Loading...
PC SUM 2015 05 19 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES MAY 19, 2015 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, Steve Weick, Maryam Yusuf, John Tietz, and Nancy Madsen MEMBERS ABSENT: Lisa Hokkanen STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC HEARING: ND BEEHIVE 2 ADDITION, PLANNING CASE 2015-10: REQUEST FOR REZONING OF APPROXIMATELY TWO ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6440 HAZELTINE BOULEVARD FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RSF) TO MIXED MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-8); REPLAT OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6330 HAZELTINE BOULEVARD AND 6440 HAZELTINE ND BOULEVARD INTO TWO LOTS (BEEHIVE HOME 2 ADDITION) WITH VARIANCES; AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A 10,700 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO A CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT FACILITY (BEEHIVE HOMES), WITH VARIANCES. APPLICANT: TYLER STEVENS. OWNERS: TYLER STEVENS AND BENJAMIN & HIDEKO GOWEN. Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item. Alyson Fauske discussed issues related to stormwater, traffic analysis, pedestrian crosswalk, and sanitary sewer. Commissioner Madsen asked if the private road was sufficient to service emergency vehicles. Commissioner Weick asked for clarification of the hard surface coverage calculations and drainage. Commissioner Tietz asked if the stormwater pond would impact any future plans with the ghost plat. The applicant Tyler Stevens, 6505 Fox Hollow Court discussed the need for the addition and lot line th configuration. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. Gary Reed, 2461 West 64 Street noted he was happy with the BeeHive development and would support the addition. Jan Reed, same address stated she’s heard nothing but positive comments about Tyler as a person and the development from neighborhood residents. Ben Gowen, 6440 Hazeltine Boulevard stated he was very much in favor of this development. Chairman Aller closed the public hearing. Yusuf moved, Madsen seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approvePlanning Case #2015-10 to rezone 0.9 acres of property from RSF, Single Family Residential District, to R-8, Mixed Medium-Density Residential for Lot 1, nd Block 1, BeeHive Home 2 Addition subdivision contingent upon final plat approval, as shown in plans dated received April 17, 2015, and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Planning Commission Summary – May 19, 2015 Yusuf moved, Madsen seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the preliminary plat with a variance to allow a private street for Planning nd Case 2015-10 for BeeHive Home 2 Addition as shown in plans dated received April 17, 2015, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Engineering Conditions: 1.All conveyances, drainage ways and stormwater treatment devices must be included within a drainage and utility easement as required in Section 18-76 (c). 2.The perimeter drainage and utility easement must be vacated and re-platted to border the new property lines. 3.The proposed drainage and utility easement over the proposed sanitary sewer must be widened to facilitate the utility maintenance and excavation of the pipe. 4.The portion of the private driveway that would be shared for access will be considered a private street under the city code. It must, therefore, have a 7-ton design and a joint access and maintenance agreement must be created between the two parcels. 5.The private street will need a name labeled on the plans. Name suggestions shall be submitted to the City for approval. 6.The drive aisle of the parking lot must be revised to provide 26 feet wide from face of curb. 7.The new trunk lines will be owned and maintained by the City. The services connecting to the buildings will be private. 8.The sanitary sewer pipe under the new section of driveway is set at a 5.02% pitch. The grade on that pipe section shall be adjusted to a 0.50% slope to provide future gravity sewer to as much of the southern property as possible. 9.Plan and profile sheets are required for all publically-owned utilities. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Yusuf moved, Madsen seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the site plan consisting of a 10,700 square-foot addition continuing care retirement facility, Planning Case 2015-10 for BeeHive Homes as shown in plans dated received April 17, 2015, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Planning Conditions: 1.The existing monument sign shall be moved to the new access into the site to clearly define the access for emergency vehicles. 2 Planning Commission Summary – May 19, 2015 2.Approval of the site plan is contingent upon approval of the rezoning, subdivision and vacation of drainage and utility easement. 3.All rooftop equipment must be screened. Building Official Conditions: 1.The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. A “Code Record” is required (Code Record schematic plans may be same scale as architectural). For “Code Record” information go to MN Dept. of Labor and Industry: http://www.dli.mn.gov/CCLD/PlanConstruction.asp 2.Retaining walls in excess of 48 inches in height must be designed by a professional structural engineer licensed in the state of Minnesota. 3.A demolition permit is required for removal of any existing structures. 4.The buildings must be protected with automatic fire sprinkler systems. 5.An accessible route must be provided to buildings, parking facilities, public transportation stops and all common-use facilities. 6.All parking areas, including parking garages, must be provided with accessible parking spaces dispersed among the various building entrances. 7.Accessible units must be provided in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. 8.The building owner and/or their representatives should meet with the Inspections Division to discuss plan review and permit procedures. In particular, occupancy group, type of construction and allowable area issues must be addressed. Fire Marshal Conditions: 1. “No Parking Fire Lane” signs and yellow-painted curb will be required on the new driveway. Only one side of the driveway will be posted “No Parking.” Contact the Chanhassen Fire Marshal for exact locations. Engineering Conditions: 1.A stable conveyance must be provided to the proposed infiltration basin identified as 5P on the drainage plan. 2.The applicant must create a HydroCAD model for the entire site using data from Atlas 14 and demonstrate the pond created with the first phase can accommodate additional drainage. 3 Planning Commission Summary – May 19, 2015 3.The applicant must model the conveyance to the infiltration basin as a reach and demonstrate that the grass filter swale meets the MN Stormwater Manual guidelines for pretreatment. 4.The applicant is required to meet a water quality volume of one (1) inch runoff from all new impervious surface. 5.The applicant must provide a water quality model, as required by Section 19-144 of the city code, showing that there is a 60% reduction in TP and 90% reduction in TSS as required by city code and the NPDES permits. 6.The plan set shall include a detail specific to each bioretention feature which is consistent with the MN Stormwater Manual. 7.Plugs and live plants shall be used in lieu of seed and a planting schedule and maintenance plan shall be developed and submitted for city approvals and record retention for both bioretention features. 8.The stormwater management plan shall treat the runoff from the proposed drive. 9.The applicant shall prepare and submit to the City for approval a Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) consistent with the NPDES Construction Permit which shall contain all required elements as listed in Parts III and IV of the permit. 10.The plans shall indicate that six (6) inches of topsoil are to be placed on all disturbed areas to be vegetated and a stockpile area shall be indicated on the plan set. 11.A final stabilization plan shall be prepared for the site. 12.The plans shall show locations proposed for stockpile areas. 13.A soils report shall be submitted to staff indicating soil conditions and permeability. 14.The grading plans must be revised to show the first floor elevations of adjacent lots. 15.Spot elevations must also be shown to illustrate the drainage pattern near the existing home’s driveway. 16.The proposed grades on the site shall be no greater than 3:1. 17.The engineer shall coordinate with MnDOT and incorporate their comments. 18.The radius of the driveway curves must be shown on the plan set. 19.The trail width shall be labeled on the plan set. 20.The plan shall be revised to reconstruct the trail further north to create a better connection. 4 Planning Commission Summary – May 19, 2015 21.The new addition is subject to sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. These charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. 22.The developer’s engineer must incorporate the latest edition of Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates into the plan set. Environmental Resource Conditions: 1.Install tree protection fencing around all preserved trees shown on grading plans. The fencing shall be installed prior to any construction activity and remain until site construction is completed. 2.Site plantings shall be increased to meet minimum bufferyard requirements. Plantings shall be located so as to soften direct views in areas where the proposed building is closest to property lines. 3.Bufferyard plantings shall be located on the west side of the entryway drive rather than on the east as proposed. 4.A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the city showing proposed plantings adjacent to the entire parking area that limit direct views of the pavement and the vehicles.” All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: DAYCO CONCRETE CUP/SPA AMENDMENTS, PLANNING CASE 2015-11: REQUEST FOR AMENDMENTS TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2001-02 ND SITE PLAN AGREEMENT 2001-05 TO ALLOW SCREENED OUTDOOR STORAGE ON PROPERTY ZONED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AND LOCATED AT 1850 LAKE DRIVE WEST (DAYCO CONCRETE). APPLICANT/OWNER: LDW PROPERTIES. Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Tietz asked about security fencing and drainage. Commissioner Madsen asked what items can be stored outside. Chairman Aller asked if the applicant agreed with the conditions. Commissioner Weick asked about parking requirements. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. Undestad moved, Yusuf seconded that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan amendments to allow screened outdoor storage for LDW Properties, to be located on Lot 2, Block 1, Chanhassen Business Center, shown on the plans dated received April 17, 2015, subject to the following conditions: Planning 5 Planning Commission Summary – May 19, 2015 1.The Conditional Use Permit shall be restated to “outdoor storage is prohibited unless it has been approved under site plan review.” 2.No unlicensed or inoperable vehicle/equipment shall be stored on the premises. 3.Outdoor storage is limited to the construction equipment outlined in this report. 4.The applicant shall work with city staff to complete full screening of the outdoor storage space through landscaping. Water Resources Coordinator 1.Materials shall be free of concrete. No cleaning or maintained of equipment can occur in this area. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Yusuf noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated April 21, 2015 as presented. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. Chairman Aller reminded everyone that there is one more th Mayor Is In on May 28 at City Hall. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Kate Aanenson discussed action taken by the City th Council at their May 11 meeting and upcoming Planning Commission agenda items. Undestad moved, Yusuf seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim 6