The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-30_2061 WEST 65TH STREET METES & BOUNDS SUBDIVISIONCAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A. Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone:65IA52-5000 ° FAX: 651-234-6237 FILING OF DOCUMENTS TO: . COUNTY RECORDER REGISTRAR OF TITLES Please complete, date, and sign this form upon assigning document numbers for the documents listed below and e-mail Jean Olson at iolsonCack-law.com or fax completed form to the City Attorney's office referenced above. Please mail same to Jean Olson in the self- addressed stamped envelope attached CLIENT/MATTER: CITY OF CRANHASSEN / MOLINE'S ADDITION THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT(S) Abstract WERE FILED: Certified Resolution No. 2015-46 Development Contract Grant of Permanent Easement for public right-of-way, roadway, drainage and utility purposes Quit Claim Deed dated 2/10/15 creating the lot split Grant of Permanent Easement for drainage and utility Document No. NOR Torrens Document No. at --�:6-j o'clock a.d®m. un q 1 ZZ 2015, with the County Recorder / Registrar of Titles of Carver County, Minnesota. SIGNED: Thank you! 183424 - NO -TE: 0�5 i V\aj c�acut+�er�S -�� led in C AS l -?Q eN�1q-.neer,n hal--�c-{;o►1 des CAMPBELL KNUTSON October 16, 2015 Ms. Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner c/o City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Corey Lot Split / Moline's Addition Dear Ms. A]-Jaff: RECEIVED OCT 19 2015 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Enclosed please find the following original recorded documents regarding the above - referenced matter: 1. Resolution No. 2015-46 recorded as Document No. A616940; 2. Development Contract recorded as Document No. A616941; 3. Grant of Permanent Easement for public right-of-way, roadway, drainage and utility purposes recorded as Document No. A616942; 4. Quit Claim Deed dated February 10, 2015 creating the lot split recorded as Document No. A616943; and 5. Grant of Permanent Easement for drainage and utility purposes recorded as Document No. A616944. Very truly yours, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Jean . Olson, Legal Assistant Enclosures 184001 SCANNED Document No. A616940 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Certified Recorded on -September 22, 2015 3:57 PM Fee: $46.00 1111111111111111111 616940 CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) John E Freemyer County Recorder I, Karen J. Engelhardt, duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of Resolution No. 201546, "A Resolution Approving Amendments to Conditions of Approval of a Metes and Bounds Subdivision Creating Two Parcels located at 2061 West 65[11 Street' dated July 27, 2015 with the original copy on file in my office and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof. Witness my hand and official seal at Chanhassen, Minnesota, this 14t11 day of August, 2015. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: July 27, 2015 RESOLUTION NO: 2015-46 MOTION BY: McDonald SECONDED BY: Campion A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF A METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION CREATING TWO PARCELS LOCATED AT 2061 WEST 65TH STREET WHEREAS, John J. and Kimberly E. Corey have requested a subdivision of the property into two lots of 15,165 square feet and 15,159 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council held a public hearing on November 24, 2014, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance and approved Resolution No. 2014-78; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council met on June 8, 2015, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance and approved Resolution No. 2015-35; and WHEREAS, one of the conditions of approval was that the applicant was required to install the sewer and water service to the vacant property (Parcel 2) and submit a $10,000 escrow to ensure that the work was complete and the street properly restored; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the approval, the applicant requested this condition be removed so that the person(s) purchasing and building on the property would be responsible for the installation of the sewer and water service, including the necessary road repair to West 651b Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby: 1. Rescinds resolutions 2014-78 and 2015-35. 2. Approves the following metes and bounds subdivision of 2061 West 65" Street (Planning Case #2014-30) for property legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, Carver County, Minnesota: PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTIO\'S Pam I T%—Wt 97.50 fief of Lot 3, Bbd 2. MOLNTS AMMON. a dmf to the teconkd pial thereof. Caner Courcy Mmwwu togethn wuh easemmu tac dntmge and uWd) proposes oter ander and cars the uwthah 10.05 feet. the southery !0 W fat. toe enWh*500L M atd d* weskiiy 5.00 fat dwmf Pamd 2 That put of Lot 3, Bbd 2. MOLLN7S ADDM(A, actordq m the recorded plat thereof Cana Cou . Mmonoh Ujach Lm eau of the weu 97.50 feel together with nsemmu for dr rt and uUbh p;upo ora uncki and mom the =ttrf) 10 00 W. the wAed, 10 00 feet. the eukdy 5 00 tatand the weucly 5 00 tee; tbewf 3. Amends the conditions of approval to the metes and bounds subdivision for property located at 2061 West 65`" Street (legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, Carver County, Minnesota) as follows: a. Metes and bounds subdivision Parcel I and Parcel 2 with the following conditions: Building 1. The existing structure on proposed Parcel 2 must be provided with sanitary sewer connection — permit required. 2. Proposed Parcel I must be provided with separate sewer and water services (permit required) before a building permit is issued. Engineering The City Attorney shall draft and the developer shall execute a "Grant of Permanent Easement for Public Drainage and Utility Purposes" document. This document shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 2. A roadway, drainage and utility easement must be dedicated over the portion of the existing cul-de-sac within the property and 15 feet beyond the edge of the road. This easement shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. Prior to recording the subdivision the developer shall pay the $45 GIS fee: $25 (subdivision) plus $10/parcel. 4. Sewer and water hookup charges are due for the new le Parcel 1, a portion of which shall be collected before the metes and bounds subdivision is recorded: . Water: 1 unit x $1,957/unit = $1,957 Sewer: 1 unit x $677/unit = $677 The remainder of the sewer and water hookup charges for Parcel 1 shall be collected with the building permit. If the final subdivision submittals are received after 2015; all fees shall be recalculated based on the rates in effect at that time. 6. A plumbing permit is required for the private storm sewer; the plumbing inspector will inspect the connection to the city storm sewer manhole. 7. On Parcel 1, the proposed home style as required by City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (iii) is a slab -on -grade home. Based on Interstate Geotechnical Engineering's observations, the groundwater elevation is 1.8 feet below the ground elevation of the soil boring. The developer must verify the surface elevation of the boring location to determine the elevation of the groundwater; the lowest floor must be minimum three feet above that elevation per City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (i). 8. Before a building permit is issued for Parcel 1, the water service and sanitary sewer service must be installed. The sanitary sewer is within West 65' Street, therefore installation of a sanitary sewer service will require cutting into and patching the City street. A Work in Right of Way permit must be obtained before installing the water and sanitary sewer service; an escrow for street repair to ensure that the street is restored shall be part of the permit requirements. The estimated cost of the street repair was $10,000 in 2014. The escrow amount shall be adjusted according to the construction costs at the time the Work in Right of Way permit is issued 9. Approval of the subdivision is contingent upon the applicant or property owner entering into a development contract with the City. 10. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developer's obligations under this Contract. The City shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City's failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. 11. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract 12. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. 13. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developer's request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make as written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. 14. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 15. Assignability. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or both lots. 16. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or Pollutants were caused to be there by the City. 17. Soil Correction. The property owner or his/her contractor shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi -lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be Provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. 18. As -Built Lot Surveys. An as -built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as -built lot survey must be prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as - built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as -built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as -built escrow withheld until all work is complete. Environmental Resource Specialist 1. Tree protection fencing will be required around any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading and located at the drip lines of the trees. 2. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with City Code Section 18-61. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City's approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (2'/z) inches caliper, either bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line). The lot purchaser shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways on each lot utilizing a minimum of four (4) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the lot. If these improvements are not in place at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested, a financial guarantee of $750.00 in the form of cash or letter of credit shall be provided to the City. These conditions must then be complied with within two (2) months after the certificate of occupancy issued, except that if the certificate of occupancy is issued between October I through May 1 these conditions must be complied with by the following July 1 st. Upon expiration of the time period, inspections will be conducted by City staff to verify satisfactory completion of all conditions. City staff will conduct inspections of incomplete items with a $50.00 inspection fee deducted from the escrow fund for each inspection. After satisfactory inspection, the financial guarantee shall be returned. If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The City may also use the escrowed funds for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. Parks I. Park fees of $5,800.00 shall be paid for each new single-family lot prior to the recording of the property deed. Planning Deeds shall be submitted to the city for review and recorded at Carver County for the two parcels. 2. A building permit shall not be issued unless all soil corrections have been completed as indicated in the attached exhibits titled "Subsurface Soil Investigation" dated October 25, 2014 and November 13, 2014. Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 4. Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 505.02, Subd. 1. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 5. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developer represents that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. 6. Compliance with Laws Ordinances and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: a) City of Chanhassen; b) State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; c) United States Army Corps of Engineers; d) Watershed District(s); e) Metropolitan Goverment, its agencies, departments and commissions. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. Water Resource Coordinator 1. Total surface water management fees due prior to recording the property deed are $1,914.55. 2. Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be fiunished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 27`" day of July, 2015. ATTEST: Tdad Gerhardt, City Clerk/Manager YES NO Laufenburger None Campion McDonald Ryan Tjomhom 0 Denny fenbur, er, Mayor ABSENT None N Document No. A616941 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Certified Recorded on -September 22, 2015 3:57 PM Fee: $46.00 VIIIIIIIVIIIIil 616941 County Recorder 61 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 2 OF MOLINE'S ADDITION 181797v1 DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL PROVISIONS PAGE 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL................................................................................ SP -1 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL............................................................................ SP -1 3. DEVELOPMENT PLANS................................................................................................. SP -1 4. IMPROVEMENTS............................................................................................................. SP -1 5. NOTICE..............................................................................................................................SP-1 6. OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS.................................................................................... SP -2 181797v1 i CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 2, MOLINE'S ADDITION SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated May 26, 2015 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and JOHN J. COREY AND KIMBERLY E. COREY, husband and wife (the "Developers"). 1. Request for Subdivision Approval. The Developers have asked the City to approve a metes and bounds subdivision of Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition (referred to in this Contract as the "subdivision"). The land is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2. Conditions of Subdivision Approval. The City hereby approves the subdivision on condition that the Developers enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the subdivision documents with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 30 days after the City Council approves the subdivision. 3. Development Plans. The subdivision shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. The plans are: Plan A: Lot Split Exhibit for 2061 West 65`s Street approved May 26, 2015, prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Plan B: Grading and Erosion Control Plan dated October 31, 2014, prepared by Sathre- Bergquist, Inc. Plan C: Utility Plan dated October 31, 2014, prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. 4. Improvements. The party that secures a building permit for Parcel 1 shall be responsible for installing the improvements shown on Plan B and Plan C and shall acquire all necessary permits and post all necessary securities to perform the work. 5. Notice. Required notices to the Developers shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developers, their employees or agents, or mailed to the Developers by registered mail at the following address: 181797A SP -1 John 1. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey 6409 Oxbow Bend Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone: 952-227-1100. 6. Other Special Conditions. A. FEES The $10,393.55 cash fee and the fully -executed development contract must be submitted before the subdivision is recorded. The cash fees were calculated as follows: Partial Payment of Water Hook -Up Fee: 1 unit x $1,957/unit = $1,957.00 Partial Payment of Sewer Hook -Up Fee: 1 unit x $677/unit = $677.00 GIS fee: $25 (subdivision) + $10/parcel x 2 parcels = $45.00 Park Dedication Fee: 1 dwelling x $5,800/dwelling = $5,800.00 Surface Water Management fee: $1,914.55 Total Cash Fee = $10,393.55 . B. BUILDING OFFICIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The existing structure on proposed Parcel 2 must be provided with sanitary sewer connection — permit required. 2. Proposed Parcel 1 must be provided with separate sewer and water services (permit required) before a building permit is issued C. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF APPROVAL 1. The City Attorney shall draft and the developer shall execute a "Grant of Permanent Easement for Public Drainage and Utility Purposes" document. This document shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 2. A roadway, drainage and utility easement must be dedicated over the portion of the existing cul-de-sac within the property and 15 feet beyond the edge of the road. This easement shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 3. Prior to recording the subdivision the developer shall pay the $45 GIS fee: $25 (subdivision) plus $10/parcel. 181797v1 SP -2 4. Before a building permit is issued for Parcel 1, the water service and sanitary sewer service must be installed. The sanitary sewer is within West 65th Street, therefore installation of a sanitary sewer service will require cutting into and patching the City street. A Work in Right of Way permit must be obtained before installing the water and sanitary sewer service; an escrow for street repair to ensure that the street is restored shall be part of the permit requirements. The estimated cost of the street repair was $10,000 in 2014. The escrow amount shall be adjusted according to the construction costs at the time the Work in Right of Way permit is issued. Sewer and water hookup charges are due for Parcel 1, a portion of which shall be collected before the metes and bounds subdivision is recorded: Water:l unit x $1,957/unit = $1,957 Sewer: 1 unit x $677/unit = $677 The remainder of the sewer and water hookup charges for Parcel 1 shall be collected with the building permit. 6. If the final subdivision submittals are received after 2015, all fees shall be recalculated based on the rates in effect at that time. 7. A plumbing permit is required for the private storm sewer; the plumbing inspector will inspect the connection to the city stone sewer manhole. 8. On Parcel 1, the proposed home style as required by City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (iii) is a slab -on -grade home. Based on Interstate Geotechnical Engineering's observations, the groundwater elevation is 1.8 feet below the ground elevation of the soil boring. The Developers must verify the surface elevation of the boring location to determine the elevation of the groundwater; the lowest floor must be minimum three feet above that elevation per City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (i). 9. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developers' obligations under this Contract. The City shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City's failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. 10. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. 11. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. 181797v1 SP -3 12. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property . After the Developers have completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developers' request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make as written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. 13. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 14. Assignability. The Developers may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developers' obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developers sell one or both lots. 15. Soil Conditions. The Developers acknowledge that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developers may make use of such property. The Developers further agree that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. 16. Soil Correction. The owner of Parcel I is responsible for the necessary soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developers concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi -lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. 17. As -Built Lot Surveys. An as -built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as -built lot survey must be prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as -built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as -built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as -built escrow withheld until all work is complete. 181797v1 SP -4 D. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SPECIALIST CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Tree protection fencing will be required around any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading and located at the drip lines of the trees. 2. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with City Code Section 18-61. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City's approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (2'/s) inches caliper, either bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line). The lot purchaser shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways on each lot utilizing a minimum of four (4) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the lot. If these improvements are not in place at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested, a financial guarantee of $750.00 in the form of cash or letter of credit shall be provided to the City. These conditions must then be complied with within two (2) months after the certificate of occupancy issued, except that if the certificate of occupancy is issued between October 1 through May 1 these conditions must be complied with by the following July I st. Upon expiration of the time period, inspections will be conducted by City staff to verify satisfactory completion of all conditions. City staff will conduct inspections of incomplete items with a $50.00 inspection fee deducted from the escrow fund for each inspection. After satisfactory inspection, the financial guarantee shall be returned. If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The City may also use the escrowed funds for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. E. PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR CONDITION OF APPROVAL: Park fees of $5,800.00 shall be paid for each new single-family lot prior to the recording of the property deed. F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Deeds shall submitted to the city for review and recorded at Carver County for the two parcels. 2. A building permit shall not be issued unless all soil corrections have been completed as indicated in Exhibits `B" and "C" titled "Subsurface Soil Investigation" dated October 25, 2014 and November 13, 2014, respectively. 3. Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developers. Thereafter, 181791v1 SP -5 notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 4. Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 505.02, Subd. 1. The Developers' surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 5. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developers represent that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. 6. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developers shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: a) City of Chanhassen; b) State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; c) United States Army Corps of Engineers; d) Watershed District(s); e) Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. 7. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developers shall fun ish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. G. WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Total surface water management fees due prior to recording the property deed are $1,914.55. 2. Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be furnished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 1817970 SP -6 CITY OF CHANHASSEN vW (SEAL) 0 -►1`7i STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisoZ" Aday of 2015, by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manag, f th City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation an pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. 181797vl SP -7 DEVELOPERS: John STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF) E. Corey 69- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisa6 day of 2015, by John J. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey, husband and wife. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-227-1100 1 B 1797v 1 SP -8 NOTARY PUBLIC EXHIBIT "A" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Lot 3, Block 2 of Moline's Addition according to the recorded plat thereof in Carver County, Minnesota 1s1797A EXHIBIT "B" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT 181797v1 Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc Patrick J Hines, PE 8167 IV s, s Caease CroW MM 55016 (612)414-5770 25 October 2014 Mr James Rudos 14846 Timber Hill Road Minnetonka WN 55345 Re: Subsurface Soil Investigation Proposed Single Family Residence W of 2061 W 651 St, Chanhassen, Minn In accordance with your authorization, I have completed the above referenced investigation to determine site suitability for the proposed construction. A summary of my findings together with boring logs and my conclusions and recommendations are presented in the enclosed report. 1 found, as you already have been briefed, more than usual problems with the site. There is a total of 5'/; & 6'/,'at the locations of Boring I & Probe IA, respectively, of unsuitable soil in the form of topsoil fill, general and varying fill, and buried original humus. Below at first is a low sand content lean clay, generally dark in color, saturated, very soft to soft (w/ depth). It is "normally consolidated" (consolidated enough to only support its owri weight, not additional weight of fill soils or structures aline). The overburdening fill has not been inplace long enough to force further consolidation. The moisture content test in this material indicated nearly 42%, high for a lean clay. This material extends only from 5'/; to 7' in Boring 1, but from 6'/,'to 8'/,'in Probe 1 A. The first 9" of this material in Probe I A is very soft and is a borderline marl material. All of the aforementioned materials are unsuitable for structure support should be removed. I do acknowledge that excavators are often reluctant to excavate further once the buried organic soil is cleared, so understandings should be inplace at the time of gathering bids. Base soil below at first is a lean clay, a little sandy, dark gray, saturated, rather soft to medium. It has inclusions of a poorly graded (biased finer grained) sand with a few fines, also dark gray, saturated, loose to firm. Deepest soil, commencing at 11' in Boring 1, is a lean clay, rather sandy, dark gray, low gravel content, medium. Theses materials arc glacia! till. The sand inclusions in the upper portion are glacial outwash. All of these base mineral soils are suitable for residential construction, with conditions. Refusal to auger advancement was not encountered by boring termination depth of 23', indicating lack of bedrock to this level. Very importantly, groundwater was found in the [Hain Boring at 1.8' (elev 96'/J. It is aquifer groundwater, but marginally so. It appears to be contained primarily in the sand inclusions at 7'+. But it also is coming from the upper soft and very soft clay, possibly from 181797%1 NIT James Rudos 25 October 2014 Page 2 the lower organic soil. Proper construction on the site (removing the softer lean clay, promoting good site drainage) will mitigate some of this. Thus, water found presently can be regarded as a maximum level. Slab grade of the proposed residence should be set in accordance with City requirements utilizing this level. I recommend complete removal of all unsuitable soil which is likely to be the fill and buried organic soil as encountered plus the overly soft clay found in both the boring and probe. While this amounts only to another 1'(; in the vicinity of Boring 1, it is another Ti in the vicinity of Probe IA. As indicated, excavators may be reluctant to excavate below organic soil level, but it is necessary (see lunger discussion in the report). It is so important that full time inspection of the excavation by a soils engineer may be necessary. Of course, other zones of unsuitable soil not represented by the boring and probe could still be encountered due to the nature of small volume random sampling. Any other depths or zones of unsuitable soil should be removed as well. You could lower footings somewhat so that you have to provide less ovcrsizing and not stray onto the neighbor's property. But footings here should not be lowered so much as to rest directly upon the suitable base soil as it is only marginally suitable. You need a little fill (Tis recommended) to spread footing loads out with depth. Footings maybe generally designed allowing the usual 2000 psf foundation bearing capacity, which will likely result in normal strip or pad footings. Special attention is again drawn to the advisory that excavations be examined by the Soils Engineer to verify soil boring results and to document adequacy of site preparation. Again this is very important as how much softivery soft clay must be removed will require a high degree of field judgment. Fill, as used, should be tested for compaction adequacy. Soil correction should not be abated below slabs in any manner (ie, do not let the excavator try to "trench around" slab areas). Thank you for the opportunity to have been of service. If you have any questions on this, or if I can be of assistance in any additional capacity, do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, II3 WTATE GEOTECHNICAL ENGRQEERING, Inc ckn`es;,� President enclosures pHISC 181797v1 SLSSURFACE GEOTECEMCAL IMFS'1'[GATION PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE W of 2461 W 65° St, Cbaahama, MInoesota Prepared by: Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc 8167100' Street S Cottage Grove A4i 55016 251 October 2014 1817971 lut to Gmteehaleai Engineering, )ne P8=Kk J HMPE 8167100° st S eer,t Oovc 4M 55016 (612)4W5773 REPORT of SUBSURFACE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Fon PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE West of 2061 W 65' St, Chanhassen, Minnesota 25 October 2014 SCOPE OF SERVICES Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, hereafter referred to as "IGE", was retained by James Rudos, hereafter referred to as the "Client', to perform a subsurface soil investigation on a parcel of land located as noted in the above title block. The purpose of this investigation is, as this is a' llot split", to identify and evaluate soil and water properties associated with the site with respect to constructing a single family residence thereon. One primary soil boring was performed band and power flight auger methods to a depth of 23' within the project area. In addi9on, laboratory tests were run upon selected soil samples, and a shallower probe was put down to further delineate depth and extent of unsuitable soil. From the resulting data, conclusions are drawn regarding site suitability for the proposed use and recommendations aredeveloped, hated upon information gathered to date within the presently authorized scope of services, for site correction procedures and foundation and slab design. SITE OBSERVATIONS The general area is suburban residential in nature, moderate in elevation. Vicinity structures vary in age and design, but are generally newer, in good condition. What is noted, however, is that depths of installation seem to be rather shallow. This site is rather level in terrain patter, flat from street grade. There is an abandoned wastewater treatment mound on the site. Tine site is covered mainly by short maintained grasses, with trees and brush, mostly to the rear, and landscaping plants at various locations. Proposed construction on rise site is a single fam..ily residence. It most likely will be of slab -on -grade or crawl space design configuration with attached garage. Location was not known, but most likely it will beat setbacks similar to those in the vicinity, possibly slightly more to the front. Given site grade versus street level, the site will be built up P-2' in any event for positive drainage. It is assumed that the residence will be of usual wood frame design with most building loads transferred to exterior and interior strip footings at frost protection depth (3.5' or greater below finished grade). This type of structure imparts relatively light loads onto foundation soil. BORING LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS The boring and probe locations were determined by IGE and were based upon Likely location of the proposed construction, initial impressions and assumptions, accessability, obstacles, etc. IGE also determined depths based upon nature of the proposed work, usual and accepted practice and results of the investigation as it proceeded. All work was 181797vl W of 2061 W 65" St, C-banhwelL N.inn .2. performed in an attempt to obtain geotechnical data representative of the site. Refer to the attached sketch for boring locations. In addition, they were marked in the field with lath. As the west property line location was not totally assured, borings should be more accurately located in the course of future site surveys. Ground surface elevation at the boring and probe locations and at a few key topographic points was determine:: to the nearest 0.1' using an engincer's level and referenced to top nut of a fire hydrant or. the south side of 65° St W, aucroximately 150' west of the area investigated, located as shown on the referenced skeicC As there was no conveniently available sea level datum bench mark nearby, this temporary bench mark was assigned an arbitrary reference elevation of 100.00. Elevations are shown on bore logs and on the site sketch. Accuracy of this should not be taken as any greater than the methods used would imply. Again, in the course of further site surveys, elevations of the boriag and probe should be more accurately determined in accordance with a sea level datum. FOLD IN VESTiGAT ION The boring and probe were primarily accomplished by the Powe: Flight Auger (FA) and Hand Auger (HA) methods in accordance with AST lot D 1452, "Standard Practice for Soil Investigation and Sampling by Auger Boeings". As the hand augerupper portion of the main boring was advanced in sandy soil, one supplemental test was performed using the "Dynamic Cone Penetrometer" (DCP) method These procedures are described in attachments at the back of the text portion of this report. The first attachatent also describes the soil classification system used (Unified - chart attached) and method of groundwater measurement. A Professional Engineer personally performed the boring and probe and immediately classified soils in the field. Soil strength was determined by said engineer mostly on an empirical basis by such means of drilling ease or difficulty, nature of recovered soil samples, consultation of laboratory and DCP test results, etc. Some samples were bagged and returned to the soils laboratory for further exarniration and possible testing. Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with ASTM standards. SOIL BORING RESULTS Attached is a log for the boring together with a key explaini.g terms and entries on the log sheets. Results of the shallower probe are given in more summary form on the continuation sheet of the log for the train boring. The depth of individual layers of soils may vary somewhat from what is shown on the logs due to the inexact nature of auger sampling and, most importantly, the occurrence of transil"on between soil layers. Also be advised that soil conditions not at the boring and probe locations may vary. Laboratory test (moisture content) results are given in the'W' colutmn o`tiie boring log at the appropriate relative locations. The DCP test result is given in the right -most column of the boring log, again at the appropriate relative location. The borings show a condition of fill over original organic soil, with overly soft soil below. The flit is 2'/,'in the rnair. boring, slightly less it.. the probe, and consists of topsoil fill [a variably sandy organic lean clay (OL), black] and a mixed sca fill, most of it lean clay, somewhat sandy, dark in color (CL) with a little organic soil (OL). Below, to total depths of 5'/4& 6'/, in Boring I and Probe IA, respectively, is wast appears to be buried original humus, a lean clay, rather silty, highly organic (OL), black. In upper reaches it 181797vl W o'2061 W 65" St, Chanh• a, Minn _a_ might be a borderline sapric peat. The thickness togeilier with the highly organic nature could mean that this originated in a shallow depth swamp. As a minimum, these soils are unsuitable for construction. Application of foundation loads upon them will undoubtedly result in differential settlement and loss of value of the new structure. In addition, modem building codes prohibit establishment of residential structures on or over organic or otherwise unsuitable soil. Below at first in Boring 1 is a lean clay, a little sandy, very dark to dark gray (CL), saturated, very soft to soft (w/ depth). This appears to be a lacustrine (lake origin) deposit. It is "normally consolidated" (consolidated enough to only support its own weight and original soil weight above, not additional weight of fill soils or structures above). The overburdening fill has not been inplace long enough, geologically, to force further consolidation. The moisture content test in this material is 41.9%, high for a lean clay of this nature. It is obviously near or over the liquid limit of this material (est 40%++). In such a scenario, the material is very soft, prone to consolidation upon application of further loads. This material extends only from 5'/4 to T in Boring 1, but from 6'/; to 81/= in Probe 1 A. The first 9" of this material in Probe 1 A is very soft and is a borderline marl material. Base soil below at fust is a lean clay, a little sandy (CL), dark gray, saturated, rather soft to medium (confirmed by another moisture content test). It has inclusions of a poorly graded (biased finer grained) sand with a few fines (SP), also dark gray, saturated, loose to firm (as per DCP test result). Deepest soil, commencing at 11' in Boring 1, is a lean clay, rather sandy, dark gray (CL), low gravel content, medium. Theses materials are glacial till. The sand inclusions in the upper portion are glacial outwash. All of these base mineral soils are suitable for residential construction, with conditions. Refusal to auger advancement was not encountered by power boring termination depth, elevation 75±, indicating lack of bedrock at least to this o:evation. Groundwater was found in the main boring as evidenced by standing water in the bore hole after a standard period of monitoring, depth 1.8' (elev 96'/.x. This is a surprisingly high level given the moderate elevation of the area and its seemingly well drained nature. It is, however, aquifer groundwater, but marginally so. It appears to be contained primarily in the sand inclusions at T+. But it alsc is coming from the upper soft and very soft clay, possibly from the Iowa organic soil, once a void (the bore hole) became available. Proper construction on the site (removing the softer lean clay, promoting good site drainage) will mitigate some of this. Thus, water found presently can be regarded as a maximum level. It should be pointed out that most of the lower elevation sandier lean clay soils are deal] saturated (all pores filled with water), but nQt waterbearin (capable ofrelessing this water). Ibis is a normal condition for a soft to medium or better clay. As indicated, the upper lean clay soils, being soft to very soft, do release water. However, be advised, as explained in the attaclunen4 that groundwater may still occur and vary according to various climatological and meteorological influences undetermined within the time Name, scope and budget allowed in this investigation. In addition, area development patterns and drainage alterations can influence soil moisture and groundwater. Bear in mind that indicated results are for time and conditions of testing only. Refer to the boring and probe log for a more detailed description of soils and moisture conditions encountered. 181797%1 W or 2061 w W S1, ChanhassM Mia -'1- CONCLUSIONS A.VD RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon interpreted results of boring and probe logs, including laboratory tests, their relation to the planned work, and other information. Because the boring, probe and tests represent a small portion of the site in relation to the proposed area of work, ongoing review of construction should be tamed out. If excavations reveal subsurface soils of a different nanue than. those observed in the boring and probe, or if the location or elevations or type of the planned work arc altered significantly, the Soils Engineershould be contracted for possibly revised recommendations or additional testing (see #6 below and the following "Limitations of Investigation"). 1. Qeneral Site Suitability Based upon interpreted results of the borings, it appears that the site has some limitations regarding suitability for construction. These mainly consist of the presence of fill over buried original topsoil, soft to very soft clay below (thickness varying), high groundwater on the site and the need to adapt the site in general for the intended use. These limitations are correctable by adequate site correction, foundation engineering and further monitoring of soils as construction proceeds. 2. Initial Site Pnparation: This analysis is based upon the proposed structure being, as indicated earlier, of slab - on -grade or crawl spare design with attached garage, grade set to meet City requirements. Exterior footings will be at least 3'/= below final grade. Interior footings could be at subslab level ifplaced upon properly compacted fill. Unless marginal soils are left below correction levels, some footings could be lowered if more convenient to deal with unsuitable soil levels. All organic, loose, frozen or otherwise unsuitable soil, uncontrolled fill, vegetation, debris and boulders (3"+) and, most importantly in this case, the soft to very soft lean clay, should be removed from the proposed building pad area, generally achieving the first naturally occurring suitable soil, likely a rather soft to medium or better somewhat sandy lean clay, with waterbearing sand inclusions. Bor mg evidence suggests that this will amount to excavation depths of at least T and 8'/2' at the locations of Boring 1 and Probe ]A, respectively. If working room is not adequate for safe excavation backslopes, or perhaps just to control excavation and filling extent, footings could be lowered somewhat so that proper oversizing and a safe backslope, not straying onto the neighbor's property, can be provided. But as base soils, even wher. corrected, are marginal at first, footings in this vicinity should not be lowered so much as to rest on or near base soil. There should be at least T of properly compacted fill below footings to allow some spread of foundation load with depth. It is also noted that areas below slab areas should be corrected as well, not attempting to trench around them. Some discussion should be made about over -excavating out the soft to very soft lean clay. Excavators are often reluctant to do this once buried organic soil is cleared. Again it is pointed out that field indications plus a laboratory test indicate this material to be soft to very soft. It is estimated to have a coefficient of consolidation (c.1 of 0.15. Applying this to the thickness of the soft layer (1'-2) and considering likely new stream, if this material were not removed, a long term settlement of approximately 1" to 2" would result This is 181797vl W of 2061 W 6r St, Chud awen, Minn -s- excessive for this structure. When obtaining excavation bids, this overexcavation necessity should be clear to excavators so that problems, contractual or otherwise, are less likely to occur later. During the construction phase, the amount ofexcavation ofoverly soft clay will necessitate a high degree of judgment. It is possible that full time observation by a soils engineer will be required Based upon the fact that the excavation will be below water level, water will enter and accumulate in the excavation. This water should be controlled, such as by sumping or other means, so that the bottom of the excavation can be viewed and so that water does not interfere with compaction efforts in the lowest levels. It should again be emphasized, however, that the estimated depths of excavation of unsuitable soil given above are preliminary estimates based upon random but somewhat targeted auger tests. These should be cotisidered preliminary estimates only, to be verified by actual excavations. In fact, for construction cuan!ity purposes, a small amount of additional estimated excavation depth should be added to that given in the logs to conservatively allow for variations and for inadvertent over -excavations which are impossible to avoid when power machinery is employed for the purpose. It is especially cautioned that there could be areas of unsuitable soil not represented by the boring and probe to date. These zones could be grubbed out tree stump pits, an old basement, trash pits, borrow pits, test excavations, utility trenches, etc. Excavators should be especially aware of this possibility. Excavated organic material, uncontrolled fill, wet unstable soil or other soil contaminated with topsoil, vegetation, etc, should be disposed of offsite, or in landscaping areas, where the bearing of weight will not be required There appears to be no opportunity to salvage excavated mineral soil for re -use as controlled fill as said excavated soil, even if mineral soil, will be cohesive, overmoist and difficult to work with. The excavation contractor will likely import a granular fill. Refer to subsequent sections for more detailed and specific recommendations for site correction recommendations for each structural component 3. Foundations: Forpurpeses of proposed construction, foundations and fill to support foundations must rest upon and over mineral (non-organic) soils of adequate bearing value. For the proposed construction, a bearing capacity of 2003 pounds per square foot (psf) is typically targeted. However, most single family residences actually bear much less, even under maximum snow load This analysis of soil for foundation purposes is based upon the location, design configuration and grade indicated above. If there is any significant deviation from assumptions indicated herein, then these recommendations may have to be reconsidered. The site should be prepared as outliaed in k2 above, removing unsuitable soil, including the overly soft clay that exists over the building pad area, performing any further excavation as necessary, Controlling water that may enter the excavation and placing controlled fill (minimum 2') as needed. This being done, perimeter and interior footings maybe generally designed allowing 2000 psf foundation bearing capacity (likely resulting in ordinary spread or pad footings). This value is recommended on the basis of the fact that the footing areas will rest directly upon fill that has been compacted to the level specified in N5 below. This 181797v W of 2061 W W St, ChuffizMinn -6- takes into account shear failure potential near .footing levels and the nature of deeper soil regarding settlement. Fill, as required, should be placed, compacted, and tested as per the 'Till Placement" (k5) section following. The above should provide a factor of safety against foundation failure of approximately 3. Over-all and differential settlements should be less than'/=" and'(,", respectively. If footing conditions change from what has been assumed herein, further study and analysis would be necessary. If the site is graded to dif%rent levels than assumed above, if the type of building proposed change, or if soils of a significantly different nature are discovered during excavations, the Soils Engineer should be contacted for re -analysis and possibly revised recommendations. It is not recommended •w place fop_:ngs upon or over organic soil or any other unsuitable soil or to deviate from recommendations contained herein, as excessive differential settlement of the structure could resat. 4. Slabs: Slabs and fill to support slabs should also rest upon and ever mineral soil of adequate density to resist settlement. Based upon boring evidence, base mineral soils on the site, with uncontrolled fila, organic soil, vegetation and any other encountered unsuitable soil removed and wivS contioNed fill placed thereon as necessary are adequate for sisb support. It is not recommended to abate site preparation below slabs in any manner. Slabs should have clearance from maximum anticipated aquifer groundwater level and should be protected from intrusion by surface waters. As ird•.cated above, floor level of this structum should be set in accordance with City requirements, utilizing the leve'. of ground"'W found as a maximum level. Good site drainage; both at the time ofconstmrticn and for the life of the structure, is recommended. S. Fill Placement: Fill material, as required, should be mineral soil, free of debris, boulders and organic material, of such suitable moisture content that it can be readily compacted to specified levels. Fill should be placed and compacted in a manner that will allow complete compaction cf to total fill layer to 95% of Standard Maximum Density according to ASTM D 698. Frozen material should not be used in fill construction, nor should any part of the competed fill be allowed to freeze. A soil compaction test should be conducted for every two feet of fill in appropriate segments cf the area. If crushed rock or any other very coarse granular soil or aggregate (>30% 314" or coarser) is used, the above Standard Maximum Density would not be applicable. In this case, the fill should be compacted to 60% of Maxim Index Density according to ASTM D 4253. Top of fill should extend at least one foot horizontally beyond the structure pad or footing limits. The fill surface may then extend downward and outward on a 1:1 slope to competent soil. It is upon this basis that required oversizing should be computed. 181797N W of 2061 W 65" St Ch&ahwen, Minn '7- 6. lnsoectior. and Testing: The Client should retain a geotechnical engineering firm to inspect excavations, make field judgments as to subsoil adequacy, and to carry out a program of field and laboratory testing of engineered fill and possibly other materials. This firm should bear full responsibility for knowledge of contents of this report and for proper interpretation and correlation of data, and be prepared to make any further analysis as necessary. Again, this is especially necessary in this case due to the high degree of judgment necessary regarding first encountered clay soils. 7. Final Site Topggraohv: Final soil surfaces should be graded to provide adequate drainage from structures and hard surfaces so that as little water as possible infiltrates into soils adjacent to the structure. LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATI N Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, has prepared h'» s report using an ordinary level of care and in accordance with generally accepted foundation and soil engineering practices. Because the boring, probe and tests represent only a small portion of the total site and for other reasons, Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, does not warrant that the boring, probe and tests are necessarily representative of the entire site but only of the boring, probe and test locations at the time of investigation. No warranty of the site is made or implied. The scope of this report is limited strictly to geotechnical issues which include establishment of soil profile and only those conclusions expressly made. Please note that this work is not intended to document the presence or absence of any environmental contaminants at the site, nor for identifying applicable local, state or federal laws or regulations of a eon -geotechnical nature which may or may not be applicable to this site. Further, Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, cannot be held responsible for fws not disclosed The bore holes have backfilled the as well as possible using native cuttings. While the deeper Boring i did not produce an Environmental Bore Hole as defined by Minnesota Department of Health regulations, Bentonite was added to the cuttings during the backfilling process. However, some continuing settlement may occur if construction does not take place in the near future. If settlement does occur, the Client should backfill with additional soil. This report and all supporting information is furnished only to the Client and his assigns for the designated purpose. No representations to other parties or for other uses are made. Soil samples retrieved during the investigation process were classified in the field by a Soils Engineer. Most of them were immediately discarded Samples returned to the laboratory will be held for a period of 30 days unless a request is received to retain them for a longer period. 181797v1 W of 2061 w 65' St, Chanhum, m, Minn -8- ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. INTERSTATE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, Inc Patrick J Hines, PE, PresidenteNafDate Registration No. 12086 .ray v`oo �s�.l .Y •: 12086 Proofed by. SC y iRAh +u 1817970 MMOD OF INVEST:GATION AUGER BOR:NGS The Auger Boring procedcre is one of the simplest metbeds of soi-, vestigation and sampling. Its limitations are that recovered samples arc disturbed samples, and that depth of possible investigation is limited 'ty various factors. Depending upon skill of the operator or crew chief, various engineering properties of soil, such as soil profile, estimated inplace strength, etc, may be determined by this method. It may also be used to retrieve samples for lcbaratory testing and determination of suitability of soil for other purposes.This describes the most often procedures used. In this procedure, augers are advanced into the ground by hydraulic/ mechanical means. At intervals, usually 5', tike auger withdrawn and soil samples are retrieved and classified, retainins samples as necessary for fcrther analysis. Record data includes depth to changes in strata, descrip- tion of soil in each major stratum, groundwater depth or elevation where found, end other information. This is in accordance with the Amerlcar. Society for Testing and Materials (ASM Designation: D 1452-80, "Standard Practice for Sell Investigation and Sampling by Auger Borings". Sometimes, hand auger borings of various types are used to accomplish the same purpose. however, penetration depth is usually limited. Its advon- t3ge is greater accuracy and the (act that a hand auger boring may be the only type possible where access Is limited for power eu;er machirery. (over) 181797vl Attaehinent to L•ngineenng l(epon Interstate lieotechmcal Engineenog, hoc METHOD OF IN VEJ I WA I IOIv Dynamic Cone Penetrometer the Dynamic Cone Fenetrometer (L)CF) procedure is an increasingly accepted method to investigate soil in limited zones, to augrnetit eastmg testing, or to test in relatively isolated or inaccessible arra. It is a relatively i±ghtweight device that evaluates soil consistency and density. it is "dytwnic", versus static, in that it utilizes a telling weight in the testing. The device utilizes a 15M steel ring weight telling 20' on an E -rod slide (see sketch below). At the end of the E -rod assembly is a specially shaped cone that is driven into the soil by repeated drops of the hammer on the anvil. The cone is slightly enlarged at its base to minimize shaft resistance above. The test is either made at existing surface level, but most likely through an augered hole (see separate "Auger Borings" procedure). Soil profile is established through this latter procedure. At test depth, the cone is seated 2" (the "set") into undisturbed soil for proper embedment. The come point is then further driven !%" by the 154 harnmer dropping 20". The blows to drive the cone V/." into the soil are counted and recorded. Sometimes, a second and third penetration can be made in this same set By successively advancing the bort hole and adding rods, tests can be made at various levels. This procedure may be used to depths of up to 15 or 20 fee: Rod mor -1& $1.00 .,., we .Is Sliding Drive Hamer 181797vl Cone Point Iaterotate Geotechnlcal raglwerfug, Inc V l`HIM SOIL CLASS c lCATTO 1 �� Major skawo T!rel .tecta [aDtnalp} tWtlMDee alela Lryy wl'F� N,h p+•e+uk tn. a tv:w wn k rte. • ID�ln.a,! ue 1 a:invn. Izlk v ro figs � D. O...0. PVOrII � i ' 4 e Gr a:.aeo N•ri. CaM. aw vevure, IUDe «ro to ` � Hq mea.na V. x LL Gm t r i l' � n L ! � q Ar Nwk, pn6,vd.J ! � � Aaar4'I Fina! 4eI+K •A• i i ! t ,eewa 4 v ks « r.l. ba loan e Atsa -A" da int P.1. 3 S _ _ t�t t ) I ( Mw „e •ec•Fw K cumm..h m•��.anaaa• y = •' AIR9n54rto aDa.e ^A' a oral n.nDob �7 ami ca sw W.wm t : m !M ell. g 3 C•. D ro.e o.... 4.O O. Y,.,e. w.e Is a i ! I t S V sy raa) IItaeC ar+l:. m`ar S +�- ar4k,4uroh+a ia# b eats en paLuae reovamay. !« sw L S 23Y3 `s'i— it3f-� ku J,ana leo r4.,alin na�.�nr i [ +wva r MVI.I. l,M • N GbCI.IIl 6,0 SC tlt,n uM+, aiOM >fl,_ � alw'A' _ e i i j t w y a eap.mla ur w'ari nm. beb Ym i—a{6+z I't^ ke Htr.l psYOtlWI' kOW. tYa na v+ Rx ML fed1.r� P.. Yl) O Mn tl . M xba a.twa.Mwn M/naia IWI palsy M ti Yspnie `u» or b+ a te• } b p� aal! tt 6y pts:Oe>, mM. eYw �weNr1 L��.a, p«ant n 9 � � � fi '� unwi•u rwss.a. sa i e a da" dt» r r. rlrrel. w Y A NH Gww,wtorw ,vet.w [ m elaf+.' .ts CX I,eYsr .Un W l�pl ps H i : t C i i CX Oays eb.. a.•.,,aryw V 0 q T JO tl W O A b f0 Atpt aW,s+•a. «yns tsa I £ t n Pm act a:,c lyvi vµ« lean l es i W 46th Street _. hlom.1ri s_ curb d BBBCH MAB70 Top not of fire �j' hydrant on south side 4.r of ntreet. approz oo east line.eztende! of' eue lot; Blev+ 100.00 �• (muteary) LOCATIONS OF Patrick J Binns. PR SOIL BORINGS 8167 100th St S Cottage GrovA MN 55016 . Proposed Single Family Residence West of 2061 u 66th Street Chanhassen. Minnesota Client: James Rudos Minnetonka. Minn Patrick J Hines, PE y..� YVY-`•V YW 8167 100th St S Cottage Grove MN 55016 tl Proposed ng a Family —Residence PROJECT: West of 2061 W bS<h St. Chanhassen, Minn LOG OF BORING NO: DEPTri _ SURFACE ELEVATION: g 1GEOLOGY N WB SAMPLE LAE t OTHER TESTS IN — FEET OESC RIPTIONAND CLASSIFICATION // TY?E R I W E. L.L. LEAN CLAY, variably sandy, Organic (01, Topsoil R•L t ue ; Black, w/ er's mineral Soil, Fill N 1 jl 1 very moist, loose to firm V• I P[ed Cir �' CL Fill ( KA Zj"j v/ s 1]ttle Otgadc Soli. v/ tr Wml' A®fat to very mist, loose to fist/ 3JLEAN CLAY, rather silty, Organic (OL) Burled 3 PA Black, v/ small roots, We undecom- Hunus i 4 posed vegetation, saturated, rather 1 borderline Sapric Peat in soft et par [fon 5.75 el 11 hter, leas organic, v�/ depth 6-PLEAN CLAY, a little sante eery Dark to Lacustrine Y 4 HA 41.9 Dark Gray (CL), very soft to soft (w/ Deposit de4th) 71, Poor y graded re rine gr, v Glacial Y 5 RA 8/13 med, tr cs), v/ a few fines, Dark Gray Till, v/ (SP).saturated, loose to firm Outwash Y 6 FA 25. Jbanded v/ LEAN CLAY, a little sandy, inclusion .Dark Gray (CL), saturated, rather soft soft to medium @ 81'+ 10 more bands of clay, less of sand, v/ depth 11 I LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray Glacial N 7 FA 12 (CL), w/ a little gravel Till saturated, medium 14 I 15 N 8 FA 16= 17- 18- 1920 111 I Ii J 51i is wh-- Breezd WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS DRILLING DATA —� TI ywelEa 4S.M— G T rJ VIIw ORtW MGwATER i CErtR vtR a(RM wUC LEVE LEVEL Cre+Chef_ pH uemm. 3" Hard d 4" Power F11Rht* Augers WK bile 8-31 Drill 23 Oct 16: 71' None 3.8' 24 Oct 13:51 5' 1.8' Rig on Dodge Power Wagon " 14:35 to 23' 6j' 3j' Cana:ced: eco r Ccrcaua 24 October 2014 15:20 51' 2.1'^ro 181797v1 BOLL BORING IR%i (continued) 816; 10011' St 5 pmrririt J gfm^`. M Cottrg: r.ro. MR •51)16 PROJECT: LOG OF BORING NO: 1 DEPTH SURFACE ELEVATION! 9g 1 SAMPLE LAB A OTHER TESTS IN GEOLOGY N W8 LL FEET DESL RIPTION AHO CIA SSIFICITION /I' TYPE R W DE pa' LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray tuL Glacial N 9 FA wl tr to a little gravel TI11 22saturated, medium I 23 End of Boring - No Refusal I 24 ore hole void backf Sl led w/ native 25 cuttings mixed w/ Bentonite or. 24 October 2014 j Probe IA - Elev • 97.8 1 2 0-64' Topsoil Fill, Fill CSI leas ' than Boring 1), Buried Humus 1 2 '61'-7' Lean Clay, y 1 y, pose ibl Hart, 30� Cray, saturated, very soft j 7'-8j' Lean Clay, rather silty. Dark 311 Gray, saturated, very soft tc soft Bj'-IOIt' Lean Clap w/ land inclusions 1 32- Dark Gray, saturated, soft tc medium I 33,11 Probe put down by power flight auger j Imethod on 24 October 2014 S ammedw i 34- &rely backfilled w/ native cuttingg mixed w/ Bentonite 3 I 41J I 42 43 44 45 I 46 1817970 B Patrick J Wines, PL c-- - -- - _ - - 6167 iOOP, St ' Cottega Grove HN 5577k PROJECT: _ ADatra LOG FET LOG OF BORING NO: _ SUAFACEELEVATION Tti Ko61SAMPLE LAS A OTHER TESTS DESCRIPTION AND CLASS:FlCAT1ONGECLOG* I( -f PE R I W�-_ � 1 3I � 1 % i Sea: Cl:r[S S�rr., wring O�in � ` ViswJ-canal ardlrr `aScra- cf Sa 3l l 8; tory methods, accrcding to the ' I Ut)fied Soil Clar[ifitation '` S 57.tes, or to 4t)ar s?ate= as \\\ apprapriate ;Ci Fenetrati'n "N" • Value - Stsher t do 1Tt Split -Harrel Sas-i I 1 )=1 plot ere foot 1 Nater gearirg t= Y Sex i f: No -- 1 • hate: 13 j Ln%el s- b;:ia3 Sat, -If Ss-ar- - -- i •• lr'itetra ';,pe l - 5hl :hl Tvtr 0 I L, 1 Ij 0ita as l uceraary 7 � 1 f s' L--_:inrt4rr Coma n a LeTf& rf ir:i1 —Eetnv<red a . Gar =t '- ' Natta ll t'[. Ml ay9al r•!♦TS :A._t'4�OATa ` 1 i tlr'• ie". it ,`9 � _C .l •,� tl .l. 1 � .- e' _—__ ___._ 181797v3 EXHIBIT "C" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT 181797v1 :•1'EFS". TF 7,CM, = Mt 1,34 Fedi. F+fr:E N1 : W �t Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc Patrick I Nines, PE $167 (60•SIS COUSV Gr .MN ssols (612)414.5770 13 November 2014 Mr James Rudav 145x6 Timbcrhill Road Minnetonka MN 5534? Re: Subsurface W Investigation Proposed Single Family Residence W of 2061 W 05" St, Chanhassen, Minn Nc . I - 7N-1 11:' - I 1 his is in response to your contact of recent regarding groundwater on this project. Al you know, I investigated the lot last month and issued a report dated 25 October 2014.1 f rmid a total of T & 81h of unsuitable soil at the locutions of Boring 1 & Probe IA, respectively, in the form of topsoil fill, general and varying fill, buried Original humus and overly soft clay or marl. First suitable base soil is a loose to firm sand or a soft to medium lean clay. I recommended removing these materials and placing controlled fill, noting that you will hate to urrously control groundwater io the process. Regarding groundwater, I found it very high ou this site at a stabilized level of 1.8'. As f understand it, I he City of f'hanhassen has asked if Ilia water level will change as a result of site correction. I used as a stabilized water level the 1.8' found a day after the hank auger phase was completed. l had encountered water while drilling and did achieve the base granular soil that first day. When I did the power auger phase, water was creeping up to nearly the same level a few hours later, so I felt that the 1.8' is valid. I believe that, when you correct this lot, controlling grtnuudwater, and compacting fill, most likely granular, the groundwater will soots rebound to its original level - I.8' as found in my boring. If you construct ordinary and gond site drainage on your finished project, groundwater will not be affected by any artificial recharge the result of your activities. If you have any additional questions or this, of of I can be of assistance in any additional capacity, do not hesitate to uunacr me at your convenience. Sinomly, INl'PRSjT�ATEp GEUrECHN Patrick J Hines. PE President P H/SC �bts atAlE 0'r DyrE�: '.,._ut .,.. 181797vl P 3Y C ri 5 "V CeF:3RCArTJ On -fr-- LA'S C'r r c SIATE Or n I Va'JTA MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT MIN: 1008671-0504161542-5 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., as nominee for the Lender FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB, a federal savings bank, its successors and assigns, which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect Dated this 20 day of 2015. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGI RATION SYSTEMS, INC. BY: , .a STATE OF OF tJ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DAKL-wn ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2015, by U -A- t7ore%^-� the i� t ^ �res,eLn- of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, acting solely as nominee for ,the Lender Flagstar Bank, FSB, a federal savings bank, on its behalf. NOT THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTsoN Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 181797vl myy bn WA to 019 AW4 N O&WW d County, MI Document No. A616942 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Certified Recorded on -September 22, 2015 3:57 PM Fee: $46.00 VIII IIII III IIII III John E Freemyer 616942 County Recorder (—er-dfr recording yr ormaft-) GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT JOHN J. COREY and KE%1BERLY E. COREY, husband and wife, as joint tenants, hereinafter referred to as "Grantors", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant unto the CITY OF CE ANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City", its successors and assigns, forever, a permanent easement for public right-of-way, roadway, drainage and utility purposes over, across, on, under, and through land situated within the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" and depicted on the attached Exhibit `B". INCLUDING the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the easement premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public right-of-way, roadway, drainage and utility systems over, across, on, under, and through the easement premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain, and excavate the easement premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public right-of-way, roadway, drainage and utility systems. The above named Grantors, for themselves, their successors, heirs, and assigns do covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that they are well seized in fee title of the above described easement premises; that they have the sole right to grant and convey the easement to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the easement premises; and that they will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. 179514 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantors hereto have signed this easement this day of 2015 GRANT ly a (t,4 John J. Corey Kitt erl . orey STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF Nn ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Z4 day of .201 S by John J. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey, husband and wife, Grantors. Notary Public ADW4DERJHUSEr NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My COMMISSION EXPIRES 1-31-2018 INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 612 452-5000 AMP/jmo 2 179514 EDIT "A" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT A permanent easement for public right-of-way, roadway, drainage and utility purposes over, under, across and through that part of Lot 3, Block, 2, MOLINE'S ADDITION, according to the recorded Plat thereof, which lies within the circumference of a circle having a radius of 55.00 feet. The center of said circle is the point of intersection of the center line of 651' Street as dedicated in said Plat and the southerly extension of the west line of Lot 3, Block 1, in said plat, Carver County, Minnesota. 179514 EXIM1T "B" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT [Attach Sketch] 4 179514 West 65th .Street BLOCK 2 - _ `nT"gid lt>Y a•1 cyn Eznef'• --' ` -`. _ e_ MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT MIN: 1008671-0504161542-5 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., as nominee for AMERICAN MORTGAGE & EQUITY CONSULTANTS, INC., its successors and assigns, which holds a mortgage on all or part of the property more particularly described in the foregoing Grant of Permanent Easement, which mortgage is dated July 31, 2014, and recorded August 25, 2014, as Document No. 598468 with the office of the County Recorder for Carver County, Minnesota, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby join in, consent, and is subject to the foregoing Grant ofPermanent Easement. Dated this I IP day of April, 2015 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., AS NOMINEE FOR AMERICAN MORTGAGE & EQUITY CONSULTANTS, INC., ITS SUCCESSO$S AND ASST S��G%� By: Elaine Skolnik Vice President STATE OF MICHIGAN ) ) SS. COUNTY OF OAKLAND ) On this I& day of April, 2015, before me, the subscriber, a Notary Public for Oakland County, acting in and for said county, personally appeared Elaine Skolnik who being by me duly swom, did say that she is respectively the Vice President of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation, and he y acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. 71l1 MarieTr Carter - Notary Public My commission expires: 10-5-2019 Oakland County, Michigan MARIE CARTER NOTARY PUBLIC, WAYNE COUNTY, MI My Commission Expires 101050`19 Acting in Oakland County, MI 179514 <,P&A- o � PIN 2-'5- c5�c '" No delinquent taxes and transfer entered: Certificate of Required Real Estate Value () (X ) CRV # 201.E Laurie Davies Carver CountyAuddor-Treasurer By Deputy Document No. A616943 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Certified Recorded on -September 22, 2015 3:57 PM Fee $46.00 tlIIIgI1NIIN (Top 3 Inches reserved for recording data) John E Freemyer County Recorder QUIT CLAIM DEED Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks Individual(s) to Joint Tenants Form 10.3.3 (2013) DEED TAX DUE: $1.65 DATE: FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, John J. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey , spouses married to each other, ("Grantor"), hereby conveys and quitclaims to John J Corey and Kimberly E Corey, ("Grantee"), as joint tenants, real property in County of 1`IH(tXi)e Pft Minnesota, legally described as follows: Carver. Parcel 2: That part of Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies east of the west 97.50 feet, together with easements for drainage and utility purposes over under and across the northerly 10.00 feet, the southerly 10.00 feet; the easterly 5.00 feet, and the westerly 5.00 feet thereof. Abstract property. Check here if all or part of the described real property is Registered (Torrens) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances. Deed Tax of $Iies paid on (Date) Conservation Fee Paid Laurie Davies Carver County Auditor -Treasurer Total consideration for this transfer is less than $500.00. Current taxes on parcel split described within paid as of 9� (Date) Laurie Davies, Carver CourityAuditor-Treasurer (Deputy) rage t of 2 SCANNED Page 2 of 2 Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks Form 10.3.3 Check applicable box: The Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document or has been electronically filed. (If electronically fled, insert WDC number: ). I am familiar with the property described in this instrument and I certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate. State of Minnesota County of Hennepin This instrument was acknowledged before me on�e �x---�rTi �.C�\� , by John J. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey , spouses married to each other *MEKAOTA131118 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: (insert name and address) Executive Title 7400 Metro Blvd, Suite 100 Edina, MN 55439 (sig ure of ar1a1 o�fi/ceII) p Tdie(and ank): NC Y 1GCII ��L p My commission expires: O 1 3 �Z-VCU (�nff✓dayNead TAX STATEMENTS FOR THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE SENT TO: John J Corey and Kimberly E Corey 2061 65th St W, Excelsior, MN 55331 City Clerk's Certification Pursuant to M.S. 272.162 The undersigned hereby certifies: (Check one of the following:) That City subdivision regulations do not apply to this instrument. That the subdivision of land affected by this instrument has been approved by the governing body of the City of Chanhassen. That municipal restrictions on the filing and recording of this Instrument have been waived by a resolution of the governing body of the City of Chanhassen. That this instrument does not comply with municipal subdivision restrictions and the affected land and its assessed valuation should not be divided by the County Auditor. Dated: 5 By epury Chan � Printed Name: Document No. A6169" OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Certified Recorded on -September 22, 2015 3:57 PM Fee: $46.00 VIII 11 111111111111 IIIIIIIIII County Recorder 61 (reserved for recording mfo—aon) GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT JOHN J. COREY and KMBERLY E. COREY, husband and wife, as joint tenants, hereinafter referred to as "Grantors", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant unto the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City", its successors and assigns, forever, a permanent easement for public drainage and utility purposes over, across, on, under, and through land situated within the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" and depicted on the attached Exhibit `B". INCLUDING the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the easement premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public drainage and utility systems over, across, on, under, and through the easement premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain, and excavate the easement premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public drainage and utility systems. The above named Grantors, for themselves, their successors, heirs, and assigns do covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that they are well seized in fee title of the above described easement premises; that they have the sole right to grant and convey the easement to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the easement premises; and that they will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. ,,CANNr-L� 179510 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantors hereto have signed this easement this day of _Z/7 201�� GRANTO 6V L John J. grey Kimberly VCorey STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF Aft, -Pm ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2'� day of 7 . 201 S by John J. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey, husband and wife, Grantors. Notary Public AIEXANOER J HUSE7 NNEOTA MyMW004I81.3140 14 INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 612 452-5000 AMP/jmo 179510 EDIT "A" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT Parcel 1: A permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under, across and through the northerly 10.00 feet; the southerly 10.00 feet; the easterly 5.00 feet; and the westerly 5.00 feet of the west 97.50 feet of Lot 3, Block 2, MOLINE'S ADDITION, according to the plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. Parcel 2: A permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under, across and through the northerly 10.00 feet; the southerly 10.00 feet; the easterly 5.00 feet; and the westerly 5.00 feet of that part of Lot 3, Block 2, MOLINE'S ADDMON, according to the plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies east of the west 97.50 feet thereof. 179510 EDIT'B" TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT [Attach Sketch(s)] 4 179510 1 '� lA '111*A P - 41� I MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT MIN: 1008671-0504161542-5 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., as nominee for AMERICAN MORTGAGE & EQUITY CONSULTANTS, INC., its successors and assigns, which holds a mortgage on all or part of the property more particularly described in the foregoing Grant of Permanent Easement, which mortgage is dated July 31, 2014, and recorded August 25, 2014, as Document No. 598468 with the office of the County Recorder for Carver County, Minnesota, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby join in, consent, and is subject to the foregoing Grant ofPermanent Easement. Dated this I e day of April, 2015 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., AS NOMINEE FOR AMERICAN MORTGAGE & EQUITY CONSULTANTS, INC., ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS By: Elaine Skolnik Vice President STATE OF MICHIGAN ) ) SS. COUNTY OF OAKLAND ) On this 10'h day of April, 2015, before me, the subscriber, a Notary Public for Oakland County, acting in and for said county, personally appeared Elaine Skolnik who being by me duly swom, did say that she is respectively the Vice President of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation, andhgreby acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. A Q MarikD Carter - Notary Public My commission expires: 10-5-2019 Oakland County, Michigan MARIE CARTER NOTARY PUBLIC, WAYNE COUNTY, MI My Commission Expires 10/05/2019 Acting In Oakland County, MI 179510 October 22, 2015 CITY OF MMMSENBruce Lano Twin Cities Self -Storage 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 607 Washington Ave. S., STE 503 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Administration Re: Conditional Use Permit #2014-31 Cold Storage and Warehouse Facility Phone:952.227.1fo0 Fax: 952.2271110 Dear Mr. Lano: Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1160 According to City records, there is a conditional use permit for a cold storage and Fax: 952.227.1190 warehouse facility recorded against your property located at 1875 Flying Cloud Drive. The City must conduct an inspection to ensure the site is in compliance with Engineering val as Phone: 952.227.1160 the conditions of approval, specified in the enclosed Conditional Use Permit dated Fax: 952.227.1170 November 18, 2014. An inspection of the property will take place on Thursday, October 29, 2015. Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 If the site is found to be in compliance, future inspections will occur annually. Fax: 952.227.1110 However, if the site is in violation of the conditions of approval, staff will work with Park & Recreationthe property owner to bring the site into compliance in a timely manner. Annual Phone: 952.227.1120 compliance inspections will be scheduled from the time of compliance. Fax: 952.227.1110 If you have questions or concerns, please contact me prior to the inspection date Recreation Center above, at 952-227-1132 or dingvalson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Sincerely, Fax: 952.227.1404 i Planning �. Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Drew Ingvalson Fax:952.227.1110 Assistant Planner Public Works Enc. 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 g:Vlan\cup iup wap\wmual inspection documemsltwin M ca ulf-srorage\2015 twin cities self storage cas 14-31 inspection notfce.doc Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Website www.d.chanhasserinn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providingfor Todayand Planning for Tomorrow �CANN7 • -0 CMI OF CHANHA ESEN CAR'NTI2 ANTI) BE, NTTIdEPIN COUNTYES, )�TNTESOTA COIdIiMONAL USE FERIYRT #11014-31 1. Pet :nit: Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and with the Amended and Restated Conditional Use Permit 87-2/ Interim Use Permit 92-1 recorded on November 12, 2008, Document No. 491605, and Conditional Use Permit. 87-2/ Interim Use Permit 92-1 recorded with Carve. County on April 23, 1992, Document No. 134346, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants: A Conditional Use Permit for expansion of a cold storage and warehousing facility for a total of 11 storage buildings. 2. Property. The permit is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as shown on the attached Exhibit A. 3. Conditions. The permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a. The 60 parking stalls for vehicle storage shall be confined to the area labeled Building P4. b. The development shall comply with Site Plan 2014-31, plans prepared by Carlson McCain, dated September 5, 2014. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: November 10, 2014 0 CIT Y OF C HANT A SEY- BY:s ` Tom Furlong, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE, OFhUNNT+R OTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARN7ER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this —Z�n day of 2014, by Thomas F,.. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gczhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a !Nlimesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. �' ��nnnnnnMnnM�w�MAF MHEN J. ENGELHARDT Notrdy F ut711rW inn"ots My OW NPIA) €z*k- Jan 31, 2016 '�\iJF 'i�"JS'�6`Ti{1NYt+.y."VOv'ivJya SII COW R0�7P�7q��T�0�OR7 W�Rw710PtY17 IR'10� �4PRRPwR77 �MOR77i.^IOP16�A174 F�7m SHMM TTRB mmnmI$ 2A IAMMRE SUMM 9 Topsm91WPP -Km 4 (P.WUUGRNXMPLW. 4% 1Rffuff ORN=x" \ 49 POR9 rANVSM GW W \ m wffsn A srorsvwrMU 1 00! PRCPO=61OpRWOO10<t �� a mrMaeslananonPur T71®OYLTw11PSWRR 11P171wR6 ?a.6 7 Y1�1 rsfAP.e eaP RfrmMOl.61Q !!17� PMA smalOY®7C71d7NP APPUMT[OMDWAWM a _. _ --- P1771177OT!• _!9— w41H8s' -- Pw1aeP71RPr --_.. 7www OwR40170w IM1O7DR1 PINt4M07P 11107®w _._ P11p1®P T71®OYLTw11PSWRR 11P171wR6 ?a.6 7 Y1�1 rsfAP.e eaP RfrmMOl.61Q !!17� PMA smalOY®7C71d7NP APPUMT[OMDWAWM a CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FAX (952) 227-1110 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE JOB NO. 8/31/15 2014-30 ATTENTION Jean Olson RE: Document Recording TO: Campbell Knutson, PA Grand Oak Office Center 1 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 WE ARE SENDING YOU ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Request ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 7/27/15 Certification form for Resolution 2015-46 1 2/10/15 Quit Claim Deeds 3 ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE For Recording THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return ® For Recording ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO: Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints SIGNED: lilf'r'd' I-IJ2AI)� Ki eu tt, (g52) 227-1107 SCANNED If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notity us at once. CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of Resolution No. 2015-46, "A Resolution Approving Amendments to Conditions of Approval of a Metes and Bounds Subdivision Creating Two Parcels located at 2061 West 65`" Street" dated July 27, 2015 with the original copy on file in my office and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof. Witness my hand and official seal at Chanhassen, Minnesota, this 14`s day of August, 2015. , P, V I&A-1virm. Wx MW Auty Clerk (Top 3 Inches reserved for recording data) QUIT CLAIM DEED Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks Individual(s) to Joint Tenants Form 10.3.3 (2013) DEED TAX DUE: $1.65 DATE: -Z I FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, John J. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey , spouses married to each other, ("Grantor'), hereby conveys and quitclaims to John J Corey and Kimberly E Corey, ("Grantee"), as joint tenants, real property in County of HI&td6MOCK, Minnesota, legally described as follows: Carver, Proposed: Parcel 1: The west 97.50 feet of Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, together with easements for drainage and utility purposes over under and across the northerly 10.00 feet; the southerly 10.00 feet, the easterly 5.00 feet; and the westerly 5.00 feet thereof. Abstract property. Check here if all or part of the described real property is Registered (Torrens) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances. Page 1 of 2 Page 2 of 2 Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks Form 10.3.3 Check applicable box: The Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document or has been electronically filed. (If electronically filed, insert WDC number: ). I am familiar with the property described in this instrument and 1 certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate. State of Minnesota County of Hennepin Grantor This instrument was acknowledged before me on �u �`f 1 � + ��S , by John J. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey , spouses married to each other *AM TKAESDTA 01131118 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: (insert name and address) Executive Title 7400 Metro Blvd, Suite 185 Edina, MN 55439 Title (and Rank): My commission expires: 01 /-S\ ! z G TAX STATEMENTS FOR THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE SENT TO: John J Corey and Kimberly E Corey 2061 65th St W, Excelsior, MN 55331 City Clerk's Certification Pursuant to M.S. 272.162 The undersigned hereby certifies. (Check one of the following!) That City subdivision regulations do not apply to this instrument. That the subdivision of land affected by this instrument has been approved by the governing body of the City of Chanhassen. That municipal restrictions on the fling and recording of this instrument have been waived by a resolution of the governing body of the City of Chanhassen. That this instrument does not comply with municipal subdivision restrictions and the affected land and its assessed valuation should not be divided by the County Auditor. t Dated By eputy hank e c Printed Name^ ^^ ^ f), �� n (Top 3 inches reserved for recording data) QUIT CLAIM DEED Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks Individual(s) to Joint Tenants Form 10.3.3 (2013) DEED TAX DUE: $1.65 DATE: "2- //!� FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, John J. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey , spouses married to each other, ("Grantor'), hereby conveys and quitclaims to John J Corey and Kimberly E Corey, ("Grantee"), as joint tenants, real property in County of R1E1(t10)0PKW Minnesota, legally described as follows: Carver, Parcel 2: That part of Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies east of the west 97.50 feet, together with easements for drainage and utility purposes over under and across the northerly 10.00 feet; the southerly 10.00 feet; the easterly 5.00 feet, and the westerly 5.00 feet thereof. Abstract property. Check here if all or part of the described real property is Registered (Torrens) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances. Page 1 of 2 Page 2 of 2 Minnesota uniform conveyancing Blanks Form 10.3.3 Check applicable box: The Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document or has been electronically filed. (If electronically fled, insert WDC number: ). I am familiar with the property described in this instrument and I certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate. Grantor Joh J. Co ey Kimberl Corey State of Minnesota County of Hennepin This instrument was acknowledged before me onTp�x�Uy" by John J. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey , spouses married to each other ' 1p JET 3IY`D�RVID NETKA K NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA " MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01!311118 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: (insert name and address) Executive Title 7400 Metro Blvd, Suite 100 Edina, MN 55439 (sign ure of anal officer) TdIe (and ank): IVDP(,` h'C- p My commission expires: d I3Z � /C11U (mond✓dap/ ear) TAX STATEMENTS FOR THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE SENT TO: John J Corey and Kimberly E Corey 2061 65th St W, Excelsior. MN 55331 City Clerk's Certification pursuant to M.S. 272.162 The undersigned hereby certifies: (Check one of the following:) That City subdivision regulations do not apply to this instrument. That the subdivision of land affected b they this instrument has been app Y governing body of the City of Chanhassen. That municipal restrictions on the filing and recording of this instrument have been waived by a resolution of the governing body of the City of Chanhassen. That this instrument does not comply with municipal subdivision restrictions and the affected land and its assessed valuation should not be divided by the County Auditor. Dated 8 6y� \ eputy Chan Printed Name: (Top 3 inches reserved for recording data) QUIT CLAIM DEED Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks Individual(s) to Joint Tenants Form 10.3.3 (2013) DEED TAX DUE: $1.65 DATE: FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, John J. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey spouses married to each other, ("Grantor"), hereby conveys and quitclaims to John J Corey and Kimberly E Corey, ("Grantee"), as joint tenants, real property in County of )(p0000iio Minnesota, legally described as follows: Carver, Proposed: Parcel 1: The west 97.50 feet of Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, together with easements for drainage and utility purposes over under and across the northerly 10.00 feet, the southerly 10.00 feet; the easterly 5.00 feet; and the westerly 5.00 feet thereof. Parcel 2: That part of Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, which lies east of the west 97.50 feet, together with easements for drainage and utility purposes over under and across the northerly 10.00 feet, the southerly 10.00 feet; the easterly 5.00 feet, and the westerly 5.00 feet thereof. Abstract property. Check here if all or part of the described real property is Registered (Torrens) together with all hereditaments and appurtenances. Page 1 of 2 Page 2 of 2 Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks Form 10.3.3 Check applicable box: The Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document or has been electronically filed. (If electronically filed, insert WDC number: ). I am familiar with the property described in this instrument and 1 certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate. State of Minnesota County of Hennepin Grantor This instrument was acknowledged before me on RI W`/ �� , by John J. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey , spouses married to each other r— JEREMY DAVID NETKA NOTARYPUBUC-MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01131118 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: (insert name and address) Executive Tltle 7400 Metro Blvd, Suite 185 Edina, MN 55439 (slL=�j U�- g awre of&larjal orflC r) �) Title (and Rank): VW7wT (tel (. My commission expires: o 13 (monWday/year) TAX STATEMENTS FOR THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE SENT TO: John J Corey and Kimberly E Corey 2061 65th St W, Excelsior, MN 55331 City Clerk's Certification Pursuant to M.S. 272.162 The undersigned hereby certifies: (Check one of the following:) That City subdivision regulations do not apply to this instrument. That the subdivision of land affected by this instrument has been approved by the governing body of the City of Chanhassen. That municipal restrictions on the filing and recording of this instrument have been waived by a resolution of the governing body of the City of Chanhassen. That this instrument does not comply with municipal subdivision restrictions and the affected land and its assessed valuation should not be divided by the County 8/311 Auditor. Dated 8 BY 15z Ch Masse Printed Name: 4-3o CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: July 27, 2015 RESOLUTION NO: 201546 MOTION BY: McDonald SECONDED BY: Campion A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF A METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION CREATING TWO PARCELS LOCATED AT 2061 WEST 65TH STREET WHEREAS, John J. and Kimberly E. Corey have requested a subdivision of the property into two lots of 15,165 square feet and 15,159 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council held a public hearing on November 24, 2014, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance and approved Resolution No. 2014-78; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council met on June 8, 2015, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance and approved Resolution No. 2015-35; and WHEREAS, one of the conditions of approval was that the applicant was required to install the sewer and water service to the vacant property (Parcel 2) and submit a $10,000 escrow to ensure that the work was complete and the street properly restored; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the approval, the applicant requested this condition be removed so that the person(s) purchasing and building on the property would be responsible for the installation of the sewer and water service, including the necessary road repair to West 65t, Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby: 1. Rescinds resolutions 2014-78 and 2015-35. 2. Approves the following metes and bounds subdivision of 2061 West 65'd Street (Planning Case #2014-30) for property legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, Carver County, Minnesota: PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCREMONS Pucd 1 The west 97.50 feet of Lot 3. Sion 2 MOLLNFS ADM ON. aaordtnr to the recorded plat thereof. Caner Couwy Mtrmewh opdm with easemean fox &&=It and unhq p rpow oses urda and aaoss the nonhetil 10.00 feet the southery 10 00 fen. the easmh 5 00 feet, and the wesanll- 5 00 feet thereof Parcel 2 That pan of Lot 3. Slod '-. MOUNFS ADDn1OX. Koordmr to the recorded plat thereof Caner Couony hfoxson Qlnch lits eaa of the wee 97 50 feet lord= wph useoon fa dramare and uhSq purposes me tock and saoss the nor&aty 10 00 feet. the soudwh10 00 tett the taNdy 5 00 feet, and the weswsly 5 00 fer. thereof 3. Amends the conditions of approval to the metes and bounds subdivision for property located at 2061 West 65a' Street (legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, Carver County, Minnesota) as follows: a. Metes and bounds subdivision Parcel 1 and Parcel l with the following conditions: Building The existing structure on proposed Parcel l must be provided with sanitary sewer connection — permit required. 2. Proposed Parcel I must be provided with separate sewer and water services (permit required) before a building permit is issued. Engineering 1. The City Attorney shall draft and the developer shall execute a "Grant of Permanent Easement for Public Drainage and Utility Purposes" document. This document shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 2. A roadway, drainage and utility easement must be dedicated over the portion of the existing cul-de-sac within the property and 15 feet beyond the edge of the road. This easement shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 3. Prior to recording the subdivision the developer shall pay the $45 GIS fee: $25 (subdivision) plus $10/parcel 4. Sewer and water hookup charges are due for the now let Parcel 1, a portion of which shall be collected before the metes and bounds subdivision is recorded: . Water: 1 unit x $1,957/unit = $1,957 Sewer: 1 unit x $677/unit = $677 The remainder of the sewer and water hookup charges for Parcel 1 shall be collected with the building permit. 5. If the final subdivision submittals are received after 2015; all fees shall be recalculated based on the rates in effect at that time. 6. A plumbing permit is required for the private storm sewer; the plumbing inspector will inspect the connection to the city storm sewer manhole. 7. On Parcel 1, the proposed home style as required by City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (iii) is a slab -on -grade home. Based on Interstate Geotechnical Engineering's observations, the groundwater elevation is 1.8 feet below the ground elevation of the soil boring. The developer must verify the surface elevation of the boring location to determine the elevation 2 of the groundwater, the lowest floor must be minimum three feet above that elevation per City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (i). 8. Before a building permit is issued for Parcel 1, the water service and sanitary sewer service must be installed. The sanitary sewer is within West 65"' Street, therefore installation of a sanitary sewer service will require cutting into and patching the City street. A Work in Right of Way permit must be obtained before installing the water and sanitary sewer service; an escrow for street repair to ensure that the street is restored shall be part of the permit requirements. The estimated cost of the street repair was $10,000 in 2014. The escrow amount shall be adjusted according to the construction costs at the time the Work in Right of Way permit is issued 9. Approval of the subdivision is contingent upon the applicant or property owner entering into a development contract with the City. 10. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developer's obligations under this Contract. The City shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City's failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. 11. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. 12. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. 13. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developer's request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make as written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. 14. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 15. Assignability. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or both lots. 16. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. 17. Soil Correction. The property owner or his/her contractor shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi -lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. 18. As -Built Lot Surveys. An as -built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as -built lot survey must be prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as - built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as -built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as -built escrow withheld until all work is complete. Environmental Resource Specialist 1. Tree protection fencing will be required around any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading and located at the drip lines of the trees. 2. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with City Code Section 18-61. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City's approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (2'/2) inches caliper, either bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line). The lot purchaser shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways on each lot utilizing a minimum of four (4) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the lot. If these improvements are not in place at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested, a financial guarantee of $750.00 in the form of cash or letter of credit shall be provided to the City. These conditions must then be complied with within two (2) months after the certificate of occupancy issued, except that if the certificate of occupancy is issued between October 1 through May 1 these conditions must be complied with by the following July 1 st. Upon expiration of the time period, inspections will be conducted by City staff to verify satisfactory completion of all conditions. City staff will conduct inspections of incomplete items with a $50.00 inspection fee deducted from the escrow fund for each inspection. After satisfactory inspection, the financial guarantee shall be returned. If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The 4 City may also use the escrowed funds for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. Parks 1. Park fees of $5,800.00 shall be paid for each new single-family lot prior to the recording of the property deed. Plannine Deeds shall be submitted to the city for review and recorded at Carver County for the two parcels. 2. A building permit shall not be issued unless all soil corrections have been completed as indicated in the attached exhibits titled "Subsurface Soil Investigation" dated October 25, 2014 and November 13, 2014. Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the fiill extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 4. Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 505.02, Subd. 1. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 5. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developer represents that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. 6. Compliance with Laws. Ordinances and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: a) City of Chanhassen; b) State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; C) United States Army Corps of Engineers; d) Watershed District(s); e) Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall fiunish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. Water Resource Coordinator 1. Total surface water management fees due prior to recording the property deed are $1,914.55. 2. Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be furnished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 27'b day of July, 2015. ATTEST: T d Gerhardt, City Clerk/Manager YES NO Laufenburger None Campion McDonald Ryan Tjomhom 0 Denny 4fjnburger, Mayor ABSENT None 14-30 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: June 8, 2015 RESOLUTION NO: 2015-35 MOTION BY: Tiornhonm SECONDED BY: McDonald A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF A METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION CREATING TWO PARCELS LOCATED AT 2061 WEST 65TH STREET WHEREAS, John J. and Kimberly E. Corey have requested a subdivision of the property into two lots of 15,165 square feet and 15,159 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council held a public hearing on November 24, 2014, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance and approved Resolution No. 2014-78; and WHEREAS, one of the conditions of approval was that the applicant was required to install the sewer and water service to the vacant property (Parcel 2) and submit a $10,000 escrow to ensure that the work was complete and the street properly restored; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the approval, the applicant requested this condition be removed so that the person(s) purchasing and building on the property would be responsible for the installation of the sewer and water service, including the necessary road repair to West 65`s Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby amends the conditions of approval to the metes and bounds subdivision for property located at 2061 West 651 Street (legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, Carver County, Minnesota) as follows: Building 1. The existing structure on proposed Parcel l must be provided with sanitary sewer connection — permit required. 2. Proposed Parcel 1 must be provided with separate sewer and water services (permit required) before a building permit is issued. Engineering The City Attorney shall draft and the developer shall execute a "Grant of Permanent Easement for Public Drainage and Utility Purposes" document. This document shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 2. A roadway, drainage and utility easement must be dedicated over the portion of the existing cul-de-sac within the property and 15 feet beyond the edge of the road. This easement shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 3. Prior to recording the subdivision the developer shall pay the $45 GIS fee: $25 (subdivision) plus $10/parcel. 4. Sewer and water hookup charges are due for the new let Parcel 1, a portion of which shall be collected before the metes and bounds subdivision is recorded: Water: 1 unit x $1,957/unit = $1,957 Sewer: 1 unit x $677/unit = $677 The remainder of the sewer and water hookup charges for Parcel 1 shall be collected with the building permit. 5. If the final subdivision submittals are received after 2015, all fees shall be recalculated based on the rates in effect at that time. 6. A plumbing permit is required for the private storm sewer; the plumbing inspector will inspect the connection to the city storm sewer manhole. On Parcel 1, the proposed home style as required by City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (iii) is a slab -on -grade home. Based on Interstate Geotechnical Engineering's observations, the groundwater elevation is 1.8 feet below the ground elevation of the soil boring. The developer must verify the surface elevation of the boring location to determine the elevation of the groundwater; the lowest floor must be minimum three feet above that elevation per City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (i). 8. Before a building permit is issued for Parcel 1, the water service and sanitary sewer service must be installed. The sanitary sewer is within West 65th Street, therefore installation of a sanitary sewer service will require cutting into and patching the City street. A Work in Right of Way permit must be obtained before installing the water and sanitary sewer service; an escrow for street repair to ensure that the street is restored shall be part of the permit requirements. The estimated cost of the street repair was $10,000 in 2014. The escrow amount shall be adjusted according to the construction costs at the time the Work in Right of Way permit is issued 9. Approval of the subdivision is contingent upon the applicant or property owner entering into a development contract with the City. 2 10. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developer's obligations under this Contract. The City shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City's failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. 11. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. 12. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be m writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. 13. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developer's request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make as written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. 14. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 15. Assignability. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or both lots. 16. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. 17. Soil Correction. The property owner or his/her contractor shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi -lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. 18. As -Built Lot Surveys. An as -built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as -built lot survey must be prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as - built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as -built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as -built escrow withheld until all work is complete. Environmental Resource Specialist 1. Tree protection fencing will be required around any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading and located at the drip lines of the trees. 2. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with City Code Section 18-61. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City's approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (2'/z) inches caliper, either bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line). The lot purchaser shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways on each lot utilizing a minimum of four (4) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the lot. If these improvements are not in place at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested, a financial guarantee of $750.00 in the form of cash or letter of credit shall be provided to the City. These conditions must then be complied with within two (2) months after the certificate of occupancy issued, except that if the certificate of occupancy is issued between October 1 through May 1 these conditions must be complied with by the following July I st. Upon expiration of the time period, inspections will be conducted by City staff to verify satisfactory completion of all conditions. City staff will conduct inspections of incomplete items with a $50.00 inspection fee deducted from the escrow fiord for each inspection. After satisfactory inspection, the financial guarantee shall be returned. If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The City may also use the escrowed fiords for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. Parks Park fees of $5,800.00 shall be paid for each new single-family lot prior to the recording of the property deed. Plannine Deeds shall submitted to the city for review and recorded at Carver County for the two parcels. 4 2. A building permit shall not be issued unless all soil corrections have been completed as indicated in the attached exhibits titled "Subsurface Soil Investigation" dated October 25, 2014 and November 13, 2014. 3. Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 4. Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 505.02, Subd. 1. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 5. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developer represents that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. 6. Compliance with Laws Ordinances and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: a) City of Chanhassen; b) State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; C) United States Army Corps of Engineers; d) Watershed District(s); e) Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. Water Resource Coordinator 1. Total surface water management fees due prior to recording the property deed are $1,914.55. 2. Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be furnished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 8`h day of June, 2015. ATTEST: 4AJ" / �*-CJ� T6dd Gerhardt, City Clerk/Manager Denny Laufenburger, 94ayor YES NO Laufenburger None Campion McDonald Ryan Tjomhom ABSENT None Chanhassen City Council — July 27, 2015 PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: INVITATION TO NATIONAL NIGHT OUT, TUESDAY, AUGUST 4. Mayor Laufenburger: Good evening and welcome to this council meeting. To those present in the chamber as well as though who may be watching on Cable Channel 8 at home and also for the record all members of the council are present tonight. First of all I would like to make a public announcement. Chanhassen, the city of Chanhassen will be participating in the National Night Out on Tuesday, August 4'� . The Chanhassen fire department, the Carver County Sheriff's office along with city officials and staff will be visiting block parties from 6:00 to 9:00 p.m. Now National Night Out is the ideal event for gathering neighbors. Ideal because this program is meant to be a neighborhood party but also ties in the public safety aspect by reminding residents how they can help to maintain safe neighborhoods. Studies show that neighbors who know each other are more likely to look out for each other, consequently safer environments to live and to raise families. This night especially also gives city officials and law enforcement a chance to get out and talk with citizens. I would like to invite residents to set aside this night to spend time with your neighbors. And last year if I'm not mistaken Mr. Gerhardt we did over 50 National Night Out neighborhoods, is that correct? And you can still register for Chanhassen's event by calling our public safety liaison, Beth Hoiseth and her phone number is 952-227-1610 or simply call city offices and our receptionist will direct you to Beth Hoiseth. National Night Out, great event for the entire community. Let me first deal with an agenda item. Council members are there any modifications to the agenda for this evening's meeting? If not then we will proceed with the agenda as printed. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated June 22, 2015 2. Receive Planning Commission Minutest dated July 7, 2015 3. Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated June 23, 2015 4. Resolution #2015-43: Resolution Accepting Donation from Klein Bank for Senior Center Lifelong Leaming Program 5. Resolution #201544: Approve Easement Agreement with Xcel Energy for City Property PIN No. 251790030 (Bluff Creek Preserve Area Located West of Lake Drive West). 6. Well No. 15 Improvements: a. Approve Xcel Energy Underground Service Contract for Power Extension b. Approve Change Order for Associated Improvements to Meet Department of Health Review H -S6 ---] Chanhassen City Council — July 27, 2015 7. Deleted. 8. Resolution #201545: Powers Pointe: Approve Resolution Accepting Sanitary Sewer Improvements 9. Resolution #2015-46: Approval of Resolution Amending the Metes and Bounds Subdivision of Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, 2061 West 651' Street, Applicant: John Brudas/Owner: John Corey 10. Resolution #2015-47: TH 101 River Crossing: Approve Resolution Extending Temporary Work Hours 11. Resolution #2015-48: Approve Quote for Rice Marsh Trail Replacement from CSAH 101 to Eden Prairie City Limits 12. Resolution #2015-49: Approval of Resolution Accepting a $12,155 Donation from the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community for an Auto Pulse Device for the Fire Department All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: TOUR DE TONKA UPDATE, TIM LITFIN, MINNETONKA COMMUNITY SERVICES. Mayor Laufenburger: Let's begin, we have with us, I would like to invite Tim Litfin to the podium if you wouldn't mind. If you can make room for Mr. Litfin. Tim as a perennial visitor to Chanhassen City Council. He's significantly involved in the Tour de Tonka so Mr. Litfin, welcome. Tim Litfin: Good evening Mr. Mayor, thank you very much. Council members. City staff. Community members. Thank you for having me here tonight. I'm here to talk about Tour de Tonka. A bike ride that proudly comes through Chanhassen every year. It has since year one and this is our tenth annual Tour de Tonka event. It's happening this Saturday, just a few days from now. There's a noise maker going around for everyone there to chime in whenever you feel free. Sorry everyone, I only have like 7 of them. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you. Tim Litfin: Might have another one in here. I'll talk about Tour de Tonka in the past and then move forward to this year. I know you have a busy agenda so I'll go quickly. Mayor Laufenburger: Take your time, we want to hear about this. You have a lot of potential candidates here. 4 SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 -D. / MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner DATE: July 27, 2015 0 - SUBJECT: Approve Resolution Amending Conditions of Approval to Moline's Addition Metes and Bounds Subdivision — Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition — Planning Case #2014-30 On June 8, 2015, the City Council approved a resolution amending the Building Inspections Phone: 952.2271180 conditions of approval for the Moline's Addition Metes and Bounds Subdivision. Fax: 952.227.1190 The incorrect resolution was attached to the report. The only change to this report is a corrected resolution. Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park 6 Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.2271310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a resolution amending the conditions of an approval to Moline's Addition Metes and Bounds Subdivision — Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition as shown in the amended staff report dated June 8, 2015, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council present. On November 24, 2014 the Chanhassen City Council approved a metes and bounds subdivision dividing Lot 3, Block 1, Moline's Addition into Parcels 1 and 2, Block 1, subject to conditions. One of the conditions of approval was that the applicant was required to install the sewer and water service to the vacant property (Parcel 2) and submit a $10,000 escrow to ensure that the work was complete and the street properly restored. Subsequent to the November 24, 2014 meeting, the applicant requested that this condition be removed so that the person(s) purchasing and building on the property would be responsible for the installation of the sewer and water service, including the necessary road repair to West 65`s Street. The staff report has been edited and conditions of approval amended to reflect this change. All new information will appear in bold. ATTACHMENT 1. Resolution. 2. Staff Report dated June 8, 2015 (bold/strikethrough format). g:\plan\2014 planning cams\2014-30 2061 west 65th street metes & bounds\juy 27, executive summary.doc SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: July 27, 2015 RESOLUTION NO: 2015 - MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF A METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION CREATING TWO PARCELS LOCATED AT 2061 WEST 65TH STREET WHEREAS, John J. and Kimberly E. Corey have requested a subdivision of the property into two lots of 15,165 square feet and 15,159 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council held a public hearing on November 24, 2014, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance and approved Resolution No. 2014-78; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council met on June 8, 2015, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance and approved Resolution No. 2015-35; and WHEREAS, one of the conditions of approval was that the applicant was required to install the sewer and water service to the vacant property (Parcel 2) and submit a $10,000 escrow to ensure that the work was complete and the street properly restored; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the approval, the applicant requested this condition be removed so that the person(s) purchasing and building on the property would be responsible for the installation of the sewer and water service, including the necessary road repair to West 65th Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby: 1. Rescinds resolutions 2014-78 and 2015-35. 2. Approves the following metes and bounds subdivision of 2061 West 65rt Street (Planning Case #2014-30) for property legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, Carver County, Minnesota: Parcel 1 The west 97 50 ke of Lot 3. Block 2. MOLN'E'S AMMON. a dtng to the reearded plat thereof. Caner County Afmnesota together %a h rasemenu for druoage and utsbhputposrs ora und" and taus dw nwthak 10 00 feethe southesh 10 00 feet, the nsterir 5 00 feet. and the aestrrk 5 00 fee thereof Pucel _' Thai put of Lot 3, Block 2. MOLN'E S ADDITION, accordutg to the recorded plat thereof Caner Cc m Msmrsoo 0.1tch Lies ran of the west 97 50 fee together with easements for dratoagr and uuhh. purpose over under and across the northerly 16 00 fentthe southerh 10 00 feet, the easterh5 00 fee and the westerly 5 00 ket thertof 3. Amends the conditions of approval to the metes and bounds subdivision for property located at 2061 West 65d' Street (legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, Carver County, Minnesota) as follows: a. Metes and bounds subdivision Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 with the following conditions: Buildine The existing structure on proposed Parcel 2 must be provided with sanitary sewer connection — permit required. 2. Proposed Parcel 1 must be provided with separate sewer and water services (permit required) before a building permit is issued. Engineering The City Attorney shall draft and the developer shall execute a "Grant of Permanent Easement for Public Drainage and Utility Purposes" document. This document shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 2. A roadway, drainage and utility easement must be dedicated over the portion of the existing cul-de-sac within the property and 15 feet beyond the edge of the road. This easement shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 3. Prior to recording the subdivision the developer shall pay the $45 GIS fee: $25 (subdivision) plus $10/parcel. 4. Sewer and water hookup charges are due for the a&w let Parcel 1, a portion of which shall be collected before the metes and bounds subdivision is recorded: Water: 1 unit x $1,957/unit = $1,957 Sewer: 1 unit x $677/unit = $677 The remainder of the sewer and water hookup charges for Parcel 1 shall be collected with the building permit. 5. If the final subdivision submittals are received after 2015, all fees shall be recalculated based on the rates in effect at that time. 6. A plumbing permit is required for the private storm sewer, the plumbing inspector will inspect the connection to the city storm sewer manhole. 7. On Parcel 1, the proposed home style as required by City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (iii) is a slab -on -grade home. Based on Interstate Geotechnical Engineering's observations, the groundwater elevation is 1.8 feet below the ground elevation of the soil boring. The developer must verify the surface elevation of the boring location to determine the elevation 2 of the groundwater; the lowest floor must be minimum three feet above that elevation per City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (i). 8. Before a building permit is issued for Parcel 1, the water service and sanitary sewer service must be installed. The sanitary sewer is within West 65Th Street, therefore installation of a sanitary sewer service will require cutting into and patching the City street. A Work in Right of Way permit must be obtained before installing the water and sanitary sewer service; an escrow for street repair to ensure that the street is restored shall be part of the permit requirements. The estimated cost of the street repair was $10,000 in 2014. The escrow amount shall be adjusted according to the construction costs at the time the Work in Right of Way permit is issued 9. Approval of the subdivision is contingent upon the applicant or property owner entering into a development contract with the City. 10. Tbird Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developer's obligations under this Contract. The City shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City's failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. 11. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. 12. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. 13. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developer's request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make as written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. 14. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 15. Assignability. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or both lots. 16. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. 17. Soil Correction. The property owner or his/her contractor shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi -lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. 18. As -Built Lot Surveys. An as -built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as -built lot survey must be prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as - built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as -built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as -built escrow withheld until all work is complete. Environmental Resource Specialist 1. Tree protection fencing will be required around any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading and located at the drip lines of the trees. 2. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with City Code Section 18-61. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City's approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (2'/2) inches caliper, either bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line). The lot purchaser shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways on each lot utilizing a minimum of four (4) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the lot. If these improvements are not in place at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested, a financial guarantee of $750.00 in the form of cash or letter of credit shall be provided to the City. These conditions must then be complied with within two (2) months after the certificate of occupancy issued, except that if the certificate of occupancy is issued between October 1 through May 1 these conditions must be complied with by the following July 1st. Upon expiration of the time period, inspections will be conducted by City staff to verify satisfactory completion of all conditions. City staff will conduct inspections of incomplete items with a $50.00 inspection fee deducted from the escrow fund for each inspection. After satisfactory inspection, the financial guarantee shall be returned. If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The 4 City may also use the escrowed funds for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. Parks Park fees of $5,800.00 shall be paid for each new single-family lot prior to the recording of the property deed. Plannin¢ 1. Deeds shall be submitted to the city for review and recorded at Carver County for the two parcels. 2. A building permit shall not be issued unless all soil corrections have been completed as indicated in the attached exhibits titled "Subsurface Soil Investigation" dated October 25, 2014 and November 13, 2014. 3. Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 4. Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 505.02, Subd. 1. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 5. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developer represents that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. 6. Compliance with Laws. Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: a) City of Chanhassen; b) State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; c) United States Army Corps of Engineers; d) Watershed District(s); e) Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. 7. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. Water Resource Coordinator 1. Total surface water management fees due prior to recording the property deed are $1,914.55. 2. Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be furnished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 27th day of July, 2015. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Clerk/Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY OF CHANHA3SEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.22T1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952,22T1 140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.2271110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner DATE: November 24, ^^' ^ June 8, 2015 SUBJ: Moline's Addition Metes and Bounds Subdivision Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition -Planning Case #2014-30 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a metes and bounds subdivision creating two lots subject to the conditions of the staff report and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council present. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting metes and bounds subdivision approval to divide 30,324 square feet into two lots. City council may approve a metes and bounds subdivision of a lot into two lots inside the urban services area if both resulting lots meet the minimum requirements of the zoning ordinance and abut an existing public street, pursuant to Section 18-37 (b) of the Chanhassen City Code. PROPOSAL SUMMARY Request for a metes and bounds subdivision of 30,324 square feet (0.69 acres) into two (2) lots on property zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF) and legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition (2061 West 65`s Street). Applicant: JMBC — James Brudos 14846 Timber Hills Road Minnetonka, MN 55345 (612)855-4949 Jmbrudoscompanv(a)gmail.com Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Todayand Planning for Tomorrow Todd Gerhardt 2061 West 65th Street Metes & Bounds Subdivision '"`_.r-"�1-5June 8, 2015 Page 2 of 12 Owner: John Corey 6409 Oxbow Bend Chanhassen, MN 55317 (612)221-8923 Coreyonel994@gmail.com The site contains a single-family home which is proposed to remain. Access to the site is gained via West 651s Street. The site contains a low area along the southwest corner of the property. There is a septic mound west of the existing single-family home that is proposed to be removed. There are some mature trees on the site. The majority of the trees are proposed to remain undisturbed. L•. West 65th Street :OL ' 3 BLOCK Irl Todd Gerhardt 2061 West 65th Street Metes & Bounds Subdivision #A* '� �`�Wune 8, 2015 Page 3 of 12 The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property and locate a single-family home on the westerly portion of the site. The proposed subdivision meets city ordinance requirements and staff is recommending approval subject to the conditions of this staff report. BACKGROUND The Moline's Addition plat was filed with Carver County on December 29, 1969. The existing home was built in 1981. No other records exist. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article XII, "RSF" Single -Family Residential District LAND USE: Residential Low Density (1.2 — 4.0 units per net acre) The applicant is requesting a metes and bounds subdivision creating two lots. The net density of the development is 2.8 units per acre. Both parcels meet all the lot area, width and depth requirements. Parcel 2, which contains a single-family home, will have a total hard surface coverage of 24%. The city code allows up to 25%. The existing structure meets all required setback requirements. EASEMENTS y MOLINE'S ADDITION a s ' rmras� -- n N cot 65th Street I . i I , -I OF ion? - TF Joan I I The developer proposes 10 -foot front and rear yard and 5 -foot side yard drainage and utility easements on each lot, as shown on the plans. The City Attorney shall draft and the developer shall execute a "Grant of Permanent Easement for Public Drainage and Utility Purposes" document. This document shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. Todd Gerhardt 2061 West 65'h Street Metes & Bounds Subdivision ,,,r^.' "'�o� 26,-204-SJune 8, 2015 Page 4 of 12 A roadway, drainage and utility easement must be dedicated over the portion of the existing cul- de-sac within the property and 15 feet beyond the edge of the road. Prior to recording the subdivision the developer shall pay the $45 GIS fee: $25 (subdivision) plus $10/parcel. STREETS The proposed subdivision is adjacent to West 650' Street, a 25 -foot wide public street within a 60 -foot wide right of way without curb and gutter. This street was constructed in 1979 and was overlaid in 2013. The current standard for new streets within Chanhassen is 31 feet wide with curb and gutter. Staff does not recommend that the developer install curb and gutter along the property frontage since the remainder of the roadway would remain a rural section. UTILITIES There is one sewer and one water service within West 65th Street that provides service to the existing home. The developer pFepeses to install a new sewer- sentiee to the existing heme. reqtArv.di. Th qesiffity em be released w the eity detemlines that the pateh is in good Currently there is no water service or sanitary sewer service to Parcel 1. The proposed locations of the services are shown on the utility plan as a reference; the developer will not be installing the water service or the sanitary sewer service. Before a building permit is issued for Parcel 1, the water service and sanitary sewer service must be installed. The sanitary sewer is within West 65th Street, therefore, installation of a sanitary sewer service will require cutting into and patching the city street. A Work in Right of Way permit must be obtained before installing the water and sanitary sewer service; an escrow for street repair to ensure that the street is restored shall be part of the permit requirements. The estimated cost of the street repair was $10,000 in 2014. The escrow amount shall be adjusted according to the construction costs at the time the Work in Right of Way permit is issued. Sewer and water hookup charges are due for the new lot, a portion of which shall be collected before the metes and bounds subdivision is recorded: Water: 1 unit x $1,886 $1,957/unit = $1-,886 $1,957 Sewer: 1 unit x 5664 $677/unit = $664$677 Todd Gerhardt 2061 West 65d' Street Metes & Bounds Subdivision Ntay-26,�.3June 8, 2015 Page 5 of 12 If the metes and bound subdivision is recorded after December 31, 2015, the partial sewer and water hook-up rates in effect at that time shall be collected. The remainder of the water and sewer hookup fees shall be paid with the building permit at the rate in effect at that time. GRADING & EROSION CONTROL Surface water currently drains from the back to the front of the property. The developer proposes grading on Parcel 1; Parcel 2 with the existing home will not be altered. The developer will install a private storm sewer system on the Parcel 1 and grade the property so that surface runoff will not leave the site. The proposed private storm sewer system will connect to the city storm sewer in front of Parcel 1. A plumbing permit is required for the private storm sewer; the plumbing inspector will inspect the connection to the city storm sewer manbole. There is evidence of high groundwater conditions in the area: Infiltration into a sanitary sewer manhole in the area. The infiltration was abated with the 2013 street project. 2. Site investigation performed in 1980 by Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. (attached) indicated mottled soils on the property 18 inches below the surface. Mottled soils are indicative of periodic soil saturation. 3. Site investigation performed in 1981 by Subterranean Engineering, Inc. (attached) indicating presence of water during borehole drilling, rising to 2.6 feet below the ground surface. 4. Site investigation performed by Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc on October 25, 2014. On Parcel I the proposed home style as required by City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (iii) is a slab - on -grade home. Based on Interstate Geotechnical Engineering's observations, the groundwater elevation is 1.8 feet below the ground elevation of the soil boring. The developer must verify the surface elevation of the boring location to determine the elevation of the groundwater; the lowest floor must be minimum three feet above that elevation per City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (i). Interstate Geotechnical Engineering recommendations include removal of some of the material found on the site and placement of controlled fill. On November 13, 2014 Interstate Geotechnical Engineering provided a follow-up letter with a professional opinion that the groundwater elevation will return to its original level after the soil corrections are completed on the lot. Todd Gerhardt 2061 West 65"' Street Metes & Bounds Subdivision "' a-'�',3June 8, 2015 Page 6 of 12 PARKS AND RECREATION The proposed subdivision is located within an area that is in the municipal park service boundaries of Pheasant Hill Park and the Minnetonka Middle School West Campus. The property has access to the city's comprehensive trail system located on Galpin Boulevard. In lieu of parkland dedication or trail construction, the development shall pay full park fees in force for the one new lot at the time of subdivision approval. Parks fees for 2014 are $5,800.00 per single-family lot. LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION The applicant did not submit tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations. Estimated calculations are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands).....................30,324 SF Baseline canopy coverage..........................................26% or 8,160 SF Minimum canopy coverage allowed ..........................30% or 9,097 SF Proposed tree preservation.........................................25% or 7,720 SF The applicant does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed; therefore, the difference between the baseline and proposed tree preservation is multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required replacement plantings: Difference in canopy coverage ..................................1,377 SF Multiplier...................................................................1.2 Total replacement .......................................................1,652 SF Total number of trees to be planted ...........................1 tree The total number of trees required for the development is one. There are no bufferyard requirements for this subdivision. 0i4iej 311J —I"- 01311111K A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits can be issued. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. COMPLIANCE TABLE Areas . ft Width ft Depth ft Setbacks Code 15,000 90 125 Front /Rear 30' Sides 10' Parcell 15,165 97.50 155.5 30/30/10/10 Parcell 15,159 97.50 155.5 30/30/10/10 Total 30,324 Todd Gerhardt 2061 West 650' Street Metes & Bounds Subdivision 'r^"'=._ `�,'^o13June 8, 2015 Page 7 of 12 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council approve the subdivision creating two lots subject to the following conditions and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. Buildine 1. The existing structure on proposed Parcel l must be provided with sanitary sewer connection — permit required. 2. P-reperiies Proposed Parcel 1 must be provided with separate sewer and water services (permit required) before a building permit is issued. 3. Exisfing Subsuffaee Sewage Tr-eatmeR4 Site on proposed Pareel 1 most be prepeA Engineerin¢ 1. The City Attorney shall draft and the developer shall execute a "Grant of Permanent Easement for Public Drainage and Utility Purposes" document. This document shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 2. A roadway, drainage and utility easement must be dedicated over the portion of the existing cul-de-sac within the property and 15 feet beyond the edge of the road. This easement shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 3. Prior to recording the subdivision the developer shall pay the $45 GIS fee: $25 (subdivision) plus $10/parcel. 4. Prior to r-eeording the subdiNision a $ 10,000 seetnity must be provided te ensure 5• J The securityBanb Feleased h the eity deteFmines4i. t the .., teh is - 5. Sewer and water hookup charges are due for the new le Parcel 1, a portion of which shall be collected before the metes and bounds subdivision is recorded: Water: 1 unit x $1,886 $1,957/unit = $1,886 $1,957 Sewer: 1 unit x $664 $677/unit = $664$677 The remainder of the sewer and water hookup charges for Parcel 1 shall be collected with the building permit. 6. If the final subdivision submittals are received after 2414 2015, all fees shall be recalculated based on the rates in effect at that time. Todd Gerhardt 2061 West 65'h Street Metes & Bounds Subdivision a.r,... 2c gni c ..r une 8, 2015 Page 8of12 8. A plumbing permit is required for the private storm sewer; the plumbing inspector will inspect the connection to the city storm sewer manhole. 9. On Parcel 1, the proposed home style as required by City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (iii) is a slab -on -grade home. Based on Interstate Geotechnical Engineering's observations, the groundwater elevation is 1.8 feet below the ground elevation of the soil boring. The developer must verify the surface elevation of the boring location to determine the elevation of the groundwater; the lowest floor must be minimum three feet above that elevation per City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (i). 10. Before a building permit is issued for Parcel 1, the water service and sanitary sewer service must be installed. The sanitary sewer is within West 651h Street, therefore installation of a sanitary sewer service will require cutting into and patching the City street. A Work in Right of Way permit must be obtained before installing the water and sanitary sewer service; an escrow for street repair to ensure that the street is restored shall be part of the permit requirements. The estimated cost of the street repair was $10,000 in 2014. The escrow amount shall be adjusted according to the construction costs at the time the Work in Right of Way permit is issued 11. Approval of the subdivision is contingent upon the applicant or property owner entering into a development contract with the City. 12. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developer's obligations under this Contract. The City shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City's failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. 13. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. 14. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. 15. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developer's request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make as written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. Todd Gerhardt 2061 West 65'" Street Metes & Bounds Subdivision 'May bate 6, 241-SJune 8, 2015 Page 9 of 12 16. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 17. Assienability. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or both lots. 18. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. 19. Soil Correction. The property owner or his/her contractor shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi -lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. 20. As -Built Lot Surveys. An as -built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as -built lot survey must be prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as -built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as -built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as -built escrow withheld until all work is complete. Environmental Resource Specialist 1. Tree protection fencing will be required around any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading and located at the drip lines of the trees. Todd Gerhardt 2061 West 650' Street Metes & Bounds Subdivision mune 8, 2015 Page 10 of 12 3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with City Code Section 18-61. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City's approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (2'h) inches caliper, either bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line). The lot purchaser shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways on each lot utilizing a minimum of four (4) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the lot. If these improvements are not in place at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested, a financial guarantee of $750.00 in the form of cash or letter of credit shall be provided to the City. These conditions must then be complied with within two (2) months after the certificate of occupancy issued, except that if the certificate of occupancy is issued between October 1 through May 1 these conditions must be complied with by the following July 1st. Upon expiration of the time period, inspections will be conducted by City staff to verify satisfactory completion of all conditions. City staff will conduct inspections of incomplete items with a $50.00 inspection fee deducted from the escrow fund for each inspection. After satisfactory inspection, the financial guarantee shall be returned. If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The City may also use the escrowed funds for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. Parks 1. Park fees of $5,800.00 shall be paid for each new single-family lot prior to the recording of the property deed. Plannine 1. Deeds shall submitted to the city for review and recorded at Carver County for the two parcels. 2. A building permit shall not be issued unless all soil corrections have been completed as indicated in the attached exhibits titled "Subsurface Soil Investigation" dated October 25, 2014 and November 13, 2014. 3. Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the Todd Gerhardt 2061 West 65's Street Metes & Bounds Subdivision May,1`�.`SJune 8, 2015 Page 11 of 12 City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 4. Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 505.02, Subd.1. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 5. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developer represents that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. 6. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: a) City of Chanhassen; b) State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; c) United States Army Corps of Engineers; d) Watershed District(s); e) Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. 7. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. Water Resource Coordinator 1. Total surface water management fees due prior to recording the property deed are $1,914.55. 2. Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be furnished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Decision. 2. Resolution with attachments. 3. Development Review Application. 4. Reduced Copy Existing Conditions Survey. 5. Reduced Copy Lot Split Exhibit. 6. Reduced Copy Grading & Erosion Control Plan. 7. Reduced Copy Utility Plan. 8. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List. Todd Gerhardt 2061 West 65th Street Metes & Bounds Subdivision "'`^ n.1une 8, 2015 Page 12 of 12 9. Soil Percolation report from Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. dated September 2, 1980. 10. Soil Investigation report from Subterranean Engineering, Inc. dated June 29, 1981. 11. Subsurface Soil Investigation Letters from Patrick J. Hines, PE, President of Interstate Geotechnical Engineering Inc. dated October 25, 2014 and November 13, 2014. 12. Correspondence from: a. Chris Jerdee dated September 26, 2014. b. Terry Atherton dated October 27, 2014 c. Bill and Judy Ashenbach dated October 29, 2014 gAplant2014 planning cases\2014-30 2061 west 65th street metes & bomds\staff reportldoc 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION R IAA Application of John J. and Kimberly E. Corey for Subdivision approval. On November 24, 2014 the Chanhassen City Council met at it's regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of John J. and Kimberly E. Corey for a metes and bounds subdivision approval to create two lots. The City Council conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The City Council heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential District, RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Low Density uses. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition. 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this subdivision ordinance; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. 5. The planning report #2014-30 dated November 24, 2014, prepared by Sharmeen Al-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. DECISION The City Council approves the metes and bounds subdivision creating two lots. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 24`s day of November, 2014. CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL M Mayor 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: November 24, 2014 MOTION BY: RESOLUTION NO: 2014 - SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION CREATING TWO PARCELS AT 2061 WEST 65th STREET WHEREAS, John J. and Kimberly E. Corey have requested a subdivision of the property into two lots of 15,165 square feet and 15,159 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council held a public hearing on November 24, 2014, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby approves the metes and bounds subdivision of 2061 West 65rd Street (Planning Case #2014-30) for John J. and Kimberly E. Corey for property legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: Buildine The existing structure on proposed Parcel 2 must be provided with sanitary sewer connection — permit required. 2. Properties must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 3. Existing Subsurface Sewage Treatment Site on proposed Parcel 1 must be properly discontinued and abandoned — permit required. Engineerin¢ The City Attorney shall draft and the developer shall execute a "Grant of Permanent Easement for Public Drainage and Utility Purposes" document. This document shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 2. A roadway, drainage and utility easement must be dedicated over the portion of the existing cul-de-sac within the property and 15 feet beyond the edge of the road. Prior to recording the subdivision the developer shall pay the $45 GIS fee: $25 (subdivision) plus $10/parcel. 4. Prior to recording the subdivision a $10,000 security must be provided to ensure that the street is restored. The security can be released when the city determines that the patch is in good condition after one freeze -thaw cycle. 5. Sewer and water hookup charges are due for the new lot, a portion of which shall be collected before the metes and bounds subdivision is recorded: Water: 1 unit x $1,886/unit = $1,886 Sewer: 1 unit x $664/unit = $664 6. If the final subdivision submittals are received after 2014, all fees shall be recalculated based on the rates in effect at that time. 7. The remaining 70% of the sanitary sewer and water hookup fees must be paid with the building permit at the rate in effect at that time. 8. A plumbing permit is required for the private storm sewer; the plumbing inspector will inspect the connection to the city storm sewer manhole. 9. On Parcel 1, the proposed home style as required by City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (iii) is a slab -on -grade home. Based on Interstate Geotechnical Engineering's observations, the groundwater elevation is 1.8 feet below the ground elevation of the soil boring. The developer must verify the surface elevation of the boring location to determine the elevation of the groundwater; the lowest floor must be minimum three feet above that elevation per City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (i). Environmental Resource Specialist 1. Tree protection fencing will be required around any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading and located at the drip lines of the trees. 2. Parcel 1 is required to have one tree planted in the front yard. Parks Park fees of $5,800.00 shall be paid for each new single-family lot prior to the recording of the property deed. Plannine Deeds shall submitted to the city for review and recorded at Carver County for the two parcels. 2. A building permit shall not be issued unless all soil corrections have been completed as indicated in the attached exhibits titled "Subsurface Soil Investigation" dated October 25, 2014 and November 13, 2014. K Water Resource Coordinator 1. Total surface water management fees due prior to recording the property deed are $1,914.55. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 20 day November of 2014. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Clerk/Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor YES NO ABSENT Instate Geotechnical Engineerin#nc Patrick J Hines, PE 8167 loo'" St S Cottage Grove MN 55016 (612)414-5770 25 October 2014 Mr James Rudos 14846 Timber Hill Road Minnetonka MN 55345 Re: Subsurface Soil Investigation Proposed Single Family Residence W of 2061 W 65a St, Chanhassen, Minn CITY0FCHANHASSEt RECEIVED NOV 0 4 2014 ""O"8Z PLANNING om In accordance with your authorization, I have completed the above referenced investigation to determine site suitability for the proposed construction. A summary of my findings together with boring logs and my conclusions and recommendations are presented in the enclosed report. I found, as you already have been briefed, more than usual problems with the site. There is a total of 5/4'& 0/4 at the locations of Boring 1 & Probe 1A, respectively, of unsuitable soil in the form of topsoil fill, general and varying fill, and buried original humus. Below at first is a low sand content lean clay, generally dark in color, saturated, very soft to soft (w/ depth). It is "normally consolidated" (consolidated enough to only support its own weight, not additional weight of fill soils or structures above). The overburdening fill has not been inplace long enough to force further consolidation. The moisture content test in this material indicated nearly 42%, high for a lean clay. This material extends only from 53/4 to 7' in Boring 1, but from 61/4 to 83/Z in Probe IA. The first 9" of this material in Probe IA is very soft and is a borderline marl material. All of the aforementioned materials are unsuitable for structure support should be removed. I do acknowledge that excavators are often reluctant to excavate further once the buried organic soil is cleared, so understandings should be inplace at the time of gathering bids. Base soil below at first is a lean clay, a little sandy, dark gray, saturated, rather soft to medium. It has inclusions of a poorly graded (biased finer grained) sand with a few fines, also dark gray, saturated, loose to firm. Deepest soil, commencing at 11' in Boring 1, is a lean clay, rather sandy, dark gray, low gravel content, medium. Theses materials are glacial till. The sand inclusions in the upper portion are glacial outwash. All of these base mineral soils are suitable for residential construction, with conditions. Refusal to auger advancement was not encountered by boring termination depth of 23', indicating lack of bedrock to this level. Very importantly, groundwater was found in the main Boring at 1.8' (elev 96'/4±). It is aquifer groundwater, but marginally so. It appears to be contained primarily in the sand inclusions at 7'+. But it also is coming from the upper soft and very soft clay, possibly from SCANNED 0 0 Mr James Rudos 25 October 2014 Page 2 the lower organic soil. Proper construction on the site (removing the softer lean clay, promoting good site drainage) will mitigate some of this. Thus, water found presently can be regarded as a maximum level. Slab grade of the proposed residence should be set in accordance with City requirements utilizing this level. I recommend complete removal of all unsuitable soil which is likely to be the fill and buried organic soil as encountered plus the overly soft clay found in both the boring and probe. While this amounts only to another V/4 in the vicinity of Boring 1, it is another 2'+ in the vicinity of Probe 1A. As indicated, excavators may be reluctant to excavate below organic soil level, but it is necessary (see longer discussion in the report). It is so important that full time inspection of the excavation by a soils engineer may be necessary. Of course, other zones of unsuitable soil not represented by the boring and probe could still be encountered due to the nature of small volume random sampling. Any other depths or zones of unsuitable soil should be removed as well. You could lower footings somewhat so that you have to provide less oversizing and not stray onto the neighbor's property. But footings here should not be lowered so much as to rest directly upon the suitable base soil as it is only marginally suitable. You need a little fill (2' is recommended) to spread footing loads out with depth. Footings maybe generally designed allowing the usual 2000 psf foundation bearing capacity, which will likely result in normal strip or pad footings. Special attention is again drawn to the advisory that excavations be examined by the Soils Engineer to verify soil boring results and to document adequacy of site preparation. Again this is very important as how much soft/very soft clay must be removed will require a high degree of field judgment. Fill, as used, should be tested for compaction adequacy. Soil correction should not be abated below slabs in any manner (ie, do not let the excavator try to "trench around" slab areas). Thank you for the opportunity to have been of service. If you have any questions on this, or if I can be of assistance in any additional capacity, do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, TATE GE-OTECFINICAL ENGINEERING, Inc a 'ck J mes, PE President enclosures pIVSC SOIL BORING LOG r Patrick J Hines, PE 8167 100th St S ' - Cotta¢e Crnva MN 5507! Proposad Single Family Residence — V PROJECT: West of 2061 W 6'5th St Chanhassen, Minn NO: i LOG OF BORING _ DEN " SURFACE ELEVATION-. 98.1 GEOLOGY N WB SAMPLE LAB FEET DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION Topsoil TYPE R W DE (LEAN CLAY, Tariably sandy, Organic (OL 1 Black, w/ tr s mineral Soil, Fill N 1 HA i very moist, loose to firm rOTHEITESTS Fill � '+)2 I JAY' somewhat sandy, Prod Dark Gray (C ' 2 w/ a.little Organic Soil, w/ tr grave ( HA moist to ve moist, loose to firm ` 3 LEAN CLAY, rather silty, Organic (OL) Buried 3 HA II` Black, w/ small roots, tr's undecom- Humus 4 posed vegetation, saturated, rather I borderline Sapric Peat in soft 1 j I 5 er ortion i 5.756 sl lighter, less organic, w/ de th LEAN 1Dark a tt a Ian y, eryDark to Gray (CL), Lacustrine Y 4 HA 41.9 ' very soft to soft (w/ Deposit , `,- s' depth) 7} poor a re y gra amine gr, w Imed, tr cs); w/ a few fines, bark Gray Glacial 5 8/13 I F3 + (SP);'saturated, loose to firm Ibanded `inclusion Till Till, w/1Y Outwa 1 Y 6 FA 25.6 ' w/ LEAN CLAY, a little sandy, 9- Dark Gray (CL), saturated, rather soft) soft to medium @ 8}'+ 10 more bands of clay, less of sand, w/ depth ' 11 Glacial N 7 FA LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray 12 (CL), w/ a little gravel Till i saturated, medium 13 14� I I I 15 I� 1 I N 8 FA 16' I I 17= 1 18 19 20- 21- I 0�5 (rnnf-1niiPfj (24t") 70�!B+ SW M5stly mph± Breeze C, on next sheet) WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS DRILLING a DATA er: Cht) C1ear, 70°F±,lear Calm IY SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLING WATEA DER7M DEiTN DEPTN YUD LEVE LPVEL Crew Chief__ pH:29 7 ' None 3.8' Method: 3" Hand S 4" Power Flight* Augers *Mobile B-31 DrillRig on Dodge Power Wagon tOct 3:51 5' 1.8' .35 to 23' 6 ' '3} Cc�nced: 23 Octo er :20 5}' 2.1' BonngCDnpieted: 24 October 2014 _ -BOIL BORING LOU (continued) Parrirk J fflwa. g Pit 816; 100t4 St S Cott^z- r+n.ia MN 45016' Proposed Single Family Residence PROJECT: West of 2061 65th St,Chanhassen, Minn LOG OF BORING NO: 1 DEPTH SURFACE ELEVATION: 98.1 SAMPLE LAB 6 OTHER TESTS IN GEOLOGY N W8L L FEET DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION #/ TYPE R W DE P.L. LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray (CL Glacial N 9 FA w/ tr to a little gravel Till 22 saturated, medium 23 End of Boring - No Refusal 24 Bore hole void backfilled w/ native 25 cuttings mixed w/ Bentonite on 24 October 2014 26 27 �- Probe 1A - Elev - 97.8 2 0-6V Topsoil Fill, Fill (Sl less 29 than Boring 1), Buried Humus y;r 6}'-7' Lean Clay, possibly Marl,-- 30 Gray, saturated, very soft 1 1 7'-81' Lean Clay, rather silty, Dark %Grey, saturated, vel soft to I ---sof = t 8}'-10}' Lean Clay. w/ band inclusion`s, 32 Dark Gray, saturated, soft to medium 33 Probe put down by power flight auger method on 24 October 2014 6 ummeda•- A 34 ately backfilled w/ native cuttings � 3J mixed w/ Bentonite 36 371 38- 39- 3 40- 441 41 I I 42 43 441 y5�1 461 I i FROM : INTERSTRTE GEOTECHNICAL PHONE NO. : 651 769 2467 • Nb . 13 2014 11:05AM P2 Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc Patrick J Hines, PF, 8167 100a St S Cuttagc Orae MN 55016 (612) 414.5770 13 November 2014 Mr James Rudos 14846 Timberhill Road Minnetonka MIN' 55345 Re: Subsurface Soil Investigation Proposed Single Family Residence W of 2061 W 65t° St, Chanhassen, Minn This is in response to your contact of recent regarding groundwater on this project. As you know, I investigated the lot last month and issued a report dated 25 October 2014, I found a total of 7 & 8'12 of unsuitable soil at the locations of Boring 1 & Probe IA, respectively, in the form of topsoil fill, general and varying fill, buried original humus and overly soft clay or marl. First suitable base soil is a loose to :firm sand or a soft to medium lean clay. I recommended removing these materials and placing controlled fill, noting that you will have to seriously control groundwater in the process_ Regarding groundwater, I found it very high on this site - at a stabilized level of 1.8'. As I understand it, The City of Chanhassen has asked if this water level will change as a result of site correction. I used as a stabilized water level the 1.8' found a day after the hand auger phase was completed. I had encountered water while drilling and did achieve the base granular soil that first day. When I did the power auger phase, water was creeping up to nearly the same level a few hours later, so I felt that the 1.8' is valid. I believe that, when you correct this lot, controlling groundwater, and compacting fill, most likely granular, the groundwater will soon rebound to its original level -1.8' as found in my boring. If you construct ordinary and good site drainage on your finished project, groundwater will not be affected by any artificial recharge the result of your activities. If you have any additional questions on this, or if I can be of assistance in any additional capacity, do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, INTERSTATE GEOTECHNI,IIQEERIIVG, Inc c% J- Nit, IPESEBY CEilIri TAT 1!?:S PL%'%SAEOI ;CA'P.GN 0R Opt ceNC` F8 �.. g;r,c nl:._r3^S•. -rn ^r, C'iV n- eo P,crwiiT l v r .•r ! Vic v;u U,a ", ;o„ T Patrick J Hines, PE "T !,1( I X1':9 A : U _Y LICWti,icD MO! SSIONAL a tzsas s NEE ili'' 1 Tii LAWS OF THE STATE OF iv NNESOTA resident > p1 $TATE pIi/SC �`.+ (ON n4�n6`V DATE• 13 &,i '(Y MINiNESOTAREGAO. 12.d" COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT�� Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55335P 5P 2 6 204 CITY OF CHA NSEN Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 CW MAS ENPUNNINGDEPT APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Date Filed: 60 -Day Review Deadline: Planner: C,_\ Case Section•• • •-apply) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment .........................$600 ] Subdivision ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ...... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Single -Family Residence.................................$325 ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 ❑ Rezoning ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD)...................$750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................$100 ❑ All Others .........................................................$500 ❑ Sign Plan Review...................................................$150 ❑ Site Plan Review ❑ Administrative ..................................................$100 ElCommerciai/Industrial Districts` ......................$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area 'Include number of existing employees: and number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts.........................................$500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit ❑ Create 3 lots or less.........................................$300 ❑ Create over 3 lots ...................... $600 + $15 per lot Metes & Bounds ........................ $300 + $50 per lot Consolidate Lots.............................................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑ Final Plat' ........................................................$250 'Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way...................$300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Variance...............................................................$200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Single -Family Residence...............................$150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ......................................................$100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment............................$500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES: ElNotification Sign .................................................. $200 TOTAL FEES: $ (City to install and remove) _ 7� ® Property Owners' List within 500'......... $3 per addressy'YJ Received from'J nyn v\ is"rrJ (City to generate - fee determined at pre -application meeting) �j Escrow for Recording Documents.. $50 per document k3 Daie Received. q -� el,- I� Check Number: G, I C) R (CUP/SPRNACNARNVAP/Metes & Bounds Subdivision) Project Name: 2061 We,5+ 65+(-\ 9reer Property Address or Location: 2061 ityes f 65-+i. S4 dee � Parcel#:�25-5360NDLegalDescription: Loi3� 6/ockZ,Mo/,16 AJJ-+:or Totat Acreage: 303 Z -f Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes ONo Present Zoning: KS F Requested Zoning: /LS F Present Langl Use Designation: �aS- Low , tt quested Land Use Designation: c- - W Existing Use of Property: (ZS F Description of Proposal: _7h�wo,) IJ like +c, Sl21, f ;,fij fti'lo lots ❑ Check box if separate narrative is attached APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Address: 7',,-nber I I jS Contact: 'T'le es Qrudo-S Phone: City/State/Zip: A7AI _5_Y3`15- Cele 612 4ss-�f9Y`1 Email: ++n lJrl�oloSC�m n en j - Con Fax: (goad way Signature City/State/Zip: Wq I Zqt c Date: p PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. 1 further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: jo�-N CJr Address: 6YOq Bend City/State/Zip: C6gn410tSSen /nAl sS317 Email: Signatt Contact: S'011^ co Phone: 12 ZZ(-? -3 Cell: Fax: Date: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable)) Name: So�-r-�,re-Q,or5!zVesf Contact: gory S I/7s el rPr� Address: /s -O So(A (goad way Phone:19SZ 976 —600Q City/State/Zip: Wq I Zqt c At 5-53 Cell: 46/2) ✓ �;OZ_ 3Z Z Z Email: !'O(� S4 ihr e. �' ^ Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: ❑ Property Owner Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑ Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑ Engineer Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other* Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: SCANNED APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: ZMQC Contact: -Tq" es QrudDs Address: /yEL6 r,•-717Pr 14;ll S gogj City/State/Zip:/rl.'nnEfO-7ka AIAI SS -3°1S Phone: Cell: 6/Z SSS- 4f9c(S Fax: p Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Sod n C o r ey Contact: 30t� Go Address: _6q0°t plow 8P/1 Phone: 12 ZZ(' 89 23 City/State/Zip: 01zinhassen lk7xl Ss31% Cell: Email Signati Fax: Date: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable).1'. Name: ScxAre - Sn!ZyeSf T -, C Contact: gory S n Sfel ,*en Address: _ /sm SccA 8roAd K/o.y Phone:.(95Z� 976 -6000 City/State/Zip: Wq 2tD, itl S -53S3 Cell: �612) 802- 3Z 2 Z Email: o� Sagihre, Com Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: ❑ Property Owner Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑ Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑ Engineer Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: SCANNED /---------I--------\ I SURVEY LEGEND Let 3 o� IN I \ Lot 4 /� /� 1 . IN I j Imo_ _l I / .BLOCK 2 NN IN IN IN �\ \\ NN \ \ IN \\ \\ \ \ / li x. mx n^w�m rKi�e.onen�G�-ern mu....m...n..rr,rm'.. am M..n m I vy u.vq."nu mlm".am.n. mm.nm0.-0 N"rmm.mmnn.m p i,�m.R rni vrfmw. F_.mb.Ad tl n.e..l Nay n N unv Pa Nr. 9 ...wMn.lnn.nln+ibnn..l.l �uue'ru.. v. q..0 �a iwnw.0 nwe.arr.mp w+°x i'r vnepm. un vun 0-0 e.ub'e 'vlei�me FnlY 4N..K��.� u.....r. v rIN...o. aa.aN•rrq •..ara anrsw.:wa m"n=u14 amvla .e.a.ar�aw•aw•m'�w.�. n'..N.I"�in+n m'�em w�m.n n+,m M tlw:,ml a',i0w . mMNmm,n.mwxmq.en Mn .�M..n. �b�.ea.naufl.rtln...i�bnM��.ua �mm .1n.,.wWN s�.ve.dMKwu.tlulnwrn w.w m. e.nn..Y.l wM ra.v .�m.rvnv b�i.v.�s.". Kpvw.u.aml'� vv�w rt.viWw �wwt�r rv�da �VnaV.�u.I. m. ... erurnu.nn bm°^nluu. F bw I C SURVEY LEGEND o� m • - LLw� 4'r w SATHRE-BERGQUIST INC. "'""" Existing Conditions Survey Chentressen" " For .tl. srn®nErwnwo•emweEe�µ,� T ..�.�..I.. a mwa.n.+...>,I�aall.�� MINNESOTA 2061 West 65th Street , SURVEY LEGEND o� • - LLw� 4'r w SATHRE-BERGQUIST INC. "'""" Existing Conditions Survey Chentressen" " For .tl. srn®nErwnwo•emweEe�µ,� T ..�.�..I.. a mwa.n.+...>,I�aall.�� MINNESOTA 2061 West 65th Street i ..t / I .i .. .. .. .. Inl 'i 41.r .m.yfm �tlr4Ynr��a+�re+0.xJaM1 rnmwvxa...wury inmµ0.«rv�F.mu,tlA aravc+vert.um:.nn:xrnu.a...mn•n..e.aeri.+mxr<..u.p.a.rmw«ni«..wA..n Lrl � rvwF>me.�.�A.�r.x�ml umn n.n.«..aw..0«..u.m«e.M comm A..bn marwA _ I:LL: JLLJ4 �r rpn ____ ..M.n.W.....u.i..:u,n.im....�u.. eF..nn r.....w...u.e.nArer..".� _ ••�••••• N an.,... i....r.i.«arvwvr .a:m.....r.y.r'm..wr:r..:/ 4 4:.�M1.awer.a:r^•� qY w.Mrw•r rITV� r4_.IfA+T.RwM..nV...:.n..wtar. w. nm. A.AY Wu.gm.mirl. gruvn:.vn xsemmerm.MM� t�nunin nw.MTm.r0..nrvw.�..�me u�A'FrI.M�..Fp. r . n neau rvq it mie n. «:rvtMA tln....«, nennvu« reae �na+wu.«.n.M«e u. i. .. i. .m SURVEY LEGEND a Omven u �_mnu m rar iia° e��°w°.".ne�.:..'• m' ��wE �«e... ...a.w:. .rv,.,..rvA Aid A,, m. � 1.., ! •,': SATHRE-BERGGUIST, �, maa,T,.mm.,..,,z., s �+' INC. yr ..rr�vd,. oh.�r. Lot SVIlt Exhibit For 2067 West 65th Street ' - � Chanhassen MINNESOTA >..—.a..mxa.o,g.,. �• �, . euro GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN W est 65th Street ENE n.VMfi .P.w:m Nn. EN' MEP�'..MEy TM�MIE wAA M HE. 101P3 Insvjlx an ms9�x euw�PNEcdi - ncm 059 #i caulo. a 4 OF 7082,7 TF 083,0 1 100 BF 1051.8 fl.SCM,EWL BPM.EI TII CB] W 0871 INV 108]] a! � (1 � o I a TcTana - Arv.los8n - r0�.. o �x i 1pieslm cd+ -,IN , rc-w;4i �I 0 Pvca12 ; µ..' RM ,BLOCK 2 ENMTNC THE NTAAZ MEaNPMINMINAOE IRAN r1100 ANYANDALLMaINGUMIEEVINUDEEVLT NIAONNL LMAigN RA, MIEx6,NOYRAIlTft CCM NENCNNO Na)AH E/LREeaNGOHTE HOPLLU Nx TL:`«ATE.ND11181 NE.NrANa,.IExM.,.EM LEA, AUCOACOHSAUC MATCE TM i MEN aiATEONE TNN C,M. dA6d SYMBOLLEGEND ENE n.VMfi .P.w:m Nn. EN' MEP�'..MEy TM�MIE wAA M HE. U.AN. Ems.. W. DNAN Ii� ,W 0 M�..ME. "PRELIMINARY" HANDAINVINIANAR YMNEYi�xIIMAOI � °°"M".,°..,"'.� ®MMM`a ••�••, ••,N•N=NANG,p GRADING B EROSION CONTROL PLAN wx SATHRE-BERGQUIST. INC. v i M.wNEwwr...rc.,A w.+l wemm CANHASEN, 2081 WEST 68TH STREET IN 1—H— NNNNANNANNN ENE n.VMfi .P.w:m Nn. EN' MEP�'..MEy wAA M HE. U.AN. Ems.. W. DNAN Ii� "PRELIMINARY" °°"M".,°..,"'.� ®MMM`a ••�••, ••,N•N=NANG,p GRADING B EROSION CONTROL PLAN . ? SATHRE-BERGQUIST. INC. i M.wNEwwr...rc.,A w.+l wemm CANHASEN, 2081 WEST 68TH STREET �/��/ y, t MINNESOTA MINNESOTA Y g DAMES BRUDOS UTILITY PLAN i FarXvpF« •: • ..T... FW MEENMMNMMPILOSIN)E NMV ONLY. TI iOReMtlIRTERFEFWL) LCCRTtlMMMYMV LLUO:M u+Vf4fB6ME XCNO KOIIF. Xl RRXEE9 i0YfVLLYRE9TAICKLE ��OW �MRS MUST CON IOE RMV MOLAL YIM/A!e I.RNNOp/fCixBF.LLVXEiO IARCmaLV IRRi! Rx0 MEIFAVE MYMO NL E®1N0 l lEm 9x. ®VN O FMER STATE t )NM CRKE Itlll MOaIL nmuMcan♦amv�rstivmmuuw¢crmnnceomL N 1 9R.1xa i f INV-tose.e ,� 6° ✓�E '�ixneary -------- f SNV1If wv lou;.a Eatl.T.mc� P ��OSS I Ir I( IN`L1LB) I� y t 1056EIyYP,V Palccl iG 1 +we # n.mn # i .s �7,", GF 1062.7 a GRND V R 0m.4 XX TF 1063.6 --- 1 r BF 10615 p 9awatOMOMwdNtMff y' (t,WCUMA )C1 I06)) NW 1 ' PiiY�D,S,��UCC&5N. ao �JJ' PIS ti TC. 1080.0 �)ISQ 3o%•+)QRO IHJ i FarXvpF« •: • ..T... FW MEENMMNMMPILOSIN)E NMV ONLY. TI iOReMtlIRTERFEFWL) LCCRTtlMMMYMV LLUO:M u+Vf4fB6ME XCNO KOIIF. Xl RRXEE9 i0YfVLLYRE9TAICKLE ��OW �MRS MUST CON IOE RMV MOLAL YIM/A!e I.RNNOp/fCixBF.LLVXEiO IARCmaLV IRRi! Rx0 MEIFAVE MYMO NL E®1N0 l lEm 9x. ®VN O FMER STATE t )NM CRKE Itlll MOaIL nmuMcan♦amv�rstivmmuuw¢crmnnceomL N 1 9R.1xa i f SATHRE-BERGQUIST INC. CHANHASSEI MINNESOTA ) ^OrnM rnnn CNMN.Mnx.M Ox.Y-.lole4 bMM. nen Aumn Ykmf♦ . Fm. w Ax, RI6. lu leq pr. 10 M <x.Yani .MWrxMx I)pn, Fmy. Po'.IM'. Rf Hv/t'm.M "PRELIMINARY" UTILITY PLAN 2051 WEST 65TH STREET 2 JAMESBRUDOS 2 MIT MSYMBOLGEND 9awatOMOMwdNtMff tloMKn.exwa wecxErllvmw.TlKe u ) ^OrnM rnnn CNMN.Mnx.M Ox.Y-.lole4 bMM. nen Aumn Ykmf♦ . Fm. w Ax, RI6. lu leq pr. 10 M <x.Yani .MWrxMx I)pn, Fmy. Po'.IM'. Rf Hv/t'm.M "PRELIMINARY" UTILITY PLAN 2051 WEST 65TH STREET 2 JAMESBRUDOS 2 0 • 4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on November 13, 2014, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Postponement of Public Hearing for 2061 West 65th Street Metes & Bounds Subdivision — Planning Case 2014-30 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Karin J. _: Jdt, Depul(*klerk Subscribed and my rn to before me this 13Nay of —12014. Notary P lic Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen City Council Meeting When is the17700 onday, November 24, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. public Rescheduled from October 27, 2014) hearing: ity Hall Council Chambers Market Boulevard Request for a Metes and Bounds Subdivision of a Proposal: 0.69 -acre parcel into two (2) lots on property zoned Proposal: Single Family Residential (RSF) Planning Case No. 2014-30 Applicant: John & Kimberly Core Address/ 2061 West 65th Street Location of A location map is on the reverse side of this Proposal: notice. This public hearing gives the neighborhood an opportunity to comment on the proposal. During the meeting, the Mayor will lead the public hearing What through the following steps: happens 1. Staff will summarize the request. at the 1. Staff will summarize the request. meeting: 2• The applicant may comment on the request. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Council discusses the request. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-30. If you wish to Questions talk to someone about this project, please contact Questions Sharmeen AI-Jaff by email at & saliaff(dilci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952- Comments: 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will Notice of this public hearing has been published in the provide copies to the City Council. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on November 13, 2014. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen City Council Meeting When is the Monday, November 24, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. public (Rescheduled from October 27, 2014) hearing: City Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Boulevard Request for a Metes and Bounds Subdivision of a 0.69 -acre parcel into two (2) lots on property zoned Proposal: Single Family Residential (RSF) Planning Case No. 2014-30 Applicant: John & Kimberly Core Address/ 2061 West 65th Street Location of A location map is on the reverse side of this Proposal: notice. This public hearing gives the neighborhood an opportunity to comment on the proposal. During the meeting, the Mayor will lead the public hearing What through the following steps: happens at the 1. Staff will summarize the request. meeting: 2. The applicant may comment on the request. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Council discusses the request. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-30. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Questions Sharmeen AI-Jaff by email at & saliaff(cDci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952- Comments: 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the City Council. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on November 13, 2014. BERNARD C JR & SANDRA BENZ BRUCE A & JEAN A MATTSON CAROL ASLESEN CHILD 2061 65TH ST W 2020 CRESTVIEW DR 6482 MURRAY HILL RD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9006 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8007 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8994 CASEY C MCDANIEL CHARLES R & BEVERLY J JACKSON CHRISTOPHER M JERDEE 2020 65TH ST W 2110 CRESTVIEW DR 2081 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9005 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8009 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9006 CRAIG R & CATHERINE JOHNSON CYNTHIA A BODIN DANA F NICHOLSON 2071 MELODY HILL RD 2061 MELODY HILL RD 6500 GALPIN BLVD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8888 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8888 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9013 DORIS L NIKOLAI TRUST DOUGLAS E & MARY K JOHNSON GARY A NYBERG PO BOX 1461 REV 6410 GALPIN BLVD SHERWOOD, OR 97140-1461 6474 MURRAY HILL RD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8018 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8994 JOHN J & JUNE A HAMSHER JOHN J & LYNNETTE J DELUCA JOHN THOMAS FAVORITE II 2081 MELODY HILL 6484 MURRAY HILL RD 2080 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8888 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8994 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9005 KATHERINE MARIE ANTOINETTE MICHAEL J STACHOWSKI NANCY H LIBERG REV TRUST FOR 2050 CRESTVIEW DR 3543 LILAC LN EXCELSIOR, LSIOR,MURRAHILL 31 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8007 MINNETONKA, MN 55345-1024 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8994 PAUL S TUNGSETH PEGGY LOU TRAGER RICHARD & BARBARA D ATHERTON 2051 CRESTVIEW DR 2080 CRESTVIEW DR 2082 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8008 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8007 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9005 ROBERT M & LINDA M PETERSON STEVEN S & LORI A ABBLETT TIMOTHY P & HEIDI S LARKIN 2040 65TH ST W 2081 CRESTVIEW DR 2150 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9005 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8008 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8009 WILLIAM C & JUDITH J ASHENBACH 2041 65TH ST W EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9006 I HAKANSON !NDERSON ASSOCIATES, Inca P.O. Box 665 222 Monroe Street Mr. Bernard Benz 311 3rd Street Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Re: Benz Percolation Dear Bernie: professional engineers and surveyors Anoka, Minnesota 55303 612/427.5860 September /_01- 3 206,1 2, 1980 g1r. At your request percolation testing was performed at your lot located at part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 3 Township 116 North Range 23 West in Carver County, Minnesota. Standard methods of percolation testing were employed. Elevations are relative to an assumed elevation of 100.0' based at the top of the hydrant at the northeast property corner (see enclosed sketch). This report includes: 1. 4oil boring logs 2. Percolation test results 3. Testhole location sketch and system configuration diagram 4. Septic system design specifications 5. Discussion and recommendations. The soil boring logs show sandy loam to sandy clay loam surface materials overlie heavier and firmer clay loam materials at depth. Significant soil mottling begins at about 1.5 feet depth at both boreholes. Soil mottles (spots of contrasting color) are accepted indicators of periodic saturation in soils. Soil gleying begins at about 4.0 feet depth at both boreholes. Gleying (dull gray soil color) forms in soils which are saturated and in a chemically reduced condition for long periods of time. Because the Chanhassen sewage ordinance requires three (3.0) feet elevation difference between the bottom of standard sewage absorption trenches and the water table or soil mottling, the site is unsuited for installa- tion of a conventional trench type septic system. An alternative means of sewage disposal, such as the mound (also known as the berm) system, is recommended. The percolation test results (below) show that measured percolation rates are faster than the 120 minute per inch minimum rate for mound systems. Soil texture at Hole Elevation Depth(inches) bottom of hole Percolation rate (min/in) #1 98.1 24 Silty clay loam 3.0 RVkr�r-) lit 97.9 28 Sandy loam to sandy 2.1 clay loam OCT 1 4 1981 CITY 0r= CHANHASSEI civil municipal planning soils land surveying 0 a Mr. Bernard Benz - 2 - September 2, 1980 Measured percolation rates are somewhat rapid for the soil material in which the percolation tests were run. The design of the mound is based on a per- colation rate of 30-60 minutes per inch which is a typical rate for permeable clay loam soils, k The minimum rockbed area for the mound is based on estimated sewage flow from a three bedroom house, 450 gallons per day, and the design infiltration rate of the medium sand fill material, 1.2 gallons per square foot per day. 450 gallon/day - 1.2 gallon/ft2/day - 375 ft2 4 Two rock beds, each 10 feet wide by 20 feet long, provide the needed area. The required basal area of the mound is based on the design infiltration rate for a soil with a percolation rate of 30 to 60 minutes per inch, or 0.74 gallons per square foot per day. 450 gallon/day i 0.74 gallon/ft2/day = 608 ft2 With 3 to 1 sideslopes and 1.5 feet of medium sand fill beneath the rock beds, the basal area of the mound is 1,845 square feet; so sufficient infiltration area is provided by the design. The pressure distribution system consists of Schedule 40 PVC pipe. The supply pipe is 2';inch inside diameter pipe. The supply pipe should slope back towards the pumping chamber so that it drains after the mound is -dosed. The laterals are 1.5 inch inside diameter pipe. The laterals should have 1/4 inch diameter holes drilled at a spacing of 3.0 feet. The laterals should be connected to the manifold so the holes point downwards into the rock. The distal ends of the laterals should be capped. Also, the last hole in each lateral should be drilled horizontally in the end cap near the crown of the pipe to facilitate air venting. A submersible effluent pump capable of delivering at least 34 gallons per minute at a total dynamic head of at least 13.7 feet should be selected. Headlosses are calculated as follow: 1. Elevation headloss of 7.5 feet between top of mound (elevation 100.5) and pump discharge (approximate elevation 93.0) 2. Friction headloss of 1.2 feet in 50 feet of supply pipe (2.4 feet loss per 100 feet of 2 inch I.D. plastic pipe) and 3. Five (5.0) feet to account for losses in distribution network. If elevations or distances are changed, headloss should be recalculated. The sole purpose of soils data contained herein is evaltationof soil suitability for on-site absorption of septic tank effluent at the test site. Although soil Mr. Bernard Benz - 3 - September 2, 1980 texture and horizonation and ground water elevation data may be helpful for the setting of basement elevations at this site, we cannot warrant any such interpretations or the use of this data for other purposes. i If you have any questions regarding information contained in this report, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, 1 HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 11 C� Gary J.� thbun, Soil Scientist GJR/jkw Enclosures File: 740.01 LOGS OF'SOIL BORINGS PROJECT: Benz Percolation FILE N0, 740.01 BORING PIETHOD: Borehole 111 - 3" Hollow tube 0-4'DATE: 8/28/80 4" Flight auger 4-6.5' Borehole #2 - 4" Flight auger 0-7.5' Borehole #1 "'Borehole #2 DEPTH 0.0 _ (feet) Black sandy clay loam Grayish brown sandy loam to sandy clay loam with many Gray silty clay loam with many yellowish brown mottles Gray clay loam with many red and yellowish brown mottles, moist Grayish brown sandy clay loam to clay loam with many red and yellowish brown mottles, many bluish gray gleyed areas END OF BORING RPVATTnNi - 9R.D 1.: 1.F 3.= 4.2 6.5 GROUND WATER AT 93.6' ON 8/28/80 MICANSOid ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC, DEPTH 0.0 (feet) i Dark brown sandy clay loam 4 Light grayish brown sandy loam to sandy clay loam with few brownish yellow mottles Grayish brown sandy clay loam with many yellowish brown mottles Grayish brown sandy clay with many red and yellowish brown mottles, soft and moist Grayish brown clay loam with many red and yellowish brown mottles, many bluish gray gleyed areas, firm Bluish gray sandy clay with many red mottles, firm END OF BORING 1.0- 1.7 3.0 4.0 5.5 6.5 i� T FI FVATTOIJ — 97.9 GROUND WATER AT 93.2 ON 8/28/80. BY: u i CONSULTING SOANGINEERS 612/546-6938 ��`• SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING INC. 7415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE II I MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 Job No. S-81139 June 29, 1981 Mr. Bernard Benz 311 - 3rd Street Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 re: Soil Investigation Single Family Dwelling Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition 2601 West 65th Street Chanhassen, Minnesota We were retained by Mr. Dwight Cravens, acting in behalf of Mr. Bernard Benz, to conduct a soils investigation for this project. The purposes of our work were to determine the general soil and ground water conditions within the proposed building area, and to prepare a report of our findings, including comments on recommended foundation types, footing design and installation procedures, etc. PROCEDURE A total of two (2) soil test holes were drilled at locations designated by Mr. Cravens in the field. The field work was performed on June 22, 1981 using a truck -mounted CME -55 drill unit, SOIL AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING. FIELD LOADING TESTS, ROAD SUBGRADE INVESTIGATIONS, EARTHWORK CONTROL & PAVEMENT DESIGN. MATERIALS TESTING. OBSERVATION AND CONSULTATIONS M The test holes were advanced with 34"i.d, x 7"o.d. continuous flight, hollow stem augers which act as a temporary casing to prevent collapse of the sides of the holes. Standard penetration tests were performed in advance of the auger tip at 2 to 5 foot intervals of depth, in accordance with procedures designated in A.S.T.M. D-1586. Periodic observations for group water levels in the boreholes were made while drilling and afte completion. All soil samples obtained were brought to our laborator for examination and classification. They will be retained for a period of at least 90 days from date of issue of this report, after which they will be discarded unless we are otherwise notified. Drawing No. 1 is a site plan showing the soil test hole locations in relation to the outline of the proposed house. Detailed soil descriptions along with a plot of the standard penetration test blows per foot are given on the Borehole Log sheet, Drawing No. 2. Following the regular written soil descriptions are capital letters in parentheses, which represen the appropriate group symbols of the Unified Soil Clossificatio System. A chart explaining this system is appended. All elevations in this report are to geodetic datum, and were obtained using the bench mark noted on the site plan. SITE AND GEOLOGY The property under present study is located on the upper portion of a large hill south of Lake �Ainnetonko. Natural inorganic soil at the site consists mainly of clayey glacial t�4.' SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING INC. MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. z x" 3 related to the Des Hoines ice lobe of the Wisconsin glaciation. During post -glacial times, a surface layer of topsoil has formed. According to information published by, the State of Minnesota Geological Survey, the uppermost bedrock stratum under this site is believed to be dolomitic limestone of the Prairie du Chien formation. There is an area of dumped fill just south of Borehole SOIL CONDITIONS Only two basic soil types were encountered in our inve tigation. These are: topsoil; and Des Moines clayey glacial till. Topsoil A surface layer of topsoil,ranging in thickness from 1.5' to 2', occurs at our test hole locations. The topsoil consists of block organic silty and sandy clay. It is in a soft condition, with standard penetration test values of 2 an 4 blows per foot. It is overlain by a thin layer of brown silty cloy fill at Borehole 2. The topsoil is unsuitable for foundation or floor slab support, or as o subgrade below a pavement. Water Modified Clayey Glacial Till The topsoil is underlain by a major stratum of clayey glacial till. The uppermost 3 to 6 feet of the soil stratum has been modified by alluvial action, and consists of a mixture of grey and brown silty clay, clayey silt and clayey sand with random lenses of sand. SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING INC. n x MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 4 The upper mixed glacial till has a soft to stiff consistency, with standard penetration test values ranging from 2 to 8 blows per foot. This soil layer has low load bearing capacity and moderate compressibility. Des Moines Clayey Glacial Till Commencing at a depth of 4.6' to 8' below present ground surface, and extending beyond the terminal depths of our borings, is a dark grey sandy clay with traces of gravel, and random thin lenses of fine sand. Standard penetration test resistances within the dark grey clay vary from 5 to 13 blows per foot, representative of a stiff to tough consistency. This soil has moderate load-bearing capacity and low compressibility, and is a good foundation subsoil. GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Free ground water was observed in both boreholes, at a depth of 13' below present ground surface shortly after compl n drilling. The water then slowly rose to a dept of 2.6' below pr sent ground surface, corresponding to There are a number of lakes in the vicinity of the site. Lake Minnetonka and Golpin Lake to the north have average water elevations of 930' and 942' respectively. Lake Minnewashto to the west has an average water elevation of 944 Christmas Lake to the northeast has on average water elevatio of 932', and Lake Lucy to the southeast has an average water elevation of 956'.. ;y.',....h SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING INC. r x MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 5 A smaller lake known as Harrison Lake, to the south, has an average water elevation of less than 1000'. An analysis of this information indicated that the observed water levels in the soil borings represents perched ground water conditions, wherein the water is retarded from. further downward percolation by relatively impervious clay soils below. Thus, even though some seepage could potentially occur in excavations extending deeper than 3 feet, the volume of such seepage water would be small, and could be handled by conventional pumping. DEVELOPMENT PLANS It is proposed to build a single family dwelling along with an attached garage at this lot. The proposed house is a 4 -level, split-level home. The major portion of the house is a slab -on -grade structure with only a relatively shallow sub - grade crawl space level below the family room. The buildin will have masonry foundation walls to outside grade level, wi wood frame construction above. Structural loads on the foot- ings of such a building are relatively light. Lowest design floor level is approximately at existing ground level. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The stiff to tough clayey glacial till soils underlyi this site are competent foundation subsoils for the proposed residential structure. maipliffif, SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING INC. MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. G All obviously organic topsoil and any overlying existing fill should be stripped and removed from the buildi and pavement areas. In addition, it is recommended that the upper soft clay zone should be subcut in the proposed buildin area, and should be replaced with approved compacted sand fil Removal of topsoil and subcut of soft clay soils to a depth of 3' below grade at our test hole locations is recommended. Fill necessary to reach design grades should be on approved inorganic sand soil, free of any foreign material or debris. It should be spread in 6 to 8 -inch maximum loose lifts and should be compacted to achieve at least 93% Moximum Modified Proctor Dry Density, A.S.T.M..D-1557 in general fill areas and 95% Modified Proctor Dry Density in the uppermost 2i feet below pavement areas. It appears that it would be necessary to place the lowest design floor level approximately 14 feet above present ground surface at our test hole locations, in order to provid a minimum 4' separation between the floor slab and ground water levels observed in our borings as required by F.H.A. The building may then be supported upon conventional, relatively shallow apread footing foundation based on approv compacted sand fill. A net allowable soil bearing pressure of 1500 pounds per square foot may be used for the footing design. SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING INC. x Yx MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 7 All perimeter footings in heated portions of the build ing areas must be a minimum of 3' feet below outside finished grade for frost protection purposes. Perimeter footings in unheated portions such as the outside garage walls should be at least 4 feet below outside grade. Continuous strip foot- ings under bearing walls should be at least 18 inches wide for practical reasons. It is also recommended that a perimet tile drain system should be installed around the footings to provide drainage from the sand fill. A conventional flexible pavement design, consisting of a 5" compacted granular base course overlain by a 2" hot bituminous wearing surface, may be used above the sand fill surface in the driveway area. GENERAL The soil conditions have been established at our test hole locations only. There are likely to be variations in conditions between and around the borings, and interpolation or extrapolation of the results is not warranted. During construction, all excavations, earthwork, fill placement and compaction should be monitored and tested by a qualified soil engineer. We would be pleased to provide the necessary field engineering observation and testing services. SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING INC. n .x MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. E The recommendations contained in this report are intended solely for a project of the type described herein. I the event that any changes in the nature, design or location of the building are planned, the recommendations and concl"usiJ- contained in this report shall not ,be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and the recommendations and conclusid, of this report are modified or verified in writing. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. Bernard Benz and Mr. Dwight Cravens for specific applicatk to a Single Family Dwelling at 2601 West 65th Street, Chanhas+ Minnesota in accordance with generally accepted soil and foun+ tion engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING INC. Patricia. J.' Bach Geologicol" ''Engineer 4dervyn 4indess Registered Professional Engineer PJB:MM/pg Distribution: 4 cc Mr. Bernard Benz 1 cc File SUBTERRANEAN* ENGINEERING INC. :yx MINNEAPOLIS, MINN, EDGE OF ROAD (NOT BOUNDARY) X /NES ADDITION OCK 2 T 3 ,QNz EL. 1075.6' TEST HOLE *1 Ah EL. 1075.6' PROPOSED 8020/NG NOTES: BENCH MARK- SPIKE IN POWER POLE , S.E. CORNER OF GALPIA BLVD. d LAKE LUCY RD. ELEV. 1043.00' GEODETIC DATUM • TEST HOLE NO- I p LOCATION F HOLE ADVANCED 4Y I 9T 100.1 T HN p S —DATE H LOGGED GY iLEV. ^NO. SLOWS PER 30 40 DESCRIPTION y Pale grey to grey brown, silty -lay andcla a silt rote gravel an – .e (CL�ML). Saturated. Slightly plastic. Soft to stiff. Dark grey fine sandy cloy, tracera ave) lenses fine sand between ®' 6' 11' depths. (CL). Slightly plastic. Tough to'Stiff. NO. GLOWS PER .FOOT TEST HV&c –•— c p LOCATION PHOEE ADVANCED ;GY �� 11VA1 T DATE H TOGGED BY I PER FOOT 'PESCRVTION I LEV NO. SLOWS .. n 10 HOLE TERMINATED, No Refusal. . ate: Water levelat 9.5' depth File drilling Dred at 17.5'. " epth upon completion. Hole - over] at 17.5.' depth and water .evel at' 16.5' depth after :3s'ino deptbm1$ hourster latera Vel at Water Level at 2.6' depth 1 day later-. clay. (CL). grer _-- and fine clayey_sand, Dark grey, firer sand cla'I trace rg evel� random lenses fine slued• (CL) . Slightly plastic) Tough to Stiff. I �i��eKMu�K! HOLE TER j jME�tNN�e wm�NN�Nmasce oliiiie�rwnm�iouiu N��N��\�Yl■Y�NpE ' U61=011 Mason IM _ ..�lSMEN "IYNIR - unmu� moa gin: . ense iHs�i ��ssfNm1111111 C�NdnNGNNE fITF h _MinDii h ` d Benz !OR Ili c 811 t9 OUR JOB INDEX ® ORVNIC MOISTI ®.CONTE CLAY ORGANIC ® B SILT STAN D PENEI PEAT JEST SAND '- t NO E `�� 1I''• f m GRAVEL rT.r FENS ® 11101 ROM TEST __X_ WATER LPEL = rPLASTIC. lEM1Y - I*LIQUID LIMIJi — SYMBOLS C – COHESION, L0. /' 1 _ INTERNAL FRICTION, S – SATURATION, "_. WET DENSITY, LS. Ce UNCONFINED COMI STRENGTH W – NATURAL M01STU T _ UNDISTURBED SAM' SV R ENGIN EE RI in.MINNEAPO SI sept GONSULT�.� d.ew.p P.B. ch.SIc- (^ GENERAL NOTES DESCRIPTIVE TERMINOLOGY DENSITY CONSISTENCY APPROX UNCONFINED TERM N VALUE TERM N VALUE COMPRESSION STRENGTH Very Loose 0-4 Soft 0-4 0 — 1200 psf Loose 5-10 Stiff 5-8 1200 — 2000 psf Medium Dense I1-30 Tough 9-15 2000 — 4000 Fist Dense 31-50 Very Tough 16.30 4000 — 8000 psf Very Dense Over 50 Hard Over 30 Over — 8000 psf RELATIVE PROPORTIONS MATERIA{ CLASSIFICATION TERM RANGE TERM SIZE Trace 0 — SO/0 Boulder Over 8 inches A little 6 - 15 0/o Cobble 8 — 4 inches Some 16 - 300/o Med Course Gravel 4-3/8 inches With 31 - 500/o Fine Gravel 3/8 in - NO 10 sieve Sand N010 sieve -N0 200 sieve Silt and Clay Finer than 200 sieve MOISTURE DESCRIPTION DEGREE .OF SATURATION % Dry 0 Humid 1-Z5 Domp 25-50 Moist 50-75 Wet 75-99 Soturoted 100 WATER LEVEL SYMBOL -'WF Water levels shown on the boring loge are the levels measured in the borings at the time and under the conditions indicated. In Sand, the indicated levels can be considered reliable ground water levels. In Clay soil, it is not possible to determine the ground water level within the normal scope of a test boring investigation, except where lenses a layers of more pervious waterbearing soil are present and then a long period of time may be necessary to reach equilibrium. Therefore, the position of the water level symbol for cohesive or mixed texture Boils may not indicate the true level of the ground water table. The available water level information is given at the bottom of the log sheet. SUBTERRANEAN ENGINEERING INC. CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES ASTM Designation: D 2467 - 66 T AND D 2488 - 66 T Unified Soil Classification System Major divisions GroupTypical symbols+ names Laboratory classification criteria Dao fDso12 GW Well -graded gravels, gravelsand c � C.—greater than 4; Cc. between 1 and 3 DtoXD60 ff mi ztures, little or no fins D10 rao_ 116 °c C.° $A M Y i 2.2 U Gp Poorly Faded Bevels, gravel• C $ . ` Not meeting all gradation requirements for GIN w s J send mixtures, little or no firm u N — e GM d Silty gravels, gnvelsendsilt mixtures y y 4 ` Atterberg limits below "A" line or P.I. less than 4 "A" r 2G esti - Above line with F u " `o between 4 and 7 an d "A" 1C d Y_ z 3 i E N t ggact derGne cases requiring t .a z pp�-'� Y u GC Clayey Brawls, gravelsend-claY Atterberg limits above of dual symbols f c £ -= line with P.I. greater than 7 rmixtures E g - , , S g SW Well -graded sands, gravelly c "- D60 fDaols C greater than 6; C . between 1 and 3 a c t= sands, little or no filres A u Dlp c D10XD6o _ Y 8 O Q g ,a Wit. c C `° c + 6 Ee 9 c `o 6 a O - SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly c f Not meeting all gradation requirements for SW } sands, little or no fines 0 0 x , + S O _ a�g8 x S ' Atterberg limits below "A" e c c SM Silty sank, Sandsilt mixtures Y $ $ d a u line or P.I. less than 4 Limits plotting in hatch P.I.P.I, beiwn tombetween c u Y£ H and 7 are luo = + - g Y Y "A" of requiring use r of dust N ay Clayey Sands, sand -clay mix- a, + N Atterberg limits above bots. SC tum F Y = line with P.I. grater than 7 Inorganic silk and very fine ands, rock flour, silty or clay - ML ey fine Sands or clayey silts 60 c with slight plasticity fine-grained For classification fr yy Inorganic clays of low to me- dium days, ti costed veils and fine fraction of coara- o CL plasticity, grmlly 50 grained soils. .M j € Andy clays, silty Clays, lean Atterberg Limits plotting in 8 clays hatched era an borderline closest - CH �Jj a ficati°ns requiring use of dual d 5 symbols. CM ) OL Organic silo and organic silty x Equation of Mine: £ Nays of low plasticity Y PI -0.73 ILL • 201 _ 30 YR Inorganic silts, micKe" or MH diatomaceous fine Sandy or •� OH a MH i silty soils, ela tic sins s P 20 LL u Inorganic days of high plat- CL ° « CH ticity. fat clays 10 t C a 7 L -M ML* dOL a4 Organic clays of medium to , e J OH high Dlesticiry, organic silts 0 10 20, 30 40 60 60 70 90 90 1 Liquid Limit •Y _. Pat and other highly organic wilt Plasticity chaR 0 • U.S. Uar.artment of Housing and Urban Development Certification By REGISTERED ARCIIITECT(S)/ENGINEERS(S) OR OTHER PROFESSIONALS) S/0 Numbeh ' 27 —22D 75 S/D Name L E Tract or Unit Number o Number of lots City b State Developer Nz I Mp� ERUY�d III�NDESS Registered #:cW#ect/Engineer, or (designation), to the best of my personal knowledge, belief and professional judgment, do hereby state that: (1) The attached Working Drawings and Specifications suh,l`vi%on identified above, meet HUD s on procedures and a Lives described in ooks 4900.1. Chapters 3 dud h, 4140.1and HG. J The drawings and specifica- tions M n approved by locai authorities and are in ,ante with applicable local standards; (2) The WortAng Drawings and Specificatio as J includ rovai signature and seal as — n Frchii eer or responsible �rt!e.r preparation; (3) The proposed development in accordance with these Wo Iir wirgs and Specifications (a) is permisst er the appi;ceble zoning, building, housi other codes, ordinances or regulation o ified by any waivers oi.talned from a ate officials, and (b) complies with Minim! rty Standards and other applicable standards elines and criteria. _ PVEG sou _ (LBvakT .'5-81139 Feld 7ff6 PRnAV T IN JVN� , IgXI,_ `Al Waivers of codes, etc., were obtained as listed in attachment: ... ---- J I am aware of applicable sanctions provided in Title 18 U.S.C. 1010 and hereby declare that the foregoing statements are not false, fictitious, or fraudulent. I ar also aware that HUD will not accept future statements from me if any of the foregoing statements are false or incomplete. REGISTERED GI ER(S)A..... Tc Signed Signed Professional's Name fM INxis Title Business ddress c, Name o ompany L�L�AAS S S Business Address Telephone _ License Number s' I— Mi� a ep one -z zo Date A716 19 Date J If a reference is not applicable to your certification, strike it out and initial. J Identify Drawings and Specifications including information normally found in the Title Block of drawings. J Identify attachment. HUD Form 92255-A April, 1980 Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc Patrick J Hines, PE 8167100" St S Cottage Grove MN 55016 (612)414-5770 25 October 2014 CITY OFCHANHASSEf f RECEIVED NOV 0 4 7014 Mr James Rudos 14846 Timber Hill Road CHANHA88ENPLANNINGDEPT Minnetonka MN 55345 Re: Subsurface Soil Investigation Proposed Single Family Residence W of 2061 W 65' St, Chanhassen, Minn In accordance with your authorization, I have completed the above referenced investigation to determine site suitability for the proposed construction. A summary of my findings together with boring logs and my conclusions and recommendations are presented in the enclosed report. I found, as you already have been briefed, more than usual problems with the site. There is a total of 53/4'& 0/4 at the locations of Boring 1 & Probe 1 A, respectively, of unsuitable soil in the form of topsoil fill, general and varying fill, and buried original humus. Below at first is a low sand content lean clay, generally dark in color, saturated, very soft to soft (w/ depth). It is "normally consolidated" (consolidated enough to only support its own weight, not additional weight of fill soils or structures above). The overburdening fill has not been inplace long enough to force further consolidation. The moisture content test in this material indicated nearly 42%, high for a lean clay. This material extends only from 5'/4 to Tin Boring 1, but from 04 to 8'/2'in Probe IA. The first 9" of this material in Probe lA is very soft and is a borderline marl material. All of the aforementioned materials are unsuitable for structure support should be removed. I do acknowledge that excavators are often reluctant to excavate further once the buried organic soil is cleared, so understandings should be inplace at the time of gathering bids. Base soil below at first is a lean clay, a little sandy, dark gray, saturated, rather soft to medium. It has inclusions of a poorly graded (biased finer grained) sand with a few fines, also dark gray, saturated, loose to firm. Deepest soil, commencing at 1 Fin Boring 1, is a lean clay, rather sandy, dark gray, low gravel content, medium. Theses materials are glacial rill. The sand inclusions in the upper portion are glacial outwash. All of these base mineral soils are suitable for residential construction, with conditions. Refusal to auger advancement was not encountered by boring termination depth of 23', indicating lack of bedrock to this level. Very importantly, groundwater was found in the main Boring at 1.8' (elev 96'/4±). It is aquifer groundwater, but marginally so. It appears to be contained primarily in the sand inclusions at 7'+. But it also is coming from the upper soft and very soft clay, possibly from SCANNED Mr James Rudos 25 October 2014 Page 2 the lower organic soil. Proper construction on the site (removing the softer lean clay, promoting good site drainage) will mitigate some of this. Thus, water found presently can be regarded as a maximum level. Slab grade of the proposed residence should be set in accordance with City requirements utilizing this level. I recommend complete removal of all unsuitable soil which is likely to be the fill and buried organic soil as encountered plus the overly soft clay found in both the boring and probe. While this amounts only to another V/4 in the vicinity of Boring 1, it is another 2'+ in the vicinity of Probe IA. As indicated, excavators may be reluctant to excavate below organic soil level, but it is necessary (see longer discussion in the report). It is so important that full time inspection of the excavation by a soils engineer may be necessary. Of course, other zones of unsuitable soil not represented by the boring and probe could still be encountered due to the nature of small volume random sampling. Any other depths or zones of unsuitable soil should be removed as well. You could lower footings somewhat so that you have to provide less oversizing and not stray onto the neighbor's property. But footings here should not be lowered so much as to rest directly upon the suitable base soil as it is only marginally suitable. You need a little fill (2' is recommended) to spread footing loads out with depth. Footings maybe generally designed allowing the usual 2000 psf foundation bearing capacity, which will likely result in normal strip or pad footings. Special attention is again drawn to the advisory that excavations be examined by the Soils Engineer to verify soil boring results and to document adequacy of site preparation. Again this is very important as how much soft/very soft clay must be removed will require a high degree of field judgment. Fill, as used, should be tested for compaction adequacy. Soil correction should not be abated below slabs in any manner (ie, do not let the excavator try to "trench around" slab areas). Thank you for the opportunity to have been of service. If you have any questions on this, or if I can be of assistance in any additional capacity, do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, TATE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, Inc a 'ck J mes, PE President enclosures pH/SC Patrick J Hines, PE PROJECT: SOIL BORING LOG - 8167 100th St S Cottage Grove MN 55016 LOG OF BORING NO: 1 DEFT7H IN r SURFACE ELEVATION: 98.1 STS FEET GEOLOGY N DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION— CLAY, variably sandy, Organic (OL Topsoil ue(LEAN Black, w/ tr s mineral Soil, Fill TN1 ff i1 very moist, loose to firm T CLAY, smmhat sandy, Pred Dark Gray (CL) Fill RA 2 w/ a little Organic Soil, w/ tr gr (ele moist to very moist, loose to firm 3 LEAN CLAY, rather silty, Organic (OL) Buried 3 HA 0, , Black, w/ small roots, tr's undecom- Humus 4�posed vegetation, saturated, rather I 1I borderline Sapric Peat in soft I I I` 5 ppper portion s sl lighter, less organic, w/ depth 5.756 Lacustrine Y 4 HA 41.9 LEAN C Y, a tt a san y, ery ar to lDark Gray (CL), very soft to soft (w/ Deposit -- de th 71, poorly graIa pre zine gr, w med, tr cs), w/ a few fines, Dark Gray Glacial Y 5 HA 8%13 8 (SP), saturated, loose to firm Till, w/ utwesh I Y 6 FA 25.6 banded w/ LEAN CLAY, a little sandy, incOlusion 9- Dark Gray (CL), saturated, rather soft ! soft to medium @ 8}'+ 10 more bands of clay, less of sand, j depth I 11 I LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray Glacial N 7 FA j 12. (CL), w/ a little gravel Till 131 saturated, medium I 14 15� I I N 8 FA 16 I 17I- ! 18 J 19 i 20 I 21 I I 1 Ij SW 0� 5 mph± BreezA (rnntinued I ( 2 th l gstly Clear,l (23 on next sheet) athero• ) 700F±, WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS DRILLING DATA C�'calm DATE TIME SAMPLED UI SiMG CAVE-IN DRILLING WEER ! I DEPTH DE PTH DEFiM ;MUD LEVE LEVEL Cre.Chiet__ off 123 OctE16:29 7 ' None 3.8' Method. 3" Hand & 4" Power Flight* Augers *Mobile B-31 Drill I Rig on Dodge Power Wagon 24 Oct3:51 5, 1 8r ! 14:35 to 23' 6j' 3}' Cmmenced: 23 Octo er Soni QComolerod: 24 October 2014 j 15:20 5}' 2,1, SCANNED BOIL BORING LOG (continued) Parrl�k J Mu—% PR 816; 100th St S Cottsg= r,nvp MN 45016' Proposed Single Family Residence PROJECT: West of 2061 65th St. t Chanhassen Minn LOG OF BORING NO: i DEPTH SURFACE ELEVATION: 98.1 SAMPLE LAB 8 OTHER TESTS IN GEOLOGY N WB I L L FEET DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION /0 TYPE R W DE P.L. LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray (CL Glacial N 9 FA 22 w/ tr to a little gravel Till saturated, medium End of Boring - No Refusal Bore hole void backfilled w/ native cuttings mixed w/ Bentonite on 24 October 2014 PAI 27 Probe 1A - Elev = 97.8 2 0-6}' Topsoil Fill, Fill (S1 less 29 than Boring 1), Buried Humus 6}'-7' Lean Clay, possibly Marl, 30 Gray, saturated, very soft 7'-8}' Lean Clay, rather silty, Dark 31J Gray, saturated, very soft to soft 8}'-10}Lean Clay. w/ band inclusions, 32 Dark Gray, saturated, soft to medium 33 Probe put down by power flight auger method on 24 October 2014 6 ummeda- 34J ately backfilled w/ native cuttings j mixed w/ Bentonite 3511 36 371 4C 41 42' 43 44-1 45- i 46' I Probe 1, Elev = L 0 Boring No 1 Elev - 98.1 W 66th Street BENCH NARK Top nut fire hydrant on south side of street, approx on east line extended of 'parent" lot; Elev'-- 100.00 (arbitrary) LOCATIONS OF Patrick J Hines, PE SOIL BORINGS 8167 100th $t S Cottage Groves MN 55016 SCALE: III = 20' 1 1 .... cv nH DATE: 24 Oct 2014 Proposed Single Family Residence West of 2061 W 66th Street Chanhassen, Minnesota Client: James Rudos Minnetonka, Minn • s 0 • FROM : INTERSTATE CEOTECKNICAL ENG PHDNE ND. : 651 769 2467 Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc Patrick J Hines, PE 8167 100'^ St S Cottage Grove MN 55016 (612)414-5770 13 November 2014 Mr James Rudos 14846 Timberhill Road Minnetonka MIST 55345 Re: Subsurface Soil Investigation Proposed Single Family Residence W of 2061 W 65`s St, Chanhassen, Minn Nov. 13 2014 11:05AM P2 This is in response to your contact of recent regarding groundwater on this project. As you know, I investigated the lot last month and issued a report dated 25 October 2014. I found a total of 7 & 8`/= of unsuitable soil at the locations of Boring 1 & Probe IA, respectively, in the form of topsoil fill, general and varying fill, buried original humus and overly soft clay or marl. First suitable base soil is a loose to firm sand or a soft to medium lean clay. I recommended removing these materials and placing controlled fill, noting that you will have to seriously control groundwater in the process. Regarding groundwater, I found it very high on this site - at a stabilized level of 1.8'. As I understand it, The City of Chanhassen has asked if this water level will change as a result of site correction. I used as a stabilized water level the 1.8' found a day after the hand auger phase was completed. I had encountered water while drilling and did achieve the base granular soil that fust day. When I did the power auger phase, water was creeping up to nearly the same level a few hours later, so I felt that the 1.8' is valid. I believe that, when you correct this lot, controlling groundwater, and compacting fill, most likely granular, the groundwater will soon rebound to its original level - 1.8' as found in my boring. If you construct ordinary and good site drainage on your finished project, groundwater will not be affected by any artificial recharge the result of your activities. If you have any additional questions on this, or if I can be of assistance in any additional capacity, do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, INTERSTATE GEOTECHNJ�,3>nT VEERING, Inc ��ex a hqt 1 F ESE3Y C' :f IF! TN;iT T ?iC pLn ! S7ECCIFCAFG11 OR +TC_-QPf/Y`GeNs� f.+.Uyv0! CT -. ,I . {c p. .:.?' 1:'.':J 1 1al I!1 i A v '_% LiI`. 3-0 PROrESSIDNAL Patrick 7 Hines, PB x tzsss v NEER Jr 11' "c LAWS OF TIE STATE OF WMESOTA President C bt 8TATE E oty� Or P r II/SC ��Fss N»• ° 60DATE: 13 /1�oy '(V MAiNESOTA REG. NO. i 2dff6 P G._ tONa4 _.tJ • AI-Jaff, Sharmeen 0 1 , ), 4z.. From: Chris Jerdee [cjerdee7@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 11:26 AM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Cc: Chris Jerdee Subject: proposed lot split and site development on W. 65th Street in Chanhassen Hello Sharmeen, My name is Chris Jerdee and I live at 2081 W. 65th Street in Chanhassen. I think I spoke to you a couple of weeks ago on the phone about the lot next to mine and a proposed splitting of the lot. The property was recently sold to gentlemen who is "flipping" the property and it's come to my understanding that he plans to split the lot into two parcels. The purpose of my letter is twofold. First, I want to inform you and/or whoever else might be working on this particular project that the lot in question has a pretty significant water problem. I'm surprised it was ever built on in the first place because the lot literally becomes a duck pond every spring when the snow melts and then again every time we get any significant rainfall. It will get standing water more than ankle deep on both the western edge of the lot bordering mine and also on the south side of the lot. As I understand it there are springs underneath the ground and the water table is very high. This is coupled with the fact that the street is higher than the lot so the water has nowhere to drain. I tried to remedy this on my property by having a landscaping contractor install drain file that ties into the catch basin in the culdesac. Unfortunately the lot in question next to me has an even larger drainage problem so it still impacts my property. Second, and more importantly, I want to be sure that if the lot is indeed approved to split and a new home is built that the proper steps are taken to ensure that any watershed does not impact my lot further. If any grading is done to build a new structure I want to be sure that it is not done in such a way that simply moves the water problem from that lot on to mine. Hopefully whoever buys the property does their due diligence and has a percolation test done because if not I think they might end up being surprised. Thanks in advance for your consideration regarding this matter. If you or anyone has any questions I can be reached at 612-385-1329. Chris Jerdee CITY OFCHMH RECEIVED EN SEF 2 R ?U 14 C4ANHASSENpLAN%ODEp, SCANNED T C C, r7 c /Y aU/�lG/L. /31-�s F a G T<% /� �L.s1 u1rrT 7' 34 <�n rwG s /'� 1�%� Irl LSA TN'Lr��,// a is D !.G N LrtL,rj S,�}.✓ny Tiftr�<YS%- L-�✓D 0 ,�' rhy3 L o T fi'+✓Jr w<T��UT f} !3 �Fs� �`Jt�?, /N S ✓nst++.CE w o vt� �✓07 CDY�n T,y�iR f�� a .tJ 14 FA i��Jr ��yl.� TgST D ^� T�}e u✓ ��T/D o,� r/& -s E /s E oN by 4 7- CA4 oppas�Tz- , %%7/r trt/L 7-&5T o•V 7';ZI A-ftT �7r✓pOrr*�/ �T /9907, ntle /Y"p�sr w ,r 06riT /waw 7V4f-At5✓L7-,s o.= PLf /�&/W-4 rArS T D .✓ TIME /p xcyZtV OB'►/" MAV -V' , A1P w cVir?', ,;:' tic_ OL)a .14 Ati7 I?AYA Ojy So Ape I Z 7 //m?tfa5 57-& Z`7- Iv q G lLgST lam/ El v CvZ AfA O Fmk i.'n A77C s yc,y u�J Tot r3LEO �t/'!t�4 ,Tfr- st+•�e sJ7vq;<0.V/ � o Cc. ,-I n_&-�a -rp�-jS L_A-&T J,).jAr. X7/,' /SPeo cu ar- qp T P�7-1774DA-d 7}744- C) 7, 7""b 43/1,VV4 5EwE/L /&-07c) O ✓ r2 S 7-eLA c7S , O ✓2 S.9D n C S/STt xi -F L4) &7L,t- uNvS�?-64 o,� Oor" Lve 164 A L -O k- 1-h G :,% <'1sj llyt r4y /h" a✓T 77Y -r- S�Onirw4T ae-s uL_% //u . S f o N G �/ G 1� ✓N� . THwtoc Ho 4/7, /rr i4T, /�19s7 6&n,p&-ms � STblM SeuJKY�- H/4in�TG'r✓A�G 10&x iO -c 44VI" 7-Ar5T-ify Ta 7-f*S. a 0 A/ )%; � d le,fiS /h/STJ9[Lt:-z9 r-2/q-r'r)0UL.//vLe", ,t UvG A- hwLAf- Foy �oST /7- F1"aro 4"tdJ W/irJ M f C.67J G '�ti/S fl /1E �� /��w ,g-.� ftao�naT.�stZ liar-+� Ta Ts��N��G-�l3es�ilfr�a� fl77-I 25 _4v4.;✓ ,- c H aST y`=uS /frrulr sd� OD0nn�pJS s�s�,� �vET�c.•,`Cta2S S �r t ��iti�s /�d.� cvwJT�,✓ vrr�L //—' /S SaL.o Tt}d— Nevi w /TH Trtg a2a,,)N-e) -STG yT=O--? (AIZ)L)Ado) CA,' Trt/S Lo -r- J( !r/ems 7-/7L- TD 6e r3o/L7- tj/Th'D✓T o v, o) spy aJ i s L�F�tT !.//LL THS w /GttT of AW A-OO/T/D NAL . /hn�tf JJa Ta Tt/� uistTc►'L T�t/3Le� .�'sus��cT' /7-C-)/44. Do ^6" 71 S FfarsL� ou��/L�S, Z -l /�✓s,�o 4&-�S / 7-7 h-7/Lri. y 87✓K n/ (.JEs3 T bSpT�''� ST %fs4'Y� ,La%5 ox Atea✓ /�00/TJa7J of Zf/cryA-$ TN M&A kt-T i//ttuii /N 7—i3Ad-41,-lc/ 64A/y0op? Ob Audi pInis*eLos- • • /a c AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: judy ashenbach [ashenbach@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 11:16 AM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: To The Honorable Mayer & City Council Members This letter is to let you know of our concerns regarding the development of another lot at the property next door to us; 2061 West 65th Street. When we purchased out home in 1975, we were told that lot was not a buildable lot and would not be developed because of stream and wet land. When Mr. & Mrs. Benz built there home this forced the water our way and we had to add additional drainage to our home. When they built, I watch the slab of their home being laid in water. The side of their lot that they built on is the driest part of that property. To add another home on that lot would mean more water problems for this street and home owners. I remember when city sewer was installed and the city had to pump water from under the street for several weeks before installing sewer. Please take our concerns to all concerned. Thank you for your service and thank you for taking the time to serve us and the City of Chanhassen. Sincerely, Bill and Judy Ashenbach 2041 West 75th Street Chanhassen, MN Phone 952-474-6821 jashenbach @Hotmail.com MEMORANDUM CITY OF TO: CIIANIIASSEN FROM: 7700 Market Boulevard PC Box 147 DATE: Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax 952.2271110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.2271404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952,227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952 227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Shanneen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner June 8, 2015 lLf-5:� SUBJECT: Approve Resolution Amending Conditions of Approval to Moline's Addition Metes and Bounds Subdivision — Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition — Planning Case #2014-30 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a resolution amending the conditions of an approval to Moline's Addition Metes and Bounds Subdivision — Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition as shown in the amended staff report dated June 8, 2015, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council present. On November 24, 2014 the Chanhassen City Council approved a metes and bounds subdivision dividing Lot 3, Block 1, Moline's Addition into Parcels 1 and 2, Block 1, subject to conditions. One of the conditions of approval was that the applicant was required to install the sewer and water service to the vacant property (Parcel 2) and submit a $10,000 escrow to ensure that the work was complete and the street properly restored. Subsequent to the November 24, 2014 meeting, the applicant requested that this condition be removed so that the person(s) purchasing and building on the property would be responsible for the installation of the sewer and water service, including the necessary road repair to West 65th Street. The staff report has been edited and conditions of approval amended to reflect this change. All new information will appear in bold. ATTACHMENT 1. Resolution. 2. Staff Report dated June 8, 2015 (bold/strikethrough format). g:\plan\2014 planning cases\2014-30 2061 west 65th street metes & boundsUevised executive summaryAoc Chanhassen is a Community for Life - P �" T day iqd Pian ca fc, TDmcucm SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: June 8, 2015 MOTION BY: RESOLUTION NO: 2015 - SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF A METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION CREATING TWO PARCELS LOCATED AT 2061 WEST 65TH STREET WHEREAS, John J. and Kimberly E. Corey have requested a subdivision of the property into two lots of 15,165 square feet and 15,159 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council held a public hearing on November 24, 2014, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance and approved Resolution No. 2014-78; and WHEREAS, one of the conditions of approval was that the applicant was required to install the sewer and water service to the vacant property (Parcel 2) and submit a $10,000 escrow to ensure that the work was complete and the street properly restored; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the approval, the applicant requested this condition be removed so that the person(s) purchasing and building on the property would be responsible for the installation of the sewer and water service, including the necessary road repair to West 65th Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby amends the conditions of approval to the metes and bounds subdivision for property located at 2061 West 65th Street (legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, Carver County, Minnesota) as follows: Buildine 1. The existing structure on proposed Parcel 2 must be provided with sanitary sewer connection — permit required. 2. Proposed Parcel 1 must be provided with separate sewer and water services (permit required) before a building permit is issued. Enaineerine The City Attorney shall draft and the developer shall execute a "Grant of Permanent Easement for Public Drainage and Utility Purposes" document. This document shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 2. A roadway, drainage and utility easement must be dedicated over the portion of the existing cul-de-sac within the property and 15 feet beyond the edge of the mad. This easement shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. Prior to recording the subdivision the developer shall pay the $45 GIS fee: $25 (subdivision) plus $10/parcel. 4. Sewer and water hookup charges are due for the new lot Parcel 1, a portion of which shall be collected before the metes and bounds subdivision is recorded: Water: 1 unit x $1,957/unit = $1,957 Sewer: 1 unit x $677/unit = $677 The remainder of the sewer and water hookup charges for Parcel 1 shall be collected with the building permit. 5. If the final subdivision submittals are received after 2015, all fees shall be recalculated based on the rates in effect at that time. 6. A plumbing permit is required for the private storm sewer; the plumbing inspector will inspect the connection to the city storm sewer manhole. 7. On Parcel 1, the proposed home style as required by City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (iii) is a slab -on -grade home. Based on Interstate Geotechnical Engineering's observations, the groundwater elevation is 1.8 feet below the ground elevation of the soil boring. The developer must verify the surface elevation of the boring location to determine the elevation of the groundwater; the lowest floor must be minimum three feet above that elevation per City Code Section 18130 (4) 2 (i). 8. Before a building permit is issued for Parcel 1, the water service and sanitary sewer service must be installed. The sanitary sewer is within West 65's Street, therefore installation of a sanitary sewer service will require cutting into and patching the City street. A Work in Right of Way permit must be obtained before installing the water and sanitary sewer service; an escrow for street repair to ensure that the street is restored shall be part of the permit requirements. The estimated cost of the street repair was $10,000 in 2014. The escrow amount shall be adjusted according to the construction costs at the time the Work in Right of Way permit is issued 9. Approval of the subdivision is contingent upon the applicant or property owner entering into a development contract with the City. 2 10. Third Parties. Tbird parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developer's obligations under this Contract. The City shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City's failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. 11. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. 12. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. 13. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developer's request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make as written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. 14. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 15. Assignability. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or both lots. 16. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer finther agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. 17. Soil Correction. The property owner or his/her contractor shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi -lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. 18. As -Built Lot Surveys. An as -built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as -built lot survey must he prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as - built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as -built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as -built escrow withheld until all work is complete. Environmental Resource Specialist 1. Tree protection fencing will be required around any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading and located at the drip lines of the trees. 2. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with City Code Section 18-61. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City's approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (2'/z) inches caliper, either bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line). The lot purchaser shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways on each lot utilizing a minimum of four (4) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the lot. If these improvements are not in place at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested, a financial guarantee of $750.00 in the form of cash or letter of credit shall be provided to the City. These conditions must then be complied with within two (2) months after the certificate of occupancy issued, except that if the certificate of occupancy is issued between October 1 through May 1 these conditions must be complied with by the following July 1 st. Upon expiration of the time period, inspections will be conducted by City staff to verify satisfactory completion of all conditions. City staff will conduct inspections of incomplete items with a $50.00 inspection fee deducted from the escrow fund for each inspection. After satisfactory inspection, the financial guarantee shall be returned. If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The City may also use the escrowed funds for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. Parks 1. Park fees of $5,800.00 shall be paid for each new single-family lot prior to the recording of the property deed. Plannine 1. Deeds shall submitted to the city for review and recorded at Carver County for the two parcels. 0 2. A building permit shall not be issued unless all soil corrections have been completed as indicated in the attached exhibits titled "Subsurface Soil Investigation" dated October 25, 2014 and November 13, 2014. 3. Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 4. Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 505.02, Subd. 1. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 5. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developer represents that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. 6. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: a) City of Chanhassen; b) State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; c) United States Army Corps of Engineers; d) Watershed District(s); e) Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. 7. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. Water Resource Coordinator 1. Total surface water management fees due prior to recording the property deed are $1,914.55. 2. Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be furnished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 8th day of June, 2015. Todd Gerhardt, City Clerk/Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor Chanhassen City Council — June 8, 2015 2. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated May 19, 2015 3. Approval of Park and Recreation Department Annual Report 4. Metes and Bounds Subdivision of Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, 2061 West 65th Street, Applicant: John Brudas/Owner: John Corey: a. Resolution #2015-35: Approval of Resolution Amending the Metes and Bounds Subdivision b. Approval of Amendment to Development Contract 5. Item Deleted 6. Resolution #2015-36: Approve Quote for Standby Generator Emissions Upgrade, East Water Treatment Plant Approval of Amendment to Section 20-19(f) of Chanhassen City Code Regarding Hours of Liquor Sales on Sundays 8. Award of Bid, Audit Services for Audit Years 2015-2017 9. Dayco Concrete CUP/SPA Amendments: Approval of Amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2001-02 and Site Plan Agreement 2001-05 to Allow Screened Outdoor Storage on Property Zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD), Located at 1850 Lake Drive West, Applicant/Owner: LDW Properties 10. Resolution #2015-37: Approve Resolution of Support of an Application to the State of Minnesota Job Creation Fund from a Private Business (Nicknamed Project Polly Il) 11. Award of Bid, Partial Roof Replacement at Fire Station No. 1 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: CHANHASSEN LIBRARY ANNUAL REPORT, HEIDI HOKS. Mayor Laufenburger: We do have one visitor who has scheduled a presentation to us. I welcome Heidi Hoks who is the librarian for Carver County, is that correct Ms. Hoks? Heidi Hoks: The Library Director. Mayor Laufenburger: Library Director for Carver County. Heidi Hoks: Yes, thank you. SCANNED t4 -3v CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JUNE 8, 2015 Mayor Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilwoman Tjomhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Paul Oehme, Kate Aanenson, Todd Hoffman, Greg Sticha, and Roger Knutson PUBLIC PRESENT: Heidi Hoks Waconia Kathy Bognanni Chanhassen Library James Neilson 118 East Main Street, Anoka Tyler Stevens 6330 Hazeltine Boulevard Ben Gowen 6440 Hazeltine Boulevard Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you and welcome to this council meeting. To those present in the chambers, as well as those of you that are watching on Mediacom Channel 8 at home, nice to have you here. Our first action tonight is related to the agenda. Council members are there any modifications to the agenda? And if not we will proceed with the agenda as printed. Alright, that's exactly what we'll do then. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Laufenburger: We do have a public announcement this evening. Can you hear me alright Nann? Okay. I believe at the last council meeting we accepted a large check from KleinBank for their support of our community summer concert series so I want to extend an invitation to everyone to the 2015 KleinBank Summer Concert Series presented by the City of Chanhassen. Join us on Thursdays beginning June 18th through August 13th at City Center Park Plaza. All concerts are free for everyone to enjoy and they feature music from a variety of genres. Most concerts begin at about 7:00 p.m., weather permitting of course. However there is one children's show that begins at 11:00 a.m. so pack a picnic. Invite your family and friends out for some great outdoor music and this event is sponsored by KleinBank of Chanhassen and presented by the City of Chanhassen so I encourage all residents and people from surrounding communities to come out and enjoy some music in the out of doors. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: Approve City Council Minutes dated May 26, 2015 CITY of CHANHASSEN 7700 Markel Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 MEMORANDUM Q t TO: Paul Oehme, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer a,-' DATE: June 8, 2015 D -Lf SUBJECT: Metes & Bounds Subdivision of Lot 3, Block 2 of Moline's Addition: Approve Development Contract PROPOSED MOTION "The City Council approves the Development Contract for the Metes & Bounds Subdivision of Lot 3, Block 2 of Moline's Addition." City Council approval requires a simple majority vote of the City Council present. Finance The metes and bounds subdivision was originally approved on November 24, 2014. One of Phone: 952.227.1140 the conditions of approval was that the applicant was required to install the sewer and water Fax:952.2271110 service to the vacant property (Parcel 2) and submit a $10,000 escrow to ensure that the work Park & Recreation was complete and the street properly restored. Subsequent to the November 24, 2014 Phone: 952.227.1120 meeting, the applicant requested that this condition be removed so that the person(s) Fax: 952.227.1110 purchasing and building on the property would be responsible for the installation of the sewer and water service, including the necessary road repair to West 65th Street. Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard There are no public improvements required for this subdivision. Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 The attached development contract incorporates the conditions of approval for the metes and bounds subdivision and the soils investigation reports that were submitted by the applicant. Planning & The cash fees for this project total $10,393.55. A breakdown of the cash fee is shown on Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Page SP -2 of the development contract. Fax: 952.227.1110 Staff recommends that the development contract dated June 8, 2015 be approved conditioned Public Works upon the applicant entering into the development contract and pay a cash fee of $10,393.55. 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Attachment: Development Contract dated June 8, 2015 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us G:\ENG\PROJEM\T-Z\West 65th St Metes & Bowds\20150608 approve dc.doc Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED 14-3U CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 2 OF MOLINE'S ADDITION DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) 181797v1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL PROVISIONS PAGE 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL................................................................................ SP -1 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL............................................................................ SP -1 3. DEVELOPMENT PLANS.................................................................................................SP-1 4. IMPROVEMENTS............................................................................................................. SP -1 5. NOTICE..............................................................................................................................SP-1 6. OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS.................................................................................... SP -2 ia1rnvl I CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 2, MOLINE'S ADDITION AGREEMENT dated June 8, 2015 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and JOHN J. COREY AND KIMBERLY E. COREY, husband and wife (the "Developers"). 1. Request for Subdivision Approval. The Developers have asked the City to approve a metes and bounds subdivision of Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition (referred to in this Contract as the "subdivision"). The land is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2. Conditions of Subdivision Approval. The City hereby approves the subdivision on condition that the Developers enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the subdivision documents with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 30 days after the City Council approves the subdivision. 3. Development Plans. The subdivision shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. The plans are: Plan A: Lot Split Exhibit for 2061 West 65" Street approved May 26, 2015, prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. Plan B: Grading and Erosion Control Plan dated October 31, 2014, prepared by Sathre- Bergquist, hmc. Plan C: Utility Plan dated October 31, 2014, prepared by Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. 4. Improvements. The party that secures a building permit for Parcel 1 shall be responsible for installing the improvements shown on Plan B and Plan C and shall acquire all necessary permits and post all necessary securities to perform the work. 5. Notice. Required notices to the Developers shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developers, their employees or agents, or mailed to the Developers by registered mail at the following address: 181797A SP -1 John J. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey 6409 Oxbow Bend Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone: 952-227-1100. 6. Other Special Conditions. A. FEES The $10,393.55 cash fee and the fully -executed development contract must be submitted before the subdivision is recorded. The cash fees were calculated as follows: Partial Payment of Water Hook -Up Fee: 1 unit x $1,957/unit = $1,957.00 Partial Payment of Sewer Hook -Up Fee: 1 unit x $677/unit = $677.00 GIS fee: $25 (subdivision) + $10/parcel x 2 parcels = $45.00 Park Dedication Fee: 1 dwelling x $5,800/dwelling = $5,800.00 Surface Water Management fee: $1,914.55 Total Cash Fee= $10,393.55 B. BUILDING OFFICIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The existing structure on proposed Parcel 2 must be provided with sanitary sewer connection — permit required. 2. Proposed Parcel 1 must be provided with separate sewer and water services (permit required) before a building permit is issued. C. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The City Attorney shall draft and the developer shall execute a "Grant of Permanent Easement for Public Drainage and Utility Purposes" document. This document shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 2. A roadway, drainage and utility easement must be dedicated over the portion of the existing cul-de-sac within the property and 15 feet beyond the edge of the road. This easement shall be recorded with the metes and bounds subdivision. 3. Prior to recording the subdivision the developer shall pay the $45 GIS fee: $25 (subdivision) plus $10/parcel. 181797v1 SP -2 4. Before a building permit is issued for Parcel 1, the water service and sanitary sewer service must be installed. The sanitary sewer is within West 65's Street, therefore installation of a sanitary sewer service will require cutting into and patching the City street. A Work in Right of Way permit must be obtained before installing the water and sanitary sewer service; an escrow for street repair to ensure that the street is restored shall be part of the permit requirements. The estimated cost of the street repair was $10,000 in 2014. The escrow amount shall be adjusted according to the construction costs at the time the Work in Right of Way permit is issued. 5. Sewer and water hookup charges are due for Parcel 1, a portion of which shall be collected before the metes and bounds subdivision is recorded: Water: 1 unit x $1,957/unit = $1,957 Sewer: 1 unit x $677/unit = $677 The remainder of the sewer and water hookup charges for Parcel 1 shall be collected with the building permit. 6. If the final subdivision submittals are received after 2015, all fees shall be recalculated based on the rates in effect at that time. 7. A plumbing permit is required for the private storm sewer, the plumbing inspector will inspect the connection to the city storm sewer manhole. 8. On Parcel 1, the proposed home style as required by City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (iii) is a slab -on -grade home. Based on Interstate Geotechnical Engineering's observations, the groundwater elevation is 1.8 feet below the ground elevation of the soil boring. The Developers must verify the surface elevation of the boring location to determine the elevation of the groundwater, the lowest floor must be minimum three feet above that elevation per City Code Section 18-40 (4) 2 (i). 9. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developers' obligations under this Contract. The City shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City's failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. 10. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. 11. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City s failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. 181797v1 SP -3 12. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. After the Developers have completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developers' request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make as written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. 13. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 14. Assignability. The Developers may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developers' obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developers sell one or both lots. 15. Soil Conditions. The Developers acknowledge that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developers may make use of such property. The Developers further agree that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. 16. Soil Correction. The owner of Parcel l is responsible for the necessary soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developers concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi -lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. 17. As -Built Lot Surveys. An as -built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as -built lot survey must be prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as -built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as -built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as -built escrow withheld until all work is complete. 181797v1 SP -4 D. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SPECIALIST CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Tree protection fencing will be required around any preserved trees. It shall be installed prior to grading and located at the drip lines of the trees. 2. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with City Code Section 18-61. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City's approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (2'h) inches caliper, either bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line). The lot purchaser shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways on each lot utilizing a minimum of four (4) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the lot. If these improvements are not in place at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested, a financial guarantee of $750.00 in the form of cash or letter of credit shall be provided to the City. These conditions must then be complied with within two (2) months after the certificate of occupancy issued, except that if the certificate of occupancy is issued between October 1 through May 1 these conditions must be complied with by the following July 1 st. Upon expiration of the time period, inspections will be conducted by City staff to verify satisfactory completion of all conditions. City staff will conduct inspections of incomplete items with a $50.00 inspection fee deducted from the escrow fund for each inspection. After satisfactory inspection, the financial guarantee shall be returned. If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The City may also use the escrowed funds for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. E. PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR CONDITION OF APPROVAL: Park fees of $5,800.00 shall be paid for each new single-family lot prior to the recording of the property deed. F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Deeds shall submitted to the city for review and recorded at Carver County for the two parcels. 2. A building permit shall not be issued unless all soil corrections have been completed as indicated in Exhibits `B" and "C" titled "Subsurface Soil Investigation" dated October 25, 2014 and November 13, 2014, respectively. 3. Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developers. Thereafter, 181797vl SP -5 notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 4. Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Mina Stat. § 505.02, Subd. 1. The Developers' surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 5. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developers represent that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. 6. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developers shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: a) City of Chanhassen; b) State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; c) United States Army Corps of Engineers; d) Watershed District(s); e) Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. 7. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developers shall famish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. G. WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Total surface water management fees due prior to recording the property deed are $1,914.55. 2. Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be furnished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] rsirnvi SP -6 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 1W (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) Denny Laufenburger, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2015, by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC 181797vl SP -7 DEVELOPERS: John J. Corey Kimberly E. Corey STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2015, by John J. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey, husband and wife. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-227-1100 181797vi SP -8 EXHIBIT "A" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Lot 3, Block 2 of Moline's Addition according to the recorded plat thereof in Carver County, Minnesota. 181797vl EXMIT "B" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT 181797vl Interstate Geotechnicai Engineering, Inc Patrick J Hines, PE £ 167 100- Si S Collar Cro MN 55016 (6;1)4 W5770 25 October 2014 Mr James Rudos 14846 Timber Hill Road Minnetonka MN 55345 Re: Subsurface Soil Investigation Proposed Single Family Residence W of 2061 W 6r St, Chanhassen, Minn In accordance with your authorization, I have completed the above referenced investigation to determine site suitability for the proposed construction. A summary of my findings together with boring logs and my conclusions and recommendations are presented in the enclosed report. I found, as you already have been briefed, more than usual problems with the site. There is a total of 5'1,'& 6:/,'at the locations of Boring 1 & Probe I A, respectively, of unsuitable soil in the form of topsoil fill, general and varying fill, and buried original humus. Below at first is a low sand content lean clay, generally dark in color, saturated, very soft to soft (w/ depth). It is "normally consolidated" (consolidated enough to only support its ewn weight, not additional weight of fill soils or structures above). The overburdening fill has not been inplace long enough to force further consolidation. The moisture content test in this material indicated nearly 42%, high for a lean clay. This material extends only from 5% to 7' in Boring 1, but from 6'/,'to 8'/r' in Probe 1 A. The first 9" of this material in Probe I A is very soft and is a borderline marl material. All of the aforementioned materials are unsuitable for structure support should be removed. I do acknowledge that excavators are often reluctant to excavate further once the buried organic soil is cleared, so understandings should be inplace at the time of gathering bids. Base soil below at first is a lean clay, a little sandy, dark gray, satw-ated, rather soft to medium. It has inclusions of a poorly graded (biased finer grained) sand with a few fines, also dark gray, satumted, loose to firm. Deepest soil, commencing at 1 I' in Boring 1, is a lean clay, rather sandy, dark gray, low gravel content, medium. Theses matenais arc glacial till. The sand inclusions in the upper portion are glacial outwash. All of these base mineral soils are suitable for residential construction, with conditions. Refusal to auger advancement was not encountered by boring termination depth of 23', indicating lack of bedrock to this level. Very importantly, groundwater was found in the main Boring at 1.8' (elev 96VJ. It is aquifer groundwater, but marginally so. It appears to be contained primarily in the sand inclusions at 7'-. But it also is coming from the upper soft and very soft clay, possibly from 181797v1 Mr James Rudos 2' October 2014 Page 2 the lower organic soil. Proper construction on the site (removing the softer lean clay, promoting good site drainage) will mitigate some of this. Thus, water found presently can be regarded as a maximum level. Slab gmdc of the proposed residence should be set in accordance with City requirements utilizing this level. I recommend complete removal of all unsuitable soil which is likely to be the fill and buried organic soil as encountered plus the overly soft clay found in both the boring and probe. While this amounts only to another I';; in the vicinity of Boring 1, it is another 2'+ in the vicinity of Probe IA. As indicated, excavators may be reluctant to excavate below organic soil level, but it is necessary (see longer discussion in the report). It is so important that full time inspection of the excavation by a soils engineer may be necessary. Of course, other zones of unsuitable soil not represented by the boring and probe could still be encountered due to the nature of small volume random sampling. Any other depths or zones of unsuitable soil should be removed as well. You could lower footings somewhat so that you have to provide less ovcmizing and not stray onto the neighbor's property. But footings here should not be lowered so much as to rest directly upon the suitable base soil as it is only marginally suitable. You need a little fill (2' is recommended) to spread footing loads out with depth. Footings may be generally designed allow ing the usual 2000 psf fuundatiun bearing capacity, which will likely result in normal strip or pad footings. Special attention is again drawn to the advisory that excavations be examined by the Soils Engineer to verify soil boring results and to document adequacy of site preparation. Again this is very important as how much soft/very soft clay must be removed will require a high degree of field judgment. Fill, as used, should be tested for compaction adequacy. Soil correction should not be abated below slabs in any manner (ic, do not let the excavator try to "trench around" slab areas). Thank you for the opportunity to have been of service. If you have any questions on this, or if I can be of assistance in any additional capacity, do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, ATE GEOTECf1TIICAL ENGINEERING, Inc President PE RPI"M pli/SC 181797v1 SLBSURFACE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE W o(2061 W 65' St, Cha 1n tam, 4Annesota Prepared by: Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc 5167 100° Street S Cottage Grove MN 55016 25 October 2014 181797NI !nin4tr (:solahPsalneer5ut, Ix FC,xk J 4ilPE t161100'stSt5 cocats 0ns6 55016 (612)41457n REPORToF SUBSURFACE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATICN FoR PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE West of 2061 W 65" St, Chanhassen, Minnesota 25 October 2014 SCOPE OF SERVICES Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, hereafter referred to as "IGE", was retained by James Rudest hereafter referred to as re "Client", to perform a subsurface soil investigation on a parcel of land located as noted in the above title block. The purpose of this investigation is, as this is a ":et split", to identify and evaluate soil and water properties associated with the site wits rem t to construmtiig a single farm y residence thereon. One primary soil boring was perforated hand and powe7 flight auger methods to a depth of 23' within the project area. in addition, iabo ato-y tests were rur upon selected soil samples, and a shallower probe was put down to farther delineate depth and extent of unsuitable soil. From the resulting data, conclusions are drawn regarding site suitability for the proposed use and recom^tcnda:ions arc developed, based upon in formation gathered to date within the presently authorized scope of services, for site correction procedures and foundation and slab design. SITE OBSERVATION The general area is suburban residential in nature, moderate in elevation. Vicinity structures vary in age and design, but are generally newer, in good condition. What is noted, however, is that depths of installation seem to be rather shallow. This site is rattler level in terrain pattern, flat from street gradc.'TMcre is an abandoned wastewater treatment mound on the site. The site is covered mainly by she- maintained grasses, with trees and brush, mostly to the rear, and landscaping plants at various locations. Proposed construction on the site is a single fortify residence. It most likely will be of slab -on -grade or crawl space design configuration with attached garage. LocatiL cn was not known, but most likely it will be at setbacks similarto those in the vicinity, possibly slightly more to the front. Given site grade versus strwt level, the site will be buil: up P-2' in any event for positive drainage. It is assumed that the residence will be of usual wood frame design with most building loads transferred to exterior and interior strip footings at frost protection depth (3.5' or greater below finished grade). This type of structure imparts relatively light loads onto foundation soil. BORING LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS The boring and probe locations we ` determined by IGE and were based upon likely location of the proposed construction, initial impressions and PssumpGons, axcssability, obstacles, ctc. IGE also determined depn'ts based upon nature of the proposed work, usual and accepted practice and results of the investigation as it proceeded. All work was 181797vl W of 1061 W 65"S4 C'hanhmen. Minn -2- performed in an attempt to obtain geotechnical data representative of the site. Refcr to the attached sketch for boring locations. In addition, they were marked in the field with lath. As the west property line location was net totally assured, borings should be more accurately located in the course of future site surveys. Ground surface elevation at the boring and probe locations and at a few key topographic points was determine:: to Lhe nearest 0.1' using an ennginee's level and referenced to top nut of a fire hydrant on the socth side of 65i° St W, approximately :50' west of the area investigated, located as shown on the referenced sketch. As there was no conveniently available sea level datum benchmark nearby, this temporary bench mark was assigned an arbitrary reference elevation of 100.00. Elevations are shown on bore logs and on the site sketch. Accuracy of this should not be taken as any greater than the methods used would imply. Again, in the course of further site surveys, elevations of the boring and probe should be more accurately determined in accordance with a sea level datum. FIELD INVESTIGATION The boring and probe were primarily accomplished by the Powe. Flight Auger (FA) and Hard Auger (HA) methods in accordance with ASTM D 1452, "Standard Practice for Soil Investigation and Sampling by Auger Borings". As the hand auger up_oer portion of the main boring was advanced in sandy soil, one supplemental test was performed using the "Dynamic Cone Penetrometer^ (DCP) method. These procedures are described in attachments at the back of the text portion of this report. The first attachment also describes the soil classification system used (Unified - chart attached) and method of groundwater measurement. A Professional Engineer personally performed the boring and probe and immediately classified soils in the field. Soil strength was determined by said engineer mostly on an empirical basis by such means of drilling ease or difficulty, nature of recovered soil samples, consultation of laboratory and DCP test results, etc. Some samples were bagged and returned to the soils laboratory for N_^.her examination and possible testing. Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with ASTM standards. SOIL. BORING RESULTS Attached is a log for the boring together with a key explaining terms and entries on the log sheets. Results of the shallower probe are given in more surr-nary form on the continuation sheet of the log for the main boring. The depth of individual layers of soils may vary somewhat from what is shown on the logs due to the inexact nature of auger sampling and, most importantly, the occurrence of trarusition between soil layers. Also be advised that soil conditions not at the boring and probe locations may vary. Laboratory test (moisture content) results arc given in the "w" column, of the baring log at the appropriate relative locations. The DCP test result is given m the right -most column of the boring log, again at the appropriate relative location. The borings show a condition of fill over original organic soil, with overly soft soil below. The f 1 is 2'/4'in the main boring, slightly less in the probe, and consists of topsoil fill [a variably sandy organic lean clay (OL), black] and a mixed soil 911, most of it lean clay, somewhat sandy, dark in color (CL) with a little organic soil (OL). Bciow, to total depths of 5'/,'& 6'/,'in Boring 1 and Probe IA, respectively, is wast appears to be buried original humus, a lean clay, rather silty, highly organic (OL), black. In upper reaches it 181797vl W o'2061 W 65' 5, Chanhrnm Minn _r_ might be a borderline sapric peat The thickness together with the highly organic nature could mean that this originated in a shallow depth swamp. As a minimum, these soils are unsuitable for construction. Application of foundation loads upon them will undoubtedly result in differential settlement and loss of value of the new structure. In addition, modem building codes prohibit establishment of residential structures on or over organic or otherwise unsuitable soil. Below at fust in Boring 1 is a lean clay. a little sandy, very dark to dark gray (Cl.), saturated, very soft to soft (w/ depth). This appears to be a lacustrine (lake origir.) deposit. It is "normally consolidated" (consolidated enough to only support its own weight and original soil weight above, not additional weight of fill soils or structures above). The overburdening fill has not been inplace long enough, geologically, to force further consolidation. The moisture content test in this material is 41.9%, high for a lean clay of this nature. It is obviously near or over the liquid limit of this material (est 4001u+). In such a scenario, the material is very soft, prone to consolidation upon application of further loads. This material extends only from 5'/,'to T in Boring 1, but from 6'/,'to 8'/,'in Probe IA. The first 9" of this material in Probe 1 A is very soft and is a borderline marl material. Base soil below at first is a lean clay, a little sandy (CL), dark gray, saturated. rather soft to medium (confirmed by another moisture content test). It has inclusions of a poorl) graded (biased finer grained) sand with a few fines (SP), also dark gray, saturated, loose to firm (as per DCP test result). Deepest soil, commencing at 11' in Boring 1, is a lean clay, rather sandy, dark gray (CL), low gravel content, medium. Theses materials am glacial till. The sand inclusions in the upper portion are glacial outwash. All of these base mineral soils are suitable for residential construction, with conditions. Refusal to auger advancement was not encountered by power boring termination depth, elevation 75±, indicating lack of bedrock at least to this e'evation. Groundwater was found in the main boring as evidenced by standing water in the bore hole after a standard period of monitoring, depth 1.8' (elev 96'/x. This is a surprisingly high level given the moderate elevation of the area and its seemingly well drained nature. It is, however, aquifer groundwater, but marginally so. It appears to be contained primarily in the sand inclusions at T+. But it alsc is coming from the upper soft and very soft clay, possibly from the lower organic soil, once a void (the bore hole) became available. Proper construction on the site (removing the softer lean clay, promoting good site drainage) will mitigate some of this. Thus, water found presently can be regarded as a maximum level. It should be pointed out that most of the lower elevation sandier lean clay soils arc tochnlcallX saturated (all pores filled with water), but not waterbearina (capable of releasing this water). This is a normal condition for a soft to medium or better clay. As indicated, the upper lean clay soils, being soft to very soft, do release water. However, be advised, as explained in the attachment, that groundwater may still occur and vary according to various climatological and meteorological influences undetermined within the time frame, scope and budget allowed in this investigation. In addition, area development patterns and drainage alterations can influence soil moisture and groundwater. Bear in mind that indicated results are for time and conditions of testing only. Refer to the boring and probe log for a more detailed description of soils and moisture conditions encountered. 181797v1 W 0.'2001 W 6V S4 Chanbass"; Minn -4- CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon interpreted results of boring and probe logs, including laboratory tests, their relation to the planned work, and other information. Because the boring, probe and tests represent a small portion of the site in relation to the proposed area of work, ongoing review of construction should be tamed out. If excavations reveal subsurface soils of a different neture than, those observed in the boring and probe, or if the location or elevations or type of the plamted work are altered significantly, the Soils Engineer should becontracted for possibly revised recommendations or additional testing (see #6 below and the following "Limitations of Investigation"). 1. General Site Suitability-. Based upon interpreted results of the borings, it appears that the site has some limitations regarding suitability for constructor. These mainly consist of the presence of fill over buried original topsoil, soft to very soft clay below (thickness varying), high groundwater on the site and the need to adapt the site in general for the intended use. These limitations are correctable by adequate site correction, foundation engineering and further monitoring of soils as construction proceeds. 2. Initial Site Preparation: This analysis is based upon the proposed structure being, as indicated earlier, of slab - on -grade or crawl space design with attached garage, grade set to meet City requirements. Exterior footings will be at least 3'/1 below final grade. Interior footings could be at subslab level ifplaced upon properly compacted fill. Unless marginal soils are left below correction levels, some footings could be lowered if more convenient to deal with unsuitable soil levels. All organic, loose, frozen or otherwise unsuitable soil, uncontrolled fill, vegetation, debris and boulders (3"+) and, most importantly in this case, the soft to very soft lean clay, should be removed from the proposed building pad area, generally achieving the first naturally occurring suitable soil, likely a rather soft to medium or better somewhat sandy lean clay, with waterbearing sand inclusions. Bo•ing evidence suggests that this will amount to excavation depths of at least 7' and 8'/= at the locations of Boring I and Probe ]A, respectively. If working room is not adequate for safe excavation backslopes, or perhaps just to control excavation and filling extent, footings could be lowered somewhat so that proper oversizing and a safe backslope, not straying onto the neighbor's property, can be provided. But as base soils, even when corrected, are marginal at first, footings in this vicinity should not be lowered so much as to rest on or near base soil:. There should be at least 2' of properly compacted fill below footings to allow some spread of foundation load with depth. It is also noted that areas below slab areas should be corrected as well, not attempting to trench around them. Some discussion should be made about over -excavating out the soft to very soft lean clay. Excavators are often reluctant to do this once buried organic soil is cleared. Again it is pointed out that field indications plus a laboratory test indicate this material to be soft to very soft. It is estimated to have a coefficient of consolidation (cJ) of 0.15. Applying this to the thickness of the soft layer (1'-21 and considering likely new stresses, if this material were not removed, a long term settlement of approximately I" to 2" would result. This is 181797v1 W of 2061 W 65' St, Clurlu M lkbw -5- excessive for this structure. When obtaining excavation, bids, this overexcavation necessity should be clear to excavators so that problems, contractual or otherwise, are less likely to occur later. During the construction phase, the amount ofexcavation of overly soft clay will necessitate a high degree of judgment It is possible that full time observation by a soils engineer will be required Based upon the fact that the excavation wiil be below water level, water will enter and accumulate in the excavation. This water should be controlled, such as by summing or other means, so that the bottom of the excavation can be viewed and so that water does not interfere with compaction efforts in the lowest levels. It should again be emphasized, however, that the estimated depths of excavation of unsuitable soil given above are preliminary estimates based upon random but somewhat targeted auger tests These should be considered preliminary estimates only, to be verified by actual excavations. In fact, for construction quantity purposes, a small amount of additional estimated excavation depth should be added to that given in the logs to conservatively allow for variations and for inadvertent over -excavations which are impossible to avoid when power machinery is employed for the purpose. It is especially cautioned that there could be areas of unsuitable soil rot represented by the boring and probe to date. These zones could be grubbed out tree stump pis, an old basement, trash pits, borrow pits, test excavations, utility trenches, etc. Excavators should be especially aware of this possibility. Excavated organic material, uncontrolled fill, wet unstable soil or other soil contaminated with topsoil, vegetation, etc, should be disposed of offsite, or in landscaping areas, where the bearing of weight will not be required. There appears to be no opportunity to salvage excavated mineral soil for reuse as controlled fill as said excavated soil, even if mineral soil, will be cohesive, overmoist and difficult to work with The excavation contractor will likely import a granular fill. Refer to subsequent sections for more detailed and specific recommendations for site correction recommendations for each structural component. 3. Foundations: Forpurpesesofproposcdconstruction,foundationsandfilltosupportfoundationsmust rest upon and over mineral (non-organic) soils of adequate bearing value. For the proposed construction, a bearing capacity of 2000 pounds per square foot (psi) is typically targeted. However, most single family residences actually bear much less, even under maximum snow load This analysis of soil for foundation purposes is based upon the location, design configuration and grade indicated above. If there is any significant deviation from assumptions indicated herein, then these recommendations may have to be reconsidered. The site should be prepared as out!iaed in #2 above, removing unsuitable soil, including the overly soft clay that exists over the bui (ding pad area, pe: forming any further excavation as necessary, controlling water that may enter the excavation and placing controlled fill (minimum 2') as needed. This being done, pentmeter an d interior footings maybe generally designed allowing 2000 psf foundation bearing capacity (likely resulting in ordinaryspread or pad footings). This value is recommended on the basis of the fact that the footing areas will rest directly upon fill that has been compacted to the level specified in hS below. This 181797v W of MI W 65" St Cbmh. rn Minn -6- takes into account shear failure potential near footing levels and the nature of deeper soil regarding settlement. Fill, as required, should be placed, compacted, and tested as per the "Fill Placement" (#5) section following. The above should provide a factor of safety against foundation failure of approximately 3. Over-all and differential settlements should be less than 'Ir" and '/,", respectively. if footing conditions change from what has been assumed herein, further study and analysis would be necessary. If the site is graded to different levels than assumed above, if the type of building proposed change, or if soils of a significantly different nature are discovered during excavations, the Soils Engineer should be contacted for te-analysis and possibly revised recommendations. It is not recommended to place footings upon or over organic soil or any other unsuitable soil or to deviate from recommendations contained herein as excessive differential settlement of the structure could result. 4. Slabs: Slabs and fill to support slabs should also rest upon and over mineral soil of adequate densityto resist settlement. Based upon boring evidence, base mineral soils on the site, with uncontrolled fila, organic soil, vegetation and any other encountered unsuitable soil removed and with controlled fill placed thereon as necessary are adequate for slab support. It is not recommended to abate site preparation below slabs ir. ar.y manner. Slabs should have clearance from maximum anticipated aquifer groundwater level and should be protected ftom intrusion by surface waters. As indicated above, floorlevel of this stricture should be set in accordance with City requirements, utilizing the level of grcuundwater found as a tttazimum level. Good site drainage; both at the time ofconstmrtion and for the life of the structure, is recommended. 5. Fill Placement: Fill material, as required, should be mineral soil, free of debris, boulders and organic material, of rich suitable moisture content that it can be readily compacted to specified levels. Fill should be placed and compacted in a manner that Will allow complete compaction ofc±e total fill layer to 95% of Standard Maximum Density according to ASTM D 698. Frozec material should not be used in fill construction, not should any part of the completed fill be allowed to freeze. A soil compaction test should be conducted for every two feet of fill in appropriate segments cf the area If crushed rock or any other very coarse granular soil or aggregate (>300/a 3/4" or coarser) is used, the above Standard Maximum Density would not be applicable. In this case, the fill should be compacted to 60% of Maxim Index Density according to ASTM D 4253. Top of fill should extend at least one foot horizontally beyond the a'ructure pad or footing limits. The fill surface may then extend downward and outward on a 1:1 slope to competent soil. It is upon this basis that required oversizing should be computed. 181797v1 W of 2161 W W St, Chwhan.-n. Mac -7- 6. Insxction and Tcstina: The Client should retain a geotechnical engineering firm to inspect excavations, make field judgments as to subsoil adequacy, and to carry out a program of field and laboratory testing of engineered fill and possibly other materials. This firm should bear full responsibility for knowledge of contents of this report and for proper interpretation and correlation of data, and be prepared to make any further analysis as necessary. Again, this is especially necessary in this case due to the high degree of judgment necessary regarding first encountered clay soils. 7. Final Site T000araohv: Final soil surfaces should be graded to provide adequate drainage from strictures and hard surfaces so that as little slater as possible infiltrates into soils adjacent to the structure. LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, has prepared this report using an ordinary level of care and in accordance with generally accepted foundation and soil engineering practices. Because the boring, probe and tests represent only a small portion of the total site and for other reasons, Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, does not warrant that the boring, probe and tests are necessarily representative of the entire site but only of the boring, probe and test locations at the time of investigation. No warranty of the site is mode or implied. The scope of this report is limited strictly to geotechnical issues which include establishment of soil profile and only those conclusicns expressly made. Please note that this work is not intended to document the presence or absence of any environmental contaminants at the site, nor for identifying applicable local, state or federal laws or regulations of a non -geotechnical nature which may or may not be applicable to this site. Further, Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, cannot be held responsible for facs not disclosed. The bore holes have backfilled the as well as possible using native cuttings. While the deeper Boring 1 did not produce an Environmental Bore Hole as defined by Minnesota Department of Health regulations, Bentonite was added to the cuttings during the backfilling process. However, some continuing settlement may occur if construction does not take place in the near future. If settlement docs occur, the Client should backfill with additional soil. This report and all supporting information is furnished only to the Client and his assigns for the designated purpose. No representations to other parties or for other uses are made. Soil samples retrieved during the investigation process were classified in the field by a Soils Engineer. Most of them were immediately discarded. Samples returned to the laboratory will be held fora period of 30 days unless a request is received to retain them for a longer period. 181797vI W of 2061 w 66' SL Cbmhanm Mum -8- ENGIN'EER'S CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. INTERSTATE GEOTECHMCAL ENGINEERING, Inc ,r Patrick 1 Hines, PE, President� �raNaPG �a Date Registration No. 12086 € :y ( 126!6 a Proofed by: SC c WAIF e� E_ s OF 181797v1 METHOD OF INVESTIGATION AUGER BORINGS The Auger Boring proceicre is one of the simplest methods of sol: -I- vestigation and sampling. Its limitations are that recovered sarplee are disturbed samples, and that depth of possible investigation is limited by various factors. Depending upon skill of the operator or crew chief, various engineering properties of soil, such as soil profile, estimated inplace strength, etc, may be determined by this method. It may also be used to retrieve samples for laboratory testing and determination of suitability of soil for other purposes.This describes the most often procedures used. In this procedure, augers are advanced into the ground by hydraulic/ mechanical means. At intervals, usually 5', the auger withdrawn and soil somples are retrieved and classified, retaining samples zs necessary for ffi.rther analysis. Record data includes depth to changes in strata, descrip- tion of soil in each major stratum, groundwater depth or elevation where found, and other Information. This is in accordance with the American. Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Designation: D 1452-80, "Standard Practice for Sail Investigation and Sampling by Auger Borings". Sometimes, hand auger borings of various types are used to accomplish the same purpose. However, penetration depth is usually limited. Its advan- tage is greater accuracy and the fact that a hand sugar boring may be the only type possible where access Is limited for power .,u.zer machinery. (aver) 181797vl Al;a�nmcnt to Lngln"ang itePar, Interstate ilmreclmilai trigineenng, Int METHOD OF 1N v m t lUA I LUN Dynamic Cone penetrometer tie !h tannic Cene Penetrometer (L)LY) procedure is an inereasmgly accepted method to investigate sod to lirruted zones, to augment existing testing, or to teat in relatively isolated or inaccessible auras It is a relatively oghtweight device that evaluates sod consistency and density It is "dynamic", versus static, in that it utilizes a lalling weight in the testing. the device utilizes a 15a steel ring weight telling 20' on an E -rod slide (ser sketch below). At the end of the E -rod assembly is a specially shaped cone that is driven into the soil by repeated drops of the hammer on the anvil. The cote is slightly enlarged a: its base to minimize shad resistance above. The test is either made at existing surface level, but most likely through an augered hole (3ee separate "Auger Borings" procediae). Soil profile is established through this latter procedure. Attest depth, the cone is seated 2" (the "set") into undisturbed soil for proper embedment. The cone point is then further driven 1'/,' by the I5b hammer dropping 20'. The blows to drive the cone I'/,' into the soil are counted and recorded. Sometimes, a second and third penchation can be made in this same set By succassively advancing the bore hole and adding rods, tests can be made at variou levels. This procedure fray be cued to depths of up to 15 or 20 fat Red ,n—, ...0 Ie* -1-1 awl ..", 1+e N.a Sliding Drv* Hamner 181797v1 Cone Point ISI797vI UNUTED SOM CLASSMCAT(ON H.p nmo. G'fOYr T!riwl .a,w tiew+,pf tlwvMDo. vYw,. wil.i P..Y rw w.rw. II,tr v ro M1Y ; D. D.0. or 13 ri�i 3 ! j ;� i ' � 3 j 1 i V. ES t i i � t i w's'Itf C.veY. pa.e4�ur�dJ Mo n M We -A-11. d tlun • AM -A" r .un Y I Y...a..�•.nb r.w .a•e nc�ny ,.. a.tl n,nee� aoc C4.e1 N•a4 �..ef ura.�.. �u,etr.t Yrw .hw-A' ( sw wdpwND0. a., •. C• • D'o. I \� 3 b : t E PCZ �1��6 lF sr a.�a. wok �w . A,s w n•nul .n n. '. r,w.a.+. tx sw _ ��C ry • ib rr. w.a AwC Annfwl I,.w Im. IMYr.1.lY 14M� 1..Y NM,YIe rod: Y.0 w/ Rt�OM Y� K A.w�.l wc.4.. •A� IQr,n W a./ wn .« mt wN. r� �. ♦Yr v a.•n R A ,Va puo. V y water Ae fLi Z Y : i � CL i. IwAr.. nwM mn. OM ya1 L.ar 11.•W + • awr « 31 i 2 = . c 6 ] _ a1M •waswww r .IM. w v, w•. aa. .., . C CN Ywp.r ,yn M ISI/, Mw M 0 M >0 ]0 ON O/wft A.a.I ..lAw a bo pb n . E _ t.w4 l ti t.. .. 70 .i Probe 1A _ Rlev - 97.8 Barin` No 1 11" - 98.1 u 66th Street _ _ bitumlmue n¢E _ U LOCATIONS OF SOIL BORINGS REM MARX, Top nut of fire horaat on south nide _{ _ of street. approz on east If eztesde! of ""rear" lot; Slav— 100.00 (shitwy) Patrick J Bines. PC 8167 100th St -S Cottage Grove 101 55016 Proposed Single Family Residence Ment of 2061 li 66th Street Chanhassen, Minnesota Client: James Rudos Minnetonka, Minn SOIL BOBSSG LOG 6t 5 8367 1001H Patrick J Hines. PIE Cortege Grove MN 55016 Proposed Single Eeaily Reat once PROJECT: west of 2061 w Agth St, Chanhassen, Minn LOG OF BORING NO: I DEPT14 SURFACE ELEVATION: 98 1 SAMPLE LAS S OTHER TESTS IN -- GEOLOGY N WS LL FEET DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION M TYPE R W E. F.L. met I -FAN CLAY, variably sandy, Organic (OL Topsoils 1 BA Black, w/ tr's mineral Soil, Fill l very mist, loose to firm 2w/ Fill BA t Derk Croy (Q.) a little Organic Soil. w/ R Lc to very moist, 1®e to fim_ 3� CLAY, rather silty, Organic (OL) Buried 3 BA Black, w/ small roots, We undecom- Humus 4p0 sed vegetation, saturated, rather oft Sapric Peat in soft sl 11 hter, lose or anlc, w/ depth e i1ttit sandy, very arx to Lacustrin, Dark Gray (CL), very soft to soft de/[h Deposit poor y graded re fine gr, V Glacial sed, tr ch), w/ a few finch, Dark Cray Till, w, (SP), saturated, loose to firm Outwash banded w/ LEAN CLAY, a little sandy, inclusion 9. Dark Gray (CL), saturated, rather soft soft to medium g 84'+ 10 more bands of clay, less of sand, w/ depth 11 LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Cray Glacial 12 (CL), w/ a little gravel Till ,saturated, medium 17 18 21 OAR 1I 1 181797v WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS SAwhEDI caf,NG Gv[iN ON,LIIND'WARa Y 4 HA Y 5 HA Y 6 FA N 1 7 1 FA N I6I FA DRILLING DATA Z9 74' 8/13 IM OR nN DIIrh IOLe+N muc LEVI LAV9 I G,ew.Net __ DB 7 ' None 3.8' 4Ah emsd 3" Hand 6 4" Power F11te I — 5' 1 8' Augers Nubile B-31 D�11 Rig on Dodge Power wagon 5 to 23' 6' 34' C�ced: cto r 0 51' 2. I' Bor'ro CcTo;e"e 24 October 2014 MOLL BONING hM (continued) ►a►ri t .3 In... R ly PROJECT: S1h: 1DOc1' St S Cottrg- r.n,). Kx Knl6' LOG OF BORING NO: 1 DEPTH SURFACE ELEVATION: 98.1 SAM►LE UBiril IN GEOLOGY N WO TYPEFR W FEET DESGRPTION AND CLASSIFICATION IN LEAP CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray CL Glacial N 9 FA v/ tr to a little gravel Till 22�ssturated, medius 3 41 I 42 43 181797vl Fad of Boring - No Refusal hole void backf filed v/ native nee mixed v/ Bentonite on 24 er 2014 Probe lA - Flow - 97.8 0-61' Topsoil Fill, Fill (S1 less than Boring 1). Buried Humus 61'-7', lean Clay, possibly Karl, Gray, saturated, very soft T -8j' Lean Clay, rather silty, Dar) Cray, saturated, very soft u sof' 8j' -10j' Loan Clam v/ band lnclualone Dark Cray, saturated, soft o media Probe put down by power flight nuge: method on 24 October 2014 6 umredr ately backfilled v/ native cuttings mixed v/ Bentonite 1 Patrltk J #love. VZ #161 1000 St t cottage otmn NM 5301A PROJECT:_ NORIM fns seer _— LOG OF BORING NO: �$UNFACf ELEVATION. OEOL00T N OL SC v1Pvwis 4 NO c cASS:FICATON SAMPLE I LAE i OTNEN TESTS n 6� I foil c1tu3cr.. aeily Ori \ \ Otbrr 1 Vivna:-vawol srd/cr ``,cra- of Soil \ \ \� I fate as (1 1 #� tory slr►ods, areredla to the , 'uurear.1 ' j t1.11ied Sail cl... ltleatitm �' S fytea, or to or)•ar $yetas, as \ i LSUlcsrE a appropriate 1) ' :C+ Fautra[fon 'K^ Value - Surber i •n; !a[a 11� Of blow lce to drt_ De^S.t71 #elft-Mrral S pc!j �,I_ ee 11� PUT otoot I L Hoi•rurr II Yater fearir; I Conten• i 7US :c= K No i j • tater 1:• term 6rrbal Larfc`. of #earl• keem.red , Sarplr Sa-.Sa[--•- 1 ln'Icetr. `yPe - .� I 1f� r! Sr. pee: 1 S;8ylit-lar I 16- 1,\' • F/111 t A^ttrtl r --' « . 10 ..It 1:' 74" MILVal l ) Nal[attv[. Yt aSJat'•F tiTf cfa•�VtiL DATA _1. iV. .Its 4/-: 14 • a �rl Y.1. I 1817 M EXI-MIT "C" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT is»v7vi FR7t : INTESTATE GMTEON1CFL 61G FLOC ID. : 653 769 2467 Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc Patrick 1 Hines, PE a16'100 S s Cama° OM.a 49155616 (612)4145770 13 November 2014 lir James Rudoa 14846 Timbcrhil( Road Minnetonka MN 55345 Re: Subsulfiace Soil Investigation Proposed Single Fanuly Residence W of 7061 W 654 St, Chsrhassen, Minn Nov. 13 2014 11: e5w7 P2 This is in response to your contact of recent regarding groundwater on this project. As you know, I investigated the lot last month and issued a report dated 25 October 2014.1 found a total of T & 8'!2' of unsuitable soil at the locations of Hosing I & Probe IA, respectively, in the form oftopsoil fill, general and varying fill, buried original humus and ovrrly soft clay or mart. First suitable bast sod is a loose to firm sand or a soft to medium lean cluy. I recommended removing these materials and placing controlled fill, Soling that you will bout to seriously control groundwater in the protea. Regarding groundwater, I found it very high on this site ar a stabilized level of 1.8'. As I understand it, The City ofChanbassen has asked if this water level will change as a result of site correction. 1 used as a stsbihzed water level the 1.8' found a day after the hand auger phase was completed. I had encountemd water while drilling and did achieve the base granular soil that first day. When I did the power auger phase, water was creeping up to nearly the same level a few home later, so I felt that the 1.8' is valid. I believe that, when you correct this lot, controlling groundwater, and compacting fill, tuost likely granular, the groundwater will soon rebound to its original level. 1.8 as found in mn boring. If you construct ordinary and good site drainage on your finished project, groundwater will not be affected by any artificial recharge the result of your activities. If you have any additional questions on this, or if I can be of assistance in any additional capacity, do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience Sincerely, INTERSTATE GEOTECHN INEERING, Inc sp,cK J. hryf e I tT_ cW U-Uilr, ^,'w'I T!?'S PL -IN, S.PcWi'CATIM 39 . 45. a i •'3 Tit1T 1 AM A Cr_,Y UM-liiC PRO-FSIOW Patrick J Hines, PE i �1 trop President Blast a it"a `Tfic LAWS OF Tif S64TE OF MMT.WTA E cvc.. p ti� ve PIVSC 4ie4eBqua°atm DME I3Rny'(Y NIhr1ESOTAREG NO. kZZIM 181797vl MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT MIN: 1008671-0504161542-5 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., as nominee for the Lender FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB, a federal savings bank, its successors and assigns, which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect Dated this day of 2015. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. i STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2015, by the of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, acting solely as nominee for the Lender Flagstar Bank, FSB, a federal savings bank, on its behalf. NOTARY PUBLIC THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUrsoN Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Clave Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651452-5000 181797vl COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CITY OF CAANHASSEN Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline Date: November 6, 2014 Agency Review Response Deadline: November 13, 2014 Date Application Filed: November 4, 2014 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Sharmeen AI-Jaff 952-227-1134 saljaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Senior Planner Engineer ❑ Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60 -Day Review Period Deadline: Rt 7:00 n.m. November 24, 2014 at 7:00 .m. November 25, 2014 Application: Request for a metes & bounds subdivision of a .69 -acre parcel into two (2) lots on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 2061 West 65th Street (Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, PID 25-5350070). Applicant/Owner: John & Kimberly Core UPDATED PLANS). In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: Federal Agencies: ❑ Attorney ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ® Building Official ❑ US Fish & Wildlife ® Engineer ❑ ® Fire Marshal Watershed Districts: ® ® Forester Park Director ❑ Carver County WMO ® Water Resources ❑ Lower MN River ® Minnehaha Creek Carver County Agencies: ❑ Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek ❑ Community Development ❑ Engineer ❑ Environmental Services ❑ Historical Society ❑ Parks ❑ Soil & Water Conservation District State Agencies: ❑ Board of Water & Soil Resources ❑ Health ❑ Historical Society ❑ Natural Resources -Forestry ❑ Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control ❑ Transportation Utilities: Cable TV — Mediacom Electric — Minnesota Valley Electric — Xcel Energy Magellan Pipeline Natural Gas — Centel Energy Phone — Centuryl-ink Adjacent Cities: ❑ Chaska ❑ Eden Prairie ❑ Jackson Township ❑ Minnetonka ❑ Shorewood ❑ Victoria Adjacent Counties: ❑ Hennepin ❑ Scott School Districts: ❑ Eastern Carver County 112 ❑ Minnetonka 276 Other Agencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority ❑ MN Landscape Arboretum ❑ SouthWest Transit ❑ TC&W Railroad SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2014-30 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, November 24, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for a metes and bounds subdivision of a .69 -acre parcel into two (2) lots on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 2061 West 65°i Street (Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, PID 25-5350070). Applicant/Owner: John & Kimberly Corey. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-30 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner Email: saljaffiaci.chanhassen.mmus Phone: 952-227-1134 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on November 13, 2014) F*w:1:i:l�1J /---------- _ I lrereby aMdy Mal mi, wrvey, oar or rept V.m pprYd by Am .1. my orod su11— aM r.1 l vn o&Iy licorlwd lytl Sum,w orE.'Me—.1 Me Sul. of m -o -u. Dred WOforJB.pmrmn.zW4. y I � ��v» • RPR e. i ■ - e. 9ODN)CC(r9AGE %A -C F-A�c :.. _o orb xs^w v = ,.;•__ � - ___ .c- _, W[ �¢ M ofv-> C,vvAril O `s.0 T O 0 G65 " i--®_�D.A.' WOepSEL 8 0 M A J� A z� -..w .aE ME -- — FEwCE p At sSE —'o—t19Eq Jrn* 0L Ctl, At rvEE ear aALs OcofaoE3wga.No —mLT ¢0EI3IL7N aGT --Eo- CE.p.S —a•u— OVEA.EM vrp�-v e �EY..,D__ LlTA _ -}--r-- Fdwiekn i ! rrEo.nOV — S-dRY Y.EY So. 0 UA .s="oo, -T := 'Ar - i / � ,• N87°31' "W 195.00 %•-� ------ 4 _--,� 11 _ - Lot 3 ------------- OT ` =BLOCK 2 \\ D69L'BPFIOB OP P80Pf.RlY SOM V EYED W 3, Bmuk2MOLDES ADDffION. mAq mthemaltE plw WemLCma Comry Mimml. OpVERALNOTEB 1) Ttie Suvry w, pftrio E vim Ne bmefil of a We so®imeal p Aft! by Sewn Tok Gumvry CoANAI FJe No, PLIC 0343,De2tlMry2I,2014. Wevmemehllo n8"im'ep„ toSche eBofmi,m=m:'. 1)I) Tnw, moNliom,rffiia0m, mdeessmmu.Jmy, worz�in llndn®o�mJ kaxmem fill Oreemhe, 39, t969.r IXe. Na 08383. Thi, ercmed u Iewrctl alo:y Nc ummmly 10 (m o(me subjM proycny, u,bawo he:wu 1¢) Tvm,,<wlhOwc:mdlmm vW mems4J®Y.wmmnrdmF�waYol filM hme 3. 19fl3.e Dx Na 59m1. Thi, Paumme u mored m me nmmeev—ofine eukm Eupmy. u ehowa hmm� IU) DmwBe wd Ublih MAGI w shoves m me lemldM PIAL 2) Mr Adp,s: 2061 W 65m S, Fxalnar, MN 3) P Zme loroeft ifta: T6h proplh m dined a ZAA C (w of ma®,1 DoudiM) p Flood Irmrm Ram MAI, Commuoiry P,uel No.27MI (W5 B, eBxtive dm of1WY 2, 1979. n e,ptl Att,r.rurm,Bw: Theorto lydur i.3o}3al-aqurefM ora 696 H-mr. S) B,N Crm. Haue-1,52WI- pme fa,, Ui>eY,Y 1.83N/ -,gone Rq Grande-16H.,qume Ee4 Omk 25H/- qme (¢t Told -3,683-'-w own lba I) tl,N Covm lYW=l2ptAA 'B SNe Ekr,tlw: EI.-- b on me TW Nm HYd oo loomed m me NonbrY cmoer of me mblm popery WvmB m elvvetim of 1062.1 (NAVD 1988) Plwe oou IM eor;o m shown oftA& of , 30 foot LaHa of IM mblal pmprry was op®ed Gam Mm VR Li)A mappm8. 8) AAA, lvfom,tl A The amav Zoom, (m me subjml pro n w SSE - Saglo Frady Re idmfiel Dift M for me Cl of Cheehemm'fw m,p ft N JAn,la,2014.The,n6,eL hnppt rd nopepm um ftadcom for wd,wi, dmipptiov ere uliwd (raft Soc. 2"15. Lw mquirvmmb em NOftA a of me Z iog ONamtt (aura an mea web tl¢ m me doe of Augurt 25. 2014 AmI ertw bBum: fib,,ft, remeSeNwb- Frau: W fid, Side: 10&q, Roft, M be, Aecmory Snvtturt.bbrb-FrouL 30k Side: 10(eeL Rm: 10 fiel W Repwmub- La Nu 15,00D, Fmr ge W. DAP& 135 Hmd Coreg -30 P. P1ux ouw mw me eeoau m,bduom ft ft *I. P^ Aft, mee bem mmded lmuugb arihW®we mum be -aKh.mmdmma J6Yy Ram m.,wmaeaaP.lmmpa,;aeam� wer��emr. aamg lmmbe obn®1 from me Zoom6 AdminiAmW; for me corral rrNetiom (m mu OIL 91 LOBa W 1u- cha melrcuu®ofwL eb 6t4 ( ebi4h brdwobwvedevidma mgemee wim evideva from ,ft fl g urcm: Plum rftm fioft mmh eomFina, Phr provdod by eBm,, rayl g, by u[Itily oftorforo, ,ad oma P" a -w Meurd Ouu iormmetiwl MeloP + rme uoMpmmduuLm rmmiu uirc. Howevu,lwlg N en la oof lmdnpamd frmr !e nwlelr. corrmkmty mdrtLeblr dePmL Whe,e edAllaoY or dnailM rmleoa rtmdregmectim-eAifW m. m.r beuwlmY Aho. Flrr edemuemwrl .amo mh:bn m;Elym Ymuy ub,ay. Wl m<uow m,mm wme amiw,papalr-A caphmslm oQubw submivN fmmis vovry. P.we rtfvme Ticka Na ,405]0119 fm,IiaafwNyap,m,mmu era ro `\ ` `\ \ \�\ •ova ` \ _ / �S8Z29'21"E 195.00 ---- \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ G ITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED NOV n 4 2014 CHANHAM PLANNING DEPT H. �Sl m 10 0 10 20 0 9GlENFEET USE SURVEYLEGEND I lrereby aMdy Mal mi, wrvey, oar or rept V.m pprYd by Am .1. my orod su11— aM r.1 l vn o&Iy licorlwd lytl Sum,w orE.'Me—.1 Me Sul. of m -o -u. Dred WOforJB.pmrmn.zW4. y O C(S XJ. vpWEN> � ��v» • RPR e. i ■ - e. 9ODN)CC(r9AGE %A -C F-A�c :.. _o orb xs^w v = ,.;•__ � - ___ .c- _, W[ �¢ M ofv-> C,vvAril O `s.0 T O 0 G65 " i--®_�D.A.' WOepSEL 8 0 M A J� A z� -..w .aE ME -- — FEwCE p At sSE —'o—t19Eq H. �Sl m 10 0 10 20 0 9GlENFEET USE SURVEYLEGEND I lrereby aMdy Mal mi, wrvey, oar or rept V.m pprYd by Am .1. my orod su11— aM r.1 l vn o&Iy licorlwd lytl Sum,w orE.'Me—.1 Me Sul. of m -o -u. Dred WOforJB.pmrmn.zW4. y O C(S XJ. vpWEN> Vev.rrv-m,efa-acv..w fMVERGOUNTY Existing Conditions Survey For 2061 West 65th Street ■ DINMM DY 9ODN)CC(r9AGE %A -C F-A�c :.. _o orb xs^w v = ,.;•__ � - ___ .c- _, W[ RL8 L ofv-> C,vvAril O `s.0 TMR_ �M_ {,.'"EIF6,N0 »v9gA\r 0 G65 " i--®_�D.A.' WOepSEL o wRVEY Y%aYENl 10 "E 0 — Deux n:( • SURVEY YbmmExl �aT Ms D oAl -----cwgb — — ELEC-9iC uboExRawb p s.RYE. mNevm PcnT -..w .aE ME -- — FEwCE p At sSE —'o—t19Eq Jrn* 0L Ctl, At rvEE ear aALs OcofaoE3wga.No —mLT ¢0EI3IL7N aGT --Eo- CE.p.S —a•u— OVEA.EM vrp�-v e �EY..,D__ LlTA ,.IYENN.1ftA rrEo.nOV tv -s'[ SM, S-dRY Y.EY e S•AY .R.. := 'Ar - SCANNED USE(INCLUDINGCDRYING, OISTRIBUDON, ANO/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION, OF TRIS PRODUCT IB ST TLY PRp1IBfIED WHNOUT SATHRE-BERGOUIST,INC.SFJWWWRITTENAUTHOR TION. USEWITHOIR SND AUTHORV TION CONSTfIU1ES AN ILIEGRIM TE USE AND SNAIL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SPTHRE-BERGOIIIST, INC. OF AL REBPONSIBBfTY. SAI-BERGWIST,INC. RESERVES THE RMxtTOH0.0ANY ILLEGRIIAATE DBERON PARTY LEG.ILY RESP«+BIBLE FM DAAMGES GR LOBBES REB1aTMG FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I lrereby aMdy Mal mi, wrvey, oar or rept V.m pprYd by Am .1. my orod su11— aM r.1 l vn o&Iy licorlwd lytl Sum,w orE.'Me—.1 Me Sul. of m -o -u. Dred WOforJB.pmrmn.zW4. y 6vW ALY ` I SATHRE—BERGQUIST, INC. ... a 1lONIIIN BROAD3mY MMrtATA IPL 5OI11d41826800D • •NFPyy jeH Vev.rrv-m,efa-acv..w fMVERGOUNTY Existing Conditions Survey For 2061 West 65th Street ..v...... 'Z'�901 DINMM DY 9ODN)CC(r9AGE %A -C 1 1 Ids Chanhassen MINNESOTA OECI®BY RL8 W„E AM Fierrm IJArm W. MSBS ,Mya.m.e.p. sou SCANNED NOV it 4 2014 I p6CRRElON fN lROPRRI]'SDRVRYeD _ - __ - _ I e&� a reyra La13. Ill MOLMESAOOITgN.aam,Jwl Wersmhd PI. Illel Cuvv COAI M®uaLL iM57Oa11co,,L aqy PROPOSED MOPERTY UMCRITTIONS \ \ RIs Pafell L � TEe wd Yl.S11 fxs Mld 1, Bleck; ]MILC1k9 ADURION.eLmtlmg m rhe samdedPW ihemG Grvre Cowry Mi®oom wgnhv wiW _ \ 7v ' euemmv fmdrswgemd�tiluy WPumwv wdemEramttr naMalY 10 W 1000 fxC Me ann1Y 500 fe4 avdrbe E =o wuwly 5 CO fm rhvmf. s -AR' ® er.. vAl 0 SAX.lART C.EaM1OIi i ni i T sur ThVPan of Lola Blmk`. NOLM5)IDDC]l ilecceel . eb, OlOOl l I]lell C- COAOOY Wheleell which Liu essr of Ne wen _ �- - \\ •,• wLry 10 o 9150 feeLm uberwN®semau for mtl POTuu acvwdvcdv®Ae vodEalY AO rs4 Ne smaMYl OO feet tM _ _ � —1 — .•- MMYS G08frei avd ibe wubr1Y500 fm WemL TWS OEC Gs -- IT,- © Tf.£w.m.E Alv ] •GAcrs m Tp. Ea l Pe., a— Ill -- —ra— H TNs Survey wu pxfmmed viW We lsfit of a 011e mmmmrnr preryN Ey SmwM TiOe Camey Caml®Y File Na. PL140]oJi3, DOW /---- - Myr,2014. we mvlhefollawiv8 aim mpwd+mxnedmeeor5ic camvivomt HI) Taw.caoAOm.runicOom and eumev4 if evY. cwwocd iv GnMpamW Fm®m161W [k®M M.1%I.uDac. A, 083BJ. Thu mimmulocmtlaboB Ae m�Av1Y 10 fxl ofrhe sublet l^oPe ,w shorn Maur --_-�vJ-L''] °�"'w i_�IJZ/V_KYYa _ -PiY)_Y�} -------_-_-_ 1)11 ivmv, aoaAuoos. rwmLdm mtlm®mq Javy.cwmmal ivF awrfilWJ®I.IS•3,m Dx Na 59801. Thu£ Tis laca� / - --_—_ --- ___ mete ooMw®cameo(Ihe wbjaS P^LaatY.usba.v hereto. z Olt- __ _ _- 7 �•--'��I -. _ - �_._ _ ;� ___ _- - % /... _ _ IP) OnhuBemE Wilihm®muushowwWe rsmNd Plm. �SLrvrywu Prfmmed wiWoW Me hevefic ofa00e mmnublmLTMamayleeavammb mvmbuv6lhe wOlat praperry of which we — N8r31'14•W 195.00 - - - - _- - - - - - - - - - - � IITw - - _ 21 SW A•4es 2081W851h8t hPhM,ND1 __: 9L50 __ e D EydT I.rmvalls: Thu paprlyumurimdv(meC(my Of �IRooteSjpv F'ka0lesmmz Rtle Mq. ('a®My Aug No. 0 ---.1--'----_- s - � � � TIWSIOWS B. eRauve McoflulY 219'4. _a ,� ______ -_' "-. .- Qt -----___T n GlrhgPwlAr.. �'rJ" 5 5 S 4)1) P.rael A.ul far..u..: th Om.lmdwuJO,lza/-gmaFesw0.e90.c.oa A A (yam vu. xXl I h 1 1 �� Rlu^^ N�f^2Obk .121 BarC Cmu: Have -1320H- fay OrivewY l.BJJH-quve6;CmeM-]E/- I A/I I I I A/ H- a3.l 3,OSJaI. your feet l l _ L _ l I 11 V L - / O3) HW Cevm Ratlp�l3 pmad rl ______-nm_-...._._.__T - I a _________ ____ -91.50 ___________i r rmPa.aarwlAre.l.krvatla. _ i �� I \\ 5)1) Puad 1 Aea 15.165 I F_ S)1)1) Hoed Cava: Nae / Parcel l i Paroel2! S)IR) HWC—Rab-P a I I P �1-,519 5)2111 IhrdUw:Hmee-1}NHr-squme kK Oriwwy1.8J3./-wave GeLC®ee-]64-egme RS Duk 25N/-gme(ctiaY- �� __ n I - _ - - \ I I - � ..... 3,093 -/-,yam em I � _, Ta I h - O3j2) HW Caar Rtlla-2<Pacwe 3 I � � -,, I � I vi 1 1-...a.e f a - 1 - 81 ya 84vatla: Ekvuime ov NO HY Weellesu laemaaf the waled POPOTYl evel 1001.1 1 pJ 1 �___ W v Illm AROof (t.'AVD19881. PIa vGeOW mnmwa chow wmdeofsl0(cor bulla o(rhe auh3al propafy weobvioed fiamMVONR LiDARmelryuy. IWOme el 2 11,O n ry I I — y ]I ZOIll rEarmaOa: The norm ImvSfm Ae sul pTONeOY u MY-Sw&FemilY Ruid®al Duvw9 Pa We Crry of Cleedel s eo®S - - _I - V{ I N i0 mP loud lmmY 14. 2010 The Ol hel{M1s. ®d Ram R}a se NOTOW fm sad All d® wet a2®ed fi Ser. 2MM I I I La requbmmb mdaeNab ofmelum90ntimefaustlm Weu wd Weadedm ofwulPu 25, 2014 mdmeuraROws: N \I z _Svrart.ShcmL-FmCw ua.siae 10 feel RAI 5 I I I I Real 10f., A_uo }.Sn_we.bhvis.Frtm 30 Ra. Side: 10 fro, Real (M I 1 Ia Rewiremerm-La As¢ 15,000; Fr�gc 90; Del 135 P I 4 Rmd Co 30Fnecel I - 1 - Plmsenom NU NeSmvY mvictimforlhe subjeRpopaly mry NvehmemmdM WmugErairy poaae wecwm be uvmmaf loch I I I ...._ ®aaamaab ifmrf maw iaa Paatrd mLlmm Po:deam�a wersmmad dmemvmg keahe oM.mal ham.he zaamE Admioisbmm 1 I I -.. h 2 r waa,artm am;.dm ret mh.na. -BLOCK I SI_�-:Rm®f daFyaW 110XY Fnawnnv s_'\ I-.. lOvwoofwlidams �e weiden-e mgMawideviMla fim We ellWe 91 Ld011eple-Oe ` _______ 'j a` eras I Ml mwcu. lem oOuivW fivmu Im EN bycOmLSAukmpby UNi And oNa N'ehave Tem Mhded Of hmI&11)OdOf P OlilY w�waoics.P Pori rywm�amwdaq L _______ I5 Wu wfmmlIa eve,Waview ofed mtlapasmd Wssia H0—lrkmg We oualocatiw of _ - n 1 _J Y f®bmcammbe anvuelY,L�le¢IY mdrelublY dwic-N. Where MAOooelmmm dnailM mfameliwuPquir4tlm climry Wisal fel OAL Wlem _ a - Jur eawvedon meY h va'eawy. Also. Plmse vote char seuorel cauliOm msY iohibir avebililY m vinblY obsa'e W the w�00n lasrd oo sM _ 9], - rabjett Pnyeny.AGopM Smel)ne Call ww rubminMfm Otis sun ry. Plusa rttamce Ticker No. IJ05]Of59 fine4tl of utility operolmw se7429'21'e 195.00 - _... -- -. ,— 6F CHANNASS& RECEIVED NOV it 4 2014 1 a 4I Y -I-.-Y .l9n ■ B e&� a reyra 1 C 1 iM57Oa11co,,L aqy R my 1 T V W. RIs O ILY Ill SE L \'aa w- �� 4 saYT creno. Pox. 7v ' A E =o e..w�l mss• s.0 NOV it 4 2014 SURVEYLEGEND A A/C %- G"ST v6 NOmEX] CANHASSENPLANNINGDEPi -I-.-Y .l9n ■ B sat., ra-uue-s+-ara..Va GVtVFR COUNTY d aE Eno sEc+lav iM57Oa11co,,L J4 Tt KVE Cuda my 1 T V W. RIs O ILY Ill SE OIR31®BY • s.mh vmWEv-coeur 4 saYT creno. Pox. _ o_L O GAS v. =o e..w�l mss• s.0 s -AR' ® er.. vAl 0 SAX.lART C.EaM1OIi A 10 0 10 ID 40 T sur - rze eF61X0 e.EVAnON SG4ENFffT ® 5-GRV JRYY ♦ .yE<GOY-sous — .•- CAs _. _11o11 TWS OEC Gs SURVEYLEGEND A A/C %- USE ONCLUDINC COPYING. DISTRIBUTION. ANOgR CONVEYANCE OF INFORANTKKI)OF TRIS MOWOT IS STIUCRrI'RONreIIFD WIi1KKlf SNT"IE.BERC'°DIST'INC'sF RESSWRITTENAIfnlORI2AT USEWI"1IXff suowrlroHvwnoN corvsnnnEs Ary R1eGInhwTE usE AND sora rHFHBBr IfR1EMIAFYS4TNRE-BERGIXIIST.INC .DEAlLRE5PON51BItffY. ANY RLEGRIIMTE MTHUSER E-BERGWIST. INC. RESERVEBTHE FOR USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPg1SIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULnNG Fl ILLECITISMTE USE. IlwepYaSIPPIMPiv.aP. pYnagvrw Pepmd Gy mea ukanp'JlatlnASlbsmld PlRlsna WSllmaW lstl 3uYe r order n. kewarMareelrammr. DeYdtlb a1SepYrM.]IH.. K _ sat., ra-uue-s+-ara..Va GVtVFR COUNTY iM57Oa11co,,L DRAWRRY Cuda RIs `wYc'- OIR31®BY - W 15090121HBBMDEIAYYM1ZkTAMN.SV%ISSY)5]B9pJB e�Enx vLF e O u5 -a _ iQ OSJ O GAS v. - 0 s L R %G ♦ .yE<GOY-sous — .•- CAs _. _11o11 TWS OEC Gs -- IT,- © Tf.£w.m.E Alv ] •GAcrs m Tp. Ea l Pe., a— Ill r- LRYTG 9CIAL —ra— av SENE9 0. USE ONCLUDINC COPYING. DISTRIBUTION. ANOgR CONVEYANCE OF INFORANTKKI)OF TRIS MOWOT IS STIUCRrI'RONreIIFD WIi1KKlf SNT"IE.BERC'°DIST'INC'sF RESSWRITTENAIfnlORI2AT USEWI"1IXff suowrlroHvwnoN corvsnnnEs Ary R1eGInhwTE usE AND sora rHFHBBr IfR1EMIAFYS4TNRE-BERGIXIIST.INC .DEAlLRE5PON51BItffY. ANY RLEGRIIMTE MTHUSER E-BERGWIST. INC. RESERVEBTHE FOR USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPg1SIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULnNG Fl ILLECITISMTE USE. IlwepYaSIPPIMPiv.aP. pYnagvrw Pepmd Gy mea ukanp'JlatlnASlbsmld PlRlsna WSllmaW lstl 3uYe r order n. kewarMareelrammr. DeYdtlb a1SepYrM.]IH.. e^e sV4s.E ' ' SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. am sat., ra-uue-s+-ara..Va GVtVFR COUNTY Lot Split Exhibit For �f C.1 2061 West 55th Street •-"'^'. '�bO01 DRAWRRY B°DII„PA`[E'°°` RIs Chanhassen MINNESOTA OIR31®BY - W 15090121HBBMDEIAYYM1ZkTAMN.SV%ISSY)5]B9pJB e�Enx vLF e MIX RAYL YTmm�� 1FMsad Malt Ma. MSE3 m'(1lal urn bb14 SCANNED 4 i GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN --_�� West s coREogirl� _65th Street_ INV:1066.0"d�Ij" _ _.D�- K' t R%Ef.(OVE I .I _ e 1 v INV'1056'.8 a - - - - O \ 1060 p /6+'6.71 _f'3 nIN�: 10 .8C44 I_ v i 9. X 1i y{ _ L ATG-: iO�Z �°I \ -_ - - - _10% t I 9 - - I T IN 7 [y °9° F da Plastic CBI- -' TC 1059.2 0s9_ BLDG PAn 7 — All Parcel 2 INV : 10571 I 77.GX6V -, 1059 T GRIND WTR: l i' GF 1062.7 - _i 5✓''� ±1058.a �= TF 1063.0 ! i. 71 BF 1 = IBF 1061.5 ( e 1060 Jli r 1 (1.5' CRAWL SPACE) .0 / \ •.°t- II Plastic 082 ek \ TC: 10604 I,;-� REMOVE I \\ INV: 1057 7r•'YJ (108t„tTj � _� I I SEPTIC I I L.4. �0. I ( 'SYSTEM I \ 1 l l F - '� I I _ f� d• ♦, �_� t•�`�' ?.,cam' , Tr_ 060.4 A I -Isa- PlasticCB3 r�-- \<2. 198.4 D T -/I-� V� '- TC: 1960.0 r_ ;y 37'' .p ^ D 1. C 1111 2 \ r-� 'INV 105$.0 `. Q .a 'Q I'A\ Irk \P ;4..Rn •ya, �__�__% -��---'ni1 �...• -._ EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS: MN TOLL FREE (800252-1166 TWIN CITIES (651( 454-0002 r CONSTRUCTION NOTES INSTAL SET FENCE, Cu,,WAT TREE P, OR A43 TgC FENCING E GRACING LILHTS AS REQUIRED BYTHE Y, WATERSFIED, OR A43 DIRECTED 81 THE ENGWEER INSTALL ROCK ENTRANCE BEIM REMOVENECESSARYTREESANDSEP!CSYSTEM VERIFY SEWER SEWICE INVERTS MIOR TO GCNSTRULIMN DUE TO EUSTIND TOPO MY. 10% GRADES ARE PPoDNSED TO MAINTAIN DRAW GE WATER SEANCE SHALL BE I- COPPER IWTH CURB BOX TAPPED INTO E)MTNG NXI RENOVE MLY NECESSARY STREET TO INSTAU_ SANITARY SEWER SERVICEAMD RESTORE STREET TO HATCH EXISTING STREET SECTION, INSTALLS aETOCONNECTSANRMYSEWERMWCETOMAH. THESEWER SERNOESWLLLBECSMMATAWNNUTAOF 0% MUPTOTHEPT.P' ERIYLINE PLUMNG COOS MOST BE FOLLOWED VMEN SEWER SERVICE IS EXTENDEDFRCM T�- PROPERTY UNE TO ME HOUSE clry oETAL PUTEs SINAL tavERN N 20 10 0 10 20 b BCALEINFEET SYMBOLLEGEND US£IN0.UDNG COPYING 06TRBIRKHI.ANDAJR COM/EYANCEOF IIFpiWTR]NI CFTMB PRaDUCrssTFlK:nv RlpleRED NTTHCU! SATM3EN3ERGOUIST, IMM EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHO ATON, UBE WT11101JT SAIDAUTHORIZATIOfi BTITU}ESANIMEGMWTE115EAND SIVIITHEREBY IMB,IMFY BATHRE41ERGMJIST. INC, OF ALL RESPoNSBIIIY. SATHREA1ERGW6T.INC. REBERVEBTHEPoGHTTOH0.DANYLLEGRAMIE USER OR PARTY LEGNLY RESFONBBLE FOR DAAUGES OR LOSSES REBLLTNG FROMLIfGITIMTEVSE LOT UNE - - -•••••----••-. - GRADING EROSION CONTROL PLAN CHANHASSEN. 2061 WEST 65TH STREET MINNESOTA JAMES BRUDOS BULDNG SETBACK BDIIM1VtY DRAM BY @ NRH 1M1M REVISE PERSUBSOL NVEBTI(NATIQI 'I 2 PARCEL B'JUIMRYLIE ��. RW DRAINAGEANO UTLffY FASB.ENTS NNMnRHenrea PE_ Oae: o L'oTb. 479x7- DML,/ RI wN _VARY EX STORM SEWER PPE - — STORM SEWER PIPE EJt 5'!pW STINGTIIIIE i '. a., STOIW STRUCTURE � STORK SIRUCTURELABEL 0 EXSANRARYSEWFRPPE SANITARY SEWER PIPE EX SANRARYSEWER MAMNOIf �; SNNRARVSEVERMANHCtE m EXWMTERMIN WA ERWN HYDRANT BATE VALVE EIERGENCY OVERFLOW SWINE PRECONSTRUGIIDN SILT FENCE POSTCONSTRIIOTTONSLTfEME WOOOFBFA BI.aMIST DrtcHCIEa(s �.-/ LMUTYPOLE �Qa DEVTLOPFA � SAMFS Mtl,S 2061 Wen MN 5531 Con a.ea INS SST IT C'omad:lamn Bmdm Td'612.8504W9 Em jmMd°mn9mYlaJP+Lmm ENOINT ER'LA\U SM%1:YOK SATHRE-BER(KILIST. fNC W, .MN55391 Eng.— Nae 15XPPn IaW &imry Ron SYnW m Td, 952476NiN0 Fa. %2- 7"HA Fat vMwgaaah¢me \ ryu Nemm CITYOFCHANHASSU zaRmR:RSIF RECEIVED PK.,4p,/ 5m'n"re S ft k, - Fmm: 30 feet, Side: lO fi.L Rees 30 fs% An' i, Snernre Se/dvah -Fm E 30 fee(, Side: 10 feel Rc .. 10 fen "R,.r.ft - Ld 4rea: 15,000; Fmnuge: 90; Degh: 1'_S NOV n 4 2014 Hnrd Ce,w TO P.t CHANHAMNPIANNINGDEPT It PRELIMINARY" -••• BASEW W RRN TML4 REVBE tlUDNG,ADD ORIINRE US£IN0.UDNG COPYING 06TRBIRKHI.ANDAJR COM/EYANCEOF IIFpiWTR]NI CFTMB PRaDUCrssTFlK:nv RlpleRED NTTHCU! SATM3EN3ERGOUIST, IMM EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHO ATON, UBE WT11101JT SAIDAUTHORIZATIOfi BTITU}ESANIMEGMWTE115EAND SIVIITHEREBY IMB,IMFY BATHRE41ERGMJIST. INC, OF ALL RESPoNSBIIIY. SATHREA1ERGW6T.INC. REBERVEBTHEPoGHTTOH0.DANYLLEGRAMIE USER OR PARTY LEGNLY RESFONBBLE FOR DAAUGES OR LOSSES REBLLTNG FROMLIfGITIMTEVSE inueer, Ke T iina nia. un ve..vti.iwm nru PREPAREDWIE OR UNDER MY DIRECT BWERV1sON ANDTIMTI At A DULY REGISTERED PRCFESBIONAL ENGNEER UMX:R THE umoO,THEBTATEOF.NNNEBOTA //(//�q /'/L•�/VaL// �..°a a9q T SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. ,SB sgIM BROADWAY WAYIATA W.595BI IB521116WN W N` .°"`^a ^` -•••••----••-. - GRADING EROSION CONTROL PLAN CHANHASSEN. 2061 WEST 65TH STREET MINNESOTA JAMES BRUDOS . . 4zaamt DRAM BY @ NRH 1M1M REVISE PERSUBSOL NVEBTI(NATIQI 'I 2 NPo, ��. RW DATE NNMnRHenrea PE_ Oae: o L'oTb. 479x7- DML,/ SCANNED UTILITY PLAN , EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANYAND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GORIER STATE ONE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS: MN TOLL FREE IBM 252-1186 TWIN CITIES (6551) 454MM CONSTRUC OIO NNCONSTRUCT�TES ` INSTALL SILT FENCE ANCI TREE PRESERVATION FENCING AT GRADING LIMITS, M REQUIRED BYTHE CT'. WATERSHED. GRAS XRECTED BY THE ENGFEER INSTALL ROCK ENTRANLEBEIM VERIFY SEWER SEWICE INVERTS MIOR TO CONFIRUCTION DUE TO EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY. 1.0% GRADES ARE PROPOSED TO MWNN DRAINAGE WATER SERVICE 51NLL BE 1-COPMR`MTH CURS BOX TAPPED IMO EXISTING MAN R13NI ONLY NECESSARY STREET TO IHBTALL SMITHY SEWER SERNCE Alp RESTORE STREET TO MATCH EXISTING STREET SEDPOI INSTALLS E TO CONNECT SNIRARY SEWER SERVICE TO MAIN, THE SEINER SERVICESINLLBEe SMMATAMNNWOFMOG MUPTOTIEPFCPERTY PLUI,BNGMMMUSTMFMLOWEDVMENSEWERSERN iSExT WMFRCM TIE PROPERTY UNE TO THE HOUSE, CITY DETAIL PLATES SMALL GOVERN i xes DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVEIONS wYr r� +Ea> >ap i SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. '-' + a 1505d11NB0.0ADYMY WAYUTAW.SSlB1 �.M9000 *e PAF BUILDNG SETBACK BCUNOMY UTILITY PLAN 2061 WEST 65TH STREET JAMES BRUDOS IBtlPEiI@PI� PARMLBOUNDA UNE — i11ETi 0iSM170 OHMAGE AHD URT• FJ�SFA,FNTS �/2 West 65th Street ,w �rw�aF rw ael: w�ro row -"' ;6' COREDRILL '« _ '--'- Ni INV:1056.0 STORM SEWER PIPE -I EK soRM srH3c,uE sA ffrt SEWER S WCE CONNECTION DETft STONI STRUCTURE - f7.Nw FFr. �11p119.Wr� BOX Lti'[• NtYrw O ice^\ COWL Ex SANITARY SEYIER PPE 6' D. 7�5 m °F UritfNLI�1Y a INV: 1056.8 6��6 "`` b '.- _ RR1>Amce.1I t �Lf _---- ~'Ns 1060 zI /aD.TILE o"i YI11112014 1056.3 uOiFMYiePMc �� SANPARY09BT11 AINV: 1 - a--------�o�PTAi1`Y, II,, 1 Plastic 04 � sEv.FnsFxvla X TC: 1056,7 1059 I i I X11156. _. �Lo _.\ HYDRANT Plastic CB1 I— _ _ I 0 • _ I m� TC: 1059.21059 2Xf BLDG PAD Cel -t - -� 11w i s Parcel l - EMERGENCYOVERFLOW SI%ALE INV 10572 I 77,5'AW -� If: I L I' PRE C W STRUCTpN 9LT FENfE 1059 GF 1062.7 PDST CONBTRUC,ICN SILTFEIYE GRIND WTR: �' o; TF 1063.0 - wmDFF3ERauMET i1058.4 .. to a Drd CHECKS v BF 1061.5 INS jai 106o (1.5' CRAWL SPACE) 1 Plastic C62 .0 l "- TC 1060.2 ---- 1 '»•"a:. 11 INV: 1057.7 1 (1 --_i C--__—__ 1�5 $---jTK' PYastic CB5� I 70'1860 4 - a? j _ - __� .. - -/'---2.-%-> -�-_oPlast TC:icC 7-t INV: 1058.0mr- 5 _�p,pppyy bonvp aW m s --- - .aC caam •mran 07 4 _- BNeoaa — , EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANYAND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GORIER STATE ONE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS: MN TOLL FREE IBM 252-1186 TWIN CITIES (6551) 454MM CONSTRUC OIO NNCONSTRUCT�TES ` INSTALL SILT FENCE ANCI TREE PRESERVATION FENCING AT GRADING LIMITS, M REQUIRED BYTHE CT'. WATERSHED. GRAS XRECTED BY THE ENGFEER INSTALL ROCK ENTRANLEBEIM VERIFY SEWER SEWICE INVERTS MIOR TO CONFIRUCTION DUE TO EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY. 1.0% GRADES ARE PROPOSED TO MWNN DRAINAGE WATER SERVICE 51NLL BE 1-COPMR`MTH CURS BOX TAPPED IMO EXISTING MAN R13NI ONLY NECESSARY STREET TO IHBTALL SMITHY SEWER SERNCE Alp RESTORE STREET TO MATCH EXISTING STREET SEDPOI INSTALLS E TO CONNECT SNIRARY SEWER SERVICE TO MAIN, THE SEINER SERVICESINLLBEe SMMATAMNNWOFMOG MUPTOTIEPFCPERTY PLUI,BNGMMMUSTMFMLOWEDVMENSEWERSERN iSExT WMFRCM TIE PROPERTY UNE TO THE HOUSE, CITY DETAIL PLATES SMALL GOVERN i xes DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVEIONS wYr r� +Ea> >ap i SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. '-' + a 1505d11NB0.0ADYMY WAYUTAW.SSlB1 �.M9000 *e PAF BUILDNG SETBACK BCUNOMY UTILITY PLAN 2061 WEST 65TH STREET JAMES BRUDOS 61666 PARMLBOUNDA UNE — ORAWNn Q IBM HIIII REV6EPERSUMOLNN£STgATKIN OHMAGE AHD URT• FJ�SFA,FNTS �/2 NRH ,w �rw�aF rw ael: w�ro row RSM 9 IXSTORM SEWER PIPE Ni � ��k�� STORM SEWER PIPE 111• EK soRM srH3c,uE sA ffrt SEWER S WCE CONNECTION DETft STONI STRUCTURE f7.Nw FFr. �11p119.Wr� BOX Lti'[• NtYrw O Ex SANITARY SEYIER PPE BANK RY SEWER %PE �� V�4AlER � �f TYNV'LSwrARr St}(YN£ � sEv.FnsFxvla 5541m1i eOWRIYT "" +aos N 20 10 D 10 20 W SbLE IN FEET SYMBOL LEGEND DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVEIONS LOT tNE IHQi®YCERTiv TNATTNIS RAN ON SPELBKATgN WAS PREPARED BY LIE OR UIpER AIY DPECTSUPERVISION ANO TMTI ANA DATREG6TEREDRICFESSMJNKENGNEERUNOEATIE LAWsi>IE STATEGF_41MFSDTA // /1N�Yr//_- +Ea> >ap i SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. '-' + a 1505d11NB0.0ADYMY WAYUTAW.SSlB1 �.M9000 *e PAF BUILDNG SETBACK BCUNOMY UTILITY PLAN 2061 WEST 65TH STREET JAMES BRUDOS FLEND. 41 z PARMLBOUNDA UNE — ORAWNn Q IBM HIIII REV6EPERSUMOLNN£STgATKIN OHMAGE AHD URT• FJ�SFA,FNTS �/2 NRH RIGHT-OF-WAY RSM ANTE IXSTORM SEWER PIPE STORM SEWER PIPE EK soRM srH3c,uE Ti STONI STRUCTURE STORM STRUCTURE LIBEL O Ex SANITARY SEYIER PPE BANK RY SEWER %PE EX SANRARY SEN£R IMNIOLEe SANRMYSENERIMNHDIE Ex WATERMAN WATERMAN HYDRANT GATE VALVE EMERGENCYOVERFLOW SI%ALE PRE C W STRUCTpN 9LT FENfE PDST CONBTRUC,ICN SILTFEIYE ------- wmDFF3ERauMET Drd CHECKS v cin 0KHANHASSEP! RECEIVED NOV 0 4 2014 -: ANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT DE\'ELOPER \ I.AMEs BRLIDGS 2IN] W.650 Swn CTaeAwxa MN 55317 C.. Linn Budin Td 612,8504%9 EnmJ:lmbudamn@®YkF�il.mm S.ATNRE-BERGQUIST,L .. 150s. Bra%rAv, wayma. MN 55391 E,.L , N. Nl LNImrveya: Ray Syw in Td: 951476 FM:95247"IN Emil oheSRMatsNNle® Z9DIRR: RSF Principal So-urnr a Setbarb - Fant 30 fret. Side: 10 fart, Rea 30 feet 1,e .... n Strarnne Setbucb - Fmt 30 fen, Side: 10 faro Rewe 10 fart Ln Reaidreawnrs La Ate¢ 15.000; FSRnmgc: 9U DryB: I YS Ho.,l Garr - 30 Percalt "PRELIMINARY" DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVEIONS USE INCLUDING COPYNO OBTRBUTION. ANDORCOHVEYANCE a IWORIATNXII OF THE MOOMT B STRICTLY PRDIEBED WITH013i SATHtE-0EIGD16T.ING.'sIXREBSNRRTENAUR10R6ATg1L MEwRHDR SVD AUiI1CRMATpN COHSTIT1fTES N1ILLEGRWTE USE AND SIWITIERFBV .11081 1IFY SATHRE9ERGW6T. INC. OF AU-REBP016BLDY. UTHRE-BER LSTJOIC ESP�OI�b'B EFtADMN(iESpp LOSSES irt9G MER OR FROM LLEGITNMTE USEOFDae IHQi®YCERTiv TNATTNIS RAN ON SPELBKATgN WAS PREPARED BY LIE OR UIpER AIY DPECTSUPERVISION ANO TMTI ANA DATREG6TEREDRICFESSMJNKENGNEERUNOEATIE LAWsi>IE STATEGF_41MFSDTA // /1N�Yr//_- +Ea> >ap i SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. '-' + a 1505d11NB0.0ADYMY WAYUTAW.SSlB1 �.M9000 *e PAF "'IIKLECTNO UTILITY PLAN 2061 WEST 65TH STREET JAMES BRUDOS FLEND. 41 z BASE wML.. 01 raLl OWNH NEVBE GRADING, ADD DRArTIaE — ORAWNn Q IBM HIIII REV6EPERSUMOLNN£STgATKIN FCHANHASSEN, NNESOTA �/2 NRH CIEIXmBY RSM ANTE o LnN9. 4�9rz SCANNtU SUBSURFACE GEOTECIINICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE W of 2061 W 65th St, Chanhassen, Minnesota CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED NOV 0 4 2014 CHANHAMPUNNINGDEPT Prepared by: Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc 8167 100`s Street S Cottage Grove MN 55016 25 October 2014 SCANNED Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc Patrick J Hines, PE 8167 I0& St S ' Cottage Grove MN 55016 (612)414-5770 REPORT OF SUBSURFACE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ' West of 2061 W 650' St, Chanhassen, Minnesota ' 25 October 2014 ' SCOPE OF SERVICES Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, hereafter referred to as "IGE", was retained ' by James Rudos, hereafter referred to as the "Client", to perform a subsurface soil investigation on a parcel of land located as noted in the above title block. The purpose of this investigation is, as this is a "lot split", to identify and evaluate soil and water properties ' associated with the site with respect to constructing a single family residence thereon. One primary soil boring was performed hand and power flight auger methods to a depth of 23' within the project area. In addition, laboratory tests were run upon selected soil ' samples, and a shallower probe was put down to further delineate depth and extent of unsuitable soil. From the resulting data, conclusions are drawn regarding site suitability for the proposed use and recommendations are developed, based upon information gathered to date within the presently authorized scope of services, for site correction procedures and foundation and slab design. SITE OBSERVATIONS The general area is suburban residential in nature, moderate in elevation. Vicinity structures vary in age and design, but are generally newer, in good condition. What is noted, however, is that depths of installation seem to be rather shallow. This site is rather level in terrain pattern, flat from street grade. There is an abandoned wastewater treatment mound on the site. The site is covered mainly by short maintained grasses, with trees and brush, mostly to the rear, and landscaping plants at various locations. Proposed construction on the site is a single family residence. It most likely will be of slab -on -grade or crawl space design configuration with attached garage. Location was not known, but most likely it will be at setbacks similar to those in the vicinity, possibly slightly more to the front. Given site grade versus street level, the site will be built up 1'-2' in any event for positive drainage. It is assumed that the residence will be of usual wood frame design with most building loads transferred to exterior and interior strip footings at frost protection depth (3.5' or greater below finished grade). This type of structure imparts relatively light loads onto foundation soil. BORING LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS The boring and probe locations were determined by IGE and were based upon likely location of the proposed construction, initial impressions and assumptions, accessability, obstacles, etc. IGE also determined depths based upon nature of the proposed work, usual and accepted practice and results of the investigation as it proceeded. All work was 1 1 1 W of 2061 W 65' St, Chanhassen, Minn -2- performed in an attempt to obtain geotechnical data representative of the site. Refer to the attached sketch for boring locations. In addition, they were marked in the field with lath. As the west property line location was not totally assured, borings should be more accurately located in the course of future site surveys. Ground surface elevation at the boring and probe locations and at a few key topographic points was determined to the nearest 0.1' using an engineer's level and referenced to top nut of a fire hydrant on the south side of 65' St W, approximately 150' west of the area investigated, located as shown on the referenced sketch. As there was no conveniently available sea level datum bench mark nearby, this temporary bench mark was assigned an arbitrary reference elevation of 100.00. Elevations are shown on bore logs and on the site sketch. Accuracy of this should not be taken as any greater than the methods used would imply. Again, in the course of further site surveys, elevations of the boring and probe should be more accurately determined in accordance with a sea level datum. FIELD INVESTIGATION The boring and probe were primarily accomplished by the Power Flight Auger (FA) and Hand Auger (HA) methods in accordance with ASTM D 1452, "Standard Practice for Soil Investigation and Sampling by Auger Borings". As the hand auger upper portion of the main boring was advanced in sandy soil, one supplemental test was performed using the "Dynamic Cone Penetrometer" (DCP) method. These procedures are described in attachments at the back of the text portion of this report. The first attachment also describes the soil classification system used (Unified - chart attached) and method of groundwater measurement. A Professional Engineer personally performed the boring and probe and immediately classified soils in the field. Soil strength was determined by said engineer mostly on an empirical basis by such means of drilling ease or difficulty, nature of recovered soil samples, consultation of laboratory and DCP test results, etc. Some samples were bagged and returned to the soils laboratory for further examination and possible testing. Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with ASTM standards. SOIL BORING RESULTS Attached is a log for the boring together with a key explaining terms and entries on the log sheets. Results of the shallower probe are given in more summary form on the continuation sheet of the log for the main boring. The depth of individual layers of soils may vary somewhat from what is shown on the logs due to the inexact nature of auger sampling and, most importantly, the occurrence of transition between soil layers. Also be advised that soil conditions not at the boring and probe locations may vary. Laboratory test (moisture content) results are given in the "w" column of the boring log at the appropriate relative locations. The DCP test result is given in the right -most column of the boring log, again at the appropriate relative location. The borings show a condition of fill over original organic soil, with overly soft soil below. The fill is 2'/4 in the main boring, slightly less in the probe, and consists of topsoil fill [a variably sandy organic lean clay (OL), black] and a mixed soil fill, most of it lean clay, somewhat sandy, dark in color (CL) with a little organic soil (OL). Below, to total depths of 5'/4'& 6'/4 in Boring 1 and Probe IA, respectively, is what appears to be buried original humus, a lean clay, rather silty, highly organic (OL), black. In upper reaches it W of 2061 W 65' St, Chanhassen, Minn -3- might be a borderline sapric peat. The thickness together with the highly organic nature could mean that this originated in a shallow depth swamp. As a minimum, these soils are unsuitable for construction. Application of foundation loads upon them will undoubtedly result in differential settlement and loss of value of the new structure. In addition, modern building codes prohibit establishment of residential structures on or over organic or otherwise unsuitable soil. Below at first in Boring 1 is a lean clay, a little sandy, very dark to dark gray (CL), saturated, very soft to soft (w/ depth). This appears to be a lacustrine (lake origin) deposit. It is "normally consolidated" (consolidated enough to only support its own weight and original soil weight above, not additional weight of fill soils or structures above). The overburdening fill has not been inplace long enough, geologically, to force further consolidation. The moisture content test in this material is 41.9%, high for a lean clay of this nature. It is obviously near or over the liquid limit of this material (est 40°/o+). In such a scenario, the material is very soft, prone to consolidation upon application of further loads. This material extends only from 53/4 to Tin Boring 1, but from 6'/4 to 8'/2 in Probe IA. The first 9" of this material in Probe IA is very soft and is a borderline marl material. Base soil below at first is a lean clay, a little sandy (CL), dark gray, saturated, rather soft to medium (confirmed by another moisture content test). It has inclusions of a poorly graded (biased finer grained) sand with a few fines (SP), also dark gray, saturated, loose to firm (as per DCP test result). Deepest soil, commencing at 11' in Boring 1, is a lean clay, rather sandy, dark gray (CL), low gravel content, medium. Theses materials are glacial till. The sand inclusions in the upper portion are glacial outwash. All of these base mineral soils are suitable for residential construction, with conditions. Refusal to auger advancement was not encountered bypowerboring termination depth, elevation 75+' indicating lack of bedrock at least to this elevation. Groundwater was found in the main boring as evidenced by standing water in the bore hole after a standard period of monitoring, depth 1.8' (elev 96/4x. This is a surprisingly high level given the moderate elevation of the area and its seemingly well drained nature. It is, however, aquifer groundwater, but marginally so. It appears to be contained primarily in the sand inclusions at 7'+. But it also is coming from the upper soft and very soft clay, possibly from the lower organic soil, once a void (the bore hole) became available. Proper construction on the site (removing the softer lean clay, promoting good site drainage) will mitigate some of this. Thus, water found presently can be regarded as a maximum level. It should be pointed out that most of the lower elevation sandier lean clay soils are technically saturated (all pores filled with water), but not waterbearing (capable of releasing this water). This is a normal condition for a soft to medium or better clay. As indicated, the upper lean clay soils, being soft to very soft, do release water. However, be advised, as explained in the attachment, that groundwater may still occur and vary according to various climatological and meteorological influences undetermined within the time frame, scope and budget allowed in this investigation. In addition, area development patterns and drainage alterations can influence soil moisture and groundwater. Bear in mind that indicated results are for time and conditions of testing only. Refer to the boring and probe log for a more detailed description of soils and moisture conditions encountered. W of 2061 W 65th St, Chanhassen, Minn -4- CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon interpreted results of boring and probe logs, including laboratory tests, their relation to the planned work, and other information. Because the boring, probe and tests represent a small portion of the site ' in relation to the proposed area of work, ongoing review of construction should be carried out. If excavations reveal subsurface soils of a different nature than those observed in the boring and probe, or if the location or elevations or type of the planned work are altered significantly, the Soils Engineer should be contracted for possibly revised recommendations or additional testing (see #6 below and the following "Limitations of Investigation"). ' 1. General Site Suitability: Based upon interpreted results of the borings, it appears that the site has some limitations regarding suitability for construction. These mainly consist of the presence of ' fill over buried original topsoil, soft to very soft clay below (thickness varying), high groundwater on the site and the need to adapt the site in general for the intended use. These ' limitations are correctable by adequate site correction, foundation engineering and further monitoring of soils as construction proceeds. 2. Initial Site Preparation: This analysis is based upon the proposed structure being, as indicated earlier, of slab - on -grade or crawl space design with attached garage, grade set to meet City requirements. Exterior footings will be at least 3 '/Z below final grade. Interior footings could be at subslab level ifplaced upon properly compacted fill. Unless marginal soils are left below correction levels, some footings could be lowered if more convenient to deal with unsuitable soil ' levels. All organic, loose, frozen or otherwise unsuitable soil, uncontrolled fill, vegetation, debris and boulders (3"+) and, most importantly in this case, the soft to very soft lean clay, ' should be removed from the proposed building pad area, generally achieving the first naturally occurring suitable soil, likely a rather soft to medium or better somewhat sandy ' lean clay, with waterbearing sand inclusions. Boring evidence suggests that this will amount to excavation depths of at least 7' and 8'/2' at the locations of Boring 1 and Probe IA, respectively. If working room is not adequate for safe excavation backslopes, or perhaps ' just to control excavation and filling extent, footings could be lowered somewhat so that proper oversizing and a safe backslope, not straying onto the neighbor's property, can be provided. But as base soils, even when corrected, are marginal at first, footings in this ' vicinity should not be lowered so much as to rest on or near base soil. There should be at least 2' of properly compacted fill below footings to allow some spread of foundation load ' with depth. It is also noted that areas below slab areas should be corrected as well, not attempting to trench around them. Some discussion should be made about over -excavating out the soft to very soft lean ' clay. Excavators are often reluctant to do this once buried organic soil is cleared. Again it is pointed out that field indications plus a laboratory test indicate this material to be soft to very soft. It is estimated to have a coefficient of consolidation (c.) of 0.15. Applying this ' to the thickness of the soft layer (1'-2) and considering likely new stresses, if this material were not removed, a long term settlement of approximately 1" to 2" would result. This is W of 2061 W 65' St, Chanhassen, Minn -5- excessive for this structure. When obtaining excavation bids, this overexcavation necessity should be clear to excavators so that problems, contractual or otherwise, are less likely to occur later. During the construction phase, the amount of excavation of overly soft clay will necessitate a high degree of judgment. It is possible that full time observation by a soils engineer will be required. Based upon the fact that the excavation will be below water level, water will enter and accumulate in the excavation. This water should be controlled, such as by sumping or other means, so that the bottom of the excavation can be viewed and so that water does not interfere with compaction efforts in the lowest levels. It should again be emphasized, however, that the estimated depths of excavation of unsuitable soil given above are preliminary estimates based upon random but somewhat targeted auger tests. These should be considered preliminary estimates only, to be verified by actual excavations. In fact, for construction quantity purposes, a small amount of additional estimated excavation depth should be added to that given in the logs to conservatively allow for variations and for inadvertent over -excavations which are impossible to avoid when power machinery is employed for the purpose. It is especially cautioned that there could be areas of unsuitable soil not represented by the boring and probe to date. These zones could be grubbed out tree stump pits, an old basement, trash pits, borrow pits, test excavations, utility trenches, etc. Excavators should be especially aware of this possibility. Excavated organic material, uncontrolled fill, wet unstable soil or other soil contaminated with topsoil, vegetation, etc, should be disposed of offsite, or in landscaping areas, where the bearing of weight will not be required. There appears to be no opportunity to salvage excavated mineral soil for re -use as controlled fill as said excavated soil, even if mineral soil, will be cohesive, overmoist and difficult to work with. The excavation contractor will likely import a granular fill. Refer to subsequent sections for more detailed and specific recommendations for site correction recommendations for each structural component. 3. Foundations: For purposes ofproposed construction, foundations and fill to support foundations must rest upon and over mineral (non-organic) soils of adequate bearing value. For the proposed construction, a bearing capacity of 2000 pounds per square foot (psf) is typically targeted. However, most single family residences actually bear much less, even under maximum snow load. This analysis of soil for foundation purposes is based upon the location, design configuration and grade indicated above. If there is any significant deviation from assumptions indicated herein, then these recommendations may have to be reconsidered. The site should be prepared as outlined in #2 above, removing unsuitable soil, including the overly soft clay that exists over the building pad area, performing any further excavation as necessary, controlling water that may enter the excavation and placing controlled fill (minimum 2') as needed. This being done, perimeter and interior footings may be generally designed allowing 2000 psf foundation bearing capacity (likely resulting in ordinary spread or pad footings). This value is recommended on the basis of the fact that the footing areas will rest directly upon fill that has been compacted to the level specified in #5 below. This W of 2061 W 65'" St, Chanhassen, Minn -6- takes into account shear failure potential near footing levels and the nature of deeper soil regarding settlement. Fill, as required, should be placed, compacted, and tested as per the "Fill Placement" (#5) section following. The above should provide a factor of safety against foundation failure of approximately 3. Over-all and differential settlements should be less than '/2" and t/4', respectively. If footing conditions change from what has been assumed herein, further study and analysis would be necessary. If the site is graded to different levels than assumed above, if the type of building proposed change, or if soils of a significantly different nature are discovered during excavations, the Soils Engineer should be contacted for re -analysis and possibly revised recommendations. It is not recommended to place footings upon or over organic soil or any other unsuitable soil or to deviate from recommendations contained herein as excessive differential settlement of the structure could result. 4. Slabs: Slabs and fill to support slabs should also rest upon and over mineral soil of adequate density to resist settlement. Based upon boring evidence, base mineral soils on the site, with uncontrolled fill, organic soil, vegetation and any other encountered unsuitable soil removed and with controlled fill placed thereon as necessary are adequate for slab support. It is not recommended to abate site preparation below slabs in any manner. Slabs should have clearance from maximum anticipated aquifer groundwater level and should be protected from intrusion by surface waters. As indicated above, floor level of this structure should be set in accordance with City requirements, utilizing the level of groundwater found as a maximum level. Good site drainage, both at the time of construction and for the life of the structure, is recommended. 5. Fill Placement: Fill material, as required, should be mineral soil, free of debris, boulders and organic material, of such suitable moisture content that it can be readily compacted to specified levels. Fill should be placed and compacted in a manner that will allow complete compaction of the total fill layer to 95% of Standard Maximum Density according to ASTM D 698. Frozen material should not be used in fill construction, nor should any part of the completed fill be allowed to freeze. A soil compaction test should be conducted for every two feet of fill in appropriate segments of the area. If crushed rock or any other very coarse granular soil or aggregate (>30% 3/4" or coarser) is used, the above Standard Maximum Density would not be applicable. In this case, the fill should be compacted to 60% of Maxim Index Density according to ASTM D 4253. Top of fill should extend at least one foot horizontally beyond the structure pad or footing limits. The fill surface may then extend downward and outward on a 1:1 slope to competent soil. It is upon this basis that required oversizing should be computed. W of 2061 W 65' St, Chanhassen, Minn -7- 6. Inspection and Testing: The Client should retain a geotechnical engineering firm to inspect excavations, make field judgments as to subsoil adequacy, and to carry out a program of field and laboratory testing of engineered fill and possibly other materials. This firm should bear full responsibility for knowledge of contents of this report and for proper interpretation and correlation of data, and be prepared to make any further analysis as necessary. Again, this is especially necessary in this case due to the high degree of judgment necessary regarding first encountered clay soils. 7. Final Site Tonoeranhv: Final soil surfaces should be graded to provide adequate drainage from structures and hard surfaces so that as little water as possible infiltrates into soils adjacent to the structure. LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, has prepared this report using an ordinary level of care and in accordance with generally accepted foundation and soil engineering practices. Because the boring, probe and tests represent only a small portion of the total site and for other reasons, Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, does not warrant that the boring, probe and tests are necessarily representative of the entire site but only of the boring, probe and test locations at the time of investigation. No warranty of the site is made or implied. The scope of this report is limited strictly to geotechnical issues which include establishment of soil profile and only those conclusions expressly made. Please note that this work is not intended to document the presence or absence of any environmental contaminants at the site, nor for identifying applicable local, state or federal laws or regulations of a non -geotechnical nature which may or may not be applicable to this site. Further, Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, cannot be held responsible for facts not disclosed. The bore holes have backfilled the as well as possible using native cuttings. While the deeper Boring 1 did not produce an Environmental Bore Hole as defined by Minnesota Department of Health regulations, Bentonite was added to the cuttings during the backfilling process. However, some continuing settlement may occur if construction does not take place in the near future. If settlement does occur, the Client should backfill with additional soil. This report and all supporting information is furnished only to the Client and his assigns for the designated purpose. No representations to other parties or for other uses are made. Soil samples retrieved during the investigation process were classified in the field by a Soils Engineer. Most of them were immediately discarded. Samples returned to the laboratory will be held for a period of 30 days unless a request is received to retain them for a longer period. W of 2061 W 65' St, Chanhassen, Minn -8- ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. INTERSTATE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, Inc r A z� 04 1? Patrick J Hines, PE, Presidentp�v`p,ENSFo FS Bio- Date Registration No. 12086 p * 12086 4 Proofed by: SC y= STATE T1s_ OF :'97 17 METHOD OF INVESTIGATION AUGER BORINGS The Auger Boring procedure is one of the simplest methods of soil in- vestigation and sampling. Its limitations are that recovered samples are disturbed samples, and that depth of possible investigation is limited by various factors. Depending upon skill of the operator or crew chief, various engineering properties of soil, such as soil profile, estimated inplace strength, etc, may be determined by this method. It may also be used to retrieve samples for laboratory testing and determination of suitability of soil for other purposes.This describes the most often procedures used. In this procedure, augers are advanced into the ground by hydraulic/ mechanical means. At intervals, usually 5', the auger withdrawn and soil samples are retrieved and classified, retaining samples as necessary for ft.rther analysis. Record data includes depth to changes in strata, descrip- tion of soil in each major stratum, groundwater depth or elevation where found, and other information. This is in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Designation: D 1452-80, "Standard Practice for Soil Investigation and Sampling by auger Borings". Sometimes, hand auger borings of various types are used to accomplish the same purpose. However, penetration depth is usually limited. Its advan- tage is greater accuracy and the fact that a hand auger boring may be the only type possible where access is limited for power auger machinery. (over) 11 GROUNDWATER To check for groundwater, the boring is usually probed for the ' presence of water (1) inside the hollow -stem auger, prior to auger withdrawal, (2) in the bore hole, immediately after auger withdrawal, t and (3) again in the bore hole after a sufficient amount for groundwater ' to accumulate and stabilize therein. It is emphasized that indicated results are for the time and condi- ' tions of testing only. Groundwater can fluctuate as a function of many variables. ' SOIL CLASSIFICATION ' Recovered soil samples are usually first classified by the drilling crew chief in the field and then verified by the Soils Engineer short- ' ly thereafter. Selected soil samples may be subject to a program of laboratory tests. Unless otherwise indicated, the soil classification ' system used is ASTM Designation: D 2488-84, "Standard Practice for ' Description and Identification of Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure). This is also known as the Unified Soil Classification System. ' Other soil classification systems may be used, such as AASHTO, USDA, Mn/DOT, etc. If an alternate system is used, it will be noted and described ' noted in the main body of the report. Attachment to hngineenng Keport Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc METHOD OF 1N V ES 11(iA 1 IUN Dynamic Cone Penetrometer 1 he Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DUP) procedure is an increasingly accepted method to investigate soil in limited zones, to augment existing testing, or to test in relatively isolated or inaccessible areas. It is a relatively lightweight device that evaluates soil consistency and density. It is "dynamic", versus static, in that it utilizes a lalling weight in the testing. The device utilizes a 15# steel ring weight falling 20" on an E -rod slide (see sketch below). At the end of the E -rod assembly is a specially shaped cone that is driven into the soil by repeated drops of the hammer on the anvil. The cone is slightly enlarged at its base to minimize shaft resistance above. The test is either made at existing surface level, but most likely through an augered hole (see separate "Auger Borings" procedure). Soil profile is established through this latter procedure. At test depth, the cone is seated 2" (the `set") into undisturbed soil for proper embedment. The cone point is then further driven I'/," by the 15# hammer dropping 20". The blows to drive the cone 1'/," into the soil are counted and recorded. Sometimes, a second and third penetration can be made in this same set. By successively advancing the bore hole and adding rods, tests can be made at various levels. This procedure may be used to depths of up to 15 or 20 feet. Rod u,loul anvil 15 lb sleet .inq weigh, ing anvil Sliding Drive Hammer Cone Point Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION ,Ali' ar Diyeiom Group Typiol nanla I L{bonlory classffsouou aiteria 1"q Well -grades smelt. gnvd•und CY+D—Miter man 6: Ci.. tD_I• R.rrem I ane 7 GW mixtures, link or no fines D-• O..,0. g - s w - - L = GP Poorly (laded Sta,ds. Pavel- - No, mening 3l1 gradation requirements for Gla' sand manures. utk or no fines 3 `- c Z d i GMHu Silty Stavds. grave{-and-sah v n Alterberg limns below "A" e _ c" ' mruurvs V _ _• = w line or P.I. Icss than a Above "A" line ,nth P.I. Mi r _ ' _ " �% j bin-een a and ' arc bix. Z- - Z 3 - derffnr ase requiring use - 7 Clayey gnsels. an,el-sand:lav Atterberg limits abo,e'•A•• of dual smbots GC mtatum _ - _ _ line nth P.1. Stoller than 7 _ v ° 3 e: X Z11 -graded sands. Sta,<11, - Cu • D—' pets, :han a: Cr. ID_' Sn.e- I and J SW, wads, tilde or no fims c - n 01 D a0_ - a 2 L = _ s X y -= SP Poorl) Qadcd sands, stra,cily ? r... - vol meaning all gradation reauiremms, for SW e 3 � _ � sands, lave or r1" fines o e o i c v Z a o e c - i I SM d $ln• sands, sand.,lh �_ w = : Y •„ 'v Allabag limits Snow -A- Limns plaiting in hatched _ e : mt,lurrs " _ _ _ _ IiM or P.I.:ess :Asn a anP.I. bweren Y — 3 - —== =S leadd we ' we bordnl¢e cash g _ : - = 9 requtnn{ use of duan sym- K {artilay nna. Clayey sandy. d u Y t Atac.b rg Ilmna abCK "A" Zs I to:a X o line wth P.I. (rote.:han' Ino pme "itsand ivy tine NL sands. rock flour. silty m cL7yn I 60 1 fine sands or clayey tall, nm ; Fa ruoull. aon of fir.,-sraaxd a - slight plaaaaty - v,lt and fine fraction of coaru, Inorganic dan of lo+ to me• 50 paned vols, = plasnrirv• paves. days. ♦uereer L+m,u alon:n m a t - CL aamhr•.• area ue eoraenit r:anl sand sandy clap, Stn' days. lean danmm reecmng use ei eus 40 t•moolr. / I Js -2 PI -0 "3 -LL Xn = Organic ahs and orlanic uhy o Z = OL I lap of low plasttnq c 10 Inorganic oats. maviceaus at - - •'�'n0 wHl r -I d 20 a S i MH d'uaomactous fine sand, or 1111" Will. dulit cells _— < _ : -' CH Irsorgamc ;Ian of high plan- 10 7 = only. fat .'.an 7--J ti - Organic clan of medium :0 0 to 20 30 •sd !o 60 70 so 90 IWC _ < _? OH high pllat Kia)• orpnle Was 5 _ Peal any aha A,g,11v r -glow l+uwd L mn _ a sods I t a Probe lA Elev — 9' Z 0 Boring No 1 Elev = 98.1 W 66th Street q BENCH MARK Top nut fire hydrant on south side of street, approx a.n east line extended of "parent" lot; Elev= 100.00 (arbitrary) LOCATIONS OF Patrick J_ Hines, PE SOIL BORINGS 8167 100th $t S Cottage Grove,MN 55046 SCALE: 1" = 20' 1 DRAWN BY PH DATE: 24 Oct 2014 Proposed Single 612 414'57' Family Residence West of 2061 W 66th Street Chanhassen, Minnesota Client: James Rudos Minnetonka, Minn JV1L DV1C11,V LVb St S Patrick J Hines, PE 8167 100th Cottage Grove MN 55016 Proposed Single Family Residence PROJEICT: West of 2061 W b5th St, Chanhassen, Minn LOG OF BORING NO: 1 DEPT SURFACE ELEVATION: 98.1 SAMrLE LAB 3 OTHER TESTS IN GEOLOGY N WS DE S: TYPE R I W DE�p.L. L L -1 - FEET RI PTIONANDCLASS[FICATION I set ue (LEAN CLAY, variably sandy, Organic (OL To soilN 1 HA 1 Black, w/ tr's mineral Soil, Fill + 1 very moist, loose to firm MAN CLAY, somewhat sandy, Pred Dark Gray (CL) Fill96.+ ( 2 HA z 2} w/ a little Organic Soil, w/ tr gr z j moist to very moist, loose to firm 3 •LEAN CLAY, rather silty, Organic (OL) Buried 3HA Black, w/ small roots, tr's undecom- Humus 4 posed vegetation, saturated, rather borderline Sapric Peat in soft 5 per por tion Ell lighter, less organic, w/ depth 5.756 Lacustrine Y 4 HA 41.9 LEAN CLAY, a itt a Ran y, ery Darkto ]LEAN j Gray (CL), very soft to soft (w/ Deposit j des. h) 7} 1 I I i , poorly graded pre ine gr, w Glacial Y 5 LLA 8/13 med, tr ca), w/ a few fines, Dark Gray Till, w/ 8- (SP), saturated, loose to firm Outwashl Y 6 FA 25•6 banded w/ LEAN CLAY, a little sandy, inclusion j 9- Dark Gray (CL), saturated, rather soft I soft to medium @ 8P+ 10 more bands of clay, less of sand, w/ depth 11 I LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray Glacial N 7 FA j 12_ 1` (CL), w/ a little gravel Till saturated, medium 14-1 I ( I 151 N 8 FA 16- 6 I 17- 17-18- 181 19 I j 20 I ! I I BreeJ 21 dedthe SW 0-5 rrpht tlyClear, l Inex ��F* id ('�3 ) 70 F±, -i WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS DRILLING DATA Clear, DATE SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN ORILLING iMUC WATER ' E_JL DEP74 DE7'N DEFTM LEVE LEVEL Crew Chiet.__ DH Method. 3" Hand & 4" Power Flight* Augers *Mobile B-31 Drill I 23 Oct 16:29 71t None 3.8' 24 Oct 13.51 5' 1,8' Rig on Dodge Power Wagon " 14:35 to 23' 6J1 3}' Calmenced: 23 Octo er Completed. 24 October 2014 j „Bonpg 15:201 5J1 2.1 pairrjrk l 8i>—s FK PROJECT: BUIL BORING LOU (continued) LOG OF BORING NO: 816; 100th St S Cotte•g� r.nlin MN 45016' DEPTH SURFACE ELEVATION: 98.1 SAMPLE LAB b OTHER TESTS IN GEOLOGY N W6 TYPE R W DE L.L. FEET DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION P. L.. LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray (CL Glacial N 9 FA w/ tr to a little gravel Till 22 saturated, medium I End of Boring - No Refusal hole void backfilled w/ native .ngs mixed w/ Bentonite on 24 ier 2014 Probe 1A - Elev = 97.8 2 0-6}' Topsoil Fill, Fill (S1 less 29 than Boring 1), Buried Humus 6}'-7' Lean Clay, possibly Marl, 30 Gray, saturated, very soft 7'-8}' Lean Clay, rather silty, Dark 31 Gray, saturated, very soft to soft 8}'-10}' Lean Clay+.. w/ band inclusions, 32 Dark Gray, saturated, soft to 331 Probe put down by power flight auger method on 24 October 2014 6 ummed�r 34-J ately backfilled w/ native cuttings Imixed w/ Bentonite 35 36�37 38- 39- 40- 41-1 39441 42�43 i 441 45�46 Patrick J Hines, PE DEPTH IN FEET i PROJECT: ___BORING LOG KFY LOG OF BORING NO: T SURFACE ELEVATION' GEOLOGY1 N DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION 8167 LOOth St r Cottage Crove MN 55016 SAMPLE I LAB i OTMER TESTS 1 /f , TYPE R I W DE p L' i � I `• I I I I �I 1 1 Soil Classification., using Origin visual -manual arc/er '_abcra- cf Soil \ \ t 8� tory methods, accroding to the \ \ \ 1 ' Unified Soil Classification` {{{i Sy -tem, or to ot`:ar s^ste>a as •� � I f appr:.priite \ i i ' I v. ATEA LEVE, Mi ASJ=L.•F' TS r ' 1 TYt IL.• .f�I l.Il ..� � ij sl Y �ilr. ��,.. w••:q 7 1 Other D'ta as I 1.^tter;erS I Liair, A ' ?nT'_ece A ile^J:r;.i �--- Cnnte..)t^ 1 : 1 1 - _LerFrin of SF14I� %eCJV ci Ed '. _.Ft �R,t l'4DATA_ _ _. _..... "-� Value — Surber ' I rf blows to dTivt Split -Barrel Sas-I I pler one loon I I li- Hater Be3rirg ES :' = Yes' I No i y'= %ate- 'A _ -- Leel S,rbci r I Sar.Dle Nu -Ser i Auger � Sac;t.-.• Tnbe I---- I ' I v. ATEA LEVE, Mi ASJ=L.•F' TS r ' 1 TYt IL.• .f�I l.Il ..� � ij sl Y �ilr. ��,.. w••:q 7 1 Other D'ta as I 1.^tter;erS I Liair, A ' ?nT'_ece A ile^J:r;.i �--- Cnnte..)t^ 1 : 1 1 - _LerFrin of SF14I� %eCJV ci Ed '. _.Ft �R,t l'4DATA_ _ _. _..... CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE RESOLUTION NO: MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION CREATING TWO PARCELS AT 2061 WEST 65TH STREET WHEREAS, John J. Corey and Kimberly E. Corey, husband and wife (" Property Owners") have requested a subdivision of their property into two lots of 15,165 square feet and 15,159 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council held a public hearing on November 24, 2014, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance. N�1'L RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council: 1. ity Council Resolution 2014-78 is rescinded. 2. The following metes and bounds subdivision of 2061 West 6514 Street (Planning Case #2014- 30) for property legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, Carver County, Minnesota is approved: PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION'S Pueel I The west 9750 feet of lot 3, Block 2. MOLINE'S .ADDITION" accmdmg to fhe recorded Plat thereof. CRer Comh• kfismeao� Y�airta+ ea,m— fm Jr r re ad titily purposes met un&t and across the nonherly 10 00 fere The sootherh 10 00 feet & easterly SAORet ral wemtly 5 00 het dKft-d Parcell Thn pun of l a 3. Block 2. MMES ADDITION. according to ILe recorded plat thereof. Cann Cmmnv 9Lmesm WMch Les em otee wo 97 50 Slee, loplon, wsth easesomes fm dnc oge and utrhw purposes over under and aaoss the aa¢therh16 00 feet: the soitherh' 1000 tat do t=Wiy 5.001W aed the oOdy 500 het tkaeof 3. Approval of the metes and bounds subdivision is conditioned upon the Property Owner's executing the Development Contract approved by the City Council and the recording of the Development Contract with Carver County. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this day 2015. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Clerk/Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor YES NO ABSENT INTERSTATE GEOTECHNICRL ENG PHONE NO. : 651 769 2467 Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc Patrick J Hines, PE 8167 We St S Cottage Grove -MN 55016 (612)414-5770 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET DATE: 13 November 2014 SENT TO: Att'n: Building Inspection? COMPANY: City of Chanhassen FAX #: 7,11 90 Proposed e ami MyResidence RE: W of 2061 W 6511 St Chanhasen, Minn FROM: Patrick J Hines PE NUMBER OF PAGES (Including this cover sbeet): 2 Nov. 13 2014 11:05AM P1 Please call (612) 414.5770 if you did not receive acceptable quality of transmission or if any pages are missing. Comments: Letter regarding groundwater on the above site, sent as per request of my client. PH RECEIVED Nou � 3 2o�a ,,,,CCEN 1NSPEC��l1S FROM : INTERSTATE GEOTECHNICAL ENG PHONE NO. : 651 769 2467 Nov. 13 2014 11:05AM P2 Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc Patrick J Hines, PE 8167 10& St s Cottage Grove MN 55016 (612)414-5770 13 November 2014 Mr James Rudos 14846 TimberMll Road Minnetonka MN 55345 Re: Subsurface Soil Investigation Proposed Single Family Residence W of 2061 W 65'" St, Chanhassen, Minn This is in response to your contact of recent regarding groundwater on this project. As you know, I investigated the lot last month and issued a report dated 25 October 2014. I found a total of 7' & 81/2 of unsuitable soil at the locations of Boring I & Probe 1 A, respectively, in the form of topsoil fill, general and varying fill, buried original humus and overly soft clay or marl. First suitable base soil is a loose to firm sand or a soft to medium lean clay. I recommended removing these materials and placing controlled fill, noting that you will have to seriously control groundwater in the process. Regarding groundwater, I found it very high on this site - at a stabilized level of 1.8'. As I understand it, The City of Chanhassen has asked if this water level will change as a result of site correction. I used as a stabilized water level the 1.8' found a day after the hand auger phase was completed. I had encountered water while drilling and did achieve the base granular soil that first day. When I did the power auger phase, water was creeping up to nearly the same level a few hours later, so I felt that the 1.8' is valid. I believe that, when you correct this lot, controlling groundwater, and compacting fill, most likely granular, the groundwaterwill soon rebound to its original level - 1.8' as found in my boring. If you construct ordinary and good site drainage on your finished project, groundwater will not be affected by any artificial recharge the result of your activities. If you have any additional questions on this, or if I can be of assistance in any additional capacity, do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, INTERSTATE GEOTECHNI duQh/41 ERING, Inc J. 4 I 1 r C" r u,S 5Ln r cn r1�:CAm ^! y� pf,.`�6trSF�tisO 1Ir �M1T 1 OR -"'T - �r fn�U, r.1F It DlRC.0 Patrick J Hines. PE a s v o* 1E. . ' ' ' ::' I a.:3 A D_, Y t,IOE I37 -D r�, rcSSIONAL President r b"- STATE '¢ 'dEE4 l i' c i THE i 'A VV OF THE- STATE OF N111%M50TA o�:a pH/SC �i`1e+``S(oNf0.�Ee`��,,, DATE: 13 e `( Y MINNESOTA REG. N0. `ZCX4 Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc Patrick J Hines, PE 8167100* St S Cottage Grove MN 55016 (612)414-5770 25 October 2014 Mr James Rudos 14846 Timber Hill Road Minnetonka MN 55345 Re: Subsurface Soil Investigation Proposed Single Family Residence W of 2061 W 650i St, Chanhassen, Minn CITY OF CHANHASSEt RECEIVED NOV 0 4 2014 rHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT In accordance with your authorization, I have completed the above referenced investigation to determine site suitability for the proposed construction. A summary of my findings together with boring logs and my conclusions and recommendations are presented in the enclosed report. I found, as you already have been briefed, more than usual problems with the site. There is a total of 5'/4'& 61/4 at the locations of Boring 1 & Probe 1 A, respectively, of unsuitable soil in the form of topsoil fill, general and varying fill, and buried original humus. Below at first is a low sand content lean clay, generally dark in color, saturated, very soft to soft (w/ depth). It is "normally consolidated" (consolidated enough to only support its own weight, not additional weight of fill soils or structures above). The overburdening fill has not been inplace long enough to force further consolidation. The moisture content test in this material indicated nearly 42%, high for a lean clay. This material extends only from 5'/4 to 7' in Boring 1, but from 61/4 to 83/Z in Probe 1A. The first 9" of this material in Probe lA is very soft and is a borderline marl material. All of the aforementioned materials are unsuitable for structure support should be removed. I do acknowledge that excavators are often reluctant to excavate further once the buried organic soil is cleared, so understandings should be inplace at the time of gathering bids. Base soil below at first is a lean clay, a little sandy, dark gray, saturated, rather soft to medium. It has inclusions of a poorly graded (biased finer grained) sand with a few fines, also dark gray, saturated, loose to firm. Deepest soil, commencing at I Pin Boring 1, is a lean clay, rather sandy, dark gray, low gravel content, medium. Theses materials are glacial till. The sand inclusions in the upper portion are glacial outwash. All of these base mineral soils are suitable for residential construction, with conditions. Refusal to auger advancement was not encountered by boring termination depth of 23', indicating lack of bedrock to this level. Very importantly, groundwater was found in the main Boring at 1.8' (elev 961/4±). It is aquifer groundwater, but marginally so. It appears to be contained primarily in the sand inclusions at 7'+. But it also is coming from the upper soft and very soft clay, possibly from SCANNED Mr James Rudos 25 October 2014 Page 2 the lower organic soil. Proper construction on the site (removing the softer lean clay, promoting good site drainage) will mitigate some of this. Thus, water found presently can be regarded as a maximum level. Slab grade of the proposed residence should be set in accordance with City requirements utilizing this level. I recommend complete removal of all unsuitable soil which is likely to be the fill and buried organic soil as encountered plus the overly soft clay found in both the boring and probe. While this amounts only to another V/4 in the vicinity of Boring 1, it is another 2'+ in the vicinity of Probe IA. As indicated, excavators may be reluctant to excavate below organic soil level, but it is necessary (see longer discussion in the report). It is so important that fall time inspection of the excavation by a soils engineer may be necessary. Of course, other zones of unsuitable soil not represented by the boring and probe could still be encountered due to the nature of small volume random sampling. Any other depths or zones of unsuitable soil should be removed as well. You could lower footings somewhat so that you have to provide less oversizing and not stray onto the neighbor's property. But footings here should not be lowered so much as to rest directly upon the suitable base soil as it is only marginally suitable. You need a little fill (2' is recommended) to spread footing loads out with depth. Footings may be generally designed allowing the usual 2000 psf foundation bearing capacity, which will likely result in normal strip or pad footings. Special attention is again drawn to the advisory that excavations be examined by the Soils Engineer to verify soil boring results and to document adequacy of site preparation. Again this is very important as how much soft/very soft clay must be removed will require a high degree of field judgment. Fill, as used, should be tested for compaction adequacy. Soil correction should not be abated below slabs in any manner (ie, do not let the excavator try to "trench around" slab areas). Thank you for the opportunity to have been of service. If you have any questions on this, or if I can be of assistance in any additional capacity, do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, TATE GE-OTECI-INICAL ENGINEERING, Inc a 'ck J mes, PE President enclosures pIVSC SOIL BORING LOG Patrick J Hines, PE s PROJECT: 8167 100th St S Cottage Grove MN 55016 LOG OF BORING NO: DEPTH SURFACE ELEVATION: 98.1 SAM?LE LAB 3 OTHER TESTS IN GEOLOGY N WB FEET DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION {II TYPE I R I W jDE.qL.L.- ILEAN CLAY, variablysand Organic OL P L• set _ ue Y, g ( Topsoil I N 1 HA •1 Black, w/ tr s mineral Soil, Fill very moist, loose to firm CLAY, somewhat sandy, Pred Dark Gray (CL) 2>? w/ a -little Organic Soil, w/ trgr Fill moist to ve moist loose to fins 3 LEAN CLAY, rather silty, Organic (OL) Buried Lborderline k, w/ small roots, tr's undecom- Humus 4d vegetation, saturated, rather Sapric Peat in soft 5r ortion `5.75 sl lighter, less organic, w/ de th 6 LEAN WAY, a itt a son y, ery arc to Lacustrine 1Dark Gray (CL), very soft to soft (w/ Deposit dept ,poor y gra a pre ne gr, w Glacial Imed, tr cs), w/ a few fines, bark Gray Till, w/ (SP) ,'saturated, loose to firm ` Outwash banded w/ LEAN CLAY, a little sandy, IinclusionE 9-I Dark Gray (CL), saturated, rather soft) soft to medium @ 8}'+ 10 more bands of clay, less of sand, w/ depth 11 LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray Glacial 121(CL), w/ a little gravel Till saturated, medium 13J 14 I 15� 16 III 17= 18) 20 WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS DATE I TIM SAMPLED DEPTH CASING DE Prs CAVE-INGRILLING DEPTH YUD LEVE WATER LEVEL 23 Oct l 16:29 7 ' None 3.8' 24 Oct 13:51 5' 1.8' t " 14:35 to 23' 6}' V " _ I 15:20 5}' 2.1' 96}±)2 I RA I 3 HA Y 4 HA 41.9 Y 1 5 1 HA Y 6 FA LMIRMS".1 M"E , 25. SW a DRILLING DATA 7J , 8%13 I i mph± BreeJ tly Clear,j 7h° Crew Chiet __ pH Method: 3" Hand & 4" Power Flight* Augers *Mobile B-31 Drill Rig on Dodge Power Wagon Coamenced: 23 ---- -- 8onng Completed: 24 October 2014 BOIL BORING LOG (continued) ft"I�-k J fffa—% PR E16: 100th St S Cottog- r�n.in MN 45016` Proposed Single Family Residence PROJECT: West of 2061 65th St, Chanhassen, Minn LOG OF BORING NO: 1 DEPTH SURFACE ELEVATION: 98.1 SAMPLE LAB S OTHER TESTS IN GEOLOGY NWB FEET DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION iM TYPE R I W DE L -LL; LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray (Cl; Glacial N 9 FA 22 w/ tr to a little gravel Till saturated, medium K, End of Boring - No Refusal hole void backfilled w/ native ings mixed w/ Bentonite on 24 ber 2014 27 Probe 1A - Elev = 97.8 20-6}' Topsoil Fill, Fill (Sl less i29 than Boring 1), Buried Humus 1 61'-7' Lean Clay, possibly Marl, 30 Gray, saturated, very soft 7'-8}' Lean Clay, rather silty, Dark 31J Gray, saturated, vel soft to soft 8}'-10}' Lean Clays. w/ band inclusio`n's, 32 Dark Gray, saturated, soft to medium 33 Probe put down by power flight auger I method on 24 October 2014 6 ummedW 34 ately backfilled w/ native cuttings mixed w/ Bentonite 35 36) 37 3! M 41 42 43 I h Probe 1. Elev = Boring No 1 Elev = 98.1 W 66th Street BENCH MARK- Top nut fire hydrant on south side of street, approz an east line eztended,of "parent" lot; Elevi" 100.00 (may) LOCATIONS OF Patrick J Hines, PE SOIL BORINGS 8167 lOQth St S Cottage Grov-e..MN 55016 SCALE: 1" = 201 DRAWN BY pH DArE: 24 Oct 2014 Proposed Single 612 -41 `-57-:0 Family Residence West of 2061 W 66th Street Chanhassen, Minnesota Client: James Rudos Minnetonka, Minn SUBSURFACE GEOTECIINICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE W of 2061 W 65 h St, Chanhassen, Minnesota CITY OFCHANHASSEP i RECEIVED NOV 0 4 2014 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Prepared by: Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc 8167 100' Street S Cottage Grove MN 55016 25 October 2014 SCANNED Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc Patrick J Hines, PE 8167 100'" St S Cottage Grove MN 55016 (612)414-5770 REPORT of SUBSURFACE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE West of 2061 W 65"' St, Chanhassen, Minnesota 25 October 2014 SCOPE OF SERVICES Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, hereafter referred to as "IGE", was retained by James Rudos, hereafter referred to as the "Client", to perform a subsurface soil investigation on a parcel of land located as noted in the above title block. The purpose of this investigation is, as this is a "lot split", to identify and evaluate soil and water properties associated with the site with respect to constructing a single family residence thereon. One primary soil boring was performed hand and power flight auger methods to a depth of 23' within the project area. In addition, laboratory tests were run upon selected soil samples, and a shallower probe was put down to further delineate depth and extent of unsuitable soil. From the resulting data, conclusions are drawn regarding site suitability for the proposed use and recommendations are developed, based upon information gathered to date within the presently authorized scope of services, for site correction procedures and foundation and slab design. SITE OBSERVATIONS The general area is suburban residential in nature, moderate in elevation. Vicinity structures vary in age and design, but are generally newer, in good condition. What is noted, however, is that depths of installation seem to be rather shallow. This site is rather level in terrain pattern, flat from street grade. There is an abandoned wastewater treatment mound on the site. The site is covered mainly by short maintained grasses, with trees and brush, mostly to the rear, and landscaping plants at various locations. Proposed construction on the site is a single family residence. It most likely will be of slab -on -grade or crawl space design configuration with attached garage. Location was not known, but most likely it will be at setbacks similar to those in the vicinity, possibly slightly more to the front. Given site grade versus street level, the site will be built up P-2' in any event for positive drainage. It is assumed that the residence will be of usual wood frame design with most building loads transferred to exterior and interior strip footings at frost protection depth (3.5' or greater below finished grade). This type of structure imparts relatively light loads onto foundation soil. BORING LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS The boring and probe locations were determined by IGE and were based upon likely location of the proposed construction, initial impressions and assumptions, accessability, obstacles, etc. IGE also determined depths based upon nature of the proposed work, usual and accepted practice and results of the investigation as it proceeded. All work was W of 2061 W 65' St, Chanhassen, Minn -2- performed in an attempt to obtain geotechnical data representative of the site. Refer to the attached sketch for boring locations. In addition, they were marked in the field with lath. As the west property line location was not totally assured, borings should be more accurately located in the course of future site surveys. Ground surface elevation at the boring and probe locations and at a few key topographic points was determined to the nearest 0.1' using an engineer's level and referenced to top nut of a fire hydrant on the south side of 65th St W, approximately 150' west of the area investigated, located as shown on the referenced sketch. As there was no conveniently available sea level datum bench mark nearby, this temporarybench mark was assigned an arbitrary reference elevation of 100.00. Elevations are shown on bore logs and on the site sketch. Accuracy of this should not be taken as any greater than the methods used would imply. Again, in the course of further site surveys, elevations of the boring and probe should be more accurately determined in accordance with a sea level datum. FIELD INVESTIGATION The boring and probe were primarily accomplished by the Power Flight Auger (FA) and Hand Auger (HA) methods in accordance with ASTM D 1452, "Standard Practice for Soil Investigation and Sampling by Auger Borings". As the hand auger upper portion of the main boring was advanced in sandy soil, one supplemental test was performed using the "Dynamic Cone Penetrometer" (DCP) method. These procedures are described in attachments at the back of the text portion of this report. The first attachment also describes the soil classification system used (Unified - chart attached) and method of groundwater measurement. A Professional Engineer personally performed the boring and probe and immediately classified soils in the field. Soil strength was determined by said engineer mostly on an empirical basis by such means of drilling ease or difficulty, nature of recovered soil samples, consultation of laboratory and DCP test results, etc. Some samples were bagged and returned to the soils laboratory for further examination and possible testing. Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with ASTM standards. SOIL BORING RESULTS Attached is a log for the boring together with a key explaining terms and entries on the log sheets. Results of the shallower probe are given in more summary form on the continuation sheet of the log for the main boring. The depth of individual layers of soils may vary somewhat from what is shown on the logs due to the inexact nature of auger sampling and, most importantly, the occurrence of transition between soil layers. Also be advised that soil conditions not at the boring and probe locations may vary. Laboratory test (moisture content) results are given in the "w" column of the boring log at the appropriate relative locations. The DCP test result is given in the right -most column of the boring log, again at the appropriate relative location. The borings show a condition of fill over original organic soil, with overly soft soil below. The fill is 2'/4 in the main boring, slightly less in the probe, and consists of topsoil fill [a variably sandy organic lean clay (OL), black] and a mixed soil fill, most of it lean clay, somewhat sandy, dark in color (CL) with a little organic soil (OL). Below, to total depths of 5'/4& 0/4 in Boring I and Probe IA, respectively, is what appears to be buried original humus, a lean clay, rather silty, highly organic (OL), black. In upper reaches it W of 2061 W 65'^ St, Chanhassen, Minn -3- might be a borderline sapric peat. The thickness together with the highly organic nature could mean that this originated in a shallow depth swamp. As a minimum, these soils are unsuitable for construction. Application of foundation loads upon them will undoubtedly result in differential settlement and loss of value of the new structure. In addition, modern building codes prohibit establishment of residential structures on or over organic or otherwise unsuitable soil. Below at first in Boring I is a lean clay, a little sandy, very dark to dark gray (CL), saturated, very soft to soft (w/ depth). This appears to be a lacustrine (lake origin) deposit. It is "normally consolidated" (consolidated enough to only support its own weight and original soil weight above, not additional weight of fill soils or structures above). The overburdening fill has not been inplace long enough, geologically, to force further consolidation. The moisture content test in this material is 41.9%, high for a lean clay of this nature. It is obviously near or over the liquid limit of this material (est 40%+). In such a scenario, the material is very soft, prone to consolidation upon application of further loads. This material extends only from 5'/4 to Tin Boring 1, but from 61/4 to 8'/2 in Probe IA. The first 9" of this material in Probe IA is very soft and is a borderline marl material. Base soil below at first is a lean clay, a little sandy (CL), dark gray, saturated, rather soft to medium (confirmed by another moisture content test). It has inclusions of a poorly graded (biased finer grained) sand with a few fines (SP), also dark gray, saturated, loose to firm (as per DCP test result). Deepest soil, commencing at 11' in Boring 1, is a lean clay, rather sandy, dark gray (CL), low gravel content, medium. Theses materials are glacial till. The sand inclusions in the upper portion are glacial outwash. All of these base mineral soils are suitable for residential construction, with conditions. Refusal to auger advancement was not encountered bypower boring termination depth, elevation 75±1 indicating lack of bedrock at least to this elevation. Groundwater was found in the main boring as evidenced by standing water in the bore hole after a standard period of monitoring, depth 1.8' (elev 96/4x. This is a surprisingly high level given the moderate elevation of the area and its seemingly well drained nature. It is, however, aquifer groundwater, but marginally so. It appears to be contained primarily in the sand inclusions at 7'+. But it also is coming from the upper soft and very soft clay, possibly from the lower organic soil, once a void (the bore hole) became available. Proper construction on the site (removing the softer lean clay, promoting good site drainage) will mitigate some of this. Thus, water found presently can be regarded as a maximum level. It should be pointed out that most of the lower elevation sandier lean clay soils are technically saturated (all pores filled with water), but not waterbearing (capable of releasing this water). This is a normal condition for a soft to medium or better clay. As indicated, the upper lean clay soils, being soft to very soft, do release water. However, be advised, as explained in the attachment, that groundwater may still occur and vary according to various climatological and meteorological influences undetermined within the time frame, scope and budget allowed in this investigation. In addition, area development patterns and drainage alterations can influence soil moisture and groundwater. Bear in mind that indicated results are for time and conditions of testing only. Refer to the boring and probe log for a more detailed description of soils and moisture conditions encountered. W of 2061 W 65' St, Chanhassen, Minn 4 - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon interpreted results of boring and probe logs, including laboratory tests, their relation to the planned work, and other information. Because the boring, probe and tests represent a small portion of the site in relation to the proposed area of work, ongoing review of construction should be carred out. If excavations reveal subsurface soils of a different nature than those observed in the boring and probe, or if the location or elevations or type of the planned work are altered significantly, the Soils Engineer should be contracted forpossibly revised recommendations or additional testing (see #6 below and the following "Limitations of Investigation"). 1. General Site Suitability: Based upon interpreted results of the borings, it appears that the site has some limitations regarding suitability for construction. These mainly consist of the presence of fill over buried original topsoil, soft to very soft clay below (thickness varying), high groundwater on the site and the need to adapt the site in general for the intended use. These limitations are correctable by adequate site correction, foundation engineering and further monitoring of soils as construction proceeds. 2. Initial Site Preparation: This analysis is based upon the proposed structure being, as indicated earlier, of slab - on -grade or crawl space design with attached garage, grade set to meet City requirements. Exterior footings will be at least 3 �/2 below final grade. Interior footings could be at subslab level if placed upon properly compacted fill. Unless marginal soils are left below correction levels, some footings could be lowered if more convenient to deal with unsuitable soil levels. All organic, loose, frozen or otherwise unsuitable soil, uncontrolled fill, vegetation, debris and boulders (3"+) and, most importantly in this case, the soft to very soft lean clay, should be removed from the proposed building pad area, generally achieving the first naturally occurring suitable soil, likely a rather soft to medium or better somewhat sandy lean clay, with waterbearing sand inclusions. Boring evidence suggests that this will amount to excavation depths of at least 7' and W/z at the locations of Boring 1 and Probe 1A, respectively. If working room is not adequate for safe excavation backslopes, or perhaps just to control excavation and filling extent, footings could be lowered somewhat so that proper oversizing and a safe backslope, not straying onto the neighbor's property, can be provided. But as base soils, even when corrected, are marginal at first, footings in this vicinity should not be lowered so much as to rest on or near base soil. There should be at least 2' of properly compacted fill below footings to allow some spread of foundation load with depth. It is also noted that areas below slab areas should be corrected as well, not attempting to trench around them. Some discussion should be made about over -excavating out the soft to very soft lean clay. Excavators are often reluctant to do this once buried organic soil is cleared. Again it is pointed out that field indications plus a laboratory test indicate this material to be soft to very soft. It is estimated to have a coefficient of consolidation (cJ of 0.15. Applying this to the thickness of the soft layer (1'-2') and considering likely new stresses, if this material were not removed, a long term settlement of approximately 1" to 2" would result. This is W of 2061 W 65' St, Chanhassen, Minn -5- excessive for this structure. When obtaining excavation bids, this overexcavation necessity should be clear to excavators so that problems, contractual or otherwise, are less likely to occur later. During the construction phase, the amount of excavation of overly soft clay will necessitate a high degree of judgment. It is possible that full time observation by a soils engineer will be required. Based upon the fact that the excavation will be below water level, water will enter and accumulate in the excavation. This water should be controlled, such as by sumping or other means, so that the bottom of the excavation can be viewed and so that water does not interfere with compaction efforts in the lowest levels. It should again be emphasized, however, that the estimated depths of excavation of unsuitable soil given above are preliminary estimates based upon random but somewhat targeted auger tests. These should be considered preliminary estimates only, to be verified by actual excavations. In fact, for construction quantity purposes, a small amount of additional estimated excavation depth should be added to that given in the logs to conservatively allow for variations and for inadvertent over -excavations which are impossible to avoid when power machinery is employed for the purpose. It is especially cautioned that there could be areas of unsuitable soil not represented by the boring and probe to date. These zones could be grubbed out tree stump pits, an old basement, trash pits, borrow pits, test excavations, utility trenches, etc. Excavators should be especially aware of this possibility. Excavated organic material, uncontrolled fill, wet unstable soil or other soil contaminated with topsoil, vegetation, etc, should be disposed of offsite, or in landscaping areas, where the bearing of weight will not be required. There appears to be no opportunity to salvage excavated mineral soil for re -use as controlled fill as said excavated soil, even if mineral soil, will be cohesive, overmoist and difficult to work with. The excavation contractor will likely import a granular fill. Refer to subsequent sections for more detailed and specific recommendations for site correction recommendations for each structural component. 3. Foundations: For purposes of proposed construction, foundations and fill to support foundations must rest upon and over mineral (non-organic) soils of adequate bearing value. For the proposed construction, a bearing capacity of 2000 pounds per square foot (psf) is typically targeted. However, most single family residences actually bear much less, even under maximum snow load. This analysis of soil for foundation purposes is based upon the location, design configuration and grade indicated above. If there is any significant deviation from assumptions indicated herein, then these recommendations may have to be reconsidered. The site should be prepared as outlined in #2 above, removing unsuitable soil, including the overly soft clay that exists over the building pad area, performing any further excavation as necessary, controlling water that may enter the excavation and placing controlled fill (minimum 2') as needed. This being done, perimeter and interior footings may be generally designed allowing 2000 psf foundation bearing capacity (likely resulting in ordinary spread or pad footings). This value is recommended on the basis of the fact that the footing areas will rest directly upon fill that has been compacted to the level specified in #5 below. This W of 2061 W 65' St, Chanhassen, Minn -6- takes into account shear failure potential near footing levels and the nature of deeper soil regarding settlement. Fill, as required, should be placed, compacted, and tested as per the "Fill Placement" (#5) section following. The above should provide a factor of safety against foundation failure of approximately 3. Over-all and differential settlements should be less than '/Z" and '/,", respectively. If footing conditions change from what has been assumed herein, further study and analysis would be necessary. If the site is graded to different levels than assumed above, if the type of building proposed change, or if soils of a significantly different nature are discovered during excavations, the Soils Engineer should be contacted for re -analysis and possibly revised recommendations. It is not recommended to place footings upon or over organic soil or any other unsuitable soil or to deviate from recommendations contained herein as excessive differential settlement of the structure could result. 4. Slabs: Slabs and fill to support slabs should also rest upon and over mineral soil of adequate density to resist settlement. Based upon boring evidence, base mineral soils on the site, with uncontrolled fill, organic soil, vegetation and any other encountered unsuitable soil removed and with controlled fill placed thereon as necessary are adequate for slab support. It is not recommended to abate site preparation below slabs in any manner. Slabs should have clearance from maximum anticipated aquifer groundwater level and should be protected from intrusion by surface waters. As indicated above, floor level of this structure should be set in accordance with City requirements, utilizing the level of groundwater found as a maximum level. Good site drainage, both at the time of construction and for the life of the structure, is recommended. 5. Fill Placement: Fill material, as required, should be mineral soil, free of debris, boulders and organic material, of such suitable moisture content that it can be readily compacted to specified levels. Fill should be placed and compacted in a manner that will allow complete compaction of the total fill layer to 95% of Standard Maximum Density according to ASTM D 698. Frozen material should not be used in fill construction, nor should any part of the completed fill be allowed to freeze. A soil compaction test should be conducted for every two feet of fill in appropriate segments of the area. If crushed rock or any other very coarse granular soil or aggregate (>30% 3/4" or coarser) is used, the above Standard Maximum Density would not be applicable. In this case, the fill should be compacted to 60% of Maxim Index Density according to ASTM D 4253. Top of fill should extend at least one foot horizontally beyond the structure pad or footing limits. The fill surface may then extend downward and outward on a 1:1 slope to competent soil. It is upon this basis that required oversizing should be computed. W of 2061 W 65' St, Chanhassen, Minn -7- 6. Inspection and Testi: The Client should retain a geotechnical engineering firm to inspect excavations, make field judgments as to subsoil adequacy, and to carry out a program of field and laboratory testing of engineered fill and possibly other materials. This fret should bear full responsibility for knowledge of contents of this report and for proper interpretation and correlation of data, and be prepared to make any further analysis as necessary. Again, this is especially necessary in this case due to the high degree of judgment necessary regarding first encountered clay soils. 7. Final Site Tonoeraphv: Final soil surfaces should be graded to provide adequate drainage from structures and hard surfaces so that as little water as possible infiltrates into soils adjacent to the structure. LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, has prepared this report using an ordinary level of care and in accordance with generally accepted foundation and soil engineering practices. Because the boring, probe and tests represent only a small portion of the total site and for other reasons, Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, does not warrant that the boring, probe and tests are necessarily representative of the entire site but only of the boring, probe and test locations at the time of investigation. No warranty of the site is made or implied. The scope of this report is limited strictly to geotechnical issues which include establishment of soil profile and only those conclusions expressly made. Please note that this work is not intended to document the presence or absence of any environmental contaminants at the site, nor for identifying applicable local, state or federal laws or regulations of a non -geotechnical nature which may or may not be applicable to this site. Further, Interstate Geotechnical Engineering, Inc, cannot be held responsible for facts not disclosed. The bore holes have backfilled the as well as possible using native cuttings. While the deeper Boring 1 did not produce an Environmental Bore Hole as defined by Minnesota Department of Health regulations, Bentonite was added to the cuttings during the backfilling process. However, some continuing settlement may occur if construction does not take place in the near future. If settlement does occur, the Client should backfill with additional soil. This report and all supporting information is famished only to the Client and his assigns for the designated purpose. No representations to other parties or for other uses are made. Soil samples retrieved during the investigation process were classified in the field by a Soils Engineer. Most of them were immediately discarded. Samples returned to the laboratory will be held for a period of 30 days unless a request is received to retain them for a longer period. W of 2061 W 65h St, Chanhassen, Minn -8- ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. INTERSTATE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, Inc Patrick J Hines, PE, President v`pANBFa Fs �.e, Date Registration No. 12086 ., 12086 Proofed by: SCo 9 STATE ?y n�4 aL. of yS�O N A:- METHOD OF INVESTIGATION AUGER BORINGS The Auger Boring procedure is one of the simplest methods of soil :n- vestigation and sampling. Its limitations are that recovered samples are disturbed samples, and that depth of possible investigation is limited by various factors. Depending upon skill of the operator or crew chief, various engineering properties of soil, such as soil profile, estimated inplace strength, etc, may be determined by this method. It may also be used to retrieve samples for laboratory testing and determination of suitability of soil for other purposes.This describes the most often procedures used. In this procedure, augers are advanced into the ground by hydraulic/ mechanical means. At intervals, usually 5', the auger withdrawn and soil samples are retrieved and classified, retaining samples as necessary for further analysis. Record data includes depth to changes in strata, descrip- tion of soil in each major stratum, groundwater depth or elevation where found, and other information. This is in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Designation: D 1452-80, "Standard Practice for Soil Investigation and Sampling by auger Borings". Sometimes, hand auger borings of various types are used to accomplish the same purpose. However, penetration depth is usually limited. Its advan- tage is greater accuracy and the fact that a hand auger boring may be the only type possible where access is limited for power auger machinery. (over) GROUNDWATER To check for groundwater, the boring is usually probed for the presence of water (1) inside the hollow -stem auger, prior to auger withdrawal, (2) in the bore hole, immediately after auger withdrawal, and (3) again in the bore hole after a sufficient amount for groundwater to accumulate and stabilize therein. It is emphasized that indicated results are for the time and condi- tions of testing only. Groundwater can fluctuate as a function of many variables. SOIL CLASSIFICATION Recovered soil samples are usually first classified by the drilling crew chief in the field and then verified by the Soils Engineer short- ly thereafter. Selected soil samples may be subject to a program of laboratory tests. Unless otherwise indicated, the soil classification system used is ASTM Designation: D 2488-84, "Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure). This is also known as the Unified Soil Classification System. Other soil classification systems may be used, such as AASHTO, USDA, Mn/DOT, etc. If an alternate system is used, it will be noted and described noted in the main body of the report. Attachment to Engineering Keport Interstate cieotechmcal Engineering, Inc METHOD OF IN V EJ I IUA I ION Dynamic Cone Penetrometer the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DUP) procedure is an increasingly accepted method to investigate soil in limited zones, to augment existing testing, or to test in relatively isolated or inaccessible areas. It is a relatively lightweight device that evaluates soil consistency and density. It is "dynamic", versus static, in that it utilizes a talltng weight in the testing. The device utilizes a 15# steel ring weight falling 20" on an E -rod slide (see sketch below). At the end of the E -rod assembly is a specially shaped cone that is driven into the soil by repeated drops of the hammer on the anvil. The cone is slightly enlarged at its base to minimize shaft resistance above. The test is either made at existing surface level, but most likely through an augered hole (see separate "Auger Borings" procedure). Soil profile is established through this latter procedure. At test depth, the cone is seated 2" (the `set") into undisturbed soil for proper embedment. The cone point is then further driven V/," by the 15# hammer dropping 20". The blows to drive the cone 13/4" into the soil are counted and recorded. Sometimes, a second and third penetration can be made in this same set. By successively advancing the bore hole and adding rods, tests can be made at various levels. This procedure may be used to depths of up to 15 or 20 feet. Rod lllout anvil 151E steel ring •eighl inq anvil Sliding Drive Hammer Cone Point I Interstate Geotechnical Engineering. Inc UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION W Dn�m Group Ty *9 I [abonlory dxsirsolion aiuria for bo C Well -grades gravels, gravd-und Cu. D=archer Nan 6:Cti.ID_I' bnv.. I and l GW mixtures, tinle or rw fines _ _ D.• D.aD_ — — a - L_ GP Poorly graded gravels. gravel- _ Not meeting all yndauon raquirmfenu for GW sand minurn. Suk or m, fines 3 - " r e . GM d Silty gnveis. gnvd-sand-sill Anerberg limns Orin. "A" a 9 ` ? Mixtures= ::: w line or P. I. less than a Above "A" line vith P.I. u it WIvIve t a and ' arc hw- Z derfine seta requinng use Davey gravels. gravel-sanddnv - _ " _ Alserberg limits above ".A- Of dual ssmcats Y - a mtxtura 5 = liM vnth P.I. greater than Y a �- og T ]'. we• ll -laded sands. graselly Co • D— sees:^ :han a: lr • ID_' Sr.�r.. I and 1 ? = c SW sands. link w as fines = D . D AD- S 'v_ w c pY - = SP Poorly Railed sands• gra.dlY c - .. Not meeting all gradation reouiremms for SW 3 _ Sands, little w no fines o c - Z o �- i = c - e i C - j(d I d Sol• sandt. sand -silt y - An R'9erg limits below "A" limns ploning in hatched a mta ores " _:_ line or P.I. less than a zone with P.I. betv.mr, a . u a ? 7 _ v - and' ue hordrrlme ns es L e ? rryumng use of dual sym- _ SC Oavq sand,, sand<lay mtz- O Ane:berg limns abcve "A" I Pols IV:cs - •, X X IIM lth P.I. gr41'tC :han' lnof97w alis and —R Inc NL sandt. rock hour. sill' or lash 60 fine sands or .layer nita •ath , i--- Fm cwuficatmn or fre.Snmed slight plastidty ^ ~ swls and .•me fraarwe or coarse irwreynic elan of for w me- "'g9Mea e W:b. 30 — -� dium plasticity, gra.<lly clays. auerb,ra Lunn" 011W: ll m , — CL hatched am ue Isnrdrrnre eau w 1 — 7 — sandye'iK. slit, Clava. Ica/1 , dPUJnf renunna uu OI Coal t c S days sy..Is.40 I - Eemron of A-Imr. G PI.O-?-LL -YIs s OrganK stN.s and wgame sill, I i Z- - OL dart of los. plasttaty I c 30 = - _ { Inorganic ohs. msocm or - nH ,ro sinl r MH dlasomaavus GM sandv or a 20 I i = ndv sods. elastic ,its _ e - iL _- c' - - CH IriorganK clan of high plan. to 7 pp rt - y naty. rat 13,3 E A 0 10 :0 70 aU W 60 "0 Ito 90 IU. OH I OrgwK eta" of medium :0 _ 7 high ptaulaiy, wgww lilts a ... r j R I Pear asst wha h'01v �ganK L Nud L nn a — a wilt P'_....,i. �. n t 0 Probe lA Elev = 9 --33 Uh Boring No 1 Elev = 98.1 W 66th Street BENCH MARK Top nut fire hydrant on south side of street, approx on east line extended of "parent" lot; Elev = 100.00 (a&itrary) LOCATIONS OF Patrick J Hines, PE SOIL BORINGS 8167 100th $t S Cottage Grove. MN 55016 SCALE: 111 = 20' 1 DRAWN BY PH DATE: 24 Oct 2014 Proposed Single 612 414 5770 Family Residence West of 2061 W 66th Street Chanhassen, Minnesota Client: James Rudos Minnetonka, Minn au1L DVf au LVV 8167 100th St S Patrick J Hines, PE Cottage Grove MN 55016 Proposed Single Family Residence PROJECT: West of 2061 W L5th St, Chanhassen, Minn LOG OF BORING NO: 1 DEPTHS SURFACE ELEVATION: 98.1 SAMPLE LAB b OTHER TESTS —)SCP- IN FEET GEOLOGY NWB DESCRIFT]ON AND CLASSIFICATION I if TYPe R I W DE. L L P.L. set _�ue LEAN CLAY, variably sandy, Organic (OL I Topsoil N 1 HA Black, w/ tr's mineral Soil, Fill 1 very moist, loose to firm I !I Fill (elev 96 ±)2 HA LE9N CLAY, somewhat sandy, Pred Dark Gray (CL) 2f w/ a little Organic Soil, w/ tr gr j moist to ve moist, loose to firm 3 •LEAN CLAY, rather silty, Organic (OL) Buried 3 HA Black, w/ small roots, tr's undecom- Humus 4 posed vegetation, saturated, rather borderline Sapric Peat in soft 1 5-}>`pper portion sl lighter, less organic, w/ depth 5.75 j 6 1 Lacustrine Deposit Y 4 HA 41.9 j LEAN CL Y, a itt a san y, ery Darkto Dark Gray (CL), soft to soft (w/ very 772 depth) fine 71' ,orly gra a pre gr, w Glacial Y 5 HA 8/13 i med, tpo cs), w/ a few fines, Dark Gray Till, w/ j saturated, loose to firm I Outwashl Y 6 FA 25.6 j I(SP), banded w/ LEAN CLAY, a little sandy, inclusion j 9� Dark Gray (CL), saturated, rather soft soft to medium @ 8P+ i 10 more bands of clay, less of sand, w/ I j depth 11 Glacial N 7 FA i LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray 12 (CL), w/ a little gravel Till j saturated, medium 131 i 14-i 15 � N 8 FA I 16- 6=1718-19 1 17- 18- 19- 20- 20 i 21 I I tta �eathe0. d ISW 45 mph± Breezi ,asti Clear , Czar) 70°F+, j (con in don next-sheet-) WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS DRILLING DATA Cly' i TiM� SAMPLED USING UVE�IN I OAILLING wA'E+� DETM DEPTH DETM .MUD LEVE LEVEL j� 23 Oct f 16:29 7j' None 3.8' 1 Method: 3" Hand & 4" Power Flight* Augers *Mobile B-31 Drill li Rig on Dodge Power Wagon, 24 Oct I 13:51 5' 1,8' j " 14:35 to 23' 6}' 3}' Co®enced: 23 October Boring CO�aleted: 24 October 2014 " " ' 15:20 5}' 2.1' Patrl_e�k 3 H1....y PR Pro PROJECT: west DEPTH IN FEET 2 25 BOIL BORING LOG (continued) e 816; 100th St S Cottages r+nvp MN 45016' LOG OF BORING NO: 1 SURFACE ELEVATION: 98.1 SAMPLE LAB 8 OTHER TESTS GEOLOGY N WSLL DESCRIPTION ANDCLASSIFICATION N TYPE A W DE P;L; LEAN CLAY, rather sandy, Dark Gray (CL Glacial N 9 I FA w/ tr to a little gravel Till saturated, medium End of Boring - No Refusal re hole void backfilled w/ native ttings mixed w/ Bentonite on 24 tober 2014 27 Probe 1A - Elev = 97.8 280-6}' Topsoil Fill, Fill (Sl less 29 than Boring 1), Buried Humus 6}'-7' Lean Clay, possibly Marl, 30 Gray, saturated, very soft 7'-8}' Lean Clay, rather silty, Dark 31 Gray, saturated, very soft to soft 8}'-10}' Lean Clay. w/ band inclusions, 32 Dark Gray, saturated, soft to medium 33 Probe put down by power flight auger J method on 24 October 2014 & ummed- 34 ately backfilled w/ native cuttings mixed w/ Bentonite 35 361 37 3 39 41 431 I 441 45� 461 i 0 Patrick J Hines, PE PROJECT: __—BORIHC LOG >Fx LOG OF BORING DEF7H SUAFACE ELEVATION: IN FEET I/ DESCRIF'TIONANDCLASS:FICATION li 'I i Soil ClasEificatian, using visual -manual ardlcr '-abcra- tory methods, accrcding to the ,:.ified Soil C1aeEification System, or to otl,cr system as sp;r:•pri-ate 8167 LOOt" St Cottage Grove MN 55016 NO: GEOLOGY N ,KI SAMPLE '6 �y — TYPE I I -T I 1 origin cf Soi1 LAB i OTHER TESTS W D E e L' — Fcnetratiou "1`" ' i Value - NuTber of blows to drive Split -Barrel Sam- plerCre foot I { Water Bearing j - les 1s = No i = hater I Z' Le% el S;rbci 1 Srr.71= Nu-.'er -'FNTS I Other Pat'_ as j ` ^.e CCF..r}I Lin I tc'� i i' Tn;'ace �T—.._.� Conte?2 i i LLerFr!• of Samil Recav_.red R,'.L'4S DATA. In'icet=s •;pe it -j { Cf tin:. D_7: ... = R_t3 Auger Tube i I (ti.ir.r•all) -'FNTS I Other Pat'_ as j ` ^.e CCF..r}I Lin I tc'� i i' Tn;'ace �T—.._.� Conte?2 i i LLerFr!• of Samil Recav_.red R,'.L'4S DATA. AI-Jaff, Sharmeen From: Chris Jerdee [cjerdee7@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 11:26 AM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Cc: Chris Jerdee Subject: proposed lot split and site development on W. 65th Street in Chanhassen Hello Sharmeen, My name is Chris Jerdee and I live at 2081 W. 65th Street in Chanhassen. I think I spoke to you a couple of weeks ago on the phone about the lot next to mine and a proposed splitting of the lot. The property was recently sold to gentlemen who is "flipping" the property and it's come to my understanding that he plans to split the lot into two parcels. The purpose of my letter is twofold. First, I want to inform you and/or whoever else might be working on this particular project that the lot in question has a pretty significant water problem. I'm surprised it was ever built on in the first place because the lot literally becomes a duck pond every spring when the snow melts and then again every time we get any significant rainfall. It will get standing water more than ankle deep on both the western edge of the lot bordering mine and also on the south side of the lot. As I understand it there are springs underneath the ground and the water table is very high. This is coupled with the fact that the street is higher than the lot so the water has nowhere to drain. I tried to remedy this on my property by having a landscaping contractor install drain tile that ties into the catch basin in the culdesac. Unfortunately the lot in question next to me has an even larger drainage problem so it still impacts my property. Second, and more importantly, I want to be sure that if the lot is indeed approved to split and a new home is built that the proper steps are taken to ensure that any watershed does not impact my lot further. If any grading is done to build a new structure I want to be sure that it is not done in such a way that simply moves the water problem from that lot on to mine. Hopefully whoever buys the property does their due diligence and has a percolation test done because if not I think they might end up being surprised. Thanks in advance for your consideration regarding this matter. If you or anyone has any questions I can be reached at 612-385-1329. Chris Jerdee C17YOFCHANHASSEN RECEIVED SEP 2 R ?014 CHANHASSEN PLANNING Dep) SCANNED A A I r, i 'IT / /- / / / / ✓( / \/ \ -f L / L T LID O 00 lqtN 0 N O V) 1, s West 65th Street I i I i S87029'21"E 195.00 FIELD CREW NO. I BY I DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF CL INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT DRAWN BY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT RLS SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY CHECKED BY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE RLS USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING DATE FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. 0 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this_2rr6�of September, 2014. Rory L. SynsteNl- Minnesota License No. 44565 rory@sathre.com 11 L /l T suRtF 2 p N co 0 N CryFR s ? 0,� ? SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 3, Block 2, MOLINE'S ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County Minnesota. Parcel 1 The west 97.50 feet of Lot 3, Block 2, MOLINE'S ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County Minnesota. together with easements for drainage and utility purposes over under and across the northerly 10.00 feet; the southerly 10.00 feet; the easterly 5.00 feet; and the westerly 5.00 feet. Parcel l That part of Lot 3, Block 2, MOLINE'S ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County Minnesota Which Lies east of the west 97.50 feet. together with easements for drainage and utility purposes over under and across the northerly 10.00 feet; the southerly 10.00 feet; the easterly 5.00 feet; and the westerly 5.00 feet. GENERAL NOTES 1) This Survey was performed without the benefit of a title commitment. There may be easements encumbering the subject property of which we are unaware. 2) Site Address: 2061 W 65th St, Excelsior, MN 3) Flood Zone Information: This property is contained in Zone C (area of minimal flooding) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 270051 0005 B, effective date of July 2, 1979. 4) Existing Parcel Area Information 4)1) Parcel Area Information: The Gross land area is 30,324+/- square feet or 0.696 +/- acres. 4)2) Hard Cover: House - 1,520+/- square feet, Driveway 1,833+/- square feet, Concrete - 76+/- square feet, Deck 254+/- square feet, Total - 3,683+/- square feet 4)3) Hard Cover Ratio = 12 percent 5) Proposed Parcel Area Information 5)1) Parcel 1 Area =15,165 5)1)1) Hard Cover: None 5)1)2) Hard Cover Ratio = 0 5)2) Parcel 2 Area =15,159 5)2)1) Hard Cover: House - 1,520+/- square feet, Driveway 1,833+/- square feet, Concrete - 76+/- square fee, Deck 254+/- square feet, Total - 3,683+/- square feet 5)2)2) Hard Cover Ratio = 24 Percent 6) Site Elevation: Elevations are based on the Top Nut Hydrant located at the Northeast comer of the subject property having an elevation of 1062.1 (NAVD 1988). Plesse note that contours shown outside of a 20 foot buffer of the subject property were obtained from MnDNR LiDAR mapping. 7) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is RSF - Single Family Residential District per the City of Chanhassen's zoning map dated January 14, 2014. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation were obtained from Sec. 20-615. Lot requirements and setbacks of the Zoning Ordinance found on their web site on the date of August 25, 2014 and are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet , Side: 10 feet, Rear: 30 feet, Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet, Rear: 10 feet Lot Requirements - Lot Area: 15,000; Frontage: 90; Depth: 125 Hard Cover -A Percent 25 Please note that the general restrictions for the subject property may have been amended through a city process. We could be unaware of such amendments if they are not in a recorded document provided to us. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. 8) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources: plans obtained from utility companies, plans provided by client, markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources. We have used this information to develop a view of the underground utilities for this site. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. A Gopher State One Call was submitted for this survey. Please reference Ticket No. 140570459 for a list of utility operators in this area. O CAST IRON MONUMENT ® gZSR, \,P• 4 FLARED END SECTION D4 GATE VALVE W. 65m R z . �rCJ lyr W 23i GUY WIRE V HYDRANT O v ST EW CRE TVIEW.LI. �� Cm, r H 9 CIR. E LIKY LME LUCY I C G SURVEY CONTROL POINT i j R0. JQST U. INS �R. �. 00" D4 � LIGHT POLE N POWER POLE IS HIGH GATE CT Q SANITARY CLEANOUT N SIGN FLIER .Z GROUND ELEVATION I STORM DRAIN Q y CIR. LAKE \.� CT w y CJ T O Y i u'1 o RUSK e 4ZQ13 C T`_ ym A j A. cs ..P'a LA. � A L e P E O CAST IRON MONUMENT ® CATCH BASIN 4 FLARED END SECTION D4 GATE VALVE < GUY WIRE 1Di HYDRANT O SURVEY MONUMENT SET SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND G SURVEY CONTROL POINT 0 LIGHT POLE r0.> POWER POLE IS SANITARY MANHOLE Q SANITARY CLEANOUT � SIGN ,W25 GROUND ELEVATION ® STORM DRAIN STORM MANHOLE CJ YARD LIGHT TWP.116 - RGE.23 - SEC.O: CARVER COUNTY BOOK XXX/PAGE XXX Chanhassen MINNESOTA Beann9 are tom the Carver CwnyC final System (NAD W - 1986 MI.) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SURVEY LEGEND O A/C UNIT © CABLE TV PEDESTAL D ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER OE ELECTRIC MANHOLE © ELECTRIC METER © GAS METER © GAS VALVE GUARD RAIL 0 HAND HOLE SOIL BORING TREE CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS O TELEPHONE MANHOLE O TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0 UTILITY MANHOLE I] UTILITY PEDESTAL 0 WELL BITUMINOUS cTv CABLE TV CONCRETE CURB 0 CONCRETE —sso_ CONTOUR EXISTING sso CONTOUR PROPOSED DT DRAIN TILE ELc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND —X—X— FENCE TO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND GAS- GAS UNDERGROUND or(u OVERHEAD UTILITY ,+ RAILROAD TRACKS > SANITARY SEWER » STORM SEWER TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND uTL UTILITY UNDERGROUND I WATERMAIN FILE NO. Lot Split Exhibit 42425-001 For zi 2061 West 65th Street i I I \ \ r♦ / i i� I / -- --- __ \ \ \ f< t L/ L_11 T -- -- --TEND P / / West 65th SIKH '\J—'—'�'� > —F_ > > Sanitary Sewer Per City Record Drawings ro i Rin=1961.2 / �> > > >—>->-> Street I , mr<1D4s.e / I > > > > �` Sanitary Service Per City — I >�> > > > I / Record Drawings 948+/— - I > ut --- Z I Inv o _ _ — IIN L 1.m 1044 I V V nv.1044.5 I I a e"noin Per City Reeard Drawings � -- — — — — � FO- N87031 o I I \ T- N87°31'14"W 195.00 FD -7 ' I --� W EN � r END OP FO \ \ ELL E C C ELE �— \ ° Lot 3 INHO61 \ \ E zI L I \ � \ �- ------ ------ --- O l I _ \ 1.0 LJO \ \ I tri \ ( _ Septic Mound ) � N /GFE \ 061.1 o ' N 1 .5 - 14.6 - Two Story House 4' \ V9 Actress; .61 West 65th Street 106L Chhanhassen. MN 1061.4 O / \ / Budding Foundation Area: 1520 Sq. EL z \ \ House \ \ / 3 .8 \ V A 15.6 \ \ \ \ \ V Deck I BLOCK 2 I \ \ \ \ \ 1P Fffi1 --OPEN \ \ x \ No Ia oPIN � • FN9iP 923s \ I r, =EN S-8Z29'217E 195.00 ----� \ V A A *-N, IP OPEN \ \ FIELD CREW NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF CL INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT DRAWN BY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT RLS SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. CHECKED BY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE RLS USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING DATE FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated thie�ay of September, 2014. Rory Minnesota License No. 44565 RS suR`�� W w SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. m T y 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 P�P�24:1Q" DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 3, Block 2, MOLINE'S ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County Minnesota. GENERAL NOTES 1) This Survey was performed without the benefit of a title commitment. There may be easements encumbering the subject property of which we are unaware. 2) Site Address: 2061 W 65th St, Excelsior, MN 3) Flood Zone Information: This property is contained in Zone C (area of minimal flooding) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 270051 0005 B, effective date of July 2, 1979. 4) Parcel Area Information: The Gross land area is 30,324+/- square feet or 0.696 +/- acres. 5) Hard Cover: House - 1,520+/- square feet, Driveway 1,833+/- square feet, Concrete - 76+/- square feet, Deck 254+/- square feet, Total - 3,683+/- square feet 6) Hard Cover Ratio = 12 percent 7) Site Elevation: Elevations are based on the Top Nut Hydrant located at the Northeast comer of the subject property having an elevation of 1062.1 (NAVD 1988). Please note that contours shown outside of a 20 foot buffer of the subject property were obtained from MnDNR LiDAR mapping. 8) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is RSF - Single Family Residential District per the City of Chanhassen's zoning map dated January 14, 2014. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation were obtained from Sec. 20-615. Lot requirements and setbacks of the Zoning Ordinance found on their web site on the date of August 25, 2014 and are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet , Side: 10 feet, Rear: 30 feet, Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet, Rear: 10 feet Lot Requirements - Lot Area: 15,000; Frontage: 90; Depth: 125 Hard Cover - 30 Percent Please note that the general restrictions for the subject property may have been amended through a city process. We could be unaware of such amendments if they are not in a recorded document provided to us. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. 9) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources: plans obtained from utility companies, plans provided by client, markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources. We have used this information to develop a view of the underground utilities for this site. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. A Gopher State One Call was submitted for this survey. Please reference Ticket No. 140570459 for a list of utility operators in this area. OO CASTIRON MONUMENT ® CATCH BASIN 4 FLARED END SECTION DQ GATE VALVE < GUY WIRE 'Cf HYDRANT O SURVEY MONUMENT SET • SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND Q SURVEY CONTROL POINT C LIGHT POLE c0t, POWER POLE QS SANITARY MANHOLE Q SANITARY CLEANOUT SIGN ,972.5 GROUND ELEVATION ® STORM DRAIN © STORM MANHOLE YARD LIGHT TWPA 16 - RGE.23 - SEC.03 CARVER COUNTY BOOK XXX/PAGE XXX Chanhassen MINNESOTA NORSX" Bearings are based on the Carver CountyCoordHate System (NAD 83 - 1986 AT) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SURVEY LEGEND CAJ A/C UNIT © CABLE TV PEDESTAL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER © ELECTRIC MANHOLE 0 ELECTRIC METER © GAS METER OG GAS VALVE GUARD RAIL H HAND HOLE SOIL BORING TREE CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS 8 TELEPHONE MANHOLE III TELEPHONE PEDESTAL o� TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0 UTILITY MANHOLE O UTILITY PEDESTAL 0 WELL SCALE IN FEET !-� BITUMINOUS CTv CABLE TV CONCRETE CURB 0 CONCRETE W. 66My 96o CONTOUR PROPOSED DT DRAIN TILE ELc ST 23. a \/ DUC1.4,e 4e u eo V GAI GAS UNDERGROUND EW o SITE/Tf J6 TVIEIN (4tfm r 4 a „�, I SANITARY SEWER >- i ,CRE LIP. yrtR. LAKE LUCr RD. C WATERMAIN �.S 9R, t 't' w HIGH KATE CT z paF*,t `. V T. d I N N 5 o t TEttER VH - O cm LAKE c \.� CT y T S tia 3 i To (a RUBY ? ( ZQjy `_ Y A cmc T\` RD M S� RA L /,T(Y,` LA. M . V sP'd DRY A P L E o a J o v Lake Lucy OO CASTIRON MONUMENT ® CATCH BASIN 4 FLARED END SECTION DQ GATE VALVE < GUY WIRE 'Cf HYDRANT O SURVEY MONUMENT SET • SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND Q SURVEY CONTROL POINT C LIGHT POLE c0t, POWER POLE QS SANITARY MANHOLE Q SANITARY CLEANOUT SIGN ,972.5 GROUND ELEVATION ® STORM DRAIN © STORM MANHOLE YARD LIGHT TWPA 16 - RGE.23 - SEC.03 CARVER COUNTY BOOK XXX/PAGE XXX Chanhassen MINNESOTA NORSX" Bearings are based on the Carver CountyCoordHate System (NAD 83 - 1986 AT) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SURVEY LEGEND CAJ A/C UNIT © CABLE TV PEDESTAL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER © ELECTRIC MANHOLE 0 ELECTRIC METER © GAS METER OG GAS VALVE GUARD RAIL H HAND HOLE SOIL BORING TREE CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS 8 TELEPHONE MANHOLE III TELEPHONE PEDESTAL o� TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0 UTILITY MANHOLE O UTILITY PEDESTAL 0 WELL SCALE IN FEET !-� BITUMINOUS CTv CABLE TV CONCRETE CURB 0 CONCRETE CONTOUR EXISTING 96o CONTOUR PROPOSED DT DRAIN TILE ELc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND —x—x— FENCE FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND GAI GAS UNDERGROUND 0I OVERHEAD UTILITY ##t+Ml♦+I+HH-Hi+ RAILROAD TRACKS > SANITARY SEWER >- STORM SEWER TEL— TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND uTL UTILITY UNDERGROUND WATERMAIN Existing Conditions Survey For 2061 West 65th Street FILE NO. 42425-001 1 i SCANNED 1 GRADING &EROSION CONTROL PLAN /l T / r iC r RD 1P Sanitary West 65th SMN >�_� > y Sewer Per City Record Drawings Street o Rim=1061.2 / 1 > > > / jn=1049.E 16" COREDRILL > > Sanitary Service Per City >�-> / / INVA 056.0 > > Record Drawings "1°59' = 946+/- °506 y °506 `\ 9 5 Oyg9 I \ a ermain Per a ` \ City Record Drowin s �- / /° I oy°1.• I I �� I I REMOVE I I I FO �$ \ / 1 TREE I pii 10��. 1 J- -� x F ` f0 O ELE FO F-` " X " "1 " g FRO IP OPENS ELE 1 % - \ l 6" D.T 01 -00 _-.C:J 1 _ 0 9.7 -- g 2 s 1 \- \\ INV: 1056.8r -5 o0 0 LO,t----T-- ----- 059.6 TNH= \\ 1060 00 fo/i5" D.TII�S ♦ I 5 X59$ 059' . ;:..,;^ .`_,` 10h9 x1Oy9 5 XyA6oO ) I --NY: 10 3 *e° \ 1 -- - lastic Clio O6D.1 \\ - . \ --- ----m ---- 97.5d ----'-° --- �TG �0C 17--- - I - -- - 0 h�.1. 9%501.' ---------- 16• \ r X � I --tefia - 1 1059 I 5� 0 N �X ° 5` ,°b9$---x1O�9� I\\ x o60o I I Plastic CB1 =_I I � \ c ; T>s: 1059.2 X059 X, BLDG PAD Parcel I 1 1 -- I 0 Parcell INV: 10571 I 11 77.5'x60' 109 X 59� GF 1063.0 1 6 x` °h i �� x`° septic nd ;-� o \ �I TF 1063.3 i 6 F / o 1060 I 1 aE= m r-\ 1 I � ILML1 14-61- T.. 4.61 - I 4. I 1 - I•O H Two Story H65th Street ry I I I L I °CC Actress: 2061 West FFE= ChanhPlastic CB2 1 ..,I~ I 1 .0 1 xo6 BuNd'n Foundation Area IAN X1.4 / \ TC: 1060.2 I / - _ _-_ _ _ j �2EMOVE 2. s4. Fe. \ INV: 1057.7 IA -,f (1062.5)-' \ 6 I (SEPTIC I \ 1L4- - /06'/ ` I 'SYSTEM n I I House 51 _ r��,,I I I \ \ �° I SO �� i.6 �0 �7Aj Pllast�a5 a .6 s.ol L - 1°6, / c� x -01)? f6' Tt10®��69C0.4 X06 I 1- \ \ -Plastic C I J S \ \� 2• O O _J1 I f V: 1 UJ8.4 x i Deck /I \ I L!` 0% 1 7 I I \ Tc: 1060.0 ,/ \ y d�, ?.0%> >o I I T VI \ -oi L ^BL�� 2 \ \ \ I IVY `1058.10 14.0.91 0.7 •V for \ 1 4 I '\` Y - - \ 0 i Im \ 9 I 5 I --Pj ;ed Drainage or Utility! EOSements 1- \ \ \ X�j -� -- - - i X-�°6` - =-°6O 11 x 1O6°- - - - _X6°- 5 shed Ftlp_W FID O I \ - ° - 97.5 IP OPEN g RD 1"2M F%0 IP OPEN \ \\ \ \\\\ X1\\ x °6Y \ \, X1o6rL. -_ *1RD IP OPEN 0 \066. 7068 \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ RAWING NAME NO. I BY BASE West... DRAWN BY NRH CHECKED BY RSM DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF -THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Nathan R. Date: o Lic. No. L(7 19 Z O0 -SRS st R`11 0 = A W N mic+c�FRS A7 EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS: MN TOLL FREE (800 252-1166 TWIN CITIES (651)454-0002 CONSTRUCTION NOTES INSTALL SILT FENCE, AND/OR TREE PRESERVATION FENCING AT GRADING LIMITS, AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY, WATERSHED, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. INSTALL ROCK ENTRANCE BERM REMOVE NECESSARY TREES AND SEPTIC SYSTEM VERIFY SEWER SERVICE INVERTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION DUE TO EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY, 1.0% GRADES ARE PROPOSED TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE 1" COPPER WITH CURB BOX TAPPED INTO EXISTING MAIN REMOVE ONLY NECESSARY STREET TO INSTALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND RESTORE STREET TO MATCH EXISTING STREET SECTION. INSTALL SADDLE TO CONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO MAIN. THE SEWER SERVICE SHALL BE 4" SDR 26 AT A MINIMUM OF 2% GRADE UP TO THE PROPERTY LINE. PLUMBING CODE MUST BE FOLLOWED WHEN SEWER SERVICE IS EXTENDED FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE HOUSE. llii,5 DETAIL PLATES SHALL GOVERN CITY PROJECT NO. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952)476-6000 CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NO R1 Bead,ge are based on One Carver CountyCoo,dinate System (NAD 63 - 1966 adj.) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SYMBOL LEGEND LOT LINE BUILDING SETBACK BOUNDARY PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS RIGHT-OF-WAY EX STORM SEWER PIPE - -- STORM SEWER PIPE EX STORM STRUCTURE Wi 0 <11 STORM STRUCTURE 0 STORM STRUCTURE LABEL EX SANITARY SEWER PIPE SANITARY SEWER PIPE EX. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE QS EX WATERMAIN WATERMAIN HYDRANT GATE VALVE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SWALE EOF PRE CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE POST CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE WOODFIBER BLANKET DITCH CHECKS UTILITY POLE C-C)� DEVELOPER \ JAMES BRUDOS 2061 West 65th Street Chanhassen, MN. 55317 Contact: James Brudos Tel: 612.850.4949 Email: jmbmdoscompany@gmail.com ENGINEER/LAND SURVEYOR SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 S. Broadway Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 Engineer: Nate Herman Land Surveyor: Rory Synstelien Tel: 952476-6000 Fax: 952-476-0104 Email: nherman@sathre.com rory@sathre.com Zoning: RSF Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet, Rear: 30 feet, Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet, Rear: 10 feet Lot Requirements - Lot Area: 15,000; Frontage: 90; Depth: 125 Hard Cover - 30 Percent "PRELIMINARY" GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 2061 WEST 65TH STREET JAMES BRUDOS FILE NO. 42425-001 1 SCANNED DRAWING NAME BASE West... DRAWN BY NRH CHECKED BY RSM DATE i I I I I I I I I I I I SMH > > > ^98 16" COREDRILL INVA056.0 I a I I _ I A o b II UTILITY PLAN REMOVE & REPLACE STREET & CURB IN KIND 70 SY Sanitary Sewer Per City Record Drawings West 65th Street Sanitary Service Per City _ Record Drawings Inv = 948+/- to lain Per City Record Drawings I I CBOX: 1059.5 O I ♦ 97.$� FO FO - oil D - I ` 'F�� 13 ELE 24 o ELE " FND IP I I I I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I S END IP OPEN I - - - - _ _ _ _ IamINSTALL NEW I s - 4 I I'0 Fa WATER CE r- - - - - - � - - "`;.UTlk1iE_: X. X9.6 INV: 1056.8 6 xis:. v,�f - - - - - - Tfil 1060 5 1 �� ` Grp FOR PARCELI 1 1 i FO(z PAFZ' EL 2 -i" e / D.TI LE � `�4�TILIZE EX. yyI 5 5 i UTILIZE EX. 15 /p A I NV: 1056.3 S 41u1zARY SERVILE 1 5 i SANITARY SERVICE I FOR�AL2CEL 1 FOR PARCEL 2 �la -------- �� 1 Plastic C04 O6D.1 M o 1 +J 1 5 TC: 105V060.01 6 1059. X 1 51 I Istic 0131 ----- _ - S•0 59.1 1059.2 1059. Itj BLDG PAD arc r - - - 1_ a Parcel 2 1057.2 1 �� 171,, �r 1059 .5 A Ji GF 1063.0 t P1 TF 1063.3 3epffc no J\ 1 ml jo 6. 1060 I IN GFE= m r a �I.I 1 0 o v - moo, 1 5 - 1a.61 - L 1 Adress:T206Story House Street 4 _ I Plastic CB2 + 1 Building Foundot,0 Ars , MIN N520 1061.4 1 - --_---�- - 2. Sq- FE TC: 1060.2 L 1 --------____ INV: 1057.7 �; Il �,�.r/�( A2'D� (1062.5)+� I 5I 1• -- I l.a __--- �- --� rW 1 ry o o � 1_IJ Plastic CB5 3 .e I 061.6 06, I 6' TC0060.4 i s.oi- I _ o_ 1 NV: TU8.4 Deck Plastic C I _� �2.p/ 0-70 -� 1 I I TC: 1060.0 1 �6', y000� 2.0%> 6�0 1 I I 060.4 INV: 1058.0 �IiosD.g io6G.3 o B. i a x NO. I BY I DATE 5 1 Proposed Drainage and Utility; Easements -- 1 L---------15 -r \ \ I - - - - - - - - - - - _J L - - - - - - - - - - - 11 \ 5Shed C 28 I--------r - - FND IP 10623 J FND IP OPEN O ; 97.50 1 , 0 1 • END IP 9235 Q 97.5 IP OPEN O END IP OPEN USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. • END IP OPEN CL Street v EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS: MN TOLL FREE (800 252-1166 TWIN CITIES (651) 454-0002 CONSTRUCTION NOTES INSTALL SILT FENCE, AND/OR TREE PRESERVATION FENCING AT GRADING LIMITS, AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY, WATERSHED, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. INSTALL ROCK ENTRANCE BERM REMOVE NECESSARY TREES AND SEPTIC SYSTEM VERIFY SEWER SERVICE INVERTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION DUE TO EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY, 1.0% GRADES ARE PROPOSED TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE 1" COPPER WITH CURB BOX TAPPED INTO EXISTING MAIN REMOVE ONLY NECESSARY STREET TO INSTALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND RESTORE STREET TO MATCH EXISTING STREET SECTION. INSTALL SADDLE TO CONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO MAIN. THE SEWER SERVICE SHALL BE 4" SDR 26 AT A MINIMUM OF 2% GRADE UP TO THE PROPERTY LINE. PLUMBING CODE MUST BE FOLLOWED WHEN SEWER SERVICE IS EXTENDED FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE HOUSE. CITY DETAIL PLATES SHALL GOVERN Variable 6' Metal fence post denoting curb box. Top 6" painted blue. Curb box with 1 1/4" standpipe and stationary rod Water Service 1" Type •K" Copper � 1"X1" Corporation Cock yP Concrete Block Support Water Main PL NOTES: I. Do not plug end of curb stop. 2. Add 6" crimped pigtail to curb stop. 3. The copper service line between the main and curb box 9. POSTS shall be one continous piece of piping, splices will not be permitted 4. Corporation cock to be 1" x 1" inside diameter. 5. Saddles required on 6" DIP or smaller mains and ail mains 1/8 BEND and all mains 12• or larger. 6. Saddles when required shall be Ford style F202 double strap. 7. Stainless steel saddles required on all PVC watennain. 2"X2" MARKER 1/2 PIPE DIAMETER MIN. SEE NOTE 2. rlwq�y WIlYI�1�, TYPICAL EX STORM SEWER PIPE GRAVITY MAN WATER STORM SEWER PIPE It�Mn�ll SERVICE RmSED: 0-11 9-fi 0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT P' ea. 1005 FlLE N4NE a!FIIG\SPECSIWS MANS FOR DEPTH OF COVER 16 FEET OR LESS. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Nathan R. Herman, P.E. Date: o=,o /- L4 Lic. No. Lf % `l 8 Z SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 CITY PROJECT NO. CHANHASSEN,' MINNESOTA Bearings am based on the Carver CountyCoon inate system (NAD 83 - 1986 ad, I 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SYMBOL LEGEND CL PL VARIABLE FENCE 9. POSTS BUILDING SETBACK BOUNDARY z_ z WYE PLUGGED EN r 1/8 BEND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS 6' PVC SDR -26 PIPE MIN. SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT rn RIGHT-OF-WAY w 2"X2" MARKER 1/2 PIPE DIAMETER MIN. SEE NOTE 2. SANITARY SEWER EX STORM SEWER PIPE GRAVITY MAN STORM SEWER PIPE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL EX STORM STRUCTURE 9-fi 0 SERVICES TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH PLASTIC PIPED SEWER STORM STRUCTURE Wi (D) MANS FOR DEPTH OF COVER 16 FEET OR LESS. NOTES: L SOLVENT WELD Al JOINTS. (NON GASKETED) 2 WHEN SANITARY SEWER SERVICE IS NOT ACCOMPANIED BY A WATER SERVICE IN THE SAME TRENCH, INSTALL A 6' HEAVY METAL FENCE POST NEXT TO 2 X 2 EX. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE MARKER AND PANT TOP 6. OF POST FLORESCENT GREEN. 3. CLEANOUT REQUIRED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY IF DISTANCE FROM MAN TO HOUSE Q EXCEEDS 90 FEET. 4. ALL PIPE SHALL BE BEDDED ON GRANULAR BORROW 314A OR COURSE FILTER AGGREGATE (31t4�9 )) p 11 HYDRANT :- 0 TYPICAL SANITARY �4�1�11 �Upf�Ip� MGM SERVICE REOSED: Sas ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLATE No.. 2001 iiiiiiiiix rlLr trAME. G£NG\SPEC5,3lA1 SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 CITY PROJECT NO. CHANHASSEN,' MINNESOTA Bearings am based on the Carver CountyCoon inate system (NAD 83 - 1986 ad, I 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SYMBOL LEGEND LOT LINE BUILDING SETBACK BOUNDARY PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS RIGHT-OF-WAY EX STORM SEWER PIPE STORM SEWER PIPE EX STORM STRUCTURE 9-fi 0 STORM STRUCTURE Wi (D) STORM STRUCTURE LABEL EX SANITARY SEWER PIPE SANITARY SEWER PIPE EX. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE Q SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE Q EX WATERMAIN WATERMAIN HYDRANT :- GATE VALVE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SWALE eoF PRE CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE POST CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE WOODFIBER BLANKET DITCH CHECKS UTILITY POLE JAMES BRUDOS 2061 West 65th Street Chanhassen, MN. 55317 Contact: James Brudos Tel: 612.850.4949 Email: jmbrudoscompany@gmail.com ENGINEER/LAND SURVEYOR SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 S. Broadway Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 Engineer: Nate Herman Land Surveyor: Rory Synstelien Tel: 952-476-6000 Fax: 952-476-0104 Email: nherman@sathre.com rory@sathre.com Zoning: RSF Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet, Rear: 30 feet, Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet, Rear: 10 feet Lot Requirements - Lot Area: 15,000-1 Frontage: 90; Depth: 125 Hard Cover - 30 Percent "PRELIMINARY" FILE NO. UTILITY PLAN 42425-001 2061 WEST 65TH STREET 2 JAMES BRUDOS Y 2 low SCANNED j = CenterPoint. Energy November 10, 2014 Sharmeen AL-Jaff Senior Planner 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen.. MN 55317 RE: Metes and bounds subdivision of a .69 acre parcel into two lots. Dear Mrs. AL-Jaff: 700 West Linden Avenue PO Boz 1165 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1165 With reference to your request. CenterPoint Energy has no natural gas mains within the area requested but does have main in the road Right of Way and with that CNP has no objection to this proposal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 612-321-5381. Respectfully, CENTERPOINT ENERGY �aj Alla'+Ilf" Chuck Mayers Right -of -Way Specialist Engineering Services 612-321-5381 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CITY OF C11099SEN Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline Date: November 6 2014 Agency Review Response Deadline: November 13, 2014 Date Application Filed: November 4, 2014 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Sharmeen AI-Jaff 952-227-1134 saljaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Senior Planner ® Park Director Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60 -Day Review Period Deadline: at 7:00 .m. November 24, 2014 at 700 .m. November 25, 2014 Application: Request for a metes & bounds subdivision of a .69 -acre parcel into two (2) lots on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 2061 West 6501 Street (Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, PID 25-5350070). Applicant/Owner: John & Kimberly Corey (UPDATED PLANS) In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and Proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments ❑ Attorney ® Building Official ® Engineer ® Fire Marshal ® Forester ® Park Director ® Water Resources Carver County Agencies: ❑ Community Development ❑ Engineer ❑ Environmental Services ❑ Historical Society ❑ Parks ❑ Soil & Water Conservation District State Agencies: ❑ Board of Water & Soil Resources ❑ Health ❑ Historical Society ❑ Natural Resources forestry ❑ Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control ❑ Transportation Federal Agencies: ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ US Fish & Wildlife Watershed Districts: ❑ Carver County WMO ❑ Lower MN River ® Minnehaha Creek ❑ Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Utilities: ® Cable TV — Mediacom ❑ Electric —Minnesota Valley ® Electric — Xcel Energy Magellan Pipeline natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy Phone — CenturyLink Adjacent Cities: ❑ Chaska ❑ Eden Prairie ❑ Jackson Township ❑ Minnetonka ❑ Shorewood ❑ Victoria Adjacent Counties: ❑ Hennepin ❑ Scott School Districts: ❑ Eastern Carver County 112 ❑ Minnetonka 276 Other Agencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority ❑ MN Landscape Arboretum ❑ Southwest Transit - ❑ TC&W Railroad COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CHANgASSEN Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Please review and respond no later than the review response dead Date Application Filed: Date: Agency Review Response Deadline: November 6, 2014 November 13, 2014 Contact Phone: November 4, 2014 Contact: Contact Email: Sharmeen AI-Jaff 952-227-1134 saUaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Senior Planner 60 -Day Review Period Deadline: Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: nt 7:00 n.m. November 24, 2014 at 7:00 .m. November 25, 2014 Application: Request for a metes & bounds subdivision of a .69 -acre parcel into two (2) lots on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 2061 West 651" Street (Lot 3, Block 2, Moline's Addition, PID 25-5350070). Applicant/Owner: John & KimberlyCore UPDATED PLANS). In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperat' n and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: Federal Agencies: Adjacent Cities: ❑ Attorney��iii, ElArmy Corps of Engineers E] Chaska Building Ofwi"' ❑ US Fish & Wildlife ❑ Eden Prairie ® �jQ ❑ Jackson Township ve Marshal Watershed Districts: ❑ Minnetonka El Carver County WMO El Shorewood ® Park Director ❑ Victoria ® Water Resources ❑ Lower MN River ® Minnehaha Creek Adjacent Counties: ❑ Creek Carver County Agencies: Riley -Purgatory -Bluff ❑ Hennepin ❑ Community Development Utilities: ❑ Scott ❑ Engineer ❑ Environmental Services ® Cable TV — Mediacom School Districts: ❑ ❑ Historical Society Electric — Minnesota Valley ❑ Parks ® Electric — Xcel Energy ❑ Eastern Carver County 112 ❑ Soil & Water Conservation District ❑ Magellan Pipeline ❑ Minnetonka 276 ® Natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy State Agencies: ® Phone — Centuryl-ink Other Agencies: ❑ Board of Water & Soil Resources ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad ❑ Health Authority ❑ Historical Society ❑ MN Landscape Arboretum ❑ Natural Resources -Forestry ❑ SouthWest Transit ❑ Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ TC&W Railroad ❑ Pollution Control ❑ Transportation ` moi' - - - - �� f < I 1 / / k I j _ .. /n rl i I _ FNDP/ it i i ��\\ ---- -- _ i �/ //✓ /'�� L----1-- Southerly Extension I - _ _ _ _i j iii of the Easterly Line -- - I of Lot 3, Block I y I 9NH;_--`T.�_>rnite� Se.�Per>,y Recall Dr° _ _ est 65th _Street ' - I Rim=1061.2 \ ' 1 > > I I I.M 1049.8 \ \ \_ Centerlif West I 65th reet l sanitary Ser,�ice Per City I / / Record DrawingsI \ / Inv = 94a+/– I \ \ RmH�_._ atermain Per City Record Oro.ngs \ FO I 1 j -- Utility Easement Per Doc. 7r— "° 598°' N87°31'14"W _ / 195.00 F° _ — X— I ------ I I FO— FO FO FND P OPEN Public R/1111, ELE ECC Eo T_ _ rNH= 1 6 L O _ _ _ _ _ 106 2-1 \ \ \ –� Easementor ic RR/1111,o Fooroinage alFa Utnty A / , E E laurpO Per Dm No / A I L o I 1 \ L0 (0 II I 0 Septic Mound \ 0 1 \ 35 5 Ed I \ 0/ � I\`` —� / o�s1i m �r 0 14.6 N `- \ O TroanSIM YN6th 4. 6Shret Chha, MN _ 1061.4 \ \ Building Fwndolion Am°: 1520 ° \ \ Sq. FL i Il \ Noux 2. \ \ \ \ \ \ 3 .8 I IS_o Deck .BLOCK 2 I \ A \ x 0 1? D IP�EN� _ � I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ • END 9235 _ `- — FNO IP OPEN FND ,a r._N / \ \ \ \ \ \ S8Z29'21 " E 195.00 — — — — FNp IP OPEN \\ \ FIELD CREW NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. o u2i �� SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. CL DRAWN BY RLS INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. Dated ay of September, 2014. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952) 476-6000 CHECKED BY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE RLS USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING c�FRs Rory L. Syns Minnesota License No. 44565 DATE FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. en rory@sathre.com PVpa`, 9-2-14 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 3, Block 2, MOLINE'S ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County Minnesota. GENERAL NOTES 1) This Survey was performed with the benefit of a title commitment prepared by Stewart Title Guaranty Company File No. P1,14070342, Dated May 27, 2014. We note the following with regaurds to Schedule B of this commitment: 1)1) Terms, conditions, restrictions and easements, if any, contained in Underground Easement filed December 29, 1969, as Doc. No. 08283. This easement is located along the northerly 10 feet of the subject property, as shown hereon. 1)2) Terms, conditions, restrictions and easements, if any, contained in Easement filed June 3, 1983, as Doc. No. 59801. This Easement is located in the northwest comer of the subject property, as shown hereon. 1)3) Drainage and utility easements as shown on the recorded plat. 2) Site Address: 2061 W 65th St, Excelsior, MN 3) Flood Zone Information: This property is contained in Zone C (area of minimal flooding) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 270051 0005 B, effective date of July 2, 1979. 4) Parcel Area Information: The Gross land area is 30,324+/- square feet or 0.696 +/- acres. 5) Hard Cover: House - 1,520+/- square feet, Driveway 1,833+/- square feet, Concrete - 76+/- square feet, Deck 254+/- square feet, Total - 3,683+/_ square feet 6) Hard Cover Ratio = 12 percent 7) Site Elevation: Elevations are based on the Top Nut Hydrant located at the Northeast comer of the subject property having an elevation of 1062.1 (NAVD 1988). Please note that contours shown outside of a 20 foot buffer of the subject property were obtained from MnDNR LiDAR mapping. 8) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is RSF - Single Family Residential District per the City of Chanhassen's zoning map dated January 14, 2014. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation were obtained from Sec. 20-615. Lot requirements and setbacks of the Zoning Ordinance found on their web site on the date of August 25, 2014 and are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet , Side: 10 feet, Rear: 30 feet, Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet, Rear: 10 feet Lot Requirements - Lot Area: 15,000; Frontage: 90; Depth: 125 Hard Cover - 30 Percent Please note that the general restrictions for the subject property may have been amended through a city process. We could be unaware of such amendments if they are not in a recorded document provided to us. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. 9) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources: plans obtained from utility companies, plans provided by client, markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources. We have used this information to develop a view of the underground utilities for this site. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. A Gopher State One Call was submitted for this survey. Please reference Ticket No. 140570459 for a list of utility operators in this area. 017Y OEC ANH SSEN Nov n 4 2014 CHAWASSENPIAMINGOEPT ST 23. s Y DUCti LE Q w c V 'EW STE/tf a l 0 J� C TVIEW �K CIN. Y 9 i GIR. LUCY LAKE LUCRp, C 4. 4 I N HIGH ATE Cl S ELLCT. ,p `' o + TER ti `r O CIR. LAKE ¢ y,CT s T O 111 Wo a Y c Rue, V ( Y9 Beamgs are based m the Carver `, 1m i0 p4Q Q�\ M q RA rCTGC` M CountyC°ordinate Syslem (NAD 83 -1986 ) / C R0 Sp a*' d LA. � \_ A L DRY [ _ P 20 10 0 10 20 40 0 v =f E i..: Lemke Lucy SCALE IN FEET SURVEYLEGEND OO CAST IRON MONUMENT CJ A/C UNIT BITUMINOUS ® CATCH BASIN © CABLE TV PEDESTAL ;_iv CABLE TV 4 FLARED END SECTION 17 ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER CONCRETE CURB * GATE VALVE © ELECTRIC MANHOLE CONCRETE < GUY WIRE 0 ELECTRIC METER I —96o— — CONTOUR EXISTING Zi HYDRANT © GAS METER --'Q� CONTOUR PROPOSED O SURVEY MONUMENT SET 0 GAS VALVE DT DRAIN TILE • SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND --^ GUARD RAIL ELc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND Q SURVEY CONTROL POINT ❑N HAND HOLE —x—x— FENCE LIGHT POLE SOIL BORING FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND rCl, POWER POLE TREE CONIFEROUS GAS GAS UNDERGROUND G SANITARY MANHOLE TREE DECIDUOUS ONl OVERHEAD UTILITY Q SANITARY CLEANOUT 8 TELEPHONE MANHOLE -HH1111•11-111+16{} RAILROAD TRACKS SIGN OT TELEPHONE PEDESTAL > SANITARY SEWER ,972.5 GROUND ELEVATION ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL " STORM SEWER ® STORM DRAIN 0 UTILITY MANHOLE TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ® STORM MANHOLE ❑11 UTILITY PEDESTAL UTL— UTILITY UNDERGROUND i5 YARD LIGHT 0 WELL WATERMAIN TWP.116 - RGE.23 - SEC.03 FILE NO. CARVER COUNTY BOOK XXX/PAGE XXX Existing Conditions Survey 42425-001 Chanhassen For 1 MINNESOTA 2061 West 65th Street 1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 3, Block 2, MOLINE'S ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County Minnesota. PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS Beat4s are Na as m m Larva. Cm4AyC..di SyY (NAD ai- ISW 84.) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET O USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated Whis�of September, 2014. CASTIRON MONUMENT Parcel 1 rs8 M 21. n�'p• _ J N. 65M l Q FLARED END SECTION I The west 97.50 feet of Lot 3, Block 2, MOLINE'S ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County Minnesota. together with ST 23. LUL4 Ie 3 to GUY WIRE V HYDRANT easements for drainage and utility purposes over under and across the northerly 10.00 feet; the southerly 10.00 feet; the easterly 5.00 feet; and the -EW '.CNES TV EW < LXr 9 J i LIN. � LLCy LAKE LULY A0, r, , i♦ i, , i ,r f. westerly 5.00 feet thereof 11 T F I K I N I Parcel 2 (S) y LIR 4LANE a �.� CJ w y O T That part of Lot 3, Block 2, MOLINE'S ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County Minnesota Which Lies east of the west SIGN W�� 3 O "`SOY < to <4 RA < s J': LA. o��cf _ GROUND ELEVATION Y M 97.50 feet. together with easements for drainage and utility purposes over under and across the northerly 10.00 feet; the southerly 10.00 feet the Q STORM MANHOLE P easterly 5.00 feet; and the westerly 5.00 feet thereof. I Q' E i I I GENERAL NOTES I , 1) This Survey was performed with the benefit of a title commitment prepared by Stewart Title Guaranty Company File No. PL14070342, Dated May 27, 2014. We note the following with regaurds to Schedule B of this commitment: _ 1)1) Terms, conditions, restrictions and easements, if any, contained in Underground Easement filed December 29, 1969, as Doc. No. 08283. This -----------`°---- --_—_ West 65th Street I easement is located along the northerly 10 feet of the subject property, as shown hereon. 1)2) Terris, conditions, restrictions and easements, if any, contained in Easement filed June 3, 1983, as Doc. No. 59801. This Easement is located in the northwest comer of the subject property, as shown hereon. I 1)3) Drainage and utility easements as shown on the recorded plat. his Survey was performed without the benefit of a title commitment. There may be easements encumbering the subject property of which we i are unaware. N87°31'14"W 195.00 I 97.50 2) Site Address: 2061 W 65th St Excelsior, MN o 0 97.50 3 Flood Zone Information: This is contained in Zone C area of minimal flooding) Flood Insurance Rate ) property ( g) per Map, Community Panel No. r — — — — — — — 0 — — —t— � 270051 0005 B, effective date of July 2, 1979. 5 I J , oI t �r — — — — — — — — — — — — 4) Existing Parcel Area Information I 1 5 5 1 , 1 5 4)1) Parcel Area Information: The Gross land area is 30,324+/- square feet or 0.696 +/- acres. A A / 1 I / / I IA / F- _ / 1 4)2) Hard Cover: House - 1,520+/- square feet Driveway 1,833+/- square feet Concrete - 76+/- square feet Deck 254+/- square feet, Total - j 4\ /_ 13,683+/- square feet L _ / 1 /I V L — I / 4)3) Hard Cover Ratio = 12 percent 1--------------------- 1 97.50 -------------------- -r I-------------------- 97.50----------------------i- 5) Proposed Parcel Area Information I I I I 5)1) Parcel 1 Area =15,165 I I I I 5)1)1) Hard Cover: None Parcel 1I 1 Parcell 5)1)2) Hard Cover Ratio = 0 i 5)2) Parcel 2 Area =15,159 (0I I I I I I IT 5)2)1) Hard Cover: House - 1,520+/- square feet, Driveway 1,833+/- square feet, Concrete - 76+/- square fee, Deck 254+/- square feet Total - � 1 3,683+/- square feet I 1 I 5)2)2) Hard Cover Ratio = 24 Percent I I 31 I 6) Site Elevation: Elevations are based on the Top Nut Hydrant located at the Northeast comer of the subject property having an elevation of 1062.1 '00 I I (NAVD 1988). Please note that contours shown outside of a 20 foot buffer of the subject property were obtained from MnDNR LiDAR mapping. 04 I I LLJ I NI I I � 7) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is RSF - Single Family Residential District per the City of anhassen's zoning O I 1 °j I 110 map dated January 14, 2014. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation were obtained from Sec. 20-615. V) I 1 C141 I o Lot requirements and setbacks of the Zoning Ordinance found on their web site on the date of August 25, 2014 and are as follows: I 4--- 27.1 ----' 1 (V O I I I I Z Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet, Rear: 30 feet, I 5 I I 1 1 I I I Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet, Rear: 10 feet I I I I Lot Requirements - Lot Area: 15,000; Frontage: 90; Depth: 125 I 1 I I Hard Cover - 30 Percent I I I I I I I I Please note that the general restrictions for the subject property may have been amended through a city process. We could be unaware of such 1 I I I amendments if they are not in a recorded document provided to us. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator I 1 I BLOCK TOCK ^ for the current restrictions for this site. L 1 1 5 1 \ S --Proposed Drainage and Utility Easements -- ,`-'�\ 1 8) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following L — — — — — — — — — 15 -r--- — �` �` I sources: plans obtained from utility companies, plans provided by client markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources. We have — — — — — — — L — — — — 15 used this information to develop a view of the underground utilities for this site. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground _ _ _ _ o _ _I 1 — — — — — — — -r — — J features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised o 97.50 i that excavation may be necessary. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the 97.50 subject property. A Gopher State One Call was submitted for this survey. Please reference Ticket No. 140570459 for a list of utility operators in S87029'21"E 195.00 this area. Beat4s are Na as m m Larva. Cm4AyC..di SyY (NAD ai- ISW 84.) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET O USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated Whis�of September, 2014. CASTIRON MONUMENT ® rs8 M 21. n�'p• _ J N. 65M l Q FLARED END SECTION M GATE VALVE ST 23. LUL4 Ie 3 to GUY WIRE V HYDRANT O -EW '.CNES TV EW < LXr 9 J i LIN. � LLCy LAKE LULY A0, • C N SURVEY CONTROL POINT DR LA 1�pY ' 4104 TE II c. o sr� ` `~ LIGHT POLE I N I O (S) y LIR 4LANE a �.� CJ w y O T S C SIGN W�� 3 O "`SOY < to <4 RA < s J': LA. o��cf _ GROUND ELEVATION Y M STORM DRAIN Q STORM MANHOLE P L Q' E Beat4s are Na as m m Larva. Cm4AyC..di SyY (NAD ai- ISW 84.) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET O USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated Whis�of September, 2014. CASTIRON MONUMENT ® CATCH BASIN Q FLARED END SECTION M GATE VALVE < GUY WIRE iCr HYDRANT O SURVEY MONUMENT SET • SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND U SURVEY CONTROL POINT LIGHT POLE cC� POWER POLE (S) SANITARY MANHOLE O SANITARY CLEANOUT I SIGN ,972.5 GROUND ELEVATION ® STORM DRAIN Q STORM MANHOLE YARD LIGHT SURVEY LEGEND A A/C UNIT © CABLE TV PEDESTAL O ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER OE ELECTRIC MANHOLE OE ELECTRIC METER 0 GAS METER 0 GAS VALVE GUARD RAIL R HAND HOLE SOIL BORING TREE CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS (1) TELEPHONE MANHOLE ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0 UTILITY MANHOLE ❑u UTILITY PEDESTAL OW WELL – BITUMINOUS CTS CABLE TV CONCRETE CURB 0 CONCRETE —96o— — CONTOUR EXISTING 9so CONTOUR PROPOSED oT DRAIN TILE ELc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND —X—X— FENCE FO FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND GAS UNDERGROUND OVERHEAD UTILITY -� RAILROAD TRACKS > SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND uTL UTILITY UNDERGROUND WATERMAIN FIELD CREW NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated Whis�of September, 2014. ��ERs Soq� `Oo w SATH RE-BERGQUIST, INC. o # 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952)476-6000 m " Pvp� TWPA 16 - RGE.23 - SEC.03 Lot Split Exhibit or 2061 West 65th Street FILE NO. 42425-001 CARVER COUNTY CL DRAWN BY BOOK XXX/PAGE XXX Chanhassen MINNESOTA MINNESOTA 1 RLS CHECKED BY RLS DATE Rory L. ynste Minnesota License No. 44565 rry nnthrn mm GRADING &EROSION CONTROL PLAN t � i -r-r-'m�A MOW -`-1060 awi019.6 / � > ,Saty ySe wPer Gty Reord DrawingskDSNN West StreetRin=1061.2 � > > ,;6" COREDRILL _ ' > > / / 1 5onitary Service Per City �y--� �-'-- > > " / INV:105t.0 Reaord9 rawings tj9' > >--j _ _"�0 a6+/ Qcy9 6 m Qh9 �' Watertnain Per City Record Drawings 1Qh $ \ 1 Al—I I I N I 1 06 ti ` ?��REE I Fo h x I \ is x,oa^�� gl-� �— ` I 9 Foo j'� FO FIE FD...::':" :•':'..".. MD IF \ \ -0 p FL Epi z 5 0 E T- "i.;, -v'•_ . o \ \ \ - 20- r T r-----�-- --- \ s Oop t I L oI1+ a i :.,�., s---�m64/ O \ I \ 100 o o .TIq 9 x1059 1Qh9 x1,3159 15 x�6° _ I Al NY: 106'3 Iastic Ci4 \ \ I \ f --- ----� Hca ----1 x 9' , L .•T: \ 1 m� 97.5d --------- - �x'°��Q N x1Q59� I\\ x'ep22- \'o I I Plastic C131I f 15? \ :'.: \ s° I I TQ 1059.2 1 J I BLDG PAD a1' INV: 1057.E Iry I I i I I 77.5 I D.,. •: `` , .......:.. y .,. Q g` . \ I GF 1062- --- x, o )g jKS�... x1060 GRND WTR: 1 TFI F ±1058.4 I I 1063.0 SeP b and I `. t,•:: \ I • I \\ BF 1061.5- r�-...•6 . �,r_ 1 1060 I m / \ F-, -, (1.5' o i06Li CRAWL SPACE) I � •0 0 ry , .5 - t4sl- I L H Two Story H 4' { Q% Adress dust, 2061 West 65th Street Plastic OB2 1 \ I x1Q6 Bud Chanhassen, MN I \ rrI / x I 1 .0 n9 Foundation Arco: 1520 Sq. Ft. \ TC: 1060.2 teat I / -- -- j REMOVE 2. I { \ INV: 1057.7 1,-r (1 623 I j (SEPTIC I I \ o j I ,1.+ s, I SYSTEM I HOU5e \\\ 1Qa1� 5 r , ( xi , -- --- -- - —a I \ Ii 1.6 I J Plast(,t65 3.8 15.0l- \ 1 /6 \ 1061 / 1o6p. T�0,060.4 106 1 I \\\ I x, �• \—_ x/�-- �Ox I I f�V:1058.4 x I Deck j ' \\ \'RasticC I �J -- \ c2.— -+– ---I —"/ ' > I I T�� 1 VI t�o- TC: hE)f 0.0 I/ \ �, d, X2.0% .0 I 1 < B L 0 C 2 \ \ \ \ % n tNV;,l 059.6 4"0.9E3 Q for \\ �i I ~ � \ ` I to I rj I p posed Drainage an Utility; Easements L� y_�------�1Q61 10,013 -r 1060 1060 X--- x15 sned 0 • `ND IF14235 \ 97• F P OPEN FND IF OPEN \ \ \ \ \ x x \1G6"}` ` 6� _ — `) .y FND IF OPEN \ \ x 1Q 1` / 1065 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 7068. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS: MN TOLL FREE (800 252-1166 TWIN CITIES (651) 454-0002 or 4N CONSTRUCTION NOTES INSTALL SILT FENCE, AND/OR TREE PRESERVATION FENCING AT GRADING LIMITS, AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY, WATERSHED, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. INSTALL ROCK ENTRANCE BERM REMOVE NECESSARY TREES AND SEPTIC SYSTEM VERIFY SEWER SERVICE INVERTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION DUE TO EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY, 1.0% GRADES ARE PROPOSED TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE 1" COPPER WITH CURB BOX TAPPED INTO EXISTING MAIN REMOVE ONLY NECESSARY STREET TO INSTALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND RESTORE STREET TO MATCH EXISTING STREET SECTION. INSTALL SADDLE TO CONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO MAIN. THE SEWER SERVICE SHALL BE 4" SDR 26 AT A MINIMUM OF 2% GRADE UP TO THE PROPERTY LINE. PLUMBING CODE MUST BE FOLLOWED WHEN SEWER SERVICE IS EXTENDED FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE HOUSE. CITY DETAIL PLATES SHALL GOVERN NORM eeadngs am Eased on the Cave CountyCoordimue System ?M W-1986 aQ) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SYMBOL LEGEND USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA /�' �SL hes o SATHRE-BERGQUIST 2 p INC • a �, , 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952)476-6000 m r �� c�FRs P`P�? CITY PROJECT NO. GRADING &EROSION CONTROL PLAN CHANHASSEN, 2061 WEST 65TH STREET MINNESOTA JAMES B RU DOS LOT LINE --- DRAWN BY 02 NRH 10031/14 REVISE PER SUBSOIL INVESTIGATION BUILDING SETBACK BOUNDARY NRH CHECKED BY RSM PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE Nathan R. Herman, P.E. Date: o o f Lic. No. Lf 7 X18 Z 09/02/14 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS RIGHT -0F -WAY EX STORM SEWER PIPE - STORM SEWER PIPE EX STORM STRUCTURE STORM STRUCTURE tp'>) STORM STRUCTURE LABEL EX SANITARY SEWER PIPE SANITARY SEWER PIPE EX. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE S EX WATERMAIN WATERMAIN HYDRANT GATE VALVE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SWALE EOF PRE CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE - - -- - - - POST CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE - - -- - - - WOODFIBER BLANKET DITCH CHECKS UTILITY POLE DEVELOPER JAMES BRUDOS 2061 West 65th Street Chanhassen, MN. 55317 Contact: James Bmdos Tel: 612.850.4949 Email: jmbrudoscompany@gmail.com ENGINEER/LAND SURVEYOR SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 S. Broadway Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 Engineer: Nate Herman Land Surveyor: Rory Synstelien Tel: 952-476-6000 Fax: 952-476-0104 Email: nherman@sathre.com mry@sathre.com Zoning: RSF Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet , Side: 10 feet, Rear: 30 feet, Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet, Rear: 10 feet Lot Requirements - Lot Area: 15,000; Frontage: 90; Depth: 125 Hard Cover - 30 Percent "PRELIMINARY" DRAWING NAME NO. BY DATE REVISIONS USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA /�' �SL hes o SATHRE-BERGQUIST 2 p INC • a �, , 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952)476-6000 m r �� c�FRs P`P�? CITY PROJECT NO. GRADING &EROSION CONTROL PLAN CHANHASSEN, 2061 WEST 65TH STREET MINNESOTA JAMES B RU DOS FILE NO. 42425-001 BASE West... 01 NRH 09/23/14 REVISE GRADING, ADD DRAINTILE DRAWN BY 02 NRH 10031/14 REVISE PER SUBSOIL INVESTIGATION 2 NRH CHECKED BY RSM DATE Nathan R. Herman, P.E. Date: o o f Lic. No. Lf 7 X18 Z 09/02/14 DRAWING NAME BASE West... DRAWN BY NRH CHECKED BY RSM DATE 09/02/14 UTILITY PLAN FND IP REMOVE & REPLACE STREET & CURB IN KIND est �(/,\ G 70 SY SIAH � > _ - > > Sanitary Sewer per City Record Drawings V J th tp Street Rim -1061 > -1061.2 ;6 COREDRILL > Inwp49H 1 N > I Sanitary Service Per City I > > INV:1056.0 Record Drowings I Inv =948+/- w I I y9" I I \°0� atermain Par City Record Orowings I I I FO l B I - o I 97.50_- FO Fa F .... ;- FND m apEt1 �' ` r Fyf. j�✓�} 13 ELE ELE ---F-- 059 - 6" D.T r -��E - - - - - "I09.INSTALL kEW o4s 5 g "�` - - - - - - 1 ^UT1Cl2E.. X. 20' E° WAT€RSERVICE F - - - - - - - '.' 1059.6 INV: 1056.8 i i6 VOCE-_---- NH= 5 E`� 61, FOR PARCEL__ I T ::pR FAR, 2 1060 X /6 [D.TILE ♦ `4�TILIZE EX. 1 51 UTWZE EX. 1 5 F° y i .. ,.�.:.I. A INV: 1056.3 SA -Ni; ARY SERVICE ". - SANITARY SERVICE I _ �� - - FOR�A6t`EL 1 I FOR PARCEL 2 I 6 r -------_ I Plastic CE�4 IDsol m 0-� 1 5�• -TC: 10547 ,' I 1 i NV 1Q56.7 66D.DI 1059 X 1 i Plastic CB1 t- - - .- -- j 1` 1 5�.0 22. _ 11159. TC: 1059.2 1059 ?d9 I i3LDG PAD Parce - - - - �W '` INV: 1057 " I 77.5'x60' CD 1059 i G F 10 i 1 5 W 62.7 GRND WTR: �1 ±1058.4 0� TF 1063.0 1A .0 (0I BF 1061.5 �o 1 I jN � 1 1060 I p 06.1 m 0, 1 (1.5' N CRAWL SPACE) 0 a I Two Ston House 4' I .- Actress: 2061 West 65th Street Plastic C62 1 Bugtling Founaotlms A": 1520 Sq. Ft, MI -4 1 TC: 1060.2 INV: 1057.7 I ; I 20 (1062:5] - +�+ I 4 I 1 �N s 7-- � •A] I1 Plastic C135 3.6 15.01 1 1 *0 Tt060.4 •0 1 NV: 1668.4 1 Deck Plastic C L®� - X20% , D x'70 -1 1 1 I I TC: 1060.0 � �� -006� 2.0% > 670 i 1 INV: 1058.0 �I060.9 /Ofi0.3 10 S 0d I }��'H1t{ 5 1 \ ,-Proposed Drainage and Utility] Easements L - _ _ - - - - - - - - 5 -r--- L r - \ \ \ \ - - - - - - J \ \ 1 5 shed \ X FND IP FND IP OPEN _ 97.50 O O ° 97. ' Ip OPEN O � PND IP 9235 _ GNO IF OPEN NO. BY DATE I REVISIONS 01 NRH 09/23/14 REVISE GRADING, ADD DRAINTILE 02 NRH 10/31/14 REVISE PER SUBSOIL INVESTIGATION USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC's EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. 0 FND IP (WEN E EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS: MN TOLL FREE (800 252-1166 TWIN CITIES (651) 454-0002 CONSTRUCTION NOTES INSTALL SILT FENCE, AND/OR TREE PRESERVATION FENCING AT GRADING LIMITS, AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY, WATERSHED, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. INSTALL ROCK ENTRANCE BERM REMOVE NECESSARY TREES AND SEPTIC SYSTEM VERIFY SEWER SERVICE INVERTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION DUE TO EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY, 1.0% GRADES ARE PROPOSED TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE 1" COPPER WITH CURB BOX TAPPED INTO EXISTING MAIN REMOVE ONLY NECESSARY STREET TO INSTALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND RESTORE STREET TO MATCH EXISTING STREET SECTION. INSTALL SADDLE TO CONNECT SANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO MAIN. THE SEWER SERVICE SHALL BE 4" SDR 26 AT A MINIMUM OF 2% GRADE UP TO THE PROPERTY LINE. PLUMBING CODE MUST BE FOLLOWED WHEN SEWER SERVICE IS EXTENDED FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE HOUSE. CITY DETAIL PLATES SHALL GOVERN CE Street PL Variable 6' Metal fence post --- denoting Curb be, Top 6• pointed blue. - - - Curb box with 1 1/4- stondpipe and stationary rod --- EX STORM STRUCTURE N11111111 <18 STORM STRUCTURE 1W (D) <10 v, water Service r 1•X1" Corporotion Cock t• Type 'K• Copper Concrete Black Support - Water Main NOTES: 1. Do not plug end of curb stop. 2. Add 6• Crimped pigtail to cum stop. 3. The copper service line between the main and curb box HYDRANT shall be one continoas piece of piping, splices will not be permitted 4. Corporation coda to be 1' x 1• inside diameter. 5. Saddles required on 6' DIP or smaller mains and all mains PRE CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE and all mains 12• or larger. 5. Saddles when required shall be Ford style F202 double strap. 7. Stainless steel saddles required on all PVC watermain. �y 1d„ YI CM TYPICAL UTILITY POLE WATER SERVICE rav®:stt ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PIATE No: 1005 FlLL NANE: oEwaerccstaos I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN OR SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF,MINNESOTA. Nathan R. Herman, P Date: o o / Lic.No. 778 -7- oFR S P i m "" N c L CL PL VARIABLE FENCE 9, POSTS i z� WYE PLUGGED EN m 1/B BEND a 6' PVC SOR-26 PIPE MIN- SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT m w J 2"X2• MARKER 1/2 PIPE OW4ETER MIN. SEE NOTE 2. SANITARY SEWER GRAVITY MAIN SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL SERVICES TO BE USED IN COMUNCT10N WITH PLASTIC PIPED SEWER MAINS FOR DEPTH OF COVER 16 FEET OR LESS. NOTES: 1, SOLVENT WELD ALL JOINTS. (NON CASKETED) 2. WHEN SANITARY SEWER SERVICE IS NOT ACCOMPANIED BY A WATER SERVICE IN THE SAME TRENCH, INSTALL A 6' HEAVY METAL FENCE POST NEXT TO 2 X 2 MARKER AND PAINT TOP 6" OF POST FLORESCENT GREEN. 3. CLEANOUT REQUIRED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY IF DISTANCE FROM MAIN TO HOUSE EXCEEDS 90 FEET. 4, ALL PIPE SHALL BE BEDDED ON GRANULAR BORROW 314A OR COURSE FILTER AGGREGATE (31411 p 0�p��p�Q�t TYPICAL SANITARY LIYYIO�IO➢11 SEWERSERVICE REVISED, due PLATE Na.: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2001 nLE NILE: G:'ENGSPECST[mt SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN. 55391 (952)476-6000 CITY PROJECT NO. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Bearings are based an the Cava CountyCoordinate System W83-1986 aq) 20 10 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SYMBOL LEGEND LOT LINE BUILDING SETBACK BOUNDARY PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE --- DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS RIGHT-OF-WAY - - - EX STORM SEWER PIPE STORM SEWER PIPE --- EX STORM STRUCTURE N11111111 <18 STORM STRUCTURE 1W (D) <10 STORM STRUCTURE LABEL EX SANITARY SEWER PIPE SANITARY SEWER PIPE - EX. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EX WATERMAIN WATERMAIN HYDRANT GATE VALVE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SWALE Et1F PRE CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE - - -- - - - POST CONSTRUCTION SILT FENCE - - -- - - - WOODFIBER BLANKET DITCH CHECKS UTILITY POLE E :: ala 8 2061 West 65th Street Chanhassen, MN. 55317 Contact: James Brudos Tel: 612.850.4949 Email: jmbrudoscompany@gmail.com SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. 150 S. Broadway Ave. Wayzata, NIN 55391 Engineer: Nate Herman Land Surveyor: Rory Synstelien Tel: 952-476-6000 Fax: 952-476-0104 Email: nherman@sathre.com rory@sathre.com Zoning: RSF Principal Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet, Rear: 30 feet, Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet, Rear: 10 feet Lot Requirements - Lot Area: 15,000; Frontage: 90; Depth: 125 Hard Cover - 30 Percent "PRELIMINARY" FILE NO. UTILITY PLAN 42425.001 2061 WEST 65TH STREET 2 JAMES BRUDOS 2