PC Staff Report 9-17-19PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
REPORT
Tuesday,September 17,2019
Subject Consider a Request for a Variance to Replace and Move a Septic System to the Bottom of the
Bluff at 1181 Homestead Lane
Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No:B.1.
Prepared By MacKenzie Young-Walters,Associate
Planner
File No:Planning Case 2019-12
PROPOSED MOTION:
The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the bluff setback and encroachment into the Bluff
Creek primary zone for the construction of a septic system,adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision and
directs the applicant to:
Submit plans showing conformance with City Ordinance and City Standards for the subsurface sewage treatment
system (SSTS)being installed in the front yard,or provide further justification of the impracticability of such a
location for an SSTS e.g.a geotechnical report or perk test if the concern is fill/disturbed soil).
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The applicant is proposing to replace an existing septic system with a system that encroaches into the Bluff Creek
primary zone as well as into the required bluff setback.
APPLICANT
John Jensen II,1181 Homestead Lane,Chanhassen,MN 55317
SITE INFORMATION
PRESENT ZONING:Rural Residential District,RR
LAND USE:Large Lot Residential
ACREAGE:2.5 acres
DENSITY:NA
APPLICATION REGULATIONS
Chapter 19,Water,Sewers and Sewage Disposal,Article IV,Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems
Chapter 20,Article II,Division 3,Variances
PLANNING COMMISSIONSTAFFREPORTTuesday,September 17,2019SubjectConsideraRequest for a Variance to Replace and Move a Septic System to the Bottom oftheBluffat1181HomesteadLaneSectionPUBLICHEARINGSItemNo:B.1.Prepared By MacKenzie Young-Walters,AssociatePlanner File No:Planning Case 2019-12PROPOSEDMOTION:The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the bluff setback and encroachment into theBluffCreekprimaryzonefortheconstructionofasepticsystem,adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decisionanddirectstheapplicantto:Submit plans showing conformance with City Ordinance and City Standards for the subsurface sewagetreatmentsystem(SSTS)being installed in the front yard,or provide further justification of the impracticability of suchalocationforanSSTSe.g.a geotechnical report or perk test if the concern is fill/disturbed soil).SUMMARY OFREQUESTTheapplicantisproposingto replace an existing septic system with a system that encroaches into the BluffCreekprimaryzoneaswellasintotherequiredbluffsetback.APPLICANTJohnJensenII,1181 Homestead Lane,Chanhassen,MN55317SITEINFORMATIONPRESENTZONING:Rural Residential District,RRLANDUSE:Large LotResidentialACREAGE:2.5 acresDENSITY:NAAPPLICATION REGULATIONS
Chapter 19,Water,Sewers and Sewage Disposal,Article IV,Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems
Chapter 20,Article II,Division 3,Variances
Chapter 20,Article XI,RR”Rural Residential District
Chapter 20,Section 20-1401,Structure Setbacks Bluffs)
Chapter 20, 20-1564 Structure Setbacks Bluff Creek primary zone)
BACKGROUND
Pioneer Hills was platted on February 4,1985.The house was built in 1986.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the variance to permit construction of the septic system within the
bluff setback and Bluff Creek primary zone since a feasible alternative that conforms to ordinance may be installed,
adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision and directs the applicant to:
Submit plans showing conformance with City Ordinance and City Standards for the SSTS being installed in the front
yard,or provide further justification of the impracticability of such a location for an SSTS e.g.a geotechnical report or
perk test if the concern is fill/disturbed soil).
ATTACHMENTS:
Staff Report
Findings of Fact and Decision Denial
Findings of Fact and Decision Approval
Development Review Application
Narrative
Survey
Septic Site Sketches
Public Hearing Notice
Affidavit of Mailing
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
PC DATE: September 17, 2019
CC DATE: September 23, 2019
REVIEW DEADLINE: October 15, 2019
CASE #: 2019-12
BY: RG, EH, JS, ET
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The applicant is proposing to replace an existing septic system with a system that encroaches
into the Bluff Creek primary zone as well as into the required bluff setback.
LOCATION: 1181 Homestead Lane
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Lot 10, Block 3, Pioneer
Hills, Carver County,
Minnesota
PID 256100190)
OWNER: John Jensen II
1181 Homestead Lane
Chanhassen, MN 55317
PRESENT ZONING: Rural Residential
District (RR) and Bluff Creek Overlay
District (BCO).
2030 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Large
Lot
ACREAGE: 2.5 acres DENSITY: NA
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The city’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed
project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The city has a relatively high
level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established
standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision.
PROPOSED MOTION:
The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the bluff setback and encroachment in
to the Bluff Creek primary zone for the construction of a septic system and adopts the attached
Findings of Facts and Decision.”
Note: A motion for approval and appropriate Findings of Fact are also included at the end of the
report.)
Planning Commission
1181 Homestead Lane – Planning Case 2019-12
September 17, 2019
Page 2 of 6
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
PROPOSAL/SUMMARY
The applicant would like to install their septic system within the Bluff Creek primary zone as
well as encroach into the bluff setback zone.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 19, Water, Sewers and Sewage Disposal, Article IV, Subsurface Sewage Treatment
Systems
Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3, Variances
Chapter 20, Article XI, “RR” Rural Residential District
Chapter 20, Section 20-1401, Structure Setbacks (Bluffs)
Chapter 20, 20-1564 Structure Setbacks (Bluff Creek primary zone)
BACKGROUND
Pioneer Hills was platted on February 4, 1985. County records indicate that the house was built
in 1986.
Bluff Creek
Primary Zone
Planning Commission
1181 Homestead Lane – Planning Case 2019-12
September 17, 2019
Page 3 of 6
SITE CONDITIONS
The property is zoned Rural Residential District and is located within the city’s Bluff Creek
overlay district. This zoning classification requires lots to be a minimum of 2.5 acres and that the
primary zone be preserved as permanent open space.
The exiting septic system is failing and must be replaced.
SITE CONSTRAINTS
Wetland Protection
There is not a wetland located on the property.
Bluff Protection
There is a bluff on the property.
Shoreland Management
The property is not located within a shoreland overlay district.
Floodplain Overlay
This property is not within a floodplain
Bluff Creek Corridor
The property is located within the Bluff Creek overlay district.
Variances within 500 feet:
Variance 2007-28, 951 Homestead Lane, variance to permit a 1,177 square foot accessory structure
on November 20, 2007.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing a septic system to be installed in a naturally wooded area within the
Primary Zone of the Bluff Creek Watershed District as well as near a bluff. The existing site has
100% tree cover from the home to the Powers Boulevard right-of-way. Locating the septic field in
this area will permanently affect the wooded area and primary zone. A number of homes own a
share of the continuous wooded area and have protected the area since the development of the area.
Staff recommends that protection of the wooded area continue. Ideally, an alternative location
Planning Commission
1181 Homestead Lane – Planning Case 2019-12
September 17, 2019
Page 4 of 6
could be found on the property for the system. If not, then a tree survey showing the system located
as to minimize tree removal should be required and replacement plantings be approved by the city.
The Engineering Department has reviewed the Variance submittal for 1181 Homestead Lane.
These comments are divided into two categories: general comments
and proposed conditions. General comments are informational
points to guide the applicant in the proper planning of public works
infrastructure for this project, to inform the applicant of possible
extraordinary issues and/or to provide the basis for findings.
Proposed conditions are requirements that Engineering recommends
be formally imposed on the developer in the final order. Note that
references to the “City Standards” herein refer to the Standard
Specifications and Detail Plates.
General Comments/Findings
1. Any and all utility and transportation plans submitted with
this application have been reviewed for the purpose of
determining the feasibility of providing utility and
transportation facilities for the project in accordance with
City Standards and City Ordinances. Recommendation of a
variance approval does not constitute final approval of
details, including but not limited to alignments, materials and
points of access, connection or discharge, that are depicted or
suggested in the application. The applicant is required to
submit detailed construction drawings and/or plat drawings
for the project, as applicable. The City of Chanhassen
Engineering and Public Works Department will review plans,
in detail, when they are submitted and approve, reject or
require modifications to the plans or drawings based upon
conformance with City Standards, the Chanhassen Code of
Ordinances and the professional engineering judgment of the
City Engineer.
2. It is the opinion of the Engineering Department that the
proposed subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)
variance should not be approved as other locations on the
subject property would allow for the SSTS to function
properly while not creating the need for a variance from bluff
and slope setbacks based on the information provided.
a. Upon submittal of the variance request, the
applicant’s justification for not locating the SSTS in
the front yard was discussed under point 3.c. “Moving
Planning Commission
1181 Homestead Lane – Planning Case 2019-12
September 17, 2019
Page 5 of 6
the entire system to the front yard would also be problematic as there is not enough
workable space to install a system.”
b. After review by staff it was determined that there was enough room to install the
SSTS between the existing garage and existing house. As currently designed, the
treatment area requires 1,600 square feet, while the front yard provides over 2,400
square feet of workable area outside building setbacks and slope/bluff setbacks.
c. Staff reached out to the applicant to obtain further justification to point 3.c. and
received a follow-up e-mail on September 5, 2019 in which the contractor
concluded: “there is no room in the front due to the well setback and all cut and fill
or compacted soils, and the contours do not work either.”
d. After re-reviewing the setbacks (well and slopes) from the provided plans, staff
determined that there was enough room as discussed in item 2.b. of this report and
that if there are concerns regarding compacted soils, a type 3 system should be
proposed and subsequent perk tests provided to ensure feasibility.
3. Staff will reassess the recommendation for denial of variance if further justification is
provided for the infeasibility of the front yard location for installation of the SSTS. See
Condition 1.
Proposed Conditions
1. Submit plans showing conformance with City Ordinance and City Standards for the SSTS
being installed in the front yard, or, provide further justification of the impracticability of
such a location for a SSTS (e.g. a geotechnical report or perk test if the concern is
fill/disturbed soil).
SUMMARY
The applicant’s proposed project does not comply with city ordinance. Based on staff’s review,
an alternative system compliant with City Code could be installed. The Building Department
supports any comments or concerns that the Soil & Water Conservation District and Water
Resources has concerning the placement of the septic system.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the variance to permit construction of the
septic system within the bluff setback and Bluff Creek primary zone since a feasible alternative
that conforms to ordinance may be installed, adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision
and directs the applicant to:
Planning Commission
1181 Homestead Lane – Planning Case 2019-12
September 17, 2019
Page 6 of 6
Submit plans showing conformance with City Ordinance and City Standards for the SSTS being
installed in the front yard, or provide further justification of the impracticability of such a
location for a SSTS (e.g. a geotechnical report or perk test if the concern is fill/disturbed soil).
Should the Planning Commission approve the variance request, it is recommended that the
Planning Commission adopt the following motion and attached Finding of Fact and Decision:
The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves the bluff setback variance and
encroachment into the Bluff Creek primary zone for the construction of a septic system as shown
in the plans shown on the Certificate of Survey by SISU Land Surveying dated 8/19/19, subject
to the following conditions, and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision.
1. The applicant is required to submit detailed construction drawings and/or plat drawings
for the project, as applicable. An engineer-designed plan is required to divert the existing
drainage ravine that would be impacted by the proposed SSTS.
2. The applicant shall apply for a septic permit for the septic system.
3. The applicant shall provide further justification of the impracticability of such a location
for a SSTS (e.g. a geotechnical report or perk test if the concern is fill/disturbed soil).
4. An erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval.
5. The applicant shall submit a tree survey showing the system located as to minimize tree
removal should be required. All trees 6” and larger in and around the construction area
shall be shown. Replacement planting will be required in areas cleared outside of the
septic fields. Plans and quantities shall be approved by the city.
6. Tree protection fencing shall be installed to protect trees and vegetation outside of the
construction area.”
ATTACHMENTS
1. Finding of Fact and Decision Denial
2. Finding of Fact and Decision Approval
3. Development Review Application and Narrative
4. 1181 Homestead Lane Survey
5. Septic Site Sketches
6. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List
g:\plan\2019 planning cases\19-12 1181 homestead lane var\staff report-1181 homestead ln-pc.docx
1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
DENIAL)
IN RE:
Application of John Jensen II for variance from the bluff setback and encroachment into the
Bluff Creek primary zone for the construction of a septic system on a property zoned Rural
Residential District (RR) - Planning Case 2019-12.
On September 17, 2019, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals
and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The
Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and
mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Rural Residential District (RR).
2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Large Lot.
3. The legal description of the property is:
Lot 10, Block 3, Pioneer Hills, Carver County, Minnesota
4. Variance Findings – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the
granting of a variance:
a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive
plan.
Finding: The intent of the city’s bluff protection and Bluff Creek Overlay District
ordinances are to protect the city’s natural areas and aquatic resources by establishing a
minimum bluff setback as well as preserve the Bluff Creek corridor. These two
requirements are designed to work together to prevent excessive development that could
generate unnecessary alterations which could potentially degrade the bluff area as well as
Bluff Creek.
b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical
difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the
property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this
Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct
sunlight for solar energy systems.
2
Finding: An alternative system compliant with City Code could be installed without a
variance.
c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone.
Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations.
d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by
the landowner.
Finding: While the septic system has failed and must be replaced, an alternative system
compliant with City Code could be installed.
e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Finding: The property is located in one of the city’s large lot residential subdivisions.
The properties within 500 feet of the parcel have septic systems that comply with city
ordinances. The proposed encroachment into the Bluff Creek primary zone and bluff
setback could lead to other alterations to the natural area of the neighborhood.
f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota
Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter.
Finding: This does not apply to this request.
5. The planning report #2019-12, dated September 17, 2019, prepared by Robert Generous,
et al, is incorporated herein.
DECISION
The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies a variance request to allow a
variance from the bluff setback and encroachment in to the Bluff Creek primary zone for the
construction of a septic system.”
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 17th day of September, 2019.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
BY:
Steven Weick, Chairman
g:\plan\2019 planning cases\19-12 1181 homestead lane var\findings of fact and decision 1181 homestead ln (denial).docx
1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
APPROVAL)
IN RE:
Application of John Jensen II for variance from the bluff setback and encroachment in to the
Bluff Creek primary zone for the construction of a septic system on a property zoned Rural
Residential District (RR) - Planning Case 2019-12.
On September 3, 2019, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals
and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The
Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by
published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Rural Residential District (RR).
2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Large Lot Residential.
3. The legal description of the property is:
Lot 10, Block 3, Pioneer Hills, Carver County, Minnesota
4. Variance Findings – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the
granting of a variance:
a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive
plan.
Finding: The installation of a septic system in this location will have a minimal impact
on the bluff and the Bluff Creek primary zone. Once installed, the site can be revegetated
to maintain the environmental benefits of the area.
b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical
difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the
property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this
Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct
sunlight for solar energy systems.
Finding: The applicant cannot install a compliant septic system on the property without a
variance.
2
c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone.
Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations.
d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by
the landowner.
Finding: The property is located in an older subdivision and the existing structure does
not conform to the current zoning code. The parcel is significantly smaller than the
minimum size required for riparian lots zoned RSF. The lot’s substandard size and pre-
existing house placement means that a two-car garage cannot be situated on the lot
without a variance.
e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Finding: The property is located in a large lot residential subdivision. The proposed
construction of a septic system in the Bluff Creek primary zone and within the bluff setback
will not alter the essential character of the locality and will provide a working septic system.
f. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota
Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter.
Finding: This does not apply to this request.
5. The planning report #2019-12, dated September 17, 2019, prepared by Robert Generous, et
al, is incorporated herein.
DECISION
The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance from the bluff
setback and encroachment in to the Bluff Creek primary zone for the construction of a septic
system, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant is required to submit detailed construction drawings and/or plat
drawings for the project, as applicable. An engineer-designed plan is required to
divert the existing drainage ravine that would be impacted by the proposed SSTS.
2. The applicant shall apply for a septic permit for the septic system.
3. The applicant shall provide further justification of the impracticability of such a
location for an SSTS (e.g. a geotechnical report or perk test if the concern is
fill/disturbed soil).
4. An erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval.
3
5. The applicant shall submit a tree survey showing the system located as to minimize
tree removal should be required. All trees 6” and larger in and around the
construction area shall be shown. Replacement planting will be required in areas
cleared outside of the septic fields. Plans and quantities shall be approved by the city.
6. Tree protection fencing shall be installed to protect trees and vegetation outside of the
construction area.”
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 17th day of September, 2019.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
BY:
Steven Weick, Chairman
g:\plan\2019 planning cases\19-12 1181 homestead lane var\findings of fact and decision 1181 homestead ln (approval).docx
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
IlkPlanningDivision—
7700 Market Boulevard
CITY OFCHANIIASSENMailingAddress—P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317
Phone: (952)227-1300/Fax: (952) 227-1110
1 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Submittal Date: [ , ( l(.r 1 ( 9e`)PC Dat ' I I I gCC Date ` I-)3 1 1 60-Day Review Date: ! '
t
k`S.- I, n
Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply)
Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 600 El Subdivision (SUB)
El Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers $100 El Create 3 lots or less 300
Create over 3 lots 600 + $15 per lot
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) lots)
Single-Family Residence 325 El Metes & Bounds (2 lots) 300
All Others 425 Consolidate Lots 150
ElInterim Use Permit(IUP)
CI Lot Line Adjustment 150
El In conjunction with Single-Family Residence..$325
Final Plat 700
Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)*
425AllOthers Additional escrow may be required for other applications
through the development contract.
Rezoning (REZ)
Planned Unit Development (PUD) 750 El Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way(VAC) $300
Minor Amendment to existing PUD 100 Additional recording fees may apply)
El All Others 500
El Variance(VAR)200
Sign Plan Review 150
El Wetland Alteration Permit(WAP)
Site Plan Review(SPR) Single-Family Residence 150
Administrative 100 All Others 275
Commercial/Industrial Districts* 500
Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area:
El Zoning Appeal 100
thousand square feet)
Include number of existing employees:
CI Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) 500
Include number of new employees:
Residential Districts 500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently,
the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
Plus$5 per dwelling unit (units)
18 Notification Sign (City to install and remove) 200
Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre-application meeting) 3 per address
y addresses)
Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply) 50 per document
Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Site Plan Agreement
ElVacation
6
Variance Wetland Alteration Permit
Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) Easements ( easements) El Deeds
TOTAL FEE:
Section 2: Required Information
Description of Proposal: Asking to alloy m right to the edge of the e.a ement Eas eet on
w- ..' . . ..- .. r.• : _ e . ture.
Property Address or Location:
1181 Homestead Lane
Parcel#:
10
Legal Description: Section 26 Township 116 Range 023
Total Acreage:
2.5
Wetlands Present? Yes No
Present Zoning:
Mixed Low Density Residential District(I
Requested Zoning:
Not Applicable
Present Land Use Designation:
Residential Low Density Requested Land Use Designation: Not Applicable
Existing Use of Property: Single family home
Check box if separate narrative is attached.
Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information
APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained
authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to
the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by
the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application
should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this
application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I
further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to
any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name: Contact:
Address: Phone:
City/State/Zip: Cell:
Email: Fax:
Signature:Date:
PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do,
authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those
conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of
the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may
be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the
study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name:
John Jensen
Contact:
Address:
1181 Homestead Lane
Phone:
612-790-3614
City/State/Zip:
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Cell:
612- 790-3614
Email:
jjensenii2@msn.com
Fax:
Signature:Date:
This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by
applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist
and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural
requirements and fees.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A
written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application.
PROJECT ENGINEER(if applicable)
Name: Contact:
Address: Phone:
City/State/Zip: Cell:
Email: Fax:
Section 4: Notification Information
Who should receive copies of staff reports? Other Contact Information:
El Property Owner Via: 0 Email Mailed Paper Copy Name:
El Applicant Via: Email El Mailed Paper Copy Address:
El Engineer Via: Email El Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip:
El Other* Via: El Email Mailed Paper Copy Email:
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select yt..rORIV to save a copy to your I
device. and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT ;to send a digital
copy to the city for processing.
SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMIT FORM
f\-)
Variance Request 1181 Homestead Lane
1. The septic system at 1181 homestead was found to be failing during an inspection of the
property.The septic system needs to be replaced because there are no available sewer lines.
2. A Variance is being requested to put the septic system at the bottom of the bluff. Any septic
system that is installed within 50 feet of the bluff with 25%grade requires a variance. Because
of an easement on the property extending 75 feet into the property,the septic system has to be
installed closer to the bluff.
3. This placement of the septic system at the bottom of the bluff is the optimal placement
a. Installing the septic system at the top of the bluff would also require a variance
b. This will be an optimal place as it will allow for ease of connection to a future sewer
system.There is sewer pipe along the property, but it is not currently connected to the
city sewer system.This will be a future development.
c. Moving the entire system to the front yard would also be problematic as there is not
enough workable space to install a system.
d. The easement of 75 feet, does not allow for the septic system to be installed further
away from the bluff.
e. The septic system when installed will still be 75 feet from the property line due to the
easement.
f. Several properties along Homestead lane have Septic systems at the bottom of the bluff,
however they have additional flat land and may not have needed a variance.
IIMMINIMIM
I
00
ac
111
2
N" [ / , ,. /..,..
v..„../''7. -_ _.------ _ --
t
f
s„,,,,,_,
i , i
ds
11111
s'
ti 7
f 1:'--
t
Px
til
Ik/
ZE
tilt
y
w.. I .
t ,
r
CIV
r
j
y
I.--,F
P.
4
f .
Ill—r
C
Q
d
1 Nr
A flk ii , ilk
C ---7---)1 ti
s ,7,'..."CZ. . . ,
s, tk, ; fil.
11110.,
1 ZA)
1- ;{ .c._ •
1>
f r,
i
7.
44444‘
4 ' •Cah
emsodoompe
N_,
t..-
113 ) I
97-
7/7 I ,•
etirn _...._ 41 \
t' • - ,I
1
ac,.._. i /• /0...
IIll*
IZ,- k
i 0 L,4,
t
I
k kvii1
i1ol ..,. .4
t. . ..._:____ I1 1
N.„,
m i;
7.-: t 0-
1r,
I14N
f
ii
i -:_.....
iz. ite-
I. .
1 ICI Ai .1
I
IR
1-
411 4 ri•
1... . . - , ?
t.1 4
i
4i 0.51 1
fii ,
10,..... , . , ;•,,,.:,
r--
4
ti L • ..' -_ ,.:, -.,./,-- •
4. trtt •'*:-'---.1...' -' ---:-... _______,
4z .&..
P. /
oixasA- /ago - Aasz.
is
1
1, 7:S7
N.,...
s....L., ......
m.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING CASE NO. 2019-12
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a
public hearing on Tuesday, September 17, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in
Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request
for a variance to replace and move a septic system to the bottom of the bluff at 1181 Homestead
Lane. Zoned Rural Residential (RR). Owner: John Jensen.
A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the city’s
web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2019-12 or at City Hall during regular business hours.
All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with
respect to this proposal.
MacKenzie Young-Walters
Associate Planner
Email: mwalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Phone: 952-227-1132
Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on September 5, 2019)
g:\plan\2019 planning cases\19-12 1181 homestead lane var\ph notice to villager.docx