J-1. Surface Water Management Plan Update0
CITY OF
CNANNASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 2271100
Fax 952 2271110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 2271180
Fax 952 2271190
Engineering
Phone 952 2271160
Fax 952 2271170
Finance
Phone 952 2271140
Fax 952 2271110
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director
FROM: Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator
DATE: January 20, 2015 b
SUBJ: Surface Water Management Plan Update
With the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District's adoption of the rules in
August of 2014, all four watershed organizations have completed their local water
management plan (LWMP) updates. Under Minnesota Statute we are required to
update our plan to be consistent with the various organization LWMPs
In anticipation of this, staff began working with Wenck Associates to update our
Surface Water Management Plan Minnesota Rules Chapter 8410 dictates what must
be included in a local water management plan. These minimum required elements
include-
1 Plan purpose,
Park & Recreation
2. Water resource management related agreements,
Phone 952 2271120
3 Land and water resource inventory,
Fax 952 2271110
4. Establishment of policies and goals,
Recreation Center
5 Assessment of problems,
2310 Coulter Boulevard
6. Corrective actions;
Phone 952 2271400
7 Financial considerations,
Fax 952 2271404
8. Implementation priorities,
Planning &
9 Implementation program, and
Natural Resources
10 Amendment procedures.
Phone 952 2271130
Fax 952 2271110
Many of these elements will remain relatively consistent with the two previous plans.
Public Works
Some of the elements, such as land and water resources inventory, are continuously
7901 Park Place
being updated as land uses change. We have recently updated our hydrologic model
Phone 952 2271300
for the entire City of Chanhassen This will be used to help identify and assess
Fax 952 2271310
problems Our next step is to begin review of the current policies and goals and
Senior Center
update as necessary Staff will meet with the Environmental Commission in February
Phone 952 2271125
to go over the existing policies and goals, offer suggestions for revisions and schedule
Fax 952 2271110
an open house to open a dialogue with residents and stakeholder groups
Website
www ci chanhassen mn us
Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow
Kate Aanenson
Surface Water Management Plan Update
January 20, 2015
Page 2
Goal
Number
Goal
Goal Statement
I
Water Quantity
Provide 100-year (1% chance) flood protection
for all structures
Achieve water quality standards in lakes,
2
Water Quality
streams, and wetlands consistent with their
designated uses and established classifications
3
Wetlands
Protect and rehabilitate wetlands to maintain or
improve their function and value.
Erosion and
4
Sediment
Minimize soil erosion and sedimentation
Control
5
Financing
Establish and maintain funding sources to
finance activities of this Plan
Maintain primary responsibility for managing
Regulatory
water resources at the local level but continue
6
Responsibility
coordination and cooperation with other agencies
and organizations
Public
Provide information and educational resources to
7
Education and
improve knowledge and promote an active public
Information
role in management of water resources.
Table ES-1. Chanhassen Surface Water Management Plan Goals
Concurrent with this, staff will begin updating the implementation program, specifically, local
controls that will need to be revised as part of the plan update. Attached to this memorandum
you will find a spreadsheet comparing the various watershed rules and our existing code The
remainder of this report will be dedicated to summarizing the watershed organization rules and
anticipated code changes
FLOODPLAIN PROTECTION
Our code was first adopted in 1986 and was based upon the 1979 Flood Insurance Rate maps
(FIRM) Currently the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is updating the FIRM
maps but should not alter our overlay district. The only anticipated change to current ordinance
will be to require mitigation for any reduction of storage volume
Kate Aanenson
Surface Water Management Plan Update
January 20, 2015
Page 3
EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
This section of the city code is in Chapter 19 and was recently updated In its current form it is
consistent with all other rules Staff is reviewing the current top soil requirement as there is
some ambiguity as to what constitutes "top soil" and how to assure compliance
WETLAND AND CREEK BUFFERS
This regulatory control has the widest disparity between entities and may prove impossible to
reconcile It has long been the practice of Chanhassen to maintain local control to provide a
central location for residents, developers and consultants to come to ask questions and procure
permits Staff is recommending reviewing how setbacks are applied in an effort to bring buffer
rules into compliance with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, but not adopting the Riley -
Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) rules as they are beyond what is required
by any other agency. This would require certain groups and individuals to go to RPBCWD for
permit acquisition The attached bar graph shows a to -scale representation of the various buffer
requirements.
Watershed districts do not require setbacks while cities do as there are development implications
to not requiring setbacks The biggest concern with not having a setback is the expectation that a
secondary structure such as a deck or patio can be installed. If the house is constructed at the
buffer edge, then the opportunity to install a secondary structure is no longer present.
Chanhassen setbacks are 30 or 40 feet and secondary structures may encroach 50% into the
setback
DREDGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL
As these are generally regulated by the DNR and the PCA, Chanhassen does not oversee these
activities Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has had a dredging rule in effect for some time
now and has administered this permit with no apparent issue Given this, staff does not
recommend adding dredging and sediment removal to our local controls.
SHORELINE AND STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
As these are generally regulated by the DNR and the watersheds, Chanhassen does not oversee
these activities aside from requiring a zoning permit to assure that there is no conflict with
utilities Minnehaha Creed Watershed District has had a shoreline stabilization rule in effect for
some time now and has administered this permit with no apparent issue Given this, staff does
not recommend adding dredging and sediment removal to our local controls.
Kate Aanenson
Surface Water Management Plan Update
January 20, 2015
Page 4
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
There will be significant modifications to the stormwater management code and design
standards These are found primarily in Chapter 19 but are referenced elsewhere. These
modifications are not only a result of changes to watershed plans but changes to the National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System — Municipal Separate Storm
Sewer System Permit (MS4). The primary focus of these changes will be to incorporate volume
control into the standards and to provide credit to utility fees for compliance with the rule
changes
ATTACHMENTS
1 Buffer Comparison
2. Watershed Rule Matrix
g \eng\terry\surface water management\2014 swmpg3 update\ineetmgs\memo_planningcom_012015 docx
WIDTH IN FEET MANAGE
CLASS 162 3 4 5 6 7 j 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 201 .2_1.._2 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 411 421 431 411 4_ 5L I 471 8L 491 101 511 _5_2 554[5_5.I_5I_5_8IA] 121 131 141 171 68I 611 711 711 721 711 141 711 711 771 711 791 80II2-1 231_��
CHANHASSEN BUFFER = 40' CHANHASSEN SETBACK = 20' CHANHASSEN SETBACK 2 STRUCTURE = 20
PRESERVE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MIN BUFFER=67'AVG BUFFER=75'
RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MIN BUFF ER=40 ' AVG BUFFER=80'
Add up to 15 for slopes and 10' for stormwater not to exceed SO
CHANHASSEN SETBACK = 15 CHANHASSEN 2' STRUCTURE = 15
MANAGE 1 3T AVG=40' '
RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WD - MIN BUFFER = 30' AVG BUFFER = 60'
CHANHASSEN BOF '=20 CHANHASSEN SETBACK = 15 CHANHASSEN 2' STRUCTURE = 15
MANAGE 2 MINNEHAHA CREEK WD- MIN =24 AVG=30' I
RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF WD MIN=20' AVG =40'
C;_ 0 Add up to 15 for slopes and 10' for stormwater
CHAN SETBACK = 15' CHANHASSEN 2' STRUCTURE = 15
MANAGE 3 WM'N=
RPBCWD MIN
=10 AVG =20'
CREEKS I
RBCWD
STANDARD CHANHASSEN RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT NPDES MS4 PERMIT NOTES
ALTERATIONDPLAIN
ALTERATION
THRESHOLD
These uses shall be permitted within the F000dway District to the extent that they are not
prohibited b an other ordinance or watershed district regulations and provided the do
p y y g y
not require structures, fill, or storage of materials or equipment In addition, no use within a
floodway district shall be permitted to adversely affect the capacity of the channels or
floodways or any tributary to the mainstream or of any drainage ditch, or any other
drains a facility ors stem
Any land -disturbing activities or filing of land below the 100-year fllod elevation
of a waterbody in the watershed
No person shall alter or fill land below the 100-year high water elevation without
a permit
QFQ
�JP�
�Q�
The RPBCWD rule only applies within Boodplains All of Bluff Creek is already
within SCOD and Chanhassen requires a 50 foot setback from top of bank of
watercourses already Lakes have a setback of between 50' and 150' On
subdivisions it has been our practice to acquire floodplain in outlot.
44CFR 60.3(d)( )) Communities must prohibit encroachments within regulatory
floodways (44 CFR 59 1) unless it is demonstrated through hydro analyses
that it would not result in ANY increase in flood levels
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
In Chanhassen the 100 floodplain is concurrent to the floodway
Any alteration of surface water flows below the 100-year flood elevation
diverting, obstructing or newly outletting
FLOODPLAIN
ALTERATION CRITERIA
Two feet freeboard above 100 year elevation
No new impervious surface w/in 10- ear flood > 10%
We have no mitigation requirement
1 1 volume mitigation
2-feet freeboard
No adverse effect on flood risk, base flow, channel stability
No increase in flood elevation
50' setback regardless of flood lain
No structure w/in 100 feet of centerline of watercourse excepting bridges and
trails 10' width
Fill shall not result in a net decrease in storage capacity Mitigation shall occur
cement of fill tcannot include expansion of shoreline
cionrto
e garamg must cormwi a cross-section
origin
WETLAND AND CREEK
BUFFERS THRESHOLD
With the creation of any new lot
Rule B Flood lain Management
Stormwater Management Rule
Buffer should be required anytime that a wetaand is impacted or a mitigation
area is created
Rule E Dredging
Water Body Crossings Rule
Rule F Shoreline Stabilization
New rinci al residential strucure with net increase in hardcover
Rule G Watenrlbody Crossings
Rule J Stormwater Management
Applies to Properties Encompasing or adjacent to a public watercourse, PWI
Wetland or other protected wetland
Applies to Properties Encompasing or adjacent to any watercourse within a
High Risk Erosion Area can provide contrary evidence
WETLAND AND CREEK
BUFFERS DISTANCES
Preserve = 40' MIN 140' SETBACK [80FEETJ
Exceptional = 80' AVERAGE 140' MINIMUM
Preserve = 75' BASE / 67' MINIMUM
Suggest altering setbacks to become consistent with MCWD and letting
RPBCWD�nfoLatheirswn tt&rrrtlg.LSoUt redrinq§gjbdc),_ _ _ _
Fxisftq 1_fami 20'AVG/ 10' MIN _ _ _ _ _ _ _
For linear projects it shall be limited to the extent of the right-of-way
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Need to go throw h criteria for classification for each
Manage 1 = 25' MIN 130' SETBACK 55 FEET
High Value = 60' AVG / 30' MIN
Manage 1 = 40' BASE/ 34' MIN
Man e 2 = 20' MIN 130' SETBACK 50 FEET
Medium Value = 40' AVG / 20' MIN
Manage 2 = 30' BASE / 24' MIN
Manage 3 = 16.5' MIN 130' SETBACK 146.5 FEET
Low Value = 20' AVG / 10' MIN
Manage 3 = 20' BASE / 16' MIN
NA
PW Watercourse = 50' AVG / 30' MIN
NA
High -risk a ercourse =
WETLAND AND CREEK
BUFFERS
ESTABLISHMENT AND
MAINTENANCE
Must be planted and maintained with native vegetation of varying percent composition
but can't be noxious or invasive species
Must be planted and maintained in native vegetation May not cultivate 7o—w
or pasture the buffer area.
Must rip soils, establish native vegetation and have a maintenance and
montioring plan
1fertifize
Monuments required 1 per lot no more than 300 feet.
May selectively remove noxious, etc and use herbicide/pesticide
Monuments required every 100 feet
No fill material or structure except boardwalk, sidewalk and stormwater features shall be
allowed within buffer
No fill material or structure except boardwalk, sidewalk and stormwater
features shall be allowed within buffer
No fill material or structure except boardwalk, sidewalk and stormwater
features shall be allowed within buffer
Shall be recorded against the property
Recorded against deed
Performance Bond
50 CY or 5000 SF
50 CY or 5000 SF
EROSION & SEDIMENT
When tributa to water of the state
THRESHOLD
u ree an ig y Erodible lane
EROSION & SEDIMENT
CRITERIA
CONSISTENT
DREDGING & SEDIMENT
REMOVAL
0�k
SOP
`?�
P
O�
Permit required to remove 1 CY or more of sedmient
No dredging within ny public water
Leave with watershed districts
Only permitted for maintenance, nutrient reduction or wildife
Same as RPBCWD
No permit required if an approved DNR permit is procured
City can get fast track permit up to 20CY with 48 hour notice
DREDGING & SEDIMENT
REMOVAL STANDARDS
Must be minimal impact solution
Must be minimal impact solution
Cannot alter original alignment slope or x-section
ID spoils disposal site
Cannot enlarge natural basin or create new connections
Must include plan to remediate sediment source where possible
Will not occur above the OHW
Remainder same as RPBCWD
Cannot occur in channel steeper than 3:1 or lake 101
Ecolo icall sensitive
anno cause seepage or resu in su su ce rainage
SHORELINE &
STREAMBANK
STABILIZATION
Q VP
Q
�O�P
Permit required for any improvement or stabilization of a streambank or
shoreline rip rap, sand blanket, etc
Same as RPBCWD Sand blanket may be fastracked
Add zoning permit provision for review ofclear cutting and other shoreland
requirement but leave with districts and DNR
No permit if DNR permit issued
No permit to maintain existing if in -kind replacement
SHORELINE &
STREAMBANK
STABILIZATION
Must demonstrate need
Must provide shoreline erosion intensity calculations to justify
Sequencing Bioengineering
Sequencing consistent with shoreline EIC
Combination hardsca a and bioengineering
With shear strees talcs to support can o riprap
Used DNR criteria for design
Retaining walls generally prohibited
Sand blankets follows DNR rules
STANDARD CHANHASSEN RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MINNF14A11A r:RFFK WATPPRwr-in n1STP1rT AIDIICC UCA DCD111IT
These development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or
Subdivision of property one acre or larger into or more lots, alteration of
New development and re -development projects with one acre or more
We need to evaluate our triggers. One (1) acre perhaps too large but
STORMWATER
project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water
topography to effect runoff from 1 ac or larger lot
disurbance This shall include areas less than 1 ac if part of larger commong
RPBCWD triggers too low Creation of three or more lots, site plan that
MANAGEMENT
management features Le no minimum threshold
50CY FILL
plan of development
disturbs 10,000SF, creation of more than 5,000SF impervious surface,
TRIGGER
SF Disturbance
3 Lot Subdivision
3 Lot
redevelopment that does not result in decrease in hardcover Language
1961 TP 40 Major Facilities desinged based upon 100-YR type II, Minor facilities
No distinction
desi ned for 1 YR ad evaluate 100-YR
Atlas 14 or most recent NWS reference data
Atlas 14 or most recent NWS reference data
Existing permitees shall revise as necessary current program to implement and
No increase in 1 , 10- and 100-year where SW discharges across site
enforce a Post -Construction Stormwater management program that reduces
No Increase in peak rates from proposed project for 1 or2, 10, and 100 year Variances
z
Limit peak flow rates to existing for 2 , 10- and 100-year storms for all points
boundary For ag land new development shall not increase rates over modeled
water pollution after construction related to new development and
allowed if computations show no
W
where stormwater discharges site
meadow condition.
redevelopment
Will need to define "at each discrete outlet" and no variances.
----------------------
No volume requirements
Provide for abstraction of 1 1 Inches of runoff from impervious surface. Must
No net increase from pre -project from pre -project conditions on annual basis of
a-
0
;
Volume required via MS4 MCWD CCWMO and NPDES Construction.
oretreat
runoff for infiltration and filtration features Must have 3-feet separation.
Provide for abstraction of first 10 inch of rain from impervious surface
dischar a volume, TSS and TP
Recommend MIDs
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
J-
New development shall result in no net increase in TP from existing conditions
Owners and/or operators of constructgion activities must submit site plans with
60%TP and 90%TSS
Removal 60%TP and 90%TSS Abstraction counts to compliance
Ag land shall be modeled as meadow conditionpost-con
SW management BMPs to permitee for review and approval
No BMPs required on existing single family homes
Existing single family home sites largely exempt from design standards but
No BMPs required on single family homes
No BMPs required on single family homes
We should set a minimum threshold. Anything below falls to District
must install a BMP consistent with some MN guideline. MN WM MID
Otherwise we administer.
There are several areas deficient on treatment and storage (town center)
o----------------------
wRedvelopmenl
with <50% disturbance only treat new impervious and disturbed
Nospecific requirement. Has been practice to address new impervious
o
>50% then all area
Requirements vary depending upon size of site the percent of the site
NET REDUCTION ON ANNUAL BASIS Volume, TSS and TP
Should adopt policy for redevelopment anyway
disturbed and whether impervious surface is reduced or increased,
Limit peak flow rates to existing for 2 10- and 100-year storms for all points
Maximum extent practicable and must make "reasonable attempt" to purchase
w
where stormwater discharges site
New road or trail > 10,000 SF must meet all requirements
additional R/W
o
Projects between 5000SF and 1AC provide 1 1" abstraction from new
Road recon wl>10,000SF and <1ac new impervious must meet P and rate
No specific requirements for linear projects
Ofimpervious
control
a
z
Projects >1AC new impervious must provide abstraction of larger 0.55" runoff
from new impervious surface or, 1 1" from net increase HC
Road recon > lac new impervious must meet all requirements
Applicant must provide narrative listing and explaining variables that limit
feasibility of 1 inch. Narrative and concept plan discussing how reasonalble
There are conditions in which infiltration is prohibited - contaminated soils, less
Applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of district engineer that above
modifications to project would influnce feasibility of meeting 1" An explanation
than 3 feet to ground water, etc Must achieve volume reduction to max extent
We have no vooume requirement so hence no restricted site sequencing and exceptions
r—
cannot be met Then followingsequencing
of efforts undertaken b applicant to accomodate or remove constraints
practicable MEP usingother techniques reuse, green roofs, etc
Xu
Abstraction of at least 0.55 inches from applicable impervious surfaces, or
Must achieve abstraction of greatest amount feasible and at least 0.5 inches
STORMWATER
Abstraction of runoff on-ste to greatest extent practicable, or
Must treat full Inch for P They offer unique credits trees
MANAGEMENT
Off -site abstraction and treatment.
CRITERIA
Adopt MIDs and MN SW manual sequencing and prohibited infiltration areas.
All scenarios must meet 60%TP 90%TSS requirements
2 feet of free board
2 feet of freeboard
landlocked 2 feet above back to back 100 year events or 10 day snowmelt
Landlocked basins designed to hold back to back 100-YR
whichever is greater
Landlocked must hold back-to-back 100 year events
0
w
Requirements for outletting landlocked dead storage requirements, review
oE
downstream impacts, demonstrate need
May not increase volume draining to land locked receiving area
Modeling
Stormwater volume and rate analysis for 1, 10 and 100
Site plan w/ property lines, all contributing subwatersheds proposed BMPs,
delineation of existing waterbodies, existing and proposed NWL of OHW, 2-foot
Site plan with property lines, contrours and NAIL & 100-YR
contours, construction plans for stormwater BMPs
Geotech analysis at all proposed SW management locations
soils sampling Ian to at least 5 feet at proposed facility locations
as built drawings showing that compliant with approved plans
Soil ammendment plan following MN SW Manual guidance
All hydrologic hydraulic & water quality calcs used in the design
All hydrologic, hydraulic & water quality calcs used in the design
Create 0&M plan and declaration
All facilities designed with maintenance access
All facilities designed with maintenance access
U
In perpetuity maintenance
In perpetuity maintenance
Facilities maintenance inspection and monitoring Ian
Facilities maintenance inspection and monitoring Ian
az
Eu
Identifies schedule of activities & Responsible a ies
Identifies schedule of activities & Responsible a ies
z
Provides for inspections and maintenance in perpetuity with records available
at district's request
The plan must be recorded against the deed
The plan must be recorded against the deed
Construction or reconstruction of a single-family home
New development with less than 20% impervious or less than one acre area
o
?5
�O
Redevelopment of a site less than 5 acres that will result in 10% or greater
X
decrease in impervious surface or a site greater than 5 ac where less than 40%
�
disturbed & 10 /o reduction impervious
LU
Linear transportation projects with less than 10,000 SF of new impervious
Sidewalks and trail 12 feet or narrower with an impervious downslope buffer at
least 50% as wide