Loading...
CAS-01_MISSION HILLS SENIOR LIVING - 8600 GREAT PLAINS BOULEVARD FILE 1 OF 2 REZ/SUB/SITE (3)February 27, 2015 OF �Crff CI�NI�ASSEN Michael Hoagberg 17550 Hemlock Avenue 7700 Market Boulevard Lakeville, MN 55044 PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Mission Hills Senior Living— Planning Case 2015-01 Administration Dear Mr. Hoagberg: Phone 952.227,1100 Fax:952.227.1110 This letter is to formally notify you that on February 23, 2015, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motions: Building Inspections Phone:952.227.1180 1. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT Fax:952.227.1190 1 Engineering "The City Council approves the Planned Unit Development amendment in the Phone: 952.227.1160 attached ordinance for Mission Hills to allow High Density Use on the site and set Fax:952.227.1170 standards for the structures as shown below (amendments are shown in bold and highlighted in gray) with the following conditions, and adoption of the attached Finance Findings of Fact. Phone:952.227.1140 Fax:952.227.1110 1. The site must comply with the DNR Shoreland Rules. Park :Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 2 The site shall comply with the following standards: P Y g Fax:952.227.1110 Mission Hills Zoning Standards Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard a. Intent Phone:952,227.1400 Fax: 952.227,1404 The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD Enomixed density Planning a housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards Natural Resources while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required Phone: 952.227.1130 to be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed Fax: 952.2271110 through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the mixed density housing Public works development shall comply with the requirements of the R-8, Mixed Medium Density 7Park Place District. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards belowphe se�tereiel Phone: Phone: 952.227.1300 - _ � ;the .. Neighbefhee Fax:952.227.1310 egg . Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3ro Addition shall comply with the R-12, High Density Senior Center District Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax:952,227.1110 b. Permitted Uses Website e nnitt a .thin the t.bef a t t to be limited www.b.chanhassen.mn.us uses a zone to eeffffne the The I-prepr: a—e eial and seFviee uses consistent with neighbofheed. uses shall be lintited to these defia6d herein. The be as t5Te of uses to pmvided en this outlet shall be to intensityhb h a a oriented retail seRieeestablishments to meet daily Stieh inelude dium needs of residefAsiises may sfaall to sized Chanhassen is a Community for Life - - - -: - Mr. Michael Hoagberg February 27, 2015 Page 2 The permitted uses within the development shall the following: • Single Family Residential • Medium Density Residential • High Density Residential C. Setbacks In the PUD standards, the building setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public right-of- way. The 6ommereial High Density parking setback shall be 35 feet from any public right-of- way and/or interior property line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the $.Densii t' portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: Residential FrIM Residential Commercial Street Density Parking Parking Building Setback* Building Setback Setback* Setback Highway 101 * 50 ft. 20 ft. Highway 212 1 50 ft. 20 ft. West 86'h Street 1 1 30 ft. 20 ft. Interior Lot Lines 0 ft. (from commercial) 0 ft. 0 ft. 0 ft. (from commercial) 50 ft. from residential) 35 ft. from residential * Setbacks shall be established pursuant to section 20-505 of Chanhassen City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box Minimum Lot Size multi -family units: Mission Hills: As approved on October 24, 1994 in the Plat of Mission Hills; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 91h Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 1CP Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 1 Id Supplemental filed May 7, 1996; and Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 12a' Supplemental filed May 20, 1996; Mission Hills 2nd Addition: Area: 2,100 square feet Width: 46 feet Depth: 47 feet Mission Hills 31d Addition: Area: 376,358.4 square feet Width: 480 feet G PLAN 2015 Plannine Case,-ijI5-01 Mission HiIL- Senior LivmgApproval letter Prelim Plat PUD end Site Plan.doc Mr. Michael Hoagberg February 27, 2015 Page 3 Depth: 620 feet BLOCK USE Net Lot Area Density Hard Surface Coverage �Batlet dal '?, 2 aeFas fission Hills 31d Addition 152 Multi -Family Units $.64 acres Block 1, Mission Hills 138 Multi -Family Units 18 acres 7.66 37% Block 4, Mission Hills 56 Multi -Family Units 8.92 acres 6.28 43.2% RESIDENTIAL Building exterior material shall be a combination of pre -painted 5-inch aluminum siding and brick. 2. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one-story units and horizontal transom windows over the 2 story windows. Introduce some variation among the buildings through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc. 4. Each unit shall have a minimum of one over -story tree within its front yard. G:\PLAN\2015 Planning Cases12015-01 Mission Hills Senior IivingUppmval letter Prelim Plat PUD and Site Plan.dm Mr. Michael Hoagberg February 27,2015 Page 4 5. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not West 86th Street. 6. The apartment building located on Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition shall: a. Have a pronounced entrance. b. Ensure that all foundation walls are screened by landscaping or retaining walls. c. Have materials which include masonry, painted siding, and exterior Finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. e. Site Landscaping and Screening The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using over -story deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of over -story evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. Berms of 2 to 3 feet high shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right-of-way. These berms shall be seeded and/or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/or sodded. Two trees with a minimum of a N inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one over -story evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. 1. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public rights -of -way. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. 4. The Outlot shall be seeded and maintained in a weed -free condition in all areas proposed for future development. f. Signage One monument sign along Great Plains Boulevard shall be pitted for Lot 1, Block 1, ssion Hills 31 Addition. en e€ the$Ul3 GAPLAN12015 PI Cases12015-01 Mission Hills Senior Iiving\Approval letter Prelim Plat PUD and Site Plan.doc Mr. Michael Hoagberg February 27, 2015 Page 5 1. All businesses built within ti ' ' " ' one ffleEmment sign. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than two street frontages. The total of each wall - mounted sign display area shall not exceed 24 square feet. 3. All signs require a separate permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. No illuminated signs within A { dt-A,,r ouliWW,3'dAdd tion maybe viewed from the residential section of the PUD. 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed three feet in height. 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. RESIDENTIAL One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development. The sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. g. Lighting 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded high-pressure sodium or LED fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum height of a residential street light shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within J, nT* 3'l Addid shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether director reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. `7. 'f'vi. 4�'-i� �;i ...�+ os�agc .0_ 2. SUBDIVISION GAPLAN\2015 Planning Cases\201"l Mission Hills Senior Iaving\Appmv l letter Prelim Plat PUD smd Site Plan.doc Mr. Michael Hoagberg February 27, 2015 Page 6 The City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition, as shown in plans dated received December 22, 2014, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Park and Trail Conditions 1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling and $5,000 per twin home dwelling, the total park fees will be $599,200. Engineering Conditions: The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $108,921.60. These shall be due with the final plat. 2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance manual that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the City and record that agreement against the property." 3. SITE PLAN APPROVAL "The City Council approves the site plan consisting of a 134-unit senior housing apartment and nine twin homes, Planning Case 2015-01 as shown in plans dated received January 29, 2015, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Environmental Resource Conditions: The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for approval. The revised plan shall incorporate increased plantings of evergreens and ornamentals along Highway 101 to provide additional screening for the twin homes at the north end of the project site in order to meet minimum bufferyard requirements. Building Official Conditions: 1. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota A "Code Record" is required (Code Record schematic plans may be same scale as architectural). For "Code Record" information go to MN Department of Labor and Industry website: http://www.dli.mn.goy/CCLD/PlanConstruction.M. 2. Buildings must be protected with automatic fire suppression systems. 3. An accessible route must be provided to buildings, parking facilities, public transportation stops and all common use facilities. G:\PLAN\2015 Planning Ca \2015-01 Mission HiOs Senior living\Approval letta Prelim Plat PUD and Site Plan.dm Mr. Michael Hoagberg February 27, 2015 Page 7 4. Parking areas, including parking garages, must be provided with accessible parking spaces dispersed among the various building entrances. 5. Accessible dwelling units must be provided in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. 6. The building owner and/or their representatives should meet with the Inspections Division to discuss plan review and permit procedures (in particular, type of construction and allowable area issues must be addressed). Fire Marshal Conditions: I. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow painted curbing will be required. Contact Fire Marshal for specifics. 3. Street names are required for the main road entering the project and the loop road serving the twin homes. Street signs shall be installed prior to building construction. Proposed street names must be submitted to Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for review and approval. 4. Fire hydrants shall be installed and made serviceable prior to combustible construction. 5. Prior to combustible construction fire apparatus access roads capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus shall be made serviceable. 6. In lieu of a fire lane to the back side of the building, additional fire protection features shall be provided, including but not limited to Class 1 standpipes installed per Fire Department requirements. 7. Provide to Chanhassen Fire Marshal radius turn dimensions for accessing the building. The concern is the center islands for getting fire apparatus to the front doors. Engineering Conditions: 1. The grading plan must show a spot elevation between the two buildings near Infiltration Basin No. 5, to show that water will flow away from both structures. 2. Proposed grades at the northwest comer of the western parking lot must be revised so as not to exceed a 3:1 slope. 3. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: smooth face, poured - in -place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber. 4. Walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 5. Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. GAPLAN\2015 Planning Cases\2015-01 Mission Hills Senior Uving\.A p val letter Prelim Plat PUD and Site Plan.dw Mr. Michael Hoagberg • February 27, 2015 Page 8 6. If a wall is taller than six feet, a fence or other barrier would be required to provide separation from any drive or walkway within 10 feet. 7. The top and bottom wall elevation must be labeled on the southwestern retaining wall. 8. The plans must show names for these streets. 9. The developer's engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7-ton design. 10. The plan set shall include turn movements for a fire truck to navigate the medians for entry access to the main building. 11. The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their plan set. 12. The parking lot aisles must be a minimum of 26 feet wide. 13. Pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements. 14. All water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and must meet the city's requirements for public utilities. 15. This parcel has paid the city for one water and sanitary service hook-up. All additional units must pay a water and sanitary service partial hookup fee at the time of final plat. 16. The developer shall work with the Building Department to determine the City SAC and WAC fees for the main building. 17. All work within the MnDOT right-of-way must be approved by MnDOT. 18. A full S WPPP meeting all the requirements of the NPDES permit must be provided to the city for review and approval prior to recording the final plat. 19. The applicant shall evaluate the practicality of implementing, to the "maximum extent practicable," volume -reducing practices including re -use. 20. All swales directing surface flows towards surface water features, including but not limited to storm sewer infrastructure, and off the subject property shall be stabilized within 48 hours of cessation of grading activities. 21. Erosion control blanket shall include the swales in their entirety. 22. The design of the stormwater BMPs shall follow the guidelines of the MN Stormwater Manual unless the City Engineer agrees to a deviation for those guidelines. 23. Pretreatment shall be provided for all filtration basins accepting water from driving and parking surfaces. G:tP1.AN12015 PI>®ing Ca \2015-01 Mission Hills Swim livmgWpproval letter Prelim Plat PUD and Site Plan.dm Mr. Michael Hoagberg• February 27, 2015 Page 9 24. A planting plan for the filtration features will be required before recording the final plat. 25. Topsoil shall meet, at a minimum, MnDOT specification 3877-2 "Loam Topsoil Borrow." 26. It is the applicant's responsibility to assure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project. Planning Conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with staff to improve the screening of the southwesterly portion of the site through the use of berming and landscaping. 2. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 3. The site is permitted one monument sign facing Great Plains Boulevard. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance." A site plan agreement must be prepared by the city; however, cost estimates for the project must be submitted prior to document preparation. Final plat documents must be submitted to the City four weeks prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 952.227.1134 or e-mail at saliaffna,ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, 1 Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner Enclosure ec: Stephanie Smith, Project Engineer Klingelhutz Farms, LLC 545 Lake Drive #205 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Eric Reiners, Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. GAPLAM2015 Plam ing Cases\2015-01 Minim Hills Senior livmg\Appwval letter Prelim Plat PUD and Site Plan.dm ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to City Council meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: Submit three (3) sets of full size, 50 scale construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevations, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. • The plans shall include traffic signage and street light placement. 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality ponding with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements (if applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Improvements: a. Sanitary sewer system. b. Water system. c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. Streets, sidewalk and trails. Erosion control. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). Site grading Street lights & signs Engineering, surveying & inspection Landscaping Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (8'Y2" x 11"), and a digital copy in .tif format. 8. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a .doc format. 9. Lot tabulations. Failure to provide any of the above items by the required deadline will result in delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Updated 11-29-M c:\users\karene\appdataVocal\microsoft\windows\temporary intemet files\oontent.outlook\7,4a9tov\final plat submittal.doc • CITY OF CAANAhSSEII 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Fax:952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone:952.2271180 Fax:952.227.1190 Engineering Phone:952.227.1160 Fax:952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax:952.227,1110 Park & Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 Fax:952,227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone.952.227.1130 Fax:952.2271110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax:952.227.1110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner FROM: Todd Hoffinan, Park & Recreation Director All DATE: February 27, 2015 SUBJ: Outlot E Mission Hills Senior Living: Recommendation Concerning Park & Trail Conditions of Approval PARKS This property is located within the''/2-mile neighborhood park service area for Chanhassen Hills Park. Residents of the Mission Hills Senior Living community will have convenient access to this publicly -maintained recreation facility. Chanhassen Hills Park is 8 acres in size and features a playground, basketball court, picnic shelter, ballfield, benches and walking trails. Off-street parking is also available on Chanhassen Hills Drive South. Bandimere Community Park and Lake Susan Community Park are both located within the I -mile community park service of the new Mission Hills Senior Living housing. These two parks are more robust in their recreation facility offering, including features such as a fishing pier, boat landing, tennis courts, archery range, soccer fields and extensive walking trails. No additional parkland acquisition is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. TRAILS The subject site has convenient access to the public trails along Great Plains Boulevard, the three-mile Rice Marsh Lake Trail Loop, and the lakeside trail route to Lake Susan Park. No additional trail construction is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. PARK AND TRAIL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Outlot E, Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling, $5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $374,800. Unit Type No. of Units Amount Total Independent Apartments 66 $3,800/unit $250,800 Assisted Living Apartments 54 $500/bed $27,000 Memory Care Apartments 14 $500/bed $7,000 Rental Twin Homes 9 $5,000/side $90,000 Total I 1 1 $374,800 g: plan 2015 planning cases\2015-01 mission hills senior livinglpark and trail requirements.docx SCANNEQ Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow • Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 Chief Don Johnson: Thank you very much. Thank you. We try to send those out, I review reports on a weekly basis and we'll continue to send those out and I'll send whatever the comments are forward but the community is very supportive of us and as you can see that's kind of our report card to you as well so thank you. Appreciate it. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Any other comment or question? Thank you Chief. Chief Don Johnson: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: See you next month. MISSION HILLS SENIOR LIVING: REOUEST FOR PUD AMENDMENT, SUBDIVISION AND SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES FOR A 134-UNIT SENIOR HOUSING STRUCTURE AND 9 TWIN HOMES (18 INDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS) ON 8.64 ACRES ZONED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 8600 GREAT PLAINS BOULEVARD, OUTLET E, MISSION HILLS). APPLICANT: HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT. Kate Aanenson: Thank you Mayor, members of the City Council. The Senior Hills Living is Headwaters Development. It appeared before the Planning Commission back in January. It took, they had to make some pretty substantial revisions to the plan regarding the location of the building. Just sliding it back so the engineering had to be changed so there was a gap between when it went to the Planning Commission and now before you so we've edited the staff report and happy to say that they've really modified all the conditions that were in the staff report and it's a pretty clean project so we're happy about that. So for your review tonight there's actually 3 actions. One is the PUD amendment. Number two is looking at the site plan and then a subdivision of a preliminary plat. Mayor Laufenburger: And are these 3 independent actions or would we be... Kate Aanenson: No, they're included all in one motion. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much. Kate Aanenson: Yes. So the location of the subject site is off of Great Plains Boulevard or County Road 101 and just north of 212 is the location of the site. So first I'm going to talk a little bit about the history with the land use plan. So this subject site, again the interchange of 212 and 101 was given mixed use development so there was actually on this site the category allowed for the mixed use development. There's only two locations in the city that allowed for this type of land use and that would either accommodate either commercial or high density residential. So when the Mission Hills came in, they held that piece of property out for commercial and that's how that PUD was established. So again that commercial was put in 5 SCANNED Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 11 place prior to the development at the other comer. It would be the southwest comer of 101 and 212 where we've got the Kwik Trip and some of the other commercial development there. So with that the PUD again was established. The land use designation for the mixed use we looked at in 2008. We did a study as we were in a lot of flux in that area with the park and ride coming in. There were some concerns from the neighborhood how this area was all being viewed. What was happening. Also the comer, the southwest corner of 101 and Lyman Boulevard as some of those properties in the area. There was a lot of change going on with the new interchange right there so we actually worked with, hired SRF to go through and look at some of the, some templates of some land use recommendations to say what were some options. So this is one piece of property. The subject site that we actually looked at and had recommended now that we knew that the commercial would probably go at the Kwik Trip site. That would probably be more served for what we suggested was residential and had recommended that senior housing would be more acceptable there. There was an access to this property that was given to continue the use. Everybody kind of knows it as the pumpkin patch property so that was giving them kind of the access to the farm property. Otherwise the access was limited off of West 86m. While it was given commercial designation staff really didn't have any interest in that. I know there was someone looking at it for high, more intense office but because of the trip generation located on 86' and the turning movements, it'd really be problematic. There's a lot of trips coming in in that intersection. Coming out it's, it's a restricted turn movement. It's very narrow so we didn't see a lot of interest in that so we were pleased to see a senior housing project move forward in that because we felt all along that that was the right designation for the subject property. So with that the, whoops. With that the amendment then would take place on this. Again the underlying land use allows for either commercial or residential but to reconcile that then your first action would then would be to recommend this amendment going back to the commercial land use. So I'll explain how that works on the next couple of slides here. So what we looked at for what would the density would allow. 16 units an acre. There was some excess density in some of the existing Mission Hills development so there's the low density that comes off of Mission Hills Lane. The subject site right here. And then you've got some medium density on both of these properties so they were all developed a little bit differently. Again there's one way out, right out on this property here and so that the main access would be off of the commercial. Or excuse me, the West 80s Street. So there was excess density. This next chart kind of shows you how we came to what the total number of units could be on the site so what also drives a development of this site, while you can, it may allow for, the density may allow for more units. It's really driven by can you meet the other standards. It's in the shoreland district. You have a 50 percent open space. There's a height requirement within the shoreland district so there's other factors. Parking. Managing stormwater. All these factors then allows for, or drives how the development's going to look. So the applicant then, while it may allow for higher than that, how it got developed on the site, meeting all the criteria of the district shaped how that would be so the 134 plus the townhouse units is what's recommended on the site. The existing conditions on the property, again it's currently being farmed. There's some change in grade as you get to 212. One of the other issues that we thought were good about this project is it provides for noise attenuation as you look, coming off that off ramp onto the 101. Some of the people in Mission Hills commented on some of the noise that's coming off of 212 right now so provides attenuation with the taller building for that noise buffer. So again with the total number of units they came in with their project and the other factor driving this was the shoreland district. Within 1,000 feet of the shoreland district you can't be higher than the 35 feet so that also affected that. So Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 this drawing is what's changed, what you're seeing tonight is changed from the Planning Commission to meet those requirements of the shoreland district and the 50 percent open space. So you can only be 35 feet as I mentioned within that so they had to tip the building a little bit to make that work so this is the redesign making it work. You can see the shoreland district line so it meets the 50 percent open space and then 35 feet outside of the shoreland district. So the building itself as I mentioned, 134 apartments. Within those 134 apartments is independent living and assisted, memory care. Some what we would call service enriched type units and then the 9 rental twin homes in here so it really does make a nice transition between the existing medium density on the north side and then we worked really hard with the developer to get this building and the orientation of that building so that the mass of the building wasn't immediately to the backs of those townhouses. There's a slight grade change but I think they did a good job of matching that up to make it the least imposing. Access to the site as I mentioned is off of 86"' Street and you can see there's a control there regarding the turning movements and I'll let the City Engineer take a few minutes just to talk about some of the access issues and traffic. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Oehme. Paul Oehme: Sure, thank you Mayor and City Council members. So like Ms. Aanenson had indicated the only access to the development is off 86a' Street as shown here. Internal access would be, these roadways are all private. The staff had required that a traffic study be completed for this development. We looked at the number of units out here and looked at existing traffic and future, thank you. And future traffic based upon the design. Also we looked at the current single family development that's being constructed at this, along 80h Street as well so based upon all the inputs and the existing traffic that's currently generated through Mission Hills and 86`s Street, the traffic for this development we're anticipating to be around 500 trips per days. The peak period intersections, back up or the level of service for each of those intersections, we're not anticipating those service levels to change greatly at all at this intersection or at Mission Hills Drive or at the intersection of Lake Susan Drive and 101. This development is again senior citizen living so the traffic generations are a little bit different than if we would have a market driven apartment complex or townhouse and developed at market rate in this area too so. With that we feel comfortable that the traffic generated for this site can easily be supported by the infrastructure and existing infrastructure that's already there today. There are some modifications that we'd like to see along 86' Street. Namely that the median that currently is along the access at the intersection, at the entrance to 8601 Street be removed for a turning radius considerations as well and we also are looking, or have looked at no parking along 80° Street here. Along on the curve here. We had some comments from some property owners out there, poor sight distance issues and lack of sight distance around the curve when parked, cars are parked there so that has been also considered. In the traffic study there was comments about stop signs which are included in the final recommendations in the plans currently and then some additional one way traffic circulations shown here that are also included in the current design as well. So with that brief overview of the traffic staff feels that the existing infrastructure and the way it's designed can support, that the existing roadway system can support this development. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Oehme. Kate, you want to continue? Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 Kate Aanenson: Yeah, I was just going to add too that the access, the access that's currently used to get to the farm fields is being eliminated with this project. And also in addition the parking does meet the requirement based on the tenant mix so that also meets the city ordinance. So here's the architectural elevations of the building itself. I do have a material board in the, shown in here but we think it's highly articulated building. It looks nice. We think it will be again based on the massing and the orientation should fit well into the site. Here's the material boards. That was one comment that the, on the twin homes that the Planning Commission did comment on is that they seemed a little bit homogeneous. Looked pretty similar. Some of the architectural features were actually in the gables so they are rental townhomes so we think that they'll look nice. Again just complimentary to their building which is what the goal they were seeking. It does have a monument sign on the entrance to the site. The big, excuse me, an entrance sign over here but the main monument sign will be on 101 just to give you indications. Assuming a lot of people coming off of 212 coming to this site so that would give them the ability to see that and then the monument, the entrance sign, excuse me. Yeah, the smaller entrance sign here but the identification sign would be on 101. Parks, there is park locations within the area so what the park commission is recommending is park and trail fees. One of the things that we've looked at in there to being sure we're consistent with other types of developments so we're going to re-examine those fees for park and trails. There might be a minor correction and we would come back with that at final plat but we are revisiting that and that is actually condition on page 27. Park and trail fees. So we will re-examine that and come back to you with final plat and make sure that we've got the correct number there. Mayor Laufenburger: Kate is that new information? Kate Aanenson: Yes it is. Mayor Laufenburger: Is the developer aware of that? Kate Aanenson: Yes. He was just informed. Yeah he's been informed since today so. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you. Kate Aanenson: So the final action then, so you've got the PUD amending and then you've got the site plan approval and this is your third action. This is an outlot. In order to build on it you need to create the lot and the lot is where the extractions come in. The park and trail fees by the creation of the subdivision lot so this would be Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'd Addition so that would be creating the lot for this development to go on. So with that the staff is recommending approval of the 3 motions. Again for the 134 senior housing apartments and the 9 twinhomes. The preliminary plat and the site plan approval so with that I'd be happy to answer any questions you may have. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, thank you Ms. Aanenson. In just a moment I'll ask the applicant would like to address the council but are there any questions that the council has of staff at this time? Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor? 0 • Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 Mayor Laufenburger: Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Yes I have a question but it's probably directed towards Mr. Oehme. The new intersection down there, because there will be more traffic, is that going to qualify for a stop light warrants? Paul Oehme: Mr. McDonald, so you're referencing 101 and 86Th Street? Councilman McDonald: 101 and Mission Hills Boulevard, yes. Paul Oehme: Sure. So we did look at that intersection briefly. We did talk to Carver County as well who has jurisdiction on 101. Since it's a T intersection and there is about, there will be about 1,700 trips per day coming out of the intersection. However the back up or the level of service, the queuing of the intersection at that location would not warrant a signal at this time. There is turn lanes on 101 to provide access and stacking along 101 so based upon the trip generation that we were seeing and what we think is going to be the amount of traffic on 86'" Street, we looked at the accidents at the intersection as well which are not very high. You know we feel it's not going to warrant a signal at this time. Councilman McDonald: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Any other questions of staff at this time? Okay, alright. Is the applicant present and would he or she like to address the council? And we ask that you state your name and your address. Mike Hoagberg: Hi, I'm Mike Hoagberg, President of Headwaters Development and I'm from Lakeville, Minnesota and we're here tonight to present the proposed development plan and really appreciate the time. Mayor Laufenburger: Good. Mike Hoagberg: You know we have spent a lot of time and effort to really make sure that we understand the City of Chanhassen and understand what our development is going to provide for the city and we also understand that a development of this size is important to the city and it's residents and so we wanted to spend a lot of time talking to city members. Talking to neighbors and really try to get the feedback and input for this type of project and how they felt about what our proposal was and by spending that time we were able to really incorporate all of that feedback into our plan and make sure that we're abiding to all the requirements that were set forth by the City and all of that has been incorporated into the plan that we're reviewing tonight and we hope that you can appreciate the effort that we did put in to make sure that we tried to accommodate everyone to the best of our ability. I also wanted to introduce the rest of my development team that's here tonight with us. Our operating partner Ebenezer is here and as you may know they're the leading provider for senior housing management in the state of Minnesota We also have our architectural firm here, Sperides Reiners Architects and they've been involved in many senior housing projects in the state of Minnesota and have been a great partner with us 0 0 i Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 from the beginning of the Mission Hills project here that we're proposing. So again thank you for the opportunity to speak with you guys tonight and put forth our proposal and if you have any questions from our development team, please don't hesitate to address us. Anyone that's here. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, would you just remain there for a moment to see if anybody on the council. Mike Hoagberg: Yep. Mayor Laufenburger: Any questions or comments from the council to Mr. Hoagberg? Apparently you've done your homework Mr. Hoagberg. Mike Hoagberg: And you pronounce my name well. I like that. Mayor Laufenburger: It's written right in front of me here so. I just, I do want to make a comment. I think that what you're bringing to Chanhassen is vitally important to the future of Chanhassen. One of the things that, one of my roles as mayor is to participate in Carver County discussions related to what is the County doing to serve this building and booming population called the baby boomers so on behalf of the, all of the citizens that currently are in the range of your market and those of us that are going to be there soon. I'm actually in the range already. I think it's wonderful and I know that the, I know that Carver County looks upon this as one of the vital elements to serving the entire population of Carver County so on behalf of all of the citizens who fall in that range I thank you for coming to Chanhassen and choosing to build a very quality property right here in Chanhassen so thanks Mike. Mike Hoagberg: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Let's bring it back to the council. Does anybody have any questions for staff at this time? Councilwoman Ryan: Mayor I have one question. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: Ms. Aanenson, in looking through the information I believe I read somewhere that there was, that you had asked for them to agree to an increase in buffer yard plantings. They were deficient in some areas. Has that been agreed to? Kate Aanenson: Yes. The revisions, they'll accommodate those in some of these areas here. There is a berm there but we want to make sure that we've got that and along Trunk Highway 101 where you've got more noise so yep. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay, thank you. And then the last one goes back to the traffic patterns. I know Councilman McDonald asked, is there, I know the County has to handle this and that there isn't intended to be an increase of traffic but do they take in consideration who that traffic is? My concern is with the, you know the senior building pulling out onto a busy road, is there 10 Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 going to be, is there an option or a possibility for a safe zone by the median as opposed to crossing. If you're taking a left and turning you know south on that road. I get concerned with the people coming off of a highway turning right headed down 101, picking up speeds and then that turn lane. That people get caught. Paul Oehme: Sure. Yep, so Councilwoman Ryan. So we did look at you know again the signal was our first review and it's not going to meet warrants under current state statutes and requirements. There is a fairly wide median out here. I believe it's 12 feet wide in the middle of the intersection so there is a quasi safe zone out there for people to travel through the southbound lanes before they head, or cross the northbound lane before they head on the southbound lane so 101 was improved back in I think 2005 with the 212 project so it is up to CSAH standards for roadway width. Turning lanes. Sight distances and those type of things so I think 101 is up to current standards right now so you know I think our best bet is to monitor it and if there are issues in the future, you know we always work with Carver County to address those type of things and if it does warrant a signal we'll definitely look and encourage Carver County to make those improvements at that time. Councilwoman Ryan: Great thank you. And I would remiss if I didn't say to encourage the Rice Marsh Lake loop after being on the Park and Rec. That's a great location so I encourage them using that loop. Mayor Laufenburger: Well that raises, thank you Councilwoman Ryan. That raises a question. Is there easy, not easy but is there identifiable access from this property to Rice Marsh Lake trail and if so how would that be? Mr. Hoffman can you speak to that? Todd Hoffman: I sure can. Through a sidewalk connection. So heading out of this property and then immediately to the right or back to the east, there's a sidewalk that would lead to a cul-de- sac and a newly developed 16 Preserve at Rice Lake so there'll be a connection there. An easy connection to make access from this property. Mayor Laufenburger: So they would exit this property. Immediately turn to the east along 86a', is that right? Todd Hoffman: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: And then, okay. Good. Todd Hoffman: And make their way in and conduct that loop. It's a 3 mile loop. One of the nicest trail loops in the southwest metro area for sure. Todd Gerhardt: How would you get to the Lake Susan trail loop Todd? Todd Hoffman: You would take a left. Head north and you can get to Lake Susan so. Mayor Laufenburger: And that's a tunnel. It's protected. It goes underneath. 11 • Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 Todd Hoffinan: Underneath Highway 101, yep. Great trail connections here and then they have access to Lake Susan Park and Bandimere Park as well. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, great location. Any other questions of city staff? Kate I have one for you. You talked about excess density and I think what, to use a different word. That would be unused density, is that what it is? Kate Aanenson: Yes. Yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: So it's density that was allowed in other parts of Mission Hills but it was not used so are you moving or are you transferring that density? Kate Aanenson: Right, the PUD allows you to transfer some of that density but what I'm saying the product choice that you make and the parameters of how you can develop on that site, because you're in the shoreland district. The parking standards. The height requirements. All those determine how many units you can get on the site so you may not be able to maximize all of those units that would be on the site so. Mayor Laufenburger: Are they, they as Mr. Hoagberg and his organization, have they done as much in terms of maximization as they can? Kate Aanenson: They're pretty close. Based on what they want to do. Now they want to do the twinhomes out there to get the 50 percent because they have clustered something and maybe done something more, you know they can't go over 35 feet within that area because of the shoreland district so those are the things that drive it but we think this is a very well suited for the site. Making the transitions. Creating those buffers. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. And one last thing. You mentioned that the park fees, that there may be an adjustment. What needs to happen to determine whether or not there will be an adjustment? Kate Aanenson: We'll work with them to understand the types of uses within the building. It's mostly they got the apartments and then they've got some other service enriched we call which would be the memory care or the like so we'll get that and how it's licensed and get clarification from Ebenezer on those. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, so you work with Ebenezer on how they're going to actually deploy the building, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. And was the developer satisfied with that? Kate Aanenson: Yes. 12 • Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Mr. Oehme, on that traffic island, as you going to take that whole thing out? Paul Oehme: We're not proposing to take it all out. We're proposing to take out the part that's in the curved area so the center median at 101 basically to where it starts to make the turn for the left turn lane there. That's the portion that's being proposed to be eliminated. Mayor Laufenburger: You talked about turning radius. Are you thinking about service vehicles that would come into Mission Hills? Is that what you're thinking about? Paul Oehme: Correct, delivery trucks. Moving trucks, those type of things. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Okay. Okay, Kate could you bring the motion back up to the screen for just a second? If we provide approval to this tonight Kate, does this, will this need to come back to the council at all? Kate Aanenson: Yes for final plat. And the conditions that go with the final plat would be the extractions including the park and trail fees so you will see that for final plat. So you will see that again. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so we're essentially giving permission for the developer and the City to move forward as their plans develop and when would you expect that final plat to come to us? Kate Aanenson: Well preliminary plat is usually contingent upon getting all your engineering work done so that would be some of the street ones that we just talked about. Some of the civil for sewer and water, some of those sort of things. And then security for any public improvements. Landscaping, that sort of thing so that would come back for final plat. Typically final plat's on consent. You would look at the conditions but typically those are on final plat. On consent, excuse me. Mayor Laufenburger: And has the developer talked with you about when they expect to put shovel in the ground? Kate Aanenson: We were anticipating that would be this spring. You could clarify that with them. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Hoagberg would you like to speak to that? Mike Hoagberg: Yes. There are still several factors that go into when we can and are able to put a shovel in the ground and we anticipate sometime this summer is what we're planning. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, okay. And that's probably if things go well occupancy sometime in 2016 then, is that correct? Mike Hoagberg: If things go smoothly. 13 • Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 Mayor Laufenburger: If things go smoothly. Mike Hoagberg: Yeah we think this is a little bit of a larger development. It may take a little longer than we would typically to construct but that's about right. It will build out in 2016. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, good. Well I know there's a lot of people looking forward to this so thank you Mr. Hoagberg. Any council comment or motion? Councilwoman Tjomhom: I'll make a comment Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Tjomhom. Councilwoman Tjomhom: One thing I've always liked about the city of Chanhassen is that we strive to be a community for life and earlier today in our work session we were talking about all the young families that the average age you know is like 38, 39. They all have kids and there's kind of a gap sometimes between people who are empty nesters and where do they really fit in and so I think this is a really good step forward to giving them yet another option to stay here for life and so I'm glad you're here. It looks like a wonderful project and so I will be in full support of it. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Councilwoman Tjomhom. Anybody else comment or motion? Councilwoman Tjomhom: I'll make a motion too. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much councilwoman. Go ahead. Councilwoman Tjomhom: I'd love to make a motion. I'd like to propose a motion that the Chanhassen City Council approves a Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards, site plan approval for the construction of 134 unit multi -tenant senior housing apartment building and 9 twinhomes, and preliminary plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot, Block I, Mission Hills Yd Addition and the adoption of the Findings of Fact. Mayor Laufenburger: Well spoken. Is there a second? Councilman Campion: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Councilman Campion. We have a valid motion. Is there any discussion? Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the Chanhassen City Council approves the Planned Unit Development amendment in the attached ordinance for Mission Hills to allow High Density Use on the site and set standards for the structures as shown below with the following conditions, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact: 14 • Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 1. The site must comply with the DNR Shoreland Rules. 2. The site shall comply with the following standards: Mission Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD mixed density housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the mixed density housing development shall comply with the requirements of the R-8, Mixed Medium Density District. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below. Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'a Addition shall comply with the R-12, High Density District. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses within the development shall include the following: • Single Family Residential • Medium Density Residential • High Density Residential C. Setbacks In the PUD standards, the building setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public right-of- way. The High Density parking setback shall be 35 feet from any public right-of-way and/ or interior property line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the High Density portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: Residential Residential Commercial Street High Density Medium Density Parking Parking Building Setback* Building Setback Setback Setback* Highway 101 * 50' 20' Highway 212 * 50, 20' West 8611 Street * 30' 20' Interior Lot Lines O'(from commercial) 0' 0' 0' (from commercial) 50 (from residential) 35 from residential * Setbacks shall be established pursuant to section 20-505 of the Chanhassen City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box 15 Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 Minimum Lot Size multi -family units: Mission Hills: As approved on October 24, 1994 in the Plat of Mission Hills; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 9th Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 10`" Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 1 in' Supplemental filed May 7, 1996; and Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 12a' Supplemental filed May 20, 1996; Mission Hills 21 Addition: Mission Hills 31 Addition: Area: 2,100 square feet Width: 46 feet Depth: 47 feet Area: 376,358.4 square feet Width: 480 feet Depth: 620 feet BLOCK USE Net Lot Density Hard Surface Area Coverage Mission Hills 3rd 152 Multi -Family Addition Units 8.64 acres 17.5 50% Block 1, Mission Hills 138 Multi -Family 18 acres 7.66 37% its Block 4, Mission Hills 1 56 Multi -Family Units 1 8.92 acres 6.28 43.2% RESIDENTIAL Building exterior material shall be a combination of prepainted 5-inch aluminum siding and brick. 2. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one-story units and horizontal transom windows over the 2 story windows. Introduce some variation among the buildings through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc.). 4. Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front yard. 5. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not 86th Street. 6. The apartment building located on Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 31 Addition shall: a. Have pronounced entrance. b. Insure that all foundation walls are screened by landscaping or retaining walls. iCel Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 c. Have materials which include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. e. Site Landscaping and Screening The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. Berms of 2 to 3 feet high shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right-of-way. These berms shall be seeded and/or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/or sodded. Two trees with a minimum of a 2'h inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one overstory evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. 1. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. 4. The Outlot shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. f. Signage One monument sign along Great Plains Boulevard shall be permitted for Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'a Addition. 1. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than two street frontages. The total of each wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed 24 square feet. 3. All signs require a separate permit. 17 P Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. No illuminated signs within Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'd Addition may be viewed from the residential section of the PUD. 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed three feet in height. 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. RESIDENTIAL One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development. The sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. g. Lighting All light fixtures shall be shielded high-pressure sodium or LED fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum height of a residential street light shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills Yd Addition shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition, as shown in plans dated received December 22, 2014, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: 18 Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 Park and Trail Conditions 1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3nd Addition. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling and $5,000 per twin home dwelling the total park fees will be $599,200. Engineering Conditions: The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $108,921.60. These shall be due with the final plat. 2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance manual that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity. 3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the City and record that agreement against the property. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approves the site plan consisting of a 134-unit senior housing apartment and nine twin homes, Planning Case 2015-01 as shown in plans dated received January 29, 2015, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Environmental Resource Conditions: The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for approval. The revised plan shall incorporate increased plantings of evergreens and ornamentals along Highway 101 to provide additional screening for the twin homes at the north end of the project site in order to met minimum bufferyard requirements. Building Official Conditions: 1. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. A "Code Record" is required (Code Record schematic plans may be same scale as architectural). For "Code Record" information go to MN Department of Labor and Industry website: httv://www.dli.mn.gov/CCLD/PlanConstruction.go. 2. Buildings must be protected with automatic fire suppression systems. 3. An accessible route must be provided to buildings, parking facilities, public transportation stops and all common use facilities. 19 Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 4. Parking areas, including parking garages, must be provided with accessible parking spaces dispersed among the various building entrances. 5. Accessible dwelling units must be provided in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. 6. The building owner and/or their representatives should meet with the Inspections Division to discuss plan review and permit procedures (in particular, type of construction and allowable area issues must be addressed). Fire Marshal Conditions: 1. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow painted curbing will be required. Contact Fire Marshal for specifics. 3. Street names are required for the main road entering the project and the loop road serving the twin homes. Street signs shall be installed prior to building construction. Proposed street names must be submitted to Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for review and approval. 4. Fire hydrants shall be installed and made serviceable prior to combustible construction. 5. Prior to combustible construction fire apparatus access roads capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus shall be made serviceable. 6. In lieu of a fire lane to the back side of the building, additional fire protection features shall be provided, including but not limited to Class 1 standpipes installed per Fire Department requirements. 7. Provide to Chanhassen Fire Marshal radius turn dimensions for accessing the building. The concern is the center islands for getting fire apparatus to the front doors. Engineering Conditions: 1. The grading plan must show a spot elevation between the two buildings near Infiltration Basin No. 5, to show that water will flow away from both structures. 2. Proposed grades at the northwest comer of the western parking lot must be revised so as not to exceed a 3:1 slope. 3. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: smooth face, poured - in -place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber. 4. Walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. OR • 0 Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 5. Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 6. If a wall is taller than six feet, a fence or other barrier would be required to provide separation from any drive or walkway within 10 feet. 7. The top and bottom wall elevation must be labeled on the southwestern retaining wall. 8. The plans must show names for these streets. 9. The developer's engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7-ton design. 10. The plan set shall include turn movements for a fire truck to navigate the medians for entry access to the main building. 11. The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their plan set. 12. The parking lot aisles must be a minimum of 26 feet wide. 13. Pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements. 14. All water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and must meet the city's requirements for public utilities. 15. This parcel has paid the city for one water and sanitary service hook-up. All additional units must pay a water and sanitary service partial hookup fee at the time of final plat. 16. The developer shall work with the Building Department to determine the City SAC and WAC fees for the main building. 17. All work within the MnDOT right of way must be approved by MnDOT. 18. A full SWPPP meeting all the requirements of the NPDES permit must be provided to the city for review and approval prior to recording the final plat. 19. The applicant shall evaluate the practicality of implementing, to the "maximum extent practicable", volume -reducing practices including re -use. 20. All swales directing surface flows towards surface water features, including but not limited to storm sewer infrastructure, and off the subject property shall be stabilized within 48 hours of cessation of grading activities. 21. Erosion control blanket shall include the swales in their entirety. 22. The design of the stormwater BMPs shall follow the guidelines of the MN Stormwater Manual unless the City Engineer agrees to a deviation for those guidelines. 21 u Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 23. Pretreatment shall be provided for all filtration basins accepting water from driving and parking surfaces. 24. A planting plan for the filtration features will be required before recording the final plat. 25. It is the applicant's responsibility to assure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project. 26. Topsoil shall meet, at a minimum, MnDOT specification 3877-2 "Loam Topsoil Borrow". 27. It is the applicant's responsibility to assure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project. Planning Conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with staff to improve the screening of the southwesterly portion of the site through the use of berming and landscaping. 2. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. The site is permitted one monument sign facing Great Plains Boulevard. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you staff and development and Ebenezer. We're looking forward to having you being a vital element of this community. Thank you very much. 610 WEST 96' STREET: REOUEST FOR VARIANCE FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN EXCESS OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET ON APPROXIMATELY 4.5 ACRES ZONED AGRICULTURAL ESTATE (A2); APPLICANT/OWNER: ROBERT AND CHRISTIN BOECKER. Kate Aanenson: Thank you Mayor, members of the City Council. This item is a request for a variance that appeared before the Planning Commission back in November. The applicant asked to be extended to this date, February 23'd and the reason it's before you today is that it didn't have the super majority for the Planning Commission. Therefore it was appealed by the applicant. It was denied. Excuse me, it was denied by the Planning Commission but the applicant has the right to appeal any decision. The location is 610 West 96'b Street. The subject site again off of, gets access off of West 96' Street and 101. This is Pioneer Trail. So this is the subject site here. So the property is requesting a variance to construct 38.5 foot by 48 foot horse shelter expansion which is approximately 1,848 square feet on the existing pole barn and 11 foot by 24 foot day shelter. So the existing, the city code that applies to this would be structures. That was adopted in 2007 that says you can't exceed 1,000 square feet and then also the agricultural district, the A2 district has four accessory structures that he already has a combined square footage of 12,706 and with the expansion there'd be 14,818 square feet. So the history of this property was in 1986 a permit was given for the 24 by 20 garage. That's number 1. In 2000 22 • ' ._-, CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: PCD*: 1/6/2015 �� I CC DATE: 2/23/2015 REVIEW DEADLINE: 2/3/2015 CASE #: 2015-01 BY: Al-Jaff, et al. "The Chanhassen City Council approves a Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards (Mission Hills PUD), Site Plan Approval for the construction of a 134-unit multi -tenant senior housing apartment building and nine twin homes, and Preliminary Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3A Addition, on property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and located at 8600 Great Plains Boulevard (Outlot E, Mission Hills); and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact." -Since the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant submitted revised plans to address issues raised in the staff report. This report has been edited in its entirety - SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Planned Unit Development O amendment, replat of 8.64 acres into one lot, and site plan review for the construction of a four- story senior housing apartment and nine twin homes. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within the required 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. LOCATION: 8600 Great Plains Boulevard (Outlot E, Mission Hills) North of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard and southwest of 86'h Street APPLICANT: Michael Hoagberg Klingelhutz Farms, LLC 17550 Hemlock Avenue 545 Lake Drive #205 Lakeville, MN 55044 Chanhassen, MN 55317 P: 952.378.4386 Neil Klingelhutz C: 612.723.3330 C: 612-685-5580 E: mhoagbergAch-holdin¢sllc.com klin¢elhutz3Amsn.com PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development Mixed Use — PUD, Mixed Use 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Mixed Use ACREAGE: 8.64 Acres (376,358 square feet) DENSITY: 17.5 Units per Acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy -making capacity. A PUD amendment must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning SCANNED Mission Hills Senior Living• Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 2 of 30 Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The request consists of multiple applications to facilitate the construction of a four-story senior housing apartment building and nine twin homes. The requests include a Planned Unit Development Amendment to existing standards, a site plan for an apartment building and twin homes and a subdivision to replat an outlot into a lot. The site is located North of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard and southwest of 86'" Street. The site is zoned Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use. Sewer and water are available to the site. Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86th Street. Mission Hills Senior Living• Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 3 of 30 The following is a summary of the requests: 1. Planned Unit Development Amendment: The first request is to amend the ordinance regulating the use on the site from Commercial to Residential. 2. Subdivision/Preliminary and Final Plat: The second request is for subdivision approval to replat 8.64 acres into a lot. 3. Site Plan: The final request is for a site plan to construct a four-story, 134-unit senior housing apartment building and nine twin homes. Site coverage is averaged over the entire development. This is permitted under the PUD ordinance (Section 20-505 (e)). The total permitted site coverage is 50 percent. The proposed development has a total hard coverage area of 46.5%. The design of the building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high -quality materials. They include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. The twin homes will reflect some of the architectural elements of the apartment building yet maintain their individuality. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. Parking is buffered from views by buildings and landscaping. Sidewalks and trails allow for connections between the subject site and the surrounding buildings and separates pedestrian from vehicular traffic. Access to the site is provided via West 86' Street. There will not be direct access to Highways 212 or 101 (Great Plains Boulevard). Staff regards the project as a well -designed development. The overall design is sensitive to the surrounding area. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan, subdivision and planned unit development amendment with conditions as outlined in the staff report. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article VII, Planned Unit Development District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 9. — Design Standards for Multifamily Developments Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 4 of 30 BACKGROUND The Land Use Plan designates areas around the Highways 101/212 interchange as mixed use. This category has been established to accommodate either commercial or high - density residential developments. The high - density category, which includes units with a maximum net density of 16.0 units per acre, accommodates apartments and higher density condominium units, but would also permit the development of townhome-type units. The Mission Hills development was approved prior to the realignment of CSAH 101 (Great Plains Boulevard) and the construction of Highway 212. The subject site was platted as an outlot to accommodate this road work, which has since been completed allowing the site to be developed. On October 24, 1994, the City Council approved the following: • Rezoning the site from RSF to PUD (#93-4). The uses within the PUD allowed for Low Density Residential at the northeasterly portion, Medium Density along the center of the site and Neighborhood Commercial along the southwesterly portion; • Final plat of Mission Hills for 16 single-family lots and 75 medium -density lots to accommodate a total of 210 units and an outlot for future commercial development; and • Site Plan #94-5 for the construction of 194 townhouses. Mission Hills Senior Living • Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 5 of 30 The site permitted a total of 212 units within the medium density section of the site. The total number of units built was 194 units (18 units remaining). The low density residential section of the site allowed 34 units. The total homes built were 16 (18 units remaining). The Planned Unit Development Ordinance allows the transfer of density within the boundaries of a PUD. These remaining unused units are proposed to be transferred to the proposed senior housing site to accommodate the proposed 134-unit apartment building and nine twin homes. Total Acres Density # of Units Permitted # of Units Built Low Density 8.5 4 units per acre 34 16 Medium Density 26.5 8 units per acre 212 194 Total 246 210 SITE PLAN In order to provide a better understanding of the overall development, staff will first review the site plan component, which in turn leads to the PUD amendment. The building must comply with the Development Design Standards for Mission Hills. A PUD is required to be developed to a higher quality than other projects. Site coverage is averaged over the entire development. This is permitted under the PUD ordinance (Section 20-505 (e)). The total permitted site coverage is 50 percent. The proposed development has a total hard coverage area 46.5%. The site plan request is for the construction of a four-story senior housing apartment building and nine twin homes. In order to accommodate those residential units, the planned unit development standards pertaining to uses on the subject site will need to be amended. Sidewalks and trails allow for connections between the subject site and the surrounding buildings and separates pedestrian from vehicular traffic. Access to the site is provided via 86`" Street. There will not be direct access to Highway 212 nor Great Plains Boulevard. Mission Hills Senior Living• Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 6 of 30 Parking is proposed along the middle of the site and below the apartment building. It is buffered from views by the buildings and landscaping. The minimum setback in the PUD district is 50 feet from the residential district. The apartment building maintains a minimum of 65 feet at the closest point to the westerly property line and increases to 120 feet. There is a 20-foot parking and drive aisle setback from all exterior property lines. The proposed development complies with the required setbacks. The trash enclosure will be located within the underground parking area serving the apartment building. The design of the building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high -quality materials which include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. The building has pronounced entrances, utilizes durable exterior materials, and exhibits articulation. .E ,�..=. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 7 of 30 The nine twin homes will be located along the northeasterly portion of the site. The design and colors used on the buildings will complement the apartment building and remain within the same color family, however; each unit will have some unique features. Utilizing the basic building footprint, the applicant modified the exterior components and colors to create four unique yet compatible design options for the twin homes. The location of each design type is placed within the layout of nine buildings to create a maximum separation between each design option. Design Option #2 Features color scheme #2 with a gable roof design over the front bay window, square four - post column at front walk and garage door with transom windows. Design Option #1 Features color scheme #1 with a shed roof design over the front bay window, tapered siding column at front walk and standard garage door. Design Option #3 Features color scheme #1 with a gable roof design over the front bay window, square four - post column at front walk and standard garage door. L Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 8 of 30 Design Option #4 Features color scheme #2 with a shed roof design over the front bay window, tapered siding column at front walk and garage door with transom windows. The total number of units proposed on the site is 134 units housed in the apartment building and 18 units in nine twin homes. When the Mission Hills development was created, the development was allowed a density of: Area # of Units Permitted # of Units Built Total Remaining Medium Density 26.5 212 194 18 High Density subject Site 8.64 138 0 138 Total 35.14 350 194 156 The total number of units proposed is 152. The PUD ordinance permits the transfer of density within the boundaries of a development. Staff is recommending approval of the transfer of the remaining medium density to the high density site to accommodate the proposed development. Staff regards the project as a well -designed development. The overall design is sensitive to the surrounding area. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan with conditions as outlined in the staff report. LIGHTING/SIGNAGE The applicant has submitted a lighting plan and a photometrics plan has been prepared for the site. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. All fixtures must be shielded. The development is permitted one monument sign. The total sign area may not exceed 24 square feet and 5 feet in height. A sign is proposed along the west facing Great Plains Boulevard. This sign is in a "V" shape. Y pIUYEN, MCMRECIVML FLEYFNT6 ` YOYIILIFMI MOYIE[,11NY ELE V [r, Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 9 of 30 The city code allows double-faced signs if the angle between the two faces does not exceed 45 degrees. The plans reflect a 30-degree separation. City code limits the number of monument signs to one per lot. The total area of the monument signs is 24 square feet and the height is 5 feet which is in keeping with the district regulations. PARKING The ordinance requires one parking space per twin home unit for a total of 18 spaces. The applicant is providing 18 spaces. The ordinance requires one parking space per independent living apartment unit. Sixty-six spaces are required and provided. The ordinance requires one parking space per three assisted -living units. Twenty-three spaces are required and provided. The ordinance requires one parking space per employee. The applicant is providing 24 spaces. The ordinance also requires one space per four units. The total number required is 38. The applicant is providing 38 spaces. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE Size. Portion and Placement Entries: The building has pronounced entrances. Articulation: The buildings incorporate adequate detail and have been tastefully designed. The architectural style is unique to the buildings but will fit in with the surrounding area. The buildings will provide a variation in style through the use of masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. The building utilizes exterior materials that are durable and of high quality. Signs: All signage must meet the sign criteria in the Planned Unit Development Ordinance prescribed for this development. Material and Detail High quality materials are being used on the building. Color The colors chosen for the buildings are earth tones. The selection is unique, but blends in with the surrounding buildings. Height and Roof Desien The building ranges in height between 14 and 51 feet. The number of stories ranges between one and four stories. The setback of the building exceeds the height of the building which will allow for a balanced appearance and will not appear imposing. The roofline is staggered and contains dormers which adds articulation to the design of the buildings. All rooftop equipment must be screened from views. Mission Hills Senior Living• Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 10 of 30 Facade Transparency All facades viewed by the public contain more than 50 percent windows and/or doors. One area that can be viewed by the public does not meet ordinance requirement. This area is located along the southeast corner. This can be easily remedied through the use of additional landscaping. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the City shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. Mission Hills Senior Living • Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 11 of 30 (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the City's design requirements, the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and the site plan review requirements. The site contains a number of outdoor seating areas and walking paths that connect to city trails. The overall design provides adequate open space. The design incorporates the curb appeal criteria listed in the city code which includes: (1) Orientation to the street or access road: (a) Setbacks (b) Spacing between buildings and view sheds. (2) Architectural detail/decorative features. (a) Windows. (b) Flower boxes. (c) Porches, balconies, private spaces. (d) Location and treatment of entryway. (e) Surface materials, finish and texture. (f) Roof pitch. (g) Building height and orientation. (3) Location of garages. (4) Landscaping including fencing and berming. (5) Street lighting. (6) Screening of parking, especially in apartment and condominium developments. (7) Variations/differentiations in units including, but not limited to, color, material, articulation etc. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. The site design is compatible with the surrounding developments. It is functional and harmonious with the approved development for this area. Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. The overall design is sensitive to the City's image. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan with conditions outlined in the staff report. SITE CONSTRAINTS PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The applicant is proposing a 152-unit senior housing development on an 8.64 acre parcel of land. As part of the development, the applicant is requesting that the zoning be changed to PUD- Residential. The land is currently in agricultural production. Mission Hills Senior Livin• • Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 12 of 30 SITE CONSTRAINTS Wetland Protection The City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the National Wetland Inventory do not indicate the presence of any wetlands on the subject property. A review of historic aerial photographs and on -site observations supports the conclusion that there are no wetlands on the subject property Bluff Protection There are no bluffs on the property. Shoreland Management A significant portion of the subject property lies within the shoreland district for Lake Susan. The development will need to meet the PUD requirements for the DNR shoreland rules. This includes having a minimum of 50% preserved as green space; they are proposing just over 53%. In addition, they must meet the minimum standards for stormwater management and erosion prevention. They have provided a stormwater management plan and an erosion prevention and sediment control plan. By meeting the requirements of the City and the Watershed District the applicant will have satisfied the DNR standards. Floodplain Overlay This property does not lie within a floodplain. Bluff Creek Overlay This property does not lie within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. SITE GRADING: DRAINAGE Currently the site has three drainage areas. The majority of the site either drains north to West 86'h Street or south to the right of way for Highway 212. Approximately 16% of the site drains to the east to Mission Hills with much of this watershed making it to a storm water pond located at the intersection of Mission Hills Way and 860' Street West. Under the proposed condition the site is divided into seven drainage areas that will leave the site at four distinct locations. A majority of the site will be treated and discharged to the existing storm sewer either at the intersection of Great Plains Boulevard and 86's Street West or to the storm system in the southwest comer of the site that goes under Great Plains Boulevard and discharges onto 8601 Great Plains Boulevard. The applicant has revised the storm water management design so that discharge rates do not increase from existing rates at any discharge point form the site under all required storm designs. The proposed plan provides for on -site treatment for all but approximately one acre of the site. This acre is comprised almost entirely of open space with about 3,700 square feet of roof and will be directed towards one of two off -site treatment areas. Any discharge to MN/DOT or work within their right-of-way will require their approval. Mission Hills Senior Living• Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 13 of 30 The grading plan must show a spot elevation between the two buildings near Infiltration Basin No. 5, to show that water will flow away from both structures. Proposed grades at the northwest comer of the western parking lot must be revised so as not to exceed a 3:1 slope. SITE GRADING: EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL An erosion control plan consistent with Section 19-145 of city code will be required. This development exceeds the threshold for the NPDES Construction Permit. A Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required for review and approval. Many of the elements required in the SWPPP have been included in the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan Sheet C100. The city has checklist of required SWPPP elements. This checklist will be made available to the applicant and the consulting engineer for use in their preparation of the SWPPP. The SWPPP will be required with the final plat and prior to any earth -disturbing activities. The NPDES construction permit must be granted to the applicant prior to any earth -disturbing activities. RETAINING WALLS The developer is proposing two retaining walls along the south of the proposed, main building and one retaining wall near the north property line. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: smooth face, poured -in -place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber. Walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Minnesota. The southeastern wall is approximately 180 feet long, with a maximum height of 8 feet. It runs parallel to the walkway around the southeastern side of the main building. The southwestern wall is approximately 165 feet long, with a maximum height of 12 feet. It wraps around the walkway on the southwest side of the proposed main building. The plans shall label the top and bottom elevations of this wall. This wall must include a fence or other barrier to provide separation from the nearby walkway. The northern retaining wall is approximately 190 feet long with a maximum height of 5 feet. This wall wraps around the northern most twin home, running between the home and Infiltration Basin #5. TRAFFIC STUDY The developer commissioned a traffic study to determine what impacts the proposed development would create compared with not developing the land. The results of the study show that the intersections of CSAH 101 and Lake Susan Drive, CSAH 101 and West 86' Street, and Mission Hills Senior Living• Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 14 of 30 West 80h Street and Mission Hills Drive would have a negligible change in Level of Service and all the studied intersections would function at acceptable levels. The City has been contacted by the Mission Hills Gardens Homeowners Association. This HOA is located nearby on the north side of West 86'h Street. The two letters staff has received are included in this report. From these letters and a discussion with their Vice President, the HOA's main concern is with, not an increase in delay from traffic, but the safety of the left turn from West 86'h Street onto CSAH 101, intersection design as it exists today. CSAH 101 is a county mad, for that reason Carver County has jurisdiction over any changes to the intersection of CSAH 101 and West 86'h Street. City staff has contacted the County to notify them of the residents' concern in the area. From MnDOT crash data, there has not been a reported accident at the intersection of CSAH 101 & West 80h Street within the past five years, therefore, it may not be a high priority for a County safety improvement project. Staff also received notice that residents were concerned about the visibility around West 86'h Street curves when cars are parked on that street. The developer's traffic engineer indicated that the proposed development is not expected to generate additional parking on West 86'h Street due to three onsite parking lots. Staff has followed up on this issue outside of the development review process. STREETS The proposed plan consists of two private streets to provide access to the nine twin homes and the main building and parking lots. The plans must show names for these streets. The developer's engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7-ton design. The plan set shall include tum-movements for a fire truck to navigate the medians for entry access to the main building. The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their plan set: • Special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping and signing. • When designing internal traffic controls, incorporate improvements based on guidelines established in the MUTCD. In particular, it is important to identify traffic controls at intersections between internal roadways/driveways to minimize vehicular conflicts and driver confusion. • Review truck turning movements to ensure that large vehicles have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal roadways. • Modify the raised median at the W. 86'h Street/Mission Hills Drive intersection and strip W. 86`h Street to help delineate the travel/turn lanes. Mission Hills Senior Living• Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 15 of 30 PARKING & WALKWAYS The site plan includes two parking lots for the main building and a small parking lot for the twin homes. The parking lot aisle of the twin home lot must be a minimum of 26 feet wide or the stalls may be lengthened to 20 feet. The plans include sidewalks and trails throughout the property. The pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements. WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER MAIN — PRIVATE UTILITIES All water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and must meet the City's requirements for public utilities. The plans call for 8-inch Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP) water main and 8-inch SDR 35 sanitary sewer main to connect to the services stubbed out in the City's pervious utility projects on West 86"' Street. ASSESSMENTS This property was assessed and has paid in full for property assessments for the projects that constructed water main and sanitary sewer main under West 86w Street. Currently, no assessments are owed by this property. This parcel has paid the City for one water and sanitary service hook-up. All additional units must pay a water and sanitary service partial hook-up fee at the time of final plat. The remaining hook-up fees would be paid with the building permit. The developer shall work with the Building Department to determine the City SAC and WAC fees for the main building. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required storm water management development standards. Section 19-141 states that "these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features." This site will need to be compliant with the City of Chanhassen's MS4 permit. Part III D. 5 requires that new developments with a disturbance equal to, or greater than, one (1) acre must have no net -increase from pre - development conditions of stormwater discharge volume, total suspended solids (TSS) and total phosphorous (TP). The site will also need to be compliant with the NPDES Construction Permit. The site will fall under the jurisdiction of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District and be subject to their stormwater management rule. This rule requires the abstraction of 1.1 inch of runoff from all new impervious surfaces and removal of 901/o TSS and 60% TP. This is the same removal as indicated in Chapter 19 of City Code. Mission Hills Senior Living• Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 16 of 30 The applicant is proposing to use filtration as opposed to infiltration. The applicant has concluded, based upon the geotechnical report, that infiltration is infeasible as the soils are predominately lean clays which have a low infiltration rate. While this is a condition under which infiltration is limited, under the requirements of both the MS4 permit and the watershed district rules, the applicant must implement, to the "maximum extent practicable" volume reduction techniques other than infiltration. Stormwater re -use for irrigation purposes would be a method, preferred by city staff, for reducing runoff volume. Given that as much as 4.5 acres could be irrigated upon final build out, storm water reuse could also result in a significant reduction in potable water use. The applicant must evaluate the feasibility of other volume reducing practices and provide to the city and watershed district for review. The applicant did provide a summary of the outputs from the P8 model they ran to determine water quality benefits of the proposed practices. The overall annual reductions for the proposed features are 98% removal for TSS and 94% removal for TP. This meets the requirements for water quality treatment. The proposed best management practices will be privately owned. However, as these will be routed to the city's storm sewer system it is in the city's interest to assure that these function as designed for their life. It is also required under the city's MS4 permit that we have a mechanism in place to assure proper operations, maintenance and function of the practices. The applicant must provide an operations and maintenance manual to the city for review and comment. The applicant must provide access to city personnel to inspect the practices and to require maintenance in the event it is not being adequately performed. A draft maintenance agreement is included as part of this report. This will be included as part of the development contract. The design should follow the MN Stormwater Manual guidelines and recommendations wherever possible to do so. The applicant shall provide justification for any deviations from the guidelines. For instance, it has been staffs experience that filter socks around drain tile are prone to failure. The Minnesota Stormwater Manual recommends bedding the underdrain in #57 stone and using a choker course above the bedding. All basins must have pretreatment of water prior to entering the feature. For those areas where curb cuts serve as the inlet, rip -rap is an effective energy dissipation method reducing the risk of scour however, it is an ineffective pre-treatment method. The online Minnesota Stormwater Manual discusses a variety of pre-treatment methods. The applicant should look to this manual for guidance and select an effective pretreatment based upon the recommendation within the manual. City staff has found pretreatment chambers, such as the Rain GuardianTm to be an effective pretreatment practice for curb cut inlets. In areas where storm water is directed to the basin through a catch basin, a sump manhole, at least three feet in depth should be used. This includes the three (3) CBMH labeled 26 on sheet C200. Storm Water Utility Connection Charges Section 4-30 of code sets out the fees associated with surface water management. A water quality and water quantity fee are collected. These fees are based on land use type and are Mission Hills Senior Living• Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 17 of 30 intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the degradation of surface water. This fee will is calculate as shown in the table below. Per acre rate Acres Totals Water Quality $6,240.00 8.64 $53,913.60 Water Quantity $9,140.00 8.64 $79,969.60 Credit ($6,240)0.5 7.68 $23,961.60) Total due at fmal plat $108,921.60 LANDSCAPING requirements for landscaping include 7508 square feet of landscaped area around the parking lot, two landscape islands or peninsulas, 30 trees for the parking lot, and bufferyard plantings along the property lines. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape 7508 sq. ft. >7508 sq. ft. area Overall trees required for 30 trees 30 trees vehicular use area Landscape islands or 2 islands/peninsulas 2 islands/peninsulas peninsulas/parkingpeninsulas/parking lot The applicant meets minimum requirements for trees and landscaping in the parking lot/vehicular use area. Bufferyard requirements: R uired plantings Proposed plantings Bufferyard B —north 5 Overstory trees 4 Overstory trees prop. line, 280' 8 Understory trees 8 Understory trees 14 Shrubs 16 shrubs Bufferyard B — south 5 Overstory trees 5 Overstory trees prop. line, 540' 10 Understory trees 10 Understory trees 20 Shrubs 20 Shrubs Bufferyard A — east prop. 6 Overstory trees 6 Overstory trees Line, 630' 6 Understory trees 6 Understory trees 12 Shrubs 20 Shrubs Bufferyard B — west 20 Overstory trees 21 Overstory trees prop. Line, 1000' 30 Understory trees 16 Understory trees 50 Shrubs 50 Shrubs Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 18 of 30 The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for bufferyard plantings. The north buffer is sufficient since additional plantings would interfere with sightlines at the entrance. The bufferyard along Highway 101 is short on understory trees. Staff recommends that evergreen and ornamental plantings be increased along Highway 101 to provide additional screening for the twin homes at the north end of the project site. PARKS This property is located within the one-half mile neighborhood park service area for Chanhassen Hills Park. Residents of the Mission Hills Senior Living community will have convenient access to this publicly -maintained recreation facility. Chanhassen Hills Park is eight acres in size and features a playground, basketball court, picnic shelter, ball field, benches and walking trails. Off-street parking is also available on Chanhassen Hills Drive South. Bandimere Community Park and Lake Susan Community Park are both located within the one -mile community park service area of the new Mission Hills Senior Living housing. These two parks are more robust in their recreation facility offering including features such as a fishing pier, boat landing, tennis courts, archery range, soccer fields and extensive walking trails. No additional parkland acquisition is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. TRAILS o ~� µ•RA ..��.. SYbjec, Site T� 10, W BANE ZR�'PA W P rPARY ,e The subject site has convenient access to the public trails along Great Plains Boulevard, the three- mile Rice Marsh Lake Trail Loop and the Lakeside trail route to Lake Susan Park. No additional trail construction is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT The site is zoned Planned Unit Development. The designation for the southwesterly portion of the site is commercial. The land use plan designates the site as Mixed Use Development. This category allows commercial uses meeting the daily needs of a neighborhood or high -density residential. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 19 of 30 Amending the PUD ordinance regulating this site will be in keeping with the comprehensive plan. Staff is recommending approval of the amendment and adoption of the revised standards. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FINDINGS The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Fes: The site is guided mixed use (residential and neighborhood commercial). An apartment building and townhouses are a permitted and a reasonable use in this location. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The proposed use is and will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area through the implementation of the design standards, landscaping, architecture, etc. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Finding: The proposed use will conform with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance such as design standards, signage, durable materials, uses, etc. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. Nan in: The proposed use will complement the surrounding area and will not depreciate it. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. Finding: The site is located within the Municipal Urban Service Area. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Find: Based upon traffic studies conducted by the applicant's traffic engineer, traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 20 of 30 SUBDIVISION The developer is requesting preliminary plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot — Mission Hills Yd Addition. Lot 1 is proposed to house an apartment building and nine twin homes. The ordinance states, "All lots shall abut for their full required minimum frontage on a public street as required by the zoning ordinance; or be accessed by a private street; or a flag lot which shall have a minimum of thirty feet of frontage on a public street." The lot has street frontage. Access to the lot is gained from a curb cut off of West 8& Street. The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action and staff is recommending approval with conditions. is i T-` If-• i F /�' .may-_ __ _ �'• Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. SUBDIVISION FINDINGS 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. Finding: The subdivision meets the intent of the city code subject to the conditions of the staff report and the PUD. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable plans. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Findine: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report. Mission Hills Senior Living• Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 21 of 30 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter, Finding: The proposed subdivision will be served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. 7. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. c. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision is provided with adequate urban infrastructure. COMPLIANCE TABLE Lot Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Lot Coverage 50% 46.5%* Building Height Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Principal Four-story Four -Story Building Setbacks Ordinance Requirements Subject Site West Front yard 0' 110, South Front yard 0' 25' North Front yard 0' 30' East Rear yard 50' 65' Parking Requirements Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Stalls 169 169 West Front yard setback 35' 35' South Front yard setback 35' 80' North Front and setback 35' 90, East Rear yard setback 1 50' 120' Mission Hills Senior Living • Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 22 of 30 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following three motions: I. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT "The City Council approves the Planned Unit Development amendment in the attached ordinance for Mission Hills to allow High Density Use on the site and set standards for the structures as shown below (amendments are shown in bold and highlighted in yellow) with the following conditions, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact. 1. The site must comply with the DNR Shoreland Rules. 2. The site shall comply with the following standards: Mission Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD mixed density housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the mixed density housing development shall comply with the requirements of the R-8, Mixed Medium Density District. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below -,the . Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 31d Addition shall comply with the R-12, High Density District. b. Permitted Uses those .. defined herein. The Pype efuse., to beprovided on this outlet ..hall be low intensity neighbor -heed oriented retail and sefviee i-mFlhl uses may inalude small te fnedithn sized restawafft (no drive fiffu windews), effiee, day eafej C,,.._,.hes am eFmit.ed u iR the , :..1 afea of this dist.:et The permitted uses within the development shall include the following: • Single Family Residential • Medium Density Residential • High Density Residential Mission Hills Senior Living• Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 23 of 30 C. Setbacks In the PUD standards, the building setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public right-of- way. The eermnereiel High Density parking setback shall be 35 feet from any public right-of- way and/ or interior property line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the eemmereiel High Density portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: Street Ceffffnereial High Density Building Setback* Residential Medium Density Buildin Setback Residential Parking Setback Commercial Parking Setback* Highway 101 * 50' 20' Highway 212 * 50' 20' West 86" Street * 30' 20' Interior Lot Lines O'(from commercial) 50'(from residential) 0' 0' 0' (from commercial) 1 35' from residential * Setbacks shall be established pursuant to section 20-505 of the Chanhassen City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box Minimum Lot Size multi -family units: Mission Hills: As approved on October 24, 1994 in the Plat of Mission Hills; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 9°i Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 10d' Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 11 d' Supplemental filed May 7, 1996; and Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 12' Supplemental filed May 20, 1996; Mission Hills 2nd Addition: Area: 2,100 square feet Width: 46 feet Depth: 47 feet Mission Hills 3rd Addition: Area: 376,358.4 square feet Width: 480 feet Depth: 620 feet BLOCK USE Net Lot Density Hard Surface Area Coverage outlet Eerumereial ' _42-affes Mission Hills 3.d 152 Multi -Family 8.64 acres 17.5 50% Addition Units Block 1, Mission Hills 138 MUD- amily 18 acres 7.66 37% Block 4, Mission Hills 56 Multi -Family Units 8.92 acres 1 6.28 1 43.2% Mission Hills Senior Living• Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 24 of 30 Building exterior material shall be a combination of prepainted 5-inch aluminum siding and brick. 2. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one-story units and horizontal transom windows over the 2 story windows. Introduce some variation among the buildings through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entry ways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc.). 4. Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front yard. 5. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not 86th Street. 6. The apartment building located on Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3r1 Addition shall: a. Have pronounced entrance. b. Insure that all foundation walls are screened by landscaping or retaining walls. Mission Hills Senior Living• • Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 25 of 30 c. Have materials which include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. e. Site Landscaping and Screening The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. Berms of 2 to 3 feet high shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right-of-way. These berms shall be seeded and/or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/or sodded. Two trees with a minimum of a 21/z inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one overstory evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. 1. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. 4. The Outlot shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. f. Signage One monument sign along Great Plains Boulevard shall be permitted for Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'" Addition. All businesses built A.A.4-h—in the eutlAt shall shffe one faeffument sign. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than two street frontages. The total of each wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed 24 square feet. Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 26 of 30 3. All signs require a separate permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. No illuminated signs within Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'd Addition theeutlet-may be viewed from the residential section of the PUD. 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed three feet in height. 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. RESIDENTIAL One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development. The sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. g. Lighting 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded high-pressure sodium or LED fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum height of a residential street light shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within the eudet Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3r° Addition shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. 2. SUBDIVISION "The City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3'a Addition, as shown in plans dated received December 22, 2014, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Mission Hills Senior Living Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 27 of 30 Park and Trail Conditions Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3nd Addition. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling and $5,000 per twin home dwelling, the total park fees will be $599,200. Engineering Conditions: The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $108,921.60. These shall be due with the final plat. 2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance manual that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity. 3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the City and record that agreement against the property." 3. SITE PLAN APPROVAL "The City Council approves the site plan consisting of a 134-unit senior housing apartment and nine twin homes, Planning Case 2015-01 as shown in plans dated received January 29, 2015, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to the following conditions: Environmental Resource Conditions: The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for approval. The revised plan shall incorporate increased plantings of evergreens and ornamentals along Highway 101 to provide additional screening for the twin homes at the north end of the project site in order to met minimum bufferyard requirements. Building Official Conditions: 1. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. A "Code Record" is required (Code Record schematic plans may be same scale as architectural). For "Code Record" information go to MN Department of Labor and Industry website: http://www.dli.mn.gov/CCLD/PlanConstruction.asp. 2. Buildings must be protected with automatic fire suppression systems. 3. An accessible route must be provided to buildings, parking facilities, public transportation stops and all common use facilities. Mission Hills Senior Living• • Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 28 of 30 4. Parking areas, including parking garages, must be provided with accessible parking spaces dispersed among the various building entrances. 5. Accessible dwelling units must be provided in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. 6. The building owner and/or their representatives should meet with the Inspections Division to discuss plan review and permit procedures (in particular, type of construction and allowable area issues must be addressed). Fire Marshal Conditions: 1. A three-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and yellow painted curbing will be required. Contact Fire Marshal for specifics. 3. Street names are required for the main road entering the project and the loop road serving the twin homes. Street signs shall be installed prior to building construction. Proposed street names must be submitted to Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for review and approval. 4. Fire hydrants shall be installed and made serviceable prior to combustible construction. 5. Prior to combustible construction fire apparatus access roads capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus shall be made serviceable. 6. In lieu of a fire lane to the back side of the building, additional fire protection features shall be provided, including but not limited to Class 1 standpipes installed per Fire Department requirements. Provide to Chanhassen Fire Marshal radius turn dimensions for accessing the building. The concern is the center islands for getting fire apparatus to the front doors. Engineering Conditions: 1. The grading plan must show a spot elevation between the two buildings near Infiltration Basin No. 5, to show that water will flow away from both structures. 2. Proposed grades at the northwest corner of the western parking lot must be revised so as not to exceed a 3:1 slope. 3. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: smooth face, poured - in -place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber. 4. Walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. Mission Hills Senior Livi• • Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 29 of 30 5. Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 6. If a wall is taller than six feet, a fence or other barrier would be required to provide separation from any drive or walkway within 10 feet. 7. The top and bottom wall elevation must be labeled on the southwestem retaining wall. 8. The plans must show names for these streets. 9. The developer's engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7-ton design. 10. The plan set shall include turn movements for a fire truck to navigate the medians for entry access to the main building. 11. The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their plan set. 12. The parking lot aisles must be a minimum of 26 feet wide. 13. Pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements. 14. All water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and must meet the city's requirements for public utilities. 15. This parcel has paid the city for one water and sanitary service hook-up. All additional units must pay a water and sanitary service partial hookup fee at the time of final plat. 16. The developer shall work with the Building Department to determine the City SAC and WAC fees for the main building. 17. All work within the MnDOT right of way must be approved by MnDOT. 18. A full SWPPP meeting all the requirements of the NPDES permit must be provided to the city for review and approval prior to recording the final plat. 19. The applicant shall evaluate the practicality of implementing, to the "maximum extent practicable", volume -reducing practices including re -use. 20. All swales directing surface flows towards surface water features, including but not limited to storm sewer infrastructure, and off the subject property shall be stabilized within 48 hours of cessation of grading activities. 21. Erosion control blanket shall include the swales in their entirety. 22. The design of the stormwater BMPs shall follow the guidelines of the MN Stormwater Manual unless the City Engineer agrees to a deviation for those guidelines. Mission Hills Senior Living • Planning Case 2015-01 February 23, 2015 Page 30 of 30 23. Pretreatment shall be provided for all filtration basins accepting water from driving and parking surfaces. 24. A planting plan for the filtration features will be required before recording the final plat. 25. It is the applicant's responsibility to assure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project. 26. Topsoil shall meet, at a minimum, MnDOT specification 3877-2 "Loam Topsoil Borrow". 27. It is the applicant's responsibility to assure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project. Planning Conditions: 1. The applicant shall work with staff to improve the screening of the southwesterly portion of the site through the use of berming and landscaping. 2. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 3. The site is permitted one monument sign facing Great Plains Boulevard. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance." ATTACHMENTS I . Findings of Fact. 2. Application and Project Narrative. 3. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat. 4. Reduced Copy of Revised Civil Plans dated Received January 29, 2015. 5. Reduced Copy of Revised Architectural Plans dated Received January 29, 2015. 6. Traffic Study dated November 21, 2014. 7. Letter from MnDOT dated December 23, 2014. 8. Mission Hills PUD Ordinance. 9. Letter from Karla Thomsen, President of Mission Hills Garden Homeowners' Association dated October 28, 2014. 10. Letter from David Nickolay, Vice President of Mission Hills Garden Homeowners' Association dated December 5, 2014. 11. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing. g:Vlan\2015 planning cases\201"I mission (tills senior living\sMff report cc.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Mission Hills Senior Living for the following: 1. Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards — Mission Hills. 2. Preliminary Plat to replat 8.64 acres into one lot — Mission Hills Yd Addition. 3. Site Plan Review for the construction of a 134-unit Senior Housing Facility and 9 Twin Homes — Mission Hills Senior Living. On January 6, 2015, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Mission Hills Senior Living for a Planned Unit Development Amendment, Preliminary Plat and Site Plan review (Planning Case 2015-01). The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development -Mixed Use, PUD-Mixed Use. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Mixed Use. 3. The legal description of the property is shown on the attached Exhibit A. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. b) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city s comprehensive plan; c) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e) The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; f) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. g) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. 2. Lack of adequate roads. 3. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. 6. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: a) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted. b) Consistency with this division. c) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas. 0 d) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development. e) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community. 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping. 3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses. 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 7. The planning report #2015-01, dated January 6, 2015, prepared by Sharmeen Al-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development Amendment to the Mission Hills PUD, Preliminary Plat for Mission Hills P Addition, and Site Plan for Mission Hills Senior Living. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 6s' day of January, 2015. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman CU COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECEN'EC Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard w0 0 5 jo i4 CITY OF CUMUMSEN Mailing Address —P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 553 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 CHVIO$SEN PLANNING DE" APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Date Filed:1 _ —14 60-Day Review Deadline: 4 3-1j Planner: Case#:,�Q0/5 ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Rezoning Wlanned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 Minor Amendment to existing PUD................. $100 ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 RO'Site Plan Review ❑ Administrative................................................. $100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts* ...................... $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area Include number of existing employees: _ / and number of new employees: LEI Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit = ADpITIONAL REQUIRED FEES: [VNotification Sign ................................................... $200 [,e(City to install and remove) Lv1 Property Owners' List within 500......... $3 per aaaress: (City to generate — fee determined at preapplication meeting) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents.. $50 per document (CUP/SPRNACNARMAP/Metes & Bounds Subdivision) Project Name: Property AddrE Subdivision ❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot Metes & Bounds .........................$300 + $50 per lot ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑�.of Line Adjustment.........................................$150 Final PI t'................ .. $250 "Requires acl.on. $450 crow for attorney costs. Escrow will be requir-eT or other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way................... $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Variance ............ $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Perot ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal.. ... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ....... .... ................ $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) TOTAL FEES: Received from: Date Received: Check Number: Section 2: Required Information Parcel#: — O Legal Description: M(S5(OKL WILL4,-. 60rigj- M- Total Acreage: Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes 91No Present Zoning: l nl (L6 POE> Requested Zoning: ? V•JJ. — �£$ jldL� Present Land Use Designation: ( Requested Land Use Designation: ga�aiat4 iAA_ Existing Use of Property: LSC� CJ L-hJ 12A L. Description of Proposal: 157-- LJN kT -FnE,�UO2— Hv k`-- .l6 Check box if separate narrative is attached SCANNED Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application, I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application, I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc, with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceel with the study. II certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: �L'f PCZ �7 U ff 6 d tj Contact: AOrc. (�% f/4�64 Address: % 7 SS6 Z e� 6616 X Phone: _21�7_5-?R <- City/State/Zip: L f% GC jr!/%GG ^f / Cell G /? 7,7 3 333-6 tmail:/�7 o 4i C a L GTGLG - ce Fax. Signature: '�f�fce%�� �/ Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this a6licatlon, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc, with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name:_ I<Il yei �1IATZ 7,1c.✓fn5/ LCC Address: 5 qS- L0. K-e 17f i v2 aQl Citv/StatelZin: C-�1aYN hGk,SSeY\ .N1 Al Cc 31-7 Email: Signature: Msr), Com Contact: Xell /601le-lh 0�e Phone: Cell: (0 Fax: qS2— LAIS— 0)3 a Date: I a / y'Ily S/ This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Contact r - v r .. • ' oL Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? `Other Contact Information: ❑ El ❑ ❑ Property Owner Via: Applicant Via: Engineer Via: Other' Via: ❑,,�mail Vg�mail EgEmall ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy ❑ Mailed Paper Copy []Mailed Paper Copy ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: Address. City/State/Zip: Email: PROJECT NARRATIVE Mission Hills Senior living Hwy 101 and 212, Chanhassen, Minnesota Project Team: Owner/Developer Headwaters Development 17550 Hemlock Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 Contact: Michael Hoagberg, Managing Member Phone: 952-378-4386 Email: mhoagbere@CH-HoldingsLLC.com Facility Operator Ebenezer 2722 Park Ave. South Minneapolis, MN 55407 Contact: Susan Farr Phone: 612-874-3460 Structural Engineer BKBM Engineers 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55429 Contact: Tina Wyffles Phone: 763-843-0420 General Contractor Engelsma Construction, Inc. 7119 31" Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55427 Contact: Jeff Engelsma Phone: 763-536-9200 Design Lead / Architecture Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. 4200 West Old Shakopee Road Bloomington, MN 55437 Contact: Eric A. Reiners, AIA Phone: 952-996-9662 email: ereiners@srarchitectsinc.com Civil Engineer BKBM Engineers 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55429 Contact: Keith Matte, PE Phone: 763-843-0464 Surveyor Sunde Land Surveying 9001 East Bloomington Freeway Ste. 118 Bloomington, MN 55420 Contact: Lenny Carlson, PLS Phone: 952-881-2455 Traffic Engineer SRF Consulting Group, Inc. One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 Minneapolis, MN 55447-4443 Contact: Jordan Schwarze, PE Phone: 763-452-4787 0 PROJECT SITE DATA Parcel Basics The existing site is currently an undeveloped, 8.64 acre parcel identified as Mission Hills Outlot E. The property is bounded by Trunk Highway 101 to the west, Trunk Highway 212 to the south, 86`h Street West on the north, and Mission Hills Outlot B with previously developed townhomes to the east. Project Land Use Data The project site falls under the Chanhassen Mixed -Use guiding (Commercial/Residential), and the Mission Hills PUD Neighborhood Commercial zoning. Highway 101/212/Lyman Boulevard Neighborhood Land Use Study completed and published by the City of Chanhassen Planning Staff on October 28, 2008, specifically identified this project parcel as a desirable candidate for senior housing. The property does not fall within any shore land, highway, or other special overlay districts. Under the permitted residential land use for the parcel, residential density calculations as provided by Planning Staff, is comprised of 16 allowable residential units per acre across the 7.72 net site acres (123.5 units), plus 33 total residential units of un-used unit density from the original Mission Hills PUD development. The result is a total allowable zoned site density of 156 residential units. Mission Hills PUD does not specifically govern parking, hardcover, setbacks or building heights and these components of the proposed development will be guided by the city's underlying district guidelines. City ordinance requires 1 parking space for each independent living unit, one parking space for every three assisted living units, plus parking for visitors and staff. Refer to the matrix below for a parking summary illustrating required and provided parking. Parking Required Provided Independent Living Unit 1 per townhouse unit = 18 18 1 per apartment unit = 66 66 Assisted Living Unit 1 for every 3 assisted unit = 23 23 Staff (maximum shift) 1 per employee = 24 24 Guests & Visitors 38 TOTAL PARKING 131+Visitors 169 The site will have a total of 55 surface parking spaces for staff and visitors. This is comprised of 44 spaces directly in front of the main building, and 11 spaces for town home guests. The main building will also have 96 underground parking spaces, and the town home villas will have 18 individual garage stalls bringing the site total to 169 parking spaces. In addition, the driveways leading to each of the town homes has been planned with a minimum length of twenty feet to accommodate additional parking directly in front of each unit if required. Since most of our residents are not expected to drive, we expect many of our employees will park under the main building which will leave surface spaces for visiting friends and relatives. 0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT DATA Program The site will be developed and finished to accommodate a 134-unit, senior housing structure whose primary focus will be to provide independent living, assisted living and memory care apartments to senior citizens together with a full continuum of care allowing the residents to comfortably age in place, while supported by the full range of additional services provided by Ebenezer, the facility operator. Additionally, the site will contain nine (9) twin homes, adding eighteen more independent living units to the development. These single story twin homes will be located on the north end of the site and closest to the site entrance and West 861h Street. Total planned residential units on site will be 152. The site will also include a series of amenities for the residents as well. These amenities include patios, gardens, and walking paths. The walking paths will also connect to the central site circulation as well as the public sidewalk along west 861h Street that was developed as a part of the original Mission Hills development P.U.D. Site The existing site is currently undeveloped, roughly graded for agricultural use, and contains only volunteer vegetation with the exception of its boundary with the town home property to the east, which is densely planted. Many of the mature volunteer trees along the east and north boundaries of the site will be preserved as a part of the final development plan. Under this development plan, however, the site will be re -graded to accommodate the planned building and necessary infrastructure and construction. Impervious surface coverage for this site was not redefined in the original P.U.D. and thus, the city ordinance for this development type will govern, limiting hardcover to 50% and requiring a minimum of 50% green space. As illustrated in the summary matrix below and the summary tables on the Civil Engineering sheets in the submittal set, the green space requirement is met. Developed property area: 376,546 SF 8.644 Acres Building footprints: 81,255 SF 1.865 Acres Total impervious surface area: 175,111 SF 4.02 Acres 46.50% of Site Total green surface area: 201,435 SF 4.62 Acres 53.50% of Site Engineering and Utilities Project civil engineers, BKBM Engineers, together with city engineering staff have worked closely in preliminary stages to accommodate and properly configure the building development, site coverage and storm water management, as well as the requisite utility connections. Storm water management plan, including collection, treatment, infiltration, rate control and discharge are fully explained and detailed within the submittal drawings. Building Design The main building will be a combination three and four-story wood frame structure over a concrete and precast basement — a structural configuration and height implemented elsewhere in Chanhassen at developments such as SummerWood of Chanhassen located just north of this proposed development site. The basement level will house utility, storage and inside parking functions for the structure. 0 • The ground floor will welcome residents and visitors through the main entrance with a covered drop-off, house most of the building's public spaces including commercial kitchen and dining rooms, and connection to the rest of the development amenities. Ground floor will also encompass the primary health care functions, guest suite, a closed 14-suite memory care wing, and twenty-three (23) of the 120 independent and assisted living apartment units will be on the first level. Levels two and three will contain another seventy-five (75) resident apartments varying in size from 514 SF studios to 1,224 SF, two -bedroom, two -bath residences. Selected residences are provided with balconies and other unit amenities. Each floor also contains spaces for health care attendants, and common area functions such as laundry (to supplement washer/ dryers available in most units). Level four will house the final twenty-two (22) residential units. Once again, a cross-section of larger units are provided with balconies to take advantage of wonderful views over the surrounding areas. The fourth level also provides additional resident common areas such as a 20-seat theater, as well as a library that overlooks the entire site, and out toward Lake Susan to the northwest. Exterior building materials will be masonry and painted siding, and the structure will have sloped shingle roofs. Gutters and downspouts will discharge on grade and into catch basins that will flow through storm water treatment areas — on grade and/or below grade — prior to exiting the site. Once again, storm water management plan, including collection, treatment, infiltration, rate control and discharge are fully explained and detailed within the submittal civil drawings. The twin home villas will capture some of the details from the main building creating an aesthetic synthesis of building components across the site, and each individual independent twin home will contain approximately 1,186 finished square feet, plus the single inside garage stall. Miscellaneous Building Components Mechanical screening as required by city ordinance is very limited as most of the mechanical systems are contained within the structure. Limited screening, where required, will be achieved by roof screens designed to coordinate with the building architecture. Site trash enclosure is not illustrated in the development plan and will not be used. Interior trash rooms are utilized in the facility plan, dumpsters will be rolled out on collection days, and back inside to trash rooms following pick up. Site deliveries, move-in/move-out, and building service including trash collection are all achieved on the southwest corner of the building and site at the building's lower level. This service entry point and its access drive are the most remote from neighboring residents and away from all neighborhood traffic and views. Neighborhood Meeting An open neighborhood meeting was held the evening of November 24, 2014 to introduce the project to area residents, summarize the development parameters, review preliminary designs and project images, and answer questions. The development team also wanted to be able to address any concerns the neighboring residents had within the content of the final submittal to the City of Chanhassen. 0 0 The meeting lasted 90 minutes and was well attended by approximately 30 area residents, 17 of whom signed in and left contact information. During the meeting, following the project introduction, the development team answered a variety of questions regarding facility design and operational details, development offerings, proposed development schedule, and rental rates. Feedback by meeting attendees was overwhelmingly positive. One reoccurring concern was voiced by a number of meeting attendees, but not about the Mission Hills Senior Living development. Rather, neighbors are unhappy with the traffic levels and lack of traffic control or a crosswalk at the intersection of West 86th Street and Highway 101. There was also repeated concern regarding the configuration and construction of the existing median in the middle of West 86th Street as it meets Highway 101. The development team relayed the fact to those in attendance, that a traffic study had been completed in conjunction with the planning of Mission Hills Senior Living and that ultimately, the disposition of the intersection of West 861h Street and Highway 101 would be guided by the recommendations contained in the traffic analysis, together with mandates prepared by city and county engineers. Traffic Study A traffic study was completed by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. The main objectives of this study were to review existing operations within the study area, evaluate the traffic impacts to the adjacent roadway network, and recommend any necessary improvements to accommodate the proposed development. Furthermore, this study also provided a comparison between the traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, and those associated with the maximum potential traffic demand under the proposed zoning, which is assumed to be market rate apartments. Results of the year 2017 build intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable range or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. Given the minimal anticipated impact caused by the proposed development on study area traffic operations, roadway improvements are not required under year 2017 build conditions from a traffic operations perspective. An alternative land use scenario was also reviewed to understand the impacts of the highest intensity use allowed under the proposed zoning, which was assumed to be market rate apartments. Approximately 175 apartment units were assumed, which would be expected to generate approximately 89 a.m. peak hour, 109 p.m. peak hour, and 1,164 daily trips. Even under this scenario, results of the year 2017 build intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating within an acceptable range or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under the alternate development scenario. In addition, once again under this heightened use scenario, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. Given the minimal anticipated impact caused by the alternate development on study area traffic operations, roadway improvements would not be required under year 2017 build conditions from a traffic operations perspective. 0 FACILITY OPERATIONS Ebenezer -Proposed Operator The proposed operator of our senior housing community is Ebenezer which is an affiliate of the Fairview Health System. This affiliation with Fairview provides substantial programmatic support and care options for community residents. We expect rapid change in senior care over the next 5 — 10 years as senior housing continues to evolve from a focus on simply housing and hospitality to a more integrated delivery of medical and social care. We believe Ebenezer will be our best option to provide high quality care alternatives for our residents. Ebenezer currently operates our 115-unit senior housing community in Saint Louis Park (Towerlight on Wooddale) and is the proposed operator for the 137-unit senior housing community we are building in Eagan which recently received final city approvals. Ebenezer is the second largest provider of senior living in Minnesota, and had $72.7 million of total operating revenue in 2013. Ebenezer operates 60 communities and manages more than 5,000 units throughout its portfolio in Minnesota. The portfolio includes Independent Living Communities, Assisted Living Communities, Memory Care Communities, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Transitional Care Centers, Adult Day Programs, and Child Care Programs. For more than 90 years, Ebenezer has helped older adults make their lives more independent, healthful, meaningful and secure by creating opportunities for residents to live vibrantly, and participate in the daily fabric of life. Public Benefits of Senior Housing The proposed senior community will benefit the public by providing senior housing for the area so that seniors who have spent their lives in Chanhassen and the surrounding communities remain in the area. Many local seniors will be attracted by the health benefits of a senior housing community as an attractive alternative to the isolation of living alone and the burden of maintaining a home. The proposed facility will help to meet the current housing needs of seniors in the immediate area (several neighbors are on senior housing waiting lists), while also helping to meet the anticipated needs of unmet demand in the near future as projected by a recent independent market study. Senior Living is a great community partner — not only creating a place where people come to volunteer, but also housing people who are interested in contributing back to their surrounding community. Senior Housing residents participate in local churches, volunteer opportunities, and engage in the greater community. Senior Housing, and specifically the programs and activities promoted by Ebenezer, also support local economic development since seniors typically prefer to shop in their familiar community. In addition, Ebenezer brings stable, high quality jobs to the communities in which they operate. There is also no better neighbor than a senior citizen. They are light on the land, streets and park systems, yet senior communities create significant tax base without burdening infrastructure and school systems. 0 Ebenezer prefers larger senior housing communities like the proposed Mission Hills Senior Living since operational efficiencies are gained through larger senior housing developments when compared to smaller ones. Some of the operating benefits of a larger building are listed below: i. A larger facility can afford to offer a broader range of healthcare services, options, and amenities to Chanhassen seniors while limiting disruptive moves from one facility to another for additional care. ii. Creating a larger pool of care staff helps to support stable services for our residents. More hours of care and therefore staffing can be offered to provide more consistent employment, rather than a lot of part-time positions that are more difficult to fill with qualified care givers. This is expected to be increasingly important if the current shortage of qualified nurses continues, as we expect, as our population ages. iii. A larger building allows for more competitive wages and benefits at all levels of staff which typically translates to better care for our residents. iv. A larger facility offers more apartment options, which reduces the chance that families have to split up (i.e. one spouse needs Memory Care and the other can live in an Independent Unit, all under one roof) Additionally, this type of project also provides the public benefit of encouraging a turnover of single family housing in the area. When seniors move into these communities, neighborhoods typically experience younger families moving into the formerly senior owned housing stock which helps to revitalize these neighborhoods. Finally, in addition to construction jobs, Mission Hills Senior Living is expected to employ many people on site as care is provided to our residents 24 hours a day. The building is projected to employ over 50 individuals (FTEs) in a combination of full and part time positions. lr A i ra ; -,r 7 ae\-a�umumn 7� 2 / _�___w; �� �-•�\"�� y`����\\ ♦� _`Y III � u � ��^'....'�'_�::...�"ri�1'r� �'.`• iKi'tWi1 rM] 9l2 _ �mn 10 N�.. �.., ..,...�. e ^ IiMMIM1T. 4KQWpV H!8 JIO MMIRIV ,UII jJSUNOB-�-s- amPLO— am a IMMA YAU 212 �ANDDT RIGHT GF PfldL 771, man Ing s- W-- _ u_.wuu ru li CONTROL —�_. ,......_ P oo I H)rHWAYMO 212 ..__ m Fi.Y.°.'.� TSS.L WIN, --: es"+� mar � z- -. _wars- arm- :.. ss.s?'x�39, • �i� C eG. .:xxr— -MC IF _ 7AlhW FALVMAYNO. 212 zea,, i � • � , _m �G94i9�aN. N m �wrRa wm.1.' m.x--_ o a o 0 E��y- _. . a�ee_ncw •.��•'; JL rzy - FLT H T.w MM3 M.`�„ I I t .:f: r� f- r� V ai® r T i V yt i.�t Yt;L.ii; I CIVIL oEraLs SHEET C401 V 3i,, 11 MISSION HILLS SENIOR LIVING 01 Call HWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WEST A �, CHANHASSEN/ MINNESOTA 6gIq19° PROJECT TEAM a R' �AowAr�ceveLono]i O O n m .. r•; G OC I I ,,—:� OC O O O O ©8 impRpW11QLN:Awu ••.• ...mx. _ — .L�.0 way, EH xew ralrtaci: Ina uo.�Aeo,a •.. m cNe-nnbewocu.uan,tlWLc.rm ifCEAk�'�— � .../[ � ca�meciaa: ::-m � ••�, F.NGELBE'IA ccNB1Po;cTpN, W: _ - IRS 3157 AwAe raat�'oLm,roees]] PNRl: nu)nA.vaO F.... �^`dMlY6 AAGMIiELI: _ BPEPoDEe REINERB AFLMIIELTB. Wc. `�" A]OO ][!i OLD b1YfCR M/O WI]E ]]O r� KKM WiiQI IH lW1 dIddddd CG.TdCT I I I Iyy eiweRMx one LOCATION MAP KEY MAP SHEET INDEX eEarl E�GIr " owmemaY�xw. ... nu... n rortaci: Tw wino npt: RtrL OIYWO �11 •,�n-`I_.I� �� ;� ',f� i�. .....�. cINL:wrou�ec�,r tl' �Zc lane pIO01iTN xw. ' y .f ." w ww, W MMILMARIM NI]4 � �' .�. ♦ A J� a�i, � � .�j Q t7pL: RIAWW, � � tYZJj no..cr art A]CillllCllllAL: J M E LA 6 Z ND BIIPrETRJG � � &UIDE fMl LYt pL0.TWttx 11®IAr` I� ..y r'/' ,„,„„fir] ua�r �nw,w wauuu.rw�oou O Y WIiF,111 T... 1 NvW A� Y/nn,1MIMA1,s1,II1�gIY, %M1MiNAl IM IOtlO ___ '•�-,. �s mrn nuywrw fMdR: LIMY UI6M.N � .0 nl�wnwuwrs N O 1'11RC: lY]ri.]Ns u� n.w uwawn� iPoAifIL BIGAIEPR: ®��� �� CfF fY}JdILTAM GICAIP, EIG .PRE SIEfi [,L CJIIKN N1pWY H[IE1X WiI,IM Ifl1<tl1YN, M �,i L'CnllLf: .YlIOIN KWAIe,R " . PIY.K: RU1 NI�ifl A0.0 ori m 1 7ALIYCFK AYAKV O�A�INI ; YIALL DETAIL (:1 FLKaP01_E DACE SECTION v FSS•.@.fa nFNFL�welMP Q ertE BAN IQrED NorEe: m� ��MMi�l1 TIONAL 8Y1'®OL 6 A4GEBCIDILIT* St .51E P✓N RiNlS OMISSION HILLS SENIOR Ll M CITE RAN RAN ® DOLLdIm DETAIL HANDICAP PARKING BKiJK# RI Iy'R.IIe W.I'a b ®�W.ia mei n i BIW PLAN nowrlENr elr�eEcrloNe ! �---�—_1---------- O W PATIO FENCE COLW'M8 L___J---1 —----------- i--- L--4----J 3 MONIfENT 66 ELEVATIONS /1MEMORT CAlB PATIO PENCE AND =OL ELEVATIONS .NQVLNr TsG MNL .Mm GY FEN Ep ALS A1.2 MOM Lamacn �PL<N w.Ew�r sTn�.r IWRIcatILN NOTEB� MAK/bi^i4WA YM1{7 �HIbICN HILLS 9 1N LIVING BITE PLA ED o® naive lion suoa .L.New ncwu � ? • IMLSCKE VYAN • ry.54.yAlY'ry CfTNLS .wwrsomu[ A1.3 SENIOR LMNG BUILDING NONRAWEST ELEVATION - FRONT CANOPY AND ENTRANCE O O © O O O SENIOR LIVING BUILDING SOUTHWEST ELEVATION - PAwNG GARAGE AND SERma ENTRANCES aiRr}r n' C> O O 0.1 0 o 6 €'11? ' 1 'qgqe�= 199sr � i aaaaaa 101111 z�E 9 zz � a c ZQZ J Z o 0 (n O • MyN B.IILVNG FXIfEf+JCR FIEVAMkiS SENOR LMNG BUILDING NORTHEAST ELEVATION A2.0 0--@ 0 0 0 0 SENIOR LMNG BUILDING SOUTHEAST ELEVASION 3D MEW FROM THE CURB IN FROM OFATW IS HQME VILLA RESIDENCE 0 00 0,,,� •- 0 0 0 0 0 3D MEW FROM FROM THE AR BEHIND A TWINHCME V ILA RESIDENCE C (D (D (D O O O O O FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION FEAR ELEVATION ��dddd z;` OZ �za Nss6 _ biz O� � o .,NMI WONG EXTEItl.'A BEVAMYI . TWWA NW EEEVA¶WS A2.1 I,„I. vAIN(NI3V.FW MAN BUILDING AERIAL VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST CORNER MAN BUILDING AERAL VIEW FROM THE EAST LOOQNG TOWARD HWY 101 MAN BUILDING ENTRY VESTIBULE AND DRIVE UNDER CANOPY aWWlIaaaaa z 5 J p � �Zo O W N F � O 0 <b N S R 3D SI DEAIWM W NEWS A2.2 .„ I II V E W.II.I,✓IBVI w; nn a w `'r—'s VIEW OF SITE Kr+WAY 101 JUST VAST SOUND WALL VIEW OF S7E FROM THE CORNER OF T36TH STREET WEST AND HIGHWAY 101 VIEW OF MNN MONUMENT SIGN ALONG HIGHWAY 101 i s GGdGdd 00 0 rc cZ gp J i W Ls< n _m S q� 9 In (N `o -MST OEVF1041.YIT NEWS A2.3 'VTNI.edl t liN I I N-I lyd V-" Mi A I d. MILIN I. '! T TWTNIOME DESIGN OPTION #3 y4d" J TWINHOME DESK-N OPTION LOCATIONS TWINHOME DESICiN OPTION #4 aaaaaa z s_ C' W N 0 2 N o NIIACESCi: WPONS A2.4 L to CO Ll ,4� P LA DtSII 'E Conwlting Group, Inc. To: Michael Hoagberg Chanhassen Senior Irving Developer LLC From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Senior Associate Jordan Schwarze, PE, Senior Engineer Date: November 21, 2014 Subject: Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Introduction Memorandum SRFNe. 0148676 SRF has completed a traffic study for the proposed senior living facility development located near the TH 212/County Highway 101 interchange in the City of Chanhassen (see Figure 1: Project Location). The main objectives of this study are to review existing operations within the study area, evaluate the traffic impacts to the adjacent roadway network, and recommend any necessary improvements to accommodate the proposed development. Furthermore, this study will provide a comparison between the traffic impacts associated with the proposed development and those associated with the maximum potential traffic demand under the proposed zoning, which is assumed to be market rate apartments. The following information provides the assumptions, analysis and study recommendations offered for consideration. Existing Conditions The existing conditions were reviewed to establish a baseline in order to identify any future impacts associated with the proposed development. The evaluation of existing conditions includes peak period intersection turning movement counts, field observations and an intersection capacity analysis. Data Collection Peak period turning movement counts were collected by SRF during the week of October 27, 2014 at the following study intersections: • County Highway 101 and Lake Susan Drive/TH 212 Westbound Ramps • County Highway 101 and 86th Street Note that the 86th Street/Miusion Hilly Drive intersection tvlumer wen derived from County Highway 101 / 86th Street intersection turning movement muxtr and rxrronnding land use trip generation estimates. Historical and year 2013 annual average daily traffic (AADT) volumes within the study area were provided by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). ONE CARISON PARKWAY, SUrrR 150 1 MtNNEAPous, MN 55447 1 763.475.0010 1 wWw.s"coNsuLnNG.COM ti '1r M PIT-,.. y 1 "r r i 1 r li 4 q IHF Michael Rmgberg Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC November 21, 2014 Page 3 In addition to the intersection turning movement counts, observations were completed to identify roadway characteristics within the study area (i.e. roadway geometry, posted speed limits, and traffic controls). Currently, County Highway 101 is a four -lane divided roadway with a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour (mph). 86th Street is a two-lane roadway with no posted speed limit and parking allowed only along its north side. The study intersections are side -street stop controlled, except the County Highway 101/Lake Susan Drive intersection which is signalized. It should be noted that County Highway 101 is functionally classified as a minor arterial, while other study roadways are classified as local streets. Existing geometries, traffic controls, and volumes within the study area are shown in Figure 2. Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis An existing intersection capacity analysis was completed to establish a baseline condition to which future traffic operations could be compared. The study intersections were analyzed using Synchro/ SitnTraffic software (V8.0). Capacity analysis results identify a Level of Service (LOS) which indicates how well an intersection is operating. Intersections are ranked from LOS A through LOS F. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle, which correspond to the delay threshold values shown in Table 1. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, while LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity. Overall intersection LOS A though LOS D is generally considered acceptable in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Table 1. Level of Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections LOS Designation Signalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) Unsignalized Intersection Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) A <_ 10 5 i0 B >10-20 >10-15 C >20-35 >15-25 D > 35 - 55 > 25 - 35 E >55-80 >35-50 F > 80 > 50 For side -street stop controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the side -street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service. This takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support these volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed to the side -street approaches. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience high levels of delay (i.e. poor levels of service) on the side -street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hour conditions. • ILI;,I Existing Conditions ComWIing 6w.p, In<. Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Figure 2 0148676 Chanhassen, MN November 2014 • Michael Hoagberg November 21, 2014 Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC Page 5 Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 2 indicate that all study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the field or traffic simulation at the study intersections. It should be noted that all results shown represent the SimTraffic analysis due to the proximity of the County Highway 101 /Lake Susan Drive intersection traffic signal and its impacts on operations at the County Highway 101 /86th Street intersection. Table 2. Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay County Highway 101/Lake Susan Drive B 12 sec. B 17 sec. County Highway 101/86th Street) A/B 13 sec. A/A 9 sec. 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive(') A/A 3 sec. A/A 2 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized Intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. Year 2017 No Build Conditions To help determine impacts associated with the proposed development, traffic forecasts were first developed for year 2017 no build conditions (.e. one year after anticipated completion). The no build condition takes into account general area background growth and traffic generated by adjacent developments, if any. The evaluation of year 2017 no build conditions includes details on the adjacent development, traffic forecasts and an intersection capacity analysis. Adjacent Development Based on discussions with City staff, the Preserve at Rice Lake development is expected to be complete prior to the proposed development The Preserve at Rice Lake is located north of TH 212, near the eastern terminus of 86th Street (see Figure 3: Adjacent Development). This adjacent development will consist of 16 single-family homes and is currently under construction. Motorists traveling to/from the Preserve at Rice Lake would primarily be expected to utilize 86th Street, though Mission Hills Lane could also be utilized to access County Highway 101 northbound. Adjacent development trips were estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manxa� Nixtb Edition. These trips were distributed throughout the area based on the directional distribution shown in Figure 4, which was developed based on existing travel patterns within the area and engineering judgment. Results of the trip generation estimates shown in Table 3 indicate that the adjacent development is expected to generate 12 a.m. peak hour, 16 p.m. peak hour, and 152 daily trips. • VN I Adjacent Development Cbmulting G.uap, In, Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Figure 3 0148676 Chanhassen, MN November 2014 Michael Hoagberg November 21, 2014 Chanhassen Senior living Developer LLC Page 8 Table 3. Trip Generation Estimates - Adjacent Development Land Use Type (ITE Code Size A.M. Trips P.M. Trips Daily In Out In Out Trips Single -Family Detached Housing (210) 16 Dwelling Units 3 9 10 6 152 Year 2017 No Build Traffic Forecasts To determine the general area background growth rate, historical AADT volumes and the forecasts presented in the City of Cbanhassen 2030 Conprehenriae Plan were considered. Based on the information available, an annual growth rate of one percent was applied to the existing peak hour and daily traffic volumes. This background growth rate accounts for motorists that are expected to travel through the study area. The resultant year 2017 no build conditions, including general area background growth and traffic generated by the adjacent development, are shown in Figure 5. Year 2017 No Build Intersection Capacity Analysis To determine how the adjacent roadway network will accommodate year 2017 no build traffic forecasts, an intersection capacity analysis was completed using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Results of the year 2017 no build intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 4 indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. Table 4. Year 2017 No Build Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection County Highway 101/Lake Susan Drive County Highway 101/86th Streetitl 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive", A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay B 12 sec. B 17 sec. A/B 13 sec. A/B 11 sec. A/A 3 sec. A/A 3 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection wdh side -street stop control. where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side street approach delay. Proposed Development The proposed development is located along the east side of County Highway 101, north of TH 212 and south of 86th Street. The current development proposal shown in Figure 6 consists of senior housing including 18 independent living townhomes and a 134-unit facility offering memory care, assisted and independent living. The proposed development is expected to be constructed by the end of the year 2016. Access to the development is proposed along the south side of 86th Street across from Mission Hills Drive. Further discussion regarding site access is documented later in this study. Year 2017 No Build Conditions ,� " Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Figure 5 0148676 Chanhassen, MN November 2014 a C /° I Michael Hoagberg Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC Year 2017 Build Conditions November 21, 2014 Pagc 11 To help determine impacts associated with the proposed development, traffic forecasts were next developed for year 2017 build conditions (Le. one year after anticipated completion). The build condition takes into account general area background growth and traffic generated by the adjacent and proposed developments. The evaluation of year 2017 build conditions includes details on the traffic forecasts and an intersection capacity analysis. Year 2017 Build Traffic Forecasts To account for traffic impacts associated with the proposed development, trip generation estimates for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours and a daily basis were developed. These estimates, shown in Table 5, were developed using the ITF_ Trip Generation Manral, Ninib Edition. It should be noted that several land use assumptions were used to identify specific development types and sizes for trip generation purposes based on discussions with project staff. These assumptions are intended to provide a realistic development scenario that could occur. Table S. Trip Generation Estimates - Proposed Development Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size A.M. Trips P.M. Trips Daily Trips In Out In out Residential Townhouse (230) 18 Dwelling Units 1 7 6 3 105 Senior Adult Housing -Attached (252) 67 Dwelling Units 5 9 9 8 230 Congregate Care Facility (253) 67 Dwelling Units 2 2 6 5 135 Total Trips 8 18 21 16 470 Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 26 a.m. peak hour, 37 p.m. peak hour, and 470 daily trips. The trips generated were distributed throughout the area based on the directional distribution shown previously in Figure 4. The resultant year 2017 build conditions, including general area background growth and traffic generated by the adjacent and proposed developments, are shown in Figure 7. Year 2017 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis To determine how the adjacent roadway network will accommodate year 2017 build traffic forecasts, an intersection capacity analysis was completed using Synchro/SitnTraffic software. Results of the year 2017 build intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 6 indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. Given the minimal anticipated impact caused by the proposed development on study area traffic operations, roadway improvements are not required under year 2017 build conditions from a traffic operations perspective. Year 2017 Build Conditions Figure 7 ,� � <mwlung Gwp. Inc Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study . 0148676 Chanhassen, MN November 2014 Michael Hoagberg Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC Table 6. Year 2017 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis November 21, 2014 Page 13 Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay County Highway 101/Lake Susan Drive B 12 sec. B 18 sec. County Highway 101/86th Street'l'I A/B 13 sec. A/B 11 sec. 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive(') A/A 5 sec. A/A 4 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street slop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side street approach delay. Year 2017 Build Conditions - Alternate Development While the proposed senior living facility development is not expected to significantly impact traffic operations within the study area, it should be noted that the proposed zoning of the study property would allow for a more intense land use. Based on discussions with City staff, the highest intensity land use under the proposed zoning is assumed to be market rate apartments. Therefore, to better understand the impacts under an alternate development scenario, traffic forecasts and an intersection capacity analysis were once again completed. Year 2017 Build Traffic Forecasts - Alternate Development To account for traffic impacts associated with the alternate development, trip generation estimates for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours and a daily basis were developed. These estimates shown in Table 7 were developed using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, Ninth Edition. It should be noted that a density of approximately 20 dwelling units per acre was assumed based on an inventory of nearby apartment complexes, which equates to approximately a 175-unit apartment complex. Table 7. Trip Generation Estimates - Alternate Development Land Use Type (I7E Code) Size A.M. Trips P.M. Trips Daily Trips In Out In Out Apartment (220) 175 Dwelling Units 18 71 71 1 38 1,164 Results of the trip generation estimates indicate the alternate development would be expected to generate approximately 89 a.m. peak hour, 109 p.m. peak hour, and 1,164 daily trips. The trips generated were distributed throughout the area based on the directional distribution shown previously in Figure 4. The resultant year 2017 build conditions, including general area background growth and traffic generated by the adjacent and alternate developments, are shown in Figure 8. i 0 ,� D Year 2017 Build Conditions - Altemate Development Figure 8 Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study 014e676 Chanhassen, MN November 2014 • Michael Hoagberg November 21, 2014 Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC Page 15 Year 2017 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis -Alternate Development To determine how the adjacent roadway network will accommodate year 2017 build traffic forecasts under the alternate development scenario, an intersection capacity analysis was completed using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Results of the year 2017 build intersection capacity analysis shown in Table 8 indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. Given the minimal anticipated impact caused by the alternate development on study area traffic operations, roadway improvements would not be required under year 2017 build conditions from a traffic operations perspective. Table 8. Year 2017 Build Intersection Capacity Analysis - Alternate Development IntersectionA.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay County Highway 101/Lake Susan Drive B 13 sec. B 18 sec. County Highway 101/86th Street(') A/C 18 sec. A/B 14 sec. 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive", NA 8 sec. A/A 5 sec. (1) Indicates an unsignalized intersection with side -street stop control, where the overall LOS is shown followed by the worst approach LOS. The delay shown represents the worst side -street approach delay. Site Plan/Access Review A review of the proposed site plan was completed to identify any issues and recommend potential improvements with regard to parking, access spacing, sight distance, traffic control, and circulation. Parking As noted previously, on -street parking is allowed along the north side of 86th Street. Neighborhood concerns were expressed regarding parked cars causing sight obstructions in the vicinity of horizontal curves along 86th Street. However, since all of the parking demand associated with the senior living facility is expected to be accommodated on site, the proposed development is not expected to impact on -street parking. Access Spacing The proposed development access is expected to replace an existing field access along the south side of 86th Street across from Mission Hills Drive. Since the 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive intersection already exists as a full -access intersection, the proposed development access does not represent a significant change in access spacing and is in a logical location. It should be noted that an existing curb cut along County Highway 101 is not expected to be utilized/changed as part of the proposed development. • Michael Hoagbecg November 21, 2014 Chanhaswn Senior Living Developer LLC Page 16 Sight Distance Based on field observations, horizontal curves exist along County Highway 101 to the north and south of the 86th Street intersection. Additionally, a vertical crest exists in the terrain of the study property which limits the sight distance to the south for motorists along 86th Street. Therefore, a review of the existing sight distance was completed. The required sight distance from a minor street, as indicated in A Poluy on Geometric Design of Hi gbways and Streets by AASHTO, is 500 feet for a 45 mph mainline roadway. Based on the field observations at 86th Street, there is approximately 620 feet of sight distance to the south and more than 1,000 feet of sight distance to the north along County Highway 101. Therefore, the sight distance available at the County Highway 101 /86th Street intersection is sufficient to clearly identify approaching vehicles. However, special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping and signing. Traffic Control/Traffic Circulation Internal traffic controls were not identified. However, the following should be considered when designing internal traffic controls: Incorporate traffic controls, signing and striping based on guidelines established in the Manual on Uniform Tmffu Control Devices (MUTCD). o In particular, it is important to identify traffic controls at intersections between internal roadways/driveways to minimize vehicular conflicts and driver confusion. Based on this guidance, stop control should be implemented at the site access to 86th Street to reduce the potential for driver confusion. A review of the proposed site circulation was also completed. The movement of general passenger vehicles within the proposed development is not expected to be an issue. However, truck turning movements should be reviewed to ensure that large vehicles (e.g. delivery/garbage/recycling trucks) have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal roadways. Furthermore, it is recommended that one-way operations be implemented at the access points to the parking lots of the main senior living facility. One-way operations should then be continued into the facility pick-up/drop-off zone to provide an orderly flow of traffic. Finally, it should be noted that the raised median along 86th Street west of Mission Hills Drive will likely need to be modified to accommodate large vehicles exiting the proposed development. It is recommended that the raised median be modified near the 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive intersection to allow for these types of maneuvers. The modification should include striping to help delineate the travel/tum lanes. An illustration of recommended improvements is presented in Figure 9. • VN I Recommended Improvements Conwbing up Inc. Chanhassen Senior Facility Traffic Study Figure 9 Chanhassen, MN 0148676 November 2014 • Michael Hoagbcrg November 21, 2014 Chanhassen Senior Living Developer LLC Page 18 Summary and Conclusions The following study conclusions and recommendations are offered for your consideration: • Results of the existing intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections currently operate at an acceptable overall IAM B or better during the am. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the field or traffic simulation at the study intersections. • To help determine impacts associated with the proposed development, traffic forecasts were first developed for year 2017 no build conditions (i.e. one year after anticipated completion). The no build condition takes into account general area background growth and traffic generated by the adjacent Preserve at Rice Lake development. o An annual growth rate of one percent was applied to the existing peak hour and daily traffic volumes to account for general background growth. o The Preserve at Rice Lake development is expected to generate 12 a.m. peak hour, 16 p.m. peak hour, and 152 daily trips. • Results of the year 2017 no build intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. • The proposed development is located along the east side of County Highway 101, north of TH 212 and south of 86th Street and is expected to be constructed by the end of the year 2016. o The current development proposal consists of senior housing including 18 independent living townhomes and a 134-unit facility offering memory care, assisted and independent living. o Access to the development is proposed along the south side of 86th Street across from Mission Hills Drive. • The proposed development is expected to generate approximately 26 a.m. peak hour, 37 p.m. peak hour, and 470 daily trips. • Results of the year 2017 build intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. o Given the minimal anticipated impact caused by the proposed development on study area traffic operations, roadway improvements are not required under year 2017 build conditions from a traffic operations perspective. • Michael Hoagberg November 21, 2014 Chanhassen Senior living Developer LLC Page 19 • An alternative land use scenario was also reviewed to understand the impacts of the highest intensity use allowed under the proposed zoning, which was assumed to be market rate apartments. o Approximately 175 apartment units were assumed, which would be expected to generate approximately 89 am. peak hour, 109 p.m, peak hour, and 1,164 daily trips. • Results of the year 2017 build intersection capacity analysis indicate that all study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable overall LOS B or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under the alternate development scenario. In addition, no significant side -street delays or queuing issues were observed in the traffic simulation at the study intersections. o Given the minimal anticipated impact caused by the alternate development on study area traffic operations, roadway improvements would not be required under year 2017 build conditions from a traffic operations perspective. • Parking, access spacing, sight distance, traffic control, and circulation were reviewed in the Site Plan/Access Review section. Key recommendations and considerations include the following. o Special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping and signing. o When designing internal traffic controls, incorporate improvements based on guidelines established in the Manna/ on Uiiifoim Traffic Control Deraar. In particular, it is important to identify traffic controls at intersections between internal roadways/driveways to minimize vehicular conflicts and driver confusion. o Implement stop control at the site access to 86th Street to reduce the potential for driver confusion. o Review truck turning movements to ensure that large vehicles have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal roadways. o Implement one-way operations at the access points to the parking lots and pick-up/ drop-off zone of the main senior living facility. o Modify the raised median at the 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive intersection and stripe 86th Street to help delineate the travel/tum lanes. I1:\hS w\8676\T.S\Rr d\8676_Ownbafrrai'aiodariGrTm(fr,4'taAt_ 141121.Aax 0 L �`NNESOTq�O Minnesota Dep • ent of Transportation • Metropolitan District 1 OF To Waters Edge Building 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 December 23, 2014 Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-227-1131 saliaMci.chanhassen.mmus SUBJECT: Mission Hills Senior Living MnDOT Review #P14-069 NE quadrant of Mn101 and Hwy 212 Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1009 Dear Sharmeen Al -Jaffa Thank you for the opportunity to review the site plan and plat for the proposed Mission Hills Senior Living proposed development in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subdivision 2, Plats. Before any further development, please address the following issues: Water Resources: A drainage permit will be required for any development that discharges stormwater to the MnDOT Right of Way/drainage system. The permit applicant shall demonstrate that offsite runoff coming to MnDOT drainage system and/or right-of-way will not increase as a result of the proposed project. This is quantified as a "no increase in discharge" criteria for the 2-year, 10-year and 100-year storm events Please submit documents below for review and approval: 1. Pre and post grading plans and hydraulic calculations to show that proposed flows to MnDOT right-of-way are the same or less than existing conditions. 2. Drainage area maps with flow arrows and labeling that corresponds with the submitted calculations. 3. HydroCAD output or equivalent at the 2, 10, and 100 year Atlas 14 storm events is acceptable for submittal. Please direct any questions regarding water resources to Hailu Shekur (651-234-7521 or hailu.shekurAstate.mn.us) of MnDOT Metro District's Water Resources Section. Traffic Some of the labeling of the highways is incorrect; 101 is shown as Trunk Highway 101 (it should beCSAH 101), and Trunk Highway 212 is shown as Trunk Highway 312. MNDOT also recommends removing the CSAH 101 curb cut to physically eliminate the access and to minimize pedestrians crossing 101 at a midblock location within a curve. For questions regarding these comments please contact David Sheen, Metro District Traffic 651.234.7824, David.SheenAstate.mn.us Permits As mentioned previously, a MNDOT drainage permit is required. Any other work impacting MNDOT right of way will require a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecglp/utility. Please include one 11 x 17 plan set and one full size plan set with each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-234-7911 or buck.craigaac(i,state.mn.usl of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. Review Submittal Options: MnDOT's goal is to complete the review of plans within 30 days. Submittals sent in electronically can usually be turned around faster. There are four submittal options. Please submit either: 1. One (1) electronic pdf version of the plans. MNDOT can accept the plans via e-mail at metrodevreviews.dota,state.mn.us provided that each separate e-mail is under 20 megabytes. 2. Three (3) sets of full size plans. Although submitting seven sets of full size plans will expedite the review process. Plans can be sent to: MNDOT — Metro District Planning Section Development Reviews Coordinator 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, MN 55113 3. One (1) compact disc. 4. Plans can also be submitted to MnDOT's External FTP Site. Please send files to: ftp://ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/pub/incoming/MetroWatersEdge/Planning Internet Explorer doesn't work using ftp so please use an FTP Client or your Windows Explorer (My Computer). Also, please send a note to metrodevreviews.dot(a state.mn.us indicating that the plans have been submitted on the FTP site. • If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 234-7784. Sincerely, 1811* Karen Scheffing Principal Planner Copy sent via E-Mail: Nancy Jacobson, Design Hailu Shekur, Water Resources David Sheen, Traffic Clare Lackey, Traffic Engineering Doug Nelson, Right -of -Way Buck Craig, Permits Diane Langenbach, Area Engineer Russell Owen, Metropolitan Council CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by amending the Mission Hills Planned Unit Development Design Standards in its entirety as follows: Mission Hills Zoning Standards a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD mixed density housing zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below, the mixed density housing development shall comply with the requirements of the R-8, Mixed Medium Density District. Except as modified by the Mission Hills standards below-, 4w Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3`a Addition shall comply with the R-12, High Density District. b. Permitted Uses these as defined heFein. The t�pe of uses to be provided- m; this nuflAt qh-all be low intensity neighbor -hood erien4ed r-etail and seFAee establishmems to meet daily needs of residews. Sueh uses may inelude sfnafl te medium sized r-estaurent (ne dr-ive thm windows), effiee, day ear-e, . The permitted uses within the development shall include the following: Single Family Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential c. Setbacks In the PUD standards, the building setback for commercial is 50 feet from any public right-of- way. The eenamereial high density parking setback shall be 35 feet from any public right-of- way and/or interior property line. There shall be a buffer separating the residential portion from the eemmereial high density portion of the site. This buffer shall be in the form of a berm and landscaping. The following setbacks shall be observed: Street Cerfttuereial High Density Building Setback* Residential Medium Density Building Setback Residential Parking Setback Commercial Parking Setback* .Highway 101 * 50' 20' Hiwa 212 * 50' 20' West 86 Street * 30' 20' Interior Lot Lines O'(from commercial) 50' from residential 0' 0' 0' (from commercial) 35' from residential ■ Setbacks shall be established pursuant to section 20-505 of the Chanhassen City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box Minimum Lot Size multi -family units: Mission Hills: As approved on October 24, 1994 in the Plat of Mission Hills; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 9d' Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 10d' Supplemental filed April 10, 1996; Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 11 w Supplemental filed May 7, 1996; and Mission Hills Villas, A Condominium, Common Interest Community No. 8, 12' Supplemental filed May 20, 1996; Mission Hills 2Id Addition: Area: 2,100 square feet Width: 46 feet Depth: 47 feet Mission Hills 3'd Addition: Area: 376,358.4 square feet Width: 480 feet Depth: 620 feet BLOCK USE Net Lot Density Hard Surface Area Coverage 8uget- Genffaefeial ', -acres Mission Hills Yd 152 Multi -Family Addition Units 8.64 acres 17.5 50% Block 1, Mission Hills 138 Multi- amily 18 acres 7.66 37% Block 4, Mission Hills 1 56 Multi -Family Units 1 8.92 acres 1 6.28 1 43.2% 2 RESIDENTIAL Building exterior material shall be a combination of prepainted 5-inch aluminum siding and brick. Arched transoms and soffit returns shall be used over the entries of the one-story units and horizontal transom windows over the two-story windows. Introduce some variation among the buildings through the shape of windows, adding louvers, shifting entryways, and adding dormers. 3. Colors used shall be earth tones such as soft gray, creamy white, pearl gray, shell white, etc.). 4. Each unit shall have a minimum of one overstory tree within its front yard. 5. All units shall have access onto an interior street and not West 86th Street. 6. The apartment building located on Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3`d Addition shall: a. Have pronounced entrance. b. Insure that all foundation walls are screened by landscaping or retaining walls. c. Have materials which include masonry, painted siding, and exterior finish and insulation system (E.I.F.S.) and the structures will have sloped shingle roofs. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. • 0 e. Site Landscaping and Screening The planting plans prepared for the site are intended to create a strong sense of street tree plantings using overstory deciduous trees such as Summit Ash, Linden, and Sugar Maple. Highways 101 and 212 will be buffered with a combination of overstory evergreen trees and ornamental deciduous trees. The outdoor private living areas will be buffered with the use of evergreen trees. The wetland will be highlighted with the introduction of native wetland species. In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. Berms of two to three feet high shall be added along the Highway 101 and 212 right-of-way. These berms shall be seeded and/or sodded and bushes and trees shall be planted on them. All disturbed areas within the single family lots shall be seeded and/or sodded. Two trees with a minimum of a 2'/2-inch caliper shall be planted within the front yard setback. These two trees shall consist of one overstory evergreen tree and one ornamental deciduous tree. 1. All open spaces and non -parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. 4. The Outlot shall be seeded and maintained in a weed -free condition in all areas proposed for future development. f. Signage One monument sign along Great Plains Boulevard shall be permitted for Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3`d Addition. shall be peffai#ea for toe eut4 .. and o menumen4 sign for Ohe AAl businesses built within the outlet shall share one faeauffleat sign. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than two street frontages. The total of each wall - mounted sign display area shall not exceed 24 square feet. 3. All signs require a separate permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. Signs shall be an architectural feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. 4 • s 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. 6. No illuminated signs within Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition the eetlet may be viewed from the residential section of the PUD. 7. Only back -lit individual letter signs are permitted. 8. Individual letters may not exceed three feet in height. 9. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign. RESIDENTIAL One monument identification sign shall be permitted for the residential development. The sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. g. Lighting 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded high-pressure sodium or LED fixtures. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The maximum height of a residential street light shall not exceed 15 feet. Light fixtures within the eudet Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3`d Addition shall not exceed 25 feet. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23'd day of February, 2015, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenberger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on 5 rJ ■ October 28, 2014 Kathryn Aanenson, Chanhassen Development Director Lyndon Robjent, Carver County Engineer Dear Kathryn & Lyndon: This letter is to request that the Mission Hills Garden Homeowners' Association would like to start discussions with the city and county about traffic control as the result of future development of property located on the southeast corner Highway 101 and West 86tn Street in Chanhassen. Currently, the property is for sale, Barr Engineering has done soil borings during the past two weeks, and a surveying company is surveying/staking the property. As you are aware, a new housing development is currently being built on West 86tn street and Tigua Lane. The combination of new traffic from this development plus the traffic generated by future development of the property on the SE corner of 101 and W 86tn Street will compound the current traffic issues to access 101 from W 861n The Mission Hills Homeowners' Association represents 56 homes on the West Side of W 861n Street. A majority of our residents are retired and considered senior citizens of our community. We are concerned for the safety of our association members as they access the 101 & 86" intersection. The current median on West 86th & 101 will need to be redesigned to accommodate the access from future development of the SE corner property currently for sale. The existing driveway off of W 86th to this property was not designed to handle large amounts of traffic. It was designed for a farmer field access. The control of traffic at 101 and W 86tn to allow residents using 861n to access 101 is our biggest concern. We would like to see a controlled signal intersection but are open to other traffic control systems to manage traffic at this location. Please consider this letter our request to be participants in the planning and design meetings for the future intersection of Highway 101 and W 86th Street. Respectfully Submitted, Karla Thomsen, President Mission Hills Garden Homeowners' Association Our Board Member Dave Nickolay is the board representative assigned to work with the City and County. He can be reached through the following: Mail: 552 Mission Hills Dr Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: 952-974-5285 Email: acmadave@gmail.com December 5, 2014 Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner City of Chanhassen Dear Sharmeen: 'ITYUCHANHASSU RECEIVED OEU 0 h 2014 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT This letter is in follow-up to our telephone call yesterday and the letter you received dated October 28, 2014 concerning the proposed senior housing development on the southeast corner of Highway 101 and West 86th Street. As we discussed, the Mission Hills Garden Homeowners' Association would like to be involved in the planning discussions concerning the redesign of the West 86th median where it intersects with Mission Hills Drive, leading to Highway 101. We also request that we be involved in the planning of the changes to the intersection of Highway 101 and West 86th Street resulting from the increased traffic from all area development. Our biggest concern involves the control of traffic at 101 and 86th, making a left hand turn or going south on 101 is a problem today, and will grow with the two housing projects being connected to 86th in 2015. As we also discussed, future development on the west side of 101 on the remaining open land should be taken into consideration at this time. Also the city trail that crosses 101 at 86th will also need to be addressed. As an association we request the City give serious consideration to working with all government agencies involved to construct a roundabout on 101 where it intersects with 86th. If the roundabout is not feasible, we are open to other traffic control systems to improve the current problem of left hand turns/south bound 101 traffic coming out of 86th Street. SCANNED Sharmeen, please consider this letter to be our second request to be participants in the planning and re -design meetings for the future intersection of Highway 101 and W 86`h Street. Respectfully subm David F Nickolay, Vice President Mission Hills Garden Homeowners' Association • 0 n CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on December 24, 2014, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Notice of Public Hearing for Mission Hills Senior Living — Planning Case 2015-01 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribvd and sworn to before me this 2 ay of Z"tnnj10 r , 2014. (�KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public -Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2016 Notary P blic Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision and Site Plan Review with Variances for a 134-unit senior housing structure Proposal: and 9 twin homes (18 independent living units) on 8.64 acres of property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) MISSION HILLS SENIOR LIVING Applicant: Headwaters Development Property Outlot E, Mission Hills (8600 Great Plains Boulevard) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-01. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff by email at saliaff(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952- Coommemmensnts:: C 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Remnings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any Interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting. staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the hem and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included In the report to the City Council. ff you wish to have something to be Included In the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Date & Time: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later In the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for PUD Amendment, Subdivision and Site Plan Review with Variances for a 134-unit senior housing structure Proposal: and 9 twin homes (18 independent living units) on 8.64 acres of property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) MISSION HILLS SENIOR LIVING Applicant: Headwaters Development Property Outlot E, Mission Hills (8600 Great Plains Boulevard) Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about th applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborh4 about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-01. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmeen AI-Jaff by email at saliaff(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952- Questions & 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Plannin Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews. Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party Is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or panty the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/Industnal. • Minnesota Slate Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. • ANDREW B SANVICK ANDREW J BRONCZYK 582 MISSION HILLS WAY W 311 WINKLER CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 COLOGNE, MN 55322-4510 ANNE M SUDDENDORF APPLE TREE ESTATES LLC 525 MARSHLAND TRL 545 LAKE DR APT 205 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9323 BARBARA J W ELLUMSON BERNARD M & JOANN C GAYTKO 577 MISSION HILLS DR 521 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 BEVERLY HAFFNER BONNIE JEAN THURK 509 MISSION HILLS DR 537 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 BRETT WEIGEL BRIAN & LOUANN KLINGELHUTZ 576 BLACKBIRD CT 9731 MEADOWLARK LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7703 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8626 BURTON BRANDRUD CAROL K GELDERT 584 MISSION HILLS DR 557 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 CAROL R VENEZIA CARVER COUNTY 586 MISSION HILLS WAY W 602 4TH ST E CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 CHASKA, MN 55318-2102 CHRIS & ALANNA LIEBHART CONNIE M MOEHL 3051 VENEZIA TER 8540 MAYFIELD CT CHINO HILLS, CA 91709-6610 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 DALE E HETLAND DAVID B & ALLISON C ORFIELD 524 MISSION HILLS DR 587 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 DEBRA J MCGARRY DENNIS R & DIANE E SIEFKER REV 569 MISSION HILLS DR 588 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 ANNE M SAMUELSON 583 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 ARDIS M OLUFSON 565 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 BEVERLY E CHRISTENSEN 517 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 BRAD H & CAROL M W ILLMSEN 8510 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9749 BRIAN A & LOU ANN D KLINGELHUT 8860 KLEIN DR WACONIA, MN 55387-4566 CAROL L ERICKSON 549 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 CHANHASSEN GATEWAY PLACE LLC PO BOX 10 ALBANY, MN 56307-0010 COREY ALLEN MILLER 589 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 DAVID F NICKOLAY 552 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 DIANE M DEPOE 548 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 DONNA LEVASSEUR DREW D CARLSON DUANE D & DONNA M MOORE 599 MISSION HILLS WAY W 531 MISSIONS HILLS WAY W 536 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 EDWARD MILLER ERIC J BORM ERIC W & MEGAN E TEALE 579 MISSION HILLS WAY W 6972 PIMA LN 550 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9230 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 ERW IN C & CLARA MAE SIDER FREDERICK Q KAMPS GARY R SCHULTZ 553 MISSION HILLS DR 8410 WATERS EDGE DR 8507 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8698 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9749 GEORGE W & LESLIE GILMAN GORDON G WAINWRIGHT GRACE REGALADO 7470 ATHERTON WAY 595 MISSION HILLS WAY W 525 MISSION HILLS DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346-4410 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 GREGORY A & DANA J OHNSORG GREGORY A MARTELL GREGORY SELLS 8500 WATERS EDGE DR 568 BLACKBIRD CT 3808 DOTTY ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9749 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7703 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-2715 HARTIN FAMILY TRUST HEATHER J HEYER HEATHER L TRIMBLE 540 MISSION HILLS DR 3526 GRIMES AVE N 597 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55422-2838 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 HEATHER M RUDNICKI HEATHER S VALITON HEIDI L BUCKENTINE 561 MARSHLAND TRL 547 MISSION HILLS WAY W 558 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 HOUCK INVESTMENTS LLC HOWARD M LONGPRE J A & JUDITH A HRUBY 776 APPLEWOOD CIR 561 MISSION HILLS DR 8544 MAYFIELD CT VICTORIA, MN 55386-8254 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 JANE M VANDEN PLAS JANET E BROWN JARED A KRUEGER 567 MISSION HILLS WAY W 501 MISSION HILLS DR 596 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7717 JAY ANDREW ELLIOT JEFFREY RAYMOND SICHENEDER JENNIFER YOUNGS 639 SPRINGHILL RD 8508 WATERS EDGE DR 529 MARSHLAND TRL # 45 SAINT PAUL, MN 55127-3598 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9749 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 Cl JOCELYNE RYAN 576 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 JONATHAN M SCHLUETER 564 BLACKBIRD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7703 KAREN J CWAYNA DOUGHERTY 533 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 KELLEY P BENTLEY 534 MISSION HILLS W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 KENNETH J & GARNITA A WENCL 8412 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8698 LAUREL J BOSECK 592 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-7716 MANEESH BHAGAT 125 MAIN ST SE #130 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55414-2161 MATTHEW L & KATHLEEN ALBRECHT 6220 CASCADE PASS CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9476 MELISSA A MUIR 22485 CANTREL WAY FARMINGTON, MN 55024-4011 JOHN F & SHIRLEY M ROBINSON 8502 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN. MN 55317- JULIE A STOLL 554 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 KARLA K THOMSON 8524 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 KELLIE L WEILBRENNER 543 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 KIM M FEIST 565 MARSHLAND TRL CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-7711 LENORE J MOLSTAD 589 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 MARIE L & JEAN E ANDERSON 539 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 MATTHEW R KLEY 3136 3RD AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408-3221 MICHAEL S & STEPHANIE R DILLE 291 TIMBER HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9129 JOHN S & BARBARA A JACOBY 8516 WATERS EDGE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9749 JULIE L JORGENSON 570 MISSION HILLS WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 KATHY J MCKIM 533 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 KENNA PROPERTIES LLC 1096 SYMPHONY LN CHASKA, MN 55318-4589 KLINGELHUTZ FARMS LLC 545 LAKE DR APT #205 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9323 LYNETTELAABS 541 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 MARY MILLER 591 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 MATTHEW S RUDDYJR 8520 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 MISSION HILLS GARDEN HOMES 2681 LONG LAKE RD ROSEVILLE, MN 55113-1128 NAJLAA OUALLEN NAM T NGUYEN NANCY J GOLLING 566 MISSION HILLS WAY W 551 MISSION HILLS WAY W 590 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 • 0 NORMAN C JR & KIMBERLY GRANT PAMELA R MURRAY PATRICIA STRUCK 9021 LAKE RILEY BLVD 529 MISSION HILLS DR 563 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8650 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 PATRICK A HUTTNER PATRICK S & CONSTANCE PHYLLIS J RILEY 532 MISSION HILLS DR SULLIVAN 538 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 8500 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 RENEE D WALSTROM RICHARD & EVELYN J KETTLER ROBERT C & SUSAN J ERICKSON 581 MISSION HILLS DR 8521 MAYFIELD CT 513 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 ROBERT J BAUER RODNEY A FERROZZO RYAN L MAAS 569 MARSHLAND TRL 560 BLACKBIRD CT 594 MISSION HILLS WAY CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7703 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 SAMANTHA BOLAND SEAN S WARK STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 530 MISSION HILLS WAY 549 MARSHLAND TRL 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRAN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 ST PAUL, MN 55155-1801 STEPHANI K THYKESON STEPHEN W JONES JR SUSAN M DEAN 545 MARSHLAND TRL 553 MARSHLAND TRL 8525 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7711 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 THOMAS H BERGE TIMOTHY B LAMBERT TRUST OF DOROTHY S JAMES 545 MISSION HILLS DR 578 MISSION HILLS WAY W 8501 MAYFIELD CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7719 URBAN CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC VALERIE LUEBKE VI QUANG 5421 TRACY LYNN TERR 562 MISSION HILLS WAY W 542 MISSION HILLS WAY W MINNETONKA, MN 55345-4237 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7701 VICKIE L NOVAK VICTORIA L OLENDER VIOLA MARIE COLLINGHAM LIVING 516 MISSION HILLS DR 585 MISSION HILLS WAY 573 MISSION HILLS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7715 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 VIRGINIA A WELLUMSON WAYNE L BEAN WILLIAM D HEINRICH JR 585 MISSION HILLS DR 593 MISSION HILLS DR 598 MISSION HILLS WAY W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7716 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-7702 E ZETTEL INVESTMENTS LLC 19580 VINE RIDGE RD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-9118 Littfin, Mark From: Littfin, Mark Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 11:29 AM To: AI-Jaff, Sharmeen Subject: FW: Mission Hills Senior Living. Apartment building and twin homes. Planning Case 2015-01, Site plan review Sharmeen, I have reviewed the site plan for the above project and have the following comments. 1. A 3 foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. "No Parking Fire Lane' signs and yellow painted curbing will be required. Contact Fire Marshal for specifics. 3. Street names are required for the main road entering the project and the loop road serving the twin homes. Street signs shall be installed prior to building construction. Proposed street names must be submitted to Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for review and approval. 4. Fire hydrants shall be installed and made serviceable prior to combustible construction. 5. Prior to combustible construction fire apparatus access roads capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus shall be made serviceable. 6. In lieu of a fire lane to the back side of the building, additional fire protections features shall be provided. Including but not limited to Class 1 standpipes installed per Fire Dept. requirements. 7. Provide to Chanhassen Fire Marshal radius turn dimensions for accessing the building. The concern is the center islands for getting fire apparatus to the front doors. 9VarkLittfin Chanhassen Fire Marshal 7700 Market Blvd. PO box 147 Chanhassen MN. 55317 Direct 952.227.1151 Fax 952.227.1190 ScS 'Il—'t agIV,(i tO SRa. , TRANSMITTAL TO: Sharmeen AI-Jaff City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 FROM: Eric A. Reiners, AIA PROJECT NAME: Mission Hills Senior HOUSIn CITY 10KHANHASSEN RECEIVED FE-3 0 6 2015 CHANHASSEN PUNNING DEFT 4200 W. Old Shakopee Rd.#220 Bloomington, MN 55437 (952) 996.9662 (952) 996.9663 - fax PROJECT NO: 14-040 DATE: 2/2/2015 The items below are transmitted: FOR YOUR INFORMATION El VIA: MAIL FOR YOUR REVIEW MESSENGER�� FOR YOUR APPROVAL PERSONAL DELIVERY FOR YOUR USE F—xl PICK-UPO FOR YOUR RECORDS UPS -NEXT DAY�� AS REQUESTED El DESCRIPTION: OTY. DATE ITEM DESCRIPTION 1 2/2/2015 Transmittal 6 1/29/2015 Architectural SheetA2.3 revised 6 1/29/2015 11x17 color version of the revised Architectural Sheet A2.3 COMMENTS: CC: Mike Hoagberg & Greg Zoidis - Headwaters Development Susan Farr & Jill Nokleby Kaiser - Ebenezer Jeff Engelsma - Engelsma Construction VIEW OF SITE FROM THE MAIN ENTRY DRrVE VIEW OF SITE HIGHWAY 101 JUST PAST SOUND WALL _.— ��—�-.,�—kc--.�G -C3 . 1 �t^_�ZI •[- `=A e 11. ..Y'l t—_ l VIEW OF SITE FROM THE CORNER OF 86TH STREET WEST AND HIGHWAY 101 V F\V OF MAIN MONUMENT SIGN ALONG HIGHWAY 101 m u P CAa x GY €alpb 4�`iir rd CVTyOF REC A ED SEN FEB 0 3 Z015 CWIWH ASSEN PLANNING OEP' II � r o Z zoG J boy CK 0 azz U Z w J_ �Z O ZQw Ln o40 T i C • 3D SIZE DEVELOPMFM NEWS �oa'w van w.v n: xz a®mn u A2.3 SCANNED 0 • VIEW OF SITE FROM THE MAIN ENTRY DRNE L y..�...__ -.. VIEW OF SITE HIGHWAY 101 JUST PAST SOUND WALL MEW OF MAIN MONUMENT SIGN ALONG HIGHWAY 101 p s P� b Cy �daM ppp!p D �aiyT I his I CITY OAF ANEDSSEN FEB 0 3 2615 CRANHRM PONN114G DEPT Z > � az of � � ij O Z w can J J_ Z P= Z m 0 (n o_ • 3D SIZE DEWCPWENT MEWS VIEW OF SITE FROM THE CORNER OF 86TH STREET WEST AND HIGHWAY 101 A2.3