The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-26_HARVIEUX ADDITIONLI • The contents of this file have been scanned. Do not add anything to it unless it has been scanned. 0 0 Approval Documents IIC�ITTY�O�Fp CI�ANIIASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.2271190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us fo 10 November 20, 2012 Kay Lemke Land Records Clerk Carver County 600 East 4ei Street Chaska, MN 55318 Re: ZONING LOT DESIGNATION Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Harvieux Addition PID 253090010 and 253090020 Dear Ms. Lemke: At the owner's request, this letter is to request that these two parcels be placed under a single Parcel Identification Number. Enclosed is an application to combine real estate parcels. The City -of Chanhassen has no objection, pursuant to Chanhassen City Code Section 20-903, to combining Lot 1, Block 1, Harvieux Addition with Lot 2, Block 1, Harvieux Addition, PIN 25-3090010 and 25-3090020, respectively, into a single zoning lot. These two lots are under single ownership (it is my understanding that the property owners have recently recorded a quit claim deed to this affect). Please revise the legal description for the property to include both parcels' legal descriptions and combine under a single parcel identification number. Hereafter, interior lot lines within the zoning lot shall be disregarded in applying setbacks and other zoning ordinance standards. Additionally, the lot may not be subdivided without complying with the city's subdivision ordinance. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 227-1131 or by email at lbgenerous&i.chanhassen.mn.us. Please send verification with the new PIN to me once the property has been combined. Sincere Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner c: Leanne & Ron Harvieux ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Building Files for 6601 and 6603 Horseshoe Curve Planning Case File #05-26 Enclosures g:\plan\2005 planning cases\05-26 harvieux subdivision\wning Ir letter.doc Chanhassen is a Community for Lite - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED Deceived CARVER COUNTY Taxpayer Services Department Government Center - Administration Building 600 East 4th Street Chaska, MN 55318-2102 Phone (952) 361-1910 Fax(952)361-1919 Application to Combine Real Estate Parcels Per MN Statute 272.46 the county auditor, upon written application of any person, shall for property tax purposes only, combine legal descriptions of contiguous parcels to which the applicant(s) hold title. In order to be combined, the following requirements must be met: • Receipt of completed form by owner or designated representative • Based upon deeds of record, parcels must be of the same (identical) ownership • Parcels must be contiguous • Parcels must be located in same unique taxing districts (TAG) • Current year and delinquent taxes must be paid on each parcel • If parcels are in a Tax Increment Financing District (TIF), they must be located in the same TIF district • If special assessments are not paid on all parcels, the city/township would need to recertify the special assessments for the new parcel CAUTION Parcels that have been combined cannot be subdivided again without local municipality approval. If located in a township, Carver County Land Management Office must also approve the subdivision. Combined property tax will be Owner (Applicant) Name: Address: 6k& -)l on next year's tax statement TI// P-fJ�C "f eFfLde�/!e Phone Number: eD Parcels to be combined: 6 7*41779k% r 'o// /X,70 zvT z Signature: 1��/ Date: //// & For Office Use Only: Approved Denied By: Reason Denied: G.\PLAN\Forms\Administrative Subdivisions\Administrative subdivision Application to Combine Real Estate Parcels.doc a� Z Z go L] $pe 2 � � °a• � x I 8 s s34 B `1 C�C a 25 E°d i & x 3 I In aE3d i5� =a E j aA i 3 .. e 4 z • a � ° z v � :8 e� 1� 1 3� 3 a E Uj O3 e'ss N 88'fi100 8 92.47 CD 8^. _128.08 f f3,n ti\pou i •tz a � Nxeos �•/4.��i S�EopO f` % • �-\ ' YR iv � �R1J•' \\ _ Fra /� '+l \\ Ri/,_�� /•i / NO u •\/ j I Planning a 3. Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal, and erosion control plans will be Natural Resources September 30, 2005 CITY OF required for Lots 1 and 2 at the time of building permit application. CIIANIIASSEN Ron Harvieux www.ci.chanhassen.ma.us 6605 Horseshoe Curve 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 PC Box 147 may not be allowed to rinse out on site. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Harvieux Addition - Planning Case #05-26 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Dear Mr. Harvieux: Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections This letter is to notify you that on September 29, 2005 the Chanhassen City Phone: 952.227.1180 Council approved the following: Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Preliminary plat and final plat resolution for Harvieux Addition with a variance for Phone: 952.227.1160 the use of flag lots, plans prepared by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc., dated Fax: 952.227.1170 8/04/05, revised stamped received September 12, 2005, based on the findings of fact Finance attached to the staff report and subject to the following conditions: Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 1. Only trees shown on the preliminary plat as being removed shall be allowed No Park s Recreation trees are to be removed on Lot 1. Four trees are allowed to be removed on Lot 2. Phone: 952.227.1120 Any other trees removed shall be replaced at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the grading/clearing limits prior to 2310 e: 52.ter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 anconstruction activities and shall remain in lace until construction is y p Fax: 952.227.1404 complete. Planning a 3. Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal, and erosion control plans will be Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 required for Lots 1 and 2 at the time of building permit application. Fax: 952.227.1110 Development of lot 2 shall incorporate a single -lane construction entrance www.ci.chanhassen.ma.us covered with wood chips, tree protection fencing must line the entrance route Public works 1591 Park Road and a single storage area shall be designated for all materials. Cement trucks Phone: 952.227,1300 may not be allowed to rinse out on site. Fax: 952227.1310 the west off Horseshoe Curve. Senior center 4. The front lot lines for Lots 2 and 3 are the westerly lot lines. Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952227.1110 5. If grading will be done, a final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to Web site the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. www.ci.chanhassen.ma.us 6. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. Relocate Lot 1 sanitary sewer and water services from the northwest off Pleasant View Road to the west off Horseshoe Curve. 7. Addresses for each home must be posted on Horseshoe Curve and on each home. d 1G7 -21c The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a channing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A groat place to live, work, and play. Mr. Ron Harvieux Planning Case No. 05-26 September 30, 2005 Page 2 8. No burning permits will be issued. Trees must either be chipped or removed from site. 9. Builder/Developer must comply with Chanhassen Fre Department Policy #29-1991 regarding premise identification. 10. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tvoe of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can remain open Steeper than 3:1 7 days when the area is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days 11. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed 12. The applicant shall pay the total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording in the amount of $7,558. 13. The developer shall pay full park fees for the two new lots at the time of final plat recording in the amount of $8,000. 14. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA and Watershed District. 15. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. 16. Extend the silt fence to the north along the west side. 17. Add a note to the plan: All sanitary services must be 6 -inch PVC-SDR26 and water service f- inch copper. 18. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 19. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges are applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. 20. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 21. Gutters must be installed on the house on Lot 2 and must discharge to the southwest corner of . 22. Submit a security to ensure that the street cuts are properly restored to City standards. 9 0 Mr. Ron Harvieux Planning Case No. 05-26 September 30, 2005 Page 3 23. The applicant should be aware that any retaining wall more than 4 feet in height must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, it will require a building permit through the City s Building Department. 24. Cleanouts are required at all bends of the sanitary sewer service or every 90 feet, whichever is less. 25. A ten foot drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated along the western property line of Lot 3. 26. A cross -access and maintenance agreement shall be recorded over Lot 3 for the benefit of Lot 46, Pleasant View Addition, for the existing driveway. Two signed mylar copies of the final plat shall be submitted to our office for signatures along with signed access easement and the administrative fees in the amount of $16,163.00. Two 1"=200' scale mylar reductions of the final plat and one 1"=200' scale mylar reductions of the final plat with just street names and lot and block numbers shall be submitted. In addition, a digital copy in Axf format and a digital copy in .tif format (pdf compatible) of the final plat shall be submitted. The City will submit all the necessary documents to Carver County for recording of the subdivision. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (952) 227-1131. S' y Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner ec: Paul Oehme, City Engineer/Public Works Director Steve Torell, Building Official Enclosure X%plan12005 plmning ca m\05-26 hary mbdiv im\appmval Ima.dw r CITY OF CHANHASSEN HARVIEUX ADDITION PROJECT NO. 05-26 BREAKDOWN OF ADMINISTRATION FEES Based on $0 of Estimated Public Improvements 3% of Public Improvement Costs (up to $500,000) Street Lighting Charge (for electricity) 0 Light(s) @ $300.00 Final Plat Process (Attorney Fee for Review of Plat and Easement Document Recording Fees a. Platt Filing b. Driveway Easement Park Fees 2 Lots @ $4000/lot Surface Water Management GIS Fee ($25/plat and $10/parcel) TOTAL ADMINISTRATION FEES gAplan\2005 Planning Case\05-26 Harvieux Addition\Admin Fess $ 450.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 55.00 $ 16,163.00 Engineering Phone: 952.221.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park d Recreation Phone: 952227.1120 Fax 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phase: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.221.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web She www. ci.chanhassen.mn as This letter is to notify you that the city will be unable to complete its review of your project within the 60 day review period that ends September 27, 2005 due to a lack of a quorum for City Council on September 26, 2005. Therefore, I am notifying you that the city is extending its review period for up to an additional 60 days, through November 26, 2005. However, we have rescheduled this item to be heard by City Council on Thursday, September 29, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Chanhassen City Council Chambers. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Sincerely, Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner The City of Chanhassen , A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. CITY OF CIIANHASSEN September 15, 2005 7700 Market Boulevard Mr. Ron Harvieux PBox 147 6605 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1 IM Re: Harvieux Addition Fax: 952.227.1110 Planning Case #05-26 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1100 Dear Mr. Harvieux: Fax: 952227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.221.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park d Recreation Phone: 952227.1120 Fax 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phase: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.221.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web She www. ci.chanhassen.mn as This letter is to notify you that the city will be unable to complete its review of your project within the 60 day review period that ends September 27, 2005 due to a lack of a quorum for City Council on September 26, 2005. Therefore, I am notifying you that the city is extending its review period for up to an additional 60 days, through November 26, 2005. However, we have rescheduled this item to be heard by City Council on Thursday, September 29, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Chanhassen City Council Chambers. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Sincerely, Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner The City of Chanhassen , A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION iE�tT�A Application of Ron Harvieux for the Subdivision of one lot in to three lots with a variance for the use of flag lots — Planning Case 05-26. On September 6, 2005, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Ron Harvieux for preliminary plat approval of property. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential District, RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential — Low Density uses. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition; and that part of Horseshoe Curve, originally dedicated in the record plat of Sathre Addition and now vacated which lies easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of Lot 2, Block 1, in said Sathre Addition; thence southerly, a distance of 84.82 feet, along the westerly line of said Lot 2, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southerly, tangent to the curve on said westerly line, a distance of 53.28 feet; thence southerly, on a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 150.04 feet, to the west line of said Horseshoe Curve 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: (1) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; (2) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; (3) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; (4) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter, SCANNED E (5) The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage; (6) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and (7) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. C. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 5. VARIANCE FINDINGS (Flag Lots) (1) The hardship is not a mere inconvenience, but permits enhanced protection of the wooded areas. (2) The hardship is caused.by the particular physical surroundings, shape or typographical conditions of the land. (3) The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property and a result of the unique history of the property and adjacent right-of-way and development. (4) The granting of the variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of the subdivision ordinance, the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 6. The planning report #05-26 dated September 6, 2005, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat with variances for the use of flag lots. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 6's day of September, 2005. CHANHASSEI�=NIN SSION BY: C` Uli Sacchet, Its Chairman 2 0 0 CITY OF CIMIIASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard July 15, 2005 PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. Ronald E. Harvieux Administration 6605 Horseshoe Curve Phone: 952.227.1100 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Far 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Re: Proposed Metes and Bounds Property Division Phone: 952227.1160 Fax 952.227.1190 Dear Mr. Harvieux: Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Upon review of additional information, it appears that your property does not Fax: 952.227.1170 have frontage on public right-of-way. Resolution #92-84, dated July 27, Finance 1992, vacates the right-of-way adjacent to the southern portion of your Phone: 952.227.1140 property. Therefore, we are unable to process the metes and bounds Fax: 952.227.1110 subdivision request since the development would not meet all the Park lk Recreation requirements of the zoning and subdivision regulations. Plane: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 If you wish to continue with the subdivision process, you would need to Recreation Center request a subdivision of the property with a variance for either the use of a 2310 Coulter Boulevard private street or permitting no frontage on the public road. Please let me Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 know how you wish to proceed. Unless I hear otherwise, I will be requesting that your application fees be refunded to you. Planning i3 Natural Resources If you have an questions or need additional information, lease contact me at Phone, s52.2v.1130 Y Y 9 P Fax: 952.227.1110 (952) 227-1131 or bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Public Works $ln 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Plane: 952.227.1125 Robert Generous, Fax 952.227.1110 Web Site www.d.chanhassen.mn.us SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • 9 growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. City of Chanhassen Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota DATE: July 27, 1992 RESOLUTION NO: 92-84 MOTION BY: Workman SECONDED BY: Wince A RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF HILLSIDE AVENUE, HORSESHOE CURVE AND BALDER AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 412.851 the Chanhassen City Council has conducted a hearing preceded by two (2) weeks published and posted notice to consider the vacation of a portion of Hillside Avenue, Horseshoe Curve and Balder Avenue as described on the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the portion of Hillside Avenue, Horseshoe Curve and Balder Avenue proposed to be vacated does not continue to serve as public right-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen: 1. The above described easement is hereby vacated. However, there is reserved by the city, an easement for utility and drainage purposes over, across, on, under and through said vacation. 2. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor and County Recorder. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 27th day of July, 1992. ATTEST: Don Ashworth, CiEy Clerk/Manager Donald J�' 'Mayor -"L YES Chmiel Mason Dimler _ Wino Workman NO ABSENT None None .XRIPTION FOR: ;;W. . RONALD E. HARVIEUX Prepared By: 61 SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. t {MOIM!{R1 •{UR Y{IOR{• PLANNERS I {OIL T{{TIMO •{MYIROMM[MTAL SERVICE{ , 11$11 •ATIATA ILYO. MI""ITO"RA. YM. 11]•] 11111111-1111 "AI: 111-1111 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION FOR VACATION �P QN That part of Hillside Avenue (now known as Horseshoe Curve), originally dedicated in the record plat of "PLEASANT VIEW" and now to be vacated, which LA lies easterly and southeasterly of a line 30.00 feet easterly and southeasterly of the easterly and southeasterly line of Lot 2, Block 1, STEVENS ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. Ra`ALxf That part of Horseshoe Curve, originally dedicated in the record plat of SATHRE ADDITION and now to be vacated which lies easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, in said SATHRE ADDITION; thence southerly, a distance of 84.82 feet, along the westerly line of said Lot 2, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southerly, tangent to the curve on said westerly line, a distance of 53.28 feet; thence southerly, on a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 150.04 feet, to the west line of said Horseshoe Curve. n /Q Date: September 30, 1992_ Theodore D. Kemna Land Surveyor MN Lic. No. 17006 X Q 1 \y Xsa ��1 Ir- v W ^moi 2 aT Y N 7 • N L J y w � Ny... .. N d C o� � 4 Q J i YL �. i •.• h ro a z c a ) 0 'A o a en bvro Z o Q } ° e9^O'er \\ di LU 0 09 ' •.. .. X06 V M„ n7 '� �\ \ r v �T \.✓ r � Off' • � �,i � � V �. � i� M CCO � '��" „rte N ., �•� 10 vQti........................... \� ' \ .......'a ; No XZ0 0 CDs` m ap a N ; cr r 47 T.0 T Ani- ze—s= Engineering EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • • 5 ClllOF MEMORANDUM CgAUSEN TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Phone: 952.227.1140 revised the plat to comply with ordinance requirements. In revising the plat, the Fax: 952.227.1110 7760 Markel Boulevard FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner PC Box 147 development. Fax: 952.227.1110 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Recreation Center ACTION REQUIRED 2310 Coulter Boulevard DATE: September 29, 2005 Administration Fax 952.227.1404 City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. Phone: 952.227.1100 SUBJ: Request for Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition (6605 Fax: 952 227.1110 Fax: 952.227.1110 Horseshoe Curve) into 3 lots with Variances for flag lots Building Inspections the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 to approve the Planning Case #05-26 Phone. 952227.1180 Phone: 952.227.1300 September 26, 2005 City Council packet. Fax 952.227 1190 Engineering EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Phone: 952.227.1160 the site development for Lot 2. Staff recommends that one route be chosen for Fax: 952.227.1176 The property owners are requesting preliminary and final plat approval to subdivide Finance their lot into three lots with variances for the use of flag lots. The applicant has Phone: 952.227.1140 revised the plat to comply with ordinance requirements. In revising the plat, the Fax: 952.227.1110 applicant has maintained the location of the common lot line between Lots 1 and 2 Park A Recreation pursuant to Planning Commission direction. Staff is recommending approval of the Phone: 952227 1120 development. Fax: 952.227.1110 off the root area by using conveyor pipes to transport cement. Mixing trucks must Recreation Center ACTION REQUIRED 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952 227,1400 Fax 952.227.1404 City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present. Punning 8 Natural Resources MIPLANNING COMSSION SUMMARY Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 6, 2005, to review Public Worcs the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 to approve the 1591 Park Road proposed project. The Planning Commission minutes are included as item I of the Phone: 952.227.1300 September 26, 2005 City Council packet. Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center One of the issues the Planning Commission had was preserving the trees as part of Phone: 952.227.1125 the site development for Lot 2. Staff recommends that one route be chosen for Fax 952.2271110 construction traffic to minimize the overall extent of the impact on the trees. This Web site single -lane route should later become the driveway for the home. Tree protection wwwci.chanhassen.mn.us fencing must line the route to prevent encroachment onto protected areas. For the route, staff recommends that several inches of wood chips be spread the length of the drive route — from street to home site. This depth must be maintained throughout the entire construction process. Heavy mixing trucks could be kept off the root area by using conveyor pipes to transport cement. Mixing trucks must never be allowed to rinse out on site. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geat place to live, work, and play. Todd Gerhardt • Harvieux Addition Planning Case No. 05-26 September 29, 2005 Page 2 of 2 The home site should also employ tree protection practices such as designating a single storage area for all materials and installing tree protection fencing at the perimeter of the construction and storage areas. If construction is done during the growing season, preserved trees along the drive and home site should be watered regularly. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the motion approving the subdivision with variance, as modified, beginning on page 7 in the staff report dated September 6, 2005. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution. 2. Reduced Copy Final Plat Stamped Received September 12, 2005. 3. Revised Preliminary Plat Stamped Received September 12, 2005. 4. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated September 6, 2005. gAplant2005 planning ma X05-26 harvieux subdivision\executive summary harvieuxAm CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: September 29, 2005 MOTION BY: RESOLUTION NO: 2005 - SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT CREATING HARVIEUX ADDITION, RONALD AND LEANNE HARVIEUX WHEREAS, Ronald and Leanne Harvieux have requested a subdivision of their property into three single family lots of 15,064 square feet, 24,340 square feet and 47,087 square feet with variances for the use of neck lots; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision complies with all requirements of the Chanhassen City Code; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 6, 2005, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance and recommended approval of the subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby approves the final plat for Harvieux Addition (Planning Case #05-23) for the Harvieux property, legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition; and that part of Horseshoe Curve, originally dedicated in the record plat of Sathre Addition and now vacated which lies easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, in said Sathre Addition; thence southerly, a distance of 84.82 feet, along the westerly line of said Lot 2, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southerly, tangent to the curve on said westerly line, a distance of 53.28 feet; thence southerly, on a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 150.04 feet, to the west line of said Horseshoe Curve, creating Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Harvieux Addition as shown on the plans received September 12, 2005, prepared by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc., subject to the following conditions: Only trees shown on the preliminary plat as being removed shall be allowed. No trees are to be removed on Lot 1. Four trees are allowed to be removed on Lot 2. Any other trees removed shall be replaced at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. 2. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the grading/clearing limits prior to any construction activities and shall remain in place until construction is complete. 3. Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal, and erosion control plans will be required for Lots 1 and 2 at the time of building permit application. Development of lot 2 shall incorporate a single -lane construction entrance covered with wood chips, tree protection fencing must line the entrance route and a single storage area shall be designated for all materials. Cement trucks may not be allowed to rinse out on site. Heavy mixing trucks should use conveyor pipes to transport cement. 0 0 4. The front lot lines for Lots 2 and 3 are the westerly lot lines. 5. If grading will be done, a final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 6. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. Relocate Lot 1 sanitary sewer and water services from the northwest off Pleasant View Road to the west off Horseshoe Curve. 7. Addresses for each home must be posted on Horseshoe Curve and on each home. 8. No burning permits will be issued. Trees must either be chipped or removed from site. 9. Builder/Developer must comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #29-1991 regarding premise identification. 10. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tvae of Slone Time (Maximuin time an area can remain open Steeper than 3:1 7 days when the area is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days 11. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed 12. The applicant shall pay the total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording in the amount of $7,558. 13. The developer shall pay full park fees for the two new lots at the time of final plat recording in the amount of $8,000. 14. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA and Watershed District. 15. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. 16. Extend the silt fence to the north along the west side. 17. Add a note to the plan: All sanitary services must be 6 -inch PVC-SDR26 and water service f- inch copper. 18. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 19. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges are applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. 20. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 21. Gutters must be installed on the house on Lot 2 and must discharge to the southwest comer of the lot. 22. Submit a security to ensure that the street cuts are properly restored to City standards. 23. The applicant should be aware that any retaining wall more than 4 feet in height must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, it will require a building permit through the City's Building Department. 24. Cleanouts are required at all bends of the sanitary sewer service or every 90 feet, whichever is less. 25. A ten foot drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated along the western property line of Lot 3. 26. A cross -access and maintenance agreement shall be recorded over Lot 3 for the benefit of Lot 46, Pleasant View Addition, for the existing driveway. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 29`s day September of 2005. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager YES NO &Aplan\2005 planning case5\05-23 harvieuz subdivisionhwolu[ionAm Tom Furlong, Mayor ABSENT w 1A ZW QW UW O¢ U $ = s R R 2 3 sit $ {{a a f F 5 Hjj E � $"6 E id 43�3 ➢ 3 �� 5 @ By 8 g $88] {{FF 5 O d p as � a i5 yE$ gefi e' LLI CD N ZQ 3 i $ j R¢ -5 Es �Y z ss g^ 6$ $ 3 CQ1-4 e;LLJ easy r=� g e N W17-000"92.47 164. 184.0 _ � f 97.44 I�\ 1-4 CQ AV\ _126.09 _ / r— — i ✓ s � XOR7N � z If `y / / /_ ^E ♦ pii %'� / 5®rgu d N 6 ecq ase; A ��ATM �CtttAl� Pt?()PERTY "WWT� 'o,O � . - M�so. R. L. 2. flloL� 1. �.E �f. COWO � - 353's ..-. CLWO Aof` - Lm TO W W&POtfl) .1 . 10 w W.O�ff) - J.. TO i,,,,s WM) -'T M., �OM 12 :2: fUl ., .� . 1. - L..- 13: 2 EW LOT J MiA 47,M7 &L ff. - J..21� RL a. Lot 2. 00�� To ,L. ux i,r ('.o. o, o. ..;d -1.� To, t. -o .1 M,.., So— f-,/, 15.05, S� 1. Lot 2,1.�� 1-1 rm. F-1 L fol r > A T.� 5.3 i6w - I It 1Y 11 A I EXI JW5 PRO�SEV HVI)COVER Lot i 2543 - - - - - - - - 0.. 1� �Ft 221� 1.1 2 (N.1 koo) 2810 SoFt. pfif,oa &," Oi,a x ttordc— Lot 2 M00 WVYY ��Ts 2810 S~IT H'\ ASSr OF C &,Oa sort RECEIiD G,- 24� 5,ft X & 1�o— 241Z 2005 E-i,to, �.— Lot 3 to-../Oo, 2 4-71 —o— ANHASSEN PLANNING M 4.1 �,l 111. SEE SHEET 2 OF- 2 FOR CITY OF CHANHASSEN DETAIL PLATES TO 1� 1. �Al OF DEM"S-GABRIEL LT. - AND qIIRVEYOMV. INC. L 30.1 loo� PRELIMINARY RON 11ARVIFITY PLAT (360.5 Ifors"hoe cui-tv 11ARVIP[W ADDITION 'Ifilillf-s"(.1 1.111, 1z t, 1,�- SCANUM CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PC DA*: September 6, 2005 [5] CC DATE: September 26, 2005 September 29, 2005 REVIEW DEADLINE: September 27, 2005 Extended to November 26, 2005 CASE #: 05-26 BY: RG, LH, ML, AM, 7S, ST PROPOSAL: Request for Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition (6605 Horseshoe Curve) into 3 lots with Variances for flag lots. LOCATION: 6605 Horseshoe Curve APPLICANT: Ron Harvieux 6605 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, MN 55317 PRESENT ZONING: Single -Family Residential District, RSF 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential — Low Density ACREAGE: 1.99 acres DENSITY: Gross/Net: 1.51 unitstacre SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting subdivision approval to create three lots with variances for two of the lots to be flag lots. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Subdivision Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Location Map Harvieux Subdivision Planning Case No. 05-26 6605 Horseshoe Curve City of Chanhassen na leasant View RMd pleasant View 4 �n o a O� Q LL /' °# h°rlow Drive ou rs ylolbw e o God } s y K msmn� � o Foxtail D°°� � o S? e a Y aY o+ U m Subject Site Lotus Lake 11 $CFNNED Harvieux Subdivision • Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 2 of 10 PROPOSAUSUMMARY The property owners are proposing the subdivision of their lot into three lots, adding two lots north of the existing home. The existing house (Lot 3) will be accessed via the existing shared driveway with the property to the west through a short neck that connects to the public street. Lot 1 has full frontage on Horseshoe Curve. Lot 2 is accessed via an approximately 40 -foot neck area. The property owner proposed this wider area to permit a driveway to meander along its length, preserving three 34 -inch oaks. Staff is recommending that the driveway location for this lot be moved as far south at the street as possible, while still preserving the significant oaks. The northern portion of the property is densely wooded. Lots 1 and 2 will be custom graded at the time of building the individual homes. Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal, and erosion control plans will be required for each of the lots at the time of building permit application. • North and east of the site are single-family homes within the Sathre Addition. To the south is Lotus Lake. West of the site is a single-family home within Pleasant View Addition, Horseshoe Curve and a portion of Pleasant View Road. The site slopes from a high point of 958 in the north central portion of the site westerly to an elevation of 948 at the intersection of Pleasant View Road and Horseshoe Curve, easterly to an elevation of 932 at the property line, and southerly to a low of 898 near the lake. Lotus Lake has an ordinary high water elevation of 896.3. Sewer and water are available to the property. Access shall be via Horseshoe Curve. At one time, the entire parcel had frontage on dedicated street right-of-way (Horseshoe Curve and Balder Avenue). However, over time, this right-of-way has been vacated and the property owner was advised that they would not need it for street frontage purposes as part of a subdivision of the property because the ordinance at that time permitted up to four homes to access via a private street Currently, the City Code requires variance approval for the use of private streets and flag lots. Staff is recommending approval of the development subject to the conditions of approval. -- 444 a -'Li ➢R➢.YNINMY ➢UT ROOM HMV6UY I �$� NRVI6fR IOOISION � '�jp �y North and east of the site are single-family homes within the Sathre Addition. To the south is Lotus Lake. West of the site is a single-family home within Pleasant View Addition, Horseshoe Curve and a portion of Pleasant View Road. The site slopes from a high point of 958 in the north central portion of the site westerly to an elevation of 948 at the intersection of Pleasant View Road and Horseshoe Curve, easterly to an elevation of 932 at the property line, and southerly to a low of 898 near the lake. Lotus Lake has an ordinary high water elevation of 896.3. Sewer and water are available to the property. Access shall be via Horseshoe Curve. At one time, the entire parcel had frontage on dedicated street right-of-way (Horseshoe Curve and Balder Avenue). However, over time, this right-of-way has been vacated and the property owner was advised that they would not need it for street frontage purposes as part of a subdivision of the property because the ordinance at that time permitted up to four homes to access via a private street Currently, the City Code requires variance approval for the use of private streets and flag lots. Staff is recommending approval of the development subject to the conditions of approval. 11 Harvieux Subdivision Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 3 of 10 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article III, "RSF" Single -Family Residential District Chapter 20, Article VII, Shoreland Management District BACKGROUND On February 12, 1990, the Chanhassen City Council approved a partial vacation of unimproved Balder Avenue located to the west of the site (Vacation #90-1). On July 23, 1990, the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat for Sathre Addition creating three lots. This parcel was incorporated in that plat because Mr. Sathre had a 15 -foot wide strip of land that separated this parcel from the public street (Subdivision #89-20). On September 19,1991, the Chanhassen City Council_ granted a 17 -foot variance from the 75 -foot shoreland setback for the purpose of constructing a deck (Variance #91-09). On July 27, 1992, the Chanhassen City Council approved resolution #92-84 vacating a portion of Hillside Avenue, Horseshoe Curve and Balder Avenue right-of-way adjacent to the parcel (Vacation #92-05). The staff report at the time read, in part, as follows: "In 1990, when the applicants first applied for the vacation of Balder Avenue, staff recommended that the northerly portion of the road remain as public right-of-way. The reason for this was should Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre's Addition be subdivided, it would have adequate street frontage as the zoning ordinance requires 90 feet of street frontage per single family lot. However, since that time, the City adopted an ordinance allowing up to four parcels to be served by a private driveway. This eliminates the need of retaining the public street frontage on Balder Avenue as the existing driveway serving Lot 2, Block 1 could be utilized to service any newly created parcels." STREETS/ACCESS The plan does not show any public street improvement, it proposes accessing the lots via a private driveway access from the northeast corner of the parcel off Pleasant View Road and Horseshoe Curve. Staff recommends relocating Lot 2 driveway access to the south along Lot 1 north property line, to create more separation from the northern parcel existing access. In order to permit flag lots, the City must find that the following conditions exist (section 18-57 (q) of the Chanhassen City Code): a. The prevailing development pattern makes it unfeasible or inappropriate to construct a public/private street. In making this determination, the City may consider the location of existing property lines and homes, local or geographic conditions and the existence of wetlands. Extension of a public/private street to the two new homes would significantly impact the densely wooded area on the property. 0 0 Harvieux Subdivision Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 4 of 10 b. After reviewing the surrounding area, it is concluded that an extension of the public or a private street system is not required to serve other parcels in the area, improve access, or to provide a street system consistent with the comprehensive plan. Public streets are not necessary to access the property to the east, which is currently developed with single- family homes and accessed via Pleasant View Road. c. The use of the flag lot will permit enhanced protection of the City's natural resources including wetlands and forested areas. The flag lot permits the driveway to meander preserving three significant oaks. LANDSCAPING/TREE PRESERVATION Tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations for the subdivision are as follows: Total upland area (including outlots) 86,491 SF or 1.98 ac. Baseline canopy coverage 75% (65533 SF) Minimum canopy coverage allowed 46% or 39,785 SF Proposed tree preservation 59% or 51,133 SF Developer meets minimum canopy coverage allowed. A minimum of one tree is required in the front yard setback area of each lot. Only trees shown on the preliminary plat as being removed shall be allowed. Any other trees removed shall be replaced at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. Bufferyard plantings are required along Pleasant View Road on Lot 2. The length is forty feet and it is necessary to locate the driveway within this area. The applicant is proposing to save a 34" oak in this area and the house for this lot will be set back over 160 feet. No further bufferyard plantings are required along Pleasant View Road on Lot 2. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN This site is wholly within the neighborhood park service area of North Lotus Lake Park. This park offers a wide variety of amenities including tennis courts, ball fields, a children's playground, picnic shelter, lighted hockey and open skating rinks, open space and a walking trail. Residents of Harvieux Addition will access the park via Pleasant View Road. It should be noted that sidewalks are not available. No additional parkland dedication is required in this area of the City; therefore, park dedication dollars will be required in lieu of land dedication for the two new lots (2 lots X $4,000 per lot = $8,000). COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN No sidewalks or trails are currently available along Pleasant View Road. It is unlikely that these amenities will be constructed in the future even though a pedestrian route along Pleasant View Road is identified in the Comprehensive Plan. No additional trail construction is being recommended as a condition of this development. Harvieux Subdivision • Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 5 of 10 GRADINGIDRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL The existing site is heavily wooded with tree cover over approximately 80% of area with an existing house. The plans propose to grade about 9% to create two new house pads and a proposed private driveway access of Horseshoe Curve for Lot 1 and off Pleasant View Road for Lot 2. The proposed grading will prepare the site for full walkout house pads. Drainage swales have been proposed along the sides of the houses to maintain the neighborhood drainage pattern through the property. The existing site drainage is encompassed within two different drainage areas. The site drains off site to the southeast and southwest directions toward Lotus Lake. The applicant is utilizing the existing grade contour and is not proposing any storm sewer system. Over all, staff is fine with the proposed grading but has some concerns on the grades along the east side of the parcel that may affect the existing house on the east of the parcel. As such, staff would recommend the installation of gutters on the house on Lot 2 discharging drainage to the southwest corner. The plan proposes retaining walls for the driveway access on Lots I and 2. The applicant should be aware that any retaining wall over 4 feet in height must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, it will require a building permit from the Building Department. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, shall be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. Erosion Control Erosion control blanket should be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas should have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area Steeper than 3:1 7 days is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days Silt fencing should be installed as detailed on the proposed plan. The existing erosion control fence drawing should be replaced with City of Chanhassen Detail Plate 5300. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets should include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. Harvieux Subdivision • Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 6 of 10 Shoreland Management District The proposed subdivision is within 1,000 feet of the Lotus Lake OHW of 896.3. Within the Shoreland Management district, the impervious surface coverage cannot exceed 25 percent. Currently, Lot 2 shows impervious surface coverage at 24.5 percent. This allows only an additional 117.75 square feet of additional impervious surface on Lot 2 before the 25 percent impervious coverage limit is reached. The installation of additional hard surfaces may cause Lot 2 to exceed the impervious coverage limit. Surface Water Manaeement Fees Water Quality Fees Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this proposed development are based on single-family residential development rates of $1,093/acre. Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 1.99 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are $2,175. Water Quantity Fees The SWAP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average cit - wide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Single- family residential developments have a connection charge of $2,705 per developable acre. This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $5,383 for the proposed development. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $7,558. UTILITIES No public utility improvement is proposed as the applicant is proposing to extend the water and sanitary services from City sewer and watermain off Pleasant View Road for Lot 2 and off Horseshoe Curve for Lot 1. The developer must submit a security to ensure that the street cuts are properly restored to City standards. According to the City's Finance Department records, the parcel was previously assessed for one sanitary sewer and water hookup. However, the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will still be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. 0 0 Harvieux Subdivision Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 7 of 10 Standard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated over the front, side and rear yards within the subdivision. A cross -access and maintenance agreement shall be recorded over Lot 3 for the benefit of Lot 46, Pleasant View Addition for the existing driveway. COMPLIANCE TABLE The front lot lines for Lots 2 and 3 are the westerly lot lines. Lot width on neck or flag lots and lots accessed by private streets shall be 100 feet as measured at the front building setback line. Neck/flag lots must, by definition, be a minimum of 30 feet wide. The applicant ekail revised the plat to incorporate a 30 -foot neck for Lot 3. This vAA resulted in the reconfiguration of Lot 1 and possibly Lot 2 as well in order to maintain the minimum required lot areas. Staff recommends that the Pinfining G@wAni City Council adopt the following motion: "The Chanhassen City Council approves the preliminary plat and final plat resolution for Harvieux Addition with a variance for the use of flag lots, plans prepared by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc., dated 8/04/05, revised stamped received September 12, 2005, based on the findings of fact attached to this report and subject to the following conditions: 1. Only trees shown on the preliminary plat as being removed shall be allowed. No trees are to be removed on Lot 1. Four trees are allowed to be removed on Lot 2. Any other trees removed shall be replaced at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. 2. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the grading/clearing limits prior to any construction activities and shall remain in place until construction is complete. Area (square Frontage Depth (feet) Setbacks: Net Lot Area feet) (feet) front, side, excluding rear, lake neck (square (feet) feet) Code 15,000; 90; 100 for 125 30, 10, 30, 75 20,000 lake flag lot lot Lot 1 15,064 97492.7 138 1 30, 10, 30, na NA Lot 2 49-,94 24,340 4" 151 (flag) 149 30, 10, 30, na 18,442 sq. ft. Lot 3 1 4',364 47,087 2" 238 (flag) 234 30, 10, 30,75 46,441 ft. Total 1 86,491 The front lot lines for Lots 2 and 3 are the westerly lot lines. Lot width on neck or flag lots and lots accessed by private streets shall be 100 feet as measured at the front building setback line. Neck/flag lots must, by definition, be a minimum of 30 feet wide. The applicant ekail revised the plat to incorporate a 30 -foot neck for Lot 3. This vAA resulted in the reconfiguration of Lot 1 and possibly Lot 2 as well in order to maintain the minimum required lot areas. Staff recommends that the Pinfining G@wAni City Council adopt the following motion: "The Chanhassen City Council approves the preliminary plat and final plat resolution for Harvieux Addition with a variance for the use of flag lots, plans prepared by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc., dated 8/04/05, revised stamped received September 12, 2005, based on the findings of fact attached to this report and subject to the following conditions: 1. Only trees shown on the preliminary plat as being removed shall be allowed. No trees are to be removed on Lot 1. Four trees are allowed to be removed on Lot 2. Any other trees removed shall be replaced at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. 2. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the grading/clearing limits prior to any construction activities and shall remain in place until construction is complete. 0 • Harvieux Subdivision Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 8 of 10 3. Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal, and erosion control plans will be required for Lots 1 and 2 at the time of building permit application. Development of lot 2 shall incorporate a single -lane construction entrance covered with wood chips, tree protection fencing must line the entrance route and a single storage area shall be designated for all materials. Cement trucks may not be allowed to rinse out on site. Heavy mixing trucks should use conveyor pipes to transport cement. 4. The front lot lines for Lots 2 and 3 are the westerly lot lines. ... - -• - - - - - -- - - 6. If grading will be done, a final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. Relocate Lot 1 sanitary sewer and water services from the northwest off Pleasant View Road to the west off Horseshoe Curve. 8. Addresses for each home must be posted on Horseshoe Curve and on each home. 9. No burning permits will be issued. Trees must either be chipped or removed from site. 10. Builder/Developer must comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #29-1991 regarding premise identification. 11. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: TTyW of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can remain open Steeper than 3:1 7 days when the area is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days 13. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed 141 Any haM suFfo@@s .g.• 0 0 Harvieux Subdivision Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 9 of 10 16. The applicant shall pay the total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recordin . in the amount of $7,558. 17. The developer shall pay full park fees for the two new lots at the time of final plat recording in the amount of $8,000. 18. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, and Watershed District. 20. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. 21. Extend the silt fence to the north along the west side. 22. Add a note to the plan: All sanitary services must be 6 -inch PVC-SDR26 and water service f- inch copper. 23. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 24. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges are applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. 25. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 26. . 27. Gutters must be installed on the house on Lot 2 and must discharge to the southwest comer of the lot. 28. Submit a security to ensure that the street cuts are properly restored to City standards. 29. The applicant should be aware that any retaining wall more than 4 feet in height must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, it will require a building permit through the City's Building Department. 30.I - 3 a 31. Cleanouts are required at all bends of the sanitary sewer service or every 90 feet, whichever is less. 32. _ . Harvieux Subdivision Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 10 of 10 33. A ten foot drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated along the western property line of Lot 3. 34. A cross -access and maintenance agreement shall be recorded over Lot 3 for the benefit of Lot 46, Pleasant View Addition, for the existing driveway. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Development Review Application 3. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing 4. Rationale for Subdivision — Harvieux Addition 5. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat 6. Memo to Robert Generous from Mark Littfin dated 8/10/05 gAplant2005 planing cnm\05-26 harvieux subdivisim\staHrep4t harvie"Am 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION Application of Ron Harvieux for the Subdivision of one lot in to three lots with a variance for the use of flag lots — Planning Case 05-26. On September 6, 2005, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Ron Harvieux for preliminary plat approval of property. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential District, RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential — Low Density uses. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition; and that part of Horseshoe Curve, originally dedicated in the record plat of Sathre Addition and now vacated which lies easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, in said Sathre Addition; thence southerly, a distance of 84.82 feet, along the westerly line of said Lot 2, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southerly, tangent to the curve on said westerly line, a distance of 53.28 feet; thence southerly, on a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 150.04 feet, to the west line of said Horseshoe Curve 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: (1) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; (2) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; (3) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; (4) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter, 0 0 (5) The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage; (6) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and (7) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. C. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 5. VARIANCE FINDINGS (Fla¢ Lots) (1) The hardship is not a mere inconvenience, but permits enhanced protection of the wooded areas. (2) The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or typographical conditions of the land. (3) The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property and a result of the unique history of the property and adjacent right-of-way and development. (4) The granting of the variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of the subdivision ordinance, the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 6. The planning report #05-26 dated September 6, 2005, prepared by Robert Generous, eta], is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat with variances for the use of flag lots. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 6`s day of September, 2005. CHANHASSEN PLANNING BY: Uli Sacchet, Its Chairman rLCAJt VNIN1 • • Planning Case No. b S - (o CITY OF CHANHASSEN clrY OF RECEIVEDSSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 AUG 5 2005 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CHANHASSENPLANNINGDEPT App' ant N e and Address: Owner Name and Address: Contact: dYl Contact: Phone: q52 �7¢ 'z,02 -Fax: — Phone: Fax: Email: (® a lik <ge' Email: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development' Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review* Subdivision' Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements XVariance 2-00 Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign'* - $75 + $100 Damage Deposit I?t3— X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost*** la o - $50 CUP/SPR/VACNAR/WAP/MeteS & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 111" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital cop v in TIFF -Group 4 ('.tif) format. " Applicant to obtain notification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. " Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT N LOCATION: 0 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LO// 2 A�2lo�,F TOTALACREAGE: WETLANDS PRESENT: YES NO PRESENT ZONING:s7z:� REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: `t i This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proce th the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. e � 51�S Date Date G:\plan\t s\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 4/05 i iat10,04 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Todd Gerhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that he is and was on August 25, 2005, the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date he caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Harvieux Subdivision with Variances — Planning Case No. 05-26 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and swQm to before me thi day of 2005. T I Notary P lic ` KIM T. MEUWI�nmN �. Notary Publ'1c-Mi K 2 -� My Commission E, , 2010 Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, September 6 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition Proposal: (6605 Horseshoe Curve) into three lots with Variances — HARVIEUX SUBDIVISION Planning File: 05-26 Applicant: Ronald Harvieux Property Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition (6605 Horseshoe Curve) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous at 952-227.1131 or Questions & e-mail b ec nerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at htto://206.10.76.6tweblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendatlon. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included In the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Date & Time: Tuesday, September 6, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition Proposal: (6605 Horseshoe Curve) into three lots with Variances — HARVIEUX SUBDIVISION Planning File: 05-26 Applicant: Ronald Harvieux Property Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition (6605 Horseshoe Curve) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project, 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous at 952-227.1131 or Questions & e-mail bcenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at htto://206.10.76.6/weblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council, The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciatnndustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersontrepresentative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council, If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Stab person named on the notification. Lotus Lake Subject Site This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. The map is a connotation of records, inforetion and data located in various city, county, state and lederal offices and other sources reganing the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that Me Geographic Inlmnation System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error tree, and Me City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigations. tracidng or any other purpose requiring exacting mewummem of distance or direction or precision in the depict. d geographic features. n errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subtl. 21 (2000), antl the user Of this map acknovAedges that the City shall not be liable In any damages, end expressly waives all claim, and agrees to defend, indenmify, and hold harmiss Me City from any and all claim brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the users access or use of data providetl. Lotus Lake Subject Site This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended Io be used as one. This mp is a compilation of records, iMmna rid and data located in various city, county. state ant federal offices and Other sources regarding Me area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes orgy. The City does not warrant Mat the Geographic Infmration System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent Mat the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracidng or any other purpose requiring exacting measurenent of distance or direction or precision In Me depicum of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952.227.1107. The preceding diWernar is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §666.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and Me user Of this map acknovAedges that the City shall not be liable for any daneges, antl expressly waives all claim, ora agrees to defend, indarrnity, and had hamgess Me City from any and all dame brought by User, its ennloyeas or agents, or third parties which arise out of the users access or use of data provided. «NAME7» «NAME2» «ADDt» ((ADD2» «CITY» « STATE» « ZIP» ((Next Record))«NAME1» «NAME2» ADD1 «ADD2» «CITY» ((STATE,, «ZIP)) 0 0 Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Harvieux Subdivision Planning Case No. 05-26 6605 Horseshoe Curve City of Chanhassen Subject Site Lotus Lake 0 0 TRURICIASTEE A F TRU EMILY H JOHNSON NICHOLAS J P PERKINS TRUSTEE OF TRUST MN 55438 335 PLEASANT VIEW RD 339 PLEASANT VIEW RD BLOOMINGTON MN 11010 OREGON CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHRISTOPHER D ARNOLDY & KALLEY T YANTA MICHELE F ARNOLDY TRUSTEE OF TRUST BASIL LAWRENCE TIVY 350 PLEASANT VIEW RD 365 PLEASANT VIEW RD 370 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 553D 17 DONALD J & DARLENE M MILLER GARY W & MARY ANN MCCAULEY JAMES T & DIANE S LESTOR 395 PLEASANT VIEW RD 420 PLEASANT VIEW RD 429 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CBR DEVELOPMENT LLC KELBIN ROBERT BAILEY RONALD E & LEANNE HARVIEUX 4550 WESTON LN N 6580 PLEASANT VIEW WAY TRUSTEES OF TRUST PLYMOUTH MN 55446 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 6605 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANN DANIELSON RAYMOND P & ALICIA L BROZOVICH JOSEPH M & MARGERY M 6607 HORSESHOE CRV 6609 HORSESHOE CRV PFANKUCH CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 6611 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVEN M GULLICKSON & DAVID W SANTANA & JENNIFER H GULLICKSON DEBRA C SCHULTZ STEPHEN J & JEANNIE L WANEK 6613 HORSESHOE CRV 6614 HORSESHOE CRV O E CRV 6615 HORSESHOE CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 5RV CHANHASSEN 5317 ROBERT L & ELVA HANSEN LADD R & SUSAN M CONRAD RICHARD R & KATHLEEN E PECK 6620 HORSESHOE CRV 6625 HORSESHOE CRV 6690 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANDREW H & KATRINA E CLEMENS CHARLES C & JANET C HURD SANDRA LEE OLSON 6691 HORSESHOE CRV 6695 HORSESHOE CRV 6696 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JOHN R & CAROL W HAMMETT BRACE D HELGESON 6697 HORSESHOE CRV 7820 TERREY PINE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 0 Rationale For Subdivision — Harvieux Addition The following provides our rationale for the Harvieux subdivision being proposed to the City of Chanhassen. This parcel is currently known as "Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition + part of vacated Baldur Avenue + part of vacated Horseshoe Curve". Note that the vacations mentioned here were completed and recorded in 1990 and 1992 respectively, At that time, City Staff suggested current ordinances eliminated the need to retain this public street frontage for potential future subdivision of this parcel, which is the proposal that is being discussed here. The subdivision involves dividing the existing 1.99 acre parcel into 3 separate residential building lots. City sewer and water connections to service 2 of these lots were put in place in the late 1970's, and were assessed and paid for by the current owner when this parcel was purchased in 1980. A connection for the 3rd lot will be needed. A survey by Schoell & Madson in 2003 determined that there are no bluffs on this parcel. Great care has been and will be taken to preserve the natural beauty of the lots, including tree cover and views. New structures being proposed are congruent with current topography, which will minimize grading and disruption of the existing conditions on the land. The lots proposed are as follows: Lot #1: This is proposed to be a 15,152 buildable sq ft lot with 97.5 ft of frontage on Horseshoe Curve, a public right-of-way. There are no variances involved with the creation of this lot. Hardcover proposed for this lot is at 22.2%. Lot #2: This is a 18,442 buildable sq ft lot that includes an additional 5,533 sq ft of neck lot that holds the driveway necessary to service the house site. The neck lot requires a variance. While the City allows a 30 ft neck lot in appropriate situations, we are proposing a larger 40 ft neck so that 3 existing large oak trees can be saved and incorporated into the driveway area. We feel that maintaining these leaf covers and aesthetics are especially important since a neighbor's home (Don & Darlene Miller, 395 Pleasant View Road) is set back approximately 20 ft from the border of the neck lot. The neck lot/driveway is proposed to be where it is because it provides the most rational access to the building lot in conjunction with the lay of the land and the needs of the other 2 lots in the parcel. Hardcover proposed for this lot is 23.7% on the "buildable" area, and 24.5% on the total area. Lot #3: This is a 47,364 sq ft lot which holds our current house, outbuilding and driveway. The driveway access to this lot requires a variance. Note that this is the parcel that was fronted by approximately 155 ft of Horseshoe Curve before that portion of the public roadway was vacated in 1992. In our proposal, we have 40 ft of frontage on Horseshoe Curve for this lot, which is essentially the paved driveway that provides access to both this and a neighbor's lot (Ann Danielson, 6607 Horseshoe Curve), and which has existed for over 40 years. SCANNED E E / 'f j� :�RI'�?w'J/YA�r'N fN �4(AtRM: r prp{pn (Cyww lnw / lfWlrS 11R M C( RYh[O 0Y3(I�CNp'� fr14(G AqA - 3jJIB 50. !I Np A _cwv. luYP Aoo - .m sn R. nr r.+ r ww c.r. Iq¢s ro rt n. Yw[n cwn, «u M er .lYllm - ]wo so. n „y pP r sPYYY wn�a`�9me �. r°e0e�4�an.'�e / � R -I} rIY 'W w' ARA M MYYI - JI.)I! 41 R. (Ot IF 91(J weT y. wwNIJ y a F N..�iee w a / ` � /.-�! rw fP'aIP/ fwpr fPNY NSA - 1,J13 f4 R. wi^✓1. a eda+� x nM NpA . 4JYJ ]rA Ii. P.,9} feel tlw+q W wry N NI` lq }, e m / ✓!O'+ MA � nYW - Y(ali 50. R. (JWL T SI[) vYvy, Imw^� is � aerie eM / � ♦ u z - nJa sww. rwr Jwr .wI NT \ , � � �%j�l _ -®!1 � �•�" ,� 1 � I I 1 I 1 fly / � / I Sri pit tv NOUSK 1 11 1 �, >• I` Iw,p\J , . ;♦.Y� ; 1' � I ' ; I / YYwu c(wr<uulio. / �—�'� { J •lo � ` y-1 �`J 9Z,7 ` TT �Z'�-J !•J%1/ / I �iJ / a... a r .7M.a. xlwdc.r (N} noNsif. nawrew... w x.J Aw. law} soR \ / 11 1 / / � ♦14..`{{"��oo�} raa..N bl zc,w. Ane � 1' j. // � / p!` twxYz No ulam us[(crJrs w,eti Iv s ✓ x.Paw _ aAse fFJ4Gw carFa �� Ir + ' -�J L 1-- SrmN 14P./! }N SSR 6M N}I yR w fpf 14MpN !yl $yR Itl Arw J)MJ 3eI( ' Sylbew,Y - 33 NY1Pti11�I�N Ys0 mp q..�-N N+w r w r Mwlrnr i4' Yl Obi fA4rG.R.W[ N Y r,.,r.y. w� M®:np N eC RYL MI6 xYMLUi .9pv-v DEMARS-DARRIEL ' "w.' �rd "P"'" "" •'•• :.( yam,+..�.r rw. I�'� PfRiwlm rdf: L D SURVEYORS, INC. a3n Ymu [dN F> t�� PRELIMINARY PLAT RON HARVIEUX ffAftVfEUX ADDITION 6605 Horseshoe Curve ' u isss'=an° Chanhassen, Minnesota CITY OF WNSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PC Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax 952,227 1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park 8 Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning A Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn us 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Generous, Senior Planner FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal DATE: August 10, 2005 SUBJ: Request for subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1 Sathre Addition, 6605 Horseshoe Curve into two lots with variances, Applicant Ronald Harvieux. Planning Case: 05-26 I have reviewed the request for the above subdivision. In order to comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division, I have the following fire code or city ordinance/policy requirements. The plan review is based on the available information submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are submitted, the appropriate code or policy items will be addressed. No burning permits will be issued. Trees must either be chipped or removed from site. 2. Builder/Developer must comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #29- 1991 regarding premise identification. Copy enclosed. gAsafetyxxnl\plrev05-26 The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails. and beaulitul parks. A gnat place to live, work and play 0 0 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 7700 MARKET BLVD. PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952)227-1150 FAX: (952) 227-1190 Numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. Size and location of numbers shall be approved by one of the following — Fire_ Marshal, Fire Inspector, Building Official, Building Inspector. Requirements are for new construction and existing buildings where no address numbers are posted. 1. Numbers shall be a contrasting color from the background. 2. Numbers shall not be in script. 3. If a structure is not visible from the street, additional numbers are required at the driveway entrance. Size and location must be approved. 4. Numbers on mail box at driveway entrance may be a minimum of 4". However, requirement #3 must still be met. 5. Administrative authority may require additional numbers if deemed necessary. 1. Minimum height shall be 5 inches. 2. Building permits will not be finaled unless numbers are posted and approved by the Building Department. Premises Identification 29-1991 Page 1 of 2 1. Minimum height shall be 12". 2. Multi -Tenant Buildings a. Building address range, minimum height of 12 inches. b. Address numbers required on all tenant doors. Minimum height of 6 inches. 3. If address numbers are located on a directory entry sign, additional numbers will be required on the buildings main entrance. a. Signage on overhead/ delivery doors will also be required. Revisions 6/10/02 3/22/05 Premises Identification 29-1991 Page 2 of 2 Finance The existing site drainage is encompassed within two different drainage areas. Phone: 952.227.1140 MEMORANDUM C OF the area with an existing house. The plans propose to grade about 9% to create CI1H11DNk1SEN TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner 7700 Markel Boulevard FROM: Mak Sweidan, Engineerh�, PC Box 147 _ Chanhassen, MN 55317 lM , 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.2271400 DATE: September 20, 2005 Administration comer. Phone: 952.227.1100 SUBJ: Final Plat Review of Harvieux Addition Fax: 952,227 1110 Land Use Review File No. 05-09 Building Inspections applicant should be aware that any retaining wall over 4' in height must be Phone. 952.227.1180 designed by a structural engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, it Fax 952.2271190 Upon review of the plans submitted by Demazs-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc. Engineering dated September 12, 2005, I offer the following comments and recommendations: Phone: 952 227,1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL Finance The existing site drainage is encompassed within two different drainage areas. Phone: 952.227.1140 The existing site is heavily wooded with tree cover over approximately 80% of Fax: 952.227.1110 the area with an existing house. The plans propose to grade about 9% to create Park a Recreation two new house pads and a proposed private driveway access off of Horseshoe Phone: 952.227.1120 Curve for Lot 1 and off Pleasant View Drive for Lot 2. The proposed grading Fax: 952.227.1110 will prepare the site for full walk -out house pads. Drainage swales have been Recreation Center proposed along the sides of the houses to maintain the neighborhood drainage 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.2271400 pattern through the property. Fax: 952.227.1404 comer. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, shall be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. A 75 -foot minimum rock construction entrance must be added to the entrance that will be accessed during construction. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. *CNN" The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. The existing site drainage is encompassed within two different drainage areas. Planning a Natural Resources The site drains off site to the southeast and southwest directions toward Lotus Phone: 952.227.1130 Lake. The applicant is utilizing the existing grade contour and is not proposing Fax:952.2271110 any storm sewer system. Overall, staff is fine with the proposed grading but has Public Works some concerns on the grades along the east side of the parcel that may affect the 1591 Park Road existing house on the east side of the parcel; as such, staff would recommend Phone: 952.227.1300 installing gutters on the house on Lot 2 and discharge stormwater to the southwest Fax: 9552.227.1310 comer. Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 The plan proposes retaining walls for the driveway access on Lots 1 and 2. The Fax:952.227.1110 applicant should be aware that any retaining wall over 4' in height must be Web site designed by a structural engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, it wwwci.chanhassen.mn.us will require a building permit from the Building Department. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, shall be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. A 75 -foot minimum rock construction entrance must be added to the entrance that will be accessed during construction. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. *CNN" The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A gnat place to live, work, and play. Bob Generous• September 20, 2005 Page 2 UTILITIES No public utility improvements are proposed. The applicant is proposing to extend the water and sanitary sewer services from the City's sewer and watermain off Pleasant View Road for Lot 2 and off Horseshoe Curve for Lot 1. The developer must submit a security to ensure that the street cuts are properly restored to City standards. According to the City's Finance Department records, the parcel was previously assessed for one sanitary sewer and water hookup. However, the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will still be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. STREETS The plan does not show any public street improvement. The plan proposes accessing the lots via a private driveway access from the northeast comer of the parcel off Pleasant View Road and Horseshoe Curve. Staff recommends relocating the Lot 2 driveway access to the south along Lot 1's north property line to create more separation from the northern parcel's existing access. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Relocate Lot 1 sanitary sewer and water services from the northwest off / Pleasant View Road to the west off Horseshoe Curve. 2. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained including but not limited to the MPCA and the Watershed District. 4. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. i 5. Add a note to the plan: All sanitary services must be 6" PVC-SDR26 and water service 1" copper. 6. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 7. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges are applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Bob Generous September 20, 2005 Page 3 8. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 9. Gutters must be installed on the house on Lot 2 and must discharge to the southwest corner of the lot. 10. Submit a security to ensure that the street cuts are properly restored to City standards. 11. The applicant should be aware that any retaining wall height more than 4' in height must be designed by a structural engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, it will require a building permit through the City's Building Department. 12. Cleanouts required at all bends of the sanitary sewer service or every 90 feet, whichever is less. c: Paul Oehme, City Engineer/Public Works Director Alyson Morris, Assistant City Engineer &_ eng\projecisAwvic" additimApr.do Message 0 Generous, Bob From: Roger Knutson [RKnutson@ck-law.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 9:38 AM To: Generous, Bob Subject: RE: Harvieux Subdivision - CC 9/26 I agree. -----Original Message ----- From: Generous, Bob [mailto:bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 8:33 AM To: Roger Knutson Subject: FW: Harvieux Subdivision - CC 9/26 Roger: Before I respond to Debbie, I wanted to run this by you. Page 1 of 2 • My response would be that the existing driveway which serves the existing house and the neighboring house, which meets the definition of a private street, is not created by the subdivision, so no variance is necessary for the existing condition. It is the configuration of the lots with access via a neck that requires the variance. O -----Original Message ----- From: Dick Lloyd [mailto:dlloyd@chestnutpartners.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 9:41 PM To: Gerhardt, Todd; kaaneneson@ci.chanhassen.mn.com; Generous, Bob Cc: City Council Subject: Harvieux Subdivision - CC 9/26 Good evening, Tonight I attended the Planning Commission meeting and I realized that a key point I intended to make about the subject subdivision may have been missed. The subdivision includes a variance for each of the two flag lots - Lot 2 and Lot 3. The existing home on Lot 3 and another home adjacent to Lot 3 (but not within the subdivision) is served by an existing "shared driveway". Code does not permit a driveway within a flag lot to serve two homes. Therefore a variance for a private street to serve the existing homes should be granted and be created as code provides. A variance for a flag lot (LOT 3) should not be granted. 30' width is required for a flag lot or a private street. The width of the common portion of the driveway must be 20' (safety issue) when serving two homes. When a subdivision is created it must comply with existing code. Best Regards, Debbie Lloyd {CANNED 9/7/2005 0 Generous, Bob From: Haak, Lori Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 3:36 PM To: Generous, Bob Subject: RE: Harvieux Addition 0 Yes, we do include it in the SW MP fees if the property has not been charged connection charges in the past. The fees are connection charges that help cover the costs of storm water infrastructure in the development and downstream. The storm water utility is designed to cover maintenance costs for the entire system. Let me know if you have questions. -----Original Message ----- From: Generous, Bob Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 3:20 PM To: Haak, Lori Subject: Harvieux Addition Lori: Ron Harvieux asked me if the SW MP fees should only apply against the two new lots, since the existing home has been paying in to the storm water utility since it began. I could not answer his question, but said I would ask prior to tonight's meeting. Do we include the existing house lot in the area when calculating SW MP fees? Why or why not? Bob « File: Generous, Bob(bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us).vcf >> SCANNED z a a 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PC D4W: September 6, 2005 5 CC DATE: September 26, 2005 REVIEW DEADLINE: September 27, 2005 CASE #: 05-26 BY: RG, LH, ML, AM, JS, ST PROPOSAL: Request for Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition (6605 Horseshoe Curve) into 3 lots with Variances for flag lots. LOCATION: 6605 Horseshoe Curve APPLICANT: Ron Harvieux o 6605 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, MN 55317 PRESENT ZONING: Single -Family Residential District, RSF 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential — Low Density ACREAGE: 1.99 acres DENSITY: Gross/Net: 1.51 units/acre SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting subdivision approval to create three lots with variances for two of the lots to be flag lots. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Subdivision Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Harvieux Subdivision • Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 2 of 10 PROPOSAUSUNMARY The property owners are proposing the subdivision of their lot into three lots, adding two lots north of the existing home. The existing house (Lot 3) will be accessed via the existing shared driveway with the property to the west through a short neck that connects to the public street. Lot 1 has full frontage on Horseshoe Curve. Lot 2 is accessed via an approximately 40 -foot neck area. The property owner proposed this wider area to permit a driveway to meander along its length, preserving three 34 -inch oaks. Staff is recommending that the driveway location for this lot be moved as far south at the street as possible, while still preserving the significant oaks. The northern portion of the property is densely wooded. Lots 1 and 2 will be custom graded at the time of building the individual homes. Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal, and erosion control plans will be required for each of the lots at the time of building permit application. North and east of the site are single-family homes within the Sathre Addition. To the south is Lotus Lake. West of the site is a single-family home within Pleasant View Addition, Horseshoe Curve and a portion of Pleasant View Road. The site slopes from a high point of 958 in the north central portion of the site westerly to an elevation of 948 at the intersection of Pleasant View Road and Horseshoe Curve, easterly to an elevation of 932 at the property line, and southerly to a low of 898 near the lake. Lotus Lake has an ordinary high water elevation of 896.3. Sewer and water are available to the property. Access shall be via Horseshoe Curve. At one time, the entire parcel had frontage on dedicated street right-of-way (Horseshoe Curve and Balder Avenue). However, over time, this right-of-way has been vacated and the property owner was advised that they would not need it for street frontage purposes as part of a subdivision of the property because the ordinance at that time permitted up to four homes to access via a private street Currently, the City Code requires variance approval for the use of private streets and flag lots. Staff is recommending approval of the development subject to the conditions of approval. F. x to: d —IJ L_�—_ w—RFN �'n PFP.YNMARY P r nIRYq,p NOS FaneNn Nne n.Rneux •Fnnrox individual homes. Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal, and erosion control plans will be required for each of the lots at the time of building permit application. North and east of the site are single-family homes within the Sathre Addition. To the south is Lotus Lake. West of the site is a single-family home within Pleasant View Addition, Horseshoe Curve and a portion of Pleasant View Road. The site slopes from a high point of 958 in the north central portion of the site westerly to an elevation of 948 at the intersection of Pleasant View Road and Horseshoe Curve, easterly to an elevation of 932 at the property line, and southerly to a low of 898 near the lake. Lotus Lake has an ordinary high water elevation of 896.3. Sewer and water are available to the property. Access shall be via Horseshoe Curve. At one time, the entire parcel had frontage on dedicated street right-of-way (Horseshoe Curve and Balder Avenue). However, over time, this right-of-way has been vacated and the property owner was advised that they would not need it for street frontage purposes as part of a subdivision of the property because the ordinance at that time permitted up to four homes to access via a private street Currently, the City Code requires variance approval for the use of private streets and flag lots. Staff is recommending approval of the development subject to the conditions of approval. Harvieux Subdivision • • Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 3 of 10 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article XII, "RSF" Single -Family Residential District Chapter 20, Article VII, Shoreland Management District BACKGROUND On February 12, 1990, the Chanhassen City Council approved a partial vacation of unimproved Balder Avenue located to the west of the site (Vacation #90-1). On July 23, 1990, the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat for Sathre Addition creating three lots. This parcel was incorporated in that plat because Mr. Sathre had a 15 -foot wide strip of land that separated this parcel from the public street (Subdivision #89-20). On September 19,1991, the Chanhassen City Council granted a 17 -foot variance from the 75 -foot shoreland setback for the purpose of constructing a deck (Variance #91-09). On July 27, 1992, the Chanhassen City Council approved resolution #92-84 vacating a portion of Hillside Avenue, Horseshoe Curve and Balder Avenue right-of-way adjacent to the parcel (Vacation #92-05). The staff report at the time read, in part, as follows: "In 1990, when the applicants first applied for the vacation of Balder Avenue, staff recommended that the northerly portion of the road remain as public right -0f --way. The reason for this was should Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre's Addition be subdivided, it would have adequate street frontage as the zoning ordinance requires 90 feet of street frontage per single family lot. However, since that time, the City adopted an ordinance allowing up to four parcels to be served by a private driveway. This eliminates the need of retaining the public street frontage on Balder Avenue as the existing driveway serving Lot 2, Block 1 could be utilized to service any newly created parcels." STREETS/ACCESS The plan does not show any public street improvement, it proposes accessing the lots via a private driveway access from the northeast corner of the parcel off Pleasant View Road and Horseshoe Curve. Staff recommends relocating Lot 2 driveway access to the south along Lot 1 north property line, to create more separation from the northern parcel existing access. In order to permit flag lots, the City must find that the following conditions exist (section 18-57 (q) of the Chanhassen City Code): a. The prevailing development pattern makes it unfeasible or inappropriate to construct a public/private street. In making this determination, the City may consider the location of existing property lines and homes, local or geographic conditions and the existence of wetlands. Extension of a public/private street to the two new homes would significantly impact the densely wooded area on the property. Harvieux Subdivision • • Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 4 of 10 b. After reviewing the surrounding area, it is concluded that an extension of the public or a private street system is not required to serve other parcels in the area, improve access, or to provide a street system consistent with the comprehensive plan. Public streets are not necessary to access the property to the east, which is currently developed with single- family homes and accessed via Pleasant View Road. c. The use of the flag lot will permit enhanced protection of the City's natural resources including wetlands and forested areas. The flag lot permits the driveway to meander preserving three significant oaks. LANDSCAPING/TREE PRESERVATION Tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations for the subdivision are as follows: Total upland area (including outlots) 86,491 SF or 1.98 ac. Baseline canopy coverage 75% (65533 SF) Minimum canopy coverage allowed 46% or 39,785 SF Proposed tree preservation 59% or 51,133 SF Developer meets minimum canopy coverage allowed. A minimum of one tree is required in the front yard setback area of each lot. Only trees shown on the preliminary plat as being removed shall be allowed. Any other trees removed shall be replaced at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. Bufferyard plantings are required along Pleasant View Road on Lot 2. The length is forty feet and it is necessary to locate the driveway within this area. The applicant is proposing to save a 34" oak in this area and the house for this lot will be set back over 160 feet. No further bufferyard plantings are required along Pleasant View Road on Lot 2. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN This site is wholly within the neighborhood park service area of North Lotus Lake Park. This park offers a wide variety of amenities including tennis courts, ball fields, a children's playground, picnic shelter, lighted hockey and open skating rinks, open space and a walking trail. Residents of Harvieux Addition will access the park via Pleasant View Road. It should be noted that sidewalks are not available. No additional parkland dedication is required in this area of the City; therefore, park dedication dollars will be required in lieu of land dedication for the two new lots (2 lots X $4,000 per lot = $8,000). COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN No sidewalks or trails are currently available along Pleasant View Road. It is unlikely that these amenities will be constructed in the future even though a pedestrian route along Pleasant View Road is identified in the Comprehensive Plan. No additional trail construction is being recommended as a condition of this development. Harvieux Subdivision • • Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 5 of 10 GRADING/DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL The existing site is heavily wooded with tree cover over approximately 80% of area with an existing house. The plans propose to grade about 9% to create two new house pads and a proposed private driveway access of Horseshoe Curve for Lot 1 and off Pleasant View Road for Lot 2. The proposed grading will prepare the site for full walkout house pads. Drainage swales have been proposed along the sides of the houses to maintain the neighborhood drainage pattern through the property. The existing site drainage is encompassed within two different drainage areas. The site drains off site to the southeast and southwest directions toward Lotus Lake. The applicant is utilizing the existing grade contour and is not proposing any storm sewer system. Over all, staff is fine with the proposed grading but has some concerns on the grades along the east side of the parcel that may affect the existing house on the east of the parcel. As such, staff would recommend the installation of gutters on the house on Lot 2 discharging drainage to the southwest corner. The plan proposes retaining walls for the driveway access on Lots 1 and 2. The applicant should be aware that any retaining wall over 4 feet in height must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, it will require a building permit from the Building Department. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, shall be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. Erosion Control Erosion control blanket should be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas should have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tyce of Sloe Time (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area Steeper than 3:1 7 days is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days Silt fencing should be installed as detailed on the proposed plan. The existing erosion control fence drawing should be replaced with City of Chanhassen Detail Plate 5300. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets should include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. Harvieux Subdivision • • Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 6 of 10 Shoreland Management District The proposed subdivision is within 1,000 feet of the Lotus Lake OHW of 896.3. Within the Shoreland Management district, the impervious surface coverage cannot exceed 25 percent. Currently, Lot 2 shows impervious surface coverage at 24.5 percent. This allows only an additional 117.75 square feet of additional impervious surface on Lot 2 before the 25 percent impervious coverage limit is reached. The installation of additional hard surfaces may cause Lot 2 to exceed the impervious coverage limit. Any hard surfaces (e.g., retaining walls, patios, decks, sidewalks) that may be needed should be illustrated on the proposed subdivision plan to ensure maximum impervious coverage is not exceeded. The plans should show the ordinary high water level (OHW) of Lotus Lake (896.3) and the required 75 -foot setback. Surface Water Management Fees Water Quality Fees Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for this proposed development are based on single-family residential development rates of $1,093/acre. Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 1.99 acres, the water quality fees associated with this project are $2,175. Water Quantity Fees The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average cit - wide rate for the installation of water quantity systems. This cost includes land acquisition, proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage. Single- family residential developments have a connection charge of $2,705 per developable acre. This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $5,383 for the proposed development. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $7,558. UTILITIES No public utility improvement is proposed as the applicant is proposing to extend the water and sanitary services from City sewer and watermain off Pleasant View Road for Lot 2 and off Horseshoe Curve for Lot 1. The developer must submit a security to ensure that the street cuts are properly restored to City standards. According to the City's Finance Department records, the parcel was previously assessed for one sanitary sewer and water hookup. However, the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will still be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. Harvieux Subdivision • • Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 7 of 10 EASEMENTS Standard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated over the front, side and rear yards within the subdivision. A cross -access and maintenance agreement shall be recorded over Lot 3 for the benefit of Lot 46, Pleasant View Addition for the existing driveway. COMPLIANCE TABLE The front lot lines for Lots 2 and 3 are the westerly lot lines. Lot width on neck or flag lots and lots accessed by private streets shall be 100 feet as measured at the front building setback line. Neck/flag lots must, by definition, be a minimum of 30 feet wide. The applicant shall revise the plat to incorporate a 30 -foot neck for Lot 3. This will result in the reconfiguration of Lot 1 and possibly Lot 2 as well in order to maintain the minimum required lot areas. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary Plat for Harvieux Addition with a variance for the use of flag lots, plans prepared by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc., dated 8/04/05, based on the findings of fact attached to this report and subject to the following conditions: 1. Only trees shown on the preliminary plat as being removed shall be allowed. No trees are to be removed on Lot 1. Four trees are allowed to be removed on Lot 2. Any other trees removed shall be replaced at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. 2. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the grading/clearing limits prior to any construction activities and shall remain in place until construction is complete. Area (square Frontage Depth (feet) Setbacks: Net Lot Area feet) (feet) front, side, excluding rear, lake neck (square (feet) feet) Code 15,000; 90; 100 for 125 30, 10, 30, 75 20,000 lake flag lot lot Lot 1 1 15,152 97.5 138 30, 10, 30, na NA Lot 2 123,975 155 (flag) 149 30, 10, 30, na 18,442 sq. ft. Lot 347,364 285 (flag) 1 234 30, 10, 30, 75 146,441sq.ft. Total 186,491 The front lot lines for Lots 2 and 3 are the westerly lot lines. Lot width on neck or flag lots and lots accessed by private streets shall be 100 feet as measured at the front building setback line. Neck/flag lots must, by definition, be a minimum of 30 feet wide. The applicant shall revise the plat to incorporate a 30 -foot neck for Lot 3. This will result in the reconfiguration of Lot 1 and possibly Lot 2 as well in order to maintain the minimum required lot areas. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary Plat for Harvieux Addition with a variance for the use of flag lots, plans prepared by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc., dated 8/04/05, based on the findings of fact attached to this report and subject to the following conditions: 1. Only trees shown on the preliminary plat as being removed shall be allowed. No trees are to be removed on Lot 1. Four trees are allowed to be removed on Lot 2. Any other trees removed shall be replaced at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. 2. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the grading/clearing limits prior to any construction activities and shall remain in place until construction is complete. Harvieux Subdivision • • Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 8 of 10 3. Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal, and erosion control plans will be required for Lots 1 and 2 at the time of building permit application. 4. The front lot lines for Lots 2 and 3 are the westerly lot lines. 5. Neck/flag lots must, by definition, be a minimum of 30 feet wide. The applicant shall revise the plat to incorporate a 30 -foot neck for Lot 3. 6. If grading will be done, a final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 7. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. 8. Addresses for each home must be posted on Horseshoe Curve and on each home. 9. No burning permits will be issued. Trees must either be chipped or removed from site. 10. Builder/Developer must comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #29-1991 regarding premise identification. 11. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slone Time (Maximum time an area can remain open Steeper than 3:1 7 days when the area is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days 12. The existing erosion control fence drawing shall be replaced with City of Chanhassen detail plate 5300. 13. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed 14. Any hard surfaces (e.g., retaining walls, patios, decks, sidewalks) that may be needed shall be illustrated on the proposed subdivision plan to ensure maximum impervious coverage is not exceeded. 15. The plans shall show the ordinary high water level (OHW) of Lotus Lake (896.3) and the required 75 -foot setback. 16. The applicant shall pay the total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording. At this time, the estimated fee is $7,558. 17. The developer shall pay full park fees for the two new lots at the time of final plat recording. Harvieux Subdivision • Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 9 of 10 18. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, MN Department of Health, MCES, and Watershed District. 19. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. 20. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. 21. Extend the silt fence to the north along the west side. 22. Add a note to the plan: All sanitary services must be 6 -inch PVC-SDR26 and water service f- inch copper. 23. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 24. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges are applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. 25. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 26. Add the following City detail plates to the plans: 2001, 5200, 5300 and 5301. 27. Gutters must be installed on the house on Lot 2 and must discharge to the southwest corner. 28. Submit a security to ensure that the street cuts are properly restored to City standards. 29. The applicant should be aware that any retaining wall more than 4 feet in height must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, it will require a building permit through the City's Building Department. 30. Maximum side slope is 3:1, adjust 956' contour north of proposed house on Lot 2 accordingly. 31. Cleanouts are required at all bends of the sanitary sewer service or every 90 feet, whichever is less. 32. Relocate Lot 2 driveway access to the south along Lot 1 northerly property line. 33. Standard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated over the front, side and rear yards within the subdivision. 34. A cross -access and maintenance agreement shall be recorded over Lot 3 for the benefit of Lot 46, Pleasant View Addition, for the existing driveway. Harvieux Subdivision • Planning Case No. 05-26 September 6, 2005 Page 10 of 10 ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Development Review Application 3. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing 4. Rationale for Subdivision — Harvieux Addition 5. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat 6. Memo to Robert Generous from Mark Uttfin dated 8/10/05 gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-26 harvieux subdivision\staff report harvieux.doc 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Pads & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952 227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site wwwei.chanhassen.mn.us • MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner FROM: Mak Sweidan, Engineer DATE: August 30, 2005 C, SUBJ: Preliminary Plat Review of Harvieux Addition Land Use Review File No. 05-09 Upon review of the plans submitted by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc. dated August 4, 2005, I offer the following comments and recommendations: GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL The existing site is heavily wooded with tree cover over approximately 80% of the area with an existing house. The plans propose to grade about 9% to create two new house pads and a proposed private driveway access off of Horseshoe Curve for Lot 1 and of Pleasant View Drive for Lot 2. The proposed grading will prepare the site for full walk -out house pads. Drainage swales have been proposed along the sides of the houses to maintain the neighborhood drainage pattern through the property. The existing site drainage is encompassed within two different drainage areas. The site drains off site to the southeast and southwest directions toward Lotus Lake. The applicant is utilizing the existing grade contour and is not proposing any storm sewer system. Overall, staff is fine with the proposed grading but staff has some concerns on the grades along the east side of the parcel that may affect the existing house on the east side of the parcel; as such, staff would recommend to install gutters on the house on Lot 2 and discharge it to the southwest comer. The plan proposes retaining walls for the driveway access on Lots 1 and 2. The applicant should be aware that any retaining wall over 4' in height must be designed by a structural engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, it will require a building permit from the Building Department. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, shall be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. A 75 -foot minimum rock construction entrance must be added to the entrance that will be accessed during construction. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. WAMM The City of Chanhassen 9 A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. 0 0 Bob Generous August 30, 2005 Page 2 UTILITIES No public utility improvements are proposed. The applicant is proposing to extend the water and sanitary services from City's sewer and watermain off Pleasant View Road for Lot 2 and off Horseshoe Curve for Lot 1. The developer must submit a security to ensure that the street cuts are properly restored to City standards. According to the City's Finance Department records, the parcel was previously assessed for one sanitary sewer and water hookup. However, the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will still be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. STREETS The plan does not show any public street improvement. The plan proposes accessing the lots via a private driveway access from the northeast corner of the parcel off Pleasant View Road and Horseshoe Curve. Staff recommends relocating the Lot 2 driveway access to the south along Lot 1's north property line to create more separation from the northern parcel's existing access. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Revise the grades to show a swale along the east side of Lots 2 and 3. 2. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained including but not limited to the MPCA, MN Department of Health, MCES, and Watershed District. 3. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. 4. Show a minimum 75 -foot rock construction entrance. 5. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. 6. Extend the silt fence to the north along the west side. Add a note to the plan: All sanitary services must be 6" PVC-SDR26 and water service 1" copper. 0 Bob Generous August 30, 2005 Page 3 8. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 9. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges are applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. 10. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 11. Add the following City detail plates to the plans: 2001, 5200, 5300 and 5301. 12. Gutters must be installed on the house on Lot 2 and must discharge to the southwest corner of the lot. 13. Submit a security to ensure that the street cuts are properly restored to City standards. 14. The applicant should be aware that any retaining wall height more than 4' in height must be designed by a structural engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, it will require a building permit through the City's Building Department. 15. Maximum side slope is 3:1. Adjust the 956' contour north of the proposed house on Lot 2 accordingly. 16. Cleanouts required at all bends of the sanitary sewer service or every 90 feet, whichever is less. 17. Relocate Lot 2 driveway access to the south along Lot 1 northern property line. c: Paul Oehme, City Engineer/Public Works Director Alyson Morris, Assistant City Engineer gAeng\projmts\ha ieux additinflpprl Am Date: August 9, 2005 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies 0 From: Planning Department By: Robert Generous, Senior Planner Subject: Request for Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition (6605 Horseshoe Curve) into 3 lots with Variances — Applicant: Ronald Harvieux Planning Case: 05-26 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on August 5, 2005. The 60 -day review period ends September 27, 2005. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on September 6, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than August 26, 2005. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint/United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco SCANNED Location Map Harvieux Subdivision Planning Case No. 05-26 6605 Horseshoe Curve City of Chanhassen d e7 oxo° leasard View Road Pleasant View oV� O� m m 4 � o� °/low Drrve ou Irs o+ HOil o� ma m P o Pm 2 0 10 ox ms � m d m m a y ray o+ ° ° m Subject Site Lotus Lake n m 2e r) I Ih'II I'AT •I hrWIVIN CAt IAAA IIONS PRUPERfY DESCRIPTION �X rv, LUT 1 ANL: 1 AREA . 39,92I SO, fl. Tot 1. Block 1, SATHRE ADDITION / DENOTES IRLE IL` UC RLMOVLP IIA91-181/. CANOPY COVER ARCA = J5,318 50. FT. AND NON -CANOPY COVER AREA = 1,750 50. FT' e Mat port of Horseshoe Curve, originally dedicated in the TREE 5 TO RE REMOVE!) CANOPY ARTA TO RE REMOVED = 3,600 50. FT. record plot o/ SATHREHorseshoe ADDITION and now to bvacated t� 7 11-I4" CTIA (ANOPr APLA In WMAIN - J1,718 50. FT. (00% Of .SITE) which Ips easterly of o line described as Toll 'l• /� / /2-11• ELM tor J AREA = 46,570 50. FT. rim Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, / DA:f IIIJF CANOPY MVC It AREA - .70.8 LS 50. FT rl1- 14" VA,. 8 sai112 et. along gtheADDITION; thence southerly. said n t 2, to e NUN-CANVPY' COVET? AIrLA Ib,40Y 5O. /I. / CANOPY AREA TO BE REMOVED - 0 50. FT. 84.81 f b along the westerly line of escr Lot 2, n the pant of beginning of the line to be sold wiitle, !hence CANOPY AREA 10 HI MAIN = J0,215 50. FT. (IpOX OF SITE) southerly, langent to the curve on sold weaferly line, o distance of 53.28 leek thence southerly on a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius.C v 150.01 1 un.nv" 1 r�'I curve et, to the west the we said having a Curve. I 1 AREAS Site - 86,491 Square Feet/1.99 Acres / 1 V 1 nl 1 - 15,167 Snunre Fent Lot 2 - 18.975 Square Feet (groes area) V h / \ \ Lot 2 - 18,112 Square Feet (nal area) I" A• Lot J - 47,361 Square Feel / \ / . 4Ay 8 *� \ \ \ 1 1 I I /q I 1 he / o so, 'T\�'�, \��L A`• °rD R40 � \ 1 , 11 1 I I I / 1/ E �o rers/1o4\4y,Ar q a•lp��',(°gc \ I 11 I 1//// / / �FC \ \ � �6\0\ 4 oa \ ` \ ` r0 ro• on. '� •c — \ \x L... rm \ (b 1 I l I/ �) l / l IT J o DENOTES POSSIDLF I 11 1, j 1 / BUILDING CONFIGURATION a. I I / o• Iwph 1 \ ' I + \ Ia _�� \ aFPs/a.ad Iry I e 1 I I ?I moAl� / / 2 a 1 � 1 k �I 1 \\\ \\� sq h \. � °� .7/ / � I!•[°/ Ir / / INI 1 1 co,w. \ /' A I 1 /�, �I k\ \ I 7 �� ` m / 'wp 4 � 4/ Iia• la/�/Pou1� 1 I / y Iqil�\ \�\ \ / � �7 j i I -A // 3 ql�� `j� :� = t—\J $2 7� a o �7 L• / 5� 1 /9 I 8A� Ids\, .\ EaOSrariEiPN Lei - A.I. ^e Ix• MI. I I / .l I.]a' Non —" / sM1ed v / I 1 GAAkre / / HOUSE./� I ORnPOSED HARDCn1rre Hardcover Lot I House/Car 2560 Sq.Ft. Drive we Sart. Total Hardcover 3368 Sq.Ff. Lot Area 15152 Sq.Ft. X of Hardcover w 22,2X 'Pod' Area . 3660 Sq.Ft. Hardcover Lot 2 (Net Area) House/Gor 2810 Sq.Ff. Drive 1566 SgE Total Hardcover 4376 Sq.ft Net Area 18442 S9 -Ft. X of Hardcover . 23.7% 'Pad' Area - 8960 Sq.Ft. Hardcover Lot 2 (Gross Area) Haus./Gar 2810 Sq.FI. Drive J056 Sign Total Halle.., 5876 Sg.Ff. Net Area 23975 Sq.f 1. X of Hardcover . 24.5X Existing Hardcover Lot 3 House/Gar 2800 Sq.rL Drive 4621 Sa.Ft. Total Hardeover 7411 Sq.Ft. Lot Area 47364 Sq.Ft. X of Hardcover w, 15.7X EROSION CONTROL M'inow sAAxso` n1A nave, .wro A• an .. or mos rDAW pxr as wap V t -� Room [anaol. DEMARS—GARRIEL 1 hemby Certily Ihol Mb .0 ey, pbn or reso was prepared h m. a under my it I . 'ion.and I�ythat I am o duN Replslered Land LAND SURVEYORSr INC. 5nY°M, Orifi« the a In. ` .f an... Iis 3030 Harbor Lane No. Pfymouth, MN — .. David E. Crook Phone: 763 559-0908 Fax: 768 559-0479 Data: A-DI_pb -_ _ M IM9. No, 77114 17454 I•-." LONS.OWO PREWMINARY PLAT HARVIEUX ADDITION DRAINAGE AND DUTILITY EASEMENTS 5--j5N— 5 Drainage and Utility eosemenla an shown thus: B.aa 5 lel N eMIA edpaap lel h.e., .1.. elh.rehi adkated. and la NAI In width depsmg dphl-ol-way lln.4 a. 41wwn an the plot NOTE: ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS ARE TO BE VACATED AND REDEDICATED IN RHE FINAL PLAT OF HARMEUX A001RON PREPARED FOR: RON HARVIEUX 6605 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, Minnesota CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED AUG 5 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT SCANN[D t • •I Date: August 9, 2005 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies Rrom: Planning Department 0 By: Robert Generous, Senior Planner Subject: Request for Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition (6605 Horseshoe Curve) into 3 lots with Variances — Applicant: Ronald Harvieux Planning Case: 05-26 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on August 5, 2005. The 60 -day review period ends September 27, 2005. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations conceming the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on September 6, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than August 26, 2005. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District I MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint(United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco SCANNED F General 0 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 7700 MARKET BLVD. PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952)227-1150 FAX: (952) 227-1190 CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICY PREMISES IDENTIFICATION Numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. Size and location of numbers shall be approved by one of the following — Fire Marshal, Fire Inspector, Building Official, Building Inspector. Requirements are for new construction and existing buildings where no address numbers are posted. Other Requirements - General 1. Numbers shall be a contrasting color from the background. 2. Numbers shall not be in script. 3. If a structure is not visible from the street, additional numbers are required at the driveway entrance. Size and location must be approved. 4. Numbers on mail box at driveway entrance may be a minimum of 4". However, requirement #3 must still be met. 5. Administrative authority may require additional numbers if deemed necessary. Residential Requirements (2 or less dwelline unit) 1. Minimum height shall be 5 inches. 2. Building permits will not be finaled unless numbers are posted and approved by the Building Department. Premises Identification 29-1991 Pagel of 2 SCANNED Commercial Requirements 1. Minimum height shall be 12". 0 2. Multi -Tenant Buildings a. Building address range, minimum height of 12 inches. b. Address numbers required on all tenant doors. Minimum height of 6 inches. 3. If address numbers are located on a directory entry sign, additional numbers will be required on the buildings main entrance. a. Signage on overhead/ delivery doors will also be required. Revisions 6/10/02 3/22/05 Premises Identification 29-1991 Page 2 of 2 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Bob Generous, Senior Planner FROM: Steven Torell, Building Official DATE: July 18, 2005 0 SUBJ: Site Plan review for: Metes and Bounds Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition. Harvvieux, 6605 Horseshoe Curve. Planning Case: 05-26 I have reviewed the revised plans for the above development and have the following comments: 1. Final grading plans and soil reports must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 2. Each lot must be provided with a separate sewer and water service. 3. House numbers must be posted at the street and on the homes if the homes are not visible from the street. G/plan2005 planning cases/05-26 Harvieux/building officials comments 9OANNED 0 CM OF ceUSEN Date: July 11, 2005 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies W �v- From: Planning Department By: Robert Generous, Senior Planner Subject: Metes and Bounds Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition into two parcels le Applicant: Ronald Harvieux Planting Case: 05-26 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on July 8, 2005. The 60 -day review period ends September 6, 2005. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations conceming the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the City Council on August 8, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than July 29, 2005. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official E Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint/United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 13. Other - 14. Other - 0 0 CIT90F CBARAASSEN Date: July 11, 2005 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department 0 By: Robert Generous, Senior Planner Subject: Metes and Bounds Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition into two parcels Applicant: Ronald Harvieux Planning Case: 05-26 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on July 8, 2005. The 60 -day review period ends September 6, 2005. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the City Council on August 8, 2005 at 7:00 p.m in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than July 29, 2005. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or SprintfUnited) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacorn 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 13. Other - 14. Other - SCANNED 0 0 Notices & Minutes 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: September 29, 2005 RESOLUTION NO: 2005-85 MOTION BY: Peterson SECONDED BY: Lundquist A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT CREATING HARVIEUX ADDITION, RONALD AND LEANNE HARVIEUX WHEREAS, Ronald and Leanne Harvieux have requested a subdivision of their property into three single family lots of 15,064 square feet, 18,800 square feet and 46,441 square feet with variances for the use of neck lots; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision complies with all requirements of the Chanhassen City Code; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 6, 2005, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance and recommended approval of the subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby approves the final plat for Harvieux Addition (Planning Case #05-23) for the Harvieux property, legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition; and that part of Horseshoe Curve, originally dedicated in the record plat of Sathre Addition and now vacated which lies easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, in said Sathre Addition; thence southerly, a distance of 84.82 feet, along the westerly line of said Lot 2, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southerly, tangent to the curve on said westerly line, a distance of 53.28 feet; thence southerly, on a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 150.04 feet, to the west line of said Horseshoe Curve, creating Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Harvieux Addition as shown on the plans received September 12, 2005, prepared by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. Only trees shown on the preliminary plat as being removed shall be allowed. No trees are to be removed on Lot 1. Four trees are allowed to be removed on Lot 2. Any other trees removed shall be replaced at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. 2. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the gradinglclearing limits prior to any construction activities and shall remain in place until construction is complete. 3. Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal, and erosion control plans will be required for Lots 1 and 2 at the time of building permit application. Development of lot 2 shall incorporate a single -lane construction entrance covered with wood chips, tree protection fencing must line the entrance route and a single storage area shall be designated for all materials. Cement trucks may not be allowed to rinse out on site. 4. The front lot lines for Lots 2 and 3 are the westerly lot lines. $Comm 0 0 5. If grading will be done, a final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 6. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. Relocate Lot 1 sanitary sewer and water services from the northwest off Pleasant View Road to the west off Horseshoe Curve. 7. Addresses for each home must be posted on Horseshoe Curve and on each home. 8. No burning permits will be issued. Trees must either be chipped or removed from site. 9. Builder/Developer must comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #29-1991 regarding premise identification. 10. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can remain open Steeper than 3:1 7 days when the area is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days 11. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed 12. The applicant shall pay the total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording in the amount of $7,558. 13. The developer shall pay full park fees for the two new lots at the time of final plat recording in the amount of $8,000. 14. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA and Watershed District. 15. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. 16. Extend the silt fence to the north along the west side. 17. Add a note to the plan: All sanitary services must be 6 -inch PVC-SDR26 and water service f- inch copper. 18. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 19. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges are applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. E 0 20. All disturbed areas, as a result of construction, must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 21. Gutters must be installed on the house on Lot 2 and must discharge to the southwest corner of the lot. 22. Submit a security to ensure that the street cuts are properly restored to City standards. 23. The applicant should be aware that any retaining wall more than 4 feet in height must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, it will require a building permit through the City's Building Department. 24. Cleanouts are required at all bends of the sanitary sewer service or every 90 feet, whichever is less. 25. A ten foot drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated along the western property line of Lot 3. 26. A cross -access and maintenance agreement shall be recorded over Lot 3 for the benefit of Lot 46, Pleasant View Addition, for the existing -driveway. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 29'" day September of 2005. ATTES AZ1 Todd Gerhardt, City Manager YES NO Furlong Labatt Lundquist Peterson Tjomhom Tom Furlong, Mayor • � os-zco ' City Council Meeting — September 29, 2005 b. Resolution#2005-79: Call Assessment Hearing for TH 312/212 Improvements, Project Numbers 03-09, 04-05, 04-06. C. Resolution#2005-80: Call Assessment Hearing for 2005 MUSA Improvements, Phase I, Project 04-05. e. Approval of Registered Land Surveys for: Resolution#2005-81: Lot 6, Block 1, Christmas Acres, Subdivision #05-02. Resolution#2005-82: 860, 890 and 910 Pleasant View Road, Subdivision #05-09. f. Approval of Amendment to City Code Relating to the Disposal of Unclaimed Property, including Summary Ordinance for Publication Purposes. g. Approval of City Code Amendment to Chapter 6, Article III Concerning Watercraft Operating Regulations. h. Approval of Reassignment of Landscaping Requirements, Highlands at Bluff Creek. Chanhassen West Business Park: 1) Approval of Final Plat. 2) Resolution#2005-82A: Approval of Plans & Specifications and Development Contract. k. Resolution#2005-83: Order Preparation of Feasibility Report for 2006 Street Improvements, Project 06-01. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Rick Dorsey asked that item 1(d) be pulled for discussion. Mayor Furlong stated the item will be discussed after new business. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: Janet Paulsen: Council people. My name is Janet Paulsen and I live at 7305 Laredo Drive. wish to address the subject of the Harvieux subdivision. Mayor Furlong: Mrs. Paulsen, would it be okay if we brought that up during, when we're discussing that? Janet Paulsen: Sure, that'd be fine. Mayor Furlong: That will be fine. I'll make time for public comments. Would anybody else like to address the council during visitor presentations this evening? No? Okay. We offer this every evening so people are welcome to come each meeting. OCANNED 0 0 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 29, 2005 Mayor Furlong called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Councilwoman Tjomhom, Councilman Peterson, Councilman Labatt and Councilman Lundquist STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Justin Miller, Roger Knutson, Bob Generous, Paul Oehme, and Todd Hoffman PUBLIC PRESENT FOR ALL ITEMS: Danny DeHoyos Chad Varner Daniel Knighton Joseph Pittsley Tyler Hokanson Richard, Jeffrey & Robbie Lyman Brendon Harris Micah Baird Debbie Lloyd Janet & Jerry Paulsen Shayne Eyre PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: 921 Bluff Pass South 2438 Hunter Drive 17087 Hanover Lane, Eden Prairie 8218 Hillside Drive, Eden Prairie 2188 Grimm Road, Chaska 2441 Clover Field Drive, Chaska 18654 Vogel Farm Trail, Chaska 9648 Jonathon Lane, Eden Prairie 7302 Laredo Drive 7305 Laredo Drive 1100 Lake Susan Drive Mayor Furlong: Welcome everybody. We appreciate you joining us here this evening and for those watching at home as well. We do have some boy scouts in our gallery this evening from Troop 296 I believe so welcome to them as well. They're working on their citizenship in the community badge. At this time I'd like to ask if there are any modifications or changes to the agenda that was distributed with the packet. If not, without objection we'll proceed with the agenda as distributed. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Peterson moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Approval of Minutes: -City Council Work Session Minutes dated September 12, 2005 -City Council Verbatim & Summary Minutes dated September 12, 2005 Receive Commission Minutes: -Planning Commission Verbatim & Summary Minutes dated September 6, 2005 City Council Meeting — September 29, 2005 • certainly would consider that as well. So any other thoughts or comments based upon what people have heard? If not, is there a motion? Councilman Peterson: I'd move to approve the denial as presented by staff in the staff report. Mayor Furlong: Based on the findings of fact? Roger Knutson: Yes, and adopting the findings of the Planning Commission as your findings. Councilman Peterson: You know I don't say that just so you have something to say during the meeting. Roger Knutson: I'd be really bored if you didn't give me at least a little opportunity tonight. Councilman Peterson: That's fine. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Mayor Furlong: Any further discussion on the motion? Seeing none we'll proceed with the vote. Councilman Peterson moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council denies Variance #05-28 for a request for relief from the city's ordinances in order to place a non -illuminated sign on a bank drive thru canopy without street frontage based on the findings of fact in the staff report and the following: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship to warrant a variance. 2. The applicant has adequate signage. All voted in favor, except Councilman Lundquist and Councilman Labatt who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 3 to 2. HARVIEUX SUBDIVISION. 6605 HORSESHOE CURVE, RONALD HARVIEUX: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE LOT 2, BLOCK 1, SATHRE ADDITION INTO 3 LOTS WITH VARIANCES, PLANNING CASE 05-26. Bob Generous: Thank you Mr. Mayor, council members. As you stated this is a request for preliminary and final plat approval. There is a variance request for the use of flag lots to, as creating two of the lots. The applicant has prepared revisions to the plat to correspond with some of the issues that we had. Specifically this flag lot is required to be 30 feet in width and so they've amended this plan to show that. In doing that they've had to revise lots 1 and 2. They did follow the Planning Commission's recommendation and maintained the existing east/west line between Lots 1 and 2, and instead extending the lot to the south. Again the variances for the 14 SCANNED 0 0 City Council Meeting — September 29, 2005 use of the net part of the flag lot, they each have 30 feet or more of frontage on a public street. The existing home on the south end, there will be no change in how that accesses itself. It shares a driveway with the property to the west. As a condition of approval we're requiring that they provide an easement to maintain that access in place for that. Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary and the resolution for the final plat subject to the conditions in the staff report. With that I'd be happy to answer any questions. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Questions for staff. Just to confirm Mr. Generous with these realignments of the lot lines, all the lots still meet our ordinances, correct? Bob Generous: Yes, they complied with ordinance. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Thank you. Any other questions for staff? If not, is the applicant here this evening? Is there anything you'd like to address to the council? Ron Harvieux: Mr. Mayor and council members. My name is Ron Harvieux. I live at what is Lot 3 in the old subdivision. 6605 Horseshoe Curve. We have lived there, my family and I for 26 years and as I mentioned at the Planning Commission, we think we've been good stewards of the land in the 26 years, and we intend to be, as we develop the proposed subdivision. As Mr. Generous has indicated, we have complied with all the directives of the Planning Commission. We understand them and the compromises were pretty easy to make and we've made them. One of the big issues that Bob mentioned was in realigning these lots to make a 30 foot neck lot, one of the big issues the Planning Commission came up with, and we believe in is maintaining some very large trees that are on the lot. It's a very lovely wooded lot and we made the changes without removing any further trees, which was that whole issue of not moving that north/south line, so that's what that's about. We also changed the placement of the driveway and the neck lot for Lot number 2, which was the Planning Commission's request but also was our neighbor, our near neighbor's request. They would like to see that driveway move as far away from them as possible. They happen to be just over the line, and we're doing that. We understand their needs and we're trying to comply with that. And lastly we added patios and sidewalks to the configuration for Lot number 2, which was getting close to the hard cover number, but we went for the very worst case scenario because we really do understand the concept of the hard cover and we understand what Planning Commission is saying to us, so we added the sidewalk and patio the best we could see at this point to build a worst case scenario which still lives within the guidelines and so we think we've addressed that issue. In fact we agree with everything that's been done with one exception and that is, just a point of clarification. Under the resolution document for final plat, there's a point number 3 which states the last sentence of that point, that we should make sure, I think it's all heavy. Bob, I might have to borrow the document. I left mine back at my chair. Is it on the top, I'm sorry. It reads right now, heavy mixing trucks should use conveyor pipes to transport cement. We are considering building what's called ICF poured concrete home there, which is ICF is Insulated Concrete Forms, but it is a pumping issue, where the concrete's pumped into the home and it's poured concrete from the foundation all the way up to the rafters. And quite honestly I don't know if the state of the art stuff right now that they can actually pump that concrete from the street all the way to where the house site is, so I only ask on point number 3, as point of clarification, that heavy mixing trucks should use conveyor pipes to transport cement as feasible. I simply don't know if they can carry as far as 15 City Council Meeting — September 29, 2005 • from the street all the way to the housing sites. If they can, we'd ask them to do that but we don't know that they can. Thank you sir, so for that one clarification. Beyond that I'm available here to answer any questions that might come up and I thank you for the consideration. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Questions for the applicant. I guess when you say as feasible you're speaking to, that it's physically possible. Ron Harvieux: Yes. Mayor Furlong: Not from a cost standpoint or. Ron Harvieux: Well, well let's see. Yeah, I suppose I have to say affordably. I mean I have no idea what it would take to pump, I don't know this, to pump cement 100 yards. I just don't know if that's reasonably affordably feasible. I should put affordably in there because I don't know. I don't know if that can be done. I think it's a start of the art question but I have no answer to it. Mayor Furlong: Yeah, cost is feasible from a cost standpoint is different things to different people versus state of the art so, Mr. Generous thoughts there or Mr. Knutson, Mr. Gerhardt. Todd Gerhardt: I believe we probably put that condition in there to try to protect the vegetation around the foundation. Ron Harvieux: And there are some other caveats that go to the same thing. Put in a 4 inch layer of chipped mulch. Consider the use of bridging things that go over the root system, and we understand that. We will do that, but the issue of pumping, my issue right now is pumping concrete 100 yards. I just don't know if that can be feasibly done. I just don't know. But we want to protect the trees. Roger Knutson: Mayor? Mayor Furlong: Yeah. Roger Knutson: I'm not sure I'm quite understanding this but are we talking about, when it comes out of the cement truck ... the typical cement truck has a chute. I don't know how long they are but is that what you're talking, using that chute? Ron Harvieux: No sir, they do have booms. Todd Gerhardt: Like a fire hose Roger. Roger Knutson: So maybe what you're saying is a boom that is readily available rather than, maybe you can get something from. Mayor Furlong: The other issue here, I mean depending on the sequence of building versus Lot 1 versus Lot 2, does that give you some other flexibility? I mean what I'm thinking is we might have, we might not have the answer tonight but it might be something that we might have to 16 0 0 City Council Meeting — September 29, 2005 have them work with staff and when the situation comes up, when the grading plans are submitted. Ron Harvieux: That unfortunately, Lot 2, which is the lot that's furthest away from the street is the lot we'd like to develop fust. So I mean in some ways perhaps that's the one that needs the answer first. Again I think probably in the world of pumping concrete, I suppose there's something out there that can pump it 100 yards. I don't know. That's not seems to be in the realm of kind of evidential applications we've seen. It's much less than that. Mayor Furlong: Mr. Gerhardt, thoughts? Todd Gerhardt: Not 100 yards. Roger Knutson: Perhaps maybe what we're getting at, I think I understand. You're saying he must do this if it is feasible and what we're struggling is how do we define feasible. I mean given all the, maybe you want to say if feasible and then let, delegate to the staff that that determination and say, you've got to do it unless you can convince the staff that it's not feasible. And they'll look at it carefully. Mayor Furlong: Then if there's a disagreement with staffs interpretation they can come back here. And that gives the flexibility, depending upon whether you can utilize Lot 1 or not, or other options. Ron Harvieux: I think the staff has been very clear and open and workable to date. I bet they will continue to do that. I'd be very willing to accept that condition. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Mr. Knutson, would you like to work out some language when we get to our motion and Mr. Gerhardt. Roger Knutson: Certainly. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any other questions for the applicant at this point? No? Okay. Very good, thank you. There was a request from Mrs. Paulsen to comment so I would invite her forward at this time, and when she's done, if other members of the public would like to comment, they'd be welcome as well. Janet Paulsen: Again council people. I have three issues with this development. The first one is, refers to the side lot. Lot 3, which is the lot that has the present house on it. That driveway also serves the neighboring lot, and according to our city codes we can't have one driveway serving two homes. Now if you have a flag lot you have a 30 foot space to put in your driveway. That means you also have a 30 foot space to put in a private street. A private street can be used to access two homes but not a driveway. In fact there is no such thing as private driveway in our code. The second issue is Lot 2. I just want to make sure that the table that's given is to be understood then on Lot 2 the lot area is 18,422 square feet. And therefore the impervious surface is one-fourth of that. The area has been corrected but with the lot area cannot include the neck, that's the deal with a flag lot. So I just want to make sure that that's clear to the builder. And 17 0 0 City Council Meeting — September 29, 2005 then again about the private street versus a flag lot driveway. If you create, this is creating a new subdivision and you're creating Lot 3. Then if it has sharing a driveway with another lot you're creating a non -conforming lot which is also against code. Thank you. Mayor Furlong: And I guess Mrs. Paulsen, quick question there. Your first point was about the 30 foot space. Was that a terminology issue between a shared drive or a shared driveway or shared private street or private driveway? Is that terminology because your third point, I guess I didn't understand the difference between those two, so help me understand. Your first point was about the. Janet Paulsen: If you have room for a flag lot you have room for a private street. A private street would be able to access 2 homes because it would have a 30 foot width and a 30 foot length for those 2 homes to have their cars go through, but a flag lot would only have a 10 foot driveway. That's all that's required for it, for 2 people to use it. Is that clear? Mayor Furlong: I think so. Then your third point though was again relating to a shared private street? Janet Paulsen: If you have, if they have a shared driveway, or 2 homes accessed by one driveway, which is against code, you'd be creating a non -conforming lot and you would have to have a variance for that. Mayor Furlong: So is it nomenclature or? Janet Paulsen: No. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Janet Paulsen: It's following code. Mayor Furlong: That's what we try to do. So but I'm just wondering if it was nomenclature that was bothering you or if it was the title or. Janet Paulsen: It's also a safety issue because private street requires a wider pavement. Mayor Furlong: But the current driveway does not meet the requirements for a private street, is that? Janet Paulsen: It's wide enough to put in a private street. If they make it a flag lot. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Good, thank you. Mr. Generous, comments on those points. Bob Generous: Roger and I have had this discussion back and forth. Lot 3 is an existing condition. The subdivision's not creating that private street/private drive issue. It's already there. They're not changing that with the subdivision. Therefore we don't, there's no nexus between the subdivision and making them upgrade that area because that's in place. The new In 0 0 City Council Meeting — September 29, 2005 lots are up on top. Our contention was that the configuration of the lots had to comply with the ordinance requirements, and the 30 feet. That's correct. That would be sufficient to do a private street, and if they further subdivide to the west and added homes accessing off of that, then we would make them upgrade that and get the variance for the private street, but because it's existing condition, they're not changing anything. Except for the lot line in that area. Mayor Furlong: So it's an existing non -conforming and the use of that existing non- conformance is not changing? Bob Generous: Correct. It's not intensifying or anything. Roger Knutson: The courts have looked at this issue and said, you cannot require someone to eliminate an existing non -conformity just because they're subdividing if it's a legal non- conformity. For example if you have an existing building on there that is out of it's setbacks and someone wants to come in and subdivide it but that line isn't changed because of the subdivision, you can't require it to be eliminated as a condition of the subdivision process. It's not being changed. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright. And the_other question was. Bob Generous: The area for the Lot 2, yes we did recognize that the coverage cannot include the neck area of the flag, and also the converse side of that, and which is good for Mr. Harvieux is that we can't count the impervious surface within that either so, he gets to take that out too. Mayor Furlong: So the driveway along that. Bob Generous: Within that 40 foot neck is not included in his impervious surface for the 18,000 square foot lot. The flag if you will. Mayor Furlong: Okay, and did you use the 18,000 foot in the preliminary. Bob Generous: Yes, we did use the total area to calculate it but we also used all the impervious surface within that area too so I think there's more impervious surface in there than any other... properties so he actually gets a bonus. Ron Harvieux: Could I ... for that? Mayor Furlong: Please. Ron Harvieux: Maybe... Mayor Furlong: If you could come to the microphone. Ron Harvieux: Here is the lot without the neck lot. There's the total width of the neck lot so actually we're. 19 City Council Meeting — Sember 29, 2005 • Bob Generous: It's less. Ron Harvieux: It's less and the neck lot is actually by itself, is more than 25% impervious coverage because the driveway meanders. The driveway is 10 feet off the 40 foot lot so the actual street would be 25% but because it meanders it's over 25. And so really we're penalized by including the neck lot. If we take it out, our coverage is less. Bob Generous: It goes from almost 25% to 23% site coverage based on that design. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Okay, thank you. Is there anybody else who would like to comment? Debbie Lloyd: Debbie Lloyd, 7302 Laredo Drive. Just to that last point, I think it would behoove us then to put the accurate information in the report so it doesn't lead to confusion. Whether it be beneficial or detrimental, just to have the right calculations in there. Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Is there anybody else that would like to provide comment at this time? Very good, thank you. Any follow up questions for staff? Or the applicant. If not, I'll bring it back to council for discussion. Comments. Thoughts. Councilman Peterson: I think it's reasonable. I think that to make those changes and clarify so there is no ambiguity is certainly beneficial. Other than that, it seems reasonable. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Councilwoman Tjornhom, thoughts. Councilwoman Tjomhom: I agree with Councilman Peterson. Mayor Furlong: Councilman Lundquist. Councilman Lundquist: I would recommend that we completely remove the last sentence of condition 3. I think we understand the intent there, but I just shudder at the amount of time that Paul and Kate and Bob and our naturalist and everybody else and half of the city are going to try to figure out if we can drive a cement truck on this. Sorry, concrete truck on this lot, and I think we understand Mr. Harvieux and everyone's intent to save as many of those mature trees as possible and understand that he's going to do that and we'll put our trust. I'm willing to put my trust in them to do the right thing and for us to sit here and try to figure out how we're going to pump concrete around this in my mind is ridiculous. So I would suggest let's take it out and not create an administrative pain for ourselves. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Councilman Labatt. Councilman Labatt: I concur with everybody, including Mr. Lundquist's deletion. Mayor Furlong: You're very agreeable this evening. I think so too, and Councilman Lundquist I think it's a very reasonable recommendation and I would support just taking out that last sentence as well. Any other thoughts? Comments. Verygood. I appreciate the work that the applicant and the Planning Commission did to try to recognize that there are some significant 20 0 0 City Council Meeting — September 29, 2005 trees on this lot and if we can, by working with the, how it will be developed to try to minimize any damage to those and impact I think we can do that and I think that's been done here reasonably and I appreciate the applicant's efforts as well as the Planning Commission and staff to try to get that done. Are there any other comments? Thought? Councilman Lundquist: One other mulligan Mr. Mayor to the comments that were made by the public. Would also recommend through a motion that we amend the staff report to have the correct calculations and data with that as well so that the permanent record reflects the correct numbers. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Without objection let's do that. Is there any other comments or suggestions? Councilman Labatt: No. Mayor Furlong: Very good. Is there a motion? Councilman Lundquist: What page is it on? Mayor Furlong: 260. Or actually on the staff report 7 of 10. Councilman Peterson: I'd recommend the City Council approve preliminary plat and final plat, resolution as submitted by the staff report and the surveyor's dated 8/04/05 with conditions I through 34 with condition number 3, the last sentence to be removed, along with, as we discussed earlier, putting the proper information and data and points to make them accurate for the staff report. Mayor Furlong:. Thank you. Is there a second? Councilman Lundquist: Second. Mayor Furlong: Made and seconded. Any discussion on the motion? Hearing none we'll proceed with the vote. Councilman Peterson moved, Councilman Lundquist seconded that the City Council approves the preliminary and Resolution#2005-85 for Harvieux Addition with a variance for the use of flag lots, plans prepared by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc., dated 8/04/05, revised stamped received September 12, 2005, based on the findings of fact attached to this report and subject to the following conditions: Only trees shown on the preliminary plat as being removed shall be allowed. No trees are to be removed on Lot 1. Four trees are allowed to be removed on Lot 2. Any other trees removed shall be replaced at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. 2. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the grading/clearing limits prior to any construction activities and shall remain in place until construction is complete. 21 City Council Meeting — Sep-fember 29, 2005 C, J Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal, and erosion control plans will be required for Lots 1 and 2 at the time of building permit application. Development of Lot 2 shall incorporate a single -lane construction entrance covered with wood chips, tree protection fencing must line the entrance route and a single storage area shall be designated for all materials. Cement trucks may not be allowed to rinse out on site. 4. The front lot lines for Lots 2 and 3 are the westerly lot lines. 5. If grading will be done, a final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 6. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. Relocate Lot I sanitary sewer and water services from the northwest off Pleasant View Road to the west off Horseshoe Curve. Addresses for each home must be posted on Horseshoe Curve and on each home. 8. No burning permits will be issued. Trees must either be chipped or removed from site. 9. Builder/developer must comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #29-1991 regarding premise identification. 10. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) 11. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. 12. The applicant shall pay for the total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording in the amount of $7,558.00. 13. The developer shall pay full park fees for the two new lots at the time of final plat recording in the amount of $8,000. 14. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, and Watershed District. 15. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. 22 City Council Meeting — September 29, 2005 • 16. Extend the silt fence to the north along the west side. 17. Add a note to the plan: All sanitary services must be 6 inch PVC-SDR26 and water service 1 inch copper. 18. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the city with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 19. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges are applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 truck hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. 20. All disturbed areas as a result of construction must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 21. Gutters must be installed on the house on Lot 2 and must discharge to the southwest comer of the lot. 22. Submit a security to ensure that the street cuts are properly restored to city standards. 23. The applicant should be aware that any retaining wall more than 4 feet in height must be designed by a structural engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, it will require a building permit through the City's Building Department. 24. Cleanouts are required at all bends of the sanitary sewer service or every 90 feet, whichever is less. 25. A ten foot drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated along the western property line of Lot 3. 26. A cross access and maintenance agreement shall be recorded over Lot 3 for the benefit of Lot 46, Pleasant View Addition for the existing driveway. 27. Amend the staff report to have the correct calculations and data so the permanent record reflects the correct numbers. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. APPROVAL FOR AN OFFICUWAREHOUSE BUILDING, PLANNING CASE 05-27. Bob Generous: Thank you Mr. Mayor, council members. As you stated this is a request for site plan review. It's the first building within the Chanhassen West Business Park, which is the plat that was approved tonight as part of the consent agenda. This building is approximately 46,000 square feet. The development is off of Galpin Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard. It's the most westerly lot within the development, and I'll just show you. This is the concept plan for the 23 Planning Commission Met — September 6, 2005 • 05-2-(.o McDonald: I'll second. Keefe moved, McDonald seconded that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the attached Registered Land Surveys referred to as Exhibits A and B as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Public Present: Name Address Ron & Leanne Harvieux 6605 Horseshoe Curve Steve Wanek 6615 Horseshoe Curve Don & Darlene Miller 395 Pleasant View Road Maryevelyn Monty 370 Pleasant View Road Joe Pfankuch 6611 Horseshoe Curve Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Sacchet: Thanks Bob. Questions from staff. Jerry. McDonald: I have a question for you. On this, on the driveway that serves the existing home, that is an existing driveway that's currently there, is that true? Generous: That's correct. McDonald: Okay, so it's currently a shared driveway between those two properties. Or the two houses. Generous: The two houses, correct. McDonald: Okay. It is existing and it's there, why are we requiring that now he add width to that if it's already there? Generous: It's not for the driveway per se. It's for the neck portion of the lot. Our ordinance defines a neck as being 30 feet wide. And so that's the only part that we have a problem with. McDonald: Okay. No further questions. Thanks Jerry. Any other questions? Keefe: Yeah. In regards to the neck lots, if they make the changes as you propose them to be made, do we still have a variance? Just to grant a variance for the neck. Generous: To use that configuration for lots who have to grant... 16 WANIMo 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — September 6, 2005 Keefe: Even with the changes. Generous: Yeah, even with the changes. Just to have a flag lot with the neck access. Sacchet: Flag lot in every case. Generous: Yes, requires the variance. Keefe: Okay, and then just in regards to the discussion in regards to the impervious surface coverage on particularly Lot 2. Is the, does the proposed plan right now, is that just the building or does it include hard surface around the building? So the question I have is, are we going to be seeing these guys come back in right after it gets built because they want to put a sidewalk in or they want to put a driveway in or something like that. Or variance for a hard surface coverage because it's within the shoreland district. Generous: Right. What we requested that the applicant do is show us as big a house as they would put in there and what the maximum driveway that they would have, and so they did that and then they used those numbers to calculate what the site coverage was. Is. . Keefe: The site coverage includes the driveway. Generous: Driveway. All the impervious area. It wouldn't show a sidewalk yet because we're not down to that detail, but it does show, you can see the proposed hard cover on the side, what is it, Lot 2 has a 2,810 square foot footprint, which is a pretty big. Keefe: So in the back it slopes back pretty dramatically. Generous: Yeah, it goes down to the east it's pretty steep. Keefe: So likely have a patio going in there probably. Like it'd be more of like a second. Generous: A deck would be able to go onto the east side and then also to the south. Keefe: So in terms of additional hard surface coverage, the likelihood, and we don't know for sure because we don't know the actual plans but it could be that they would add a sidewalk from the driveway to the front entrance. Generous: Right, and they have, if you look at the way that driveway's configured as it comes to the back it widens up so that's usually where we can reduce impervious coverage. Keefe: Okay, because we're right up against the ordinance on that. Generous: Yeah, 24'/2. Keefe: Okay. That's it. 17 01, sO# Planning Commission Meeting — September 6, 2005 • Sacchet: Any other questions? Jerry. McDonald: To follow up on that. Does the owner understand the limitations here? That if we grant this based upon this footprint, this is pretty much what he's got to work with and we won't see someone coming back in asking us to go to 25.4 or something like that? Generous: That was my understanding and I'll have him address that but I requested that he make Lot 2 as big as he could because the 25% impervious issue would come up and that's part of the reason that configuration's like it is. McDonald: Okay, thank you. Keefe: And just one further clarification. With the changes that you've proposed, are we going to be reducing the square footage on Lot 2 or are we going to be increasing it? So in other words are we going to, if they go with the changes that you're proposing in terms of adjusting for the neck lot, are we going to be bumping up against the impervious surface coverage? And maybe I just make that as a no. There's a potential for that... Generous: There's a potential but we would recommend that he keep that square footage you know as it is. There's several ways that he can do it. He can extend the south lot line. Now if he's taking enough. Actually my concern for coverage was on Lot 1 because that's the smallest of all the lots in the development. Sacchet: Okay. I have another question. Additional question Bob. In addition to those two we already addressed. The staff report talks about this mysterious avenue, Balder Avenue. Which one is Balder Avenue? Generous: It was a platted right-of-way on the west side of this parcel. Sacchet: So it's the part that turned into the technically private road. It's the driveway that serves the two. Generous: Yes, part of that and it also is the western, there's actually two parts of it. It was the western edge of this lot and then the eastern edge of the lot. Sacchet: Now I see it. It's actually, it was the whole length of the property there. Generous: Right. Keefe: Is that an access to the lake? Generous: No. It was dedicated as part of the original plat as public right-of-way but it was never used and as the history has shown, it was vacated over time. In pieces. IF] 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — September 6, 2005 Sacchet: Yeah, it looks like it dropped right into the lake. Alright. And so their rationale was because there was this Balder Avenue and at the time that was vacated there was no issue. Generous: Yeah, it wasn't a variance to have either a private street or a flag lot. That came up later. Sacchet: And that kind of begs another question. I mean we're asking the applicant to make that neck area wider potentially you're suggesting it should be 30 foot wide. But it's a shared driveway. Why shouldn't some of the land on the other side, does that belong to the right-of- way? Generous: No, it belongs to the property owner to the west, because that was vacated also and the split was where it's shown. Sacchet: So, but since it's serving both properties, really the right-of-way should be on both properties potentially but then that's out of our control. Generous: Yeah, that's not this property doesn't have control of that. Sacchet: Okay. Generous: They could have, we could grant a variance for the width of that. He has 15 feet that he's showing currently. They could have, we could grant a variance for the width of that. He has 15 feet that he's showing currently. Sacchet: Because logically common sense wise it makes more sense to add land on the other side because there is this curve and there's room between the road and this driveway. You see what I'm saying? Generous: Yes. Sacchet: Okay. Alright. Understand where you're at with that. Any other questions? Jerry, go ahead. McDonald: You brought up an interesting point. How do we do something such as that? Sacchet: Well the thing is we have an applicant and they have to deal with what they own. And that's why I bring this up. I mean it's a sticky thing. If they want to do something on their property they have to accommodate the ordinance on their property. Like in this case it gets kind of hairy because it would make much more sense to have that dedication for that what eventually, in the terms of city context will be a private road because it accesses two lots. I mean this land, that's basically no man's land between the road and the driveway. And would much more make sense, common sense wise to have that be part of the dedication of what is considered the driveway or the private road. But we can't really deal with that because that's outside of what we have to play with right now. 19 Planning Commission Mee — September 6, 2005 • McDonald: And there's no mechanism for us to look at, at least within his property forcing what his share would be in leaving the other... Generous: You could always grant a variance for that neck width if you will. Sacchet: We can't make it conditional, something that's not in front of us you see. Then we imply, it's not really a condition but the implied thought is that then on the other side some of it would be calculated into that. McDonald: Well it's my understanding, we end up punishing him because it was his, he's got the land and the impact could be on Lot 1. I guess I just was wondering if it's something we could explore in terms of if we grant the variance on the neck and how we make sure that he gets put off on the other side. You know I wouldn't want to do one without the other. Sacchet: Yeah and you see that's out of our hands. That would be something the applicant would have to work out ahead of time. Generous: Mr. Chairman, you could only address it if that property owner later came in for a subdivision maybe. Sacchet: Alright. Dan go ahead. Keefe: Just one follow up question. Going back to Lot 2 and just to the east side of that. There is kind of a dotted line and it says erosion control. Is there a proposal to have a retaining wall of any sort on that east side? I mean because you've got about a 20 foot elevation change it looks like from the back of that house going down to the east. And just based on our events of the night before last, a couple of nights ago. Moms: Good point. There is, they do show a retaining wall on the east side. It shows up as 5 small circles on the east edge of the proposed driveway right at the garage, so they do identify the need because of the elevation differences to put a retaining wall in at that location. As far as putting in a retaining wall at the back of the house, they're not identifying it at this point because the builder's intent is to work with the land as much as possible to reduce the impact. Hence the custom graded lots that are shown in front of you tonight. So at this point they know they'll have to have a retaining wall at that location. They're not proposing a retaining wall at another location on Lot 2. On Lot 1, again there's 4 small dots. Audience: Excuse me, is it possible to see the plot while this discussion is going on? Sacchet: Yeah, we can put it up for you, certainly. It's very small so you probably won't see the little dots she's talking about but we can point out where they are. Can you zoom in a little Nann? Moms: At this location here is Lot 2. And the proposed driveway comes in at this location and they're proposing a retaining wall right here at the proposed garage. 20 Planning Commission Meeting — September 6, 2005 • Sacchet: And it's not a very big retaining, at least not a very long retaining wall isn't it? Morris: No. It's shown as probably about 10 feet long. Sacchet: 10-15 feet. Something along that. Moms: Something. Sacchet: Wide, not high. Wide. Moms: Correct, and it's very preliminary because they don't have the house plan but they do show the need that, because of the driveway grades, because of the house, they do show a retaining wall required at that location and then over here on Lot 1, again adjacent to the garage, another retaining wall for Lot 1. Sacchet: Similar situation. Moms: Similar situation. Sacchet: Can you see it at all? Okay. Thanks Alyson. Appreciate it. Keefe: Can you, just as one quick follow up and I don't know, but can you speak just a little bit how the water would flow, the run off would go on that just to the east. Just given that elevation. Sacchet: You're prepared, wow. Moms: I'll answer that. What we looked at, what I looked at here is I wanted to make sure that the property to the east particularly of Lot 2 wouldn't be severely impacted by a proposed lot here, so what I show was existing drainage pattern at this location and proposed drainage pattern at this location, and the different basically there's 3 different drainage areas on the property shown in the respective colors and where this pink drains to the street. The blue drains to the lake. The green drains to the east. So that shows what the drainage patterns are doing currently and what they're proposed, so when I looked at Lot 2, there's not a significant increase in area draining to that existing house to the east. In fact the biggest change from existing to post development drainage patterns is the area draining to the street. To answer your question about specifically this drainage pattern to the east, what we looked at doing and we had it as a requirement for approval is that any lot, any lot, pardon me. Any house on Lot 2 here, that the roof drains be directed to the southwest comer here so that it wouldn't be going down this slope to the property to the east. That it'd be going to the treed area. Have a chance to dissipate the energy and go to the south. Sacchet: Great answer. Thank you Alyson. Any other questions from staff? Kurt? Papke: I just want to make sure I understand the recommendations that you're making Bob on changing the property lines there. Now it's really condition number 5 that you're using to make that happen. Is that correct? 21 Planning Commission Meng — September 6, 2005 • Generous: Yes. Papke: You're not really stipulating there how they're going to be moved. Generous: No, we're just saying that they need to comply with the 30 foot width and like I showed, there are several options that they can do. Papke: Okay. And on the preliminary plat it shows a shed on the north side of the house exactly 10 feet from the property line, so I assume that your proposal isn't going to. Generous: Would not go that far east. Papke: Okay. Sacchet: Alright. Okay, with that do we have an applicant here? If you want to come forward and if you have anything to add or. Ron Harvieux: ... good stewards of the _land and we intend to do that as we go forward with the. next two lots. Everything we've done here has been planned so that we minimize the impact. It's very beautiful land. It's a hill that we've been driving around for 26 years and it's going to change. I mean there's an issue there I think for all of us but we're trying to do that with minimal grading and so the 2 houses we're proposing, and we haven't gotten down the line far enough to answer some of the questions for the house design but we know we want to put them where they'd have minimum impact in terms of grading. And also tree preservation. We're trying to do everything we can, and there's some beautiful trees up there to hold onto them. I think in some ways the only reason we're here tonight, before the vacation of Horseshoe Curve and Balder Avenue, and I didn't want to complicate the issue earlier but Balder Avenue wasn't the only thing that was vacated. Back in 1992 there was a spur of Horseshoe Curve that came down and that's exactly where the driveway is today. That used to be called Horseshoe Curve. And Horseshoe Curve is a continuous street up above that as well, so why that was like that I don't know but at any rate when that existed we had 285 feet of frontage on public roadway. 3 houses, 90 feet apiece. 270. We had more than that. But back in 1992 when this issue came up, city staff was aware of what we were doing and the comment then was that we didn't need to have the public right-of-way. Everyone wanted to clean up this Horseshoe Curve/Balder Avenue thing and we knew that there was mechanism for variances, whatever to get access to these lots if and when we should decide to subdivide, which is what we're here for today. So the variances in question have nothing to do with lot sizes or anything like that. They have to do with this frontage on the road which is kind of a strange and little, you know strange issue that we vacated that access in 1992, but did so under the belief that we'd be able to come back and do what we're doing today which is get access through the variance method. Sacchet: And the staff report makes that very clear I think. Ron Harvieux: So with that I am going to try to answer any questions, and by the way to let you know about the hard cover. We are very, very aware. Staff has made us very aware of how 22 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — September 6, 2005 close we are to the numbers and I think it's a positive thing for us because as we design the top homes, we know what we have to live within so the process has been very helpful and I think we understand the gravity of it and we'll live there. We know what the numbers are, so. Sacchet: But the concern is not so much what you initially. The concern is when somebody lives there and all of a sudden they want a bigger porch, more deck, more patio. That's the concern. Ron Harvieux: Well decks don't count, right? Is that correct? Generous: That's correct. Ron Harvieux: Yeah, I mean that's sort of something that we can, but the hard cover we think we understand. And I get what you're saying, yeah. We can control only as far as we keep it. Sacchet: Right. We may have some questions for you. Other questions for the applicant? Dan, you have something? Keefe: Just one thing. You_know the runoff question from Lot 2, it looks like that's going to be solved by putting gutters on. But then that water's going to be running off toward your house. Ron Harvieux: Yeah, we got it through the weekend. Keefe: But I mean you know, based on this it may not be any significant. Ron Harvieux: No, we understand that. We've, Lot number 3, the house that we have is at the bottom of the hill. I mean it's been that way for, you know ever since we've been there and before we got there so, either we've been lucky or it's been built correctly or whatever but we have been able to not be problemed by that. I don't believe we will be in the future. Sacchet: I've got a few questions for you. On the plat, it looks like you're only cutting down 4 of those significant trees. Is that accurate? Ron Harvieux: Well, as I mentioned to Bob, we didn't know about the 30 foot neck lot when we submitted the plans. And I'm meeting a surveyor tomorrow to try to figure out what happens after tonight you know and what we have to do if we get the chance to go forward. Given the issue that have been raised already with size of lots and coverage, one of the options we have is to push the north/south line. This line right here. Push it eastward because Lot 2 is a large lot and we have a lot of setback here. Sacchet: But also a lot of trees. Ron Harvieux: And a lot of trees, and we've been, believe me we want to keep the trees as well. But we're investigating how we gain back the land that that 30 foot neck lot serving Lot 3, where that comes from and again, what we are under the tree coverage canopy numbers at this point by some 11,000 feet. To the plus if you will. I don't want to lose any more trees. On the other 23 Planning Commission Mee• — September 6, 2005 • hand we have to site house number 2. And there's plenty of room there. It's a question of trying to make a balance happen so in answer to your question... at this point we anticipate only taking 4 trees out. Sacchet: But it could change. Ron Harvieux: Well I don't know. Sacchet: I understand. It's a good answer. Ron Harvieux: But they'll come out only with pain on our part because we want to keep them. Sacchet: Yeah, and you basically don't want to come down further south because you have that shed and you want to keep that shed. Ron Harvieux: Well kind of do and yes, so we have to play around with some things. One of the things we talked about is making the neck lot 30 feet at the road ... and 40 feet at the point where it meets the house. Staff has asked us to move the driveway south in this neck lot and we'd like to do that. Our neighbors have asked us to do that as well. And we'd like to do that. South of ... but if you cut that back to 30 feet, there's only so much... Sacchet: ...how far you can go, right. Ron Harvieux: Yeah, we've added and we really want to protect the trees up in that neck lot. They're very beautiful and they've been there for a long time. So we're trying to find out how to affect all this and add the 30 feet to that neck lot. I think perhaps the way to do it is take this north/south line and move it a little bit east of there and when doing that. Sacchet: You move the setbacks. Ron Harvieux: We have to move the setbacks so we're pushing ourselves by the trees. I'd like not to do that and that's not the only option but that's one that kind of, since Lot 2 has a lot of land, it doesn't have a shed on it. The shed is, it sounds like it's something that should you know disappear but it's quite a significant little building so we're trying to hold on to that. Sacchet: The shed is pretty important to you I mean. Ron Harvieux: Well it is today. Tomorrow I might feel differently about it after looking at what's going on here but we'd really like to hold onto it yes. Keefe: And with movement, you also have Lot 1 has an area, potential area issue too. You know you're pretty much at the lower limit of lot size. Ron Harvieux: That's right, so we have to build it back. I mean we can't move, yeah. ►LI Planning Commission Mee — September 6, 2005 • Sacchet: Now I'd like to stay on this topic just a little bit more because I mean the potential that moving that north/south lot line west, or is it east? Ron Harvieux: East. Sacchet: Cutting more trees would be for me a reason to actually ask you not to move that lot line. And then that would leave the north and south variables to try to accommodate, but you think that could be done too, right? But you haven't studied it so I don't... Ron Harvieux: ...land we're giving up to make that 30 foot neck lot happen. You know we'd like to take the land out of Lot 3, and we can't do that by ... it becomes an angle. Sacchet: It's a little harder to manage. But on the other hand it would make Lot 1 a little bigger too because there isn't a constraint too with impervious. So you wouldn't feel that it couldn't be done if we can move this north/south line. Okay. Okay. I think that's all my questions for you. Any other questions for the applicant? No? Alright. Thank you very much. Now this is a public hearing. Anybody want to address this item, this is your chance. Please come forward. State your name and address for the record and let us know what you have to say. Don Miller: My name is Don Miller. I live at 395 Pleasant View Road. We're directly north of this proposed. The only, the biggest question I have is, there's 3 trees there ... and we want to save those trees. Sacchet: So you're the house right above it there. Don Miller: I'm right there, yep. Our concern and we've talked to them about it and they're absolutely with us is we want to get this driveway as far apart from our house because we're very close to that side. In recent surveys we've lost another 3 feet so it's to our advantage to have their driveway moved. If you run the driveway between the 2 trees, I think it's these 2 right here, that's 23 feet. They're not parallel. They're kind of at an angle but if you use the perpendicular distance there's 23 feet. You can't get a 30 foot thing through there. You can't get 43 foot thing through there and you can't stay without being under the crown of the trees. Sacchet: We're not talking about the driveway being that wide. Don Miller: ...construction traffic and whatever is necessary to build, it's going to kill those 2 trees. I think you should move the driveway, it's also right here there's a stop sign. So you're not going to be able to come out of the driveway and make a right turn onto Pleasant View. If you can move that farther, closer to Lot 1's line, it will change this line and put the driveway maybe down here so that it comes because they're proposing to stay away from that big tree. These are the two important trees on the lot. This is another one. These are a couple small ones here. If you can get it down through there, it still doesn't obstruct this lot. It gives better access and keeps it away from the stop sign and it also keeps it away from our driveway. So you can camouflage it with some other trees and it compliments all 3 lots now. 25 Planning Commission M• g — September 6, 2005 • Sacchet: I would certainly like that too if I was where you are. Thank you. Appreciate it. Anybody else want to address this. This is your chance. Please state your name and address for the record. Joe Pfankuch: My name's Joe Pfankuch and I live at 6611 Horseshoe Curve. Two lots to the west and you know none of this directly affects me. My concern is, I'm not sure what the minimum lot sizes are but if you look at the general area, I would say these are the smallest lots that have been developed on this shore in a while. I don't know maybe you've gone through that Ron but I'm on the lake because someone subdivided their lot as well but I have an acre and they have .9 acres, and I guess I look at it and this is screaming subdivision, cramming houses together and that neighborhood really has it's charm because there's a lot of trees and you really can't see all the houses and so I look at this and say now we're going to have 3 driveways coming right out to where the stop sign is. Actually really 4 driveways because, 4 houses because there's the original lot. The lot, this lot and then the Jamison's lot there all coming to that notorious intersection of Pleasant View Road and Horseshoe Curve at the top of a two way hill. And someone proposing to develop across the street from that. I look at this and my only two issues, I don't have any trees near that they're going to cut down my house won't be affected is the safety issue. From where all that ends. And then also just the size of the lot because we can say now that those trees will stay, but I've been around long enough to see people on South Shore Drive cut down trees that was on park property. You know people just like to have views of a lake and so I get a little nervous that all of a sudden there's just going to be a little more clear cutting, and I don't know what regulations are involved in that but. So my question is I guess to Ron and Leanne are more why 3 lots. Why not 2? And is there a minimum size variance and does this truly accommodate it? Sacchet: We do have, the limit is 15,000 feet, or 15,000. Joe Pfankuch: And this is 14? Sacchet: And this, the whole lot here is, it's almost 2 acres. It's 1.99 acres. For the 1, 2, 3 together. And so in terms of the ordinance of the city, the applicant is totally within their rights to make it into 3 lots. Joe Pfankuch: What do the lots end up as? Roughly. Sacchet: The little more is a little more than 15,000. That's Lot 1. Lot 2 is almost 24,000 and Lot 3 is 47 so that's still over an acre. Joe Pfankuch: But is that consistent with the neighborhood or does that not come into effect? Sacchet: We can't, from the city side, we, the ordinance states it has to be a minimum of 15,000 so that's... Ron Harvieuz: ...the home on top of the hill. RON 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — September 6, 2005 Sacchet: If maybe you want to come up afterwards, but let's finish with his comments. If you want to respond, that certainly will be appropriate. But the other aspect is the safety aspect and I think that is a question that we want to address with probably the city engineer. Joe Pfankuch: And then also the watershed. I noticed that Alyson's you know showed that Lot 1 kind of draining primarily towards the street. Anyone who lives on that street knows that that's where the big puddle is because there's a major drainage issue there and the city tried to rectify it with the sewer but still after days like last week, you know we get big puddles there. And so I'm wondering does that water add to that? Again at a stop sign. Really that driveway's a hill. You know are we creating something. Sacchet: So we have two aspects. One is the drainage and the other one is the safety in terms of traffic I believe. If you can address that. Joe Pfankuch: And I think Ron's point, the yellow house, the Santana house has been authorized to subdivide as well, so now all of a sudden you're going to have a lot of driveways converging at that point and a lot of watershed so maybe just explain to me how this all works out in the big picture. Sacchet: And that is the city responsibility to make sure those aspects are considered and mitigated. Joe Pfankuch: Because the two properties across from us, the old, I don't know what Betty's name was, house, and the Santana house, I mean those are now proposed subdivisions so we now go from 3 houses to about 9 very quickly and I want to know what the overall impact is to that intersection and to the safety there. If someone could respond to that. Sacchet: Appreciate your comment. You want to give that a shot Alyson? Morris: Thank you. First regarding the drainage. We do realize that there's increased drainage areas to that intersection. I did do some calculations. With the increased area, increased impervious, it's quite minimal. I was unaware that there was a ponding problem at that intersection. As everybody's aware with the storm that the city had recently here, drainage problems do come up. I can talk to the street superintendent. See what we can do in that area hopefully to increase the safety of that intersection and not exacerbate the problem. Secondly, with regards to the safety of the actual intersection, staff's recommendation was to shift that driveway to Lot 2, to the south for that very reason. When we did the site visit, looking at the location of that lot line, pardon me with the driveway, and with respect to where that stop sign was, it was quite apparent that that was not a good location for the driveway and that's why the recommendation came. To shift it south. Sacchet: So if it's shifted within that 40 foot, would that make enough of a different or if now we're even talking that maybe that would be reduced to a 30 foot at the opening up there. How does that play together? 27 �i Planning Commission Mee —September 6, 2005 • Morris: It would ideal to have a larger distance but looking at the location of the lot lines and it's one lot. We just asked him to move it as far south as possible to add to the safety. To help with safety at that intersection. As far as increased traffic at that intersection you're adding 2 lots. You typically will, that will add about 8 trips a day. Sacchet: Which is relatively trivial. Morris: Which is quite small. I believe that was, were the 3? Sacchet: That was the questions. Yeah, you can come back. Joe Pfankuch: That was two. My third question, again Joe Pfankuch is, what's the overall impact with the other two developments that you either are approving or have approved. Both on Pleasant View and I think Santana's address is Pleasant View as well because all of that is going to converge and so I want to know how those 9 houses are all going to, where the driveways are going to be and how it's going to end up. That also is a potential bus stop depending on where the houses, number of students are at the top of that hill as well for the Minnetonka school system. So I'm, now all of a sudden if we add these kids here, that's a bus stop and you have 3 driveways, a dangerous intersection on top of the hill, I just you know, I want to have some long term vision as to how this is all going to play out. Sacchet: Thank you. Can you say anything about that? I mean 9 houses is still not going to be really a huge traffic impact is it. Morris: Unfortunately Planning Commission, I'm not familiar with the proposed developments that the neighbor is talking about. I wasn't actually employed at the city at the time that that came about and I'm having a difficulty visualizing where that, where those connections are. Generous: The Kenyon Bluff one's on the north side of Pleasant View I believe and that was a 3 lot subdivision that would access onto Pleasant View. I'm not aware of the other one. It might be a future. Sacchet: What I recall is that subdivisions were relatively small. I mean we're not talking about somebody bringing in a dozen new places. It's just like onsies and twosies. Generous: Yeah, one's and two's. That's what I remembered too. Sacchet: And from that angle I mean from a traffic engineering viewpoint, the impact would be quite minimal. If you look at those type of quantities of buildings. Joe Pfankuch: If we could zoom in, excuse me. Joe Pfankuch again. If we could zoom in on the subject site. As Pleasant View Road comes up and makes that comer, this is the Kenyon lot. This is the Santana lot. This is going to 3. This is now 3 off the shared driveway with that one, off the Miller's driveway which comes out right there. I don't know where that development is. The house that's for sale and I would guess is going to get split into at least 2 lots. Just my concern is the long term plan as to how all that intersects because this is a blind comer coming 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — September 6, 2005 up this hill. It's a blind comer coming up that hill, and I don't care if it's one driveway or two houses or three houses but we have 9, and they all come at a very dangerous place. So we're not setting something up that if they have any children, it's an even more dangerous intersection. I'm just saying where's the big picture on all of this and I have small children so I'm concerned from that aspect. Sacchet: Yeah you may definitely. Ron Harvieux: My first comment, it's a busy road there at Pleasant View and Horseshoe Curve is stopped at Pleasant View. Horseshoe Curve is a feeder road. Both of the driveways we're proposing here would exit onto Horseshoe Curve, the small, it's not a freeway. It's a blind intersection. When people enter Horseshoe Curve they haven't dealt with a blind intersection. There's truth that that intersection's tough but that's a whole different issue. These driveways will exit onto a relatively benign road called Horseshoe Curve. Yes, they'll have a stop sign in when they try to enter Pleasant View but so do 40 other houses that come up Horseshoe Curve. We're just not pushing people onto the Pleasant View. Sacchet: And certainly it's a very valid point that we have to look at the context but ultimately we can't keep one property owner hostage to something that affects the whole neighborhood. But then you could say on the other hand, well that's how problem rise because everybody does something and it adds up and adds up and adds up but I mean we have no legal foundation to hold that against one proposal in front of us. So even we try to consider that and be sensitive to that to the full extent possible, but there's so far we can go with that. It's public hearing is still open. Anybody else want to address this. Please come forward. Yes you can come back if you want. Don Miller: Is there any reason that, Don Miller again. 395 Pleasant View. Lot 1 and 2, that you can't run a driveway so you only have one entrance there. Sacchet: Why don't you put it so we see it. Okay Don Miller: I'm not trying to re-engineer everything that everybody's done ... so you propose keep it as far south as you can and away from this intersection. You know how you've made that one or maybe one wide driveway or something where you both converge together. Sacchet: Can it be done? I mean just about anything can be done. Don Miller: That makes it easier for the Harvieux's to develop too because... Sacchet: Right, no I see your point. Alright. Anybody else want to address this item? Yep, there's somebody more. If you please state your name and address for the record. Let us know what you have to say please. Steve Wanek: My name is Steve Wanek. I live at 6615 Horseshoe Curve. Just down the street and I just have one question regarding the need for a variance for this proposal. I was kind of under the understanding that it's more of an administrative issue. But they're asking for 29 Planning Commission Mee• — September 6, 2005 • variances. Why, what, where are variances being granted on this property I guess and why are they being granted? Sacchet: Can you clarify that please Bob? Thank you Generous: Yes, Mr. Chairman. The variances are for access via a neck lot rather than having a full frontage on the public street. Our ordinance says you can have neck lots but they have to comply with standards and to approve them as part of a subdivision process you have to grant the variance. So a lot of times the variances for house orientation and things like that are setbacks or compromises if you wanted to make it specific conditions to mitigate it so. Sacchet: So the variance is how the lots are being accessed basically. Generous: Correct. Sacchet: And that's a function of those vacated right-of-way's and so forth. Alright. Do we have anybody else? Yes we do. Please come forward and share your wisdom. Debbie Lloyd: Debbie Lloyd, 7302 Laredo Drive. You answered a lot of the questions I had. I only had about an hour to look at this tonight and I had a lot of questions from the staff report, but the predominant thing hanging out in my mind here remains the fact that the easement was vacated in 1992 with the premise that a private street could be put in. And the private street had a different name as private drive but basically the premise is the same. That a private street could access 3 to 4 homes. Our private street ordinances are there so that you can put in the private street instead of a public street, and that should help alleviate environmental concerns. Now the flag lot is a different issue but you know for large subdivisions we always look at what would the private street look like versus the public street and I think in this instance we're cutting ourselves short by not looking at what would the private street look like here, versus the flag lot. The access to the existing home though is a shared driveway. Now you're changing positions. You're splitting a lot. That shared driveway should become a private street. Sacchet: Technically it is a private street, yeah. Debbie Lloyd: It is but it probably doesn't have today's standards of a private street. It probably doesn't have the same width. The 30 foot is essentially. Now when they gave up the easement, they did gain land, correct? I mean that easement. Sacchet: Well actually it looks like the easement was beyond the property line if I read this plat correctly. Is that accurate Bob? Generous: They did get a little bit of land. The property to the west kept the majority of it. Debbie Lloyd: But they did get you know some property with the dedication. With that easement being abandoned. And so I think that has to be looked at. There may be an opportunity, I'm not, you guys know, I'm not into slope of land and all this stuff other than I think the driveway issues and the slope of the land is important. That can't be overlooked. What 30 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — September 6, 2005 is the slope of the driveway here? That hasn't been assessed but could not the driveway, the private street come in and serve all lots? Have one access. Alleviate some of the stress on that road. Granted there's 3 trees we're talking about saving up here. It may impact a tree or 2 in another area but I think there's some alternatives that need to be addressed. Sacchet: I think that one of the issues we ... look at is grading. Is that something you could address Alyson? I mean how possible is it to feed Lot 2 into that driveway? Just hypothetically. Is it at all possible? Morris: Onto the common driveway? Sacchet: Yeah. With those grade changes I kind of wonder. Debbie Lloyd: It's called a private street. We don't have common driveway in our code anymore, just it's one of those irksome things I keep hearing different names for what our code says and it's private street. So I'm sorry I'm not. Sacchet: It's alright. You want to say something to that Alyson please. Morris: It's a question of moving this driveway through here or this driveway through here? Debbie Lloyd: I wonder if there's anyway that you could bring it, like I said. It's ... the private street to somehow share all access on the street. Morris: So looking at the two proposals of having the private street right here, currently this driveway is proposed at 9.8% maximum lot by ordinance is 10%. Bringing this driveway, that proposed retaining wall that we discussed earlier, the grades to go from this garage to this private street would be in excess of 10%. Would not meet our ordinance. As far as accessing it for Lot 2 onto here, the reason staff didn't push for that is the environmental impact. There's some trees, some oak trees, a hickory tree. Didn't meet the significant tree requirements but some shrubs through here that staff just felt it was preferable to maintain the treed area through here and have access through here than to use this as a shared driveway location. It was a judgment call that staff made at this point and we just felt that in the name of tree preservation, that Lot 2 would access off Horseshoe Curve. Should access. We recommend that that is accessed off Horseshoe Curve. Sacchet: Good answer. Thank you. Anything else you want to add? Debbie Lloyd: I highly recommend this be 30 foot as code. I mean it should meet code requirements. It should be a private street because it is, and when you subdivide I would think that you have to maintain what the present code. The other thing, condition 5. You know I can understand that all these things are up in the air but you know I just saw Lake Harrison go through. You saw what has happened on Lake Harrison today, you'd probably flip out. Sacchet: I live there Debbie. 31 V Planning Commission Meeting — September 6, 2005 • Debbie Lloyd: Okay. So you are flipping out. Sacchet: Well it's not just Lake Harrison. It's also the other ones around there. There's 3 of them happening. Debbie Lloyd: You know I think perhaps this should go back to the drawing table with what all of these if s are. Let's put in the right, let's put in where it's going to be. Let's make sure the retaining walls are where they're going to be. Let's make sure the impervious surface is right. Sacchet: This is a subdivision. I mean we're not quite there yet are we? Generous: We're not building a house on a lot, no. Debbie Lloyd: But the preliminary plat. Sacchet: All that we have, and please connect me if this is not accurate Bob. We have a subdivision in front of us so the pads, the idea of where the building is is totally hypothetical at this point just to show us what it could be and as Bob pointed out for Lot 2, they purposely asked to show a very large house that most likely will be smaller so that we can see. Debbie Lloyd: I'm not asking for the house pad. Sacchet: Okay. Debbie Lloyd: I'm asking for the streets to be in the right, the driveways to be in the correct place. The retaining walls to be in the proper place. I mean condition 5 is a huge condition. The move, it says in the report here that the movement of that 30, let's see. The applicant shall revise the plat to incorporate a 30 foot neck for Lot 3. Well back here in the report itself it says, the applicant shall revise the plat to incorporate the 30 foot neck for Lot 3. This will result in the reconfiguration of Lot 1. Lot 1 which is already 15,152 feet. I mean that's close to the minimum. This will result, and possibly on Lot 2. So you know I just think there's a lot of questions. I've just seen these go on to council and without all the details being attended to, things get passed that maybe aren't really ready. That's my, I think that's the, that's really the short of it tonight, thank you. Sacchet: Thanks Debbie. Appreciate your comments. Anybody else wants to address this. Seeing nobody get up, I'll close the public hearing. Bring it back to commission. Comments. Kurt, looks like you're ready. Papke: Yeah. I think there's the applicant here has gone through a number of permutations with staff. I think it's in reasonably good shape. The only issue I have is with condition number 32, and this gets to the safety issue with the access for Lot 2 and the proximity to Pleasant View. I think we need to tighten that up a little bit. It just says to relocate it to the south. I think that needs to be nailed down a little bit. To Debbie's point so we know exactly what that's going to be, but other than that I think it's in pretty reasonable shape. 32 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — September 6, 2005 Sacchet: Thanks Kurt. Anything from you Debbie? Larson: Well you know, it looks, as Kurt said ... and they've been working with staff and trying to keep the... That's very important today. So I am willing to go with it at this point. Sacchet: Okay. Deborah. Zorn: I share some of the same comments that have been mentioned. My only concern is that driveway getting to Lot 2 and knowing that Pleasant View Road, it is very difficult to see up around the bend as you're driving, yet alone just trying to get out of a driveway so I would hope that the applicant would look at that in greater detail and placement of that driveway. Sacchet: Okay. Zorn: But otherwise I would support it. Sacchet: Jerry. McDonald: Well I guess in looking at this, there has been quite a bit of work that's gone into it. On the issue of the driveway, you know we're looking at 30 feet. It's only a 40 foot wide swath through there and to move it to the south then I guess we have to give up that one tree. It possibly could be worth it. That's something that I think the applicant needs to look at and he's kind of given indications to us that he would. His driveway again that's going to fall upon him to meet the 30 foot requirement again for the private street. When this is subdivided it has to meet requirements and it will. It's just it will all fall upon his property. I feel it should be shared but I understand that that can't be done so I think the applicant also understands that. I also had some issues about the hard surface coverage and I guess from what I've heard from the applicant, he understands what those numbers are. He'll work with those. I don't expect to see him back here when we're re -doing these houses and everything and asking for a half a percent or even a percentage variance for anything such as that. And yeah, I guess to address the issue of detail. This is a subdivision. There is no detail so that's part of why we do this and then ask the applicant to come back and you've got to live within certain criteria which are the codes and everything for these lots. There are setback requirements. Those will all have to be met. You know he understands all of that. So I don't have any problem approving this. I guess I live in that area also. I'm very familiar with that curve. Where we're talking about where the stop sign is, the majority of the traffic is on Pleasant View Road. Yeah, Pleasant View Road and that is a problem that the city's going to have to address sooner or later. It's not really for the applicant at this point to have to do that but that is a problem area and it's been that way for 20 years. Yes, it's going to get a lot worst because of all the development that's happening down there and at some point the city will have to do something about that roadway, but for right now what we're looking at before us, again everybody will come out onto Horseshoe Curve. There is a stop sign there. They will have to make the same adjustments everyone else who lives on Horseshoe Curve has to make. So from that standpoint I don't see a big issue there with the traffic that can't be managed that isn't already being managed. Beyond that, yeah I'd be interested to see what the compromises are knowing what you've heard today as far as the neck lot. What's going to happen there because there is some concern on Lot 1. You're going to have to push 33 Planning Commission Meeting — September 6, 2005 • something there and at that point you may go below the minimums or you may all of a sudden find yourself up against some of the setbacks so that's going to be a balancing act there. But yeah, I would agree with what staff's put forward and I'd be in favor of this. Sacchet: Okay, thanks Jerry. Dan. Keefe: Just in a little bit of clarification in regards to what exactly we're approving. We're approving a preliminary plat. I mean what exactly does the preliminary plat do? Sacchet: Do you want to explain that Bob? Generous: A preliminary plat provides standing for the applicant. They can go forward and do the final subdivision, provided they comply with the conditions of approval within the preliminary plat. Shifting the lot lines or whatever. And provided that the final plat complies with ordinance. Keefe: Okay so for them, and in terms of process, does the preliminary plat go to the City Council or does the final? Generous: Preliminary plat goes to City Council. Final plat also goes to City Council. Keefe: Okay, but it won't come back here right? Generous: It won't come back here, no. Keefe: Okay. You know generally like the layout of this. I'm curious a little bit about private street but I'm, you know I know you guys considered that and looked at that so I'm going to go with the thought that you guys have put a lot of effort into this and with your recommendation. do like the fact that the driveways go out on Horseshoe Curve versus impacting Pleasant View Road because as one of the residents said, I do think there's a potential hazard on that particular corner, particularly with the new developments coming in. In regards to preliminary plat with the conditions, I guess I'd be in favor of them. Sacchet: Okay. You know, I keep emphasizing that the role of the Planning Commission is to see, does this fit with the ordinances and regulations of the city and it really does. I mean this fits well. The one thing we have a little bit of a conflict is the area where they need a variance which is with that driveway access aspect, but other than that we really don't have jurisdiction to tell them where they should route their driveways or whether they should make their lots bigger if they meet the minimum, which they do. However, if we could I would certainly suggest to the applicant that I would think the shed is less important than the trees and having those lots so close to the impervious surface, but that's not my judgment. I mean I'm out of my context by saying that, but just to give you the example in terms of where our focus is as a Planning Commission. This meets the regulations and I think the variance is very appropriate, especially looking at the history of how this came about. I think the applicant is totally within their right to do this configuration. I would like to add a little more of the specifics, like you started doing that Kurt and then Debbie you certainly hit on that. The condition number 5 about the 30 foot neck 34 Planning Commission Mee — September 6, 2005 • requirement and how that needs a little more land. I would want to be very specific and ask that the north/south property line. That eastern property line of Lot 1 is not pushed further west, if at all possible. Work with staff on that because it's going to push it further into the slope and into the trees. But again we have to be careful how far we can go with that because we don't want to infringe on the rights of the property owner to configure this, how it may be a work with staff would be appropriate rather than make it a firm condition. I think that would certainly be within our rights into how we express ourselves from the city. Similar I would suggest that we say something like staff, or applicant will work with staff and it will investigate or look at the safety issues of the access onto the road there. I do have a question with the recommendation, it's number 32 that the driveway to Lot 2 be shifted as far south as possible. That doesn't necessarily mean that another tree needs to be cut. That's just, I mean the driveway can curve around the tree and so I want to be clear about that. And then the question also that came up that we have not touched on, I think one of the neighbors brought that up, in terms of the construction traffic going onto Lot 2, weaving around those oaks. I mean what's going to happen to those roots? I mean they're going to be damaged. Is that something that needs to be looked at? Has the City Forester had any input on that or, do we, I mean I assume that the construction traffic will go where the driveway will be. And that means you're driving around those oaks and I think that's a very valid comment that the neighbor brought up, that we're basically killing those by doing that. Or at least hurting. So that's maybe another, an aspect where I would say work with staff and maybe that the City Forester could get their recommendation and then see whether there's any way that can be mitigated to the point that these trees have a realistic chance to survive, which is in everybody's interest. Property owner and most. I think that's all the comments I have so unless there is any other comments, Kurt. Do you want to comment or make a motion? Papke: Make a motion. Sacchet: Go for the motion then please. Joe Pfankuch: Mr. Chairman? Sacchet: Yes. Joe Pfankuch: Is there a statute about the distance a driveway from a stop sign? Sacchet: Is there? Is that something you could address Alyson? Joe Pfankuch: And what is the distance? In this case and for these... I know you can't park within 10-15 feet so I've got to believe you can't have a driveway. Isn't it 30 feet? Morris: As far as state statute, I'm not aware if there is a limit or not. Sacchet: Yeah, I don't know the exact answer without researching it but there are different requirements based on what the road is classified as. Like if it's an arterial road, I'm sure there are restrictions. If it's a neighborhood type road like that I would think that it's much more relaxed so I don't know what the specifics are but I want to point out it's important to see the 35 Planning Commission M — September 6, 2005 • context. I mean it's a busy road. I'm sure there are all kinds of restrictions with the neighborhood, and that's, and I don't know what Pleasant View is classified. Is that a collector? Generous: Pleasant View, yes. Sacchet: It's a collector so there is probably more restrictive while Horseshoe Curve has a neighborhood type of road, is probably relatively small, if any restriction in that context. Joe Pfankuch: Well as Jerry pointed out that this problem, this intersection has a problem. That point is we concur so the really simple question is, is this adding or deleting tisk from that? From that area and so I just don't want, because think about people have parties and they park in the street. I mean I've lived there only 6 years but long enough to see what happened and it's a very narrow road to begin with, and so I look at an intersection that we've already admitted by City Council we're going to have to improve at some point, are we ... that stop sign thing a little bit and everything. Sacchet: Yeah, I appreciate your comment and the public hearing has been closed. And I think we touched on that before. Really that it's an issue in a larger context. I mean it's an issue for the neighborhood, and yes, this development has an impact on it but it's one of multiple things that impact that so, and we can't really solve a neighborhood issue here. We're looking at a subdivision and how it applies to the ordinances so I don't mean to shirk the issue but we have to kind of stay on task at the same time, so Kurt you were going to make a motion. Papke: Yes. Mr. Chair, I'd like to recommend approval of the preliminary plat for Harvieux Addition with a variance for the use of flag lots, plans prepared by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc. dated 8/04/05, based on the findings of fact attached to this report and subject to conditions 1 through 34 with two changes in wording. Condition number 5. The applicant shall revise the plat to incorporate a 30 foot neck lot for Lot 3 and to work with staff to minimize western movement of the east lot line for Lot number 1. And an alteration to condition number 32. To relocate Lot 2 driveway access to the south as much as feasible without loss of the western most 34 inch oak tree. Sacchet: Do we have a second? McDonald: I'll second. Sacchet: We have a second. Let me try a friendly amendment to see whether we're still within our rights. If we expand another little quirk to condition 32. Applicant shall work with staff to mitigate as much as possible the construction traffic access around those trees. I mean does that do anything? I mean I'm wondering whether, what do you think Alyson? Moms: We could put a recommendation in there Chair. It's called... plowing and it's a system where you go in and they cut a root system of a tree out to an extent so that you're not driving on the root system of the tree and that's something that we can look in, in an instance such as this where you've cut the roots of the trees so that the traffic over it would not damage that root system. 36 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — September 6, 2005 Sacchet: So there are things that could be investigated. I wouldn't go as far as want to say you have to do this or that, but go ahead Bob. Generous: Mr. Chairman there is also a bridging mechanism that they can incorporate it over root zones. Sacchet: So indeed there would be something to work with staff. Papke: Okay, so your friendly amendment is to work with staff to take actions to minimize root damage to the historically significant trees there? Sacchet: Yes, specifically by the construction traffic. Papke: Okay, I accept that. Sacchet: Okay. Alright. Yes Bob, you want to add something to that? Generous: Mr. Chair a point of clarification on that condition 5. Sacchet: Yep. Generous: You said minimize, was it eastern movement of the easterly lot line? Sacchet: The eastern lot line of Lot 1. Generous: Correct. We don't want it to go any further east. Sacchet We don't want it further east. We want to minimize that. I mean we don't want to go as far as say it can't be moved but we would definitely want to minimize it. Generous: Thank you. Sacchet: Alright. Alright, we have a motion and a second. We have some friendly amendments. Papke moved, McDonald seconded that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the preliminary plat for Harvieux Addition with a variance for the use of flag lots, plans prepared by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc. dated 8/04/05, based on the findings of fact attached to this report and subject to the following conditions: Only trees shown on the preliminary plat as being removed shall be allowed. No trees are to be removed on Lot 1. Four trees are allowed to be removed on Lot 2. Any other trees removed shall be replaced at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. KA 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — September 6, 2005 2. Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the grading/clearing limits prior to any construction activities and shall remain in place until construction is complete. 3. Detailed grading, drainage, tree removal, and erosion control plans will be required for Lots 1 and 2 at the time of building permit application. 4. The front lot lines for Lots 2 and 3 are the westerly lot lines. 5. Neck/flag lots must, by definition, be a minimum of 30 feet wide. The applicant shall revise the plat to incorporate a 30 foot neck for Lot 3 and to work with staff to minimize western movement of the east lot line for Lot number 1. 6. If grading will be done, a final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. 8. Addresses for each home must be posted on Horseshoe Curve and on each home. 9. No burning permits will be issued. Trees must either be chipped or removed from site. 10. Builder/developer must comply with Chanhassen Fire Department Policy #29-1991 regarding premise identification. 11. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Tvne of Slope Time Steeper than 3:1 7 days 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area is not actively being worked.) 12. The existing erosion control fence drawing shall be replaced with City of Chanhassen detail plate 5300. 13. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. 14. Any hard surfaces (e.g. retaining walls, patios, decks, sidewalks) that may be needed shall be illustrated on the proposed subdivision plan to ensure maximum impervious coverage is not exceeded. 15. The plans shall show the ordinary high water level (OHW) of Lotus Lake (896.3) and the required 75 foot setback. 0 0 Planning Commission Meeting — September 6, 2005 16. The applicant shall pay for the total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording. At this time the estimated fee is $7,558.00. 17. The developer shall pay full park fees for the two new lots at the time of final plat recording. 18. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPGA, MN Department of Health, MCES, and Watershed District. 19. Show the benchmark used for the site survey. 20. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. 21. Extend the silt fence to the north along the west side. 22. Add a note to the plan: All sanitary services must be 6 inch PVC-SDR26 and water service 1 inch copper. 23. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the city with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 24. The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges are applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 truck hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. 25. All disturbed areas as a result of construction must be seeded and mulched or sodded immediately after grading to minimize erosion. 26. Add the following City detail plates to the plans: 2001, 5200, 5300, and 5301. 27. Gutters must be installed on the house on Lot 2 and must discharge to the southwest comer. 28. Submit a security to ensure that the street cuts are properly restored to city standards. 29. The applicant should be aware that any retaining wall more than 4 feet in height must be designed by a structural engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Also, it will require a building permit through the City's Building Department. 30. Maximum side slope is 3:1, adjust 956' contour north of proposed house on Lot 2 accordingly. 31. Cleanouts are required at all bends of the sanitary sewer service or every 90 feet, whichever is less. 32. Relocate Lot 2 driveway access to the south along Lot 1 northerly property line as much as feasible without loss of the western most 34 inch oak tree. 39 Planning Commission Meting — September 6, 2005 • 33. Standard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated over the front, side and rear yards within the subdivision. 34. A cross access and maintenance agreement shall be recorded over Lot 3 for the benefit of Lot 46, Pleasant View Addition for the existing driveway. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Sacchet: We wish you luck with this. This goes to the City Council, it's scheduled for the 20s of September so if the neighbors want to follow it through the process, I don't know whether City Council does take comments or not. Sometimes they do. But basically the public hearing is what we do here at the Planning Commission and then City Council reviews that and depending on what the situation is, they may or may not take further comments. PROPERTY LOCATED ON LOT 4. BLOCK 2, CHANHASSEN WEST BUSINESS PARK, APPLICANT MINGER CONSTRUCTION, PLANNING CASE 05-27. Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Sacchet: Thank you Bob. Questions from staff. Any questions? Not really. I do have a few questions. So I want to be real clear because I wasn't here when the overall thing was looked at, and when I first looked at this particular design I was a little bit concerned about how many trees we're actually cutting here. I mean I went out there and they're fantastic trees. I mean there's not a sick tree that I could spot. They're all in really good shape. It's a beautiful, beautiful grove of trees here. We're cutting most of them here that are on this lot. I mean we have a few token trees maybe so basically in terms of the overall development we balanced that by that, it's an outlot that remains wooded and that. Generous: That is correct. It will be a conservation easement dedicated over this. If Nann you could go to the overhead. I don't know it's difficult to see but if you look at this site, the significant band of trees in existing conditions run through here. The applicant is actually putting the shared, the private street on the property to the north so that they're able to preserve this area. Then the building will be located back over where it's more open. There may be some shrub trees back there but nothing that showed up as significant on the survey, so they are doing a good job on this lot of preserving the significant trees out there now. Sacchet: Yeah but my point is actually different from that Bob. I mean what I'm saying is that I feel they're cutting a lot there. Yes they're saving a little sliver there but there's this outlot on the north of this whole development that's going to be preserved, right? What you pointed out before. I want to be very clear about that because that's important in terms of balance of this whole thing. Generous: Correct. 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 0 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Todd Gerhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that he is and was on August 25, 2005, the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date he caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Harvieux Subdivision with Variances — Planning Case No. 05-26 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sww to before me thi day of 2005. _ T I Notary P lic J#Notary KIM T. MELMSSEN Public-MinnesotaY Comm.... Ev Jen 31,2010 SCANNED Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, September 6, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition Proposal: (6605 Horseshoe Curve) into three lots with Variances — HARVIEUX SUBDIVISION Planning File: 05-26 Applicant: Ronald Harvieux Property Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition (6605 Horseshoe Curve) Location: I A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Questions & e-mail boenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide this project, please contact Bob Generous at 952-227-1131 or Questions & e-mail boenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of be available online at h1tp://206.10.76.6/weblink7 the the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialAindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Date & Time: Tuesday, September 6 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition Proposal: (6605 Horseshoe Curve) into three lots with Variances — HARVIEUX SUBDIVISION Planning File: 05-26 Applicant: Ronald Harvieux Property Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition (6605 Horseshoe Curve) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous at 952-227-1131 or Questions & e-mail boenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at htta://206.10.76.6/weblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciavindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Plannina Staff person named on the notification. Lotus Lake ct Site This nap is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a coniodation of recordss, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regardng the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare Mis me, are error free, and the City does not represent Mat Me GIS Data can be used for navigational, backing or any other purpose requiring ewacting measurement of distance or direction or preddon in Me depiction of geographic features. 9 errors or discrepancies are found please corrtact 952-22]-110]. The preceding disdaner is prpvided pursuers to Minnesota Suabnes §496.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this nap xloomeedges Mat the City shall no be liable for any damages. and eipressly waives all dams, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold hamyess Me City from any and all dams brought by User, 4s employee; or agents, or mud parties which arse out of the users access or use of data provided. Lotus Lake Subject Site Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city. county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error Irae, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, traclung or any other purpose requinng enacting measurement of distance or directi or precision in the depiction of geographic features. N emors or discrepancies am found please contact 952-22]-110]. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, SUDS. 21 (2000). and Me user of Iris map acknowledges that the City shall not De liable for any damages, acl elgressly waives all dams, and agrees to defend. Indertnify, and hold harmless Me City from any and all Barre brought by User, its encloyess or agents, or Mid parties which arse our of the users access or use of data provided. E « NAME1» «NAME2» ti «ADD2o «CITY» ((STATE)) «ZIP» «Next Record»«NAM ED «NAME2» «ADDU «ADD2» « CITY» «STATE» «ZIP» • • Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Harvieux Subdivision Planning Case No. 05-26 6605 Horseshoe Curve City of Chanhassen ,t Subject Site Lotus Lake RICIA PAUL TRUSTEE A F TRU EMILY H JOHNSON NICHOLAS J P PERKINS TRUSTEE OF TRUST MN 55438 335 PLEASANT VIEW RD 339 PLEASANT VIEW RD BLOOMINGTON MN 11010 OREGON CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHRISTOPHER D ARNOLDY & KALLEY T YANTA MICHELE F ARNOLDY TRUSTEE OF TRUST BASIL LAWRENCE TIVY 350 PLEASANT VIEW RD 365 PLEASANT VIEW RD 370 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DONALD J & DARLENE M MILLER GARY W & MARY ANN MCCAULEY JAMES T & DIANE S LESTOR 395 PLEASANT VIEW RD 420 PLEASANT VIEW RD 429 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CBR DEVELOPMENT LLC KELBIN ROBERT BAILEY RONALD E & LEANNE HARVIEUX TRUSTEES OF TRUST 4550 WESTON LN N 6580 PLEASANT VIEW WAY PLYMOUTH MN 55446 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANN DANIELSON RAYMOND P & ALICIA L BROZOVICH JOSEPH M & MARGERY M 6607 HORSESHOE CRV 6609 HORSESHOE CRV PFANKUCH CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHA HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVEN M GULLICKSON & DAVID W SANTANA & STEPHEN J & JEANNIE L WANEK JENNIFER H GULLICKSON DEBRA C SCHULTZ 6613 HORSESHOE CRV6614 HORSESHOE CRV 6615 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROBERT L & ELVA HANSEN LADD R & SUSAN M CONRAD RICHARD R & KATHLEEN E PECK 6620 HORSESHOE CRV 6625 HORSESHOE CRV 6690 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANDREW H & KATRINA E CLEMENS CHARLES C & JANET C HURD SANDRA LEE OLSON 6691 HORSESHOE CRV 6695 HORSESHOE CRV 6696 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JOHN R & CAROL W HAMMETT BRACE D HELGESON 6697 HORSESHOE CRV 7820 TERREY PINE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05.26 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, September 6, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council ChambersinChanhassenCityllaU, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of thishearingistoconsiderarequest for Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition (6605 Horseshoe Curve) into three tots with Variances-Harvieux Subdivision. Applicant: Ronald Harvieux. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hail during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Bob Generous, Senior Planner haenaro+ (� i h h Email: n n Phone: 952.227. 1131 (Published intheChanhassenviliager an Thursday, August 25, 2005; No. Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 33IA.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No.y� was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this ,2:5� y ofi rZZ , 2005 Notary Public RATE INFORMATION GWEN M. RA()UENZ WNW PO&K- WMESOTG My Comm'ssW fxµra JM 31:2010 lop I Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $22.00 per column inch Maximum mte allowed by law for the above matter ............ .................. $22.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $11.18 per column inch {CANNED 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-26 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, September 6, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition (6605 Horseshoe Curve) into three lots with Variances — Harvieux Subdivision. Applicant: Ronald Harvieux. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Bob Generous, Senior Planner Email: b¢enerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on August 25, 2005) 0 • CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 05-26 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, August 8, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for a Metes and Bounds Subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition into two parcels. Applicant: Ronald Harvieux. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, Senior Planner Email: bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on July 21, 2005) 0 0 Applicant Info Invoices & Receipts 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.11 80 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 0 October 13, 2005 Ron Harvieux 6605 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, MN 55317 • Re: Return of Fees for Harvieux Addition - Planning Case #05-26 Dear Mr. Harvieux: Enclosed is a check in the amount of $200. This check represents the following: $100.00 Sign Escrow $100.00 Overpayment of Recording Fees If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Sincerely, Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation CITY OF CHANHASSEN Phone: 952.227 .1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 K T. Meuwissen Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning Secretary Planning & Enc. Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 cc: Bob Generous AICP. Senior Planner Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-26 ha ieux subdivisicn\sign escrow renes letter.cim Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us WAMEO The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Check Date: 10/13/2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD., P.O. BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1140 CITY OF a 8:�1'r�a rr�i f�,i ?e11 CHANHASSEN , ", mon PAY ^ ' TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS AND 00 C TO _0'hr�"�L ORDER ' V THE RON HARVIEUX OF 6605 HORSESHOE CURVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317 M&1 MARSHALL & ILSLEY '1i fel 1711�i91C 1_ , Check #: 125731 NO. 125731 ^_ ,r Check Date: 10/13/2005 Check #: 125731 AMOUNT $200.00 Ii'i25731ii' 1:0910011571: 00257r11773121i' i • NO. 125731 Vendor: RONHAR RON HARVIEUX Invoice # Invoice Date Description Distribution Amount DW6439 10/10/2005 REFUND -RECORDING FEES/SIGN ESC 200.00 Check Amt Total: Check Date: 10/13/2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD., P.O. BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1140 CITY OF a 8:�1'r�a rr�i f�,i ?e11 CHANHASSEN , ", mon PAY ^ ' TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS AND 00 C TO _0'hr�"�L ORDER ' V THE RON HARVIEUX OF 6605 HORSESHOE CURVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317 M&1 MARSHALL & ILSLEY '1i fel 1711�i91C 1_ , Check #: 125731 NO. 125731 ^_ ,r Check Date: 10/13/2005 Check #: 125731 AMOUNT $200.00 Ii'i25731ii' 1:0910011571: 00257r11773121i' 0 0 DEMARS- GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 HARBOR LANE NO., SUITE I 11 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 Phone 763-559-0908 Fax 763-559-0479 TABULATIONS HARVIEUX ADDITION TREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONS LOT 1 AND 2 AREA = 39,404SQ. FT. BASELINE CANOPY COVER AREA = 35,318 SQ. FT. NON -CANOPY COVER AREA = 1,750 SQ. FT. CANOPY AREA TO BE REMOVED = 3,600 SQ. FT. CANOPY AREA TO REMAIN = 31,718 SQ. FT. (90% OF SITE) LOT 3 AREA = 47,087 SQ. FT. BASELINE CANOPY COVER AREA = 30,215 SO. FT. NON—CANOPY COVER AREA = 16,402 SQ. FT. CANOPY AREA TO BE REMOVED = 0 SQ. FT. CANOPY AREA TO REMAIN = 30,215 SQ. FT. (100% OF SITE) AREAS Site — 86,491 Square Feet/1.99 Acres Lot 1 — 15,064 Square Feet Lot 2 — 24,340 Square Feet (gross area) Lot 2 — 18,800 Square Feet (net area) Lot 3 — 47,087 Square Feet CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED SEP 1 2 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT SCANNEY 0 DEMARS- GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. Phone 763-559-0908 Fax 763-559-0479 Lot 2, Block 1, in said SATHRE ADDITION and 0 3030 HARBOR LANE NO., SUITE 111 PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 That part of Horseshoe Curve, originally dedicated in the record plat of SATHRE ADDITION and now to be vacated which lies easterly of a line described as follows: Comencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, in said SATHRE ADDITION; thence southerly, a distance of 84.82 feet, along the westerly line of said Lot 2, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southerly, tangent to the curve on said westerly line, a distance of 53.28 feet; thence southerly, on a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 150.04 feet, to the west line of said Horseshoe Curve. CITVOFCHANHASSEN RECEIVED SEP 1 2 2005 WN PLANNING DEPT SCANNED 0 i 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED SEP 1 2 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT i. II _J c� �2 a; i 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED SEP 1 2 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT CITY OF CHANHASSEN • 7700,MARKET BLVD • CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: PUBLIC Date: 08/30/2005 Time: 9:19am Receipt Number: EE / 6595 Clerk: BETTY GIS FEES ITEM REFERENCE ------------------------------------------- AMOUNT GIS GIS GIS LIST 75 00 --------------- Total: 75.00 CREDT 75.00 --------------- Change: 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! •• cic Z- 2 G SCANNED City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 MYOF (952) 227-1100 MMSEN To: Ron Harvieux 6605 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ship To: 00 Invoice SALESPERSON DATE TERMS KTM 8/25/05 upon receipt QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 25 Property Owners List within 500' of 6605 Horseshoe Curve (25 labels) $3.00 $75.00 TOTAL DUE $75.00 Make all checks payable to: City of Chanhassen Please write the following code on your check: Planning Case #05-26. If you have any questions concerning this invoice, call: (952)-227-1107. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! g.\plan\f r s\invoice-gisdm 00 PATRICIA A PAULS EMILY H JOHNSON TRUSTEE OF TRUST 11010 OREGON MRV 335 PLEASANT VIEW RD BLOOMINGTON MN 55438 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHRISTOPHER D ARNOLDY & KALLEY T YANTA MICHELE F ARNOLDY TRUSTEE OF TRUST 350 PLEASANT VIEW RD 365 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DONALD J & DARLENE M MILLER GARY W & MARY ANN MCCAULEY 395 PLEASANT VIEW RD 420 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CBR DEVELOPMENT LLC KELBIN ROBERT BAILEY 4550 WESTON LN N 6580 PLEASANT VIEW WAY PLYMOUTH MN 55446 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANN DANIELSON RAYMOND P & ALICIA L BROZOVICH 6607 HORSESHOE CRV 6609 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVEN M GULLICKSON & DAVID W SANTANA & JENNIFER H GULLICKSON DEBRA C SCHULTZ 6613 HORSESHOE CRV 6614 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROBERT L & ELVA HANSEN LADD R & SUSAN M CONRAD 6620 HORSESHOE CRV 6625 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANDREW H & KATRINA E CLEMENS CHARLES C & JANET C HURD 6691 HORSESHOE CRV 6695 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JOHN R & CAROL W HAMMETT BRACE D HELGESON 6697 HORSESHOE CRV 7820 TERREY PINE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 00 NICHOLAS J P PERKINS 339 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BASIL LAWRENCE TIVY 370 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES T & DIANE S LESTOR 429 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RONALD E & LEANNE HARVIEUX TRUSTEES OF TRUST 6605 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JOSEPH M & MARGERY M PFANKUCH 6611 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEPHEN J & JEANNIE L WANEK 6615 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RICHARD R & KATHLEEN E PECK 6690 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SANDRA LEE OLSON 6696 HORSESHOE CRV CHANHASSEN MN 55317 00 GI7y GF CIpMASSEM A rmwo DIEM t= iERQw # 0000136M *1 TOW I.G.: sa}ii72it3 a 29, 85 12:37:23 EISA on"WAMI IW #:1 SALE M# W:319252 BATM ON93 AMOUNT $75.00 taPPF� I ATS TD PAN ;BM Mk MW PC,10 Cfi�D Iw MOT (VOMW gEEMff IF LEGIT tT6J4FR) TOPiV,W M/BDTTWOTM M •• •• Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) Harvieux Subdivision Planning Case No. 05-26 6605 Horseshoe Curve City of Chanhassen Subject Site Lotus Lake CITY OF CHANHASSEN • 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: RONALD E. HARVIEUX Date: 08/09/2005 Time: 11:25am Receipt Number: DW / 6439 Clerk: DANIELLE 05-26 HARVIEUX ADDITION ITEM REFERENCE -------------------------------- DEVAP 05-26 HARVIEUX ADDITION USE & VARIANCE SIGN RENT RECORDING FEES SIGN ESCROW Total: Check 5118 Change: 500.00 75.00 100.00 100.00 775.00 775.00 --------------- 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! • SCANNED • 05-26 Harvieux Addition $300 Subdivision (3 lots) $200 Variance $175 Notification Sign 100' Recording Escrow $775 TOTAL FEES RECEIVED E -APPLICANT OWES $400 IN ADDITIONAL RECORDING FEES (Recording fees are $50 for Variance & $450 for minor subdivision) Paid $775 on 8/5/05 Check #5118 Ronald E. Harvieux SCANNED rnmr CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION App ioant Nppe and Address: V1 ez' Contact: <ejY Phone: 9-s`Z ,�7-f- ax: Email:Z_l Er✓ie i�c (P fdrt7,6.1k. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development` Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review* Subdivision' '306 Planning Case No. b 5 _alo CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED AUG 5 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Owner N e and Address: 'a�� Phone: Fax: Email: Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements n Variance 2-00 Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign*` - $75 + $100 Damage Deposit r?� X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost*** /a o $50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $Lj An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81h" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital cop v in TIFF -Group 4 ('.tif) format. " Applicant to obtain notification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with she plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED • �► PROJECT NAME: / /7fell, LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: G-0 2 '&/0- ill�e V a C1)Q-)/' l? TOTAL ACREAGE: C- C�eS WETLANDS PRESENT: YES NO PRESENT ZONING: S� REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: �_S/�"G'f///7�/ /a& / REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: n !� This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to h the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of proce my knowledge. , Date Date Glplan\fonns\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 4/05 Ll F�d�1 0 CITY OF RECEIVED SSEN AUG 5 2005 CHMHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Ph. (612) 339-2991 1128 Harmon Place Suite 20 Minneapolis mH 55403 0 0 NO. 124869 Vendor: RONHAR RON HARVIEUX Invoice# Invoice Date Description Distribution Amount DW6321 07/11/2005 RETURN SUBDIVISION FEES 525.00 Check Date: 07121/2005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD.. P.O. BOX 147 CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 (952) 227-1140 CITY OF CHONSEN PAY FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY—FIVE DOLLARS AND 00 M&I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK 17-115.'910 Check Amt Total: Check #: 124869 NO. 124869 Check Date: 07/21/2005 Check #: 124869 AMOUNT TO THETHE RON HARVIEUX ORDER 6605 HORSESHOE CURVE OF CHANHASSEN MN 55317 $525.00 II•L24a690 ii:09LOOLL57l: 00254rr,773L21I0 Vendor: RONHAR RON HARVIEUX NO. 12 4 U2 Invoice # Invoice Date Description Distribution DW6321 07/11/2005 RETURN SUBDIVISION FEES 525.00 Check Amt Total: OCANNEO Date: 07/21/2005 Check#: 124869 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 770(T MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: RONALD HARVIEUX Date: 07/11/2005 Time: 8:49am Receipt Number: DW / 6321 Clerk: DANIELLE 05-26 HARVIEUX SUBDIVISION ITEM REFERENCE AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- DEVAP 05-26 HARVIEUX SUBDIVISION USE & VARIANCE 300.00 SIGN RENT 75.00 RECORDING FEES 50.00 SIGN ESCROW 100.00 --------------- Total: 525.00 Check 5103 525.00 --------------- Change: 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! vvA -,10)5- ( 15 2s-# C�) w Aff C-cz i--+� A SCANNED *DETAIL W/GL DIST RECEIPT REPORT • FROM 00/00/0000 TO 07/18/2005 City of Chanhassen __________________________________________________________________________________________. Receipt t Drawer Post Date User Name Notes Customer Name ____________________________________________________________________________________________. 6321 DW 07/11/2005 DANIELLE 05-26 HARVIEUR SUBDIVISION RONALD HARVIEUR Date: 07/18/05 Time: 12:45pm ________ pa9e_________1 Change Receipt Total Stat ------------------------------ 0.00 ____________________________0.00 525.00 W Receipt Type: DEVAP : 05-26 HARVIEUR SUBDMSION Line Amount GL Note: USE & VARIANCE GL Number: 101-1420-3602 Bank Code: CHA Amount: GL Note: SIGN RENT GL Number: 400-0000-3809 Bank Code: CRA Amount: GL Note: RECORDING PEES GL Number: 101-1420-3605 Bank Code: CHA Amount: GL Note: SIGN ESCROW GL Number: 815-8204-2024 Bank Code: CHA Amount: Receipt Total Tender Information: Amount Code Description Reference 525.00 R Check 5103 -------------- 525.00 Total Tendered 0.00 Change -------------- 525.00 Receipt Total --------------------------- Cash Drawer DW Subtotal: 525.00 300.00 75.00 50.00 100.00 525.00 525.00 Grand Total (excl. voids): 525.00 CITY OF CHANHASSEN • 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: RONALD HARVIEUX Date: 07/11/2005 Time: 8:49am Receipt Number: DW / 6321 Clerk: DANIELLE 05-26 HARVIEUX SUBDIVISION ITEM REFERENCE ------------------------------------------- AMOUNT DEVAP 05-26 HARVIEUX SUBDIVISION USE & VARIANCE 300.00 SIGN RENT 75.00 RECORDING FEES 50.00 SIGN ESCROW 100.00 --------------- Total: 525.00 Check 5103 525.00 --------------- Change: 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! i 05-26 Harvieux Subdivision $300 Metes & Bounds Subdivision $175 Notification Sign 50 Recording Escrow $525 TOTAL FEES Paid $525 on 7/8/05 Check #5103 Ronald E. Harvieux SCANNED 0 0 Location Map Harvieux Subdivision Planning Case No. 05-26 6605 Horseshoe Curve City of Chanhassen oea/i easam Dyb View Road Pleasam View a O` if e° 4 e}No�bw Drive p_ o ISHollow o+ e o C`H + + o 4 � m E Je ox o n 3� Fenlall Goo u 3 m m 4 ray O+ U m Subject Site Lotus Lake n 0 oe PLEASE PRINT • • Planning Case No. DS alp CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147CITY OF CHAtIHASSEN Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227-1100 RECEIVED .Illi 0 8 2005 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CHANHASSEt/ PLANNING DEPT Owner Name and Address: "001%1 t / • r / /C'Contact: • f 'b ts'Phone: Fax: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development' Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review �( Site Plan Review' I� Subdivision` 7 Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign" - $75 +$100 Damage Deposit __75 X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost"' "5 )CUP/SPR/VAC/VAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds 50 Minor SUB -�;_ o TOTAL FEE $ SZSS An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. l� 11 Twenfq• (26) full-size folded copies of the plans -must be submitted, including �n 8'/V X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital coot/ in TIFF -Group 4 t`.tif) format. //�� Applicant to obtain notification sign from City of Chan Public Works at 1591 Park goad and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. SCANNED NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT N LOCATION: 0 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TOTAL ACREAGE: /I % � fT/ /P'S WETLANDS PRESENT: YES NO PRESENT ZONING: �WS 1:� REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: O C -V- S 1 Q' "-I AX — REASON FOR REQUEST: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowled ge Sig ature IDa z 6 "�� Si nAllwam Fee Ownef D to G:\plan\forrns\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 4/05 v �, A. THOMAS WURST, P.A. CURTIS A. PEARSON, P.A. JAMES D. LARSON. P.A. THOMAS F. UNDERWOOD, P.A. CRAIG M. MERTZ ROGER J. FELLOWS 0 LAW OFFICES 0 WORST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ • FA wTNEws HGF w<w o.c nworvssioNAi wssocunowa ONE FINANCIAL PLAZA, SUITE 1100 120 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS402-1803 Stephanie Young Carver County Title Examiner 3860 County Road 140 Chaska, MN 55318 Dear Ms. Young: March 18, 1993 Re: Danielson Property Carver Co. Certificate of Title #6942 TELEPHONE 16121 336 AZOO FAX NUMBER 16121 338-2623 I'm writing to you on behalf of John and Ann Danielson who are the registered owners of Lot 46, Pleasant View (Certificate of Title #6942). The 1992 Amendments to Minnesota Statute Section 508.71, Subdivision 2, appears to authorize the Examiner of Titles to issue a directive that a vacated street be added to a Certificate of Title. This letter is a request for the issuance of just such a directive. On February 12, 1990, the Chanhassen City Council adopted Resolution number 90-17, recorded on August 28, 1990, as Carver County Torrens Document number T-66231. That Resolution vacates a portion of Baldur Avenue in the plat of Pleasant View. On July 27, 1992, the Chanhassen City Council adopted Resolution 92-84, recorded January 6, 1993, as Carver County Torrens document number 76003. That Resolution vacates a portion of the street known as Horseshoe Curve also in the plat of Pleasant View. For your convenience I enclose a copy of the two resolutions. The vacated portions of Baldur Avenue and the vacated portions of Horseshoe Curve both abut my client's property. It is my understanding that the easterly line of Baldur Avenue is also of the easterly line of the plat of Pleasant View. The land to the immediate east of my client's property is a Ronald Harvieux property (Lot 2, Block 1, Sathre Addition). I enclose a photocopy of a portion of the plat of the Sathre Addition. A drawing upon that copy depicts both Baldur Avenue and the portions of Horseshoe Curve, vacated by the Chanhassen City Council. SCANNED 0 WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD 6 MERTZ Stephanie Young March 18, 1993 Page 2 On behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Danielson I request that you issue a directive transferring to the face of the DanielsonsI certificate both vacated Baldur Avenue and that portion of Horseshoe Curve which is indicated in pink on the enclosed map. It is my understanding that the Harvieux property is abstract property, although I have not verified that fact. I am sending a copy of this letter to the Carver County Auditor as my notice to the auditor of this request. I am not representing Mr. Harvieux in connection with this request, however, I am sending Mr. Harvieux a copy of this letter because Mr. and Mrs. Danielson have asked me to inform Mr. Harvieux of this request. It is my understanding that in connection with this type of request, your fee as examiner of title is not passed through to the applicants. If my understanding is incorrect please so advise. Very truly yours, l Craig M. Mertz CMM/kh Enclosure cc: Ron Harvieux John and Ann Danielson Mark Lundgren - Carver County Auditor 0 0 CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) Be COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, duly appointed, qualified and acting Deputy Clerk for the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of Resolution No. 90-17 entitled "A Resolution Vacating Beldur Avenue' dated February 12, 1990 with the original copy, now on file in my office, and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof and as approved by the -City-Council. Witness my hand and official seal at Chanhassen, Minnesota, this 21st day of August , 1990 Kar J. E gel dtDe2uty Clerk Pala .—�— of VPago CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: February 12, 1990 RESOLUTION NO: 90-17 MOTION BY: Johnson SECONDED BY: Dimler A RESOLUTION VACATING BALDUR AVENUE WHEREAS, a petition was received for the vacation of Baldur Avenue as described in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said petition on February 12, 1990; and WHEREAS, said public hearing was preceded by two weeks published and posted notice as required by Section 412.851 of Minnesota Statutes; and WHEREAS, there is no public interest to be served by the con- tinued public ownership of that portion of the above described right-of-way and easement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen that any and all of the above described road- way easement as described in Exhibit A is hereby vacated con- tingent upon the following: 1. A sanitary sewer easement should be retained/conveyed to the City over the portion of the existing sanitary sewer line. 2. No 'tree removal shall be permitted on Baldur Avenue. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 12th day of February , 1990. ATTEST: Don Ashworth, City Manager Donald C miel, yor YES NO ABSENT Chmiel None None Boyt Johnson Workman Dimler pa'j-.) � oT Papas EXHIBIT A BTREET VACATION BALDUR AVENUE - PLEASANT VIEW ADDITION That part of Saldur Avenue lying southerly of the northeasterly extension of the northerly line of Lot 46, all in Pleasant View Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. c par PMe � of PspM w • 0 City of Chanhassen Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota DATE: July 27. 1992 RESOLUTION NO: 92-84 MOTION BY: Workman SECONDED BY: Wing A RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF HILLSIDE AVENUE, HORSESHOE CURVE AND BALDER AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 5 412.851 the Chanhassen City Council has conducted a hearing preceded by two (2) weeks published and posted notice to consider the vacation of a portion of Hillside Avenue, Horseshoe Curve and Balder Avenue as described on the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the portion of Hillside Avenue, Horseshoe Curve and Balder Avenue proposed to be vacated does not continue to serve as public right-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen: 1. The above described easement is hereby vacated. However, there is reserved by the city, an easement for utility and drainage purposes over, across, on, under and through said vacation. 2. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor and County Recorder. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 27th day of July, 1992. ATTEST: 7 _Z Don Ashworth, CiEy Clerk/Manager Donald J ayor YES Chmiel Mason Dimler _ Wing Workman NO ABSENT None None DESCRIPTION FOR: I SIR• RONALD E. HARVIEUX Prepared By: 8CHOELL 8 MADSON, INC. /11 YIM1ll1 • 1U11Y1i0111 II�YYU1 _ a 1. TII TINY • 1M ri110MY 11TAI 1111 11.19 10191 VAT19L 91Y9. M YY9TOYl�. 91Y, 911.1 1 Illtl 911-1199 1�1t 911.9111 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION FOR VACATION PNS That part of Hillside Avenue (now known as Horseshoe Curve), originally 13 dedicated in the record plat of *PLEASANT VIEW and now to be vacated, which lies easterly and southeasterly of a line 30.00 feet easterly and southeasterly of the easterly and southeasterly line of Lot 2, Block 1, STEVENS ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of Horseshoe Curve, originally dedicated in the record plat of SATHRE ADDITION and now to be vacated which lies easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, in said SATHRE ADDITION; thence southerly, a distance of 84.82 feet, along the westerly line of said Lot 2, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southerly, tangent to the curve on said westerly line, a distance of 53.28 feet; thence southerly, on a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 150.04 feet, to the west line of said Horseshoe Curve. Date: September 30, 1992 Alt� S6 Theodore D. Kemna Land Surveyor MN Lic. No. 17006 9NOI ) snio-i v"D Oo Nor k 44 r1b Q 'k 0 Plans , 0. PL Variable 9' u i_ Wye Plugged End 1/8 Bend a' e" PVC SDR -26 Pipe Min, Slope 1/4" Per Fool J 2"x2" Marker 1/2 Pipe Diameter Min, See Note 2. Sanitary Sewer Gravity Main SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL Services to be Used in Conjunction with Plastic Pipe Sewer Main for Depths of Cover with Less Than 16 Feel. NOTES: I. Solvent Weld all Joints. (Non Goskeled) 2. When Sanitary Sewer Service is not Accompanied by o Water Service In the Some Trench, Install a 6' Heavy Metal Fence Post Next to 2 x 2 Marker and Point Top 6" of Poet Florescent Green. 3, Cleanout Reyulred on Private Properly It Distance from Main to House Exceeds 90 Feet. 4. All pipe shall be bedded on granular borrow 314A or course filter ag9regala (314911). CITY OF TYPICAL SANITARY CHANHASSEN SEWER SERVICE REvlsco: 2-es1-04 Dorf: 7. _ 1) / PLATE No.: 2001 rIL NAME: 1 Note: Sill fence per MNDOT specifications, source 2000, machine sliced woven monofilament, 36"wide fastened steel T -Posts with 3(501b) tens strength plastic zip lies per T -Post. (Machine sliced) T Posts 24" in ground lies Mb. a.ylh e1 en Ince .6,dneol. Note: Type 2 sill fence is the some as type I with hay bales installed as per detail Type 2 to be used to protect all wetlands. Zip Ties Hoy or Strew Bale, iw alMN YMM Iwx'X1.'eb.. ynna M ,war.... v4 W".. 1. M IM I. . w.by.ld4 YY.1I. CITY OF SILT CHANHASSEN FENCE REVISED: 2-9J, I -a2. bW. 1.9. DME: 2 97 PwE N0: 5300 11LE NAVE: PL CL PL 2'v' 25' 15.5' to Back 15.5' to Back Wear Course to be 1/2" e Above a3°Q Edge of Gulley ,n e 3.OR 2.OR i 40 C.ag �a4. 1 1.5 : 1 4" Topsail, Seed 1 1/2"-MNDOT 2350 L /WE35030B do Mulch or Sod. Surmountable Tock Coat - 2357 Concrete Curb 2"-MNDOi 2350 LVNW350308 12" -Close 5 Aggregate Base, 100% Crushed 24" MNOOT 3149.2B Select Granular Borrow (See Note 7) NOTES 1. Right -of -Way Required - 50'. 2. Maximum street grade 7.0%. 3. Minimum street grade 0.758. 4. Ala" Topsoil placed in disturbed areae. 5. 2 Rolls sad behind curb. 6. The bituminous wearing surface shall be placed the next construction season following placement of the bituminous base. 7. A teal roll of the prepared subgrade shall be performed by the owner In the presence of a city Inspector. The city hos the authority to require additional subgrade correction based on the lest roll. CITY OF TYPICAL �� KJ CHANHASSEN RES STREEITDENTIAL SECTION REVISED.2-97 . 2-01. I -U3 1-05 DATE / 2-97 "LME No.: 5200 PILE NAMC31 O� O ooOoO FILTER FABRIC O 6" MINIMUM DEPTH �., V 2" WASHED ROCK�'4r o0' <Ftic � BOSH 18" MINIMUM CUT OFF BERM 2d MINIMUM TO MINIMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE NOTE: FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER ROCK TO STOP MUD MIGRATION THROUGH ROCK. CITY OF ROCK rr CHANHASSEN CONSTRUCTIONN TRAN REVISED: 1-etl unn:- 2-97 P1AIE NO.: 5301 FILE NAME: 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT HARVIEUX ADDITION SHEET 2 OF 2 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me DEMARS—GABRIEL or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land LAND SURVEYORS, INC. Surveyor under the L si the ate of M' nesota. 3030 Harbor Lane No. G Plymouth, MN 55447 David E. Crook Pone:763 559-0908 Fox :((763) 559-0479 Date: 9-09-05 Minn. Reg. No. 22414 DETAIL PLATES LOTUS.DWG File No. 12454 Book—Page RON HARVIEUX 6605 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, Minnesota Scale I "=30' SCANNED �P /0 CITY OFCHANHASSEN I've%� RECEIVED JUL 0 8 2005 TREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONS PARCEL A AREA - 37,068 SO. FT. CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT BASELINE CANOPY COVER AREA - 35,318 SO. FT. NON -CANOPY COVER AREA - 1,750 SO. FT. CANOPY8Oor 7 CANOPYAREA TO REMAIN- 31, 0 50. FL (90R OF SITE) Gorey. I I ' PARCEL B AREA we 46,617 S0. Ff. BASELINE CANOPY COVER AREA we 30,215 SO. FT. NON -CANOPY COVEN AREA - 18,402 SO. Fl. CANOPY AREA O BE REMOVED se 0 50. FT. CANOPY AREA TO REMAIN - 30,215 SO. FI: (IOOX OF SITE) 1t. 11 / Ito I ii oek� \ O \ \ \ I I 1 i1,\ ,�V�\ It ll�l / / 1 1\\ \8 MF I -��( \ \ 30\ One aeiei '/ .M ,.p \m to \O" r \ N / \\ ,� "'�° \ \ \ aro• fap.I �\ I i II 14 \ 11 (958) II I 2 I IIII `, I / 1 pO �\ 30 \\ 37.08B B9UGl'� PCe�\ \ I //TREES ]f1 flt RE µwysu I ,la" 1 I II I I / M�so [�� I o 0• 10\ (\/\\ \yo•1ok�// I ✓ I �1�, �''\ I / "'Y101R (�5a) / /12 k 1` b 1 5/ \� \\ \\ \ \\\\\\ 1( fro j w _4n.4 l / / //11 vir /i Il�lsl I "new __ L`Jj UVJ / ',./ 1.. fair ��Q�1:28" A / �DVBV340/.' u' / /ro• �✓an/ " p°pr� I 'll 11 _ _ / / I ✓ � !o \ o _ / •�^' / / r/apa9ed 4.f..onp 1 fee an ' I l \ ✓O "'Al &he \�y ` ` J la b9A — ouOJi di filen lintl I � ' I _ I \ �•Q `.( 'v `\ "tea — _ _ moi./rii an Pi. If Sipes, / _I/ �pw // I 1 \ \\� \\••Nwp��L _�e��_- Sled i T� I I Ir �� / / � / •Aa• aoi ,off � � / l — — I I I I I D Z7 GARAGE /A / / It I ROUSE AREAS Site - 63,685 Square FeeVI.92 Acres Parcel A - 37,068 Square Feet Parcel B - 46,617 Square Feat 19 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 2, Block I, WHRE AOOTION f X /�<`�� / � /ul➢�/�/�/////ate/ N PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS PARCEL A Thal part of Lot 2. Block 1, WHRE ADDITION, lying "artfully of the following eescrihed line: y �/ / \/ / lY,"Y>• no9inning co o point on the easterly line of said tot 2. minutes feet court of the \� / k '�� lirfhamt comer thence Not Mince North 4 ,nut ea 0 mmuda a seconds West " 13756 faeb Mince North id degrees 5. minutes there eecanri West IJ1.58 feel to Me foulhweslerly line o/ veld Let 2 and said line Ibre terminating. ,. \ v — PARCEL B That port of Lot 2, Week 1, SATHRE ADDITION, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the easterly line of sold Lot 2, 97.62 feet south of the northeast comer thereof; thence North 89 degrees 39 minutes 00 second. West 137.56 fweF thence North 79 degrees 54 mrm.tes 28 .stands West 137.56 feel to the southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there farminafing. 30 0 30 60 90 06_1 0�_— Scale 1" = 30' LOTUS.UWD )EMARS—CABRIEL or I h."by i,ed)(y that this surve Inn o report was ' I' p p`ew'ee by Ella No. PREPARED FOR: D SURVEYORSINC or under my direct supervision anJ Eliot en am a duly Registered Land Sann,,ror 9mtr the Lowa of the smm of NMneeala. 12151 PROPOSED PROPERTY TION HARVIEU.Y 's° 70 Harbor Lane No. ,mouth, MN 55447 763) 559-0908 -- DIVISION 6605 Horseshoe Curve David E Crook rare: 'r: (763) 559-0479 Scab Chanhassen, Minnesota Date: Minn. Reg. No. day 7 2005 22414 1'-30' SCANNED PROPOSED HARDCOVER Hardcover Lot 1 House/Gar 2560 Sq.Ft. Drive BOB Sa.rf. Total Hardcover 3368 Sq.FE Lot Area 15152 Sq.Ft. X of Hardcover w 22.2% 'Pad' Area - J660 Sq.Ft. Hardcover Lot 2 (Net House/Gar 2BI Net Areo 16442 Sq.Ft. X of Hardcover m 27.7% Pad' Area . 7960 Sq.FI. Hardcover Lot 2 (Gross Areo) Nome/Gar 2810 Sq.Ft. Dnve 3066 Sq.Ft. Total Hardcover 5876 Sq.Ft. Net Area 23975 54.ft. X of Hardcover - 24.5% distance of 53.28 feel; thence southerry, on a langenlial curve concave to the west having o radius of 150.04 tool, to the west line of said Horseshoe Curve, AREAS Site - 86.491 Square Feet/1.99 Acres Int 1 - 1.5, 157 5qunre Feel Lot 2 - 23.975 Square Feet (groes area) Lot 2 - 18,442 Square Feel (net arca) \ 1 1 lot J - 47,764 Square Feel I 1 I I 1 II �Irr�, I I 12-1 It ' r / DENOTES POSSIBLE I ra{ 11 111 I I / BUILDING CONMURATION ,11 �OOI I I I c 1 I� LGI I I I /yam I Ix A/ 1 �at Aefnc nl trou°a T-1 r I�Sr �14 I I ' If DBMARS—CABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lane No. hvAiH44 1A01j" IUHS sr . sl ,, now nrnre suaso s' am PROPERTY UESCRIPTION v AREA - 59,921 SO. ll. Int 2, Black 1, SATHRE ADDIDON DENOTES TRF! TO UL RLMOM) DASLLINI CARUI', LOt'LR AREA = J5,3I41 50. R. 7421 Sq.Ftos AND Lol Arca NON -CANOPY COVER ARCA = 1,750 SO, Fr. X of Hardcover = 15.7X 117115 10 PE REMOVED CANOF'1' ARCA IO RE REMOVED = 7,600 50. R rwos. rv,n Thal art of Horseshoe Lurve, originally dedicated in the and /1-14"_ T.LM CANOPY AREA FO REAMIN - 71,718 SO. FT. (90% OF SITE) record plat of SATHRE ADDITION now to be vacated N2-17 ELM LOT J AREA = 46,570 50. FT. which lifts easterly of a line described as follows: 4'3-17" FLM RA;FIINF CANOPY COVER AREA - 3(1.21.5 50, FT. Commencing of the northwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1. 14- 14" :'At,in NUN-G'ANL69' L%NVEI! ANI16,402 SU. f I. said SATHRE ADDITION; thence southerly, a distance of / CANOPY AREA TO BE REMOVED - 0 SO. FT 84.87 feet, along the westerly line of said Lot 2, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence GANOPIAREA 10 REMAIN = JO,215 SO. FT. (100% OF SITE) southerly, tangent to the curve on sold westerly line, o distance of 53.28 feel; thence southerry, on a langenlial curve concave to the west having o radius of 150.04 tool, to the west line of said Horseshoe Curve, AREAS Site - 86.491 Square Feet/1.99 Acres Int 1 - 1.5, 157 5qunre Feel Lot 2 - 23.975 Square Feet (groes area) Lot 2 - 18,442 Square Feel (net arca) \ 1 1 lot J - 47,764 Square Feel I 1 I I 1 II �Irr�, I I 12-1 It ' r / DENOTES POSSIBLE I ra{ 11 111 I I / BUILDING CONMURATION ,11 �OOI I I I c 1 I� LGI I I I /yam I Ix A/ 1 �at Aefnc nl trou°a T-1 r I�Sr �14 I I ' If DBMARS—CABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lane No. 1 Mreby CMify IMI this surrey, alert ar resod was DIM°red Ire aw visor my dkeal ! lea nnn that I am a duy Reable,lA Lona sw"°^" waNt '"• t"/�jI°f '^^•'°'^. a sr . sl ,, now nrnre suaso s' am Existing Hardcover Lof J v House/Gar 2800 Sq.FLDrive HARVIEUX ADDITION seam 4621 SgLFt.Total e-011 Hardcover 7421 Sq.Ftos Lol Arca 47764 Sq.Ft. X of Hardcover = 15.7X rwos. rv,n distance of 53.28 feel; thence southerry, on a langenlial curve concave to the west having o radius of 150.04 tool, to the west line of said Horseshoe Curve, AREAS Site - 86.491 Square Feet/1.99 Acres Int 1 - 1.5, 157 5qunre Feel Lot 2 - 23.975 Square Feet (groes area) Lot 2 - 18,442 Square Feel (net arca) \ 1 1 lot J - 47,764 Square Feel I 1 I I 1 II �Irr�, I I 12-1 It ' r / DENOTES POSSIBLE I ra{ 11 111 I I / BUILDING CONMURATION ,11 �OOI I I I c 1 I� LGI I I I /yam I Ix A/ 1 �at Aefnc nl trou°a T-1 r I�Sr �14 I I ' If DBMARS—CABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lane No. 1 Mreby CMify IMI this surrey, alert ar resod was DIM°red Ire aw visor my dkeal ! lea nnn that I am a duy Reable,lA Lona sw"°^" waNt '"• t"/�jI°f '^^•'°'^. a 11G N0' 12151 LOIUS.O6Cr PRELIMINARY PLAT Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 767 559-0906 Fos: 767 559-0479 David E. crook HARVIEUX ADDITION seam B_a._a5 nail: —. Minn, Rig. Na. _zz4u t'-sn' T / DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS r 1 5-1—I P- 5 10 5—j I — _ J Dramage and Utility easern.0 arc shown thus. Berg 5 fool N Nd0 adfamm9 lot IMM wrkn elh.low mdralad. and Is teal In wmlh odfakrine rlphl-°I-vaY Arm as sham an tha ".L NOTE: ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS ARE TO BE VACATED AND REDEDICATED IN THE FINAL PLAT OF HARMEUX ADDITION PREPARED FOR: RON HARVIEUX 6605 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, Minnesota CITY OF SSEN RECEIVED AUG 5 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEP'( 6CANNleo *11+OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED SEP 12 2005 CWHASSEN PLANNING DEPT TREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONS % j/� PROPERTY DESCRIPTION & 1+^ Lww LOT 1 AND 2 AREA = 39,404SO.. FT. Lot 2, Block 1, SATHRE ADDITION / DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED BASELINE CANOPY COVER AREA = 35,318 SO. FT AND NON -CANOPY COVER AREA - 1,750 SQ. FT. That port of Horseshoe Curve, originally dedicated in the TREES TO BE REMOVED CANOPY AREA TO BE REMOVED 3,600 50. FT. record plot of SATHRE ADDITION and now to be vacated y #1-14" ELM CANOPY AREA TO REMAIN = 31,718 $0. FT. (90% OF SITE) which lies easterly of a line described as follows: / g2-12" ELM #3-12" ELM LOT 3 AREA = 47,087 Sq. FT. C / Commencing at the northwest comer o/ Lot 2. Block 11* `1 BASELINE CANOPY COVER AREA = 16,215 SO. FT. rj'4-14" OAK 8 said foot, ala ADDITION; thence southerly, o distance of NON -CANOPY COVER AREA 16,402 50. Ff. 64.82 feet, in ng the westerly line o1 said Lot 2, n the CANOPY AREA TO BE REMOVED O 50. FT. point rl beginning of the line to be described; thence / I CANOPY AREA TO REMAIN = 30,215 S0. Ff. (100% OF SITE) southerly, tangent to the curve on said westerly line, o distance of 53.28 feet; thence southerly, on a tangential curve concave to the west having reius of 150.04 q I i I Gouge 1T n Telt, he We9f line Of a0id Horseshoeashoe GYNO. L.v I I AREAS I Site - 86.491 Square Feat/I.99 Acres Aapcent House Lot 1 - 15,064 Square Feet 1 / / � � Lot 2 - 24,340 Square Feet (gross area) +• , Lot 2 - 18.800 Square Feet (net area) Lot 3 - 47,087 Square Feet �(�r�'''�� % wh I N eB• \ \ I I I Ook 100, Y 5�� `o•mn �L^ >+Yza�ec�"�'\c+a qe� l I � \° •.`• 1R 1 \ _I�`"N�Ier q S 10^ f QD if \ ((1&� r��osc 1C ' {1r\•�C 1 I I e/ta'sonH "PAD' 'I I11^'1 1a 1 I ,,, •�''aenr; a s�iI G4RA6€=950.5'P; I I \� \ /\ GARAGE 956.215 �I lol rjaw�l 'f I 1 1 / DENOTES POSSIBLE l los• Ae V \TDF=9y4. .3p, I I �'46 \ �ILd+o0�6j / 1 ' / 4a�I I1b��yll 1 BUILDING CONFIGURATION I I / 30\ a• l/YrTOF?58.2`✓ l \ �o way 10 taw �> / / /%l z.31/V1eYfwR1 / 1 ice` I P I I c �b % 55 \ n� fiw / ( D / h1/S / INI I cvraq. 0� 4/ /io• MlowYa'/ 'Y" I I roe 11 \a — 1/,aaf�' a� I e dso 12' 1,4 06 �� ' 1& \ . .. .N .'. �.. a,� f • • .i Asn j / Aaiar.nt rwos.r ;75a�rM T H$i / l Ohl g \ \ \ o �.4�• uoA►25' wn / / Shed / in�i/�o�n°—� / /F � I I 1 11 T I I azTsrl'N.r,_ R vs / L.v i _ � I if \\ `\ \ — EXISTING / I / I / \ _ — _ — HOUSE u.e / I , I / `; (/6605 PROPOSED HARDCOVER Hardcover Lot 7 ilouse/Gor 2543 Sq.Fl. / \ `'— —'- — — — — ,L / - / / // Drive 825 Sg.Ft.7 �/ — 9 / / / _• / % / Total Hardcover 3368 Sq.Ft. _ \��•�rs / / — — — �' t Lot Area 13064 Sq.Ft. — — —ss0 of Hardcover = 22.4% 'Pod' Area a 3390 Sq.Ft. Hurdcuvcr Lot 2 (Net Area) \/ ( (// / / / / / / / — 910 ---9Z— House/Gar 2810 Sq.Ft. N -%• I / , / / —•�— i_�7r —� — Drive/wa/k/Patio 1600 So.Ft. Tocol Hardcover 4410 Sq.Ft. 1 ((( C.'w /\ I 1 I / / / / / b� ,��,yq- Net Area 16800 Sq.Ft. o' Xi" b of Hardcover - 23.51. "Pad" Area = 3960 Sq.Ft. /\ �� / , / / i / / / DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS Hardcover Lot 2 (Gress Area)" House/Gor 2610 Sq.Ft. / �/ A Drive/Walk/Patio 3250 Sq.Ft. Tocol Hardcover 6060 Sq.Ft. Gross Area 24340 Sq.Ft. / / // / / / L PLe % of Hardcover - 24.9% Existing Hardcover Lot 3 House/Car 2800 Sq.Ft. / Drive 4621 Sq.Ft. Total Hardcover 7421 Sq.Ft. Lot Area 47007 Sq.Ft. Z of Hardcover = 75.7% 9-12-05 DEMARS—GABRIEL AND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lane No. Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone:763 559-0908 Fax: 763 559-0479 ** SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR CITY OF CHANHASSEN DETAIL PLATES Drainage and Utillfy, easements ore shown thus: BcMg 5 het In width adpinNq lot lines, unless otherwise Indicated. and 10 feat in wkith odlowinq dghf-af-way 1Mee. w shown on the plat. NOTE: ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS ARE TO BE VACATED AND REDEDICATED /N THE FINAL PLAT OF HARVIEUX ADOPION SCANNED • PROPOSED HARDCOVER Hardcover Lot 1 House/cor 2560 Sq.l Lot Area 15152 Sq.Ft. X of Hadcover w 22.2X •Pqd• Arc° w 3660 Sq.FI. Hardcover Lot 2 (Net Area) House/Cor Drive 2810 Sq.Ft. 1566 Sq, t. Total Hardcover 4376 Sq.Ft. Net Area 18442 Sq - FI -X of Hardcover w 217X 'Pod' Ara. - J960 Sq.FI. Hardcover Lot 2 (Gross Are*) House/Cor 2610 Sq.Ft. Drive 3066 Sa.Ft. Total Mordcover 5876 Sort, Net Area 23975 Sq.A t. X of Hardcover - 24.5X Existing Hardcover Lot J House/Gor 2800 Sq.F1. Drive 4621 S¢R. Total Hardcover 7421 Sq.Ft. Lot Area 47J64 Sq.Ff. X of Hardcover - 15.7X Irl �irvA111%fJ I Ai' ,ui AilUH', PROPERTY VESCRIPRON 1✓�., Int I ANU 1 AREA - 39.921 50. n. I.nl 2, Block I, SATHRE ADDITION VENOIES Th'U IC UE hLUGVED I1A';L11OI CA -401'r (,,(All? AR[A - J5,318 50. FT. AND NON -CANOPY r,UVFR AREA 1,750 S0, FT. That pod o! Horseshoe Curve, originally dedicated in the TREES i'O RE RFMOVU) CANOP ARU TO RE REMOVED = 3,600 SO, TT. record plat of Horseshoe ATHRE ADDITION and now to be d infth 1I -I4" ELM CANOPY AREA 10 REMAIN Ji.71A S0. FT. (POR OF SITE) which ties easterly of a line described as follows: ed /2-I2'_ ELM LOT 3 AREA = 46,570 SO. FT. ,/.7-1? TIM Commencing of the northwest comer of Lot 2, Block 1, 4- 11" nA1 DAf4TNITIF)N CANOPY GOVFIx AREA - .70,71.5 S0. f1. ( in snit SA/HRE ADDITION; thenen soulhery, a distance of CANOPY AREA TO BFII? ITWAREIb,-002 SO. /l. 84.82 feet, along the westerly line of said Lot 2, to the / f,ANORY ARU 70 BE RF. MOVED - 0 50. FT. point of beginning of the line to be described; thence ! CANOPY AREA 10 RI MAIN 70,215 50. FE (IOOX OF SITE) southerly, tangent to the curve on said wealerly line, a / distance of 57.28 feet, thence southerly on a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 15°.04 / l wrnv I I feet. to the west line of said Horseshoe Curve. I AREAS Site - 85.491 Square Feet/1.99 Anes ( Aaiaa.al eauee I at 1 - I5,157 Squnrn F mf 1 lo! 2 - 27,975 Square Fee! (groan area) ' ! \ Eat 2 - 18.442 Square Feet (net area) Lef J - 17,761 Square Feet '�7 N 08• \ \\ \ 11 \I l 1 41 04 A, `& p °p .-.1R. - � \ 1 1 I I 1 I r — — — — — 1 ws iF. � �\s�v�'�.r maw I � o• �� \ I I I I/ ll� l e l I I ."ave\ ,•f ,t,A� `O o \ 16j0 "x:',��\ �^ c°f � • �F � "`\\°\\!°A�+wm\1 � a° � �I l�l�lIl is. *dal,1. = I .I lxlwrl� l l /) b [/'0 r� AcG .i •Iitil•hq III( i IT GA216):-95U.vr 'Oq I I \ I J \ F•ARA/%E 9.56.2 �``1t' 4(',-;��In1` I ! II DENOTES POSSIBLE \TOF-074.9 I I 1'pL yAa"1!"A�1/ I I I I I fAj I 1 I I I I / BUILDING CONFIGURATION e` rl 9911 / , I / 1,,[�....M///h��•��I 1 I I I / 2�'/(I �j I �ry 111 II \ \ I 7 �� \ I— 4•P / . /( /to- _j rn• J rsrk�v Ir-xve°w� I I I \� \ !a` --•-1—\ ((]] Ix�. Z••/ 5`x'1 J. wTi ,1 �IIG.,1��. R�/• l biocial H°oee Id' MM1\ IRIISYRILFaNI CMe / 711' b" � r It MA I I � p J / '�, \ � "• � �.pR. ]51 wn< `Jy� shed / ` I if rAMrlt \) I I EROSION CONTROL OF [AIM !Ie{NOM MM IM1C BLRwD 1• Ow EeoSgH commo, UEMARS-CABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 1 hereby cMilY thel this -0l , Cron ar reparl was prMared by me o, unser my dhecf . .on n mal 1 o nay aro+eM.ee tone sar"eA,r arxlr 1"' ° rib No. 17151 LOTUS.DBD � Harbor Lane No. PRELIMINARY PLAT °a° Plymouth, MN 9-09 Phone:(763) )559-0479 OaviO E. Croakne HARVIEUX ADDITION Snag. DOW 6-a1-O.S Mlnn. Hry, Nn. 77111 1'-.M1O' DRAINAGE AND DI UTILITY EASEMENTS 5 OmMoge and U1911y easement, are shown IN, Dehq 5 test M wMIM1 adbhn, fol knee, vnpv pfhm"M hdlcoll4 and 10 lest F width adNlnhp rAxhl-of-way (hes. m Down an the plot NOTE: ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS ARE TO BE VACATED AND REDEDICATED IN THE FN& MAT OF HARNEUX ADDITION PREPARED FOR: RON HARVIEUX 6605 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, Minnesota CITY OF CHANHASSE¢N RECEIVED AUG 5 2005 - - CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT aeANOeo o`Z� Ory TREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION /�? 014- elm L07 1 AND 2 AREA = 39,404SQ. FT. Lot 2, Block 1, SATHRE ADDITION t 4, DENOTES FREE TO BE REMOVED BASELINE CANOPY COVER AREA = 35,318 SQ. FT AND kNON-CANOPY COVER AREA = 1, 750 SO. FT. e That part of Horseshoe Curve, originally dedicated c the � TREES TO BE REMOVED CANOPY AREA TO BE REMOVED = 3,600 SQ. FT. e which lies easterly of O line described as follows: / #2-12" ELM LOT 3 AREA = 47,087 SQ. FT. #3-12" ELM / BASELINE CANOPY COVER AREA = 30,215 SQ. F7. Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 2, Block 1, �4- 14" OAK in said SATHRE ADDITION; thence southerly, a distance of T NON -CANOPY COVER AREA = 16,402 SQ. FT 84.82 feet, along the westerly line of said Lot 2, to the CANOPY AREA TO BE REMOVED = 0 SQ. FT. point of beginning of the line to be described; thence CANOPY AREA TO REMAIN = 30,215 SQ. FT. (1009 OF SITE) southerly, tangent to the curve on said westerly line, a 41 / distance of 53.28 feet; thence southerly, on a tangential ` curve concove to the west having a radius of 150.04 4y I n T ' feet, to the west line of said Horseshoe Curve. / L_v I AREAS Site - 86,491 Square Feet/1.99 Acres y \ _ Lot 1 - 15,064 Square Feet Lot 2 - 24,340 Square Feet (gross area) Lot 2 - 18,800 Square Feet (net area) 34" 00. Al Lot 3 - 47,087 Square Feet 66e .00 &34- Oak s^o \ Bj('��7Q�844� 00„ r 10 1\ 10' Elm O >g4rQ r"�b \ , 9r 411, \ � 1 �� Ta �^ ��GNT �ffi5• ' + Oak .e F TD R o 'a/ kk4/ a, ° t o \ JO 8" Oak N UNCf/giy a o', \% 10' Oak \ y Geo o \ '0" ex a wood "� e � 12" Call ap "PAD` \ ib• as q ` 2 946 DRfVE aPosEO s.s { GARAGE=950,5 ' 1 {GARAGE=956.251 1_ ` o,0a4 \II DENOTES POSSIBLE 5' � 10. a\1 TOF=954.5 � I ysa• 0) � t,95 � 91 to BUILDING CONFIGURATION i 1scc ii 14 Fi Sf 1U a _ I (>.L 2EIm !°" act 9 o" Oak \ TOF=958.25 n, 3 { f d 1 1 \ 10 Hlrkary 70" Oat ({ > 2 W I t 9r 1- ;?5 \ J' ` 2 `' OOakk, .OD A `) ro p50 CON 12" Elm 1 t 300at > `0 �5gb°'�/ 4•. bck �3 1 \ re 30 I bot 41, 0' Hicko 0 { 12" maple 1 I Y —ee I rn Sia - cool o 81.4 6, a; r� • 7 5.3 0 °. Asn ► 0 2" s., o O Ash 30" Pine 8: uopie C. CY / / s 49 - cil\ O Maple -25 Pine Shed '.¢e G Y^ • rn l `b / o �o No PN� s � _ EXISTING DRIVE ' i GARAGE / \ \ EXISTING HOUSE #6605 PROPOSED HARDCOVER Hardcover Lot 1 House/Gar 2543 Sq.Ft. \ i' Drive 825 Sq.Ft. \ CITY OF CHANHASSEN Total Hardcover 3368 Sq.Ft. �a'e T / F;y RECEIVED Lot Area 15064 Sq.Ft. \ �1( J'n % of Hardcover = 22.4% �or'a ` �, - - SEP 1 2 2005 "Pod" Area = 3390 Sq Ft. \ / w� tai / L CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Hardcover Lot 2 (Net Area) House/Gar 2810 Sq.Ft. Drive%Walk/Patio 1600 Sg•Ft6 \ C' 9 Total Hardcover 4410 Sq.Ft. C 1b16 - �' / � Net Area 18800 4l't. i ti r0'_� 00 O - i of Hardcover = 23.5% -�> Ee cL i Mint y �yg �- "Pod" Area = 3960 Sq Ff. \ ✓ tt V6 0 u= ! e DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS Hardcover Lot 2 (Gross Area) -a9 e House/Gar 2810 Sq.Ft. aµ4 e9 Drive/Walk/Patio 3250 Sq. Ft. \ /� o v0t 5 - - 5 Total Hardcover 6060 Sq Ft. o0 Gross Area 24340 Sq. Ft. v�R 5 0 % of Hardcover = 24.9% Existing Hardcover Lot 3 V House/Gar 2800 Sq. Ft. Drive 4621 Sq. Ft. Total Hardcover 7421 Sq. Ft. Lot Area 47087 Sq. Ft. Drainage and Utility easements ore shown thus: % of Hardcover = 15.7% Being 5 feet in width adjoining lot lines, unless ** SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR CITY otherwise indicated, and 10 feet in width adjoining right-of-way lines, as shown on the plot. OF CHANHASSEN DETAIL PLATES NOTE. ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS ARE TO BE VACATED AND 9-12-05 REDEDICATED IN THE FINAL PLAT OF HARVIEUX ADD177ON I herebycertify that this survey, ion or report was prepared b me File No. DEMARS—GABRIEL y y' p m p gi y PREPARED FOR: or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duty Registered Land 12454 LAND SURVEYORS, INC. Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota RON HARVIEUX (�,Q�� / a°°k-P°ge PRELIMINARY PLAT 3030 Harbor Lane No. a.� 6605 Horseshoe Curve Plymouth, ) 55409 David E. Crook Phone:(7 3 559-0908 HARVIEUX ADDITION Fax: 763 559-0479 scale Chanhassen, Minnesota Dote: 8-04-05 Minn. Reg. No. 22414 1"=30' $CANNED �" /� / a / TREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONS PARCEL A AREA = 37,068 SQ. FT. �l// / BASELINE CANOPY COVER AREA = 35,318 SQ, FT. NON -CANOPY COVER AREA = 7,750 SQ. FT. CANOPY AREA TO BE REMOVED = 3,600 SQ. FT. CANOPY AREA TO REMAIN = 31,718 SO. FT. (909 OF SITE) 4y / 11�T �\ PARCEL B AREA = 46,617 SQ. FT. BASELINE CANOPY COVER AREA = 30,215 SQ. FT. NON -CANOPY COVER AREA = 16,402 SQ. FT. CANOPY AREA TO BE REMOVED = 0 SQ. FT. CANOPY AREA TO REMAIN = 30,215 SQ. FT. (1009, OF SITE) / 3a' Oak \ r Q ,r4 )34" Oak \ �- \ '� �8 O \ 10" E1 ° �?�TFH r 1 Oi �9 \�74,�„ 74' Oak t�c 'af � 8. Oak It i m n a I O 4 ' A 50 n ,a• Oak .T .e h \ a N�RTTIFAST CO�IEN OF COT I. BL.00k r ,O` Oak �. Daildlnq envaape �� \ (O' BosswogdI ' T''..8,I10• Mope I �O. ( a' pARCI v� o; Zak 14" pak 1o'\Naple J A I (AIRAGE (958) 1` e t \ NOTE., NO Sl NIACANt 37,066 Square Feet TREES To of RErtoVEO to' Maple TOt o4k i iia' TO• Hickory 01 WALKOUT (950) I ~ _ 71' 6.k t0. Oak i �'� _ L buiidinq- . _e pt— v7" ilm. ` li' 06k o \ 30 _ _ .4' 400, m 4 •B f 2 Mapi kory 14 poplar t 107 79 �, _ N 89039'-00" W h n I, I proms w 4 a bounds divrtes Ond 950 _. '56 proposed metes and I r c s'vn I;ne . Y '2' oak bounds division tine.. 1, t O i70/12" an O 30' Pina 8• Mapie ,. O It �v Pine 0 Shed .. 1 Miople _T5 ;... AREAS Site - 83,685 Square Feet/1.92 Acres Parcel A - 37,068 Square Feet Parcel B - 46,617 Square Feet PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 2, Block 1, SATHRE ADOTION PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS O ,q CARACJS" 'L HOUSE - -4 e — c o 20 �O f -. .. _ 910 .I r Y -- �oo�s PARC B 46,617 Square Feet - - v i C 4 01 , 900 tv 89L, PARCEL A S° That part of Lot 2, Block 1, SATHRE ADDITION, lying northerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point or, the easterly line of said Lot 2. 97.82 feet south of the \ * YYY northeast corner thereof; thence North 89 degrees 39 minutes 00 seconds West 137.56 feet; thence North 79 degrees 54 minutes 28 seconds West 137.56 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating. PARCEL B That part of Lot 2, Block 1, SATHRE ADDITION, lying southerly of the following described tine: Beginning at a point on the easterly line of said Lot 2, 97.82 feet south of the northeast corner thereof, thence North 89 degrees 39 minutes 00 seconds West 137.56 feet; thence North 79 degrees 54 minutes 28 seconds West 137.56 feet to the southwesterly rine of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating. DEMARS—GABRIEL I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supernsjon and that I am a duty Registered Land LAND SURVEYORS, INC. SurveyUwUnder Law of the State of Minnesoto. 3030 Harbor Lane No. Plymouth, INN 55447 Dovid E. Crook Phone;(763) 559-0908 Fax: 763)) 559-0479 Duly 7, 2005 22414 Dote Minn. Reg. No. LOTUS.DWG File No. 12454 1 "=30' 100 11OtOo 30 PROPOSED PROPERTY DIVISION I r\ - L.',/ I _ 0 30 CITY OF RECEIVED SSEN ;JUL 0 8 2005 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT 60 90 Scale 1 " = 30' PREPARED FOR: RON HARVIEUX 6605 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, Minnesota 3 PARCEL A Y) TREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONS PARCEL A AREA = 37,058 SQ. FT. BASELINE CANOPY COVER AREA = 35,318 SQ. FT. NON—CANOPY COVER AREA = 1,750 SQ. FT. CANOPY AREA TO BE REMOVED = 3,600 SQ. FT. CANOPY AREA TO REMAIN = 31,718 SO. FT. (90% OF SITE) PARCEL B AREA = 46,617 SQ. FT. BASELINE CANOPY COVER AREA = 30,215 SO. FT. NON—CANOPY COVER AREA = 16,402 SQ. FT. CANOPY AREA TO BE REMOVED = 0 SQ. FT. CANOPY AREA TO REMAIN = 30,215 SQ. FT. (1007 OF SITE) 034 Oak \_ so r° i �}ti.e S `Es ONO Si F+vSTiHc \ 34" On. \- \ 1 \ `8" Oak ` / 10' Oak a, r¢{� q" b �NbRTr1EA5i CORNER OF LO' 2. BLOCK , \ ' 10 .Oak l,ti f) buidrnq er;vel4Pe �5t,!' ` " i „p> 8as9wo \ PA A 4 Oak 25' S \ PARCEL (958) 3, -I lO CS 10�HaPle I - I� sa \ 37,068 Square Feet I NOTEBE NO SIaNIAOANT la" rm O _ TREES TO RCMOYED • 11 10 0" 'k�1 > \ \010' Oak- 1 ,� a Q 10' Nick ory I WALKOUT (950) I ' ^` ^'�0 Oak ,2" Oak o building envelope— �,^ ,arm I ,4. Oak 1 ` o 01- '0 0 � `z \ -- -- -- -- J _- n7go u pQ. 54.8•• �� 12" May ..., l" kor Y .4• popla, 107.7 N 69w39'00" w 111 11 and 95,0 n 1 7.56 proposed metes and It I n o qq sio0 lane '2' Jbk bounds division line ! I10' ~ t Ash o ^ _ ..,• ash � ow AREAS Site — 83,685 Square Feet/1.92 Acres Parcel A — 37,068 Square Feet Parcel B — 46,617 Square Feet PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 2, Block 1, SATHRE ADDITION PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS \ < ,53' Vine / A" Volpe t7� MaP/e 25' Pine S�e•d �,¢e '. That part of Lot 2, Block 1, SATHRE ADDITION, lying northerly of the following \ described line: Beginning at a point on the easterly line of said Lot 2, 97 82 feet south of the northeast corner thereof, thence North 89 degrees 39 minutes 00 seconds West 137.56 feet; thence North 79 degrees 54 minutes 28 seconds West 137.56 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating PARCEL B That part of Lot 2, Block 1, SATHRE ADDITION, lying southerly of the following described Iine: Beginning at a point on the easterly line of said Lot 2, 97.82 feet south of the northeast corner thereof; thence North 89 degrees 39 minutes 00 seconds West 137.56 feet; thence North 79 degrees 54 minutes 28 seconds West 1.3756 feet to the southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating. DEMARS—GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lane No, Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: 763 559-0908 Fax: 763) 559-0479 i hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyjj.Lnderj&j-, Lawj of thq State of Minnesota David E. Crook Date: July 7, 2005 Minn. Reg. No. 22414 GARAGE IZ HOUSF. o ca iV ,t 1 o PARCEL B 970 46,619 Square Feet RECEIVED SEIV 0 JUL 0 8 2005 CHANHASSEN PLgNNINC 0 t � ERT LOTUS.DWG File No. 12454 1"=30 30 PROPOSED PROPERTY DIVISION 0 30 Scale I" — 30' PREPARED FOR: RON HARVIEUX 6605 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, Minnesota y �,a , A. 'J'", , ADDITION <4 O C �� CIryRECEIVED SSEN dR 313 2'29" SEP 1 2 2005 1 •20 CHANHASSEN CHANH ASSENPtANNINGDEPT \ d 170' .fir cB�4900,. QO (;) `�/ 930,17 B3e1 \ 71-1 �o 1 CID L — ` VI r< � 00 4� ti 1 I \ � / C \\ I co 020,-� ` I\ � C ,� ;5o i I \,\ \o i> I CIO 81.40 i 49 S 88-19'16" W 23 � 01, / I v ,I i l\' 7 oDenotes 1, SATHRE ADDITION found iron pipe o Denotes 1/2 - inch x 14 inch iron pipe That part of marked by License No. 22414 be vacated which lies easterly of a line described The EAST tine of Outlot A. Sothre Addition Addition has an assumed bearing of North 08 degrees 17 minutes 00 seconds West. curve on said westerly line, a distance of 53.28 Drainage and utility easements shown thus: Being 5 feet in width and adjoining lot lines, unless otherwise indicated on plat, and being 10 feet in width and adjoining right-of-way lines, unless otherwise indicated on plat. O; ce, BLOCS 1 • V J tl // NN 0 / Ue / T .55 3�0 ,J 5 166 /yNe EVol E , utw i , \ / jO,GE i 30 0 60 90 120 Scale in Feet 7 � O PLAT FILE NO C.R. DOC. NO. KNOWN BY ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: Ronald E Harvieux and Leanne Harvieux, husband and wife, fee owners of the following described property: Lot 2, Block 1, SATHRE ADDITION AND That part of Horseshoe Curve, originally dedicated in the record plat of SATHRE ADDITION and now to be vacated which lies easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the northwest comer of Lot 2, Block i, in said SATHRE ADDITION; thence southerly, a distance of 84.82 feet, along the westerly line of said Lot 2, to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southerly, tangent to the curve on said westerly line, a distance of 53.28 feet; thence southerly, on a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 150.04 feet, to the west line of said Horseshoe Curve. Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as HARVIEUX ADDITION, and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public use forever the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on the plat. In witness whereof said Ronald E. Harvieux and Leanne Harvieux, husband and wife, have hereunto set theinccnds this day of SIGNED: Ronald E. Harvieux Leanne Harvieux STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of husband and wife. 20 20 by Ronald E. Harvieux and Leanne Harvieux, Notary Public Hennepin County, Minnesota My Commission expires 1 hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as HARVIEUX ADDITION; that this plat is a correct representation of the survey, that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments have been correctly placed in the ground as shown or will be placed as required by the local governmental unit; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plat; and there are no wetlands as defined in Minnesota Statutes, 505.02 Subd. 1 or public highways to be designated on the plat. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA David E. Crook, Land Surveyor Minnesota License Number 22414 day of 20 by David E. Crook, Land Surveyor. Notary Public Hennepin County, Minnesota My Commission expires This plot of HARVIEUX ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this day of 20 and is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. All monuments will be set as specified by the City Council and as stated on this plat according to Minnesota Statute. 505.02, Subdivision 1. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Mayor Clerk COUNTY SURVEYOR, Carver County, Minnesota Pursuant to Chapter 395, Minnesota Lows of 1971, this plat has been approved this day of John E. Freemyer: Carver County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR, Carver County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. Dated this COUNTY RECORDER, Carver County, Minnesota hereby certify that this plot of HARVIEUX ADDITION was filed on this day of DEMARS-GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. MARK LUNDGREN BY County Auditor day of 2005. cit—o'clock—M. as Document No. CARL W HANSON JR. By.- County y:County Recorder 20— X . SCANNED