Loading...
Chapter 08 WaterCity of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan203 Chapter 8Water City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan204 8.1 | Introduction Current and projected growth and development in Chanhassen, has created a need for improvements to the water system in order to meet anticipated water demands. The water distribution system has been expanded and improved in the decade since the last comprehensive water plan was completed. Now, the water system can be re-evaluated in light of recent improvements and the need for water system improvements can be re-evaluated. The updated water system model can be used to analyze demands, available supply capacity and storage, and available flow rates and pressures throughout the distribution system. For this purpose, SEH has updated the city’s existing water system plan with water main, PRV, treatment and storage improve-ments that have occurred since the last model update. Additionally, we have processed updated demand data to geo-located water demands in the system so that they are modeled in the area of occurrence. Furthermore, regions of future development expected to create additional system demands were identified with the help of city staff, along with potential water system improvements that will allow the system to meet these expected demands. The computer model was updated using WaterGEMS v8i. The resulting product is a tool that can be used for hy- draulic analysis of the water system and scenario planning. The model can also be built-upon in the future if so desired to analyze water chemistry/water quality throughout the distribution system. In recent years, the city has utilized the model as a valuable tool for:»Identification of future locations of critical supply and storage facilities so land can be purchased and/or set aside before development begins in the designated area. »Provide a long range plan for water system upgrades/expansion so that proposed construction projects include properly sized water mains to allow for future development needs. »Identify deficiencies in the water system and corresponding improvements to reduce or eliminate these deficiencies. 8.2 | Existing Facilities The Chanhassen water system is composed of storage, supply, treatment and distribution components as described in the following paragraphs. Storage, supply and treatment facilities are listed in the tables below. Storage Storage facilities on a water system allow a more constant supply during variable demand conditions. During high demands when water customers are using a greater volume of water, part of that demand can be met by storage reserves in addition to direct pumping from wells. During low demand conditions, the well pumps can continue to operate with excess supply going to fill storage for later withdrawal. In addition to this operational function, storage tanks can serve as an emergency water source in the case of a supply failure (i.e. power outage, well maintenance, etc.); they also increase the amount of water available during a fire; and they stabilize water system pressures. 8 | ComprehensiveWater System Plan City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan205 Facility Pressure Zone Volume (MG) Useable Volume (MG) Overflow Elevation (ft) Style Arboretum Low 1.50 1.50 1120 Fluted Column - Elevated Lake Lucy Low 3.50 1.75 1120 Steel-Ground Storage Tank Minnetonka Middle School -West High 0.75 0.75 1200 Composite - Elevated East WTP Clearwell Low 0.20 0.20 NA Concrete - Below Grade Storage Capacity 5.95 4.20 Table 8.1 | Existing Water Storage Facilities Source: City Records Supply and Treatment Raw (untreated) water is currently supplied to Chanhassen by means of 12 wells as listed in Table 8.2. These wells utilize the Prairie Du Chien – Jordan aquifer with the exception of wells 5, 6 and 11, which draw water from the glacial drift aquifer. Of these 12 wells, seven pump into the east water treatment plant with the remainder pumping groundwater directly into the distribution system. The treatment plant uses a gravity filtration process to remove iron and manganese from the groundwater. Of the wells pumping directly into the distribution system, wells 3, 15 and 9 pump into the main pressure zone, while wells 7 and 8 pump into the high zone. These wells will eventually feed the new west water treatment plant. Due to a reduction in capacity, wells 5 and 6 were deactivated in 2008 and are not included in the well summary. The firm well pumping capacity is that which can be supplied reliably even during maintenance activities or an emergency situation where the largest well pump might be out of service. This figure is often used for design and planning purposes, since it represents a worst-case scenario. The total operational supply capacity for Chanhassen is currently 10,600 gpm assuming the well capacities shown in Table 8.2 while the “firm” supply capacity is 9,350 gpm. The east water treatment plant has a filtration capacity of 6,000 gpm as is noted in Table 8.3. There are four high service pumps that draw from the clearwell at the treatment plant, each with a capacity of 2,000 gpm. Therefore, the firm pumping capacity of the plant is 6,000 gpm. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan206 Table 8.2 | Existing Water Production Wells Table 8.3 | Water Treatment Facilities Well Name Pressure Zone Theoretical Capacity Operational Capacity (gpm) Operational Capacity (MGD) Treatment Well 3 Main 1,000 800 1.2 Well 7 High 1,350 1,000 1.4 Well 8 High 1,300 1,000 1.4 Well 9 Main 1,000 750 1.1 Well 15 Main 1,100 1,000 1.4 Well 2 Main 1,000 700 1.0 Well 4 Main 1,100 850 1.2 Well 10 Main 1,200 700 1.0 Well 11 Main 500 100 0.1 Well 12 Main 1,450 1,250 1.8 Well 13 Main 1,400 1,200 1.7 Well 14 Main 1,450 1,250 1.8 Total Well Capacity 10,600 15.3 Firm Well Capacity 9,350 13.8 Total Treated Well Capacity 6,050 8.7 Firm Well Capacity (Treated)4,800 6.9 Treatment Capacity 6,000 8.6 Source: City Records Source: City Records Facility Pressure Zone Max. Operational Capacity (gpm) Max. Operational Capacity (MGD) East W ater Treatment Plant Main 6,000 8.6 W est W ater Treatment Plant Main 6,000 8.6 Anticipated Treatment Capacity 12,000 17.3 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan207 Distribution System The Chanhassen water system is comprised of water mains ranging in size from 6 inches to 24 inches in diameter. The system has been designed with larger trunk main loops with smaller branch mains. The system serves an elevation range of approximately 850 feet to 1080 feet. Pressures in the distribution system are correlated with elevations with properties at higher elevations receiving lower pressure and vice-versa. Because services at relatively high elevations have unacceptably low pressures when served by the low pressure zone, a high pressure zone has been created in the northwestern part of the city, east of Lake Minnewashta. This pressure zone is served by separate wells and a storage tank as discussed in the preceding sections. Water from the high zone can also serve demand on the low zone by passing through pressure reducing valves (PRVs) on the distribution system. These PRVs are shown in Appendix A - Figure 1. Under normal conditions, the PRVs between the high and low pressure zone remain closed. Additional PRVs are located throughout the system and maintain system pressure to the other low pressure zones. As noted earlier, areas of low land elevation have higher pressures in relation to the existing water storage tanks. When pressures exceed 80-90 psi, it is recommended to reduce these pressures to more usable levels. The Lake Riley, Inter Bluff and Lower bluff pressure zones are all service areas with lower land elevations. These areas have PRVs regulating pressure within the zone. Some of the pressure zones identified for future service have in ground vaults ready for installation of PRVs when additional development requires. Table 8.4 below provides a list of existing system PRVs and their operational status. Table 8.4 | Existing PRV Station Facility Inlet Pressure Zone/HGL Outlet Pressure Zone Number of Valves Valve Sizes (dia.,inch) Housing Status Camden Low Inter Bluff 4.00 Concrete BG Active HWY7 & 41 High Low 3.00 2,4,6 Active 101& 96th Low Inter Bluff 1.00 12 Not Active Kiowa Low Lake Rielly 3.00 12,3,1.5 Concrete Active Lyman & Springfield Low Lake Rielly 1.00 12 Concrete Active Monk Ct Low Lake Rielly 3.00 12,3,1.5 Concrete Active Pioneer Pass Low Inter Bluff 1.00 12,3,1.5 Concrete Not Active Powers Low Inter Bluff 1.00 12,3,1.5 Concrete Active Foxwood Low Inter Bluff 1.00 12,3,1.5 Concrete Active Source: City Records 8.3 | Current Water Demand Trends Chanhassen water utility records indicate that in 2016 the average daily (AD) water demand for the complete system was 2,570,000 gallons (1,783 gpm). The maximum day (MD) demand for 2016 was 6,200,000 gallons (4,328 gpm). Table 8.5 presents water demands in Chanhassen from 2007 to 2016. The average day demands over this period are also presented in graphical format in the Figure 8.1. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan208 Table 8.5 | Recent Historical Average Water Use Average Day Water Sold Water Pumped ResidentialCommercialIndustrialOtherTotalAverage Day Pumped(MGD)Per Capita Water Pumped(gpd)Unaccounted Water (%)2007 23,066 1.95 0.31 0.21 0.02 2.49 3.12 135.3 20% 2008 23,578 2.02 0.38 0.24 0.04 2.67 3.22 136.6 17% 2009 24,481 2.27 0.45 0.43 0.07 3.21 3.64 148.8 12% 2010 24,699 1.89 0.46 0.26 0.06 2.66 2.70 109.2 1% 2011 23,179 2.05 0.42 0.23 0.06 2.76 2.83 122.3 3% 2012 23,484 2.38 0.48 0.29 0.08 3.23 3.26 138.8 1% 2013 23,840 2.09 0.44 0.26 0.05 2.85 2.88 120.7 1% 2014 24,432 1.85 0.30 0.21 0.18 2.54 2.64 108.2 4% 2015 24,951 1.83 0.38 0.23 0.06 2.50 2.54 101.7 2% 2016 25,332 1.73 0.31 0.17 0.29 2.50 2.57 101.4 3% Average 2.05 0.42 0.27 0.08 2.82 2.94 122.29 4% Average Per Capita Water Use (gpd) 83.19 16.27 10.48 3.78 113.72 % of Total 73% 15% 10% 3% Source: DNR Water Use Records, City RecordsYearPopulation City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan209 Figure 8.1 | Recent Historical Average Water Use 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 19971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016Average Day Demand (gpd)Year 8.4 | Peaking Demand Factors Peaking factors are ratios to the average day demand rate which are used in analysis of water systems. They are representative of temporal variation in water demands. A maximum day peaking factor for a water system is the ratio of the MD demand rate to the AD demand rate. It normally indicates the magnitude of seasonal differences in water demands. For example, if demands on a system increase substantially during the summer due to lawn irrigation, the peaking factors will also be large. Typical MD peaking factors range from 2.0 to 3.0. Larger systems generally have lower maximum day peaking factors. However, predominantly residential municipal- ities, especially in metropolitan areas, generally have higher peaking factors due to lawn irrigation demands. Recent MD peaking factors for Chanhassen are shown in Table 8.6. From the peak demand information that was available, it can be seen that the seasonal demand pattern in Chanhassen is within the typical range. This historical information is useful, not only to assess the capacity of existing water system facilities, but also to an- ticipate future needs. For future demand projections, a MD peaking factor of 3.1 was assumed in this report, which was the highest of the previous fifteen years.Population City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan210 Table 8.6 | Recent Historical Max Day Water Use and Peak Factors Year Average Day (MGD) Maximum Day (MGD) Maximum Day (gpm) Maximum Day to Average Day Ratio (Peak Factor) 2002 2.4 5.1 3,527 2.2 2003 3.0 8.9 6,169 3.0 2004 2.6 5.9 4,093 2.2 2005 2.7 7.8 5,396 2.9 2006 3.2 9.8 6,803 3.1 2007 3.1 9.2 6,392 3.0 2008 3.2 8.5 5,926 2.7 2009 3.6 8.3 5,771 2.3 2010 2.7 6.4 4,410 2.4 2011 2.8 6.7 4,618 2.3 2012 3.3 7.9 5,503 2.4 2013 2.9 7.4 5,146 2.6 2014 2.6 7.2 4,979 2.7 2015 2.5 6.3 4,391 2.5 2016 2.6 6.2 4,328 2.4 15 Yr. Average 2.9 7.4 5,163 2.6 15 Yr. Max 3.6 9.8 6,802.8 3.1 Source: DNR Water Use Records, City Records City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan211 Table 8.7 | Historical Average Day & Per Capita Water Use Year Total Population Average Day Water Pumped (MGD) Average Day per capita Water Use (gpd) 2000 20,321 2.4 119.6 2001 20,982 2.7 126.8 2002 21,561 2.4 109.0 2003 22,376 3.0 132.7 2004 23,431 2.6 112.7 2005 23,652 2.7 113.3 2006 23,864 3.2 132.0 2007 23,506 3.1 132.7 2008 23,153 3.2 139.1 2009 22,806 3.6 159.6 2010 22,952 2.7 117.2 2011 23,179 2.8 122.1 2012 23,484 3.3 138.8 2013 23,954 2.9 120.1 2014 24,388 2.6 108.4 *2015 25,194 2.5 100.7 *2016 25,194 2.6 101.9 5 Year Average 2.8 114.0 5 -Year Max 3.6 138.8 *State Demographer population estimate for 2015 Source: DNR Water Use Records, City Records 8.5 | Demand Distribution Water demands are variable throughout the day and the year. On an annual basis, the heaviest demand conditions (maximum day demands) occur during the summer, when residential irrigation and other outdoor water use activi- ties increase. Water demands also vary over the course of a given day. Figure 8.2 represents the results of typical hourly demand distribution graph for total water use in the City of Chanhassen. This was calculated for a typical average day as well as a maximum day. For comparison purposes, a typical curve developed by the America Water Works Association (AWWA) for residential water use is also included on the graph as a reference. In general, commercial and industrial water uses are typically more constrained and predictable. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan212 All three curves depict low water demand during the early morning periods. It shows increasing demand during the day with a slight decrease in the late morning periods. By late afternoon, demands level off then increase again during the evening hours, likely when residents are home and utilizing more water. As can be seen in the figure, for the peak day data, the peak hour occurs earlier in the morning, this is likely due to automated irrigation within the city for both commercial and residential customers. As discussed briefly in Section 8.2, storage reservoirs are used to supplement the supply of treated water during the peak usage hours within each day. During the early morning periods when demand is low, the system is able to produce water in excess of the demand. This excess is used to fill the storage reservoirs. When the demand rate exceeds the production rate, stored water in the reservoirs is used to make up for the deficit. The storage reservoirs will start to fill when the demand decreases below the total supply capacity. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 130% 140% 150% 160% 170% 180% 190% 200% 210% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25Demand %Hour Typical Average Water Use Day - Chanhassen, MN Typical Water Peak Use Day - Chanhassen, MN AWWA 8.6 | Analysis of the Existing Water System All utility-owned pipes 4 inches in diameter and larger were included in the computer model of the distribution sys- tem. Water pumping records from 2016 were used to represent current demands on the system. Storage and supply facilities were modeled based on specifications supplied by city staff. Additional calibration can be conducted in the future, after construction of short-term water system improvements, to improve its accuracy for future use. Figure 8.2 | Typical Hourly Demand City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan213 System Pressure Calculations Pressures in the future system under average day demands were calculated by the computer model. Due to the elevation changes in Chanhassen and the creation of separate pressure zones, the pressures in the system are highly variable. The model calculates pressures in the range of 40 – 110 psi throughout the existing water system. Higher pressures exist on the southern and eastern parts of the distribution system, where elevations are relatively low, with the exception of the reduced pressure zone around Lake Riley. In this zone, the pressure is maintained at a lower level through the use of pressure reduction valves. Industry standard recommends that the normal working pressure in water distribution systems be approximately in the range of 50 to 80 psi and not less than 35 psi. In addition, pressures in excess of 100 psi in the distribution sys- tem should be reuced by pressure reducing valves. The Minnesota Plumbing Code requires that building plumbing systems not exceed 80 psi. Many of the areas with pressures greater than 100 psi are localized on the system (they are limited to the fringes of the existing distribution system). Expansion of the distribution system to the south will require the use of pressure reducing valves as discussed later in this report. Where pressures exceed 80 psi, individual homes or businesses should install pressure reducing valves on the service line near the entrance to the building, as recommended by the Minnesota Plumbing Code. Lake Lucy Road and Powers Boulevard – Analysis of Low Pressures During High Demand Conditions As reported by city staff and mentioned in the previous comprehensive water plan, pressures in the area around the Lake Lucy Reservoir are low during peak demands. This effect is also observed in the computer model. Areas of relatively high elevations are present in the area. Elevations range from about 960 feet in the vicinity of the inter- section of Lake Lucy Road and Powers Boulevard to approximately 1040 feet in certain locations. Most of the high elevations are found on the south and east side of the intersection. It appears from the computer modeling results that there are about 50 homes that may drop below 35 psi during high demands when levels in the Lake Lucy Reservoir are low. If levels in the reservoir drop to 50% of capacity, that cor-responds to a water elevation of 1105 feet (15 feet below overflow). At this level, any water service above an eleva-tion of about 1024 feet would drop below 35 psi. As stated previously, industry standard recommends that pressures remain about 35 psi under normal operating conditions, which includes periods of relatively high demand. Since this is primarily an elevation issue, distribution system replacements or upgrades are not expected to have a significant effect in improving pressures in the area. The following three options are presented here for dealing with this pressure issue: »Do nothing. The pressures do not appear to be critically low, and residents have adapted to conditions as they are. »Install individual booster pumps on homes that require higher pressure. »Create a small boosted pressure zone. A small booster station operating on a closed system is possible in the area. The city would need to conduct a detailed study of the issue to determine the optimal way to create such a system while maintaining circulation in the water system to prevent stagnation and the creation of dead ends that would limit fire protection capabilities. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan214 Pressure Zone Analysis As part of the comprehensive water plan update, the establishment of the pressure zone boundaries was revisited. Since the last comprehensive water plan was completed, pressure reducing valves/vaults have been installed as the system has expanded, which in turn define the boundaries of the pressure zones. As the system evolves, it is gener- ally a good idea to revisit the pressure zone development, identify potential changes and review improvements so the ultimate system provided is optimized. For example, the previous plan identified potential options for definition of the pressure zones. Now that a new water main has been installed and pressure reducing valve vaults have been placed, this boundary had changed slightly. As part of this update, a system wide contour map was updated to show parcels of land that can be served by the various pressure zones (see Appendix A - Figure A1). The high and low pressure zones are defined by the elevated water storage tanks that exist in these zones, with HGL’s of 1200 feet and 1120 feet respectively, these tanks maintain pressures of 40-80 psi to the majority of the service areas. The boundary of the high pressure zone has been clearly defined and does not have a very high potential to be changed or modified in the future. The low/main pressure zone, which is essentially the default pressure zone for the majority of the system, serves the remaining areas with the exception of the Lake Riley Pressure zone which is essentially a reduced pressure zone, served by PRVs from the main zone. In the past, this type of pressure zone had issues with large changes in flow. For example, when hydrants are flowed in this zone and shut off, pressure tends to bounce and transients are not very easily dissipated. This had resulted in water main breaks and water heater failure in some homes. In general, closed water pressure zones (without elevated storage or a standpipe) can experience difficulty with ma- jor flow changes as water is not compressible. When a valve is suddenly shut off (or a PRV throttled back), the wa- ter flowing in a corresponding pipe is suddenly forced to stop. Because of this, high pressure builds up immediately behind the shut off valve and low pressure forms in front of it. The momentum of the water is suddenly transferred into the physical system piping. As a result, a high-pressure region of water “piles up” in the pipe. This high pressure region then travels back along the pipe in the form of a wave. The border of the high-pressure zone is referred to as a pressure wave or transient. Such a pressure wave only exists for a short period of time, but can cause damage to piping and fittings. Transients are not very well understood and are not always accounted for in the design of a water distribution system. A previous comprehensive water plan identified five potential alternate water pressure zones, with two of the zones (Lake Riley and Interbluff) having similar hydraulic grade lines. In light of recent development and construction of new PRV facilities, a new pressure zone configuration was developed. The primary goal of the pressures zone restructuring was to sustain ideal pressures at all service elevations, simplify zone configurations and reduce the number of PRVs required to sustain pressure. Available Fire Flow Available fire flows were calculated using the computer model with a residual pressure of 20 psi. According to the American Water Works Association (AWWA), the minimum fire flow available at any given point in a system should not be less than 500 gpm at a residual pressure of 20 psi. This minimum criterion represents the amount of water required to provide for two standard hose streams on a fire in a typical residential area for residential dwell- ings with spacing greater than 100 feet. The distance between buildings and the corresponding recommended fire flow for residential areas is summarized in Table 8.8. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan215 Table 8.8 | Typical Fire Flow Requirements Land Use Building Separation (feet) Available fire flow @ 20 psi (gpm) Single & Two Family Residential >100 500 Single & Two Family Residential 30-100 750 Single & Two Family Residential 11-30 1,000 Single & Two Family Residential <10 1,500 Multiple Family Residential Complexes -2,000 to 3,000+ Average Density Commercial -1,500 to 2,500+ High Value Commercial -2,500 to 3,500+ Light Industrial -2,000 to 3,500 Heavy Industrial -2,500 to 3,500+ Source: Insurance Services Office For commercial and industrial buildings, the needed fire flow rate varies considerably and is based on several characteristics of individual buildings such as: »Type of construction »Type of business that is using the property (occupancy) »Proximity and characteristics of nearby properties »Presence or absence of a fire sprinkling system While the fire flow requirements of commercial and industrial properties should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, a general rule of thumb is that a municipal water system should aim to provide 3,500 gpm to this type of land use. The Insurance Services Office (ISO), in determining a City’s fire insurance classification, only considers flow rates up to 3,500 gpm. Available fire flows throughout the Chanhassen water system are highly variable due primarily to topographical changes. Available flow rates in the model range from about 500 gpm in some locations to greater than 5,000 gpm in others. Areas of potential concern include commercial, industrial or high-density residential land uses where the available flow rate at the water main is less than 3,500 gpm. The previous comprehensive water plan identified three distinct locations that had less than desirable available fire flow, as calculated by the water model. Since the previ- ous evaluation, improvements to the water system, including a new water tower have strengthened the water system. Subsequently, the areas of concern in relation to limited fire flow have been remedied. In short, major fire flow deficiencies were not identified as part of this analysis. However, this evaluation is not intended as a comprehensive building by building fire flow analysis, rather a comparison of computer modeling results with land uses across the existing water distribution system. 8.7 | Analysis of the Existing Water System Future sales and pumpage projections can be based on assumptions of water demands that can be expected accord- ing to future land use or population data. Two different means for water use demand projections are documented and compared below. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan216 Projected Water Demands - By Projected Population Previously in this report, per capita average day water use was calculated. The maximum for this figure for the past 5 years was found to be 139 gallons per day per person. This figure was then multiplied by projected population data. The resulting projected water average and max day demand data is shown below in Table 8.9. Table 8.9 | Projected Water Consumption - By Population Year Population Average Day Per Capita Water Pumped (gal) Average Day Water Pumped (MGD) Maximum Day to Average Day Ratio Projected Maximum Day Water Demand (MGD) Projected Maximum Day Water Demand (gpm) Projected Main Zone Maximum Day Water Demand (gpm) Projected High Zone Maximum Day Water Demand (gpm) 2015 24,655 3.4 10.6 7,389 6,429 961 2020 26,700 3.7 11.5 8,002 6,962 1,040 2025 29,200 4.1 12.6 8,752 7,614 1,138 2030 31,700 4.4 13.7 9,501 8,266 1,235 2035 34,400 4.8 14.8 10,310 8,970 1,340 2040 37,100 5.1 16.0 11,119 9,674 1,446 Source: DNR Water Use Records, State demographer, Met Council Thrive 2040 Forecast Projected Water System Demands - By Future Land Use The city’s comprehensive plan developed a projected land use map. This map provides for an assumption of future land uses for planning purposes. This projected map also provides for an opportunity to compare the change in land use acreage from exiting uses to projected uses. This information can then be utilized to estimate future water usage based on associated land use changes. Table 8.10 below documents land use changes estimated in the city’s most recent comprehensive plan and equated existing average day water use to existing land use. The estimate of average day water use per acre developed from historical data is then applied to future land use estimates. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan217 Table 8.10 | Projected Additional Water Consumption - Future Land Use Upper Main Pressure Zone Development Land use Total Acres Res. Units per Acre Units Pers. per Unit Demand per Person (gpd) Demand per Acre (gpd) Projected AD Demand (gpd) Projected AD Demand (MGD) Projected MD Demand (MGD) Residential Medium Density (RMD) 260.0 8 2.5 100 2,000 390,000 0.39 1.2 Residential Large Lot (RLL)120.0 0.4 2.5 100 100 9,000 0.01 0.0 Residential Low Density (RLD)680.0 4 2.5 100 1,000 510,000 0.51 1.6 Residential High Density (RHD)40.0 16 2.5 100 4,000 120,000 0.12 0.4 Office / Industrial 200.0 2,000 300,000 0.30 0.9 Office 60.0 2,000 90,000 0.09 0.3 Mixed Use 21.5 3,000 48,285 0.05 0.1 Commercial 0.9 2,000 1,380 0.00 0.0 Existing Residential to Connect to W ater System (REX) 0.0 411 2.5 100 102,750 0.10 0.3 Totals for Upper Main Zone 1,571,415 1.6 4.9 Low Area Planned Development Land Use Total Developable Acres Res. Units per Acre Units Pers. per Unit Demand per Person (gpd) Demand per Acre (gpd) Projected AD Demand (gpd) Projected AD Demand (MGD) Projected MD Demand (MGD) Residential Large Lot (RRL)78 2.5 100 19,500 0.02 0.1 Residential Low Density (RLD)39 2.5 100 9,750 0.01 0.0 Residential Low Density (RLD)162 2 2.5 100 500 81,000 0.08 0.3 Residential High Density (RHD)33.2 12 2.5 100 3,000 99,600 0.10 0.3 Office 53.4 1,500 80,100 0.08 0.2 Office Industrial 61 1,500 91,500 0.09 0.3 *Existing Gedney Demands 180,000 0.18 0.6 Totals for Low Area 561,450 0.56 1.74 Totals for Main Pressure Zone 2,132,865 2.13 6.61 High Zone Planned Development Land use Total Acres Res. Units per Acre Units Pers. per Unit Demand per Person (gpd) Demand per Acre(gpd) Projected AD Demand (gpd) Projected AD Demand (MGD) Projected MD Demand (MGD) Residential Low Density (RMD)40 4 2.5 125 50,000 0.05 0.2 Residential Med Density (RMD)19 8 2.5 125 47,500 0.05 0.1 Existing Residential Lots 49 2.5 125 15,313 0.02 0.0 Totals for High Zone 112,813 0.11 0.35 Total System (Additional Demand)2,245,678 2.25 6.96 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan218 Table 8.11 | Projected Water Consumption - By Land Use Area Existing Average Day (MGD) Future Land Use Average Day (MGD) Projected Maximum Day Water Use (MGD) Projected Maximum Day Water Use (gpm) Main Pressure Zone 2.50 2.13 14.37 9,982 High Pressure Zone 0.37 0.11 1.95 1,353 Total 2.88 2.25 16.32 11,335 Existing AD calculated from current 6-year average, Peak factor= 3.1 for main zone, 4.0 for high pressure zone, See table 8.10 for calculations 8.7 | Future Water System Facilities The city is currently planning the construction of new water system facilities to accommodate future water needs. In addition to normal water uses, system facilities are often sized for fire protection needs, including addi-tional storage facilities, water tanks and supply. Facilities (wells and a future west water treatment plant) and water mains are planned to expand and improve water delivery. The following sections of this report discuss the estimated need for future water system facilities, based on the demand projections presented in Table 8.11. Future Distribution System In Appendix A - Figure 7, a proposed trunk water main layout has been drawn as part of the future water sys- tem vision. The future mains include 12-inch loops helping to balance the future water system by allowing large volumes of water to flow between supply, storage and points of use. These trunk main loops will be required to effectively transport water to the extremities of the proposed expansion areas. Looping is recommended wherev- er possible to minimize dead-ends in the water system. Dead-ends or branched water systems are less reliable since water must come from one direction. This forces the utility to shut off water to some customers during repairs or maintenance. In addition, larger head losses (or pressure losses) are experienced on dead-ends than on looped systems. This can limit available flow rates during fire protec- tion activities. In addition to future system improvements, the existing system could be improved by eliminating dead ends that are relatively long or less than 8 inches in diameter. This work should be coordinated with future street replacement projects to reduce costs where possible. Due to the fact that much of the future service area on the south end of the city already contains residential devel- opment, it is difficult to provide trunk main looping to serve the proposed developments on the far south end of the future service area, such as those proposed between the Hennepin County Regional Trail Corridor and Flying Cloud Drive. The proposed distribution system serves these developments using long dead end mains for this reason. If possible, the city should consider looping these segments to improve system hydraulics. A connection may be possible on the eastern extent of the future main shown on Flying Cloud Drive to the proposed 12-inch main on Deerbrook Drive. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan219 Pressure Zones The Chanhassen water distribution system serves a range of elevations that prevents the entire system from being served on a single pressure zone. In order to keep pressures at acceptable levels throughout the system, there are currently three separate pressure zones in the system. The pressure zones are defined by different hydraulic grade, which allows pressures to remain in a more acceptable range. The pressure zone boundaries are shown on Appendix A - Figure 2. As part of the water comprehensive plan update, a review of the pressure zone boundaries was completed by ana- lyzing citywide land elevations with resulting reasonable pressures within each defined pressure zone. The result of this analysis is shown in Appendix A. In short, the current pressure zone plan could be optimized to simplify oper- ations. The map shown in Appendix A, Figure 8 is defined to show which pressure zone would be best suited to serve varying land elevations. In those areas that may have standard operating pressures that fall out of tolerance, individual PRVs could be installed if the water pressure in the street exceeds 80 psi. The largest zone is the low pressure zone, which is currently served by the east water treatment plant; wells 3, 4 and 9; and the Lake Lucy and Arboretum storage tanks. The hydraulic grade of this zone is determined by an overflow elevation of 1120 feet for the storage tanks. The high pressure zone is located roughly between Hazeltine Blvd. and Galpin Blvd., north of Arboretum Blvd. This zone is currently served by wells 7 and 8 and an elevated storage tank, Melody Hill, which has an overflow eleva- tion of 1200 feet. Future developments on the south end of town are at relatively low elevation compared with the rest of the city. As the distribution system expands into this area, the water pressure in the mains will need to be reduced through the use of pressure reducing valves, similar to the way in which the Lake Riley Pressure Zone is currently served. In light of recent development and construction of new PRV facilities, a new pressure zone configuration was de- veloped. The primary goal of the pressures zone restructuring was to sustain ideal pressures at all service elevations, simplify zone configurations and reduce the number of PRVs required. In the future, it appears that the existing Lake Riley Pressure Zone could be merged with the Interbluff Pressure Zone and served by a single elevated storage tank. Not only would this simplify system operations and reduce the reliance on PRV stations, but pressures in these zones would be sustained by a storage vessel which would ease pressure transients and better serve major changes in flow, reducing the possibility of pressure spikes. Appendix A - Figure 7, represents a potential location for an elevated storage tank for the new combined Interbluff/Lake Riley Pressure Zone. Future Supply Facilities Firm supply capacity, which is the amount of water that can be reliably supplied with the largest well out of service, should be greater than or equal to the maximum day demand. When projected maximum day demands reach firm capacity, it is an indication that additional water supply capacity is needed. The projected 2040 maximum day demand for Chanhassen is approximately 11,120 (16.0 MGD) gpm. As men- tioned in previous studies, the city should plan to serve the maximum day demand with firm capacity, defined here as the supply capacity with the largest distribution system well out of service and the largest well supplying the east water treatment plant out of service. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan220 The total system capacity with wells 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 and 14 will be 8,850 gpm. The firm capacity will be 7,450 gpm. To meet ultimate demand projections, there will be a well capacity need of approximately 3,700 (11,120 gpm – 7,450). Based on previous well capacities, that will equate to four additional wells to meet projected maxi- mum day demands. It is suggested that three additional wells serve the future west water plant while one additional well should be constructed to serve the east water treatment plant. Table 8.12 | Future Water System Supply Needs Year Maximum Day Water Pumped (MGD) Existing Firm Supply Capacity (MGD) Additional Supply Capacity Recommended (MGD) Additional Supply Capacity Recommended (gpm) Existing 5 Year Average 7.0 0.0 0 2020 11.5 0.8 552 2025 12.6 1.9 1,302 2030 13.7 3.0 2,051 2035 14.8 4.1 2,860 2040 16.0 5.3 3,669 10.7 Source: DNR Water Use Records, State demographer Future Storage Facilities In order to determine the water storage needs of a community, average daily demands, peak demands and emergen- cy needs must be considered. For many communities, fire protection needs tend to be the controlling factor when calculating needed storage volume. Table 8.13 shows the calculations used to determine future water storage volume requirements for the total system in Chanhassen. These calculations consider ultimate development of the proposed expansion areas. Water storage facilities should be able to supply the desired rate of fire flow for the required length of time during peak demands, when the water system is already impacted by other uses and with the largest pump out of service. The calculations in Table 8.13 assume that 75% of storage volume is available for firefighting, maximum day de- mands are occurring on the system and the well with the greatest capacity is out of service. It appears, based on the demand projections used here, that Chanhassen will need about 1.0 million gallons of future additional storage for the system as a whole. There is a trade-off between storage volume for fire protection and water quality. If the storage volume becomes too much greater than average day demands, it can result in longer tank residence times and increased water age. With age, water can lose its chlorine residual and develop taste and odor problems as well as a potential for bacterial contamination. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan221 Previously, 750,000 gallons of elevated storage was recommended for the high zone. Since this recommendation was made, the new 750,000 gallon tank has been constructed. With this tank in place, the projected additional storage need for the water system as a whole is around 1.0MG, which could be constructed in the main zone or as discussed later, in the proposed combine Interbluff Zone. Proposed locations for the future 1.0 MG tank is shown in Appendix A - Figure 7. Existing System 2030 Projection 2040 Projection Average Day Demand 2,568,510 4,399,370 5,148,790 Maximum Day Demand 6,232,000 13,638,048 15,961,249 Maximum Day Demand (gpm)4,328 9,471 11,084 Peak Hour Demand (gpm)8,439 16,100 18,843 Existing Storage Volume (gal)4,200,000 4,200,000 4,200,000 Well Pump Firm Capacity (gpm)7,450 7,450 7,450 Requirement No.1 Storage Volume Recommended (Min. Total Storage) (gal)2,568,510 4,399,370 5,148,790 Requirement No.2 Storage Volume Recommended (Min. Total Storage) (gal)1,973,467 3,182,211 3,724,291 Requirement No.3 Storage Volume Recommended (Min. Elevated Storage) (gal)68,000 994,000 1,284,000 Additional Storage Required (gallons)(1,630,000)200,000 900,000 Assumes Supply Remains Constant Table 8.13 | Complete System Water Storage Requirements 8.8 | Analysis of the Proposed System Layout The computer model of the distribution system was used to calculate pressures and available fire flows as was done previously for the existing system. Much of the new development is expected to the south of the existing water system, where elevations decrease as discussed in previously sections. When PRVs are set in the model to correspond to the recommended hydraulic grades and are located as shown in Appendix A - Figure 7, pressures and available flows for fire protection appear to be adequate to support the proposed land uses, based on the criteria presented in Section 8.4. Extended Period Simulation As part of the previous comprehensive plan, an extended period simulation (EPS) was conducted using the model to analyze system operations during several days of maximum day demands. The primary purpose of this simulation was to check for cumulative system imbalances that are not evident in standard simulations and to verify if system operations can be maintained under high demand conditions. The locations of supply and storage facilities and the sizes of distribution system pipes contribute to imbalances. Considerable distances between supply and storage locations and inadequately sized water mains can contribute to a reduced storage-replenishment rate and the inability to refill the towers at night during low demand periods. Once again, we have conducted a 72-hour water model simulation to review the possible water tower site A loca- tion. We have simulated a 72-hour period with three consecutive maximum day (MD) demand conditions. This time period was chosen since most supply and distribution system deficiencies will be exposed in three days of operations with MD demands. For example, if tanks are unable to refill daily under high demand conditions, a City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan222 trend will emerge in tank level data produced by the EPS. The model was simulated with a new tank located at site A, feeding the combined Interbluff/Lake Riley zone. The simulation found that it is feasible to sustain water system pressures with this type of configuration. The existing main pressure zone tanks operate and float at similar water levels/water elevations while the proposed tank sustains more consistent pressures in the lower pressure zone. 8.9 | Conclusions and Recommendations Supply Environments Firm supply capacity (the supply capacity with the largest pump out of service) should be greater than maximum day demands. The city is currently in the midst of constructing the west water treatment plant, which is estimated to have a capacity equal to the recently constructed east water treatment plant (6,000 gpm). In order to fully utilize these two plants, it is estimated that four new wells will be necessary during the life of this plan to meet projected water demands based on projected development in the city. Distribution System Improvements Trunk main looping should be a priority in the expansion of the service area and in water main replacement projects. The proposed layout of trunk water mains in this report would provide water supply and fire protection capabilities to existing and projected service areas. In addition, recommended trunk mains will connect water supply and storage facilities with points of use on the system. The city can also work towards the eventual combination of the Lake Riley and Interbluff pressure zones, which may be the most ideal location for a new elevated storage tank. Storage Improvements The volume of water storage needed in Chanhassen is dictated by daily demands as well as fire protection. Current- ly, storage capacity is meeting system needs. Projected demands will create a need for one additional 1.0 MG elevated water storage tank over the life of this plan. A new concept, which places a new tank in the combined Lake Riley/Interbluff lower pressure zone which will help supply these pressure zones with water as well as stabilize system pressures. Report and Model Update This report should be reviewed on an annual basis. Changes in development type or densities can have significant impacts on a water system’s performance, especially during drought conditions or emergencies such as fires. A re- port update should be planned for approximately 5 to 10 years dependent on development pressure. The water system model produced as part of this project is a valuable tool in assisting with design and construction of Chanhassen water system components. It can be easily updated on an annual basis and used to evaluate the im- pacts of proposed developments or project phasing. A copy of the computer model will be provided to the city. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan223 APPENDIX A | City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan224 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan225 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan226 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan227 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan228 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan229 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan230 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan231 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan232 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan233 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan234 APPENDIX B | Local Water Supply Plan Template City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan235 Local Water Supply Plan 1 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Local Water Supply Plan Template Third Generation for 2016-2018 Formerly called Water Emergency & Water Conservation Plan City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan236 Local Water Supply Plan 2 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Cover photo by Molly Shodeen For more information on this Water Supply Plan Template, please contact the DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources at (651) 259-5034 or (651) 259-5100. Copyright 2015 State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources This information is available in an alternative format upon request. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, disability or activity on behalf of a local human rights commission. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan237 Local Water Supply Plan 3 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Table of contents INTRODUCTION TO WATER SUPPLY PLANS (WSP).............................................................6 Who needs to complete a Water Supply Plan .......................................................................................... 6 Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA) ............................................................................................. 6 Benefits of completing a WSP ................................................................................................................... 6 WSP Approval Process .............................................................................................................................. 7 PART 1. WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION ................................9 A.Analysis of Water Demand................................................................................................................ 9 B.Treatment and Storage Capacity .................................................................................................... 11 Treatment and storage capacity versus demand ................................................................13 C.Water Sources ................................................................................................................................. 13 Limits on Emergency Interconnections...............................................................................14 D.Future Demand Projections – Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark ............................................ 14 Water Use Trends ..............................................................................................................14 Projection Method ..............................................................................................................15 E.Resource Sustainability ................................................................................................................... 16 Monitoring –Key DNR Benchmark ....................................................................................16 Water Level Data ...............................................................................................................18 Potential Water Supply Issues & Natural Resource Impacts –Key DNR & Metropolitan Council Benchmark ............................................................................................................24 Wellhead Protection (WHP) and Source Water Protection (SWP) Plans ............................28 F.Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) ...................................................................................................... 28 Adequacy of Water Supply System ....................................................................................28 Proposed Future Water Sources ........................................................................................30 Part 2. Emergency Preparedness Procedures ..........................................................................31 A.Federal Emergency Response Plan ................................................................................................. 31 B.Operational Contingency Plan ........................................................................................................ 31 C.Emergency Response Procedures ................................................................................................... 31 Emergency Telephone List ................................................................................................32 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan238 Local Water Supply Plan 4 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Current Water Sources and Service Area ..........................................................................32 Procedure for Augmenting Water Supplies ........................................................................32 Allocation and Demand Reduction Procedures ..................................................................33 Notification Procedures ......................................................................................................35 Enforcement ......................................................................................................................36 PART 3. WATER CONSERVATION PLAN ...............................................................................37 Progress since 2006 ................................................................................................................................ 37 A.Triggers for Allocation and Demand Reduction Actions ................................................................. 39 B.Conservation Objectives and Strategies – Key benchmark for DNR ............................................... 40 Objective 1: Reduce Unaccounted (Non-Revenue) Water loss to Less than 10%..............40 Objective 2: Achieve Less than 75 Residential Gallons per Capita Demand (GPCD).........41 Objective 3: Achieve at least a 1.5% per year water reduction for Institutional, Industrial, Commercial, and Agricultural GPCD over the next 10 years or a 15% reduction in ten years..................................................................................................................................43 Objective 4: Achieve a Decreasing Trend in Total Per Capita Demand ..............................44 Objective 5: Reduce Peak Day Demand so that the Ratio of Average Maximum day to the Average Day is less than 2.6..............................................................................................44 Objective 6: Implement a Conservation Water Rate Structure and/or a Uniform Rate Structure with a Water Conservation Program ...................................................................45 Objective 7: Additional strategies to Reduce Water Use and Support Wellhead Protection Planning .............................................................................................................................48 Objective 8: Tracking Success: How will you track or measure success through the next ten years?................................................................................................................................48 A.Regulation ....................................................................................................................................... 49 B.Retrofitting Programs ..................................................................................................................... 50 Retrofitting Programs .........................................................................................................50 C.Education and Information Programs ............................................................................................. 51 Proposed Education Programs ..........................................................................................51 Part 4. ITEMS FOR METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNITIES .................................................55 A.Water Demand Projections through 2040 ...................................................................................... 55 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan239 Local Water Supply Plan 5 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx B.Potential Water Supply Issues ........................................................................................................ 55 C.Proposed Alternative Approaches to Meet Extended Water Demand Projections ....................... 55 D.Value-Added Water Supply Planning Efforts (Optional) ................................................................. 56 Source Water Protection Strategies ...................................................................................56 Technical assistance..........................................................................................................56 GLOSSARY ..............................................................................................................................57 Acronyms and Initialisms ........................................................................................................................ 60 APPENDICES TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE WATER SUPPLIER .............Error! Bookmark not defined. Appendix 1: Well records and maintenance summaries – see Part 1C .... Error! Bookmark not defined. Appendix 2: Water level monitoring plan – see Part 1E ........................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Appendix 3: Water level graphs for each water supply well - see Part 1E Error! Bookmark not defined. Appendix 4: Capital Improvement Plan - see Part 1E ................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List – see Part 2C .............................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Appendix 6: Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services – see Part 2C ......... Error! Bookmark not defined. Appendix 7: Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Ordinance – see Part 2CError! Bookmark not defined. Appendix 8: Graph showing annual per capita water demand for each customer category during the last ten-years – see Part 3 Objective 4....................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure – see Part 3 Objective 6 ..................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Appendix 10: Adopted or proposed regulations to reduce demand or improve water efficiency – see Part 3 Objective 7 ....................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Appendix 11: Implementation Checklist – summary of all the actions that a community is doing, or proposes to do, including estimated implementation dates – see www.mndnr.gov/watersupplyplans ................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan240 Local Water Supply Plan 6 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES – DIVISION OF ECOLOGICAL AND WATER RESOURCES AND METROPOLITAN COUNCIL INTRODUCTION TO WATER SUPPLY PLANS (WSP) Who needs to complete a Water Supply Plan Public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people, and large private water suppliers in designated Groundwater Management Areas, and all water suppliers in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, are required to prepare and submit a water supply plan. The goal of the WSP is to help water suppliers: 1) implement long term water sustainability and conservation measures; and 2) develop critical emergency preparedness measures. Your community needs to know what measures will be implemented in case of a water crisis. A lot of emergencies can be avoided or mitigated if long term sustainability measures are implemented. Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA) The DNR has designated three areas of the state as Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA) to focus groundwater management efforts in specific geographies where there is an added risk of overuse or water quality degradation. A plan directing the DNR’s actions within each GWMA has been prepared. Although there are no specific additional requirements with respect to the water supply planning for communities within designated GWMA, communities should be aware of the issues and actions planned if they are within the boundary of one of the GWMA. The three GWMA are the North and East Metro GWMA (Twin Cities Metro), the Bonanza Valley GWMA and the Straight River GWMA (near Park Rapids). Additional information and maps are included in the DNR webpage at http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/gwmp/areas.html Benefits of completing a WSP Completing a WSP using this template, fulfills a water supplier’s statutory obligations under M.S. M.S.103G.291 to complete a water supply plan. For water suppliers in the metropolitan area, the WSP will help local governmental units to fulfill their requirements under M.S. 473.859 to complete a local comprehensive plan. Additional benefits of completing WSP template: •The standardized format allows for quicker and easier review and approval. •Help water suppliers prepare for droughts and water emergencies. •Create eligibility for funding requests to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) for the Drinking Water Revolving Fund. •Allow water suppliers to submit requests for new wells or expanded capacity of existing wells. •Simplify the development of county comprehensive water plans and watershed plans. •Fulfill the contingency plan provisions required in the MDH wellhead protection and surface water protection plans. •Fulfill the demand reduction requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.291 Subd. 3 and 4. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan241 Local Water Supply Plan 7 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx •Upon implementation, contribute to maintaining aquifer levels, reducing potential well interference and water use conflicts, and reducing the need to drill new wells or expand system capacity. •Enable DNR to compile and analyze water use and conservation data to help guide decisions. •Conserve Minnesota’s water resources. If your community needs assistance completing the Water Supply Plan, assistance is available from your area hydrologist or groundwater specialist, the MN Rural Waters Association circuit rider program, or in the metropolitan area from Metropolitan Council staff. Many private consultants are also available. WSP Approval Process 10 Basic Steps for completing a 10-Year Water Supply Plan 1.Download the DNR/Metropolitan Council Water Supply Plan Template www.mndnr.gov/watersupplyplans 2.Save the document with a file name with this naming convention: WSP_cityname_permitnumber_date.doc. 3.The template is a form that should be completed electronically. 4.Compile the required water use data (Part 1) and emergency procedures information (Part 2). 5.The Water Conservation section (Part 3) may need discussion with the water department, council, or planning commission, if your community does not already have an active water conservation program. 6.Communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area should complete all the information discussed in Part 4. The Metropolitan Council has additional guidance information on their webpage http://www.metrocouncil.org/Handbook/Plan-Elements/Water- Resources/Water-Supply.aspx. All out-state water suppliers do not need to complete the content addressed in Part 4. 7.Use the Plan instructions and Checklist document to insure all data is complete and attachments are included. This will allow for a quicker approval process. www.mndnr.gov/watersupplyplans 8.Plans should be submitted electronically – no paper documents are required. https://webapps11.dnr.state.mn.us/mpars/public/authentication/login 9.DNR hydrologist will review plans (in cooperation with Metropolitan Council in Metro area) and approve the plan or make recommendations. 10.Once approved, communities should complete a Certification of Adoption form, and send a copy to the DNR. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan242 Local Water Supply Plan 8 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Complete Table 1 with information about the public water supply system covered by this WSP. Table 1. General Information Regarding This WSP Requested Information Description DNR Water Appropriation Permit Number(s) 1981-6089 Ownership Public Metropolitan Council Area Yes – Carver and Hennepin Counties Street Address 7901 Park Place City, State, Zip Chanhassen, MN, 55317 Contact Person Name Kevin Crooks Title Utility Superintendent Phone Number 952-227-1300 MDH Supplier Classification Municipal City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan243 Local Water Supply Plan 9 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx PART 1. WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION The first step in any water supply analysis is to assess the current status of demand and availability. Information summarized in Part 1 can be used to develop Emergency Preparedness Procedures (Part 2) and the Water Conservation Plan (Part 3). This data is also needed to track progress for water efficiency measures. A.Analysis of Water Demand Complete Table 2 showing the past 10 years of water demand data. •Some of this information may be in your Wellhead Protection Plan. •If you do not have this information, do your best, call your engineer for assistance or if necessary leave blank. If your customer categories are different than the ones listed in Table 2, please describe the differences below: N/A City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan244 Local Water Supply Plan 10 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Table 2. Historic Water Demand (see definitions in the glossary after Part 4 of this template) Year Pop. Served Total Connections Resident ial Water Delivere d (MG) C/I/I Water Deliver ed (MG) Water used for Non- essential Wholesa le Deliverie s (MG) Total Water Delivered (MG) Total Water Pumped (MG) Water Supplier Services Percent Unmetered/ Unaccounted Average Daily Demand (MGD) Max. Daily Demand (MGD) Date of Max. Demand Residential Per Capita Demand (GPCD) Total per capita Demand (GPCD) 2005 22,194 6,779 688.5 250.2 938.7 982 4.4% 2.7 7.7 7/16/05 85.0 115.9 2006 22,219 6,645 861.1 266.1 1,127.2 1,154.8 2.4% 3.1 9.8 7/7/06 106.2 139.0 2007 23.889 6,796 774.3 256.3 1.030.7 1,106.5 6.8% 2.8 8.9 7/21/07 88.8 118.2 2008 24,321 7,276 786.1 298.3 1,084.4 1,175.9 7.8% 3.2 7.7 7/6/08 88.3 121.8 2009 24,481 7,361 827.2 346.2 1,173.4 1,329.5 11.7% 3.2 8.4 7/12/09 92.6 131.3 2010 24,699 7,885 689.2 281.9 971.1 985.0 1.4% 2.7 6.4 7/15/10 76.5 107.7 2011 23,179 7,655 749.1 258.1 1,007.2 1,034.7 2.7% 2.8 6.6 9/10/11 88.5 119.0 2012 23,484 7,492 867.1 312.9 1,180.0 1,189.6 6.9% 3.2 7.9 7/23/12 100.9 137.3 2013 23,840 7,924 764.2 277.6 1,042.4 1,049.9 0.7% 2.9 8.15 7/12/13 87.8 119.8 2014 24,432 8,048 675.7 252.3 928.0 964.5 3.8% 2.6 7.2 8/15/14 75.8 104.1 2015 24,951 8,075 619.1 291.9 911.0 926.3 1.6% 2.5 6.2 8/23/15 68.0 100.0 Avg. 2010- 2015 754.69 281.07 942.13 1081.7 4.53% 2.88 6.98 87.13 119.46 MG – Million Gallons MGD – Million Gallons per Day GPCD – Gallons per Capita per Day City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan245 Local Water Supply Plan 11 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Complete Table 3 by listing the top 10 water users by volume, from largest to smallest. For each user, include information about the category of use (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, or wholesale), the amount of water used in gallons per year, the percent of total water delivered, and the status of water conservation measures. Table 3. Large Volume Users Customer Use Category (Residential, Industrial, Commercial, Institutional, Wholesale) Amount Used (Gallons per Year) Percent of Total Annual Water Delivered Implementing Water Conservation Measures? (Yes/No/Unknown) 1 GENERAL MILLS 20,357,000 2.23% UNKNOWN 2 ROSEMOUNT INC 16,963,000 1.86% YES 3 LIFETIME FITNESS 8,635,000 0.95% UNKNOWN 4 BANTA DIRECT MARKETING 6,253,000 0.69% UNKNOWN 5 IWCO DIRECT 5,594,000 0.61% YES 6 CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATER 5,429,000 0.60% UNKNOWN 7 CONV STORE INVEST 3,596,000 0.39% UNKNOWN 8 ISD 112 3,542,000 0.39% YES 9 CITY OF SHOREWOOD 18 HOMES + HYDRANTS 3,509,000 0.39% UNKNOWN 10 POWERS RIDGE 3,320,000 0.36% YES B.Treatment and Storage Capacity Complete Table 4 with a description of where water is treated, the year treatment facilities were constructed, water treatment capacity, the treatment methods (i.e. chemical addition, reverse osmosis, coagulation, sedimentation, etc.) and treatment types used (i.e. fluoridation, softening, chlorination, Fe/MN removal, coagulation, etc.). Also describe the annual amount and method of disposal of treatment residuals. Add rows to the table as needed. Table 4. Water Treatment Capacity and Treatment Processes Treatment Site ID (Plant Name or Well ID) Year Constructed Treatment Capacity (GPD) Treatment Method Treatment Type Annual Amount of Residuals Disposal Process for Residuals Do You Reclaim Filter Backwash Water? East Water Plant 2007 8.64MGD Chemical Addition/ Gravity Iron/ Manganese 2.35 MG Sanitary Sewer (Met Council) Yes Total NA NA NA NA Complete Table 5 with information about storage structures. Describe the type (i.e. elevated, ground, etc.), the storage capacity of each type of structure, the year each structure was constructed, and the primary material for each structure. Add rows to the table as needed. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan246 Local Water Supply Plan 12 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan247 Local Water Supply Plan 13 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Table 5. Storage Capacity, as of the End of the Last Calendar Year Structure Name Type of Storage Structure Year Constructed Primary Material Storage Capacity (Gallons) 1 Elevated storage 1987 Steel 3,500,000 2 Elevated storage 1999 Steel 1,500,000 3 Elevated storage 2013 Composite - Steel/Concrete 750,000 4 Ground storage 2005 Concrete 250,000 5 Other - Total NA NA NA 6,000,000 Treatment and storage capacity versus demand It is recommended that total storage equal or exceed the average daily demand. Discuss the difference between current storage and treatment capacity versus the water supplier’s projected average water demand over the next 10 years (see Table 7 for projected water demand). The average daily water demand is 2.88 MGD. The current water storage capacity should be sufficient for the next 5 years based on current projections. C.Water Sources Complete Table 6 by listing all types of water sources that supply water to the system, including groundwater, surface water, interconnections with other water suppliers, or others. Provide the name of each source (aquifer name, river or lake name, name of interconnecting water supplier) and the Minnesota-unique well number or intake ID, as appropriate. Report the year the source was installed or established and the current capacity. Provide information about the depth of all wells. Describe the status of the source (active, inactive, emergency only, retail/wholesale interconnection) and if the source facilities have a dedicated emergency power source. Add rows to the table as needed for each installation. Include copies of well records and maintenance summary for each well that has occurred since your last approved plan in Appendix 1. Table 6. Water Sources and Status Resource Type (Groundwater, Surface water, Interconnection) Resource Name MN Unique Well # or Intake ID Year Install ed Capacity (Gallons per Minute) Well Depth (Feet) Status of Normal and Emergency Operations (active, inactive, emergency only, retail/wholesale interconnection)) Does this Source have a Dedicated Emergency Power Source? (Yes or No) Dell Rd Interconnect Eden Prairie 2013 1,000 GPM Emergency Yes 82nd St Interconnect Chaska 1997 1,000 GPM Emergency Yes City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan248 Local Water Supply Plan 14 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Resource Type (Groundwater, Surface water, Interconnection) Resource Name MN Unique Well # or Intake ID Year Install ed Capacity (Gallons per Minute) Well Depth (Feet) Status of Normal and Emergency Operations (active, inactive, emergency only, retail/wholesale interconnection)) Does this Source have a Dedicated Emergency Power Source? (Yes or No) Near Mountain Interconnect Shorewood 1985 1,000 GPM Emergency Yes Strawberry Lane Interconnect Shorewood 2014 1,000 GPM Emergency Yes Groundwater Prairie du Chien-Jordan Well #2, ID #220976 1969 650 GPM 471 Active No Groundwater Prairie du Chien-Jordan Well #3, ID #200195 1973 400 GPM 500 Active No Groundwater Prairie du Chien-Jordan Well #4, ID#180913 1981 850 GPM 665 Active No Groundwater Glacial Drift Well #5, ID #471308 1991 0 215 Active No Groundwater Glacial Drift Well #6, ID #494519 1991 0 218 Active No Groundwater Prairie du Chien-Jordan Well #7,ID #541545 1996 650 GPM 490 Active No Groundwater Prairie du Chien-Jordan Well #8, ID #578953 1999 900 GPM 489 Active No Groundwater Prairie du Chien-Jordan Well #9, ID #709304 2004 800 GPM 482 Active No Groundwater Prairie du Chien-Jordan Well #10, ID #737048 2006 650 GPM 482 Active Yes Groundwater Glacial Drift Well #11, ID #737049 2006 250 GPM 214 Active No Groundwater Prairie du Chien-Jordan Well #12, ID #760936 2008 1,300 GPM 441 Active No Groundwater Prairie du Chien-Jordan Well #13, ID #760937 2008 1,250 GPM 460 Active No Groundwater Prairie du Chien-Jordan Well #14, ID #775541 2010 1,400 GPM 472 Active No Groundwater Jordan Well #15, ID #810696 2015 1,000 GPM 531 Active No Limits on Emergency Interconnections Discuss any limitations on the use of the water sources (e.g. not to be operated simultaneously, limitations due to blending, aquifer recovery issues etc.) and the use of interconnections, including capacity limits or timing constraints (i.e. only 200 gallons per minute are available from the City of Prior Lake, and it is estimated to take 6 hours to establish the emergency connection). If there are no limitations, list none. About 8 hours to establish Eden Prairie connection (pump required). All others - no limitations. D.Future Demand Projections – Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark Water Use Trends Use the data in Table 2 to describe trends in 1) population served; 2) total per capita water demand; 3) average daily demand; 4) maximum daily demand. Then explain the causes for upward or downward trends. For example, over the ten years has the average daily demand trended up or down? Why is this occurring? City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan249 Local Water Supply Plan 15 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx From 2005 to 2015, the City of Chanhassen has seen about a 12.5% increase in population. Over this same period, the average daily demand has been relatively flat with a slight decrease over the past 3 years. The maximum daily demand has seen a slight decrease over the last 10 years. Over the past 5 years, the summer months has seen above average precipitation. Water use, especially maximum daily demand, is highly dependent on summer climate conditions. Along with water conservation initiatives and more efficiencies to the system, the water use trend has been flat and is projected to remain flat unless precipitation amounts during the summer months dramatically decrease. Use the water use trend information discussed above to complete Table 7 with projected annual demand for the next ten years. Communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area must also include projections for 2030 and 2040 as part of their local comprehensive planning. Projected demand should be consistent with trends evident in the historical data in Table 2, as discussed above. Projected demand should also reflect state demographer population projections and/or other planning projections. Table 7. Projected Annual Water Demand Year Projected Total Population Projected Population Served Projected Total Per Capita Water Demand (GPCD) Projected Average Daily Demand (MGD) Projected Maximum Daily Demand (MGD) 2016 24,951 22,581 145 3.4 9.0 2017 25,338 22,968 145 3.4 9.2 2018 25,826 23,456 145 3.5 9.4 2019 26,262 23,892 145 3.5 9.5 2020 26,700 24,330 145 3.7 9.7 2021 27,533 25,163 145 3.7 10.0 2022 28,366 25,996 145 3.8 10.3 2023 29,199 26,829 145 3.9 10.6 2024 30,032 27,662 145 3.9 10.9 2025 30,865 28,495 145 4.0 11.2 2030 31,700 29,330 145 4.78 11.5 2040 37,100 34,730 145 5.17 13.4 GPCD – Gallons per Capita per Day MGD – Million Gallons per Day Projection Method Describe the method used to project water demand, including assumptions for population and business growth and how water conservation and efficiency programs affect projected water demand. The City anticipates the average water use per capita projections to remain relatively flat. Business use should increase slightly but remain relatively flat due to greater efficiencies. The City is anticipating water reuse irrigation systems will be used more in the future which should help reduce peak demands. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan250 Local Water Supply Plan 16 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx E.Resource Sustainability Monitoring – Key DNR Benchmark Complete Table 8 by inserting information about source water quality monitoring efforts. The list should include all production wells, observation wells, and source water intakes or reservoirs. Additional information on groundwater level monitoring program at: http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/groundwater_section/obwell/index.html. Add rows to the table as needed. Table 8. Information about Source Water Quality Monitoring MN Unique Well # or Surface Water ID Type of monitoring point Monitoring program Frequency of monitoring Monitoring Method Unique ID #220976 Well #2 X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir  Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique ID #200195 Well #3 X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique ID #180913 Well #4 X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique ID #471308 Well #5 X production well (maintenance permit well)  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly X annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique ID #494519 Well #6 X production well (maintenance permit well)  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other hourly  daily X monthly quarterly annually  SCADA X grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique #541545 Well #7 X production well  observation well  source water intake Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling X continuous hourly  daily X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan251 Local Water Supply Plan 17 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx MN Unique Well # or Surface Water ID Type of monitoring point Monitoring program Frequency of monitoring Monitoring Method  source water reservoir  other  monthly quarterly annually Unique #578953 Well #8 X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique #709304 Well #9 X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique #737048 Well #10 X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique ID #737049 Well #11 175 W78th St. X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique #760936 Well #12 7610 S. Shore Dr. X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique #760937 Well #13 55 Lake Dr. E. X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique ID #775541 Well #14 730 Lake Dr. X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique ID #810696 Well #15 1700 Lake Lucy Rd. X production well  observation well  source water intake Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan252 Local Water Supply Plan 18 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx MN Unique Well # or Surface Water ID Type of monitoring point Monitoring program Frequency of monitoring Monitoring Method  source water reservoir annually Unique #775542 Monitoring Well A 9405 Great Plains Blvd.  production well X observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique #775543 Monitoring Well B 9405 Great Plains Blvd.  production well X observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Water Level Data A water level monitoring plan that includes monitoring locations and a schedule for water level readings must be submitted as Appendix 2. If one does not already exist, it needs to be prepared and submitted with the WSP. Ideally, all production and observation wells are monitored at least monthly. Complete Table 9 to summarize water level data for each well being monitored. Provide the name of the aquifer and a brief description of how much water levels vary over the season (the difference between the highest and lowest water levels measured during the year) and the long-term trends for each well. If water levels are not measured and recorded on a routine basis, then provide the static water level when each well was constructed and the most recent water level measured during the same season the well was constructed. Also include all water level data taken during any well and pump maintenance. Add rows to the table as needed. Provide water level data graphs for each well in Appendix 3 for the life of the well, or for as many years as water levels have been measured. See DNR website for Date Time Water Level http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/groundwater_section/obwell/waterleveldata.html. Table 9. Water Level Data City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan253 Local Water Supply Plan 19 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Unique Well Number or Well ID Aquifer Name Seasonal Variation (Feet) Long-term Trend in water level data Water level measured during well/pumping maintenance Unique ID #220976 Well #2 6/1969 Prairie du Chien- Jordan 7 ft.  Falling ☒ Stable  Rising 6/69: 108 7/30/73: 150 8/12/74: 117 8/14/75: 123.9 8/17/76: 124’8” 9/6/78: 122’5” 3/23/84: 124 /23/94: 136’7” 3/18/13: 152.9’ 9/13/13: 189.0’ 2/27/14: 179.8’ 8/28/14: 155.8’ 2/27/15: 148.2’ 8/28/15: 153.1’ 3/13/15: 147’8” 5/22/15: 151’11” 6/29/15: 152’10” 7/27/15: 167’1” 8/26/15: 155’7” 2/25/16: 149’2” Unique ID #200195 Well #3 Prairie du Chien- Jordan 1-5 ft.  Falling ☒Stable  Rising 8/30/77: 140.8 9/8/78: 141.7 9/26/79: 143.8 3/23/84: 160.8 4/28/87:148’ 8/15/87:143’6” 2/28/88:144’10” 8/17/88:150’7” 2/25/89:148’8” 8/12/89:153’1” 2/21/90:151’9” 9/1/90:155’8” 2/20/91:152’4” 8/28/91:154’11” 2/29/92:152’7” 8/12/92:156’6” 2/14/93:152’10” 8/21/93:154’1” 2/12/94:153’6” 8/28/94:155’3” 2/25/95:152’10” 8/26/95:155’0” 2/24/96:152’4” 7/24/96:44.4 2/23/97:48.2 8/23/97:46.8 2/28/98:48.5 9/6/98:44.6 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan254 Local Water Supply Plan 20 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Unique Well Number or Well ID Aquifer Name Seasonal Variation (Feet) Long-term Trend in water level data Water level measured during well/pumping maintenance 2/22/99:46.5 9/19/99:44.4 2/26/00:47.1 8/19/00:42.8 7/27/11: 167.7 1/9/12: 162.7 3/6/13: 164.4 3/13/15:160’3” 5/22/15:161’3” 6/23/15:161’7” 7/27/15:153’4” 2/25/16: 159’ Unique ID #180913 Well #4 Prairie du Chien- Jordan 1-7 ft. Falling ☒ Stable  Rising 8/19/81: 84’ drill 3/23/84: 80’2” 8/1/87: 75’0” 8/2/88: 94’1” 8/4/89: 86’7” 8/8/90: 85’4” 4/3/91: 82’1” 8/7/91: 86’8” 3/4/92: 82’1” 8/1/92: 87’0” 3/6/93: 84’1” 8/1/93: 86’1” 3/5/94: 87’8” 8/6/94: 89’10” 3/4/95: 83’6” 8/5/95: 86’7” 3/30/96: 85’8” 8/10/96: 89’2” 3/29/97: 88’5” 8/10/97: 88’1” 3/28/98: 90’0” 8/1/98: 90’3” 3/27/99: 87’9” 7/3/99: 88’0” 7/7/00: 89’1” 8/12/00: 114’9” 8/1/01: 104’8” 11/6/01: 93’7” 4/1/02: 90’7” 11/1/02: 89’8” 9/4/04: 96’1” 1/11/05: 91’9” 7/11/06: 100’ 7/24/07: 118’ 12/19/07: 96’ 7/27/11: 111.6’ City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan255 Local Water Supply Plan 21 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Unique Well Number or Well ID Aquifer Name Seasonal Variation (Feet) Long-term Trend in water level data Water level measured during well/pumping maintenance 1/9/12: 99.2’ 3/6/13: 101.7” 8/28/14: 102.8’ 2/27/15: 95.1’ 3/13/15: 95’10” 5/22/15: 102’7” 8/28/15: 100.8’ 2/25/16: 96’11” 2/29/16: 94.9’ Unique ID #471308 Well #5 Glacial Drift  Falling ☒ Stable  Rising 8/13/90: 125’ 8/3/91: 133’4” 4/1/92: 133’3” 8/1/92: 136’0” 4/10/93: 134’10” 8/1/93: 136’6” 4/2/94: 136’8” 8/6/94: 140’6” 4/1/95: 137’9” 11/11/95: 141’1” 4/6/96: 139’2” 11/3/96: 146’7” 4/5/97: 140’5” 10/11/97: 146’8” 4/4/98: 141’5” 11/8/98: 146’0” 4/3/99: 139’11” 11/20/99: 145’2” 1/18/00: 147’9” 4/15/00: 142’2” 11/6/01: 150’8” 3/1/02: 149’1” 1/12/05: 147’7” 7/24/07: 158’6” 8/2/08: 161’ 12/4/08: 153’ 5/5/09: 151’ 1/9/12: 152.7’ 3/6/13: 152.7’ Unique ID #494519 Well #6 Glacial Drift  Falling ☒ Stable  Rising 4/1/92: 131’5” 11/7/92: 134’7” 4/4/93: 132’8” 11/6/93: 135’11” 3/26/94: 133’11” 11/13/94: 136’0” 4/15/95: 134’11” 11/4/95: 138’5” 4/27/96: 138’10” 11/9/96: 144’3” City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan256 Local Water Supply Plan 22 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Unique Well Number or Well ID Aquifer Name Seasonal Variation (Feet) Long-term Trend in water level data Water level measured during well/pumping maintenance 4/5/97: 140’7” 11/8/97: 142’6” 4/4/98: 139’10” 11/8/98: 142’4” 4/3/99: 138’2” 8/28/99: 141’6” 4/2/00: 140’5” 11/18/00: 148’10” 12/2/00: 144’5” 7/24/07: 159’ 8/30/07: 157’9” 3/18/08: 149’11” 12/4/08: 149’3” 7/27/11: 149.8 1/9/12: 154.3 3/6/13: 151.2 5/10/16: 144.5’ Unique #541545 Well #7 Prairie du Chien- Jordan  Falling ☒ Stable  Rising 6/28/96: 135.0 7/27/11: 158.2 1/9/12: 152.7 3/6/13: 133.6 3/18/13: n/a 9/13/13: 157.3 2/27/14: 150.6 8/28/14: 154.3 2/27/15: 150.2 8/28/15: 153.2 2/29/16: 149.4 Unique #578953 Well #8 Prairie du Chien- Jordan  Falling ☒ Stable  Rising 1/25/99: 180.5 9/24/01: 194.5 4/1/02: 194 6/3/02: 199 11/1/02: 190 9/1/04: 207.5 1/12/05: 199.5 7/24/07: 200 10/6/07: 195 7/27/11: 195.6 1/9/12: 189.5 3/18/13: 189.1 9/13/13: 194.3 2/27/14: 188.0 8/28/14: 191.4 2/27/15: 187.7 8/28/15: 190.2 2/29/16: 186.2 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan257 Local Water Supply Plan 23 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Unique Well Number or Well ID Aquifer Name Seasonal Variation (Feet) Long-term Trend in water level data Water level measured during well/pumping maintenance Unique #709304 Well #9 Prairie du Chien- Jordan  Falling ☒Stable  Rising 1/21/09: 148 1/9/12: 149.5 3/18/13: 149.2 9/13/13: 154.4 2/27/14: 147.2 8/28/14: 150.2 2/27/15: 148.2 8/28/15: 151.1 2/29/16: 150.9 Unique #737048 Well #10 Prairie du Chien- Jordan  Falling ☒Stable  Rising 1/21/09: 163 7/27/11: 169.5 1/9/12: 180.4 3/18/13: 156.0 9/13/13: 172.3 2/27/14: 160.1 8/28/14: 162.8 2/27/15: 153.4 8/28/15: 150.3 2/29/16: 154.0 Unique ID #737049 Well #11 Glacial Drift  Falling ☒Stable  Rising 3/24/06: 137 7/24/07: 157 8/31/07: 155 12/28/07: 149 12/04/08: 148 1/9/09: 146 7/27/11: 147.6 1/9/12: 147 3/6/13: 147.7 Unique #760936 Well #12 Prairie du Chien- Jordan  Falling ☒Stable  Rising 7/27/11: 103.3 1/9/12: 97.7 3/18/13: 94.7 9/13/13: 112.3 2/27/14: 95.3 8/28/14: 103.2 2/27/15: 94.0 8/28/15: 97.7 2/29/16: 95.4 Unique #760937 Well #13 Prairie du Chien- Jordan  Falling ☒Stable  Rising 7/27/11: 127.3 1/9/12: 122.3 3/18/13: 121.4 9/13/13: 138.2 2/27/14: 120.9 8/28/14: 127.4 2/27/15: 119.5 8/28/15: 124.9 2/29/16: 118.9 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan258 Local Water Supply Plan 24 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Unique Well Number or Well ID Aquifer Name Seasonal Variation (Feet) Long-term Trend in water level data Water level measured during well/pumping maintenance Unique ID #775541 Well #14 Prairie du Chien- Jordan  Falling ☒ Stable  Rising 7/27/11: 150.1 1/9/12:143.7 3/18/13: 139.9 9/13/13: 162.7 2/27/14: 152.0 8/28/14: 149.5 2/27/15: 140.2 8/28/15: 146.4 2/29/16: 137.4 Unique ID # 810696 Well #15 Jordan  Falling ☒ Stable  Rising 8/12/16: 164.9 Unique #775542 Monitoring Well A  Falling ☒ Stable  Rising 3/18/13: 117.5 9/13/13: 124.7 1/24/14: 118.3 8/28/14: 123.3 2/27/15: 119.8 8/28/15: 121.4 2/29/16: 123.6 Unique #775543 Monitoring Well B  Falling ☒ Stable  Rising 3/18/13: 120.5 9/13/13: 125.0 2/27/14: 121.3 8/28/14: 123.2 2/27/15: 120.8 8/28/15: 122.3 2/29/16: 122.4 Potential Water Supply Issues & Natural Resource Impacts – Key DNR & Metropolitan Council Benchmark Complete Table 10 by listing the types of natural resources that are or could be impacted by permitted water withdrawals. If known, provide the name of specific resources that may be impacted. Identify what the greatest risks to the resource are and how the risks are being assessed. Identify any resource protection thresholds – formal or informal – that have been established to identify when actions should be taken to mitigate impacts. Provide information about the potential mitigation actions that may be taken, if a resource protection threshold is crossed. Add additional rows to the table as needed. See the glossary at the end of the template for definitions. Some of this baseline data should have been in your earlier water supply plans or county comprehensive water plans. When filling out this table, think of what are the water supply risks, identify the resources, determine the threshold and then determine what your community will do to mitigate the impacts. Your DNR area hydrologist is available to assist with this table. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan259 Local Water Supply Plan 25 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx For communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area, the Master Water Supply Plan Appendix 1 (Water Supply Profiles, provides information about potential water supply issues and natural resource impacts for your community. Table 10. Natural Resource Impacts Resource Type Resource Name Risk Risk Assessed Through Describe Resource Protection Threshold* Mitigation Measure or Management Plan Describe How Changes to Thresholds are Monitored ☒ River or stream Bluff Creek, Riley Creek & Assumption Creek ☐ Flow/water level decline ☒ Degrading water quality trends and/or MCLs exceeded  Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat or other natural resource impacts Other: _____  GIS analysis ☐ Modeling  Mapping  Monitoring  Aquifer testing ☒ Other: Risk Assessment is through the local watershed district which has jurisdiction. Thresholds are set by other the watershed districts.  Revise permit  Change groundwater pumping  Increase conservation ☒ Other. The City will work with other organizations who sets the thresholds. The City works with the watershed district to manage the resource. Monitoring is completed by other agencies. ☒ Calcareous fen Seminary Fen ☒ Flow/water level decline  Degrading water quality trends and/or MCLs exceeded  Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat or other natural resource impacts Other: _____  GIS analysis  Modeling  Mapping  Monitoring ☐ Aquifer testing ☒ Other: The DNR and wateshed district are monitoring the Fen. The Minnesota DNR is actively monitoring the Fen and sets the threshold.  Revise permit  Change groundwater pumping  Increase conservation ☒ Other: The DNR is working on a management plan for this resource. The City is actively working with other agencies such as the DNR, Met. Council and watershed district to monitor any changes to the resource. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan260 Local Water Supply Plan 26 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Resource Type Resource Name Risk Risk Assessed Through Describe Resource Protection Threshold* Mitigation Measure or Management Plan Describe How Changes to Thresholds are Monitored ☒ Lake Minnewashta, Ann, Lucy, Christmas, Lotus, Susan & Riley  Flow/water level decline ☒ Degrading water quality trends and/or MCLs exceeded  Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat or other natural resource impacts Other: _____  GIS analysis  GIS analysis  Modeling  Mapping ☐ Monitoring  Aquifer testing ☒ Other: watershed district The local watershed district sets the threshold.  Revise permit  Change groundwater pumping  Increase conservation ☒ Other: The City is working with the watershed districts on management plans. The watershed district sets the thresholds and monitors the lakes. ☒ Wetland  Flow/water level decline ☒ Degrading water quality trends and/or MCLs exceeded  Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat or other natural resource impacts Other: _____  GIS analysis  Modeling  Mapping  Monitoring  Aquifer testing ☒ Other: watershed district The local watershed district sets the threshold.  Revise permit  Change groundwater pumping  Increase conservation ☒ Other: The City is working with the watershed districts on management plans. The watershed district sets the thresholds and monitors the wetlands. ☒ Trout Stream Assumption Creek ☒ Flow/water level decline  Degrading water quality trends and/or  GIS analysis  Modeling  Mapping  Monitoring Other agencies set the thresholds  Revise permit  Change groundwater pumping  Increase conservation Other agencies are monitoring the stream and sets the thresholds. The City is City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan261 Local Water Supply Plan 27 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Resource Type Resource Name Risk Risk Assessed Through Describe Resource Protection Threshold* Mitigation Measure or Management Plan Describe How Changes to Thresholds are Monitored MCLs exceeded  Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat or other natural resource impacts Other: _____  Aquifer testing ☒Other: Metropolitan Council, DNR, watershed district, U.S. Fish and Wildlife. ☒Other: Other agencies are monitoring the stream and are working on a management plan. actively participating in these discussions. ☒Aquifer Drift, Prairie du Chien, Jordan, Tunnel City, and Mount Simon/Hinckley. ☒ Flow/water level decline  Degrading water quality trends and/or MCLs exceeded  Impacts on endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat or other natural resource impacts Other: _____  GIS analysis  Modeling  Mapping  Monitoring  Aquifer testing ☐Other: SCADA The City will work with the DNR and the Metropolitan Council on setting thresholds.  Revise permit  Change groundwater pumping ☒Increase conservation ☒Other: Evaluate using another aquifer other than the impacted aquifer. Evaluate other water sources besides aquifer resource. The City will work with the DNR and the Metropolitan Council on setting thresholds. This has to be completed on a regional basis.  Endangered, threatened, or special concern species habitat, other Natural resource impacts * Examples of thresholds: a lower limit on acceptable flow in a river or stream; water quality outside of an accepted range; a lower limit on acceptable aquifer level decline at one or more monitoring wells; City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan262 Local Water Supply Plan 28 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx withdrawals that exceed some percent of the total amount available from a source; or a lower limit on acceptable changes to a protected habitat. Wellhead Protection (WHP) and Source Water Protection (SWP) Plans Complete Table 11 to provide status information about WHP and SWP plans. The emergency procedures in this plan are intended to comply with the contingency plan provisions required in the Minnesota Department of Health’s (MDH) Wellhead Protection (WHP) Plan and Surface Water Protection (SWP) Plan. Table 11. Status of Wellhead Protection and Source Water Protection Plans Plan Type Status Date Adopted Date for Update WHP  In Process Completed  Not Applicable 11/7/12 11/7/22 SWP  In Process  Completed  Not Applicable 6/01/18 WHP – Wellhead Protection Plan SWP – Source Water Protection Plan F.Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Please note that any wells that received approval under a ten-year permit, but that were not built, are now expired and must submit a water appropriations permit. Adequacy of Water Supply System Complete Table 12 with information about the adequacy of wells and/or intakes, storage facilities, treatment facilities, and distribution systems to sustain current and projected demands. List planned capital improvements for any system components, in chronological order. Communities in the seven- county Twin Cities metropolitan area should also include information about plans through 2040. The assessment can be the general status by category; it is not necessary to identify every single well, storage facility, treatment facility, lift station, and mile of pipe. Please attach your latest Capital Improvement Plan as Appendix 4. Table 12. Adequacy of Water Supply System System Component Planned action Anticipated Construction Year Notes Wells/Intakes  No action planned - adequate ☒Repair/replacement ☒Expansion/addition Wells will be added as growth of the community City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan263 Local Water Supply Plan 29 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx System Component Planned action Anticipated Construction Year Notes dictates. Well pumps and motors are inspected and serviced every 8 years. Water Storage Facilities  No action planned - adequate ☒ Repair/replacement ☒ Expansion/addition The Watertower Place tank (1.5 MG) is scheduled to be recoated in 2019. New water storage facilities will be added as development dictates. Water Treatment Facilities  No action planned - adequate  Repair/replacement ☒ Expansion/addition A west water treatment facility is scheduled to be constructed in 2017 to treat the west well field. Distribution Systems (pipes, valves, etc.)  No action planned - adequate ☒ Repair/replacement ☒ Expansion/addition The City is removing cast iron pipe from the distribution system with street reconstruction projects. Annually, the City exercises valves and hydrants and makes repairs as needed. Pressure Zones  No action planned - adequate  Repair/replacement ☒ Expansion/addition Added as development occurs. Other:  No action planned - adequate  Repair/replacement  Expansion/addition City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan264 Local Water Supply Plan 30 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Proposed Future Water Sources Complete Table 13 to identify new water source installation planned over the next ten years. Add rows to the table as needed. Table 13. Proposed Future Installations/Sources Source Installation Location (approximate) Resource Name Proposed Pumping Capacity (gpm) Planned Installation Year Planned Partnerships Groundwater West Well Field Jordan, Tunnel City or Mount Simon- Hinckley Aquifers 1,000 gpm Possibly 3 new wells needed to in the next 10 years None Surface Water None Interconnection to another supplier None Planned Water Source Alternatives - Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark Do you anticipate the need for alternative water sources in the next 10 years? __ Yes _X_ No For metro communities, will you need alternative water sources by the year 2040? __ Yes _X_ No Unknown at this time. If you answered yes for either question, then complete table 14. If no, insert NA. Complete Table 14 by checking the box next to alternative approaches that your community is considering, including approximate locations (if known), the estimated amount of future demand that could be met through the approach, the estimated timeframe to implement the approach, potential partnerships, and the major benefits and challenges of the approach. Add rows to the table as needed. For communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area, these alternatives should include approaches the community is considering to meet projected 2040 water demand. Table 14. Alternative water sources Alternative Source Considered Source and/or Installation Location (approximate) Estimated Amount of Future Demand (%) Timeframe to Implement (YYYY) Potential Partners Benefits Challenges  Groundwater  Surface Water  Reclaimed Stormwater  Reclaimed Wastewater  Interconnection To Another Supplier City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan265 Local Water Supply Plan 31 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Part 2. Emergency Preparedness Procedures The emergency preparedness procedures outlined in this plan are intended to comply with the contingency plan provisions required by MDH in the WHP and SWP. Water emergencies can occur as a result of vandalism, sabotage, accidental contamination, mechanical problems, power failings, drought, flooding, and other natural disasters. The purpose of emergency planning is to develop emergency response procedures and to identify actions needed to improve emergency preparedness. In the case of a municipality, these procedures should be in support of, and part of, an all-hazard emergency operations plan. Municipalities that already have written procedures dealing with water emergencies should review the following information and update existing procedures to address these water supply protection measures. A.Federal Emergency Response Plan Section 1433(b) of the Safe Drinking Water Act, (Public Law 107-188, Title IV- Drinking Water Security and Safety) requires community water suppliers serving over 3,300 people to prepare an Emergency Response Plan. Do you have a federal emergency response plan? ☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, what was the date it was certified? ____________________ Complete Table 15 by inserting the noted information regarding your completed Federal Emergency Response Plan. Table 15. Emergency Preparedness Plan Contact Information Emergency Response Plan Role Contact Person Contact Phone Number Contact Email Emergency Response Lead Kevin Crooks 612-490-7776 kcrooks@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Alternate Emergency Response Lead Craig Carlson 612-217-3442 ccarlson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us B.Operational Contingency Plan All utilities should have a written operational contingency plan that describes measures to be taken for water supply mainline breaks and other common system failures as well as routine maintenance. Do you have a written operational contingency plan? ☐ Yes ☒ No At a minimum, a water supplier should prepare and maintain an emergency contact list of contractors and suppliers. C.Emergency Response Procedures Water suppliers must meet the requirements of MN Rules 4720.5280. Accordingly, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) requires public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people to submit Emergency and Conservation Plans. Water emergency and conservation plans that have been approved by the DNR, under provisions of Minnesota Statute 186 and Minnesota Rules, Part 6115.0770, will be considered equivalent to an approved WHP contingency plan. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan266 Local Water Supply Plan 32 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Emergency Telephone List Prepare and attach a list of emergency contacts, including the MN Duty Officer (1-800-422-0798), as Appendix 5. A template is available at www.mndnr.gov/watersupplyplans The list should include key utility and community personnel, contacts in adjacent water suppliers, and appropriate local, state and federal emergency contacts. Please be sure to verify and update the contacts on the emergency telephone list and date it. Thereafter, update on a regular basis (once a year is recommended). In the case of a municipality, this information should be contained in a notification and warning standard operating procedure maintained by the Emergency Manager for that community. Responsibilities and services for each contact should be defined. Current Water Sources and Service Area Quick access to concise and detailed information on water sources, water treatment, and the distribution system may be needed in an emergency. System operation and maintenance records should be maintained in secured central and back-up locations so that the records are accessible for emergency purposes. A detailed map of the system showing the treatment plants, water sources, storage facilities, supply lines, interconnections, and other information that would be useful in an emergency should also be readily available. It is critical that public water supplier representatives and emergency response personnel communicate about the response procedures and be able to easily obtain this kind of information both in electronic and hard copy formats (in case of a power outage). Do records and maps exist? ☒ Yes  No Can staff access records and maps from a central secured location in the event of an emergency? ☒Yes  No Does the appropriate staff know where the materials are located? ☒Yes  No Procedure for Augmenting Water Supplies Complete Tables 16 – 17 by listing all available sources of water that can be used to augment or replace existing sources in an emergency. Add rows to the tables as needed. In the case of a municipality, this information should be contained in a notification and warning standard operating procedure maintained by the warning point for that community. Municipalities are encouraged to execute cooperative agreements for potential emergency water services and copies should be included in Appendix 6. Outstate communities may consider using nearby high capacity wells (industry, golf course) as emergency water sources. WSP should include information on any physical or chemical problems that may limit interconnections to other sources of water. Approvals from the MDH are required for interconnections or the reuse of water. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan267 Local Water Supply Plan 33 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Table 16. Interconnections With Other Water Supply Systems To Supply Water In An Emergency Other Water Supply System Owner Capacity (GPM & MGD) Note Any Limitations On Use List of services, equipment, supplies available to respond Eden Prairie 1,000 GPM Would take about 8 hours to set up connection. Pump would be needed to pump Eden Prairie water to Chanhassen system using fire hydrants. Chaska 1,000 GPM Approval from Chaska Required None Shorewood 1,000 GPM Approval from Shorewood Required None GPM – Gallons Per Minute MGD – Million Gallons Per Day Table 17. Utilizing Surface Water As An Alternative Source Surface Water Source Name Capacity (GPM) Capacity (MGD) Treatment Needs Note Any Limitations On Use Minnesota River N/A N/A Water would need to be treated with an R/O system. No treatment is currently available. Unknown If not covered above, describe additional emergency measures for providing water (obtaining bottled water, or steps to obtain National Guard services, etc.) The City would need to obtain and distribute bottled water for a short-term emergency. For longer term water disruptions, bulk water distribution sites would need to be set up. Local forces would take the lead on this effort. For a regional long-term water disruption, the National Guard would need to be utilized. Use of the National Guard would be requested through the Governor. Allocation and Demand Reduction Procedures Complete Table 18 by adding information about how decisions will be made to allocate water and reduce demand during an emergency. Provide information for each customer category, including its priority ranking, average day demand, and demand reduction potential for each customer category. Modify the customer categories as needed, and add additional lines if necessary. Water use categories should be prioritized in a way that is consistent with Minnesota Statutes 103G.261 (#1 is highest priority) as follows: 1.Water use for human needs such as cooking, cleaning, drinking, washing and waste disposal; use for on-farm livestock watering; and use for power production that meets contingency requirements. 2.Water use involving consumption of less than 10,000 gallons per day (usually from private wells or surface water intakes). City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan268 Local Water Supply Plan 34 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx 3.Water use for agricultural irrigation and processing of agricultural products involving consumption of more than 10,000 gallons per day (usually from private high-capacity wells or surface water intakes). 4.Water use for power production above the use provided for in the contingency plan. 5.All other water use involving consumption of more than 10,000 gallons per day. 6.Non-essential uses – car washes, golf courses, etc. Water used for human needs at hospitals, nursing homes and similar types of facilities should be designated as a high priority to be maintained in an emergency. Lower priority uses will need to address water used for human needs at other types of facilities such as hotels, office buildings, and manufacturing plants. The volume of water and other types of water uses at these facilities must be carefully considered. After reviewing the data, common sense should dictate local allocation priorities to protect domestic requirements over certain types of economic needs. Water use for lawn sprinkling, vehicle washing, golf courses, and recreation are legislatively considered non-essential. Table 18. Water use priorities Customer Category Allocation Priority Average Daily Demand (GPD) Short-Term Emergency Demand Reduction Potential (GPD) Residential 1 1,948,651 1,550,000 Institutional 2 26,987 24,000 Commercial 3 298,121 252,000 Industrial 4 187,876 161,000 Irrigation 6 390,031 0 Wholesale 5 11,396 6,000 Non-Essential 7 16,938 7,000 TOTAL NA 2,880,000 2,000,000 GPD – Gallons Per Day Tip: Calculating Emergency Demand Reduction Potential The emergency demand reduction potential for all uses will typically equal the difference between maximum use (summer demand) and base use (winter demand). In extreme emergency situations, lower priority water uses must be restricted or eliminated to protect priority domestic water requirements. Emergency demand reduction potential should be based on average day demands for customer categories within each priority class. Use the tables in Part 3 on water conservation to help you determine strategies. Complete Table 19 by selecting the triggers and actions during water supply disruption conditions. Table 19. Emergency Demand Reduction Conditions, Triggers and Actions (Select all that may apply and describe) City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan269 Local Water Supply Plan 35 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Emergency Triggers Short-term Actions Long-term Actions ☒Contamination ☒Loss of production ☒Infrastructure failure ☒Executive order by Governor ☒Additional: Power Failure ☒Supply augmentation through Other City interconnects Adopt (if not already) and enforce a critical water deficiency ordinance to penalize lawn watering, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation & other nonessential uses. Water allocation through____ ☒Meet with large water users to discuss their contingency plan. ☒Supply augmentation through Other City interconnects ☒Adopt (if not already) and enforce a critical water deficiency ordinance to penalize lawn watering, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation & other nonessential uses. Water allocation through____ ☒Meet with large water users to discuss their contingency plan. Notification Procedures Complete Table 20 by selecting trigger for informing customers regarding conservation requests, water use restrictions, and suspensions; notification frequencies; and partners that may assist in the notification process. Add rows to the table as needed. Table 20. Plan To Inform Customers Regarding Conservation Requests, Water Use Restrictions, and Suspensions Notification Trigger(s) Methods (select all that apply) Update Frequency Partners ☒Short-term demand reduction declared (< 1 year) ☒Website Email list serve ☐Social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) ☒Direct customer mailing, ☒Press release (TV, radio, newspaper), ☒Meeting with large water users (> 10% of total city use) Other: ________ ☒Daily Weekly Monthly Annually ☒Long-term ongoing demand reduction declared ☒Website Email list serve ☒Social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) ☒Direct customer mailing, ☒Press release (TV, radio, newspaper), ☒Meeting with large water users (> 10% of total city use) Other: ________ ☒Daily ☒Weekly Monthly Annually ☒Governor’s Critical water deficiency declared ☒Website Email list serve ☒Social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) ☒Direct customer mailing, ☒Press release (TV, radio, newspaper), Daily ☒Weekly Monthly Annually City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan270 Local Water Supply Plan 36 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Notification Trigger(s) Methods (select all that apply) Update Frequency Partners ☒ Meeting with large water users (> 10% of total city use) Other: ________ Enforcement Prior to a water emergency, municipal water suppliers must adopt regulations that restrict water use and outline the enforcement response plan. The enforcement response plan must outline how conditions will be monitored to know when enforcement actions are triggered, what enforcement tools will be used, who will be responsible for enforcement, and what timelines for corrective actions will be expected. Affected operations, communications, and enforcement staff must then be trained to rapidly implement those provisions during emergency conditions. Important Note: Disregard of critical water deficiency orders, even though total appropriation remains less than permitted, is adequate grounds for immediate modification of a public water supply authority’s water use permit (2013 MN Statutes 103G.291) Does the city have a critical water deficiency restriction/official control in place that includes provisions to restrict water use and enforce the restrictions? (This restriction may be an ordinance, rule, regulation, policy under a council directive, or other official control) ☒ Yes ☐ No If yes, attach the official control document to this WSP as Appendix 7. If no, the municipality must adopt such an official control within 6 months of submitting this WSP and submit it to the DNR as an amendment to this WSP. Irrespective of whether a critical water deficiency control is in place, does the public water supply utility, city manager, mayor, or emergency manager have standing authority to implement water restrictions? ☒ Yes  No If yes, cite the regulatory authority reference: Sec. 19-28a . If no, who has authority to implement water use restrictions in an emergency? City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan271 Local Water Supply Plan 37 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx PART 3. WATER CONSERVATION PLAN Minnesotans have historically benefited from the state’s abundant water supplies, reducing the need for conservation. There are however, limits to the available supplies of water and increasing threats to the quality of our drinking water. Causes of water supply limitation may include: population increases, economic trends, uneven statewide availability of groundwater, climatic changes, and degraded water quality. Examples of threats to drinking water quality include: the presence of contaminant plumes from past land use activities, exceedances of water quality standards from natural and human sources, contaminants of emerging concern, and increasing pollutant trends from nonpoint sources. There are many incentives for conserving water; conservation: •reduces the potential for pumping-induced transfer of contaminants into the deeper aquifers, which can add treatment costs •reduces the need for capital projects to expand system capacity •reduces the likelihood of water use conflicts, like well interference, aquatic habitat loss, and declining lake levels •conserves energy, because less energy is needed to extract, treat and distribute water (and less energy production also conserves water since water is use to produce energy) •maintains water supplies that can then be available during times of drought It is therefore imperative that water suppliers implement water conservation plans. The first step in water conservation is identifying opportunities for behavioral or engineering changes that could be made to reduce water use by conducting a thorough analysis of: •Water use by customer •Extraction, treatment, distribution and irrigation system efficiencies •Industrial processing system efficiencies •Regulatory and barriers to conservation •Cultural barriers to conservation •Water reuse opportunities Once accurate data is compiled, water suppliers can set achievable goals for reducing water use. A successful water conservation plan follows a logical sequence of events. The plan should address both conservation on the supply side (leak detection and repairs, metering), as well as on the demand side (reductions in usage). Implementation should be conducted in phases, starting with the most obvious and lowest-cost options. In some cases one of the early steps will be reviewing regulatory constraints to water conservation, such as lawn irrigation requirements. Outside funding and grants may be available for implementation of projects. Engage water system operators and maintenance staff and customers in brainstorming opportunities to reduce water use. Ask the question: “How can I help save water?” Progress since 2006 Is this your community’s first Water Supply Plan?  Yes ☒ No Priority 1: Significant water reduction; low cost Priority 2: Slight water reduction, low costs (low hanging fruit) Priority 2: Significant water reduction; significant costs Priority 3: Slight water reduction, significant costs (do only if necessary) City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan272 Local Water Supply Plan 38 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx If yes, describe conservation practices that you are already implementing, such as: pricing, system improvements, education, regulation, appliance retrofitting, enforcement, etc. If no, complete Table 21 to summarize conservation actions taken since the adoption of the 2006 water supply plan. Table 21. Implementation of previous ten-year Conservation Plan 2006 Plan Commitments Action Taken? Change Water Rates Structure to provide conservation pricing ☒Yes  No Water Supply System Improvements (e.g. leak repairs, valve replacements, etc.) ☒ Yes  No Educational Efforts – WaterWise Program http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/index.aspx?nid=410 ☒ Yes  No New water conservation ordinances  Yes ☒ No Rebate or Retrofitting Program (e.g. for toilet, faucets, appliances, showerheads, dish washers, washing machines, irrigation systems, rain barrels, water softeners, etc.) ☒ Yes ☐ No Enforcement - have the ability to enforce if necessary. ☒ Yes ☐ No Describe Other - The City offers no-charge irrigation audits to residents, businesses and Homeowners Associations. http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/index.aspx?NID=1130 ☒ Yes ☐ No What are the results you have seen from the actions in Table 21 and how were results measured? The City has had a conservation water rate structure in place for over 10 years. The City has been progressively increasing the top tears of the water rates over the past 5 years. The City has also been aggressive in finding leaks in the public distribution system. This year with the help of a Met. Council grant, the City has started a rebate program for high efficiency appliances and smart irrigation systems. Since 2007, the City has also had an active education program to promote the smart use of water. Also since 2007, the City has offered a no-charge irrigation audit to residents, homeowners associations and businesses. It has been somewhat difficult to quantify the effectiveness of these programs since precipitation over the last past 5 years summers have been above average. The City has seen a flat usage during the City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan273 Local Water Supply Plan 39 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx winter months even with the community growth. This can be attributed to higher efficiency appliances and fixtures. A.Triggers for Allocation and Demand Reduction Actions Complete Table 22 by checking each trigger below, as appropriate, and the actions to be taken at various levels or stages of severity. Add additional rows to the table as needed. Table 22. Short and Long-Term Demand Reduction Conditions, Triggers and Actions Objective Triggers Actions Protect Surface Water Flows Low stream flow conditions Reports of declining wetland and lake levels ☒ Other: The City is not the governing agency of Surface water flows; work with regulatory agency on trigger thresholds. Increase promotion of conservation measures ☒ Other: Work with regulatory agency on action plan. Short-term demand reduction (less than 1 year) Extremely high seasonal water demand (more than double winter demand) Loss of treatment capacity ☒ Lack of water in storage State drought plan Well interference ☐ Other: Loss of well Adopt (if not already) and enforce the critical water deficiency ordinance to restrict or prohibit lawn watering, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation & other nonessential uses. Supply augmentation through ____ Water allocation through____ ☒ Meet with large water users to discuss user’s contingency plan. Long-term demand reduction (>1 year) Per capita demand increasing Total demand increase (higher population or more industry); Water level in well(s) below elevation of _____ ☒ Other: _____________ Develop a critical water deficiency ordinance that is or can be quickly adopted to penalize lawn watering, vehicle washing, golf course and park irrigation & other nonessential uses. Enact a water waste ordinance that targets overwatering (causing water to flow off the landscape into streets, parking lots, or similar), watering impervious surfaces (streets, driveways or other hardscape areas), and negligence of known leaks, breaks, or malfunctions. ☒ Meet with large water users to discuss user’s contingency plan. ☒ Enhanced monitoring and reporting: audits, meters, billing, etc. Governor’s “Critical Water Deficiency Order” declared ☐ Describe – Declaration declared ☒ Describe – City Council would approve a water reduction plan to stop all non- essential water use consistent with water reduction goals in Table 18. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan274 Local Water Supply Plan 40 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx B. Conservation Objectives and Strategies – Key Benchmark For DNR This section establishes water conservation objectives and strategies for eight major areas of water use. Objective 1: Reduce Unaccounted (Non-Revenue) Water Loss to Less Than 10% The Minnesota Rural Waters Association, the Metropolitan Council and the Department of Natural Resources recommend that all water uses be metered. Metering can help identify high use locations and times, along with leaks within buildings that have multiple meters. It is difficult to quantify specific unmetered water use such as that associated with firefighting and system flushing or system leaks. Typically, water suppliers subtract metered water use from total water pumped to calculate unaccounted or non-revenue water loss. Is your ten-year average (2005-2014) unaccounted Water Use in Table 2 higher than 10%? ☒ Yes  No What is your leak detection monitoring schedule? (e.g. monitor 1/2 of the city lines per year) The City hires a leak detection service to bi-annually monitor about 1/2 of the cities distribution system. Water Audits - Are intended to identify, quantify and verify water and revenue losses. The volume of unaccounted-for water should be evaluated each billing cycle. The American Water Works Association (AWWA) recommends that ten percent or less of pumped water is unaccounted-for water. Water audit procedures are available from the AWWA and MN Rural Water Association www.mrwa.com. Drinking Water Revolving Loan Funds are available for purchase of new meters when new plants are built. What is the date of your most recent water audit? The City annual reviews unaccounted for water with the DNR annual report. Frequency of water audits: ☒ yearly ☐ other (specify frequency) Newer meters are installed at all large water consumers locations. The City is actively replacing older water meters as radios fail or their utility services are required. Leak detection and survey: ☒ every year  every other year periodic as needed Year last leak detection survey completed: 2014 If Table 2 shows annual water losses over 10% or an increasing trend over time, describe what actions will be taken to reach the <10% loss objective and within what timeframe. Metering - AWWA recommends that every water supplier install meters to account for all water taken into its system, along with all water distributed from its system at each customer’s point of service. An effective metering program relies upon periodic performance testing, repair, maintenance or City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan275 Local Water Supply Plan 41 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx replacement of all meters. AWWA also recommends that water suppliers conduct regular water audits to ensure accountability. Some cities install separate meters for interior and exterior water use, but some research suggests that this may not result in water conservation. Complete Table 23 by adding the requested information regarding the number, types, testing and maintenance of customer meters. Table 23. Information About Customer Meters Customer Category Number of Customers Number of Metered Connections Number of Automated Meter Readers Meter testing intervals (years) Average age/meter replacement schedule (years) Residential 7,586 7,586 7,586 None 21 / As needed Irrigation meters 314 314 313 None 8 / As needed Institutional 11 11 11 None 5 / As needed Commercial 237 237 235 None 9 / As needed Industrial 32 32 32 None 5 / As needed Public Facilities 7 7 7 None 12 / As needed Other 16 16 16 None 14 / As needed TOTALS 8,203 8,203 8,200 For unmetered systems, describe any plans to install meters or replace current meters with advanced technology meters. Provide an estimate of the cost to implement the plan and the projected water savings from implementing the plan. N/A Table 24. Water Source Meters Number of Meters Meter testing schedule (years) Number of Automated Meter Readers Average age/meter replacement schedule (years Water Source (wells/intakes) 13 5 13 10 / As needed Treatment Plant 1 5 1 9 / As needed Objective 2: Achieve Less than 75 Residential Gallons per Capita Demand (GPCD) The 2002 average residential per capita demand in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area was 75 gallons per capita per day. Is your average 2010-2015 residential per capita water demand in Table 2 more than 75? ☒ Yes  No What was your 2005 – 2014 ten-year average residential per capita water demand? 88 g/person/day Describe the water use trend over that timeframe: City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan276 Local Water Supply Plan 42 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx The City believes the per capita water use is trending down however the annual use is highly dependent on climatic variations from year to year. Complete Table 25 by checking which strategies you will use to continue reducing residential per capita demand and project a likely timeframe for completing each checked strategy (Select all that apply and add rows for additional strategies): Table 25. Strategies and Timeframe to Reduce Residential Per Capita Demand Strategy to reduce residential per capita demand Timeframe for completing work Revise city ordinances/codes to encourage or require water efficient landscaping. Proposing a daytime irrigation restriction within the next year. Revise city ordinance/codes to permit water reuse options, especially for non-potable purposes like irrigation, groundwater recharge, and industrial use. Check with plumbing authority to see if internal buildings reuse is permitted Next 5 years Revise ordinances to limit irrigation. Describe the restricted irrigation plan: Revise outdoor irrigation installations codes to require high efficiency systems (e.g. those with soil moisture sensors or programmable watering areas) in new installations or system replacements. Make water system infrastructure improvements Ongoing Offer free or reduced cost water use audits) for residential customers. On-going. City currently offers free irrigation audits for new residents, Home Owners’ Associations, and commercial users. Implement a notification system to inform customers when water availability conditions change. Provide rebates or incentives for installing water efficient appliances and/or fixtures indoors (e.g., low flow toilets, high efficiency dish washers and washing machines, showerhead and faucet aerators, water softeners, etc.) On-going. Through the Metropolitan Council Water Efficiency Grant, the City will be offering rebates for Energy Star clothes washing machine through July of 2017. Provide rebates or incentives to reduce outdoor water use (e.g., turf replacement/reduction, rain gardens, rain barrels, smart irrigation, outdoor water use meters, etc.) On-going rebates offered through the Metropolitan Council Water Efficiency Grant, for WaterSense certified irrigation controllers through July of 2017. Identify supplemental Water Resources Conduct audience-appropriate water conservation education and outreach. On-going. Educational events and presentations at schools and community events, educational articles in local newspaper, newsletters, website, and social media. Describe other plans Work with local community partners and the Metropolitan Council to start a West Metro Water Supply Work Group. This Group would: City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan277 Local Water Supply Plan 43 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Strategy to reduce residential per capita demand Timeframe for completing work •Promote the evaluation of water conflict and well interface. •Support collaborative efforts to evaluate the likelihood of significant declines in aquifer water levels. •Collaborate to support local actions that prevent the spread of contamination. •Identify opportunities for sharing information, reducing duplicate work, and partnering on projects that improve understanding about aquifer productivity and extent. •Support collaborative efforts to periodically review local water supply risks and potential alternatives to mitigate those risks. Objective 3: Achieve at least a 1.5% per year water reduction for Institutional, Industrial, Commercial, and Agricultural GPCD over the next 10 years or a 15% reduction in ten years. Complete Table 26 by checking which strategies you will used to continue reducing non-residential customer use demand and project a likely timeframe for completing each checked strategy (add rows for additional strategies). Where possible, substitute recycled water used in one process for reuse in another. (For example, spent rinse water can often be reused in a cooling tower.) Keep in mind the true cost of water is the amount on the water bill PLUS the expenses to heat, cool, treat, pump, and dispose of/discharge the water. Don’t just calculate the initial investment. Many conservation retrofits that appear to be prohibitively expensive are actually very cost-effective when amortized over the life of the equipment. Often reducing water use also saves electrical and other utility costs. Note: As of 2015, water reuse, and is not allowed by the state plumbing code, M.R. 4715 (a variance is needed). However several state agencies are addressing this issue. Table 26. Strategies and Timeframe to Reduce Institutional, Commercial Industrial, and Agricultural and Non-Revenue Use Demand Strategy to reduce total business, industry, agricultural demand Timeframe for completing work Conduct a facility water use audit for both indoor and outdoor use, including system components On-going, free irrigation audits provided for business, industry, agricultural, and commercial users. Install enhanced meters capable of automated readings to detect spikes in consumption On-going. Compare facility water use to related industry benchmarks, if available (e.g., meat processing, dairy, fruit and vegetable, beverage, textiles, paper/pulp, metals, technology, petroleum refining etc.), N/A Install water conservation fixtures and appliances or change processes to conserve water Repair leaking system components (e.g., pipes, valves) As needed. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan278 Local Water Supply Plan 44 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Strategy to reduce total business, industry, agricultural demand Timeframe for completing work Investigate the reuse of reclaimed water (e.g., stormwater, wastewater effluent, process wastewater, etc.) On-going. Reduce outdoor water use (e.g., turf replacement/ reduction, rain gardens, rain barrels, smart irrigation, outdoor water use meters, etc.) On-going. Train employees how to conserve water On-going. Implement a notification system to inform non- residential customers when water availability conditions change. Rainwater catchment systems intended to supply uses such as water closets, urinals, trap primers for floor drains and floor sinks, industrial processes, water features, vehicle washing facilities, cooling tower makeup, and similar uses shall be approved by the commissioner. Proposed plumbing code 4714.1702.1 http://www.dli.mn.gov/PDF/docket/4714rule.pdf On-going. Describe other plans: New topsoil requirements on all new development, including business, commercial, and industry. Objective 4: Achieve a Decreasing Trend in Total Per Capita Demand Include as Appendix 8 one graph showing total per capita water demand for each customer category (i.e., residential, institutional, commercial, industrial) from 2005-2014 and add the calculated/estimated linear trend for the next 10 years. Describe the trend for each customer category; explain the reason(s) for the trends, and where trends are increasing. Decreased/flat use since 2014, largely due to annual precipitation at normal/above normal conditions. Objective 5: Reduce Peak Day Demand so that the Ratio of Average Maximum day to the Average Day is less than 2.6 Is the ratio of average 2005-2014 maximum day demand to average 2005-2014 average day demand reported in Table 2 more than 2.6? ☐ Yes ☒ No Calculate a ten year average (2005 – 2014) of the ratio of maximum day demand to average day demand: 2.42 The position of the DNR has been that a peak day/average day ratio that is above 2.6 for in summer indicates that the water being used for irrigation by the residents in a community is too large and that efforts should be made to reduce the peak day use by the community. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan279 Local Water Supply Plan 45 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx It should be noted that by reducing the peak day use, communities can also reduce the amount of infrastructure that is required to meet the peak day use. This infrastructure includes new wells, new water towers which can be costly items. Objective 6: Implement a Conservation Water Rate Structure and/or a Uniform Rate Structure with a Water Conservation Program City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan280 Local Water Supply Plan 46 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Water Conservation Program Municipal water suppliers serving over 1,000 people are required to adopt demand reduction measures that include a conservation rate structure, or a uniform rate structure with a conservation program that achieves demand reduction. These measures must achieve demand reduction in ways that reduce water demand, water losses, peak water demands, and nonessential water uses. These measures must be approved before a community may request well construction approval from the Department of Health or before requesting an increase in water appropriations permit volume (Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.291, Subd. 3 and 4). Rates should be adjusted on a regular basis to ensure that revenue of the system is adequate under reduced demand scenarios. If a municipal water supplier intends to use a Uniform Rate Structure, a community-wide Water Conservation Program that will achieve demand reduction must be provided. Current Water Rates Include a copy of the actual rate structure in Appendix 9 or list current water rates including base/service fees and volume charges below. Volume included in base rate or service charge: ___5,000__ gallons or ____ cubic feet ___ other Frequency of billing: ☒ Monthly (Optional)  Bimonthly Quarterly Other: Monthly billing upon request. Water Rate Evaluation Frequency: every year  every ___ years  no schedule Date of last rate change: 1/1/2016 Table 27. Rate structures for each customer category (Select all that apply and add additional rows as needed) Customer Category Conservation Billing Strategies in Use * Conservation Neutral Billing Strategies in Use ** Non-Conserving Billing Strategies in Use *** Residential Monthly Billing  Increasing block rates (volume tiered rates)  Seasonal rates  Time of Use rates Water bills reported in gallons  Individualized goal rates  Excess Use rates  Drought surcharge  Use water bill to provide comparisons  Service charge not based on water volume  Other (describe)  Uniform Odd/Even day watering  Service charge based on water volume  Declining block  Flat  Other (describe) Commercial/ Industrial/ Institutional Monthly Billing  Increasing block rates  Seasonal rates  Time of Use rates Bill water use in gallons  Uniform  Service charge based on water volume  Declining block  Flat  Other (describe) City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan281 Local Water Supply Plan 47 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Customer Category Conservation Billing Strategies in Use * Conservation Neutral Billing Strategies in Use ** Non-Conserving Billing Strategies in Use ***  Individualized goal rates  Excess Use rates  Drought surcharge  Use water bill to provide comparisons  Service charge not based on water volume Other (describe): City uses meter software to detect leaks, then sends this notification to the user.  Other * Rate Structures components that may promote water conservation: •Monthly billing: is encouraged to help people see their water usage so they can consider changing behavior. •Increasing block rates (also known as a tiered residential rate structure): Typically, these have at least three tiers: should have at least three tiers. o The first tier is for the winter average water use. o The second tier is the year-round average use, which is lower than typical summer use. This rate should be set to cover the full cost of service. o The third tier should be above the average annual use and should be priced high enough to encourage conservation, as should any higher tiers. For this to be effective, the difference in block rates should be significant. •Seasonal rate: higher rates in summer to reduce peak demands. •Time of Use rates: lower rates for off peak water use. •Bill water use in gallons: this allows customers to compare their use to average rates. •Individualized goal rates: typically used for industry, business or other large water users to promote water conservation if they keep within agreed upon goals. Excess Use rates: if water use goes above an agreed upon amount this higher rate is charged. •Drought surcharge: an extra fee is charged for guaranteed water use during drought. •Use water bill to provide comparisons: simple graphics comparing individual use over time or compare individual use to others. •Service charge or base fee that does not include a water volume – a base charge or fee to cover universal city expenses that are not customer dependent and/or to provide minimal water at a lower rate (e.g., an amount less than the average residential per capita demand for the water supplier for the last 5 years). •Emergency rates -A community may have a separate conservation rate that only goes into effect when the community or governor declares a drought emergency. These higher rates can help to protect the city budgets during times of significantly less water usage. **Conservation Neutral** •Uniform rate: rate per unit used is the same regardless of the volume used. •Odd/even day watering –This approach reduces peak demand on a daily basis for system operation, but it does not reduce overall water use. *** Non-Conserving *** •Service charge or base fee with water volume: an amount of water larger than the average residential per capita demand for the water supplier for the last 5 years. •Declining block rate: the rate per unit used decreases as water use increases. •Flat rate: one fee regardless of how much water is used (usually unmetered). City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan282 Local Water Supply Plan 48 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Provide justification for any conservation neutral or non-conserving rate structures. If intending to adopt a conservation rate structure, include the timeframe to do so: N/A Objective 7: Additional strategies to Reduce Water Use and Support Wellhead Protection Planning Development and redevelopment projects can provide additional water conservation opportunities, such as the actions listed below. If a Uniform Rate Structure is in place, the water supplier must provide a Water Conservation Program that includes at least two of the actions listed below. Check those actions that you intent to implement within the next 10 years. Table 28. Additional Strategies to Reduce Water Use & Support Wellhead Protection  Participate in the GreenStep Cities Program, including implementation of at least one of the 20 “Best Practices” for water  Prepare a Master Plan for Smart Growth (compact urban growth that avoids sprawl) Prepare a Comprehensive Open Space Plan (areas for parks, green spaces, natural areas)  Adopt a Water Use Restriction Ordinance (lawn irrigation, car washing, pools, etc.)  Adopt an Outdoor Lawn Irrigation Ordinance  Adopt a Private well Ordinance (private wells in a city must comply with water restrictions) Implement a Stormwater Management Program Adopt Non-Zoning Wetlands Ordinance (can further protect wetlands beyond state/federal laws-for vernal pools, buffer areas, restrictions on filling or alterations)  Adopt a Water Offset Program (primarily for new development or expansion) Implement a Water Conservation Outreach Program  Hire a Water Conservation Coordinator (part-time) Implement a Rebate program for water efficient appliances, fixtures, or outdoor water management Other: In 2016 the City will be replacing traditional irrigation controllers with a central, weather-based controller, WaterSense certified by the EPA for all city-irrigated parks and greenspace. The City is also conducting studies on areas within the City where stormwater re- use projects can be implemented, both public and private. The City has adopted an ordinance to require 6” of topsoil for new developments. This ordinance also include requiring the builder to deposit cash escrow with the City and have the City inspect the yard before sod is installed. Objective 8: Tracking Success: How will you track or measure success through the next ten years? The City will continue to track per capita water use as well as trends in high-user consumption and commercial/industrial use, taking annual precipitation data and trends into account. Trends are then to be studied, and conservation programs and efforts that should be adjusted accordingly. Discussions with the District Hydrologist will also be incorporated as needed. Recommendations will then be made to City Council for implementation. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan283 Local Water Supply Plan 49 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Tip: The process to monitor demand reduction and/or a rate structure includes: a)The DNR District Hydrologist or Groundwater Appropriation Hydrologist will call or visit the community the first 1-3 years after the water supply plan is completed. b)They will discuss what activities the community is doing to conserve water and if they feel their actions are successful. The Water Supply Plan, Part 3 tables and responses will guide the discussion. For example, they will discuss efforts to reduce unaccounted for water loss if that is a problem, or go through Tables 33, 34 and 35 to discuss new initiatives. c)The city representative and the hydrologist will discuss total per capita water use, residential per capita water use, and business/industry use. They will note trends. d)They will also discuss options for improvement and/or collect case studies of success stories to share with other communities. One option may be to change the rate structure, but there are many other paths to successful water conservation. e)If appropriate, they will cooperatively develop a simple work plan for the next few years, targeting a couple areas where the city might focus efforts. A.Regulation Complete Table 29 by selecting which regulations are used to reduce demand and improve water efficiencies. Add additional rows as needed. Copies of adopted regulations or proposed restrictions or should be included in Appendix 10 (a list with hyperlinks is acceptable). Table 29. Regulations for Short-Term Reductions in Demand and Long-Term Improvements in Water Efficiencies Regulations Utilized When is it applied (in effect)? Rainfall sensors required on landscape irrigation systems Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared Emergencies Water efficient plumbing fixtures required New Development Replacement  Rebate Programs  Critical/Emergency Water Deficiency ordinance  Only during declared Emergencies Watering restriction requirements (time of day, allowable days, etc.) Odd/Even  2 days/week  Only during declared Emergencies  Water waste prohibited (for example, having a fine for irrigators spraying on the street)  Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared Emergencies Limitations on turf areas (requiring lots to have 10% - 25% of the space in natural areas) New Development Shoreland/zoning  Other Soil preparation requirements (after construction, requiring topsoil to be applied to promote good root growth) New Development  Construction Projects  Other Tree ratios (requiring a certain number of trees per square foot of lawn) New development Shoreland/zoning  Other  Permit to fill swimming pool and/or requiring pools to be covered (to prevent evaporation)  Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared Emergencies City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan284 Local Water Supply Plan 50 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Regulations Utilized When is it applied (in effect)?  Ordinances that permit stormwater irrigation, reuse of water, or other alternative water use (Note: be sure to check current plumbing codes for updates)  Describe Encouraged, however no ordinance in place. B.Retrofitting Programs Education and incentive programs aimed at replacing inefficient plumbing fixtures and appliances can help reduce per capita water use, as well as energy costs. It is recommended that municipal water suppliers develop a long-term plan to retrofit public buildings with water efficient plumbing fixtures and appliances. Some water suppliers have developed partnerships with organizations having similar conservation goals, such as electric or gas suppliers, to develop cooperative rebate and retrofit programs. A study by the AWWA Research Foundation (Residential End Uses of Water, 1999) found that the average indoor water use for a non-conserving home is 69.3 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). The average indoor water use in a conserving home is 45.2 gpcd and most of the decrease in water use is related to water efficient plumbing fixtures and appliances that can reduce water, sewer and energy costs. In Minnesota, certain electric and gas providers are required (Minnesota Statute 216B.241) to fund programs that will conserve energy resources and some utilities have distributed water efficient showerheads to customers to help reduce energy demands required to supply hot water. Retrofitting Programs Complete Table 30 by checking which water uses are targeted, the outreach methods used, the measures used to identify success, and any participating partners. Table 30. Retrofitting Programs (Select All That Apply) Water Use Targets Outreach Methods Partners low flush toilets, toilet leak tablets, low flow showerheads, faucet aerators; education about  free distribution of  rebate for  other  Gas company  Electric company  Watershed organization water conserving washing machines, dish washers, water softeners; education about  free distribution of rebate for  other  Gas company  Electric company  Watershed organization rain gardens, rain barrels, native/drought tolerant landscaping, etc. education about  free distribution of rebate for  other  Gas company  Electric company  Watershed organization Briefly discuss measures of success from the above table (e.g. number of items distributed, dollar value of rebates, gallons of water conserved, etc.): Number of rebates are tracked quarterly, along with cost, and estimated water savings. Number of coupons for rain barrels are tracked annually. Drought-tolerant landscape rebates are tracked for area, cost, and number of, annually. Education is measured in number of messages/articles/pamphlets City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan285 Local Water Supply Plan 51 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx distributed, including social media, annually. The City is currently participating in the Metropolitan Council’s Water Efficiency Grant Program. C.Education and Information Programs Customer education should take place in three different circumstances. First, customers should be provided information on how to conserve water and improve water use efficiencies. Second, information should be provided at appropriate times to address peak demands. Third, emergency notices and educational materials about how to reduce water use should be available for quick distribution during an emergency. Proposed Education Programs Complete Table 31 by selecting which methods are used to provide water conservation and information, including the frequency of program components. Select all that apply and add additional lines as needed. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan286 Local Water Supply Plan 52 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Table 31. Current and Proposed Education Programs Education Methods General summary of topics #/Year Frequency Billing inserts or tips printed on the actual bill Indoor fixture leaks 500 average Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Consumer Confidence Reports Drinking Water Quality/Water Conservation 25,000 average Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Press releases to traditional local news outlets (e.g., newspapers, radio and TV) Water Conservation Programs/Stormwater 1-2 Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Social media distribution (e.g., emails, Facebook, Twitter) Water Conservation tips/Programs offered/Stormwater 10 avg. Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Paid advertisements (e.g., billboards, print media, TV, radio, web sites, etc.) Local Newspaper 1-2  Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Presentations to community groups Water Conservation/Stormwater 2-3 Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Staff training Water Conservation 3-4 Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Facility tours  Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Displays and exhibits Water Conservation 3-4 Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Marketing rebate programs (e.g., indoor fixtures & appliances and outdoor practices) City rebate programs 12-15 Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Community news letters Water Conservation 4 Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Direct mailings (water audit/retrofit kits, showerheads, brochures)  Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan287 Local Water Supply Plan 53 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Education Methods General summary of topics #/Year Frequency Information kiosk at utility and public buildings  Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Public Service Announcements  Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Cable TV Programs  Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Demonstration projects (landscaping or plumbing) Water re-use 1 Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies K-12 Education programs (Project Wet, Drinking Water Institute, presentations) Project Wet, Water Conservation 2 Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Community Events (children’s water festivals, environmental fairs) 4th of July celebration: Float in parade and Display/booth on Water Conservation. Partner with other agencies throughout the year to provide presentations/displays on water conservation & stormwater at community events and classes including Children’s Water Festival, MN Landscape Arboretum Events, etc. 4-5 Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Community education classes City partners with the MN Landscape Arboretum to provide classes on water conservation. 0-1 Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Water Week promotions  Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Website (include address: http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/index.aspx? NID=410 ) Water Conservation Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Targeted efforts (large volume users, users with large increases) Letters to high-users, education with water bill to users with large increases. Encourage commercial high-users to 1-2 Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan288 Local Water Supply Plan 54 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Education Methods General summary of topics #/Year Frequency partner with the City on stormwater re-use projects. Notices of ordinances  Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Emergency conservation notices Conservation, additional water use restrictions.  Ongoing  Seasonal Only during declared emergencies Other:  Ongoing  Seasonal  Only during declared emergencies Briefly discuss what future education and information activities your community is considering in the future: The City plans to expand on its community education outlets including cable TV, social media, and events. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan289 Local Water Supply Plan 55 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Part 4. ITEMS FOR METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNITIES Minnesota Statute 473.859 requires WSPs to be completed for all local units of government in the seven-county Metropolitan Area as part of the local comprehensive planning process. Much of the information in Parts 1-3 addresses water demand for the next 10 years. However, additional information is needed to address water demand through 2040, which will make the WSP consistent with the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act, upon which the local comprehensive plans are based. This Part 4 provides guidance to complete the WSP in a way that addresses plans for water supply through 2040. A.Water Demand Projections through 2040 Complete Table 7 in Part 1D by filling in information about long-term water demand projections through 2040. Total Community Population projections should be consistent with the community’s system statement, which can be found on the Metropolitan Council’s website and which was sent to the community in September 2015. Projected Average Day, Maximum Day, and Annual Water Demands may either be calculated using the method outlined in Appendix 2 of the 2015 Master Water Supply Plan or by a method developed by the individual water supplier. B.Potential Water Supply Issues Complete Table 10 in Part 1E by providing information about the potential water supply issues in your community, including those that might occur due to 2040 projected water use. The Master Water Supply Plan provides information about potential issues for your community in Appendix 1 (Water Supply Profiles). This resource may be useful in completing Table 10. You may document results of local work done to evaluate impact of planned uses by attaching a feasibility assessment or providing a citation and link to where the plan is available electronically. C.Proposed Alternative Approaches to Meet Extended Water Demand Projections Complete Table 12 in Part 1F with information about potential water supply infrastructure impacts (such as replacements, expansions or additions to wells/intakes, water storage and treatment capacity, distribution systems, and emergency interconnections) of extended plans for development and redevelopment, in 10-year increments through 2040. It may be useful to refer to information in the community’s local Land Use Plan, if available. Complete Table 14 in Part 1F by checking each approach your community is considering to meet future demand. For each approach your community is considering, provide information about the amount of City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan290 Local Water Supply Plan 56 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx future water demand to be met using that approach, the timeframe to implement the approach, potential partners, and current understanding of the key benefits and challenges of the approach. As challenges are being discussed, consider the need for: evaluation of geologic conditions (mapping, aquifer tests, modeling), identification of areas where domestic wells could be impacted, measurement and analysis of water levels & pumping rates, triggers & associated actions to protect water levels, etc. D.Value-Added Water Supply Planning Efforts (Optional) The following information is not required to be completed as part of the local water supply plan, but completing this can help strengthen source water protection throughout the region and help Metropolitan Council and partners in the region to better support local efforts. Source Water Protection Strategies Does a Drinking Water Supply Management Area for a neighboring public water supplier overlap your community? Yes  No If you answered no, skip this section. If you answered yes, please complete Table 32 with information about new water demand or land use planning-related local controls that are being considered to provide additional protection in this area. Table 32. Local controls and schedule to protect Drinking Water Supply Management Areas Local Control Schedule to Implement Potential Partners None at this time In conjunction with future West Metro Water Supply Group Future West Metro Water Supply Group  Comprehensive planning that guides development in vulnerable drinking water supply management areas  Zoning overlay  Other: Technical assistance From your community’s perspective, what are the most important topics for the Metropolitan Council to address, guided by the region’s Metropolitan Area Water Supply Advisory Committee and Technical Advisory Committee, as part of its ongoing water supply planning role? Coordination of state, regional and local water supply planning roles Regional water use goals Water use reporting standards Regional and sub-regional partnership opportunities Identifying and prioritizing data gaps and input for regional and sub-regional analyses Others: _________________________________________________________________ City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan291 Local Water Supply Plan 57 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx GLOSSARY Agricultural/Irrigation Water Use - Water used for crop and non-crop irrigation, livestock watering, chemigation, golf course irrigation, landscape and athletic field irrigation. Average Daily Demand - The total water pumped during the year divided by 365 days. Calcareous Fen - Calcareous fens are rare and distinctive wetlands dependent on a constant supply of cold groundwater. Because they are dependent on groundwater and are one of the rarest natural communities in the United States, they are a protected resource in MN. Approximately 200 have been located in Minnesota. They may not be filled, drained or otherwise degraded. Commercial/Institutional Water Use - Water used by motels, hotels, restaurants, office buildings, commercial facilities and institutions (both civilian and military). Consider maintaining separate institutional water use records for emergency planning and allocation purposes. Water used by multi- family dwellings, apartment buildings, senior housing complexes, and mobile home parks should be reported as Residential Water Use. Commercial/Institutional/Industrial (C/I/I) Water Sold - The sum of water delivered for commercial/ institutional or industrial purposes. Conservation Rate Structure - A rate structure that encourages conservation and may include increasing block rates, seasonal rates, time of use rates, individualized goal rates, or excess use rates. If a conservation rate is applied to multifamily dwellings, the rate structure must consider each residential unit as an individual user. A community may have a separate conservation rate that only goes into effect when the community or governor declares a drought emergency. These higher rates can help to protect the city budgets during times of significantly less water usage. Date of Maximum Daily Demand - The date of the maximum (highest) water demand. Typically this is a day in July or August. Declining Rate Structure - Under a declining block rate structure, a consumer pays less per additional unit of water as usage increases. This rate structure does not promote water conservation. Distribution System - Water distribution systems consist of an interconnected series of pipes, valves, storage facilities (water tanks, water towers, reservoirs), water purification facilities, pumping stations, flushing hydrants, and components that convey drinking water and meeting fire protection needs for cities, homes, schools, hospitals, businesses, industries and other facilities. Flat Rate Structure - Flat fee rates do not vary by customer characteristics or water usage. This rate structure does not promote water conservation. Industrial Water Use - Water used for thermonuclear power (electric utility generation) and other industrial use such as steel, chemical and allied products, paper and allied products, mining, and petroleum refining. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan292 Local Water Supply Plan 58 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Low Flow Fixtures/Appliances - Plumbing fixtures and appliances that significantly reduce the amount of water released per use are labeled “low flow”. These fixtures and appliances use just enough water to be effective, saving excess, clean drinking water that usually goes down the drain. Maximum Daily Demand - The maximum (highest) amount of water used in one day. Metered Residential Connections - The number of residential connections to the water system that have meters. For multifamily dwellings, report each residential unit as an individual user. Percent Unmetered/Unaccounted For - Unaccounted for water use is the volume of water withdrawn from all sources minus the volume of water delivered. This value represents water “lost” by miscalculated water use due to inaccurate meters, water lost through leaks, or water that is used but unmetered or otherwise undocumented. Water used for public services such as hydrant flushing, ice skating rinks, and public swimming pools should be reported under the category “Water Supplier Services”. Population Served - The number of people who are served by the community’s public water supply system. This includes the number of people in the community who are connected to the public water supply system, as well as people in neighboring communities who use water supplied by the community’s public water supply system. It should not include residents in the community who have private wells or get their water from neighboring water supply. Residential Connections - The total number of residential connections to the water system. For multifamily dwellings, report each residential unit as an individual user. Residential Per Capita Demand - The total residential water delivered during the year divided by the population served divided by 365 days. Residential Water Use - Water used for normal household purposes such as drinking, food preparation, bathing, washing clothes and dishes, flushing toilets, and watering lawns and gardens. Should include all water delivered to single family private residences, multi-family dwellings, apartment buildings, senior housing complexes, mobile home parks, etc. Smart Meter - Smart meters can be used by municipalities or by individual homeowners. Smart metering generally indicates the presence of one or more of the following: •Smart irrigation water meters are controllers that look at factors such as weather, soil, slope, etc. and adjust watering time up or down based on data. Smart controllers in a typical summer will reduce water use by 30%-50%. Just changing the spray nozzle to new efficient models can reduce water use by 40%. •Smart Meters on customer premises that measure consumption during specific time periods and communicate it to the utility, often on a daily basis. •A communication channel that permits the utility, at a minimum, to obtain meter reads on demand, to ascertain whether water has recently been flowing through the meter and onto the City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan293 Local Water Supply Plan 59 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx premises, and to issue commands to the meter to perform specific tasks such as disconnecting or restricting water flow. Total Connections - The number of connections to the public water supply system. Total Per Capita Demand - The total amount of water withdrawn from all water supply sources during the year divided by the population served divided by 365 days. Total Water Pumped - The cumulative amount of water withdrawn from all water supply sources during the year. Total Water Delivered - The sum of residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, water supplier services, wholesale and other water delivered. Ultimate (Full Build-Out) - Time period representing the community’s estimated total amount and location of potential development, or when the community is fully built out at the final planned density. Unaccounted (Non-revenue) Loss - See definitions for “percent unmetered/unaccounted for loss”. Uniform Rate Structure - A uniform rate structure charges the same price-per-unit for water usage beyond the fixed customer charge, which covers some fixed costs. The rate sends a price signal to the customer because the water bill will vary by usage. Uniform rates by class charge the same price-per- unit for all customers within a customer class (e.g. residential or non-residential). This price structure is generally considered less effective in encouraging water conservation. Water Supplier Services - Water used for public services such as hydrant flushing, ice skating rinks, public swimming pools, city park irrigation, back-flushing at water treatment facilities, and/or other uses. Water Used for Nonessential Purposes - Water used for lawn irrigation, golf course and park irrigation, car washes, ornamental fountains, and other non-essential uses. Wholesale Deliveries - The amount of water delivered in bulk to other public water suppliers. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan294 Local Water Supply Plan 60 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Acronyms and Initialisms AWWA – American Water Works Association C/I/I – Commercial/Institutional/Industrial CIP – Capital Improvement Plan GIS – Geographic Information System GPCD – Gallons per capita per day GWMA – Groundwater Management Area – North and East Metro, Straight River, Bonanza, MDH – Minnesota Department of Health MGD – Million gallons per day MG – Million gallons MGL – Maximum Contaminant Level MnTAP – Minnesota Technical Assistance Program (University of Minnesota) MPARS – MN/DNR Permitting and Reporting System (new electronic permitting system) MRWA – Minnesota Rural Waters Association SWP – Source Water Protection WHP – Wellhead Protection City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan295 Local Water Supply Plan 61 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx APPENDICES TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE WATER SUPPLIER Appendix 1: Well records and maintenance summaries – see Part 1C Include copies of well records and maintenance summary for each well that has occurred since your last approved plan in 2006 Appendix 2: Water level monitoring plan – see Part 1E Appendix 3: Water level graphs for each water supply well - see Part 1E Appendix 4: Capital Improvement Plan - see Part 1E Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List – see Part 2C Appendix 6: Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services – see Part 2C Appendix 7: Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Ordinance – see Part 2C Appendix 8: Graph showing annual per capita water demand for each customer category during the last ten-years – see Part 3 Objective 4 Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure – see Part 3 Objective 6 Appendix 10: Adopted or proposed regulations to reduce demand or improve water efficiency – see Part 3 Objective 7 Appendix 11: Implementation Checklist – summary of all the actions that a community is doing, or proposes to do, including estimated implementation dates – see www.mndnr.gov/watersupplyplans City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan296 Local Water Supply Plan 62 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Appendix 1: Well Records and Maintenance Summaries School Well – Sealed 4/6/11 #292626. Well #2 - Pulled and inspected, televised, various items repaired replaced, pump setting lowered from 180’ to 220’- July 2007. Pulled and inspected various items repaired/replaced - March 2016. Well #3 - Pump set lowered 40 feet - May 2008. Well #4 - Pulled and inspected, televised, various items repaired/replaced - April 2010. New VFD installed 2010. New well flow meter installed Feb 2016. Well #5 - Inactive well, Maintenance Permit # 377792. Well #6 - Inactive well, Maintenance Permit # 377779. Well #7 - Pulled and inspected, televised, various items repaired/replaced - 2008. Installed emergency transfer switch and generator plugs for emergency generation - June 2009. Installed new exterior roof - April 2016. Installed new VFD - November 2016. Well #9 - Pulled inspected, televised, various items repaired/replaced - May 2011. Well #10 - Installed - April 2006. Screen cleaned - March 2010. VFD replaced - January 2010. Well #11 - Installed March 2006. Well #12 - Installed June 2008. Well #13 - Installed August 2008. Well #14 - Installed May 2010. Well #15 - Installed March 2015. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan297 Local Water Supply Plan 63 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Appendix 2: Water Level Monitoring Plan MN Unique Well # or Surface Water ID Type of monitoring point Monitoring program Frequency of monitoring Monitoring Method Unique ID #220976 Well #2 X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir  Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique ID #200195 Well #3 X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique ID #180913 Well #4 X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique ID #471308 Well #5 X production well (maintenance permit well)  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly X annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique ID #494519 Well #6 X production well (maintenance permit well)  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other hourly  daily X monthly quarterly annually  SCADA X grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique #541545 Well #7 X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique #578953 Well #8 X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique #709304 Well #9 X production well  observation well  source water intake Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan298 Local Water Supply Plan 64 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx MN Unique Well # or Surface Water ID Type of monitoring point Monitoring program Frequency of monitoring Monitoring Method  source water reservoir annually Unique #737048 Well #10 X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique ID #737049 Well #11 175 W78th St. X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique #760936 Well #12 7610 S. Shore Dr. X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique #760937 Well #13 55 Lake Dr. E. X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique ID #775541 Well #14 730 Lake Dr. X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique ID # 810696 Well #15 1700 Lake Lucy Rd. X production well  observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique #775542 Monitoring Well A 9405 Great Plains Blvd.  production well X observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge Unique # Monitoring Well B 9405 Great Plains Blvd.  production well X observation well  source water intake  source water reservoir Routine MDH sampling X Routine water utility sampling  other X continuous hourly  daily  monthly quarterly annually X SCADA  grab sampling  steel tape  stream gauge City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan299 Local Water Supply Plan 65 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Appendix 3 – Water Level Graphs for Each Water Supply Well City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan300 Local Water Supply Plan 66 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan301 Local Water Supply Plan 67 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan302 Local Water Supply Plan 68 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan303 Local Water Supply Plan 69 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan304 Local Water Supply Plan 70 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Appendix 4: Capital Improvement Plan City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan305 Local Water Supply Plan 71 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List Chanhassen Utilities Emergency Telephone List Emergency Response Team Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone Emergency Response Lead Kevin Crooks 952-227-1311 612-490-7776 Alternate Emergency Response Lead Brett Martinson 952-227-1313 612-490-8705 Water Operator Craig Carlson 952-227-1701 612-217-3442 Alternate Water Operator Jerry Johnson 952-227-1300 612-369-3461 Public Communications Chelsea Petersen 952-227-1118 651-319-1350 State and Local Emergency Response Contacts Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone State Incident Duty Officer Minnesota Duty Officer 800/422-0798 Out State 651-649-5451 Metro County Emergency Director Carver County Sheriff Dept.911 911 National Guard Minnesota Duty Officer 800/422-0798 Out State 651-649-5451 Metro Mayor/Board Chair Denny Laufenburger 952-227-1100 Fire Chief Don Johnson 952-227-1152 952-607-7244 Sheriff Carver County Sheriff 911 911 Police Chief Carver County Sheriff 911 911 Ambulance 911 911 911 Hospital 212 Medical Center 952-361-2447 State and Local Agencies Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone MDH District Engineer Amy Lynch 507-344-2713 507-990-2157 MDH Drinking Water Protection 651-201-4700 State Testing Laboratory Minnesota Duty Officer 800/422-0798 Out State 651-649-5451 Metro MPCA Municipal Wastewater 681-296-6300 800-657-3864 DNR Area Hydrologist Jack Gleason 651-259-5764 County Water Planner Carver County Soil and Water (952) 466-5230 Utilities Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone Electric Company Xcel Energy 800-481-4700 800-641-4400 Gas Company Centerpoint Energy 612-321-4939 Telephone Company Centurylink 952-222-3496 Gopher State One Call Utility Locations 800-252-1166 651-454-0002 Highway Department MnDOT 651-234-7919 Mutual Aid Agreements Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone Emergency Water Connection Eden Prairie 952-294-5906 952-646-8530 Emergency Water Connection Chaska 952-227-7733 952-448-4335 Emergency Water Connection Shorewood 952-960-7913 952-292-2970 Materials HD Supply 952-974-8115 952-937-9666 Materials Ferguson Waterworks 763-560-5200 Technical/Contracted Services/Supplies Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone MRWA Technical Services MN Rural Water Association 800-367-6792 Well Driller/Repair EH Renner 763-427-6100 Pump Repair General Repair Service 651-766-0874 800-767-5151 Electrician A-1 Electric 952-442-5332 Backhoe Parrott Excavating 612-290-7346 Chemical Feed Hawkins Chemical 612-802-4562 Generator Ziegler 952-887-4525 Laboratory Engel Water Testing 952-955-1800 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan306 Local Water Supply Plan 72 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Appendix 6: Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services None – No local Agreement to attach. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan307 Local Water Supply Plan 73 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Appendix 7: Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Ordinance Sec. 19-28. - Water use restriction. (a) Use of the city water supply system for lawn and garden sprinkling, irrigation, car washing or other nonpotable uses shall be limited to an odd-even schedule corresponding to property address, effective each year from May 1 to September 30. Whenever the city council or, on a temporary basis, the public works director and/or the city manager or city manager's designee, shall determine that a shortage of the water supply threatens the city, they may further limit the days and hours during which water may be used from the city water supply system. Special permit consideration will be given for those property owners with new seed or sod if in the opinion of the public works director sufficient water for such permits is available. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan308 Local Water Supply Plan 74 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Appendix 8: Annual Per Capita Water Demand For Each Customer Category During The Last Ten Years *Due to Finance Dept. software update only six years of accurate data available. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan309 Local Water Supply Plan 75 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure CITY OF CHANHASSEN WATER RATE STRUCTURE UTILITY RATES (AS OF JANUARY 01, 2016): FLAT RATE (REGARDLESS IF WATER IS USED OR NOT)$8.43 FIRST 6,000 GALLONS (PER 1,000)$1.16 6,001-24,000 GALLONS (PER 1,000)$2.32 24,001-48,000 GALLONS (PER 1,000)$2.90 48,001-99,000 GALLONS (PER 1,000)$3.37 OVER 99,001 GALLONS (PER 1,000)$4.28 City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan310 Local Water Supply Plan 76 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Appendix 10: Adopted or Proposed Regulations to Reduce Demand or Improve Water Efficiency None – No new or proposed demand reduction regulations. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan311 Local Water Supply Plan 77 \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\eng\water supply plan (formerly water emergency conservation plan)\wsp chanhassen1981-5089 111816.docx Appendix 11: Implementation Checklist – Summary of All the Actions That a Community is Doing, or Proposes To Do, Including Estimated Implementation Dates Chanhassen will continue strident efforts in water accountability and conservation. In 2014 the City upgraded all meter radios to “smart” meter technology which is a fixed based system. This system allows the City to notify consumers if a possible leak is detected. The City is in the process of replacing older domestic meters. The City has also installed several new well mag meters. The City annually inspects sections of town for leaks which has proven effective. Conservation and public education also continues to be fostered by WaterWise rebate programs and in unique ways like irrigation audits and expanded water re-use in new construction. The City has partnered with the watershed district on installing a water reuse irrigation system at Chanhassen High School which will be constructed in 20017. The City planning to install a water reuse system for the Lake Susan baseball field in 2018. The City is also looking at water reuse system for the downtown which would be installed with a street reconstruction project in 2012. Chanhassen will move forward using all available methods and best practices toward water sustainability into the future. City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan312