Loading...
11-12-97 Minutes CHANHASSEN ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING November 12, 1997 Meeting called to order by Uli Sacchet at 7:10 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Leith, Susan Morgan, Uli Sacchet, Bill Coldwell, Jack Atkins, Maureen Farrell and Susan Markert MEMBERS ABSENT: Susan Wright, Greg Havlik STAFF PRESENT: Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Specialist APPROVAL OF MINUTES: No corrections to October minutes. Approved. RECYCLING INFO. PROJECT: Mr. Sacchet handed out samples of phone message outline and said there were three goals of the project - the phone line, development of a magnet, and a web page design. The phone message outline was reviewed by the Commission and found to be comprehensive. Uli also displayed a prototype of the magnet design. Discussion of the project included the following: -If there is a separate mailing for the magnet, Mr. Atkins approximated the cost to be $800. -To include the magnet in the newsletter, volunteers would have to manually stuff the magnets perhaps by putting magnet in envelope and stapling into newsletter. The commission could ask for a sponsor, such as United Mailing, to cover costs of mailing. Ms. Morgan volunteered to contact them. -Commission should research how Dakota County distributed their magnets. -All recycling information will be Chanhassen specific and needed since comprehensive information doesn’t exist for county. Hennepin and Dakota have comprehensive recycling books. -Fax on demand. Access should be included on phone line. -Need team effort to check and research information for project. Therefore each commissioner will take information item and research. Items divided as follows: Maureen #1, Andy #2, Jack #3, Uli #4, Bill #5, Ms. Morgan #6, Ms. Markert magnet design. -Cross-over of information to web page will be simple. GREEN BUILDER PROGRAM: Bill received more information from Austin, TX and Boulder CO. Austin’s program has evolved and is implemented in other cities. How much effort is it? How many staff needed? What information can cross over from Austin’s program to Chanhassen? All were questions that still need to be answered. Major program will take great effort and details will really need to be researched. How to assign points for various ‘green’ aspects of a home? We could try to put together short, simple pamphlet and then figure out marketing campaign for pamphlet. Pamphlet would be used to gain educational awareness and give sources for more information. Since program is so detailed, we could possibly form consortium to help with developing program and obtaining information. Could also encourage building to do this rather than develop program. Who would be the target audience - residents or builders? Commission could create program simpler than Austin’s ‘green builder’ which would reward or recognize good lawn care practices, tree preservation in developments, etc. The Commission should keep Green Builder program in mind, but it is too in-depth for commission now. We should start with Realtors since they’re contacted first by homeowners. The question is, where will the best return for our effort be? We should use day-to-day advise and encourage good practices. The ‘green builder’ program is good because it’s more global, more than just Chanhassen and it would be good to be a part of a larger plan. The commission could create a simple list of ‘green’ questions for homebuyers, builders, residents, etc. Each commissioner should contemplate ‘green house’ packet - what should be included, how it should be presented and mailed i.e. informational brochure, pamphlet, booklet, etc. Environmental Commission Minutes November 12, 1997 Page 2 GOAL REVIEW : Commission favorites from list of possible 1998 goals attached in November packet included: ? Identify what is special to Chanhassen and educate residents about it before it’s destroyed. ? Address loss of wildlife. ? Suggested species list for planting in yards. Wetland species, tree species, prairie, butterfly, etc. ? Compile list of recommendations of what residents can do to improve their environment/neighborhood. ? Survey residents, commissioners, and/or city council to determine environmental concerns and ‘hot topics’. ? Arbor Day celebration Discussion to be continued… Meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Prepared and Submitted by Jill Sinclair g:/plan/js/ec/11-12-97MIN