The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-01_ROSSAVIK ADDITIONFinance Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $100 which represents a refund of Phone: 952.2271140 the development notification sign escrow for the above -referenced project. MY OF CgANHASSEN March 16,2W6 7700 Market Boulevard . PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Sincerely, Administration Mr. Arild Rossavik P:952.21100 8800 Powers Boulevard Fax: Fax: 952227.17.1110 Natural Resources Chanhassen, MN 55317 Building Inspections Kim T. Meuwissen Phone: 952.227.1180 Re- Development Notification Sign Escrow Refund Fax: 952.227.1190 1591 Park Road Rossavik Addition - Planning Case No. 06-01 Engineering Phone: 952 227,1160 Dear Mi. Rossavik, Fax: 952 227.1170 Finance Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $100 which represents a refund of Phone: 952.2271140 the development notification sign escrow for the above -referenced project. Fax. 952,227 1110 Park a Recreation If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 952-227-1107 or by email at Phone: 952.227,1120 kmeuwissen@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Fax 952.227.1110 Recreation Center Sincerely, 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phooe.952.227.1130 Kim T. Meuwissen Fax: 952.227.1110 Planning Secretary Public Works 1591 Park Road KTM:ms Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952227.1310 Enclosure Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www ci.chanhassen.mn.us SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geal place to live, work, and play. Vendor: ARILD ROSSAVIK Vendor No: rossaril Invoice Number Date 6700 03/15/2006 0 ' Vendor Acct No: Description Sign escrow refund Check Date: Check Amount: r 03/16/2006 $100.00 Invoice Amount 100.00 CITY CHANHASSEN M&1 MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK 128662 7700 MARKET BLVD., P.O. BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 17 1 IS9' ° (952)227-1140 Pay: ***One hundred dollars and Zero cents Date Amount 03/16/2006 $100.00 To the order of: ARILD ROSSAVIK 8800 POWERS BLVD, f� L CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 I 11°12855211' 1:091001571: 00257... 77312115 ::ITY ,6;F CHANHASSEN . 0 7*00 MARKET BLVD 2HANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: O Date: 10/19/2005 Time: 11:35am Please return check to Kim for Receipt Number: DW / 6700 mailing with letter. Thanks! Clerk: DANIELLE DVLP SIGN -8800 POWERS BLVD ITEM REFERENCE AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- DEVAP DVLP SIGN -8800 POWERS BLVD SIGN RENT 75.00 --------------- Total: 175.00 Check 6028 175.00 --------------- Change: 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! OK to return sign escrow. bT:3 l� Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Date . , • C1rPY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 02/22/2006 1:05:44 PM Receipt No. 0000570 CLERK: danielle PAYEE: Darrell Rodenz GIS list-Rossavik Addition 06-01 ------------------------------------------------------- GIS List 126.00 Total Cash Check 20118 Change 126.00 0.00 126.00 0.00 SCANNED FROM :RRILD ROSSRVIK i n Arild Rossavik 570 West 780' Street Box 2001 Chanhassen MN 55317 February 18 2006 City Of Chanhassen FAX NO. :+300642330364 Ref, Invoice for mailing Rossavik Addition case 06.01 FEB. 10 2006 12:20PM P1 I just today (I am overseas) received notice of your invoice for $126.00 Which has to be paid by Feb 21" I therefore fax you check #6283 drawn on my Americana Community Bank in Chanhassen to meet your deadline to cover this invoice Sincerely Arild Rossavik Ph 011 380 642 34 13 15 Fax 011 380 642 33 03 84 Attached : Check #6283 Account Arild Rossavik #844746 Americana Community Bank routing 091901969 AMD ROSSAVIK 88M POWERS BOULEVARD PH. 952.44"" CHANHASSF.N,MN SS17 h�tiu la. .J..n �Nl�Unl� Anaalk � 7 \% b 1 MR ### 7 7#x-1#9 sit' 6283 #44746 I)AI'll_p.-:– 1ZvV 6 lZG- 8 a__a. SCANNED .9:09 Lq0 >,9691:. 84 4 74 6�i 06 2$ 3� SCANNED RECEIPT NY OF 7700 MARKET BLVD. • P.O. B01 47 CHMIMSEN PHONEA317 (952) 22 N 50500 RECEIVED OF O No. 78264 DATE DESCRIPTION I PERWLIC. I AMOUNT I FUND I SOURCE I OBJ. I PROD. TOTAL AMOUNT�� CHECK 11 CASH [I {CANNED oQ l' O • • Ool City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Invoice P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 qffuf (952) 227-1100 To: Arild Rossavik 8800 Powers Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ship To: SALESPERSON DATE TERMS KTM 2/9/06 upon receipt QUANTITY I DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 42 Property Owners List within 500' of 8800 Powers Boulevard (42 labels) 33.00 $126.00 TOTALDUE $126.00 NOTE: This invoice is in accordance with the Development Review Application submitted to the City by the Addressee shown above (copy attached) and must be paid prior to the public hearing scheduled for February 21, 2006. Make all checks payable to: City of Chanhassen Please write the following code on your check: #06-01 Rossavik Addition. If you have any questions concerning this invoice, call: (952)-227-1107. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN NIDI 553 01/10/2006 9:42: Receipt No. 0000262 CLERK: danielle PAYEE: Arlid Rossavik 8800 Powers Boulevard Chanhassen MN 55317 Rossavik Addition ------------------------------------------------------- Use & Variance 1,475.00 Rezoning Fees 500.00 Total Cash Check Change 0.00 1,975.00 SCANNED 0 0 ROSSAVIK ADDITION 06-01 $600 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $500 Rezoning $675 Subdivision $200 Variance $1,975 $1,975 Arild Rossavik Check 6267 SCANNED CITY JF CHANHASSEN "X700 • • MkRKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: ARILD ROSSAVIK Date: 10/19/2005 Time: 11:35am Receipt Number: DW / 6700 Clerk: DANIELLE DVLP SIGN -8800 POWERS BLVD ITEM REFERENCE ------------------------------------------- AMOUNT DEVAP DVLP SIGN -8800 POWERS BLVD SIGN RENT 75.00 SIGN ESCROW 100.00 Total: --------------- 175.00 Check 6028 175.00 Change: --------------- 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! SCANNED V ` RECO Vl l l OF 7700 MARKWD. • P.O. BOX 147 ' C[f��QSEN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 NO_ 78090 (��(��((��)SEN PHONE: (952) 227-1100 i RECEIVED OF k-1 PnSSSC�f, .� DATE �Q 6 WANNED 0 i The contents of this file have been scanned. Do not add anything to it unless it has been scanned. A 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION A pjc ant Name and Address: CaCC 0_s Ft IK, S O 75?ti_ �X2004 C 414 N 14 f•? 5.5 is N Contact: Phone:449 4844 Fax: Email: CKr-V,0j-i3-� ttb Planning Case No. dto —U M CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JAN 0 6 2005 CHANHASSEN Pi ANN[Nr Mc Owner NarnQ and Address: } 1 J_ J u&'?s cur J F� 4 00 Contact: Phone: Fax: Email: NOTE: Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Interim Use Permit (IUP) LNon-conforming Use Permit _ ram— , Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Pian Review Site Plan Review (SPR)* (,77_� Subdivision - Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements (VAC) 200 Variance (VAR) Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign— $200 A Irad.l "t' (City to install and remove) I ke 'C1 4 pe" X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** - $50 CUP/SPRNACNARNVAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ S Pd c" f"u` An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. *Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/:" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 (*.tif) format. **Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED 0 0 PROJECT NAME: IF-v4.�s C�,-" 17 Jdt Lo,, LOCATION: RSOC7 e'-PO-A� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: fru-%A- o c, TOTALACREAGE WETLANDS PRESENT: YES V NO PRESENT ZONING: tl -2- REQUESTED ZONING: 2 L P PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: S/ Yv�ti Cri/c!i— x �C1� C C�� L ash �cako; Cwy,� -P"CT zl C � zoo -6 This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owners Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. a ('�]z 6tk 200-6 Signature of Applicant Date 22-N Signature of Fee Owner Date GApLAMforms\Devet6pment Review Application.DOC Rev. 12105 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED IAN 0 6 2006 January 5, 2006 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT City Council and Planning Commission City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Rossavik Subdivision Dear Council and Planning Commission Members: I have now made application to rezone my property on Powers Boulevard to permit its subdivision into five (5) building sites. This is my fourth request to the City in ten years. I first proposed a six (6) lot subdivision. That was rejected as too intense and untimely a use. Next, I proposed a five (5) lot subdivision which was recommended by staff, but was rejected as untimely and too many lots. Since then the commencement of construction on Highway 312 and the approval of a 400 plus unit residential development immediately to my south has initiated changes to the area which will permanently alter the character of the area. And now there is an application pending for 30 single family lots around the corner on Lyman Boulevard. My neighborhood can no longer be seen as an Estate district. Rather it will be a transitional residential area along a principal north -south arterial highway, traveled by thousands of cars a day. Having submitted a subdivision proposal of three (3) lots,(See Exhibit "B") in an effort to address past concerns of the city on density, I am now advised by city staff that three lots is too few. They advise that a change from Estate to Residential - Low Density zoning necessitates 1.2 - 4 lots per acre and not the 0.9 lots per acre a three lot subdivision of my land would create. I would point out that a contributing reason for the lower density calculation is that a substantial portion of my land is unbuildable drainage way and bluff or steep slope. Please understand that, a six lot subdivision would have accommodated the future subdivision of neighboring property to the north by way of a cul-de-sac built in part on both properties. (See Exhibit "A"). My neighbor has declined to so participate. In fact my neighbor has made it clear he does not want the cul-de-sac on his side of our common boundary. The five lot proposed subdivision is possible. (See Exhibit "C"). It relies on a cul-de-sac built exclusively on my lot. This reduces, but does not eliminate, access to the cul-de-sac from my neighbors lot. 0 The three lot subdivision does not require a cul-de-sac. Without the cul-de-sac future subdivision options of my neighbors property are affected. Quite apart from the subdivision question, I desire to connect my property to the metro sewer system and retire the antiquated septic system serving my property. The municipal sewer service was stubbed in adjacent my neighborhood in1996. Connection is mandated by City Code Section 19-4. To date the City has been unwilling to allow me to connect. My connection to sewer will not necessitate connection to the system by my neighbors. Allowing my subdivision and sewer connections would begin to amortize the $260,000 in sewer mains expended by the city. I believe the most practical and reasonable subdivision is the 5 lot plan. The density is right under Residential -Low Density zoning. It creates a cul-de-sac benefiting both the City and my neighbor without cost to either. Moreover the drainage and utility issues have been addressed by my engineers to the satisfaction of city staff. As discussed in my earlier correspondence to the City, re -zoning of the property is now appropriate. The only question is whether the subdivision should be 3, 5 or 6 lots. I look forward to your guidance on the desired subdivision. Sincerely, Arild Rossavik cc. George Bizek 8750 Powers Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 1r`rr1 � :L r 2 ". _ SS S S RS S S.SS' 8 N y O e Z i � '_{ iAgE R C� V 1r`rr1 � :L r 2 ". _ SS S S RS S S.SS' 8 N y O e Z W � R C� V VU O b ' Z U 1r`rr1 � :L r 2 o 8 N y O e Z W � R C� V VU O u OS Z U J� J •J 5 1�4 1r`rr1 � :L r Sf 8 N e Z R T N 0 0 § ' � %,f R � \ |,* c, m = |:m 2 9999 ) § ' � %,f R 0 "¢ Rig s-� ILI yTz F''S.7 DEAL l-GAMEL U" Sm"OlL' tr[G' gw w`a«L CITY OE CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JAN Q 6 2006 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPt Scc!e 1" — 50 ft ^1 n n I' IA/rT -^ V V L_- I A r\rI,TI/ln I 7�LitJ1 I IVI v N 89'00'00" E 395.74 0 AR A5\ LOr :. SEX, r_ .Ane so f• -Sa rt to' E. BLOC+' '- .9.WV 50. F ta] ). ROC, :- 115?9 50 ff 'ITo. SLCQd :- 211:1 sO ft ` p.99e 50 w .0 -Ps- - ..-. ".. -:'�S1L AREA- 271./11x R c'!less otn< rise rofed on drawing !vete. Lots .5 Br b w37 be E_. Kea bK &ji ewp9 e. It LEGAL DESC-RIP_ION toes 1 a 2 S+ z + L:;5^- Grw_ NAd P"» BW Pewem >E/-EL•pE �xq:En h Ceyr eve:. idmnossm. Yy S`.1'7 faf<19D-IJ2? �.. �•'EY1�R. Cemms—;aaW Land x3^. Y.�M ise v1-ma.T. W 55N? 559- c4A Zor,nq - Ex;stlr;q A-> Pro;:. se.i Serbo.^ts Rif - .?O Few: r• u . :0 i'Se' CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED JAN 0 6 2006 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT N 0 A M 150 Scale V = 50 ft Revised December 12, 2005 Revised July 14, 2004 Revised August 8, 2003 - 3 lots Revised April 22, 2003 Revised April 1, 2003 Revised march 27, 2003 Revised February 7, 2003 Revised February 6, 2003 Fevised December 27, 2002 Revised December 18, 1997 Revised December 15, 1997 Revised June 10, 1996- Driveway easements I4�9 BOB9IPap, P!L 0.e rrw lr,� a w1 r.Y�, v �r � 316-1D r-sv I PRELIMINARY PLAT gg9 0.9 1�g' J / / °p J / LOT COVERAGE: LOT 1, X" 1, F 3122 Sa. T. DyNeeny = 195 50. FT / Tohl = 390 M. FT. I Net Mea BLJ6a3 Sa. FT. LIT I co.ervge = 1..8% BIJp = 1&51 Sa FT. 713 9a FT Trial = zsu Sa FT / IYt Mea = 33.78RW = FT. LOT 2 careraBe = 7AX / LOT 3. 8LO 1, qyp 3600 M FT. / Or. RIB SII FT. Total= 3317 W. FT. / Net . = 29.261.750. FT. LOT 3 ce—.1 = u1z I Tata, [aver9Bn 10,398 = FT. iota) Net Mea 61.760.3=. FT ITotal Carpeaar 1 47. I r� arab s an:10ye e....enn are wen uaF. rgr-wr � TMc n: s9om ,.., w doc ROSSAVIK ADDITION AREAS LOT I, XL 1- 95,9715 is FT. LOT 2, XL I- Js.731.9 Sa FT. LOT 3, N.OIX 1- 30.1596 M FT. TOTAL AREA- 162,205 m FT. 60 X 60 Building Site (typ.) unless otherwise noted on drawing -Building Sites to be Custom Graded - Note: Lots 2 8 3 Wil be served by driveway easement Drainage 8 Utility Easements are 10 feet kn width along street lines and 5 feet in width along lot lines. (unless noted otherwise on drawing) I PREPARED FOR PID: 25-3530020 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, bat E. 0 I. NXLStX WS OWNERS 8 DEVELOPER, M d Rosavh ebW Wve„Bwl317 " pgNussen, M' SSJI] 361 66G SURVEYOR, p¢narz-Gabiel LaM Svreyms, Le. 3030 t, WI Late 6511] 559-& , 559-0906 Zoning - Existing A-2 Proposed RSF Setbacks RSF - 30 Feet Front 30 Feet Rear 10 Feet Side ARILD ROSSAVIK CITY F EN CEDSSEN IAN 0 6 2006 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT c c� JJ J I r MST. J mn a]36 1°°r r N Scale 1' = 50 ft Revised January 0, 2006 Revised December 30, 2005 - 5 lots Revised August B, 2003 - 3 lots Revised Aprii 22, 2003 Revised April L 2003 j Revised March 27, 2003 Revised February 7, 2003 Revised February 6, 2003 Revised December 27, 2002 Revised December 10, 1997 Revised Decenber 15, 1997 Revised June 10, 1996- Driveray easenents I FA b� q MISL i M� A gg9 ,9 1olo' O66vr s O h w r m II SA7.1 hsg s rte n .nm od�Mlg ror rrn; ,.resr ., a �rve od m revr n .ry, .gt+wq .-a.�--•' a sMznm tiv WaR LOT 1. ®.OX 1- 2LOI1 LOT 2. l I- 23147 LOT 1 K T- .L].O. up .. &= T- 3c499 LOT 5, 4N( 1- 21.K3 eOYFRS [rR[LT- 16,1186 TOTAL AREA- 162,205 1-1 `60 X 60 Building Site (ton 60 X otherwise notSite (on dna ring Note: Lots 2 & 3 will be served by driveway easement. Drainage & Utility Easenents are 10 Feet M width along street Imes and 5 Feet a+ vidth alcng 1.c. r.== (un(ess noted otherwise on draring) PIA 25-353aR0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION+ L.o[ 2. Am L ULLSOC 61KS OVNERS & DEVELOPER MMp ROSGa v4 999p Panes b.Yle.nr'tl 36,41ar Si/RVEyOR: Y rs-6Ob41 Lor4 Sv'veyo-z. IK. 3030 Ma�kv LOM %yna,T. MX 55.11 569-V908 0 1T COVERAGE: n1, KOX 1. A� 36[w sa Fr. firo m FT. raMl = 391] s¢. FT. Men = I8.B9LFT. = Mjj 36¢J S¢ !T. .996 11 = zas9n rc'eee = 195X 01 1 &W, 1 sa FI rMroy = .m 59. FT ]Ofal = .Otll S8 R 3913aysa FT 'v—Oe = m2X Or 1, Ain T. NR 5¢. Fl. .9s ro. FT raPot = 3911S0. FI. p< Mrn =56..99 Sa Fr f➢1 . cowen¢e =10.8,' LOT 5, K0.% 8 IZ r = ]f9p sn FT.FT.m 5¢ . lotd a .Odl 50. FT. Mrn =16.).86 SO R. LOT . cere W -2s9X Zoning - Existing A-2 Proposed RSF Setbacks RSF - 30 Feet Front 30 Feet Rear 10 Feet Side PRELIMINARY PLAT I PREPARED FORT — ROSSAVIK ADDITION ARILD ROSSAVIK 59 ^iTY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED .'"N 0 6 2006 ,HANHASSEN PLAWNG DEPT / i M� A gg9 ,9 1olo' O66vr s O h w r m II SA7.1 hsg s rte n .nm od�Mlg ror rrn; ,.resr ., a �rve od m revr n .ry, .gt+wq .-a.�--•' a sMznm tiv WaR LOT 1. ®.OX 1- 2LOI1 LOT 2. l I- 23147 LOT 1 K T- .L].O. up .. &= T- 3c499 LOT 5, 4N( 1- 21.K3 eOYFRS [rR[LT- 16,1186 TOTAL AREA- 162,205 1-1 `60 X 60 Building Site (ton 60 X otherwise notSite (on dna ring Note: Lots 2 & 3 will be served by driveway easement. Drainage & Utility Easenents are 10 Feet M width along street Imes and 5 Feet a+ vidth alcng 1.c. r.== (un(ess noted otherwise on draring) PIA 25-353aR0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION+ L.o[ 2. Am L ULLSOC 61KS OVNERS & DEVELOPER MMp ROSGa v4 999p Panes b.Yle.nr'tl 36,41ar Si/RVEyOR: Y rs-6Ob41 Lor4 Sv'veyo-z. IK. 3030 Ma�kv LOM %yna,T. MX 55.11 569-V908 0 1T COVERAGE: n1, KOX 1. A� 36[w sa Fr. firo m FT. raMl = 391] s¢. FT. Men = I8.B9LFT. = Mjj 36¢J S¢ !T. .996 11 = zas9n rc'eee = 195X 01 1 &W, 1 sa FI rMroy = .m 59. FT ]Ofal = .Otll S8 R 3913aysa FT 'v—Oe = m2X Or 1, Ain T. NR 5¢. Fl. .9s ro. FT raPot = 3911S0. FI. p< Mrn =56..99 Sa Fr f➢1 . cowen¢e =10.8,' LOT 5, K0.% 8 IZ r = ]f9p sn FT.FT.m 5¢ . lotd a .Odl 50. FT. Mrn =16.).86 SO R. LOT . cere W -2s9X Zoning - Existing A-2 Proposed RSF Setbacks RSF - 30 Feet Front 30 Feet Rear 10 Feet Side PRELIMINARY PLAT I PREPARED FORT — ROSSAVIK ADDITION ARILD ROSSAVIK 59 ^iTY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED .'"N 0 6 2006 ,HANHASSEN PLAWNG DEPT rLrIAOr rnm i 0 • Planning Case No 1.1 I T Or Lo11ANHAjjtN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Applicant Name nd Address: Owner Name and Address: 9.1 LD OS.S ilc P9/1-0 T C>S_&9v1�c Lx Zoo (, S} x Sf t K g O O `�C5-t� —L . 11 N J 4k CA> Contact: Contact:. dsa «tom' Phone:"g Fax: Phone�44z8 ,Y2? 1; 4 Fax: Email P RV— ti R1 t'V Us Email: 11 R- 2 f4 R / c. D, U c,. NOTE: Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of pians 63 00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Interim Use Permit (IUP) Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* 4 � Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review* 3 OD Subdivision* Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements 200 Variance (VAR) Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign** - $75 + $100 Damage Deposit X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost*** - $50 CUP/SPR/VAC/VARANAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ 16 O 0 An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. *Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8'/Y" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 (*.tif) format. "*Applicant to obtain notification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. ***Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED 0 December 5, 2005 City Council and Planning Commission City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Sewer and Water Service Dear Council and Planning Commission Members: 9 In recent years, I have made application to rezone my property on Powers Boulevard so as to permit its subdivision into additional building sites. My four acres would support two additional home sites without adversely impacting the area. Doing so would not "over develop" the area nor is it premature. The development of Highway 312 and the planned development of 444 homes immediately to the south makes rezoning appropriate. The intensity of traffic caused by that development changes the character of my neighborhood greatly and permanently. Continued zoning of the property as Estate- large lot is no longer appropriate. You will soon be receiving, or have received, my application for the rezoning and platting of my property for three building sites. I hope you recognize that such a rezoning is not only appropriate, and reasonable, but fits well with the existing and future use and development of the area along Powers Boulevard. Ten years ago, the City installed sewer and water service, as well as sewer stubs, to service my neighborhood along Powers Boulevard. It would seem entirely reasonable that the City, having invested $260,000.00 ten years ago, would welcome and encourage, even mandate, that properties be connected. Re -zoning and the addition of 2 new houses in the neighborhood will at least begin to amortize that cost. There is some urgency, as I would like to connect my property to the municipal sewer system, before my 20 year old septic system fails, but so far the City has refused to allow me to do so. This in direct contrast with the City policy and Chanhassen City Code Section 19-41 B. That section mandates that all buildings and structures constructed within the City after March 11, 1985 adjacent to sewer, be connected to sewer. Under your Comprehensive Plan, the availability of adequate sanitary sewer system is a Primary consideration to be taken into account in determining the appropriate land use within the City. The availability of sewer and water is directly related to the intensity of development that can be permitted. Here sewer and water availability is not an issue. In fact connecting homes to the system is past due. 9 0 The present rezoning request is timely. The recently approved 444 townhouse development just south of Lyman Boulevard and the opening of Highway 312 will cause tremendous traffic flow along Powers Boulevard. My property and that of my neighbors, all zoned Estate District will soon be fronting the busiest street in the community. While these properties have heretofore enjoyed an ex -urban feel, no one can pretend that will be the character this neighbor in the years to come. It is not reasonable to insist that this area is appropriately zoned as an estate district. Change has come because of development the City courted and desired. It has come independent of anything anyone in the neighborhood has done. The present application is the fourth in a series. The last request was recommended by City staff, but rejected by the City Planning Commission as untimely. The changes described above clearly show that rezoning is no longer untimely. I respectfully request that the City change the zoning as I am requesting for my property and perhaps for the entire area. I look forward to working with you to accommodate the City's requirements and needs in conjunction with my proposed subdivision. Sincerely, 5Lk-'( 4 ' `l'%'S'."J't Arild Rossavik Box 2001 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Enclosures r Arild Rossavik 8800 Powers Blvd Chanhassen AN 55317 March 8, 2005 Editor Chanhassen Villager Richard Crawford Re: Powers Blvd Lift Station n U Ph. 952.448 4844 Email: AR@JRILD. US 7e-mail, from Matt Saam., P.E. Asst. City Engineer- Chanhassen, March 2005, the city has acknowledged that City Code Sec. 1941b controls the conditions which mandate sewer connection. There is not another ordinance that controls sewer connections. To avoid the operation of the law, the City advises that "staff interprets this code requirements to mean if your building is within 150 feet of the sewer, then you are required to connect". This interpretation does nothing to explain away the two reasons the code gives as circumstances mandating sewer connections . Moreover the interpretation is not justified as necessary in the public interest is thereby served. The code speaks of three reasons. All in the alternative, which triggers the need to connect to sewer. The other reasons are: [I ]"All buildings... on premises adjacent to a sewer of the City sewer System or [2] in a block through or to which the sanitary systems extends, or..." Clearly, the proximity of the lift station/sewer trunk in the street fronting Hillside Oaks, Block 1, can not be ignored, nor so easily dismissed. 0 • The sewer trunk line is in the public right-of-way in front of these premises (properties) , therefore they are adjacent the sewer and the premises front a "block through or to which the sanitary sewer extends". To connect, no additional trunk line must be first constructed. That the trunk line was built off center, on the east side of the right -a -way, is immaterial. Stubs are already in place ready to serve the west side of Powers Boulevard, so the 7 existing Septic systems can be retired, It appears the city's "interpretation" will effectively relieve premises that front wide boulevards, i.e.., 120 ft wide Powers Blvd, from any requirement to connect to the City sewer System, unless one property owner "elects" to connect, which now would trigger a mandate for the adjacent property owner to connect! This debate begs the question; Why is Chanhassen willing to invoke such tenuous, convenient, and strained "interpretations" to avoid requiring sewer connections 10 years after service became available? Who benefits? In issuing the interpretation the City continues a disregard for public monies invested and the fiduciary duty to recoup that investment by mandating sewer connection. But for, this narrow and constricted interpretation, the city would be many dollars ahead and undesirable septic system would be retired . Sincerely k2 Arild Rossavik cc. Matt Saam, Chanhassen City Council, City Manager, cc. Tom Caswell, Metro Council 0 Arild Rossavik 8800 Powers Blvd Chanhassen AN 55317 Mayor and Council Members City of Chanhassen MN 55317 Feb 2005 n L-A Ph. 952.448 4844 Email: AR(7aARILD. US Re: The Use of Zoning to Excuse Hillside Oaks from City sewer and water Connections and Assessments. Dear Mayor and Council Members Ten years ago Chanhassen City Project 93-29 improved Powers Blvd and extended sewer and water, (including a lift station) for seven homes in Hillside Oaks Block 1. This neighborhood on the west side of Powers Blvd just north of Lyman Blvd (Co. Rd. 18) was at the time zoned RLD — Residential Low Density * On project completion the properties were scheduled for Trunk sanitary sewer and Trunk water main assessments of $2425.00 each. * [CSAH17 (powers Blvd) Improvements City Project 93 -29 -Assessment Roll B]. Despite the 1993 plan to assess the properties and the public interest in. and long term Public Policy of, assessing benefited properties for improvements, no home in this neighborhood was ever assessed, no monies have ever been collected, and the trunk line and lift station stands unused. Why?, because the City Council urged on by then Planning Commission Member, (now City Council Member), Peterson (who lives in the neighborhood ), moved to change the Zoning of this small area from RLD to A-2 Large Lot (2.5 Acre minimum). Doing so allowed the City to decline to assess the properties for trunk sanitary sewer and water main and defer any assessment to when the properties elect to connect to City sewer and water. [Correspondence of C.D. Folch , P.E.,.Dir Of Public Works/City Engineer 9.9.97] 0 0 Unlike the balance of the City abutting Trunk Sewer and water mains, the Hillside Oaks Development continues to employ septic systems and individual wells for water. None have connected to the system. The continued use of septic systems is a source of ground water pollutions and threatens the water quality and environment of the wetland on the eastside of Powers Blvd. Moreover, annually the City continues to carry the burden of unrecovered construction costs and connection fees, as well as lost sewer and water service fees. Is not Large lot preservations a good thing? Typically, yes. However, here the surrounding zoning of this diminutive area was already RLD Residential Low Density. ' To the north are duplexes and town homes, to the west, the properties are guided RLD, and soon 1400 new homes are to be built in a compact neighborhood to the south. In Chanhassen Large Lot Zoning is found along the open lands fronting Minnesota River Bluffs, not small islands of land amongst town homes and heavily traveled arterial boulevards. So on Monday February 10, it was no surprise when the City Council received a staff report on the merits of restoring the RLD zoning of Hillside Oaks ,(Council Member Peterson recused himself) and voted to take no action. This is the fourth refusal in ten years. Three times I have requested that the zoning of my Hillside Oaks property be restored to RLD zoning to permit additional lots. Each time Mr. Peterson's political ability to preserve himself to the continued deferment of Trunk line, connection and service fees, has blocked my request. How long can the leadership of the City continue to refuse a reasonable request to zone property in a manner consistent with the surrounding area, and mismanage public finances, by refusing to collect monies due? Apparently indefinitely, unless the community takes note of this tacit deal (to accord special treatment and privileges to City politicians), nothing will change. Sincerely S6-:J.A]2ooNcuok Arild Rossavik • [CSAH 17 City Project 93-29] Encl. CC: Tom Caswell, Metro Council The Editor, Chanhassen Villager Arild Rossavik From: Arild Rossavik [ar@arild.us] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 9:16 AM To: Arild Rossavik Cc: 'ar@gxci.us' Subject: FW: Powers Blvd. Lift Station 0 -----Original Message ----- From: Saam, Matt [mailto:MSaam@ci.chanhassen.mn.us] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 1:21 PM To: ar@arild.us Cc: Generous, Bob; Gerhardt, Todd; City Council; Oehme, Paul; editor@chanvillager.com Subject: Powers Blvd. Lift Station Mr. Rossavik, In response to your e-mail, I have checked on the maintenance that City staff performs on the lift station near your property along the east side of Powers Blvd. City staff does not perform any extra maintenance on this lift station due to no one being hooked -up to it. Each year our utility staff inspects the pumps, seals, and electrical controls as they do with all other lift stations in town. The amount of maintenance needed on this lift station is, in fact, less than what is required for other, more heavily utilized lift stations in town. Also, as a point of clarification to your citing of City code sec. 1941b. The code states that, "All buildings and structures constructed within the city after March 11, 1985, on premises adjacent to a sewer of the city sanitary sewer system, or in a block through or to which the sanitary sewer system extends, or is within 150 feet of said sanitary sewer system, shall be connected to the city sanitary sewer system for the disposal of sewage or industrial waste." Staff interprets this code requirement to mean if your building is within 150 -feet of the sewer, then you are required to connect. With the sewer being on the east side of the road, none of the existing homes in your neighborhood meet the 150 -foot requirement. That is why they are not required to connect. Let me know if you have other questions. Thanks, Matt Saam, P. E. Asst. City Engineer - Chanhassen, MN 10/29/2005 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SEWER AND WATER INVESTMENT POWERS BOULEVARD 1993 Improvement Costs: $260,000.00 Income Associated Therefrom to Date: $ -0- 6% Annual Holding Cost Compounded Over 7 Years Current Cost Unrecouped: $390,943.87 Additional Holding Costs; 10 Years at 6%: $309,177.05 TOTAL: $700,120.92 Annual Maintenance Cost: Estimated at 3% of Original Investment: $ 7,800.00 Annual Maintenance Costs to Date Unrecouped: $ 54,600.00 Additional Maintenance Costs Over the Next Decade: $ 78,000.00 TOTAL COST TO CITY in Failing to Recoup Sewer and Water Investment Through 2013: Approximately $832,000.00 http://206.10.76.61weblink7/ImageDisplay.aspx?cache=yes&sessionkey=WLImageDispia.. II/l/2005 a q ' mm y $7$] 1 L LIJ ;• 1 .�i http://206.10.76.61weblink7/ImageDisplay.aspx?cache=yes&sessionkey=WLImageDispia.. II/l/2005 September 9, 1997 CITY OF CHARRAMEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 9 FAX (612) 937-5739 Arild Rosavik 8800 Powers Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317-9030 RE: CSAH 17 (Powers Boulevard) Improvements City of Chanhassen Project No. 93-29 Dear Mr. Rossavik: The City Council will hold a public hearing to consider proposed assessments for th, CSAH 17. (Powers Boulevard) Reconstruction Project, Improvement Project No, 93-29, on Monday, September 22, 1997, at 6:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers at 690 Coulter Driye, Chanhassen, Minnesota. The area to be assessed includes parts of Sections 19, 27 and 56 T 116 R 25. Your property was originally proposed to be assessed trunk sanitary sewer and water main charges as a part of the project. After further review, the City has elected 1st to assess the;thmk charges to your property at this time. Assessments to your property will, therefore, not be ., > considered at the Council Meeting on September 22, 1997. The trunk sanitary sewer and water main charges will instead be billed to your property if and when you connect to these facilities in the future. The charges will be billed based upon the rates at the year of connection. Please feel free to call me at (612) 937-1908 if you have any questions or need additional information.. Sincerely, CITY OF CHAN SEN Charles D. Folch, PE Director of Public Works/City Engineer December 13, 1995 Arild Rossavik 8800 Powers Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 9 FAX (612) 937-5739 Re: Notice of Public Hearing for Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17) Improvement Project from Trunk Highway 5 South to Lyman Botilevard = Project No. 93-29 Parcel No. 25-3530020, Lot 2, Block 1, Hillside Oaks Dear Property Owner: Notice is hereby given that a public hearing has been scheduled for public discussion on the Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17) from Trunk Highway 5 south to Lyman Boulevard, Project No. 93-29 feasibility study at the City Council's regular meeting on Monday, January 8, 1996 at 7:30 p.m in the City Hall Council Chambers located at City Hall, 690 Coulter Drive. Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17) is proposed to be reconstructed to a four -lane, divided urban roadway.with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, trails, street lighting and landscaping. The total project cost of said improvements is estimated to be approximately $4,400,000. Said improvements are proposed to be financed by a combination of special assessments to benefiting properties, local funds, and County fiords. YOUR PROPERTY IS PROPOSED FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. A copy of the feasibility study showing the project scope, costs and proposed assessment is available for revie:v in the Engir=rng Departr..rt, N4ondays through Frdays f am 8.00 a.m to 4:3_n p ,n. . Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN Charles D. Folch, P.E. Director of Public Works CbRktrt KELLY LAW OFFICES Established /948 MARK W. KELLY WILLIAM F KELLY (1922-1995) December 2, 2005 Mr. George Bizek 8750 Powers Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Proposed Subdivision/Rossavik Property Dear Mr. Bizek: 351 SECOND STREET EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331 (952)474-5977 FAX 474-9575 Recently, you were contacted by Epic Development looking for your participation in a joint effort to rezone both my clients' property and your property. Doing so could allow future development. Apparently, an agreement was not able to be reached thereon. My client understands the issue to have been one of price as well as the impact of a potential cal -de -sac which is necessary for such development. As you know, Mr. Rossavik remains interested in developing his property, especially in light of the changing circumstances of the neighborhood through additional development to the south. Mr. Rossavik wishes to advise you that he will soon make application for the rezoning of his property so as to permit the platting of the Rossavik property with three lots. If three lots are approved, there will not be need for a cal -de -sac and no cal -de -sac will be built. It remains that you may. wish to join in the rezoning application so that you may position your property for future redevelopment. Rezoning does not necessitate the sale or development of your property. If you wish to discuss this matter, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Mark W. Kelly MWK/tas cc: Arild Rossavik | § | ., \k �! | § | \k ,. / )\ !/§ {!) §|||{^ §§� � |■ k § b Z � y X, |I \k .ma / )\ !/§ §§� ■§ |■ k § b � ;,|![ 0 0 . - ! § . It \ \�' ! � all � aq+M2 Q+/|a ■ !, �( # , . . - ! § . It \ \�' ! � all � aq+M2 Q+/|a ■ Powers Circle • • May 5, 2003 Page 19 OVER AND gE OF CHANHASSEN NNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT ,!' IN RE: AND RECOMMENDATION Application of Arild Rossavik for rezoning, land use amendment and subdivision. On May 6, 2003, the Ch meeting to consider the a Bassen Planning Commission met at its re application of Arild Rossavik for rezoning regularly scheduled Estate District, A-2, to Single Family g Property from A Residential District, RSF Agricultural Residential age Lotto Residential , a land use amendment from Low Density and preliminary plat with a of a private street approval for a five lot Public hearing on variance anCe for the use proposed the The Planning Comm fission conducted a Published and mazy rezoning land use The and subdiviion preceded by Persons wishing notice. The Planning s Commission heard testimony from all interested g to speak and now makes the following: 2. 3. a FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District, A-2. The Property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Large The legal description of the prop g Ordertis: Lot. The Zoning y Lot 2, Block 1, Hillside Oaks. ordinance directs the planning Commission to adverse affects of the Proposed amendment.6 consider six () possible regarding them are: The six (6) affects and our findings a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific Provisions of and has been found to be consistent policies and Plan. with the official City Comprehensive b) The proposed use is eon c) The proposed use does Patible with the present and future land use of the area. pro s conform to all Zomig Ordinance subject to Performance standards contain J the revisions of the plat recommended by staff. ed in the Powers Circle • May 5, 2003 Page 20 d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. (r e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our findings regarding them are: 1) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The proposed subdivision meets all minimum ordinance requirements for RSF zoned properties. 2) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the intent of the comprehensive plan, subject to approval of the land use amendment from Residential — Large Lot to Residential — Low Density. 3) The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to revisions to the development plan specified in this report. The applicant is proposing conservation easements over the western portion of the development to preserve the trees and steep slopes. 4) The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision will be served by adequate urban infrastructure with a variance for the use of a private street. 5) The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage to site topography through grading and removal of vegetation. Restrictions on the housing types Powers Circle • • May 5, 2003 Page 21 and limitation of the grading area will reduce the developments impacts on natural features and abutting property. 6) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Findine: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. 7) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. C. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. Findine: The proposed subdivision is provided with adequate urban infrastructure 6. The planning report #97-12 Sub. dated May 6, 2003, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning, land use amendment and subdivision creating five lots. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 6th day of May, 2003. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION 14V ATTEST: Secretary g:Aplan\bg\development mim\pow circle 2003 mvised.doc Its Chairman