat small chapel in the woods... 25 Planning Commission Isting — June 15, 2004 • Audience member: I think the other thing to consider is the developments to the west of here. We're considering that more in the short term, in the next year or two versus a longer term so. You know again, we can bring something in now but on a temporary basis it's going to be really temporary for all the purposes that we're talking about. Keefe: It's probably outside of the scope of this meeting but what is the timing? 2 years? Audience member: Oh, as soon as we possibly can. We've got to get to agreement with the church on sewer connections and water. Sacchet: And you came in before, as I remember, to look at some of that stuff so they've been here for a work session once to look at that stuff so it's not something new. Keefe: Right, okay. The other thing I guess my other comment, what I would like to see more landscaping on the north end on Tanadoona. I don't know, I would agree with Dan's comment that I think that at least driving by, I think if you were to berm it, I don't know that you'd get a lot of benefit from that but I definitely think it would increase in the vegetation would help some on that particular piece. Sacchet: Thanks Dan. Steve, you want to add something? Lillehaug: Yeah, just a little more. I don't think I'd be having such a big problem with this if the traffic study was done before everything was laid out. Traffic studies can be twisted once things are laid out and I know they get twisted, regardless if it's an independent consultant firm, developer driven, staff driven. That should have been done before now in my mind, and that's the big problem because simple questions, I mean the intersection is laid out and we don't have a clue and staff has indicated this to us. I mean I specifically asked, do we have any existing numbers or proposed numbers and they said there was none there. So how can you design an intersection without any traffic volumes, so that is my biggest problem right now is I can't support this without, what are we approving? We're approving the unknown right here and that's the bottom line. Off site from the developer so I'm done. Sacchet: Alright. Is it my turn? My turn I guess. Well I wish traffic studies would have ... but unfortunately from our experience here, they're most the time more fluff than substance I hate to say it but, in an ideal case it would have been nice to have it here but we don't have it so we have to live with that. Is it premature because of that? Or is it premature to make a public mad? I mean the worst that can happen is that it's going to need a light at that intersection. I mean if that intersection's not going to function well, there's a very simple solution then. It's going to have to be signalized. I don't personally think that the lack of the traffic study is a reason to hold this up. Yes, it would be highly preferable and desirable to have it in front of us. I think it's mandatory that that will be in place for council, and that's already being assured that it will be in place for that. But I would be prepared to let this go to council with making that point very, very clear and adding some of the other concerns and addressing them like one of them is definitely the median. And I do agree with you Steve on that. The fact that currently we have a median `TI Planning Commission Sting — June 15, 2004 • and we rip it out and we settle for something less. It doesn't sound quite right for me. Yes, it's an additional cost that is not attractive from that angle. But why should we go backward? Especially with an intersection that has some complexity to it with the turning movements and everything, in terms of safety. Does it absolutely need one? We're not the specialists on this but from what I'm seeing here, I think it would be a good thing to have. Whether we want to make it a firm condition or not, I don't know. I could go either way on that. It's certainly something that we would want to have looked at very carefully further. Especially before it goes to council. The concern about this becoming a frontage road, and we have at least one neighbor here that spoke up about that. I mean we had very vehement comments last time anything in this context came up that these people, they love their narrow, little road there, Dogwood. The reality is probably that there will be some changes. I mean it's going to be developed, that property west of the church. It's going to have to be accessed and I wonder where it ultimately is going to be. I would expect it's actually going to be to the benefit of that neighborhood to have another access. And it's not going to become a through road. Even if it connects to Crimson Bay, which it may never but I mean that goes through so many turns getting out onto 5, I would not consider that a frontage road in the sense of frontage road. I really would think it's going to remain an access road for the residents. Maybe with the addition that the church goers are going to start going that way west rather than come out on 41, but that's speculation. We don't need to delay for that excessively at this point. Should the road follow the standards? I would very much recommend that, but that's out of our hands. I mean that's a MnDot question and if they're willing to negotiate, they're willing to negotiate. That's not in our scope but only I think it's important that those standards be adhered to. Should it be a temporary road all the way to 41? I really disagree. Very fundamentally disagree. I think this is the time to make this a public road. This is the time to make this the full width. It goes across a wetland. There is this grading involved and there's a lot involved. Be silly to make it more narrow and then have to add it on. That does not compute and make it too where the driveway is because we don't need to go further at this point and there's no need for the city to bear the cost to go further to go nowhere. Do we need a guardrail above that retaining wall? I think that's mandatory. I think we have an agreement on that. The trees. I'm kind of a tree guy here on this little group, and it kind of irks me that there was no quantification of the trees that are being cut so if maybe that can be looked at a little bit before it goes to council, I think that would make sense. To make sure there is a decent buffer of the parking lot to the north to where it's going to do, and I think that's a very reasonable requirement to put in there in terms of integrating this as well as possible into the existing neighborhood. Sidewalks I think are very important. And I think that it was very well received by the developer to have something that goes across the islands. Kind of up in ... and at the same time adding a sidewalk all the way to the end of the parking lot so that people in a safe way can easily get to church, the service. They can push their strollers, what have you. Made sense and it looks like it received like that. The other aspect of traffic is the crossing of 41. I don't know what to do about that. I mean can we make, do we do striping so pedestrians go across? I mean is there a solution? 27 Planning Commission Kting — June 15, 2004 • Saam: Yes. I mean striping, signage, maybe even a push button thing. I doubt we'd get that but. Sacchet: Well once we get a light but we have no light at this point. Saam: Yeah. That's about all we can hope for at this point. Striping and signage. As Commissioner Slagle mentioned, as we have on Powers. Sacchet: Well, that's all my comments. Sorry for being a little lengthy. And I would like to have a motion, if somebody would want to venture a motion. Slagle: I'll make a motion. Sacchet: Go ahead Rich. Slagle: Hold on one second. Sacchet: You know, while you're still scribbling. I'm actually glad this came through. I mean it's an important comment to make. When this came in front of us at first, at least some of us up here actually spoke up and said how's this going to work with just the Tanadoona access, and everyone was talking about how this is going to be improved and it's going to be at a 90 degree angle and it is going to be all these wonderful things, but I haven't driven past it too many times when there was traffic but it's a real issue. I think it really, really needs that second access. It needs it where there's a major intersection type thing and I really welcome and want to commend you for bringing this in. Maybe a little before it absolutely is necessary. Totally necessary. I think it's necessary now and it's a good thing to do so I want to commend you for doing that. Are you ready Rich? Slagle: I'm jotting down some conditions but I'm sure there will be a few more. I recommend that the Planning Commission approve Planning Case number 04-20 Site Plan Review for a 143 space parking lot expansion, extension of temporary drive and extension of West 78i° Street, , plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated May 14, 2004, subject to the following conditions. And I will right now we're at 34. And I'm going to add a few and, well actually do I add them now? I do don't I? Sacchet: Yes, you can add them with your motion. Slagle: My number 35 is a guardrail to be placed on top of the retaining wall on the southern end of the property. Number 36. The raised median on the east side of 41, placed on West 78'h currently to be removed and a new one placed in correct alignment with the extension westward of West 780'. 37 would be a sidewalk to be extended along the main driveway from the main entrance of the church on the east side of the main driveway and I'll ask staff to help with the verbiage. But basically running to the northern end of the driveway where the new parking lot ends. And then there would be two diagonal walkways similar to the northwest parking lot, on that northern, across the alleys or island if you will. And that's what I have so far so if anybody wants. 0 Planning Commission Wing — June 15, 2004 • Sacchet: We have a motion. Is there a second? Lillehaug: Point of clarification. This, I think what the applicant told me is wrong. The road is lower than the boulevard in this area. Sacchet: That's what they're saying, yes. Lillehaug: Then we don't need a guardrail. Slagle: Yeah, then we don't need a guardrail. Lillehaug: You don't need a guardrail. You need a fence above the retaining wall. Dan Russ: Correct. Correct. Sacchet: Now you confused me. We have the road and then the drop? Slagle: No. Sacchet: Oh, you have the road and then go up? Dan Russ: Yes. Sacchet: So then you don't need a guardrail. Slagle: No. Okay, no guardrail. Fence. Sacchet: Fence on top of the. Lillehaug: Fence on top of the wall. Keefe: If you have a retaining wall, why do you need a fence? Lillehaug: You don't want anyone... Maybe the Arboretum has a chain link fence out there already. Can staff comment on that? Saam: They do have a fence. Sacchet: If there's not people out there, they don't need a fence. Lillehaug: Right. So if there's no people up there, the Arboretum already has a fence, then we're probably okay with it I guess. Slagle: Okay, I'll take it off. 29 Planning Commission Oeting — June 15, 2004 • Sacchet: Good point. Thanks for clarifying that. I thought it was dropping, not raising. Slagle: Then number 35 is off, okay. Sacchet: Alright. We have a motion. Is there a second? Tjornhom: Second. Sacchet: We have a second. Are there friendly amendments? More. Saam: Mr. Chair? Sacchet: Yes. Saam: Did you add, just saw on my notes, buffering along Tanadoona. Did I hear that? Sacchet. Not yet. Do you want to add that? Keefe: Yeah, I would like to add. Sacchet: So that would be, since we skipped 35. Slagle: So it would be 37. Sacchet: 37 would be the berming, or the buffering. Landscape buffer. Slagle: Additional landscaping on northern side. Sacchet: On the north side towards Tanadoona. That's this one, okay. We did the median. We can't really require anything to cross 41. That's beyond this project, is it? Slagle: No, we can request. Saam: With the intersection improvements you can. Sacchet: Yeah, because I think we should do something. If we can only do striping, let's do striping. Did I actually mention that? Slagle: Require striping and signage, is that okay Matt? Saam: Yes. Sacchet: Striping, yeah it needs signs otherwise it's useless. Saam: For crosswalk. 30 Planning Commission Sting —June 15, 2004 • Sacchet: For crosswalk, yes. That's important. So that would be 38. Keefe: How about entrance signage? I notice on the plan they've got, are planning on putting in an entrance sign. Do we require anything to be consistent with their other one? Or to be consistent with, is there anything we would amend or do we kind of just let them. Do they have to come back for approval on that anyway? Sacchet: Well signage needs a permit. So they have to come back with their sign so we can let that be at this point. Did we discuss temporary road? Well the conditions require the public road all the way to where the temporary road, driveway comes in. How about, I remember we had some situation in the past where we made a stipulation that should a light be required, a signalized intersection, that there would be some sharing of costs or something to that effect. I don't know how we worded it in the past. I don't know whether we need to go as far as having an escrow or how we would handle that. Saam: Yeah, we've gotten letter of credit or financial security. I think we mentioned financial security will be required to guarantee installation of public improvements. I might offer up that when we get the traffic study by the time of council, if we find we do need a signal at that time we could require it. Sacchet: I think it was Lake Street. Somewhere in the Village of the Ponds we had a situation where we put something in like at Lake Drive, yeah. Saam: Pulte too across the street. We had them escrow funds but again there we had a development contract and everything and at that time we did believe there was going to need to be a signal there. This is before West 78`s Street. Sacchet: So we don't need to make that condition, but we can make it comments for council to consider. Keefe: Do we put an amendment in on, for a condition in regards to the traffic study. Do we need to add something along... Sacchet: The traffic, we can make that a comment too. That the traffic study needs to be ready to do to council, and then the same with the light. We can make that comments rather than conditions because it's not something that's probably going to be conditional yet. Okay? Slagle: I don't think I can offer conditions at this point. Right? Is that correct? Sacchet: Yes you can. You can amend. Slagle: If I made the motion? Sacchet: You can friendly amend yourself. 31 Planning Commission ting — June 15, 2004 • Slagle: Okay, friendly amend myself. Sacchet: But you also have to accept them. Slagle: Yeah. That'd be interesting if you offer one and don't accept it. But I want to have something about the public safety officer. And again I'm thinking for some time frame, and again I'd leave that up to the applicant and staff to work out but I don't think we can just start and then see what happens, and I know the applicant is, so I'm going to put condition number 39. Require public safety officer to continue working both Tanadoona and West 78th for 8 weeks. 4 weeks? Sacchet: I wouldn't quantify it Rich. Slagle: Okay. Sacchet: I would trust the operation, but that to state that they have to continue. I think that's fair. Slagle: Continue, okay. Keefe: Just continue for a period of time until they deem it's not necessary. Sacchet: I mean if that's a concern of your's... Slagle: It is. It is. Dan Russ: I would just kind of restate it that public safety. They're the ones that are on top of what needs to happen. We don't know if it's safe or not. We need public safety to tell us, we don't need somebody here or we need somebody here at this time and that time. Slagle: Does that go through you Matt? Sawn: I can sure coordinate it. We can work with them because we do the traffic counts and what not so I would. Slagle: Okay, so require public safety officer to continue working intersections as directed by public safety. Okay. Perfect. Because there was no reference to it in here. Sacchet: Okay. Did you accept that amendment? Slagle: I accept that. Sacchet: Ahight. We have a motion. We have a second. We have friendly amendments. 01A Planning Commission ating — June 15, 2004 • Slagle moved, Tjornhom seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 04-20 Site Plan Review for a 143 -space X arking lot expansion, extension of temporary drive and extension of West 78 Street, plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated May 14, 2004, subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around all existing landscaping at the edge of grading limits. 3. Any existing landscaping that is removed must be replaced when the parking lot construction is completed. 4. The landscape islands shall be filled with wood chips. 5. Overstory trees are required along West 78th St.; one every 30 feet. 6. Three accessible parking spaces must be added to the existing accessible parking area. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). The applicant shall receive the City's approval of a wetland replacement plan prior to any wetland impact occurring. 8. A wetland buffer 0 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 10 feet) shall be maintained around all existing and proposed wetlands (wetland buffers proposed for PVC must maintain a width of 16.5 feet). Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and will pay the City $20 per sign. 9. All structures shall maintain a 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 10. The proposed development shall maintain existing runoff rates. Storm water calculations shall be submitted to staff to ensure runoff rates will not increase as a result of the proposed development. The applicant may work with the Arboretum to ensure their concerns are addressed. 11. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used for mitigation credit and storm water ponds. 12. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: 33 Planning Commission ating — June 15, 2004 • Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area Steeper than 3:1 7 days is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 13. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 14. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, e.g. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering) and Army Corps of Engineers and comply with their conditions of approval. 15. All final plans must be signed by a registered civil engineer. 16. Use the latest version (2004) of the City's Standard Detail Plates. 17. The twin storm sewer culverts under West 78th Street must be RCP Class S. 18. The existing driveway from Highway 41 to the existing homes in the northwest corner of the West 78th Street intersection must be removed and seeded or sodded. 19. Include concrete driveway aprons and pedestrian ramps for both proposed driveways off of new West 78th Street. 20. The new painted median for the eastbound West 78th Street traffic on the east side of Highway 41 must be a raised concrete median with pedestrian ramps. 21. Install a temporary turnaround with barricades and a sign stating "This street to be extended" at the west end of new West 78th Street. 22. Provide a pedestrian ramp at the northeast comer of the new West 78th Streetf ighway 41 intersection for connection to the future city trail. 23. Incorporate the conditions of the MnDOT review letter dated June 1, 2004 into the plans. 34 Planning Commission feting — June 15, 2004 • 24. Show all of the proposed grades for the new driveway to the existing home in the southeast corner of the site. 25. A permit for the proposed retaining wall is required to be obtained from the Building Department and the wall must be designed by a registered structural engineer. 26. Off-site grading will require a temporary easement or right -of -entry agreement from the Arboretum. 27. Should earthwork quantities not balance on site and materials need to be imported or exported from the site, the developer will need to supply the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval by staff. In addition, if material is proposed to be exported to another location in Chanhassen, it should be noted that the properties would be required to obtain an earthwork permit from the City. 28. All areas disturbed as a result of construction -related activity must be sodded and/or seeded and disc mulched within two weeks of disturbance. 29. A MnDOT drainage permit will be required. In addition, an NPDES permit and Watershed district permit will be required for the project grading. 30. Drainage and utility easements will be required over the wetland, pond, and the adjacent mitigation areas. An easement for access purposes will also be required for future maintenance of the wetlands. 31. Erosion control measures and site restoration must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Staff recommends that the City's Type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to all existing wetlands and ponds. In addition, erosion control blankets should be used on all slopes 3:1 or greater with heights of 6' or more. 32. A financial security will be required to guarantee installation of the public improvements. 33. Bituminous curb and gutter must be added to the temporary driveway. 34. Prior to any future building expansion to the west side of the existing church building, the temporary access driveway from West 78th Street must be brought up to current standards in effect at the time." 35. The raised median on the east side of 41, placed on West 78`s currently to be removed and a new one placed in correct alignment with the extension westward of West 78`s. RR Planning Commission Oting — June 15, 2004 • 36. A sidewalk be extended along the main driveway from the main entrance of the church on the east side to the northern end of the driveway where the new parking lot ends and two diagonal walkways similar to the northwest parking lot. 37. Additional landscaping along the north side on Tanadoona Drive. 38. Require public safety officer to continue working the two intersections as directed by public safety. All voted in favor, except Lillehaug who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of4to1. Sacchet: Steve, do you want to add, we already heard why you're opposing. Do you want to add summary wise in the vote? Lillehaug: Sure, and the council people want to see a summary because they don't, they requested that so in a quick summary. I think this is premature without the traffic study being completed. I don't think we should deviate backwards from not re -installing concrete median. Slagle: We are going to do that. Sacchet: We asked that to happen. Lillehaug: Good. I must have been asleep. Sacchet: We did listen to you some. Lillehaug: Well then I'm happy. No, no, no. I still feel it's premature. Sacchet: So that would not have changed your vote? Lillehaug: No. Sacchet: And you made that very clear in your comments so. Lillehaug: Even with median we need a traffic study. We just need it. Sacchet: Okay. Well let me summarize for council a little bit and you guys help me out. We all, I believe in some degrees welcome this secondary access. Slagle: Want to do this one first? Sacchet: Oh no, we do, well yeah. Let's do the second motion. 01 Planning Commission Atting —June 15, 2004 • Slagle: I would make a motion that we approve planning case 04-20 Wetland Alteration Permit to alter and fill wetlands on site, plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated May 14, 2004 subject to the following conditions, 1 through 9. Sacchet: We have a motion. Is there a second? Keefe: Second. Sacchet: Any comments? Additions? Friendly amendments? No? Slagle moved, Keefe seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 04-20 Wetland Alteration Permit to alter and fill wetlands on site, plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering, dated May 14, 2004, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall develop an amendment to the wetland replacement plan to achieve the required 2:1 replacement without employing credits constructed during the first phase. 2. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). The applicant shall receive the City's approval of a wetland replacement plan prior to any wetland impact occurring. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. A wetland buffer 0 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 10 feet) shall be maintained around all existing and proposed wetlands. (Wetland buffers proposed for PVC must maintain a width of 16.5 feet.) Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and will pay the City $20 per sign. 4. All structures shall maintain a 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. The proposed development shall maintain existing runoff rates. Storm water calculations shall be submitted to staff to ensure runoff rates will not increase as a result of the proposed development. The applicant may work with the Arboretum to ensure their concerns are addressed. 6. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used for mitigation credit and storm water ponds. 7. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: 37 Planning Commission Sting —June 15, 2004 • Tempe of Slone Time (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area Steeper than 3:1 7 days is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 8. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 9. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, e.g. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering) and Army Corps of Engineers and comply with their conditions of approval." All voted in favor, except Lillehaug who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of4to1. Sacchet: It's still 4 to 1 as before. I assume for the same reasons. And summary for council. I believe we all welcome in some form the additional access capability there as it is accessing the church as well as the somewhat landlocked land on the west side there, which was brought in front of us before as a concern. We have concerns about the traffic study not having been completed. We definitely would like to see that completed before it goes to council. I think that's a requirement. We also have an issue about, what was the other one we wanted the council? Whether it needs a light. That's it, the light. That it needs to be looked at and it's connected to the traffic study. That there seems to be high probability that at some point this intersection will have to signalized. And that we wondered whether there might be stipulation in this that the applicant would have to help bear some of the costs of a traffic light. We've had cases like that before where we put in stipulations like that with developments, developers should that arise. I don't know whether we would go as far as putting... Want to add something Rich? Slagle: Directly on that subject, and I would just ask that the council, if that is discussed, that it be in the broad sense of applicants plural. Future applicants. That that is shared with all due respect. Sacchet: It would have to be in the context between the different applicants definitely so. There is the recurring comment that comes from the neighborhood to the west along the lake that they really don't want more roads going in there, which is somewhat in conflict with the comprehensive plan that was envisioning West 7861 somewhat connecting into that area. We don't think that this will ever become a really major frontage road. We believe it's going to stay just a neighborhood access either way. We do think it's 0 Planning Commission Oting — June 15, 2004 0 important for all the road alterations on 41 to follow the full standards of road construction from MnDot and so forth with the turning lanes and everything. We looked at safety and we had some concerns about crossing 41. We want to make sure there's sufficient sidewalks on either side accessing the new parking lot area. I think that was very well received with crosswalks across the islands and then walkway all the way to the end of the parking lot. Additional landscape buffering towards Tanadoona to integrate it more, and also a tree study was kind of absent from this in terms of what are we cutting down. I would think that'd be an element that could be addressed to some extent when it goes in front of council. I would encourage that. And I think that's about the comments. Anything else? Lillehaug: I had one rebuttal comment is, my opinion is that it will have a flavor of a frontage road once this is connected with Crimson Bay. Sacchet: Okay. If it gets connected. If. Lillehaug: If, there we go. Yep. Sacchet: Ahight. And I think that's it for this one. Thank you very much. Wish you luck with this project. Thanks for cooperating and everything. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 13,000 SQUARE FOOT LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 5 AND GALPIN Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Sacchet: Thanks Bob. Questions from staff. Tjomhom: My question is regarding, and I don't know if I missed it in my reading because I could have missed it but the drive thru stipulation. Was there a whole part that showed the hours and you know noise, speakers, lighting, that kind of thing or wasn't there? Generous: There wasn't as part of the staff report, no. Tjornhom: Okay. And I mean, is that something we should talk about or is it okay? Generous: Well if it's a concern of your's, we can definitely request the applicant clarify what their hours of operation are. Tjornhom: We don't have any rules though about hours or anything like that? M City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 9ff OF (952) 227-1100 CHUffin To: Westwood Community Church 3121 Westwood Drive Excelsior, MN 55331 Ship To: Invoice SALESPERSON DATE TERMS KTM 6/3/04 upon receipt Make all checks payable to: City of Chanhassen Please write the following code on your check: Planning Case #04-20 - Westwood. If you have any questions concerning this invoice, call: (952)-227-1107. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! glplan\2004 planning cas \04-20 - westwood community church spr & wap\invoice-gis.doc WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 Pay Date: 6/17/2004 Ck#: 22856 ID#: 3663 CIN OF CHANHASSEN Invoice * Date *Description 060304 *6/3/2004 *Property Owners List * TOTAL 0 022856 Amount * Discount* Net $249.00* $0.00* $249.00 $249.00 * $0.00* $249.00 f 0 0 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 CM OF (952) 227-1100 CNESEH To: Westwood Community Church 3121 Westwood Drive Excelsior, MN 55331 Ship To: Invoice SALESPERSON DATE TERMS KTM 6/3/04 upon receipt QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 83 Property Owners List within 500' of 3121 Westwood Drive (83 labels) $3.00 $249.00 TOTAL DUE $249.00 Make all checks payable to: City of Chanhassen Please write the following code on your check: Planning Case #04-20 - Westwood. If you have any questions concerning this invoice, call: (952)-227-1107. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESSI gAplan\1004 planning cases`04-20 - westwood coaununity church spr & wap\invoice-gisdoc Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Westwood Community Church 3121 Westwood Drive City of Chanhassen Planning Case No. 04-20 P 3 / v 6 r g Lake Minnewashta m 4 J= Subject Property's ® s a �5 Arboretum BoulevardArboretum Boulevard Stale Hwy 5 Arboretumva Bouleva m�s f j� ALAN H & KAREN L DIRKS ALAYNA N SAZENSKI ALLAN D FISCHER 7431 DOGWOOD 2992 VILLAGE LN 7641 ARBORETUM VILLAGE PL EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8013 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4429 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4424 ALLEN K JR & JENNIFER R LARSON ALLEN K LARSON JR ALLISON BALLOU 7647 ARBORETUM VILLAGE LN ALLEN K LARSON SR 2972 VILLAGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4425 7647 ARBORETUM VILLAGE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4428 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4425 AMY WATERS & ANTONIO T REYES BARBARA ANN MILLER KEITH R & CYNTHIA B WATERS 2966 VILLAGE CT 7661 ARBORETUM VILLAGE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4427 VILLAGE MIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4427 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4425 CHA BRANDON B WAGNER BRENDA C BROWN BRUCE A & YVONNE M GESKE 7659 ARBORETUM VILLAGE LN 7634 ARBORETUM VILLAGE CT 7325 HAZELTINE BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4425 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4422 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8038 BYRON A & MARY M OLSON CARLSON CUSTOM HOMES INC CASSANDRA S CRNECKI 7331 HAZELTINE BLVD 2906 BUTTERNUT DR 2971 VILLAGE CT EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8038 CHASKA MN 55318-1111 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4428 RKS CATHERINE A HOLTE CHARLES & JENNIFER NEWELL DANIEL J OF GIB 7630 ARBORETUM VILLAG CIR 7550 DOGWOOD RD TRUSTEED GIBBON TRUST CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4421 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8053 3301 EXCELSIOR N 5 DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8048 DAVID A & MARK D WILLIAMS DAVID L BUSS & PEGGY BULLICK DEBBRA C HILL ERIN KAY STEINKE 2988 VILLAGE LN 7640 ARBORETUM VILLAGE PL 7638 ARBORETUM VILLAGE PL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4429 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4424 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4424 DEREK J & JULIE M FRITZE GETSCH CORP GETSCH CORP 2967 VILLAGE CT C/O DAVID GETSCH C/O JOHN GETSCH CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4428 10202 BERKSHIRE RD 5404 GLENGARRY PKY BLOOMINGTON MN 55438-2265 EDINA MN 55436-2006 GETSCH CORP GUILLERMO E & JAMIE A ARIAS HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN C/O753 DOGWOOD IE GRD 7633 ARBORETUM VILLAGE CT INC 7530 DOGWOOD RD 422 EAST CO RD D EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8053 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4422 ST PAUL MN 55117-1218 JANET M QUIST ETAL JANINE B PUNG JASON DG & 7331 DOGWOOD 2985 VILLAGE LN TARA M DAAILYILY EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8015 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4429 2962 VILLAGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4428 s • JEFFRY KARL RUSSELL JENNIFER A VONESCHEN JOHN & JOYCE FOLEY 7632 ARBORETUM VILLAG CIR 7643 ARBORETUM VILLAGE PL C/O RICHARD J FOLEY CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4421 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4424 4804 M MINNEAPOLIS LN MN 55435-1537 JOHN F ALTENBERND KARIN S MOORE KATE EBLOM 7639 ARBORETUM VILLAGE PL 2991 VILLAGE LN 2963 VILLAGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4424 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4429 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4428 KATHRYN ELLEN GRIEGER KATIE L JORGENSON KEVIN P THOMAS ETAL 2923 ARBORETUM VILLAGE CRV 2964 VILLAGE CT 2975 VILLAGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4423 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4428 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4428 L MARTIN & DONNA R JONES LAURA A BRAHEE LAWRENCE B MARTINEZ TRUSTEES OF TRUST 2989 VILLAGE LN 2969 VILLAGE CT 7321 DOGWOOD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8015 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4429 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4428 MATTHEW J NARDO MATTHEW N STRAND MATTHEW VAVRICHEK & 7650 ARBORETUM VILLAGE PL 2961 VILLAGE CT STEVEN M & KAREN S VAVRICHEK CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4424 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4428 CHANHASSEN VILLAGE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4427 MICHAEL A KISOR MICHAEL B HERMAN MICHAEL C BURROWS 2982 VILLAGE LN 2921 ARBORETUM VILLAGE CRV 2974 VILLAGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4429 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4423 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4428 MICHAEL D & AMY L ARMBRUST MICHAEL D & JANICE M CHOCKLAN MINNESOTA ST HORTICULTURAL 7630 ARBORETUM VILLAGE CT 7651 ARBORETUM VILLAGE PL RM 1 HORTICULTURE BLDG CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4422 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4424 ST PAUL MN 55108- MPLS COUNCIL OF CAMPFIRE MPLS COUNCIL OF CAMPFIRE PATRICIA L HEIEN GIRLS GIRLS 2986 VILLAGE LN 640 GRANT ST E 2610 UNIVERSITY AVE W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4429 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55404-1431 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55114-2007 PATRICK I VANSLYKE PETER T & DEANNA O BRANDY PETERSON REVOCABLE TRUST C/O GRETCHEN STARKS 2984 VILLAGE LN 7570 DOGWOOD RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4429 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8053 3301 EXCELLSIORSIOR MN NTANADOO5 DR 55331-8048 PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA REGENTS OF UNIV OF MINNESOTA CORP REBECCA L POLKOW C/O REAL ESTATE OFFICE 815 NORTHWEST PKY 2947 VILLAGE CIR 319 15TH AVE SE SUITE 140 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4427 424 DON HOWE BLDG EAGAN MN 55121-1580 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55455-0118 u RICHARD C LUNDELL ROBERT A JOHNSON ROGER W OAS 7341 DOGWOOD 2949 VILLAGE CIR 7301 DOGWOOD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8015 CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4427 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8015 SCOTT A VERGIN 7311 DOGWOOD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8015 SHAWN R KERRIGAN 7648 ARBORETUM VILLAGE PL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4424 STEVEN G & CATHLEEN E BUSSLER 2995 VILLAGE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4429 SUZANNE M ZADRA 2943 VILLAGE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4427 THERESA A LINN 7635 ARBORETUM VILLAGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4422 VANESSA T SCHMIDT 2983 VILLAGE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4429 WILLIAM A & IRENE V HINES 7631 ARBORETUM VILLAGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4422 SHANE R CROWE 2993 VILLAGE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4429 SHERRY A BERGS 2994 VILLAGE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4429 SUMIKA CHAI 7649 ARBORETUM VILLAGE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4425 SUZETTE FAHEY 2965 VILLAGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4428 THOMAS J SYLVESTER 7632 ARBORETUM VILLAGE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4422 VINH Q DO NGUYEN 7657 ARBORETUM VILLAGE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4425 WILLIAM E HART 7653 ARBORETUM VILLAGE PL CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4424 SHANNON M HOGAN 7651 ARBORETUM VILLAGE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4425 STACEY L GORRES 2980 VILLAGE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4429 SUSAN MCALLISTER 2930 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4501 TARA L KROEGER 2981 VILLAGE LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4429 TRACY JDOHENY 7634 ARBORETUM VILLAGE CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4421 WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH 3121 WESTWOODDR EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8044 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 04-20 CITY OF CHANHASSEN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 15.2004'at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a Request for Site Plan Approval to expand the parking lot (143 Spaces) and the extensinn of Wn.t � to alter and fill wetlands on site on LnstnM OI, located at 3121 Westwood Drive (west of TH 41 at Tanadoona Drive), Westwood Community Church. A plan showing the location of the Proposal is available for public review at CityHall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opin ions with inspect to this proposal Robert Generous, Senior Planner I Email: beenemusCw t cb h Phone: 952-227- 1131 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 3, 2004; No. 4197) 0 0 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 33IA.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. n, (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. �J was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the tower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abedefghijklmnopgrsm vwxyz Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on /1cf this day of , 2004 Notary Public GWEN M. RADUENZ r/OTARVPUP.LIC MWWSOTA [40mv Commission F_rpiies Jan. 31, 2005 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $22.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $22.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $10.85 per column inch Generous, Bob From: Saam, Matt Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 8:54 AM To: Generous, Bob Subject: Westwood Security Amount Bob, Based on the contractor's bid that we received from Westwood, I have calculated the following required security for this project: Grading/Restoration $269,837 2-4% 81,1 Watermain $8,832 q'1 If Storm Sewer $104,499 -14 41 Streets i)W.78'hSt. $221,160 Z�3Z�L ii) TH41 $35,389 Total $639,717 We'll need to take 110% of the above amount for a grand total security amount of $703,689 Thanks, Matt Saam, P.E. Asst. City Engineer - Chanhassen, MN LN Name and Address of Local Government Unit: City of Chanhassen - 7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147 - Chanhassen, MN 55317 Name of Applicant: Westwood Community Church Application Number: Planning Case 04-20 Type of Application (check one): ❑ Exemption Decision ❑ No Loss Decision ❑ Wetland Boundary and Type Determination ® Replacement Plan Decision ❑ Banking Plan Decision Date of Application: May 14, 2004 (original); August 3, 2004 (revised) Location of Project: NW SW 9 116N 23W '/4 t/4 'A Sec. Twp. Range Summary of Project:This project proposes 30,033 square feet (0.69 acre) of wetland impact for the construction of an access road to the southern portion of the Westwood Community Church property. THE WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN HAS BEEN AMENDED TO ADDRESS CONCERNS BROUGHT TO LIGHT BY THE LGU DURING THE WETLAND PERMITTING PROCESS. THE REVISED WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN (AUGUST 3, 2004) PROPOSES CONSTRUCTION OF 31,650 SQ FT OF NWC; 14,500 SF OF PVC THROUGH PONDING; AND 13,916 SF OF PVC THROUGH WETLAND BUFFERS. You are hereby notified that the above -referenced application was made to the Local Government Unit on the date stated above. A copy of the application is attached. Comments will be accepted on this application until August 25, 2004. A decision on this matter will be made on Friday, August 27, 2004. Contact Lori Haat Water Resources Coordinator at 952.227.1135 for details or changes to decision-making schedule. V ai. Water Resources Coordinator Title List of Addressees: Landowner Westwood Community Church (notice only) Members of Technical Evaluation Panel Chip Hentges, Carver SWCD Brad Wozney, BWSR Page 1 of 2 Westwood Community Church Notice 2 (April 2003) Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization (If Applicable) Mike Wyatt, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Department of Natural Resources Regional Office Julie Ekman, Area Hydrologist DNR Wetlands Coordinator @ Ecological Services Section 500 Lafayette Road, Box 25 St. Paul, MN 55155 Corp of Engineers Project Manager @ Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District ATIN: CO -R, 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1638 Individual members of the public who requested a copy (notice only) Doug Stahl, Pioneer Engineering Page 2 of 2 Westwood Community Church Notice 2 (April 2003) City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Name of Applicant: Westwood Community Church Application Number: Planning Case 04-20 Type of Application (check one): Date of Decision: August 30, 2004 Check One: ❑Approved List of Addressees: [Landowner] Westwood Community Church ❑ Exemption Decision ❑ No Loss Decision ® Replacement Plan Decision ❑ Banking Plan Decision ❑ Wetland Type/Boundary Decision ® Approved with conditions ❑ Denied [Members of Technical Evaluation Panel] Chip Hentges, Carver Soil and Water Conservation District Brad Wozney, Board of Water and Soil Resources [Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization (If Applicable)] Bob Obermeyer, Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District [Department of Natural Resources Regional Office] Julie Ekman, Area Hydrologist Doug Norris, DNR Wetlands Coordinator Ecological Services Section 500 Lafayette Road, Box 25 St. Paul, MN 55155 Joe Yanta, Corp of Engineers Project Manager Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District ATTN: CO -R, 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1638 Westwood Phase 2 Decision - Page 1 of 2 (April 2003) [Individual members of the public who requested a copy, summary only] Doug Stahl, Pioneer Engineering You are hereby notified that the decision of the Local Government Unit on the above - referenced application was made on the date stated above. A copy of the Local Government Unit's Findings and Conclusions is attached. Pursuant to Minn. R. 8420.0250 any appeal of the decision must be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice. [LOCAL GOVE UNIT] August 30, 2004 Sign ture Date Water Resources Coordinator Title - Page 2 of 2 Westwood Phase 2 Decision (April 2003) FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard • P.O. Box 147 • Chanhassen, MN 55317 Name of Applicant: Westwood Community Church Project Location: NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 9, TI 16N, R23W in Chanhassen, MN Type of Application (check one): ❑ Exemption Decision ❑ No Loss Decision Replacement Plan Decision ❑ Banking Plan Decision Date of Decision: August 30, 2004 Findings and Conclusions On July 12, 2004, the Chanhassen City Council approved the Wetland Alteration Permit to fill and alter wetlands on site, subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall develop an amendment to the wetland replacement plan to achieve the required 2:1 replacement without employing credits constructed during the first phase. 2. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). The applicant shall receive the City's approval of a wetland replacement plan prior to any wetland impact occurring. The applicant shall provide proof of recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. 3. A wetland buffer 0 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 10 feet) shall be maintained around all existing and proposed wetlands. (Wetland buffers proposed for PVC must maintain a width of 16.5 feet.) Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and will pay the City $20 per sign. 4. All structures shall maintain a 40 -foot setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. 5. The proposed development shall maintain existing runoff rates. Storm water calculations shall be submitted to staff to ensure runoff rates will not increase as a result of the proposed development. The applicant may work with the Arboretum to ensure their concerns are addressed. 6. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used for mitigation credit and storm water ponds. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tyne of Slone Time (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area Steeper than 3:1 7 days is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 8. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as -needed. 9. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies, e.g. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering) and Army Corps of Engineers and comply with their conditions of approval. CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Title: ater Resources Coordinator Date: August 30, 2004 N89'43'07"W Survey for: WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH • BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, WHICH IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF NORTH 00'32'39" WEST. ��/ J • THIS SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENTS FROM OR \ / ONTO THE HEREON DESCRIBED LAND, EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS WHICH AFFECT SAID LAND J OR ANY IMPROVEMENTS TO SAID LAND, EXCEPT AS SHOWN. THE BOUNDARIES ON THIS SURVEY ARE A COMPILATION OF FOUND MONUMENTATION IN THE FIELD AND INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM SURVEYS PREPARED BY EGAN FIELD AND NOWAK INC. LAST DATED SEPT. 20TH, 2001. 1 r % �<� J • �<� LEGAL DESCRIPTION ./ J That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section --- i 9 and that part of Government Lots 8 and 9 of Section 8, all in Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal � N8T0049"W Meridian, described as follows: ' r 1 r I I n -�-t- &1 822.99 I A K I rI Beginning at the southeast comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 115 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter has a bearing of North 0 A degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West, a distance of 978.50 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West o 14, (6 -� distance of 18.77 feet; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East a distance of 40.00 feet; thence North 69 N'7311411 A/69 /Vsg, \ I degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 638.58 feet; thence North 87 degrees 00 minutes 49 seconds West a I / 73' 13' 6 distance of 822.99 feet; thence South 1 degree 58 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 206.39 feet; thence South 28 44W\4I W degrees 11 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 368.57 feet; thence South 41 degrees 10 minutes 18 seconds West a \ distance of 410.76 feet; thence South 7 degrees 50 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 350.24 feet; thence South 13 w \3\ �\ degrees 35 minutes 53 seconds East a distance of 397.22 feet; thence South 8 degrees 05 minutes 03 seconds East a a, $$,?0 \\ V distance of 38.84 feet; thence North 89 degrees 43 minutes 07 seconds West about 385 feet, to the shoreline of Lake \ V Minnewashta; thence Southerly along said shoreline, to the south line of said Government Lot 8: thence North 89 degrees 40 C r o - \;�`\�\ \ N \ J i minutes 46 seconds East, along said south line of Government Lot 8 about 1756 feet to the southeast corner of said C�S p Government Lot B; thence South 89 degrees 32 minutes 26 seconds East, along the south line of said Northwest Quarter of N \'�� 63g5 \ an the Southwest Quarter, to the southeast comer of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, thence North 00 degrees \ r"Y N70.46'16"� \\-\ 8 \. a` / 54 minutes 38 seconds West, along the east line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to the point of \ J 40.62 iiE-� 1/-��/ i beginning. EXCEPT: (Exception No. 1) N�1, 3\�,_9'f 1 ' 39' '�'BB That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section / 131, 146"6y \ } 9, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: 4./1 _ '\_ 466 Commencing of the southeast comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence North 69 degrees 42 n \ I 30 �ppy�_ �•�,3 j minutes 15 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter has a bearing of North �^ ��? \ J y'"1, A I N\//yr '��tt Fl�1..'� 0 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West, a distance of 978.50 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West a < A00 rn ` 13826 "ky\ v'� \wO \� N6 X684?'1$, I degrees 13 distance of m min.77 utes 44 seconds et; thence SWest, aouth 8 dist nce of 283.38ees 21 sfeet; seconds 19 thence South o10 !degrees 46 minutes feet;stance of 40.00 thence seconds West 9a 94.?• r W distance of 492.43 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 131.14 feet to the point of �• \ \131 1S"ly__ "o) beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 486.30 26 feet;thence West h 10 a distance of 486.30rees 46 tes 16 feet; thence South, a distance of 10 degrees 46 minutes .51 feet; thence 16 seconds West, a1d stance of9451 minutes / V J\7.14 �N ? � � V)) in feet to the point of beginning. O' N69 •� w w 0 \ 1 \ / ice \�R ➢fq •4`a1 a O ALSO EXCEPT: (Exception No. 2) a \�/ \ "�� T W LL\ That art of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section N \ / 8, 9 and that part of Government Lots 8 and 9 of Section 8, all in Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal S $ 1 3 t9 � K % O 3 Meridian described follows: ,� '' � "'-': �`.:.y_,. 18 w z d s bed as 41 e , !` `� - \ ^ r3NNI'/ y,'\ ,<;:';.j 4 A / 4 q 6 33 1 0 w Commencing at the southeast comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence North 69 degrees 42 ' ,;� �Pl� ��� Q�,$�3� OF minutes 15 seconds West, assuming the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter has a bearing of North O /D�,,.` rTA q w v- 0 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West, a distance of 978.50 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West a f to O distance of 18.77 feet; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East a distance of 40.00 feet, to a point hereinafter L/ / 1 a .- • 1 ON--/�(1 \ ^� i , referred to as "Point A", thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 283.38 feet; thence South 10 ``� �`� """�f�.� / degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 492.43 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East a 1 /rv3 I f' Ij co ::::.� j distance of 115.18 feet to the point of the beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing South 71 degrees 39 / _E4 _ 6 seconds East a distance of min teet2 thence North 10 degrees 46 minutes feet seconds East a distance of � i -'c - - / - - 451.81 minutes thence North 71 degrees 39 minutes 6 seconds West. a distance of 131.14 feet thence North 10 degrees 46 rl 'O� � I I / /� \ N4t�. � � \-� )f minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 40.62 � feet; thence North 89 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of L/ / A, I I \` 1 +I m ¢ U ______ 355.20 feet, to a point distant 638.58 feet northwesterly from the above referenced "Point A"; thence North 87 degrees 00 \ �/ /,o v { e .,,� I l /�` =` -•a�� �Z2 TY qsf� \O $ minutes 49 seconds West a distance of 822.99 feet; thence South 1 degree 58 minutes 09 seconds East a distance of 206.39. feet; thence South 28 degrees 11 minutes 51 seconds West a distance of 303.66 feet; thence South 63 degrees 31 < 1 %K /,y1 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 1266.35 feet, to the intersection with a line bearing South 26 degrees 28 minutes 40 `1 111 ( �% 1i seconds West from bthe point of beginning; thence North 26 degrees 28 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 390.62 feet LLJJ 41/ I /'pry 44" / CIO / POINT B - oO / to OD 1 \ �l N M 66.7q l � J M 3 40 NN \ \?710E \ \J II \Vf 1y, IF: - 40 40 1 \ 1084.7 0 J� M N \ s C7 l l J \ 10 r SO8'0S'03" C7 v\ \\ J 385± \ \ \ Fn 4 Z mC A L \ = S LINE OF GOVT. LOT 8, SEC. 8 -- _. _��a D N89'40'46"E 1756+ **A*�c � � * PIOAIEER ,F ®ngineering PA T �� lAia uw08CnvE 55120 681-6488 VA TV TV L. TTI•VV SE CORNER OF GOVT. LOT 8, SEC. 8 '/ I I 1 I I i I I \ :< SITE '� I I I II , SECTION 8, TWP. 116, RGE.23 SECTION 9, TWP. 116, RGE.23 LOCATION MAP LOCATION MAP NO SCALE NO SCALE \ I \ o e pom o e9mnm9. \ 7 \\\�\\ 2Q �' \Vg ALSO EXCEPT: (Exception No. 3) rL •�, `.;: X'\ \ o �� CY All of ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION, according to the recorded plot thereof, including Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and the roads I \\\ 1 \ dedicated to the public in said plat. 'g90\\\`\\`\ Q��°a ALSO EXCEPT: (Exception No. 4) \`�\\``\\ Qcz N That port of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section `p Nine (9), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116) North, Range Twenty-three (23) West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described 9•'�f�-. _1' .\_ \ 1�\ aaCr' as follows: �19 A Commencing at the southeast comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence North 69 degrees 42 \ i\ minutes 15 seconds West assuming the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter has a bearing of North 1 '"Y..• ;` \ 1 `\\\` \ 0 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West, a distance of 978.50 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West a �/�\\", \� - distance of 18.77 feet; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East, a distance of 40.00 feet; thence North 69 �:::�:: degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West, a distance of 283.38 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West, a PRC%Pf ``'�`" _ distance of 492.43 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 617.44 feet; thence North 10 OHD •9NQ "�'•`••`" _` �- degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 451.81 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence By f ••* �, Q continuing North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East; a distance of 56.31 feet; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 1Jyf / L..:,,. \ W seconds West, o distance of 131.82 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 60.84 feet; C/n,fgsf �'��• M thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 131.14 feet to the point of beginning. MfNT \\ . 434 ��,00• �\\ \ 00 00 LI 1 ALSO EXCEPT: (Exception No. 5) 19 1;6 / n That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section Nine (9), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116) North, M\ /Range Twenty Three (23) West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: G C Commencing at the southeast comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence North 69 degrees 42 / • �� J 1 minutes 15 seconds West (based on a bearing of North 00 degrees 35 minutes 15 seconds West for a straight line between the northwest comer and the southwest corner of sold Section 9) a distance of 750.15 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continue North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 228.35 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 18.77 feet to the northerly comer of the easterly end of Field _ Lane, dedicated in SUNSET HILL ON LAKE MINNEWASHTA, according to the found monumentation of the recorded plat thereof; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East, along said easterly end of Field Lane, a distance of 40.00 feet to the /3 > southerly comer of said easterly end of land as monumented; thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West, along the southerly line of said Field Lane as monumented, a distance of 283.38 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 40.62 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East a distance of 486.30 feet; y' N thence North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 60,84 feet to said point of beginning. ` 7 -1 Subject to the easement for electric transmission line purposes originally established by the Easement filed for record January N 9, 1939, in book 43 of Deeds, page 195, as partially released and limited by the Partial Release of Easement filed for record --c November 9, 1990 as Carver County Recorder Document No. 119406. 6097 A 1 ✓� `2'iiy. �` `�s�jJ' \933 L _ WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS \ I y*S �° Nm \goy'• 1A r PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED LAND W LIJ SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DATED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 2004. Ji AI 34 ��',oFOs SIG ED: NEER ENGINEE2P ro mm y-�33 F.QS�' ,V M I 1'\ By �N o iyo Ni/� °sirs fi /: -J Joh Larson, Professional Lond Surveyor Minnesota License No. 19828 ^<\ y/� it ryOA ( .1 /1 O i{, N / 3.3g �P\��p� e^� Z C L y 9j 2763 "> 31.57 11 f �QROyry y' ma, k.,i7j 503418 E �� (� NO6'S5'21'E 5225239'31 <-� 2 �> w2'3445•W % i-' 29.8g / , PRINTED w m , N1 98.79 55? 1 �5832i51'W 380g•W \ /� . w F� 18.94 I \ .ai M.....' Or.�cn n I\ .. 30 0 N25'52' W ,jy\ \ 1 �/ :i. :'y{:i::i Ci:1� t� C � Na660 n ;ajy ��� X�° ) :':::::: % MAY 14 2004 N m �y 2g j g6 f 1 b4'gBW of mo / �> 40.00 y1 \` 1�Y \j j / 8 f 31 I A3643'13 ^ '41 :)Til 16.87 _< <I i�:`'� i.;:>s / PIONEER N04-0 16-97 NI ,� b /,,tf 1W y3jg�,. N / aa�, .;;' : ;.}�:. Til` i `6` .. I ENGINEERING, P.A. f1 �_ 533'1s7s76"W a Al' [2 NS89'40'52"E 24667 "tfA;::: V I/ym ro 1� N 1 m UU ZL z (g' j'1 WI j ! � � z ! -i4i1--i_..,' •moi•. n'V 445.52 f C N1149'52'E <' NOS '215 34E-,, 1 , N89'32'26"W DEED N89'32'52"W MEAS. o� �2�s I 9'08'5 1: 247.JE o e1 y i 1I , I I m1 i i ( Vi:f9i::c f i s 1054.82 .59 248.27��I 1 1 ' f I I ' \� -- S LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC.' 9 1303.09 0 50 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAY 14 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Official Cwy Community Development Dept. DWG.#104049501 NJK 104049 CM-129-X'X'=it3EX'" 1 3573 LEGEND : = CONCRETE ®= CATCH BASIN OO = CASTIRON MONUMENT GRAVEL ;'` `* `': ` '^ ` ■ = ELECTRIC BOX - BITUMINOUS 0 = FENCE CORNER CULVERT ®= FLARED END SECTION = TREE LINE C� = FLAG POLE STORM SEWER LINE �= HYDRANT - > > = SANITARY SEWER LINE = FOUND IRON PIPE WATER LINE 0 = MANHOLE OTHER THAN SANITARY OR STORM MH oh oh oh =OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES -• = UTILITY POLE O = SANITARY OR STORM MANHOLE X X X = FENCE Q = TELEPHONE BOX =TELEVISION BOX 0 = TEST HOLE VA TV TV L. TTI•VV SE CORNER OF GOVT. LOT 8, SEC. 8 '/ I I 1 I I i I I \ :< SITE '� I I I II , SECTION 8, TWP. 116, RGE.23 SECTION 9, TWP. 116, RGE.23 LOCATION MAP LOCATION MAP NO SCALE NO SCALE \ I \ o e pom o e9mnm9. \ 7 \\\�\\ 2Q �' \Vg ALSO EXCEPT: (Exception No. 3) rL •�, `.;: X'\ \ o �� CY All of ZIMMERMAN FARM 1ST ADDITION, according to the recorded plot thereof, including Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and the roads I \\\ 1 \ dedicated to the public in said plat. 'g90\\\`\\`\ Q��°a ALSO EXCEPT: (Exception No. 4) \`�\\``\\ Qcz N That port of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section `p Nine (9), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116) North, Range Twenty-three (23) West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described 9•'�f�-. _1' .\_ \ 1�\ aaCr' as follows: �19 A Commencing at the southeast comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence North 69 degrees 42 \ i\ minutes 15 seconds West assuming the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter has a bearing of North 1 '"Y..• ;` \ 1 `\\\` \ 0 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West, a distance of 978.50 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West a �/�\\", \� - distance of 18.77 feet; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East, a distance of 40.00 feet; thence North 69 �:::�:: degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West, a distance of 283.38 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West, a PRC%Pf ``'�`" _ distance of 492.43 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 617.44 feet; thence North 10 OHD •9NQ "�'•`••`" _` �- degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East, a distance of 451.81 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence By f ••* �, Q continuing North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East; a distance of 56.31 feet; thence North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 1Jyf / L..:,,. \ W seconds West, o distance of 131.82 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 60.84 feet; C/n,fgsf �'��• M thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East, a distance of 131.14 feet to the point of beginning. MfNT \\ . 434 ��,00• �\\ \ 00 00 LI 1 ALSO EXCEPT: (Exception No. 5) 19 1;6 / n That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section Nine (9), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116) North, M\ /Range Twenty Three (23) West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: G C Commencing at the southeast comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, thence North 69 degrees 42 / • �� J 1 minutes 15 seconds West (based on a bearing of North 00 degrees 35 minutes 15 seconds West for a straight line between the northwest comer and the southwest corner of sold Section 9) a distance of 750.15 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continue North 69 degrees 42 minutes 15 seconds West a distance of 228.35 feet; thence South 36 degrees 06 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 18.77 feet to the northerly comer of the easterly end of Field _ Lane, dedicated in SUNSET HILL ON LAKE MINNEWASHTA, according to the found monumentation of the recorded plat thereof; thence South 38 degrees 21 minutes 19 seconds East, along said easterly end of Field Lane, a distance of 40.00 feet to the /3 > southerly comer of said easterly end of land as monumented; thence North 69 degrees 13 minutes 44 seconds West, along the southerly line of said Field Lane as monumented, a distance of 283.38 feet; thence South 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 40.62 feet; thence South 71 degrees 39 minutes 26 seconds East a distance of 486.30 feet; y' N thence North 10 degrees 46 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 60,84 feet to said point of beginning. ` 7 -1 Subject to the easement for electric transmission line purposes originally established by the Easement filed for record January N 9, 1939, in book 43 of Deeds, page 195, as partially released and limited by the Partial Release of Easement filed for record --c November 9, 1990 as Carver County Recorder Document No. 119406. 6097 A 1 ✓� `2'iiy. �` `�s�jJ' \933 L _ WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN OR REPORT WAS \ I y*S �° Nm \goy'• 1A r PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED LAND W LIJ SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DATED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 2004. Ji AI 34 ��',oFOs SIG ED: NEER ENGINEE2P ro mm y-�33 F.QS�' ,V M I 1'\ By �N o iyo Ni/� °sirs fi /: -J Joh Larson, Professional Lond Surveyor Minnesota License No. 19828 ^<\ y/� it ryOA ( .1 /1 O i{, N / 3.3g �P\��p� e^� Z C L y 9j 2763 "> 31.57 11 f �QROyry y' ma, k.,i7j 503418 E �� (� NO6'S5'21'E 5225239'31 <-� 2 �> w2'3445•W % i-' 29.8g / , PRINTED w m , N1 98.79 55? 1 �5832i51'W 380g•W \ /� . w F� 18.94 I \ .ai M.....' Or.�cn n I\ .. 30 0 N25'52' W ,jy\ \ 1 �/ :i. :'y{:i::i Ci:1� t� C � Na660 n ;ajy ��� X�° ) :':::::: % MAY 14 2004 N m �y 2g j g6 f 1 b4'gBW of mo / �> 40.00 y1 \` 1�Y \j j / 8 f 31 I A3643'13 ^ '41 :)Til 16.87 _< <I i�:`'� i.;:>s / PIONEER N04-0 16-97 NI ,� b /,,tf 1W y3jg�,. N / aa�, .;;' : ;.}�:. Til` i `6` .. I ENGINEERING, P.A. f1 �_ 533'1s7s76"W a Al' [2 NS89'40'52"E 24667 "tfA;::: V I/ym ro 1� N 1 m UU ZL z (g' j'1 WI j ! � � z ! -i4i1--i_..,' •moi•. n'V 445.52 f C N1149'52'E <' NOS '215 34E-,, 1 , N89'32'26"W DEED N89'32'52"W MEAS. o� �2�s I 9'08'5 1: 247.JE o e1 y i 1I , I I m1 i i ( Vi:f9i::c f i s 1054.82 .59 248.27��I 1 1 ' f I I ' \� -- S LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC.' 9 1303.09 0 50 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAY 14 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Official Cwy Community Development Dept. DWG.#104049501 NJK 104049 CM-129-X'X'=it3EX'" 1 3573 PIONEER ENGINEERING, P.A. X 2422 ENTERPRISE DRIVE 201 85° AVENUE NW MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55120 ❑ COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 PHONE:(651)681-1914 PHONE: (763)7&}1880 FAX: (651) 681-9488 FAX: (763) 783-1883 City of Chanhassen 690 Center City Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317-0147 CORRESPONDENCE SENT VIA: X MAIL ❑ FAX: ❑ UIHLK LE77ER OF M ° NEW RECEIVED DEC 3 0 2005 DATE: December 28, 2005 IJOBNO. 104049 ATTENTION: Lori Haak RE: 2005 Mitigation Monitoring Report — Westwood Community Church ❑ PAGES INCLUDING TRANSMITTAL COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 12/28/05 1 2005 Mitigation Monitoring Report — Westwood Community Church THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW ❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ AS REQUESTED X FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT REMARKS: COPY TO: Westwood Community Church Doug Stahl, Pioneer Engineering SIGNED: Ken Arndt, Wetland Specialist kamdt@Pion=mg.mn IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE 2005 WCA MITIGATION MONITORING REPORT Westwood Community Church Chanhassen, Minnesota a r-= Local Governmental Units: Project Applicant: Consultant to Project Applicant: PI SNEERengineering F. ' � V �i7�1'�;3� �ti•ly 4 :r� yt' .i'T}'}i �r '•�hY P�� r' (n ... City of Chanhassen Lori Haak 690 Center City Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317-0147 Westwood Community Church 3121 Westwood Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55331 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 2005 Mitigation Monitoring Report Westwood Community Church Chanhassen, Minnesota As requested, Pioneer Engineering has conducted a detailed field review of the replacement wetlands on the parcel in the NW 1/. of the SW 1/, Section 9, Township 116N, Range 23W, Carver County, Minnesota (Figure 1). The replacement wetlands are located adjacent to the existing wetland near the southeast comer of the site (Exhibit 1). The construction began in the fall of 2004. Pioneer staff monitored the replacement area on August 31, 2005. The following is a summary of our findings. METHODOLOGY ' The mitigation area included in this report was analyzed using the criteria listed in Minnesota Rules 8420.0620. The plant species were catalogued as to their percent cover ' and wetland indicator status according to the National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (USFWS Biological Report; March 3 1997). ' MITIGATION MONITORING RESULTS The mitigation wetland was graded according to the approved plan (Exhibits 2 and 3). ' Then the proposed size was compared to the as -built field validated construction. The following table demonstrates that the proposed mitigation exceeded the minimum required New Wetland Credit (NWC) by 1,617 ft (0.04 acre) and the combination of ' wetland buffer (13,916 ft2) and storm water basin (13,916 ftZ) provide the remaining Public Value Credit (PVC) as further detailed in the attached formal report. F ' No erosion problems were observed on the site. The seasonal water level elevation of the mitigation wetland was measured. Monitoring sheets detailing the wetland type, water level and vegetation of the area are contained in the following pages. Plants were also ' mapped for their approximate location in Figure 2. Recent photographs are shown in Figure 3. I U Pheasant Hills Mitigation Monitoring Report December 15, 2005 ' Pioneer Engineering 4104049 We appreciate the opportunity to be of assistance on this project. We will continue to ' submit annual mitigation reports until the wetland is deemed fully functional by the City of Chanhassen. ' If you would like to discuss the project or have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. ' Best regards, ' Pioneer Engineering 4 ' Ken Arndt Wetland Specialist L, L� 1 1 J ' WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT FORM Date of report, December 15, 2005 ' Project Name/Pioneer Engineering Number: Westwood Community Church / 104049 Project location ' Address: 3121 Westwood Drive, off Tanadoona Drive, just north of the intersection of Highways 5 and 41, Chanhassen, Minnesota Township 116N , Range 23 Section 9 (See Figure 1) Replacement/Construction completed: Fall 2004 [approximate] New Wetland was created along the eastern edge of the existing wetland located near the southern border of the site. (See Exhibits 1 & 2 wetland mitigation) The mitigation wetland was created for impacts on the existing wetland incurred for the extension of 78t' Street. In the first report only, a comparison of the as -built specifications versus the design specifications is required along with an explanation of significant discrepancies or modifications. For each subsequent year, a comparison of existing conditions in the wetlands and explanations of any significant changes are necessary. Explanation: The replacement area has been constructed as planned. mitigation Wetland Desc!] tion(s) Circular 39 Type Wetland Fill] Impact (s.f. / acres Replacement size NWC Public Value Credit PVC Impact 2 30,033 / 0.69 PEMC 30,033 ft Wetland replacement 2 0.73 acre Buffer 0.33 Stormwater and 0.32 TOTALS 30,033 / 0.69 0.73 acre 0.65 acre In the first report only, a comparison of the as -built specifications versus the design specifications is required along with an explanation of significant discrepancies or modifications. For each subsequent year, a comparison of existing conditions in the wetlands and explanations of any significant changes are necessary. Explanation: The replacement area has been constructed as planned. mitigation Wetland Desc!] tion(s) ID Planned Size Planned Type (Cowardin) Current Size Current Type Area 1 30,033 PEMC 30,033 ft PEMC Seasonal Water Level Elevation / Areal Coverage (taken April throw h October ID: Date measurement taken: I Waterlevel. Area 1 October 3,2005 2-8" ' A map of plant communities within the boundaries of the replacement site, including hydrologic indicators observed is required. List the dominant vegetation found in the wetland. Estimate the percent coverage of each type present. Include the common names of the vegetation that exceed 20 percent coverage. (Wetland mitigation areas greater then 0.5 acres require plant descriptions from two locations.) See Figure 2 for a map of existing plant communities PIONEER Pioneer Engineering 211g111CC7111g 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 65120 I 11 I I 1 V 1 I I Area 1 List of Dominant Ve etation Common name Scientific name Hydrophytic status (OBL, FACW, FAC, FACU, UPL' Percent coverage Cattails T ha glauca OBL 50 Barnyard grass Echinochloa crus- alli FACW 60 Smartweed Polygonum pennsylvanica FACW+ 10 Waterhernp Amaranthus rudis FACW 5 Water plantain Alisma planta o -a uatica OBL 1 Monke flower Mimu/us nn ens OBL 1 Blue vervain Verbena hastata FACW- 1 Sandbar willow Salix exi ua OBL 2 UBL = Obligate Wetland, has an estimated 99% probability of occurrence in wetlands. FACW = Facultative Wetland, has an estimated 67%-99% probability of occurrence in wetlands. FAC = Facultative, is equally likely to occur in wetlands and non -wetlands (34%-66% probability). FACU = Facultative Upland, occurs only occasionally in wetlands (1%-23% probability). UPL = Upland, almost never occurs in wetlands (<1% probability). NI = No Indicator, insufficient information available to determine an indicator status. Positive or negative signs indicate a higher (+) or lower (-) frequency of occurrence within a category. See Figure 3 for current photographs of the project area taken during the growing season. Describe management activities and/or corrective actions undertaken in the previous year (if applicable): NA Describe management activities and/or corrective actions planned for the upcoming year (if applicable): NA Ken Arndt (Agent for the Applicant) Pioneer Engineering 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 ' PL1 V EE1\ Pioneer Engineering Cngineering' 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Westwood Community Church Chanhassen, Minnesota Legend Site Boundary Approximate Mitigation Boundary Carver County Roads 720 360 0 N W+E S 720 Feet Westwood Community Church 120 60 Chanhassen, Minnesota mmff::� Legend Approximate Mitigation Boundary Site Boundary it Barnyard grass Cattail +� Smartweed 0 120 Feet Figure 2 PIONEERengineering Cover: Northern portion of the mitigation area od Community Church Chanhassen, Minnesota Fiqure 3 PIZNEERengineering 0 0 ' *PIONEER _ *an lnearingPA *, j LVID PL WxfASixtlSCME YtO111ECR 0 _�`�= Q�� \ � ;'•1514 ( --�- \__ L 104DO-FINAL-WETLAND MIT EXHIBIT.DNG W 55120 Dote 7-30-04PROJECT NA,- -'!8° Designed Dns WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH — WETLAND MITIGATION EXHIBIT 1 IMPACT AND REPLACEMENT AREA SEE EXHIBIT 2 I I I 1 ISI �l ,--_--- 104DO-FINAL-WETLAND MIT EXHIBIT.DNG W 55120 Dote 7-30-04PROJECT NA,- -'!8° Designed Dns WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH — WETLAND MITIGATION EXHIBIT 1 WETLAND C \ �-- •♦ voovao aoo ov vo \c�,,� �I / j,/n avvvv \ '\•' �l D � � 83'IL'°O ° ' v voo ev vv ooe v v v TEA E T P \P LIC\VA\UE RED T,' �t4 00 \ A ��0SF.WETLAND CREDIT //// . 0 SF. o° (o / GRADE�CJ ULATING 8 TT / �' / 1 \ { BETWEEN 981'0 7� � �� : ' ::.:'::':.:'::':. :::... v / I� SEED WITH MNDOT MI 1 f ✓` WITH WET FORBS. C /EXISTING NEW WET / ;�;.;.'.: D C CREDIT AREA TO / I / DTI to / EXISTING WV, UFFER / I / TO BEC TO NEW 3:1 WETLA�tg� REA A co co SSC : Q ' }} } vv I EW WE LA BU ER / /: M / y , WETLAND ILL 30,033 SF # vv zJ I I I , ,.:.. ::"::'.. I .............. 00 0-24 / v -- - 1 - * PIONEER engineering;;— ........... w .1�.Yd► �Y!PIY1�:wwrwr..w.rv.,.��� . elr�Fr.d'.JT�fi 'e!i!►' .. �..,....,;..4r.YrY..r �'' r;rk MN 55120 PROJECTMITIGATION 1914 FM:681-94a8 WETLAND ••D COMMUNITY Cfff OF WHASSEV Date: May 17, 2004 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 By: Robert Generous, Senior Planner Subject: Request for Site Plan Approval to expand the parking lot (143 spaces) and the extension of West 78h Street, and a Wetland Alteration Permit to alter and fill wetlands on site on property zoned Office and Institutional District, OI, located at 3121 Westwood Drive (west of TH 41 at Tanadoona Drive), Westwood Community Church. Planning Case: 04-20 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on May 14, 2004. The 60day review period ends July 13, 2004. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on June 15, 2004 at 7:00 p.m in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than June 4, 2004. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official L Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Watershed District Engineer 3. Soil Conservation Service 4. MN Dept. of Transportation 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 7. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 8. Telephone Company (Qwest or United) 9. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 10. Medicom 11. U. S. Fish and Wildlife 12. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 13. Camp Tanadoona 14. U of M Landscape Arboretum W 7�- DL.% '9,, 5.5, 0 e54&jctz� S4" 1, Pow MA -<- )&b 6- boylc ,; 1�1- Cell a a-Cei1 3-Y Y& --s ov� Rql. Des', y%oLy -a 5/oy -7/DL( fo CC �C road 3`Z- E`0V /= 3�em IRow 3i or isr w -P- Ilei- — --- - AA&q)Al moo' r2oh/_ - Name and Address of Local Government Unit: City of Chanhassen - 7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147 - Chanhassen, MN 55317 Name of Applicant: Westwood Community Church Application Number: Planning Case 04-20 Type of Application (check one): Date of Application: May 14, 2004 ❑ Exemption Decision ❑ No Loss Decision ❑ Wetland Boundary and Type Determination ® Replacement Plan Decision ❑ Banking Plan Decision Location of Project: NW SW 9 116N 23W r/4 '/a r/4 Sec. Twp. Range Summary of ProjectThis project proposes 30,033 square feet (0.69 acre) of wetland impact for the construction of an access road to the southern portion of the Westwood Community Church property. You are hereby notified that the above -referenced application was made to the Local Government Unit on the date stated above. A copy of the application is attached. Comments will be accepted on this application until June 4. 2004. A decision on this matter will be made on Monday. June 7, 2004. Contact Lori Haak. Water Resources Coordinator at 952.227.1135 for details or changes to decision-making schedule. LO NT UNIT Sign Water Resources Coordinator Title List of Addressees: Landowner Westwood Community Church (notice only) Members of Technical Evaluation Panel Chip Hentges, Carver SWCD Brad Wozney, BWSR 5 z. i LoLl Date Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization (If Applicable) Mike Wyatt, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Page 1 of 2 Westwood Community Church Notice 2 (April 2003) Department of Natural Resources Regional Office Julie Ekman, Area Hydrologist DNR Wetlands Coordinator @ Ecological Services Section 500 Lafayette Road, Box 25 St. Paul, MN 55155 Corp of Engineers Project Manager @ Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District ATPN: CO -R, 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1638 Individual members of the public who requested a copy (notice only) Doug Stahl, Pioneer Engineering Page 2 of 2 Westwood Community Church Notice 2 (April 2003) Haak, Lori From: Renae Clark [rclark@minnehahacreek.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 9:39 AM To: Lhaak@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Subject: Westwood Community Church, 04-20, WCA Notice Lori, I have reviewed the replacement plan for the above mentioned project. The application appears to be in compliance with the Wetland Conservation Act. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. Renae Clark District Technician 18202 Minnetonka Blvd. Deephaven, MM 55391 Ph. 952-471-0590 Fx. 952-471-0682 REPLACEMENT PLAN APPLICATION Westwood Community Church Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for Westwood Community Church Prepared by Pioneer Engineering CITYOF RECEIVEDSSEN APR 3 0 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEP? NA -026620-0313 (V.2.01 for MS WORD)02/14/03 Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects USE THIS APPLICATION FOR ANY PROJECT AFFECTING A LAKE, RIVER, STREAM OR WETLAND, INCLUDING: Local Government Unit Approval Pursuant to Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Act (WCA) Minnesota Departrnent of Natural Resources (DNR) Permit to Work in Public Waters Department of the Army Permit (33 CFR 325) Note: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) will forward application forms to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for processing if state water quality certification is required from the MPCA. You do not need to said this application to the MPCA. This application packet includes: Part I: The BASIC APPLICATION and the COE APPLICATION to be filled out by all applicants (see Instructions). PART H: The REPLACEMENT PLAN SUPPLEMENT to be completed only for projects that impact wetlands and require a replacement plan for wetland mitigation. If you're not sure whether your project requires a replacement plan, call your Local Government Unit (LGU) or Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office for guidance. Do not proceed with your project until you have received all required approvals from your LGU, the DNR and the COE. If you wish to confirm the status of your application at any time, contact the agencies directly (see Instructions, page 2). Proceeding with work before all required authorizations are obtained may result in fines or other penalties, and may include a requirement to restore the project site to original condition. If you have questions or need assistance with filling out these forms, contact your local SWCD office, your LGU, your Area DNR Waters office, or your COE field office (see Instructions, page 2). If you believe that your project may be subject to watershed district, local zoning, or any other local regulations besides those of your LGU, contact those office(s) directly. If you are a Federal Farm Program participant and your project affects a wetland or water body on agricultural land, your eligibility for USDA benefits may be affected. Contact a Natural Resources Conservation Service office for further information. A QUICK LOOK AT THE PROJECT APPLICATION PROCESS Electronic tiles: Fours can be downloaded and filled out using Microsoft Word Your input will be restricted to fill-in fields wbae users can enter text or check boxes. These areas appear gray on the screen, btu not on the printed document Send copies of these completed application forms to your LGU, your Area DNR Waters office, and your COE regulatory office. Any of the agencies may make initial contact with you m: a) inform you that it has nojudsdiction ova your project, b) request additional information needed; or c) inform you of applicable fees. When your application is considered complete and appropriate fees have been received (if requested) it will be distributed for appropriate review. Following agencies' reviews, you will be informed if it has been approved, appmved with changes or conditions, withdrawn, or denied. For information about state laws, rules and regulations that direct this process go to the web site www.revisonleg.state.mn.us. For information on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulations go to the web site www.mvp.usace.army.mil. Instructions for Part I HELP 1: Every applicant must fill out Section 1. The applicant is the person, agency, company, corporation, or other organization that owns, leases, or holds other legal rights to the land where the project is located. Indicate names of multiple applicants on a separate sheet. HELP IA: Fill out Section IA only if you have designated an authorized agent. An authorized agent may be an attorney, builder, consultant, contractor, engineer, or any otherperson or organization designated by the applicant to represent him/her in this process. An agent is not required. HELP 5: Purpose, description and dimensions of project: State briefly (in a sentence or two) what you propose to do and why it is needed. Also, describe whether your project will involve any of the following: Construction of stmctures, filling, draining, dewatering, removing, excavating or repair. - Construction of an access path, bridge, culvert, dam, ditch, dock, driveway, riprap, road, sand blanket, shore protection, or tile line. Construction of any structures on fill, piles or a float -supported platform. If so, describe. [hedging or discharging (placing fill material) into a wetland or other water body (including the temporary placement of material). If so, explain the specific purpose of the placement of the material (such as erosion control) and indicate how it will be done (such as with a backhoe or dmgline). If dredged material is to be discharged on an upland site, identify the location of the site. Minnesota I.ocal/State/Fedeml Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects Instructions, Page 1 Include an overhead view drawing showing the work to be undertaken and its relative location on the property. Show items such as property boundaries or lot dimensions; location and extent of shoreline, wetlands and water, location and dimensions and footprint of the proposed project, structure or activity (include length, width, elevation and other measurements as appropriate); points of reference such as existing homes, structures, docks or landscape features; indication of north; and location of spoil and disposal sites (if applicable). Hand drawn, computer generated or professionally prepared drawings are acceptable, as long as they contain all necessary information clearly, accurately, and in adequate detail. Please include specific dimensions whenever possible. You may also include photos, if you wish. HELP 7: For information regarding adjacent landowners, contact the tax assessor where the project is to be developed HELP 8: H any part of the work has already been completed, describe the area already developed Include a description of structures completed; any dredged or fill material already discharged (including type of material and volume in cubic yards); acres or square feet filled (if a wetland or other waterbody); and whether the work was done under an existing permit (if so identify the authorization, if possible). HELP 9: Other permits, reviews or approval related to the project may include the following: conditional use permit; plat approval; zoning variance; National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit; state disposal system permit (includes dredged material disposal); watershed district/watershed management organization permit (sormwater, erosion, floodplain); environmental assessment worksheet/environmental impact statement; hazardous waste site; feedlot permit; groundwater appropriation permit; or county/township driveway/road permit. Are you aware of any archeological or cultural resource determinations or surveys completed concerning the project or replacement site by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) or others? If yes, please explain on a separate sheet or attach a copy of any determinations or surveys. Final Checklists (Part I) ® Have you completed all of Part I (Page 1), plus the Federal application (Page 2)? ® Did you (and your agent, if applicable) sign Section 10 on page 1? ® Have you signed the Application for the Department of the Army Permit (Page 2) to seek Federal authorization of your project? ® Have you included the necessary attachments for Part I? Attachments must include: ® Site Locator Map (Section 3) ® Type of Project (Section 4) (if additional space was needed) ® Overhead View of Project (Section 5 and HELP 5) ® Project Purpose, Description and Dimensions (Section 5) (if additional space was needed) Attachments may also include: ® Applicant Contact Information (HELP 1) (if additional space was needed) ® Project Location (Section 3) (if additional space was needed) ® Project Alternatives (Section 6) (if additional space was needed) ® Photographs ® Adjoining Property Owners (Section 7) (if additional space was needed) ® Work Already Completed Section (Section 8) (if you answered YES) ❑ State Historic Preservation Office determination or survey Submitting Your Application Make three copies of the entire application and all attachments. Keep the original, and mail a complete copy of your application to each of the local, state, and Federal entities listed below. Be sure to include Part I and all attachments with each application. LOCAL: Send to the appropriate Local Government Unit (LGU). If necessary, contact your county Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office or visit the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BW SR) web site (www.bwsr.state.mn.us) to determine the appropriate LGU. STATE: Send to your Area DNR Waters office, attention Area Hydrologist If necessary, contact your county Soil and Water Conservation District (S W CD) office or visit the DNR website (wwwArinstate.mn.us) to locate the Area Hydrologist for your location, or contact a Regional DNR office: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: 2115 Birchmont Beach Road N.E. 1201 East Highway 2 1200 Warner Road 261 Highway 15 South Bemidji, MN 56601 Grand Rapids, MN 55744 St Paul, MN 55106 New Ulm, MN 56073 Phone: 218-755-3973 Phone: 218-327-4416 Phone: 651-772-7910 Phone: 507 359-6053 FEDERAL: Send to the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulatory field office Brainerd: St. Paul: La Crescent: U.S. COE, Regulatory Branch U.S. COE, Regulatory Branch U.S. COE, Regulatory Branch 10867 E. Gull Lake Drive N.W. Army Corps of Engineers Centre 1114 South Oak Street Brainerd, MN 56401-9051 190 5th Street East La Crescent, MN 55947-1338 Phone: 218-829-8402 St Paul, MN 55101-9051 Phone: 507-895-8059 Phone: 651-290-5375 WEB SITES: BWSR: www.bwar.saae.traw U.S. ACOE: www.mvp.usace.amny.mil DNR: www.dnnstate. us Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forns for Water/Wetland Projects Instructions, Page 2 Two Harbors: U.S. COE, Regulatory Branch 1554 Highway 2, Suite 2 Two Harbors, MN 55161 Phone: 218-834-6630 MPGA: www.pca.state.�= Q4/:g/U4 lo:UU LAA vac cc+ ,uya ........... ..--- -- ENG PAGE 02/04 014/29/2664 15:36 6516819486 PIaEER ENG 41113 NA -026620-038 (V2.01 fO+M$WORD) 01'/14103 Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Form for Water/Wetland Projects PART 1: BASIC APPLICATION "$ee HELP'di— yeu to anpmrtamadditiona)Intormalim aM aadabtnee1a Iaa 60n4Peat 1. 1. LANDOWNER/APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION (SeeNstP 1) 9J>— 1'AL/ — Name: Westwood CommunMy Church Phone 952 -off -lit o Complete mailing address: 3i}( Wcai.loadr ce(sty / sS33( 1A AUTHORIZED AGENT (See Aelp IA) (Only Ijapplieadle,' as aRav K rml rgrfred) Nerve: 81H Bleekwenn Man: 851 681.1914 Complete mailing addteaa! Pioneer Engineering, 2422 Enterprise Drive, Mendota tasiglds, MN 55120 2. NAME, TYPE AND SIZE OF PURLIC WATERS or WE77.ANDS LNIPACTED (Amish Addrrbna/ Pmjrnt area sheets if seede(r) Nine or I.D. p of Waters Impacted (if applicable: if known$ (Check all that apply): []Lake []Riva E]Wedand type ® t [] IL ® 2 ® 3 04 O 5 O 6 M 7 O g Indicate site of entire lake orwedand (check me): 0 Lelip than 10 an= (indicate six 2.5 aa) C] 10 to 40 acres ❑ Greatr, than 40 acro 3. PROJECT LOCATION pnjormanon can bejm r,d on pmpeny rax sraremrsr, property title Dr drle inns ansa): Project an address: Trunk Highway 41 & W. 78" St. Fire #: City (if rtpplieable): Chanhassen tA Saetbd: SW Section: 9 Township #: 116 Range # 23 Courcy: Carver Lm#! Brock: Subdivision: Warershed(mmoe or 4) 20053 Anacb a sbnple site bettor map. If nVAed, include on the map wridco d'imeniorts to the nice flan a known location or landmadt. and provide distances from known locations. Label the dim =LOCATOR MAP. 4. TYPE OF FROJ&LT: Describe the type of proposed work. Attach TYPE Of PROJECT sheet if needed. see attached S. PROJECT PURPOSE, DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS: ocscnbc what yon plan to do and why it is mated. bow you plan to conotruet Mc project with dimataimn prngth, width, depth), am of impact and wbm You propose to construct theproject. Thisis the mart important part of your application. See HELP 5 before completing this section: see What To Include on Plana Unem,etims. page 1). Anech PROJECT DESCRIPTION sheet see attached Footprint of project acres or 30,033 square feet drained. filled or muvated 6. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES: What alternatives to this proposcd project have you mnsida:4 that would avoid or minimize impactr to wetlands a waters7 List at lait TWO additional alter ivts to your project in Section 5 that avdd weliands (me of which rosy be "no build' or "do nothing'), and explain why you chose to pursue the option described In tris application Over these alternatives. Attach PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ahett if needed. see attached narrative 7. ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: For projects that impact more than 1 D.000 square feet of water or wetlands, list the complete mailing addregncs of adjacent property owners an an attached reparatc sheat. (See HELP 7) S. PORTION OF WORK COMPLETED: Is any portion of tho work in welland or water arose already completed? [] Ycs ENO. If yes, describe the eomplrted work m a sepatam sheet of papa labcicd WORK ALREADY COMPLETED. (see HELP S) 9. STATUS OF OTHER APPROVALS: List my other permits, reviews or approvals related roMip proposed project that are either pending or have already been approved or denied cad it soparare &trached sbeet See HELP 9, 10. 12M applying for state and local sathorimtien to conduct the work descrfbed in this application. I am fmmliar with the infottnatim contained in this application. Tei Mcbcyt of my knowledge and belief, all infglmarion in Part 1 is true, complete and eccurstc. I posses qthctaity w undortnkc the work described, or I mn, meting as Me duly meth red of the liont. re aitapplittygr (La dowwma pate, Signaure ojagent (if applicable) Dam This block moot be atpnd eY tare per*an win desires ro mrdemkr dee prowa.d aadsiry and ham the metemiry property rights n do ao. IS Doty rhe Aemt 1i piancd, piwso moan o aepafLLt slice v}mea [ry the lantlovna, giving nece>anry BrahOriraticm to Ne Agert. Mir m=IouVSUMMederal APP1=aon Fane fm WMMIWVJond Pmjecls 04/28/04 15:101) FAX 85Z Z24 7001 wLbinuyy Win WILIL.n ,04129/2884 15:36 6516819488 PIONEER ENG 9- Vv, PAGE b3/¢4 all. 211151 Taepublic-burden for this rogoeuen rrf mflmmalion tr. esnmNedo anmgc 10 noun per rrapan•c. Nlhmah a.r TgiOntY of Spplisomen ebould apdre:❑van W", tens.M.. do sbse Yo.:w,ealnP onerousness. amrohing a "rtl Own s•mRs, "rfie init 04 r sintaaae dif dm weed d DOW wiss"Plow" and reeiewsog the e.1kction of Nasesso sL SIW COn11MOR M1aO.Jing d.is turdsn G[1iTpeefhor edlereefeelef 1Ropon,121 Mn:rermPVen.lnC19tI.P.59uh:dCMfaruattstS Nll.a202-402 Nh Cm of ie ofMa Ndo., Needgwrtm Scrviu Dirtelapl<ef bBsm•tion OpmeNu unit Repotm, 1215 JeR<sson Davis I9lyhwaY. Suit 7209. AniagtDM1 VA 272011)a2::ma n use (Mhce ofManPemrnt and BodPeL Pelsawark Roduellon Reirc! (071400D3)weddnpmn, lOC 20503. RemOndm4 Mould w awac can nOnYlthrNpdisg ani' otlLer pmvtnon of la•..o tRhsoa nbali bo NlhaM ith-to toy psaNp' for Biline a OoaplY'a'iU • roslvtion Olinmrmadon if h mer nes dlvplay n cwnn,LtywrNd Ot.10 soraOl aumbor. Flame DO )IO'f RGRIRN year krm o Uaa svlM1efLN. CanPleNd eppedoent aw11n IObalted a Bc Diemtt eagirhrsr MdnH)0drdimM mer aw M'pdaa of sM pmpoNd o:bviry- PRIVACV ACT STATEMENT: Authaelliw Bi en end HOrhms Am Senlon 10. 13 t1SO 403: QGrn Wohn AOL aeeaon409. 33 USC 13M: Marble PmpeE4h. Refnech nod S.iecwenes Act. 33 USC 1413, Scolbn t D3. Pnnvi sol ennOs. Intonation provided on Wie form will at med N nrtluamg the 1Ppltea1611 for a Penh- aswnne nes'. The infaapban aeybeyoadwltls the DcMreabd arlwea Ono Oshrr Fedml. eras. frd local Powss"ennagexaes. Submission erergeuod irdomadon if voltrwN:hmvwe...f bnaman 'e.d tie ' l epi' be f xd Oenelt M Ivod ITEMS 1 TffitOUGH 4 TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CORPS I. APPLICATION NO. 11. MV.D OFFICE CODE 13. DATE, AECWVED 1 4. DATE APPLIC A77ON CONPLETrD YOU DO NOT NEED TO COMPLETE ITEMS 6.10 and 12.25 in the SHADED AREAS. All applirirrlm mart complctc cox sibuided irerns 5 wLd 26, If an agent is used, ileo complete ItemL g and 11. Thio opeional Federal form is valid 5. APPLICANT'S NAMEI It. Allh10RIZFA AOFNT'S NAME AND TTILE (aa OPW u not mgebed) Weatweed Coiisna'l' Church 8i Bledtwarn, Lande"aps Arehileot 11. STATEMENT OF AUTPORIY.ATION (i/'oppf3c4bfe; cosrrP(Ne only ti mdes risnE en avm0 I hereby aothonca BI0 glarAwenn 10 net ac- snybebalf ere my are in theprocsaving of Osis applieniop Send Im ll. upon Coolness, isupplorrusnial fnrmuanN (tti 7"\-AFrLICANT'SMGNATe perps�st'on. s? 1��. ✓!' '.n:v..: x i""^ ra.a XIisi•..�'" ;.v '3'L'�'' ir`b.....��:3dv.. x �y, �'•r+'tie.>t'." .fx P qp- '^'.1i''T1 Yq'Si'4 N,'iw .. � ' S ,f..v ,4.Y"'•I"i'_;r� , , y.n:.r.'.�'J7t rf ,��..y, i.. x"ri f ..5..=�✓;_,r_.., n . � fW.ik"S wiiF"- j7�'_Tl1 ..c....v >a�Wr"'° z^. �•Li�j'a.6L.: •�, r:S 4� W^1 W . a; v., _�. eS:S ... � •Sh � r �� Cv �W'I �'�� L:" .qx.q. L�rkY 4"t AN ♦pf- , f :•e {+: f.e Y1 S". {y w+'�W4'R''@l'flEKLW1IF g `r MIR � -;5(.. 4f4 • d -rf. .ams rajS,si�,. h .y.rR. .�. �. iP,1Y at �£.,', Id't"' ; 'lf.�.Cb��.�" ,,.111',1�a.?:3'�i>,G.-� � im'';Y-'�: s -ru `n4 �?=i :•�, :. 's4r'iC]�7'.s.�a11nLIY�Qr���.if�*arPi','Ilf„., ::.d. .....x:'•� -s ±.'yt.,pi.�_kJC;41 =_ _s:7r�.{w.r. 26. Applicoton u hereby made far a permh or pernnits to authoive the work described in this application. I certify then the information in this application is complete grid accurate, I funkier certify that 1 pooaeso tho authority m undertake the wttrk dmenbed herein or am acting as the duly aLI` ed agent of the ppplieafft. Si ,acre ot'npphi Date pwtfse offliassetfmy) bt 71 a application rmvt be signed 6y ere person w.be desires to undoakc the prnpo•ed activ" (atrPtimrt). rr it may be all try a study sdsafatd agent if the rw mtm m Bloom I 1 hu bem filled can wW spw& is Q.S.C. Section 10111 psovids that. vi hoe a. in any manner within theiseisdlcdon of my department Or eirese • of hhe i)nitsd 9enc: ktsownsgly and willfully fahiifim, eoweals. Or enver7 op with my triol eohtme, or dut wsss a irsawisil foot m ma]ae apo Bbc, ul o , a SaL inmt emtspaoa. or ed not nmdeas or.I n,00 or Lace fay ed n caning th sl Gw y e rs, or beYf sat to cmtaon any BI1e. fiatdsquf or InudW scar nooentwna m anry, call be fiord not more then 5110,000 er itesprisaned not mors man cave yens or 6odi. ENG FORM 4345, Jul 97 EDMON OF FEB 94 IS OBSOLETE. (proponent, CECW-OR) hfirmcroh l.ocfl/SBm'FedamI Applicadorl Forme for Wxr Vetmd Projezu Page 2 Instructions For Part II Complete those portions of Part Il: Replacement Plan Supplement for which information is readily available (such as location, existing land use, size of impact area, etc.) A person certified in wetland delineation must determine items pertaining to specific wetland impacts (wetland type, predominant vegetation, watershed time, etc.) Contact the local soil and water conservation district (SWCD) office for further information on obtaining such items. What to Include on Plans Detailed overhead views of replacement site(s) (Part Il), as well as profile view(s) of replacement site(s) (Part Il), may be either hand drawn, computer generated or professionally prepared, as long as they contain all necessary information clearly, accurately, and in adequate detail. Please include specific dimensions whenever possible. You may also include photos, if you wish. Overbead views of Part lI replacement site(s) should include the following items that pertain to your project Property boundaries and/or lot dimensions. Location and extent of shoreline, wetlands and water. Location and dimensions of proposed project, structure or activity. Include length, width, elevation and other measurements as appropriate. Points of reference (such as existing homes, structures, docks or landscape features). Location of inlet and outlet structures. Indication of north. Location of spoil and disposal sites (if applicable). Areas of wetland and upland plants established. Profile views (side or cross-sectional views) should include the following items that pertain to your project: Location and dimensions of proposed project, structure or activity. Include elevation, depth, soil profile, side slope and other measurements as appropriate. Proposed water level elevation. Final Checklists Part If: Replacement Plan Supplement ® Have you completed all of Part H (pages 3-5)? ® Did you (or your agent) sign Section 19 on page 5? ® Have you included the necessary attachments for Part H? Attachments must include: ® If the project includes any wetland banking (complete or partial), include Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits Form (Section 14) ® If the project includes any project -specific replacements (complete or partial), include: Description of Replacement Wetland(s) Construction (Section 15) Copy of vegetation management plan (Section 15) Scale drawing of overhead view or replacement wetland (Section 18) Scale drawing of profile view of replacement wetland (Section 18) Attachments may also include: ® Additional description of Welland Impact Charts (Section 11) (if additional space was needed) ❑ Additional Description of Replacement Wetlands charts (Section 17) (if additional space was needed) ❑ Additional soils information for created replacement wetland(s) (Section 18) (if available) Note: To deposit surplus wetland credits in the State Wetland Bank, submit a Wetland Banking Application directly to your LGU (Section 16). Preparing Your Application for Mailing ® To apply for both state and Federal authorization, your application must include Part I (Page 1), the Federal application (Page 2), and attachments as indicated an Final Checklist for Part I (Instructions, Page 2). ® Your application must also include Part H (Pages 3-5) and additional attachments as indicated on Final Checklist for Part d (above). ® Make three copies of the entire application and all attachments. Keep the original, and mail the three copies to the appropriate local, state, and Federal agencies (see Instructions for Part I for addresses). Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Welland Projects hrstrucrions Page 3 PART II: REPLACEMENT PLAN SUPPLEMENT For assistance in completing Part 77, contact vour Local Governmenr Unit or a professional consultant 11. DESCRIPTION OF WETLAND IMPACTS: Complete the char below: 1) Use one row of boxes for each wetland impact; 2) If your project bas more than one wetland impact, reference vow overhead view (part of Section 5) to this chart by identifying and labelmg'Yust impact" and "second impact" on your overhead view; 3) If you are identifying only one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the first dotted line and leave the others blank; 4) If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each wetland type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted area for each separate wetland type within that impact area; 5) If you do not have access to some of this information, call vow LGU or SWCD office for assistance. (Photocopy chart for more impacts. if needed.) DESCRIPTION OF WETLAND IMPACTS Wetland impact (as noted on overhead view) Watershed name or number (if known) County, Section, Township, Range Wetland type' Predominant vegetation in impacted wetland area Size of area impacted (in acres or square feet) Existing land use in project area (check all that apply) 20055 9,116,23 1/2 reed 30,033 sq.ft. ® Housing canarygrass, ®Commercial First ------ -hu--ptrter----------------------- ❑ Industrial impact ® Parks/recreation areas ® Highways and ------------------- ------------------------ --------- associated rights-of-way ® Forested ® Fatmsteadslagricultural ® Vacant lands ❑ Public and semi-public (schools/gov't facilities) ❑ Airports Second ----------------- ----------------- -------------- ❑ Extractive (gravel impact pits/quarries) ❑ Other: 'If you are identifying only one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the fust dotted line and leave the others blank If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each separate wedand type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted arra for each separate wetland type with that impact arm. TOTALS OF AREA(S) IMPACTED FOR EACH WETLAND TYPE ON CHART (indicate acres ❑ or square feet 0) Type: 1: _ 1L:2: 30033 3: 4: 5: _ 6: _ 7: _ 8: R:- 12. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Are you aware of any special considerations that apply to either the impact site(s) or the replacement site(s)'.' ❑ Yes ❑ No (Examples: the presence of endangered species, special fish and wildlife resources, sensitive surface waters, or waste disposal site.) If YES, list and describe briefly. 13. SHORELAND IMPACT ZONE: Please identify each wetland impact site noted in Section 15 that is within 1000 feet of a lake or 300 feet of a river. Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects Page 3 14. HOW PROPOSED REPLACEMENT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED: Indicate how proposed replacement will be accomplished (check only one lox below and continue as indicated): ❑ A. Wetland baWdng only Complete Application for Withdrawal ofWedand Credits Form and include with your application. Copies of this form are available Som your LGU, or download a copy from www.bwsr.stae.mn.us Skip to Section 19, page 6 (You do not need to complete Sections 15-18). OB. Project -specific replacement only Continue with Section 15 below. ❑ C. A Combination of wetland banking and project -specific replacement Complete Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits Form and include with your application. Copies of this form are available from your LGU, or download a copy from www.bwsr.siate.maus Continue with Section 15 below. 15. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND(S) CONSTRUCTION (Complete this section only if you marked Box B or Box C in Section 14 above): Describe in detail bow replacement wetlands) will be constructed If several methods will be used, describe each methal. Details should include the following: 1) type of construction (such as excavated in upland, restored by the break restored by ditch block or revegerated); 2) type, size and specifications of outlet structures; 3) elevations relative to Mean Sea Level or established benchmarks or key features (such as sill, emergency overflow or structure height); 4) what best management practices will be implemented to prevent erosions or sim degradation; 5) proposed timetable for starting and ending the project; and 6) a vegetation management plan. Write this description on a separate sheet of papa labeled DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND CONSTRUCTION. see attached narrative 16. SURPLUS WETLAND CREDITS: If using project -specific replacement (Box B or Box C in Section 14 above), will the replacement result in any surplus wetland credits that you wish to have deposited in the State Wetland Bank for future use? ❑ Yes ® No. If yes, submit a Weiland Banking Application directly to your LGU. Copies are available from your LGU, or download a copy from www.bwsr.stste.mn.us 17. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLANDS: Complete the cbsrt below: 1) Use one row of boxes for each wetland replacement site; 2) If your project has more that one wetland replacement site, reference your overhead view (part of Section 5) in this chart by identifying and labeling "first replacement site'and "second replacement site" on your overhead view; 3) If you are identifying only one wetland type within a given replacement site, use the first dotted line(s) and leave the others blank 4) If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type in a given replacement she, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each separate wetland type, and identify type(s) of replacement credits and'7estored or created" for each separate wedsod type with that replacement site; 5) If you do not have access to some of the information, in if you do not know your replacement ratio, can your LGU or SWCD office for assistance. Photocopy chartfor more wedand replacements, ifneeded.) IIFRCRIPTION nF RFPI. ACEMENT WETLANDS Identify Watershed County Section, Wetland Type(s) of replacement credits Restored Wetland name or Township, Type' (in acres or square feet) or replacement number created? site (if known) Range New Wetland Public Value Indicate (as noted on Credits (NWC) Credits (PVC) R or C overhead view) Name of 20055 Carver 9,116,23 112 31,650 sq.fL 28,416 sq.ft, C First ------ --------------------------------------- ------- ----- replacement -- ---------- site----------- ---------------------- --------------------- Name of Second----------- -------------------- ----------------------- ------------- replacement site----------- --------------------- 'Circular 39 wetland types: Indicatel, 11., 2,3,4,5,6,7,8, 1 , or U. If you are 31,650 sq. ft. 28,416 sq. ft. identifying only one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the first TOTAL NwC TOTAL PVC dotted line and leave the others blank. If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the extra dotted lines m indicate REQUIRED REPLACEMENT RATIO: each separate wetland type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted area for each separate wetland type within that impact area. afbiown) 2.1 Minnesota Local/State/Fedend Application Forms fm Water/Wetland Projects Page 4 —�-04/29/2084 15`36 65166194SE PIONEER ENG PAGE b4/N4 I& ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PROJELT•9PECIPIC 11SPLACEMENT (Required only If you marked Bos B cr Dos Cin Sectiaa 14): Far PMj4M InvalNng at Inst WIN PMjs et-9pedfle roplMemeot, include the following additional m otmruom ® Two drawie p to tole ofeia mplacornmt wrJand. Include both overhead vie,t and Profile (tide view ore a+•reed owl view). Sao 11%.1 m Include on Plan. flnmlicdom, Pape 3) foe a detailed description afwhm should be incledcd in these dnwings. Without drawings, yon, appfiaatioe, will be considered Incannithist. ® For created replacement wetlands, include additiaeul anl. informmtloa (if awilable) dhat ndieato the capability of the she to Produce and maim wol-Ad chanclotiedcr. Notal; For replacemetrt wetuatls located on pipeline eaaansav, you rnadto receive cwdMetmem*fyour prgicat Rnm"the wsamerH halderad the Mirmcwts Deysntrmm. of Public Safety's Office of Pipeline Safety. Blore rhos nfmmnctIm the o,,er.rwy mllhfar must benobfied. The lmdowno or eoneaewr is reap.uible for giving ship nonce by calling "Gook. State One-f41I at652-d54-M2 avl- Cldec Man, Ara) or I -MO -252-1166 (all other loeatnne). Nnte 2: For Ctenaiw or eampler pmj cess ruppkmentary, information ffgy be requested ata lac dated from vas or more of the responding 119"sfcS. Such mfmmadnn may include (but net 6e l0rde d to) the following: tepegmphie map, water table mate. oil borinpn, depth rohhndinp. neriol PhotaMpba. aninwhmenul asrdtmeat and/or mipmeeneg reports, 19. SIGNED AFFIRMATION: MR PROJECTS INVOLVING REPLACEMENT BY WETLAND BANKING ONLY, To the baa of my knowledlt and bcbd, oil infonrtarian m Tart TI is pec cotnplae and aoapmne; sod 1 affirm duet the wcdand losses will M replaced vin withdrawal from an account in the Swe Wedad Bank. FOR PROJECTS INVOLVING ErTHER PRONCT.BPECIFIC REPLACEMENT ONLY OR A COMBINATION OF WETLAND BANKTNG AND PRO.IF,CT-SPECMC RBPLACRMENT: Part A: The repuceaeet wothind. 1 sfRrm Nn Ne rep).xcmmt wetemd was nnL Previously cnatored or vmlcd undts a prior approved replacernegn plan or psemiL AND OrahiedW filled under an annptbn during the previous 10 ycara: AND Resigned whh Menial assi.pe t" Dom pubHe conservation props, ; AND RoWtd mnng priwm (ends, other than li ndownerfund9. unless tbcfwds we paid back with interest to the indivfdal ororlool.ndon that ended the mstmasion; and d- i divNal or Migituativn netifioi the least govemnen:mir in wtiekha once tae recanted wetland may bo eanstdaed fir mplacenem, Pan B: Additional mmraneve(chak all that apply): ® The wnhnd will be mplaced befnm or 000ctvrest widr the actual draining m filling of a -Wwd. ❑ An inevocable bank letter of cradit, performance bond. a other occ ptabk ace silky has been provided to guanmm successful completion of the wodwd replacement. ❑ The -croad losses will be replaced via withdrawal fihmhth an mecum m the Sure Wetland Bank. PWC. For projega bPwlda gany pi ndetrypedfit feplaeement: Widiin JO days of eitber r¢eiving sppmwl of this a"Lention or bepwing work an theprnjeni, I will moerd The Deelsmdon efRamrclices and Covmanu an the doed for tae property oo wldah the rePlaremeat weU W d(a) well be 1,catee, and I will a: the pave tine mhmir proof eCaab r¢ordwR m de 1.0U. Te aha awl ofug lmnwhslge and belie[ all )pfottadea in Part 0 ie sue, cpmplate std insures; and l atTpm all sutame let in Put A and C, as well at ebeeka�japuranee(a) in Pat B. Sig nae er oppficorttgrapgr J, n , \ ,� -/ Deft FOR LGL USE ONLY RePlacrment plan la (chink ons): ❑ APPmvod MAppmved with enMklnns (conditions amched) ❑ L"ed LGV q#tna1 sfgneane Dom LGU has "chive seldomft or tide and Proof of recording of DmLmtim of Rwtricdm: and Covenants for Replaotmem Wetland: Ccun(v whin: mwed Dare Docamant b assigned oy recorder LCV gBiohrl rifinawrt Dace viimxsou L cSl/ Sute?eileasl Appaiaritm toner for Water/W gland Prpjcm p.ge 5 Wetland Replacement Plan Wetland Conservation Act Westwood Community Church Chanhassen, Minnesota April 27, 2004 Introduction and Background In May 1997, Svoboda Ecological Resources, Inc. completed the delineation of two wetlands on the subject property located in the NW Y4 SW'/4 of Section 9 and the NE Y4 SE Y4 Section 8, T1 16N, R23W, Carver County. A copy of the wetland delineation report is included in Appendix A. The delineation was reviewed in May 2001 by Svoboda, and the boundaries were determined to be in similar locations as the 1997 delineation. The site is bounded by Trunk Highway 41 to the east, Tanadoona Drive to the north and undeveloped land to the south and west (Figure 1). The location of the impact and replacement areas on the site are shown on Exhibit 1. The topography is rolling according to the U.S.G.S. Shakopee Quadrangle and National Wetland Inventory wetlands and hydric soils are shown on Figures 2 and 3. The Westwood Church project includes a parking lot expansion of 134 stalls and an additional access drive at the request of the City of Chanhassen. On -Site Wetlands Wetland 1 is a partially wooded wetland with a reed canarygrass-filled meadow in the northern portion. It is located in the south-central portion of the site on the southern property boundary. No basins were designated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as Protected Wetlands. Lake Minnewashta is located one-half mile to the west of the site. Detailed information regarding each wetland's type, vegetation composition, soils and hydrology can be found in the wetland delineation report in Appendix A. WCA Replacement Plan Application Westwood Community Church April 27, 2004 Page 2 Project Need and Purpose The purpose of the project is to provide additional parking for a church with an expanding congregation in the rapidly growing southwest surburban area of the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The site is guided by the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the current site use. It is located in close proximity to the developed portions of the City of Chanhassen, Excelsior, Chaska and Victoria. Proposed Impacts One wetland impact is proposed. This impact is proposed strictly for construction of a public street (78th Street extension) across the southern perimeter of the project. This impact totals 30,033 square feet. The wetland impact areas are shown on the attached Grading Plan (Exhibit 2). Sequencing Avoidance and Minimization The "no -build" alternative would avoid wetland impacts. However, as the congregation of Westwood Church has grown, parking needs have exceeded current capacity of the parking lot. Subsequently, parked vehicles will overflow into nearby streets, including Tannadoona Drive and Trunk Highway 41 impeding circulation and posing a safety hazard to a regional highway. The City of Chanhassen has requested that the parking lots have a second access due to capacity and emergency access concerns. A "no -impact" alternative would not provide a second public or private right-of- way access to the church since there is no other location available for a second access route. The City of Chanhassen has requested a second access to the site due to the safety concerns cited above. Currently, traffic control officers are needed during church services due to the congestion on Tannadoona Drive and Trunk Highway 41. No other alternatives are available to provide access to Trunk Highway 41 since the church property is landlocked by the parcels owned by others to the east and south. The only existing access is from Tannadoona Drive. A second access on to Tannadoona Drive will not solve the congestion problems since all traffic will still be funneled onto Tannadoona Drive. A previous alternative was generated that provided access to the site via a private driveway in the location of the 78th Street extension included in this proposal. This alternative had fewer wetland impacts due to the reduced width of the private roadway compared to a public street. However, the City of Chanhassen intends to provide a public right-of-way along the southern perimeter of the site by extending West 78th Street to the west from Trunk Highway 41 toward Lake Minnewashta. This street will service other properties WCA Replacement Plan Application Westwood Community Church April 27, 2004 Page 3 to the west of the church site, and a private roadway will not adequately serve these other properties. The public street width was kept to the minimum safe width within the right-of- way. Side slopes were maximized at 3:1 slopes. Portions of the wetland that would be impacted are vegetated with reed canarygrass which is indicative of some disturbance. The New Wetland Credit area proposed to replace this basin will be planted with native sedge meadow species. Alternative Sites Alternative sites for the proposed project were not explored in depth since this site will accomplish the project purpose with minimal wetland impact. Further, this site is guided for the proposed use and if this expansion is not implemented, another church site may ultimately be needed, possibly resulting in greater wetland impacts elsewhere. Rectification of Impact No temporary wetland impacts are proposed which could be rectified after project completion. Reduction or Elimination of Impacts Over Time Standard best management practices will be used which will reduce the impact to the wetlands through erosion control measures. Replacement of Unavoidable Impacts The unavoidable wetland impact of 30,033 square feet will be replaced through the implementation of the compensatory mitigation plan outlined below. Compensatory Mitigation Plan The Wetland Conservation Act requires replacement of drained or filled wetlands at a minimum ratio of 2:1 for the 30,033 square feet of proposed impacts. New Wetland Credit (NWC) of 31,650 (0.73 acres) is proposed for the site. The NWC area is proposed to be a Type 2 fresh meadow. The NWC areas are in an area mapped as Hamel loam according to the Carver County Soil Survey (see Figure 2 in Wetland Delineation Report — Appendix A). Initial investigations indicated that the soils at the proposed NWC area have soils with characteristics indicative of this soil type. The Hamel loam is listed as a poorly drained soil. The NWC area would be excavated to a finished bottom elevation of 981.0' with an undulating bottom not exceeding 982.0' in the New Wetland Credit area. The hydrology source of the mitigation wetland will be surface and ground water as it is in the existing Wetland 1 and treated stormwater from the proposed stormwater pond. WCA Replacement Plan Application Westwood Community Church April 27, 2004 Page 4 The plan proposed should produce a saturated palustrine emergent (Type 2 inland fresh meadow) wetlands. The created wetland area will be seeded with the wet meadow mix and at the rates described on the Grading Plan (Exhibits 2 and 3). PVC is also being generated by constructing one storm water basin on the site. The storm water basin is proposed to be adjacent to wetland 1 (see Exhibit 2). The pond measures 14,500 square feet (0.33 acre) at the Normal Water Level (NWL). As allowed under Minnesota Rules 8420.0541 Subp. 10 (13)(1), up to 100 percent of the NWL area is eligible for PVC. In addition, the original 2001 site plan for the church proposed 6,612 square feet of wetland impact that was mitigated by creation of 7,280 square feet of NWC and 5,944 square feet of Public Value Credit from stormwater ponds. The 2001 plan also included 49,820 square feet of stormwater ponds. Once the PVC portion (5,944 sq.ft.) for the 2001 wetland impact is deducted, there remains 43,873 square feet of unclaimed PVC for the stormwater pond constructed in 2001. This application proposes to use 13,916 square feet of the remaining stormwater pond area from the 2001 application as PVC. The applicant is establishing a 20 -foot wide native prairie buffer around most of the perimeter of New Wetland Credit Area (see Figure 3) not included in this application for PVC. This buffer area will be planted in accordance with the native prairie seeding specifications outlined in Appendix B. The total replacement wetland credit area for this project will be 1.38 acre (0.73 acre of NWC and 0.65 acre of stormwater ponds -see below). In addition, the NWC area and the buffer area will be planted with the native prairie seeding after final site grading is completed. WCA Replacement Plan Application Westwood Community Church April 27, 2004 Page 5 The total eligible wetland mitigation credits being generated are outlined in the table below. Table 1. WCA Wetland Credits — Westwood Church Mitigation Area Mitigation Type Acreage Used By Project To Be Banked East of Wetland 1 NWC 0.73 acre 0.73 acre 0.0 acre Stormwater pond 1 PVC 0.33 acre 0.33 acre 0.0 acre Stormwater pond 2 from 2001 application) PVC 0.32 acre 0.32 acre 0.0 acre TOTAL 1.38 acres 1.38 acres 0 acres Monitoring The mitigation monitoring requirements outlined in the Wetland Conservation Act will be followed. These requirements (per Minn. Rule 8420.0620) are as follows: 1) Description of the project location, size, current wetland type (Cowardin classification), and desired wetland type (goal). 2) A comparison of the as -built specifications versus the design specifications (first annual monitoring report only) and a rationale for significant changes. 3) Hydrology measurements: seasonal water level elevations or areal coverage measurements during the period April through October. 4) A map of plant communities within the boundaries of the replacement site, including hydrologic indicators observed. 5) Color photographs of the project area taken any time during the growing season. Annual mitigation monitoring reports will be submitted to the City of Chanhassen as required in its replacement plan approval. WmwdCarr,.o,¢yG"or aaz, M"mm R0LmnmtA=Apfiha&= MONITORING PLAN The applicant agrees to monitor wetland mitigation areas as per the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act rule 8420.0600. Monitoring shall last for a period of five years following completion of the wetland replacement project, or until the Technical Evaluation Panel deems the replacement wetland to be fully functional. Monitoring reports will be completed annually by December 31 of each year, and submitted to Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District (the LGU for WCA), City of Chanhassen, BWSR, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The report will describe actual wetland restoration or creation activities completed during the past year, activities planned for the upcoming year, and information specified below: • A description of the project location, size, current wetland type (Cowardn classification), and desired wetland type (goal) • A comparison of the as -built specifications versus the design specifications (fust annual plan only), and a rationale for significant changes • Hydrology measurements: at least three seasonal water level elevations during the period April through October (mean sea level or referenced to a known bench mark) • A list of the dominant vegetation in the wetland, including common names of the vegetation exceeding 20 percent coverage and a estimate of coverage, for example, 50 percent willow, 20 percent cattail, and 30 percent sedge; and • Color photographs of the project areas taken anytime during the period June through August • Wildlife observed • Management problems and recommended corrective actions MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR NEW WETLAND CREDIT AREAS AND BUFFER AREAS VEGETATION ESTABLISHIv1ENT Once the basin has been excavated, the seeding surface will be prepared in accordance with the MnDOT Seeding Manual 2000. A cover crop will be seeded to provide temporary cover for the establishment of permanent native species, and to provide erosion control for recently graded areas. Acceptable species for the cover crop include annual rye or oats, or ReGreen. The site will also be seeded with MnDOT seed mix 25B (modified 25A) for prairie meadows and streambanks at a rate of 30 lbs. of pure live seed per acre on all disturbed soils within the wetland and buffer areas. Species requiring cold stratification or scarification should be pre-treated prior to seeding. Enclosed are additional specifications from the MnDOT Seeding Manual 2000. Once native species have germinated, maintenance activities will begin. The site shall be maintained as outlined within the MnDOT Seeding Manual 2000 with respect to exotic species control, mowing and weeding. In addition to on-going maintenance activities, yearly monitoring will be provided. The conditions of the annual monitoring are provided in the attached Monitoring Plan. A perpetual easement is required for the New Wetland Credit areas and Public Value Credit (buffer) area banking. The attached Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) Form A Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetlands is attached Upland buffer monuments are recommended, as are conservation easement signs. If monuments are installed, a registered land surveyor should be consulted to locate these boundaries and prepare a legal description. If you have questions regarding this application, please call me. Sincerely, Pioneer Engineering, P.A. William J. Bleckwenn, RLA Landscape Architect 7:41 /1 .a — 1/j/nlrf % .::/ / ilii/// <ff If \1 It \a \ \ 111111 1 \ \ 6Er s/r 1 \ \ 111111 \ \ � � • / / - _� / / \ +\ .` . ` � • I}/yam'-'` ` , , , ___-- �'� = -'`` •�--��� ��_ �I' \<� \��_ _��_�_ , \ { Ill 1111 I11f1 ! / , \�'1 ����_-+�`. ��`����_�` __;�+11 11 1l llllllllllll Il/f • \\� \�. \IIII I \ 1 \ \ \ 1 ! / / f I \ .��\ / ,- �/ I \\ ♦ `\\Q\\ \\\+1\ \ 1 / _ fi If ff //1111 �,�ii//�/jll I,� G/� �i���i�ii �/i /ice,'•//ter ,l\! � !'!''i//,/j.// f f✓,////i///7/a I / jllllili/� 7i/ it to /// IJIt if 1 illi l f f/fit i. /\ N. / * PIONEER engineering PA 2422 EMIII a Drive U"doto Heots" NN 55120 681-1914 1Nn�RI�aEiR.�u,EflJDE Mo)IEM13 6p257�1-& N,gI 10 N E C.:. 1 \ ifi:/ 771 ✓ii% 1 �-s '- _ / // / IMPACT AND REPLACEMENT AREA SEE EXHIBIT 2 h it 104049 -WETLAND MIT EXHISIT.DWG \\ ♦♦ �\ \♦ \ `1 \♦ 1 1 1/ I //`�♦ I t♦•:".': ' !!// �3 i' r• '. .'.� ♦°,v se -e so °°vv°v _ — , 1 , � — ' /rr '// //• ,i.•• '•tI _ vvevov vPv°°o v / ,' NEW WETbkNU CREDIT ' :•�.'' - _ - -" 31 65Q SF.":i/!''/i/� GRADE-UNQULATINGBOTT /. /fi// \. j' ' !'P� e - !• t --$ETWEEN- 98881:CF"TO-982-.J :i�' /,' t'•'' r ... %/,f^t� SEED WITH IJINQQt btlX/�� / :,:: :::::::.;% /// ft �. .'.•.1.'.•,. :, :: J.... l ! i:: / :r�•vvvvv WITH WET F_QRBS. ;:l , ,.. -'��/ 1 y i 1 t t 1 1 y I I I 1 1 / i' / I ' /! / 'r l •'t'•'•'\7. / EXISTING NEW WE ! ' t.:'' :iS? ::}: ✓r: r::::: ':: o° ° _ _ CREDIT AREA Tk, AIN r..'.a• T 1 .. °/ - !! / '.' ,f // ,'/'' \I •,'••'P. 20' 5J..� Y { EXISTING' 6 BUFFER 1 I , 1 ;,;.;.'1 \, 1 r , / ! �i TO QE COND TO NEW . 1 1. :r / 3:T WETLANV/ DIT AREA. 1 t i / r// //r // / ' / / // / . 2'' f..::I 1 1 p/ I �r .' , / / / , / / / f f 1 / / / r / / / / . // / �- I • \'•' { y { r t 74 fj : , , Ct103J ArA :r o 1 t r / lo!LE-! . �,� / / / / / / // i / / / 1 a' ' / , / , I ;r •'1'.j...:.......t.................}:::. / lie! , I I I / / f -t:::: i::r:i:i?=:......... e I I d �v ',f / -'' � 'i ! ' / / / ,' � / / / / 't•' 1 / S/ '9 5:i;; : t..... t:::: I r / N�,/' NY�IILAPtDI< BId�FEfL 'moi / , , / / �♦ \ T 1 �'\_:i t 't.: .:r- rZ t 1 . ...Y.... ° /✓� �',/ �(',/� / / /' i / i ' ,/ WETfAND FILL t"i.'(iG(:.°. 1 ,/ 30x033 SF , \ ! ! . r +::..1'. r / ,� ,/ � / / � � 1 y,•. 1 r 1 I , t \ 1 -.F {:: .t r' ab I \ \ l , , I I 1 1 r 1 I , / / !' / , / , / / r 1 ,r•. r , 1 / 1 1 1 r \ . _ v> ' ° 1 I , 1 \ \ 1 I 1 1 , 1 1 / / °ao 1 \ 1 t, a o° v F° o , � 1 <oo°o ao° y �° ° °° v ... ....... ........ ............................... ... ... ...... ... ...... ... ..... ' .......' ....... ... ...... .. I. ................... .A . .. . ... .. ... ... .... ...I.. ... .. .. ..f .. I. I 6 i 0 y / 1 1 -ET ml', , I, * PIONEER 1 ' 104049—WETLAND MIT E%HIBIT.DWG engineering PA 2422 Enterprise Drive rprisehdoto Date a-3o-oa PROJECT *JK uHeights. UN 55120 (612 Designed CAS WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH - WETLAND MITIGATION EXHIBIT 2 � Hh 625rHghw%10NAE68t-9488 1612 783--5880 EA%.]83-1987 Drawn PC 1000 ..E Mb DATUM ELEV 970.00 0+00 0+25 * PIONEER en ineerin PA 2422 E tl nse Drive Mendota Heights. WN 55120 681-1 661-9. urp "He.RS. 1/!"sVK rnpn[cts�622) 10 NAE NEY WE NDC EDIT NEW WETLAND BUFFEiX I / XISTiN W,ETLAIND EXI TING TLA D BU R / TO E CO VERTED 10 NEW WE ND REDI . / h GR DE U 4DULA NG B TTOM 0+00 0+25 * PIONEER en ineerin PA 2422 E tl nse Drive Mendota Heights. WN 55120 681-1 661-9. urp "He.RS. 1/!"sVK rnpn[cts�622) 10 NAE 0+50 0+75 1+00 1+25 1+50 1+75 SECTION A -A 1000 2+00 2+25 ..I •:• SCALE: 1" = 25' HORIZ. 1" = 5' VERT. 104049—WETLAND MIT E%HIBIT.DWG 0 500 1,000 2.000 3,000 Feet Legend Shakopee_3730_NWI_Wetlands * PIONEER engineering ** *-* 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet Legend Carver—Hydric—Soils ** * PIONEER * engineering *4L 14 m SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES Providing the Sharper Edge in Natural Resources & Environmental Consulting une 12, 2001 Mr. Steve Lartu Westwood Community Church 7801 Park Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: SER Project Name: Westwood Community Church SER Project No: 2001-043-03 Project Location: A portion of the NEI/4 of the SEI/4 of Section 8, T. I I6N, R. 23W, City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota Project Description: Wetland Classification, Identification, Delineation and Staking Services Report Amendment Dear Mr. Lattu, As requested, Svobada Ecological Resources (SER) visited the above referenced property on May 9, 2001, to reexamine the site for the presence of areas meeting wetland criteria. Criteria for determining jurisdictional wetlands are as described in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987 Manual) as required by the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Per Mr. Lattu's request, SER visited the site to restake the subject property wetlands that Were originally delineated in May 1997. The findings from the 1997 wetland delineation are presented in the report titled Dogwood Road Site Wetland Classification, Identficarion, and Delineation with a May 30;,1997 date. This letter reportis presented as an amendment to the original report and is to be used in conjunction to the 1997 wetland delineation report. SER restaked Basins 1 and 2 following the same methodology as presented in the 1997 report. The basin boundaries are similar to those staked in 1997 and therefore SER recommends that the 1997 report be referred to for detailed information regarding wetland data. SER appreciates the opportunity to provide our services on your project Please feel free to contact us at (952) 471-1100 if you have any comments or questions regarding this amendment to the 1997 wctland delineation report Sincerely, Svoboda Ecological Resources d. Franklin J. Svoboda, CWB, PWS Vice -President Enclosures Cc: Jim Tiggelaar, Project Engineer, Hammel Green and Abrahamson Engineering SER project files 2477 Shadywood Road Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 471-1100 (Office) (952) 411-0007 (Fax) VY/10/ VY 1J. YJ 3A6 � Vlil V• VUNrur•.r.ri.a. CITY OF CITY OF CHANHASSEN CHMSEN FAX COVER LETTER 63"GiwrDrk PO Box 147 Ckan6awxMinneaw55317 Fax Number: (952) 937-5739 Pbnne 612937.1300 Genoal Fes 612937.5739 EnguurrrngFa=6129379152 Date: Pu6ke Safety Far 612.934.2524 WebWwMa.chanh en?nAm Company: F6} CA welly Attention: Ji *% Tawe I�dr ! GIL/�32-9n�3 Fax Number: Sent By: Loy-; 41OLL Extension: /IDS Sending a total of 2- pages, including this cover page. Wr Please find the information you requested ❑ Please review and call me ❑ Please call to confirm receipt of this fax L If you do not receive all pages, or are experiencing other problems in transmission, please call 937-1900 and ask for operator assistance. 9eLl x v opo �. X � ggp ` 4 ti Q �0h / X 9.7 SWIW UNE OF Ile /OF IL SOUL WMT / J I� I OMMER: UNIVERSTY OF MINNESO X IMS X 9791 I n 9 OBOD I'rauidin£ the Sharper Iltu in Natural Et, ves &Eruviron%eatal CorysultioK EL®Gi�1L RES�DURCES Wetland Classification, Identification, and Delineation Report Prepared for: Builders Development, Inc. by: Svoboda Ecological Resources Project Number 97-058 May 30, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY.................................................................1 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES .......................................... 1 STUDYMETHODS..........................................................2 RESULTS........:..........................................................3 OffsiteSurvey..........................................................3 Field Conditions.........................................................3 Field Delineation........................................................4 DISCUSSION................................................................7 RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................... 8 DATAS OURCES............................................................9 LITERATURE CITED ........................................................ 9 CERTIFICATION...........................................................11 FIGURES 1. National Wetlands Inventory Map 2. County Soil Survey - 3. DNR Protected Waters Map 4. Precipitation Data 5. Aerial Photo of Site 6. Photo Log SUMMARY Svoboda Ecological Resources (SER) performed a wetland delineation on a property on Dogwood Road in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota on May 21 and 27, 1997. Two wetland basins were identified and delineated, and three other areas were investigated, but were found not to be wetlands. The wetlands were delineated and classified according to appropriate state and federal methods and are subject to regulation at local, state, and federal levels. INTRODUCTION ANIS OBJECTIVES The subject property lies east of Dogwood Road and south of Tanadoona Drive in the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. It occupies the NE'/. SEY< Section 8, Towmship I I6N, Range 23W, and the NW'/. SWIA Section 9, Township 116N, Range 23W, Carver County, Minnesota. The parcel is surrounded by residential, wooded, and agricultural lands. At the time of the visit the majority of the property was recently tilled farmland, with deciduous upland forest at the west end, and a drainage ditch in the southeast portion. The Type 4 (PEMHx) drainage ditch ran through a Type 2 (PEMMd) wetland area into a forested Type I (PFO IC) wetland along the southern boundary of the property. Another forested Type 1 (PF01 C) wetland was located in the forested area at the west end of the parcel. Three other areas were investigated during the field visits, including a basin identified on the NWI maps as a PEMAd wetland, but all were found to not have the necessary criteria to be considered wetlands. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of wetland boundaries present within the subject property boundaries. Wetlands were also to be classified using both the Cowardin and Circular 39 classification systems. Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-058 1 Builders Development, Inc STUDY METHODS Prior to conducting the site visit, SER staff consulted NWI maps, Carver County Soils maps, aerial photographs, and MNDNR Protected Waters Maps to identify potential freshwater wetland habitats. Areas demonstrating evidence of wetland conditions were evaluated in greater detail during the field surveys. Vegetation, soils, and hydrology were examined during the field surveys, as outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (hereafter, "1987 Manual") (Environmental Laboratory, 1987). These three criteria were used to characterize and determine the extent of wetlands, and to determine the location of their boundaries. Wetland edges were marked with sequentially numbered 4 -foot lath and flagged with orange surveyor's tape imprinted with the words, "Wetland Boundary". The wetland edge was considered the highest extent of the wetland basin. Thus areas below the edge met required wetland criteria, while areas above the edge did not. Sample transects were established in representative wetland to upland transition zones. Each transect included two sample points located along a line running perpendicular to the wetland edge, one point being in the wetland, and the other in the adjacent upland. Each sample point was marked with 4 -foot lath marked with an identifying number and an indicator as to whether it was a wetland or upland sample point. The lath were also flagged with orange and black diagonally striped surveyor's flagging tape. to distinguish them from wetland boundary markers. A Routine Determination Form was completed at each sample point (Appendix A). Wetland classification followed methods described in Cowardin, et. al. (1979) and used in the NWI (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). The Circular 39 classification (Shaw and Fredine 1956) was also determined in compliance with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-058 2 Builders Development, Inc Soil colors were determined using a Munsell Soil Color Chart and vegetation was identified using suitable keys (Gleason and Cronquist 1991, Newcomb 1977). Hydrophytic status of plants was determined using the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Minnesota (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1988). RESULTS OFFSITE SURVEY The NWI maps for the site (Shakopee Quadrangle) showed one PEMAd basin j ust west of the center of the parcel, and a large PEMAd basin with PEMCd and PFO1Cd inclusions in the southeast portion of the site (see Figure 1). This indicated Palustrine (P-), Emergent (-EM-) and Forested (-FO1-), Temporarily flooded but partially drained (-Ad), and Seasonally flooded but partially drained or ditched (-Cd) wetlands. The Soil Survey of Carver County, Minnesota, Sheet Number 19, (SCS 1968) indicated five different soil series on the subject parcel (see Figure 2). Of these, Glencoe silty clay loam was classified as a hydric soil in Hydric Soils of the United States (NTCHS, 1991). Peat and muck soils are considered organic soils, which are all considered hydric by the 1987 Manual. The areas identified as wetland on the NWI map corresponded to some of the areas classified as hydric soils. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Protected Waters Map of Carver County did not indicate any protected waters on the site (see Figure 3). FIELD CONDITIONS The delineations of the wetlands on the site took place on May 21 and 27, 1997. Precipitation data Svoboda Ecological Resources Doo,,Aood Road Site Project No. 97-058 Builders Development, Inc for this year (1997) was unavailable at the time this report was prepared, so predictions of groundwater level were made based on long-term data. The long-term precipitation data (see Figure 4) show above-average rainfall for three of the last four Years at the National Weather Service station located in Chaska, Carver County, Minnesota. Temperatures averaged 56° F the week of the delineation, and the precipitation - a total of 0.4" for the week - was about 0.41" below average. Given this data, hydrology is expected to be fairly normal to below normal for existing wetlands in the area. FIELD DELINEATION The following text describes the wetlands identified on the site and the basis for determining the wetland boundary. Refer to Figure 5 for the locations of the wetlands and the sample points. Completed Routine Determination Forms can be found in Appendix A. The wetland areas on the site were comprised of a mixture of several wetland types as described below. Wetland 1 was a mixture of forested Type 1 (PFO IC), and reed -canary grass dominated Type 2 (PEMBd) basins, with a Type 4 (PEMHx) excavated -ditch conning through both. The wetland area was mapped on the NWI map as PEMAd, PEMCd, and PFO1Cd, and corresponded to an area mapped by the SCS as Peat/Muck and Glencoe silty clay loam, both hydric soils (see Figures I and 2). Dominant plant species in the wetland included reed -canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) (FACW+), box elder (Acer negundo) (FACW-), jewelweed (Impatiens capensis) (FACW), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) (FAC--), and Jack in the pulpit (Arisaema triphyllum) (FACW-). Non-dominant plant species included elderberry (Sambucus canadensis) (FACW-), and black willow (Salix nigra) (OBL). Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-058 4 Builders Development, Inc The soils at the first sample point (SP 1), located in the forested portion at the southeast side of the wetland, were olive -black 2.5Y 2.5/1 hemic peat to a depth of fourteen inches. This overlayed a IOYR 2/1 clay loam with common, medium, distinct 7.5YR 3/4 mottles and a few tiny fragments of undecaved organic material (leaves, roots). Free water was measured in the borehole at thirteen inches from the surface. Upland soils at this sample transect were 2.5Y 3/1 clay loam with many small, diffuse 2.5Y 3/2 mottles and redox concentrations on ped faces to a depth of twelve inches. Free water in the borehole was measured at thirty-two inches from the surface. The wetland boundary around the forested portion at the south end of the wetland was flagged based on the change in surface soils from organic to mineral, the change in vegetation from wetland to upland, and a noticeable topographic change. The wetland edge around the ditch at the north end of the wetland was identified as the edge of the ditch, as the side -cast fill from the ditch created a steep slope on either side of the ditch that did not support any hydrophytic vegetation, and the water level in the ditch was in excess of twelve inches from the top of the bank. Soil sampling immediately adjacent to the ditch would have been meaningless due to the placement of the side -cast fill. A second sample transect (SPIA) was established to determine the wetland edge in the area dominated by reed -canary grass. The vegetation throughout this area was entirely reed -canary grass, With a few young box elder trees scattered close to the forested area of the wetland. The soils were 2.5 YR 2.5/1 peaty muck to a depth of ten inches, over a I OYR 3/1 clay, with no visible features. Free water was measured in the borehole at ten inches from the surface. Seven feet away, on the upland side of the sample point, the soils were 2.5Y 3/1 silty clay loam to a depth of twelve inches with free water in the borehole at twenty-two inches from the surface. The edge of the wetland around the reed -canary grass area was determined by the change in depth Of free water in the borehole and a change in topography from smooth contour in the upland to an area of hummocks in the wetland. The entire wetland was flagged to the southern property Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-058 5 Builders Development, Inc boundary, where the NWI map indicated the wetland continued onto the adjacent property. Wetland 2 was a forested Type 1 (PFO1 A) basin located in the forested portion of the west end of the parcel. The vegetation was dominated by American elm (Ulmus americana) (FACW-) and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanicum) (FACW), with an understory of larger straw sedge (Carex normalis) (FACW) and Jack-in-the-pulpit. Adjacent upland forest species were dominated by sugar maple (.Acer saccharum) (FACU), and included American elm and basswood (Tilia americana) (FACW-), with Jack -in-the-pulpit in the understory. Although this area was not identified on the NWI maps, and the soils for this location were identified as Lester loam, a non -hydric soil, the site met the three criteria for designation as a jurisdictional wetland. The soils in the -wetland sample point for this basin were four inches of organic material overjet black N/2.5 clay loam to a depth of six inches. Below the clay loam was jet black N/2.5 clay to a depth of forty inches. Based on this information, the soils of Wetland 2 are likely a hydric soil inclusion within the area of Lester loam that appears on the Carver County Soil Survey. Water stained leaves were observed on the surface, suggesting wetland hydrology, and free water in the borehole was measured at twenty-six inches from the surface. The heavy clay soils may have prevented free water from percolating higher at a clearly observable rate. The edge of Wetland 2 was marked based on the change in dominant vegetation from sugar maples in the upland to American elm and green ash in the wetland Area A, located in the northwestern portion of the property, on or near the property boundary, included an excavated ditch approximately four feet wide and sixty feet long, dominated by reed - canary grass. The soils in the ditch were IOYR 3/2 silt loam with faint 10YR 4/2 mottles and distinct 7.5YR 5/6 mottles to a depth of seven inches. Beneath this was N/2.5 clay loam with few, Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-058 6 Builders Development, Inc distinct, small 15YR 5/6 mottles to a depth of twenty-four inches, and 10YR 5/1 clay with common, distinct, medium 2.5YR 5/6 mottles to the bottom of the thirty-one inch borehole. Free water in the borehole was measured at twenty-seven inches from the surface. Although the ditch met the three wetland criteria, it should not be considered ajurisdictional wetland because it is a ditch created and maintained for agricultural drainage. The ditch has been maintained within the past five years as was evident from the lack of any woody vegetation developing in the ditch, and the side -cast spoil without any significant vegetation on it. Area A was flagged with orange and black diagonally striped surveyor's flagging tape to identify the area, however based on the field investigation of the site, SER does not consider Area A to be a wetland. An area identified on the NWI maps as a PENLAd basin west of the center of the parcel was also investigated. This area corresponded to an area mapped as Glencoe silty clay loam (a hydric soil) on the Carver County Soil Survey. It was found to have no evidence of hydrophytic vegetation and no evidence of wetland hydrology, however, so it can not be identified as a wetland. DISCUSSION The wetland basins identified and delineated during the site visit meet the criteria of jurisdictional wetlands in the 1987 Manual. Therefore development activity that impacts or potentially impacts these wetlands is regulated under federal, state, and local law. Wetland 1 is at one of the lowest topographic points on the subject parcel. It is possible that the wetland covered a larger area at one time, but the ditch excavated down the center of it has drained it, diminishing its hydrology in the root zone. Side -cast fill from the ditch excavation altered topography and soil structure in the wetland, which also may have impacted the extent of the original Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-058 7 Builders Development, Inc wetland. Based on wildlife sign observed during the site visit, including several signs of fox habitation, the ditch corridor of Wetland #lmay be a locally important habitat for fox, as well as a travel corridor for other species of wildlife. Wetland boundaries, property boundaries, and sample point locations indicated on figures in this report are approximate. Precise locations of sample points and wetland edges should be determined by a licensed surveyor and be reviewed and approved by Svoboda Ecological Resources prior to inclusion in any site plan. In addition, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) must approve of wetland delineations on current or former agricultural lands. RECOMMENDATIONS Activities which impact or potentially impact jurisdictional wetlands are currently regulated at several levels of government. Federal (Corps of Engineers), State (Department of Natural Resources and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency), watershed, and Local Government Units may all be involved in reviewing a single project. To avoid potentially costly project delays, it is essential that all necessary permits be acquired from all jurisdictional agencies prior to initiating any development activities. A WCA Sequencing form, Wetland Replacement Plan Application form, and a DNR permit application are among the materials that it may be necessary to complete if wetland impacts are proposed for the delineated wetland area A functional assessment related to wetland quality may also be important in the planning and permitting process. It is very important to plan ahead if wetland permits will be needed for a proposed project. By initiating the permit process as early as possible, costly project delays may be avoided. Additional information regarding permit requirements and procedures is available from SER upon request. Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-058 8 Builders Development, Inc DATA SOURCES Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory Map, Carver County. 1984. Scale: 1" = 5280' (1 mile). United States Fish & Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map -Shakopee, Minnesota Quadrangle. Date. Scale 1:24,000 (Taken froml989 aerial photographs). Soil Survey of Carver County, Minnesota. 1968. U.S. Department of Agriculture. LITERATURE CITED Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and R.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, FWS/0BS-79/31. 103 pp. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Gleason; H.A., and A.C. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx. 910 pp. National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. 1991. Hydric soils of the United States. U.S. D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC. Misc. Publication 1491. Newcomb, L. 1977. Newcomb's wildflower guide. Little, Brown and Company Ltd., Boston and Toronto. 490 pp. Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No, 97-058 9 Builders Development, Inc Reed, P.B. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Minnesota. National Wetlands Inventory, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, FL. Shaw, S.P., and C.G. Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Circular 39. 67 pp. Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-058 10 Builders Development, Inc CERTIFICATION This delineation was completed in accordance with the 1987 procedural manual by Michael S. Fishman, Julie Sherlock Fishman, and Jeffrey Olson, whereby the edge of the wetland was marked by stakes in the field for location by land surveying methods. The delineation meets the standards and criteria described in the appropriate federal manual and conforms to applicable standards and regulations in force at the time the delineation was completed Prepared by Michael S. Fishman, Wetlands and Wildlife Ecologist, and Jeffrey Olson, Botanist/Terrestrial Ecologist, on this day, May 30, 1997. Client: Project Name: SER Project Number: Builders Development, Inc. Dogwood Road Site 97-058 Location: Chanhassen AL�-'�L ��� Wetlands & Wildlif cologist PFIMIJMM��Aw Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-058 8 Builders Development, Inc Figures tN - zaaa NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY Shakopee, Minnesota Quadrangle Dogwood Road Site Svoboda Ecological Resources Figure I COUNTY SOIL SURVEY Ge Glencoe silty clay loam (Hydric) HaD Hayden loan, 12-18 percent slopes HaE2 Hayden loam, 18-25 percent slopes HcE3 Hayden clay loam, 18-25 percent slopes, severely eroded ilN ,• =,3.0• LaB Lester loam, 2-6 percent slopes LaB2 Lester loam, 2-6 percent slopes, eroded LaC2 Lester loam, 6-12 percent slopes, eroded Pm peat and muck moderately shallow, over loam Soil Survey of Carver County Dogwood Road Site, Chanhassen Svoboda Ecological Resources Figure 2 DNR - PROTECTED WATERS 12 JC1iA"SS -F 4N I"- I tU Carver County Dogwood Road Site, Chanhassen Svoboda Ecological Resources Figure 3 NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE DATA Dogwood Road Site Svoboda Ecological Resources Figure 4 Precipitation Deviations From Average (1977-1996) NWS station data located in Chaska, Carver County, Minnesota - yearly totals compared to 30 year average 20 18 - - ----------- 16 1------------------------ ----------------------------- ---------- m14 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- t°Av 12 ------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------- 10 - - ------ - ------------------- d' 8 ----------------------- ------------------------ ------ ---------- 3 6 --------------------------- ------ ----------- 3 f----------------------- 4t-------------- ------------------- 2 ------------- - ------ ----------- —------------ ------ - -- --------------- .-- ------ --- - - a ° 0 -2 ------ a� ---- =----------- --------------------------- --------------------------- - ------------------------ - o-4 -Q -6 ------------ --------------------------- - -------------------------- ----------------------------- -8 ----------------------------------- ------------------------------ -10 —--------------------------------------- ----------------------------- v -12 —__________________________________________ _____________________________ -14 i__________________ -16 =----------- -18- ------------- — -- ------ ---------------------------- --- -20 } 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 Year NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE DATA Dogwood Road Site Svoboda Ecological Resources Figure 4 ?m�»:\�2�� a� � � /� � � : ��� //� � � ��d» � ���� ©2- - > ®� � m «� d /��� � §/� � \�\�� y= � � � � � � � � �; ,,• Ar. :: 4�3 �'i ,.;.� L Appendix A Routine Determination Forms SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES Wetlands Inventory & Delineation • Fisheries • Wildlife • Natural Communities Site Name: Doewood Road Site BasiMArea: 1 Investigators: Michael Fishman & Julie Sherlock Fishman Disturbed Condition? Yes— No X Nature of Disturbance: Date: 05-21-9.77 Sample Point ID: i�1VWET Community Type: M.rh-a Fa c5t- VEGETATION DominantsC>20%+ basal or aerial coverage) SDeCieS StratumIndicator Status y+rn di LA 5V ST F^( -+- R i k i 11 f u ®V S T FA6-14 ®V S T FRLW '4'(" do H V SO FnGW— HVST H V S T H V S T Non -dominants Species Stratum Indicator Status 5A,jet,,, < tsv • c.5 H VST FAL W A H V S® Ot3l_ H V ST H V ST H V ST H V S T H V S T >50% of Dominants FAC - or wetter J Yes _ No >50% of Dominants FACW, OBL (FAC -neutral test) _ Yes _ No _ NIA Notes >50°/u do" v.a.,.t, C'Vv , In - 1d24 tot n. s - t � SOILS County Soil Survey Map Unit Carver County. Minncsots Shect No. 19 A Soil Series is on National Hydric Soil List ,- Area mapped as depression or wet spot on Soil Survey Field Observations Hydric soil assumed because plants are OBL and FACW and wetland boundary is abrupt Mineral Soil _Y Organic Soil HorizmMenth Matrix Color Texture FeaturesC( n"-'42 r" �- 4t .7.5 W. a-� . - rr o� .' •:rr:!^�'. //tN�tyi /Ay U -.i j.. ID YR Jl � �F r 7-7 j`l. Hydric Soil Present? � Yes _ No _ Undetermined Notes 5a+pty tZ.a Di C, Sal S l,' , ✓i r u u HYDROLOGY Depth of sampling '�/n Inches Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Inundated, Depth of Water _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Free water in borehole, Depth from Surface S3" _ Water -stained leaves Water Marks, Elevation Local Soil Survey Data Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits FAC - Neutral Test Hydrology Criterion Met? _X Yes _No _ Other Observations ,�r' vt �' (+. ba. -- ria 1-t- #t'+ 12a Kyi'y WETLAND DETERMINATION 1s the Sample Point in Wetland Yes -_V _ No _ Undetermined _ Distance from Delineated Edge 1 ft. NIA_ Notes A` \ � 3 r v i iav'r-A "+ . SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES Wetlands Inventory & Delineation • Fisheries - Wildlife • Natural Communities Site Name: Dogwood Road Site Bmin\Area: i Investigators: Michael Fishman & )ulic Sherlock Fishman Disturbed Condition? Yes _ No X Nature of Disturbance: Date: 05-21-27 Sample Point ID: 3-9—f- Up Community Type: rv'dr+i c -Co.-et f VEGETATION Dominants (>20%+ basal or aerial coverage) Species Stratum Indicator Status H V S® F-^ V J �•... :.�•s s^.d�•s.. H V®T FACW terve S f In rs '(a r -u s ®VST FkG U a- Snrtxnru..n-a,Fftr: Lc ®V S T FP, GV H V S T H V S T H V S T Non -dominants SD[CIeS Stratum Indicator Status ( �0.11,u^ S T U.hr A (DV ST FPA<, H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T >50°/a of Dominants FAC - or wetter _ Yes _�_ No >50% of Dominants FACW, OBL (FAC -neutral test) _ Yes _L No _ NIA Notes V10 /, QW i vsi N/ e 0- :^ �/.� n 12IA t S SOILS County Soil Survey Map Unit Carver County, Minnesots Sheet No. t9 Soil Series is on National Hydric Soil List Area mapped as depression or wet spot on Soil Survey Field Observations _ Hydric soil assumed because plants are OBL and FACW and wetland boundary is abrupt _, Mineral Soil _ Organic Soil Horizon/Depth Matrix Color Texture Features - s'r. y'' rede< . .o(/ el') 33` y..�� d=/' r- u.t .91 Z1 '2 S12 4rm6e.'e.r Hydric Soil Present? 1 Yes _ No _ Undetermined Notes HYDROLOGY Depth of sampling -33 Inches _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Inundated, Depth of Water _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Free water in borehole, Depth from Surface 3A Water -stained leaves Water Marks, Elevation _ Local Soil Survey Data Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits _ FAC - Neutral Test Hydrology Criterion Met? Yes 3e No Other Observations no nl (,n -t ✓"k- v`[ o WETLAND DETERMINATION Is the Sample Point in Wetland Yes _ No -�— Undetermined _ Distance from Delineated Edee I/ ft. N/A_ Notes SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES Wetlands Inventory & Delineation • Fisheries • Wildlife • Natural Communities Site Name: Dogwood Road Site Date: 05-21-9 Basin\Area: 1 Sample Point ID: sP I A — W5 Investigators: Michael Fishman & Julie Sherlock Fishman Community Type: IA/C(-yw-AGt or,-/ Disturbed Condition? Yes X No_ Natureof Disturbance: Ava i-. pg "d.t•{-r.C. VEGETATION Dominants (>20%+ basal or aerial coverage) species Stratum Indicator Status PkA(Q rig 6i res n4, +a r" ,f HQ✓ S T PAe I/✓+ H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T 'Ion -dominants Stratum Indicator Status H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T >50°/u of Dominants FAC - or wetter -4,/-Yes _ No >50% of Dominants FACW, OBL (FAC -neutral test) ✓ Yes _No _N/A Notes SOILS County Soil Survey Map Unit Carver County. Minnesots Sheet No. 19 �, Soil Series is on National Hydric Soil List _ Area mapped as depression or wet spot on Soil Survey Field Observations Hydric soil assumed because plants are OBL and FACW and wetland boundary is abrupt X_ Mineral Soil X_ Organic Soil Horizon/Depth Matrix Color Texture Features Q= I'a" "r7 -Z-T/ I fleaf �sruc/[ n ro' — 7-'l" IU YR :I, r.o" Hydric Soil Present? 'I _ No _Undetermined Notes HYDROLOGY Depthofsampling 21" Inches _ Inundated, Depth of Water Y Free water in borehole, Depth from Surface _ Water Marks, Elevation Drift Lines or Sediment Deposit _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Water -stained leaves Local Soil Survey Dara FAC - Neutral Test Hydrology Criterion Met? -,�L Yes —No // r Other Observations r✓ .:.a / % z --- .,rl WETLAND DETERMIINATION Is the Sample Point in Wetland Yes -X_ No _ Undetermined _ Distance from Delineated Edge NIA_ Notes All 3 /1rrEu I A tA.Aa - Notes SOILS County Soil Survey Map Unit Carver County, Minnesots Sheet No. 19 1y Soil Series is on National Hydric Soil List Area mapped as depression or wet spot on Soil Survey Field Observations _ Hydric soil assumed because plants are OBL and FACW and wetland boundary is abrupt _Y` Mineral Soil _ Organic Soil Horizon/De-Rlh Matrix Color Texture Features Hydric Soil Present? _y_ Yes _ No _ Undetermined Notes HYDROLOGY Depth of sampling Inches _ Inundated, Depth of Water _ Free water in borehole, Depth from Surface O/ " Water Marks, Elevation _ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits Hydrology Criterion Met? _ Yes _.X._ No .0 Other Observations go In.fuoled Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Water -stained leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC - Neutral Ten WETLAND DETERNIINATION Is the Sample Point in Wetland Yes _ No-/ Undetermined _ Distance from Delineated Edge ft. N/A_ Notes . V 1,6w I A * K SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES Wetlands Inventory & Delineation • Fisheries • Wildlife • Natural Communities Site Name: Doewood Road Site Date: 05-21-97 Basm\Area: i Sample Point ID: .SPV — UP Investigators: Michael Fishman & Julie Sherlock Fishman Community Type: L JeA- 01 gi.) Disturbed Condition? Yes X No Nature of Disturbance: d Oat ;'1 v d "I cc, ft t, VEGETATION Dominants (>20%+ basal or aerial coverage) Non -dominants ecies Stratum Indicator Status SpeciesStratum indicator Status i PI%i[ fa V15 AvuvtAi✓'I ®V S T F?JW+ H V S T H V S T- H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T >50% of Dominants FAC - or wetter Yes _ No >50% of Dominants FACW, OBL(FAC-neutral tut) _Yes _No _N/A Notes SOILS County Soil Survey Map Unit Carver County, Minnesots Sheet No. 19 1y Soil Series is on National Hydric Soil List Area mapped as depression or wet spot on Soil Survey Field Observations _ Hydric soil assumed because plants are OBL and FACW and wetland boundary is abrupt _Y` Mineral Soil _ Organic Soil Horizon/De-Rlh Matrix Color Texture Features Hydric Soil Present? _y_ Yes _ No _ Undetermined Notes HYDROLOGY Depth of sampling Inches _ Inundated, Depth of Water _ Free water in borehole, Depth from Surface O/ " Water Marks, Elevation _ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits Hydrology Criterion Met? _ Yes _.X._ No .0 Other Observations go In.fuoled Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Water -stained leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC - Neutral Ten WETLAND DETERNIINATION Is the Sample Point in Wetland Yes _ No-/ Undetermined _ Distance from Delineated Edge ft. N/A_ Notes . V 1,6w I A * K e VOBODA E! LOGICAL Inventory & Delineation e Sna Name•.22 guinCAxa: Invcaisemat ]- G :iLSo Disturbed Condition? YES— No ,/ L Nature of Duturbanee: URCES • Wildlife • Natural CommunifW AaAY 2�, /Fy Semple rotor ID: Community TYPe: .��/oa✓,� G:/ s'ar«. VEGETATION Dominants L20%+basal or aerial wve gc) jpeckf Ssntum Indicator Suess H V Se"i:+s " F,PAk;uVi PFmV 1-VAnf%CA H V S rrf:L<) H V S T HVST HVST HV ST HVS7 >50% of Dominants FAC - or wetter /Yd_No >SC%of Nan -dominants Sween r - Ststus ��vJY .da rr»e•liS ^V S Tr-�, 22 st 2:cTt/n�a _ H V S / HVST HVST THvsTH V ST - K v sT Dominants FAM OBL (FAC -neutral test) , Ya _No _N/A d 1 NOtcs ��[i a ,^t°nlr�+ratfr.c.. it 'T'.0 �twf�ti. SOILS County Sail Survey :Kap Unit Sol) Series is an National Hydsie 5oll Lim Ara roapped AS depression or wet spot on Soil Survey Field Obsavadons Hydrio eil assumed becalu plud2 ora OBL Yid FACW and wedatd bowdery is abrupt / Mineral Soii _ Orsanie SO - H ^, tv7JI Texmm n ✓.� Yl / r Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No _Undetemdned Notes 4n HYDROLOGY 12 :naha9 Depthoe sampling Inches O:IMed Rant Cheauels in Uper p _ Inundated, Depth ofWater1 /f _ Dn i.•tnse Pattcros m Wedaods _LZ Free weerin berth*). Depth from Serfs= 0— "1 � Wsser-ssairwd ;eaves _ Wast Maria, elevation Local Sou Suvey Dats Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits FAC • Vptard Tat HyGolosy• rtterion Met? ti- Yes —No - -? y G l �o rC•O 1w• t r-3 •J2 FIe4 Dt.'terOWeve:ors WETLANDDETBRMIINATION Is the Sample ruin! in Wetland Yes L%Na Undttetmired DIStance bun Deiixated Edge ,R r Nota ZO 3Md A ECOLOGICAL Inventory & Delineation • Fisheries [ Wildlife • Natural COMMUHlties Site Name: i i9 •�P D.te�f Bulnvtmw>r SAMPle roint ID: Z) - r" (s 10 Yp �a may, !y- ✓i )E Irnadgatoes: r 4 -.ter O. Community Type: �r r 7ke�/i—��D k .u' ✓Q''>`o�[,rJ\ Dinufbm CondlUon? Never: of Divarbm : el i f e tiro VEGETATION (d DominanTs (>i0'.i+ bud or xrial coverage) CnCia Indfrffiot Stxw f'/ra,/,¢z;c nn'r/n�i n.aC�4 Fx/v 5 T fiC + H V S T H V S T HVST H V S T H V 5 T HVST tSaK C { r- Nen-dominant Indieor Sutus _ e�-ACuI HVST HVST HV5T H VSY HVST H V S T >50% of Dominams FAC - or Weser -' Ya _ No >51755 of Dominants FACW, OBL (FAC-nelMll tad ._ Ya _No _ N/A Notes SOIIS County Soil Snrvay Map Unit Soil Scrics is on National Hydric Soil List Ama mapped a depteasloo Of wet spot on Sou Surrey Field Observation Hydric soli assumed because pleats arta 08L and PAC W and wenand boundary u Abrupt al Soil ts C%Mie Soil --z I _1Z.Vis, _� Forizou/Denth Matrix Color Texture Fenturess i Iq r ! ,lr O Z{ 5r`ay. Hvdre Soil Present? ZY. _ No _ Undatermlrxid Notes r! HYDROLOGY Oufdhsd P.not Chsar:els in Upper C ineh:3 Dreinaee Paams is Wedands Water-stainod leaves _ acd Soil Survey Dna FAC • Neutral TM Dcixltofsampling 3! malas Inuodsmd. Depth of Water r ! Free water In borehole, Deprtl Som Stuiece ' � Wan Msrk% Plevation Drift Lina or Seditnerrt Deposits Hydrology Critedon Metz 0 Other Obs aflow WETLAND DETERMENATION Is dtc Semple Point Is Wedmd Yee —11e'S'o —Undetermined Disaix from Dellncatcd Edge —3, WA__ Notes Da 3,�d 3:16(TI53J =13 7'Q2Q'c. _ aro::DZi9 cS:C: t6E:!CZ!_0 SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES yetlands Inventory & Delineation • Fisheries Wildlife • ,Natural Communities Site Narita: 0 ,..rr-J it&, Daae: l���Y>' a ? I Basintwrca: A �.iq Semple Point lD• 6+C��'�% • 4q Z—J, •f%. I,vezilgswri: f F'< elt, ex Community Typo: �:. • i� �7 "If 91,-W r ion Disturbed Candltlan7 Yes No _ FFi"iil fi•'4 O Nature of Dlsturbanee: S'�a•%,r.•. ,� ,r •�i ,:•n / VEGETATION Domipgpjs (>20% 4 bus] or aerW ooverege) Seems C da, . k 8 re -s s � lu4Kalar states Ay,r-4.rod .tAegS T G_fLe H V 5 T H V 5 T H V S T HVST HVST H V S T Non-dominerrt: lndicsnr Statl< d-(� �tP V 5 T �V S Ty L Ca2rlr H V&,' Cw_ rat`;„md.vrce ©tvSTF&a HVsr HVST HVST >50% of Dominant FAC -or�wetter _Yes zwo >50% of Dominants FACW, DEL(PAC•nentN t&M Yes —No —MIA G Ja P Nota r'/••yi.: ,7.:...�a.a..-- � Py.^r� SOrts County Soil Survey Map Unit _ Son Series is on Nations] Hydric Son Lin Ana mapped as depmsiM Of Wee rpnf on Soil Survey Field Observation• Hydric soil auamed because plants are OBL and PACW and wetland boundary is sbrapf Mineral Soil _ Organic San Matrix coler l'o /R "A- :7 rn siz /441 Hydric Soli Present? eyes _ No _ Undeteahincd Now Fayuree s'r ,'n niifl�f '.uuaY'f_ �tatft_ e( e 1v YA -Tj. pi r #L41 �i =ROLOGY Depsb ofsampling 2,-, Inches ,_ ceddvad Roof Chati in Upper l2 taches inundated, Depth of Water DtsWV Panctns In Wetlands / i 4J Fra water in bosahole, Depth them Surfas Were,-ssalned Icavo 't^� _• Water Marks, Elervadon Locai Soil Survey Not 4d,tr Drift Lines or Sedim_cm Deposits -� FAC -Neutral?m Hydrology Critarim ;.Sett Yes � Other Obsarvadaas '' p /.r /w'�•• ha , ... r(,o�'�y WETLAND DETERMINATION Is the Sample Point in Welland Yes _• Vo C/Undetermined Distance from Delineated Edge _R. N,A, Notes 50 39t,'dc1fL9� t'773 t:QpEO^S c0F0 L.pLL9 cSL: .6E :''Li, r50 REPLACEMENT PLAN APPLICATION Westwood Community Church Chanhassen, Minnesota Revised August 3, 2004 Prepared for Westwood Community Church Prepared by Pioneer Engineering NA -026620-03B (V.2.01 for MS WORD)02/14/03 Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects USE THIS APPLICATION FOR ANY PROJECT AFFECTING A LAKE, RIVER, STREAM OR WETLAND, INCLUDING: Local Government Unit Approval Pursuant to Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Act (WCA) Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Permit to Work in Public Waters Department of the Army Permit (33 CFR 325) Note: The U.S. Arany Corps of Engineers (COE) will forward application forms to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for processing if state water quality certification is required from the MPCA. You do not need to send this application to the MPCA. This application packet includes : Part 1: The BASIC APPLICATION and the COE APPLICATION to be filled out by all applicants (see Instructions). PART 11: The REPLACEMENT PLAN SUPPLEMENT to be completed only for projects that impact wetlands and require a replacement plan for wetland mitigation. If you're not sure whether your project requires a replacement plan, call your Local Government Unit (LGU) or Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office for guidance. Do not proceed with your project until you have received all required approvals from your LGU, the DNR and the COE. If you wish to confirm ' the status of your application at any time, contact the agencies directly (see Instructions, page 2). Proceeding with work before all required authorizations are obtained may result in fines or other penalties, and may include a requirement to restore the project site to original condition. ' If you have questions or need assistance with filling out these forms, contact your local SWCD office, your LGU, your Area DNR Waters office, or your COE field office (see Instructions, page 2). If you believe that your project may be subject to watershed district, local zoning, or any other local regulations besides those of your LGU, ' contact those offices) directIv. If you are a Federal Farm Program participant and your project affects a wetland or water body on agricultural land, your eligibility for USDA benefits maybe affected. Contact a Natural Resources Conservation Service office for further information. A QUICK LOOK AT THE PROJECT APPLICATION PROCESS . Electronic files: Forms can be downloaded and filled out using Microsoft Word Yom input will be restricted to fill-in fields where users can enter text or check boxes. These areas appear gray on the screen, but not on the printed document. ' Send copies of these completed application fomrs to your LGU, your Arra DNR Waters office, and vow COE regulatory office. Any of the agencies may make initial contact with you to: a) inform you that it has nojurisdiction ova your project; b) request additional information needed; or c) inform you of applicable fees. ' When Yom application is considered complete and appropriate fees have been received (if requested) it will be distributed for appropriate review. Following agencies' reviews, you will be informed if it has been approved, approved with changes or conditions, withdrawn, or denied. For information about state laws, roles and regulations that direct this process go to the web she www.revisonleg.state.mn.us. For information on U.S. Army Corps ' of Engineers regulations go to the web she www.mvp.usacemny.mil. Instructions for Part I ' HELP 1: Every applicant must fill out Section 1. The applicant is the person, agency, company, corporation, or other organization that owns, leases, or holds other legal rights to the land where the project is located. Indicate names of multiple applicants on a separate sheet. ' HELP IA: Fill out Section 1A only if you have designated an authorized agent. An authorized agent may be an attorney, builder, consultant, contractor, engineer, or any otherperson or organization designated by the applicant to represent him/her in this process. An agent is not required. HELP 5: Purpose, description and dimensions of project: State briefly (in a sentence or two) what you propose to do and why it is needed. Also, describe whether your project will involve any of the following: Construction of structures, filling, draining, dewatering, removing, excavating or repair. Construction of an access path, bridge, culvert, dam, ditch, dock, driveway, riprap, mad, sand blanket, shore protection, or tile line. - Construction of any structures on fill, piles or a float -supported platform. If so, describe. ' - Dredging or discharging (placing fill material) into a wetland or other water body (including the temporary placement of material). If so, explain the specific purpose of the placement of the material (such as erosion control) and indicate how it will be done (such as with a backhoe or dragline). If dredged material is to be discharged on an upland site, identify the location of the site. Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Waland Projects hrstructions, Page 1 ' Include an overhead view drawing showing the work to be undertaken and its relative location on the property. Show items such as property boundaries or lot dimensions; location and extent of shoreline, wetlands and water, location and dimensions and footprint of the ' proposed project, structure or activity (include length, width, elevation and other measurements as appropriate); points of reference such as existing homes, structures, docks or landscape features; indication of north; and location of spoil and disposal sites (if applicable). Hand drawn, compute generated or professionally prepared drawings are acceptable, as long as they contain all necessary information clearly, accurately, and in adequate detail. Please include specific dimensions whenever possible. You may also include photos, if you wish. ' HELP 7: For information regarding adjacent landowners, contact the tax assessor where the project is to be developer HELP 8: If any part of the work has already been completed, describe the area already developed Include a description of structures completed; any dredged or fill material already discharged (including type of material and volume in cubic yards); acres or square feet filled (if a wetland or other waterbody); and whether the work was done under an existing pewit (if so identify the authorization, if possible). HELP 9: Other permits, reviews or approval related to the project may include the following: conditional use permit; plat approval; ' zoning variance; National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit; state disposal system permit (includes dredged material disposal); watershed district/watershed management organization permit (stomrwater, erosion, floodplain); environmental assessment worksheet/environmental impact statement; hazardous waste site; feedlot permit; groundwater appropriation permit; or county/township driveway/road pemnit. Are you aware of any archeological or cultural resource determinations or surveys completed concerning the project or ' replacement site by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) or others? If yes, please explain on a separate sheet or attach a copy of any determinations or surveys. Final Checklists (Part I) ' ® Have you completed a0 of Part I (Page 1), plus the Federal application (Page 2)? ® Did you (and your agent, if applicable) sign Section 10 on page 1? ® Have you signed the Application for the Department of the Army Permit (Page 2) to seek Federal authorization of your project? ® Have you included the necessary attachments for Part I? Attachments must include: ® Site Locator Map (Section 3) ® Type of Project (Section 4) (if additional space was needed) ' ® Overhead View of Pmject (Section 5 and HELP 5) ® Project Purpose, Description and Dimensions (Section 5) (if additional space was needed) Attachments may also include: ® Applicant Contact Information (HELP 1) (if additional space was needed) ® Project Location (Section 3) (if additional space was needed) ® Project Alternatives (Section 6) (if additional space was needed) ® Photographs ® Adjoining Property Owners (Section 7) (if additional space was needed) ' ® Work Already Completed Section (Section 8) (if you answered YES) ❑ State Historic Preservation Office determination or survey 1 I Submitting Your Application Make three copies of the entire application and all attachments. Keep the original, and mail a complete copy of your application to each of the local, state, and Federal entities listed below. Be sure to include Part I and all attachments with each application. LOCAL: Send to the appropriate Local Government Unit (LGU). If necessary, contact your county Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office or visit the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) web site (www.bwsr.state.mn.us) to determine the appropriate LGU. STATE: Send to your Area DNR Waters office, attention Area Hydrologist If necessary, contact your county Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office or visit the DNR website (wwwArinstate.mn.us) to locate the Area Hydrologist for your location, or contact a Regional DNR office: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: 2115 Birchmont Beach Road N.E. 1201 East Higbway 2 1200 Warner Road 261 Highway 15 South Bemidji, MN 56601 Grand Rapids, MN 55744 St Paul, MN 55106 New Uhn, MN 56073 Phone: 218-755-3973 Phone: 218-327-4416 Phone: 651-772-7910 Phone: 507359-6053 FEDERAL: Send to the appropriate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulatory field office Brainerd: SL Paul: La Crescent: U.S. COE, Regulatory Branch U.S. COE, Regulatory Branch U.S. COE, Regulatory Branch 10867 E. Gull Lake Drive N.W. Army Corps of Engineers Centre 1114 South Oak Street Brainerd, MN 56401-9051 190 5`" Street East La Crescent, MN 55947-1338 Phone: 218-829-9402 St. Paul, MN 55101-9051 Phone: 507-895-8059 Phone: 651-290-5375 WEB SITES: BWSR: www.bwsr.state.nm.us U.S. ACOS: www.mvp.usacemmy.mil DNR: www.dm.state.®.us Minnesota Local/StatelFederal Application Fonts for Water/Wetland Pmjects Insvuctions, Page 2 Two Harbors: U.S. COE, Regulatory Branch 1554 Highway 2, Suite 2 Two Harbors, MN 55161 Phone: 218-834-6630 MPGA: www.pca.snte.muw I VY/LO/VY A.... .. O„Y .1t I — 04/29/2004 15:36 6516819488 NA42651a0 5 Minnesota soo- PAGE 02/04 (V1.01 for MS WORO106/14103 Form for Water/Wetland Projects ' I Application No Field Of cs; Cade Date 1nitlal Appliaatian Received Dem initial Ap2hainino Dinned COmpletc PART 1: BASIC APPLICATION "See HELP' direct, you m impartam additional Information and asdoaaee in Insemcdon5 Paac L ' 1. LANDOWNER/APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION fSea Herp 1) 9E-'— 1W Name Westwood Community Church Phone: 952•Bii P74`r Complete mailing address:) X331 ' 31a1Weaf r l ce(l,Y/ IA. AUTHORIZED AGENT (See Ne/p IA) (Only fappficaafe,• an agentit" mfubed) Name: 519 BleckwBnn Photic 051 881-1914 Complete mailing address: Pioneer Ergmeenng, 2422 Enterprise Drive, Mendota Heights, MN 55120 NAME, TYPE AND SIZE OF PUBLIC WATERS or WETLANDS DKPACTED (Attach Addt&r1d1 Profoet Area eheets if ueedn) Nmne m I.D. o of Waters Impacted (if applicable; iflmown): ' (Check all that apply): ❑Lake ❑River OWetland type ® 1 ❑ IL ® 2 ® 3 04 ❑ 5 ❑ G ❑ 7 O 8 Indicate sire of entire lake orvcdand (check one): 0 Less than 10 sorts (indicate sire: 2.5 aa) ❑10 to 40 arms ❑ Greater than 40 ones 3. PROTECT LOCATION (Jnformatfon can befmtnd on property rax statement, property (file or ride in5ii'daca): t ", = street address: Trunk Highway 41 8 W. 70e St. Fire a: City (if applicable): Chanhassen 'A Sadon: SW Section: 9 TowtWhipit: 11G Romgcq:23 County: Carver Lntm Block: Subdivision: Waretshed(nome oro) 20055 ' Attach a temple site looker map. if needed, Include on the map written directim s to the site flan a known lomnon or Iaadmsdc, and provide distances from known locations. Label the diem SITE LOCATOR MAP. 4. TYPE OF PROJECT: Describe the type of proposed work. Attach TYPE OF PROJECT sheet if needed. ' sea attached S. PROJECT PURPOSE, DESCRIPTION AND DIM 14STOVS: Dcvmbc what you plan to do and why, it is nodi d, how you plan to consttuet the project with dimensions (lcttsth, width, depth), aro of impact, and whin You propose m construct the project This is the ' moa Impotent part. of your stimbutio n. See HELP 5 before completing this section: see What To Include on Flaut (Itloampri(xt e. PW 1). Attach PR0-WCTDE3CRIP770N sheet see attached footprint of project: acres or 30,033 square feat drained, filled or excavated 6. PROJECT ALTERNATIVESr What ahernatives to this proposed project have you considesud thin would avoid or minimize impact w wetlands or waters? List a: least TWO additional alramphvts to your project in Section 5 that avoid wctlanda (one of which rosy be "no build' or "do nothing'), and cuyldin why you chose to plume the option described in thio application over these alt:-marive9. Attach PROJECT AL7ERNATItr£S -hen if hooded. see artached narrative I. ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: For projeeat that impact mom than 10.000 square Ilea of waler or wetlands, list the complete mailing nddrcsses of adjacent property Owners on an anadmd eeparatc sire, (See HELP 7) ' S. PORTION OF WORK COMPLETED: Is any porion of the work in wetland or watar actin already completed? ❑ Yes ONO. If yet, describe the completed work On a separate sheet of paper labclod WORK ALREADY COMPLETED. (Sec HELP 8) 9. STATUS OF OTHER APPROVALS: List any other pemils, reviews err approvals related to this pmpud project that ate either pending or ' have already ben approved or denied on a separate ar tithed Soci:L Se-_ HELP 9. 10, f am applying for Bute and local eathorioation to conduct the %vark described in this application. I am famplic with the infmrnatton connine d in this applici eirn. TO the best of my knowledge and belief, all m5t;rmation in Part I is vee, complete, and accurate. I possess the ehority m andmtake rite whiledescribed, M 1 am seting as the duly Ruth ager of the licwaL S( 11 Ifappfitryyt( t& --1r) r, gore, Stgaaturo ofggertr(ifopp(icable) Date This block nand he signal by the peraen rate dea re; to undert,kethe proposed aedv(ty and bin the n¢oary profit It ridvasn M a, V emly the Arcot hoc xiRrcd. PhanG sa nab o ireparatc aherl signed try the landowner, giving napery amhedradtxf to the Agent. Minnesota LouVStua'Federal Application Form for WaterlwWod Pre*% I 04/29/2004 15:36 6516019488 PIONEER ENG PAGE 03/04 nicoublkltvlden for line t'ad4efimnfmfmmpdanfsemrpetednavengc l Db.or pernNonee, allhavab n,e mgivnC of up plicaoam aboultl rvgmrs noun or lana e unit mv�r.er. dao tinlb,—ewtrrlmvu;nrW. amtclnng eabR"n'a ting dean wweas, inR� mpntam gM1so doe veede4, and mngmf�i and r a+a"Ml the eolkchm of mfamrtim seed canreneea6 Wa+adma ties bode^ eanmpe er Itly ed+ee arylet of a16 cdtaetlaae Mhararmpaoe. inclndivg tygptldeM fur rodaring act.: aeeren, m Deaeraoun ofiXroax. wNhoRem Neadamrma lerviu Dimc:oroH of MNmmenon Opmnom atb )ropers. 1215 Jeaersen Davit NlChwpr. Suer 1209, Adiagtt4t VA 22202J3@::ma n is OIGra v(RfWagemmt mal BydM Paotvwadr Redoet6n PeoiectlDrlbOn031, WgnJpwr,DC 20503 reaandmo amid bewmc ",nos wAi.;n w aq Pealb tar failing ro oomph aN • roneaim of infvrmaden iter daW net Nepiny n mmaaly+Dna OMB eorrval aunbot. Plvaev DO NOT RBRIRN your hem m NlFer of tlr.e eeaelmR, Cmnpleted sepanvenv enol Fe ruhmhred m the Dievicteopinrn Irving JoAed:kaon (iter rhe )n!elan Of the pnop®f activity. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT: A haayse. Reap end Hither; Am Searan I D. 5.1 1101C 40. Clean Waft AOL Becton 4D4.33 USC 134: Nodne rnvetnea. Research nod Siaaunnes Act.33 USC 1413. 5ce"n I03. Pri cgal pumas: 1ntri maoon provided on dde from will be a;ed in evNwting the 11101010en fora permit Rmne im;; Tn'a Infoemstien mitt be;namd wpt Nc lhp.mamt atlwtiec end ad+rr Pcdml, eon. evd lsN peenwenaleWues. tuhmissKn oftpasewrd vlomudwe i; volaM>sy:Fmrere., if nrfanmtivn' 'ed� 't tmi be 1 ed poapek ore krud TSEMS 1 THROUGH 4 TO BE FILLED IN By THE CORPS I. APPLICATION NO. 12. WYLD OFFICE CODE3. DATE REC67VED 14. DATE APPI.ICATION COMFLETED ' ' fl I YOU DO NOT NEED TO COMPLETE ITEMS 0.10 and 12.25 in the SHADED AREAS. AA fipplif w must mupluc eon -eluded items 5 and 26. If an agent is used &be canplate hems 9 and 11. This optional Fedcral form is valid for we oniv when included as pat of this entire scant applicel packet I 1 1 I S. APPLICAN'T'S NAME I g. AL-174031IZLU AGENTS NAME APM TITLE (anngmt ievoctaqukrd) wasnaood eommunhy Chxw BB Bkticwern. LrMsrape Architect �aenb�Aha. v` .�ik'tlt mfr r 57..'f ars. 61 " rr5a£eeTiel1 a. T'-'�1e.�w -t4�. a. 'e Il. STATEMENT OF AtTTBORI ATMN(ifappffoobfe; mnrpfem ealy ffaurborisng an algo"V I herby nithom BID BlarAwenn Coact on r"behalfaa my agent in theprococsng of aus application E1141110 ddL upon negmL matnlemmol tar a='Fapp 41.11 421f ,VJ7 -;a x- �,.,�n�* r '..a, 'ys,+ � X01. � - � t i 1Mk •+�' �+}aaaa..��hYS r d ttn -e+ .ti �+.J•zi''„S,'', F'ii 5�1` M'+.a . h4 r 4'. .. z'. am t i . .:i 'V. , !J! {. �'4 n.!]��M 1141 V�:1 �:i t�, i 'aai.V! f4 ✓v,��,,, ,Ii p't �Tr'U L. I. ei%iLa"l'1"';.'^9'^a"•3 �"'I" .,l nP'4a:•,s • a ,', y : L .r"... i i t y x b :�.'•'z. i N Y i as �£ #A'kPIY �s/.. y, V t�r1F P*" tri' .'..Tor Aa\HG. �•2Ll iga't �x .140 "Yapt+ r e e �'ptiA,lra4Y, -�'� ', "% „J • yr V tVft`"wee' A '�... v> `'i"uAl•,,,A45,. { T z «+r n irrf 7 . x ° Id t'lrky S a ...tv lamer .... '- a Tg d^ l..Cr �Atiti d �' f dF n ,a� ,,..•r hh'Cir\ �" r" •JOi�i`t .Sia�`�F, 4�1'Lf14 df,' -•l x,.a., 'I''y yt !2 3? ems+ •Wen+++Ce +...e/�"., +�MAIPe a .ova w{Wr+� v NlHRRI 1 ,f>•-AR-� i5s .sir!. xer uy�..r V .:.h�.7 �1:e e •. a M •. - 3wa 8 c r4" -e" - -. T I�r 4n.a i .l .:.y_':•.. - e.. -s `•r'rJJ ... i .SP,14 ft ,.L,y 4,N'" 7;? ' :?:"' Do 7; ) r r%1'{'Afi_r_` 'ice",` d f a(" _.D.7 k. . 7 x"cY`MI c•:ti.,-?v,. i�` acr;tgdtx3Me HIM enr.idx;f#I'�,1,.`r*p`r 26. AppBeedon u hacby mmede Tor a permit or pendb to andwri2e the work daaribed ire this application. I catify dent the %formation in drip application is comp)ctc and accurate. I further cerrify that 1 pogaas the aarhonry to nrA%rbd a the wank dmmbed herds cram acting aR chit dariY ea- razed agar Off illhe Uppp�Ililn e+f�t. C `-�.�1" � B .vue of apph= Date ptaape afPgoN(ifanY) Dsc e application mint be signed 6y the person wba desires to undadle lbe papered mlirw (ai dieaml. u, h ney be Rigned Ire a dolt nddamieed omit if the netemon m Blodr l l hue been filled rnn and stped. IN FiS.C. Scefian 1001 pmvida char t4Toevrr, m ay manner within thv jurivN<dm of Wry dmaremcwt pe aFevry of rlec United 5*ncc kno.ietFly e>Od anlifWly fnlvfirt. eorade. ar mvatp t>D aydl rmY Rivk. tohetne, ar divgurFes r tmteriet fict ar melee avy false, ficutioue or, Innideleat ytpaintain car rgsam®1om or 1nakw oe mca any M1tae warning or dneummt Ivrm+iaa.v+r to rrmtain Wry fake. fiaetiat S Or fiaudalan M xamon i m ertry, droll be fined oat more than SI0,0o0 ar imprisoned not more dawn fav, years or bod'.. ENG FORM /3a5, JUI 97 EDMON OF FEB 9413 OBSOLETE. (Proponmr CECW-OR) Mirmerok LoinV91awTede tI Applieanan Facenz for Watc,(Wetiand Prcj=U Page: Instructions For Part II Complete those portions of Part II: Replacement Plan Supplement for which information is readily available (such as location, existing land use, size ' of impact area, etc.) A person certified in wetland delineation must determine items pertaining to specific wetland impacts (wetland type, predominant vegetation, watershed name, etc.) Contact the local soil and water conservation district (SWCD) office for further information on obtaining such items. What to Include on Plans Detailed overhead views of replacement site(s) (Part I1), as well as profile view(s) of replacement site(s) (Part 1I), may be either hand drawn, computer generated or professionally prepared, as long as they contain all necessary information clearly, accurately, and in adequate detail. Please include specific dimensions whenever possible. You may also include photos, if you wish. ' Overhead views of Part 11 replacement site(s) should include the following items that pertain to your project: Property boundaries and/or lot dimensions. Location and extent of shoreline, wetlands and water. ' Location and dimensions of proposed project, structure or activity. Include length, width, elevation and other measurements as appropriate. Points of reference (such as existing homes, structures, docks or landscape features). Location of inlet and outlet structures. Indication of north. ' Location of spoil and disposal sites (if applicable). Areas of wetland and upland plants established Profile views (side or cross-sectional views) should include the following items that pertain to your project: Location and dimensions of proposed project, strucrure or activity. Include elevation, depth, soil profile, side slope and other measurements as appropriate. Proposed water level elevation. Final Checklists Part IL Replacement Plan Supplement ® Have you completed all of Part H (pages 3-5)? ® Did you (or your agent) sign Section 19 on page 5? ® Have you included the necessary attachments for Part H? Attachments must include: ® If the project includes any wetland banking (complete or partial), include Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits Form (Section 14) ® If the project includes any project -specific replacements (complete or partial), include: ' Description of Replacement Wetland(s) Construction (Section 15) Copy of vegetation management plan (Section 15) Scale drawing of overhead view or replacement wetland (Section 18) Scale drawing of profde view of replacement wetland (Section 18) ' Attachments may also include: ® Additional description of Wetland Impact Charts (Section 11) (if additional space was needed) ❑ Additional Description of Replacement Wetlands charts (Section 17) (if additional space was needed) ❑ Additional soils information for created replacement wetlands) (Section 18) (if available) Note: To deposit surplus wetland credits in the State Wetland Bank, submit a Wetland Banking Application directly to your LGU (Section 16). Preparing Your Application for Mailing ® To apply for both state and Federal authorization, your application must include Part I (Page 1), the Federal application (Page 2), and attachments as indicated on Final Checklist for Part I (Instructions, Page 2). ® Your application must also include Part H (Pages 3-5) and additional attachments as indicated on Final Checklist for Part 77 (above). ® Make three copies of the entire application and all attachments. Keep the original, and mail the three copies to the appropriate local, state, and Federal agencies (see Instructions for Part I for addresses). ' Minnesota I ccal/State/Federel Application Forms for Water/Wedand Projects Instructions Page PART 11: REPLACEMENT PLAN SUPPLEMENT For assistance in completing Part II, contact vour Local Government Unit or a professional consultant 11. DESCRIPTION OF WETLAND IMPACTS: Complete the chart below: 1) Use one row of boxes for each wetland impact: 2) If vow project bas more than one wetland impact, reference your overhead view (part of Section 5) to this chart by identifying and labeling "fust impact" and "second impact" on your overhead view; 3) If you are identifying only one wetland type within a given wetland impact area use the first dotted line and leave the others blank; 4) If van have chosen to identify more than one wetland type within a given wetland impact area use the extra dotted lines to indicate each wetland type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted area for each separate wetland type within that impact area; 5) If you do not have access to some of this information, call your LGU or SWCD office for assistance. (Photocopy chart for more impacts, if needed.) DESCRIPTION OF WETLAND IMPACTS Wetland impact (as noted on overhead view) Watershed name or number (if known) County, Section, Township, Range Wetland types Predominant vegetation in impacted wetland area Size of area impacted (in acres or square feet) Existing land use in project area (check all that apply) 20055 9,116,23 112 reed 30,033 sq.ft. E Housing canarygrass, E Commercial First ------------------- -tvuc�elrter----------------------- ❑ Industrial impact E Parks/recreation areas E Highways and ___________________ ----- --------------- associated rights-of-way E Forested E Farmsteads/agricultural E Vacant lands ❑ Public and semi-public (schools/gov't facilities) Second[3Airports ------------------- ----------------- -------------- ❑ Extractive (gravel impact pits/quarries) ❑ Other: 'If you are idemifving only one wetland type within a given wetland impact area use the fast dotted line and leave the others blank. If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type within a given wetland impact area use the extra dotted lines to indicate each separate wetland type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted area for each separate wetland type with that impact area. TOTALS OF AREA(S) IMPACTED FOR EACH WETLAND TYPE ON CHART (indicate acres ❑ or square feet ®) Type: U— 1L: 2: 30033 1 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: R: 12. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Are you aware of any special considerations that apply to either the impact site(s) or the replacement site(s)? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Examples: the presence of endangered species, special fish and wildlife resources.. sensitive surface waters, or waste disposal site.) If YES, list and describe briefly. 13. SHORELAND IMPACT ZONE: Please identify each wetland impact site noted in Section 15 that is within 1000 feet of a lake or 300 feet of a river. Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Forms for Water/Wetland Projects Page 3 ' 14. HOW PROPOSED REPLACEMENT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED: Indicate bow proposed replacement will be accomplished (check only one box below and continue as indicated): ❑ A. Wetland banking only Complete Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits Form and include with your application. Copies of this form are available from your LGU, or download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us Skip to Section 19, page 6 (You do not need to complete Sections 15-18). ' ® B. Project -specific replacement only Continue with Section 15 below. ❑ C. A Combination of wetland banking and project -specific replacement ' Complete Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits Form and include with your application. Copies of this form are available from your LGU, or download a copy from www.bwsr.slate.mn.us Continue with Section 15 below. 15. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND(S) CONSTRUCTION (Complete this section only if you marked Boz B or Box C in Section 14 above): Describe in detail bow replacement wetland(s) will be constructed. If several methods will be used, describe each method. Details should include the following: 1) type of construction (such as excavated in upland, restored by file break, restored by ditch block or revegnated); 2) type, size and specifications of outlet structures; 3) elevations relative to Mean Sea Level or established benchmarks or key features (such as sill, emergency overflow or structure height); 4) what best mmagement practices will be implemented to prevent erosions or site degradation; 5) proposed timetable for starting and ending the project; and 6) a vegetation management plan. Write this description on a separate sheet of paper labeled DESCRIPT/ON OF REPLACEMENT WETLAND CONS7RUC770N. see attached narrative 16. SURPLUS WETLAND CREDITS: If using project -specific replacement (Box B or Box C in Section 14 above), wM the replacement result in any surplus wetland credits that you wish to have deposited in the State Wetland Bank for future use? ❑ Yes ® No. If yes, submit a Wetland Banking Application directly to your LGU. Copies are available from you LGU, u download a copy from www.bwsr.state.mn.us 17. DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLANDS: Complete the chart below: 1) Use one mw of boxes for each wetland replacement site; 2) If you project has more that one wetland replacement site, reference you overhead view (pan of Section 5) to this chart by identifymg and labeling "first replacement site" and "second replacement site" on your overhead view; 3) If you are identifying only one wetland type within a givm replacement site, use the first dotted Imes) and leave the others blank; 4) If you have chosen to identify more than one wetland type in a given replacement site, use the extra dotted lines to indicate each separate wetland type, and identify type(s) of replacement credits and "restored or created" for each separate wetland type with that replacement site; 5) If you do not have access to some of the information, u if you do not know you replacemwt ratio, rill vow LGU or S WCD office for assistance. Phomcopv chart jar more wetland replacements, if needed.) DESCRIPTION OF REPLACEMENT WETLANDS Identify Watershed County Section, Wetland Type(s) of replacement credits Restored Wetland name or Township, Type' (in acres or square feet) or replacement number created? site (d known) Range New Wetiand Public Value Indicate (as noted on Credits (NWC) Credits (PVC) R or C overhead view) Name of 20055 Carver 9,116,23 12 31,650 sq.1L 14,500 sq. R C First---------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------- replacement 13,916 sq. ft. C site----------- ----------------------------------------------- ------------- Name of Second ----------- ----------------------------------------------- ------------- replacement site ----------- ----------------------------------------------- ------------- 'Cwcular 39 wetkand types: Indicatel, 1L, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, R, m U. Ifyon are 31,650 sq. ft. 28,416 sq. ft. identifying only one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the first TOTAL NR'C TOTAL PVC dotted line and leave the others blank. If you have chosento identify morethan one wetland type within a given wetland impact area, use the extra dotted lines to indicate REQUIRED REPLACEMENT RATIO: each separate wetland type, and identify predominant vegetation and size of impacted arilf %NOWn% 2:1 ea for each separate wetland type within that impact area. Minnesota Local/State/Federel Application Forms for WaredWetlmd Projects Page 4 I 1 I Ci 04/29/2004 15'36 6516819495 PIONEER ENG PAGE 04/04 Is, ADDTITONAL INFOIEMAT70N REQUIRED FOR FROJEC .01MCMC 1tRMACEMLrNT (Rteui ad only if Yon marked Bet 8 or Da: C in SaChnn 10 For project, lavoiving at )Care Come projeaKpedfle roplaeetneat, include the following additi®d mimminion: ® 7wa drnwinRc m ,ole ofma replaeemmt wrlaM inoludc both overhead view and profile Isidc view or cwrir stint l view). See B liar ro include nn Plan dnreractian0. Page 3) for a devdlad description of what should be included in these dmwinps. Without drawings, your application will be considered Incomplete ® For created rCplaaCmeRt wetland; usclude addie oral ani)q infomaho s (if available) the indicates the capabiliryof the ni e m Meduce and maim weland Cb=me9ahe._ Natelt For replacement wRtaads located on pipeline earwneaa, you rani torccuvc and"Cleea Cfya protect" both the =01 91 Mldr and me Mirmcwa DwoemM,. of Public Safery'e Office nfleipeli, Sn&ry. Before Ghat nfannsneetloa the ownerofany mllhiag muse beaotified. 7belandowruorranimeoria ,..pwdblc for giving thea nnnee by calling "Gopfrer Sum OnsCsll" at 652-454-0062 ITnla Cities Mevo Ma) or 14100-252-1166 (all other leeaerne). Nme 2: Ter extensive or Complex projects sepplemmtary information may be aapuoofrd a a tun daed from one or mote of the eaponding Al"Cies. Such mfarmadon may include (but nae bn limited to) the folioneing; "graphic map, watertable mop, soil borengp, depth poundings. neria) photogrupba. aniionnrmUl asses a m andtar msmeeemg repares, 19. SIGNED AFFIRMATION FOR PROJECTS DYYOLV WG REPLACEMENT BY WETLAND BANXTNG ONLY. To the beat of my knowfadLe said belief, till iofvrnmian or Pan 71 is we complete and sornuate; and I affirm slut the wcelmd lmonr will be replaced via withdrawal from an account in the Stere W dad Bmk. FOR PROJECTS INVOLVING EFTER PROJECT -SPECIFIC XF]FLACEMENT ONLY OR A COMBINATION Or WETLAND BANXTNG AND PRO.MCT-SPECMC REPLACEMENT: Pan At The replacenuml wetland. IIMM mss the rep),ierment wtalaod was roper Previomly teasorcd or wvtd ostia a pro M appleved r�lecerttart pint m pavmtu AND -Drained or filled under an cxampsion during the previous 1 n ycora: AND Reawtud with Manctal assiseau:e from public Conservation props, i AND Restated t .mg pnv funds, other than landowner fun it, unless the Jtndr arc paid back with interest to the individual or orismi"lon inn: funded the r amavon: and 6. dnyvihul or mEahizalion nodFaa me kcal govenwtem snit in wrir:,g mar die Rumd v ,tltad may be mnctdered for replacement. PAR B; Addifiesd •xa ran— (ebmk all that apply)' ® The -ahrod will be =placed bcfhm or cohnnreot with the actual dramtng or filling of a weyad. C Aa itrevocahie bank leper of credit, perfmtNnoe bond, or oder acteplabk otapity has bent provided to gunnmic sueeessful mtrtpWioa of the wedged replacement. ❑ The wetland losses will be replaced via wnhdriwel from on eeaaant in the Skta W etlond Bank. Pan C. For projeces, ha vols W4 any pnjaer-specific replaelRpeet: Within 30 drys of ekber receiving apPmni of this opplienhon or beginning work on ffie pnject� 1 will reccrcl the Declandon of Reeaictlons tied Coveneau an the dead for the property on which the 2Plaremrnt weefand(o) will be lorakzd and I will a: the same time suMnn Proof of such recoding . du I -CU. To one Fqr timed Inow)edge and belie( all mlhrmatioe in Pan 17 to true, cpmp)a(a aid ocnuate; and I aZ= all sh!amons In Part A and C. l well m Cbac a (.) n Part B. 1� M, s a Sig tWe Or af>plicanr rA�[ \ �/ Date .pt.�J I LaJ 1 j,{ a 7Jr" FOR LGU USE ONLY 1 Rephrecment plan to (cheek onel: ❑ Approved ❑Approved wish onnditionc (conditions awched) ❑ Dented LGU gQivafrlgMane Dore ' LGU hes receive V-1denee of tide and proof of recerdiep ufDeclatWons ofReAtriedoac and Covenama her ReplAeeromt Wetland: 1 Cotmsv-hare .n,. w,e Dare Docurnarri14ara(evedfryrecedrr LGE) o.Maldl rhmaw,r nate Nimes= lxal/SutdPtdanl Application Fomes for W aec/uleland Proleotp Page 5 11 U 1 Wetland Replacement Plan Wetland Conservation Act Westwood Community Church Chanhassen, Minnesota Revised August 3, 2004 Introduction and Background In May 1997, Svoboda Ecological Resources, Inc. completed the delineation of two wetlands on the subject property located in the NW'/ SW'/4 of Section 9 and the NE '/4 SE '/ Section 8, T1 16N, R23W, Carver County. A copy of the wetland delineation report is included in Appendix A. The delineation was reviewed in May 2001 by Svoboda, and the boundaries were revised by the Technical Evaluation Panel in July 2001. ' The site is bounded by Trunk Highway 41 to the east, Tanadoona Drive to the north and undeveloped land to the south and west (Figure 1). The location of the impact and replacement areas on the site are shown on Exhibit 1. The topography is rolling according to the U.S.G.S. Shakopee Quadrangle and National Wetland Inventory wetlands and hydric soils are shown on Figures 2 and 3. The Westwood Church project includes a parking lot expansion of 134 stalls and an additional access drive at the request of the City of Chanhassen. On -Site Wetlands Wetland 1 is a partially wooded wetland with a reed canarygrass-filled meadow in the northern portion. It is located in the south-central portion of the site on the southern property boundary. No basins were designated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as Protected Wetlands. Lake Minnewashta is located one-half mile to the west of 1 the site. Detailed information regarding each wetland's type, vegetation composition, soils and hydrology can be found in the wetland delineation report tin Appendix A. 1 I 11 I I 1 Lt WCA Replacement Plan Application Westwood Community Church August 3, 2004 Page 2 Project Need and Purpose The purpose of the project is to provide additional parking for a church with an expanding congregation in the rapidly growing southwest surburban area of the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The site is guided by the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the current site use. It is located in close proximity to the developed portions of the City of Chanhassen, Excelsior, Chaska and Victoria. Proposed Impacts One wetland impact is proposed. This impact is proposed strictly for construction of a public street (78th Street extension) across the southern perimeter of the project. This impact totals 30,033 square feet. The wetland impact areas are shown on the attached Grading Plan (Exhibit 2). Sequencing Avoidance and Minimization The "no -build" alternative would avoid wetland impacts. However, as the congregation of Westwood Church has grown, parking needs have exceeded current capacity of the parking lot. Subsequently, parked vehicles will overflow into nearby streets, including Tannadoona Drive and Trunk Highway 41 impeding circulation and posing a safety hazard to a regional highway. The City of Chanhassen has requested that the parking lots have a second access due to capacity and emergency access concerns. A "no -impact' alternative would not provide a second public or private right-of- way access to the church since there is no other location available for a second access route. The City of Chanhassen has requested a second access to the site due to the safety concerns cited above. Currently, traffic control officers are needed during church services due to the congestion on Tannadoona Drive and Trunk Highway 41. No other alternatives are available to provide access to Trunk Highway 41 since the church property is landlocked by the parcels owned by others to the east and south. The only existing access is from Tannadoona Drive. A second access on to Tannadoona Drive will not solve the congestion problems since all traffic will still be funneled onto Tannadoona Drive. A previous alternative was generated that provided access to the site via a private driveway in the location of the 78th Street extension included in this proposal. This alternative had fewer wetland impacts due to the reduced width of the private roadway compared to a public street. However, the City of Chanhassen intends to provide a public right-of-way along the southern perimeter of the site by extending West 78th Street to the west from Trunk ' WCA Replacement Plan Application Westwood Community Church ' August 3, 2004 ' Page 3 Highway 41 toward Lake to the west of the church ' these other properties. Minnewashta. This street will service other properties site, and a private roadway will not adequately serve The public street width was kept to the minimum safe width within the right-of- way. Side slopes were maximized at 3:1 slopes. ' Rectification of Impact No temporary wetland impacts are proposed which could be rectified after project completion. Reduction or Elimination of Impacts Over Time Standard best management practices will be used which will reduce the impact to the wetlands through erosion control measures. Replacement of Unavoidable Impacts ' The unavoidable wetland impact of 30,033 square feet will be replaced through the implementation of the compensatory mitigation plan outlined below. ' Compensatory Mitigation Plan The Wetland Conservation Act requires replacement of drained or filled wetlands ' at a minimum ratio of 2:1 for the 30,033 square feet of proposed impacts. New Wetland Credit (NWC) of 31,650 (0.73 acres) is proposed for the site. The NWC area is proposed to be a Type 2 fresh meadow. ' Portions of the wetland that would be impacted are vegetated with reed canarygrass which is indicative of some disturbance. The New Wetland Credit ' area proposed to replace this basin will be planted with native sedge meadow ' species. Alternative Sites Alternative sites for the proposed project were not explored in depth since this site will accomplish the project purpose with minimal wetland impact. Further, this site is guided for the proposed use and if this expansion is not implemented, another church site may ultimately be needed, possibly resulting in greater wetland impacts elsewhere. ' Rectification of Impact No temporary wetland impacts are proposed which could be rectified after project completion. Reduction or Elimination of Impacts Over Time Standard best management practices will be used which will reduce the impact to the wetlands through erosion control measures. Replacement of Unavoidable Impacts ' The unavoidable wetland impact of 30,033 square feet will be replaced through the implementation of the compensatory mitigation plan outlined below. ' Compensatory Mitigation Plan The Wetland Conservation Act requires replacement of drained or filled wetlands ' at a minimum ratio of 2:1 for the 30,033 square feet of proposed impacts. New Wetland Credit (NWC) of 31,650 (0.73 acres) is proposed for the site. The NWC area is proposed to be a Type 2 fresh meadow. ' The NWC areas are in an area mapped as Hamel loam according to the Carver County Soil Survey (see Figure 2 in Wetland Delineation Report — Appendix A). ' Initial investigations indicated that the soils at the proposed NWC area have soils with characteristics indicative of this soil type. The Hamel loam is listed as a poorly drained soil. The NWC area would be excavated to a finished bottom elevation of 981.0' with an undulating bottom not exceeding 982.0' in the New Wetland Credit The hydrology the will be area. source of mitigation wetland ' WCA Replacement Plan Application Westwood Community Church August 3, 2004 Page 4 surface and ground water as it is in the existing Wetland 1 and treated ' stormwater from the proposed stormwater pond. The plan proposed should produce a saturated palustrine emergent (Type 2 inland fresh meadow) wetlands. The created wetland area will be seeded with the wet meadow mix and at the rates described on the Grading Plan (Exhibits 2 and 3). PVC is being generated by constructing one storm water basin on the site. The storm water basin (Pond C) is proposed to be adjacent to Wetland 1 (see Exhibit ' 2). The pond measures 14,500 square feet (0.33 acre) at the Normal Water Level (NWL). As allowed under Minnesota Rules 8420.0541 Subp. 10 (13)(1), up to 100 percent of the NWL area is eligible for PVC. ' This application also proposes to use 13,916 (0.32 acre) square feet of wetland buffer as Public Value Credit (PVC). The applicant will establish a 20 -foot wide native prairie buffer around the perimeter of New Wetland Credit Area (see Figure 3). This buffer area will be planted in accordance with the native prairie seeding specifications outlined in Appendix B. The total replacement wetland credit area for this project will be 1.38 acre (0.73 ' acre of NWC and 0.65 acre of PVC from wetland buffers and stormwater ponds - see below). In addition, the NWC area and the buffer area will be planted with the native prairie seeding after final site grading is completed. 1 I Il 1 11 I I 11 I WCA Replacement Plan Application Westwood Community Church August 3, 2004 Page 5 The total eligible wetland mitigation credits being generated are outlined in the table below. Table 1. WCA Wetland Credits — Westwood Church Mitigation Area Mitigation Type Acreage Used By To Be Project Banked East of Wetland 1 NWC 0.73 acre 0.73 acre 0.0 acre Upland Buffer PVC 0.33 acre 0.33 acre 0.0 acre New stormwater pond PVC 0.32 acre 0.32 acre 0.0 acre TOTAL 1.38 acres 1.38 acres 0 acres 1 Monitoring I fl I I The mitigation monitoring requirements outlined in the Wetland Conservation Ad will be followed. These requirements (per Minn. Rule 8420.0620) are as follows: 1) Description of the project location, size, current wetland type (Cowardin classification), and desired wetland type (goal). 2) A comparison of the as -built specifications versus the design specifications (first annual monitoring report only) and a rationale for significant changes. 3) Hydrology measurements: seasonal water level elevations or areal coverage measurements during the period April through October. 4) A map of plant communities within the boundaries of the replacement site, including hydrologic indicators observed. 5) Color photographs of the project area taken any time during the growing season. Annual mitigation monitoring reports will be submitted to the City of Chanhassen as required in its replacement plan approval. ' V1,5=Wi Cm� (7nnr; Clmilz -' Niiruaesou Repin®na¢ Pl= Appii=m I MONITORING PLAN ' The applicant agrees to monitor wetland mitigation areas as per the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act rule 8420.0600. Monitoring shall last for a period of five years following completion of the wetland replacement project, or until the Technical Evaluation Panel deems the replacement wetland to be fully functional. Monitoring reports will be completed ' annually by December 31 of each year, and submitted to Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District (the LGU for WCA), City of Chanhassen, BWSR and the U.S. Army 1 C I I LJ 1 1 I 1 1 Corps of Engineers. The report will describe actual wetland restoration or creation activities completed during the past year, activities planned for the upcoming year, and information specified below: • A description of the project location, size, current wetland type (Cowardin classification), and desired wetland type (goal) • A comparison of the as -built specifications versus the design specifications (first annual plan only), and a rationale for significant changes • Hydrology measurements: at least three seasonal water level elevations during the period April through October (mean sea level or referenced to a known bench mark) • A list of the dominant vegetation in the wetland, including common names of the vegetation exceeding 20 percent coverage and a estimate of coverage, for example, 50 percent willow, 20 percent cattail, and 30 percent sedge; and • Color photographs of the project areas taken anytime during the period June through August • Wildlife observed • Management problems and recommended corrective actions I 1 I I I I 1 Aeploce plum Apph=a MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR NEW WETLAND CREDIT AREAS AND BUFFER AREAS VEGETATION ESTABLIS%IMENT Once the basin has been excavated, the seeding surface will be prepared in accordance with the MnDOT Seeding Manual 2000. A cover crop will be seeded to provide temporary cover for the establishment of permanent native species, and to provide erosion control for recently graded areas. Acceptable species for the cover crop include annual rye or oats, or ReGreen. The site will also be seeded with MnDOT seed mix 25B (modified 25A) for prairie meadows and streambanks at a rate of 30 lbs. of pure live seed per acre on all disturbed soils within the wetland and buffer areas. Species requiring cold stratification or scarification should be pre-treated prior to seeding. Enclosed are additional specifications from the MnDOT Seeding Manual 2000. Once native species have germinated, maintenance activities will begin. The site shall be maintained as outlined within the MnDOT Seeding Manual 2000 with respect to exotic species control, mowing and weeding. In addition to on-going maintenance activities, yearly monitoring will be provided The conditions of the annual monitoring are provided in the attached Monitoring Plan. A perpetual easement is required for the New Wetland Credit areas and Public Value Credit (buffer) area banking. The attached Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) Form A Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetlands is attached Upland buffer monuments are recommended, as are conservation easement signs. If monuments are installed, a registered land surveyor should be consulted to locate these boundaries and prepare a legal description. If you have questions regarding this application, please call me. Sincerely, Pioneer Engineering, P.A. William J. Bleckwenn, RLA Landscape Architect 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Westwood Community Church Chanhassen, Minnesota National Wetland Inventory Legend Shakopee_3730_N WI_Wetlands * PIONEER * engineering 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Westwood Community Church Chanhassen, Minnesota r i fl, � - I ,r � }�� 8.±1 i l re. I • � C• Carver County Hydric Soils Legend _A Carver—Hydric—soils * PIONEER * engineering 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet 0 J I I I I I I � 111 �✓ / / I �- ! - /� / / / It ( % /� : � In t � �� �; ----- � �` 'arae ! f �•/ 1 k L� / )I/! �/ 1 �lt l\t\\I1�v1J C*c/�^y IMPACT AND REPLACEIMENT AREA SEE EXHIBIT 2 11 / -. l 1 t \ v 1 11) \. * PIONEER engineering PA * '* -µc mmElaes • °va powmvs 422 Enterprise MN 55120 (612) 661-1914 FAX -681-91 SMD PIAt M- tArmsus[ IAO41FCI5 625 Highway 18 N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 (612) 763-1880 FAX:783-1 104049—FINAL—WETLAND MIT EXHIBIT.DWG WETLAND C \ �\ �� ...... _% �:•.•.•.•:•:. ° v vvv °vv �� vvvvvv000vvvvavvvvvv v vvv / � vvvvvvv vvvvvv v ov \ \ ` i � J •••• _ vv v vvovvvvvvv vvv v / y� vvv v vovvvvvvoov ovvv vvv v v ��"�••• ,boos vvvvvv v v vv \O�EA� vv vv a /" / v v ev vv j LIC\VF•�UERED T•' �5 ,\ �, � � I a v v 14, 00 NEW WETLAND CREDIT r `` / vv vv X1,.650 SF. ° vv \ GR, DEdNZULATING B TT BETWEEN 981-.0- ............... vo 000 / SEED WITH MIND OT MI '1 WITH WET FORBS. 1 � vvvov / 1 r vvv vvv v i I I t ` / ' 1 / � / , .v.':.'...-. �� _- /• bdvvv c vev - .t.• ': 1:..: EXISTING NEW WE PO D C CREDIT AREA TO N / / EXISTING W UFFER 20 Sit / I TO BE CPM TO NEWj o 3:1 / �•-- �/ WE TLA REA. �: 77 ..... Fb / SECT{ON A F o ° a °� / S,C7aLE: 1" {,SEW WETLA t <0 13, 16 SF //. r,/ WETLAND FILL O w . ; t. " ::: :: :....L;` 30,033 SF vvv ovvv v 'v i 1 ° ocoov v v vvv v v v • .•vvv°vvvovgbv ovvv vvv °O vv / — •vvvvvvv vbv vvv. v vWv v v v v vvv vvvov ovo v° v I v o v v v v v v v v ovvv os+e vvvd v v v v v vv v. vv v vv vvv v 1 I I � AV I _ '� N � r O� 0 O� OO N .990 v v v ° .••�� / � I V PIONEER 104049 -FINAL -WETLAND MIT EXHIBIT.DWG engineering PA 2422 Enterprise Drive y vim* urws,evErovs ❑vl�n (612) 681{ 19169 4 FAX:5B7MN 129"b Date 7-30-04 PROJECT *TT wlorl4n,r8s•wmsr�xul m 625Hig6woy/ON.E. I Designed DAS WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH - WETLAND MITIGATION EXHIBIT 2 (61612 2), MN 55434 783-1880 FAX:7B3-1883 DFOWD PC 1000 •:• DATUM ELEV 970.00 * PIONEER engji�neering PA j 1[ L D 9 RKYgtS - GNB wONEE1t5 LANG R NF - L4IDSCME MWwm 0+00 2422 Enterprise Drive Mentloto Heights, MN 55120 (612) 681-1914 FAX: 681-9488 0+25 0+50 0+75 1+00 1+25 SECTION A -A 1000 1+50 1+75 2+00 2+25 SCALE: 1" = 25' HORIZ. 1"=5'VERT. 104049—FINAL—WETLAND MIT EXHIBIT.DWG i NEW WETL ND CREDIT NEW WETLAND BUFFER XISTIN / ETLA D EXISTING VETLAMD BUFER / TO BE CONVERTED TO NEW WE LAND 2REDI1. h• GR DE U DULA rING B TTOM 0+00 2422 Enterprise Drive Mentloto Heights, MN 55120 (612) 681-1914 FAX: 681-9488 0+25 0+50 0+75 1+00 1+25 SECTION A -A 1000 1+50 1+75 2+00 2+25 SCALE: 1" = 25' HORIZ. 1"=5'VERT. 104049—FINAL—WETLAND MIT EXHIBIT.DWG i ' SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES ' Providing the Sharper Edge in Natural Resources & Environmental Consulting une 12, 2001 ' Mr. Steve Lartu Westwood Community Church 7801 Park Drive ' Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: SER Project Name: Westwood Community Church ' SER Project No: 2001-043-03 Project Location: A portion of the NE1/4 of the SEI/4 of Section 8, T. 116N, R. 23W, City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota Project Description: Wetland Classificarion, Identification Delineation and Staking Services Report Amendment Dear Mr. Lanni, As requested, Svoboda Ecological Resources (SER) visited the above referenced property on May 9, 2001, to reexamine the site for the presence of areas meeting wetland criteria. Criteria for determining jurisdictional wetlands are as described in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation ' Manual (1997 Manual) as required by the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Per Mr. Lattu's request, SER visited the site to restake the subject property wetlands that yrere originally delineated in May 1997. The findings from the 1997 wetland delineation are presented in the report dtled Dogwood ' Road Site Weiland Classification, Identscation, and Delineation with a May 30 1997 date. This letter reportis presented as an amendment to the original report and is to be used in conjunction to the 1997 wetland delineation report. ' SER restaked Basins 1 and 2 following the same methodology As presented in the 1997 report. The basin boundaries are similar to those staked in 1997 and therefore SER recommends that the 1997 report be referred to for detailed information regarding wetland data. ' SER appreciates the opportunity to provide our services on your project. Please feel free to contact us at (952) 471-1100 if you have any comments or questions regarding this amendment to the 1997 wetland ' delineation report- Sincerely, eportSincerely, ' Svoboda Ec6logicai Resources ' Franklin J. Svoboda, CWB, PWS Vice -President Enclosures Cc: Jim Tiggelaar, Project Engineer, Hammel Green and Abrahamson Engineering SER project files ' 2477 Shadywood Road Excelsior, MN 55331 ' (952)471-1100(Ofnce) • (952) 471-0007 (Fax) 1 Vy/10!VY 1J. )M Vita V. vu.u.uu�.i..�. CITY OF CITY OF CHANHASSEN MMSEN FAX COYER LETTER 690GiyG! rDrioe,POBor147 Cba cxn,Minnnow55317 Fax Number: (952) 937-5739 Phone 612937.19oo / GrnoalFm612.937.5739 Date: Engu ng Far 612937.9152 Public S ty Fur 612934.1524 Web wwraashanhawn.mr ar Company: F6A- conwelly f: vz/va-7726 Attention: Jiro -r,81e1t0,r-1:4174332-96d3 Fax Number: Sent By: ^ L-py-\ SIC- Extension: 105 Sending a total of 2- pages, including this cover page. v� Please find the information you requested ❑ Please review and call me ❑ Please call to confirm receipt of this fax If you do not receive all pages, or are experiencing other problems hi transmission, please call 937-1900 and ask for operator assistance. vy, ♦o, vv 1�. r� rm o���c, ai.� �aaa _ - M 5 X Y i il6.y gow.�cRIN 9815A �-- r x - vslo �o BOrt1NO- ' X f VV ops ra gg6 is X f f BI • J C pbh / 978.7 B.) SOU)N LME OF 14E Sg11NW ST �fi 1 i6�E 705C.7{�t0�d). I ' OWNEP.: UNWERSITY OF MINNESOTA x ams / �, X 0761 I Providing the Sharper Edge iu )BOD NaturalPesources al EtmiroaiiiertaI-Consulting EcOOLOGICAL RESOURCES Jogwood Road Site Wetland Classification, Identification, and Delineation. report Prepared for: Builders Development, Inc. by: Svoboda Ecological Resources Project Number 97-058 May 30, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY.................................................................1 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES .......................................... 1 STUDY METHODS .......................................................... 2 RESULTS...................................................................3 OffsiteSurvey..........................................................3 Field Conditions......................................................... 3 Field Delineation........................................................ 4 DISCUSSION................................................................ 7 RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................... 8 DATASOURCES............................................................ 9 LITERATURE CITED ........................................................ 9 CERTIFICATION........................................................... 11 FIGURES 1. National Wetlands Inventory Map 2. County Soil Survey - 3. DNR Protected Waters Map 4. Precipitation Data 5. .Aerial Photo of Site 6. Photo Log SUMMARY Svoboda Ecological Resources (SER) performed a wetland delineation on a property on Dogwood Road in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota on May 21 and 27, 1997 Two wetland basins were identified and delineated, and three other areas were investigated, but were found not to be wetlands. The wetlands were delineated and classified according to appropriate state and federal methods and are subject to regulation at local, state, and federal levels. INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The subject property lies east of Dogwood Road and south of Tanadoona Drive in the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. It occupies the NE '/4 SETA Section 8, Township 116N, Range 23W, and the NWIA SWIA Section 9, Township 116N, Range 23W, Carver County, Minnesota. The parcel is surrounded by residential, wooded, and agricultural lands. At the time of the visit the majority of the property was recently tilled farmland, with deciduous upland forest at the west end, and a drainage ditch in the southeast portion. The Type 4 (PEMHx) drainage ditch ran through a Type 2 (PEMBd) wetland area into a forested Type 1 (PFOI C) wetland along the southern boundary of the property. Another forested Type I (PFO 1 C) wetland was located in the forested area at the west end of the parcel. Three other areas were investigated during the field visits, including a basin identified on the NWI maps as a PEMAd wetland, but all were found to not have the necessary criteria to be considered wetlands. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of wetland boundaries present within the subject property boundaries. Wetlands were also to be classified using both the Cowardin and Circular 39 classification systems. Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-058 1 Builders Development, Inc STUDY METHODS Prior to conducting the site visit, SER staff consulted NWI maps, Carver County Soils maps, aerial photographs, and MNDNR Protected Waters Maps to identify potential freshwater wetland habitats. Areas demonstrating evidence of wetland conditions were evaluated in greater detail during the field surveys. Vegetation, soils, and hydrology were examined during the field surveys, as outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (hereafter, "1987 Manual") (Environmental Laboratory, 1987). These three criteria were used to characterize and determine the extent of wetlands, and to determine the location of their boundaries. Wetland edges were marked with sequentially numbered 4 -foot lath and flagged with orange surveyor's tape imprinted with the words, "Wetland Boundary". The wetland edge was considered the highest extent of the wetland basin. Thus areas below the edge met required wetland criteria, while areas above the edge did not. Sample transects were established in representative wetland to upland transition zones. Each transect included two sample points located along a line running perpendicular to the wetland edge, one point being in the wetland, and the other in the adjacent upland. Each sample point was marked with 4 -foot lath marked with an identifying number and an indicator as to whether it was a wetland or upland sample point. The lath were also flagged with orange and black diagonally striped surveyor's flagging tape to distinguish them from wetland boundary markers. A Routine Determination Form was completed at each sample point (Appendix A). Wetland classification followed methods described in Cowardin, et. al. (1979) and used in the NWI (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). The Circular 39 classification (Shaw and Fredine 1956) was also determined in compliance with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-058 2 Builders Development, Inc ' Soil colors were determined using a Munsell Soil Color Chart and vegetation was identified using suitable keys (Gleason and Cronquist 1991, Newcomb 1977). Hydrophytic status of plants was ' determined using the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Minnesota (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1988). RESULTS OFFSITE SURVEY The NWI maps for the site (Shakopee Quadrangle) showed one PEMAd basin just west of the center of the parcel, and a large PEMAd basin with PEMCd and PFO1Cd inclusions in the southeast portion of the site (see Figure 1). This indicated Palustrine (P-), Emergent (-EM-) and Forested (-FO1-), Temporarily flooded but partially drained (-Ad), and Seasonally flooded but partially drained or ditched (-Cd) wetlands. _ The Soil Survey of Carver County, Minnesota, Sheet Number 19, (SCS 1968) indicated five different soil series on the subject parcel (see Figure 2). Of these, Glencoe silty clay loam was classified as a hydric soil in Hydric Soils of the United States (NTCHS, 1991). Peat and muck soils are considered organic soils, which are all considered hydric by the 1987 Manual. The areas identified as wetland or, the NW1 map corresponded to some of the areas classified as hydric soils. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Protected Waters Map of Carver County did not indicate any protected waters on the site (see Figure 3). FIELD CONDITIONS The delineations of the wetlands on the site took place on May 31 and 27, 1997. Precipitation data Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-058 3 Builders Development, Inc I 1 1 1 1 1 for this year (1997) was unavailable at the time this report was prepared, so predictions of groundwater level were made based on long-term data. The long-term precipitation data (see Figure 4) show above-average rainfall for three of the last four years at the National Weather Service station located in Chaska, Carver County, Minnesota. Temperatures averaged 561 F the week of the delineation, and the precipitation - a total of 0.4" for the week - was about 0.41" below average. Given this data, hydrology is expected to be fairly normal to below normal for existing wetlands in the area. FIELD DELINEATION The following text describes the wetlands identified on the site and the basis for determining the wetland boundary. Refer to Figure 5 for the locations of the wetlands and the sample points. Completed Routine Determination Forms can be found in Appendix A. The wetland areas on the site were comprised of a mixture of several wetland types as described below. Wetland 1 was a mixture of forested Type 1 (PFO 1 C), and reed -canary grass dominated Type 2 (PEMBd) basins, with a Type 4 (PEMHx) excavated -ditch running through both. The wetland area was mapped on the NN`WI map as PEMAd, PEMCd, and PFO1Cd, and corresponded to an area mapped by the SCS as Peat(Muck and Glencoe silty clay loam, both hydric soils (see Figures 1 and 2). Dominant plant species in the wetland included reed -canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) (FACW+), box elder (Acer negundo) (FACW-), jewelweed (Impatiens capensis) (FACW), stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) (FAC+), and Jack in the pulpit (Arisaema triphyllum) (FACW-). Non-dominant plant species included elderberry (Sambucus canadensis) (FACW-), and black willow (Salix nigra) (OBL). Svoboda Ecological Resources Project No. 97-058 2 Dogwood Road Site Builders Development, Inc ' The soils at the first sample point (SP 1), located in the forested portion at the southeast side of the wetland, were olive -black 2.5Y 2.5/1 hemic peat to a depth of fourteen inches. This overlayed a ' 10YR 2/1 clay loam with common, medium, distinct 7.5YR 3/4 mottles and a few tiny fragments of undecayed organic material (leaves, roots). Free water was measured in the borehole at thirteen ' inches from the surface. Upland soils at this sample transect were 2.5Y 3/1 clay loam with many small, diffuse 2.5Y 3/2 mottles and redox concentrations on ped faces to a depth of twelve inches. ' Free water in the borehole was measured at thirty-two inches from the surface. The wetland boundary around the forested portion at the south end of the wetland was flagged based on the change in surface soils from organic to mineral, the change in vegetation from wetland to upland, and a noticeable topographic change. The wetland edge around the ditch at the north end ' of the wetland was identified as the edge of the ditch, as the side -cast fill from the ditch created a steep slope on either side of the ditch that did not support any hydrophytic vegetation, and the water ' level in the ditch was in excess of twelve inches from the top of the bank. Soil sampling immediately adjacent to the ditch would have been meaningless due to the placement of the side -cast ' A second sample transect (SPLA) was established to determine the wetland edge in the area dominated by reed -canary grass. The vegetation throughout this area was entirely reed -canary grass, ' with a few young box elder trees scattered close to the forested area of the wetland. The soils were 2.5YR 2.5/1 peaty muck to a depth of ten inches, over a I OYR 3/1 clay, with no visible features. ' Free water was measured in the borehole at ten inches from the surface. Seven feet away, on the upland side of the sample point, the soils were 2.5Y 3/1 silty clay loam to a depth of twelve inches with free water in the borehole at twenty-two inches from the surface. ' The edge of the wetland around the reed -canary grass area was determined by the change in depth ' of free water in the borehole and a change in topography from smooth contour in the upland to an area of hummocks in the wetland. The entire wetland was flagged to the southern property ' Svoboda Ecological Resources g Dogwood Road Site ' Project No. 97-058 5 Builders Development, Inc I 1 1 boundary, where the NWI map indicated the wetland continued onto the adjacent property. Wetland 2 was a forested Type 1 (PFO 1 A) basin located in the forested portion of the west end of the parcel. The vegetation was dominated by American elm (b7mus americana) (FACW-) and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanicum) (FACW), with an understory of larger straw sedge (Carex normalis) (FACW) and Jack-in-the-pulpit. Adjacent upland forest species were dominated by sugar maple (Acer saccharum) (FACE), and included American elm and basswood (Tilia americana) (FACW-), with Jack -in-the-pulpit in the understory. Although this area was not identified on the NWI maps, and the soils for this location were identified as Lester loam, a non -hydric soil, the site met the three criteria for designation as a jurisdictional wetland. The soils in the -wetland sample point for this basin were four inches of organic material overjet black N/2.5 clay loam to a depth of six inches. Below the clay loam was jet black N/2.5 clay to a depth of forty inches. Based on this information, the soils of Wetland 2 are likely a hydric soil inclusion within the area of Lester loam that appears on the Carver County Soil Survey. Water stained leaves were observed on the surface, suggesting wetland hydrology, and free water in the borehole was measured at twenty-six inches from the surface. The heavy clay soils may have prevented free water from percolating higher at a clearly observable rate. The edge of Wetiand 2 was marked based on the change in dominant vegetation from sugar maples in the upland to American elm and green ash in the wetland. Area A, located in the northwestern portion of the property, on or near the property boundary, included an excavated ditch approximately four feet wide and sixty feet long, dominated by reed - canary grass. The soils in the ditch were IOYR 3/2 silt loam with faint 10YR 4/2 mottles and distinct 7.5YR 516 mottles to a depth of seven inches. Beneath this was N/2.5 clay loam with few, Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-055 6 Builders Development, Inc I 1 1 distinct, small 2.5YR 5/6 mottles to a depth of twenty-four inches, and I OYR 5/1 clay with common, distinct, medium 2.5YR 5/6 mottles to the bottom of the thirty-one inch borehole. Free water in the borehole was measured at twenty-seven inches from the surface. Although the ditch met the three wetland criteria, it should not be considered a jurisdictional wetland because it is a ditch created and maintained for agricultural drainage. The ditch has been maintained within the past five years as was evident from the lack of any woody vegetation developing in the ditch, and the side -cast spoil without any significant vegetation on it. Area A was flagged with orange and black diagonally striped surveyor's flagging tape to identify the area, however based on the field investigation of the site, SER does not consider Area A to be ' a wetland. 1 1 1 1 An area identified on the NWI mans as a PEMAd basin west of the center of the parcel was also investigated. This area corresponded to an area mapped as Glencoe silty clay loam (a hydric soil) on the Carver County Soil Survey. It was found to have no evidence of hydrophytic vegetation and no evidence of wetland hydrology, however, so it can not be identified as a wetland. DISCUSSI®N The wetland basins identified and delineated during the site visit meet the criteria of jurisdictional wetlands in the 1987 Manual. Therefore development activity that impacts or potentially impacts these wetlands is regulated under federal, state, and local law. Wetland 1 is at one of the lowest topographic points on the subject parcel. It is possible that the wetland covered a larger area at one time, but the ditch excavated down the center of it has drained it, diminishing its hydrology in the root zone. Side -cast fill from the ditch excavation altered topography and soil structure in the wetland, which also may have impacted the extent of the original Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-058 7 Builders Development, Inc 1 ' wetland. 1 1 1 1 Based on wildlife sign observed during the site visit, including several signs of fox habitation, the ditch corridor of Wetland #I may be a locally important habitat for fox, as well as a travel corridor for other species of wildlife. Wetland boundaries, property boundaries, and sample point locations indicated on figures in this report are approximate. Precise locations of sample points and wetland edges should be determined by a licensed surveyor and be reviewed and approved by Svoboda Ecological Resources prior to inclusion in any site plan. In addition, the Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) must approve of wetland delineations on current or former agricultural lands. RECOMMENDATIONS Activities which impact or potentially impact jurisdictional wetlands are currently regulated at several levels of government. Federal (Corps of Engineers), State (Department ofNatural Resources and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency), watershed, and Local Government Units may all be involved in reviewing a single project. To avoid potentially costly project delays, it is essential that all necessary permits be acquired from all jurisdictional agencies prior to initiating any development activities. A WCA Sequencing form, Wetland Replacement Plan Application form, and a DNR permit application are among the materials that it may be necessary to complete if wetland impacts are proposed for the delineated wetland area. A functional assessment related to wetland quality may also be important in the planning and permitting process. It is very important to plan ahead if wetland permits will be needed for a proposed project. By initiating the permit process as early as possible, costly project delays may be avoided. Additional information regarding permit requirements and procedures is available from SER upon request. Svoboda Ecological Resources Project No. 97-058 Dogwood Road Site Builders Development, Inc I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IF DATASOURCES Minnesota Department ofNatural Resources Protected Waters Inventory Map, Carver County. 1984. Scale: I" = 5280' (1 mile). United States Fish & Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map -Shakopee, Minnesota Quadrangle. Date. Scale 1:24,000 (Taken froml989 aerial photographs). Soil Survey of Carver County, Minnesota. 1968. U.S. Department of Agriculture. L;TER—, TURE CITED Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and R.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79/31. 103 pp. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Gleason, H.A., and A.C. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx. 910 pp. National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. 1991. Hydric soils of the United States. U.S. D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC. Misc. Publication 1491. Newcomb, L. 1977. Newcomb's wildflower guide. Little, Brown and Company Ltd., Boston and Toronto. 490 pp. Svoboda Ecological Resources Project No. 97-058 0 Dogwood Road Site Builders Development, Inc 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Reed, P.B. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Minnesota. National Wetlands Inventory, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, FL. Shaw, S.P., and C.G. Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Circular 39. 67 pp. Svoboda Ecological Resources Project No. 97-058 10 Dogwood Road Site Builders Development. Inc CE TIFIC .'nON This delineation was completed in accordance with the 1987 procedural manual by Michael S. Fishman, Julie Sherlock Fishman, and Jeffrey Olson, whereby the edge of the wetland was marked by stakes in the field for location by land surveying methods. The delineation meets the standards and criteria described in the appropriate federal manual and conforms to applicable standards and regulations in force at the time the delineation was completed. Prepared by Michael S. Fishman, Wetlands and Wildlife Ecologist, and Jeffrey Olson, Botanist/Terrestrial Ecologist, on this day, May 30, 1997. Client: Project Name: SER Project Number: Builders Development, Inc. Dogwood Road Site 97-058 Location: Chanhassen Wetlands & Wildlif cologist ICS I - tEcologist Principal Ecologist Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Project No. 97-058 8 Builders Development, Inc I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 Fi4yures I 1 1 11 1 1 L NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY V -200o. Shakopee, Minnesota Quadrangle Dogwood Road Site ' Svoboda Ecoloo cal Resources Figure 1 1 I LJ 1 1 1 COUNTY SOIL SURVEY Ge Glencoe silty clay loam (Hydric) LaB Lester loam, 2-6 percent slopes HaD Hayden loam, 12-18 percent slopes LAB2 Lester loam, 2-6 percent slopes, eroded HaE2 Hayden loam, 18-25 percent slopes L8C2 Lester loam 6-12 percent slopes, eroded HcE3 Hayden clay loam, 18-25 percent slopes, Pro Peat and muck moderately shallow, over loam severely eroded 4N 1"-1320, Soil Survey of Carver County ' Svoboda Ecological Resources I Dogwood Road Site, Chanhassen Figure 2 4sP F`.e�. DNR—PROTECTED WATERS IN uF Carver County Dogwood Road Site, Chanhassen Svoboda Ecological Resources Figure 3 I [1 I 1 UJ �I Precipitati®n Deviations Fr®m Average (1977-1996) NWS station data located in Chaska, Carver County, Minnesota - yearly totals compared to 30 year avera¢e 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 Year NATIONAL NNTATHER SERVICE DATA Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Figure 4 20 18 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 --------------------------------------------------------------- aa14------------------------ oA 12 --------------------------------------------------- ------------------- 10 — - 8 3 6- ---------------------- ----- 4 ------------------------ ------ ---- -- ------ ------- -------- - - aa - p 2 ------------ — --------- -------------------------------------------------- - -4 - ------------ -------------------------- -6 -------------------------- ------------ --------------------------- ----------------------------- -8 ---------------------------------_----------------------------- ---------- — ---------------- -10 -10 -------------- — ----------------------------------------------------- -u 12 ---------------------------- �M -14 + --------------------------------------------------------------- -16 T --------------------------------------------------------- -18 ------------------- 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 Year NATIONAL NNTATHER SERVICE DATA Svoboda Ecological Resources Dogwood Road Site Figure 4 a -ya % r ��� .t.. L Li w 3C` I I Cl I I I I I I I t_1 I I I I Appendix A Routine Determination Forms I SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES Wetlands Inventory & Delineation • Fisheries Site Name: Dogwood Road Site Bazin\Arca: 1 Investigators: Michael Fishman & Julie Sherlock Fishman Disturbed Condition? Yes _ No X Nature of Disturbance: Wildlife • Natural Communities Date: 05-21-97 Sample Point ID: Iq 9.1- WET Community Type: Kes, FpvCSf VEGETATION Horizon/Denth Matrix Color Texture may" t.5 7� j zcaf Features Dominants (>ioi+basal oraerial coverage) Non -dominants ecie Stratum Indicator Status Species Stratum Indicator Status ®V S T FhGt SA.40.'Vs Ca. AALis H V®T FA< -vv/— S �+v� v- u Arius-wta -l"t- �1� Ilu ®V S T FALW- OV S T fh(,W H V SQ 08t_ H V S T HYDROLOGY Oxidized Root Channels in Upper I'_ inches ur cCo H V S m F^n-V t- H V S T _ _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands H V S T H V S T 13" Water -stained leaves H V S T H V S T Local Soil Survey Data — H V S T H V S T FAC - Neutral Test >50% of Dominants EAC - or wetter \/ Yes _ No >50% of Dominants FACW, OBL (FAC -neutral test) _Yes _No _N/A */0 Hydrology Criterion Met? , X Yes _ No Notes > 150 e� ow '�„e, ,,,.7(,d �,w-• (n."4 L� v, r S Other Observations , v'rK i- r t ' SOILS Is the Sample Point in Wetland Yes -X_ No _ Undetermined Distance from Delineated Edge ft. N/A_ County Soil Survey Map Unit Carver County. Minnesots Sheet No 19 X Soil Series is on National Hydric Soil List Area mapped as depression or wet spot on Soil Survey Field Ob_ nervations _ Hydric soil assumed because plants are OBL and FACW and wetland boundary is abrupt Mineral Soil Y Organic Soil Horizon/Denth Matrix Color Texture may" t.5 7� j zcaf Features —Soil Hydric Present? V Yes _ No _ Undetermined ' ;Votes 5�V-4tJ Ot ii VLi/A, Ln i t 501 u S �+v� v- u ��n Depth of sampling 1.i_ Inches HYDROLOGY Oxidized Root Channels in Upper I'_ inches ' Inundated, Depth of Water _ _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands .)4 Free water in borehole, Depth from Surface 13" Water -stained leaves Water Marks, Elevation Local Soil Survey Data ' _ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits FAC - Neutral Test Hydrology Criterion Met? , X Yes _ No - ' Other Observations , v'rK i- bo" -f ,a 11 J�+ WETLAND DETERMINATION ' Is the Sample Point in Wetland Yes -X_ No _ Undetermined Distance from Delineated Edge ft. N/A_ Notes I SVOSODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES Wetlands Inventory & Delineation • Fisheries Site Name: Do -wood Road Site BasinkArca: - 1 Investigators: Michael Fishman & Julie Sherlock Fishman Disturbed Condition? Yes_ No A Nature of Disturbance: Wildlife • Natural Communities Date: 05-21-97 Sample Point ID: .�� "UP Community Type: rn.(<, i c -CO is t - VEGETATION Notes q HYDROLOGY Depth of sampling �_A3 Inches _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Inundated. Depth of Water _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands _Y Free water in borehole, Depth from Surface .3A _ Water -stained leaves W aur Marks, Elevation Local Soil Survey Data Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits FAC - Neutral Test Hydrology Criterion Mety _ Yes )( No Other Observations N o ✓a I rub F .^-L - Li WETLAND DETERMINATION r Is the Sample Point in Wetland Yes _ No 19-- Undetermined _ Distance from Delineated Edge aft. N/A Notes Dominants (>20%+ basal or aerial covenee) Non -dominants Species Stratum Indicator Status Species Stratum Indicator Status GC W' V4-0 "A., v.O H V S (?)A (jail t u... 5� ®! S T �`.. r.,.s U>.sdo. s.• H V®T FA r-VJ- U, fitA (DV S T Ztr�tver.-Fla CeUnru; ®VST FAGU a' H V S T IA e xAr U ne-a.ro�', eA—AU ®V S T FAG(A H V S T H V S T H V S T HVST HVST H V S T H V S T >501/6 of Dominants FAC - or wetter _Yes )�- No >5V16 of Dominants FACW, OBL (FAC -neutral test) _ Yes _'K No _ N/A Notes VAO fAwt i v A. h [ v - f 61 VD 11 •'t'i 5 ' soles County Soil Survev Map Unit Carver County. Minnesms SheetNo. 19 Soil Series is on National Hydric Soil List Area mapped as depression or wet spot on Soil Survey Field Observations Hydric soil assumed because plants are OBL and FACW and wetland boundary is abrupt Y`_ Mineral Soil _ Organic Soil - r Horizon/Depth Matrix Color Texture Features . t� z •� - ��Z. _- .7 "1 3,.Z M_ e('l -.3.�i"' d=J• c r 5n�A. Rtb�ii25 a7 SY ✓^ s .I AF'r Q .nnnr J ' Hydric Soil Present? _! Yes _ No _ Undetermined Notes q HYDROLOGY Depth of sampling �_A3 Inches _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Inundated. Depth of Water _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands _Y Free water in borehole, Depth from Surface .3A _ Water -stained leaves W aur Marks, Elevation Local Soil Survey Data Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits FAC - Neutral Test Hydrology Criterion Mety _ Yes )( No Other Observations N o ✓a I rub F .^-L - Li WETLAND DETERMINATION r Is the Sample Point in Wetland Yes _ No 19-- Undetermined _ Distance from Delineated Edge aft. N/A Notes SVOSODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES A Wetlands Inventory & Delineation • Fisheries • Wildlife • Natural Communities Hydric Soil Present? 7 Yes _ No _ Undetermined ' Notes HYDROLOGY Depth of sampling 2q" Inches _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches ' Inundated, Depth of Water_ ',,'',, — Drainage Patterns in Wedands Free water in borehole, Depth from Surface Water -stained leaves Water Marks, Elevation Local Soil Survey Data ' _ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits FAC - Neutral Test Hydrology Criterion Met? _.X- Yes —No Other Observations w40i - 1,z� - WETLAND DETERMINATION ' Is the Sample Point in Wetland Yes , X No _ Undetermined _ Distance from Delineated Edae �ft. N/A n t _ Notes 1 ,J (t/"rb, i q LA -1 a _ H V S T Site Name: Doewood Road Site Date: 05-21-97 H V S T BasintArca: _ I Sample Point ID: SP 1A - W5 H V S T ' Investigators: Michael Fishman & Julie Sherlock Fishman Community Type: we/y Azt oe,l H V S T Disturbed Condition? Yes X No >50016 of Dominants FAC -ttf wetter __Zyes _ No >50% of Dominants FACW, OBL (FAC -neutral test) _ZYes —No _N/A Nature of Disturbance: /fi vai'.ei IFM cCl-l-r.(, ' VEGETATION County Soil Survey Map Unit _Carver County. Minnesotss Sheet No. 19 Y� Soil Series is on National Hydric Soil List _ Area mapped as depression or wet spot on Soil Survey Dominants (>20%+ basal or aerial coverage) Svecies Stratum _Indicator Status Soccies Non -dominants Stratum Indicator Status �i1aLAv,S ✓unG �aua H�J S T LIJ H V S T Hydric Soil Present? 7 Yes _ No _ Undetermined ' Notes HYDROLOGY Depth of sampling 2q" Inches _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches ' Inundated, Depth of Water_ ',,'',, — Drainage Patterns in Wedands Free water in borehole, Depth from Surface Water -stained leaves Water Marks, Elevation Local Soil Survey Data ' _ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits FAC - Neutral Test Hydrology Criterion Met? _.X- Yes —No Other Observations w40i - 1,z� - WETLAND DETERMINATION ' Is the Sample Point in Wetland Yes , X No _ Undetermined _ Distance from Delineated Edae �ft. N/A n t _ Notes 1 ,J (t/"rb, i q LA -1 a _ H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T >50016 of Dominants FAC -ttf wetter __Zyes _ No >50% of Dominants FACW, OBL (FAC -neutral test) _ZYes —No _N/A Notes SOILS County Soil Survey Map Unit _Carver County. Minnesotss Sheet No. 19 Y� Soil Series is on National Hydric Soil List _ Area mapped as depression or wet spot on Soil Survey Field Observations Hydric soil assumed because plants are OBL and FACW and wetland boundary is abrupt _X Mineral Soil -)(_ Organic Soil Hotion/Den h Matrix Color Texture Features 10. %/;z =fir Hydric Soil Present? 7 Yes _ No _ Undetermined ' Notes HYDROLOGY Depth of sampling 2q" Inches _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches ' Inundated, Depth of Water_ ',,'',, — Drainage Patterns in Wedands Free water in borehole, Depth from Surface Water -stained leaves Water Marks, Elevation Local Soil Survey Data ' _ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits FAC - Neutral Test Hydrology Criterion Met? _.X- Yes —No Other Observations w40i - 1,z� - WETLAND DETERMINATION ' Is the Sample Point in Wetland Yes , X No _ Undetermined _ Distance from Delineated Edae �ft. N/A n t _ Notes 1 ,J (t/"rb, i q LA -1 a _ t SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES Wetlands Inventory & Delineation • Fisheries • Wildlife • Natural Communities Site Name: Doewood Road Site Date: 05-21.97 BasinVarea: i Sample Point ID: . u — UP Investigators: Michael Fishman & Julie Sherlock Fishman Community Type: LtJEi- PY1@n Am,) Disturbed Condition? Yes X No Nature of Disturbance: d /a i n e, ( eLl 4t. - VEGETATION Hydric Soil Present? ,Y Yes _ No _ undetermined Notes HYDROLOGY Depth of sampling Inches _ Inundated, Depth of Water Free water in borehole, Depth from Surface plo7" Water Marks, Elevation _ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits Hydrology Criterion Met? _Yes „4—No Other Observations no In Am V0IoA Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Water -stained leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC - Neutral Test WETLAND DETERMINATION Is the Sample Point in Wetland Yes _ No/ Undetermined Distance from Delineated Edge _,ft. N/A_ Notes 0A ( f A 2 4 ; (V I tEw I A N -e -'t VL 0 I. C'f Dominants (>2o%+basal oraerial coverage) Non -dominants ' ecie Stratum Indicator Status Species Stratum Indicator Status t PkLt to V15 QV v'A'. pL/Lt ®V S T FA/.tA/+ H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T H V S T HV S T H V S T >50% of Dominants FAC - or wetter •.Z Yes _ No >50% of Dominants FACW, OBL(FAC-neutral test) _Yes _No _N/A Notes SOILS County Soil Survey Map Unit Carver County. Minnesots Sheet No 19 Jy Soil Series is on National Hydric Soil List Arca mapped as depression or wet spot on Soil Survey Field Observations — Hydric soil assumed because plants are OBL and FACW and wetland boundary is abrupt _Y Mineral Soil _ Organic Soil 1 Horizon/Depth Matrix Colo Texture Features �J: ih i 4y / jr r• Hydric Soil Present? ,Y Yes _ No _ undetermined Notes HYDROLOGY Depth of sampling Inches _ Inundated, Depth of Water Free water in borehole, Depth from Surface plo7" Water Marks, Elevation _ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits Hydrology Criterion Met? _Yes „4—No Other Observations no In Am V0IoA Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Water -stained leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC - Neutral Test WETLAND DETERMINATION Is the Sample Point in Wetland Yes _ No/ Undetermined Distance from Delineated Edge _,ft. N/A_ Notes 0A ( f A 2 4 ; (V I tEw I A N -e -'t VL 0 I. C'f I SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES Wetlands Inventory & Delineation • Fisheries e Wildlife • Natural CommunirieS Sita NenN: BuinVlrca; Investigators: j�P6 JLJo Disturbed Condition? Yes No� Nawta of Dittalimce: Dow. Stemple Point ID: Cammunity Type' F/ '✓ <'i i+rrrY VEGETATION Dominants L2o%- bmal or earlst coverage) Vars �onW et os &marl�nd �irkiNe�S p(,rJ,VSYLY.�N�CA H V 5 H V S T H V 5 T H V S T HVST H/VST %SOA/. of Dominants FAC -or wcmc ! Ym _ No iSC%. of I LJ 1 I I Notes County Solt Survey Aiap Unit NSP-dominanSS SOCSla r rndianta Sruug t /i w ,r yte. r t V S T Ste_ �✓isa J_otitcl.M4PVST _ H V S V-) —y H V S T� H V S T H V S T HVST Dominams FAM, OBL (FAC•neutrAl test) —Yes —No —N/A , k / SOILS _ Soll Sencs is on Na tonal Hydric Soil Lias Ara mappe4 r depressltm or wet spot on Soil Survey FycicIQL "zoom _ Hydtio ,nil assumed be=" platy me DBL and FACW and wciland boundary is Abrupt _ Z Mineral Soil _ Dt:anic Solt - H rvD Matrix o or TtxtNa r. Hydric Soil Present! _Yes _ No _Undetermined Now Yes —No . � ��1. t r- � y - .J -ry HYDROLOGY Dxldiud haat in uppe 12 aches Depth. oe sampline _� manes _ Irwndamd. Depth of Water e G ns in Wiiels DrALnage Pxacry m Wanends ^Free wattt in barcholq Depth Qnm Surfaee�,��I! �WAtar-stsined',cavec Water Warks, Elevoaaa Local Soil Suety Data _ Dritt Lines mr Sediment Deposits FAC • NeuVal Tes[ Hy Cro!ogy':nterion Met^ t, Yes —No . � ��1. t r- � y - .J -ry c -t- '�- 0[htr Obse-va:iora --.. e G w-ETLAND DETERNUNATION J Wetland Is the Sample Point in Wend Yes +_'' `rat UndstammAd _ Dlstancc Sao Delineated Edge SIL NtA— Cbe I e! 1 v.t e r Nous 7_0 39t'd 30dfYi_3L� M'2 7CI09C.^S c0F0?C-7T9 :'. o:L' -SE '.'LZ!S0 I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I Meld Observation, Hynec mil usumed because ptanu ere OBL and PAC W and *,Wand boundaryit abrupt �Sdinetai Soil Orgmie Son _ Features ' Horizon/Denth Manioc Color .ga _ Te aura Hylic Soil ?r=zit? '�Yc No _ ;htdaramt4wd Notes 1; t , HYDROLOGY Depot ofsampling 7 l"bee __. Iflundmed, Depth of Water,t Free water in borehole, Depth Som Surface %� Water Msrvs, latvanon On8 Lines or Sediment Deposits Hvdiologv Criterion Mm?Yes _No ether Obs itloae /+t_ .1. OzidtZed P.aet C!unnels In UDPm 1? Medica Dtninaga Pm m. s in W'cdande Water-stoinad leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC - Neuual Test WETLAND DETERNUNATION Is the Sample Point in W W and Yee —k—^o _ Undetermined Dlmanee Rem Delineated EdSc �t, Nhk, Notes S -'1 r•0 36"'d irdiYlS�J L�3 TQ4dLG cBt'6:G7L :9 ca :[: ceE'%_C/d SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES Wetlands Inventory & Delineation Fisheries • Wildlife • Natural Communities /. /b• � /t Data �•�i�7�> /19,� Site Nome: //'' j r cAr BaainlAmw .rte- •i Sample Point ID. ir,Y-sttptoes: J•�/O. Community Type: d 4 x r A.�, Mentrbed Condition? Nawn of Disturbance: !1l fc 4"..4 VEGETATION cso K et�rr Dominance (.,20%+ b" or xrlal rdvcmgo) ` Non -dominants SepsiiSsitillin FFrlysT Indirsnt Sums Utwu -%.r Indicator 5 mua Ac od+ �ttntat���H '- l� HVST .- HVST HVST HVST HVST HV5T H V 5 T H V S T HVST H V S T HVST HVST >50%of Dominmv FAC - or wetter _' Yee No >So°/. of Dominmts FACW. OBL (FAC•ne=al rsst) _ Yes _`10 _N/A Notes SODS r County Soil Snrvay Map Unit Soil Series is on wtlonel Hydric sail List Area mapped as depression Of wa spot on Son Surrey Meld Observation, Hynec mil usumed because ptanu ere OBL and PAC W and *,Wand boundaryit abrupt �Sdinetai Soil Orgmie Son _ Features ' Horizon/Denth Manioc Color .ga _ Te aura Hylic Soil ?r=zit? '�Yc No _ ;htdaramt4wd Notes 1; t , HYDROLOGY Depot ofsampling 7 l"bee __. Iflundmed, Depth of Water,t Free water in borehole, Depth Som Surface %� Water Msrvs, latvanon On8 Lines or Sediment Deposits Hvdiologv Criterion Mm?Yes _No ether Obs itloae /+t_ .1. OzidtZed P.aet C!unnels In UDPm 1? Medica Dtninaga Pm m. s in W'cdande Water-stoinad leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC - Neuual Test WETLAND DETERNUNATION Is the Sample Point in W W and Yee —k—^o _ Undetermined Dlmanee Rem Delineated EdSc �t, Nhk, Notes S -'1 r•0 36"'d irdiYlS�J L�3 TQ4dLG cBt'6:G7L :9 ca :[: ceE'%_C/d I I I SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESO yetiands Inventory & Delineation • Fisheries 91ildlife • Natural Communities siuName: Bastr(Lkr yi &' d fl Sm oat Potnt Io- 4 il�'di •,A l� I FL i, * F :J•% Irwactipmrs: ,T2ri.< CEtiP Community Typo: ,�.�:.'iA /7 ✓Y ./:t.f�'(er:�.� Disturbed Canditlon7 Yes 1Jo _ FF/�/if /;,t. 47 Nature of Dls[urbanc::S r� • ' F / " ? � A 0 VEGETATION Dominants Cr10%bwi or serisd wm mw) S,M^,.. C d.Ja.e E fro—s% ill!licaeor Status A�rr?,/rj./',n re*,7S T GAra H v 5 T H V 5 T H V S T HVST H v S T H V S T Non -dominantsr J In ie••n.e „ a(C �Ir A k9 V? / vST � �vsT v L caerU: ,ra K H v&ex ACw— (fiJ (''r^;U/n 'Irye. a4 ®V 5 T P- ,/!& Lt HVST— K VST H V S T >50% of Dominants FAL • or wetter _Yes Z,40 >dOM of Dominants FACW, OBL (FAC-nesaral test) _YM _No —WA, Nous G le, -..,r.-a.. �%r /1rx �[I hl.��.+ SOILS County Soil Survey Map Unit Soil Series is on National Hydric Sol List Area mapped a depression or wee spot on Soil Survey Field Ohservatons Hydric soil assumed becuse plants am OBL and FACW end wetland boundsay u abrupt Mineral Soil _ orgsac Soil Matrix Color r✓ .xe.�•�.. sr sr� Fezcurea � ,vi rJi , dirt r x 11�rti Y 't�'j Q, if -647 Hydric Soil Preseat? _6eYu —No_ Tintimined ps,f�ya Homs ' •' >•R 3/ /f HYDROLOGY Depth o: sampling -2�- Inches _ Ot6dind Roo: Chaanela in Upper 13 mUes Inundated, Depth of Water _ Drafting: PIMM in Wetlands / __ Five water in borehMe, Depth fiom Surfiane A'Y L' C' __ Wausr•nained leaves •r° ^ `J _. WSW.Marks, Elevation Lxai Soil Survey Daa (~' -'� I• Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits FAC • Neutral'Ten Hydrology Criterion Mal _Yas ✓Na Other Observation /I a +'..,� A- , r i D /r /za •� "� �ro.N"^1a•••V• WETLAND DETERNIINATION It the Sample Poinc in Wetland Yes Vo C%llndaurrnined _, Distance from Delineated Edge _1t NIA__ Naas •� 3 eJ/B v - e n..r,� — 50 394d =18MSMI 003 WIDOWS -9 251L' cEE:/Li.%5© CITY OF MEMORANDUM CIIMSEN TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner 7700 Market Boulevard FROM: Matt Saam, Assistant City EngineerAO PO Box 147 serve their development. Through negotiations with the City, Westwood has Chanhassen, MN 55317 Park a Recreation paying for the cost difference or oversizing of the road. Phone: 952.227.1120 DATE: June 8, 2004 Administration GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL Phone: 952.227.1 too Fax 952.227.1110 SUBJ: Site Plan Review of Westwood Church Parking Lot Expansion and Phone: 952.227.1400 the Extension of W. 78'9 Street Building Inspections additional parking lot on the north side of the site and the other is for the Land Use Review File No. 04-05 Phone: 952227.1180 Natural Resources area was previously rough graded with the original Westwood Church project. Fax: 952.227.1190 The applicant is now proposing to finish grade the area for paving. At the south Fax: 952.227.1110 Engineering Upon review of the plans dated May 14, 2004, prepared by Pioneer Engineering, I P:952.227170 Fax: Fax:952.227.1170 offer the following comments and recommendations. It should be noted that the owg extension of W. 78b Street will be a public/private partnership. Westwood Finance Church is only required to build a 26 -foot wide driveway with curb and gutter to Phone: serve their development. Through negotiations with the City, Westwood has agreed to upgrade their proposed access to a 31 -foot public street with the City Park a Recreation paying for the cost difference or oversizing of the road. Phone: 952.227.1120 Arboretum. Fax: 952.227.1110 GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 The grading for this site can be broken into two separate operations: one is for the Fax 952227.1404 additional parking lot on the north side of the site and the other is for the Planning & extension of W. 78`9 Street at the south end of the site. The additional parking Natural Resources area was previously rough graded with the original Westwood Church project. Phone: 952.227.1130 The applicant is now proposing to finish grade the area for paving. At the south Fax: 952.227.1110 end of the site, the entire south property line will be graded for the extension of Public works W. 78t9 Street from Highway 41. In addition, two driveways will be graded to the 1591 Park Road north of W. 7881 Street for access to the new road. The applicant will also be Phone: 995227.1310➢ Fax 952.227.1310 grading for the construction of a new and and wetland mitigation area. grg P Senior center To avoid significant grading into the Landscape Arboretum's property at the Phone: 952227.1125 Fax: 952227.1110 , ranging southeast corner of the site, a retainingwalln in height from 4' to 9', is proposed. A permit for the proposed retaining wall is required to be obtained Web site from the Building Department and the wall must be designed by a registered www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us structural engineer. Even with the wall, there is a small amount of grading that is proposed on the northeast corner of the Arboretum's property. This off-site grading will require a temporary easement or right -of -entry agreement from the Arboretum. Should earthwork quantities not balance on site and materials need to be imported or exported from the site, the developer will need to supply the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval by staff. In addition, if material is proposed to be exported to another location in Chanhassen, it should be noted that The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding (rails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Bob Generous June 8, 2004 Page 2 the properties would be required to obtain an earthwork permit from the City. All areas disturbed as a result of construction related activity must be sodded and/or seeded and disc mulched within two weeks of disturbance. Drainage from the new parking lot will be conveyed via storm sewer to an existing public pond off the northeast comer of the site. This existing pond has been previously sized for the additional impervious drainage so no further improvements are required. A new pond at the south end of the site is proposed to treat a large majority of the drainage from the new public street, private driveways and future parking lots on the church property. The pond will discharge the treated stormwater to the existing wetland just east of the pond. This wetland then drains south into the Arboretum's property. The outlet rate from this wetland is required to be the same or less than the existing flowrate of stormwater onto the Arboretum's property. The eastern 300 feet of new West 78`h Street is proposed to drain to the Highway 41 ditch at the northwest corner of the intersection. This will require a MnDOT drainage permit. In addition, an NPDES permit and Watershed district permit will be required for the project grading. Drainage calculations for the existing and proposed conditions including the 10 - and 100 -year runoff rates along with storm sewer sizing data has been submitted for staff review. Staff has reviewed the calculations and found that only minor modifications are needed. Drainage and utility easements will be required over the wetland, pond, and the adjacent mitigation areas. An easement for access purposes will also be required for future maintenance of the wetlands. Erosion control measures and site restoration must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Staff recommends that the City's type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to all existing wetlands and ponds. In addition, erosion control blankets should be used on all slopes 3:1 or greater with heights of 6' or more. With no building expansion being proposed at this time, no utility improvements are proposed except for a short watermain extension under new W. 78'h Street at the southeast corner of the site. This watermain is meant for future development purposes. STREETS/ACCESS As a condition of approval for the development of the original Westwood Church project, a second driveway access at the intersection of W. 78`h Street was required to be constructed prior to any further development of the site. As such, Westwood Church is now proposing to construct a secondary access to the site Bob Generous June 8, 2004 Page 3 with the expansion of their parking area. To accomplish this, Westwood Church has acquired the two properties at the southeast comer of their site. As previously mentioned, City staff and Westwood have come to an agreement to upgrade the proposed access from a 26 -foot wide driveway to a 31 -foot wide public street. The City is in favor of having a public street for a few reasons: it will provide an alternate access for church traffic to exit the site, it will provide a future access for the development of the property (Carlson/Brandt) west of the church's site, and it will provide a secondary access for the Dogwood Road residents in the future. The extension of W. 78th Street is proposed as a 31 -foot wide public street with concrete curb and gutter. The street has been shown within an 80 -foot easement. A 10 -foot wide bituminous trail is also included to provide pedestrian/bike access from future development to the west. The proposed trail will connect with the existing trail system on the east side of Highway 41. A financial security will be required to guarantee installation of the public improvements. In 2001, when staff was previously considering the extension of W.78th Street, the Landscape Arboretum expressed no interest in the project or of having the road on their property. Because of this, the entire length of the proposed W. 78th Street extension has been shown on the Church's property. This also necessitates the re- alignment of the existing W. 78th Street/Highway 41 intersection on the east side of the highway. The existing intersection does not line up with the proposed extension of W. 78th Street. All of the necessary intersection and tum lane improvements will be completed with this project. The City has retained the services of a traffic engineer to look at the proposed intersection layout and ensure that it will operate effectively based on the ultimate development of the area. Staff hopes to have the results of this traffic study in time for the June 15, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. As previously mentioned, Westwood Church is required to construct a 26 -foot wide driveway with concrete curb and gutter, per City Code. The proposed access driveway to the existing church site from W. 78th Street is labeled as a "Temporary Parking Drive" that is 24 feet wide with no curb and gutter. It is staffs understanding that the church intends to expand within the next five years but that there are no specific plans for future building locations and/or elevations. As such, staff would recommend that bituminous curb and gutter be added to the temporary driveway. Additionally, a condition should be included with this approval that prior to any future building expansion to the west side of the existing church building, the temporary access driveway from W. 78th Street will be brought up to current standards in effect at the time. Bob Generous June 8, 2004 Page 4 RECOMMENDED CONDITONS OF APPROVAL 1. All final plans must be signed by a registered civil engineer. 2. Use the latest version (2004) of the City's Standard Detail Plates. 3. The twin storm sewer culverts under W. 78th Street must be RCP Class 5. 4. The existing driveway from Highway 41 to the existing homes in the northwest comer of the W.78t' Street intersection must be removed and seeded or sodded. 5. Include concrete driveway agrons and pedestrian ramps for both proposed driveways off of new W. 78 Street. 6. The new painted median for the eastbound W. 78th Street traffic on the east side of Highway 41 must be a raised concrete median with pedestrian ramps. 7. Install a temporary turnaround with barricades and a sign stating "This street to be extended" at the west end of new W. 78th Street. 8. Provide a pedestrian ramp at the northeast comer of the new W. 78th Street/Highway 41 intersection for connection to the future city trail. 9. Incorporate the conditions of the MnDOT review letter dated June 1, 2004 into the plans. 10. Show all of the proposed grades for the new driveway to the existing home in the southeast corner of the site. 11. A permit for the proposed retaining wall is required to be obtained from the Building Department and the wall must be designed by a registered structural engineer. 12. Off-site grading will require a temporary easement or right -of -entry agreement from the Arboretum. 13. Should earthwork quantities not balance on site and materials need to be imported or exported from the site, the developer will need to supply the City with a detailed haul route for review and approval by staff. In Bob Generous June 8, 2004 Page 5 jms addition, if material is proposed to be exported to another location in Chanhassen, it should be noted that the properties would be required to obtain an earthwork permit from the City. 14. All areas disturbed as a result of construction related activity must be sodded and/or seeded and disc mulched within two weeks of disturbance. 15. A MnDOT drainage permit will be required. In addition, an NPDES permit and Watershed district permit will be required for the project grading. 16. Drainage and utility easements will be required over the wetland, pond, and the adjacent mitigation areas. An easement for access purposes will also be required for future maintenance of the wetlands. 17. Erosion control measures and site restoration must be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Staff recommends that the City's type II silt fence, which is a heavy duty fence, be used adjacent to all existing wetlands and ponds. In addition, erosion control blankets should be used on all slopes 3:1 or greater with heights of 6' or more. 18. A financial security will be required to guarantee installation of the public improvements. 19. Bituminous curb and gutter must be added to the temporary driveway. 20. Prior to any future building expansion to the west side of the existing church building, the temporary access driveway from W. 78a' Street must be brought up to current standards in effect at the time. Paul Oehme, City Engineer/Dir. of Public Works g:\eng\projects\westwood chmh\spr & extensionAoc * PIONEER engineering .M. 0 25 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET GRADING LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED -902- DESCRIPTION CATCH BASIN MANHOLE FLARED END BEEHIVE EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER FUTURE STORM SEWER PERFORATED DRAIN TILE EASEMENT LINE EXISTING 2' CONTOUR LINE EXISTING 10' CONTOUR LINE PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR LINE PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR LINE PiKww'0 POND OUTLET LINE ---°0°� --- POND HIGH WATER LINE CITY OF CHANHASSEN $ X? PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION RECEIVED ♦ ♦ ♦ EMERGENCY OVERFLOW MAY 14 2004 " " E " " 00 "' ■ EROSION CONTROL FENCE 00000000 WALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT lc�t e Community Deveiepment Dept. 104049 -FINAL -H YD. D WG O • D -902- DESCRIPTION CATCH BASIN MANHOLE FLARED END BEEHIVE EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER FUTURE STORM SEWER PERFORATED DRAIN TILE EASEMENT LINE EXISTING 2' CONTOUR LINE EXISTING 10' CONTOUR LINE PROPOSED 2' CONTOUR LINE PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR LINE PiKww'0 POND OUTLET LINE ---°0°� --- POND HIGH WATER LINE CITY OF CHANHASSEN $ X? PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION RECEIVED ♦ ♦ ♦ EMERGENCY OVERFLOW MAY 14 2004 " " E " " 00 "' ■ EROSION CONTROL FENCE 00000000 WALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT lc�t e Community Deveiepment Dept. 104049 -FINAL -H YD. D WG I t � !I �;yii~iak ! ;pint! 11 ci!L,.,�, � I 11 4i� �, 1 1' '�•, iI , — I !i 11�!!iNry'c!1! 311�rM!! ij 11!1!!li';YI?: j 1, 1�EI!!j111 I I!ii11 U11 ! i;u': ! If Il t'I��Ijll i111 if ! pit. jll r 1 i t I i �i.N SII ! I ;• III N y.! UII,{u �H!r �; pyo l?Is.i I Ie !s` { ! !1 ! I I If 11!jI!I!�!all,S•jIU11;!i±lll�!I{fr!n!IyL��!�IJII �Ij' EI!il!l'jlp!��II! !i �situNNullEili!lui�'! �tlNll�Ei>>li4uii�7 II! - a 11 'o vb Z 4 i c py VI ( O I t� i I WWRSP.WRd.°°" LOCATION MAP_ _I I®'a �IHI COVER SHEET I WESTD COMMUNITY CHURCH I�WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH I"°T 1 10 WOOseen WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH GRADING, UTILITY & STREET CONSTRUCTION PLANS _ CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX 1. COVER SHEET/SITE PLAN wr„we 2. STORM SEWER xcn auuuy 1..ower, .. 1. s' 3. STORM SEWER ® �""• _ "'-- __ \ NETT i.. TIXFEr 4. STREET CONSTRUCTION n6T lam Sr5[FI o .+... — 5. STREET CONSTRUCTION nFTT lel. T11EFf 6. STREET CONSTRUCTION 7. PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION �u....wn®�� 8. CONSTRUCTION Esu ---wf®v .w ...�.o�w �u.< _ _______ ' leee rewyNm 10. G-1 wwTURN ssLLlLwaA 9. TURN LANE STRIPING xNr IT, annr DETAILS GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL �s w G-2 G-3 LS GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN I WWRSP.WRd.°°" LOCATION MAP_ _I I®'a �IHI COVER SHEET I WESTD COMMUNITY CHURCH I�WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH I"°T 1 10 WOOseen UUP/�,�'�y(�(���� w 0 mutt. I:\ I n20 �61.1.—s.. I:II)I) .tin.♦ �._ -'. v000nw,w 100 o � r i • � 970 l .awM :_ee _— u➢5 ` anxn cqm xo mutt. I:\ I n20 �61.1.—s.. I:II)I) .tin.♦ �._ -'. ' 100 vm cif �f x L. ( r 15., � 970 l .awM u➢5 ` anxn cqm xo Ti IpIS � P^OIVGO �- IPw ' STORM SEWER WESTNOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH WESTWOCO COMMUNITY CHURCH 'Q` 2 l0 �� 1010 o) . 6R ir, •o.n � .. , 1'05 ne0 k 990 1000 �61.1.—s.. I:II)I) .tin.♦ �._ v, i n75 vm cif �f x 970 l � P^OIVGO �- IPw ' STORM SEWER WESTNOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH WESTWOCO COMMUNITY CHURCH 'Q` 2 l0 bTM IIPas> eRR•IYx WARNI a • mm.w o • Y,xnY ♦ nm mc.Rn nm wY ucmY w( STORM SEWR CMSM OON NOME 1.4Y Ilnull W_M A /IFliO.d [Ol4 M,LL L auOlvY � � m� ✓9a u n¢ wm ssc Ta E �'uIL roerratisxg2er:.x Ra�':a 1 ice, v ZEaI a f.� SigiY SEMQI SQi01UlE ux> snnicr. Mf°µ n Mnan sa �`S1°110. RONU W T CONI .i. N �j� r Y s� .. yu ii[ 'vnwoxo nnoi inat�o ` YIY ( / EYRTYG UI4lN0 FZS )F Y fLm f W S i/ InnAI n T `Ffl er nnv w/2omma �Ac �'w/ [ s�q w xn r. nit J jde a't '10 9w 1 I. IL -; w�. nk STORM SEWER WESTW000 COMMUNITY CHURCH WESTW000 COMMUNITY CHURCH " 3 nI, 10 ai k 3 1015 IDIo Ions woo ' I-nl ` YIY ( / EYRTYG UI4lN0 FZS )F Y fLm f W S i/ InnAI n T `Ffl er nnv w/2omma �Ac �'w/ [ s�q w xn r. nit J jde a't '10 9w 1 I. IL -; w�. nk STORM SEWER WESTW000 COMMUNITY CHURCH WESTW000 COMMUNITY CHURCH " 3 nI, 10 ¢ es nSxem �(e'e..0 erwnmw) w"e.ip w m [Etl i� w�:.elw rwao r) w ]eTH sm[[r tl NEST 78TH STREET WEST 78TH STREET STREET CONSTRUCTON I *STWOM COMMUNITY CHURCH I ZE OOD COMMUNITY CHURCH 1— 4 12 W 7MsMLEI lor. WEST 78TH STREET l oo� 9P5 WEST 78TH STREET e 9P0 i. lon 3 s --:JM INTL IT IT. '..._900..1 rum rum rum rum ii.w ii.�.. .,.w iowm um' um um um r.sn r.m un erwe 1 0� v MMT CONSTRUCTION WEsT W COMMUNITY CHURCH NEsl W COMMUNITY CHURCH ' 5 10 mms WEST 78TH STREET e lon 3 --:JM .1 10.1.5I� ITT 11 IT 11 .�r'IV I 1000.: '..._900..1 rum rum rum rum ii.w ii.�.. .,.w iowm um' um um um r.sn r.m un erwe 1 0� v MMT CONSTRUCTION WEsT W COMMUNITY CHURCH NEsl W COMMUNITY CHURCH ' 5 10 mms \ \ '\. eelz couasrz mPe .uv alrzn 1 \ � � -� \ PMItIH] IDi P.1Y91d1 YlTgl i i II I 1 � 1 wz+0 sa aro s amu ` 1 II ` 1 �\ n s •ulml\ SO \ n •arra �� L� or.Ps:u. a I 1 u. y aION�P pOr>' a PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION WESTWOOD COMMUNItt CHURCH NESTNbOD CdAMUNiTY CHURCH am � s la aa,s '-1/3' T➢E 4v % XEµMC [LUR3E YIYRRE IY4XEY'A]MI FIK TI Tr4 lV ] �_KMIXC CpM4 W%NRE 1 W�yW591 YFMWO CtlMY W%NXE (L 1 11 YfAREI.IF B.15E gA33 3 (SEC. 3]11) >XMTIFXi X/.RX FM XESf /]1N S1PEFr I rn� �Knr Vxn lml ]A'RE� RC1! YLdfm qll® k(AIrRA t mm. rmu anx mr mw { STATE m ur m NRNWAY NQ 41 r.o. m osc n.ele m ur.e. was�...°W rol oox h rmv. mlrr mr m ur.°�9ic eeai�� � r m uivew wea ur. rwo r xe roa mm ra..w r m ur.xr. mr mr „" . oom. mr.ew . mue x. Im wort mm ww uo.e o1mo� memo r.mee aoMeeu P�oiJ®n °101' _ TURN LANE STRIPING NESTNOCO COMMUNITY CHURCH WESTWOOO COMMUNITY CHURCH ii em C7t6y` 1 i ago PECESIMnu CIAIm CURB nnuP i'ar•� �nmmi C4SIId' Y�r � C�3kL4Y' CINIIIIw Y, .�`� ev— 'r W-29 I 1 ■ I dlr au111m I P 720N DETAILS m WESTAWD COMMUNITY CHURCH PWRB tlE3 I IMI COMMUNITY CHURCH . 10 j 10 I dlr au111m I P 720N DETAILS m WESTAWD COMMUNITY CHURCH PWRB tlE3 I IMI COMMUNITY CHURCH . 10 j 10 p�A IY IM A.. IMAYS .. a swAf ef.orzi w s +i fe.a ITA— A.KATTTT w aiML R i.N, rt W. xR..f n ewm rm .q[. DTWIi,i@.Y xRli .Vrtxm �. 4aK umf Mffl t°A ITIAGaa[iss�.o onax[tvw a n.im, me. vy ^rt U) All ueDira+rt n TI— TT �..0>a.. .1 [mxo a m2 °AA GRADING LEGEND anRo e.Am oou.�A. IA 0 o i e � •oAo.+'°°P w."°',f ..... • SWAM Aa...._, •a.•«. �. epi r• V+ -Y..amw 4+a °nwi wnbc =moi ....11T• mw.vnwrw.rt d An.-Am.Ti a uw BONYIN v pgprl mlll\ '1[ vYPVrt f2Pz�T'� 9'C GRADING LEGEND All otscenxw f2Pz�T'� 9'C GRADING LEGEND om�xe nuam 0 otscenxw i �.. / ':..::. ....,n I' �. _—•` 16'1(1 w� v too .ter" •... "..A'T�'L.::R� I b \ ` — � \\ k GRADING LEGEND \ rrow ---- rworo:m wr MIA wmcs\ "rinrvr iww. e..e_ae1p1oi -', `..n ,. ..... .................... ... �•..,� •,... ml� +m ^.� GRADING. DRANIAGE k ... �'�� =uT'^ �•� �-�• EROSION CONTROL PUN NESTW CDNMUNIW CHURCH WESTWOOp COMMUNITY CHURCH 'a' G -D 3 °"•"° 000--ii- ��� _CONTROL POINT Nc rSET PK NAIL mws I PI. MG DETW LANMAPE NOTE LANDSCAPE PLAN CHURCH I— ES i I & �tq ■m §,§i¥® R /iA \ B § |i' §� � §� � � §� � .i Bmf ymlt Qiib+e [ |� |\ .� § � [ PIONEER ENGINEERING, P.A. PLEASE RESPOND TO: ® 2422 ENTERPRISE DRIVE ❑ 625 HIGHWAY 10 NE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN BLAINE, MN 55434 55120 PHONE: (763) 783-1880 PHONE: (651) 681-1914 FAX: (763) 783-1883 FAX: (651) 681-9488 TO: Chanhassen, City of 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 CORRESPONDENCE SENT VIA: MAIL ❑ FAX LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 3, 2004 JOB NO. 104049 ATTENTION: Lori Haak RE: Westwood Church PAGES INCLUDING TRANSMITTAL ® OTHER 2 H Men COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 6 Revisedreplacement plan THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW ® FOR APPROVAL ❑ FOR YOUR USE AS REQUESTED ❑ FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT 54=1y -1m, Lori We removed the PVC on the existing treatment basin and are shoening that PVC as buffer around the new wetland Please give Bill Bleckwenn or myself a call if you need any more reports or any questions Thanks Done COPY TO: SIGNED: Doug Stahl IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 10417 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD, SUITE TWO / HOPKINS, MN 55343 / (952) 238-1667 / FAX (952) 238-1671 June 30, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: PURPOSE Matt Saam, P.E., City of Chanhassen Edward F. Terhaar and David C. May Refer to File: 04-42 Results of Traffic Impact Study for the Proposed Westwood Community Church Access Modification and Future Expansion in Chanhassen, MN The purpose of this memorandum is to present the results of our traffic impact study for the proposed extension of West 78h Street to the west of Minnesota Trunk Highway 41 (TH 41) in Chanhassen, Minnesota. Of particular concern are the potential impacts to the intersection of TH 41 and West 78h Street by a proposed driveway access to the Westwood Community Church (located northwest ofthe subject intersection). This memorandum is intended to act as a supplement to the original traffic study for the church dated July 6, 2001. A map of the study area is shown in Figure 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Westwood Community Church Characteristics Westwood Community Church is currently accessed via Tanadoona Drive off of TH 41. Tanadoona Drive intersects TH 41 approximately 1,300 feet north of West 78b Street, and approximately 2,900 feet north of TH 5. Minnesota State Patrol officers provide traffic control assistance during the Sunday morning peak hours at the intersection of TH 41 and Tanadoona Drive. At the time of the original study, the church assumed that 1,000 people would attend the 9:30 AM service, and that 1,500 people would attend the 11:00 AM service. Current information from the church reveals that both services have approximately 1,000 attendees. It should be noted that the attendance figures for the church include adults, children, and teens. The original study also determined that the 2010 attendance would be 1,700 people for the 9:30 service, and 2,300 people for the 11:00 service. For the W. Matt Saam -2- June 30, 2004 purposes of this study, the 9:30 attendance figure is still deemed valid, however, both services are now assumed to have equal attendance of 1,700 people. Other Future Nearby Development The City of Chanhassen has confirmed that 40 new single-family residential homes are to be built that will access West 78`h Street west of TH 41. In addition, 16 new residential townhouses are to be built that will access West 786, Street on the east side of TH 41. Projected volumes from these two developments need to be included in any subsequent traffic analysis. Existine Roadway Characteristics TH 41 (Hazletine Boulevard) is a two-lane, north -south roadway, with paved shoulders on both sides. It is classified as an A -minor arterial (expander) within the study area. The posted speed limit on TH 41 is 55 mph. Field observations reveal that prevailing vehicle speeds are at or near the posted speed limit, except in incidences where the southbound queue for the TH 5 signalized intersection extend near the West 7e Street intersection. At the West 78'h Street intersection, a dedicated right -tum lane exists for northbound traffic and a dedicated left -turn lane exists for southbound traffic. West 78th Street is a recently constructed residential street connecting TH 41 to Century Boulevard and Galpin Boulevard (Carver County Road 117) to the east. The roadway is divided approaching TH 41. The westbound approach is 28 feet wide (curb face to curb face) and marked with dedicated right- and left -tum lanes at TH 41. The eastbound departure from TH 41 is 20 feet wide (curb face to curb face). At 78'h, dedicated right -turn lane for northbound; dedicated left -tum lane for southbound. Planned dedicated tum lanes for west -turning traffic. Existing Traffic Volumes In order to better understand the existing traffic conditions, traffic volume data was collected on TH 41 at both West 78th Street and Tanadoona Drive. Data was collected from Thursday, June 17, 2004 to Sunday, June 20, 2004. The collected data is presented later in this report. Observations at the intersection during the weekday AM & PM peak periods indicate that the southbound TH 41 queue at the TH 5 signalized intersection extended back to West 78th Street on multiple occasions, even extending beyond West 780, Street at times. This condition definitely hinders traffic operations at the TH 41 /West 78th Street intersection. Mr. Matt Saam -3- June 30, 2004 CITY OF CHANHASSEN TRAFFIC STUDY FOR FIGURE 1 WWWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH STUDY IN �BENSrW &ASSOCIATES, IrC. nwvartAnorewi�+u�on,�uee� � > Mr. Matt Saam -4- June 30, 2004 TRAFFIC FORECASTS Trip Generation For purposes of this study, 2005 church traffic volumes were assumed to be the same as the existing Sunday traffic volumes at the intersection of TH 41 and Tanadoona Drive. Based on the projected future church service attendance in 2010 (1,700 attendees for each of two services), the existing traffic volumes were multiplied by a factor of 1.7. Three "peak" hours were determined for Sunday traffic volumes, in order to evaluate the following scenarios: • Traffic entering the church for the early service • Traffic leaving the church from the early service and traffic entering the church for the later service • Traffic leaving the church from the later service For the proposed residential developments, trip generation was based on the expected number of dwelling units for each development, based on guidelines established in the 7th Edition of Trip Generation published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The total number of trips generated are shown in Table 1 below. Table 1 Expected Trip Generation for West 78`h Street Residential Developments Land Use Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour In Out In Out 40 Single-family houses est side of TH 41 10 28 30 17 16 Townhouses (East side of TH 41 2 10 9 5 Sunday Sunday Sunday Land Use 8:45 — 9:45 10:30 —11:30 12:00 —1:00 In Out In Out In Out 40 Single-family houses est side of TH 41 12 11 22 20 23 21 16 Townhouses 2 2 4 4 4 4 (East side of TH 41 Trip Distribution Since it can be assumed that virtually all of the Sunday morning traffic turning at the intersection of TH 41 and Tanadoona Drive is church traffic, church trip distribution was based on the existing Sunday turning movements. In addition, after the new West 78th Street access has been completed, it was estimated that 75% of vehicles approaching from the north on TH 41 would continue to use the Tanadoona Drive access, while 75% Mr. Matt Saam -5- June 30, 2004 of vehicles approaching from the other directions would use the new West 78h Street access. Residential trip distribution was based on existing travel patterns at the intersection of TH 41 and West 7801 Street. The trip distributions used for the residential developments are as follows: • 5% to and from the west via the West 780i Street extension • 15% to and from the south via TH 41 • 40% to and from the north via TH 41 • 40% to and from the east via either TH 41 and TH 5 (if traffic originated from the west), or via West 780' Street (if traffic originated from West 780' Street) Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes were developed for the intersection of TH 41 and West 7801 Street for the following scenarios: 1) 2005 (estimated completion of the new residential developments) and 2) 2010 (estimated completion of the church development). All of the forecasted volumes are based on the existing counts recorded at the intersection. A growth factor of 5% per year was added to the existing weekday volumes to arrive at 2005 and 2010 baseline volumes. An additional adjustment factor of 0.84 was added to the weekday volumes to correct for month and day -of -week factors. The expected post -development traffic was then added to the baseline, resulting in 2005 and 2010 post -development traffic volumes. The resultant volumes are shown in Figures 2 and 3. Mr. Matt Saam -6- June )I1. 2004 2005 VOLUMES a m Nm�m� v7� W. 78TH ST 3812% 212 �— 10113 *1 F" mina FTAM. PEAK (7:15.6:15) P.M. PEAK (4:45.5:45) XX= 2010 VOLUMES m a'e t5mN J 14 1419 - 20/12 N t NOT TO SCALE W. 78TH ST 4W/38 4— 1/3 ;-- 14116 CITY OF CHANHASSEN TRAFFIC STUDY FORIFIGURE 2 WESTWOOD EEKDAYA.MJP.M. COMMUNffY CHURCHEAK HOUR VOLUMES WBEMSHO� &ASNUKIM2 S, INC TXANIP9NTAPON 9101NEF118.N0 PlFN1EPt Mr. Matt Saam -7- June 30. 10) k N t NOT TO SCALE 2005 VOLUMES 4/8M � 1/11111 --i 6/242/219 W. 78TH ST 'L 18/15!18 7/17/113 2010 VOLUMES W. 78TH ST T— 9110/17 F— 26115/3 �— 7117/13 7Tr SUNDAY 8:45-9:45 A.M. SUNDAY 10:34-11:30 AM. SUNDAY 12 NOON -1:00 PM. CITY OF CHANHASSEN TRAFFIC STUDY FORFIGURE 3 WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH SUNDAYVOLUMES lwBENSH" & ASSOCIATES, INC. lA $PORTADCKB INUR1 ARO RARIEAI Mr. Matt Saam -8- June 30, 2004 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Level of Service The intersection of TH 41 and West 78b Street was analyzed to determine the impacts of traffic generated by construction of the proposed developments. Capacity analyses were performed using Highway Capacity Software (HCS) for all of the background traffic levels. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which range from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with very little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation, with excessive delay. The existing lane geometries and intersection control at the intersection of TH 41 and West 78h Street was used for the initial analysis, with modifications added to simulate appropriate traffic conditions after West 78`s Street is extended to the west. The lane geometries used for the analysis are as follows: • Southbound approach on TH 41: one dedicated left -tum lane, one through lane, and one dedicated right -turn lane. • Northbound approach on TH 41: one dedicated left -turn lane, one through lane, and one dedicated right -tum lane (free -right at the intersection). • Westbound approach on West 78's Street: one dedicated left -tum lane and one shared through/right-tum lane. The median is to be removed in order to realign the approach with the proposed extension. • Eastbound approach on West 78's Street: one dedicated left -tum lane and one shared through/right-turn lane. Table 5 on the following page presents the level of service analysis for the weekday AM and PM peak hours, and three Sunday peak periods: Mr. Matt Saam -9- June 30, 2004 Table 2 Intersection Level of Service Results at the Intersection of TH 41 and West 78`h Street As shown in Table 5, th westbound and eastbound left urns from West 780' Street experience poor levels o service during multiple time periods. The poor LOS for these movements at an unsignalized intersection is not desired, but it is also not uncommon. As shown in Figures 2 and 3, these movements consist of very low volumes. Therefore, in this situation, the poor LOS impacts very few motorists. As shown in Table 5, the highest volume movements all operate at acceptable levels of service. Traffic Signal Considerations When determining the appropriate intersection control, it is accepted practice that only weekday volumes are considered during traffic signal warrant analysis. The projected traffic volumes during the weekday AM and PM peak hours reveal that none of the warrants established under the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) have been met. This concurs with an April 2004 signal warrant analysis performed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. However, the projected Sunday traffic volumes at the intersection reveal that the peak hour volume warrant would be Tette Weekday 1 1 0000�0�0�0 TOPMULTAOM. Sunday ` 1 1 ©0©000�0�0 Sunday1 1 1 11 ©0©0�00��0 ----------- Sunday 11 11 11 ©000�000�0 1 1 ©000�0�0�0 As shown in Table 5, th westbound and eastbound left urns from West 780' Street experience poor levels o service during multiple time periods. The poor LOS for these movements at an unsignalized intersection is not desired, but it is also not uncommon. As shown in Figures 2 and 3, these movements consist of very low volumes. Therefore, in this situation, the poor LOS impacts very few motorists. As shown in Table 5, the highest volume movements all operate at acceptable levels of service. Traffic Signal Considerations When determining the appropriate intersection control, it is accepted practice that only weekday volumes are considered during traffic signal warrant analysis. The projected traffic volumes during the weekday AM and PM peak hours reveal that none of the warrants established under the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) have been met. This concurs with an April 2004 signal warrant analysis performed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. However, the projected Sunday traffic volumes at the intersection reveal that the peak hour volume warrant would be Tette Mr. Matt Saam -10- June 30, 2004 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon the analyses presented in this report, we have developed the following conclusions: • The intersection of TH 41 and West 78'" Street should be closely monitored after the new church access is opened. If a safety issue (i.e., high crash rate) arises at the intersection, additional intersection control measures can then be considered. • Currently, a Minnesota State Patrol officer assists with the direction of traffic at the intersection of TH 41 and Tanadoona Drive. With the relocation of church traffic to the intersection of TH 41 and West 78' Street, it may be necessary to employ another officer at this intersection during peak travel periods on Sundays. 51 To: G ..� G. Date: S S o y From: M C./L L ❑ FOR YOUR COMMENTS FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑ FOR YOUR APPROVAL NOTE & RETURN ❑ TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ❑ CALL ME ❑ SEE ME ❑ REPLY & SEND ME COPY COMMENTS: ❑ NOTE & FILE ❑ FOR YOUR SIGNATURE (7�T ,rs, �.) c ic� y C f ."j 0 Copynght 1%9, 1970—Laurel Office Ms. Inc., Bmwille, NY. 107M V.W. Eimicke Associates, Inc., BronMle, N.V. 10708 Tel. (914) 337-1900 • Fax (914) 337.1723 Distributed in Canada solely by V.W. Eimlcke Ltd., Paterbomugh, Ontano Tel (705) 7433202 • Fax (705) 7439994 PRIMED IN LISA Form OA -4 CIfYOF Date: May 3, 2004 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Robert Generous, Senior Planner Subject: Request for Site Plan Approval to expand the parking lot (143 spaces), and a Wetland Alteration Permit to alter and fill wetlands on site on property zoned Office and Institutional District, OI, located at 3121 Westwood Drive (west of TH 41 at Tanadoona Drive), Westwood Community Church. Planning Case: 04-20 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on April 30, 2004. The 60 -day review period ends June 29, 2004. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations conceming the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concemed so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on June 1, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than May 21, 2004. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments 8. Telephone Company a. City Engineer (Qwest or United) b. City Attorney c. City Park Director 9. Electric Company d. Fire Marshal (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator 10. Medicom g. Forester 11. U. S. Fish and Wildlife 2. Watershed District Engineer 12. Carver County 3. Soil Conservation Service a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 4. MN Dept. of Transportation 13. Camp Tanadoona 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 14. U of M Landscape Arboretum 6. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 7. MN Dept. of Natural Resources Date: May 3, 2004 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Robert Generous, Senior Planner Subject: Request for Site Plan Approval to expand the parking lot (143 spaces), and a Wetland Alteration Permit to alter and fill wetlands on site on property zoned Office and Institutional District, OI, located at 3121 Westwood Drive (west of TH 41 at Tanadoona Drive), Westwood Community Church. Planning Case: 04-20 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on April 30, 2004. The 60day review period ends June 29, 2004. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on June 1, 2004 at 7:00 p.m in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than May 21, 2004. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments 8. Telephone Company a. City Engineer (Qwest or United) b. City Attorney c. City Park Director 9. Electric Company d. Fire Marshal (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator 10. Medicom g. Forester 11. U. S. Fish and Wildlife 2. Watershed District Engineer 12. Carver County 3. Soil Conservation Service a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 4. MN Dept. of Transportation 13. Camp Tanadoona 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 14. U of M Landscape Arboretum 6. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 7. MN Dept. of Natural Resources MPLS COUNCIL OF CAMPFIRE GIRLS 2610 UNIVERSITY AVE W MINNEAPOLIS MN 55114-2007 Mr. Peter Moe MN Landscape Arboretum 3675 Arboretum Blvd. Chaska MN 55318-9613 MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner FROM: Steven Torell, Building Official DATE: May 11, 2004 SUBJ: Site Plan review for Westwood Community Church parking lot expansion, 3301 Tanadoona Drive Planning Case: 04-20 I have reviewed the plans for the above project dated April 30, 2004. Following are my comments, which should be included as conditions of approval. 1. Three accessible parking spaces must be added to the existing accessible parking area G/safety/stlmemostp lan/ W estwoodCo=ChwchParkingexpansion CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH Date: 05/04/2004 Time: 9:41am Receipt Number: DW / 5021 Clerk: DANIELLE #04-20 WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH ITEM REFERENCE AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- DEVAP #04-20 WESTWOOD COMM CHURCH USE & VARIANCE 500.00 PLAT RECORDING 100.00 SIGN ESCROW 100.00 WETLAND 275.00 SIGN PERMIT 75.00 Total: --------------- 1,050.00 Check 22406 1,050.00 Change: --------------- 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! PIONEER ENGINEERING, P.A. PLEASE RESPOND TO: ® 2422 ENTERPRISE DRIVE ❑ 625 HIGHWAY ]0 NE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN RLAINE, MN 55434 55120 PHONE: (763) 783-1880 PHONE: (651) 6814914 FAX: (763) 783-1883 FAX: (651) 681-9488 TO: Chanhassen, City of 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 CORRESPONDENCE SENT VIA: ❑ MAIL ❑ FAX L E TITER OTV R�AINNMII0111 DATE: April 30, 2004 JOB NO. 104049 ATTENTION: Bob Generous RE: Westwood Community Church 26 14I PAGES INCLUDING TRANSMITTAL ® OTHER 199%'Memnger COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 26 site plan 1 11 X17 & 8 1/2 X11 1 Application & Check 7 Wetland Alteration Reports THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW ❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ FORYOURUSE REMARKS ® AS REQUESTED ❑ FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT Bob Give me a call if you need any additional information CITY OF CHANHASSEN COPY TO: Dan Russ APR 30 SIGNED: Doul; Stahl IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE PIONEER ENGINEERING, P.A. PLEASE RESPOND TO: ® 2422 ENTERPRISE DRIVE ❑ 625 HIGHWAY 10 NE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN BLAINE, MN 55434 55120 PHONE: (763) 783-1880 PHONE: (651) 681-1914 FAX: (763) 783-1883 FAX: (651) 681-9488 TO: Chanhassen, City of 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 CORRESPONDENCE SENT VIA: ❑ MALL ❑ FAX LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 14, 2004 JOB NO. 104049 ATTENTION: Bob Generous RE: Westwood Community Church 26 PAGES INCLUDING TRANSMITTAL ® OTHER 1 Hour messenger COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 26 revised siteplan/ cover sheet , Grading , Utility, Landscape & Survey I storm calcs for matt 1 11X17 &8 1/2X11 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW ❑ FORAPPROVAL ❑ FORYOURUSE MITI.\;I;i.`I COPY TO: CITY OF RECEIVED ," MAY 14 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT ® AS REQUESTED ❑ FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT SIGNED: Doug Stahl IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE Location Map Westwood Community Church 3121 Westwood Drive City of Chanhassen Planning Case No. 04-20 Lake Minnewashta Subject Property State Hwy 5 n s Me, B. w 1/2'-Plmt YhM BlWmnouv Mew Cunae Taw Cant 5 235 335]7 1$' -Plant YIavC BiNmMwv Bae Courn Tpe pIBBBSgI%IgT 12'MNDO 5 Aggregate Bose 1LCS GuaNee 1r YNooT3,e9.2e.Meet LLL, Grdww 5 Al (Se Note ]) 8' Gaa 5 Aggregate Baee Souldy toox cm.n.e TEMPORARY DRIVEWAY SECTION GAL DESCRIPTION a� :5. w+ IffPm. Prr.r a~ ....`.r�..�._..a �...., .. ._ �- , r s tlme Rsr.rA � en'mernr .�e+rr.rsr. rrr.rrr u. ry 17»w� w.�iY�_riwP ya ar..w aM r°.4+mow r- we. v.r.ra 'r PARKING • NEW SPACES F/i RO.G.A. REYAMNL MALL' / ' nrwulxr eAvr 9WA,MBIf 5 . kLr (g iarN Slw 5N30 to 11aOo) �• rMwa Game m d 1/2" nCme Else ar WttV ,1--, 1.5 : 1 4' TwwA. Sal 1 1/2' -Root Me" Bitumnaa MewM9 Game t MUIN w Bob Tpe MIMEASW55r 8818 LLLTwk Cwt - 2357 Can Vete WN Y -Plant Mieve BltumMwz Bme Louree T1ae p1BBB.B y 12' -Gan 5 A11n1.te Bae., IDBS GueAee 24* MNOOT 3149.2B SNect Qw Nr BMrm (Se Note T) W 78TH STREET N W" IAAlO CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Ne m F---ilk—� 0 cBAP1Bc scAtc IN rear 1w04P-PRELIM-SITEDW 1 E CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED per` bE i APR 3 0 2004 J // IO,OtF m m611MIC!lM Qf _ 1 MBR, W" IAAlO CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Ne m F---ilk—� 0 cBAP1Bc scAtc IN rear 1w04P-PRELIM-SITEDW 1 x**x *,F -Min—ring *x** 8612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PARKING LOT PAVEMENT SECTION 1.5' BIT.WEAR COURSE 1.5' BIT. BASE COURSE 12' AGGREGATE BASE 12' SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL B612 CURB ! GUTTER 90.00 = OBNOTS TDP Di WR6 pEVATW = D ON RP W" WT 0 IS aU a4 c1uaBNc scare w eeeT mmu9 T.NI fl!1 6 lN0110COURT S O16.4141 TmR w WAORAM HRH0VQ+ ORVE ! 1RA6 E - = 1064.11 tOCD4o_333.Dw6 Reytn.Wu in -F uW W /ry'gY v�S{�n fy ON r0's T. dD W. Fait dBaum EROMM M130I. FFNK - TYPE 1 LIM1U Psb EDSTNG MNRO613, ❑ p6CRpRON G.TCN BASIN 0 • MAIeDL p ► FLMED END „.�4 BECKIW — - - <<- -- EXISTING STORK 4WEP 4 PxaPOFn SroRM s , (NM fM Wer_. Fl. FM9 sv Re °✓� _____-_____ EASFNFNT UNE 6 YNIIIY LEAN/ p �fwn -- -- ENSDNG TO CONTWR UNE N PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR UNE I•"'•4 POND WRET UNE ----r--E1---- POND MGH WATEF UNE 1 - ] w 9(➢ PObIJ u rplp _ EMERGENCY OWRR-OW ® 11L ��✓'� 18'HNYW MO FR09^N lsFFmrL FF'N2 _ FH£ i �yr�u TO IYtlO3E RUH6F o n Bo lm cBeemc�Fa BEN@lI6MS6 ND END OF HWO`hR COURT s F1EV. = 1079.41 LUL HE QUADRANT KK Wt mW B TRAA n ... 1064,11 UNDERG "D UTIUTES UNDERGROUND UT� SHOMN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, PRIOR TO ANT CONSTRUCT . CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL AT 612-4,64-0002. TME UNE ALL EROSION CONTROL FENCE TO SE INSTA MCR TO ANY GRADING OM.RATONS SEED AND WLON SHALL BE ARPUSD TO EXPOSED AREAS AS iO OY S - SRTHAN J:1 . DAYS -101l TO TO1 X1 1 4 DAYS - PUTTER THAN 101.21 DAYS SAT FENCE TO BE NSTALL AR"D PON! AFTER PDF® GRAWNG IS COIPIFTEB. $T FENCE Am OTHER TEYAORARY EROSION CONTROL 1SAF1RE5 SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL THE FTE HAS WpERGONE FINAL STABUZATION. SAT FENCE FLT FENCE MUST BE REPANED ON REPLACED WHEN NIX NCTIWAl OR SEDIMENT REAL 1/3 OF THE FENQ HEIGHT. TOPSOIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL HAVE A WNIMUM OF SX (6) INCHES OF TOPSOIL PLACED. SEEDING S® UM FMTL BE MHDOT NU SOB. APPLY AT 75 Pq DS PER ACRE DOMAANT SEEDING AFTER NOYEMBFR 1. MULURBG MULCH SHALL SE MNDOT TYPE -1. SItXw SIHOLRD BE SWd+ID UNIFORMLY AT A RATE OF TWO (2) TONS PER ACLS t ANCHG MTH EITHER NETTING OR A STRAIGHT DISC ALL SEMING ANO MULCMNa SNAIL TARE P 'MTHIN TMV (2) wE S OF THE CONPLIED GRADING C ATON. INSPECTIONS EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE NSPEGIFD ONCE EVERY SEW" DAYS AND MTHIN 24 HOURS OF O.S OR LARGER RAINFALL EVENT. STREET SWEEPING STREET SWEEPING AS REOUIRSO BY WHICLE TRACKING OF SEOIMENT SHALL BE PERFORMED AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE DEWATERING ALL WATER TO BE DISCHARGED INTO A TEMPORARY SEDNENTAIION BASH WRH EROSION PROTECTION iFRl1I1 APPLY 4,QU POUNDS PER ACRE OF 20-O I` OR EW) OF FT (4) MI2 S INLURPOIUTE IT INTO THE TOP THREE (6) HE FG1R (4) INCHES Di SFFACE SGL BY gSKNG OR SONE OWER SUTABfE IEAFIS CATCH BASINS SILT FENCE AROUND AU OFF STREET CATCH BASINS PER CffY DISTAL GRADING LEGEND EDSTNG MNRO613, ❑ p6CRpRON G.TCN BASIN 0 • MAIeDL p ► FLMED END • • BECKIW — - - <<- -- EXISTING STORK 4WEP 4 PxaPOFn SroRM s , — - - << -- FUTURE STORY SEWER PERFORATED GUN TLE _____-_____ EASFNFNT UNE -- -- "STING T CONTOUR UNE -- -- ENSDNG TO CONTWR UNE PROPOFD 2' CONTOUR UNE PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR UNE I•"'•4 POND WRET UNE ----r--E1---- POND MGH WATEF UNE 84EJ PROPOSED SPOT O-EVA70N y ♦ ♦ EMERGENCY OWRR-OW ® 11L PROPOSED RETAKING WALL LAYO'J 101069-FlNAL-GR.DK a a NW GRAP®C SC11e IN f'BFT B T.N.H. ENO OF HGHOVER COURT S 6 . = 1079.41 T.N.H NE WARRANT HIGHOY Mn & TRA9. F . = 1064.11 Frx w PIONEER engineering i w� MXR FA&SC $- HIWMUM Dmn1 1-V wL Nr ulxMw WT Drs KRM J wwwy' TO IYIYIII RLWfFF r SIE IOM RIfA -; SX.VL fiE RA�i DxDEA RW(. m sr I Mw Mxa+.nax P1RaxN aocN OM sDW ®w•r.e,kxew�� moaoN mNmn w � rvr HZ FRDSM [ON, sYy+•��+. GRADING LEGEND msrnc PAaPosm ❑ ® oEscraFrow CARR B N O • MANHIX£ p ► FLMED END • O BEEHIVE — - - « - -- SMSPNG STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWEP — - - << - -- NTURE STORM SEWER PERFORATED DRNN TLE ____--_____ EASEMENT UNE -- -- E SRNG 2CONTOUR UNE -- -- ETDSRNG 10' CWTOA UNE PROPOS➢ 2' CONTOUR UNE PROPOSED 10' CONTOUR UNE POND WRET J E --- --- POND Xl6 WATER ONE PROPOSED SPOT F_EVARW yyy EMERGENCY OWRROw ........... • ER09CN CONTROL FENCE ® � PROPOSED R MNWG WAL "r T. 1D4019 M&-M.DW lir / V Q NMI SIU PLANT LIST GR C S= DI P LANDSCAPE NOTES •` ro„�� .bnw i.r r• •Y �_V sY W ysiq b b praeM b/ a1Mf •1b MV bbl b! Y i,tlYtl nN V�V W •M rrl Y.Y Y r w Ybb btl b bb•.w+Y'ti �sYYr rY.rrw~r.a •YVY� bM7�Ybm,IN yyW�yI�� r ._yP�) Y. rb b Vb9 upryW •b.lYa Wim1Y—ill Wer �l rr wr r o+rx .w. u+w• ar.a. rY rew ._ Y_ wr.rbMwry W�Pb_tiY_ "_>000,_j _CONTROL POINT N( SET PK NAIL J LEV. = 984.81 121 DONALD WYMAN CRABAPPLE 1-1/2 CAL, B&B 24 SNOWBIRD THORNLESS HOWTHORN CAL, B&B 24 S CRABAPPLE ADAMS 1 _ -99C 1-1/2 CAL.. B&B 0 994— DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL / I394— . .� 31 `• AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE zl l �� rt 1-1/2 CAL. B&B II 3 RIVER BIRCH 6 HT. B&B (multi—stem) e � 2 SWAMP WHITE OAKT" �a 1-1/2 CAL, B&B'aryr" 1 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE cm— 3 SWAMP WHITE OAK 1) ' 0 I 1 1-1/2 CAL. B&B O 0 1 r— 96. V Q NMI SIU PLANT LIST GR C S= DI P LANDSCAPE NOTES •` ro„�� .bnw i.r r• •Y �_V sY W ysiq b b praeM b/ a1Mf •1b MV bbl b! Y i,tlYtl nN V�V W •M rrl Y.Y Y r w Ybb btl b bb•.w+Y'ti �sYYr rY.rrw~r.a •YVY� bM7�Ybm,IN yyW�yI�� r ._yP�) Y. rb b Vb9 upryW •b.lYa Wim1Y—ill Wer �l rr wr r o+rx .w. u+w• ar.a. rY rew ._ Y_ wr.rbMwry W�Pb_tiY_ a mom:; .cv.J >r uN m°engnam.. u, ew o na nbnwum mY N4e) e,, vee p�tl,.mm SO1,q b IXy sq a nw�miwt q}wtla LOCATION MAP: iWMB- ,Dw. WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH emis nv® _ ow -1x- GRADING, UTILITY & STREET CONSTRUCTION PLANS -° '-- CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX g � �� --«---sem 1. COVER SHEET SITE PLAN —_--_<—_--s�� - 2. STORM SEWER NEW PARKING, PARKING DRIVE, & W. 78TH ST. _ 3. STORM SEWER su.cuc vri¢WEST 4. STR7EETSCONSTRUCT10N WEST 78TH S ® CONSTRUCTION 5. STREET CONSTRUCTION O WEST 78TH STREET ONSPARKINTRUCTION 6. SEG r ��� DRIVE S �m su uxw>m ua, vsuv vkxc G e r 7. PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION Y rm )Haan vyex wu ° NEW PARKING 8. TURN LANE CONSTRUCTION L ♦ mn Jnr .ao ruien ryo gnia NEW PARKING • X 781H STREET k ST. HIGHWAY N0. 41 166 NEW SPACES 9. TURN LANE STRIPING —a—a— mn �xAim o�rmr�+nnr airs •�-� --__—_— ,K W. 78TH STREET & ST. HIGHWAY N0. 41 —b—b— —u—a— ymn �wwan bmmaaro au�ex va rew i.or �rwar ux � 10. DETAILS m nmmr nc incArzn nem aPnn ux D m� uff G-1 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL G-2 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL i i r n ouw av�o a eo G-3 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL LS -1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 an.-oe PAw �eyrs aaei uc 6 2 a mom:; .cv.J >r uN m°engnam.. u, ew o na nbnwum mY N4e) e,, vee p�tl,.mm SO1,q b IXy sq a nw�miwt q}wtla LOCATION MAP: iWMB- ,Dw. ❑ a uT BA N O •UA %E D 0. M m END ® 0 BEE)IRF_ R-4342 << - __ E%ISRNG ST SEViER R -3290-L CBMH-119 Kn MED 6TORH EEwER R -3290-L CB -118 mwRE S wm OEWER co -� REED LOCATED CULVERT R -3290-L ® ROZ LOCATED CATCH 6AEIN R -3290-L ® HELD LOCATED M ED ENO SECTON unoDwRaxw vnnFs cAu M xauPS BESOE olAalc QPIYN SfAIE df CNL lYH L71i5 /AF/e (851) w. rau ERIF� �-Eoo-ss:-11ss GR4REGC WALE w If1T 02KaI6m TAX END OF HIGOIPR Cd NR& E . - 1078.41 TNH WE WADRU HMJIOVER DRIVE 6 TRAI DEV. = 106E11 STORM SEWER SCHEDULE MH a CB NUMBER STRUCT. SIZE NEEHAH CASRNG a EQUAL CB -115 1 27' DIA R-4342 MM -114 4B' MX R-4342 013MH-113 48' DIA. R-4342 CB -120 24'X36' R -3290-L CBMH-119 48' DIA. R -3290-L CB -118 24'X36' R -3290-L CBMH-117 48' DIA R -3290-L CBMH-116 48' DIA R -3290-L MH -121 48' DIA R-1642 ...... ...... .. .................... .................. 102s.::::...... :...:.....:....::::::::::::.::::::......:::..::::::::......::....::::.:.::::.... '.::.. 4025 `...::::.:...:.....?QAo 4.. Sm 1 DD 0.. zm :' :. ... DEQ 99b' 995 `s - .....::: ..:: 1415 a am°� .. g 41 1415 9913 �::.i ... .. mem .. �6 �l .. .. :. .. ... m i .�G .. :..: .. 1DOS.i.:: ... : ..I: -:. ..::.........: :: ARp'D� GRADE \\ 05 980 . 45..2 .... - -- ........ ..� .....::rsss '- '11 z T ^ us s 7 Dn4 975 '; 9 .: 75 -. ..:: ,�"AD .. ::: zs• pM... l2• RLP. a.: 5::1r. R4P tl 3: ::::: .: EIRASH .. _ - ..•..L-� : .:::::: �V tl WARD ' goS 995 97Dww aw` a` v w"fro IX 2120 0092 .. - Ts R�100A, LSSI 3 JORiTO 990.....1 ......_ .... „(� 990 965 __.._ _....._ .DE PIGNEH=-R A. 1O 49-320ANC W�A R2N I 917GI MH BI- NUMBER CB NU m NGVMM.IIF 0 0 NG ► G�u TM AIE.A CB -Hoz 27' DIA << - CBMH-103 1< R-1290-1 CBMH-104 48" DIA. R -3290-L A -A OD, r OFT:� 'X!- MT -A, POND OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE N.Ts CATCH BASIN MANNOLE H M END BEEHIVE EMS'BNG STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER MIRE STORM SEER 'IM LOCATED CULVERT nELD LOCATED CATCR BASIN {HELD LOCATED FLARED END SECTIM STORM SE VER CONSTRUCTION NOTES-. 1. MMDE NEENAH CASTING M APPROVID EWON ALL CATCH BASINS AS NOTED. S,AB WE1eNG ETR R -S290 -L NEENAN CASINGS W ALL CATCH BASIN MAINOIES UNLESS OTHERMSE NOM. S. A, MEN(ll BACRFAL MATIVIM SHALL BE PLACED AND COMPACTED IN (JNIFORM LACERS USING WAIITY CWPACTM VETHMS 4. MAL S1RUMRE CIT -SET TO BE WRM BY ( TRAC AND INSECTOR BASE) ON MATERIAL SDPPIED TO PRPECT. MM STAMG SIALL BE SET ACCORDING 70 BACK -OF -CURB. SEE SHEET 2 WEST 78TH STREET ILI Iti NTA, A -A STA, STA STORM SEWER SCHEDULE MH BI- NUMBER CB NU STRUCT. I SI M I NEEHAH CASTING w EQUAL MMM -M 60" DIA. R -3290-L CB -Hoz 27' DIA R-4342 CBMH-103 48' DIA R-1290-1 CBMH-104 48" DIA. R -3290-L CBMH-105 48' DIA R -3290:!- C8-106 27' DIX R-4342 CUMH-107 1290-L -108 27- DI& R-43*2 —CS -IDD 48" DIA. SPECIAL cqMPBIC 5'418 IN PSS ENJ ND OF NIGN(I �T S- 1079.41 T.N-H. ME WARRANT lmoVFR MVE & MAIL ELEV.. 1064.11 104049-321 D.G .......... ........... ........... . . . . . . . . . . .............................................. ........... .. ...................... - ................ .. . . ....... ........... .. .............. ........ .... ............ I ..... .. ......... �OPOSED:IRRVE ... ...... .. ................. ...... . ........ ...w ............ .. . ................ ................................................ ... . 2rFS. ............... ... ..... .. .................... ........ ................. .......... . ... ..... ...... ......... ......................... .... .. .. L M ..... - &7QY,C W/:TRAS:GA:::.... AS & ................. .................... ..... .... .................. ............................. ..... . LASr3 : :::W/WOMV TM:::::: .......................... 00 amd ..................... .............. . .. . .FP.:RP a ... ... ............... .... q... ...... ...... ... ..... ...... ......... a ..... . .... ......... ...... ......... .... ........ ......... ........... .................................. .......... 100 ::: I ........................... ......... ..... RM c ....................... ...... :: ............... ............... ................. .... .. ........... .............. .................. ........ ........... :: . ... ....... ............... ...... ......... ............................... .................... ... ............ .................... .............. ........ : . .. .. . .... ......... ... . ... .. :::::::: ........... ... ............................. ..................... . ......... ...................... ........ ................... .................. ........... ......... :::: ....... ................. ................................ .............. 111 :,:: ...... ...... A ................ ........ aa 995 ................ ........... . .. ................ or: .. ... . ... ..... I ........... . ................. ..................................... ......... ...... .............................. ....................... . mm z .... . . ............ ... kg .................................................................. mm.»>:::::::::::::::::::::::......�g::5 �11 ......... gg js� -- . ..... ...... ....... ................... ......... ...... ........ ....... ... ...... . .............. .... ..... .... ................... ............ �990 :::::: 'd ........ .................... - ............................. . ....... ... .......... :: * ......... ...... ........ ....... ... * .............. ............... ................ . ...... ....... ........ .............. L:w ....... ........... ................. . ...... ............ ... ... ......... ...... ............. ........ ........................... ...... .. ............. ..... . ............. ......... ............... a w :;:: - w: ....... ...... ............. ...................... . ..... Fzs:, 985 ::7::::::::: ............ .... ......... . ........ n7. ..... ........... . ..... ................ ............. .......... . . .... .... ............... ....................... ...... .... as .. ................. .......... .... . ........... ............ -W/G.E0TDME 95.Q. ................. gfe()e:D ...... .71E 1AST:M UC%tTS . . . ........ .............. ...... .... ........ ........ .......................... ...............................5. ......... ...... ............ ..................... . ................. ... . .............................. 975 ... o.om: ....... ...... 104049-321 D.G a (Bhw St. 5+50 to 11+00) 15.5 l0 9eM 15.5' t° Bab wear Coupe t° ee 1/2" 04`W' s8 C 1/>•'8 Alww Etl9° ° Gutter 11' 2. 1 JOSSEED 10 4�a L5: 1 <' Topaoi, 5aJ 1 1/2" -Hart mi.. BlO . w dg tf C 10' 811Gi9N0.t5 PATI k Mid. de Sod. i T 2358 LVM£3593fB f11Ack SFLTIM w8618 Rf AMLI TM Codd - u57 Bate dlf® Conn . C°N 2.-Hmt Mored Bito nous Bou Caurm a tLTIFR b T 2150 L`MW35030B T aTAM6 EVe fCiLY (~T 11v 12"-Oau 5 A99 dte B m 1005 Cm Med Kk9 OMIGf j W B KEY 24" MNOOT 3149.28 S®j a TO.C. E AM 4 E MB GrmWar Boroe (Sw K Not. te )) --8619 WRB a Wpm o�ao GRAPHIC SCALE B1 PE6T BEDS TN 081 OF XION0 CWRT S FIEV. ID29.41 T.N.X. NE WAORAM HIPIOMFR CPo�E B lItA4 QEV. � 1064.11 W 78M SMEU WEST 78TH STREET .............. =:� `^ »: . '"�. a :�. - _.» 4...Y : :.+..:..... ..e_.. ...�:.. _ o : . ...... .. '2 eo' o ^o : :.�:-�gg - _: o '. ... 1;030'_. a 3. o '::: .:.:...:,F:�.— '.. : o H ':.... oo.. .... \. g . .......: ..7.00.: . ...... ..... .- ......... ........ ....... ....... .......:..:..:.. .. � .: r a - .... ... . 1020 J . ... ........ .. `.... '.'::: ............ ... ......... :. ..... .... . ...... .. .. .. ...... .. .. . .. ; 015 1... ... .... . _.. ... .. .� s ... .. .. ... S ___.. ................ d - :.. - :.,Msx��.,i.uu. auWaaa6try ......::.::.: ................ �\' .: .: .aM k6dlT 4td 3:M ..... ._ ... ... pUo.W K•'.. .... _ .... ...... :. . . . .. ...... .. .. ... .. ... .... ... ': . HS EIfS' 06113 ..... . PUpl:flEV 109883 iOxf .:.: k�'�': AA 4 bB .' .. STA r9ta3 :.......................: -:... QQ ' .:.........:........:: ................................... ' AI•EIN � ��I.BS . ........... .. . ..: :750. ...-. :. :_.. �i..:. 1009.:::.. :.... : ........ ::':'::.........: ::... ....::.... ... _ .. .. ;: ............ ............. ......... . 99 ........... .. ........ .._ ..... .: ... .... .. ... _.... ........_ .:: -a w \ ... ......... .................................... :.... .. - ... ` ... 9$5 i... _.. _..: ................................................ ...i ... ..:.: 98C i.g -. ` - - .._. �.. 980. - _. .... .............. 975 .::: ce`t �I ':L _. ::� d i _.. _ .. .... 975..: �2M50 20+00 19+50� 19+00 1645D 194W 1)+50 1T+00 18+50 16+W 15+50 154W 14+50��14+00 13+50 13+00 12+50 12+00 t1++C 11 -CC 10+50 10400 9+50 s+OJ 550 0+00 7+70 7+00 6NU UYCUT ^ *ty f a 6' � 3' 12' 12 3' 1' Yln. n ¢ 3.0R 3�19oCe + 1 Sea 115 yoa. m Yoa� 6' Dittll tl Burg Mixed Bituminw¢ W¢ar Course SOOT Lmt NDOT LVWE35057 712" ack Peal — 235] 03 3.5'—PM Yke6 BI}YmTWB Baas Louse LVN5 8 "��_ o.-PMPIDOT ,rex, 5149M le Be... 1005 WYItl TEMPORARY PARKING DRIVE YNDDT n69.2B MOO I a , N t. (See Nota ]) 6* 0 5 Ag Clew 5 AggaJale Bau 9w.110v. 1 1 1005 CruM6tl m CL CARVE DATA m ~ I L-196.]0 TEMPORARY DRIVEWAY SEC710N I. i$ �z.,'ris Tan-98.6{ e 2. a ¢� GRAPt6C SCALE w �ARKS T.N.k END OF HIGHOVER COURT S. E . - 1079.+1 T.N.H. NE QUADRANT 14 H0 R DMW & TRNL E1FV. - 1066.11 TEMPORARY PARKING DRIVE ... .. .. :::' .. ..... -0b .... 1DOar w:' 0 03. :..10.30.:.... ..... ... .......... .. ...... ....... .. ... ...._. ::::..'... ..: ....::-. .:.i :.::.:: '.... ..... :o 1025..... ::....... —", 02- ..1020.'.........:..:......::: .. ... .. .. ..... _ ................. 1015.:.. :...:...... ............ ':. .... .... .:.... -.. ...... .... .... ... ....... .. ......... . .. .. ....... .... --:.. 1010 .:.........:.....:::::::.::...:::........:....::::::::.::....:..._:..:::.:::::. .. ......... ':......:..::.....:.........:....:.. _ ..... " :' .. .... .......... .... . 1005.........................................................................................�C :.......... ... .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. ... :":.'..:: ' 100!` ... . .... s .. . .............. .. : . ......... ....... -. ......... oaaD .. o.50......taao 1+iu"""z+ou""'riw ... - .......3'. - . ... 3+DD Yiiu .:.. i6od" 450 Sa00 b+bD b+aD 'G:sD ]+oD ]+ili ......... 9iU0 ....................... ..... ........ ... ................. .. *#1H* 101069-5320N'G ° STREET CONSTRUCTION GwESTw00D COMMUNICHURCH WESTWOOD COMMU NITY CHURCH � 6 1 10 s¢rs . �e'iii CMe uNv able el NN�uMe SWw Wei Os. MILL 1 1/2' SANCUT DEPTH V 4 NEARING COURSE MIXTURE (MVNE450358) V 3 NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTUREMVNW350358) V 3 NON -NEARING COURSE MIXTURE LVNW350308) BASE. CLASS 5 (SPEC. 2211) PAVEMENT PATCH SECTION FOR WEST 781H STREET GRAPHIC SCALE W FBtT 9MCHMAWS T.N H. END OF HIGHO`hR CpIRT S ELN — 10/9.41 TA.N NE ou DR Hp OWR DRry @ MAL E . = 1064.11 y *>f* x WONE SR englnaeNng *rrW 1O 045-33a.DK 1 I I m 1 1 La 4' DO wr c LME I OW Ir smn uE ,wM owTno r oAscs `——� Enslalc laO minM �� 14' :r i � t 4 a`' -- Ewslrlo / sato uaE rnE `_ 4' SC/O UE Mf1E STATE HIGHWAY N0. 41 EXSINC IELODti EpSf. 5I1WND ry 5QD ME THE Y WOE rEl10I DA91 '� 15 UIX EPAOID h MI TIAPOI J 4' SDIID LME YF111W' 155 \ 155 ODSD 6 Iz5 \ uw � TE S WDVE MEE%1M WD E W1n1E {' DOLIBIE t!!E 1EL1A 111E 1810/ \ r EOLD LIE WNIIE Ilium ow. SII R 2' WIDE Y OW DASH 15' WIDE SPACING 6' SOLID UNE 1ELtDW 1u 16.7' ud e EMELE LINE YE11.OW 4' SOLID ME Mr. 1z0' NE E%L1Lti1NG 1 +PI: ^WW LANES AMD n ,w EIGSIDW 2' DASHES r SIILID ME YE11IIW - GDAP}llC SCALE W PEST EnS1MG 2' DA4ES T.N.K END G N610VEN CM*t7 S EM. a 107441 T.N K i NE auANT HWIWVER DRIVE k ll A 11EV. � 1064.11 ** IHx lOWA6-SSS.RNC PIONEER *s glneering I ma. Wa WN Nm ... sw< er w r.+v w N o.ws A. SHEET DnE OWIEW L>rs�cr s[Er 9 5P 10 sH *"M _ .�— ,,, K TURN LANE STRIPING WES'fW00D COMMUNITY CHURCH WEST W00D COMMUNITY CHURCH 41:. cam.,,. av a c. z,a. „N....e.. _rW • r •, CRY OF CONCRETE THRUST ` BLOCKING 2-9J 1002 dos l76] � WYMR OK 9uTR OJ .tl�N��i®rJ r.pcum,r. rr ~ A � See Mr r' �rnox a -w Q '� u�m•.r mgrvwq: A RIPRAP Y pZZ�� t 6g _ ISOMETRIC er r • 4�� u�6 w rid 1 I � wb s AND GUTTER r.m... 0,..1 SECTION A -A Tr rea,.�x nm CONSTURUCTION AT CATCH BASIN 2-9] 3106 CITY OF I PEDESTRIAN CBUU1321 CURB RAMP 2-97 " 5215 .Qpu pFE1N0 rtsr �rs 9EMOIID IIE 91.`!LS LLAAI' ELIF➢tt➢E VW6 �1 110 .'LpIQI' IY fAA6.11p1. cry OF A K mmmB EED DETAIL 2-97 1003 0A l76] � WYMR OK 9uTR OJ .tl�N��i®rJ r.pcum,r. rr ~ "'..•�• mO7mf aC.f1 Mr r' �rnox a -w Q �..•....:L , 1w o.om aural srnw a -a ,.mo-. .Is RIPRAP Y pZZ�� DETAIL I �1—i•r tea_ CRY OF SILT 08818= FENCE 2-97 i wrmw ,. ew r nw w,m•r 6WE c r.•r am awm me x�i A �m r 1rum. iY K i i/o• ¢ i CRY OF AR N SECTION AND TRASH CAJARD 2-9J 3108 z, \ C 8r 3�` `_ ¢ rr ~ i� • Mr r' Q qry pF Y CASTING AND Y pZZ�� 6g � er r • 4�� u�6 w R a myb�a rr=-ours 0' Aw fvmm � TYPICAL CURB �[ AND GUTTER Q€ ` 5203 Tr rea,.�x nm CRY OF TYPICAL HYDRANT INSTALLATION ®® 2-97 ` 1004 i wrmw ,. ew r nw w,m•r 6WE c r.•r am awm me x�i A �m r 1rum. iY K i i/o• ¢ i CRY OF AR N SECTION AND TRASH CAJARD 2-9J 3108 u CRY OF GATE VALVE AND BO INSTALLATION ® 2-97 ` 1006 Ym®.b•.r.1 blrr0� iW rumm�.v ..r r w ,u ir1 CRY � trlt,n� w1•�e•ee11� Rc510c'N TIAL YYYYYY�WWYi�Y�� STREET SECTION 2-97 1` 5200 w ROCR ENTRANCE z, \ k[ � I• t�.el,�f� t. •� rr ~ fN mIH Ol,@®1 Mr r' qry pF s06`,ua a'�aaQ CASTING AND vrac aum w: r. m R er r n, � w R a myb�a rr=-ours u CRY OF GATE VALVE AND BO INSTALLATION ® 2-97 ` 1006 Ym®.b•.r.1 blrr0� iW rumm�.v ..r r w ,u ir1 CRY � trlt,n� w1•�e•ee11� Rc510c'N TIAL YYYYYY�WWYi�Y�� STREET SECTION 2-97 1` 5200 w ROCR ENTRANCE z, CRY OF k[ •� rr RCP @DIP fN mIH Ol,@®1 DApM OIrH qry pF s06`,ua a'�aaQ CASTING AND vrac aum w: r. m R er r n, � w R a myb�a rr=-ours 0' Aw fvmm � TYPICAL CURB �[ AND GUTTER 2-97 ` 5203 Tr rea,.�x nm ®® ar • �aw. �e,eeer..e u CRY OF GATE VALVE AND BO INSTALLATION ® 2-97 ` 1006 Ym®.b•.r.1 blrr0� iW rumm�.v ..r r w ,u ir1 CRY � trlt,n� w1•�e•ee11� Rc510c'N TIAL YYYYYY�WWYi�Y�� STREET SECTION 2-97 1` 5200 w ROCR ENTRANCE z, CRY OF k[ •� rr RCP @DIP fN mIH Ol,@®1 DApM OIrH qry pF MANHOLE CASTING AND AO.AISTING DETAIL m R er r n, &Wmmu Cut 0' Aw fvmm CRY OF TYPICAL CURB �[ AND GUTTER 2-97 ` 5203 m &T. Y m CWI✓g AU1 DETII uc�f:.. v,.1�_•q!.T4 _—uui� �va4542 Mv, 2110 Xzrx— crry or PIPE NG m� I P.V.C. &DDIB. S. I 2-97 ` 2203 rrbo.aJ PLAN __ � _ mt•r rwm-•.r'...d � gip.. I,� •b• ayY�, r Vow` — fam"m: mr SECTION ry v �mr�^�.a�f�m a.�.s ae�i,vm•r w •�.wvs CRY OF STORM SEWER munm I CATCH BASIN 2-97 ` 3101 M0@mmw.Qre r m.r.. r a.•rr r r.m w. mwr� CITY a CZAEUMPIPE BEDDING IN POOR SOILS �2_oJ r" 220 C r CRY OF PIPE BEDDING GOOD SOILS MT. &L4 fR BN[ER CWRF IAt CETnL RCP @DIP fN mIH Ol,@®1 DApM OIrH qry pF MANHOLE CASTING AND AO.AISTING DETAIL 2110 Xzrx— crry or PIPE NG m� I P.V.C. &DDIB. S. I 2-97 ` 2203 rrbo.aJ PLAN __ � _ mt•r rwm-•.r'...d � gip.. I,� •b• ayY�, r Vow` — fam"m: mr SECTION ry v �mr�^�.a�f�m a.�.s ae�i,vm•r w •�.wvs CRY OF STORM SEWER munm I CATCH BASIN 2-97 ` 3101 M0@mmw.Qre r m.r.. r a.•rr r r.m w. mwr� CITY a CZAEUMPIPE BEDDING IN POOR SOILS �2_oJ r" 220 C r CRY OF PIPE BEDDING GOOD SOILS RCP @DIP 2-97 ` 2202 10.0.9-DETNLS-TDWG 1 ;01 L 54 RM�WARXS T.NH FND C HlGHVOER CWRT ELEV. = 109,41 T.N.H. NE QUADRANT H6 OVER G . & TRAJL OLEV. - 108{.I1 GRADING LEGEND Not MIER FAMC AU- w HCl EXMIN3 PROPOSEDwm AWA7N R=, CATCH BASN mmH(XE BEEHIVE AP << - E%1511NG STQtM SEINER << FUIURE STORM \\ PERFORA� AN UK MFRK 2' CMMUR ME MSM1G 10 CMTWR ME RRM� IT �MUR ME % PoNt WTIET ME m PI,K HIGR WATER ME PR()PO� �T EUEVAIIW EMERGENCY 0VERF� EPOqOR CQR7Ra n PRI)Pc- Kt.AIWING W.ul LnYOUT 7 I01049-nNAL-GR.DNG PIC ang If. GNB W F� ;01 L 54 RM�WARXS T.NH FND C HlGHVOER CWRT ELEV. = 109,41 T.N.H. NE QUADRANT H6 OVER G . & TRAJL OLEV. - 108{.I1 GRADING LEGEND Not MIER FAMC AU- w HCl EXMIN3 PROPOSEDwm AWA7N R=, CATCH BASN mmH(XE BEEHIVE AP << - E%1511NG STQtM SEINER << FUIURE STORM \\ PERFORA� AN UK MFRK 2' CMMUR ME MSM1G 10 CMTWR ME RRM� IT �MUR ME % PoNt WTIET ME m PI,K HIGR WATER ME PR()PO� �T EUEVAIIW EMERGENCY 0VERF� EPOqOR CQR7Ra n PRI)Pc- Kt.AIWING W.ul LnYOUT 7 I01049-nNAL-GR.DNG PIC ang If. GNB ;01 L 54 RM�WARXS T.NH FND C HlGHVOER CWRT ELEV. = 109,41 T.N.H. NE QUADRANT H6 OVER G . & TRAJL OLEV. - 108{.I1 GRADING LEGEND Not MIER FAMC AU- w HCl EXMIN3 PROPOSEDwm AWA7N R=, CATCH BASN mmH(XE BEEHIVE AP << - E%1511NG STQtM SEINER << FUIURE STORM \\ PERFORA� AN UK MFRK 2' CMMUR ME MSM1G 10 CMTWR ME RRM� IT �MUR ME % PoNt WTIET ME m PI,K HIGR WATER ME PR()PO� �T EUEVAIIW EMERGENCY 0VERF� EPOqOR CQR7Ra n PRI)Pc- Kt.AIWING W.ul LnYOUT 7 I01049-nNAL-GR.DNG PIC ang Survey for: WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH 1, Jv I ---------------------------------------------- E X II J ` J ---------- ---art- ----�- ,—ri:— J I R I �.✓, �- t`f i 11111;;/ % _„` -- IF!fflpilll!I� �= ra t li l l III! ;! ff fff xae�s's�z'w ui�ws. Yb I << i_.u. �•�_s_.r n _s r+r�_rrn�w �yl L L'\ 9mAv c rt M n� utm�n w®16 Vx wv R iuv. Eo. cz <C N ' LEGEND r------r------T------T-------, f ri CITY OF RECHANHASSEN J rJa e MAY 14 2004 r :: � '� "` »� s �, ;� ` J ---------- ---art- ----�- ,—ri:— J I R I �.✓, �- t`f i 11111;;/ % _„` -- IF!fflpilll!I� �= ra t li l l III! ;! ff fff xae�s's�z'w ui�ws. Yb I << i_.u. �•�_s_.r n _s r+r�_rrn�w �yl L L'\ 9mAv c rt M n� utm�n w®16 Vx wv R iuv. Eo. cz <C LEGEND r------r------T------T-------, f ri CITY OF RECHANHASSEN MAY 14 2004 :: � '� "` »� j I y' T— 5 •AGI �, ;� ��,—_..,aae CHANHASSEN P LANNINGDEPT PIONE6I e . g w a ,w- n4 x¢ss mrn S. nT nq pg.v LOGs.[V'w LOG GYM CBIR sYe a /� DEVELOPM_ A WELSH COMPANY Dan Russ Executive Vice President 7807 Cwk dge Cit k Minneapolis, MN 55439-2609 TEL 952.897.7745 CEL 612.599,2105 FAX 952.842.7745 E-MAIL d*uss@wwelshro.com * * Ofr" (651) 681-1914 Ext. 638 * 4( fax (651) 681-9488 41, PIONEER engineering.. * T * LAN SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE AENGINEERS S I CIVIL 4LS RCH TECTS DOUG STAHL, P.E. CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSED MINNESOTA E-MAIL ftt.MOpio,w,ng.t 2422 Enterprise Drive • Mendota Heights, MN 55120 625 Hwy. 10 N.E. • Blaine, MN 55434