01-21-25 PC itemPlanning Commission Item
January 21, 2025
Item Consider a Variance for 9119 Lake Riley Blvd (Planning Case #24-21)
File No.24-21 Item No: B.1
Agenda Section PUBLIC HEARINGS
Prepared By Rachel Jeske, Planner
Applicant Applicant: Thompson Construction, LLC
Owner: Joan E Joyce Trust
Present Zoning Single Family Residential District (RSF)
Land Use Residential Low Density
Acerage 0.34
Density
Applicable
Regulations
Chapter 20, Division 3, Variances.
Chapter 20, Article 20-VII, Shoreland Management District
Chapter 20, Article 20-XII, “RSF” Single-Family Residential District
SUGGESTED ACTION
“The Chanhassen Planning Commission, activing as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments
approves the requested front yard setback variance for the expansion of a garage at 9119 Lake Riley
Blvd subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision.”
SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 20-615 Lot Requirements and Setbacks for the
Residential Single Family zoning district, which requires that all structures are setback a minimum of
30 feet from front property lines. The applicant is proposing a garage expansion that encroaches
approximately 2.8 feet into the front yard setback.
2
BACKGROUND
The property is located on the west side of Lake Riley. The zoning district is Residential Single-Family
with a minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet. This subject property is 14,799 square feet in size (0.34
acres). The property is a lawful nonconforming lot that was created prior to the establishment of the
current RSF zoning standards. The property was platted in 1951 making it eligible for up to 30%
impervious lot cover. As a result of the project, the applicant would be rebuilding the stairs for their
deck and driveway to be outside of the bluff setback as well as an overall reduction in the impervious
coverage on the property from 35.6% to 31.9%. The lot coverage of 35.6% is lawful nonconforming
and while the new lot coverage would still be in excess of the limit if the property was established
today, the project does bring the property much closer to conformance and a reduction in the lawful
nonconforming amount. A second variance related to impervious coverage is not required due to the
existing lawful nonconforming status of the 35.6% lot cover.
DISCUSSION
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the variance as presented.
ATTACHMENTS
Application
Written Description & Justification
Existing Survey
Proposed Survey
Staff Report
Findings of Fact
Affidavit of Mailing 24-21
3
4
5
December 20, 2024
Variance Application Supplement – 9119 Lake Riley Blvd
Legal Description:
Section 24 Township 116 range 023 Subdivision SHORE ACRES Lot 011 SubdivisionCd
25795 & Lot 12
(5) Written description of variance request.
We are requesting approval to build an addition on to the existing residence that will be partially
constructed into the front yard setback. This garage addition would protrude 2.8 feet at the most
into the front yard setback.
We are complying with all other setbacks as part of this project which includes moving and
rebuilding deck stairs to be within the lakeside and South side setbacks. Also the proposed new
front porch meets code and will not protrude more than 3 feet into the setback per code.
Current impervious lot coverage is 35.6%. With the proposed improvements to the
property the total coverage would be 31.9%. Thereby decreasing the overall
impervious coverage by 3.7%. This would bring impervious coverage much closer to
the current code of 30%.
(6) Written justification of how request complies with the findings for granting a variance
(pursuant to Section 20-58) as follows:
a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive
plan.
The proposed addition use is an acceptable purpose and consistent with the comprehensive
plan.
b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance.
"Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that
the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted
by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to
direct sunlight for solar energy systems.
The existing garage does not have access to the house. Currently, you need to walk around
outside to the front door to get into the house which is unsafe in winter with ice and snow and
increasingly more as the owners age in place as time goes on. The garage is also tight with the
two vehicles. The space is needed to get a door in the garage which connects to the new
mudroom.
c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone.
Economic factors are not a consideration of this request.
d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created
by the landowner.
The lack of garage to house access and depth is unique to the existing house design and was
not created by the landowner.
e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. 6
The addition & project will have no negative impact on the character of the property. In fact it will
tremendously improve the curb appeal by adding charm & value to the neighborhood also look
nice at the lakeside for boat traffic.
f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota
Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter.
This addition does not qualify as earth sheltered.
7
8
9
Project: Front Setback Variance Request (Planning Case 2024-21)
Planning Commission Review Date: January 21, 2025
60 Day Action Deadline: February 18th, 2025
Drafted By: Rachel Jeske, Planner
Staff Report Date: January 8, 2025
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 20-615 Lot Requirements and Setbacks for
the Residential Single Family zoning district, which requires that all structures are setback a
minimum of 30 feet from front property lines. The applicant is proposing a garage expansion
that encroaches approximately 2 feet into the front yard setback.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the requested variance.
PROPOSED MOTIONS:
“The Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, approves
the requested front yard setback variance for the expansion of a garage at 9119 Lake Riley Blvd
subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision.”
10
9119 Lake Riley Blvd
January 8, 2025
Page 2 of 5
LOCATION: 9119 Lake Riley
Blvd, Chanhassen,
MN 55317 (Subject
Property)
APPLICANT: Thompson
Construction, LLC
OWNER: Joan E Joyce Trust
CURRENT ZONING: Residential Single-
Family (RSF)
2040 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density
ACREAGE: 0.34 Acres
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The city’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether the proposed
project meets the standards in the zoning ordinance for a variance. The city has a moderate
level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established
standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 20, Division 3, Variances.
Chapter 20, Article 20-VII, Shoreland Management District
Chapter 20, Article 20-XII, “RSF” Single-Family Residential District
BACKGROUND
The property is located on the west side of Lake Riley. It is a part of the Shore Acres plat, which
was platted in 1951.
ZONING OVERVIEW
Section 20-615 Lot Requirements and Setbacks for the Residential Single Family (RSF) zoning
district requires that all structures are setback a minimum of 30 feet from the front and rear
11
9119 Lake Riley Blvd
January 8, 2025
Page 3 of 5
yards and 10 feet from side yards. Below is a table that displays the existing and proposed
conditions of the subject property against the RSF zoning district lot requirements.
RSF Existing Proposed
Min Lot Area 15,000 s.f. 14,799 s.f. 14,799 s.f.
Hardcover Max 30% 35.6%* 31.9%
Min Lot Width 90 ft 96.4 ft 96.4 ft
Min Lot Depth 125 ft 158 ft 158 ft
Min Front Setback 30 ft 30 ft 27.2 ft
Side Setback
(north) 10 ft 15.2 ft 15.2 ft
Side Setback
(south) 10 ft 20.8 ft 20.8 ft
Min Rear Setback 30 ft Home: 74.5 ft Home: 74.5 ft
Min Bluff Setback 30 ft Driveway: 2 ft
Deck: 14 ft
Driveway: 32.5 ft
Deck: 17 ft
*Lawful nonconforming status
The Subject Property is deficient in lot area as the property was established with a plat in 1951
which predates the current RSF zoning district and as a result is a lawful nonconforming lot. This
is one of the city’s oldest neighborhoods and it has seen a substantial amount of turnover in
housing stock leading to a blend of architectural styles. All the properties in this plat are
substandard lots or are the product of the combination of substandard lots.
The property has other existing nonconformities such as the hardcover, side yard setbacks for
the driveway, and bluff setbacks for the driveway and deck. The applicant is proposing to
decrease the hardcover and bluff setback nonconformances as a part of this project.
ANALYSIS
1. “Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of this chapter and when the variances are consistent with the
comprehensive plan.”
The requested variance fulfills the intent of the chapter as the proposed use of a two
stall garage is a reasonable proposed use for the property with a single-family home and
the garages’ minimal encroachment is found to be consistent with the comprehensive
plan.
12
9119 Lake Riley Blvd
January 8, 2025
Page 4 of 5
2. “When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical
difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the
property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by
this chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to
direct sunlight for solar energy systems.”
The property owner proposes to expand a garage to allow for an interior door between
the house and the garage, which is a reasonable use of the property. The proposed two
stall garage is also a reasonable proposal and can only expanded towards the front lot
line due to the unique construction and age of the home.
3. “That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone.”
The proposed variance is not based on economic considerations alone and is part of an
improvement that will allow the residents to age in place.
4. “The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created
by the landowner.”
The plight of the landowner is created by the age and substandard size of the lot as well
as the age and unique construction of the home.
5. “The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.”
The applicant has proposed a minimal expansion that is unlikely to be noticed from the
right-of-way. The applicant is also proposing exterior renovations to the property that
will improve the character of the home. This is one of the city’s oldest neighborhoods
and it has seen a substantial amount of turnover in housing stock leading to a blend of
architectural styles, which therefore will not alter the character of the neighborhood.
6. “Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in M.S. §
216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter.”
The proposed garage is not an earth-sheltered construction and therefore this statement
is not applicable.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion and the adoption
of the attached findings of fact and action.
13
9119 Lake Riley Blvd
January 8, 2025
Page 5 of 5
“The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves the requested front yard setback
variance for the expansion of a garage at 9119 Lake Riley Blvd subject to the conditions of
approval and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision.”
STAFF CONDITIONS
Planning Department
• Building plan submittal must decrease setback and hardcover nonconformities
consistently with the proposed survey.
Building Dept
• A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction.
• Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets
all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or
requirements may be required after plan review
Engineering Dept
• No conditions.
14
1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
IN RE:
Application of Thompson Construction, LLC, on behalf of the Joan E Joyce Trust (Property Owner)
for a front yard setback variance to reduce the front yard setback to approximately twenty-seven (27)
feet to allow the expansion of a garage on a property zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF)
– Planning Case 2024-21.
On January 21, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and
Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning
Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed
notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF).
2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density.
The legal description of the property is:
Section 24, Township 116, Range 023, Subdivision SHORE ACRES, Lot 11 & Lot 12 Carver
County, Minnesota.
3. Variance Findings – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the
granting of a variance:
a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and
intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Finding:
The requested variance fulfills the intent of the chapter as the proposed use of a two
stall garage is a reasonable proposed use for the property with a single-family home and
the garages’ minimal encroachment is found to be consistent with the comprehensive
plan.
b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical
difficulties" as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property
owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter.
Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for
solar energy systems.
15
2
Finding: The property owner proposes to expand a garage to allow for an interior door
between the house and the garage, which is a reasonable use of the property. The
proposed two stall garage is also a reasonable proposal and can only expanded towards
the front lot line due to the unique construction and age of the home.
c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone.
Finding: The proposed variance is not based on economic considerations alone and is
part of an improvement that will allow the residents to age in place.
d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the
landowner.
Finding: The plight of the landowner is created by the age and substandard size of the lot
as well as the age and unique construction of the home.
e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Finding: The applicant has proposed a minimal expansion that is unlikely to be noticed
from the right-of-way. The applicant is also proposing exterior renovations to the
property that will improve the character of the home. This is one of the city’s oldest
neighborhoods and it has seen a substantial amount of turnover in housing stock leading to a
blend of architectural styles, which therefore will not alter the character of the
neighborhood.
f. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes
Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter.
Finding: The proposed garage is not an earth-sheltered construction and therefore this
statement is not applicable.
4. The planning report #2024-21, dated January 8, 2025, prepared by Rachel Jeske et al, is
incorporated herein.
DECISION
The Planning Commission approves the requested for side yard setback variance, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The proposed building setbacks shall comply with the plan prepared by Thompson Construction,
LLC dated 12/19/2024.
2. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that the proposed building meets all
requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may
be required after plan review
3. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction.
16
3
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 21st day of January, 2025.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
BY:
Its: Chair
17
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COLINTY OF CARVER )
I, Jenny Potter, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on
January 10,2025, the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Chanhassen,
Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy ofthe attached notice Consider a
request for a front yard setback variance for the expansion of a garage at 9119 Lake Riley
Boulevard. Zoned Single Family Residential' Owner: Joan E Joyce Trust, Applicant:
Thompson Construction, LLC to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A"' by enclosing a
copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes
addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that
the names and addresses ofsuch owners were those appearing as such by the records ofthe
County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records.
Jenny , City Clerk
Subscribed and
this day o
swo
f)
m to before me
,\
^vh/ .\,o75
AMY K. WEIDMAN
Notary Public-Minnesota
.)
6-/\--NL
Notary Public
Jan 31,2027
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
H
18
Tax name Tax add l1 Tax add l2
ABIGAIL L LIBSACK REVOCABLE TRUST 10700 PURDEY RD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-
BRETT P CAVANAGH 9108 SUNNYVALE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
CAROLYN M REESE TRUST 9117 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
CHANHASSEN CITY PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
CHARLES E RECTOR 9107 SUNNYVALE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
DANIEL A & NICOLE S MORK 340 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8604
DEBRA J BRYAN REV TRUST 9211 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
DELBERT R & NANCY R SMITH 9051 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8650
DOUGLAS J & LYNETTE M WHOOLEY 9100 SUNNYVALE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8532
DUSTIN BRABENDER 9079 SUNNYVALE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8639
EDWARD MARKS 9111 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
ERIC G & DEBRA A RAYMOND 355 PARKLAND WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7630
ERIC PETERSON 9093 SUNNYVALE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
GREGORY L & KELLY R HASTINGS 9217 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8654
ISAAC ROBERT HAGEN 364 PARKLAND WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
JAMES & JUDY STOFFEL 291 GREENLEAF CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7631
JAMES G & KRISTI S ST MARTIN 9082 SUNNYVALE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8639
JEFFREY P JACKSON 300 SHOREVIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
JOAN E JOYCE TRUST 9119 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
JOHN G & KAREN L WEDIN 9101 SUNNYVALE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8532
JOY XIE 9131 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
JUDITH N LEWIS 9071 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8650
KATHLEEN M PETERSEN REV TRUST 9203 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
KENTARO ISHIKAWA 295 SHOREVIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
LUCAS BAME 294 SHOREVIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
MARK REMME 291 SHOREVIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
MINDY MARCHEL 321 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8604
N PETER SORENSEN 301 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8604
NICHOLAS PRONGA 9124 SUNNYVALE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
NICOLE JOYNT 9113 SUNNYVALE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8532
NORMAN C JR & KIMBERLY GRANT 9021 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8650
PETER DAVID MCINTOSH 287 GREENLEAF CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7631
19
PHILLIP J SOSNOWSKI PO BOX 490 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0490
RANDEL WEIGMAN 367 PARKLAND WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
REV TRUST AGREEMENT OF JOAN M LUDWIG 9005 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8650
RICHARD D & JOANNE S SENGER 300 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8604
RICHARD D OLIN LIV TR 9125 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8652
ROB NICHOLSON 9101 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8652
ROBERT J & KATHY J BEERY 9132 SUNNYVALE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8532
SAMBI R TEYYAGURA 9116 SUNNYVALE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
STEVEN P & SANDRA L NORDLING 281 GREENLEAF CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7631
SUNNYSLOPE HOMEOWNERS ASSN 9241 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8654
THE REDDY LIVING TRUST 320 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
TONY SHEN 9219 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8654
VAN K LEE 301 SHOREVIEW CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-
20
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Date & Time:
Tuesday, January 21, 2025 at 6:00 p.m.
This hearing may not start until later in the evening,
depending on the order of the agenda.
Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Proposal: Consider a request for a front yard setback variance
for the expansion of a garage.
Applicant: Thompson Construction, LLC
Property
Location:
9119 Lake Riley Boulevard
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
What Happens at
the Meeting:
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you
about the applicant's request and to obtain input
from the neighborhood about this project. During
the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing
through the following steps:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present plans for the project.
3. Planning Commission discusses the proposal.
4. Public hearing is opened taking comments from
the public.
5. Public hearing is closed and the Planning
Commission continues discussion on the project
prior to voting on the project.
Questions &
Comments:
To view project documents
before the meeting, please
visit the city’s proposed
development webpage:
www.chanhassenmn.gov/proposeddevelopments
Sign up to receive email updates about this or other projects. Go to
https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/i-want-to/subscribe
Date & Time:
Tuesday, January 21, 2025 at 6:00 p.m.
This hearing may not start until later in the evening,
depending on the order of the agenda.
Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Proposal: Consider a request for a front yard setback variance
for the expansion of a garage.
Applicant: Thompson Construction, LLC
Property
Location:
9119 Lake Riley Boulevard
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
What Happens
at the Meeting:
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you
about the applicant's request and to obtain input
from the neighborhood about this project. During
the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing
through the following steps:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present plans for the project.
3. Planning Commission discusses the proposal.
4. Public hearing is opened taking comments from
the public.
5. Public hearing is closed and the Planning
Commission continues discussion on the project
prior to voting on the project.
Questions &
Comments:
To view project documents
before the meeting, please
visit the city’s proposed
development webpage:
www.chanhassenmn.gov/proposeddevelopments
Sign up to receive email updates about this or other projects. Go to
https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/i-want-to/subscribe
21
Disclaimer
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used
as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city,
county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to
be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic
Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does
not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other
purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the
depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges
that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and
agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought
by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or
use of data provided.
«Tax_name»
«Tax_add_l1»
«Tax_add_l2»
Disclaimer
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used
as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city,
county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to
be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic
Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does
not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other
purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the
depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges
that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and
agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought
by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or
use of data provided.
«Next Record»«Tax_name»
«Tax_add_l1»
«Tax_add_l2»
Subject
Parcel
Subject
Parcel
22