The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-09_PETERSON PROPERTYCis= �I Page 1 of 1 Hoffman, Todd From: Paul Bilotta [pbilotta@hmidevelopment.com) Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 2:38 PM To: Hoffman, Todd r,16 Cc: johnchadwick@chadwickland.com 1 Subject: Purchase price Attachments: Purchase price per acre.xls; Purchase Agreement Executed 7-18-06.pdf; Pioneer Pass - Second Amendment 7-28-06.pdf; PA 2-Page.pdf Todd, Unfortunately, we did end up selling the property for less than we had it under contract with DR Horton. Attached are documents that show the new purchase price of $182,781.46 per acre (see attached spreadsheet). The contract is long and confusing because there was a lot of renegotiation with the buyer and they only purchased part of the Peterson property, not the entire parcel. I have attached the entire contract for your use, but for simplicity's sake, I have also included a scan of the two pages that have the key information on them (what was purchased and for how much). Please let me know if you need anything else or have any questions. Thanks, Paul Bilotta 11/27/2006 Knoblauch Offer Purchase Price 6,900,000 Land Area Single Family Lots 28.11 Subdivision Streets 8.21 Outlots E & F 1.43 Total purchased acreage 37.75 Purchase price per acre 182,781.46 Acreage per James R. Hill, Engineers 17. Is. is. W. 21. 22. 23. 24_ 25. 26. 27. 28. WewlgNe Co. • St. Part. MN f611A}.1988 Form 1519A 18,2 PURCHASE AGREEMENT This fqm approved by IN Mimemta Aseofiwlon of REALTORS-, wN.h duchums any Liability ads'vq out of use or misuse o1 this form. 0 2004, Minnesota Naoeistbn OI f1EALTORSO. Edit., MN J. Dake May____-2(06 2. Page 1 of .._____�___..._.-.. Pages RECENED OF the sum of OneHundred Thousand and 00/100-------------------------- a.m. (1 100, 000.00---- i by V CHECK G CASH ❑ NOTE as gamut merwy to be dapedted rpon acagaM of ruaq..ee Agreement Was Noma. a on -- 1.0 canal help,. ON, third WMMss day Nter *swot . In ON cost 0. el led, b irow hurt W N returned to Buyer If PurckMse Agreement b net +caged by Bober. Said eamaw money I. pan Wear,., far Me WrMY..1 IN poDanY lee nap at: Buss, Atldaas: city of CMnhasaenCo rmy of 29161mer _____,_ ____,_. , State of Minnesota. LeaMda.dhed u: 1L11 9 ng}rZ fas �lo4H and _Ou_Slots 9_and _P, as shown. on. LhB. Preliminary gartlen Wlbw plants: shrubs and mass: sm,m each: Oqm bier,.; ,crone and awnings: window sMdes; blind a and certain and d.ary obis; attached Ightinp lixsun, aN bulbs: pbmbirp Ibturn; water Maur. Mnglp DI any urn,,., tens,, ,load,..J"-'t olha anuipment uud in connection iharawlthl: builtin sup<onstionirp awper", to en Igtw: water mttener0OWNEIi%tENTECONONE; it :'L war Wih-w humidifier •red Son umidifteo lipoid ga tank • a 01 IM p,operty .I Selbp; .ump pump: •pacMd..levisb. Ohl.... wblt TV lack, area wbbg: BUILRI wsS sge disposals; trash compactors; ovens: uobloD Stoves; microwave ovens; Mod lane; ATTACKED: carpeting; m9rgq gar•pe door opens,. and MI wmn.1,; ..it. dolscbr.: Ii,.pMc. aSI.ee: NI of which property Seller has this day9 000 000_ 0---- -------=-�----�= 1 agraetl to say to Buyer Iq sum of lf_i._y__•�� .�.___._____.._..... _ which Buyer sprees To pay in the lolbwing m..a,/enlN, money, and linarcinB, IN total amount secured scouter this Such ImeduciN will be Ichack ono) [� 29. f% dafewFsloaing.eMa 30. iHirParcN.Mg,www 31. if answer Is IS NOT, the 31 This Purchan Aprnme 33. (II +newer is IS, sold 3aP. A . Maso �yrr ogreet 35 . Ste` 35. This Purchaas Ageemr IS is Fugen . a Vacant Land AdrkMun. fit answer is IS, sae eDacned Addr�e em.l Buyer has be -Idwc I- 1). uverS-aaeenu. - Weak-) - 38. or eac ass when closed 39. OEED/MARKETABLE nTtE: Upon a,lgmeee by B.Yer. SeYer .MIL dekver a❑ Warre,ty Deetl �xAl]DK}KXXXYXvvy VTrTyAs[DL 40. pined in by aMo... if any. ..,I, markeubN title, eublect to: ..N.k are, at. (A) bueJl and boning laws, oudlnences, stela and ledeul s,Ir(ion,: (81 sanctions relating to use or improvement of the pmadY without e2. effective forfeiture provisions: ICI eserv.ipn of any mINSI Nine by IN Star. of Minnesota; IDS utility er10 drNnape easements which Eo not 43. interiors with ebsli,q knprovsr,MnU: (El dgMs of tenants as follow. (tames, specified, not subject to tenancia0: None: EJ City p-L. as, Chanhassen cond qi one for Ei not Dlat app;oval_ o f, Pioneez_ Paea__ 45. IF Orhan realist be speciifiieed'iinn'welinol: Other mat Lers not objected to by Buyer __ 46. tMYprouAi Akl-P�reNeaNbMwHM.4' ern-Asae�-�NrWa (There1 U. assessments payment of which is required as a result of she cbaing Of this salaam 48. ❑ BUYER AND SELLER SHALL PRORATE AS OF THE DAYS OF CLOSING ❑ SELLOi SMALL P DATE OF CLOSING all bsta9menu 49. of Special assessments combed for payment with the rat Obla lliva da and n the Year of cITION. 50_ BUYER SHALL ASSUME ❑ SELLER SHALL PAY IT eau of We other .paid.......ante lovfed a Of IN data of this A9rormilu. IMeu aml 61. �.i BUYER SHALL ASSUME rl SELLER SHALL FOP PAYMENT OF special ..crate n.. periling as of Lbe data Of INS Ichak.ml 52, Agreemam for improvements IN em ordered by any .....sing •utnghies. (Seller's Provision for payment ,half be by aymen, Imo 53. actow of two 121 t' lin tad amount of the assessments or less, as required by Buyer's landed 54. 8'.r a any unpaid meelol ......menu payable in he Yea, I.S.w N domino and INrealmr. tea p.Ym.TT of which is rant gh.rwiu 56. to, A. of me data o1 IT. Apreamet. Suite, sp,.,.nt. tear SellerO HAS ❑ HAS NOT r ,Siv.d . nodca .....ding ey new knonan ment weak -Twar- e 57. p.i cr from any sae.Mrp ae,rove R IN .1. OI which gpje.t.NY be a..Wd egon. the pdoem, MY Sul nuic. received by SeMr 58. alter the &Is of this PweNse Agreement amid before clar Shelf M provided to SuYsr immed•teh'.i 59 Ma Pulehae A.taemen, and an q bCtd. IN dote Of Corsi iNn the pa,riaa me' ag,e. I. ,i,Yp. Sone Cbfirr., t0 ay. SO W."We la, IN p".an, .1. e1 assume the fPecial ..Walam.. N rM a eam.nt. sitNI any may declare this Funds.. 61 Aoteemem cancelled by written rgtlee to rN a raquamIN or ..,,,n. IN came. party. in whine cne this H✓cMa 62. Agreement is cancel Y de.Was IMe purchase Agaomel censer Buyer and Stile, .Nell bimed... h sign . C.... Sid.n of e3. .t maaY P.M N. Is - - - . Thed . SO to a cast menpage with subnNnt. fYMricNW. as r�IFesteseMieM�{9ersc ___ _. _ MN:PA-118/0al of Buyer's proany, II mY, may slip .fleet BWei s ability ro cabal , t nawirp sppliubb.l ❑ IS NOT subject to a car .IlTbn of a ntim Parcdae. Agtaamwn dated k enat- ebc ter jean . 20_ . II aid unwgatian Is not obtained by said data, Buyer and Build., "If mirecletely elfin . Caneellolion of N.M.. A.r.emem cur. umbg uid eec4btbn Form 1519A 3 PURCHASBACREP,RIENT 127. Address 128. Pe9e] Due.._-___... _... .... ... .. .... .. .__... . ._. 129. W R 130. panda in the you 30_ 131. Belle, has per, ❑ PRORATED FROM DAY OF CLOSING ❑ _ 12THS ❑ ALL ❑ NONE goal estate t..e. du M uNes Ow 132. pay.de in th. YsaI 20__ . II the eleskq date s cMpatl..M nst an.n taps paid aM1ee. i1 wonted. Oa .ywlod to .ha new c1 ing dal.. 133 warrants love• due and payable in Me Yew 20 _ shall 0.0 FULL-� PART �❑ NON- homesl.ad cles.ific.6an. rNxk 134 If Part- of gWn-hphWNaad at...lRci aba is cigd.d. Sel ar agrees to pay BUYe, .1 Choking $ ,. _ _ _ ___ 135 toward 1M nomhprpweed sal estate 1a[p. BurO agree. ID qY any nmeigrillg b.1.11C. 01 nM-BgMeleed b+eF wllwl t Y beeoml dM 136 and payable. Buyer anall pay tsal eurts loxes due and payable in M Year foNOLving cbsing and thereeher, the payme of which i. not 137 Otherwise hard. Provided. No repastarnmpns we merle c0gleuNrp Ind amount of suNepNm root sushi test. 138 POSSESSION: Seller shell Osiris, p...aubn of the property rot Later than - attar cbsing. 139. All inloras,, homeowmr'k aseocklbn due., tents and all charges for city water, city sewer, electricity and nalw pea shalt be wor.,ed 140. betwo.n the Paniea no of date of closing, Oliver .Lail Pay Belle, Id ramdnin, gelbna of fuel oN an IIGYN qD sum gas pan the day of 141. ebNng, an Ind rare of the last fit by Seller. Belief preen to remove ALL DEBWS AND ALL PERSONAL PROPER NOT INCLUDED HEREIN 142. from the pkeparg, by poeMo ion d.sa. M. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS: To tM Net o1 d,e SkWi. knowledge, the. a' no hazardous subs a, a u%WxgNund atu., lea, took a. .... at Mld. hated:. _.. ... __..... .. _ NCR lab SELLER WARRANTS THAT THE PROPERTY IS EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY CONNECTED TO: 1a1. CRY SEWER: DYES ❑NOI CITY WATER:❑YES❑N 1a8. ❑ NOT AMICABLE ❑ SELLER ❑ BUYER AGREES TO PROVIDE WATER QUALITY TEST LILTS SNOWING POTA8LE WATER (chock on.l 149. IF REQUIRED BY GOVERNING AUTHORITY AND/OR LENDER. 1 ED ❑ NOT APPLICABLE ❑ SELLER ❑ BUYER AGREES TO PROVIDE, IF REQUIRED BY TERMS OF THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT [rack mtl 151. OR BY GOVERNING AUTHORITY AND/OR LENDER, A LICENSED INSPECTOR'$ SETI SYSTEM INSPECTION REPORT OR NOTICE 152. INDICATING IF THE SYSTEM COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. NOTICE: A ALID CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR THE 1S3. SYSTEM MAY SATISFY THIS OBLIGATION. NOTHING W LINES 143 TO lea BHA OBLIGATE SELLER TO UPGRADE. REPAIR OR 15a. REPLACE THE SEPTIC SYSTEM. UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED TO W THIS PURCHA AGREEMENT. BUYER HAS RECEIVED THE WELL 155. DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OR A STATEMENT THAT NO WELL EXISTS ON TH ROFEATY, AND A SEPTIC SYSTEM DISCLOSURE 166 STATEMENT OR A STATEMENT THAT NO SEPTIC SYSTEM E%IbTB ON OP SE ES THE PROPERTY. AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA CIS). STATUTES. ISE. SELLER WARRANTS THAT CENTRAL AIR-CONDITIONING. HEATING, PLUMB G ANO WIRING SYSTEMS USED AND LOCATED ON SAID 169. PROPERTY SHALL BE IN WORKING ORDER ON DATE OF CLOSING, EXCEPTAS NOTED IN TH15 AGREEMENT. BUYER HAS THE RIGHT IN. TO A WALK-THROUGH REVIEW OF THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO CLOSING TO ESTABLISH THAT THE PROPERTY IS IN 161. SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME CONDITION AS OF THE DATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT. SELLER AGREES TO NOTIFY 162. BUYER IMMEDIATELY IN WRITING OF ANY SUBSTANTIVE C NOES FROM ANY PRIOR REPRESENTATIONS REGARDING 153. THE PHYSICAL CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY. IN. BUYER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT NO ORAL REPRESENTATIONS VE BEEN MADE REGARDING POSSIBLE PROBLEMS OF WATER IN 166. BASEMENT OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER OR ICE SURDU ON ROOF OF THE PROPERTY. AND BUYER RELIES SOLELY IN THAT I REGARD ON THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT BY SELLER: 167. SELLER ❑ HAS 0HA8 NOT HAD A WET BASEMENT HAS ❑HAS NOT HAD i100F, WALL OR CEILING DAMAGE CAUSED -IFMtk west- �RMck..) 168. BY WATER OR ICE SUILDUP. BUYER ❑ HAS ❑ HAS N RECEIVED A SELLER'S PROPERT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OR A I59. SELLER'S DISCLOSURE ELECTION FORM. BUYER NAB MM THE INSPECTION REPORTS, If REQUIRED BY MUNICIIALITY. 170. NOTICE 1)1. IL -Is[:) Seller's Ag•rnD BUVsI'S Aggent LamL'] Dual Agent ❑ Facilituar, (Chad k on* ICempanvl 1173 _ __. .. ._ _. _ _... IGceM,sal ISO Seller's Agent❑ Buyafa Agent Duel Agent Faeililel0r Ichae one Ill)s. Vl Icwnna. 5.HIS N CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS, I76. DUAL AGENCY REPRESENTATION 1)). PLEASE CHECK ONE OF THE iOL W W G 6ELECTIONS: r I )S. ❑ Dust Agency I.O'untalian OES NOT ...hg I. this transaction. Dis/perd lines 179.192. 1)9. ❑ Dual Agency feppent.60 DOES soot in INS transaction, Complete the dlsalo.ure in Eno' 190C92. IN, &OLN raw both Ind fH1 am NM Rivals) of Ind WgWa` Y Owal YI this ...inaction. Which create, a dud eGeneY. This IMMs 181. NMI Broker W its sales ams owe iWciarr duties to both Sa1LaIIs1 and Bwutd. Because the panss may have co.fgctup interests. 182. &okd end iu .de.pa'o an doM1ldted Boo advocalFg saaludvely Ia dlMr panv. Sick., eenwt et1 es •duel agem in this vamactim 19]. witMu .he eonsem of th SUlulal end Bwada. SeMrltl arM 8werbl ¢knowl.dge then 184. 01 eantwomial ' forgoeYnn eemmuNuud 1. Sicker which 'nude Once, t.,ms. or dwtivulm 1O BUY o, .all "M remain confideolf.) 185. unkx Saft W or Dwells) Mavuda Woke, in wfitirp t0 di.Cbu INu infofmation. Other nnf. m lion will h shared: 18fi_ 21 Broker a its astsapafanns witl ro.'pesed the rots'.. al .imig Party to me de.Hmem of the other, end 1ST. 131 within Smiss at dual agency. 9rokar and iro selespareOna will walk 68gem1y m fsGibtate the mechanics of rho saw. 188. With me it. end understanding of th eadanstim .hve. Sdbdd and BVYellal sulM1crixe end instruct &...I and it. sale.pasam. I89. to sat es du .gents In IN. usnsa..I*.. 190. us., Buver 191. S u Buyer I 192. Data Oate MN:PA-3 Ill/DAI Farm 1519A 4 194. Pepe 4 Data 195, 0THER:See.At Taghed Addendum 196. ISO. _ 200. Other addenda may be attached which are made a pan of this Purchase Agreement. (Enter total number of pages of this 201. Purchase Agreement, including addenda, on line two (2) of page one 111.) 202. 1, the owner of the property. accept this Agreement I agree to purchase the property for the price and in 203. authodZe the living broke. a accordance with the terms and conditions eat forth above. 204. tea •^^^ ^'-- 1 have reviewed all Pages of this Purchase Agreement. 205. NM44ew4rem.. Peterso Jacques F m and Company, LLC toe. z o�� . i� f� fi __ L. /LEA✓� /� Jl/8� 6 (Salle: a 519m1ureP f T IDalel IBuvire, 3 Postal 209. lL O�JQr /gJPl'r0f1 �P X John C. Xnobla.uch (Sal4i a Printed Name) fBWei s Minted Namal 210. X X IMariul Statue) - IMariul SuuDl 211X X (Sam". SiOnetwel IDate) Muver'a Sipnalwa) 10su1 21 T. X X (Eager's Mind Nwel f0 i s Primed Neme) 212. X X IMariul Suns) IMariul SWUsl 214 FINAL ACCEPTANCE DATE 215. THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT BETWEEN BUYERS AND SELLERS. 216- IF YOU DESIRE LEGAL OR TAX ADVICE. CONSULT AN APPROPRIATE PROFESSIONAL, 212. 1 ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE RECEIVED AND HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE ARBITRATION DISCLOSURE AND RESIDENTIAL 218. REAL PROPEATY BITRATION AGREEMENT. WHICH IS AN OPTIONAL VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT AND IS NOT PART OF THIS 219 PURCHASE AO illi 2T0. SELLERIS BUYEfl(S) �y �N"'W/ P• /U/K�//d-,��' 221. SELLER(S) BUYER(S) MN:PA-4 I82041 AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT, made and entered into this day of July, 2006, by and between Peterson -Jacques Farm Land Company, LLC ("Seller") and John C. Knoblauch or Permitted Assigns ("Buyer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer entered into a Purchase Agreement ("Purchase Agreement') dated May 18, 2006, regarding the sale of certain single family lots and outlots as shown on the preliminary plat of Pioneer Pass, Carver County, Minnesota ("Property"); and WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer desire to void a prior Addendum and an Amendment to the Purchase Agreement and replace said Addendum and Amendment with this Amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed by and between Seller and Buyer that the Purchase Agreement be amended as follows: 1. The prior Addendum and Amendment to the Purchase Agreement shall be null and void and replaced with this Amendment. 2. The Purchase Price on Page I of the Purchase Agreement shall be changed from Nine Million and 00/100 Dollars ($9,000,000.00) to Six Million Nine Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($6,900,000.00). 3. Purchase Price. Seller has agreed to sell to Buyer and Buyer has agreed to purchase from Seller the Property for the sum of Six Million Nine Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($6,900,000.00), which Buyer agrees to pay in the following manner: An initial One Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($100,000.00) as earnest money ("Initial Earnest Money"), which Seller acknowledges receiving upon execution of the Purchase Agreement on May 18, 2006; an additional earnest money payment ("Additional Earnest Money Payment') of One Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($150,000.00) to be deposited with Carver County Abstract ("Title Company") within three (3) days of all parties executing this Amendment; and an additional Four Million Nine Hundred Thirty-five Thousand Two Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($4,935,200.00) on the closing of Phase I. The remaining Purchase Price of One Million Seven Hundred Fourteen Thousand Eight Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,714,800.00) shall be paid on the closing of Phase H. The Additional Earnest Money Payment and the Initial Earnest Money shall become non-refundable and shall be paid by Title Company to Seller upon satisfaction of the contingencies in Paragraph 7 of this Purchase Agreement. The Purchase Price contemplates that Phase I will contain fifty-three (53) single family lots, two (2) outlots and a to -be -created outlot of approximately 27,000 square feet and Phase II twenty-eight (28) single family lots, as shown on the preliminary plat of Pioneer Pass, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Attached as Exhibit A-1 is a listing of the lots in each Phase. The division of the plat into phases shall be subject to the approval of the City of Chanhassen. If the City approval results in a different number of lots in the first phase the allocation of the number of lots in each phase shall be adjusted accordingly. If the number of lots is changed by the City, Doc# 216332712 the Purchase Price for Phase I shall be adjusted upward or downward based on Eighty-five Thousand One Hundred Eighty Five and 19/100 Dollars ($85,185.19) per lot based on the number of lots allowed by the City in Phase I that is more than or less than fifty-three (53) lots and a commensurate adjustment in Phase II so that the Purchase Price shall remain at Six Million Nine Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($6,900,000.00). 4. Closing. The closing of Phase I shall occur on or before September 14, 2006, if this Amendment is executed by Seller and delivered to Buyer no later than July 18, 2006. If this Amendment is executed later than July 18, 2006, the closing of Phase I shall occur on or before sixty (60) days from the date of execution. The closing of Phase II shall occur on or before January 2, 2008. Buyer may extend the closing date on Phase II until July 1, 2008, by Buyer giving Seller written notice of such extension at least ten (10) days prior to January 2, 2008, along with a payment of Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00). The Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) payment shall apply against the Purchase Price on Phase II. In no event shall the closing date be extended beyond July 1, 2008. 5, Preliminary Plat. Seller has obtained preliminary plat approval, rezoning and comprehensive plan use amendment (contingent on Metropolitan Council review) from the City of Chanhassen on April 24, 2006 ("Approvals"). Attached as Exhibit B is a letter from the City dated April 26, 2006 confirming such approvals and listing the conditions for final plat approval. Seller agrees, as soon as reasonably practicable, at no cost to Buyer, to furnish Buyer all documents, grading and engineering reports and data and all other information used in connection with the obtaining of the Approvals and any other actions related to the development of the property, including but not limited to dedication of property and commitment to any special assessments. Seller also agrees to negotiate the transfer of all rights to use the plans, reports and consultants retained by D.R. Horton, with the exception of D.R. Horton's environmental consultant, to Buyer as provided in Paragraph 7B of this Amendment. 6. Purchase Price Adiustment. The preliminary plat of Pioneer Pass provides for eighty-one (81) single family residential lots. If any action of the City or the Seller results in the final approval of a reduction in the number of single family lots, then the Purchase Price shall be reduced by Eighty-five Thousand One Hundred Eighty Five and 19/100 Dollars ($85,185.19) per lot; provided, however, if the number of lots is reduced below seventy-six (76), then Seller, at its option, may terminate this Purchase Agreement and refund to Buyer all earnest money paid hereunder. There shall be no reduction in the Purchase Price if the reduction in the number of lots is a result of actions taken by the Buyer. 7. Contingencies. This Purchase Agreement and the parties' obligations hereunder shall be contingent only upon the following two items (Buyer having previously waived all other conditions or contingencies): A. Buyer obtaining a Phase I and Phase II environmental report reasonably acceptable to Buyer. Within one (1) day of execution of this Amendment, Buyer agrees to authorize Braun Intertec, at Buyer's cost and expense, to proceed with the Phase I and Phase R that was previously authorized by Buyer. Buyer shall furnish to Seller a copy of the environmental report when it is completed. Seller agrees to provide any available environmental information to and cooperate with Braun Intertec in their 2 Da# 2163327/2 preparation of the environmental reports. Buyer shall have five (5) days from and after the receipt of such environmental reports to advise Seller that the reports are not reasonably acceptable to Buyer and the reason(s) they are unacceptable. Seller shall have three (3) days after receipt of such notice to advise Buyer that Seller, at Seller's cost and expense, will (a) have additional tests performed, and/or (b) pay the cost to remediate or remove any hazardous substances, or (c) elect to eliminate the property affected by the hazardous substances from this Purchase Agreement and make an appropriate adjustment in the Purchase Price. If Buyer fails to give notice to Seller within the five (5) days provided above, then Buyer shall be deemed to have accepted the environmental reports and waived its option to terminate this Purchase Agreement. Similarly, if Buyer objects and Seller fails to give the notice within the three (3) day period provided above, then this Purchase Agreement will terminate and the Initial Earnest Money and Additional Earnest Money shall be refunded to Buyer. B. Seller shall, within five (5) days of execution of this Amendment, deliver to the Tale Company an executed Escrow Agreement and related letters to consultants (James R. Hill, American Engineering Testing and Graham Environmental Services), substantially in the form attached as Exhibit C to this Amendment that transfers the rights to the engineering plans and soils tests and the rights to utilize the services of such consultants from D.R. Horton to Peterson -Jacques Farm Land Company, LLC and to Buyer. It is understood that the Escrow Agreement specifically excludes the transfer any environmental reports prepared by Tetra Tech EM, Inc. Seller will indemnify and hold harmless Buyer from and against any claim by D.R. Horton that Buyer does not have the right to use the aforesaid reports, data and tests. Buyer shall notify Seller in writing of any such claim by D.R. Horton and Seller shall be allowed ten (10) days after receipt of such notice to cure such default. If Seller is unable to cure the default within the time allowed, Buyer may waive such contingency or terminate this Purchase Agreement and the Initial Earnest Money and Additional Earnest Money refunded to Buyer and neither party shall have any further liability hereunder. 8. Conditions for Final Plat Approval. All conditions of final plat approval for Pioneer Pass, except as herein specifically provided as the responsibility of Seller, shall be the obligation of Buyer to satisfy, at Buyer's sole cost and expense. Buyer shall immediately proceed and thereafter diligently pursue the obtaining of final plat approval from the City. The obligations of Buyer shall include, but not be limited to, the following: A. Buyer shall be responsible for the construction of the street extension from the southern edge of the plat to Pioneer Pass to Pioneer Trail across MnDOT right-of- way. B. Buyer shall be responsible for grading, seeding and parking lot construction of the new City park as provided in the Approvals. Any reimbursement for such construction from the City shall go to the Buyer. Doc# 2163327\2 C. Buyer will be responsible for plant restoration in the Bluff Creek Overlay District for construction of storm water ponds. D. Buyer shall be responsible for construction of offsite storm water ponds to serve the development. The Seller shall be responsible for the following: A. Seller will donate and/or sell the required park land to the City, as required by the Approvals. The proceeds of any sale of park land to the City shall in all events belong to the Seller. B. Seller will, by separate easement agreement, grant an easement to Buyer to allow grading and installation of utilities across Phase II prior to the Phase II closing. The easement agreement will provide for an indemnification and hold harmless of Seller by reason of Buyer's presence on the Property, and shall require that Buyer keep Phase H free from any liens or encumbrances. C. Seller granting the adjoining property owner to the west a temporary construction easement allowing such owner to rough grade a portion of the Property to match the grades of the adjoining property, as is more specifically provided in the Easement Agreement. D. Seller has agreed, as part of the plat approval for Pioneer Pass, to grant to the City an easement for ponding and wetland mitigation on Outlot A, Pioneer Pass ("Outlot A"). Seller shall, at closing, grant to Buyer an easement across Outlot A to access and construct the storm water pond and create the wetland mitigation area required by the City. In addition, Seller shall agree that as part of the final plat Buyer will create an Outlot over approximately 27,000 square feet in the northeast comer of the property and convey at closing said Outlot to Buyer. E. Seller agrees to sign the Plat of Pioneer Pass, but makes no representation or warranties with respect to the same, including suitability, drainage, soil condition and similar matters. F. Seller acknowledges that the Planning Commission of the City has recommended as a condition to final plat approval of Pioneer Pass (Condition #45) that future utility services and access to Outot B be determined. Seller agrees to use reasonable business efforts to eliminate the access requirement of such condition. Buyer agrees, at Buyer's expense, to stub the sewer and water utility lines to the easterly property line of the plat of Pioneer Pass, as shown on the plat submission to the City. 9. Seller Representations. Seller hereby makes the following disclosures relating to the environmental condition of the Property: (i) Approximately fifteen (15) years ago, Seller spread (or allowed to be spread) petroleum -contaminated soils on approximately twenty (20) acres of the Dm4 216332712 Property pursuant to a plan approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. A single barrel that had leaked petroleum products was found on the Property. The spill site was remediated under the direction of Tetra Tech EM, Inc. by Rehbein Companies (contact Alex McClean) in December 2005 and January 2006. (iii) Seller does not know of any individual sewage treatment systems on or serving the Property, except that Seller discloses that an old farmhouse is situated southeasterly of the Property within the area taken by MnDOT as road right-of-way, and Seller has not previously confirmed whether the individual sewage treatment system for that homestead is situated on the Property or within the MnDOT right-of-way. 10. Special Assessments. Buyer shall assume all assessments that are levied or deferred as of the date hereof and all assessments pending as of the date hereof or hereafter levied with respect to the Property per the allocation based on the attached tabulation of special assessments from Kimsey -Horn for the column labeled "Large Developable Parcel (Old DR Horton Site) Area 1 and 2(Exhibit D . Seller and Buyer agree that, if they pursue a reduction in the assessments on the property being purchased or, in the case of Seller the remaining portions of the property, and are successful in reducing the assessment, such action will not result in transferring any additional assessment amount to the other. If such action does result in an increase in assessments to the other's property by reason of such transfer, then the resulting increase shall be paid by the benefiting party to the other. 11. Proration and Closing Costs. Seller and Buyer agree to the following prorations and allocation of costs, fees, taxes and special assessments with respect to the Property, which the parties will pay at the applicable closing: A. Title and Closing Fees. Seller shall pay fees charged by Title Company related to issuing the Title Commitment, including all examination fees and title search fees. Buyer shall pay the premium(s) for the Title Policy. Seller and Buyer shall each pay one-half (1/2) of any closing fee charged by Title Company. With respect to all other costs, each party shall pay its share of the closing costs which are normally assessed by Title Company against a seller or buyer in a transaction of this character in the County. B. Deed Tax and Recording Fees. Seller shall pay any deed tax, conservation tax, and the cost of recording any documents necessary to cure any title objections or otherwise transfer good and marketable title to Buyer. Buyer shall pay all document recording fees for the warranty deed. C. Real Estate Taxes. Seller shall pay all real estate taxes due and payable in the years prior to the year of closing of the applicable Phase. Real estate taxes due and payable in the year of closing shall be pro rated on a calendar basis at closing, effective as of the applicable date of closing. If a closing shall occur before the tax Dora 2163327U rate is fixed for the year of such closing, the apportionment of the taxes shall be upon the basis of the real estate taxes for the preceding year, but any difference in actual real estate taxes for the year of such closing shall be adjusted between the parties to the actual amount upon receipt of written evidence of the payment thereof. Buyer shall pay all real estate taxes payable in the years after the year of closing of the Phase being purchased. In the event a Phase to be purchased by Buyer is, on the date of closing of such Phase, taxed as a part of a larger parcel, Seller shall at the closing of such Phase deposit into escrow with Title Company sufficient funds to pay Seller's pro rata share of the taxes for the current year (and all prior unpaid taxes) for such larger tax parcel, and Buyer shall, at the closing of such Phase, deposit into escrow sufficient funds to pay Buyer's pro rata share of the taxes for the Phase. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, Seller shall pay the real estate taxes and installment of special assessments payable therewith up to the date of closing on Phase 11; provided, however, Buyer shall reimburse Seller, at the Phase H closing, for all installments of special assessments paid by Seller on Phase D since the closing of Phase I. D. Deferred Taxes. Seller shall pay all "Green Acres" recapture taxes or similar taxes attributable to agricultural or special use valuation or any other deferred taxes with respect to the Property, if any. Seller may work with Title Company and the County to apportion any such recapture between Phase I and Phase II and to pay only that portion due at the applicable closing. 12. Ownership of Documents. If this Purchase Agreement is terminated for any reason, Buyer shall furnish to Seller, at no cost to Seller, in addition to the environmental reports and appraisal, all rights to and copies of all engineering, soil and other reports done in connection with the Property prior to the termination of this Purchase Agreement. 13. Commission. Seller and Buyer each hereby warrant and represent to the other that no brokers, agents, finder's fees, commissions, or other similar fees are due or arising in connection with the entering into this Agreement, the sale and purchase of the Property, or the consummation of transactions contemplated herein. Any compensation due for John E. Chadwick of J. Edwin Chadwick, LLC, will be paid by Seller. Seller and Buyer each hereby agree to indemnify and hold the other harmless from and against all liabilities, loss, cost, damage, or expense (including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees and costs of litigation) which the other party shall suffer or incur because of any claim by any other broker, agent, or finder claiming by, through or under such indemnifying party, whether or not such claim is meritorious, for any compensation with respect to the entering into of this Agreement, the sale and purchase of the Property, or the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein. 14. Notices. Any notice or communication required or permitted hereunder shall be deemed to be delivered, whether actually received or not, when deposited in the United States mail, postage fully prepaid, registered or certified mail, addressed to the intended recipient at the following address, or when delivered, if delivered personally to such address. Any address for notice may be changed by written notice so given. Doc#216IJ27\2 If to Buyer: John Knoblauch 1450 Knob Hill Excelsior, MN 55331 with a copy to: Terry Schneider Project Developers, Inc. 600 So. Hwy. 169, Suite 1580 St. Louis Park, MN 55426 If to Seller: Severin H. Peterson, Jr. Peterson -Jacques Farm Land Company, LLC 15900 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55347-4047 Facsimile No: 952-937-1598 with a copy to: Bruce G. Odlaug, Esq. Lindquist & Vennum P.L.L.P. 4200 IDS Center 80 South Eight Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Facsimile No: 612-371-3207 and a copy to: John Chadwick 11430 Zion Circle Bloomington, MN 55437 Facsimile No: 952-886-0492 IS. Assignment. Buyer may not assign this Purchase Agreement, in whole or in part, at any time without the prior written approval of Seller; provided, however, that Buyer may form a limited liability company (anticipated to be named Pioneer Pass LLC), to include himself and additional builders, provided that John C. Knoblauch retains an ownership interest in the new entity, and the reputation and financial condition of any additional builders do not negatively impact the ability of the entity to perform under this Agreement, and provided further that the limited liability company assume all obligations of Buyer under this Purchase Agreement. If and when additional builders are added or included in the ownership entity, either a balance sheet and profit and loss statement for the last two (2) fiscal years or a letter from a financial institution stating that the builder has the financial capacity to complete its share of this transaction shall be furnished to Seller. 16. Except as amended or modified herein, the Purchase Agreement is in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Purchase Agreement the day and year as noted below. Data 2 ( 6332T2 SELLER: FARM LAND COMPANY, LLC Lin Its: BUYER: Joh oblauch or Permitted Assigns Dated: 7,116 /Yi 6 The undersigned agrees to act as Escrow Agent pursuant to the terms of the foregoing Purchase Agreement. CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT COMPANY M. Its: Dated: July , 2006 Doc# 2163327\2 Exhibit A z li Exhibit A l' 0 3 vvSS i On IA \ N N sws V Z �i ERE �©oi�mo �oo■�mo �oo■�mo �ao■�mo �mo■�mo �mo■�mo �oo■�mo ��■moo �o©■gym© �©©■gym© �o©■gym© �o©■gym© �o©■gym© gym,©■�m� May 10 2006 2:13PM Chadwick Group, Inc 1-866-734-3621 p. MAY. 10. 2006 2:49PM LINDOUIgT A V Mnk1 MRY-02-2006 10,.26 Exhibit B T 7635099154 P.01i09 powr Fax Now 7671 ID118 Ta g Fwm April 26, 2006 °o'ee°L Oo. Phme It Plgrra a � p b asa bt> •311-� 1 F=* C!� 1� l Of CMS EN Mr. John Chadwick J.1;dwin Chadwick, LLC 7= MW sodtM 11430 Zion Circle Po gal lar ow?=,M+NM17 Bloomington, MN 55437 MMWS"*n Re: Pioneer Pass - Planning Case #106-09 Fta=M222.1100 Farssz2tms Dear Mr. Chadwick: euflam Inspecad m Rwna 95222 19D This letter is to confirm that on April 24, 2006, the Chanhassen C" Council ;az�.nto Pri rtY approved the following irryineariag PhMC=W96'1As A. "Comprehensive plan Land Use Amendment from Residential -Medium Density and Office/Industrial to Residential - Low Density of the land within the Flunu Plat of Pioneer Pass except for Oulots A, B, C, D and O contingent on ftEFu9 nt9 Metropolitan Council review." Put & Reaeaton x ni i i o B. "Rezoning of the ]and: within the Plat for Pioneer Pass except for Outlots A, B, C, D and (3, Pioneer Pass, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Residential tree alo Codler BOU" Low and Medium Density District, RUL" P9mc 5."a122.11Ca Fa 952Zt7.1404 Plalneq & C. "Prehm%ary Plat for "Pioneer Pass" creating 81 lots, 9 outlots and right-of- Naluml Rescurm way for public streets, plans prepared by James R. Hill, Inc., dated 213/06. Ftgne:952.2Z7.113a subject to the following conditions: FeL a>nd.nln F011c Works 1. Tile developer.xl-ia1T"?tepare a noise ati4ysig'ft noise i iat will be s.q ft Road generated by traffic on $h ray 312 and Pioneer Trail. The analysis shall FhCnz Pri gallon measures to meet noise standards for identifya ate noise mitt Far96t1213100 Far 952S27.t310Pp residential homes.' Senlorttft Phmcs52m.11t5 Fµ 9r'2-W110 2 The developer shall portion peS' pay $21,547.00 as their of the 2005 AUAR. Wet SAC 3, The applicant shall plant 369 trees within the development, 98 overstory and wwa C7°""m"mwz required btdfer yard plantings tmes along Collector Road D and buffer yard plantings for lots along the south property line. 4. Each lot shall have a minimum of two overstory deciduous trees planted in the front yard. 5. The applicant shall install the total required buffer yard along Collector Road D or show proof of berm height of 3 feet or higher along the length of the smxt and adjust the quantities of understo:y and shrubs accordingly, The City of Milhassen• Agtu4 wmmmiry sdh dun tikes,gmli$sdwk a tMaTing doardaml, Outing Wslnwr,,Pinding WN. and WIN parts A 90 %32 10an, wk, and play. May 10 2006 2:13PM Chadwick Group, Inc 1-866-734-3621 p.3 MAY. 10. 2006 2:49PM LINDQUIST & VENNUM NO. 268 P. 3 i'µ+r-eU-ecru, 11d:J4 UNAWI5TVA9-WM 6123713207 P.02i09 MAY-02-2006 10:27 CONSLITM MOMT CONST 7635099154 P.02i09 i&. John Chadwick April 26, 2006 Page 2 of 8 6. The applicant shall development a restoration plan including native plants for the Bluff Creek Overlay district north of Block 1. The plant species shall be selected from the Bluff Creek Management Plan Appendix C. The final plan must be reviewed and approved by the city before installation. 7. Signage for the Bluff Creek Oveday District must be posted on every cam property comer where residential yards meet the primary zone, S. The 950 contour shall be extended over lots 5 and 6, block 3 to provide more coverage from headlights for those homes, 9. Dedication of Oudots A and G shall be made m the city or a conservation casement shall be established over said outlets. 10. The developer shall designate a 4.72 acre neighborhood park site. Outlot EL This property shall be transferred to the city by warranty deed with 3.79 acres of the site being dedicated) donated by the applicant/owner and the remaining 0.93 acres being purchased by the City of Chanhassen. The city shall compensate the ownerfapplicant $218,550 in total compensation for said 0.93 acres. 11. The developer shall rouge grade and cover seed the park site and cansttuct a 20 stall parking lot for an additional not to exceed payment of $50,000 from the city. The parking lot shall include insurmountable curb, Construction plans for all improvements within the borders of the park shall be submitted to the Park & )recreation Director for approval prior to initiating constuction of these ]mpmvements. All material and labor costs are reimbursable. Design, engineering, and testing services associated with these improvements shall be provided by the applicant 12. The applicant shall submit a complete wedand replacement plan and must receive approval of the replacement plan prior to alteration of wetlands. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act W 8420). 13. Wedand mitigation shall not be proposed for the northeast corner of the site in order to ensure adequate airs for a road connection to the property to the cast of the site. I4. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around all Ag/L%an wetlands. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wedand buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall be set back 40 feet from the edge of the wetland buffer The wetland buffer setback shall be shown on the plans. b —Iffy areal gh Tl{c pivp"etty't fiat iri6et�lte�Cily . cdrM5. for" duffs (i,e., slope greater. than May 10 2006 2:14PM Chadwick Group, Inc 1-866-734-3621 p.4 MAY. 10. 2006 2:49 PM LINDQUIST & VENNUM ENO. 266w7 P. A. e?,e9 MAY-2-2006 10.27 CONELLTING MGKT WNST 7635099154 P.03/09 Mr. John Chadwick April 26, 2006 Page 3 of g orqual to i0.°k aced a risp m slope of at leasr25ieei above tht toe) shall be-pzed In addition, all structures shall maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff ad land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). The plans shall be revised to show any areas meeting the City's bluff criteria. 16. No alterations shall be permitted within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor without a variance. All structures must meet the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor. 17. The applicant shall demonstrate that storm water management along the southwest property line of Lou 25-31, Black 2 is adequate to prevent drainage issues for future homeowners. I S. The outlet for Pond 2 shall be moved westward to increase the flow distance between the inlet and outlet structures. 19. Drainage and utility easements with a minimum width of 20 feet shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer area used as public value credit and storm water infrastructure. 20. Energy dissipation shall be provided at the flared -end section inlet to Pond 2 within 24 hours of installation. Additional blanket shall be provided for storm sewer installation area for inlet infrastructwe to Pond 2. The access area shall be protected with erosion control blanket upon the establishment of final grade. Erosion control blanket shall be used on die slopes within Lots 31-24, Block 2. Mulch shall be substituted for the blanket proposed for the berm area of Block 3 along Street A. 21. Temporary sediment basins shall be provided in existing watersheds i and 3 during mass grading activities. Where 10 acres or more of exposed area come to a disoemable point of discharge to a wetland or waterway, a temporary basin shall be provided The proposed storm water basins In proposed drainage areas 2, 6 and 7 shall be temporary sediment basins until the contributing areas are stabilized. The temporary outlets could be installed in place of the permanent outlets. 22. Perimeter control (silt fence) shall be installed prior to grading along the south side of the Street D and CSAH 14 (Pioneer Trail) intersection. All silt fences near flared -end sections shall be installed up and around flared -end sections so water is not discharged against the wilt fence, causing it to fail. 23. An outlet area shall be defined for the two areas labeled as temporary sedimentation basins during the rough gradfng/subcut street phase of development. Any shredded wood material from tree removal shall be saved for temporary mulch berms/vehicle exit pads as May 10 2000 2:14PM Chadwick Group, Inc 1-866-734-3621 P. MAY, I) 2006 2:49hi LINDQUIS' & NENNUM NO. 268 P. 3 niy-ed-,eMb 10;.14 L1NLUU4W&VtMUN 61c , 2B7 r.04iO4 MAY-02-2006 10:26 CONSULTING MGMT COhST 7635059154 P.04/09 Mr. John Chadwick April 26,2006 Page 4 of 8 needed_ Typical silt fence shall be installed prior to initial tough grading activities along the west side of Outlet ii to the proposed "street by others." 24. The total SwNM fee shall be paid to the City at the time of final plat recording. The estimated total SWMP fee at this time is S 165,600. 25. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Rr7ey-Purgatory-B1uj Creek Watershed District, M Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Nawrai Resources (dewatering permit), Army Corps of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval. 26. A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i,e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 27. are apparatus access roads and water supply:for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the tme of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. 28. Temporary street signs shall be installed on street intersections once construction of the new roadways allows passage of vehicles. Pursuant to 2W2 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. 29. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to prow ds all-weather driving capabilities. Pursuant to Minnesota Fire Code Section 503.23. 30. Submit proposed street naives to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. 31. Fire hydrant spacing is unacceptable. Locate fire hydrants at interseetions and in cul-&-sacs and at 300 foot spacing. Most spacing is in excess of 400 to 500 feet at this time. Submit revised fire plans to Fite Marshal for review and approval. 32. Before site grading commences, the existing building and driveway access off Pioneer Trail onto the property must be removed. 33. On the grading plan, add a note to remove any existing house and driveway access. 34. The developer's engineer must work with liberty on Bluff Creek's engineer to ensure that the proposed grading on each property matches at the property line. 35. Ground slopes shall not exceed 3:1. May 10 2006 2:14PM MAY.10.2006 2:50PM MAY-02-2M6V 10:28 Mr. John Chadwick April 26, 2006 Page 5 of 8 Chadwick Group, LIOQUIST & VENNUM 1ly._I�I Y4K�.pI�YIRI-II('_�IM� Y.�M1�ELL imu IIVIII Inc 1-eGG-734-3621 NO. 268 CYYIS ONI T ��s��ls2e7 6350991.S4 36. A minimum 75-foot long rock construction entrance must be shown on the plans. 37. Retaining walls must be designed by a structural engineer registered in the State of Minnesota and require a building permit if greater than 4 feet in height. 38. The developer shall work with Md= to move the access at Pioneer Trail so that_ it aligns with the MW30rs stteot on the south side. T'ba atacess to Pioncer`frag sbaTI_ p.constmctedl in conjunction with the -51# pE&W of the de'velopmeat 39. The Property is also subject to sanitary sewer and water hook-up dtatges for all of the lots. The 2006 trunk utility hookup charges ate $1,575 per unit for sanitary sewer and $4,078 per unit for water. The 2006 SAC charge is $1,625 per unit. 40. The Arterial Collector Roadway Pee of $2,400fdevelopable acre will need to be paid at the time of final plat nxording. 41. All of the ponds an: required to be designed to National Urban Runoff Program O1 T[ 1RP) standards with maximum 3:1 slopes and 10:1 bencbes at the NW1- Revise accordingly. 42. All of the proposed housepads must have a rear yard elevation of at least three feet above the HWL of the adjacent ponds. 43, Storm sewer calculations and drainage map must be submitted with the final plat application. The storm sewer must be designed to accommodate a I0-year, 24-hour storm event 44. The Jast public stormwater structure that is road -accessible prior to discharging to a water body must have a 3-foot sump pump. 45. Future utility service and access to Outlot B needs to be determined prior to final plat, 46. The applicant shall include a draintile system behhai the curbs to convey sump pump discharge from homes. 47. Add catch basins in the back yards of Lots 1-15, Block 3 connecting to Street C storm sewer. Also add a catch basin along Street A in front of Lots 25-28 and between Lots 15 & 16 and 4 & 5, Block 1. 4& All plans must be signed by a registered Civil Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. 49. The catch basin between Ina 6 & 7 must be built with two inlet openings. 50. Tree preservation fencing must be installed at the limits of tree removal. May 10 2006 2:15PM Chadwick Group, Inc 1-866-734-3621 p. MAY. 10.2006 2:50PM LINDQUIST & VENNUM N0.266 P. 7 rani wit—u�no an-ov L.1ru u.iWM1�1 612371320? P.06i09 MAY-02-2006 10:28 CETI5tt_TING MGMT CONST ?&ZO93154 P.WI'09 Mr_ Tchn Chadwick April 26, 2006 Page 6 of 8 51. An easement is required fiom dre appropriate property owner for any off -site grading. 52. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 53, Utility services for the bulldiuga must be shown on the final utility plan. Sanitary services must be 6-inch PVC and water service must be 1-inch copper, Type K and will require a City Building Department inspection. 54. Extend the silt fence along the south to the back yard of Lot 25, Block 1. 55. No retaining wall is allowed within any dtsinage and utility easement. Revise the retaining wall between Tots 22,23 and 24, Block 2, accordingly. 56. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the CitYs latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. no applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. The applicant Hurst be aware thst all public utility improvements will require a preconstruction Meeting before building permit issuance. 57. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required prior to construction, including but not limited to MPCA, NPDES, MnDOT, Depaftmem of Health. Carver County and watershed District. 58. Reroute the sanitary sewer from Street A and the north -south corridor intersection to minimize the sewer depth. Relocate the southern sanitary sewer out of the stormwaier pond easement at Oudot E. 59. Add a pressure relief valve to the watermain along Street D between Outlots E and F. This will be a City improvement cost but installed by at the time of development. 60. In -home pressure reducing water valves may be requited on all lots with a lowest floor elevation of 930 or less. Final detetntination for the need of in -home pressure reducing valves will be made by the City at time of building permit 61. The applicant shall coordinate with the developer of the adjacent properties in the northeast comer of the site the dedication of public street right-of-way to provide access from the parcel to the north to the parcel to the east and revise the plans accordingly." D. "Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands on property subject to the following conditions: May 10 2006 2:15PM Chadwick Group, Inc 1-866-734-3621 P. MAY. 10. 2006 2:5OPM LINDQUIST & VENNUM NO. 268 P. 8 MAY-02-2006v 10:29 CMLLTiNG MIT CONST 7635099154 P.07i09 Mr. John Chadwick April 26, 2006 Page 7 of 8 1. The applicant shall submit a complete wetland replacement plan and must receive approval of the replacement plan prior to alteration of wetlands. Wetand replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the Mirmesom Wetland Conservation Act (MR;8420). I Wetland mitigation shall not be proposed for the northeast comer of the site in order to ensure adequate area for a road connection to the property to the east of the site. 3. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be maintained around all AVTJrban wetlands. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the C ity's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, underthe direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. All structures shall be set back 40 feet from the edge of the wedand buffer. The wetland buffet' setback shall be shown on the plans." E. "Conditional Use Permit to pegxrit doclopment wiffliA the Bluff Creek Ovet3ay District with a v4darlcs for encroachment into thepAm=y zone to construct a storm water pond subject to the followingconditions^ ' ' I. Dedication of Outlots A and G shall be made to the city or a conservation easement shall be established over said oudots. 2. Any areas on the property that meet the City $ criteria for bluffs (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe) shall be preserved In addition, all structures shall maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). The plans shall be revised to show any areas meeting the City's bluff criteria. 3. No alterations shall be permitted within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor without a variance. All structures must meet the 40-Moot setback from the primary corridor." Please note that the Land Use Amendment trust be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for their review. The City will not be able to act on the final plat until we have the Metropolitan Council sign off on the amendment Final plat documents must be submitted to the City three weeks prior to the City Council meeting in which you wish to have your final plat approved Conditions of the preliminary plat approval must be addressed for final plat approval. Enclosed is the list of items required for submittal for final plat approval. May 10 2006 2:16PM MAY. M 2006 2:50PM MPY-02-20W 10:29 Mr. John Chadwick April 26, 2M6 Page S of 8 Chadwick Group, Inc LINDQUIST & VENNUM u� w awnwn CONSULTING MGMT cu\tsT 1-866-734-3621 NO. 268 P. 9 6iejri.207 r.03/09 76MO99154 P.08/09 Should you have any questions, please feel fife to contact me at (952) 227-1131 or beenerMusOci.chaghassen mn us. 9incerely Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner Enclosures cc: Alyson Fauske, Assistain City Engineer Jerry Mohn, Acting Building Official ral==WPI--iuc==A0&WP--Ppx\WMV21]alrrPeel W=YAW May 10 2006 2:16PM Chadwick Group, Inc 1-e66-734-3621 p. V'AY.1D.2BC6 2:F0PM LIN80UIST & VE,NN'UM EN0.2682e7 P. 1Qaq/oq MY-02-2e96 10:29 COISLLTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P,09i09 CITY OF CHANHASSEN ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT CONSIDERATION The following items are required to be submitted a minimum of three (3) weeks prior to City Cound( meeting and payment of a $250.00 final plat review fee: Submit three (3) sets of full size construction plans and specifications for staff review and redline. • Utility plans shall show both plan view and profiles of all utilities (sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer lines). The plan view must show all drainage and utility easements. • Grading and drainage plans shall show dwelling type and elevators, wetlands and wetland buffer areas, stormwater pond NWL and HWL, EOF and catch basin and storm manhole numbers. • The construction plans and specifications shall be in accordance to the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications & Detail Plates. • The plans shall include traffic signaga and street light placement, 2. Drainage calculations for water quantity and quality pending with maps showing drainage areas for pre -and post -development conditions and contributing areas to catch basins. 3. Hydraulic calculations and drainage map for the storm sewer design. 4. Tree Preservation Easements Cif applicable). 5. Trail Easements (if applicable). 6. Engineer's Cost Estimate of Public Improvements: a. Sanitary sewer system, b, Watersystem. c. Storm sewer drainage system including cleaning and maintenance. d. Streets, sidewalk and trails. e. Erosion control. f. Site restoration (seeding, sodding, etc.). g. Site grading In. Street lights & signs i. Engineering, surveying & inspection j. Landscaping 7. Five (5) sets (folded) of final plat, one (1) set of reductions (8h' x 1 T% and a digital copy in Alf format. S. Digital copy of the legal description of the property in a Acc or .pdf compatible format 9. Lot tabulations 10. T = 200' scale paper or mylar reduction of the final plat with just street names and Lot and Block numbers. 11. Legal description of the propertylproperties to be platted. Fallure to provide any of the above kems by the required deadline will result In delaying consideration of final plat before the City Council. Uper—cries-0s D:16nchrm3Tna1 Dial UibmitbLdw 10 TOTAL P.09 TOTAL P.69 Exhibit C ESCROW AGREEMENT THIS ESCROW AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of 2006, by and among D.R. HORTON, INC.—MINNESOTA, a Delaware corporation ("Iiorton"); PETERSON-JACQUES FARM LAND COMPANY, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Peterson') and CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT ("Escrow Agent'). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Horton and Peterson entered into an Option Agreement covering a portion of the property owned by Peterson and located in Carver County, Minnesota, and being part of the property legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto ("Property'); and WHEREAS, Horton, under the terns of the Option Agreement, proceeded to obtain from the City of Chanhassen ("City") preliminary plat approval of Pioneer Pass for its proposed development; and WHEREAS, Horton, in connection with the obtaining of such approvals, retained consultants, planners, surveyors, and engineers (hereinafter "Consultants') and incurred expenses with the City in obtaining preliminary plat approval; and WHEREAS, the Consultants have prepared surveys, reports, studies and other work ("Consultant Work") in obtaining the preliminary plat approval; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission granted preliminary plat approval subject to numerous conditions as set forth in the Staff Report dated March 21, 2006; and WHEREAS, Horton has elected not to proceed with the project and has not exercised its option to purchase the Property; and WHEREAS, Horron has agreed to sell and transfer and Peterson has agreed to purchase from Horton the Consultant Work on the terms and conditions hereinafter provided; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed by and among the parties as follows: 1. Horton hereby authorizes and consents to Peterson and/or its purchaser or assigns to employ the Consultants listed on the attached Exhibit B to work on the development and final plat approval of Pioneer Pass. The authorization and consent includes, but is not limited to, the use of all work performed by Horton or the Consultants in connection with the Property and the application for approval of Pioneer Pass. The authorization includes the snaking of any changes or modification to such work. 2. Horton has incurred with the Consultants and City those expenses in the amount set opposite their names on Exhibit B totaling $68,048.72. Horton represents that such expenses have been paid in full. Doc# 2M666V Jul 13 2006 5:51PM Chadwick Group, Inc 1-6G6-734-3621 p.2 3. Peterson and/or its purchaser or assigns proposes, subject to certain conditions, to proceed to obtain final plat approval of Pioneer Pass. Peterson agrees, upon obtaining of final plat approval of Pioneer Pass and the closing of the sale of the Property, to reimburse Horton for the Consultants' and City's expenses in an amount not exceed $68.048.72. The amount of reimbursement shall be conditioned upon the extent of the use of the Consultant Work in obtaining final plat approval. If modifications are made so that some or all of the Consultant Work cannot be used, then an appropriate adjustment in the reimbursement due Horton shall be made. 4. Horton has delivered to Escrow Agent executed letters to each Consultant in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. Escrow Agent is directed to mail the letters to each Consultant upon payment from the closing proceeds of the sale of the Property the reimbursement amount as certified by Peterson. Peterson shall, prior to or at closing, certify to the Escrow Agent and Horton the amount to be reimbursed Horton based on the use of the Consultant Work as provided above. Horton also has deposited with Escrow Agent a bill of sale for such Consultant Work and City deposits in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D. The bill of sale shall be delivered by Escrow Agent to Peterson at closing. 5. Any notice or other communication in connection with this Escrow Agreement will be in writing and will be sent by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, by a nationally -recognized overnight courier guaranteed next day delivery, or by personal delivery, property addressed as follows: If to Horton: D.R Horton, Inc. —Minnesota 20860 Kenbridge Court, Suite 100 Lakeville NIN' 55044 Attn: Neil G. Hansen If to Peterson: Severin H. Peterson, Jr. Peterson -Jacques Farm Land Company, LLC 15900 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie MN 55347 With a Copy to: If to Escrow Agent: John Chadwick 11430 Zion Circle Bloomington MN 55437 Carver County Abstract 411 Chestnut Street North Chaska MN 55318 Attn: 6. This Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 7. This document may be executed in separate counterparts, each of which and all together will constitute this document in its entirety, Axi 2156666U Jul 13 2006 5:51PM Chadwick Group, Inc I-666-734-3621 p.3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. D.R. HORTON, INC: MINNESOTA By Its: PETERSON-JACQUES FARM LAND COMPANY, LLC By: Its: ESCROW AGENT: CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT By: Its: 3 Doc# z 1 s6666\1 Jul 13 2006 S:S1PM Chadwick Group, Inc 1-666-734-3621 p.4 EXHIBIT A The Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116 North Range 23 West; and the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 27, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota. 4 Dx# 21566601 Jul 13 2006 5:51PM Chadwick Group, Inc 1-866-734-3621 P.5 EXHIBIT B American Engineering Testing, Inc. (Invoice #31704) City of Chanhassen Development Applications/Escrows Property Owner Labels Invoice Statement dated 3/20/06 James R Hill, Inc. (Invoice #31900 —provides total project on page 2 of 2) Graham Environmental Services, Inc. Invoice #2601201 Invoice #2513304 Invoice #2601202 Carver Soil and Water Conservation District TOTAL: 5 Dm#2156666u $ 5,575.00 S 4,180.00 $ 36.00 $ 165.00 $54,672.95 S 2,092.50 $ 141.71 S 1,185.56 $ 0.00 $68,048.72 Jul 13 2006 5:51PM Chadwick Group, Inc 1-G6G-734-3G21 p.6 EXHIBIT C Re: Preliminary Plat of Pioneer Pass Gentlemen: You have performed services on behalf of D.R. Horton, Inc. — Minnesota in connection with the approval of the preliminary plat of pioneer Pass, Carver County, Mirnesota. We have paid you in full for your services and have advised you that we have elected not to exercise our option to purchase the Pioneer Pass property and will not proceed with the development. Please be advised that we have transferred to the owner of the land, Peterson -Jacques Farm Land Company, LLC, or its assigns (including but not limited to any purchaser of the property) ("Uvnee, all of our right, title and interest in your reports, drawings or other work on this project. This will also confirm that we previously advised you that you can continue to work on further reports, drawings and the like, in connection with obtaining final plat approval on behalf of the Owner making such changes or modifications to the work you performed on our behalf as are requested by the Owner. All such work requested by the Owner shall be at the sole cost and expense of Owner, and D.R. Horton, Inc. — Minnesota shall not be responsible for any additional cost or expenses whatsoever. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, D.R. HORTON, INC.—MINNESOTA By. Its: D=4 21 s6666\1 Jul 13 2006 5:51PM Chadwick Group, Inc - 1-866-734-3621 p.7 EXHIBIT D STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ss• BILL OF SALE ) D.R. HORTON, INC.-MINNESOTA, a Delaware corporation ("Seller'), in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, to it in hand paid by ("Boyer"), the receipt and sufficiency of MUM are hereby acknowledged, does hereby convey and transfer unto Buyer, its successors and assigns, the personal property described as follows: of [Fill in Description of Consultant Work] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller has executed this Bill of Sate as of the , 2006, D.R. HORTON, INC: MINN'ESOTA By. Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF ) I. day 2006, before me, a notary public, personally appeared . the of a on behalf of Notary Public 7 DOCK 2156666\1 Peterson Property Assessments Total Property Large Developable Parcel Outlot B Outlot C KHA Exhibit Areas (Old DR Horton site) Area 1 and 2 Area 3 Area 4 Assessable Area (acre) 51.22 42.32 3.58 2.82 2,231,000 1,843,000 156,000 123,000 —s? cxh,a d C. /-� -1 /0 G Outlot D Area 5 2.50 109,000 TH 212 Related Im rovements Assessable Area acre 56.30 47.40 3.58 2.82 2.50 Assessments Roadwa Trunk Watermain §103,905.48 $84753.97 $87 479.92 $71.355.92 $6,607.13 $5,389.33 $5.204.50 $4245.23 $4,613.92 $3,763.50 Total $188,659.45 $158,835.84 $11,996.46 $9,449.73 - $8,377.42 2009 MUSA Bid Packa a #1 Assessable Area acre 56.30 47.40 3.58 2.82 2.50 Assessments Roadwa Trunk Watermain Trunk Sanitary Sewer $179,253.35 $41,078.18 $80,712.88 $150,916.67 $34.584.47 $67.953.65 $11,398.35 $2,612.08 $5,132.36 $8978.6 $2,057.56 $4,042.81 $7,959.74 $1,824.08 $3,584.05 Total $301,044.41 $253.464.80 $19,142.79 $15,078.96 $13,367.87 2005 MUSA Bid -Package #2 Assessable Area acre 51.22 42.32 3.58 2.82 2.50 Assessments(Preliminary) Roadwa /Storm Drainage Trunk Watermain Trunk Sanitary Sewer $941,985.69 $65.437.04 $94,663,40 $778,306.02 $54.066.68 $78.214.66 $65,839.69 $4.573.69 $6.616.46 $51.862.55 $3,602.74 $5,211.85 $45.977.44 $3.193.92 $4,620A3 Total $1,102,086A3 $910,687.37 $77,029.84 $60.677.14 $63,791.79 Total Property Area 1 and 2 Total Assessments $1,591,789.99 $1,322,878.01 Area 3 Area 4 Area 5 $108,169.09 $85,205.82 $75,537.07 ME J SECOND AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT TIIS SECOND AMENDMENT, made and entered into this 2-9 9- day of �►�-` i , 2006, by and between PETERSON-JACQUES FARM LAND COMPANY, LLC ("Seller") and JOHN C. KNOBLAUCH or permitted assigns ("Buyer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer entered into a Purchase Agreement dated May 18, 2006, as amended July 18, 2006 ("Purchase Agreement") regarding the sale of certain single, family lots and outlots as described in the Purchase Agreement covering property in Carver County, Minnesota ("Property"); and WHEREAS, Seller had agreed, pursuant to Paragraph 7B of the Purchase Agreement, to deliver to the Title Company an executed Escrow Agreement and related letters to consultants; and WHEREAS, Seller has negotiated with D.R. Horton, Inc. -Minnesota for a Reimbursement Agreement in lieu of the Escrow Agreement, and Buyer is agreeable to such substitution; and WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer wish to amend the Purchase Agreement on the terms and conditions hereinafter provided; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties as follows: Paragraph 7B and Exhibit C shall be deleted from the Purchase Agreement. 2. The following shall be substituted in lieu of Paragraph 7B: "7B Seller has delivered to Buyer a fully -executed Reimbursement Agreement between Seller and D.R. Horton, a copy, of which is attached to this Second Amendment as Exhibit L This contingency shall be deemed to have been satisfied. Seller agrees, at Closing, or within thirty (30) days of Buyer obtaining final plat approval of Pioneer Pass (provided that the Closing has not occurred through the default of Buyer) to pay D.R. Horton, pursuant to the terms of the Reimbursement Agreement, the sum of Sixty-eight Thousand Forty-eight and 72/100 Dollars ($68,048.72). Seller further agrees, at Closing, to transfer all right, title and interest in and to the Consultant's Work, as defined in the Reimbursement Agreement, to Buyer. 3. This Second Amendment will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 4. Except as amended or modified herein, the Purchase Agreement is in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed. Doc# 2167144kl 5. This document may be executed in separate counterparts, each of which and all together will constitute this document in its entirety. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment as of the day and year first above written. SELLER: PETERSON-JACQUES FARM LAND COMPANY, LLC By. Its: BUYER: John Krfoblauch Doc# 2167144\1 SEP-19-2006 16:24 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.01i02 T. v. 3B. W. Jl. a2. a2. JJ. a0. s0. N. ee. 09. 50. $1. 52. 53. 5e. &L No. 5' 58, 59 60. el 62. OX ullwNrA. co. • v..w. MN u11.f.1fu Farm 1619A 112 PURCHASE AGREEMENT lha lwm aW.yed WtM MWxaala Aaaeni)een of ILFALTORV, wwa. dfaaa6u any O"sy ad" ON a u11 w mNae of INa foal,. • 2Ws, NBNHwu Aeawiallon of flFALT0R4•. Fdlru. AW 1. Gate 11eL__.i3006 2. P40I Ot .__.__._____. Pape mcg OF aIOtLn C. Knebiaueh 1•BOver•1 rhaatm al One Hundred Thousand d 00/'00------------------•._. r -- ONWa 14 100, 000. 00---- ) W ��T � ONSON u uaH G NO" as urwt manse to as dxaAled Lamism .Ov.rra of n.arxe AywmNu W u battles, m w Mlata dm INr( OIt. dn, .Mr sa•mtmw. in in. rmaa a.- of metlrq wake, lea x Oe m mness, to Bras., 0 Fwdxaa Awsemmru wI eaaaaw W a.w. a.d aam.at mwr.y N om awanl Ise in. aOrmx• a Ifu poem Ianed au Leapt Addy. Gty N Chanhaaaen Owgyy. qI Carver MkM taLeapo, plat Pionater si 1 3 C it Iota old [1 Fe S and F a8�D4N'^_4G plat oC Pioneer Pasa attached Co this Addend (•Pzoo y•) ENden WOE pNM; alnake W Irax: ves. asN: Nwm O)Nf: aweNn ant aWNpe: We. anadse; bIn � J ant MW ax hea.,y redo; a"Nahed NahtYlq (notes. eM WON pit," INlwx; pal., Moan M "pe enY butrara, lmfa, nokws ant oOw vaMPmFn u•1d as cemxllm WenwhN; WXa ah .offIaN, aaulpmm •� a sit I e)Ilemr:[]OWlIEd1nF �NONf: brrih;n hulnlelw and dMumlallar: Jews Sam tart' a ( Nu wowvry a sepuLl .wro Puma: anxMd7imat mne.: --N TO AcM and aslnq; BIMT-1 wu�batl daaaW: vaN eamaaalwl; wane; cwf xo e1Wse; MuOwan• aaax; Now Ixa; TY"INI t upednq; initiate: Iaraa door nOwlwl and NI control.; am.k. seiseWa: IInOAce swawv; M or wnlab NopMY2eWr 11u IHa OW pxed to arYlb elNNbaNna119..ii.YaiiYaDQ........................... 1 Nine Million and 00/100------------ -Man Buyer aweea to aY N any IeNaaet,.. navy. ant Owop, rM aaN amaunl aseNed agailal grls POa•rlY p Iilrt, I �xm IW W the JOIN POa. Such Iwnci" wdl be !Neck oa a waked, or s feel nlsre0e0a sam sWwlfinx freMbw x sea Ne Of xewo II Is NOT, tea cwfN of Bu'.,'a pawn'. If are, ruy n1J slip( 9uyn'a swun, ao sbe appbepN.l TNJ PVraJ11x Apaammin � NDT uhArt lea cNNaOetbn al a xn PNNJJJ Apaamant daaW mill 01 araawN A W. sent emcNAOw mpl I ar Ihm 20. . If faW aNa14Nse Is Not oaw(W said aloe. WsMae .Buyer NN BWIdN Ines :rmad4aafY s;w. a capasetim el PurN. Apelmml awfirminq saw cancefatior, ?INS Fleallxa Awxrn.,taU II K NOT one sion a a Vuallt LalaE AddeMmi fit anawar N N. Noe mwnad AddarrAagf Buy., neat am -lpM am.) - Saar -I or eac se when closed DSLaaMRKRAR! TRLL: Upon aatlormKa W "I. Solar ahaJ daWat L.1 WaraNey Owtl rrm�.g.- NINE - JKaee to W aaae. It my, wneayip "Adiftmble We. stblaat is; faaseY anal IAI buitlnq ant aONnq 4+.e. wIXnewu, n•u ant IIWrp egWOena: IBf realneliana raNOry 10 uaa w MarMmanl a tM apany widaut •IkaNe farlahwa plavYlma: I0 amewubn of any meeral notice by tM Suu of Mlnnaaxs: IDI u1Sy and drelnege oeaNnsnta bdden m may 'aim den wiS eoa6tq imporsraaa; IFd HDMa et terea•a u NYawa Mdlx perinea nat s1OMCI p tanN Jed: None: t PI City o2 C11aMnSSen epnE2eF on�.�or CSna3 D)AS. 9D2;?'ae 1, of?Lon _•,._,______.-_�_-_.- _ .... LFIOS.,s(asun M sfsI In wmbibL: Other maCtera_not obieeced to -by.. Duyet__ _._.. INwL uN I•Naeawma aYlMln of wNN 4 tapfred Ie a raw' al Ito abavp d tNs s W. aUYlA AND SR.LDI .NAIL MIGRATE AS Of TW DAYS OF MOIINO ❑ OF CLOW13 m W ulynmu aUVM NQLL ASSUNE 'yj SELLER SHALL PAY a aus el time in., IVaeIN uulamanu N+iaa a of Ito Mta N in. Agrow ." ate a141 BUYER MALL AfSNML SELLHI SHALL MR FAYNNT OF taMal amaamen a aaMirx u of into data a ins Apumsm Ise enpoWrtenla 1 n crdar•d by any aanuleB w WhIms. Ral.r's yaov p o for aymex aowl be by CaYmint nto laubw of I. ISI rl s1alTnad am0aa al DN ataaaemmu N Nu. as aae.RM W Byawr'• Lend•,.I BWN enY Iano cosset x... oeYaW in Ito yaat Weaning rleeinq Arid atxrxllN. ant "Vann, of wNaa is no, a enni. seat any date of IIrN A,,..,. SaJea uaxlanls :nal SafwQ HAS O NAS NOT rxlivem a node• rage,dfq my new la w) .., �IaM1.+M- Velacl Iron any asuufp aWnwWx. Ito )bW a +Akn walsSl rrW a )uaJwd apRlat UH PearW. Any Jlrpl lghOr raSaYad by 5ai+r tar the daaa )I Iwo 1-ahsx AOe man' Nt, Mlwe dump atoll M po n boo to Iuwr bwwtliaufy. rat) Nrarxt Awanmma Nq an as, axm Ito data •1 daelnq, rise :M )mae m,' apse bl wMNrq. wr CbYfrp. Ia )W. poYda W, iM aymenr at. w xwme Ito faaal xx)arxnla. In In1 )w emml. an. party m)Y daelax in. Purauw Awxmmt unxxd by MVhl. Mlla le Na 0 . rq'aNnlfrq as aaWgp d4 an. any. as ~ C)x INN Attmax Aweament 'u (once INn IIr4 Moax Awsemer, unaaled. Stye, art, Santa shall immsi most a unceMtim of at eronay aN M1e�xiy.,. MN:PA•afSMi SEP-19-2006 16:25 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.02/02 AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT, made and entered into this day of July, 2006, by and between Peterson -Jacques Farm Land Company, LLC ("Seller") and John C. Knoblauch or Permitted Assigns (`Buyer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer entered into a Purchase Agreement ("Purchase Agreement") dated May 18, 2006, regarding the sale of certain single family lots and outlots as shown on the preliminary plat of Pioneer Pass, Carver County, Minnesota ("Property"); and WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer desire to void a prior Addendum and an Amendment to the Purchase Agreement and replace said Addendum and Amendment with this Amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed by and between Seller and Buyer that the Purchase Agreement be amended as follows: I. The prior Addendum and Amendment to the Purchase Agreement shall be null and void and replaced with this Amendment. 2. The Purchase Price on Page 1 of the Purchase Agreement shall be changed from Nine Million and 00/100 Dollars $9,000,000.00) to Six Million Nine Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($6,900,000.00). 3. Purchase Price. Seller has agreed to sell to Buyer and Buyer has agreed to purchase from Seller the Property for the sum of Six Million Nine Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($6,900,000.00), which Buyer agrees to pay in the following manner. An initial One Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($100,000.00) as earnest money ("initial Earnest Money"), which Seller acknowledges receiving upon execution of the Purchase Agreement on May 18, 2006; an additional earnest money payment ("Additional Earnest Money Payment") of One Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($150,000.00) to be deposited with Carver County Abstract ("Title Company's within three (3) days of all parties executing this Amendment; and an additional Four Million Nine Hundred Thirty-five Thousand Two Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($4,935,200.00) on the closing of Phase I. The remaining Purchase Price of One Million Seven Hundred Fourteen Thousand Eight Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,714,800.00) shall be paid on the closing of Phase 11. The Additional Earnest Money Payment and the Initial Earnest Money shall become non-refundable and shall be paid by Title Company to Seller upon satisfaction of the contingencies in Paragraph 7 of this Purchase Agreement. The Purchase Price contemplates that Phase I will contain fifty-three (53) single family lots, two (2) outlots and a to -be -created outlot of approximately 27,000 square feet and Phase II twenty-eight (28) single family lots, as shown on the preliminary plat of Pioneer Pass, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Attached as Exhibit -1 is a listing of the lots in each Phase. The division of the plat into phases shall be subject to the approval of the City of Chanhassen, if the City approval results in a different number of lots in the first phase the allocation of the number of lots in each phase shall be adjusted accordingly. If the number of lots is changed by the City, DwA 21633272 TOTAL P.02 Message Page 1 of 2 Hoffman, Todd From: Generous, Bob Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 10:21 AM To: Hoffman, Todd Cc: Fauske, Alyson Subject: RE: Pioneer Pass, Carver County, Minnesota Todd: The park is designated as Outlot D on the plat. We will need to modify the condition of the DC, condition 8. E. 1., to mirror this. The developer shall designate a 4.72 acre neighborhood park site, Outlot D. This property shall be transferred to the city by warranty deed with 3.79 acres of the site being dedicated by the applicant/owner and the remaining 0.93 acres being purchased by the City of Chanhassen. The city shall compensate the current fee owner $169,986.76 in total compensation for said 0.93 acres. The transfer of the above property shall satisfy all park dedication requirements for Phase I and Phase 2 of the development, and no additional park fees will be required at time of building permit. :e From: Hoffman, Todd Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 8:31 AM To: Aanenson, Kate; Generous, Bob; Gerhardt, Todd; Fauske, Alyson; Sticha, Greg Subject: FW: Pioneer Pass, Carver County, Minnesota Good morning Prior to calling Andrea can you please double check the information in the letter from the Peterson -Jacques attorney. The purchase price is correct — is Outlot D the correct designation? Any issues with wiring the money? Anything else? Thanks Todd H From: Andrea McDowell Poehler [mailto:AMcDowellPoehler@ck-law.com] Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 4:48 PM To: Hoffman, Todd Subject: FW: Pioneer Pass, Carver County, Minnesota Todd: Please review email from attorney re: Pioneer Pass deed and easement and call me to discuss. Andrea -----Original Message ----- From: Deborah L. Stowe [mailto:dstowe@lindquist.com] Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 4:21 PM To: Andrea McDowell Poehler 11/27/2006 Message Page 2 of 2 Subject: Pioneer Pass, Carver County, Minnesota The attached document is being sent on behalf of Bruce G. Odlaug. Andrea, Attached for your review is a proposed letter regarding Outlot D (Park). I will send you a copy of the proposed deed as soon as completed. Any comments please let me know. I will also send you a proposed conservation easement for Outlot E. Do you have any problem with my adding a provision that the easement does not grant any rights to the public on the subject property. Thanks. IRS Circular 230 Notice: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that, except to the extent expressly provided to the contrary, any federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Intemal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. For more information about this notice, see http://www.lindquist.com 11/27/2006 ' UNDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P. 4200IDS CENTER IN DENVER: 80 SOUTH EIGH STREET 60017TH STREET, SUITE 1800 SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2274 DENVER. CO 80202-5441 TELEPHONE: 612-371-3211 TELEPHONE: 303-573-5900 FAX: 612-371-3207 FAX: 303-573-1956 ATTORNEYS AT LAw BRUCE G. ODLAUG (612) 371-5792 bodlaug ® lindquist.com September 29, 2006 Carver County Abstract and Title Co., Inc. 411 Chestnut Street North Chaska, MN 55318 Re: Pioneer Pass, Carver County Minnesota Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: w .lindquistcom We are the attorneys for Peterson -Jacques Farm Land Company, LLC. Our client is in the process of selling to Pioneer Pass, LLC certain property in Carver County, Minnesota that is being platted as Pioneer Pass. The City of Chanhassen ("City") is requiring, as park dedication in connection with plat approval, the transfer to the City by Warranty Deed of a 3.79-acre site. In addition, the City is purchasing from our client an additional 0.93 acres adjacent to the 3.79 acres being dedicated for park purposes. The City is paying as the purchase price for the 0.93 acres the sum of $169,986.76. The 3.79 acre and 0.93 acre parcels are being platted as Outlot D, Pioneer Pass. Enclosed is a fully executed Warranty Deed from our client to the City covering Outlot D. This Deed is delivered to you in trust pending your receipt from the City of the purchase price of $169,986.76. State deed tax in the sum of $561.00 should be deducted from the purchase price and the balance of $169,425.76 wired to our client per wiring instructions previously delivered to you. The cost of recording the Deed should be the obligation of the City. If this transaction has not been completed by October 31, 2006, the Deed should be returned to the undersigned. If you have any questions please call. Very truly yours, LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P. Bruce G. Odlaug BGO/dls Enclosures Doc# 2186989\1 Message Hoffman, Todd From: Hoffman, Todd l Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 1:45 PM To: 'Andrea McDowell Poehler' Subject: RE: Pioneer Park Acquisition Hi Andrea The owner is dedicating 3.79 acres in lieu of paying park dedication charges. purchased by the City at the cost of $218,550. No donation is being made. Todd From: Andrea McDowell Poehler [mailto:AMcDowellPoe rock-law.com] Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 12:30 PM // To: Hoffman, Todd Subject: RE: Pioneer Park Acquisition ! r Page 1 of 2 L' F' The remaining p es is being I� Y / / Do we have a valuation of the property? Is the City going to be executing the IR form for donation Andrea Original Message----- From: Hoffman, Todd [mailto:thoffman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us] U ( I Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 4:24 PM I To: Andrea McDowell Poehler IY Cc: Gerhardt, Todd; Sticha, Greg Subject: RE: Pioneer Park Acquisition Hi Andrea ��jI1 Let's go with the title insurance. You can contact Greg Sticha, our Finance Director, to have a check cut for closing. I can transport it to the Closing for you if need be. Greg's direct number is 227-1149. Thank you Todd Hoffman From: Andrea McDowell Poehler [mailto:AMcDowellPoehler@ck-law.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 3:31 PM To: Hoffman, Todd Subject: FW: Pioneer Park Acquisition Todd: /21�010 / 1 v I will be handling the acquisition. ouple of items: 1) Does the City intend to purchase ti surance for the property (I recommend it); 2) 1 will sue* *� +h TMi t + T ^+ a� I recieve it with the dollars to be paid by the City and charges in connection with the closing, is there a deadline by which the City needs the final amoutn in order to cut the check (sometimes, the settlement statement is being changed right up to the day of closing)? 3) Who do I make the request for funds for the closing to? Andrea ^, Andrea McDowell Poehler I 7-17 CAMPBELL ICK NUTSON, P.A. Suite 317 -- Eagandale Office Center ; 9/25/2006 [ Message Page 2 of 2 _r 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 (651) 234-6224 apoehle ek-law.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Ifyou have received this transmission in error, please immediatelvnodfv the Sender and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. Disclaimer Regarding Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Mintz. Star 55325L.01-19) ("UETA"): Ifthis communication concerns negotiation of contract or agreement, UETA does not apply to this communication. Contract formation in this matter shall occur only with manually-aA4xed original signatures on original documents. This email is not, nor shall it be deemed to be, legal advice or counsel, unless the recipient alreadv has an attomev-etientreladonship with the firm orme. 7Ws e-mail does not create an attorney-clientrc,aoonship. -----Original Message ----- From: Roger Knutson Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 3:19 PM To: Andrea McDowell Poehler Subject: FW: Pioneer Park Acquisition Can you take care of this please? -----Original Message ----- From: Hoffman, Todd[mailto:thoffman@ci.chanhassen.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 1:41 PM To: Roger Knutson Cc: Gerhardt, Todd; Aanenson, Kate; Sticha, Greg; Oehme, Paul Subject: Pioneer Park Acquisition Hi Roger I forwarded a voice mail to you from John Chadwick. Mr. Chadwick works for Sever Peterson and is assisting him in he sale of his property in Chanhassen. The voice mail contains the name and contact information for Sever's attorney. In a separate voicemail Mr. Chadwick informed me that the transfer of the parkland to the City will be from the Peterson/Jacques LLC. He also said that the title work is with Carver County Abstract and that their closing with the development LLC is scheduled for next Thursday. Please take the necessary steps to ensure that the City receives title to the 4.72 acre park site as a part of these transactions. Listed below is the condition in the DC related to this transfer. Let me know what you need from us. The following is the condition regarding the park in the development contract: The developer shall designate a 4.72 acre neighborhood park site, Outlot D. This property shall be transferred to the city by warranty deed with 3.79 acres of the site being dedicated by the applicantlowner and the remaining 0.93 acres being purchased by the City of Chanhassen. The city shall compensate the owner/applicant $218,550 in total compensation for said 0.93 acres Thanks Roger. Todd H 9/25/2006 r I 9L�Q LM941.9) s(LO 4 -) 943.2 12 EOF/H. 11 4" 942 60 44.1 42.9 41.3 I I 3� 1� s� a _ 44 too' Yo I 35.118 IN I \� 0b` ' LUFF CREEK DRIVE _ \ \ \ 8' — 1v0>c 41 /H - J J Lp 11 (.. EXISTING WETLAND H_Of x� k PROPOSED T1 -OUT CURB & GUTTER 2 25 PACT / i \ \ TC TC i, A=20.473 . . / / i 4 a \ \ 3.94 \ 43.30'. / rn bl- \43.80 ` 4 .21 TC 5' 42.9 A ETBALL -7.0 50 h 3.47 \ 0.70 ^; '.� �� TC \ \ \42.6 �\ \\ rn 8.63 \ 1 co I \ 1 G BEGIN C ST: \` \\ —/ / i \\ / ) i i �✓ 0. 1+57.70 f SO �CER FIELD /> / /-' i / /, / // p / 4 RETAu pill IjLAYGROUND I AREA / / / / / / / / / // \S #7 Ile \ EXISTING WE ND H ACT (BY OTHERS Nil OZ6— 'r- f 1 Hoffman, Todd From: Gerhardt, Todd Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 2:24 PM To: Hoffman, Todd; Oehme, Paul Subject: FW: Message from Chadwick Pioneer Pass Paul and Todd FYI ... It you have any questions let me know. TG From: Roostedec@aol.com [mailto:Roostedec@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 11:54 AM To: Gerhardt, Todd Cc: bodlaug@lindquist.com Subject: Message from Chadwick Pioneer Pass Todd, How are you. Sorry we did not get more chance to visit last night. It was busy and things are moving forward. That is the good news. 1. 1 think we may need to change "dedicate" to some other word when it comes to the Bluff Creek areas. The whole donation deal is one we want to do, but I think the attorney for Sever needs to help us so we get the desired result. It will be a transfer in fee rather than just an easement. Also since there will be pond construction in that area, what is the timing on that. After the pond is constructed, since that will be a City maintained pond anyway. I am open and just want to do the right thing. 2. The park purchase if it is to match to the contract should be 235,000 per acre plus a price escalation of 7plus a price escalation of 7%r annum from August 25, 2005 until the date of closing. This will then be consistent with the contract. All simple things. Also I let Kate know that there are 82 lots rather than 81 so there will be a bit more in fee revenue for the City. It is all a wash, I suspect. Thanks for everything. Regards, John E. Chadwick 11430 Zion Circle Bloomington, MN 55437 Office 952-853-2473 Fax TOLL FREE (866) 734-3621 This email and attachment(s) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify me immediately by return email or telephone and delete/destroy the message and any copies thereof. SCANNED 3/16/2006 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 425 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning approximately 43 acres of property within the Plat for Pioneer Pass except for Outlots A, B, E, F and G, Pioneer Pass, from Agricultural Estate District, A2, to Residential Low and Medium Density District, RLM. Section 2. The rezoning of this property is subject to all conditions of City Council approval including final plat approval for Pioneer Pass. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning herein above provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 24"' day of April, 2006. T dt, City Manager Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on October 5, 2006) 0 SCANNED a 6G-6g CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 2006 Mayor Furlong called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Councilman Lundquist, Councilman Peterson and Councilwoman Tjornhom STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Roger Knutson, Laurie Hokkanen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, and Todd Hoffman PUBLIC PRESENT FOR ALL ITEMS: Debbie Lloyd Janet Paulsen Glenn Stolar PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: 7302 Laredo Drive 7305 Laredo Drive Park and Recreation Commission Mayor Furlong: Thank you and good evening to everyone. We're glad that you joined us here in the council chambers as well as those watching at home. At this time I would ask if there's any modifications or changes to the agenda? If not, without objection we'll proceed with the agenda that was published with the packet. CONSENT AGENDA: Mayor Furlong: If there's a desire by members of council or others present to remove an item for discussion, we can do that prior to that motion being made. So at this time I would ask, Item l(g)(2) is it Mr. Gerhardt? l(g)? Well pull that off on a single. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah, we just want to add the language, not to exceed $218,550 for the park dedication fee. Mayor Furlong: And that's condition number? Todd Gerhardt: (g)(1). Mayor Furlong: Final plat approval. With condition on the? Todd Gerhardt: 8. Sorry. Mayor Furlong: 8? Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Page 18 of the planning report. M City Council Meeting - September 25, 2006 Mayor Furlong: Was that clear to everybody? Okay? So that will continue on the consent agenda unless there's a desire for separate discussion. Todd Gerhardt: Staff talked to the applicant and they have accepted that condition. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright. Is there any other items on the consent agenda? Items 1 (a) through (n) as in Nancy. That anyone would like to discuss separately. Seeing no one, is there a motion to approve items I(a) through (n) with the added language for item (g). Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman Lundquist seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: a. Approval of Minutes: -City Council Work Session Minutes dated August 28, 2006 -City Council Summary and Verbatim Minutes dated August 28, 2006 Receive Commission Minutes: -Planning Commission Summary and Verbatim Minutes dated August 15, 2006 -Planning Commission Summary and Verbatim Minutes dated September 5, 2006 -Park and Recreation Commission Summary and Verbatim Minutes dated August 22, 2006 b. TH 312/212 Project 03-09: Approve MnDot Change Orders with MnDot: 1) Turn Lane for Proposed Future Fire Station. 2) Changing Signal Lighting from Cobra Head to Shoe Box Fixtures C. Resolution #2006-65: Dogwood Road Improvements Project 06-06: Award Consultant Contract to Kimley-Horn. e. Resolution #2006-66: Longacres Drive Stormwater Pond Outlet Improvement & Lyman Boulevard Sewer Repair Projects 06-08 and 06009: Award of Contract. f. Boulder Cove: 1) Final Plat Approval 2) Approval of Plans & Specifications and Development Contract g. Pioneer Pass: 1) Final Plat Approval as amended in condition 8. 2) Approval of Plans & Specifications and Development Contract. h. Resolution #2006-67: 2007 Street Reconstruction (Koehnen & Yosemite Area) Project 07-01: Approve Amendment to Consultant Contract with Bolton & Menk. Metropolitan Council Building communities that work June 19, 2006 Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: City of Chanhassen, Pioneer Pass Amendment — Waiver Metropolitan Council Review File No. 16500-12 Metropolitan Council District 4 (Julius Smith, 952-443-2430) Dear Mr. Generous: N. RECEDED JUN 21 2006 CITY OF CHANHASSEN The Metropolitan Council received the City's Pioneer Pass plan amendment on May 3, 2006. The amendment proposes to change the land use designation for approximately 42 acres located north of Pioneer Trail at future highway 312 from Medium Density Residential and Office/Industrial to Low Density Residential. The net density of the project is 2.88. City's average density since 2000 has been 5.1. As the parcel is less than 80 acres and under 100 units proposed, the amendment meets the administrative review waiver guidelines. Council staff finds that the amendment is in conformance with metropolitan system plans, consistent with the Regional Development Framework, and has no impact on the plans of other units of local government. Council staff also finds that this amendment meets the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Administrative Review Guidelines adopted by the Council on May 11, 2005. Therefore, the Council waives further action on this review and the City may place this amendment into effect immediately. The amendment, explanatory materials supplied and the information submission form will be appended to the City's Plan in the Council's files. If you have any questions about this review, please contact Tom Caswell, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1319. Manager Assistance cc: Julius Smith, Metropolitan Council District 4 Jim Uttley, Sector Representative Carver County Paul Hkftnr GlS CheryIOlsen, Reviews Coordinator ..: cl 1. V:UtEVIEwS\Com miitie k.Cl nha m\C'hanhassen 2006 CPA -Pioneer Pass •waiver 16500-12.doc SCANNER w .metrocounclLorg Metro Info 11ne 602-1888 230 East Fifth Street • St Paul, Minnesota 55101-1626 • (651) 602-1000 • Fax 602-1550 • TIY 291-0904 M Equal Oppo fty Ernpioyer A. CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FAX (952) 227-1110 TO: Campbell Knutson, PA 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE JOB NO. 9/26/06 06-09 ATTENTION Sue Nelson RE: Document Recording ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Request ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 4/24/06 06-09 Conditional Use Permit for Pioneer Pass THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return ® For Recording ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO: John Knoblauch, Pioneer Pass LLC Terry Schneider, Project Developers, Inc. John Chadwick copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. SCANNED A CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, NIINNESOTA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 06-09 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for the following use: Peterson Jacques Farm to develop "Pioneer Pass", an 81-lot single-family home development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District with a variance for encroachment into the primary zone to construct a storm water pond. 2. Property. The permit is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as follows: All that property within the Plat of Pioneer Pass 3. Conditions. The permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a. Dedication of Outlots A and G shall be made to the city or a conservation easement shall be established over said outlots. b. Any areas on the property that meet the City's criteria for bluffs (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe) shall be preserved. In addition, all structures shall maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). The plans shall be revised to show any areas meeting the City's bluff criteria. c. No alterations shall be permitted within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor without a variance. All structures must meet the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. ,i 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: April 24, 2006 CITY OF CHANHASSEN IM (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 50'day of /, 2006, by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTbAY PUBUC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen - KAREN J. ENGELHARDT 7700 Market Boulevard Notary Public -Minnesota �.�. Chanhassen, MN 55317 ^+yam^M!"im EIPM JW37,zo10 (952)227-1100 2S Subcatchment 2 ""Sub cat Reach kon�j Link .\J Subcatchment CITYOF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED FEB 0 3 2006 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT 3S Subcatchment 3 SCANNED EXISTING 1-16-06 Type 1124-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 2 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Svstems 2/3/2006 Subcatchment 1S: Subcatchment 1 Runoff = 20.41 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 1.701 af, Depth= 0.62" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Area (ac) CN Description 2.790 61 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG B 5.170 85 Wetland 0.980 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 24.090 78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 33.030 77 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.3 2,440 0.1220 2.0 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment 2S: Subcatchment 2 Runoff = 3.29 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.154 af, Depth= 0.66" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.3(1" Area (ac) CN Description 2.640 78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 0.160 85 Wetland 2.800 78 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity iin) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) 5.7 315 0.0555 0.9 Description Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment 3S: Subcatchment 3 Runoff = 18.78 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 1.285 af, Depth= 0.62" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.39' Area (ac) CN Description 23.360 78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 0.260 85 Wetland 1.330 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 24.950 77 Weighted Average EXISTING 1-16-06 Prepared by {enter your company name here} HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 ADDlied P Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 14.6 1,180 0.0740 1.3 Lag/CN Method, Type 11 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Page 3 EXISTING 1-16-06 Type // 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Prepared by (enter your company name here} Page 3 Subcatchment 1S: Subcatchment 1 Runoff = 29.94 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 2.391 af, Depth= 0.8T' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type It 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.7(7' Area (ac) CN Description 2.790 61 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG B 5.170 85 Wetland 0.980 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 24.090 78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 33.030 77 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope min) (feet) (ft/ft) 20.3 2,440 0.1220 Velocity Capacity Description 2.0 LagICN Method, Subcatchment 2S: Subcatchment 2 Runoff = 4.64 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume= 0.215 af, Depth= 0.92" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Area (ac) CN Description 2.640 78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 0.160 85 Wetland 2.800 78 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity iin) (feet) (ftfft) (ft/sec) 5.7 315 0.0555 0.9 Description Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment 3S: Subcatchment 3 Runoff = 27.36 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 1.806 af, Depth= 0.87 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Area (ac) CN Description 23.360 78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 0.260 85 Wetland 1.330 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 24.950 77 Weighted Average EXISTING 1-16-06 Prepared by {enter your company name Tc Length Description 14.6 1,180 0.0740 1.3 LagICN Method, Type 1124-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Page 4 EXISTING 1-16-06 Type 1124-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 4 HvdroCAE)D 7.00 s/n 000744 n 1986-9003 Annlied Mirronmmnuter Svstems 9/3/9008 Subcatchment 1 S: Subcatchment 1 Runoff = 71.31 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 5.421 af, Depth= 1.97' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 2.790 61 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG B 5.170 85 Wetland 0.980 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 24.090 _78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 33.030 77 Weighted Average Tc Length Description 20.3 2,440 0.1220 2.0 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment 2S: Subcatchment 2 Runoff = 10.37 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.478 af, Depth= 2.05" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 2.640 78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 0.160 85 Wetland 2.800 78 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.7 315 0.0555 0.9 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment 3S: Subcatchment 3 Runoff = 64.39 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 4.095 af, Depth= 1.97 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 23.360 78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 0.260 85 Wetland 1.330 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 24.950 77 Weighted Average EXISTING 1-16-06 Type // 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 5 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 2/3/2006 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 14.6 1,180 0.0740 1.3 Lag/CN Method, EXISTING 1-16-06 Prepared by {enter your company name here} HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 000744 ©1986-2003 Applied A Type 1124-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Page 6 Subcatchment 1 S: Subcatchment 1 Runoff = 126.71 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 9.576 af, Depth= 3.48" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type It 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 2.790 61 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG B 5.170 85 Wetland 0.980 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 24.090 78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 33.030 77 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.3 2,440 0.1220 2.0 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment 2S: Subcatchment 2 Runoff = 17.82 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 0.835 af, Depth= 3.58" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 2.640 0.160 78 85 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B Wetland 2.800 78 Weighted Average Tc Length Description 5.7 315 0.0555 0.9 Lag/CN Method, Subcatchment 3S: Subcatchment 3 Runoff = 113.72 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 7.234 af, Depth= 3.48" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 23.360 78 Row crops, straight row, Good, HSG B 0.260 85 Wetland 1_.330 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 24.950 77 Weighted Average EXISTING 1-16-06 Type 1124-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 7 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs) 14.6 1,180 0.0740 1.3 Lag/CN Method, Pond 6 �subcaIt Reach !Pond, Lln� Pond 7 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED FEB 0 3 2006 CHANHASSEN PUNNING DEPT SCANNEC PROPOSED 1-16-06 Prepared by {enter your company name here} HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 000744 01986-2003 ADDlied h Type // 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Page 3 Subcatchment 1S: Subcatchment 1 Runoff = 4.02 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 0.467 af, Depth= 0.36" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Area (ac) CN Description 2.790 61 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG B 5.170 85 Wetland 0.980 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 0.420 98 Rooftops 6.060 61 >75% Grass cover. Good. HSG B 15.420 70 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 23.3 160 0.0185 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" Subcatchment 2S: Subcatchment 2 Runoff = 14.22 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.922 af, Depth= 0.46" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Area (ac) CN Description 3.210 98 Rooftops 2.180 98 Roadway 1.200 98 Driveway 0.320 98 Sidewalk 0.690 98 Open water 16.300 61 >75% Grass cover 23.900 73 Weighted Average Tc Length Description 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 6.7 125 0.2600 0.3 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 1.0 125 0.0200 2.1 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 2.5 755 5.0 Direct Entrv. Pipe flow Ca) 5 fps 11.2 1,005 Total PROPOSED 1-16-06 Prepared by {enter your company name HvdroCAD® 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 At Type 11 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Page 4 Subcatchment 3S: Subcatchment 3 Runoff = 0.72 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.040 af, Depth= 0.59' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 0.150 98 Rooftop 0.120 98 Roadway 0.040 98 Driveway 0.020 98 Sidewalk 0.640 61 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG B 0.970 74 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 7.6 70 0.0586 0.2 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 8.6 70 Total Subcatchment 4S: Subcatchment 4 Runoff = 0.61 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.024 af, Depth= 0.86' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Area (ac) CN Description 0.140 98 Roadway 0.050 98 Sidewalk _ 0.150 61 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG B 0.340 82 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 2.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 5S: Subcatchment 5 0.22 cfs @ 12.59 hrs, Volume= 0.080 af, Depth= 0.14" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type 1124-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 5 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 2/3/2006 Area (ac) CN Description 0.150 98 Rooftops 0.680 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 5.980 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 6.810 61 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope min) (feet) (fUft) 37.4 300 0.0200 Velocity Capacity Description 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" Subcatchment 6S: Subcatchment 6 Runoff = 4.85 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.260 af, Depth= 0.71" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Area (ac) CN Description 0.150 98 Rooftop 1.270 98 Roadway 0.100 98 Driveway 0.350 98 Sidewalk 0.330 98 Open water 2.220 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 4.420 79 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 5.7 40 0.0400 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 2.3 705 5.0 Direct Entrv. Pioe flow (a) 5 fos 9.1 745 Total Subcatchment 7S: Subcatchment 7 Runoff = 3.88 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.266 af, Depth= 0.40" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Area (ac) CN Description 0.750 98 Rooftop 0.680 98 Roadway 0.300 98 Driveway 0.110 98 Sidewalk 0.380 98 Open water 5.850 _ 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 8.070 71 Weighted Average PROPOSED 1-16-06 Prepared by {enter your company name Type 1124-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Page 6 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (in) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 8.5 55 0.0270 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 1.3 160 0.0200 2.1 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 1.1 345 5.0 Direct Entrv. Pine flow C& 5 fos 11.0 560 Total Subcatchment 8S: Subcatchment 8 Runoff = 0.14 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.020 af, Depth= 0.20" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Area (ac) CN Description 0.090 98 Rooftops 1.080 61 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG B 1.170 64 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fUft) (f /sec) (cfs) 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 13.6 85 0.0200 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 14.6 85 Total •I•Ti MA UM •=- 1 - VA Inflow Area = 23.900 ac, Inflow Depth = 0.46" for 1 year event Inflow = 14.22 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.922 of Outflow = 1.01 cfs @ 13.80 hrs, Volume= 0.900 af, Atten= 93%, Lag= 105.1 min Primary = 1.01 cfs @ 13.80 hrs, Volume= 0.900 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 866.50' Surf.Area= 0.690 ac Storage= 2.745 of Peak Elev= 867.02' @ 13.80 hrs Surf.Area= 0.728 ac Storage= 3.135 of (0.390 of above start) Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated) Center -of -Mass det. time= (not calculated) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 858.09 6.100 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type 1124-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 7 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 2/3/2006 Elevation (feet) Surf.Area (acres) Inc.Store (acre-feet) Cum.Store (acre-feet) 858.00 0.140 0.000 0.000 860.00 0.210 0.350 0.350 862.00 0.280 0.490 0.840 864.00 0.370 0.650 1.490 866.00 0.570 0.940 2.430 866.50 0.690 0.315 2.745 868.00 0.800 1.118 3.862 870.00 0.950 1.750 5.612 870.50 1.000 0.487 6.100 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 866.59 15.0" x 40.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 866.20' S= 0.0075 'P n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 2 Device 1 864.09 15.0" x 25.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 866.50' S=-0.1000 T n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max=1.01 cfs @ 13.80 hrs HW=867.02' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 1.01 cfs @ 3.1 fps) t2=Culvert (Passes 1.01 cfs of 1.20 cfs potential flow) Pond 6P: Pond 6 Inflow Area = 12.490 ac, Inflow Depth = 0.50" for 1 year event Inflow = 4.87 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.521 of Outflow = 0.57 cfs @ 13.91 hrs, Volume= 0.513 af, Atten= 88%, Lag= 113.5 min Primary = 0.57 cfs @ 13.91 hrs, Volume= 0.513 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 920.00' Surf.Area= 0.330 ac Storage= 1.430 of Peak Elev= 920.36 @ 13.91 hrs Surf.Area= 0.344 ac Storage= 1.562 of (0.132 of above start) Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated) Center -of -Mass det. time= (not calculated) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 912.00' 2.382 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 912.00 0.080 0.000 0.000 914.00 0.120 0.200 0.200 916.00 0.170 0.290 0.490 918.00 0.220 0.390 0.880 920.00 0.330 0.550 1.430 922.00 0.410 0.740 2.170 922.50 0.440 0.212 2.382 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 920.00' 18.0" x 20.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 919.80' S= 0.011007 n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type 1124-hr 1 year Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 8 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 2/3/2006 2 Device 1 918.00' 18.0" x 16.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 920.09 S= -0.1250 7 n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max=0.57 cfs @ 13.91 hrs HW=920.36' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.57 cfs @ 2.7 fps) t2=Culvert (Passes 0.57 cfs of 0.66 cfs potential flow) Pond 7P: Pond 7 Inflow Area = 8.070 ac, Inflow Depth = 0.49' for 1 year event Inflow = 3.88 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.266 of Outflow = 0.34 cfs @ 13.52 hrs, Volume= 0.261 af, Atten= 91 %, Lag= 87.9 min Primary = 0.34 cfs @ 13.52 hrs, Volume= 0.261 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 921.59 Surf.Area= 0.380 ac Storage=1.385 of Peak Elev= 921.76 @ 13.52 hrs Surf.Area= 0.390 ac Storage= 1.484 of (0.099 of above start) Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated) Center -of -Mass det. time= (not calculated) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 914.00' 2.620 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 914.00 0.080 0.000 0.000 916.00 0.120 0.200 0.200 918.00 0.180 0.300 0.500 920.00 0.240 0.420 0.920 921.50 0.380 0.465 1.385 922.00 0.400 0.195 1.580 924.00 0.640 1.040 2.620 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 921.50' 18.0" x 133.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 920.00' S= 0.0113'P n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 2 Device 1 919.50' 18.0" x 30.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 921.50' S=-0.0667'P n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max=0.34 cfs @ 13.52 hrs t1=Culvert ( Controls 0.34 cfs) t2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.34 cfs @ 1. HW=921.75' TW=920.36' (Dynamic Tailwater) 7 fps) PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type 11 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 9 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Svstems 2/3/2006 Time span=0.00-100.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 10001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Subcatchment 1 Runoff Area=15.420 ac Runoff Depth=0.55" Flow Length=160' Tc=23.3 min CN=70 Runoff=7.06 cfs 0.712 of Subcatchment 2S: Subcatchment 2 Runoff Area=23.900 ac Runoff Depth=0.68" Flow Length=1,005' Tc=11.2 min CN=73 Runoff=22.27 cfs 1.352 of Subcatchment 3S: Subcatchment 3 Runoff Area=0.970 ac Runoff Depth=0.72" Flow Length=70' Tc=8.6 min CN=74 Runoff=1.09 cfs 0.059 of Subcatchment 4S: Subcatchment 4 Runoff Area=0.340 ac Runoff Depth=1.15" Tc=2.0 min CN=82 Runoff=0.81 cfs 0.033 of Subcatchment 5S: Subcatchment 5 Runoff Area=6.810 ac Runoff Depth=0.26" Flow Length=300' Tc=37.4 min CN=61 Runoff=0.63 cfs 0.147 of Subcatchment 6S: Subcatchment 6 Runoff Area=4.420 ac Runoff Depth=0.97" Flow Length=745' Tc=9.1 min CN=79 Runoff=6.80 cfs 0.359 of Subcatchment 7S: Subcatchment 7 Runoff Area=8.070 ac Runoff Depth=0.59" Flow Length=560' Tc=11.0 min CN=71 Runoff=6.41 cfs 0.400 of Subcatchment 8S: Subcatchment 8 Runoff Area=1.170 ac Runoff Depth=0.34" Flow Length=85' Tc=14.6 min CN=64 Runoff=0.34 cfs 0.034 of Pond 2P: Pond 2 Peak EIev=867.25' Storage=3.305 of Inflow=22.27 cfs 1.352 of Outflow=1.90 cfs 1.330 of Pond 6P: Pond 6 Peak EIev=920.50' Storage=1.616 of Inflow=6.88 cfs 0.753 of Outflow=1.06 cfs 0.746 of Pond 7P: Pond 7 Peak EIev=921.87' Storage=1.530 of Inflow=6.41 cfs 0.400 of Outflow=0.71 cfs 0.394 of Total Runoff Area = 61.100 ac Runoff Volume = 3.094 of Average Runoff Depth = 0.61" PROPOSED 1-16-06 Prepared by {enter your company name Type 1124-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Page 10 Subcatchment 1S: Subcatchment 1 Runoff = 7.06 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.712 af, Depth= 0.55" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Area (ac) CN Description 2.790 61 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG B 5.170 85 Wetland 0.980 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 0.420 98 Rooftops 6.060 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 15.420 70 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (f /ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 23.3 160 0.0185 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" Subcatchment 2S: Subcatchment 2 Runoff = 22.27 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 1.352 af, Depth= 0.68" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Area (ac) CN Description 3.210 98 Rooftops 2.180 98 Roadway 1.200 98 Driveway 0.320 98 Sidewalk 0.690 98 Open water 16.300 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 23.900 73 Weighted Average Tc Length Description 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 6.7 125 0.2600 0.3 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 1.0 125 0.0200 2.1 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 2.5 755 5.0 Direct Entrv. Piue flow Caa 5 fps 11.2 1,005 Total PROPOSED 1-16-06 Prepared by {enter your company name here} HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied A Type 11 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Page 11 Subcatchment 3S: Subcatchment 3 Runoff = 1.09 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.059 af, Depth= 0.72" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Area (ac) CN Description 0.150 98 Rooftop 0.120 98 Roadway 0.040 98 Driveway 0.020 98 Sidewalk 0.640 61 >75% Grass cover. Good. HSG B 0.970 74 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description min (feet) (f /ft) (f /sec) (cfs) 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 7.6 70 0.0586 0.2 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 8.6 70 Total Subcatchment 4S: Subcatchment 4 Runoff = 0.81 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.033 af, Depth= 1.15" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Area (ac) CN Description 0.140 98 Roadway 0.050 98 Sidewalk 0.150 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.340 82 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 2.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 5S: Subcatchment 5 Runoff = 0.63 cfs @ 12.51 hrs, Volume= 0.147 af, Depth= 0.26" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type // 24-hr2 year Rainfall=2.70" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 12 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 2/3/2006 Area (ac) CN Description 0.150 98 Rooftops 0.680 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 5.980 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 6.810 61 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope min) (feet) (ft/ft) 37.4 300 0.0200 Velocity Capacity Description 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" Subcatchment 6S: Subcatchment 6 Runoff = 6.80 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.359 af, Depth= 0.97" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Area (ac) CN Description 0.150 98 Rooftop 1.270 98 Roadway 0.100 98 Driveway 0.350 98 Sidewalk 0.330 98 Open water 2.220 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 4.420 79 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Description 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 5.7 40 0.0400 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 2.3 705 5.0 Direct Entrv. Pine flow 0 5 fps 9.1 745 Total Subcatchment 7S: Subcatchment 7 Runoff = 6.41 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.400 af, Depth= 0.59" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Area (ac) CN Description 0.750 98 Rooftop 0.680 98 Roadway 0.300 98 Driveway 0.110 98 Sidewalk 0.380 98 Open water 5.850 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 8.070 71 Weighted Average PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type 1124-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 13 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 2/3/2006 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 8.5 55 0.0270 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 1.3 160 0.0200 2.1 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 1.1 345 5.0 Direct Entrv. PiDe flow 0 5 fos 11.0 560 Total Subcatchment 8S: Subcatchment 8 Runoff = 0.34 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.034 af, Depth= 0.34" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.7(7' Area (ac) CN Description 0.090 98 Rooftops 1.080 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 1.170 64 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 13.6 85 0.0200 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 14.6 85 Total Pond 2P: Pond 2 Inflow Area = 23.900 ac, Inflow Depth = 0.68" for 2 year event Inflow = 22.27 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 1.352 of Outflow = 1.90 cfs @ 13.13 hrs, Volume= 1.330 af, Atten= 91 %, Lag= 65.4 min Primary = 1.90 cfs @ 13.13 hrs, Volume= 1.330 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 866.59 Surf.Area= 0.690 ac Storage= 2.745 of Peak Elev= 867.25' @ 13.13 hrs Surf.Area= 0.745 ac Storage= 3.305 of (0.560 of above start) Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated) Center -of -Mass det. time= (not calculated) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 858.00' 6.100 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type 1124-hr2 year Rainfall=2.70" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 14 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 2/3/2006 Elevation (feet) Surf.Area (acres) Inc.Store (acre-feet) Cum.Store (acre-feet) 858.00 0.140 0.000 0.000 860.00 0.210 0.350 0.350 862.00 0.280 0.490 0.840 864.00 0.370 0.650 1.490 866.00 0.570 0.940 2.430 866.50 0.690 0.315 2.745 868.00 0.800 1.118 3.862 870.00 0.950 1.750 5.612 870.50 1.000 0.487 6.100 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 866.59 15.0" x 40.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 866.20' S= 0.0075 7 n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 2 Device 1 864.09 15.0" x 25.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 866.50' S= -0.1000 ? n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max=1.90 cfs @ 13.13 hrs HW=867.25' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 1.90 cfs @ 3.5 fps) t2=Culvert (Passes 1.90 cfs of 2.28 cfs potential flow) Pond 6P: Pond 6 Inflow Area = 12.490 ac, Inflow Depth = 0.72" for 2 year event Inflow = 6.88 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 0.753 of Outflow = 1.06 cfs @ 13.39 hrs, Volume= 0.746 af, Atten= 85%, Lag= 82.6 min Primary = 1.06 cfs @ 13.39 hrs, Volume= 0.746 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 920.00' Surf.Area= 0.330 ac Storage= 1.430 of Peak Elev= 920.50' @ 13.39 hrs Surf.Area= 0.350 ac Storage= 1.616 of (0.186 of above start) Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated) Center -of -Mass det. time= (not calculated) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 912.09 2.382 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 912.00 0.080 0.000 0.000 914.00 0.120 0.200 0.200 916.00 0.170 0.290 0.490 918.00 0.220 0.390 0.880 920.00 0.330 0.550 1.430 922.00 0.410 0.740 2.170 922.50 0.440 0.212 2.382 Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 920.09 18.0" x 20.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 919.80' S= 0.0100 7 n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 PROPOSED 1-16-06 by {enter your company name D 7.00 s/n 000744 © 19s6-9n03 At Type 11 24-hr 2 year Rainfall=2.70" Page 15 2 Device 1 918.00' 18.0" x 16.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 920.09 S=-0.1250'f n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max=1.06 cfs @ 13.39 hrs HW=920.50' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 1.06 cfs @ 3.1 fps) t-2=Culvert (Passes 1.06 cfs of 1.25 cfs potential flow) Pond 713: Pond 7 Inflow Area = 8.070 ac, Inflow Depth = 0.59' for 2 year event Inflow = 6.41 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.400 of Outflow = 0.71 cfs @ 12.81 hrs, Volume= 0.394 af, Atten= 891/6, Lag= 45.9 min Primary = 0.71 cfs @ 12.81 hrs, Volume= 0.394 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 921.50' Surf.Area= 0.380 ac Storage= 1.385 of Peak Elev= 921.8T @ 12.81 hrs Surf.Area= 0.395 ac Storage= 1.530 of (0.145 of above start) Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated) Center -of -Mass det. time= (not calculated) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 914.00' 2.620 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 914.00 0.080 0.000 0.000 916.00 0.120 0.200 0.200 918.00 0.180 0.300 0.500 920.00 0.240 0.420 0.920 921.50 0.380 0.465 1.385 922.00 0.400 0.195 1.580 924.00 0.640 1.040 2.620 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 921.50' 18.0" x 133.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 920.00' S= 0.0113 T n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 2 Device 1 919.50' 18.0" x 30.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 921.50' S=-0.0667'f n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max=0.71 cfs @ 12.81 hrs t-1=Culvert ( Controls 0.71 cfs) t-2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.71 cfs @ 2.1 HW=921.8T TW=920.49' (DynamicTailwater) fps) PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type 1124-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 16 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 2/3/2006 Time span=0.00-100.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 10001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Subcatchment 1 Runoff Area=15.420 ac Runoff Depth=1.46" Flow Length=160' Tc=23.3 min CN=70 Runoff=21.91 cfs 1.882 of Subcatchment 2S: Subcatchment 2 Runoff Area=23.900 ac Runoff Depth=1.67" Flow Length=1,005' Tc=11.2 min CN=73 Runoff=58.66 cfs 3.331 of Subcatchment 3S: Subcatchment 3 Runoff Area=0.970 ac Runoff Depth=1.74" Flow length=70' Tc=8.6 min CN=74 Runoff=2.75 cfs 0.141 of Subcatchment 4S: Subcatchment 4 Runoff Area=0.340 ac Runoff Depth=2.37" Tc=2.0 min CN=82 Runoff=1.65 cfs 0.067 of Subcatchment 5S: Subcatchment 5 Runoff Area=6.810 ac Runoff Depth=0.92" Flow Length=300' Tc=37.4 min CN=61 Runoff=3.76 cfs 0.520 of Subcatchment SS: Subcatchment 6 Runoff Area=4.420 ac Runoff Depth=2.13" Flow Length=745' Tc=9.1 min CN=79 Runoff=14.97 cfs 0.783 of Subcatchment 7S: Subcatchment 7 Runoff Area=8.070 ac Runoff Depth=1.53" Flow Length=560' Tc=11.0 min CN=71 Runoff=18.17 cfs 1.031 of Subcatchment 8S: Subcatchment 8 Runoff Area=1.170 ac Runoff Depth=1.09" Flow Length=85' Tc=14.6 min CN=64 Runoff=1.53 cfs 0.106 of Pond 2P: Pond 2 Peak Elev=868.42' Storage=4.227 of Inflow=58.66 cfs 3.331 of Outflow=6.21 cfs 3.308 of Pond 6P: Pond 6 Peak Elev=921.13' Storage=1.848 of Inflow=16.31 cfs 1.809 of Outflow=4.24 cfs 1.801 of Pond 7P: Pond 7 Peak Elev=922.38' Storage=1.776 of Inflow=18.17 cfs 1.031 of Outflow=3.31 cfs 1.026 of Total Runoff Area = 61.100 ac Runoff Volume = 7.862 of Average Runoff Depth =1.54" PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type 1124-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Page 17 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 2/3/2006 Subcatchment 1S: Subcatchment 1 Runoff = 21.91 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 1.882 af, Depth= 1.46" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.2(Y" Area (ac) CN Description 2.790 61 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG B 5.170 85 Wetland 0.980 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 0.420 98 Rooftops 6.060 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 15.420 70 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope min) (feet) (ft/ft) 23.3 160 0.0185 Description 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" Subcatchment 2S: Subcatchment 2 Runoff = 58.66 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 3.331 af, Depth= 1.6T' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 3.210 98 Rooftops 2.180 98 Roadway 1.200 98 Driveway 0.320 98 Sidewalk 0.690 98 Open water rass cover. Good. HSG B 23.900 73 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 6.7 125 0.2600 0.3 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 1.0 125 0.0200 2.1 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 2.5 755 5.0 Direct Entrv. Pipe flow (a) 5 fps 11.2 1,005 Total PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type I/ 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Page 18 HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 2/3/2006 Subcatchment 3S: Subcatchment 3 Runoff = 2.75 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.141 af, Depth= 1.74" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.217' Area (ac) CN Description 0.150 98 Rooftop 0.120 98 Roadway 0.040 98 Driveway 0.020 98 Sidewalk 0.640 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.970 74 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 7.6 70 0.0586 0.2 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 8.6 70 Total Subcatchment 4S: Subcatchment 4 Runoff = 1.65 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.067 af, Depth= 2.37' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.29' Area (ac) CN Description 0.140 98 Roadway 0.050 98 Sidewalk 0.150 61 >75% Grass cover. Good. HSG B 0.340 82 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 5S: Subcatchment 5 Runoff = 3.76 cfs @ 12.39 hrs, Volume= 0.520 af, Depth= 0.92" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" PROPOSED 1-16-06 Prepared by {enter your company name HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 000744 01986-2003 At Type /I 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Page 19 Area (ac) CN Description 0.150 98 Rooftops 0.680 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 5.980 61 >75% Grass cover, Good. HSG B 6.810 61 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope min) (feet) (ft/ft) 37.4 300 0.0200 Description 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" Subcatchment 6S: Subcatchment 6 Runoff = 14.97 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 0.783 af, Depth= 2.13" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 0.150 98 Rooftop 1.270 98 Roadway 0.100 98 Driveway 0.350 98 Sidewalk 0.330 98 Open water 2.220 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 4.420 79 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 5.7 40 0.0400 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 2.3 705 5.0 Direct Entrv. Pipe flow Cad 5 fos 9.1 745 Total Subcatchment 7S: Subcatchment 7 Runoff = 18.17 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 1.031 af, Depth= 1.53" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 0.750 98 Rooftop 0.680 98 Roadway 0.300 98 Driveway 0.110 98 Sidewalk 0.380 98 Open water 5.850 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 8.070 71 Weighted Average PROPOSED 1-16-06 Prepared by {enter your company name HvdroCADO 7.00 s/n 000744 n 19RS-9003 Ai Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description Type 11 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Page 20 8.5 55 0.0270 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 1.3 160 0.0200 2.1 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 1.1 345 5.0 Direct Entrv. Pine flow () 5 fos 11.0 560 Total Subcatchment 8S: Subcatchment 8 Runoff = 1.53 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.106 af, Depth= 1.09" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Area (ac) CN Description 0.090 98 Rooftops 1.080 61 >75% Grass cover. Good. HSG B 1.170 64 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 13.6 85 0.0200 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 14.6 85 Total Pond 2P: Pond 2 Inflow Area = 23.900 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.6T' for 10 year event Inflow = 58.66 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 3.331 of Outflow = 6.21 cfs @ 12.63 hrs, Volume= 3.308 af, Atten= 89%, Lag= 35.9 min Primary = 6.21 cfs @ 12.63 hrs, Volume= 3.308 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 866.59 Surf.Area= 0.690 ac Storage= 2.745 of Peak Elev= 868.42' @ 12.63 hrs Surf.Area= 0.831 ac Storage= 4.227 of (1.482 of above start) Plug -Flow detention time=1,070.1 min calculated for 0.563 of (17% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 224.1 min ( 1,074.7 - 850.6 ) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 858.00' 6.100 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type 1124-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 21 HydroCADO 7.00 sin 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 2/3/2006 Elevation (feet) Surf.Area (acres) Inc.Store (acre-feet) Cum.Store (acre-feet) 858.00 0.140 0.000 0.000 860.00 0.210 0.350 0.350 862.00 0.280 0.490 0.840 864.00 0.370 0.650 1.490 866.00 0.570 0.940 2.430 866.50 0.690 0.315 2.745 868.00 0.800 1.118 3.862 870.00 0.950 1.750 5.612 870.50 1.000 0.487 6.100 # Routing _ Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 866.50' 15.0" x 40.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 866.20' S= 0.00757 n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 2 Device 1 864.00' 15.0" x 25.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 866.50' S=-0.1000'P n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max=6.21 cfs @ 12.63 hrs HW=868.42' (Free Discharge) t1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 6.21 cfs @ 5.1 fps) t2=Culvert (Passes 6.21 cfs of 6.72 cfs potential flow) Pond 6P: Pond 6 Inflow Area = 12.490 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.74" for 10 year event Inflow = 16.31 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 1.809 of Outflow = 4.24 cfs @ 12.66 hrs, Volume= 1.801 af, Atten= 74%, Lag= 38.9 min Primary = 4.24 cfs @ 12.66 hrs, Volume= 1.801 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 920.00' Surf.Area= 0.330 ac Storage= 1.430 of Peak Elev= 921.13' @ 12.66 hrs Surf.Area= 0.375 ac Storage= 1.848 of (0.418 of above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 987.4 min calculated for 0.371 of (21 % of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 126.6 min ( 1,061.6 - 935.0 ) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 912.00' 2.382 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 912.00 0.080 0.000 0.000 914.00 0.120 0.200 0.200 916.00 0.170 0.290 0.490 918.00 0.220 0.390 0.880 920.00 0.330 0.550 1.430 922.00 0.410 0.740 2.170 922.50 0.440 0.212 2.382 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 920.09 18.0" x 20.V long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 919.80' S= 0.0100'P n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 PROPOSED 1-16-06 Prepared by {enter your company name HVdroCADrs) 7.00 s/n 000744 Cc) 198s-2003 At Type 11 24-hr 10 year Rainfall=4.20" Page 22 2 Device 1 918.00' 18.0" x 16.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 920.00' S=-0.1250 7 n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max=4.24 cfs @ 12.66 hrs HW=921.13' (Free Discharge) t 1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 4.24 cfs @ 4.1 fps) t2=Culvert (Passes 4.24 cfs of 5.17 cfs potential flow) Pond 7P: Pond 7 Inflow Area = 8.070 ac, Inflow Depth = 1,53" for 10 year event Inflow = 18.17 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 1.031 of Outflow = 3.31 cfs @ 12.33 hrs, Volume= 1.026 af, Atten= 82%, Lag= 17.4 min Primary = 3.31 cfs @ 12.33 hrs, Volume= 1.026 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 921.50' Surf.Area= 0.380 ac Storage= 1.385 of Peak Elev= 922.38' @ 12.37 hrs Surf.Area= 0.445 ac Storage= 1.776 of (0.391 of above start) Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated) Center -of -Mass det. time= (not calculated) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 914.00' 2.620 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below Elevation (feet) Surf.Area (acres) Inc.Store (acre-feet) Cum.Store (acre-feet) 914.00 0.080 0.000 0.000 916.00 0.120 0.200 0.200 918.00 0.180 0.300 0.500 920.00 0.240 0.420 0.920 921.50 0.380 0.465 1.385 922.00 0.400 0.195 1.580 924.00 0.640 1.040 2.620 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 921.50' 18.0" x 133.9 long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 920.00' S= 0.0113'f n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 2 Device 1 919.59 18.0" x 30.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 921.50' S=-0.0667 7 n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max=3.31 cfs @ 12.33 hrs HW=922.38' TW=921.08' (Dynamic Tailwater) t1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 3.31 cfs @ 4.4 fps) t2=Culvert (Passes 3.31 cfs of 3.42 cfs potential flow) PROPOSED 1-16-06 Prepared by tenter your company name here} HydroCAD® 7.00 s/n 000744 ©1986-2003 ADDlied M Type // 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Page 23 Time span=0.00-100.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 10001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Subcatchment 1 Runoff Area=15.420 ac Runoff Depth=2.81" Flow Length=160' Tc=23.3 min CN=70 Runoff=43.62 cfs 3.605 of Subcatchment 2S: Subcatchment 2 Runoff Area=23.900 ac Runoff Depth=3.09" Flow Length=1,005' Tc=11.2 min CN=73 Runoff=109.05 cfs 6.151 of Subcatchment 3S: Subcatchment 3 Runoff Area=0.970 ac Runoff Depth=3.18" Flow Length=70' Tc=8.6 min CN=74 Runoff=5.00 cfs 0.257 of Subcatchment 4S: Subcatchment 4 Runoff Area=0.340 ac Runoff Depth=3.99" Tc=2.0 min CN=82 Runoff=2.69 cfs 0.113 of Subcatchment SS: Subcatchment 6 Runoff Area=6.810 ac Runoff Depth=2.01" Flow Length=300' Tc=37.4 min CN=61 Runoff=9.52 cfs 1.138 of Subcatchment 6S: Subcatchment 6 Runoff Area=4.420 ac Runoff Depth=3.68" Flow Length=745' Tc=9.1 min CN=79 Runoff=25.58 cfs 1.355 of Subcatchment 7S: Subcatchment 7 Runoff Area=8.070 ac Runoff Depth=2.90" Flow Length=560' Tc=11.0 min CN=71 Runoff=34.79 cfs 1.949 of Subcatchment 8S: Subcatchment 8 Runoff Area=1.170 ac Runoff Depth=2.26" Flow Length=85' Tc=14.6 min CN=64 Runoff=3.42 cfs 0.221 of Pond 2P: Pond 2 Peak EIev=870.13' Storage=5.739 of Inflow=109.05 cfs 6.151 of Outflow=10.24 cfs 6.128 of Pond 6P: Pond 6 Peak EIev=922.01' Storage=2.175 of Inflow=29.75 cfs 3.299 of Outflow=8.76 cfs 3.292 of Pond 7P: Pond 7 Peak EIev=923.12' Storage=2.160 of Inflow=34.79 cfs 1.949 of Outflow=7.33 cfs 1.944 of Total Runoff Area = 61.100 ac Runoff Volume=14.790 of Average Runoff Depth = Z.90" PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type II 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 24 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 2/3/2006 Subcatchment 1 S: Subcatchment 1 Runoff = 43.62 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 3.605 af, Depth= 2.81" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 2.790 61 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG B 5.170 85 Wetland 0.980 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 0.420 98 Rooftops 6.060 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 15.420 70 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 23.3 160 0.0185 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" Subcatchment 2S: Subcatchment 2 Runoff = 109.05 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 6.151 af, Depth= 3.09" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.09' Area (ac) CN Description 3.210 98 Rooftops 2.180 98 Roadway 1.200 98 Driveway 0.320 98 Sidewalk 0.690 98 Open water 16.300 61 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG B 23.900 73 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 6.7 125 0.2600 0.3 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 1.0 125 0.0200 2.1 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 2.5 755 5.0 Direct Entrv. Pipe flow na 5 fps 11.2 1,005 Total PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type 1124-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 25 Subcatchment 3S: Subcatchment 3 Runoff = 5.00 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 0.257 af, Depth= 3.18" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.150 98 Rooftop 0.120 98 Roadway 0.040 98 Driveway 0.020 98 Sidewalk 0.640 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.970 74 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 7.6 70 0.0586 0.2 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 8.6 70 Total Subcatchment 4S: Subcatchment 4 Runoff = 2.69 cfs @ 11.92 hrs, Volume= 0.113 af, Depth= 3.99' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.140 98 Roadway 0.050 98 Sidewalk 0.150 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.340 82 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 5S: Subcatchment 5 Runoff = 9.52 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 1.138 af, Depth= 2.01" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" PROPOSED 1-16-06 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Area (ac) CN Description 0.150 98 Rooftops 0.680 55 Woods, Good, HSG B 5.980 61 >75% Grass cover. Good. HSG B 6.810 61 Weighted Average Type 1124-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Page 26 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 37.4 300 0.0200 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.79' Subcatchment 6S: Subcatchment 6 Runoff = 25.58 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume= 1.355 af, Depth= 3.68" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.150 98 Rooftop 1.270 98 Roadway 0.100 98 Driveway 0.350 98 Sidewalk 0.330 98 Open water 2.220 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 4.420 79 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 5.7 40 0.0400 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 2.3 705 5.0 Direct Entrv. Pioe flow Cal 5 fos 9.1 745 Total Subcatchment 7S: Subcatchment 7 Runoff = 34.79 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 1.949 af, Depth= 2.90" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.750 98 Rooftop 0.680 98 Roadway 0.300 98 Driveway 0.110 98 Sidewalk 0.380 98 Open water >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 8.070 71 Weighted Average PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type 11 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by (enter your company name here} Page 27 HydroCADS 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 2/3/2006 Tc (min) Length (feet) Slope (fUft) Velocity Capacity (fUsec) (cfs) Description 8.5 55 0.0270 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 1.3 160 0.0200 2.1 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 1.1 345 5.0 Direct Entrv. Pioe flow 0- 5 fus 11.0 560 Total Subcatchment 8S: Subcatchment 8 Runoff = 3.42 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.221 af, Depth= 2.26' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Area (ac) CN 0.090 98 1.080 61 1.170 64 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description 1.0 Direct Entry, Roof to yard 13.6 85 0.0200 0.1 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.70" 14.6 85 Total Pond 2P: Pond 2 Inflow Area = 23.900 ac, Inflow Depth = 3.09" for 100 year event Inflow = 109.05 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 6.151 of Outflow = 10.24 cfs @ 12.66 hrs, Volume= 6.128 af, Atten= 91 %, Lag= 37.5 min Primary = 10.24 cfs @ 12.66 hrs, Volume= 6.128 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 866.59 Surf.Area= 0.690 ac Storage= 2.745 of Peak Elev= 870.13' @ 12.66 hrs Surf.Area= 0.963 ac Storage= 5.739 of (2.994 of above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 515.0 min calculated for 3.383 of (55% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 210.9 min ( 1,043.7 - 832.8 ) # Invert Avail -Storage Storage Description 1 858.09 6.100 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below PROPOSED 1-16-06 Type 11 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 28 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 2/3/2006 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 858.00 0.140 0.000 0.000 860.00 0.210 0.350 0.350 862.00 0.280 0.490 0.840 864.00 0.370 0.650 1.490 866.00 0.570 0.940 2.430 866.50 0.690 0.315 2.745 868.00 0.800 1.118 3.862 870.00 0.950 1.750 5.612 870.50 1.000 0.487 6.100 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 866.59 15.0" x 40.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 866.20' S= 0.0075'P n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 2 Device 1 864.00' 15.0" x 25.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 866.59 S=-0.1000'P n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max=10.24 cfs @ 12.66 hrs HW=870.13 (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert ( Controls 10.24 cfs) t2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 10.24 cfs @ 8.3 fps) Pond 6P: Pond 6 Inflow Area = 12.490 ac, Inflow Depth = 3.1 T' for 100 year event Inflow = 29.75 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 3.299 of Outflow = 8.76 cfs @ 12.57 hrs, Volume= 3.292 af, Atten= 71 %, Lag= 33.5 min Primary = 8.76 cfs @ 12.57 hrs, Volume= 3.292 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs; dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 920.09 Surf.Area= 0.330 ac Storage= 1.430 of Peak Elev= 922.01' @ 12.57 hrs Surf.Area= 0.411 ac Storage= 2.175 of (0.745 of above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 425.8 min calculated for 1.861 of (56% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 96.4 min (997.9 - 901.4 ) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 912.00' 2.382 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (acres) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 912.00 0.080 0.000 0.000 914.00 0.120 0.200 0.200 916.00 0.170 0.290 0.490 918.00 0.220 0.390 0.880 920.00 0.330 0.550 1.430 922.00 0.410 0.740 2.170 922.50 0.440 0.212 2.382 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 920.09 18.0" x 20.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert= 919.89 S= 0.0100 'P n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 PROPOSED 1-16-06 Prepared by {enter your company name here) HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 000744 © 1986-2003 Applied Type 1124-hr 100 year Rainfall=6.00" Page 29 2 Device 1 918.00' 18.0" x 16.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 920.00' S=-0.1250 7 n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max=8.76 cfs @ 12.57 hrs HW=922.01' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 8.76 cfs @ 5.0 fps) L2=Culvert (Passes 8.76 cfs of 9.56 cfs potential flow) Pond 7P: Pond 7 Inflow Area = 8.070 ac, Inflow Depth = 2.90" for 100 year event Inflow = 34.79 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 1.949 of Outflow = 7.33 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 1.944 af, Atten= 79%, Lag= 12.5 min Primary = 7.33 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 1.944 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-100.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 921.50' Surf.Area= 0.380 ac Storage= 1.385 of Peak Elev= 923.12' @ 12.30 hrs Surf.Area= 0.534 ac Storage= 2.160 of (0.775 of above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 616.5 min calculated for 0.559 of (29% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 123.3 min (960.6 - 837.3 ) # Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description 1 914.00' 2.620 of Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below Elevation (feet) Surf.Area (acres) Inc.Store (acre-feet) Cum.Store (acre-feet) 914.00 0.080 0.000 0.000 916.00 0.120 0.200 0.200 918.00 0.180 0.300 0.500 920.00 0.240 0.420 0.920 921.50 0.380 0.465 1.385 922.00 0.400 0.195 1.580 924.00 0.640 1.040 2.620 # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Primary 921.50' 18.0" x 133.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 920.09 S= 0.0113 'f n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 2 Device 1 919.50' 18.0" x 30.0' long Culvert RCP, sq.cut end projecting, Ke= 0.500 Outlet Invert-- 921.59 S=-0.0667 7 n= 0.013 Cc= 0.900 Primary OutFlow Max=7.30 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=923.11' TW=921.90' (Dynamic Tailwater) t1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 7.30 cfs @ 4.8 fps) L2=Culvert (Passes 7.30 cfs of 7.87 cfs potential flow) "sG E S4%% Figure 3. Area Reviewed for Jurisdictional Wetlands Peterson Site Chanhassen, Minnesota Graham Environmental Services, Inc. GES Project No. 2005.133 DR +�o�� s�v ��rEf�,j 113106 d= 36P 6R--55- stoma = '50 AC'. A46 = `/ 5 q c . I �1rta.Y C MNDOT —� ' 6F Si7Es Graham Environmental Services, Inc. R0.8ox 189 Ellsworth, Wisconsin 54011 Memorandum RECEIVED TO: Lori Haak FROM: Scott Krych, Mike Graham —GES, Inc. CITY OF CHANHASSEN DATE: December 30, 2005 SUBJECT: Wetland Delineation for D.R. Horton Project - Chanhassen, Minnesota As you know, Graham Environmental Services, Inc. (GES) conducted a delineation of wetlands at the above -referenced site (Figure 1) on October 15, 2005. We have provided your office with a copy of our delineation report. Subsequently, the City has indicated that they believe that a depressional area not delineated by GES (Figure 2), but delineated previously by Pinnacle Engineering and surveyed by RLK in 2001 (Figure 3), is jurisdictional wetland. The depressional area in question will be called "Area 1" throughout the remainder of this memorandum. Area 1 is located on the northern half of the site southeast of Wetland A, as identified in the GES report. This area occupies a depression that is tiled, ditched, and was planted in crops every year since 1985 according to Farm Service Agency (FSA) slides. Sloping cropland borders this depression on all sides. Area 1 is served by an 8-inch drain tile that was actively removing water from the area during our delineation activities. The drain tile outlet is located at the southwestern portion of the site in an area that was delineated as Wetland F. To further investigate Area 1, GES reviewed all available aerial photographs for the site at the Carver County FSA offices on December 15, 2005. Photographs were available for the years 1985-1994 and 2000. We also reviewed an aerial photograph for 2003 from another source as part of our analysis.' Carver County FSA aerial photographs flown annually during the months of June, July, or August were evaluated to review the site for crop stress due to wetness, inclusion of non -cropped areas within cropland, different planting dates, surface water, areas drowned out by accumulated water, areas not planted due to moisture, etc.2 We've summarized our findings below. ' GES followed guidelines for reviewing FSA aerial photographs established in the August 1994 "State of Minnesota Interagency Cooperative Agreement for Implementation of the Federal Wetland Delineation Memorandum ofAgreement" (MOA) between the Natural Resource Conservation Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. ' GES followed the Off -Site Procedures Use of Rainfall Data with ASCS Slides to Determine Hydrology section of the MOA to evaluate the aerial photographs. These procedures require the use of rainfall spreadsheets from the NOAA weather station nearest to the site. This methodology is especially helpful in evaluating whether or not wetland hydrology exists in cropland areas that are planted or plowed. I . Phone: 715-647-5110 / 888-279-2070 Fax: 715-647-5209 / 888-279-2069 Ms. Lori Haak D.R. Horton Wetland Delineation December 30, 2005 Page 2 of 4 Hydrology Rainfall data is used to identify whether a specific area has received normal precipitation for an individual year or to establish climatic context for a specific region. Rainfall totals are a way to assess short-term fluctuations in ground and surface water levels that are important to note when evaluating wetland parameters. Areas that have received above normal rainfall may exhibit wetland hydrology when they would normally be dry. Conversely, areas that receive less than normal precipitation may not exhibit wetland hydrology when they normally would. The climatic context is a longer term evaluation of rainfall totals and may indicate growing season drought, pluvial, or normal periods and are also important to note when evaluating wetland parameters. Both rainfall and climactic data are important in areas that are farmed, tiled, ditched or that have numerous temporarily flooded wetlands. Both types of rainfall data are used when conducting on- and off -site evaluations on farmland. The Chaska recording station is the nearest station to the site providing rainfall data. The average annual precipitation for this area according to data from this station is 30.31 inches. Table 1 lists the average monthly rainfall for this area and the departure from normal during the four months prior to our site visit in October. Table 1 Month Average Monthly Rainfall (inches) 2005 Recorded Monthly Rainfall (inches) Departure from Normal (inches) June 4.16 7.26 +3.10 July 4.41 2.20 -2.21 August 4.34 4.73 +0.39 September 2.97 9.85 +6.88 October 2.14 5.01 1 +2.87 All data reported from Station 1465, Chaska, Minnesota. A plus (+) sign indicates above average amounts, a minus (-) sign indicates below average amounts. The climatic conditions for this area of the state were 125 percent of normal for the year through October, 110 percent of normal for the year through September, and 100 percent of normal for the year through August. For the southern one-half of Minnesota, the 2005 growing season ended on a very wet note. All-time high monthly rainfall records were set in some communities. For many locations in central and southern Minnesota, September precipitation totals topped seven inches. Rainfall in some locations exceeded ten inches for the month (Minnesota Climatology Working Group Home Page, October 2005). FSA aerial photographs show that there were secondary indicators of crop stress in Area 1 in the years 1993, 1994, and 2000. All three of these years were considered wetter than average or drier than average and would not be included in the analysis under MOA procedures. No signatures were present in years which fell within the Ms. Lori Haak D.R. Horton Wetland Delineation December 30, 2005 Page 3 of 4 normal precipitation range according to the MOA methodology. The MOA that prescribes how FSA reviews should be conducted requires a summary of the slide review and climate analysis. It also states 'That if the number of wet signatures in normal years is > 50 percent, the site will be considered to have wetland hydrology." Since signatures meeting MOA criteria are present in only three of the available 12 years (25 percent), the wetland hydrology threshold described in the MOA was not met in Area 1. Vegetation The plant community in Area 1 is dominated by soybeans (Glycine max), pinkweed (Polygonum pensylvanicum, FACW+), barnyard grass (Echinochloa crusgalli, FACW) and cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium, FAC) (see attached data sheet for more comprehensive information). Although the vegetation meets wetland criteria per the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987 Manual), it should be noted that these species are all annuals and reflect above -normal precipitation that was present in this area during critical germination periods during the 2005 growing season. Hydric Soils The soils in Area 1 exhibit up to 25 inches of accumulated sediments (eroded deposits) over the original soil surface. The accumulated sediments are dark brown (10YR 3/2) silt loams over dark gray/brown (10YR 4/2) silt loam. Soils exhibited bright (10YR 4/6) mottles to within six inches of the soil surface, but may be oxidation due to farming practices, crop residue, and water level fluctuation. No inundation or saturation was observed within 16 inches of the soil surface for the soil profiles examined within the depression. Conclusion Based on the conditions outlined above and within our delineation report, Area 1 is considered an "atypical situation" as defined in the 1987 Manual due to the effects of human activities. This area exhibited a plant community that is dominated by annual weed species some of which are considered hydrophytic and others as upland species. Due to the orientation of the plant species identified in this area, the plant community is considered FAC neutral or hydrophytic. Hamel soils are transitional, occurring in sloping areas where shallow depressions or drainages occur on the landscape. These soils were generally created in areas where surface sediments accumulate due to surface runoff. Hamel soils meet the technical definition of hydric soils when there are no hydrologic modifications. However, the hydrology that formed these soils historically has been altered by the presence of drain tiles and a shallow surface drain. Area 1 did not exhibit any primary indicators of hydrology or the required two secondary indicators (only FAC neutral plant community was present) to be called jurisdictional wetland. It is noteworthy that other similar basins on the site exhibited primary wetland indicators after significant rainfall events in October and as defined by the 1987 Manual. In summary, it is our opinion that Area 1 is not technically a jurisdictional wetland. Ms. Lori Haak D.R. Horton Wetland Delineation December 30, 2005 Page 4 of 4 Regardless, the developer has indicated a desire to acquiesce to calling a portion of Area 1 jurisdictional wetland and mitigating for the impacts if we can agree to its size. The most recent City correspondence included a hand -sketch of a suggested wetland boundary including approximately two acres. The Pinnacle Engineering delineation and RLK survey completed in 2001 identifies through technical methods a 0.26 acre wetland. Subsequently, this wetland boundary was included on the recently approved concept plan on the property. If the City concurs with the 0.26 acre boundary as the jurisdictional wetland area of Area 1, we are prepared to submit a Wetland Replacement Plan (WRP) on behalf of the developer, which includes 2:1 mitigation per the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) for the 0.26 acre area. The mitigation plan would include the possibility of on -site New Wetland Credit (NWC) as well as Public Value Credits on the site through the construction of storm water ponds. If NWC on the site proves infeasible, we would appreciate discussing with you the potential of restoring adequate wetland area within another area in the City. We are also in contact with Houston Engineering, who are working on a WRP for the wetland impact of the East- West Collector, regarding the possibility of a joint mitigation effort. We would appreciate an opportunity to discuss these issues with you after you have had a chance to review this memorandum. Thank you. Cc: Ron Mullenbach, D.R. Horton, Inc. — Minnesota Joel Cooper, James R. Hill, Inc. Randy Smith, James R. Hill, Inc. GE S4404 Graham Environmental Services, Inc. Figure 1. GES Delineation Peterson Site Chanhassen. Minnesota GES Project No. 2005.133 �G ES4444 Figure 2. Chanhassen Area 1 Boundaries Peterson Site Chanhassen, Minnesota Grabam Environmental Services, Inc. GES Projea No. 2005.133 GE S� Figure 3. Pinnacle Area 1 Boundaries Peterson Site Chanhassen, Minnesota Graham Environmental Services, Inc. GES Project No. 2005.133 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DELINEATION Project: 2005.133 Date: 10/14/2005 Applicant: Peterson Property Chanhassen _ County: Carver Delineator: SAK State: MN Wetland ID: Upland Transect ID: 1 VEGETATION Dominant Plant S cies: Wetland Stratum % Areal Coverage Indicator Status Common Name Scientific Name Barnyard grass Echinochloa crusgalli H 20 FACW Pinkweed Polygonum pensylvanicum H 40 FACW+ Cocklbur Xanthium shumarium H 30 FAC Rough amaranth Amaranthus retroflexus H 10 FACU+ Shepard's purse Capsella bursa-pastoris H <5 FAC- Field pennyoress Thlaspi arvense H <5 UPL Dominant Plant Species: Upland Stratum % Areal Coverage Indicator Status Common Name Scientific Name Beans Gycine max H 90 UPL OBL - Obligate. Occurs with an estimated 99% probability in wetlands; FACW - Facultative Wetland. Occurs with an estimated 67-99% probability in wetlands; FAC - Facultative. Occurs an estimated 34-66% probability in wetlands; UPL - Obligate Upland. Occurs with an estimated 99% probability in non -wetlands. NI - No Indicator. Insufficient information available to establish an indicator. Positive or negative signs indicate a tendency toward higher (+) or lower () frequency of occurrence within a category. Page 2 Netland ID: Upland 7TUKULUUT — I ransect 1, Ylt 1 t-tagNO. rvA Field Observations: Wetland H drology Indicators Primary Indicators: Secondary Indicators Depth of Surface Water: Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 NA (in.) Inundated Inches Saturated in Upper 12 Inches Water -Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Water Marks Local Soil Survey Data Pit: (Transect 1) 14 (in.) Drift Lines FX FAC-Neutral Test Sediment Deposits Other (Explain in Remarks) Depth to Saturated Soil: 14 (in.) Drainage Patterns in SOILS Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Mottle Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc. (inches) (Munsell Moist) Colors Abundance/ (Munsell Contrast Moist 0-25 COW 10YR 3/2 10YR 4/6 20% Silty loam Soil Profile: UPLAND (Pit 2, Transact 1) (25 feet from flagged boundary) 0-5 Cow 10YR 312 NA NA Silt loam 6-19 A 10YR 4/2 NA NA Silt loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic EpiDedon High Organic Content in Surface La er in Sand Soils Su�dic Odor Organic Streakingin Sand Soils A uic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ReducingConditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List X Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Is this sampling point within a X Yes No wetland? Yes X Nn Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Hydric Soils Present? X Yes No Cowardin Classification: Upland Remarks: Tiled basin that was dry after an 8" rainfall event. Photo Aspect: None Number of Flags: NA Isolated Non -Isolated. Describe connection: Ldst¢d December 30, 2005 Mr.. Iodd Gerhardt Via Email and US Mail City Manager . City of Chanhassen 770 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Peterson -Jacques Farm Land Property Dear Mr. Gerhardt: Thank you for our short conversation via telephone this last Iuesday regarding out project on the Peterson property. As you suggested; I've scheduled a meeting with City staff for Ihursday, January 5d' to discuss development of the property in more detail_ So that City staff may have opportunity to better prepare for our meeting, I've prepared this letter outlining some of our comments and questions, Park Dedication Our engineering consultants fiom James R. Hill and I have been meeting with City staff periodically since September to discuss our plans for the development of the Peterson property On Ihursday, December 22"d I received word from City staff indicating that there may be a "park issue". I immediately followed up with the Parks and Recreation Department staff. Parks and Recreation Department staff stated that the City's original plan was to acquire park land on the Degler property that would be sufficient in size to serve the park needs of the entire 2005 MUSA area I became aware for the first time in my conversation with Parks and Recreation Department staff that the City's agreement with the Degletsprior to_.the City Council's action on Bid Package #1 resulted in no park land dedication on the Degler property, I also became aware that the City was now looking for 4-12 acres of neighborhood pack land on either the Peterson property or the Dorsey property, with the Petersonn property being the Preferred location. At that time I expressed a concern that City staff had always indicated that cash in lieu of park land Idedication would be required on the Peterson property and that a land dedication was likely to make the terms of the_wdsting agreement with Peterson unworkable and that additional analysis would be needed by D_R. Horton. As a follow-up to the conversation, Mr. Hoffman called today and indicated that he was forwarding a concept showing 4.75 acres of park dedication on the Peterson property. Mt Iodd Gethm-dt December 30, 2005 Page 2 of 3 Although I have not yet seen the park concept, the City's cutrent position regarding park land dedication raises the following concerns and questions: ♦ What were the terms of the agreement between the City and the Deglers and what are the effects on other property owners with pending assessments? ♦ What was disclosed to other property owners with pending assessments prior to the City Council action on Bid Package M ♦ Who is responsible for the assessments on land dedicated to the City to satisfy park dedication requirements? ♦ Will the area within the Bluff Creek Overlay District be subject to park dedication requirements? ♦ Will the right-of-way dedicated for the City's public improvement project be subject to park dedication requirements. Collector Roads the City is requiring the private construction of an "on -site" collector street from the round- about on the Peterson property to Pioneer Trail, and also requiring dedication of the "off -site" collector street tight -of -way City staff has indicated that driveway access will not be permitted on the collector streets the similarities between the two roadway raise concerns related to how they are being handled related to the City's public improvement project: ♦ Why was the on -site collector street not included in the City's public improvement project with the costs assessed? ♦ Why is the right-of-way dedicated for the on -site and off -sits collector streets subject to assessments and park dedication requirements when they are not "developable"? If the acreage is dedicated to the City, does the City assume the assessment? ♦ Has the City compensated any property owners for right-of-way and/or ponding area acquisition in any form (cash, reduced assessments, etc.)? If so, should all other property owners be compensated at an equivalent rate? Wetlands City staff has indicated that they believe an area within the alignment of the future on -site collector, which was not identified as a wetland in our delineation report, is a jurisdictional wetland_ City staffs hand -drawn sketch of the proposed area includes approximately 2 acres of land. A delineation done in 2001 showed a jurisdictional wetland in this same area 0.26 acres in size the wetland impact is unavoidable due to the City's requirement for the on -site collector. Ihis raises several questions: ♦ We are willing to agree to a maximum of 0.26 acres of jmisdictional wetland provided the City is willing to allow the 2:1 mitigation through a combination of New Wetland Credits and. Public Value Credits provided within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Is the City willing to accept at minimum the wetland identified in the 2001 delineation? ♦ Is the acreage of this additional wetland exempt from the assessments? Mr Todd Gerhardt December 30, 2005 Page 3 of 3 Ponding City staff has indicated that ponding within the Bluff Creek Overlay District will require a variance fiom City Code, which they will neither support nor _,oppose: If the pond cannot be placed within the Bluff Creek Overlay District, the pond must be placed on top of the bluff, which our engineer has identified as a potential long-term erosion issue. ♦ Why is a variance required for ponding in the Bluff Creek Overlay District when this type of activity is not typically prohibited adjacent to a DNR-designated waterway? ♦ If the non -wetland and non-floodplain areas within the Bluff Creek Overlay District cannot be used for any activity, including ponding, why is this acreage assessed as "developable" acreage under the public improvement project? ♦ Has the City constructed a trail of any other improvement within the Bluff Creek Overlay District? We look forward to meeting with City staff to discuss these issues_ Should you have any questions at any time, please feel free to contact me at 952-985-7827. Ihank you. Sincerely, Ron Mullenbach Project Manager Cc: Sever Peterson (via email only) John Chadwick (via email only) Paul Bilotta (via email only) Kate Aanenson, City of Chanhassen (via email only) Todd Hoffman, City of Chanhassen (via email only) Paul Oehme, City of Chanhassen (via email only) Stephen Paul, President, DHI—Minnesota (via email only) Robert Erickson, Vice -President, DIII-Minnesota (via email only) Richard Palmitet, Land Acquisition Manager, DII—Minnesota (via email only) John Kuehn, Leonard, Street & Dienard (via email only) Joel Cooper, James R. Hill (via email only) 0 4, A�G ES Figure 3. Area Reviewed for Jurisdictional Wetlands Peterson Site Chanhassen, Minnesota Graham Environmental Services, Inc. GES Project No. 2005.133 �G ES Figure 3. Area Reviewed for Jurisdictional Wetlands Peterson Site Chanhassen, Minnesota Graham Environmental Services, Inc. GES Project No. 2005.133 400 ti • ' 4 •. r 4 ♦� I ' ' 1• Ego&&,. 0 400 800 1200 Feet �! zoo3 � � v.. u `.y zoo z. 5 yc]� w A*p A 1 1. L `ice i tz k�L Alawa< a, 1 � • 1' 1 C k S { 400 0 400 800�� 11 m ffrf T.- 0 400 rIy 800 1200 Feet N � A We will be at our new Location December 12, 2005 New Address and Phone Number 51095 Westland Drive Spring Valley, WI 54767 Phone:715-778-5730 Fax:715-778-5867 E-mails will remain the same www.grahamenvironmental.com We Are Moving (i �% Grabam Environmental Services, Inc. We have constructed a new office facility to accommodate our growth and maintain our commitment to providing the highest qual- ity environmental consulting services to our clients. * * Note - Use Immediately* * Scott Krych's Contact Information Phone:952-758-9721 Fax:952-758-9713 E-Mail: skrych@grahamenvironmental.com Page 1 of 1 Haak, Lori From: Randy Smith [rsmith@jrhinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 4:58 PM To: Haak, Lori Cc: Morris, Alyson; Aanenson, Kate; 'Ron A Mullenbach' Lori Here are two concept plan exhibits that we would like city staff to review. Concept Plan Exhibit 1 will demonstrate where we would like to propose our pond locations, per our earlier discussions about the erosion problems that would occur. After further review, we could possibly size the pond to account for a portion of the drainage from Street E (city project) and therefore save some storm sewer cost for the city project. Between the erosion problems that would occur from the pond outlet to the existing bluff creek and sizing the pond to compensate for the additional off -site drainage, we feel this proposed pond location would work best. I have forwarded you the two different concepts for your review per your request and please let me know if you have any comments or concerns at your earliest convenience. We would like to start working on the preliminary plat exhibits in the near future, so it we would greatly appreciate your comments through a letter or email at your earliest convenience. Thank you Randy Smith Project Manager 2500 West Cry. Road 42 Suite 2500 Bumsville, MN 55367 Office (952) B90-6044 Cell (612) 269-9657 rstr th®irhinc.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: INFORMATION IN THIS MESSAGE, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE AND FOR THE PURPOSES INDICATED. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, or employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete all copies of the original message. Thank You: James R. Hill Inc. 12/1/2005 1 -2 I JO L 133H5 inna + 31,j 3N11 11VZa13s r 9... e=!SiiimirsiE!Q ON 103roNd IM N1 11Rn DNI&A�, q,6,9 -x —I�3dDMLZ (0039) '3Nn . . . 311A OVO 2c a xvia3l,0 A33ZP ij + + + + + + Jill t + + + + e,.W, IM 1P + + + + SNOGA3m + + fly + WWII + I'dik 3LVO + SSN + + + L AG WvNa + wt, q + + + + TnI + , rw� 'Its flk�lv + + + + + + + F+ + + is 0OW38 + + I Z -,o . . . . . . INNI N33NOld 01 f 3Nn 0056 A + 2 + 4 + + 0 �,�,,SS303V (13SOdOMd LIP FA + + + z aNV113A a2LV3Nrl3O+ N + + + t.j + . . . . + A �Iz .... + + 80 me+ Z u +sVAd o .. + 9 + + + 1z 6z 16 V + + + /+ : X + + + em + + + + + mace . . . . . . . . .... + + + + + + + + + + + + /++ ++ + dVYV ADNIOLA CD iNdi Aid, )tV1d3A0 -A3J N WI UN • W4I OM 00[ W, 0 ADM3 00 a� n o x o y 00 � z S o "a a z `3 e—Z�a=z z >: 1 V3 m� VO �z z y tij N o .4 =a AV 1a-/\V ++ I-1 F/ ,t j a } ll + + I}}++� L)rlA \+1+ +\ I / • + } + 1 1 iL 4 + /SECONDARY BUFF +OVERLAY DISTRICT I } J } + r :. J / /, PRIMAR LUFF (r OVERLAY DISTRICT LI P R CITY OF CHAN BLU ( C OVERLAY_DIS RIC (VIOW ARE 160�RAfRAYY611LOFF, CR K_ _ _ DISTRICT LINE T'YP ? PER CITY OF (CH', \\, r 8 9 6 4 G 7 ' 3 / �1 r 0 � 2 - 2 /I BLUFF%-EIK OVERLAY TRICT k 7 ------------- p� >` I / _ 4 , > IV 4, c, CY� O - � IN SITE Lli LLJ Li N cc $ O BGTin4coa 8C5 ^O_ WUNITY MAP U 0- PI 1 I 1 I •�� IML I / \ I i , 1 \ IASSEN 24 G = 3 7 8 9, \\r I `` `F�,1�11 1.11111�II-✓ J 13 7n I�'yb�FF1 r` v 2\ 21 28 T 9O4 0 5 23 20 15 1 29 '1cll, R 4 �. 0 3 24 19 '` 16 3Q 11 25 18 17 31 tsflNo it i 0 13 1211' \ V`ti\N 4,1-11 4 Fr„ 4 —1- a4 Af„` -3 *� 4— �/ SONb�R I COVE L $. 10 / + LIN PtR N* SITE DATA / LOr FAMILY "RLM' ZCNMG 99 LOTS r -4NQE DEMSW i ONEDEVELUNITS BB µNDIrs I.S. ou./ACPE •JWI A` all I i\MCLUgNG SECONDARY BLUFF CREE/K \ OVERLAY DISTRICT AREA 45.32 ACRES \ GRO55 LAND APEX. 80 ACRE III 17a ACRES Di PRIMARY BLUFT CREEK Er Y OVERLAY DISTRICT AREA O `V • (5.25*TAMS OF SECONDARY BLUFF CREEK E \ OV£TdAY (INCLINES I) 3O2 ACRES I, MNDOT ROW BEING TAKEN) X. �y t w n (INCLINE05Y S a0ACRES OF DEVELMME LAND) C4 Q� x R W s `A `\ E EIMAirFY lnYAloOtt MTH CONCEPT 125p) S.F. o • \ ` • s\ AVERAGE LOT AREA e,_ \%\ MIN +OT AREA 9.000 SF. aAII�LOT MOTH AT SETBAIX BS FEET S d V $_ •• \\ \\ ` MIN LOT DEPTH (WTH W HOUSE PAD) 110 MT � W `\ `V MIN LOT MOTH AT SETT A FOR CORWE N LOT IDD FEET 50 iEET M Tkji \ MIN. LOT FRONTAGE FRONT YARD SETBACK 25 fEET F !n G. Z \`•1 •� `\ REAR TARO 25 FEET W O' L ` \ E AM V SNE TAFO SETBAIX 5 FEET X V Z O oW U: U LESS 'RA„ + '� J KAYbISTRICT LIE (TYP.) .R..I +OF �HA ASSEN + +/ + + YB6ISTRICT E I µE NN RE�_ (TYP.) 0 Im 2GO m CHANH S EN—i� a 1.0 - IGo I1 �k looses l 4e dA,s �' Cr. A A ail (Hwy *L� - Pioneerlta%\ / PRI�JIv ARY UFF-CiREEK / OVERLAY DISTRICT LINE (TYP.) / P R CITY OF CHANHASSEN I, foe\„ BLUE C 0 V R LA / Y DIS RICE �TIGATIOIV� _ A\v vvv�`vv vv�awiw POND �S CONDARY BLUFF CRC K OVERLAY D I STRIfrT LINE TYP PER CITY OF CHANT• \� ,\ g \,\\\\\`\\\� a •. \\\\\\\\\v\ 0r PrbnOry BG1pD^ --- sr ^1 S eras :r ! jj x N \ zo ewao o ar Q cox - Ci I ,a. s .r t fr: v >f es «r ~ .--. . . �' i 1 1� 1 IC LJ IuLJ =3a91 L-�.: L.I I l.9 I I I SEC. 27 SEC. 26 T. 116, R. 23 VICINITY MAP NO SCALE SITE DATA LOT —SINGLE FAMILY "RLM" ZONING 88 LOTS DENSITY C DWELLING UNITS 88 UNITS ) 1.94 D.U./ACRE (GROSS —DEVELOPABLE LAND AREA INCLUDING SECONDARY BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT AREA 45.3t ACRES GROSS LAND AREA: 80 ACRE (INCLUDES 17.40f ACRES OF PRIMARY BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT AREA (INCLUDES 5.25t ACRES OF SECONDARY BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT (INCLUDES 17.30t ACRES OF MNDOT ROW BEING TAKEN) (INCLUDES 40.05t ACRES OF DEVELOPABLE LAND) SINGLE FAMILY LOT REQUIREMENT & DATA "RLM' RESIDENTIAL LOW AND MEDIUM DENSITY AVERAGE LOT AREA WITH CONCEPT 12,500 S.F. MIN. LOT AREA 9,000 S.F. MIN. LOT WIDTH AT SETBACK 85 FEET MIN. LOT DEPTH (WITH 60' HOUSE PAD) 110 FEET MIN. LOT WIDTH AT SETBACK FOR CORNER LOT 100 FEET MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 50 FEET FRONT YARD SETBACK 25 FEET REAR YARD SETBACK � 25 FEET SIDE YARD SETBACK 5 FEET REEK E (TYP . ) ASSEN SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 300 0 - Inmmomw 1 inch = 100 feet N � N o m� _� O � mlxi Cif p n LLJ Z LIJ N F Cl) w 3 wZ W O O N O W o El Z o ccW$aJ Ict 0 a w z 0/)w 1(Ld z pa i--� Z ; ^ Oa w J P 0 r , W _J Ld Ld aW Zz z ,Y J z z� z � Vo O W w V) W z w �= _ z a zCY V) �`' w LDo l-4 U z z aLd " �j C) W m W co (b ACA DRAWN BY RSS DATE 11 /15/05 REVISIONS CAD FILE 21996CPEXH PROJECT NO. 21996 FILE NO. DRAWER SHEET 1 OF 1 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1133 Fax: (952) 227-1110 Few To: Eric Johnson From: Jill Sinclair Fax: 933-1153 Date: July 13, 2005 Phone: Pages: 3 Re: CC: ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle -Comments Eric, I made the points large and white on the photo without contours so that you can see them easily, hopefully. On the contoured photo, the data points are small and dark. Jill Sinclair 952-227-1133 pinned( 1 Cad` i l ! � � t � . .j ' f •r y •. 1. ! �. Zt s s � • 4 Ail. y y A.' • �+ `a i 2�r�rail (Hwywy Pioneer Cad l Q r ,. 1 a • 1 \ r 9 r � ' I 1 \ 1 I j;lI— r& m&fpa 10 liet doesA,� MaAt FAV&h SOASe . CH tc�tllr I�e(c� l:lw ids o a I:�-jL�`.x1 JUL-18-2005 11:01 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.01i33 July 18, 2005 SENT VIA FAX Pages 3 3 To: Kate Annenson Q ,' Z— 573 7- 17 3 7 Wetland Delineation Report Peterson Bluff John E. Chadwick 612-965-9730 JUL-18-2005 11:01 CONSULTING MGMT CONST _ y _ JUL'-98-2003 0Fi I SS CUNSUL I I NU MUM I LU b I 76350913154 P.02i33 b 11J�I`Jyl �9 I'. k7�/JJ NWETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION For: Peterson Property El/2 NEl/4 Section 27& SW1/4, NW 1/4 Section 26, T116N, R23W Chanhassen, MN Prepared for: Sever Peterson 15900 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. 11000 91" Avenue Notch Maple Grove, MN 5 53 69 ISOO Fint Avenue NE Rochester, MN 55906 JUL-18-2005 11:01 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.03/33 WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION FOR: PETERSON PROPERTY E'/2 NE 1/4 SECTION 27 & SW 1/4 NW V/+ SECTION 26, T116N, R23W CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR -- SEVER PETERSON 1590D FLYING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN PREPARED BY: PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. 11000 93RD AVENUE NORTH MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 PINNACLE PROJECT NUMBER: MNMI65.00 Prepared By: /Cd?7'- &4,, Matt Bartus Environmental Scientist SFT'TEMBER 13, 20D1 Reviewed By: I Mike Hultgren Group Manager Environmental Engineering JUL-18-2005 11:01 CONSULTING MGMT CON5T 7635099154 P.04/3Z -~---' - - Table v��f Contents 1J0 IRTRODUCTION —~"^~-~^^°°~°.~^~~~~~^~^~^~^~~°~—°°°°~~^~'—^~'°^~°°-~ %l Introduction ....................................................... � �'� �c�r��.~.°.~.°~.-~.°.,,°.~.°~~^~~^'`"~^`~~�~~-�~^�~~`—~�~~~~^^^~'---^~ I 2�� Q�K��0��0.—"°°°.°..°.,..~°,°.~°~^~^~~~°^~~~—~~~ 1 21 site Location aK��se..°,,^.^..°,°"-^^°,'°"~^`°~^~~-~`~-^-~°,^~^^--~^^--~~^°^^ � 3.2 ��$.~~..^^,,~��~~^°~�—~~°`°°°^°~°~�°^~°^°°~~—~~`~^~—.~°~~^.~. 2 Surveys ^ � 2-2-1 So�Survey ..~,^,~=°,~,^°,.,~~,_,,.~_,_,~,,,^,,,~,,`,,,°~^,,°,,,^,°°,,,, 2.2.2��SCS ~~~^^~..."°°°~~.~^�"°.°~"~°".~.~._~^~,^~,.~+- o"^^ " 2�,3��VVI��ax��",.~°°"°.^"°^~.".°_~°""—~~�~^~~^^^~`^~1~~~1^°^~~~~'~~^~ -�� 4 PV\Ih�ape.~.°°,.^~~.~..,~"°^°°,.~,,,,~_,,^°°,,,,.�'°`~__,`~.,,~,~~~ � � 3J� WETLAND AT%K��['`.^�^.^"°=^°°~.,.~~°,~-~,.,,~~"^,~-~^°~^^~^^ � 3][ Methodology ..................................... ~~~.~~-..-.°......~'°.°.°~~~^°,~~..°""—.^~ 3�� 0�� ^~..-.~^°~°°°°°"'`~°"""°~^""~"~^-~~~~~~~~^~'~~~~� � 4]0 K��K�L��SI��°°°^°.,°°°^"°^^°,°,~~.°^~^°~^~°^.~^~~~^~^.-^°~—`^`~~~^~~~'^^~~~. � � 6�� °,�.°�~,.~.~�°°°°..�°�.°°��-�.°�,,�^^�^.��^°��°~~°°..�.°�~��.` JUL-18-2005 11:02 J UL-I�H-Lhk73 17t] � Sq CONSULTING MGMT CONST t-LMUL 1 1 NU I'LT1I WNn I 7635099154 P.05i33 OIGOGJJIJY r. v.�i �.n FIGURES FIGURE 1: Site Location Map FIGURE 2: Carver County Soil Survey Map FIGURE 3: National Wetland Inventory Map FIGURE C protected Wetland Inventory Map FIGURE 5: Wetland Locations APPENDIX A: Data Forts APPENDICES PINNACLE FNGQQAEMG, INC. WETLAND DELINEATION .. J JUL-12-2005 11:02 JIA-�i—LNI'JS N[7�34 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.06i33 UUNV ULI I 1'6'II LUIVDI oic✓c,»aw I .v.r _,� 1.1 introduction 1.0 INTRODUCTION Mr. Sever Peterson, the current land owner and Mr. Brian Sullivan of RLK-Kuusisto retained Pinnacle Engineering, Lnc. (Pinnacle) to perform a wetland delineation on portions of the 120-acre Peterson property located north of Pioneer Trail within the E 1/2 NE 1/4 of Section 27 and SW V• NW V. Section 26, T116N, R23W in Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota (Site) (Figure 1). 1.2 Scope Pinnacle conducted the Wetland Determination and Delineation in accordance with the criteria established in the 1987 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland delineation manual, updated in 1997, and the U. R Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Circular 39. The work included the following items: • An initial site reconnaissance. • Review of the Site utilizing County Soil Surveys, USGS topographic naps, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory (PWl) maps, and National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Maps. Review of Farm Service Agency (PSA) aerial slides, Assessment and delineation of the potential wetlands identified in the background review. • Preparation and submittal of this report suurunarizing the findings of our work. 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2.1 Site Location and Use The Site is located north of Pioneer Trail, east of Audubon Road in Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota within the NE V, of Section 27, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, as reviewed on the Shakopee, Minnesota quadrangle map (Figure 1). The Site consists of approximately 120 acres of undulating, undeveloped agricultural land, which is comprised of tillable farmland, tree rows, fallow land, wetlands and portions of Bluff Creek. The Site is in an agricultural area of Chanhassen that is currently experiencing substantial development. This delineation concentrated on the western and southern portions of the Site and any wooded areas and the Bluff Creek corridor and its associated wetlands were not investigated as part of this delineation. PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. WETLAND DELINEATION JUL-18-2005 11:02 JUL-08-2003 08:35 CONSULTING MGMT CONST LUNSULI 1NJ MUM WNSI 7635099154 P.07i33 WLCN"�I� r.vrljJ 2.2 Surveys and Maps Pinnacle conducted a review of the Carver County Soil Survey, topographic, PWi and NM maps, and FSA aerial slides for the vicinity of the Site. The following sections summarize the information available at the time of this review. 2,2.1 Soil Survey The Carver County Soil Survey was reviewed for soils information pertaining to the Site. The Soil Survey indicated that the soils at the Site consist of Hamel loam, Lester - Kilkenny loams, (6-25% slopes, eroded), Houghton-Muskego soils, Terril loam, and Glencoe clay loam. Of the mapped soil types, the Hamel loam, Houghton-Muskego soils, and Glencoe clay loam were listed on the hydric soils lists. A copy of the Carver County soil survey is included as Figure 2. 222 USGS Topographic Maps The topography of the Site is undulating with a range in elevation from approxirnately 870 to 950 feet above mean sea level (MSL) as reviewed on the Shakopee, Minnesota Quadrangle map. Based on contour intervals on the quadrangle map, surficial drainage is predominately to the northeast, toward the Bluff Creek stream channel. 2.2.3 NWI Maps The Shakopee, Minnesota NWI map depicted two wetland basins and a riverine system (Bluff Creek) on the Site. The mapped wetland basins were depicted as Palustrine, Emergent, Seasonally Flooded, partially drained/ditched (PEMCd) basins and were located along the western boundary and in the northern portion adjacent to the stream channel. The stream channel was mapped as a Riverine, Intermittent, Streambed (R45B). A copy of the NWT map is included as Figure 3, 2-Z4 PWI Maps The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has designated Protected waters in Minnesota which are identified on PWI maps. The PWI map for Carver County, Minnesota indicated that Bluff Creek on the north side of the Site is mapped as part of protected water 209W (Figure 4). PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. WETLAND DELINEATION 2 JUL-18-2005 11:03 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.08i33 2.2.5 Farm Service Agency slide review Aerial slides of the Site and surrounding area for the years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000 were reviewed by Pinnacle at the Carver County FSA on August 27, 2001. The reviewed slides were very similar from year to year and depicted the majority of the Site to be in agricultural production. Bluff Creek and a possible wetland area associated with the creek were apparent in the northeast portion of the Site. Two isolated basins were also apparent in all of the reviewed slides. One basin was located along the western property boundary, while the outer basin was located in the central portion of the Site, northwest of the existing farmhouse. The potential wetlands identified during the slide review were consistent with our field observations and their boundaries were flagged and surveyed. No other potential wetlands were identified during the aerial slide review. 3,0 WETLAND DETERMINATION 3.2 Methodology The wetland determinations were made utilizing the techniques of the Routine Method, as suggested in the 1987 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, updated February 25, 1997, The conclusions derived in this report are consistent with and respect the wetland criteria recorded in the manual- Determination of hydric soils, site hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation were de according to the o were selectedprocedures and guidelines described in the manual. sampling O be representative of wetland, upland and border areas. Mr. Matt Bartus of Pinnacle conducted an assessment of the wetlands at the Site on August 17, 2001. The assessment included probing the soils to observe the color and moisture content, as well as other available hydric soil indicators. The characteristics noted for each sampling location are documented in the wetland determination data forms, which are included as Appendix A. Survey markers were placed along the approximate edge of the wetlands. A wetland determination was conducted for all potential wetland areas within the project corridor. Of the two potential wetlands identified in the background review, both wetlands were determined to meet all three wetland criteria and their boundaries were flagged and surveyed. The general wetland descriptions are discussed below. Wetland locations are shown in Figure 5. pllvNACLE ENGINEERING. INC. V&-rLAND DELINEATION 3 1S-�OUiS 11 U3 UNSULTWG 11GMT COHST 7635099154 P.09i33 3.2 Wetland Descriptions Wetland A Wetland A was classified as a Circular 39, Type 2, wet meadow or a Palustrine, Emergent, Seasonally Flooded, partially drained (PEMCd) wetland under the Cowardin classification system. Wetland A is a small, isolated, depressional basin located along the western boundary of the Site. The vegetation within Wetland A consisted of a monotypic stand of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) FACW+, while the adjacent uplands were vegetated by box elder (Ater negundo) FACW- to the west and by foxtail and pioneer weed species in the fallow area to the east that was recently plowed under, making plant identification impractical. The loam soils within Wetland A had a matrix color of 10 YR 3/2 in the A -horizon underlain by a B-horizon with a matrix color of 10 YR 2/1. The soil was distinctly mottled to the surface by mottles with a matrix color cf 10YR 4/6. This area was mapped in the Carver County Soil Survey as Hamel loam, which is classified as a hydric soil. This area was also apparent on the Shakopee, NV NWI map as a Palustrine, Emergent, Seasonally Flooded, partially drained (PEMCd) wetland. These observations were consistent with our field observations. This basin was not inundated at the time of the delineation; however, the soils were saturated within the upper 12 inches. Wetland B Wetland B was classified as a Circular 39, Type 1, seasonally flooded basin or a Palustrine, Emergent, Temporarily Flooded (PEMA) wetland under the Cowardin classification system. Wetland B is a depressional area located northwest of the farmhouse in the unfarmed fallow area of the Site. This area was not depicted on the Shakopee, MN NWI map; however, it was mapped in the Carver County Soil Survey as Hamel loam (hydric) and was apparent on all of the reviewed FSA aerial slides. The vegetation within this basin was comprised of a monotypic stand of smartweed (polygonum sp) NI, while the adjacent upland vegetation consisted of opportunistic weed species that were recently plowed under, making identification difficult. The soil profile within the upper 12 inches of Weiland B was disturbed due to agricultural activities- Our field observation revealed loam soils comprised of an A horizon with a matrix color of 10 YR 2/1 underlain by a B horizon comprised of 10 YR 2/2 with 10 Y Z 4/6 mottles being prominent and common to within a few inches of the surface. 4.0 CONCLUSION Pinnacle has performed a Wetland Determination and Delineation of a portion of the Peterson property located north of Pioneer Trail, east of Audubon Road within the NE PWNACLE ENGINEERING, 4 WETLAND DELINEATION JUL-18-2005 M. w c 11:04 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.10i33 V �L✓V I.i,✓-I aV ✓✓ Vi of Section 27, T116N, R23W in Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota. The delineation was conducted in accordance with the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, updated February 25,1997. Two wetland areas in the investigated area were determined to have met the wetland criteria of hydric soils, hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation. The estimated wetland boundaries were flagged, surveyed and verified by Ms. Lori Haak of the City of Chanhassen. It should be noted that the Bluff Creek corridor and its associated wetlands in the northeast portion of the Site were not delineated because they were beyond the scope of work for this project. 5.0 STANDARD OF CARE Frivironmental services performed by Pirtnacle for the project have been conducted in a manner consistent with the degree of we and technical skill appropriately exercised by environmental professionals currently practicing in this area under similar budget and time constraints. Recommendations or opinions contained in this report represent our professional judgment and are generally based upon available information and currently accepted practices for environmental professionals. Other than this, no other warranty is implied nor is it expressed, 6.0 REFERENCES USGS, 1958, Revised 1993 Shakopee, Minnesota Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic), U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. National Wetlands Inventory Map. 1991 Shakopee, Minnesota Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic), U. S, Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Eggers, Steve D. and Reed, Donald M., Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wiscensin,1997, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. Lyon, John Grimson, Practical Handbook for Wetland Identification and Delineation, 1993, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, U. 5. Arrny Carps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,1987, updated February 25,1997, Washington, D. C. PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. ;KMAND DELINEATION JUL-18-2005 11:04 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.11/33 u iRW++iJ1 I .ii JJ JUL-18-2005 11:04 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.12i33 J UL-wJ W.0-40 luY�uLl �iw 1'ul'1� l.u`IJI DICJYJ77a�4 r. 1L/JJ FIGS 1 SITE LOCATION MAP WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION Peterson PtopertY Chsni wma , MN JUL-18-2005 11:04 jtJ -Xlq-cmqq•.]f CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.13/33 JUL-18-2005 11:05 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.14i33 FIG RE 2 CARVER COUNTY SOIL SURVEY MAP WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION Peterson Property Chanhassen, MN JUL-18-2005 11:05 J 1.IL-W—GUW tJp•JO CONSULTING MGMT CONST a.lA'I�U41IM1.f 1'0.7'11 LUI'1�1 7635099154 P.15i33 oaeonrsa� r.a�ss . .....r.,... Y.e t.� • J•: a, I'.:. , ate., ..Ya ..�.. .. , .•r .. 'v.ha.•w'! A . id.'.,:'��.R- ..,-n�iy:,•1yr.-�f.iit. "t,',,.,; �,,,., �y4."� �:. Figure 2. MEngineering Pinnacle Carver County Soil Survey Peterson Property 1600 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, Minnesota 11000 Ic rd Avenue N Inc. I I000 93rd Avenue North Doer. Plapared By: Map1c Grove, MN 55369 SeDtember 10, 2001 M. Bartus Phone:(763) 315.4501 Fax (763) 315.4507 Scalr. Ruvicwed By! 1 25,000 1 M. HWtgran JUL-18-2005 11:06 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.16i33 1. 11 1 oldowo oA. r.lcl. j FIGURE 3 NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAP WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION Peterson Property Chanhassen, MN JUL-18-2005 11:07 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.17i33 01c�wva� 1.1110, UPinnacle Engineering Pinnacle QnginecrinC, Inc. 11000 93rd Avenue North Maple Orave, MN 55369 Mne:(7763)315.4501 Fax: (763)313.4507 Figure 3. Shakopee, MN NWI Map Peterson Property 1600 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, Minnesota Due: t towed By: "plember % 2001 M. Banus a Sala: Reviewed By: 1:26,000 M. NuBgren JUL-18-2005 11:07 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.18i33 v_ _ +u�-w-cow u0• Mu �wVou� i �i•ti 1'All'I I l.U1V01 b1 G�19`J7179 Y. 1tY3.1 FIGURE 4 PROTECTED WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION Peterson Property Chanhassen, MN JLL-18-2005 11:07 JIiL—tld�Gtltl3 tltl:9tl Jua •u r•..r ..�. ��r CONSULTING MGMT CONST I.UK:,ULI IN.i MUMT CLINSI 7635099154 P.19i33 6125B991S4 P.19i33 Figure 4. Pinnacle Carver County PWI Peterson Property Engineering 1600 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, Minnesota Pinnaalc Engineering, Inc. Dale; Prepve4 By: 11000 93rd Avooue North m4ple Grove, MN S5369 September 10, 2001 M. Banat Phone: (763) 315.4501 Pu (763) 315-4507 a Seale: Reviewed By: No Scale M. Mullgron JUL-18-2005 11:08 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.20i33 +.+� w cvw ..•-�c �Wll�I I1V V"III LWlzI oilewtJ`11J9 Y. LLY33 FIGURE 5 WETLAND LOCATIONS MAP WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION Peterson Properly Chanhassen, MN JUL-18-2005 11:08 �VL-CG-CGG� GO.4C CONSULTING MGMT CONST LUN:DL& I I NU MA I WM, I a N ! M C 114 1 1 � 1 0♦ 1 1 I t a 1 �--'±t1Elli.�•i• �'�� i ,I 7635099154 P.21i33 6125099154 P.21i33 I I o I o E A py n �w P. �. P D .Q lD n y 1�+1 a� a1" 0 �!a e� JUL-18-2005 11:09 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.22i33 JUL-18-2005 11:09 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.23i33 APPENDIX A DATA FORMS WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION Peterson Property Chanhassen, MN JUL-18-2005 11:09 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.24/33 oac�o�tn r.941Oj DATA FORM ROLTINE w)?71.A D T - N T O (19117 C E W LzLdS Delineation M ue Do ormal Circumstances Exist on Me, I'm: 1s the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Is the area a potential Problem Areal iff needed, explain on reverse.) _ HYDROLOGY QO(_Reootded Dam (Describe in Remarks). Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge XX Amel Photographs Other No Recorded Data Available Field Observations Depth of Surface Water! 0 (in.) Depth to Free Walax in Pit. in.) Deptb to Saturated Soil. >1B (in•) Wetland bydrologyladitalors: Primary 1udieators: Inuotimed `Saturated in Upper 121nches _Water Marks _Drift Linos Seditsect Aapoaits _Drainage Pattems in Wetlands Secoadoryladicetora (2 or more rWuirred : oxld=d Row Chumets is Upper Water-Staitsed Lnvas —Local Soll Survey Dau FAC-Neutral Test (Explain in JUL-18-2005 11:09 CONSULTING MGMT CONST '..V Maw -I I, iu 1'awll V1.11YJ1 7635099154 P.25i33 C1G,137`J1Dr r. Gi33 SOILS Transcm ID: A•Unlend Plot lD: Tyne 2_, M 0( Flags__ Mop Unit Name: Lester -Kilkenny Loamy (Series and phase), 6.12% slopes, eroded OrainaSe Class: Well Drained ield observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Map7 e Y No Profile Deseriatiow Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inchesMorita (Mansell oist) (Mansell M01l1 Abundaa«/Contrast StnscNre, etc 0-4 A 10 YR 42 Nano loII" - 4+ S IOYR 312 loa— Hydric Soil Indicators. Histosol Histie Epipcdon Concretions High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils Sutfsdic Odor Organic Scrcaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regimo Listed on Local Hydric Sails List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydrie Soils List 6leyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain: in Remarks) Remarks: _.. No hydric sail indicators WETLAND DETERMINATION Vegetation Resent? Vas rology present? Yes present? Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Ytsn (Circle) JUL—_18—_2005 11:09 JaA W cWJ CIO'YJ CONSULTING MGMT COJST ltAl I A NU 1'"'11 LUYS I 7635099154 P.26i33 bldwril!>4 Y.26/33 DATA FORM ROUTINE wrTLAND DETERMINATION Q 9R7 COS Wetlands DelitteaUon an a( ... Normal v0umstaneci Exert on a sile7 (Yak No MUM w: e. W, Is the site signiricutly disturbed (Atypical Sitttation)9 l�Ppe"rf[) No Plot ID: etland A is the area a potontial Problem Area? No No F jigs: (If needed, ctsolain on reverse.) e 2 V EVoWFA 1 JUR Sanrvm c to Dom t ant Cie WeatO Co on !"Arne Herb FA W+ 1. PAo greys 2. 3. a. MKnary 6. 9. Percent a tMF�Alet,e udin FAC-). 100°/. Rtmarks! Monotypie stand of reed canary grass HYDROLOGY Field _Recorded Dili (Describe in RemarttS) Stream, LDke, or Tide Geuge 70t AcriDl Photographs Other Recorded Date Available Depth of Surface Water: Depth to Free Water in Pit: (LA.) Depth to Saturated Soil. 12 (iri.) Dry Indicators: —jauttdg ed CLSshtrated in Upper 12 inches Wafer Marks —Drift Lines Dre in"C Patterns in Wetlands Idetry Irsdfenton (2 or mors re4uir4d): _Oxidized Root ChL=ela in Upper 12" Weter•Staiaed Leaves IZLOC41 SOLI Survey Data fX FAC-Neutral Test in Remarks) 7UL-12-2005 11�_� � ao-caw uor,a CONSULTING MGMT CDNST �LA4= .I INU raa'tl I.UrftI 7635099154 P.27/33 b1L9Nri1S4 P.27/33 SOILS Transco ID: A.Watl_nd Plot ID: Tyne 2 M Of Flags__ Depth inches Rerun 0.6 A � B liydric Soll tndfoalcrs N[stuso] Matrix Color Monle Colors (Mansell Moist) Wunsi ilmoisl) 1 DYR 3r? _ 10 YR //6 10 YR 2/1 10 YR 4/6 Moisture Regime ing Conditions i or Lew -Chrome Colors Mottled to within a few inches of the surface WETLAND DSITAMFNATIO14 Wedn'dHydrology Presat? no Hydrie Soils PresenO F9 No Its Mottle Teuturt, Concrelions, Abuodancel ontrut Structure eta ConuneNdistin loan 1 d loon Concretions High Organic Content in SurPoe�Layer Sandy Soils Organic Streaking in Sandy Listed an Leal Hydric Soils List _Lino i on National flydric Soils List (Explain:in Remarks) this Sampling Point Within a WettanfflC)No (Circle) on the western property boun uy along tree row JU_L_-18-2005 11:10 CONSULTING MGMT CONST vV �rrr '"„ I.UIYJUL1IIVI_] 11101.1$ LJNZl 7635099154 P.28i33 6125099154 P.28i33 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DBTF�RM-1NA Q4CCOE t ands Dellfeatlon Manuel) Projec✓Site: aM1A Bui ding Site Date: >< 1 -01 A p wen ear: a vueiate, LTA Coun Carver IMN Investigator. invade Engineepn es No State Transact [ •Upland Do Normal circumstadees Exist en the site? Plot : Wetlan Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Of Flags! Is the area a potential Problem Ara? Noso Type I (If needed, explain on revase.) asa,c u+ aura Ruminant P tS ccicsWelland o one t tam 1 dicetor I. 2. 3. a, 5. 6, 7, a. 9. escent of Dominant S ecies wetland samp mg point that are OHL, FACW er AC Cexcffdtnr FAC•). 00N Rerouks. Ares was recently plowed undcr, making plant W. impraetabte. Upland vegetation appears to consist of opportunistic weed species HYDROLOGY XM Recorded Data (Describe in Ramarka) Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge XX Aerial Photographs Other Rio Reratded Data Available Depth of Surface Water. 0 (in.) Depth to Free Water is Pit: (in.) Depth to Saturated Soil: >19 (La.) Primary Indicators: _Inundated _Saturated in Upper 12 Inches Water Marks "Drift Lines Sediment Deposits —_Drainage patterns in Wetlands Secondary indicators (1 or more required): Oxidiaad Root Channels in Upper 12" Watrr-Stained Leaves —Local Soil Survey Data FAC•Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks) JUL-18-2005 11:11 Jw-uo- 4,010.) ton•gq JY► V r CONSULTING MGMT CONST t,UN5ULI ING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.29i33 6125099154 P.29i33 SOILS Transcet ID JB Unlsnd Plot ID' Tj e_I o it Name. Lester•K and Phaicl. 6.12°A 0 Of Flags_._ Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors ire a Horizon (Monycll Moist(Munsell Moist) 0.4 A 10Y9412 None 4+ H 1CYR312 Hydric Soil Indicators: Class'. Well Drained Mottle AhundaactlCc"13,1 Tc#ore, Concretions, Strticture, etC_ Lam — loam Hiatosol Histic £pipedon Concretions High Organic Content irk surface Layv Sandy Soils &AIdic Odor Organic Stmakillg in Sandy Soils Aquie Moistwe Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils Lit Reducing Conditions Listed on Nsttonal Hydric Soils List Glcycd of Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain: in Remarks) hydric soil indicators WETLAND DETERMlNATlON Hydropbync VegennDD Present'? Yes (errrde) Wedwd Hydrology Prerentl Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Welland? YnsLNtr, (Cycle) Hvdric Soils Present? Yes �rl JUL-18-2005 11:11 "`'.V W LWJ VY`YY CONSULTING MGMT CONST l.ul`I�UL 111`IU I'xL'l l I.IAV`� I 7635099154 P.30i33 612t)099154 P.30/33 DATA FORM OD ETLAND MINATION {1 g117 CO@ Wetland elinwtron Monu� Do NOMal Cucumstaneaa bMt on We site! Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Is the area a potential Problem Areal A t. roryPanum rp. 3.7. ffOB"FACW jd Percent of DomuunLSpeniea in Wctlan satn ling point . 100% Remarks Monotypie stand of Smartweed HYDROLOGY Stream, Lakc, or Tide Gauge XXX- Aerial Photographs Other Recorded Date Available Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Depth to Free Water in Pit. 6n.) Depth to Saru awd Sail: 12 (in,) Primary Indicators: Inundated X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches Water Marks —Drift Lines Sediment Deposits XDraiUp Pettems in Wetlands Secondary 10dieators (2 or more required): Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" Water -Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data TFAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in would be expected at this time o(year fat JUL-18-2005 11:11 J UL—GCI—C[IYIJ elp•VJ CONSULTING MGMT CONST �4Y I t1`U $-"-II k. VJI 7635099154 P.31i33 otex��ars r.�a��J Som Transect ID' 11„Wc lend Plot IM Tye_ end M Of Flags_ drained No Profile Descri io pcpl}t Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, SWCNre etc, nches Horizon LunssllMeiet) fMurtsellMoistl Abundancr_r-c rat n.6 A 6+ $ I 11 YR?J2 _ 10 R 4/6 Common/ s Hydric Soil Indiulors: Concretions Histosol Histie Epipedon High organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils $ulfidie Odor Orgaolc Socaking in Sandy Soils XXX Aquie Moiamre Regime IL>QX Listed on I,oeal Hydnc Soils List Reducing Conditions XXX LiStedonNationalHyd+icSoibList XXX Gleyed or Low•Chroma Colors Other(Esplain: in Romarka) Mottled to within a few inches of the surface WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic vegetation Presenr? MNo (Cycle) I Is this Semplinc Point Within a Wetland?? tS D (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Prtser!0 No �J Hydric Soils Resent? No JUL-le-2005 11:11 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.32i33 DISTRIBUTION Wetland Determination and Delineation Peterson Property E'A NE Y4 Sec. 27 & SW V4 NW Y4 5ec. 26, T116N, R23W Chanhassen, MN Copy *� Number Copy of Copies Number Mr, Sever Peterson 1590o Plying Claud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Ms. Lori Haak City of Chanhassen 690 City Centre Drive, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mr. Brian Sullivan RLK-Kuusisto 6110 Blue Circle Dr., Suite 100 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 QUALITY CONTROL REVIEWER ' C/c Mike H tgren Group Manager -Environmental Engineering Original Copy 1 Copy 2 JLL-18-2005 11:12 CONSULTING MGMT CONST 7635099154 P.33/33 �'� -- �•••••• ••� 1..i1r ...� i Hari 1 �"4� 1 Cldw"I" Y.33/33 TOTAL P.33 TOTAL P.33 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 Date: June 20, 2005 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Kate Aanenson AICP, Community Development Director Subject: nrPnt Planned Unit Development for property located at 1600 Pioneer Trail Applicant: Sever Peterson Planning Case: 05-20 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on June 17, 2005. The 60-day review period ends August 16, 2005. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, stone water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on July 19, 2005 at 7:00 p.m in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than July 8, 2005. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint/United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. Centex -Point Energy Minnegasco 13. Other - 14. Other - Carver County GIS Mapping Application ;, — r !1 p Map Geared by Lekend Raad Tetl US Hipinrara eN Hiylway: N � Map Created on: Cwq Rwd, �� 6-20-2005 tame Carver Panels County Renal Ph= 2002 This map was created using Carver County's Geographic Information Systems (GIS), it is a compilation of information and data from various City, County, State, and Federal offices. This map is not a surveyed or legally recorded map and is intended to be used as a reference. Carver County is not responsible for any inaccuracies contained herein. J. EDWIN CHADWICK, LLC 11430Zio.Circle Land and Farms B,00mingmn, Minnesnca 55437 Office (952) 853-2473 FAX (952) 886-0492 May 31, 2005 Ms. Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Peterson/Jacques Farm Information Letter Concept PUD Application to follow Dear Ms. Aanenson: This information letter is coming forth at this time after two -years of deliberation and extensive work with city staff, MNDOT and the AUAR team. Timine The letting of the Trunk Highway 212 project and the rapid design/build process being undertaken by the contractor makes this a very time sensitive project. Additionally, the AUAR study has been completed over the last couple of years, the feasibility report for infrastructure for the area is in place and there is a natural synergy of timely land planning and construction in concert with the large Highway 212. The City has indicated that there is a desire to undertake the East West Collector Street and bridge project shortly as well. Clearly the time is now. Ownership Background The property is owned by Mr. Sever Peterson and has a long history with the Peterson family. Mr. Peterson, has owned the farm for four decades and been farming it even longer, having worked with the thrashing crew as a boy assisting his father and grandfather. Due to this long attachment to this parcel of land, Mr. Peterson wants to see a style of development which is sensitive to the existing natural features and takes full advantage of the spectacular views on the site. Existing Land Use The site is currently a mix of farming uses and natural open space adjacent to and including parts of the Primary Bluff Creek Overlay Area. The topography has beautiful rolling hills and is one of the highest points in Chanhassen, resulting in spectacular views at many locations on the site. Adjacent Land Use The land to the west of the site is where Town and Country Homes, Inc. has proposed the Liberty Development, which is a neighborhood of approximately 350 mid -density residential townhomes. The land to the north of the Peterson farm is under contract with Pemtom and is intended for housing. The land to the east of the Peterson farm is controlled by Town and Country Homes, Inc. and is intended for residential development. The land to the south is part of the 2015 and 2020 MUSA expansion areas and also includes the soon -to -be -constructed Highway 212. This area is also near one of the possible new CR 41 river crossing corridors, however, the impact of that potential project is questionable at this time due to the uncertainty of its final location and that the project is unfunded and therefore will likely not occur until after 2020, which should be long after full development of the 2005 MUSA has occurred. Access to Infrastructure The East-West Collector will run through the Peterson property in the northwest corner. This project calls for a nice sweeping boulevard and installation of sewer and water and is intended to start in 2005 or early 2006. The second major roadway improvement will be the road labeled in the AUAR as the Southern Connector Road which will run from the new East-West Collector to Pioneer Trail. Proposed Land Use The proposal is a residential planned unit development (PUD) on approximately 67 acres that is in concert with the residential component that is called forth by the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. The current guidance calls for development of 4-8 units per acre of housing and although the ultimate density is still being worked out in design, we anticipate it will be at the lower end of that density range. This reduced density is due in large part to the constraints of the topography and soils and also due to the desire to preserve and enhance the access to the existing natural resources and views. We want to work with the existing topography and resources rather than over -engineer the site and destroy much of its unique and special character. Issues of density transfer of units that could be built within Bluff Creek Overlay# I but must be relocated out of the Primary district will be worked out over time with City Staff. The East-West Collector and southern Collector roads are proposed to be utilized as buffers between areas of higher and lower densities. Higher densities are proposed on the west side of the site to remain compatible with the adjacent Town and Country Homes, Inc. proposed development and then the density drops off significantly as the topography rises in the east and adjacent to the Bluff Creek Overlay Area. Our engineer did look at the suitability of the topography and soils for non- residential purposes and determined that much of the site was unsuitable for non- residential uses due to topography and soil constraints. That report has been provided to City staff. The Peterson Family would be disappointed if this beautiful site was turned into a sea of parking lots, loading docks and retaining walls. Housing Product Types The land use design would call for three residential product types of varying size and density. The centerpiece of the project is an area of large lot executive home sites which would be overlooking or adjacent to the beautiful Bluff Creek Valley. These homes can be some of the premier homes in the area. There are more 20 acres of the Bluff Creek Park nature area which will preserved as part of this development and these homes will have wonderful views of this amenity as well as a view from the top of Chanhassen. The area west of the Southern Connector Road will be an area of 2-4 unit buildings which will provide a nice transition between Town and Country's offering to the west and the generous single-family homes to east. The area north of the East-West Collector and on the western side of the parcel which would be contiguous with Town and Country will have a higher density townhome product which would be similar to what is being offered by Town and Country in area immediately adjacent to it. This area would likely be physically connected to the Town and Country project through the extension of Town and Country's local street system. If the Town and Country project ends up reducing density adjacent to this area, it could be redesigned for more executive homes due to its proximity to the Bluff Creek Overlay and terrain. We look forward to receiving input from the City regarding this proposal so that we can then move forward with the more detailed design information that will be needed for the City Engineer's final roadway design on the East-West Collector and related infrastructure projects. Sincerely E. Chadwick nclosure —I kn 0 0 N M ~J < m N " v y vW V Vv J_Y YD G p; �U W I.0 3W LLV m owt, Z O < O Z< m r0 y mpU r0 N_ mpU Or OW O z d d U dW < pU WNW\ y��r rlwi0 WW y�4w ulwiN LLIFr�LL Z NNK U O N_ ✓1 NnvOjp�gyw W� NOIWi 1Wi o- WO<y\j NN41Wiv�� a 02 O Q 30 w F4NZ OY..f UK FQKyC�Z r^n Oty.w FQK�2 NNYfOWYW. /. UQQ ry i d < Q a o FL Kp Zm<>J J O <Z 2N. >J JQO OY.. VK ZNU» QO Y�'¢V �UY "xF Shp 1 O O U w O nhm�P QU jm<`Zrr 0 O WN�Ym d 3m QUrZr N'NYO� r<<UrZ nN JU N d VI d m pN Q Q YfH� O l;Nd Mo.(/I.-T .. Nd �p Nr LI -. VIK 11JJ z-p-Nwr dQ OJ K ¢ ¢ d W O W2 W<d I d'Dx I�d ZdpSO (/I ND U V U U> N NDyIYY..<..O< W <SJ O<JwF �d J N}6<�1 li LLL LLpOJ 0 K -piaN YQ2S � F "Q3U ®so $ O zJz4%YJslm '6aoZa z 86 ooaoi� �n r-z-- z oirc-0 r oxZ oo �- w o m m m m iza JJ o �¢w_ zz� Q JJ o raw_- dV13E z< ,Roa sW_Q_ W d® ION ;©�;:, 2 cep `w..Li �a: Y y _ 75 I � • 6SCM 110 Cmlw / \ I µnMuW leWM ' z 700 0 700 1400 Feet 3 Chanhassen AUAR Peterson Bluff Potential Road Layout FM Foz Figure 1 2S p - ». . : .y .. . IV ZAR ra a .fir, �., grail (HwO''. 1 �Qi . brad IN Pioneer v- Haak, Lori From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Kate: Thank you for send the SWCD does not development. Howe Creek, bluff areas management will be have more specific control during the Thank you, Mlynek, Aaron - Waconia, MN [aaron.mlynek@mn.nacdnet.net] Friday, July 08, 2005 3:39 PM Aanenson, Kate Haak, Lori Peterson Concept PUD ng notice and information on the Peterson Concept PUD. At this time, .ave specific comments or recommendations concerning the overall er, due to the sensitive nature of the area, which includes Bluff and highly erodable soils, erosion, sediment control and stormwater of concern in upcoming planning phases of development. The SWCD will comments regarding stormwater management, erosion control and sediment preliminary plans and final plan. Aaron Mlynek, CPESC Urban Conservation Technician Carver Soil and Water Conservation District 219 East Frontage Road Waconia, MN 55387 (P): 952-442-5101 (F): 952-442-5497 (C): 952-393-1146 M am a WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION For: Peterson Property E1/2 NE1/4 Section 27& SW1/4, NW1/4 Section 26, T116N, R23W Chanhassen, MN Prepared for: Sever Peterson 15900 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. 11000 93 "Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369 1500 First Avenue NE Rochester, MN 55906 WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION FOR: PETERSON PROPERTY E 1/2 NE 1/4 SECTION 27 & SW 1/4 NW 1/4 SECTION 26, T116N, R23W CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR; - SEVER PETERSON 15900 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN W9:4VA0:111WA PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. 11000 93RD AVENUE NORTH MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 PINNACLE PROJECT NUMBER: MN01165.00 Prepared By: ,., Matt Bartus Environmental Scientist SEPTEMBER 13, 2001 Reviewed By: Li -L 4 L Mike Hultgren Group Manager Environmental Engineering Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................. 1.1 Introduction ..................................... 1.2 Scope ................................................ 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2.1 Site Location and Use .................... 2.2 Surveys and Maps .......................... 2.2.1 Soil Survey .............................. 2.2.2 USGS Topographic Maps...... 2.2.3 NWI Maps ............................... 2.2.4 PWI Maps ................................ 3.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION.... 3.1 Methodology .................................. 3.2 Wetland Descriptions .................... 4.0 CONCLUSION .................................. 5.0 STANDARD OF CARE 6.0 REFERENCES ................ DISTRIBUTION .............................................. PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. .5 .5 Last Page of Document WETLAND DELINEATION i rKelil N 41 FIGURE 1: Site Location Map FIGURE 2: Carver County Soil Survey Map FIGURE 3: National Wetland Inventory Map FIGURE 4: Protected Wetland Inventory Map FIGURE 5: Wetland Locations APPENDIX A: Data Forms PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. APPENDICES WETLAND DELINEATION ll 1.0 INTRODUCTION ' 1.1 Introduction ' Mr. Sever Peterson, the current land owner and Mr. Brian Sullivan of RLK-Kuusisto retained Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. (Pinnacle) to perform a wetland delineation on ' portions of the 120-acre Peterson property located north of Pioneer Trail within the E 1/2 NE 1/4 of Section 27 and SW 1/4 NW 'ASection 26, T116N, R23W in Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota (Site) (Figure 1). 1.2 Scope ' Pinnacle conducted the Wetland Determination and Delineation in accordance with the criteria established in the 1987 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland delineation manual, updated in 1997, and the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Circular 39. The ' work included the following items: ' An initial site reconnaissance. • Review of the Site utilizing County Soil Surveys, USGS topographic maps, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory (PWI) ' maps, and National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Maps. • Review of Farm Service Agency (FSA) aerial slides, • Assessment and delineation of the potential wetlands identified in the background review. • Preparation and submittal of this report summarizing the findings of our work. ' 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ' 2.1 Site Location and Use ' The Site is located north of Pioneer Trail, east of Audubon Road in Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota within the NE 1/4 of Section 27, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, as reviewed on the Shakopee, Minnesota quadrangle map (Figure 1). The Site consists of approximately 120 acres of undulating, undeveloped agricultural land, which is comprised of tillable farmland, tree rows, fallow land, wetlands and portions of Bluff Creek. The Site is in an agricultural area of Chanhassen that is currently experiencing substantial development. This delineation concentrated on the western and southern portions of the Site and any wooded areas and the Bluff Creek corridor and its associated wetlands were not investigated as part of this delineation. ' PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. WETLAND DELINEATION 1 ' 2.2 Surveys and Maps Pinnacle conducted a review of the Carver County Soil Survey, topographic, PWI and ' NWI maps, and FSA aerial slides for the vicinity of the Site. The following sections summarize the information available at the time of this review. ' 2.2.1 Soil Survey The Carver County Soil Survey was reviewed for soils information pertaining to the Site. The Soil Survey indicated that the soils at the Site consist of Hamel loam, Lester - Kilkenny loams, (6-25% slopes, eroded), Houghton-Muskego soils, Terril loam, and ' Glencoe clay loam. Of the mapped soil types, the Hamel loam, Houghton-Muskego soils, and Glencoe clay loam were listed on the hydric soils lists. A copy of the Carver County soil survey is included as Figure 2. ' 2.2.2 USGS Topographic Maps ' The topography of the Site is undulating with a range in elevation from approximately 870 to 950 feet above mean sea level (MSL) as reviewed on the Shakopee, Minnesota ' Quadrangle map. Based on contour intervals on the quadrangle map, surficial drainage is predominately to the northeast, toward the Bluff Creek stream channel. 2.2.3 NWI Maps The Shakopee, Minnesota NWI map depicted two wetland basins and a riverine system ' (Bluff Creek) on the Site. The mapped wetland basins were depicted as Palustrine, Emergent, Seasonally Flooded, partially drained/ditched (PEMCd) basins and were ' located along the western boundary and in the northern portion adjacent to the stream channel. The stream channel was mapped as a Riverine, Intermittent, Streambed (R4SB). A copy of the NWI map is included as Figure 3. 2.2.4 PWI Maps The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has designated Protected waters in Minnesota which are identified on PWI maps. The PWI map for Carver County, Minnesota indicated that Bluff Creek on the north side of the Site is mapped as part of ' protected water 209W (Figure 4). ' PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. WETLAND DELINEATION 2 2.2.5 Farm Service Agency slide review Aerial slides of the Site and surrounding area for the years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000 were reviewed by Pinnacle at the Carver County FSA on August 27, 2001. The reviewed slides were very similar from year to year and depicted the majority of the Site to be in agricultural production. Bluff Creek and a possible wetland area associated ' with the creek were apparent in the northeast portion of the Site. Two isolated basins were also apparent in all of the reviewed slides. One basin was located along the western property boundary, while the other basin was located in the central portion of ' the Site, northwest of the existing farmhouse. The potential wetlands identified during the slide review were consistent with our field observations and their boundaries were flagged and surveyed. No other potential wetlands were identified during the aerial slide review. 3.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION 3.1 Methodology The wetland determinations were made utilizing the techniques of the Routine Method, ' as suggested in the 1987 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, updated February 25, 1997. The conclusions derived in this report are consistent with and respect the wetland criteria recorded in the manual. Determination of hydric soils, ' site hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation were made according to the procedures and guidelines described in the manual. Sampling locations were selected to be representative of wetland, upland and border areas. tMr. Matt Bartus of Pinnacle conducted an assessment of the wetlands at the Site on ' August 17, 2001. The assessment included probing the soils to observe the color and moisture content, as well as other available hydric soil indicators. The characteristics noted for each sampling location are documented in the wetland determination data t forms, which are included as Appendix A. Survey markers were placed along the approximate edge of the wetlands. ' A wetland determination was conducted for all potential wetland areas within the project corridor. Of the two potential wetlands identified in the background review, both wetlands were determined to meet all three wetland criteria and their boundaries ' were flagged and surveyed. The general wetland descriptions are discussed below. Wetland locations are shown in Figure 5. 1 ' PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. WETLAND DELINEATION 3 3.2 Wetland Descriptions Wetland A Wetland A was classified as a Circular 39, Type 2, wet meadow or a Palustrine, Emergent, Seasonally Flooded, partially drained (PEMCd) wetland under the Cowardin classification system. Wetland A is a small, isolated, depressional basin located along the western boundary of the Site. The vegetation within Wetland A consisted of a monotypic stand of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) FACW+, while the adjacent uplands were vegetated by box elder (Ater negundo) FACW- to the west and by foxtail and pioneer weed species in the fallow area to the east that was recently plowed under, making plant identification impractical. The loam soils within Wetland A had a matrix color of 10 YR 3/2 in the A -horizon underlain by a B-horizon with a matrix color of 10 YR 2/1. The soil was distinctly mottled to the surface by mottles with a matrix color of 10YR 4/6. This area was mapped in the Carver County Soil Survey as Hamel loam, which is classified as a hydric soil. This area was also apparent on the Shakopee, MN NWI map as a Palustrine, Emergent, Seasonally Flooded, partially drained (PEMCd) wetland. These observations were consistent with our field observations. This basin was not inundated at the time of the delineation; however, the soils were saturated within the upper 12 inches. Wetland B Wetland B was classified as a Circular 39, Type 1, seasonally flooded basin or a Palustrine, Emergent, Temporarily Flooded (PEMA) wetland under the Cowardin classification system. Wetland B is a depressional area located northwest of the farmhouse in the unfarmed fallow area of the Site. This area was not depicted on the Shakopee, MN NWI map; however, it was mapped in the Carver County Soil Survey as Hamel loam (hydric) and was apparent on all of the reviewed FSA aerial slides. The vegetation within this basin was comprised of a monotypic stand of smartweed (Polygonum sp.) NI, while the adjacent upland vegetation consisted of opportunistic weed species that were recently plowed under, making identification difficult. The soil profile within the upper 12 inches of Wetland B was disturbed due to agricultural activities. Our field observation revealed loam soils comprised of an A horizon with a matrix color of 10 YR 2/1 underlain by a B horizon comprised of 10 YR 2/2 with 10 YR 4/6 mottles being prominent and common to within a few inches of the surface. 4.0 CONCLUSION Pinnacle has performed a Wetland Determination and Delineation of a portion of the Peterson property located north of Pioneer Trail, east of Audubon Road within the NE ' PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. V&T AND DELINEATION 4 1/a of Section 27, T116N, R23W in Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota. The delineation was conducted in accordance with the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, updated February 25,1997. Two wetland areas in the investigated area were determined to have met the wetland criteria of hydric soils, hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation. The estimated wetland boundaries were flagged, surveyed and verified by Ms. Lori Haak of the City of Chanhassen. It should be noted that the Bluff Creek corridor and its associated wetlands in the northeast portion of the Site were not delineated because they were beyond the scope of work for this project. 5.0 STANDARD OF CARE Environmental services performed by Pinnacle for the project have been conducted in a manner consistent with the degree of care and technical skill appropriately exercised by environmental professionals currently practicing in this area under similar budget and time constraints. Recommendations or opinions contained in this report represent our professional judgment and are generally based upon available information and currently accepted practices for environmental professionals. Other than this, no other warranty is implied nor is it expressed. 6.0 REFERENCES USGS. 1958, Revised 1993 Shakopee, Minnesota Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic), U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. National Wetlands Inventory Map. 1991 Shakopee, Minnesota Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series (Topographic), U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Eggers, Steve D. and Reed, Donald M., Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin,1997, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. Lyon, John Grimson, Practical Handbook for Wetland Identification and Delineation, 1993, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,1987, updated February 25,1997, Washington, D. C. ' PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC. WETLAND DELINEATION 5 FIGURES v vFIGURES FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION Peterson Property Chanhassen, MN Figure 1. MEngineering P►nnacle Site Location Map Peterson Property 1600 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, Minnesota Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. Date: Prepared By: 11000 93rd Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369 September 10, 2001 M. Bartus Phone: (763) 315-4501 Fax: (763) 315-4507 Scale: Reviewed By: 1 7 1:25,000 M. Hultgren FIGURE ' CARVER COUNTY SOIL SURVEY MAP ' WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION ' Peterson Property Chanhassen, MN 1 Figure 2. Pinnacle Carver County Soil Survey Engineering Peterson Property 1600 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, Minnesota Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. Date: Prepared By: 11000 93rd Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369 September 10, 2001 M. Bartus Phone: (763) 315-4501 Fax: (763) 315-4507 Scale: Reviewed By: 1:25,000 M. Hultgren FIGURE 3 NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAP ' WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION Peterson Property Chanhassen, MN C�Iqoo PEMA Approximate Site Location --- iJ • y w 77 GolfCour� O t Figure 3. Pinnacle Shakopee, MN NWI Map Peterson Property Engineering 1600 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, Minnesota Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. Date: Prepared By: 11000 93rd Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369 September 10, 2001 M. Bartus Phone: (763)315-45017 Fax: (763) 315-4507 Scale: Reviewed By: 1:25,000 M.HuRgren FIGURE PROTECTED WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION Peterson Property Chanhassen, MN kSKA S„ Figure 4. Pinnacle Carver County PWI Peterson Property AraEngineering 1600 Pioneer Trail Chanhassen, Minnesota Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. 11000 93rd Avenue North Date: Prepared By: Maple Grove, MN 55369 September 10, 2001 K Bartus Phone: (763) 315-4501 Fax: (763) 315-4507 Scale: Reviewed By: No Scale K Hultgren FIGURE 5 WETLAND LOCATIONS MAP WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION Peterson Property Chanhassen, MN a r t qi Q O a hi ,I Wetland A w 3 / / w q � Wetland B l 1 a s - 0.26 Ac I r�'i;�•'e r M ,.f` IOWA I 1.. I 1. I "I I 1� g� Topographic and Boundary <� U� Verification g� r $r r Severin Peterson �g iX< N� l.L..]f1 4R 1RN .ate M M.. W NN �>16D 41l Illy eR \a ♦ el N t c E H W Y . 6 1 3m". C mzry � r ozrvoFz Qa oS o PETERSON HIGHWAY 212 31: FEASABILITY STUDY c S� � en "as a`F C Prapnty Uafablian u �•. sunu.w elYl. a br .rl..bl Oisl. a e.av� x i 8 twr It{ Ibin, My. }} R.1: sq Ewt MI a br w - W rau.al ml. a 5.a:, }%, tw•.E. 11 Ile xvw e.y. }} bl Cow Cenl% Y' la SAjs1 ie tv.nmlL LEGEND e� I ti •S�F L:"'o �� 7 1 v-..•...o�... a a 1 Lit I ga r N !;e'{{. r. BENCHMARK n .... N'O=u7vey sv sw.r� • •� •:oi m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m APPENDIX A DATA FORMS WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION 1 Peterson Property Chanhassen, MN 1 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: RMIA Building Site Date: 8-17-01 Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, LTD County: Carver Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? es No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Is the area a potential Problem Area? No (If needed, explain on reverse.) Transect ID: A -Upland Plot ID: Wetland A # Of Flags: Type 2 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator 1. Setaria viridis Green foxtail Herb 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling point that are OBL, FAC W or FAC (excluding FAC-). 0% Remarks: Area was recently plowed under, making plant I.D. impractable HYDROLOGY XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge XX Aerial Photographs Other No Recorded Data Available Wetland hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: _Inundated _Saturated in Upper 12 Inches _Water Marks _Drift Lines _Sediment Deposits Field Observations: _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _Water -Stained Leaves _Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: No Hydrology SOILS TransectID: A -Upland Plot ID: Type 2 4 Of Flags Map Unit Name: Lester -Kilkenny Loams (Series and Phase): 6-12%slopes, eroded Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type Y No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-4 A 10 YR 4/2 None loam 4+ B 1 OYR 32 loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain: m Remarks) Remarks: No hydric soil indicators WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes jcPFe�(Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes �9J Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes (Circle) Hydric Soils Present? Yes (IT1 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: RMIA Office Building Site Date: 8-17-01 Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, LTD. County: Carver Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? es No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Is the area a potential Problem Area? No (If needed, explain on reverse.) Transect ID: A -Wetland Plot ID: Wetland A # Of Flags: Type 2 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator I. Phalaris arundinacea Reed canary grass Herb FACW+ 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling point that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 100% Remarks: Monotypic stand of reed canary grass HYDROLOGY XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge XX Aerial Photographs Other No Recorded Data Available Field Observations Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Depth to Saturated Soil: 12 (in.) Wetland hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: Inundated X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches _Water Marks _Drift Lines _Sediment Deposits _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" Water -Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data X FAC-Neutral Test in Remarks) SOILS Transect ID: A -Wetland Plot ID: Type 2 # Of Flags Map Unit Name Hamel loam (Series and Phase): Drainage Class: Poorly drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Argiaquolls Confirm Mapped Type Y No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-6 A I OYR 3/2 10 YR 4/6 Common/distinct loam 6+ B 10 YR 2/1 10 YR 4/6 Common/distinct loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils XXX Aquic Moisture Regime XXX Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions XXX Listed on National Hydric Soils List XXX Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain: in Remarks) Remarks: Mottled to within a few inches of the surface WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? a No (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? No Hydric Soils Present? No on the western property this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?Jf8S1No (Circle) along tree row DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual Project/Site: RMIA Building Site Date: 8-17-01 Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, LTD County: Carver Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? es No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Is the area a potential Problem Area? No (If needed, explain on reverse.) Transect ID: B-Upland Plot ID: Wetland B # Of Flags: Type 1 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling point that are OBL, FAC W or FAC (excluding FAC-). 0% Remarks: Area was recently plowed under, making plant I.D. impractable. Upland vegetation appears to consist of opportunistic weed species HYDROLOGY XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge XX Aerial Photographs Other No Recorded Data Available Wetland hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: _Inundated _Saturated in Upper 12 Inches _Water Marks _Drift Lines _Sediment Deposits Field Observations: _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" Depth to Free Water in Pit (in.) —Water-Stained Leaves _Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: No Hydrology SOILS Transect ID: B-Upland Plot ID: mil_ # Of Flags Map Unit Name: Lester -Kilkenny Loams (Series and Phase): 6-12% slopes, eroded Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type Y No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 04 A 10 YR 4/2 None loam 4+ B 10YR 3/2 loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain: in Remarks) s:ric soil indicators r WETLAND DETERMINATION ' Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �Ne�(Circle) Wetand Hydrology Present? Yes �—IpJ Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes I�E) (Circle) Hydric Soils Present? Yes (Rol DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Peterson Property Date: 8-17-01 Applicant/Owner. RLK-Kuusisto, LTD. County: Carver Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? es No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? No Is the area a potential Problem Area? No (If needed, explain on reverse.) Transect ID: B-Wetland Plot ID: Wetland B # Of Flags: Type 1 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator 1. Polygonum sp. Smartweed Herb NI 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling point that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 100% Remarks: Monotypic stand of Smartweed HYDROLOGY XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge XX Aerial Photographs Other No Recorded Data Available Wetland hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: Inundated X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches _Water Marks _Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Field Observations: X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" Depth to Free Water in Ph: (in.) —Water-Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: 12 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: No hydrology at the time of delineation, which would be expected at this time of year for Type 1 basins SOILS Transect ID: A -Wetland Plot ID: Type # Of Flags Map Unit Name Hamel loam (Series and Phase): Drainage Class: Poorly drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Argiaquolls Confirm Mapped Type Y No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-6 A 10YR2/1 10YR4/6 Common/distinct loam 6+ B 10 YR 22 10 YR 4/6 Common/distinct loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils XXX Aquic Moisture Regime XXX Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions XXX Listed on National Hydric Soils List XXX Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colon; Other (Explain: in Remarks) Remarks: Mottled to within a few inches of the surface WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? a No (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland?Jf61�No (Circle) Hydric Soils Present? No v I basin located in the central, fallow portion of the Site DISTRIBUTION Wetland Determination and Delineation Peterson Property E 1/2 NE 1/4 Sec. 27 & SW 1/4 NW 1/4 Sec. 26, T116N, R23W Chanhassen, MN Copy # Z Number of Copies 1 Mr. Sever Peterson 15900 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55347 1 Ms. Lori Haak City of Chanhassen 690 City Centre Drive, PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 Mr. Brian Sullivan RLK-Kuusisto 6110 Blue Circle Dr., Suite 100 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 QUALITY CONTROL REVIEWER Mike Hultgren Group Manager -Environmental Engineering Copy Number Copy 1 Copy 2 Mv_ b �Gt�,., V �� - i �� 3�� ` RUG-29-2001 11:41 INNRCLE ENGINEERING 763 315 4507 P.01i02 11000 93rd Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 66369 Phone: 612/315-4501 Fax: 612/315-4507 email: pinnacle@scc.net FAX COVER SHEET Date: August 29 2001 To: Ms. Lori Haak Company: City of Channhassen Fax No.: (952) 937-5739 From: Matt Bartus Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: ADDITIONAL MESSAGES: Lori - Here is a hand drawn sketch to give you an idea of the approximate wetland locations on the Peterson property. We will try to get you a better drawing tomorrow. Matt CONFIDENTIAL FAX The information contained in this facsimile is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual named on the cover sheet. If the reader of this message is not the intended recepient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hearby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, and return the original message to us at the address listed on the cover sheet via the U.S. Postal System. Thank you. Haak, Lori From: Matt Bartus [mbartus@pineng.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:40 PM To: Lori Haak Subject: Peterson property delineation E Wedand Wetland Wetland Wetland A-Upland.doc A-Wedand.doc B-Upland.doc B-Wedand.doc Lori - Here are the data sheets for the delineation on the Peterson property located at 1600 Pioneer Trail that I left you a voicemail about. It is a 120 acre parcel located in the NE 1/4 of Section 27, T116N, R23W , however we did not delineate the whole parcel. sluff Creek runs through the norhtern portion of the Site and we did not delineate any thing associated with the creek, wooded areas or the northern portion of the Site. In other words, we investigated the southern 2/3 of the Site. We are in the process of producing a map, I will try to get it to you tomorrow. In the mean time I can fax you a hand drawn map. I would still like to arrange an on -Site meeting to have you verify the delineation lines. I will be on vacation all of next week, but my co-worker, Scott Thelen, would be able to meet you out there. Thanks -Matt 1 Haak, Lori From: Matt Bartus [mbartus@pineng.com] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:09 AM To: Haak, Lori Subject: RE: Peterson property delineation Sounds good, Thanks Lori -----Original Message ----- From: Haak, Lori[mailto:lhaak@ci.chanhassen.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:09 AM To: 'Matt Bartus' Subject: RE: Peterson property delineation Matt I received the data sheets and the fax, so I will review those and contact Scott early next week. (I have his number and email from working with him before.) Have a nice vacation! Lori Haak Water Resources Coordinator City of Chanhassen 690 City Center Drive, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: 952.937.1900, Ext. 105 Fax: 952.937.5739 E-mail: lhaak@ci.chanhassen.mn.us DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: RMIA BuildingSite Date: 8-17-01 Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, LTD County: Carver Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? es No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es No Is the area a potential Problem Area? No (If needed, ex lain on reverse.) Transect ID: A-U land Plot ID: Wetland A # Of Flags: Type 2 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator 1. Setaria viridis Green foxtail Herb 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling int that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). Oho Remarks: Area was recently plowed under, making plant I.D. impractable HYDROLOGY XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge XX Aerial Photographs Other No Recorded Data Available Wetland hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: _Inundated _Saturated in Upper 12 Inches _Water Marks _Drift Lines _Sediment Deposits Field Observations: _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) —Water-Stained Leaves _Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: No Hydrology SOILS Transect ID: A -Upland Plot ID: Type 2 # Of Flags Map Unit Name: Lester -Kilkenny Loams (Series and Phase): 6-12% slopes, eroded Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type Y No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretion, inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc. 0-4 A 10 YR 4/2 None loam 4+ B IOYR 3/2 loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretion Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain: in Remarks) Remarks: No hydric soil indicators WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (Circle) Wetland Hydrology 11hV Is this Sampling Point Within a Welland? Yes©o (Circle) Present? Yes Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Remarks: Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: RMIA Office Building Site Date: 8-17-01 Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, LTD. County: Carver Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? es No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es No Is the area a potential Problem Area? No (If needed, explain on reverse.) Transect ID: A -Wetland Plot ID: Wetland A # Of Hags: Type 2 VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator 1. Phalaris arundinacea Reed canary grass Herb FACW+ 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling oint that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 100% Remarks: Monotypic stand of reed canary grass HYDROLOGY XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge XX Aerial Photographs Other No Recorded Data Available Wetland hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: _Inundated X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches _Water Marks _Drift Lines _Sediment Deposits Field Observations: _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water -Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: 12 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: soIIS Transect ID: A -Wetland Plot ID: TTe_ # Of Flags Map Unit Name Hamel loam (Series and Phase): Drainage Class: Poorly drained Field Observations TaxonomySubgroup): Ty is Ar iaquolls Confirm Mapped Tye Y No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc. 0-6 A IOYR 3/2 10 YR 4/6 Common/distinct loam 6+ B 10 YR 2/1 10 YR 4/6 Common/distinct loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils XXX Aquic Moisture Regime XXX Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions XXX Listed on National Hydric Soils List XXX Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain: in Remarks) Remarks: Mottled to within a few inches of the surface WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ]F ��No (Circle) Hydric Soils Present? No �J Type 2 basin located on the western property boundary along tree row Approved by HQUSACE 3192 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: RMIA Building Site Date: 8-17-01 Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, LTD County: Carver Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? es No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es No Is the area a potential Problem Area? it<No (If needed, explain on reverse.) Transect ID: B-U land Plot ID: Wetland B # Of Flags: Type 1 VEGETATION Dominant Plant S ecies Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling int that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 0% Remarks: Area was recently plowed under, making plant I.D. impractable. Upland vegetation appears to consist of opportunistic weed species HYDROLOGY XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge XX Aerial Photographs Other _No Recorded Data Available Wetland hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: _Inundated _Saturated in Upper 12 Inches _Water Marks _Drift Lines _Sediment Deposits Field Observations: _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper IT' Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water -Stained Leaves _Local Soil Survey Data Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: No Hydrology sons Transect ID: B-Upland Plot ID: Twe 1 # Of Flags Map Unit Name: Lester -Kilkenny Loams (Series and Phase): 6-12% slopes, eroded Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgrou ): Confirm Ma ed Tye Y No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Mansell Moist) (Mansell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc. 0-4 A 10 YR 4/2 None loam 4+ B IOYR 3/2 loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils Sullidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain: in Remarks) Remarks: No hydric soil indicators WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes No (Circle) Hydric Soils Present? Yes No Remarks: Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: RMIA Office Building Site Date: 8-17-01 Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, LTD. County: Carver Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? es No Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? es No Is the area a potential Problem Area? No (If needed, explain on reverse.) Transect ID: A -Wetland Plot ID: Wetland A # Of Flags: Tye 2 VEGETATION Dominant Plant S cies Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator 1. Polygonum amphibium Smartweed Herb OBL 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling oint that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 100% Remarks: Monotypic stand of Smartweed HYDROLOGY XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge XX Aerial Photographs Other _No Recorded Data Available Field Observations: Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Depth to Saturated Soil: 12 (in.) Wetland hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators: _Inundated X Saturated in Upper 12 Inches —Water Marks _Drift Lines _Sediment Deposits X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): _Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12" Water -Stained Leaves X Local Soil Survey Data X FAC-Neutral Test Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: No hydrology at the time of delineation, which would be expected at this time of year for Type 1 basins Transect ID: A -Wetland Plot ID: Tie_ # Of Flags Map Unit Name Hamel loam (Series and Phase): Drainage Class: Poorly drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ty is Argiaquolls Confirm Mapped Type Y No Profile Description: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc. 0-6 A IQYR 2/1 10 YR 4/6 Common/distinct loam 6+ B 10 YR 2/2 10 YR 4/6 Common/distinct loam Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol Concretions Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils XXX Aquic Moisture Regime XXX Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Reducing Conditions XXX Listed on National Hydric Soils List XXX Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain: in Remarks) Remarks: Mottled to within a few inches of the surface WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No (Circle) Wetland Hydrology Present? Pli No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? es o (Circle) Hydric Soils Present? No Remarks: Isolated Type I basin located in the central, fallow portion of the Site Approved by HQUSACE 3/92