4 Variance 6735 Nez Perce Drive
CITY OF
STAFF
REPON'
BOA DATE: 5/20/97
CC DATE:
CASE #: 97-4
By: Kirchoff:v
l-
Z
I
F~ROPOSAL:
I2~CA'HON:
A~PLICANT:
i
Pi~ESENq' ZONING:
A,CREAGE:
DENSITY:
ADJACENT ZONING
AND LAND USES:
[
W?;ATER AND SEWER:
P ~I?YSICAL CHARACTER:
204)0 LAND USE PLAN:
A request for an 8.5 foot vahance fi.om the 27 1hot front yard setback for the
construction of an open porch.
6735 Nez Perce Drive
(Lots 1358-1370, Carver Beach)
Ken & Tom Lucas
6735 Nez Perce D~ve
Chanbassen. MN 55317
474-5676
RSF, Residential Single Family
Approximately ! 5,600 sq~ ft~ (.36 Acres)
N/A
RSF, Residemial Single Family
Available to the site
The site contains an existing single-family residence.
Low Density Residential
00~:
oo~:
00~ '8.?
-r~
OOfi
009
,
008
Lucas Variance
l',/ay 20, 1997
F.age 2
_
,
£ PPLICABLE REGULATIONS
~ection 20-615 of the City Code requires all structures to maintain a minimum of a thirty (30) foot
setback from the front property line (Attachment 2).
Section 20-908 of the City Code states that open porches may project three (3) feet into a required
Y~rd (Attachment 3).
S~ction 20-72 of the City Code states that nonconforming structures shall not be expanded or
r~Placed except to eliminate or lessen the nonconformity (Attachment 4).
BACKGROUND
T~e applicant is requesting an 8.5 foot variance to construct an open porch on the front of an
existing home. The residence is only 23.3 feet from the front property line and already has a
n0~nconforming front yard setback. The City Code allows an open porch to project 3 feet into a
required yard, hence, the variance from 27 foot front yard setback. The lot is 140 feet deep and 122
f~t wide.
Tt~.e Carver Beach area predates the zoning ordinance, therefore, variances have been recommended
for_ certain circumstances. The majority of the approved variance requests involve steep topography
or~ a small lot area that prohibits the owner from making a reasonable use of the property
(c~nstructing a single family home). Staff surveyed front yard setbacks in surrounding properties
an[t~ found that many do comply with the 30 foot front yard setback.
·
A~ALYSIS
Tlie applicant believes that a porch would make the residence more safe and inviting. Although
st,~ff believes that a porch will make the house look more appealing and appreciates the fact that the
aP°licants want to improve their neighborhood, this will increase the non-conformity of the
strlcture. According to the City Code, If a setback of a dwelling is nonconforming, no additions
m~y be added to the nonconforming side of the building unless the addition meets setback
reCuirements.
Tl~e~ applicant has a reasonable opportunity to construct and enjoy a deck or porch in the rear yard
th~ would comply with City ordinance. The applicant does not have a hardship. An undue
hardship means that property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical
su~oundings, shape or topography. The physical state of the property does not prohibit the
apt~licant from constructing a porch on the rear of the home.
·
:
Lucas Variance
May 20, 1997
Page 3
FINDINGS
The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a
variance unless they find the following facts:
a,
bo
c~
d,
That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause undue hardship. Undue hardship
means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical
surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of
comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a
proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this
neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing
downward from them meet this criteria.
Finding: Staff believes that the applicant does not have a hardship. The applicant has a
reasonable opportunity to construct a deck or a porch on the rear of the home. In addition,
granting a variance would increase the non-conformity of this structure. Although
nonconforming structures and lots exist in the Carver Beach area, this particular property
could accommodate a deck or a porch in an alternative location and still comply with the
setback requirements. Staff recognizes that there are pre-existing standards in this area,
however, the majority of the homes within 500 feet meet the required 30 foot setback.
The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to
other property within the same zoning classification.
Finding: The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable,
generally, to other property within the same zoning classification.
The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income
potential of the parcel of land.
Finding: The purpose of the variation does not appear to be based upon a desire to increase
the value or income potential of the parcel of land.
The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship.
Finding: Staff does not believe that the applicant is responsible for the location of the
home, because they were not the original owners. However, they were aware of the home
location prior to purchase. The applicants are creating a hardship by requesting to expand
on the nonconforming side of the residence when they have other options.
r.;ucas Variance
~4ay 20, 1997
~age 4
The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located.
Finding: The granting of the variance could be detrimental to the public welfare. If the
variance is approved, it will allow a structure to be expanded even further in the direction of
a public street. Staff has concerns with the distance the porch will be from Nez Perce
Drive.
The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger
of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values
within the neighborhood.
Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase
the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property
values within the neighborhood.
~COMMENDATION
S~ffrecommends that the Board of Adjustments and Appeals adopt the following motion:
"The Board of Adjustments and Appeals recommends the denial of an 8.5 foot variance based upon
the findings presented in the staff report and the following:
.
The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship that would warrant the granting of a
variance.
The applicant has a reasonable opportunity to construct a deck or porch in an alternative
location."
AX TACHMENTS
1. [ Applicant's Letter and Application
2. i Section 20-615, Lot requirements and setbacks
3. i Section 20-908, Yard regulations
4. ~ Section 20-72, Nonconforming Uses and Structures
5. i Site Plan
6. iProperty Owners
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
(612) 937-1900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
CITY OF CHANHAe.~=,,,
APR 18 !997
CHANHA~,~
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE (Day time)
· Comprehensive Plan Amendment
OWNER'
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE: ,_.Co,
Temporary Sales Permit
Conditional Use Permit
Vacation of ROW/Easements
Interim Use Permit
Variance
Non-conforming Use Permit
Wetland Alteration Permit
Planned Unit Development*
Zoning Appeal
. Rezoning
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Sign Permits
Sign Plan Review
Notification Sign
Site Plan Review* X
Subdivision*
Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost**
($50 CUPISPRNACIVARIW APIMetes
and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB)
TOTAL FEE $
A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the
application.
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews.
"Twenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/2'' X 11" reduced copy of
transparency for each plan sheet.
'* Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract
NOTE - When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
r
PROJEC~NAME
.C i-ver
LEGAL DF:CSCRIPTION
·
TOTted_ A~IF_-AG E
WETLANi~S PRESENT
PRESENT ZONING ~
REQUESTED ZONING
PRESENT _AND USE DESIGNATION
REQUEST_~D l-AND USE DESIGNATION
REASON F~R THIS REQUEST /'-'"~
/ ,~ f,. o 1.3 ~,1 12C z
./
YES
~ NO
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans r,,quired by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning
Departmen~to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
i~lietermin~ion of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written
ce of apglication deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application.
Thi~ is to cE'tify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
all City requ_-rements with regard to this request. This applicat, ion should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
1he City shOUld contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either
copy of Owr, er's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make
this applicat'~n and the fee owner has also signed this application.
I will keep .myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
understand -.hat additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorizatior to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge.
The city he.by notifies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing
requirement~ and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day
extension fdr development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review
extensions ?e approveG]by_y_y~e applicant.
Signature of _Applicant Date
Signature of --ce Owner Date
)lication Peceived on ~1 I i(~L-~ Iq~/.~ Fee Paid(I~ r~. O0 Receipt No.
e applica tt should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting.
If not contaC'ted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address.
,
To the Chanhassen Planning Commission:
April 15, 1997
Variance Requested
Ken and Toni Lucas wish to build an open porch entryway on the front
(west side) of their home at 6735 Nez Perce Drive. Currently, there is a 4' 4"x 4'
4" x 6" loose concrete slab acting as the door stoop. We want to make the
entrance safe and inviting and usable. The front entrance door has not been
used as the primary entry since we purchased the house in 1990 because it is
unsafe, tminviting, and difficult to determine it is the main front door. The
alternate breezeway door has been the entry into the house that people are
drawn to.
In addition, rain comes through the screen door and the best way to
eliminate this is to build a structure over it.
We love this area and have been saving money to improve our house so it
is an asset to the neighborhood. Many neighbors walk Nez Perce Drive in
spring and summer--others year round. We refer to it as the "parade going by,"
and we enjoy it immensely. Our dream is to sit on our front porch one day and
enjoy the sunset and invite passersby to a little old-fashioned neighborly
conversation. We see it as a step to opening lines of communication with our
neighbors. It is said that getting to know each other is one of the criteria for safe
neighborhoods.
Toni belongs to a garden club and wants to plant flowers in a beautiful
landscape setting for all to enjoy. She's been holding back pending the
completion of our porch.
The entry is planned to extend toward the street by eight feet at the
northern end and six feet at the doorway itself. This would make it 19'9" from
the property line at the northern end and 18'6" at the southern corner of the
porch. No neighbors' properties would be encroached upon in any way. Our
plan will not endanger the public safety or increase the danger of fire or
congestion in the area.
We respectfully request a variance of 5'6" to build an entryway to our
home. Attached is a copy of the architect's plan and a drawing of how the house
is aligned with Nez Perce Drive.
Attached also is the required list of property owners within 500' of our
property lines.
Sincerely,
Ken and Toni Lucas
ZONING § 20-613
Sec. 20-596. Interim uses.
The following are interim uses in the RI{" District:
(1) Commercial kennels and stables.
(Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90)
Editor's note-Inasmuch as there exists a § 20-595, the provisions added by § 3 of Ord.
No. 120 as § 20-595 have been redesignated as § 20-596.
Secs. 20-597--20-610. Reserved.
ARTICI.E XII. '~tSF' SING!,E.F~.Y RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Sec. 20-611. Intent.
The intent of the "RSF" District is to provide for single-family residential subdivisions.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-1), 12-15-86)
Sec. 20-612. Permitted uses.
The following uses are permitted in an "RSF" District:
(1) Single-family dwellings.
(2) Public and private open space.
(3) State-licensed day care center for twelve (12) or fewer children.
(4) State-licensed group home serving six (6) or fewer persons.
(5) Utility services.
(6) Temporary real estate office and model home.
i(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-2), 12-15-86)
iSec. 20-613. Permitted accessory uses.
The following are permitted accessory uses in an "RSF" District:
(1) Garage.
(2) Storage building.
(3) Swimming pool.
(4) Tennis court.
.~ (5) Signs.
(6) Home occupations.
i (7) One (1) dock.
~ (8) Private kennel.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-3), 12-15-86)
S~pp. No. 8
1209
§ 20-614
CHANHASSEN CITY CODE
Sec. 20-614. Conditional uses.
The following are conditional uses in an "RSF" District:
(1) Churches.
(2) Reserved.
(3) Recreational beach lots.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5.4), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 120, § 4(4), 2-12-90)
State law reference-Conditional uses, M.S. § 462.3595.
Sec. 20-615. Lot requirements and setbacks.
The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an "RSF" District subject to
additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter and chapter 18:
·
(1) The minimum lot area is fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. For neck or flag lots,
the lot area requirements shall be met after the area contained within the "neck" has
been excluded from consideration.
(2) The minimum lot frontage is ninety (90) feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sa'c
"bubble" or along the outside curve of curvilinear street sections shall be ninety (90)
feet in width at the building setback line. The location of this lot is conceptually
illustrated below.
Measured At Setb ok Line
(3) The minimum lot depth is one hundred twenty-five (125) feet. The location of these
lots is conceptually illustrated below. Lot width on neck or flag lots and lots accessed
· by private driveways shall be one hundred (100) feet as measured at the front building
Supp. No. 8 1210
ZONING
§ 20-615
setback line.
. #eck / Flag Iota
Lot Ll e
lO0/Lot
I I I
Width -I I I I
I I
I '1 I
I I I I
a_ L._._I__J
(4) The maximum lot coverage for all structures and paved surfaces is twenty-five (25)
percent.
(5) The setbacks are as follows:
a. For front yards, thirty (30) feet.
b. For rear yards, thirty (30) feet.
c. For side yards, ten (10) feet.
(6) The setbacks for lots served by private driveways and/or neck lots are as follows:
i . a. For front yard, thirty (30) feet. The front yard shall be the lot line nearest the
~ public right-of-way that provides access to the parcel. The rear yard lot line is to
~ be located opposite from the front lot line with the remaining exposures treated
~ as side lot lines. On neck lots the front yard setback shall be measured at the
! point nearest the front lot line where the lot achieves a one-hundred-foot
~- minimum width.
:
, b. For rear yards, thirty (30) feet.
:
· c. For side yards, ten (10) feet.
i (7) The maximum height is as follows:
I a. For the principal structure, three (3) stories/forty (40) feet.
I b. For accessory structures, twenty (20) feet.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-5), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 90, § 1, 3-14-88; Ord. No. 127, § 3, 3-26-90;
Ord. No. 145, § 2, 4-8-91; Ord. No. 240, § 18, 7-24-95)
Editor's note--Section 2 of Ord. No. 145 purported to amend § 20-615(6)b. pertaining to
~Ccessory structures; such provision were contained in § 20-615(7)b., subsequent to amend-
r~ent ofthe section by Ord. No. 127. Hence, the provisions of Ord. No. 145, § 2, were included
a~ amending § 20-615(7)b.
S~pp. No. 8
1210.1
ZONING § 20-908
increased in width or depth by an additional foot over the side and rear yards required
for the highest building otherwise permitted in the district.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. VI, § 10, 12-15-86)
Sec. 20.908. Yard regulations.
The following requirements qualify or supplement district regulations. Yard measure-
ments shall be taken from the nearest point of the wall of a building to the lot line in question,
subject to the following qualifications:
(1) Every part of a required yard or court shall be open and unobstructed.
(2) A yard, court, or other open space of one (1) building used to comply with the provi-
sions of this chapter shall not again be used as a yard, court, or other open space for
another building.
(3) Except as provided in the business, industrial, and office districts, the front yard
setback requirements shall be observed on each street side of a corner lot; provided,
however, that the remaining two (2) yards will meet the side yard setbacks.
(4) On double frontage lots, the required front yard shall be provided on both streets.
Whenever possible, structures should face the existing street.
(5) The following shall not be considered to be obstructions:
a. Into any required front yard, or required side yard adjoining a side street lot line,
cornices, canopies, eaves, or other architectural features may project a distance
not exceeding two (2) feet, six (6) inches; fire escapes may project a distance not
exceeding four (4) feet, six (6) inches; an uncovered stair and necessary landings
may project a distance not to exceed six (6) feet, provided such stair and landing
shall not extend above the entrance floor of the building; bay windows, balconies,
open porches and chimneys may project a distance not exceeding three (3) feet;
unenclosed decks and patios may project a distance not exceeding five (5) feet and
shall not be located in a drainage and utility easement. Other canopies may be
permitted by conditional use permit.
b. The abovemamed features may project into any required yard adjoining an inte-
riot lot line, subject to the limitations cited above.
c. Porches that encroach into the required front yard and which were in existence
on February 19, 1987 may be enclosed or completely rebuilt in the same location
provided that any porch that is to be completely rebuilt must have at least a
ten-foot minimum front yard.
d. Subject to the setback requirements in section 20.904, the' following are per-
mitted in the rear yard: enclosed or open off-street parking spaces; accessory
structures, toolrooms, and similar buildings or structures for domestic storage.
Balconies, breezeways and open porches, unenclosed decks and patios, and one-
story bay windows may project into the rear yard a distance not to exceed five (5)
feet.
Supp. No. 6 1233
§ 20-60
CHANHASSEN CITY CODE
Sec. 20-60. Denial.
Variances may be deemed by the board of a~ustments and appeals and the council, and
such denial shall constitute a finding and determination that the conditions required for
approval do not exist.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. III, {} 1(3-1-4(6)), 12-15-86)
Secs. 20-61-20-70. Reserved.
DMSION 4. NONCONFORMING USES*
Sec. 20.71. Purpose.
The purpose of this division is:
(1) To recognize the existence of uses, lots, and structures which were lawful when
established, but which no longer meet all ordinance requirements;
(2) To prevent the enlargement, expansion, intensification, or extension of any noncon-
forrn{ng use, build{ng, or structure;
(3) To encourage the elim~ation of nonconforming uses, lots, and structures or reduce
their impact on adjacent properties.
(Ord. No. 165, § 2, 2-10-92)
Sec. 20-72. Nonconforml-g uses and structures.
(a) There shall be no expansion, intensification, replacement, structural change, or relo-
; cation of any nonconforming use or nonconforming structure except to lessen or eliminate the
:nonconformity.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, any detached single-family
'i dwelling that is on a nonconforming lot or that is a nonconforming use or structure may be
I altered, or expanded provided, however, that the nonconformity may not be increased. If a
setback of a dwelling is nonconforming, no additions may be added to the nonconforming side
of the building unless the addition meets setback requirements.
~ (c) No nonconforming use shall be resumed if normal operation of the use has been
! discontinued for a period of twelve (12) or more months. Time shall be calculated as beginning
{
I on the day following the last day in which the use was in normal operation and shall run
i continuously thereafter. Following the expiration of twelve (12) months, only land uses which
I are permitted by this ordinance shall be allowed to be established.
(
· i *Editor's note-Section 2 of Ord. No. 165, adopted Feb. 10, 1992, amended Div. 4 in its
~ entirety to read as set out in §§ 20-71-20-73. Prior to amendment, Div. 4 contained §§
~ 20-71-20-78, which pertained to similar subject matter and derived from Ord. No. 80, Art. III,
§ 5, adopted Dec. 15, 1986; and Ord. No. 163, § 1, adopted Feb. 24, 1992.
Supp. No. 4
[ - 1164
ZONING § 2O.73
(d) Full use of a nonconforming land use shall not be resumed if the amount of land or
floor area dedicated to the use is iessened or if the intensity of the use is in any manner
diminished for a period of twelve (12) or more months. Time shall be calculated as beginning
on the day following the last day in which the nonconforming land use was in full operation
and shall run continuously thereafter.' Following the expiration of' twelve (12) months, the
nonconforming land use may be used only in the manner or to the extent used during the
preceding twelve (12) months. For the purposes of this section, intensity of use shall be mea-
sured by hours of operation, traffic, noise, exterior storage, signs, odors, number of employees,
and other factors deemed relevant by the city.
(e) Maintenance and repair of nonconforming structures is permitted. Removal or destruc-
tion of a nonconforming structure to the extent of more than fifty (50) percent of its estimated
Yalue, excluding land value and as determined by the city, shall terminate the right to con-
tinue the nonconforming structure.
(f) Notwithstanding the prohibitions contained in the forgoing paragraphs of this section,
if approved by the city council a nonconforming land use may be changed to another noncon-
form{ng land use of less intensity if it is in the public interest. In all instances the applicant
has the burden of proof regarding the relative intensities of' uses.
(g) If a nonconforming land use is superseded or replaced by a permitted use, the non-
conforming status of the premises and any rights which arise under the provisions of this
section shall terminate.
(Ord. No. 165, § 2, 2-10-92)
Sec. 20-73. Nonconforml-g lots of record.
(a) No variance shall be required to reconstruct a detached single-family dwelling located
on a nonconforming lot of record or which is a nonconforming use if it is destroyed by natural
disaster so long es the replacement dwelling has a footprint which is no larger than that of the
destroyed structure and is substantially the same size in building height and floor area as the
destroyed structure. Reconstruction shall commence within two (2) years of the date of the
destruction of the original building and reasonable progress shall be made in completing the
project. A building permit shall be obtained prior to construction of the new dwelling and the
new structure shall be constructed in compliance with all other city codes and regulations.
(b) No variance shall be required to construct a detached single-family dwelling on a
nonconforming lot provided that it fronts on a public street or approved private street and
provided that the width and area measurements are at lest seventy-five (75) percent of the
mir~{rnum requirements of this chapter.
(c) Except as otherwise specifically provided for detached single-family dwellings, 'there
shall be no expansion, intensification, replacement, or structural changes of a structure on a
nonconforming lot.
(d) If two (2) or more contiguous lots are in single ownership and if all or pert of the lots
do not meet the width and area requirements of this chapter for lots in the district, the
Supp. No. 4
1165
IH=n ~ .....~'"""" ~":""'eWklNVHO
Z661, B I
Na$$¥HNVHO .-IO A..LIO
7
MEETING RESCHEDULED
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
o,.o
Tuesday, May 20, 1997
at 6:00 p.m.
8HB~CI: Front Yard Sotback
~PLIC~T: Ken and Toni Lucas
LOCATION: 6735 Nez Perce Drive
NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The
applicant, Ken and Toni Lucas, are requesting an 11.5 foot variance to the 25 foot
front yard setback to allow the construction of an open porch on property zoned RSF and
located at 6735 Nez Perce Drive (Lots 1358-1370, Carver Beach).
What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the
meeting, the Commission Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The Developer will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. The commission will then
make a recommendation to the City Council.
Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting', please stop by City.
Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Cindy at 937-1900 ext. 117. If you choose t°
submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the. department in advance of the meeting.
Staff will provide copies to the Commission.
Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on May 15, 1997.~
:-
Robert ~elson
n0 car'~er Beach Road
anhas~en, MN 55317
Jeff & l~vfarjorie Felt
895 Carv~r Beach Road
Chanhas~n, MN 55317
Brian & Carrie Determan
800 Carv :r Beach Road
Chanhass~n, MN 55317
Steven & Marie Thomas
6780 Yuma
Chanhassen, MN 55317
R. J. and Carol Moore
6839 Yunm
Chanhass~, MN 55317
Michael & Darla Huigens
6711 Nez Perce Drive
Chanhasse~, MN 55317
W. A. Schwab
950 Carver Beach Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Bob & Gloria Wiest
840 Carver Beach Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Melvin & Selma Herrmann
795 Carver Beach Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Bart Ellson
6800 Yuma
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Marty Jensen
770 Cree
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Albert & Elaine Otterdahl
6715 Nez Perce Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
John Muchow
901 Carver Beach Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Paul & Angie Wiltz
841 Carver Beach Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
K. Volk
790 Carver Beach Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Corazon Kallevig
6830 Yuma
Chanhassen, MN 55317
B. M. Johnson
6694 Nez Perce Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Andy & Ruth Borash
6725 Nez Perce Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Gary & Jaekie Hoffman
860 Hiawa:ha
Chanhasse~, MN 55317
Steve & K~'ren Vavrichek
6801 Nez fierce Drive
Chanhassei, MN 55317
Kim Murpl~y
6870 Nez [%rce Drive
ChanhasserL MN 55317
:
even & J~n Cronson
801 Cree D ~ive
Chanhassen: MN 55317
Charlie & Ann Ward
2653 Eitel Road
Chaska, MN 55318
Sharon Dobson
6850 Nez Perce Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Susan Albee
6871 Nez Perce Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Mark & Christine S0ppeland
833 Cree Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dave & Lynnell Santella
881 Western
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Wyrme Beckman
6865 Nez PerCe Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Frank & Vicki Ernst
840 Cree Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Tom Raymond
834 Cree Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
' Martha Gleason
820 Imperial
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Georgia Paynter
6852 Nez Perce Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317