The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-06_CSAH 61 CORRIDOR IN CHANHASSEN• I S— coS„ June 1, 2015 Ms. Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan Amendment — CSAH 61 Corridor Metropolitan Council Review File No. 20265-8 Metropolitan Council District 4 Dear Ms. Aanenson: At its meeting on March 27, the Metropolitan Council reviewed the City's Comprehensive Plan Amendment (amendment), based on the staff report. The amendment reguides approximately 288 acres from office and office industrial land uses to residential medium and high density and mixed land uses located along the CSAH 61 corridor as a key southern gateway to the City. The purpose of the amendment is to incorporate the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study into the comprehensive plan. The Council found that the amendment conforms to the regional system plans for transportation, wastewater, and parks; is consistent with the 2030 Regional Development Framework and Council policies; and is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions. Therefore, the City may place the amendment into effect. A copy of the staff report to the Council is attached for your records. The Council will append the amendment, submission form and supplemental information to the City's plan in the Council's files. If you have any questions, please contact Angela R. Torres, Principal Reviewer at 651-602-1566. Sincerely, Attachment CC: Crystal Sheppeck, Minnesota Housing Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT Metro Deb Barber, Metropolitan Council District 4 Angela R. Torres, Sector Representative/Principal Reviewer Raya Esmaeili, Reviews Coordinator N:ICommDevILPAIConommitieslChanhaswnUeners110141Chmdwsen 2015 CPA 20265-8 CSAH 61 PoslCo iUctiondo SCANNED METROPOLITAN C O U N C I L 10 Committee Report Business Item No. 2015-101 Community Development Committee For the Metropolitan Council meeting of May 27, 2015 Subject: City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No. 20265-8 Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council: 1. Adopt the attached review record and allow the City of Chanhassen to place the CSAH 61 Corridor comprehensive plan amendment (CPA) into effect. 2. Find that the CPA does not change the City's forecasts. Summary of Committee Discussion/Questions This business item was approved as part of the committee meeting's consent agenda with no questions or discussion. Page - 1 AL METROPOLITAN C 0 U N C I L Ousiness Item No. 2015-101 Community Development Committee Meeting date: May 11, 2015 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of May 27, 2015 Subject: City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No. 20265- 8 District(s), Member(s): District 4, Deb Barber Policy/Legal Reference: Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minn. Stat. § 473.175) Staff Prepared/Presented: Angela R. Torres, AICP, Senior Planner, Local Planning Assistance (651-602- 1566) Commu Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council: 1. Adopt the attached review record and allow the City of Chanhassen to place the CSAH 61 Corridor comprehensive plan amendment (CPA) into effect. 2. Find that the CPA does not change the City's forecasts. Background The Council reviewed the City's Comprehensive Plan Update (Business Item 2008-206, Review File No. 20265-1) on October 22, 2008. This is the City's eighth CPA since the review of the Update. The CPA proposes to amend the local comprehensive plan to reguide approximately 288 acres from office and office industrial land uses to residential medium density. high density, and mixed use land uses. The property is located along the CSAH 61 corridor as a key southern gateway to the City. The purpose of the amendment is to incorporate the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study results into the comprehensive plan. Rationale The proposed CPA conforms to regional system plans, is consistent with Council policies, and is compatible with the plans of other local communities and school districts. Funding None. Known Support / Opposition None known. Page - 2 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Review Record City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review File No. 20265-8, Council Business Item No. 2015-102 BACKGROUND The City of Chanhassen (City) is located in eastern Carver County, surrounded by the cities of Eden Prairie and Shorewood (Hennepin County), Chaska and Victoria (Carver County), and Shakopee and Jackson Township (Scott County). Consistent with the policies adopted by the Council in June 2014 (Business Item 2014-143) regarding review of local comprehensive plans, this amendment is being reviewed under the 2030 Regional Development Framework (RDF) and its policy plans. The 2030 Regional Development Framework (RDF) identifies the City as a Developing community. The Metropolitan Council (Council) forecasts that the City will grow between 2010 and 2030 from 27,500 to 38,000 people, from 10,200 to 14,800 households, and that employment will grow from 13,000 to 15,600 jobs. The Council reviewed the City's Update, Review File No. 20265-1, on October 27, 2008. The City has submitted six comprehensive plan amendments (CPAs). Three of those amendments made minor land use changes, one amendment made minor text and map changes to the transportation section, and one amendment identified approved road reclassifications. These CPAs met the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Administrative Guidelines revised by the Council on July 28, 2010, and have been allowed to be placed into effect under those guidelines. The City also submitted a CPA to adopt the Chanhassen Apartments CPA to reguide land in support of a 155-unit apartment development (Review File No. 20265-5). The Council reviewed the amendment on July 15, 2013, and the amendment was allowed to be put into effect. This is the City's seventh proposed amendment to their 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update. REQUEST SUMMARY The CPA proposes to amend the local comprehensive plan to reguide approximately 288 acres from office and office industrial land uses to residential medium density, high density, and mixed use land uses located along the CSAH 61 corridor as a key southern gateway to the City. The purpose of the amendment is to incorporate the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study into the comprehensive plan. OVERVIEW Conformance with The CPA conforms to the Regional System Plans for Parks, Transportation Regional Systems (including Aviation), and Wastewater, with no substantial impact on, or departure from, these plans. Consistency with The CPA is consistent with the Council's RDF, with water resources Council Policies management, and is consistent with Council forecasts. Page - 3 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Compatibility with Plans The•A will not have an impact on adjacen•mmunities, school districts, of Adjacent or watershed districts, and is compatible with the plans of those districts. Jurisdictions PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTIONS • The Council acted on the City's Update on October 27, 2008 (Review File No. 20265-1). • West One CPA was administratively approved by the Council on November 9, 2009 (Review File No. 20265-2). • Land Use and Transportation CPA was administratively approved by the Council on February 14, 2011 (Review File No. 20265-3). • Road Reclassification CPA was administratively approved by the Council on May 3, 2013 (Review File No. 20265-4). • The Chanhassen Apartments CPA was approved by the Council on July 24, 2013 (Review File 20265-5). • The Preserve at Rice Lake CPA was administratively approved by the Council on September 12, 2013 (Review File No. 20265-6). • Arbor Cove CPA was administratively approved by the Council on May 20, 2014 (Review File No. 20265-7). ISSUES I. Does the amendment conform to the regional system plans? ll. Is the amendment consistent with the RDF and other Council policies? III. Does the amendment change the City's forecasts? IV. Is the amendment compatible with the plans of adjacent local governmental units and affected jurisdictions? ISSUES ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Conformance with Regional Systems The CPA conforms to the regional system plan for Regional Parks, Transportation, and Wastewater, with no substantial impact on, or departure from, these system plans. Consistency with Council Policy The CPA is consistent with Council policies for forecasts, land use, housing, sub -surface sewage treatment systems, and water supply. Additional review comments regarding consistency with land use and housing policies are detailed below. Land Use Reviewer.' Angela R. Torres (651-602-1566) The 2030 Regional Development Framework identifies the City as a Developing community, and directs Developing communities to support sewered residential development at densities of at least 3 units per acre. The CPA proposes to reguide approximately 288 acres from office and office industrial land uses to residential medium density, high density, and mixed use land uses located along the CSAH 61 corridor as a key southern gateway to the City. The purpose of the amendment is to incorporate the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study into the comprehensive plan. The land use changes Page-4 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL allow for the potential future roelopment of the corridor. As shown i0ble 1 and illustrated in Figure 3, the City is reguiding a number of different properties. Table 1: Detailed Land Use Changes along CSAH 61 20265-8 CSAH 61 Corridor CPA Acres Guiding Change 58.96 Office to Residential Medium Density 107.34 Office to Parks 17.09 Residential Large Lot to Residential Medium Density 9.21 Office to Residential Medium Density 11.07 Office to Mixed (70%Res/30%Comm) 15.58 Office Industrial to Mixed (70%Res/30%Comm) 16.86 Office Industrial to Residential High Density 7.62 Office Industrial to Parks The City's Update, with previous amendments, has a planned minimum residential density of 3.73 units per acre. Consistent with the Council's MUSA Implementation Guidelines, communities participating in the Plat Monitoring Program (PMP) receive credit for development platted beginning in the year 2000. Since 2000, the City has approved residential developments with an overall average density of 4.7 units per acre. The City has a combined overall density of 4.3 units per acre, consistent with the Council's policy for sewered residential development in Developing communities. Table 2. Residential Density Calculation for Planned Residential Land Uses Category Density Range Min Max Acres Min Units Max Units Low Density Residential 1.2 4 171.61 206 686 Medium Density Residential 4 8 148.49 594 1188 High Density Residential 8 16 65.9 527 1055 Mixed Use 8 20 26.65 213 533 TOTALSi 34 Oeeraf Density 3.73 839 Plat Monitoring Totals 2013 570.1 2682 4.70 CPU and Plat Monitoring Total 982.8 4222 4.30 Housing Reviewer: Angela R. Torres (651-602-1566) The CPA is consistent with the Council's policy for housing. The City's share of the region's affordable housing need is 1,166 units. With this amendment, the City has over 493 acres available guided at densities high enough to support this need. This amendment adds 129 new acres to land guided to support their affordable housing allocation. Compatibility with Plans of Adjacent Governmental Units and Plans of Affected Special Districts and School Districts The proposed CPA is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions. No compatibility issues with plans of adjacent governmental units and plans of affected special districts and school districts were identified. Page - 5 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ATTACHMENTS • • Figure 1: Location Map Showing Regional Planning Areas Figure 2: Location Map showing Regional Systems Figure 3: Current and Proposed Land Use Guiding Page - 6 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Figure 1: Location Map Gowing Regional Planning Aree rMIDNN RD a°_ r Minnetrista ! Shorewood a, Minnetonka jPv-TMNLIHE RD nl�L--SiT, f G- 9F Victoria o - v LAketown ' Twp. a' Dahlgren TwP. aY _ o 9 - _ VA[� VIEIy _ o D _fie _WAYf 7a STW p Chanhassen A o O �ENIG NEIG1Rb¢: --IT 2 9 � F- if Eden ; - County Road 61 -_� - - Prairie - Corridor Amendment Area Chaska CWNry Rp�pr b 157 AVER _ RM Aviv ickson f Shakopee �T 64HA EW N CEfC.f 1pR1 ,OTNPVEE �kB(yC�AVEW:- ,OTRPVEE �kB(yCE e0 0.5 1 1.5 3 2.5 W lee 2030 Framework Planning Areas Developed Developing Rural Center Rural Growth Center Divemified Rural Rural Residential __. Agricultural Non Region Ncompass Street Centedines Page-7 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Figure 2. Location Map towing Regional Systems 0 Victoria Y CR Et G,SGb IN t Chan County Road 61 Con dor AmandmentArea Pgj Shakopee bm ^vEw rn t� not ^vEE 1 6 Y �F w Q Hn EE I c`r....�^`h W _ 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 i.5 3 e Wes Regional Systems Wastewater Services Recreation Open Space (]e Mebrs Pak Reserve ® un Stations Re Tonal Park MCES InM ptors Speoal Recreation FeaWre BMCES Treatment Plarda Regional Trails -_,. Fysnng Transportation _ _ Planned INEEN aft,states —US HQM ys Ncompass Sbeet Cerderloea � Stata Highways --- County Roads Page - 8 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL • Figure 3: Current and Proposed Land Use Guiding County Road 61 Corridor Study Current 2030 Land Use -- -- "W2 ivaenwueae�a ■aoe.ev.�ummrr IIa0151ri12 (I It % - Syy . take ' OWW,2 County Road 61 Corridor Study Proposed Land Use Page-9 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 9-3 CITY OF CHANHAS4EI1 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Fax:952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone:952.2271160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone:952.227.1140 Fax:952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone.952.227.1120 Fax:952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax:952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone.952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Fax:952.2271110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director February 23, 2015 7�� 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendments CSAH 61 Corridor — Planning Case 2015-06 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the Land Use Map Amendments within the CSAH 61 Corridor and the corresponding amendments to Figures 2- and 2-2 of the Land Use Element." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study suggested alternate land uses based on a parcel -by -parcel analysis of the sites prepared by Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKGi) resulting in recommendations for the potential development of approximately 200 acres along the corridor. City Council must decide if they want to approve the land use map changes and submit them to the Metropolitan Council for review. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 3, 2015 to review the proposed comprehensive plan amendments. The Planning Commission voted 4 to 0 to recommend that City Council approve the land use amendments and revisions to Figures 2-1 and 2-2 with a recommendation to look at future uses for the Moon Valley site as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update. Planning Commission minutes for February 3, 2015 are included in the consent agenda for the February 23, 2015, City Council packet. Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendments within the CSAH 61 corridor. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution. 2. Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 3, 2015. 3. Email from Danny Chuka to Bob Generous dated February 4, 2015 g:\plau\2015 phoning cases\2015-06 csah 61 land use amendment\exmt tive summary.doe Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: February 23, 2015 RESOLUTION NO: 2015- MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION APPROVING LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS WITHIN THE CSAH 61 CORRIDOR TO THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study was finalized and approved by the City Council on October 28, 2014. A joint meeting with City Council and the Planning Commission was held on December 1, 2014 to review the CSAH 61 Corridor study results. WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen submitted the proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendments within the CSAH 61 Corridor to adjacent communities on December 12, 2014, for their review. There were no objections or negative comments received. The 60-day agency review period ended on February 10, 2015. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to review the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendments on February 3, 2015, found the amendments consistent with the City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan and voted to recommend that City Council adopt the amendments. WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council held a hearing on February 23, 2015 to review the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council approves the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendments within the CSAH 61 Corridor subject to review and determination of consistency with the Metropolitan Council 2030 System Plan. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 23`d day of February, 2015. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT - 1) -a CITY of CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone:952.227.1180 Fax:952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone:952.227,1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 Fax 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 Fax:952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone:952.227.1130 Fax:952.2271110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director } DATE: Febntary 3, 2015 SUBJ: 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendments CSAH 61 Corridor — Planning Case 2015-06 PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the Land Use Map Amendments within the CSAH 61 Corridor and the corresponding amendments to Figures 2-1 and 2-2 of the Land Use Element." PROPOSAL The County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 61 Corridor is a key southern gateway to the City of Chanhassen. Impending transportation and infrastructure changes can increase the development potential of parcels within the corridor. The city completed a framework plan that will guide future public and private -sector decision making, shaping this important city gateway. The City of Chanhassen initiated the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study to investigate future land use recommendations consistent with the gateway's importance. An updated land use vision for the study area will enable the city to better guide future development that will: • Achieve the highest and best use for properties • Be responsive to the study area's unique natural setting • Enhance the city's tax base • Create a southern gateway to the city Updated land uses will also provide existing property owners with a better understanding of the city's long-term vision for this area. This will allow them to make informed decisions regarding the future use, management, or disposition of their property. The city envisions future development along the CSAH 61 Corridor that reflects the city's high -quality architecture and site design standards, resulting in a pleasant and inviting gateway. Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED Planning Commission CSAH 61 Corridor — Land Use Map Amendments February 3, 2015 Page 2 The Planning Commission's duties include the preparation of a comprehensive plan for the future development of the city and recommendation of amendments of the plan to the city council (Section 20-46.03 (d) (1) of the Chanhassen City Code).On December 12, 2014, the proposed land use map amendments were submitted to adjacent communities for jurisdictional review. The 60-day review period ends on February 10, 2015. The CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study was finalized and approved by the City Council on October 28, 2014. Staff has been directed to bring the recommended alternate land uses forward through the public hearing process. A joint meeting with City Council and the Planning Commission was held on December 1, 2014 to review the CSAH 61 Corridor study results. A parcel -by -parcel analysis of the site was completed by Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKGi) resulting in recommendations for the potential development of approximately 200 acres along the corridor. The sewer and water study by Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) was completed and determined that utility extension is financially feasible for the corridor. This corridor and the surrounding land are challenging for development because of the topography, natural and environmental features, and land ownership. These features also create opportunities for unique development. CSAH 61/Minnesota River Crossing �- - HIGHWAY 101 COUNT' ROAD 61 J I'_ FLOOD MITIGATION PRQIECf,_ / p j 4 �r The Highway 101 river crossing is currently under construction. The new bridge will provide four traffic lanes as well as a pedestrian/bicycle lane. The bridge is being raised to be above the 100-year flood elevation. CSAH 61 is being upgraded to improve traffic flow within the corridor. Roundabouts are being installed at the intersections of the Highway 101 river crossing and Bluff Creek Drive. Planning Commission CSAH 61 Corridor — Land Use Map Amendments February 3, 2015 Page 3 aati p�-•."e�R �e." �. .. 1 CSAH 61 in Hennepin County is also being proposed for upgrades to the Flying Cloud Airport in Eden Prairie. The two-lane roadway will provide enhanced traffic movements as well as being raised out of the 100-year flood elevation along portions of its route. A regional trail is included as part of the project. Highway 101 If federal funding is secured, the earliest Highway 101 could be reconstructed is 2018. If the project does not rank high enough to be federally funded, state funds would need to be secured. State tumback funds are currently over programmed and are not available for about 10 years. Planning Commission CSAH 61 Corridor — Land Use Map Amendments February 3, 2015 Page 4 State bonding or an influx of money into the state tumback account is thought to be the only other avenue to advance this project if federal funds are not secured. The preliminary schedule is as follows: Start Environmental Documentation and Preliminary Design ................. September 2014 Federal Solicitation Project Applications Due...........................................November 2014 Notification of Federally Selected Projects ..................................................... Spring 2015 Environmental Documentation and Preliminary Design Work .......................... Fall 2015 Right of Way Acquisition............................................................................................2017 ConstructionStart ........................................................................................................2018 UTILITIES The CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study also analyzed whether sewer and water service extension was feasible within the area. Schematics of the sewer and water extension are shown below. DP LB 3 LA SUllon l° 1 y�s rrE Cents Arsa ` +.^•• A� r OOB3 MGD �'r• Nosh West \ c r l-Shared Center Lrfl Stabs GfeM Area Shared West Arta 0,27 MGD \ 0070 MGD / Ar, Area South West Ltfl Station 0,397 MGD Legend - Eatstng Ltfl Staums - - south Wesl Growth Area Future Lift$b0ore 0. 787 MGD -.. Ecstng Gmvrty Sewer ► Futo a Grawry Sewer Future Force M&n Shared West �_- Shared Center - East Growth Area 1 NW Growth Area •t Growth Area Planning Commission CSAH 61 Corridor — Land Use Map Amendments February 3, 2015 Page 5 •-„_ter .�� :, IIIIII��ii�•��►i. �� ` Il/ll\1■II The study findings indicated that extending city utilities to the study area is feasible. This study outcome, along with finding that the assumed densities used in the feasibility study, showed that this area could generate sufficient revenue to fund the extension. The extension of sewer to CSAH 61 is contingent upon sewer being extended across Bluff Creek Golf Course. Additionally, a central lift station just south of Highway 212 on Powers Boulevard is necessary to serve southern Chanhassen. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Map Amendments The goal of the city is to create a mixture of land uses that provide a high quality of life and a reliable tax base. We have a very successful downtown, business industrial parks, and residential developments, and there is additional opportunity for other centers of development within the city. o Alternative scenario based on roadway improvements and access changes: ■ Medium Density Residential — Density range is 4-8 units/acre (development scenarios assume 6 units/acre). Generally includes attached side -by -side multi -family or small -lot single-family residential uses. Appropriate zonings include R-4, R-8, RLM, and PUD-R Planning Commission CSAH 61 Corridor — Land Use Map Amendments February 3, 2015 Page 6 ■ High Density Residential — Density range is 8-16 units/acre (development scenarios assume 10 units/acre). Generally includes attached side -by -side or stacked multi -family building types. Appropriate zonings include R-8, R-12, and R-16 or PUD-R ■ Neighborhood/Convenience Commercial— small-scale 10,000 square -foot maximum per single user — NOTE THIS IS CURRENTLY IDENTIFIED AS AN ASTERISK IN THE COMP PLAN — appropriate zonings include BN and PUD Mixed Use Village land use pattern — 70/30 residential -to -retail use mix... combination of MDR and NCC — could be horizontal or vertical mix of uses — PUD implementation Land Use Density Assumptions Other Assumptions Non -Residential Uses Low Range AR High Range AR Average AR) Jobs (Employees per 1000 SF Office 0.2 0.3 0.25 4 Office/industry 0.3 0.5 0.35 2 Neighborhood Commercial 0.25 0.35 0.3 4 Residential Uses Low Range /A High Range /A Average /A Population erso Medium Density 4 8 6 2.5 High Density 8 16 10 2 The intersection of Highway 101 and CSAH 61 is envisioned as the key community gateway. Parcels immediately east and west of the intersection and north of CSAH 61 are proposed to be guided as mixed -use village. This area would be composed of neighborhood -convenience retail and services, complemented with some high and medium -density residential. Map Area 1 Planning Commission CSAH 61 Corridor — Land Use Map Amendments February 3, 2015 Page 7 The entire area is being proposed for a change to residential land use from office use. The city does not anticipate as great a demand for office land within the community as was currently guided in the 2030 Land Use Plan. These properties could be developed in conjunction with or in coordination with the abutting properties. Assumption Creek segments all the parcels in this area, which is a Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR)-designated trout stream. Any structured crossings of the creek would require approval by the DNR. Ideally, the land north of Assumption Creek would be preserved as permanent open space and the density transferred south of the creek, avoiding the need for crossing the creek. Residential uses in this area can take advantage of the adjacent river bluff and Seminary Fen natural amenities. All site access must come off CSAH 61. PID 250340100 Owner: Gary W. Dungey Amend property from Office to Residential — Medium Density. Site: 7.4 acres This property is bisected by Assumption Creek. PID 250340200 Amend property from Office to Residential — Medium Density. Owner: Edward A. Kocourek This property contains a single-family home and is surrounded on Site: 1.22 acres two sides by farm fields. Amend property from Office to Residential — Medium Density. PID 250340400 This property contains an old farmstead with a house and Owner: High Terrace LLC outbuildings. An old farm road accesses the northern portion of Site: 30.86 acres the property. Significant wooded areas along Assumption Creek bisect the property. PID 250350100 Amend property from Office to Residential — Medium Density. Owner: High Terrace LLC This property is currently undeveloped. Access to the northern Site: 8.15 acres portion of the site has been through the property to the west. PID 250350110 Amend property from Office to Residential — Medium Density. Owner: High Terrace LLC This property is currently undeveloped. Access to the northern Site: 11.33 acres portion of the site has been through the property to the west. Planning Commission CSAH 61 Corridor — Land Use Map Amendments February 3, 2015 Page 8 Map Area 2 The entire area is being proposed for a change to Parks and Open Space use from Office. This area contains portions of the seminary fen. The majority of these parcels are either wet meadow or shrub swamp wetlands. All but the most easterly parcel are owned by public agencies. PID 250340420 Amend property from Residential Large Lot to Parks and Owner: State of Minnesota — DNR Open Space. The majority of this site is wetland. It also Site: 7.98 acres contains portions of the Seminary Fen. PID 250350111 Amend property from Residential Large Lot to Parks and Owner: State of Minnesota — DNR Open Space. The majority of this site is wetland. It also Site: 82.2 acres contains portions of the Seminary Fen. Amend property from Residential Large Lot to Parks and PID 250350112 Open Space. Assumption Creek runs along the northern Owner: State of Minnesota — DNR edge of the property. It also contains portions of the Site: 11.18 acres Seminary Fen. This site is where the seminary used to be located. PID 250351000 Amend property from Residential Large Lot to Parks and Owner: Louise E. Zajahn Open Space. The majority of this site is wetland. It also Site: 5.06 acres contains portions of the Seminary Fen. PID 250351100 Amend property from Residential Large Lot to Parks and Owner: City of Chanhassen Open Space. A portion of this site is wetland. It also Site: 0.92 acres contains portions of the Seminary Fen. Planning Commission CSAH 61 Corridor — Land Use Map Amendments February 3, 2015 Page 9 Map Area 3 These parcels are being proposed to amend from Residential Large Lot to Residential Medium Density. The western portion of this area consists of wetlands and portions of the seminary fen. PID 250350500 Amend property from Residential Large Lot to Owner: Harold F. Hess Residential Medium Density. The western half of the site Site: 16 acres contains wetlands and portions of the seminary fen. PID 250350800 Amend property from Residential Large Lot to Owner: James Robert Skaggs Residential Medium Density. This site contains an old Site: 1.09 acres house and outbuildings. At one time, this property had been used as a bed and breakfast. Map Area 4 These parcels are proposed to be amended from Office to Residential Medium Density land uses. Planning Commission CSAH 61 Corridor — Land Use Map Amendments February 3, 2015 Page 10 Amend from Office to Residential Medium Density. This parcel PID 250350500 represents the eastern half of the Hesse property that continues on Owner: Harold F Hesse the west side of Bluff Creek Drive. A potential bluff area separates Site: 5.88 acres the northern part of the property from the southern portion. Development would be limited to the area below the bluff. PID 250350700 Amend from Office to Residential Medium Density. This parcel Owner: Brian J Johnson contains a single-family home and detached garage. The southern Site: 3.33 acres half of the property contains steep slopes which may be a bluff. Map Area 5 These parcels are proposed for amendment from Office to Mixed Use. The mixed use land use includes multi -family residential and commercial uses. The intent for this area is to create an urban village where residents can walk to convenience -type commercial uses. The southerly two-thirds of the area is relatively flat. The northerly third of the area is composed of steep slopes. This area is envisioned as a southern gateway to the City of Chanhassen. The existing Highway 101 roadway will be realigned to the east. PID 250351710 Amend from Office to Mixed use. This site currently contains a Owner: Christopher Hagen garden center. This site provides an opportunity to incorporate a Site: 8.12 acres mix of residential and commercial uses. PID 250351810 Owner: Amend from Office to Mixed use. This site currently contains a Skip Cook Site: 2.88 Acres single-family home and outbuildings. This property should develop in conjunction with adjacent properties. PID 256010030 Owner: Amend from Office to Mixed use. This site is vacant and is a PCH Development, LLC remnant of property from the land east of Highway 101. Site: 0.07 acres Planning Commission CSAH 61 Corridor — Land Use Map Amendments February 3, 2015 Page 11 Map Area 6 These parcels are currently on the east side of Highway 101. With the realignment of Highway 101, the middle parcel will be split. This area is proposed for amendment from Office Industrial to Mixed Use. The intent for this area is to create an urban village where residents can walk to convenience -type commercial uses. The southerly two-thirds of the area is relatively flat. The northerly third of the area is composed of steep bluffs. This area is envisioned as a southern gateway to the City of Chanhassen. The commercial uses will benefit from the residential high - density uses proposed to the east. Planning Commission CSAH 61 Corridor — Land Use Map Amendments February 3, 2015 Page 12 PID 250351300 Amend from Office Industrial to Mixed Use. This property Owner: Skip S. Cook contains small cabins and spots for trailer parking. Bluff Creek Site: 2.14 acres runs along the eastern side of the property. PID 250351310 Owner: State of Minnesota — DNR Amend from Office Industrial to Mixed Use. This property abuts Site: 0.57 acres CSAH 61 and Highway 101 around the property to the north. PID 256010010 Owner: PCH Development, LLC Amend from Office to Mixed use. This site contains a dog Site: 2.88 acres kennel. PID 256010020 Owner: PCH Development, LLC Amend from Office to Mixed use. This site contains a stable and Site: 9.99 acres Pasture area for horses. Map Area 7 This area is being proposed for amendment from Office Industrial to Residential High Density land uses. The residential land use can take advantage of the natural amenities including a steep slope to the north and the views of the Minnesota River floodplain to the south. Planning Commission CSAH 61 Corridor — Land Use Map Amendments February 3, 2015 Page 13 PID 250360500 Amend from Office Industrial to Residential High Density. This Owner: City of Chanhassen property is currently vacant. Site: 2.35 acres PID 250360700 Amend from Office Industrial to Residential High Density. This Owner: Beatrice Zwiers property is currently vacant. The site is the western portion of a Irrevocable Trust larger parcel with eastern portion currently guided for Residential Site: 5.29 acres High Density uses. Access to three houses is gained across this parcel. PID 250360710 Amend from Office Industrial to Residential High Density. This Owner: Lonnie Ford Site: r: acres property contains a single-family home. PID 250361000 Owner: State of Minnesota — DNR Amend from Office Industrial to Residential High Density. This Site: 0.24 acres property is immediately adjacent to lying Cloud Drive. PID 250361300 Owner: J T Investments, LLC Amend from Office Industrial to Residential High Density. This Site: 1.99 acres property contains an automobile sales lot. PID 250362800 Owner: Michael S. Spiess Amend from Office Industrial to Residential High Density. This Site: 0.6 acres property contains a single-family home. PID 250363100 Owner: Alvin R. Lebens Amend from Office Industrial to Residential High Density. This Site: 0.61 acres property contains a single-family home. PID 257980010 Amend from Office Industrial to Residential High Density. This Owner: P R Kelly Properties, LLC property contains a storage building. Conditional Use Permit Site: 4.87 acres #86-01 governs the use of the property. Planning Commission CSAH 61 Corridor — Land Use Map Amendments February 3, 2015 Page 14 Map Area 8 These parcels are being proposed for amendment from Office Industrial to Parks and Open Space. These lands are periodically flooded and are surrounded on the west, south and east by land within the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife area. These sites have the potential as trail heads or parking areas for visitors to the wildlife area. PID 250361100 Amend from Office Industrial to Parks and Open Space. Owner: The Western Motel, LLC This property contains a motel. Site: 1.88 acres PID 250363700 Amend from Office Industrial to Parks and Open Space. Owner: Larry Hopfenspirger This property contains a car dealership. Site: 0.53 acres Map Area 9 Planning Commission CSAH 61 Corridor — Land Use Map Amendments February 3,2015 Page 15 This area is being proposed for amendment from Office Industrial to Parks and Open Space. These lands are periodically flooded and are surrounded on the west, south and east by land within the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife area. Portions of the existing automobile salvage yard soil are likely contaminated. If the site transitions away from its current use in the future, soil remediation is anticipated. PID 250363000 This parcel is being proposed for amendment from Office Owner: Lavonne S. Dallman Industrial to parks and open space. These lands are periodically Site: 5.21 acres flooded and are surrounded on the west, south and east by Land within the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife area. Land Use — Chapter 2 The proposed changes in the land use map will result in changes to Figures 2-1 and 2-2. These figures show the cumulative total of each land use as well as the consumption of these land uses over time. The revised figures are attached to the report. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendments as outlined above. ATTACHMENTS 1. County Road 61 Corridor Study Current and Proposed 2030 Land Use Map. 2. County Road 61 Land Use Amendment Parcels. 3. Figure 2-1 Land Use Table in Five Year Stages. 4. Figure 2-2 2008 — 2030 Land Use Comparison. 5. Notice to Affected Property Owners Affidavit of Mailing. 6. Public Hearing Notice Postcard and Affidavit of Mailing. gAp1an12015 plmming cwc \2015-06 csah 61 Imd ace amau m Asuff report 1u doc County Road 61 Corridor Study Current Legend COMMERICAL OFFICE OFFICE INDUSTRIAL MIXED RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY F—C--] AGRICULTURE PARKS OPEN SPACE PUBLIC SEMI PUBLIC 2030 Landuse C V it It. 11C V V V. lz� 4% It% V V. It., S V C% r� V V It, V c IP It It V V C, It. c C. C. C. It C V C It It% It C. C" V V V V 9* C. V C;It% It% K> q, V IP V • . S. K. K. K. . . K. G. K. K. K. K. /It, Ica It., It It It It , , lc' It lc' It It It lt: It% G. V C� It� lt� 9. V I V V lt� C. V V lt� t� C. It% It, i Ic. V It % It It C.- It G C:. C 4 > S:. {:. C:. C C> {: C% 4 S C> 1;% /.� It County Road 61 Corridor Study Um Lake OHW 699.2 Rice Lake OHW 699.2 Proposed Landuse County Road 61 Land Use Amendment Parcels Ma Grou I 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 PID Taxpayer Name 250340100 GARY W DUNGEY 250340200 EDWARD A KOCOUREK 250340400 HIGH TERRACE LLC 250350100 HIGH TERRACE LLC 250350110 HIGH TERRACE LUC 250340420 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 250350111 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 250350112 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 2503510001 LOUISE E ZAMIAHN ETAL 250351100 CHANHASSEN CITY 250350500 HAROLD F HESSE 250350800 JAMES ROBERT SKAGGS 250350500 HAROLD F HESSE 250350700 BRIAN J JOHNSON Taxpayer Address T er City-St2teZip Property Address I Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use 'GIs 1539 INDEPENDENCE AVE CHASKA, MN 55318-1665 1850 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Residential Medium Density 3804 22ND AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407-3C 1800 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Residential Medium Density PO BOX 260 CHASKA, MN 55318-0260 N/A Office Residential Medium Density PO BOX 260 CHASKA, MN 55318-0260 1350 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Residential :Ncdium Density PO BOX 260 CHASKA, MN 55318-0260 N/A lOffice Residential Medium Deroitl 500 LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL, MN 55155-4045 N/A Office Industrial Parks & Open Space 500 LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL, MN 55155.4045 N/A Office Parks & Open Space 500 LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL, MN 55155-4045 N/A Office Parks & Open Spac 17506 77TH ST (CHASKA, MN 55318-9600 IN/A (Office Yarks & Open Spaces PO BOX 147 CHANHASSSEN, MN 55317-01 N/A Office Industrial parks & Open Spas 1425 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 1201 BLUFF CREEK DR Agricultural Estate Residential Medium Density 1190 TWIN PEAKS CIR LONGMONT, CO 80503-2170 1161 BLUFF CREEK DR Residential Large Lot Residential Medium Density 1425 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 1201 BLUFF CREEK DR Agricultural Estate Residential Medium Density 1190 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 1190 BLUFF CREEK DR Office Residential Medium Density Acres Gross Notes 7A 122 30.86 Contacted City. Supports change. 8.15 Contacted Ci Supports change. 11.23 Contacted City. Supports change. 7.98 82.2 i 1.18 5.06 0.92 16 wetland 6 acres 1/15/15 called. Likes the large lots, but not opposed 1.09 to long term plamun 5.88 3.33 Net acres 7A 122 30.86 8.15 11.33 0 0 0 5.06 0.92 10 5.88 3.3 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 9 250351710 CHRISTOPHER HAGEN 250351810 SKIP S COOK 256010030 PCH DEVELOPMENT LLC 250351300 SKIP S COOK 250351310 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 256010019 PCH DEVELOPMENT LLC 256010020 PCH DEVELOPMENT LLC 250360500 CHANHASSEN CITY 2503607001 BEATRICE I ZWIERS IRREV TRUST 2503607I0 LONNIE FORD 250361000 STATE OF MINNESOTA-DNR 250361300 J T INVESTMENTS TLC 256362800 MICHAEL S SPIFSS 250363100 ALVIN R LEBENS 257980010 P R KELLY PROPERTIES LLC 250361100 THE WESTERN MOTEL LLC 250363700 LARRY HOPFENSPIRGER 250363000 IAVONNE S DALIMAN Properties in Corridor no land use char 850 FLYING CLOUD DR 15506 VILLAGE WOODS DR 10500 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 15506 VILLAGE WOODS DR 500 LAFAYETTE RD 10500 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 10500 GREAT PLAINS BLVD PO BOX 147 11111 DEUCE RD 450 FLYING CLOUD DR 500 LAFAYETTE RD 8020 BEAVER HILLS IN 470 FLYING CLOUD DR 460 FLYING CLOUD DR 550 FLYING CLOUD DR 15506 VI LAGE WOODS DR 2720 QUAKER IN N 215 FLYING CLOUD DR ed proposed: CHASKA, MN 55318-9503 850 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-1 10551 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA, MN 55318-9470 10500 GREAT PLAINS BLVD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-1 780 FLYING CLOUD DR ST PAUL, MN 55t55-4045 N/A CHASKA, MN 55318-9470 10500 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA, MN 55318-9470 10520 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-01 N/A EI1CO3 MN 55020-9591 220 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 450 FLYING CLOUD DR ST PAUL, MN 55155.4030 N/A. CEDAR FALLS, IA 50613-93 608 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 470 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 460 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9502 550 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-1 575 FLYING CLOUD DR PLYMOUTH, MN 55441-3285 615 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318 215 FLYING CLOUD DR Office _ Office __ Office lndustn Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Industrial Mix Mix iMixed axed axed esidential High Density Residential High Densitv Residential High Density Residential High Density Residential High Density _ Residential High Density Residential High Density _ Ltial gh Density Space 8.12 2.88 0.07 2.14 0.57 2.88 9.99 2.35 5.29 34.68 total ac., bluff and creek 12 buildable 0.911 0.24 1.99 0.6 0.61 Met with property owner on 1/16/15 to discuss the amendment They were mostly concerned that they be able to continue their business. Advised them that they could continue provided they follow the 4.87 conditions of CUP #86-01. 1.88 0.53 5.21 243.63 8 2.88 0.07 2.14 0.57 2.88 9.99 2.35 529 0.91 0 L" 0.6 0.61 4.87 1.88 0.53 3 133.77 NA 250351200 RSS GOLF, LLC 825 Flying Cloud Drive Chaska, MN 55318 825 Flying Cloud Dr 2100 STOUGHTON AVE 1875 FLYING CLOUD DR 1900 STOUGHTON AVE 1805 STOUGHTON AVE 100 FLYING CLOUD DR High Office Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Industrial Density Office Office Industrial _ _ Office Industrial _ Office Industrial Office Industrial High Density 98.00 21.22 9.47 6.82 0.31 35.88 MN River Flood Plain 6 acres upland 6.00 NA 250030700 STOUGHTON AVENUE VENTURES LLC 102 JONATHAN BLVD N STE 200 CHASKA, MN 55318-2383 Gedney Pickers 10 acres redevelopment 10 NA 250340110 GARY W DUNGEY 1539 INDEPENDENCE AVE CHASKA, MN 55318-1665 9A7 NA 250340120 TWIN CITIES SELF STORAGE, CHAS 607 WASHINGTON AVE S STE 503 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415-11 possible redevelopment site 6.82 NA 250340300 CARLTON 1 SOLBERG 1805 STOUGHTON AVE CHASKA, MN 55318-2215 0.31 NA 250360200 BEATRICE I ZWIERS 11111 DEUCE RD ELKO, MN 550204001 Bluff only 14 acres buildable 14 NA 250362700 615 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, LLC 2025 Nicolet Avenue #203 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55404-23 615 Flying Cloud Drive Agricultural Agricultural 3.08 3.08 NA 250362900 DAN & VALERIE TESTER 230 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9532 230 FLYING CLOUD DR Hi Ilensi Hi Densi 0.44 0.44 NA 250363200 SRIKONFORT MN LLC 15582 LILAC DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347 250 FLYING CLOUD DR Hi Densi Hi Dees' 0.75 0.75 NA 250363300 STL'VEN JON & ANGELA s SMITH 240 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9532 240 FLYING CLOUD DR High Density High Density 0.66 0.66 176.63 51.53 G:\PLAN\61 Corridor Study\amendment parceis.xfs Figure S Existing am Residential Low Density Low Density Medium Der Medium Der High Density High Densi Mixed Use F Mixed Use F CII Land Us Commercial Commercial Industrial (d Industrial (vi Office (deve Office (vaw Mixed Use F Mixed Use F Extractive PubliclSem Institutional Parks and F Open Spact Roadway Ri utility Railroad Airport Rural Resid Rural Resid Rural Resid Agricultural Agriculture UndeveloP Wetlands (v Open Wate G:\PLAN\2008 Comp Plan\Amendments\Land Use Map\CSAH 61\Land Use 5 year revised CSAH 61.x1s August 2. 2005 Figure 2-2 2008 - 2030 Land Use Com arison 2020 2030 Land Use Plan Land Use Plan Change 2020-2030 Land Use Acres Percent Acres Percent Acres Commercial 142 1.2% 328 2.2% 186 Office/Industrial 694 5.7% 843 5.7% 149 Office 114 0.9% 277 1.9% 163 Parks & Open Space 1,297 10.6%1 1,401 9.5% 104 Public/Semi-Public 1,204 9.9%1 1,210 8.2% 6 Residential Large Lot 870 7.1%j 948 6.4% 78 Residential Low Density 3,295 27.0%1 4,692 31.8% 1,397 Residential Medium Density 219 1.8% 496 3.40/6 277 Residential High Density 120 1.0% 240 1.6% 120 Mixed Use 51 0.4% 144 1.0% 93 Undevelopable 4,200 34.4% 4,181 28.3% 19 TOTAL 12,206 14,760 2,554 Undevelopable Lakes, Floodplain, Rivers, Streams 2,037 Road Right -of -Way 1,237 Agriculture 882 TOTAL 4,156 G 1PlAM Gump Plan Mm Md "W Use Me Z1 H 61Ve use mmperispn M-20X xis 1122/2015 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on January 9, 2015, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of County Road 61 Corridor Land Use Map Amendment dated January 9, 2015 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 2015. O Notary Pub •c / v ��— - �� Irdt, s Clerk KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public•MinneSota A1y Conmrim Em,i Ln 31, 0 0 January 9, 2015 CITY OF CgA NSEN 7700 Market Boulevard «Taxpayer Name» «Taxpayer_ Address» PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — «Taxpayer CityStateZipo Re: 2030 Comprehensive Plan — Land Use Map Amendment Administration ProAddress: «Property Address» Phone:952.227.1100 p Fax:952.227.1110 PID: «PIDu Building Inspections Dear «Taxpayer Namew Phone:952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 In 2014, the City of Chanhassen undertook a County Road 61 Corridor Plan Study. The City of Chanhassen initiated the County Road 61 Corridor Plan to investigate Engineering future land use transitions for the study area to arrive upon recommendations Phone:952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 consistent with the gateway's importance. This study provides a framework plan that will guide future public and private sector decision -making, shaping this important Finance city gateway. The study can be reviewed on the city's website at Phone:952.227.1140 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/6lcorridor. Fax: 952.227.1110 City staff has been directed to initiate the public hearing process to implement the Park & Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 land use recommendations contained within the County Road 61 Corridor Plan. Your Fax: 952.227.1110 property is recommended to amend the land use from «Existing Land Use» to «Proposed Land Use». Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard A public hearing is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on February 3, 2015 in the Chanhassen Phone: 952.227.1400 City Council Chamber in the lower level of City Hall at 7700 Market Boulevard. The Fax:952.227.1404 staff report for this hearing, when completed, can be viewed on the city's website at Planning & www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/PCAgendas. You are encouraged to attend this meeting. Natural Resources The amendments are then scheduled for review by the City Council on February 23, Phone:95z227.1130 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in the Chanhassen City Council Chamber. Fax: 952.227.1110 If you have any questions, would like additional information or would like to meet to Public works discuss this, please contact me at (952) 227-1139 or kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 79Park Place Phone: 952.2271300 e: or Bob Generous, Senior Planner, at (952) 227-1131 or Fax:952.227.1310 b enerous ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Senior Center Sincerely, Phone:952.227.1125 Kate Aanenson, AICP Fax: 952227.1110 Community Development Director Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 250340100 250340200 250340400 GARY W DUNGEY EDWARD A KOCOUREK HIGH TERRACE LLC 1539 INDEPENDENCE AVE 3804 22ND AVE S PO BOX 260 CHASKA, MN 55318-1665 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407-3006 CHASKA, MN 55318-0260 250350100 250350110 250340420 HIGH TERRACE LLC HIGH TERRACE LLC STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR PO BOX 260 PO BOX 260 500 LAFAYETTE RD CHASKA, MN 55318-0260 CHASKA, MN 55318-0260 ST PAUL, MN 55155-4045 250350111 250350112 250351000 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR LOUISE E ZAMJAHN ETAL 500 LAFAYETTE RD 500 LAFAYETTE RD 7506 77TH ST ST PAUL, MN 55155-4045 ST PAUL, MN 55155-4045 CHASKA, MN 55318-9600 250351100 250350500 250350800 CHANHASSEN CITY HAROLD F HESSE JAMES ROBERT SKAGGS PO BOX 147 1425 BLUFF CREEK DR 1190 TWIN PEAKS CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0147 CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 LONGMONT, CO 80503-2170 250350500 250350700 250351300 HAROLD F HESSE BRIAN J JOHNSON SKIP S COOK 1425 BLUFF CREEK DR 1190 BLUFF CREEK DR 15506 VILLAGE WOODS DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-1439 250351710 250351810 256010010 CHRISTOPHER HAGEN SKIP S COOK PCH DEVELOPMENT LLC 850 FLYING CLOUD DR 15506 VILLAGE WOODS DR 10500 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA, MN 55318-9503 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-1439 CHASKA, MN 55318-9470 256010020 250360500 250360700 PCH DEVELOPMENT LLC CHANHASSEN CITY BEATRICE I ZWIERS IRREV TRUST 10500 GREAT PLAINS BLVD PO BOX 147 11111 DEUCE RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9470 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0147 ELKO, MN 55020-9591 250360710 250361000 250361300 LONNIE FORD STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR J T INVESTMENTS LLC 450 FLYING CLOUD DR 500 LAFAYETTE RD 8020 BEAVER HILLS LN CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 ST PAUL, MN 55155-4030 CEDAR FALLS, IA 50613-9392 250362800 250363100 257980010 MICHAEL S SPIESS ALVIN R LEBENS P R KELLY PROPERTIES LLC 470 FLYING CLOUD DR 460 FLYING CLOUD DR 550 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 CHASKA, MN 55318-9502 250361100 250363700 250363000 THE WESTERN MOTEL LLC LARRY HOPFENSPIRGER Lavonne S Dallman 15506 VILLAGE WOODS DR 2720 QUAKER LN N P 0 Box 285 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-1439 PLYMOUTH, MN 55441-3285 Shakopee, MN 55379 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on January 23, 2015, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for CSAH 61 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendments — Planning Case 2015- 06 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. 4C K n J. E ge hardt, fAputy Clerk Subscrib d and sworn to before me thisday of� , 2015. 1#K:IM T. MEU.200 WJW�ISSEN Notary P�IIc Minnesota Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later In the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for Amendments to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 2 — Land Use Land Use Map and Figures 2-1 and 2-2 Applicant: City of Chanhassen Property CSAH 61 Corridor Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-06. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at bgenerous(fti.chanhassen.mmus or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feel of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may lake several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the nelghborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included In the report to the City Council. 0 you wish to have something to be Included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later In the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Amendments to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Proposal: Chapter 2 — Land Use Land Use Map and Figures 2-1 and 2-2 Applicant: City of Chanhassen Property CSAH 61 Corridor Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-06. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at bcenerous(oci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party Is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing. the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be Included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. 10321 HEIDI LANE LLC 615 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE LLC 9851 PIONEER CIRCLE LLC 8722 BIG WOODS LN 2025 NICOLLET AVE #203 8890 WILD DUNES DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-5345 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55404-2552 SARASOTA, FL 34241-9647 ALBERT & KAREN M DORWEILER ALBERT & SARAH J AVEDIKIAN ALERUS FINANCIAL NA 1565 BLUFF CREEK DR 10220 MANDAN CIR 401 DEMERS ST CHASKA, MN 55318-9519 CHASKA, MN 55318-9401 GRAND FORKS, ND 58201-4574 ALLEN R ROTHE ALVIN R LEBENS AMANDA ALBERS 750 VOGELSBERG TRL 460 FLYING CLOUD DR 1910 STOUGHTON AVE CHASKA, MN 55318-9461 CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 CHASKA, MN 55318-2218 ANDREA S CARTY ANDREW J KNIGHTON ANN K LONSTEIN REVOCABLE 675 LAKOTA LN 575 LAKOTA LN TRUST DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9455 CHASKA, MN 55318-9455 9861 CHANHASSEN, M 55 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8550 ANTHONY & TINA SWANSON ANTHONY L & JILL M URDAHL ARTHUR B & MARY ANN JOHNSON 10260 MANDAN CIR 10148 TRAILS END RD 10676 JACKSON DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9401 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4593 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-4425 BEATRICE I ZWIERS BEATRICE I ZWIERS IRREV TRUST BLUFF CREEK GOLF ASSOC 11111 DEUCE RD 11111 DEUCE RD PO BOX 1060 ELKO, MN 55020-8001 ELKO, MN 55020-9591 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-1060 BOYD S & LAURIE J PETERSON BOYD S PETERSON BRADLEY & REBECCA CHRIST 9860 PIONEER CIR 9860 PIONEER CIR HRISTENSEN DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8696 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8696 9820 CHANHASSEN, M 55 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8549 BRADLEY BONNER BRADLEY S & HEIDI R MOE BRIAN A BLACKWOOD 1003 PINCHERRY LN 1425 BLUFF CREEK DR 10060 TRAILS END RD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-1173 CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 BRIAN J JOHNSON BRUCE W PAUL CARLTON J SOLBERG 1190 BLUFF CREEK DR 10240 MANDAN CIR 1805 STOUGHTON AVE CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 CHASKA, MN 55318-9401 CHASKA, MN 55318-2215 CATHERINE L MEYERS CHAD R & KELLY R KERLIN CHRISTOPHER & ERIN WETMORE 9841 DEERBROOK DR 9848 TRAILS END RD 10072 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8550 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4591 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 CHRISTOPHER & MICHELE A J FAZI CHRISTOPHER HAGEN CONRAD L KERBER 10012 TRAILS END RD 850 FLYING CLOUD DR 9850 DELPHINIUM LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 CHASKA, MN 55318-9503 CHASKA, MN 55318-1176 CRYSTAL H BUCKINGHAM CURTIS W & CAROL J BARDAL DAN & VALERIE TESTER 1791 STOUGHTON AVE 10301 HEIDI LN 230 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-2213 CHASKA, MN 55318-9516 CHASKA, MN 55318-9532 DANIEL J & KATHERINE L SMITH DANIEL J HANSON DANIEL SCHAITBERGER 1020 HESSE FARM RD 1450 WEST FARM RD 10241 MANDAN CIR CHASKA, MN 55318-9520 CHASKA, MN 55318-9517 CHASKA, MN 55318-9402 DANIEL W ABERCROMBIE DAVID & MELISSA HUBBARD DAVID CHARLES SWIFT 10096 TRAILS END RD 1301 HESSE FARM RD 10141 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 CHASKA, MN 55318-9536 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4593 DAVID KURTZ DAVID P & JUDY M WALSTAD DEAN ALLEN HAMMOND 225 PIONEER TRL 10071 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 1180 HESSE FARM RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8662 CHASKA, MN 55318-9466 CHASKA, MN 55318-9521 DENNIS L & LINDA M SMITH DEVAL U & DATTA D MEDH DURENE D KLINGELHUTZ 1251 BLUFF CREEK DR 535 LAKOTA LN 1560 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 CHASKA, MN 55318-9456 CHASKA, MN 55318-9519 ED MYSLIVECEK EDWARD A KOCOUREK EDWARD N & DORNIA A TIPTON 10151 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 3804 22ND AVE S 1291 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9469 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407-3006 CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 EMILY ANN ANDERSON ERIC J LOHSE EUGENE W JUNKIER TRUST 10441 BLUFF CIR 1501 W FARM RD 1250 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9534 CHASKA, MN 55318-9528 CHASKA, MN 55318-9522 FRAYNE & DEBORAH JOHNSEN GAIL E BECKER TRUST GAIL STONEMARK 1100 HESSE FARM RD 10291 MANDON CIR 10004 1ST AVE S CHASKA, MN 55318-9521 CHASKA, MN 55318-9402 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55420-4906 GARY & DEBRA ANDERSON GARY L MILLER GARY W DUNGEY 725 CREEKWOOD 10300 MANDAN CIR 1539 INDEPENDENCE AVE CHASKA, MN 55318-9621 CHASKA, MN 55318-9401 CHASKA, MN 55318-1665 GAYE E CARLSON REV TRUST & GAYE LYNN GUYTON GAYLE M & RICHARD P VOGEL TER 10083 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 105 PIONEER TRL 821 CREEKWOOD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9466 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8660 CHASKA, MN 55318-9643 GEORGE C FLETCHER 1181 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9526 GREGORY P GRAZZINI 1251 HESSE FARM CIR CHASKA, MN 55318-9518 HAROLD F HESSE 1425 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 GERALD F & NANCY G SLOCUM 9920 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8551 HALLA FAMILY LP 495 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4718 HARRY E NIEMELA 9700 LAKETOWN RD CHASKA, MN 55318-4513 GERALD R JR & SHELLY D COOK 9920 DELPHINIUM LN CHASKA, MN 55318-1177 HALLA FAMILY LP 6601 MOHAWK TRL EDINA, MN 55439-1029 HELEN C LINK REV TRUST 1216 JEFFERSON ST SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-2084 HENNEPIN CO REG RR AUTHORITY HESSE FARM HOMEOWNERS ASSN HESSE FARM II HOMEOWNERS 300 6TH ST S SW STREET LEVEL 1425 BLUFF CREEK DR ASSN MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487-0999 CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 10421 BLUFF CIR CHASKA, MN 55318-9534 HIGH TERRACE LLC PO BOX 260 CHASKA, MN 55318-0260 JAMES A & BONNIE B SWANSEN 615 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 55318-9455 JAMES D VERDOORN 9203 VICTORIA DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-2767 JAMES M & CHERYL A SULERUD 730 VOGELSBERG TRL CHASKA, MN 55318-9461 HOWARD & MARY NOZISKA 1120 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9521 JAMES A & CARLA J STRUBLE 1405 WEST FARM RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9517 JAMES DALE VERDOORN 9203 VICTORIA DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-2767 JAMES M HAUTMAN 10095 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA, MN 55318-9466 J T INVESTMENTS LLC 608 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9502 JAMES B AKERS 9905 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4592 JAMES DOBCHUK 9972 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-4592 JAMES R SCHAFFRAN 845 CREEKWOOD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9643 JAMES ROBERT SKAGGS JAMES W SABINSKE JAXON D & ALLISON L LANG 1190 TWIN PEAKS CIR 775 CREEKWOOD 9870 DELPHINIUM LN LONGMONT, CO 80503-2170 CHASKA, MN 55318-9621 CHASKA, MN 55318-1176 JEFFREY & KATHLEEN DYPWICK JEFFREY A JONCKOWSKI JEFFREY A PODERGOIS 10300 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 1315 BLUFF CREEK DR 1620 WEST FARM RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9467 CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 CHASKA, MN 55318-9507 JEFFREY J & JUDITH A DAVIDSON JEFFREY M GOOD JENNIFER M PALMQUIST 10017 TRAILS END RD 1231 BLUFF CREEK DR 9961 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8552 JERRY J PISNEY JESS R ELMQUIST JESSIE KOEBNICK 1675 FLYING CLOUD DR 1500 WEST FARM RD 815 CREEKWOOD ST CHASKA, MN 55318-2434 CHASKA, MN 55318-9528 CHASKA, MN 55318-9643 JIANJUN LIU JIMMY M & MARY E ROANE JOE MORRISON 9860 TRAILS END RD 9981 DEERBROOK DR 10053 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4591 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8552 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 JOHN & ANNA MAE MAKELA JOHN & ELAINE Z MALAKOWSKY JOHN & JENNIFER BEUTZ 8503 OLD TOWNE CT 10301 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 9840 DEERBROOK DR KNOXVILLE, TN 37923-6361 CHASKA, MN 55318-9467 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8549 JOHN B & JANE A PAUL JOHN D & BARBARA J FORCE JOHN E TRUSHEIM 9121 SABRE LN 1001 HESSE FARM RD 10341 HEIDI LN WESTMINSTER, CA 92683-5521 CHASKA, MN 55318-9527 CHASKA, MN 55318-9516 JOHN M & LINDA J REVIER JOHN MICHAEL SOBIECK JOHN TROG SR 9881 DEERBROOK DR 250 FLYING CLOUD DR 1545 BLUFF CREEK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8550 CHASKA, MN 55318-9532 CHASKA, MN 55318-9519 JON FRANSWAY JOSEPH MORRISON JOSEPH ROBERT MONNENS 9941 TRAILS END RD 10053 TRAILS END RD 1781 STOUGHTON AVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4592 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 CHASKA, MN 55318-2213 JOSHUA H LINDGREN KEVIN E & JANET S WINTER KEVIN L SMITH 7597 AUGUSTA RD 1075 HESSE FARM RD 10440 BLUFF CIR CHASKA, MN 55318-9347 CHASKA, MN 55318-9527 CHASKA, MN 55318-9534 KEVIN NIELSEN KIMBERLY & RICHARD BLOMBERG KIMI GABOURY TRUST 740 VOGELSBERG TRL RE 1905 STOUGHTON AVE CHASKA, MN 55318-9461 1225 HESSE FARM CIR CHASKA, MN 55318-2217 CHASKA, MN 55318-9518 KIRK A MACKENZIE KURT & HEIDI SCHEPPMANN KYLE R DECKER 10420 BLUFF CIR 40 SETTLERS CT 1915 STOUGHTON AVE CHASKA, MN 55318-9534 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4595 CHASKA, MN 55318-2217 L RICHARD & KAREN C DEE LARRY HOPFENSPIRGER LAVERNE C & EDYTHE B WHEELER 1201 HESSE FARM CIR 2720 QUAKER LN N 445 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 55318-9518 PLYMOUTH, MN 55441-3285 CHASKA, MN 55318-9457 LAVONNE S DALLMAN LENNART J JOHNSON LISA C OLSON PO BOX 285 9929 TRAILS END RD 9855 DELPHINIUM LN SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-0285 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4592 CHASKA, MN 55318-1176 LOIS A RIESGRAF LONNIE FORD LOUISE E ZAMJAHN ETAL 720 VOGELSBERG TRL 450 FLYING CLOUD DR 7506 77TH ST CHASKA, MN 55318-9461 CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 CHASKA, MN 55318-9600 M A GEDNEY COMPANY MARK D & KAY M HALLA MARK D HALLA PO BOX 8 6055 HIGHWAY 212 6055 HIGHWAY 212 E CHASKA, MN 55318-0008 CHASKA, MN 55318-9250 CHASKA, MN 55318-9250 MARK STEVEN CLINE MARTIN K & KATHLEEN M MARY E BRIOL 1650 WEST FARM RD SCHUTROP 10377 HEIDI LN CHASKA, MN 55318-9507 540 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 55318-9516 CHASKA. MN 55318-9453 MARY J TEICH MARYANNE M WHITE MATHEW JOHNSON 645 PROVIDENCE DR 670 CREEKWOOD DR 415 LAKOTA LN SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-4550 CHASKA, MN 55318-1149 CHASKA, MN 55318-9457 MAXWELL F & JULIANE M TISCH MICHAEL A & CHRISTINE M MANNO MICHAEL G & KATHY A ARNOLD 1600 WEST FARM RD 9836 TRAILS END RD 1400 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9507 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4591 CHASKA, MN 55318-9523 MICHAEL G LADD MICHAEL J & PATRICIA A CONROY MICHAEL J BERNASKI 1070 HESSE FARM RD 9921 DEERBROOK DR 10129 TRAILS END RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9520 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8552 CHANHASSEN, MN 553174593 MICHAEL J KANE MICHAEL PARADIS REV TRUST MICHAEL R WALSH 10048 TRAILS END RD 10421 BLUFF CIR 10165 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 CHASKA, MN 55318-9534 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4595 MICHAEL S SPIESS MICHAEL WALSH MINNESOTA VALLEY ELEC CO-OP 470 FLYING CLOUD DR 10153 TRAILS END RD 125 MINNESOTA VALLEY DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4593 JORDAN, MN 55352-9369 NANCY J ROSSBERG REV TRUST 9885 RASPBERRY HL CHASKA, MN 55318-1180 NEIL BANNISTER 9870 PIONEER CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8696 NICHOLAS WARITZ 1271 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA. MN 55318-9515 P R KELLY PROPERTIES LLC 550 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9502 PAULJTAUNTON 9980 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8551 PETER J EISENBARTH 10460 BLUFF CIR CHASKA. MN 55318-9534 PHILIP R & STACEY M BURROUGHS 10036 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 RANDALL S & MELODEE D BROOKS 9984 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4592 NANCY MADSEN REV TRUST 1101 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9526 NICHOLAS & FRANKIE EVANOFF 1401 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9524 NICOLA S SMITH 725 BRAMBLE DR CHASKA, MN 55318-1128 PAUL A & SHERYL A CARLSON 10077 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 PAUL W & SUSAN M ALLEN 1002 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9520 PETERSON-JACQUES FARM LAND CO 15900 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-4047 PHILIPPE O SCHWOB 10112 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-4593 RENEE L STRICKLAND 10251 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA, MN 55318-9468 NATHAN H GRIFFITHS 9821 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8550 NICHOLAS JOHNSON 9941 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8552 NORMAN & KAROLINE L MONROE PO BOX 115 CHASKA, MN 55318-0115 PAUL BEARD 10160 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4593 PCH DEVELOPMENT LLC 10500 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA, MN 55318-9470 PHEASANT CREEK FARMS LLC 1827 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8419 RAIN SNOW OR SHINE GOLF LLC 825 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9503 RICHARD BARBARI 9996 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4592 RICHARD K WERMERSKIRCHEN RICHARD T HALVER RICK & HEATHER EHRMAN 1930 STOUGHTON AVE 10271 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 60 SETTLERS WEST CT CHASKA, MN 55318-2218 CHASKA, MN 55318-9468 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4595 RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK ROBERT A PARKER ROBERT G & JUDY I STEFFES WSD 50 SETTLERS CT 1350 HESSE FARM RD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 MARTIN DRIVE 1500 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 CHASKA, MN 55318-9523 EDEN 44 ROBERT G & SUSAN D BUSCH ROBERT GARY DAUB ROBERT R JR & MARY C FAFINSKI 9989 TRAILS END RD 9953 TRAILS END RD 1520 WEST FARM RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4592 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4592 CHASKA, MN 65318-9528 RODNEY G & DIANE S BEUCH RODNEY L RIEHL ROGER & VIKKI BROUN 1180 PIONEER TRL 1221 BLUFF CREEK DR 1200 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 55318-1122 CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 CHASKA, MN 55318-9522 ROHAN LUND INC RONALD R SYMANITZ RUSSELL & YVONNE BARTO 925 CREEKWOOD ST 13560 SKYLINE CIR 400 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 55318-9645 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379-8708 CHASKA, MN 55318-9452 RUSSELL J & YVONNE L BARTO TRU RYAN & COURTNEY DUNLAY RYAN NIEDFELDT 400 LAKOTA LN 9901 DEERBROOK DR 1925 STOUGHTON AVE CHASKA, MN 55318-9452 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8552 CHASKA, MN 55318-2217 RYAN T & HEATHER C HOYTINK LIV SCOTT ANSETH SCOTT FRIES 9948 TRAILS END RD 10084 TRAILS END RD 16393 MAYFIELD DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4592 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-2212 SCOTT T & ANN S LANG SETTLERS WEST LP SKIP S COOK 9924 TRAILS END RD 10096 TRAILS END RD 15506 VILLAGE WOODS DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4592 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-1439 SPENCER L & GLORIA A BOYNTON STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 777 CREEKWOOD 500 LAFAYETTE RD 500 LAFAYETTE RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9621 ST PAUL, MN 55155-4045 ST PAUL, MN 55155-4030 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT STEPHEN M & NICOLE DRAGOS STEPHEN MICHAEL FUSSELMAN 1500 W COUNTY ROAD B2 9960 DEERBROOK DR 10361 HEIDI LN ROSEVILLE, MN 55113-3174 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8551 CHASKA, MN 55318-9516 STEVE LEIVERMANN STEVEN D & MARY E DODGE STEVEN J CLINTON 10005 TRAILS END RD 9965 TRAILS END RD 9900 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 CHANHASSEN, MN 553174592 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8551 STEVEN JON & ANGELA S SMITH STEVEN R PASCHKE STOUGHTON AVENUE VENTURES 240 FLYING CLOUD DR 9977 TRAILS END RD LLC CHASKA, MN 55318-9532 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4592 102 JONATHAN BLVD N STE 200 CHASKA, MN 55318-2383 SUSAN V RECH 1000 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9520 THOMAS DIXON 9853 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4591 TIMOTHY A & TERESA M VOEHL 694 W DESERT BROOM DR CHANDLER, AZ 85248-3844 TODD & MARY BETH SMITS 9917 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4592 U S FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE 5600 AMERICAN BLVD W STE 990 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55437-1458 WALTER & MARTHA MOROZ 495 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 55318-9457 WILLIAM & ELIZABETH PETA 10065 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4594 WILLIAM H & LISA J KIRKPATRICK 10380 HEIDI LN CHASKA, MN 55318-9516 WILLIAM JOSEPH MCNEELY 9940 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8551 THE WESTERN MOTEL LLC 15506 VILLAGE WOODS DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-1439 THOMAS J & KATHLEEN R GERTZ 10001 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA, MN 55318-9466 TIMOTHY M & VICTORIA A WISE 425 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 55318-9457 TODD M NICKELL 9872 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-4591 VALEED A SHAIKH 30 SETTLERS CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4595 WALTER E MANEY 10024 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174594 WILLIAM C GRIFFITH 185 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8660 WILLIAM H MEYER 1680 WEST FARM RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9507 XIANGDONG LIN 9960 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4592 THOMAS A NIEBELING 10360 HEIDI LN CHASKA, MN 55318-9516 THOMAS L & SANDRA K CARAVELLI 6423 MERE DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346-2311 TIMOTHY P & JAMI L BUSBY 595 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 55318-9456 TWIN CITIES SELF STORAGE, CHAS 607 WASHINGTON AVE S STE 503 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415-1162 VIVEK KAUL 9875 DELPHINIUM LN CHASKA, MN 55318-1176 WAYNE A & INGRID A DICASTRI 1025 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 55318-9527 WILLIAM F HOLMES 9912 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4592 WILLIAM J ROUSE 9936 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-4592 Generous, Bob From: shakcars@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:32 AM To: Generous, Bob Subject: Public hearing/ Land use changes Hello Bob, I am glad I attended the hearing. You and Kate did a great job with the presentations and answering the question. Sound like a great proposal, I think the lower part of property at 608 Flying Cloud dr. (closer to the road) would be better to stay commercial. The north half could be merged with a neighbor property to be used as residential. Again, thanks for the good job you guys are doing. Danny Chuka. 608 Flying Cloud dr. Public Health nd a Water Mar ger Division Plannclg and Wager ManagenserR Dept TM Goerrr tCenter MmniYatim&d6q 600 Effi 41 stsaet Chaska, Minnesota 55318 �.ARVE.♦Z Nh : 195213611820 C'UtN'1l vn—co.carver.nm.us February4, 2015 Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Review Comments for the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dear Kate, Carver County supports the City of Chanhassen's efforts to plan for land use along the CSAH 61 corridor that aligns with ongoing and future improvements to the road systems in the area including the ongoing Southwest Reconnection Project. In addition to the development opportunities of this corridor the County recognizes the important, and sensitive, natural and recreational resources present in the area, particularly the Seminary Fen, Minnesota River, and the Minnesota River Bluffs Regional Trail. To this end, Carver County submits the following comments supporting the City of Chanhassen's future development of the corridor in a way that maximizes the area's value while preserving its most unique features. • The stormwater requirements associated with developing medium density residential adjacent to the Seminary Fen SNA may present challenges, specifically areas 1 and 3 identified on the map titled, "County Road 61 Corridor Study Current and Proposed 2030 Landuse." The small size of both areas, particularly area 3, could present challenges and limitations to the achievable density. • The parcel located on the west third of area 3 is owned by the Hennepin County Railroad Authority, and is a part of the MN River Bluffs Regional Trail. Per regional policy, this parcel is unlikely to change from its current use. • The Carver County 2030 Comprehensive Plan encourages connections to regional and County trail networks as development occurs. Land use changes may increase the need for trail access. Accordingly, connections to the MN River Bluffs Regional Trail should be explored when appropriate. • Carver County plans to conduct a corridor study on CSAH 61 in 2015. Chanhassen's land use plans for this area will inform future roadway requirements to be identified in that study. Thank you for considering Carver County's comments. You are welcome to contact me for further clarification. Sincerely, -✓G� %t✓a'i— Paul Moline, AICP Carver County Planning & Water Management April 20, 2015 Ms. Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: City of Chanhassen, CSAH 61 Corridor Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Complete for Review Metropolitan Council Review File No. 20265-S Metropolitan Council District 4 Dear Ms. Aanenson: The Metropolitan Council received the City's CSAH 61 Corridor comprehensive plan amendment on March 12, 2015, and received supplemental information on the proposed amendment on March 30, 2015. The amendment reguides approximately 288 acres from office and office industrial land uses to residential medium and high density. and mixed land uses located along the CSAH 61 corridor as a key southern gateway to the City. The purpose of the amendment is to incorporate the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study into the comprehensive plan. Council staff finds the proposed plan amendment complete for review. Under Metropolitan Council comprehensive plan amendment review procedures, outlined in the Local Planning Handbook, the Council has 60 days to complete its formal review of the plan amendment. The 60-day period ends on May 29, 2015. Review of the CPA is scheduled as follows: 1. Community Development Committee on Monday, May 11, 2015, 4:00 p.m. 2. Metropolitan Council on Wednesday, May 27, 2015. Staff will notify you of any changes to the review schedule and forward a copy of the staff report for review when it is mailed to the Council's Community Development Committee. If you have any questions, please call Angela R. Torres, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1566. Sincerely, LisaBeth Barajas, Manager Local Planning Assistance CC: Crystal Sheppeck, Minnesota Housing Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT Metro Deb Barber, Metropolitan Council District 4 Angela R. Torres, Sector Representative/Principal Reviewer Raya Esmaeili, Reviews Coordinator 461-60doys. North1 :1 "' 651.291.0904 1 metrocouncil.org METROPOLITAN C 0 U N C I L Dr. Dennis Peterson - Minnetonka School District 276 December 12, 2014 Page 2 City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use Map Amendments I'mI acknowledge receipt of the above cited comprehensive plan update notification waive further review comment on the amendment. Izo/s Signature Date _ Derv►, s C . � ��t.sorl 5,,� Printed Name Title RETURN THIS PAGE RECEIVED APR 2 7 2015 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 5!7/2015 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Print Agenda Monday I May 11, 2015 Metropolitan Council Chambers 1 4:50 PM AGENDA CALL TO ORDER APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES May 4 2015 of the regular meeting of the Community Development Committee IV. BUSINESS A. Consent 1 2015-99 Theodore Wirth Regional Park Master Plan and Grant Request, Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (Jan Youngquist 651 602-1029) 2 2015-100 Park Acquisition Opportunity Fund Grant for St. Croix Valley Regional Trail, Carpenter Nature Center Easement, Washington County (Toni Dupre 651 602-1621) 3 2015-101 City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No. 20265-8 (Angela Torres 651 602-1566) 4 2015-102 City of Prior Lake Gateway Redevelopment Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review No. 19494-9 (Angela Torres 651 602-1566) V. INFORMATION none VI. ADJOURNMENT SW Action taken by Committee and Council the same week Additional materials included for items on published agenda Additional business item added following publication of agenda Backup materials available at the meeting Business Item No. 2015-101 Community Development Committee Meeting date: May 11, 2015 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of May 27, 2015 Subject: City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Review File No. 20265- 8 District(s), Member(s): District 4, Deb Barber Policy/Legal Reference: Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minn. Stat. § 473.176) Staff Prepared/Presented: Angela R. Torres, AICP, Senior Planner, Local Planning Assistance (651-602- 1566) Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council: 1. Adopt the attached review record and allow the City of Chanhassen to place the CSAH 61 Corridor comprehensive plan amendment (CPA) into effect. 2. Find that the CPA does not change the City's forecasts. Background The Council reviewed the City's Comprehensive Plan Update (Business Item 2008-206, Review File No. 20265-1) on October 22, 2008. This is the City's eighth CPA since the review of the Update. The CPA proposes to amend the local comprehensive plan to reguide approximately 288 acres from office and office industrial land uses to residential medium density. high density, and mixed use land uses. The property is located along the CSAH 61 corridor as a key southern gateway to the City. The purpose of the amendment is to incorporate the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study results into the comprehensive plan. Rationale The proposed CPA conforms to regional system plans, is consistent with Council policies, and is compatible with the plans of other local communities and school districts. Funding None. Known Support / Opposition None known. Page - 1 MEoTROPOLcITAN Review Record City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review File No. 20265-8, Council Business Item No. 2015-102 BACKGROUND The City of Chanhassen (City) is located in eastern Carver County, surrounded by the cities of Eden Prairie and Shorewood (Hennepin County), Chaska and Victoria (Carver County), and Shakopee and Jackson Township (Scott County). Consistent with the policies adopted by the Council in June 2014 (Business Item 2014-143) regarding review of local comprehensive plans, this amendment is being reviewed under the 2030 Regional Development Framework (RDF) and its policy plans. The 2030 Regional Development Framework (RDF) identifies the City as a Developing community. The Metropolitan Council (Council) forecasts that the City will grow between 2010 and 2030 from 27,500 to 38,000 people, from 10,200 to 14,800 households, and that employment will grow from 13,000 to 15,600 jobs. The Council reviewed the City's Update, Review File No. 20265-1, on October 27, 2008. The City has submitted six comprehensive plan amendments (CPAs). Three of those amendments made minor land use changes, one amendment made minor text and map changes to the transportation section, and one amendment identified approved road reclassifications. These CPAs met the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Administrative Guidelines revised by the Council on July 28, 2010, and have been allowed to be placed into effect under those guidelines. The City also submitted a CPA to adopt the Chanhassen Apartments CPA to reguide land in support of a 155-unit apartment development (Review File No. 20265-5). The Council reviewed the amendment on July 15, 2013, and the amendment was allowed to be put into effect. This is the City's seventh proposed amendment to their 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update. REQUEST SUMMARY The CPA proposes to amend the local comprehensive plan to reguide approximately 288 acres from office and office industrial land uses to residential medium density, high density, and mixed use land uses located along the CSAH 61 corridor as a key southern gateway to the City. The purpose of the amendment is to incorporate the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study into the comprehensive plan. OVERVIEW Conformance with The CPA conforms to the Regional System Plans for Parks, Transportation Regional Systems (including Aviation), and Wastewater, with no substantial impact on, or departure from, these plans. Consistency with The CPA is consistent with the Council's RDF, with water resources Council Policies management, and is consistent with Council forecasts. Page-2 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Compatibility with Plans The CPA will not have an impact on adjacent communities, school districts, of Adjacent or watershed districts, and is compatible with the plans of those districts. Jurisdictions PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTIONS • The Council acted on the City's Update on October 27, 2008 (Review File No. 20265-1). • West One CPA was administratively approved by the Council on November 9, 2009 (Review File No. 20265-2). • Land Use and Transportation CPA was administratively approved by the Council on February 14, 2011 (Review File No. 20265-3). • Road Reclassification CPA was administratively approved by the Council on May 3, 2013 (Review File No. 20265-4). • The Chanhassen Apartments CPA was approved by the Council on July 24, 2013 (Review File 20265-5). • The Preserve at Rice Lake CPA was administratively approved by the Council on September 12, 2013 (Review File No. 20265-6). • Arbor Cove CPA was administratively approved by the Council on May 20, 2014 (Review File No. 20265-7). ISSUES I. Does the amendment conform to the regional system plans? II. Is the amendment consistent with the RDF and other Council policies? III. Does the amendment change the City's forecasts? IV. Is the amendment compatible with the plans of adjacent local governmental units and affected jurisdictions? ISSUES ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Conformance with Regional Systems The CPA conforms to the regional system plan for Regional Parks, Transportation, and Wastewater, with no substantial impact on, or departure from, these system plans. Consistency with Council Policy The CPA is consistent with Council policies for forecasts, land use, housing, sub -surface sewage treatment systems, and water supply. Additional review comments regarding consistency with land use and housing policies are detailed below. Land Use Reviewer: Angela R. Torres (651-602-1566) The 2030 Regional Development Framework identifies the City as a Developing community, and directs Developing communities to support sewered residential development at densities of at least 3 units per acre. The CPA proposes to reguide approximately 288 acres from office and office industrial land uses to residential medium density, high density, and mixed use land uses located along the CSAH 61 corridor as a key southern gateway to the City. The purpose of the amendment is to incorporate the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study into the comprehensive plan. The land use changes Page - 3 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL allow for the potential future redevelopment of the corridor. As shown in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 3, the City is reguiding a number of different properties. Table 1: Detailed Land Use Changes along CSAH 61 20265-8 CSAH 61 Corridor CPA Acres Guiding Change 58.96 Office to Residential Medium Density 107.34 Office to Parks 17.09 Residential Large Lot to Residential Medium Density 9.21 Office to Residential Medium Density 11.07 Office to Mixed (70%Res/30%Comm) 15.58 Office Industrial to Mixed (70%Res/30%Comm) 16.86 Office Industrial to Residential High Density 7.62 Office Industrial to Parks The City's Update, with previous amendments, has a planned minimum residential density of 3.73 units per acre. Consistent with the Council's MUSA Implementation Guidelines, communities participating in the Plat Monitoring Program (PMP) receive credit for development platted beginning in the year 2000. Since 2000, the City has approved residential developments with an overall average density of 4.7 units per acre. The City has a combined overall density of 4.3 units per acre, consistent with the Council's policy for sewered residential development in Developing communities. Table 2. Residential Density Calculation for Planned Residential Land Uses Category Density Range Min Max Acres Min Max Units Units Low Density Residential 1.2 4 171.61 206 686 Medium Density Residential 4 8 148.49 594 1188 High Density Residential 8 16 65.9 527 1055 Mixed Use 1 8 20 26.65 1 213 533 Overall Density 3.73 8.39 Plat Monitoring Totals 2013 570.1 2682 4.70 CPU and Plat Monitoring Total 982.8 4222 4.30 Housing Reviewer: Angela R. Torres (651-602-1566) The CPA is consistent with the Council's policy for housing. The City's share of the region's affordable housing need is 1,166 units. With this amendment, the City has over 493 acres available guided at densities high enough to support this need. This amendment adds 129 new acres to land guided to support their affordable housing allocation. Compatibility with Plans of Adjacent Govemmental Units and Plans of Affected Special Districts and School Districts The proposed CPA is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions. No compatibility issues with plans of adjacent governmental units and plans of affected special districts and school districts were identified. Page - 4 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ATTACHMENTS Figure 1: Location Map Showing Regional Planning Areas Figure 2: Location Map showing Regional Systems Figure 3: Current and Proposed Land Use Guiding Page-5 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Figure 1: Location Map Showing Regional Planning Areas La ketown Twp. Dahlgren A, o:duiv unn., Shorewood £ , , r 00 Chanhassen I 41',.r unry Road 61 Corridor i ArnendmentArea � - wa �, s Chaska Minnetonka `EKG Eden Prairie V � J.5: p2�• i <� r� ackson Shakopee Twp. r � y" •,.ny �; rn Hrr*N e\•:: lei �0 00 03 1 1.5 J )5 vies 2030 Framework Planning Areas Developed Developing Rural Center Rural Growth Center Diversified Rural Rural Residential _ Agricultural Non Region Ncompass Street Centedines Page - 6 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Figure 2: Location Map Showing Regional Systems Y�toria ♦ ; Wet e` ivy, x`GH E' :ic-,y� � J E Dq n - F Chanhassen £ )U ftruaN lxw a z R b � i Eden ' Prairie tasks •- - : County Road 61 r Corridor Amendment Area x QU Shakopee a n\2E � C vat filulM1 � 00 ¢ _ Jac son j TWPP. 4 0.5 1 1.5 t 1.5 J e0 Mlv+ Regional Systems Wastewater Services Recreation Open Space B Mew. Pan Reuse 1 Staters Regonal Pan MCES htemspters Speaal Recreation Feature ■ MCES Twatme,t Plants Regional Trails Ezntinp Transportation 011001 Inbrstabs — US RgM1 ,,s N.".1s Strout CentcrNncs — Some Mgtiways — County Roads Page - 7 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Figure 3: Current and Proposed Land Use Guiding Page - 8 1 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL April 20, 2015 Ms. Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: City of Chanhassen, CSAH 61 Corridor Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Complete for Review Metropolitan Council Review File No. 20265-8 Metropolitan Council District 4 Dear Ms. Aanenson: The Metropolitan Council received the City's CSAH 61 Corridor comprehensive plan amendment on March 12, 2015, and received supplemental information on the proposed amendment on March 30, 2015. The amendment reguides approximately 288 acres from office and office industrial land uses to residential medium and high density and mixed land uses located along the CSAH 61 corridor as a key southern gateway to the City. The purpose of the amendment is to incorporate the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study into the comprehensive plan. Council staff finds the proposed plan amendment complete for review. Under Metropolitan Council comprehensive plan amendment review procedures, outlined in the Local Planning Handbook, the Council has 60 days to complete its formal review of the plan amendment. The 60-day period ends on May 29, 2015. Review of the CPA is scheduled as follows: 1. Community Development Committee on Monday, May 11, 2015, 4:00 p.m. 2. Metropolitan Council on Wednesday, May 27, 2015. Staff will notify you of any changes to the review schedule and forward a copy of the staff report for review when it is mailed to the Council's Community Development Committee. If you have any questions, please call Angela R. Torres, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1566. Sincerely, LisaBeth Barajas, Manager Local Planning Assistance CC: Crystal Sheppeck, Minnesota Housing Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT Metro Deb Barber, Metropolitan Council District 4 Angela R. Torres, Sector Representative/Principal Reviewer Raya Esmaeili, Reviews Coordinator 61-60days. Northitreet 1 :1 "' I F. 651.602.1550 090 1 metrocouncii.org METROPOLITAN C 0 U N C I L CITY OF March 30, 2015 CIIANIMSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PBox Chanhassen, MNN 55317 Ms. LisaBeth B araas l Manager Local Planning Assistance Metropolitan Council Administration 390 Robert Street North PFax:952.227.11100 Fax:952.227.1110 St. Paul MN 55101-1805 Building Inspections Re: City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Phone: 952.227.1180 Metropolitan Council File No. 20265-8 Fax: 952.227,1190 Incomplete Determination Engineering Phone:952.22.2271160 Dear Ms. Barajas: Fax:952.227.1170 I am writing in response to the Metropolitan Council determination of the Finance incompleteness of the submittal and to request the continuation of the review. Phone-952.227.1140 Fax:952227.1110 Required Information: Park &Recreation Phone. 9522271120 The ma amendment of the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority(HCRRA) P eP �' � Fax: 952,227.1110 property was inadvertently included on the map submittal. If you review the staff report discussing the amendments in areas 2 and 3, you will see that the land was not Recreation Center included as part of the analysis for a land use amendment. Nor did we notice the 2310 Coulter Boulevard property owners about such a change. We have revised the map to show these Phone:952.227.1400 properties as currently guided for Residential Large Lot (enclosed). Fax:952.227.1404 Planning & As part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update, the City will look at amending the Natural Resources HCRRA properties from Residential Large Lot to either Parks and Open Space or Phone: 952.227.1130 Public/Semi-public. It should be noted that the existing land use and its consistent Fax: 952.227,1110 zoning would permit parks and open space uses. Public Works Advisory: 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227,1310 The City is not proposing amending the forecasts within the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. As part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update, the City will utilize the new Senior Center land uses in estimating housing, population and employment projections and in Phone: 952.227.1125 developing TAZ data. Fax:952.227.1110 Website As stated above, the City will look at amending the HCRRA properties from www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Residential Large Lot to either Parks and Open Space or Public/Semi-public as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update. SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 0 Ms. LisaBeth Barajas March 30, 2015 Page 2 Thank you for your assistance in this matter. I have previously emailed all this information to reviewcoordinator(i�metc.state.mn.us. If you require additional information, please contact me at (952) 227-1139 or kaanenson(dci.chanhassen.mn.us. Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Enclosure ec: Robert Generous, Senior Planner Todd Gerhardt, City Manager g.�plan\2015 planning cases\2015-06 csah 61 lend use amendment\met council incomplete response ltr.dmx CountyStudy Road 61 Corridor Y= =T= =YY Current 2030 Land Usei �- pvl� o c o v o o e c a v P Rice i o \ c`c c c t°c a oov0000. 000eeve°v: a- o°O°°< v` e`e`p`p`e`o`o c ° a°v°v°e°o°v°°° v`5 c o G G o o e e c p a c c o 0 o v o o c oo°D°o ° o Lake Z 4e4 O p p p° O O O °° O<°°O ° O O O O O O°O OP G D O O C p 4 t o e < e ° ° ° o ° ° o ° ° o e o c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c c o p p p c o 0 0 o v p p v o 0 0 0 o c t v G o v o a e o v v e v c c 4 o c c o< e 4 v v o o e p e e c e e P p p p p p e<< p p p p< p e p p e< �• p p p V C e t D p p p p G p p G p p p p p G G � D p p 4 p D r D p D D p p p p G p p p p p p p p p p p p e < p p p< G a OHW 699.2 o< o o< o 0 0 0 0< o v e e e o 0 0 0 0 0 o v e e v e o o L o o v e o c ' 0 o°°°°i °°° o`o°o°o°O°°°°o°°°°ow °°o°v°p°e°o°e°o° °o I'p°o°o°v v°v a°o �•` °o°o°o°e`t I c c c 4 o v o o v e v o e v .. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0{ e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o e o 0 o Q o o e c o 0 0 o e o 0 o e s e o e o 0 0 o p o o G o o v p v p o 0 0 0 0°�0 [ c< v e c 4 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v v a o e c e o< a v f e c o v o o v v o 0 0 0 < c c o 0 0 0 e o 0 o v e o o v o 0 o e o e e e e e e c a c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`0°'o D G r G D c D G v p o 0 o e c a r p< p< p< e e P p p p< p o o e o 0 0 p p p p p. p< p V p e p p e e p. p p e e e pLegend o v o c°o 0 0 o c Goo e o 0 0 0 0 0•0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e p e p o c o a v p e c o c c v v o o e e p o 0 0 0 4 v o 0 0 0 0 0 o v p C4, ti c 4 O c e 0 C 0 0 o O C o O e 0 p o v o e p 0 O p v p c a' C D e c o O D O c p oCc p o< O D o O o O v O D e e v c e e a P C v°eo o c 4 v O p O F 0 0 0° O 4 D D p O O v O O°° • j COMMERICAL �1 0 ovoc ve eo v o 00 o r o 0 0 0 0 o e v o 0 o e o o e o 0 o p o o v e v v o v v v e v v a v c o v o e p o 0 0 o v o c c c o o G o o p p p v c _- iJ < o 0 0 o v P v v e o 0 0 0 0 0 0< e o 0 0 0< o 0 0 o v o o e e e v v v e v e v e v o v e p o e v e a P v a a e < t t c e o< o 0 0 0< o o< C � o c 9 o v e o c p c o o c c o 0 0 o c o o G o 0 o e o o p o 0 o p o c v P e o p o o v 4 e� e e e o 0 0 o v v e e e o 0 0 o c p e c c o v o 0 0 0 o v D v o e p c o o e o 0 0 0 o e v 4 o e e 4 c a wi e e v o p e p a c e p c o c o 0 0 0 0< o o< v o 0 0 0< o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p = o e o e o v o 0 0 o v v o 0 ® OFFICE c e e c e ° v p o e D v o o c o 0 0 0 o c o G o e c°c o o v o o`d°o e o 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0< o< c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p o G o 0 o v o v o o c o G v o e°e e o e �e c e e G o v e o e c c o o v c v v a c c 4 c p o v c v o 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e e e v p o c 4 0 4 p 4 o v o e D o o v e e o v o 0 0 0 < c o v o o v c v o d o 0 0 4 p O° O° O O v° O< v O O O O O° O O p° O O v° P v o°e o v o 0 0 o b e°v o e e o c o 0 0 0 o c c`c a`c v e v a c o o p c v e o v e v o o v o 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 o v o 4 v < O - [ t C° G C 4 G G p G 4 C D 4 O O° O OFFICE INDUSTRIAL e o v o v P o e o � o o v o o p-t°r`-<`-�—`[-`T`<--t—e--pip-.<-e `°° °° MIXED RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT _ RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY SI ® REDENTIA L MEDIUM DENSITY ® RESIDENT IAL HIGH DENSITY- °e°<°c AGRICULTURE` ® Offl' \�: �.`4 't,r :.F-Fr qi• cy ..r- `r c c-r PARKS OPEN SPACE PUBLIC SEMI PUBLIC o e c < o`o^P e o o v o 0 0 �pO aUHN'D °°<°ov a.a Rice c t o o c G o v o o< o c G v a c v o 0 o G o o - v o 0 o c Lake O O° O ° O O° 0 0 0 0 0 o c p o 0 0 0 o v e a p e e o e 4 e o 0 o e o o e o 0 0 o p o 0 o c o e e e e P e e e e c o a c c o v e o 0 P o e P p a v p c c e o P o e o c o 0 o v e c`c e o v v v o v v v v v o e e e p o v e e e e e v e o e o v o v o 0 0 0 0 o e o I o 0 0 0 0 0< t < coo v v o c o o < o 0 o v v e o v o e v e e o o v e v v e v e a e e 4 aQ c o< o v o t OHW 99nn o e o v e o e o a o G a c p p o o O o v v e v c t 6/ LI. c v o G o o v o o< v e o v o v o v e c v o d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p c o o c o 0 o v o D o 0 0 0 o o e o°v p o v o e G v v o o p o 0 0 o v o a v o e v v v o e v v v c P p G e v v e p o a c t v°p °O°O°f%9 pO°e°O°O°p°e 0°p`v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o v o o e p o c o e e e e o e c v e e v e e v v v o 4 0 0 o v e o e o e c o o< v v v v e c c o e o o c o 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o e v o o v o o< v o e o 0 o c 4 0 o e e o e o 0 0 0 0 County Road Road 61 Corridor Study Proposed Land Use p p p p p p p G< p G< p< a< p 0 o v p v o 0 o a v o 4 e o°e c o 0 0 o p o o v o o v c o 0 0 0 o v< o 0 o v a o°o °°°°e v°o°c°i v °° o`o° " v o c c o •c d< o 0 o c c c c c o c c D D o v�o 0 o°°`` v v cb v G o o c c`e`c Council March 20, 2015 Ms. Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: City of Chanhassen, CSAII 61 Corridor Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Incomplete for Review Metropolitan Council Review File No. 20265-8 Metropolitan Council District 4 Dear Ms. Aanenson: The Metropolitan Council received the City's CSAH 61 Corridor comprehensive plan amendment (CPA) for review on March 2, 2015. Council staff finds that parts of the CPA submittal are incomplete and further review has been suspended pending receipt of the following: REQUIRED INFORMATION: Regional Parks (Jan Youngquist, 651-602-1029) The CPA is incomplete for regional parks review. The Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail is adjacent to the County Road 61 Corridor Study Area. The regional trail is located on a corridor that is owned by Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority (HCRRA) and is managed by Three Rivers Park District through a permit with HCRRA. The regional trail is an interim use on a corridor that is protected for transportation purposes if needed in the future. The Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail is a component of the Regional Parks System, which is governed by the Council's Regional Parks Policy Plan (RPPP). The RPPP protects the regional trail corridor from being converted to uses other than for future transportation purposes. The CPA proposes to guide the land use of a parcel that is owned by HCRRA and includes the regional trail as "Residential Medium Density". In order to be complete for review and conform to the 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan (RPPP), the land use of the parcel circled in pink on the graphic below should be guided as either "Public Semi Public" or "Parks Open Space" to acknowledge the long term intended use of the parcel for either regional trail or transportation purposes. ADVISORY COMMENTS: Forecasts (Todd Graham, 651-602-1322) The City offers that the CPA will reduce office and office industrial land supply by -99 acres, and that the communitywide forecast for employment would be reduced by-1,468jobs in 2030 and beyond. Concurrently, the CPA would increase medium- and high -density residential land supply by +105 acres and mixed -use residential by 429 acres, and the forecast for households would increase by +747 households in 2030 and beyond. Council staff find: This CPA will increase housing capacity in the CSAH 61 corridor, but adjustments to the forecast set maintained by the Metropolitan Council are not necessary. w .metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 • (6511 602-1000 • Fee (651) 602-1550 a TIT (651) 291-0904 An Equal Oppo nfty Employer Ms. Kate Aanenson March 20, 2015 Page 2 of 3 The City may indicate forecast adjustments in its 2030 comprehensive plan, with or without concurrent changes to the Council's Thrive 2040 forecast. Council staff find that adjustments to the forecast set maintained by the Council are not necessary. Council staff have already anticipated land use changes to provide more medium- and high -density residential land in Chanhassen. The City can request adjustments to forecasts for TAZs # 144 and 145 (this includes all the land between Highway 212 and the City's southern boundary) when the City and Metropolitan Council next revise zonal forecasts. Regional Parks (Jan Youngquist, 651-602-1029) • Although not part of the County Road 61 Corridor Study Area as described in the CPA, an adjacent parcel is also owned by HCRRA and includes the Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail, as shown circled in orange on the graphic below. This parcel is guided with a land use of "Residential Large Lot." When the City prepares its 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the land use of this parcel should be guided as either "Public Semi Public" or "Parks Open Space" to he consistent with the adjacent HCRRA parcel. • The CPA was reviewed based on the 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan. The Metropolitan Council adopted the 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan (RPPP) on February 11, 2015. The 2040 RPPP includes a new regional trail search corridor that is located in the CPA study area - the County Road 61 Regional Trail Search Corridor. When the City prepares its 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the regional trail search corridor along County Road 61 should be acknowledged. Wastewater Services (Roger Janzig, 651-602-1119) The City will need to update, and receive Metropolitan Council approval on, its Comprehensive Plan; including its Tier 11 Comprehensive Sewer Plan, prior to the installation of any sanitary sewer improvements south of County Road 61 (Flying Cloud Drive). Ms. Kate Aanenson March 20, 2015 Page 3 of 4 Environmental Review (Jim Larsen, 651-602-1159) Council environmental review staff is in favor of Scenario #2 for the Assumption Creek area, as presented in the Corridor Plan. It is our opinion that utilizing density transfer to focus planned development to the south side of Assumption Creek and not subject the Creek to two planned crossings that would be necessary for Scenario 41 and the proposed placement of the area north of the Creek into a permanent conservation easement would significantly reduce environmental impacts to this sensitive area. We are also in favor of the recommended clean-up (if necessary) and conversion of the three parcels south of CSAH 61 to Park and Open Space use. After the supplemental information is received and evaluated, if staff finds the plan complete the Council's review process will be restarted. If you have any questions about the information requested in this letter or about the review process, call the technical reviewers directly, or Angela R. Torres, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1566. Sincere, *LisaBeth fBarajiManager Local Planning Assistance CC: Crystal Sheppeck, Minnesota Housing Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT Metro Deb Barber, Metropolitan Council District 4 Angela R. Torres, Sector Representative/Principal Reviewer Rays Esmaeili, Reviews Coordinator .4'iiCoi"DevtLPdCCommunitiesiChanhawnVenerr11a14IClanhassen 1015 CPA _20165ACSAH 61-11cauylele.da it Metropolitan Council March 20, 2015 Ms. Kate Aanenson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: City of Chanhassen, CSAH 61 Corridor Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Incomplete for Review Metropolitan Council Review File No. 20265-8 Metropolitan Council District 4 Dear Ms. Aanenson: The Metropolitan Council received the City's CSAH 61 Corridor comprehensive plan amendment (CPA) for review on March 2, 2015. Council staff finds that parts of the CPA submittal are incomplete and Further review has been suspended pending receipt of the following: REQUIRED INFORMATION: Regional Parks (Jan Youngquist, 651-602-1029) The CPA is incomplete for regional parks review. The Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail is adjacent to the County Road 61 Corridor Study Area. The regional trail is located on a corridor that is owned by Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority (HCRRA) and is managed by Three Rivers Park District through a permit with HCRRA. The regional trail is an interim use on a corridor that is protected for transportation purposes if needed in the future. The Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail is a component of the Regional Parks System, which is governed by the Council's Regional Parks Policy Plan (RPPP). The RPPP protects the regional trail corridor from being converted to uses other than for future transportation purposes. The CPA proposes to guide the land use of a parcel that is owned by HCRRA and includes the regional trail as "Residential Medium Density". In order to be complete for review and conform to the 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan (RPPP), the land use of the parcel circled in pink on the graphic below should be guided as either "Public Semi Public" or "Parks Open Space" to acknowledge the long tern intended use of the parcel for either regional trail or transportation purposes. ADVISORY COMMENTS: Forecasts (Todd Graham, 651-602-1322) The City offers that the CPA will reduce office and office industrial land supply by -99 acres, and that the communitywide forecast for employment would be reduced by -1,468 jobs in 2030 and beyond. Concurrently, the CPA would increase medium- and high -density residential land supply by +105 acres and mixed -use residential by +29 acres, and the forecast for households would increase by +747 households in 2030 and beyond. Council staff find: This CPA will increase housing capacity in the CSAH 61 corridor, but adjustments to the forecast set maintained by the Metropolitan Council are not necessary. w .metrocou dl.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 • (651) 602-1000 • Fax (651) 602-1550 • M (651) 291-0904 An Equal Oppartu yEmployer Ms. Kate Aanenson March 20, 2015 Page 2 of 3 The City may indicate forecast adjustments in its 2030 comprehensive plan, with or without concurrent changes to the Council's Thrive 2040 forecast. Council staff find that adjustments to the forecast set maintained by the Council are not necessary. Council staff have already anticipated land use changes to provide more medium- and high -density residential land in Chanhassen. The City can request adjustments to forecasts for TAZs #144 and 145 (this includes all the land between Highway 212 and the City's southern boundary) when the City and Metropolitan Council next revise zonal forecasts. Regional Parks (Jan Youngquist, 651-602-1029) • Although not part of the County Road 61 Corridor Study Area as described in the CPA, an adjacent parcel is also owned by HCRRA and includes the Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail, as shown circled in orange on the graphic below. This parcel is guided with a land use of "Residential Large Lot." When the City prepares its 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the land use of this parcel should be guided as either "Public Semi Public" or "Parks Open Space" to be consistent with the adjacent HCRRA parcel. The CPA was reviewed based on the 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan. The Metropolitan Council adopted the 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan (RPPP) on February 11, 2015. The 2040 RPPP includes a new regional trail search corridor that is located in the CPA study area - the County Road 61 Regional Trail Search Corridor. When the City prepares its 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the regional trail search corridor along County Road 61 should be acknowledged. Wastewater Services (Roger Jam*, 651-602-1119) The City will need to update, and receive Metropolitan Councilgporoval on its Comprehensive Plan; including its Tier H Comprehensive Sewer Plan, prior to the installation of any sanitary sewer improvements south of County Road 61 (Flying Cloud Drive). Ms. Kate Aanenson March 20, 2015 Page 3 of 4 Environmental Review (Jim Larsen, 651-602-1159) Council environmental review staff is in favor of Scenario #2 for the Assumption Creek area, as presented in the Corridor Plan. It is our opinion that utilizing density transfer to focus planned development to the south side of Assumption Creek and not subject the Creek to two planned crossings that would be necessary for Scenario #1 and the proposed placement of the area north of the Creek into a permanent conservation easement would significantly reduce environmental impacts to this sensitive area. We are also in favor of the recommended clean-up (if necessary) and conversion of the three parcels south of CSAH 61 to Park and Open Space use. After the supplemental information is received and evaluated, if staff finds the plan complete the Council's review process will be restarted. If you have any questions about the information requested in this letter or about the review process, call the technical reviewers directly, or Angela R. Torres, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1566. Sincere, L� eth Bazaj ,Manager Local Planning Assistance CC: Crystal Sheppeck, Minnesota Housing Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT Metro Deb Barber, Metropolitan Council District 4 Angela R. Torres, Sector Representative/Principal Reviewer Raya Esmaeili, Reviews Coordinator N. iCot mDev.LP.41Com miliesi.Chanhassen!LeitersOOMChanhassen 2015 CPA_20265-8 CSAH61-1wonW1e1e.di= February 27, 2015 CITY OF WNSENReview Coordinator 7700 Market Boulevard Metropolitan Council PO Box 147 390 Robert Street North Chanhassen, MN55317 St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 Administration Re: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Phone: 952.227.1100 Chapter 2, Land Use Fax:952.227,1110 Dear Review Coordinator: Building Inspections Phone: 952.227,1180 Enclosed for Metropolitan Council Review are proposed amendments to the City of Fax: 952.227.1190 Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan: Land Use Map Amendment within the Engineering CSAH 61 corridor including revisions to figures 2-1 and 2-2 reflecting these map Phone: 952.227.1160 changes. Please note that all adjacent jurisdictions have completed their review and Fax: 952.227.1170 waived Comment. Finance Enclosed are copies of the following items: Phone:952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 . Certified Copy of Amendment Resolution Park & Recreation • Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form Phone: 952.227.1120 • City Council Staff Report dated February 23, 2015 Fax: 952.227.1110 • CSAH 61 Corridor Plan Recreation Center • CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use Amendment Spreadsheet 2310 Coulter Boulevard • Location Map Phone: 952.227.1400 • Existing/Proposed Land Use Map Fax:952.227.1404 Thank you for your assistance in this matter. I have previously emailed all this Planning & information to reviewcoordinatorCa)rnetc.state mn us. If you require additional Natural Resources �/ Phone: 952.227.1130 information, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or Fax: 952.227.1110 bfzenerousAci.chanhassen urn us. Public Works Sincere 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Robert Generous, AICP Phone: 952.227.1125 Senior Planner Fax: 952.227.1110 Enclosures Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Todd Gerhardt, City Manager &V W8ui®CO� 61�ruralmvc Imalad mcdon SCANNED Chanhassen is 2 Community for Ute - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of Resolution No. 2015-13, "Resolution Approving Land Use Map Amendments within the CSAH 61 Corridor to the City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan" dated February 23, 2015 with the original copy on file in my office and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof Witness my hand and official seal at Chanhassen, Minnesota, this 25'b day of February, 2015. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: February 23 2015 RESOLUTION NO: 2015-13 MOTION BY: Rvan SECONDED BY: Campion RESOLUTION APPROVING LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS WITHIN THE CSAH 61 CORRIDOR TO THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study was finalized and approved by the City Council on October 28, 2014. A joint meeting with City Council and the Planning Commission was held on December 1, 2014 to review the CSAH 61 Corridor study results. WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen submitted the proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendments within the CSAH 61 Corridor to adjacent communities on December 12, 2014, for their review. There were no objections or negative comments received. The 60-day agency review period ended on February 10, 2015. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing Wreview the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendments on February 3, 2015, found the amendments consistent with the City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan and voted to recommend that City Council adopt the amendments. WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council held a hearing on February 23, 2015 to review the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council approves the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendments within the CSAH 61 Corridor subject to review and determination of consistency with the Metropolitan Council 2030 System Plan. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 23`d day of February, 2015. ATTE LM Todd Gerhardt, City Manager YES NO Campion Laufenburger McDonald Ryan Tjornhom 6.-M Dqthy L—auferlurger, Mayor ABSENT Figure 2-1. LAND USE TABLE IN 5-YEAR STAGES Existing and Planned Land Use Table (in acres) Within Urban Service Area - Minimum Maximum Existing (2000) 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Change 2000-2030 Residential Land Uses Low Density Residential (developed) 12 4 2,600 3,100 3,913 4,498 4,540 4.692 2,092 Low Density Residential (vacant) 2,102 1,602 779 201 152 - Medium Density Residential (developed) 4 8 155 300 326 356 381 496 341 Medium Density Residential (vacant) 245 100 170 140 115 - High Density Residential (developed) 8 16 55 112 140 180 195 240 185 High Density Residential (vacant) 163 106 100 53 45 - Mixed Use Primarily Residential' (developed) 8 1 20 30 40 45 50 60 72 42 Mixed Use Pnmanly Residential' (vacant) 120 10 27 22 12 - C/I Land Uses Est. Employees/Acre Commercial (developed) 25 240 270 300 318 320 328 88 Commercial (vacant) 88 58 28 10 8 - Industrial (developed) 7 500 632 760 801 813 843 343 Industrial (vacant) 383 251 83 1 42 30 - Office (developed) 28 240 260 242 263 272 277 37 Office (vacant) 99 79 35 14 5 - Mixed Use Primarily C/I' (developed) 26 35 40 45 55 60 72 37 Mixed Use Primarily C/I' (vacant) 30 25 27 17 12 - Extraclive Public/Semi Public Land Uses Institutional 1,213 1,213 1.213 1.213 1.213 1,213 - Parks and Recreation 417 430 438 457 457 1 457 40 Open Space 934 934 9" 944 944 944 10 Roadway Rights of Way 1.237 1.237 1,237 1.237 1,237 1,237 - Ublity Railroad Airport Subtotal Sewered 10,786 10,799 10,852 10,871 10,871 10,871 3,215 Outside Urban Service Area Minimum lot size Maximum lot size Exists n0 (2000) 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Charge 2900-2030 Rural Residential 2.5 acres or less Rural Residential 2.5 -10 acres 2.5 na 971 971 948 948 948 948 123) Rural Residential 10-40 acres Agncultural 40, acres 40 47 19 - - - (40) Agnculture land use 904 904 882 882 882 882 (22) Subtotal Unsewered 1,915 1.902 1,849 1,830 1,830 1,830 (85) Undeveloped Wetlands (within land use designations) - __ 2,210 2,210 2,210 2,210 2,210 2,210 - Open Water, Rivers and Streams -- 2.059 2.059 2.059 2,059 2,059 2,059 - Total 14,760 14,760 14,760 14,760 14,760 14,760 3,130 C:\Users\karene\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\7VJA9TOV\Land Use 5 year revised CSAH 61 August 2, 2005 figure 2-2 2008 - 21 Land Use Commercial Office/Industrial Office Parks 8 n S Public/Semi-Pub Residential Larg Residential Low Residential Medi Residential High Mixed Use Undevelo able TOTAL Undevelopable Lakes, Flood laic Road R' ht of-W ricuRure TOTAL 0 Inlwmi —wm, x.-i i2:Jp015 it Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form Please complete the following information. When completing this form electronically, fields in grey need your input. Use the Tab key to quickly navigate to each field. Question 37 on the last page of this form is for MUSA Expansions or Changes only and does not contain grey fields, but is directly editable. The form for Question 37 is also available in Excel format. htto://www metrocouncil org[plannina/assistance/resources htm This form is available in electronic format on the Metropolitan Council's website: htti)://www metrocouncil ora/planninci/assistance/resources htm. AMENDMENT NAME CSAH 61 Corridor COMMUNITY PROFILE AND AMENDMENT OVERVIEW 1. Please provide the following information: Local governmental unit: City of Chanhassen Contact name: Kate Aanenson. AICP Contact title: Community Development Director Address: 7700 Market Boulevard. P.O. Box 147 City, State, Zip: Chanhassen, MN 55317 Telephone number: (952) 227-1139 FAX number Email address Date of preparation: (952)227-1110 kaanenson(&ci.chanhass en. mn.us February 24, 2017 2. Identify the type of amendment and describe. Check all that apply: ® 2a. Land use change: Amend the land uses within the CSAH 61 corridor in Chanhassen. ❑ 2b. MUSA expansion or change: ® 2c. Text Change: Amend Figures 2-1 and 2-2 of the Land Use Element ❑ 2d.Other: 3. Provide a description of the amendment: Location: CSAH 61 corridor in southern Chanhassen The County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 61 Corridor is a key southern gateway to the City of Chanhassen. Impending transportation and infrastructure changes can increase the development potential of parcels within the corridor. The city completed a framework plan that will guide future public and private -sector decision making, shaping this important city gateway. The City of Chanhassen initiated the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study to investigate future land use Brief description: recommendations consistent with the gateway's importance. Affected area, in acres: 288 Number of housing units in CPA area, if any: 8 existing May 2011 1 It Metropolitan eonaca Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form 4. Indicate the official local status of the plan amendment. Check all that apply. NOTE: The local governing body must take action on the proposed amendment before submittal to the Metropolitan Council. Action ® Acted upon by the planning commission. ® Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council review Date of Action February 3, 2015 February 23, 2015 S. List the adjacent local governments, school districts, and other jurisdictions that were contacted and the date the copies were sent. Notifying adjacent governmental units and affected school districts is one of the criteria the Council will use to determine whether an application is deemed complete for review. City of Eden Prairie, City of Shorewood, City of Excelsior, City of Victoria, City of Shakopee, Hennepin Count}. Carer County, Scott County, Jackson Township, Minnetonka School District, Eastern Carver County School District, City of Chaska, City of Minnetonka, Minnesota Department of Transportation. December 12, 2014. 6. Identify outstanding issues or conditions made in the Metropolitan Council's review of the municipality's 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update or subsequent comprehensive plan amendments: ® The Council's review(s) did not identify any issues or conditions. ❑ The Council's review(s) identified the following issues/conditions: Issue/Condition Steps taken or future planned actions, including date 7. Will/has and environmental review (Environmental Assessment Worksheet, Environmental Impact Statement, or Alternative Urban Areawide Review) be/been completed for this site? ® No, none required. ❑ Yes. Indicate the type of review and approximate date of completion. If completed, include a summary of the findings below: May 2011 it Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form SECTION 2: FORECASTS fitto://www.metrocouncii.org/planninalLPHILPHSect2.pdf S. Does the plan amendment change the population, household, or employment forecasts that appear in the Metropolitan Council's published forecast tables? Published forecast tables can be found online on the Council's website: http://www.metrocouncil.ota/metroarea/stats.litm. Please note that the Council's practice is to round forecasts to the nearest hundred. No, no change in community -level forecasts. This plan amendment enables development that is ❑ already assumed in current, approved forecasts. ® Yes. Identify the net changes to community -level forecasts in the table below: INet Changes to Community -level Forecasts (additions or reductions due to the amendment) f la 2010 2020 2030 Population 1,715 Households 747 Employment -1468 eItem _�30 Land Use •Item v11 Housing •Item #12 Critical Area / MNRRA •Item *13 Trip Generation •Item #22 Wastewater Flow •Item #32 Water Supply SECTION 3: LAND USE http://www.metrocouncii.oro/olannina/LPH/LPHSect3.pdf 9. Does the plan amendment propose any impacts to wetlands located on the site? ❑ No wetlands on the site. ❑ No, no impacts to wetlands located on the site. ® Yes. Describe the type of wetland(s), potential impacts, and mitigation plans below: Potential impacts will be determined and reviewed as part of development proposals in the future. The City will comply with the Wetland Conservation Act and city code requirements. 10. Describe land use changes in acres applicable to this amendment site in the table below. Use the community's land use categories as contained in the local comprehensive plan. ❑ Not applicable. No land use changes proposed. Land Use Designation (fill in All Land Uses in CPA Area Residential Land Uses Only the community's specific land Acres # of Units & Density Range Pre -CPA Post -CPA Pre -CPA Post -CPA use categories) 847 824 Agricultural Office 159 100 Office Industrial 82 42 Park & Open Space Mixed Use (assume 70%residential/30% 42 52 commercial) 0 29 0, 10 units/ac. 171, 10 units/ac. Residential Large Lot 39 16 16, 0.4 units/ac. 7, 0.4 units/ac. Residential Medium Density 0 90 0, 4-8 units/ac. 458, 4-8 units/ac. Residential High Density 67 82 572 8-16 units/ac. 699, 8-16 units/ac. May 2011 it Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form -- -- -- Totals t 256 1256 - 5" 1335 CPA =Comprehensive Plan -Amendment ll. Housing: If the proposed amendment changes the amount of land city-wide staged for development for the 2011-2020 timeframe for medium density, high density, or mixed use residential development, complete the following table to identify the amount of land available pre- and post - amendment. Fill in all land use categories g that allow multi -family residential development Acres city-wide for each land use category Pre -CPA Developed Developable Total Acres Acres Acres* A B A— 8= C Acres city-wide for each land use category Post -CPA I Amendment Developable . Acres" Acres D C+ D= E * Developable means land planned for urban residential development, infill, or redevelopment for the 2011-2020 timeframe. ** Amendment acres from the municipality's response to Question #10 above. 12. Mississippi River Critical Area / MNRRA: Does the proposed amendment include any land within the designated Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA) and Critical Area boundaries? ® No. Not a community with CA / MNRRA boundaries or project site is not within CA / MNRRA boundaries. ❑ Yes. Describe below how Critical Area guidelines and MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan policies are being addressed with this amendment. 13. Trip Generation: Complete the table below using the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual to show whether this plan amendment increases or decreases trip generation compared to the planned land use and transportation element of the community's comprehensive plan. Trip Generation for the Site Trip Generation for the Site Based on Planned Land Use Based on Planned Land Use 'Pre-AmendmentPost-Amendment Estimated average daily traffic 29,755 25,737 Estimated peak hour traffic am. 3,758, p.m. 3,724 am. 3,195, p.m. 3,145 14. Will these changes require improvements to the existing local and regional road network or to interchanges beyond what is in the community's current transportation plan? ❑ No, existing local and regional road networks can accommodate increase. ® Yes, improvements are needed. Describe improvements and who will pay for them below: Local street access to CSAH 61 will be needed at the time of development. CSAH 61 is currently under construction to improve traffic flows. The 101 river bridge is currently under construction to four lanes with a pedestrian trail to improve capacity and raise out of 100 year flood elevation. Highway 101 from CSAH 61 to Pioneer trail is being studied for improvements. Carver County, Chanhassen and NfiMT will all participate in the upgrade of this roadway. May 2011 4 ::11A Metropolitan Council u Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form 15. If this site has direct access to a Principal or "A" Minor Arterial, is the location and spacing consistent with applicable County guidelines or MnDOT's Access Management Guidelines? (n1ttpJ/www.oim dot/state mn u5/access/index html) ❑ Not applicable. No direct access to a Principal or "A" Minor Arterial. ❑ No. Explain: ® Yes. Describe below: Local street access will be developed to CSAH 61. 16. Will the amendment increase or decrease by 10% or more the 2030 forecasted households, population, or employment forecasts allocated to the development's Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ)? ❑ Yes. ® No. If Yes, explain below: Transit and Other Modes of Transportatio 17. Is the amendment likely to have any impact, positive or negative, on transit service? ® No, not currently served by transit or will not affect transit. ❑ Yes. List existing routes, describe changes, and identify proposed/necessary transit facility improvements (e.g. shelters, park & rides, etc) below: 18. Does the amendment include Traffic Demand Management (TDM) strategies or land use and urban design measures, if applicable? ❑ Yes. ® No. If No, explain why not. If Yes, describe below (e.g. car and van pooling, flexible work hours, mixed land uses that discourage vehicle trips and promote walking, biking, ridesharing, and transit): Development strategies will be determined at the time of development review. 19. Does the amendment include any pedestrian or bicycle access or facilities? ❑ Yes. ® No. If No, explain why not. If yes, describe access/facilities below: May 2011 5 it metropolitan Couneiy Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form 20. Does the amendment affect any airport functions? ® Not applicable. Site is not within airport compatibility area or search area. ❑ No. The site is within airport compatibility area or search area, but no impacts. Explain below: ❑ Yes. The CPA site i5 within an airport compatibility area or search area, and experiences off -airport impacts related to the following: ❑ Aircraft Noise. Describe whether the community has adopted land use compatibility guidelines, including preventive and corrective noise abatement and/or mitigation measures being applied. ❑ Airport Safety Zoning. Indicate whether the community participates on a joint airport/community zoning board, has an approved airport zoning ordinance, and how those requirements relate to the proposal. ❑ Airport Infrastructure. Describe how the proposal affects or is affected by the provision of services or facilities to the airport (e.g. roads, utilities, police/fire, etc.). SECTION 5: WATER RESOURCES htto :;;r..rv, --- _-_ _ora/olannino/LPH/LPHSectS.pdf 21. What type of wastewater treatment will be used to serve the proposed amendment? ❑ Individual Sewage Treatment System (ISTS) ❑ Privately Owned / Community Treatment System ❑ Local / Municipal Owned Wastewater Treatment Plant ® Regional Wastewater Treatment 22. Wastewater Flow: Complete the following table to show whether the amendment increases or decreases wastewater flow compared to the currently planned land use and sewer flow projections. Year Total Community Flow Total Community Flow 2010 1 4.46 1 4.46 1 May 2011 6 it Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form 2020 5.% 5.96 2030 7.3 7.3 mgd mmillion gallons Der day 23. Does the local wastewater system have adequate capacity or staged capacity to accommodate the proposed amendment? ® Yes. ❑ No. Explain response below: City untertook a Utility feasibility study in conjunction with the proposed amendment. 24. Does the regional wastewater system have adequate capacity or staged capacity to accommodate the proposed amendment? ® Yes. ❑ No. Explain response below: 25. Has the community and/or Metropolitan Council identified an inflow and infiltration (I/I) problem? ® Yes. ❑ No. If Yes, describe steps taken to address the I/1 issue and plans for action below: City has drafted a five year work plan. City working with Metropolitan Council to televise sewer mains to determine 1/1 problem areas. City is undertaking 1/1 program including sewer line replacement, community education, specifying I/I resistant manhole structures, etc. 26. Identify regional interceptor(s) that will be impacted by these changes and indicate if flows will be diverted from one interceptor service area to another below. Lake Ann 27. Does the amendment include any wastewater flow to an adjacent community? For new inter -community agreements, the receiving community must also amend the sewer element of its plan. ❑ Yes. Enclose a copy of the inter -community agreement with the amendment submittal. ® No. 28. Will stormwater runoff generated from the amendment be treated on -site? ❑ No. Check one of the following and describe: ❑ Runoff will not receive treatment. Describe below: ❑ Runoff will be treated off -site. Identify off -site treatment facility below: May 2011 7 tMetropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form ® Yes. Describe type and level of on -site pollutant removal treatment/mitigation plans below: At the time of development, General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination" (NPDES construction permit) will be required and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) must be developed. 29. Does the community an updated local surface water management plan? ® Yes. Year adopted: 2006 ❑ No. Explain below: In processing of updating plan in compliance with Water Management Organizations. 30. Does the community have an adopted erosion control or stormwater management ordinance? ® Yes. Year adopted: 1992 ❑ No. Explain below: Storm water management ordinance updated in 2008. Erosion control ordinance updated in 2011. In process of updting storm water management ordinance in compliance with the current NPDES permit. 31. Does the community have an updated water supply plan? ® Yes. Year adopted: 200R ❑ No. 32. Will the amendment increase or decrease projected water use from the community's current water supply plan? ❑ Yes. Provide the water supply plan amendment as an attachment to describe necessary facilities improvements or changes. ® No increase or decrease in projected water use from the water supply plan. 33. Does the amendment include, or is it adjacent to or within 1/2 mile of an existing or planned regional park, reserve, or trail as identified in the Metropolitan Council's 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan? ® Yes. ❑ No. If Yes, indicate the name of the regional park, reserve, or trail and describe potential impacts and mitigations plans below: City will provide local connections to trails on the Hennepin County Regional Trail corridor, the CSAH 61 corridor and the 101 river bridge. 34. Does the community have a Parks & Open Space Plan including regional park elements? ® Yes. Year adopted: ZOOS ❑ No. May 2011 S tMetropolitan ConacH Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form 35. Will the amendment require changes in zoning or subdivision ordinances, the capital improvement program (CIP), or other official controls? ® Yes. ❑ No. If Yes, describe proposed changes and timeline for making those changes below: The properties will need to be rezoned at the time of development. This land is outside the current urban services area. Utility services will need to be extended to this area to accommodate the future development. 36. Does the community have natural resources protection ordinances, including those addressing wetlands, tree preservation, or steep slopes? ® Yes. ❑ No. If Yes, identify applicable ordinances below: The city has adopted wetland protection, shoreland management, tree preservation, bluff protection and Bluff Creek overlay ordinances. DON'T FORGET! A complete comprehensive plan amendment submittal must include the following: ❑ Completed CPA Submittal Form ❑ Staff report regarding CPA ❑ Other relevant information related to the CPA And the following color maps: ❑ General location of CPA ❑ Current planned land use ❑ Proposed planned land use change ❑ Current sewer staging ❑ Proposed sewer staging changes ❑ Existing land cover (MLCCS if available) May 2011 37. MUSA Expansion or Staging Changes Only. Complete the following table for amendments proposing a MUSA expansion or development staging change, documenting both average net density of sewered residential development since the community's local 2008 comprehensive plan update was adopted and remaining land guided for residential uses to 2030. This information is needed for the Council to review and evaluate the amendment for potential impacts on the regional systems. The following tables are also available on the Council's website in Microsoft Excel format with built-in automatic calculations of net residential acres, net density, and estimated developable acres. Iittp/_www mgt QWuT ii'org�F?Innni a�sis�anclresou e gym. NOTE: Communities that participate in the Council's Plat Monitoring Program do not need to complete this form. Data from the Program will be used in place of information here. and Constructed From Present Single Multi- Acres Public Acres Family Family Wetland Parks & Arterial # of # of Acres Gross &Water Open Roads Units Units Residential Bodies Space ROW Development Year Year _ _Name _ Approved Built A B C D F F Acres Net Other Net Density Undeveloped Residential (Units Land* Acres /Acre) C H- C D E-F (o+B)/H G TOTALS 1 I I I I I I I I I * Describe on a separate page any other undeveloped land that does not fall under one of the other categories In the table above, Including steep slopes, outlots for future residential or commercial development, or other land protected by local ordinances. for Residential Uses through 2030 Estimated Acre Estimated Acres Estimated Wetlands & Water Public Parks & Developable Gross Acres Bodies Open Space Acres A B c D= A-B-C Lowest Allowed Density Units/Acre Highest Allowed Density Units/Acre May 2011 10 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: February 23, 2015 RESOLUTION NO: 2015-13 MOTION BY: Ryan SECONDED BY: Campion RESOLUTION APPROVING LAND USE MAP AMENDMENTS WITHIN THE CSAH 61 CORRIDOR TO THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use and Utility Study was finalized and approved by the City Council on October 28, 2014. A joint meeting with City Council and the Planning Commission was held on December 1, 2014 to review the CSAH 61 Corridor study results. WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen submitted the proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendments within the CSAH 61 Corridor to adjacent communities on December 12, 2014, for their review. There were no objections or negative comments received. The 60-day agency review period ended on February 10, 2015. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to'review the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendments on February 3, 2015, found the amendments consistent with the City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan and voted to recommend that City Council adopt the amendments. WHEREAS, the Chanhassen City Council held a hearing on February 23, 2015 to review the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council approves the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendments within the CSAH 61 Corridor subject to review and determination of consistency with the Metropolitan Council 2030 System Plan. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 23rd day of February, 2015. 77' 4i/ Todd Gerhardt, City Manager YES NO Campion Laufenburger McDonald Ryan Tjomhom ,i.N 6 � DqAny Laufe urger, Mayor ABSENT SCANNED IR / I a / r MR/// -I / % Ate` IIII 555LLLL . �j • 1i ' � � ♦ II, II (((� •�i III % IIIII \t IIII �� I Figure 2-1. LAND USE TABLE IN 5-YEAR STAGES Existing and Planned Land Use Table tin acres) Within Urban Service Are v 2010 2015 2020 2026 2030 2Change Minimum Maximum Residential Land Uses Low Density Residential (developed) 1.2 4 2,600 3,100 3,913 4,498 4,540 4,692 2,092 Low Density Residential (vacant) 2,102 1,602 779 201 152 - Medium Density Residential (developed) 4 8 155 300 326 356 381 496 341 Medium Density Residential (vacant) 245 100 170 140 115 - High Density Residential (developed) 8 1 16 55 112 140 1 180 1951 240 1 185 High Density Residential (vacant) 163 106 100 53 45 - Mixed Use Primarily Residential' (developed) 8 20 30 40 45 50 60 72 42 Mixed Use Primarily Residential* (vacant) 20 10 27 22 12 - C8 Land Uses Est Employees/Acre Commercial (developed) 25 240 270 300 318 320 328 88 Commercial (vacant) 88 58 28 10 8 - Industnal (developed) 7 500 632 1 760 801 813 943 343 Industrial (vacant) 383 251 83 42 1 30 1 - Offioe(developed) 28 240 260 242 263 272 277 37 Office (vacant) 99 79 35 14 5 - Mixed Use Primarily C/1' (developed) 26 35 40 45 55 60 72 37 Mixed Use Primarily C/1' (vacant) 30 25 27 17 12 - Px rective Public/Semi Public Land Uses Institutional 11,213 1 1,213 1,213 1 1,213 1,213 1,213 1 - Parks and Recreation 417 430 438 457 457 457 40 Open Space 934 934 944 9" 044 944 10 Roadway Rights of Way 1,237 1.237 1.237 1,237 1,237 1,237 - utility - Railroad _ Airport - Subtotal Severed 10,786 10,799 10,852 10,871 10,871 10,871 3,215 Outside Urban Service Are - minknum -.. btfte IAmdman lot eke - 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2000.2030 Rural Residential 2.5 acres or less - Rural Residential 2.5 -10 acres 2.5 na 971 971 948 948 948 948 (23) Rural Residential 10-40 acres - Agdculturel40+acres 40 27 19 - - - (40) Agriculture land use 904 904 882 882 882 582 (22) Subtotal Unsevered 1,915 1,902 1,849 1,830 1,830 1,830 (85) Undeveloped Wetlands (within land use designations) 2,210 2,210 2.210 2,210 2,210 2,210 - Open Water, Rivers and Streams - 2,059 2,059 2,059 2,059 2,059 2,059 - Total 14.760 14,760 14,780 14,780 14,760 14,780 3,130 C:\Users\kareneWppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Intemet Files\Content.OUtlook\7VJA9TOV\Land Use 5 year revised CSAH 61 August 2, 2005 Fi 2-2 2008 - 2030 land Use Co 2020 2030 Land Use Plan Land Use Plan Change 2020-2030 Land Use Acres IPercent Acres Percent Acres Commercial 142 1.2% 328 2.2% 186 Office/Industrial 694 5.7% 843 5.7% 149 „ Office 114 0.9% 277 1.9% 163 , a, ,,, Parks & Open Space 1,297 10.6% 1,401 9.5% 104 Public/Semi-Public 1,204 9.9% 1,210 82% 6 Residential Large Lot 870 7.1% 948 6.4% 78 Residential Low Density 3,295 27.6%— 4,692 31.8% 1,397 Residential Medium Density 219 1.8% 496 3A% 277 Residential High Density 120 1.0% 240 1.6% 120 Mixed Use 51 0.4% 1" 1.0% 93 Undevelopable 4200 34.4% 181 28.3% 19 TOTAL 12,206 14,760 2,554 Undevel opable uau,a ra y.n a.e. Lakes, Floodplain, Rivers, Streams 2,037 Road Right -of -Way 1,237 riculture 882 TOTAL 4,156 C'��WrW alTsnp�vyinlsriq Flr�CmwtgL�'iNJMTOWUW uee canperi,p�]WB-A50 '�/$$Y�p15 Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 Mayor Laufenburger: So the motion that I would make is that the Chanhassen City Council affirm the decision of the Planning Commission denying the variance and enforcing the appropriate building codes. Excuse me, denying the variance and accepting the Findings of Fact of the Planning Commission. Insuring that enforcement of the building codes would be applied to the expansion building that was already put in place and thirdly, that if the applicant chooses to return to the council with a variance for a separate building, that any fees normally associated with that variance application be waived. Can I do that? Roger Knutson: Sure. Councilman McDonald: So that's your motion Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: That's my motion Mr. McDonald. Councilman McDonald: I'll second. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. We have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Mayor Laufenburger moved, Councilman McDonald seconded that the Chanhassen City Council affirm the decision of the Planning Commission denying variance request #2014-33 and accepts the Findings of Fact of the Planning Commission; insuring that enforcement of the building codes are applied to the expansion building that was already put in place; and if the applicant chooses to return to the council with a variance for a separate building any fees normally associated with that variance application be waived. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you staff. Thank you applicant for allowing us to have good debate about this. We have one more item on our agenda this evening. CSAH 61 CORRIDOR: CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHAPTER 2. LAND USE (LAND USE MAP AND FIGURES 2-1 AND 2-2. Kate Aanenson: Thank you Mayor, members of City Council. This item, as you're aware, we had a joint meeting at the end of the year, in December to talk about where we were with this process and the Planning Commission did hold a hearing and we had a pretty good turnout at that meeting from property owners and neighbors in the area. Obviously they're not here tonight but I'll try to reiterate their concerns. So again the subject area is located along 61. Also kind of the 101 being the main intersect of the, and Bluff Creek Drive being the main east, excuse me. North/south intersect. So what's driving this project as we've talked about is the 101 bridge and then also the upgrade of County Road 61. So we looked at the development constraints. I'm going to go through some of these slides rather quickly. The developmental traits in the area restricted it to less than 200 acres of development so the question was, as the infrastructure being put in place raises the value or the visibility of this property and really to go back and look at the land uses that were put in place to see if they still made sense and look at the appropriate land uses and whether or not we could provide municipal services to the property. So with that we've 56 SCANNED Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 got the river crossing, 61 design. Again the sanitary sewer and water. Looked at the lift stations. Where they would go. Again lift station for this area to develop needs to be developed and that's actually north of Lyman Boulevard so as we informed in the neighborhood meetings that we're a ways from that. I know the City Engineer has an open house tomorrow on the 101 corridor so that's still a lot of questions that people have in this area is when municipal services are going to be provided and it's predicated on what happens to the north. Again looking at where water would come. The City Engineer's recommendation to loop that and I believe that's his intent with the 101 corridor that we've sleeve some of that. Again that's of interest to some of the property owners and we did as the council asked us to do is on the notification for the public hearing before the Planning Commission, notified not only those people along the corridor but also the people that were north that could be impacted by this which would include those people on Lakota. Some of those residents, Mandan Circle and then also the Hesse Farm area and we did have representation from those groups at the Planning Commission who spoke too. So this is the water. So we've got the 101 alignment. So existing land uses are shown on the top half. Again we put a lot of industrial in this area kind of as a place holder. This is all before the DNR bought the Seminary Fen property so we thought kind of a good steward of that property would be if we had an office user and then preserve some of that property but as it turns out that, and that would be area number 2, go back to my laser pointer here. Is actually now the Seminary Fen site there that the DNR interpretative center. So looking at some of those land uses so we also included if you look at 8 and 9, those properties are in the floodplain. Both those property owners were at the meeting, the public hearing before the Planning Commission, although they did not speak. I think most of the property owners that were at the public hearing did not speak. Some of the other people that did speak were people in the Hesse Farm area asking questions about impacts to well. The City Engineer was at that meeting to speak to that. We don't intend to put wells down in this area so that was one of the concems that was addressed. And then some of the other ones were view sheds which we'll talk about in a little bit more detail. So the only down zones then would be that area 8 and 9 and again those are in the floodplain. As we talked about in the work session the goal with getting this land use changes and same with getting funding for some of the other clean up was we know, did when we tried to clean up the Moon Valley site to get what was the shooting range, is to try to get that cleaned up. We didn't point out very well because development wasn't eminent. You're kind of ranked on that so this will help us moving forward that we have a plan that we can demonstrate is developable. So we showed again some of the changes that we intend to do here so this is map area 1. So this is the area just to the west of the Seminary Fen so we just showed how that would look. Again illustratively what our goal would be then to cluster that. So that would go to medium density. And then this would be map area 2, office to parks and open space. This is the Seminary Fen and then large lot residential to medium density again to make some of that work. These are the ones that we're recommending changing. Office, map area 4, office to residential medium. And then map area 4 and 5, on our Comprehensive Plan we always identified this area as a potential commercial so this is what we would call a convenience commercial area so this would have some medium density and then some commercial. A gas station or the like and again we identified that in our Comprehensive Plan when we submitted that or completed that in 2008. Obviously for this to happen 101 needs to be realigned. For any development to happen down here we need again the sewer and water to come down and that's predicated on 101 so that's the message we keep reminding the developers, or the property owners down there. We did include their comments in your packet and again the property owners are supportive of the changes and 57 Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 opportunities to redevelop their property. Again we talked about some of the uses that are down there now getting higher and better uses so this would be office to mixed use and that would be the commercial. This would be the underlying zoning district on that. Then office industrial again to be commercial with 101 being realigned. This is showing the current alignment and then office industrial, the high density residential so we extended that a little bit more so we're just immediately west of what we call the Moon Valley site and this is the Moon Valley site here. This is an area that we did get some comments from the residents in Settlers West were deeply concerned of their view sheds there and wanted us to acquire the properties such as Eden Prairie did on the other side. It's hard to explain to people but there's different ways to get conveyance when you're doing a development. Sometimes a developer will dedicate to the city in lieu of park dedication fees and maybe a tax consequence so we don't know how that all occurred but the mining operation on the Moon Valley site was prior to the development on the Settlers West and that park, which the Richard T. Anderson Park. So this is the Moon Valley over here and this is the Richard T. Anderson so there was no mining on that so it was left in the state. In it's natural state so one of the things that we talked about with the residents with Settlers West, which we spent a lot of time talking about that is they're sitting up here. Their view shed is actually overlooking that. We talked about the retaining wall that will be in place on County Road 61 with the development of that road so really you're overlooking that development. These would be 3 story buildings. So they asked that the Planning Commission revisit when we update the Comprehensive Plan. It's been high density for over 20 years. So the last two Comprehensive Plans which span 10 years so it has been in place for that long. So that was all in place before those homes were built. In addition to that when we, when Moon Valley closes which they anticipate with the completion of 61, in a couple of years. Prior to that we got it cleaned up. It took us quite a few cycles. The developer ultimately paid for getting out all of the lead out of the hillside so it's been cleaned up and really the best way to get this property cleaned up and a good use is have a developer come in. Revegetate. Do a project on the site. We think that's the best way to really to bring that project, to bring this property into the best situation that we can get through. Let the market forces take a hold of that and then get the reclamation of it done. Yes a developer has to revegetate but it's not going to be to this level that we would get with a development proposal so I would say the well and this site were probably the two biggest concerns that we had during the public hearing. Talked about the Richard T. Anderson and that's a little bit different. Again the Settlers West, while it's in the city of Chanhassen, topographically it's really up on the north half so they do get sewer and water from Eden Prairie and come out that way but their view sheds, we did take some conservation easements over some of those slopes up on the top but that was their concern of overlooking that. Again you know the timeframe on that is predicated on getting sewer and water down there so these are some of the properties that we're looking at for the open space. Again these properties are so narrow and are problematic to back flooding on the back comers of these so we think giving them the open space. So one of the questions that did come up on this is, some of the property owners that we did meet with, we invited all the property owners to meet with us prior to the public hearing. That would be separate from the public hearing that all the other surrounding property owners came and some of their concern is, what's going to happen to my property now. While you're legal nonconforming, you can continue to operate the way you're operating today. Not only that you can sell it to somebody else if they continue to operate the way it is. It's when you want to expand. Similar to the circumstance we just talked about tonight. That would change that but it would allow them to continue to operate the way they are ;R Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 now but not expand. And then the other one that would be open space would be, this looks a lot different than this picture now. There's quite a few less cars out there and the operation is a lot different now but again that would be. Mayor Laufenburger: There's less cars today than there is in this picture? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: So they're scaling back? Kate Aanenson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Are people buying the cars? Kate Aanenson: It's salvage. People buy parts. So again open space and again this is one that we talked about before that would be helpful to get the clean up. So how does this relate to what we need to do. So we need to submit this to the Met Council because it's a Comprehensive Plan amendment. So what we're submitting then would show the differences in acreage and I just want to summarize for you really the biggest changes on this is going to be that we're adding additional, more residential. Less office. And so the percent increase would be, decrease would be S percent decrease in the office and then we're increasing the medium density. The commercial we had identified on there so that didn't change too much but we took away that office area and then added more medium density, which we think the market would support. Again there's fantastic views down there too so what we are submitting to the Met Council would be our change. The land use recommendation change so we have to fill out these types of tables to submit to them. We've been working with the Met Council. To date we've met our jurisdiction review comment period so right now as a part of your motion, this is all predicated on the reviewal by the Met Council so what we're recommending is that you adopt the resolution approving the land use amendments within the 61 corridor and these again would be subject to the Metropolitan Council so we will let you know after they approve it. Your motion would be to approve it tonight subject to that but then once they approve it then we will let you know that and then we would modify that with the City's mapping so it would be reflective of what those changes are. With that I'd be happy to answer any questions that you have. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Ms. Aanenson. Are there any questions of Ms. Aanenson regarding this recommendation? Councilwoman Ryan: I do Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: Ms. Aanenson, just for my own clarification. So when, if this goes through and it changes the land use changes, none of the people that are down there, the businesses are down there, they don't have to do anything to their business. 59 Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 Kate Aanenson: No, and again we met with all them. We're not going to buy them out. The market's going to take over so they can continue to operate the way they are today. There are some people that have conditional uses and interim uses that are in violation of those. We've been working with them over the last couple years. We've met with them and kind of worked out a plan to get them into compliance but no. They can stay the way they are. Yeah. Unless we've met, I think a few people had some right-of-way acquisition but that's a whole separate negotiation but not part of this. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay, thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Councilwoman Ryan. Any other questions or comments? Councilman Campion: Not at this time. Mayor Laufenburger: Kate I noticed that there was one, one comment from a neighbor who suggested a different. I'm trying to think who it was. Kate Aanenson: A different land use recommendation? Mayor Laufenburger: Yes. Kate Aanenson: Yes, that was on Settlers West. It was on the Moon Valley site. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh. Kate Aanenson: They wanted it taken from medium density to low density. My point back to the Planning Commission, it's been that way for 20 years. Mayor Laufenburger: So it wasn't a property owner that was asking that? Kate Aanenson: No, it was a person, somebody else. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Alright. Kate Aanenson: If I may Mayor, the two people that are most interested in development, and we've talked about this before, is the people on both extremes. On the Gedney Pickle site and then also on the Moon Valley so they're the furthest away and they had really the biggest pieces and the most potential for redevelopment. Easy redevelopment. When I say easy the parcel sizes and that sort of thing so. Mayor Laufenburger: So both of those sites would be attractive for redevelopment. Kate Aanenson: That's what I meant to say, yes. Mayor Laufenburger: The problem, or the problem. Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 Kate Aanenson: Challenge yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: Or the challenge that needs to be overcome is delivery of municipal services to both of those properties correct. Kate Aanenson: Exactly. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah because they are, because they're on the two ends they're, they're farthest away from where that pipe would be delivered. Kate Aanenson: Right. And as we explained at the work session, you know you've got the Robert T. Anderson property so Eden Prairie can't service that. Mayor Laufenburger: Right. Kate Aanenson: And Chaska doesn't have the capacity so it's incumbent upon us whether or not we can provide it and that's what we demonstrated through this process is that we can provide municipal services down there. Mayor Laufenburger: And to your point the market will help determine correct. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Just remind Ms. Aanenson, the action that we take tonight is essentially to modify the existing Comprehensive Plan with these land uses and the modification to the percentages that are reflected in the plan, correct. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Laufenburger: And is it possible that the Metropolitan Council can come back and say why didn't you just wait until your next Comprehensive Plan? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, that's a good question. We did have the discussion with them. We're going under the old rules. The new rules are changing and we want to go underneath the old rules of making use. There's some other housing issues and some other things that just makes it more complicated. They're comfortable with this. They understand really what's driving this is an infrastructure improvement that was not anticipated. Mayor Laufenburger: Right. Kate Aanenson: Which sets us up to do a Comprehensive Plan amendment because we weren't anticipating this and to set ourselves in a good position to plan for our future so they understand that. 61 Chanhassen City Council — February 23, 2015 Mayor Laufenburger: The improvements to which you refer are principally the land bridge of 101. The Eden Prairie Highway 61, CSAH 61 which is being done in Hennepin County so those are, okay. Kate Aanenson: Exactly. I just want to make one other point. Mayor Laufenburger: We lost you. Kate Aanenson: I'm sorry, I'm back on. I just want to make one other point and I think we did hear from some of the residents that they're interested in some other opportunities to do trail connections in that area, which is something we talked a little bit about when we had our open houses. People see that as an opportunity, especially on that south side. Making some fantastic turnouts where you can actually look at the river so that's something as we look at planning with the next iteration of the Comprehensive Plan I think we'll look at those opportunities. Mayor Laufenburger: Does this action preclude us from doing that? Kate Aanenson: Absolutely not. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Good point. Alright. Any other comment or motion? Councilwoman Ryan: I'll make a motion. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilwoman Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: Chanhassen City Council adopts the resolution approving the land use map amendments within the CSAH 61 corridor subject to the approval by the Metropolitan Council. Mayor Laufenburger: We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilman Campion: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Campion. Any discussion? Resolution #2015-13: Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the Chanhassen City Council approves the Land Use Map Amendments within the CSAH 61 Corridor and the corresponding amendments to Figures 2-1 and 2-2 of the Land Use Element and subject to approval by the Metropolitan Council. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Laufenburgcr: Thank you very much Ms. Aanenson. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. 62 CSAH 61 Land Use Amendment CSAH 61 Corridor Citywide Land Use Existing ac. Change (ac.) Proposed ac. Percent Existing ac. Amended ac. Percent Agricultural 846.8273 -22.31 824.5173 65.6% 4,200 4,177.69 28.3% Office 158.6151 -58.15 100.4651 8.0% 335 276.85 1.9% Office -Industrial 81.9244 -40.05 41.8744 3.3% 883 842.95 5.7% Parks & Open Space 41.8188 10.71 52.5288 4.2% 1,391 1,401.71 9.5% Mixed Use 0 28.77 28.77 2.3% 115 143.77 1.0% Residential Large Lot 38.9997 -23.3141 15.6856 1.2% 971 947.69 6.4% Residential Low Density 20.3766 0.001 20.3776 1.6% 4,694 4,694.00 31.8% Residential Medium Density 0 89.75 89.75 7.1% 406 495.75 3.4% Residential High Density 67.2983 14.95 82.2483 6.5% 225 239.95 1.6% Commercial 0 0 0 0 328 328.00_1 2.2% Public/Semi-Public 0 0 0 0 19212 17212.00 8.2% Total 1,255.86 0.3569 1,256.22 100% 14,760 14,760 100% G:\PLAN\61 Corridor Study\61 land use existing and proposed.xls Ms. Tara Beard - Hennepin County. Housing, Community Works & Transit December 12, 2014 Page 2 City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use Map Amendments I acknowledge receipt of the above cited comprehensive plan update notification -^Y\ and waive further review/comment on the amendment. Sig \ p nDate itv rcl Printed Name Title RETURN THIS PAGE Hennepin County Public Works Strategic Planning and Resources Department David Jaeger Environmental Policy Manager 701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 700 Mail Code 606 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1842 612-348-5714, Cell: 612-396-2397 Fax: 612-348-8532 david.jaeger@hennepin.us is—a(4 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Aller: And this is not an off sale license. This is on premises, consumption. Mike Cohrs: Just on premises only, yep. Aller: Great, thank you. Any other questions? Great, thank you. Any additional individuals wishing to come forward to speak either for or against the item? Seeing no one come forward I'll close the public hearing. Open it up for comment. Do you feel discriminated against? Hokkanen: I'll make a motion. Aller: Guys drink wine too. Weick: I was going to say being a heavy wine drinker myself I take note. Aller: I think it's subject to all the rules and regulations that will be put upon them by the other ordinances and the licensing and so I think as long as they're going to be competitive and we want people to be competitive and they're serving alcohol already. Hokkanen: Right. Aller: It seems appropriate. Any other comments? Suggestions. Then I'll entertain a motion. Hokkanen: I'll move the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the ordinance amending Sections 20-258(7) of the Chanhassen City Code to permit the sale of wine on golf courses located within the Agricultural Estate District (A-2). Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Yusuf. Second. Aller: Having a motion and a second, any further discussion? Hearing none move to the vote. Hokkanen moved, Yusuf seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the ordinance amending Sections 20-258(7) of the Chanhassen City Code to permit the sale of wine on golf courses located within the Agricultural Estate District (A-2). All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: CSAH 61 CORRH)OR. PLANNING CASE 2015-06: AMENDMENTS TO 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, CHAPTER 2. LAND USE (LAND USE MAP AND FIGURES 2-1 AND 2-2). Generous: Thank you Chairman Aller, commissioners. The Planning Case 2015-06 is for land use amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission is holding the SCANNED Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 public hearing tonight. They act as a gate keeper for the City. One of their roles is to prepare and another is to amend the Comprehensive Plan. This is the Comprehensive Plan provides a vision for the community's development in the future. Land uses are just guides. The zoning of the property permits the actual use of the land, piece of land. It determines the permitted uses, the setback requirements, site coverage, height, all those things. Specific things for the development of the land but the land use provides a vision, what the community will look like. It's a general guide frame. The City did submit for jurisdictional review these land use amendments to the surrounding communities back in December. The 60 day review period ends on February 10. So far we only received a few comments and they're all supportive of the amendments. This property, the property within the 61 corridor is from the city limits on the east to the west side and the northern boundary of the corridor study area was, is the regional trail. Within this area there are approximately 1,455 gross acres of land. Of that the study, there's approximately 199 acres of developable land so there's a significant amount of reduction. Notices for this public hearing were sent to all the property owners who's lands are specifically being submitted, proposed for land use amendments and that was sent out on January 9'. We also sent notices to everyone who was previously noticed about the corridor study which is beyond our normal limits for amendments but we wanted to, we were directed by council to be as inclusive as possible within this project. The impetus for this was a County State Aid 61 corridor land use and utility study. This was a study undertaken by the City. We had, beginning last summer. There were two open houses that were involved in it. As part of the, the first open house the primary look was at the infrastructure improvements that are involved. The major one is the 101 river crossing which is being raised. It's one of the flood mitigation projects. It's being raised out of the 100 year flood elevation. The roadway will be widen to 4 lanes and a bike trail, bike/pedestrian trail will be included as a part of that improvement. The other one is County State Aid Highway and Carver County which is being improved for traffic flow and as part of that there will be two roundabouts provided. One at 101. At the end of 101 at 61 and the other one at Bluff Creek Drive. The City Engineer Paul Oehme is here if anyone has specific questions on that project. The other, County State Aid 61 is also being upgraded in Hennepin County up to Flying Cloud Drive. As part of that project they would improve traffic flow as well as putting portions of the 61 corridor above the 100 year flood elevation. Additionally as part of this study the City looked at extension of utility services down to serve the properties within the Minnesota River Valley. Again this is the study area corridor. It's from the eastern to the western city boundaries and it uses the rail, or the trail corridor as the north limits and the city's boundaries on the south side. As I stated there's approximately 199 developable acres within this corridor. The constraints on most of these properties are there's a significant bluff areas on the north end of many of the properties. There's wetlands including the Seminary Fen. The flood plain south of County State Aid 61 and Assumption Creek which runs east and west across the western portion of this property. Again the river crossing and County State Aid 61 project were one of the impetus for this. This will open up southern Chanhassen for transportation corridor and this becomes one of the gateways in the community. The City wanted to look at making this, how we can make this the best gateway that we can on the southern part of the city. Again the flood mitigation project, 4 lanes 101 across the river provides bike and pedestrian path and is above the 100 year flood elevation. The utility study as part of the corridor study was prepared by Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. It looked at the feasibility for extending sewer and water service down to the Minnesota River Valley. As part of that they looked at the capacity that would be needed based on the land uses and what the general, the trunk main infrastructure 4 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 improvements would be. The study did show that it would be feasible to extend sewer down into the river valley. Additionally as part of the water extension the City would look at providing a loop system so that if one side or the other was ever blocked for a while we would still have flow for emergency purposes and for potable drinking services. Again this looked as to be a feasible alternative and unfortunately this is turned sideways. North is to the right on this but it shows a realignment of 101 down to Minnesota River, into the Minnesota River Valley. The City did submit this and Carver County, in conjunction with Carver County are submitting this for federal funding to get the improvements going forward. If, at the earliest that this project could go forward would be in 2018 if we get federal funding. Otherwise as part of tumback dollars there aren't any available for the next 10 years so what this does is basically the south end would be moved over to where the roundabout would be as part of the County State Aid 61 improvement project. It would go just to the west of the existing, there's that dog kennel down in the river valley. Aanenson: Can I just clarify one thing too. Just to that 101 project is no way linked to the land use recommendations that we're making tonight. We're still going to go forward with the land use but their timing's are different. The City Engineer may talk about that in a little bit more detail but they're independent of each other, those decisions. Generous: Okay and then this is the actual land use amendments that we're looking at. The top map shows the current land use designation for the property. Oh I should point out that I provided 5 emails that were submitted after our reports went out. Four of the properties deal with the Moon Valley area. The property owner's preferences would be that this be designated for parks and open space use. However I wanted to point out that this as part of the previous Comprehensive Plan that was approved 10 years ago the land use was high density residential in this area so we're not proposing any specific changes for the Moon Valley area. They own additional land on the very west end and that's being included as part of these amendments. In reviewing the potential land uses within this area the City hired Hoisington-Koegler Group to do a parcel by parcel analysis of the land within there looking at the constraints. As part of the land use designation the City uses for residential medium density, densities of 4 to 8 units per net acre so we would take out any undevelopable land in determining the number of units that would be permitted. Again there's a difference between land use and zoning. Under the residential medium density you could use R-4 zoning would be consistent. R-8 zoning would be consistent. PUD-R would be consistent so it really depends on the specific project as to what the density, or what type of development would take place. At this point we're not looking at that specific idea. We have some general outlines of how it could develop but we're not going to control that now. We're just looking at the guiding of the land. And then finally the mixed use development, the City's using the idea that it would be a 70 percent residential and 30 percent commercial mix. We're looking at providing convenience access for residents in that area but again we don't have any specific development scenarios in mind and that would be in the future when the City would review that when development potential increases with sewer and water. We divided the amendments into 8 areas to make it easier to review. Map area 1 is the most westerly area that's being proposed for amendments and the north side of Flying Cloud Drive from the city boundary to approximately where the old Assumption Seminary used to be. Within this area there are 5 properties of which 3 are owned by the same firm, High Terrace and they, High Terrace did provide an email to note that they have questions about the Assumption Creek going through Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 their property. At present Assumption Creek is designated as a creek by the DNR and so we'd have to abide by their jurisdictional requirements. And on the very north end there are portions of the Seminary Fen. We are recommending approval of a land use amendment from office to residential medium density for this area. And then we did look at specifically, our preference for development would be that how the development would be maintained south of the creek corridor and that the north end would be preserved as permanent open space. However at this time there's no way to control that because we would need to wait for the development to actually come in and that's property owner driven. However there are advantages to compacting this development. They would have reduced infrastructure costs as part of their project and we'd have additional preservation of natural resources on the land by not having to grade on the hillier side of the property which could drain into Assumption Creek. Audience: Could you repeat that last board please? Generous: There are benefits to not developing north of Assumption Creek. They include reduced infrastructure cost and reduced environmental impacts to the property, specifically stormwater runoff and grading issues, erosion issues into the creek for development north of the creek. Additionally this land could be revegetated if you will and turn back into more native species so there are some positive benefits and they could recoup their development costs by transferring density from the north side of the land to the south side. Map area 2 is just to the north, northeast of the map area 1. This area is being proposed from land use amendment from office to parks and open space. Of the 5 properties within this area, 4 are owned by public entities. The City has one and then the DNR has 3 of them. There is one small piece on the immediate, on the east end of this area that is under private ownership but that is in a wetland area. This is where the Seminary Fen is located in the community and so it's meadow and swamp, shrub swamp wetlands within this area. Okay map area 3 consists of two properties. It's just north of the previous area. The amendment is from residential large lot to residential medium density. This property has wetlands on the western portion of the property. 25.03505000 is the PID number. Access would be off of Bluff Creek Drive. The second property is the old bed and breakfast site so really this area would make sense to, all of the areas would make sense to be developed in conjunction with each other. Again residential medium density is 4 to 8 units per acre so it's most likely some type of townhouse project but it could be something else under planned development. Map area 4 is on the east side of Bluff Creek Drive. It consists of two properties. The recommendation is to amend from office to residential medium density. This easterly property is actually connected under the same PID with this westerly piece. There is significant slope area throughout the middle of this property and on the north side of this land so development would be concentrated on the south end and potentially up in the north end of this property. The steep slopes are the significant feature on this site and there's potentially bluff in that area. Under city ordinances bluff are defined as having an elevation change of 25 feet or more and a slope of 30 percent or greater so it has to have both of those conditions and then there are setback requirements from the top and bottom of a bluff. This is, I put this in this location because it adds map area 4 which was the one we just reviewed and map area 5 which is to the east. It shows a concept development for this area where you'd have medium density on the west end below the bluff and then a mix of multi -family and commercial uses on the east end. Map area 5, which is, there we go. Next it consists of 3 properties. One is the garden center site. The other one is a small homestead which numerous out buildings and Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 then there's a little remnant piece up in the corner of this. This area is proposed for amendment from office to mixed use. It will really be different because as part of the 101 realignment on the north side the road would come, be pushed over to the east so these properties would actually be connected to the west side without this street in place. As we move to map area 6 this is on the east side of existing 101. It consists of 4 properties. The proposal is to amend from office industrial to mixed use. It consists of, there's a trailer site in here and some cabins. This little piece we found as part of this process is owned by the DNR and then this is the kennel and then the stable site. Again the realigned 101 will come close to this area into the roundabout which is down in the wye area. The next area is map area 7. It's to the east of the previous area. It consists of 8 properties and it's amended from office industrial to residential high density. I put this red line in to show there's approximately split because on, east of this line it's already guided for residential high density. West of this line it's guided for office industrial use. As part of the City's ongoing review of land uses it's been determined that we don't believe we have enough demand for all this industrial. Office and industrial land down here. However we do know that there's a demand for residential in the community and these are high amenity sites with, on the north end you have steep slopes and then to the south you look across in the Minnesota River Valley. Now the Moon Valley site, while it's not part of the development sort of provides an idea of how this area could develop. Would be a mix of housing types. In this instance we're looking at some high density residential apartments or condominiums with a street system in place. This is within, as part of the mining operation at Moon Valley they are creating approximately a 14 acre flat site in the bottom of the slope and then they have 2 '/2 to 1 slopes up to the north. Additionally on the south side of this property there is significant hills that would be preserved. As part of the 61 project they would be putting in retaining walls. Additionally as part of the 61 project there'd be a trail system that would connect to the City's 101 and the new river crossing. This is a general cross section of how that type of development would look. The bluff on the north side would be preserved. The flat area in the middle would be developed with a public street system or even a private street depending on the ultimate development and then preservation of the hilly area or bluff in the front of the property. This just shows immediately to the east of Moon Valley is the Richard T. Anderson Conservation Area in Eden Prairie. This was, we believe it was donated because of the steep slopes. There's probably bluffs in here and ravine system that was undevelopable so they did development on the top of the bluff and then this is all permanent open space. Aanenson: We put the last two slides in there because the letters that we received is why didn't the City do the same thing. It has been zoned as high density for quite a while. There was litigation with the Moon Valley site. They have been providing that 14 acre site to try to develop that. That's always been in their plans. The previous slide tried to show what you'd see on the top and we showed those at the neighborhood meetings too. Can you go back to the other slide quick? So you can see if you're at the top of Settlers West you're actually looking over the tops of those buildings for the height requirement and 3 stories so, these are a little bit different. You know the Eden Prairie because at the bluff ordinance that they may have unbuildablc then typically we've had those situations. Whether it's a wetland or like that they may dedicate that to the City. The open or count it towards their green space so this is a little bit different in the fact that we've already got it high density and we're not proposing to change. Nor would we recommend down zoning it. There was a question asked, why wouldn't the City buy the property and it has a lot of value. Someone would also have to go back and try to re-establish 7 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 those slopes. With the development proposal then you would get part of that reclamation. Re- grading the slopes. It's our understanding that once the 61 corridor study is, I mean the corridor is constructed then they should be pretty much done with their mining and working on the re- establishment of that reclamation plan and so any proposed development then would be waiting for sewer and water and then they would get the revegetation and get that property in a good stable working order. Generous: My computer's been slow all day. Map area 8 consists of 2 properties on the south side of Flying Cloud Drive east of the wye. The proposed amendment is from office industrial to parks and open space. Currently one of these properties has a auto dealership and the second property is a motel. Part of the reason for designating this is because this is right adjacent to the flood plain. There have been instances where this area floods out. We believe long term this would be a nice trail head for any people accessing the wildlife areas that surround these properties. Aanenson: Let me just comment too a little bit on that because we've been asked this question. Bob and I met with some of the property owners down there. There's uses down there that would remain the way they are. No one's intending to buy any properties at this time. They can continue to operate the way they are. They would just become non -conforming which some of them are already so as long as they continued to operate that way. Even if they change hands, someone was to buy them and operate them the same way, they would continue going that way in perpetuity. In the past some of the RGU area, there's a couple other fish and wild that has property down there, has acquired some of those properties along the corridor and so that's always a potential that the private property owner would work to have those acquired but it's not our intent to buy anybody out. They would just continue to operate the way they are and that would be for anybody else that we're recommending a land use change at this time too. Aller: So just to clarify that for anybody that's watching or in the room or for us, only if the use changes. Aanenson: That's correct. Aller: Is there an impact on a non -conforming use. They would be allowed to, for instance the motel would be allowed to operate as a motel for as long as it wants to be a motel and can remain viable for that owner. Aanenson: That's correct and continue to maintain their property and make changes that they need to. Aller: If they modify the use to some other use, they want to run a car dealership like the guy next door, that's a different use. Aanenson: Correct. Aller: Then there would be a problem with that use. Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Aanenson: That's correct. Alley: Okay. Weick: You could sell, the current owner could sell the property correct? Aanenson: Absolutely. Weick: And the new owner could continue to operate it as a motel. Aanenson: Absolutely, yeah. As long as it stays the way it is, yep. The use. It can change hands. Weick: Thank you. Alley: Thank you. Generous: Then the final area is map area 9. It's one property. It's the auto salvage yard on the west end of Flying Cloud Drive. On the south side of Flying Cloud Drive. Or the east end of Flying Cloud Drive, I'm sorry. The proposed amendment is from office industrial to parks and open space. Again for the same reason, this is surrounded by State and Federal wildlife land and we believe that long term this would be a good candidate for being incorporated as part of that. And then the Figure 2-1 of the, is a land use table in 5 year increments. We have to amend this because with the changes to the land use as the totals change by what the specific land use are there so we tracked this out to the 2030. Within the 2030 plan the assumption is full development. However with our update these numbers will be revised. However we will use the total numbers that we have established. And then Figure 2.2 just shows what the cumulative land use of each of the various land uses within the community are. Again this is based on approving the amendments that were proposed as part of the County Road 61 corridor study. And then finally staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend approval of these amendments to City Council. And with that I'd be happy to answer any questions. Aller: Great. Questions from anyone having read the packet? Weick: I do. Alley. Go ahead Commissioner Weick. Weick: Yeah, I have a couple actually. Could we go, to this one if we could. The before and after. I'm unclear on the Moon Valley. Could you point to, is that in 7? Map area 7. Generous: Moon Valley doesn't even show up on this. Weick: Got it, okay. Generous: It's this property here and it comes over slightly into this. L] Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Weick: Okay. Generous: This is that line that I, that red line that I showed for map area 7. It's the western edge of the existing high density residential. Weick: Right. Okay. Generous: Which yeah, it would correspond through this line here. Weick: Okay. Generous: Right. Then there is one other thing. An existing land use there's a little asterisk that's shown around the wye area. Aanenson: It's not on this. Generous: It's not on this map but it shows up and it's for some support commercial that the City envisioned would be appropriate down in this area but it didn't specify any specific properties that that would go on. It again would be development driven. The mixed use land use actually picks that idea up and the portions of the properties that are on either side of 101. Weick: And then the, you mentioned that the sewer and water is not related to the land use. Is it related to the 101? Aanenson: No I just wanted to say that we're going forward with those. We're not waiting for the road to come through. I think I'll let the City Engineer talk a little bit about, in order for this to develop, for those land uses to change sewer and water need to be provided and also 101 needs to be upgraded so we're working on those but I'll let the City Engineer maybe talk a little bit about. Aller: And before we turn to Paul we did have open houses on the issue of the water and land use as well. Aanenson: Yep. Yes. Aller: Because I remember attending them and they were pretty well attended by our residents which was great. Aanenson: Yep. Aller: So maybe you could address that as well while you go through your presentation. Oehme: So thank you commission members. In conjunction with this corridor study along 61 the city staff did review the feasibility of extending sewer and water along 61 there. The caveat is that 101 up the bluff to Pioneer Trail really needs to be upgraded before any of the utilities or 10 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 any potential urban development can take place down here. The 101 would serve as our main utility corridor. That's been planned in our comp plan for 20 years for that so we'll, we'd have to make those improvements prior to any really improvements on 61 so the City is studying the feasibility of improvements to 101 between Pioneer Trail and 61. We just kicked off a project a couple months ago with the County, Carver County and MnDOT as our partners. We're going to be having open houses on this corridor here in the near future. Sometime probably actually end of February we're going to have our first one and we hope to have an alignment, a chosen alignment picked by the end of the year. We are looking at you know several options for alignments to 101. The County, MnDOT have designed the 61 roundabout at the bottom of the bluff to accommodate the connection to 101 going up the bluff. You know obviously that hasn't been determined yet but it seems logical to tie into that point when 101 is improved so a lot of unknowns yet in terms of when that corridor is going to be reconstructed and improved but again I just wanted to reiterate that that, the 101 corridor really has to be improved before any of the improvements on 61 are taken care of. Aller: So this basically going through the same process we did with the original bridge and the corridor. We're having meetings. We looking at different options. Oehme: Yep. Aller: And then they'll be narrowed down by the feasibility studies that are performed. Oehme: Correct. You know we're going to have a lot of public input in the process as well too so, and just going through the normal process that the City does with, especially this is going to get an environmental assessment worksheet that we're going to be working through so there's a lot of steps that we have to follow to get that document approved. Aanenson: If I could add Paul, and you can follow up with what I say but Paul presented the options to the City Council discussing what he's going to do with this process but also the council did ask if, kind of what we did on 212. We provided some utility sleeves and some piping. It wouldn't obviously be available because there's no sewer and water there yet but, so you wouldn't have to go back and so we're trying to think ahead to prepare that. If you look at the sewer lines. The other thing that we talked about at the neighborhood meetings too is if the water were to come down Bluff Creek Drive. Now today those larger lots that are in the Hesse Farm area may not need that water but in 10-15-20 years so you know planning, thinking ahead. That provides a secondary access for those so those are some of the thoughts that we had so you can see the loop system. I don't know if you want to say anything else on that Paul. Oehme: Yeah so the goal is to always try to have a loop system for potable water for development purposes. For redundancy and for water pressure and several other reasons but so this is what's in our vision to service this area. Obviously we're still in the beginning stages of it as well. There's a lot of more study that has to be done with it but under the 61 corridor study we just wanted to get kind of a high level of what if and how much would it cost and is it even cost effective and feasible to bring utilities down to this corridor. Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Aanenson: And then if I could just add one other thing. The City's not planning a project. This is all development driven and there's things that happen, that need to happen north of this area. Some of those properties that are north of this area need to development to provide the municipal services, sewer and water as they work their way down so the City has no plans to say this property is going to develop tomorrow. What we're doing is providing the platform. Looking at those areas as people are coming across the bridge. Looking at those opportunities for land along the corridor to say we've got a plan in place. It may not happen today or tomorrow but we've got a longer term vision for that area to look at some of those uses that are down there. Oehme: And then one other point too. 101 between Pioneer Trail and 61 there's no funding available right now for construction so, and design work so we're, there's no tentative date for when that road would be improved so there's no, there's no plans for it so that's something that the City is going to just be monitoring with the County and MnDOT. Aller: Thank you. Questions? Great. With that I'll open up the public hearing. We have plenty of individuals here today so please take your time. State your name and address for the record. Come forward and let us know how you feel about the project, either for or against or make comments, that would be great. Anyone interested in coming forward? Welcome sir. Paul Beard: Thank you. My name is Paul Beard. I'm one of two property owners that are to the north of Moon Valley. Bob and Kate, I've got more questions and comments. Could you explain to a little bit higher degree of specificity relative to the amendment that you're referring to, how that impacts that. Aanenson: I'm not sure I understand your question. What your question is. Alley: I think the question is, is what is before us today, this amendment going to impact Moon Valley at all and if so how. Aanenson: Well the land use that is there today is what we're recommending not changing. So it's high density today. It's, we're recommending high density in the future so there's a 14 acre area that they've graded that we anticipate the building footprint would sit on so that wouldn't be any different than it was in the past. Paul Beard: Okay and who funds the sewer and water to come down? Aanenson: The developer. It's all development driven. Paul Beard: Okay so it will not be taxpayers? Generous: Property owners. Aanenson: Property owners yeah. Paul Beard: Okay so is that taxable then? 12 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Oehme: Did you want to address that Paul? Oehme: So the way the City extends utilities for these type of areas is the City funds typically the trunk oversizing cost for the pipes and sewers and what have you and then the lateral costs are assessed back to the benefiting property owners so the City typically, since there is multi - properties involved with this, it's typically a larger project that has to come forward. The City may take the lead on a project like that to extend it to this area so typically there's assessment costs for a majority of that utilities that would go in there. The City would typically pay for the trunk over sizing of the larger pipes that would go in there but that cost is offset by our utility rates for hook-up charges for new developments so typically it would go back to the benefiting property owners when the developer or the builder would come in and connect to our service. That's how we pay for the trunks. Aller: So what I'm hearing is that the City would almost act like a bank for purposes of financing the construction and then the tie in's for individual homeowners or the developer comes in and does a building and all the buildings that are tied in, he'll pay a fee and the City would recoup the money then. Oehme: Correct. The City would recoup the money for the trunk oversizing cost at that time. Aller: And that's pretty standard for all our developments? Oehme: Yeah this is the same model that we used for the 2005 MUSA area if you recall. Basically the City went and took the lead on extending the sewer and water in that area. Assessed a majority of the utilities and the infrastructure back to the benefiting property owners out there. Developers came in and developed that area and then we recouped those costs through assessments and then hook-up charges. Paul Beard: And you had mentioned, it was real brief, 2 %2 acres on the upper slope. So there's 14 acres developable at the bottom and then you said 2 '/z on the upward slope. Can you talk to that? Generous: No, 2.5 slope, degree of slope. It's 2 '/2 to 1. It's pretty steep up there. It's over 30 percent. Paul Beard: Yeah. Well that's where my house is. Generous: Yeah and that would be preserved as permanent open space. Paul Beard: Okay. And what, so this is new for me. Had I known this I wouldn't have bought the lot let alone build the house I built. With that said what is the City willing to do relative to the negative impact it will have on property owners such as myself and my neighbor over here. Aanenson: Sure. That, that was used as a rifle range when that subdivision went in so we cleaned it all up so I think it's moving in a positive direction. All that was in place. The Moon Valley site was there when you bought your house so. 13 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Paul Beard: So I grew up around here. Aanenson: And the mineral extraction has been operating out of that for a long, long time so that hasn't changed. Paul Beard: I zeroed in rifles there as a boy and the hill that you're referring to that you cleaned up, it's impossible. It's on the upward slope is where you'd fire your gun until, it's too steep to put anything, any form of a bulldozer or anything like that through it. Had there been environmental studies done? Aanenson: Yes. They've actually got, they did clean up, get all the lead out so, so. Aller: And I think what I'm hearing is and what I see this as is a guiding zoning, or guiding ordinance to allow for zoning or allow for someone to come in later on and develop and that developer would then have to clean up or work with the City to clean up to make sure that it's appropriate. The guidance that we're giving in that area in this particular instance I believe since we're upgrading for purposes of open space or down zoning from commercial to a property use that is beneficial to you and hopefully increase your property value. I'm not a soothsayer but I would hope that that's the general principle that I'm looking at. Paul Beard: Alright and as someone who is in real estate I would typically completely disagree with what you just said because you put high density residential housing in an area that's directly behind an area of pretty expensive homes and we pay a fair amount of tax dollars to the city and county as a result of that. It could have I mean in the hundreds of thousands and if it were any of your homes I think you'd look at this a lot different so thank you. Aller: Thank you. Yes, Commissioner Hokkanen. Hokkanen: Excuse me... Aanenson: It's pretty significant and also the distance. Hokkanen: Do we have a feet? Aanenson: Yeah. Generous: Well as part of the review. Hokkanen: I know it's in here somewhere. Generous: It's about a hundred foot elevation drop from the top to the bottom. Aanenson: Yeah so. Aller: My understanding is the drawing is fairly to scale. 14 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Aanenson: It is. Hokkanen: Yeah. Aanenson: Yes it is. Aller: And you're looking... Hokkanen: It's not directly behind. It's below. Aanenson: Correct. You're looking over the top of it. You know so if the building top at 35 feet, you've still got 50 feet. You're looking over the top of it so you wouldn't really see it and then all the landscaping so the separation between the house and the building itself is at least 100 feet also. Hokkanen: So it's not directly behind. It's below and behind. Aanenson: Correct. Hokkanen: Just want to clarify. Aller: Thank you. Sir. Dan Smith: Thank you. For the record Dan Smith, 1020 Hesse Farm Road. Aller: Welcome Mr. Smith. Dan Smith: Thank you. And I guess my questions are primarily on the impact to the water table and pumping and additional water demand should the City move to put city water down into that region and the potential impact on our water table and our well so can I get some understanding before I make another statement on the impact on the water table and the aquifer of putting in this kind of an extension on the City's water system. Oehme: Sure, commission members. Aller: Thank you Mr. Oehme. Oehme: So the, and I'm not sure how deep your well is. Our, the City's well is, are typically about 500 feet deep. They're in the Jordan Aquifer. The nearest well in this area is north of Lake Susan Drive. Is not even shown on this map here so north of Lake Susan Drive, off of Lake Drive. Most of our wells are north of Highway 5. Our future well fields are going to be up by Galpin and Highway 41 so not in anywhere in this area. Working with the DNR we are staying off, out of this area just because of potential impacts to the Seminary Fen so there are high capacity wells in this area. I know there's a couple in Chaska. I know the golf courses have 15 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 a couple of those so there might be some local draw down's because of those wells but in terms of impacts from city uses they would be negligible in this area. Dan Smith: Okay. A related question perhaps. There have certainly been rumors that the extension of utilities in the area, particularly water are to a great extent to support the needs of the pickle operation on the western end of the city. Can you give, shed any light on that? Oehme: Sure. So I mean the study that we embarked on with the 61 corridor study was to look at the feasibility of servicing the whole corridor. Not just Gedney Pickle so we looked at everything from the east border of Chanhassen to the west border so it wasn't specifically to service just one particular property owner or one particular business. It was to service the whole, entire corridor. Dan Smith: Okay. Thank you for the explanations. I would just suggest that for the City Council, you had stated that much of this plan was to an extent or to look at the new entrance into the city from the south. I might suggest that there are members of your population who look at this as an opportunity to preserve wild space and that the extensive development you're proposing would detract and so I would be disappointed if you move forward with the project as proposed. Aller: Thank you. Just for my clarification. There are no projects now running correct? As far as changing or developing any of these parcels. On any parcels. Aanenson: No. Aller: And is there, I mean technically other than the guidance of the ordinance is there any development that couldn't be done now? That would be done under these ordinances, if I'm stating that correctly. Is it, are these ordinances stopping anyone from developing? To a higher degree. To a higher level. Aanenson: Yes. Well I mean you have to have municipal services to go to a higher level of degree. That'd be one thing. There is, the BF zoning districts down there now that does allow some storage units and that sort of thing so I think part of the goal there is there's some uses that have conditional uses or they may have an interim use permit until such time a higher and better use comes along. That was intended. Some uses that, if there were municipal services would be higher degree of architecture. We pointed out one thing in the staff report but some of the vision also was to, you know also you have a different tax base when some of those went in there. Just a cold storage building as opposed to a nice office building with settings and I think, well I know we have a good standard of matching buildings into the settings. You know whether it's wetlands or slopes. How we minimize grading. Those sort of things so I think we do a good job and through this study and the meetings that we have with the individual property owners showing the three illustratives on those properties and how they could potentially be developed. Again we're not here to say what exactly is going to happen on those properties. We had requested that we would like senior housing. Well the market kind of looks at some of those things. We're just saying that this would be the density and this would be the appropriate use. When we did the Comprehensive Plan in 2008 we put a lot of office down there thinking that 16 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 that might be a good corporate steward. Thinking about, this is even before the Seminary Fen was purchased that we had this in place thinking that maybe an office building would be a good corporate steward of the property. They would have maybe preservation of some of their's and in looking at that really it was kind of like a holding so we weren't really sure what was going to happen or could we do something else down there so undertaking this study whether or not municipal services could be provided allowed for some other land uses that would also be a smaller footprint. More flexibility when you look at housing as opposed to a big office, industrial type use and as Bob indicated we do have quite a bit of that already so that was some of the factors that went into that. Aller: Okay thank you because I noted from the report and the study it seemed as though we really narrowly defined what was buildable area here to protect and preserve as much of the fen and as much of the Rice Creek area and the watersheds as we could. So that I thought was a really good analysis. Aanenson: Right. The map that we're showing there right now is the buildable area. We narrowed that down and we're very specific on taking out those slopes and those, that was part of the study too. To look at that to say you know, if we take out the, be clear and transparent on what's buildable on there to show that. You know there's a lot of acreage that's unused because of the sensitivity. Aller: Thank you. Any other individuals wishing to come forward, speak either for or against. Thank you. Come on up and state your name and address for the record. Stephanie Walsh: Hi, I'm Stephanie Walsh and I would be against the proposed development and I have some clarifying questions for you. Aller: Okay and did we get a letter from you as well? Stephanie Walsh: Pardon? Aller: Did we get a letter from you as well? Stephanie Walsh: You got a letter from me, yes. Aller: Okay, so that is part of the record so you know we did get it. Stephanie Walsh: Yep, 10165 Trails End Road. I'm the property north of Moon Valley. I'm one of the neighbors of Paul who already spoke. Also just reiterating everything that Paul said. That it would decrease my property values considerably. My other questions are, I keep hearing about the funding on Highway 101 and it's sort of a big question mark and we're not getting the funding right now and there's other sources and then there's funding that's not available for 10 years. Am I understanding that correctly and then I read in the, one of the plans that if the funding wasn't secured or wasn't possible then the zoning of Moon Valley would go back to residential and use it's own sewer and water. Do I have that, am I understanding that or can you add some more clarification to the process. 17 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Aanenson: If in the future sewer and water never got down there, we'd look at something else but we believe it's going to be. You know our Comprehensive Plan for the next iteration goes out to 2040. The plan we're working under right now is the 2030 plan so the environmental assessment that Paul, the City Engineer was just talking about was getting the environmental documents in place so we are in alignment for funding. If you look at the, what was done north between Pioneer Trail and Lyman, that section was just rebuilt and they did the same thing. They put the environmental documents together and were able to secure funding for that corridor. You have a lot of trips that are coming up over the river and now cannot go north and if you look at the rest of the city and the potential growth, we talked about the lifestyle center. Some of the regional commercial. There's a demand to go up that. There's a lot of accidents on that segment of road so that is a priority to get the funding for that. Stephanie Walsh: Okay. So the next opportunity for looking at any changes would be with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan? Aanenson: Well this is the change right now we're proposing now in the 20, we'll be starting the next Comprehensive Plan update and be submitted in 2018. Generous: 2018. Aller: 2018. Aanenson: 2018. We'll be having hearings before that to review that but part of this is as the road gets opened up there's going to be a lot of speculation on people trying to come in and have individual parcels and it's always better to have, look at it as a whole as opposed to individual people trying to come in and make minor changes which could happen. The council saw that as looking at it cohesively. Again the Moon Valley site has been guided high density and we're not recommending changing that at this time. Stephanie Walsh: The one thing that I do find encouraging is on your map is when you did your first Comprehensive Plan, the western side you had planned for a lot more opportunities of office and you've kind of pulled that back so I'm encouraged that actually it's a guide and there are changes that are happening. I would like to cross my fingers and have you relook at the zoning of Moon Valley. Looking at a 3 story apartment and I think in your graphic on slide 7, if you can go to that. You have, yep. Go back one if you would. You have 4 pretty massive buildings right there and I was just looking around today when I was driving around kind of going what does a 3 story apartment building look like from an elevation standpoint and I was actually pointing out to one of my neighbors, I'm like that's exactly what would be there. They are huge in elevation so I will be seeing that and I know, I had a conversation with you on the phone because I was also concerned about, we have the trail system. We have the Richard T. Anderson trail system. We already have informal trails that have been off of that so we have you know foot traffic going through to the Settlers West development and you had said that there was no plans on connecting those trails and then today by other comments I heard there were plans on connecting those trails. 18 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Aanenson: You asked, I think your question was would we be connecting you, this neighborhood to that, to the north. There could be a connection to the trail going, the Hennepin County trail there. Sure, I think we would look at something like that. Stephanie Walsh: Yeah, and then that comes to the right, that comes straight to our development so as far as foot traffic like up to 400 units. 800 to 1,000 people I'm just guessing. Rough math and that is a pretty relatively small area. You know I look out my house and so to look at the impact, that would be a huge impact to not only my house, to our development and so my other question of process is, I know that this is a fluid process but what would it take from a community standpoint to amend it? Can I propose an amendment? Can I petition with my neighbors? I know a lot of people, we had the open houses but there are so many moving parts with these projects of 61, 101. People are getting the little postcard and they have no idea what it, you can't even see the graphic on what it means or what... Aanenson: Yeah, that's why we always invite people to call, which you have and we've been working on this since, well all summer. I think we had the first open house in the spring so, you certainly can recommend to the Planning Commission that you don't support the change and they'll make a recommendation to City Council. Ultimately it's the City Council that would support that. Whether it be an office park. If it's 3 or 4 stories which an office park could be also so it's 14 acres so I'm trying to compare an office park. That'd be something like what CSM might have on the western edge of the city or you know we've got other office parks that size so. Stephanie Walsh: So do we have the opportunity to propose an amendment? Aanenson: You can always ask the Planning Commission, yep. Stephanie Walsh: Alright, okay. I'd like to propose an amendment. Can I do that and what would I have to do? Generous: That's what you're doing now. Aanenson: Yeah, just tell them that you don't support that and ask that they change it, yeah. Stephanie Walsh: Okay, yep. I would propose that it be changed to, at a minimum low density residential. You had another scenario that you had with the senior center where you showed one massive building surrounded by villas or townhouses. Generous: That was part of the corridor study. Stephanie Walsh: Yeah, and you know at the worst of any evils that would be less of an impact than 3 to 4 humongous apartment buildings in an area that is, you know we have eagles you know feeding. Deer running everywhere. It's next to a nature preserve. It's just going to, it seems like an odd addition. 10 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Aanenson: Yeah, well I guess what we look at it as a mining operation today so there is mining going on today. An active construction field so we looked at it as, you know again these plans are illustrative. No one's come forward with that specific plan. We don't know if a plan would look, how a plan will look because we don't know what the market's going to be like in 5 years. We don't know what the market's going to be like in 10 years, if this was the one that comes in so we just try to show that really for illustrative purposes. Again, and maybe Paul you could talk about what the dimensions. There's a big retaining wall in front of the Moon Valley site. That road's being lifted a couple of feet and how tall is the retaining wall in front of the Moon valley site? Oehme: Approximately 12 feet. Aanenson: 12 feet. And then you know on the top, yes you will see it but you're over, you know you're looking over the top of it no matter what would be there so I guess if you wanted to look at a comparison you could probably look at Power Ridge Apartments when you're driving by those on Powers Boulevard. Those are 3 buildings that are of the same scale. Stephanie Walsh: Okay, alright. And the other thing I just wanted to say is, the point was, I really don't feel like our development has been well represented because nobody is really, I asked some of the neighbors about the postcards. Did you get the postcard in the mail and they're like, what was that and they don't take the time to call and so they're not aware of what's going on and if, if there was a better notification system I think you'd have more people from our development here today so those are my final comments and I propose it's amended to a lesser low density. Aller: Great, thank you. Stephanie Walsh: Thanks. Aller: Appreciate your comments. Any other individuals wishing to come forward? Yes sir. Randy Barto: I do. How you doing? Aller: Your name and address for the record. Randy Barto: Randy Barto, 400 Lakota Lane. I grew up there. I just, it's my first time at a council meeting so this is interesting how this works but I grew up overlooking the bluffs. I looked down at Moon Valley and the pit all my life. Roamed the hills. I know the area like the back of hand. Night time take you anywhere. Noticed you guys the mining, he made some comments. I don't understand this bluff. You said 25 feet or more, 30 percent grade. Is that something that can't be touched or how does that go with the City I guess? What are your rules on that because you said they're mining. They're basically taking out the, all the minerals in the hills. They're taking them right out and then you'll come in afterwards. Recoup the area and then build on it. Aanenson: Re-establish, no. 20 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Generous: Well they will re-establish that slope and revegetated it to hold it from erosion purposes. Randy Barto: Yeah. Generous: The slope that was approved as part of their mining operation was a 2 `h to 1 slope so it's over 30 percent. Randy Barto: Yep. Yep. No I have video of it. I know. I've cut trees up there and I watched the dozer go around and I sell equipment. I understand, yep. Generous: And so the City's ordinance for bluff protection requires that if you meet the bluff definition you have to maintain a setback from that and you cannot alter the bluff. Randy Barto: Sure, sure. You made another comment on this project. I think it's down over by the, I think Skip Cook owns the property I believe but there's a, or maybe Hesse does on the farm area and you said there was a bluff area. That's actually not a bluff. That would be the railroad bed that was put in by the railroad is what you're looking on the steep slope side so it's technically they dug into the hill and put a railroad through there. Richard T. Anderson. Great points. Never met you Paul, right Beard. Yeah, Gary Llano's my boss. He knows you I think, yep. Dad's and daughters or something like that but he's got a great point. Actually that property was owned by the Peterson's. Daryl Peterson. Cookie was his name. I hunted that property. I grew up. I shot deer in your back yard. Actually probably in your driveway. I used to kill 5-6 deer a year. You know we had a license to do this. Beautiful area. Know it very well. Know the creek beds. Know everything about it. I know the bluff below my hill goes back. I know everything about that. I know Paul Tautens. I know everything that goes on. I think the point that these people, especially when they built their homes, I didn't see any homes. You guys came in and built beautiful homes overlooking the valley. Hopefully it was your years and years to come planned and the whole thing is, is they just want, they don't want. You know we're not looking to have a city below this beautiful you know the last of the last bluff. You know I mean this is what they moved there for. They put their lives into it. It's gorgeous. My dad's property, our property that's in our trust for us kids, anyone I can take up there, put them right in the center and they can look out. You can't replicate it. But if you put properties like you're talking about down below, you'll stare right into the heart of them. I can tell you that right now. When the vegetation comes off the trees, you look right down to the river bottom. You know it's very, very, very you know surreal when it's like it is. I also said the Richard T. Anderson was not donated by no means. Daryl Peterson acquired a large sum of money from the City of Eden Prairie. They bought it from him so you might want to dig into that a little bit more. That was not a donation. Aanenson: Yeah but if it's unbuildable over a certain slope there's a different cost for that as opposed to a 14 acres that's buildable. That's my point. 21 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Randy Barto: Yeah but they have, go look at Welsh's home which is another relative of the Llano's. His house is dug into the hill. I think all that land that is in there very well could have been buildable. Aanenson: Yeah and some cities give variances for slopes and sometimes compensation. If somebody does a tax consequence for that sort of thing. There's all different ways to do that sort of thing but we're just saying that the people that own that property, since we've given it, since they've met with us at the Comprehensive Plan it's always been shown to be developable. We went through court litigation years ago to, for them to validate what they wanted to build on it. Put a plan in place and that was all ordered through the court process. Randy Barto: And Moon Valley was sold I think you said when the process when the Moon Valley was sold it was 10 years ago, correct? Is that what you guys approved the high density? Generous: No it was in place. Aanenson: It was in place then. Randy Barto: In place then. Aanenson: Yeah the Zwiers family owns, still owns it and they're the ones that requested the high density on that one. I don't recall what it was before that but it was in 2008 it was high density back then. It was high density when Settlers West came in so that hadn't changed. Randy Barto: What are they mining out of there, just curious. Aanenson: Gravel. Oehme: Sand and gravel. Randy Barto: Just sand and gravel? And they're allowed to take complete hillsides out with mining operations? Oehme: Well the permit. Aanenson: They have a permit that they have to follow the grading limits, correct. Oehme: Right. Randy Barto: Okay. That's all I got. Aller: Great, thank you very much. Randy Barto: Thanks guys. PX Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Aller: Any other individual wishing to come forward, speaking for or against or making a general comment? Alright, we're closing the public hearing. Open it for discussion. Hokkanen: I want to clarify that these are renderings and this is not a development that's being proposed. I feel like we are missing that point with the public. I mean because is not changing that zoning. That Settlers West when they bought their homes, this is what it was zoned for correct? Aller: That's my understanding. Hokkanen: I just want to make sure. Aanenson: Guided for, yes. Right. Hokkanen: So it's not changing the zoning. This, what we're doing tonight. Aller: Correct. Hokkanen: And those buildings aren't getting, we're not approving those buildings. Those are just renderings of what may or may not, like other developments that have come forward with. Aller: Correct and I look at that as a benefit to someone who wants to do a development because it's kind of already been done for them so they can see that this potentially would work and get... Hokkanen: But it could be senior housing too. Aller: Could be senior housing and it can be less than when you were guiding it 4 to 8. It can be 4 units or 8 units. When it's high density some of it's not unusual, well it would be unusual for somebody to come in and do it but if they wanted to they could come in with a low density project and just not use the high density. Hokkanen: Correct. Aanenson: If I may Mr. Chair, just to remind everybody. I think Commissioner Hokkanen's on a good point and that's that there's certain things that need to happen before this would. Development needs to happen above. We talked about Bluff Creek Golf Course or that's kind of a key piece for that to be developed. We have no idea what the timeframe is. Funding needs to be secured for 101. In addition a developer needs to come forward. Any development in any one of these parcels requires a public hearing so each parcel as it develops would come back to this group for a public hearing and then to the City Council for a hearing so there's still another review cycle. Again whether the recommendations you make tonight or the neighbors, those get forwarded to the City Council and then when we do the Comprehensive Plan again in, starting which we submit in 2018, that would be an opportunity to comment again on the land uses. Weick: But we've been asked to recommend. 23 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Aller: To include that... Weick: To the City Council that the un-numbered areas here on the map. Aanenson: That's correct. Weick: Be changed from high density. Aanenson: That's correct. Weick: Okay. Aller: Okay. And there's really nothing to stop someone from coming in and requesting a PUD on any of these parcels. Aanenson: Correct. Alley: And creating something wholly unique based on the parcel Hokkanen: They can request it. Aller: And come in before us and saying this is what we want to do and our expectations would be of a higher grade project because of that. Weick: Well considering that area you know separately when you look at the proposed land use amendment I am very encouraged to see it move from predominantly office and office/industrial, in that area to a mix of low, medium and high density as well as you know some small commercial. I think the, that direction is definitely where we would want to go as a city with something that is potentially a gateway project to the city and so I, I am personally encouraged by the direction away from office/industrial in most of those areas. Hokkanen: I would agree. When and if everything else falls into place. Weick: Right. Aller: Welland that's, and that's the way I view this. I view this as an active encouragement to developers in the future as they come into the new gateway to look at what's there and if they just see it zoned for completely high density. High commercial then that's what they're going to think is a major downtown port as opposed to Chanhassen which is a diverse, open space, park minded community and by doing the studies, I think we were, we're turning the guidance to more park and open space. We're protecting a lot more of the wetlands than we recently had and I think that's a positive move as well. So for that reason I would be voting to move this forward and I would like to add the recommendation that they do take a look at Moon Valley for purposes of future use. My recommendation would be for the 2018, does anybody feel differently? Maybe for the future plan because I think this is going to be a long way out. 24 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Hokkanen: Right. Aller: And they can take their time and as we do these studies they can develop more information on where they want to guide that eastern portion, if that makes sense. Weick: Everybody looks at the land uses differently right. When I saw high density I immediately went to you know senior, senior living in my head and some of the projects that we've seen and that's why I was kind of excited about it because I think that's an area that we, especially looking into the future that we lack in Chanhassen and so I didn't even think of you know some of the other. That's right where my mind went, myself so yeah I think there are high density uses that are you know very much in line with things that the City needs in the future. Maybe not in the next 5 years but maybe in the next 10 years so. Hokkanen: And I think the city as a whole has done a good job with conservation of land and open space and park space and it's part of what makes Chanhassen you know one of the best places to live in the country so I mean with that being said and going forward I think they'll keep that in mind with the Moon Valley. You know like saying south of Assumption Creek. You know taking that density over. You know stuff like that that we can do going forward. I know that's how I would like to see it go. Aller: Well and I, it's been commented about the trails and I think we have in the past and will continue to do so but if it needs to be said or added then maybe the recommendation, as these projects come forward I think it's the nature thing that the City of Chanhassen has always looked to do is intertwine these communities and attach those trails so that we have the best trail system as well. Any further discussion or comments? Entertain a motion. Yusuf: I was just going to say one thing. Kate you did mention that any project on any of these parcels will have to go through the hearing. Aanenson: Correct. Yusuf: I think it's important to just remind everyone of that too. Aanenson: Yep, yep. Yusuf: So they get a chance to review it. Aanenson: So if municipal services are provided down there then any change would have to come back for a public hearing, just as we did on the storage unit. The gentleman there. Remember we talked about that. Wanted to do additional storage unit and we also said keeping in mind that in the future municipal services may become available. You might want to site your buildings in such a way that coming off of 212 and the Chaska portion that those properties could be combined and provide some higher and better uses down there so again trying to plan forward but yes, those would all come back through. Each individual property would come back through for site plan approval. 25 Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Aller: And I would also encourage staff to continue in it's, it's practice basically of having those community meetings and open houses and I know that many people don't feel that the postcards are adequate but that's the means that we have to get it out there so I'm encouraged by the fact that all these individuals are here in the audience. I think we do our best work when the citizens come forward and give their opinions so that people can hear what's out there. What's going on and as a neighbor if you get one of those postcards, if you're listening out there or watching on TV please knock on your neighbor's door and talk to them about how they feel about it and if you can bring them down, bring them down. We'd love to hear from each and every one of you in making these decisions which impact all of us. Hokkanen: Well we do appreciate the time you take to come out and we do listen and we read the letters and take all your opinions into consideration for, as we go forward. Aller: Entertain a motion. I can't make the one. Hokkanen: I already did. Weick: I can do a motion. Do we need to? Aller: Commissioner Weick. You can add as it goes. Weick: What's that? Aanenson: It's on the screen. Weick: Okay but we don't have to mention anything about. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the land use map amendments within the CSAH 61 corridor and the corresponding amendments to Figures 2-1 and 2-2 of the land use element. Hokkanen: Second. Aller: With the additional recommendation? Weick: With the additional recommendation. Aller: So I have a motion by Commissioner Weick. Seconded by Commissioner Hokkanen. Any further discussion? Weick moved, Hokkanen seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the Land Use Map Amendments within the CSAH 61 Corridor and the corresponding amendments to Figures 2-1 and 2-2 of the Land Use Element with the recommendation to look at future uses for the Moon Valley site. Ail voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. FM Chanhassen Planning Commission — February 3, 2015 Aanenson: This item does go to the City Council. I think it will be on a work session and then if you can check the City's website, if you want to follow it up to the City Council. When it will be going forward. Aller: So this will be going to a work session followed by a formal hearing by the council. Please follow it for further action at the council. Aanenson: This is just a recommendation so. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Hokkanen noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated January 20, 2015 as presented. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Aanenson: I didn't have anything except for the tentative agenda. We do have the lifestyle center concept on for your next meeting so there'll be a lot of discussion there. Again notices are going out on that. Trying to get information in the paper about that. Again the regional significance, we talk about the impact of that. The March P one, that application did not come in so that one we may not have any items on for March P. That may get bumped down to March 17te. I know Maryam you will not be here. So we'll also do our, maybe on that meeting on March 17' do our interviews for Planning Commission candidates as long as we're all meeting so we'll try to do those interviews. And then so on the March 3nd right now I'm stating we probably won't have a meeting. Then on March 17' we have a variance on that and we may have the daycare site on then and then we'll kind of do a year end report. And then our April 70' is our typical work session meeting and then we'll have the introduction of the new commissioners and I know you're going to be gone in that meeting. Hokkanen: Yes. Aanenson: Okay. Just trying to make sure that we're juggling that, juggling that quorum. That's all I had Chair. Aller: Great. For those of you out in the audience or those watching at home, there is the application process for membership in any of the community's various commissions so please take a look at the different items and commissions that are out there. Whether it be Senior Commission, Planning Commission, Environmental Commission. There's plenty of work to be done and we appreciate all of the service of our fellow residents so please take a look at it. If you are not interested in doing it but know somebody that is, please have them interview and apply. Then I'll entertain a motion to adjourn. Yusuf moved, Weick seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim 27 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for Amendments to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 2 — Land Use Land Use Map and ,' ures 2-1 and 2-2 Applicant: City of Chanhassen Property CSAH 61 Corridor Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the • applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood abOLt this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-06. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at benerous()ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure. • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 foot of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hosing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to oommerciaUndustrial. • Minnesota Stale Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any Person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. Ifyou wish to have Wmethino to be included in the mporL please contact the Planning Stag person named on the notification. SCANNED o m N LL] . m � �QO �! N n � i m O el L,V N O a O 0 0 � I� 'O w rN• C N E iA m r_ o \s ek op 0 --- 9 N LO O m Y co ul LU M W U 2 LL Z LL LL � J Y my LO Q SOU l S-bco Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for Amendments to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 2 — Land Use Land Use Map and Figures 2-1 and 2-2 Applicant: City of Chanhassen Property CSAH 61 Corridor Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following stepF,, at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-06. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at bcenerous(fti.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Und Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested parry is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or party the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciaVindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any Person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersontrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. if you wish to have Something to be included in the report, please contact the Plannina Staff person named on the notification. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 02 1 P $ 000.41P 0003195036 JAN 232015 MAILED FROM#4E 55 317 FFB ��'�e�1 °pry occy ?pis �v�yAssFN NIXIE 553 7E 1009 0001/28/15 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD LONNIE FORD 450 FLYING CLOUD DR �7�� NC'HASKA, MN 55318-9533�jC _ J uL�tc/L0..1 �,N� ^Lgdi 4;L Marc�Ue� Am n11111rr.,rilr,lrr, r,il„Ir,III „i ,1 i I u 1111111 u Ir Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for Amendments to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 2 — Land Use Land Use Map and Figures 2-1 and 2-2 -Applicant: City of Chanhassen Property CSAH 61 Corridor Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-06. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at baenerousbci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. eview Procedure: • " ivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, lteYonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallindustnal. • Minnesota state Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the Project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. H you wish to have somethin to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. {I1.T.{�{h{ {'f3{3`..i 141141 54 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us �p�jE 02 IP•Y'�f'LV0.40-"`�I 0003195036 JAN 23 2015 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55 317 f9wiltED JAN 2 8 2015 CITYOFCIyp7VHASS&V X 5 5 R N 7 F 5 FORWARD TTNIE EXP RTN TO SEND MEYER "3 N=DLE CALYAR RD DECORAH IA 52101-7526 RETURN TO SENDER WILLIAM H MEYER 1680 WEST FARM RD CHASKA, MN 56318-9607 i s---66 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date: Time: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for Amendments to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 2 — Land Use Land Use Map and Figures 2-1 and 2-2 Applicant: City of Chanhassen Property CSAH 61 Corridor Location: A A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. pufpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the uest and to obtain input from the neighborhood ap�li�tii►i about this project. During the meeting, tV Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following ste w. at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project.` 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed"and the Commission diseu5ses' the project. If you want to see the plans beforefthemeeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-06. If yer-ii h to talk sorrdritllfivksf ttUN.Rf91 !Pse conts2i 90 C3e�e Questions: email at bgenerous(cDci.chanhassen.mll Comments: 952-22 1 o tq ubm` havvee�on op helpful to to ed�pa meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Com The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to aftend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialiindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any Person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person (a). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the nofificabon. % CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us y�PtFS Posj in � PIYNEY BOWS• 02 1 P $ 000.480 0003195036 JAN 23 2015 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55317 FF9Fc��F �,� I 0 U,c NIXIE S53 PE 1009 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD BC 55317014747 * _ _ IIIIIEns!lihillfill l,sfafeI�ii°�'fl�f�ffl(i311,111*1I46 LAVONNE S DALLMAN PO"13DW218—' 5 ��s �ly�„ LI�LLd Dy 53t B ii�III L111,11I1'II' I I.11I1,1pIImILIyIIIIIIllIs) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 3, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to review amendments to Chapter 2 - Land Use of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan in relation to the CSAH 61 Corridor Study. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan can be viewed on the City'E web site at www.ci.chanhamen. mn.us/compplan. It is also available for review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions. Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Email: bgenerous@ ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, January 99 2015' No 4076) Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. / (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. n -2b was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghUklmnopgtstuv/,/w�x/yz/n'a � /� Q LaurieA. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this c r 2 y of 2015 lic E 6ARKoim iESO'AS 01r31i:6 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.59 per column inch SCANNED To: Chanhassen Planning Commission Re: 2/3/15 Hearing on County Road 61 Corridor Comprehensive Plan Amendments I and my brothers and sisters are members of High Terraced LLC, which owns much of the property in Map Area 1 of the staff report. This property is sometimes referred to as the Seminary Property, and originally included the Seminary fen area now owned by the DNR. We sold that portion to the DNR in 2008. We support the proposed amendment regarding our property, but want to provide some additional background about Assumption Creek, which seems to be the subject of widespread myths. Assumption Creek nominally runs through west -to -east through the center of our property. I say "nominally" because in this area it normally does not run at all: 1. This section of Assumption Creek, which leads up to the Seminary Dam, is largely dry except immediately after heavy rains. It is not a "creek" at all, but rather a storm drain. 2. Obviously, this section has no trout, and no possibility of having trout. 3. The official designation of this section of the creek as a "trout stream' is based on the fact that the creek did have trout (and water) over twenty years ago. 4. In 2008, when we sold to the DNR, we toured this portion of the creek with several DNR representatives, to convince them that the portion of the creek "upstream" of the Seminary Dam is not in fact a trout stream. While I can't speak for the DNR, I believe the lack of water was persuasive. 5. It is our intention to seek declassification of the dry area at the appropriate time. We were advised by the DNR that it would be best to do so at the time of proposed development. That is our plan. Assumption Creek at the Seminary Dam At end of wettest June in Minnesota history Sam Wetterlin Generous, Bob From: Paul Beard ] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 3:30 PM To: Generous, Bob; Aanenson, Kate Subject: Zoning of Moon Valley Bob and Kate, It is my understanding that the two of you are part of the planning commission relative to the future potential development of the legacy Moon Valley Gun Club. Bob, as you may recall, we spoke last February 23`" in regards to the future development plans of the property as it falls directly behind my home (10160 Trails End Road). During our conversation last winter, you had mentioned that the city had undertaken a study at that time to determine the feasibility of getting utility services to the property. At that time, there were no urban services available for the property and without urban services, it would require the developer to provide well and septic and that eats up a bunch of land. At the time, Sewer for this area was located on Lyman Blvd & 101 and as I recall, the city would need to put in a lift station at 212 & Powers Blvd as well as at the top of the hill on 101 as a starting point of getting sewer and water there. The sewer line would need to go through the Bluff Creek golf as well. Ultimately, the development company would need to pay for all of this and it isn't cheap. This begs the question of why go to so much trouble to develop a piece of land that should be left alone in its natural state. Looking back, had I known at the time of the cities interest and/or plans of future proposed development of this land, I would have never bought the lot in 2009, let alone built our dream home on it in 2010. If the city is going to approve the land for development of any type, I feel that both they and the future developer need to have some skin in the game where property owners like I am concerned based upon the direct negative impact said development would have on the value of our property when it came to resell time. Ideally, I would like to see the City acquire the land and leave it alone similar to what the DNR has chosen to do with the property on the other side of the old Highway 212 from this property. The Richard T. Anderson park and trail system is one of the few areas left in the surrounding area that hasn't been developed and I'd like to see this parcel of land be turned into a natural prairie grass field. While many people in the development and planning office may only consider the potential positive financial impact that development could have on the City, I think it is prudent to also take into consideration what said development could and most likely will have on the property value of adjacent property owners. If development is inevitable, than 1 would ask for low density (such as for a senior living community) and only have the option of development at the bottom of the hill and to the far west border so it can't be seen by our home. It is my understanding that the Planning Commission is holding a public hearing tomorrow night in regards to suggested zoning proposals for the property. I will attend the meeting but wanted to share some thoughts with the two of you and whomever else applicable in advance of this meeting. Thank you. Paul W. Beard, CPC I Partner SkyWater Search Partners Direct: NOWMgar Mamma Abm SKYWATER TO � BTO Y Carlson Towers 1601 Carlson Parkway, Suite 150 1 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55305 Check out SWS on: Web Linkedin Facebook Twitter Ranked as the #1 small company to work for in the State of Minnesota (Minnesota Business) - 2014 Generous, Bob From: Steph Walsh [ Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 2:05 PM To: Aanenson, Kate, Generous, Bob Subject: Feb 3rd Planning Commission Public Hearing Re: Written Comments on Moon Valley Zoning To: Bob Generous and Kate Aanenson, Planning Commission Re: Feb 3, 2015 Planning Commission Public Hearing regarding zoning of Moon Valley Gravel Pit. Thank you for the notification on the project. I am a neighboring Chanhassen property owner next to Moon Valley,I�Trails End Road (PID 25.7560270). 1 am one of the homes sitting on the bluff as part of the Settlers West development facing Moon Valley that will be impacted with the high density zoning. I plan on attending the meeting but wanted to submit my written comments on the future land use of Moon Valley. I would love to see Moon Valley continue with green space as a continuation of the Richard T. Anderson Park and trail system. Across the road is preserved land, duck hunters hunt on the lake. I am not sure how that is going to work with hunting and high density residential from a safety perspective, next to each other. I also feel that keeping this property fitting in with it's natural surroundings would be the less expensive and a natural choice for the property. In the Revised Comprehensive Plan it indicates that green space planning is relatively unchanged compared to growth and development- creating a bigger green space gap. Although this could be a beautiful setting, the majority of this property is unbuildable due to the steep slopes making it a difficult acquisition for any developer. My second choice if this is not feasible would be to make it low density residential, which would have less of an environmental impact on the natural setting surrounding the parcel and less disruptive to neighboring property owners and the Richard T. Anderson Park. Lastly, if I had to live with high density residential, there is only one scenario that I would support and that would be if it became senior housing, which is one of the scenarios in the revised plans. I know from first hand experience that Chanhassen is lacking in reputable senior housing and care options more specifically a full continuum of care for seniors- a campus with all service levels from nursing home to independent living. Due to this gap in Chanhassen, I had to move my father to Masonic Homes that has a full continuum of senior care and housing and drive to Bloomington daily for roughtly two years because they have a full campus offering of services for an individual that is up and down from a nursing home to assisted living to senior independent housing and back again. This scenario is also not that uncommon as I talked to others that have physically moved their parents from different levels of care and different towns multiple times in a year while they are in failing health Baby boomers are aging and I would love to see Chanhassen City Planning ahead of the curve in addressing this future housing and senior citizen care need. I look forward to hearing more about this at the meeting, but wanted to share my viewpoint on the future zoning of Moon Valley since high density zoning of this property will more than likely impact our views, noise, foot traffic, the environment and otentially our home value as an immediate neighbor to the development. I can be reached at to discuss further and thank you in advance for the opportunity to submit a written comment on this development to the Planning Commission. Warm Regards, Stephanie Walsh PID 25.7560270 ", V Generous, Bob From: Aanenson, Kate Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 9:16 AM To: Generous, Bob Subject: FW: Feb 3rd, Planning Commission Mtg - Input Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: Todd M Nickell lmailto:T�] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 9:00 AM To: Aanenson, Kate Subject: Feb 3rd, Planning Commission Mtg - Input Kate - First off, thanks for your service to our great community. I'm unable to attend the planning commission meeting on Tuesday, February 3rd, but wanted to provide my input as a home owner on Trails End Road (9872 Trails End Road). As it pertains to the development of the existing Moon Valley property, I'd really like to see the space designated as green space and tied into the existing Richard T Anderson Conservation area. We absolutely love the conservation area/bluffs above the river valley and this would be a great addition. Recognizing the challenges with designating this as a green space, an alternative would be a low density housing option, as I'm opposed to the current recommended high density proposal. As always, I'd be happy to discuss.... you can reach me on my mobile @ i Warm Regards, Todd Todd Nickell I Vice President, Finance and Treasurer Direct: I Cell: I MOMENOW Universal Hospital Services, Inc. 6625 West 78th St, Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55439 www.uhs.com Generous, Bob From: M Richard Walsh [ Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 9:50 PM To: Generous, Bob Subject: Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Bob, In advance of your planned meeting 2/3/15 regarding a change in 2030 Comprehensive Plan. My comments would be I would like the area of the Moon Valley Sand Pit to be considered for "green space" parkland and not industrial or high density residential. Mike Walsh CSAH 61 Land Use Amendment CSAH 61 Corridor Citywide Land Use Existing ac. Change ac. Proposed ac. Percent Existing ac. Amended ac. Percent Agricultural 846.8273 -22.31 824.5173 65.6% 4,200 45177.69 28.3% Office 158.6151 -58.15 100.4651 8.0% 335 276.85 1.9% Office -Industrial 81.9244 -40.05 41.8744 3.3% 883 842.95 5.7% Parks & Open Space 41.8188 10.71 52.5288 4.2%1 1,391 1,401.71 9.5% Mixed Use 0 28.77 28.77 2.3%1 115 143.77 1.0% Residential Large Lot 38.9997 -23.3141 15.6856 1.2%1 971 947.69 6.4% Residential Low Density 20.3766 0.001 20.3776 1.6% 4,694 4,694.00 31.8% Residential Medium Density 0 89.75 89.75 7.1% 406 495.75 3.4% Residential High Density 67.2983 14.95 82.2483 6.5% 225 239.95 1.6% Commercial 0 01 0 0 328 328.00 1 2.2% Public/Semi-Public 0 0 0 0 1,212 1,212.00 8.2% Total 1,255.86 0.3569 1,256.22 1 100%1 14,760 14,760 100% A G:\PLAN\61 Corridor Study\61 land use existing and proposed.xls lea Comprehensive Plan Amendment CSAH 61 TASK STATUS START DATE DUE DATE %COMPLETE DONE? NOTES 1 include all Chapters of Comp Plan, Determine Amendments: uses, infrastructure, housing In Progress 10/27/2014 11/21/2014 100% include housing plan? Joint CC & PC Meeting In Progress 10/27/2014 12/ 1/2014 75% 0 Prepare Maps and amendment narrative In Progress 10/27/2014 12/ 12/2014 0% Submit for Jurisdictional Review In Progress 12/2/2014 12/ 17/2014 0% 0 Prepare letter and material Notify Metropolitan Council In Progress 12/2/2014 12/5/2015 0% 0 60 Days Land Area, Fig. 2-1 and 2-2, Analysis In Progress 10/27/2014 12/17/2015 00/6 0 Housing, Population, Employment, Traffic, Sewer and Water PC Staff Report Deferred 12/02/2014 01/23/2015 0% 0 Notices - Property Owners & Publication Not Started Ol / 15/2015 0% 0 Public Hearing PC Not Started 02/03/2015 0% 0 Hearing CC Not Started 02/23/2015 0% 0 Submittal Resolution Prepare Comp Plan Amendment Submittal Not Started 0% 0 Submit for Metropolitan Council Review Not Started 02/27/2015 0% O 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 Comwehensive Plan Amendment CSAH 61 TASK STATUS START DATE DUE DATE %COMPLETE DONE? NOTES C 11/21/2014 70% 0 include all Chapters of Comp Plan, Determine Amendments: uses, infrastructure, housing In Progress 10/27/2014 A� include housing plan? Joint CC & PC Meeting In Progress 10/27/2014 12/1/2014 0% 0 Prepare Maps and amendment narrative In Progress 10/27/2014 11/21/2014 0% Submit for Jurisdictional Review In Progress 12/2/2014 12/17/2014 0% 0 Prepare letter and material Notify Metropolitan Council In Progress 12/2/2014 12/5/2015 0% 0 60 Days Land Area, Fig. 2-1 and 2-2, Analysis In Progress 10/27/2014 12/17/2015 0% 0 Housing, Population, Employment, Traffic, Sewer and Water PC Staff Report Deferred 12/02/2014 01/23/2015 0% 0 Notices - Property Owners & Publication Not Started Ol / 15/2015 0% 0 Public Hearing PC Not Started 02/03/2015 0% 0 Hearing CC Not Started 02/23/2015 0% 0 Prepare Comp Plan Amendment Submittal Not Started 0% 0 Submit for Metropolitan Council Review Not Started 02/27/2015 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 Submittal Resolution it Metropolitan Council Local Planning Handbook I Amendment Form Comprehensive Plan Amendment Form AMENDMENT NAME This form is available in Microsoft Word format on the Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Assistance website at: htto://www.Metroi)olitanrocouncil.org/Planning/assistance/resources.htm. COMMUNITY PROFILE AND AMENDMENT OVERVIEW 1. Provide the following information: Local governmental unit Contact title Address City, State, and Zip Telephone number FAX number Email address Date of preparation 2. Identify type of amendment and describe. Check all that apply: 2a. Land use change 2b. MUSA Expansion or Change 2c. Text Change 2d. Other 3. Provide a description of the amendment. Affected area, in acres SECTION 1: PROCESS OVERVIEW http://www.metrocouncil.org/planning/LPH/LPHSectl.pdf 4. Indicate official local status of the plan amendment. (Check all that apply.) The local governing body must take action on the proposed amendment before submittal to the Metropolitan Council. Action Acted upon by planning commission Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council review Date of Action 5. List adjacent local governments, school districts and other jurisdictions and the date the copies were sent. Notifying adjacent governmental units and affected school districts is one of the criteria the Council will use in determining whether an application is deemed complete for review. 6. Identify outstanding issues or conditions made in the Metropolitan Council's review of the municipality's 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update or subsequent comprehensive plan amendment? No, the Council's review did not identify any issues or conditions. Issue/Condition Steps taken or future planned actions, including date (e.g.) Tier II Sewer Plan City Engineer drafting. Will submit to Council for review by December 2005. 7. Will/has an environmental review (Environmental Assessment Worksheet, Environmental Impact Statement or Alternative Urban Areawide Review) be/been completed for the site? uired. Yes, indicate type of review and approximate date of completion. Include a summary of L findings, if completed: September 2005 2 SECTION 2: FORECASTS htti)://www.metrocouncil.org/planning/LPH/LPHSect2.pdf 8. Complete the following forecast table to reflect any changes in population, household and employment forecasts. If the proposed amendment does not change the community's household, population or employment forecasts, as shown in the municipalities Metropolitan Systems Statement, fill in the pre and post amendment columns with those forecasts. City-wide Forecasts Pre -Amendment City-wide Forecasts Post -Amendment 2010 2020 2030 2010 2020 2030 Households Population Employment For all amendments that propose land use or forecast changes, you must complete the questions #10 (land use), #11 (housing), #12 (trip generation), #20 (sewer flow) and #30 (water supply). SECTION 3: LAND USE htti)://www.metrocouncil.orq/l)lanning/LPH/LPHSect3.pd 9. Does the plan amendment propose any impacts to wetlands located on the site? the site. to wetlands located on the site. 10. Describe land use changes in acres, applicable to this amendment site, using the following tables and filling in the community's specific land use categories: Not Applicable. Land Use Designation (fill in specific land use categories) All Land Uses Residential Land Uses Only Acres # Units and Density Range Pre CPA Post CPA Pre CPA Post CPA e. Commercial 20 0 NA NA Medium Density Residential 0 20 4-8 units/acre - 0 80-160 units Total CPA = Comprehensive Plan Amendment September 2005 3 11. If the proposed amendment changes the amount of land city wide staged for development by 2011 for medium density, high density or mixed use residential development, complete the following table to identify the amount of land available pre and post amendment : Fill in all land use categories that allow for multifamily residential development Acres city-wide for each land use category Pre -amendment Acres city-wide for each land use category Post -amendment Total Acres Developed acres Developable Acres* Amendment acres** Developable acres a b a-b=c d c+d=e (e.g.) Medium Density Residential 1000 700 300 20 320 "'Developable" means land planned for urban residential development, infill or redevelopment before 2011. " Amendment acres from the municipality's response to Question #10 above. SECTION 4: TRANSPORTATION http://www.metrocouncii.ora/planning/LPH/LPHSect4.pdf 12. Complete the following table using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 61" Edition, to show whether this plan amendment increases or decreases trip generation from the planned land use and transportation element of the community's comprehensive plan. Trip Generation for the Site Based Trip Generation for the Site Based on Planned Land Use on Planned Land Use Pre -Amendment Post -Amendment Est. average daily traffic Est. peak hour traffic 13. Will these changes require improvements to the existing local and regional road network or interchanges beyond what is in the community's current transportation plan? can accommodate increase. and who will pav for Access 14. If the site has direct access to a principal or "A" minor arterial, is location and spacing consistent with applicable County guidelines or MnDOT's Access Management Guidelines (htti)://www.oim.dot.state.mn.us/access/index.html)? September 200S 4 Transit and Other Modes of Transportation 15. Will this amendment enhance access to transit services, increase or decrease the demand for transit services or warrant the extension of new transit service? served by transit or Yes, list existing routes, describe changes and identify proposed/necessary transit facility improvements (e.q. shelters, park and rides): 16. Does the plan amendment include Traffic Demand Management (TDM) strategies or land use and urban design measures, if applicable? No, explain: Yes, describe (e.g. car and van pooling, flexible work hours, mixed land uses that discourage vehicle trips and promote walking. biking. ridesharina. and transit): 17. Does the plan amendment include pedestrian and bike access and facilities, including crosswalks, bridges, trails, sidewalks, and bike racks, if applicable? Aviation 18. Does the plan amendment affect any airport functions? site not within site within airport influence area or search area but no land use compatibility or other SECTION 5: WATER RESOURCES htto://www.metrocouncil.org/planning/LPH/LPHSect5.pdf Wastewater 19. What type of wastewater treatment will be utilized to serve the proposed amendment? Owned/Community Treatment Local/Municipal Owned Wastewater Treatment Plant. Treatment. September 2005 S 20. Complete the following table, to show whether this plan amendment increases or decreases wastewater flow from currently planned land use and sewer flow projections. Total Community Flow Pre -Amendment m d Total Community Flow Post Amendment- m d 2000 2010 2020 2030 Mgd = million gallons per day 21. Does the local wastewater system have adequate capacity, or staged capacity to accommodate the proposed amendment? No, explain: 22. Does the regional wastewater system have adequate capacity, or staged capacity to accommodate the proposed amendment? Yes, explain: No, explain: 23. Has the community and/or Metropolitan Council identified an inflow and infiltration (I&I) problem? for future action: does not have an identified 1/1 24. Identify interceptor(s) that will be impacted by these changes and indicate if flows will be diverted from one interceptor service area to another? 25. Does the plan amendment include any wastewater flow to an adjacent community? For new intercommunity agreements, the receiving community must also amend the sewer element of its plan. a copy of the inter-communit No. September 2005 6 Surface Water 26. Will stormwater runoff generated from proposed amendment be treated on -site? No, check one of the following and describe: no treatment: Runoff will be treated off -site. identifv off -site treatment nYes, describe type and level of on -site pollutant removal treatment/mitigation plans: 27. Does the community have an updated stormwater management plan, including best management practices and implementation strategies? Year 28. Does the community have an adopted erosion control ordinances? Yes, Year No. Water Supply 29. Does the community have an updated water supply plan? Year M 30. Will the proposed plan amendment increase or decrease projected water use from the community's current water supply plan? No increase or decrease in proiected water use water suooly plan amendment to describe SECTION 6: PARKS htti)://www.metrocouncii.or-q/planning/LPH/LPHSect6.1)d 31. Does the amendment include, or is it adjacent to or within ''/z a mile of an existing or planned regional park, reserve or trail, as identified in the 2030 Regional Parks Plan? September 2005 7 32. Does the community have a Parks & Open Space Plan including regional park elements? SECTION 7: IMPLEMENTATION http://www.metrocouncil.org/planning/LPH/LPHSect7.pdf 33. Will the plan amendment require changes in zoning or subdivision ordinances, capital improvement program (CIP), or other official controls? No. chances and timeline: 34. Does the community have natural resources protection ordinances, including wetland, tree preservation, and steep slopes? ice September 2005 8 35. MUSA Expansion or Staging Changes Only. Complete the following table for amendments proposing a MUSA expansion or development staging change, documenting both average net density of sewered residential development since 2000 and remaining land guided for residential uses to 2020. This information is needed so the Council can review and evaluate the amendment for potential impacts to the regional systems. These tables are available on the Council's website in Microsoft Excel format, with automatic calculation of net residential acres, net density, and estimated developable acres. htti)://www.Metropolitanrocouncii.org/planning/assistance/resources.htm. Residential Proiects Anoroved & Constructed 2000-Dresent Development Name Year Approved Year Built Single Family # of Units Multi Family # of Units Acres Gross Residential Acres Wetland & water- bodies Acres Public Parks & Open S ace Acres Arterial Roads ROW Acres Other Undevelop ad land' Net Residential Acres Net Density Units/Acre A B C D E F G H=C-D-E- F-G A+8 /H TOTAL Describe on a separate page any other undeveloped land that does not fall under wetlands and water, public parks or arterial roads, including steep slopes or outlots for future or commercial development. Remaining Land Guided for Residential Uses to 2020 Land Use Category Gross Acres Est. Acres Wetland & Waterbodies Est. Acres Public Parks & Open Space Est. Developable Acres Lowest Allowed Densit Highest Allowed Density A B C D=A-B-C Units/Acre Units/Acre Prepared _/_/_ by September 2005 9 Three Planning Commission members voted against the variance request. The reasoning behind their decision was that the property owners currently have a reasonable use of their property. The property owners can park two vehicles within their garage and two vehicles in the driveway without a hardcover expansion. Furthermore, these council members do not believe that there is adequate assurances that future property owners of the parcel will maintain the future rain garden, porous pavement or impervious pavers, which were both discussed as ways to mitigate the additional storm water run-off on the property due to the hardcover addition. The Planning Commission was in agreement with city staffs recommendation that any driveway addition materials should meet ordinance. City ordinance states, "driveways shall be surfaced with bituminous, concrete or other hard surface material, as approved by the city engineer." Gravel is not considered an allowable improved hard surface for driveways. City staff is recommending denial of the variance request; however, staff has provided findings of fact for both approval and denial of the proposed hard surface coverage variance request. If the City Council's decision is to approve the request, then the requirement for storm water mitigation in the form of a rain garden be required of the applicant. Planning Commission minutes are a consent agenda item in the City Council packet for November 10, 2014. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the motion denying the 2.7 percent hard cover variance and the findings of fact and decision. Since the Planning Commission was split on this application, staff has also provided findings of fact and decision for approval of the variance request. ATTACHMENTS Planning Commission Staff Report Dated October 21, 2014 Findings of Fact and Decision (Denial) Findings of Fact and Decision (Approval) Figure 2-1. LAND USE TABLE IN 5-YEAR STAGES Existing and Planned Land Use Table (in acres) Residential Land Uses Low Density Residential (developed) 1.2 4 2,600 3,100 3,9 4,49 4,54� 4,69; 2,06 Low Density Residential (vacant) 2,102 1,602 779 2 152 Medium Density Residential (developed) 4 8 155 300 326 356 381 3 Medium Density Residential (vacant) 245 too 80' Jto I I - High DensityResidential (developed) 8 16 55 112 140 187 202 Q& I�-M High Density Residential (vacant) 163 106 1DO 05 28 E3 - Mixed Use Primarily Residential' (developed) 8 20 30 40 lvo'x �9 Mixed Use Primarily Residential' (vacant) 20 10 F! CII Land Uses Est. Employees/Acre Commercial (developed) 25 240 270 300 318 320 328 88 Commercial (vacant) 88 58 28 10 8 Industrial (developed) 7 500 Off 0 E41 Industrial (vacant) 383 251 83 42 23 Office (developed) 28 240 260 3a.-f Office (vacant) 99 79 35 14 5 - Mixed Use Primarily C/I• (developed) 26 35 40 45 A5 65 x Mixed Use PrimarilyC/I• (vacant) 30 25 I `� - Extractive - Public/Semi Public Land Uses Institutional 1,213 1,213 1,212 1,212 1,212 1,212 (1) Parks and Recreation 417 430 438 457 457 457 40 Open Space 9341 934 4 Roadway Rights of Way 1,2371 1,237 1 1,237 1 1,237 1 1,237 1.237 - Utility Railroad Airport Subtotal Seweretl Rural Residential 2.5 acres or less 10,7861 10,7991 10,807 1 10,826 1 10,826 10,1126 3,170 - Rural Residential 2.5 -10 acres 2.5 na 971 971 71 AITW M110wri Rural Residential 10-40 acres - Agricultural 40+acres 40 27 19 - - - (40) Agriculture land use 904 904 904 904 904 904 - Subtotal Unsewered 1,915 1.902 1,894 1,875 1.875 1,875 (40) Undeveloped Wetlands (within land use designations) 2,210 2.210 2,210 2,210 2.210 2,210 - Open Water, Rivers and Streams 2,059 2,059 2, 2,0 2, 2,0 7.b Total 14,760 14,760 14,760 14,760 14,760 14,760 3,1 0 42� 1L G:\PLAN\2008 Comp PlanWmendments\Land Use Map\Arbor Cove-Westwood\Land Use 5 year Arbor Cove.xls 11/3/2014 Fi 2-2 2008 - 2030 Land Use Co aril 2020 2030 Land Use Plan Land Use Plan Change 2020-2030 neuw r Land Use Acres Percent Acres Percent Acres Commercial 142 1.2% 328 2.2% 186 Office/Indushial 694 5.7% 843 5.7% 1491ss Office 114 0.9% 2.0% 181 o+oslz Parks & Open Space 1,297 10.6% 1,402 9.50/6 105 Public/Semi-Public 1,204 9.9% 1,210 8.2% 6 Residential Large Lot 870 7.1% 948 6.4% 78 Residential Low Density 3,295 27.0% 4,696 31.8% 1,401 Residential Medium Density 219 1.8% 496 3.40/6 277 Residential High Density 120 TN 1.0% 240 1.60/0 120 Mixed Use 51 0.40/6 1" 1.00/0 93 Undevelopable 4,200 34.40/6 4178 28.3% 22 TOTAL 12,206 14, 2574 0 Undevelo able awa Lakes, Flood lain, Rivers, Streams 2,037 Road Right -of -Way 1,237 Agriculture 904 TOTAL 4,178 c\PUM3008Cann PtnNm"mas"S Uw WPICMH 611M use mmp 2p -20WO 1112112014 c:�vurr¢ooe came amawmmemwauem ��e rn.v�csaH eiueb �v, mmw�azoos-sa & 11MW4 PROJECT CONTEXT LAND USE 2030 Ilk G ",„•" �� i PM•' pin �ancssrM rueuc f� � ��} �FF$uFM+NMOx OFH111Y 1u ,..:,�..r _�.)i+j+. , f' • ' Y "_ '. � illy - COUNTRY ROAD 8ICORRIDOR STUDY OPENHOUSr May zz,zoia�H�'. '(��;,aM y �k CU U . ,Cw /En .F, �3 1 cr3 o_ Q W Z W 0 W W Z p -.- W 0 t �7 y a W R r 5 f 7 E Mill Al w Si ml M HKprojarea Yes Constraine (All) Row Labels Sum of HKacres �( AGRICULTURE 846.8273 AGRICULTURE 824.5125 ✓;LF OFFICE 15.968 �LQS 4- PARKS OPEN SPACE 3.0957 RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY 3.2511 ✓I `� ' , 7 OFFICE 158.6151 1 " MIXED USE VILLAGE 10.9791 OFFICE 84.494 RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY OFFICE INDUSTRIAL 63.142 81.9244 ✓C MIXED USE VILLAGE 17.5996^/�� OFFICE INDUSTRIAL 41.8738 PARKS OPEN SPACE 7.5555 ✓/�rJ� RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY 14.8955 PARKS OPEN SPACE 41.8188 ✓./),� �` PARKS OPEN SPACE 41.8188 r RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY 0 RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY 67.2983A �✓�� RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY 67.2983 RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT 38.9997 RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT 15.6856 11 ✓�L� RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY 23.3141 20.3766 RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY 0.001 RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY 20.3756 ✓n� +(. (blank) 199.8702 MIXED USE VILLAGE 0.1925 PARKS OPEN SPACE 0.058 A_•` tt x RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY 0.0566 RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY 0.0403�� (blank) 199.5228 ✓!�� Grand Total 1455.7304 -4r)2e Z3.31�I ,,�v5 + is �� I J ✓ e L�.. ._. , I z3 , 31 �Ju HKprojarea Yes Constraine (Multiple Items) Row Labels Sum of HKacres AGRICULTURE 16.5303 OFFICE 76.4553 OFFICE INDUSTRIAL 60.7656 PARKS OPEN SPACE 0 RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY 33.118 RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT 11.452 RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY 0.0004 (blank) 0.7264 Grand Total 199.048 Figure 2-2 2008 - 2030 Land Use Comparison 20201 2030 Land Use Plan Land Use Plan Change 2020-2030 Land Use Acres Percent Acres Percent Acres camnrr77on. Commercial 142 1.2% 328 2.2% 186 ,,s77 Office/Industrial 694 5.7% 4043 6.0% / Office 114 0.9% 33v 2.3% 221 Parks & Open Space 1,297 10.6% 9.4% /aS 94 Public/Semi-Public 1,204 9.9% 1,212 8.2% 8 Residential Large Lot 8701 7.1 % 9fi1- 6.6% Residential Low Density 3,295 27.0% 4,69 31.8% 1,399 Residential Medium Density 219 1.8% 4%A98 2.8% -zr7 i 18fi Residential High Density 120 1.0% Z-6 1.5% / Za Mixed Use 51 0.4% 1 0.8% 95 -eg' Undevelopable 4,200 34.4%'* 28.5% < ZZ - TOTAL 12,206 14,760 2554 Undevelopable "9a Lakes, Floodplain, Rivers, Streams 2,059 Road Right -of -Way 1,237 Agriculture 904 TOTAL 4,200 G:%PL N=8 Comp PIaOAme,,Jments\Land Use MapWrbor Cove-WesmoodVand use comparison 2008 - 2030.xis 11�/2014 'L1 Fsl . �z��4 — � ; -Y 33 I \�/S- 43 i Z:e.'7 7 ZZ, 7 i I ci1f s � oL i i i i is� i f I i i k t � HKprojarea Constraine Row Labels MIXED USE VILLAGE OFFICE OFFICE INDUSTRIAL PARKS OPEN SPACE RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (blank) Grand Total Yes (Multiple Items) Sum of HKacres 26.6258 21.9725 15 Acres Additional in Driving Range Area? 25.7877 7.1185 45.4381 0.0122 71.6673 0.4259 199.048 romp PLAN Developable Acres Developable Acres East Developable Acres NW Developable Acres SW AGRICULTURE 16.5303 0.5623 15.968 OFFICE 76.4553 22.9876 53.4501 OFFICE INDUSTRIAL 60.7656 34.3973 26.2718 PARKS OPEN SPACE 0 0 RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY 33.118 33.118 RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT 111.452 11.06641 0.3856 RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY 10.0004 0.0004 r.Riii:IMULT I --------------- Developable Acres Developable Acres East Developable Acres NW Developable Acres SW MIXED USE VILLAGE COM .3 7.98774 4.70826 3.0696 0.17967 OFFICE 21.9725 21.7447 0.2229 OFFICE INDUSTRIAL 25.7877 0.0099 25.7778 PARKS OPEN SPACE 7.1185 7.1185 RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY 45.4381 45.4296 RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT 10.0122 0.0122 RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY 171.6673 1 18.1561 53.508 MIXED USE VILLAGE MDR .7 18.63806 10.98594 7.1624 0.41923 Low FAR/Units High FAR/Units East Low East High NW Low NW High SW Low SW High 0.2 0.3 SF - - 200,268 300,402 465,657 698,486 0.3 0.5 SF 449,504 749,173 - - 343,320 572,200 8 16 Dwelling Units 265 530 - - 0.2 0.5 IDwelling Units - 2 6 0 0 1.2 14 IDwelling Units 0 1 0 - Low FAR/Units High FAR/Units East Low East High NW Low NW High SW Low SW High 0.25 0.35 SF 51,273 71,782 33,428 46,799 1,957 2,739 0.2 0.3 SF - - 189,440 284,160 1,942 2,913 0.3 0.5 SF 129 216 - - 336,864 561,440 8 16 Dwelling Units 363 727 - - - 0.21 0.5 Dwelling Units 0 1 0 41 81 Dwelling Units 73 145 1214 428 41 8 Dwelling Units 1 44 1 88 1 29 57 1 2 1 3 A-s CITY OF CBANBASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952.22T1100 Fax:952.227,1110 Building Inspections Phone:952.227.1180 Fax:952.227.1190 Engineering Phone:952.22T1160 Fax: 952.2271170 Finance Phone:952.227.1140 Fax:952.227,1110 Park & Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 Fax:952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 Fax:952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone:952.227.1130 Fax:952.2271110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone:952,227.1125 Fax:952.227.1110 MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director Paul Oehme, PE, Public pWorks Director/City Engineer DATE: May 12, 2014 OAS SUBJ: CSAH 61 Corridor and Utility Study BACKGROUND The consultants have completed the first two tasks in the planning process and staff is prepared for the open house on May 221deat the Chanhassen Library. A parcel -by - parcel analysis of the site was completed resulting in the potential development of 200 acres along the corridor. The sewer and water study by SEH is underway. This will determine if municipal services can be provided along the corridor. The corridor study will provide abundant data as the city moves towards the next update of the comprehensive plan in 2018. If the city needs to reexamine land uses or delivery of municipal services, this study will provide the supporting data. ANALYSIS The purpose of the open house is provide an opportunity for affected parties to learn about the following upcoming projects: • 101 River Crossing • County Road 61 Flood Mitigation Project 01 • Corridor Study Representatives from MnDOT, Carver and Hennepin Counties as well as city staff will be attending the open house. Notices for the meeting were sent to 278 addresses. The following maps will be available for review and comment: • MnDOT River Crossing Plans Hennepin County 61 Flood Mitigation Plans Natural Resources and Constraints Web Sit— o Wetlands and Fens www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us o Flood Plain o Tree Cover, Open Space and Surface Water o Buffer zones and Slopes Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Todd Gerhardt CSAH 61 Corridor and Utility Study May 12, 2014 Page 2 • Developable Parcels • Zoning • Land Use 2030 • Alternative Scenario's • Parcel Access and alternatives • Potential Sewer and Water Plans This is the first of two open houses. The second is proposed for some time in July. A summary of the comments from both meetings with be shared with the City Council. Attached are the maps the will be used at the meeting as well as the Corridor Planning Process. ATTACHMENTS 1. Notice of Open House. 2. Open House Notification Area Map. 3. Open House Display Boards (12) prepared by SRF. 4. Figure 1 — LB Development -Growth Areas. 5. Figure 3 —Waste Water Flow Conveyance Recommendation (2030 CP). 6. Figure 4 — LB Water Service Development. g:�plan161 corridor study\study update co.docx 61 SOUYFI' 101 ��!"11't �IPI�CC V�1 ®pen House Highways 101 / 61 Southwest Reconnection Project & Highway 61 Future Development and Utility Study May 225 2014, 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM Chanhassen Public Library 7711 Kerber Boulevard, Chanhassen Please join us at an open house for the upcoming reconstruction project affecting the Highway 101 River Crossing, the County Road 61/Flying Cloud Drive corridor, and the study of land uses and potential City services in the corridor. Attendees will be able to learn about the Reconnection project, view project timelines and construction staging, and ask questions about the project. The event will be hosted by the following partner agencies: the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Carver County, Scott County, and the Cities of Chanhassen and Shakopee. Highway 101 / County Road 61 Flood Mitigation Project The project will construct a new four -lane Highway 101 spanning the floodplain between the existing Highway 101 Minnesota River Bridge in Shakopee and County Road 61/Flying Cloud Drive in Chanhassen. The goal is to minimize transportation disruptions caused by seasonal flooding of the Minnesota River. Additionally, the Highway 101/County Road 61 "Y" intersection will be reconstructed as a roundabout to accommodate the new Highway 101 Bridge and future traffic growth. Flood Mitigation Project Current Status Construction is anticipated to begin mid -May and will last through the Fall of 2015. The project will be constructed in stages to maintain traffic, although temporary closures will occur. Representatives from MnDOT and Carver County will be present to discuss the traffic staging plan and detours. Corridor Study The City of Chanhassen is working on a Highway 61 Corridor study for potential future development. The City intends to prepare for the anticipated development interest in the area by creating a more comprehensive plan for the Highway 61 Corridor. The study includes a utility analysis to determine if it is cost effective to extend municipal sewer and water services to the study area. If municipal services are determined not cost effective to service the area, the scope of the study may change to review alternative land use and development plans. City staff will be present to review the scope of the report, give an update on the status and answer any questions. - f CCAR\ 4R r_ CCNPiTY SHNK ?Ih, o | ;|| / })\ E . _2 f§=\)!!! _!e \�. z3:Lu wLLI I OIL ■ / E a / � | ! ! ! : is f jj! #J11 !!!! ! ,ha4846hR!\ \ � \ 2 }(\@!!R§ <� Q � CI§ 22\\\§«\ y is-. �.. n t"z ' 1 iH } F- X W L r Z 0 V CF- .) W n C9 oz ItQ aN r lilt 7 10i, E p a S "x 8G} P i 33 i R 5 E a LL sf" &ib Zi aazi❑- gttg€ F s UIf 14 s _ �ll�f�#Hli��(�IIIIIIIIIIIiiIIiIIIIIIiINIIIHI llll l My $: ' ��' Wit• r •� w:R , . !T- - --- z LLI 5 CL 0 .j LLJ V- > LU .j All LU LU CL < lit, i I oil P a uj CL W y�L ip`�L,SiY V i .fiLU r `1 t cLU c g,� },.• do t-Y Nl i..< gf i �h'a3 QCL (� �. iE! < y,s �: i $ '",� a• ,bra <-✓ } � t 1 :1 y^ r Fk rs 0 p 1 g W � r I JAY �. i Lu W r y Pp}a y /may • t 1'7-`kFt k.' LU _ t Vy f m W } a� al � k, I �Ezr �yr4 /A SEH '� o em tuo �ees vnisa cw�rrH tmsss AP vegMPCPlfell oe. Riot Dtts SRlte R. MM.MN!!FO MMIPlT�O9R n99:m nut: PlO�lox�la wy�,l,.,. V/��'�e>xbxrof I _ 7 1' _ (� i'1 i1�� ti ` ? 1. Legend - Shared West - Shared Center - East Growth Area - NW Growth Area - SW Growth Area ' Undevelopable Area ; Co Rd 61 Development Growth Areas CR 61 Corridor Study Chanhassen. MN Figure 1 1 L" Uft Im Shared Center Area 0.083 MGD C� North Wesl i 0 Shared Center Lift Station Growth Area Shared Wes,[Area,, .. - 0.127 MG 0,070 MGD I-, ' -- _—.% t L South Weft LiR Station 6,397 MGD Legend J- Existing Lift Stations Future Lift Stations --0— Existing Gravity Sewer t 0- Future Graft Sewer Future Force Main 'Lg `2 Shared West Shared Center East Growth Area N NW Growth Area SW Growth Area Prld 000 "MOO Waste Water Flow Conveyance Recommendation Figure CR 61 Corridor Study 3 5EH Chanhassen, MN ---------- --- a a a. E < w w O _ • O y Q i . r -Ti 6 C p < 9 w „ cn � 0 • O _ � � � � 6 4 A • gx 4 3 Pt CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 March 3, 1986 Mr. Michael Sorenson 7606 Erie Avenue Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Sorenson: This is to confirm that on February 24, 1986, the City Council approved your request for the vacation of the platted streets and alley in Happs First Addition with the following condition: 1. That the vacation of the streets and alley will not be certified prior to the recording of the final plat and completion of the Torrens proceedings. The City Council approved your subdivision request to replat Happs First Addition and adjacent metes and bounds property into one six acre parcel with the following condition: 1. That the final plat will not be recorded prior to the completion of the Torrens proceedings. The City Council also approved your request for a conditional use permit for eight cold storage bays and outside storage based on the site plan stamped "Received February 3, 1986" with the following conditions: 1. The conditional use permit will not be recorded and a building permit not issued until the Torrens proceeding is completed. 2. Approval by MnDOT and compliance with their condition regarding access and drainage within state right-of-way, including regrading and landscaping existing driveway entrances. 3. The fence on the eastern boundary be made of natural material and be 100% opaque. 4. Any expansion of the site will require another conditional use permit. Mr. Sorenson ` March 3, 1986 Page 2 5. The site will not contain any sanitary facilities and will not be used for habitation. 6. The existing debris on the site will be removed before occupancy of the building. 7. Existing vegetation from the front lot line to the 750 con- tour shall not be disturbed other than the driveway. 8. All lighting shall be shielded from adjacent property. 9. Should the existing trees and vegetation not screen the use, the city can require the applicant to place additional landscaping/fencing on the site if needed. 10. Any signage must receive a permit and meet the requirements of the Sign Ordinance. 11. outside storage shall be provided only to persons who are renting a storage bay. Each storage bay will be allowed 1,200 square feet of outside storage, for a total of 9,600 square feet. Outside storage shall be permitted only within the parking area and shall exclude junk vehicles, construc- tion debris, appliances and any items determined by staff to be unsightly and warrant indoor storage. The outside storage will be reviewed annually at which time the City can require additional screening or removal of certain items. 12. The site will be reviewed annually by City staff to deter- mine whether it is necessary to pave the gravel parking lot, if additional screening is needed and if the outside storage is in compliance with condition #11. A copy of this letter will be included in the City Council packet for March 17, 1986, as an "administrative section" item to insure that the conditions represent Council's intent on this matter. The vacation of the streets and alley of Happs First Addition Replat and the conditional use permit for the cold storage and outside storage will not be certified until the Torrens procedure is completed. No alteration to the site can take place prior to the conditional use permit and vacation certification and recording of the final plat. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Jo Ann Olsen Assistant City Planner JO:v ►zAh L CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 o CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937-1900 • FAX (612) 937-5739 February 22, 1990 Mr. Mike Sorenson 7606 Erie Avenue Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Sorenson: On February 7, 1990, the Planning Commission reviewed your request for a conditional use permit to expand your cold storage facility on Hwy. 212. At your request, the Planning Commission recommended tabling action on the item until improvements to the site could be made which would bring it into conformance with the original conditional use permit for the one cold storage ware- house facility currently located on the site. The following is a list of items that must be completed prior to the Planning Commission reviewing any expansion to the subject site. These were developed from the original conditions of approval and from actions we believe to be necessary to correct situations that you created. 1. A fence shall be located on the eastern boundary and shall be made of natural material and be 100% opaque as shown on the original site plan. 2. The proposed berming and landscaping on the current (19%) site plan shall be completed to replace the vegetation that has been removed on site which was to act as a screen between the buildings and Hwy. 212 and surrounding proper- ties. 3. No further offices shall be permitted within the existing mini -storage structure. Any offices currently under construction in the existing structure shall be removed. Staff is willing to accept the placement of a single bathroom and building heating that are currently in place. While these violate the original approval, city staff appears to have accepted these alterations in the past. However, all final building permits, inspections and certificates of occu- pancy required by the City Public Safety Department, shall be obtained. 4. Existing contractor's yards activities are not permitted and shall be removed. Mr. Mike Sorenson February 22, 1990 Page 2 5. Pave the entrance drive up to the building to reduce erosion and running of storm drainage and mud into the MnDOT right- of-way. Curbing is required to control drainage. 6. The applicant shall meet with staff and the Watershed District to agree on a plan for providing storm water manage- ment on the site. 7. The grading plan shall be revised to provide a maximum 21:1 steepness of slopes. B. Erosion control shall be installed prior to construction on the site and shall be Type III erosion control. 9. Ground cover shall be established on all exposed areas with hydro -seeding, use of fiber blankets and other methods used as required to stablize slopes. 10. Satisfy MnDOT's access permit requirements. The Planning Commission will not review the expansion of your site until the above items have been completed. Staff recommends that you meet with Planning and Engineering Departments and a representative of the Watershed District and MnDOT to determine exactly what plans, permits, etc. are necessary for activity to take place on the site. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact myself or Paul Krauss at 937-1900. Sincerely, Jo Ann Olsen Senior Planner JO:v cc: Dave Hempel, Engineering Steve Kirchman, Building Don Ashworth, City Manager Don Chmiel, Mayor Original CUP Conditions 1. CUP not recorded and Building permit not issued until the Torrens proceeding is completed. • This condition has been met 2. Approval by MnDot and compliance with their condition regarding access and drainage within state right-of-way, including re -grading and landscaping existing driveway entrances. • This condition has not been met 3. The fence on the eastern boundary be made of natural material and be 100%opaque. • This condition has been met (additional maintenance or planting may be necessary) 4. Any expansion of the site will require another conditional use permit. • 1989 Expansion request tabled due to nonconforming issues 5. The site will not contain any sanitary facilities and will not be used for habitation. • 1990 letter from Joanne Olson stating after the fact sanitary facility and heating may remain in the building. 6. The existing debris on the site will be removed before occupancy of the building. • Debris located in rear yard 7. Existing vegetation from the front lot line to the 750 contour shall not be disturbed other than the driveway. • Much of the vegetation has been removed 8. All lighting shall be shielded from adjacent property. • This condition has been met 9. Should the existing trees and vegetation not screen the use; the city can require the applicant to place additional landscaping/fencing on the site if needed. 10. Any signage must receive a permit and meet the requirements of the sign ordinance. • Two illegal signs are located along Flying Cloud Drive 11. Outside storage shall be provided only to persons who are renting a storage bay. Each storage bay will be allowed 1,200 sq ft of outside storage, for a total of 9,600 sq ft. Outside storage shall be permitted only within the parking area and shall exclude junk vehicles, construction debris, appliances and any items determined by staff to be unsightly and warrant indoor storage. The outside storage will be reviewed annually at which time the city can require additional screening or removal of certain items. • Several items related to the illegal businesses are stored outside in the rear yard 12. The site will be reviewed annually by city staff to determine whether it is necessary to pave the gravel parking lot if additional screening is needed and if the outside storage is in compliance with condition #11. No response to letter as of April 3, 1990: deadline of June 29, 1990 for corrections. It appears that there are two businesses being run out of the property 1. Air Compressors Plus: Factory Direct Outlet 2. Full Spectrum Motors: Auto, Marine & Small Engine i April 2, 2014 C'�ff OpF�1 u CHMNSEN P R Kelly Properties LLC 550 Flying Cloud Drive C Chaska, MN 55318-9502 7100 Markei Boulevard Pn Chanhassen. MNN 55317 Re: Conditional Use Permit #86-01 Cold Storage g e To Whom It May Concern: Administration Phone, 952 2271100 Fax:952.227.1110 After conducting an inspection on March 5, 2014, the City has determined that the P property located at 550 Flying Cloud Drive is noncompliant with the Conditional Use Building Inspections Permit (CUP) #86-01. The City previously informed you of this noncompliance in a letter Phone 952.2271180 dated April 27, 2010. Items that do not comply with the approved Conditional Use Permit Fax 952 2271190 for the Cold Storage Unit are listed below. Engineering Phone 952.227.1160 1. The use of the buildinghas been changed from eight cold storage bays, g Y,h g ys, with limited Fax 952.2271170 outdoor storage, to containing commercial businesses. The CUP was not amended to permit commercial use; therefore, any businesses located in the building are illegal. Finance Phone 952.2271140 2. Outdoor storage on the site is limited to persons renting a storage bay. Each storage Fax:952.227.1110 bay will be allowed 1,200 square feet of outside storage. All outdoor storage shall be Park 11 Recreation Recreation permitted only within the parking area and shall exclude junk vehicles, construction Park 1120 debris, appliances, etc. Currently, there is a significant amount of outdoor storage on Fax: 952 2271110 the site that does not comply with the CUP, including several vehicles (some inoperable), tires, wood, and other miscellaneous items and debris. Recreation Center 2310 Caller Boulevard 3. Any expansion of the site will require another conditional use permit. Phone 952227..1400 Fax. 952.2271404 Furthermore, please note that CUP #86-01 requires the existing vegetation from the front lot line to the 750 contour shall not be disturbed other than the driveway. Planning d Natural Resources Phone 952 227,1130 It is the intention of the City to work with you to bring the property into compliance with Fax 952 2271110 the Conditional Use Permit. Please contact me to discuss a timeframe for the removal or relocation of items stored on the site. Public Works 7901 Park Place If you have questions or concerns, feel free to contact me at 952-227-1131 or by email at Phone 952 2211300 kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Fax 952.2271310 Senior Center Sincerely, Phone.95P.21125 I A Fax: 952.227.11.1110 Web Silo Kate Aanenson, AICP www ci,dianhassen inn us Community Development Director Enclosures OplanIcup iup wapannual inspection documents'somnson cold storage cup 86-01 .loner or noncompliance 3-5-14.doc Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorror+ April 27, 2010 ry OF P R Kelly Properties LLC Cirl 11 ! f 550 Flying Cloud Drive MINUMN Chaska, MN 55318-9502 7700 Market Boulevard Re: Conditional Use Permit #86-01 Cold Storage PO Box 147 Chanhassen. MN 55317 Dear Management: Administration This letter is in response to the CUP compliance inspection which was conducted on Phone 952.2271100 April 20, 2010. The following items were found to be noncompliant with the Fax: 952 2271 n0 approved conditions of approval for Cold Storage: Building Inspections Phone 952.2271180 1. The use of the building has been changed from eight cold storage bays with Fax: 952 227.1190 limited outdoor storage to containing two commercial businesses. The CUP was not amended to permit commercial use. Therefore, the two business located in Engineering the building are illegal. Phone:952.2271160 Fax:952.2271170 2 The Air Compressors Plus and Full Spectrum Motors signage do not have sign Finance permit approval and do not comply with the city's sign ordinance. Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax:952.227.1110 3. Outdoor storage o Limited to persons renting a storage bay. Each storage by will b*wed. , square feet of outside storage. All outdoor Park a Recreation storage shall be pffmitted only within the parking area and shall exclude junk Phone 552.2271120 vehicles, construction debris, applitinpes, etc. There is a significant amount of Fax:952.227.1110 outdoor storage on'lhe site, including eral vehicles, boat, trailers, storage Recreation Center containers, wood, another miscellaneous items and debris. 2310 Couller Boulevard 4. The ittry facilities. Phone: 952.227.1400 site will not contain sanitary Fax 952.227.1404 5. Existing vegetation form the front lot L ne to the 750 contour shall not be Planning & disturbed other than the driveway. Natural Resources Phone: 952.2271130 As I stated previously, it is my intent to work with you, in doing so, please provide Fax:952.227.1110 me with your intent to bring the site into compliance with the approved CUP and conditions of approval. If you have questions or concerns, feel free to contact me at Public Works 7901 Park Place 952-227-1132 or akairies&i.chenhessen.mn.us. Phone:952.227.1300 Fax9522271310 Sincerely, Senior Center Phone. 952.227.1125 Fax 952 2271110 Angie Kairies Web Site Planner I wwwxi cfivnnassen.mn us Enclosure g:%ptaolcup iup vxaplarmual umpection documents'smx=on cold storage cup 86-0IUeeer of ooncorroplience dna.doc Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providingfor Fooayarni Planninglor Tomorrow L r P .,� wAzc, 44%W14. Ms. ulol r Commmunnityity Devev ment Director City of Eden Prairie `lat 1s 8080 Mit. II Road Eden airie, MN 55344 Mr. R. Michael Le �� Community D opment Direcor City of Sh pee 129 §pd1b Holmes Street SOfopee, MN 55379 leftlItte, "Erada4s �IativalJiaaa� aN11al Sco unty ourth Avenue West 1 �� Shakopee, MN 55379 Oil755�ntry t Citod 57lub RoadShd, MN 55331 ;unrara Dir. Ms. Laurie Hokk City Maria, may} City of ona P. ox 36 ctoria, MN 55386 Ms. Tara Beard Mr. Paul Moline Land Use Manager Planning & Water Management Hennepin County Housing, Community Carver County Works & Transit 600 East Fourth Street 701 4th Avenue South Chaska, MN 55318 Minneapolis, MN 55415-1843 Ms. Rose Menke Township Clerk Jackson Township 920 Rosewood Circle Shakopee, MN 55379 Dr. James Bauck Q Mr. Kevin Ringwald Superintenden a—� t Community Development Director Eastern C er County School District City of Chaska 11 Pe y Road One City Hall Plaza Ch a, MN 55318 Chaska, MN 55318 Mr. Tod Sherman Developmen sews Coordinator MNDep Transportation 1500 est County Road B2 Rcteeville, MN 55113 Dr. Dennis Peterson Superintendent Minnetonka School District 276 5621 County Road 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Ms. Julie Wischnack Community Development Director City of Minnetonka 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345 SCANNED L December 12, 2014 OF Cl�' Mr. Tod Sherman lmml Cll[Illlltfl)SEN Development Reviews Coordinator MN Dept. of Transportation 7700 Market Boulevard 1500 West County Road B2 PO Box 147 Roseville, MN 55113 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Administration Chapter 2 — Land Use, Land Use Map Amendment PFax:952.227.11100 Fax: 952.2271110 Dear Mr. Sherman: Building Inspections Communities in the metropolitan area must submit proposed comprehensive plan updates Phone:952.2271180 to adjacent governments, affected special districts lying in whole or in part within the Fax: 952.227.1190 metropolitan area, and affected school districts for review and comment. The purpose of Engineering the notification is to allow interested parties to review and comment on the plan before Phone: 952.227.1160 Metropolitan Council review. The Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook Fax:952.227.1170 advises that such notifications must be distributed 60 days before the plan amendment is sent to the Council for its review. Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 The City of Chanhassen is in the process of amending the Land Use Map and Land Use Fax: 952.227.1110 Element to incorporate changes in land uses with the CSAH 61 Corridor. Please review Park & Recreation the enclosed information pertaining to the proposed City of Chanhassen 2030 Phone: 952.227.1120 Comprehensive Plan amendment and provide any comments as soon as possible but no Fax: 952.227.1110 later than February 10, 2015. Recreation Center If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 952-227-1139 2310 Coulter Boulevard or email kaanensonAci.chanhassen.mn.us as soon as possible. If you have no comments, Phow 952.227.1400 please check the box below, sign, date, and return this form to me in the enclosed Fax: 952.227.1404 envelope at your earliest convenience. Planning it Natural Resources Thank you for your prompt assistance in this matter. Phone:952.227.1130 Far 952.227.1110 Sincerely, Public WorksJO,Ot (�,�� 1�,� I `� 7901 Park Place �ihJ� � Phone:952.22T1300 Fax:952,227.1310 Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Senior Candor Phone:952.227.1125 Attachments: Fax: 952.227.1110 weksite 1. Figure 2-1 Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 2. Figure 2-2 2008-2030 Land Use Consumption 3. CSAH Land Use Amendment Spreadsheet 4. 2030 Land Use Map County Road 61 Current and Proposed Land Use 5. County Road 61 land Use Amendment Parcels Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow December 12, 2014 Ul OF Ms. Julie Wischnack l Community Development Director CgA NSFJ City of Minnetonka 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard 7700 Market Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345 PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Chapter 2 — Land Use, Land Use Map Amendment Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Fax:952.227.1110 Dear Ms. Wischnack: Building Inspections Communities in the metropolitan area must submit proposed comprehensive plan updates Phone: 952.227.1180 to adjacent governments, affected special districts lying in whole or m part within the Fax:952.227.1190 metropolitan area, and affected school districts for review and comment. The purpose of Engineering the notification is to allow interested parties to review and comment on the plan before Phone:952.227.1160 Metropolitan Council review. The Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook Fax:952.227.1170 advises that such notifications must be distributed 60 days before the plan amendment is sent to the Council for its review. Finance Phone:952.227.1140 The City of Chanhassen is in the process of amending the Land Use Map and Land Use Fax:952.227.1110 Element to incorporate changes in land uses with the CSAH 61 Corridor. Please review the enclosed information pertaining to the proposed City of Chanhassen 2030 Park & Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 Comprehensive Plan amendment and provide any comments as soon as possible but no Fax: 952.2271110 later than February 10, 2015. Recreation Center If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 952-227-1139 2310 Coulter Boulevard or email kaanenson(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us as soon as possible. If you have no comments, Phone: 952.227.1400 please check the box below, sign, date, and return this form to me in the enclosed Fax:952.2271404 envelope at your earliest convenience. Planning & Natural Resources Thank you for your prompt assistance in this matter. Phone.952.227.1130 Fax:952.2271110 Sincerely, Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.2271310 Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Attachments: Fax:952.227.1110 1. Figure 2-1 Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 2. Figure 2-2 2008-2030 Land Use Consumption 3. CSAH Land Use Amendment Spreadsheet 4. 2030 Land Use Map County Road 61 Current and Proposed Land Use 5. County Road 61 land Use Amendment Parcels Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow December 12, 2014 CITY OF Mr. Kevin Ringwald CHA NSEN Community Development Director City of Chaska 7700 Market Boulevard One City Hall Plaza PO Box 147 Chaska, MN 55318 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Administration Chapter 2 — Land Use, Land Use Map Amendment Phone:952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Dear Mr. Ringwald: Building Inspections Communities in the metropolitan area must submit proposed comprehensive plan updates Phone: 952.227.1180 to adjacent governments, affected special districts lying in whole or in part within the Fax:952.227.1190 metropolitan p area, and affected school districts for review and comment. The purpose of Engineering the notification is to allow interested parties to review and comment on the plan before Phone:952.2271160 Metropolitan Council review. The Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook Fax: 952.227.1170 advises that such notifications must be distributed 60 days before the plan amendment is sent to the Council for its review. Finance Phone:952.227.1140 The City of Chanhassen is in the process of amending the Land Use Map and Land Use Fax: 952.227.1110 Element to incorporate changes in land uses with the CSAH 61 Corridor. Please review Park & Recreation the enclosed information pertaining to the proposed City of Chanhassen 2030 Phone: 952,227.1120 Comprehensive Plan amendment and provide any comments as soon as possible but no Fax: 952.227.1110 later than February 10, 2015. Recreation Center If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 952-227-1139 2310 Coulter Boulevard or email kaanensonla.ci.chanhassen.mn.us as soon as possible. If you have no comments, PFax:952.227.14040 lease check the box below, sign, date, and return this form to me in the enclosed Fax:952.2271404 p envelope at your earliest convenience. Planning & Natural Resources Thank you for your prompt assistance in this matter. Phone,952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Sincerely, Public Works I i9 , 7901 Park Place lK�^D�i/1"1` Phone:952.227.1300 i�—t/wp l Fax: 952.227.1310 Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Attachments: Fax: 952.227.1110 website 1. Figure 2-1 Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 2• Figure 2-2 2008-2030 Land Use Consumption 3. CSAH Land Use Amendment Spreadsheet 4. 2030 Land Use Map County Road 61 Current and Proposed Land Use 5. County Road 61 land Use Amendment Parcels Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow December 12, 2014 Dr. James Bauck Superintendent Utfflr »t fl Eastern Carver County School District 7700 Market Boulevard 11 Peavey Road PO Box 147 Chaska, MN 55318 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Administration Chapter 2 — Land Use, Land Use Map Amendment Phone:952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Dear Dr. Bauck: Building Inspections Communities in the metropolitan area must submit proposed comprehensive plan updates Phone: 952.227.1180 to adjacent governments, affected special districts lying in whole or in part within the Fax:952.227.1190 metropolitan area, and affected school districts for review and comment. The purpose of Engineering the notification is to allow interested parties to review and comment on the plan before Phone: 952.2271160 Metropolitan Council review. The Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook Fax: 952.227.1170 advises that such notifications must be distributed 60 days before the plan amendment is sent to the Council for its review. Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 The City of Chanhassen is in the process of amending the Land Use Map and Land Use Fax: 952.227.1110 Element to incorporate changes in land uses with the CSAH 61 Corridor. Please review Paris a Recreation the enclosed information pertaining to the proposed City of Chanhassen 2030 Phone:952.227.1120 Comprehensive Plan amendment and provide any comments as soon as possible but no Fax:952.227.1110 later than February 10, 2015. Recreation Center If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 952-227-1139 2310 Coulter Boulevard or email kaanensonna,ci.chanhassen.mn.us as soon as possible. If you have no comments, Phone: 952.227.1400 please check the box below, sign, date, and return this form to me in the enclosed Fax:952.227.1404 envelope at your earliest convenience. Planning ii Natural Resources Thank you for your prompt assistance in this matter. Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax:952.227.1110 Sincerely, Public Works ' / f ' N ' ^ I /� 7901 Park Place �-�( ,'W w. Phone:952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Attachments: Fax:952.227.1110 wows 1. Figure 2-1 Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 2. Figure 2-2 2008-2030 Land Use Consumption 3. CSAH Land Use Amendment Spreadsheet 4. 2030 Land Use Map County Road 61 Current and Proposed Land Use 5. County Road 61 land Use Amendment Parcels Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow December 12, 2014 CITYOF Dr. Dennis Peterson CgMIgASSEN Superintendent Minnetonka School District 276 7700 Market Boulevard 5621 County Road 101 PO Box 147 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Administration Chapter 2 — Land Use, Land Use Map Amendment Phone:952,227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Dear Dr. Peterson: Building Inspections Communities in the metropolitan area must submit proposed comprehensive plan updates Phone: 952.227.1180 to adjacent governments, affected special districts lying in whole or in part within the Fax:952.227.1190 metropolitan area, and affected school districts for review and comment. The purpose of Engineering the notification is to allow interested parties to review and comment on the plan before Phone: 952.227.1160 Metropolitan Council review. The Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook Fax:952.227.1170 advises that such notifications must be distributed 60 days before the plan amendment is sent to the Council for its review. Finance Phone:952.227.1140 The City of Chanhassen is in the process of amending the Land Use Map and Land Use Fax: 952.227.1110 Element to incorporate changes in land uses with the CSAH 61 Corridor. Please review Park & Recreation the enclosed information pertaining to the proposed City of Chanhassen 2030 Phone:952.227.1120 Comprehensive Plan amendment and provide any comments as soon as possible but no Fax: 952.227.1110 later, than February 10, 2015. Recreation Center If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 952-227-1139 2310 Coulter Boulevard or email kaanenson(d),ci.chanhassen.mn.us as soon as possible. If you have no comments, Phone: 27.14040 lease check the box below, sign, date, and return this form to me in the enclosed Fax:952.2271404 p � envelope at your earliest convenience. Planning & Natural Resources Thy you for your prompt assistance in this matter. Phone:952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Sincerely, Works _ 1� 7901 901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Attachments: Fax: 952.227.1110 Website 1. Figure 2-1 Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 2. Figure 2-2 2008-2030 Land Use Consumption 3. CSAH Land Use Amendment Spreadsheet 4. 2030 Land Use Map County Road 61 Current and Proposed Land Use 5. County Road 61 land Use Amendment Parcels Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow December 12, 2014 C OF Ms. Rose Menke l l C&USEN Township Clerk �r� Jackson Township 7700 Market Boulevard 920 Rosewood Circle PO Box147 Shakopee, MN 55379 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Chapter 2 — Land Use, Land Use Map Amendment Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Dear Ms. Menke: Building Inspections Communities in the metropolitan area must submit proposed comprehensive plan updates Phone:952.227.1180 to adjacent governments, affected special districts lying in whole or in part within the Fax: 952.227.1190 metropolitan area, and affected school districts for review and comment. The purpose of Engineering the notification is to allow interested parties to review and comment on the plan before Phone:952.227.1160 Metropolitan Council review. The Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook Fax: 952.227.1170 advises that such notifications must be distributed 60 days before the plan amendment is sent to the Council for its review. Finance Phone:952.227.1140 The City of Chanhassen is in the process of amending the Land Use Map and Land Use Fax:952.227,1110 Element to incorporate changes in land uses with the CSAH 61 Corridor. Please review Park & Recreation the enclosed information pertaining to the proposed City of Chanhassen 2030 Phone:952,227.1120 Comprehensive Plan amendment and provide any comments as soon as possible but no Fax:952.2271110 later than February 10, 2015. Recreation Center If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 952-227-1139 2310 Coulter Boulevard or email kaanenson(a)ci.chanhassen.mn.us as soon as possible. If you have no comments, PFax:952.227.1404 please check the box below, sign, date, and return this form to me in the enclosed Fax: 952.2271404 envelope at your earliest convenience. Planning & Natural Resources Thank you for your prompt assistance in this matter. Phone:952.227.1130 Fax:952,2271110 Sincerely, Public Works NWA/�ak 7901 Park Place G A-4 Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Attachments: Fax:952.2271110 weWe 1. Figure 2-1 Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 2. Figure 2-2 2008-2030 Land Use Consumption 3. CSAH Land Use Amendment Spreadsheet 4. 2030 Land Use Map County Road 61 Current and Proposed Land Use 5. County Road 61 land Use Amendment Parcels Chanhassen is a Community for Life . Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow December 12, 2014 MY l OF Mr. Paul Nelson CgANgASSEN Natural Resources and Environmental Services manager Scott County 7700 Market Boulevard 200 Fourth Avenue West PO Box 147 Shakopee, MN 55379 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Administration Chapter 2 — Land Use, Land Use Map Amendment Phone.952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Dear Mr. Nelson: Building Inspections Communities in the metropolitan area must submit proposed comprehensive plan updates Phone: 952.227.1180 to adjacent governments, affected special districts lying in whole or in part within the Fax:952.227.1190 metropolitan area, and affected school districts for review and comment. The purpose of Engineering the notification is to allow interested parties to review and comment on the plan before Phone:952.227.1160 Metropolitan Council review. The Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook Fax: 952.227.1170 advises that such notifications must be distributed 60 days before the plan amendment is sent to the Council for its review. Finance Phone:952.227.1140 The City of Chanhassen is in the process of amending the Land Use Map and Land Use Fax: 952.227.1110 Element to incorporate changes in land uses with the CSAH 61 Corridor. Please review Park & Recreation the enclosed information pertaining to the proposed City of Chanhassen 2030 Phone:952.227.1120 Comprehensive Plan amendment and provide any comments as soon as possible but no Fax: 952.227.1110 later than February 10, 2015. Recreation Center If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 952-227-1139 2310 Coulter Boulevard or email kaanensonAci.chanhassen.mmus as soon as possible. If you have no comments, PFax:952.2271404 lease check the box below, sign, date, and return this form to me in the enclosed Fax:952.2271404 P envelope at your earliest convenience. Planning 8 Natural Resources Thank you for your prompt assistance in this matter. Phone 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Sincerely, Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Fax:952.227.1310 Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Attachments: Fax:952.227.1110 wel ite 1. Figure 2-1 Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 2• Figure 2-2 2008-2030 Land Use Consumption 3. CSAH Land Use Amendment Spreadsheet 4. 2030 Land Use Map County Road 61 Current and Proposed Land Use 5. County Road 61 land Use Amendment Parcels Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow 0 December 12, 2014 Cl OF Mr. Paul Moline l l CgANgASSEN Planning & Water Management Carver County 7700 Market Boulevard 600 East Fourth Street PO Box 147 Chaska, MN 55318 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Administration Chapter 2 — Land Use, Land Use Map Amendment Phow 952.2271100 Fax:952.227.1110 Dear Mr. Moline: Building Inspections Communities in the metropolitan area must submit proposed comprehensive plan updates Phone:952.227.1180 to adjacent governments, affected special districts lying in whole or in part within the Fax: 952.227.1190 metropolitan area, and affected school districts for review and comment. The purpose of Engineering the notification is to allow interested parties to review and comment on the plan before Phone: 952.227.1160 Metropolitan Council review. The Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook Fax: 952.227.1170 advises that such notifications must be distributed 60 days before the plan amendment is sent to the Council for its review. Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 The City of Chanhassen is in the process of amending the Land Use Map and Land Use Fax:952.227.1110 Element to incorporate changes in land uses with the CSAH 61 Corridor. Please review Park i Recreation the enclosed information pertaining to the proposed City of Chanhassen 2030 Phone:952.227.1120 Comprehensive Plan amendment and provide any comments as soon as possible but no Fax:952.227.1110 later than February 10, 2015. Recreation Center If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 952-227-1139 2310 Coulter Boulevard or email kaanensonAci.chanhassen.mmus as soon as possible. If you have no comments, Phone: 227please check the box below, sign, date, and return this form to me in the enclosed Fax:952.252.2271404 404 envelope at your earliest convenience. Planning & Natural Resources Thank you for your prompt assistance in this matter. Phone:952.227.1130 Fax:952.227.1110 Sincerely, Public Works KOA 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Attachments: Fax: 952.227.1110 weksRe 1. Figure 2-1 Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 2• Figure 2-2 2008-2030 Land Use Consumption 3. CSAH Land Use Amendment Spreadsheet 4. 2030 Land Use Map County Road 61 Current and Proposed Land Use 5. County Road 61 land Use Amendment Parcels Chanhassen is a Community for Life . Providing for Todayand Planning for Tomorrow MY OF CeMSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone:952.227.1180 Fax:952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone:952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952.227.1400 Fax:952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone.952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax:952227.1310 Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us December 12, 2014 Ms. Tara Beard Land Use Manager Hennepin County Housing, Community Works & Transit 701 4th Avenue South Suite 400 Minneapolis, MN 55415-1843 Re: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Chapter 2 — Land Use, Land Use Map Amendment Dear Ms. Beard: Communities in the metropolitan area must submit proposed comprehensive plan updates to adjacent governments, affected special districts lying in whole or in part within the metropolitan area, and affected school districts for review and comment. The purpose of the notification is to allow interested parties to review and comment on the plan before Metropolitan Council review. The Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook advises that such notifications must be distributed 60 days before the plan amendment is sent to the Council for its review. The City of Chanhassen is in the process of amending the Land Use Map and Land Use Element to incorporate changes in land uses with the CSAH 61 Corridor. Please review the enclosed information pertaining to the proposed City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan amendment and provide any comments as soon as possible but no later than February 10, 2015. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 952-227-1139 or email kaanensonAci.chanhassen.mn.us as soon as possible. If you have no comments, please check the box below, sign, date, and return this form to me in the enclosed envelope at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your prompt assistance in this matter. Sincerely, �A NM)z-qq Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Attachments: 1. Figure 2-1 Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages 2. Figure 2-2 2008-2030 Land Use Consumption 3. CSAH Land Use Amendment Spreadsheet 4. 2030 Land Use Map County Road 61 Current and Proposed Land Use 5. County Road 61 land Use Amendment Parcels Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow December 12, 2014 CITY OF Mr. R. Michael Leek C&NUMSEN Community Development Director City of Shakopee 129 South Holmes Street 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Shakopee, MN 55379 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Chapter 2 — Land Use, Land Use Map Amendment Administration Phone 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.2271110 Dear Mr. Leek: Building Inspections Communities in the metropolitan area must submit proposed comprehensive plan updates Phone:952.227,1180 to adjacent governments, affected special districts lying in whole or in part within the Fax: 952.227.1190 metropolitan area, and affected school districts for review and comment. The purpose of the notification is to allow interested parties to review and comment on the plan before Engineering Phone:952.227.1160 Metropolitan Council review. The Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook Fax: 952.227.1170 advises that such notifications must be distributed 60 days before the plan amendment is sent to the Council for its review. Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 The City of Chanhassen is in the process of amending the Land Use Map and Land Use Fax: 952.227.1110 Element to incorporate changes in land uses with the CSAH 61 Corridor. Please review Park & Recreation the enclosed information pertaining to the proposed City of Chanhassen 2030 Phone: 952.227.11210 Comprehensive Plan amendment and provide any comments as soon as possible but no Fax 952.227.1110 later than February 10, 2015. Recreation Center If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 952-227-1139 2310 Coulter Boulevard or email kaanensonaci.chanhassen.mn.us as soon as possible. If you have no comments, Phone: 952.227.1400 please check the box below, sign, date, and return this form to me in the enclosed Fax: 952.2271404 envelope at your earliest convenience. Planning & Natural Resources Thank you for your prompt assistance in this matter. Phone 952.227.1130 Fax:952.227.1110 Sincerely, Public Works 144Ntqumjj�l 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Fax: 952.2271310 Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Attachments: Fax:952.2271110 Website 1. Figure 2-1 Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages www.dohanhassen.mn.us 2. Figure 2-2 2008-2030 Land Use Consumption 3. CSAH Land Use Amendment Spreadsheet 4. 2030 Land Use Map County Road 61 Current and Proposed Land Use 5. County Road 61 land Use Amendment Parcels Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow December 12, 2014 CITY OF Ms. Laurie Hokkanen CBANIIASSEN City Manager City of Victoria 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 36 PO Box 147 Victoria, MN 55386 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Administration Chapter 2 — Land Use, Land Use Map Amendment Phone:952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Dear Ms. Hokkanen: Building Inspections Communities in the metropolitan area must submit proposed comprehensive plan updates Phone: 952.2271180 to adjacent governments, affected special districts lying in whole or in part within the Fax: 952.227.1190 metropolitan area, and affected school districts for review and comment. The purpose of Engineering the notification is to allow interested parties to review and comment on the plan before Phone:952.227.1160 Metropolitan Council review. The Metropolitan Councils Local Planning Handbook Fax:952.227.1170 advises that such notifications must be distributed 60 days before the plan amendment is sent to the Council for its review. Finance Phone:952.227.1140 The City of Chanhassen is in the process of amending the Land Use Map and Land Use Fax: 952.227.1110 Element to incorporate changes in land uses with the CSAH 61 Corridor. Please review Park & Recreation the enclosed information pertaining to the proposed City of Chanhassen 2030 Phone: 952.227.1120 Comprehensive Plan amendment and provide any comments as soon as possible but no Fax: 952.227.1110 later than February 10, 2015. Recreation Center If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 952-227-1139 2310 Coulter Boulevard or email kaanenson(a,ci.chanhassen.mn.us as soon as possible. If you have no comments, Phone:952.227.1400 please check the box below, sign, date, and return this form to me in the enclosed Fax: 952.227.1404 envelope at your earliest convenience. Planning & Natural Resources Thank you for your prompt assistance in this matter. Phone 952.227.1130 Fax 952.227.1110 Sincerely, Public Works n Ms / 7 NV Yq 7901 Park Place �L t �� w �\p�1(,/t,�� Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.2271310 Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Attachments: Fax: 952227.1110 Wehstte 1. Figure 2-1 Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages www.d.chanhassen.mn.us 2. Figure 2-2 2008-2030 Land Use Consumption 3. CSAH Land Use Amendment Spreadsheet 4. 2030 Land Use Map County Road 61 Current and Proposed Land Use 5. County Road 61 land Use Amendment Parcels Chanhassen is a Community for life- Providing forTodayand Planningtor Tomorrow December 12, 2014 CITY OF Mr. Bill Joynes CUANHASSEN City Administrator City of Shorewood 7700 Market Boulevard 5755 Country Club Road PO Box 147 Shorewood, MN 55331 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Administration Chapter 2 — Land Use, Land Use Map Amendment Phone:952.2271100 Fax: 952.2271110 Deaf' Mr. Joynes: Building Inspections Communities in the metropolitan area must submit proposed comprehensive plan updates Phone:952.227.1180 to adjacent governments, affected special districts lying in whole or in part within the Fax: 952.227.1190 metropolitan are a, ea, and affected school districts for review and comment. The purpose of Engineering the notification is to allow interested parties to review and comment on the plan before Phow 952.227.1160 Metropolitan Council review. The Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook Fax: 952.2271170 advises that such notifications must be distributed 60 days before the plan amendment is sent to the Council for its review. Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 The City of Chanhassen is in the process of amending the Land Use Map and Land Use Fax:952.227.1110 Element to incorporate changes in land uses with the CSAH 61 Corridor. Please review Park & Recreation the enclosed information pertaining to the proposed City of Chanhassen 2030 Phone: 952.2271120 Comprehensive Plan amendment and provide any comments as soon as possible but no Fax: 952.227.1110 later than February 10, 2015. Recreation Center If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 952-227-1139 2310 Coulter Boulevard or email kaanensonla,ci.chanhassen.mn.us as soon as possible. If you have no comments, Phone:52.227.1404 lease check the box below, sign, date, and return this form to me in the enclosed Fax:952.227.1404 p envelope at your earliest convenience. Planning & Natural Resources 'Thank you for your prompt assistance in this matter. Phone:952.227.1130 Fax:952,227.1110 Sincerely, Public Works Place 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Senior Center Phone:952.2271125 Attachments: Fax:952.2271110 weksite 1. Figure 2-1 Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 2• Figure 2-2 2008-2030 Land Use Consumption 3. CSAH Land Use Amendment Spreadsheet 4. 2030 Land Use Map County Road 61 Current and Proposed Land Use 5. County Road 61 land Use Amendment Parcels Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Figure 2-1. LAND USE TABLE IN 5-YEAR STAGES Existing and Planned Land Use Table (in acres) __ AllowedrtYR811Ye > - s,222lk Residential Land Uses Low Density Residential(developed) 1.2 4 2,600 3,100 3,913 4,498 4,540 4,692 2,092 Low Density Residential (vacant) 2,102 1,602 779 201 152 - Medium Density Residential (developed) 4 8 155 300 326 356 381 496 341 Medium Density Residential (vacant) 245 100 170 140 115 - High Density Residential (developed) 8 16d240 112 140 180 195 240 185 High Density Residential (vacant) 106 100 53 45 - Mixed Use Primarily Residential' (developed) 8 20 40 45 50 60 72 42 Mined Use Primarily Residential' (vacant) 10 27 22 12 C/I Land Uses Est. Employees/Acre Commercial (developed) 25 270 300 318 320 328 88 Commercial (vacant) 58 28 10 8 - Industrial (developed) 7 500 632 760 801 813 843 343 Industrial (vacant) 1 383 251 83 42 30 - Office(developed) 28 240 260 242 263 272 277 37 Office (vacant) 99 79 35 14 5 - Mixed Use Pnmanly C/I' (developed) 26 35 40 45 1 55 60 72 37 Mixed Use Primarily C/I' (vacant) 30 25 27 17 12 1 - Extractive - Public/Semi Public Land Uses Institutional 1,213 1,213 1,213 1,213 1.213 1,213 - Parks and Recreation 417 430 438 457 457 457 40 Open Space 9341 934 9" 944 S44 944 10 Roadway Rights of Way 1,237 1,237 1 1,237 1.237 1,237 1,237 - utility Railroad Airport Subtotal Seweredl Rural Residential 2.5 acres or less 1 10,786 10,799 10,852 10,877 1 10,871 10,871 3,215 - Rural Residential 2.5 -10 acres 2.5 na 971 971 901 948 948 948 (23) Rural Residential 10-40 acres - Agricultural 40- acres 40 27 19 - - - (40) Agriculture land use 904 904 882 882 882 882 (22) Subtotal Unsewered 1.915 1,902 1,849 1,830 1,830 1.830 (85) Undeveloped Wetlands (within land use designations) 2,210 2,210 2,210 2.210 2.210 2,210 - Open Water, Rivers and Streams 2,059 2.059 2,059 2.059 2,059 2,059 - Totall 14,760 1 14,760 14,760 1 14,760 14,760 14,760 3,130 G:\PLAN\2008 Comp PlanWmendments\Land Use Map\CSAH 61\Land Use 5 year revised CSAH 61.As August 2, 2005 Figure 2-2 2008 - 2030 Land Use Comparison 2020 2030 Land Use Plan Land Use Plan Change 2020-2030 Land Use Acres Percent Acres Percent Acres Commercial 142 1.2% 328 2.2% 186 Office/Industrial 694 5.7% 843 5.7% 149 Office 114 0.9% 277 1.9% 163 Parks & Open Space 1,297 10.6%1 1,401 9.5% 104 Public/Semi-Public 1,204 9.9% 1,210 8.2% 6 Residential Large Lot 870 7.1% 948 6.40/6 78 Residential Low Density 3,295 27.0% 4,692 31.8% 1,397 Residential Medium Density 219 1.8% 496 3.4% 277 Residential High Density 120 1.0% 240 1.6% 120 Mixed Use 51 0.4% 144 1.0% 93 Undevelopable 4,200 34.4% 4181 28.3% 19 TOTAL 12,206 14,760 2,554 Undevelopabie Lakes, Floodplain, Rivers, Streams 2,037 Road Right -of -Way 1,237 Agricufture 882 TOTAL 4,156 G',`FIAM2008 Comb %enNmeMmeMSLLmb Uu MICMH 61V use comPar. 2006-2000 Al M1I2014 CSAH 61 Land Use Amendment CSAH 61 Corridor Citywide Land Use Existing ac. Change ac.) Proposed ac. Percent Existing ac. Amended ac. Percent Agricultural 846.8273 -22.31 824.5173 65.6% 4,200 4,177,69 28.3% Office 158.6151 -58.15 100.4651 8.0% 335 276.85 1.9% Office -Industrial 81.9244 -40.05 41.8744 3.3% 883 842.95 5.7% Parks & Open Space 41.8188 10.71 52.5288 4.2%1 1,391 11401.71 9.5% Mixed Use 0 28.77 28.77 2.3% 115 143.77 1.0% Residential Large Lot 38.9997 -23.3141 15.6856 1.2% 971 947.69 6.4% Residential Low Density 20.3766 0.001 20.3776 1.6% 4,694 4,694.00 31.8% Residential Medium Density 0 89.75 89.75 7.1 % 406 495.75 3.4% Residential High Density 67.2983 14.95 82.2483 6.5% 225 239.95 1.6% Commercial 0 01 01 01 328 328.00 2.2% Public/Semi-Public 0 0 01 01 1,212 1 1,212.00 8.2% Total 1,255.86 0.3569 1,256.22 1 100%1 14,760 1 14,760 100% G:\PLAN\61 Corridor Study\61 land use existing and proposed.xis December 12, 2014 CITYO � F Ms. Janet Jeremiah Co mumty Development Director Cllnllil[fA Cityof Eden Prairie 8080 Mitchell Road 7700 Market Boulevard Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Chapter 2 — Land Use, Land Use Map Amendment Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax:952.227.1110 Dear Ms. Jeremiah: Building Inspections Communities in the metropolitan area must submit proposed comprehensive plan updates Phone:952.227.1180 to adjacent governments, affected special districts lying in whole or in part within the Fax:952.227.1190 metropolitan area, and affected school districts for review and comment. The purpose of the notification is to allow interested parties to review and comment on the plan before Engineering 7.1 Metropolitan Council review. The Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook Phone:952.227.1160 Fax. 952.227.1170 advises that such notifications must be distributed 60 days before the plan amendment is sent to the Council for its review. Finance Phone:952.227.1140 The City of Chanhassen is in the process of amending the Land Use Map and Land Use Fax: 952.2271110 Element to incorporate changes in land uses with the CSAH 61 Corridor. Please review the enclosed information pertaining to the proposed City of Chanhassen 2030 Park :Recreation Comprehensive Plan amendment and provide an comments as soon as Phone: 952.2271120 � P Y possible but no Fax: 952.227.1110 later than February 10, 2015. Recreation Center If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 952-227-1139 2310 Coulter Boulevard or email kaanensonAci.chanhassen.mn.us as soon as possible. If you have no comments, Phone: 952.227.1400 please check the box below, sign, date, and return this form to me in the enclosed Fax: 952.227.1404 envelope at your earliest convenience. Planning & Natural Resources Thank you for your prompt assistance in this matter. Phone: 952.2271130 Fax:952.2271110 Sincerely, Public Works 7901 Park Place Phone:952.227.1300 Fax: 952.2271310 Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Attachments: Fax:952.2271110 Website 1. Figure 2-1 Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages www.ci.chanhassen.ni 2. Figure 2-2 2008-2030 Land Use Consumption 3. CSAH Land Use Amendment Spreadsheet 4. 2030 Land Use Map County Road 61 Current and Proposed Land Use 5. County Road 61 land Use Amendment Parcels Chanhassen is a Community for life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow �®'op I N��` \� d�IlI�� IIII'► ( lox �E ©III I OWN II% ENV Mi z 1 10 191 County Road 61 Land Use Amendment Parcels Map Groa PID Tax yer Name Taxpayer Address Taxpayer City -State -Zip Property Address 77TExisting Land Use Proposed Land Use IGIS Acres Gross Notes Net acres I 250340100 GARY W DUNGEY 1539 INDEPENDENCE AVE CHASKA, MN 55318-1665 1850 FLYING CLOUD DR loffice lResidentiall Office Office Medium Density 1 Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density 7.4 7.4 I 250340200 EDWARD A KOCOUREK 3804 22ND AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407-30 1800 FLYING CLOUD DR 1.22 1.22 I 250340400 HIGH TERRACE LLC PO BOX 260 CHASKA, MN 5531 M260 30.86 30.86 I 250350100 HIGH TERRACE LLC PO BOX 260 CHASKA, MN 55318-0260 1350 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Residential Medium Density 8.15 8.5 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 250350110 HIGH TERRACE LLC 250340420 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 250350111 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 250350112 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 250351000 LOUISE E ZAMJAHN ETAL 250351100 CHANHASSEN CITY 250350500 HAROLD F HESSE PO BOX 260 500 LAFAYETTE RD 500 LAFAYETTE RD 500 LAFAYETTE RD 7506 77TH ST PO BOX 147 1425 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 55318-0260 ST PAUL, MN 551554045 ST PAUL, MN 551554045 ST PAUL, MN 551554045 CHASKA, MN 55318-9600 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0147 CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 1201 BLUFF CREEK DR Office Office Industrial Office Office Office Office Industrial Agricultural Estate Residential Medium Density Parks & Open Space Parks & Open Space Parks & Open Space Parks & Open Space Parks & Open Space Residential Medium Density 11.23 7.98 82.2 11.18 5.06 0.92 20.54 wetland 20 acres 11.33 0 0 0 5.06 0.92 20 3 250350800 JAMES ROBERT SKAGGS 1190 TWIN PEAKS CIR LONGMONT, CO 80503-2170 1161 BLUFF CREEK DR Residential Large Lot Residential Medium Density 1.09 1.09 4 250350500 HAROLD F HESSE 1425 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 1201 BLUFF CREEK DR Agricultural Estate Residential Medium Density 5.88 5.88 4 250350700 BRIAN J JOHNSON 1190 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 1190 BLUFF CREEK DR Office Residential Medium Density 3.33 3.3 5 250351300 SKIP S COOK 15506 VILLAGE WOODS DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-14 780 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Industrial Mixed 2.14 2.14 5 25035I710 CHRISTOPHER HAGEN 850 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9503 850 FLYING CLOUD DR Office _ _ _ _ Office Mixed Mixed 8.12 8 5 250351810 SKIP S COOK 15506 VILLAGE WOODS DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-14 10551 GREAT PLAINS Big 2.88 2.88 6 256010010 PCH DEVELOPMENT LLC 10500 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA, MN 55318-9470 10500 GREAT PLAINS BLVD -Ofice Industrial Mixed 2.88 2.88 6 256010020 PCH DEVELOPMENT LLC 250360500 CHANHASSEN CITY 2503607001 BEATRICE I ZMERS IRREV 411111 2503607101 LONNIE FORD 250361000 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 250361300 J T INVESTMENTS LLC 250362800 MICHAEL S SPIESS 250363100 ALVIN R LEBENS 257980010 P R KELLY PROPERTIES LLC 250361100 THE WESTERN MOTEL LLC 250363700 LARRY HOPFENSPIRGER 250363000 Lavonne S Dalhnan 10500 GREAT PLAINS BLVD PO BOX 147 DEUCE RD 1450 FLYING CLOUD DR 500 LAFAYETTE RD 18020 BEAVER HILLS LN 470 FLYING CLOUD DR 460 FLYING CLOUD DR 1550 FLYING CLOUD DR 15506 VILLAGE WOODS DR 2720 QUAKER IN N P O Box 285 CHASKA, MN 55318-9470 10520 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0147 ELKO, MN 55020-9591 1220 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 1450 FLYING CLOUD DR ST PAUL, MN 551554030 CEDAR FALLS, IA 50613-939 608 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 470 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 460 FLYING CLOUD DR ICHASKA, MN 55318-9502 1550 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-14575 FLYING CLOUD DR PLYMOUTH, MN 55441-3285 615 FLYING CLOUD DR Shakopee, MN 55379 285 Flying Cloud Drive Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Industrial Office Industrial Mixed Residential High Density Residential High Density Residential High Density Residential High Density Residential High Density Residential High Density Residential High Density Residential High Density Parks & Open Space Parks & Open Space Parks & Open Space 9.99 2.35 5.29 0.911 0.24 1.99 0.6 0.61 4.87 1.88 0.53 5.21 247.53 9.99 2.35 5.29 7 7 34.68 total ac., bluff and creek 12 1 7 0.91 7 0 7 1.99 7 0.6 7 0.61 7 4.87 8 1.88 8 0.53 9 3 143.48 G:\PLAN\61 Corridor Study\amendment parcels.xls Mr. Bill Joynes - City of Shorewood December 12, 2014 Page 2 City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use Map Amendments n I acknowledge receipt of the above cited comprehensive plan update notification 5"�224 and waive further review/comment on the amendment. Signature / Date Printed Title RETURN THIS PAGE RECEIVED JAN 0 9 2015 Mr. Paul Nelson - Scott County December 12, 2014 Page 2 City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use Map Amendments dI acknowledge receipt of the above cited comprehensive plan update notification and waive further review/comment on the amendment. �I 2 - LZ �/�/�i � Signature Date ,^n , R-&/ l iyi✓ Tkokiih4 I'✓ICCNCr4Pi Printed Name Title RETURN THIS PAGE Dr. James Bauck - Eastern Carver County School District December 12, 2014 Page 2 City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use Map Amendments PPI acknowledge receipt of the above cited comprehensive plan update notification and waive further review/comment on the amendment. 7 / Signature Date Printed Name 'Pule RETURN THIS PAGE Ms. Laurie Hokkanen - City of Victoria December 12, 2014 Page 2 City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use Map Amendments 190000 I acknowledge receipt of the above cited comprehensive plan update notification and waive further review/comment on the amendment. Signature Date Printed Name RETURN THIS PAGE CITYUCHANHANEN RECEIVED ULU z ? 2014 Ms. Janet Jeremiah - City of Eden Prairie December 12, 2014 Page 2 City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use Map Amendments RrI acknowledge receipt of the above cited comprehensive plan update notification and waive further review/comment on the amendment. r>rl Si tore Date Printed Name RETURN THIS PAGE CITYOFC'INVASSEN RECEIVED JAN 0 2 2011 INVIHASSEN PANNING IIEPT Mr. Tod Sherman - MN Dept. of Transportation December 12, 2014 Page 2 City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use Map Amendments RrI acknowledge receipt of the above cited comprehensive plan update notification and waive further review/comment on the amendment. l2-Z7-lY 'cSigb a e Date ToO ,SNERM141V PLANNiNC Sc/PG�t Viry t Printed Name Title RETURN THIS PAGE Mr. R. Michael Leek - City of Shakopee December 12, 2014 Page 2 City of Chanhassen CSAH 61 Corridor Land Use Map Amendments 19 I acknowledge receipt of the above cited comprehensive plan update notification and waive further review/comment on the amendment. Signature Date Printed Name Title RETURN THIS PAGE RECEIVED JAN 2 8 2015 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Markel Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN by"yAssFH Lavonne S Dc P O Box 285 Shakoree, W 1+7 TFt tJ EA�[z4_TS PM L y�PSFS PAST `M � VITMFY BOWES 02 1 P $ 000.480 0003195036 JAN 092015 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 55317 NIXIE 553 SE 1009 0001/14/15 RE-1OR14 TO SE74DER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 55317014747 *Z378-06846-09-38 ril#l19ll1ir9Eia1ll9 SE;3 r7 �?�7 liurlrl�ii�ll�lriirril�ilrul�il,lEr�l�li9.l ��r Y January 9, 2015\� CITY OF CENSEN LAVONNE S DALLMAN 7700 Market Boulevard 215 FLYING CLOUD DR PO Box CHASKA, MN 55318 Chanhassen, MNN 55317 Re: 2030 Comprehensive Plan — Land Use Map Amendment Administration Property Address: 215 FLYING CLOUD DR Phone:952.227.1100 pID: 250363000 Fax:952.2271110 Building Inspections Dear LAVONNE S DALLMAN: Phone:952.227.1180 Fax: 952,227.1190 In 2014, the City of Chanhassen undertook a County Road 61 Corridor Plan Study. The City of Chanhassen initiated the County Road 61 Corridor Plan to investigate Engineering future land use transitions for the study area to arrive upon recommendations Fax:952.2271170 PFax:952.227.1170 consistent with the gateway's importance. This study provides a framework plan that will guide future public and private sector decision -making, shaping this important Finance city gateway. The study can be reviewed on the city's website at Phone:952.2271140 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/6lcorridor. Fax: 952.2271110 City staff has been directed to initiate the public hearing process to implement the Park Recreation27.120 land use recommendations contained within the County Road 61 Corridor Plan. Your : Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax:952.227.1110 property is recommended to amend the land use from Office Industrial to Parks & p y Oven Space. Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard A public hearing is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on February 3, 2015 in the Chanhassen Phone: 952.227.1400 City Council Chamber in the lower level of City Hall at 7700 Market Boulevard. The Fax: 952.227.1404 staff report for this hearing, when completed, can be viewed on the city's website at Planning a www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/PCAizendas. You are encouraged to attend this meeting. Natural Resources The amendments are then scheduled for review by the City Council on February 23, Phone:952.227.1130 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in the Chanhassen City Council Chamber. Fax:952.2271110 If you have any questions, would like additional information or would like to meet to Public Works discuss this, please contact me at (952) 227-1139 or kaanenson( ,ci.chanhassen.mn.us 7901 Park Place or Bob Generous, Senior Planner, at (952) 227-1131 or Phone:952.2271300 Fax:952,227.1310 bgeneroustu'%ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Senior Center Sincerely, Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 � KAx ^ ^ ^, n `` We tB www.ci.chanhassen,mn.us Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow January 9, 2015 CITY OF CUMINSEN Lavonne S Dallman 7700 Market Boulevard P O Box 285 PBox 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Shakopee,MN 55379 Re: 2030 Comprehensive Plan — Land Use Map Amendment Administration Prop Address: 285 Flying Cloud Drive PFax:952.227.11100 PID: 250363000 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Dear Lavonne S Dallman: Phone:952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 In 2014, the City of Chanhassen undertook a County Road 61 Corridor Plan Study. The City of Chanhassen initiated the County Road 61 Corridor Plan to investigate Engineering future land use transitions for the study area to arrive upon recommendations Phone:952.2271160 Fax:952.227.1170 consistent with the gateway's importance. This study provides a framework plan that will guide future public and private sector decision -making, shaping this important Finance city gateway. The study can be reviewed on the city's website at Phone:952,227,1140 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/6lcorridor. Fax:952.227.1110 City staff has been directed to initiate the public hearing process to implement the Park Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 land use recommendations contained within the CountyRoad 61 Corridor Plan. Your Fax: 952.227.1110 property is recommended to amend the land use from Office Industrial to Parks & Open Space. Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard A public hearing is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on February 3, 2015 in the Chanhassen Phone:952.227.1400 City Council Chamber in the lower level of City Hall at 7700 Market Boulevard. The Fax: 952.22T1404 staff report for this hearing, when completed, can be viewed on the city's website at Planning & www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/PCAgendas. You are encouraged to attend this meeting. Natural Resources The amendments are then scheduled for review by the City Council on February 23, Phone: 952.227.1130 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in the Chanhassen City Council Chamber. Fax: 952.227.1110 If you have any questions, would like additional information or would like to meet to Public works discuss this, please contact me at (952) 227-1139 or kaanensonAci.chanhassen.mn.us 7Park Place or Bob Generous, Senior Planner, at (952) 227-1131 or Phone: 952.2271300 Phone: Fax:952.227.1310 bgenerous(&ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Senior Center Sincerely, Phone:952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Kac � n �l/,m \ Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Development Director Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow * MEMORANDUM CITY OF TO: Planning Commission CWNSEN FROM: Planning Staff Ole 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 DATE: January 20, 2015 Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJ: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Administration Phone:952.2271100 BACKGROUND Fax: 952.2271110 Building Inspections On December 1, 2014 in a joint meeting with the Planning Commission, the County Phone:952.227.1180 Road 61 Corridor Plan study(www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/6lcorridor) was presented to Fax: 952.227.1190 City Council. As a result of the study, staff was directed to initiate the Comprehensive Plan amendment process to incorporate the land use Engineering Phone:952227.1160 recommendations contained within the study. The City held two open houses to Fax: 952.227.1170 review the corridor: August 6, 2014 and May 22, 2014. Finance On December 12, 2014, the city distributed for jurisdictional review the proposed Phone:952.227.1140 land use amendments. The jurisdictional review period ends on February 10, 2015. Fax:952.227.1110 Park & Recreation This item is scheduled for a public hearing on February 3, 2015. Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax:952,227.1110 DISCUSSION Recreation Center The City has sent letters to all the property owners within the corridor whose land is 2310 Coulter Boulevard proposed for an amendment. Additionally, the City will be mailing public hearing Phone:952.227.1400 notices to all properties that were notified as part of the corridor study process. This Fax: 952.227.1404 includes properties that would normally be outside the notification area for public Planning & hearings. Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Staff is dividing the land use amendment into nine different groupings as highlighted Fax: 952 2271110 in the attached spreadsheet and land use map. Each property will be individually reviewed as part of the staff report. Some of the properties have more detailed Public Works development scenerios, which were developed in conjunction with the County Road 7901 Park Place 61 Corridor Plan. Phone:952.227,1300 Fax:952.227.1310 Staff is seeking input on any suggestions to facilitate the hearing process. Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 ATTACHMENTS Fax:952.227-1110 Website 1. Sample Property Owner Letter. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 2. Parcel Spreadsheet. 3. Land Use Map — Existing and Proposed. \\Cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\plan\2008 comp plan\amendmenuIand use map\csah 611proems memo.doc SCANNED Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow January 9, 2015 CITY OF «Taxpayer Name» PO Box 147 77oo Boulevard «Taxpayer- Address» PO Bo Chanhassen, MN 55317 «Taxpayer_CityStateZipv Re: 2030 Comprehensive Plan — Land Use Map Amendment Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Property Address: <d'roperty_Address» Fax:952.2271110 PID: «PID» Building Inspections Dear (!Taxpayer Namew Phone:952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 In 2014, the City of Chanhassen undertook a County Road 61 Corridor Plan Study. The City of Chanhassen initiated the County Road 61 Corridor Plan to investigate Engineering Phone:952.227.1160 future land use transitions for the study area to arrive upon recommendations Fax: 952.227.1170 consistent with the gateway's importance. This study provides a framework plan that will guide future public and private sector decision -making, shaping this important Floance city gateway. The study can be reviewed on the city's website at Phow952.227.1140 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/6lcorridor. Fax:952.2271110 Park & Recreation City staff has been directed to initiate the public hearing process to implement the Phone. 952.227.1120 land use recommendations contained within the County Road 61 Corridor Plan. Your Fax:952.227.1110 property is recommended to amend the land use from ((Existing Land Use» to ((Proposed Land Usew Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard A public hearing is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on February 3, 2015 in the Chanhassen Phone: 952.227.1400 City Council Chamber in the lower level of City Hall at 7700 Market Boulevard. The Fax:952.227.1404 staff report for this hearing, when completed, can be viewed on the city's website at Planning & v'ww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/PCAgendas. You are encouraged to attend this meeting. Natural Resources The amendments are then scheduled for review by the City Council on February 23, Phone:952.227.1130 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in the Chanhassen City Council Chamber. Fax: 952.227.1110 If you have any questions, would like additional information or would like to meet to Public Works discuss this, please contact me at (952) 227-1139 or kaanenson( ,ci.chanhassen.mn.us 7Park Place e: Phone: 952.227.1300 or Bob Generous, Senior Planner, at 952 227-1131 or () Fax:952.227.1310 bgenerousaa ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Senior Center Sincerely, Phone:952.227.1125 Kate Aanenson, AICP Fax: 952.227.1110 Community Development Director Websfte www.ci.chanhassefl.mn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow • County Road 61 Land Use Amendment Parcels 40 Ma Groa PID Taxpayer Name Taxpayer Address Tu a er City -State -Zip, Property Address JExisting Land Use Proposed Laod Use GIS Acres Gross Notes Net acres I 250340100 GARY W DUNGEY 1539 INDEPENDENCE AVE CHASKA, MN 55318-1665 1850 FLYING CLOUD DR loffice Office Office Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Medium Density 1 7.4 7.4 1 250340200 EDWARD A KOCOUREK 3804 22ND AVE S MINNEAPOUS, MN 55407-30 1800 FLYING CLOUD DR 1.22 1.22 1 250340400 HIGH TERRACE LLC PO BOX 260 CHASKA, MN 55318-0260 N/A 30.86 30.86 1 250350100 HIGH TERRACE LLC PO BOX 260 CHASKA, MN 55318-0260 1350 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Residential Medium Density 8.15 8.5 1 250350110 HIGH TERRACE LUC PO BOX 260 CHASKA, MN 55318-0260 N/A loffice lResidential Medium Density 11 11 2 250340420 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 500 LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL, MN 55155-4045 N/A Office Industrial Parks & Open Space 7.98 2 250350111 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 500 LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL, MN 55155-4045 N/A Office Parks & Open Space 92.2 2 250350112 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 500 LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL, MN 551554045 N/A Office Parks & Open Space 11.18 2 250351000 LOUISE E ZAMIAHN EFAL 7506 77TH ST CHASKA, MN 55318-9600 N/A Office Parks & Open Space 5.06 2 250351100 CHANHASSEN CITY PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-01•N/A Office Industrial Parks & Open Space 0.92 3 250350500 HAROLD F HESSE 1425 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 1201 BLUFF CREEK DR Agiricultural Estate lResidential Medium Density 20.54 wetland 20 acres 11.33 0 0 0 5.06 0.92 20 3 250350800 LAMES ROBERT SKAGGS 1190 TWIN PEAKS CHL LONGMONT, CO 80503-2170 1161 BLUFF CREEK DR Residential Large Lot Resideatial Medium Density 1.09 1.09 4 250350500 HAROID F HESSE 1425 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 1201 BLUFF CREEK DR Agincultand Estate - Residential Medium Density 5.88 5.88 4 250350700 BRIAN J JOHNSON 1190 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9515 1190 BLUFF CREEK DR Office Residential Medium Density 3.33 3.3 5 250351300 SKIP S COOK 15506 VILLAGE WOODS DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-14 780 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Industrial Mixed 2.14 2.14 5 250351710 CHRISTOPHER HAGEN 850 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9503 850 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Mixed 10551 GREAT PLAINS BLVD Office Mixed 8.12 8 5 250351810 SKIP S COOK 15506 VILLAGE WOODS DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-14 2.88 2.98 6 256010010 PCH DEVELOPMENT LLC 10500 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA, MN 55318-9470 10500 GREAT PLAINS BLVD Office Industrial Mixed 2.88 2.88 6 256010020 PCH DEVELOPMENT LLC 10500 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHASKA, MN 55318-9470 10520 GREAT PLAINS BLVD Office Industrial Mixed 9.99 250360500 CHANHASSEN CITY PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-01•N/A Office Industrial Residential High Density 2.35 250360700 BEATRICE 1 ZWIERS IRREV TR 11111 DEUCE RD EIRO, MN 55020-9591 220 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Industrial Residential High Density 5.29 250360710 LONNIE FORD 450 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 450 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Industrial Residential High Density 0.91 250361000 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 500 LAFAYE FE RD ST PAUL, MN 55155-1030 N/A Office Residential High Density 0.24 250361300 1 T INVESTMENTS LLC 8020 BEAVFLL HILLS IN CEDAR FALLS, IA 50613-939 608 FLYLG CLOUD DR Office Industrial Residential High Densi 1.99 250362500 MICHAEL S SPIESS 470 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 470 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Industrial Residential High Density1 0.6 250363100 ALVIN R IEBENS 1460 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9533 1460 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Residential High Density 0.61 257980010 P R KELLY PROPERTIES LLC 1550 FLYING CLOUD DR ICHASKA, MN 55318-9502 J550 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Industrial Residential High Density 1 4.87 250361100 THE WESTERN MOTEL TLC 15506 VILLAGE WOODS DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-14:575 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Industrial Parks & Open Space 1.88 250363700 TARRY HOPFENSPIRGER 2720 QUAKER LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55441-3285 615 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Industrial Parks & Open Space 0.53 250363000 lavonne S Dallman P O Box 285 Shalmpm, MN 55379 285 Flying Cloud hive Office Industrial Parks & Open Space 5.21 247.53 Pro erties in Corridor no land use changed proposed: 9.99 2.35 5.29 7 7 34.68 total ac., bluff and creek 12 7 0.91 7 0 7 1.99 7 0.6 7 0.61 7 4.87 8 1.88 8 0.53 9 3 143.48 NA 250351200 RSS Golf ILL: 825 Flying0oud Drive Chaska, MN 55318 825 Flying Cloud Dr Office NC 2100 STOUGHTON AVE Office Industrial Office Industrial 1875 FLYING CLOUD DR Office Industrial NC 1900 STOUGHTON AVE Office Industrial NC 1805 STOUGHTON AVE Office Industrial Office Industrial 100 FLYING CLOUD DR High Density NC 98.00 MN River Fkwd Plain 6 acres uplav 6.00 NA 250030700 STOUGHTON AVENUE vENTu 102 JONATHAN BLVD N STE 200 CHASKA, MN 55318-2383 21.22 Gedney Pickles 10 acres red -clop 10 NA 250340110 GARY W DUNGEY 1539 INDEPENDENCE AVE CHASKA, MN 55318-1665 9.47 9.47 NA 250340120 TWIN CITIES SELF STORAGE, 607 WASHINGTON AVE S STE 503 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415-11 6.82 possible redevelopment site 6.82 NA 250340300 CARLTON J SOLBERG 1805 STOUGHTON AVE CHASKA, MN 55318-2215 0.31 0.31 NA 250360200 BEATRICE I ZWIERS 11111 DEUCE RD ELKO, MN 55020-8001 35.88 Bluff only 14 acres buildable 14 NA 25036 9900 DAN & VAIERIE TESTER 230 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9532 230 FLYING CLOUD DR lHighDens' NC 0.44 0.44 NA 250363200 SRIKONFORT MN LLC 15582 LILAC DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347 250 FLYING CLOUD DR Hi Dens' NC 0.75 0.75 NA 250363300 STEVEN JON & ANGELA S S 240 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9532 240 FLYING CLOUD DR High DensityINC 0.66 0.66 I73.55 48.45 G:\PLAN\61 Corridor Study\amendment parcels.xls County Road 61 Corridor Study Current Legend COMMERICAL OFFICE OFFICE INDUSTRIAL MIXED RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY AGRICULTURE PARKS OPEN SPACE PUBLIC SEMI PUBLIC 2030 Landuse 01 \mWm V t C; C V K. C <t t V V C. Itt V V V Ic% V V Ict V V V c; K. Ic. r., Ict C ft C qc Ic IZ• Ic C. C. K. C. Kt V Ict C c> Vmbf 11111, 1AIMP-PioWl A f: C% 4t Oct <t 4. It C% :t Ic ct 'It% ft C:'C C C" It. c- Ict C% C. ft r% Ic, Ic, Ic, ft it. C:' dy c c 1;-. ;t 4� ct C c C.. c C. C. ;I ct C. c C lc� IV* Ic, C C% Ic% C C. ct 0 1;t C.- C. 1c. c. c I;t c` C. C. c C> C.- County Road 61 Corridor Study E Rice Lake OHW 699.2 Rice Lake OH 699.2 Proposed Landuse