Loading...
04-15-24 Council packet itemCity Council Item April 15, 2024 Item Consider Preliminary Plat and Site Plan request for Market Street Addition; Redevelopment of the Chanhassen Cinema and Hotel. (Planning Case 24-01) File No.24-01 Item No: G.1 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By Eric Maass, Community Development Director Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "Motion to approve the preliminary plat and site plan for Market Street Addition contingent on conformance with staff review comments and adopt the Findings of Fact." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The City Council considered this proposal at their meeting on March 11, 2024 and tabled action to April 15th, 2024. The applicant is requesting preliminary plat and site plan approval for the construction of two mixed use buildings totaling 310 market rate apartment units and approximately 14,882 square feet of leasable commercial space. BACKGROUND Roers Companies has applied to redevelop approximately four acres of property near the intersection of West 78th Street and Market Boulevard. The four acres proposed consist of the Country Inn & Suites and the now-closed Chanhassen Cinema. 314 The plans submitted for the redevelopment include two buildings, which would include about 14,000 square feet of first-floor commercial space to be used for restaurants, retail, or additional commercial services. Upper stories would consist of approximately 310 market-rate apartments and amenity decks. The buildings themselves have a variety of building heights, including areas that are one, two, five, and six stories in height. The project would include both structured and surface parking to serve the development with a total of 575 parking spaces, 406 of which would be structured parking. The Planning Commission reviewed and voted 7-0 to approve a variance to the build to zone as requested. This variance was required as portions of the west building were not within the newly established build to zone of 0-15 feet with a maximum setback of approximately 26 feet. The cause of the added setback was the result of Market Blvd curving away to the west and away from the subject property. The Planning Commission also considered the requested preliminary plat and site plan. Following a public hearing and discussion amongst the planning commission, the commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and site plan. The meeting minutes from the planning commission that include comments from the public hearing have been attached to this case for reference. The City Council tabled the applications requesting preliminary plat and site plan approval at their meeting on March 11th so that questions regarding parking could be further analyzed and the overall design of the proposed buildings could be refined. Timeline April 15, 2024 | The City Council will consider the requested applications for preliminary plat, site plan, and tax increment financing for the proposed redevelopment project. April 8, 2024 | This City Council meeting was cancelled and rescheduled to April 15th. March 25, 2024 | The City Council held a second work session with the applicant to review architectural design of the proposed project. March 18, 2024 | The City Council reviewed the proposed architectural design of the project and provided feedback to the applicant and their design team for recommended revisions. March 11, 2024 | The City Council will consider the proposed redevelopment project applications for project approvals, including the request for tax increment financing. February 20, 2024 | The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing for interested community members to provide public comment on the proposed project. The Planning Commission will provide a recommendation to the City Council. January 22, 2024 | The city received formal land use applications from Roers for the proposed redevelopment project. January 17, 2024 | Roers Company hosted a public open house at the Chanhassen Recreation Center. Residents who attended provided feedback on the project and were able to ask questions about the future of the site. January 9, 2024 | The Economic Development Commission reviewed the requested Tax Increment Financing request and recommended approval of the request to the Economic Development Authority. The City Council serves as the City's Economic Development Authority. September 25, 2023 | Chanhassen City Council adopted Ordinance 715, adopting new standards for the downtown area zoning district and lifted the development moratorium. August 21, 2023 | Neighborhood open house hosted by Roers Companies to gather neighborhood feedback on the proposal. 315 July 17, 2023 | Roers Companies presented a preliminary redevelopment concept to the City Council. (7.17.23 Presentation attached to this case for reference). July 17, 2023 | Chanhassen City Council enacts development moratorium to update Central Business District (CBD) zoning district. April 5, 2023 | Chanhassen Cinema announces its permanent closure. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission and staff recommends approval of the requested preliminary plat and site plan contingent upon compliance with the city staff report and adoption of the attached findings of fact and decision. The Planning Commission adopted a resolution finding that the TIF plan was compliant with the City's Comprehensive Plan. ATTACHMENTS Development Review Application Applicants Project Description Market Street Addition Preliminary Plat Site Plan - Updated April 10, 2024 West Building Architectural Renderings and Material Board West Building Architectural Elevations East Building Architectural Renderings and Material Board East Building Architectural Elevations Complete Civil Plan Set - Feb 1, 2024 Updated Staff Report - Land Use Applications for April 15, 2024 City Council Findings of Fact and Decision Project FAQ Photometric Plan Traffic Study Parking Study Comprehensive Project Communications Report Prior To March 11, 2024 Feb 20 2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Public comments received prior to public hearing at planning commission Comments to add to CC Packet received after PC meeting Public Comments Received March 12th - April 10th Preliminary Redevelopment Concept Presented to City Council on July 17, 2023 Memo to City Council on architecture and parking dated April 12, 2024 316 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division – 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address – P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1100 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Date: PC Date: CC Date: 60-Day Review Date: Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply) (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Single-Family Residence ................................ $325 All Others......................................................... $500 Interim Use Permit (IUP) In conjunction with Single-Family Residence .. $325 All Others......................................................... $500 Rezoning (REZ) Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 All Others......................................................... $500 Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 Site Plan Review (SPR) Administrative .................................................. $100 Commercial/Industrial Districts* ...................... $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: (______ thousand square feet) *Include number of existing employees: __________ *Include number of new employees:__________ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_____ units) Subdivision (SUB) Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $500 Create over 3 lots ....................... $1000 + $15 per lot (_____ lots) Metes & Bounds (2 lots) .................................. $300 Consolidate Lots .............................................. $150 Administrative Subd. (Line Adjustment) .......... $150 Final Plat + $15 per lot .................................. $700* *(Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs) *Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC) ........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Single-Family Residence ............................... $150 All Others ....................................................... $275 Appeal of Administrative Decision........................ $200 Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) ................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. Notification Sign (City to install and remove) ...................................................................................................................... $200 Property Owners’ List within 500’ (City to generate after pre-application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address (____ addresses) Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply) ....................................................................... $ per document Conditional Use Permit - $50 Wetland Alteration Permit - $50 Variance - $50 Interim Use Permit $50 Easements (__ easements) $85 Metes & Bounds Sub (2 deeds) $250 Site Plan Agreement - $85 Vacation - $85 Deeds - $100 TOTAL FEE: Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Property Address or Location: Parcel #: Legal Description: Total Acreage: Wetlands Present? Yes No Present Zoning: Requested Zoning: Present Land Use Designation: Requested Land Use Designation: Existing Use of Property: Check box if separate narrative is attached. 317 Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed b y the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to pr oceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: Property Owner Email______________________________ Name: Applicant Email______________________________ Address: Engineer Email______________________________ City/State/Zip: Other* Email______________________________ Email: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. 318 Project Descripon · ID: 25-11-90-030: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC (Parking) · ID: 25-11-90-010: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC (Hotel/Parking) · ID: 25-11-90-040: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC (Parking) · ID: 25-11-80-020: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC (Hotel/Parking) · ID: 25-11-80-010: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC (High Timber Lounge) · ID: 25-44-60-011: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC (Sliver west of Theater) · ID: 25-28-30-010: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC (Theater) Required Applicaons: · Preliminary Plat · Final Plat (later) · Site Plan · Vacaon of Easements Urban Design: The development site sits within a super-block bounded by 78th Street to the north, Market Boulevard to the west, Market Street to the south and Great Plains Boulevard to the east. This block, measuring 670’ north to south and over ¼ mile east to west is unbroken by any roads. Several parcels have no frontage on a public right of way and rely on access easements through adjacent parcels. The large amount of grade change from north to south further inhibits access through the superblock. One of the primary urban design goals of the proposed development is to provide more legible connecons through the site. Toward that goal, the development is split into two buildings separated by an extension of Laredo Drive to the southern boundary of the development site. This extension of Laredo Drive will be sloped to the maximum praccable extent in order to facilitat e a future further extension of Laredo south to Market Street, if and when the property to the south is redeveloped. Within the two buildings, spaces at the street level are organized to minimize the visual impact of automobiles and promote walkability. Retail spaces and residenal support spaces line 78 th Street and the Laredo Drive extension. Walk-up townhomes line the west side of the West Building. Structured parking is located behind these acve uses at stree t level and below grade. Below a 51-stall surface parking lot in the northwest corner will be underground stormwater tanks. Sidewalks will line all streets, and planted boulevards with canopy trees will be provided wherever possible, both to provide shade for pedestrians and to create a buffer between the street and sidewalk. All retail spaces will have their primary entrances facing the street. Customers will park either in the northwest surface lot or within the street-level structures parking garage in the west building. Two paseos allow pedestrian access from the customer parking area to 78th Street and the business entrances. The retail space on the corner of 78th and Market is designed to house a restaurant including a covered, outdoor dining terrace facing the corner and the new City Hall building. 319 Architecture: The development team’s design goal is to create an architecture suited to a mixed use downtown. Along 78th Street, the retail spaces are expressed in one- and two-story volumes. The upper floors of housing are stepped back from this retail base. The West Building is the larger of the two buildings and has more than 300’ of frontage along 78th Street, similar in scale to the length of a tradional city block. The massing of the building is sculpted into several disnct volumes that help evoke the idea of a tradional town center made up of individual buildings that have accreted over me. The two larg est recesses in the façade coincide with the paseos that provide pedestrian connecons from the custome r parking to 78th Street. These recesses help provide way-finding to the paseos. Several upper-story step backs contribute to a varied cornice line. The West Building features a large, west-facing outdoor recreaonal terrace along Market Boulevard. An addional amenity space occurs at the upper level o f the building affording views toward the Civic Center Campus. The East Building is oriented toward Laredo Drive and is set back from 78th Street, aligned with Aldi and The Venue. This setback serves to maintain exisng traffic paGerns, namely the connecon of the Aldi parking lot to Laredo Drive. Stormwater tanks serving the enre development sit below this parking lot . Similar to the West Building, The north elevaon of the East Building is composed of a one-story base of commercial storefronts, with several stories of housing above that are stepped back from the base. A strategic upper story step back on the north façade accommodates an upper-level terrace and club room that face north and west. Due to the grade change across the site, the East Building’s underground parking is gradually revealed toward the south and on the south façade, the parking is lined with four walk-up flats with generous paos. Parking: In an effort to develop a compact, pedestrian-focused, vercally-mixed-use community in the Downtown Mixed use character area, the development team is endeavoring to make the most efficient use of parking stalls both within the redevelopment parcels and among several adjacent parcels that have an effecve surplus of under-ulized parking. The propo sed plan provides 467 stalls (of which 406 are enclosed) on the development sites. In addion to t hese on-site stalls, there are several legal agreements in place that allow the Cinema (East Building) parcel rights to parking stalls on adjacent properes. The Chanhassen municipal code provides t hat for mixed use projects, parking requirements shall be determined by the city based on the uses. A parking demand study is being prepared to calculate the parking demand of the enre project, taking into account differing peak mes generated by different uses. Listed below are the off-site parking resources the development team proposes to use in order to sasfy the development’s required parking: · 25 surface stalls south of the “cinema parcel” (East Building): o An exisng easement (Doc # A387167) allows the cine ma parcel unrestricted use of 25 stalls. We propose to use these stalls for residents of the East Building. 320 · 103 enclosed stalls in the Southwest Transit parking garage: o An exisng easement (Doc #A662708) gives The Venue and Cinema parcels access to 103 stalls in the SW Transit parking facility but restricts use to weekends and weekday nights between 6:00 pm and 2:00 am the following morning. This me restricon doesn’t allow these stalls to be effecvely used for resident parking but the allowable mes correspond closely with the typical peak use of guests of residents. The development team proposes to use 37 of these stalls toward the combined 65 required guest stalls for The Venue and East Building. · The “cinema parcel” has rights to park in the enre parking lot south of The Venue, but overnight parking is restricted. 321 322 323 NO PARKING78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDLAREDODRIVENO PARKINGPROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT 10.5'10.4'PROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT PROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT PROPOSED 6' D&U EASEMENT TIE INTO EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER16.0'A A A A A A AA A A B B C D D D D D E C 18.0'26.0'18.0'7.0'18.0'8.0'8.0'5.0'P F P P 9.0' M ME E E N N N N N N G G G G H H H H H H H E TRANSFORMERS, SEE MEP PLANS TRANSFORMERS, SEE MEP PLANS18.5'15.9'7.3'9.5'11.2' 116.7'35.9'5.0'5.0'11.0'II K A L O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O OOO FUTURE CURB - BY OTHERS FUTURE CURB - BY OTHERS PROPOSED D&U EASEMENT PROPOSED D&U EASEMENT 26.0'18.0'7.9'36.0'12.1'5.6'24.0'36.0'4.7' 9.0' 19.8'9.8' EXISTING CURB 7.0'8.6'6.0'26.0'8.3' 17.1'1.9'24.0'2.7'2.5'10.8'8.9'13.4'11.3'11.9'6.0' 8.8' 60.0' FUTURE ROW R30.0' R10.0' R10.0' R10.0' R10.0' 3.1' 11.0' 0.6' 2.9'1.1'0.6'JJ J J J J J JJ J 13.0'6.0'7.5' LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 OUTLOT A P Q Q 6.2' 5.1' R R R RETAINING WALL STAIRS - SEE ARCH PLANS STAIRS STAIRS - SEE ARCH PLANS H H H GENERATOR, SEE MEP PLANS BARRICADES PER CITY DETAIL 7.3' 11.6'5.0'N5.0'6.0'11.3'5.3'18.0'9.0'13.0'37.3'GENERATOR, SEE MEP PLANS S DO NOT DISTURB EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL T T5.0'I L K BUILDING OVERHEAD - SEE ARCH PLANS UNDERGROUND STORMWATER SYSTEM EXTENTS COORDINATE TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATION WITH CITY EAST BUILDING - SEE ARCH PLANS (126 HOUSING UNITS) WEST BUILDING - SEE ARCH PLANS (184 HOUSING UNITS) 10.0' 13.7' 17.1' 23.6'14.1'5.7'9.0' 11.6'13.8'20.0' 111.8' 20.0'16.7'3.7'1.9' 5.0' 42.1'N 21.7' 9.0' EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENT 8.3' R10.0'R3.0'R10.0' R5.0' R3.0' R5.0' R10.0' R3.0'8.3'14.5'J J J P P 1.7' 3.5' 11.9' 16.0' F F F F G G U U F F F F 6.2'13.9'G G U OUTLOT B BUILDING OVERHEAD - SEE ARCH PLANS BUILDING OVERHEAD - SEE ARCH PLANS 4.0'4.1'DOG RUN8.0'12.1'13.1'15.0'1.8'H O O V V DO NOT DISTURB EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL O O J PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 1 RPBCWD SUBMITTAL 03/20/2024 NORTH LEGEND PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 4.09 AC / 178,247 SF DISTURBED AREA 5.57 AC / EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.36 AC / 146,306 SF / 82.1% EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 0.73 AC / 31,941SF / 17.9% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.66 AC / 159,455 SF / 89.5% PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 0.43 AC / 18,792 SF / 10.5% SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PROPOSED LAND USE MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING AND RETAIL REQUIRED PARKING SETBACKS SIDE/REAR = 0' RIGHT OF WAY = 0' REQUIRED/PROVIDE BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (WEST BLDG) = 0' / 10.4' SIDE (EAST BLDG) = 0' / 7.5' REAR (WEST BLDG) = 0' / 10.8 RIGHT OF WAY (WEST BLDG) = 0' /10.5' SITE PLAN NOTES 1.REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF STOOPS, TRUCK DOCKS, TRASH ENCLOSURES & PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS. REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LIGHT POLES, CONDUITS, AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 2.REFER TO CERTIFIED SITE SURVEY OR PLAT FOR EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING EASEMENTS, PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, AND ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY & PARCEL INFORMATION. 3.DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE DRAWN TO THE FACE OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT, AND AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATING EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED WORK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TRAFFIC SIGNS, LIGHT POLES, ABOVEGROUND UTILITIES, ETC. PERFORM WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 5.TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 9.0-FEET IN WIDTH AND 18-FEET IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 6.MONUMENT SIGN(S) ARE DETAILED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIGN DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND REQUIRED PERMITS WITH THE OWNER. BUILDING DATA WEST BUILDING AREA (FOOTPRINT)66,721 SF EAST BUILDING AREA (FOOTPRINT)39,221 SF TOTAL BUILDING AREA (FOOTPRINT)105,943 SF PERCENT OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 59.44% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED 78' WEST BUILDING PROPOSED HEIGHT 76'-8" WEST BUILDING FIRST FLOOR HEIGHT VARIES 15' TO 16' WEST BUILDING UPPER FLOORS HEIGHT 10'-8" TO 11'-8" EAST BUILDING PROPOSED HEIGHT 69'-2" EAST BUILDING FIRST FLOOR HEIGHT 14'-0" EAST BUILDING UPPER FLOORS HEIGHT 10'-8" TO 11'-8" PARKING SUMMARY REQUIRED TOTAL PARKING TO BE DETERMINED BY CITY PARKING ANALYSIS PROPOSED INTERNAL PARKING - WEST BUILDING 338 SPACES (64 OPEN TO PUBLIC) PROPOSED INTERNAL PARKING - EAST BUILDING 68 SPACES PROPOSED EXTERNAL PARKING - NORTH AREA 54 SPACES PROPOSED EXTERNAL PARKING - EAST AREA & SOUTH OFFSITE AREA 15 SPACES SOUTHERN OFF-SITE PARKING (RIGHTS VIA EASEMENT NO.A387167)25 SPACES SOUTHEAST OFF-SITE VENUE APARTMENT EXCESS PARKING 75 SPACES TOTAL PROVIDED PARKING 575 SPACES REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING 15 SPACES PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING 15 SPACES PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FENCE RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION RIGHT OF WAY PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION CONCRETE SIDEWALK SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R C400 SITE PLAN KEYNOTE LEGEND SIDEWALK, SEE INSET A PUBLIC ASPHALT PAVEMENT, SEE INSET B HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT, SEE INSET C STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT, SEE INSET D HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT, SEE INSET E B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, SEE DETAIL ON SHEET TRANSITION CURB & GUTTER FROM FULL HEIGHT TO FLAT CURB MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY, SEE CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLATE 5207 RAISED PATIO, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS LANDSCAPE AREA, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, SEE DETAIL ON SHEET TRANSITION CURB & GUTTER FROM B618 TO B612 STOP SIGN BOLLARD "NO PARKING - LOADING ZONE ONLY" SIGN FLAT CURB BIKE RACK ATTACHED TO PAVEMENT - PRODUCT TBD A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V FUTURE CURB AND GUTTER - BY OTHERS UNDERGROUND BMP PROPOSED TREE TRENCH LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 324 Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/5/2024 7:00:53 PMA.16 WEST BUILDING - 3D VIEWS Project Number Author Checker Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN LAND USE APPLICATION UPDATE 4/05/2024 WEST BUILDING -STREET LEVEL VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NW CORNER OF MARKET BLVD & 78TH STREET INTERSECTION WEST BUILDING -VIEW OF WALK-UP UNITS AND STREETSCAPE ALONG MARKET BLVD WEST BUILDING -VIEW OF SOUTHWEST CORNER LOOKING NORTH ALONG MARKET BLVD WEST BUILDING -VIEW OF RESTAURANT, RESIDENTIAL LOBBY ENTRY, AND PARKING ACCESS PASSAGEWAY ALONG 78TH STREET WEST BUILDING -VIEW OF NORTHWEST CORNER AND 78TH & MARKET BLVD FRONTAGES WEST BUILDING -VIEW OF NORTHEAST CORNER AND LAREDO DRIVE EXTENSION BETWEEN THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS No. Description Date 325 Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/5/2024 7:00:54 PMA.16.1 WEST BUILDING - 3D VIEWS Project Number Author Checker Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN LAND USE APPLICATION UPDATE 4/05/2024 No. Description Date WEST BUILDING -VIEW FROM KRAUS-ANDERSON PROPERTY LOOKING NORTH WEST BUILDING -GROUND LEVEL VIEW OF WALK-UP UNITS & STREETSCAPE ALONG MARKET BLVD LOOKING SEWEST BUILDING -GROUND LEVEL VIEW OF WALK-UP UNITS & STREETSCAPE ALONG MARKET BLVD LOOKING NE WEST BUILDING -VIEW OF SOUTHWEST CORNER LOOKING NE FROM MARKET BLVD 326 Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/5/2024 7:00:55 PMA.18 WEST BUILDING - EXTERIOR FINISHES Project Number Author Checker 02/13/24 Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN LAND USE APPLICATION UPDATE 4/05/2024 BRICK 1A -COLOR #1 BRICK 1B -COLOR #2 STONE 2A CAST STONE 2BARCHITECTURAL PRECAST 3A -COLOR #1 METAL PANEL 5A -COLOR #1/ METAL BALCONY & RAILING 12D METAL PANEL 5B -COLOR #2/ METAL HEAD PANEL 10C/ METAL SILL PANEL 10D FIBER CEMENT PANEL 6A -COLOR #1 COMPOSITE WINDOW FRAME 8A/ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAME 8B/ METAL BALCONY & RAILING 12C METAL FLASHING 10A No. Description Date FIBER CEMENT PANEL 6B -COLOR #1 327 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4"GROUND STORY HT.16' - 0"11' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"SEE PLAN PASSAGEWAY SEE PLAN PASSAGEWAY OPEN BUILDING HEIGHT GROUND LEVEL 100'-0" (EL: 976') [10' ABOVE LOWEST ADJOINING GROUND LEVEL] ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT @ 5-STORY PORTION63' - 0"BUILDING HEIGHT (TO ELEVATOR OVERRUN)76' - 8"1A 1B5A 8B 6A 6A 2B 10A 5A 23A10C10D LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" MINUS 1 LEVEL 89' - 4"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 8"GROUND STORY HT.16' - 0"10' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT GROUND LEVEL 100'-0" (EL: 976') [10' ABOVE LOWEST ADJOINING GROUND LEVEL] AMENITY ROOF 172' - 4" ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT TO ELEVATOR OVERRUN76' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT @ TYPICAL 6-STORY PORTION72' - 0"9B 2B 2B 2A8C 6A12C 8A 10C 9A 9A5B5A 8B 1A 5A 6A2B 10D 6A 1B1B1A10A 10A 8C Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/5/2024 7:00:39 PMA.12 WEST BUILDING ELEVATIONS Project Number Author Checker Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN LAND USE APPLICATION UPDATE 4/05/2024 3/32" = 1'-0"A.12 1 NORTH ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.12 2 EAST ELEVATION EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES 1A BRICK - COLOR #1 1B BRICK - COLOR #2 1C BRICK - COLOR #3 1D BRICK - COLOR #4 2A STONE - COLOR #1 2B CAST STONE STRINGCOURSE - COLOR #1 3A ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #1 3B ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #2 5A PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #1 5B PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #2 5C PREFINISHED PROFILED METAL PANEL - COLOR #3 6A FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #1 6B FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #2 6C FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #3 6D FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #4 8A COMPOSITE WINDOW/DOOR UNIT 8B ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 8C OVERHEAD DOOR 9A EXTERNAL LOUVER GRILLE - COLORS VARY 9B PREFINISHED MECHANICAL LOUVER 10A PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING/TRIM - COLOR #1 10B PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING/TRIM - COLOR #2 10C PREFINISHED METAL HEAD PANEL 10D PREFINISHED METAL SILL PANEL 12A METAL RAILING SYSTEM 12C PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEM -COLOR #1 16A CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STOOP KEY PLAN KEY PLAN No. Description Date ACCENT MATERIAL PERCENTAGE EAST ELEVATION: 28% NORTH ELEVATION: 28% WEST ELEVATION: 23% SOUTH ELEVATION: 37% TOTAL (PRIMARY ELEVATIONS): 30% TOTAL (ALL BUILDING FACES): 24% PRIMARY ELEVATIONS 328 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" MINUS 1 LEVEL 89' - 4"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 8"GROUND STORY HT.16' - 0"10' - 8"LOCATION FOR PUBLIC ART MURAL OPPORTUNITY COURTYARD ELEVATION BEYOND. SEE SHEET # /4 A.14 BUILDING HEIGHT GROUND LEVEL 100'-0" (EL: 976') [10' ABOVE LOWEST ADJOINING GROUND LEVEL] ALTERNATE LOCATION FOR PUBLIC ART MURAL OPPORTUNITY AMENITY ROOF 172' - 4" ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT @ TYPICAL 6-STORY PORTION72' - 0"3A9B 1B 5A 6A 1A TOTAL AREA:25,070 SF BRICK AREA: 4,305 SF PRECAST AREA: 5,000 SF LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" MINUS 1 LEVEL 89' - 4" COURTYARD ELEVATION BEYOND. SEE SHEET # /1 A.14 BUILDING HEIGHT GROUND LEVEL 100'-0" (EL: 976') [10' ABOVE LOWEST ADJOINING GROUND LEVEL]10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 8"GROUND STORY HT.16' - 0"BASEMENT10' - 8"UPPER STORIES HEIGHTSAMENITY ROOF 172' - 4" ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT (TO ELEVATOR OVERRUN)76' - 8"63' - 8"1A 1B 6B 5A 6A 10A 8B TOTAL AREA: 17,310 SF BRICK AREA: 4,120 SF 12A16A Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/5/2024 7:00:44 PMA.13 WEST BUILDING ELEVATIONS Project Number Author Checker Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN LAND USE APPLICATION UPDATE 4/05/2024 3/32" = 1'-0"A.13 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.13 2 WEST ELEVATION EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES 1A BRICK - COLOR #1 1B BRICK - COLOR #2 1C BRICK - COLOR #3 1D BRICK - COLOR #4 2A STONE - COLOR #1 2B CAST STONE STRINGCOURSE - COLOR #1 3A ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #1 3B ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #2 5A PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #1 5B PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #2 5C PREFINISHED PROFILED METAL PANEL - COLOR #3 6A FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #1 6B FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #2 6C FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #3 6D FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #4 8A COMPOSITE WINDOW/DOOR UNIT 8B ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 8C OVERHEAD DOOR 9A EXTERNAL LOUVER GRILLE - COLORS VARY 9B PREFINISHED MECHANICAL LOUVER 10A PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING/TRIM - COLOR #1 10B PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING/TRIM - COLOR #2 10C PREFINISHED METAL HEAD PANEL 10D PREFINISHED METAL SILL PANEL 12A METAL RAILING SYSTEM 12C PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEM -COLOR #1 16A CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STOOP KEY PLAN KEY PLAN No. Description Date 329 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION 5A 9A 10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"AMENITY ROOF 172' - 4" ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8" 6A LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4"6A10A 10C 12C 12C PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION 2B AMENITY ROOF 172' - 4" ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8" 1A LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" 23A PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8" 9A 1B6A LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" 9A 6A PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION 10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 8"ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8" 6A 12C9A 10C LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" 12A PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION 10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 8"ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8" 6A 8A 12C 1B Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/5/2024 7:00:52 PMA.14 WEST BUILDING ELEVATIONS Project Number Author Checker Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN LAND USE APPLICATION UPDATE 4/05/2024 3/32" = 1'-0"A.14 1 WEST COURTYARD - WEST-FACING ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.14 2 WEST COURTYARD - SOUTH-FACING ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.14 3 WEST COURTYARD - NORTH-FACING ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.14 4 SOUTH COURTYARD - SOUTH-FACING ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.14 5 SOUTH COURTYARD - EAST-FACING ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.14 6 SOUTH COURTYARD - WEST-FACING ELEVATION EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES 1A BRICK - COLOR #1 1B BRICK - COLOR #2 1C BRICK - COLOR #3 1D BRICK - COLOR #4 2A STONE - COLOR #1 2B CAST STONE STRINGCOURSE - COLOR #1 3A ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #1 3B ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #2 5A PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #1 5B PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #2 5C PREFINISHED PROFILED METAL PANEL - COLOR #3 6A FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #1 6B FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #2 6C FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #3 6D FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #4 8A COMPOSITE WINDOW/DOOR UNIT 8B ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 8C OVERHEAD DOOR 9A EXTERNAL LOUVER GRILLE - COLORS VARY 9B PREFINISHED MECHANICAL LOUVER 10A PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING/TRIM - COLOR #1 10B PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING/TRIM - COLOR #2 10C PREFINISHED METAL HEAD PANEL 10D PREFINISHED METAL SILL PANEL 12A METAL RAILING SYSTEM 12C PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEM -COLOR #1 16A CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STOOP KEY PLAN KEY PLAN KEY PLAN KEY PLAN KEY PLAN KEY PLAN No. Description Date 330 Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/11/2024 10:58:35 PMA.25 EAST BUILDING 3D VIEWS Project Number Author Checker 04.12.24 Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN LAND USE APPLICATION UPDATE 04/05/2024 1 3 6 4 No. Description Date 2 5 12 34 55 331 Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/11/2024 10:58:36 PMA.26 EAST BUILDING 3D VIEWS Project Number Author Checker 04.12.24 Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN LAND USE APPLICATION UPDATE 04/05/2024 No. Description Date 8 7 7 8 10 9 9 10 332 Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/12/2024 11:38:26 AMA.18.1 EAST BUILDING - EXTERIOR FINISHES Project Number Author Checker Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN LAND USE APPLICATION UPDATE 4/05/2024 No. Description Date BRICK 1C -COLOR #3 BRICK 1D -COLOR #4 ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST 3B -COLOR #2 METAL PANEL 5B -COLOR #2/ METAL HEAD PANEL 10C/ METAL SILL PANEL 10D FIBER CEMENT PANEL 6A -COLOR #2 COMPOSITE WINDOW FRAME 8A/ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAME 8B/ METAL BALCONY & RAILING 12C METAL FLASHING 10A FIBER CEMENT PANEL 6C -COLOR #3 FIBER CEMENT PANEL 6B -COLOR #1 FIBER CEMENT PANEL 6D -COLOR #4 PREFINISHED PROFILED METAL PANEL 5C - COLOR #3 EXAMPLE OF BRICK SPANDREL DESIGN DETAIL 333 LEVEL 1 103' - 4" LEVEL 2 114' - 0" LEVEL 3 124' - 8" LEVEL 4 135' - 4" LEVEL 5 146' - 0" ROOF 156' - 8" MINUS 1 LEVEL 87' - 0" LEVEL RETAIL 100' - 0"14' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"4' - 0"975' 975' 971'8' - 6"14' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"59' - 11"1C 1D 5B 5B 6B 6A6A8A6A 6D 12C12A6B 8B 1C10B 4' - 0"64' - 8"69' - 2"LEVEL 1 103' - 4" LEVEL 2 114' - 0" LEVEL 3 124' - 8" LEVEL 4 135' - 4" LEVEL 5 146' - 0" ROOF 156' - 8" MINUS 1 LEVEL 87' - 0" LEVEL RETAIL 100' - 0"71' - 11"8' - 6"78' - 2"72' - 11"6A 5C 9A 6B 5B 6B 1C 9A10B Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/12/2024 11:12:35 AMA.22 EAST BUILDING ELEVATIONS Project Number Author Checker 04.12.2024 Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN LAND USE APPLICATION UPDATE 04/05/2024 3/32" = 1'-0"A.22 1 NORTH ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.22 2 SOUTH ELEVATION No. Description Date ACCENT MATERIAL PERCENTAGE NORTH ELEVATION: 40% SOUTH ELEVATION: 13% EAST ELEVATION: 20% WEST ELEVATION: 22% BUILDING TOTAL: 23% EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES 1A BRICK - COLOR #1 1B BRICK - COLOR #2 1C BRICK - COLOR #3 1D BRICK - COLOR #4 2A STONE - COLOR #1 2B CAST STONE STRINGCOURSE - COLOR #1 3A ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #1 3B ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #2 5A PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #1 5B PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #2 5C PREFINISHED PROFILED METAL PANEL - COLOR #3 6A FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #1 6B FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #2 6C FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #3 6D FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #4 8A COMPOSITE WINDOW/DOOR UNIT 8B ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 8C OVERHEAD DOOR 9A EXTERNAL LOUVER GRILLE - COLORS VARY 9B PREFINISHED MECHANICAL LOUVER 10B PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING/TRIM - COLOR #2 10C PREFINISHED METAL HEAD PANEL 10D PREFINISHED METAL SILL PANEL 12A METAL RAILING SYSTEM 12C PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEM -COLOR #1 16A CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STOOP 334 LEVEL 1 103' - 4" LEVEL 2 114' - 0" LEVEL 3 124' - 8" LEVEL 4 135' - 4" LEVEL 5 146' - 0" ROOF 156' - 8" MINUS 1 LEVEL 87' - 0" LEVEL RETAIL 100' - 0" 975' 971'60' - 8"69' - 2"71' - 11"6A 6D 6B 3B8C8C1D1C 6C LEVEL 1 103' - 4" LEVEL 2 114' - 0" LEVEL 3 124' - 8" LEVEL 4 135' - 4" LEVEL 5 146' - 0" ROOF 156' - 8" MINUS 1 LEVEL 87' - 0" LEVEL RETAIL 100' - 0" 975' 971'4' - 0"59' - 11"72' - 11"69' - 2"65' - 2"6B 6A 6D 6C 6B 3B 5C 9A 8B 6B 6A 6B Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/12/2024 11:12:40 AMA.23 EAST BUILDING ELEVATIONS Project Number Author Checker 04.12.2024 Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN LAND USE APPLICATION UPDATE 04/05/2024 3/32" = 1'-0"A.23 1 EAST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.23 2 WEST ELEVATION No. Description Date EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES 1A BRICK - COLOR #1 1B BRICK - COLOR #2 1C BRICK - COLOR #3 1D BRICK - COLOR #4 2A STONE - COLOR #1 2B CAST STONE STRINGCOURSE - COLOR #1 3A ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #1 3B ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #2 5A PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #1 5B PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #2 5C PREFINISHED PROFILED METAL PANEL - COLOR #3 6A FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #1 6B FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #2 6C FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #3 6D FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #4 8A COMPOSITE WINDOW/DOOR UNIT 8B ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 8C OVERHEAD DOOR 9A EXTERNAL LOUVER GRILLE - COLORS VARY 9B PREFINISHED MECHANICAL LOUVER 10B PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING/TRIM - COLOR #2 10C PREFINISHED METAL HEAD PANEL 10D PREFINISHED METAL SILL PANEL 12A METAL RAILING SYSTEM 12C PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEM -COLOR #1 16A CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STOOP 335 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITEMATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A ARCH fullbleed E1 (30.00 x 42.00 Inches) SHEET.3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODESAND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TOANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES.4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINALUTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.NOTES:SITE BENCHMARKS:(LOCATIONS SHOWN ON SURVEY)PROJECT BENCHMARK: TOP OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPIRATION GEODETIC MONUMENT "HASSEN MNDT"ELEVATION=983.31 (NAVD 88)SBM #1: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT NEAR NORTHEASTERLYCORNER OF THE SURVEYED PROPERTY.ELEVATION= 978.35 (NAVD 88)SBM #2: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT NEAR SOUTHEASTERLYPORTION OF THE SURVEYED PROPERTY.ELEVATION=964.09 (NAVD 88)BENCHMARKSNORTHVICINITYN.T.S.SITECHANHASSEN, CARVER COUNTY, MNLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTKIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100ST. PAUL, MN 55114TELEPHONE: 651-645-4197CONTACT: MITCHELL COOKASGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERBRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION11001 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438TELEPHONE: 952-995-2000CONTACT: AARON R. SCHULZETENBERGPROJECT TEAM:SURVEYOREGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC.475 OLD HIGHWAY 8 NW, SUITE 200NEW BRIGHTON, MN 55112TELEPHONE: 612-466-3300CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER A. TERWEDOENGINEERKIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PREPARED BY: MICHAEL C. BRANDT, PE767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100ST. PAUL, MN 55114TELEPHONE: 651-645-4197OWNER / DEVELOPERROERS COMPANIES2 CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 400,PLYMOUTH, MN 55447TELEPHONE: 763-285-8808CONTACT: NICK ASTACHANHASSEN APARTMENTSSECTION 13, TOWNSHIP116 N, RANGE 23 WFORSITE DEVELOPMENT PLANSKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallARCHITECTESG ARCHITECTS500 SOUTH WASHINGTON AVENUE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415TELEPHONE: 612-339-5508CONTACT: BOB LOKENARBORETUM BLVDW 78TH STMARKET BLVD GREAT PLAINS BLVDMARKET STC000COVER SHEETSheet List TableSheet NumberSheet TitleC000COVER SHEETC100GENERAL NOTESC101PARCEL MAPV100ALTA TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYV101ALTA TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYV102ALTA TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYC200SITE DEMOLITION PLANC201TREE INVENTORY & PRESERVATION PLANC300EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1C301EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2C302EROSION CONTROL DETAILSC400SITE PLANC401TRUCK CIRCULATIONC402SITE DETAILSC403SITE DETAILSC404SITE DETAILSC500GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANC501STORM SEWER PLANC600UTILITY PLANC601UTILITY DETAILSC602UTILITY DETAILSC603UTILITY DETAILSC604UTILITY DETAILSC605UTILITY DETAILSC607UTILITY DETAILSC608UTILITY DETAILSC609UTILITY DETAILSL100LANDSCAPE PLANL101LANDSCAPE DETAILSPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E.01/19/2024462661DATE:SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONLAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024ORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateMARKET BLVD& W 78TH STNOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMMARKET BLVD& W 78TH ST336 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE LATEST EDITION OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE LOCAL JURISDICTION AND STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 3. PERFORM ALL WORK IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY REGULATIONS, STATE CODES, AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING THE NECESSARY MATERIALS & LABOR TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK, EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. 5. THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL "D" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ACSE 38/02, ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATA BY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK. 6. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. 9. ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER. 10. ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THE OWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILT INFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILT DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES ARE ENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 12. ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELL DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED. 13. ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY OBLIGATION TO PAY FOR A RELATED CHANGE ORDER. 15. SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE DOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATION, ASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION, INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALK INSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SHALL MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LOG AND RECORD ANY ADJUSTMENTS AND DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS WITHIN THE SWPPP DOCUMENTS STORED IN THE JOB SITE TRAILER. 6. BMPS SHOWN ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALL JURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIED PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A 0.5-INCH OR GREATER RAINFALL EVENT. 7. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: 7.1. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING OR DETERIORATION. 7.2. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO VERIFY THAT A HEALTHY STAND OF VEGETATION IS MAINTAINED. SEEDED AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RE-SEEDED AS NEEDED. REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 7.3. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. 7.4. THE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC ADDITIONS OF ROCK TOP DRESSING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 7.5. THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC ADDITIONS OF TOP DRESSING IF THE TEMPORARY PARKING CONDITIONS DEMAND. 7.6. PERFORM ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 2 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION. PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES 1. ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE LOCAL CITY OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS, OR THE STATE DOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS IF NOT COVERED BY LOCAL CITY OR COUNTY REGULATIONS. 2. ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D) AND CITY STANDARDS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES, PARKING STALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS, AND MISCELLANEOUS STRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 4. ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB. 5. THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET. 6. ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINT SEALANT. 7. THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN THE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 9. ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 10. BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PER A.D.A). GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 11. MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET. GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST BMP'S AS NECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS SO THAT SURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY GRADING DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR UTILITIES. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS, POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES. 5. BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT THE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE PARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLY INSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED. 6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 6" OF TOPSOIL AT COMPLETION OF WORK. ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REGRADED AND SODDED. 7. AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST AND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL ADEQUATELY DRAIN TOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED. 8. WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT FULL DEPTH FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAME TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS. 10. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED PERMITS. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 11. FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY OR TO STATE DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 12. ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THE AREAS SHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED TO MINIMUM COVERAGE OF 70% IN ALL AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND SCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 14. SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 48 HOURS OF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT EROSION, SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTING AREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND STATE DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 17. PAVEMENTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE SITE SPECIFIC GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT AND CITY & STATE DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 18. SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED SURFACE GRADE OR FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 19. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. 20. IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 21. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT COMPENSATION. 22. BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE. 23. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLANKET. 24. ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 25. ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE. WATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES, AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 2. ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 4. DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. 5. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I. PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED. ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6. WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE. 7. ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE COMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 8. UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO BACK FILLING. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. 10. BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER MANHOLES AND PIPES, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 10-FEET AND A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18-INCHES. 11. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 12. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GASKETED AND/OR GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 13. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING & COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER". EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE. 14. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 15. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 16. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT. 17. ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORM STRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 2.0% SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN. 18. PROVIDE INSULATION OF UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICES IF ADEQUATE FROST DEPTH CANNOT BE PROVIDED. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 20. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE AND BELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 21. A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 5-FEET IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER IS UTILIZED. 22. GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITY COMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 23. COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. 24. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH AND SPECIFICATIONS. 25. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS. 26. REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 27. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS. 28. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR ROUTING OF PROPOSED ELECTRICAL & COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES AND SITE LIGHTING LAYOUT. THIRD PARTY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THIRD PARTY CONSULTANTS. 1.BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PERFORMED BY: EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. ADDRESS: 475 OLD HIGHWAY 8 NW, SUITE 200, NEW BRIGHTON, MN 55112 PHONE: 612-466-3300 DATED: 09/26/2023 2.GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT PERFORMED BY: BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION ADDRESS: 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 PHONE: 952-995-2000 DATED: 10/18/2023 3.CONSTRUCTION TESTING TEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: ·DENSITY TEST REPORTS ·BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM ·PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER ·LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS ·ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITY C100 GENERAL NOTES PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 337 PID:254460010 OWNER:KRAUS-ANDERSON INC PID: 254510010 OWNER: MARKET SQUARE ASSOC LTD PTRSHP AND C/O V CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES PID: 254490010 OWNER: NEARCO IV LLC PID: 254510040 OWNER: MARKET SQUARE ASSTS II LLC PID: 257740020 OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITY PID: 250122000 OWNER: AREA INVEST LLC PID: 250122200 OWNER: STATE BANK OF CHANHASSEN PID: 251720010 OWNER: CHANHASSEN RETIAL LTD PRTSHP PID:251720020 OWNER: SPIRIT MASTER FUNDING VII LLC PID: 251720030 OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITY PID: 254610050 OWNER:CITY OF CHANHASSEN PID: 254610020 OWNER: CHANHASSEN MEDICAL ARTS II LLS PID: 251680021 OWNER: NEW CHANHASSEN HOLDING COMPANY LLC PID:2570300030 OWNER:CHANHASSEN FRONTIER LLC AND C/O CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD PID: 257030020 OWNER: AGREE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PID: 251680010 OWNER: SOUTHWEST TRANSIT PID: 252490020 OWNER: VIRGINA S THOMAS FAMILY LP PID: 252490010 OWNER: REALTY INCOME PROPERTIES 3 LLC PID: 252520010 OWNER: CHANHASSEN LETSOS LLCPID: 254510020OWNER: MARKET SQUAREASSOC LTD PTRSHP ANDC/O V CLAYTON & ASSOCIATESPID: 257740010 OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITY PID: 252750020 OWNER: BHB INVESTMENTS LLC PID: 257900210 OWNER: HAVLIK FAMILY TRUST AGMT PID: 257900220 OWNER: PAUL J & STACY K OSEN PID: 257900230 OWNER: DAVID & MEGAN L WOODS PID: 257900240 OWNER: DEAN HARLAN WALLENTINE PID: 257900250 OWNER: JACK GOGGINS PID: 257900260 OWNER: MICHAEL MEYERS PID: 257900270OWNER: MARK & ROSEANN SCHLENKPID: 257030010 OWNER: CHANHASSEN FRONTIER LLC PID: 259990200 OWNER: TWIN CITIES & WESTERN RAILROAD PID: 251680060 OWNER: CHAN H A S S E N C I T Y PID: 250136600 OWNER: CHANHASSEN HRA PID: 251190070 OWNER BLOOMBERG COMPANIES INCLAREDO DRIVE78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDNORTH LEGEND PROPERTY LINE Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R C101 PARCEL MAP PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 338 V100 ALTA TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 339 V101 ALTA TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 340 V102 ALTA TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 341 RELOCATE COMMUNICATION LINE, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. REMOVE BUILDING OVERHANG. REMOVE FLAGPOLE REMOVE GAS METER, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. REMOVE GAS METER, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. REMOVE GAS METER, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. REMOVE TRANSFORMER, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. REMOVE TRANSFORMERS, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. REMOVE TRANSFORMERS, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TRAFFIC LIGHTS. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STORM. REMOVE EXISTING RETAINING WALLS, COORDINATE WITH OWNER AND KA DEVELOPMENT. G G G G G G G PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING POWER LINE. REMOVE TRANSFORMER, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. B B B BB B B B B B B B C C C C C C C CC C C C D D D D D I I I I I I PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING UTILITIES. REMOVE EXISTING RETAINING WALLS REMOVE EXISTING RETAINING WALLS H H TYP. TYP. F F TYP. TYP. E PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TRAFFIC LIGHT. PROTECT EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLEREMOVE EXISTING RETAINING WALL PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING MANHOLE STRUCTURE, REMOVE EXISTING PIPE TO THE EAST AND PLUG STRUCTURE.A A A A A A A A A PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING POWER LINE. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STORM SEWER PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STORM SEWER REMOVE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. J J J J K K K K K K K K KK K K K K K L L L L L M M N N N L L L O P P P P P Q Q Q Q Q R R RR B D WATERMAIN LOOP MUST BE KEPT INTACT UNTIL NEW LOOP LINE IS IN PLACE, COORDINATE WITH CITY PUBLIC WORKS AND KA DEVELOPMENT PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING CATCH BASIN STRUCTURE, REMOVE EXISTING PIPE TO THE EAST AND PLUG STRUCTURE. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT OFF-SITE PARKING SURFACES CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF ALDI WATER SUPPLY TO 2 HOURS AND COORDINATE OUTAGE WITH STORE MANAGER. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ALDI STORE MANAGER FOR ACCESS SHUT DOWN. WATERMAIN REMOVAL MUST BE COORDINATED WITH ALDI STORE MANAGER AND CANNOT BE REMOVED UNTIL NEW PIPE IS IN PLACE. M A A A A A A A A A A A A A A WATERMAIN LOOP MUST BE KEPT INTACT UNTIL NEW LOOP LINE IS IN PLACE, COORDINATE WITH CITY PUBLIC WORKS AND KA DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH KA DEVELOPMENT FOR ACCESS SHUT DOWN. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH AMERICANA COMMUNITY BANK FOR ACCESS SHUT DOWN. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF OLD NATIONAL BANK WATER SUPPLY TO 2 HOURS AND COORDINATE OUTAGE WITH BANK MANAGER. CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF OLD NATIONAL BANK WATER SUPPLY TO 2 HOURS AND COORDINATE OUTAGE WITH STORE MANAGER. R R R R R R R R R R R R PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING UTILITIES. SALVAGE AND REINSTALL HYDRANT. SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN. SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT OFF-SITE PARKING SURFACES PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TRAFFIC LIGHT. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TRAFFIC LIGHT. REMOVE EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE K PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE BUILDING REMOVE TREE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES PROPERTY LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND POWER LINE EXISTING WOOD FENCE EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SIGN EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE EXISTING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING METAL COVER EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE EXISTING CABLE BOX EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE CLEARING & GRUBBING EXISTING CURB & GUTTER LEGEND FULL DEPTH SAWCUT REMOVE LIGHT POLE 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) OF ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING OF THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY REQUIRED PERMITS FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL FROM THE APPROPRIATE LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE, INCLUDING THE TYPE OF DEBRIS AND LOCATION WHERE IT WAS DISPOSED. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 5. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES TO PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN PROPOSED WORK AREA. 6. EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON AVAILABLE RECORD PLAN DATA AND/OR FIELD UTILITY MARKINGS AND ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION. ADDITIONAL UNMARKED OBSTACLES MAY EXIST ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED UNDERGROUND FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING REMOVAL OF SERVICE LINES AND CAP ANY ABANDONED LINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE PROPOSED WORK. 7. ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC. (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY, COUNTY, AND STATE DOT AS NECESSARY. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10. PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION, INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS / SWPPP. 11. CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT OR CURB, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE CITY WATER AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED. 13. IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE REQUIREMENTS. 14. IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE; ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL NOT BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. 16. IF CONTAMINATED MATERIAL IS ENCOUNTERED ON THE PROJECT SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STOP WORK AND NOTIFY THE OWNER AND ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES KEYNOTE LEGEND SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT REMOVE EXISTING CURB REMOVE EXISTING SIDEWALK REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT REMOVE EXISTING FENCE REMOVE EXISTING TREE REMOVE EXISTING SIGN REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE REMOVE EXISTING WATER LINE / HYDRANT / VALVE REMOVE EXISTING SEWER LINE / STRUCTURE REMOVE EXISTING STORM LINE / STRUCTURE PROTECT EXISTING STORM LINE / STRUCTURE PROTECT EXISTING WATER LINE / HYDRANT / VALVE PROTECT EXISTING SEWER LINE / STRUCTURE PROTECT EXISTING BUILDING / STRUCTURE REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING / STRUCTURE PROTECT EXISTING LIGHT POLE PROTECT EXISTING TREE A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q RNORTH C200 SITE DEMOLITION PLAN ABANDON UTILITY LINES IN PLACE 342 NO PARKING78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDLAREDODRIVENO PARKINGA A A A A A A A A A AA A A A A A A AA A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A B B B B B BB BB B B B B B B B A AAAA A A A A A A C C C C C C C C C C C BA B A C C C C C TREE TO BE REMOVED PROPERTY LINE TREE TO REMAIN LEGEND TREE REMOVAL: 43 TREES TREE REMOVAL: ~744 CAL. IN. REPLACEMENT CALIPER REQUIRED:~1,488 CAL. IN. = 2X THE CALIPER INCHES REMOVED TREE MITIGATION DATA 1. PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON. 2. NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE FENCE-LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM CITY. 3. SITE GRADING TO BE DONE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN, CITY HAS APPROVED FENCING LOCATIONS, AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BREIFED ON TREE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES. 4. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN OR REMOVED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED, WITHIN DISTURBANCE LIMITS AND 10' OUTSIDE OF THE DISTURBANCE LIMITS. 5. TREE PRESERVATION TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND PER LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY. TREE PROTECTION NOTES KEYNOTE LEGEND EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED (TYP.) EXISTING TREE LOCATED PER AERIAL IMAGE, DATED 08/22/23. SIZE DETERMINED VIA GOOGLE STREET VIEW, IMAGE DATED MARCH 2023, BASED ON ADJACENT TREE IN SURVEY A B C EXISTING VEGETATION EDGE C201 TREE INVENTORY & PRESERVATION PLAN PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MITCHELL COOKAS, PLA 5652201/19/2024DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 343 591 78TH STREET WEST 575 78TH STREET WEST 570 MARKET STREET 7 8 T H S T R E E T W E S T M A R K E T B O U L E V A R D7 8 T H S T R E E T W E S T B O U L E V A R DM A R K E TITEM 11 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 7 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 7 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 7 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 19 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 18 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 17 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 14 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 13 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 13 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 15 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 SD S D SD SD SD SD SDSD SDSDSDSDS DSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SDSD SDSDSD3.29%2.47%4.04%3 . 4 6%1.11% 1.11% 1. 4 3 % 1.63 %3.01%4.87%2.73%1.27 % 4 . 0 0%8.88%A B B B B B B B A C 97097 5 96 6966 966 967 96 8 96 9 971972973 973973974974 976977975 975973973 973974 974976976977 D D B A CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING OFF-SITE PARKING SURFACES B SOIL TYPE: KB 3.4 ACRES SOIL TYPE: KC-2 0.3 ACRES SOIL TYPE: KB 0.4 ACRES SOIL TYPE: LA 0.1 ACRES SOIL TYPE: CO 0.1 ACRES B B B B B B B3.74%3.57%4.76%4.94%4.64%5.14%1.72%2. 0 2%2.80%4.14%2.86% 2 . 2 7% 1.10 %1.40%0.72%1. INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL (I.E. SILT FENCE) AND INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER INLETS. 2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND CONCRETE WASHOUT 3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 4. CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS. 5. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE. 6. BEGIN MASS SITE GRADING AND ROUGH GRADE SITE SUFFICIENTLY TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. 7. START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. 8. TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE OR AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES AND/OR CITY GRADING PERMIT(S). NOTE: THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION IS INTENDED TO CONVEY THE GENERAL CONCEPTS OF THE EROSION CONTROL DESIGN AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETAILED PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY, PRIOR TO AND/OR DURING CONSTRUCTION IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE IS NECESSARY. PHASE 1 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION ROCK ENTRANCE INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SAFETY FENCE SILT DIKE LEGEND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT, AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY, ENGINEER OR OWNER. 4. SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE MUST BE REMOVED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ANY FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR. 5. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE LAND DISTURBANCE AND CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON THE PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 8. ALL WASH WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED BEFORE DISPOSAL. 9. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11. RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. 12. STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF DRAINAGE WAYS SUCH THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF WILL NOT BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. PROVIDE STABILIZATION MEASURES SUCH AS PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL BMP'S, SEEDING, OR OTHER COVERING AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT EROSION. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL BMP DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OF STORM WATER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING, CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUELS, LUBRICANT OILS, PESTICIDES, AND SOLID WASTE MATERIALS. 14. EROSION CONTROL BMP'S SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT, AND INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SHALL MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LOG AND RECORD ANY ADJUSTMENTS AND DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS WITHIN THE SWPPP DOCUMENTS STORED IN THE JOB SITE TRAILER. EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES PHASE I BMP QUANTITIES SILT FENCE ±1,355 LF INLET PROTECTION 17 EA ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 EA SILT DIKE ±1,250 LF THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP BY NOTING ON THE SITE MAPS IN THE JOB SITE BINDER TO REFLECT THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND GENERAL CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SITE FOR THE DURATION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. AT A MINIMUM, UPDATES SHALL BE MADE DAILY TO TRACK CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS DESCRIBED IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTING THE LOCATION OF THE JOB SITE TRAILER, TEMPORARY PARKING & LAYDOWN AREAS, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL & MATERIAL STORAGE, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED FACILITIES THAT MAY IMPACT STORMWATER RUNOFF. SWPPP UPDATES & AMENDMENTS KEYNOTE LEGEND SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SILT DIKE A B C D C300 EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1NORTH PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 4.09 AC / 178,247 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.36 AC / 146,306 SF / 82.1% EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 0.73 AC / 31,941SF / 17.9% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.66 AC / 159,455 SF / 89.5% PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 0.43 AC / 18,792 SF / 10.5% SD SOIL MAP LEGEND CO - CORDOVA CLAY LOAM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES 0.1 ACRES KB - KILKENNY-LESTER LOAMS, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES 3.8 ACRES KC2 - LESTER-KILKENNY COMPLEX, 6 T O10 PERCENT SLOPES, MODERATELY ERODED 0.3 ACRES LA - LE SUEUR-LESTER COMPLEX, 1 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES 0.1 ACRES PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 344 78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDLAREDODRIVESD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDS DSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD3.72%1.26%3 .92% 2. 0 8% 2.66% A B B B B B B B D C B B B BB B C 965 970970970 975 966967968969 9719719 7 1971971 972972972972972 97397497 6 977965970 9 7 5 966 967 968 969 971 9719 7 1 972973973973974 974976 975974 976 976 977 97 7 B SOIL TYPE: KC-2 0.3 ACRES SOIL TYPE: KB 0.4 ACRES SOIL TYPE: LA 0.1 ACRES SOIL TYPE: CO 0.1 ACRES B 5.21%5.21%3.66%3 . 6 6%3.22%3.49%3.49%7.41% B B B B B B B B B B BBB B1.46%1.48%SOIL TYPE: KB 3.4 ACRES 12.21%19.49%9.82%7.27%3.71% 4.79 % 3.5 5 % 1. TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DENUDED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE. 2. CONSTRUCT UNDERGROUND SITE UTILITIES AND STORM SEWER, INCLUDING UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. 3. INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION AT ANY NEW STORM SEWER STRUCTURES AS EACH STRUCTURE IS CONSTRUCTED. 4. COMPLETE SITE GRADING AND PERMANENTLY STABILIZE AREAS TO BE VEGETATED AS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE. 5. PLACE PAVEMENT BASE MATERIAL AND INSTALL SUBDRAINAGE SYSTEM. 6. CONSTRUCT PAVEMENTS, CURB & GUTTER, AND SIDEWALKS. 7. AS APPROPRIATE, REPLACE & MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WITHIN PAVED AREAS AS WORK PROGRESSES. 8. COMPLETE FINAL GRADING AND INSTALL OF PERMANENT STABILIZATION (SEEDING, SODDING, ETC.) WITHIN LANDSCAPED AREAS. 9. WHEN THE SITE HAS ACHIEVED FINAL STABILIZATION AS DEFINED BY THE APPLICABLE EROSION CONTROL PERMITS, REMOVE ALL REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND RE-STABILIZE ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. NOTE: THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION IS INTENDED TO CONVEY THE GENERAL CONCEPTS OF THE EROSION CONTROL DESIGN AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETAILED PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY, PRIOR TO AND/OR DURING CONSTRUCTION IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE IS NECESSARY. PHASE 2 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION ROCK ENTRANCE INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SAFETY FENCE SILT DIKE LEGEND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT, AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY, ENGINEER OR OWNER. 4. SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE MUST BE REMOVED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ANY FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR. 5. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE LAND DISTURBANCE AND CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON THE PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 8. ALL WASH WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED BEFORE DISPOSAL. 9. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11. RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. 12. STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF DRAINAGE WAYS SUCH THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF WILL NOT BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. PROVIDE STABILIZATION MEASURES SUCH AS PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL BMP'S, SEEDING, OR OTHER COVERING AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT EROSION. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL BMP DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OF STORM WATER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING, CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUELS, LUBRICANT OILS, PESTICIDES, AND SOLID WASTE MATERIALS. 14. EROSION CONTROL BMP'S SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT, AND INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SHALL MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LOG AND RECORD ANY ADJUSTMENTS AND DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS WITHIN THE SWPPP DOCUMENTS STORED IN THE JOB SITE TRAILER. EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES PHASE 2 BMP QUANTITIES SILT FENCE ±1,330 LF INLET PROTECTION 31 EA ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 EA SILT DIKE ±680 LF THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP BY NOTING ON THE SITE MAPS IN THE JOB SITE BINDER TO REFLECT THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND GENERAL CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SITE FOR THE DURATION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. AT A MINIMUM, UPDATES SHALL BE MADE DAILY TO TRACK CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS DESCRIBED IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTING THE LOCATION OF THE JOB SITE TRAILER, TEMPORARY PARKING & LAYDOWN AREAS, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL & MATERIAL STORAGE, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED FACILITIES THAT MAY IMPACT STORMWATER RUNOFF. SWPPP UPDATES & AMENDMENTS KEYNOTE LEGEND SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SILT DIKE A B C D PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST C301 EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2NORTH SOIL MAP LEGEND CO - CORDOVA CLAY LOAM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES 0.1 ACRES KB - KILKENNY-LESTER LOAMS, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES 3.8 ACRES KC2 - LESTER-KILKENNY COMPLEX, 6 T O10 PERCENT SLOPES, MODERATELY ERODED 0.3 ACRES LA - LE SUEUR-LESTER COMPLEX, 1 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES 0.1 ACRES PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 4.09 AC / 178,247 SF DISTURBED AREA 5.57 AC / EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.36 AC / 146,306 SF / 82.1% EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 0.73 AC / 31,941SF / 17.9% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.66 AC / 159,455 SF / 89.5% PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 0.43 AC / 18,792 SF / 10.5% SOIL BOUNDARY - PER NRCS SD 345 C302 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST N.T.S. APRON ON THIS SIDE OF THE DIKE SHALL BEFOLDED UNDER THEDIKE SECTION 20" ANDGLUED DOWN CONSTRUCTION AREA ASPHALT PAVEMENT EXISTING CONCRETE OR A A APRON ADHESIVE FLOW ADHESIVE 20"20"ADHESIVEADHESIVEADHESIVE ADHESIVE NOTES: 1. INSTALLED SILT DIKE UNIT SHALL HAVE CONTINUOUS AND FIRM CONTACT WITH PAVEMENT. 2. ADHESIVES SHALL BE LIQUID NAIL OR APPROVED EQUAL FOR CONCRETE PAVEMENT APPLICATIONSAND EMULSIFIED ASPHALT FOR ASPHALT APPLICATIONS.ADHESIVE SHALL BE PLACED WHERE THE UNITS OVERLAP AND A 20" STRIP ALONG BOTH EDGES. FLOW OVERLAP PER MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS SECTION A-A DIKE PLAN VIEW 1 SILT DIKE 346 NO PARKING78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDLAREDODRIVENO PARKINGPROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT 10.5'10.4'PROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT PROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT PROPOSED 6' D&U EASEMENT TIE INTO EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER 9.3'16.0'A A A A A A AA A A B B C D D D D D E C 18.0'26.0'18.0'7.0'18.0'8.0'8.0'5.0'P F F P P 9.0' M ME E E N N N N N N G G G G H H H H H H H E TRANSFORMERS, SEE MEP PLANS TRANSFORMERS, SEE MEP PLANS18.5'15.9'7.3'9.5'11.2' 116.7'35.9'5.0'5.0'11.0'II K A L O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O OOOO FUTURE CURB - BY OTHERS FUTURE CURB - BY OTHERS PROPOSED D&U EASEMENT PROPOSED D&U EASEMENT 26.0'18.0'7.9'36.0'12.1'5.6'24.0'36.0'4.7' 9.0' 19.8'9.8' EXISTING CURB 7.0'4.6'8.6'6.0'1.8'26.6'27.7'12.4' 8.1'1.9'24.0'2.7'2.5'10.8'8.9'13.4'11.3'11.9'6.0' 8.8' 60.0' FUTURE ROW R30.0' R10.0' R10.0' R10.0' R10.0' R10.0' 3.1' 11.0' 0.6' 2.9'1.1'0.6'JJ J J J J J JJ J 13.0'10.0'10.1'7.5' LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 OUTLOT A P Q Q 8.0' 6.2' 5.1' R R R RETAINING WALL STAIRS - SEE ARCH PLANS STAIRS STAIRS - SEE ARCH PLANS H H H H GENERATOR, SEE MEP PLANS BARRICADES PER CITY DETAIL 7.3' 11.6'5.0'N5.0'6.0'11.3'5.3'18.0'9.0'13.0'37.3'GENERATOR, SEE MEP PLANS S DO NOT DISTURB EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL T T5.0'I L K BUILDING OVERHEAD - SEE ARCH PLANS UNDERGROUND STORMWATER SYSTEM EXTENTS UNDERGROUND STORMWATER SYSTEM EXTENTS COORDINATE TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATION WITH CITY EAST BUILDING - SEE ARCH PLANS (126 HOUSING UNITS) WEST BUILDING - SEE ARCH PLANS (184 HOUSING UNITS) 10.0' 13.7' 17.1' 23.6'14.1'5.7'9.0' 11.6'13.8'20.0' 111.8' 20.0'16.7'3.7'1.9' 5.0' 42.1'N 21.7' 9.0' EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENT 8.3' R10.0'R3.0'R10.0' R20.0' R3.0' R5.0' R3.0' R3.0' R5.0' R10.0' R3.0'8.3'14.5'J J J J J P P 1.7' 3.5' 11.9' 16.0' F F F F F G G U U F F F F 6.2'13.9'G G U OUTLOT B BUILDING OVERHEAD - SEE ARCH PLANS BUILDING OVERHEAD - SEE ARCH PLANS 4.0'4.1'DOG RUN PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NORTH LEGEND PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 4.09 AC / 178,247 SF DISTURBED AREA 5.57 AC / EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.36 AC / 146,306 SF / 82.1% EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 0.73 AC / 31,941SF / 17.9% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.66 AC / 159,455 SF / 89.5% PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 0.43 AC / 18,792 SF / 10.5% SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PROPOSED LAND USE MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING AND RETAIL REQUIRED PARKING SETBACKS SIDE/REAR = 0' RIGHT OF WAY = 0' REQUIRED/PROVIDE BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (WEST BLDG) = 0' / 10.4' SIDE (EAST BLDG) = 0' / 7.5' REAR (WEST BLDG) = 0' / 10.8 RIGHT OF WAY (WEST BLDG) = 0' /10.5' SITE PLAN NOTES 1. REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF STOOPS, TRUCK DOCKS, TRASH ENCLOSURES & PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS. REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LIGHT POLES, CONDUITS, AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 2. REFER TO CERTIFIED SITE SURVEY OR PLAT FOR EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING EASEMENTS, PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, AND ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY & PARCEL INFORMATION. 3. DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE DRAWN TO THE FACE OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT, AND AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 4. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATING EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED WORK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TRAFFIC SIGNS, LIGHT POLES, ABOVEGROUND UTILITIES, ETC. PERFORM WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 5. TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 9.0-FEET IN WIDTH AND 18-FEET IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 6. MONUMENT SIGN(S) ARE DETAILED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIGN DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND REQUIRED PERMITS WITH THE OWNER. BUILDING DATA WEST BUILDING AREA (FOOTPRINT)66,721 SF EAST BUILDING AREA (FOOTPRINT)39,221 SF TOTAL BUILDING AREA (FOOTPRINT)105,943 SF PERCENT OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 59.44% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED 78' WEST BUILDING PROPOSED HEIGHT 76'-8" WEST BUILDING FIRST FLOOR HEIGHT VARIES 15' TO 16' WEST BUILDING UPPER FLOORS HEIGHT 10'-8" TO 11'-8" EAST BUILDING PROPOSED HEIGHT 69'-2" EAST BUILDING FIRST FLOOR HEIGHT 14'-0" EAST BUILDING UPPER FLOORS HEIGHT 10'-8" TO 11'-8" PARKING SUMMARY REQUIRED TOTAL PARKING TO BE DETERMINED BY CITY PARKING ANALYSIS PROPOSED INTERNAL PARKING - WEST BUILDING 338 SPACES PROPOSED INTERNAL PARKING - EAST BUILDING 68 SPACES PROPOSED EXTERNAL PARKING - NORTH AREA 59 SPACES PROPOSED EXTERNAL PARKING - EAST AREA 9 SPACES SOUTHERN OFF-SITE PARKING (RIGHTS VIA EASEMENT NO.A387167)25 SPACES SOUTHEAST OFF-SITE VENUE APARTMENT EXCESS PARKING 20 SPACES TOTAL PROVIDED PARKING 519 SPACES REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING 15 SPACES PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING 15 SPACES PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FENCE RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION RIGHT OF WAY PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION CONCRETE SIDEWALK SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R C400 SITE PLAN KEYNOTE LEGEND SIDEWALK, SEE INSET A PUBLIC ASPHALT PAVEMENT, SEE INSET B HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT, SEE INSET C STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT, SEE INSET D HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT, SEE INSET E B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, SEE DETAIL ON SHEET TRANSITION CURB & GUTTER FROM FULL HEIGHT TO FLAT CURB MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY, SEE CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLATE 5207 RAISED PATIO, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS LANDSCAPE AREA, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, SEE DETAIL ON SHEET TRANSITION CURB & GUTTER FROM B618 TO B612 STOP SIGN BOLLARD "NO PARKING - LOADING ZONE ONLY" SIGN FLAT CURB A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U FUTURE CURB AND GUTTER - BY OTHERS UNDERGROUND BMP PROPOSED TREE TRENCH LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 347 NO PARKING78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDLAREDODRIVENO PARKING9.3'16.0'18.0'NORTH Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R C401 TRUCK CIRCULATION Width Lock to Lock Time Track SU-40 Steering Angle 4.00 : : : 6.0 8.00 8.00 31.8: 25.00 feet 39.50 22.007.00 43.00 : 33.3Steering Angle 8.50 8.50 6.0 Aerial Fire Truck feet : : : Width Track Lock to Lock Time PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 348 C402 SITE DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST PAVEMENT SECTIONS FOR REFERENCE ONLY, REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT OR CITY DETAILS FOR ALL PAVEMENT, SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. N.T.S. TYPICAL SIGN MOUNTING6 1'-0" 1'-6" 3'-6" 2'-0" MIN. 7'-0" MIN. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL N.T.S. N.T.S. ADA PARKING STALL LAYOUT5 STANDARDSTALL ADA STALL ACCESSISLE ADA STALL STANDARDSTALL 6" TRANSITIONPAVEMENT TO FLUSH WITH SIDEWALK INTEGRALSIDEWALK CURBSEE DETAIL ACCESSIBLEPARKING SIGNWITH BOLLARD SEE DETAIL 2' STRIPING - 4" TRAFFIC WHITE INTEGRALSIDEWALK CURBSEE DETAIL INTEGRALSIDEWALK CURBSEE DETAIL (2% MAX.) PLAN VIEW OF ADA PARKING SECTION A-A SECTION B-B B B AA STANDARDSTALL STANDARDSTALL 1/2"6"12"60"-66"'18"ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNAGE N.T.S. WHITE SYMBOL ON BLUE BACKGOUND LEGEND & BORDER: WHITE BACKGROUND: BLUE NOTES: 1. ALL LETTERS ARE 1" AERIES "C" PER MUTCD. 2. SIGN SHALL HAVE A REFLECTORIZED (ENGINEERING GRADE) BLUE BACKGROUND WITH WHITE REFLECTORIZED LEGEND AND BORDER. 3. FINE NOTIFICATION SIGN SHALL HAVE A REFLECTORIZED (ENGINEERING GRADE) WITH WHITE LEGEND AND BORDER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY FINE AMOUNT. 5. ONE(1) SIGN REQUIRED FOR EACH PARKING SPACE. 6. INSTALLED HEIGHT OF SIGN SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 24-23 OF THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. 7. ALL ACCESSIBLE FEATURES TO BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A STANDARDS AND LOCAL LAWS. K-1479 12"x6" PLAQUE TYPICAL AT ALL VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PARKING VEHICLE ID REQUIRED UP TO $200 FINE FOR VIOLATION N.T.S. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNAGE3N.T.S. STOP SIGN2 30"30"12" 3/8" 7"7' N.T.S. FLUSH CURB1 349 C403 SITE DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 350 C404 SITE DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 351 NO PARKING78TH STREETMARKET BOULEVARD LAREDO DRIVE NO PARKING CO DDCO COD97097596997197297397497697797597 4 9769769 7 6 977970966967968969971972973965970975962 963964 966967968969971972973 9749769 7 6 9779 7 7975974974974976977960965961962963964G:976.68G:976.62G:975.79G:975.39G:975.61G:973.70G:973.60G:973.76G:973.70G:974.00G:974.66G:974.88G:974.74G:974.90G:974.95G:975.20G:975.39G:975.51G:976.17G:976.51G:975.38G:974.79G:975.35G:975.14G:974.23G:974.10G:973.17G:972.90G:971.06G:970.87975.00FFE = 975.0975.00974.65965.41962.00962.59964.00971.05967.92972.80972.00973.12973.92976.00975.50970.73968.54967.47965.98965.98966.21966.07969.50TW:975.90TW:975.90TW:975.90TW:975.75TW:975.81BW:972.16BW:972.87BW:974.84BW:975.74BW:975.893.38%3.10%2.60%2.78%3.03%3.6 6 % 4.93 %5.21%5.21%1.83%5.84%3.81%7.54%3.11%5.12%3.22%2.08%2.84%0.76%1.50% 1.50% 1.73%1.86%2.62%2.70%3.56 %2.88%28.42%3.48%2.73%3.50%3.51%4.19%4.08%FFE = 976.0FFE = 976.0FFE = 976.0FFE = 975.5FFE = 975.5FFE = 969.5FFE = 969.518.71%4.74%13.19%3.04%13.80%2.85%3.92%974.49974.49974.49974.49974.76974.76974.76974.76G:975.07G:975.07G:975.11G:975.17G:975.39G:976.55G:976.14G:976.38G:977.46G:976.13G:975.69G:975.56G:975.13G:975.17G:976.54G:977.30G:977.22G:973.38G:974.31G:974.53G:974.00G:973.24G:973.00G:974.18G:968.97G:968.34G:969.68971.85973.23973.27971.89974.00973.96975.50975.42976.92977.00976.83976.90977.00977.00976.81975.86976.00976.00975.98976.00975.98976.00976.00972.05975.50969.00968.77ME:964.27ME:963.73962.00G:974.14FFE = 976.0FFE = 977.0FFE = 977.0FFE = 963.4FFE = 974.0FFE = 971.9FFE = 966.4FFE = 967.0971.66971.84972.05972.34971.51968.68965.75965.01965.21965.90968.24968.05967.25967.06969.92970.05970.52970.40ME:965.34ME:965.26965.54965.86966.39G:970.32G:970.67G:970.84G:970.20G:970.80G:974.84G:975.01G:976.65G:976.90G:975.39G:975.50G:974.05G:974.67G:974.76G:973.71G:973.60G:973.22G:972.58G:972.52G:972.47G:965.30G:963.94G:962.97G:962.31G:961.88G:961.70G:960.54G:960.64G:960.86G:960.86G:960.60G:960.56G:960.38G:960.42G:960.66G:960.12G:959.66G:959.91G:958.66G:958.42G:958.37G:958.11G:957.97G:958.21G:960.12G:959.75G:958.52G:958.68975.00975.00975.00962.00962.00961.91961.84961.77962.00961.58961.09961.58961.58961.35961.35960.87960.87960.87960.87962.00960.57959.99959.59962.00962.00FFE = 975.0FFE = 961.0FFE = 962.0FFE = 962.0FFE = 962.0FFE = 962.0G:960.86G:962.00G:962.00974.64974.55974.66974.87975.00975.00975.00974.86973.01971.89964.47ME:964.35ME:964.51ME:964.32GRADING PLAN NOTES1. PERFORM GRADING WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY SPECIFICATIONSAND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.2. CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWOWORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.4. FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES ANDTOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTINGTHE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT.5. IN PAVED AREAS, ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE THE SITE READYFOR SUB-BASE.6. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TOHELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THEEXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTINGPAVEMENT.7. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES. SPOT ELEVATIONSALONG CURB & GUTTER REPRESENT THE FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED8. EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITYITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THECONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.9. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB ANDGUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES THAT PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOCOLLECTION POINTS. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 1.25% IN ASPHALT PAVEMENTAREAS AND A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.50% IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.10. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.50% ALONG CURB & GUTTER. REVIEW PAVEMENTGRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD THEGUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM THE GUTTER.11. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4-INCHES OF AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL UNDER PROPOSEDCONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, AND TRAILS UNLESS OTHERWISE DETAILED.12. GRADING FOR SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, INCLUDING CROSSINGDRIVEWAYS, SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT STATE & NATIONAL ADA STANDARDS:ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 8.3% (1:12).SIDEWALK CROSS-SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%.LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 5.0%.ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS AND ACCESS AISLES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% IN ANYDIRECTION. A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1.50% IS PREFERRED.SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADACOMPLIANT. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANYLOCATION PRIOR TO PAVEMENT INSTALLATION. CHANGE ORDERS WILL NOT BEACCEPTED FOR ADA COMPLIANCE ISSUES.13. UPON COMPLETION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, RESTORE ADJACENT OFFSITEAREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH OR EXCEED THE ORIGINALCONDITION. LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4-INCHESOF TOPSOIL.14. EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARYSEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS.PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPERTY LINEEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOUR925PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00LEGENDPROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0G:0.00T:0.00PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATIONT/G:0.0EOF:0.00.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION ME:0.0MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUTPROPOSED RIPRAPPROPOSED FLARED END SECTIONCODPROPOSED RIDGE LINEPROPOSED SWALEPROPOSED TOP/BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION TW:0.0BW:0.0RETAINING WALL NOTES1. RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS.2. PLANS SHOW THE HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF THE TOP OF THE WALL AND PROVIDESFINISHED SURFACE ELEVATIONS AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM FACE OF THE WALL ONLY.3. RETAINING WALL DESIGN PLANS SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER AND SUBMITTED TO THE REVIEWING AUTHORITY AND KIMLEY-HORN ENGINEEROF RECORD FOR APPROVAL.4. RETAINING WALL DESIGNER MUST ACCOUNT FOR DRAINAGE AROUND THE WALL ASSHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN. SURFACE RUNOFF SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO DRAINOVER THE TOP OF THE WALL.5. RETAINING WALL MATERIAL AND COLOR SHALL BE SELECTED BY THE OWNER.6. RETAINING WALL DESIGNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING GEOTECHNICALINFORMATION AS NEEDED FOR DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED WALL.NORTHC500GRADING ANDDRAINAGE PLANPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E.01/19/2024462661DATE:SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONLAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024ORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No. Description DateMARKET BLVD& W 78TH STNOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM©MARKET BLVD& W 78TH ST352 7 8 T H S T R E E T W E S T M A R K E T B O U L E V A R DITEM 16 &2MMIT M E 1 T 1 2  6 7 5 0 1 7 8 T H S T R E E T W E S T B O U L E V A R DITEM 16 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 16 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 16 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 M A R K E TITEM 20 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 20 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 20 &2MMIT M E 1 T 1 2  6 7 5 0 1 ITEM 17 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 17 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 11 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 7 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 7 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 7 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 20 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 20 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 19 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 18 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 13 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 13 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 13 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 10 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 17 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 14 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 13 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 13 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 8 &2MMITME1T 12 6 7 5 0 1 ITEM 16 &2MMIT M E 1 T 1 2  6 7 5 7 3 ITEM 15 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 NO PARKING78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDLAREDODRIVENO PARKINGBMP#1: PROPOSED STORMTRAP DOUBLE TRAP UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM. TOP OF STRUCTURE: 972.00 BOTTOM IE: 957.00 NORMAL WATER LEVEL: 961.00 100-YR HIGH WATER LEVEL: 965.30 DEPTH OF TANK: 15' BMP #2: PROPOSED STORMTRAP DOUBLE TRAP UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM. TOP OF STRUCTURE: 969.00' BOTTOM IE: 959.00' NORMAL WATER LEVEL: 963.00' 100-YR HIGH WATER LEVEL: 965.30' DEPTH OF TANK: 10' PROPOSED PUMP CONTROL PANEL 0+00 0+80 23 LF - 18" PVC @ 2.00% 68 LF - 24" RCP @ 2.13% 61 LF - 18" PVC @ 2.00% 36 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50% 86 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50% 36 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50% 60 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50%5 LF - 12" HDPE @ 2.00% 6 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.27% 22 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.48% 3 - 9 LF - 8" PVC @ 0.00% 18 LF - 15" RCP @ 11.03% 5 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% ST-203 ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH MEP, AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. RE:976.36 IE:972.27 N IE:963.65 S ST-402 CBMH W/ 4' SUMP RE:975.22 IE:968.80 W IE:968.80 S ST-403 RE:975.19 IE:968.98 E ST-201 RE:974.59 IE:962.44 S IE:962.44 N IE:962.44 E ST-200 RE:974.63 IE:961.00 W ST-401 RE:971.81 IE:968.37 N IE:968.37 S IE:968.37 W ST-104 RE:974.10 IE:961.00 E ST-100 REPLACE EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ELEVATIONS AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES RE:972.84 IE: 968.1 S IE:969.60 W IE:969.87 NW ST-202 ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH MEP, AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. RE:974.29 IE:962.91 N ST-601 RE:969.60 IE:963.00 S ST-600 PROPOSED STORM SEWER STUB FOR FUTURE CONNECTION. RE:969.36 IE:962.90 N ST-501 CBMH W/ 4' SUMP RE:970.61 IE:968.67 W IE:968.67 N ST-502 RE:971.79 IE:968.85 E ST-101 STMH 72" RE:974.12 3 - IE:971.00 W IE:970.00 E ST-103 10' x 12' LIFT STATION BOTTOM IE: RE:973.95 IE:960.90 W STUB ST-301 RE:974.20 IE:963.00 E ST-300 RE:974.45 IE:961.00 W ST-400 RE:971.94 IE:968.35 E ST-700 RE:974.64 IE:961.00 S 11 LF - 18" PVC @ 2.00% ST-701 ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH MEP, AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. RE:974.80 IE:961.22 N106.0'22.0'115.1'106.0' STORM CROSSING ST-402 TO ST-401 966.53 ST-201 TO ST-200 963.35 CLEARANCE IS 3.18' STORM CROSSING ST-402 TO ST-401 966.12 ST-301 TO ST-300 962.99 CLEARANCE IS 3.13' 10' SETBACK FROM WATER MAINCO 55.7'46.2' D RELOCATED CATCH BASIN CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE, AND PIPE MATERIAL IE:972.29 CBMH ST-801 RE:973.08 27 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50% CB ST-800 RE:974.57 84 LF - 6" SLOT DRAIN @ 0.50% 75 LF - 6" SLOT DRAIN @ 0.50%34 LF - 12" PVC @ 0.50%39 LF - 12" PVC @ 0.50% CB ST-1001.A RE:965.00 IE:959.09 N IE:959.09 SW 94 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.45% 57 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50% ST-902 REPLACE EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ELEVATIONS AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES RE:961.98 IE:958.79 N IE:958.79 S20 LF - 15" RCP @ 1.21% ST-901 BMP#5 - ADS BAY FILTER RE:961.14 IE:958.55 N IE:958.55 S NYLOPLAST ST-905.B RE:958.83 IE:955.71 E (4' SUMP) 54 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 10 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 23 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% CB ST-906 RE:958.90 IE:955.60 E IE:955.60 W CB ST-907 RE:958.68 IE:955.67 E IE:955.67 W 13 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 22 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% CB ST-908 RE:958.45 IE:955.78 W 46 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% OLDST-902 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ELEVATIONS AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES RE:958.57 IE:953.71 W CB ST-1001.B RE:969.00 IE:959.51 S BMP#6 ADS BAY FILTER VAULT ST-1000 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ELEVATIONS AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES RE:963.65 IE:958.80 NE ST-904 RE:959.30 IE:955.44 S IE:955.44 W ST-903 RE:959.67 IE:953.94 E BMP#3 TREE TRENCH BMP#4 TREE TRENCH NYLOPLAST ST-905 RE:958.41 IE:955.49 E IE:955.49 N (4' SUMP) ST-900 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ELEVATIONS AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. RE:960.63 IE:955.72 N 150 LF - 15" RCP @ 1.21% ST-EX CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE. RE:967.70 IE:960.60 S PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE LEGEND PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN CO PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION D STORM SEWER NOTES 1. INSTALL STORM SEWER IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY OR STATE SPECIFICATIONS, STATE PLUMBING CODE, AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76 HDPE: ASTM F-714, F-894 PVC: ASTM D-2729 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-1785, D-2665, F-794 DRAIN TILE SHALL BE: PE: ASTM F-6667 PVC: ASTM D-2729 FITTINGS SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE: ASTM D-3212 PVC: ASTM D-2729, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-794, F-1866 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 5. FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. 6. EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILED SURFACE ELEVATIONS. 7. EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 8. COORDINATE WITH THE PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS. 9. WHERE STORM SEWER ROOF DRAINS HAVE LESS THAN 4-FEET OF COVER IN PAVED AREAS OR 3-FEET OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, PROVIDE 3-INCH THICK INSULATION A MINIMUM OF 5-FEET IN WIDTH, CENTERED ON THE PIPE. 10. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WATER-TIGHT CONNECTIONS. 11. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT. BOOTED COUPLERS AT THE STRUCTURE OR A WATER STOP WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT MAY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL AIR TEST ALL STORM SEWER PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. C501 STORM SEWER PLANNORTH PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 353 NO PARKING78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDLAREDODRIVENO PARKINGCO CO 8" INCH DIP CONNECT INTO EXISTING 8" DIP WITH 8"X8" WET TAP WITH 8" GATE VALVE SSWR-201 RE:976.84 COORDINATE WITH MEP IE:964.73 E SSWR-100 RE:961.14 COORDINATE WITH MEP IE:947.66 S EXISTING SSMH RE:960.80 IE:947.60 N 30 LF - 8" PVC @ 0.50% 12 LF - 8" PVC @ 0.50% 45° BEND 8"x8" TEE 8" SERVICE - CONNECT INTO EXISTING 8" VALVE. COORDINATE WITH EXISTING OWNER PROPOSED HYDRANT AND 6" GATE VALVE 45° BEND EXISTING WATERMAIN CONNECT INTO EXISTING 10" DIP WITH 10" GATE VALVE 8" GATE VALVE 8"x6" TEE 8" DIP 8" GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT AND 6" GATE VALVE 10"x6" TEE 8" DIP CONNECT INTO EXISTING 8" DIP WITH 8" GATE VALVE CONNECT INTO CONNECT INTO 10" GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT TO REMAIN - SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 6" GATE VALVE CONNECT INTO EXISTING 10" DIP WITH 10" GATE VALVE 150' HYDRANT COVERAGE (TYP) PROPOSED UNDERGROUND DETENTION, SEE STORM SEWER PLANS FOR DETAILS PROPOSED UNDERGROUND DETENTION, SEE STORM SEWER PLANS FOR DETAILS 11.25° BEND 11.25° BEND 10"x6" TEE 10" GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT AND 6" GATE VALVE 18" DIP 18"x6" TEE AND GATE VALVE18"x6" TEE AND GATE VALVE CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND PIPE MATERIAL 10"x8" REDUCER AND 8" VALVE 10x10 TEE CONNECT TO EXISTING MAIN 18"x10" REDUCER AND 10" VALVE 10"x10" TEE 10" VALVE CONNECT TO EXISTING MAIN 18"x10" REDUCER AND 10" VALVE 18" VALVE 10" DIP 10"x10" TEE 10x6 TEE10" VALVE 10" DIP 8"x8" TEE AND 8" VALVE FOR DOMESTIC AND FIRE SERVICE 10" GATE VALVE 45° BEND 45° BEND 45° BEND 45° BEND 18" VALVE AND TEE 45° BEND 45° BEND 10" VALVE FOR DOMESTIC AND FIRE SERVICE - COORDINATE WITH MEP EXISTING HYDRANT TO REMAIN 10" DIP CONNECT INTO EXISTING SSWR CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND INVERT RE:968.17 IE:964.58 W CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND PIPE MATERIAL PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER LEGEND CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO EXISTING PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1. INSTALL UTILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY SPECIFICATIONS, STATE PLUMBING CODE, AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 4. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE: PVC: ASTM D-2729, D-3034 PVC SCH 40: ASTM D-1785, F-714, F-894 SANITARY SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE: PVC: ASTM D-2729, D-3034 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-2794, F-1866 5. WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE: PVC: ASTM D-1785, D-2241, AWWA C-900 DUCTILE IRON: AWWA C115 WATER MAIN FITTINGS SHALL BE: PVC: ASTM D-2464, D-2466, D-2467, F-1970, AWWA C-907 DUCTILE IRON: AWWA C-153, C-110, ASME 316.4 5. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76 HDPE: ASTM F-714, F-894 PVC: ASTM D-2729 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-1785, D-2665, F-794 DRAIN TILE SHALL BE: PE: ASTM F-6667 PVC: ASTM D-2729 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE: ASTM D-3212 PVC: ASTM D-2729, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-794, F-1866 6. WHEN CONNECTING TO AN EXISTING UTILITY LINE, FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION, DEPTH, AND SIZE OF THE EXISTING PIPE(S) PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE NEW LINES. NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. 7. PLACE AND COMPACT ALL FILL MATERIAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 8. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-6" COVER ON ALL WATER LINES. 9. FOR WATER LINES AND STUB-OUTS UTILIZE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 10. MAINTAIN 18-INCH MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION WHERE SEWER PIPE CROSSES WATER LINES (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). PROVIDE 10-FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN SEWER PIPE AND WATER LINES. 11. IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES (OR ANY OBSTRUCTION EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY PIPE MATERIAL SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR PVC C900 AND HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18-INCH VERTICAL SEPARATION MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 12. ALL PVC & HDPE SEWER AND WATER PIPE SHALL HAVE A TRACER WIRE INSTALLED IN THE TRENCH AND TERMINATED PER THE DETAILS. 13. UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PLACING BACKFILL. 14. IN PAVEMENT AREAS, RAISE MANHOLE CASTINGS TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. IN GREEN AREAS, RAISE MANHOLE CASTINGS TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION & INSTALL A WATERTIGHT LID. 15. REFER TO PLUMBING PLANS FOR LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND ROOF DRAINS TO THE INTERIOR BUILDING SYSTEMS. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) & METERS ARE LOCATED INSIDE THE BUILDING. 16. CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 17. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18. REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 19. EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILED SURFACE ELEVATIONS. 20. EXCESS MATERIAL, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNUSABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 21. COORDINATE WITH THE PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS. 22. WHERE STORM SEWER ROOF DRAINS HAVE LESS THAN 4-FEET OF COVER IN PAVED AREAS OR 3-FEET OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, PROVIDE 3-INCH THICK INSULATION A MINIMUM OF 5-FEET IN WIDTH, CENTERED ON THE PIPE. 23. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WATER-TIGHT CONNECTIONS. 24. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT. BOOTED COUPLERS AT THE STRUCTURE OR A WATER STOP WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT MAY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES. 25. CONTRACTOR SHALL AIR TEST ALL STORM SEWER PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. C600 UTILITY PLANNORTH 354 C601 UTILITY DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 355 C602 UTILITY DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 356 C603 UTILITY DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 357 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST C604 UTILITY DETAILS 358 LIFT STATION DETAIL PROFILE 952 960 970 980 952 960 970 980 22 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.48% 3 - 9 LF - 8" PVC @ 0.00% 6 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.27%ST-101STMH 72" 2'RE:974.12IE:971.00 WIE:970.00 EBMP#1: PROPOSED STORMTRAP DOUBLE TRAP UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM TOP OF STRUCTURE: 972.00 BOTTOM IE: 957.00 NORMAL WATER LEVEL: 961.00 100-YR HIGH WATER LEVEL: 965.30 PROPOSED 10' X 12' STORM WATER LIFT STATION H-20 TRAFFIC LOADED ACCESS HATCH STORM WATER LIFT PUMPS QTY #3 REQUIRED FLOW RATE (EACH): 230 GPM REQUIRED HEAD: 25 FT 8 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.27%8" PVC 18 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.27% 8" PVC8" PVC CBMH ST-100RE:972.84IE:969.60 WIE:969.87 NWD PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE LEGEND PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN CO PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION STORM SEWER NOTES 1. INSTALL STORM SEWER IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY OR STATE SPECIFICATIONS, STATE PLUMBING CODE, AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76 HDPE: ASTM F-714, F-894 PVC: ASTM D-2729 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-1785, D-2665, F-794 DRAIN TILE SHALL BE: PE: ASTM F-6667 PVC: ASTM D-2729 FITTINGS SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE: ASTM D-3212 PVC: ASTM D-2729, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-794, F-1866 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 5. FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. 6. EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILED SURFACE ELEVATIONS. 7. EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 8. COORDINATE WITH THE PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS. 9. WHERE STORM SEWER ROOF DRAINS HAVE LESS THAN 4-FEET OF COVER IN PAVED AREAS OR 3-FEET OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, PROVIDE 3-INCH THICK INSULATION A MINIMUM OF 5-FEET IN WIDTH, CENTERED ON THE PIPE. 10. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WATER-TIGHT CONNECTIONS. 11. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT. BOOTED COUPLERS AT THE STRUCTURE OR A WATER STOP WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT MAY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL AIR TEST ALL STORM SEWER PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. C605 UTILITY DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 359 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION01/19/2024DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST C606 UTILITY DETAILS 360 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION01/19/2024DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST C607 UTILITY DETAILS 361 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION01/19/2024DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST C608 UTILITY DETAILS 362 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION01/19/2024DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST C609 UTILITY DETAILS 363 LANDSCAPE LEGENDEXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.)EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.)EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.)EDGER (TYP.)APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SODDING/IRRIGATION,SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ARTIFICIAL TURF, SEE DETAIL (TYP.)AABCDELANDSCAPE KEYNOTESEDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)ARTIFICIAL TURF (TYP.)SOD (TYP.)MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.)NO PARKING78TH STREETMARKET BOULEVARD LAREDO DRIVE NO PARKING DDDDDDDDDBEBBBBBBEBEBEBEBEBEBEBEBADCABBPROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENTPROPOSED 10'D&U EASEMENTUNDERGROUNDSTORMWATER SYSTEMEXTENTSUNDERGROUNDSTORMWATER SYSTEMEXTENTSBOULEVARD TREES WILL BEPROVIDED BY THE CITY ASPART OF MARKET BLVD.RECONSTRUCTION IN 2025EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN (TYP.)SYMBOLCODECOMMON NAMECONIFEROUS TREEBHSBLACK HILLS SPRUCEORNAMENTAL TREEARMARMSTRONG RED MAPLERVBRIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNKOVERSTORY TREEBOLBOULEVARD LINDENIHLIMPERIAL HONEYLOCUSTPREAMERICAN ELMCONIFEROUS SHRUBSGOJGREY OWL JUNIPERSGJSEA GREEN JUNIPERDECIDUOUS SHRUBSANHANNABELLE HYDRANGEABLCIROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRYCBFIREDANCE™ RED TWIG DOGWOODDBHDWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLEDVBDWARF EUROPEAN VIBURNUMGGDGARDEN GLOW DOGWOODGLSGRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMACSEMSEM FALSESPIREAORNAMENTAL GRASSESHMSHEAVY METAL SWITCHGRASSKFG2KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASSPERENNIALSBES2BLACK-EYED SUSANEBPEMERALD BLUE CREEPING PHLOXNWWALKER'S LOW CATMINTPBSPRAIRIE BLAZING STARPCFPURPLE CONEFLOWERSH4PRAIRIE DROPSEEDPLANT KEYREPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTSCALIPER REPLACEMENT REQUIRED: 1,488 INCHESCALIPER REPLACEMENT PROPOSED: 100 INCHESNOTE: REMAINDER OF REQUIRED TREES TO BE PROVIDED AT OFF-SITE LOCATION OR PAYMENT IN LIEU OF (CITY TOCONFIRM)LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSBUFFERYARD REQUIRED:BUFFERYARD A(EAST SIDE 519 L.F.)6 OVERSTORY TREES = 1 OVERSTORY TREE / 100 L.F. OF FRONTAGE11 UNDERSTORY TREES = 2 UNDERSTORY TREES / 100 L.F. OF FRONTAGE16 SHRUBS = 3 SHRUBS / 100 L.F. OF FRONTAGEBUFFERYARD PROVIDED:4 OVERSTORY TREES(EAST SIDE 519 L.F.)0 UNDERSTORY TREES18 SHRUBSBUFFERYARD REQUIRED:BUFFERYARD A(SOUTH SIDE 905 L.F.)10 OVERSTORY TREES = 1 OVERSTORY TREE / 100 L.F. OF FRONTAGE19 UNDERSTORY TREES = 2 UNDERSTORY TREES / 100 L.F. OF FRONTAGE28 SHRUBS = 3 SHRUBS / 100 L.F. OF FRONTAGEBUFFERYARD PROVIDED:11 OVERSTORY TREES(SOUTH SIDE 905 L.F.)4 UNDERSTORY TREES98 SHRUBSLANDSCAPE SUMMARYL100LANDSCAPE PLANNORTHPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.MITCHELL COOKAS, PLA5652201/19/2024DATE:SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALMNLIC. NO.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONLAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024ORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.Description DateMARKET BLVD& W 78TH STNOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMMARKET BLVD& W 78TH STNOTE: SEE SHEET L101 FOR FULL PLANT SCHEDULE364 SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONTAINER CAL/SIZE CONIFEROUS TREE BHS 8 PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA`BLACK HILLS SPRUCE B & B 6` HT. ORNAMENTAL TREE ARM 7 ACER RUBRUM `ARMSTRONG`ARMSTRONG RED MAPLE B & B 2.5" CAL. RVB 3 BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNK B & B 8` HT. OVERSTORY TREE BOL 4 TILIA AMERICANA `BOULEVARD`BOULEVARD LINDEN B & B 2.5" CAL. IHL 7 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. INERMIS `IMPERIAL` IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST B & B 2.5" CAL. SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONTAINER SPACING CONIFEROUS SHRUBS GOJ 6 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL`GREY OWL JUNIPER #5 CONT.4` O.C. SGJ 25 JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN`SEA GREEN JUNIPER #5 CONT.5` O.C. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS ANH 6 HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS `ANNABELLE`ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA #5 CONT.4` O.C. BLC 120 ARONIA MELANOCARPA `IROQUOIS BEAUTY` TM IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT.4` O.C. CB 28 CORNUS SERICEA 'BAILADELINE'FIREDANCE™ RED TWIG DOGWOOD #5 CONT.4` O.C. DBH 39 DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT.3` O.C. DVB 16 VIBURNUM OPULUS `NANUM`DWARF EUROPEAN VIBURNUM #2 CONT.3` O.C. GGD 49 CORNUS HESSEI `GARDEN GLOW`GARDEN GLOW DOGWOOD #5 CONT.5` O.C. GLS 108 RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC #5 CONT.4` O.C. SEM 43 SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA `SEM`SEM FALSESPIREA #5 CONT.3` O.C. ORNAMENTAL GRASSES HMS 106 PANICUM VIRGATUM 'HEAVY METAL'HEAVY METAL SWITCHGRASS #1 CONT.3` O.C. KFG2 84 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT 24" O.C. PERENNIALS BES2 10 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM`BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT.18" O.C. EBP 109 PHLOX SUBULATA 'EMERALD BLUE'EMERALD BLUE CREEPING PHLOX #1 CONT.12" O.C. NW 34 NEPETA X 'WALKER'S LOW'WALKER'S LOW CATMINT #1 CONT.18" O.C. PBS 13 LIATRIS PYCNOSTACHYA PRAIRIE BLAZING STAR #1 CONT.18" O.C. PCF 55 ECHINACEA PURPUREA PURPLE CONEFLOWER #1 CONT.18" O.C. SH4 80 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT.18" O.C. PLANT SCHEDULE DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH NOTES: 2X ROOT BALL WIDTH PREPARED PLANTING BED AND BACKFILL SOIL (THOROUGHLY LOOSENED)NOTES: 1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT. 3. REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 4. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 5. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 6. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 7. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 8. MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST. 1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING. 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. 4. SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6" INTERVALS. 5. BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 6. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 7. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 8. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 9. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 10. FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED ON CENTER SPACINGPER PLANT SCHEDULE. EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH A MINIMUM OF 6" BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. FINISHED GRADE EDGER, AS SPECIFIED TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1011 SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1012 MULCH 3/16" X 5" STEEL EDGER 12" STEEL EDGER SPIKE TURF/SOD SUBGRADE 12" STEEL EDGER SPIKE 3/16" X 5" STEEL EDGER4'MULCH TURF/SOD TOP OF EDGER TO BE FLUSH WITH SOD PLANSECTION STEEL EDGER DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1013 BUILDING, EXTERIOR WALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDING SPECIFIED ROCK MULCH 2' MAINTENANCE STRIP EDGER, AS SPECIFIED SOIL MIX TO BE MINIMUM OF 4" BELOW EDGING TOP TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE LIP FOR MULCH. SPECIFIED SOIL MIX FINISH GRADE FOR LAWN MAINTENANCE STRIP DETAIL SCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L10154"1"PLANTING 1. CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5. PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. INSTALL PLANTS BY PLANT INSTALLATION PERIOD INFORMATION IN THE LATEST STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS FROM MNDOT. PLANTINGS BEFORE OR AFTER THESE DATES ARE DONE AT RISK. 10. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 11. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLARE IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLARE. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLARE SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 12. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 13. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 14. WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 15. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. SOIL 16. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 17. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. MULCH 18. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND NATURAL IN COLOR (DYE-FREE), OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE TRAP ROCK, 1 1/2" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. APPLY PREMENEGRENT HERBICIDE PRIOR TO MULCH PLACEMENT PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS, USE PREEN OR PRE-APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). EDGER 19. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE COL-MET (OR EQUAL) STEEL EDGING; 3/16" THICK x 5" TALL, COLOR BLACK, OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. STEEL EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH TOP OF EDGER AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. WHERE EDGING TERMINATES AT A SIDEWALK, BEVEL OR RECESS ENDS TO PREVENT TRIP HAZARD. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). SEED/SOD 20. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED, PER MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS AND SUPPLIER/MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. IRRIGATION 21. PROVIDE IRRIGATION / PROVIDE NEW SYSTEM, OR MODIFY EXISTING IRRIGATION PER OWNERS DIRECTION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE A RAIN SENSOR AND APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY. 22. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO INCORPORATE WATER REUSE FROM UNDERGROUND STORMWATER SYSTEM - COORDINATE WITH MEP PLANS FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ESTABLISHMENT 23. PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 24. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. WARRANTY 25. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. 26. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, SEED AND OTHER PLANTS UNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION, BUT IN NO CASE, LESS THAN FOLLOWING PERIOD; 1 YEAR AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, SEED AND OTHER PLANTS BY PRUNING, CULTIVATING, AND WEEDING AS REQUIRED FOR HEALTHY GROWTH. RESTORE PLANTING SAUCERS. TIGHTEN AND REPAIR STAKE AND GUY SUPPORTS AND RESET TREES AND SHRUBS TO PROPER GRADES OR VERTICAL POSITION AS REQUIRED. RESTORE OR REPLACE DAMAGED WRAPPINGS. SPRAY AS REQUIRED TO KEEP TREES AND SHRUBS FREE OF INSECTS AND DISEASE. REPLENISH MULCH TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. MAINTAIN LAWNS FOR 60 DAYS AFTER INSTALLING SOD INCLUDING MOWING WHEN SOD RECITES 4” IN HEIGHT. WEED PLANTING BEDS AND MULCH SAUCERS AT MINIMUM ONCE A MONTH DURING THE GROWING SEASON. PROVIDE A MONTHLY REPORT TO THE OWNER ON WEEDING AND OTHER MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. 27. SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING. LANDSCAPE NOTES L101 LANDSCAPE DETAILS ARTIFICIAL TURF DETAIL SCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L1014 NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MITCHELL COOKAS, PLA 5652201/19/2024DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No. Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 365 Page 1 of 22 Project: Chanhassen Market Street Addition (Planning Case 2024-01) Planning Commission Review Date: February 20, 2024 City Council Review Date: April 15, 2024 Drafted By: Eric Maass, AICP, EDFP, Planning Director Staff Report Date: April 10, 2024 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting preliminary plat, site plan, and a variance to the build to zone for the construction of two mixed use buildings totaling 310 market rate apartment units and approximately 14,882 square feet of leasable commercial space. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested preliminary plat, site plan, and variance for the construction of the project as proposed subject to updating of plans based on staff review comments. LOCATION: 591 78th Street W and 570 Market Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 (Subject Property) OWNER: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC 366 South Tenth Avenue, PO Box 727 Waite Park, Mn 56387 Chanhassen Properties, LLC 900 Wayzata Blvd East, Suite 130 PROPOSED MOTIONS: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission approves the requested build to zone variance subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision and recommends approval of the requested preliminary plat and site plan for the construction of two mixed use buildings subject to conditions within the staff report. “The Chanhassen City Council approves the requested preliminary plat and site plan for the construction of two mixed use buildings subject to conditions within the staff report.” 366 Page 2 of 22 Wayzata, MN 55391 CURRENT ZONING: Central Business District (CBD) 2040 LAND USE PLAN: Commercial Land Use / Central Business District ACREAGE: 4.05 acres DENSITY: 76 units/acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city’s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations and zoning ordinance. If it meets these standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The city’s discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with zoning ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the city must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The city’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the zoning ordinance for a variance. The city has a moderate level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. City Code requires that notice of the public hearing be mailed to all property owners within 500 feet (dashed circle). City Staff sent notice to all property owners within 1,000 feet and additional single family residential properties in the general vicinity. 367 Page 3 of 22 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3. Variances Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article 20-XVIII “CBD” Central Business District Chapter 20, Article 20-XXIII, Division 20-XXIII-9 Design Standards for Multifamily Developments ZONING OVERVIEW Zoning Designation The property is zoned Central Business District (CBD). Multifamily housing is a permitted use within the CBD zoning district so long as a portion of the first floor adjacent to 78 th Street West includes commercial space. The project as proposed provid es the required commercial space. Environmental Protection Districts Bluff Creek Corridor - This is not encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Bluff Protection - The proposed project is located outside of the required bluff setback. Floodplain Overlay - The proposed project is located outside of the floodplain. Shoreland Management - The property is outside of the Shoreland Protection District. Wetland Protection - There are no wetlands on the site. PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW The preliminary plat as shown would subdivide the subject property into two lots and two outlots. Lot 1, Block 1 would consist of the westerly mixed-use building. Lot 2, Block 2 would consist of the easterly mixed-use building. Outlot A would be 60.01 feet in width and provide land area necessary for the extension of Laredo Drive. A drainage and utility easement would be placed over the entirety of Outlot A and contain a private underground stormwater retention system. Outlot B would contain a parking lot as well as a dog run area on its surface and a portion of the outlot would also consist of an underground stormwater system. With the reconstruction of Market Boulevard and proposed redevelopment of the Country Inn & Suites, the northwest corner of the plat shows private property extending beyond the curb line and into the intersection of 78th Street West and Market Boulevard. As the final design for Market Boulevard reconstruction proceeds, the preliminary plat shall be updated to dedicate additional public right of way if necessary. Drainage and utility easements should also be updated according to any adjustments to property lines associated with the Market Boulevard road design. The preliminary plat should be updated so that the southeast corner of Outlot A encompasses the roughly 10-foot x 10-foot area directly south of the outlot area so that in the future that area is established as outlot and available for additional road extension. 368 Page 4 of 22 The CBD zoning district does not have a minimum lot area, lot frontage, or lot depth. As a result, the preliminary plat does not require adjustment to meet those aspects of City Code. SITE PLAN REVIEW The developer is requesting site plan approval for two vertical mixed-use buildings. Together the buildings will consist of 553,064 square feet. That building area includes 310 market-rate apartments, 406 structured parking spaces, 14,882 square feet of leasable commercial space, and 18,087 square feet of amenity space as well as a large pool deck on level 2 of the west building. Approximately 46% of units will have at least two bedrooms which is advantageous in attracting both young professionals looking to split rent to make housing more affordable as well empty nesters transitioning into the next stage of their life who don’t want the maintenance responsibility of a traditional home but retain the desire to have a guest bedroom when family or friends visit. The project proposes to construct a sidewalk along the north side of the development where currently no sidewalk exists. This is an important improvement to the city’s downtown pedestrian network. The project also proposes to extend Laredo Drive south of W est 78th Street with sidewalks on both sides of the street extension. This street extension is aligned with the city’s desire to improve the walkability and pedestrian experience within the downtown area. 369 Page 5 of 22 The site is encumbered by cross-access easements over the drive aisles within Outlot B. These cross-access easements restrict the viability of the construction of a building and as a result are shown to be continued as a surface parking lot but with improvements including sidewalks, a pet exercise area, and an underground stormwater management system. The CBD district establishes Character Zones of “Downtown Mixed-Use” and “Downtown West”. The subject property is located within the Downtown Mixed-Use district and as a result, has a “build to zone” off of 78th Street and Market Boulevard of 0’ - 15’ from the property line and a “build to zone” of 0’ – 30’ for building frontage along Laredo Drive. While a majority of both the west and north elevations are within the build to zone, the very southwest corner of the west elevation has a maximum setback distance of 23 feet 6 inches which is the greatest proposed setback that exceeds the build to zone and requires a variance. Parking Typically projects consist of a single “property use”. Those property uses are defined as commercial, residential, office, or industrial uses and City Code establishes minimum parking requirements for those property uses. A vertically mixed-use project presents a unique situation based on varied parking demand between commercial and residential users of the property. City Code Section 20-1124(a)(4) states that for mixed-use buildings, parking requirements shall be determined by the city based on the existing and potential uses of the building. To measure the parking demand, the city contracted with HKGi to conduct a parking study to measure the parking demand that would be generated by the proposed redevelopment with the amount of parking proposed. The project proposes to provide 406 structured parking stalls and access a total of 169 surface parking stalls for a total of 575 parking stalls. The project includes 310 units. The project also shows 14,880sf of commercial space available for lease. Based on the market study completed for this area and the commercial spaces the typical parking ratio is 4 spaces per 1,000sf which would be 60 spaces. The site plan shows 121 parking spaces adjacent to the commercial spaces, 64 of which are structured parking. The site plan shows 457 parking spaces dedicated to residential users. When compared to the 310 total units, the project shows a ratio of 1.5 parking spaces for each of the proposed units. The 1.5 parking spaces per apartment unit ratio is a very typical ratio for suburban multi-family projects. The project proposes to provide surface parking spaces through parking easements over some existing surface parking stalls. City code section 20-1117(c) allows for the city to approve off- site parking if the spaces provide reasonable access from the off-site parking to the use being served, the parking spaces are within 400 feet of a building entrance of the use being served, and is protected by a recorded instrument acceptable to the city. The applicant is proposing that all off-site parking spaces would be within a parking easement which does not restrict the day or time of the parking space availability to the proposed project. 370 Page 6 of 22 Site Furnishing The project as proposed shows the addition of sidewalks around each building where it interfaces with a public right of way or parking area providing strong pedestrian connectivity. Each building shows an area for an outdoor patio to provide street activation and site furnishings including tables and chairs. The applicant has updated the site plan to include two bike racks. Loading, Mechanical, and Refuse Areas Screening of service yards, refuse, and waste-removal areas, loading docks, truck parking areas, and other areas which tend to be unsightly shall be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, dense planting, or any combination of these elements. Screening shal l block views from public right-of-way (pedestrian views) and shall be equally effective in winter and summer. The electrical transformers at the SW corner of the west building shall be screened either through vegetation or fencing. Mechanical equipment shall be sufficiently screened through fencing or landscaping. Lighting Wall-mounted lighting in commercial, industrial, and institutional districts shall be shielded with a total cutoff angle equal to or less than 90 degrees. Fixture height shall not exceed 30 feet. Fixtures are shown at a height of 20 feet which adheres to City Code. Shop drawings shall be provided to show proposed fixtures. Lighting on the building faces shall also be restricted to having a total cutoff angle equal to or less than 90 degrees. Signage The renderings provided depict signage for both the commercial tenant spaces as well as apartment portions. Signage for the project will require separate permits and signage will be reviewed for conformance with City Code at the time of sign permit application. Building Architectural Reviews Required Architectural Standards The city intends that all multifamily developments within the city should strive toward the highest level of quality in both design and construction. Architectural Style City Code states that architectural style shall not be restricted and that the evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and in relationship to its surroundings, guided by the provisions of City Code. Site characteristics to be evaluated for this purpose include building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback, and orientation. Designs that are incompatible with their surroundings or intentionally bizarre or exotic are not acceptable. 371 Page 7 of 22 Monotony of design, both within the projects and between adjacent projects and their surroundings is prohibited. Variation in detail, form, and sitting shall provide visual interest. Site characteristics that may be used for this purpose include building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback, and orientation. All buildings shall have a minimum of 20 percent accent material. Accent material may include brick, stone cut face block, or shakes. The use of any EFIS shall not be on the first story of any building or one story in height. West Building The CBD zoning establishes height requirements for the area. The district allows structures up to six stories in height but also prescribes the total height allowed for each story. The maximum height of a six-story building within the CBD-zoned area is 78 feet. The west building as shown would mostly be 72 feet 4 inches for the portion which would be six stories in height with a maximum height of 76 feet 8 inches when accounting for the areas where the elevator overruns are located. The total height as well as individual floor heights conform to City Code. Requirement Proposed First Floor 14’ to 18’ 15’-16’ Floors 2 through 6 9’ to 12’ 10’8” – 11’8” Total Height Max of 78’0” 76’8” Build To Zone (west/north elevations) 0’ to 15’ 23.6’ * Build To Zone (east elevation) 0’ to 30’ 11.6’ *Requires variance Massing and Placement The proposed structure would occupy nearly all of Lot 1 Block 1 of the proposed preliminary plat as the parking for the project would be entirely structured parking. The building consists of a variety of massing’s including areas that are one story, two stories, five stories, and six stories in height. The stepping back in height along 78th Street West provides necessary relief to the street level to ensure the overhead structure is not overbearing and negatively impacts the pedestrian experience. The same treatment is provided along the western elevation adjacent to Market Boulevard. A ground-level patio space is adjacent to a five-story building span and then the middle of the elevation consists of two stories and then the southern part of the west elevation extends back up to five stories prior to an additional setback before reaching the full six story height. The courtyard at level two that opens to the south currently does not have access to it from internal corridors. The building adheres to the intent of the CBD to create the effect of a traditional downtown area whereby the building is adjacent to the sidewalk and promotes walkability. 372 Page 8 of 22 Proposed Elevations North Elevation (facing 78th St W) East Elevation (facing Laredo Ave extension) West Elevation (facing Market Blvd) 373 Page 9 of 22 South Elevation (facing private property) Interior courtyard elevations 374 Page 10 of 22 Renderings 375 Page 11 of 22 Material and Color The proposed building has a strong variety of materials including two varieties of brick, two varieties of cast stone, metal flashing, architectural precast panels, prefinished metal panels, and fiber cement wall panels. These are all acceptable materials. Applicant to demonstrate that brick occupies at least 20% of the building façade as accent material required by city code. Architectural Interest, Material, and Color North Elevation – The one-story corner commercial spaces in the middle and left sides of the north elevation are marked overhead with sections of vertical brick spans and a strong cornice line. Additionally, the right side of the north elevation drawing showcases a 2 story expanse that includes both a first floor restaurant space and a second floor amenity space. This creates a strong presence for the commercial aspects of the building and quality massing to the structure. South Elevation - Presently the south elevation stories -1 and -2 utilize architectural pre-cast panels. The panels consist of two panel types with each of the panel types alternating. The narrower of the two-panel types includes a windows which provides additional relief to the precast panels. The remaining portions of this elevation contain two types of brick, accent metal, and fiber cement wall. The balance of the elevation has a strong balance between brick expanses on the ends with relief in the form of fiber cement panels in the middle. A mural will be included on the left side of this elevation in the area labeled as “alternate location for public art mural opportunity”. 376 Page 12 of 22 East elevation – The first floor commercial spaces are marked with vertical laid bricks overhead which provides nice articulation between the commercial and residential components of the building. The elevation contains both brick types shown on the building. The left side of the elevation has brick type 1B on floors two, three, and four with the top two stories being fiber cement panel. West elevations – This elevation contains both brick variations as well as some fiber cement panels. Accent metal is used around the windows of the walk-up townhome units as well as the elevator on the south side of the elevation. The elevation shows white awnings over portions of the commercial spaces. The cornice line around the townhome units is broken into two spans which provides a quality balance to the elevation and gives a residential look to this portion of the building. Interior courtyard elevations – The interior courtyard elevations incorporate one color of fiber cement paneling and some brick on the wall elevations which are closest to Market Blvd and visible to the public. Roof Design The buildings shown consist of flat roofs as required by City Code. The massing’s provide a variability to the roof lines providing the desired “step back” appearance desired by the city. East Building The CBD zoning establishes height requirements for the area. The district allows structures up to six stories in height but also prescribes the total height allowed for each story. The maximum height of a six-story building within the CBD zoned area is 78 feet. The east building elevation details are provided in the below table. Requirement Proposed First Floor 14’ to 18’ 14’ Floors 2 through 6 9’ to 12’ 10’8” – 11’8 ‘ Total Height Max of 78’0” 69’2” Build To Zone (west elevation) 0’ to 30’ 9.0’ Massing and Placement The proposed structure would occupy nearly all of Lot 1 Block 2 of the proposed preliminary plat as the majority of the parking for the project would be entirely structured parking. Surface parking in front of Lot 1 Block 2 is also proposed and shown as Outlot B on the proposed plat as well as additional surface parking to the south of the proposed building in existing surface parking stalls through an existing easement. The building consists of a variety of massing’s including areas that are 1 story and 5 stories in height on the north elevation. Due to the changes in elevation north to south across the site, parking that is underground on the north side of the site is exposed on the south end. The 377 Page 13 of 22 proposed building fronts on the extension of Laredo Drive. The north side of the building has two single story commercial spaces as well as a leasing office. A ground level patio space is adjacent to the commercial space on the west side of the building. The building provides for adequate pedestrian circulation both adjacent to the adjacent roadway as well as internal to the site. The building adheres to the intent of the CBD to create the effect of a traditional downtown area whereby the building is adjacent to Laredo Drive and promotes walkability through sidewalks throughout the site. Architectural Interest, Material, and Color The façade has a variety of massing’s including a first floor that consists of commercial spaces and a leasing office for the apartment portions of the building. The building then has a step back to the north elevation prior to the building going up an additional four stories. The north elevation is covered almost entirely with brick as the most prominent façade visible from W 78th street. The east and west elevations consist of both brick colors and have complimentary fiber cement paneling in three colors. The west elevation has greater public visibility and as a result the south end of that elevation has greater undulation to provide architectural interest. The south elevation has two stories of brick below four stories of a light gray fiber cement panel. The building has hanging balconies which consist of black picket style railings which provide a clean and modern look to the balconies. North Elevation (facing W 78th St) South Elevation facing Market St) 378 Page 14 of 22 East elevation (facing private property) West elevation (facing private property) Material and Color The proposed building has a large variety of materials including two varieties of brick, two colors of precast architectural panels, four colors of fiber cement panel, and a metal horizontal accent panel. These are all acceptable materials. Applicant to demonstrate that brick occupies at least 20% of the building façade as accent material required by city code. 379 Page 15 of 22 Renderings 380 Page 16 of 22 Architectural Style North Elevation – The elevation has been revised so that the first level commercial space is more prominent with a more pronounced cornice line and the elevation is almost entirely covered with a brick material giving it a high end look from W 78 th street. South Elevation – This elevation consists of both varieties of brick, two colors of fiber cement panel and the horizontal access panel. Floors minus one and one consist of leasable apartment units are comprised of brick with the upper four stories being a fiber cement panel. East elevation – The elevation contains both varieties of brick and all colors of fiber cement wall panels in addition to both gray and dark gray precast wall panels. Both brick materials are shown on the south end of this elevation near a garage entrance. West elevation – The elevation contains varieties of brick, precast architectural panels, and three colors of fiber cement panels. It has a step back in height along the north end of the elevation above the leasable commercial/patio space as well as articulation on the south end that provides relief to the roof line. Roof Design The buildings shown consist of flat roofs as required by City Code. The massing’s provide a variability to the roof lines primarily along the north elevation with some undulation in the roof line occurring on the south ends of the west elevation. Variance Request – Exceeding “Build To Zone” As noted in the site plan review section above, two portions of the proposed western building exceed the build to zone established by the city’s zoning district. The city’s zoning code establishes the criteria for granting variances which are based on state statutes. The following criteria must all be met in order to grant a variance. 1. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. The purpose of the build to zone is to encourage a more traditional main street character of development that provides for activation of the sidewalk and accompanying streetscape. The vast majority of the west building is within the build to zone required by City Code and as proposed the structure is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the chapter and is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 2. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted b y 381 Page 17 of 22 this chapter. Practical difficulties include but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The proposed use of a vertical mixed-use building with ground-floor commercial space and apartments above is permitted and therefore a reasonable use of the property. An overwhelming majority of the proposed western building adheres to the build to zone requirement with the two areas that do not adhere to the build to zone resulting from the curvature of the adjacent roadway. The project as proposed creates the desired walkable environment with commercial and residential uses in close proximity to the sidewalk. 3. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. The variance is based solely on practical difficulties related to the adjacent curvature of the roadway and is not based on economic considerations. 4. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The curvature of Market Boulevard and the intersection of Market Boulevard and 78 th Street West creates a unique circumstance unique to the property which is not created by the landowner. 5. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The intent of the “CBD” district is to provide for a concentration of specialized goods and services, commercial and office spaces including cultural, entertainment, finance, restaurants, retail, and multi-family development that are accessible and in conformance with the downtown redevelopment plan, goals and objectives. The proposed project meets the intent of the CBD zoning. 6. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in M.S. § 216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The proposed project does not include an earth-sheltered construction project and therefore is not applicable. Staff recommends approval of the requested variance subject to the conditions of approval and the attached findings of fact and decision. Staff Comments Requiring Plan Set Updating Planning Department: 1. Provide shop drawings of proposed pole-mounted light fixtures as well as proposed wall-mounted lighting fixtures. Fixtures shall not be mounted more than 30 feet in the air and shall have a maximum cut-off angle of 90 degrees. 382 Page 18 of 22 2. Parking a. Parking easement between Chanhassen Frontier LLC and the applicant shall be amended to remove the restriction on overnight parking and that easement shall encompass a total of 75 parking spaces and their associated drive aisles. 3. Preliminary Plat a. The preliminary plat should be updated so that the southeast corner of Outlot A encompasses the roughly 10-foot x 10-foot area directly south of the outlot area so that in the future that area is established as outlot and available for additional road extension. 4. Site Plan a. The electrical transformers of the west and east buildings shall be screened either through vegetation or fencing. b. Site plan notes “future curb by others”. With the removals on both the north and south side of 78th Street West, the development project will have to replace the pavement, curb, and lane striping in the areas where removals are taking place. 5. West Building Architecture a. Verify exterior facades contain at least 20% accent material of brick or stone. 6. East Building Architecture a. Verify exterior facades contain at least 20% accent material of brick or stone. Forestry Department 1. The current landscape must be updated to meet the city’s species diversity requirements where no more than ten percent of the trees may be from any one tree species, no more than 20 percent of the trees may be from any one genus and no more than 30 percent of trees from any one family. 2. Applicant must include a list of the existing landscape material. This shall be in the form of a tree survey where the species, DBH, size, condition and location of all trees and any damaged or diseased trees on site. All trees shall be tagged and identified by number on the survey. 3. Applicant should better utilize the area along Market Blvd for planting of trees nearer the sidewalk and revise accordingly around the walk-up townhome entrances in that area. 4. Landscape plan shows tree plantings in confined spaces. To maximize viability potential, prioritize overstory planting spacing of at least 15 feet and spacing of at least 12.5 feet between ornamental trees. 5. The landscape plan shows eight black hills spruce where the future Laredo Dr ive will extend. The city recommends only planting four trees in that area. Plantings should not inhibit visibility to the potential mural on the adjacent wall. 383 Page 19 of 22 6. Note that there are no calls for any roof-top or courtyard plantings (think trees in raised planters like along Nicollet Blvd in downtown Minneapolis). If designed to accommodate trees in these areas, we would give credit towards other required plantings. 7. During one of the meetings with the design team, we requested implementation of Silva Cells (or similar technology) to improve the rooting ability for plantings. In particular, we mentioned the entrances to residences along Market Boulevard and along the sidewalk on Laredo. Engineering Department 1. The Developer shall vacate all previously recorded public easements no longer necessary due to the relocation and or removal of public utilities associated with the redevelopment prior to recording of the final plat. 2. The Developer shall provide all access agreements and temporary easements necessary to access and work on any abutting properties prior to the city issuing a Notice to Proceed for construction operations. 3. The Developer shall enter into Encroachment Agreements for private improvements located within a public easement and recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The Developer shall deed Outlot A to the city for future public access needs in association with the extension of Laredo Drive to the south. 5. The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining Outlot A until such time that Laredo Drive is connected to Market Street to the south. 6. In an effort to promote collaboration and sequencing of necessary improvements between the development and on-going public improvements in the downtown corridor, the Developer shall: a. keep the city promptly informed of all project schedules and any changes that may affect either party to the fullest extent feasible. b. invite representatives from the city to participate in all preconstruction meetings to facilitate coordination and address potential concerns. c. ensure the city's participation in weekly construction meetings, allowing for ongoing collaboration and coordination of construction schedules. 7. The Developer shall provide engineered plans which illustrate the impacts (e.g. centerline grades, grading extents, etc.) necessary to facilitate the Laredo Drive extension to the south with the final plat submittal. 8. Final geotechnical and environmental assessment reports shall be provided with the final plat submittal. 384 Page 20 of 22 9. The Developer shall provide updated trip generation assignments based on the proposed development and verify no substantial changes from the 2023 Downtown Chanhassen Traffic Study with the final plat submittal. a. If based on the updated trip generation assignments there is a substantial change in the capacity analysis, such as a drop in level of service at any intersection within the study area or a needed change in lane capacity, the Developer must provide an update to the Downtown Chanhassen Traffic Study. Improvements necessary to facilitate the development’s need will be the responsibility of the Developer. 10. The Developer and their Engineer shall work with city staff in amending the construction plans, dated January 19, 2024, prepared by Michael C. Brandt, PE with Kimly-Horn and Associates, Inc., to fully satisfy construction plan comments and concerns attached to the Staff Report dated February 26, 2024. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff prior to recording of the final plat. 11. The Developer shall provide a sanitary sewerage capacity analysis verifying that the existing sanitary sewer mains have adequate capacity to convey flows with the final plat submittal. 12. Construction design elements associated with the street plans such as stationing, curb tables and alignments, centerline grades, and intersection details will be required with the final plat submittal. 13. The Developer shall incorporate warranted crosswalk enhancements at the intersection of Laredo Drive and West 78th Street per the City’s Crosswalk Policy with the final plat submittal. 14. All sanitary sewer and water mains will be publicly owned and maintained after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 15. The applicant will be required to enter into a Development Contract with the city and all applicable securities and fees provided prior to recording of the final plat. 16. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, MnDOT, Carver County, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD), Board of Water and Soil Resources, MPCA, etc.). Water Resources Department: 1. The applicant shall provide a copy of conditional approval from the RPBCWD as part of any future plan submittals. 385 Page 21 of 22 2. The applicant shall update the models (HydroCAD and MIDS) per city and any watershed district comments and submit updated computations and models in their native forms with the final plat submittal. 3. The applicant shall provide additional information to determine the access agreements and easements required to install and connect to storm sewer systems on adjacent properties which are not publicly owned. 4. The applicant shall provide additional information on the proposed BMPs (Best Management Practices) such as water reuse, ADS Bay Filters, green roof, tree trenches, etc. to confirm modeling matches the proposed plan as part of any future plan submittals. 5. Prior to the final plat submittal, the applicant shall work with staff to revise and optimize the design of the storm sewer system that would be public in a future condition. An underground BMP located within future Right of Way (ROW) or easement will only be allowed if approved by the City Engineer. 6. Additional details on the proposed building elevation shall be provided with future plan submittals to confirm the site is meeting the City’s freeboard requirements. 7. The applicant shall enter into an Operations and Maintenance Agreement for all proposed privately owned stormwater facilities which shall be recorded concurrently with the final plat. Building Department: 1. A demolition permit must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site, each demolition site address will require separate permits. 2. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 3. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 5. A SAC determination letter must be provided to the city prior to building permits being issued. 6. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 7. The building is required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. 386 Page 22 of 22 8. Structure proximity to property lines (and other buildings) will have an impact on the code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to; allowable size, protected openings and fire-resistive construction. These requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. 9. Building plans must include a code analysis that contains the following information: Key Plan, Occupancy group, Type of construction, Allowable height and area, Fire sprinklers, Separated or non-separated, Fire resistive elements (Ext walls, Bearing walls - exterior or interior, Shaft, Incidental use), Occupant load, Exits required (Common path, Travel distance), Minimum plumbing fixture count. 10. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high, measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. Retaining walls (if present) under four feet in height require a zoning permit. 11. Accessibility will have to be provided to all portions of the development and a percentage of the units may also be required to be accessible or adaptable in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. Fire Department: 1. The fire department requests that if the project is approved, that prior to the demolition of existing buildings that the Applicant provide the city’s fire department the opportunity to conduct some training exercises in the buildings. 387 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION IN RE: Application of Market Street Station requesting Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review. On February 20, 2024, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Market Street Station for preliminary plat, build to zone variance, and site plan review. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed preliminary plat, build to zone variance, and site plan review was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and approved the requested build to zone variance and recommended approval of the preliminary plat, and site plan review based upon the city ordinances in effect at the time. On March 11, 2024, the Chanhassen City Council met at its scheduled meeting to consider the applications referenced above and tabled the applications to April 15th, 2024 and requested work session meetings to refine the project architecture to be held on March 18th, 2024 and March 25, 2024. On April 15th, 2024, the Chanhassen City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the applications referenced above and makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. On January 19, 2024, the City received a land use application for property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Bloomberg 2nd Addition, except that part contained within the plat of Frontier Cinema Addition, and Lot 1 Block 1, Bloomberg Addition and Outlots A and B, Bloomberg Addition, and Lot 2 Block 1, Bloomberg 2nd Addition, Except the west 90.00 feet of the south 13.50 feet thereof; and further excepting the East 60.00 feet of the West 150.00 feet of the South 3.50 feet thereof, and Lot 1 Block 1, Frontier Cinema Addition, and a portion of Lot 1 Block 1 Market Street Station (“Property”) for the following: A. A variance to the required build to zone for the western most building. B. A preliminary plat application for a 2 lot subdivision for Market Street Station; C. A site plan review for the construction of two vertical mixed use buildings prepared by ESG Architecture & Design, and Kimley Horn dated January 19, 2024 388 2. The property is currently zoned Central Business District. 3. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Commercial; Central Business District Category. Preliminary Plat Request 5. The subdivision ordinance directs the City to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) effects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance including the Central Business District lot standards; Finding: The proposed subdivision proposes lots which adheres to the minimum requirements required by the Central Business District zoning standards. b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision as shown complies with the city’s comprehensive plan as well as applicable city plans c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: Based upon plans submitted to the city, the site characteristics including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, erosion and flooding susceptibility and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by the subdivision ordinance, Chapter 18, and Water, Sewers and Sewage Disposal, Chapter 19; Finding: The subdivision as proposed has adequate provisions for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by chapter 18, subdivision ordinance, and Water, Sewers, and Sewage Disposal outlined in chapter 19. e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not have adverse impacts causing significant environmental damage. 389 f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and Finding: The proposed subdivision does not create conflicts with existing easements of record. g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: i. Lack of adequate stormwater drainage, which are available and being installed with the development. ii. Lack of adequate roads. Access is to an existing, collector public street iii. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems, which is available to the development. iv. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision is not premature as it provides adequate stormwater drainage, adequate accessibility and availability of roads and sanitary sewer systems to the development as well as off-site support systems. Site Plan Request 6. Applicant has requested approval of the site plan dated January 19, 2024 prepared by Kimley Horn and ESG Architecture & Design. 7. The zoning ordinance directs the City to consider nine possible adverse effects of the proposed site plan. The nine (9) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) Is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted. Finding: The site plan is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, comprehensive plan, and official road mapping. b) Is consistent with the site plan review requirements. Finding: The site plan is consistent with the site plan review requirements. c) Preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas. Finding: The existing site is not in a natural state currently that requires preservation as it is currently a fully developed site consisting of multiple commercial businesses and associated parking lots. 390 d) Creation of a harmonious relationship of buildings and open spaces with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development. Finding: The proposed design creates a harmonious relationship between existing buildings that shall remain, natural site features, and proposed landscaping. e) Creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: i. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; ii. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; iii. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and iv. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. Finding: The proposed site plan does create an internal sense of order for the buildings and uses on the site through the balance of landscaping, material applications, and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles. f) Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The site plan as proposed does protect adjacent and neighboring properties for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air that could have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. g) Within the Highway Corridor (HC) districts, consistency with the purpose, intent and standards of the HC districts. Finding: The proposed site plan is not within the Highway Corridor District. h) Within the Bluff Creek Overlay (BCO) district, consistency with the purpose, intent and standards of the BCO district. Finding: The proposed site plan is not within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. 391 i) Maintain an acceptable road system level of service. Finding: The proposed plan does not affect the road system level of service and internally in the site improves upon items that could affect the road system, such as parking and pedestrian circulation. 8. The staff report presented to City Council on April 15th, 2024, and prepared by Eric Maass is incorporated herein. DECISION The City Council approves the proposed rezoning, preliminary plat, and site plan review based on the findings of fact included herein, and subject to the conditions of the staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this _____ day of _____________, 202_. CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL BY:___________________________________ Its Mayor BY:_ __________________________________ Its City Manager 392 Page 1 of 4 Proposed Chanhassen Cinema and Hotel Redevelopment Project FAQ – Updated April 10, 2024 Throughout the application review process, the city has gathered public comment and questions about the proposed redevelopment. The following FAQ represents the most commonly asked questions and provides information responding to them. 1. This is the first I have heard about this project. What did the city do to get the word out? Communication is a strategic priority for the city. The project was first introduced in July 2023 through various channels, including email, social media, mailings, and the Chanhassen Villager. For a comprehensive overview, please refer to the communication packet. 2. What will the traffic be like? / Traffic in this area is already challenging This concern has been on the city’s radar even without the proposed redevelopment. The city is reconstructing Market Blvd in 2025 and that project includes improvements that will make exiting nearby developments onto Market Blvd safer and more accessible. A traffic study showed that with the project, intersections and turning movements will operate at acceptable levels of service in the AM and PM peak hours. Traffic from the project will be dispersed from multiple access points. The east building will mainly utilize Market Street to the south of the development in order to access Market Blvd. to the west or Great Plains Blvd. to the east. The west building will mainly access W. 78th Street. 3. What will happen to the Prince mural? The developer explored preserving the mural, but due to the state of the building and the mural being directly on the bricks, were not able to. The city does not have any legal authority to require preservation of the mural. The developer has identified a location on the new building to recreate a mural of the same scale. 4. Tell me more about the proposed Laredo Drive Extension? The extension aligns with the city's goal of creating walkable blocks. It provides pedestrian access to Market Street Station (Med Box Grille, Spalon Montage, etc.) and other 393 Page 2 of 4 businesses to the south. The continued roadway connection to Market Street Station is shown as an option for the future. Kraus-Anderson, the property owner of Market Street Station, does not have near-term plans to redevelop. The public roadway connection is shown as an option for the future. 5. Does this proposed development cause an increased need of fire trucks or fire staff? No, this specific development will not increase the need for fire trucks or staff. The City has anticipated growth figures for employment, households, and population within the city’s comprehensive plan, which is the basis for city growth. This proposed project is within those already anticipated growth figures. The city currently has ten full-time firefighters and twenty-six paid-on-call firefighters who provide a high level of service, responding to over 1,200 calls per year with an average response time of 6.5 minutes. 6. The project proposes 310 apartment units and approximately 14,880 square feet of commercial space. Is there enough parking proposed to support those figures? The project has access to a total of 575 parking spaces which includes 406 structured parking stalls. There are a total of 121 parking spaces, 64 of which are structured parking open to the public to support the leasable commercial spaces. This leaves 454 parking spaces reserved for residential tenants in the 310 apartments. This equates to an average of 1.5 parking spaces for every apartment unit. The city reviewed parking ratios for similar projects, considered a commercial market study that analyzed commercial parking, and an overall parking study to review the project and proposed parking, and based on the analysis of those pieces of information found that the proposed parking was adequate to meet parking demand. The same process was followed for The Venue/Aldi project. The city has not experienced parking issues from that project. 7. The two apartment buildings and commercial spaces will require both water and sewer services. How does the city ensure that the city’s utility system has the capacity to serve the project? As part of the plan review process the city’s engineering team assesses utility capacities to ensure adequate capacity to serve what is being proposed. The sewer and water infrastructure downtown was planned to accommodate these types of uses/densities. There is adequate sewer and water infrastructure to service the proposed development. 8. How does the city evaluate the proposed landscaping plan and the species of plants being proposed? The city's environmental resources specialist and forestry consultant review and approve all proposed planting plans during the entitlement and plan review process to ensure they meet or exceed city requirements and will be viable. 394 Page 3 of 4 9. The developer proposes providing a small percentage of electric vehicle charging stations with the project. How does the city review proposed electrical vehicle charging proposals? The city doesn't mandate a specific percentage of parking stalls with EV chargers. Charging stations are the decisions of private property owners based on current and predicted market demand. The fire marshal reviews plans for compliance with building and fire codes. 10. What is TIF Financing, and why does this project need it? Tax Increment Financing allows a project that would not otherwise be financially viable to be built, often with the intent of spurring redevelopment. The current property taxes paid today by each property in the TIF District are frozen and continue to be paid to the School District, County, City, etc. A percentage of the increased property taxes are rebated to the developer for up to 16 years. TIF payments are pay-as-you-go, and the developer only receives the rebate payments on taxes paid by the property. Once the TIF note is repaid, the increased property taxes are paid to the School District, County, City, etc. TIF allows for local taxing bodies to make a joint investment in the development or redevelopment of an area, with the intent that any short-term gains be reinvested and leveraged so that all taxing bodies will receive larger financial gains in the future. 11. Is Roers Company a reputable developer? I’ve heard they had to pay tenants to break leases in a Milwaukee project? Roers Companies had a development project in Milwaukee Wisconsin that involved repurposing a Briggs & Stratton manufacturing building originally constructed in 1906 where prior uses created environmental issues that weren’t able to be resolved. The developer has completed their due diligence in assessing the environmental conditions of the site in Chanhassen. Roers Companies has completed or is in progress with multifamily residential projects throughout the metro area, including West St. Paul, Lakeville, St. Louis Park, Fridley, Blaine, Shakopee, Minnetonka, and Victoria. 12. I’m still concerned about traffic. Tell me more about what has been done to study this. The project completed a traffic impact assessment in addition to a city-contracted downtown traffic study. The study indicates minimal impact on the operations of the roadway network, with anticipated acceptable levels of service during peak hours. The site is anticipated to generate 3,015 daily trips, including 259 AM peak hour 395 Page 4 of 4 trips (105 entering and 154 exiting) and 257 PM peak hour trips (157 entering and 100 exiting). This trip generation estimate should be considered extremely conservative (estimating high) because it was assumed all retail/restaurant space was occupied by a highly trip-intensive land use (high turnover sit-down restaurant). Less trip-intensive uses will likely occupy some portion of this retail restaurant space. The traffic model estimate was also not offset by trips from existing site uses. The site will utilize two access points (both existing), a primary access at 78th Street & Laredo Drive, and a secondary access to Market Street through connected parking lots. A capacity analysis was performed for Existing Year (2023), Future Year (2045) No-Build, and Future Year (2045) Build conditions. In all scenarios, it determined that study intersections and movements adjacent to the proposed project are anticipated to operate at acceptable levels of service during all hours, including in the AM and PM peak hours. 396 Page 1 of 1Date:1/10/2024DISCLAIMER: Based on the information provided, all dimensions and luminaire locationsshown represent recommended positions. Actual performance of any manufacturer's luminairesmay vary due to changes in electrical voltage, tolerance in LEDs and othervariable field conditions. Calculations do not include obstructions such as buildings,curbs, landscaping or any other architectural elements unless noted.Fixture nomenclature to be finalized by engineer and/or architect.This drawings is for photometric evaluation purposes only andshould not be used as a construction document or as a final documentfor ordering product.Designed By: K. TomczakChanhassen ApartmentsChecked By: Rob ChasséScale: 1" = 25'Luminaire ScheduleSymbolQtyCalculation SummaryLabelUnitsAvgLabelMountingHeightLum. WattsLLFDescription2MaxMinAvg/MinP12054.1290.900OPF-S-A02-740-T4MMax/MinParking Lot #1Fc1.444.31P20.52090.680.900OPF-S-A04-740-T5W2.888.601P32063.590.900OPF-S-A03-740-T4M3P4Roadway2041.880.900OPF-S-A01-740-T2MFc1.233.30.26.1516.50SETSETSETSET ACCESSACCESSRETAIL PARKING2,309 SFTERRACE7,674 SFAMENITY1,990 SFRETAIL248 SFRRACEFE2,992 SFNO PARKINGHCCEECHHCCEEHHHHEEEEHHDDSTSTSTSTCONCRETE RAMP / LOADING DOCKSSSTP1P1P2P3P4P4P40.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.60.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.10.6 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.0 1.7 0.60.7 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.1 2.0 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.4 2.2 3.2 3.2 1.00.8 1.0 1.6 2.2 2.4 2.4 1.9 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.7 3.0 4.0 4.3 1.40.8 1.1 1.6 2.2 2.4 2.3 1.8 1.2 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.7 2.9 4.0 4.3 1.40.7 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.1 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.5 2.3 3.2 3.2 1.00.7 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.2 1.7 2.1 1.8 0.70.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.1 0.60.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.3 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.60.8 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.71.5 2.1 2.6 2.1 1.7 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.3 2.6 2.0 1.4 0.91.9 2.9 3.7 3.1 2.3 1.6 1.1 1.2 1.6 2.4 3.2 3.6 2.9 1.8 1.11.8 3.2 3.9 3.6 2.4 1.3 0.9 0.9 1.3 2.4 3.6 3.8 3.1 1.7 0.92.2 3.1 2.7 1.5 0.6 0.21.4 2.8 2.1 1.2 0.6 0.21.1 1.7 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.20.7 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.20.6 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.20.5 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.20.7 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.31.0 1.7 1.5 1.1 0.7 0.41.4 2.7 2.2 1.4 0.9 0.52.2 3.3 2.8 1.7 1.0 0.61.7 3.1 2.6 1.6 0.9 0.61.3 2.2 1.9 1.3 0.9 0.60.9 1.4 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.70.7 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.80.6 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.80.8 1.2 1.3 1.1 0.81.1 1.9 1.7 1.2 0.91.5 2.9 2.3 1.5 1.02.3 3.2 2.9 1.7 1.01.6 2.9 2.4 1.5 0.91.1 1.9 1.6 1.1 0.80.7 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.60.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.4 397 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CHANHASSEN APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Prepared for: Roers Companies Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 767 N Eustis Street Suit 100 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55114 MARCH 2024 398 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CHANHASSEN APARTMENTS CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA REPORT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ________________________ March 7, 2024 Tim Klockziem, P.E. Date License No. 58860 399 3 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................... 4 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................ 4 Existing Roadways ........................................................................................................................... 4 Existing Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................................... 4 Background Growth .......................................................................................................................... 5 Planned Transportation Projects ....................................................................................................... 5 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT...................................................................................................................... 6 Site Trip Generation.......................................................................................................................... 6 Site Trip Distribution ......................................................................................................................... 6 Site Accesses and Assignment ......................................................................................................... 7 CAPACITY ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................... 7 Existing Year (2023) Conditions ........................................................................................................ 8 Future Year (2045) No-Build Conditions ............................................................................................ 9 Future Year (2045) Build Conditions ............................................................................................... 11 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................ 12 APPENDIX............................................................................................................................................ 12 LIST OF APPENDICES A.Exhibits B.Turning Movement Counts C.Proposed Development Layout Exhibit D.Market Boulevard Corridor Future Layout Exhibit E.SimTraffic Analysis Results 400 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 4 INTRODUCTION Roers Companies is proposing a mid-rise multifamily housing development for the southeast quadrant of the W 78th Street & Market Boulevard intersection. The site would be redeveloped into approximately 310 residential units and approximately 15,000 square feet of restaurant and retail space. The site is currently occupied by a hotel and unoccupied strip retail space. Exhibit 1 shows the proposed project location. All exhibits are included in Appendix A. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS The proposed development is located the southeast quadrant of the W 78th Street & Market Boulevard intersection. The following intersections were included in the traffic capacity analysis: • W 78th Street & Market Boulevard (Traffic Signal) • Market Boulevard & Market Square North Driveway (Side Street Stop) • Market Boulevard & Market Street (Side Street Stop) • W 78th Street & Laredo Drive (Traffic Signal) • Great Plains Blvd & Market Street (Side Street Stop) The study intersections listed above are shown in Exhibit 1. EXISTING ROADWAYS The proposed development will utilize the existing access points on W 78th Street, Market Boulevard and Market Street. The following are brief summaries of the existing study roadways. Market Boulevard is classified as an Urban Major Collector. Market Boulevard is generally a four-lane undivided roadway near the project site which runs north-south. According to data from the MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application, the Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) was 12,800 vehicles per day (vpd) between W 78th Street and TH 5 in 2021. The posted speed limit on Market Boulevard is 30 mph. Market Boulevard is programmed for reconstruction in 2025. W 78th Street is classified as an Urban Major Collector. W 78th Street is a four-lane, divided roadway with dedicated left turn lanes throughout the study area. According to the MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application, the AADT was 10,000 vehicles per day (vpd) between Great Plains Boulevard and Kerber Boulevard in 2021. The posted speed limit on W 78th Street is 30 mph. Market Street is a two-lane undivided roadway which runs east-west and provides access to businesses to the north. The roadway is classified as a local roadway; no AADT data is available. Exhibit 2 provides the existing intersection geometry and intersection control for the study intersections. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Turning movement counts at all study intersections were recently collected by Kimley-Horn as part of the Traffic Study regarding the Market Boulevard Corridor. Existing turning movement counts were collected at the study intersections on Monday, May 22nd and Wednesday, May 24th, 2023. The count data included vehicles, as well as bicycles and pedestrians. 401 5 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 The AM peak hour for this study was determined to be 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM and the PM peak hour 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM. Exhibit 3 provides the AM and PM peak hour vehicle turning movement volumes for Existing (2023) Conditions. The existing traffic count data is attached in Appendix B. BACKGROUND GROWTH Future traffic was projected through the study area to estimate peak hour traffic at study intersections for the Design Year (2045) without the proposed development at the study site. Future traffic forecasts consist of two main components: background growth and traffic from other planned developments. Background growth associated with local and regional population and employment increases was determined using projections from the City of Chanhassen and Carver County 2040 Transportation Plans. The annual growth rates along Market Boulevard and W 78th Street are forecasted to vary between 0 and 0.6 percent. Based on these forecasted traffic volumes, a 0.5% growth rate is recommended for Market Boulevard and W 78th Street. Two other nearby developments are anticipated to have an effect on the future volumes within the study area: 1. Near the Great Plains Boulevard & Market Street intersection, there is an existing parking garage that was a park-and-ride lot for SouthWest Transit. This park-and-ride lot is no longer served by regular transit service. This site may be repurposed at some point in the future. For the purposes of this study, it was assumed that the lot would be redeveloped into a land use like other recent redevelopment sites in Downtown Chanhassen. The trip generation of a potential redevelopment of this site was estimated using the trip generation rates for 200 units of mid-rise multifamily housing and 6,000 square feet of retail/restaurant space. The site trip distribution for this development is shown in Exhibit 4 and the total trip assignment for this development is shown in Exhibit 5. 2. The City of Chanhassen has proposed a concept for a civic campus adjacent to City Hall. This plan includes the addition of a park, recreational areas, a performance space, and a new City Hall building which will include a senior center. The entering and exiting volumes on the north leg of the W 78th Street and Market Boulevard intersection have been increased by 10% in addition to the background growth to account for the increased volume due to redevelopment of this site. Additional traffic anticipated for this development is shown in Exhibit 6. These annual growth rates and the trips generated by other developments were applied to Existing (2023) traffic volumes to develop the Future Year (2045) traffic volumes. Exhibit 7 shows the Future Year No- Build (2045) turning movement volumes. PLANNED TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS The city has a programmed project to reconstruct Market Boulevard from TH 5 to Chan View. This reconstruction project is expected to change the intersection geometry at several study intersections. It is expected that the intersection of Market Boulevard & Market Square North Driveway is reconstructed as a mini-roundabout. The intersection of Market Boulevard & Market Street is expected to be converted from a full access intersection to a ¾ access intersection, which will restrict minor street left turn movements. The lane configuration of the W 78th Street & Market Boulevard intersection is also expected to be modified. This project is still in the preliminary design phase and multiple design alternatives are still being evaluated. The most recent available layout of the most likely preferred alternative is included in Appendix D. The modifications associated with the Market Boulevard Improvement Project are included in the No Build and the Build Conditions operations analysis. The lane geometry for future scenarios is illustrated in Exhibit 8. 402 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 6 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE TRIP GENERATION The trip-generating potential of the proposed development was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition. Standard ITE trip rates were used to develop the anticipated total trips generated by the site. The site is proposed to be redeveloped into two residential buildings with ground floor retail space, totaling up to 310 residential units and up to 15,000 square feet of restaurant and retail space. The average rate for ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 221 (Multifamily Housing Mid-Rise) was used to estimate trips generation potential of the residential units. ITE LUC 932 (High Turnover Sit-Down Restaurant) was used to calculate the trip generation potential of the restaurant and retail space. Specific uses for the retail space are not yet known. The trip generation potential for High Turnover Sit-Down restaurant is higher than most typical retail uses and thus represents a conservative estimate of the trip generation for the restaurant/retail portion of the site. Table 1 provides a summary of the number of trips anticipated to be generated during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. As shown, the site is anticipated to generate 259 new trips during the AM peak hour (105 entering, 154 exiting) and 257 new trips during the PM peak hour (157 entering, 100 exiting). The trip generation estimate for the proposed development was not adjusted for pass-by trips, internal capture on the site, or offset by trips generated by the existing land uses. Table 1 – Site Trip Generation SITE TRIP DISTRIBUTION The site trips were distributed to the adjacent roadways based on the current traffic patterns in the area and a general assessment of the major regional roadways surrounding the study area. In general, the following global trip distribution was assumed for the development: • 25-30% to/from the east via TH 5 • 10-15% to/from the east via W 78th Street • 20-30% to/from the west via W 78th Street • 30-40% to/from the South via Market Boulevard Land Use Description Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Housing Mid Rise (LUC 221) 310 Units 1,407 26 89 115 74 47 121 High Turnover Sit-Down Restaurant (LUC 932) 15,000 SF 1,608 79 65 144 83 53 136 Total Site Generated Trips (Unadjusted) 3,015 105 154 259 157 100 257 403 7 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 SITE ACCESSES AND ASSIGNMENT The proposed site will have two (2) accesses. The primary access to the site will be located at W 78th Street & Laredo Drive. It is assumed that this access will be utilized primarily by residents of the building on the west portion of the site and all restaurant/retail trips as it is closest to the access to parking for this building and all the retail portions to the site. There will be secondary access to Market Street via connected parking lots south of the proposed development. It is assumed that residents of the building on the east portion of the site will utilize Market Street as it closest to the entrance to the resident parking for this building. The proposed site plan is included in Appendix C. The site trip distribution and assignment associated with the retail space and west building residential space are illustrated in Exhibit 9 and Exhibit 10. The site trip distribution and assignment associated with the east building residential and retail space are illustrated in Exhibit 11 and Exhibit 12. CAPACITY ANALYSIS A capacity analysis was performed to quantify the delay and level of service at the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The capacity analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic except for roundabouts, which were analyzed using the roundabout analysis software Rodel with an 85% confidence interval. Existing signal timings used in the analysis unless otherwise noted. The capacity of an intersection quantifies its ability to accommodate traffic volumes and is measured in average delay per vehicle. It is expressed in terms of level of service (LOS) which ranges from A to F, with LOS A as the highest (best traffic flow and least delay), LOS E as saturated or at-capacity conditions, and LOS F as the lowest (oversaturated conditions). The LOS grades shown below, which are provided in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), quantify and categorize the driver’s discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and travel times experienced as a result of intersection control and the resulting traffic queuing. A detailed description of each LOS rating can be found in Table 2. The range of control delay for each rating (as detailed in the HCM) is also shown in Table 2. Because signalized intersections are expected to carry a larger volume of vehicles and stopping is required during red time, higher delays are tolerated for the corresponding LOS ratings. 404 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 8 Table 2 – Level of Service Information Level of Service Average Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) Description A 0-10 (Unsignalized); 0-10 (Signalized) Minimal control delay; traffic operates at primarily free-flow conditions; unimpeded movement within traffic stream. B >10-15 (Unsignalized); >10-20 (Signalized) Minor control delay at signalized intersections; traffic operates at a fairly unimpeded level with slightly restricted movement within traffic stream. C >15-25 (Unsignalized); >20-35 (Signalized) Moderate control delay; movement within traffic stream more restricted than at LOS B; formation of queues contributes to lower average travel speeds. D >25-35 (Unsignalized); >35-55 (Signalized) Considerable control delay that may be substantially increased by small increases in flow; average travel speeds continue to decrease. E >35-50 (Unsignalized); >55-80 (Signalized) High control delay; average travel speed no more than 33 percent of free flow speed. F >50 (Unsignalized); >80 (Signalized) Extremely high control delay; extensive queuing and high volumes create exceedingly restricted traffic flow. Traffic models for each scenario were developed using Synchro/SimTraffic, and the delay and queueing were evaluated for each scenario. The scenarios that were analyzed are as follows: • Existing Year (2023) • Future Year (2045) No-Build • Future Year (2045) Build EXISTING YEAR (2023 ) CONDITIONS A capacity analysis was performed for Existing Year (2023) conditions in order to develop baseline operating conditions for the current year. The analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic. The five study intersections were modeled with the existing geometry and intersection control as summarized in Exhibit 2. The traffic volumes are provided in Exhibit 3. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 3. 405 9 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 Table 3 – Existing Year (2023) Intersection Analysis Intersection Vehicle Delay (LOS) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Left* Through Right Overall Left* Through Right Overall W 78th Street & Market Boulevard Signal EB A (9.2) A (9.8) A (3.7) A (8.2) B (11.7) B (15.1) A (4.7) B (14.0) WB A (8.9) A (5.0) A (2.6) B (14.6) A (9.7) A (6.7) NB B (18.1) B (13.6) A (5.9) C (28.8) B (17.3) A (8.5) SB B (13.8) B (14.7) A (3.6) B (14.7) B (19.5) A (7.0) Market Boulevard & Market Sq. North Driveway Side Street Stop EB A (8.7) A (3.4) - (-) C (18.3) C (24.8) A (6.1) - (-) WB A (8.6) A (8.1) C (19.4) C (24.1) A (7.7) NB A (2.9) A (0.6) A (0.2) A (4.9) A (1.9) A (0.3) SB A (3.3) A (0.8) A (0.5) A (4.7) A (1.4) A (0.8) Market Boulevard & Market Street Side Street Stop EB B (10.2) A (3.6) - (-) B (14.4) C (22.5) A (4.7) - (-) WB A (6.8) A (2.9) C (18.3) A (8.1) NB A (3.4) A (1.4) A (1.1) A (6.2) A (2.7) A (1.2) SB A (4.1) A (0.4) A (0.2) A (5.2) A (0.7) A (0.7) W 78th Street & Laredo Boulevard Signal EB A (7.7) A (4.8) A (3.1) A (7.2) A (9.2) A (5.7) A (4.1) A (8.2) WB A (5.2) A (5.0) A (2.0) A (8.2) A (5.8) A (3.5) NB C (24.9) B (15.7) A (6.3) C (25.6) C (34.4) B (13.0) SB C (25.1) B (18.4) A (5.3) C (28.1) C (25.6) A (7.2) Great Plains Boulevard & Market Street Side Street Stop EB A (5.8) A (2.7) - (-) A (8.4) A (3.2) - (-) WB A (6.8) A (3.5) B (10.0) B (12.5) A (4.8) NB A (2.5) A (0.5) A (0.3) A (2.8) A (0.3) A (0.1) SB A (3.5) A (1.3) A (1.1) A (4.2) A (1.1) A (1.1) Note: Overall intersection delay not shown for side street stop controlled intersection as doing so can mask poor side street operations. Based on the Existing Year (2023) capacity analysis, both signalized intersections operate at LOS B or better in the AM and PM peak hour. All movements at unsignalized intersections operate at LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours. The queueing results were reviewed, and the following movements were determined to have an Existing (2023) queues approaching capacity, based on the 95th percentile queueing results: • Westbound left turn at W 78th Street & Market Boulevard (AM and PM Peak Hours) • Southbound left turn at W 78th Street & Laredo Drive (AM and PM Peak Hours) All other 95th percentile queue lengths are anticipated to be maintained within their respective storage bays. The Existing (2023) SimTraffic reports are included in Appendix E. FUTURE YEAR (2045) NO-BUILD CONDITIONS A capacity analysis was performed for Future Year (2045) No-Build conditions in order to develop baseline operating conditions for the opening year. The analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic. The study intersections were modeled with geometric changes proposed as part of the Market Boulevard corridor 406 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 10 study, as shown in Appendix D. The Future Year (2045) No-Build traffic volumes were determined by growing the Existing (2023) traffic volumes by 22 years and adding the site trips from background developments (Exhibits 5 and 6). The traffic volumes are provided in Exhibit 7. Analysis of the Market Boulevard & Market Square North Driveway roundabout was conducted using the roundabout analysis software Rodel rather than SimTraffic, with a confidence interval of 85% applied to be conservative. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 4. Table 4 – Future Year (2045) No -Build Intersection Analysis Intersection Vehicle Delay (LOS) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Left* Through Right Overall Left* Through Right Overall W 78th Street & Market Boulevard Signal EB B (10.1) B (10.7) A (4.3) A (8.9) B (19.3) C (22.1) A (8.8) C (20.3) WB B (10.0) A (6.7) A (2.2) C (21.6) B (15.9) A (2.6) NB B (19.6) B (12.7) A (4.4) D (38.9) B (18.4) A (9.8) SB C (21.6) B (13.5) A (3.4) C (22.6) B (18.5) A (7.1) Market Boulevard & Market Sq. North Driveway Rounda- bout EB A (5.4) A (5.6) B (11.0) A (9.5) WB A (4.8) A (6.9) NB A (6.1) A (9.2) SB A (4.8) A (7.3) Market Boulevard & Market Street Side Street Stop EB A (3.4) - (-) A (6.3) - (-) WB A (3.2) B (11.6) NB A (3.1) A (0.3) A (0.2) A (6.7) A (2.1) A (0.5) SB A (2.8) A (0.3) A (0.2) A (6.6) A (1.0) A (0.6) W 78th Street & Laredo Boulevard Signal EB A (8.4) A (5.3) A (3.6) A (7.8) B (10.1) A (5.8) A (3.6) A (8.9) WB B (10.5) A (6.3) A (2.1) A (9.3) A (7.4) A (2.1) NB C (21.4) B (19.8) A (5.9) C (28.9) C (22.8) B (11.7) SB C (23.6) C (23.0) A (5.7) C (31.6) C (26.9) A (8.6) Great Plains Boulevard & Market Street Side Street Stop EB A (9.2) A (3.3) - (-) B (10.9) A (3.7) - (-) WB A (6.9) A (3.3) B (12.5) B (10.7) A (4.3) NB A (3.0) A (0.2) A (0.2) A (3.1) A (0.3) A (0.1) SB A (3.6) A (1.0) A (1.0) A (5.1) A (1.2) A (1.3) Note: Overall intersection delay not shown for side street stop controlled intersection as doing so can mask poor side street operations. With the addition of background traffic growth, the study area intersections are projected to experience small changes in delay with the majority of movements and approaches projected to operate with similar LOS as compared to existing conditions. All intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better and all individual movements operate at LOS D or better. The queueing results were reviewed, and the following movements were determined to have Future Year (2045) No Build queues approaching capacity, based on the 95th percentile queueing results: • Westbound left turn at W 78th Street & Market Boulevard (AM and PM Peak Hours) • Northbound left turn at W 78th Street & Market Boulevard (PM Peak Hour) 407 11 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 • Southbound left turn at W 78th Street & Laredo Drive (AM and PM Peak Hours) The SimTraffic reports are provided in Appendix E. FUTURE YEAR (2045) B UILD CONDITIONS Future Year (2045) Build conditions were analyzed to determine any traffic impacts from the addition of the site traffic to the study intersections. Future Year (2045) Build turning movement volumes were developed by adding the site trips in Exhibits 10 and 12 to the Future Year (2045) No-Build turning movement volumes in Exhibit 7. The Future Year (2045) Build turning movement volumes are shown in Exhibit 13. Signal timings were optimized at key study area intersections. Analysis was conducted using the same geometry as the Future Year (2045) No Build scenario. The results of the analysis are provided in Table 5. Table 5 – Future Year (2045) Build Intersection Analysis Intersection Vehicle Delay (LOS) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Left* Through Right Overall Left* Through Right Overall W 78th Street & Market Boulevard Signal EB A (9.2) B (11.3) A (4.7) A (9.5) C (20.0) C (25.3) B (10.1) C (21.6) WB B (11.2) A (6.2) A (2.2) C (25.7) B (15.7) A (3.1) NB C (21.0) B (15.5) A (5.7) D (39.8) C (20.5) B (10.9) SB C (21.0) B (16.2) A (4.3) C (23.4) B (18.0) A (9.0) Market Boulevard & Market Sq. North Driveway Rounda- bout EB A (5.0) A (6.0) A (7.7) B (10.6) WB A (5.0) A (7.3) NB A (5.7) B (12.7) SB A (6.6) B (10.1) Market Boulevard & Market Street Side Street Stop EB A (4.8) - (-) A (6.8) - (-) WB A (3.4) C (16.8) NB A (3.5) A (0.4) A (0.2) A (7.1) A (3.0) A (0.9) SB A (3.5) A (0.9) A (0.8) A (6.4) A (1.0) A (0.9) W 78th Street & Laredo Boulevard Signal EB B (10.0) A (8.1) A (5.4) B (10.0) B (12.7) B (10.0) A (7.2) B (11.1) WB A (9.1) A (8.2) A (2.7) B (14.2) A (9.1) A (2.4) NB C (21.3) C (25.7) B (10.0) C (25.8) C (27.7) B (15.0) SB C (23.9) C (26.3) A (6.0) C (25.8) C (21.1) A (8.2) Great Plains Boulevard & Market Street Side Street Stop EB A (8.4) A (3.5) - (-) B (13.8) A (4.1) - (-) WB A (7.5) A (3.5) B (12.1) B (10.8) A (4.8) NB A (2.4) A (0.2) A (0.2) A (3.4) A (0.3) A (0.2) SB A (3.8) A (1.2) A (1.0) A (5.4) A (1.6) A (1.5) Note: Overall intersection delay not shown for side street stop controlled intersection as doing so can mask poor side street operations. With the addition of site-generated traffic, the study area intersections are projected to experience very little change in delay with the majority of movements and approaches projected to operate at the same LOS as compared to Future Year (2045) No-Build Conditions. All intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS C 408 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 12 or better and all individual movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours. The queueing results were reviewed, and the following movements were determined to have Future Year (2045) Build scenario queues approaching capacity, based on the 95th percentile queueing results: • Westbound left turn at W 78th Street & Market Boulevard (AM and PM Peak Hours) • Northbound left turn at W 78th Street & Market Boulevard (PM Peak Hour) • Southbound left turn at W 78th Street & Laredo Drive (AM and PM Peak Hours) • Eastbound left turn at W 78th Street & Laredo Drive (PM Peak Hour) No mitigations are needed to the roadway network in order to accommodate the site generated traffic. Results of the analysis are included in Appendix E. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Roers Companies is proposing a mid-rise multifamily housing development for the southeast quadrant of the W 78th Street & Market Boulevard intersection. The site would be redeveloped from a hotel into 310 residential units and 15,000 square feet of restaurant and retail space. The site is currently occupied by a hotel and strip retail space. The site is anticipated to generate 3,015 daily trips including 259 AM peak hour trips (105 entering and 154 exiting) and 257 PM peak hour trips (157 entering and 100 exiting). This trip generation estimate should be considered extremely conservative because it was assumed all retail/restaurant space was occupied by a highly trip intensive land use (high turnover sit-down restaurant). It is likely that some portion of this retail restaurant space will be occupied by less trip intensive uses. The trip generation estimate was also not offset by trips from existing site uses. The site will utilize two access points (both existing), a primary access at 78th Street & Laredo Drive, and a secondary access to Market Street through connected parking lots. A capacity analysis was performed for Existing Year (2023), Future Year (2045) No-Build, and Future Year (2045) Build conditions. In all scenarios, the determined that study intersections and movements adjacent to the proposed project are anticipated to operate at acceptable levels of service in the AM and PM peak hours. The proposed development is anticipated to have a minimal impact on the operations of the roadway network. The proposed development is not anticipated to cause queueing issues in the Future Year (2045) Build scenario. APPENDIX A. Exhibits B. Turning Movement Counts C. Proposed Development Site Plans D. Market Boulevard Corridor Plans E. SimTraffic and Rodel Analysis Results 409 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 A. Exhibits 410 NOT TO SCALE W 78th St W 78th St Chan View 5 EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT SITE LOCATION AND STUDY AREA LEGEND Study Intersection Proposed Development Location West Residential Building East Residential Building 411 NOT TO SCALE W 78th St W 78th St Chan View 5 EXHIBIT 2 EXISTING GEOMETRY AND INTERSECTION CONTROL LEGEND Existing Study Intersection Existing Signal Control Existing Stop Control 412 NOT TO SCALE W 78th St W 78th St Chan View 5 LEGEND Study Intersection AM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X) EXHIBIT 3 EXISTING (2023) TRAFFIC VOLUMES 413 NOT TO SCALE W 78th St W 78th St Chan View 5 EXHIBIT 4 TRIP DISTRIBUTION - BACKGROUND TRIPS LEGEND Study Intersection IN% [OUT%] Trip DistributionXX [X X] 414 NOT TO SCALE W 78th St W 78th St Chan View 5 LEGEND Study Intersection AM (PM) Peak Hour TripsXX (X X) EXHIBIT 5 MARKET STREET BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT TRIPS 415 NOT TO SCALE W 78th St W 78th St Chan View 5 LEGEND Study Intersection AM (PM) Peak Hour TripsXX (X X) EXHIBIT 6 CITY HALL BACKGROUND TRIPS ADDED416 NOT TO SCALE W 78th St W 78th St Chan View 5 LEGEND Study Intersection AM (PM) Peak Hour VolumesXX (X X) EXHIBIT 7 FUTURE YEAR (2045) NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 417 NOT TO SCALE W 78th St W 78th St Chan View 5 EXHIBIT 8 FUTURE YEAR (2045) GEOMETRY AND INTERSECTION CONTROL LEGEND Study Intersection Future Signal Control Future Stop Control Future Roundabout 418 NOT TO SCALE W 78th St W 78th St Chan View 5 LEGEND Study Intersection IN% [OUT%] Site Traffic Distribution West Residential Building X X [X X] EXHIBIT 9 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRIP DISTRIBUTION - WEST BUILDING419 NOT TO SCALE W 78th St W 78th St Chan View 5 LEGEND Study Intersection AM (PM) Peak Hour Site Traffic West Residential Building X X (X X) EXHIBIT 10 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE TRIPS - WEST BUILDING 420 NOT TO SCALE W 78th St W 78th St Chan View 5 EXHIBIT 11 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRIP DISTRIBUTION - EAST BUILDING LEGEND Study Intersection IN% [OUT%] Site Traffic Distribution East Residential Building X X [X X] 421 NOT TO SCALE W 78th St W 78th St Chan View 5 LEGEND Study Intersection AM (PM) Peak Hour Site Traffic East Residential Building X X (X X) EXHIBIT 12 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE TRIPS - EAST BUILDING 422 NOT TO SCALE W 78th St W 78th St Chan View 5 LEGEND Study Intersection AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes Development Location X X (X X) EXHIBIT 13 FUTURE YEAR (2045) BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 423 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 B.Turning Movement Counts 14 424 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market Blvd & Market SquareNorth DrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeMarket Square North DrivewayMarket Square North DrivewayMarket BlvdMarket BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total12:00 AM0030031000011400050200021112:15 AM000000000000030003020002512:30 AM100001000000000000010001212:45 AM0000000000000200020000002Hourly Total1030041000011900010050005201:00 AM00000000000001000100000011:15 AM00100100000004000400100161:30 AM10000110000101000100000031:45 AM0000000000000000000000000Hourly Total101002100001060006001001102:00 AM10000100000001000100000022:15 AM00000000000002000200000022:30 AM10000100000000000000000012:45 AM0010010000000200020100014Hourly Total20100300000005000501000193:00 AM10000100000003000300000043:15 AM00100100000000000003000343:30 AM00000010000102000204000473:45 AM1000010010010310040100017Hourly Total201003101002081009080008224:00 AM00001000000000001003000334:15 AM00000010000100000001000124:30 AM00000000001001000105000564:45 AM0000002000020200020400048Hourly Total00001030001303001301300013195:00 AM000000300003220004090009165:15 AM002002000000150006070007155:30 AM00000010000112100401010011165:45 AM00000010000119000100121001324Hourly Total0020025000055181002403820040716:00 AM20000200000015000601900019276:15 AM0010011000012120001401800018346:30 AM4020161000014110001503020032546:45 AM201013010001529200360254002969Hourly Total804021221000312572007109260098184425 7:00 AM40300711000224010043241600491017:15 AM40202620000244100045138900481017:30 AM801009100001155300592721100851547:45 AM60301920000266030069267160085165Hourly Total2209033161000713196700216721842002675218:00 AM50400912000344810053136900461118:15 AM9050114200002660300692571400731588:30 AM417011212101475120060354801651418:45 AM9050114001001146240080453170074169Hourly Total27121034944201103122110002621020048012585799:00 AM140800220000001358100722481400641589:15 AM90110020012003855100640572000771649:30 AM120800201020031759500814501100651699:45 AM5121002710000112627008126260070179Hourly Total4014800892140075023414002988217510027667010:00 AM511400201010021077000872605006717610:15 AM1207001900300318553007624413005915710:30 AM7020002710100210694008325512006918110:45 AM181130032103004185570080763160086202Hourly Total422540098308001156256140032613222460028171611:00 AM191180038513009118940010435620007923011:15 AM15017003232700122178700106381210010525511:30 AM1402401385160012317580011427315009025411:45 AM140190033702029268818001329851200106280Hourly Total6217801141204180242893303700456172956800380101912:00 PM1633210521026001826871700130487190011031012:15 PM20032005292700182287600115988110010829312:30 PM90300039314008276440095386190010825012:45 PM260220148100110021308911001306782600110309Hourly Total71311611191325280065105327380047022339750043611621:00 PM2313700614280014209150011667321001002911:15 PM161250042313027984400973771700972431:30 PM9128003851401101373200885711801942301:45 PM18114003333302913911100115455140073230Hourly Total664104001741571805405533922004161827670013649942:00 PM230210044628001617977001214661700872682:15 PM1602001369030012138230098510316001242702:30 PM200260046501006228080011018415001002622:45 PM1902300421040051898800124764150086257Hourly Total780900116821216003970357260045317317630039710573:00 PM161200037612009138730010358615001062553:15 PM1603103476020082497200123610213001212993:30 PM1302701403110051311390013539720001203003:45 PM191300050251310212010311001344921600112317Hourly Total6421080417417718104370400250049518377640045911714:00 PM2323301586070013229630112129218001123044:15 PM191270047619001623114400141109113001143184:30 PM2212000435050010189780012329925001263024:45 PM160270143527001426838001177892100117291Hourly Total8041070219122328005389390230150221371770046912155:00 PM242330059315009201095001344771800993015:15 PM122460060816001529121500155384120099329426 5:30 PM13137015190600152210050012758613001042975:45 PM122200034632001121995001254902100115285Hourly Total6171360120426519005092429200054116337640041712126:00 PM2102201433270012208560011128916001072736:15 PM19125004522410915809001042651500822406:30 PM2232601514040081186500102078800862476:45 PM130250038200002117060087177120090217Hourly Total7549802177114151031573212600404530951003659777:00 PM1412110373050081968400911711600882247:15 PM9114002421200585860072065600711727:30 PM90160025123006115030064452900651607:45 PM4017002131100585420064365100078168Hourly Total362681010794110024462301500291825341003027248:00 PM4012001611000264920057150300541298:15 PM11119003151100784620056142400471418:30 PM0070073010047320003903240036868:45 PM5090014003003743200520271002897Hourly Total201470068925001628170600204215112001654539:00 PM411300180010014330003713060037939:15 PM201100130000005281003401820020679:30 PM4050091020032190002111810020539:45 PM107008000000310000130103101435Hourly Total111360048103004149010010527612109124810:00 PM2030050000001810010012300153010:15 PM3020050010010800080340072110:30 PM0000001000111700080600061510:45 PM00000000000024200805200715Hourly Total505001010101242730034026900358111:00 PM201003000000050005011100122011:15 PM10300400000039000120400042011:30 PM2000020000000300030230051011:45 PM0000100000000600060300039Hourly Total504019000000323000260204002459Grand Total7793311412221955212501952104598904446291025627184416180612515213193Approach %39.81.758.40.1--46.210.942.50.4--15.879.05.20.0--3.680.815.60.0---Total %5.90.38.60.0-14.81.60.41.50.0-3.56.733.72.20.0-42.71.431.56.10.0-39.1-Lights7723011352-1939211471932-45388143612870-552918440758021-506212983% Lights99.190.999.5100.0-99.299.594.099.0100.0-98.799.098.198.6--98.3100.097.999.5100.0-98.398.4Buses0000-00000-011810-2002600-2646% Buses0.00.00.00.0-0.00.00.00.00.0-0.00.10.40.3--0.40.00.60.00.0-0.50.3Trucks7060-131120-486520-7505840-62154% Trucks0.90.00.50.0-0.70.52.01.00.0-0.90.91.50.7--1.30.01.40.50.0-1.21.2Bicycles on Road0300-30200-20210-30200-210% Bicycles onRoad0.09.10.00.0-0.20.04.00.00.0-0.40.00.00.3--0.10.00.00.00.0-0.00.1Bicycles onCrosswalk----10-----3-----1-----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk----45.5-----30.0-----50.0-----0.0--Pedestrians----12-----7-----1-----2--% Pedestrians----54.5-----70.0-----50.0-----100.0--427 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market Blvd & Market SquareNorth DrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 405/24/2023 12:00 AMEnding At05/25/2023 12:00 AMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherMarket Blvd [SB]OutInTotal5327506210389182644746213622400054215152105738024075184100260004580000200000002806416118412RTLUP510 0 4 2 1 503 Out 459 0 2 4 0 453 In 969 0 6 6 1 956 Total Market Square North Drive R 195 0 0 2 0 193 T 50 0 2 1 0 47 L 212 0 0 1 0 211 U 2 0 0 0 0 2 P 10 10 0 0 0 0 542155291095026204665751402350005514562711141OutInTotalMarket Blvd [NB]ULTRP0881436128700118100865200021000002089044462912Market Square North DriveTotal3671126503703In1939013301955Out1732113201748200002U7720700779L30003033T113506001141R00002222PTurning Movement Data Plot428 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market Blvd & Market SquareNorth DrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM)Start TimeMarket Square North DrivewayMarket Square North DrivewayMarket BlvdMarket BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total11:00 AM191180038513009118940010435620007923011:15 AM15017003232700122178700106381210010525511:30 AM1402401385160012317580011427315009025411:45 AM140190033702029268818001329851200106280Total62178011412041802428933037004561729568003801019Approach %44.00.755.30.0--47.69.542.90.0--19.572.48.10.0--4.577.617.90.0---Total %6.10.17.70.0-13.82.00.41.80.0-4.18.732.43.60.0-44.71.728.96.70.0-37.3-PHF0.8160.2500.8130.000-0.9280.7140.5000.6430.000-0.8750.7180.9270.5140.000-0.8640.4720.8680.8100.000-0.8960.910Lights621780-141203180-4189323370-44917293680-3781009% Lights100.0100.0100.0--100.0100.075.0100.0--97.6100.097.9100.0--98.5100.099.3100.0--99.599.0Buses0000-00000-00000-00000-00% Buses0.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.0Trucks0000-00100-10700-70200-210% Trucks0.00.00.0--0.00.025.00.0--2.40.02.10.0--1.50.00.70.0--0.51.0Bicycles on Road0000-00000-00000-00000-00% Bicycles onRoad0.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.0Bicycles onCrosswalk----0-----2-----0-----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk----0.0-----100.0--------------Pedestrians----1-----0-----0-----0--% Pedestrians----100.0-----0.0--------------429 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market Blvd & Market SquareNorth DrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 6Peak Hour Data05/24/2023 11:00 AMEnding At05/24/2023 12:00 PMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherMarket Blvd [SB]OutInTotal40337878100072900000041038079068293170000000020000000000000682951700RTLUP55 0 0 0 0 55 Out 42 0 0 1 0 41 In 97 0 0 1 0 96 Total Market Square North Drive R 18 0 0 0 0 18 T 4 0 0 1 0 3 L 20 0 0 0 0 20 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 2 2 0 0 0 0 391449840000279000000393456849OutInTotalMarket Blvd [NB]ULTRP08932337000000007000000000000089330370Market Square North DriveTotal3010100302In1410000141Out1600100161000000U62000062L100001T78000078R000011PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM)430 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market Blvd & Market SquareNorth DrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 7Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (3:45 PM)Start TimeMarket Square North DrivewayMarket Square North DrivewayMarket BlvdMarket BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total3:45 PM1913000502513102120103110013449216001123174:00 PM2323301586070013229630112129218001123044:15 PM191270047619001623114400141109113001143184:30 PM221200043505001018978001232992500126302Total835110011981963410608341026015191837472004641241Approach %41.92.555.60.0--31.710.056.71.7--16.079.05.00.0--3.980.615.50.0---Total %6.70.48.90.0-16.01.50.52.70.1-4.86.733.02.10.0-41.81.530.15.80.0-37.4-PHF0.9020.6250.8330.000-0.8530.7920.3000.6540.250-0.7140.9020.8990.5910.000-0.9200.4500.9440.7200.000-0.9210.976Lights8351100-198196341-6083406260-51518370720-4601233% Lights100.0100.0100.0--100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0-100.0100.099.0100.0--99.2100.098.9100.0--99.199.4Buses0000-00000-00100-10200-23% Buses0.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.00.0-0.00.00.20.0--0.20.00.50.0--0.40.2Trucks0000-00000-00300-30200-25% Trucks0.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.00.0-0.00.00.70.0--0.60.00.50.0--0.40.4Bicycles on Road0000-00000-00000-00000-00% Bicycles onRoad0.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.00.0-0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.0Bicycles onCrosswalk----1-----0-----1-----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk----100.0-----------100.0--------Pedestrians----0-----0-----0-----0--% Pedestrians----0.0-----------0.0--------431 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market Blvd & Market SquareNorth DrivewaySite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 8Peak Hour Data05/24/2023 3:45 PMEnding At05/24/2023 4:45 PMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherMarket Blvd [SB]OutInTotal52346098312332500000052746499172370180002000020000000000000723741800RTLUP50 0 0 0 0 50 Out 60 0 0 0 0 60 In 110 0 0 0 0 110 Total Market Square North Drive R 34 0 0 0 0 34 T 6 0 0 0 0 6 L 19 0 0 0 0 19 U 1 0 0 0 0 1 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 49951510142132350000005035191022OutInTotalMarket Blvd [NB]ULTRP08340626000100003000000000001083410261Market Square North DriveTotal3590000359In1980000198Out1610000161000000U83000083L500005T1100000110R000011PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (3:45 PM)432 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market St & Great Plains BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/22/2023Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeMarket StPrivate DrivewayGreat Plains BlvdGreat Plains BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total3:30 PM10600720000266521074150300541373:45 PM3020053010045761008216010062153Hourly Total40800125010061114131015621104001162904:00 PM202004601007128131097255100581664:15 PM20800104060010897800113451300581914:30 PM0090096060012128131097451210581764:45 PM404008805001399750011176210070202Hourly Total80230031240180042413561920418172197102447355:00 PM301400176130010686900101352100561845:15 PM106007601100177106700120447010521965:30 PM20902112020047103200112251300561835:45 PM1050062170110205740081353100066163Hourly Total703402411622301414035222004141220314102307266:00 PM21400730200596300072047500521366:15 PM10700801000114520206815090060137*** BREAK ***-------------------------Hourly Total311100153120062311502014019714001122736:30 AM0020020020021151001741510020416:45 AM104025301004217200211220002353Hourly Total1060273030063323003853710043947:00 AM2030053010040204002401800018517:15 AM33400101040051327004032100024797:30 AM302005903001243870049536100421087:45 AM7080015805001346912008563800044157Hourly Total15317003521013003491593000198141131001283958:00 AM404008705001222960037538000431008:15 AM3050081040053246003322710030768:30 AM0030033030066193002823730042798:45 AM1040053030068487106402320025100Hourly Total8016002414015002919120221016291256001403559:00 AM10902103000038224203624311047969:15 AM301004101002930100400291003076Grand Total504125061799037601169163132710480160262976493010903040Approach %27.92.269.80.0--53.31.845.00.0--10.282.86.50.5--5.789.54.50.3---Total %1.60.14.10.0-5.93.00.12.50.0-5.65.443.73.40.3-52.72.032.11.60.1-35.9-433 Lights4841220-174901750-16615913181038-158862961493-10753003% Lights96.0100.097.6--97.2100.033.398.7--98.297.599.399.0100.0-99.1100.098.5100.0100.0-98.698.8Buses1000-10000-00600-60800-815% Buses2.00.00.0--0.60.00.00.0--0.00.00.50.00.0-0.40.00.80.00.0-0.70.5Trucks1020-30010-11110-30600-613% Trucks2.00.01.6--1.70.00.01.3--0.60.60.11.00.0-0.20.00.60.00.0-0.60.4Bicycles on Road0010-10200-23200-50100-19% Bicycles onRoad0.00.00.8--0.60.066.70.0--1.21.80.20.00.0-0.30.00.10.00.0-0.10.3Bicycles onCrosswalk----2-----0-----0-----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk----33.3-----0.0--------------Pedestrians----4-----1-----0-----0--% Pedestrians----66.7-----100.0--------------434 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market St & Great Plains BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/22/2023Page No: 305/22/2023 3:30 PMEnding At05/23/2023 9:30 AMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGreat Plains Blvd [SB]OutInTotal144410752519781536921300014561090254649961623008000060000100000000499766230RTLUP170 0 0 1 0 169 Out 169 0 2 1 0 166 In 339 0 2 2 0 335 Total Private Driveway [WB] R 76 0 0 1 0 75 T 3 0 2 0 0 1 L 90 0 0 0 0 90 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 1 1 0 0 0 0 11811588276986148311257000119916022801OutInTotalGreat Plains Blvd [NB]ULTRP81591318103000600011100320000000816313271040Market St [EB]Total3831460394In1741310179Out2090150215000000U48110050L400004T1220210125R000066PTurning Movement Data Plot435 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market St & Great Plains BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/22/2023Page No: 4Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:45 PM)Start TimeMarket StPrivate DrivewayGreat Plains BlvdGreat Plains BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total4:45 PM4040088050013997500111762100702025:00 PM301400176130010686900101352100561845:15 PM106007601100177106700120447010521965:30 PM2090211202004710320011225130056183Total10033024322121004429392230044416212510234765Approach %23.30.076.70.0--50.02.347.70.0--6.588.35.20.0--6.890.62.10.4---Total %1.30.04.30.0-5.62.90.12.70.0-5.83.851.23.00.0-58.02.127.70.70.1-30.6-PHF0.6250.0000.5890.000-0.6320.6880.2500.4770.000-0.6470.8060.9250.6390.000-0.9250.5710.8550.4170.250-0.8360.947Lights100330-43220210-4329392230-4441621151-233763% Lights100.0-100.0--100.0100.00.0100.0--97.7100.0100.0100.0--100.0100.099.5100.0100.0-99.699.7Buses0000-00000-00000-00000-00% Buses0.0-0.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.00.0-0.00.0Trucks0000-00000-00000-00000-00% Trucks0.0-0.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.00.0-0.00.0Bicycles on Road0000-00100-10000-00100-12% Bicycles onRoad0.0-0.0--0.00.0100.00.0--2.30.00.00.0--0.00.00.50.00.0-0.40.3Bicycles onCrosswalk----2-----0-----0-----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk----100.0--------------------Pedestrians----0-----0-----0-----0--% Pedestrians----0.0--------------------436 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market St & Great Plains BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/22/2023Page No: 5Peak Hour Data05/22/2023 4:45 PMEnding At05/22/2023 5:45 PMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGreat Plains Blvd [SB]OutInTotal424233657000000011000424234658521116100000000000010000000052121610RTLUP39 0 0 0 0 39 Out 44 0 1 0 0 43 In 83 0 1 0 0 82 Total Private Driveway [WB] R 21 0 0 0 0 21 T 1 0 1 0 0 0 L 22 0 0 0 0 22 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 266444710000000101000267444711OutInTotalGreat Plains Blvd [NB]ULTRP02939223000000000000000000000029392230Market St [EB]Total77001078In43000043Out34001035000000U10000010L000000T33000033R000022PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:45 PM)437 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market St & Great Plains BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/22/2023Page No: 6Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:15 AM)Start TimeMarket StPrivate DrivewayGreat Plains BlvdGreat Plains BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total7:15 AM33400101040051327004032100024797:30 AM302005903001243870049536100421087:45 AM70800158050013469120085638000441578:00 AM40400870500122296003753800043100Total17318003825017004211168320021119133100153444Approach %44.77.947.40.0--59.50.040.50.0--5.279.615.20.0--12.486.90.70.0---Total %3.80.74.10.0-8.65.60.03.80.0-9.52.537.87.20.0-47.54.330.00.20.0-34.5-PHF0.6070.2500.5630.000-0.6330.6940.0000.8500.000-0.8080.6880.6090.6670.000-0.6210.7920.8750.2500.000-0.8690.707Lights163160-35250170-4210166320-2081912910-149434% Lights94.1100.088.9--92.1100.0-100.0--100.090.998.8100.0--98.6100.097.0100.0--97.497.7Buses1000-10000-00200-20300-36% Buses5.90.00.0--2.60.0-0.0--0.00.01.20.0--0.90.02.30.0--2.01.4Trucks0010-10000-00000-00100-12% Trucks0.00.05.6--2.60.0-0.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.80.0--0.70.5Bicycles on Road0010-10000-01000-10000-02% Bicycles onRoad0.00.05.6--2.60.0-0.0--0.09.10.00.0--0.50.00.00.0--0.00.5Bicycles onCrosswalk----0-----0-----0-----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk-------------------------Pedestrians----0-----0-----0-----0--% Pedestrians-------------------------438 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market St & Great Plains BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/22/2023Page No: 7Peak Hour Data05/23/2023 7:15 AMEnding At05/23/2023 8:15 AMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherGreat Plains Blvd [SB]OutInTotal199149348336011000000202153355112919000300001000000000000011331900RTLUP54 0 0 0 0 54 Out 42 0 0 0 0 42 In 96 0 0 0 0 96 Total Private Driveway [WB] R 17 0 0 0 0 17 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 25 0 0 0 0 25 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 170208378325202112000176211387OutInTotalGreat Plains Blvd [NB]ULTRP01016632000200000000100000000011168320Market St [EB]Total46112050In35111038Out11001012000000U16100017L300003T16011018R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:15 AM)439 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market St & Market BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/22/2023Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimePrivate DriveMarket StMarket BlvdMarket BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total3:30 PM002800281422001834132700173387010913103:45 PM21220025304007241229001553105100109296Hourly Total215000531726002558254160032861921102006064:00 PM0021002170300103115370119111141001163384:15 PM00290029429001533139110018331120001153424:30 PM011200132040061810350012621360001382834:45 PM022600288060114371232001622114100117321Hourly Total038800912122201451195182501662847620048612845:00 PM4021002570301102411570014611061001082895:15 PM102100224040082812470015931071001113005:30 PM002000201115031726114700147290110942785:45 PM021700190010412411351014329500097260Hourly Total527900862211308361024662610595839831041011276:00 PM2122002541202715105130013311031001052706:15 PM101800194130081410690012917300074230*** BREAK ***-------------------------Hourly Total31400044825021529211220026221761001795006:30 AM1050061100026180002401920021536:45 AM005005300003540100461410004296Hourly Total10100011410005115810070160200631497:00 AM1020030000004425005113900040947:15 AM00500540100576280077244200481357:30 AM10100200300366070073179200821607:45 AM10100210100286611008527570084173Hourly Total30900125050010252303100286623711002545628:00 AM10000130200595570071069000691468:15 AM000000201003126580085361100651538:30 AM308001110000185130062141100431178:45 AM009009701018126713009206120063172Hourly Total401700211304011741238310031042324002405889:00 AM00100010201023137450092050100511569:15 AM111100135020079567007254320050142Grand Total19831400341978580141634072105164112677401864272019335114Approach %5.62.392.10.0--59.54.935.60.0--15.278.66.10.0--2.196.41.40.1---Total %0.40.26.10.0-6.71.90.21.10.0-3.28.041.23.20.0-52.30.836.40.50.0-37.8-440 Lights1883120-338947570-15839520631591-2618391825252-18915005% Lights94.7100.099.4--99.196.987.598.3--96.997.198.097.0100.0-97.897.597.992.6100.0-97.897.9Buses0000-00000-011300-1401500-1529% Buses0.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.20.60.00.0-0.50.00.80.00.0-0.80.6Trucks1010-23110-5112740-4212420-2776% Trucks5.30.00.3--0.63.112.51.7--3.12.71.32.40.0-1.62.51.37.40.0-1.41.5Bicycles on Road0010-10000-00210-30000-04% Bicycles onRoad0.00.00.3--0.30.00.00.0--0.00.00.10.60.0-0.10.00.00.00.0-0.00.1Bicycles onCrosswalk----0-----2-----1-----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk----------14.3-----100.0--------Pedestrians----0-----12-----0-----0--% Pedestrians----------85.7-----0.0--------441 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market St & Market BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/22/2023Page No: 305/22/2023 3:30 PMEnding At05/23/2023 9:30 AMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherMarket Blvd [SB]OutInTotal214018914031131528292756202000218419334117251825392001500022410000000000002718644020RTLUP212 0 1 5 0 206 Out 163 0 0 5 0 158 In 375 0 1 10 0 364 Total Market St [WB] R 58 0 0 1 0 57 T 8 0 0 1 0 7 L 97 0 0 3 0 94 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 14 14 0 0 0 0 223226184850151429284270134000227626774953OutInTotalMarket Blvd [NB]ULTRP13952063159001130001127400021000001140721051641Private Drive [EB]Total76511610783In3380210341Out42711400442000000U18010019L800008T3120110314R000000PTurning Movement Data Plot442 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market St & Market BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/22/2023Page No: 4Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (3:30 PM)Start TimePrivate DriveMarket StMarket BlvdMarket BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total3:30 PM002800281422001834132700173387010913103:45 PM212200253040072412290015531051001092964:00 PM0021002170300103115370119111141001163384:15 PM0029002942900153313911001833112000115342Total21100001032841800501225463401702104182104311286Approach %1.91.097.10.0--56.08.036.00.0--17.477.84.80.0--2.397.00.50.2---Total %0.20.17.80.0-8.02.20.31.40.0-3.99.542.52.60.0-54.60.832.50.20.1-33.5-PHF0.2500.2500.8620.000-0.8880.5000.5000.5000.000-0.6940.8970.8920.7730.000-0.9190.8330.9170.5000.250-0.9290.940Lights21980-101284180-50120541330-6941041311-4251270% Lights100.0100.098.0--98.1100.0100.0100.0--100.098.499.197.1--98.9100.098.850.0100.0-98.698.8Buses0000-00000-00300-30100-14% Buses0.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.50.0--0.40.00.20.00.0-0.20.3Trucks0010-10000-02200-40410-510% Trucks0.00.01.0--1.00.00.00.0--0.01.60.40.0--0.60.01.050.00.0-1.20.8Bicycles on Road0010-10000-00010-10000-02% Bicycles onRoad0.00.01.0--1.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.02.9--0.10.00.00.00.0-0.00.2Bicycles onCrosswalk----0-----0-----1-----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk----------------100.0--------Pedestrians----0-----0-----0-----0--% Pedestrians----------------0.0--------443 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market St & Market BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/22/2023Page No: 5Peak Hour Data05/22/2023 3:30 PMEnding At05/22/2023 4:30 PMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherMarket Blvd [SB]OutInTotal562425987314257000000567431998141310100100014000000000000024181010RTLUP45 0 1 0 0 44 Out 50 0 0 0 0 50 In 95 0 1 0 0 94 Total Market St [WB] R 18 0 0 0 0 18 T 4 0 0 0 0 4 L 28 0 0 0 0 28 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 53969412331345491120005467021248OutInTotalMarket Blvd [NB]ULTRP0120541330003000220000010000010122546341Private Drive [EB]Total2260410231In1010110103Out1250300128000000U200002L100001T980110100R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (3:30 PM)444 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market St & Market BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/22/2023Page No: 6Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (7:30 AM)Start TimePrivate DriveMarket StMarket BlvdMarket BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total7:30 AM10100200300366070073179200821607:45 AM101002101002866110085275700841738:00 AM10000130200595570071069000691468:15 AM00000020100312658008536110065153Total302005607001335246330031462841000300632Approach %60.00.040.00.0--46.20.053.80.0--11.178.310.50.0--2.094.73.30.0---Total %0.50.00.30.0-0.80.90.01.10.0-2.15.538.95.20.0-49.70.944.91.60.0-47.5-PHF0.7500.0000.5000.000-0.6250.5000.0000.5830.000-0.6500.7290.9320.7500.000-0.9240.5000.8990.3570.000-0.8930.913Lights3020-56060-1233231320-2965271100-286599% Lights100.0-100.0--100.0100.0-85.7--92.394.393.997.0--94.383.395.4100.0--95.394.8Buses0000-00000-01500-601100-1117% Buses0.0-0.0--0.00.0-0.0--0.02.92.00.0--1.90.03.90.0--3.72.7Trucks0000-00010-11910-111200-315% Trucks0.0-0.0--0.00.0-14.3--7.72.93.73.0--3.516.70.70.0--1.02.4Bicycles on Road0000-00000-00100-10000-01% Bicycles onRoad0.0-0.0--0.00.0-0.0--0.00.00.40.0--0.30.00.00.0--0.00.2Bicycles onCrosswalk----0-----0-----0-----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk-------------------------Pedestrians----0-----0-----0-----0--% Pedestrians-------------------------445 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: Market St & Market BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/22/2023Page No: 7Peak Hour Data05/23/2023 7:30 AMEnding At05/23/2023 8:30 AMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherMarket Blvd [SB]OutInTotal24028652651116103131010002563005561027150001100002100000000000010284600RTLUP39 0 0 2 0 37 Out 13 0 0 1 0 12 In 52 0 0 3 0 49 Total Market St [WB] R 7 0 0 1 0 6 T 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 6 0 0 0 0 6 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 2792965751161721113011000292314606OutInTotalMarket Blvd [NB]ULTRP03323132001500019100010000000035246330Private Drive [EB]Total48110050In500005Out43110045000000U300003L000000T200002R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:30 AM)446 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: W 78th St & Laredo BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeW 78th StW 78th StPrivate DrivewayLaredo BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total12:00 AM4300070000000000001020031012:15 AM020002040004000000100001712:30 AM120003110002000000000000512:45 AM2200040100010000002000027Hourly Total7900016160007000000402006291:00 AM00000000000000000000000001:15 AM10000102000200000000000031:30 AM00000001000100000000100121:45 AM0010010000000000100000001Hourly Total10100203000300001000100162:00 AM00000000000000000000000002:15 AM11000200100100000000000032:30 AM01000100000000000000000012:45 AM0100010000000000000000001Hourly Total13000400100100000000000053:00 AM01000102000200000000000033:15 AM00000000100100000000100123:30 AM01000100000000000000101123:45 AM1200030100010000000000004Hourly Total140005031004000000002012114:00 AM00000000000000000000000004:15 AM01000100000000000000000014:30 AM02001205001500001000000074:45 AM0410050100011000011010029Hourly Total071018060016100011101002175:00 AM04000403000300000000200295:15 AM341008021003000000502007185:30 AM041005031004000000202014135:45 AM280001005000510000100402420Hourly Total520200270132001510000170100317606:00 AM090029050005100011403017226:15 AM7900016051006100001402006296:30 AM5210002609200111010024060110496:45 AM4270003101830021202004307011066Hourly Total16660028203760043503018150180333166447 7:00 AM173200049021800295000057090116997:15 AM35420007713411004621100440600101377:30 AM54551001101352001564100152305201752467:45 AM35610160147700558020010121250138163Hourly Total109185201296313746011861923012446192031396458:00 AM1264100771278003650000580903171358:15 AM97100080153400581030141613803551978:30 AM96420075143910543100041914301631968:45 AM147150190056110067100021110140225183Hourly Total442708013223179321021510130314542104091607119:00 AM123730152145500513110251111701291379:15 AM14599008204970056412037601902251709:30 AM154760068149600568130012601700231599:45 AM1258701770467005330100470180325159Hourly Total5320125022792189250021618370528301710610262510:00 AM1958510830479005660000615011012617110:15 AM1550601710497005642003612220003416710:30 AM19586008306110017161000715114023019110:45 AM20652008716870076700007201210142212Hourly Total7323119113241225330125923300326624660413274111:00 AM18579008415712007040000414021003519311:15 AM185611008506118007921200515020003520411:30 AM21697009707311008460000614022023622311:45 AM1310150011917618009510130014112240137265Hourly Total7028332003852267590032822250029542870314388512:00 PM2069800972821600100931001313027054025012:15 PM297214111161711200841121001415031034626012:30 PM1389300105170110082821011111229014224012:45 PM20889101182771300928220012221260149271Hourly Total823183421436630052003583695015061311301017710211:00 PM1971800980831300966100171002500352361:15 PM1875420991689007890200111502000352231:30 PM2069700961669007682002101521703342161:45 PM33727001120581600748110110143241142238Hourly Total902872620405227547003243143043854586141469132:00 PM41636101111712000924210071143900542642:15 PM2087400111071130084155200222326202873042:30 PM168111001080757008282001101523200492492:45 PM2287800117370130086305008251390065276Hourly Total99318291044742875300344309801477491720225510933:00 PM16961000122179120092116000172515001763073:15 PM28785011111911400106511007924103522763:30 PM276613031062881300103131000141814102602833:45 PM20821010113110722001309210012142220138293Hourly Total913223814452536561004313810200506661540722611594:00 PM31861312131199150011562602141823301533134:15 PM29112210016231002300126103001131703500523534:30 PM249515001342911710111112200151423300493094:45 PM1685800109288250011518120021132360151296Hourly Total1003785712536837880104674581003636261370220512715:00 PM2387110012121021400118142000161213301463015:15 PM2184110011621042200128702019194270050303448 5:30 PM369590014001051700122122202161713701553335:45 PM34664001042991700118701038211330355285Hourly Total114332350048164107000486404506496971300520612226:00 PM2383100011617280081160100172011600372516:15 PM18807001052751200895220091311600302336:30 PM1574610963738148590202111311700312236:45 PM206360189056400609130113170180235197Hourly Total763002911406627632143153938035063367021339047:00 PM146081083160401655210181102706381947:15 PM167052093267320747110091921800392157:30 PM13655008304741452503048801404221657:45 PM13479006914670054720019100120022154Hourly Total5624227303284220183524524550634482710101217288:00 PM15343025224270051611008601304191308:15 PM1032410474361014131002470702141068:30 PM13381005203110032301004301305161048:45 PM832100410212002310002110700873Hourly Total46136912192613011011471322041717040011574139:00 PM7291003702252029100001114016739:15 PM9233003512811031000000108009759:30 PM5211002721420018000010305038539:45 PM32700030083001110100210400548Hourly Total241005001293721130892010136121042824910:00 PM160007010400141000011020032510:15 PM47100121620092010031020032710:30 PM2400061410060000001000011310:45 PM1800090190001910000100000029Hourly Total82510034239700484010053040079411:00 PM0310040700070000000010011211:15 PM130004031004000000100001911:30 PM0510060610070000000000001311:45 PM1100021200030010011010028Hourly Total212200161182002100100120200442Grand Total116840493821318561265383564991345584016572044538798521451189230213010Approach %20.872.16.80.2--1.484.114.20.2--74.512.113.40.0--34.72.363.00.0---Total %9.031.12.90.1-43.10.529.55.00.1-35.03.10.50.60.0-4.16.10.411.20.0-17.7-Lights1124396237613-54756337446429-445839865720-5357815114041-223712705% Lights96.297.998.4100.0-97.696.997.698.9100.0-97.899.3100.0100.0--99.497.998.196.8100.0-97.297.7Buses271920-4812010-222000-280320-40112% Buses2.30.50.50.0-0.91.50.50.20.0-0.50.50.00.0--0.41.00.02.20.0-1.70.9Trucks165630-7515960-661000-191150-25167% Trucks1.41.40.80.0-1.31.51.50.90.0-1.40.20.00.0--0.21.11.91.00.0-1.11.3Bicycles on Road11210-1401200-120000-00000-026% Bicycles onRoad0.10.30.30.0-0.20.00.30.00.0-0.30.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.00.0-0.00.2Bicycles onCrosswalk----1-----4-----5-----18--% Bicycles onCrosswalk----5.6-----30.8-----11.4-----20.2--Pedestrians----17-----9-----39-----71--% Pedestrians----94.4-----69.2-----88.6-----79.8--449 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: W 78th St & Laredo BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 405/24/2023 12:00 AMEnding At05/25/2023 12:00 AMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherLaredo Blvd [SB]OutInTotal1832223740692840682225471010001883230241851404517811032080015190000000000089145152798189RTLUP4928 0 12 65 27 4824 Out 4558 0 12 66 22 4458 In 9486 0 24 131 49 9282 Total W 78th St [WB] R 649 0 0 6 1 642 T 3835 0 12 59 20 3744 L 65 0 0 1 1 63 U 9 0 0 0 0 9 P 13 13 0 0 0 0 49053510253255161010004995381037OutInTotalPrivate Driveway [NB]ULTRP0398657200200001000000000000440401657244W 78th St [EB]Total1103410215026011312In547548751405612Out55595475120570013000013U11242716101168L396219561204049T3762310382R00001818PTurning Movement Data Plot450 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: W 78th St & Laredo BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM)Start TimeW 78th StW 78th StPrivate DrivewayLaredo BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total11:00 AM18579008415712007040000414021003519311:15 AM185611008506118007921200515020003520411:30 AM21697009707311008460000614022023622311:45 AM1310150011917618009510130014112240137265Total70283320038522675900328222500295428703143885Approach %18.273.58.30.0--0.681.418.00.0--75.96.917.20.0--37.81.460.80.0---Total %7.932.03.60.0-43.50.230.26.70.0-37.12.50.20.60.0-3.36.10.29.80.0-16.2-PHF0.8330.7000.7270.000-0.8090.5000.8780.8190.000-0.8630.5500.5000.4170.000-0.5180.9000.2500.9060.000-0.9660.835Lights69278310-3782264560-32221250-28512860-139867% Lights98.698.296.9--98.2100.098.994.9--98.295.5100.0100.0--96.694.4100.098.9--97.298.0Buses0000-00000-00000-00000-00% Buses0.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.0Trucks1510-70330-61000-13010-418% Trucks1.41.83.1--1.80.01.15.1--1.84.50.00.0--3.45.60.01.1--2.82.0Bicycles on Road0000-00000-00000-00000-00% Bicycles onRoad0.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.0Bicycles onCrosswalk----0-----0-----0-----0--% Bicycles onCrosswalk----------------------0.0--Pedestrians----0-----0-----0-----3--% Pedestrians----------------------100.0--451 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: W 78th St & Laredo BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 6Peak Hour Data05/24/2023 11:00 AMEnding At05/24/2023 12:00 PMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherLaredo Blvd [SB]OutInTotal1271392660004480000001311432748625100000001030000000000038725403RTLUP342 0 0 8 0 334 Out 328 0 0 6 0 322 In 670 0 0 14 0 656 Total W 78th St [WB] R 59 0 0 3 0 56 T 267 0 0 3 0 264 L 2 0 0 0 0 2 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 352863000112000000362965OutInTotalPrivate Driveway [NB]ULTRP02125000000010000000000000022250W 78th St [EB]Total74901200761In3780700385Out3710500376000000U69010070L2780500283T31010032R000000PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM)452 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: W 78th St & Laredo BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 7Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (4:00 PM)Start TimeW 78th StW 78th StPrivate DrivewayLaredo BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total4:00 PM31861312131199150011562602141823301533134:15 PM29112210016231002300126103001131703500523534:30 PM249515001342911710111112200151423300493094:45 PM1685800109288250011518120021132360151296Total100378571253683788010467458100363626137022051271Approach %18.770.510.60.2--1.780.917.10.2--71.412.715.90.0--30.22.966.80.0---Total %7.929.74.50.1-42.20.629.76.30.1-36.73.50.60.80.0-5.04.90.510.80.0-16.1-PHF0.8060.8440.6790.250-0.8270.6670.9450.8000.250-0.9270.6250.6670.4170.000-0.7500.8610.7500.9510.000-0.9670.900Lights99371571-5288373801-462458100-636161350-2021255% Lights99.098.1100.0100.0-98.5100.098.7100.0100.0-98.9100.0100.0100.0--100.098.4100.098.5--98.598.7Buses0100-10200-20000-01010-25% Buses0.00.30.00.0-0.20.00.50.00.0-0.40.00.00.0--0.01.60.00.7--1.00.4Trucks1500-60200-20000-00010-19% Trucks1.01.30.00.0-1.10.00.50.00.0-0.40.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.7--0.50.7Bicycles on Road0100-10100-10000-00000-02% Bicycles onRoad0.00.30.00.0-0.20.00.30.00.0-0.20.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.2Bicycles onCrosswalk----1-----0-----0-----1--% Bicycles onCrosswalk----50.0-----------0.0-----50.0--Pedestrians----1-----0-----3-----1--% Pedestrians----50.0-----------100.0-----50.0--453 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: W 78th St & Laredo BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 8Peak Hour Data05/24/2023 4:00 PMEnding At05/24/2023 5:00 PMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherLaredo Blvd [SB]OutInTotal187202389022112000000188205393135661001010010000000000000213766202RTLUP451 0 1 5 2 443 Out 467 0 1 2 2 462 In 918 0 2 7 4 905 Total W 78th St [WB] R 80 0 0 0 0 80 T 378 0 1 2 2 373 L 8 0 0 0 0 8 U 1 0 0 0 0 1 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 71631340000000000007163134OutInTotalPrivate Driveway [NB]ULTRP0458100000000000000000000030458103W 78th St [EB]Total108249201097In5281610536Out5543310561100001U990100100L3711510378T57000057R000022PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4:00 PM)454 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: W 78th St & Market BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeW 78th StW 78th StMarket BlvdMarket BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total12:00 AM0510061100022020040000001212:15 AM0120030400042010030000001012:30 AM021003010001001001000000512:45 AM1200030100010020020000006Hourly Total110400151700084060010000000331:00 AM00000000000010000100000011:15 AM01000111000230000300000061:30 AM00020202000211000200000061:45 AM0100010000000000000000001Hourly Total020204130004510006000000142:00 AM00000000000010100200000022:15 AM00000000000010100200000022:30 AM01000100000010000100000022:45 AM0110020000001000010000003Hourly Total02100300000040200600000093:00 AM00000002000231100500000073:15 AM00200210000100000000000033:30 AM01200301000120000202001283:45 AM0210030100014010050000009Hourly Total0350081400059120012020012274:00 AM00300300000000000000000034:15 AM11100300000000000000000034:30 AM01100241000510000110000194:45 AM05300821000310000100001012Hourly Total1780016620008200002100011275:00 AM1450010320005300003000000185:15 AM0550010220004212005200002215:30 AM1540010320005200012040024215:45 AM08100018560001162100900004038Hourly Total22224004813120002513330119240066986:00 AM08130021260008421007032025416:15 AM1121201253500086150012030003486:30 AM0192401436100001610050115121014786:45 AM0272200496220002820390032011012111Hourly Total16671021381743000604062001661940414278455 7:00 AM130410172826000342031700400010011477:15 AM352350090933000421332701430430071827:30 AM56648001193458200942243700632320072837:45 AM34559001072554000793411200065223027258Hourly Total12193183013887617120024989211010121149902228708:00 AM3513400881131100433221800520030331868:15 AM463372010631580008927727006114505102668:30 AM24746009517661008440131300663150792548:45 AM8675410130184730068407240071123016275Hourly Total1722817130419772025002841392982002505716016289819:00 AM63648019013475006547714006834603132369:15 AM65552201152150100723952202663410182619:30 AM6423440862344300703982701740620282389:45 AM106250101231552102684771703713610010272Hourly Total2819518471414721931002275172278006279920100639100710:00 AM55839101031945101654511250081262011025910:15 AM8593240103205320075439140166258001525910:30 AM4483830932158100804811210180179021727010:45 AM1161373011231643009845928008201350218310Hourly Total2822614611041191220701318181408802309531240560109811:00 AM175245311172753100817282800108259011632211:15 AM1161604113635491008567923019961111002834811:30 AM968552013428646009860112600973715022535411:45 AM788704016931773001116772400983590317395Hourly Total44269230132556121243110037526635101014021428440686141912:00 PM13866130163397250211677121800107357021540112:15 PM98068511623382100116739300011211213042641612:30 PM1377686016427752001045662400863125002037412:45 PM1290604016642605011077816270112126130121415Hourly Total47333257181655141289130344328443990142693538078216061:00 PM666555013235766021177773504119171300213891:15 PM665655014125714001007582701110271500243751:30 PM12726830155187040092531118028248503173461:45 PM12784460140237100094621534001111630010355Hourly Total362812321905681012881402403267411140742282836037214652:00 PM966478013030794011137464500125461101213892:15 PM572633014349982011496710340011158303164192:30 PM670556013736791001166111370110934900163782:45 PM6773640123407630011977434021156990024381Hourly Total2628520121053315533210024972793115003460182732047715673:00 PM879562114541903001346793200108671000234103:15 PM469658114638101200141711136001186191401394443:30 PM871648015144931001387813340012517402124263:45 PM6777083161431042001498983400131032025446Hourly Total262962552656031663888005623054113600482133630057917264:00 PM7106693018536956021378112350112816901164664:15 PM91065661177459820114584945001384111002254854:30 PM489773317340892001317874300128210802204524:45 PM882656016145993001476542700961660013417Hourly Total283832671846961663811303560308321500149083333057418205:00 PM77346110137449920014582113700130371002204325:15 PM8776090154311043001388816400014447100221457456 5:30 PM12105672518633115401152827300411934803154725:45 PM38170421583991602136741229001151690316425Hourly Total30336243267635147409150357132646136045081124370107217866:00 PM5647561150267700010364742001132330083746:15 PM5805410014927671019579423001061030043546:30 PM472686015019781009872727031061030043586:45 PM26065101282161100836032700902350010311Hourly Total162762622315779328330137927521119034156614002613977:00 PM256523111328660009454424008219406143037:15 PM17446411252071200935221802721530392997:30 PM45345101031944300664002201622020042357:45 PM258492011119490026841312005611010012247Hourly Total9241192102452862305023211879760327252410093910848:00 PM142410084124510058442100056011102122108:15 PM2303120651532000474121402570160071768:30 PM243242071113410046233901350030031558:45 PM02416004082100029302190151030003123Hourly Total5139112402604613220018013895204199052002256649:00 PM02727005491800027282802381110031229:15 PM02513013863100137201800290100311059:30 PM0191430366120001815190025002022819:45 PM025902344900013903001201001160Hourly Total0966333162257000195724280210413306736810:00 PM0670213580001355000100310044010:15 PM0840012280001080400120100013510:30 PM15500111220054110060010012310:45 PM07300104160002030200500000035Hourly Total1261902461234200482067003304200613311:00 PM0270094500095020070100012611:15 PM02400600000080200100010011711:30 PM0330062400062030050000001711:45 PM01200303000350100602300517Hourly Total08160024612000182008002803400777Grand Total3583923314620431763116203948120020568834054461560040541112033836609882419554Approach %4.751.441.22.7--28.569.42.10.0--62.98.228.80.0--14.641.044.40.0---Total %1.820.116.11.0-39.08.320.20.60.0-29.117.42.38.00.0-27.70.61.71.90.0-4.2-Lights35638273091204-7478158738541180-5559335543915250-53191203343560-81019166% Lights99.497.698.3100.0-98.098.097.698.3--97.798.598.497.8--98.3100.098.897.3--98.398.0Buses02750-32262500-5131150-190000-0102% Buses0.00.70.20.0-0.41.60.60.0--0.90.10.21.0--0.40.00.00.0--0.00.5Trucks254490-10576010-68475200-720450-9254% Trucks0.61.41.60.0-1.40.41.50.8--1.21.41.11.3--1.30.01.21.4--1.11.3Bicycles on Road01510-160910-100100-10050-532% Bicycles onRoad0.00.40.00.0-0.20.00.20.8--0.20.00.20.0--0.00.00.01.4--0.60.2Bicycles onCrosswalk----12-----7-----9-----18--% Bicycles onCrosswalk----38.7-----35.0-----22.5-----18.4--Pedestrians----19-----13-----31-----80--% Pedestrians----61.3-----65.0-----77.5-----81.6--457 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: W 78th St & Market BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 405/24/2023 12:00 AMEnding At05/25/2023 12:00 AMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherMarket Blvd [SB]OutInTotal91381017231018917257000924824174835633412000000005400050000000098366338120098RTLUP5603 0 15 74 42 5472 Out 5688 0 10 68 51 5559 In 11291 0 25 142 93 11031 Total W 78th St [WB] R 120 0 1 1 0 118 T 3948 0 9 60 25 3854 L 1620 0 0 7 26 1587 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 20 20 0 0 0 0 501253191033131195060721321120005104541110515OutInTotalMarket Blvd [NB]ULTRP033554391525003115004752000010000004003405446156040W 78th St [EB]Total152476021730015554In7478321051607631Out77692811214079232040000204U3560200358L382727541503923T3091549103146R00003131PTurning Movement Data Plot458 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: W 78th St & Market BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 5Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (11:00 AM)Start TimeW 78th StW 78th StMarket BlvdMarket BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total11:00 AM175245311172753100817282800108259011632211:15 AM1161604113635491008567923019961111002834811:30 AM968552013428646009860112600973715022535411:45 AM788704016931773001116772400983590317395Total442692301325561212431100375266351010140214284406861419Approach %7.948.441.42.3--32.364.82.90.0--66.28.725.10.0--16.332.651.20.0---Total %3.119.016.20.9-39.28.517.10.80.0-26.418.72.57.10.0-28.31.02.03.10.0-6.1-PHF0.6470.7640.8210.813-0.8220.8640.7890.4580.000-0.8450.9240.7950.9020.000-0.9310.5830.6360.7330.000-0.7680.898Lights4426322713-547121238110-37026335980-3961428440-861399% Lights100.097.898.7100.0-98.4100.097.9100.0--98.798.9100.097.0--98.5100.0100.0100.0--100.098.6Buses0000-00000-00000-00000-00% Buses0.00.00.00.0-0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.0Trucks0530-80500-53030-60000-019% Trucks0.01.91.30.0-1.40.02.10.0--1.31.10.03.0--1.50.00.00.0--0.01.3Bicycles on Road0100-10000-00000-00000-01% Bicycles onRoad0.00.40.00.0-0.20.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.1Bicycles onCrosswalk----1-----0-----0-----2--% Bicycles onCrosswalk----50.0-----------0.0-----33.3--Pedestrians----1-----0-----1-----4--% Pedestrians----50.0-----------100.0-----66.7--459 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: W 78th St & Market BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 6Peak Hour Data05/24/2023 11:00 AMEnding At05/24/2023 12:00 PMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherMarket Blvd [SB]OutInTotal90861760000000000009086176442814000000000000000000000644281406RTLUP384 0 1 8 0 375 Out 375 0 0 5 0 370 In 759 0 1 13 0 745 Total W 78th St [WB] R 11 0 0 0 0 11 T 243 0 0 5 0 238 L 121 0 0 0 0 121 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 376396772000369000000379402781OutInTotalMarket Blvd [NB]ULTRP026335980000000303000000000010266351011W 78th St [EB]Total1105016101122In5470810556Out558080056613000013U44000044L2630510269T2270300230R000022PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (11:00 AM)460 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: W 78th St & Market BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 7Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (3:45 PM)Start TimeW 78th StW 78th StMarket BlvdMarket BlvdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalLeftThruRightU-TurnPedsApp.TotalInt. Total3:45 PM67770831614310420014989834001310320254464:00 PM7106693018536956021378112350112816901164664:15 PM91065661177459820114584945001384111002254854:30 PM48977331734089200131787430012821080220452Total26378272207696164386120356233236157015257302907661849Approach %3.754.339.12.9--29.268.72.10.0--63.26.929.90.0--10.645.543.90.0---Total %1.420.414.71.1-37.68.920.90.60.0-30.418.01.98.50.0-28.40.41.61.60.0-3.6-PHF0.7220.8920.8830.625-0.9410.9110.9280.5000.000-0.9430.9330.7500.8720.000-0.9510.4380.6820.7250.000-0.6600.953Lights2636927020-685161382110-554330361550-521730290-661826% Lights100.097.699.3100.0-98.498.299.091.7--98.699.4100.098.7--99.2100.0100.0100.0--100.098.8Buses0200-22000-20000-00000-04% Buses0.00.50.00.0-0.31.20.00.0--0.40.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.2Trucks0620-81310-52020-40000-017% Trucks0.01.60.70.0-1.10.60.88.3--0.90.60.01.3--0.80.00.00.0--0.00.9Bicycles on Road0100-10100-10000-00000-02% Bicycles onRoad0.00.30.00.0-0.10.00.30.0--0.20.00.00.0--0.00.00.00.0--0.00.1Bicycles onCrosswalk----2-----1-----0-----2--% Bicycles onCrosswalk----28.6-----33.3-----0.0-----28.6--Pedestrians----5-----2-----1-----5--% Pedestrians----71.4-----66.7-----100.0-----71.4--461 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.4201 Winfield Road Suite 600Warrenville, Illinois, United States 60555(630) 487-5550 tim.klockziem@kimley-horn.comCount Name: W 78th St & Market BlvdSite Code:Start Date: 05/24/2023Page No: 8Peak Hour Data05/24/2023 3:45 PMEnding At05/24/2023 4:45 PMLightsBusesTrucksBicycles on RoadOtherMarket Blvd [SB]OutInTotal736613900010100000074661402930700000000000000000000072930707RTLUP542 0 1 8 2 531 Out 562 0 1 5 2 554 In 1104 0 2 13 4 1085 Total W 78th St [WB] R 12 0 0 1 0 11 T 386 0 1 3 0 382 L 164 0 0 1 2 161 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 3 3 0 0 0 0 461521982202347000000466525991OutInTotalMarket Blvd [NB]ULTRP0330361550000000202000000000010332361571W 78th St [EB]Total1446213201463In6852810696Out761051076720000020U26000026L3692610378T2700200272R000077PTurning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (3:45 PM)462 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 C.Proposed Development Site Plan 15 463 ACCESS EASEMENTUTILITY EASEMENTCHANHASSEN CINEMAHIGH TIMBER LOUNGECOUNTRY INN AND SUITESUTILITY EASEMENTSUTILITY EASEMENTPUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYACCESS DRIVESHOPPING CENTERVENUE APARTMENTS(6 STORIES)ALDI(1 STORY)CHANHASSEN STATIONCHANHASSEN DINNER THEATERSMARKET BLVDW 78TH STMARKET STLAREDO DRJIMMY JOHNSSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense #DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota1/19/2024 8:07:41 PMA.01EXISTING CONDITIONS SITEPLANProject NumberAuthorChecker08/14/23Market Blvd & W 78th StMarket Blvd & W78th StChanhassen, MNLAND USEAPPLICATION1/19/2024No. Description Date 464 VENUE APARTMENTS (6 STORIES) ALDI (1 STORY) CHANHASSEN STATION CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATERS 974 977 964 960 973 ROOFROOFMARKET BLVDW 78TH ST MARKET ST PET EXERCISE PROPOSED CURB LOCATION EXISTING CURB LOCATION AREA WELL FOR MECH EXHAUST 971 972 976 RETAINING WALL 964 6 STORY BUILDING 5 STORY BUILDING COURTYARD AT LEVEL 2 COURTYARD AT LEVEL 2 5 STORY BUILDINGLAREDO DRJIMMY JOHNS FUTURE LOREDO DRIVE EXTENSION6,669 SF AMENITY 1,448 SF RETAIL 1,581 SF RETAIL PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT 5 STORIES 5 STORIES 5 STORIES 1 STORY 2 STORIES Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1/21/2024 3:23:32 PMA.02 DISTRICT SITE PLAN Project Number Author Checker 05/02/23 Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 No. Description Date OVERALL BUILDING METRICS 465 ROOFROOFPET EXERCISEPROPOSED CURB LOCATIONEXISTING CURB LOCATIONAREA WELL FOR MECH EXHAUSTRETAINING WALLFUTURE LOREDO DRIVE EXTENSIONVENUE APARTMENTS(6 STORIES)ALDI(1 STORY)CHANHASSEN STATIONCHANHASSEN DINNER THEATERSMARKET BLVDW 78TH STMARKET STLAREDO DRJIMMY JOHNSRESTAURANTLOBBYRETAILRETAILRESIDENTIAL (TOWNHOMES)GUEST/CUSTOMER PARKINGRESIDENT PARKINGLOBBYRETAILGUEST/CUSTOMER PARKINGTERRACEPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENTRETAILSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense #DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota1/19/2024 8:08:13 PMA.03DISTRICT STREET LEVELPLANProject NumberAuthorChecker01/16/24Market Blvd & W 78th StMarket Blvd & W78th StChanhassen, MNLAND USEAPPLICATION1/19/2024No. Description Date 466 974 27,315 SF RETAIL/GUEST PARKING 3,981 SF RETAIL W 78TH ST 1,854 SF RETAIL4,453 SF RESTAURANT PATIO 964' 975' 976' 3,057 SF LOBBY / LEASING 1,063 SF TRASH 975 976 977 977 974 972 977'-0" 101'-0" 971 980'-0"980'-0"3.23%3.23%977'-0"977'-0" 977'-0" [No Slope] [No Slope] FOUNDATION WALL BELOW 1,565 SF RETAIL 972 100'-0"100'-0"5.00%976'-0"976'-0" ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS PROPOSED CURB LOCATION EXISTING CURB LOCATION 10' - 2"16' - 11"15' - 3"12' - 9"10' - 7"16' - 4"14' - 11"EMERGENCY GENERATOR 976'-0" 18,121 SF RESIDENT PARKING1,554 SF 9' - 0" 9' - 0" 9' - 0"18' - 0" 26' - 0" 18' - 0" 9' - 0" 9' - 0" 9' - 0"18' - 0"PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT 1 BR + D 2 BR 1 BR + D 2 BR 1,554 SF 3,463 SF RESIDENTIAL 5,232 SF AMENITY 1,323 SF AMENITY POOL ACTIVE AMENITY TERRACE 9' - 8"6' - 10"25' - 2"8' - 4"8' - 4" 3' - 4"14' - 10"9,672 SF RESIDENTIAL 6,772 SF 15,403 SF RESIDENTIAL 8,256 SF RESIDENTIAL 1 BR + D 2 BR 1 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 1 BR 2 BR 1 BR 2 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR 1 BR 3 BR 1 BR + D 1 BR STUDIOSTUDIO 1 BR 1 BR STUDIO 2 BR 3 BR 1 BR 3 BR 2 BR 1 BR + D31' - 10"31' - 10"2 BR 1 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 1 BR 2 BR 1 BR 2 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR 1 BR 3 BR 1 BR + D 1 BR STUDIOSTUDIO 1 BR 1 BR STUDIO 2 BR 3 BR 1 BR 1 BR + D 3 BR 2 BR 1 BR 2 BR 2 BR 1 BR 2 BR 1 BR + D 2 BR 6,469 SF 14,336 SF RESIDENTIAL 15,403 SF RESIDENTIAL 9,801 SF RESIDENTIAL7' - 10"SKY DECK 1,166 SF AMENITY 1 BR + D 1 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 1 BR 2 BR 1 BR 2 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR 1 BR 3 BR 1 BR + D 1 BR STUDIOSTUDIO 1 BR 1 BR STUDIO 2 BR 1 BR + D 2 BR 1 BR 7,245 SF RESIDENTIAL 6,847 SF RESIDENTIAL 15,403 SF RESIDENTIAL 5,514 SF 28' - 8"9' - 8"10' - 10"50,227 SF PARKING RETAIL ABOVE (UNEXCAVATED) MOVE IN3.87%5.94%5.56%93'-4" 93'-4"3.87%5.95% PERIMETER OF BUILDING ABOVE ELEC 18' - 0"26' - 0"18' - 0"9' - 0" 9' - 0" 9' - 0" 27' - 0" 26' - 8"26' - 0"LOWER LEVEL OF 2-STORY TOWNHOME LOWER LEVEL OF 2-STORY TOWNHOME 1,441 SF RESIDENTIAL 38,423 SF PARKING 3.23%3.23%5.56%82'-2" 79'-8" GARAGE MUA GARAGE EXHAUST18' - 0" 26' - 0" 9' - 0" 9' - 0" 9' - 0" Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1/21/2024 2:14:14 PMA.10 WEST BUILDING - FLOOR PLANS Project Number Author Checker 12/01/23 Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 1/32" = 1'-0"A.10 1 STREET LEVEL PLAN 1/32" = 1'-0"A.10 2 LEVEL 2 PLAN 1/32" = 1'-0"A.10 3 TYPICAL UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/32" = 1'-0"A.10 4 LEVEL 6 PLAN 1/32" = 1'-0"A.10 5 MINUS 1 LEVEL 1/32" = 1'-0"A.10 6 MINUS 2 LEVEL 1/32" = 1'-0"A.10 7 ROOF LEVEL No. Description Date WEST BUILDING UNIT MATRIX 467 11'3456789111314BCDEFGF.5HJA.11211.32.5AA.297496427,229 SFRETAIL/GUEST PARKING3,981 SFRETAILMARKET BLVDW 78TH ST1,854 SFRETAIL4,453 SFRESTAURANTJIMMY JOHN'SFUTURE LAREDO STREET EXTENSION2BR/2.5BA TOWNHOME(1490 SF)PATIO3,057 SFLOBBY / LEASING1,063 SFTRASH975976977977974972977.00'101'-0"971980.00'980.00'3.23%3.23%3.23%977.00'977.00'[No Slope][No Slope]FOUNDATION WALL BELOW1,565 SFRETAIL972968100'-0"100'-0"5.00%976.00'976.00'GARAGE EXHAUST AREA WELLPROPOSED CURB LOCATIONEXISTING CURB LOCATION10' - 2"10' - 2"10' - 2"10' - 2"16' - 11"16' - 11"16' - 11"16' - 11"15' - 3"15' - 3"15' - 3"15' - 3"12' - 9"12' - 9"12' - 9"12' - 9"10' - 7"10' - 7"10' - 7"10' - 7"16' - 4"16' - 4"16' - 4"16' - 4"14' - 11"14' - 11"14' - 11"14' - 11"2A.151A.151.32BUILDING PERIMETER ABOVEGARAGE MAKE UP AIR INTAKE LOUVERTRASH ROOMBELOW-GRADE STORMWATER STRUCTURESELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERSEMERGENCY GENERATORMOVE IN ROUTE100'-0"98'-0"974.00'2BR WALK-UP(1015 SF)20' - 8"20' - 8"20' - 8"20' - 8"976PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT2BR/2.5BA TOWNHOME(1490 SF)2BR WALK-UP(1015 SF)977.00'977.00'TYPICAL BAYTYPICAL BAYTYPICAL BAYTYPICAL BAY29' - 0"29' - 0"29' - 0"29' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"27' - 0"PARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALL18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"DRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLE26' - 0"26' - 0"26' - 0"26' - 0"PARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALL18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"PARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALL18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"DRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLE26' - 0"26' - 0"26' - 0"26' - 0"PARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALL18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"PARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALL18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"DRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLE26' - 0"26' - 0"26' - 0"26' - 0"PARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALL18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"DRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLE26' - 0"26' - 0"26' - 0"26' - 0"PARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALL18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"16' - 0"16' - 0"16' - 0"16' - 0"PARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALLPARKING STALL18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"DRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLEDRIVE AISLE26' - 0"26' - 0"26' - 0"26' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"SignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense #DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota1/19/2024 8:08:33 PMA.11WEST BUILDING - STREETLEVEL PLAN ENLARGEDProject NumberAuthorChecker05/19/23Market Blvd & W 78th StMarket Blvd & W78th StChanhassen, MNLAND USEAPPLICATION1/19/2024DOWNTONW MIXED USE CHARACTERHIGH QUALITY ARCHITECTURE WITH GROUND LEVEL RETAIL ALONG WEST 78TH STREET, UPPER LEVEL RESIDENTIAL OR OFFICE, BUILDINGS TOWARDS THE STREET, PARKING IN THE REAR, PEDESTRIAN FOCUSED.SEC 20-732 PERMITTED USESWHEN A MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING USE HAS FRONTAGE ON WEST 78TH STREET, A PORTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL INCORPORATE A RESTAURANT, ENTERTAINMENT, COMMERCIAL SERVICE, COMMERCIAL RETAIL, BREWERY, BREW PUB, OR MICRODISTILLERY USE.SEC 20-736 LOT REQUIREMENTSNO MINIMUM LOT AREA, FRONTAGE, OR DEPTHNO MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGESEC 20-737 SETBACK AND HEIGHT RESTRICTIONSFRONT YARD BUILD TO ZONE: 0' -15No. Description Date 468 DNFUTURE LAREDO STREET EXTENSION2,353 SF TERRACE 6,669 SF AMENITY 974' 1,448 SF RETAIL 4,265 SFTERRACE2,313 SFTERRACE976.00' 100'-0" 962.00 961.00 961.00 SLOPE SLOPE EARTH TO MATCH STEPS 960.00 103'-4" 100'-0" 100'-0" 103'-4" 103'-4" 3,061 SF 16,952 SF RESIDENTIAL 1,581 SF RETAIL 1 BR 2 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR STUDIO STUDIO1 BR 2 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR STUDIO 1 BR 1 BR 3 BR 2 BR 24,831 SF RESIDENTIAL 1,918 SF TERRACE 3 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 1 BR 2 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR STUDIO STUDIO1 BR 2 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR STUDIO 1 BR 1 BR STUDIO 2 BR 3 BR 2 BR 3,218 SF 24,850 SF RESIDENTIAL 3,193 SF 3 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 1 BR 2 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR STUDIO STUDIO1 BR 2 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR STUDIO 1 BR 1 BR STUDIO 2 BR 3 BR 2 BR 29,426 SF PARKING VENUE APARTMENTS PARKING 3,279 SF RESIDENTIAL 678 SF TRASH/REC 30' - 0" 31' - 0" 28' - 0" 895 SF 963'-0" 963'-0" 963'-0" 964'-8"3.79%964'-8" 962.00 961.00 963'-0" 963'-0" 961.00 1:12 963'-0" 962'-0" 962'-0" 2 BR 1 BR STUDIO 1 BR 23,413 SF RESIDENTIAL 3,408 SF 640 SF AMENITY 577 SF TERRACE 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 1 BR 2 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR STUDIO STUDIO1 BR 2 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR STUDIO 1 BR 1 BR STUDIO 2 BR 3 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR 1 BR 2 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR STUDIO STUDIO1 BR 2 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR STUDIO 1 BR 1 BR STUDIO 2 BR 3 BR 2 BR RoomRoomRoom 1/32" = 1'-0"A.20 3 LEVEL 2 PLAN (LUA) Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1/21/2024 2:45:52 PMA.20 EAST BUILDING - FLOOR PLANS Project Number Author Checker 12/07/23 Market Blvd & W 78th St - East Building Market Blvd & W 78th St -East Building Chanhassen, MN Project Status 1/32" = 1'-0"A.20 1 MINUS 1 LEVEL (LUA) 1/32" = 1'-0"A.20 4 TYPICAL UPPER LEVEL 3-4 PLAN (LUA) 1/32" = 1'-0"A.20 6 ROOF PLAN No. Description Date 1/32" = 1'-0"A.20 2 STREET LEVEL PLAN (LUA) EAST BUILDING UNIT MATRIX 1/32" = 1'-0"A.20 5 LEVEL 5 469 16,952 SFRESIDENTIAL2,353 SFTERRACE6,669 SFAMENITY974'1,448 SFRETAIL4,265 SFTERRACE2,313 SFTERRACE979.33'103'-4"976.00'100'-0"3BR1438962.00961.00961.00SLOPESLOPE EARTH TO MATCH STEPS960.00103'-4"100'-0"100'-0"103'-4"103'-4"100'-0"1,581 SFRETAILSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense #DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota1/19/2024 7:46:26 PMA.21EAST BUILDING - STREETLEVEL PLAN ENLARGEDProject NumberAuthorChecker12/07/23Market Blvd & W 78th St -East BuildingMarket Blvd & W78th St -EastBuildingChanhassen, MNProject Status1/16" = 1'-0"A.211STREET LEVEL PLAN (LUA)No. Description Date 470 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 D.Market Boulevard Corridor Plans 16 471 993 982 989 989 986 985 984 983 989 987 988 990 991 986 985 984 983 981 980979 980 981 980 976 977 978 979 982.5 FFE CB 981.9 982 982 981 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 3.5% 982.5 985 LIBRARY DROP OFF CITY HALL SKATING RINK PARK PAVILLION SPLASH FOUNTAINPLAYGROUND VETERAN'S MEMORIAL STAGE SEATING SURFACE PARKING PARALLEL PARKINGS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S NO PARKINGNO PARKING10' BLVD6' TRAIL16' THRU9' MEDIAN12' THRU12' R TURN5' BLVD10' TRAIL11' L TURN12' THRU13' THRU7' TRAIL18' THRU18' THRU7' TRAIL15' BLVD6' TRAIL16' THRU16' THRU12' BLVD10' TRAIL15' BLVD6' TRAIL16' THRU21' MEDIAN16' THRU10' TRAIL6' BLVD6' TRAIL12' R TURN13' L TURN4' MEDIAN16' THRU8' BLVD10' TRAIL9' BLVD6' TRA IL16' THRU4' MED IAN13' L TURN11' THRU12' R TURN7' BLVD6 ' TRA IL 16 ' THRU 18 ' CLEAR 16 ' THRU9' BLVD 1 0 ' TRA I L 1 0 ' B L V D 6' T R A I L 1 6 ' T H R U 1 8 ' M E D I A N 1 6 ' T H R U 9' B L V D 1 0 ' T R A I L 6' B L VD 6' TRA I L 1 2 ' THRU 1 1 ' THRU 6' MED I AN 1 6 ' T H R U 1 2 ' B L V D10' TRAIL6' BLVD6' TRAIL12' THRU11' THRU6' MED IAN12' THRU12' THRU4' BLVD10' TRA IL16' MEDIAN12' THRU10' TRA IL 1 2 ' L TURN 12' L TURN12' L TURN12' R TURN8' BLVDSTORM WATER TREATMENT BASIN LEGEND ROADWAY PAVEMENT GRASS BOULEVARD SIDEWALK OR BITUMINOUS TRAIL CURB & GUTTER STORM WATER RETENTION BASIN PROJECT LAYOUT February 2024 MARKET BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS 472 Chanhassen Apartments – Chanhassen, MN Traffic Impact Analysis │ March 2024 E.SimTraffic and Rodel Analysis 17 473 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing (2023) AM Peak Hour 10/27/2023 Downtown Chanhassen Existing AM SimTraffic Report Page 1 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)9.2 9.8 3.7 8.9 5.0 2.6 18.1 13.6 5.9 13.8 14.7 3.6 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)8.2 7: Market Blvd & Market Square North Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 4.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)8.7 3.4 8.6 8.1 2.9 0.6 0.2 3.3 0.8 0.5 1.3 8: Market Blvd & Market St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)10.2 3.6 6.8 2.9 3.4 1.4 1.1 4.1 0.4 0.2 1.2 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 3.8 0.2 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)7.7 4.8 3.1 5.2 5.0 2.0 24.9 15.7 6.3 25.1 18.4 5.3 14: Great Plains Blvd & Market St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)4.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)5.8 2.7 6.8 3.5 2.5 0.5 0.3 3.5 1.3 1.1 1.7 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)7.2 474 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing (2023) AM Peak Hour 10/27/2023 Downtown Chanhassen Existing AM SimTraffic Report Page 2 Intersection: 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 41 145 104 105 99 86 160 112 31 52 Average Queue (ft)7 64 43 42 25 29 64 43 3 17 95th Queue (ft)28 118 78 84 66 67 127 87 17 44 Link Distance (ft)508 508 343 343 296 296 330 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)65 75 65 Storage Blk Time (%)0 7 1 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1 0 0 Intersection: 7: Market Blvd & Market Square North Driveway Movement EB EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LT R LTR LT LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 44 27 39 34 45 8 Average Queue (ft)17 9 12 3 3 0 95th Queue (ft)40 28 37 19 23 4 Link Distance (ft)288 148 219 296 296 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Market Blvd & Market St Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LT TR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 33 45 62 4 80 Average Queue (ft)8 16 10 0 5 95th Queue (ft)30 43 44 3 34 Link Distance (ft)86 695 512 512 219 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 475 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing (2023) AM Peak Hour 10/27/2023 Downtown Chanhassen Existing AM SimTraffic Report Page 3 Intersection: 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB SB SB Directions Served L TR L T TR LTR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 98 135 24 93 70 61 105 132 Average Queue (ft)25 39 2 26 27 21 38 48 95th Queue (ft)68 101 13 70 64 52 76 91 Link Distance (ft)343 428 428 102 310 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 85 70 Storage Blk Time (%)0 2 0 2 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 0 2 1 Intersection: 14: Great Plains Blvd & Market St Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LT R LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 38 35 69 27 6 26 Average Queue (ft)13 11 23 2 0 3 95th Queue (ft)36 31 52 13 4 15 Link Distance (ft)308 164 215 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)115 85 95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 476 10/27/2023 Downtown Chanhassen Existing PM SimTraffic Report Page 1 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.1 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)11.8 15.3 4.7 14.2 9.9 6.3 29.0 16.9 8.2 18.7 19.6 7.2 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)14.2 7: Market Blvd & Market Square North Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 0.4 3.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)19.5 16.1 6.4 18.5 25.4 8.2 5.3 2.0 0.3 4.7 1.4 0.7 7: Market Blvd & Market Square North Driveway Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)4.1 8: Market Blvd & Market St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)19.8 23.0 4.9 17.8 8.2 6.4 2.8 1.3 5.6 0.8 0.5 3.0 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing (2023) PM Peak Hour 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 3.8 0.4 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)9.4 6.0 3.8 7.6 6.0 3.5 25.4 32.6 14.7 28.0 22.2 6.4 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)8.1 14: Great Plains Blvd & Market St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)4.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)7.8 3.3 10.0 12.6 4.7 2.7 0.3 0.2 4.1 1.1 0.9 1.5 477 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing (2023) PM Peak Hour 10/27/2023 Downtown Chanhassen Existing PM SimTraffic Report Page 2 Intersection: 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 121 222 96 130 117 165 293 144 31 94 Average Queue (ft)21 108 48 61 55 66 151 60 5 33 95th Queue (ft)69 184 82 101 105 123 255 113 23 73 Link Distance (ft)508 508 343 343 296 296 330 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)1 Storage Bay Dist (ft)65 75 65 Storage Blk Time (%)0 19 5 4 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 6 10 6 0 Intersection: 7: Market Blvd & Market Square North Driveway Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LT R LTR LT TR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 95 91 74 132 31 66 18 Average Queue (ft)39 39 30 36 1 10 1 95th Queue (ft)73 72 60 99 23 41 10 Link Distance (ft)288 148 219 219 296 296 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)100 Storage Blk Time (%)0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 8: Market Blvd & Market St Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LT TR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 86 67 189 118 64 Average Queue (ft)39 30 52 7 7 95th Queue (ft)71 56 125 61 35 Link Distance (ft)86 695 512 512 219 Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 478 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing (2023) PM Peak Hour 10/27/2023 Downtown Chanhassen Existing PM SimTraffic Report Page 3 Intersection: 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB SB SB Directions Served L TR L T TR LTR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 94 168 30 135 125 99 89 122 Average Queue (ft)29 57 5 56 56 42 39 49 95th Queue (ft)69 138 23 113 108 79 72 87 Link Distance (ft)343 428 428 102 310 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 85 70 Storage Blk Time (%)0 3 2 2 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 3 0 3 1 Intersection: 14: Great Plains Blvd & Market St Movement EB EB WB NB SB Directions Served LT R LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 27 37 79 32 30 Average Queue (ft)7 16 28 4 6 95th Queue (ft)25 37 53 21 24 Link Distance (ft)308 164 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)115 85 95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 479 SimTraffic Performance Report 2045 No-Build - AM Peak Hour 02/19/2024 2045 No-Build - AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Page 1 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)3.5 0.9 3.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)10.1 10.7 4.3 10.0 6.7 2.2 19.6 12.7 4.4 21.6 13.5 3.4 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)1.0 Total Del/Veh (s)8.9 8: Market Blvd & Market St Performance by movement Movement EBR WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 3.6 0.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 Total Del/Veh (s)3.4 3.2 3.1 0.3 0.2 2.8 0.3 0.2 0.6 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 3.9 0.6 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)8.4 5.3 3.6 10.5 6.3 2.1 21.4 19.8 5.9 23.6 23.0 5.7 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)7.8 14: Great Plains Blvd & Market St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)4.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)9.2 3.3 6.9 3.3 3.0 0.2 0.2 3.6 1.0 1.0 1.7 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)1.3 Total Del/Veh (s)88.2 480 Queuing and Blocking Report 2045 No-Build - AM Peak Hour 02/19/2024 2045 No-Build - AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Page 2 Intersection: 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T R L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft)55 178 131 102 132 24 141 42 68 29 36 Average Queue (ft)15 71 49 42 50 2 65 13 29 3 10 95th Queue (ft)43 136 85 79 103 13 118 34 55 17 28 Link Distance (ft)541 326 326 288 330 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)65 65 75 200 150 65 Storage Blk Time (%)0 8 2 1 2 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 22 5 2 2 0 Intersection: 8: Market Blvd & Market St Movement EB WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served R R L T R L R Maximum Queue (ft)20 68 47 4 4 47 4 Average Queue (ft)4 22 12 0 0 6 0 95th Queue (ft)16 53 39 3 3 29 3 Link Distance (ft)184 690 323 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 160 95 120 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB SB SB Directions Served L TR L T TR LTR L TR Maximum Queue (ft)91 148 34 116 54 58 105 102 Average Queue (ft)28 42 3 44 15 21 41 52 95th Queue (ft)67 99 19 99 45 49 80 89 Link Distance (ft)326 1314 1314 87 310 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 85 70 Storage Blk Time (%)0 1 2 3 2 Queuing Penalty (veh)1 1 0 4 1 481 Queuing and Blocking Report 2045 No-Build - AM Peak Hour 02/19/2024 2045 No-Build - AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Page 3 Intersection: 14: Great Plains Blvd & Market St Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LT R LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft)52 73 74 34 3 25 Average Queue (ft)20 27 28 7 0 4 95th Queue (ft)48 56 59 28 2 19 Link Distance (ft)315 168 517 517 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)115 95 Storage Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 39 482 Page 1 of 3Report dated 19-Feb-2024 Rodel Version 1.96 Scheme: 2045 NB Run number 78 Project: Market Blvd2045 AM Peak 85% Confidence Level Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry Operational Data Main Geometry (ft) Approach and Entry Geometry Leg Leg Names Approach Bearing (deg) Grade Separation G Half Width V Approach Lanes n Entry Width E Entry Lanes n Flare Length L' Entry Radius R Entry Angle Phi 1 NB Market Blvd 0 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 2 WB Market Square 90 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 3 SB Market Blvd 180 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 4 EB Market Square 270 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 Circulating and Exit Geometry Leg Leg Names Inscribed Diameter D Circulating Width C Circulating Lanes nc Exit Width Ex Exit Lanes nex Exit Half Width Vx Exit Half Width Lanes nvx 1 NB Market Blvd 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 2 WB Market Square 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 3 SB Market Blvd 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 4 EB Market Square 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 Capacity Modifiers and Capacity Calibration (veh/hr) Leg Leg Names Entry Capacity Capacity + or - XWalk Factor Entry Calibration Intercept + or - Slope Factor Approach Road V (ft) Default Capacity Calib Capacity Exit Road V (ft) Default Capacity Calib Capacity 1 NB Market Blvd 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 2 WB Market Square 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 3 SB Market Blvd 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 4 EB Market Square 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 483 Page 2 of 3Report dated 19-Feb-2024 Rodel Version 1.96 Scheme: 2045 NB Run number 78 Project: Market Blvd2045 AM Peak 85% Confidence Level Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry Operational Results 2045 AM Peak - 60 minutes Flows and Capacity Leg Leg Names Bypass Type Flows (veh/hr) Arrival Flow Entry Bypass Opposing Flow Entry Bypass Exit Flow Capacity (veh/hr) Capacity Entry Bypass Average VCR Entry Bypass 1 NB Market Blvd None 299 50 366 947 0.3159 2 WB Market Square None 54 327 22 781 0.0691 3 SB Market Blvd None 368 76 305 950 0.3872 4 EB Market Square None 56 360 84 802 0.0698 Delays, Queues and Level of Service Leg Leg Names Bypass Type Average Delay (sec) Entry Bypass Leg 95% Queue (veh) Entry Bypass Level of Service Entry Bypass Leg 1 NB Market Blvd None 5.37 5.37 1.47 A A 2 WB Market Square None 4.77 4.77 0.22 A A 3 SB Market Blvd None 6.05 6.05 1.93 A A 4 EB Market Square None 4.78 4.78 0.22 A A 484 Page 3 of 3Report dated 19-Feb-2024 Rodel Version 1.96 Scheme: 2045 NB Run number 78 Project: Market Blvd2045 AM Peak 85% Confidence Level Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry Global Results Performance and Accidents 2045 AM Peak Global Performance Parameter Units Entries Bypasses Total Arrive Flows veh/hr 777 777 Capacity veh/hr 3480 3480 Average Delay sec/veh 5.61 5.61 L.O.S. (Signal)A – F A A L.O.S. (Unsig)A – F A A Total Delay veh.hrs 1.21 1.21 485 SimTraffic Performance Report 2045 No-Build - PM Peak Hour 02/19/2024 2045 No-Build - PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Page 1 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)3.5 1.3 3.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)19.3 22.1 8.8 21.6 15.9 2.6 38.9 18.4 9.8 22.6 18.5 7.1 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8 Total Del/Veh (s)20.3 8: Market Blvd & Market St Performance by movement Movement EBR WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 3.5 1.2 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)6.3 11.6 6.7 2.1 0.5 6.6 1.0 0.6 2.6 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.2 3.8 0.5 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)10.1 5.8 3.6 9.3 7.4 2.1 28.9 22.8 11.7 31.6 26.9 8.6 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)8.9 14: Great Plains Blvd & Market St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)4.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)10.9 3.7 12.5 10.7 4.3 3.1 0.3 0.1 5.1 1.2 1.3 1.8 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)1.3 Total Del/Veh (s)226.7 486 Queuing and Blocking Report 2045 No-Build - PM Peak Hour 02/19/2024 2045 No-Build - PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Page 2 Intersection: 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T R L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft)124 430 165 174 322 19 225 336 116 26 88 Average Queue (ft)28 171 97 90 153 3 182 101 42 7 28 95th Queue (ft)77 321 182 174 286 13 258 319 88 25 66 Link Distance (ft)541 326 326 288 330 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 5 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 1 32 Storage Bay Dist (ft)65 65 75 200 150 65 Storage Blk Time (%)0 29 5 7 19 16 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh)3 97 20 34 34 34 0 0 Intersection: 8: Market Blvd & Market St Movement EB WB NB NB NB SB Directions Served R R L T R L Maximum Queue (ft)77 53 108 117 4 46 Average Queue (ft)27 21 40 12 0 13 95th Queue (ft)50 43 88 96 0 40 Link Distance (ft)184 690 323 Upstream Blk Time (%)1 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 160 95 Storage Blk Time (%)1 Queuing Penalty (veh)2 Intersection: 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB SB SB Directions Served L TR L T TR LTR L TR Maximum Queue (ft)99 199 60 206 56 97 111 135 Average Queue (ft)33 56 5 89 23 43 45 53 95th Queue (ft)70 141 23 162 52 88 88 98 Link Distance (ft)326 1314 1314 87 310 Upstream Blk Time (%)2 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 85 70 Storage Blk Time (%)0 3 6 5 3 Queuing Penalty (veh)1 3 1 7 2 487 Queuing and Blocking Report 2045 No-Build - PM Peak Hour 02/19/2024 2045 No-Build - PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Page 3 Intersection: 14: Great Plains Blvd & Market St Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LT R LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft)39 59 70 47 5 35 7 Average Queue (ft)14 31 32 13 0 7 0 95th Queue (ft)40 52 60 38 4 28 3 Link Distance (ft)315 168 517 517 1314 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)115 95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 271 488 Page 1 of 3Report dated 19-Feb-2024 Rodel Version 1.96 Scheme: 2045 NB Run number 79 Project: Market Blvd2045 PM Peak 85% Confidence Level Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry Operational Data Main Geometry (ft) Approach and Entry Geometry Leg Leg Names Approach Bearing (deg) Grade Separation G Half Width V Approach Lanes n Entry Width E Entry Lanes n Flare Length L' Entry Radius R Entry Angle Phi 1 NB Market Blvd 0 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 2 WB Market Square 90 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 3 SB Market Blvd 180 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 4 EB Market Square 270 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 Circulating and Exit Geometry Leg Leg Names Inscribed Diameter D Circulating Width C Circulating Lanes nc Exit Width Ex Exit Lanes nex Exit Half Width Vx Exit Half Width Lanes nvx 1 NB Market Blvd 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 2 WB Market Square 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 3 SB Market Blvd 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 4 EB Market Square 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 Capacity Modifiers and Capacity Calibration (veh/hr) Leg Leg Names Entry Capacity Capacity + or - XWalk Factor Entry Calibration Intercept + or - Slope Factor Approach Road V (ft) Default Capacity Calib Capacity Exit Road V (ft) Default Capacity Calib Capacity 1 NB Market Blvd 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 2 WB Market Square 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 3 SB Market Blvd 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 4 EB Market Square 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 489 Page 2 of 3Report dated 19-Feb-2024 Rodel Version 1.96 Scheme: 2045 NB Run number 79 Project: Market Blvd2045 PM Peak 85% Confidence Level Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry Operational Results 2045 PM Peak - 60 minutes Flows and Capacity Leg Leg Names Bypass Type Flows (veh/hr) Arrival Flow Entry Bypass Opposing Flow Entry Bypass Exit Flow Capacity (veh/hr) Capacity Entry Bypass Average VCR Entry Bypass 1 NB Market Blvd None 611 118 617 926 0.6596 2 WB Market Square None 106 668 61 631 0.1680 3 SB Market Blvd None 511 184 590 894 0.5719 4 EB Market Square None 241 494 201 728 0.3309 Delays, Queues and Level of Service Leg Leg Names Bypass Type Average Delay (sec) Entry Bypass Leg 95% Queue (veh) Entry Bypass Level of Service Entry Bypass Leg 1 NB Market Blvd None 11.03 11.03 6.06 B B 2 WB Market Square None 6.86 6.86 0.87 A A 3 SB Market Blvd None 9.21 9.21 4.25 A A 4 EB Market Square None 7.35 7.35 1.77 A A 490 Page 3 of 3Report dated 19-Feb-2024 Rodel Version 1.96 Scheme: 2045 NB Run number 79 Project: Market Blvd2045 PM Peak 85% Confidence Level Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry Global Results Performance and Accidents 2045 PM Peak Global Performance Parameter Units Entries Bypasses Total Arrive Flows veh/hr 1469 1469 Capacity veh/hr 3179 3179 Average Delay sec/veh 9.49 9.49 L.O.S. (Signal)A – F A A L.O.S. (Unsig)A – F A A Total Delay veh.hrs 3.87 3.87 491 SimTraffic Performance Report 2045 Build - AM Peak Hour 03/07/2024 2045 Build - AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Page 1 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)3.3 0.9 3.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 4.4 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)9.2 11.3 4.7 11.2 6.2 2.2 21.0 15.5 5.7 21.0 16.2 4.3 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)9.5 8: Market Blvd & Market St Performance by movement Movement EBR WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 3.6 0.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 Total Del/Veh (s)4.8 3.4 3.5 0.4 0.2 3.5 0.9 0.8 1.0 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.3 3.7 0.3 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)10.0 8.1 5.4 9.1 8.2 2.7 21.3 25.7 10.0 23.9 26.3 6.0 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)10.0 14: Great Plains Blvd & Market St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)4.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)8.4 3.5 7.5 3.5 2.4 0.2 0.2 3.8 1.2 1.0 1.8 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)1.2 Total Del/Veh (s)100.8 492 Queuing and Blocking Report 2045 Build - AM Peak Hour 03/07/2024 2045 Build - AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Page 2 Intersection: 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T R L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 66 211 162 150 153 19 156 60 83 29 43 Average Queue (ft)13 82 53 54 54 2 66 15 32 3 14 95th Queue (ft)46 155 108 103 114 12 121 43 64 17 35 Link Distance (ft)541 326 326 302 330 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)65 65 75 200 150 65 Storage Blk Time (%)0 9 2 2 3 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 23 6 6 4 0 Intersection: 8: Market Blvd & Market St Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served R R L L Maximum Queue (ft) 23 55 53 48 Average Queue (ft)3 18 11 8 95th Queue (ft)16 43 38 32 Link Distance (ft)184 690 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB SB SB Directions Served L TR L T TR LTR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 98 218 50 131 80 109 94 131 Average Queue (ft)32 72 17 52 20 62 38 54 95th Queue (ft)74 160 45 107 55 108 75 99 Link Distance (ft)326 1314 1314 87 310 Upstream Blk Time (%)5 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 85 70 Storage Blk Time (%)1 5 2 2 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 5 1 3 2 493 Queuing and Blocking Report 2045 Build - AM Peak Hour 03/07/2024 2045 Build - AM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Page 3 Intersection: 14: Great Plains Blvd & Market St Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LT R LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 60 64 68 26 3 34 Average Queue (ft)24 31 29 4 0 5 95th Queue (ft)52 53 57 20 2 23 Link Distance (ft)315 168 517 517 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)115 95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 54 494 Page 1 of 3Report dated 7-Mar-2024 Rodel Version 1.96 Scheme: 2045 Build - AM Peak Run number 82 Project: Market Blvd2045 AM Peak 85% Confidence Level Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry Operational Data Main Geometry (ft) Approach and Entry Geometry Leg Leg Names Approach Bearing (deg) Grade Separation G Half Width V Approach Lanes n Entry Width E Entry Lanes n Flare Length L' Entry Radius R Entry Angle Phi 1 NB Market Blvd 0 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 2 WB Market Square 90 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 3 SB Market Blvd 180 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 4 EB Market Square 270 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 Circulating and Exit Geometry Leg Leg Names Inscribed Diameter D Circulating Width C Circulating Lanes nc Exit Width Ex Exit Lanes nex Exit Half Width Vx Exit Half Width Lanes nvx 1 NB Market Blvd 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 2 WB Market Square 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 3 SB Market Blvd 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 4 EB Market Square 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 Capacity Modifiers and Capacity Calibration (veh/hr) Leg Leg Names Entry Capacity Capacity + or - XWalk Factor Entry Calibration Intercept + or - Slope Factor Approach Road V (ft) Default Capacity Calib Capacity Exit Road V (ft) Default Capacity Calib Capacity 1 NB Market Blvd 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 2 WB Market Square 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 3 SB Market Blvd 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 4 EB Market Square 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 495 Page 2 of 3Report dated 7-Mar-2024 Rodel Version 1.96 Scheme: 2045 Build - AM Peak Run number 82 Project: Market Blvd2045 AM Peak 85% Confidence Level Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry Operational Results 2045 AM Peak - 60 minutes Flows and Capacity Leg Leg Names Bypass Type Flows (veh/hr) Arrival Flow Entry Bypass Opposing Flow Entry Bypass Exit Flow Capacity (veh/hr) Capacity Entry Bypass Average VCR Entry Bypass 1 NB Market Blvd None 332 50 420 947 0.3507 2 WB Market Square None 71 360 22 764 0.0930 3 SB Market Blvd None 405 93 338 941 0.4305 4 EB Market Square None 56 414 84 772 0.0726 Delays, Queues and Level of Service Leg Leg Names Bypass Type Average Delay (sec) Entry Bypass Leg 95% Queue (veh) Entry Bypass Level of Service Entry Bypass Leg 1 NB Market Blvd None 5.65 5.65 1.73 A A 2 WB Market Square None 5.01 5.01 0.31 A A 3 SB Market Blvd None 6.57 6.57 2.34 A A 4 EB Market Square None 4.98 4.98 0.23 A A 496 Page 3 of 3Report dated 7-Mar-2024 Rodel Version 1.96 Scheme: 2045 Build - AM Peak Run number 82 Project: Market Blvd2045 AM Peak 85% Confidence Level Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry Global Results Performance and Accidents 2045 AM Peak Global Performance Parameter Units Entries Bypasses Total Arrive Flows veh/hr 864 864 Capacity veh/hr 3423 3423 Average Delay sec/veh 5.99 5.99 L.O.S. (Signal)A – F A A L.O.S. (Unsig)A – F A A Total Delay veh.hrs 1.44 1.44 497 SimTraffic Performance Report 2045 Build - PM Peak Hour 03/07/2024 2045 Build - PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Page 1 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)3.2 1.3 3.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)20.0 25.3 10.1 25.7 15.7 3.1 39.8 20.5 10.9 23.4 18.0 9.0 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8 Total Del/Veh (s)21.6 8: Market Blvd & Market St Performance by movement Movement EBR WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.1 3.5 1.3 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)6.8 16.8 7.1 3.0 0.9 6.4 1.0 0.9 3.2 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 1.1 1.2 0.7 3.8 0.4 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)12.7 10.0 7.2 14.2 9.1 2.4 25.8 27.7 15.0 25.8 21.1 8.2 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)11.1 14: Great Plains Blvd & Market St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s)4.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)13.8 4.1 12.1 10.8 4.8 3.4 0.3 0.2 5.4 1.6 1.5 1.9 Total Zone Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)1.3 Total Del/Veh (s)258.0 498 Queuing and Blocking Report 2045 Build - PM Peak Hour 03/07/2024 2045 Build - PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Page 2 Intersection: 6: Market Blvd & W 78th St Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T R L T R L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 164 451 165 175 328 28 225 339 121 38 96 Average Queue (ft)32 199 113 97 151 3 180 118 47 9 29 95th Queue (ft)99 362 204 175 273 17 256 348 94 29 67 Link Distance (ft)541 326 326 288 330 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 6 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 2 37 Storage Bay Dist (ft)65 65 75 200 150 65 Storage Blk Time (%)0 35 5 13 20 15 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 118 20 62 41 39 0 0 0 Intersection: 8: Market Blvd & Market St Movement EB WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served R R L T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 64 59 104 127 52 60 13 Average Queue (ft)27 25 40 22 4 17 0 95th Queue (ft)53 51 93 134 49 48 6 Link Distance (ft)184 690 323 Upstream Blk Time (%)1 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)160 160 95 120 Storage Blk Time (%)0 2 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 4 0 0 Intersection: 11: Laredo Blvd & W 78th St Movement EB EB WB WB WB NB SB SB Directions Served L TR L T TR LTR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 156 291 156 219 103 115 106 121 Average Queue (ft)41 98 37 95 28 72 41 52 95th Queue (ft)109 230 90 178 69 116 83 93 Link Distance (ft)326 1314 1314 87 310 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 8 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 85 70 Storage Blk Time (%)0 8 0 8 3 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 8 0 5 4 2 499 Queuing and Blocking Report 2045 Build - PM Peak Hour 03/07/2024 2045 Build - PM Peak Hour SimTraffic Report Page 3 Intersection: 14: Great Plains Blvd & Market St Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LT R LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 43 65 77 48 3 40 2 Average Queue (ft)13 32 35 14 0 7 0 95th Queue (ft)39 54 63 40 2 28 2 Link Distance (ft)315 168 517 517 1314 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)115 95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 347 500 Page 1 of 3Report dated 7-Mar-2024 Rodel Version 1.96 Scheme: 2045 Build - AM Peak Run number 89 Project: Market Blvd2045 PM Peak 85% Confidence Level Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry Operational Data Main Geometry (ft) Approach and Entry Geometry Leg Leg Names Approach Bearing (deg) Grade Separation G Half Width V Approach Lanes n Entry Width E Entry Lanes n Flare Length L' Entry Radius R Entry Angle Phi 1 NB Market Blvd 0 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 2 WB Market Square 90 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 3 SB Market Blvd 180 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 4 EB Market Square 270 0 12.00 1 14.00 1 150.00 66.00 30.00 Circulating and Exit Geometry Leg Leg Names Inscribed Diameter D Circulating Width C Circulating Lanes nc Exit Width Ex Exit Lanes nex Exit Half Width Vx Exit Half Width Lanes nvx 1 NB Market Blvd 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 2 WB Market Square 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 3 SB Market Blvd 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 4 EB Market Square 110.00 15.00 1 14.00 1 12.00 1 Capacity Modifiers and Capacity Calibration (veh/hr) Leg Leg Names Entry Capacity Capacity + or - XWalk Factor Entry Calibration Intercept + or - Slope Factor Approach Road V (ft) Default Capacity Calib Capacity Exit Road V (ft) Default Capacity Calib Capacity 1 NB Market Blvd 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 2 WB Market Square 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 3 SB Market Blvd 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 4 EB Market Square 0 1.000 0 1.000 20.00 1792 0 12.00 1792 0 501 Page 2 of 3Report dated 7-Mar-2024 Rodel Version 1.96 Scheme: 2045 Build - AM Peak Run number 89 Project: Market Blvd2045 PM Peak 85% Confidence Level Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry Operational Results 2045 PM Peak - 60 minutes Flows and Capacity Leg Leg Names Bypass Type Flows (veh/hr) Arrival Flow Entry Bypass Opposing Flow Entry Bypass Exit Flow Capacity (veh/hr) Capacity Entry Bypass Average VCR Entry Bypass 1 NB Market Blvd None 653 118 653 926 0.7049 2 WB Market Square None 113 710 61 608 0.1860 3 SB Market Blvd None 540 191 632 890 0.6070 4 EB Market Square None 241 530 201 708 0.3402 Delays, Queues and Level of Service Leg Leg Names Bypass Type Average Delay (sec) Entry Bypass Leg 95% Queue (veh) Entry Bypass Level of Service Entry Bypass Leg 1 NB Market Blvd None 12.67 12.67 7.58 B B 2 WB Market Square None 7.31 7.31 1.00 A A 3 SB Market Blvd None 10.07 10.07 4.99 B B 4 EB Market Square None 7.67 7.67 1.87 A A 502 Page 3 of 3Report dated 7-Mar-2024 Rodel Version 1.96 Scheme: 2045 Build - AM Peak Run number 89 Project: Market Blvd2045 PM Peak 85% Confidence Level Daylight conditions Rodel-Win1 - Full Geometry Global Results Performance and Accidents 2045 PM Peak Global Performance Parameter Units Entries Bypasses Total Arrive Flows veh/hr 1547 1547 Capacity veh/hr 3132 3132 Average Delay sec/veh 10.59 10.59 L.O.S. (Signal)A – F B B L.O.S. (Unsig)A – F B B Total Delay veh.hrs 4.55 4.55 503 800 Washington Avenue North, Suite 103 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Memorandum To : Eric Maass, Planning Director, City of Chanhassen From: Kevin Clarke, HKGi Subject: Parking Analysis for Proposed Market Boulevard & West 78th Street Mixed Use Project Date: February 13, 2024 Project Introduction Parking in Chanhassen’s Downtown Area between W 78th Street, Market Boulevard, Great Plains Boulevard, and the railroad tracks is provided through both private/restricted parking and through shared parking agreements. Shared parking in this district is beneficial to reduce the amount of parking needed by allowing spaces to be used by multiple users at different times. For example, the parking demanded for hotel and grocery do not often overlap so the same space can serve multiple vehicles over the course of a day rather than requiring both users to build separate stalls. This contributes to a denser, more walkable environment that is desired within the downtown area. There are limits to this, as demand for some spaces overlaps and cannot be “doubled up” and some additional supply needs to be built in with the intent of ensuring available parking. Because there are potential benefits and opportunities for shared parking, the City can utilize a parking study to review the impacts of a proposed development, rather than relying solely on code ratios. This study is intended to examine the parking impacts of the proposed development project at Market Blvd and 78th St. within the context of the larger Downtown Chanhassen area. This study utilizes similar methodology as used to evaluate parking demand in the area in 2013 and when evaluating the Venue/Aldi project. This approach takes into account changes in parking demand over the course of a day, and expected parking demand from different land uses. This study reviews findings from the City’s zoning code, the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE), and the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and applies a hybrid approach using all three when appropriate to anticipating demand. Findings More detailed findings can be found below and in the parking generation tool spreadsheets, but at a high level, the proposed project will more fully utilize parking compared with what is observed today. This is in part because the Cinema is not generating demand currently, the transit ramp is not being used for park-and-riders, and peak hotel use is more occasional than a restaurant or housing. If the current spaces were occupied and being used as modeled, the district would be seeing about 88% parking utilization at peak conditions. If the project as proposed is built, the district would be seeing about 92% parking utilization at peak conditions. Using the same methodologies as previous parking studies for the district, parking across the study area will increase in peak demand conditions from 73% modeled utilization (with the theater closed) to 77%, or a net increase in about 54 spaces demanded as compared to supply. 504 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 2 This project will also create more impact on the west side of the study area. When looking at the parking availability north and south of the proposed project (eliminating the SWTransit Parking Ramp and the large lot east of the Chanhassen Dinner Theater), the peak utilization numbers reach 92% utilization for the retail uses and parking spaces anticipated for residential users would be nearly fully utilized. This study finds that the proposed parking is adequate to meet the demands of the proposed development. In total, the area will see an increase utilization of parking from 88% based on existing land uses to 92% at peak demand. This increased demand can be further mitigated through shared parking facilitated through shared residential parking on the south side of The Venue . Additional strategies, if necessary in the longer term, are available and discussed at the end of this study. A note on ratios and utilization The ratios that are used in this study are intended to represent the highest reasonable parking demand created by a land use. For example, when considering numbers for a restaurant, the intent is for the ratios to represent a Friday or Saturday at a popular restaurant. A less frequented restaurant on a Tuesday will not have nearly the same parking counts, but the study is intentionally using the highest reasonable numbers. It is common for parking counts and parking demand to lag behind both zoning and the model. In the study area, the model would anticipate The Venue generating demand to park 215 vehicles. Informal observations would suggest the actual number is closer to 160-180. The model also includes shared parking considerations. Demand is modeled hourly and the max demand over the course of a day is the reported “Peak” demand. That means even if two uses both generate 100 spaces of demand, the total peak demand may still be less than 200 stalls if the demand does not fully overlap (ie. hotel demand is heaviest overnight, while office demand is heavier during the day). The model does not include conclusions for “one-off” events that may exceed the numbers shown. Consider the Fourth of July when the City is hosting festivities at City Hall and City Center Park, or a hypothetical where the businesses throw big a block party, it is more likely that parking would be in short supply. Proposed Development Roers Companies is proposing the development of two mixed use buildings. These buildings will replace the existing Country Inn and Suites, High Timber Lounge, and Chanhassen Cinema. The west building will include 184 units of housing and 11,853 SF of retail uses spread across four spaces. The east building will include 3,029 SF of retail over two spaces and 126 units of housing. Both also include structured parking and amenity space. A more detailed review of the proposed uses is below: 505 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 3 West Building East Building Residential (Units) 184 Residential (Units) 126 Studio/Alcove/1 Bedroom 93 Studio/Alcove/1 Bedroom 72 2 Bedroom/3Bedroom 91 2 Bedroom/3Bedroom 54 Retail Uses (SF) 11,853 Retail Uses (SF) 3,029 General Retail 7,400 General Retail 3,029 Restaurant 4,453 Parking Generation Residential – East Building The east building will contain 72 units with 1 or fewer bedrooms. The City’s zoning code would require 1.5 spaces for every unit, anticipating that some units would have 2 people living in them, each with their own car. Furthermore there should be enough parking for guests. For the purposes of this analysis, 1.38 spaces per unit is a more appropriate ratio. This is the ratio utilized by ITE for all apartments (including multi-bedroom units). It is further reinforced by observed parking demand generated by The Venue project immediately to the east. The east building will also contain 54 units with 2 or 3 bedrooms. Zoning would require 2 spaces for each unit. This analysis finds that 1.85 spaces per unit is more appropriate. This is consistent with ULI’s findings. Based on observations of The Venue and anecdotal trends that suggest more people are using second bedrooms as guest bedrooms (only occasional parking need) or home offices, the 1.85 spaces per unit ratio is potentially higher than true demand. Residential – West Building The west building will contain 93 units with 1 or fewer bedrooms. An additional 91 apartments will be 2-3 bedroom units. The same ratios are used for the east and west buildings. Residential Parking Impacts Units Ratio Spaces 0-1 BR 165 1.38 227.7 2+ BR 145 1.85 268.3 TOTAL 310 496.0 As illustrated above, the residential land uses associated with the two buildings are expected to generate demand for 496 spaces. The City’s zoning code and this project expect at least 1 dedicated, structured parking stall per unit. The current design as submitted includes 342 parking stalls dedicated for residents with controlled access, which is more than the 310 units being built. These stalls will not be available to other users, and cannot be included in shared parking agreements, or generate shared parking efficiencies. 506 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 4 With 496 spaces demanded and 342 dedicated, structured spaces supplied, there is anticipated demand for an additional 154 stalls. The 154 additional stalls necessary at peak are provided through the surface parking lots. Residential parking demand peaks overnight, but even during the day it remains well used, only dipping to 65% of total demand at mid-day. Demand in late afternoons/evenings is between 90-100%. Dedicated, structured parking stalls are counted as 100% occupied, even though they may not have a car in them, because they are not available to other parking users. General Retail – East Building The east building is designed with two retail bays, totaling 3,029 SF of space. The City’s zoning code uses 1 parking stall for every 250 SF of retail space. ITE and ULI, with observed counts, use similar demand numbers at 1 per 244 SF (ITE) and 1 per 250 SF (ULI). For this analysis, 1 stall per 250 SF is used. General Retail – West Building The west building has 3 bays slotted for retail, adding up to 7,400 SF. As discussed above, these spaces are counted as generating demand at 1 stall per 250 SF. Restaurant – West Building The west building also incorporates 4,453 SF of restaurant space. The City’s zoning code utilizes a ratio of 1 space for every 60 square feet of restaurant space. If the restaurant has a full liquor license, the ratio is one space per 50 SF. This study utilizes a ratio of about 1 stall per 55 square feet. This is consistent with the ULI ratio. For comparison, ITE, which is based solely off of observed conditions, found the highest typical peak demand closer to 1 vehicle per 75 SF at suburban restaurants. Commercial Parking Impacts SF Ratio Spaces East Building Retail 3,029 0.004 12.1 West Building Retail 7,400 0.004 29.6 West Building Restaurant 4,453 0.018 80.1 TOTAL 121.9 As illustrated above, the retail/restaurant land uses associated with the two buildings are expected to generate demand for 121 spaces. These uses peak in the late afternoon/evening, but carry some parking demand through the day. This can be highly dependent on a business’ hours of operation. For example a bank will not typically have much demand after 5:00 PM, while a dinner only restaurant may only require a few spaces until then. Overnight demand is expected to be minimal. Land Uses/Parking Generators Removed As part of the development, the hotel, High Timber Lounge, associated meeting rooms, and the Chanhassen Cinema will be removed. This also frees up a number of spaces when calculating available parking. Chanhassen Cinema is closed, so it is not currently generating parking demand, but 507 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 5 previous calculations for other development projects have included the demand when calculating parking availability. Rooms/SF/Seats Spaces Hotel 122 Rooms -152.5 High Timber Lounge 950 SF -15.7 Meeting/Conference 1,849 SF -212.3 Cinema 1,115 seats -301.1 TOTAL -526.5 It is worth noting that these numbers do represent peak demand, not typical demand. Furthermore, the cinema has been able to utilize the SWTransit parking ramp if necessary, as the cinema peak was typically in the evening, while transit ridership was typically during the day. Change in Net Parking Demand Spaces New Residential Demand 496.0 New Retail/Restaurant Demand 121.9 Removed Demand -526.5 TOTAL 91.4 The proposed development will generate demand for an additional 91.4 spaces than what exists today. As discussed below, the proposed development results in a net parking change of 323 more parking spaces that what currently exists. Parking Supply Existing Parking Supply 508 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 6 There are currently 933 surface parking spaces in the study area. These spaces are regulated by a series of cross access parking agreements, but are in general available to serve demand. In addition to those surface spaces, SWTransit owns a parking ramp with 424 spaces. These are reserved from 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM, and residents are not permitted to park overnight. SWTransit is not currently running routes through this location. The Venue also has 134 structured parking spaces that are reserved for residents. Observations of the site suggest that parking is not a problem in the study area and spaces are readily available. Parking removed as part of the development As part of the proposed development, the surface parking nearest the hotel will be removed. This represents 143 spaces. Parking added as part of the development The two buildings will build a mixture of surface and structured parking. Proposed plans show 49 surface spaces north of the east building and 9 surface spaces at the south end of the east building. The west building is dedicating a portion of the parking structure to serve retail and the restaurants. This will have 64 spaces that are publicly available. In addition to the public parking, the west building parking structure has 274 dedicated residential spaces. The east building has 68 structured, reserved spaces for residents. Changes in Parking Supply Existing Public Structured and Surface Parking 1357 Existing Surface Parking 933 Existing SWTransit Ramp 424 Removed Surface Parking -143 New Commercial Surface and Structured Parking +124 Net Parking Change - Commercial Parking -19 Total non-Reserved Structured and Surface Parking 1338 Existing Reserved Residential 134 New Reserved Residential Parking 342 Net Parking Change - Reserved Residential Parking +342 Net Parking Change +323 Overall, the project adds 323 spaces worth of parking. 509 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 7 Demand Modeling with Shared Parking One of the benefits of a mixed use district is the ability to use a shared parking approach. Most of the study area already has cross access and shared use agreements. This improves the efficiency with which each space is used. It also helps contribute to a more vibrant, walkable district, by reducing the amount of space dedicated to parking, and putting that back into a productive use. For the purposes of this study, multiple scenarios were run. Demand and supply of reserved residential models were assumed at 100% and are not illustrated in the following charts. The charts have weekday (left) and weekend (right) utilization shown. District Model – SW Transit Ramp is approximately 50% available for use during the day District Model – SW Transit Ramp is not available for use from 2:00AM to 6:00PM on weekdays - 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1,000.00 1,200.00 1,400.00 7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AM7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AMSenior MFR 2 BR MFR Studio 1BR Parking Garage SF Studio or Classroom SF Restaurant Nightclub SF Restaurant Fast Food SF Restaurant Sit Down SF Dinner Theater SF Cinema SF Convention Hotel Rooms SF Office SF Service Commercial SF Retail General Merchandise - 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1,000.00 1,200.00 1,400.00 7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AM7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AMSenior MFR 2 BR MFR Studio 1BR Parking Garage SF Studio or Classroom SF Restaurant Nightclub SF Restaurant Fast Food SF Restaurant Sit Down SF Dinner Theater SF Cinema SF Convention Hotel Rooms SF Office SF Service Commercial SF Retail General Merchandise 510 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 8 Areas of Concern & Strategies Retail/Restaurant and 78th Street Side (Up the Hill) While there is parking available throughout the district, it is likely that most of the retail and restaurant demand will need to be filled by the “up the hill” parking. It will be important that the parking provided does not impact other properties across Market Boulevard or 78th Street (without a shared parking agreement. Excluding residential uses, analysis of the “up the hill” locations (new retail, new restaurant, ALDI) shows 193 spaces of demand, with 211 spaces available at peak conditions. On these occasions, that is about a 91% utilization rate which will feel very full, but there are spaces anticipated to be available. This relies on sorting residential parking out of this location. While adequate parking is supplied, it would be preferrable to open additional capacity in this location. Continue to monitor demand and if parking is getting tight, consider the strategies below: • Enhanced signage to make sure general parking users know they are permitted in the top level of the parking garage. • A more careful determination of retailers to reduce overlapping demand. For example, a coffee shop has higher morning demand, but less overlap with evening demand for the restaurant. • Shared parking agreements with properties across 78th. • Adjusting the split of public/private parking on the top deck of the parking structure. Given the tightness of parking because of the proposed restaurant, there may be an opportunity to shift some of the reserved parking on the top level of the ramp into a general use. 32 stalls could be shifted and still maintain a 1 structured stall per unit for the residential uses. • Encourage residential parking to remain “down the hill” particularly during the afternoon/early evenings to keep spaces available for retail/restaurant users. • Consider shifting the dog area in the upper parking lot to the south side of the east building to build additional parking spaces on the north side of the east building where commercial parking demand is greatest. - 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 Senior MFR 2 BR MFR Studio 1BR Parking Garage SF Studio or Classroom SF Restaurant Nightclub SF Restaurant Fast Food SF Restaurant Sit Down SF Dinner Theater SF Cinema SF Convention Hotel Rooms SF Office SF Service Commercial SF Retail General Merchandise 511 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 9 Residential and Market Street Side (Down the Hill) Even though many of the residential parking users have structured parking available, demand will exceed what is being built in the structures by about 154 spaces. Currently, the surface lots south of the Chanhassen Cinema and The Venue are very empty. Recent counts at different times of the day and evening have seen between 10 and 25 cars on 190 stalls (surplus of 165-180). This suggests that typical demand for the 134 units at The Venue is closer to 1.2 stalls per unit overall than the average of 1.6 that the model uses or the 2 stalls per unit that was the zoning at the time the project was built. It is possible that some of this demand is currently being filled in the “up the hill” locations. Looking at the “down the hill” parking counts, and excluding the parking structure, the model sees only 3 spaces available with tightening occurring during the day when including the Krause Anderson project south of the west building, but with significant supply remaining overnight. When eliminating the Krause Anderson project and only looking at the lots immediately south of the east building and south of The Venue, the tight spot is overnight. Including parking in the Kraus Anderson project (approaching capacity mid-day) Just the two lots south of The Venue and the east building (exceeds modeled peak capacity overnight) - 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 350.00 400.00 450.00 7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AM7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AMSenior MFR 2 BR MFR Studio 1BR Parking Garage SF Studio or Classroom SF Restaurant Nightclub SF Restaurant Fast Food SF Restaurant Sit Down SF Dinner Theater SF Cinema SF Convention Hotel Rooms SF Office SF Service Commercial SF Retail General Merchandise - 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AM7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AMSenior MFR 2 BR MFR Studio 1BR Parking Garage SF Studio or Classroom SF Restaurant Nightclub SF Restaurant Fast Food SF Restaurant Sit Down SF Dinner Theater SF Cinema SF Convention Hotel Rooms SF Office SF Service Commercial SF Retail General Merchandise 512 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 10 Based on observed counts, it would appear that there is more capacity than the model is showing as it is designed to consider the peak conditions and is erring on the side of caution. Continue to monitor parking demand in this location. If additional strategies are required, consider: • Overnight parking further into the Krause Anderson project with limitations on daytime parking. • Improved walkability and coordination between the dinner theater and overnight parking users. • Coordination with SWTransit on use of the ramp (see below) Status of the SWTransit Ramp Currently SWTransit is not running busses through this station. This has been the case since COVID 19 impacted ridership numbers. Even before 2020, ramp utilization by transit users had never been strong enough to fill anywhere close to the 424 spaces. Long term plans for SWTransit and routing have not been identified as part of this study. As a strategy, there should be discussions with SWTransit to remove or reduce restrictions on the parking ramp. 513 APRIL 5, 2023 - CHAN-HAPPENINGS 1,568 RECIPIENTS 1 514 JULY 28, 2023 - MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR 10,316 RECIPIENTS 2 515 AUGUST 8, 2023 - PROJECT WEBSITE ESTABLISHED 3,553 VISITORS HAVE VIEWED THIS WEBPAGE (DATA PULLED MARCH 6, 2024) 3 516 DECEMBER 22, 2023 - MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR 12,025 RECIPIENTS 4 517 JANUARY 2, 2024 - PROJECT UPDATE 3,007 RECIPIENTS 5 518 JANUARY 7, 2024 - NEWSPAPER AD 6 519 JANUARY 10, 2024 - CHAN-HAPPENINGS 5,029 RECIPIENTS 7 520 JANUARY 17, 2024 - CHAN-HAPPENINGS 5,029 RECIPIENTS 8 521 JANUARY 17, 2024 - SOCIAL MEDIA 3,734 RECIPIENTS 9 522 JANUARY 19, 2024 - MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR 12,254 RECIPIENTS 10 523 JANUARY 25, 2024 - NEWS ARTICLE 11 524 JANUARY 29, 2024 - PROJECT UPDATE 2,221 RECIPIENTS 12 525 FEBRUARY 7, 2024 - CHAN-HAPPENINGS 5,086 RECIPIENTS 13 526 FEBRUARY 8, 2024 - POSTCARD NOTIFICATION MAILED TO 89 PROPERTY OWNERS LOCATED NEAR THE REDEVELOPMENT 14 527 FEBRUARY 12, 2024 - PROJECT UPDATE 2,241 RECIPIENTS 15 528 FEBRUARY 14, 2024 - CHAN-HAPPENINGS 5,086 RECIPIENTS 16 529 FEBRUARY 16, 2024 - PROJECT UPDATE 2,252 RECIPIENTS 17 530 FEBRUARY 16, 2024 - MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR 12,233 RECIPIENTS 18 531 FEBRUARY 16, 2024 - SOCIAL MEDIA 1,571 RECIPIENTS 19 532 FEBRUARY 20, 2024 - PROJECT UPDATE 2,257 RECIPIENTS 20 533 FEBRUARY 20, 2024 - MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR 12,233 RECIPIENTS 21 534 MARCH 1, 2024 - MESSAGE FROM THE MAYOR 12,221 RECIPIENTS 22 535 MARCH 5, 2024 - PROJECT UPDATE 2,312 RECIPIENTS 23 536 MARCH 5 2024 - CHAN-HAPPENINGS 2,312 RECIPIENTS 24 537 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 20, 2024 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Noyes called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Eric Noyes, Erik Johnson, Kelsey Alto, Perry Schwartz, Ryan Soller, Edward Goff, Steve Jobe. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Eric Maass, Planning Director; Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer, Rachel Arsenault, Associate Planner, Rachel Jeske, Planner, Samantha DiMaggio, Economic Development Manager. PUBLIC PRESENT: Nick Asta, Roers Companies 2 Carlson Parkway, Plymouth Bob Loken, ESG Architects 500 Washington Ave S, Minneapolis Marty Schutrop 540 Lakota Lane Paul Theis 6020 White Dove Circle Thomas Wilmer 517 Del Rio Drive Mark Frisbie 7460 Longview Circle Andrew Klinkner 7606 Kiowa Avenue Debbie Lloyd 7302 Laredo Drive Mark Engebretson 7605 Iroquois Street Ann Jeske 506 West 76th Street Judy Harder 541 W 78th Street Connie Hatton 8018 Eric Avenue Leah Olson 2034 Stone Creek Drive Liz Williams 7611 Kiowa Avenue Jim Gunville 7608 Kiowa Avenue Joan (Joanie) Demeter 8203 Marsh Drive Janet Paulson 7305 Laredo Drive Charlie Littfin 7609 Laredo Drive Linda Paulson 7603 Frontier Trail PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND VARIANCE REQUEST FOR MARKET STREET ADDITION; REDEVELOPMENT OF THE CHANHASSEN CINEMA AND HOTEL (PLANNING CASE 24-01) 538 Planning Commission Minutes – February 20, 2024 2 Eric Maass, Planning Director, gave a summary of the staff report, noting the applicant is requesting preliminary plat, site plan, and a variance to the build to zone for the construction of two mixed use buildings totaling 310 market-rate apartment units and approximately 14,882 square feet of leasable commercial space. Mr. Maass explained that Roers Companies has applied to redevelop approximately four acres of property near the intersection of West 78th Street and Market Boulevard. The four acres proposed consist of the Country Inn & Suites and the now-closed Chanhassen Cinema. The plans submitted for the redevelopment include two buildings, which would include about 14,000 square feet of first-floor commercial space to be used for restaurants, retail, or additional commercial services. Mr. Maass noted the upper stories would consist of approximately 310 market-rate apartments and amenity decks. The buildings themselves have a variety of building heights, including areas that are one, two, five, and six stories in height. The project would include approximately 408 structured underground parking stalls as well as surface parking to support residential and commercial uses. He shared architectural and landscape plans, and site renderings. Mr. Maass noted that in addition to the subdivision, site plan, and variance requests, the applicant has submitted a request to the city for Tax Increment Financing (TIF). Part of the review process for that request is the City's Planning Commission reviewing the TIF Plan for conformance to the City's Comprehensive Plan as it relates to land use. The TIF plan outlines the proposed redevelopment of the site into a vertical mixed-use development consisting of both commercial space as well as residential uses which does align with the City's Comprehensive Plan guidance for the parcels in question. Mr. Maass stated that staff recommends adopting the resolution finding the Tax Increment Financing plan for District 13 is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Schwartz asked how the architectural color palette compares to the Civic Campus. Mr. Maass believes the two are complementary and shared about the earth-tones and black accents with a modern and timeless type of architectural presence. Commissioner Schwartz recalls that the Laredo Drive extension would dogleg on to Market Street. Mr. Maass clarified that at some point it will continue south, but only at the time the property owner decides to do something with the property. Commissioner Schwartz asked about the benefits of a green roof. Mr. Maass replied a green roof helps meet planting requirements and storm water requirements, as well as cooling of the building. Commissioner Goff asked if the architecture clashes with the apartments above Aldi. 539 Planning Commission Minutes – February 20, 2024 3 Mr. Maass does not think they clash and noted that building is not seen as the architectural model to be emulated throughout the community. He thinks it works with the building but does not use it as a model from which to create a twin. Commissioner Goff asked regarding the easement, with the Chanhassen Business District (CBD) and wanting to have things up against the street, what are the options? Mr. Maass replied at this point the city has exhausted all options and are trying to work with Aldi for a vacation of a portion of that drive access easement. At this point Aldi is unwilling to do so as it is a private easement. He noted Aldi finds value for their shoppers to be able to utilize both intersections. Chair Noyes asked how the mural sizing compares to the existing mural? Mr. Maass does not know the answer at this point, but noted on the elevation it is a 26-foot wall and that the proposed mural location depicted takes up nearly the entire height of that wall. Commissioner Soller clarified the two primary decisions are 1) granting the single variance on the west side of the building along Market Boulevard and 2) making sure TIF District 13 is consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. He asked how the TIF District is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Maass explained the TIF plan outlined the proposed redevelopment into a vertical mixed-use building with market-rate apartments above and commercial below. The City’s Comprehensive Plan for the Central Business District is for increased residential density and increased commercial opportunities. For those reasons, staff is supportive. Nick Asta of Roers Companies shared about his firm noting they have worked with staff for many months and are very excited about the project. He emphasized their priority in public art, walking trails, trees and greenspace which are all front of mind in this project. Chair Noyes asked about the timeline to completion. Mr. Asta noted they would start construction at the beginning of Quarter 3 in July/August and is about a 20-month construction period for each building, which would occur in tandem. He noted it would be about 24 months start-to-finish. Commissioner Schwartz asked about plans for sustainable construction, solar energy, and electric vehicle chargers. Bob Loken, ESG Architects, shared that apartment buildings are inherently more energy- efficient than standalone homes. He noted their commitment to performing a complete energy model on these buildings and will look at all assemblies and mechanical systems together to show where to put increased insulation. He spoke about window-to-wall ratio, 10% of all 540 Planning Commission Minutes – February 20, 2024 4 enclosed parking stalls having an Electric Vehicle (EV) charger with future capacity of up to 20%, and the green roof compliance with the watershed’s storm water requirements. Commissioner Schwartz asked about solar panels on the roof of the building. Mr. Loken noted solar panels can be difficult on buildings like these due to the roof needing venting for plumbing vents and there is less available space for the efficient use of solar panels. He noted many times they will make buildings “solar ready” with conduit to the roof and pull cables for the future and making sure roof trusses are designed to accommodate that future load. He noted that typically the roof space available on an apartment building can supply 2-4% of the electrical load of the building. He also shared that the mural size on the east side is the exact same size as the existing mural and the west side is a bit larger. Commissioner Jobe asked if the city would have first right to purchase the building should it become an asset on the open market, because it is an intricate part of downtown Chanhassen. Mr. Maass noted the city would not have first right-of-refusal, but the portion of the outlot on the Laredo Drive extension would be deeded to the city. Chair Noyes opened the public hearing. Marty Schutrop, 540 Lakota Lane, has lived in Chanhassen for 30 years and in looking at the plan he asked, where is the small town feel? He noted opening a Pandora’s Box like this will lead to every small retail shop becoming an apartment building and it will look like Uptown. He stated it is ridiculous that the city would allow that on a small town main street. There is no reason they could not put this outside of the city off the main street. He has developed small properties and noted it seems like more work to split off one lot than it would to get this project approved. Mr. Schutrop said Chanhassen is billed as a small town and this is not a small town project and will bring people in that are not family-oriented but transient with year-to-year leases and no investment into the community. He asked the Commissioners to reconsider allowing this project. Joanie Demeter, 8203 Marsh Drive, thinks the portion of the presentation regarding roads and engineering was glossed over. As a 35-year resident there are many places within the city with much congestion and she thinks the engineering department could do a much better job of helping residents navigate through the city. In her opinion, more detail needs to be added. Ms. Demeter asked what percent of the 310 dwellings will help people who cannot afford the market- rate? Chair Noyes stated these are market-rate apartments and are not designed for a low-income population. Ms. Demeter asked if there is an expectation that the city helps people who cannot afford to live in these dwellings? 541 Planning Commission Minutes – February 20, 2024 5 Chair Noyes replied there is an expectation on a citywide basis, but it is not tied into this particular project. There are other lower-rent options for people within the city. Ms. Demeter asked about the engineering of the roads to accommodate the influx of residents? Mr. Maass explained the purpose of a public hearing is not to have a back-and-forth but rather a forum for continuous public comment. Following the public hearing, the Commissioners may follow-up with questions for staff. Paul Theis, 6020 White Dove Circle, noted he had trouble hearing and did not hear what the variance request would be. He spoke about a questionnaire that went out regarding the new City Hall campus noting the highest vote at 45% was that the residents did not want a “closed-in” feel to the city with high-rises. He noted regarding the TIF, if the apartments will be market-rate the developer can pay for that and they do not have to take away taxes from the city. Mr. Theis does not think they need to rush into this project and he spoke about storm water, the area being in a low spot, and potential flooding. He posed the question about whether this is the type of community they want. Liz Williams, 7611 Kiowa Avenue, does environmental health and safety, noting she has two students in the district, aged 10 and 12, and lives one block from Chanhassen Elementary. She noted she ducks cars back-and-forth and advocated not only looking at the main campus, but with future development, and redevelopment to bring people into the park, the infrastructure, traffic, and activities. She noted the reason she moved here 11 years ago is because of the cute little downtown. Ms. Williams noted she does not like the concrete, noting the high-rise increases the noise, and while she could hear crickets at night, since Venue went up that noise has been bouncing off the highway and it is harder to hear that nature. With two high-rise buildings, it will make the noise bounce back-and-forth, and with fans evacuating the underground parking that will also be noisy. Ms. Williams noted continuing to add impervious surfaces will increase the heat island and bring more storms to the area. She spoke about the recharge from the aquifer and runoff, and spoke about a Roers Companies project in Milwaukee where trichloroethylene (TCE), a dry-cleaner solvent, was found and the property was contaminated. She noted it was settled for $25,000 per resident, but people in the building had those vapors coming up through the building. That liability and the people living there is open for cancer and Ms. Williams’ concern with the company is the liability and financial ability to continue maintaining this building at this height. Ms. Williams spoke about the use of fiberboard cement, which is about 50% silica, and when the material is cut the silica goes airborne. She noted there are people that will be living there that will be exposed to that. Regarding parking, Ms. Williams loves the idea of people biking and ride-sharing, but given how far out Chanhassen is, people will still need transportation. Ms. Williams spoke about the soil and if it is contaminated and not fully remediated, it will get into the storm water and go back up through the vapor system. Ms. Williams likes the boulevard and the fact that they have grass and trees on each side, she loves the 4th of July parade, and if this project has to go through, she asked to keep it at a maximum of three stories. Thomas Wilmer, 517 Del Rio Drive, finds it odd that the timing of the moratorium and preliminary redevelopment plan is the same day. He noted he also thinks the project is a couple 542 Planning Commission Minutes – February 20, 2024 6 of floors too large and without any options of ownership so people can be personally involved in the community. He spoke about a Zuppa Cucina that was killed off by not “fitting the vision of Chanhassen” and he asked how that can happen alongside Chick-Fil-A doubling its drive- through capacity in a few weeks. He does not believe these items are coincidences. Mr. Wilmer noted the impact on roadways with additional 400-500 parking spots in the area, noting coming and going will be difficult and asked if it can handle that kind of traffic flow and congestion. Regarding septic and water with all of the additional bathrooms and sinks and asked how that will be handled and whether existing facilities can process that flow and waste. Mr. Williams asked where additional space will come for West 78th Street to make it broader, wider, and maintain the green space. He shared about a 20% maximum of EV charging stations noting they are altering the vehicle capability of the facility. He asked if there has been a tax revenue estimate with 80% occupancy. Linda Paulson, 7603 Frontier Trail, used to live in Wisconsin and moved to Chanhassen for a number of good reasons. She spoke about safety noting on February 1 in the Chanhassen Villager there was a wonderful article on retiring Fire Chief Don Johnson, who indicated in 2014 when Chief Johnson started they had 600 calls and nine years later they had 1,300 calls. Ms. Paulson noted Carver County is the fastest-growing in the State of Minnesota and with even more growth comes transportation of people and all the amenities, building, staff, etc. At a meeting the previous week, she noted a presentation about roads and reducing West 78th Street to one lane east/west, reduce the median, add some turn lanes, and parallel parking. She asked how they would respond to fires and major incidents with only one fire house a block away from City Hall and this huge development. Ms. Paulson spoke about traffic flow, and being stuck in that area depending on traffic light patterns and wonders how the city will respond to a family on the other side of town whose home is burning. She is asking them to work together to think about the fire response times that may go up, and the quaintness of the city becoming a tall tunnel. Ms. Paulson stated three stories is fine, but six stories is not. She spoke about public information regarding a development in Milwaukee, The Community Within The Corridor, which was a former industrial site. The company present tonight, as well as three minor developers developed a building, and there was TCE in the soil as previously mentioned. As read in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, she noted on March 25, 2023, 150 people were evacuated from the building and the company offered them each $5,000 and no further lawsuits with a 7-day time limit to sign. Other public information noted on April 2, 2023 said that the state could prosecute the developers, and on June 19, information regarding paying tenants to end leases. Ms. Paulson shared about the DNR notifying the developers regarding a vapor mitigation system to vent the TCE, and that the Wisconsin Economic Development and Housing Association gave $19.7 million to develop, a TIF for $3.15 million, and $17.43 million from the federal government. She also noted the developers were granted a $750,000 environmental clean-up loan. Ms. Paulson is not asserting that the soil in Chanhassen is bad; however, it is good to know this public information in dealing with developers. She spoke about the 21 tenants who did not take the $5,000 payoff who were each given $25,000 and still have the right to sue for health issues in the future. Ms. Paulson asked the Commissioners to consider whether they want to preserve the attraction of Chanhassen to be one of the best cities to live in or whether they will just become a tunnel city with skyscrapers. 543 Planning Commission Minutes – February 20, 2024 7 Leah Olson, 2034 Stone Creek Drive, grew up in Chanhassen, noting when she would come back from college she would see new things being added each year, including a cookie-cutter neighborhood on Prince’s land, the farmlands across from the studio becoming warehouse office space, and now Prince’s mural is also being destroyed. She thinks this is quite disheartening and she asked about the process of getting word out to the community as she and many friends had not heard about this project until a few weeks previous or had no idea this was happening. She spoke about getting communication out to a younger audience including using social media to receive responses. Ms. Olson shared about the Chanhassen Cinema, theater trends coming back after Covid, and she noted that the urban sprawl cannot really be stopped but poses the question about whether the Chanhassen Cinema needs to be demolished or if there are adaptive reuse options. She asked about the research of community feedback, theater trends, and into the need of retail spaces within Chanhassen as some have said they are becoming “Chainhassen.” Mark Frisbie, 7460 Longview Circle, works at the Country Inn and Suites and noted Chanhassen needs a good hotel in that same location. He spoke about the importance of the location of Chanhassen noting the Chanhassen Dinner Theater brings in guests all year from surrounding states and communities. On a full weekend there are at least 250 guests spending their money in Chanhassen. Local businesses also rely on a good quality hotel for employees coming in from all over the world. Due to the local wedding venues that have popped up in the area, the hotel is booked many weekends and he asked where those guests will stay? The Country Inn and Suites is a three story hotel which is a pretty impressive size visually. Mr. Frisbie asked them to imagine another two stories on top of that noting that is a massive building and is too large for this community. Debbie Lloyd, 7302 Laredo Drive, noted her ride out of town will be greatly impacted by a development of this size. She spoke about a memo from HKGI in the packet and noted the opening paragraph states “shared parking in this district is beneficial to reduce the amount of parking needed by allowing spaces to be used by multiple users at different times.” Ms. Lloyd noted it would be beneficial for Roers Companies to share parking with others, but will not be beneficial to Kraus-Anderson who has all the other parking that is currently shared. When they want to come in and develop they will have a bigger burden of parking to deal with. In the same memo, it speaks about city’s zoning code requiring 1.5 spaces per unit, yet a 1.38 spaces per unit ratio was used. Ms. Lloyd noted the calculation of 496 parking spaces falls 42 spaces short of the zoning code requirement. She believes that should be a variance in the report. She noted the city has waited a long time and stated “let’s do it right.” She spoke about the extension of Laredo Drive noting the short stretch going to West 78th Street and asked them to imagine how many cars could stack up there, as there is one in and one out, which is not sufficient for the number of units. She spoke about the congestion from schools, the fire station safety issue, post office, and thinks traffic should be studied before it is presented to the public. Regarding walkability, she has to laugh, as it would be meandering through and looking up at a six-story building. Ms. Lloyd noted this is not the Chanhassen she wants to stay in. She contacted the artist Mr. G, who came from New Zealand on his own dime to paint the Prince mural, and he replied that if they commission him, and fly him over, he will come back and create a powerful new concept. Jim Gunville, 7608 Kiowa Avenue, read the documents in the packet and asked if it is correct on the east building with around 120 apartments there were 60 parking spaces below. He noted that 544 Planning Commission Minutes – February 20, 2024 8 is not even one car space per unit, and where it said another 60 spaces will be available outside, he asked where that parking will be? Mr. Gunville did not realize the extension to Laredo is like a long driveway and there is a barrier there. Parking will be in front or behind the building to get to the apartment building. Having enough parking is a great concern to Mr. Gunville and he asked the Commissioners to please look at it again. Regarding the vision of Chanhassen, he stated the openness and ability to see something off in the distance is very valuable, and a six- story building will prevent some of the things that makes the community what it is. Regarding an earlier comment about a hotel, Mr. Gunville agrees noting it is amazing how much traffic the hotel brings into town and the city needs to be able to support people coming into Chanhassen. He noted development is fine and this is a nice plan, but Mr. Gunville does not think it is a plan for Chanhassen. He asked the Commissioners to think about how people will be able to maneuver in the area, the height, traffic, visibility, and feel, and whether it is a place people will want to be or they will want to get out. Andrew Klinkner, 7606 Kiowa Avenue, asked whether this is the best solution for this space, noting he thinks the hotel and movie theater space can become better. Having a hotel near the dinner theater is needed as it brings a lot of people to town, noting when he travels all over the world and mentions Chanhassen people talk about the Chanhassen Dinner Theater and Prince. Possibly forcing the developer to allow some sort of ownership in the buildings could be very useful with people putting down roots here. Regarding parking capacity, he noted they are not at full capacity right now and it is already kind-of crazy around there so he wonders what that will be like. He asked if there has been a study done on requests or permits for commercial spots in town and noted Wayzata still has commercial spaces open 10 years after the Promenade redevelopment. He agrees the plan and buildings are beautiful and remembers a meeting with boards showing potential options and people could put red stickers (bad idea) and green stickers (good idea). He would like to see those boards again and believes the five- and six-story boards had a lot of red stickers on them. He asked how this development benefits the people who live here, noting the city was named number one for a reason, or whether it benefits Roers Companies and those who would move into the apartments. He does think the city needs more population density but does not think it needs to happen right in that location. Mark Engebretson, 7605 Iroquois Street, noted since moving here for the small town feel in 2015 he has noticed a lot of changes, and stated he was disappointed when Venue was built. After hearing about this development, he shared his disappointment with communication and timing, noting he got a postcard in the mail. Mr. Engebretson stated the public this evening has not come up clapping and being excited about this development. People like the quaint, small-town feel of Chanhassen and he noted the importance of the hotel for out-of-town family to stay in. He agrees with previous comments that this is not right for the city. Regarding traffic, Mr. Engebretson would love to see an animation of current traffic versus adding hundreds more cars. He does not think seeing high-rises is good for Chanhassen, and if people wanted that, they would have moved to Uptown. He does not like the tall buildings in Victoria and feels sorry for the city. He asked if they offer market-rate apartments in the building, is the TIF something the developer needs to get, and why do the citizens have to lose out of potential tax revenue for the city? If the apartments were low-income or subsidized, he would be in favor of some kind tax benefits for the developer but not with full market-rate. Mr. Engebretson stated the Venue was a bad idea and a six-story building is 10 times as bad. He can deal with having a three-story hotel, but not 545 Planning Commission Minutes – February 20, 2024 9 having two buildings next to each other that are six or seven stories. He would like to see research that this is the best option for the city. He asked the Commissioners to try to make concessions on height of the building, traffic, and making it better for Chanhassen, noting the government is here for the people and not the developers. Ann Jeske, 506 West 76th Street, noted recently she was assessed about $5,000 for a road and she wonders why Roers Companies, who are very wealthy and do well, are getting TIF money. It does not make sense to give TIF money to very profitable developers who are making decisions and the public is coming in afterwards telling how they feel when a decision has already been made. She feels “shame on you” that the public was not more involved, there was not more communication, noting this is a huge bottleneck for anyone living south of Lotus Lake, noting the high amount of traffic to get in and out of the area. Ms. Jeske understands the need for density and multiple types of housing, but noted this is not the location. She suggested the density could be added coming in on Highway 5 but not in a very dense area where they are already struggling with traffic. Many residents enjoy the city and wide-open spaces but are now being taxed for new roads for people coming into the city who do not even have ownership. She asked the Commissioners to reconsider the location noting many people in Chanhassen will not be happy. Charlie Littfin, 7609 Laredo Drive, lives across from an elementary school and noted that road is busy enough already and they do not need 500 more cars in that area. He stated this is already a done-deal and he has seen enough go down in this town to know that it has already been decided and he asked how long this has been in the works? By the time the residents heard about Venue it was already three years in and was already a done-deal. He remembers a meeting like this when they were already picking paint colors for the apartments by the time people heard about it. Mr. Littfin has seen it his whole life in this town, that if people have money, they can come in and do whatever they want. He noted this is not the town that he wants to live in and if it goes through it will be one more step for him to leave because it is not the small town that it used to be. Debbie Lloyd, 7302 Laredo Drive, believes a variance is required for the parking and must be put in the packet that goes to Council. Therefore, she thinks it would mean the Commissioners must prove a variance on that tonight and the packet needs to be revised. She noted minimum standards were not met in her opinion. Judy Harder, 541 W 78th Street, lives in the Venue apartments and wants to speak up for herself, noting good people are moving in there. Chair Noyes closed the public hearing. Chair Noyes asked Mr. Maass to show the slide regarding the public communications related to this project. He noted communication began in early January and there has been a valiant attempt to communicate with people. He noted the city would love to hear feedback regarding the types of communications put forth on projects like this. He clarified the city has a Comprehensive Plan that prescribes what land-use is and zoning for the city. The job of the Planning Commission is to make sure that any proposals meet what is prescribed in the Comprehensive Plan and the 546 Planning Commission Minutes – February 20, 2024 10 ordinances that support it. Some changes were made regarding the Central Business District and what buildings should look like, with retail mixed in with residential, and those discussions went on for months. If people do not like the blueprint, there are ways to change it through the Planning Commission. He wants the Commissioners to keep that in mind with all the great opinions from residents and must be tied-in. Commissioner Soller noted the strategy for the city has already been set and the job of this Commission is to say whether this fits within that strategy or not. It is not in their purview to change the strategy. If people disagree with the strategy they must hold this Commission and elected officials to account. Commissioner Alto spoke regarding strains on sewer and water noting it is not just the city that decides the Comprehensive Plan, but the Met Council who oversees all metropolitan areas. They determine how much volume every plot of land in the city should have based on projections of waste and water. She grew up in Chanhassen and chose to return and rent for 15 years. She stated that she added value to the community and renters are not just transient people looking to come only for a year. Commissioner Alto noted many of them live here long-term and add value to the community. She spoke about the Economic Development Commission, the Planning Commission, and loves that everyone came to offer feedback tonight, which does not always happen. She encouraged the public to sign up for the newsletter to read the packets and agendas, and to continue to put pressure on the city regarding communication. Commissioner Schwartz is concerned that many of the comments regarding communication are one-sided and the burden is solely upon the city to communicate. He suggests it is a two-way street and the citizens and the city need to do a better job of communicating. The burden cannot solely be on the city’s shoulders and noted the city works hard to communicate to people and if people do not subscribe to the bulletins or look at the website that is not the city’s fault. People must take part and get involved in their government and if they did so, they would have known about the project and been more prepared to share their thoughts this evening. Commissioner Schwartz noted once a Comprehensive Plan is in place, a property owner can do whatever they want to with their property as long as it conforms to the ordinances. If it does not conform, they can come to the Planning Commission and request a variance. Property laws always favor the property owner and in this case if the developer is making a request that conforms to the Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinances, they can ask for a variance and the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council whether to approve the variance or not. He encouraged everyone to get more involved in the city. Commissioner Goff spoke about multiple meetings and open houses held to put together a vision for downtown Chanhassen Business District. It was talked about, reviewed, and feedback was received. He noted Roers Companies has come in with a proposal that meets most of it and the city is following the rules put forth. On whether it is a “done-deal,” if they follow the rules put forth and they own the land, then they can build it. Commissioner Alto asked about the narrowing of West 78th Street, and if that is part of the approval tonight. 547 Planning Commission Minutes – February 20, 2024 11 Mr. Maass replied road designs of public roads are the purview of the city through a road planning project. Specifically to the proposal before them this evening, no, it has no purview for anything that occurs within the right-of-way for West 78th Street or Market Boulevard. He noted the City Council is discussing a reconstruction of Market Boulevard and weighing options for what the future of the roads could look like. He said any length-to-length reconstruction of West 78th Street is many years out. Project Engineer Erik Henricksen spoke about the public input process on roadways, with open conversations with residents on needs and wants. The extension of West 78th Street was looked at with the lens of future planning of what could be possible with more of a complete street design which incorporates bike users, pedestrians, all to accommodate the downtown vision. Regarding the increase of volume in this development, with existing uses compared to proposed use, analysis found a reduction in daily volumes created. Commissioner Alto asked about the traffic study and parking standards and how adding apartments, shopping, and a restaurant would decrease the traffic capacity coming through. Mr. Henricksen shared about traffic counts, peak volumes, and the use of calculations to anticipate traffic volumes. Commissioner Alto asked about the parking calculation of 1.3 versus 1.5 spaces per unit. Mr. Maass noted the city’s zoning code has a basis and the parking study looked at empirical standards, averaging it, and looking at what would be generated by an average vertical mixed-use building. Chair Noyes believes the study also took into account the demand for parking spaces at Venue. Mr. Maass replied in the affirmative. In looking at parking at the rear of the Venue, it has been at or above 95% occupancy with a total of 135 surface spots in the rear. Staff’s observations is that there is ample capacity in that surface lot without taking into account the Southwest Transit Ramp which is not proposed as part of the parking allocation for this project. Staff did recommend increasing the easement from 20 spots to 50 spots to allow additional parking for the east building. Commissioner Soller clarified the requirements by city standards are being met. Mr. Maass explained part of the code that talks about mixed-use buildings and parking shall be determined by the city based on existing and potential uses of that building. Therein lies the ability for the city to conduct a parking study to determine the number of spots required for the project in place of the standard requirements. Commissioner Soller asked if those are the grounds on which a variance in this case would not be required. Mr. Maass replied in the affirmative. 548 Planning Commission Minutes – February 20, 2024 12 Commissioner Alto spoke about previous conversations about the downtown vision and not having West 78th Street as the “main drag” for Chanhassen and instead looked at Laredo as an alternative. She noted this project does not lend itself in going that direction as proposed with garage ramp exits located just past a stoplight but she does not know what the traffic consequences or alternatives would be. Mr. Maass replied the intention is that West 78th Street evolves into the main street. Laredo is an extension of that with the same ideals of pedestrian walkability, shopping, and residences. With garages coming off Laredo, it is the lower-class road and the alternative would be coming off West 78th Street, which is not preferred. Commissioner Schwartz asked if the city is planning to narrow West 78th Street and the median between east and west. Mr. Maass replied the city is not proposing to reduce the right-of-way width. The city is contemplating the Market Boulevard reconstruction and making sure there are adequate turn lanes, through lanes, and when a future project comes for West 78th Street. The City Council is considering what happens east of Kerber Boulevard and Great Plains Boulevard. Commissioner Schwartz asked with whatever happens east of Kerber Boulevard heading south on Laredo, will there be room for vehicle traffic to accommodate a fire truck to access West 78th Street. Mr. Maass replied the engineering department is working closely with the fire department in potential design alternatives for West 78th Street. They want to continue to support the 4th of July parade route and noted the way the city designs a street is a different discussion as Roers Companies has no bearing on that item. Commissioner Soller asked about runoff and impervious space and clarified it does not increase impervious space that much and it is being mitigated by the requirements of the project. Mr. Maass replied in the affirmative noting the applicant is required to go through city permitting and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District which is one of the more difficult and strict districts in the State. The stormwater generated for the site will be accounted for. Commissioner Soller asked if the city has ever commissioned a noise pollution study for the area and asked if that need to happen in the future to ensure quality of life and standards are being met in Chanhassen? Mr. Maass replied the city has not commissioned a noise study, noting a study is typically generated as a result of large infrastructure, such as highway projects, to determine whether sound walls are necessary. 549 Planning Commission Minutes – February 20, 2024 13 Commissioner Jobe asked about the cisterns in the middle of the road and would the city be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of those if a structural failure occurred, and how common is that scenario. Mr. Maass replied the operations and maintenance agreement would dictate that Roers Companies would own and maintain the system. In the future if the road extended and there was a solution to the stormwater treatment, that system could be abandoned, but that would be at the city’s discretion. Commissioner Goff asked if this is the only time the Planning Commission will see this project. Mr. Maass replied at this point, unless the Planning Commission tables, this would be the only time they would see the project. Commissioner Schwartz asked if the Venue is being used as a precedent for another six-story building in downtown Chanhassen. Mr. Maass hesitates to use the word precedent, and during the design guidelines conversation they heard a lot of feedback that it is tall enough and people would like even less. That is the reason behind the establishment of the height maximum within the current ordinance. Commissioner Schwartz recalled previous conversations about not becoming like Eden Prairie with building heights of six stories or higher, but noted that now seems to be the standard and there is no challenge to that on the part of staff. Mr. Maass noted six stories is the standard wood-frame construction, and in terms of comparison to Eden Prairie, he goes back to the desire in the city’s architectural guidelines in that buildings don’t change material just to change material and he does not believe the project before the Commissioners does that. Commissioner Schwartz thinks there should be a discussion amongst the Commissioners regarding the old, small-village look and feel of Chanhassen and how that is being transformed. Commissioner Alto noted they had that discussion in September when they discussed the design guidelines. They talked about maximum height and what the Commission would require if they were going to allow six stories. She noted it was shopping on the first floor, a 10-foot setback, and stated it is already approved and in the code because of those discussions. She clarified being on the Planning Commission has helped to understand the rights of property owners to do what is within code. Commissioner Soller likes the suggested action in the packet that breaks this into two motions. He is not sure he has heard enough to confidently vote on the second action yet. Several questions came up from the public such as if this is market-rate, and a profitable project, why does the city need to do a TIF. Or, if this site is valuable and profitable, does the city need to give that advantage to a developer, maybe there would be a competitor that comes in without a TIF. 550 Planning Commission Minutes – February 20, 2024 14 Chair Noyes clarified regarding TIF, the Commissioners are contemplating whether this TIF plan is consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. They are not voting on whether the developer should get TIF, whether they deserve TIF, or how much the TIF should be. He noted it is within the structure, and while one could argue whether they should get any money, it is a completely different conversation and outside the purview of the Planning Commission. Commissioner Alto asked if there is a place that discussion happens where the public can provide their input on those decisions before it comes to the Planning Commission. Mr. Maass replied on March 11, the City Council is scheduled to have a public hearing with respect to the TIF. The City Council is the designated Economic Development Authority and they would approve or deny a TIF request. Chair Noyes spoke about the cinema and the hotel and noted he would like them to stay, as well, but they are private businesses and the decision has been made to close the cinema. He noted the City of Chanhassen is not going to get into the movie theater or hotel business. Commissioner Soller noted a lot of the write-in feedback surrounded the mural, and it is a historically and culturally significant site. If the original artist was willing to come back, he encouraged the city to consider that heavily. It is a shame to see history paved over. Chair Noyes stated the Commissioners do not vote on this based on whether they think it is a good project. They vote on whether it complies with the ordinances and plans the city has put in place. A member of the public asked about West 78th Street and widening the road. Mr. Maass explained West 78th Street is a mixture of 80- and 100-foot right-of-way currently. With the traffic study, the city looked at whether additional right-of-way is necessary, and the engineering department has reviewed that with the traffic study and deemed it not necessary. He noted the city is not boxing itself in. Commissioner Soller moved, Commissioner Alto seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approve the requested build to zone variance and adopt the findings of fact and decision. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Jobe seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the requested preliminary plat and site plan contingent upon compliance with the city staff review memo and adopt a resolution finding the TIF plan for TIF district number 13 is consistent with the City of Chanhassen’s Comprehensive Plan. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. GENERAL BUSINESS: None. 551 Planning Commission Minutes – February 20, 2024 15 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES DATED JANUARY 16, 2024 Commissioner Goff moved, Commissioner Jobe seconded to approve the Chanhassen Planning Commission summary minutes dated January 16, 2024 as presented. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. COMMMISSION PRESENTATIONS: None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: None. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION: None. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Soller seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Submitted by Eric Maass Planning Director 552 Hello Mr. Maass: I had attended the January 17, 2024 Public Open House to learn about the proposed market-rate apartment buildings for downtown Chanhassen. In my opinion, the complexes seem too massive and dense for the space they would occupy. They don't seem like they would fit in well with the rest of downtown and nearby residences. To me, it looks like the developer is looking to maximize the number of units possible to the detriment of the surrounding area..I think that the proposed parking spots seem small too.. Would smaller buildings possibly be considered? Please share my thoughts with the Chanhassen Planning Commission as well. Thank you for hearing my opinion. Respectfully, Patricia Hastreiter 6990 Tecumseh Lane Chanhassen 553 From: Beth Mastel Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 9:24 AM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Downtown Redevelopment: People and traffic density Concern: High people and traffic density due to the increase of 310 apartments with the potential of 408 extra cars in an already saturated space. Redevelopment of this space is needed, agreed. However, adding an extra ?1000-1500? additional residents in 4 acres of property along with a potential of 408 extra cars does not do any favors for current residents. I don’t want to feel like I’m in Wayzata. They’ve ruined their ‘used to be’ quaint destination. You can’t get that back. Please, please, during this needed renovation with goals to make Chanhassen ‘current’, don’t lose our ‘quaintness’ among decisions for city revenue and increased residential density. This is an exciting time for Chanhassen residents. Thank you for serving our community! Beth Mastel Chanhassen resident for 23 years 554 From: Renee Squires Date: February 19, 2024 at 9:49:16 PM CST To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Prince mural My concern with this development is the future of the Prince mural. I want to see this saved. Thousands of people come to Chanhassen every year to visit Paisley Park. We are Prince’s home. The only thing we have left is the highway being dedicated to him. We should be capitalizing on the fact that people come to chanhassen to go to the Park. I am surprised Chanhassen doesn’t have more Prince landmarks or sites for fans to want to come into the downtown area when here. If we give them reasons to come into downtown chanhassen, visitors will then shop in our stores and eat in our restaurants etc. I know many people who feel the same as me in regard to the Prince mural being saved somehow. Thank you. Renee Squires 555 From: Andrea Rich Date: February 19, 2024 at 11:45:18 PM CST To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Planning commission As a citizen of Chanhassen I take great pride in our city. It is a wonderful place to live and we enjoy sharing it with visitors. While I am all for progress, I do have concerns with the proposed Roers Companies redevelopment. One of the concerns is with the Prince mural. As a beloved member of our community that gave so much to us, it is essential that we maintain this important tribute. In addition, we need quality hotel accommodations in our area. We have many visitors that come to visit and, as you are quite aware, there are thousands of people that visit our area for various events and areas of interest. Paisley Park alone brings thousands of visitors annually. Lastly, we miss the cinema and would love to see one return to our area. Thank you for your consideration and willingness to take under advisement the concerns of your citizens. Sincerely, Andrea Rich 7901 Autumn Ridge Avenue Chanhassen, MN 55317 556 From: Darren.Anderson Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2024 4:08 PM To: Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: cinema & hotel redevelopment Hi Eric, I’m supportive of the project – it makes sense to me to add some higher density housing/apartments in the downtown area given the proximity to most amenities such as grocery stores, restaurants, pharmacies, etc. I think it will also increase use of the SW transit station nearby. The site design is appealing with the buildings closer to the street/sidewalks and parking behind. The more “U” shape design seems more inviting than the “island” design of the building behind (forget the name, but the building with Spalon, Wink, etc. I think that was a huge flop and missed opportunity how that building was designed looking outward in all directions. I was wondering how the existing roads would handle the incremental traffic but see the plans accommodate an additional future through-road, which seems like it would take some pressure off Market Blvd. I’m very supportive of more restaurant space – NOT more fast casual. Kudos on putting Zapas with a drive through on hold. I think that would be a mistake to add all of that car traffic given the plans for the future Municipal campus which looks to be more pedestrian friendly. Thanks, Darren 557 From: David Benedict Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 9:24 AM To: Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Chan Cinema/Hotel Redevelopment See my feedback below- •For the restaurants- do they have outdoor seating opportunities? I would like to see roof seating or outdoor patio seating options for visitors. •Density: Why can't the 5 stories be 6 stories? Can we add more interior parking? •In regards to the surface parking lot on NE side of plot: o Is that a city requirement? Or market driven by storefronts? o Ideally, I would want the 5 story building to extend to W 78th (ie bring building much closer to the street) while moving parking into interior parking lots o If we cannot, I would reduce the parking as much as possible and increase the W 78th pedestrian areas- the Dinner theater will be redeveloped and this will become a main pedestrian thoroughfare (and I'm still mad Aldi wasn't brought to the street) •Downstream effects... with the only hotel downtown going away, do we have line of sight into future hotels? How can we incentivize? •Is Laredo drive extension really going to happen? Thank you, David Benedict 558 Message submitted from the <Chanhassen, MN> website. Site Visitor Name: Brian Hauth I generally support the development, but have a few recommendations. 1. Bring the north edge of the east building farther to the north to the edge of the sidewalk and relocate the parking to behind the building or underground. This will bring the retail space to the street, giving more visibility and creating a more walkable downtown feel. 2. Shift the sidewalk that is north of the east building, to the south, to create a wide boulevard (6- 10’) between 78th St and the sidewalk. Having sidewalk that butts right up against the roadway creates a very unsafe feeling for the pedestrian, meaning that very few people will use that sidewalk. 3. Ensure the sidewalk is wide enough for multi-use. This would be 8-10 feet wide. 5-6 foot wide sidewalks are not sufficient to allow walkers and bikers. If we want to create a walkable downtown, 8-10 ft width should be what we’re striving for. 4. Does the east building have underground parking? Consider moving the residential parking entrance to the rear (south) of the east building, off of Market Street, to create a more pedestrian- friendly entry along 78th street. 5. Anything that helps separate vehicles from pedestrians would be helpful, to create the downtown feeling that people strive for. Thanks for the consideration. Brian Hauth 7131 Alphabet St Chanhassen, MN 55317 559 From: Audrey Johnson Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 3:07 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Prince Mural / Chanhassen Theater I am writing to express comments about the Roers Company Downtown Redevelopment project that includes the dearly departed Chanhassen Cinema with Prince’s beautiful mural on the side wall facing the Country Inn & Suites Hotel. As evidenced by Prince stories from those who worked directly with him, celebrities, and locals alike, there is much history in this iconic block of real estate. I’m sure you are aware that Mr. G (artist Graham Hoete) traveled from Australia to paint a mural that is a one of a kind work of art visited and viewed by thousands and thousands of people from around the world since it’s installation in 2016. Chanhassen is like a second home to many of us from around the world that revisit the site over and over again during the last almost eight years. While change and growth is inevitable, such an iconic and one-of-a-kind mural is a gift to your city - as well as the legacy of Prince - that deserves preservation! I implore the City of Chanhassen Council members to defend this historic piece of art that could never be replicated. I know you have the ability to impose certain conditions upon your approval in the many steps ahead of this development process. It will not only affect visitors to this famous site in the coming years for the city but could even go so far as to have an economic impact in many ways to the local businesses and residents that visit the mural almost daily. Thank you in advance for your service and commitment to the beautiful City of Chanhassen and its future development for all who love it and, more importantly, those affected most directly by future development. Lifelong Prince Rogers Nelson Supporter Audrey Johnson 560 From: Nancy Smith Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 2:13 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Traffic control Will the intersection by Jimmy John’s remain open to Crossing into Market Square?Cub and businesses? That’s already a very busy and dangerous crossing or turning left. Thank you, N Smith 561 From: Jeff Commander Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 1:41 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Proposed projects for hotel and cinema Please start the demo!! Three of the people in my neighborhood that are opposed to the project don’t plan to live here in five years. The majority of the people I hang out with want it to happen. 562 From: Hal Newell Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 1:37 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Roers develop[ment Dear Sir / Madam; I think Chanhassen needs to move away from the, "15 minute city", dense pack myopia and preoccupation with tax revenue. Moreover, we do not need any more of this silly first floor boutique retail garbage. Shops in these types of locations have a high turnover rate with one retailer going broke and the next moving in. Let concentrate on putting available space to better use than just another apartment building. Sincerely, Hal Newell 563 From: Will Annett Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 12:21 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: 78th Street Redevelopment Project Hello, Although I realize the plans for redeveloping the former Chanhassen Cinema building and surrounding area are in an early stage, I have a few questions and observations: Will the development enhance the experience of being in Chanhassen? The current architectural renderings have all the charm of a Soviet apartment complex. And while downtown Chanhassen has never been a model of new urbanism, it seems that an opportunity to improve the street-level experience of walking in the city center is being overlooked. I would favor designs and materials that echo classic downtowns like those in Excelsior, Stillwater, and the Old Town district in Minneapolis. These are places where pedestrians want to stroll and linger, and stimulate commerce by shopping and dining. Which segues to the next point. What is the proposed mix of street-level retail and dining? Sadly, Chanhassen lives up to the disparaging moniker, “Chainhassen.” With the exception of some notable independently owned and operated spots like Tequila Butcher and Chanhassen Brewery, it is a vast wasteland of franchises. By creating a new space that encourages original independent restauranteurs and retailers to launch businesses, the city will encourage visitors to stay longer, enjoy unique experiences, spend money, and return frequently to do it all over again. What will happen to the Prince mural? Dominating the side of the Chanhassen Cinema building, the vibrant, colorful image of Prince is a splash of life and culture in an otherwise dreary and monotonous suburban landscape. Since its creation in the wake of the musician’s death in 2016, it has become an iconic fixture and favorite of many Chan residents—whether they are fans of Prince’s music or not. Just as Liverpool, England celebrates the lives its most famous native sons— the Beatles—with public murals and sculptures and other attractions, Chanhassen should embrace its most renowned inhabitant. Beyond civic pride and cultural connection, it can also be a differentiator that draws tourism. Thank you for taking the time to review my questions and comments. I look forward to learning more about the redevelopment project in the weeks to come. Sincerely, Will Annett Pioneer Pass Neighborhood, Chahassne 564 From: Anne-Marie Cookson Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 1:22 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: ROERS Company Development Comments I have lived at VENUE apartments since opening day 4.5 years ago, and I can say that this is one of the best uses of this space imaginable, and it has added so much to Chanhassen in every way, from increased revenue to local businesses to increased tax revenue to the city and Carver County, plus it's a fantastic place to live!! I wholeheartedly support the new plans under consideration and believe that a mix of additional residential with retail & restaurants, plus improved use of parking, new sidewalks and crosswalks makes tremendous sense for downtown Chanhassen and will benefit all people in the surrounding area, not just apartment dwellers or business owners. We owe it to the future of Chanhassen and its citizens to be proactive and move on the opportunities that present themselves when all parties and circumstances align. There are so many instances when a perfect opportunity is delayed or vetoed and the opportunity is lost for years to come, sometimes forever. Very excited at the prospect of the property adjacent to VENUE being redeveloped and appreciate all the Mayor and Council are doing to keep us informed! The renderings for both the Roers development AND the City Park redevelopment are really great! Thank you and good luck! Anne-Marie Cookson VENUE /Chanhassen Resident 565 From: Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 12:44 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Roers Companies Downtown Redevelopment Public Comment I am writing to express comments about the Roers Company Downtown Redevelopment project that includes the dearly departed Chanhassen Cinema with Prince’s beautiful mural on the side wall facing the Country Inn & Suites Hotel. As evidenced by Prince stories from those who worked directly with him, celebrities, and locals alike, there is much history in this iconic block of real estate. I’m sure I don’t have to give you information on how Mr. G (artist Graham Hoete) traveled from Australia to paint a mural that is a one of a kind work of art visited and viewed by thousands and thousands of people from around the world since it’s installation in 2016. Chanhassen is like a second home to many of us from around the world that revisit the site over and over again during the last almost eight years. While change and growth is inevitable, such an iconic and one-of-a-kind mural is a gift to your city - as well as the legacy of Prince - that deserves preservation! I implore the City of Chanhassen Council members to defend this historic piece of art that could never be replicated. There are engineering challenges for sure, but as a Zoning Board of Appeals Chair in DeKalb County, Georgia and lifelong Prince fan, I know you have the ability to impose certain conditions upon your approval in the many steps ahead of this development process. It will not only affect visitors to this famous site in the coming years for the city but could even go so far as to have an economic impact in many ways to the local businesses and residents that visit the mural almost daily. Thank you in advance for your service and commitment to the beautiful City of Chanhassen and its future development for all who love it and, more importantly, those affected most directly by future development N Rivers-Johnson Prince Fam for Life 566 -----Original Message----- From: Brenda Vatland Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 12:30 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Roers development I not in favor of the height of the buildings, the density of the development, and the two bedroom units only having one parking stall. I do not agree with the amount of traffic this development will add to west 78th street. I do not want to see TIF money given to this project Thank you Brenda Vatland 7290 Kurvers Pt Rd Chanhassen 567 From: Maria Tyiska Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 4:45 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Urgent Appeal for Preservation of Prince's Mural in Roers Company Downtown Redevelopment Project Dear Members of the City of Chanhassen Council, I am reaching out to share my sentiments regarding the Roers Company Downtown Redevelopment project, particularly concerning the Chanhassen Cinema site adorned with Prince's iconic mural, an integral part of the city's rich history. The mural, masterfully crafted by Mr. G (artist Graham Hoete) in 2016, has become a unique work of art drawing admiration from people worldwide. Its presence has contributed to transforming Chanhassen into a second home for many, attracting visitors who repeatedly revisit this cherished site over the past nearly eight years. While recognizing the inevitability of transformation and progress, I wish to emphasize that this mural is a precious gift to the city and a significant part of Prince's legacy. Its preservation is paramount. As a Prince enthusiast, I understand the complexities involved. I urge you, as council members, to consider imposing conditions during the approval process to address engineering challenges - safeguard, and preserve this irreplaceable piece of art. Beyond its cultural significance, the mural plays a crucial role in attracting visitors, contributing to the local economy, and enhancing the daily lives of residents. The potential loss of such a landmark could have far-reaching impacts. I commend and appreciate your commitment to the splendid City of Chanhassen and its continuous advancement. Your service is vital to ensuring that this unique mural continues to be a source of pride for residents and a draw for visitors. Thank you for your consideration and commitment to preserving the cultural heritage of Chanhassen. Sincerely, Maria Tyiska -- “Dont stress over what could have been; chances are if it should have been, it would have been." ~Unknown 568 ____________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/departments/community- development/planning/proposed-development-projects/chanhassen-cinema-hotel- redevelopment A significant part of the allure of Chanhassen stems from the charming appeal of its architecture. Commercial buildings reflect detailing that fits well with the style of residential spaces along with ample green space. Careful planning and consideration is paramount as changes and improvements are being considered. There is a proposed development currently being considered for space now occupied by the Country Inn and Suites by Radisson. These proposed plans are concerning for several reasons. Proposed Building Height Most of the buildings in downtown Chanhassen are three stories tall or lower. The new development plan proposes a six-story building extending to the sidewalks at the intersection of 78th St. and Market Blvd. This would significantly alter the open feel that now exists to a highly urbanized appearance. Plans exist to build a new Community Center at the northwest corner of this intersection where a park now exists. Adding this proposed development would significantly change the visual dynamics of the area. Expand the greenspace area in the proposed development 78th St. to create a park area to replace the one planned for the new Community Center. Doing this provides a convenient place for the new building’s residents to relax with their families and friends. It could also offer a location for a Farmer’s Market and local craftspeople to sell their products, thereby attracting shoppers to nearby establishments. Consider adapting a plan that includes restaurant and retail space along the streets that does not exceed one story. Incorporate space at the street level for restaurants to offer private outdoor seating. This feature has become popular at places such as Brendisi’s Pub and Axel’s, where it welcomes foot traffic to these establishments. There is no space allotted for this in the developer’s current plan. Reserve additional building height to areas of the building that do not encroach on the roadways. Limit overall height to no more than four stories, preferably racing the south, back side of existing buildings. Architectural Style The Country Inn is a three-story building with a slanted roof. This style, with roofline variations, reflects the surrounding homes. It does not overwhelm in the same way the Venue, located east of the proposed redevelopment does. Heritage Park Apartments, west of Great Plains Blvd. and Chan View Drive are styled in a way that complements neighboring homes. The rooflines, integrated balconies, and detailing gives these residences a homey feel. Slanted roof lines are better suited for inevitable snow accumulations than flat-roof designs. Balconies provide privacy with the advantage that they do not look like afterthoughts. The facade is broken up by interesting details. Tax Incremental Financing (TIF) Sell municipal bonds as an investment rather than increase property or sales tax. The higher residents are taxed, the less attractive a city becomes. Traffic Management The proposed buildings would add increased housing units. This creates the potential for a very congested area in the center of the city. Allow for the possibility for potential widened to four lanes of 78th St. Currently, there are two lanes going west, a single lane going east. Additional housing and retail certainly include the need to accommodate an increased flow of traffic along this corridor. ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ 569 From: Connie Schibilla Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 6:49 AM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Hotel/cinema development Hoping there is a considera�on to include hotel room op�ons 1 floor per building or ? These rooms would be suite like w kitchens (same floor plan as studio or 1 bedroom apts) Benefit - no transporta�on required for dining, theatre and special events. Connie Schibilla ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ From: Christopher Goh Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 10:25 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Comments My name is Christopher Goh 521 Shadowmere, Chanhassen, MN 55317 I have lived in Chanhassen for the last 24 years and don't approve of this development!. It will increase downtown traffic considerably, change the nature of of delightful downtown and create a new block of buildings that don't fit. We don't need a high rise right in the middle of town. Chris ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ From: The Michels Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 4:41 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Roers Property/Development - TIF proposal City of Chanhassen Leadership - I am absolutely opposed to any Tax Increment Financing being given. Tired of individuals and developers feeding at the public trough. What good is development without property tax collection. This development is for market rate apartments, and there is no reason to subsidize such. Rents are at record high prices. Todd Michels 570 ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ From: Shelly Leatham Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 4:41 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Roers development proposal I do not know if I will be able to make the public hearing Monday evening, but do want to share my feedback. I like the idea of making Chanhassen a more walkable downtown area, but not by creating more six-story buildings while limiting the available parking or reducing the traffic flow along W. 78th St. I lived in Excelsior for a couple of years and appreciated the ability to walk to many of the locations I wanted to go, but part of that was because there were times that driving down Water Street was too much of a hassle. I appreciated the charm of downtown Excelsior, but none of the buildings are six stories. The Venue is not what I would envision as the direction we should continue heading for downtown Chanhassen. Six stories is not charming. Why add more? As someone who lives outside of the downtown Chanhassen area I do not love the idea of driving around to find a parking spot so I can run into a shop. That's not a big issue in the summer when the sidewalks are clear and the temperatures are warm, but living in MN we know that winters bring snow, ice, and cold, and parking a distance away because there isn't an on-street spot to be found is likely going to be the case. As you've already found with Tequila Butcher, having a lack of parking can be a problem. If there aren't going to be enough parking spaces for the people who live in the building then I anticipate that their guests will be looking for parking as well. I recognize that there is no money in public parking lots, but if you want Chanhassen to be a destination you need to have a plan for that. At the very least the developer should ensure that there is sufficient parking for all residents in the new buildings and some parking for guests. Parallel parking along W. 78th is not going to cut it. Additionally, I'm trying to figure out what the push is to create more narrow driving areas like the area around St. Hubert's/Summerwood/Culver's. The area is very congested at times with traffic backing up trying to get onto 101. I see this as an issue that we'll be dealing with in that downtown area where you're trying to reduce lanes. Laredo and W 78th gets to be a fairly busy intersection around the start of the school day and the end of the school day. There are plenty of buses and parents coming and going. On street parking does not seem like a great idea when there is a lot of traffic flowing. Parallel parking requires traffic behind the parking vehicle to stop and wait until the vehicle has parked. I favor the two lane model over the single lane model for these reasons. Finally, I feel like this is being pushed through fairly quickly without much being shared out to residents. There was an email from the Mayor on Dec 22 mentioning it, but with no additional information. Since then things have moved very rapidly. I receive the emails, which not everyone else in the community does, and I have been looking for information, which not everyone else does. As a comparison, Carver County has been finding a number of ways to ensure that residents are weighing in on waste management. In the past two months I have seen way more attempts by Carver County to receive feedback than I have seen information shared from the City on the Roers 571 development. It seems like you're actually trying to ensure you don't get feedback. In fact, I feel like there was way more information shared out regarding the Cafe Zupas potential development and moratorium regarding the drive through than I have seen regarding the Roers development, and this is a significantly larger project. Please consider not building a six-story building with insufficient parking for all residents in the downtown area. Please do not create congestion in the downtown area by reducing traffic flow, and please do not make parking more challenging for those of us who do not live close to downtown. Sincerely, Shelly Leatham 1576 Bluebill Trail Chanhassen ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ 572 From: Mary Jo Kamerud Sent: Monday, April 8, 2024 10:16 AM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Chanhassen Cinema & Hotel Redevelopment I am a long time Chanhassen resident and want to voice my opposition to the proposed Chanhassen Cinema & Hotel Redevelopment project. I frequent that area, at various times of day, and find it to be quite congested most of the time. An increase in housing and retail in that area will most likely add to that condition, making it even more dangerous for walking, biking, and driving. Another concern is the loss of a hotel within walking distance of the Dinner Theater and how that will affect that long time bus iness that really put Chanhassen on the map. Mary Jo Kamerud From: ruth slivken Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 3:29 PM To: DL City Council <Council@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Plans for Downtown Project Dear Members of the Council: Once again I feel that I must respond to the proposed plans for Downtown Chanhassen. I, and many others, do not want high rise buildings in our downtown area. Buildings of 5-6 stories are just not appropriate and will not blend in well with the small town "feel" we all enjoy currently. It will increase congestion and the problems that come with that increase in density. In exploring downtown Excelsior and Edina, I have found that they have flourished without the high rise buildings on their Main Streets. I would like to see building heights limited to 3 stories. This would npt change the underground parking plans or the retail spaces. And would still accommodate two stories of apartment housing. There is plenty of space in this area for housing development without imposing on our quaint and accessible Downtown. I hope you will reconsider your approval of the plans as they stand; and make the necessary changes to benefit all residents of Chanhassen. Sincerely, Ruth Slivken From: Andy Roberts Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2024 8:44 PM To: Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: proposed development issue I am writing to you about the proposed development involving Chanhassen Cinema and Country Suites Hotel. Country Suites shouldn't be touched because it is the best hotel to stay at. 573 My mom and sister both worked there in the past. My dad and I have stayed at that location and other Country Suite hotels across the United States. They are the best hotel in the United States. We don't need any more apartments in Chanhassen, we need the hotel because we already lost one and it is in the perfect location near the Chanhassen Dinner Theater which works for plays at the Dinner Theater if any of the cast for plays are from other states and they can stay at Country Suites and walk right over. It is also bigger than other hotels near St. Hubert's. Also the wall with the picture of Prince should be kept and considered for landmark because he meant a lot to Minnesota. The Chanhassen Cinema should re-open under new management like AMC. I have been at numerous AMC theaters and they sell pizza and some have alcohol license. Please really think about this because if I lose Country Suites in Chanhassen I will be very upset. I always tell people I know to stay at those locations including relatives that visit me from other states because Country Suites isn't far from where I live. Say NO to this development. Andy 574 78th St. & Market Blvd. Proposed Redevelopment Chansassen, MN 575 1000 Parkers Lake Rd Unnamed July 10, 2023 Minnetonka - MN W 78th St & Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN Location Map WEST 78TH STR E E T MARKET BLVDMARKET ST REET LAR EDO DR ALDI & VENUE APARTMENTS (NOT SHOWN ON AERIAL) CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATERS PROPOSED PROJECT SITE 576 1000 Parkers Lake Rd Unnamed July 10, 2023 Minnetonka - MN W 78th St & Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN Existing Site - Viewed from the North (78th St) 577 1000 Parkers Lake Rd Unnamed July 10, 2023 Minnetonka - MN W 78th St & Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN Existing Site - Viewed from West (Market Blvd) 578 1000 Parkers Lake Rd Unnamed July 10, 2023 Minnetonka - MN W 78th St & Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN Existing Site - Viewed from the South (Market Street) 579 1000 Parkers Lake Rd Unnamed July 10, 2023 Minnetonka - MN W 78th St & Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN Key Metrics: West Building: • 185 apartments • 15,000 SF retail facing 78th St • Structured parking serving residents and retail guests East Building: • 150 apartments • 8,000 SF retail facing parking lot • Structured parking serving residents • Surface parking serving retail guests Project Goals: • Increase housing within the downtown core • Redevelop several auto-oriented sites in order to help create a walkable, mixed- use neighborhood • Divide development into two separate buildings in order to allow for a future north/south street extension connecting 78th St. and Market St. 580 VENUE APARTMENTS ALDI CHANHASSEN STATION CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATERS 974 977 964 23,685 SF RETAIL PARKING6,431 SF RESIDENTIAL 8,360 SF RETAIL 3,564 SF RETAIL 960 18 STALLS 13 STALLS 13 STALLS 5 STALLS973973 FUTURE LOREDO DRIVE EXTENSION21,540 SF RESIDENTIAL 1,554 SF ROOFROOFMARKET BLVDW 78TH ST MARKET ST DN RESTAURANT PATIO 3,887 SF AMENITY 1,944 SF 8,693 SF RETAIL 4,070 SF AMENITY15,408 SF RESIDENT PARKING 3,564 SF RETAIL PLAN NORTH Scale:1" = 80'-0" Market Blvd & W 78th St DISTRICT SITE PLAN 6/21/2023 Chanhassen, MN 581 56,806 SF PARKING 44,412 SF PARKING EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO BE REPLACED IN KIND EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO BE REMOVED - FOUNDATION WALL EXPOSED HOUSING ABOVE (UNEXCAVATED) 1,428 SF BOHSLOPE UP SLOPE DN MOVE IN 35,594 SF RESIDENTIAL 29,780 SF RESIDENTIAL 7,724 SF AMENITY UNIT TERRACES 3,122 SF AMENITY PLAN NORTH Scale:1" = 80'-0" Market Blvd & W 78th St FLOOR PLANS 6/21/2023 Chanhassen, MN MINUS 1 LEVEL LEVEL 2 PLAN 582 39,119 SF RESIDENTIAL 32,841 SF RESIDENTIAL PLAN NORTH Scale:1" = 80'-0" Market Blvd & W 78th St FLOOR PLANS 6/21/2023 Chanhassen, MN TYPICAL UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 583 1000 Parkers Lake Rd Unnamed July 10, 2023 Minnetonka - MN W 78th St & Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN ESG-Designed Architecture Precedents 584 1000 Parkers Lake Rd Unnamed July 10, 2023 Minnetonka - MN W 78th St & Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN ESG-Designed Architecture Precedents 585 1000 Parkers Lake Rd Unnamed July 10, 2023 Minnetonka - MN W 78th St & Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN Victoria, MN Architecture Precedents 586 Page 1 of 12 Date: April 12, 2024 To: City of Chanhassen Mayor and City Council Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager From: Eric Maass, AICP, EDFP, Community Development Director Re: Proposed Chanhassen Cinema and Hotel Redevelopment Project Update On March 11th the City Council tabled the land use application made by Roers Companies for the redevelopment of the Chanhassen Cinema and Country Inn & Suites. The City Council tabled action the requested preliminary plat, site plan, and tax increment financing requests. The preliminary plat and site plans were tabled due to City Council concerns regarding architectural design and parking available to the project. Due to the scale of the project and number of attachments included in your agenda packet, staff thought it beneficial to provide a summary of changes made to date specifically as it relates to architecture and parking. That information can be found on the preceding pages. Sincerely, Eric Maass, AICP, EDFP Community Development Director 587 Page 2 of 12 Architecture – Material Palettes The City Council was presented with four possible color palettes for the project and recommended that the applicant move forward with the “Platinum & Bronze Scheme” as the basis for the redesign but to also consider the “Champagne Scheme” specifically as it related to the vertical accent metal components of the elevations. The following is the proposed material palette. West Building East Building 588 Page 3 of 12 West Building Architecture North Elevation 1. Color palette entirely changed to a grey/white/bronze color scheme in line with the “Platinum & Bronze” scheme reviewed by the City Council during work session. 2. The elevations previously had four different varieties of brick on the north elevation, the west building has been simplified to have two brick varieties. 3. The building presents with both dark and light elements to create an overall cohesive elevation. The metals panels provide added dimension to the elevation and help to break up the varieties of the various gray/white materials. 4. The top cornices are now thicker and also lighter than the surrounding materials which provide the cornice more prominence and visibility. (red boxes) 5. The balconies previously had glass railings but have been revised to have black picket style railings to provide added detailing to the exterior. 589 Page 4 of 12 East Elevation 1. Color palette entirely changed to a grey/white/bronze color scheme in line with the “Platinum & Bronze” scheme reviewed by the City Council during work session. 2. The balconies previously had glass railings but have been revised to have black picket style railings to provide added detailing to the exterior. 3. The elevation previously had four different varieties of brick on the north elevation, the west building has been simplified to have two brick varieties. 4. Area above the residential parking garage entrance was revised to add windows that more closely resemble the upper stories. This area is not an apartment unit but is bike storage/bike maintenance. (red box) 5. Due to the area over the residential garage entrance being altered the commercial space in the middle of the elevation is more prominent. (green box) 6. The brick material on the corner commercial space as well as its roofline is lighter which gives that greater prominence as well. (pink box) 590 Page 5 of 12 South Elevation 1. Color palette entirely changed to a grey/white/bronze color scheme in line with the “Platinum & Bronze” scheme reviewed by the City Council during work session. 2. The balconies previously had glass railings but have been revised to have black picket style railings to provide added detailing to the exterior. 3. The elevation previously had four different varieties of brick on the north elevation, the west building has been simplified to have two brick varieties. 4. Windows have been added to the upper portions of the pre-cast walls which reduce its overall scale. (red boxes) 5. Due to the area over the residential garage entrance being altered the commercial space in the middle of the elevation is more prominent. (green box) 6. The stairwell has been revised from a fiber cement panel material to the accent metal material providing greater relief to the wall expanse on the left side of the elevation (orange box) 591 Page 6 of 12 West Elevation 1. Color palette entirely changed to a grey/white/bronze color scheme in line with the “Platinum & Bronze” scheme reviewed by the City Council during work session. 2. The balconies previously had glass railings but have been revised to have black picket style railings to provide added detailing to the exterior. 3. The elevation previously had four different varieties of brick on the north elevation, the west building has been simplified to have two brick varieties. 4. The walkup townhome style units previously had a continuous roof line however now that roof line has been broken up into two areas and a more prominent porch area has been provided to those units. (red box) 5. The cornices on each level are thicker and more pronounced giving them greater visibility and prominence. (green boxes) 592 Page 7 of 12 East Building Architecture North Elevation 1. Color palette entirely changed along with the inclusion of two colors of brick onto the north façade. 2. The balconies previously had glass railings but have been revised to have black picket style railings to provide added detailing to the exterior. 3. The columns along the first floor now terminate at the top of the windowpane area with a heavier cornice/roof line which give the first floor area greater prominence. (orange box). 4. Removed metal pergola element on amenity deck space (green box) 593 Page 8 of 12 South Elevation 1. Color palette entirely changed including the base brick on floors 1 and 2 and a change in color for the architectural fiber cement panels on floors 3, 4, 5, and 6. 2. The balconies previously had glass railings but have been revised to have black picket style railings to provide added detailing to the exterior. 3. Added an additional horizontal band of brick to add prominence to floors 1 and 2 (orange box). 4. The stack of outdoor patios on the right side of the elevation have more prominence now that it’s adjacent to a lighter colored fiber cement panel. (red box) 594 Page 9 of 12 West Elevation 1. Reallocation of brick from on the first floor of apartment units onto the east elevation (facing W 78th) (orange box). 2. Shift in color palette and specifically the brick colors but also the fiber cement panels that are located in the center of the elevation. 3. The balconies previously had glass railings but have been revised to have black picket style railings to provide added detailing to the exterior. 4. Precast panels now have lighter colored columns which provide greater architectural interest in the precast columns. (red box) 595 Page 10 of 12 East Elevation 1. Shift in color palette and specifically the brick colors but also the fiber cement panels that are located in the center of the elevation. 2. The balconies previously had glass railings but have been revised to have black picket style railings to provide added detailing to the exterior. 3. The columns along the first floor now terminate at the top of the windowpane area with a heavier cornice/roof line which give the first floor area greater prominence. (orange box). 4. Precast panels now have lighter colored columns which provide greater architectural interest in the precast columns. (red box) 596 Page 11 of 12 Parking Considerations During their meeting on March 11th, the City Council shared concerns regarding the amount of parking available to the project and whether or not the parking demand generated by the proposed project would result in parking spaces on adjacent private properties being used. The following is a summary of the parking analysis and the revisions to the project as it relates to parking since the City Council meeting on March 11th. Parking Supply - As of March 11th, the project had a total of 519 parking spaces including all surface parking and structured parking. From that 519 total, 396 spaces were dedicated residential parking spaces which amounted to 1.3 parking spaces per residential unit and 0.8 parking spaces per bedroom. Through revisions to the site plan that added parking spaces and changes to parking easements, the project now has a total of 575 parking spaces of which, 457 spaces are dedicated residential parking spaces which amounts to 1.5 parking spaces per residential unit and 0.95 parking spaces per bedroom. Separate from the residential parking, the plans provide for 118 parking spaces for the general public to utilize when trying to patronize the various commercial spaces. 64 of the 118 general public parking spaces are structured spaces which is a great public amenity year round but especially during the winter months. Typically commercial spaces require 4 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of leasable commercial space which is based on both city code and the independent market study completed by Cornerstone Valuation services. The project proposes 14,880 square feet of commercial space which would amount to 60 parking spaces. We know that the NW corner of the west building is meant for a restaurant user which has a higher parking demand than typical commercial users however there are 58 remaining public parking spaces to accommodate restaurant demand and in the event that some of the other commercial spaces are rented by businesses which are not open later in the evening then some of their parking allocation also frees up to assist in restaurant parking demand. Parking Demand – The applicant has revised 5 of the units in the west building which had previously been planned to be 2 bedroom units to being 1 bedroom plus den units, dropping the total number of bedrooms in the project by 5. Staff noted in our review that the applicant should add a bike rack to the project to make it more convenient for those who elect to bike into downtown and patronize the area. The site plan has been updated to add a bike rack adjacent to the west building and a bike rack adjacent to the east building. 597 Page 12 of 12 598