The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda and PacketAGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, APRIL 27, 2020 CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD A.7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) B.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS 1.Arbor Day Announcement C.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. 1.Approve City Council Minutes dated April 13, 2020 2.Resolution 2020XX: Proclaiming May 2 as Arbor Day 3.Release of Settlement Agreement pertaining to RPBCWD Parcel swap for CSAH 101 Improvements 4.Award Bids for Chanhassen City Hall Reception Area Remodeling Project 5.Award Low Quote, Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach Playground Border Concrete 6.2020 Watercraft Inspection Agreement D.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda) E.OLD BUSINESS F.PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.Resolutions 2020XX & 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 2002: Award Contract and Approve Assessment Roll 2.Resolution 2020XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Public Hearing Order Improvements and Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, APRIL 27, 2020CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)B.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS1.Arbor Day AnnouncementC.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated April 13, 20202.Resolution 2020XX: Proclaiming May 2 as Arbor Day3.Release of Settlement Agreement pertaining to RPBCWD Parcel swap for CSAH 101Improvements4.Award Bids for Chanhassen City Hall Reception Area Remodeling Project5.Award Low Quote, Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach Playground BorderConcrete6.2020 Watercraft Inspection AgreementD.VISITOR PRESENTATIONSVisitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete andsubmit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda)E.OLD BUSINESSF.PUBLIC HEARINGS1.Resolutions 2020XX & 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No.2002: Award Contract and Approve Assessment Roll 2.Resolution 2020XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Public Hearing Order Improvements and Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications 3.Resolution 2020XX: 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 2005: Order Improvements and Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications G.NEW BUSINESS H.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS I.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS J.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION 1.Review of Claims Paid 04272020 2.Fire Department Update 3.Law Enforcement Update K.ADJOURNMENT L.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 27, 2020 Subject Arbor Day Announcement Section PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Item No: B.1. Prepared By Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Coordinator File No: DISCUSSION In 1876, Minnesota became the fourth state to adopt Arbor Day as an annual celebration. Today, Chanhassen celebrates Arbor Day each year in order set aside a time to consider what trees do for us and our community. Planting trees adds beauty and character to our neighborhoods, reduces energy costs, increases property values, reduces pollution, and replaces trees we’ve lost in our community. Perhaps Elton Trueblood said it best when he wrote, “A man has finally begun to discover the meaning of human life when he plants a tree under which he knows full well he will never sit.” Let us plant today, the trees of tomorrow. The City of Chanhassen has been celebrating Arbor Day each year for 25 years. This year will be different and yet it can be the same in spirit. We will not be gathering for Arbor Day this year, but I invite all area residents to celebrate Arbor Day in Chanhassen at home. Plant a tree, take a walk in the woods, do a nature craft, or donate to a reforestation organization. Take a moment to recognize how trees make our city a better place to live. In times of stress, nature provides a respite from the worries and an opportunity to refresh our spirits. Celebrate Arbor Day in your own way safely at home. ATTACHMENTS: Arbor Day Proclamation WHEREAS, Climate change is a complex problem that impacts all Minnesotans and our ability to thrive, and WHEREAS, The health and longevity of Minnesota’s trees are being affected by changing temperatures and precipitation, more extreme weather events, and increasing pressure from pests, diseases, and invasive species, and WHEREAS, Minnesota is at risk to lose over one billion ash trees due to emerald ash borer, potentially increasing C02 emissions and flooding, and WHEREAS, A healthy tree canopy decreases temperatures along streets providing cooler spaces in the summertime for recreation and commerce, and WHEREAS, About three-quarters of Minnesotans get their drinking water from the forested parts of the state; and WHEREAS, Shade from trees protects people from exposure to the sun’s UV rays and diminishes heat-related illness, and WHEREAS, Trees reduce stormwater runoff and act as a filter, preventing sediments and pollutants from washing into waterways, and WHEREAS, Trees capture carbon from the atmosphere and store it in their trunks, roots, and soil, and WHEREAS, Minnesotans can help build resilient communities and reduce the negative impacts of climate change One Tree at a Time by planting and caring for trees and by using wood products to store carbon into the future. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Elise Ryan, Mayor of the City of Chanhassen, do hereby proclaim Saturday, May 2, 2020 as: ARBOR DAY And the month of May 2020, as Arbor Month in the City of Chanhassen. ARBOR DAY OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY OF CHANHASSENMayor Elise RyanDate: April 27, 2020 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 27, 2020 Subject Approve City Council Minutes dated April 13, 2020 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.1. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the City Council minutes dated April 13, 2020.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: City Council Verbatim Minutes dated April 13, 2020 City Council Summary Minutes dated April 13, 2020 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING APRIL 13, 2020 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Jake Foster, Kate Aanenson, Charlie Howley, Todd Hoffman, and Roger Knutson Mayor Ryan: Alright well good evening everybody. Welcome to our council meeting. I hope that everybody had a happy Easter. Thank you for joining us tonight in what I believe is our first ever virtual meeting in the history of council meetings. For the record we do have all council members present. I am here in the council chambers and 4 of our council members are joining us via Zoom meeting. Our first action is our agenda approval. Council members are there any modifications to the agenda as printed and as I call your name please state yes or no. Councilman McDonald? Any modifications to the agenda? Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Sorry about that. My mic was on muted. No. Mayor Ryan: Alright. Councilwoman Tjornhom? Councilwoman Tjornhom: No. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Coleman? Councilwoman Coleman: No. Mayor Ryan: Councilman Campion? Councilman Campion: No. Mayor Ryan: Alright we will proceed with the published agenda. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Ryan: First I would like to review the guidelines for this meeting. This is our first attempt at a Zoom meeting so I ask for everybody’s patience as we work through this process. As we go through the agenda I will be asking each council member for a verbal acknowledgement throughout the agenda item and then ask for a roll call vote if required before Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 2 moving to the next agenda item. No council member will be holding or discussions on the side through the Zoom applications. All discussions will be made public. Two of our agenda items do include presentations or comments from the applicant and we will follow the same format that we have always used for our council meetings. We have coordinated with each of the applicants to join us via Zoom meeting. This is new for all of us but I am confident in our ability to do this successfully as we have an outstanding IT team that has really worked hard to getting us prepared so thank you to them. Before we dive into the agenda I would like to again acknowledge the great work of our city employees who have kept the city running effectively. From City Hall staff, our first responders, to the public works and park maintenance crews, thank you for your hard work. It’s amazing to think that one day we’re sweeping streets and the next day we are plowing those same streets so we can only do that in Minnesota but thank you for your hard work. Thank you also to the many volunteer organizations, church groups, individuals and our amazing senior commission for helping those in need. Chanhassen is an amazing community whose neighbors continue to look out for each other. And to those on the front lines, our medical professionals as well as our teachers, thank you for all that you do to improve our lives and those of our children. We will continue to work through this together and I again encourage all of you to go to our website and utilize the resources that are available should you need any support. I know that these are trying times but please know that there are people available to help. Administratively we are still operating under the Peacetime Emergency Declaration and asking residents to follow the shelter in place executive order put forth by Governor Walz. Social distancing. Staying at home are so important for all of us to remain safe and healthy and get through this challenging time so I thank you for your diligence. CONSENT AGENDA: Mayor Ryan: Council members are there any items that you would like to consider separately? Councilman McDonald? Councilman McDonald: No. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Tjornhom? Councilwoman Tjornhom: No. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Coleman? Councilwoman Coleman: No. Mayor Ryan: Councilman Campion? Councilman Campion: No. Mayor Ryan: Could I get a motion to approve consent agenda. I’m asking for a motion. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 3 Councilman McDonald: I’ll make the motion to approve the consent agenda. Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilman Campion: Second. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Mayor Ryan: We’ll give that to Councilman Campion. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated March 9, 2020 2. Approve Special City Council Minutes dated March 20, 2020 3. Resolution #2020-19: Municipal State Aid Street Funds Advance 4. Approve Arbor Day Poster Contest Winners 5. Resolution #2020-20: Approve Consultant Agreement for Materials Testing on City Project 20-02, Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation 6. Approve Radio Replacements for Utility Billing System 7. Resolution #2020-21: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20-03: Accept Feasibility Study; Call Public Hearing 8. Resolution #2020-22: Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2020 Sealcoat Project 9. Approve Purchase, Park Equipment Replacement Schedule for Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach 10. Approve City of Chanhassen Temporary Policies and Guidance Response to COVID-19 Pandemic All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 4 Mayor Ryan: Next we have visitor presentations. Visitor presentations are included with each of our regularly scheduled council meetings. Recognizing that with the shelter in place order you may not feel comfortable attending this meeting and we encourage you to stay at home out of an abundance of caution for those of us who are in the council chambers. We did create an email address and the link is on our website to submit questions or comments. The council chambers is open if you would prefer to come in at future meetings. We do not have anyone in the chambers tonight nor did we receive any emails this past week. But at this point in our meeting is where I would have asked and answered those questions. We will continue to have this available at our next meeting as well because we want to make sure that we still provided our residents an opportunity to participate without having to come to chambers if they are not comfortable in doing so. We still have a Citizen Action Request form available online if your request includes a specific action item from City Council or staff and we did not receive any of those this past week either so no visitor presentations this evening. APPROVE AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT – 195 WEST 79TH STREET. Mayor Ryan: Next is old business and I’m operating off of many different sheets here so I appreciate your patience. Next is old business and it’s to approve the amendment to an Option Agreement and Ms. Aanenson I will pass this to you. Kate Aanenson: Thank you. This item is regarding the purchase agreement signed by Mr. Matthew Rosati to buy the property that the City owns at 195 West 79th Street. So his intention was to develop a brewery and that purchase agreement stated that he must close on the property on June 10th, 2020 so in order to close on the property he was required to submit a site plan but we have been working with his architect and Mr. Rosati and are making good progress but he submitted a letter requesting additional time based on the circumstances today. He’s also put some additional information for some of the factors of why he would like an extension. So I’ll let him talk a little bit about that but I want to point out for the City Council that we did have the attorneys draft an extension letter so that extension would be for 3 months and it would go through September 10th and that’s, that would be what we’re asking you to approve tonight is the amendment to the option for purchase to September 10th. So I believe Mr. Rosati is available for questions if the council has any questions of him. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Ms. Aanenson. Before, Mr. Rosati before I turn it over to you to make a few comments I will again go down the line and ask council if you have any questions for Ms. Aanenson. Councilman McDonald? Councilman McDonald: I have one question. In reading the letter do I understand that an additional option for him to be able to sell the property…is included in this motion? Kate Aanenson: I don’t believe that’s how it’s structured. He’s still the purchaser. He just has some investors with him and then he would work with them and retain the property but I’ll let you ask Mr. Rosati that question. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 5 Matthew Rosati: Now I’m working correct? Mayor Ryan: Go ahead. Matthew Rosati: Hi. I was hoping to actually add a clause where if I had a developer come in, purchase the land and build the building that we’ve been working towards I would like that added to the clause. Just based on what’s been going on it’s become a lot bigger project than I had initially planned a year ago. Development is just another beast that I’m not 100 percent familiar with so it’s definitely been a large learning curve. I have had a few developers recently, I was hoping to actually have a contract signed by the end of March but with the COVID-19 they’ve all kind of put a 6 month hold on anything right now spending any money so I’m kind of scrambling to talk to other developers or either other investors so whether it’s company or private I have a few people I’ve talked to. It’s just more of kind of starting all over. The industry, the hospitality industry has really struggled since the shut down and not too many people are willing to actually put a time into a project that includes hospitality so I kind of lost a lot of ground in the last month and that’s kind of why I’m asking for an extension. To be honest with you I’m not even sure if 3 months we’ll actually be able to, will be enough time at this point just because of how much time it is pushing projects back. Whether it’s construction or new businesses. Kate Aanenson: I was going to see if Todd wanted to. Mayor Ryan: Mr. Gerhardt? Todd Gerhardt: Matt this is Todd Gerhardt, the City Manager for the City of Chanhassen. So be it months, be it 6 months, the purchaser of the land would be Frontier Land Holdings LLC. Matthew Rosati: That was the original plan. That’s correct. When I had been a couple, a couple different things that I’ve talked to other developers. They said that they were like loan Frontier LLC the money to purchase the land and then I would transfer it over to the actual developer or if I could actually get verbiage in the contract where they can purchase it for the actual Holding Company instead of kind of the shell game. Transferring money from one account to another. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah. Currently the purchase agreement doesn’t call for the transfer of property from the City to anybody but Frontier LLC. Frontier Land Holdings LLC so you know we don’t know who that other potential person is or their financial background or anything like that so there’s no assignment rights in the purchase agreement and I’m only saying that for the council’s benefit and for any input that the City Attorney would want to give. Roger Knutson: Mayor, members of the council. This amendment changes the date to September 10, 2020. It does not authorize the assignment of this agreement to anyone else. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 6 Mayor Ryan: So to clarify Mr. Knutson then it would in September he can’t transfer or sell to anyone else? It has to be to Frontier Land Holding. Roger Knutson: We have to sell it to them. That’s what this agreement provides period. Todd Gerhardt: Once he owns it then he can do whatever he wishes to do. Roger Knutson: Yes. Todd Gerhardt: You know call it a shell game or whatever but our agreement is with Frontier Land Holdings. And it’s nice that he shares that with us so. Roger Knutson: Yes once he owns it he can sell it to someone else. Todd Gerhardt: Yep. Roger Knutson: We only have to sell it to him. Matthew Rosati: I’m not trying to sell it to someone else. It’s just more of starting a business and developing land are, they’re tasks in itself and for one person like me just to try and start a business and then also try and develop a land is definitely become a very, it’s just a large undertaking. I’m proud of what I’ve accomplished. I mean it was just a year ago that I was writing an RFP for the City and at this point, you know less than a year since I’ve actually was signed the actual agreement. I was almost bring a site plan to the City so it’s definitely a lot of work has gone into this. It’s just for me back in January I realized how much work it is and also what I’m going to need to do to actually complete it by myself and it’s just not something that at this point that I would be able to do. But I could, but I can if I have a developer purchase the land and build the building for me and lease it from them and still be able to accomplish, open our brewery with the designs that myself and my architect have done and potentially purchase it later on down the line. I’ll try to get that in the purchase or the agreement with the actual developer. Mayor Ryan: Anything else Ms. Aanenson before I move to the next council person? Kate Aanenson: No. I think probably just to get a feel so everybody can hear. Mayor Ryan: Okay perfect. Thank you. Councilwoman Tjornhom any questions or comments? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Not at this time. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Coleman? Councilwoman Coleman: No I’m good. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 7 Mayor Ryan: And Councilman Campion? Councilman Campion: I do have a question and I don’t know if this is for Roger or Todd but my question is, so if he, if we grant him the extension to September, between now and then if he did come back with this specific party. You know try to sell it to a particular developer, is that something we could consider between now and September? What is the council procedure? Roger Knutson: Mayor and council you could agree or not agree to an additional change to the option agreement. Todd Gerhardt: Now or into the future. Roger Knutson: Yeah until the period time is up. Yes. Mayor Ryan: Anything further Councilman? Councilman Campion: No. Mayor Ryan: Ms. Aanenson I have a quick question and it’s I guess in line with what Mr. Campion just said and Mr. Rosati made reference that to as well. If it, this may go beyond the 3 months and looking more like 6 months. Is it then the Council’s authority to continue to grant these extensions? Kate Aanenson: Yep. Roger Knutson: Yes. Mayor Ryan: Okay. So we could revisit this again in September. I know that a lot of it has to do with the COVID situation and banks lending and you know there’s a lot that goes into it so we would be able to re-evaluate it at that time. You know see what happens over the course of the next 3 months and I know Mr. Rosati you’ve been in touch with Ms. Aanenson and working through all this and I know you know that from the outpouring of support from the folks in Chanhassen and the surrounding areas how much they want to see this come to fruition so I just encourage you to continue to work with Ms. Aanenson as we move through this process. Matthew Rosati: I definitely appreciate it, thank you. Mayor Ryan: Council members any further questions or either the applicant or staff? Councilman McDonald? Councilman McDonald: No further questions. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 8 Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Tjornhom? Councilwoman Tjornhom: No further questions. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Coleman? Councilwoman Coleman: No further questions. Mayor Ryan: And Councilman Campion? Councilman Campion: No further questions. Mayor Ryan: Alright with no further questions could I get a motion please. Councilman Campion: I’ll make a motion. Mayor Ryan: Councilman Campion. Councilman Campion: Mayor I propose that the City Council approves an amendment to the Option Agreement for 3 months to September 10, 2020. Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilwoman Coleman: I’ll second the motion. Mayor Ryan: Alright Councilwoman Coleman with a second. We have a valid motion and a second. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded that the City Council approve an amendment to the Option Agreement for 3 months to September 10, 2020. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Ryan: That motion carries 5-0. Thank you Mr. Rosati for coming and joining us on our historical Zoom meeting. Matthew Rosati: Yeah this is awesome. I definitely appreciate it. Us in the jail we actually we with our admin through Zoom as well so it works out really well. I appreciate all your hard work too. Mayor Ryan: Great, thank you. Continued luck and we’ll look forward to connecting here shortly. Matthew Rosati: Sounds great, have a great night. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 9 Mayor Ryan: Thank you, you too. AUTHORIZE REFUND OF A PORTION OF ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FEES; APPROVE 2020 LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS. Mayor Ryan: Alright next is new business and we have the authorization of refund of on-sale liquor license. That’s Mr. Gerhardt. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor and council. The item before you is our on-sale liquor license fees for all our restaurants and bars in Chanhassen and as a part of the motion staff is asking that due to COVID-19 that since our on-sale liquor stores and restaurants have been closed that we provide a refund of their liquor license for the months at which they’ve been closed and that refund would occur at the time that they would re-open so staff is recommending the refund and approval of the attached list of liquor licenses and direct staff to do background investigations and to do the new operating managers and sign the necessary documentation for the State. Mayor Ryan: Alright thank you Mr. Gerhardt. We will go down the line for questions for Mr. Gerhardt. Councilman McDonald? Councilman McDonald: No questions. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Tjornhom? Councilwoman Tjornhom: No questions. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Coleman? Councilwoman Coleman: Yes just one quick question. I know that the Governor has been approached about potentially allowing restaurants to do carry out wine and beer. Would this be lifted in that event or only when they’re fully opened and operational? Todd Gerhardt: My recommendation would be until they’re fully open. I think they may derive a small portion of liquor sales as carry out portion of their business and I think that would be, I would hope for a short period of time but it’d be my recommendation to do it once their doors are open. Councilwoman Coleman: Great, thank you. Todd Gerhardt: And the total refund for 2 months is approximately $15,000 for all our restaurants and bars. Or 3 months, sorry. Mayor Ryan: Anything further Councilwoman Coleman? Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 10 Councilwoman Coleman: No further questions. Mayor Ryan: Councilman Campion? Councilman Campion: No questions at this time. Mayor Ryan: Alright I do not have any additional questions so with that I would stand for a motion. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I’ll make a motion. Mayor Ryan: Alright, Councilwoman. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yes I’d like to make a motion that the City Council adopts the resolution authorizing a refund of a portion of on-sale liquor licensing fees and approves the 2020 liquor license renewals as listed on the attached sheet contingent upon receipt of all necessary documentation and satisfactory background investigations of new operating managers. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Councilwoman Tjornhom. We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilman McDonald: I’ll second. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Councilman McDonald. We have a valid motion and a second. Resolution #2020-23: Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman McDonald seconded that the City Council adopts the resolution authorizing a refund of a portion of on-sale liquor licensing fees and approves the 2020 liquor license renewals as listed on the attached sheet contingent upon receipt of all necessary documentation and satisfactory background investigations of new operating managers. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Ryan: Alright that motion carries 5-0. I saw Councilman McDonald give a thumbs up so that helps too. APPROVE A REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF WEST 78TH STREET AND WEST OF LAKE ANN PARK FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (RR) TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-16), LOT CONSOLIDATION AND SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 48 UNIT CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT FACILITY. Mayor Ryan: Next we have under new business the approval to rezone the property on the north of West 78th Street. Ms. Aanenson. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 11 Kate Aanenson: Yep that’s me, yep. Thank you. Members of the City Council, Moments of Chanhassen, the applicant Civil Site Group is Patrick Sarver and owner TMSC of Chanhassen LLC Elizabeth Wright and they’re both on, following this item too. The property address is, there’s two properties. 1620 and 1660 Arboretum Boulevard. This item did appear before the Planning Commission on February 4th. So they’re asking for a couple items. Rezoning of the property from Rural Residential District to the High Density Residential District, lot consolidation and site plan review with variances and the intent is to construct a continuing care facility. So the property is located on West 78th Street and located here. The park is just immediately to the east of it and access via West 78th Street. I just want to give a little context for this site. So this property was formerly in 1989 owned by Natural Green Landscaping and the business was moved and the site was restored to more of it’s natural state. With the upgrade of Highway 5 and the construction on the frontage road there was excess right-of-way that was actually acquired by Southwest Transit which is one of their rights they can do when there’s excess right-of-way from a MnDOT project. So in looking at this site the development is very challenging because of the topography, the wetlands, the shoreland district, access to sewer and water and access also off of West 78th Street which is challenging here. So while Southwest Transit, they owned it. They brought in a number of applicants. There was potential for a entertainment center. Kind of a venue. We saw a lot of different things that really didn’t fit on the site for a lot of different reasons. Sometimes it was traffic generations. Sometimes it was the hard surface coverage so having said that when this project came forward we felt like this really was best suited for the site based on trip generation and their ability to kind of model the site, or mold the site to fit on the property. So the developers made a number of compromise and the staff has supported it with some of the variances. So again it’s a continuing care facility. So just to go through the rezoning because I think sometimes we forget how that works so the rezoning has to be consistent with the land use designation so right now it is currently residential low density, or excuse me agricultural but it is guided for high density residential which is what this application is. I also wanted to show our Comprehensive Plan because we get asked this a lot. Are we following how many senior housings do we need so this is what in our recently approved 2040 Comprehensive Plan when we looked at service enriched projects. So this will bring our total to 159. As you’re aware the Avienda project is also advancing and they’ll have some senior housing too so there’s about 157 available as we look for the year, out to the year 2040. Again we’re trying to diversify our different housing stock so this we call service enriched so it falls in that bucket. So again there is sufficient capacity in the City’s plan for that. So the existing conditions. Again the site, as I mentioned before is complex. There’s multiple wetlands. A creek within it so that falls within the Shoreland District which also limits the hard surface coverage and then there’s also height requirements within that so the parcel’s, the project includes two parcels. So one of the things that we’re requiring is that it be consolidated into one parcel. So this illustrative drawing just shows how the building sits on there with kind of the creek and the wetlands are on the site so again that was some of the complexities of working on the project. Again the site plan itself. So the 65,000 square foot continuing care facility takes up about 34.5 percent of the 35 percent so it’s, it was very, very close to meeting the hard surface coverage but they made it work. Again there was a lot of work put in through their engineering Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 12 and architectural staff to make it work and again we’ve been working with the watershed district on this and multiple meetings as did the applicant too to work through some of the balancing of the wetlands in the back and I’ll show you that in a little bit too. So one of the variances was also the front parking. We reduced that in order to allow the site to work and that was one of the variances too and I’ll go through those in a little bit more detail. So this is the front of the building. Again it’s a highly articulated building. The Planning Commission unanimously really thought highly of the architecture and I’m going to ask our AV person to see if they can show the materials sample on the table top. We practiced this. We’ll see if we can make that work. I do have the actual materials. Wait for it, yay. So there’s the material samples there. Again high quality materials. So it’s a terraced style again kind of working at the grading. Because this is memory care there’s a lot of visual aspects out the back of the building which I’ll show here. The landscaping in the back and the wetlands so again fitting in the needs of the end user of the building. So here’s a little bit more detail of the materials. Can we go back to the camera? There we go. So the back of the building is really again for the end users of the building. Materials. Signage. So access coming off of West 78th Street, I’ll show you a little bit more detail on that. The parking. So this again is some of the area that was compromised here and a variance given to make that fit on the site. Again this use fits well in that the number of parking stalls is minimal as compared to when we looked at the event center when you had a lot more traffic coming in and also when you’re looking at some of the peak hours coming down West 78th and peak demand, it fit in really well so they accomplished it by surface parking and then also some underground parking to meet the standards. So the only variance then would have been on the frontage. The landscaping itself. So the parking, that was one of the issues that was brought up and the Planning Commission discussed it too while they were giving the variance. It’s very well landscaped and articulated. We’ve done this in other areas where we’re, on Highway 5 frontage where we’ve asked or the applicant has asked for relief and through additional landscaping created that buffer so staff felt good about that. So again the nexus for the variance would be that they put additional landscaping in there. So the access management, that was one of the things that was looked at too and in accordance with the city code driveways have to, having access off collector roads require a turn around so again that was one of the things that they spent a lot of time working on. One of those things that we thought we were there and then we realized you know how are we going to make that work for emergency vehicles and the like so that also was accommodated and you can see how that works on the site plan. A little bit more detail. So utilities. This was one of the challenges that was out there too for sewer and water connection. The sewer actually has to tie into the Metropolitan Council’s sewer so it’s a little bit longer run to actually connect to the sewer but sewer and water are available and so that can be accomplished and again meeting the city ordinance. Storm water. There’s stormwater treatment on the site via infiltration pond and so they’re meeting all those standards and have met with the watershed district and gotten their approval. So the one other variance that we talked about was the averaging. So the buffer averaging is supposed to be, is proposed to be 20 foot minimum width adhered to so that’s, you can see this, what made it difficult to get the side in. Be able to provide the turn arounds. Eliminate the parking so this was the impact, wetland impact and then the buffer averaging there to meet the setbacks. Depending on the type of wetland, the Manage 1 or 2, it’s 30 feet for the primary structure and then the staff was Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 13 recommending the 5 foot setback be adhered to. So the fire department also wanted to make sure there was a controlled access point coming out the back of the building. That there was a hard surface landing to com out the back so a lot of little changes that were, that had to be made so you can see where that, they wanted to make sure there’s a 5 foot clear zone there to be able to, if they had to get to the back of the building. So again one of the little changes that was made. Mayor Ryan: And how would they access that? Kate Aanenson: Through the back there, looking at a sidewalk to the back. Hard cover. Todd Gerhardt: So they wouldn’t physically drive back there? Kate Aanenson: No. Todd Gerhardt: It would be hauling hose or. Kate Aanenson: Yeah, yeah. So grading proposed in a wetland buffer, we talked a little bit about that. Landscaping plan has to be updated to address the reforestation of the buffer and then the grading proposed outside limits, temporary construction easements. Those are requirements are in the staff report again for adherence and then these are standards that would go into our site plan agreement for disturbance of more than an acre they need NPDES permit and their SWPPP. Those are standard construction practices. So with that the applicant are here. Elizabeth, the owner is also on the line and she’s got another project in Lakeville so I’d like you to hear a little bit from her but we are recommending approval. We’re excited to bring this project forward because we’ve been working on this site for a long, long time and I think it’s a good fit but I think if you have questions they’re both available. Mayor Ryan: Okay thank you Ms. Aanenson. Normally we would go to council questions first but you said that Ms. Wright has to get to another meeting tonight. Kate Aanenson: No they’re available tonight. Mayor Ryan: Oh they’re available tonight, okay. Sorry. With that then council are there any questions of Ms. Aanenson before we ask the applicants to speak. Councilman McDonald? Councilman McDonald: No. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Tjornhom? Councilwoman Tjornhom: No. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Coleman? Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 14 Councilwoman Coleman: No. Mayor Ryan: Councilman Campion? Councilman Campion: No. Mayor Ryan: I have a few but I’d wait to, let’s hear from the applicants and then I’ll follow up with some of my questions. Welcome Ms. Wright and Mr. Sarver. Are you both there? Elizabeth Wright: Yes I’m here. Mayor Ryan: Welcome. If you would like to share a little bit about your project we’d love to hear from you. Elizabeth Wright: I would love to. The first thing I want to do is take a minute and thank everyone involved on the city side of getting us to where we’re at right now. It was truly a partnership. I guess working together and understanding what the needs of the City are and we’re thrilled that the Planning Commission passed us forward and I believe at this point we’ve tried to clear up as much of any of the outstanding issues that may have existed at that Planning Commission. I want to tell you a little bit about the Moments. Moments is a memory care community but it’s more than that. Where do I start? Back in 2014 I was presented with an opportunity to potentially get into the memory care industry and it was, seemed to be a perfect fit. I had two grandparents who both passed away due to dementia and I was in real estate for a number of years and I own a construction company so it provided me an opportunity to try to make a change and one of those changes was seeing what really needs to go into memory care and it’s not just about the beautiful building that we have down in Lakeville but it’s about the people that work in that building and the residents and their family members. I think of this process as a partnership which I said earlier and when I say that I mean that when we had the opportunity to build in Lakeville, going through that process with the City of Lakeville was amazingly, it was informative. It was really a great process and we really built a great partnership and we feel like we’re a part of that community. For me coming to Chanhassen is something that I’m thrilled about in part because for probably about 15 years I was a resident of Chanhassen so it feels like coming home again. So for me the opportunity to build in Chanhassen is something I look forward to. But The Moments itself, when I had the chance to go tour around the country and look at a number of other communities and really try to pick and choose what we wanted to see, we landed on several items that we see as being carried forward throughout any one of the Moments as it gets built. A lot of that is natural light circulating rhythm type of things where we have in the new, or the existing building in Lakeville we’ve got our high vaulted ceilings with so much natural light and if you ever go to the website that’s all natural. We also believe in infloor heating throughout for the residents and up to 6 air changes an hour which what’s going on right now having that clean air is extremely important so we’ve been as technologically advanced as possible. But like I said for us, for me it’s a beautiful building. It’s a beautiful building but if you don’t have that staff inside taking care of those Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 15 residents it’s just another building so what we enjoy and what I’m forward to is the opportunity to bring this to Chanhassen and provide that level of care and that level of love that we showed the residents of Lakeville and as a matter of fact the City of Lakeville just approved at the end of 2019 and we started construction on an expansion of our existing campus to add 60 additional memory care units so we just started that construction last month. But what we look forward to is bringing that and bringing jobs to Chanhassen. We believe in, we don’t have anything less than a CNA for direct caregiver which is important for you to understand. We also have 24 hour nursing. We’ve got LPN’s on 24 hours a day and we’ve got the resident, or I’m sorry the Director of Nursing is an RN so we look forward to it. Again I appreciate everything that’s been going on with these strange times we’re living in right now for you all to get this on your agenda and hopefully allow us to bring the Moments to Chanhassen. I’d truly appreciate it. Mayor Ryan: Wonderful, thank you Ms. Wright. Mr. Sarver is there anything you’d like to add as well before I turn it over to council for any questions? Talk about the design and architecture of the building. We’d love to hear your thoughts as well. I saw you earlier. Matt Kerr: Patrick I think you might be muted on your end there. Patrick Sarver: Okay am I here now? Kate Aanenson: There you are. Patrick Sarver: Can you hear me? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Mayor Ryan: Yes. Patrick Sarver: Oh excellent, alright. Technology on this side so, it’s going to tough to follow Elizabeth. She did such an elegant job explaining the process and it’s been an honor to work with them throughout their two projects that they have going there and then the opportunity to work on this one in Chanhassen. Can you hear me? Todd Gerhardt: We can hear you but we can’t see. Kate Aanenson: There we go. Todd Gerhardt: Now we can. Patrick Sarver: I think the challenge is the video, I’m going to take my headphones off and hold on. I apologize about this. Mayor Ryan: That’s okay. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 16 Patrick Sarver: It worked a second ago I thought. Well. Todd Gerhardt: We got you. Patrick Sarver: Now can you hear me? Mayor Ryan: Yeah. No put them back on. Todd Gerhardt: Put it back on, there you go. You’re good. Patrick Sarver: Okay. Alright thank you very much. It’s been a pleasure working with Chanhassen, the staff and the Moments in adding to their projects. We’ve been working on this for a little over a year and a half and it’s been a thrill. Staff has been wonderful guiding us to where we’re at. Working with the Watershed. I’m convinced we’ve got a much better project for the amount of time that we’ve been involved in it and I’ll stand for any questions. Mayor Ryan: Perfect thank you. Council I’ll go through again and ask any questions of either the applicant or Ms. Aanenson. Councilman McDonald? Councilman McDonald: Not at this time. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Tjornhom? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Not at this time. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Coleman? Councilwoman Coleman: Yes just one question for Kate Aanenson was reading through the packet and I know it mentioned that a couple of members of the Planning Commission had some concerns that were addressed. Can you quickly go through those concerns? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Thank you. I actually had a slide on that too. So when it did come before the Planning Commission and the Minutes are a little more detailed of that but two commissioners voted no of not supporting the project. They all agreed in the architectural and overall layout but they were concerned about the variance request and I think the 3 that were in favor felt like they were warranted and again as I mentioned this is a remnant piece of property and it’s really pinched by a lot of other natural features so the property that’s surrounding it is over 100 acres so we felt like the, because of those constraints the lot remnants that the, and the rest of the Planning Commission did too so that was the vote on the 4 to 2. Did that answer your questions Councilwoman Coleman? Councilwoman Coleman: Yes thank you. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 17 Kate Aanenson: I meant to bring that up, thank you. Mayor Ryan: Before I get to you Councilman Campion I just want to follow up on Councilwoman Coleman’s comments. What specifically about the variance? Kate Aanenson: Well I think they felt like, because of the back of the wetlands that that impact, they didn’t want to see that happen on the other property. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Kate Aanenson: And so, and then the frontage one also, there’s so much more land that it didn’t need to have the same variances because there’s enough room to work there and this is really a pinched piece with the creek the way it touches down so they felt like they don’t want to give a variance that may set a precedent to the one next door. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Thank you. Councilman Campion? Councilman Campion: No questions. Mayor Ryan: Alright Ms. Aanenson could I just go back to that. I was obviously reading through the Minutes from the commission meeting and so I know that one of the bigger concerns was the, you know impeding into the bluff and some of the restoration that was going to take place. Is that, when Ms. Wright was talking about some of the things that they came back with and the change of their landscaping plan, I felt like that was one of the more contentious conversation points of the meeting is the landscaping. Kate Aanenson: I would agree and I think that’s, I think Ms. Wright addressed how that was being handled. I think part of it was the illustrations at that meeting weren’t probably not reflective of what they were trying to accomplish so working with the watershed district and working through the City’s Forester, getting that plan revised and the watershed district we believe met the intent of what the majority of the Planning Commission wanted. Mayor Ryan: And did they provide, I know there was somewhat of a design. What can you show on your power point what was changed or what was added? I know there was some on the front as well as the back and then around the perimeter of the building. Kate Aanenson: So I think illustratively that, so if you look at the back of the building, I think this drawing here. Let’s see from the back here. This is that edge of the wetland so that was some of the wetland characteristics that they wanted to enhance. So I think this is larger than, so if you look at this drawing there’s not that much space. It’s more like this and so and those will all be, those are some, when we put the site plan agreement together they’ll have to put security Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 18 in place to make sure that that covers the replacement that they have to put in place and that will be inspected and we hold the security for that. That they have to be built as drawings show. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Kate Aanenson: So there’ll be a definitive plan showing all that. Mayor Ryan: So the top picture isn’t correct. It’s the bottom picture. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Ryan: Is what is the correct vision. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Yeah, yeah. Yep so one’s more looking at the building. One’s more looking at the landscape. Mayor Ryan: Okay gotch ya. And then there was a lot of conversation I think that had to do with the turn around in the parking lot and pinch points. There was a lot of question on that. How was that remedied with the parking lot? Did any of the, did the design actually end up changing? Kate Aanenson: Yeah so this is showing how it works. So that one has to be reviewed by the City Engineer or the Fire Department to make sure that that turn around radius works and we believe that meets that so. Mayor Ryan: So by approving this tonight are we approving that drawing or is it going to then be reviewed again? Kate Aanenson: It’ll be reviewed again before they issue the permit, correct. Mayor Ryan: Okay, okay. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor and council members what this does, it’s a drawing that engineers use to show that a semi or a normal vehicle can make the maneuver into the site without going to oncoming traffic so if you could show that drawing again. So that shows the movement of each of the automobiles that it can make the maneuvers within their lane to get into the site. Mayor Ryan: And is that the access to the underground parking or is that just a parking lot there? Kate Aanenson: There’s additional parking. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 19 Kate Aanenson: And access to the underground and kind of the service area. That would be on this. The mic’s not on. That would be going this way to the underground service area. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Kate Aanenson: But as the City Manager said that would allow us so you don’t have to back out onto this. So you can back up here. Mayor Ryan: And is that for staff parking? Resident parking? Kate Aanenson: There is staff underneath. There is guest parking over on that farthest end so. If you go back to the original parking and maybe Elizabeth or Patrick may want to address. Mayor Ryan: I just think it’s the ease of parking for elderly visitors possibly. You know it’s hard to turn your neck and see behind you and I guess I get a little bit nervous about some of the movement. Kate Aanenson: Sure, maybe Patrick or Elizabeth could answer that question. Patrick Sarver: I’d be happy to. This is Patrick. The graphic that we were referring to or we were pointing at earlier, that was proving that the fire truck, that the Chanhassen large size fire truck will be able to drive into the site and that’s essentially what that graphic was showing. From an operation standpoint the parking that’s nearest the front door, those will be maintained to open so that there convenience to the visitors and the guests that do come so that they’ll be able to utilize the closest access to the doors. Employee parking is available underneath and then we’ll also be whatever extra parking is needed, those employees will be encouraged to park at the farthest spots away. Mayor Ryan: Okay perfect, that makes sense. I appreciate the clarification on how that, how the parking was laid out. Kate Aanenson: Yeah I think the Planning Commission discussed too. There’s a sidewalk in front here too to get so if there is. Mayor Ryan: There is okay. Kate Aanenson: Yeah to the front door, yeah. Mayor Ryan: Okay. And you said there is a sidewalk in the back as well? Kate Aanenson: Well they talked about a landing for the. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 20 Patrick Sarver: There will be, this is Patrick again. There will be a sidewalk that’s added to the back again at the request of the Fire Marshal for exiting from the rear door. That was the concern and so I mean if you look at the site the pinch point, it’s that elevated wetland in the back that really constricts. There’s a lot of elements that need to happen through the middle. It’s the wetland piece. It’s the building. It’s two way traffic and parking at an entrance that all, that pinch point is essentially in the, it bisects the site and so the challenge, this has been a challenge for the entire site is how can you get everything, how can you make it feel accessible and easy to get in and out of as much as possible while responding to a natural feature that you’re trying to, and it’s been a credit to the staff and to the watershed and to the Forester and everybody involved to be able to come up with a compromise solution that I think fits the site really well. Mayor Ryan: Perfect thank you and then my final question just has to do with the, you know there was some concern about just the water. You know the runoff I know with a lot of, I think it was Commissioner McGonagill who mentioned that the development to the north and then eventually other things getting developed in this area, the impact to the watershed and what were some of the comments from the watershed? Kate Aanenson: Sure so this is the stormwater basin on this side and then there’s also a proposed rain garden so they worked through the watershed district on that and I believe that’s what Mrs. Wright talked about too is getting a better project by going back to the watershed district and refining that. Mayor Ryan: Okay, and that was one of the changes that was made since the commission? Kate Aanenson: Yep and then how they’re treating that for the abstraction correct. Mayor Ryan: Okay perfect. Thank you. Thanks for the clarification on all those points. Council any other questions? Councilman McDonald? Councilman McDonald: No further questions at this time. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Tjornhom? Councilwoman Tjornhom: No further questions. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Coleman? Councilwoman Coleman: No further questions. Mayor Ryan: Councilman Campion? Councilman Campion: No questions. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 21 Mayor Ryan: Alright with no further questions I would stand for a motion. Councilman McDonald: I’ll do the motion. Mayor Ryan: Alright Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: I propose that the Chanhassen City Council approves an ordinance rezoning property from Rural Residential District to High Density Residential District (R-16), lot consolidation and approves a resolution for site plan review with variances for the construction of a 48 unit continuing care retirement facility, The Moments of Chanhassen as shown in plans dated January the 6th, 2020. Revised February the 18th, 2020 subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendations. Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilman Campion: Second. Mayor Ryan: Councilman Campion with the second. We have a valid motion and a second. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the Chanhassen City Council approves an Ordinance rezoning property from Rural Residential District to High Density Residential District (R-16), lot consolidation and approve Resolution #2020-25: for site plan review with variances for the construction of a 48-unit continuing care retirement facility (The Moments of Chanhassen), as shown in plans dated February 18, 2020, subject to the following conditions of approval and adopts the findings of fact and decision: 1. REZONING The City Council approves an Ordinance for Planning Case #2020-02 to rezone 3.5 acres of property zoned RR, Rural Residential District, to R-16, High-Density Residential District, and adoption of the Findings of Fact. 2. SITE PLAN APPROVAL The Chanhassen City Council approves a resolution for site plan consisting of a 65,000 square- foot continuing care facility with wetland and front yard setback variances, Planning Case #2020-20, for The Moments of Chanhassen as shown in plans dated January 6, 2020, revised February 18, 2020, and including the attached Findings of Fact and decision, subject to the following conditions: Engineering Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 22 1. A turning movement analysis utilizing the largest anticipated design vehicle shall be provided to ensure there is adequate spacing and no conflicts within the required turnaround, the driveway entrance/exit, and with the traffic control devices located on West 78th Street (raised median, pavement striping, etc.) prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. An updated existing condition survey shall be submitted with revised plans that include the full extents of the construction limits for review and approval by the city prior to recording of the Site Plan Agreement. 3. A minimum five-foot setback shall be adhered to at all times along the wetland buffer. 4. Revisions and updates to the erosion control plans and SWPPP shall be submitted to meet the requirements of the NPDES Construction Permit and Sec. 19-145 of City Code prior to the commencement of grading activities. 5. The applicant shall submit updated plans and modeling to provide for the required abstraction and obtain a RPBCWD permit prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall provide an operation and maintenance plan (O&M) for the private stormwater BMPs. The O&M of private stormwater BMPs is required in perpetuity and must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator, or their designee, to be recorded against the benefiting properties, prior to building permits being issued. 7. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure and submit proof that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, MnDOT, Carver County, RPBCWD, Board of Water and Soil Resources, PCA, etc.). 8. The applicant will be required to enter into a maintenance agreement with the city for the proposed inside drop within the MCES’ manhole prior to issuance of building permits. 9. All proposed sanitary sewer lines will be privately owned and maintained, thus no manholes shall be located within public right-of-way. Environmental Resources 1. The applicant shall remove the existing trees within the grading limits along the west property line. Fire Marshal 1. Show any lower level exit doors and egress paths outdoors away from the building. This type of development cannot omit lower level exit doors. Planning 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 23 2. The applicant must prepare a lighting plan and include photometrics. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The applicant has not submitted a light fixture design. This fixture must be downcast and the light cut off at a 90-degree angle. The City Code requires all fixtures be shielded. 3. Approval of the site plan applications is contingent upon approval of the rezoning and variances. 4. The monument sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area nor be higher than five feet. The sign shall be located 10 feet from the property line. A sign permit is required before construction of the sign. 5. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. 6. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure as the trash. 7. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon consolidation of the two parcels into a single zoning lot. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Ryan: We have approved the motion 5-0 and thank you both for being here, Ms. Wright and Mr. Sarver. I appreciate you being here and Ms. Wright welcome back to Chanhassen. Welcome home. Elizabeth Wright: Thank you so much. I’m very excited. Patrick Sarver: Thank you so much. It’s been a pleasure. Kate Aanenson: I also want to thank Sharmeen Al-Jaff who really, really worked hard on this. This was a very complex project and both the developer and the staff worked really hard to make this happen. There was a lot of work put into it from all the departments including engineering so a lot of work on everybody’s part so very exciting. Mayor Ryan: Well great team effort again so thank you for staff’s hard work and thank you both for your interest in being in Chanhassen. We’re happy to have you. Elizabeth Wright: Thank you. Have a good night. Mayor Ryan: Alright thank you for joining us. Have a good night. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 24 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 20-05: ACCEPT FEASIBILITY REPORT: CALL PUBLIC HEARING. Mayor Ryan: Alright next on our agenda is the 2020 city pavement rehabilitation project. Mr. Howley. Charlie Howley: Thank you Mayor, council. Alright thank you very much. Okay 2020 Street Rehabilitation Project. We refer to this as City Project 20-05. According to our 5 year pavement management plan the 2020 streets considered under this project are highlighted on the map in front of you in the yellow. It amounts to 6 ½ miles, plus or minus of street that we want to rehab in one way, shape or form along with some minor utility improvements while we’re there. We’ll do some spot curb and gutter replacement because this isn’t considered a full reconstruction so we’re not ripping everything out and redoing everything but there will be some curb and gutter replacement. There will be some valve repairs on the watermain. Some I and I improvements for the sanitary sewer and some storm sewer structure and draintile work for the storm sewer. There shouldn’t be any trail or ADA ped ramp improvements necessary as part of this project. The next few slides are kind of zoomed in. Of the 6 neighborhoods there’s a lot of data on these slides. I don’t pretend you to read through it but essentially what it says is highlighted in green would be the roads in question broken out by neighborhood. We show on these slides when the streets were originally constructed and then the individual roadway OCI segments and that is a ranking of what, how good the condition of the pavement is for lack of a better word. So Trappers Pass is a big area. We’ve subdivided it into east and west for the purposes of these slides. The west side was originally constructed 25 to 35 years ago. It was done in phases. It wasn’t done all at once. The east side of Trappers Pass was all about 35 years old. The next neighborhood is Marsh Drive. This was constructed about 34 years ago. An area off of Lake Lucy that was done 28 to 32 years ago. Again done in phases. The Redwing Lane project area is about 40 years old. The Choctaw Circle project area about 42 years old. And then Kurvers Point Road project area about 29 years old. A summary of what we’ve done is we’ve commissioned both a consulting engineer to prepare the feasibility report to date. A geotechnical engineer was hired to do soil sampling and give pavement recommendations based on the underlying soils and the condition of the pavement. The bituminous layer thicknesses and overall pavement depths in conjunction with the existing OCI were used to evaluate and make an engineered determination regarding the appropriate rehabilitation technique for each area. Four of the six areas were recommended to receive a full depth reclamation. You’ll see the term FDR. What full depth reclamation is, is it’s taking whatever pavement, bituminous pavement there currently is. Let’s just say it’s 4 inches and pulverizing it with a big machine completely and also grabbing a portion if not all of the underlying aggregate base and mixing all that up to give you kind of a good new base on which you then would pave new bituminous over the top. And four of the areas listed there, Trappers, Marsh Drive, Lake Lucy and Kurvers would be recommended for a full depth reclamation. The other two areas, Choctaw and Redwing the recommendation is for a traditional mill and overlay where in that method we just basically carve away say half of the bituminous section that’s there and then pave over top of whatever’s underneath it. So it’s a less expensive, less intrusive but a less permanent rehabilitation technique. The watermain Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 25 rehabilitation that we would do would be most of the valves that are in the area are of an age that the bolts on valves were mild steel and thus overtime and the corrosive soils in the Chanhassen area, these bolts can degrade to the point that a valve could blow apart and we get a watermain leak so we want to be proactive. Open cut them and replace the bolts with stainless steel. We don’t necessarily replace the entire valve because the valve itself is operational but we just do the bolt replacement. These areas don’t have any cast iron watermain which is an older pipe material that was used so there shouldn’t be any main pipe replacements on the watermain. And there hasn’t been a history of reoccurring breaks in these areas and so we think the water system itself is generally in good condition. Sanitary sewer. The pipes were televised and analyzed. The data shows that there’s not any major pipe replacements that’s needed nor manhole replacements. But some of the manholes and primarily the castings we may do some spot repairs and replacements to again respond to A and A related items. Inflow and infiltration. Trying to keep the ground water and surface water out of the sanitary sewer. Stormwater. From a dashboard review of emergency overflows for the ponds in these neighborhoods and back yards and side yards and what have you we looked for any potential flooding concerns. None were identified. However during final design we will put boots on the ground and do some more detailed field survey to verify that we don’t have any flooding potential that could be corrected with this project. The streets department staff did review storm manholes and catch basins and identified any repairs needed there. And the project does, the various neighborhoods fall across the city and therefore some of them lands in Minnehaha Creek watershed district and some in Riley-Purgatory but nonetheless the method of rehabilitation does not trigger a need to do additional water quality treatment or rate control because we’re not adding impervious surface. We do need to maintain erosion and sediment control permitting but no BMP’s are required to be added. The budget summary from the CIP for these areas. We’ve got an available budget of about $3 ½ million including the utility funds. Based on the rehabilitation techniques that are recommended. This is how the cost laid out. The total is just over $5 million and so you can see where the scope of this project exceeds our available budget. The reason being that the budget was set where it was, where it was developed solely on doing mill and overlay and not full depth reclaim and certainly not reconstruction. So the more expensive technique is what’s raising the cost to the $5 million. So what we did is we looked at this to see well what, how much can we do to fit within our budget and as of right now, and again I’d like to note these are just feasibility level estimates subject to change of course but 3 of the areas, Trappers Pass, which is the largest area and a high priority. The Choctaw Circle and the Redwing Lane areas, those 3 according to the estimates we have now can fit within our budget and would be the recommended areas to move forward with. The assessments for the 6 different neighborhoods are listed here and the method of rehabilitation, you’ll notice the mill and overlays are obviously less expensive in the assessments than the full depth reclaim. We did want to keep each neighborhood separate when we talked about assessments. We think that’s the fair way to do it based on the scope being different in one neighborhood to the next so we didn’t go down the path of doing one common assessment for all 6 areas. We didn’t think that was the fair to do it. And depending on how the ultimate project moves forward, if it ends up being the 3 projects this year and the other 3 projects get deferred to subsequent years we would only assess the current year projects and we would assess the other ones. So the recommended improvement summary is to, as of right now Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 26 think that we can move forward with the 3 neighborhood areas identified using the recommended rehabilitation techniques. The remaining 3 would get deferred and we would look at our 21 street rehabilitation program. Not only with what we had in the plan but also adding these 3 that were deferred but I’ll say again that once we get through final design and we will move forward with final design for all 6 neighborhoods regardless if we think we’re only going to do 3, our consultant contract is for all 6 and it’s, we can do the final design and just roll them up and put them on the shelf to be used again in the future. But we would like to revisit exactly what’s in the scope upon our final design and if we get a little better numbers based on the estimates and less contingencies and if the bidding climate is different, which is a bit of a wild card with the COVID-19 situation we’re in, and the potential that we might be able to, if we’re close to adding a fourth neighborhood in we could bid one out as an add alternate and maybe if the bids come in good we can do it yeah, but we don’t have to do it but at least we could get a price for it so I’m thinking that might be a good position to be in when we get to the bidding phase of this project. Here’s a proposed schedule. If we move forward tonight and hold the public hearing, that would be at the next council meeting on April 27th. And again that would be for all 6 neighborhoods and we would order the final plans and specifications at that point. We would come back about a month later and approve the plans and specs and authorize ad for bid. We could do a bid opening in the middle of June. We would hold a neighborhood meeting at the end of June. We could award the construction contract and do an assessment hearing in July. Early July. Start construction in late July and be complete by Thanksgiving time. So the proposed motion in front of you would be that the City Council accept the feasibility report for the 2020 city pavement rehabilitation project number 20-05 and call for a public hearing to be held on April 27th, 2020. And I’ll stand for questions. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Mr. Howley. We will follow the same process to, I’ll ask every council member if they have any questions for Mr. Howley. We’ll start with Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: No questions at this time. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Tjornhom? Councilwoman Tjornhom: No questions at this time. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Coleman? Councilwoman Coleman: No questions from me at this time. Mayor Ryan: And Councilman Campion? Councilman Campion: I have one question. Mayor Ryan: Go ahead. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 27 Councilman Campion: So this might be more of a Greg question. Considering the challenges of COVID-19 and you know some economic challenges that residents might be facing, I’m curious if there’s anything we can explore to potentially being somehow more, more lenient with payment terms than usual or something of that nature. I’ve heard some residents made comments to me in that vein just considering the challenges people that are facing anything from furloughed to reduced pay to you know a fully reduced income in the house. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council, we did look at you know potentially delaying it a year and the assessments and you’ve got a couple of things that come into play. These assessments would show up on people’s taxes in 2021 so you’re about a year away from the first payment to being made and delaying it one year in the assessments, we were looking anywhere from a half million dollars to about $750,000 in additional costs in delaying it for one year and, but we can give you more details on that during the assessment hearing process what that true cost is of waiting until 2022 to receive those assessments. And the key thing is, is getting some of the prepaid assessments that lessens the cash for the following year’s work that would be available. Having enough cash in the fund to do the next year’s projects. Those are just some of the things but we can detail those out, itemize them for you during the assessment hearing. Councilman Campion: Okay. Mayor Ryan: Anything further Councilman Campion? Councilman Campion: No I’ll just be interested to hear more details along those lines as this progresses. Mayor Ryan: Okay thank you. I have a question, kind of comment. What, my first question is in terms of the full depth reclamation, what is the then life span of a road versus the mill and overlay? So before you have to do any work on it again. Charlie Howley: Well Madam Mayor, I can give you a general answer knowing that there are specifics involved in construction of streets that have an impact such as subgrade conditions, drain tile. Was the road built appropriately to begin with? And so even a full depth reclaim is considered kind of a maintenance and not a full recon. But I would say traditionally a mill and overlay should buy you about 20 years. So a full depth reclaim could buy you say 30 years. So it’s 50 percent longer would be a rough way to think about it. Mayor Ryan: Right. And the full depth reclaim comes into play because the road is in worst condition or it’s the utilities associated with the roads? Charlie Howley: Yep Madam Mayor, nothing to do with utilities. It has to do with the condition of the existing road and there are some roads out there that are beat up bad enough that you literally can’t peel away a top and have a stable bituminous to pave again. You think of it as a, Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 28 like a graham cracker that you crush and it’s just all splintered and you try to take away some of it and then try to pave on top of it. It just, it’s like paving on top of mush. Mayor Ryan: Right. Charlie Howley: So we looked very closely at the geotechnical corings and we tried to do mill and overlay wherever we could and for example the Redwing Lane is a 40 year old roadway and we still can do a mill and overlay when all the data says that the road has got to get rebuilt after 50 years and you’re supposed to mill and overlay it at 20 years. We got 20 more years out of a road for whatever reason and we’re still able to do a mill and overlay so that’s why I’m hedging my answer about how much more life we’ll get out of it because they’re all speculative to begin with. Mayor Ryan: Right, that makes sense. Charlie Howley: And you can’t know until you get there and analyze it and each road is going to be different but I would just say 50 percent longer in your estimated life with doing an FDR and a mill and overlay. Mayor Ryan: And then we were looking at the 2020 plan, and this all comes back to the kind of internal challenge that I’m having because last year as you know, I know you came in towards the end but we had a lot of conversation around the franchise fee and the justification for doing a franchise fee and I mean I think if I said it once I probably said it a dozen times. We’re going to have this franchise fee. Next year we’re going to be able to do you know 7 miles of road. We’re going to do these mill and overlays because they’re going to, you know we’re going to be able to do more streets. Double the miles. Do more streets and then we’re going to have the extension of these streets because mill and overlays will last 20 years or whatever that timeframe is. And now we’re coming back and we’re only doing half that amount. Little less than half that number of miles. The number of roads and now we’re continuing to bump what we were going to do this year into next year and now I feel like here comes the snowball effect of we’ve implemented this franchise fee yet we’re not, and I understand that what we discovered in the exploration process. That the roads need more work. You know it’s just, it’s a challenge for me because here we’re supposed to be doing these roads. You know the X miles of roads and now we’re, I feel like we’re going back a little bit on that and we’re now pushing it into the year so whatever we bump into next year then whatever’s in next year is getting bumped so I’m challenged with that quite a bit and so my question off of that is, did we look throughout the rest of the city to say okay well maybe, even though we had identified these roads maybe there are other roads that we can take a look at to do mill and overlay so we can you know one, get more miles of road in and two, just looking to Councilman Campion’s point, even though it might not come up on your taxes until 2021, they’re still substantially less of a financial impact to a homeowner than a you know the full depth recon. Recon, am I saying that right? Charlie Howley: Reclamation. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 29 Mayor Ryan: Reclamation. And so you know it’s less of a financial impact maybe on residents. We’re getting more bang for our buck as we had promised our residents so I’m wondering if there’s, if we looked across the city to see if there’s more mill and overlays that we can do. Charlie Howley: Madam Mayor I’ll answer that two ways. Number one, this year’s budget I think is a tiered implementation of the franchise fee where this year we had $2.4 million while we throttle it up because it wasn’t a full year of franchise revenue so next year is kind of the amount we’re projecting as okay this is what we have to work with moving forward and I think it’s $3.6. So the reason why we can’t do as much this year is kind of a result of that but I would say to answer your second question. No we haven’t but I plan to and I know one of the KFS goals was to look at our 5 hear pavement management program and maybe get some more input from the council about how we said what goes in what years and how should we prioritize this so it was just too late in the game for 2020 to look at that before we let the feasibility report and started this ball going. Mayor Ryan: Right. Charlie Howley: So I am going to look at that and I am going to think long and hard about a better plan to potentially get more miles done because we have lots of roads in the city that are perfect candidates for a mill and overlay. Wouldn’t cost as much and then it’s the balancing act. Okay well we could do that but then the really, really bad roads are just sitting there decaying away, sorry and so we have to make the best decision possible so in 2020 I don’t think it was looked at that way but it’s my goal to look at it that way. And also think a little harder about understanding if a mill and overlay is a good candidate for a certain neighborhood rather than just assuming that it is because that’s kind of where we’re at now is we assumed we could do 7 miles of mill and overlay and we can’t. Based on the plan that had 2020 roads so my charge was to follow the 2020 plan because it was already in the plan and I couldn’t change it so I hear what you’re saying and I think for ’21 we absolutely can look at it that way but that’s not how ’20 was looked at unfortunately. Mayor Ryan: Okay well the problem, and one second Mr. Gerhardt. The problem is, is that I know that I said we’re going to be doing 7 miles of roads and we have presentations that said we’re going to be doing X miles of roads and this is what the plan is for next year and I understand plans change and I understand that the feasibility put it out but you know then these are the calls that I get that well now we’re paying a franchise fee. I didn’t know anything about the franchise fee is you know is the other part of it which then we explain that there were plenty of meetings and now you’re not even doing as many roads and now the whole plan that was laid out has changed and yes we change plans and need to be flexible based on what we discovered through the you know the exploratory process but I still challenged by, by what we committed to our residents and what we’re going to get accomplished last year but Mr. Gerhardt you had a comment. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 30 Todd Gerhardt: Just to the point that Charlie, Mr. Howley pointed out is that we didn’t derive full franchise fees until this month and we started the 2020 pavement management study 6 months ago and, and you know and as you go through that process it’s like peeling an onion and when you get to the middle of it like 2 months ago you find out oh my gosh we’re up above our estimate for what we proposed to do and what we can tell the residents is that we are spending every dollar that we are taking in in 2020 to spend on 2020 roads and so we didn’t receive 100 percent of all the franchise fee but we are spending 100 percent of the money brought in so we’re stockpiling it. We’re not holding it to the next year. We’re spending everything that is in that pavement management program this year. Unfortunately 6 months ago we included some reclamation projects in there and which you know you saw the dollar amounts per assessments. It costs more per square mile to do those than a typical mill and overlay and what we know now we wish we would have known 6 months ago and unfortunately we can’t go back and do that and we are doing some projects. You know I can’t honestly sit here and say if we don’t do some of those reclamations now they become a full depth reconstruction in one year because I think a reclamation is almost a full depth reconstruction just short of digging out the sub-base. What we’re doing is taking that whole pavement structure and milling it down to fines and then compacting that down into those poor soils which is causing that reclamation project to be needed and so that’s how our pavement management program works. We’re always 6 months behind in our research when it gets down to the final dollar amount and until you do those feasibility studies you’re working on an unknown for dollar amount. So but to Charlie’s point we will try everything we can to see if there are some other mill and overlays that we can do to do more miles and delay some of the reclamation so we can get more mileage in. But I just want everybody to know that we are spending all of the money that’s in that account and not stockpiling or leaving any for next year. Mayor Ryan: And Mr. Gerhardt you said that, so you will, so at our next meeting you’ll be able to offer or share if there’s other mill and overlays that we can do instead of the recon or reclaim? Todd Gerhardt: Isn’t that what you said? Charlie Howley: Mayor no. Todd Gerhardt: No? Charlie Howley: For ’21. Todd Gerhardt: Oh for ’21. Charlie Howley: Yes. Todd Gerhardt: Okay. Charlie Howley: We can approach it if that’s. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 31 Todd Gerhardt: Yeah I thought you said, I didn’t know how you were going to do it in ’20. Charlie Howley: Yeah no. Todd Gerhardt: But I thought maybe you did some additional research in the interim. But Madam Mayor, council members it takes a feasibility study and do those core samples of those roads to figure out if it needs a mill and overlay or a reclamation or a total reconstruction and we have a 5 year inventory of our roads so we worked on the 2020 roads based on the CPI of those roads. The pavement inventory index and so that’s how these roads rose to the top based on their worst conditions in the city. So I’m sorry I misunderstood Mr. Howley’s comments that he was going to look at additional but for next year maybe we can do more mill and overlays than we were planning I think was his point. Charlie Howley: Yes we would target in our plan update which we plan to update our pavement management plan, the 5 year CIP pavement plan every year and it could change from year to year to year and if the direction or the best intentions of spending our money wisely is to do more mill and overlays, yeah we can massage that plan. But it’s not just drawing lines on a map and saying yep we’re going to do these mill and overlays. There has to be, you have to know that it will work and right now I think unfortunately we made some assumptions that certain roads could be a mill and overlay when they can’t. Mayor Ryan: Right. Charlie Howley: I mean that’s the science of it right there. Mayor Ryan: And my concern is that next year you have no mill and overlays again laid out. There weren’t any mill and overlays for next year. It was all going to be recon so I come back to my concern and while I understand we’re spending all the money on our roads. I’m not suggesting otherwise. It’s just that you know now we keep bumping it back how many we’re doing. You know and that was really the justification behind why we needed this franchise fee and the dollar amount and it was obviously a lengthy conversation so I think we to really look at that 5 year plan a little bit closer and it is a concern. It remains a concern of mine so at the next, could you, I don’t know who is in charge of the power point presentation. Charlie Howley: I got it. Mayor Ryan: But the timeline for that, okay thank you. So for the, on May, no on April 27th when you propose to hold the public hearing will it include only the 3, by approving this tonight you’re saying the only ones that we would even consider are the 3 that you proposed or we would look at all of them and then pick which ones we want to do? Charlie Howley: Yep. We’re bringing all 6 to the next meeting for sure. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 32 Mayor Ryan: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Do you have to designate a certain, which ones or you can designate which ones, well that’s the hearing so it’s when you award bid that you would select which ones you would construct. Charlie Howley: No. The date that we would need to. Todd Gerhardt: Do the bid alternate on. Charlie Howley: Yes. The date where we would need to make those decisions about what projects are in and are going to go out to bid would be internally we would do it like the second week of May in time for the May 25th council meeting because that’s the council meeting that we authorize here’s the project we’re putting out for bid. And in there it will either be 3 or 4 or 4 and add alternate or 3 and an add alternate or all 6 or what have you. So the next meeting we won’t make that decision. We’ll make it in the month of May and formalize that decision on May 25th. Todd Gerhardt: Yep. Mayor Ryan: But the public hearing is going to be for all of them. Not just the 3 that you recommended. You recommend here Redwing Lane, Choctaw Circle and Trappers Pass. You’re going to also include the Lake, I think it was Lake Lucy. What were the other ones? Charlie Howley: Lake Lucy, Marsh Drive and Kurvers Point. Mayor Ryan: And so those are all going to be part of the public hearing next week? Charlie Howley: Yes. Mayor Ryan: Mr. Knutson I felt you wanted to say something. Roger Knutson: At some point you have to be adopting a resolution approving the project and so I suppose you can put some contingencies in that approval. But if at your next meeting you order the project you’ve ordered the project. You order plans and specifications then you’ve decided what project it is subject to whatever conditions you want to put in that approval such as getting reasonable bids. Mayor Ryan: And that would be done at the next meeting? Roger Knutson: Yes. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 33 Mayor Ryan: Okay. Charlie Howley: We could be creative in how we word that approval and ordering of the project yes. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Council I will go down the line again and see if there’s any further questions based on some of the commentary. Councilman McDonald? Councilman McDonald: No. No questions right now, no. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Tjornhom? Councilwoman Tjornhom: No questions. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Coleman? Councilwoman Coleman: No questions at the moment. Mayor Ryan: And Councilman Campion? Councilman Campion: No more questions at this time. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Thank you council. With that I would stand for a motion. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I’ll make the motion. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I make the motion the City Council accepts the feasibility report for the 2020 city pavement rehabilitation project number 20-05 and calls for a public hearing to be held on April 27th, 2020. Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilwoman Coleman: Second. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Coleman with a second. We’ll do a roll call vote. Resolution #2020-24: Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded that the Chanhassen City Council accepts the feasibility report for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20-05 and calls for a public hearing to be held on April 27, 2020. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 34 Mayor Ryan: That motion carries 5-0. Thank you Mr. Howley. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Ryan: Next we have, are there any council presentations? Councilman McDonald? Councilman McDonald: Yes your honor. I’d like to bring up a subject. I attended a meeting today via phone concerning Southwest Transit and also the south, or the Suburban Transit Association. We went through what the impact of the virus COVID-19 has had on public transportation within our areas. The general consensus is everybody’s at about 95 to 97 percent down. Southwest Transit kind of put it this way. Our ridership right now is kind of reduced to a bus taking people down to a Twins game. So that’s one bus completely full and that’s spread out over the entire day so we really don’t have a lot of riders. The majority we do believe are again health care workers or someone who was again considered an essential employee in an essential industry. We’re looking right now the federal government’s going to provide a stimulus to public transit. We’re trying to get what the rules are for that. There seems to be a lot of confusion as to what the money can be used for. One of the problems that we’re running into right now is that transit’s major source of funding has been new car sales and also car rentals all of which at this point as of roughly March the 15th have been going down after it looked as though we were ahead of last year’s projections but everything changed in March. So we’re kind of scrambling as to how we’re going to provide public transit going forward. At this point we’re all kind of in the dark because we don’t know how long the shut down’s are going to last. We don’t know what the impact is going to be. Currently Southwest in order to keep people employed we have teamed up with PROP for Eden Prairie, Second Hand Harvest I believe for Chanhassen and Chaska and what we’re doing is we are delivering groceries and food to individuals. We’re also as far as the Prime is concerned at this point we’re not really collecting fees and we’re not the only one. It looks like public transit throughout the country has gone away from collecting fees in order to reduce the interaction of riders with drivers and the handling of money and all of those things. We’re also at this point looking at how are things going to change with public transit going forward. There’s a lot of ideas out there. Right now at least Southwest we haven’t settled on a direct way to go but if the impact within our community is that right now public transit is really kind of up in the air. We don’t know what’s going to happen. Like I say ridership is down. We’re trying to maintain as many drivers as we possibly can so that when this gets turned around we’re not suddenly caught with a shortage of drivers because they’ve moved onto something else. So it’s a very challenging time for all of public transit at this point. In order to you know continue to provide services to our communities and to continue to make transit a viable component within the communities. As things begin to shake out more in the future I’ll make further reports to council but at this point we’re still in business. We’re trying to adopt to all the new ways and all the new norms at this point and there’ll be further changes being made. The other thing that happened back in March is that the station in Eden Prairie, Southwest Station was demolished so now it’s set up for construction of the light rail which is continuing to go forward. That has not been impacted at all by any of this so at some point light rail will be coming to Eden Prairie. But for right now I just want everybody to Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 35 know that yeah these are very difficult times I think for public transit. We’re trying to find our way through it and I’ll report on more as I know more. Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Councilman McDonald and would like to extend appreciation for your hard work in working with them and obviously Len I know he’s been talking to as many people as possible and I know Senator Osmek is also advocating on his behalf and have been in touch with, I’ve been in touch with him trying to you know do what we can to make sure that those federal dollars come through Met Council and get in the right hands so appreciate your advocacy on behalf of Southwest Transit. I’d also like to say how much we appreciate the service to the community particularly with Second Harvest Food Shelf and PROP which also serves, serves Eden Prairie but does serve Chanhassen residents as well and that partnership I know has proved to be invaluable to our residents that really need those groceries delivered so for them to utilize you know their buses and you know that service to provide for our residences is really remarkable and just please again extend our appreciation to Len on behalf of the City so thank you for that report Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: You’re welcome. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Tjornhom? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Nothing. Mayor Ryan: Councilwoman Coleman? Councilwoman Coleman: I just wanted to briefly once again say thank you to all of our medical professionals, first responders and essential employees that are out there working so hard for all of us during this time. That’s just all I wanted to say really quick. Mayor Ryan: Perfect, thank you very much Councilwoman. Councilman Campion. Councilman Campion: No reports. Mayor Ryan: Could you say that one more time please? Councilman Campion: Sorry about that. No reports. Mayor Ryan: Okay thank you. I thought that’s what you said but I just wanted to clarify. And I don’t have anything to report either. Again before we just finalize through the administration and correspondence discussion. Again just our appreciation for your patience with all of us as we navigate these new waters and thanks for the residents that are doing the sidewalk chalk and putting things up in their neighborhood and reaching out to each other and we heard from our Jill Sinclair that folks are out on the trails picking up trash and everybody’s just doing what they can Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 36 to look out for each other and take care of each other in these tough times so we will get through it together and really appreciate everybody’s patience during this time so thank you for that. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Ryan: Anything in the Administrative Presentations? Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council I have two items. I definitely want to thank Rick and Matt in putting on this Zoom meeting and the council for being receptive to participating in the Zoom meeting. I think as this being our first live broadcast I think you did a fantastic job. I also would like to thank Kim for her help and Kate in getting some of the logistics laid out so we could get through the agendas and so big thank you to all of staff that’s been involved in this. And also I’d like everybody to know that this is, we’re getting into that time of season for severe weather and this week is Severe Weather Awareness and especially on Thursday you’re going to hear two times on Thursday the tornado warning sirens go off. One at 1:45 p.m. and one at 6:45 p.m. so don’t be alarmed. Those are planned sirens to go off at those times and we are also looking at other severe weather, thunderstorms, lightning, hail, extreme heat, some floods and insuring that all our sirens are working properly so alerts and warnings as a part of that Severe Weather Awareness Week so that’s it. Mayor Ryan: Wonderful, thank you Mr. Gerhardt. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. Mayor Ryan: Anything on the correspondence discussion? I’ll take that as a no. Did you have, want it? No. Todd Gerhardt: Oh no. Unless anybody has questions on fire department or law enforcement updates due to this Zoom meeting we decided to shorten the meeting by just putting the data in the packet. Mayor Ryan: Perfect thank you Mr. Gerhardt. With that I would stand for a motion to adjourn. Councilman Campion: So moved. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Councilman Campion. Is there a second? Councilman McDonald: Second. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Councilman McDonald. And please state yes or no. Chanhassen City Council – April 13, 2020 37 Councilman Campion moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES APRIL 13, 2020 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Kate Aanenson, Charlie Howley, and Roger Knutson PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Ryan outlined the guidelines that will be used for the virtual Zoom council meeting. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated March 9, 2020 2. Approve Special City Council Minutes dated March 20, 2020 3. Resolution #2020-19: Municipal State Aid Street Funds Advance 4. Approve Arbor Day Poster Contest Winners 5. Resolution #2020-20: Approve Consultant Agreement for Materials Testing on City Project 20-02, Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation 6. Approve Radio Replacements for Utility Billing System 7. Resolution #2020-21: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20-03: Accept Feasibility Study; Call Public Hearing 8. Resolution #2020-22: Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2020 Sealcoat Project 9. Approve Purchase, Park Equipment Replacement Schedule for Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach 10. Approve City of Chanhassen Temporary Policies and Guidance Response to COVID-19 Pandemic City Council Summary – April 13, 2020 2 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. APPROVE AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT – 195 WEST 79TH STREET. Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item. Councilman McDonald asked for clarification of what was being request by the applicant. The applicant Matthew Rosati explained the need for a 3 month extension to the agreement. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded that the City Council approve an amendment to the Option Agreement for 3 months to September 10, 2020. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. AUTHORIZE REFUND OF A PORTION OF ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FEES; APPROVE 2020 LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS. Todd Gerhardt presented the staff report on this item. Councilwoman Coleman asked for clarification on how this would affect restaurants when the Governor allows beer and wine sales for restaurants providing carry out. Resolution #2020-23: Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman McDonald seconded that the City Council adopts the resolution authorizing a refund of a portion of on-sale liquor licensing fees and approves the 2020 liquor license renewals as listed on the attached sheet contingent upon receipt of all necessary documentation and satisfactory background investigations of new operating managers. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. APPROVE A REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF WEST 78TH STREET AND WEST OF LAKE ANN PARK FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (RR) TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-16), LOT CONSOLIDATION AND SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 48 UNIT CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT FACILITY. Kate Aanenson presented the staff report and Planning Commission update on this item. The applicant Elizabeth Wright described their vision for developing The Moments in Chanhassen and the work that’s been done to design the building. Councilwoman Coleman asked staff to clarify the concerns expressed at the Planning Commission meeting. Mayor Ryan asked for clarification of the improvements made to the landscaping plan, parking lot design and comments from the watershed district regarding runoff. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the Chanhassen City Council approves an Ordinance rezoning property from Rural Residential District to High City Council Summary – April 13, 2020 3 Density Residential District (R-16), lot consolidation and approve a resolution for site plan review with variances for the construction of a 48-unit continuing care retirement facility (The Moments of Chanhassen), as shown in plans dated February 18, 2020, subject to the following conditions of approval and adopts the findings of fact and decision: 1. REZONING The City Council approves an Ordinance for Planning Case #2020-02 to rezone 3.5 acres of property zoned RR, Rural Residential District, to R-16, High-Density Residential District, and adoption of the Findings of Fact. 2. SITE PLAN APPROVAL Resolution #2020-25: The Chanhassen City Council approves a resolution for site plan consisting of a 65,000 square-foot continuing care facility with wetland and front yard setback variances, Planning Case #2020-20, for The Moments of Chanhassen as shown in plans dated January 6, 2020, revised February 18, 2020, and including the attached Findings of Fact and decision, subject to the following conditions: Engineering 1. A turning movement analysis utilizing the largest anticipated design vehicle shall be provided to ensure there is adequate spacing and no conflicts within the required turnaround, the driveway entrance/exit, and with the traffic control devices located on West 78th Street (raised median, pavement striping, etc.) prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. An updated existing condition survey shall be submitted with revised plans that include the full extents of the construction limits for review and approval by the city prior to recording of the Site Plan Agreement. 3. A minimum five-foot setback shall be adhered to at all times along the wetland buffer. 4. Revisions and updates to the erosion control plans and SWPPP shall be submitted to meet the requirements of the NPDES Construction Permit and Sec. 19-145 of City Code prior to the commencement of grading activities. 5. The applicant shall submit updated plans and modeling to provide for the required abstraction and obtain a RPBCWD permit prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall provide an operation and maintenance plan (O&M) for the private stormwater BMPs. The O&M of private stormwater BMPs is required in perpetuity and must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator, or their designee, to be recorded against the benefiting properties, prior to building permits being issued. City Council Summary – April 13, 2020 4 7. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure and submit proof that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, MnDOT, Carver County, RPBCWD, Board of Water and Soil Resources, PCA, etc.). 8. The applicant will be required to enter into a maintenance agreement with the city for the proposed inside drop within the MCES’ manhole prior to issuance of building permits. 9. All proposed sanitary sewer lines will be privately owned and maintained, thus no manholes shall be located within public right-of-way. Environmental Resources 1. The applicant shall remove the existing trees within the grading limits along the west property line. Fire Marshal 1. Show any lower level exit doors and egress paths outdoors away from the building. This type of development cannot omit lower level exit doors. Planning 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 2. The applicant must prepare a lighting plan and include photometrics. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The applicant has not submitted a light fixture design. This fixture must be downcast and the light cut off at a 90-degree angle. The City Code requires all fixtures be shielded. 3. Approval of the site plan applications is contingent upon approval of the rezoning and variances. 4. The monument sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area nor be higher than five feet. The sign shall be located 10 feet from the property line. A sign permit is required before construction of the sign. 5. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. 6. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure as the trash. 7. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon consolidation of the two parcels into a single zoning lot. City Council Summary – April 13, 2020 5 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 20-05: ACCEPT FEASIBILITY REPORT: CALL PUBLIC HEARING. Charlie Howley presented the staff report on this item. Councilman Campion asked if there was anything that could be done to help residents with assessments due circumstances associated with COVID-19 and the fact that some people have reduced or no household income. Mayor Ryan asked about the life span of a road doing full depth reclamation versus mill and overlay, and if staff had looked across the city to see if there’s more mill and overlays that can be done. After clarification of the schedule moving forward and what’s being approved, the following motion was made. Resolution #2020-24: Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded that the Chanhassen City Council accepts the feasibility report for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20-05 and calls for a public hearing to be held on April 27, 2020. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. Councilman McDonald provided an update on the Suburban Transit Association meeting he attended via telephone concerning the impact the COVID-19 virus has had on public transportation. Councilwoman Coleman thanked medical professionals, first responders and essential employees who are out working so hard for during this time. Mayor Ryan thanked everybody for their patience during this trying time. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Todd Gerhardt thanked all city staff members who helped with getting this Zoom meeting put together, and provided an update on activities involved with Severe Weather Awareness Week. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. Todd Gerhardt noted that the updates from the fire department and law enforcement were included in the correspondence packet. Councilman Campion moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 27, 2020 Subject Resolution 2020XX: Proclaiming May 2 as Arbor Day Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.2. Prepared By Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resource Specialist File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council adopts a resolution proclaiming May 2, 2020 as Chanhassen Arbor Day, and the month of May as Arbor Month." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND Chanhassen’s Arbor Day celebration will not be taking place this year due to Covid19 Stay at Home orders. However, the city will still be honoring the day by planting trees in Meadow Green Park using a contractor to install the trees. The trees will help create more canopy cover in the park and diversify the tree species present. The park had a number of young ash trees, too small to merit treatment, that will be removed this year. These new plantings will help replace those trees, refresh the park and add future shade and beauty. This year marks a milestone for many activities related to Arbor Day. In 2020, the City of Chanhassen will have celebrated Arbor Day for the 25th year! It will be the 20th year that the city has sponsored a poster contest and the 10th year that an organized tree planting has taken place in a city park in honor of Arbor Day. City staff and the Environmental Commission had been planning a celebration event to recognize these milestones, but will postpone those activities until next year. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution proclaiming May 2, 2020 as Chanhassen Arbor Day and the month of May as Arbor Month. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: April 27, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MAY 2 AS ARBOR DAY WHEREAS, climate change is a complex problem that impacts all Minnesotans and our ability to thrive; and WHEREAS, the health and longevity of Minnesota’s trees are being affected by changing temperatures and precipitation, more extreme weather events, and increasing pressure from pests, diseases, and invasive species; and WHEREAS, Minnesota is at risk to lose over one billion ash trees due to emerald ash borer, potentially increasing CO2 emissions and flooding; and WHEREAS, a healthy tree canopy decreases temperatures along streets providing cooler spaces in the summertime for recreation and commerce; and WHEREAS, about three-quarters of Minnesotans get their drinking water from the forested parts of the state; and WHEREAS, shade from trees protects people from exposure to the sun’s UV rays and diminishes heat-related illness; and WHEREAS, trees reduce stormwater runoff and act as a filter, preventing sediments and pollutants from washing into waterways; and WHEREAS, trees capture carbon from the atmosphere and store it in their trunks, roots, and soil; and WHEREAS, Minnesotans can help build resilient communities and reduce the negative impacts of climate change One Tree at a Time by planting and caring for trees and by using wood products to store carbon into the future. NOW THEREFORE, I, Elise Ryan, Mayor of Chanhassen, do hereby proclaim Saturday, May 2, 2020 as ARBOR DAY, and the month of May, 2020 as ARBOR MONTH in Chanhassen. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 27th day of April, 2020. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT g:\admin\resol\2020\04-27-2020\arbor day.docx CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 27, 2020 Subject Release of Settlement Agreement pertaining to RPBCWD Parcel swap for CSAH 101 Improvements Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.3. Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer File No: ENG 1408 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the release of an existing Settlement Agreement attached to the property owned by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District that the City is acquiring as part of the CSAH 101 Improvement Project.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The title commitment for the property that the City is acquiring a portion of from the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District indicates that there was a Settlement Agreement between the City and the previous owner of the property (Jerome Koenke) regarding his use of the property. The Agreement is from 1983 and a copy is attached. The RPBCWD obtained the property in 1994 and there are no improvements on the land. Any building that was constructed as a result of the Agreement is no longer in place. The property currently is part of the larger Hess Farm Preserve. Based on the City Attorney's review, it make sense for the City to release the Agreement as it would keep the title to the property clean. The Agreement would remain in force, it just wouldn’t show up on the property’s records. Upon approval by the City, the title company will remove it as an exception to the City’s title policy for the property. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval for the release of the Settlement Agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Original Settlement Agreement Release Parcel Map RELEASE OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THE UNDERSIGNED hereby releases and terminates the Settlement Agreement dated February 18, 1983, filed April 7, 1983, as Document No. 58993, in the recorder’s office of Carver County, Minnesota by and between City of Chanhassen, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota and Jerome A. Koenke. City of Chanhassen By: Elise Ryan Its: Mayor By: Todd Gerhardt Its: City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me the ___ day of April, 2020, by Elise Ryan and Todd Gerhardt, the Mayor and City Manager respectively of the City of Chanhassen, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public This instrument was drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 200 South 6th Street, Suite 470 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612-337-9300 635652v2CH135-61 4 EXHIBIT A Depiction of the Portion of the District Property to Which the Right of Entry Applies CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 27, 2020 Subject Award Bids for Chanhassen City Hall Reception Area Remodeling Project Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.4. Prepared By Todd Gerhardt, City Manager File No: ADM330 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council awards a bid for construction of the Chanhassen City Hall Reception Area Remodeling Project to Gardner Builders in the amount of $30,581, awards the office furniture bid portion to Intereum in the amount of $29,926.17, and approves a 10% contingency fee of $6,000 for a total award amount of $66,507.17." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The entryway and main front reception area of City Hall is in need of security improvements for employee safety. The reconfiguration will also provide better customer service with a designated service window, as well as meet ADA requirements. DISCUSSION Bids for demolition, construction, and electrical were solicited from Gardner Builders and Engelsma Construction, Inc. A bid for the furniture portion of the project was received from Intereum in the amount of $29,926.17 (state negotiated contract). Contractor Gardner Builders*Engelsma Construction, Inc. Bid Amount $30,581.00 $40,118.00 Intereum Furniture Bid (State Contract)$29,926.17 $29,926.17 Subtotal $60,507.17 $70,044.17 10% Contingency $6,000.00 $7,000.00 TOTAL $66,507.17 $77,044.17 *Low bidder RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council award the bid from Gardner Builders in the amount of $30,581, award the office furniture bid portion to Intereum in the amount of $29,926.17, and approve a 10% contingency fee of $6,000 for a total award amount of $66,507.17 to complete the Chanhassen City Hall Reception Area Remodeling CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectAward Bids for Chanhassen City Hall Reception Area Remodeling ProjectSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.4.Prepared By Todd Gerhardt, City Manager File No: ADM330PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council awards a bid for construction of the Chanhassen City Hall Reception Area Remodeling Project toGardner Builders in the amount of $30,581, awards the office furniture bid portion to Intereum in the amount of$29,926.17, and approves a 10% contingency fee of $6,000 for a total award amount of $66,507.17."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThe entryway and main front reception area of City Hall is in need of security improvements for employee safety. Thereconfiguration will also provide better customer service with a designated service window, as well as meet ADArequirements.DISCUSSIONBids for demolition, construction, and electrical were solicited from Gardner Builders and Engelsma Construction,Inc. A bid for the furniture portion of the project was received from Intereum in the amount of $29,926.17 (statenegotiated contract).Contractor Gardner Builders*Engelsma Construction, Inc.Bid Amount $30,581.00 $40,118.00Intereum Furniture Bid (State Contract)$29,926.17 $29,926.17Subtotal$60,507.17 $70,044.1710% Contingency $6,000.00 $7,000.00TOTAL$66,507.17 $77,044.17*Low bidderRECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends that the City Council award the bid from Gardner Builders in the amount of $30,581, award the office furniture bid portion to Intereum in the amount of $29,926.17, and approve a 10% contingency fee of $6,000 for a total award amount of $66,507.17 to complete the Chanhassen City Hall Reception Area Remodeling Project in calendar year 2020. ATTACHMENTS: Gardner Builders Quote Engelsma Construction, Inc. Quote Intereum Quote Furniture Layout CIP Schedule Gardner Builders Contract GARDNER BUII,DERS Februory 19, 2020 730 Second Avenue South Suite I 233 Minneopolis, MN 55402 612-326-6377Joke Foster City of Chonhossen 7700 Morket Blvd Chonhossen. MN 5531 7 Re: Chonhossen City Holl 7700 Moket Blvd - Chonhossen Deor Mr. Foster. Thonk you for the opportunity to provide pricing for lhe Chonhossen City Holl projecl. Our pricing is os follows Iolol Prop6ot 930,581 ALTFRNATFS: CI ARIFICATIC)NS. No. l: All work lo be completed during normol business hours unless otherwise noted. No. 2: All Low Voltoge work by others unless noted otherwise (doto/phone, A/V, elc.) No. 3: lncludes no work for furnifure. existng or new. No. 4: Does nol include seMr'er or woter occess chorges. No. 5: All hozordous obotement or remediolion is excluded. No. 6: Costs for speciol inspeclions excluded. No. 7: Proposol bosed on plons issued by lntereum doled October 17 , 2019. No. 8: Does noi include considerolion for potenliol oddilionol costs due lo toriffs unless otherwise noted. Thonk you for lhe opportunity to provide this pricing. Feel free to contoct our office if you hove ony queslions or comrnents. Respectfully, Gordner Builders --) Derek Wonen dere oardner-build Cell (612) 401-4325 ers. co m 1ot4 )te-\,J Proiecl: Chonhossen CltY Hol! locqllon:7700 Morket Blvd - Chonhossen USF: 1,000 Dole: Februory 1?,2020 e GARDNER Blimoted Tolol Cost Notes 0t - Genarol Requiremenls Supervision $4.2OO Generol Conditiors $9r2 Sofety, d rs, misc. corsumobles, elc Allowonces $0 Owner ncy $0 Preconstruclion $o Photo / Video Monitoring ond Docurnenlotion $0 Testing ond lnspe $0 Desi Fees $0 TOTAT $5,r r 2 02 - Exisling Cottditions Sile Pre orotion $4,600 Dust control ond doily cleon. SL,rveys $0 Demolition $3,r 20 Remove wolls, door pockoge, millwork, coot rod/shelf, flooring, ond bose. Existing borrowed lites ond door behind receplion lo remoin. Re movol o nd D isposol of Co nt omr note d Soi ls $0 Asbedos Remediqlion $0 TOTAI.$7]20 03 - Concrele TOTAT $o 04 - Mo3orYy IOIAI.$0 05 - Melols TOTAT $0 06 - wood, Plosllcs, qnd Co Archilecturol Woodwork Restorolion $0 Cor ntry $0 $0 Architeclurol woodwork - Moteriols $0 Reception desk by lntereum. Assumes existing wood ceiling to rernoin. Architecturol woodwork - lnstoll $r ,350 lnstoll newreused doorsond hordwore. Assumes existing opening iswide enoughtor r€wdoor pockoge ond to meei code. Plostic Fobricotions $0 TOTAT $r,3s0 07 - Thermol ond Moisl('e Plolecllon IOTAI.$0 2of4 8U'tDERS Services wood Froming Project: Chonhossen City Holl locotion:77OO Morkel Blvd - Chonhossen USF: 1,000 Dote: Februory 19,2020 e GARDNER BU IL D E F S Estimoted TotolCost 08 - Openings Doors ond Fromes $r,7r0 Furnish (I ) door, frome, ond hordwore. lncludes electric strikes for cord reoders by others. One of the new doors shown behind reception is no longer port of the scope of work per site visit, not included. All other existing doors to be reused. Speciolty Doors ond Fromes $o Access Doors ond Ponels $o Coiling Doors ond Grilles $o Folding Doors ond Grilles $o Windows $0 Door Hordwore $o Glozing $0 Glozing Surfoce Films $0 Louvers $0 IOTAT $r,7r 0 09 - Fnishes Ploster ond Gypsum Boord $s,3es Build newwolls - insuloted. Potch demo scors. Tope ond sond to level 4 finish. Squore off columns, moy be slightly different thon plon to ovoid potching wood ceiling. Exisling heoder/soffil behind reception to remoin. WollPrep $o Tiling $r,500 Allowonce to potch quorry tile to motch eisting os close os posible. Acousticol Ceilings $0 Asumes existing wood ceiling to remoin. Moy need lo slightly modify howwe ore squoring off the columns to ovoid hoving to potch the wood ceiling per site visit. Wood $0 Flooring $2,s00 Allowonce for newcorpet ond bose behind reception desk. Ierrozzo $0 FI $o Acces Floori $o Acoustic Treotment $0 Pointing ond Cooting $r,560 Point newond offected wolls. poinl HM door fromes. IOTAT $ r 0,955 3 of 4 Notes Projecl: Chonhossen CitY Holl locotion: 77OO Morkel Blvd' Chonhossen USF: 1,000 Dote: Februory 19,2020 d GARDNER BUILDERS Estimoted TotolCost Notes l0-iollies IOIAT $0 ll - IOTAL $0 12- IOTAT $0 13-Conslrucllon IOTAT $0 14- IOTAT $0 21,212&23-Mechonicol Fire n $0 Nol included per site visit. Plumbi $0 Ventil ond A $0 HVAC to remoin os is. IOTAL $0 26.27&28-Electricol Electricol $0 onstruction. RemoveDisconnect electricol for c (2) plug mold receplocleswhere bose cobinets ore being removed. Furnish ond instoll bose feed for new recePtion desk. Communicotions $0 Not included. Audio-Video Communicotions $0 Electronic ond Fire Delection ond Alorm $0 Nol included.security vendor $0 TOTAL 31,32&33-ond Utilttles $0 IOTAT $0 Finol Cleon $3s0 lnsuonce ond Permlls Generol lnsuronce $362 Subcontroctor Defoult lnsuronce Buildi Permit $0 $r,02r Does not include SAC/WAC ies $0 Controctor $0 Conlroclor Fee $2,00r IOIAL $30,s81 4of4 Existing tilGtl$iltl coNlTRucTtoN, rNc. Chanhassen City Hatl 450 s6f 2.27.2020 sEc DESCRIPTION OF WORX TOTAL GENERAL REQUIRMENTS 1000 Dumpster 1000 Temp Barrlers SUBSTRUCTURE 2050 Demolition INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION $9,150 1000 8100 9250 9680 9900 Final Clean Doors/Frames & Hardware Gypsum Wall Systoms Flooring Painting / Wall Coverlng MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL $675 $2,985 $7,815 $2,910 $2,525 16000 Electrical $5,330 SUBTOTAL SALES TAX PERMITS & FEES GENERAL CONDITIONS SAC / WAC CHARGES LtABtL|TY TNSURANCE (.7%) PAYMENT & PERFORMANCE BONDS SUBTOTAL 220't0 GoNTRACTOR'S FEE (s%) CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $32,690 INCLUDED Ntc $5,289 By Others $229 Ntc $38,208 $1 ,910 II - $550 $750 -dJl8-. Qualifications: All work to be completed during normal business hours' We exclude any SAC or WAC charges & Permit Costs by Others. We exclude the removal of any hazardous waste material. Low Voltage cabling & Secutiry work not included. To be hired by owner. Furnish & Install of Owner Furniture Not included. We exlude any Sprinkler System work. We exclude any Architecture or Engineering Fees. We Exclude any work on lobby area tile flooring. We exclude any moving of light fixtures. We have included painting on new gypsum walls & door frames only. Proposal Corporate 9800 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763-417-3300 www.intereum.com Quote/Order 59066 Project # Date 04/20/2020 Quote Expiration 05/20/2020 Payment Terms 50% DOWN PAYMENT NET 15 Page 1 of 14 T O City Hall 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 ATTN: Todd Gerhardt Email: tgerhardt@ci.chanhassen.mn.us S H I P T O City Hall 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 ATTN: Todd Gerhardt Email: tgerhardt@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Project Description: Communications - New Secure Entry Project Team: Sales, Kimberly Kirkeide, kkirkeide@intereum.com, 612-413-1478 Sales, Kim Sorenson, ksorenson@intereum.com, 612-272-6553 Designer, Megan Uelner, muelner@intereum.com, 763-417-3387 Project Manager, Heather Loveland, hloveland@intereum.com, 763-417-3431 Account Coordinator, Melissa Phommasouvanh, mPhommasouvanh@intereum.com, 763-417-3498 Group Quantity Description Unit Extended Amount Installation services 1.0 Labor to receive, deliver and install during regular business hours. $1,934.36 $1,934.36 Individual Items $25,943.19 Line Quantity Catalog Number/Description Unit Extended Amount 1 30.00 Intereum Technical Services TECHNICAL SERVICES Design and Technical Services $75.00 $2,250.00 5 4.00 Herman Miller Y7216.10--XF +Paper Tray 10W XF:+frosted $18.86 $75.44 6 2.00 Herman Miller Y7218.--XF +Diagonal Tray XF:+frosted $29.90 $59.80 7 20.00 Intereum Technical Services TECH Designer Technical Services $75.00 $1,500.00 8 4.00 Herman Miller E1420V.1624K--LBC-LBC $62.06 $248.24 Proposal Corporate 9800 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763-417-3300 www.intereum.com Quote/Order 59066 Project # Date 04/20/2020 Quote Expiration 05/20/2020 Payment Terms 50% DOWN PAYMENT NET 15 Page 2 of 14 @Vary Easy Face Tile,Lam w/Sq-Edge and Horizontal Grain,16H 24W LBC:+walnut on ash LBC:+walnut on ash Tag: FR16 9 12.00 Herman Miller E1420V.1630K--LBC-LBC Vary Easy Face Tile, 16" high, 30" wide, laminate with squared edge and horizontal grain LBC:walnut on ash LBC:walnut on ash Tag: FR16 $66.70 $800.40 10 5.00 Herman Miller E1420V.1636K--LBC-LBC @Vary Easy Face Tile,Lam w/Sq-Edge and Horizontal Grain,16H 36W LBC:+walnut on ash LBC:+walnut on ash Tag: FR16 $73.95 $369.75 11 10.00 Herman Miller E1420V.1642K--LBC-LBC @Vary Easy Face Tile,Lam w/Sq-Edge and Horizontal Grain,16H 42W LBC:+walnut on ash LBC:+walnut on ash Tag: FR16 $82.07 $820.70 12 1.00 Herman Miller E1420V.0836K--LBC-LBC Vary Easy Face Tile, 8" high, 36" wide, laminate with squared edge and horizontal grain LBC:walnut on ash LBC:walnut on ash Tag: FR08 $56.84 $56.84 13 11.00 Herman Miller E1120.86 +Draw Rod 86H $12.47 $137.17 14 1.00 Herman Miller $62.93 $62.93 Proposal Corporate 9800 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763-417-3300 www.intereum.com Quote/Order 59066 Project # Date 04/20/2020 Quote Expiration 05/20/2020 Payment Terms 50% DOWN PAYMENT NET 15 Page 3 of 14 E1322.06E +Power Entry,Ext. Dir Con 4-Circ,6Ft L 15 3.00 Herman Miller E1250.86S--WL +Fin End,Std 86H WL:+sandstone $35.67 $107.01 16 1.00 Herman Miller E1425.1624--WL +Tile,Rail 16H 24W WL:+sandstone Tag: R16 $62.35 $62.35 17 1.00 Herman Miller E1425.1630--WL +Tile,Rail 16H 30W WL:+sandstone Tag: R16 $69.31 $69.31 18 1.00 Herman Miller E1210.86--WL +Wall Start 86H WL:+sandstone $77.72 $77.72 19 2.00 Herman Miller E1311.A--WL +15 Amp Receptacle 4 Circuit, Duplex, Circuit A 6/Pkg WL:+sandstone $71.05 $142.10 20 1.00 Herman Miller E1311.B--WL +15 Amp Receptacle 4 Circuit, Duplex, Circuit B 6/Pkg WL:+sandstone $71.05 $71.05 21 5.00 Herman Miller E2393.24L--WL-SM +Support,Work Surf 24D (for 20" or 24" Deep surfaces) Left WL:+sandstone SM:+on module $12.47 $62.35 22 6.00 Herman Miller E2393.24R--WL-SM $12.47 $74.82 Proposal Corporate 9800 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763-417-3300 www.intereum.com Quote/Order 59066 Project # Date 04/20/2020 Quote Expiration 05/20/2020 Payment Terms 50% DOWN PAYMENT NET 15 Page 4 of 14 +Support,Work Surf 24D (for 20" or 24" Deep surfaces) Right WL:+sandstone SM:+on module 23 10.00 Herman Miller E1420.1630F--8R-17 +Tile,Face Fabric 16H 30W 8R:+twist-Pr Cat 2 17:+twist birch Tag: FF16 $36.54 $365.40 24 1.00 Herman Miller EWS10.2424LF--LBQ-LBQ +Rect Surf,Sq-Edge,Lam Top/TP Edge,Frame att 24D 24W LBQ:+white twill LBQ:+white twill Tag: 24/30 $58.58 $58.58 25 5.00 Herman Miller E1420.1636F--8R-17 +Tile,Face Fabric 16H 36W 8R:+twist-Pr Cat 2 17:+twist birch Tag: FF16 $40.31 $201.55 26 26.00 Herman Miller E1420.1642F--8R-17 +Tile,Face Fabric 16H 42W 8R:+twist-Pr Cat 2 17:+twist birch Tag: FF16 $42.63 $1,108.38 27 2.00 Herman Miller E1415.1624T--WL-TR +Tile,Window Top 16H 24W WL:+sandstone TR:+clear Tag: GT16 $51.33 $102.66 28 4.00 Herman Miller E1415.1642M--WL-TR $66.41 $265.64 Proposal Corporate 9800 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763-417-3300 www.intereum.com Quote/Order 59066 Project # Date 04/20/2020 Quote Expiration 05/20/2020 Payment Terms 50% DOWN PAYMENT NET 15 Page 5 of 14 +Tile,Window Mid/Bot 16H 42W WL:+sandstone TR:+clear Tag: GM16 29 1.00 Herman Miller EWS10.2430LF--LBQ-LBQ +Rect Surf,Sq-Edge,Lam Top/TP Edge,Frame att 24D 30W LBQ:+white twill LBQ:+white twill Tag: 24/30 $66.99 $66.99 30 2.00 Herman Miller E2396.--WL-SM +Peninsula Support Bracket WL:+sandstone SM:+on module Tag: SHOP $64.67 $129.34 31 1.00 Herman Miller E1109.8624G--WL-WL +Frame,Pwr 4-Circ W/Com Pt Lc 86H 24W WL:+sandstone WL:+sandstone Tag: 86/24J $243.60 $243.60 32 10.00 Herman Miller E1415.1642T--WL-TR +Tile,Window Top 16H 42W WL:+sandstone TR:+clear Tag: GT16 $69.02 $690.20 33 1.00 Herman Miller E1420.0836F--8R-17 +Tile,Face Fabric 08H 36W 8R:+twist-Pr Cat 2 17:+twist birch Tag: FF08 $29.00 $29.00 34 1.00 Herman Miller E2812.36LN--LBQ-LBQ $93.96 $93.96 Proposal Corporate 9800 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763-417-3300 www.intereum.com Quote/Order 59066 Project # Date 04/20/2020 Quote Expiration 05/20/2020 Payment Terms 50% DOWN PAYMENT NET 15 Page 6 of 14 +Trans Surf,Sq-Edge Rect End, Lam Top/TP Edge,No Cutout 36W LBQ:+white twill LBQ:+white twill Tag: 24/30 SHOP 35 1.00 Herman Miller EWS10.2472LF--LBQ-28 +Rect Surf,Sq-Edge,Lam Top/TP Edge,Frame att 24D 72W LBQ:+white twill 28:+canyon Tag: 24/48 $147.32 $147.32 36 5.00 Herman Miller E1109.8630G--WL-WL +Frame,Pwr 4-Circ W/Com Pt Lc 86H 30W WL:+sandstone WL:+sandstone Tag: 86/30G $256.65 $1,283.25 37 2.00 Herman Miller E1109.8636G--WL-WL +Frame,Pwr 4-Circ W/Com Pt Lc 86H 36W WL:+sandstone WL:+sandstone Tag: 86/36G $271.73 $543.46 38 5.00 Herman Miller E1109.8642G--WL-WL +Frame,Pwr 4-Circ W/Com Pt Lc 86H 42W WL:+sandstone WL:+sandstone Tag: 86/42G $285.65 $1,428.25 39 1.00 Herman Miller EWS10.2436LF--LBQ-LBQ +Rect Surf,Sq-Edge,Lam Top/TP Edge,Frame att 24D 36W LBQ:+white twill LBQ:+white twill Tag: 24/30 $76.85 $76.85 Proposal Corporate 9800 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763-417-3300 www.intereum.com Quote/Order 59066 Project # Date 04/20/2020 Quote Expiration 05/20/2020 Payment Terms 50% DOWN PAYMENT NET 15 Page 7 of 14 40 16.00 Herman Miller E1415.1630M--WL-TR +Tile,Window Mid/Bot 16H 30W WL:+sandstone TR:+clear Tag: GM16 $54.23 $867.68 41 10.00 Herman Miller E1415.1630T--WL-TR +Tile,Window Top 16H 30W WL:+sandstone TR:+clear Tag: GT16 $55.39 $553.90 42 2.00 Herman Miller E1420.1624F--8R-17 +Tile,Face Fabric 16H 24W 8R:+twist-Pr Cat 2 17:+twist birch Tag: FF16 $35.09 $70.18 43 2.00 Herman Miller E1420.0830F--8R-17 +Tile,Face Fabric 08H 30W 8R:+twist-Pr Cat 2 17:+twist birch Tag: FF08 $25.81 $51.62 44 2.00 Herman Miller E1420.0824F--8R-17 +Tile,Face Fabric 08H 24W 8R:+twist-Pr Cat 2 17:+twist birch Tag: FF08 $24.65 $49.30 45 3.00 Herman Miller E1220.86SSE--WL-WL-WL +Conn,2-Way 90 Vinyl,Sq,Pwr 86H WL:+sandstone WL:+sandstone WL:+sandstone $136.30 $408.90 46 1.00 Herman Miller $167.62 $167.62 Proposal Corporate 9800 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763-417-3300 www.intereum.com Quote/Order 59066 Project # Date 04/20/2020 Quote Expiration 05/20/2020 Payment Terms 50% DOWN PAYMENT NET 15 Page 8 of 14 E1230.86SE--WL-WL-WL +Conn,3-Way 90 Vinyl,Pwr 86H WL:+sandstone WL:+sandstone WL:+sandstone 47 1.00 Herman Miller DU6ECS.244260LE--NNP-SUD-LBQ-LBQ-MS-PSC- NNN-57 @Renew 90 Deg Ext Cnr Tbl, C-Foot,Sq-Edge,Lam Top/ Thermo Edge,Elec Std Range, 24D 42W L 60W R NNP:@no power access SUD:@simple up down LBQ:@white twill LBQ:@white twill MS:@metallic silver leg with metallic silver foot PSC:@simple cable NNN:@no cutout 57:@glides Tag: 24/42/72 $1,708.08 $1,708.08 48 1.00 Herman Miller DU6ECS.246042LE--NNP-SUD-LBQ-LBQ-MS-PSC- NNN-57 @Renew 90 Deg Ext Cnr Tbl, C-Foot,Sq-Edge,Lam Top/ Thermo Edge,Elec Std Range, 24D 60W L 42W R NNP:@no power access SUD:@simple up down LBQ:@white twill LBQ:@white twill MS:@metallic silver leg with metallic silver foot PSC:@simple cable NNN:@no cutout 57:@glides Tag: 24/42/72 $1,708.08 $1,708.08 49 1.00 Herman Miller 1B2JK7---233 +Lock Plug and Key,Chrome UM Series 233:+key number 233 $0.00 $0.00 50 1.00 Herman Miller $0.00 $0.00 Proposal Corporate 9800 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763-417-3300 www.intereum.com Quote/Order 59066 Project # Date 04/20/2020 Quote Expiration 05/20/2020 Payment Terms 50% DOWN PAYMENT NET 15 Page 9 of 14 1B2JK7---227 +Lock Plug and Key,Chrome UM Series 227:+key number 227 51 2.00 Herman Miller 1B2JK7---228 +Lock Plug and Key,Chrome UM Series 228:+key number 228 $0.00 $0.00 52 1.00 Herman Miller LTPL-08420--LBQ @Tu File Top, Lam Top/TP Edge 84W 20D LBQ:+white twill $200.00 $200.00 53 2.00 Herman Miller LK400D.4238--SS-WL-KA-MS +Storage Case,Bar Pull,Ptd Mtl Frnt 42W 38H SS:+smooth paint on smooth steel WL:+sandstone KA:+keyed alike MS:+metallic silver $526.08 $1,052.16 54 2.00 Herman Miller LW100.20BBF--SB-SS-WL-KA-1F-3M +Ped W-Pull,Freestd 20D B/B/F SB:+full-extension ball-bearing SS:+smooth paint on smooth steel WL:+sandstone KA:+keyed alike 1F:+standard height 3M:+drawer divider in one box drawer, pencil tray in one box drawer, 2 file converters in file drawer $208.32 $416.64 55 2.00 Herman Miller U1B3B6P---WL Canvas Wall Based,Transition Surface Ptd Top Cap 36" WL:sandstone Tag: SHOP $8.68 $17.36 56 1.00 Herman Miller U1B3B6W---WL @Vivo Square Edge Transaction Surface Hardware Pack $115.63 $115.63 Proposal Corporate 9800 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763-417-3300 www.intereum.com Quote/Order 59066 Project # Date 04/20/2020 Quote Expiration 05/20/2020 Payment Terms 50% DOWN PAYMENT NET 15 Page 10 of 14 WL:@sandstone Tag: SHOP 57 1.00 Intereum Shop Modifications TRANSTOP HDWARE--WL Labor to attach square edge rectangular Transaction Surface directly to topcap & NOTCH for frames WL:SANDSTONE- NOT RAISED (U1B3B6W hardware pack) & U1B3B6T-WL (top cap) will ship to shop) $230.77 $230.77 58 1.00 Intereum Shop Product SHOP5189 36"W x 30.75"H Tambour Door for Ethospace Frame $1,728.57 $1,728.57 59 1.00 Intereum Shop Product SHOP5189 36"W x 38.75"H Tambour Door for Ethospace Frame $1,728.57 $1,728.57 60 1.00 Intereum Shop Product SHOP5189-- 36"W x 33" Custom ADA Oversail Surface :notch for BARE frame $492.86 $492.86 61 1.00 Intereum Shop Product SHOP-End Panel---WL 24Dx34.25H laminate end panel :include L-bracket WL:Sandstone Laminate $492.86 $492.86 Sub Total:$27,877.55 CHANHASSEN-MINNESOTA-55317-CARVER CO-0.07375% SALES TAX:$2,048.62 GRAND TOTAL:$29,926.17 ** This proposal reflects current list price per vendor/manufacturer as stated in current published price schedules as of the completion of this bid/proposal document. ** Proposal Corporate 9800 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763-417-3300 www.intereum.com Quote/Order 59066 Project # Date 04/20/2020 Quote Expiration 05/20/2020 Payment Terms 50% DOWN PAYMENT NET 15 Page 11 of 14 Financing Options For Your Consideration We are pleased to offer the following finance proposal to help facilitate the acquisition of your new furniture solution. Our goal is to offer the best possible payment structure to meet your current and ongoing financing needs. We can provide a wide range of financing options and customized terms. Below, you will find the monthly payment amount for this proposal, for the typical 60 month term. This proposed financing is subject to credit approval by LEAF Commercial Capital, Inc. or its affiliates and the execution of mutually acceptable lease documentation. Does not include applicable sales tax. If you are interested in learning more about this option, please contact your Intereum representative. Total Monthly Payment Amount: $ 515.46 Proposal Corporate 9800 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763-417-3300 www.intereum.com Quote/Order 59066 Project # Date 04/20/2020 Quote Expiration 05/20/2020 Payment Terms 50% DOWN PAYMENT NET 15 Page 12 of 14 GENERAL TERMS & CONDITIONS OF SALE 1. Purchase Orders If purchase orders are required, Buyer must provide copy of purchase order at the time of the order. 2. Down Payment A down payment of 50% of the order total is required at the time of order entry. Down payments must be received by Intereum before an order will be placed. Any down payments required by the manufacturer shall also be required of the Buyer. 3. Invoicing After down payment, the remaining 50% will be invoiced when project installation is substantially complete. For installation phases over one week, progressive billings may be required for services. 4. Taxes All sales, use, excise, and other applicable taxes will be invoiced to the Buyer. If purchaser claims an exemption from such taxes, it shall be the Buyer’s responsibility to furnish an appropriate exemption certificate. 5. Payment Due net 15 days of dated invoice. Buyer may hold 10% retainage for uncompleted installation or an amount equal to the selling price of any damaged, backordered, or missing merchandise. Title to the merchandise passes to the Buyer when the full purchase price and all other charges under this agreement are paid in full. In the event of any default in payment, Seller has the right of repossession of merchandise 90 days from the date of the invoice(s). Buyer is responsible for insurance coverage for loss of product due to damage or theft of product when product is received at the job site. 6. Credit Cards Intereum accepts Visa, MasterCard, and American Express credit cards as a payment option up to $5,000. 7. Changes, Cancellations, and Returns Orders may not be changed or canceled, in whole or in part. 8. Shipments, Deliveries, Freight, and Claims All shipments are made to INTEREUM, INC. or shipped direct from the manufacturer to the end user. INTEREUM, INC. shall not be held responsible for damages due to an act of nature. Partial shipments may be necessary and are at the discretion of the manufacturer. Freight charges incurred by Seller will be invoiced to Buyer. Claims for transportation damage will be Buyer’s responsibility if Buyer receives merchandise directly. 9. Field Measurements Field measuring must take place prior to shop drawing submission and final plan signoff. Client plan review and signoff is required prior to placement of any modular wall, modular millwork, or custom furniture application. All field verifications will be noted on drawing for client signoff. 10. Warehouse Receiving and Storage If product is shipped to Seller’s warehouse, Seller will receive, inspect, and store for 30 days. After 30 days, storage charges will be assessed for all product held in Seller’s warehouse. Proposal Corporate 9800 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763-417-3300 www.intereum.com Quote/Order 59066 Project # Date 04/20/2020 Quote Expiration 05/20/2020 Payment Terms 50% DOWN PAYMENT NET 15 Page 13 of 14 11. Postponement Storage and Labor Costs In the event Buyer requests postponement of agreed upon delivery of goods to site, INTEREUM, INC. may receive and store, at additional cost to the Buyer, or, in the instance of a direct shipment, transfer the goods to storage for the purchaser's account and at purchaser's risk and expense. Such transfer to storage shall be deemed delivery to purchaser for all purposes, including invoicing and payment for product only. Buyer’s insurance company will be responsible for any loss of product due to theft or damage incurred while product is stored at a Buyer’s on-site or off-site facility. 12. Maintenance and Repair All furniture is guaranteed according to manufacturer’s published warranty. Non-warranted repairs and maintenance are at INTEREUM, INC. current hourly rate plus applicable trip charges. DELIVERY AND INSTALLATION TERMS & CONDITIONS OF SALE 13. Delivery & Installation The Buyer agrees that the space will be complete and ready for furniture installation and INTEREUM, INC. will have free and clear access to the space. The Buyer also acknowledges that they will have official occupancy of the space the furniture is being delivered to. Seller will inform Buyer of an estimated date of delivery (“Estimated Delivery Date”) when Seller receives an estimated shipping date from its supplier or manufacturer. The estimated delivery date is not a guaranteed delivery date. Buyer recognizes and acknowledges that the Estimated Delivery Date is merely an estimate and is subject to change by Seller without notice. 14. Electrical Hookup Hardwiring to base building electrical and the connection of the panel to panel festoon and placement of receptacles is not included and must be supplied by licensed electrician in accordance with state and local regulations. If the Buyer requires the Seller to supply a licensed electrician to make the festoon connections and place the receptacles, all cost will be billed over and above the original installation quote. 15. Installer’s Responsibility The installers are responsible for clearing all furniture packing materials from the site, cleaning the furniture they installed, and noting any warranty work or parts needed during final walk through inspection with the Buyer. 16. Job Site Conditions The job site must be ready to accept furniture with construction complete (ceiling grid and tile in, wall covering/paint done, carpet and baseboard finished, electrical/data work done, etc.) and the space free of trades (punch list trades only), as well as clean and free of debris. Adequate facilities for off-loading, staging, moving, and handling of merchandise shall be provided. 17. Job Site Services Electric current, heat/ventilation, hoisting and/ or elevator service will be furnished without charge to Seller. 18. Labor Seller’s ability to erect or assemble furniture knocked down or to permanently attach, affix, or bolt in place movable furniture is dependent in jurisdictional agreements. If trade regulations enforced at the time of installation require the use of tradesmen at the site other than the Seller’s own installation personnel or subcontractor, resulting additional costs will be paid by Buyer. Proposal Corporate 9800 8th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 763-417-3300 www.intereum.com Quote/Order 59066 Project # Date 04/20/2020 Quote Expiration 05/20/2020 Payment Terms 50% DOWN PAYMENT NET 15 Page 14 of 14 19. Loss or Damage After arrival at the site, any loss or damage by weather, other trades such as painting or plastering, fire or other elements, shall be the responsibility of the Buyer, and the Buyer agrees to hold the Seller harmless from loss for such reasons. 20. Normal Business Hours Delivery and installation work will be performed by the Seller’s staff during normal business hours--7:00am-3:30pm--Monday through Friday unless other specific agreements are made in writing and included with proposal. Installation done after normal business hours, on weekends, or on holidays will be subject to an additional overtime charge and subject to the Seller’s acceptance, unless such agreement was specifically agreed to in the final proposal. Work order changes must be done in writing and signed off by both parties prior to performances. 21. Special Packaging If special packaging or handling is required that is not contained in the specifications, it will be subject to extra charge to the Buyer. 22. Staging & Storage Space Provided the merchandise does not arrive at the site earlier than the date requested, safe and adequate storage space will be provided by the Buyer. If the space provided is inconveniently located or on another floor, the extra cost of such moving will be reimbursed by the Buyer. In acknowledgment of Agreement the Buyer, ____________________________________________________________________ and INTEREUM, INC. have had the Agreement signed by the duly authorized officers. Buyer INTEREUM, INC. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (Print) Name and Title (Print) Name and Title ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature Date Signature Date Signature is acceptance of Intereum’s terms and conditions and proposed amount of $29,926.17 Signed _________________________________________Company _______________________________________ Printed Name ____________________________________Title ____________________________________________ Date ___________________________________________ -{ Source City of Chanhassen, MN Capital Improvement Program 2020 thru 2024 PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE Project# Priority 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Capital Ripiacerrent Equipment f*O I Fire Depl.: SCBA Equipment PPE: TumouuHelmeb Computer/Network Equipment Purchases/Upgrades Telecommunicalion Purchases/U pgtades Light Duty Trucks: Communi$ Dev. Dump/Plow Truck Replacements/Additions Light Duty Tru*s: Sfeets Software Purdrases Computerized Records Retenlion System Fire Vehides Aerial Phobgraphy for City GIS Dahseb Adminbtntion Vehble Replaement Engineering Vehicle Replacement Stonage Area Networt (SAN) CSOTTd< Ofrice Fumiture Snowblower SnowBlasl Sicard Sweeper- Parls Light Duty Trucks - Pa*s Mower Replacement - Park Skid loader- Street Department Trac,tor Replacement - Part Brush Chipper Annual Skd Loder Trade ln Copier Replacements Fleet Vehides Miscellaneous Fire EquipmenUHose Replacemenl Recreation Center Revitalization Prciecl Security / Access Contrcl Systems Zero Tum Mower Replacement - Parls Hot Box with Asphalt Premix Heater Crack Sealer Annual Zero Tum Morver Replacement' Park Vibratory Compaclor Craig loader plffi & wing M-B Broom Compressor Steet Sweeper Trailer Replacement Weed Sprayer Vohicte Replacement - Planning Finance/UBlPermiting/Planning Soltware Upgrade City HallRenndel Fire Deparlment Building lmprovemenh EQ4O4 EQ41A EQ-o13 EQ414 EQ415 EQ-o16 EQ-029 EQ418 EQ-049 EQo54 EQ-055 EQ-063 EQ-065 EQ-081 EQ.083 EQ484 E0-098 EQ-099 EQ-100 EQ-104 EQ-105 EQ.706 EQ-115 EQ-124 EQ-127 EQ-l32 EQ-137 EQ-140 EQ-152 EQ-l54 EQ158 E0.759 EQ-164 E0-765 EQ-166 EQ-l67 EG'69 EQ-170 EQ-l71 EG172 EQ-l73 EQ-174 MB-010 M8-A26 30,000 E2,740 6,600 31,000 221,000 50,000 91,000 22,000 30,000 2,1 00 30,400 92,300 2,300 64,000 228,000 36,000 93,200 6,1 00 65,000 17,1 00 29,500 350,000 31,300 79,300 2,300 93,200 5,000 27,000 33,400 s,000 19,000 9,000 15,000 14,300 17,000 1,000 310,000 31,300 76,300 s0,000 93,800 7,000 144,000 2,900 5,000 47,000 18,600 't9,000 9,000 20,000 25,000 1,000 32,250 71,300 330,000 49,000 94,200 17,900 45,600 5,000 1 54,500 41,700 1 90,300 83,000 240,400 104,800 19,000 9,s00 20,000 2s,000 1,000 59,000 46,300 16,400 29,900 33,350 9,900 33,000 350,400 155,250 401,900 61,200 95,000 1,256,000 135,A00 465,400 40,100 239,000 40,000 56,500 45,040 55,000 33,400 25,000 154,500 41,t00 362,300 202,N0 244,400 228,200 86,000 95,000 46,000 35,000 85,000 50,000 41,300 15,000 44,300 47,000 5,0@ 59,000 46,3@ 16,4@ 29,900 ila,000 76,750 9,9N 33,000 369,100 1il,000 218,900 nla nla nla nla nla nla nta nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla nla n!a n/a nla |.la nla nla Na n/a nla nla rVa n/a n/a n/a nla nla nla nla n/a nla Na n/a n/a r,la nla nla nla nla 235,000 242,000 55,000 5,000 5,000 43,000 101,000 19,000 15,000 44,300 15,000 99,500 150,000 93,900 123,400 86,000 19,000 18,500 35,000 '15,000 154,900 125,000 36,000 46,000 1,000 1,000 36,000 114,7@ 7,400 Source Project #Priority 2O2O 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Senior Center/Maple Room Kilcten Update City Hall Roof Replacement Recreation Center Wall Replacement Recreation Center Lobby Fumiture Lake Ann Lake Side Pavilion Roof Replacement City Center Park Paver Replacement MB-li1 MB-033 MB-034 M8-035 PK&T-1i2 PK&T.142 nla nla nla nla nla nla 65,500 12,000 1,875 2,850 9,800 500 9,175 i0,200 3A0,000 65,500 12,000 30,000 165,000 300,000 1,325975 1,451,050 1,4n3oo 1,18,800 \n1,q5 7,1fi,6fi) 1,325,975 1,454,050 1,Ot,3@ 1,129,800 7,n1,47' l,l5&6N 30,000 165,000 Capital Reptecement Equipment Fund Total CRAND TOTAL 1 209780v1 FORM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND CONTRACTOR FOR NON-BID CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made this _____ day of _____________, 2020, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Owner”) and GARDNER BUILDERS MINNEAPOLIS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Contractor”). Owner and Contractor, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the “Contract Documents”, all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Agreement; B. Intereum Design Plans dated __________, 2020; C. Contractor Quote dated ___________, 2020. In the event of a conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “C” having the last priority. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR. The contractor shall provide the goods, services, and perform the work in accordance with the Contract Documents (“Work”). 3. CONTRACT PRICE. Owner shall pay Contractor for completion of the Work in the amount of $30,581.00 upon completion of the Work and in accordance with Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Additional work performed without the City’s written approval will not entitle Contractor to an increase in the Contract Price or an extension of the Contract Time. 4. PAYMENT PROCEDURES. A. Contractor shall submit a final Application for Payment upon completion of the Work. B. Payments to Subcontractor. (1) Prompt Payment to Subcontractors. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 471.25, Subd. 4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor must pay interest of 1 ½ percent per month or any part of a month to the Subcontractor on any undisputed amount not 2 209780v1 paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. (2) Form IC-134 (attached) required from general contractor. Minn. Stat. § 290.92 requires that the City of Chanhassen obtain a Withholding Affidavit for Contractors, Form IC-134, before making final payments to Contractors. This form needs to be submitted by the Contractor to the Minnesota Department of Revenue for approval. The form is used to receive certification from the state that the vendor has complied with the requirement to withhold and remit state withholding taxes for employee salaries paid. D. Final Payment. Upon final completion of the Work and verification of compliance with the requirements of Paragraph 4, Owner shall pay the Contract Price. 5. COMPLETION DATE. The Work must be completed by July 1, 2020. 6. CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS. A. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents and other related data identified in the Contract Documents. B. Contractor has visited the Site and become familiar with and is satisfied as to the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. C. Contractor is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. D. Contractor has carefully studied all: (1) reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or contiguous to the Site and all drawings of physical conditions in or relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at or contiguous to the Site (except Underground Facilities) which have been identified in the General Conditions and (2) reports and drawings of a Hazardous Environmental Condition, if any, at the site. E. Contractor has obtained and carefully studied (or assumes responsibility for doing so) all additional or supplementary examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data concerning conditions (surface, subsurface, and Underground Facilities) at or contiguous to the Site which 3 209780v1 may affect cost, progress, or performance of the Work or which relate to any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor, including any specific means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction expressly required by the Contract Documents, and safety precautions and programs incident thereto. F. Contractor does not consider that any further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract Documents. G. Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by Owner and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. H. Contractor has correlated the information known to Contractor, information and observations obtained from visits to the Site, reports and drawings identified in the Contract Documents, and all additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, and data with the Contract Documents. I. Contractor has given the City written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by Engineer is acceptable to Contractor. J. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. K. Subcontracts: (1) Unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall, upon receipt of the executed Contract Documents, submit in writing to the Owner the names of the Subcontractors proposed for the work. Subcontractors may not be changed except at the request or with the consent of the Owner. (2) The Contractor is responsible to the Owner for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's subcontractors, and of their direct and indirect employees, to the same extent as the Contractor is responsible for the acts and omissions of the Contractor's employees. 4 209780v1 (3) The Contract Documents shall not be construed as creating any contractual relation between the Owner, the Engineer, and any Subcontractor. (4) The Contractor shall bind every Subcontractor by the terms of the Contract Documents. 7. WORKER’S COMPENSATION. The Contractor shall obtain and maintain for the duration of this Contract, statutory Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance as required under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 8. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY. Contractor shall obtain the following minimum insurance coverage and maintain it at all times throughout the life of the Contract, with the City included as an additional name insured on a primary and non- contributory basis. The Contractor shall furnish the City a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City evidencing the required coverage: Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Contractual Liability (identifying the contract): Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 aggregate Personal Injury, with Employment Exclusion deleted: $2,000,000 aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability (owned, non-owned, hired): Bodily Injury: $2,000,000 each occurrence $2,000,000 each accident Property Damage: $2,000,000 each occurrence 9. WARRANTY. The Contractor guarantees that all new equipment warranties as specified within the quote shall be in full force and transferred to the City upon payment by the City. The Contractor shall be held responsible for any and all defects in workmanship, materials, and equipment which may develop in any part of the contracted service, and upon proper notification by the City shall immediately replace, without cost to the City, any such faulty part or parts and damage done by reason of the same in accordance with the bid specifications. 5 209780v1 10. INDEMNITY. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any claim made by third parties as a result of the services performed by it. In addition, the Contractor shall reimburse the City for any cost of reasonable attorney’s fees it may incur as a result of any such claims. 11. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Terms used in this Agreement have the meanings stated in the General Conditions. B. Owner and Contractor each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to the other party hereto, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. C. Any provision or part of the Contract Documents held to be void or unenforceable under any Law or Regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon Owner and Contractor, who agree that the Contract Documents shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provisions. D. Data Practices/Records. (1) All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Contract is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. (2) All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices to the Contractor and its subcontractors, if any, relative to this Contract are subject to examination by the City. E. Software License. If the equipment provided by the Contractor pursuant to this Contract contains software, including that which the manufacturer may have embedded into the hardware as an integral part of the equipment, the Contractor shall pay all software licensing fees. The Contractor shall also pay for all software updating fees for a period of one year following cutover. The Contractor shall have no obligation to pay for such fees thereafter. Nothing in the software license or licensing agreement shall obligate the City to pay any additional fees as a condition for continuing to use the software. 6 209780v1 F. Patented devices, materials and processes. If the Contract requires, or the Contractor desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Contractor shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the Owner. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the Owner from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the Project agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the Owner for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement G. Assignment. Neither party may assign, sublet, or transfer any interest or obligation in this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party, and then only upon such terms and conditions as both parties may agree to and set forth in writing. H. Waiver. In the particular event that either party shall at any time or times waive any breach of this Contract by the other, such waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any other or any succeeding breach of this Contract by either party, whether of the same or any other covenant, condition or obligation. I. Governing Law/Venue. The laws of the State of Minnesota govern the interpretation of this Contract. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Carver County. J. Severability. If any provision, term or condition of this Contract is found to be or become unenforceable or invalid, it shall not affect the remaining provisions, terms and conditions of this Contract, unless such invalid or unenforceable provision, term or condition renders this Contract impossible to perform. Such remaining terms and conditions of the Contract shall continue in full force and effect and shall continue to operate as the parties’ entire contract. K. Entire Agreement. This Contract represents the entire agreement of the parties and is a final, complete and all inclusive statement of the terms thereof, and supersedes and terminates any prior agreement(s), understandings or written or verbal representations made between the parties with respect thereto. L. Permits and Licenses. The Contractor shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees therefore, and give all notices necessary and incidental to the construction and completion of the Project. 7 209780v1 M. If the work is delayed or the sequencing of work is altered because of the action or inaction of the Owner, the Contractor shall be allowed a time extension to complete the work but shall not be entitled to any other compensation. CITY OF CHANHASSEN GARDNER BUILDERS MINNEAPOLIS, LLC. BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor BY: BARRY STOFFEL BY: Its __PRINCIPAL______ Todd Gerhardt, City Manager CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 27, 2020 Subject Award Low Quote, Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach Playground Border Concrete Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.5. Prepared By Adam Beers, Park Superintendent File No: PROPOSED MOTION The City Council approves the low quote to Theis Construction in the amount of $40,000 for concrete work associated with the Park Equipment Replacement Schedule projects at Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND This year's park and trail capital improvement budget contains $255,000 for the park equipment replacement schedule projects. This budget will include the purchase of playground equipment, concrete playground border, engineered wood fiber, as well as a variety of other work to be completed within the park system. The replacement of the aging equipment and new playground border will revitalize the city's park and recreation infrastructure to help ensure that our park system remains a strong element in our mission to provide for today while planning for the future. 2020 CIP Park Equipment Replacement Schedule Overall Budget Power Hill Park playground equipment (city council approved 4/13/2020)$50,000 Lake Ann Park playground equipment (city council approved 4/13/2020)$60,000 Power Hill/ Lake Ann Park concrete playground border $40,000 Engineered wood fiber playground surfacing $20,000 Curry Farms Park basketball court & trail improvements $40,000 Powers Blvd pipe rail fence replacement Rice Marsh Lake Park backstops & benches Meadow Green Park backstops & benches $30,000 Contingency $15,000 Total $255,000 RECOMMENDATION The City Council approves the low quote to Theis Construction in the amount of $40,000 for concrete work associated with the new playground installations at Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach. Funds for the project are included in the 2020 Capital Improvement Program. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectAward Low Quote, Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach Playground Border ConcreteSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.5.Prepared By Adam Beers, Park Superintendent File No: PROPOSED MOTIONThe City Council approves the low quote to Theis Construction in the amount of $40,000 for concrete workassociated with the Park Equipment Replacement Schedule projects at Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThis year's park and trail capital improvement budget contains $255,000 for the park equipment replacement scheduleprojects. This budget will include the purchase of playground equipment, concrete playground border, engineeredwood fiber, as well as a variety of other work to be completed within the park system. The replacement of the agingequipment and new playground border will revitalize the city's park and recreation infrastructure to help ensure thatour park system remains a strong element in our mission to provide for today while planning for the future.2020 CIP Park Equipment Replacement Schedule Overall BudgetPower Hill Park playground equipment (city council approved 4/13/2020)$50,000Lake Ann Park playground equipment (city council approved 4/13/2020)$60,000Power Hill/ Lake Ann Park concrete playground border $40,000 Engineered wood fiber playground surfacing $20,000Curry Farms Park basketball court & trail improvements $40,000Powers Blvd pipe rail fence replacementRice Marsh Lake Park backstops & benchesMeadow Green Park backstops & benches $30,000 Contingency $15,000Total $255,000RECOMMENDATIONThe City Council approves the low quote to Theis Construction in the amount of $40,000 for concrete work associated with the new playground installations at Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach. Funds for the project are included in the 2020 Capital Improvement Program. ATTACHMENTS: Theis Construction & Curbmaster Concrete Quotes CIP Sheet PK&T 141 Power Hill Design Proposal Lake Ann Beach Design Proposal Construction Schedule Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Todd Hoffman 2020 2024 thru Department Park & Trail Improvements Description Replace existing park equipment that has reached its useful life expectancy. 2020 - Curry Farms Park (basketball court & trail), Lake Ann Beach (playground), Powers Blvd (pipe rail fence), Power Hill Park (playground), Rice Marsh Lake Park (backstop and ballfield benches) and Meadow Green Park (backstop and ballfield Benches) 2021 - Carver Beach Park (playground), Lake Susan Park (basketball court), Pheasant Hills Park (playground), Roundhouse Park (structure) and Stone Creek Park (playground) 2022 - Bandimere Park (playground) and North Lotus Park (hockey rink) 2023 - Carver Beach Playground (playground), Sugarbush Park (playground) and South Lotus Lake Park (playground) 2024 - Lake Ann Park (playground), Meadow Green Park (playground) and Lake Ann Park (batting cages) Project #PK&T-141 Priority n/a Justification Existing playground equipment has reached its useful life expectancy of 25 years. Budget Impact/Other Useful LifeProject Name Park Equipment Replacement Category Park Type Equipment Account #2 Account #1 401-0000-4xxx Total Project Cost:$1,505,000 Account #4 Account #3 Total2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Expenditures 1,260,000255,000 245,000 250,000 255,000 255,000Equipment 255,000 245,000 250,000 255,000 255,000 1,260,000Total Prior 245,000 Total Total2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Funding Sources 1,260,000255,000 245,000 250,000 255,000 255,000Park Replacement Fund 255,000 245,000 250,000 255,000 255,000 1,260,000Total Prior 245,000 Total 2/23/2020 Page 1 of 3 PlayPower LT Farmington, Inc. 878 E. US Hwy 60 Monett, MO 65708 1-800-325-8828 QUOTE: RO324190001 Project: R0324_43477755455_02 CITY OF CHANHASSEN POWER HILL PARK Bill To: Project Name & Location: Prepared by: Adam Beers Bill Johhnson City of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-227-1304 (phone) abeers@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Ship To Address: End User: City of Chanhassen Public Works 7901 Park Place Chanhassen, MN 55317 Quote Number: RO324190001 Quote Date: 2/23/2020 Valid For: 60 Days From Quote Date PLAYGROUND BY LITTLE TIKES COMMERCIAL PER DRAWING – INCLUDES: --Age 2–5 Play Builder and 5-12 Kid Builder Play Structure --Gator Walk and Solo / Sit Down Spinner for Ages 2-5 --MaxPlay Swing Set w/ 2 Belt, 1 Tot and 1 ADA Accessible Seat --Raft Multi User Swing --Stand n Spin Spinner for Ages 5-12 --Wobble Sphere Spinner for Ages 5-12 --Shipping to Chanhassen --Supervision of Installation with City Crew & Volunteers $60,000.00 Shipping Included Tax Not Included Total $60,000.00 Note: Above prices are for equipment and supervision only. All site work, concrete, curbing, sidewalks, engineered wood fiber, resilient surfacing, etc….. is by owner. 2/23/2020 Page 2 of 3 Make Purchase Orders Out To: Make Checks Payable To: PlayPower LT Farmington, Inc. PlayPower LT Farmington, Inc. Remit Purchase Orders To: Remit Checks To: PlayPower LT Farmington, Inc. Attention: Sales Administration 878 E US Hwy 60 Monett, Missouri, USA 65708 1-800-325-8828 PlayPower LT Farmington PO Box 734155 Dallas, TX 75373-4155 NOTE: * Applicable sales taxes will be confirmed once order and any tax certificates are received † Denotes drop ship item. Unloading, storage, installation, surfacing and site work are not included unless specifically noted on quotation. Not responsible for filter cloth, irrigation rerouting, grass damage, or checking for underground utilities. If installation is quoted, it is assumed that the site has been prepared and that any grade slope in any direction does not exceed 2%. In the event that unexpected soil conditions, such as subsurface rock, are encountered during installation, additional costs to the customer will be applicable. The acceptance signature below serves as authorization to order the items quoted and indicates acceptance of the prices listed. All terms are subject to credit approval. COMMENTS: This playground contains 14.72% recycled content This playground qualifies for 1 LEED point(s) This Quote shall not become a binding contract until signed and delivered by both Customer and PlayPower LT Farmington Inc (“PPLT”). Sales Representative is not authorized to sign this Quote on behalf of PPLT or Customer, and signed Quotes cannot be accepted from Sales Representative. To submit this offer, please sign below and forward a complete signed copy of this Quote directly to “PPLT Sales Administration” via fax (417)354-2273 or email outdoordes@LTCPS.com. Upon acceptance, PPLT will return a fully-signed copy of the Quote to Customer (with copy to Sales Representative) via fax or e mail. THIS QUOTE IS LIMITED TO AND GOVERNED BY THE TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN. PPLT objects to any other terms proposed by Customer, in writing or otherwise, as material alterations, and all such proposed terms shall be void. Customer authorizes PPLT to ship the Equipment and agrees to pay PPLT the total amount specified. Shipping terms are FOB the place of shipment via common carrier designated by PPLT. Payment terms are Net-30 days from invoice date with approved credit and all charges are due and payable in full at PO Box 734155, Dallas, TX 75373-4155, unless notified otherwise by PPLT in writing. Customer agrees to pay all additional service charges for past due invoices. Customer must provide proper tax exemption certificates to PPLT, and shall promptly pay and discharge all otherwise applicable taxes, license fees, levies and other impositions on the Equipment at its own expense. CUSTOMER HEREBY SUBMITS ITS OFFER TO PURCHASE THE EQUIPMENT ACCORDING TO THE TERMS STATED IN THIS QUOTE AND SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL BY PPLT. XX Submitted By Printed Name and Title Date THE FOREGOING QUOTE AND OFFER ARE HEREBY APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC. By: ___________________________ Date:___________________ ________________________ ________________________ ADDITIONAL TERMS & CONDITIONS OF SALE 2/23/2020 Page 3 of 3 1. Use & Maintenance. Customer agrees to regularly inspect and maintain the Equipment, and to provide, inspect and maintain appropriate safety surfacing under and around the Equipment, in accordance with PPLT’s product literature and the most current Consumer Product Safety Commission Handbook for Public Playground Safety. 2. Default, Remedies & Delinquency Charges. Customer’s failure to pay any invoice when due, or its failure to otherwise comply with the terms of this Quote, shall constitute a default under all unsatisfied invoices ("Event of Default"). Upon an Event of Default, PPLT shall have all remedies available to it at law or equity, including, without limitation, all remedies afforded a secured creditor under the Uniform Commercial Code. Customer agrees to assist and cooperate with PPLT to accomplish its filing and enforcement of mechanic’s or other liens with respect to the Equipment or its location or its repossession of the Equipment, and Customer expressly waives all rights to possess the Equipment after an Event of Default. All remedies are cumulative and not alternative, and no exercise by PPLT of a remedy will prohibit or waive the exercise of any other remedy. Customer shall pay all reasonable attorneys’ fees plus any costs of collection incurred by PPLT in enforcing its rights hereunder. Subject to any limitations under law, Customer shall pay to PPLT as liquidated damages, and not as a penalty, an amount equal to 1.5% per month of any payment that is delinquent in such month and is not received by PPLT within ten (10) days after the date on which due. 3. Limitation of Warranty/ Indemnity. PPLT MAKES NO EQUIPMENT WARRANTIES EXCEPT FOR THOSE STANDARD WARRANTIES ISSUED WITH THE EQUIPMENT, WHICH ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. PPLT SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND ANY LIABILITY FOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES. CUSTOMER AGREES TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND SAVE PPLT HARMLESS FROM ALL CLAIMS OF ANY KIND FOR DAMAGES OF ANY KIND ARISING OUT OF CUSTOMER’S ALTERATION OF THE EQUIPMENT, ITS FAILURE TO MAINTAIN THE EQUIPMENT, ITS FAILURE TO PROPERLY SUPERVISE EQUIPMENT USE, OR ITS FAILURE TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN APPROPRIATE TYPES AND DEPTHS OF SAFETY SURFACING BENEATH AND AROUND THE EQUIPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PPLT’S INSTALLATION AND OWNER’S MANUALS AND THE MOST CURRENT CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION HANDBOOK FOR PUBLIC PLAYGROUND SAFETY. 4. Restrictions. Until all amounts due hereunder are paid in full, Customer shall not: (i) permit the Equipment to be levied upon or attached under any legal process; (ii) transfer title to the Equipment or any of Customer's rights therein; or (iii) remove or permit the removal of the Equipment to any location not specified in this Quote. 5. Purchase Money Security Interest. Customer hereby grants, pledges and assigns to PPLT, and PPLT hereby reserves a purchase money security interest in, the Equipment in order to secure the payment and performance in full of all of Customer’s obligations hereunder. Customer agrees that PPLT may file one or more financing statements, in order to allow it to perfect, acquire and maintain a superior security interest in the Equipment. 6. Choice of Law and Jurisdiction. All agreements between Customer and PPLT shall be interpreted, and the parties' obligations shall be governed, by the laws of the State of Missouri without reference to its choice of law provisions. Customer hereby consents to the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the city and county of St. Louis, Missouri. 7. Title; Risk of Loss; Insurance. PPLT Retains full title to all Equipment until full payment is received by PPLT. Customer assumes all risk of loss or destruction of or damage to the Equipment by reason of theft, fire, water, or any other cause, and the occurrence of any such casualty shall not relieve the Customer from its obligations hereunder and under any invoices. Until all amounts due hereunder are paid in full, Customer shall insure the Equipment against all such losses and casualties. 8. Waiver; Invalidity. PPLT may waive a default hereunder, or under any invoice or other agreement between Customer and PPLT, or cure such a default at Customer's expense, but shall have no obligation to do either. No waiver shall be deemed to have taken place unless it is in writing, signed by PPLT. Any one waiver shall not constitute a waiver of other defaults or the same kind of default at another time, or a forfeiture of any rights provided to PPLT hereunder or under any invoice. The invalidity of any portion of this Quote shall not affect the force and effect of the remaining valid portions hereof. 9. Entire Agreement; Amendment; Binding Nature. This fully-executed Quote, as supplemented by Change Orders and invoices containing exact amounts of estimates provided herein, constitutes the complete and exclusive agreement between the parties. A Change Order is a written instrument signed by the Customer and PPLT stating their agreement as to any amendment in the terms of this Quote. Customer acknowledges that Change Orders may result in delays and additional costs. The parties agree that all Change Orders shall include appropriate adjustments in price and time frames relating to any requested amendments. Upon full execution, this Quote shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their successors and assigns. 10. Counterparts; Electronic Transmission. This Quote, any invoice, and any other agreement between the parties, may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. The facsimile or other electronic transmission of any signed original document, and retransmission of any signed facsimile or other electronic transmission, shall be the same as the transmission of an original. At the request of either party, the parties will confirm facsimile or other electronically transmitted signatures by signing an original document. 3DJHRI 3OD\3RZHU/7)DUPLQJWRQ,QF (86+Z\ 0RQHWW02 4827(52 3URMHFW5BB &,7<2)&+$1+$66(1 /$.($11%($&+3$5. %LOO7R3URMHFW1DPH /RFDWLRQ33UHSDUHGE\ $GDP%HHUV%LOO-RKKQVRQ &LW\RI&KDQKDVVHQ 32%R[ &KDQKDVVHQ01 SKRQH DEHHUV#FLFKDQKDVVHQPQXV 6KLS7R$GGUHVV(QG8VHU &LW\RI&KDQKDVVHQ 3XEOLF:RUNV 3DUN3ODFH &KDQKDVVHQ01 4XRWH1XPEHU 52 4XRWH'DWH 9DOLG)RU 'D\V)URP4XRWH'DWH &203/(7(3/$<$5($%</,77/(7,.(6&200(5&,$/3(5'5$:,1*±,1&/8'(6 $JH.LG%XLOGHU3OD\6WUXFWXUH 7ZR7LHU3OD\JURXQG'HVLJQZ$FFHVVIURP´ ´'HFNV 0D[3OD\6ZLQJ6HWZ%HOW7RWDQG$'$$FFHVVLEOH6HDW 6WDQGQ6SLQ6SLQQHU 6KLSSLQJWR&KDQKDVVHQ 6XSHUYLVLRQRI,QVWDOODWLRQZLWK&LW\&UHZ 9ROXQWHHUV 7KDWFK%DPERR5RRIRQ´+LJK'HFN±.LG%XLOGHU 6KLSSLQJ,QFOXGHG 7D[1RW,QFOXGHG 7RWDO 1RWH$ERYHSULFHVDUHIRUHTXLSPHQWDQGVXSHUYLVLRQRQO\$OOVLWHZRUNFRQFUHWHFXUELQJVLGHZDONVHQJLQHHUHGZRRG ILEHUUHVLOLHQWVXUIDFLQJHWF«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³33/7´6DOHV5HSUHVHQWDWLYHLVQRWDXWKRUL]HGWRVLJQWKLV4XRWHRQEHKDOIRI33/7RU&XVWRPHUDQG VLJQHG4XRWHVFDQQRWEHDFFHSWHGIURP6DOHV5HSUHVHQWDWLYH7RVXEPLWWKLVRIIHUSOHDVHVLJQEHORZDQGIRUZDUGD FRPSOHWHVLJQHGFRS\RIWKLV4XRWHGLUHFWO\WR³33/76DOHV$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ´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¶VSURGXFWOLWHUDWXUHDQG WKHPRVWFXUUHQW&RQVXPHU3URGXFW6DIHW\&RPPLVVLRQ+DQGERRNIRU3XEOLF3OD\JURXQG6DIHW\ 'HIDXOW 5HPHGLHV 'HOLQTXHQF\ &KDUJHV &XVWRPHU¶V IDLOXUH WR SD\ DQ\ LQYRLFH ZKHQ GXH RU LWV IDLOXUH WR RWKHUZLVHFRPSO\ZLWKWKHWHUPVRIWKLV4XRWHVKDOOFRQVWLWXWHDGHIDXOWXQGHUDOOXQVDWLVILHGLQYRLFHV(YHQWRI'HIDXOW 8SRQDQ(YHQWRI'HIDXOW33/7VKDOOKDYHDOOUHPHGLHVDYDLODEOHWRLWDWODZRUHTXLW\LQFOXGLQJZLWKRXWOLPLWDWLRQDOO UHPHGLHVDIIRUGHGDVHFXUHGFUHGLWRUXQGHUWKH8QLIRUP&RPPHUFLDO&RGH&XVWRPHUDJUHHVWRDVVLVWDQGFRRSHUDWHZLWK 33/7WRDFFRPSOLVKLWVILOLQJDQGHQIRUFHPHQWRIPHFKDQLF¶VRURWKHUOLHQVZLWKUHVSHFWWRWKH(TXLSPHQWRULWVORFDWLRQRULWV UHSRVVHVVLRQ RI WKH (TXLSPHQW DQG &XVWRPHU H[SUHVVO\ ZDLYHV DOO ULJKWV WR SRVVHVV WKH (TXLSPHQW DIWHU DQ (YHQW RI 'HIDXOW$OOUHPHGLHVDUHFXPXODWLYHDQGQRWDOWHUQDWLYHDQGQRH[HUFLVHE\33/7RIDUHPHG\ZLOOSURKLELWRUZDLYHWKH H[HUFLVHRIDQ\RWKHUUHPHG\&XVWRPHUVKDOOSD\DOOUHDVRQDEOHDWWRUQH\V¶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¶6$/7(5$7,212)7+((48,30(17,76)$,/85(72 0$,17$,1 7+( (48,30(17 ,76 )$,/85( 72 3523(5/< 683(59,6( (48,30(17 86( 25 ,76 )$,/85( 72 3529,'($1'0$,17$,1$335235,$7(7<3(6$1''(37+62)6$)(7<685)$&,1*%(1($7+$1'$5281' 7+( (48,30(17 ,1 $&&25'$1&( :,7+ 33/7¶6 ,167$//$7,21 $1' 2:1(5¶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¶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onstruction Schedule Power Hill Park - Recommendation to City Council to approve purchase – April 13th - Order Playground Equipment: April 14th /receive playground delivery – May 25th - Removal of existing playground equipment: April 14th – April 24th - Site grading and concrete installation: April 27th - May 25th - Playground Install/site restoration: May 26th – June 12th Lake Ann Park Beach - Recommendation to City Council to approve purchases – April 13th - Order playground equipment: April 14th/ receive playground delivery – May 25th - Removal of existing playground equipment: Aug 24th – Sept 7th - Site grading and concrete installation: Sept 8th – Sept 25th - Playground installation/site restoration: Sept 28th – Oct 16th CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 27, 2020 Subject 2020 Watercraft Inspection Agreement Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.6. Prepared By Matt Unmacht, Water Resources Coordinator File No: SWMP 13G PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council authorizes execution of an Aquatic Invasive Species Watercraft Inspection Agreement with Carver County." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The purpose of this agreement is to help prevent the introduction of new Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) into Lake Ann, Lake Susan, and Lotus Lake through AIS education and inspections. The overall cost of the program is $55,403.48 but the cost to the City is nottoexceed $18,500. The agreement has been reviewed by both City and County staff. BACKGROUND The overall program costs $55,403.48, all of which is to be paid by the City to the County. However, the City is sharing the cost of the program with RPBCWD and the Lotus Lake Conservation Alliance. RPBCWD has agreed to pay $32,000 and the LLCA has agreed to pay $10,403.48, $5,000 of which has already been paid. Written agreements for the respective financial contributions with both organizations have been obtained. The City has financially supported this program since 2014. This is a budgeted expense coming from the Surface Water Management Fund 72000004300. Lake Ann and Lake Susan will receive 628 Inspection Hours, and Lotus Lake will receive 2485 Inspection Hours. The increase at Lotus Lake is due to the LLCA financial contribution to the program. Carver County will employ DNR certified staff at each lake to visually inspect watercraft before they enter and when leaving the lakes to control the spread of AIS. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the execution of this agreement with Carver County. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020Subject2020 Watercraft Inspection AgreementSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.6.Prepared By Matt Unmacht, Water ResourcesCoordinator File No: SWMP 13GPROPOSED MOTION“The City Council authorizes execution of an Aquatic Invasive Species Watercraft Inspection Agreement with CarverCounty."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe purpose of this agreement is to help prevent the introduction of new Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) into LakeAnn, Lake Susan, and Lotus Lake through AIS education and inspections. The overall cost of the program is$55,403.48 but the cost to the City is nottoexceed $18,500. The agreement has been reviewed by both City andCounty staff. BACKGROUNDThe overall program costs $55,403.48, all of which is to be paid by the City to the County. However, the City issharing the cost of the program with RPBCWD and the Lotus Lake Conservation Alliance. RPBCWD has agreed topay $32,000 and the LLCA has agreed to pay $10,403.48, $5,000 of which has already been paid. Writtenagreements for the respective financial contributions with both organizations have been obtained. The City hasfinancially supported this program since 2014. This is a budgeted expense coming from the Surface WaterManagement Fund 72000004300. Lake Ann and Lake Susan will receive 628 Inspection Hours, and Lotus Lake will receive 2485 Inspection Hours.The increase at Lotus Lake is due to the LLCA financial contribution to the program. Carver County will employ DNR certified staff at each lake to visually inspect watercraft before they enter and whenleaving the lakes to control the spread of AIS.RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the execution of this agreement with Carver County. ATTACHMENTS: 2020 Watercraft Inspection Agreement 1 City of Chanhassen AIS Watercraft Inspection Agreement AGREEMENT entered into as of _______________, 2020 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), and COUNTY OF CARVER, a body corporate and politic under the laws of Minnesota (“County”). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants and obligations, the City and County agree as follows: I. COUNTY SERVICES The purpose of this Agreement is to assist the City in preventing the introduction of new Aquatic Invasive Species (hereinafter called “AIS”) into Lake Ann, Lake Susan and Lotus Lake through AIS education and inspections. The primary contact for the County is Andrew Dickhart and Matt Unmacht is the primary contact for the City. II. SPECIALIZED PROFESSIONAL AGREEMENT SPECIFICATIONS 1. This Agreement shall commence upon its execution by both parties and continue through November 30, 2020. The total amount of compensation to be paid to the County shall not exceed $55,903.48. 2. Inspections will be conducted at the following public access points: Lake Ann, Lake Susan and Lotus Lake in accordance with the schedule attached as Appendix A. 3. Inspections outside of the foregoing hours shall be conducted by the County only with the mutual consent and agreement of the City and the County. The maximum total number of watercraft inspection hours for these days from May 9, 2020 through November 15, 2020 is three thousand seven hundred forty-one (3,741). 4. The County will provide all necessary supervision to assure that the County’s employees satisfactorily perform their duties under this Agreement. 5. The County will onboard applicants as employee inspectors, be responsible for training, scheduling, and payroll during the term of this agreement. The County will provide inspector service as long it has inspector staffing or to the term of this agreement, whichever comes first. 6. Watercraft inspectors placed by the County shall perform in accordance with the approved position description attached in Appendix B. The City will reimburse the County for inspections at the rate of Sixteen Dollars and 28/100 ($16.28) per hour up to a total not to exceed $55,903.48. 7. The County will provide reports showing actual time spe nt at each location. 2 8. The county will coordinate MN DNR training sessions for the inspectors to be certified as Level I or Level II inspecto rs. 9. The County shall act in all respects as an independent Contractor under this Agreement and will be solely responsible for performance of services required hereunder, as well as the means and manner of performance thereof. Nothing herein authorizes the County to act as an agent or representative of the City for any purpose. 10. Any amendment to this agreement must be in writing and executed by both the County and the City III. INDEMNIFICATION Each party shall be liable for its own acts to t he extent provided by law and hereby agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the other, its officers and employees against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages, expenses, claims or actions, including attorney’s fees which the other, its officers and employees may hereafter sustain, incur or be required to pay, arising out of or by reason of any act or omission of the party, its agents, servants or employees, in the execution or performance or failure to adequately perform its obligations pursua nt to this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that the County’s and City’s liability shall be limited by the provisions of Minn.Stat.Chap.466 and/or other applicable law. To the full extent permitted by law, actions by the parties pursuant to this Agr eement are intended to be and shall be construed as a “cooperative activity” and it is the intent of the parties that they shall be deemed a “single government unit” for the purposes of liability, all as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, Subd. 1a(a); provided further that for purposes of that statute, each party to this Agreement expressly declines responsibility for the acts of omissions of the other party. IV. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES 1. Payments to the County will be paid as services are performed and will be paid within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of the County’s invoice, which shall be su bmitted after completion of program. 2. All other expenses incurred by the County in completing the work required under this Agreement will be t he County’s responsibility. V. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT This Agreement may be terminated at any time and for any reason by the City on seven (7) days’ written notice. In the event of termination by the City, the County is entitled to compensation based on the number of hours worked up to the effective date of termination. VI. NOTICE 1. Any notice, request, demand or other communication required or permitted under the terms of this Agreement shall be deemed to be properly given when deposited in the United 3 States Postal Service, postage prepaid, and addressed to the agent of each party as specified herein. 2. However, when this Agreement requires immediate notice, such notice shall be accomplished by telephone to the designated agent of the parties or by facsimile to the numbers listed herein: (a) Notices to City should be sent to: City of Chanhassen Attn: Matt Unmacht 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone: 952-227-1168 Fax: 952-227-1110 (b) Notices to the County should be sent to: Carver County Attn: Andrew Dickhart 600 E. 4th Street Chaska, Minnesota Telephone: 952-361-1871 Fax: 952-361-1828 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby. CITY OF CHANHASSEN, COUNTY OF CARVER MINNESOTA BY: BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor James Ische, Chair, Board of Commissioners Date: ________________________, 2020 Date:________________________, 2020 4 APPENDIX A. 2020 Program Details Duration of Inspections: Lake Ann and Lake Susan 47 Days (5/25/20 - 9/7/20) Lotus Lake 190 days (5/09/20 - 11/15/20) Coverage Times: Lake Ann & Lake Susan: Fridays & Sundays (7 a.m. to 8 p.m.) Saturdays (6 a.m. to 8 p.m.) and holidays Lotus Lake: May 09 to September 7 (6 am to 8 pm) September 8-30 (6:30 am to 7:30 pm) October 1-15 (7:00 am to 7:00 pm) October 16 – Oct 31 (7:30 am to 6:30 pm) November 1-15 (7:00 am to 4:00 pm) Total Inspection Hours: Lake Ann 628 hours Lake Susan 628 hours Lotus Lake 2485 hours 3741 hours Combined Program Budget Inspections 3741 @ $16.28/hr $60,903.48 Funding: Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District RPBCWD $32,0000 City of Chanhassen $18,500 Lotus Lake Conservation Alliance/LLCA $10,403.48 LLCA Deposit ($5,000) Total owed by City $55,403.48 5 Who County CC Hrs Day:Hours to Cover Per Day 14 Mon 6am - 8pm Per Week 98 Tues 6am - 8pm Total Inspection days 122 Wed 6am - 8pm Total Inspection hours 1708 Thur 6am - 8pm Total Inspection $ at 16.28/hr 27,806.24$ Fri 6am - 8pm Sat 6am - 8pm Sun 6am - 8pm May 09- Sept 07 ↑ Who County CC Hrs Day:Hours to Cover Per Day 13 Mon 6: 30am - 7:30pm Per Week 91 Tues 6: 30am - 7:30pm Total Inspection days 22 Wed 6: 30am - 7:30pm Total Inspection hours 286 Thur 6: 30am - 7:30pm Total Inspection $ at 16.28/hr 4,656.08$ Fri 6: 30am - 7:30pm Sat 6: 30am - 7:30pm Sun 6: 30am - 7:30pm Sept 8 - Sept 30 ↑ Who County CC Hrs Day:Hours to Cover Per Day 12 Mon 7am - 7pm Per Week 84 Tues 7am - 7pm Total Inspection days 15 Wed 7am - 7pm Total Inspection hours 180 Thur 7am - 7pm Total Inspection $ at 16.28/hr 2,930.40$ Fri 7am - 7pm Sat 7am - 7pm Sun 7am - 7pm Oct 1- Oct 15 ↑ Who County CC Hrs Day:Hours to Cover Per Day 11 Mon 7:30am - 6:30pm Per Week 77 Tues 7:30am - 6:30pm Total Inspection days 16 Wed 7:30am - 6:30pm Total Inspection hours 176 Thur 7:30am - 6:30pm Total Inspection $ at 16.28/hr 2,865.28$ Fri 7:30am - 6:30pm Sat 7:30am - 6:30pm Sun 7:30am - 6:30pm Oct 16- Oct 31 ↑ Who County CC Hrs Day:Hours to Cover Per Day 9 Mon 7:00 am - 4pm Per Week 63 Tues 7:00 am - 4pm Total Inspection days 15 Wed 7:00 am - 4pm Total Inspection hours 135 Thur 7:00 am - 4pm Total Inspection $ at 16.28/hr 2,197.80$ Fri 7:00 am - 4pm Sat 7:00 am - 4pm Sun 7:00 am - 4pm Nov 1- Nov 15 Lotus Lake Program Breakdown 6 Who County CC Hrs Day:Hours to Cover Per Day Mon Per Week 40 Tues Total Inspection days 47 Wed Total Inspection hours 628 Thur Total Inspection $ at 16.28/hr 10,223.84$ Fri 7am - 8pm Sat 6am - 8pm Including Mem. Day, July 4, and Labor Day Sun 7am - 8pm May 25- Sept 7 Who County CC Hrs Day:Hours to Cover Per Day Mon Per Week 40 Tues Total Inspection days 47 Wed Total Inspection hours 628 Thur Total Inspection $ at 16.28/hr 10,223.84$ Fri 7am - 8pm Sat 6am - 8pm Including Mem. Day, July 4, and Labor Day Sun 7am - 8pm May 25- Sept 7 Lake Ann Program Breakdown Lake Susan Program Breakdown 7 APPENDIX B. STOC - Seasonal AIS Watercraft Inspector Bargaining Unit: STOc Class Code: STOC- 0606 CARVER COUNTY Established Date: Feb 1, 2012 Revision Date: Jan 28, 2016 SALARY RANGE $12.00 - $17.50 Hourly JOB SUMMARY: The Watercraft Inspector serves to inform and educate the public to the threats of ecologically harmful aquatic invasive species to Minnesota's waters. Inspectors work at public water access sites educating the public by providing information to watercraft users and conducting a brief survey while inspecting watercraft for invasive species. Other duties include assisting the coordinator with access postings, assisting Law Enforcement with access checks, invasive plant removal; conduct other research in partnership with different departments/organizations and other natural resource projects. There are three levels to this position: *Level I Watercraft Inspector: Level I Watercraft Inspectors will be required to attend and pass a MN DNR inspection training course and will be responsible for public education, watercraft inspections for Aquatic Invasive Species, documentation and reporting, on-site surveys and sample collection. Pay Range is $12.00-$14.00 per hour. *Level II Watercraft Inspector: Level II Watercraft Inspectors will be required to attend a MN DNR decontamination training course in addition to a MN DNR inspection training course. A Level II inspector will have the same responsibilities as a Level I, but will also be certified to perform decontamination services using hot, high-pressure water. Pay Range is $14.00-$15.50 per hour. *Lead Watercraft Inspector: Lead Inspectors will be Level II certified and be capable of taking 8 on additional leadership and administrative responsibilities such as employee training and supervision, scheduling, inventory, oversight of day-to-day operations, etc. Pay Range is $16.00- $17.50 per hour. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: • At least 18 years of age. • Available to work weekends, weekdays and holidays on a regular basis throughout employment (Approximately May through September) between 5am – 8 pm. • A Valid Minnesota Class D Driver's License. • Available to work in multiple locations throughout Carver County ESSENTIAL DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES: • Educate the public on invasive species program and issues • Distribute written information to watercraft users • Inspect watercraft for invasive species • Conduct a verba l survey & inspection inventory • Document and record research activities • Provide excellent customer service skills and the ability to work with the public and in an office and field setting. • Work independently with minimal supervision •Communicate effectively. ESSENTIAL SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE: • Excellent verbal communication skills • Sound understanding of customer relations • Ability to coordinate multiple tasks within a professional setting • Ability to work independently with minimal supervision • Willingness to work odd hours and in adverse weather conditions • Sense of humor • Demonstrated interest in environmental work through education, volunteer work, and/or hobbies Requires use/operation of: • Telephone/Cell Phone • Computer SUPERVISORY /MANAGERIAL RESPONSIBILITY: None for Level I and II Some supervisory duties required for Lead Inspectors 9 WORK ENVIRONMENT: Outdoor work setting. Inclement weather conditions. PHYSICAL JOB REQUIREMENTS: Requires frequently lifting and/or carrying objects such as file boxes and portable chairs. This job may require walking or standing to a significant degree on rough terrain or may involve sitting most of the time with pushing and pulling of arm and/or leg controls. May require occasional use of short step ladder for boat inspections. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 27, 2020 Subject Resolutions 2020XX & 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 2002: Award Contract and Approve Assessment Roll Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.1. Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202002 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council adopts a resolution accepting the bids for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 2002 and awarding the contract to Lametti and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $3,691,889.00. The City Council adopts a resolution adopting the assessment roll for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 2002.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY On October 26, 2018, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) for consultant services for the project. On November 8, 2018, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professional services for the Minnewashta Parkway project. On January 14, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with KimleyHorn and Associates and authorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project. On October 14, 2019, the City Council accepted the feasibility study and called a public hearing to be held on October 28, 2019. On October 28, 2019, the City Council held a public hearing and authorized preparation of plans and specifications. On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Victoria. On February 10, 2020, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids. On March 6, 2020, staff opened and read aloud bids for the project. BACKGROUND CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectResolutions 2020XX & 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 2002:Award Contract and Approve Assessment RollSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.1.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202002PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution accepting the bids for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No.2002 and awarding the contract to Lametti and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $3,691,889.00.The City Council adopts a resolution adopting the assessment roll for the Minnewashta Parkway RehabilitationProject No. 2002.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYOn October 26, 2018, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project.On November 8, 2018, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Minnewashta Parkway project.On January 14, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with KimleyHorn and Associates andauthorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project.On October 14, 2019, the City Council accepted the feasibility study and called a public hearing to be held onOctober 28, 2019.On October 28, 2019, the City Council held a public hearing and authorized preparation of plans and specifications.On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Victoria.On February 10, 2020, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorizingadvertisement for bids.On March 6, 2020, staff opened and read aloud bids for the project. BACKGROUND Minnewashta Parkway is a collector street located on the west side of Lake Minnewashta between Highway 5 and Highway 7. The roadway and utilities are in need of rehabilitation. The City's 2019 Capital Improvement Plan planned for the rehabilitation of Minnewashta Parkway in 2020. The original project limits on the north end extended from the south side of the intersection with State Trunk Highway 7 to the City limits on the south end near the intersection of Hawthorne Circle. Hawthorne Circle south to State Trunk Highway 5 was thought at the time to be the jurisdiction of the City of Victoria. The plan was to collaborate with the City of Victoria to rehabilitate this section of roadway to facilitate a continuous improvement project from Highway 7 to Highway 5. During the preliminary project design process, staff researched and identified that the City of Chanhassen owns right ofway within Victoria for Minnewashta Parkway. In 1992, at the request of the Cities of Chanhassen and Victoria, the Municipal Board of the State of Minnesota concluded the rightofway for Minnewashta Parkway between Hawthorne Circle and State Trunk Highway 5 would be ceded from the City of Victoria to the City of Chanhassen. This allowed Minnewashta Parkway to be eligible for StateAid funding and Chanhassen subsequently adding the length of Minnewashta Parkway to their MSA road segments. Due to this finding, the project limits were revised to include the section of Minnewashta Parkway between Hawthorne Circle and 77th Street West. The section of Minnewashta Parkway between 77th Street West and the rightofway for Highway 5 is not in need of rehabilitation. In addition, sanitary sewer and water utilities are not under the majority of this section of roadway. Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the original project limits as shown in Figure 1. The project included a 1.35mile long urbanized street corridor. The existing road section was originally constructed in 1990. The revised project limits will add approximately 850 feet of street and utilities to the rehabilitation project. Figure 1: Project Area Map As Minnewashta Parkway is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route the city will utilize State Aid funding in addition to special assessments to finance the street improvements. The special assessments will be to benefiting properties as defined by the City's Assessment Practice. Utility funds collected by the City will be used for funding the utility improvements. During the preliminary engineering it was determined the rehabilitation of the watermain and the two sanitary forcemains dictated the surfacing rehabilitation technique change from a mill and overlay to a fulldepth reclamation. The most effective trenchless utility rehabilitation method was identified in the feasibility report to be pipe bursting. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectResolutions 2020XX & 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 2002:Award Contract and Approve Assessment RollSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.1.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202002PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution accepting the bids for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No.2002 and awarding the contract to Lametti and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $3,691,889.00.The City Council adopts a resolution adopting the assessment roll for the Minnewashta Parkway RehabilitationProject No. 2002.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYOn October 26, 2018, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project.On November 8, 2018, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Minnewashta Parkway project.On January 14, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with KimleyHorn and Associates andauthorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project.On October 14, 2019, the City Council accepted the feasibility study and called a public hearing to be held onOctober 28, 2019.On October 28, 2019, the City Council held a public hearing and authorized preparation of plans and specifications.On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Victoria.On February 10, 2020, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorizingadvertisement for bids.On March 6, 2020, staff opened and read aloud bids for the project.BACKGROUNDMinnewashta Parkway is a collector street located on the west side of Lake Minnewashta between Highway 5 andHighway 7. The roadway and utilities are in need of rehabilitation. The City's 2019 Capital Improvement Planplanned for the rehabilitation of Minnewashta Parkway in 2020. The original project limits on the north end extendedfrom the south side of the intersection with State Trunk Highway 7 to the City limits on the south end near theintersection of Hawthorne Circle. Hawthorne Circle south to State Trunk Highway 5 was thought at the time to be thejurisdiction of the City of Victoria. The plan was to collaborate with the City of Victoria to rehabilitate this section ofroadway to facilitate a continuous improvement project from Highway 7 to Highway 5.During the preliminary project design process, staff researched and identified that the City of Chanhassen owns rightofway within Victoria for Minnewashta Parkway. In 1992, at the request of the Cities of Chanhassen and Victoria,the Municipal Board of the State of Minnesota concluded the rightofway for Minnewashta Parkway betweenHawthorne Circle and State Trunk Highway 5 would be ceded from the City of Victoria to the City of Chanhassen. This allowed Minnewashta Parkway to be eligible for StateAid funding and Chanhassen subsequently adding thelength of Minnewashta Parkway to their MSA road segments.Due to this finding, the project limits were revised to include the section of Minnewashta Parkway between HawthorneCircle and 77th Street West. The section of Minnewashta Parkway between 77th Street West and the rightofwayfor Highway 5 is not in need of rehabilitation. In addition, sanitary sewer and water utilities are not under the majorityof this section of roadway.Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the original project limits asshown in Figure 1. The project included a 1.35mile long urbanized street corridor. The existing road section wasoriginally constructed in 1990. The revised project limits will add approximately 850 feet of street and utilities to therehabilitation project.Figure 1: Project Area MapAs Minnewashta Parkway is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route the city will utilize State Aid fundingin addition to special assessments to finance the street improvements. The special assessments will be to benefitingproperties as defined by the City's Assessment Practice. Utility funds collected by the City will be used for funding theutility improvements.During the preliminary engineering it was determined the rehabilitation of the watermain and the two sanitary forcemains dictated the surfacing rehabilitation technique change from a mill and overlay to a fulldepth reclamation. The most effective trenchless utility rehabilitation method was identified in the feasibility report to be pipe bursting. This installation technique will require excavations at bend locations, services, hydrants, and boring pits every 300400 feet depending on conditions encountered and the contractor. The overall amount of excavations and associated curb removals affect the feasibility of a mill and overlay project and make a fulldepth reclamation project more effective. The current pavement overall condition index (OCI) is 63 which is within the range where overlays should be considered. The road is heavily patched and would score a lower OCI if the road was not constantly patched. Staff has received many complaints about the surface condition of the roadway. The preliminary geotechnical information indicated the surfacing improvements for the street section could be accomplished via a mill and overlay in areas that did not require significant excavation for utility improvements. The original intent was to replace only the cast iron watermain per City policy and to minimize the amount of excavations. The break history in the utilities identified problems mostly in the ductile iron sections. Hence, it was determined the entire length of the watermain and the two forcemains needed to be replaced to avoid future breaks under the new pavement. The selection of an appropriate trenchless installation method allows the project to use a fulldepth reclamation method in lieu of making it a full reconstruction project. UTILITIES Watermain: The existing main is 12inch cast iron and ductile iron pipe of early 1970's vintage. The city's policy is to replace existing cast iron watermain when a street project occurs due to past history, existing soil conditions, and the attributes associated with the material. The existing watermain has had 10 breaks associated with it since 2001. The break locations are identified in Figure 2 below. The most recent break was repaired in December 2018 and the location is not indicated on the map. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectResolutions 2020XX & 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 2002:Award Contract and Approve Assessment RollSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.1.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202002PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution accepting the bids for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No.2002 and awarding the contract to Lametti and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $3,691,889.00.The City Council adopts a resolution adopting the assessment roll for the Minnewashta Parkway RehabilitationProject No. 2002.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYOn October 26, 2018, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project.On November 8, 2018, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Minnewashta Parkway project.On January 14, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with KimleyHorn and Associates andauthorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project.On October 14, 2019, the City Council accepted the feasibility study and called a public hearing to be held onOctober 28, 2019.On October 28, 2019, the City Council held a public hearing and authorized preparation of plans and specifications.On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Victoria.On February 10, 2020, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorizingadvertisement for bids.On March 6, 2020, staff opened and read aloud bids for the project.BACKGROUNDMinnewashta Parkway is a collector street located on the west side of Lake Minnewashta between Highway 5 andHighway 7. The roadway and utilities are in need of rehabilitation. The City's 2019 Capital Improvement Planplanned for the rehabilitation of Minnewashta Parkway in 2020. The original project limits on the north end extendedfrom the south side of the intersection with State Trunk Highway 7 to the City limits on the south end near theintersection of Hawthorne Circle. Hawthorne Circle south to State Trunk Highway 5 was thought at the time to be thejurisdiction of the City of Victoria. The plan was to collaborate with the City of Victoria to rehabilitate this section ofroadway to facilitate a continuous improvement project from Highway 7 to Highway 5.During the preliminary project design process, staff researched and identified that the City of Chanhassen owns rightofway within Victoria for Minnewashta Parkway. In 1992, at the request of the Cities of Chanhassen and Victoria,the Municipal Board of the State of Minnesota concluded the rightofway for Minnewashta Parkway betweenHawthorne Circle and State Trunk Highway 5 would be ceded from the City of Victoria to the City of Chanhassen. This allowed Minnewashta Parkway to be eligible for StateAid funding and Chanhassen subsequently adding thelength of Minnewashta Parkway to their MSA road segments.Due to this finding, the project limits were revised to include the section of Minnewashta Parkway between HawthorneCircle and 77th Street West. The section of Minnewashta Parkway between 77th Street West and the rightofwayfor Highway 5 is not in need of rehabilitation. In addition, sanitary sewer and water utilities are not under the majorityof this section of roadway.Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the original project limits asshown in Figure 1. The project included a 1.35mile long urbanized street corridor. The existing road section wasoriginally constructed in 1990. The revised project limits will add approximately 850 feet of street and utilities to therehabilitation project.Figure 1: Project Area MapAs Minnewashta Parkway is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route the city will utilize State Aid fundingin addition to special assessments to finance the street improvements. The special assessments will be to benefitingproperties as defined by the City's Assessment Practice. Utility funds collected by the City will be used for funding theutility improvements.During the preliminary engineering it was determined the rehabilitation of the watermain and the two sanitaryforcemains dictated the surfacing rehabilitation technique change from a mill and overlay to a fulldepth reclamation. The most effective trenchless utility rehabilitation method was identified in the feasibility report to be pipe bursting. This installation technique will require excavations at bend locations, services, hydrants, and boring pits every 300400feet depending on conditions encountered and the contractor. The overall amount of excavations and associated curbremovals affect the feasibility of a mill and overlay project and make a fulldepth reclamation project more effective.The current pavement overall condition index (OCI) is 63 which is within the range where overlays should beconsidered. The road is heavily patched and would score a lower OCI if the road was not constantly patched. Staffhas received many complaints about the surface condition of the roadway. The preliminary geotechnical informationindicated the surfacing improvements for the street section could be accomplished via a mill and overlay in areas thatdid not require significant excavation for utility improvements. The original intent was to replace only the cast ironwatermain per City policy and to minimize the amount of excavations. The break history in the utilities identifiedproblems mostly in the ductile iron sections. Hence, it was determined the entire length of the watermain and the twoforcemains needed to be replaced to avoid future breaks under the new pavement. The selection of an appropriatetrenchless installation method allows the project to use a fulldepth reclamation method in lieu of making it a fullreconstruction project. UTILITIESWatermain:The existing main is 12inch cast iron and ductile iron pipe of early 1970's vintage. The city's policy is to replaceexisting cast iron watermain when a street project occurs due to past history, existing soil conditions, and the attributesassociated with the material. The existing watermain has had 10 breaks associated with it since 2001. The break locations are identified in Figure 2 below. The most recent break was repaired in December 2018 and the location is not indicated on the map. Figure 2: Water Main Break Map (since 2001) The location of the cast iron pipe within the project limits is within the northern half of the street length. The majority of the breaks are in the southern half of the street length that is ductile iron pipe. The consultant and the City agreed the entire watermain needed to be replaced as part of the project. This was determined due to the break analysis, soil conditions, age of the pipe, and the opportunity for replacement due to the need for a project. It would likely be another 20 to 30 years before another replacement opportunity would be available. Sanitary Sewer: The existing sanitary sewer consists of 8inch and 10inch PVC pipe. The city has had all of the sanitary mains televised within the last 10 years. The remaining pipe sections that had not been recently televised were completed in 2018. The consultant reviewed and analyzed the sewer video and reports to determine the necessary repairs. Several sections of gravity main will be lined as part of the project. Inflow and infiltration barriers will be installed on all manholes. In conjunction with the city, the consultant distributed a survey to properties along the project in regards to identifying sewer and drainage concerns. Within the survey, the city inquired if there were any known issues with their sanitary service lateral and offered to televise the residents' lateral to determine if there are any existing concerns. There are two sanitary lift stations (LS#6 & LS#7) along Minnewashta Parkway. The forcemains associated with each lift station were analyzed. The forcemains' condition was determined to require replacement. The most effective forcemain replacement method was determined to be pipe bursting. Directional drilling a new main and structural CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectResolutions 2020XX & 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 2002:Award Contract and Approve Assessment RollSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.1.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202002PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution accepting the bids for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No.2002 and awarding the contract to Lametti and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $3,691,889.00.The City Council adopts a resolution adopting the assessment roll for the Minnewashta Parkway RehabilitationProject No. 2002.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYOn October 26, 2018, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project.On November 8, 2018, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Minnewashta Parkway project.On January 14, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with KimleyHorn and Associates andauthorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project.On October 14, 2019, the City Council accepted the feasibility study and called a public hearing to be held onOctober 28, 2019.On October 28, 2019, the City Council held a public hearing and authorized preparation of plans and specifications.On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Victoria.On February 10, 2020, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorizingadvertisement for bids.On March 6, 2020, staff opened and read aloud bids for the project.BACKGROUNDMinnewashta Parkway is a collector street located on the west side of Lake Minnewashta between Highway 5 andHighway 7. The roadway and utilities are in need of rehabilitation. The City's 2019 Capital Improvement Planplanned for the rehabilitation of Minnewashta Parkway in 2020. The original project limits on the north end extendedfrom the south side of the intersection with State Trunk Highway 7 to the City limits on the south end near theintersection of Hawthorne Circle. Hawthorne Circle south to State Trunk Highway 5 was thought at the time to be thejurisdiction of the City of Victoria. The plan was to collaborate with the City of Victoria to rehabilitate this section ofroadway to facilitate a continuous improvement project from Highway 7 to Highway 5.During the preliminary project design process, staff researched and identified that the City of Chanhassen owns rightofway within Victoria for Minnewashta Parkway. In 1992, at the request of the Cities of Chanhassen and Victoria,the Municipal Board of the State of Minnesota concluded the rightofway for Minnewashta Parkway betweenHawthorne Circle and State Trunk Highway 5 would be ceded from the City of Victoria to the City of Chanhassen. This allowed Minnewashta Parkway to be eligible for StateAid funding and Chanhassen subsequently adding thelength of Minnewashta Parkway to their MSA road segments.Due to this finding, the project limits were revised to include the section of Minnewashta Parkway between HawthorneCircle and 77th Street West. The section of Minnewashta Parkway between 77th Street West and the rightofwayfor Highway 5 is not in need of rehabilitation. In addition, sanitary sewer and water utilities are not under the majorityof this section of roadway.Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the original project limits asshown in Figure 1. The project included a 1.35mile long urbanized street corridor. The existing road section wasoriginally constructed in 1990. The revised project limits will add approximately 850 feet of street and utilities to therehabilitation project.Figure 1: Project Area MapAs Minnewashta Parkway is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route the city will utilize State Aid fundingin addition to special assessments to finance the street improvements. The special assessments will be to benefitingproperties as defined by the City's Assessment Practice. Utility funds collected by the City will be used for funding theutility improvements.During the preliminary engineering it was determined the rehabilitation of the watermain and the two sanitaryforcemains dictated the surfacing rehabilitation technique change from a mill and overlay to a fulldepth reclamation. The most effective trenchless utility rehabilitation method was identified in the feasibility report to be pipe bursting. This installation technique will require excavations at bend locations, services, hydrants, and boring pits every 300400feet depending on conditions encountered and the contractor. The overall amount of excavations and associated curbremovals affect the feasibility of a mill and overlay project and make a fulldepth reclamation project more effective.The current pavement overall condition index (OCI) is 63 which is within the range where overlays should beconsidered. The road is heavily patched and would score a lower OCI if the road was not constantly patched. Staffhas received many complaints about the surface condition of the roadway. The preliminary geotechnical informationindicated the surfacing improvements for the street section could be accomplished via a mill and overlay in areas thatdid not require significant excavation for utility improvements. The original intent was to replace only the cast ironwatermain per City policy and to minimize the amount of excavations. The break history in the utilities identifiedproblems mostly in the ductile iron sections. Hence, it was determined the entire length of the watermain and the twoforcemains needed to be replaced to avoid future breaks under the new pavement. The selection of an appropriatetrenchless installation method allows the project to use a fulldepth reclamation method in lieu of making it a fullreconstruction project. UTILITIESWatermain:The existing main is 12inch cast iron and ductile iron pipe of early 1970's vintage. The city's policy is to replaceexisting cast iron watermain when a street project occurs due to past history, existing soil conditions, and the attributesassociated with the material. The existing watermain has had 10 breaks associated with it since 2001. The break locations are identified in Figure 2below. The most recent break was repaired in December 2018 and the location is not indicated on the map. Figure 2: Water Main Break Map (since 2001)The location of the cast iron pipe within the project limits is within the northern half of the street length. The majority ofthe breaks are in the southern half of the street length that is ductile iron pipe. The consultant and the City agreed theentire watermain needed to be replaced as part of the project. This was determined due to the break analysis, soilconditions, age of the pipe, and the opportunity for replacement due to the need for a project. It would likely beanother 20 to 30 years before another replacement opportunity would be available.Sanitary Sewer:The existing sanitary sewer consists of 8inch and 10inch PVC pipe. The city has had all of the sanitary mainstelevised within the last 10 years. The remaining pipe sections that had not been recently televised were completed in2018. The consultant reviewed and analyzed the sewer video and reports to determine the necessary repairs. Severalsections of gravity main will be lined as part of the project. Inflow and infiltration barriers will be installed on allmanholes.In conjunction with the city, the consultant distributed a survey to properties along the project in regards to identifyingsewer and drainage concerns. Within the survey, the city inquired if there were any known issues with their sanitaryservice lateral and offered to televise the residents' lateral to determine if there are any existing concerns.There are two sanitary lift stations (LS#6 & LS#7) along Minnewashta Parkway. The forcemains associated with each lift station were analyzed. The forcemains' condition was determined to require replacement. The most effective forcemain replacement method was determined to be pipe bursting. Directional drilling a new main and structural lining methods were also considered. Storm Sewer: The existing storm sewer system was reviewed and analyzed from an existing capacity perspective utilizing updated Atlas14 precipitation data. In addition, the system was compared to any expected future capacity needs. The existing storm sewer capacity was determined to be sufficient to convey a 10year storm event including the future redevelopment needs. The consultant reviewed the existing storm sewer structures and determined there are 69 structures that require maintenance or replacement. Drain tile has been added behind the existing curbing in several areas with connections made to the existing storm system. Low areas, geotechnical data, historical observations, and the resident survey results were used to identify wet areas where tiling can help protect the roadway. Surface water management was another focus during design. There are seven stormwater ponds adjacent to Minnewashta Parkway where no improvements or work has been completed since the 1990's. The consultant reviewed our existing data relative to the ponds and visited the site with staff. Three ponds adjacent to Lake St. Joe were hydraulically modeled. One of these ponds was very small, has completely failed, and is essentially no longer a pond. This has been addressed by adding a sump manhole in the roadway and reconstructing the storm piping towards Lake St. Joe because this was not a good location for a pond. The other two ponds will be cleaned out and improved. The storm system improvements were designed to current NPDES and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) requirements in regards to water quality treatment and best management practices for stormwater runoff. Potential treatment and abstraction through infiltration, capture and reuse, or other methods were all considered. The consultant also reviewed city and MCWD wetland protection plans for design requirements. A standalone Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been designed by the consultant. Retaining Walls The condition of the existing retaining walls along the corridor was evaluated by a structural engineer. Overall, the walls are generally in good condition but some of them require improvements. Repair of some existing fencing or the addition of new fencing along the top of the walls was a common deficiency and will be a construction element. FUNDING Budget for the proposed work had been included in the 2019 CIP for the project to be constructed in 2020. Through the design process it was necessary to review and update the CIP in addition to the project planning relative to the schedule based upon construction needs and cost estimates after the preliminary design identified changes to the initial assumptions related to the rehabilitation project. The project increased in scope in several ways. The length of the project increased due to the 850foot addition through Victoria, the watermain replacement length nearly doubled, the replacement of both forcemains was determined to be necessary, and the utility improvements required the pavement rehabilitation to be modified from a mill and overlay to a full depth reclamation. The project is a twoyear construction project to facilitate the completion of the necessary work within a reasonable time frame and to allow the funding to be spread out over a twoyear period. Funding for the project is proposed to come from Municipal State Aid funds, special assessments to properties directly benefiting from the project, and city utility funds. SCHEDULE The remaining proposed project schedule is as follows: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectResolutions 2020XX & 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 2002:Award Contract and Approve Assessment RollSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.1.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202002PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution accepting the bids for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No.2002 and awarding the contract to Lametti and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $3,691,889.00.The City Council adopts a resolution adopting the assessment roll for the Minnewashta Parkway RehabilitationProject No. 2002.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYOn October 26, 2018, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project.On November 8, 2018, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Minnewashta Parkway project.On January 14, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with KimleyHorn and Associates andauthorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project.On October 14, 2019, the City Council accepted the feasibility study and called a public hearing to be held onOctober 28, 2019.On October 28, 2019, the City Council held a public hearing and authorized preparation of plans and specifications.On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Victoria.On February 10, 2020, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorizingadvertisement for bids.On March 6, 2020, staff opened and read aloud bids for the project.BACKGROUNDMinnewashta Parkway is a collector street located on the west side of Lake Minnewashta between Highway 5 andHighway 7. The roadway and utilities are in need of rehabilitation. The City's 2019 Capital Improvement Planplanned for the rehabilitation of Minnewashta Parkway in 2020. The original project limits on the north end extendedfrom the south side of the intersection with State Trunk Highway 7 to the City limits on the south end near theintersection of Hawthorne Circle. Hawthorne Circle south to State Trunk Highway 5 was thought at the time to be thejurisdiction of the City of Victoria. The plan was to collaborate with the City of Victoria to rehabilitate this section ofroadway to facilitate a continuous improvement project from Highway 7 to Highway 5.During the preliminary project design process, staff researched and identified that the City of Chanhassen owns rightofway within Victoria for Minnewashta Parkway. In 1992, at the request of the Cities of Chanhassen and Victoria,the Municipal Board of the State of Minnesota concluded the rightofway for Minnewashta Parkway betweenHawthorne Circle and State Trunk Highway 5 would be ceded from the City of Victoria to the City of Chanhassen. This allowed Minnewashta Parkway to be eligible for StateAid funding and Chanhassen subsequently adding thelength of Minnewashta Parkway to their MSA road segments.Due to this finding, the project limits were revised to include the section of Minnewashta Parkway between HawthorneCircle and 77th Street West. The section of Minnewashta Parkway between 77th Street West and the rightofwayfor Highway 5 is not in need of rehabilitation. In addition, sanitary sewer and water utilities are not under the majorityof this section of roadway.Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the original project limits asshown in Figure 1. The project included a 1.35mile long urbanized street corridor. The existing road section wasoriginally constructed in 1990. The revised project limits will add approximately 850 feet of street and utilities to therehabilitation project.Figure 1: Project Area MapAs Minnewashta Parkway is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route the city will utilize State Aid fundingin addition to special assessments to finance the street improvements. The special assessments will be to benefitingproperties as defined by the City's Assessment Practice. Utility funds collected by the City will be used for funding theutility improvements.During the preliminary engineering it was determined the rehabilitation of the watermain and the two sanitaryforcemains dictated the surfacing rehabilitation technique change from a mill and overlay to a fulldepth reclamation. The most effective trenchless utility rehabilitation method was identified in the feasibility report to be pipe bursting. This installation technique will require excavations at bend locations, services, hydrants, and boring pits every 300400feet depending on conditions encountered and the contractor. The overall amount of excavations and associated curbremovals affect the feasibility of a mill and overlay project and make a fulldepth reclamation project more effective.The current pavement overall condition index (OCI) is 63 which is within the range where overlays should beconsidered. The road is heavily patched and would score a lower OCI if the road was not constantly patched. Staffhas received many complaints about the surface condition of the roadway. The preliminary geotechnical informationindicated the surfacing improvements for the street section could be accomplished via a mill and overlay in areas thatdid not require significant excavation for utility improvements. The original intent was to replace only the cast ironwatermain per City policy and to minimize the amount of excavations. The break history in the utilities identifiedproblems mostly in the ductile iron sections. Hence, it was determined the entire length of the watermain and the twoforcemains needed to be replaced to avoid future breaks under the new pavement. The selection of an appropriatetrenchless installation method allows the project to use a fulldepth reclamation method in lieu of making it a fullreconstruction project. UTILITIESWatermain:The existing main is 12inch cast iron and ductile iron pipe of early 1970's vintage. The city's policy is to replaceexisting cast iron watermain when a street project occurs due to past history, existing soil conditions, and the attributesassociated with the material. The existing watermain has had 10 breaks associated with it since 2001. The break locations are identified in Figure 2below. The most recent break was repaired in December 2018 and the location is not indicated on the map. Figure 2: Water Main Break Map (since 2001)The location of the cast iron pipe within the project limits is within the northern half of the street length. The majority ofthe breaks are in the southern half of the street length that is ductile iron pipe. The consultant and the City agreed theentire watermain needed to be replaced as part of the project. This was determined due to the break analysis, soilconditions, age of the pipe, and the opportunity for replacement due to the need for a project. It would likely beanother 20 to 30 years before another replacement opportunity would be available.Sanitary Sewer:The existing sanitary sewer consists of 8inch and 10inch PVC pipe. The city has had all of the sanitary mainstelevised within the last 10 years. The remaining pipe sections that had not been recently televised were completed in2018. The consultant reviewed and analyzed the sewer video and reports to determine the necessary repairs. Severalsections of gravity main will be lined as part of the project. Inflow and infiltration barriers will be installed on allmanholes.In conjunction with the city, the consultant distributed a survey to properties along the project in regards to identifyingsewer and drainage concerns. Within the survey, the city inquired if there were any known issues with their sanitaryservice lateral and offered to televise the residents' lateral to determine if there are any existing concerns.There are two sanitary lift stations (LS#6 & LS#7) along Minnewashta Parkway. The forcemains associated with eachlift station were analyzed. The forcemains' condition was determined to require replacement. The most effectiveforcemain replacement method was determined to be pipe bursting. Directional drilling a new main and structurallining methods were also considered. Storm Sewer:The existing storm sewer system was reviewed and analyzed from an existing capacity perspective utilizing updatedAtlas14 precipitation data. In addition, the system was compared to any expected future capacity needs. Theexisting storm sewer capacity was determined to be sufficient to convey a 10year storm event including the futureredevelopment needs. The consultant reviewed the existing storm sewer structures and determined there are 69structures that require maintenance or replacement.Drain tile has been added behind the existing curbing in several areas with connections made to the existing stormsystem. Low areas, geotechnical data, historical observations, and the resident survey results were used to identifywet areas where tiling can help protect the roadway.Surface water management was another focus during design. There are seven stormwater ponds adjacent toMinnewashta Parkway where no improvements or work has been completed since the 1990's. The consultantreviewed our existing data relative to the ponds and visited the site with staff.Three ponds adjacent to Lake St. Joe were hydraulically modeled. One of these ponds was very small, hascompletely failed, and is essentially no longer a pond. This has been addressed by adding a sump manhole in theroadway and reconstructing the storm piping towards Lake St. Joe because this was not a good location for a pond. The other two ponds will be cleaned out and improved.The storm system improvements were designed to current NPDES and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) requirements in regards to water quality treatment and best management practices for stormwater runoff. Potential treatment and abstraction through infiltration, capture and reuse, or other methods were all considered. Theconsultant also reviewed city and MCWD wetland protection plans for design requirements. A standalone StormwaterPollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been designed by the consultant.Retaining WallsThe condition of the existing retaining walls along the corridor was evaluated by a structural engineer. Overall, thewalls are generally in good condition but some of them require improvements. Repair of some existing fencing or theaddition of new fencing along the top of the walls was a common deficiency and will be a construction element.FUNDINGBudget for the proposed work had been included in the 2019 CIP for the project to be constructed in 2020. Throughthe design process it was necessary to review and update the CIP in addition to the project planning relative to theschedule based upon construction needs and cost estimates after the preliminary design identified changes to the initialassumptions related to the rehabilitation project.The project increased in scope in several ways. The length of the project increased due to the 850foot additionthrough Victoria, the watermain replacement length nearly doubled, the replacement of both forcemains wasdetermined to be necessary, and the utility improvements required the pavement rehabilitation to be modified from amill and overlay to a full depth reclamation.The project is a twoyear construction project to facilitate the completion of the necessary work within a reasonabletime frame and to allow the funding to be spread out over a twoyear period.Funding for the project is proposed to come from Municipal State Aid funds, special assessments to propertiesdirectly benefiting from the project, and city utility funds.SCHEDULE The remaining proposed project schedule is as follows: Milestone Date Start Construction Spring 2020 Construction Complete October 2021 DISCUSSION Bid Opening Five bids were received, opened and read aloud for the project on Friday, March 6, 2020. The bids were checked for mathematical accuracy and tabulated, and there were only minor errors made on the proposal forms. The final Engineer's Estimate was $4,217,342.00. The bid tabulation indicates the low bidder was Lametti & Sons, Inc. from Hugo, Minnesota with a bid amount of $3,691,889.00. Below is a summary of the five bids received: Bidder Bid Amount Lametti and Sons, Inc.$3,691,889.00 S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc.$3,924,072.55 Park Construction Company $5,237,890.52 GMH Asphalt Corporation $5,312,235.10 Northwest Asphalt $5,855,023.70 Policy Decision/Action To Be Considered Prior to completion of the assessment hearing, any property owner who wants to object to their assessment must file a signed written objection or they waive their right to appeal. The Council may accept or modify the assessment amount as presented. Assessment Hearing Procedure Per MN State Statute requirements, notices were mailed to properties proposed to be assessed on April 8, 2019. An affidavit of mailing is included in the attachments. The Assessment Hearing was also published in the Chanhassen Villager on April 9, 2020. The affidavit of publication will not be available until May when the Chanhassen Villager sends out invoices; however, the publication is attached. Staff will provide a brief explanation of the work along with the proposed assessment amount. Any issues that the City Council wishes to discuss regarding the project financing is appropriate during the public hearing portion of the project. Public testimony should be received for the project. The property owners should be reminded that if they desire to object to their assessment; they must file a signed written objection with the city either prior to or during the actual public hearing for the project. Objections after the public hearing are invalid. An assessment objection is a request by the property owner for the Council to review the assessment amount. Staff may have an immediate response to individual comments. If the City Council feels an objection cannot be addressed immediately, the objection should be received and referred to staff for investigation. The remaining assessment roll should be adopted in order for the project to stay on schedule. At the next City Council meeting, a report will be presented to Council regarding all objections. If there are no objections filed, or if Council feels staff’s investigation will not result in any changes being made to the assessment roll, a motion by the City Council to adopt the assessment roll as prepared is needed for the project. Assessment Objections Objections may be filed up to and at the public hearing. At the time of this submittal, no written objections have been CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectResolutions 2020XX & 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 2002:Award Contract and Approve Assessment RollSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.1.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202002PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution accepting the bids for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No.2002 and awarding the contract to Lametti and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $3,691,889.00.The City Council adopts a resolution adopting the assessment roll for the Minnewashta Parkway RehabilitationProject No. 2002.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYOn October 26, 2018, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project.On November 8, 2018, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Minnewashta Parkway project.On January 14, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with KimleyHorn and Associates andauthorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project.On October 14, 2019, the City Council accepted the feasibility study and called a public hearing to be held onOctober 28, 2019.On October 28, 2019, the City Council held a public hearing and authorized preparation of plans and specifications.On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Victoria.On February 10, 2020, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorizingadvertisement for bids.On March 6, 2020, staff opened and read aloud bids for the project.BACKGROUNDMinnewashta Parkway is a collector street located on the west side of Lake Minnewashta between Highway 5 andHighway 7. The roadway and utilities are in need of rehabilitation. The City's 2019 Capital Improvement Planplanned for the rehabilitation of Minnewashta Parkway in 2020. The original project limits on the north end extendedfrom the south side of the intersection with State Trunk Highway 7 to the City limits on the south end near theintersection of Hawthorne Circle. Hawthorne Circle south to State Trunk Highway 5 was thought at the time to be thejurisdiction of the City of Victoria. The plan was to collaborate with the City of Victoria to rehabilitate this section ofroadway to facilitate a continuous improvement project from Highway 7 to Highway 5.During the preliminary project design process, staff researched and identified that the City of Chanhassen owns rightofway within Victoria for Minnewashta Parkway. In 1992, at the request of the Cities of Chanhassen and Victoria,the Municipal Board of the State of Minnesota concluded the rightofway for Minnewashta Parkway betweenHawthorne Circle and State Trunk Highway 5 would be ceded from the City of Victoria to the City of Chanhassen. This allowed Minnewashta Parkway to be eligible for StateAid funding and Chanhassen subsequently adding thelength of Minnewashta Parkway to their MSA road segments.Due to this finding, the project limits were revised to include the section of Minnewashta Parkway between HawthorneCircle and 77th Street West. The section of Minnewashta Parkway between 77th Street West and the rightofwayfor Highway 5 is not in need of rehabilitation. In addition, sanitary sewer and water utilities are not under the majorityof this section of roadway.Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the original project limits asshown in Figure 1. The project included a 1.35mile long urbanized street corridor. The existing road section wasoriginally constructed in 1990. The revised project limits will add approximately 850 feet of street and utilities to therehabilitation project.Figure 1: Project Area MapAs Minnewashta Parkway is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route the city will utilize State Aid fundingin addition to special assessments to finance the street improvements. The special assessments will be to benefitingproperties as defined by the City's Assessment Practice. Utility funds collected by the City will be used for funding theutility improvements.During the preliminary engineering it was determined the rehabilitation of the watermain and the two sanitaryforcemains dictated the surfacing rehabilitation technique change from a mill and overlay to a fulldepth reclamation. The most effective trenchless utility rehabilitation method was identified in the feasibility report to be pipe bursting. This installation technique will require excavations at bend locations, services, hydrants, and boring pits every 300400feet depending on conditions encountered and the contractor. The overall amount of excavations and associated curbremovals affect the feasibility of a mill and overlay project and make a fulldepth reclamation project more effective.The current pavement overall condition index (OCI) is 63 which is within the range where overlays should beconsidered. The road is heavily patched and would score a lower OCI if the road was not constantly patched. Staffhas received many complaints about the surface condition of the roadway. The preliminary geotechnical informationindicated the surfacing improvements for the street section could be accomplished via a mill and overlay in areas thatdid not require significant excavation for utility improvements. The original intent was to replace only the cast ironwatermain per City policy and to minimize the amount of excavations. The break history in the utilities identifiedproblems mostly in the ductile iron sections. Hence, it was determined the entire length of the watermain and the twoforcemains needed to be replaced to avoid future breaks under the new pavement. The selection of an appropriatetrenchless installation method allows the project to use a fulldepth reclamation method in lieu of making it a fullreconstruction project. UTILITIESWatermain:The existing main is 12inch cast iron and ductile iron pipe of early 1970's vintage. The city's policy is to replaceexisting cast iron watermain when a street project occurs due to past history, existing soil conditions, and the attributesassociated with the material. The existing watermain has had 10 breaks associated with it since 2001. The break locations are identified in Figure 2below. The most recent break was repaired in December 2018 and the location is not indicated on the map. Figure 2: Water Main Break Map (since 2001)The location of the cast iron pipe within the project limits is within the northern half of the street length. The majority ofthe breaks are in the southern half of the street length that is ductile iron pipe. The consultant and the City agreed theentire watermain needed to be replaced as part of the project. This was determined due to the break analysis, soilconditions, age of the pipe, and the opportunity for replacement due to the need for a project. It would likely beanother 20 to 30 years before another replacement opportunity would be available.Sanitary Sewer:The existing sanitary sewer consists of 8inch and 10inch PVC pipe. The city has had all of the sanitary mainstelevised within the last 10 years. The remaining pipe sections that had not been recently televised were completed in2018. The consultant reviewed and analyzed the sewer video and reports to determine the necessary repairs. Severalsections of gravity main will be lined as part of the project. Inflow and infiltration barriers will be installed on allmanholes.In conjunction with the city, the consultant distributed a survey to properties along the project in regards to identifyingsewer and drainage concerns. Within the survey, the city inquired if there were any known issues with their sanitaryservice lateral and offered to televise the residents' lateral to determine if there are any existing concerns.There are two sanitary lift stations (LS#6 & LS#7) along Minnewashta Parkway. The forcemains associated with eachlift station were analyzed. The forcemains' condition was determined to require replacement. The most effectiveforcemain replacement method was determined to be pipe bursting. Directional drilling a new main and structurallining methods were also considered. Storm Sewer:The existing storm sewer system was reviewed and analyzed from an existing capacity perspective utilizing updatedAtlas14 precipitation data. In addition, the system was compared to any expected future capacity needs. Theexisting storm sewer capacity was determined to be sufficient to convey a 10year storm event including the futureredevelopment needs. The consultant reviewed the existing storm sewer structures and determined there are 69structures that require maintenance or replacement.Drain tile has been added behind the existing curbing in several areas with connections made to the existing stormsystem. Low areas, geotechnical data, historical observations, and the resident survey results were used to identifywet areas where tiling can help protect the roadway.Surface water management was another focus during design. There are seven stormwater ponds adjacent toMinnewashta Parkway where no improvements or work has been completed since the 1990's. The consultantreviewed our existing data relative to the ponds and visited the site with staff.Three ponds adjacent to Lake St. Joe were hydraulically modeled. One of these ponds was very small, hascompletely failed, and is essentially no longer a pond. This has been addressed by adding a sump manhole in theroadway and reconstructing the storm piping towards Lake St. Joe because this was not a good location for a pond. The other two ponds will be cleaned out and improved.The storm system improvements were designed to current NPDES and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) requirements in regards to water quality treatment and best management practices for stormwater runoff. Potential treatment and abstraction through infiltration, capture and reuse, or other methods were all considered. Theconsultant also reviewed city and MCWD wetland protection plans for design requirements. A standalone StormwaterPollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been designed by the consultant.Retaining WallsThe condition of the existing retaining walls along the corridor was evaluated by a structural engineer. Overall, thewalls are generally in good condition but some of them require improvements. Repair of some existing fencing or theaddition of new fencing along the top of the walls was a common deficiency and will be a construction element.FUNDINGBudget for the proposed work had been included in the 2019 CIP for the project to be constructed in 2020. Throughthe design process it was necessary to review and update the CIP in addition to the project planning relative to theschedule based upon construction needs and cost estimates after the preliminary design identified changes to the initialassumptions related to the rehabilitation project.The project increased in scope in several ways. The length of the project increased due to the 850foot additionthrough Victoria, the watermain replacement length nearly doubled, the replacement of both forcemains wasdetermined to be necessary, and the utility improvements required the pavement rehabilitation to be modified from amill and overlay to a full depth reclamation.The project is a twoyear construction project to facilitate the completion of the necessary work within a reasonabletime frame and to allow the funding to be spread out over a twoyear period.Funding for the project is proposed to come from Municipal State Aid funds, special assessments to propertiesdirectly benefiting from the project, and city utility funds.SCHEDULEThe remaining proposed project schedule is as follows:Milestone DateStart Construction Spring 2020Construction Complete October 2021DISCUSSIONBid OpeningFive bids were received, opened and read aloud for the project on Friday, March 6, 2020. The bids were checkedfor mathematical accuracy and tabulated, and there were only minor errors made on the proposal forms. The finalEngineer's Estimate was $4,217,342.00. The bid tabulation indicates the low bidder was Lametti & Sons, Inc. fromHugo, Minnesota with a bid amount of $3,691,889.00. Below is a summary of the five bids received:Bidder Bid AmountLametti and Sons, Inc.$3,691,889.00S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc.$3,924,072.55Park Construction Company $5,237,890.52GMH Asphalt Corporation $5,312,235.10Northwest Asphalt $5,855,023.70Policy Decision/Action To Be ConsideredPrior to completion of the assessment hearing, any property owner who wants to object to their assessment must file asigned written objection or they waive their right to appeal. The Council may accept or modify the assessment amountas presented. Assessment Hearing ProcedurePer MN State Statute requirements, notices were mailed to properties proposed to be assessed on April 8, 2019. Anaffidavit of mailing is included in the attachments. The Assessment Hearing was also published in the ChanhassenVillageron April 9, 2020. The affidavit of publication will not be available until May when the Chanhassen Villagersends out invoices; however, the publication is attached.Staff will provide a brief explanation of the work along with the proposed assessment amount. Any issues that the CityCouncil wishes to discuss regarding the project financing is appropriate during the public hearing portion of theproject. Public testimony should be received for the project. The property owners should be reminded that if theydesire to object to their assessment; they must file a signed written objection with the city either prior to or during theactual public hearing for the project. Objections after the public hearing are invalid.An assessment objection is a request by the property owner for the Council to review the assessment amount. Staffmay have an immediate response to individual comments. If the City Council feels an objection cannot be addressedimmediately, the objection should be received and referred to staff for investigation. The remaining assessment rollshould be adopted in order for the project to stay on schedule. At the next City Council meeting, a report will bepresented to Council regarding all objections.If there are no objections filed, or if Council feels staff’s investigation will not result in any changes being made to theassessment roll, a motion by the City Council to adopt the assessment roll as prepared is needed for the project. Assessment Objections Objections may be filed up to and at the public hearing. At the time of this submittal, no written objections have been received. If any written objections are received in the interim prior to the Council meeting, they will be provided to the Council at the public hearing. Staff comments and recommendations will also be provided at the public hearing. The City Council may choose to adopt staff’s recommendation or revise the assessment roll. If additional objections are filed either prior to or at the hearing, they should be received and if necessary referred to staff for investigation and resolution. Special Assessments A 'Residential Equivalency' component has been factored into the assessment amount to account for two things relative to keeping the assessment calculation fair to the benefiting properties and in compliance with the intent of the assessment practice. One is the additional capacity. The use of StateAid funding requires the road section be designed for a 10ton per axle capacity. Residential streets in Chanhassen are designed for a 7ton per axle capacity. The additional 3ton of capacity has not been included in the assessable street cost that is included in the assessment calculation. The second item that has been factored into the assessment calculation is the street frontage. Only the frontage relative to the benefiting properties has been been included in the assessment calculation. The frontage of the benefiting properties is 61% of the overall frontage along the project. Hence, the assessable street cost for a 7ton design was reduced to 61% of the total street cost. In this manner, the benefiting properties are not paying for the entire length of the roadway due to there being a limited number of benefiting properties along the collector roadway. This component is included to be fair to the benefiting properties because it is a goal of the City to eliminate accesses along collector roadways. There was not a need to include a factor for the overall street width because Minnewashta Parkway averages a width of 31 feet. Per the City's assessment practice, only 40% of the assessable street cost is charged to the benefiting properties. Most recently, the City has used similar residential equivalent calculation methodologies on other collector roadways such as Lake Lucy Road, Kerber Boulevard, and Laredo Drive. Per the city’s Assessment Practice, 40% of the street costs are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting properties in addition to the methodology described previously of a 'Residential Equivalency'. As the project schedule is to take place over the course of 2020 and 2021 (Phase 1 and Phase 2, respectively), properties will be assessed for the year in which the phase of construction abutting their property is conducted. The attached final assessment roll enumerate the properties being assessed in Phase 1, and the attached assessment map illustrates which properties are within Phase 1 and Phase 2; the "break point" being Kings Road. When each phase's assessments take affect, they are proposed for an 8year term at an interest rate of 5.25% in accordance with the City Assessment Policy. The interest rate is calculated at the prime rate at the time of the bid opening plus 2%. Total Street Improvement Cost $619,400.00 Assessable Cost @ 61% of ROW Frontage $377,834.00 Amount to Be Assessed (40% of street cost)$150,960.00 Total Assessable Units 37 Total Assessable Cost per Unit $4,080.00 Funding for the project will come from city funds, state aid funds, and special assessments. The total project cost can be broken down as follows: Construction Cost $3,691,889.00 Engineering and Administration Cost*$ 535,000.00 Total $4,226,889.00 *The Engineering and Administration costs are estimated because the final amount will be based on actual costs that include construction services that have yet to be completed. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council adopt two resolutions. One resolution should accept the bids and award the CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectResolutions 2020XX & 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 2002:Award Contract and Approve Assessment RollSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.1.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202002PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution accepting the bids for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No.2002 and awarding the contract to Lametti and Sons, Inc. in the amount of $3,691,889.00.The City Council adopts a resolution adopting the assessment roll for the Minnewashta Parkway RehabilitationProject No. 2002.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYOn October 26, 2018, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project.On November 8, 2018, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Minnewashta Parkway project.On January 14, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with KimleyHorn and Associates andauthorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project.On October 14, 2019, the City Council accepted the feasibility study and called a public hearing to be held onOctober 28, 2019.On October 28, 2019, the City Council held a public hearing and authorized preparation of plans and specifications.On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Victoria.On February 10, 2020, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorizingadvertisement for bids.On March 6, 2020, staff opened and read aloud bids for the project.BACKGROUNDMinnewashta Parkway is a collector street located on the west side of Lake Minnewashta between Highway 5 andHighway 7. The roadway and utilities are in need of rehabilitation. The City's 2019 Capital Improvement Planplanned for the rehabilitation of Minnewashta Parkway in 2020. The original project limits on the north end extendedfrom the south side of the intersection with State Trunk Highway 7 to the City limits on the south end near theintersection of Hawthorne Circle. Hawthorne Circle south to State Trunk Highway 5 was thought at the time to be thejurisdiction of the City of Victoria. The plan was to collaborate with the City of Victoria to rehabilitate this section ofroadway to facilitate a continuous improvement project from Highway 7 to Highway 5.During the preliminary project design process, staff researched and identified that the City of Chanhassen owns rightofway within Victoria for Minnewashta Parkway. In 1992, at the request of the Cities of Chanhassen and Victoria,the Municipal Board of the State of Minnesota concluded the rightofway for Minnewashta Parkway betweenHawthorne Circle and State Trunk Highway 5 would be ceded from the City of Victoria to the City of Chanhassen. This allowed Minnewashta Parkway to be eligible for StateAid funding and Chanhassen subsequently adding thelength of Minnewashta Parkway to their MSA road segments.Due to this finding, the project limits were revised to include the section of Minnewashta Parkway between HawthorneCircle and 77th Street West. The section of Minnewashta Parkway between 77th Street West and the rightofwayfor Highway 5 is not in need of rehabilitation. In addition, sanitary sewer and water utilities are not under the majorityof this section of roadway.Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the original project limits asshown in Figure 1. The project included a 1.35mile long urbanized street corridor. The existing road section wasoriginally constructed in 1990. The revised project limits will add approximately 850 feet of street and utilities to therehabilitation project.Figure 1: Project Area MapAs Minnewashta Parkway is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route the city will utilize State Aid fundingin addition to special assessments to finance the street improvements. The special assessments will be to benefitingproperties as defined by the City's Assessment Practice. Utility funds collected by the City will be used for funding theutility improvements.During the preliminary engineering it was determined the rehabilitation of the watermain and the two sanitaryforcemains dictated the surfacing rehabilitation technique change from a mill and overlay to a fulldepth reclamation. The most effective trenchless utility rehabilitation method was identified in the feasibility report to be pipe bursting. This installation technique will require excavations at bend locations, services, hydrants, and boring pits every 300400feet depending on conditions encountered and the contractor. The overall amount of excavations and associated curbremovals affect the feasibility of a mill and overlay project and make a fulldepth reclamation project more effective.The current pavement overall condition index (OCI) is 63 which is within the range where overlays should beconsidered. The road is heavily patched and would score a lower OCI if the road was not constantly patched. Staffhas received many complaints about the surface condition of the roadway. The preliminary geotechnical informationindicated the surfacing improvements for the street section could be accomplished via a mill and overlay in areas thatdid not require significant excavation for utility improvements. The original intent was to replace only the cast ironwatermain per City policy and to minimize the amount of excavations. The break history in the utilities identifiedproblems mostly in the ductile iron sections. Hence, it was determined the entire length of the watermain and the twoforcemains needed to be replaced to avoid future breaks under the new pavement. The selection of an appropriatetrenchless installation method allows the project to use a fulldepth reclamation method in lieu of making it a fullreconstruction project. UTILITIESWatermain:The existing main is 12inch cast iron and ductile iron pipe of early 1970's vintage. The city's policy is to replaceexisting cast iron watermain when a street project occurs due to past history, existing soil conditions, and the attributesassociated with the material. The existing watermain has had 10 breaks associated with it since 2001. The break locations are identified in Figure 2below. The most recent break was repaired in December 2018 and the location is not indicated on the map. Figure 2: Water Main Break Map (since 2001)The location of the cast iron pipe within the project limits is within the northern half of the street length. The majority ofthe breaks are in the southern half of the street length that is ductile iron pipe. The consultant and the City agreed theentire watermain needed to be replaced as part of the project. This was determined due to the break analysis, soilconditions, age of the pipe, and the opportunity for replacement due to the need for a project. It would likely beanother 20 to 30 years before another replacement opportunity would be available.Sanitary Sewer:The existing sanitary sewer consists of 8inch and 10inch PVC pipe. The city has had all of the sanitary mainstelevised within the last 10 years. The remaining pipe sections that had not been recently televised were completed in2018. The consultant reviewed and analyzed the sewer video and reports to determine the necessary repairs. Severalsections of gravity main will be lined as part of the project. Inflow and infiltration barriers will be installed on allmanholes.In conjunction with the city, the consultant distributed a survey to properties along the project in regards to identifyingsewer and drainage concerns. Within the survey, the city inquired if there were any known issues with their sanitaryservice lateral and offered to televise the residents' lateral to determine if there are any existing concerns.There are two sanitary lift stations (LS#6 & LS#7) along Minnewashta Parkway. The forcemains associated with eachlift station were analyzed. The forcemains' condition was determined to require replacement. The most effectiveforcemain replacement method was determined to be pipe bursting. Directional drilling a new main and structurallining methods were also considered. Storm Sewer:The existing storm sewer system was reviewed and analyzed from an existing capacity perspective utilizing updatedAtlas14 precipitation data. In addition, the system was compared to any expected future capacity needs. Theexisting storm sewer capacity was determined to be sufficient to convey a 10year storm event including the futureredevelopment needs. The consultant reviewed the existing storm sewer structures and determined there are 69structures that require maintenance or replacement.Drain tile has been added behind the existing curbing in several areas with connections made to the existing stormsystem. Low areas, geotechnical data, historical observations, and the resident survey results were used to identifywet areas where tiling can help protect the roadway.Surface water management was another focus during design. There are seven stormwater ponds adjacent toMinnewashta Parkway where no improvements or work has been completed since the 1990's. The consultantreviewed our existing data relative to the ponds and visited the site with staff.Three ponds adjacent to Lake St. Joe were hydraulically modeled. One of these ponds was very small, hascompletely failed, and is essentially no longer a pond. This has been addressed by adding a sump manhole in theroadway and reconstructing the storm piping towards Lake St. Joe because this was not a good location for a pond. The other two ponds will be cleaned out and improved.The storm system improvements were designed to current NPDES and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) requirements in regards to water quality treatment and best management practices for stormwater runoff. Potential treatment and abstraction through infiltration, capture and reuse, or other methods were all considered. Theconsultant also reviewed city and MCWD wetland protection plans for design requirements. A standalone StormwaterPollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been designed by the consultant.Retaining WallsThe condition of the existing retaining walls along the corridor was evaluated by a structural engineer. Overall, thewalls are generally in good condition but some of them require improvements. Repair of some existing fencing or theaddition of new fencing along the top of the walls was a common deficiency and will be a construction element.FUNDINGBudget for the proposed work had been included in the 2019 CIP for the project to be constructed in 2020. Throughthe design process it was necessary to review and update the CIP in addition to the project planning relative to theschedule based upon construction needs and cost estimates after the preliminary design identified changes to the initialassumptions related to the rehabilitation project.The project increased in scope in several ways. The length of the project increased due to the 850foot additionthrough Victoria, the watermain replacement length nearly doubled, the replacement of both forcemains wasdetermined to be necessary, and the utility improvements required the pavement rehabilitation to be modified from amill and overlay to a full depth reclamation.The project is a twoyear construction project to facilitate the completion of the necessary work within a reasonabletime frame and to allow the funding to be spread out over a twoyear period.Funding for the project is proposed to come from Municipal State Aid funds, special assessments to propertiesdirectly benefiting from the project, and city utility funds.SCHEDULEThe remaining proposed project schedule is as follows:Milestone DateStart Construction Spring 2020Construction Complete October 2021DISCUSSIONBid OpeningFive bids were received, opened and read aloud for the project on Friday, March 6, 2020. The bids were checkedfor mathematical accuracy and tabulated, and there were only minor errors made on the proposal forms. The finalEngineer's Estimate was $4,217,342.00. The bid tabulation indicates the low bidder was Lametti & Sons, Inc. fromHugo, Minnesota with a bid amount of $3,691,889.00. Below is a summary of the five bids received:Bidder Bid AmountLametti and Sons, Inc.$3,691,889.00S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc.$3,924,072.55Park Construction Company $5,237,890.52GMH Asphalt Corporation $5,312,235.10Northwest Asphalt $5,855,023.70Policy Decision/Action To Be ConsideredPrior to completion of the assessment hearing, any property owner who wants to object to their assessment must file asigned written objection or they waive their right to appeal. The Council may accept or modify the assessment amountas presented. Assessment Hearing ProcedurePer MN State Statute requirements, notices were mailed to properties proposed to be assessed on April 8, 2019. Anaffidavit of mailing is included in the attachments. The Assessment Hearing was also published in the ChanhassenVillageron April 9, 2020. The affidavit of publication will not be available until May when the Chanhassen Villagersends out invoices; however, the publication is attached.Staff will provide a brief explanation of the work along with the proposed assessment amount. Any issues that the CityCouncil wishes to discuss regarding the project financing is appropriate during the public hearing portion of theproject. Public testimony should be received for the project. The property owners should be reminded that if theydesire to object to their assessment; they must file a signed written objection with the city either prior to or during theactual public hearing for the project. Objections after the public hearing are invalid.An assessment objection is a request by the property owner for the Council to review the assessment amount. Staffmay have an immediate response to individual comments. If the City Council feels an objection cannot be addressedimmediately, the objection should be received and referred to staff for investigation. The remaining assessment rollshould be adopted in order for the project to stay on schedule. At the next City Council meeting, a report will bepresented to Council regarding all objections.If there are no objections filed, or if Council feels staff’s investigation will not result in any changes being made to theassessment roll, a motion by the City Council to adopt the assessment roll as prepared is needed for the project. Assessment ObjectionsObjections may be filed up to and at the public hearing. At the time of this submittal, no written objections have beenreceived. If any written objections are received in the interim prior to the Council meeting, they will be provided to theCouncil at the public hearing. Staff comments and recommendations will also be provided at the public hearing. TheCity Council may choose to adopt staff’s recommendation or revise the assessment roll. If additional objections arefiled either prior to or at the hearing, they should be received and if necessary referred to staff for investigation andresolution.Special AssessmentsA 'Residential Equivalency' component has been factored into the assessment amount to account for two things relativeto keeping the assessment calculation fair to the benefiting properties and in compliance with the intent of theassessment practice. One is the additional capacity. The use of StateAid funding requires the road section bedesigned for a 10ton per axle capacity. Residential streets in Chanhassen are designed for a 7ton per axle capacity. The additional 3ton of capacity has not been included in the assessable street cost that is included in the assessmentcalculation. The second item that has been factored into the assessment calculation is the street frontage. Only thefrontage relative to the benefiting properties has been been included in the assessment calculation. The frontage of thebenefiting properties is 61% of the overall frontage along the project. Hence, the assessable street cost for a 7tondesign was reduced to 61% of the total street cost. In this manner, the benefiting properties are not paying for theentire length of the roadway due to there being a limited number of benefiting properties along the collector roadway. This component is included to be fair to the benefiting properties because it is a goal of the City to eliminate accessesalong collector roadways. There was not a need to include a factor for the overall street width because MinnewashtaParkway averages a width of 31 feet. Per the City's assessment practice, only 40% of the assessable street cost ischarged to the benefiting properties.Most recently, the City has used similar residential equivalent calculation methodologies on other collector roadwayssuch as Lake Lucy Road, Kerber Boulevard, and Laredo Drive.Per the city’s Assessment Practice, 40% of the street costs are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting propertiesin addition to the methodology described previously of a 'Residential Equivalency'. As the project schedule is to takeplace over the course of 2020 and 2021 (Phase 1 and Phase 2, respectively), properties will be assessed for the yearin which the phase of construction abutting their property is conducted. The attached final assessment roll enumeratethe properties being assessed in Phase 1, and the attached assessment map illustrates which properties are withinPhase 1 and Phase 2; the "break point" being Kings Road. When each phase's assessments take affect, they areproposed for an 8year term at an interest rate of 5.25% in accordance with the City Assessment Policy. The interestrate is calculated at the prime rate at the time of the bid opening plus 2%. Total Street Improvement Cost $619,400.00Assessable Cost @ 61% of ROW Frontage $377,834.00Amount to Be Assessed (40% of street cost)$150,960.00Total Assessable Units 37Total Assessable Cost per Unit $4,080.00Funding for the project will come from city funds, state aid funds, and special assessments. The total project cost can bebroken down as follows:Construction Cost $3,691,889.00Engineering and Administration Cost*$ 535,000.00Total$4,226,889.00*The Engineering and Administration costs are estimated because the final amount will be based on actual costs thatinclude construction services that have yet to be completed.RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council adopt two resolutions. One resolution should accept the bids and award the project to Lametti & Sons in the amount of $3,691,889.00. The second resolution should adopt the assessment roll. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Accept Bids & Award Contract Resolution Adopt Assessment Roll CIP Sheet Bid Tabulation Affidavit of Mailing of Proposed Assessments Publication for Assessment Hearing Final Assessment Roll Assessment Map (Phase 1 & 2) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: April 27, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY PROJECT NO. 20-02 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Project No. 20-02 (Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project), bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Bidder Bid Amount Lametti and Sons, Inc. $3,691,889.00 S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. $3,924,072.55 Park Construction Company $5,237,890.52 GMH Asphalt Corporation $5,312,235.10 Northwest Asphalt $5,855,023.70 WHEREAS, Lametti and Sons, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder with a total bid awarded of $3,691,889.00; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council: 1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Lametti and Sons, Inc. in the name of the City of Chanhassen for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 20-02 according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the city clerk. 2. The city clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 27th day of April, 2020. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: April 27, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PHASE I OF THE MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITION PROJECT NO. 20-02 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for Phase I of the improvement of: Minnewashta Parkway NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Chanhassen, Minnesota: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of eight (8) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2021, and shall bear interest at the rate of 5.25 percent (5.25%) per annum. This assessment will appear on the first property tax statement for 2020. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from November 24, 2020 until December 31, 2020. To each subsequent installment, when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 23, 2020; and the owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the city treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. If the property owner decides not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of interest that will apply is 5.25 percent (5.25%) per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment is not available. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 27th day of April, 2020. 2 ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT BID TABULATION Contract: Owner: Project: Item No Mn/DOT No. Item Description Unit Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 200,000.00$ 200,000.00$ 150,000.00$ 150,000.00$ 175,000.00$ 175,000.00$ 465,600.00$ 465,600.00$ 235,000.00$ 235,000.00$ 881,114.00$ 881,114.00$ 2 2101.505 CLEARING ACRE 0.3 3,000.00$ 900.00$ 1,000.00$ 300.00$ 10,500.00$ 3,150.00$ 10,600.00$ 3,180.00$ 12,000.00$ 3,600.00$ 11,000.00$ 3,300.00$ 3 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 0.15 2,500.00$ 375.00$ 2,000.00$ 300.00$ 2,100.00$ 315.00$ 2,120.00$ 318.00$ 2,500.00$ 375.00$ 22,000.00$ 3,300.00$ 4 2101.524 CLEARING TREE 31 500.00$ 15,500.00$ 230.00$ 7,130.00$ 240.00$ 7,440.00$ 244.00$ 7,564.00$ 305.00$ 9,455.00$ 440.00$ 13,640.00$ 5 2101.524 GRUBBING TREE 31 500.00$ 15,500.00$ 100.00$ 3,100.00$ 105.00$ 3,255.00$ 106.00$ 3,286.00$ 116.00$ 3,596.00$ 165.00$ 5,115.00$ 6 2101.624 REMOVE ASH TREE TREE 1 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 500.00$ 500.00$ 520.00$ 520.00$ 530.00$ 530.00$ 580.00$ 580.00$ 550.00$ 550.00$ 7 2104.502 REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN EACH 21 500.00$ 10,500.00$ 205.00$ 4,305.00$ 330.00$ 6,930.00$ 750.00$ 15,750.00$ 825.00$ 17,325.00$ 500.00$ 10,500.00$ 8 2104.502 REMOVE CASTING EACH 23 250.00$ 5,750.00$ 200.00$ 4,600.00$ 120.00$ 2,760.00$ 259.00$ 5,957.00$ 407.00$ 9,361.00$ 100.00$ 2,300.00$ 9 2104.502 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 39 300.00$ 11,700.00$ 200.00$ 7,800.00$ 150.00$ 5,850.00$ 2,250.00$ 87,750.00$ 2,500.00$ 97,500.00$ 400.00$ 15,600.00$ 10 2104.502 REMOVE CURB STOP & BOX EACH 45 500.00$ 22,500.00$ 200.00$ 9,000.00$ 150.00$ 6,750.00$ 750.00$ 33,750.00$ 825.00$ 37,125.00$ 50.00$ 2,250.00$ 11 2104.502 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 13 800.00$ 10,400.00$ 200.00$ 2,600.00$ 560.00$ 7,280.00$ 1,500.00$ 19,500.00$ 1,650.00$ 21,450.00$ 500.00$ 6,500.00$ 12 2104.502 REMOVE TRASH GUARD EACH 5 100.00$ 500.00$ 200.00$ 1,000.00$ 158.00$ 790.00$ 165.00$ 825.00$ 181.00$ 905.00$ 100.00$ 500.00$ 13 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 150 5.00$ 750.00$ 2.50$ 375.00$ 6.00$ 900.00$ 5.30$ 795.00$ 5.00$ 750.00$ 5.00$ 750.00$ 14 2104.503 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 800 4.00$ 3,200.00$ 2.00$ 1,600.00$ 4.25$ 3,400.00$ 4.25$ 3,400.00$ 2.55$ 2,040.00$ 3.00$ 2,400.00$ 15 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAIN LIN FT 900 10.00$ 9,000.00$ 8.25$ 7,425.00$ 17.90$ 16,110.00$ 18.10$ 16,290.00$ 20.55$ 18,495.00$ 10.00$ 9,000.00$ 16 2104.503 REMOVE WATER MAIN SERVICE LIN FT 1335 5.00$ 6,675.00$ 8.00$ 10,680.00$ 17.40$ 23,229.00$ 18.10$ 24,163.50$ 20.55$ 27,434.25$ 5.00$ 6,675.00$ 17 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) LIN FT 20 25.00$ 500.00$ 24.00$ 480.00$ 27.50$ 550.00$ 37.50$ 750.00$ 45.00$ 900.00$ 20.00$ 400.00$ 18 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (SANITARY) LIN FT 40 50.00$ 2,000.00$ 24.00$ 960.00$ 25.50$ 1,020.00$ 75.10$ 3,004.00$ 85.00$ 3,400.00$ 20.00$ 800.00$ 19 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LIN FT 4000 10.00$ 40,000.00$ 2.00$ 8,000.00$ 2.50$ 10,000.00$ 8.50$ 34,000.00$ 10.00$ 40,000.00$ 6.79$ 27,160.00$ 20 2104.503 REPAIR WOODEN FENCE LIN FT 380 45.00$ 17,100.00$ 26.00$ 9,880.00$ 38.00$ 14,440.00$ 27.60$ 10,488.00$ 30.15$ 11,457.00$ 28.60$ 10,868.00$ 21 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ YD 200 10.00$ 2,000.00$ 4.00$ 800.00$ 3.75$ 750.00$ 17.70$ 3,540.00$ 10.25$ 2,050.00$ 16.35$ 3,270.00$ 22 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQ YD 225 15.00$ 3,375.00$ 5.00$ 1,125.00$ 6.80$ 1,530.00$ 16.50$ 3,712.50$ 10.25$ 2,306.25$ 21.80$ 4,905.00$ 23 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 4700 4.00$ 18,800.00$ 4.00$ 18,800.00$ 3.30$ 15,510.00$ 6.35$ 29,845.00$ 1.00$ 4,700.00$ 2.68$ 12,596.00$ 24 2104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK SQ FT 9500 1.00$ 9,500.00$ 0.50$ 4,750.00$ 0.40$ 3,800.00$ 1.40$ 13,300.00$ 1.10$ 10,450.00$ 0.91$ 8,645.00$ 25 2104.601 REMOVE RETAINING WALL LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 650.00$ 650.00$ 12,300.00$ 12,300.00$ 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 26 2104.602 ABANDON SANITARY SERVICE EACH 16 850.00$ 13,600.00$ 300.00$ 4,800.00$ 1,900.00$ 30,400.00$ 1,530.00$ 24,480.00$ 1,700.00$ 27,200.00$ 200.00$ 3,200.00$ 27 2104.603 ABANDON WATER MAIN LIN FT 550 10.00$ 5,500.00$ 9.00$ 4,950.00$ 15.50$ 8,525.00$ 23.20$ 12,760.00$ 26.00$ 14,300.00$ 10.00$ 5,500.00$ 28 2105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE 5 SQ YD 2750 2.00$ 5,500.00$ 1.00$ 2,750.00$ 1.30$ 3,575.00$ 4.70$ 12,925.00$ 2.00$ 5,500.00$ 1.50$ 4,125.00$ 29 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV) CU YD 2125 20.00$ 42,500.00$ 13.00$ 27,625.00$ 20.00$ 42,500.00$ 40.60$ 86,275.00$ 30.00$ 63,750.00$ 32.40$ 68,850.00$ 30 2105.507 CHANNEL AND POND EXCAVATION (LV) CU YD 140 75.00$ 10,500.00$ 39.00$ 5,460.00$ 18.50$ 2,590.00$ 30.80$ 4,312.00$ 150.00$ 21,000.00$ 70.00$ 9,800.00$ 31 2130.523 WATER M GALLON 300 50.00$ 15,000.00$ 19.00$ 5,700.00$ 60.00$ 18,000.00$ 29.50$ 8,850.00$ 55.00$ 16,500.00$ 25.00$ 7,500.00$ 32 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 CU YD 1280 15.00$ 19,200.00$ 27.00$ 34,560.00$ 40.00$ 51,200.00$ 40.70$ 52,096.00$ 14.00$ 17,920.00$ 29.73$ 38,054.40$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION SAP 194-111-002 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Lametti and Sons, Inc. Northwest AsphaltPark Construction CompanyS.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. GMH Asphalt Corporation BID TABULATION Contract: Owner: Project: CITY OF CHANHASSEN MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION SAP 194-111-002 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Lametti and Sons, Inc. Northwest AsphaltPark Construction CompanyS.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. GMH Asphalt Corporation 33 2211.607 OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CU YD 1730 40.00$ 69,200.00$ 37.00$ 64,010.00$ 72.00$ 124,560.00$ 76.00$ 131,480.00$ 65.00$ 112,450.00$ 42.58$ 73,663.40$ 34 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 23000 4.00$ 92,000.00$ 0.60$ 13,800.00$ 3.40$ 78,200.00$ 5.45$ 125,350.00$ 5.00$ 115,000.00$ 3.90$ 89,700.00$ 35 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION - TRAIL SQ YD 5000 4.00$ 20,000.00$ 0.60$ 3,000.00$ 4.25$ 21,250.00$ 3.05$ 15,250.00$ 6.00$ 30,000.00$ 1.30$ 6,500.00$ 36 2301.602 DRILL & GROUT REINF BAR (EPOXY COATED) EACH 96 25.00$ 2,400.00$ 12.00$ 1,152.00$ 11.00$ 1,056.00$ 12.90$ 1,238.40$ 14.00$ 1,344.00$ 13.00$ 1,248.00$ 37 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3;C) TON 3200 75.00$ 240,000.00$ 84.00$ 268,800.00$ 90.00$ 288,000.00$ 92.20$ 295,040.00$ 85.25$ 272,800.00$ 76.79$ 245,728.00$ 38 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3;C) TON 4800 70.00$ 336,000.00$ 74.00$ 355,200.00$ 79.00$ 379,200.00$ 87.20$ 418,560.00$ 80.50$ 386,400.00$ 71.49$ 343,152.00$ 39 2360.604 TEMPORARY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 500 35.00$ 17,500.00$ 13.00$ 6,500.00$ 24.00$ 12,000.00$ 18.30$ 9,150.00$ 100.00$ 50,000.00$ 31.52$ 15,760.00$ 40 2411.601 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL LUMP SUM 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 26,300.00$ 26,300.00$ 28,400.00$ 28,400.00$ 45,000.00$ 45,000.00$ 41 2501.606 CHEMICAL GROUT GALLON 120 200.00$ 24,000.00$ 90.00$ 10,800.00$ 10.50$ 1,260.00$ 8.65$ 1,038.00$ 9.25$ 1,110.00$ 8.80$ 1,056.00$ 42 2502.503 4" PERF TP PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 2200 15.00$ 33,000.00$ 12.00$ 26,400.00$ 7.00$ 15,400.00$ 24.00$ 52,800.00$ 26.25$ 57,750.00$ 19.20$ 42,240.00$ 43 2502.601 IRRIGATION SYSTEM PROVISION LUMP SUM 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 44 2503.602 AIR RELIEF MANHOLE EACH 2 4,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 12,400.00$ 24,800.00$ 8,100.00$ 16,200.00$ 13,900.00$ 27,800.00$ 15,200.00$ 30,400.00$ 12,221.00$ 24,442.00$ 45 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 56 500.00$ 28,000.00$ 182.00$ 10,192.00$ 1,150.00$ 64,400.00$ 1,500.00$ 84,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 112,000.00$ 900.00$ 50,400.00$ 46 2503.602 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE REPAIR EACH 10 2,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 2,645.00$ 26,450.00$ 1,030.00$ 10,300.00$ 3,300.00$ 33,000.00$ 3,700.00$ 37,000.00$ 1,140.00$ 11,400.00$ 47 2503.602 INSTALL I & I BARRIER EACH 33 500.00$ 16,500.00$ 1,320.00$ 43,560.00$ 430.00$ 14,190.00$ 273.00$ 9,009.00$ 200.00$ 6,600.00$ 150.00$ 4,950.00$ 48 2503.602 RECONSTRUCT INSIDE DROP EACH 2 3,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 2,750.00$ 5,500.00$ 5,040.00$ 10,080.00$ 5,525.00$ 11,050.00$ 3,287.00$ 6,574.00$ 49 2503.602 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 15 1,500.00$ 22,500.00$ 1,800.00$ 27,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 37,500.00$ 1,540.00$ 23,100.00$ 1,700.00$ 25,500.00$ 2,390.00$ 35,850.00$ 50 2503.602 CONNECT TO INPLACE LIFT STATION EACH 2 5,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 4,200.00$ 8,400.00$ 3,200.00$ 6,400.00$ 7,910.00$ 15,820.00$ 8,650.00$ 17,300.00$ 3,610.00$ 7,220.00$ 51 2503.603 LINING SEWER PIPE 8" LIN FT 1550 35.00$ 54,250.00$ 44.00$ 68,200.00$ 30.00$ 46,500.00$ 46.50$ 72,075.00$ 50.00$ 77,500.00$ 47.00$ 72,850.00$ 52 2503.603 LINING SEWER PIPE 10" LIN FT 265 50.00$ 13,250.00$ 75.00$ 19,875.00$ 56.00$ 14,840.00$ 87.60$ 23,214.00$ 94.00$ 24,910.00$ 89.10$ 23,611.50$ 53 2503.603 LINING SEWER PIPE 12" LIN FT 200 60.00$ 12,000.00$ 102.00$ 20,400.00$ 48.50$ 9,700.00$ 72.50$ 14,500.00$ 78.00$ 15,600.00$ 73.70$ 14,740.00$ 54 2503.603 CONST SANITARY STRUCTURE DESIGN 4007 LIN FT 20 500.00$ 10,000.00$ 500.00$ 10,000.00$ 600.00$ 12,000.00$ 550.00$ 11,000.00$ 605.00$ 12,100.00$ 405.00$ 8,100.00$ 55 2503.603 4" HDPE (SDR 11) SANITARY FORCE MAIN - TRENCHLESSLIN FT 410 60.00$ 24,600.00$ 57.00$ 23,370.00$ 62.50$ 25,625.00$ 105.00$ 43,050.00$ 115.00$ 47,150.00$ 73.75$ 30,237.50$ 56 2503.603 6" HDPE (SDR 11) SANITARY FORCE MAIN - TRENCHLESSLIN FT 1410 75.00$ 105,750.00$ 70.00$ 98,700.00$ 57.00$ 80,370.00$ 95.40$ 134,514.00$ 105.00$ 148,050.00$ 108.55$ 153,055.50$ 57 2503.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUND 5000 10.00$ 50,000.00$ 9.00$ 45,000.00$ 15.25$ 76,250.00$ 10.80$ 54,000.00$ 12.00$ 60,000.00$ 19.74$ 98,700.00$ 58 2504.601 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE LUMP SUM 1 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 36,800.00$ 36,800.00$ 78,700.00$ 78,700.00$ 100,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 96,250.00$ 96,250.00$ 59 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 15 2,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 1,020.00$ 15,300.00$ 1,325.00$ 19,875.00$ 2,030.00$ 30,450.00$ 2,225.00$ 33,375.00$ 1,885.00$ 28,275.00$ 60 2504.602 HYDRANT EACH 13 5,000.00$ 65,000.00$ 5,060.00$ 65,780.00$ 4,350.00$ 56,550.00$ 6,170.00$ 80,210.00$ 6,750.00$ 87,750.00$ 7,785.00$ 101,205.00$ 61 2504.602 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH 43 300.00$ 12,900.00$ 532.00$ 22,876.00$ 670.00$ 28,810.00$ 947.00$ 40,721.00$ 1,040.00$ 44,720.00$ 1,450.00$ 62,350.00$ 62 2504.602 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 24 2,000.00$ 48,000.00$ 1,832.00$ 43,968.00$ 1,830.00$ 43,920.00$ 3,760.00$ 90,240.00$ 4,105.00$ 98,520.00$ 1,810.00$ 43,440.00$ 63 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 4 2,500.00$ 10,000.00$ 2,220.00$ 8,880.00$ 2,250.00$ 9,000.00$ 4,310.00$ 17,240.00$ 4,800.00$ 19,200.00$ 2,236.00$ 8,944.00$ 64 2504.602 10" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 2 3,500.00$ 7,000.00$ 2,800.00$ 5,600.00$ 3,150.00$ 6,300.00$ 5,100.00$ 10,200.00$ 5,625.00$ 11,250.00$ 3,029.00$ 6,058.00$ 65 2504.602 12" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 9 4,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 3,500.00$ 31,500.00$ 3,900.00$ 35,100.00$ 6,160.00$ 55,440.00$ 6,800.00$ 61,200.00$ 4,018.00$ 36,162.00$ BID TABULATION Contract: Owner: Project: CITY OF CHANHASSEN MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION SAP 194-111-002 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Lametti and Sons, Inc. Northwest AsphaltPark Construction CompanyS.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. GMH Asphalt Corporation 66 2504.602 1" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 43 500.00$ 21,500.00$ 660.00$ 28,380.00$ 800.00$ 34,400.00$ 1,130.00$ 48,590.00$ 1,240.00$ 53,320.00$ 1,585.00$ 68,155.00$ 67 2504.602 TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH 60 150.00$ 9,000.00$ 20.00$ 1,200.00$ 575.00$ 34,500.00$ 531.00$ 31,860.00$ 638.00$ 38,280.00$ 605.00$ 36,300.00$ 68 2504.602 TELEVISE STORM SEWER CROSSING EACH 40 150.00$ 6,000.00$ 20.00$ 800.00$ 485.00$ 19,400.00$ 465.00$ 18,600.00$ 540.00$ 21,600.00$ 512.00$ 20,480.00$ 69 2504.603 6" PVC WATERMAIN LIN FT 285 40.00$ 11,400.00$ 41.00$ 11,685.00$ 65.00$ 18,525.00$ 40.10$ 11,428.50$ 44.00$ 12,540.00$ 38.77$ 11,049.45$ 70 2504.603 8" PVC WATERMAIN LIN FT 500 50.00$ 25,000.00$ 45.00$ 22,500.00$ 69.50$ 34,750.00$ 44.20$ 22,100.00$ 49.00$ 24,500.00$ 42.27$ 21,135.00$ 71 2504.603 10" PVC WATERMAIN LIN FT 25 50.00$ 1,250.00$ 49.00$ 1,225.00$ 74.50$ 1,862.50$ 74.00$ 1,850.00$ 81.00$ 2,025.00$ 61.50$ 1,537.50$ 72 2504.603 12" PVC WATERMAIN LIN FT 215 80.00$ 17,200.00$ 54.00$ 11,610.00$ 80.50$ 17,307.50$ 60.70$ 13,050.50$ 67.00$ 14,405.00$ 51.77$ 11,130.55$ 73 2504.603 WATER SERVICE - 1" PEX PIPE - TRENCHLESS LIN FT 1580 25.00$ 39,500.00$ 100.00$ 158,000.00$ 82.00$ 129,560.00$ 70.80$ 111,864.00$ 78.00$ 123,240.00$ 131.10$ 207,138.00$ 74 2504.603 12" HDPE SDR 11 WATERMAIN - TRENCHLESS LIN FT 7400 175.00$ 1,295,000.00$ 128.00$ 947,200.00$ 99.00$ 732,600.00$ 129.00$ 954,600.00$ 150.00$ 1,110,000.00$ 229.50$ 1,698,300.00$ 75 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 76 750.00$ 57,000.00$ 420.00$ 31,920.00$ 825.00$ 62,700.00$ 1,310.00$ 99,560.00$ 1,200.00$ 91,200.00$ 619.00$ 47,044.00$ 76 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH 48 350.00$ 16,800.00$ 420.00$ 20,160.00$ 345.00$ 16,560.00$ 901.00$ 43,248.00$ 1,200.00$ 57,600.00$ 0.01$ 0.48$ 77 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN G LIN FT 26.22 600.00$ 15,732.00$ 420.00$ 11,012.40$ 615.00$ 16,125.30$ 1,010.00$ 26,482.20$ 1,105.00$ 28,973.10$ 920.00$ 24,122.40$ 78 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 48-4020 LIN FT 46.82 500.00$ 23,410.00$ 430.00$ 20,132.60$ 565.00$ 26,453.30$ 981.00$ 45,930.42$ 1,075.00$ 50,331.50$ 881.00$ 41,248.42$ 79 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 60-4020 LIN FT 23.3 650.00$ 15,145.00$ 550.00$ 12,815.00$ 815.00$ 18,989.50$ 1,090.00$ 25,397.00$ 1,200.00$ 27,960.00$ 1,583.00$ 36,883.90$ 80 2506.503 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 84-4020 LIN FT 8 850.00$ 6,800.00$ 1,200.00$ 9,600.00$ 1,300.00$ 10,400.00$ 1,690.00$ 13,520.00$ 1,850.00$ 14,800.00$ 1,630.00$ 13,040.00$ 81 2506.602 RECONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 23 1,500.00$ 34,500.00$ 1,418.00$ 32,614.00$ 1,330.00$ 30,590.00$ 631.00$ 14,513.00$ 1,225.00$ 28,175.00$ 625.00$ 14,375.00$ 82 2506.602 GROUT MANHOLE EACH 24 500.00$ 12,000.00$ 918.00$ 22,032.00$ 450.00$ 10,800.00$ 671.00$ 16,104.00$ 725.00$ 17,400.00$ 682.00$ 16,368.00$ 83 2506.602 RECONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SPECIAL EACH 6 1,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 1,118.00$ 6,708.00$ 2,160.00$ 12,960.00$ 1,120.00$ 6,720.00$ 1,225.00$ 7,350.00$ 924.00$ 5,544.00$ 84 2511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III CU YD 10 100.00$ 1,000.00$ 153.00$ 1,530.00$ 135.00$ 1,350.00$ 183.00$ 1,830.00$ 150.00$ 1,500.00$ 100.00$ 1,000.00$ 85 2521.518 5" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 9600 10.00$ 96,000.00$ 6.00$ 57,600.00$ 7.00$ 67,200.00$ 8.00$ 76,800.00$ 9.00$ 86,400.00$ 7.69$ 73,824.00$ 86 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 4500 15.00$ 67,500.00$ 13.00$ 58,500.00$ 14.00$ 63,000.00$ 14.50$ 65,250.00$ 16.50$ 74,250.00$ 15.67$ 70,515.00$ 87 2521.518 3" BITUMINOUS WALK SQ FT 62000 1.75$ 108,500.00$ 1.60$ 99,200.00$ 1.75$ 108,500.00$ 3.10$ 192,200.00$ 2.00$ 124,000.00$ 2.16$ 133,920.00$ 88 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 LIN FT 4000 25.00$ 100,000.00$ 23.00$ 92,000.00$ 31.50$ 126,000.00$ 27.50$ 110,000.00$ 29.50$ 118,000.00$ 25.12$ 100,480.00$ 89 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB DESIGN V6 LIN FT 30 40.00$ 1,200.00$ 35.00$ 1,050.00$ 29.00$ 870.00$ 37.50$ 1,125.00$ 45.00$ 1,350.00$ 38.50$ 1,155.00$ 90 2531.604 8" CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER SQ YD 24 100.00$ 2,400.00$ 85.50$ 2,052.00$ 93.00$ 2,232.00$ 91.40$ 2,193.60$ 100.00$ 2,400.00$ 93.90$ 2,253.60$ 91 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 483 50.00$ 24,150.00$ 50.00$ 24,150.00$ 53.00$ 25,599.00$ 53.50$ 25,840.50$ 58.00$ 28,014.00$ 55.00$ 26,565.00$ 92 2557.603 WOODEN FENCE LIN FT 40 75.00$ 3,000.00$ 30.00$ 1,200.00$ 50.00$ 2,000.00$ 31.80$ 1,272.00$ 35.00$ 1,400.00$ 33.00$ 1,320.00$ 93 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 3,900.00$ 3,900.00$ 78,000.00$ 78,000.00$ 4,130.00$ 4,130.00$ 21,000.00$ 21,000.00$ 4,290.00$ 4,290.00$ 94 2564.602 FURNISH & INSTALL TRAFFIC WARNING SIGN EACH 2 2,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 9,340.00$ 18,680.00$ 3,330.00$ 6,660.00$ 9,900.00$ 19,800.00$ 11,000.00$ 22,000.00$ 10,274.00$ 20,548.00$ 95 2565.501 EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION SYSTEM LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 7,125.00$ 7,125.00$ 9,570.00$ 9,570.00$ 10,500.00$ 10,500.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 96 2565.616 TEMPORARY SIGNAL SYSTEM SYSTEM 1 70,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 79,300.00$ 79,300.00$ 92,000.00$ 92,000.00$ 82,280.00$ 82,280.00$ 97 2573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 10,200.00$ 10,200.00$ 1,350.00$ 1,350.00$ 8,370.00$ 8,370.00$ 3,800.00$ 3,800.00$ 3,750.00$ 3,750.00$ 98 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 70 150.00$ 10,500.00$ 220.00$ 15,400.00$ 230.00$ 16,100.00$ 233.00$ 16,310.00$ 140.00$ 9,800.00$ 125.00$ 8,750.00$ BID TABULATION Contract: Owner: Project: CITY OF CHANHASSEN MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION SAP 194-111-002 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Lametti and Sons, Inc. Northwest AsphaltPark Construction CompanyS.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. GMH Asphalt Corporation 99 2573.503 SILT FENCE; TYPE MS LIN FT 500 2.00$ 1,000.00$ 2.00$ 1,000.00$ 2.00$ 1,000.00$ 2.10$ 1,050.00$ 2.00$ 1,000.00$ 3.50$ 1,750.00$ 100 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD CHIP LIN FT 2400 3.50$ 8,400.00$ 3.00$ 7,200.00$ 2.50$ 6,000.00$ 3.20$ 7,680.00$ 4.65$ 11,160.00$ 3.50$ 8,400.00$ 101 2573.601 FLEXIBLE POND LEVELER LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,670.00$ 5,670.00$ 2,600.00$ 2,600.00$ 1,060.00$ 1,060.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 2,750.00$ 2,750.00$ 102 2574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 3 POUND 1925 1.50$ 2,887.50$ 1.00$ 1,925.00$ 0.60$ 1,155.00$ 0.90$ 1,732.50$ 0.50$ 962.50$ 1.00$ 1,925.00$ 103 2574.508 FERTILIZER TYPE 4 POUND 30 1.50$ 45.00$ 2.00$ 60.00$ 0.80$ 24.00$ 1.75$ 52.50$ 0.70$ 21.00$ 1.00$ 30.00$ 104 2575.504 SODDING TYPE LAWN SQ YD 400 15.00$ 6,000.00$ 10.00$ 4,000.00$ 7.50$ 3,000.00$ 24.70$ 9,880.00$ 48.50$ 19,400.00$ 22.45$ 8,980.00$ 105 2575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 3N SQ YD 1000 2.50$ 2,500.00$ 1.50$ 1,500.00$ 1.50$ 1,500.00$ 9.90$ 9,900.00$ 35.50$ 35,500.00$ 2.00$ 2,000.00$ 106 2575.505 SEEDING ACRE 5.7 500.00$ 2,850.00$ 1,250.00$ 7,125.00$ 156.00$ 889.20$ 1,330.00$ 7,581.00$ 1,160.00$ 6,612.00$ 1,750.00$ 9,975.00$ 107 2575.505 DISK ANCHORING ACRE 5.5 200.00$ 1,100.00$ 150.00$ 825.00$ 156.00$ 858.00$ 159.00$ 874.50$ 76.00$ 418.00$ 250.00$ 1,375.00$ 108 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 25-151 POUND 660 5.00$ 3,300.00$ 3.50$ 2,310.00$ 3.50$ 2,310.00$ 3.60$ 2,376.00$ 3.75$ 2,475.00$ 3.00$ 1,980.00$ 109 2575.508 SEED MIXTURE 33-261 POUND 7 50.00$ 350.00$ 30.00$ 210.00$ 29.00$ 203.00$ 31.20$ 218.40$ 27.00$ 189.00$ 25.00$ 175.00$ 110 2575.509 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 1 TON 11 200.00$ 2,200.00$ 350.00$ 3,850.00$ 312.00$ 3,432.00$ 371.00$ 4,081.00$ 405.00$ 4,455.00$ 250.00$ 2,750.00$ 111 2582.503 4" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP GR IN (WR) LIN FT 7125 1.50$ 10,687.50$ 1.00$ 7,125.00$ 1.15$ 8,193.75$ 1.15$ 8,193.75$ 1.25$ 8,906.25$ 1.19$ 8,478.75$ 112 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE PREF TAPE LIN FT 80 40.00$ 3,200.00$ 30.00$ 2,400.00$ 31.00$ 2,480.00$ 31.80$ 2,544.00$ 35.00$ 2,800.00$ 33.00$ 2,640.00$ 113 2582.518 CROSSWALK MULTI COMP GR IN (WR) SQ FT 1395 8.00$ 11,160.00$ 7.00$ 9,765.00$ 7.30$ 10,183.50$ 7.45$ 10,392.75$ 8.15$ 11,369.25$ 7.73$ 10,783.35$ Subtotal 4,217,342.00$ 3,691,889.00$ 3,924,072.55$ 5,237,890.52$ 5,312,235.10$ 5,855,023.70$ BID SUMMARY Description Amount ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 4,217,342.00$ 3,691,889.00$ 3,924,072.55$ 5,237,890.52$ 5,312,235.10$ 5,855,023.70$ Total Bid 4,217,342.00$ 3,691,889.00$ 3,924,072.55$ 5,237,890.52$ 5,312,235.10$ 5,855,023.70$ Lametti and Sons, Inc. Northwest AsphaltPark Construction CompanyS.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. GMH Asphalt Corporation CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVTT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on April 8,2020, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing on Proposed Assessments for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 20-02, to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver and Hennepin Counties, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records I\'rr*Tl,l1 .,,.1,,* Kt'"Tffiffi'\lerk Subscribed and sworn to before me thifi-r!^' day of A"os-i I .2020 Notary Public &ilr,1,tt, &ar 1i 619,400.00$ Total Assessable Right-of-Way 61% 377,834.00$ 10,210.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO.REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT A 650071200 SINGLE-FAMILY JEROLD & JEANETTE BOLEY (CITY OF VICTORIA)7414 1 40% $ 4,080.00 $ 4,080.00 B 650072400 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW BERRY (CITY OF VICTORIA)7410 1 40% $ 4,080.00 $ 4,080.00 1 250083100 SINGLE-FAMILY LOWELL A & KATHRYN L PETERSON 7411 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 2 253510250 SINGLE-FAMILY WADE BARON 7400 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 3 250082800 SINGLE-FAMILY FRITZ W & MARILYN E LARSON 7380 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 4 254980010 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH G LANGE 7361 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 5 250082610 SINGLE-FAMILY GRAIG D & JANIE S NORBY 7351 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 6 250082550 SINGLE-FAMILY JEREMY LANGEVIN 7331 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 7 250082900 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON E & CARRIE S LANDSTROM 7301 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 8 250081400 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK A & DONNA M MALINOWSKI 7250 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 9 250081500 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER J MANN 7231 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 10 250082100 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS P MANN 7211 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 11 250082000 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & MARY MANN 7221 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 12 250082300 SINGLE-FAMILY PETER MOE 7161 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 13 250080500 PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 14 250080400 SINGLE-FAMILY KEVIN R PROHASKA 7141 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 15 250081600 SINGLE-FAMILY STACY M GJETSON 3901 1 40% $ 4,080.00 4,080.00$ 16 250080600 SINGLE-FAMILY DARYL L KIRT 7052 0 40% $--$ 2 TOTAL 8,160.00$ 17 TOTAL 61,200$ 19 TOTAL 69,360$ BIDDING RESULTS - PHASE 1 ASSESSMENT ROLL CITY OF CHANHASSEN MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 2020-02 Phase 1 Phase 1 Assessment Totals Assesable Cost Roadway Assessment Total Estimated Roadway Cost (Phase 1 & 2) City of Chanhassen Assessments City of Victoria Assessments ROUNDHOUSEPARKSTRATFORD LNRED CEDAR POINT RD KINGS RDLAKE MINNEWASHTAGLENDALE DRLESLEE CURVEMINNEWASHTA PKWYLAKE SAINT JOERED CEDAR COVESTRATFORD RIDGE13121415161718192021222324262728171819202223152577TH ST LAKERIDGE RDTRISTAN DRHAWTHORNE CIRMAPLE SHORES DRLAKE SAINT JOEMINNEWASHTA PKWYCITY OF CHANHASSENCITY OF VICTORIAMI N N E W A S H T A C T HIGHWAY 5125367891110413123ABPUBLICHOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONSINGLE-FAMILYLEGENDSINGLE-FAMILY (CITY OF VICTORIA)NORTHMINNEWASHTA PARKWAYPROPOSED ASSESSMENT MAPEXHIBIT 6 - 1 OF 2K:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\MINNEWASHTA PKWY\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\After Feasibility\MINNE_CP20-20_FEAS_ASSESSMENT.dwg October 17, 2019 - 11:16am MINNEWASHTA PARKWAYREHABILITATIONCITY PROJECT NO. 2020-02 GLENDALE DRLINDEN CIRLANDINGS DRFIRESTATIONHIGHWAY 7LESLEE CURVEMINNEWASHTA PKWYLAKE MINNEWASHTAROCKY ISLAND LN2122232426272928303132333435363738222325PUBLICHOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONSINGLE-FAMILYLEGENDSINGLE-FAMILY (CITY OF VICTORIA)K:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\MINNEWASHTA PKWY\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\After Feasibility\MINNE_CP20-20_FEAS_ASSESSMENT.dwg October 17, 2019 - 11:16am MINNEWASHTA PARKWAYREHABILITATIONCITY PROJECT NO. 2020-02NORTHMINNEWASHTA PARKWAYPROPOSED ASSESSMENT MAPEXHIBIT 6 - 2 OF 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 27, 2020 Subject Resolution 2020XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Public Hearing Order Improvements and Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.2. Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202003 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council orders improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for the Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 2003.” Approval requires a 4/5 Vote. BACKGROUND On November 7, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) for consultant services for the project. On November 22, 2019, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professional services for the Lake Lucy Road project. On December 9, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with WSB & Associates and authorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project. On January 28, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project with the public. Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project. On April 13, 2020, the City Council accepted the feasibility report and ordered the Public Hearing. DISCUSSION Lake Lucy Road is a collector street located on the east side of Lake Minnewashta between State Highway 41 (Hazeltine Boulevard) and County Road 117 (Galpin Boulevard) and is in need of roadway pavement rehabilitation. The city's fiveyear Capital Improvement Plan has planned for the rehabilitation of Lake Lucy Road in 2020. Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits as shown in Figure 1. The project includes a 0.66mile long urbanized street corridor. The existing road section was originally constructed between 1994 and 1998. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectResolution 2020XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Public Hearing OrderImprovements and Authorize Preparation of Plans and SpecificationsSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.2.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202003PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council orders improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for the Lake Lucy RoadRehabilitation Project No. 2003.”Approval requires a 4/5 Vote.BACKGROUNDOn November 7, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On November 22, 2019, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Lake Lucy Road project.On December 9, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with WSB & Associates and authorizedpreparation of a feasibility study for the project.On January 28, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project with thepublic. Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project.On April 13, 2020, the City Council accepted the feasibility report and ordered the Public Hearing.DISCUSSIONLake Lucy Road is a collector street located on the east side of Lake Minnewashta between State Highway 41(Hazeltine Boulevard) and County Road 117 (Galpin Boulevard) and is in need of roadway pavementrehabilitation. The city's fiveyear Capital Improvement Plan has planned for the rehabilitation of Lake Lucy Road in2020. Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits asshown in Figure 1. The project includes a 0.66mile long urbanized street corridor. The existing road section was originally constructed between 1994 and 1998. Figure 1: Project Area Map Lake Lucy Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route. The city will utilize State Aid funding and special assessments to finance the street improvements. City utility funds will be used for funding any of the necessary utility improvements. The average pavement overall condition index (OCI) is 63, which is within the range where overlays should be considered. The western half of the section is a few years older and the associated OCI is lower than the eastern half. A Request for Proposals (RFP) for a geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributed by the Engineering department. American Engineering Testing, Inc. was hired to perform the work and prepare a geotechnical report for the project area. The report confirmed there is a pavement performance change about 350 feet east of Brendan Court. This confirms the different OCI ratings through the project area. The report attributes the differing pavement distresses observed between the western and eastern sections due to weaker supporting soils in the western half. The feasibility study in conjunction with the geotechnical report evaluated several different alternatives for pavement rehabilitation and recommended an alternativetype of a mill and overlay. A standard 2.5inch mill and overlay is recommended to be combined with a seal coat between the milled surface and new bituminous layer. This rehabilitation combination technique is known as a 'Texas Underseal.' The additional seal coat layer is intended to delay reflective cracking between the existing base layer and the new overlay. Two or three additional years of service life are expected to be gained by adding this technique to a standard mill and overlay. The weaker support soils in the western half will not be able to be fully corrected until a reconstruction project is performed. The 'Texas Underseal' is effectively intended to buy additional time for the service life of the pavement section. The trail along the corridor is intended to be rehabilitated via a full depth reclamation. Some spot repair of curb and gutter and other public utilities are also part of the project. All pedestrian ramps will be brought into ADA compliance in accordance with the ADA transition plan. A capacity analysis of the storm sewer system was performed to verify it was adequately designed to serve the area. The analysis verified the existing system meets current design standards and the updated NOAA Atlas14 rainfall model standard. A spread and run analysis was also performed for each catch basin to identify any ponding concerns on the roadway. The analysis identified three catch basin locations where an additional catch basin should be added to reduce temporary ponding during an intense rainfall event. Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer is not necessary. The valves on the watermain are planned to be rehabilitated by changing out the bolting on the valves. The age of the original installation indicates the bolting is likely to be mild steel. The bolts will be replaced with stainless steel to protect them long term from the corrosive soils found in Chanhassen. Minor repairs primarily related to reducing infiltration and inflow are recommended for the sanitary CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectResolution 2020XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Public Hearing OrderImprovements and Authorize Preparation of Plans and SpecificationsSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.2.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202003PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council orders improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for the Lake Lucy RoadRehabilitation Project No. 2003.”Approval requires a 4/5 Vote.BACKGROUNDOn November 7, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On November 22, 2019, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Lake Lucy Road project.On December 9, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with WSB & Associates and authorizedpreparation of a feasibility study for the project.On January 28, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project with thepublic. Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project.On April 13, 2020, the City Council accepted the feasibility report and ordered the Public Hearing.DISCUSSIONLake Lucy Road is a collector street located on the east side of Lake Minnewashta between State Highway 41(Hazeltine Boulevard) and County Road 117 (Galpin Boulevard) and is in need of roadway pavementrehabilitation. The city's fiveyear Capital Improvement Plan has planned for the rehabilitation of Lake Lucy Road in2020. Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits asshown in Figure 1. The project includes a 0.66mile long urbanized street corridor. The existing road section wasoriginally constructed between 1994 and 1998.Figure 1: Project Area MapLake Lucy Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route. The city will utilize State Aid funding andspecial assessments to finance the street improvements. City utility funds will be used for funding any of the necessaryutility improvements.The average pavement overall condition index (OCI) is 63, which is within the range where overlays should beconsidered. The western half of the section is a few years older and the associated OCI is lower than the easternhalf. A Request for Proposals (RFP) for a geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributedby the Engineering department. American Engineering Testing, Inc. was hired to perform the work and prepare ageotechnical report for the project area. The report confirmed there is a pavement performance change about 350feet east of Brendan Court. This confirms the different OCI ratings through the project area. The report attributes thediffering pavement distresses observed between the western and eastern sections due to weaker supporting soils in thewestern half.The feasibility study in conjunction with the geotechnical report evaluated several different alternatives for pavementrehabilitation and recommended an alternativetype of a mill and overlay. A standard 2.5inch mill and overlay isrecommended to be combined with a seal coat between the milled surface and new bituminous layer. Thisrehabilitation combination technique is known as a 'Texas Underseal.' The additional seal coat layer is intended todelay reflective cracking between the existing base layer and the new overlay. Two or three additional years of servicelife are expected to be gained by adding this technique to a standard mill and overlay. The weaker support soils in thewestern half will not be able to be fully corrected until a reconstruction project is performed. The 'Texas Underseal' iseffectively intended to buy additional time for the service life of the pavement section. The trail along the corridor isintended to be rehabilitated via a full depth reclamation.Some spot repair of curb and gutter and other public utilities are also part of the project. All pedestrian ramps will bebrought into ADA compliance in accordance with the ADA transition plan.A capacity analysis of the storm sewer system was performed to verify it was adequately designed to serve the area. The analysis verified the existing system meets current design standards and the updated NOAA Atlas14 rainfallmodel standard. A spread and run analysis was also performed for each catch basin to identify any ponding concernson the roadway. The analysis identified three catch basin locations where an additional catch basin should be added toreduce temporary ponding during an intense rainfall event.Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer is not necessary. The valves on the watermain are planned to berehabilitated by changing out the bolting on the valves. The age of the original installation indicates the bolting is likely to be mild steel. The bolts will be replaced with stainless steel to protect them long term from the corrosive soils found in Chanhassen. Minor repairs primarily related to reducing infiltration and inflow are recommended for the sanitary sewer system. An open house informational meeting for public involvement was held on January 28, 2020. As appropriate, comments received were factored into the preliminary design and are included in the feasibility report. Speeding along the corridor was the primary common concern. Staff commissioned a speed study to be performed along the corridor to analyze the concern. The study was conducted over a sevenday period in February. The actual speed was not displayed on the sign apparatus to the traveling public during the study in order to record typical traveled speeds along the corridor without inducing a natural slowing at the device. From an engineering perspective, the 85th percentile is used to determine if there is a speeding concern. The 85th percentile speed was at the 30mph speed limit with an average pace between 23 mph and 33 mph. The proposed improvements will also address current NPDES and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District requirements in regards to water quality treatment and best management practices for stormwater runoff related to construction activities. Funding The project is intended to be funded from State Aid funds, special assessments, and City utility funds. The estimated project costs* are as follows: * The estimated project costs include a 5% contingency and 10% indirect cost. The project is proposed to be assessed to the adjacent benefiting properties per the City's Assessment Practice. Lake Lucy Road is a collector roadway. As such, the assessable street rehabilitation costs have been prorated to reflect a standard residential street width of 31 feet. The assessable costs have also been prorated to reflect the assessable front footage of the benefiting properties along Lake Lucy Road through the project area. The front footage of benefiting properties is 48%. The assessment cost summary including the preliminary assessment amount is as follows: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectResolution 2020XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Public Hearing OrderImprovements and Authorize Preparation of Plans and SpecificationsSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.2.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202003PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council orders improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for the Lake Lucy RoadRehabilitation Project No. 2003.”Approval requires a 4/5 Vote.BACKGROUNDOn November 7, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On November 22, 2019, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Lake Lucy Road project.On December 9, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with WSB & Associates and authorizedpreparation of a feasibility study for the project.On January 28, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project with thepublic. Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project.On April 13, 2020, the City Council accepted the feasibility report and ordered the Public Hearing.DISCUSSIONLake Lucy Road is a collector street located on the east side of Lake Minnewashta between State Highway 41(Hazeltine Boulevard) and County Road 117 (Galpin Boulevard) and is in need of roadway pavementrehabilitation. The city's fiveyear Capital Improvement Plan has planned for the rehabilitation of Lake Lucy Road in2020. Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits asshown in Figure 1. The project includes a 0.66mile long urbanized street corridor. The existing road section wasoriginally constructed between 1994 and 1998.Figure 1: Project Area MapLake Lucy Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route. The city will utilize State Aid funding andspecial assessments to finance the street improvements. City utility funds will be used for funding any of the necessaryutility improvements.The average pavement overall condition index (OCI) is 63, which is within the range where overlays should beconsidered. The western half of the section is a few years older and the associated OCI is lower than the easternhalf. A Request for Proposals (RFP) for a geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributedby the Engineering department. American Engineering Testing, Inc. was hired to perform the work and prepare ageotechnical report for the project area. The report confirmed there is a pavement performance change about 350feet east of Brendan Court. This confirms the different OCI ratings through the project area. The report attributes thediffering pavement distresses observed between the western and eastern sections due to weaker supporting soils in thewestern half.The feasibility study in conjunction with the geotechnical report evaluated several different alternatives for pavementrehabilitation and recommended an alternativetype of a mill and overlay. A standard 2.5inch mill and overlay isrecommended to be combined with a seal coat between the milled surface and new bituminous layer. Thisrehabilitation combination technique is known as a 'Texas Underseal.' The additional seal coat layer is intended todelay reflective cracking between the existing base layer and the new overlay. Two or three additional years of servicelife are expected to be gained by adding this technique to a standard mill and overlay. The weaker support soils in thewestern half will not be able to be fully corrected until a reconstruction project is performed. The 'Texas Underseal' iseffectively intended to buy additional time for the service life of the pavement section. The trail along the corridor isintended to be rehabilitated via a full depth reclamation.Some spot repair of curb and gutter and other public utilities are also part of the project. All pedestrian ramps will bebrought into ADA compliance in accordance with the ADA transition plan.A capacity analysis of the storm sewer system was performed to verify it was adequately designed to serve the area. The analysis verified the existing system meets current design standards and the updated NOAA Atlas14 rainfallmodel standard. A spread and run analysis was also performed for each catch basin to identify any ponding concernson the roadway. The analysis identified three catch basin locations where an additional catch basin should be added toreduce temporary ponding during an intense rainfall event.Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer is not necessary. The valves on the watermain are planned to berehabilitated by changing out the bolting on the valves. The age of the original installation indicates the bolting is likelyto be mild steel. The bolts will be replaced with stainless steel to protect them long term from the corrosive soils foundin Chanhassen. Minor repairs primarily related to reducing infiltration and inflow are recommended for the sanitarysewer system.An open house informational meeting for public involvement was held on January 28, 2020. As appropriate,comments received were factored into the preliminary design and are included in the feasibility report. Speeding alongthe corridor was the primary common concern. Staff commissioned a speed study to be performed along the corridorto analyze the concern. The study was conducted over a sevenday period in February. The actual speed was notdisplayed on the sign apparatus to the traveling public during the study in order to record typical traveled speeds alongthe corridor without inducing a natural slowing at the device. From an engineering perspective, the 85th percentile isused to determine if there is a speeding concern. The 85th percentile speed was at the 30mph speed limit with anaverage pace between 23 mph and 33 mph.The proposed improvements will also address current NPDES and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed Districtrequirements in regards to water quality treatment and best management practices for stormwater runoff related toconstruction activities.FundingThe project is intended to be funded from State Aid funds, special assessments, and City utility funds. The estimated project costs* are as follows:* The estimated project costs include a 5% contingency and 10% indirect cost.The project is proposed to be assessed to the adjacent benefiting properties per the City's Assessment Practice. LakeLucy Road is a collector roadway. As such, the assessable street rehabilitation costs have been prorated to reflect astandard residential street width of 31 feet. The assessable costs have also been prorated to reflect the assessablefront footage of the benefiting properties along Lake Lucy Road through the project area. The front footage ofbenefiting properties is 48%. The assessment cost summary including the preliminary assessment amount is as follows: Schedule RECOMMENDATION From an engineering and financing perspective this project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective. Staff recommends the City Council orders improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for the Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 2003. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectResolution 2020XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Public Hearing OrderImprovements and Authorize Preparation of Plans and SpecificationsSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.2.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202003PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council orders improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for the Lake Lucy RoadRehabilitation Project No. 2003.”Approval requires a 4/5 Vote.BACKGROUNDOn November 7, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On November 22, 2019, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Lake Lucy Road project.On December 9, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with WSB & Associates and authorizedpreparation of a feasibility study for the project.On January 28, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project with thepublic. Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project.On April 13, 2020, the City Council accepted the feasibility report and ordered the Public Hearing.DISCUSSIONLake Lucy Road is a collector street located on the east side of Lake Minnewashta between State Highway 41(Hazeltine Boulevard) and County Road 117 (Galpin Boulevard) and is in need of roadway pavementrehabilitation. The city's fiveyear Capital Improvement Plan has planned for the rehabilitation of Lake Lucy Road in2020. Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits asshown in Figure 1. The project includes a 0.66mile long urbanized street corridor. The existing road section wasoriginally constructed between 1994 and 1998.Figure 1: Project Area MapLake Lucy Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route. The city will utilize State Aid funding andspecial assessments to finance the street improvements. City utility funds will be used for funding any of the necessaryutility improvements.The average pavement overall condition index (OCI) is 63, which is within the range where overlays should beconsidered. The western half of the section is a few years older and the associated OCI is lower than the easternhalf. A Request for Proposals (RFP) for a geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributedby the Engineering department. American Engineering Testing, Inc. was hired to perform the work and prepare ageotechnical report for the project area. The report confirmed there is a pavement performance change about 350feet east of Brendan Court. This confirms the different OCI ratings through the project area. The report attributes thediffering pavement distresses observed between the western and eastern sections due to weaker supporting soils in thewestern half.The feasibility study in conjunction with the geotechnical report evaluated several different alternatives for pavementrehabilitation and recommended an alternativetype of a mill and overlay. A standard 2.5inch mill and overlay isrecommended to be combined with a seal coat between the milled surface and new bituminous layer. Thisrehabilitation combination technique is known as a 'Texas Underseal.' The additional seal coat layer is intended todelay reflective cracking between the existing base layer and the new overlay. Two or three additional years of servicelife are expected to be gained by adding this technique to a standard mill and overlay. The weaker support soils in thewestern half will not be able to be fully corrected until a reconstruction project is performed. The 'Texas Underseal' iseffectively intended to buy additional time for the service life of the pavement section. The trail along the corridor isintended to be rehabilitated via a full depth reclamation.Some spot repair of curb and gutter and other public utilities are also part of the project. All pedestrian ramps will bebrought into ADA compliance in accordance with the ADA transition plan.A capacity analysis of the storm sewer system was performed to verify it was adequately designed to serve the area. The analysis verified the existing system meets current design standards and the updated NOAA Atlas14 rainfallmodel standard. A spread and run analysis was also performed for each catch basin to identify any ponding concernson the roadway. The analysis identified three catch basin locations where an additional catch basin should be added toreduce temporary ponding during an intense rainfall event.Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer is not necessary. The valves on the watermain are planned to berehabilitated by changing out the bolting on the valves. The age of the original installation indicates the bolting is likelyto be mild steel. The bolts will be replaced with stainless steel to protect them long term from the corrosive soils foundin Chanhassen. Minor repairs primarily related to reducing infiltration and inflow are recommended for the sanitarysewer system.An open house informational meeting for public involvement was held on January 28, 2020. As appropriate,comments received were factored into the preliminary design and are included in the feasibility report. Speeding alongthe corridor was the primary common concern. Staff commissioned a speed study to be performed along the corridorto analyze the concern. The study was conducted over a sevenday period in February. The actual speed was notdisplayed on the sign apparatus to the traveling public during the study in order to record typical traveled speeds alongthe corridor without inducing a natural slowing at the device. From an engineering perspective, the 85th percentile isused to determine if there is a speeding concern. The 85th percentile speed was at the 30mph speed limit with anaverage pace between 23 mph and 33 mph.The proposed improvements will also address current NPDES and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed Districtrequirements in regards to water quality treatment and best management practices for stormwater runoff related toconstruction activities.FundingThe project is intended to be funded from State Aid funds, special assessments, and City utility funds. The estimated project costs* are as follows:* The estimated project costs include a 5% contingency and 10% indirect cost.The project is proposed to be assessed to the adjacent benefiting properties per the City's Assessment Practice. LakeLucy Road is a collector roadway. As such, the assessable street rehabilitation costs have been prorated to reflect astandard residential street width of 31 feet. The assessable costs have also been prorated to reflect the assessablefront footage of the benefiting properties along Lake Lucy Road through the project area. The front footage ofbenefiting properties is 48%.The assessment cost summary including the preliminary assessment amount is as follows:ScheduleRECOMMENDATIONFrom an engineering and financing perspective this project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective. Staff recommends the City Council orders improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for the Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 2003. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Preliminary Assessment Roll and Map 2020 CIP Sheet CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: April 27, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS & AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LAKE LUCY ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 20-03 WHEREAS, on April 13, 2020, the City Council received the feasibility repo rt and called for the public hearing to be held on April 27, 2020 for the Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20- 03; and WHEREAS, ten days’ mailed notice and two weeks’ published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon the 27th day of April, 2020 which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution adopted April 27, 2020. 3. Authorizes preparation of plans and specifications for the Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20-03. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 27th day of April, 2020. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT City ProjectLake Lucy Road Rehabilitation ProjectStreet Improvement Cost (Less 10% Indirect Costs)421,000.00$ Project No.20-03Assessable Cost @ 40%168,400.00$ Assessable Front Footage (48.15%)81,100.00$ Prorated for 31' Residential (86.11%)69,800.00$ Single Family Residential Units20Date:4/7/2020Single Family Unit Assessment Rate3,490.00$ MAP ID PARCEL ID PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER NAMEOWNER ADDRESSSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNIT EQUIVALENTSUNIT ASSESSMENT RATE ASSESSMENT AMOUNT1 251460020 2323 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 CHANHASSEN CITY PO BOX 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 2 251470070 2275 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 CLEONE B FOSTER 2275 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 3 251470080 2249 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 MARY ANN OLSON TRUST AGREEMENT 2249 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 4 258420010 2237 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 ZHIJUN WANG 2237 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 5 258420020 2219 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 KENNETH F & KRISTEN L THATCHER 2219 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 6 258420030 2201 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 STEPHEN J & LAURIE A KERKVLIET 2201 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 7 258420040 2181 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 BRUCE S SMITH 414 MAIN ST APT #1 Northport, NY 11768 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 8 258420050 2165 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 MATTHEW KRAMER 2165 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 9 258420060 2151 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 BENJAMIN F SNYDER 2151 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 10 258420070 2135 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 IH2 PROPERTY ILLINOIS LP 1717 MAIN ST SUITE 2000 Dallas, TX 75201 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 11 258420080 2117 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 KELLY P DAVIES 2117 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 12 258420100 2122 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 KAREN M RYAN 2122 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 13 258420090 2144 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 DREHER FAMILY WEALTH TRUST 2144 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 14 251470060 2244 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 GINA B SAUER REV TRUST 2244 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 15 251450030 2340 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 BARBARA A MILLER TRUST 2340 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 16 251450020 2360 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUSANNE SCHAER 2360 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 17 251450010 2380 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 KATHY A FIELD TRUST 2380 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 18 253490030 2432 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 BRUCE B & HOLLY H OLSON 2432 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 19 253490020 2444 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 ADAM G LUKENS 2444 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 20 253490010 2450 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 MOUNT OLIVET ROLLING ACRES INC 18986 LAKE DR E Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$ Lake Lucy RoadPreliminary Assessment Roll ?ÌA@ 2 3 19 1 18 4 20 97658 17 1516 11 12 14 13 10Lake Lucy RdGalpin BlvdHazeltine BlvdManchester RdLake Harrison RdHighover DrPinehurst Dr Crestview Dr Br e n d e n Ct Topaz Dr Highover Tr H e m lo c k L a Ruby LaC r e s t v i e w C i r Highgate Cir Briarwood CtAmberwood LaM-588 Alder Way Edgewood Ct 1 inch = 400 f eet Document Path: K:\015301-000\GIS\Maps\Figure10_AssessmentMap.mxd Date Saved: 4/6/2020 8:15:22 AMLake Lucy Road Rehabilitation ProjectChanhassen, MN Pro ject LocationAssessed ParcelsCity Own ed Parcels Figure 10 - Preliminary Assessment Map 0 400Feet¯ Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley 2020 2024thru Department Street Improvements Description Annual project to rehabilitate and reconstruct streets in the City. The following streets are scheduled to be completed in 2020, future areas will be determined by available funds and condition of the streets. 2020 Minnewashta Parkway (MSA, 2020 & 2021) and Lake Lucy-TH41 to Galpin Blvd (MSA) Krvers Point, Willow View, Twin Maple and Basswood Stone Creek Drive, Boulder Road, Stone Creek Ct, Stone Creek Ln, etc. Hidden Lane, Hidden Circle, Hidden Court, Marsh Drive, Sinnen Circle and Dakota Lane Lake Lucy, Nez Perce, Vineland Court and Troendle Circle Brendan Court Project #ST-012 Priority n/a Justification The City uses a Pavement Management System to monitor the condition of the City streets. While proper preventative maintenance extends the life of the street and is cost effective, a street will eventually deteriorate to a point that major maintenance is required. Rehabilitation projects extend the life of the street. In cases when utilities or poor sub grade needs to be replaced or where streets have deteriorated to a point where rehabilitation will no longer be practical, reconstruction of the street is necessary. A feasibility study is written to consider the merits of the project and scope of work. Budget Impact/Other This project may decrease maintenance costs. Useful Life Unassigned Project Name Annual Street Improvement Program Category Streets/Highways Type Improvement Account #2 Account #1 601-xxxx-4751 Total Project Cost:$56,694,000 Account #4 Account #3 Total20202021202220232024Expenditures 30,664,0006,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000Construction 6,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000 30,664,000Total Prior 26,030,000 Total Total20202021202220232024FundingSources 17,620,0002,582,500 3,637,500 3,700,000 3,800,000 3,900,000Assessment/Revolving Assess Fund 3,333,0001,716,500 1,516,500 100,000MSA 1,685,000192,500 517,500 325,000 325,000 325,000SewerUtilityFund 2,771,000185,500 785,500 600,000 600,000 600,000SurfaceWaterUtilityFund 5,255,0001,550,000 1,605,000 700,000 700,000 700,000WaterUtilityFund 6,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000 30,664,000Total Prior 26,030,000 Total 89 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 27, 2020 Subject Resolution 2020XX: 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 2005: Order Improvements and Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.3. Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202005 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council orders improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 2005.” Approval requires a 4/5 Vote. BACKGROUND On November 27, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) for consultant services for the project. On December 20, 2019, the Engineering Department received two proposals from consultants for consultant services. On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a contract with KimleyHorn & Associates and authorized preparation of a feasibility study. On February 11, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project with the public. Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project. On April 13, 2020, the City Council accepted the feasibility report for the project and called for a public hearing to be held on April 27, 2020. DISCUSSION The scope of the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project consists of six neighborhood areas (reference attached 2020 Local Pavement Rehabilitation map). All of these roads have deteriorated over the years and are in need of rehabilitation. The City's 5year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) finalized last November identified these roads would be completed in 2020 as mill and overlay projects. Staff utilized the City's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits as shown in Figures 17 (reference attachment). The total project roadway length is approximately 6.2 miles. The Lake Lucy Road area lies east of CR 17 (Powers Blvd.) with approximately 0.7 miles of roads builtout CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectResolution 2020XX: 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 2005: OrderImprovements and Authorize Preparation of Plans and SpecificationsSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.3.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202005PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council orders improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for the 2020 City PavementRehabilitation Project No. 2005.”Approval requires a 4/5 Vote.BACKGROUNDOn November 27, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On December 20, 2019, the Engineering Department received two proposals from consultants for consultant services.On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a contract with KimleyHorn & Associates and authorizedpreparation of a feasibility study.On February 11, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project withthe public. Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project.On April 13, 2020, the City Council accepted the feasibility report for the project and called for a public hearing to beheld on April 27, 2020.DISCUSSIONThe scope of the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project consists of six neighborhood areas (reference attached2020 Local Pavement Rehabilitation map). All of these roads have deteriorated over the years and are in need ofrehabilitation. The City's 5year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) finalized last November identified these roads wouldbe completed in 2020 as mill and overlay projects.Staff utilized the City's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits as shownin Figures 17 (reference attachment). The total project roadway length is approximately 6.2 miles. The Lake Lucy Road area lies east of CR 17 (Powers Blvd.) with approximately 0.7 miles of roads builtout between 1988 and 1992. The Redwing Lane area lies east of Powers Blvd. as well, with approximately 0.5 miles of roads builtout in 1980 The Trappers Pass areas lie north of Pleasant View Road and west of TH 101, with approximately 3.0 miles of roads builtout between 1985 and 1994. This area includes the Near Mountain, Trappers Pass, and Summit developments inclusive of all of the additions. The Choctaw Circle area lies west of TH 101 with approximately 0.4 miles of roads builtout in 1978. The Kurvers Point Road area lies west of TH 101, with approximately 0.6 miles of road builtout between 1991 and 1992. The Marsh Drive area lies north of Rice Marsh Lake and south of TH 5 with approximately 1.0 miles of roads builtout in 1986. None of these roads were originally built to current city standards. None of these roads have had major rehabilitation performed since the original construction (only maintenance activities such as crack sealing, patching, and seal coats have been performed). An RFP for geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributed by the Engineering department for the Trappers Pass, Marsh Drive, Redwing Lane, and Lake Lucy Road areas. American Engineering Testing, Inc. was hired to perform the work and prepare the geotechnical report for these project areas. The city had previously issued an RFP and had a geotechnical report prepared for the Kurvers Point and Choctaw Circle areas. This report was prepared by Braun Intertec in the Fall of 2018. The city conducts these geotechnical assessments and pavement evaluations to aid in the analysis of proper roadway pavement rehabilitation designs. The design consultant was provided the geotechnical reports for the purposed of informing their design. Based on the geotechnical reports and the feasibility study, four of the six areas should be rehabilitated by a full depth reclamation (FDR) technique. This is primarily based on the existing OCI, existing pavement thicknesses and condition, and the supporting soils. The other two areas (Choctaw Circle and Redwing Lane) are recommended to be rehabilitated via a mill and overlay. The feasibility report accepted at the April 13, 2020 City Council meeting identified that the cost difference between the recommended rehabilitation techniques (FDR vs mill and overlay) created a shortfall compared to the available budget, and therefore identified three of the six areas could be advanced within the available budget (Trapper's Pass, Choctaw Circle, and Redwing Lane) Subsequent to the April 13, 2020 City Council meeting, internal discussions with Administration and Finance concluded that there may be some other funding sources available to complete all six of the programmed areas in lieu of just three. It is staff's recommendation that all six areas be completed in 2020 so the City can stay on schedule for the overall overall Capitol Pavement Management Plan. The majority of the roadways within the project areas do not have an existing trail or sidewalk. All pedestrian ramps are typically brought into compliance in accordance with the ADA transition plan. In the case of this project, the existing pedestrian ramps in the project areas have already been brought into compliance. Hence, no pedestrian ramps are included as part of the project. As with most road rehabilitation projects, minor spot repair of curb and gutter and public utilities are planned. City staff performed a condition assessment on the existing storm sewer structures to evaluate the need for improvements. All identified needs will be incorporated into the project. The design consultant evaluated each neighborhood area for potential flooding during a 100year event at all emergency overflows (EOF) for roadway low points and stormwater ponds. The results for each area are summarized in the feasibility study and any identified concerns will be addressed in the final design. A number of comments from the open house hosted on February 11, 2020, were also related to drainage concerns. As appropriate, these concerns will also be addressed in the final design. Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer are not necessary. The valves on the watermain are planned to be rehabilitated by changing out the bolting on the valves. Minor repairs primarily related to reducing infiltration and inflow CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectResolution 2020XX: 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 2005: OrderImprovements and Authorize Preparation of Plans and SpecificationsSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.3.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202005PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council orders improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for the 2020 City PavementRehabilitation Project No. 2005.”Approval requires a 4/5 Vote.BACKGROUNDOn November 27, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On December 20, 2019, the Engineering Department received two proposals from consultants for consultant services.On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a contract with KimleyHorn & Associates and authorizedpreparation of a feasibility study.On February 11, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project withthe public. Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project.On April 13, 2020, the City Council accepted the feasibility report for the project and called for a public hearing to beheld on April 27, 2020.DISCUSSIONThe scope of the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project consists of six neighborhood areas (reference attached2020 Local Pavement Rehabilitation map). All of these roads have deteriorated over the years and are in need ofrehabilitation. The City's 5year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) finalized last November identified these roads wouldbe completed in 2020 as mill and overlay projects.Staff utilized the City's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits as shownin Figures 17 (reference attachment). The total project roadway length is approximately 6.2 miles.The Lake Lucy Road area lies east of CR 17 (Powers Blvd.) with approximately 0.7 miles of roads builtoutbetween 1988 and 1992.The Redwing Lane area lies east of Powers Blvd. as well, with approximately 0.5 miles of roads builtout in1980The Trappers Pass areas lie north of Pleasant View Road and west of TH 101, with approximately 3.0 miles ofroads builtout between 1985 and 1994. This area includes the Near Mountain, Trappers Pass, and Summitdevelopments inclusive of all of the additions.The Choctaw Circle area lies west of TH 101 with approximately 0.4 miles of roads builtout in 1978.The Kurvers Point Road area lies west of TH 101, with approximately 0.6 miles of road builtout between1991 and 1992.The Marsh Drive area lies north of Rice Marsh Lake and south of TH 5 with approximately 1.0 miles of roadsbuiltout in 1986.None of these roads were originally built to current city standards. None of these roads have had major rehabilitationperformed since the original construction (only maintenance activities such as crack sealing, patching, and seal coatshave been performed).An RFP for geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributed by the Engineeringdepartment for the Trappers Pass, Marsh Drive, Redwing Lane, and Lake Lucy Road areas. American EngineeringTesting, Inc. was hired to perform the work and prepare the geotechnical report for these project areas. The city hadpreviously issued an RFP and had a geotechnical report prepared for the Kurvers Point and Choctaw Circle areas. Thisreport was prepared by Braun Intertec in the Fall of 2018. The city conducts these geotechnical assessments andpavement evaluations to aid in the analysis of proper roadway pavement rehabilitation designs.The design consultant was provided the geotechnical reports for the purposed of informing their design. Based on thegeotechnical reports and the feasibility study, four of the six areas should be rehabilitated by a full depth reclamation(FDR) technique. This is primarily based on the existing OCI, existing pavement thicknesses and condition, and thesupporting soils. The other two areas (Choctaw Circle and Redwing Lane) are recommended to be rehabilitated via amill and overlay.The feasibility report accepted at the April 13, 2020 City Council meeting identified that the cost difference between therecommended rehabilitation techniques (FDR vs mill and overlay) created a shortfall compared to the available budget,and therefore identified three of the six areas could be advanced within the available budget (Trapper's Pass, ChoctawCircle, and Redwing Lane)Subsequent to the April 13, 2020 City Council meeting, internal discussions with Administration and Finance concludedthat there may be some other funding sources available to complete all six of the programmed areas in lieu of just three. It is staff's recommendation that all six areas be completed in 2020 so the City can stay on schedule for the overalloverall Capitol Pavement Management Plan. The majority of the roadways within the project areas do not have an existing trail or sidewalk. All pedestrian rampsare typically brought into compliance in accordance with the ADA transition plan. In the case of this project, theexisting pedestrian ramps in the project areas have already been brought into compliance. Hence, no pedestrianramps are included as part of the project. As with most road rehabilitation projects, minor spot repair of curb andgutter and public utilities are planned. City staff performed a condition assessment on the existing storm sewer structures to evaluate the need forimprovements. All identified needs will be incorporated into the project. The design consultant evaluated eachneighborhood area for potential flooding during a 100year event at all emergency overflows (EOF) for roadway lowpoints and stormwater ponds. The results for each area are summarized in the feasibility study and any identifiedconcerns will be addressed in the final design. A number of comments from the open house hosted on February 11,2020, were also related to drainage concerns. As appropriate, these concerns will also be addressed in the finaldesign. Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer are not necessary. The valves on the watermain are planned to be rehabilitated by changing out the bolting on the valves. Minor repairs primarily related to reducing infiltration and inflow are recommended for the sanitary sewer system. The project will address current NPDES, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District permitting requirements as applicable. Due to there being no new or reconstructed impervious surfaces, there are not any triggers for permanent stormwater management rules in either watershed district. The feasibility report also addressed a section of watermain that routes through backyard easements between Lake Lucy Road and Western Drive. This section connects the watermains in the public rightofway. The final design can further investigate if this section of watermain can costeffectively be eliminated to alleviate maintenance access issues in the future. Currently, the work is not included as part of the feasibility analysis or costs. Funding Funding for the project is proposed to come from the pavement management fund and special assessments to benefiting properties for the street improvement costs and city utility funds as required. Two spreadsheets showing the impacts of this project to the revolving special assessment fund balance are attached, one showing current year assessments which is typical, and a second showing a oneyear deferred assessment. The total project costs are shown below, although the assessments are only based on the roadway improvements portion shown in the feasibility report. Per the city’s assessment practice, 40% of the roadway costs are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners. The preliminary special assessments for the six areas identified are as follows: Lake Lucy Road area: $3,068 Kurvers Point Road area: $4,340 Marsh Drive area: $2,336 Redwing Lane area: $1,960 Choctaw Circle area: $2,160 Trappers Pass area: $3,048 The Redwing Lane and Choctaw Circle areas will be rehabilitated by a standard mill and overlay technique. The Trappers Pass, Lake Lucy Road, Kurvers Point and Marsh Drive areas will be rehabilitated by a full depth reclamation. The main difference in the assessment cost is related to that difference. Schedule CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 27, 2020SubjectResolution 2020XX: 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 2005: OrderImprovements and Authorize Preparation of Plans and SpecificationsSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: F.3.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202005PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council orders improvements and preparation of plans and specifications for the 2020 City PavementRehabilitation Project No. 2005.”Approval requires a 4/5 Vote.BACKGROUNDOn November 27, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On December 20, 2019, the Engineering Department received two proposals from consultants for consultant services.On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a contract with KimleyHorn & Associates and authorizedpreparation of a feasibility study.On February 11, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project withthe public. Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project.On April 13, 2020, the City Council accepted the feasibility report for the project and called for a public hearing to beheld on April 27, 2020.DISCUSSIONThe scope of the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project consists of six neighborhood areas (reference attached2020 Local Pavement Rehabilitation map). All of these roads have deteriorated over the years and are in need ofrehabilitation. The City's 5year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) finalized last November identified these roads wouldbe completed in 2020 as mill and overlay projects.Staff utilized the City's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits as shownin Figures 17 (reference attachment). The total project roadway length is approximately 6.2 miles.The Lake Lucy Road area lies east of CR 17 (Powers Blvd.) with approximately 0.7 miles of roads builtoutbetween 1988 and 1992.The Redwing Lane area lies east of Powers Blvd. as well, with approximately 0.5 miles of roads builtout in1980The Trappers Pass areas lie north of Pleasant View Road and west of TH 101, with approximately 3.0 miles ofroads builtout between 1985 and 1994. This area includes the Near Mountain, Trappers Pass, and Summitdevelopments inclusive of all of the additions.The Choctaw Circle area lies west of TH 101 with approximately 0.4 miles of roads builtout in 1978.The Kurvers Point Road area lies west of TH 101, with approximately 0.6 miles of road builtout between1991 and 1992.The Marsh Drive area lies north of Rice Marsh Lake and south of TH 5 with approximately 1.0 miles of roadsbuiltout in 1986.None of these roads were originally built to current city standards. None of these roads have had major rehabilitationperformed since the original construction (only maintenance activities such as crack sealing, patching, and seal coatshave been performed).An RFP for geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributed by the Engineeringdepartment for the Trappers Pass, Marsh Drive, Redwing Lane, and Lake Lucy Road areas. American EngineeringTesting, Inc. was hired to perform the work and prepare the geotechnical report for these project areas. The city hadpreviously issued an RFP and had a geotechnical report prepared for the Kurvers Point and Choctaw Circle areas. Thisreport was prepared by Braun Intertec in the Fall of 2018. The city conducts these geotechnical assessments andpavement evaluations to aid in the analysis of proper roadway pavement rehabilitation designs.The design consultant was provided the geotechnical reports for the purposed of informing their design. Based on thegeotechnical reports and the feasibility study, four of the six areas should be rehabilitated by a full depth reclamation(FDR) technique. This is primarily based on the existing OCI, existing pavement thicknesses and condition, and thesupporting soils. The other two areas (Choctaw Circle and Redwing Lane) are recommended to be rehabilitated via amill and overlay.The feasibility report accepted at the April 13, 2020 City Council meeting identified that the cost difference between therecommended rehabilitation techniques (FDR vs mill and overlay) created a shortfall compared to the available budget,and therefore identified three of the six areas could be advanced within the available budget (Trapper's Pass, ChoctawCircle, and Redwing Lane)Subsequent to the April 13, 2020 City Council meeting, internal discussions with Administration and Finance concludedthat there may be some other funding sources available to complete all six of the programmed areas in lieu of just three. It is staff's recommendation that all six areas be completed in 2020 so the City can stay on schedule for the overalloverall Capitol Pavement Management Plan. The majority of the roadways within the project areas do not have an existing trail or sidewalk. All pedestrian rampsare typically brought into compliance in accordance with the ADA transition plan. In the case of this project, theexisting pedestrian ramps in the project areas have already been brought into compliance. Hence, no pedestrianramps are included as part of the project. As with most road rehabilitation projects, minor spot repair of curb andgutter and public utilities are planned. City staff performed a condition assessment on the existing storm sewer structures to evaluate the need forimprovements. All identified needs will be incorporated into the project. The design consultant evaluated eachneighborhood area for potential flooding during a 100year event at all emergency overflows (EOF) for roadway lowpoints and stormwater ponds. The results for each area are summarized in the feasibility study and any identifiedconcerns will be addressed in the final design. A number of comments from the open house hosted on February 11,2020, were also related to drainage concerns. As appropriate, these concerns will also be addressed in the finaldesign.Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer are not necessary. The valves on the watermain are planned to berehabilitated by changing out the bolting on the valves. Minor repairs primarily related to reducing infiltration and infloware recommended for the sanitary sewer system.The project will address current NPDES, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and Riley Purgatory Bluff CreekWatershed District permitting requirements as applicable. Due to there being no new or reconstructed impervioussurfaces, there are not any triggers for permanent stormwater management rules in either watershed district.The feasibility report also addressed a section of watermain that routes through backyard easements between Lake LucyRoad and Western Drive. This section connects the watermains in the public rightofway. The final design can furtherinvestigate if this section of watermain can costeffectively be eliminated to alleviate maintenance access issues in thefuture. Currently, the work is not included as part of the feasibility analysis or costs.FundingFunding for the project is proposed to come from the pavement management fund and special assessments tobenefiting properties for the street improvement costs and city utility funds as required. Two spreadsheets showing theimpacts of this project to the revolving special assessment fund balance are attached, one showing current yearassessments which is typical, and a second showing a oneyear deferred assessment.The total project costs are shown below, although the assessments are only based on the roadway improvementsportion shown in the feasibility report. Per the city’s assessment practice, 40% of the roadway costs are proposed tobe assessed to the benefiting property owners.The preliminary special assessments for the six areas identified are as follows:Lake Lucy Road area: $3,068Kurvers Point Road area: $4,340Marsh Drive area: $2,336Redwing Lane area: $1,960Choctaw Circle area: $2,160Trappers Pass area: $3,048The Redwing Lane and Choctaw Circle areas will be rehabilitated by a standard mill and overlay technique. TheTrappers Pass, Lake Lucy Road, Kurvers Point and Marsh Drive areas will be rehabilitated by a full depthreclamation. The main difference in the assessment cost is related to that difference. Schedule RECOMMENDATION From an engineering perspective this project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective. Staff recommends the City Council orders the improvements and authorizes preparation of plans and specifications for all six (6) of the 2020 Pavement Rehabilitation areas programmed subject to the use of alternate bidding packaging and contract award scenarios. ATTACHMENTS: 2020 Rehabilitation Map Figures 17 Resolution Preliminary Assessment Rolls and Maps 2020 CIP Sheet Feasibility Report Assessment Fund Spreadsheet Potential Assessment Strategies "F)³CH ±Lake Lucy LakeAnn Lotus Lake Lake Susan NorthLotusLakePark CarverBeachPark Lake SusanPark LakeAnnPark MeadowGreenPark SouthLotusLakePark PleasantViewPreserve K eber P ondChristmasLake ?©A@?©A@ ?ûA@ ?ûA@ GïWX GqWX GqWX GqWX Date Created: 12/17/2019 Document Path: K:\WSB\Maps\Engineering\StreetCIP_2019\LocalPavementRehabProject_2020.mxd Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department³CH ±City Hall "F)Fire Station 2020 - Mill & Overlay Railroad Rivers Lakes Parks Parcel Boundaries City of Chanhassen 2020 Local Pavement Rehabilitation Project (20-05) µ0 1,600Feet 0 0.25Mile 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Maps (Figures 1-7) Figure 1: Lake Lucy Road Area Map Figure 2: Choctaw Circle Area Map Figure 3: Kurvers Point Road Area Map Figure 4: Marsh Drive Area Map Figure 5: Redwing Lane Area Map Figure 6: Trappers Pass (West) Area Map Figure 7: Trappers Pass (East) Area Map CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: April 27, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS & AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 20-05 WHEREAS, on April 13, 2020, the City Council received the feasibility report and called for the public hearing to be held on April 27, 2020 for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20-05; and WHEREAS, ten days’ mailed notice and two weeks’ published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon the 27th day of April, 2020 which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution adopted April 27, 2020. 3. Authorizes preparation of plans and specifications for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20-05. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 27th day of April, 2020. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 243,000.00$ 5,400.00$ per REU PARCEL # PID # PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO. STREET REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 153 250012000 / 254200451 SINGLE-FAMILY SCOTT & JANET WOLTER 6850 CHANHASSEN RD 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 154 254200450 / 254200010 SINGLE-FAMILY RICK & ROBERTA MURRAY 15 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 155 254200020 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID DEAN GUGGEMOS 31 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 156 254200030 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & JESSICA ABRAMS 51 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 157 254200040 SINGLE-FAMILY ELIZABETH & JEFFREY WELTER 71 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 158 254200050 SINGLE-FAMILY ALAN & BRENDA LEM 91 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 159 254200060 SINGLE-FAMILY GARY WELCH 101 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 160 254200070 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & LENORE DRYKE 105 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 161 254200080 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & BARBARA HECTORNE 111 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 162 254200090 SINGLE-FAMILY CHARLES & PAULA HALLAU 115 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 163 254200440 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & STACEY HORVICK 121 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 164 254200430 SINGLE-FAMILY KENTON & SHARON TOLLBERG 125 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 165 254200420 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSHUA & JENNIFER REITAN 131 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 166 254200410 SINGLE-FAMILY ALLISTER TUDOR & DENISE JONES 135 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 167 254200400 SINGLE-FAMILY HARVEY & CATHERINE GREEN 141 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 168 254200390 SINGLE-FAMILY ANDREW BALAZS & KRISTEN FRAZER 145 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 169 254200380 SINGLE-FAMILY LAURA METTNER 151 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 170 254200370 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRIS & JANA CASTILLON 155 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 171 254200360 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH EDWARD ALEXANDER 161 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 172 254200350 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & JESSICA ENGLUND 160 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 173 254200340 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY & CAROL KAHNKE 154 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 174 254200330 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT HOFFNER & KAREN HUGHES-HOFFNER 150 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 175 254200320 SINGLE-FAMILY NEIL LIBSON & SUSAN DREVES 140 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 176 2545200310 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTIANE PEREIRA DOLABELLA DUARTE 130 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 177 2540200300 SINGLE-FAMILY REBECCA & MARC HEAGNEY 120 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 178 254200290 SINGLE-FAMILY LANCE & SUSAN STREFF 110 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 179 254200280 SINGLE-FAMILY JESSICA & JOSHUA FRIE 100 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 180 254200270 SINGLE-FAMILY WAYNE & CATHY DIONNE 90 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 181 254200260 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN & KIIRSTEN RAKERS 70 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 182 254200250 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS LAUBY & MARY BURKHARDT 50 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 183 254200240 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & AMBER BATTIN 30 CHOCTAW CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 184 254200230 SINGLE-FAMILY NICHOLAS & SANDRA GASSMAN 6800 BRULE CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 185 254200220 SINGLE-FAMILY JAIMIE LAVANGER 6790 BRULE CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 186 254200210 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & ANN RHODES 6780 BRULE CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 187 254200200 SINGLE-FAMILY COLLEEN & STEPHEN FRANKWITZ 6770 BRULE CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 188 254200190 SINGLE-FAMILY PATRICK NOLAN & CARLA HANSON-NOLAN 6760 BRULE CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 189 254200180 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & CHARLENE BOROTZ 6750 BRULE CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 190 254200170 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER BORNS 6751 BRULE CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 191 254200160 SINGLE-FAMILY LEAH THOMAS & CHRISTINE SMITH 6761 BRULE CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 192 254200150 SINGLE-FAMILY CARL & MELISSA ECKER 6771 BRULE CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 193 254200140 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & JESSICA FRIBERG 6781 BRULE CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 194 254200130 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & GLENDA SPEECE 6791 BRULE CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 195 254200120 SINGLE-FAMILY CHARLES SIMON & ANGELA SCHLENDER 6801 BRULE CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 196 254200110 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & STACY MCNABB 6805 BRULE CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 197 254200100 SINGLE-FAMILY CYNTHIA WALSTON 6811 BRULE CIR 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 45 TOTAL 97,200.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Roadway Assessment Assessment Totals Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA 434,000.00$ 10,850.00$ per REU PARCEL # PID # PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO. STREET REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT A 253920270 H.O.A. KURVERS POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 7221 KURVERS POINT RD 0 40% $ - -$ B 253920320 H.O.A. KURVERS POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION - KURVERS POINT RD 0 40% $ - -$ 113 253920260 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & LAURANNA GODFREY 7231 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 114 253920250 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES HENRICK 7241 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 115 253920240 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW JENSEN & JENNIFER TIBODEAU-JOHNSON 7251 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 116 253920230 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & LISA FARLAND 7261 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 117 253920220 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHLEEN GROVER 60 TWIN MAPLE LN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 118 253920210 SINGLE-FAMILY KARMIN & STEVEN CORKERY 40 TWIN MAPLE LN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 119 253920200 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON & JODI RADEL 20 TWIN MAPLE LN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 120 253920190 SINGLE-FAMILY TERENCE J MCGROTTY ETAL 21 TWIN MAPLE LN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 121 253920180 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD ANTON & DIANNE DEERING 41 TWIN MAPLE LN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 122 253920170 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & ELIZABETH HARRINGTON 51 TWIN MAPLE LN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 123 253920160 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON & CHRISTINE OSTBYE 71 TWIN MAPLE LN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 124 253920150 SINGLE-FAMILY CRAIG & SANDRA CARLSON 7271 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 125 253930140 SINGLE-FAMILY BRADLEY & KATHLEEN VELDBOOM 40 BASSWOOD CIR 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 126 253930130 SINGLE-FAMILY CAMERON & ERIN REINHART 30 BASSWOOD CIR 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 127 253930120 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY & JODIE SIEMS 20 BASSWOOD CIR 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 128 253930110 SINGLE-FAMILY TANYA GLATTLY 21 BASSWOOD CIR 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 129 253930100 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & DEBORAH WOLFF 31 BASSWOOD CIR 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 130 253930090 SINGLE-FAMILY FRANK & LISA MENDEZ 7361 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 131 253930080 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK ENGASSER 7371 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 132 253930070 SINGLE-FAMILY KURT & DEANA FOSSEY 7381 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 133 253930060 SINGLE-FAMILY SCOTT JOHNSON 7380 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 134 253930050 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & NANCY KOCH 7370 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 135 253930040 SINGLE-FAMILY SUSAN APPLEGATE 7360 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 136 253930030 SINGLE-FAMILY BRAIN & KRISTEN APPLEGATE 7350 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 137 253930020 SINGLE-FAMILY JAY ANTHONY WARMUTH 7340 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 138 253930010 SINGLE-FAMILY ALFRED & SUSAN HENDERSON 7330 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 139 253920010 SINGLE-FAMILY MOHAMMED NASHAWATY & HAZAR ALNAHASS 7320 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 140 253920020 SINGLE-FAMILY BROOKE & KJIRSTEN NYSTROM 7310 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 141 253920030 SINGLE-FAMILY DANNY & BRENDA VATLAND 7290 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 142 253920040 SINGLE-FAMILY COREY & AMY FRANKLIN 7280 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 143 253920050 SINGLE-FAMILY JACQUELINE KURVERS 7240 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 144 253920060 SINGLE-FAMILY FRANKLIN & MYRNA KURVERS 7220 KURVERS POINT RD 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 145 253920130 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON & DANIELLE HUTTNER 7131 WILLOW VIEW CV 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 146 253920140 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JODI OSTENDORF 7151 WILLOW VIEW CV 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 147 253920070 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN MESTITZ & PEGGY NAAS 7200 WILLOW VIEW CV 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 148 256950010 SINGLE-FAMILY ANDREW & JINNY SENN 7160 WILLOW VIEW CV 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 149 256950020 SINGLE-FAMILY CRAIG & LAURIE BURFEIND 7150 WILLOW VIEW CV 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 150 253920100 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & SOPHIE CHABIN 7130 WILLOW VIEW CV 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 151 253920110 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & SOPHIE CHABIN 7140 WILLOW VIEW CV 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 152 253920120 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & NARTHLADA FREEMAN 7120 WILLOW VIEW CV 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 40 TOTAL 173,600.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Roadway Assessment Assessment Totals Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA 422,000.00$ 7,670.00$ per REU PARCEL # PID # PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO. STREET REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 246 251600030 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ANNE MCGINN 1121 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 247 251620130 SINGLE-FAMILY LESTER & JUDY BOLSTAD 1101 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 248 251620140 SINGLE-FAMILY GEOFFREY & JULIA SEPER 1081 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 249 251620150 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & AMANDA DURRANT 1061 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 250 251620160 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & TERESA SCHREMPP 1041 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 251 251620170 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER UNGER 1021 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 252 251620180 SINGLE-FAMILY BRADLEY & KAROL JOHNSON 1001 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 253 251620190 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & KATHRYN MOZDREN 981 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 254 251620200 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & SUSAN DUCHENE 961 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 255 251620210 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & PAMELA O'CONNOR 941 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 256 251620220 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT KAHLMEYER 921 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 257 251620010 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON LOCHER 1100 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 258 251620020 SINGLE-FAMILY RANDALL & TRACY BENSON 1080 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 259 251620030 SINGLE-FAMILY LISA SLEZAK-MOSER 1060 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 260 251620040 SINGLE-FAMILY BRYCE FIER & MARY MARKUN-FIER 1040 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 261 251620050 SINGLE-FAMILY REBECCA HADRYS 1020 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 262 251620060 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & DENISE CLARKE 1000 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 263 251620070 SINGLE-FAMILY ANTONIO & AMY FRICANO 980 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 264 251620080 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & MONICA KOSVIC 960 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 265 251620090 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & PATTI MANNING 940 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 266 251620100 SINGLE-FAMILY JORGE GUANTER-GALTES & MIREIA MONLLOR TORMOS 920 LAKE LUCY RD 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 267 258710050 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & MARY LYNN PATTERSON 6580 NEZ PERCE DR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 268 258710040 SINGLE-FAMILY EDWARD & PAMELA CAPPELLE 6560 NEZ PERCE DR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 269 258710030 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL JOHNSON & GWEN WESTPHAL-JOHNSON 6540 NEZ PERCE DR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 270 258710020 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY KIFFIN 6520 NEZ PERCE DR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 271 258710010 SINGLE-FAMILY ZANE & ARCELIA DETERT 6500 NEZ PERCE DR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 272 258690020 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & MAREN REEDER 6501 TROENDLE CIR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 273 258690030 SINGLE-FAMILY CLAUS & LEONARDA CANELL 6531 TROENDLE CIR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 274 258690040 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & JODIE KUEPPERS 6541 TROENDLE CIR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 275 258690050 SINGLE-FAMILY JAY & LAURIE DONOHUE 6561 TROENDLE CIR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 276 258690060 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & KAREN FLYNN 6581 TROENDLE CIR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 277 258690070 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH CALDWELL 6590 TROENDLE CIR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 278 258690080 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & KATHLEEN ANDERSON 6580 TROENDLE CIR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 279 258690090 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEXANDER & KAITLIN HAAR 6560 TROENDLE CIR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 280 258690100 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN & JODIE GRADY 6540 TROENDLE CIR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 281 258690110 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN & KAREN WUJEK 6520 TROENDLE CIR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 282 258690120 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & KATHLEEN NORTON 6500 TROENDLE CIR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 283 258690010 SINGLE-FAMILY CURTIS BINDER 6481 NEZ PERCE DR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 284 258710210 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & FOTINI DONNELLY 6491 NEZ PERCE DR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 285 258730010 SINGLE-FAMILY PHILIP & LEEANNE LARSON 6493 NEZ PERCE DR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 286 258730020 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & AMY CONWAY 6495 NEZ PERCE DR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 287 258710060 SINGLE-FAMILY PAMELA LIBBY 6501 NEZ PERCE DR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 288 258710070 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & BARBARA HANSEN 6511 NEZ PERCE DR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 289 258710080 SINGLE-FAMILY WALTER & CONSTANCE LINDER 900 VINELAND CT 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 290 258710090 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & SARAH CAVIN 880 VINELAND CT 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 291 258710100 SINGLE-FAMILY DONALD & CANDACE DECOSSE 860 VINELAND CT 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 292 258710110 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & KATHERINE BENSON 840 VINELAND CT 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 293 258710120 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY & NESSA SANDER 820 VINELAND CT 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 294 258710130 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & ELIZABETH MANNING 861 VINELAND CT 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 295 258710140 SINGLE-FAMILY VITO & MELAINIE QUAGLIA 881 VINELAND CT 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 296 258710150 SINGLE-FAMILY DOUGLAS & DARLENE OLSEN 901 VINELAND CT 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 297 258710160 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHERIN HUYS 921 VINELAND CT 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Roadway Assessment Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA 422,000.00$ 7,670.00$ per REU PARCEL # PID # PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO. STREET REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Roadway Assessment Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA 298 258710170 SINGLE-FAMILY KORD & HEATHER BRASHEAR 6561 NEZ PERCE DR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 299 258710180 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & ALANA HOPP 6581 NEZ PERCE DR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 299A 258530030 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ANNE REV TRUST 6641 NEZ PERCE DR 1 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 55 TOTAL 168,740.00$ Assessment Totals 648,000.00$ 5,840.00$ per REU PARCEL # PID # PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO. STREET REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 1 253450130 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & DEBRA PRIGGE 390 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 2 253450120 SINGLE-FAMILY BISRAT & DENISE ALEMAYEHU 380 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 3 253450110 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & GAIL DIEDRICK 370 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 4 253450100 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & CAROL UDSTUEN 360 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 5 253450090 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & JULIE NESSLY 350 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 6 253450080 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW PATTEE & DONNA SPINELLI 340 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 7 253450070 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID LYONS & JULIE TENHOFF-LYONS 330 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 8 253450060 SINGLE-FAMILY KAREN OLSON 320 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 9 253450050 SINGLE-FAMILY CORY & AMY MILLER 310 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 10 253450040 SINGLE-FAMILY LEE & MARY KAUFMAN 300 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 11 253450030 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL ALBERTS & JENNIFER KOTTKE-ALBERTS 280 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 12 253450020 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & REBECCA BUSACKER 260 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 13 253450010 SINGLE-FAMILY KUE & CAROL VANG 250 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 14 253450140 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & DENISE MCALPIN 8001 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 $ 2,336.00 15 253450150 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & PAMELA MURPHY 8021 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 $ 2,336.00 16 253450160 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & LANA BERGO 8041 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 17 253450170 SINGLE-FAMILY STANLEY H LESTER 8061 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 18 253450180 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SONJA DENOW 8081 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 19 253450190 SINGLE-FAMILY JOANNE MARIE SOUSA 8091 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 20 253450200 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHRYN LESLIE RASMUSSEN 8101 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 21 253450210 SINGLE-FAMILY GREGORY & KAREN GMITERKO 8212 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 22 253450220 SINGLE-FAMILY SUSAN ROSE SULLIVAN 8141 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 23 253450230 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES RADTKE 8161 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 24 253450240 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & JEANNE HUNT 8181 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 25 253450250 SINGLE-FAMILY VENKATESH PARAMESHWARAN 8191 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 26 253450260 SINGLE-FAMILY LAMONTE & JANICE EASTVOLD 8180 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 27 253450270 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHAN & DENISE LEBENS 8170 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 28 253450280 SINGLE-FAMILY DALE & ZOLA KLABUNDE 8160 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 29 253450290 SINGLE-FAMILY DANA & EMILY SANDS 8150 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 30 253450300 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ADELL GLASER 8140 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 31 253450310 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & LINDA GIORDANO 8120 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 32 253450320 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN TODD BLACK 8100 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 33 253450330 SINGLE-FAMILY KAREN KLINSING 8090 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 34 253450340 SINGLE-FAMILY NGUYEN & BINH NGU CHAU 8080 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 35 253450350 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & AMBER WAHL 8060 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 36 253450360 SINGLE-FAMILY BRAIN & JEAN STECKLING 8040 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 37 253450370 SINGLE-FAMILY EDWARD & HANNAH RAUPP 8020 HIDDEN CT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 38 253450380 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & MICHELLE HAIK 261 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 39 253450390 SINGLE-FAMILY JESSICA LOVERING 270 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 40 253450400 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK LAKOSKY & JULIE STEVENSON 8000 HIDDEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 41 253450410 SINGLE-FAMILY ANDREW & EMMA TURNER 8010 HIDDEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 42 253450420 SINGLE-FAMILY LAUREN & SHAUNA KOPP 8020 HIDDEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 43 253450430 SINGLE-FAMILY SHANNON MCCLARD & SHERRIE PETERSON 8030 HIDDEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 44 253450440 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SUSAN BLAKE 8040 HIDDEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 45 253450450 SINGLE-FAMILY EVANGELINE CUBALCHINI 8051 HIDDEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 46 253450460 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK ASHWELL 8061 HIDDEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 47 253450470 SINGLE-FAMILY CLARISSA & FRANK TERSCHAN 8071 HIDDEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 48 253450480 SINGLE-FAMILY JOEL MATTHEWS 8081 HIDDEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 49 253450490 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & WHITNEY GOHAM 8091 HIDDEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 50 253450500 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & CARLA THOMPSON 311 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 51 253450510 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & JODI SCHLEYER 321 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 52 253450520 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & DEBORAH SEMKE 331 HIDDEN LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - MARSH DRIVE AREA Roadway Assessment Total Estimated Roadway Cost 648,000.00$ 5,840.00$ per REU PARCEL # PID # PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO. STREET REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - MARSH DRIVE AREA Roadway Assessment Total Estimated Roadway Cost 53 253450530 SINGLE-FAMILY BRANDON & JENNIFER HOUGHHAM 8103 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 54 253450540 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & PRUDENCE BUSCH 8113 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 55 253450550 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & ELIZABETH 8123 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 56 253450560 SINGLE-FAMILY MARY STUTELBERG 8133 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 57 253450570 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON& BRANDI STENSOS 8143 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 58 253450580 SINGLE-FAMILY SCOTT & CATHERINE GALLOWAY 8153 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 59 253450590 SINGLE-FAMILY RANDY & KRISTINE IMKER 8163 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 60 253450600 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD HLADKY 8173 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 61 253450610 SINGLE-FAMILY JEREMY & DANA STETZER 8183 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 62 253450620 SINGLE-FAMILY BRUCE & JOYCE BOJE 8193 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 63 253450630 SINGLE-FAMILY TERENCE & JOAN DEMETER 8203 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 64 253450640 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & GERALYNN COLOSEY 8223 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 65 253450650 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SUSAN THORUD 8243 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 66 253450660 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & MICHELLE AAS 8263 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 67 253450670 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBER & KATHLEEN OLMSTED 8283 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 68 253450680 SINGLE-FAMILY ANTHONY & JANET MERTES 8124 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 69 253450690 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & CHERYL KINSELLA 8118 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 70 253450700 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK RAY SCHUMACHER 8116 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 71 253450710 SINGLE-FAMILY CURTIS MATTERN & STACEY SEIM 8114 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 72 251820520 SINGLE-FAMILY PETER & JESSICA LAMBRECHT 8110 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 73 NOT USED 8108 DAKOTA LN 74 251820720 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN & HALLIE TIFFANY 8113 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 75 253450720 SINGLE-FAMILY NICKMARK LLC 8117 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 76 253450730 SINGLE-FAMILY BRENDA JANE WALSH 8121 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 77 253450740 SINGLE-FAMILY BLAKE SPILLERS & JENNIFER GRAHAM-SPILLERS 8123 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 78 253451090 SINGLE-FAMILY KRISSY & PETER DOHERTY 8127 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 79 253451080 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & ROSA SEIM 8129 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 80 253451070 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT MYERS 8131 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 81 253451060 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & SHERI LEWIS 8133 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 82 253451050 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & RENE LUCAS 8135 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 83 253451040 SINGLE-FAMILY JAY & REBECCA LEGLER 8137 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 84 253451030 SINGLE-FAMILY MARIE & DEAN SUND 8139 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 85 253451022 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & KATHRYNE SLAVICS 8140 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 86 253451010 SINGLE-FAMILY JON & SARAH HANSEN 8138 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 87 253451000 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL BOGDEN 8136 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 88 253450990 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & LAURIE LANGLEY 8134 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 89 253450980 SINGLE-FAMILY PHILIP & LUCILLE REHM 8132 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 90 253450970 SINGLE-FAMILY TERENCE & PEI LING JAMISON 8130 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 91 253450960 SINGLE-FAMILY DANLD WILDMAN 8128 DAKOTA LN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 92 253450950 SINGLE-FAMILY GENE & KIM HEIKKINEN 301 SINNEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 93 253450940 SINGLE-FAMILY AMY WESLEY 311 SINNEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 94 253450930 SINGLE-FAMILY TYLER & JANE PETERSON 321 SINNEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 95 253450920 SINGLE-FAMILY LOREN & KATHRYN SPENLER 331 SINNEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 96 253450910 SINGLE-FAMILY JAN WESTGAARD 341 SINNEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 97 253450900 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & PATRICIA HAMBLIN 340 SINNEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 98 253450890 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & KARIN OLSON 330 SINNEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 99 253450880 SINGLE-FAMILY LUKE & KIMBERLY NELSON 320 SINNEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 100 253450870 SINGLE-FAMILY ANGELA BIALCZYK 310 SINNEN CIR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 101 253450860 SINGLE-FAMILY DONOVAN LEE ISDAHL 8190 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 102 253450850 SINGLE-FAMILY CHERYL FELTON 8180 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 103 253450840 SINGLE-FAMILY KEITH & DIANA ANDERSON 8170 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 104 253450830 SINGLE-FAMILY DARRIN & MICHELLE ARLT 8160 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 648,000.00$ 5,840.00$ per REU PARCEL # PID # PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO. STREET REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - MARSH DRIVE AREA Roadway Assessment Total Estimated Roadway Cost 105 253450820 SINGLE-FAMILY BRUCE & CYNTHIA MARENGO 8150 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 106 253450810 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & SANDRA BERGGREN 8140 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 107 253450800 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & RITA KLAUDA 8130 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 108 253450790 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & STEPHANIE KLEIN 8120 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 109 253450780 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPH LESER & COLLEEN CANNON 8110 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 110 253450770 SINGLE-FAMILY TREVOR & JULIE MAASSEN 8100 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 111 253450760 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JENNIFER HELMICK 8090 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 112 253450750 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & LOIS SAVARD 8080 MARSH DR 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 111 TOTAL 259,296.00$ Assessment Totals 235,000.00$ 4,900.00$ per REU PARCEL # PID # PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO. STREET REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 198 252000510 SINGLE-FAMILY RANY & KRISTIN BAANA 6780 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 199 252000520 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHANIEL HERMAN & LORI BESSINGER 6790 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 200 252000530 SINGLE-FAMILY SANDRA WALTON 6800 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 201 252000540 SINGLE-FAMILY LAURA BEERS & BLAKE FREESE 6820 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 202 252000550 SINGLE-FAMILY DIRK KREMERS 6830 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 203 252000560 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN SMITH & ELIZABETH REASON 6840 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 204 252000570 SINGLE-FAMILY JACK & ANN DOWNEY 6850 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 205 252000580 SINGLE-FAMILY GLENN & LISA KAUFMANN 6870 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 206 252000590 SINGLE-FAMILY BETH FLOTTMEIER 6880 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 207 252000600 SINGLE-FAMILY LAUREL YOUNG 6890 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 208 252000610 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN WOOLCOTT 6900 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 209 252000620 SINGLE-FAMILY SHELLEY MEHL 6910 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 210 252000630 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEC YOUNG & ELIZABETH MATZEK 6920 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 211 252000250 SINGLE-FAMILY YAN KENT & ANN SEVERSON 6921 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 212 252000240 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT DEHN 6911 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 213 252000230 SINGLE-FAMILY MITCHELL& KATHLEEN FREIDERICH 6901 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 214 252200220 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ASHLEY SELLERS 6891 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 215 252000210 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & SUSANN JOHNSON 6881 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 216 252000200 SINGLE-FAMILY JERRY & CINDRA BAHMILLER 6871 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 217 252000190 SINGLE-FAMILY CASEY & KEVIN KURTT 6841 PENAMINT LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 218 252000180 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEY BRODAHL & TAMARA BRUESS 961 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 219 252000170 SINGLE-FAMILY JOEY & PATRICIA FLOE 951 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 220 252000160 SINGLE-FAMILY DEAN & LAURA BIRD 941 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 221 252000150 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & DEBRA LARSON 931 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 222 252000140 SINGLE-FAMILY ELEANOR & DIRK DOBBINS 921 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 223 252000130 SINGLE-FAMILY NANCY JEAN NORTH 911 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 224 252000120 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHRYN PETRICK 901 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 225 252000110 SINGLE-FAMILY BRYAN & CAROL MCGOVERN 900 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 226 252000100 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & AMY DEBLOCK 902 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 227 252000090 SINGLE-FAMILY LEROY & WANDA BITELER 910 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 228 252000080 SINGLE-FAMILY NICHOLAS JOHNSON & JENNIFER GLIDDEN 920 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 229 252000070 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & TAMARA ENGESETHER 930 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 230 252000060 SINGLE-FAMILY ANNE & DANA MOSTAD 940 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 231 252000050 SINGLE-FAMILY BRENT BAUER 950 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 232 252000040 SINGLE-FAMILY KEITH & JAYNE MOODY 960 PENAMINT CT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 233 252000030 SINGLE-FAMILY RAY & MARY MIKKONEN 6781 PENAMINT LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 234 252000020 SINGLE-FAMILY FOURCO LLC 6771 PENAMINT LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 235 252000360 SINGLE-FAMILY TIMOTHY & CHARLOTTE SAVALOJA 6770 PENAMINT LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 236 252000370 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHAN SERVEY & TAYLOR WALDIN 6780 PENAMINT LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 237 252000380 SINGLE-FAMILY JOEL & ALEXIA SUITER 6790 PENAMINT LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 238 252000390 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & MELISSA BROICH 6800 PENAMINT LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 239 252000400 SINGLE-FAMILY BRUCE SCHULTZ 6820 PENAMINT LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 240 252000410 SINGLE-FAMILY HEIDI & MICHAEL COLGAN 6830 PENAMINT LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 241 252000420 SINGLE-FAMILY IH2 PROPERTY BORROWER LP 6840 PENAMINT LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 242 252000430 SINGLE-FAMILY DALE & MARY ANDERSON 6821 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Roadway Assessment Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - REDWING LANE AREA 235,000.00$ 4,900.00$ per REU PARCEL # PID # PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO. STREET REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Roadway Assessment Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - REDWING LANE AREA 243 252000440 SINGLE-FAMILY CHAD SHARKEY & SARAH FORSMAN 6801 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 244 252000450 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & JESSICA SHAUGHNESSY 6791 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 245 252000460 SINGLE-FAMILY ARNOLD & LORNA LEMKE 6781 REDWING LN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 48 TOTAL 94,080.00$ Assessment Totals 1,897,000.00$ 7,620.00$ per REU PARCEL # PID # PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO. STREET REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 300 252110010 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & SARA MUENCH 6400 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 301 252110020 SINGLE-FAMILY PATRICK & WILHELMINE GALLAGHER 6390 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 302 252110030 SINGLE-FAMILY KEVIN & DEBRA COOPER 6380 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 303 252110040 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & BRYAN WEIGEL 6370 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 304 252110050 SINGLE-FAMILY JONNA SHIELDS 6360 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 305 252110060 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & GERI MURPHY 201 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 306 252130130 SINGLE-FAMILY SARAH PRUETT & ERIC CHULMAN 211 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 307 252130120 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & JANE HOGAN 221 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 308 252130110 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID PELTIER 231 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 309 252130100 SINGLE-FAMILY SANDRA REISHUS & MEGAN JENSEN 241 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 310 252130090 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD EWALD & POLLY STIVLAND 251 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 311 252130080 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHAN & MARTHA SCHRADER 261 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 312 252130070 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & TIFFANY FISCO 271 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 313 258640040 SINGLE-FAMILY KAREN LARSEN 9365 TIMBER HILL RD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 314 258640050 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & SUSAN VOELKER 300 TIMBER HILL RD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 315 258640090 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & STEPHANIE DILLE 291 TIMBER HILL RD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 316 258640080 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK HODDER & XUNYU QIAN 301 TIMBER HILL RD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 317 258640070 SINGLE-FAMILY TODD & SHELLEY KOLAND 311 TIMBER HILL RD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 318 258640060 SINGLE-FAMILY CHARLES & LINNETTE BETTS 6331 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 319 258650130 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & KATIE WENDORFF 6341 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 320 258650140 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & ALICE KLINKENBERG 6351 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 321 258650150 SINGLE-FAMILY BRET & JENNIFER BARHOOVER 6421 ROJINA LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 322 258650160 SINGLE-FAMILY JAYNE ARABANOS 6420 ROJINA LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 323 258650170 SINGLE-FAMILY LORI & TROY ROOVERS 6410 ROJINA LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 324 258650180 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & SYDNEY ROSENBERG 6355 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 325 258650190 SINGLE-FAMILY AMY & SCOTT HAIRSTON 6357 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 326 258650200 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFERY & SALLY GADBOIS 6359 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 327 258070010 SINGLE-FAMILY PETER & KATHERINE LUCAS 6363 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 328 258090010 SINGLE-FAMILY RANDAL & BRECK STORTS 6365 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 329 258090020 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & JULIETTE SCHNEIDER 6367 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 330 258090120 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL CARR 6369 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 331 258090110 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & SARAH EBELING 6371 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 332 258090100 SINGLE-FAMILY CYNTHIA COLSON 6373 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 333 258090090 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & MICHELLE STORK 6375 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 334 258090080 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & SUZANNE BOHN 6377 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 335 258090070 SINGLE-FAMILY BRADLEY BILLINGS & ANITA CORNELIUS 6379 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 336 258090060 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEXANDER & KARENEA LAI 3020 FAIRWAY DR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 337 258090050 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & KAREN CONBOY 6383 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 338 258090040 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & KRISTEN HANSBERRY 6385 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 339 258090030 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & DIANA DAVIS 6387 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 340 258090160 SINGLE-FAMILY TIMOTHY KOCHER & CATHERINE CONNEL 6389 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 341 258090170 SINGLE-FAMILY KEVIN & KATHERIN WORMS-LYNCH 6391 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 342 258090180 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL NOBLE & BONNIE BURNS 6393 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 343 258090190 SINGLE-FAMILY GLENNA & CARIN STOLAR 6395 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 344 258070210 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & ANN MARIE HAYES 6397 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 345 258070220 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & LISA SIMMONS 6399 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 346 258070230 SINGLE-FAMILY TINA & JORDAN LAMB 6401 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 347 258580110 SINGLE-FAMILY COREY & JULIE SMITH 501 TRAPLINE LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 348 258580100 SINGLE-FAMILY ROGER & GAYLE STECH 491 TRAPLINE LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 349 258580090 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SHALINI CARNEY 481 TRAPLINE LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 350 258580080 SINGLE-FAMILY KEVIN CAMPBELL 461 TRAPLINE LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 351 258580070 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & LINDA ROSLANKSKY 431 TRAPLINE LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ Roadway Assessment CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - TRAPPERS PASS AREA 1,897,000.00$ 7,620.00$ per REU PARCEL # PID # PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO. STREET REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT Roadway Assessment CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - TRAPPERS PASS AREA 352 258580060 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEXANDRA WOODS 421 TRAPLINE LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 353 258570080 SINGLE-FAMILY IGOR KOROLEV & KAREN JORDAN 401 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 354 258570070 SINGLE-FAMILY JENNIFER & JOSEPH BECKMAN 381 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 355 258570060 SINGLE-FAMILY WAYNE & PAMELA BENBOW 361 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 356 258570050 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SONJA PRETASKY 341 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 357 258570040 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN & STACY ROHAN 321 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 358 258570030 SINGLE-FAMILY RONALD & LYDIA VELANDER 301 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 359 258570020 SINGLE-FAMILY THEODORE & HILARY BECKMAN 291 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 360 258570010 SINGLE-FAMILY TREVOR & LYN MCCULLOCH 251 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 361 252140050 SINGLE-FAMILY SACHA LIVING 6260 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 362 252140060 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & SALLY BICKEL 6240 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 363 252140070 SINGLE-FAMILY HAYLEY & DAVIS ZISMER 6220 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 364 252140080 SINGLE-FAMILY ADAM & HEATHER WILFORD 6210 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 365 252140010 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & HEIDI PRESTEEN 6201 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 366 252140020 SINGLE-FAMILY PETER & JANET MADDALENA 6221 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 367 252140030 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & KRISTINE MOES 6241 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 368 252140040 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & MARY JO BROKAW 6261 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 369 252120010 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & LISA HAZZARD 241 PIEDMONT CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 370 252120020 SINGLE-FAMILY ALLAN GREEN & KRISTINE SEVERSON-GREEN 221 PIEDMONT CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 371 252120030 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & LAURA ORCUTT 210 PIEDMONT CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 372 252120040 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN & LISA CARLSON 6281 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 373 252110210 SINGLE-FAMILY FRANK & CATHERINE ZIMMERMAN 6291 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 374 252110200 SINGLE-FAMILY EDWIN & REBECCA EVERETT 6301 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 375 252110190 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & LINDA BENDT 6311 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 376 252110180 SINGLE-FAMILY VARSHA KANDLIKAR 6331 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 377 252110170 SINGLE-FAMILY LOREN & DEBORAH GORDON 6351 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 378 252110160 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & SUSAN BRADY 6371 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 379 252110150 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & SUSAN REISS 6391 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 380 252090180 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & ALEXANDRA BIXLER 6340 CASTLE RDG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 381 252090170 SINGLE-FAMILY NORMA KEIVES 6232 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 382 252090160 SINGLE-FAMILY PATRICK & ALISHA MURRAY 6230 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 383 252090150 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & AMY BURTON 6228 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 384 252090140 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & LAURINDA SCHUMACHER 6226 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 385 252090130 SINGLE-FAMILY DONALD & CHRISTINE SNEDE 6224 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 386 252090120 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & MARIAN HEINEMANN 6222 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 387 252090110 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & KATHLEEN ALBRECHT 6220 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 388 252090100 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & NANCY RYDLAND 6218 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 389 252090090 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & MARGO ANDERSON 6216 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 390 252090080 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN & SARA YOCHUM 6214 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 391 252100110 SINGLE-FAMILY ALICE LAINE 185 CASCADE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 392 252100100 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JANICE MOSTROM 183 CASCADE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 393 252100090 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & AIMEE ANDREOTTI 181 CASCADE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 394 252100080 SINGLE-FAMILY TODD & SARAH MCCUTCHEON 180 CASCADE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 395 252100070 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & DOROTHY BELLING 170 CASCADE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 396 252100060 SINGLE-FAMILY TRAVIS LEMKE & KELLI BROWER 160 CASCADE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 397 252100050 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JAMIELYNN AHLSTEDT 150 CASCADE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 398 252100040 SINGLE-FAMILY PETER & KAREN MURRAY 6208 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 399 252100030 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & MICHELLE KLISANICH 6206 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 400 252100020 SINGLE-FAMILY DEREK & MELISSA STEVENS 6204 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 401 252100010 SINGLE-FAMILY ANTHONY & AMY HORNING 6202 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 402 252070010 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY & JOAN TAM 6200 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 403 255500040 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFEREY SCHRIMPF 98 CASCADE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 1,897,000.00$ 7,620.00$ per REU PARCEL # PID # PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO. STREET REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT Roadway Assessment CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - TRAPPERS PASS AREA 404 255500050 SINGLE-FAMILY NANCY STORM 96 CASCADE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 405 255500060 SINGLE-FAMILY DOUGLAS & ANGELA HOWE 94 CASCADE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 406 255500070 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ELIZABETH SCAMAN 92 CASCADE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 407 255500080 SINGLE-FAMILY TERENCE MEYER 90 CASCADE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 408 255500090 SINGLE-FAMILY MARY BRANDT 88 CASCADE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 409 255500100 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & JENNIFER DISNEY 86 CASCADE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 410 255500110 SINGLE-FAMILY LISA MARIE SHENCK 87 CASCADE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 411 255500120 SINGLE-FAMILY JAY & KELLY BEAUDRY 89 CASCADE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 412 255500130 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID BENNETT 91 CASCADE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 413 255500140 SINGLE-FAMILY MEAGHAN & STEVEN VANDERSANDEN 93 CASCADE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 414 255500150 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMI & KAREN SCHUPP 95 CASCADE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 415 255500160 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & REBECCA OLSON 97 CASCADE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 416 255500170 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEXANDR BEZVERKHNIY & GALINA ZAIKOVSKAYA 96 SHASTA CIR E 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 417 255500180 SINGLE-FAMILY JOE SIMMONS 94 SHASTA CIR E 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 418 255500190 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & KATHLEEN MAHANNAH 92 SHASTA CIR E 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 419 255500200 SINGLE-FAMILY ROVERT & KATHY REIMLER 90 SHASTA CIR E 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 420 255500210 SINGLE-FAMILY CARL HAWKINSON 88 SHASTA CIR E 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 421 255500220 SINGLE-FAMILY BRETT WILLIAMS & BRIDGET BURKEL 91 SHASTA CIR E 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 422 255500230 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & JANN VARNER 93 SHASTA CIR E 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 423 255500240 SINGLE-FAMILY NATALIE MARIE HARVEY 95 SHASTA CIR E 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 424 255500250 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN 97 SHASTA CIR E 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 425 255500260 SINGLE-FAMILY JODI LATWOOD 96 OLYMPIC CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 426 255500270 SINGLE-FAMILY ALBERT & JANINE AFFLITTO 94 OLYMPIC CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 427 255500280 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & LESLIE MCKEAN 92 OLYMPIC CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 428 255500290 SINGLE-FAMILY KURT & MAIA KNOX 90 OLYMPIC CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 429 255500300 SINGLE-FAMILY JERRY & CAROL MCDONALD 88 OLYMPIC CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 430 255500310 SINGLE-FAMILY GARY & SHARON HARRIS 91 OLYMPIC CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 431 255500320 SINGLE-FAMILY RAJIV & KAVYYA DAMA 93 OLYMPIC CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 432 255500330 SINGLE-FAMILY CARA BENOIT 95 OLYMPIC CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 433 255500340 SINGLE-FAMILY YEAN CHING TAN & GIBSON NENE 97 OLYMPIC CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 434 252080190 SINGLE-FAMILY KARIM & FAIDA MAMMADOVA 98 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 435 252080180 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHAN & COLLEEN HATZUNG 96 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 436 252080170 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & HEIDI NAUMAN 92 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 437 252080160 SINGLE-FAMILY NANCY LUNDGREN-SMITH 90 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 438 252080150 SINGLE-FAMILY BRADY HORMANN 88 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 439 252080140 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL KRUGER & DEBORAH ROBERTS 86 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 440 252080130 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON & JEAN RUSINAK 84 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 441 252080120 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSHUA & KELLI BILLS 82 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 442 252080110 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFERY & CATHERINE BRECKHEIMER 81 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 443 252080100 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & TIFFANY KLINKENBERG 83 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 444 252080090 SINGLE-FAMILY DELLY DEWITT 85 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 445 252080080 SINGLE-FAMILY DEREK & JAMIE NELSON 87 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 446 252080070 SINGLE-FAMILY REBECCA KNEZEVIC 89 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 447 252080060 SINGLE-FAMILY JENNIFER & CRAIG RAUEN 91 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 448 252080050 SINGLE-FAMILY LEE & KAREN BORIL 93 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 449 252080040 SINGLE-FAMILY TRISTAN & ADRIENNE AGRE 95 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 450 252080030 SINGLE-FAMILY SARAH SWEDLUND 97 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 451 252080020 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JAMIE MANNING 99 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 452 252080010 SINGLE-FAMILY ANDREW & ELIZABETH GUSTAFSON 101 CASTLE RIDGE CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 453 258070200 SINGLE-FAMILY MIKEAL BYSTROM JR 6300 SUMMIT CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 454 258070190 SINGLE-FAMILY ALICIA JEAN PAVELKO 6306 SUMMIT CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 455 258070180 SINGLE-FAMILY KELLY NEVERMANN 6310 SUMMIT CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 1,897,000.00$ 7,620.00$ per REU PARCEL # PID # PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO. STREET REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT Roadway Assessment CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - TRAPPERS PASS AREA 456 258070170 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & CHELSEA MILLER 6320 SUMMIT CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 457 258070160 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & ALISON BUICK 6330 SUMMIT CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 458 258070150 SINGLE-FAMILY EVAN MARIASH & KELLY FIDGEON 6340 SUMMIT CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 459 258070140 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SARAH WENTZIEN 6350 SUMMIT CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 460 258090150 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & CHRISTINE STONE 6370 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 461 258090140 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & KENAN GUILMETTE 6368 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 462 258090130 SINGLE-FAMILY JOAN & BURTON BENSON 6366 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 463 258070130 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & SARAH WAY 6341 SUMMIT CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 464 258070120 SINGLE-FAMILY DERRICK BILDERBEEK & DYAN PADGETT 6331 SUMMIT CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 465 258070110 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN & AMY KROLL 6321 SUMMIT CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 466 258070100 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & JERILYN HOOKS 6311 SUMMIT CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 467 258070090 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & TERRY DENUCCI 6301 SUMMIT CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 468 258070080 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN & JEANNINE SMITH 6408 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 469 258580120 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JULIA NEWELL 411 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 470 258580130 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JEANENE CONZEMIUS 430 TRAPLINE LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 471 258580140 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHRYN & JOHN WILLIAMS 460 TRAPLINE LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 472 258580150 SINGLE-FAMILY KASHIF HASAN & SHAHEEN IQBAL 480 TRAPLINE LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 473 258580160 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN ERICKSON & JENNIFER SMOLKA 500 TRAPLINE LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 474 258070020 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & JILL JOHNSON 6403 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 475 258070030 SINGLE-FAMILY TIMOTHY & JEANNE PIETRINI 6405 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 476 258070040 SINGLE-FAMILY HOLLY & TONY FERRARO 6407 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 477 258070050 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & KIMBERLY COREY 6409 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 478 258070060 SINGLE-FAMILY LINDA & TIMOTHY RUDE 6411 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 479 258070070 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JILL RAMSEY 6362 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 480 258650010 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & JILL KOKKINEN 431 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 481 258650020 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & LIZABETH MONTGOMERY 6300 STAG HORN LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 482 258650030 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & JANE MCGINTY 6310 STAG HORN LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 483 258650040 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & LAURA WILLIAMS 6311 STAG HORN LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 484 258650050 SINGLE-FAMILY DOUGLAS & STEPHANIE HAALAND 6321 STAG HORN LN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 485 258570110 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & SAMANTHA CASSIOPPI 6301 TRAPLINE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 486 258570120 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN & JANE WARNER 6311 TRAPLINE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 487 258570130 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & MELISSA SUNDBOOM 6321 TRAPLINE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 488 258570140 SINGLE-FAMILY BRANDT & KATHY COLVILLE 6331 TRAPLINE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 489 258570150 SINGLE-FAMILY IGOR & ANASTASIA ARKHIPENKOV 6340 TRAPLINE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 490 258570160 SINGLE-FAMILY ALYESKA PROPERTIES 6330 TRAPLINE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 491 258570170 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & DEBORAH LEUY 6320 TRAPLINE CIR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 492 258650060 SINGLE-FAMILY MARC WITTENBERG 410 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 493 258650070 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & TARA STONE 420 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 494 258650080 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & AMY JOINER 430 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 495 258650090 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & KATHERINE O'BRIEN 6358 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 496 258650100 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & NANCY GIESE 6356 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 497 258650110 SINGLE-FAMILY IAN & SALLY SHEPHERD 6354 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 498 258650120 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & LAURIE FLECK 6352 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 499 258640030 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & PAMELA PITTENGER 6350 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 500 258640020 SINGLE-FAMILY LISA MURIEL LUND 6340 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 501 258640010 SINGLE-FAMILY LANDON & SARAH GUILDAY 6330 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 502 258580050 SINGLE-FAMILY MARY GOAD-OLSON 6320 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 503 258580040 SINGLE-FAMILY CARL & ALEXIS FRIEDR 6310 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 504 258580030 SINGLE-FAMILY KEVIN & BROOKE SLAMA 6300 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 505 258570090 SINGLE-FAMILY ADAM & ROBBIN SCHAFER 300 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 506 258570100 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & NICOLE CAMPION 340 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 507 258570180 SINGLE-FAMILY RAMON & PATRICIA CONTRERAS 250 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 1,897,000.00$ 7,620.00$ per REU PARCEL # PID # PROPERTY TYPE OWNER STREET NO. STREET REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT Roadway Assessment CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - TRAPPERS PASS AREA 508 258570190 SINGLE-FAMILY TERESA HODNET 290 TRAPPERS PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 509 258580010 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & BARBARA ROY 6301 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 510 258580020 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBER & MARLYS SCHWABE 6311 OXBOW BND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 511 252130010 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & JUNE BENTRUP 260 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 512 252130020 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & EMILY STRONG 250 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 513 252130030 SINGLE-FAMILY CATHERINE & STEVEN NORRIS 240 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 514 252130040 SINGLE-FAMILY ABIGAIL & JUSTIN KLOUS 230 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 515 252130050 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & KAREN CASEY 220 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 516 252130060 SINGLE-FAMILY BURCH & MARTHA SCHULTZ 210 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 517 252110140 SINGLE-FAMILY HPA JV BORROWER 200 MOUNTAIN WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 518 252110130 SINGLE-FAMILY TIMOTHTY & LORI DOSEN 6330 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 519 252110120 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & MARGERITE BOROWSKI 201 MOUNTIAN VIEW CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 520 252110110 SINGLE-FAMILY MARY JOAN LORENZEN 221 MOUNTAIN VIEW CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 521 252110100 SINGLE-FAMILY REBEKAH DUNHAM 241 MOUNTAIN VIEW CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 522 252110090 SINGLE-FAMILY CYNTHIA & JOHN PUGH 260 MOUNTAIN VIEW CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 523 252110080 SINGLE-FAMILY JUSTIN & APRIL UELAND 280 MOUNTAIN VIEW CT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 524 252110070 SINGLE-FAMILY GREGORY & LEAH THOMPSON 6300 NEAR MOUNTAIN BLVD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 525 252070020 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID CARLSON & CAROLE FICK 6199 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 526 252100120 SINGLE-FAMILY SHANNA O'BRIEN 6201 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 527 252100130 SINGLE-FAMILY JUDITH JAMES 6203 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 528 252100140 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & MICAELA YANDA 6205 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 529 252100150 SINGLE-FAMILY SEAN KNUTSEN 6207 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 530 252100160 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & SANDRA BUTLER 6209 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 531 252090010 SINGLE-FAMILY CHERYL MAGERS 6211 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 532 252090020 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & CHERYL AYOTTE 6213 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 533 252090030 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & ANTOINETTE SCHRUPP 6215 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 534 252090040 SINGLE-FAMILY CAMERON & CATHERINE GUTHRIE 6217 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 535 252090050 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & DIANE RUGLAND 6219 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 536 252090060 SINGLE-FAMILY KYLE JOHNSON 6221 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 537 252090070 SINGLE-FAMILY TODD & LEE MORTENSON 6223 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 538 255500470 SINGLE-FAMILY SCOTT STALMAN & KATHERIN GLYNN 6225 CASCADE PASS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 539 255500460 SINGLE-FAMILY NANCY ANN MYHRE 6320 CASTLE RDG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 540 255500450 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT DOHERTY 6310 CASTLE RDG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 541 255500440 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN WEINZIERL & LAUREN CALLAHAN 6300 CASTLE RDG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 542 255500430 SINGLE-FAMILY 101 SHASTA LLC 101 SHASTA CIR W 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 543 255500420 SINGLE-FAMILY MARNEE SHEPARD 111 SHASTA CIR W 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 544 255500410 SINGLE-FAMILY CARLTON & ANNE MOORE 121 SHASTA CIR W 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 545 255500400 SINGLE-FAMILY GLEN FEUERBORN 130 SHASTA CIR W 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 546 252070040 SINGLE-FAMILY LARRY & GAIL BEUNING 120 SHASTA CIR W 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 547 252070030 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & MARY GIOVINCO 110 SHASTA CIR W 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 548 255500370 SINGLE-FAMILY LISA & EDWARD ESTLOW 100 SHASTA CIR W 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 249 TOTAL 758,952.00$ Assessment Totals Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley 2020 2024thru Department Street Improvements Description Annual project to rehabilitate and reconstruct streets in the City. The following streets are scheduled to be completed in 2020, future areas will be determined by available funds and condition of the streets. 2020 Minnewashta Parkway (MSA, 2020 & 2021) and Lake Lucy-TH41 to Galpin Blvd (MSA) Krvers Point, Willow View, Twin Maple and Basswood Stone Creek Drive, Boulder Road, Stone Creek Ct, Stone Creek Ln, etc. Hidden Lane, Hidden Circle, Hidden Court, Marsh Drive, Sinnen Circle and Dakota Lane Lake Lucy, Nez Perce, Vineland Court and Troendle Circle Brendan Court Project #ST-012 Priority n/a Justification The City uses a Pavement Management System to monitor the condition of the City streets. While proper preventative maintenance extends the life of the street and is cost effective, a street will eventually deteriorate to a point that major maintenance is required. Rehabilitation projects extend the life of the street. In cases when utilities or poor sub grade needs to be replaced or where streets have deteriorated to a point where rehabilitation will no longer be practical, reconstruction of the street is necessary. A feasibility study is written to consider the merits of the project and scope of work. Budget Impact/Other This project may decrease maintenance costs. Useful Life Unassigned Project Name Annual Street Improvement Program Category Streets/Highways Type Improvement Account #2 Account #1 601-xxxx-4751 Total Project Cost:$56,694,000 Account #4 Account #3 Total20202021202220232024Expenditures 30,664,0006,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000Construction 6,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000 30,664,000Total Prior 26,030,000 Total Total20202021202220232024FundingSources 17,620,0002,582,500 3,637,500 3,700,000 3,800,000 3,900,000Assessment/Revolving Assess Fund 3,333,0001,716,500 1,516,500 100,000MSA 1,685,000192,500 517,500 325,000 325,000 325,000SewerUtilityFund 2,771,000185,500 785,500 600,000 600,000 600,000SurfaceWaterUtilityFund 5,255,0001,550,000 1,605,000 700,000 700,000 700,000WaterUtilityFund 6,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000 30,664,000Total Prior 26,030,000 Total 89 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-05 City of Chanhassen, Minnesota April 13, 2020 kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651 645 4197 April 13, 2020 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attn: George Bender, P.E. Assistant City Engineer RE: Feasibility Report: City Project 20-05 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council, The enclosed feasibility report has been prepared for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project 20-05, as authorized at the January 13, 2020 City Council meeting. This report investigates the rehabilitation of 6.5 miles of roadway throughout the City of Chanhassen including the following general areas: Lake Lucy Road Area, Choctaw Circle Area, Kurvers Point Road Area, Marsh Drive Area, Redwing Lane Area, and Trappers Pass Area. The investigation includes the following: roadway pavement rehabilitation, curb and gutter replacement, storm sewer and drain tile improvements, and minor water main and sanitary sewer improvements for the project areas. The proposed scope of work, estimated costs, financing, and schedule for improvements are detailed in this report. All 6.5 miles of roadway investigated under this report cannot be completed within the available City budget for the project. The recommended improvements were prioritized to make best use of the available budget along with addressing as much of the original project scope as possible. Information utilized in the preparation of this report included utility as-builts, information gathered through field reviews, GIS information, property owner information meetings and discussions with City staff. All available information was reviewed and considered to determine the feasibility of the proposed improvements. We believe that the proposed improvements identified in this report are feasible, that they will benefit the properties in the project area, and that they will benefit the City of Chanhassen. Sincerely, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Chadd Larson, P.E. Project Manager 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION Feasibility Report CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT 20-05 Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. I hereby certify that this plan, specification 767 Eustis Street or report was prepared by me or under my Suite 100 direct supervision and that I am duly St. Paul, MN 55114 Licensed Professional Engineer under the (651) 645-4197 laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature: __________________________ Chadd Larson, P.E. File: 160511046 Date: April 13, 2020 Lic. No. 41864 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 5 PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................................................................... 6 Street Improvements .............................................................................................................................. 6 Storm Sewer and Drainage Analysis ...................................................................................................... 7 Lake Lucy Road Area ................................................................................................................... 7 Redwing Lane Area ...................................................................................................................... 7 Choctaw Circle Area ..................................................................................................................... 8 Kurvers Point Road Area .............................................................................................................. 8 Marsh Drive Area .......................................................................................................................... 8 Trappers Pass Area ...................................................................................................................... 8 Sanitary Sewer ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Watermain ............................................................................................................................................ 9 Right-Of-Way and Easement Requirements ........................................................................................ 10 PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT ................................................................................................... 10 ESTIMATED COSTS .................................................................................................................................. 10 METHOD OF FINANCING .......................................................................................................................... 11 Estimated Assessments ....................................................................................................................... 12 Lake Lucy Road Area ................................................................................................................. 12 Redwing Lane Area .................................................................................................................... 12 Choctaw Circle Area ................................................................................................................... 12 Kurvers Point Road Area ............................................................................................................ 13 Marsh Drive Area ........................................................................................................................ 13 Trappers Pass Area .................................................................................................................... 13 PROJECT SCHEDULE ............................................................................................................................... 13 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................... 14 A PPENDICES APPENDIX A – EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 1 – Project Location Map EXHIBIT 2 – Typical Section EXHIBIT 3 – Roadway Improvements EXHIBIT 4 – Utility Improvements EXHIBIT 5 – Proposed Assessment Map APPENDIX B – PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE INFORMATION APPENDIX C – DETAILED COST ESTIMATES APPENDIX D – PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 3 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This feasibility report has been prepared for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project 20-05. The originally programmed project includes improvements to approximately 6.5 miles of local roadways within the City of Chanhassen in 6 distinct areas including the Lake Lucy Road Area, Redwing Lane Area, Choctaw Circle Area, Kurvers Point Road Area, Marsh Drive Area, and Trappers Pass Area. The following is a list of improvements evaluated for each area: • Pavement rehabilitation by full depth reclamation (FDR) or mill and overlay. • Spot curb and gutter replacement. • Drain tile replacement and installation. • Storm sewer structure improvements. • Sanitary sewer manhole improvements. • Water main, hydrant, gate valve and valve bolt replacement. The estimated cost for the proposed improvements for all project areas is shown below. These costs include a 5% construction cost contingency and an allowance for indirect costs. A summary of costs for each individual area can be found later in this report. IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED COSTS Roadway Improvements $3,879,000 Storm Sewer Improvements $345,000 Sanitary Sewer Improvements $209,000 Watermain Improvements $340,000 Indirect Costs $300,000 Total Project Improvements $5,073,000 The project cost for all areas combined exceeds the City’s CIP budget for 2020. To reduce the project scope to fit within the City’s CIP budget, it is recommended that the roadway, storm sewer and utility improvements for the Trappers Pass, Choctaw Circle and Redwing Lane area be constructed in 2020. The totaled estimated cost for this reduced project scope is $3,227,000. The improvements to the remaining project areas could be included in a future project. Below is a summary of a financing plan for a project including the three areas identified above. 2020 Financing Source (Trappers Pass Area, Choctaw Circle Area, Redwing Lane Area) Amount General Funds $1,298,768 Surface Water Utility Fund $185,500 Sewer Utility Fund $192,500 Water Utility Fund $600,000 Special Assessments $950,232 Total $3,227,000 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 4 If the City Council chooses to accept this report, we recommend that the following project schedule be followed: City Council Receive Final Feasibility Report Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specs Call Public Hearing April 13, 2020 Public Hearing April 27, 2020 Council Approves Plans and Specs Authorize Advertisement for Bids May 25, 2020 Bid Opening June 19, 2020 Neighborhood Meeting June 30, 2020 Assessment Hearing & Council Awards Contract July 13, 2020 Begin Construction Late July 2020 Substantial Construction Complete November 2020 Based upon the analysis completed as part of this report, the proposed 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project 20-05, are feasible, necessary, and cost effective, and would benefit the properties in the project area and the City of Chanhassen. We recommend the following: A. The City Council accepts this feasibility report and authorizes preparation of plans and specifications and calling of a public hearing for improvements to the Trappers Pass, Choctaw Circle and Redwing Lane areas. 5 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 INTRODUCTION On January 13, 2020, the Chanhassen City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project 20-05. The proposed project includes improvements to approximately 6.5 miles of local roadways spread throughout the City of Chanhassen. These areas have only received general maintenance since the original street construction as described below: • Lake Lucy Road Area – Approximately 0.7 miles of roadway located east of Powers Blvd (CR 17) constructed between 1988 and 1992. • Redwing Lane Area – Approximately 0.5 miles of roadway located east of Powers Blvd (CR 17) and south of the Lake Lucy Road area constructed in 1980. • Choctaw Circle Area – Approximately 0.4 miles of roadway located west of TH 101 and adjacent to Lotus Lake constructed in 1978. • Kurvers Point Road Area – Approximately 0.6 miles of roadway located west of TH 101 and south of the Choctaw Circle Area constructed between 1991 and 1992. • Marsh Drive Area – Approximately 1.0 mile of roadway located north of Rice Marsh Lake and south of TH 5 constructed in 1986. • Trappers Pass Area – Approximately 3 miles of roadway located west of TH 101 constructed between 1985 and 1994. No major pavement rehabilitation has been performed on these roadways since their original construction, resulting in deterioration of roadways and a need for improvements. None of these roadways were originally constructed per the City’s current standard street section which includes a sand sub-base and drain tile; however, localized areas of the roadways have had subsequent drainage improvements completed. Minor improvements and repairs that have not already been completed will also be made to public utilities in the project areas. The proposed project includes the following improvements within the six project areas: • Pavement rehabilitation by full depth reclamation (FDR) or mill and overlay. • Spot curb and gutter replacement. • Drain tile replacement and installation. • Storm sewer structure improvements. • Sanitary sewer manhole improvements. • Water main, hydrant, gate valve and valve bolt replacement. A project location map is shown in Appendix A, Exhibit 1. 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 6 PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS The original program was to include improvements to six separate neighborhoods throughout the City of Chanhassen. The areas were chosen based on the maintenance history, year they were constructed and pavement condition. The majority of roadways within all project areas do not have trail or sidewalk . There is a limited number of pedestrian ramps located within the project areas. The ramps have previously been upgraded to meet current ADA standards and are not included as part of this project. The following is a summary of the proposed street and utility improvements included as part of this project. STREET IMPROVEMENTS The City evaluates the condition of street pavement based on an overall condition index (OCI) every three years. A street with an OCI less than 49 is considered in poor condition. All project areas identified in the project scope are in poor condition and in need of repairs. A geotechnical report prepared by American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) was completed on March 11, 2020 for the City of Chanhassen. The report evaluated different pavement rehabilitation techniques ranging from mill and overlay to full reconstruction for each project area. Soil borings, pavement cores and ground penetrating radar (GPR) where performed in each project area to determine the existing pavement and underlying soil conditions. The findings from the geotechnical report indicate that full depth reclamation (FDR) is the preferred rehabilitation technique for most of the roadways. Mill and overlay was also determined to be feasible on some of the roadways. FDR consists of creating a recycled aggregate base made up of the existing bituminous pavement and underlying base material. A new section of bituminous is then paved on top of the recycled base. Mill and overlay only removes the upper section of the existing bituminous and does not allow for improvements to the aggregate base material to be made. Based on information in the geotechnical report and coordination with City staff, each area was evaluated for the appropriate pavement rehabilitation method. The same technique will be used on all roads in each individual area to provide a consistent final product and construction efficiency. Full reconstruction of the roadways was considered but eliminated from further evaluation due to available project budget. The following table summarizes the recommended treatment and the range of OCI’s for each project area. PROJECT AREA OCI RANGE MILES OF ROADWAY REHABILITATION TREATMENT Lake Lucy Road Area 13.65 – 36.45 0.7 FDR Redwing Lane Area 38.08 – 67.71 0.5 Mill & Overlay Choctaw Circle Area 24.81 – 44.2 0.4 Mill & Overlay Kurvers Point Road Area 12.98 – 34.29 0.6 FDR Marsh Drive Area 27.64 – 39.67 1.0 FDR Trappers Pass Area 17.39 – 48.54 3.0 FDR Since the pavement reclamation and mill and overlay processes can be completed without removal of curb and gutter, only spot replacement will be necessary to address surface drainage and poor curb and gutter conditions. Replacement locations include areas of observed settlement, utility excavation areas, and as determined by the field engineer during construction. An allocation of 10% of total curb length was included in the cost estimate for spot replacement. The actual limits of replacement will not be determined 7 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 until construction. In 2017, the City performed curb and drain tile replacement in the western half of the Trappers Pass area; therefore, only 5% curb replacement was estimated for this area. The City performed a field review of the drain tile in each project area and provided recommended improvements that are included in the cost estimate for this project. The improvements include replacement of existing drain tile that is in poor condition and adding new drain tile in areas where reoccurring drainage issues have occurred. The proposed roadway improvements are included in Appendix A, Exhibits 2 and 3. STORM S EWER AND DRAINAGE ANALYSIS The project areas fall within two watershed districts; Minnehaha Creek (Lake Lucy Road and Redwing Lane areas) and Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek (Choctaw Circle, Kurvers Point Road, Marsh Drive, and Trappers Pass areas). There are no triggers for stormwater rules in either watershed district for this project because there are no new or reconstructed impervious surfaces. City staff also performed a condition assessment on the existing storm sewer structures to evaluate the need for improvements in project areas. Since the roadway improvements are limited to pavement rehabilitation measures, it is not feasible to replace the existing storm sewer system. Therefore, a detailed drainage analysis was not performed on each project area. However, each neighborhood was evaluated for potential flooding during a major (100-year event) at emergency overflows (E.O.F.) for roadway low points and stormwater ponds to determine if there were any significant issues. A summary of the assessment is listed below: LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA There are four roadway low points within the project area. The E.O.F. for each low point appear to be functional and located an adequate distance away from adjacent properties. There are two stormwater ponds in the project area, each pond E.O.F. appears to be functional and located an adequate distance away from adjacent properties. Two open house comments were received for this portion of the project area. A property owner at 6531 Troendel Circle commented that they get ice buildup along the curb and gutter. This area will be further reviewed during the final design and construction for potential curb and gutter replacement to correct any localized drainage issues. A property owner at 861 Vineland Court commented about lack of existing drain tile. This area will be further reviewed during the final design for possible draintile installation. REDWING LANE AREA There are two roadway low points within the project area. The E.O.F. for the low point along Penamint Lane appears to flow north to pond LL 1-26 which means that it does not drain downstream. After visual inspection, the properties north of the low point along Penamint Lane appear at or below the E.O.F elevation. There are three stormwater ponds in the neighborhood. As mentioned above, the E.O.F. for pond LL 1-26 appears to be at or above the elevation of adjacent properties to the north. The E.O.F. for pond LL 1-9 appears close to the property at the southwest corner at Penamint Lane and Penamint Court. Field survey will be performed during the final design process to confirm E.O.F elevations in relation to adjacent properties. An open house comment was received from a property owner at 6840 Redwing Lane regarding areas of infiltration being wet and unusable in the spring. This is a typical 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 8 scenario for infiltration areas during the spring and therefore no improvements are planned to address this comment. CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA There are two roadway low points within the project area, both appear to be functional and located an adequate distance away from adjacent properties. There are no stormwater ponds in the neighborhood’s portion of the project area. An open house comment was received from a property owner at 6780 Brule Circle regarding backyard drainage from other homes running through their yard. The comment also noted that surface grading had already been performed in an attempt to correct this situation. Localized private property drainage issues are generally outside the scope of this project as any correction of this issue would likely require grading on private property. KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA There are three roadway low points within the project area. Two out of three E.O.F. appear to be functional and located an adequate distance away from adjacent properties. The E.O.F. at Kurvers Point Road (south of Basswood Circle) runs west towards adjacent properties. Field survey will be performed during the final design process to confirm E.O.F elevations in relation to adjacent properties. There are two stormwater ponds along Kurvers Point Road, each appear to have a functional E.O.F. An open house comment was received from the property owner at 21 Twin Maple Lane regarding various drainage issues. They expressed interested in installing drain tile along the curb adjacent to the property. This area will be further reviewed during final design. MARSH DRIVE AREA There are seven roadway low points within the project area. Five of the seven E.O.F. appear to be functional and located an adequate distance away from adjacent properties. The E.O.F. at Hidden Lane runs south towards adjacent properties. For the roadway low point along Hidden Court, the adjacent properties appear to be at or below the E.O.F. elevation. Field survey will be performed during the final design process to confirm E.O.F elevations in relation to adjacent properties. There are no stormwater ponds in this neighborhood’s portion of the project area. An open house comment was received from a property owner at 8030 Hidden Circle concerning poor pavement drainage. This drainage issue will be resolved with new pavement allowing better drainage of the cul-de-sac. TRAPPERS PASS AREA There are ten roadway low points within the project area. Nine of the roadway low points appear to be functional and located an adequate distance away from adjacent properties. The E.O.F. at Timber Hill Road low point flows south toward the adjacent properties along Timber Hill Road, further survey to confirm elevations is recommended. There are four stormwater ponds in the project area. The E.O.F. for pond SL 1-1 appears to be near adjacent properties along Piedmont Court. The E.O.F. for pond SL 2-1 appears to be near adjacent properties along Trappers Pass. Field survey will be performed during the final design process to confirm E.O.F elevations in relation to adjacent properties. No open house comments were received for this portion of the project. City staff also performed a condition assessment on the existing storm sewer structures to evaluate the need for improvements in project areas. The assessment completed by the City recommends a range of 9 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 improvements to storm sewer structures including ring adjustments, doghouse work, and complete structure replacement. There are no recommended storm sewer pipe improvements as part of the project. Some improvements may be made to some of the E.O.F. after field verifying elevations of the E.O.F. and adjacent properties. SANITARY SEWER The majority of existing sanitary sewer within the project areas consist of 8-inch PVC pipe. Approximately 2,000 feet of sanitary sewer located in the Choctaw Circle area consists of 8-inch ABS pipe. Televising was completed to identify the need for improvements to the sanitary sewer in the majority of areas. Based on a review of the televising information, no major improvements will be required as the sanitary sewer is in adequate condition in all areas except for portions of the sanitary sewer in the Choctaw Circle area that are identified for repair due to encrustation and infiltration. This section of pipe has been added to the project and is identified in Exhibit 4. Further analysis will be made during final design to determine the appropriate rehabilitation method. City staff has prepared a condition assessment of existing sanitary manholes in the project areas to determine the need for repairs, reconstruction, or replacement. Improvements include the replacement of rings and castings as needed, rebuilding structures that are in poor condition and addressing infiltration issues. The detailed cost estimate in Appendix C includes these improvements. The proposed sanitary sewer improvements are shown in Appendix A, Exhibit 4. WATERMAIN The existing water main located within the project areas consist of 6-inch, 8-inch and 12-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP). The Kurvers Point Road area and Redwing Lane area consists entirely of 6-inch DIP. The Marsh Drive area, Choctaw Circle area, and Lake Lucy Road area all consist of both 6-inch and 8-inch DIP. The Trappers Pass area mainly consists of 6-inch and 8-inch DIP; however, 12-inch DIP water main is also present. Based on coordination with City staff, it was determined that most of the improvements will be limited to replacing existing bolts on gate valves. The specific gate valves needing improvement have been evaluated and determined by City staff to be included in this project. The City evaluated the feasibility of removing a portion of water main in the Lake Lucy area where there is existing 6-inch water main connecting Lake Lucy Road and Western Drive. This section of water main is located outside of the public roadway right-of-way and is within the backyards of multiple properties as seen in Appendix A, Exhibit 4 (3 of 4). Eliminating this water main section would alleviate maintenance access issues in the future. A water main elimination analysis report was completed on February 24, 2020 by WSB. This report concluded that removing the existing 6-inch watermain between Lake Lucy Road and Western Drive would not cause any disruptions or issues with water pressure and available fire flows. The cost to remove this section of water main and relocate the existing water services is estimated at $75,000. This cost is currently not included in the project costs. Proposed water main improvements for each area are shown in Appendix A, Exhibit 4. 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 10 RIGHT-OF-W AY AND E ASEMENT REQUIREMENTS This feasibility study assumes that no additional right-of-way will be required for the construction of this project. In addition, it is assumed that any easements required for construction will be dedicated at no cost to the City. PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT An open house was held on February 11, 2020 to receive public input. City of Chanhassen and Kimley- Horn staff were present at the meeting to answer questions and provide information on the project. A total of 39 residents signed in and attended the meeting. At least one resident from each of the six areas was present. The main concern heard from property owners were related to drainage issues either within the road or on their private property. The scope of this project is limited to the public right-of-way and any improvements that can be made to improve drainage in the areas of concerned will be addressed during final design. Comment sheets submitted at the open house meeting are provided in Appendix B. ESTIMATED COSTS The estimated costs for 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project 20-05, are summarized below. The estimated project costs include a 5% construction cost contingency and an allowance for indirect costs. Detailed cost estimates are provided in Appendix C. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 422,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 235,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 243,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 434,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 648,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 1,897,000.00$ Roadway Subtotal 3,879,000.00$ STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 40,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 68,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 35,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 40,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 61,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 101,000.00$ Storm Sewer Subtotal 345,000.00$ SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY 11 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 C.P. 20-05 Total Area Improvements Amount Lake Lucy Road Area $515,000 Redwing Lane Area $353,000 Choctaw Circle Area $326,000 Kurvers Point Road Area $529,000 Marsh Drive Area $802,000 Trappers Pass Area $2,248,000 Indirect Costs 300,000 Total $5,073,000 METHOD OF FINANCING The improvements described in this report are proposed to be financed through multiple funding sources. Based on the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), the following is the preliminary financing plan for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project 20-05. 2020 Financing Source Amount General Funds $1,030,132 Surface Water Utility Fund $185,500 Sewer Utility Fund $192,500 Water Utility Fund $600,000 Special Assessments $1,551,868 Total $3,560,000 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 19,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 21,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 29,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 18,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 34,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 88,000.00$ Sanitary Sewer Subtotal 209,000.00$ WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 34,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 29,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 19,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 37,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 59,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 162,000.00$ Water main Subtotal 340,000.00$ INDIRECT COSTS 300,000.00$ TOTAL C.P. 20-05 IMPROVEMENTS COST 5,073,000.00$ 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 12 The project cost for all areas combined exceeds the City’s CIP budget for 2020. To reduce the project scope to fit within the City’s CIP budget, it is recommended that the roadway, storm sewer and utility improvements for the Trappers Pass, Choctaw Circle and Redwing Lane areas be constructed in 2020. The improvements to the remaining project areas could be included in a future project. Below is a summary of a financing plan for a project including the three areas identified above. 2020 Financing Source (Trappers Pass Area, Choctaw Circle Area, Redwing Lane Area) Amount General Funds $1,298,768 Surface Water Utility Fund $185,500 Sewer Utility Fund $192,500 Water Utility Fund $600,000 Special Assessments $950,232 Total $3,227,000 ESTIMATED A SSESSMENTS Special assessments are proposed to be levied against benefiting properties for the improvements included as part of this project. The rates have been established as a rehabilitation project based on the City of Chanhassen’s Assessment Practice updated November 2014. The proposed assessment method is described below. The benefitting properties will be assessed 40% of the roadway rehabilitation cost, including the full-depth reclamation, mill and overlay, bituminous pavement, curb and gutter replacement and drain tile. Only properties with direct driveway access to the roadways within each project area will be considered a benefitting property. Each area will have a separate assessment to reflect the improvements in those neighborhoods. The following is a summary of the proposed assessment rates for the street improvements included as part of this report. LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA Total Estimated Assessable Street Cost: $422,000 Assessable Units: 55 REU Estimated 100% Assessment Rate: $422,000/55 = $7,670 Estimated 40% Assessment Rate: (40%)*($7,670/REU) = $3,068 REDWING LANE AREA Total Estimated Assessable Street Cost: $235,000 Assessable Units: 48 REU Estimated 100% Assessment Rate: $235,000/48 = $4,900 Estimated 40% Assessment Rate: (40%)*($4,900/REU) = $1,960 CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA Total Estimated Assessable Street Cost: $243,000 Assessable Units: 45 REU 13 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 Estimated 100% Assessment Rate: $243,000/45 = $5,400 Estimated 40% Assessment Rate: (40%)*($5,400/REU) = $2,160 KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA Total Estimated Assessable Street Cost: $434,000 Assessable Units: 40 REU Estimated 100% Assessment Rate: $434,000/40 = $10,850 Estimated 40% Assessment Rate: (40%)*($10,850/REU) = $4,340 MARSH DRIVE AREA Total Estimated Assessable Street Cost: $648,000 Assessable Units: 111 REU Estimated 100% Assessment Rate: $648,000/111 = $5,840 Estimated 40% Assessment Rate: (40%)*($5,840/REU) = $2,336 TRAPPERS PASS AREA Total Estimated Assessable Street Cost: $1,897,000 Assessable Units: 249 REU Estimated 100% Assessment Rate: $1,897,000/249 = $7,620 Estimated 40% Assessment Rate: (40%)*($7,650/REU) = $3,048 The individual assessments range from $1,960 to $4,340 per property. The rate is affected by the type of roadway rehabilitation method recommended and the number of properties in the area. The total assessments to be levied against benefitting properties for the entire programmed improvements are $1,551,868. The amount to be levied against benefitting properties for the 2020 budgeted improvements are $950,232. A preliminary assessment roll is provided in Appendix D detailing the proposed assessments by individual property owner for each area. A map of these properties is shown in Appendix A, Exhibit 5. A special assessment hearing would be required to levy assessments if the project is ordered by the City Council. At this hearing, the Council would determine the amounts of the assessment based on actual construction costs and interest rate to be charged. The assessments would be spread over 8 years. PROJECT SCHEDULE If the City Council chooses to accept this report, we recommend that the following project schedule be followed: City Council Receive Final Feasibility Report Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specs Call Public Hearing April 13, 2020 Public Hearing April 27, 2020 Council Approves Plans and Specs May 25, 2020 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 14 Authorize Advertisement for Bids Bid Opening June 19, 2020 Neighborhood Meeting June 30, 2020 Assessment Hearing & Council Awards Contract July 13, 2020 Begin Construction Late July 2020 Substantial Construction Complete November 2020 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon the analysis completed as part of this report, the proposed 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project 20-05, are feasible, necessary, and cost effective, and would benefit the properties in the project area and the City of Chanhassen. We recommend the following: A. The City Council accepts this feasibility report and authorizes preparation of plans and specifications and calling of a public hearing for improvements to the Trappers Pass, Choctaw Circle and Redwing Lane areas. APPENDIX A EXHIBITS LAKE LUCY RD. AREA CHOCTAW CIR. AREA KURVERS POINT RD. AREA MARSH DR. AREA REDWING LN. AREA TRAPPERS PASS AREA PROJECT LOCATION MAP 2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 EXHIBIT 1 ℄℄K:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_TYP SECT.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:42am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 TYPICAL SECTION EXHIBIT 2 5 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION 2.5" MILL & OVERLAY FULL DEPTH MILL & OVERLAY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LEGENDK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_RDWY.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:42am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTHMARSH DRIVE AREA MAP ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 3 - 1 OF 4 MARSH DRIVE AREA 101 101 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION 2.5" MILL & OVERLAY FULL DEPTH MILL & OVERLAY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LEGENDK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_RDWY.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:43am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH CHOCTAW CIRCLE & KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA MAP ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 3 - 2 OF 4 KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION 2.5" MILL & OVERLAY FULL DEPTH MILL & OVERLAY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LEGENDK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_RDWY.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:44am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH LAKE LUCY ROAD & REDWING LANE AREA MAP ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 3 - 3 OF 4 LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA REDWING LANE AREA 101 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION 2.5" MILL & OVERLAY FULL DEPTH MILL & OVERLAY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LEGENDK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_RDWY.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:44am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH TRAPPERS PASS AREA MAP ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 3 - 4 OF 4 TRAPPERS PASS AREA 555 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS STORM SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS WATERMAIN GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_UTIL.dwg March 18, 2020 - 12:24pm2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTHMARSH DRIVE AREA MAP UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 4 - 1 OF 4 MARSH DRIVE AREA 28 GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTS 101101101 101101101 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS STORM SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS WATERMAIN GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_UTIL.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:48am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH CHOCTAW CIRCLE & KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA MAP UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 4 - 2 OF 4 KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA 9 GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTS 9 GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTS EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS STORM SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS WATERMAIN GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_UTIL.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:49am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH LAKE LUCY ROAD & REDWING LANE AREA MAP UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 4 - 3 OF 4 LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA REDWING LANE AREA 14 GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTS 16 GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTS 101101101 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS STORM SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS WATERMAIN GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_UTIL.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:51am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH TRAPPERS PASS AREA MAP UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 4 - 4 OF 4 TRAPPERS PASS AREA 77 GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTS 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 52 51 50 494847 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 373635343332313029 2827 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 112111110 109108107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 99 989796 95 94 93 9291 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 390 380 370 360 350 340 330 320 310 300 280 260 250 80208040806080808090810081208140 8150 81608170 8180 8191 8181 8161 8141 8121 8101 8091 8081 8061 8041 8021 8001 8110 8114 8116 8118 8124 8283 8263 8243 8223 8203 8193 8183 8173 8163 8153 8143 8133 8123 8113 8103 331 321 311 8091 80818071 8061 8051 8040 8030 8020 8010 8000 271 261 80808090 8100 811081208130 8140 8150 8160 8170 8180 8190 310 320 330340341 331 321 311 301 8128 8130 8132 8134 8136 8138 8140 8139 8137 8135 8133 8131 8129 8127 8123 8121 8117 8113 5 PUBLIC SINGLE-FAMILY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAYK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_ASSESSMENT.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:51am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTHMARSH DRIVE AREA MAP PROPOSED ASSESSMENT MAP EXHIBIT 5 - 1 OF 4 MARSH DRIVE AREA 101 113114115 116 117 118 119 120 121122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132133134135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 722172317241 7261 7271 71 51 41 21 20 40 60 40 30 20 2131 7361 7371 7381 73807370 7360 7350 7340 7330 7320 7310 7290 7280 7240 7220 7200 7160 7150 7140 7130 7120 7131 7151 A B 7251 101 101 153 153 154 154 157158159160161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173174175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 155156 197 196 195 194 193 192 191 190189 188 187 186 6850 15 31517191101105 111 115 121 125 131 135 141 145 151 155 161 160 154 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 70 50 30 6811 6805 6801 6791 6781 6771 6761 67516750 6760 6770 6780 6790 6800 101 PUBLIC SINGLE-FAMILY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAYK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_ASSESSMENT.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:52am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH CHOCTAW CIRCLE & KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA MAP PROPOSED ASSESSMENT MAP EXHIBIT 5 - 2 OF 4 KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231232 233 234235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 199 198 6770 6781 6790 6800 6820 6840 6850 6870 6880 6890 6900 6910 6920 6921 6911 6901 6891 6881 6871 6841 6840 6821 6801 6791 6781 6770 6780 6790 6800 6820 6830 6771 6781 960 950 940 930 920 910 902 900 901 911 921 931 941 951 961 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 259 257 258 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 285284283 282 281 280 279 278 277 276 275 274 273 272 271 270 298 299 246 247 297 296 295 294 293 292 291 289288 290 287 286 6500 6520 6540 6560 6580 6590 6581 6561 6541 6531 6501 6481 6491 6493 64951 6501 6511 900 880 860 840 820 861 881 901921 6561 6581 920940960980 6580 6560 6540 6520 6500 10001020104010601080 1100 6581 1121 1101 1081 1061 1041 1021 1001 981 961 941 921 6641 299A PUBLIC SINGLE-FAMILY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAYK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_ASSESSMENT.dwg March 18, 2020 - 5:30pm2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH LAKE LUCY ROAD & REDWING LANE AREA MAP PROPOSED ASSESSMENT MAP EXHIBIT 5 - 3 OF 4 LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA REDWING LANE AREA 101 302303304305 306 307 308 309 310 311312 318 319 320 321322 323 324 325 326327 328 329 330331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404405406407 408 409 410 411 416 415 414413412 427 426425 424 417418 419 420 421422423 434 435 436437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444445 428 429 430431 432 433 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 473474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491468 469 470471472 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 501 500 502 516 517 503 515 504 514 505506 507 508 509 510 511 513 512 541 518 540 519 539 520521 522 523 524 525526 527528529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 6300 639063806370 6360201 211 221 231 241251261 271 6331 6341 6351 64216420 6410 6355 6357 6359 6363 6365 6367 63696371 6373 6375 6377 6379 6381 6383 6385 6387 6389 6391 6393 6395 6397 6399 6401 6403 6405 6407 6409 6411 6300 6306 6310 6320 6330 6340 6350 6368 6366 6341 6331 6321 6311 6301 6408 501 491 481 461 431 421 401 381 361 341 321 301 291 251 6260 6240 6220 6210 6201 6221 6241 6261 241 221 210 6281 6291 6301 6311 6331 6351 6371 6391 6340 6232 6230 6228 6226 6224 6222 6220 6218 6216 6214 185183 181 180 170 160 150 6208 6206 6204 6202 6200 98 96 94 92 90 88 86 87 89 91939597 96 94 92 90 88 91 93 95 97 96 94 92 90 88 919395 97 98 96 92 90 88 86 84 82 81 83 85 87899193 95 97 99 101 100110 120 130 121 111 6300 101 6310 6320 6225 6223 6221 6219 6217 6215 6213 6211 6209 6207 6205 6203 6201 6199 431 6300 6310 6311 6321 500 480 460 430 411 6320 410 420 430 6358 6356 6354 6352 6350 6340 6330 6320 6310 6300 3003406301 6311 6321 63316340 6330 290 6301 6311 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 6330 201 221241 260 280 6300 250 6362 6370 301 300310 331 301 291 300 313 314 315 316 317 446447448449 450451 542 543544 545 546 547 452 548 101 PUBLIC SINGLE-FAMILY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAYK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_ASSESSMENT.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:53am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH TRAPPERS PASS AREA MAP PROPOSED ASSESSMENT MAP EXHIBIT 5 - 4 OF 4 TRAPPERS PASS AREA APPENDIX B PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE INFORMATION APPENDIX C DETAILED COST ESTIMATES FIGURE 1A CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) ESTIMATED COSTS SUMMARY ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 422,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 235,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 243,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 434,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 648,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 1,897,000.00$ Roadway Subtotal 3,879,000.00$ STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 40,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 68,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 35,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 40,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 61,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 101,000.00$ Storm Sewer Subtotal 345,000.00$ SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 19,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 21,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 29,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 18,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 34,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 88,000.00$ Sanitary Sewer Subtotal 209,000.00$ WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 34,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 29,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 19,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 37,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 59,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 162,000.00$ Water main Subtotal 340,000.00$ INDIRECT COSTS 300,000.00$ TOTAL C.P. 20-05 IMPROVEMENTS COST 5,073,000.00$ FIGURE 1B CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) ESTIMATED COSTS: LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL LAKE LUCY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS = $515,000 Item No.Item Description Unit Total Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 20,000.00$20,000.00$ 2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB - SPOT CURB REPLACEMENT LIN FT 700 5.00$3,500.00$ 3 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 14000 4.00$56,000.00$ 4 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 1500 75.00$112,500.00$ 5 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 1500 80.00$120,000.00$ 6 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - SPOT CURB LIN FT 700 25.00$17,500.00$ 7 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$5,000.00$ 8 TURF ESTABLISHMENT - SOD SQ YD 1300 8.00$10,400.00$ 9 TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 300 60.00$18,000.00$ 10 EROSION CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 11 SIGNING / STRIPING LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$5,000.00$ 12 4" SUBSURFACE DRAINTILE LIN FT 1000 20.00$20,000.00$ 13 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 9 500.00$4,500.00$ Subtotal 402,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 20,000.00$ Total Street Improvements Cost 422,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 REMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 2 500.00$1,000.00$ 2 STORM SEWER MANHOLE / CATCH BASIN EACH 2 4,000.00$8,000.00$ 3 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE EACH 14 1,500.00$21,000.00$ 4 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE-SPECIAL EACH 4 1,500.00$6,000.00$ 5 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 4 500.00$2,000.00$ Subtotal 38,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 2,000.00$ Total Storm Sewer Improvements Cost 40,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 14 500.00$7,000.00$ 2 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 2 1,500.00$3,000.00$ 3 26" SANITARY SEWER LID EACH 14 250.00$3,500.00$ 4 GROUT MANHOLE EACH 6 700.00$4,200.00$ Subtotal 18,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 1,000.00$ Total Sanitary Sewer Improvements Cost 19,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENT EACH 16 2,000.00$32,000.00$ Subtotal 32,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 2,000.00$ Total Watermain Improvements Cost 34,000.00$ FIGURE 1C CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) ESTIMATED COSTS: REDWING LANE AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL REDWING LANE IMPROVEMENTS = $353,000 Item No.Item Description Unit Total Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB - SPOT CURB REPLACEMENT LIN FT 700 5.00$3,500.00$ 3 MILL BITUMINOUS (2.5")SQ YD 8800 4.00$35,200.00$ 4 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2.5")TON 1400 80.00$112,000.00$ 5 BITUMINOUS REMOVAL / PATCHING SQ YD 600 30.00$18,000.00$ 6 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - SPOT CURB LIN FT 600 25.00$15,000.00$ 7 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$5,000.00$ 8 TURF ESTABLISHMENT - SOD SQ YD 600 8.00$4,800.00$ 9 TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 100 60.00$6,000.00$ 10 EROSION CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 11 4" SUBSURFACE DRAINTILE LIN FT 200 20.00$4,000.00$ 12 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 1 500.00$500.00$ Subtotal 224,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 11,000.00$ Total Street Improvements Cost 235,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 REMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 10 500.00$5,000.00$ 2 STORM SEWER MANHOLE / CATCH BASIN EACH 10 4,000.00$40,000.00$ 3 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE EACH 5 1,500.00$7,500.00$ 4 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE-SPECIAL EACH 1 1,500.00$1,500.00$ 5 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 21 500.00$10,500.00$ Subtotal 65,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 3,000.00$ Total Storm Sewer Improvements Cost 68,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 13 500.00$6,500.00$ 2 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 3 1,500.00$4,500.00$ 3 26" SANITARY SEWER LID EACH 13 250.00$3,250.00$ 4 GROUT MANHOLE EACH 8 700.00$5,600.00$ Subtotal 20,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 1,000.00$ Total Sanitary Sewer Improvements Cost 21,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENT EACH 14 2,000.00$28,000.00$ Subtotal 28,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 1,000.00$ Total Watermain Improvements Cost 29,000.00$ FIGURE 1D CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) ESTIMATED COSTS: CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL CHOCTAW CIRCLE IMPROVEMENTS = $326,000 Item No.Item Description Unit Total Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB - SPOT CURB REPLACEMENT LIN FT 600 5.00$3,000.00$ 3 MILL BITUMINOUS (2.5")SQ YD 6400 4.00$25,600.00$ 4 MILL BITUMINOUS (FULL DEPTH)SQ YD 1500 4.00$6,000.00$ 5 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2.5" - 4")TON 1400 80.00$112,000.00$ 6 BITUMINOUS REMOVAL / PATCHING SQ YD 600 30.00$18,000.00$ 7 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - SPOT CURB LIN FT 600 25.00$15,000.00$ 8 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$5,000.00$ 9 TURF ESTABLISHMENT - SOD SQ YD 800 8.00$6,400.00$ 10 TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 150 60.00$9,000.00$ 11 EROSION CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 12 4" SUBSURFACE DRAINTILE LIN FT 500 20.00$10,000.00$ 13 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 2 500.00$1,000.00$ Subtotal 231,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 12,000.00$ Total Street Improvements Cost 243,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 REMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 5 500.00$2,500.00$ 2 STORM SEWER MANHOLE / CATCH BASIN EACH 4 4,000.00$16,000.00$ 3 18" FLARED END SECTION EACH 1 5,000.00$5,000.00$ 4 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE EACH 2 1,500.00$3,000.00$ 5 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE-SPECIAL EACH 1 1,500.00$1,500.00$ 6 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 9 500.00$4,500.00$ Subtotal 33,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 2,000.00$ Total Storm Sewer Improvements Cost 35,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 7 500.00$3,500.00$ 2 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 7 1,500.00$10,500.00$ 3 26" SANITARY SEWER LID EACH 7 250.00$1,750.00$ 4 SANITARY SEWER PIPE REHABILITATION LIN FT 160 75.00$12,000.00$ Subtotal 28,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 1,000.00$ Total Sanitary Sewer Improvements Cost 29,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENT EACH 9 2,000.00$18,000.00$ Subtotal 18,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 1,000.00$ Total Watermain Improvements Cost 19,000.00$ FIGURE 1E CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) ESTIMATED COSTS: KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL KURVERS POINT ROAD IMPROVEMENTS = $529,000 Item No.Item Description Unit Total Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 20,000.00$20,000.00$ 2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB - SPOT CURB REPLACEMENT LIN FT 800 5.00$4,000.00$ 3 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 13500 4.00$54,000.00$ 4 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 1600 75.00$120,000.00$ 5 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 1600 80.00$128,000.00$ 6 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - SPOT CURB LIN FT 800 25.00$20,000.00$ 7 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$5,000.00$ 8 TURF ESTABLISHMENT - SOD SQ YD 1400 8.00$11,200.00$ 9 TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 250 60.00$15,000.00$ 10 EROSION CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 11 4" SUBSURFACE DRAINTILE LIN FT 1200 20.00$24,000.00$ 12 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 3 500.00$1,500.00$ Subtotal 413,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 21,000.00$ Total Street Improvements Cost 434,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 REMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 4 500.00$2,000.00$ 2 STORM SEWER MANHOLE / CATCH BASIN EACH 4 4,000.00$16,000.00$ 3 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE EACH 9 1,500.00$13,500.00$ 4 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 13 500.00$6,500.00$ Subtotal 38,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 2,000.00$ Total Storm Sewer Improvements Cost 40,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 20 500.00$10,000.00$ 2 26" SANITARY SEWER LID EACH 20 250.00$5,000.00$ 3 GROUT MANHOLE EACH 3 700.00$2,100.00$ Subtotal 17,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 1,000.00$ Total Sanitary Sewer Improvements Cost 18,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 2 500.00$1,000.00$ 2 HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE EACH 2 8,000.00$16,000.00$ 3 VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENT EACH 9 2,000.00$18,000.00$ Subtotal 35,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 2,000.00$ Total Watermain Improvements Cost 37,000.00$ FIGURE 1F CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) ESTIMATED COSTS: MARSH DRIVE AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL MARSH DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS = $802,000 Item No.Item Description Unit Total Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 30,000.00$30,000.00$ 2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB - SPOT CURB REPLACEMENT LIN FT 1300 5.00$6,500.00$ 3 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 21000 4.00$84,000.00$ 4 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 2500 75.00$187,500.00$ 5 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 2500 80.00$200,000.00$ 6 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - SPOT CURB LIN FT 1300 25.00$32,500.00$ 7 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$5,000.00$ 8 TURF ESTABLISHMENT - SOD SQ YD 1800 8.00$14,400.00$ 9 TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 350 60.00$21,000.00$ 10 EROSION CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 11 4" SUBSURFACE DRAINTILE LIN FT 1200 20.00$24,000.00$ 12 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 4 500.00$2,000.00$ Subtotal 617,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 31,000.00$ Total Street Improvements Cost 648,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 REMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 5 500.00$2,500.00$ 2 STORM SEWER MANHOLE / CATCH BASIN EACH 5 4,000.00$20,000.00$ 3 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE EACH 14 1,500.00$21,000.00$ 4 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE-SPECIAL EACH 6 1,500.00$9,000.00$ 5 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 10 500.00$5,000.00$ Subtotal 58,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 3,000.00$ Total Storm Sewer Improvements Cost 61,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 31 500.00$15,500.00$ 2 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 1 1,500.00$1,500.00$ 3 26" SANITARY SEWER LID EACH 31 250.00$7,750.00$ 4 GROUT MANHOLE EACH 10 700.00$7,000.00$ Subtotal 32,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 2,000.00$ Total Sanitary Sewer Improvements Cost 34,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENT EACH 28 2,000.00$56,000.00$ Subtotal 56,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 3,000.00$ Total Watermain Improvements Cost 59,000.00$ FIGURE 1G CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) ESTIMATED COSTS: TRAPPERS PASS AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL TRAPPERS PASS IMPROVEMENTS = $2,248,000 Item No.Item Description Unit Total Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 110,000.00$110,000.00$ 2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB - SPOT CURB REPLACEMENT LIN FT 2000 5.00$10,000.00$ 3 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 64000 4.00$256,000.00$ 4 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 7800 75.00$585,000.00$ 5 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 7800 80.00$624,000.00$ 6 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - SPOT CURB LIN FT 2000 25.00$50,000.00$ 7 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 8 TURF ESTABLISHMENT - SOD SQ YD 3500 8.00$28,000.00$ 9 TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 700 60.00$42,000.00$ 10 EROSION CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 25,000.00$25,000.00$ 11 4" SUBSURFACE DRAINTILE LIN FT 3100 20.00$62,000.00$ 12 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 10 500.00$5,000.00$ Subtotal 1,807,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 90,000.00$ Total Street Improvements Cost 1,897,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 REMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 17 500.00$8,500.00$ 2 STORM SEWER MANHOLE / CATCH BASIN EACH 17 4,000.00$68,000.00$ 3 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE EACH 5 1,500.00$7,500.00$ 4 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE-SPECIAL EACH 1 1,500.00$1,500.00$ 5 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 20 500.00$10,000.00$ Subtotal 96,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 5,000.00$ Total Storm Sewer Improvements Cost 101,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 88 500.00$44,000.00$ 2 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 2 1,500.00$3,000.00$ 3 26" SANITARY SEWER LID EACH 88 250.00$22,000.00$ 4 GROUT MANHOLE EACH 22 700.00$15,400.00$ Subtotal 84,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 4,000.00$ Total Sanitary Sewer Improvements Cost 88,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENT EACH 77 2,000.00$154,000.00$ Subtotal 154,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 8,000.00$ Total Watermain Improvements Cost 162,000.00$ APPENDIX D PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 648,000.00$ 5,840.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 1 253450130 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & DEBRA PRIGGE 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 2 253450120 SINGLE-FAMILY BISRAT & DENISE ALEMAYEHU 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 3 253450110 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & GAIL DIEDRICK 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 4 253450100 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & CAROL UDSTUEN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 5 253450090 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & JULIE NESSLY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 6 253450080 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW PATTEE & DONNA SPINELLI 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 7 253450070 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID LYONS & JULIE TENHOFF-LYONS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 8 253450060 SINGLE-FAMILY KAREN OLSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 9 253450050 SINGLE-FAMILY CORY & AMY MILLER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 10 253450040 SINGLE-FAMILY LEE & MARY KAUFMAN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 11 253450030 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL ALBERTS & JENNIFER KOTTKE-ALBERTS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 12 253450020 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & REBECCA BUSACKER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 13 253450010 SINGLE-FAMILY KUE & CAROL VANG 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 14 253450140 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & DENISE MCALPIN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 $ 2,336.00 15 253450150 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & PAMELA MURPHY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 $ 2,336.00 16 253450160 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & LANA BERGO 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 17 253450170 SINGLE-FAMILY STANLEY H LESTER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 18 253450180 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SONJA DENOW 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 19 253450190 SINGLE-FAMILY JOANNE MARIE SOUSA 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 20 253450200 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHRYN LESLIE RASMUSSEN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 21 253450210 SINGLE-FAMILY GREGORY & KAREN GMITERKO 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 22 253450220 SINGLE-FAMILY SUSAN ROSE SULLIVAN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 23 253450230 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES RADTKE 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 24 253450240 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & JEANNE HUNT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 25 253450250 SINGLE-FAMILY VENKATESH PARAMESHWARAN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 26 253450260 SINGLE-FAMILY LAMONTE & JANICE EASTVOLD 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 27 253450270 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHAN & DENISE LEBENS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 28 253450280 SINGLE-FAMILY DALE & ZOLA KLABUNDE 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 29 253450290 SINGLE-FAMILY DANA & EMILY SANDS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 30 253450300 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ADELL GLASER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 31 253450310 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & LINDA GIORDANO 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 32 253450320 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN TODD BLACK 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 33 253450330 SINGLE-FAMILY KAREN KLINSING 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 34 253450340 SINGLE-FAMILY NGUYEN & BINH NGU CHAU 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 35 253450350 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & AMBER WAHL 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 36 253450360 SINGLE-FAMILY BRAIN & JEAN STECKLING 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 37 253450370 SINGLE-FAMILY EDWARD & HANNAH RAUPP 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 38 253450380 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & MICHELLE HAIK 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 39 253450390 SINGLE-FAMILY JESSICA LOVERING 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 40 253450400 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK LAKOSKY & JULIE STEVENSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 41 253450410 SINGLE-FAMILY ANDREW & EMMA TURNER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 42 253450420 SINGLE-FAMILY LAUREN & SHAUNA KOPP 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 43 253450430 SINGLE-FAMILY SHANNON MCCLARD & SHERRIE PETERSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 44 253450440 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SUSAN BLAKE 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 45 253450450 SINGLE-FAMILY EVANGELINE CUBALCHINI 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 46 253450460 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK ASHWELL 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 47 253450470 SINGLE-FAMILY CLARISSA & FRANK TERSCHAN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 48 253450480 SINGLE-FAMILY JOEL MATTHEWS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 49 253450490 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & WHITNEY GOHAM 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 50 253450500 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & CARLA THOMPSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 51 253450510 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & JODI SCHLEYER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 52 253450520 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & DEBORAH SEMKE 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 53 253450530 SINGLE-FAMILY BRANDON & JENNIFER HOUGHHAM 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 54 253450540 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & PRUDENCE BUSCH 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 55 253450550 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & ELIZABETH 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 56 253450560 SINGLE-FAMILY MARY STUTELBERG 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 57 253450570 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON& BRANDI STENSOS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 58 253450580 SINGLE-FAMILY SCOTT & CATHERINE GALLOWAY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 59 253450590 SINGLE-FAMILY RANDY & KRISTINE IMKER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 60 253450600 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD HLADKY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 61 253450610 SINGLE-FAMILY JEREMY & DANA STETZER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 62 253450620 SINGLE-FAMILY BRUCE & JOYCE BOJE 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 63 253450630 SINGLE-FAMILY TERENCE & JOAN DEMETER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 64 253450640 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & GERALYNN COLOSEY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 65 253450650 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SUSAN THORUD 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 66 253450660 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & MICHELLE AAS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 67 253450670 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBER & KATHLEEN OLMSTED 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 68 253450680 SINGLE-FAMILY ANTHONY & JANET MERTES 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 69 253450690 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & CHERYL KINSELLA 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 70 253450700 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK RAY SCHUMACHER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 71 253450710 SINGLE-FAMILY CURTIS MATTERN & STACEY SEIM 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 72 251820520 SINGLE-FAMILY PETER & JESSICA LAMBRECHT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 73 NOT USED 74 251820720 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN & HALLIE TIFFANY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 75 253450720 SINGLE-FAMILY NICKMARK LLC 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 76 253450730 SINGLE-FAMILY BRENDA JANE WALSH 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 77 253450740 SINGLE-FAMILY BLAKE SPILLERS & JENNIFER GRAHAM-SPILLERS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 78 253451090 SINGLE-FAMILY KRISSY & PETER DOHERTY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 79 253451080 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & ROSA SEIM 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 80 253451070 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT MYERS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 81 253451060 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & SHERI LEWIS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 82 253451050 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & RENE LUCAS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 83 253451040 SINGLE-FAMILY JAY & REBECCA LEGLER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 84 253451030 SINGLE-FAMILY MARIE & DEAN SUND 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 85 253451022 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & KATHRYNE SLAVICS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - MARSH DRIVE AREA Roadway Assessment Total Estimated Roadway Cost 648,000.00$ 5,840.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - MARSH DRIVE AREA Roadway Assessment Total Estimated Roadway Cost 86 253451010 SINGLE-FAMILY JON & SARAH HANSEN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 87 253451000 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL BOGDEN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 88 253450990 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & LAURIE LANGLEY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 89 253450980 SINGLE-FAMILY PHILIP & LUCILLE REHM 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 90 253450970 SINGLE-FAMILY TERENCE & PEI LING JAMISON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 91 253450960 SINGLE-FAMILY DANLD WILDMAN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 92 253450950 SINGLE-FAMILY GENE & KIM HEIKKINEN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 93 253450940 SINGLE-FAMILY AMY WESLEY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 94 253450930 SINGLE-FAMILY TYLER & JANE PETERSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 95 253450920 SINGLE-FAMILY LOREN & KATHRYN SPENLER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 96 253450910 SINGLE-FAMILY JAN WESTGAARD 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 97 253450900 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & PATRICIA HAMBLIN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 98 253450890 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & KARIN OLSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 99 253450880 SINGLE-FAMILY LUKE & KIMBERLY NELSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 100 253450870 SINGLE-FAMILY ANGELA BIALCZYK 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 101 253450860 SINGLE-FAMILY DONOVAN LEE ISDAHL 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 102 253450850 SINGLE-FAMILY CHERYL FELTON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 103 253450840 SINGLE-FAMILY KEITH & DIANA ANDERSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 104 253450830 SINGLE-FAMILY DARRIN & MICHELLE ARLT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 105 253450820 SINGLE-FAMILY BRUCE & CYNTHIA MARENGO 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 106 253450810 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & SANDRA BERGGREN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 107 253450800 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & RITA KLAUDA 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 108 253450790 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & STEPHANIE KLEIN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 109 253450780 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPH LESER & COLLEEN CANNON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 110 253450770 SINGLE-FAMILY TREVOR & JULIE MAASSEN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 111 253450760 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JENNIFER HELMICK 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 112 253450750 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & LOIS SAVARD 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 111 TOTAL 259,296.00$Assessment Totals 434,000.00$ 10,850.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT A 253920270 H.O.A.KURVERS POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 0 40% $ --$ B 253920320 H.O.A.KURVERS POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 0 40% $ --$ 113 253920260 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & LAURANNA GODFREY 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 114 253920250 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES HENRICK 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 115 253920240 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW JENSEN & JENNIFER TIBODEAU-JOHNSON 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 116 253920230 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & LISA FARLAND 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 117 253920220 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHLEEN GROVER 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 118 253920210 SINGLE-FAMILY KARMIN & STEVEN CORKERY 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 119 253920200 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON & JODI RADEL 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 120 253920190 SINGLE-FAMILY TERENCE J MCGROTTY ETAL 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 121 253920180 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD ANTON & DIANNE DEERING 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 122 253920170 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & ELIZABETH HARRINGTON 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 123 253920160 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON & CHRISTINE OSTBYE 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 124 253920150 SINGLE-FAMILY CRAIG & SANDRA CARLSON 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 125 253930140 SINGLE-FAMILY BRADLEY & KATHLEEN VELDBOOM 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 126 253930130 SINGLE-FAMILY CAMERON & ERIN REINHART 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 127 253930120 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY & JODIE SIEMS 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 128 253930110 SINGLE-FAMILY TANYA GLATTLY 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 129 253930100 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & DEBORAH WOLFF 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 130 253930090 SINGLE-FAMILY FRANK & LISA MENDEZ 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 131 253930080 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK ENGASSER 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 132 253930070 SINGLE-FAMILY KURT & DEANA FOSSEY 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 133 253930060 SINGLE-FAMILY SCOTT JOHNSON 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 134 253930050 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & NANCY KOCH 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 135 253930040 SINGLE-FAMILY SUSAN APPLEGATE 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 136 253930030 SINGLE-FAMILY BRAIN & KRISTEN APPLEGATE 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 137 253930020 SINGLE-FAMILY JAY ANTHONY WARMUTH 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 138 253930010 SINGLE-FAMILY ALFRED & SUSAN HENDERSON 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 139 253920010 SINGLE-FAMILY MOHAMMED NASHAWATY & HAZAR ALNAHASS 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 140 253920020 SINGLE-FAMILY BROOKE & KJIRSTEN NYSTROM 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 141 253920030 SINGLE-FAMILY DANNY & BRENDA VATLAND 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 142 253920040 SINGLE-FAMILY COREY & AMY FRANKLIN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 143 253920050 SINGLE-FAMILY JACQUELINE KURVERS 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 144 253920060 SINGLE-FAMILY FRANKLIN & MYRNA KURVERS 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 145 253920130 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON & DANIELLE HUTTNER 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 146 253920140 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JODI OSTENDORF 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 147 253920070 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN MESTITZ & PEGGY NAAS 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 148 256950010 SINGLE-FAMILY ANDREW & JINNY SENN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 149 256950020 SINGLE-FAMILY CRAIG & LAURIE BURFEIND 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 150 253920100 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & SOPHIE CHABIN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 151 253920110 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & SOPHIE CHABIN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 152 253920120 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & NARTHLADA FREEMAN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 40 TOTAL 173,600.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Roadway Assessment Assessment Totals Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA 243,000.00$ 5,400.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 153 250012000 / 254200451 SINGLE-FAMILY SCOTT & JANET WOLTER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 154 254200450 / 254200010 SINGLE-FAMILY RICK & ROBERTA MURRAY 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 155 254200020 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID DEAN GUGGEMOS 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 156 254200030 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & JESSICA ABRAMS 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 157 254200040 SINGLE-FAMILY ELIZABETH & JEFFREY WELTER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 158 254200050 SINGLE-FAMILY ALAN & BRENDA LEM 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 159 254200060 SINGLE-FAMILY GARY WELCH 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 160 254200070 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & LENORE DRYKE 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 161 254200080 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & BARBARA HECTORNE 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 162 254200090 SINGLE-FAMILY CHARLES & PAULA HALLAU 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 163 254200440 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & STACEY HORVICK 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 164 254200430 SINGLE-FAMILY KENTON & SHARON TOLLBERG 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 165 254200420 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSHUA & JENNIFER REITAN 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 166 254200410 SINGLE-FAMILY ALLISTER TUDOR & DENISE JONES 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 167 254200400 SINGLE-FAMILY HARVEY & CATHERINE GREEN 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 168 254200390 SINGLE-FAMILY ANDREW BALAZS & KRISTEN FRAZER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 169 254200380 SINGLE-FAMILY LAURA METTNER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 170 254200370 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRIS & JANA CASTILLON 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 171 254200360 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH EDWARD ALEXANDER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 172 254200350 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & JESSICA ENGLUND 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 173 254200340 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY & CAROL KAHNKE 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 174 254200330 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT HOFFNER & KAREN HUGHES-HOFFNER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 175 254200320 SINGLE-FAMILY NEIL LIBSON & SUSAN DREVES 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 176 2545200310 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTIANE PEREIRA DOLABELLA DUARTE 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 177 2540200300 SINGLE-FAMILY REBECCA & MARC HEAGNEY 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 178 254200290 SINGLE-FAMILY LANCE & SUSAN STREFF 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 179 254200280 SINGLE-FAMILY JESSICA & JOSHUA FRIE 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 180 254200270 SINGLE-FAMILY WAYNE & CATHY DIONNE 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 181 254200260 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN & KIIRSTEN RAKERS 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 182 254200250 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS LAUBY & MARY BURKHARDT 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 183 254200240 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & AMBER BATTIN 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 184 254200230 SINGLE-FAMILY NICHOLAS & SANDRA GASSMAN 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 185 254200220 SINGLE-FAMILY JAIMIE LAVANGER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 186 254200210 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & ANN RHODES 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 187 254200200 SINGLE-FAMILY COLLEEN & STEPHEN FRANKWITZ 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 188 254200190 SINGLE-FAMILY PATRICK NOLAN & CARLA HANSON-NOLAN 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 189 254200180 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & CHARLENE BOROTZ 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 190 254200170 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER BORNS 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 191 254200160 SINGLE-FAMILY LEAH THOMAS & CHRISTINE SMITH 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 192 254200150 SINGLE-FAMILY CARL & MELISSA ECKER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 193 254200140 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & JESSICA FRIBERG 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 194 254200130 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & GLENDA SPEECE 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 195 254200120 SINGLE-FAMILY CHARLES SIMON & ANGELA SCHLENDER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 196 254200110 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & STACY MCNABB 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 197 254200100 SINGLE-FAMILY CYNTHIA WALSTON 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 45 TOTAL 97,200.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Roadway Assessment Assessment Totals Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA 235,000.00$ 4,900.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 198 252000510 SINGLE-FAMILY RANY & KRISTIN BAANA 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 199 252000520 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHANIEL HERMAN & LORI BESSINGER 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 200 252000530 SINGLE-FAMILY SANDRA WALTON 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 201 252000540 SINGLE-FAMILY LAURA BEERS & BLAKE FREESE 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 202 252000550 SINGLE-FAMILY DIRK KREMERS 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 203 252000560 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN SMITH & ELIZABETH REASON 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 204 252000570 SINGLE-FAMILY JACK & ANN DOWNEY 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 205 252000580 SINGLE-FAMILY GLENN & LISA KAUFMANN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 206 252000590 SINGLE-FAMILY BETH FLOTTMEIER 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 207 252000600 SINGLE-FAMILY LAUREL YOUNG 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 208 252000610 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN WOOLCOTT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 209 252000620 SINGLE-FAMILY SHELLEY MEHL 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 210 252000630 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEC YOUNG & ELIZABETH MATZEK 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 211 252000250 SINGLE-FAMILY YAN KENT & ANN SEVERSON 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 212 252000240 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT DEHN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 213 252000230 SINGLE-FAMILY MITCHELL& KATHLEEN FREIDERICH 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 214 252200220 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ASHLEY SELLERS 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 215 252000210 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & SUSANN JOHNSON 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 216 252000200 SINGLE-FAMILY JERRY & CINDRA BAHMILLER 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 217 252000190 SINGLE-FAMILY CASEY & KEVIN KURTT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 218 252000180 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEY BRODAHL & TAMARA BRUESS 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 219 252000170 SINGLE-FAMILY JOEY & PATRICIA FLOE 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 220 252000160 SINGLE-FAMILY DEAN & LAURA BIRD 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 221 252000150 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & DEBRA LARSON 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 222 252000140 SINGLE-FAMILY ELEANOR & DIRK DOBBINS 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 223 252000130 SINGLE-FAMILY NANCY JEAN NORTH 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 224 252000120 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHRYN PETRICK 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 225 252000110 SINGLE-FAMILY BRYAN & CAROL MCGOVERN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 226 252000100 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & AMY DEBLOCK 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 227 252000090 SINGLE-FAMILY LEROY & WANDA BITELER 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 228 252000080 SINGLE-FAMILY NICHOLAS JOHNSON & JENNIFER GLIDDEN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 229 252000070 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & TAMARA ENGESETHER 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 230 252000060 SINGLE-FAMILY ANNE & DANA MOSTAD 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 231 252000050 SINGLE-FAMILY BRENT BAUER 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 232 252000040 SINGLE-FAMILY KEITH & JAYNE MOODY 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 233 252000030 SINGLE-FAMILY RAY & MARY MIKKONEN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 234 252000020 SINGLE-FAMILY FOURCO LLC 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 235 252000360 SINGLE-FAMILY TIMOTHY & CHARLOTTE SAVALOJA 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 236 252000370 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHAN SERVEY & TAYLOR WALDIN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 237 252000380 SINGLE-FAMILY JOEL & ALEXIA SUITER 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 238 252000390 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & MELISSA BROICH 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 239 252000400 SINGLE-FAMILY BRUCE SCHULTZ 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 240 252000410 SINGLE-FAMILY HEIDI & MICHAEL COLGAN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 241 252000420 SINGLE-FAMILY IH2 PROPERTY BORROWER LP 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 242 252000430 SINGLE-FAMILY DALE & MARY ANDERSON 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 243 252000440 SINGLE-FAMILY CHAD SHARKEY & SARAH FORSMAN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 244 252000450 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & JESSICA SHAUGHNESSY 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 245 252000460 SINGLE-FAMILY ARNOLD & LORNA LEMKE 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 48 TOTAL 94,080.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Roadway Assessment Assessment Totals Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - REDWING LANE AREA 422,000.00$ 7,670.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 246 251600030 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ANNE MCGINN 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 247 251620130 SINGLE-FAMILY LESTER & JUDY BOLSTAD 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 248 251620140 SINGLE-FAMILY GEOFFREY & JULIA SEPER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 249 251620150 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & AMANDA DURRANT 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 250 251620160 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & TERESA SCHREMPP 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 251 251620170 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER UNGER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 252 251620180 SINGLE-FAMILY BRADLEY & KAROL JOHNSON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 253 251620190 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & KATHRYN MOZDREN 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 254 251620200 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & SUSAN DUCHENE 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 255 251620210 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & PAMELA O'CONNOR 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 256 251620220 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT KAHLMEYER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 257 251620010 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON LOCHER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 258 251620020 SINGLE-FAMILY RANDALL & TRACY BENSON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 259 251620030 SINGLE-FAMILY LISA SLEZAK-MOSER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 260 251620040 SINGLE-FAMILY BRYCE FIER & MARY MARKUN-FIER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 261 251620050 SINGLE-FAMILY REBECCA HADRYS 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 262 251620060 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & DENISE CLARKE 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 263 251620070 SINGLE-FAMILY ANTONIO & AMY FRICANO 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 264 251620080 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & MONICA KOSVIC 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 265 251620090 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & PATTI MANNING 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 266 251620100 SINGLE-FAMILY JORGE GUANTER-GALTES & MIREIA MONLLOR TORMOS 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 267 258710050 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & MARY LYNN PATTERSON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 268 258710040 SINGLE-FAMILY EDWARD & PAMELA CAPPELLE 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 269 258710030 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL JOHNSON & GWEN WESTPHAL-JOHNSON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 270 258710020 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY KIFFIN 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 271 258710010 SINGLE-FAMILY ZANE & ARCELIA DETERT 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 272 258690020 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & MAREN REEDER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 273 258690030 SINGLE-FAMILY CLAUS & LEONARDA CANELL 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 274 258690040 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & JODIE KUEPPERS 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 275 258690050 SINGLE-FAMILY JAY & LAURIE DONOHUE 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 276 258690060 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & KAREN FLYNN 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 277 258690070 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH CALDWELL 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 278 258690080 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & KATHLEEN ANDERSON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 279 258690090 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEXANDER & KAITLIN HAAR 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 280 258690100 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN & JODIE GRADY 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 281 258690110 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN & KAREN WUJEK 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 282 258690120 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & KATHLEEN NORTON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 283 258690010 SINGLE-FAMILY CURTIS BINDER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 284 258710210 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & FOTINI DONNELLY 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 285 258730010 SINGLE-FAMILY PHILIP & LEEANNE LARSON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 286 258730020 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & AMY CONWAY 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 287 258710060 SINGLE-FAMILY PAMELA LIBBY 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 288 258710070 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & BARBARA HANSEN 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 289 258710080 SINGLE-FAMILY WALTER & CONSTANCE LINDER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 290 258710090 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & SARAH CAVIN 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 291 258710100 SINGLE-FAMILY DONALD & CANDACE DECOSSE 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 292 258710110 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & KATHERINE BENSON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 293 258710120 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY & NESSA SANDER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 294 258710130 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & ELIZABETH MANNING 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 295 258710140 SINGLE-FAMILY VITO & MELAINIE QUAGLIA 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 296 258710150 SINGLE-FAMILY DOUGLAS & DARLENE OLSEN 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 297 258710160 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHERIN HUYS 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 298 258710170 SINGLE-FAMILY KORD & HEATHER BRASHEAR 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 299 258710180 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & ALANA HOPP 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 299A 258530030 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ANNE REV TRUST 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ TOTAL 168,740.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Roadway Assessment Assessment Totals Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA 1,897,000.00$ 7,620.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 300 252110010 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & SARA MUENCH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 301 252110020 SINGLE-FAMILY PATRICK & WILHELMINE GALLAGHER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 302 252110030 SINGLE-FAMILY KEVIN & DEBRA COOPER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 303 252110040 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & BRYAN WEIGEL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 304 252110050 SINGLE-FAMILY JONNA SHIELDS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 305 252110060 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & GERI MURPHY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 306 252130130 SINGLE-FAMILY SARAH PRUETT & ERIC CHULMAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 307 252130120 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & JANE HOGAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 308 252130110 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID PELTIER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 309 252130100 SINGLE-FAMILY SANDRA REISHUS & MEGAN JENSEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 310 252130090 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD EWALD & POLLY STIVLAND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 311 252130080 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHAN & MARTHA SCHRADER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 312 252130070 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & TIFFANY FISCO 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 313 258640040 SINGLE-FAMILY KAREN LARSEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 314 258640050 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & SUSAN VOELKER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 315 258640090 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & STEPHANIE DILLE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 316 258640080 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK HODDER & XUNYU QIAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 317 258640070 SINGLE-FAMILY TODD & SHELLEY KOLAND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 318 258640060 SINGLE-FAMILY CHARLES & LINNETTE BETTS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 319 258650130 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & KATIE WENDORFF 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 320 258650140 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & ALICE KLINKENBERG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 321 258650150 SINGLE-FAMILY BRET & JENNIFER BARHOOVER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 322 258650160 SINGLE-FAMILY JAYNE ARABANOS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 323 258650170 SINGLE-FAMILY LORI & TROY ROOVERS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 324 258650180 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & SYDNEY ROSENBERG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 325 258650190 SINGLE-FAMILY AMY & SCOTT HAIRSTON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 326 258650200 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFERY & SALLY GADBOIS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 327 258070010 SINGLE-FAMILY PETER & KATHERINE LUCAS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 328 258090010 SINGLE-FAMILY RANDAL & BRECK STORTS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 329 258090020 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & JULIETTE SCHNEIDER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 330 258090120 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL CARR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 331 258090110 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & SARAH EBELING 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 332 258090100 SINGLE-FAMILY CYNTHIA COLSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 333 258090090 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & MICHELLE STORK 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 334 258090080 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & SUZANNE BOHN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 335 258090070 SINGLE-FAMILY BRADLEY BILLINGS & ANITA CORNELIUS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 336 258090060 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEXANDER & KARENEA LAI 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 337 258090050 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & KAREN CONBOY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 338 258090040 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & KRISTEN HANSBERRY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 339 258090030 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & DIANA DAVIS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 340 258090160 SINGLE-FAMILY TIMOTHY KOCHER & CATHERINE CONNEL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 341 258090170 SINGLE-FAMILY KEVIN & KATHERIN WORMS-LYNCH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 342 258090180 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL NOBLE & BONNIE BURNS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 343 258090190 SINGLE-FAMILY GLENNA & CARIN STOLAR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 344 258070210 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & ANN MARIE HAYES 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 345 258070220 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & LISA SIMMONS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 346 258070230 SINGLE-FAMILY TINA & JORDAN LAMB 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 347 258580110 SINGLE-FAMILY COREY & JULIE SMITH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 348 258580100 SINGLE-FAMILY ROGER & GAYLE STECH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 349 258580090 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SHALINI CARNEY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 350 258580080 SINGLE-FAMILY KEVIN CAMPBELL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 351 258580070 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & LINDA ROSLANKSKY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 352 258580060 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEXANDRA WOODS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 353 258570080 SINGLE-FAMILY IGOR KOROLEV & KAREN JORDAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 354 258570070 SINGLE-FAMILY JENNIFER & JOSEPH BECKMAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 355 258570060 SINGLE-FAMILY WAYNE & PAMELA BENBOW 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 356 258570050 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SONJA PRETASKY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 357 258570040 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN & STACY ROHAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 358 258570030 SINGLE-FAMILY RONALD & LYDIA VELANDER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 359 258570020 SINGLE-FAMILY THEODORE & HILARY BECKMAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 360 258570010 SINGLE-FAMILY TREVOR & LYN MCCULLOCH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 361 252140050 SINGLE-FAMILY SACHA LIVING 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 362 252140060 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & SALLY BICKEL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 363 252140070 SINGLE-FAMILY HAYLEY & DAVIS ZISMER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 364 252140080 SINGLE-FAMILY ADAM & HEATHER WILFORD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 365 252140010 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & HEIDI PRESTEEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 366 252140020 SINGLE-FAMILY PETER & JANET MADDALENA 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 367 252140030 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & KRISTINE MOES 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 368 252140040 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & MARY JO BROKAW 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 369 252120010 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & LISA HAZZARD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 370 252120020 SINGLE-FAMILY ALLAN GREEN & KRISTINE SEVERSON-GREEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 371 252120030 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & LAURA ORCUTT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 372 252120040 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN & LISA CARLSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 373 252110210 SINGLE-FAMILY FRANK & CATHERINE ZIMMERMAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 374 252110200 SINGLE-FAMILY EDWIN & REBECCA EVERETT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 375 252110190 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & LINDA BENDT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 376 252110180 SINGLE-FAMILY VARSHA KANDLIKAR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 377 252110170 SINGLE-FAMILY LOREN & DEBORAH GORDON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 378 252110160 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & SUSAN BRADY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 379 252110150 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & SUSAN REISS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 380 252090180 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & ALEXANDRA BIXLER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 381 252090170 SINGLE-FAMILY NORMA KEIVES 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ Roadway Assessment CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - TRAPPERS PASS AREA 1,897,000.00$ 7,620.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT Roadway Assessment CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - TRAPPERS PASS AREA 382 252090160 SINGLE-FAMILY PATRICK & ALISHA MURRAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 383 252090150 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & AMY BURTON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 384 252090140 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & LAURINDA SCHUMACHER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 385 252090130 SINGLE-FAMILY DONALD & CHRISTINE SNEDE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 386 252090120 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & MARIAN HEINEMANN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 387 252090110 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & KATHLEEN ALBRECHT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 388 252090100 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & NANCY RYDLAND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 389 252090090 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & MARGO ANDERSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 390 252090080 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN & SARA YOCHUM 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 391 252100110 SINGLE-FAMILY ALICE LAINE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 392 252100100 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JANICE MOSTROM 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 393 252100090 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & AIMEE ANDREOTTI 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 394 252100080 SINGLE-FAMILY TODD & SARAH MCCUTCHEON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 395 252100070 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & DOROTHY BELLING 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 396 252100060 SINGLE-FAMILY TRAVIS LEMKE & KELLI BROWER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 397 252100050 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JAMIELYNN AHLSTEDT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 398 252100040 SINGLE-FAMILY PETER & KAREN MURRAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 399 252100030 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & MICHELLE KLISANICH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 400 252100020 SINGLE-FAMILY DEREK & MELISSA STEVENS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 401 252100010 SINGLE-FAMILY ANTHONY & AMY HORNING 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 402 252070010 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY & JOAN TAM 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 403 255500040 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFEREY SCHRIMPF 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 404 255500050 SINGLE-FAMILY NANCY STORM 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 405 255500060 SINGLE-FAMILY DOUGLAS & ANGELA HOWE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 406 255500070 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ELIZABETH SCAMAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 407 255500080 SINGLE-FAMILY TERENCE MEYER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 408 255500090 SINGLE-FAMILY MARY BRANDT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 409 255500100 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & JENNIFER DISNEY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 410 255500110 SINGLE-FAMILY LISA MARIE SHENCK 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 411 255500120 SINGLE-FAMILY JAY & KELLY BEAUDRY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 412 255500130 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID BENNETT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 413 255500140 SINGLE-FAMILY MEAGHAN & STEVEN VANDERSANDEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 414 255500150 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMI & KAREN SCHUPP 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 415 255500160 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & REBECCA OLSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 416 255500170 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEXANDR BEZVERKHNIY & GALINA ZAIKOVSKAYA 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 417 255500180 SINGLE-FAMILY JOE SIMMONS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 418 255500190 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & KATHLEEN MAHANNAH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 419 255500200 SINGLE-FAMILY ROVERT & KATHY REIMLER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 420 255500210 SINGLE-FAMILY CARL HAWKINSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 421 255500220 SINGLE-FAMILY BRETT WILLIAMS & BRIDGET BURKEL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 422 255500230 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & JANN VARNER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 423 255500240 SINGLE-FAMILY NATALIE MARIE HARVEY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 424 255500250 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 425 255500260 SINGLE-FAMILY JODI LATWOOD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 426 255500270 SINGLE-FAMILY ALBERT & JANINE AFFLITTO 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 427 255500280 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & LESLIE MCKEAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 428 255500290 SINGLE-FAMILY KURT & MAIA KNOX 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 429 255500300 SINGLE-FAMILY JERRY & CAROL MCDONALD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 430 255500310 SINGLE-FAMILY GARY & SHARON HARRIS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 431 255500320 SINGLE-FAMILY RAJIV & KAVYYA DAMA 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 432 255500330 SINGLE-FAMILY CARA BENOIT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 433 255500340 SINGLE-FAMILY YEAN CHING TAN & GIBSON NENE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 434 252080190 SINGLE-FAMILY KARIM & FAIDA MAMMADOVA 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 435 252080180 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHAN & COLLEEN HATZUNG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 436 252080170 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & HEIDI NAUMAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 437 252080160 SINGLE-FAMILY NANCY LUNDGREN-SMITH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 438 252080150 SINGLE-FAMILY BRADY HORMANN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 439 252080140 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL KRUGER & DEBORAH ROBERTS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 440 252080130 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON & JEAN RUSINAK 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 441 252080120 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSHUA & KELLI BILLS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 442 252080110 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFERY & CATHERINE BRECKHEIMER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 443 252080100 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & TIFFANY KLINKENBERG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 444 252080090 SINGLE-FAMILY DELLY DEWITT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 445 252080080 SINGLE-FAMILY DEREK & JAMIE NELSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 446 252080070 SINGLE-FAMILY REBECCA KNEZEVIC 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 447 252080060 SINGLE-FAMILY JENNIFER & CRAIG RAUEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 448 252080050 SINGLE-FAMILY LEE & KAREN BORIL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 449 252080040 SINGLE-FAMILY TRISTAN & ADRIENNE AGRE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 450 252080030 SINGLE-FAMILY SARAH SWEDLUND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 451 252080020 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JAMIE MANNING 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 452 252080010 SINGLE-FAMILY ANDREW & ELIZABETH GUSTAFSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 453 258070200 SINGLE-FAMILY MIKEAL BYSTROM JR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 454 258070190 SINGLE-FAMILY ALICIA JEAN PAVELKO 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 455 258070180 SINGLE-FAMILY KELLY NEVERMANN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 456 258070170 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & CHELSEA MILLER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 457 258070160 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & ALISON BUICK 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 458 258070150 SINGLE-FAMILY EVAN MARIASH & KELLY FIDGEON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 459 258070140 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SARAH WENTZIEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 460 258090150 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & CHRISTINE STONE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 461 258090140 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & KENAN GUILMETTE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 462 258090130 SINGLE-FAMILY JOAN & BURTON BENSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 463 258070130 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & SARAH WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 1,897,000.00$ 7,620.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT Roadway Assessment CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - TRAPPERS PASS AREA 464 258070120 SINGLE-FAMILY DERRICK BILDERBEEK & DYAN PADGETT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 465 258070110 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN & AMY KROLL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 466 258070100 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & JERILYN HOOKS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 467 258070090 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & TERRY DENUCCI 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 468 258070080 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN & JEANNINE SMITH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 469 258580120 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JULIA NEWELL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 470 258580130 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JEANENE CONZEMIUS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 471 258580140 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHRYN & JOHN WILLIAMS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 472 258580150 SINGLE-FAMILY KASHIF HASAN & SHAHEEN IQBAL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 473 258580160 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN ERICKSON & JENNIFER SMOLKA 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 474 258070020 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & JILL JOHNSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 475 258070030 SINGLE-FAMILY TIMOTHY & JEANNE PIETRINI 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 476 258070040 SINGLE-FAMILY HOLLY & TONY FERRARO 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 477 258070050 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & KIMBERLY COREY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 478 258070060 SINGLE-FAMILY LINDA & TIMOTHY RUDE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 479 258070070 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JILL RAMSEY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 480 258650010 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & JILL KOKKINEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 481 258650020 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & LIZABETH MONTGOMERY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 482 258650030 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & JANE MCGINTY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 483 258650040 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & LAURA WILLIAMS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 484 258650050 SINGLE-FAMILY DOUGLAS & STEPHANIE HAALAND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 485 258570110 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & SAMANTHA CASSIOPPI 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 486 258570120 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN & JANE WARNER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 487 258570130 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & MELISSA SUNDBOOM 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 488 258570140 SINGLE-FAMILY BRANDT & KATHY COLVILLE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 489 258570150 SINGLE-FAMILY IGOR & ANASTASIA ARKHIPENKOV 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 490 258570160 SINGLE-FAMILY ALYESKA PROPERTIES 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 491 258570170 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & DEBORAH LEUY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 492 258650060 SINGLE-FAMILY MARC WITTENBERG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 493 258650070 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & TARA STONE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 494 258650080 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & AMY JOINER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 495 258650090 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & KATHERINE O'BRIEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 496 258650100 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & NANCY GIESE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 497 258650110 SINGLE-FAMILY IAN & SALLY SHEPHERD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 498 258650120 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & LAURIE FLECK 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 499 258640030 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & PAMELA PITTENGER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 500 258640020 SINGLE-FAMILY LISA MURIEL LUND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 501 258640010 SINGLE-FAMILY LANDON & SARAH GUILDAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 502 258580050 SINGLE-FAMILY MARY GOAD-OLSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 503 258580040 SINGLE-FAMILY CARL & ALEXIS FRIEDR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 504 258580030 SINGLE-FAMILY KEVIN & BROOKE SLAMA 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 505 258570090 SINGLE-FAMILY ADAM & ROBBIN SCHAFER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 506 258570100 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & NICOLE CAMPION 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 507 258570180 SINGLE-FAMILY RAMON & PATRICIA CONTRERAS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 508 258570190 SINGLE-FAMILY TERESA HODNET 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 509 258580010 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & BARBARA ROY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 510 258580020 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBER & MARLYS SCHWABE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 511 252130010 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & JUNE BENTRUP 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 512 252130020 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & EMILY STRONG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 513 252130030 SINGLE-FAMILY CATHERINE & STEVEN NORRIS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 514 252130040 SINGLE-FAMILY ABIGAIL & JUSTIN KLOUS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 515 252130050 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & KAREN CASEY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 516 252130060 SINGLE-FAMILY BURCH & MARTHA SCHULTZ 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 517 252110140 SINGLE-FAMILY HPA JV BORROWER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 518 252110130 SINGLE-FAMILY TIMOTHTY & LORI DOSEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 519 252110120 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & MARGERITE BOROWSKI 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 520 252110110 SINGLE-FAMILY MARY JOAN LORENZEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 521 252110100 SINGLE-FAMILY REBEKAH DUNHAM 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 522 252110090 SINGLE-FAMILY CYNTHIA & JOHN PUGH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 523 252110080 SINGLE-FAMILY JUSTIN & APRIL UELAND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 524 252110070 SINGLE-FAMILY GREGORY & LEAH THOMPSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 525 252070020 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID CARLSON & CAROLE FICK 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 526 252100120 SINGLE-FAMILY SHANNA O'BRIEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 527 252100130 SINGLE-FAMILY JUDITH JAMES 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 528 252100140 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & MICAELA YANDA 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 529 252100150 SINGLE-FAMILY SEAN KNUTSEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 530 252100160 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & SANDRA BUTLER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 531 252090010 SINGLE-FAMILY CHERYL MAGERS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 532 252090020 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & CHERYL AYOTTE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 533 252090030 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & ANTOINETTE SCHRUPP 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 534 252090040 SINGLE-FAMILY CAMERON & CATHERINE GUTHRIE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 535 252090050 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & DIANE RUGLAND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 536 252090060 SINGLE-FAMILY KYLE JOHNSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 537 252090070 SINGLE-FAMILY TODD & LEE MORTENSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 538 255500470 SINGLE-FAMILY SCOTT STALMAN & KATHERIN GLYNN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 539 255500460 SINGLE-FAMILY NANCY ANN MYHRE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 540 255500450 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT DOHERTY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 541 255500440 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN WEINZIERL & LAUREN CALLAHAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 542 255500430 SINGLE-FAMILY 101 SHASTA LLC 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 543 255500420 SINGLE-FAMILY MARNEE SHEPARD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 544 255500410 SINGLE-FAMILY CARLTON & ANNE MOORE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 545 255500400 SINGLE-FAMILY GLEN FEUERBORN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 1,897,000.00$ 7,620.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT Roadway Assessment CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - TRAPPERS PASS AREA 546 252070040 SINGLE-FAMILY LARRY & GAIL BEUNING 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 547 252070030 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & MARY GIOVINCO 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 548 255500370 SINGLE-FAMILY LISA & EDWARD ESTLOW 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 249 TOTAL 758,952.00$Assessment Totals 2020 Special Assessment Changes/Modifications from previous year’s projects: 1. The first payment for this year’s assessment will not be due until May 15, 2021, as part of your 2021 property tax bill. 2. Staff is recommending the delay of the interest free full payment deadline from October 1st until November 23rd. Delaying this will give all property owners the ability to pay the full assessment with no interest by nearly two months. In addition by delaying this deadline, all those that use the assessment process to pay for the improvements will also experience nearly two additional months of less interest on their 2021 assessment. 3. Interest rates have fallen over the last several months by 2.25%. The result will be a lower than anticipated revenue impact to the Revolving Assessment Construction fund. The positive is residents will experience interest rates that will meet the lowest rates for Special Assessments in decades. The current prime rate is 3.25% resulting in interest rates for these projects to be at 5.25% (calculated at simple interest and not compounded). Had this project been issued last year or earlier this year the interest rate could have been between 6.75%-7.50% instead of 5.25%. 4. If the city council wanted to delay all special assessments for this year to be not put on the taxes until 2022, the impact would be the Revolving Assessment Construction Fund will be in a negative cash position (I have attached comparative spreadsheets for review). In that instance, city council would have to direct staff to transfer in funds from another fund to cover the negative cash position at least temporarily. 5. Lastly, if there are any questions by any resident about their financing options for any of the projects please don’t hesitate to email or call Greg Sticha in the Finance Department. He would be happy to explain the assessment process and go over the impacts of the assessment with anyone who has a question or concern. gsticha@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 952-227-1149 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 27, 2020 Subject Review of Claims Paid 04272020 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: J.1. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: SUMMARY The following claims are submitted for review on April 27, 2020: Check Numbers Amounts 172978 – 173077 $675,141.53 ACH Payments $178,946.91 Total All Claims $854,088.44 ATTACHMENTS: Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 4/21/2020 2:26 PM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount ABCCLE ABC Cleaning, LLC 04/10/2020 0.00 819.00172978 ALLSTR ALLSTREAM 04/10/2020 0.00 490.84172979 AMETIR AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 04/10/2020 0.00 906.51172980 ANDEDAIS DAISY ANDERSON 04/10/2020 0.00 35.40172981 CARTEC Carahsoft Technology Corporation 04/10/2020 0.00 1,725.00172982 CARTRE CARVER COUNTY TREASURER 04/10/2020 0.00 400.00172983 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/10/2020 0.00 3,424.09172984 EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 0.00 1,845.59172985 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 04/10/2020 0.00 649.00172986 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 04/10/2020 0.00 45,020.82172987 GleJul Julie and John Gleason 04/10/2020 0.00 250.00172988 GOGYMN Go Gymnastics 04/10/2020 0.00 1,041.60172989 INDLIG INDUSTRIAL AND RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING, INC04/10/2020 0.00 12.00172990 Loc49 IUOE Local #49 04/10/2020 0.00 735.00172991 METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 04/10/2020 0.00 172,654.49172992 MIDPLA MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES 04/10/2020 0.00 1,348.00172993 NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 04/10/2020 0.00 96.00172994 MNPLUM MN Plumbing & Home Service Inc 04/10/2020 0.00 30.25172995 MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 04/10/2020 0.00 165.18172996 QUAFIR Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 04/10/2020 0.00 400.00172997 ReeIsi Isiah Reese 04/10/2020 0.00 125.00172998 SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS 04/10/2020 0.00 469.02172999 SHOTRU SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 04/10/2020 0.00 19.48173000 SMHEN SM HENTGES & SONS 04/10/2020 0.00 252,018.65173001 SOUSUB Southwest Suburban Publishing 04/10/2020 0.00 173.15173002 TFOFIN TFORCE FINAL MILE 04/10/2020 0.00 51.72173003 TheHart The Hartford 04/10/2020 0.00 1,103.93173004 ThoMat Matthew Thomas 04/10/2020 0.00 100.00173005 tricon Tri-S Contstruction Supply, LLC 04/10/2020 0.00 979.26173006 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 04/10/2020 0.00 1,488.15173007 AMETIR AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 04/17/2020 0.00 237.21173043 bffas B & F Fastener Supply 04/17/2020 0.00 5.71173044 BCATRA BCA 04/17/2020 0.00 15.00173045 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/17/2020 0.00 1,007.18173046 CenLin CenturyLink 04/17/2020 0.00 64.00173047 ContEngi Contech Engineered Solutions LLC 04/17/2020 0.00 55.20173048 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 04/17/2020 0.00 3,812.60173049 CriRob Robert Crippa 04/17/2020 0.00 100.00173050 CulBot Culligan Bottled Water 04/17/2020 0.00 105.07173051 DiveCons Diverse Construction Services, LLC 04/17/2020 0.00 2,607.79173052 EHLERS EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 04/17/2020 0.00 367.50173053 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 04/17/2020 0.00 5,584.06173054 FlePri FleetPride, Inc.04/17/2020 0.00 335.65173055 HeaPar HealthPartners, Inc.04/17/2020 0.00 70,569.46173056 HENRERIK Erik Henricksen 04/17/2020 0.00 900.00173057 HERLAN HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 04/17/2020 0.00 272.00173058 HerPlu Hero Plumbing Heating & Cooling 04/17/2020 0.00 63.14173059 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (4/21/2020 2:26 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount JRRAD J & R COMPLETE AUTO & RADIATOR REPAIR04/17/2020 0.00 269.94173060 JAGCOM Jaguar Communications Inc 04/17/2020 0.00 53.60173061 KENGRA KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 04/17/2020 0.00 2,600.00173062 MNUCFU Minnesota UC Fund 04/17/2020 0.00 1,788.00173063 NEWSIG NEWMAN SIGNS INC 04/17/2020 0.00 1,770.20173064 PILDRY PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 04/17/2020 0.00 232.85173065 PowCoa Powder Coating Technologies 04/17/2020 0.00 2,795.00173066 sioval Sioux Valley Environmental 04/17/2020 0.00 750.00173067 SOFHOU SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 04/17/2020 0.00 64.20173068 Stryker Stryker Medical 04/17/2020 0.00 12,672.74173069 SwaJac Jacqueline Swanson 04/17/2020 0.00 50.00173070 TayEle Taylor Electric Company, LLC 04/17/2020 0.00 12,340.00173071 THECON THEIS CONSTRUCTION CO 04/17/2020 0.00 46,122.56173072 TOWFEN TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 04/17/2020 0.00 2,100.00173073 TRISTA TRI STATE BOBCAT INC 04/17/2020 0.00 359.90173074 ThrEmb Pamela Turpin 04/17/2020 0.00 152.00173075 VALRIC VALLEY-RICH CO INC 04/17/2020 0.00 14,976.84173076 VisSew Visu-Sewer Inc 04/17/2020 0.00 1,365.00173077 Report Total (65 checks): 675,141.53 0.00 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (4/21/2020 2:26 PM) Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User: dwashburn Printed: 4/21/2020 2:26 PM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH AMEENG AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING 04/10/2020 0.00 41,265.63 ACH apadan Apadana LLC 04/10/2020 0.00 23,774.15 ACH CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON 04/10/2020 0.00 17,402.21 ACH carcou Carver County 04/10/2020 0.00 18,608.60 ACH CCPNIM CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 04/10/2020 0.00 5,631.37 ACH EmeRes Emergency Response Solutions 04/10/2020 0.00 77.07 ACH engwat Engel Water Testing Inc 04/10/2020 0.00 500.00 ACH GOPSTA GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 04/10/2020 0.00 398.25 ACH HenPro Henning Professional Services, Inc 04/10/2020 0.00 1,618.50 ACH HOIKOE HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 04/10/2020 0.00 1,735.00 ACH INDLAN Indoor Landscapes Inc 04/10/2020 0.00 187.00 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/10/2020 0.00 127.03 ACH Marco Marco Inc 04/10/2020 0.00 970.68 ACH MERACE MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 0.00 1,179.89 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/10/2020 0.00 764.23 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 04/10/2020 0.00 63.06 ACH PotMN Potentia MN Solar 04/10/2020 0.00 4,700.10 ACH PRARES PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 04/10/2020 0.00 800.00 ACH SunLif Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 0.00 1,419.85 ACH UniFar United Farmers Cooperative 04/10/2020 0.00 439.96 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 04/10/2020 0.00 30.40 ACH VESSCO VESSCO INC 04/10/2020 0.00 365.98 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/10/2020 0.00 16,322.50 ACH WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC 04/10/2020 0.00 25.53 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 04/10/2020 0.00 126.54 ACH BENEXT BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 04/17/2020 0.00 86.35 ACH BERCAS BERGERSON CASWELL INC 04/17/2020 0.00 8,887.50 ACH BOLMEN BOLTON & MENK INC 04/17/2020 0.00 7,044.00 ACH BOYTRU Boyer Ford Trucks 04/17/2020 0.00 127.80 ACH CONCUT CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC 04/17/2020 0.00 325.00 ACH ELEPUM ELECTRIC PUMP INC 04/17/2020 0.00 6,850.92 ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 04/17/2020 0.00 841.38 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/17/2020 0.00 475.20 ACH KORTER KORTERRA INC 04/17/2020 0.00 1,000.00 ACH LOCSUP LOCATORS AND SUPPLIES INC 04/17/2020 0.00 146.03 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/17/2020 0.00 5,829.25 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 04/17/2020 0.00 456.21 ACH POMTIR POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 04/17/2020 0.00 3,113.15 ACH PREMRM PRECISE MRM LLC 04/17/2020 0.00 300.00 ACH PreWat Premium Waters, Inc 04/17/2020 0.00 78.69 ACH RUFJOH RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO 04/17/2020 0.00 145.66 ACH StanTruc Standard Spring-Truck Suspension Parts 04/17/2020 0.00 1,427.92 ACH STREIC STREICHER'S 04/17/2020 0.00 219.91 ACH MINCON SUMMIT COMPANIES 04/17/2020 0.00 300.00 ACH TCIInc TCIC, Inc. 04/17/2020 0.00 150.00 Page 1 of 2 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH VESSCO VESSCO INC 04/17/2020 0.00 707.20 ACH WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC 04/17/2020 0.00 517.33 ACH ZARBRU ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 04/17/2020 0.00 1,383.88 Report Total: 0.00 178,946.91 Page 2 of 2 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 04/21/2020 - 2:30 PM Name Check Da Account Description Amount ABC Cleaning, LLC 04/10/2020 101-1190-4350 March Cleaning Service - Library 704.00 ABC Cleaning, LLC 04/10/2020 101-1170-4350 March Cleaning Service - City Hall 115.00 ABC Cleaning, LLC 819.00 ALLSTREAM 04/10/2020 101-1160-4300 Mitel Phone System Maintenance 490.84 ALLSTREAM 490.84 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 04/17/2020 101-1550-4120 Tires 237.21 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 04/10/2020 101-1550-4120 Tires 906.51 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 1,143.72 ANDERSON DAISY 04/10/2020 101-1220-4290 Clocks for Duty Rooms 35.40 ANDERSON DAISY 35.40 B & F Fastener Supply 04/17/2020 101-1320-4140 Parts 5.71 B & F Fastener Supply 5.71 BCA 04/17/2020 101-1120-4300 Background Investigation 15.00 BCA 15.00 Carahsoft Technology Corporation 04/10/2020 101-1160-4370 LinkedIn Learning Annual Renewal 1,725.00 Carahsoft Technology Corporation 1,725.00 CARVER COUNTY TREASURER 04/10/2020 300-0000-4300 Tax Charges 400.00 CARVER COUNTY TREASURER 400.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/17/2020 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service- 3900 Highway 7 19.28 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/17/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service- 3900 Highway 7 5.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/17/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service- 6930 Minnewashta Pkwy 16.80 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/17/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service- 6930 Minnewashta Pkwy 5.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/17/2020 101-1370-4320 Monthly Charges- 7901 Park Place 752.88 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/17/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Charges- 7901 Park Place 94.11 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/17/2020 701-0000-4320 Monthly Charges- 7901 Park Place 94.11 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/17/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Charges- 7901 Park Place 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/10/2020 101-1550-4320 Monthly Service- 1456 W 78th Street 206.89 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/10/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service- 1456 W 78th Street 9.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/10/2020 700-7043-4320 Monthly Service- 2100 Lake Harrison Rd 1,084.04 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/10/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service- 2100 Lake Harrison Rd 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/10/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service- 2323 Lake Lucy Rd 36.96 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/21/2020 - 2:30 PM)Page 1 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/10/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service- 2323 Lake Lucy Rd 5.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/10/2020 700-7019-4320 Monthly Service- 201 W 79th St 286.56 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/10/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service- 201 W 79th St 9.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/10/2020 101-1190-4320 Monthly Service- 7711 Kerber Blvd 963.57 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/10/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service- 7711 Kerber Blvd 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/10/2020 101-1170-4320 Monthly Service- 7700 Market Blvd 763.07 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 04/10/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service- 7700 Market Blvd 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 4,431.27 CenturyLink 04/17/2020 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 32.00 CenturyLink 04/17/2020 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 32.00 CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 101-1170-4310 Monthly Charges 850.74 CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 700-0000-4310 Monthly Charges 6.36 CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 701-0000-4310 Monthly Charges 6.36 CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 101-1550-4310 Monthly Charges 30.04 CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 101-1350-4310 Monthly Charges 30.04 CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 101-1220-4310 Monthly Charges 33.04 CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 101-1370-4310 Monthly Charges 50.88 CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 101-1160-4320 Monthly Charges 125.00 CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 101-1540-4310 Monthly Charges 95.40 CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 101-1190-4310 Monthly Charges 127.20 CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 700-0000-4310 Monthly Charges 15.12 CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 700-7019-4310 Monthly Charges 210.28 CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 701-0000-4310 Monthly Charges 15.13 CENTURYLINK 04/10/2020 101-1160-4320 Monthly Charges 250.00 CENTURYLINK 1,909.59 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC 04/17/2020 701-0000-4551 Parts 55.20 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC 55.20 CORE & MAIN LP 04/17/2020 700-0000-4550 Parts 3,812.60 CORE & MAIN LP 04/10/2020 700-0000-4250 Meters 649.00 CORE & MAIN LP 4,461.60 Crippa Robert 04/17/2020 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00 Crippa Robert 100.00 Culligan Bottled Water 04/17/2020 101-1220-4300 Bottle Water Service - Fire Department 105.07 Culligan Bottled Water 105.07 Diverse Construction Services, LLC 04/17/2020 101-1220-4300 Repair 1,825.23 Diverse Construction Services, LLC 04/17/2020 101-1170-4300 Repair 782.56 Diverse Construction Services, LLC 2,607.79 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 04/17/2020 300-0000-4300 Frontier Redevelopment 2 367.50 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 367.50 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 04/17/2020 700-0000-4550 Parts 4,770.65 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/21/2020 - 2:30 PM)Page 2 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Ferguson Waterworks #2518 04/17/2020 701-0000-4530 Winch Repair Certifaction 740.47 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 04/17/2020 700-0000-4250 Parts 72.94 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 04/10/2020 700-0000-4250 Parts 32,321.80 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 04/10/2020 700-0000-4250 Parts/Horns 12,699.02 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 50,604.88 FleetPride, Inc.04/17/2020 101-1370-4170 Fuel 138.37 FleetPride, Inc.04/17/2020 101-1320-4140 Parts 197.28 FleetPride, Inc. 335.65 Gleason Julie and John 04/10/2020 815-8202-2024 6941 Nez Perce Drive - Permit 2020-00479 250.00 Gleason Julie and John 250.00 Go Gymnastics 04/10/2020 101-1537-3631 Gymnastics Class 1,041.60 Go Gymnastics 1,041.60 HealthPartners, Inc.04/17/2020 101-0000-2012 May - Family 32,812.69 HealthPartners, Inc.04/17/2020 101-0000-2012 May - Family 1,582.10 HealthPartners, Inc.04/17/2020 210-0000-2012 May - Family 395.53 HealthPartners, Inc.04/17/2020 700-0000-2012 May - Family 4,509.01 HealthPartners, Inc.04/17/2020 701-0000-2012 May - Family 4,509.01 HealthPartners, Inc.04/17/2020 720-0000-2012 May - Family 2,072.56 HealthPartners, Inc.04/17/2020 101-0000-2012 May - Single 18,453.14 HealthPartners, Inc.04/17/2020 210-0000-2012 May - Single 633.04 HealthPartners, Inc.04/17/2020 700-0000-2012 May - Single 2,769.54 HealthPartners, Inc.04/17/2020 701-0000-2012 May - Single 1,503.46 HealthPartners, Inc.04/17/2020 720-0000-2012 May - Single 1,329.38 HealthPartners, Inc. 70,569.46 Henricksen Erik 04/17/2020 101-1310-4370 PE Refresher Course 900.00 Henricksen Erik 900.00 HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 04/17/2020 420-0000-4751 Dirt 272.00 HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 272.00 Hero Plumbing Heating & Cooling 04/17/2020 101-0000-2033 overpayment on permit 2020-00713 63.14 Hero Plumbing Heating & Cooling 63.14 INDUSTRIAL AND RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING, INC 04/10/2020 101-1190-4510 Light Trap Holder 12.00 INDUSTRIAL AND RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING, INC 12.00 IUOE Local #49 04/10/2020 700-0000-2004 PR Batch 00410.04.2020 Local 49 dues 240.25 IUOE Local #49 04/10/2020 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00410.04.2020 Local 49 dues 447.99 IUOE Local #49 04/10/2020 701-0000-2004 PR Batch 00410.04.2020 Local 49 dues 46.76 IUOE Local #49 735.00 J & R COMPLETE AUTO & RADIATOR REPAIR 04/17/2020 101-1220-4520 Radiator Repair 269.94 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/21/2020 - 2:30 PM)Page 3 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount J & R COMPLETE AUTO & RADIATOR REPAIR 269.94 Jaguar Communications Inc 04/17/2020 700-7043-4310 Fiber Business Line 53.60 Jaguar Communications Inc 53.60 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 04/17/2020 300-0000-4300 Frontier Building Redevelopment 2,600.00 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 2,600.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 04/10/2020 701-0000-4509 Waste Water Services 172,654.49 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 172,654.49 MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES 04/10/2020 101-1550-4120 Playground Equipment 1,348.00 MIDWEST PLAYSCAPES 1,348.00 Minnesota UC Fund 04/17/2020 101-1370-4060 Quarter 1, 2020 Unemployment 1,609.20 Minnesota UC Fund 04/17/2020 700-0000-4060 Quarter 1, 2020 Unemployment 89.40 Minnesota UC Fund 04/17/2020 701-0000-4060 Quarter 1, 2020 Unemployment 89.40 Minnesota UC Fund 1,788.00 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 04/10/2020 101-0000-2011 PR Batch 00410.04.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 68.02 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 04/10/2020 210-0000-2011 PR Batch 00410.04.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 3.98 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 04/10/2020 700-0000-2011 PR Batch 00410.04.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 11.32 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 04/10/2020 701-0000-2011 PR Batch 00410.04.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 11.09 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 04/10/2020 720-0000-2011 PR Batch 00410.04.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 1.59 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 96.00 MN Plumbing & Home Service Inc 04/10/2020 101-0000-2033 Overpayment on permit 2020-00555 30.25 MN Plumbing & Home Service Inc 30.25 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 04/10/2020 101-1550-4120 Parts 165.18 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 165.18 NEWMAN SIGNS INC 04/17/2020 101-1320-4560 Signs 1,770.20 NEWMAN SIGNS INC 1,770.20 PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 04/17/2020 101-1220-4300 Laundry Service 232.85 PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 232.85 Powder Coating Technologies 04/17/2020 101-1550-4300 Service 2,795.00 Powder Coating Technologies 2,795.00 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 04/10/2020 101-1370-4530 March 2020 Service 320.00 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 04/10/2020 700-0000-4530 March 2020 Service 40.00 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 04/10/2020 701-0000-4530 March 2020 Service 40.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/21/2020 - 2:30 PM)Page 4 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 400.00 Reese Isiah 04/10/2020 101-1541-3634 Lakeside Pavillion Reservation Refund 125.00 Reese Isiah 125.00 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 04/10/2020 701-0000-4150 Paint 469.02 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 469.02 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 04/10/2020 101-1170-4510 Parts 14.99 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 04/10/2020 101-1220-4510 Parts 4.49 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 19.48 Sioux Valley Environmental 04/17/2020 700-7019-4530 Misc Spare Parts 750.00 Sioux Valley Environmental 750.00 SM HENTGES & SONS 04/10/2020 605-6502-4751 CSAH 101 From Pioneer Trail to Flying Cloud 252,018.65 SM HENTGES & SONS 252,018.65 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 04/17/2020 400-4126-4703 Additional Webrook Clients - Laptops 64.20 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 64.20 Southwest Suburban Publishing 04/10/2020 101-1410-4340 Advertising 37.35 Southwest Suburban Publishing 04/10/2020 101-1310-4340 Advertising 135.80 Southwest Suburban Publishing 173.15 Stryker Medical 04/17/2020 400-4127-4705 Medical Supplies 12,672.74 Stryker Medical 12,672.74 Swanson Jacqueline 04/17/2020 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 50.00 Swanson Jacqueline 50.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 04/17/2020 101-1350-4565 Light Repair 9,240.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 04/17/2020 400-0000-4510 Light Repair - Salt Shed 3,100.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 12,340.00 TFORCE FINAL MILE 04/10/2020 700-0000-4330 Postage 51.72 TFORCE FINAL MILE 51.72 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1120-4040 LTD - Apri 72.58 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1130-4040 LTD - Apri 50.38 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1160-4040 LTD - Apri 27.53 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1250-4040 LTD - Apri 110.48 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1310-4040 LTD - Apri 74.50 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1320-4040 LTD - Apri 124.10 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1370-4040 LTD - Apri 47.33 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/21/2020 - 2:30 PM)Page 5 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1520-4040 LTD - Apri 36.11 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1530-4040 LTD - Apri 15.05 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1560-4040 LTD - Apri 12.59 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1600-4040 LTD - Apri 26.02 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1700-4040 LTD - Apri 2.89 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1550-4040 LTD - Apri 104.74 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1420-4040 LTD - Apri 83.36 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1430-4040 LTD - Apri 5.00 The Hartford 04/10/2020 210-0000-4040 LTD - Apri 18.67 The Hartford 04/10/2020 720-7201-4040 LTD - Apri 5.90 The Hartford 04/10/2020 720-7202-4040 LTD - Apri 5.90 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1170-4040 LTD - Apri 12.87 The Hartford 04/10/2020 101-1220-4040 LTD - Apri 44.02 The Hartford 04/10/2020 701-0000-4040 LTD - Apri 78.45 The Hartford 04/10/2020 700-0000-4040 LTD - Apri 103.42 The Hartford 04/10/2020 720-0000-4040 LTD - Apri 42.04 The Hartford 1,103.93 THEIS CONSTRUCTION CO 04/17/2020 400-0000-4510 Trench Drain Removal & Repacement 46,122.56 THEIS CONSTRUCTION CO 46,122.56 Thomas Matthew 04/10/2020 720-7204-4901 2020 Waterwise Rebate 100.00 Thomas Matthew 100.00 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 04/17/2020 420-0000-4751 Fence Repair 2,100.00 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 2,100.00 TRI STATE BOBCAT INC 04/17/2020 700-0000-4120 Backpack Sprayer 359.90 TRI STATE BOBCAT INC 359.90 Tri-S Contstruction Supply, LLC 04/10/2020 701-0000-4551 Manhole Adj Rings 979.26 Tri-S Contstruction Supply, LLC 979.26 Turpin Pamela 04/17/2020 101-1260-4240 CSO Embroidery 152.00 Turpin Pamela 152.00 VALLEY-RICH CO INC 04/17/2020 700-0000-4552 Medical Arts Center 14,976.84 VALLEY-RICH CO INC 14,976.84 Visu-Sewer Inc 04/17/2020 720-7025-4751 CCTV Storm 1,365.00 Visu-Sewer Inc 1,365.00 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 04/10/2020 400-4003-4706 Waste Service - Main Fire Station 303.72 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 04/10/2020 101-1190-4350 Waste Service - Library 240.59 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 04/10/2020 101-1370-4350 Waste Service - Public works 121.48 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 04/10/2020 700-0000-4350 Waste Service - Public works 15.18 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 04/10/2020 701-0000-4350 Waste Service - Public works 15.18 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/21/2020 - 2:30 PM)Page 6 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 04/10/2020 720-0000-4350 Waste Service - Public works 477.99 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 04/10/2020 101-1220-4350 Waste Service - West Fire Station 30.38 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 04/10/2020 101-1170-4350 Waste Service - City Hall 205.66 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 04/10/2020 101-1220-4350 Waste Service - Main Fire Station 77.97 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1,488.15 675,141.53 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/21/2020 - 2:30 PM)Page 7 of 7 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 04/21/2020 - 2:32 PM Name Check Da Account Description Amount AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING 04/10/2020 601-6047-4752 2020 Pavement Improvements - CP 20-05 41,265.63 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING 41,265.63 Apadana LLC 04/10/2020 400-0000-4706 Lighting Project 23,774.15 Apadana LLC 23,774.15 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 04/17/2020 101-1120-4300 Health Insurance 60.35 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 04/17/2020 101-0000-2012 Health Insurance 26.00 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 86.35 BERGERSON CASWELL INC 04/17/2020 700-0000-4550 Well #6 Sealing 8,887.50 BERGERSON CASWELL INC 8,887.50 BOLTON & MENK INC 04/17/2020 601-6045-4300 Chan/Powers blvd & Lake Lucy Road - Project PW031A 7,044.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 7,044.00 Boyer Ford Trucks 04/17/2020 101-1320-4140 Parts 127.80 Boyer Ford Trucks 127.80 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 04/10/2020 101-1140-4302 Legal Services 17,402.21 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 17,402.21 Carver County 04/10/2020 101-1210-4300 1st Quarter 2020 Police Contract 18,608.60 Carver County 18,608.60 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 04/10/2020 101-1220-4320 Solar Energy Invoice 94.49 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 04/10/2020 101-1350-4320 Solar Energy Invoice 2,467.19 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 04/10/2020 101-1540-4320 Solar Energy Invoice 277.44 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 04/10/2020 101-1550-4320 Solar Energy Invoice 295.45 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 04/10/2020 101-1600-4320 Solar Energy Invoice 22.66 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 04/10/2020 700-0000-4320 Solar Energy Invoice 86.79 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 04/10/2020 700-7019-4320 Solar Energy Invoice 1,380.60 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 04/10/2020 701-0000-4320 Solar Energy Invoice 1,006.75 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 5,631.37 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC 04/17/2020 101-1320-4120 Guardian 325.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (04/21/2020 - 2:32 PM)Page 1 of 5 Name Check Da Account Description Amount CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC 325.00 ELECTRIC PUMP INC 04/17/2020 701-0000-4530 Pump 3,425.46 ELECTRIC PUMP INC 04/17/2020 701-0000-4530 Pump 3,425.46 ELECTRIC PUMP INC 6,850.92 Emergency Response Solutions 04/10/2020 101-1220-4530 SCBA Flow Test 77.07 Emergency Response Solutions 77.07 Engel Water Testing Inc 04/10/2020 700-0000-4300 Water Samples 500.00 Engel Water Testing Inc 500.00 FASTENAL COMPANY 04/17/2020 101-1350-4120 Pink Flagging Tape 23.66 FASTENAL COMPANY 04/17/2020 101-1370-4260 Parts 236.24 FASTENAL COMPANY 04/17/2020 101-1550-4120 Parts 4.29 FASTENAL COMPANY 04/17/2020 101-1550-4120 Supplies 577.19 FASTENAL COMPANY 841.38 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 04/10/2020 400-0000-4300 Service Calls 398.25 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 398.25 Henning Professional Services, Inc 04/10/2020 605-6501-4300 TH101 - Project 14-08 1,618.50 Henning Professional Services, Inc 1,618.50 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 04/10/2020 401-0000-4706 Project 016-042 1,735.00 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 1,735.00 Indoor Landscapes Inc 04/10/2020 101-1170-4300 April Plant Service 187.00 Indoor Landscapes Inc 187.00 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/17/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 62.20 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/17/2020 101-1170-4120 Chair 413.00 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/10/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 86.22 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/10/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 40.81 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 602.23 KORTERRA INC 04/17/2020 701-0000-4150 Mobile App Fee 1,000.00 KORTERRA INC 1,000.00 LOCATORS AND SUPPLIES INC 04/17/2020 700-0000-4550 Paint 146.03 LOCATORS AND SUPPLIES INC 146.03 Marco Inc 04/10/2020 101-1170-4410 Printer 720.68 Marco Inc 04/10/2020 700-0000-4410 Printer 100.00 Marco Inc 04/10/2020 701-0000-4410 Printer 100.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (04/21/2020 - 2:32 PM)Page 2 of 5 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Marco Inc 04/10/2020 720-0000-4410 Printer 50.00 Marco Inc 970.68 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 101-1212-4350 Cleaning Supplies 22.64 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 101-1220-4120 Parts 125.43 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 101-1220-4290 Parts 120.54 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 101-1220-4350 Cleaning Supplies 35.46 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 101-1320-4120 Parts 21.47 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 101-1320-4140 Parts 12.59 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 101-1550-4120 Parts 415.25 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 101-1550-4260 Parts 84.58 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 101-1550-4510 Parts 33.42 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 700-0000-4150 Parts 61.64 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 700-0000-4260 Parts 92.60 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 700-7019-4150 Parts 9.79 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 700-7043-4150 Parts 127.22 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 04/10/2020 701-0000-4150 Parts 17.26 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 1,179.89 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/17/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Charges 5,148.74 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/17/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthly Charges 95.78 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/17/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Charges 68.22 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/17/2020 701-0000-4320 Monthly Charges 516.51 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/10/2020 101-1350-4320 Bluff Crk Blvd Lights 430.47 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/10/2020 101-1350-4320 Bluff Crk & Audubon Rd 58.52 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/10/2020 101-1350-4320 96th Street & St Hwy 101 Lights 83.10 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/10/2020 101-1350-4320 2151 Lyman Blvd 192.14 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 6,593.48 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 04/17/2020 701-0000-4140 Disc Brake Pad 83.31 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 04/17/2020 101-1370-4260 Work Light 111.98 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 04/17/2020 101-1220-4140 Oil Filter 24.59 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 04/17/2020 101-1550-4120 Filters 149.89 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 04/17/2020 101-1550-4140 Bolt 86.44 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 04/10/2020 101-1550-4120 Oil Filters 63.06 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 519.27 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 04/17/2020 101-1320-4140 Tires 473.15 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 04/17/2020 101-1320-4140 Tires 2,640.00 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 3,113.15 Potentia MN Solar 04/10/2020 700-0000-4320 Solar Energy Invoice 1,069.86 Potentia MN Solar 04/10/2020 101-1190-4320 Solar Energy Invoice 2,037.85 Potentia MN Solar 04/10/2020 101-1170-4320 Solar Energy Invoice 1,592.39 Potentia MN Solar 4,700.10 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 04/10/2020 720-7202-4300 Bluff Creek Prairie 800.00 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 800.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (04/21/2020 - 2:32 PM)Page 3 of 5 Name Check Da Account Description Amount PRECISE MRM LLC 04/17/2020 101-1320-4310 Flat Data Plan 300.00 PRECISE MRM LLC 300.00 Premium Waters, Inc 04/17/2020 101-1550-4120 Bottle water service 78.69 Premium Waters, Inc 78.69 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO 04/17/2020 101-1320-4120 Parts 145.66 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO 145.66 Standard Spring-Truck Suspension Parts 04/17/2020 701-0000-4140 Parts 1,427.92 Standard Spring-Truck Suspension Parts 1,427.92 STREICHER'S 04/17/2020 101-1260-4240 Equipment 219.91 STREICHER'S 219.91 SUMMIT COMPANIES 04/17/2020 101-1220-4300 Service Call for Fire Panel Trouble 300.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 300.00 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1120-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 33.36 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1130-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 23.23 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1160-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 12.53 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1250-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 50.32 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1310-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 42.94 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1320-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 47.08 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1370-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 20.83 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1520-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 16.80 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1530-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 6.82 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1560-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 5.76 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1600-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 11.93 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1700-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 1.33 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1550-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 47.06 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1420-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 38.22 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1430-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 2.28 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 210-0000-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 8.48 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 720-7201-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 2.69 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 720-7202-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 2.69 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1170-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 3.81 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-1220-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 20.45 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 701-0000-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 35.51 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 700-0000-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 46.92 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 720-0000-4040 Life Insurance - April 2020 19.25 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 101-0000-2011 Life Insurance - April 2020 652.84 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 210-0000-2011 Life Insurance - April 2020 6.29 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 700-0000-2011 Life Insurance - April 2020 125.56 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 701-0000-2011 Life Insurance - April 2020 125.56 Sun Life Financial 04/10/2020 720-0000-2011 Life Insurance - April 2020 9.31 Sun Life Financial 1,419.85 TCIC, Inc.04/17/2020 700-0000-4310 Fcc License 150.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (04/21/2020 - 2:32 PM)Page 4 of 5 Name Check Da Account Description Amount TCIC, Inc. 150.00 United Farmers Cooperative 04/10/2020 101-1550-4120 Hedge Trimmer 439.96 United Farmers Cooperative 439.96 UNITED WAY 04/10/2020 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00410.04.2020 United Way 30.40 UNITED WAY 30.40 VESSCO INC 04/17/2020 700-7043-4530 Parts 707.20 VESSCO INC 04/10/2020 700-7019-4530 Parts 365.98 VESSCO INC 1,073.18 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/10/2020 700-0000-4300 2019 GIS Specialist Support Services 2,517.20 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/10/2020 701-0000-4300 2019 GIS Specialist Support Services 2,517.20 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/10/2020 720-0000-4300 2019 GIS Specialist Support Services 2,517.20 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/10/2020 101-1310-4300 2019 GIS Specialist Support Services 2,517.20 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/10/2020 101-1320-4300 2019 GIS Specialist Support Services 2,517.20 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/10/2020 700-0000-4300 2020 GIS/AMS Support Services 747.30 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/10/2020 701-0000-4300 2020 GIS/AMS Support Services 747.30 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/10/2020 101-1310-4300 2020 GIS/AMS Support Services 747.30 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/10/2020 720-0000-4300 2020 GIS/AMS Support Services 747.30 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/10/2020 101-1320-4300 2020 GIS/AMS Support Services 747.30 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 16,322.50 WW GRAINGER INC 04/10/2020 101-1550-4120 Equipment 25.53 WW GRAINGER INC 04/17/2020 101-1550-4120 Supplies 403.65 WW GRAINGER INC 04/17/2020 101-1550-4120 Ladder 113.68 WW GRAINGER INC 542.86 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/10/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthly Charges- Parks 98.54 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/10/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Charges- Parks 28.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 126.54 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 04/17/2020 101-1320-4120 Supplies 1,383.88 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 1,383.88 178,946.91 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (04/21/2020 - 2:32 PM)Page 5 of 5 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 27, 2020 Subject Fire Department Update Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: J.2. Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No: SUMMARY Monthly Fire Department Update with response data from March 2020 ATTACHMENTS: Narrative Graphs and Charts TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Don Johnson, Fire Chief DATE: April 27, 2020 SUBJ: Monthly Fire Department Update Fire Department Staffing Department staffing is at 44 of 45 paid on-call firefighters. Only minor short duration illnesses have impacted two of the firefighters over the past two months. On March 20th, the fire department added COVID shifts additional to the regularly scheduled duty crews. In addition to 24/7 staffing, several other safeguards were put in place in an effort to ensure response, work in small teams, and put advanced scheduling in place for the pandemic. Fire Department Response The fire department responded to (65) calls for service in March. With the additional duty crew shifts, most calls after March 20th were responded to by a crew of 3. Additionally, flu like symptoms calls were not responded to if no other life safety issues existed. Call Breakdown for the month: • 0 Chief Only • 11 Day Only • 33 Duty Crew Only • 21 General Alarms Significant calls for January included the following: • (44) Rescue/EMS calls with (3) motor vehicle accidents. Monthly Training • Group rainings in March and April were canceled due to the COVID restrictions • On – Line Training and Duty Crew specific training for a new CPR device took place. Todd Gerhardt Fire Department Update Page 2 Other Activities • Most activities throughout March/April revolved around the COVID Pandemic. This included instituting 24/7 duty crews in station. On April 1, the budget approved Overnight Duty crew started at 10pm. • Stringent cleaning standards were put in place for each day with sign off sheets and accountability • The contractor finished the crew rooms in time for the overnight crews to start. • I was approved to work a rotating schedule at the State Emergency Operations Center which began on Monday, April 6th. I continued to work two days a week through April and am scheduled similar through the end of May at this point. Fire Marshal Council Update for March 2020 • Significant time spent planning and meeting with contractors and other duties associated with the fire station remodel. • Several inspections out at the new Holasek Business Park including allowing them to bring in medical supplies to assemble to help with the COVID-19 response. • Several inspections at the new Camp Tanadoona dining hall to try and get them open in time for campers this summer. • Completed fire inspections at the new Furnishare space in Market Square. They took over the space next to their existing store that had many previous fire code violations and was years of work in the process. • Provided a fire station tour and safety message to Minnetonka Schools Explorers Pre-School. Two classes of 40 kids each were able to tour the station and receive some fire department goodies to take home. Completed first week of March, before the outbreak and shut down. • Attended the State Fire Marshal Association quarterly meeting and training. • Fire Marshal Nutter assisted the City of Chaska and the Chaska Fire Department with interviews for their open Fire Inspector position. Fire Investigations No fire investigations to report on. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Jan Feb Mar 2020 Calls by Month and Type Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Alarm Calls Good Intent Call Hazardous Condition Service Call Fire 71 50 66 79 86 76 66 72 84 85 85 101 94 88 76 64 71 88 102 85 85 79 84 86 80 75 65 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Chanhassen Fire Department Calls By Month Comparison 2018 2019 Series8 691 690 753 921 1,002 885 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Projected Calls for Service by Year Rescue & Emergency Medical Service 64% Alarm Calls 11% Good Intent Call 11% Hazardous Condition 4% Service Call 5% Fire 5% 2020 Calls for Service by % of Call Type Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Alarm Calls Good Intent Call Hazardous Condition Service Call Fire CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 27, 2020 Subject Law Enforcement Update Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: J.3. Prepared By Lance Pearce, LieutenantCarver County Sheriff's Office File No: N/A SUMMARY ATTACHMENTS: Cover memo Quarter stats JanuaryMarch 2020 Quarter breakdown Page 1 Memo TO: Mayor Ryan; Council Members Tjornholm, McDonald, Campion and Coleman FROM: Lieutenant Lance Pearce DATE: April 22, 2020 RE: Law Enforcement Update/ First Quarter 2020 Attached are the agenda items for the City of Chanhassen council meeting April 27, 2020 for your review and consideration. 1. Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen January- March 2020 Quarter Calls for Service Summary; Group A, Group B, Non-Criminal, Traffic and Administrative. 2. Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen January- March 2020 Arrest Summary. 3. Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen January- March 2020 Citation Summary. 4. Training update: canceled due to pandemic Lieutenant Chanhassen Office January-March 2020 Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen Call for Service Total Activity=2329 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Felony Assault Felony Theft Drug Felony Other January-March 2020 Group A 115 29 1134 1051 Felony Misdemeanor Non Criminal Traffic January-March 2020 Types of Calls CFS=2329 0 50 100 150 200 250 January-March 2020 Non Criminal