Loading...
1 Variance 331 Deerfoot TrailPKOPOSAL: Z <1: LOCATION: APPLICANT: CITY OF BOA DATE: 6/17/97 CC DATE: CASE #: 97-6 By: Kirchoff:v STAFF Ill REPORT An eighteen (18) foot variance from the thirty (30) foot front yard setback requirement and a one (1) percent variance from the m, enty-five (25) percent maximum lot coverage requirement for the construction of a pool. 331 Deerfoot Trail (Lot 10, Block 1, Sunny Slope Addition) Robert and Laura Evans 331 Deerfoot Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 445-0565 .__& PRESENT ZONING: ACREAGE: D; ~,NSITY: PUD R, Planned Unit Development Residential Approximately 13,200 sq. ft. (.29 Acres) N/A td A~ )JACENT ZONING AND LAND USES: WATER AND SEWER: PIIYsICAL CHARACTER: 2000 LAND USE PLAN: RSF, Residential Single Family A-2, Agricultural Estate District Available to the site The site is a double frontage lot that contains an existing single-family residence. . Low Density Residential Bandimere Heights Park ~,'- PROPOSED VA~~E 7 9000 9100 9200 9300 9400 9500 9600 9700 9800 9900 10000 10100 10200 10300 10400 Evans Variance Ju.~e 17, 1997 Page 2 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Section 20-615 requires that all structures maintain a minimum of a thirty (30) foot setback from the front and rear property lines (Attachment 2). Section 20-615 states that the maximum lot coverage for all structures and paved surfaces is tWenty-five (25) percent of the total lot area. Section 20-904 states that swimming pools may be located in rear yards with a minimum side and rear setback of ten (10) feet (Attachment 3). BACKGROUND TDe subject property is located in Sunny Slope Addition. This planned unit development was approved in 1977. Of the 12 lots in this development, 6 have a double frontage, meaning, Lots 7-'_ 2 abut Lake Riley Blvd. to the south and Deerfoot Trail to the north. This PUD required a 20 foot setback along Deerfoot Trail and a 30 foot setback along Lake Riley Boulevard. The recuced setback intended to compensate for the decreased lot depth. The existing residence does meet these setback requirements. The lot has approximately 60 feet of frontage on Deerfoot Trail and 169 feet of frontage on Lake Riley Boulevard. ANALYSIS Tk,e applicant is requesting an 18 foot variance from the 30 foot front yard setback (actually the rear of the home) requirement and approximately a 1 percent variance from the 25 percent maximum lot coverage requirement to construct a pool. The 16 foot by 28 foot, kidney-shaped pc ~1 is proposed to be located south and west of the existing residence. The proposal does not include the decking or the fence. The contractor stated that typically a 3 foot decking is placed around the pool. The pool, including the decking, would bring the pool approximately 9 feet from the property line that abuts Lake Riley Boulevard. Also, City Code states that an in-ground swimming pool shall be protected by a fence with a minimum height of 5 feet. Typically, a pool is permitted in the rear yard as long as a 10 foot setback is maintained in the site and rear yard. In this case, the applicant has Lake Riley Boulevard bordering on the rear of tl~ home so the 30 foot setback must be maintained rather than the 10 foot. The majority of the proposed pool encroaches into the required setback. In addition, accessory structures are not p~mqitted in the front yard setback and technically this property has two front yards. Staff has calculated the lot coverage and found that the existing structures (house, driveway) and peol with the decking will exceed the 25 percent maximum lot coverage requirement. The residence and the driveway cover 2,728 sq. ft. of the lot and the pool area is approximately 750 Evans Variance June 17, 1997 Page 3 sq. ft. This additional impervious surface increases the hard surface coverage to 26 percent, 1 percent beyond what is permitted by ordinance. The lot area is 13,200 sq. ft. so 3,300 sq. ft. is permitted to be covered by an impervious surface. Approximately 3,475 sq. ft. of the site is proposed to be covered by a hard surface. The applicant contends that the variance is needed to provide a safe alternative for their child and for daily exercise (See Attachment 1). The reasons presented are inconsistent with the conditions for granting a variance. According to Section 20-58, a variance may be granted if the enforcement of the chapter would cause a hardship. Staff believes that the enforcement of the 30 foot setback requirement is not a hardship. The property has a reasonable use of the property as compared to those within 500 feet. A single family home with an attached garage exists on this property. The inability to construct a pool on a property is not a hardship. Many residents do not have a pool on their property and still enjoy a reasonable use. Staff has discussed this proposal in detail with the applicant prior to the submittal of this request and explained that the variance would not be recommended by staff as a hardship has not been demonstrated. Staff also explained that the pool will have to be engineered to sustain the slope in the yard. A retaining wall consisting of keystone brick, wood or boulder would be appropriate. Staff has also discussed the proposal with the contractor, Valley Pools, and made them aware that a pool is not appropriate in this yard. FINDINGS The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria. Finding: The applicants have not demonstrated a hardship that would warrant the granting of this variance. The property can and has been put to reasonable use as a single family home exists on this site. Staff surveyed Sunny Slope Addition and found that all properties have maintained the appropriate setback (decks may encroach 5 feet, so setback would be 25 feet) along Lake Riley Boulevard. The applicant has an opportunity to use and enjoy their property xvithout the pool. Approving this variance would depart from the existing standards and would create a new setback along Lake Riley Boulevard. In addition, it may Evans Variance Jure 17, 1997 Page 4 bo do allow for a proliferation of variances. When this report was written no variances were granted in this PUD. eo The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: Although, the variation does not appear to be based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the property, the applicant does have a reasonable use of the property. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: Staff believes that the hardship is entirely self-created. The applicant knew when they bought the property that it has two street frontages. The proposal itself is creating a hardship. Once again, the inability to construct a pool is not a hardship. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The granting of the variance could be detrimental to the public welfare. If the variance is approved, the applicant will be allowed to encroach further into a requirement setback that abuts a public street without a hardship. Additionally, the pool is required to have a minimum of a 5 foot high fence surrounding it and the maximum height of an open fence in the front yard is 4 feet. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair neighborhood property values. ~. Evans Variance June 17, ! 997 Page 5 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Adjustments and Appeals adopt the following motion: "The Board of Adjustments and Appeals denies the request for an 18 foot variance from the 30 foot setback requirement and the variance from the hard surface coverage requirement based upon the findings presented in the staff report and the following: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship that would warrant the granting of a variance. . The applicant has an opportunity to enjoy a reasonable use of the property without constructing a pool." If the Board of Adjustments and Appeals should grant the variance the following conditions shall apply: 1. The applicant shall have the pool engineered by a registered engineer. 2. The applicant shall provide type 1~[ erosion control. 3. The applicant shall comply swimming pool fence requirements. ATTACHMENTS 1. Application and Letter 2. Section 20-615, Lot Requirements and Setbacks 3. Section 20-904, Accessory Structures 4. Site Plan 5. Property Owners CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 937-1900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AppLICATION · TELEPHONE (Day time) OWNER: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: CITV OF MAY-3 0 1997 'CPI,.~.,..,-. ....... , ....... ~cr' I- Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cond tional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non-conforming Use Permit Pianr'~.d Unit Development* Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of ROW/Easements _~' Variance Wetland Alteration Perm it Zoning Appeal ReTJ3r ing Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign Site Plan Review* Subdiv:sion* X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** ($50 CUP/SPR/VACNARAIV AP/Metes and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB) TOTAL FEE $'~ ~,~-~,c, A list 3fall property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application. BulldOg material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. ~ ~ ~ 1 i~aWer ty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/2'' X 11" reduced copy of ns~arency for each plan sheet. · ** Esc~ow will be required for other applications through the development contract NOTE - When ~nultiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME /0 ']'{DTAL ACREAGE W~S PRESENT PRESENT ZONING YES ~ NO REQU]:STED ZONING PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION '~,.~-.L,, ": :'>' ~Q~S~D ~ND USE DESIGNATION ~,.~ ~ . B~ON FOR THIS REQUEST ~'~_~ '~ : >. ~3~/~: (:.' (> ~ ~ .... Y.%t:'.. ~:i' I:7 (;'Lf ~,::.' ' "'-(~:"(-":~r:_."' ' : ;i' I I J 7h~s application must be completed~' full'and be t~ewri~en or clearly printed and must be accompaD,ed by all information ~d plans required by applicable Ci~ Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning DeDUct to dete~ine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within J.e_,a. business days of application submittal. A written ,ne~ice Mapplication deficiencies shall-be mailed to the applicant within ten bosiness days of application. q'h]~ is to certrTy that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This applicat, ion should be processed in my name and I am the party whom · ~he City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. ! w~ keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand 'that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. The city hereby notifies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing requirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day extension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review extensions are approved by theapplicant. Signature o~A~.Plicant .>>'<-: ~'' .... ' Date Signature of Fee Owner ApDl~cation Rece]ved on ~/~.3/~---~U Fee Paid Date The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting. if not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. 28, 1997 C~T¥ OF CHANH,a ~q~.~N 1~': "~.\; ~ :-', IVlAY' $ 0 1997 :, Dear Sirs and Madams of City Council: I, Laura Evans, of sound mind, am in need of a formal variance. I need a footage easement to be lessened on our property of ten feet by the City, so that we will be able to properly place and con.qruct an area for a pool. The pool will provide physical exercise to be performed daily (weather permitting), to alleviate anxiety and stress which I am under medical care for. Also, I mum provide a safe physical routine for our daughter because of her A.D.H.D. condition. Three- out-of-three persons in this household either, because of mental conditions, laborious daily duties of work, a strive for excellence and in the nature of "providing for" our family would benefit. Our lives are a~365 day~ year around battle to live co-existingly with all our surroundings and habi-at. Thirdly, I also take care of mentally retarded persons who are in need of daily exercise and privacy. During the months of May, June, July, August and September, my stress and anxiety leve'_s will be drastically reduced. For other reasons extremely private to me, I cannot swim in pubEc pools and/or recreational lakes. As Rob and I are living here now, we plan to stay to see through to our daughters education/special needs. The yard parcel part of the property becomes totally useless. I vo_~hmteer and work at our Carver County Schools. We are very loving and caring people, we nee° this variance to go through for the health and future of myself, as well as, our daughter's futu~eo We will provide the most spectacular landscape available to us, around the pool area, which will enhmce the beauty of our beautiful Lake Riley neighborhood. I w ~o~ld like to thank you for your precious time and physical energy given to hear this plea for help and accept the understanding of our human needs. We need to "all" recognize each others "tinu in need," just as our "neighboring flood victims" prayed and hoped for our help - basic needs - and fin/~al needs to rebuild their lives. Laura ~.. Evans & Family § 20-595 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE b. For accessory structures, three (3) stories/forty (40) feet. (7) The minimum driveway separation is as follows: a. If the driveway is on a collector street, four hundred (400) feet. b. If the driveway is on an arterial street, one thousand two hundred fif~ (1,250) feet. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 4(5-4-5), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 127, § 2, 3-26-90; Ord. No. 170, § 2, 6-8-92; Ord. No. 194, § 2, 10-11-93) Sec. 20-596. Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "RR" District: (1) Commercial kennels and stables. (Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90) Editor's note--Inasmuch as there exists a § 20-595, the provisions added by § 3 of Ord. No. 120 as § 20-595 have been redesignated as § 20-596. Secs. 20-597--20-610. Reserved. ARTICI,E XII. '~SF" SINGI,E.FAMIIX RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 20-611. Intent. The intent of the "RSF" District is to provide for single-family residential subdivisions. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-1), 12-15-86) Sec. 20-612. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in an "RSF" District: (1) Single-family dwellings. (2) Public and private open space. (3) State-hcensed day care center for twelve (12) or fewer children. (4) State-licensed group home serving six (6) or fewer persons. (5) Utility services. (6) Temporary real estate office and model home. (7) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-2), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 259, § 11, 11-12-96) Sec. 20-613. Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in an "RSF" District: (1) Garage. Supp. No. 9 1210 ZONING § 20-615 (2) Storage building. (3) Swimming pool. (4) Tennis court. (5) Signs. (6) Home occupations. (7) One (1) dock. (8) Private kennel. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-3), 12-15-86) Sec. 20-614. Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in an "RSF" District: (1) Churches. (2) Reserved. (3) Recreational beach lots. (4) Towers as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5.4), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 120, § 4(4), 2-12-90; Ord. No. 259, § 12, 11-12-96) State law reference~Conditional uses, M.S. § 462.3595. Sec. 20-615. Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an "RSF" District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter and chapter 18: (1) The minimum lot area is fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. For neck or flag lots, the lot area requirements shall be met after the area contained within the "neck" has been excluded from consideration. (2) The minimum lot frontage is ninety (90) feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac "bubble" or along the outside curve of curvilinear street sections shall be ninety (90) feet in width at the building setback'line. The location of this lot is conceptually Supp. No. 9 1211 § 20-615 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE illustrated below. Lots Whsre Frontlge I, Me&sured At 8etbl=k Line (3) The minimum lot depth is one hundred twenty-five (125) feet. The location of these lots is conceptually illustrated below. Lot width on neck or flag lots and lots accessed by private driveways shall be one hundred (100) feet as measured at the front building setback line. Neck / Flag Iota Fron: Lot Line ; ' I I I 100/l.ot Width ,f I I , ~, -.-J I I I I ~' "~' I I I I I z. _ L._._I_ ..j (4) The maximum lot coverage for all structures and paved surfaces is twenty-five (25) percent. (5) The setbacks are as follows: a. For front yards, tkirty (30) feet. b. For rear yards, thirty (30) feet. Supp. No. 9 1212 ZONING § 20-632 (6) c. For side yards, ten (10) feet. The setbacks for lots served by private driveways and/or neck lots are as follows: a. For front yard, thirty (30) feet. The front yard shall be the lot line nearest the public right-of-way that provides access to the parcel. The rear yard lot line is to be located opposite from the front lot line with the remaining exposures treated as side lot lines. On neck lots the front yard setback shall be measured at the point nearest the front lot line' where the lot achieves a one-hundred-foot minimum width. b. For rear yards, thirty (30) feet. c. For side yards, ten (10) feet. (7) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, three (3) stories/forty (40) feet. b. For accessory structures, twenty (20) feet. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-5), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 90, § 1, 3-14-88; Ord. No. 127, § 3, 3-26-90; Ord. No. 145, § 2, 4-8-91; Ord. No. 240, § 18, 7-24-95) Editor's note~Section 2 of Ord. No. 145 purported to amend § 20-615(6)b. pertaining to accessory structures; such provision were contained in § 20-615(7)b., subsequent to amend- ment of the section by Ord. No. 127. Hence, the provisions of Ord. No. 145, § 2, were included as amending § 20-615(7)b. Sec. 20-616. Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "RSF" District: (1) Private stables subject to provisions of chapter 5, article IV. (2) Commercial stables with a minimum lot size of five (5) acres. (Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90) Secs. 20-617--20-630. Reserved. ARTICLE ~ITI. "R4" MIXED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Sec. 20-631. Intent. The intent of the "R-4" District is to provide for single-family and attached residential development at a maximum net density of four (4) dwelling units per acre. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 6(5-6-1), 12-15-86) Sec. 20-632. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in an "R-4" District: (1) Single-family dwellings. -. (2) Two-family dwellings. Supp. No. 9 1213 ZONING § 20-904 (2) Concrete mixing plants. (Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90) Secs. 20.817--20.900. Reserved. ARTICLE XXIII. GENERAL SUPPLEMENTAL REGUI~TIONS DMSION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 20-901. Overhead transmission lines. Installation of overhead transmission lines in excess of sixty-nine (69) kilovolts shall require the issuance of a conditional use permit through any district located in the city. The city council, in addition to the standards established in article IV, may also impose other conditions as deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare. (Ord. No. 80, Art. VI, § 2, 12-15-86) Sec. 20-902. Multiple principal buildings on same lot. In any single-family detached residential district not more than one (1) principal building shall be permitted to be erected on a single building lot. Groupings of buildings in other districts may only be permitted by conditional use permit. (Ord. No. 80, Art. VI, § 3, 12-15-86) Sec. 20-903. Zoning lots. (a) The designation of a zoning lot shall be approved by the city planner if it complies with the lot requirements of the district in which it is located and has a single tax identification number. (b) Interior lot lines within a zoning lot shall be disregarded in applying setbacks and other zoning ordinance standards. (c) After designation of a zoning lot the lot may not be subdivided without complying with the city's subdivision regulations. (Ord. No. 129, § 2, 6-4-90) Sec. 20-904. Accessory structures. (a) A detached accessory structure, except a dock, shall be located in the buildable lot area or required rear yard. No accessory use or structure in any residential district shall be located in any required front, side or rear setback with the following exceptions: (1) In the RSF and R-4 Districts accessory structures shall not exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet. These structures may encroach into the rear setback as follows: a. Less than one hundred forty (140) square feet, minimum rear setback is five (5) feet. Supp. No. 9 1232.7 § 20-904 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE b. One hundred forty-one (141) to three hundred ninety-nine (399) square feet, minimum rear setback is ten (10) feet. c. Four hundred (400) square feet and above, m/n/mum rear setback is thirty (30) feet. (2) On riparian lots, detached garages and storage buildings may be located in the front or rear yard but must comply with front, side and applicable ordinary high water mark setbacks and may not occupy more than thirty (30) percent of the yard in which it is built. (3) Tennis courts and swimming pools may be located in rear yards with a minimum side and rear yard setback of ten (10) feet, [but] however, must comply with applicable ordinary high water mark setbacks. (b) A detached accessory structure may occupy not more than thirty (30) percent of the area of any rear yard. (c) For parcels with less than three (3) acres in any residential or agricultural district, no accessory structure or use shall be erected, constructed, or commenced prior to the erection, construction, or commencement of the principal permitted structure or use, but may be erected or commenced simultaneously. If the principal structure or use is subsequently removed, destroyed, or discontinued, the accessory structure or use must be removed or discontinued within twelve (12) months. (Ord. No. 80, Art. VI, § 5, 12-15-86; Ord. No. 145, § 1, 4-8-91; Ord. No. 215, § 1, 8-8-94) Sec. 20-905. Single-family dwellings. All single-family detached homes shall: (1) Be constructed upon a continuous perimeter foundation that meets the requirements of the state building code. (2) Conform to the following standards for living areas: a. If a one-story rambler design, have an area of nine hundred sixty (960) square feet. b. If a split level design, have an area of one thousand fif~ (1,050) square feet. c. Ifa split foyer and two-story design, have an area of six hundred (600) square feet on the first floor. d. A two-car garage must be provided with the single-family structure. (3) Have an earth covered, composition, shingled or tiled roof or other materials approved by the Uniform Building Code as adopted and amended by the city. (4) Receive a building permit. The application for a building permit in addition to other information required shall indicate the height, size, design and the appearance of all elevations of the proposed building and a description of the construction materials proposed to be used. Supp. No. 9 1232.8 VALLEy POOLS iViAY 8 0 1997 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS TUESDAY, JUNE 17, 1997 at 6:00 p.m. City Hall - 690 Coulter Drive Council Chambers SUBJECT: Rear Yard Setback Variance for Construction of a Pool APPLICANT: Laura Evans LOCATION: 331 Deerfoot Trail I I Lake Riley NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicant, Laura Evans, is requesting an 18 foot variance to the 30 foot rear yard setback to allow the construction of a pool on property zoned RSF and located at 331 Deerfoot Trail. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Commission Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The Developer will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. The commission will then make a recommendation to the City Council. Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Cindy at 937-1900 ext. 117. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. -. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on June 5, 1997. ROBERT & DORIS ROGERS 4917 DIANE DR~ :TONKA, M~ 55343 DENNIS R & ANN BAKER 9219 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, ~N 55317 LUCILLE LOUISE REMI3S 9245 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, ~IN 55317 DONALD ~ KATH~yN SITTER 9249 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, ~ 55317 EUNICE ELIZABETH KOTTKE 9221 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 JEFFREY P & HEIDI S NELSON 300 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 PETER PEMRICK~JR & WENDY L EGGERS 9251 KIOWA TRL CHANHASSEN, M~ 55317 ALAN & KAREN DIRKS 331 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 ROBERT D & KRISTIN S REBERTUS 320 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 JA/~IES F & PAT~ICIA M DOLEJSI 9260 KIOWA TRL CHANHASSEN, FL~ 55317 GEORGE B DEWITT 3127 4TH ST SE MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55414 PAMELA N GUYER 340 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 /~iCHAEL & CRYBTAL SCHACHTERLE 6350 DOGWOOD AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 RONALD YTZEN 9227 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 DANIEL M & JEAN CHRISTENSEN 360 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 JAMES LEE HENDR~CKSON 9131 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, PiN 55317 FREDERICK POTTHOFF III & JUDITH C POTTHOFF 9231 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 KEVIN M & LINDA P SHARKEY 380 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 AL, AN H & KAR~N L DIRKS 9203 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHASIHASSEN, ~ 55317 LELAND G SAPP & DIANE K TAYLOR C/O CERIDIAN EMPIZDYER SERVICES 5354 PARKDALE DR #200 MINNEAPOLIS, _~N 55416 JOHN W ARDOYNO 9235 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 PAUL KENT OLSON 9239 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 PAUL E & GAIL A TERRY 400 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 RICHARD R & JILL M MADORE 381 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, PIN 55317 CURTIS G kq~I~R 9211 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, 5~N 55317 SUNNYSLOPE HOMEOWNERS ASSN C/O LESLIE TIDSTROM 340 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 SCOTT ALAN WIRTH 361 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 L & I~ELLY R HASTINGS 9217 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, ~ 55317 JOY A TANNER 9243 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 STEVEN A & PATRICIA A SEKELY 341 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, M~ 55317 CHRISTOPHER T MCGRATH & CHRISTINE M MCGRATH 5829 OLINGER RD .. EDINA~ MN 55436 KENT TAGE RAMLIDEN & NAOMI KAHN-RAMLIDEN 321 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, PIN 55317 DALE B & DIANE KUTTER 301 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 SUNNYSLOPE HOMEO~ERS ASSN C/O LESLIE TIDSTROM 340 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, ~ 55317 DALE L & RANDI E BOYER 9005 LAKE RILEY BLVD Pi~ 55317 BENJAlVfIN E & ~ATRICIA SWENSON 9015 LAKE RILEY RD CHANPLASSEN, ~ 55317 NORMAN C JR & KIMBERLY GRANT 9021 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANFLASSEN, PLW 55317 STEVEN A & RENEE WILLIAMS 7600 HERITAGE RD EDEN PRAIRIE, MI~ 55346 SCOTT A & SUSAN M BABCOCK 8570 MAGNOLIA TRL-APT 112 EDEN PRAIRIE, MI~ 55344 PETER C & GEORGE-ANN LILLIE 9355 KIOWA TRL CHANHASSEN, MI~ 55317 DAVID P & KAREN L DAOUST 9470 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 RICHARD A & JOANNE M LAMETTRY 9490 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 DENNIS M MILLS 9510 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 ELDON & RAE J~ BERKLAND 9261 KIOWA TRL C_~LANHASSEN, /vLW 55317 RICHARD C BLUMENSTEIN & JILL KEOUGH-BLUMENSTEIN 9361 KIOWA TRL CHANHASSEN, MI~ 55317 RICHARD J CHADWICK 9530 FOXFORD RD CHANH SSEN, Mlq 55317 DONALD & KATH~YN SITTER 9249 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, FiW 55317 JOHN W & BEVERLY J BELL 9371 KIOWA TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 LAKE RILEY WOODS HOMEOWNERS 1660 HWY 100 S SUITE 428 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 BARRY A & HARRIET F BERSHAW 9271 KIOWA TRL CHANHASSEN, F~N 55317 MARK A & PAMELA K MOKSNES 9381 KIOWA TRL CHANHASSEN, M~ 55317 DAVID O HANSEN 108 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 PETER PEMRICK JR & WENDY L EGGERS 9251 KIOWA TRL CHANFLASSEN, lvLN 55317 JOYCE E KING 9391 KIOWA TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 WILLIAM T & CAROL ANN GRAY 50 PIONEER TRL CHANFLASSEN, MN 55317 ~ILLIAM J o'lq~ILL 9550 FOXFORD RD CHANHASSEN, /~N 55317 WILLIAM L & LINDA C JANSEN 240 EASTWOOD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 STEPHEN L WHITEHILL 7001 DAKOTA AVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 CRAIG W ~ KATS{RYI~ HALVERSON 9283 KIOWA TRL CHANHASSEN, /~N 55317 WILLIAM S HENAK & KRISTIN ALLERS 280 EASTWOOD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 MICHAEL & CRYSTAL SCHACHTERLE 6350 DOGWOOD AVE EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 CRAIG W ~ KAT~{RYNHALVERSON 9283 KIOWA TRL CHANKASSEN, /~q 55317 WILLIAM S HENAK & KRISTIN ALLERS 280 EASTWOOD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 STEVEN F & KATHLEEN M BURKE 9591 MEADOWLARK LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 WILLIAM & SHARON PREDOVICH 9611 MEADOWLARK LN CHANHASSEN, M/q 55317 RICHARD D & FRIEDA A OLIN 9125 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MI~ 55317 RONALD YTZEN 9227 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 RICHARD P VOGEL 105 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN, PIN 55317 MICHAEL T & TERESA A MONK 9671 MEADOW LARK LN CHANHASSEN, PIN 55317 JAMES LEE HENDRICKSON 9131 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, M/~ 55317 ALAN H & KAREN L DIRKS 9203 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 FREDERICK POTTHOFF III & JUDITH C POTTHOFF 9231 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 JOHN W ARDOYNO 9235 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 MICHAEL J & LISA A REILLY 2305 INDIAN RIDGE DR GLENVIEW, IL 60025 LELAND G SAPP & DIANE K TAYLOR C/O CERIDIAN EMPLOYER SERVICES 5354 PARK]DALE DR #200 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 PAUL KENT OLSON 9239 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 DELBERT R & NANCY R SMITH 9051 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 CURTIS G KRIER 9211 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 SUNNYSLOPE HOMEOWNERS ASSN C/O LESI TIDSTROM 340 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 RAYMOND M & JUDITH N LEWIS 9071 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 GREGORY L & KELLY R HASTINGS 9217 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 JOY A TANNER 9243 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 ROBERT H & CHERYL A PETERSON 9101 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, FiN 55317 DENNIS R & ANN BAKER 9219 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 LUCILLE LOUISE REMUS 9245 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 J~4ES L TONJES C/O GENERAL MILLS INC-B BARNES PO BOX 1113 MINNEAPOLIS, FIN 55440 EUNICE ELIZABETH KOTTKE 9221 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 J P 2FR & JUDITH M HUNGELMANN 9117 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 ALAN & KAREN DIRKS 331 DEERFOOT TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 JOHN B JR & M3LRLYI~ G GOULETT 9119 LAKE RILEY BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 GEORGE B DEWITT 3127 4TH ST SE MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55414