The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-04_RESIDENTIAL PUD AMENDMENTS FILE 1 OF 2 - GENERAL FILEThe contents of this file have been scanned. Do not add anything to it unless it has been scanned. Planned Unit Developonts Review Schedule 6/25/2013 Plat Name Case # Underlying Zoning Researched Action Staff Ord. Number Notification Date Neighborhood Meeting Staff Ord FF Public Hearing Council ARBORETUM VILLAGE 92-03 R-8 AK Amendment Only 530 3/5/2012 N/A ✓ ✓ ✓ 4/17/2012 5/14/2012 HIGHLANDS AT BLUFF CREEK 03-03 R8 BG Amendment Only 531 3/5/2012 N/A ✓ ✓ ✓ 4/17/2012 5/14/2012 LIBERTY ON BLUFF CREEK 02-03 R-8 AK Amendment Only 532 3/5/2012 N/A If ✓ ✓ 4/17/2012 5/14/2012 CHES MAR FARM 84-02 AK Complete ✓ ✓ ✓ CHANHASSEN GATEWAY 05-01 R16 51 Complete ✓ ✓ ✓ LAKESIDE 06-26 BG Complete ✓ ✓ ✓ SOUTH WEST VILLAGE SJ Complete ✓ ✓ ✓ LAKE SUSAN HILLS WEST Si Complete ✓ we If CHANHASSEN VISTA 86-01 RSF BG New Ordinance BG 534 4/6/2012 Tue 4/24/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ ✓ ✓ 5/15/2012 5/29/2012 CHAPARRAL 78-01 R-4, R-8 BG New Ordinance BG 535 4/6/2012 Tue 4/24/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ if ✓ 5/15/2012 5/29/2012 CHESTNUT RIDGE AT NEAR MOUNTAIN 79-02 RSF BG New Ordinance BG 538 4/6/2012 Tue 4/24/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ ✓ ✓ 5/15/2012 5/29/2012 City Center Park, Saratoga Add (Hanson) 98-2 R-12 BG New Ordinance BG 541 4/6/2012 Tue 4/24/2012 Rec Ctr If If ✓ 5/15/2012 5/29/2012 FOX HOLLOW 84-1 RSF BG New Ordinance KA 536 4/6/2012 Tue 4/24/2012 Rec Ctr If If ✓ 5/15/2012 5/29/2012 LAREDO LANE 75-02 RSF AK New Ordinance BG 537 4/6/2012 Tue 4/24/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ It ✓ 5/15/2012 5/29/2012 OAK PONDS 92-08 R-12 SJ New Ordinance Si 539 4/6/2012 Tue 4/24/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ ✓ ✓ 5/15/2012 5/29/2012 PHEASANT HILL 83-1 RSF AK New Ordinance KA 540 4/6/2012 Tue 4/24/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ It if 5/15/2012 5/29/2012 MISSION HILLS 93-04 R8/BN SJ Amendment Only 547/548 3/5/2012 N/A ✓ ✓ ✓ 6/5/2012 6/25/2012 SARATOGA ADDITION 77-01 R-4 AK New Ordinance BG 549 4/20/2012 Tue 5/8/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ ✓ If 6/5/2012 6/25/2012 SOUTH LOTUS LAKE 85-04 RSF AK New Ordinance SJ 550 4/20/2012 Tue 5/8/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ If if 6/5/2012 6/25/2012 SOUTH LOTUS VILLAS R-12 AK New Ordinance SJ 551 4/20/2012 Tue 5/8/2012 Rec Ctr if If ✓ 6/5/2012 6/25/2012 TRIPLE CROWN 85-02 RSF AK New Ordinance BG S52 4/20/2012 Tue 5/8/2012 Rec Ctr If ✓ If 6/5/2012 6/25/2012 WALNUT GROVE 96-04 RSF, R-4, R-8 BG New Ordinance BG 553 4/20/2012 Tue 5/8/2012 Rec Ctr if ✓ ✓ 6/5/2012 6/25/2012 WESTERN HILLS 79-06 RSF AK New Ordinance KA 554 4/20/2012 Tue 5/8/2012 Rec Ctr it ✓ ✓ 6/5/2012 6/25/2012 WILLOWRIDGE 91-03 RSF AK New Ordinance KA 555 4/20/2012 Tue 5/8/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ ✓ ✓ 6/5/2012 6/25/2012 MEADOWS AT LONGACRES / WOODS 92-04 RSF BG New Ordinance BG 556/557 5/11/2012 Thur 5/31/2012 Chan Lib ✓ ✓ ✓ 6/19/2012 7/23/2012 MINNEWASHTA CREEK 78-03 R-4 S1 New Ordinance SJ 558 5/11/2012 Thur 5/31/2012 Chan Lib ✓ ✓ if 6/19/2012 7/23/2012 RED CEDAR COVE 85-05 RLM AK New Ordinance KA 559 5/11/2012 Thur 5/31/2012 Chan Lib ✓ ✓ ✓ 6/19/2012 7/23/2012 WASHTA SAY COURT R3F -Si New QFdiAaRE2 &I P}A &414944 T-huF c 31,120iP Chan i ih ✓ If It ci�n�/29i2 �i2�i CHANHASSEN HILLS 85-06 RSF BG New Ordinance BG 561 6/1/2012 Thur 6/21/2012 Rec Ctr If ✓ ✓ 7/17/2012 8/13/2012 HIDDEN VALLEY 85-11 R-4 AK New Ordinance S1 568 6/1/2012 Thur 6/21/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ ✓ ✓ 7/17/2012 8/13/2012 NORTH BAY RLM BG New Ordinance BG 563 6/1/2012 Thur 6/21/2012 Rec Ctr If ✓ ✓ 7/17/2012 8/13/2012 SPRINGFIELD ADDITION 93-06 RSF BG New Ordinance BG 565 6/1/2012 Thur 6/21/2012 Rec Ctr If If ✓ 7/17/2012 8/13/2012 AUTUMN RIDGE 93-05 R-8 BG New Ordinance BG 560 6/1/2012 Thur 6/21/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ It ✓ 7/17/2012 8/13/2012 LYNMORE ADDITION 98-01 RSF BG New Ordinance Si 562 6/1/2012 Thur 6/21/2012 Rec Ctr if ✓ ✓ 7/17/2012 8/13/2012 PRESERVE 06-14 Res-Med AK New Ordinance KA 564 6/1/2012 Thur 6/21/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ If It 7/17/2012 8/13/2012 TOWNHOMES AT CREEKSIDE 96-02 R-8 BG New Ordinance BG 566 6/1/2012 Thur 6/21/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ If It 7/17/2012 8/13/2012 TROTTERS RIDGE 93-02 RSF BG New Ordinance KA 567 6/1/2012 Thur 6/21/2012 Rec Ctr If ✓ ✓ 7/17/2012 8/13/2012 SUNNY SLOPE RLM AK Rezone RLM KA 6/15/2012 Tue 7/10/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ ✓ If 8/21/2012 9/10/2012 SUNRISE HILLS 4TH RSF AK Rezone RSF BG 571 6/15/2012 Tue 7/10/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ ✓ ✓ 8/21/2012 9/10/2012 ORCHARD HILLS RSF AK Rezone to RSF KA 570 6/15/2012 Tue 7/10/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ ✓ ✓ 8/21/2012 9/10/2012 WALDRIPS 2ND RSF AK Rezone RSF KA 572 6/15/2012 Tue 7/10/2012 Rec Ctr ✓ ✓ ✓ 8/21/2012 9/10/2012 FOX CHASE 79-04 RSF BG Rezone:RSF BG 569 6/15/2012 Tue 7/10/2012 RecCtr ✓ ✓ ✓ 8/21/2012 9/10/2012 WHITETAIL RIDGE 84-02 87 RSF AK Rezone: RSF 5J 573 6/15/2012 Tue 7/10/2012 Rec ✓ ✓ ✓ 8/21/2012 9/10/2012 G:\PLAN\PUDs\PUD Subdivision List.xls Chanhassen Planning Commission — January 3, 2012 Undestad moved, Hokkanen seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission, as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, approves Planning Case #2012-01 for a 13,191 square foot multiple accessory structure area variance on property zoned Agricultural Estate District as shown in Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions and adoption on the Findings of Fact and Decision: 1. The applicant shall call Gopher One State Call (651) 454-0002 to complete a locate request prior to construction. 2. The shed must meet all setback requirements. 3. A Zoning Permit is required. 4. The accessory structure may not be used for a home occupation as outlined in the Chanhassen City Code and may only be used for agricultural purposes as defined by Minnesota State Statute. 5. The accessory structure may not be used as a separate dwelling unit. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Thomas noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated November 1, 2011 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS: None. CITY COUNCIL UPDATE. Aanenson: Thank you. On Monday, on November 14'" the Nowling variance appeal was, went to the City Council and that was approved. On November 28"the Walmart meeting, City Council meeting Walmart was a conceptual was approved, was denied. Excuse me. Was denied and so the staff did prepare Findings of Fact which were approved on their next meeting. Pioneer Pass Addition was approved, the second phase and that is actually kind of in this area we were just talking about. And then Findings of Fact for the Walmart again was approved by the City Council on December 12'". Aller: Great, thank you. DISCUSS CODE AMENDMENTS: RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS. Thomas: Are we going to adjourn? Aanenson: We're going to keep this on. We're not going to adjourn. Aller: This is discussion prior to adjournment. Thomas: Got it. Aanenson: We decided it would be, it might be, if there's someone watching out there, it might be good information for them. We're going to be holding some neighborhood meetings which Angie will explain here. Kairies: Yes, so we have brought this to you previously in September and then also last June because what we're trying to do at a staff level is find the standards for these planned unit developments that were SCANNED Chanhassen Planning Commission — January 3, 2012 done at the beginning of time and so we're going through and we found that some have been approved with the final development. Some of the standards have been approved with the site plan. Some with the subdivision. Some we can't find at all so we're trying to go through each, not every single lot in the subdivision but to try and get an overall idea of what the standards were. So in doing that we're trying to figure out the best way to handle these planned unit developments and with many of them what we'll do is use our standard or PUD ordinance form that we have today and adopt that with standards so that it will be uniform. Everybody will have the information. We'll be able to communicate that with the residents when they call with they want to do improvements and know what their setback is or their hard surface coverage. Some of them we already have those ordinances in place but we did not put in an underlying zoning district so if that planned unit development is silent on an issue, such as parking or signs, something like that, we need to make sure that that standard is there from the code so we'll say unless otherwise stated in this ordinance the RSF zoning district applies for everything else. And so that could be just an easy amendment for some of the more recent ones. Another thing that we're looking at doing is to see if we can fit some of these PUD's into our standard zoning districts so we have the RLM district which is the low medium density. If the lot areas work out, if the setbacks work out, things like that we can maybe rezone those. So some of them will have more extensive changes or could possibly have more extensive changes than the others so what we would like to do is at a staff level have neighborhood meetings with those property owners. If they're going to be rezoned they're going to want to know what that means to them. How that will affect them. If it's simply just a change to say reference this underlying zoning district we will not have meetings so that's the gist of what we're going to do and then we're going to plan public hearings for those subdivisions as we get through those meetings. Aanenson: I was just going to clarify or maybe iterate what Angie was just saying. So if it's a straight PUD our goal then would be to notify the HOA President or the Board to let them know. If there's more changes are required, some of these older ones there are just anomalies in there that there's no impervious surface requirement or some of them actually allowed some commercial zoning districts in some of the middle of residential so it's our way to try to communicate with all those homeowners. For example even in let's say like Longacres it's just silent on the adoption of the PUD so we'd probably just send it to the association. I don't think there's a need for much communication to resolve any issues but we want to make sure that people understand we're not trying to restrict their property. Make it more onerous but make it clear if they're selling because people are doing title checks on these and it's just a black hole that we're finding on some of these. It's similar to what we did on the industrial but then you had one owner. Now we've got a lot of owners so Angie's going to kind of show you what the, where they are and kind of how they break down but our goal is to meet with them before they come here for the public hearing so we've kind of done a lot of that, just explaining it so we're not having that dialogue in that meeting and some of them may take a few meetings to get through and explain it all so we're, this has been Angie's big project this last year to try and figure out a way to break it into sizeable pieces for us to manage and for you to manage as we go through these so. Aller: Great Kairies: So here's a breakdown of what we have so far. There are three that have been struck out and that's because they're already done. You might remember the Ches Mar Farm when was that, last year. And so we kind of took care of that one at that time and so we're going to do similar with the rest of these. So just to give you kind of an idea of where we're located, this isn't all of them. Like the Lake Susan Hills, because that one's done I didn't indicate it but these are, they're just throughout the city and we just want to make sure that we're able to communicate with the property owners when they have questions. Aanenson: And again the PUD's we've done in the recent past are all correct so these are going back to probably the early 90's. Chanhassen Planning Commission — January 3, 2012 Kairies: Oh, early 70's. Aanenson: Yeah I mean I'm sorry, as more recent as probably 90 past we've been doing correctly. Kairies: Right, right. Aanenson: So these would go way back from the early 70's and again just people that are trying to sell their property want to know, or even people that want to add on. What are my setbacks and it's just like Angie said, sometimes they're in a development contract and some of those things expire. Some of them have longer terms so that's what we want to make sure there's no ambiguity on those. Ellsworth: Angie, could you go back to the list? Kairies: Sure. Ellsworth: Isn't like Liberty on Bluff Creek, isn't that fairly new? Aanenson: That one is. Kairies: Yes, so that one could probably be struck out. Aanenson: We haven't finished redoing that one. That one's on Kate's. Kairies: And that's just going through to make sure that it has that line in there that says. Aanenson: So we put them all on the list. Kairies: ... district. Aller: I think it's a great project and I think you should be applauded for doing it in the first place. Thomas: It's a lot of work. Aller: It's a lot of work but secondly and more importantly the fact that you're going out to the community and receiving the input so that they understand it fully. Are aware of what we're trying to do and it's, that probably is nothing more frustrating than having to try to find out that they can't use their property in a certain way without taking action or without coming before us because it hasn't been addressed and these are exactly those properties that are going to be turning over or that need work done because of the older properties so I think it's a great project. Aanenson: I think too it's an opportunity for us, the planning staff to go out and meet with the neighbors and see what other issues they may have so it's a good opportunity. Like you say it's some of the older neighborhoods and see what they may have some other issues that we can communicate back to you and to the City Council also. Allen. Great. And so we'll be setting an agenda for those in groups? Aanenson: Yep. Chanhassen Planning Commission — January 3, 2012 Kairies: Yes. We've gotten, so far we've gotten a list and most of them researched but we still have quite a few holes so. Aller: So individuals can look to the website if they want to see when these are on the agenda? Kairies: Yes. Aanenson: We're probably also, that's why we wanted to put it out here public, we're thinking of ways that we communicate this too that we can put those out on our website and we're looking at ways that people can do their own research of why am I going through this and why is my neighborhood selected and try to do a good communication, kind of marketing on that too. Aller: Anything further from anyone? Do we have a motion to adjourn? Thomas moved, Hokkanen seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nano Opheim 7 • • T MEMORANDUM CITY OF TO: Planning Commission CIllIl1HMSC11 FROM: Planning Staff 7700 Market Boulevard DATE: January 3, 2012 PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJ: Planned Unit Developments — Residential Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 ISSUE Fax:952.227.1110 Many of the Residential PUDs have unknown development standards, i.e. setbacks, Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.11R0 hard surface coverage limitations, lot size, etc. It is important that the city, Fax: 952.227.1190 homeowners or potential homeowners have knowledge of these standards. The standards have been adopted or implemented in the following mechanisms: Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 . Approval of a Final Development Plan, the specific standards may or may not Fax:952.227.1170 have been stated. Rnance a PUD Agreement/Development Contract as part of a Subdivison. Phone:952.227.1140 • For multi -family, via a Site Plan Agreement. Fax:952.227.1110 • Within the PUD rezoning ordinance the standards were codified. • During the 1970's, any Residential Single -Family development exceeding 25 Park & Recreation lots was required to be processed as a Planned Residential Development. It is Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax:952.2271110 possible that some of these developments could be rezoned to Residential Single -Family. Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Staff is working toward developing standards for those PUDs based on their current Phone: 952.2271400 conditions, and/or find the most applicable underlying zoning districts. Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Staff has brought this issue to the Planning Commission on September 6, 2011 and Fax:952.2271110 June 21, 2011. Public Works DISCUSSION 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227,1300 Staff has provided a table of the approximately 50 Residential Planned Unit Fax:952.227,1310 Developments (PUDR) to evaluate each development to determine which of the Senior Center following options will be most appropriate: Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax:952.227.1110 1. Adopt the PUD ordinance with the current standards. Web Site 2. Amend the existing PUD to reference the underlying zoning district. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 3. Determine if there is a more fitting standard zoning district. SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community for Lite - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Planning Commission • • Residential Planned Unit Developments January 3, 2012 Page 2 Based on the best option for each development, staff is proposing to conduct neighborhood meetings for those developments that will have the most significant zoning change. Those that will merely be amended to reference the underlying zoning district will not have a neighborhood meeting. Following the neighborhood meetings, public hearings will be scheduled. It is staffs intent to group similar PUD corrections for the various developments for public hearings. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Update dated September 6, 2011. 2. Issue Paper dated June 21, 2011. 3. Table of Residential Planned Unit Developments. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Fax:952.227.1110 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Planning Commission Planning Staff September 6, 2011 C41�- AU Planned Unit Developments — Residential BACKGROUND On June 21, 2011, staff presented an Issue Paper regarding the approximately 50 Building Inspections Phone:952.2271130 Residential Planned Unit Developments (PUDR) throughout the City and the need to Fax:952.227.1190 evaluate these developments to: Engineering i . Identify the most fitting underlying zoning district. Phone:952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 2. Reference the City Code when the PUD is silent, i.e. parking requirements, home occupations, etc. Finance Phone: 952.2271140 3. Determine if there is a more fitting zoning district without creating Fax: 952.2271110 nonconformities or other site issues; such as increasing hard surface coverage Park 8 Recreation limitations and how that affects stormwater pond capacity. Phone:952.227.1120 Fax: 952.22T1110 4. Adopt a form ordinance to provide consistency with PUD Design Standards. Recreation Center 5. Develop standards and adopt ordinances when needed. 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 6. Schedule PUD ordinance amendments for Public Hearing. Fax: 952.227.1404 UPDATE Planning a Natural Resources Phone:952.227.1130 Staff is conducting an in-depth research of each development to determine the most Fax:952.227.1110 appropriate course of action. Staff has discovered the following after researching the different ordinances: Public Works 7901 Park Place . The more recent ordinances reference the underlying zoning districts; Phone: 952.227.1300 however, they may omit language that states "except as modified herein". Fax:952.227.1310 Senior Center • The PUD subdivisions created in the 1980's and early 1990's reference the Phone: 952.227.1125 Design Standards as part of the Development Contract, rather than with the Fax: 952.227.1110 adoption of the Design Standards or PUD Ordinance. Web Site . Prior to 1980 no design standards or develop contracts exist. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Planning Commission 0 • Residential Planned Unit Developments September 6, 2011 Page 2 Staff is working to develop a systematic way of grouping the PUD ordinance amendments for Public Hearing, i.e. sections of the city, similar underlying zoning districts, most recent to older developments, etc. However, as staff continues to research each PUD, locating the specific design standards has proven to be complex. Staff will continue to research and determine a common grouping in order to present the PUD amendments for public hearing. ATTACHMENTS 1. Issue Paper dated June 21, 2011. 2. List of Residential Planned Unit Developments. GAPLAN\City CadcUme PaperlPUD's\PUD Residential amendtrxmts Issue Paper Update 9-6-11 Am CITY OF CAMI9ASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952,227.1100 Fax:952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone:952,227.1180 Fax:952.227.1190 Engineering Phone:952.227.1160 Fax:952.22T1170 Finance Phone:952.227.1140 Fax:952.2271110 Park & Recreation Phone:952,227.1120 Fax 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 Fax:952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone:952.227.1130 Fax:952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone:952.2271300 Fax:952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Fax:952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 0 0 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Angie Kairies, Planner I DATE: June 21, 2011 SUBJ: Planned Unit Developments — Residential BACKGROUND In 2009, the City amended the commercial Planned Unit Development, PUD design standards to reference the City Code when the PUD is silent. Staff is proposing an ordinance amendment governing residential Planned Unit Developments to reference the City Code. ANALYSIS Each of these sites has specific ordinances that govern it; however, there are instances when the PUD is silent on certain requirements such as home occupations, driveway design standards, etc. In such instances, the City Code must be referenced to govern these sites. Staff found a number of PUDs that do not reference the City Code. Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Planning Commission Planned Unit Developments Residential June 21, 2011 Page 2 Also, a number of these residential PUD's are older developments and the city code has been amended to include additional zoning districts, such as the Residential Low and Medium Density, RLM. Staff is proposing to evaluate these ordinances to determine if there is a more fitting zoning district. In such instances, staff will present a proposal to rezone those properties. Staff will present PUD ordinance amendments beginning with more recent developments, as the amendment will be straightforward and reference the city code. The earlier developments are more complex and will require greater evaluation to determine the extent of the amendment and possible rezoning. Some of the older developments have uses listed that are out of date and will require updating, such as commercial uses within a residential district. RECOMMENDATION The amendments will appear before the Planning Commission in groups based on agenda availability. Depending on the evaluation of the PUD's, there are approximately 45 potential amendments. G:NPI.AN\City CodeUssue Paper\PUUs\PUD Residential amendments Issue Paper.doc i 171 RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS ARBORETUM VILLAGE AUTUMN RIDGE CHANHASSEN GATEWAY NORTH CHANHASSEN HILLS CHANHASSEN VISTA CHAPARRAL CHES MAR FARM CHESTNUT RIDGE AT NEAR MOUNTAIN CITY CENTER PARK/SARATOGA ADDITION FOX CHASE FOX HOLLOW HIDDEN VALLEY HIGHLANDS AT BLUFF CREEK HISCOX LAKE SUSAN HILLS WEST LAKESIDE LAREDO LANE LIBERTY ON BLUFF CREEK LYNMORE ADDITION MEADOWS AT LONGACRES MINNEWASHTA CREEK MISSION HILLS NEAR MOUNTAIN NORTH BAY OAKPONDS ORCHARD HILLS PHEASANT HILL PRAIRIE CREEK PRESERVE RED CEDAR COVE SARATOGA ADDITION SONG ADDITON/LONGACRES SOUTH LOTUS LAKE SOUTH LOTUS VILLAS SPRINGFIELD ADDITION SUNNY SLOPE SUNRISE HILLS 4TH TOWNHOMES AT CREEKSIDE TRIPLE CROWN TROTTERS RIDGE WALDRIPS 2ND WALNUT GROVE WASHTA BAY COURT WESTERN HILLS WHITETAIL RIDGE WILLOWRIDGE WOODS AT LONGACRES