The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-05_LIFESTYLE CENTER - NW CORNER OF LYMAN & POWERS BLVDS. FILE 2 OF 2 AUAR UPDATEHoisington Koeglcr Group inc. 123 North 3rd Street, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55401-1659 Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 March 09, 2015 Invoice No: 014-056 -1 Project 014-056 Chanhassen AUAR Update 2014 Pro_fession_al_Se_rvices from November 01_20_14_to_February _28_2015_ Task 01 Update Development Scenario • Coordination with Kate re: scheduling and process • Internal team discussion on project • Meeting with Kate and Todd on 2127 • Project coordination with Kate and internal team • Review submittal information and comment on Lifestyle Center typologies Professional Personnel Principal Hades, Bryan Scheib, Bradley Professional11 Miller, Jeffrey Totals Total Labor Hours Rate Amount .75 155.00 7.25 175.00 .75 100.00 8.75 116.25 1,268.75 75.00 1,460.00 1,460.00 Total this Task $1,460.00 ------------------------------------------- Task 99 Project Expenses Reimbursable Expenses Mileage and Travel Expense 2/27/2015 Scheib, Bradley Meeting with Staff on 2/27 14.00 Total Reimbursables 14.00 14.00 Total this Task Billing Limits Current Prior To -Date Total Billings 1,474.00 0.00 1,474.00 Limit 30,000.00 Remaining 2B,526.00 Total this Invoice E14.00 $1,474.00 i0y The Grocery Business Is Now Retail's Hottest Niche Page 1 of 6 GLOBAL Successfully Navigating MATTERS Opportunities and Challenges in Global Business Speatwr 5eris Glenn Leitch TwinCifies BUSINFCc April 15, 2015 REGISTER HERE NEWS LEADERSHIP INDUSTRIES LISTS+RESEARCH Uominate a innesotaamilyusinessoday Home E-newsletters Sabscnbe Alooal us Fallow us ® © youal =x OPINION LIFE STYLE HONORS + EVENTS MAGAZINE HIGHLIGHTS The Business Of Dying Is Changing March's Top Networking Spots I Is Residential Red Estate Good Business Again? A Network For Femole Entrepreneurs 6 Why The Grocery Business Is Now Retail's Hottest Niche Why does everyone want a seat at the low -margin grocery table? by Bud Gityard January 20, 2015 Kowalski's leaders, from left: Mike Ouse, vice president of operations; Deb Kowahki, administrative director: Mary Anne Kowahki, co- founder, Kris Kowahki Christiansen, COO; Boyd Case, director of meat and seafood; Terri Bends, vice president of perishables. Woodbury may seem like a typical suburb with the usual share of coffee shops, retail outlets and grocery stores. But the east metro enclave is one of the emerging battlegrounds in the intensifying store wars between grocery retailers in the Twin Cities. From the windows of Kowalski's Markets headquarters, chief operating officer Kris Kowalski Christiansen overlooks Radio Drive, one of Woodbury's main arteries. A couple of miles up the mad, a new Whole Foods Market is slated to open in the spring of 2o17. Two miles to the south, a Jerry's Foods will open this spring. Just about every player in the industry is, or soon will be, in the city. 'Trader Joe's is already here. We're here, Byerly's is down the road: rrhey] took over the old Rainbow site," she says from her office above Kowalski's gg,000-square-foot store. "I don't know that there s a current grocer in the market that's not looking or working on a site; says Deb Carlson, a veteran commercial retail real estate broker with Bloomington -based Cushman & Wakefield/NorthMant. Phil Lombardo, chief marketing and merchandising officer for Lunds/Byerlys, estimates that there has been a So percent increase in local retail space dedicated to selling groceries over the last to years. His tally includes the burgeoning grocery square footage at Target and Wall -Mart. "We added six stores last year," he say%, "that's significant growth for us' Meanwhile, grocers across the Twin Cities are bracing for the arrival of Hy-Vee, which boasts annual sales topping $8.7 billion. The company, based in West Des Moines, Iowa, operates 235 stows in eight Midwestern states, including 17 in southern Minnesota. At the end of GLOBAL MATTERS Speaker Series Successfully Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Global Business April 15, 2015 3,3o-&00 p.m. a $35 �T Presentation, reception, and networking fi4rn lrtacB Current Issue Read this month's e of Twin Cities __siness. Dgra E6aon sporwred by can eras h /Y�Ya http://tcbmag.com/Industries/Retail-and-Hospitality/Why-The-Grocery-Business-Is-Now-Retail-s-... 3/10/2015 *hY The Grocery Business Is Now Retail's Hottest Niche Page 2 of 6 su.cea.fufly Nor ii r inp Oppwtunilies a,d Chan«,qe. is GLOBAL MATTERSApril 2015 20u4, Hy-Vee was on track to open in New Hope and Oakdale in the second half of 20155 and Lakeville in 2016. "Our proposed expansion into the Twin Cities would add several stores over the next several years. There are more new store projects in various stages of research and development,' says Hy-Vee spokeswoman Tam Deering -Hansen via email. The company won't reseal how many stores it plans to open in the Irvin Cities. Speak , Ser,es ainatco N[as In addition, several smaller players are looking to pitch a tent here. Fresh Thyme Farmers Market, based in the Chicago suburbs, is set to open its first Twin Cities store in Bloomington this coming fall and is scouting more locations. Other chains, including Boulder, Colo. -based LuclVs Market and Fletcher, N.C: based Earth Fare, sre also looking for locations here. Hometown co-op grocers are expanding as well. Eden Prairie -based Lakewinds Food Co-op opened its third location in 2014, in Richfield. Carlson, who represents Lakewinds, is already looking for a site for a fourth location. Kowalski's is flexing its own muscles. A new 17,coo-square-font Kowalski's store opens in Excelsior in June, its first in the affluent western suburbs. The store will feature concepts new to the company —made -to -order pasta and restaurant -style sushi. It's Kowalski's loth location and its first since Eagan in 2008. Kowalski Christiansen says that the company is scooting other sites west of the Mississippi. Experts naturally anticipate an eventual saturation point. "There are going to be some ]opera in this battle," Carlson says, "there just has to be." But for now, it's an all-out food fight. A looming grocery glut? Three factors appear to be fueling the recent feeding frenzy: First is that the region had a slight shortage of stores compared with national averages. "You look at where we were even five, six years [ago], and our market had fewer grocers than just about any market in the country," says Sam Martin, a retail broker with the local office of Colliers International. "I think maybe we're playing catch-up rather than going overboard." The most recent statistics from the Metropolitan Council show that the Minneapolis -St. Paul area grew by 3.6 percent between the 2010 census and 2013, adding more than ioi,000 people in just three years to boost the population of the core seven -county metro area to 2.95 million. But stoles are opening at a much faster clip. Lunds/ByerVs counted 7.9 million square feet of grocery retail space across the Twin Cities in 2002; that number had climbed to 11.9 million square feet in 2013. Still, some major Twin Cities suburbs are without grocery stores despite high population densities. New Hope officials, for example, are excited to Coborn's ... delivers be getting a Hy-Vee store later this year. St Cloud -based Coborn's Second is a national trend for shoppers to spread their loyalty around. In Inc is one of the largest 2014, 9 percent of shoppers indicated they had no single regular grocery Minnesota -based grocery retailers, with 12o food, stom—tiiple that of recent years, according to the Food Marketing gas, convenience and liquor Instimte's (FMI) 2o14 Gros Shopper Trends Grocery ppe Report. The trend is driven stores (8o ta Minnesota), by changing shopping patterns of millennials. with revenue of $r.3 billion "What appears to be driving these shifts is the dynamic of diversification; to $14 billion in 2014. Its shoppers are becoming less likely to choose any one store to satisfy all their market focus is mainly needs," says the report. "Shoppers are optimizing their satisfaction store by rural and small towns, but store and department by department." it operates stores as close to The third factor is a convergence of demographic, employment, housing the metro as Elk River, Hastings and Buffalo. and values changes in recent years. The result Despite ever -busier Coborn's main Twin Cities lifestyles, more grocery shoppers purchase what they need for the day, or presence is through its the next day, instead of for a week or two at a time. Theyvre also looking for CobernisDelivers grocer, more perishable fresh produce and healthy pre -made foods they can buy delivery service. and eat on location. "Consumers still talk fondly about once -sacred rules and rituals —three distinct meals a day, the family dinner, etc —but modern eating culture has changed these rules," says FMI. "In today's eating culture, the only thing that is certain is that eating out happen anywhere, everywhere and anytime." One trip to the grocery store says a lot about the way the once -staid business is changing. As diets shift stores am ramping up organic and natural food options. Food is a staple for even one, bra good food often feels like one of life's small, affordable luxuries. "Half the grocery shoppers [think] it's a convenience factor," says Kowalski Christiansen, "and I think half are driven by products, quality and service." Salad days: Carving out a niche In some ways, Kowalski's timed things just light: Its approach seems to perfectly fit the growing percentage of shoppers who want smaller -format stores offering high -quality fresh produce, meat and ready -to -eat products. Working through Hardships;_ in the Family Business April iQ r this r" a.m. .sion and Join us (m this brnkfast discussion and develop tools to help your I family business succeed. 0 UN IV E 0.51TY 4 STTHOMA% IIaEl Guar Women's Health Leadership TRUST 2015 Forum Tuesday, April 21, 2015 TW Most Popular Innovative Office Solutions Bros S&T Office Products Will layoffs Be Part Of Target's Cost -Cutting Strategy? Malting Waves In Radio Granite City Food & Brewery For Sale Changes In Store For Target's Grocery Business http://tcbmag.com/Industries/Retail-and-Hospitality/Why-The-Grocery-Business-Is-Now-Retail-s-... 3/ 10/2015 i0ly The Grocery Business Is Now Retail's Hottest Niche Page 3 of 6 When Jim and Mary Anne Kowalski started Kowalski's in 1983, their vision was simply `to make our mortgage Payment and get Kris through college. That really was it," says Mary Anne matter-of-factly. (Jim Kowalski died in an accident in 2013.) At the time they had a single store on Grand Avenue in St. Paul and no big plans for growth. Three decades ago, she says, they saw little maneuvering room among traditional grocery stores, but little competition among upscale grocers (a niche dominated by Byerly's and Byerly's alone). "The only plan we ever made was to transition from a conventional to an upscale market. That was a strategic move," she says, in part because they knew Wal-Mart would soon be entering the market. Since then, other big -box stores with groceries have expanded throughout the Twin Cities, including Sam's Club and Costm. As the }ears passed, other retailers started selling groceries, including home improvement chain Menards, Target, Holiday gas stations and pharmacy retailers Walgreens and CVS. Back in the 198os consumers bought groceries at a grocer; today, basic selections of packaged food, beverages, and grab -and -go hot snacks and sandwiches are just about everywhere. While groceries have typically been a low -margin business that worked on high sales volumes, it continues to be an attractive sector for companies such as Target and Wal-Mart. According to Wal-Mart's annual report, 56 percent of the company�s sales are groceries. For Target, food and pet supplies amount to 21 percent of U.S. sales, which translates into nearly $r,5 billion in sales in FY2or3; Target sells more groceries than the $14.2 billion sold in FY2oi4 at Whole Foods. While everyone theoretically competes with everyone, not all retailers are chasing the same customer. Big -box players offer shoppers a value proposition, while hoping to sell them other higher -margin goods in the process such as medications or bedding. Stores like Whole Foods, Kowalski's, Lunds and Byerly's cater to an upscale customer with a foodie sensibility. A chain such as Aldi competes with rock -bottom prices. Hy-Vee differentiates by operating stores that are larger than a typical Cub Foods. Within its go,000-square- foot format it aims to feel like a Lunds store but offer prices more on par with Cub, based on what Hy-Vee officials told New Hope city officials when announcing plans there. Somewhere over the Rainbow But how much depth does the market have? Might the Twin Cities already be reaching a saturation point for grocery retailers? Last fail, Hy-Vee and local developer Opus Development Co. dropped plans for a store in Maple Grove after city staffers expressed concern about the number of grocery stores already in the area. Last May, Milwaukee -based Roundy's Inc. announced it was pulling out of the Twin Cities, selling 18 Rainbow stores for $65 million and closing its nine other locations. Roundy's statement was blunt: "The economic downturn over the last few years, coupled with an increased competitive footprint in the Minneapolis/St. Paul market, has made it difficult for Roundy's to keep the Rainbow banner competitive." The Grocer list �... T rR83 S.00a Coops 16 No rotas oeroox 75 n eoaeo Itr- 3 (0b 236 WOOD Jrry's 21 Q 60.000 xowaYti's a a 20.000-5a.00m WtivByeija 26 26 2¢,OOp-00,00p Tnea n 1801 1MOCX`95.000 Batle .. r 401 11.00614.00a Wel-x 84 42e3 191.eeo Waobraa6 rlrb a 369 20A00.60.000 The question is whether Rainbow's troubles were a sign of such saturation or merely an opportunity for other retailers to grab market share. "I cant speculate when the saturation point is going to hit," says Kowalski Christiansen. Rypicalty if it's oversaturated, someone shakes out." Cub Foods is hardly sitting still, completing 13 store remodels and acquiring ro Rainbows in 2014. Cub is also planning a new store in White Bear lake. Veteran industry analyst Todd Hale, formerly senior vice president of Consumer and Shopper Insight for New York -based Nielsen, says growth potential exists for retailers catering to the upper and lower ends of the market. Traditional middle -market grocers —the landscape where Rainbow fought and lost in the twin Cities —are finding it a tougher go. "About 70 percent of the expansion that we've seen from supermarkets in the last eight years or so has come from niche [retailers]," says Hale, now an independent consultant. He sees that growth divided between "natural gourmet" players like Whole Foods Market and "limited assortment/deep discount" retailers such as Aldi at the other end of the spectrum. "It's the extremes, I think, where we're seeing the winners." Retail broker John Johanson, senior vice president with the local office of Colliers International, isn't losing sleep about the influx of new grocers. In his read of the market, Rainbow simply lost the war to Cub, so it picked up its carts and left town. The consumer votes by where they spend their dollars and they're telling you constantly what they want" says Johanson. "It's not an easy market." But Julannso0 says that competition among grocers means that the average consumer has many more options than they did 20 years ago. He expects Hy-Vee to carve out its own corner of the market. "I think they're really good and I think they ll fad their niche; Johanson says. `The grocery market has never ceased to amaze me. There's something for everybody, that's the way I look at it" http://tcbmag.com/Industries/Retail-and-Hospitality/Why-The-Grocery-Business-Is-Now-Retail-s-... 3/10/2015 khy The Grocery Business Is Now Retail's Hottest Niche Page 4 of 6 Never Mind Hy-Vee: Grocery Veteran opens New Independent There seems to be little room left in the market for a small, independent grocer. But Joel Ahlstnom isn't discouraged: He opened Longfellow Market on East lake Street in south Minneapolis in 2014. Ahistrom, 70, has been in the grocery business for a were 53 years and also operates Riverside Market in Isanti. He says that business is improving, but acknowledges he's already changed his business model from a conventional grocery store to that of a natural and organic retailer. 'hat's what the neighborhood is looking for,' Ahlsnom says. 'I've had this thing in the works for years. It's kind of a dream to do a store and do it right. I want to m-create the old-fashioned neighborhood grocery store. That was my goal.' Ahtstrom says he isn't worried about the big dogs taking a bite out of business at his 18,000-square-foot store. —Phis is not a Hy-Vee neighborhood It just has a nice feel to it, it's a more friendly place; Ahlstrom says. 'A lot of my shoppers would never darken the door of a Cub or a Wal-Mart.' Who's who in the Grocery Business Kowalski'' Markets Woodbury -based Kowalski's Excelsior store will be its loth. Christiansen says revenue for 2014 will end Up at $200 million to $250 million. holds/ByerWs Edina -based Lund Food Holdings Inc. operates 28local stores: 13 Lunds locations, 13 Byedys stores, one Rainbow (Plymouth) and Lunds & Byerly s Kitchen in Wayzata. Jerry's Enterprises The privately held Edina -based Jerry�s Enterprises operates two local Jenyvs Foods in Edina and Eden Prairie, with a third soon to open in Woodbury. Jerry's also is a large Cub Foods franchisee Cub Foods Eden Prairie -based Supervalu Inc. owns Cub Foods, which has 66 corporately owned and franchised locations in the Twin Cities. Supervalu paid approximately $35 million to acquire in former Rainbow stores, which became to new Cub locations. Whole Foods Fortune Soo retailer Whole Foods Market Inc., based in Austin, Texas, will grow to seven metro locations when it opens its Woodbury store in 2017. Aldi Deep -discount chain Aldi, based in Batavia, Ill., opened its first local store in Inver Grove Heights in 2003 and now has 25 across the metro. Trader Joe's Boutique grocer Trader Joe's, based in Monrovia, Calif., opened its first local outpost in 2006 in St. Louis Park and now has seven metro stores. Roundy's Roundy+s Inc., a $4 billion gmcer based in Milwaukee, announced in May 2014 that it was selling r8 Rainbow stores in the Twin Cities for $65 million. It's still trying to land subleases for nine closed stores. Orange You Glad You're In Edina? The region surrounding Southdale is ground-wro for the grocery expansion wars. These are the combatants: 1. Kowalski'$ Market 5327 Lyndale Ave. S. Minneapolis 2. Aldi 6310 Penn Ave. S. Richfield 3. Lunds 6228 Penn Ave. S. Richfield 4. Cub Foods 6775 York Ave. S. Edina 5• SaperTarget 700o York Ave. S. Edina 6. Byerly's 7171 France Ave. S. Edina New store opened September 2014 http:/hcbmag.com/Industries/Retail-and-Hospitality/Why-The-Grocery-Business-Is-Now-Retail-s-... 3/10/2015 NUy The Grocery Business Is Now Retail's Hottest Niche Page 5 of 6 7• Whole Foods Market Igor France Ave. S. Edina OpenedAprf12012 8. Trader Joe's' 4270 W. 78th St., Bloomington Opened October 2o12 9. Target 2555 W. 79th St. Bloomington to. Fresh Thyme Farmers Market 8001 Penn Ave. S. Bloomington Slated to Open faB2olg i1. Cub Foods 8421 Lyndale Alm. S. Bloomington 12. Sant's Club Zoo American Blvd. W. Bloomington 13. Wal-Mart 700 American Blvd. E. Bloomington 14. Lakewinds Food Co-op 642o Lyndale Ave. S. Richfield Opened June 2o1q •New stores Burl Gilya d is senior writer for 7rB. Bock To Top _.Like what you just read? To receive business news directly in your inbox each Tuesday and Thursday, sign up for our free e-newsletter, Briefcase, and be sure to join the conversation -� by commenting below. A! 0 comments Comments Twin Cities Business Community Login - PRecommend [A -Share Sort by Best - Start the discussion... SIGN IN WITH ID O e OR REGISTER WITH DLSOUS M Disqus is a conversation network Disqus never moderates or censors. The rules on this community are its own. Your email is safe with us. It's only used for modehdI0nand optianat notifications. Don't be a jerk Or do anything illegal Everything is �aserttratway.-. - Read full terms and conditions Be the first to comment. Nothing for you here ... yet. But as you comment with Disqus and follow other Disqus users, you will start fn rerPmvR nnfifirnfinnc here as wRll as a no..monall)ed feed of activity by vnu and the comments powered by Disqus http://tcbmag.com/Industries/Retail-and-Hospitality/Why-The-Grocery-Business-Is-Now-Retail-s-... 3/10/2015 C mvk kip U v +� y d .2 y 1 1 � i Id V12 ov �P-/ �� 1S 6 D ?D all c;W 4o T(% f }� D 4o IaIA 1 i FOCAL--, / l/v I Vw • � - I - -J uu 1 t PA46J . * A_i CITY OF MEMORANDUM CIIA NSEN TO: Mayor and City Council 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 FROM: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Chanhassen, MN 55317 DATE: April 27, 2015 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 SUBJ: Discuss Visioning Process for the Lifestyle Center Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections To help develop a vision for The Quadrant, the Mayor suggested that City Council Phone:952.227.1180 Fax:952.227.1190 members come to the work session with thoughts, goals and ideas for the project. Attached is a Charge Statement and Visioning Outline that you can use as a tool to Engineering gather outcomes and goals for the project. Phone:952.227.1160 Fax:952.227.1170 On Monday night we will have a brainstorming session to complete the Charge Finance Statement and then discuss next steps in the process. Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax:952.2271110 ATTACHMENTS Park & Recreation I. Charge Statement PFax:952.227.1110 2. Project Kick -Off Meeting and Schedule Fax: 952.227.1110 3. Memo from Kate Aanenson dated April 13, 2015 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 9Aadmin\tg\1ifesty1e cmterWisioning memo 4-27-15.dmx Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow i Charge Statement Goal e, l What is the purpose of the group (Stakeholders)? Results Desired �Yv Product/Outcomes expected f from the group (Stakeholders). (JV/1 Lt6�'eat Scope of Responsibility & Level of Authority Who does the group (Stakeholders) report to? Timeline When is the project due? Next meeting date. Resources Available What other expertise is available & who are those resources? Communication What strategies would you like to be used to communicate? Expectations for Membership/Stakeholders Names and numbers of those present, member responsibilities. Iq #acAmezi { a 16 Project Kick-off Meeting Tuesday, April 14, 201S 1:00 — 2:30 pm Chanhassen City Hall Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Project Introductions • Background • Current Development Status • Desired Outcomes 3. Project Scope and Stakeholders 4. Project Schedule S. Stakeholder Engagement Techniques City of Chanhassen Quadrant Visioning Study Stakeholder Engagement Technique • Property Owners Individual or Joint Meeting • Neighborhood Residents Evening Meeting, Instant Poll and Survey • Broader Community Project website and Survey • Chamber of Commerce/Business Breakfast Meeting, Instant Poll and Survey Community • Elected and Appointed Officials Joint Work Session • City Staff Three (3) Meetings over course of project 6. What Defines "Vision"? 7. How is Vision Enforced? 8. Project Logistics • Land Use Concepts to be Shared with Public • Stakeholder Invitations • Website Hosting 9. Next Steps City of Chanhassen Quadrant Visioning Study Sample Meeting Agenda Date Time (Length?) Location Agenda 1. Review Meeting Agenda 2. Project Introduction • Project Tasks and Schedule • Desired Project Outcomes • Desired Meeting Outcome 3. Site Orientation • Location and Existing Features • Current Land Use • Guided Land Use • Land Uses/Development Concept under Consideration 4. Land Use Discussion • Issues and Opportunities with Land Uses/Development Concepts S. Visioning Introduction • Survey 6. Next Steps/Adjorn City of Chanhassen Quadrant Visioning Study What Defines "Vision"? • Land Use • Circulation o Traffic o Pedestrian o Bicycle • Parking • Edge Conditions • Density • Public Uses/Spaces/Programming • Aesthetics o Building Form and Materials o Landscaping o Signage: Location, Form/Size, and Materials • What is Missing? Quadrant Visioning Study Project Schedule April 14, 2015 (Draft) 1. Joint Work Session (5/11/15) 2. Project Kick-off Meeting • 3. Project Website and Survey Complete • 4. Survey Open to Public 5. Property Owner Meeting(s) 6. Neighborhood Meeting • 7. Chamber of Commerce Meeting 8. Summary Memorandum 9. City Staff Meetings O O it p MEMORANDUM C�rp l l l OF TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager MMSENFROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director 7700 Market Boulevard DATE: A 2015 c� `, �� Ps Box N April 13, �` C]�(/ Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJ: Discuss Visioning Process for the Lifestyle Center Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax:952.2271110 As a part of the conceptual review of the Level 7 Development plan on March 9, 2015, the City Council directed staff to work on developing a Visioning Study for the Building Inspections Lifestyle Center property. Staff has consulted with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. to Phone: 952.227.1180 prepare a Professional Services Agreement. As outlined by Barry Warner in the Fax:952.227.1190 attached proposal, the visioning process is intended to inform the elected and Engineering appointed officials along with the city staff, of the values and priorities presented to Phone:952.227.1160 the various stakeholders. Fax: 952.227.1170 The focus of the study will on the following: Finance Phone: 952,227.1140 • Composition of development uses Fax: 952,227.1110 0 Circulation including vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles Park A Recreation • Edge treatment and landscaping Phone:952.227.1120 • Programmable civic area and amenities Fax: 952.227.1110 . Development character, scale and aesthetics Center 310 Coulter 2310CoulterBoulevard Mr. Weser has outlined the suggested 3-4 month process and the stakeholder � Phone:952.227.1400 meetings. A web -based survey will also be a component of the visioning process. Fax: 952.227.1404 His proposal includes a budget of $30,000. Planning & Mr. Warner will be at the work session to answer any questions that the Council may Natural Resources Phone:952.2271130 have regarding the proposal. Staff recommends placing the Professional Services Fax:952.227.1110 Agreement on the next City Council agenda for approval. Public Works ATTACHMENTS 7901 Park Place P5P.200 Fax:952.22T1310 1. SU Consulting Group, Inc. Visioning Study Proposal dated March 30, 2015. Senior Center g �ptan\2015 planning c \2015-05 lifestyle =ter\vision pr m\cc work session 4-13.docx Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax:952.227.1110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Life -Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow INN E it S DESIGNERS Consulting Group, Inc. March 30, 2015 DRAFT For REVIEW Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR A VISIONING STUDY Based on your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional services for conducting a visioning study in association with the Quadrant and the adjacent parcels. For purposes of this letter, the "Quadrant' will refer to the contiguous 118 acres currently owned by several private parties. Study Background and Intent A 118 acre tract of undeveloped land is located in the City of Chanhassen near Lyman and Powers Boulevards near TH 212. The area is owned by several private parties with development designated for mixed land uses including a retail center. Although general land use designations have been suggested, formal approvals for development have not been obtained from the City of Chanhassen. The visioning exercise and outcome is intended to inform elected policy makers and appointed officials along with city staff as to the values and priorities presented by the diverse stakeholder groups who have interest in future development of the Quadrant. Visioning for the purpose of this exercise, is intended to focus upon several topics to include; • Composition of development uses • Circulation including vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle • Open space functions • Edge treatments and landscaping • Programmable civic areas and amenities • Development character, scale and aesthetics Input garnered from the various interested parties will be used to inform the Quadrant and related development projects during their municipal approvals. Approach Meaningful facilitation of the representative stakeholder groups will be paramount to achieve the study intent. To that end, meetings or other means will occur with individual groups to seek input from those individuals who have shown interest or are thought to present valuable perspectives for the proposed development. www.srfconsulting.com One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 ( Minneapolis, MN 554474443 1 763.475A010 Fax: 763.4751429 An Equal Opportunity Employer - 2 - March 30, 2015 Each of the meetings, work sessions or active surveys will employ precedent project images that Portray alternative approaches to related project elements. This technique will allow participants to compare and contrast how varying built projects responded to similar project elements. Participants will be asked to provide preference or priority for the images, and when possible, to provide subjective comments as to suggested changes or improvements that may benefit the Chanhassen application. Identified stakeholder groups and their engagement follow; Current development parcel property owners -one to two facilitated meetings dependent upon their willingness to participate together Adjacent neighborhood -one facilitated meeting, likely to be held late afternoon or early evening Community at large -web based survey (see below) Chamber of Commerce/Downtown Chanhassen Business Community -one facilitated meeting, likely to be held early morning consistent with business owner availability Elected/Appointed Officials -one facilitated meeting, likely a joint work session of the City Council and the Planning Commission Web based survey -A web based survey such as Mind Mixer or Survey Monkey would be made available to solicit input from interested parties for a defined period of about 4 weeks. Participant input would be monitored and recorded. Study End Product Stakeholder input received from the various facilitated meetings along with the web based sampling will be summarized in a concise report and made available to the city for use by staff, the City Council and Planning Commission. ASSUMPTIONS Base mapping and concepts plans for parcel development will be provided by the city and will be used for any necessary mapping. Work sessions with staff will be the primary source of input to guide decision making. SCHEDULE We will complete this work within a mutually agreed -upon time schedule. Upon a formal notice to proceed, work would commence with a staff work session/kick off meeting. It is assumed that baseline work tasks would occur in April, followed by primary stakeholder group input during May and early June. A summary document would be made available in late June or early July. - 3 - March 30, 2015 BASIS OF PAYMENT/BUDGET We propose to be reimbursed for our services on an hourly basis for the actual time expended. Direct project expenses, such as printing, supplies, reproduction, etc., will be billed at cost, and mileage will be billed at the current allowable IRS rate for business miles. Invoices are submitted on a monthly basis for work performed during the previous month. Payment is due within 30 days. Based on our understanding of the project and our scope of services, we estimate the not -to -exceed cost of our services to be $30,000, which includes both time and expenses. The exact allocation of related consultant staff time toward specific work tasks and stakeholder meetings will be arrived upon in joint discussions between city staff and the consultant project manager. CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF SERVICES It is understood that if the scope or extent of work changes, the cost will be adjusted accordingly. Before any out -of -scope work is initiated, however, we will submit a budget request for the new work and will not begin work until we receive authorization from you. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS The attached Standard Terms and Conditions (Attachment A) together with this proposal for professional services constitute the entire agreement between the Client and SRF Consulting Group, Inc. and supersede all prior written or oral understandings. This agreement may only be amended, supplemented, modified or canceled by a duly executed written instrument. NOTICE TO PROCEED A signed copy of this proposal or a separate letter of authorization, either mailed or emailed to our office, will serve as our notice to proceed. The email address is bwamer@srfconsulting.com. EM March 30, 2015 We sincerely appreciate your consideration of this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Barry J. Warner, FASLA AICP Senior Vice President Attachment A — Standard Terms and Conditions APPROVED: (signer) Name Title Date This cost proposal is valid for a period of 90 days. SRF reserves the right to adjust its cost estimate after 90 days from the date of this proposal SRF PProposal numbers issued by marketing [Document/] ATTACHMENT A STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Standard Tema and Conditions together with the attached Proposal for Professional Services constitute the entire Agreernent between the CLIENT and SRF Consulting Group, Inc. ("SRF") and supersede all prior written or oral understandings. This Agreement may only be amended, supplemerrted, modified, or canceled by a duly executed written instnrnant. 04 Y Will, I byj -,a a a. The standard of care for all professional services performed or famished by SRF miler this Agreement will be the care and skill ordinarily used by members of SRF's profession practicing miler similar chcur stances at the same time and in the same locality. SRF makes no warranties, expressed or implied, under the Agreement or otherwise, in connection with SRF's service. b. The CLIENT shell be responsible for, and SRF may rely upon, the accuracy and crmnpleteness of all requarma ls, programs, instrnactoue, reports, data, and other information finished by CLIENT to SRF pursuant to this Agreement. SRF may use such requirements, reports, data, and infometion in performing or fimrishing services under this Agreement. All duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be fa the sole and exclusive benefit of the CLIENT and SRF and not for the benefit of any other party. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against either the CLIENT or SRF. SRF's services miler this Agreement are being performed solely for the CLIENT's benefit, and no otber entry shall have arty claims against SRF because of &a Agreement or the perforrmnnce or nonperformance of services hereunder. 9EPTEPINSWWWR Invoices will be prepared in accordance with SRF's standard invoicing practices and will be submitted to the CLIENT by SRF monthly, unless otherwise agreed Invoices are due and payable within thirty (30) days of receipt. If the CLIENT fails to make any payment due SRF for services and expanses within forty-five (45) days after receipt of SRF's invoice thereafter, the amounts due SRF will be increased at the rate of I-1 /2% per month (or the n acam in rate of interest permitted by law, if less). In addition, SRF may, after giving seven days written notice to the CLIENT, suspend services under this Agreement urml SRF has been paid in full of amounts due for services, expenses, and other related charges. •• IN Pow I Lei a • To) t:r • N V :4 VIRREWIS Any opinions of costs prepared by SRF represent its judgment as a design professional and are firmahed for the general guidance of the CLIENT. Since SRF has m control over the cost of labor, materials, market condition, or competitive bidding, SRF does not guarantee the accuracy of such cost opinions as compared to contractor or supplier bids or actual cost to the CLIENT. 5. INSURANCE SRF will maintain innranee coverage for Workers' Conyensation, General Liability, Automobile Liability and Professional Liability and will provide certificates of insurance to the CLIENT upon request. 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND ALLOCATION OF RISK a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, SRF agrees to indermrify and hold harmless the CLIENT, their offices, directors and employees against all damages, liabilities or costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees and defense costs) to the extent caused by SRF's negligent acts order this Agreement and that of its subconsultants or anyone for whom SRF is legally liable. b. To the fullest extent pemitted by law, the CLIENT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless SRF, their officers, directors and employees against all damages, liabilities or costs (mcludmig reasonable attorneys' fees and defense costs) to the edennt tensed by the CLIENT's negligent acts under this Agreement and that of its subcansultants or anyone for whom the CLIENT is legally liable. lwi 5 11 Z&V Welav y 2tJ. Either party may at any time, upon seven days prior written notice to the other party, terminate this Agreement Upon such termi iatiM the CLIENT shall pay to SRF all amounts owing to SRF under this Agreement, for all work perfomed up to the effective date ofter®nation All doc rnents prepared or fimnished by SRF pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service, and SRF shall retain an ownership and property interest therein. Reuse of any such documents by the CLIENT shall be at CLIENT's sole risk, and the CLIENT agrees to Page 1 cf 2 (Standard Terms and Cwdhicns) Rev: August 18, 2011 indemnify, and hold SRF harmless from all claims, damages, and expenses including attorney's fees arising out of such reuse of documents by the CLIENT or by others acting through the CLIENT. • 91 Dig*" K% u a. Copies of Documents that may be relied upon by the CLIENT are Invited to the printed copies (also known as hard copies) that are signed or sealed by SRF. Files in electronic media format of text, data, graphics, or of other types that are furnished by SRF to the CLIENT are only for convenience of the CLIENT. Any conclusion or information obtained or derived from such electronic files will be at the user's sole risk. b. When transferring documents in electronic media format, SRF makes no representations as to long-term compatibility, usability, or readability of documents resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those used by SRF at the beginning of Us Assignment. c. If there is a discrepancy between the electronic files and the hard copies, the hard copies govern. d Because data stored in electronic media format can deteriorate or be modified inadvertently or otherwise without authori7Ation of this data's creator, the petty receiving electronic files agrees that it will perform acceptance tests or procedures within sixty (60) days, after which the receiving party shall be deemed to have accepted the data this transferred Any errors detected within the sixty (60) day acceptance period will be corrected by the party delivering the electronic files. SRF shall not be responsible to maintain documents stored in electronic media format after acceptance by the CLIENT. t • : y. �n.;aX 1: SRF shall no be liable for any loss or damage due to failure or delay m rendering any service called for under this Agreanen t resulting from any cause beyond SRF's reasonable control. 11. ASSIGNMENT Neither party shall assign its rights, interests or obligations under this Agreement without the express written consent of the other Doty This Agreement shall bind, and the benefits thereof shall inure to the respective parties hereto, then legal representuives, executors, admuistrators, successors, and assigns. 13. SEVERABILITY AND WAIVER OF PROVISIONS Any provisions or part of the Agreement held to be void or unenforceable under any laws or regulations shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon the CLIENT and SRF, who agree that the Agreement shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision Non -enforcement of any provision by either party shall not constitute a waiver of that provision, nor shall it affect the enf roeability of that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement. EL�•9iiirl7:�11 All provisions of this Agreement regarding Ownership of Documents and Reuse of Documents, Electronic Media provisions, Indern ification and Allocation of Risk, and Dispute Reschmon shall remain in effect. 15. DISPUTE RESOLUTION If negotiation in good faith fails to resolve a dispine within the thirty (30) days of notice of the dispute, m time period specified by applicable law; then the parties agree that each dispute, claim or controversy arising from or related to this Agreement or the relationships which result from this Agreement shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to irutiatiig legal or equitable actions by either party. Unless the parties agree otherwise, the mediation shall be in accordance with the Caminercial Mediation procedures of the American Arbitrafion Association then currently in effect. A request for mediation shall be filed in writing with the American Arbitration Association and the other party. No legal or equitable action may he instituted for a p>eood of ninety (90) days from the filing of the request for mediation unless a longer period of time is provided by agreement of the parties. Cost of mediation shall be shared equally between the parties. Mediation shall be held in a location mutually agreed upon by the parties. Tie parties shall memorialize any agreement resulting from the mediation in a mediated settlement agreement, which agreement shall be enforceable as a settlement in any court having jurisdiction thereof This Agreement is to be governed by the law of the principal place of business of SRF. Page 2 of 2 (Standard Tams and Conditions) Rev: August 18, 2011 &vv ( 4q 11"O"Iriall Dedicated to a healthier you. � 0BELLEUUE MEDICAL CENTER f *.. FREE CONCERTS 0.0�i EVERY FRIDAY NIGHT 1 'Scum11d5 5i11' ier 7Dd11 Vur MI PI(ALC ININR Mav 30-Auciust 22 -k• MAY 30 The Personics 70s, 80s & today's fun rock JUNE 6 Mistaken Blues Band modern blues rock 13 Hott 2 Trott high energy rock'n'roll 20 The 402 past & present super hits 27 The Innocence mix of rock, country & jazz JULY 4 Daybreak feel good music of the 60s & 70S 11 eNVy classic & modern top 40 hits 18 High Heel classic & current female pop hits 2S Lemon Fresh Day current and classic hits AUGUST 1 HIM Hangover high energy rock'n'roll 8 McKenzie River Band classic rock & country 1S Soul Dawg funk & dance tunes 22 Velvet Crush classic & current top hits SPONSORS 6CIIeV Leafkr PAKw Tim Gumllffin LAVWAS 'A !i. INTERACTIVE W,.�ATEE�R FFEE�AY ru_vr:r c11 n'I fIT..1YFrlIe DIRECTORY OF STORES O 1p�� AW � 0F NORTH I FAMILY FRIENDLv WATER U FEAIpi S OPEN MEMOIPIAI DAY IUtOUGH I AUOR UAY m az O��N DRrVE OPENING !♦ FALL 2014 © fit A Access to Shadow Lake Management Office, Weight Watchers, Sarpy County Chamber of Commerce %[BiIi.ilxuI'. M11)RALCENI ER O SHADOW LAKE l"OWNE CENTER' , , dL � � PY '% yp,4K ' CSC) TOWNE e D C DICK'S SPORTING IC GOODS LOB b D9 I sx�ID wwl LIJAII 13 Maeegement once fit Restroome 13 ATM ® Bicycle Racks , '�"ems. A ❑� Hy P P •. ■ [LPapillion o hurxa 7■mY�r Scan for location onua,va 1-80 HEADING EAST: Exit at Highway 370 and continue east to 72nd St. 1-80 HEADING WEST: Exit at 72nd St. and continue south to Highway 370 1-480/HIGHWAY 75: Exit at Highway 370 and continue west to 72nd St. SHADOW LAIU TOWNE CENTEK SW corner of Highway 370 & 72nd St, Papillion, Nebraska 402.537.0046 S hadow La keShopp i ng.co m Monday -Saturday, 10am-9pm Sunday, Noon-6pm Individual store and restaurant hours may vary 00 190 SMJow L.. Town. C..,.Io minapBtl by WWW.IEEGWBOhT9I1I.COT SVMMEP 301< SHADOW LAKE TOWNE CENTER' 2014 SUMMER DIRECTORY i a i Wl orb �111111111112 T15 CJ Banks 402-592-1644 16 Cacique 402-339-2578 U77 Chico's 402-339-9040 T17 Christopher & Banks 402-597-4783 dressbarn 402-339-2446 U7 Jos. A. Bank 402-537-5900 Lane Bryant _ 402-609-5433 U9 LOF T 402-339-1288 US inaurices 402-597-8694 Old Navy 402-331-1192 T11 rue21 _ 402-339-1255 f13 Runway Boutique 402-334-6956 _ E T.J. Maxx 402-537-1062 U11 Victoria's Secret 402-339-1951 R17 Justice 402-592-1136 R3 The Children's Place 402-592-1224 H3 Famous Footwear 402-597-5718 S13 Finish Line 402-597-8835 - - 08 Buffalo Wild Wings 402-596-9464 T25 _ Chocolaterie Stam 402-933-7826 y Freddy's Frozen Custard 402-597-8909 T_5 Morning, Noon & Night 402-933-38_36 T1 _ - Nebraska Brewing Company 402-934-7100 63 Old Chicago 402-592-2739 R21 Orange Leaf Yogurt 402-614-7200 09 Red Robin Gourmet Burgers 402-331-1349 011 Subway 402-934-8891 01 Taco Bell 402-339-1875 05 Texas Roadhouse 402-592-7427 R9 Tropical Smoothie Cafe 402-614-9050 S1 Wheatfields 402-592-9713 3er_v_ices X2 Alegent Creighton Health Quick Care (inside Hy-yee) D Aspen Athletic Club 402-884-7377 919 AT&T 402-339-2944 Ol _ Banfield Pet Hospital onside PetSmart) 402-331-1108 04 Charter West National Bank 402-339-2700 U3- Cox Solutions Store 402-932-0032 Vislonworks(formerly Eyemasters) 402-339-2481 011 Firestone Complete Auto Care 402-331-4400 0 First National Bank of Omaha 402-602-2500 02 Hy-Vee Gas 402-339-4290 T7 LensCrafters 402-592-3239 T9 Portrait Innovations 402-331-0515 Xl SAC Federal Credit Union ons.u,• ny-v,,E) 402-829-6409 Sprint 402.597.1000 U13 Sola Salon Studios 402-650-2076 U12 Top Nails 402-763-4888 07 Verizon Wireless 102-898-031r, Department Stores M Gordmans 402-331-4200 JCPenney - 402-592-1825 Specialty Stores T21 Bath & Body Works 402-592-6541 F _ Bed Bath & Beyond 402-935-4086 P _ Best Buy 402-331-1847 L7 Charming Charlie 402-331-0888 s17 Claire's 402-592-1768 L2 Complete Nutrition 402-885-8800 B Dick's Sporting Goods 402-592-1642 17 Dollar Tree 402-339-9493 519 GNC 402-339-1749 H5 Hallmark 402-592-2270 T27 Kay Jewelers 402-597-4785 Mattress Firm 402-934-1100 S19 Michaels Opening Fall N Office Max 402-597-8701 O PetSmart 402-537-0323 1-13 Pier 1 Imports 402-339-4006 L1 Sally Beauty Supply 402-331-4382 J2 Sephora(inside JCPenney) 402-592-1825 S9 Things Remembered 402-359-1504 59 Tip Top Tux 402-289-3601 G ULTA 402-592-1190 U_10Yankee Candle 402-596-9000 Grocery--- -- _ X Hy-Vee 402-597-5790 Office Directory (second floor above Wheatoclds)' Shadow Lake Management Office 402-537-0046 Sarpy County Chamber of Commerce 402-339-3050 Weight Watchers 800-651-6000 �SUUARE ?4r corner it4 worU From: "Darren B. Lazan, RLA" <dlazan@landform.net> Subject: Updated Summary - AUAR and Visioning Date: April 10, 2015 at 3:26:50 PM CDT To: Scott Carlston <scott@carlston.com> There are essentially two items before the council next week: Staff is asking council to approve a "Visioning Process" — discussed at work session at 5:00 and potentially approved at the CC meeting Staff has presented a fee proposal for the AUAR for council consideration — Discussed and potentially approved at the CC meeting Visioning Exercise The council's direction to staff at the last meeting was to work directly with the developer (us) on ways to address use/users on the site. Staff never reached out to us to open this dialog. Instead, staff has engaged yet another consultant (and yet another fee), to lead a 3-month visioning exercise of which we, (the actual owners of the subject property) play a very minor role. In fact, we were told the meetings were "public" but they would prefer we not attend the majority of these meetings where they plan to discuss what is appropriate for our site. The City already adopted a vision for this property and updated their comprehensive plan for this site as Regional Commercial. Our plan will help the city implement the adopted vision. The scope of this study is extensive - numerous meetings with a number of parties to address uses, design, landscaping, and other options — all premature as we have not even submitted a PUD application in which those items are addressed in our proposal. The study delays 3 months and adds significant costs to the AUAR for which we are paying. The study jeopardizes the schedule and potential users we have interested in the project. We were encouraged, required, and thanked for inviting neighbors onto our project to discuss the proposed development, yet staff proposes a study, focused on OUR PROPERTY, in which we are excluded, or at best minimized? AUAR The original full AUAR was done in 2003 for roughly $100k and took 6 months to complete. This included full studies in every category of the report, generating numerous exhibits and narratives, and developing several development options from scratch. The process required is an UPDATE to the original AUAR, not a new AUAR. Since the original study there have been considerable additional studies in many key areas — utilities, traffic, land use, etc. The most critical of updates — traffic — has been extensively studied especially for Powers which has been reconstructed, and Lyman which is currently under construction, so this is very thorough and current info. Development has occurred on roughly 2/3rds of the study area removing most variables in the study. Extensive work has been done by the city on our site to evaluate development options since 2003. We have prepared and provided information specific to our proposal to facilitate that option. The new proposal prepared by staff is for over $90k and is projected to take 6 months — almost the same as the full AUAR, even though it is supposed to be just an update. Staff indicated on several occasions in Oct/Nov. that they felt the scope of the AUAR update was $50k and 3 months. It has clearly expanded. Examples of recent AUAR updates in the metro area for similar projects o Roseville— 275 acres, $85,000, 3 months, litigation involved o Ramsey — 150 acres, $37,000 and 3 months, significant traffic issues — o St. Louis Park - $15,245, Traffic and utilities updateda3 weeks �� o Woodbury— 590 acres, $10,664, ongoing J eio U�u,�,h &"QU • We feel the scope has been extended and expanded to include items CLEARLY outside the intent and purpose of the AUAR o Eight "workshops" 0 12 hours of "additional" meetings o Chamber lunch 0 2 council meetings o Public open house o Three "Agency" meetings 0 7 meetings with staff/property owners o Field traffic counts at 7 intersections o Pedestrian routes, trails, open space, not in the original study We feel the scope has been extended and expanded to include this visioning process which is outside the direction of council We feel the proposed scope and schedule of the AUAR and the Visioning Study will have a deliberate and damaging effect on the success of this project. The visioning exercise ignores the inherent rights of the private property owners to develop in accordance with existing zoning and land use. As the owners of the land, and the developers proposing the project, we should be allowed to make an application for a conforming use on our property. That application should outline our vision for our property, and the city should evaluate that against the current guidelines and city goals. To take a preemptive role in "Visioning" the property, circumvents our rights to bring a project forward. Proposing this process with little to no input from us as the owners is overreaching. If the city staff want to be the developer, they should make an offer to purchase the property. We respectfully request the CC table the discussion on this extensive Visioning study, and once again direct staff to engage in discussions with us directly to see if there is even a disconnect in our vision. We respectfully request the CC direct staff to reduce the scope and schedule of the AUAR to that normally completed as an update, and proceed with that effort immediately. Darren B. Lazan, RLA-LANDFORM, PresidentTel: 612-638-025010 • L A N D F O R M From Site to Finish 0 0 • • M M105 South Fifth Avenue Tel 612-252-9070 Suite 513 Fax: 612-252-9077_Minneapolis, MN 55401 W& www.landform.net f I t in Chapter VI SALES POTENTIAL AND SUPPORTABLE GLA The Chan-212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas have the potential to support more GLA than can be accommodated at the proposed development. This creates the enviable situation where the developer can choose from a wide variety of retail stores to establish its market position. Supportable GLA_ Estimated Chan-212 supportable GLA by retail store type is contained in Table 27. In almost every category, supportable space exceeds the median store size. These estimates of supportable square feet are likely to be understated due to the high trade area household income. Also, there are likely to be a large proportion of high income and high asset households where there are few constraints on discretionary spending. Tahle 27 CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS SUPPORTABLE GLA (Gras Leasable Arta) Store Sim Merchandise Category CONVENIENCE GOODS 2015 2020 2025 Low Median High Food Stores Grocery stores 94,087 113,202 135?61 31,676 52-%0 65,80 Supermarkets 92,189 110,915 132,528 31,245 52,419 69,467 Convenience Food 2,913 3,507 4,190 1,349 2,085 5,323 Specialty Food Stores 7,650 9,205 11,000 1,188 2,400 6,000 Meat Markets 2,529 3,036 3,631 1,130 2,215 18,090 Baked Goods 524 632 756 1,191 1,834 3,285 Confectionery and Nut Stores 409 494 591 702 I,240 2,047 All Other Specialty Food Stores 1,095 1,315 1,570 1,069 2.200 8,007 Omer Convenience Goods Drug At Proprietary Stores 20,480 24,643 29,443 8= 11,700 23,714 Hardware 7,795 9,384 11,211 5,638 13,831 27,743 Liquor 19,819 23,945 28,491 1,305 2,956 7,210 Florist 2,879 3,463 4,137 766 1,600 5,396 Food/Heahh Supplement Stores 1,400 1,684 Z012 I,7A0 1,234 1,968 Food Service Full -Service Restaurants Lnnhed Service Restaurants 72,594 41,438 88,319 50,415 106,481 60,783 2,000 1,335 4,500 3,000 9,775 3,400 Cafeterias 3,528 4,294 5,170 517 1,073 10,049 Snack & Beverage Places 14,733 17,927 21,613 850 1,500 2,495 Ice Cream & Soft Serve 1,702 2,071 2,492 902 1,148 1,570 Frozen Yogurt 275 340 405 1,031 I= 1,700 Doughnut Shops 3,518 4,-n 5,159 744 I= Z153 Bagel Shops 804 978 1,178 2,000 2,398 3,400 Coffee Shops 4,698 5,713 6,888 881 1,500 2,000 Cookie Shops 138 170 203 220 602 797 Other Snack Shops 2,456 2,986 3,600 850 1,578 Z495 Gasoliue Sva stations/Cony Gas/Convenience Food Stores 6,619 8,052 9,708 1,500 2,933 6,121 42 Table 27 (continued) CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS SUPPORTABLEGLA BY MNRCHANDIS E CATEGORY (Gross 1<uable Area) Store Sim Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 Low Median High SHOPPING GOODS General Merchandise Department Stores (Incl. leased depts.) Discount Stores 216,494 263,376 317,536 57,720 94,798 141,986 Department Stores 157,156 191,200 230.520 89,641 148,796 243,167 Other General Merchandise Stores Warehouse Clubs and Supementers 270,224 329,758 396,362 90,134 151,980 217,447 Dollar Stores 23,218 28,M 34.055 Z726 81000 13,798 Miscellaneous General Merchandise 47,148 57,360 69,156 3,2W 8,400 11,212 Apparel & Accessories Clothing Stores Mena and Boys 10,050 12,223 14,732 2,002 4,000 5,635 Womens Clothing 49,115 59,755 72,040 2,074 4,200 8,740 Children's &Infant 18,929 23,029 27,767 1,490 3,912 6,000 Family Clothing 87,835 106,862 IX835 2,374 8,000 28228 Clothing Accessories Stores 4,659 5,666 6,831 918 1,40D 2,001 Other Clothing Stores 13,902 16,909 20,399 1,060 2,300 8,2M Shoe Stores Men's 921 1,117 1,348 903 1,640 2,186 Women's 1,759 Z137 2,574 1,309 2,394 3,158 Children's & Infant 42A 514 621 1,490 3,912 6,000 Family Shoe Stores 28,063 34,143 41,166 Z021 3,388 10,234 Athletic Footwear 11,931 14,514 17,491 1,535 3,284 11,314 Furniture & Home Furnishings Furniture 74,612 90,773 109,442 3,108 7,927 36,712 Floor Coverings 32,742 39,836 48,022 1,229 3,593 7,819 Window Treatment Stores 3,510 4,267 5,143 1,489 4,905 9,934 Ali Other Home Furnishings Stores 49,114 59,749 72,040 2,868 3,570 6,500 Electronics & Appliances Stores Household Appliance Stores 26,255 31,938 38,505 2,349 4,000 7,563 Radio, TV& Electronics Stores 99;203 120,693 145,517 1" 3,406 10,451 Computers, Software, Music,& Other Electronics 15,241 19,543 22,357 997 3,388 25,600 Other Shopping Goods Sporting Goods 81,035 98,585 11W 2,238 7,500 44,116 General Line Sporting Cods 33,155 40,335 48,625 3,765 5,850 28,128 Specialty Line Sporting Goods 47,564 51,797 62,431 1,097 2,449 4,356 Book Stores & Newsdealers 28,394 34,544 41,650 2,428 4,542 29,974 Stationery Stores and Office Supply 16,043 19,520 23,531 585 1,033 2,217 Musical Instrument & Supplies 11,254 13,696 16,513 2,432 7,324 26.094 Jewelry Stores 28,332 34,471 41,560 790 1,450 3,410 Hobby, Toy & Crate 25,257 30,726 37,051 1,604 4,050 25,961 Camera & Photographic Supply 6,695 8,149 9,822 816 2,200 5,965 Gift, Novelty & Souvenirs 33,567 40,827 49,227 2,369 4,422 7,015 Luggage & Leather Goods 3,065 3,735 4,500 1,193 2,300 3,102 Sewing, Needlework &Piece Goods 23,330 28,390 34,210 2,678 12,202 19,299 Pet Stores 7.Z100 26,895 32,420 1,947 3,200 12,398 An Dealers 3,276 3,982 4,800 675 1,434 2,401 Optical Goods Stores IZ703 15,452 18.631 895 1,561 4.068 Pre -Recorded Tapes, Compact Discs 3,048 3,709 4,470 1" 3,426 12,753 Cosmetics, Beauty Supplies & Perfume 9,409 11,447 13,800 1,102 1,953 6,235 AS Other Health & Personal Care 18,753 22,811 27,505 697 1,786 3,084 43 Table 27 (continued) CHAN-212 SHOPPLNG GOODS SLPPORTABLEGLA BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (Gross Leasable Area) Store Sim _ Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 Low Median High OTHER RErAR, STORES Building Materials & Garden Supplies Budding Materials & Supplies Stores Hama Centers 91,060 110,786 133,566 8,981 95,173 135,833 Paint, Glass & Wallpaper 9,564 11,636 14,031 2,348 3,533 5,028 Lawn & Garden Equipment Outdoor Power Equipment 25,590 31,140 37,540 N/A N/A N/A Retail Nurseries, Lawn & Carden 72,890 88,680 106,920 N/A 15,000 N/A Motor Vehicles & Parts Dealers Auto Pans & Accessories Stores 25,010 30,425 36,685 2,232 6,500 13,000 The Dealers 18,900 2.2,995 27,725 3,514 6,944 12,014 SERVICES Personal Care Services Beauty Shops 16,084 9,111 10,879 900 1,400 3,480 Nail Salons 2,027 1,145 1,373 773 U00 1,807 Diet & Weight Reducing Services 1,320 747 893 1= 1,856 3,130 Other Personal Care Services 2,509 1,417 1,691 703 1,488 4,128 Drycleaning & laundry Services Drycleanmg & Laundry Services (except coin -op.) 4,367 9,880 11,807 1,038 1,608 2,731 Other Personal Services Child Day Care Services 14,750 16,710 19,960 3,059 5,050 7,495 Photographic Studios 2,156 2,440 2,916 990 1,866 2,550 Vetemnarian Services 9,849 11,151 13,329 1,346 2,122 2,701 Pet Care 3,387 3,827 4,560 900 1,200 1,500 Rental and Using Formalwear and Costume Rental 482 729 871 763 1,046 1,773 Home Health Equipment Rental 1,664 2,516 3,008 1,200 1,600 3,480 Recreation Physical Fitness Facilites 67,750 76,725 91,663 1,433 6,448 32,170 Health Care Offices of Physicians Offices of Physicians 69,703 83,863 100,202 969 1,652 4,008 Offices of Dentists 32,197 19,368 23,145 1,090 1,700 3,970 Offices of Chiropractors 4,649 2,797 3,342 1,090 1,600 3,970 Offices of Optometrists 1,764 3,183 3,805 1,074 1,620 4,347 Offices of Mental Health Practitioners 2,391 4,316 5,157 1,090 1,800 3,970 Physical & Occupational Therapists 4,006 7,232 8,641 1,090 1,600 3,970 Source: McComb Goup, Ltd Shopping Center Size Sales potential and supportable square feet provide an indication of shopping center potential. Shopping center size will depend on tenant interest and the number of anchor stores. The potential GLA by store category ranges from 825,000 square feet to 1,120,000 square feet, as shown in Table 28. Convenience goods ranges from 105,000 square feet to 135,000 square feet depending on supermarket size and number of other retailers. Convenience goods includes stores where 44 convenience is a primary consideration as they are visited on a regular basis. Examples include supermarkets, drug, liquor, hardware, and other stores and services. Table 28 Cross Leasable Area Store Category Low High Convenience Goods 105,000 135,000 Shopping Goods Anchor Stores 120,000 220,000 Junior Anchors 220,000 315,000 Inline Stores 110,000 180,000 ' Subtotal 450,000 715,000 Food Service t Restaurants Fast Food 20,000 15,000 30,000 20,000 Subtotal 35,000 50,000 Services 20,000 30,000 t Destination Stores Health Club 50,000 60,000 Home Center 115,000 115,000 Cinema 50,000 60,000 Subtotal 215,000 235,000 ' Total 825,000 1,165,000 Source: McComb Croup, Ltd rShopping goods retailers are stores where comparison shopping is a common part of the shopping trip. Department stores typically anchor these shopping centers. Potential anchor store GLA ' ranges from 120,000 square feet to 220,000 square feet. Junior anchor retailers are various size stores, ranging in size from 10,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet, also adding the center's drawing power. Junior anchor GLA could range from 220,000 square feet to 315,000 square feet. ' Inline, small store tenants could range from 110,000 square feet to 180,000 square feet. Total shopping goods stores could range from 450,000 square feet to 715,000 square feet. Food service establishments are expected to range from 35,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet. Services of various types could range from 20,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet. Destination retailers like health clubs, home centers, and cinemas, could total 215,000 square feet to 235,000 square feet if all three located at Chan-212. It is possible that not all the anticipated potential tenants will located at Chan-212 indicating that the shopping center is likely to be between 800,000 square feet and 1,000,000 square feet. 1 45 I Sales Potential NEstimated sales potential by retail store type is contained in Table 29. These estimates of sales potential are likely to be understated due to the high trade area household income. Table 29 CHAN-212 SALES POTENTIAL BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (In Thousands of Dollars) Merchandise Catesory 2015 2020 2025 CONVINIDVCEGOODS Food Stores Grocery Stores $ 43,280 $ 52,073 $ 62,220 Supermarkets 42,407 51,021 60,963 Convenience Food 874 1,052 1,257 Specialty Food Stores 1,530 1,841 2,200 Meat Markets 569 683 817 Baked Goods 131. 158 189 Confectionery and Nut Stores 131 158 189 All Other Specialty Food Stores 219 263 314 Other Convenience Goods Drug & Proprietary Stores $ 9,421 $ 11,336 $ 13,544 Hardware 1,442 1,736 2,074 Liquor 7,432 8,942 10,684 Florist 547 658 786 Food/Health Supplement Stores 350 421 503 Food Service Fu0-Service Restaurants $ 26,134 $ 31,795 $ 38t,333 Limited Service Restaurants 16,575 20,166 24,313 Cafeterias 829 1,009 1,215 Snack& Beverage Places 4,420 5,378 6,484 Ice Cream & Soft Serve 553 673 810 Frozen Yogurt 55 68 81 Doughnut Shops 774 941 1,135 Bagel Shops 221 269 324 Coffee Shops 1,879 2,285 2,755 Cookie Shops 55 68 81 Other Snack Shops 884 1,075 1,296 Gasoline Svs Stations/Cone Gas/Convenience Food Stores $ 9,266 $ 11,273 $ 13,591 46 i Table 29 (continued) CHAN-212 SALES POTENTIAL BYMERCHANDISECATEGORY (In Thousands of Dollars) Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 SHOPPING GOODS General Merchandise Department Stores (Incl. leased depts.) Discount Stores $ 54,121 S 65,944 $ 79,384 Department Stores 35,360 43,020 51,867 Other General Merchandise Stores Warehouse Clubs and Supercenters $ 121,601 $ 147,941 S 178,363 Dollar Stores 5,108 6,215 7,492 Miscellaneous General Merchandise 11,787 14,340 17,289 Apparel & Accessories Clothing Stores Mens and Boys S 2,211 $ 2,689 S 3,241 Womens Clothing 9,823 11,951 14,408 Children's & Infant 4,543 5,527 6,664 Family Clothing 22,837 27,784 33,497 Clothing Accessories Stores 1,351 1,643 1,981 Other Clothing Stores 3,684 4,481 5,403 Shoe Stores Men's $ 267 S 324 S 391 Women's 475 577 695 Children's & Infant 123 149 ISO Family Shoe Stores 4,911 5,975 7,204 Athletic Footwear 2,088 2,540 3,061 Furniture & Home Furnishings Furniture $ 19,399 S 23,601 $ 28,455 Floor Coverings 7,367 8,963 10,805 Window Treatment Stores 737 896 1,080 All Other Home Furnishings Stores 8,595 10,456 12,607 Electronics & Appliances Stores Household Appliance Stores $ 7,220 $ 8,783 $ 10,589 Radio, TV & Electronics Stores 29,761 36,208 43,655 Computers, Software, Music, & Other Electronics 8,840 10,755 12,967 Other Shopping Goods Sporting Goods $ 16,207 S 19,717 S 23,772 General Line Sporting Goods 6,631 8,067 9,725 Specialty Line Sporting Goods 9,577 11,652 14,047 Book Stores & Newsdealers 4,543 5,527 6,664 Stationery Stores and Office Supply 6,016 7,320 8,824 Musical Instmment & Supplies 2,701 3,287 3,963 Jewelry Stores 9,208 11,203 13,507 Hobby, Toy & Game 4,420 5,377 6,484 Camera & Photographic Supply 1,841 2,241 2,701 Gift, Novelty & Souvenirs 5,035 6,124 7,384 Luggage & Leather Goods 613 747 900 Sewing, Needlework & Piece Goods 2,333 2,939 3,421 Pet Stores 4,420 5,377 6,484 Art Dealers 737 896 1,080 Optical Goods Stores 3,684 4,481 5,403 Pre -Recorded Tapes, Compact Discs 701 853 1,028 Cosmetics, Beauty Supplies & Perfume 3,011 3,663 4,416 All 0therHeahh&Personal Care 5,157 6,273 7,564 47 Tatle 29 (continued) CHAN-212 SALES POTENTIAL BY MERCHANDIS E CATEGORY (In Thousands of Dollars) Merchandise Category 2015 OTHER RETAIL STORES Building Materials & Garden Supplies Building Materials & Supplies Stores Home Centers Paint, (lass & Wallpaper Lawn & Garden Equipment Outdoor Power Equipment Retail Nurseries, Lawn & Carden Motor Vehicles & Parts Dealers Auto Paris & Accessories Stores Tire Dealers SERVICES Personal Care Services Beauty Shops Nail Salons Diet & Weight Reducing Services Other Personal Care Services Drycleaning & Laundry Services Drycleaning & Laundry Services (except coin -op.) Other Personal Services Child Day Care Services Photographic Studios Veteranarian Services Pet Care Rental and Leasing Formalwear and Costume Rental Home Health Equipment Rental Recreation Physical Fitness Facilites Health Care Offices of Physicians Offices of Physicians Offices of Dentists Offices of Chiropractors Offices of Optometrists Offices of Mental Health Practitioners Physical & Occupational Therapists Source: McComb Croup, Ltd 2020 2025 $ 31,871 $ 38,775 $ 46,748 2,152 2,618 3,157 Z559 3,114 3,754 7,289 8,868 10,692 $ 5,002 $ 6,085 $ 7,337 3,780 4,599 5,545 $ 3,056 $ 1,731 $ 2,067 223 126 151 198 112 134 439 248 296 $ 655 $ 1,482 $ 1,771 $ 1,475 $ 1,671 $ 1,996 593 671 802 2,216 2,509 2,999 254 287 342 $ 176 $ 266 $ 318 416 629 752 $ 5,420 $ 6,138 $ 7,333 $ 24,884 $ 29,939 $ 35,772 11,108 6,682 7,985 1,604 965 1,153 732 U21 1,579 825 1,489 1,779 1,382 2,495 2,981 48 From: "Darren B. Lazan, RLA" <dlazan@landform.net> Subject: Updated Summary - AUAR and Visioning Date: April 10, 2015 at 3:26:50 PM CDT To: Scott Carlston <scott@carlston.com> There are essentially two items before the council next week: Staff is asking council to approve a "Visioning Process" — discussed at work session at 5:00 and potentially approved at the CC meeting Staff has presented a fee proposal for the AUAR for council consideration — Discussed and potentially approved at the CC meeting Visioning Exercise The council's direction to staff at the last meeting was to work directly with the developer (us) on ways to address use/users on the site. Staff never reached out to us to open this dialog. Instead, staff has engaged yet another consultant (and yet another fee), to lead a 3-month visioning exercise of which we, (the actual owners of the subject property) play a very minor role. In fact, we were told the meetings were "public" but they would prefer we not attend the majority of these meetings where they plan to discuss what is appropriate for our site. The City already adopted a vision for this property and updated their comprehensive plan for this site as Regional Commercial. Our plan will help the city implement the adopted vision. The scope of this study is extensive - numerous meetings with a number of parties to address uses, design, landscaping, and other options — all premature as we have not even submitted a PUD application in which those items are addressed in our proposal. The study delays 3 months and adds significant costs to the AUAR for which we are paying. The study jeopardizes the schedule and potential users we have interested in the project. We were encouraged, required, and thanked for inviting neighbors onto our project to discuss the proposed development, yet staff proposes a study, focused on OUR PROPERTY, in which we are excluded, or at best minimized? AUAR The original full AUAR was done in 2003 for roughly $100k and took 6 months to complete. This included full studies in every category of the report, generating numerous exhibits and narratives, and developing several development options from scratch. The process required is an UPDATE to the original AUAR, not a new AUAR. Since the original study there have been considerable additional studies in many key areas — utilities, traffic, land use, etc. The most critical of updates — traffic — has been extensively studied especially for Powers which has been reconstructed, and Lyman which is currently under construction, so this is very thorough and current info. Development has occurred on roughly 2/3rds of the study area removing most variables in the study. Extensive work has been done by the city on our site to evaluate development options since 2003. We have prepared and provided information specific to our proposal to facilitate that option. The new proposal prepared by staff is for over $90k and is projected to take 6 months — almost the same as the full AUAR, even though it is supposed to be just an update. Staff indicated on several occasions in Oct/Nov. that they felt the scope of the AUAR update was $50k and 3 months. It has clearly expanded. Examples of recent AUAR updates in the metro area for similar projects o Roseville — 275 acres, $85,000, 3 months, litigation involved o Ramsey— 150 acres, $37,000 and 3 months, significant traffic issues o St. Louis Park - $15,245, Traffic and utilities updated, 3 weeks o Woodbury— 590 acres, $10,664, ongoing • We feel the scope has been extended and expanded to include items CLEARLY outside the intent and purpose of the AUAR o Eight "workshops" 0 12 hours of "additional' meetings o Chamber lunch 0 2 council meetings o Public open house o Three "Agency" meetings 0 7 meetings with staff/property owners o Field traffic counts at 7 intersections o Pedestrian routes, trails, open space, not in the original study We feel the scope has been extended and expanded to include this visioning process which is outside the direction of council We feel the proposed scope and schedule of the AUAR and the Visioning Study will have a deliberate and damaging effect on the success of this project. The visioning exercise ignores the inherent rights of the private property owners to develop in accordance with existing zoning and land use. As the owners of the land, and the developers proposing the project, we should be allowed to make an application for a conforming use on our property. That application should outline our vision for our property, and the city should evaluate that against the current guidelines and city goals. To take a preemptive role in "Visioning" the property, circumvents our rights to bring a project forward. Proposing this process with little to no input from us as the owners is overreaching. If the city staff want to be the developer, they should make an offer to purchase the property. We respectfully request the CC table the discussion on this extensive Visioning study, and once again direct staff to engage in discussions with us directly to see if there is even a disconnect in our vision. We respectfully request the CC direct staff to reduce the scope and schedule of the AUAR to that normally completed as an update, and proceed with that effort immediately. Darren B. Lazan, RLA LANDFORM, PresidentTel: 612-638-0250D0 • L A N D F O R M Rom Site to Finish • • • • 0 M105 South Fifth Avenue Tel: 612-252-9070_Suite 513 Fax: 612-252-9077 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Web www.landform.net Kimley — Horn Comments Overall Budget - $51,960. Work will be performed on an hourly basis with the $51,960 being a not -to -exceed amount. Specific tasks and estimated costs are as follows: Review Proposed Development Plan Changes - $1,410 Review/understand 3 development scenarios Traffic/Transportation - $21,490 Collect existing conditions traffic counts (7 intersections) and other existing conditions information for the project area +/- $7,000 Run traffic model for proposed conditions for 3 alternative development scenarios +/- $10,000 Develop recommendations and mitigation measures +/- $4,500 Sanitary Sewer and Water - $5,220 Update existing conditions maps to include improvements since 2003 and review City water and sewer comp plans +/- $2,000 Review flow demands for 3 alternative development scenarios +/- $1,500 Develop recommendations and mitigation measures +/- $1,700 Storm Water - $7,680 Update existing conditions maps to include improvements since 2003 and review City storm comp plan +/- $2,000 Determine storm water management requirements for 3 alternative development scenarios +/- $2,500 Develop recommendations and mitigation measures +/- $3,200 AUAR Mitigation Plan Prep - $3,560 Write traffic, sanitary sewer, water, and storm water portions of the AUAR mitigation plan Meetings - $9,600 13 meetings (possible meetings with City Council, developer, key area property owners, agencies, City staff, one open house meeting) Expenses - $3,000 HKGi Comments 1. The original AUAR done in 2003 began in April and was completed in December. The original AUAR took 9 months approximately. 2. The fees reflect updating an AUAR that has not been updated for more than 10 years. Additional planning efforts since that time have been done, need to be reviewed, and accounted for in the update. This takes time and effort. 3. HKGi's fees are on the high end. This is to avoid any delays in the project that would result by us having to seek additional services should the review process require significant changes to any of the concepts, which have not been thoroughly vetted by the public as I understand it. HKGi's fee proposal is based on an hourly billing cycle. Budget not absorbed by the project will not be billed. HKGi's fee is proposed as a not to exceed fee for the services described in the proposal. 4. Six months is a reasonable time frame to allow for adequate reviews and required actions, notices, etc... If along the way the project has opportunities to be accelerated without compromising any aspects of the project, such acceleration can occur without any contract amendments. 5. The overall costs to complete the update are difficult to compare to other AUAR's without having a keen understanding of the issues and complexities of each. Update costs vary widely. ��NNESpl9 2"' o 02 i m0 Quick Reference: Alternative Urban Areawide Review �F�rAt "VP' AUAR process steps: RGU orders an AUAR, RGU develops draftHrnin Draft document Comment period ends which is published in AUAR and mitigationdistributed for after 30 calendar days, the EQB Monitor plan oments & published plus an optional 15 EQB Monitor business day extension State Agencies and RGU revises AUAR Met Council have 10 based on comments days to file and and distributes final objection document to agencies and Met Council O Q ors To No DION ' m RGU adopts AUAR document and Negotiations mitigation plan. Resolved between RGU and Both are published Objecting Agency in the EQB Monitor z 0 4aP9pdt o P N O. EQB action needed to determine AUAR adequacy AUAR update process steps: RGU Completes a RGU revises and draft update distributesfinal upc document No Db'ed' RGU adopts AUAR document and Resolved mitigation plan and is published in the EQB Monitor 4 CP94O,rP Helpful flip: An appeals process can occur at any decision point. Document is published in the EQB Monitor and 10 day comment period begins/ends O 0 Negotiations between RGU and Objecting Agency z m o Z Z m a EQB action needed to determine AUAR adequacy 4410.3610 - Minnesota Administrative Rules Page 1 of 6 The Reviwr of Statutes website will be unavailable from 6pm Thursday, April 2nd, to Noon Friday, April 3rd. Minnesota Administrative Rules Authenticate 4410.3610 ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW PROCESS. Subpart 1. Applicability. A local unit of government may use the procedures of this part instead of the procedures of parts 4410.1100 to 4410.1700 and 4410.2100 to 4410.3000 to review anticipated residential, commercial, warehousing, and light industrial development and associated infrastructure in a particular geographic area within its jurisdiction, if the local unit has adopted a comprehensive plan that includes at least the elements in items A to C. The procedures of this part may not be used to review any project meeting the requirements for a mandatory EAW in part 4410.4300, subparts 2 to 13, 15 to 17, 18, item B or C, or 24, or a mandatory EIS in part 4410.4400, subparts 2 to 10, 12, 13, or 25. The local unit of government is the RGU for any review conducted under this part. A. A land use plan designating the existing and proposed location, intensity, and extent of use of land and water for residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, and other public and private purposes. B. A public facilities plan describing the character, location, timing, sequence, function, use, and capacity of existing and future public facilities of the local governmental unit. The public facilities plan must include at least the following parts: (1) a transportation plan describing, designating, and scheduling the location, extent, function, and capacity of existing and proposed local public and private transportation facilities and services; and (2) a sewage collection system policy plan describing, designating, and scheduling the areas to be served by the public system, the existing and planned capacities of the public system, and the standards and conditions under which the installation of private sewage treatment systems will be permitted. C. An implementation program describing public programs, fiscal devices, and other actions to be undertaken to implement the comprehensive plan. The implementation plan must include a description of official controls addressing the matters of zoning, subdivision, and private sewage treatment systems, a schedule for the implementation of those controls, and a capital improvements program for public facilities. A local governmental unit that has an adopted comprehensive plan that lacks any of the elements required by this subpart may qualify for the use of the procedures of this part upon a demonstration to the EQB chair that the lacking element would have no substantial effect on the purpose of or outcome of the environmental review and upon receiving authorization from the EQB chair to use these procedures. Subp. 2. Relationship to specific development projects. A. Upon completion of review under this part, residential, commercial, warehousing, and light industrial development projects and associated infrastructure within the boundaries established under subpart 3 that are consistent with development assumptions established under subpart 3 are exempt from review under parts 4410.1100 to 4410.1700 and 4410.2100 to 4410.3000 as long as the approval and construction of the project complies with the conditions of the plan for mitigation developed under subpart 5. B. The prohibitions of part 4410.3100, subparts I and 2, apply to all projects for which review under this part substitutes for review under parts 4410.1100 to 4410.1700 or 4410.2100 to 4410.3000. These prohibitions terminate upon the adoption by the RGU of the environmental analysis document and plan for mitigation under subpart 5. https://www.revisor.nm.gov/rules/?id=4410.3610 4/3/2015 4410.3610 - Minnesota Administrative Rules Page 2 of 6 C. If a specific residential, commercial, warehousing, light industrial, or associated infrastructure project, that is subject to an EAW or EIS, is proposed within the boundaries of an area for which an alternative review under this part is planned or is in preparation but has not yet been completed, the RGU may, at its discretion, review the specific project either through the alternative areawide review procedures or through the EAW or EIS procedures. If the project is reviewed through the alternative areawide review procedures, at least one set of development assumptions used in the process must be consistent with the proposed project, and the project must incorporate the applicable mitigation measures developed through the process. D. The ordering of a review pursuant to subpart 3 does not constitute a finding by the RGU that each potential project within the designated boundary has or may have the potential for significant environmental effects. After an order for review has been adopted under subpart 3, if a specific project for which an EAW or EIS is not mandatory is proposed within the boundaries of the review area, the RGU may exclude the project from the review process and proceed with its approval by using the following process. The RGU must provide notice of the intended exclusion and the reasons for the intended exclusion in the same manner as for distribution of an EAW pursuant to part 4410.1500. Agencies and interested persons shall have ten days from the date of the notice in the EQB Monitor to file comments with the RGU about the proposed removal of the project from the review. If no adverse comments are received within the comment period, the project is automatically excluded from the review and the prohibitions under part 4410.3100 do not apply to the project without further action by the RGU. If adverse comments are received, the RGU must consider the comments and determine whether to include the project in the review or to exclude it within 30 days of the end of the comment period based on whether the project may have the potential for significant environmental effects, taking into account the comments received and the interaction of the project with other anticipated development in its surrounding area. E. If a specific project will be reviewed through the procedures of this part rather than through the EAW or EIS procedures and the project itself would otherwise require preparation of an EIS pursuant to part 4410.4400 or will comprise at least 50 percent of the geographic area to be reviewed, the RGU must follow the additional procedures of subpart 5a in the review. Subp. 3. Order for review; geographic area designation and specification of development. The RGU shall adopt an order for each review under this part that specifies the boundaries of the geographic area within which the review will apply and specifies the anticipated nature, location, and intensity of residential, commercial, warehousing, and light industrial development and associated infrastructure within those boundaries. The RGU may specify more than one scenario of anticipated development provided that at least one scenario is consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan. At least one scenario must be consistent with any known development plans of property owners within the area. The RGU may delineate subareas within the area, as appropriate to facilitate planning and review of future development, and allocate the overall anticipated development among the subareas. Subp. 4. Environmental analysis document; form and content. The content and format must be similar to that of the EAW, but must provide for a level of analysis comparable to that of an EIS for direct, indirect, and cumulative potential effects typical of urban residential, commercial, warehousing, and light industrial development and associated infrastructure. The content and format must provide for a certification by the RGU that the comprehensive plan requirements of subpart I are met. Subp. 5. Procedures for review. The procedures in items A to H must be used for review under this part. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/?id=4410.3610 4/3/2015 4410.3610 - Minnesota Administrative Rules Page 3 of 6 A. The RGU shall prepare a draft environmental analysis document addressing each of the development scenarios selected under subpart 3 using the standard content and format provided by the EQB under subpart 4. A draft version of the mitigation plan as described under item C must be included. The geographic extent of the analyses of direct, indirect, and cumulative potential effects conducted in preparing the document is not to be limited by the boundaries set in the order for review under subpart 3. The draft document must be distributed and noticed in accordance with part 4410.1500. B. Reviewers shall have 30 days from the date of notice of availability of the draft environmental analysis in the EQB Monitor to submit written comments to the RGU. Reviewers that are governmental units shall be granted a 15-day extension by the RGU upon a written request for good cause. A copy of the request must be sent to the EQB. Comments may address the accuracy and completeness of the information provided in the draft analysis and draft mitigation plan, potential impacts that warrant further analysis, further information that may be required in order to secure permits for specific projects in the future, mitigation measures or procedures necessary to prevent significant environmental impacts within the area when actual development occurs, and the need to analyze additional development scenarios as required by this part. Governmental units shall also state in their comments whether or not they wish to be notified by the RGU upon receipt of applications for specific development projects within the area. C. The RGU shall revise the environmental analysis document based on comments received during the comment period. The RGU shall include in the document a section specifically responding to each timely, substantive comment received that indicates in what way the comment has been addressed. If the RGU believes a request for additional analysis is unreasonable, it may consult with the EQB chair before responding to the comment. The RGU shall include in the document a plan for mitigation specifying the mitigation measures that will be imposed upon future development within the area in order to avoid or mitigate potential environmental impacts. The plan shall contain a description of how each mitigation measure will be implemented, including a description of the involvement of other agencies, if appropriate. D. The RGU shall distribute the revised environmental analysis document, including the plan for mitigation, in the same manner as the draft document and also to any persons who commented on the draft document and to the EQB staff. State agencies and the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities have ten days from the date of receipt of the revised document to file an objection to the document with the RGU. A copy of any letter of objection must be filed with the EQB stab. An objection may be filed only if the agency filing the objection has evidence that the revised document contains inaccurate or incomplete information relevant to the identification and mitigation of potentially significant environmental impacts, that the review has not analyzed sufficient development scenarios as required by this part, or that the proposed plan for mitigation will be inadequate to prevent potentially significant environmental impacts from occurring. E. Unless an objection is filed in accordance with item D, the RGU shall adopt the revised environmental analysis document, including the plan for mitigation, at its first regularly scheduled meeting held 15 or more days after the distribution of the revised document. The RGU shall submit evidence of the adoption of the document and plan for mitigation to the EQB staff and all agencies that have stated that they wish to be informed of any future projects within the area as part of their comments on the draft environmental analysis document. The EQB shall publish a notice of the adoption of the document and the completion of the review process in the EQB Monitor. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/?id=4410.3610 4/3/2015 4410.3610 - Minnesota Administrative Rules Page 4 of 6 Upon adoption of the environmental analysis document, including the plan for mitigation, residential, commercial, warehousing, and light industrial projects and associated infrastructure within the area that are consistent with the assumptions of the document and that comply with the plan for mitigation are exempt from review under parts 4410.1100 to 4410.1700 and 4410.2100 to 4410.2800. F. If an objection is filed with the RGU in accordance with item D, within five days of receipt of the objection the RGU shall consult with the objecting agency about the issues raised in the objection and shall advise the EQB staff of its proposed response to the objection. At the request of the RGU, the objecting agency, the EQB staff, and any other affected agency shall meet with the RGU as soon as practicable to attempt to resolve the issues raised in the objection. Within 30 days after receipt of the objection the RGU shall submit a written response to the objecting agency and the EQB chair. The response shall address each of the issues raised in the objection. The RGU may address an issue by either revising the environmental analysis document or plan for mitigation, or by refuting the comment. G. Within five days of receipt of the RGU's response to the objection, the objecting agency shall advise the EQB chair of whether it accepts the response and withdraws its objection or continues to object. If the objecting agency continues to object, the EQB chair shall place the matter on the agenda of the next regularly scheduled EQB meeting or of a special meeting. H. If the matter is referred to the EQB under item G, the EQB shall determine whether the environmental analysis document, including the plan for mitigation, is adequate, conditionally adequate, or inadequate. If the EQB finds the document conditionally adequate or inadequate, the EQB shall specify the revisions necessary for adequacy. The EQB shall only find the document inadequate if the EQB determines that it contains inaccurate or incomplete information necessary to the identification and mitigation of potentially significant environmental impacts, that the review of development scenarios is not in compliance with this part, or that the proposed plan for mitigation will be inadequate to prevent the occurrence of potentially significant environmental impacts. If the EQB finds the document adequate or conditionally adequate, the RGU shall adopt the document under item E. If the document is found conditionally adequate by the EQB, the RGU shall first revise the document as directed by the EQB. If the EQB finds the document inadequate, the RGU has 30 days to revise the document and circulate it for review in accordance with items D to H. Subp. 5a. Additional procedures required when certain large specific projects reviewed. A. The procedures of this subpart must be followed in addition to those of subpart 5 if a specific project will be reviewed according to this part and the project would otherwise require preparation of an EIS pursuant to part 4410.4400 or will comprise at least 50 percent of the geographic area to be reviewed. B. Prior to final approval of the order for review pursuant to subpart 3, the RGU must conduct a public process to receive comments about the scope of the review. The RGU shall prepare a draft order for review and distribute and provide notice of its availability in the same manner as for an EAW pursuant to part 4410.1500. The draft order for review must include the information specified in subpart 3 and a description of the specific large project or projects to be included in the review comparable to that of a scoping EAW pursuant to part 4410.2100, subpart 2. C. Government units and interested persons shall participate in the public comment process in accordance with part 4410.1600, except that the purpose of the comments is to suggest additional development scenarios and relevant issues to be https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/?id=4410.3610 4/3/2015 4410.3610 - Minnesota Administrative Rules Page 5 of 6 analyzed in the review. Comments may suggest additional development scenarios that include alternatives to the specific large project or projects proposed to be included in the review, including development at sites outside of the proposed geographic boundary. The comments must provide reasons why a suggested development scenario or alternative to a specific project is potentially environmentally superior to those identified in the RGU's draft order. D. The RGU must consider all timely and substantive comments received when finalizing the order for review. The RGU shall apply the criteria for excluding an alternative from analysis found under part 4410.2300, item G, in determining if a suggested additional scenario or alternative to a specific project should be included or excluded and must explain its reasoning in a written record of decision. E. The RGU shall adopt the final order for review within 15 days of the end of the comment period. A copy of the order and the RGU's record of decision must be sent within ten days of the decision to the EQB and to anyone who submitted timely and substantive comments. Subp. 6. Time limit. Unless an objection is filed under subpart 5, item D, the RGU shall adopt the environmental analysis document and plan for mitigation no later than at its first meeting held more than 120 days after the date on which the RGU ordered review under this part. The time limit may be extended upon the agreement of all proposers whose project schedules are affected by the review. Subp. 7. Updating the review. To remain valid as a substitute form of review, the environmental analysis document and the plan for mitigation must be revised if any of the circumstances in items A to H apply. A. Five years have passed since the RGU adopted the original environmental analysis document and plan for mitigation or the latest revision. This item does not apply if all development within the area has been given final approval by the RGU. B. A comprehensive plan amendment is proposed that would allow an increase in development over the levels assumed in the environmental analysis document. C. Total development within the area would exceed the maximum levels assumed in the environmental analysis document. D. Development within any subarea delineated in the environmental analysis document would exceed the maximum levels assumed for that subarea in the document. E. A substantial change is proposed in public facilities intended to service development in the area that may result in increased adverse impacts on the environment. F. Development or construction of public facilities will occur on a schedule other than that assumed in the environmental analysis document or plan for mitigation so as to substantially increase the likelihood or magnitude of potential adverse environmental impacts or to substantially postpone the implementation of identified mitigation measures. G. New information demonstrates that important assumptions or background conditions used in the analysis presented in the environmental analysis document are substantially in error and that environmental impacts have consequently been substantially underestimated. H. The RGU determines that other substantial changes have occurred that may affect the potential for, or magnitude of, adverse environmental impacts. The environmental analysis document and plan for mitigation must be revised by preparing, distributing, and reviewing revised documents in accordance with subpart 5, items D to H, except that the documents must be distributed to all persons on the EAW distribution list under part 4410.1500. Persons not entitled to object to the documents under subpart 5, item D, may submit comments to the RGU suggesting changes in the documents. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/?id=4410.3610 4/3/2015 4410.3610 - Minnesota Administrative Rules Page 6 of 6 Subp. 8. Report to EQB. The EQB chair may ask the RGU to report on the status of actual development within the area, and on the status of implementation of the plan for mitigation. Upon request, the RGU shall report to the EQB chair within 30 days. Statutory Authority: MS s 116D.04: 116D.045 History: 13 SR 1437; 21 SR 1458; 31 SR 539: 31 SR 646: 34 SR 721 Published Electronically: November 30, 2009 Copyright n 2009 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All rights reserved. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/?id=4410.3610 4/3/2015 r CITY OF CHANHASSEN /1+ CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: A J RESOLUTION NO: 2803=98- MOTION BY: ATo1W SECONDED BY: JAdjaW RESOLUTION ORDERING AN ALTERNATE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW FOR THE 2005 METROPOLITAN URBAN SERVICES AREA WHEREAS, in June 1998, the City of Chanhassen adopted its comprehensive plan which contained a land use plan and staging plan that identified the expansion of city utilities (Metropolitan Urban Service Area or MUSA) in five year increments in accordance with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minnesota Statutes Section 473.859); and, WHEREAS, the City recognizes a need to begin planning for the future development of land identified as MUSA 2005 in the comprehensive plan and has received interest form some land owners and developers in the project area; and, WHEREAS, a study of the entire 2005 MUSA area will provide a better framework for making decisions including budgeting for improvements and more informed decision making; and, WHEREAS, an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) is a substitute form of environmental review that replaces an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) or Environmental Impact Statement as provided for in Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.3600 and is a more appropriate form of environmental review that evaluates cumulative impacts over a larger area; and, X WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen is the Responsible Govemmental Unit (RGU) assigned the responsibility of conducting the AUAR; and, WHEREAS, Minnesota Rule 4410.3610 (AUAR Process) Subpart 3 requires an "order for review" to define the review area boundaries and the "anticipated nature, location and intensity" of projected future development; and, WHEREAS, the project area includes approximately 65�cres within the City that is generally bound by Lyman Boulevard on the north, Audubon Road on the west, Pioneer Trail on the south and the southerly extension of Powers Boulevard to Pioneer Trail on the east and further described on the project area map attached as Exhibit A; and, WHEREAS, the anticipated nature, location and intensity of projected future development is consistent with the development pattern stipulated in the current comprehensive plan with the exception of the location of a secondary school within the project area near Lyman Boulevard; and r G Ez WHEREAS, the comprehensive plan land use designations for the project area include a combination of low and medium density residential, office and light industrial and park and open space generally following Bluff Creek. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Chanhassen hereby adopts this Order for Review for the Chanhassen AUAR. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, this I Ph day of August, 2003. ATTEST: 00 TAW Gerhardt, City Manager YES Furlong Ayoue Labatt Peterson Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor NO ABSENT None Lundquist • CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: December 8, 2003 RESOLUTION NO: 2003-106 MOTION BY: _ Avotte SECONDED BY: Peterson RESOLUTION ADOPTING A FINAL ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW (AUAR) AND MITIGATION PLAN FOR THE 2005 METROPOLITAN URBAN SERVICES AREA (MUSA) WHEREAS, on August 11, 2003, the City of Chanhassen, acting as the official Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) approved Resolution 2003-70, an Order for Review requesting the initiation of an AUAR for the 2005 MUSA; and, WHEREAS, on August 19, 2003 the City of Chanhassen held a public informational meeting to obtain public comments on the August 13, 2003 Draft AUAR environmental analysis document; and, WHEREAS, on August 19, 2003 and September 2, 2003, the City of Chanhassen Planning Commission reviewed the August 13, 2003 Draft AUAR environmental analysis document; and, • WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen prepared the September 11, 2003 Draft AUAR environmental analysis document and Mitigation Plan for the 2005 MUSA based on input received from the public and Planning Commission; and, WHEREAS, the September 11, 2003 Draft AUAR environmental analysis document and Mitigation Plan was distributed in accordance with Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Environmental Review Program procedures and published in the EQB Monitor on September 15, 2003 for review and comment; and, WHEREAS, a Notice of Availability of the Draft AUAR environmental analysis document was published in the Chanhassen Villager on September 11, 2003; and, WHEREAS, upon completion of the 30 day review period, as prescribed by Minnesota Rules, ending October 15, 2003, a revised AUAR environmental analysis document and Mitigation Plan was prepared based on comments received; and, WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen distributed the revised AUAR environmental analysis document and Mitigation Plan for the 2005 MUSA in accordance with Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Environmental Review Program procedures; and, WHEREAS, no objections to the revised AUAR environmental analysis document and • Mitigation Plan were filed with the City of Chanhassen within the 10 day objection period as prescribed by Minnesota Rules. • • `J NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Chanhassen hereby adopts the Final AUAR environmental analysis document and Mitigation Plan for the 2005 MUSA. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, this 8'6 /day of December, 2003. ATTEST: odd Gerhardt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlo , YES Furlong Labatt Lundquist Peterson Ayotte NO ABSENT None None �NNES�r9 2 � mQuick Reference: Alternative Urban Areawide Review 1 TA L Q" Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) The AUAR is a planning tool that local governments can use to understand how different development scenarios will affect the environment of their community before the development occurs. The process is designed to look at the cumulative impacts of anticipated development scenarios within a given geographic area. Environmental analysis information from an AUAR can be used to inform local planning and zoning decisions The AUAR process: The AUAR starts with an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). Future development scenarios are reviewed using the EAW to analyze environmental impacts resulting from development choices as well as ways to reduce or eliminate those consequences, (called "mitigations"). Once the AUAR review process is complete, future projects within the AUAR geographic boundary will not require individual EAW and EIS documents as long as these future projects are consistent with the development scenarios analyzed in the completed AUAR, and project proposers implement the mitigation measures required by the AUAR Mitigation Plan. The AUAR is the only environmental review document that must be periodically updated to stay relevant. There are situations where the AUAR cannot be used as a substitute for an EAW or EIS. This information can be found in MN Rules 4410.3610. Relationship to projects: For projects requiring an EAW or EIS that are proposed within the boundaries of an area where an AUAR is in progress but not yet completed, the RGU may review these projects through either the AUAR or EAW procedure. For projects that do not require an EAW or EIS, but are within the geographic boundary of an AUAR, the RGU may exclude it through following a special process, described in Minnesota Rules. Projects proposed that include more than half of the AUAR geographic area or would otherwise require an EIS must go through additional procedures. These additional steps are explained in Minnesota Rules 4410.3610 subpart 2. Why The Grocery Business Is Now Retail's Hottest Niche 7. Whole Foods Market • �� 74oi France Ave. S. Edina Opened April 2012 8. Trader Jae'• • tz. Sam's Club 4270 W. 78th St., 200 American Blvd. W. Bloomington Bloomington Opened October 2012 18. Wal-Mart 9. Target Too American Blvd. E. 2555 W. 79th St. Bloomington Bloomington 14. Lakewinds Food Co-op ` to. Fresh Thyme Farmers Market 642o Lyndale Ave. S. 800l Penn Ave. S. Richfield Bloomington Opened June2014 Slated to open faB 2015 •New stores it. Cub Foods 8421 Lyndale Ave. S. Bloomington Burl Gilyard is senior writer for TUB. Back To Top C iiY= '-- - - � Like what you just read? To receive business news directly in your inboz each Tuesday and Thursday, sign up for our free e-newsletter, Briefcase, and be sure to join the conversation • by commenting below. 0 comments Comments Twin Cities Business Community Login - 11PRecommend [*Share Sort by Best - Start the discussion... I_ SIGN IN WITH 0 0 OR REGISTER WITH DISaUS F] Disqus is a conversation network Disqus never moderates or causal The wiles on this community ere its own. Your email is safe with us. It's only used for moderationandaptional notifications. Don't be a jerk or do anything illegal. Everything is easia, thatway. - -. Read full temis and conditions 0 Be the first to comment. Nothing for you here ... yet. But as you comment with Disqus and follow other Disqus users, you will start to rerviva nntifirAtinna hero as well as a rwNhunnAlirnd fetid of artivitv by vnii and the comments powered by Disqus Page 5 of 6 http://tebmag,com/Industries/Retail-and-Hospitality/Why-The-Grocery-Business-Is-Now-Retail-s-... 3/10/2015 Why The Grocery Business Is Now Retail's Hottest Niche Page 4 of 6 Never Mind Hy-Vee: Grocery Veteran opens New Independent There seems to be little room left in the market for a small, independent grocer. But Joel Ahlstrom isn't discouraged: He opened Longfellow Market on Fast lake Street in south Minneapolis in 2014. Ahlstrom, 70, has been in the grocery business for a mere 53 years and also operates Riverside Market in Isanti. He says that business is improving, but acknowledges he's already changed his business model from a conventional grocery store to that of a natural and organic retailer. -rhat's what the neighborhood is looking for," Ahlstrom says. "I've had this thing in the works for years. It's kind of a dream to do a store and do it right I want to re-create the old-fashioned neighborhood grocery store. That was my goal." Ahlstrom says he isn't worried about the big dogs taking a bite out of business at his 18,000-square-foot store." Phis is not a Hy-Vee neighborhood. R just has a nice feel to it, it's a more friendly place," Ahlstrom says. 'A lot of my shoppers would never darken the door of a Cub or a Wal-Mart." Who's who in the Grocery Business Kowalsk is Markets Woodbury -based Kowalski's Excelsior store will be its Loth. Christiansen says revenue for 2014 will end up at $200 million to $250 million. L.unds/Byerly's Edina -based Lund Food Holdings Inc. operates 28local stores: L3 L.unds locations, 13 Byerfy's stores, one Rainbow (Plymouth) and Lunds & Byerlys Kitchen in Wayzata. Jerry's Enterprises The privately held Edina -based Jerr/s Enterprises operates two local Jerry's Foods in Edina and Eden Prairie, with a third soon to open in Woodbury. Jerry's also is a large Cub Foods franchisee. Cub Foods Eden Prairie -based Supervalu Inc. owns Cub Foods, which has 66 corporately owned and franchised locations in the Twin Cities. Supervalu paid approximately $35 million to acquire in former Rainbow stores, which became to new Cub locations. Whole Foods Fortune 5m retailer Whole Foods Market Inc., based in Austin, Texas, will grow to seven metro locations when it opens its Woodbury store in 2017. Aldi Deep -discount chain Aldi, based in Batavia, I➢., opened its first local store in Inver Grove Heights in 2003 and now has 25 across the metro. Trader Joe's Boutique grocer trader Joe's, based in Monrovia, Calif., opened its first local outpost in 2006 in St. Louis Park and now has seven metro stores. Itoundy's Roundy's Inc., a $4 billion grocer based in Milwaukee, announced in May 20t4 that it was selling 18 Rainbow stores in the Twin Cities for $65 million. It's still trying to land subleases for nine dosed stores. Orange You Glad You're In Edina? The region surrounding Southdale is gmund-zero for the grocery expansion wars. These are the combatants: i. Kowalski's Market 5327 Lyndale Ave. S. Minneapolis 2. Aldi 63to Penn Ave. S. Richfield 3. Lands 6228 Penn Ave. S. Richfield 4. Cub Foods 6775 York Ave. S. Edina 5• SuperTarget 700o York Ave. S. Edina 6. Byerly's 7171 France Ave. S. Edina New store opened September 2014 http://tcbmag.com/Industries/Retail-and-Hospitality/Why-The-Grocery-Business-Is-Now-Retail-s-... 3/ 10/2015 ��,�� UES I NERS Consulting Group, Inc. March 30, 2015 Kate Aanenson, AICP DRAFT For REVIEW Community Development Director CFrY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR A VISIONING STUDY Based on your request, we are pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional services for conducting a visioning study in association with the Quadrant and the adjacent parcels. For purposes of this letter, the "Quadrant" will refer to the contiguous 118 acres currently owned by several private parties. Study Background and Intent A 118 acre tract of undeveloped land is located in the City of Chanhassen near Lyman and Powers Boulevards near TH 212. The area is owned by several private parties with development designated for mixed land uses including a retail center. Although general land use designations have been suggested, formal approvals for development have not been obtained from the City of Chanhassen. The visioning exercise and outcome is intended to inform elected policy makers and appointed officials along with city staff as to the values and priorities presented by the diverse stakeholder groups who have interest in future development of the Quadrant. Visioning for the purpose of this exercise, is intended to focus upon several topics to include; • Composition of development uses • Circulation including vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle • Open space functions • Edge treatments and landscaping • Programmable civic areas and amenities • Development character, scale and aesthetics Input garnered from the various interested parties will be used to inform the Quadrant and related development projects during their municipal approvals. Approach Meaningful facilitation of the representative stakeholder groups will be paramount to achieve the study intent. To that end, meetings or other means will occur with individual groups to seek input from those individuals who have shown interest or are thought to present valuable perspectives for the proposed development. www.srfconsulting.com One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 1 Minneapolis, MN 554474443 1 763.475.0010 Fax: 763.475.2429 An Equal Opportunity Employer - 2 - March 30, 2015 Each of the meetings, work sessions or active surveys will employ precedent project images that portray alternative approaches to related project elements. This technique will allow participants to compare and contrast how varying built projects responded to similar project elements. Participants will be asked to provide preference or priority for the images, and when possible, to provide subjective comments as to suggested changes or improvements that may benefit the Chanhassen application. Identified stakeholder groups and their engagement follow; Current development parcel property owners -one to two facilitated meetings dependent upon their willingness to participate together Adjacent neighborhood -one facilitated meeting, likely to be held late afternoon or early evening Community at large -web based survey (see below) Chamber of Commerce/Downtown Chanhassen Business Community -one facilitated meeting, likely to be held early morning consistent with business owner availability Elected/Appointed Officials -one facilitated meeting, likely a joint work session of the City Council and the Planning Commission Web based survey -A web based survey such as Mind Mixer or Survey Monkey would be made available to solicit input from interested parties for a defined period of about 4 weeks. Participant input would be monitored and recorded. Study End Product Stakeholder input received from the various facilitated meetings along with the web based sampling will be summarized in a concise report and made available to the city for use by staff, the City Council and Planning Commission. ASSUMPTIONS Base mapping and concepts plans for parcel development will be provided by the city and will be used for any necessary mapping. Work sessions with staff will be the primary source of input to guide decision making. SCHEDULE We will complete this work within a mutually agreed -upon time schedule. Upon a formal notice to proceed, work would commence with a staff work session/kick off meeting. It is assumed that baseline work tasks would occur in April, followed by primary stakeholder group input during May and early June. A summary document would be made available in late June or early July. t _ 3 - March 30. 2015 BASIS OF PAYMENT/BUDGET We propose to be reimbursed for our services on an hourly basis for the actual time expended. Direct project expenses, such as printing, supplies, reproduction, etc., will be billed at cost, and mileage will be billed at the current allowable IRS rate for business miles. Invoices are submitted on a monthly basis for work performed during the previous month. Payment is due within 30 days. Based on our understanding of the project and our scope of services, we estimate the not -to -exceed cost of our services to be $30,000, which includes both time and expenses. The exact allocation of related consultant staff time toward specific work tasks and stakeholder meetings will be arrived upon in joint discussions between city staff and the consultant project manager. CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF SERVICES It is understood that if the scope or extent of work changes, the cost will be adjusted accordingly. Before any out -of -scope work is initiated, however, we will submit a budget request for the new work and will not begin work until we receive authorization from you. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS The attached Standard Terms and Conditions (Attachment A) together with this proposal for professional services constitute the entire agreement between the Client and SRF Consulting Group, Inc. and supersede all prior written or oral understandings. This agreement may only be amended, supplemented, modified or canceled by a duly executed written instrument. NOTICE TO PROCEED A signed copy of this proposal or a separate letter of authorization, either mailed or emailed to our office, will serve as our notice to proceed. The email address is bwamer@srfconsulting.com. 41 -4- March 30, 2015 We sincerely appreciate your consideration of this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Barry J. Warner, FASLA AICP Senior Vice President Attachment A — Standard Terms and Conditions APPROVED: (signature) Name Title Date This cost proposal is valid for a period of 90 days. SRF reserves the right to adjust its cost estimate after 90 days from the date of this proposal SRF PProposal numbers issued by marketing [Document ll ATTACHMENT A STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS The Standard Tema and Conditions together with the attached Proposal fa Professional Services constitute the entire Agreement between the CLIENT and SRF Consulting Group, Inc. ("SRF) and supersede all prior written or oat understandings. This Agreement may only be amended, supplemented, modified, or canceled by a duly executed written instrument. 1. STANDARD OF CARE a. The standard of care for all professional services performed or fimushed by SRF under this Agreement will be the care and skill ordinarily used by members of SRF's profession practicing under similar circurmtances at the same time and in the same locality. SRF makes w warrarrties, expressed or implied, under the Agreement or otherwise, in connection with SRF's service. b. The CLIENT shall be responsible for, and SRF may rely upon, the accuracy and completeness of all requirements, progams, instructions, reports, data and other information firmshed by CLIENT to SRF pursuant to this Agreement. SRF may use such requirements, reports, data, and information in perfonrring or famishing services miler this Agreement. 2. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR All duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the CLIENT and SRF and not for the benefit of any other party. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with m a cause of action in favor of a third party against either the CLIENT or SRF. SRF's services under this Agreement are being performed solely for the CLIENT's benefit, and no other entity shall have any claim against SRF because of this Agreement or the performance or nonperformance of services hereunder. 3. PAYMENT TO SRF Invoices will be prepared in accordance with SRF's standard invoicing practices and will be submitted to the CLIENT by SRF monthly, unless otherwise agreed. Invoices are dux and payable widen thirty (30) days of receipt If the CLIENT fails to make any payment due SRF for services and expenses whin forty-five (45) days after receipt of SRF's invoice thereafter, the amounts due SRF will be increased at the rate of 1-1/2% per month (or the maximum rate of interest permitted by law, if less). In addition, SRF may, after giving seven days written notice to the CLIENT, suspend services under this Agreement until SRF has been paid in full of amounts due for services, expenses, and other related charges. 4. OPINION OF PROBABLE F CONSTRUCTION COST Any opinions of costs prepared by SRF represent its judgment m a design professional and we furnished for the general guidance of the CLIENT. Since SRF has w control over the war of labs, materials, market condition, or competitive bidding, SRF does not guarantee the accuracy of such cost opinions as compared to Contractor or supplier bids or actual cost to the CLIENT. 5. INSURANCE SRF will maintain insurance coverage for Workers' Conpensatiau, General Liability, Automobile Liability and Professional liability and will provide certificates ofinsmance to the CLIENT upon request. 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND ALLOCATION OF RISK a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, SRF agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the CLIENT, their officers, directors and employees against all damges, liabilities or costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees and defense costs) to the extent caused by SRF's negligent acts under this Agreement and that of its subconsuRants a anyone for whom SRF is legally liable. b. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the CLIENT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless SRF, their officers, directors and employees against all darneges, liabilities or costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees and defense costs) to the extent cased by the CLIENT's negligent acts under this Agreement and that of its subconsultants or anyone for whom the CLIENT is legally liable. 7. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT Either party may at any time, mpm seven days prior written notice to the other party, terminate this Agreement Upon such temnim5on, the CLIENT shag pay to SRF all amounts owing to SRF under this Agreement, for all work performed up to the effective date of termination 8. OWNERSHIP AND REUSE OF DOCUMENTS All documents prepared or furnished by SRF pursuant to this Agreement are instruments is of service, and SRF shall retain an ownership and property interest therein. Reuse of any such documents by the CLIENT shall be at CLIENT's sole risk; and the CLIENT agrees to Pagc 1 of 2 (Standard Terns and Candiucns) Rev: August 1& 2011 1 midenmufy, and hold SRF harmless from all claims, damages, and expenses including attorney's fees arising out of such reuse of documents by the CLIENT or by others acting through the CLIENT. a. Copies of Documents that may be relied upon by the CLIENT are limited to the Printed copes (also known as hard copes) that are signed or sealed by SRF. Files in electronic media format of text, data, graphics, Or of other types that are furnished by SRF to the CLIENT are only for convenience of the CLIENT. Any conclusion or information obtained or derived from such electronic files will be at the user's sole risk. b. When transferring documents in electronic media format, SRF makes no representations as to long -tern comipatibility, usability, or readability of documents resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those used by SRF at the beginning of this Assignment. c. If there is a discrepancy between the electronic files and the hard copes, the bard copes gmem. d. Because data stored in electronic media format can deteriorate or be modified inadvertently or otherwise without authorization of this date's creator, the party receiving electronic files agrees that it will perform acceptance tests or procedures within sixty (60) days, after which the receiving party shall be deemed to have accepted the data thus transferred Any erors detected within the sixty (60) day acceptance period will be corrected by the party delivering the electronic files. SRF shall not be responsible to maintain documents stored in electronic media format after acceptance by the CLIENT. 10. FORCE MAJEURE SRF shall not be liable for any loss or damage due to failure or delay in rendering any service called for under this Agreement resulting from any cause beyond SRF's reasonable control. 11. ASSIGNMENT 12. Neither party shall assign its rights, interests or obligations under this Agreement without the express written consent of the other pany. This Agreement shall bind, and the benefits thereof shall inure to the respective parties hereto, their legal representatives, executors, adrm ustrators, successors, and assigns. 13. SEVERABILITY AND WAIVER OF PROVISIONS Any provisions or part of the Agrcemerd held to be void or unenforceable under any laws or regulations shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall co ntimre to be valid and binding upon the CLIENT and SRF, who agree that the Agreement shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as Possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision Non -enforcement of any Provision by either party shall not constitute a waiver of that provision, nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement. 14. SURVIVAL All provisions of this Agreement regarding Ownership of Documents and Reuse of Documents, Electronic Media provisions, Indemnification and Allocation of Risk, and Dispute Resolution shall remain m effect. 15. DISPUTE RESOLUTION If negotiation in good faith fails to resolve a dispute within the thirty (30) days of notice of the dispute, or time period specified by applicable law, then tine parties agree that each dispute, claim or controversy arising from or related to this Agreement or the relationships which result from this Agreement shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to initiating legal or equitable actions by either party. Unless the patties agree otherwise, the mediation shall be in accordance with the Commercial Mediation Procedures of the American Arbitration Association then currently in effect. A request for mediation shall be filed in writing with the American Arbitration Association and the other party. No legal or equitable action my be instituted for a period of ninety (90) days from the filing of the request for mediation unless a longer period of time is provided by agreement of the parties. Cost of mediation shall be shared equally between the parties. Mediation shall be held in a location muhnally agreed upon by the parties. The parties shall memorialize any agreement resulting from the mediation in a mediated settlement agreement, which agreement shall be enforceable as a settlement in any court having jurisdiction thereof This Agreement is to be governed by the law of the principal place of business of SRF. Page 2 of 2 (Standard Terms and Conditions) Rev: August 18, 2011 Budget 2005 AUAR HKGi Invoice 5/6/2003 805.52 6/5/2003 7,411.49 6/30/2003 17,499.28 9/9/2003 19,820.20 10/7/2003 3,436.36 10/7/2003 29,199.83 10/17/2003 4,655.04 12/4/2003 1,830.93 12/4/2003 14,540.51 a/7/2003 14,919.20 8131 /2003 $114,395.47 Contact Allocation budget code 400-4005-4300 $104,490 Acres % D Degler 67.3 11.9% $13,263.23 $114,395 $111,456 less T& C work G Degler 80 14.1% $15,766.10 $2,939 Dorsey 40 7.1% $7,883.05 $4,072 J Fox 40 7.1% $7,883.05 Fox family 51.1 9.0% $10,070.60 T&C 1 87.42 15.5% $17,228.41 cc 8-8-05 T & C 2 35 6.2% Peterson 120 21.2% -$6,89z.6-7 Qe 649.151 Laurent 3.47 0.6% $68-3:85 Theship Rosales 1.66 0.3% $327.15 St. Martin 6.13 1.1% $1,208.08 Laurent 33_47 5.9% $6,596.14 565.55 100% $111,456.47 Revised 4/28/06 cultural wetlands $2,939 $4,072 Leasi ED 800t.805.921 R02 www.reddevelopment.com RED DEVELOPMENT, LLC One East Washington St. Suite 300 Phoenix. AZ 85004 Chapter VI SALES POTENTIAL AND SUPPORTABLE GLA The Chan-212 Convenience Goods and Shopping Goods trade areas have the potential to support more GLA than can be accommodated at the proposed development. This creates the enviable situation where the developer can choose from a wide variety of retail stores to establish its market position. Supportable GLA Estimated Chan-212 supportable GLA by retail store type is contained in Table 27. In almost every category, supportable space exceeds the median store size. These estimates of supportable square feet are likely to be understated due to the high trade area household income. Also, there are likely to be a large proportion of high income and high asset households where there are few constraints on discretionary spending. Table 27 CHAN-212 SHOPPING GOODS SUPPORTABLEG14 BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (Gross Leasable Area) Store Sim Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 Low Median Huh CONVFNDNCEGOODS Food Stores Grocery Stores 94,087 113,202 135,261 31,676 52,500 65,888 Supemsrkets 92,189 110,915 132,528 31,245 52,419 69,462 Convenience Food 2,913 3,507 4,190 1,349 2,095 5,323- Specialty Food Stores 7,650 9,205 11,000 1,188 2,400 6,000 Meat Markets 2,529 3,036 3,631 1,130 2,215 18,080 Baked Goods 524 632 756 1,191 1,834 3,285 Confectionery and Nut Stores 409 494 591 702 1,240 2,047 All Other Specialty Food stores 1,095 1,315 1,570 1,069 2,200 8,007 Other Convenience Goods Drug & Proprietary Stores 20,480 24,643 29,443 8,280 11,700 23,714 Hardware 7,795 9,394 lull 5,638 13,831 27,743 Liquor 19,819 23,945 28,491 1,305 Z856 7,210 Florist 2,879 3,463 4,137 766 1,600 5,396 Food/Health Supplement Stores 1,400 1,684 2,012 1,2M 1,234 1,968 Food Service Full -Service Restaurants 72,594 88,319 106,481 2,000 4,500 9,775 -Lunited Service Restaurants 41,438 50,415 60,783 1,335 3,000 3,400 Cafeterias 3,528 4.2% 5,170 517 1,073 10,049 Snack & Beverage Places 14,733 17,927 21,613 850 1,500 Z495 Ice Cream& Soft Serve 1,702 2,071 2,492 902 1,148 I,570 Finan Yogurt 275 340 405 1,031 1,282 1,700 Doughnut Shops 3,518 4,7n 5,159 744 1,2W Z153 Bagel Shops 904 978 1,178 2,000 2,388 3,40D Coffee Shops 4,698 5,713 6,888 881 1,500 2,000 Cookie Shops 138 170 203 220 602 797 Other Snack Shops 2.456 2,986 3,6D0 850 1.578 2,495 Gasoline Sas Stations/Coay. Gas/Convenience Food Stores 6,619 8,052 9,708 1,500 2,933 6,121 42 Table 27 (continued) CHAN-212 SHOPPINGGOODS SUPPORTABLEGLA BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (Grose Lensable Area) Store S ze Merchandise Category 2015 2020 21725 Low Median Huh SHOPPING GOODS General Merchandise Department Stores line[. leased depts.) Discount Stores 216,484 263,376 317,536 57,720 94.788 141,986 Department Stores 157,156 191,2W 230,520 89,641 148,796 243,167 Other General Merchandise Stores Warehouse Clubs and Supercenters 270a14 328,758 396,362 90,134 151,990 217,447 Dollar Stores 23.218 28,250 34,055 2,726 8,000 13,788 Miscellaneous General Merchandise 47,148 57,360 69,156 3,200 8,400 11,212 Apparel & Accessories Clothing Stores Mena and Boys 10,050 12,223 14,732 2,002 4,000 5.635 Womens Clothing 49,115 59,755 72,040 2.074 4,200 8,740 Children's & Infant 18,929 23,029 27,767 1,490 3,912 6,000 Family Clothing 87,935 106,862 128,835 2,374 8,000 28,228 Clothing Accessories Stores 4,659 5,666 6,831 918 1,400 2,001 Other Clothing Stores 13,902 16,909 20,389 1,060 2,300 8,2M Shoe Stores Men's 921 1,117 1,348 903 1,640 2,186 Women's 1,759 7,137 2,574 1,309 2,384 3,158 Children's & Infant 424 514 621 1,490 3,912 6,000 Family Shoe Stores 28,063 34,143 41,166 2,021 3,388 10,234 Athletic Footwear 11,931 14,514 17,491 035 3.2M 11,314 Furniture & Home Furnishings Furniture 74,612 90,773 109,442 3,108 7,927 36,712 Floor Coverings 32,742 39,836 48,022 1,229 3,593 7,819 Window Treatment Stores 3,510 4,267 5,143 1,489 4,905 9934 All Other Home Furnishings Stores 49.114 59,749 72,040 2.868 3,M 6-%0 Electronics & Appliances Stores Household Appliance Stores 26,255 31,938 38,505 2,349 4,000 7,563 Radio, TV& Electronics Stores 99,203 120,693 145,517 1,208 3,406 10,451 Computers, Software, Music, & Other Electronics 15,241 18,543 22,357 997 3,388 25,600 Other Shopping Goods Sporting Goods 81,035 98,585 118,8W 2,238 7-%0 44,116 General Line Sporting Goods 33,155 40,335 48,625 3,765 5,850 28,128 Specialty Line Sporting Goods 42,564 51,787 62,431 1,097 Z449 4,356 Book Stores &Newsdealenr 28,394 34,544 41,650 2,428 4,542 29.974 Stationery Stores and Office Supply 16,043 19,520 23,531 585 1,033 2,247 Musical Instrument & Supplies 11,254 13,696 16,513 Z432 7,324 26,094 Jewelry Stores 28,332 34,471 41,560 790 1,450 3,410 Hobby, Toy & Game 25.257 30,726 37,051 1,604 4,050 25,961 Camera & Photographic Supply 6,695 8,149 9.822 816 2,20D 5,965 Gil, Novelty & Souvenirs 33,567 40,827 49,227 2,369 4.422 7,015 Luggage & Leather Goods 3.065 3,735 4,500 1,193 2,300 3,102 Sewing, Needlework & Piece Goods 23,330 28.390 34,210 2,678 12" 19,299 Pet Stores 22,100 26,985 32,420 1,847 3,200 12,398 Art Dealers 3,276 3,982 4,800 675 1,434 2,401 Optical Goods Stores 12,703 15,452 18,631 885 1,561 4,068 Pre -Recorded Tapes, Compact Discs 3,048 3,709 4,470 1,308 3,426 IZ753 Cosmetics, Beauty Supplies & Perfume 9,409 11,447 13,800 1,102 1,953 6.235 Ali Other Health & Personal Care 18,753 22,811 27,505 697 1,786 3,084 43 I I I Table 27 (continued) CEAN-212 SROPPINGGOODS SUPPORTABLEGIA BYMFRCHANDSECATEGORY (Grose 1<asable Area) Store Size Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 Low Median High OTHER RErAR, STORES Building Materials & Caarden Supplies Budding Materials & Supplies Stores Home Centers 91,060 110,786 133,566 8,981 95,173 135,833 Paint, Class & Wallpaper 9,564 11,636 14,031 2,348 3,533 5,028 Lawn & Garden Equipment Outdoor Power Equipment 25,590 31,140 37,540 N/A N/A N/A Retail Nurseries, Lawn & Carden 72,890 88,680 106,920 N/A 15,000 N/A Motor Vehicles & Pars Dealers Auto Parts & Accessories Stores 25,010 30,425 36,685 2,232 6,500 13,000 Tire Dealers 18,900 22,995 27,725 3,514 6,944 12,014 SERVICES Personal Care Services Beauty Shops 16,084 9,111 10,879 900 1,400 3,480 Nail Salons 2,027 1,145 1,373 773 1,200 1,807 Diet & Weight Reducing Services 1,320 747 893 I'M 1,856 3,130 Other Personal Care Services 2,509 1,417 1,691 703 1,488 4,128 Drycleaning & Laundry Services Drycleaning & Laundry Services (emept coin -op.) 4,367 9,880 11,807 1,039 1,608 2,731 Other Personal Services Child Day Care Services 14,750 16,710 19,960 3,059 5,050 7,495 Photographic Studios 2,156 2,440 2,916 990 1,866 2,550 Veteranarian Services 9,849 11,151 13,329 1,346 2,122 2,701 Pet Care 3,387 3,827 4,560 900 1,200 1,500 Rental and Leasing Formalwear and Costume Rental 482 729 871 763 1,046 1,773 Home Health Equipment Rental 1,664 2,516 3,008 1,200 1,600 3,480 Recreation Physical Fitness Facdites 67,750 76,725 91,663 1,433 6,448 32,170 Health Care Offices of Physicians Offices of Physicians 69,703 83,863 100,202 969 1,652 4,008 Offices of Dentists 32,197 19,368 23,145 1,090 1,700 3,970 Offices of Chiropractors 4,649 2,797 3,342 1,090 1,600 3,9M Offices of Optometrists 1,764 3,183 3,805 1,074 1,620 4,347 Offices of Mental Health Practitioners 2,391 4,316 5,157 1,090 1,800 3,970 Physical & Occupational Therapists 4,006 7,232 8,641 1,090 1,600 3,970 Source: McComb&cup, Ltd Shopping Center Size Sales potential and supportable square feet provide an indication of shopping center potential. Shopping center size will depend on tenant interest and the number of anchor stores. The potential GLA by store category ranges from 825,000 square feet to 1,120,000 square feet, as shown in Table 28. Convenience goods ranges from 105,000 square feet to 135,000 square feet depending on sunennar et size an num er o other retailers. Convenience includes stores where 44 convenience is a primary consideration as they are visited on a regular basis. Examples include supermarkets, drug, liquor, hardware, and other stores and services. Table 28 CHAN-212 POTENTIAL GROSS 1EASABLEARE4 Cross Leasable Area Store Category Low High Convenience Goods 105,000 135,000 Shopping Goods Anchor Stores 120,000 220,000 Junior Anchors 220,000 315,000 Inlne Stores 110,000 180,000 Subtotal 450,000 715,000 Food Service Restaurants 20,000 30,000 Fast Food 15,000 20,000 Subtotal 35,000 50,000. Services 20,000 30,000 Destination Stores Health Club 50,000 60,000 Home Center 115,000 115,000 Cinema 50,000 60,000 Subtotal 215,000 235,000 Total 825,000 1,165,000 source: McComb Croup, Ltd Shopping goods retailers are stores where comparison shopping is a common part of the shopping trip. Department stores typically anchor these shopping centers. Potential anchor store GLA ranges from 120,000 square feet to 220,000 square feet. Junior anchor retailers are various size stores, ranging in size from 10,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet, also adding the center's drawing power. Junior anchor GLA could range from 220,000 square feet to 315,000 square feet. Inline, small store tenants could range from I10,000 square feet to 180,000 square feet. Total shopping goods stores could range from 450,000 square feet to 715,000 square feet. Food service establishments are expected to range from 35,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet. Services of various types could range from 20,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet. Destination retailers like health clubs, home centers, and cinemas, could total 215,000 square feet to 235,000 square feet if all three located at Chan-212. It is possible that not all the anticipated potential tenants will located at Chan-212 indicating that the shopping center is likely to be between 800,000 square feet and 1,000,000 square feet. 45 Sales Potential Estimated sales potential by retail store type is contained in Table 29. These estimates of sales potential are likely to be understated due to the high trade area household income. Table 29 CHAN-212 SALES POTENTIAL B Y MERCHANDIS E CATEIGORY (In Thousands of Dollars) Merchandise Cateaory 2015 2020 2025 CONVINIINCEGOODS Food Stores Grocery Stores $ 43,280 $ 52,073 $ 62,220 Supermarkets 42,407 51,021 60,963 Convenience Food 874 1,052 1,257 Specialty Food Stores 1,530 1,841 2,200 Meat Markets 569 683 817 Baked Goods 131 158 189 Confectionery and Nut Stores 131 158 189 All Other Specialty Food Stores 219 263 314 Other Convenience Goode Drug & Proprietary Stores $ 9,421 $ 11,336 S 13,544 Hardware 1,442 1,736 2,074 liquor 7,432 8,942 10,684 Florist 547 658 786 Food/Health Supplement Stores 350 421 503 Food Service Full -Service Restaurants $ 26,134 S 31,795 $ 38,333 Limited Service Restaurants 16,575 20,166 24,313 Cafeterias 829 1,009 1,215 Snack & Beverage Places 4,420 5,378 6,494 lee Cream & Soft Serve 553 673 810 Frozen Yogurt - 55 68 81 Doughnut Shops 774 941 1,135 Bagel Shops 221 269 324 Coffee Shops 1,979 2,285 2,755 Cookie Shops 55 68 81 Other Snack Shops 894 1,075 1,2% Gasoline Svs Stations/Cony Gas/Convenience Food Stores $ 917M $ 11,273 $ 13,591 ER Table 29 (continued) CHAN-212 SALES POTENTIAL BYMERCHANDISECATEGORY (In Thousands of Dollars) Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 SHOPPING GOODS General Merchandise Department Stores (Incl. leased depts.) Discount Stores S 54,121 S 65,844 S 79,384 Department Stores 35,360 43,020 51,867 Other General Merchandise Stores Warehouse Clubs and Supercenters S 121,601 S 147,941 S 178,363 Dollar Stores 5,108 6,215 7,492 Miscellaneous General Merchandise 11,787 14,340 17,289 Apparel & Accessories Clothing Stores Mena and Boys S 2,211 $ 2,689 S 3,241 Womns Clothing 9,823 11,951 14,408 Children's & Infant 4,543 5,527 6,664 Family Clothing 22,837 27,784 33,497 Clothing Accessories Stores 1,351 1,643 1,981 Other Clothing Stores 3,684 4,481 5,403 Shoe Stores Men's $ 267 S 324 $ 391 Women's 475 577 695 Children's & Infant 123 149 180 Family Shoe Stores 4,911 5,975 7,204 Athletic Footwear 2,088 2,540 3,061 Furniture & Home Furnishings Furniture S 19,399 S 23,601 S 28,455 Floor Coverings 7,367 8,963 10,805 Window Treatment Stores 737 896 1,080 All Other Home Furnishings Stores 8,595 10,456 12,607 Electronics & Appliances Stores Household Appliance Stores S 7,220 $ 8,783 S 10,589 Radio, TV& Electronics Stores 29,761 36,208 43,655 Computers, Software, Music, & Other Electronics 8,840 10,755 12,967 Other Shopping Goods Sporting Goods S 16,207 $ 19,717 $ 23,772 General Line Sporting Goods 6,631 8,067 9,725 Specialty Line Sporting Goods 9,577 11,652 14,047 Book Stores & Newsdealers 4,543 5,527 6,664 Stationery Stores and Office Supply 6,016 7,320 8,824 Musical Instrument & Supplies 2,701 3,287 3,963 Jewelry Stores 9,208 11,203 13,507 Hobby, Toy & Gam 4,420 5,377 6,484 Camera & Photographic Supply 1,841 2,241 2,701 Gift, Novelty & Souvenirs 5,035 6,124 7,384 Luggage & Leather Goods 613 747 900 Sewing, Needlework & Piece Goods 2,333 2,839 3,421 Pet Stores 4,420 5,377 6,484 Art Dealers 737 896 1,080 Optical Goods Stores 3,684 4,481 5,403 Pre -Recorded Tapes, Compact Discs 701 853 1,028 Cosmetics, Beauty Supplies & Perfume 3,011 3,663 4,416 All Other Health & Personal Care 5,157 6273 7,564 47 Table 29 (continued) CHAN-212 SALES POTENTIAL BY MERCHANDISE CATEGORY (In Thousands of Dollars) Merchandise Category 2015 2020 2025 OTHER RETAIL STORES Building Materials & Garden Supplies Building Materials & Supplies Stores Home Centers $ 31,871 $ 38,775 $ 46,748 Paint, Glass & Wallpaper 2,152 2,618 3,157 Lawn & Carden Equipment Outdoor Power Equipment 2,559 3,114 3,754 Retail Nurseries, lawn & Garden 7,289 8,868 10,692 Motor Vehicles & Parts Dealers Auto Pans & Accessories Stores $ 5,002 $ 6,085 $ 7,337 Tire Dealers 3,780 4,599 5,545 SERVICES Personal Care Services Beauty Shops $ 3,056 $ 1,731 $ 2,067 Nail Salons 223 126 151 Diet & Weight Reducing Services 198 112 134 Other Personal Cam Services 439 248 296 Drycleaning & Laundry Services Drycleaning & Laundry Services (e)xept coin -op.) $ 655 $ 1,482 $ 1,771 Other Personal Services Child Day Care Services $ 1,475 $ 1,671 $ 1,996 Photographic Studios 593 671 802 Veteranarian Services 2,216 2,509 2,999 Pet Care 254 287 342 Rental and Leasing Formalwear and Costume Rental $ 176 $ 266 $ 318 Home Health Equipment Rental 416 629 752 Recreation Physical Fitness Facilites $ 5,420 $ 6,138 $ 7,333 Health Care Offices of Physicians Offices of Physicians $ 24,884 $ 29,939 $ 35,772 Offices of Dentists 11,108 6,682 7,985 Offices of Chiropractors 1,604 965 1,153 Offices of optometrists 732 1,321 1,579 Offices of Mental Health Practitioners 825 1,489 1,779 Physical & Occupational Therapists 1,382 2,495 Z981 Source' McGDrnb Group, Ltd 48 Chanhassen, MN Code of Ordinances Page 1 of I Sec. 20-517. - General concept plan. (a) In order to receive guidance in the design of a PUD prior to submission of a formal application, an applicant may submit a concept plan for review and comment by the planning commission and city council. Submission of a concept plan is optional but is highly recommended for large PUDs. In order for the review to be of most help to the applicant, the concept plan should contain such specific information as is suggested by the city. Generally, this information should include the following information appropriate to the type of development, e.g., commercial, industrial or residential: (1) Approximate building areas, pedestrian ways and road locations; (2) Height, bulk and square footage of buildings; (3) Type, number or square footage or intensities of specific land uses; (4) Number of dwelling units; (5) Generalized development plan showing areas to be developed or preserved; and (6) Staging and timing of the development. (b) The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be filed with the city before the staff commences review. Approval of the concept statement shall not obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district. (c) The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures: (1) The developer meets with the city staff to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan, together with all supporting data. (3) The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and make recommendations to the city council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official newspaper at least ten days prior to the hearing. Written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten days prior thereto to owners of land within 500 feet of the boundary of the property and an on -site notification sign erected. (4) Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning commission, the city council shall consider the proposal. The council may comment on the concept plan. (Ord. No. 80, Art V, § 18(5-18-6(2)), 12-15-86, Ord. No. 377, § 72, 5-24.04; Ord. No. 409, § 3, 1-9-06, Ord. No. 542, § 3, 6-25-12) about:blank 11/17/2014 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard • Chanhassen, MN 55317 • T: (952) 227-1118 • wmi.ci.chanhassen.mmus The Cl-Ly ®f Chanhassen, Minnesota 200 Citizen SurveyTM tlatianal Research Center, Inc. 3005 3& St. • Boulder, CO 80301 • "i : (s03j 44 -7853 • F. (303) 444-1145 r*�,w.n c.com F The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS Survey Background.......................................................................................... 1 About The National Citizen Survey.................................................................................. 1 Understandingthe Results.................................................................................................. 1 Profileof Chanhassen...................................................................................... 3 CommunityLife............................................................................................... 4 Qualityof Life.................................................................................................................... 4 Ratings of Community Characteristics................................................................................ 4 Perceptionsof Safety.......................................................................................................... 4 CommunityParticipation................................................................................................... 4 LocalGovernment........................................................................................... 5 PublicTrust....................................................................................................................... 5 Service Provided by Chanhassen......................................................................................... 5 The City of Chanhassen Employees.................................................................................... 5 AdditionalQuestions....................................................................................... 6 ___ Son�maryReport..____ __. The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey SURVEY BACKGROUND About The National Citizen Survey' The National Citizen Survey' (The NCS') is a collaborative effort between National Research Center, Inc. (NRC) and the International City/County Management Association (ICMA). Understanding the Results Survey Administration Following the mailing of a pre -survey notification postcard to a random sample of 1,200 households, surveys were mailed to the same residences approximately one week later. A reminder letter and a new survey were sent to the same households after two weeks. Of the mailed postcards, 57 were undeliverable due to vacant or "not found" addresses. Completed surveys were received from 513 residents, for a response rate of 45%. Typically, the response rates obtained on citizen surveys range from 25% to 40%. It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a "level of confidence" (or margin of error). The 95 percent confidence level for this survey of 1,200 residents is generally no greater than plus or minus 5 percentage points around any given percent reported for the entire sample. The results were weighted to reflect the demographic profile of all residents in the City of Chanhassen. (For more information on the survey methodology, see Appendix B in the Report of Results. A copy of the survey materials can he found in Appendix C of the Report of Results.) Use of the "Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor" Response Scale The scale on which respondents are asked to record their opinions about service and community, quality is "excellent," "good," "fair" or "poor" (EGFP). While symmetrical scales often are the right choice in other measurement tasks, we have found that ratings of almost every local government service in almost every jurisdiction tend, on average, to he positive (that is, above the scale midpoint). Therefore, to permit finer distinctions among positively rated services, EGFP offers three options across which to spread those ratings. EGFP is more neutral because it requires no positive statement of service quality to judge (as agree -disagree scales require) and, finally, EGFP intends to measure absolute quality of service delivery or community quality (unlike satisfaction scales which ignore residents' perceptions of quality in favor of their report on the acceptability of the level of service offered). Summary Report 1 RThe City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey Survey Background Putting Evaluations onto a 100-Point Scale Although responses to many of the evaluative questions were made on a 4 point scale With 1 representing the best rating{ and 4 the worst, many, of the results in this summary are reported on a common scale where 0 is the worst possible rating and 100 is the best possible ratings. If everyone reported "excellent," then the result would be 100 on the 100-point scale. Likewise, if all respondents gave a "poor" rating, the result would he 0 on the 100-point scale. If the average rating for quality of life was "good," then the result would be 67 on a 100-point scale; "fair" would be 33 on the 100-point scale. The 95 percent confidence interval around an average score on the 100-point scale is no greater than plus or minus 3 points based on all respondents. Summary Report 2 The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey PROFILE OF CHANHASSEN As assessed by the survey, about 37% of Chanhassen residents have lived in the community, for more than 20 years and 73% are over age 34. Another 7% are over age 64. Eighty-eight percent are currently employed; 7% rent; 93% own and 76% live in detached single family homes. Over 95% of Chanhassen residents have at least some college and 86% have annual household incomes above $50,000. One percent of Chanhassen residents reported that they are Spanish, Hispanic or Latino and 94% said they are White or Caucasian. Suuiniary Report _ J The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey COMMUNITY LIFE The National Citizen Survey- contained many questions related to the life of residents in the community. Survey participants were asked to rate their overall quality of life, as well as other aspects of quality of life in Chanhassen. They also evaluated characteristics of the community, and gave their perceptions of safety in the City of Chanhassen. The questionnaire assessed use of the amenities of the community and involvement by respondents in the civic and economic life of Chanhassen. Quality of Life When asked to rate the overall quality of life in Chanhassen, 35% of respondents. thought it was "excellent." Only, 0% rated overall quality of life as "poor." Chanhassen as a place to raise children received an average rating of 81 on a 100-point scale.. Ratings of Community Characteristics In 2007, the highest rated characteristics of Chanhassen were air quality, recreational opportunities, and overall appearance. The average rating on a 100-point scale given to air quality in 2007 was 73 compared to 72 in 2005. Perceptions of Safety When evaluating safety in the community, 89% of respondents felt "somewhat" or "very safe" from violent crimes in Chanhassen in 2007, compared to 87% in 2005. In their neighborhood after dark, 88% of survey participants felt "somewhat" or "very safe" in 2007, compared to 89% in 2005. In 2007, as assessed by the survey, 5% of households reported that at least one member had been the victim of one or more crimes in the past year. In 2005, 8% of households had reported that at least one member had been a crime victim. Of those who had been the victim of a crime in 2007, 72% had reported it to police. Community Participation Participation in the civic, social and economic life of Chanhassen during the past year was assessed on the survey. Among those completing the questionnaire, 41% reported volunteering in the past year. Summary Report 4 The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey LOCAL GOVERNMENT Several aspects of the govermnent of the City of Chanhassen were evaluated by residents completing The National Citizen Survey'". They were asked how much trust they placed in their local government, and what they felt about the services they receive from the City of Chanhassen. Those who had any contact with a City of Chanhassen employee in the past year gave their impressions of the most recent encounter. Public Trust When asked to evaluate whether they were pleased with the overall direction taken by the City of Chanhassen, residents gave an average rating of 66 on a 100-point scale in 2007, compared to a rating of 65 in 2005. Service Provided by .Chanhassen The overall quality of services provided by the City of Chanhassen was rated as 67 on a 100-point scale in 2007, compared to 65 in 2005. The City of Chanhassen Employees Impressions of the City of Chanhassen employees were assessed on the questionnaire. In 2007, those who had been in contact with a City of Chanhassen employee in the past year (52%) rated their overall impression as 73 on a 100-point scale, compared to an average rating of 69 received in 2005. Summary Report 5 The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS Four additional questions were asked by the City of Chanhassen as listed below. The results for these questions are also available in the Report of Results. Question 16a: Policy Question 1 The City completed a retail market study that showed Chanhassen businesses successfully meet day-to-day shopping needs, and a regional mall along with the new Highway 212 in the City of Chanhassen would be viable and expand the retail opportunities in our city. The City Council would like to know the level to which you Neither agree or disagree with the Strongly Somewhat agree nor Somewhat Strongly following statements: agree agree disagree disagree disagree Total would like a regional mall built along the new Highway 212 29% 24% 16% 14% 17% 100% I would like the City to focus retail expansion in the downtown area and not along the new Highway 212 21% 25% 24% 20% 10% 100% I would like to limit retail to the amount currently found in Chanhassen and not build a regional mall 16% 13% 17% 25% 29% 100% Question 16b: Policy Question 2 Medium Large I do not (two (multiple support the Small department department No development (specialty stores and stores and preference of a regional stores specialty specialty in terms of mall in only) stores) stores) scale Chanhassen Total What size mall, if at all, would you like to see developed in Chanhassen? (select only one) 10% 34% 22% 9% 25% 100% ,�_ Suu� )wort ___ The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey F'.rdiiian2l O� nsiions Question 16c: Policy Question 3 How important, if at all, is it to you to have the City do the following? Very Somewhat Essential important important Not at all important Total Keep the Chanhassen Dinner Theater in the City 39% 33% 20% 7% 100% Increase the amount of park space ---------------- 13% 31% 38% 18% 100% Increase law enforcement services _ ---------------------------- 13% 34% 41% 11% 100% Lower property taxes 32% 27% 34% 7% 100% Improve lake water quality 29% 44% 24% 4% 100% Note: "don't know" responses have been removed. T Question 16d: Policy Question 4 North of Highway South of Highway 5 5 Total Which of the following best describes where you live? 60% 40% 100% .Su ary Report CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard • Chanhassen, MN 55317 • T: (952) 227-1118 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us The City of Chanhassen, Minnesota 6ummary Report 2007 ow Citizen SurveyTM National Research Center, Inc. 3005 30' St. • Boulder, CO 80301 • T: (303) 444-7853 • F: (303) 444-1145 • www.n-r-c.com The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS SurveyBackground.......................................................................................... 1 About The National Citizen Survey.................................................................................. 1 Understanding the Results.................................................................................................. 1 Profileof Chanhassen...................................................................................... 3 CommunityLife............................................................................................... 4 Quality of lafe.................................................................................................................... 4 Ratings of Community Characteristics................................................................................ 4 Perceptions of Safety.......................................................................................................... 4 Community Participation................................................................................................... 4 LocalGovernment ...................................... :.................................................... 5 Public Trust....................................................................................................................... 5 Service Provided by Chanhassen......................................................................................... 5 The City of Chanhassen Employees.................................................................................... 5 AdditionalQuestions....................................................................................... 6 Su ary Report The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey SURVEY BACKGROUND About The National Citizen Survey' The National Citizen Survey' (Tice NCS'") is a collaborative effort between National Research Center, Inc. (NRC) and the International City/County Management Association (ICMA). Understanding the Results Survey Administration Following the mailing of a pre -survey notification postcard to a random sample of 1,200 households, surveys were mailed to the same residences approximately one week later. A reminder letter and a new survey were sent to the same households after two weeks. Of the mailed postcards, 57 were undeliverable due to vacant or "not found" addresses. Completed surveys were received from 513 residents, for a response rate of 45%. Typically, the response rates obtained on citizen surveys range from 25% to 40%. It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a "level of confidence" (or margin of error). The 95 percent confidence level for this survey of 1,200 residents is generally no greater than plus or minus 5 percentage points around any given percent reported for the entire sample. The results were weighted to reflect the demographic profile of all residents in the City of Chanhassen. (For more information on the survey methodology, see Appendix B in the Report of Results. A copy of the survey materials can he found in Appendix C of the Report of Results.) Use of the "Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor" Response Scale The scale on which respondents are asked to record their opinions about service and community quality is "excellent," "good," "fair' or "poor" (EGFP). While symmetrical scales often are the right choice in other measurement tasks, we have found that ratings of almost every local government service in almost every jurisdiction tend, on average, to be positive (that is, above the scale midpoint). Therefore, to permit finer distinctions among positively rated services, EGFP offers three options across which to spread those ratings. EGFP is more neutral because it requires no positive statement of service quality to judge (as agree -disagree scales require) and, finally, EGFP intends to measure absolute quality of service delivery or community quality (unlike satisfaction scales which ignore residents' perceptions of quality, in favor of their report on the acceptability of the level of service offered). Summary Report 1 The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey Survey EipagrO r,,�, Putting Evaluations onto a 100-Point Scale Although responses to many of the evaluative questions were made on a 4 point scale with 1 representing the best rating and 4 the worst, many of the results in this summary are reported on a common scale where 0 is the worst possible rating and 100 is the best possible rating. If everyone reported "excellent," then the result would be 100 on the 100-point scale. Likewise, if all respondents gave a "poor" rating, the result would be 0 on the 100-point scale. If the average rating for quality of life was "good," then the result would be 67 on a 100-point scale; "fair" would be 33 on the 100-point scale. The 95 percent confidence interval around an average score on the 100-point scale is no greater than plus or minus 3 points based on all respondents. Summary Report _ 2 The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey PROFILE OF CHANHASSEN As assessed by the survey, about 37% of Chanhassen residents have lived in the community for more than 20 years and 73% are over age 34. Another 7% are over age 64. Eighty-eight percent are currently employed; 7% rent; 93% own and 76% live in detached single family homes. Over 95% of Chanhassen residents have at least some college and 86% have annual household incomes above $50,000. One percent of Chanhassen residents reported that they are .Spanish, Hispanic or Latino and 94% said they are White or Caucasian. Suu=ary Report 0 The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey COMMUNITY LIFE The National Citizen Survey- contained many questions related to the life of residents in the community. Survey participants were asked to rate their overall quality of life, as well as other aspects of quality of life in Chanhassen. They also evaluated characteristics of the community, and gave their perceptions of safety in the City of Chanhassen. The questionnaire assessed use of the amenities of the community and involvement by respondents in the civic and economic life of Chanhassen. _Quality of Life _ When asked to rate the overall quality of life in Chanhassen, 35% of respondents thought it was "excellent." Only 0% rated overall quality of life as "poor." Chanhassen as a place to raise children received an average rating of 81 on a 100-point scale. . Ratings of Community Characteristics In 2007, the highest rated characteristics of Chanhassen were air quality, recreational opportunities, and overall appearance. The average rating on a 100-point scale given to air quality in 2007 was 73 compared to 72 in 2005. Perceptions of Safety When evaluating safety in the community, 89% of respondents felt "somewhat" or "very safe" from violent crimes in Chanhassen in 2007, compared to 87% in 2005. In their neighborhood after dark, 88% of survey participants felt "somewhat" or "very safe" in 2007, compared to 89% in 2005. In 2007, as assessed by the survey, 5% of households reported that at least one member had been the victim of one or more crimes in the past year. In 2005, 8% of households had reported that at least one member had been a crime victim. Of those who had been the victim of a crime in 2007, 72% had reported it to police. Participation in the civic, social and economic life of Chanhassen during the past year was assessed on the survey. Among those completing the questionnaire, 41% reported volunteering in the past year. Summary Report The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey LOCAL GOVERNMENT Several aspects of the government of the City of Chanhassen were evaluated by residents completing The National Citizen Survey-. They were asked how much trust they placed in their local government, and what they felt shout the services they receive from the City of Chanhassen. Those who had any contact with a City of Chanhassen employee in the past year gave their impressions of the most recent encounter. Public Trust When asked to evaluate whether they were pleased with the overall direction taken by the City of Chanhassen, residents gave an average rating of 66 on a 100-point scale in 2007, compared to a rating of 65 in 2005. Service Provided by Chanhassen The overall quality of services provided by the City of Chanhassen was rated as 67 on a 100-point scale in 2007, compared to 65 in 2005. The City -of Chanhassen Employees Impressions of the City of Chanhassen employees were assessed on the questionnaire. In 2007, those who had heen in contact with a City of Chanhassen employee in the past year (52%) rated their overall impression as 73 on a 100-point scale, compared to an average rating of 69 received in 2005. .Summary Report 5 The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS Four additional questions were asked by the City of Chanhassen as listed below. The results for these questions are also available in the Report of Results. Question 16a: Policy Question 1 The City completed a retail market study that showed Chanhassen businesses successfully meet day-to-day shopping needs, and a regional mall along with the new Highway 212 in the City of - Chanhassen would be viable and expand the retail opportunities in our city. The City Council would like to know the level to which you Neither agree or disagree with the Strongly Somewhat agree nor Somewhat Strongly following statements: agree agree disagree disagree disagree Total I would like a regional mall built along the new Highway 212 29% 24% 16% 14% 17% 100% I would like the City to focus retail expansion in the downtown area and not along the new Highway 212 21 % 25% 24% 20% 10% 100% I would like to limit retail to the amount currently found in Chanhassen and not build a regional mall 16% 13% 17% 25% 29% 100% Question 16b: Policy Question 2 Medium Large I do not (two (multiple support the Small department department No development (specialty stores and stores and preference of a regional stores specialty specialty in terms of mall in only) stores) stores) scale Chanhassen Total What size mall, if at all, would you like to see developed in Chanhassen? (select only one) 10% 34% 22% 9% 25% 100% -_ Summary Report 8 The City of Chanhassen Citizen Survey Additional Questions Question 16c: Policy Question 3 How important, if at all, is it to you to have the City do the Very Somewhat Not at all following? Essential important important important Total Keep the Chanhassen Dinner Theater in the City 39% 33% 20% 7% 100% Increase the amount of park space 13% 31% 38% 18% 100% Increase law enforcement services 13% 340/6 41% 11% 100% Lower property taxes 32% 27% 34% 7% 100% Improve lake water quality 29% 44% 24% 4% 100% Note: "don't know' responses have been removed. Question 16d: Policy Question 4 North of Highway South of Highway 5 5 Total Which of the following best describes where you live? 60% 40% 100% Suotmary Report 7 Property Card Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name CHANHASSEN 212 LP Mailing Address 5270 HOWARDS POINT RD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8368 Property Address Address City Parcel ID Number 250230500 Parcel Information Uses Agricultural GIS Acres 24.55 Tax Acres 25.84 Plat Lot Block Tax Description NE1/4 SW1/4 EXC: THAT P/O SHOWN AS PARCEL 64 ON MN DOT R-O-W PLAT 10- 19 Building Style Year Built Building Information Finished Sq Ft Other Garage N Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead 0112 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF N CREEK Assessor Information Bedrooms Bathrooms Green Acres Ag Preserve Y N Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale (Payable 2014) (Payable 2015) Land $1,104,800.00 $1,713,800.00 Date of Sale 02/14/2000 Building $0,00 $0.00 Sale Value $252,500.00 Total $1,104,800.00 $1,713,800.00 Qualified/ U Unqualified 04 Disclaimer This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Carver County does not guarantee accuracy of the material contained herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota WhAN Statutes 466 03. Subd. 21 (2000). and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County from any and all claims brought by User. CARVER its employees or agentsor third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided COUNTY Friday, November 21, 2014 Carver County, MN Page 1 of 1 Property Card Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name FOX PROPERTIES LP Mailing Address 27990 SMITHTOWN RD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-7911 Property Address Address City Parcel ID Number 250230300 Parcel Information Uses Agricultural GIS Acres 54.07 Rural Vacant Land Tax Acres 51.10 Plat Lot Block S1/2 SW1/4 LYING WILY OF LINE 2 DESC AS: BEG AT S 1/4 CORN OF SECT 23 TH W Tax Description ON AZIMUTH OF 271 ' ON S LINE SECT 23 1634.23' TH ON AN AZIMUTH OF 0` 500.11' TH ON AN AZIMUTH OF 91' 1173.46' TH ON AN AZIMUTH OF 29' 152.11, TH ON AN AZIMUTH OF 352' 709.36' TO Building Style Year Built Building Information Finished Sq Ft Other Garage N Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead 0112 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF N CREEK Bedrooms Bathrooms Green Acres Ag Preserve Y N Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale (Payable 2014) (Payable 2015) Land $2,833,000.00 $3,417,600.00 Date of Sale Building $0.00 $0.00 Sale Value Total $2,833,000.00 $3,417,600.00 Qualified/ Unqualified Disclaimer This mformaLon is to be used for reference purposes only Carver County does not guarantee accuracy of Me material _. contained herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all daims, and agrees to defend. indemnify, and hold harmless the County from any and all claims brought by User, CARVER Ih employees or agents, or third parties which arse out of the user's access or use of data provided COUNTY Friday, November 21, 2014 Carver County, MN Page 1 of 1 Property Card Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name LCR HOLDINGS LLC Mailing Address 14191 113TH ST LITTLE FALLS, MN 56345-6352 Property Address Address 0 LYMAN BLVD City CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 Parcel ID Number 250230410 Parcel Information Uses Agricultural GIS Acres 20,00 Tax Acres 19,95 Plat Lot Block Tax Description S 658.24' OF NW1/4 SW1/4 Building Information Building Style Finished Sq Ft Bedrooms Year Built Other Garage N Bathrooms C- Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve 0112 INS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF N Y N CREEK Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale (Payable 2014) (Payable 2015) Land $876,300.00 $1,631,300,00 Date of Sale 08/13/2014 Building $0.00 $0.00 Sale Value $3,605.000.0 Total $876,300.00 - $1,631,300.00 Qualified/ U Unqualified Disciaimer This mfonnanone to be used for reference purposes only. Caner County does not guarantee accuracy of the material contained herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466 03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold ham less the County from any and all claims brought by User. CARVER its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the users access or use of data pre"cled. COUNTY Friday. November 21, 2014 Carver County, MN Page 1 of 1 Property Card Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name LCR HOLDINGS LLC Mailing Address 14191 113TH ST LITTLE FALLS, MN 56345-6352 Property Address Address 0 LYMAN BLVD City CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 Uses ill Tax Description Building Style Year Built Parcel ID Number 250230430 Parcel Information Agricultural GIS Acres 16.08 Tax Acres 16.05 Plat Lot ---- ---- -- Block NW1/4 SW1/4 EXC: S 658.24' THEREOF & EXC: N 420' OF E 414.86' THEREOF. Building Information Finished Sq Ft Other Garage N Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead 0112 INS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF N CREEK Bedrooms Bathrooms Green Acres Ag Preserve Y N Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale (Payable 2014) (Payable 2015) Land $721,100.00 $1,348.000.00 Date of Sale Building $0.00 $14,100.00 Sale Value Total $721,100.00 $1,362,100.00 Qualified/ _ Unqualified Disclaimer This tion informais to be used for reference purposes only Carver County does not guarantee accuracy of the material contained herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims. and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County from any and all claims brought by User. CARVER its employees or agents, or third parties which arse out of the users access or use of data provided. COUNTY Friday, November 21, 2014 Carver County, MN Page 1 of 1 Property Card Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name LCR HOLDINGS LLC Mailing Address 14191 113TH ST LITTLE FALLS, MN 56345-6352 Property Address Address 1551 LYMAN BLVD City CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 Uses Tax Description Building Style Year Built Parcel ID Number 250230420 Parcel Information Res 1 unit GIS Acres 4.00 Tax Acres 4.00 Plat Lot Block N 420.0' OF E 414.86' OF NW1/4 SW1/4 2 STORY 1989 Building Information Finished Sq Ft 8551 Bedrooms Other Garage Y Miscellaneous Information Bathrooms 0 4.50 School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve 0112 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF N N N CREEK Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale (Payable 2014) (Payable 2015) Land $119,500.00 $326,500.00 Date of Sale Building $386,200.00 $198,700.00 Sale Value Total $505,700.00 $525,200.00 Qualified/ Unqualified AM Disclaimer: This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Carver County does not guarantee accuracy of the material contained herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466.03. Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages, and _ expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County from any and all claims brought by user, CARVER its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out or the user's access or use of data provided. COUNTY Friday, November 21, 2014 Carver County, MN page 1 of 1 Chanhassen, MN Code of Ordinances Page 1 of 1 Sec. 20-517. - General concept plan. (a) In order to receive guidance in the design of a PUD prior to submission of a formal application, an applicant may submit a concept plan for review and comment by the planning commission and city council. Submission of a concept plan is optional but is highly recommended for large PUDs. In order for the review to be of most help to the applicant, the concept plan should contain such specific information as is suggested by the city. Generally, this information should include the following information appropriate to the type of development, e.g., commercial, industrial or residential: (1) Approximate building areas, pedestrian ways and road locations; (2) Height, bulk and square footage of buildings; (3) Type, number or square footage or intensities of specific land uses; (4) Number of dwelling units; (5) Generalized development plan showing areas to be developed or preserved; and (6) Staging and timing of the development. (b) The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be filed with the city before the staff commences review. Approval of the concept statement shall not obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district. (c) The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures: (1) The developer meets with the city staff to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan, together with all supporting data. (3) The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and make recommendations to the city council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official newspaper at least ten days prior to the hearing. Written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten days prior thereto to owners of land within 500 feet of the boundary of the property and an on -site notification sign erected. (4) Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning commission, the city council shall consider the proposal. The council may comment on the concept plan. (Ord. No. 80, Art V, § 18(5-18-6(2)), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 377, § 72, 5-24-04; Ord. No. 409, § 3, 1-9-06,, Ord. No. 54Z § 3, 6-25-12) about:blank 11/17/2014 2 Land Use 2.1 - INTRODUCTION The purpose of the land use plan is to identify appropriate locations for all types of uses and provides for the orderly expansion of municipal services through the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) phasing plan. The land use plan influences the framework for the way the land is used and ultimately provides the community's quality of life. The plan also provides the structure for the City Council, Planning Commission, and Park and Recreation Commission to make decisions on individual development requests. 2.2 - DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCES The City has a wealth of natural resources including 12 lakes, 356 wetlands, and the origin of several major stream drainages including Bluff Creek, Riley Creek, and Purgatory Creek. The City also has some very sensitive aquatic resources such as Assumption Creek, Seminary Fen, and the wetlands associated with the Minnesota River. Cumulatively, wetlands total 2,370 acres within the City limits, which is approximately 15% of the total area of the City. Storm water ponds account for an additional 78 acres of aquatic habitat. Lakes compose a significant portion of the City, with the 12 mapped lakes comprising 1,526 acres. Cumulatively, surface water features (lakes, wetlands, streams and ponds) account for 4,269 acres of the City's surface area. The City is bordered by the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum to the west, the Minnesota River to the south, and is border by six municipalities: Shorewood, Minnetonka, Victoria, Shakopee, Chaska and Eden Prairie. With Minnetonka, Eden Prairie and Shorewood by and large mostly developed, Chanhassen will continue to see growth in all sectors of land use. One of the biggest factors influencing this growth is the construction and anticipated completion of new Highway 212. In the City's 2020 Land Use Plan, a build/no-build scenario was contemplated for Highway 212. With the construction of the highway, the City was afforded the opportunity to revisit the recommended land uses along the corridor. It is anticipated that residential growth will continue on its pace with access to the new highway. Job creation has grown and the City will have added over 3,500 jobs over the last ten years. The City anticipates over 15,000 jobs by the year 2030. 2.3 - GROWTH FORECAST Figure 2-1 outlines anticipated development in five-year stages: Ciry of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan Lill ISE 12 -1 Figure 2.1: Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages, Existing and Planned Land Use in Acres Within Urban Service Area Allowed Density Range Housing UnIWAcre Existing (2000) 2010 2015 2020 1 202E 2030 Change 2000-2030 Minimum Maximum Residential Land Uses Low Density Residential (developed) 1.2 4 2,600 3,100 3,920 4,500 4,550 4,702 2,102 Low Density Residential (vacant) 2.102 1,602 782 202 152 - Medium Density Residential (developed) 4 8 155 300 320 350 375 400 245 Medium Density Residential (vacant) 245 100 80 50 25 - High Density Residential (developed) 8 16 55 112 140 180 195 218 163 High Density Residential (vaunt) 163 106 78 38 23 - Mixed Use Primarily Residential' (developed) 8 20 30 40 45 50 50 50 20 Mixed Use Primarily Residential' (vaunt) 20 10 5 - - C/I Land Uses Est Employees/Acre Commercial (developed) 25 240 270 300 318 320 328 88 Commercial (vaunt) 88 58 28 10 8 Industrial (developed) 7 500 632 800 841 860 883 383 Industrial (vaunt) 383 251 83 42 23 - Office(developed) 28 240 260 300 325 334 339 99 Office (vaunt) 99 79 39 14 5 - Mixed Use Primarily C/1' (developed) 26 35 40 45 65 65 65 30 Mixed Use Primarily C4' (vaunt) 30 25 20 - - - Extractive Public/Semi Public Land Uses Institutional 1,213 1,213 1,213 1,213 1,213 1,213 - Parks and Recreation 417 430 438 457 457 457 40 Open Space 934 934 934 934 934 934 - Roadway Rights of Way 1.237 1,237 1,237 1.237 1.237 1.237 - Utility - Railroad - Airport Subtotal Sewered 10,786 0,799 0,807 10,826 10,826 10,826 3,170 Outside Urban Service Area Minimum lot size Maximum lot size Existing (2000) 2010 2015 2020 2026 2030 Change 2000-2030 Rural Residential 2.5 acres or less - Rural Residential 2.5 -10 acres 2.5 na 971 971 971 971 971 971 - Rural Residential 10-40 acres - Agricultural 40+acres 40 27 19 - - - (40) Agriculture land use 1904 1 904 904 904 904 904 Subtotal Unsewered 1,915 1 1,902 1,894 1,876 1,875 1,876 1 (40) Undeveloped Wetlands (within land use designations) - - 2,210 2,2W 2.210 2,2W 2,210 2,210 - Open Water, Rivers and Streams - - 2,059 2,059 2.059 2,059 2,059 2,059 Total 14,760 4,760 4,760 4,760 14,760 14,760 J,1J0 2 2 1 LAND USE City of Chanhassen e 2030 Comprehensive Plan 2.4 - LAND USE COMPARISONS Figure 2.2: 2008.2030 Land Use Comparisons Land Use 2008 Existina Land Use 2030 Land Use Plan Acres Percent Acres Percent Commercial 142 1.2% 328 2.2% Office/Industrial 694 5.7% 883 6.0% Office 114 0.9% 339 2.3% Parks & Open Space 1,297 10.6% 1 391 9.4°k Public/Semi-Public 1204 9.9% 1213 8.2% Residential Lar a Lot 870 7.1% 971 6.6% Residential Low Dens 3,295 27.0% 4 702 31.9°k Residential Medium Dens' 219 1.8% 400 2.7% Residential High Dens 120 1.0% 218 1.5% Mixed Use 51 0.4%1 115 0.8% Undevelo able 4 200 34.4% 4,200 28.5% TOTAL 12 206 14.760 Undevelo able Lakes Flood lain Rivers Streams 2,059 Road Right -of -Way 1,237 Agriculture 904 TOTAL 4,200 2.5 - RESIDENTIAL LAND USES Within the current MUSA, density ranges are those specified for the land use. Outside the MUSH, the overall density limit is one unit per 10 acres. 2.5.1 RESIDENTIAL — LARGE LOT Developments within this category are likely to be either large -lot estates or Waal, agricultural - oriented dwellings. Large -lot residential is generally found south of Pioneer Trail. Other areas of large -lot residential exist north of Trunk Highway 5, along Lake Lucy Road and south of Trunk Highway 5, east of Galpin Boulevard. Large -lot residential developments are subject to a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. New large -lot residential subdivision proliferated in 1987 immediately prior to enactment of a one unit per ten - acre density limitation in the zoning code. Due to the current density restriction, major expansion of the R-LL use category is not expected. Thus, the number of potential Waal residential lots has been greatly reduced. For projecting land demand, an average of 0.4 net units per acre was used. There are only two zoning applications within the large lot density- A2, Agricultural Estate District, and RR, Rural Residential District. 2.5.2 RESIDENTIAL — LOW DENSITY The dominate type of development within the residential districts is low -density, single-family detached housing. Net densities within this category range from 1.2 to 4.0 units per acre. For projection of land demand, an average density of two dwelling units per acre was used. There are several zoning applications within the low density including RSF (Residential Single Family), R-4 (Mixed Low Density), RLM (Residential Low and Medium Density), and PUD-R (Planned Unit Development -Residential). City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan LAID ISE 12 - 3 2.5.3 RESIDENTIAL — MEDIUM DENSITY 'Ihe medium density designation is intended to accommodate multiple units including duplexes, townhouses and lower density apartments, or condominiums. A net density range of 4.0 — 8.0 units per acre is covered by this category with an expected density of 6.0 units per acre. The zoning options in the medium density land use include R4 (Mixed Low Density), RLM (Residential Low and Medium density), (Mixed Medium Density Residential) and PUD-R (Planned United Development -Residential). Medium density is viewed as transitional use between low density and commercial, office or high density areas. 2.5.4 RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY The high density category includes units with a density range of 8-16 units per acre accommodating apartments and condominium units. Within this category, an average density of 10 units per acre is used for land use projections. 'Ihe zoning options in the high density land uses include R-8 (Mixed Medium Density), R-12 and R-16 (High Density Residential), and PUD-R (Planned United Development -Residential). High density is located on major transportation corridors that include transit, commercial centers and employment centers. 2.6 - INDUSTRIAL LAND USE In the last 10 years, the City has added over 3.2 million square feet of commercial and industrial use. The City anticipates to accelerate industrial development with the completion of Highway 212. The City has historically seen the development of office/industrial types uses. The City has reduced the office/industrial land use and created more office guiding in the 2030 plan. The appropriate zoning for this land use includes IOP (Industrial Office Park) and PUD (Planned Unit Development- Office/Industrial). 2.7 - COMMERCIAL LAND USE The City has maintained a long-standing policy of directing commercial development into the Central Business District. Chanhassen historically has and maintains an active business community. With the construction of Highway 312, the City sought the opportunity to re-examine commercial opportunities outside of the downtown core. 'Ihe City, in partnership with the Chamber of Commerce, contracted the McComb Group, Ltd. to study the City's retail opportunities. The study found that the City could support a potential regional mall and continue to have a healthy downtown business district. The City contracted with SRF Consulting Group to develop different commercial scenarios. The City will be revising the commercial land use and zoning districts to provide for additional commercial adjacent to the downtown and for a regional mall/lifestyle center. The percentage of commercial land use has doubled in the 2030 plan. Following are the new zoning districts. The City zoning ordinance will be amended to create the development standards for these districts. 2 - 6 1 LAND USE City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan Figure 2.5: Chanhassen Commercial Land Use Categories I l i 1 A- Centml Business Dhtdst e B-Neighborhood/Convenience Comwrdal C-Commwity Ormerdal ;t D-RegionalUeS*Cmter City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan LLID ➢SE 12 - 7 2.7.1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Definition/Vuiow A business, commercial, office and residential district that provides a comprehensive range of services at higher development densities and with greater variety of uses in a compact, walkable environment. The Central Business District has the greatest concentration of jobs, services, housing and civic uses found in the City. Generally, the Citys highest density development is found in the Central Business District area. Other development -supportive infrastructures such as parking garages are more likely to be found downtown than in other land use districts. A combination of convenience commercial, civic uses and attractive walking paths promote interaction and multiple trips among shoppers, visitors and residents. New development in this district is encouraged to complement the mix and contribute to activity over an extended day, and provide attractive, comfortable walking environments between varied uses. Goods and Seroiees Examples • Residential • Office • Entertainment (Restaurants, Theaters, Music Venues) • Retail, Grocery, Household Goods and Services • Fitness Activities • Hotels • Health Services (Clinics) The zoning districts in this land use will be CBD (Central Business District) and BH (Business Highway). 2.7.2 NEIGHBORHOOD/CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL Definition/Vuiom A neighborhood/convenience commercial district is intended for businesses that meet daily needs for the consumption of goods or services, by residents or nearby employees. Neighborhood/convenience commercial districts are mapped for smaller sites with direct access to collector streets and preferably found close to intersections of collector or arterial roads. The scale of these uses should be compatible with surrounding land use patterns, which are typically residential. Neighborhood/convenience commercial uses should have a limited impact on surrounding areas, measured in terms of hours of operation, noise and light impacts, signage and odor. No single use in a neighborhood/convenience commercial district should exceed 10,000 square feet in gross built area. 2 - 8 1 EIDD USE Cite of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan Goods and Services Examples • Small to medium sized restaurants (no drive through windows) • Dry Cleaning • Health/Fitness Services (size limit) • Office • Day Care • Neighborhood Scale Convenience Store • Gas Stations • Personal Services The zoning application for this land use would be BN (Neighborhood Business District). 2.7.3 COMMUNITY AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL Definition/Vision: A large-scale commercial and office district with a need for high visibility along arterial roads. This type of development has a moderate impact on the surrounding environment, including but not limited to lighting, noise and traffic. Location criteria for Community Commercial uses are: access to arterial streets, preferably at intersections with collector and arterial streets; moderate to large -sized sites; public water and sewer service; environmental features such as soils and topography suitable for compact development; and adequate buffeting by physical features or adjacent uses to protect nearby residential development. Goods and Services Examples • Furniture and Home Furnishings • Electronic and Appliance Stores • Building Material and Garden Supplies • Auto Parts and Accessories • Sporting Goods A new zoning district CC (Community Commercial) will be created in the City Code to implement this land use. 2.7.4 REGIONAUUFESTYLE CENTER COMMERCIAL. DefinitionlVisiom A mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors and is designed to serve trail users and mass transit as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity and mix of retail and service uses within their boundaries. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan LIAR 9$E 1 2 - 9 designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. Goods and Services Examples • Entertainment • Department Store • Comparison Shopping • Specialty Retail/Boutique • Restaurants • Hotels • Residential A new zoning district RC (Regional Commercial) will be created in the City Code to implement this land use. The City has given a dual land use of the 160 acres at the southeast corner of Powers and Lyman Boulevards to accommodate this use. 2.7.5 BUSINESS FRINGE DISTRICT The City has a Business Fringe district that was created to accommodate limited commercial activity without urban services. This land use district located at the intersection of Highway 101 and Flying Cloud Drive will no longer be consistent with the Citys land use once urban services are available. 2.8 - PUBLIC SEMI-PUBLIC LAND USE Uses in this land use designation include the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, Campfire Girls — Camp Tanadoona, public school buildings including Districts 112 and 276, City owned property and the 170-plus acres of the Eckankar campus. The zoning is either OI (Office and Institutional District), A2 (Agricultural Estate District) and RR (Rural Residential District). 2.9 - AGRICULTURE LAND USE Consistent with the 2030 Regional Development Framework, the City does not provide for a purely agricultural land use, but rather supports the preservation of this use in greater Carver County. With the urbanization of the City, there is only one active farm. There are some properties that continue to lease their land for crop production. The City reduces the development pressures on agricultural land through its MUSA phasing plan and a policy of protecting agricultural land from premature development until such time as are services are available and requested. There is one property in the city that has Agriculture Preservation designation. It is currently scheduled to be removed from that status in 2011. This property has been given a dual land use or either Regional Commercial or Office use. The City has identified areas that are guided agricultural, but these are not likely developable because of being located in flood plain and extensive wetlands, including the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge and Raguet Wildlife Management Area. 2 10 1 LAND USE City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan 2.10- OFFICE LAND USE This land use has increased since the last comprehensive plan was completed. In addition, the City has identified other property for this land use. In the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, less than 1% of the City was guided Office; this has increased to 2.3% in the 2030 plan. With the increase in the number of dwelling units, the City has seen an increase in the number of "office" uses including medical uses and corporate headquarters. The City has given a dual land use designation for the 160 acres at the southeast corner of Powers and Lyman Boulevards. Should a lifestyle center not be feasible, then an office development, corporate headquarters site would be appropriate. The zoning district for the land is OI (Office Institutional District). 2.11 - MIXED USE LAND USE The City has two minced -use districts which are located at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and TH 101, and south ofTH 5 east ofTH 101. The mixed use land use permits commercial and high - density residential development. The northerly site was developed as a new urbanism development known as "Village on the Ponds". The Lyman Boulevard site has pending development including an 800-stall park -and -ride ramp, neighborhood commercial and high -density residential development. The commercial use is intended to support or compliment the residential development. If the Lyman Boulevard site is developed commercially, it shall be with neighborhood -oriented commercial uses. These areas have been zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development). 2.12 - PARKS AND OPEN SPACE LAND USE The percent of land use for Parks and Open Space includes approximately 75 acres of potential new park or open space. The City has acquired additional open space with the application of the Bluff Creek Overlay District and the use of density transfer to preserve land adjacent to those areas that are wooded or have slopes in excess of 30%. All City parks and Lake Minnewashta Regional Park are in this land use designation. All zoning districts permit parks. 2.13 - POLICY ISSUES 2.13.1 BUFFERYARD CONCEPT Natural features should be used wherever possible to create buffers between residential developments located next to non-residential uses. When natural buffering does not exist, additional setback or buffering is required. A buffering setback requirement has been created in the City Code. 2.13.2 MUSA IMPACT ON EXISTING LOTS Prior to 1987, there were a number of large -lot subdivisions created. These developments contain homes equipped with on -site sewage disposal systems. These systems are a substantial investment on the part of the homeowner and are currently an environmentally acceptable method of dealing with waste generated by this type of development. It is the policy of the City that these subdivisions remain large lot with a minimum lot size of 21h acres. Requests for changes may be made incrementally (on a case -by -case basis), but it is City policy to review land use and zoning changes on an area wide basis. City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan L►II ISE 12 - 11 2.13.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING MAP INCONSISTENCY Regardless of a property's land use designation, properties not served by urban services shall not be rezoned to a zoning category consistent with the land use designation until such time as urban services are available. Current zoning of a parcel with a less -intensive land use designation may remain. Intensification of land uses may only happen with the provision of urban services. 2.13.4 MAXIMUM USE OF ALLOWABLE DENSITY Based on the Citys housing goals and participation in the Livable Communities Act, the City has the right to deny any project that does not meet the minimum density allowed in the land use designation. Reasons for denial include deviation from City requirements, or off -setting the goals of the City. Additionally, the City may provide for a density bonus for the provision of affordable housing. 2.14 MUSA STAGING The City will be fiilly developed by 2020. It is anticipated that infill and redevelopment will take place between 2020 and 2030. The lift station planned approximately in the year 2010 will serve the rest of the development area in the City. A revised phasing plan is being proposed in order to provide enough developable land for the construction of this lift station. Because of the number of large lot subdivisions in the southern portion of the City, the phasing plan will be modified to 2010 and 2015. 2.15 - GOALS & POLICIES 1. Goah Achieve a mixture of development which will assure a high quality of life and a reliable tax base. Policies • Develop and maintain the City's land use plan so it is utilized as a fundamental tool for directing the community's growth. • Recognizing some uses pay their way in terms of the property taxes they generate and some uses do not. Chanhassen will strive for a mixture of development which will assure its financial well being. • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line and at the same time Chanhassen will plan the reasonable and orderly expansion of the MUSA line to meet its need for additional developable land. • Encourage low density residential development in appropriate areas of the community in a manner that reinforces the character and integrity of existing single-family neighborhoods while promoting the establishment of new neighborhoods of similar quality. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide for a full range of housing opportunities. These opportunities require that adequate land be designated for medium and high -density land uses. The City will seek to discourage the conversion of these areas to lower City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan L11D USE 1 2 -13 density uses to ensure that the goal of housing diversity can be met regardless of temporary market fluctuations. • Chanhassen will continue to encourage the location of commercial uses in the central business district. Commercial development outside the central business district and its fringe should complement the Central Business District. • The City will encourage the development of neighborhood service centers where appropriate. These may be developed as a part of a mixed -use development or a PUD. Development of unplanned and strip commercial centers shall be discouraged. • Planned industrial and office development will be encouraged as a means of strengthening tax base growth and creating new employment opportunities. It is believed that planned growth can and should be designed to minimize environmental neighborhood and traffic impact. • The City will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types; the more incompatible to the neighboring uses, the more important the transition zone. For example, natural features may provide good transitions between incompatible uses or uses of moderate intensity. The Land Use Plan also seeks the establishment of buffer yards which represent areas of increased setbacks where a developer will be required to install landscaping and berming to offer improved separation of incompatible uses. Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the City to provide services. Development should occur in areas where services are available before extending services to new areas. • Development should be planned to provide adequate internal street linkages. The land use should also seek to direct growth in a manner that makes the most efficient use of the areas highway system. Development should be planned to avoid running high traffic volumes and/ or nonresidential traffic through residential neighborhoods. • The Land Use Plan will be utilized to facilitate the Citys efforts to anticipate future needs for open space, roads, parks, schools, utilities, etc., and make adequate provision for them prior to the time they are needed. • Areas outside the MUSA shall be preserved as an agricultural zone or used to support very low density development. It is the City's policy to ensure that this area is not prematurely developed. The City will discourage the expansion or construction of commercial and industrial facilities in this area. • Large lot subdivisions that do not have City sewer or water shall be allowed to remain as is without requiring urban services even when they are in the MUSA area, until the majority of the residents want/request to change their use. The smallest lot allowed in these subdivisions is two and one-half acres. Larger lots may be subdivided if the lots meet the minimum 2% acre requirement and a suitable location is available for septic and well. 2 14 1 LAND USE City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive plan • The City will maintain a comprehensive and up-to-date set of ordinances to ensure that development is consistent with the plan while resulting in high quality, sensitively designed projects. Ordinances should be reviewed and modified as necessary to improve performance standards for new development to ensure that they incorporate high quality design, landscape, etc. The PUD Ordinance should also be reviewed for similar reasons. • The City will seek to work with other jurisdictions to combine resources inducting cities, counties, Southwest Metro Transit, the school districts and the State to coordinate and collaborate on mutual interests such as a library, public works, collective waste, arts council, transit site, recreation, etc. City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan LAND USE 12 15 2 Land Use 2.1 - INTRODUCTION The purpose of the land use plan is to identify appropriate locations for all types of uses and provides for the orderly expansion of municipal services through the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) phasing plan. The land use plan influences the framework for the way the land is used and ultimately provides the community's quality of life. The plan also provides the structure for the City Council, Planning Commission, and Park and Recreation Commission to make decisions on individual development requests. 2.2 - DEVELOPMENT INFLUENCES The City has a wealth of natural resources including 12 lakes, 356 wetlands, and the origin of several major stream drainages including Bluff Creek, Riley Creek, and Purgatory Creek. The City also has some very sensitive aquatic resources such as Assumption Creek, Seminary Fen, and the wetlands associated with the Minnesota River. Cumulatively, wetlands total 2,370 acres within the City limits, which is approximately 15% of the total area of the City. Storm water ponds account for an additional 78 acres of aquatic habitat. Lakes compose a significant portion of the City, with the 12 mapped lakes comprising 1,526 acres. Cumulatively, surface water features (lakes, wetlands, streams and ponds) account for 4,269 acres of the City's surface area. The City is bordered by the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum to the west, the Minnesota River to the south, and is border by six municipalities: Shorewood, Minnetonka, Victoria, Shakopee, Chaska and Eden Prairie. With Minnetonka, Eden Prairie and Shorewood by and large mostly developed, Chanhassen will continue to see growth in all sectors of land use. One of the biggest factors influencing this growth is the construction and anticipated completion of new Highway 212. In the City's 2020 Land Use Plan, a build/no-build scenario was contemplated for Highway 212. With the construction of the highway, the City was afforded the opportunity to revisit the recommended land uses along the corridor. It is anticipated that residential growth will continue on its pace with access to the new highway. Job creation has grown and the City will have added over 3,500 jobs over the last ten years. The City anticipates over 15,000 jobs by the year 2030. 2.3 - GROWTH FORECAST Figure 2-1 outlines anticipated development in five-year stages: City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan Lap USE 12 -1 Figure 2.1: Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages, Existing and Planned Land Use in Acres Within Urban Service Area Allowed Dena Hy Range Housing Unlbl/Acre E (2000) 2000) 2010 2016 2020 2025 2030 Change 2000-2030 Minimum Maximum Residential Land Uses Low Density Residential (developed) 1.2 4 2,600 3,100 3.920 4.500 4,550 4,702 2,102 Low Density Residential (vacant) 2.102 1,602 782 202 152 - Medium Density Residential (developed) 4 8 155 300 320 350 375 400 245 Medium Density Residential (vacant) 245 1 100 80 1 50 25 - High Density Residential (developed) 8 16 55 112 140 180 195 218 163 High Density Residential (vacant) 163 106 78 38 23 - Mixed Use Primarily Residential' (developed) 8 20 30 40 45 50 50 50 20 Mixed Use Primarily Residential' (vacant) 20 10 5 - - CO Land Uses Est Employees/Acre Commercial (developed) 25 240 270 300 318 320 328 88 Commercial (vacant) 88 58 28 10 8 - Industrial (developed) 7 500 632 800 841 860 883 383 Industrial (vacant) 1 383 251 83 42 23 Office (developed) 28 240 260 300 325 334 339 99 Office (vacant) 99 79 39 14 5 Mixed Use Primarily C4' (developed) 26 35 40 45 65 65 65 30 Mixed Use Primarily C0' (vacant) 30 25 20 - Extractive - Public/Semi Public Land Uses Institutional 1,213 1,213 1,213 1.213 1,213 1,213 Parks and Recreation 417 430 438 457 457 457 40 Open Space 934 934 934 934 934 934 Roadway Rights of Way 1.237 1.237 1,237 1,237 1,237 1,237 - utility Railroad Airport Subtotal Sewered 10,786 0,799 0,807 10,826 10,826 10,826 3,170 Outside Urban Service Area Minimum lot size Maximum lot size Existing (2000) 2010 2015 2020 2026 2030 Change 2000-2030 Rural Residential 2.5 acres or less - Rucal Residential 2.5 -10 acres 2.5 na 971 971 971 971 971 971 - Rural Residential 10-40 acres - AgriculWhil40+acres 40 27 19 - (40) Agriculture land use 904 904 904 904 904 904 - Subtotal Unsewered 1 1,916 1,902 1,894 1,876 1,876 1,876 (40) Undeveloped Wetlands (within land use designations) - - 2.210 2,210 2,210 2.210 2,210 2,210 Open Water, Rivers and Streams - - 2,059 2,059 2,059 2,059 2,059 2,059 Total 14,760 4,760 1 4,760 4,760 14,760 14,760 3,130 2 2 1 LAND USE City of Chanhassen e 2030 Comprehensive Plan 2.4 - LAND USE COMPARISONS Fiqure 2.2: 2008.2030 Land Use Comoarisons Land Use 2008 Existina Land Use 2030 Land Use Plan Acres I Percent Acres I Percent Commercial 142 1.2% 328 2.2% Office/lndustrial 694 5.7% 883 6.0% Office 114 0.9% 339 2.3% Parks & O en S ace 1,297 10.6% 1 391 9.4% Public/Semi-Public 1204 9.9% 1213 8.2% Residential Lame Lot 870 7.1% 971 6.6% Residential Low Dens 3,295 27.0°A 4 702 31.9°A Residential Medium Densi 219 1.8% 400 2.7% Residential Hi h Densi 120 1.0% 218 1.5% Mixed Use 51 0.4°A 115 0.8% Undevelo able 4 200 34.4% 4 200 28.5°A TOTAL 12.2051 14,750 Undevelo able Lakes Flood lain Rivers Streams 2,059 Road Right -of -Way 1,237 Agriculture 904 TOTAL 4,200 2.5 - RESIDENTIAL LAND USES Within the current MUSA, density ranges are those specified for the land use. Outside the MUSH, the overall density limit is one unit per 10 acres. 2.5.1 RESIDENTIAL — LARGE LOT Developments within this category are likely to be either large -lot estates or rural, agricultural - oriented dwellings. Large -lot residential is generally found south of Pioneer Trail. Other areas of large -lot residential exist north of Trunk Highway 5, along Lake Lucy Road and south of Trunk Highway 5, east of Galpin Boulevard. Large -lot residential developments are subject to a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. New large -lot residential subdivision proliferated in 1987 immediately prior to enactment of a one unit per ten - acre density limitation in the zoning code. Due to the current density restriction, major expansion of the R-LL use category is not expected. Thus, the number of potential rural residential lots has been greatly reduced. For projecting land demand, an average of 0.4 net units per acre was used. There are only two zoning applications within the large lot densityA2, Agricultural Estate District, and RR, Rural Residential District. 2.5.2 RESIDENTIAL, — LOW DENSITY The dominate type of development within the residential districts is low -density, single-family detached housing. Net densities within this category range from 1.2 to 4.0 units per acre. For projection of land demand, an average density of two dwelling units per acre was used. There are several zoning applications within the low density including RSF (Residential Single Family), R-4 (Mixed Low Density), RLM (Residential Low and Medium Density), and PUD-R (Planned Unit Development -Residential). City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan LAID USE 1 2 - 3 2.5.3 RESIDENTIAL — MEDIUM DENSITY The medium density designation is intended to accommodate multiple units including duplexes, townhouses and lower density apartments, or condominiums. A net density range of 4.0 — 8.0 units per acre is covered by this category with an expected density of 6.0 units per acre. The zoning options in the medium density land use include R4 (Mixed Low Density), RLM (Residential Low and Medium density), (Mixed Medium Density Residential) and PUD-R (Planned United Development -Residential). Medium density is viewed as transitional use between low density and commercial, office or high density areas. 2.5.4 RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY The high density category includes units with a density range of 8-16 units per acre accommodating apartments and condominium units. Within this category, an average density of 10 units per acre is used for land use projections. The zoning options in the high density land uses include R-8 (Mixed Medium Density), R-12 and R-16 (High Density Residential), and PUD-R (Planned United Development -Residential). High density is located on major transportation corridors that include transit, commercial centers and employment centers. 2.6 - INDUSTRIAL LAND USE In the last 10 years, the City has added over 3.2 million square feet of commercial and industrial use. The City anticipates to accelerate industrial development with the completion of Highway 212. The City has historically seen the development of office/industrial types uses. The City has reduced the office/industrial land use and created more office guiding in the 2030 plan. The appropriate zoning for this land use includes IOP (Industrial Office Park) and PUD (Planned Unit Development- Office/Industrial). 2.7 - COMMERCIAL LAND USE The City has maintained a long-standing policy of directing commercial development into the Central Business District. Chanhassen historically has and maintains an active business community. With the construction of Highway 312, the City sought the opportunity to re-examine commercial opportunities outside of the downtown core. The City, in partnership with the Chamber of Commerce, contracted the McComb Group, Ltd. to study the CiWs retail opportunities. The study found that the City could support a potential regional mall and continue to have a healthy downtown business district. The City contracted with SRF Consulting Group to develop different commercial scenarios. The City will be revising the commercial land use and zoning districts to provide for additional commercial adjacent to the downtown and for a regional mall/lifestyle center. The percentage of commercial land use has doubled in the 2030 plan. Following are the new zoning districts. The City zoning ordinance will be amended to create the development standards for these districts. 2 - 6 1 LAND USE City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan Figure 2-5: Chanhassen Commercial Land Use Categories yO�i�• L _p p\ . Y 1 � s ■ e .. ••••....... •. ��(�.as 7.....uu.i A tI , i w . � � .... 1 t 3 i ■ i i + ■ t1 f t 7 i I r t �. ;'t„ is ,` ■ _. 00 17 i ,io ` ■ 10 t { ■'0 A -(am] Business D&ict 1 t0 B- NeghhothoodKatrvenimm Commerdal a a !.� •.,. r 1 C-Community(ommesdal 1 ' 0 D-Regimal/Weg eCenter City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan END USE 1 2 - 7 2.7.1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Definition/Vision: A business, commercial, office and residential district that provides a comprehensive range of services at higher development densities and with greater variety of uses in a compact, walkable environment. The Central Business District has the greatest concentration of jobs, services, housing and civic uses found in the City. Generally, the City's highest density development is found in the Central Business District area. Other development -supportive infrastructures such as parking garages are more likely to be found downtown than in other land use districts. A combination of convenience commercial, civic uses and attractive walking paths promote interaction and multiple trips among shoppers, visitors and residents. New development in this district is encouraged to complement the mix and contribute to activity over an extended day, and provide attractive, comfortable walking environments between varied uses. Goods and Services Examples • Residential • Office • Entertainment (Restaurants, Theaters, Music Venues) Retail, Grocery, Household Goods and Services • Fitness Activities • Hotels • Health Services (Clinics) The zoning districts in this land use will be CBD (Central Business District) and BH (Business Highway). 2.7.2 NEIGHBORHOOD/CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL Defrnition/Vision: A neighborhood/convenience commercial district is intended for businesses that meet daily needs for the consumption of goods or services, by residents or nearby employees. Neighborhood/convenience commercial districts are mapped for smaller sites with direct access to collector streets and preferably found close to intersections of collector or arterial roads. The scale of these uses should be compatible with surrounding land use patterns, which are typically residential. Neighborhood/convenience commercial uses should have a limited impact on surrounding areas, measured in terms of hours of operation, noise and fight impacts, signage and odor. No single use in a neighborhood/convenience commercial district should exceed 10,000 square feet in gross built area. 2 - 8 1 LBO ESE City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan Goods and Services Examples • Small to medium sized restaurants (no drive through windows) • Dry Cleaning • Health/Fitness Services (size limit) • Office • Day Care • Neighborhood Scale Convenience Store • Gas Stations • Personal Services The zoning application for this land use would be BN (Neighborhood Business District). 2.7.3 COMMUNITY AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL Definition/Vision: A large-scale commercial and office district with a need for high visibility along arterial roads. This type of development has a moderate impact on the surrounding environment, including but not limited to lighting, noise and traffic. Location criteria for Community Commercial uses are: access to arterial streets, preferably at intersections with collector and arterial streets; moderate to large -sized sites; public water and sewer service; environmental features such as soils and topography suitable for compact development; and adequate buffering by physical features or adjacent uses to protect nearby residential development. Goods and Services Examples • Furniture and Home Furnishings • Electronic and Appliance Stores • Building Material and Garden Supplies • Auto Parts and Accessories • Sporting Goods A new zoning district CC (Community Commercial) will be created in the City Code to implement this land use. 2.7.4 REGIONALILIFESTYLE CENTER COMMERCIAL Definition/Visiom A mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors and is designed to serve trail users and mass transit as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity and mix of retail and service uses within their boundaries. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan LAND USE 12 9 designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. Goods and Seroiees Examples Entertainment • Department Store Comparison Shopping • Specialty Retail/Boutique Restaurants • Hotels • Residential A new zoning district RC (Regional Commercial) will be created in the City Code to implement this land use. The City has given a dual land use of the 160 acres at the southeast corner of Powers and Lyman Boulevards to accommodate this use. 2.7.5 BUSINESS FRINGE DISTRICT The City has a Business Fringe district that was created to accommodate limited commercial activity without urban services. This land use district located at the intersection of Highway 101 and Flying Cloud Drive will no longer be consistent with the City's land use once urban services are available. 2.8 - PUBLIC SEMI-PUBLIC LAND USE Uses in this land use designation include the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, Campfire Girls — Camp Tanadoona, public school buildings including Districts 112 and 276, City owned property and the 170-plus acres of the Eckankar campus. The zoning is either OI (Office and Institutional District), A2 (Agricultural Estate District) and RR (Rural Residential District). 2.9 - AGRICULTURE LAND USE Consistent with the 2030 Regional Development Framework, the City does not provide for a purely agricultural land use, but rather supports the preservation of this use in greater Carver County. With the urbanization of the City, there is only one active farm. There are some properties that continue to lease their land for crop production. The City reduces the development pressures on agricultural land through its MUSA phasing plan and a policy of protecting agricultural land from premature development until such time as are services are available and requested. There is one property in the city that has Agriculture Preservation designation. It is currently scheduled to be removed from that status in 2011. This property has been given a dual land use or either Regional Commercial or Office use. The City has identified areas that are guided agricultural, but these are not likely developable because of being located in flood plain and extensive wetlands, including the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge and Raguet Wildlife Management Area. 2 -10 1 LOP USE City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan 2.10- OFFICE LAND USE This land use has increased since the last comprehensive plan was completed. In addition, the City has identified other property for this land use. In the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, less than 1% of the City was guided Office; this has increased to 2.3% in the 2030 plan. With the increase in the number of dwelling units, the City has seen an increase in the number of "office" uses including medical uses and corporate headquarters. The City has given a dual land use designation for the 160 acres at the southeast corner of Powers and Lyman Boulevards. Should a lifestyle center not be feasible, then an office development, corporate headquarters site would be appropriate. The zoning district for the land is OI (Office Institutional District). 2.11- MIIED USE LAND USE The City has two mixed -use districts which are located at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and TH 101, and south ofTH 5 east ofTH 101. The mixed use land use permits commercial and high - density residential development. The northerly site was developed as a new urbanism development known as "Village on the Ponds". The Lyman Boulevard site has pending development including an 800-stall park -and -ride ramp, neighborhood commercial and high -density residential development. The commercial use is intended to support or compliment the residential development. If the Lyman Boulevard site is developed commercially, it shall be with neighborhood -oriented commercial uses. These areas have been zoned PUD (Planned Unit Development). 2.12 - PARI(S AND OPEN SPACE LAND USE The percent of land use for Parks and Open Space includes approximately 75 acres of potential new park or open space. The City has acquired additional open space with the application of the Bluff Creek Overlay District and the use of density transfer to preserve land adjacent to those areas that are wooded or have slopes in excess of 30%. All City parks and Lake Minnewashta Regional Park are in this land use designation. All zoning districts permit parks. 2.13 - POLICY ISSUES 2.13.1 BUFFER YARD CONCEPT Natural features should be used wherever possible to create buffers between residential developments located next to non-residential uses. When natural buffering does not exist, additional setback or buffering is required. A buffering setback requirement has been created in the City Code. 2.13.2 MUSA IMPACT ON EXISTING LOTS Prior to 1987, there were a number of large -lot subdivisions created. These developments contain homes equipped with on -site sewage disposal systems. These systems are a substantial investment on the part of the homeowner and are currently an environmentally acceptable method of dealing with waste generated by this type of development. It is the policy of the City that these subdivisions remain large lot with a minimum lot size of 2'h acres. Requests for changes may be made incrementally (on a rare -by -case basis), but it is City policy to review land use and zoning changes on an area wide basis. City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan LID USE 12 - 11 2.13.3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING MAP INCONSISTENCY Regardless of a propertys land use designation, properties not served by urban services shall not be rezoned to a zoning category consistent with the land use designation until such time as urban services are available. Current zoning of a parcel with a less -intensive land use designation may remain. Intensification of land uses may only happen with the provision of urban services. 2.13.4 MAXIMUM USE OF ALLOWABLE DENSITY Based on the City's housing goals and participation in the Livable Communities Act, the City has the right to deny any project that does not meet the minimum density allowed in the land use designation. Reasons for denial include deviation from City requirements, or off -setting the goals of the City. Additionally, the City may provide for a density bonus for the provision of affordable housing. 2.14 MUSH STAGING The City will be fully developed by 2020. It is anticipated that infill and redevelopment will take place between 2020 and 2030. The lift station planned approximately in the year 2010 will serve the rest of the development area in the City. A revised phasing plan is being proposed in order to provide enough developable land for the construction of this lift station. Because of the number of large lot subdivisions in the southern portion of the City, the phasing plan will be modified to 2010 and 2015. 2.15 - GOALS & POLICIES 1. Goah Achieve a mixture of development which will assure a high quality of life and a reliable tax base. Policies • Develop and maintain the Citys land use plan so it is utilized as a fundamental tool for directing the communitys growth. • Recognizing some uses pay their way in terms of the property taxes they generate and some uses do not. Chanhassen will strive for a mixture of development which will assure its financial well being. • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line and at the same time Chanhassen will plan the reasonable and orderly expansion of the MUSA line to meet its need for additional developable land. • Encourage low density residential development in appropriate areas of the community in a manner that reinforces the character and integrity of existing single-family neighborhoods while promoting the establishment of new neighborhoods of similar quality. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide for a full range of housing opportunities. These opportunities require that adequate land be designated for medium and high -density land uses. The City will seek to discourage the conversion of these areas to lower Ciry of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan LARD USE 12 -13 density uses to ensure that the goal of housing diversity can be met regardless of temporary market fluctuations. • Chanhassen will continue to encourage the location of commercial uses in the central business district. Commercial development outside the central business district and its fringe should complement the Central Business District. • The City will encourage the development of neighborhood service centers where appropriate. These may be developed as a part of a mixed -use development or a PUD. Development of unplanned and strip commercial centers shall be discouraged. • Planned industrial and office development will be encouraged as a means of strengthening tax base growth and creating new employment opportunities. It is believed that planned growth can and should be designed to minimize environmental neighborhood and traffic impact. • The City will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types; the more incompatible to the neighboring uses, the more important the transition zone. For example, natural features may provide good transitions between incompatible uses or uses of moderate intensity. The Land Use Plan also seeks the establishment of buffer yards which represent areas of increased setbacks where a developer will be required to install landscaping and berming to offer improved separation of incompatible uses. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the City to provide services. Development should occur in areas where services are available before extending services to new areas. Development should be planned to provide adequate internal street linkages. The land use should also seek to direct growth in a manner that makes the most efficient use of the area's highway system. Development should be planned to avoid running high traffic volumes and/ or nonresidential traffic through residential neighborhoods. • The Land Use Plan will be utilized to facilitate the City's efforts to anticipate future needs for open space, roads, parks, schools, utilities, etc., and make adequate provision for them prior to the time they are needed. Areas outside the MUSA shall be preserved as an agricultural zone or used to support very low density development. It is the City's policy to ensure that this area is not prematurely developed. The City will discourage the expansion or construction of commercial and industrial facilities in this area. • Large lot subdivisions that do not have City sewer or water shall be allowed to remain as is without requiring urban services even when they are in the MUSA area, until the majority of the residents want/request to change their use. The smallest lot allowed in these subdivisions is two and one-half acres. Larger lots may be subdivided if the lots meet the minimum 2'h acre requirement and a suitable location is available for septic and well. 2 14 1 LAND USE City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan • The City will maintain a comprehensive and up-to-date set of ordinances to ensure that development is consistent with the plan while resulting in high quality, sensitively designed projects. Ordinances should be reviewed and modified as necessary to improve performance standards for new development to ensure that they incorporate high quality design, landscape, etc. The PUD Ordinance should also be reviewed for similar reasons. • The City will seek to work with other jurisdictions to combine resources including cities, counties, Southwest Metro Transit, the school districts and the State to coordinate and collaborate on mutual interests such as a library, public works, collective waste, arts council, transit site, recreation, etc. City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive plan Lill 05E 12 -15 Sec. 20-509. - Standards and guidelines for regionalUestyle center commercial planned unit developments. (a) Intent. (1)The use of planned unit developments for regional/lifestyle center commercial purposes should result in a reasonable and verifiable exchange between the city and the developer. This district is intended to provide for the development of regional and community scale integrated retail, office, business services, personal services and services to the traveling public near freeway interchanges. It shall strive to create a self- sustaining pattern of land uses with cultural, employment, entertainment, housing, shopping and social components. (2) The regional/lifestyle center commercial district is a mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors. It shall be designed to serve pedestrian and mass transit users as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type, generally, have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity of mixed retail and service uses. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. (3) Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme, but shall avoid monotony in design and visual appearance. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. (b) Minimum lot size: 10,000 square feet (c) Minimum lot width at building setback. 100 feet. (d) Minimum lot depth: 100 feet. (e) Minimum setbacks: Building setbacks are also a function of the building height. As a buildings height increases above 35 feet, the front, rear and project perimeter setback shall increase on a one to one basis. The increased setback shall only apply to that portion of the building that exceeds 35 feet, e.g., a 40-foot tall building would be set back ten feet (front or rear) at that point where the building height equals 40 feet. A building height may step back, providing the setbackibuilding height ratio is maintained. (1) PUD exterior: 30 feet. The 30-foot PUD exterior setback may be changed, increased or decreased, by the city council as part of the approval process when it is demonstrated that environmental protection or development design will be enhanced. Building setbacks adjacent to exterior development lot lines abutting an area designated for residential use in the comprehensive plan shall be 50 feet, unless unique circumstances are found which would allow the city to reduce the setback requirement. (2) Front yard: 5 feet. (2) Rear yard. 5 feet. 5)Parking: Setbacks feet): mnt: 10 Side: 10 ear; 10 (6) Parking setback exemptions: a. There is no minimum parking setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off-street parking area. b. Parking along public streets shall provide an appropriate transition, which shall incorporate such elements as landscaping, decorative fencing, public art, berming, etc. c. Parking setbacks adjacent to exterior development lot lines abutting an area designated for residential use in the comprehensive plan shall be 50 feet unless unique circumstances are found which would allow the city to reduce the setback requirement. Unique circumstances include site elevation, separation by natural features such as wetlands or stands of mature trees or substantial visual screening through berming and landscaping. (7) Parking standards shall comply with City Code for type and location. (f) Maximum building height: mercial—retail stories Minercial—services 13 stories ffice J5 stories esidential 5 stories (g) Protection and preservation of natural features. The applicant must demonstrate that the flexibility provided by the PUD is used to protect and preserve natural features such as tree stands, wetlands, ponds and scenic views. These areas are to be permanently protected as public or private tracts or protected by permanently recorded easements. (h) Landscaping plan. An overall landscaping plan is required. The plan shall contain the following: (1) Boulevard plantings. Located in front yards shall require a mix of over -story trees and other plantings consistent with the site. Landscaped berms shall be provided to screen the site from major roadways, railroads and less intensive land uses. In place of mass grading for building pads and roads, stone or decorative blocks retaining walls shall be employed as required to preserve mature trees and the site's natural topography. (2) Exterior landscaping and double fronted lots. Landscaped berms shall be provided to buffer the site and lots from major roadways, railroads, and less intensive uses. Similar measures shall be provided for double -fronted lots. Where necessary to accommodate this landscaping, additional lot depth may be required. (3) Foundation and yard plantings. A minimum budget or plan for foundation plants shall be established and approved by the city. As each parcel is developed in the PUD, the builder shall be required to install plant materials meeting or exceeding the required budget or prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy or provide financial guarantees acceptable to the city. (4) Tree preservation. Tree preservation is a primary goal of the PUD. A detailed tree survey should be prepared during the design of the PUD and the plans should be developed to maximize tree preservation. (i) Architectural standards. The applicant should demonstrate that the PUD will provide for a high level of architectural design and building materials. While this requirement is not intended to minimise design flexibility, a set of architectural standards should be prepared for city approval. The primary purpose of this section is to assure the city that high quality design will be employed and that home construction can take place without variances or impact to adjoining lots. The PUD agreement should include the following: (1) Standards for exterior architectural treatments; (2) (2) Streetscape requirements: a. Every building shall incorporate a streetscape, public realm space between the building the roadway. The use of canopies, awnings or arcades is encouraged in these interfaces. b. Outdoor seating areas must be in a controlled or cordoned area with at least one access to an acceptable pedestrian walk. Seating areas may be shared by multiple uses. When a liquor license is involved, an enclosure is required around the outdoor seating area and the enclosure shall not be interrupted; access to such seating area must be through the principle building. Outdoor seating areas must be located and designed so as not to interfere with pedestrian and vehicular circulation. c. Streetscape elements shall include: Landscaping, lighting and street furniture such as benches, bus shelters, kiosks, planters, public art, tables and chairs, etc. (Ord. No. 488, § 3, 11-23-09) Sec. 20-509. - Standards and guidelines for regional/lifestyle center commercial planned unit developments. (a) Intent. (1)The use of planned unit developments for regional/lifestyle center commercial purposes should result in a reasonable and verifiable exchange between the city and the developer. This district is intended to provide for the development of regional and community scale integrated retail, office, business services, personal services and services to the traveling public near freeway interchanges. It shall strive to create a self- sustaining pattern of land uses with cultural, employment, entertainment, housing, shopping and social components. (2) The regional/lifestyle center commercial district is a mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors. It shall be designed to serve pedestrian and mass transit users as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type, generally, have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity of mixed retail and service uses. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. (3) Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and . structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme, but shall avoid monotony in design and visual appearance. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. (b) Minimum lot size: 10,000 square feet (c) Minimum lot width at building setback: 100 feet. (d) Minimum lot depth: 100 feet. (e) Minimum setbacks: Building setbacks are also a function of the building height. As a building's height increases above 35 feet, the front, rear and project perimeter setback shall increase on a one to one basis. The increased setback shall only apply to that portion of the building that exceeds 35 feet, e.g., a 40-foot tall building would be set back ten feet (front or rear) at that point where the building height equals 40 feet. A building height may step back, providing the setback/building height ratio is maintained. (1) PUD exterior: 30 feet. The 30-foot PUD exterior setback may be changed, increased or decreased, by the city council as part of the approval process when it is demonstrated that environmental protection or development design will be enhanced. Building setbacks adjacent to exterior development lot lines abutting an area designated for residential use in the comprehensive plan shall be 50 feet, unless unique circumstances are found which would allow the city to reduce the setback requirement. (2) Front yard: 5 feet. (2) Rear yard: 5 feet. 5) arking: Setbacks (feet): Font: 10 Side: 110 ear; 10 (6) Parking setback exemptions: a. There is no minimum parking setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off-street parking area. b. Parking along public streets shall provide an appropriate transition, which shall incorporate such elements as landscaping, decorative fencing, public art, berming, etc. c. Parking setbacks adjacent to exterior development lot lines abutting an area designated for residential use in the comprehensive plan shall be 50 feet unless unique circumstances are found which would allow the city to reduce the setback requirement. Unique circumstances include site elevation, separation by natural features such as wetlands or stands of mature trees or substantial visual screening through bemvng and landscaping. (7) Parking standards shall comply with City Code for type and location. (f) Maximum building height: mmercial—retail Vo stories mmercial—services 3 stories ffice 5 stories esidential 5 stories (g) Protection and preservation of natural features. The applicant must demonstrate that the flexibility provided by the PUD is used to protect and preserve natural features such as tree stands, wetlands, ponds and scenic views. These areas are to be permanently protected as public or private tracts or protected by permanently recorded easements. (h) Landscaping plan. An overall landscaping plan is required. The plan shall contain the following: (1) Boulevard plantings. Located in front yards shall require a mix of over -story trees and other plantings consistent with the site. Landscaped berms shall be provided to screen the site from major roadways, railroads and less intensive land uses. In place of mass grading for building pads and roads, stone or decorative blocks retaining walls shall be employed as required to preserve mature trees and the site's natural topography. (2) Exterior landscaping and double fronted lots. Landscaped berms shall be provided to buffer the site and lots from major roadways, railroads, and less intensive uses. Similar measures shall be provided for double -fronted lots. Where necessary to accommodate this landscaping, additional lot depth may be required. (3) Foundation and yard plantings. A minimum budget or plan for foundation plants shall be established and approved by the city. As each parcel is developed in the PUD, the builder shall be required to install plant materials meeting or exceeding the required budget or prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy or provide financial guarantees acceptable to the city. (4) Tree preservation. Tree preservation is a primary goal of the PUD. A detailed tree survey should be prepared during the design of the PUD and the plans should be developed to maximize tree preservation. (i) Architectural standards. The applicant should demonstrate that the PUD will provide for a high level of architectural design and building materials. While this requirement is not intended to minimise design flexibility, a set of architectural standards should be prepared for city approval. The primary purpose of this section is to assure the city that high quality design will be employed and that home construction can take place without variances or impact to adjoining lots. The PUD agreement should include the following: (1) Standards for exterior architectural treatments; (2) (2) Streetscape requirements: a. Every building shall incorporate a streetscape, public realm space between the building the roadway. The use of canopies, awnings or arcades is encouraged in these interfaces. b. Outdoor seating areas must be in a controlled or cordoned area with at least one access to an acceptable pedestrian walk. Seating areas may be shared by multiple uses. When a liquor license is involved, an enclosure is required around the outdoor seating area and the enclosure shall not be interrupted; access to such seating area must be through the principle building. Outdoor seating areas must be located and designed so as not to interfere with pedestrian and vehicular circulation. c. Streetscape elements shall include: Landscaping, lighting and street furniture such as benches, bus shelters, kiosks, planters, public art, tables and chairs, etc. (Ord. No. 488, § 3, 11-23-09) Chanhassen, MN Code of Ordinances Page 1 of 1 Sec. 20-517. - General concept plan. (a) In order to receive guidance in the design of a PUD prior to submission of a formal application, an applicant may submit a concept plan for review and comment by the planning commission and city council. Submission of a concept plan is optional but is highly recommended for large PUDs. In order for the review to be of most help to the applicant, the concept plan should contain such specific information as is suggested by the city. Generally, this information should include the following information appropriate to the type of development, e.g., commercial, industrial or residential: (1) Approximate building areas, pedestrian ways and road locations; (2) Height, bulk and square footage of buildings; (3) Type, number or square footage or intensities of specific land uses; (4) Number of dwelling units; (5) Generalized development plan showing areas to be developed or preserved; and (6) Staging and timing of the development. (b) The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be filed with the city before the staff commences review. Approval of the concept statement shall not obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district. (c) The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures: (1) The developer meets with the city staff to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan, together with all supporting data. (3) The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and make recommendations to the city council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official newspaper at least ten days prior to the hearing. Written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten days prior thereto to owners of land within 500 feet of the boundary of the property and an on -site notification sign erected. (4) Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning commission, the city council shall consider the proposal. The council may comment on the concept plan. (Ord. No. 80, Art V, § 18(5-18-6(2)), 12-15-86 Ord. No. 377, § 72, 5-24-04; Ord. No. 409, § 3, 1-9-06; Ord. No. 542, § 3, 6-25-12) about:blank 11/17/2014 density uses to ensure that the goal of housing diversity can be met regardless of temporary market fluctuations. • Chanhassen will continue to encourage the location of commercial uses in the central business district. Commercial development outside the central business district and its fringe should complement the Central Business District. • The City will encourage the development of neighborhood service centers where appropriate. These may be developed as a part of a mixed -use development or a PUD. Development of unplanned and strip commercial centers shall be discouraged. • Planned industrial and office development will be encouraged as a means of strengthening tax base growth and creating new employment opportunities. It is believed that planned growth can and should be designed to minimize environmental neighborhood and traffic impact. • The City will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types; the more incompatible to the neighboring uses, the more important the transition zone. For example, natural features may provide good transitions between incompatible uses or uses of moderate intensity. The Land Use Plan also seeks the establishment of buffer yards which represent areas of increased setbacks where a developer will be required to install landscaping and berming to offer improved separation of incompatible uses. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the City to provide services. Development should occur in areas where services are available before extending services to new areas. • Development should be planned to provide adequate internal street linkages. The land use should also seek to direct growth in a manner that makes the most efficient use of the areas highway system. Development should be planned to avoid running high traffic volumes and/ or nonresidential traffic through residential neighborhoods. • The Land Use Plan will be utilized to facilitate the Ciry's efforts to anticipate future needs for open space, roads, parks, schools, utilities, etc., and make adequate provision for them prior to the time they are needed. • Areas outside the MUSA shall be preserved as an agricultural zone or used to support very low density development. It is the City's policy to ensure that this area is not prematurely developed. The City will discourage the expansion or construction of commercial and industrial facilities in this area. • Large lot subdivisions that do not have City sewer or water shall be allowed to remain as is without requiring urban services even when they are in the MUSA area, until the majority of the residents want/request to change their use. The smallest lot allowed in these subdivisions is two and one-half acres. Larger lots may be subdivided if the lots meet the minimum 21e acre requirement and a suitable location is available for septic and well. 2 14 1 LAND USE City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan • The City will maintain a comprehensive and up-to-date set of ordinances to ensure that development is consistent with the plan while resulting in high quality, sensitively designed projects. Ordinances should be reviewed and modified as necessary to improve performance standards for new development to ensure that they incorporate high quality design, landscape, etc. The PUD Ordinance should also be reviewed for similar reasons. • The City will seek to work with other jurisdictions to combine resources including cities, counties, SouthWest Metro Transit, the school districts and the State to coordinate and collaborate on mutual interests such as a library, public works, collective waste, arts council, transit site, recreation, etc. City of Chanhassen • 2030 Comprehensive Plan LAND USE 12 15 CONCEPT 2 -nM6'mm�cnc.� . Ca�;Vwawd aedcc,�rbsun ateiaan.flw Qmt t^M NORTH 11CACICSIb"IARY air .s� F<=476a 6@9wal C=m+md J;q Ft . ISt.-W Ak.d t m MGe- 316tt AP�dwf De,W4t.Mt. 40 -"M4hl 3LVQej - MOR MAI Cambnd m,-W and An X- oaY mmM7.m 1 _ Q I n v BWM1. • n� unna� Mn.n iVMRnI ' 1Nn LICF ir mum office . MDR o:�R erOM O �CnonAT AOu •nenuR REGIONALCOMMERCUIL 18.2 IS 58F.20� 82 84 35FAR1 OFFICE 54.0 - MIXED USE 5% RES / 25% 53 43 - 10 UNnS/ 31,W (SO FAR) HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 8.2 82- 18UNITS/AC - MEDIUM DENSnYRESIDENTIAL 503 MR - t6UNIT A STORMWATER 35 PARK - TOTAL 140A 427 1013,423 KEY ELEMENTS: �►, 6 Corporate office sites near Powers Boulevards 3n�'' I. man Boulevard intersection and south of Highway 212. D Smaller office sites organized around an e0ar.ced existing wetland and at isolated locations aiong Powers Boulevard. Regional commercial located near Powers Boulevard and Highway 212 with highway visibility. D Mixed use district located between office and regional commercial area along Bluff Creek Bouievard collector road extension. 1 Medium density residential along western boundary or north 116 acre area and nestled into developable land between woodland preserve and creek. / Medium density residential located along Pioneer Trail. D High density housing south of collector road against preserved woodland, and located in the far southwest of the update area off of Pioneer Trail. I► Collector road remains in planned configuration, CONCEPT �Y y epwcoen n, .-„ 2bt.•�a'.i w Mr nattJ anf Rz_v:o-.,x pt,cw. h Q'A9r [ekrng e:xs ro GiA r¢cw cx;cgW 7�" :9V]SaMTnb l Y.� 3 SYMROI LAND IISF tY!AN 81VD _ - I! smrmw �{�•; �7i� I F i MQR � >F ArQ9C A(.nF:1CnATF ARCe xn['u•CR GH IAO[[C[ REGIONAL COMMERCIAL 652 7T 022 OFA OFFICE 42A 652 2 .35 FA MIXED US'c Aw HIGH DENSrrYRESIDENnAL 4.2 42-(IOUNITS/AC) MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENVAL 27.7 156 - 6 UNITS A STCRMWATER 4.7 _, PARK 'OTAL 144.6 �208 1 22�550� KEY ELEMENTS: 10 1 Two 30+ arce +sites for regional retail uses. In N D Wetlands in center of site integrated into deveiopement'pattern. Corporate office sites aiong Powers Boulevard Both south of Highway 212. D Smafl office site near the Lyman Boulevard full access intersection and scattered along the developable land near Pioneer Trail. / Medium density residential along western boundary of north 116 acres and nestled into developable land between woodland preserve and creek. / High density housing in the far southwest portion of the update area with access off of Pioneer Trail. © Collector road shifts slightly north to create two regional retail sites and uses additional round -a -bout for traffic calming and access control. CONCEPT 3 LXUM BLVD _ &us ..ewe m.ru Am! eweewm.cC - A&CM tmd woomem1.ei ua.ra..tae rwroAo6tai INWORW 14i�.m.e DTMHUL 1ANIIIICC i rro■orra �w.n tiyncrs+reMll..a O'A II A �yT i _ GIONAL CO O F UPDATE AREA SQUAREFEEr — OFEICE WED 652 42A 0 A 6ARC33 FAR) — G-4 . DgmrryRESIDENTIAL - OUN A _--MEDIUM E Se DENP WA 4._® 7 BRK TOTAL iM 208 t KEY ELEMENTS: D Two 30+ arce + sites ' �` for regional retail uses. / Wetlands In center of site integrated into deveiop$ment'pattern. / Corporate office sites along Powers Boulevard both south of Highway 212. / Small office site near the Lyman Boulevard full access Intersection and scattered along the developable land near PloneerTrail. / Medium density residential along western boundary of north 116 acres and nestled Into developable land between woodland preserve and creek / High density housing in the far southwest portion of the update area with access off of Pioneer Trail. 9 Collector road shifts slightly north to create two regional retail sites and uses additional round -about for traffic calming and access control. RED r•� n nntl!nz � 3 mile miles miles 1 46 ' 2019Population 44.055 22.282 463.970 2014 Population 40,609 115,110 443,798 •Yr3j Projected Growth 8.49% 6.23% 4.55% ti Daytime Population 13,460 37,203 300,074 Bachelor's Degree+ 38.23% 33.60% 33,53% j Z # of Households 14,236 43,483 174,323 d _ Incomes $75,000 + 51.85% 41.97% 34,04% Avg HH Income $87,960 $78,001 $70,234 Med HH Income $77.527 $65,360 $55,041 Housing Value $198,345 $175,820 $156,178 Own Occ Units (%) 76.56% 66.47% 61.67% Own Occ Units (#) 10,899 28,902 107,497 Ni Highway 370 33,000 AADT (2012) SCHRAMIRD_ 72nd Street 19,600 AADT (2012) © # North ,� - c . a�00Y7 C�C,d 1OwMW�0 ,! 4 3Res iifx 0 �9 0 g � \� 9 1� = Mill us SHADOW LAKE 6 �8� �� !. �3ea_ L � • � T 4tw wu TO4ti NECENTER L0 .gym T16 CJ Banks 402-S92-1644_ 16 _ Cadi _ 402-339-2578 Ulf 402339.9040 T/7 _Chico's Christopher & Banks 402-597-4783 Nl d... ablem 402.339-2446 U) Jos. A. Bank 402-537-5900 IS Lane Bryant 402-609 5433 U9 LOFT 402-339-1288 Us mauncas 402.597-8694 RID Old Navy 402-331-1192 Til roil 402-339-1255 T13 Runway Boutique 402-334-6956 F TA Maxx 402 537.1062 Ult Victoria s 8 c et 402 339-1951 "Relron a Twee" � jc0c. 401592-1136 Th. ChildPlace 402 592.1224 Famous Footwezr 402 597 5718 513 Finish Line 402-597-8835 91s SCiSly Food. 06 BYfNIO Wild Wing, 402 596 9464 T2S Chpcolataria Stam 402-933-7826 y Freddy, Frozen Custard 402-597-8909 TS Morning, Noon & Night 402-933-3836 Tl Brewing Company 402-934-7100 03 _Nebraska Old Chicago 402-592-2739 R21 Orange Leaf Yogurt 402-614-7200 09 Red Robin Gourmat Burg.rs 402-331 1349 L11_ Subway 402-934-8891 Ot Taco Bell 402-339-1875_ 05 T... a Roadhouse 402-592-7427 R9 Tropical Smoothie Cafe 402-614-9056 91 _ WMaMatla 402.592.9T3 x2 Alegaot Creighton Health Quick Caro 0ml4.Ny-vns_ I Aspen Athletic Club 402.884-7377 U19 AT&T 402-339.2944 01 Banned Pat Hospital of noseam 402-331-1108 04 Charter West National Bank 402 339 2700 01 Co Solutions Store 402 932 0032 Vi ' -k <lurne,learrever, 402 339 2401 Oil Firestone Complete Auto Care 402 331 4400 0 First Natlonal Bank of Omaha 402 602-2500 02 Hy-Vee Gas 402-339-4290 T7 LansCraften 402-592-3239 T9 Portrait Innovations 402-331.0515 _ x1 SAC Federal Credit Union na.m. eyrv..1 402-829-6409 Sprint 402. 597.1000 U13 Sole Salon Studios 402.650-2076 U12 Top 0 Nails 402-763 4888 07 Vaizon Wlnle.e 402.898-0315 M Goldman, 402-331.4200 1 JCpenn.y 402-592.1025 le Best Buy 402-331-1847 L? Charming Charlie 402-331-OSSO $17 Claire's 402.592-1768 L2 Complete Nutrltlon 402-885-8800 IN Dlck's Sporting Goods 402-592-1642 I) - Dollar Tree 402-339-9493 Sll GNC 402-339-1749 NS Hallmark 402-592-2270 TV Nay Jewelers 402-597-4785 Mattress Firm 402 934 1100 S19 Michaels Opening Fall N Offc.Max 402 597-8701 O PetSmert 402-537.0323 L13 Pier l Imports 402-339.4006 Ll Sally Beauty Supply 402.331.4382 Sector. .....4. ail-neyt 402-592-1825 59 Thin,s Remembered 402-359.1504 58 Tip Top Tux 402-289.3601 ULTA .1. vankee Candle _ _402.5924190 402-596-9000 grocery Hy-Vee 402-597-5790 Office Ol.eetcli nano" near aeew waa.raden Shad.. Lake Management Office 402 537-0046 Sarpy County Chamber of Commerce 402-339-3050 Weight Watcnery Goo-651.4000 DIRECTORY OF STORES NORTH J�C �3YF. � ground ®0 cu HIOHWAy a�a 04g0HO8f ye _Jl llWllYY LALK : SRoio, tune, .L'� 0 AFEA n „ M8nVMOJ,t 01fir, Are ghl N 'A.i f�dy� glulun, Ill..r I i1see, 0 TtT'aPPUN1® y aimTOWN& CPP a M� �y d SUDOW SHADOW LAKE TOWNE CENTER LOCATIOP Papillion, Nebraska • Highway 370 & 72nd Street GLA 816,533 sq. ft. ANCHa.. Dick's Sporting Goods • Gordmans • HyVee Grocery • JCPenney Ann Taylor LOFT • Bath & Body Works • Bed Bath & Beyond • Best Buy • Charming Charlie Chico's Firestone • Kay Jewelers • Michaels • Nebraska Brewing Company • Old Chicago • Old Navy • Orange Leaf Yogurt PetSmart • Pier 1 • Red Robin • Texas Roadhouse • The Children's Place • T.J. Maxx • Victoria's Secret • ULTA • Shadow Lake Towne Center offers a unique experience as the largest outdoor lifestyle center in the state and the only destination hybrid retail center to serve the growing Papillion market. The center boasts a highly localized shopping experience, distinguished by its line-up of popular national retailers, family -friendly dining options, signature events and overall ambience. • Shadow Lake Towne Center has an open-air design with anchors around the perimeter and specialty shops at the center's core. The center offers a strong line-up of department stores, a full -service grocery, office space and specialty stores and restaurants in one convenient location. • Local and regional accessibility to Shadow Lake Towne Center is excellent from Highway 370 and 72nd Street, the only fully continuous north -south arterial in the Omaha MSA. The center boasts strong traffic numbers —nearly 9.5 million people visit the center annually. RED A COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY -enues/Sports/Con ventions Market Highlights The Omaha metropolitan area is a strong regional retail market —the main retail destination for more than 1.2 million consumers from eight counties within a 60-minute drive. Greater Omaha has a stable economy and offers an excellent quality of life, boasting a diverse economy, cost of living below the national average. outstanding schools, stable housing prices and low unemployment. Sarpy County, the third -largest county in Nebraska, is the fastest growing county in the state, experiencing a 340o increase in population from 2000 through 2012, Sarpy County ranked 11 th on the 2012 list of "Where the Jobs Are" by CNNMoney. As one of Nebraska's fastest growing communities, Papillion is quickly becoming the center of growth for the area's burgeoning private and business sectors. Papillion was ranked No. 5 "Best Places to Live 2011" by CNN/Money Magazine and No. i of the "Top 10 Small Towns" by Livability in 2012 In 2013 Bloomberg Business Week named Papillion the No. 1 place to raise kids in Nebraska. Papillion residents are the wealthiest in Sarpy County with an average household income is $84,253. 30% of the population has a household income of more than $100,000. More than 70%of Papillion residents are employed in white-collar occupations. The award -winning Papillion-La Vista Community School district serves more than 10,000 students in 21 schools, experiencing a 7% increase from 2009-2012. Nearby Otfutt Air Force Base has 12,000 military and civilian employees. The estimated annual economic impact of the base in greater Omaha is $2.9 billion. Werner Park, a new $126 million AAA baseball stadium for the Omaha Storm Chasers welcomes 426,000 fans annually. CNN Money Magazine named Papillion, Nebraska o8 on their list of "Best Places to Live — America's Best Small Towns" for 2013. Aanenson, Kate From: Scott T Carlston <scoft c@carlston.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 11:17 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Fwd: Chaska Creek Kate, This is the project I want to get out in front of. Scott Carlston 612.889.7898 Scott( carlston.com Begin forwarded message: From: "Heieie, Andy" <Andy. Helele taco l liers.com> Date: November 5, 2014 at 11:10:47 AM CST To: Scott Carlston <scott@carlston.com>, "Cozine, Adam" <acozineCcawelshco.com> Subject: Chaska Creek Scott/Cozine, FYI Concept approved for Chaska Creek Business Park including a new Cub Foods On October 21st the Chaska City Council unanimously approved the concept plan for the Chaska Creek Business Park. The Chaska Creek Business Park is an 83-acre site that is located at the southwest corner of Trunk Highway 212 and Engler Boulevard (County Road 10). The project will be jointly developed by Opus Group & HJ Development. For some time, this property has been thought -of, planned, and guided for a mixed -use corporate industrial park that takes advantage of its strategic location and provides the community with a significant head of household job base. The Business Park's mixed -use development contains 5 distinct "districts." The site is bisected by a greenway which straddles Chaska Creek. The 5 districts are: Chaska Creek Retail District; Chaska Creek Professional Office District (Low-rise); Chaska Creek Professional Office District (Mid -rise), Chaska Creek Corporate Industrial District and the Chaska Creek High -Bay Industrial District. The Chaska Creek Retail District is approximately 15 acres in size and is proposed to be anchored by a 50,000-square foot Cub Foods grocery store. The balance of the district would be geared towards neighborhood retail uses like: sit-down restaurants; banks; pharmacies; day care; dry cleaners, or barber/beauty shops. The Chaska Creek Low -Rise Professional Office Districts would contain up to 102,000 square feet of office use on approximately 10.5 acres and is proposed to encourage development of I-3 story office buildings accompanied by surface parking lots for their users. The Chaska Creek Mid -Rise Professional Office District would contain up to 200,000 square feet of office use on an approximately 12 acres site and is proposed to encourage office development from 2 to 6 stories in height. The office building(s) is accompanied by either all surface parking or a combination of surface and structured parking for its users. The Chaska Creek Corporate Industrial District would contain up to 153,000 square feet of corporate industrial uses on an approximately 17 acres site that would provide opportunities for office, warehouse and flex/tech type uses on site. The buildings would be limited to 28' foot clear interior height proportionally scaling these buildings with anticipated adjacent uses. The Chaska Creek High Bay Industrial District would contain up to 110,000 square feet of Industrial uses on an approximately 14.5 acre site. The Developers next steps will still require them to obtain preliminary and final site approvals before moving forward with the buildings. The exact components of the development will be dependent on market demand. The Developers have petitioned the City to construct the extension of Clover Ridge Drive through the site and down to Creek Road. Andy Heieie Land Sales & Acquisitions Direct 952 897 7816 1 Cell 612 910 2212 Main 952 897 7700 1 Fax 952 5418056 andy.heieie aacollierscom I View My Listings Colliers International I Minneapolis -St. Paul 4350 Baker Road I Suite 400 Minneapolis, MN 55343 www.colliers.com Aanenson, Kate From: Scott T Carlston <scott@carlston.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 11:17 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Fwd: Chaska Creek Kate, This is the project I want to get out in front of Scott Carlston 612.889.7898 Scott@carlston.com Begin forwarded message: From: "Heieie, Andy" <Andv.HeleleC3DcoIllers.com> Date: November 5, 2014 at 11:10:47 AM CST To: Scott Carlston <scottCbDcarlston.com>, "Cozine, Adam" <acozine@welshco.com> Subject: Chaska Creek Scott/Cozine, FYI Concept approved for Chaska Creek Business Park including a new Cub Foods On October 21st the Chaska City Council unanimously approved the concept plan for the Chaska Creek Business Park. The Chaska Creek Business Park is an 83-acre site that is located at the southwest corner of Trunk Highway 212 and Engler Boulevard (County Road 10). The project will be jointly developed by Opus Group & HJ Development. For some time, this property has been thought -of, planned, and guided for a mixed -use corporate industrial park that takes advantage of its strategic location and provides the community with a significant head of household jab base. The Business Park's mixed -use development contains 5 distinct "districts. " The site is bisected by a greenway which straddles Chaska Creek. The 5 districts are: Chaska Creek Retail District; Chaska Creek Professional Office District (Low-rise); Chaska Creek Professional Office District (Mid -rise); Chaska Creek Corporate Industrial District; and the Chaska Creek High -Bay Industrial District. The Chaska Creek Retail District is approximately 15 acres in size and is proposed to be anchored by a 50,000-square foot Cub Foods grocery store. The balance of the district would be geared towards neighborhood retail uses like: sit-down restaurants; banks; pharmacies; day care; dry cleaners; or barber/beauty shops. The Chaska Creek Low -Rise Professional Office Districts would contain up to 102,000 square feet of office use on approximately 10.5 acres and is proposed to encourage development of 1-3 story office buildings accompanied by surface parking lots for their users. The Chaska Creek Mid -Rise Professional Office District would contain up to 200,000 square feet of office use on an approximately 12 acres site and is proposed to encourage office development from 2 to 6 stories in height. The office building(s) is accompanied by either all surface parking or a combination of surface and structured parking for its users. The Chaska Creek Corporate Industrial District would contain up to 153,000 square feet of corporate industrial uses on an approximately 17 acres site that would provide opportunities for office, warehouse and flex/tech type uses on site. The buildings would be limited to 28' foot clear interior height proportionally scaling these buildings with anticipated adjacent uses. The Chaska Creek High Bay Industrial District would contain up to 110,000 square feet of Industrial uses on an approximately 14.5 acre site. The Developers next steps will still require them to obtain preliminary and final site approvals before moving forward with the buildings. The exact components of the development will be dependent on market demand. The Developers have petitioned the City to construct the extension of Clover Ridge Drive through the site and down to Creek Road. Andy Helele Land Sales & Acquisitions Direct 952 897 7816 1 Cell 612 910 2212 Main 952 897 7700 1 Fax 952 541 8056 andy.heieie(gbcolliers.com I View My Listings Colliers International I Minneapolis -St. Paul 4350 Baker Road I Suite 400 Minneapolis, MN 55343 www.coillers.com DRAFT Zoning/Permit Schedule The following is a tentative schedule for activities required from project initiation through the start of construction. The dates provided are estimated based on previous experience. The dates have not been reviewed with the City of Chanhassen and make assumptions about an expedited Metropolitan Council review in order to meet the client schedule. They are provided for informational purposes only. Any change or delay to one or more of the items will result in changes to the remainder of the schedule. October 20. 2014 Client authorizes work December 1, 2014 City Council Work Session Discussion of proposed development and AUAR December 8, 2014 City Council Authorizes Communhy Outreach AUAR Phasel December9. 2014 Concept Plan antl Comp Plan Amendment suDmatetl to City January 12. 2015 Revised AUAR submitted to Reviewing Agencies and EQB January 19, 2015 Notice published in EQB Monitor. January 20. 2015 Planning Commission TOOPM Meeting and Public Hearing on Concept Plan January 29, 2015 10 Day AUAR comment period complete. No objections: Review Over. RGU must adopt February 9. 2015 City Council adopts 7r00 PM Comp Plan Amendment and provides Concept Plan feedback February 10. 2015 Comp Plan Amendment Submitted to Met Council February 13, 2015 Application Submittal Deadline for PUD Rezoning, Preliminary I Final Plat March 6. 2015 Disputes IObjections to AUAR Resolved March 11, 2015 Padcs and Recreation 6:00 PM Meeting -to be confirmed with City March 17. 2015 Planning Commission 7,00 PM Meeting and Public Hearing March 25, 2015 EXPEDITED Met Councl Approval (60 Day Review Period Complete on April 15) April 6. 2015 City Councl Meetirrg 7:00 PM Aaemare Exfe: May I i^ May 2015 Final Plat Released4Apply for Building Permit WD1lW1- The DMMl 9 Vixxmt RYge L A N D F O a H tGIZVOM4 SM In..fi, m-ApreMdE Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. To: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director From: Brad Scheib, AICP, Vice President Subject: Proposal to perform an AUAR Update Date: 11 August 2014 This proposal is made in collaboration with Kimley-Horn Associates Inc. (KHA). KHA will provide expertise relative to traffic, sanitary sewer, potable water, and storm sewer systems per the attached work order. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. will provide land use planning, document preparations, project management, and public engagement assistance. The following key tasks are proposed: 1. Update development scenarios: Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKGi) will utilize the development scenarios updated in April of 2012 as a basis for the updated AUAR. Development and public improvements that have been completed since the original AUAR was completed will be documented, quantified, and added to the development scenarios as existing. Table 7.1 Project magnitude will be updated using a comprehensive GIS database as the source data. One workshop will be held with City Staff to confirm assumptions and details of the three scenarios. One round or modifications is assumed. 2. Review and Redline The current AUAR document: HKGi will review and update text of the current AUAR in regards to potential environmental impacts related to fish, wildlife and ecologically sensitive resources, surface and ground water resources, geologic resources, air quality, among others. 3. Review and Update The current mitigation plan: HKGi will review, mitigation strategies that have been completed and re-evaluate existing mitigation strategies based on the modified development scenario(s). New mitigation strategies will be established as appropriate. 4. Facilitate formal review process: The draft updated document will undergo a 30-day public notice period during which comments will be received. The draft updated document will then be revised to address the comments received. The finalized updated AUAR and mitigation plan will be distributed for final review. If no objections are filed by any state agency within 10 days, the documents will be adopted by the City of Chanhassen as the RGU. If objections are filed, resolution will be attempted or the Minnesota Environment Quality Board (EQB) will make a determination of adequacy. 5. Meetings and Project Management: HKGi will work with City staff to facilitate necessary meetings in the update process. This work plan assumes up to four meeting/workshop events conducted in Chanhassen to complete the AUAR update. HKGi also assumes frequent communications and correspondence with City staff in the updating of this AUAR. These meetings will be conducted via phone/video conference or in person as needed. AUAR update Schedule: It is anticipated that this update will take approximately six months to complete from notice to proceed. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401-1659 Ph (612) 338-0800 Fx (612) 338-6838 www.hkgi.com Direct (612) 252-7122 Email Brad@hkgi.com Chanhassen 2005 AUAR Update - Proposal 11 August 2014 Page 2 AUAR update budget Proposal: the above tasks will be completed for a fee of not to exceed $30,000 including expenses. It is assumed that expenses will be limited to mileage, plotting of presentation summary boards, and reproduction of draft documents. For this level of project, we estimate expenses at approximately $2,500, the bulk of which is with reproducing draft and final AUAR documents. This expense may be minimized by utilizing electronic PDF documents for distribution where accepted. Attached to this proposal is a work order proposed from KHA for transportation, infrastructure, and stormwater services. KHA can be directly contracted with the City or work as a sub -consultant to HKGi. The total fee estimate with HKGi and KHA is estimated at $74,820. l_ONCEPT 2 i.,+�ni19,Vn ..eM wamtrruncsuwswr wrr.w..wu...s enw� rm. KEY ELEMENTS: ► Corporate office sites near Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard Intersection and south of Highway 212. ► Smaller office sites organized around an enhanced existing wetland and at Isolated locations along Powers Boulevard. ► Regional commercial located near Powers Boulevard and Highway 212 with highway visibility. / Mixed use district located between office and regional commercial area along Bluff Creek Boulevard collector road extenslon. / Medium density residential along western boundary or north 116 acre area and nestled Into developable land between woodland preserve and creek ► Medium density residential located along PloneerTtall. ► High density housing south of collector road against preserved woodland, and located in the far southwest of the update area off of PloneerTrall. ► Collector road remains In planned configuration. F P, CONCEPT 1 a r ;R-awe KEY ELEMENTS: +wrtw�.rp a.sg0: P":'' "'"0"'0"""" ► Corporate office sites near Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard lip x! ' Intersection and south of Highway 212. ► Smaller convenience retail near intersectlonof Powers Boulevard and I collector roadway extenslon and near Intersection of PloneerTrall and Bluff Creek Drhre. e""',a _ ► Smaller office sites organized around existing wetland and portions of Bluff Creek along PluneerTrall. Ir ! 0 / Regional retail looted south of extended collector roadway with vislbillty from Highway 212. y ► Medium density residential along western boundary of north 116 acre area. ► High denslty nestled Into developable land between woodland . — - preserve and creek. ► High denslty housing south of collector road against preserved woodland. 'I ► Collector road remains In planned configuration. ,,,� ► Connection west to single family neighborhood remains In current location. 31 ► Additional roadway connection through woodland preserveto high demfty residential area. o • ► City Park developed around existing wetland complex as amenity for �,,,_:...: ,....:._.. .. office and medium denslty residential uses. a n. �n��e+la■�� y of Chanhassen Alternative Urban Areawide Review LY'Ma aLYD L�w�♦ ! f I .UY.T M�aM ira,l0f KEY ELEMENTS: D Two 30farce+ sites forreglonal retail uses. 10 Wetlands in center of site Integrated Into deve"ment'pattern. 1 Corporate office sites along Powers Boulevard both south of Highway 212. 1 Small office site near the Lyman Boulevard full access Intersection and scattered along the developable land near Pioneer Troll. 1 Medium density residential along western boundary of north 116 acres and nestled Into developable land between woodland preserve and creek High density housing In the far southwest portion of the update area with access off of Pioneer Trall. 10 Collector road shifts slightly north to create two regional retail sites and uses additional round -a -bout for traffic calming and access control. 60f2014 Events - Village Pointe Omaha 6VILLAGE ��OINTE MON - SAT LOAM - 9PM I SUN 12PM - 6PM SATU R DAY, J U N E 28 Village Pointe Farmers Market 8:OOA- 1:OOP Scheels Paddle Sport Demo Day 10:OOA- 3:OOP Come experience the latest in paddle boards and kayaks! View Event THE :.; vibes 6:30P-8:30P SUNDAY, JUNE 29 lululemon ® athletica lululemon 11:00A-12:00P Join lululemon for a Vibes Village Pointe Summer Concert Series Yoga at http://www.viliagepoinwshopping.convmbileteventsaspx 12 ACORD AGENCY CUSTOMER ID: 00001180 LGC w: ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Page of AGENCY H. Robert Anderson & Assoc., Inc. NAMED INSURED SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Suite ISO Minneapolis, MN 55447 POUCYNUMBER CARRIER NAIC CODE EFFECTIVE DATE: .U1I 1WNPU-RCmN fto THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: 25 FORM TITLE: ACORD Certificate of Liability Insurance CERTIFICATE HOLDER: City of Chanhassen Garage Liability INSR ADD-L SUER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LTR INSRD MD POLICY NUMBER DATE (MMIDDIYY) DATE (MMIDDM') LRITS AUTO ONLY -EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTO ONLY: AGG $ Automobile Liability ExcessfUmbrella Liability POLICY NUMBER POLICY NUMBER POLICY DA E (MMIDDm POLICY (NMIDD/YY) POLICYEFFECTIVE ATE (MMIDOIYY) PDAATY TE(YMIDDIYY) LIMITS (2008/01) C 2008 ACORD The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD ACORD CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: H. Robert Anderson & Assoc., Inc. PHONE 952.893.1933 1�,Mp:952.893.1819 AC NoIft 8201 Norman Center Drive E-N ADDRESS: Suite 220 INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NARM Bloomington, MN 55437 INSURER A: XL Specialty Insurance Co. 37885 INSURED SRF Consulting Grouo. Inc. One Carlson Parkway North Suite 150 Minneapolis, MN 55447 INSURER D : COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 2015 - 2016 1 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSW LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE L. NSR WVD POLICY NUMBER M UNITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ PREMISES (Ea oca,rrerlcs)S COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY MED EXP (Any one Person) S CLAIMS -MADE F71 OCCUR PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ GENL AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS -COMPIOP AGG S $ POLICY UPRO- LOC AUTOMOBILE LABILITY (Ea accident) E BODILY INJURY (Per Person) $ ANY AUTO ALL OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOS EO HIRED AUTOS AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per acadent) $ RCIFIERIYUANAUt Per ecadent S S UMBRELLA LAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE S AGGREGATE S EXCESS WAB CLAIMS -MADE DED I I RETENTIONS $ WORICERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETOWPARTNERIEXECUTNEM OFFICFRIMEMRER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) NIA TORY OMITS ER EL EACH ACCIDENT S E.L. DISEASE-EAB S tt yes describeunder DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT 1 $ rofesSional Liab Tty DPR9723967 07/0112015 07/0112016 Each Claim/ $10.000,000 A Annual Aggregate $10,000,000 DESCRPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (AU=h ACORD 101, AddMonal Remarks Schedule, H more space Is repaired) Project: County Road 61 Corridor Study This certificate or memorandum of insurance does not affirmatively or negatively amend, extend, or alter the coverage afforded by the insurance policy. [N ZIAif JWIN 9:1111:G . q_1: rd;If1_1111a1: SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. City of Chanhassen AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE /) /A/',.�,— 777' 2.ad� M. l/`r��`�^^, Attn: Kathryn Aanenson 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 9)1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rt9111S les INI'll ACORD 25 (2010105) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD •A� R& CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE s/2s/2o1sD THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsements . PRODUCER Marsh & McLennan Agency LLC Mina Northland Dr N MN 55428 CONTACT Anna Lisernan NAME: 763 74b B17D FAX 763 746 8370 @7fa9encies.com VDME , lissimana@Fjfagencies.com INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIL S INSURERA:ACCldent Fund Insurance 10166 INSURED SRFCO-1 INSURERB:Confinental Casualty CID 20443 SRF Consulting Group, Inc. One Carlson Parkway, #150 Minneapolis MN 55447 INSURERC: INSURER D INSURER E INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 202389376 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER NNDY EFF POLICY E%P LIMITS B X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE X� OCCUR 6018496289 6/302015 6/30/2016 EACH OCCURRENCE $1,000.000 PREMISES(Ea oax,mence $300,000 MED EXP (Any one person $5,000 PERSONAL A ADV INJURY $1,000,000 GENL X AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY ❑ JPCT T LOC OTHER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,000 PRODUCTS -COMP/OPAGG $2,000.000 s B AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL AUTSSVNED SCOESULED HIREDAUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS 6018496292 6l30/2015 6/30/2016 NED (Ea accident $1,000,000 X BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (PW accident) S PROPERTY DAMAGE$ Par caadent S B X UMBRELLALIAB EXCESS LIAR X OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE 6018496275 613OM15 6/302016 EACHOCCURRENCE $10,00D,ODD AGGREGATE $10.000,000 DEO IX I RETENTION 10.000 $ A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS, LIABILITY YIN PROPRIETOR/PARTNEWEXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑ (Mandatory in NH) n yos desa be under DESCRIPTION OFOPERATIONS below NINY WCV60752N 6/3M015 6/302016 X RTUTE oERTM E.L.E.EACH ACCIDENT S1,0001000 E.L. DISEASE - EA FJ.PLO 51,000,000 E-L DISEASE - POLICYLMMT S1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Addidonal Remarks Schedule, may be allachW H mom apace Is ranadrad) Re: Project: County Road 61 Corridor Study Certificate Holder is included as Additional Insured as required by written contract or agreement limited to the General Liability and Umbrella Liability coverage. City of Chanhassen Attn: Kathryn Aanenson 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REP ESENTATIV_ ACORD 25 (2014/01) /71988.2014 The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD All rights reserved. UMBRELLA' THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. AMENDMENT OF WHO IS AN INSURED This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL EXCESS LIABILITY (UMBRELLA) INSURANCE Paragraph 2.f. of SECTION II — WHO IS AN IN- SURED is deleted and replaced by the following: f. Any other person or organization insured under any policy of the "underlying insurance" listed in the SCHEDULE OF UNDERLYING INSURANCE of the DECLARATIONS of this insurance. This insurance is subject to all the provisions and limi- tations upon coverage under such policy of "un- derlying insurance", and, the limits of insurance afforded to such person or organization will be: (i) The difference between the "underlying in- surance" limits and the minimum limits of in- surance which you agreed to provide; or (ii) The limits of insurance of this policy whichever is less. UM 04 45 05 06 002a88 ® 2006 The St. Paul Travelers Companies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED (ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART A. The following is added to WHO IS AN INSURED (Section II): Any person or organization that you agree in a 'contract or agreement requiring insurance" to in- clude as an additional insured on this Coverage Part, but only with respect to liability for "bodily in- jury", "property damage" or "personal injury" caused, in whole or in part, by your acts or omis- sions or the acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf: a. In the performance of your ongoing opera- tions; b. In connection with premises owned by or rented to you; or c. In connection with "your work" and included within the "products -completed operations hazard". Such person or organization does not qualify as an additional insured for "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal injury" for which that per- son or organization has assumed liability in a con- tract or agreement. The insurance provided to such additional insured is limited as follows: d. This insurance does not apply on any basis to any person or organization for which cover- age as an additional insured specifically is added by another endorsement to this Cover- age Part. e. This insurance does not apply to the render- ing of or failure to render any "professional services". f. The limits of insurance afforded to the addi- tional insured shall be the limits which you agreed in that "contract or agreement requir- ing insurance" to provide for that additional insured, or the limits shown in the Declara- tions for this Coverage Part, whichever are less. This endorsement does not increase the limits of insurance stated in the LIMITS OF INSURANCE (Section III) for this Coverage Part. B. The following is added to Paragraph a. of 4. Other Insurance in COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS (Section IV): However, if you specifically agree in a "Contract or agreement requiring insurance" that the insurance provided to an additional insured under this Cov- erage Part must apply on a primary basis, or a primary and non-contributory basis, this insurance is primary to other insurance that is available to such additional insured which covers such addi- tional insured as a named insured, and we will not share with the other insurance, provided that: (1) The "bodily injury" or "property damage" for which coverage is sought occurs; and (2) The "personal injury' for which coverage is sought arises out of an offense committed; after you have entered into that "contract or agreement requiring insurance". But this insur- ance still is excess over valid and collectible other insurance, whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis, that is available to the insured when the insured is an additional insured under any other insurance. C. The following is added to Paragraph 8. Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us in COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CON- DITIONS (Section IV): We waive any rights of recovery we may have against any person or organization because of payments we make for "bodily injury', "property damage" or "personal injury' arising out of "your work" performed by you, or on your behalf, under a "contract or agreement requiring insurance" with that person or organization. We waive these rights only where you have agreed to do so as part of the "contract or agreement requiring insur- ance" with such person or organization entered into by you before, and in effect when, the "bodily CG D3 81 09 07 © 2007 The Travelers Companies, Inc. Page 1 of 2 Induces :he copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY injury" or "property damage' occurs, or the "per- sonal injury" offense is committed. D. The following definition is added to DEFINITIONS (Section V): "Contract or agreement requiring insurance" means that part of any contract or agreement un- der which you are required to include a person or organization as an additional insured on this Gov- erage Part, provided that the "bodily injury" and "property damage" occurs, and the "personal in- jury" is caused by an offense committed: a. After you have entered into that contract or agreement, b. While that part of the contract or agreement is in effect; and c. Before the end of the policy period. Page 2 of 2 ® 2007 The Travelers Companies, Inc. CG 03 81 09 07 Includes the copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its pennission Musoums in rvaw TOM. n♦ Gat Dir•ctionr HI•tory '17305 Davenport St, Village Pointe, Omaha, NE 68118, USA .. . ,1, aaa �a�•��4[ r '` N •pig— �' ri 8 X Paces,. 7�y My Places ; .: 't k_ .j Y j0 r • `' �p Q_ghtseelno Tour _ \(p ' • . t `1l1 Make sure ck Buildings II01_ 1—�w�,.,�J7 layer is checked � IFuFS•• �. M '4 - 'it r .wa , 1 CD Temporary Places • • h fl sl 1 rP yy t I, avers Eanh Gall" t. Primary Database ry Earth Pro (US) 1-Af Borders and Labels -/O Places IV- Photos Jb9 Roads I-" 30 Buildings i—V Ocean } weather Gallery Line Path Circle 3D path 3D polygon j Measure the distance or area of a geometric shape on the ground Perimeter: 6,265.21 Feel Area: 66.76 Acres I,A Mouse Navigation Save Clear i aqi i i{t