The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-10_2018-10 SUB & VAR OWNER: TOM GONYEAr- Do Imo- to n ' Pi PROFESSIONAL & A S SO C I AT I O N October 29, 2018 Thomas J. Campbell* Roger N. Knutson Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehler MacKenzie Walters, Asst. Planner Soren M. Mattick Henry A. Schaeffer, III c/o City of Chanhassen Alina Schwartz 7700 Market Boulevard Shana N. Conklin P.O. Box 147 Amy B. Schutt Chanhassen, MN 55317 James J. Monge, III Jerome M. Porter David S. Kendall Re: Plat of Red Cedar Point Matthew K. Brokl Kurt S. Fischer Dear MacKenzie: *Of cnunul Please find enclosed for the City's files, the original recorded documents regarding the plat of Red Cedar Point that were returned to us from Custom Home Builders title. Copies of these documents were e-mailed to you on September 12, 2018. Thank you. Very truly yours, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Jean M. Olson, Legal As /jmo Enclosure Grand Oak Office Center 1 860 Blue Gentian Road Suite 290 SCANNED Eagan, Minnesota 55I2I Main: 651-452-5000 Eax: 651-234-6237 s%wvexk-law(om 199698vl Document No. T207224 OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Filed on -August 02, 2018 3:48 PM Cert # 39860 IIIIIIII IIIII III III 207224 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA -.. VARIANCE 2018-10 Fee: $46.00 Kaaren Lewis Registrar of Titles 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen City Council approves a variance to City Code Article XII, Section 20- 615(2), lot setbacks, allowing a minimum lot frontage of 79.96 feet. 2. Property. The variance is for the Red Cedar Point subdivision situated in the City of Chanhassen, and legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, Red Cedar Point Road, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. SCANNED '�A Custom Home Builders Title 9th, 2018 MIMMMMNM., vA. STATE OF MINNESOTA (ss COUNTY OF CARVER CITY OF CHANHASSEN I.", MA City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thiday of ; 2018 by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of hanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. qfA TKI:MLT. MEUWISSEN oPublic-Minnesota-iaebn E�ires Jan " 2020 DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 AAA NOTARY PUBLIC 2 Document No. T207222 OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Filed on -August 02, 2018 148 PM Cert # 39694 1111111111111111111 207222 CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) Fee: $46.00 Kaaren Lewis Registrar of Titles I, Kim T. Meuwissen, duly appointed and acting Deputy Clerk for the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of Resolution No. 2018-39 "Approving a Final Plat with a Variance for Red Cedar Point" adopted by the Chanhassen City Council on July 9, 2018 with the original copy now on file in my office and have found the same to be a true and correct copy thereof Witness my hand and official seal at Chanhassen, Minnesota, this 10`s day of July, 2018. Kim Meuwissen, Deputy &JZk + m c'�_ SCANNED Custom Home Builders Title CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: July 9, 2018 RESOLUTION NO: 2018-39 MOTION BY: Ryan SECONDED BY: Campion A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT WITH A VARIANCE FOR RED CEDAR POINT WHEREAS, Estate Development Corporation has requested a subdivision of the property located at 3681 Red Cedar Point Road into two single-family lots with areas of 20,417 square feet and 23,572 square feet; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision complies with all requirements of the Chanhassen City Code, and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 19, 2018 and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance and recommended approval of the subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby approves the final plat with a variance for Red Cedar Point, creating two lots subject to the following conditions: Buildine: 1. Provide a 1:200 "clean" plat drawing. 2. Demolition permits required for the removal of any existing structures. 3. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 5. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 6. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. Eneineerine: 1. Drawing 4 — Site and Utility Plan: a) Change detail 1006 (Gate Valve and Box Installation) to detail 1005 (Water Service). b) Add City details 5202A (Bituminous Street Patching), 5203 (Curb and Gutter), 5208 (Concrete Driveway), 5209 (Bituminous Driveway), and 5221 (Tie Card). c) An abandoned watermain exists between the sanitary sewer and the watermain. Add note to make this known to the sanitary sewer and water installation contractor. 2. Drawing 5 — Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan: a) Add City details 5301 (Rock Construction Entrance) and 5302B (Erosion Control for Individual Lots) b) Provide geotechnical report. c) Include first floor elevation of buildings on adjacent lots. d) Existing and proposed elevations shall be shown at each lot comer and top of the curb at the lot line extension. e) Identify proposed soil stockpile locations. f) If importing or exporting soils for the development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 3. SAC and WAC fees due at the rate in force at time of building permit application. Environmental Resources: Tree protection fencing must be properly installed at the edge of the grading limits as shown on the plans dated 5/15/18. This must be done prior to any construction activities and remain installed until all construction is completed. Any trees lost to construction activities shall be replaced. 2. No equipment or materials maybe stored within the tree protection area. 3. One tree must be planted in the front of each yard, as per city requirements. Parks: 1. Park dedication fees for one lot at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. Plannine: 1. An escrow of 110 percent of the estimated demolition costs for the demolition of the detached garage on lot 2, block 1 must be received, and the detached garage must be removed within four months of the approval of the final plat. Water Resources: All permits and approvals must be received from other regulatory agencies prior to issuing permits. 2. Must show existing and proposed drainage. 3. The applicant will need to pay the surface water management (SWMP) fee for 1.010 acres at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 9 h day July of 2018. ATTEST: T d Gerhardt, City Clerk/Manager YES NO Laufenburger McDonald Ryan Campion zju�uw Denny Lau nburge , Mayor ABSENT Tjomhom T`� 3��\S .... Document No. T207223 OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Filed on -August 02, 2018 3:48 PM Cert # 39860 Fee: $56.00 I I I I I IIIII I II I I RKaaren Lewis egistrar of Titles 207223 PLAT MAP NEW PLAT NAME: RED CEDAR POINT UNDERLYING LEGAL: PART OF GOV. LOT 1 8.116.23 PARENT PID(S) 25.0080700 PLAT FILE/SLEEVE NUMBER RETURN TO: METRO LEGAL CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS FILE:HB-37815 1747 25.653 RED CEDAR POINT wra r� u.armw�.u....�... a..vr.Ytlrr.arsn+r r..4.w M1a. r«a .f.«,.aM1rarerarr w+ardYr M1N.....b...tlr.rarr.reM1r n�rw... a... ar°a.ar�a� udw.�M1..retl�nnrb.eMxa.w�e .M1w u.ar.r. r.r«rwntlM1`°ra u..rworwr.sretlD..r.... grbw.i...sreamn..tl....r.srrr".ssw .ibi :°:°rw Ea+r.w�i..rw. m'11..nbI...Cb Ml46 Paq/rraM1awnwM1.Ya«M1F..4dM1..r M1tl M1.Y1 d.bYo4.1«fibaTYR.In. FY N..ranw...0 �, f Wit ia.rlxlb.. P.nDx.l.mYr...�M.r.wM1M.rm�.I r am�t..rrmwr4«u.draa.areaerorbM1wrda.m«.c..�M..tr nrW IMf Ib.R.d..sMa.rM1x...Yrraw..aM1rarlYafO W1.4«..w s •M1tlaxrbaw.a.awy.�.yssw.4 r.r¢..vM n«uwa...rrr.sraane ...rM1�. x.nwoo..±mn4r�...re. mr+.nx.r.M1m.w4�.y.r..tl4mx.Nr w rwusw..M1r.� eaiiri.::r..drw..rf.M1M1w M1r..saw.my..M1ar M1a rr.ad�br M1lfW lilYl M.l rbtw G..4.ltl.b.YaYY �rM1rM1w.«. m.... w.rx.r�. Wx.wm.�..Yrae.eM1w..bw..wM1v.t..r a+vraM�...er4..r f)♦ GVwbI..Y.Ompwnra�l.rp�.e4gr44pR.O M1 Z'1 aO• m}$. m>Eartmr. m.nar('srvmr a..«...ws..YamW...m Zu�i12018 w*�x.�wmarar..asara o..Yn�.«�'w.+n.r.r.revao�ewa �M1lv.l;Ar.��'�1') 1�<d..�f. Mruwi SSen M1rllw 4wwr[x..Sn al �acaa war.war..aY.mbrw.aaM1m.vtl. rw.,...vr.ivrrrs..war..r.r .ner..r...w.wse..rr....rnar.e•Arr.w.r, r. W w.wwra. a.r«r.arr.awmn. sma.awrsrrsraY.�wrro�wrrrwm..r ar.w.r.M1r ona M11%..a law a� anreorr.avn WJ.InO //�M4LYM1N vtn r..6wlarwM1.N. r.rr u..ww�m Nr_ m.vra ®w.Mr..wm.way. of avraM14wN..�.r.rw..yrw..ywr r.. • ^ staff .m1�,wra.Y«m�m..r�.. a.Ye.dr.e...r r.mm ara A ..Ypd ...e .4. LOMn YIR1.tW I�.I (M..I.i.t iM1r.rwrr.wrbn FOIP reb...�..w...rrrdmmM1r n.... 2. .�9 ui.O.... .✓J IYAws.I.Ww I.imMO V np0. GM9LWT..�ppN //.. .mw�i..r T��u3 rw..�ra.JQ,ws9;-'Hf..r2. 0 ALLIAMT r \ a RED CEDAR POINT / i / I , I , / / / I / i I I I I I Vlgl "MAP 'rtwi wr Wr a,wwc no unux uma.x ,w[ sww sxla s� 1`5 it q I 1_ ___L_ e_ xo* roscut 4.2 ne :am mu oaw �u�°aul a FaceW m • e.� I,EIO1MutPT6w6e1T,. SYIt /IMI,e „orm.uMan�m, e..ue®n,ws�rueea e mm.mm,. mm..a .. m.m C cmy n 191]5• rvm oNa�n. anon ® om.,w ce.e Ca ty e..t n mm.mmf fame (mr 5.m) om I. a.a I— .m cmnrKm..1 rm... sal (.E) o .mm .1.m e... ALti�AMT Chanhassen City Council — July 9, 20128 VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. ?-` \ to RED CEDAR POINT: APPROVAL OF PRELEVIINARY AND FINAL PLAT WITH A VARIANCE FOR A TWO LOT SUBDIVISION. Mayor Laufenburger: Is this your's Ms. Aanenson? Kate Aanenson: Yes it is. Mayor Laufenburger: Good evening. Welcome to the council. Kate Aanenson: Thank you. Thank you Mayor, members of the council. This item is a request for a two lot split. It did appear before the Planning Commission on June 19'. They did recommend approval and I will go through some of the comments on that in a minute but tonight before you then is for the final plat with approval of a variance and adoption by resolution. The location is at 3861 Red Cedar Point. There have been some other remodeling's and tear down's with variances on Red Cedar Point but this is a much larger lot. Just a little over one acre so it's, meets the requirements as far as area. It's deficient on some of the frontage which I'll go through in a minute. Again the second lot in off of Minnewashta Parkway on Red Cedar Point and the house was built in 1957 and now they would like to be able to sell and split the lot. So the minimum requirement is 15,000. Both lots will exceed the minimum requirement. The variance is for the portion of the frontage. There is an existing garage on the proposed new lot and that will be removed and then built onto the attached to the existing house. So again the garage must be replaced. All single family dwellings do require two car garage. Except for the width on the one lot, the one will be 23,000. The other will be just over 20,000 square feet. Again there's a pretty good tree canopy on both lots. As you can see on the proposed lot there will be some tree removal for the placement of the home but the significant amount of tree will remain. Both canopy covers do meet the coverage requirements. For the park plan there are trails and Roundhouse Park servicing this lot and there will be a charge for the park fee as a part of the extraction for the new lot. Again the right-of-way and easements. There is an existing drainage easement and new drainage easements will be required around the perimeters of the property. So the variance request itself then will be 10 feet deficient on the frontage so in looking at the opportunities to, other ways to accomplish the variance request would be one would be to put an eyebrow in. Do kind of a caddy whompis lot line or get a variance for a flag lot so the staff in reviewing this, because both lots exceed the minimum felt that the 10 foot deficiency on the frontage could be accomplished a number of different ways so we were supportive of the variance itself. So with that we did recommend approval because all the other requirements can be met. So again there was some neighborhood comments and those were just regarding a precedent of maybe not meeting the lot width and then future setback issues. There are no other variances and there's plenty of lot coverage so if they wanted to add on even in the future either house has that capability. So again one property within the 500 feet, properties on Red Cedar Point did not meet the requirements. The subdivision can go forward with no variance so we are supportive of that and we believe that minimizing the impervious surface Chanhassen City Council — July 9, 20128 within the shoreland district, which this lot is, and the importance of the 90 foot frontage and again because they are well in excess of the area and that we are recommending the preliminary plat approval with the variance. So with that we are recommending approval of the final plat with a 10 foot variance and the conditions of approval and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision and approval of the resolution so with that I'd be happy to answer any questions that you have. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you Ms. Aanenson. So we have a staff report. Is there any questions or comments from council? Mr. Campion I think you. Councilman Campion: Pointing at him. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh you were directing to Mr. McDonald. Mr. McDonald, do you have a question or comment? Councilman McDonald: I have a question. I read through the report and okay I'm a little confused. So if 1 am you can tell me but you said that if we did some type of a cul-de-sac then at that point there wouldn't be a need for the variance and I didn't understand that. How could that? Kate Aanenson: Slue. It's on this one here. If you can see this one. This would create an eyebrow. We have one of those on Lake Lucy so it'd just create additional hard cover. Additional pavement width there and that would make the 90 foot frontage. Both houses meet 90 feet at the front setback line. It's just that part that's contiguous to the right-of-way so we have that situation on Lake Lucy. Do you see what I'm saying this eyebrow here so that would be paved so they'd have frontage on and dedicated. You could dedicate that so you're just adding to the impervious in that area so we felt like, because you're trading one benefit to you know to get to the frontage without the variance. Councilman McDonald: Right and that's already an area where we have enough problems with runoff. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. That's why we didn't feel that was a viable solution so there would be a way to make it work but it seems to make more sense to. Councilman McDonald: Okay, well I appreciate that and I have a better understanding now. Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: As to your question Mr. McDonald, the answer is yes. You were confused. Councilman McDonald: Yes. Chanhassen City Council — July 9, 20128 Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, any other questions or comments? Councilwoman Ryan: I just have a question. Mayor Laufenburger. Go ahead please Councilmember Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: General area when I was looking at the map, can you, I think it was your very first slide and it's not, I know we're trying to be specific to this but how, when you divide those Tots that doesn't affect access to any of those center lots. Kate Aanenson: No. Councilwoman Ryan: It just when you talk about the development, the future development and we're starting to change some of the lot lines and variances. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Councilwoman Ryan: How, if, and I know that was a concern of one of the neighbors. How does that then impact the subdivision or the division of other lots in that area? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, so that's a good question because we're working on some other ones right now. Everybody's looking for lots that they can split right? So there's, our goal as the planning department is to make sure you're not creating, splitting one lot at the deference of somebody else. They can't, you know so you're land locking somebody so we have that to say, is there an opportunity to provide access to the piece to the south so Mr. Gonyea can tell you that was one of the first questions we ask because there is a potential for the property to the south to subdivide. There's a big wetland and it's a steep slope and so really the connection couldn't be made at that piece but that's a great question. That's something we always look at to say, how does this affect the surrounding properties. Councilwoman Ryan: Right. Kate Aanenson: So in this piece it kind of goes by itself. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Kate Aanenson: The other properties would get access, you try not to come out additional access onto a collector so we would not want to provide additional access onto Minnewashta Parkway but there are other opportunities. There's some just remnant pieces in there but we looked at other ways to assemble some of those that they could be subdivided. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Okay. Chanhassen City Council — July 9, 20128 Kate Aanenson: That was a good question Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Anything else? Is the applicant with us this evening and would you like to address the council? State your name please and address. Tom Gonyea: Sure. Good evening Mayor and members of the council. Tom Gonyea representing Estate Development, 15250 Wayzata Boulevard in Minnetonka. I think Kate's presentation was pretty complete. It's a fairly simple lot split. We did look at some of the options in the other, accessing other properties around it and there is some restrictions to that. It really seemed like the best option to do it exactly how we're proposing tonight and I think it will definitely be an add to the area and one new house and the other one, plan on putting an attached two car garage with a little bit of space behind it potentially. Anyways so it should enhance the value of that house as well. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright Mr. Gonyea you're familiar with all of the Findings of Fact and all of the stipulations associated with the subdivision? Tom Gonyea: Yes I am. Mayor Laufenburger. Oka, alright. And they're agreeable to you? Tom Gonyea: Yes they are. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Any questions or comments for Mr. Gonyea? Okay, thank you very much Tom. Tom Gonyea: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. Let's bring it back to the council. Unless there's any further questions I would be ready for a comment or action. Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Councilmember Ryan go ahead. Councilwoman Ryan: I'd like to propose a motion that the City Council approve the preliminary and final plat for Red Cedar Point and a 10.04 foot lot frontage variance for Lot 1, Block 1, Red Cedar Point as shown in plans dated May 15, 2018 subject to the conditions of approval and the adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision and the resolution. Mayor Laufenburger: I believe we have a valid motion. wrWa Chanhassen City Council — July 9, 20128 Roger Knutson: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: We do, thank you Mr. Knutson. Is there a second to that motion? Councilman Campion: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Campion. Any further discussion on the motion to approve the preliminary and final plat? Resolution #2018-39: Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council approve the preliminary and final plat for a two lot subdivision, and a 10.04 foot lot frontage variance for Lot 1, Block 1, Red Cedar Point as shown in plans dated May 15, 2018 subject to the following conditions and the adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision: Buildine: 1. Provide a 1:200 "clean" plat drawing. 2. Demolition permits required for the removal of any existing structures. 3. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 5. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 6. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. En ing eering: 1. Drawing 4 — Site and Utility Plan: a) Change detail 1006 (Gate Valve and Box Installation) to detail 1005 (Water Service). b) Add City details 5202A (Bituminous Street Patching), 5203 (Curb and Gutter), 5208 (Concrete Driveway), 5209 (Bituminous Driveway), and 5221 (Tie Card). c) An abandoned watermain exists between the sanitary sewer and the watermain. Add note to make this known to the sanitary sewer and water installation contractor. 2. Drawing 5 — Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan: a) Add City details 5301 (Rock Construction Entrance) and 5302B (Erosion Control for Individual Lots) b) Provide geotechnical report. c) Include first floor elevation of buildings on adjacent lots. Chanhassen City Council — July 9, 20128 d) Existing and proposed elevations shall be shown at each lot comer and top of the curb at the lot line extension. e) Identify proposed soil stockpile locations. f) If importing or exporting soils for the development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 3. SAC and WAC fees due at the rate in force at time of building permit application. Environmental Resources: 1. Tree protection fencing must be properly installed at the edge of the grading limits as shown on the plans dated 5/15/18. This must be done prior to any construction activities and remain installed until all construction is completed. Any trees lost to construction activities shall be replaced. 2. No equipment or materials may be stored within the tree protection area. 3. One tree must be planted in the front of each yard, as per city requirements. Parks: 1. Park dedication fees for one lot at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. Planning: 1. An escrow of 110 percent of the estimated demolition costs for the demolition of the detached garage on lot 2, block 1 must be received, and the detached garage must be removed within four months of the approval of the final plat. Water Resources: 1. All permits and approvals must be received from other regulatory agencies prior to issuing permits. 2. Must show existing and proposed drainage. 3. The applicant will need to pay the surface water management (SWMP) fee for 1.010 acres at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Mayor Laufenburgec That motion carries 4-0. Congratulations Mr. Gonyea. Good luck with your subdivision. Tom Gonyea: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Look forward to seeing that home built yet this summer perhaps. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, July 9, 2018 Subject Resolution201&39:Red CedarPoint —Approval of Preliminary and Final Plat with a Variance for a Two -Lot Subdivision Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: H.1. Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 2018-10 "The Chanhassen City Council approves the preliminary and final plat for Red Cedar Point, a two -lot subdivision, and a 10.04-foot lot frontage variance for Lot 1, Block I as shown in plans dated May 15, 2018, subject to conditions of approval, and adopts the Findings of Fact and Decision." Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the existing lot located at 3861 Red Cedar Point Road to create two lots for single-family detached housing. The applicant intents to save the existing home and construct a new two -car attached garage to replace the detached garage. The applicant is requesting that the City Council concurrently approve the preliminary and final plat The applicant also requests a 10.04-foot variance from the Single Family Residential and Shoreland Management Districts' required 90-foot minimum lot width. The applicant could meet the required 90-foot lot width for both lots through the use of a half cul-de-sac ("eyebrow"); however, this would result in increased lot coverage. Access to the site provided is by Red Cedar Point Road. Sewer and water are available to the site. Staff is recommending approval of the request The full staff report is provided as an attachment BA K RO ND On June 19, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and variance. No member of the public spoke regarding the proposal; however, one email expressing concern about the potential impact of establishing a precedent of allowing deviations from the city's minimum lot widths on the neighborhood was submitted to the Planning Commission before the hearing. During the subsequent discussion of the preliminary plat and variance, Commissioner Madsen asked for clarification on the city's policy regarding partial cul-de-sacs. Senior Planner AI-Jaff stated that in cases where the applicant could install a full cul-de-sac, but it would not make sense to do so, the city allows the use of partial cul-de-sacs. Lake Lucy Road was cited as an example The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed preliminary plat and variance. The June 19, 2018 Planning Commission minutes are included in the Consent Agenda portion of this packet. DISCUSSION The proposed subdivision meets all of the city's subdivision ordinance requirements, save that the proposed lot width for Lot 1, Block 1 does not meet the zoning code's Single Family Residential and Shoreland Management District's minimum lot width. The applicant could meet the required lot width though the use of either a flag lot, which requires a variance from the subdivision ordinance, or the use of a partial cul-de-sac, which would not require any variances. The use of a partial cul-de-sac would create a significant amount of unnecessary impervious surface within the Shoreland Management District Staff believes that minimizing the amount of impervious surface near the city's water resources is of greater importance than requiring the developer to utilize a lot configuration that meets the districts' minimum lot width. Since the requested variance will prevent the creation of additional and unnecessary impervious surface within the shoreland management district and will result in more conventional lot configuration that is broadly in keeping with the overall aesthetics of the neighborhood, the Planning Commission and staff support the proposed variance. Planning Commission and staff recommend that the Chanhassen City Council approve the preliminary and final plat for Red Cedar Point, a two -lot subdivision, and a 10.04-foot lot frontage variance for Lot 1, Block I as shown in plans dated May 15, 2018, subject to the conditions of approval, adoption of he resoluttion and adopts the Findings of Fact and Decision. 1. Provide a 1:200 "clean" plat drawing. 2. Demolition permits are required for the removal of any existing structures. 3. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 5. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 6. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. Enoneering: I . Drawing 4 — Site and Utility Plan: a) Change detail 1006 (Crate Valve and Box Installation) to detail 1005 (Water Service). b) Add City details 5202A (Bituminous Street Patching). 5203 (Curb and Gutter). 5208 (Concrete Driveway), 5209 (Bituminous Driveway), and 5221 (Tie Card). c) An abandoned watermain exists between the sanitary sewer and the watermain. Add note to make this known to the sanitary sewer and water installation contractor. 2. Drawing 5 —Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan: a) Add City details 5301 (Rock Construction Entrance) and 5302B (Erosion Control for Individual Lots). b) Provide geotechnical report. c) Include first floor elevation of buildings on adjacent lots. d) Existing and proposed elevations shall be shown at each lot corner and top of the curb at the lot line extension. e) Identify proposed soil stockpile locations. f) If importing or exporting soils for the development of the site is necessary. the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 3. SAC and WAC fees due at the rate in force at time of building permit application. Environmental Resources: 1. Tree protection fencing must be properly installed at the edge of the grading limits as shown on the plans dated 5/15/18. This must be done prior to any construction activities and remain installed until all construction is completed. Any trees lost to construction activities shall be replaced. 2. No equipment or materials may be stored within the tree protection area. 3. One tree must be planted in the front of each yard, as per city requirements. Pab: 1. Park dedication fees for one lot at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. : 1. An escrow of 110 percent of the estimated demolition costs for the demolition of the detached garage on Lot 2, Block 1 must be received, and the detached garage must be removed within four months of the approval of the final plat. Water Resources: 1. All permits and approvals must be received from other regulatory agencies prior to issuing permits. 2. Must show existing and proposed drainage. 3. The applicant will need to pay the surface water management (SWMP) fee for 1.010 acres at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. a Staff Report 3861 Red Cedar Point a Variance Document 18-10 a Ex1ribit A a Resolution a Findings of Fact (Approval) a Findings of Fact (Denial) a Application for Development Review o Subdivision and Final Plat Narrative o May 15 Variance Narrative a Final Plat Documents a Engineering Memo o Email from Resident F CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: PC DATE: June 19, 2019 CC DATE: July 9, 2016 REVIEW DEADLINE: CASE #: 2018-10 BY: MW, SJ, VS September 18, 2018 "The Chanhassen City Council approves the preliminary and final plat for a 2 lot subdivision, and a 10.04-foot lot frontage variance for lot 1, block 1 Red Cedar Point as shown in plans dated May 15, 2018 subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the findings of fact and decision Feeemmendation" (Note: A motion for denial and appropriate findings of fact are also included at the end of the report.) SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Preliminary and final plat with variance for a 2 lot single-family residential subdivision. LOCATION: 3861 Red Cedar Point Road OWNER AND APPLICANT: Estate Development Corporation Tom Gonyea 15250 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 101 Wayzata, MN 55391 PRESENT ZONING: 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Single Family Residential District, RSF Residential Low Density ACREAGE: Gross: 1.024 acres DENSITY: Gross: 1.95 units/ac Net: 1.010 Net: 1.98 units/ac LEVEL OF CITY IN DECISION -MAKING: The city's discretion in approving or denying a Preliminary and Final Plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The city's discretion in approving or denying a Variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the zoning code for a variance. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 2 of 10 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is proposing to subdivide the existing lot to create 2 lots for a single-family detached housing. The applicant will demolish the existing detached garage and construct a new two car attached garage for the existing home, which will be retained. The applicant will request that the City Council concurrently approve the preliminary and final plat. The applicant is also requesting a variance from the Single Family Residential District's required 90-foot minimum lot width. The applicant could meet the required 90-foot lot width for both lots through the use of a half -cul-de-sac ("eyebrow"); however, this would result in increased lot coverage. Access to the site provided by Red Cedar Point Road. Sewer and water are available to the site. Staff is recommending approval of the request. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3, "Variances" Chapter 20, Article VII, Zoning and water supply/sanitary provisions Chapter 20, Article X11, "RSF" Single Family Residential District Chapter 20, Article XIII, Division 1, Sec. 20-904 "Accessory Structures" Chapter 20, Article XM, Division 1, Sec. 20-905 "Single-family dwellings" Site Constraints The existing house was built in 1957, a detached garage is also present near the center of the property. Staff was unable to determine the construction date of the garage. The high point on the property is near the existing house with an elevation of 972. The low point on the property is southwest corner with an elevation of 954. The existing lot has 169.86 feet of frontage along Red Cedar Point Road and 44,584 square feet of lot area. The site has a net canopy coverage of 42 percent. This site is located within Lake Minnewashta and Lake St. Joe's shoreland management districts. :V �a--. fit 40 .r> �r - r . EX ate— _ Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 3 of 10 No wetlands are present on the site. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This area has land use classification of Residential Low Density in the city's 2030 Comprehensive Plan. This classification requires net densities of between 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre. The applicant's proposal has a net density of 1.98 units/acre which is consistent with the area's land use plan. ZONING ORDINANCE The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) District, and the applicant is not requesting a change to the parcel's zoning. The proposed subdivision would require a variance from the zoning ordinance's minimum lot width. VARIANCE The applicant's proposed lot 1, block I would have a width of 79.96 feet, which is 10.04 feet less than the 90 feet required by sec. 20-615 and sec. 20-480 for properties zoned RSF within the shoreland management district. The applicant has demonstrated that the subdivision could meet the requirements of sec. 20-615 and sec. 20-480 either through the use of a flag lot (Concept C), which would require a variance from the city's subdivision ordinance, or through the dedication of additional public right of way to create a partial cul-de-sac (Concepts A and B). Concept B Concept A Concept C Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 4 of 10 The intent of the zoning code's minimum yard width requirement is to ensure that lots can accommodate a house and garage while meeting the districts 10-foot side yard setbacks. The applicant is proposing retaining the existing home on lot 1, block 1 and has conceptually shown that a two car garage can be added to the existing home while meeting the required 10-foot side yard setbacks. The area around Red Cedar Point is one of the oldest in the city and it has many atypical lot configurations. The majority of properties within 500 feet of the applicant's do meet the required minimum lot width; however, an adjacent property does have an estimated 80 feet of lot frontage. Outside of the 500-foot public notification area, though still within the general neighborhood, are numerous properties along Red Cedar Point road, South Cedar Drive, and Hickory Road that have lot widths significantly below what the applicant is proposing. A property with an approximately 80-foot lot width would not be out of character for the neighborhood. The proposed lot configuration, though it does not meet the district's minimum standards, would be more in keeping with the neighborhood's character than either a flag lot or a partial cul-de-sac solution. All of the proposed alternative configurations have significant drawbacks. in the case of concept C, the flag lot would create awkward lot lines that could cause conflict between future homeowners and a more staggered house setback from Red Cedar Point Road. The applicant would also need to apply for and receive a variance from the city's subdivision ordinance in order to create the flag lot. For concepts A and B, the partial cul-de-sac would require the dedication of additional right of way to the city and the installation of additional impervious surface within that right of way. Staff estimates that concepts A and B would lead to the creation of between approximately 1,500 and 2,200 square feet of additional impervious surface. Since the property is located within Lake Minnewashsta and Lake St. Joe's shoreland management district and no new stormwater management improvements are being proposed as part of this subdivision, staff believes it is important to take all possible steps to minimize the amount of new impervious surface generated by this subdivision. Water Resource and Planning staff believe that the shoreland management district's goal of limiting the amount of impervious surface near water resources is of greater importance than the shoreland management district's 90-foot minimum lot width. Since the requested variance will prevent the creation of additional and unnecessary impervious surface within the shoreland management district and will result in more conventional lot configuration that is broadly in keeping with the overall aesthetics of the neighborhood, staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant the requested variance. Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 5 of 10 PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT r , R FO cFOgH AO 'L Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 6 of 10 SITE CONSTRAINTS Existing Home The applicant is proposing to retain the existing home which is located on the eastern side of the property on what will become lot 1, block 1. This home is currently being served by a detached garage located in the center of the property on what will become lot 2, block 1. Section 20-905 requires that all single-family dwellings be provided with at least a two -car garage, and Section 20-904 does not permit accessory structures without the permitted principal structure. The applicant is proposing demolishing the existing detached garage and constructing a new attached garage on lot 1, block 1 in order to comply with city code. Staff is recommending requiring an escrow to ensure that the garage on lot 2, block 1 is removed. The applicant will be required to provide a cost estimate for the removal of the structure and an escrow in the amount of 110 percent of the demolition cost estimate. GRADING. DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL No grading is required beyond what will be associated with demolishing the existing detached garage and screen porch, and constructing the new attached garage and new home. Erosion and sediment control will need to meet the city's requirements. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The proposed development should be designed to meet the city's water quality and water quantity requirements. The proposed development will need to receive any and all required permits and meet the requirements of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The applicant will need to pay the surface water management (SWMP) fee for 1.010 acres at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. At today's rate, that would be a payment of $8,160.80. RIGHT-OF-WAY, STREETS AND EASEMENTS The survey included all easements and right of way shown on the title search of the property dated April 15, 2018 from Stewart Title Guarantee Company. STREETS, DRIVEWAYS & SIDEWALK No new public roadways or walkways are required. Red Cedar Point Road provides right-of-way access to both proposed lots. The property has a 3.5-foot roadway easement that when added to the existing dedicated right of way provides a 50-foot right-of-way corridor for Red Cedar Point Road. While this does not meet the city's current 60-foot right -of --way requirements, numerous roads in this area have a non -conforming 50-feet of dedicated right-of-way and the city does not believe it will be possible to acquire additional right-of-way from the other properties south of Red Cedar Point Rd. For these reasons, the city is not requiring the dedication of additional Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case 42018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 7 of 10 public right-of-way. This will allow the right-of-way to remain consistent with the surrounding area. EASEMENTS The applicant is dedicating 5-foot side and rear, and 10-foot front lot line drainage and utility easements. Drainage and utility easements should be provided as illustrated in the preliminary plat dated May 15, 2018. UTILITIES Sanitary Sewer and Watermain No extension of any public sanitary sewer or watermain trunk lines is required. The existing home will continue to use the current water and sewer service from Red Cedar Point Road. The new home will require a new service connection to the available trunk sanitary sewer and watermain. The fees associated with the service connections will be $2,924.00. The city WAC and SAC fees related to the service connections will be collected with the building permit. LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION Existing Canopy Coverage Proposed Canopy Coverage The site's current estimated tree canopy coverage is 42 percent and the applicant is proposing to maintain a tree canopy coverage of 36 percent. Since this exceeds the City Code's minimum standard of 35 percent tree canopy coverage, no replacement tree planting is required. The lots Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19.2018 Page 8 of 10 will still be required to meet the city's minimum requirement to have one tree located in the front yard. PARKS & RECREATION The property has access to the Minnewashta Parkway pedestrian trail and to Roundhouse Neighborhood Park. The applicant will need to pay park dedication fees for one lot at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. At today's rate, that would be a payment of a $5.800. This fee will be deposited in the city's park and trail dedication fund for utilization on future park and trail improvements. COMPLIANCE TABLE Area (sq. ft. Width ft. Depth ft. Hard Cover % / sq.ft. Notes Code 15.000 90 125 25 / 3,750 Lot 1 20A17 79.96* 253.09 5,104 Lott 23,572 90 255.06 5,893 ROW 595 Total 44,584 1 1.024 Setbacks: 30 feet front and rear; 10 feet side *Variance: 10.04-foot lot width variance for lot 1, block 1. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Chanhassen NaRning ''e'- miss`"" 'e"^"" end that " City Council approves the preliminary and final plat for a 2 lot subdivision, and a 10.04-foot lot frontage variance for lot 1, block 1 Red Cedar Point as shown in plans dated May 15, 2018 subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the findings of fact and decision feeammexdatiee: Building: 1. Provide a 1:200 "clean" plat drawing. 2. Demolition permits required for the removal of any existing structures. 3. Buildings maybe required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 9 of 10 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 5. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 6. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services Engineering: 1. Drawing 4 —Site and Utility Plan: a) Change detail 1006 (Gate Valve and Box Installation) to detail 1005 (Water Service). b) Add City details 5202A (Bituminous Street Patching), 5203 (Curb and Gutter), 5208 (Concrete Driveway), 5209 (Bituminous Driveway), and 5221 (Tie Card). c) An abandoned watermain exists between the sanitary sewer and the watermain. Add note to make this known to the sanitary sewer and water installation contractor. 2. Drawing 5 — Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan: a) Add City details 5301 (Rock Construction Entrance) and 5302B (Erosion Control for Individual Lots) b) Provide geotechnical report. c) Include first floor elevation of buildings on adjacent lots. d) Existing and proposed elevations shall be shown at each lot comer and top of the curb at the lot line extension. e) Identify proposed soil stockpile locations. f) If importing or exporting soils for the development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 3. SAC and WAC fees due at the rate in force at time of building permit application. Environmental Resources: 1. Tree protection fencing must be properly installed at the edge of the grading limits as shown on the plans dated 5/15/18. This must be done prior to any construction activities and remain installed until all construction is completed. Any trees lost to construction activities shall be replaced. 2. No equipment or materials may be stored within the tree protection area. 3. One tree must be planted in the front of each yard, as per city requirements. Parks: 1. Park dedication fees for one lot at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 10 of 10 Planning: 1. An escrow of 110 percent of the estimated demolition costs for the demolition of the detached garage on lot 2, block 1 must be received, and the detached garage must be removed within four months of the approval of the final plat. Water Resources: 1. All permits and approvals must be received from other regulatory agencies prior to issuing permits. 2. Must show existing and proposed drainage. 3. The applicant will need to pay the surface water management (SWMP) fee for 1.010 acres at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. Should the Planning Commission City Council deny the preliminary and final plat and variance request, it is recommended that the Pjannijig Gammissieff City Council adopt the following motion and attached Finding of Fact and Decision: "The Chanhassen Beard ef,kppeals andAdjustments City Council denies the preliminary and final plat with a 10.04 lot width variance for lot 1, block 1, Red Cedar Point and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decisions." ATTACHMENTS 1) Findings of Fact (Approval) 2) Findings of Fact (Denial) 3) Application for Development Review 4) Subdivision and Final Plat Narrative 5) May 15 Variance Narrative 6) Final Plat Documents 7) Engineering memo 8) Public Hearing Notice Documents gAplan\2018 planning cases\18-10 3861 red cedar point rd subdivision & varlstaRreport red cedar point sub var_cc.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2018-10 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen City Council approves a 10.04-foot lot frontage variance for lot 1, block 1 Red Cedar Point. 2. Property. The variance is for the Red Cedar Point subdivision situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described in Exhibit A. Dated: July 9th, 2018 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA (ss COUNTY OF CARVER L" AND: CITY OF CHANHASSEN Denny Laufenburger, Mayor Todd Gerhardt, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2018 by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-I100 2 NOTARY PUBLIC Exhibit A That part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence North 89 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds East along the North line of said Section a distance of 670.0 feet; thence South 7 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 720.0 feet to the centerline of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline a distance of222.0 feet to a point distant 576.4 feet Northwesterly of the East Line of said Government Lot 1, as measured along the centerline of said Red Cedar Point Road, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract ofland to be described, and which point is also the Northeasterly comer of that tract ofland described in the first description appearing in Book 51 of Deeds, Page 884, office of the Register of Deeds, Carver County, Minnesota; thence continuing South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline of Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 197.0 feet; thence South 13 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 254.25 feet; thence North 77 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of21 1.69 feet more or less to the Easterly Line of said tract as described in said Book 51 of Deeds, page 884; thence North 16 degrees 42 minutes 50 seconds East along said Easterly Line a distance of292.17 feet more or less to the actual point of beginning and there terminating. Excepting therefrom that part taken for Red Cedar Point Road. Except all that part of the above described land lying Easterly of the West line of the tract ofland described in Certificate of Title No. 5187, Files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota, which tract ofland is described as follows: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence east on the North Line of said Section a distance of 670 feet to the center line of Glencoe Road; thence South 8 degrees 56 minutes West along the center of Glencoe Road for a distance of713.4 feet to the intersection of the center line of said Glencoe Road with the center line of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 65 degrees 56 minutes east along the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 619 feet to the initial point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 33 degrees 25 minutes west for a distance of210 feet; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes west 166.90 feet to a point; thence northeasterly on a line having a bearing of North 16 degrees 10 minutes east a distance of273.77 feet; more or less, to the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road; thence southeasterly on the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 224.17 feet, more or less, to the place of beginning, all in Carver County, State of Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part taken for said Red Cedar Point Road. DATE: MOTION BY: CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT WITH A VARIANCE CREATING RED CEDAR POINT. WHEREAS, Estate Development Corporation has requested a subdivision of the property located at 3681 Red Cedar Point Road into two single-family lots with areas of 20,417 square feet and 23,572 square feet; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision complies with all requirements of the Chanhassen City Code. WHEREAS, the Chanhassen Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 19, 2018 and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance and recommended approval of the subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby approves the final plat with a variance for Red Cedar Point, creating two lots subject to the following conditions: Building: 1. Provide a 1:200 "clean" plat drawing. 2. Demolition permits required for the removal of any existing structures. 3. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can he issued. 5. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 6. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. Engineering: 1. Drawing 4 — Site and Utility Plan: a) Change detail 1006 (Gate Valve and Box Installation) to detail 1005 (Water Service). b) Add City details 5202A (Bituminous Street Patching), 5203 (Curb and Gutter), 5208 (Concrete Driveway), 5209 (Bituminous Driveway), and 5221 (Tie Card). c) An abandoned watermain exists between the sanitary sewer and the watermain. Add note to make this known to the sanitary sewer and water installation contractor. 2. Drawing 5 — Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan: a) Add City details 5301 (Rock Construction Entrance) and 5302B (Erosion Control for Individual Lots) b) Provide geotechnical report. c) Include first floor elevation of buildings on adjacent lots. d) Existing and proposed elevations shall be shown at each lot corner and top of the curb at the lot line extension. e) Identify proposed soil stockpile locations. f) If importing or exporting soils for the development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 3. SAC and WAC fees due at the rate in force at time of building permit application. Environmental Resources: 1. Tree protection fencing must be properly installed at the edge of the grading limits as shown on the plans dated 5/15/18. This must be done prior to any construction activities and remain installed until all construction is completed. Any trees lost to construction activities shall be replaced. 2. No equipment or materials may be stored within the tree protection area. 3. One tree must be planted in the front of each yard, as per city requirements. Parks: 1. Park dedication fees for one lot at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. Planning: 1. An escrow of 110 percent of the estimated demolition costs for the demolition of the detached garage on lot 2, block 1 must be received, and the detached garage must be removed within four months of the approval of the final plat. Water Resources: 1. All permits and approvals must be received from other regulatory agencies prior to issuing permits. 2. Must show existing and proposed drainage. 3. The applicant will need to pay the surface water management (SWMP) fee for 1.010 acres at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 9' day July of 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Clerk/Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION IN RE: Application of Red Cedar Point Addition Planning Case 18-10 On June 19, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of a Preliminary Plat to Subdivide a 1.02 Acre Lot into two (2) single- family lots with a variance, Red Cedar Point. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and recommended approval of the preliminary plat and variance. On July 9, 2018, the Chanhassen City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of a Preliminary and Final Plat to Subdivide a 1.02 Acre Lot into two (2) single-family lots with a variance, Red Cedar Point and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single Family District and the zoning ordinance if the lot width variance is approved. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the comprehensive plan and subdivision ordinance. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. C. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets. 8. Variances. — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The intent of the zoning code's minimum lot width is to ensure sufficient space for a building pad that can accommodate a house and garage while meeting the district's 10-foot side yard setbacks. The proposed lot width of 79.96' is still able to accommodate the 60-foot by 60-foot building pad required by ordinance. Additionally, property has an existing house which is configured in such a way as to accommodate a home and garage within the side yard setbacks. Due to the presence and configuration of the existing home the requested variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: In order to comply with the minimum lot width stipulated in the zoning code, atypical lot configurations would be required. These configurations would result in unnecessary public right of way dedications and increased impervious surfaces within the shoreland management district. The applicants proposed lot dimensions and use for the property is reasonable and would be permitted, but for the reduced lot width on block 1, lot 1. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The existing lot was created prior to current single-family residential district zoning standards. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: Granting the variance would allow for the property to be subdivided in a manner consistent with the neighborhoods existing development pattern. Multiple properties in the vicinity do not meet the district's minimum lot width. Additionally, several of the proposed alternatives that would not require a variance would result in a subdivision with features that are atypical for this neighborhood. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 9. The planning report Planning Case 18-10, dated June 19, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters, et al, is incorporated herein. DECISION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the preliminary and final plat for a two - lot subdivision, and a 10.04-foot lot frontage variance for Lot 1, Block 1, Red Cedar Point as shown in plans dated May 15, 2018, subject to conditions of approval. ADOPTED by the City Council this 91h day of July, 2018. CITY OF CHANHASSEN LU Denny Laufenburger, Mayor g1plan\1018 planning cases\1 &10 3861 red cedar point rd subdivision & vaA findings of fact (appiuval)_a.doc CITY OF CIIANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION IN RE: Application of Red Cedar Point Addition Planning Case 18-10 On June 19, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of a Preliminary Plat to Subdivide a 1.02 Acre Lot into two (2) single- family lots with a variance, Red Cedar Point. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and recommended approval of the preliminary plat and variance. On July 9, 2018, the Chanhassen City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of a Preliminary and Final Plat to Subdivide a 1.02 Acre Lot into two (2) single-family lots with a variance, Red Cedar Point and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision as proposed does not meet the requirements of the Single -Family Residential District. A variance from the district's minimum lot widths required. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the comprehensive plan and subdivision ordinance. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Findine: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. C. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets. 8. Variances. — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The intent of the zoning code's minimum lot width is to allow for an adequately sized front yard and sufficient spacing between residential driveways. Allowing the creation of new lot that does not meet the district's minimum lot width would not be in line with the intent of the district. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The homeowner has shown multiple concept subdivisions that could comply with the district's requirements. The inability create the preferred configuration for the lots is not a practical difficulty. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The existing lot was created prior to current single-family residential district zoning standards. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: Granting the variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. £ Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 9. The planning report Planning Case 18-10, dated June 19, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters, et al, is incorporated herein. DECISION "The Chanhassen City Council denies the preliminary and final plat for a two -lot subdivision, and a 10.04-foot lot frontage variance for Lot 1, Block 1, Red Cedar Point as shown in plans dated May 15, 2018. ADOPTED by the City Council this 91 day of July, 2018. CITY OF CHANHASSEN W. Denny Laufenburger, Mayor g:Iplan12018 planning cases\I8-10 3861 red cedar point rd subdivision & var\findings of fact (denied)_cc.doc L COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone :(952)227-1300/Fax: (952)227-1110 re. CITY OF CHANHASSEN APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (/ y Submittal Date: � 0 PC Date. (a -/I I �)" O CC Date -�� 60.Day Review Date: 1I � I uSection 1: Application Type (check all that apply) (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this applicaton) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment....__................$600 23 Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers..... $100❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 El Conditional Use Permit (CUP) El Create over 3 lots ....................... $600+ $15 per lot ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots) .................................. $300 ❑ All Others ... ...................................................... $425 ❑ Consolidate Lots .............................................. $150 ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ......................................... $150 [:3 In conjunction with Single Famiy Residence.. $325 Z Final Plat..........................................................$700 ElAll Others ................................................... $425 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)' *Additional ...... escrow may he required for other applications ❑ Rezoning(REZ) through the development contract ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD................ $100 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ All Others.........................................................$500 Z Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ Administrative..................................................$100 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts*......................$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: ❑ Zoning Appeal ................................. $100 thousand square feet) 'Include number of existing employees: ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 *Include number of new employees: ElResidential Districts ..................... ............. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, Plus $5 per dwelling unit ( units nits) the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ❑� Notification Sign (City to install and remove) ................................ ........ _............ .............. $200 Z Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address ( 50 addresses) El Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)...................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation r❑ Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 dots.) ❑ Easements ( easements) ❑ Deeds TOTAL FEE: $1,600.00 Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Subdivision approval for a split of a singel parcel into 2 parcels Property Address or Location: 3861 Red Cedar Point Road, Chanhassen, MN. 55331 Parcel # 250080700 Legal Description: See Attached Total Acreage: 1.02 Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes ® No Present Zoning: Single -Family Residential District (RSF) Requested Zoning: Single -Family Residential District (RSF) Present Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Requested Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Existing Use of Property: Single family residence OCheck box if separate narrative is attached. Section 3: Property APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Estate Development Corporation Contact: Tom Gonyea Address: 15250 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 101 Phone: (612) 990-0666 City/State/Zip: Wayzata, MN. 55391 Cell: Email: tom@landmn.com Fax: o19Wly MWbyTMco a Signature: Tom Gonyea 5/14/18 DeR:M8,05.o9,]:,9:2P 5W Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the fling of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Estate Development Corporation Contact: Tom Gonyea Address 15250 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 101 Phone: (612) 990-0666 City/State/Zip: Wayzata, MN. 55391 Cell: Email: tom@landmn.com Fax: Signature: Tom Gonyea � p,�,s nmm n Date: 5/15/18 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before fling this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Alliant Engineering, Inc. Contact Mark Rausch Address: 233 Park Ave. So. Suite 300 Phone: (612) 767-9339 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN. 55415 Cell: Email: mrausch@alliant-inc.com Fax Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? `Other Contact Information: ❑ Property Owner Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑� Applicant Via: ❑� Email Z Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑� Engineer Via: ❑� Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMIT FORM PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND FINAL PLAT REQUEST SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE RED CEDAR POINT CHANHASSEN,bIINNESOTA May 15, 2018 SITE INFORMATION Legal Description: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence North 89 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds East along the North line of said Section a distance of 670.0 feet; thence South 7 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 720.0 feet to the centerline of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline a distance of 222.0 feet to a point distant 576.4 feet Northwesterly of the East Line of said Government Lot 1, as measured along the centerline of said Red Cedar Point Road, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described, and which point is also the Northeasterly comer of that tract of land described in the first description appearing in Book 51 of Deeds, Page 884, office of the Register of Deeds, Carver County, Minnesota; thence continuing South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline of Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 197.0 feet; thence South 13 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 254.25 feet; thence North 77 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 211.69 feet more or less to the Easterly Line of said tract as described in said Book 51 of Deeds, page 884; thence North 16 degrees 42 minutes 50 seconds East along said Easterly Line a distance of 292.17 feet more or less to the actual point of beginning and there terminating. Excepting therefrom that part taken for Red Cedar Point Road. Except all that part of the above descnbed land lying Easterly of the West line of the tract of land described in Certificate of Title No. 5197, Files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota, which tract of land is described as follows: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence east on the North Line of said Section a distance of 670 feet to the center line of Glencoe Road; thence South 8 degrees 56 minutes West along the center of Glencoe Road for a distance of 713.4 feet to the intersection of the center line of said Glencoe Road with the center line of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 65 degrees 56 minutes east along the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 619 feet to the initial point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 33 degrees 25 minutes west for a distance of 210 feet; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes west 166.90 feet to a point; thence northeasterly on a line having a bearing of North 16 degrees 10 minutes east a distance of 273.77 feet; more or less, to the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road; thence southeasterly on the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 224.17 feet, more or less, to the place of beginning, all in Carver County, State of Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part taken for said Red Cedar Point Road. Torrens Properly Toners Certificate No. 37556.0 Address: 3861 Red Cedar Point Road, Chanhassen, MN. 55331 PE) & Acreage: 250080700, 1.023 acres Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal May 15 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page I of 4 PRELD19NARY SUBDIVISION AND FINAL PLAT REQUEST The proposed plan consists of a low density single family residential subdivision that splits an existing parcel into 2 single family residential lots. The existing home would remain on 1 parcel and a new home would be constructed on the new lot. EXISTING SITE DESCRIPTION The development site is 1.02 acres and is bound by Red Cedar Point Road to the north and existing residential properties to the east, west and south. The property currently includes one single family residence and one accessory garage building. The existing residence has two driveway connections to Red Cedar Point Road. The property frontage abutting Red Cedar does have a 3.5' roadway easement that when added to existing dedicated right of way equates to a 50' right of way corridor along the entire property roadway frontage. The property topography has a highpoint roughly midpoint fiom the north and south lot boundary, with the north half draining northerly and the south half drains southerly. The parcel has scattered tree coverage typical of a larger residential lot. There are no wetlands on the site. Comprehensive Plan Designation The application area has a current and future Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation of Residential Low Density. The adjacent land uses are also Residential Low Density. The Residential Low Density land use guides for single family housing density of 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre and the City has typically used an average of 2 units per acres for projection of land demand. The proposed development plan has a density of 1.98 units per net acre and so is consistent with the current and future Comprehensive Guide Plan land use for the property. Zoning Classification The property has a current zoning classification of RSF — Single Family Residential District as do the surrounding properties to the east, west and south The property to the north along Red Cedar Cove is zoned PUDR — Planned Unit Development/Residential District. The existing parcel does have adequate size and dimension to allow for platting of a 2-lot subdivision compliant with RSF zoning regulations. Though the property can develop as 2 lots within RSF guidelines, a variance is proposed for one small concession to RSF zoning standards. See separate narrative for variance request. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN The applicant's intent is to create a 2-lot single family residential development that is consistent with the existing single family lots in the vicinity of the property and is considerate of market demands. Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 2 of 4 The Developer is proposing to keep the existing home on one of the new lots and build a new home on the other. The existing home would be modified by removing the existing detached tuck under garage and existing screen porch and deck. A new 2-stall attached garage will be constructed on the existing home. The new home will be a custom built home set back from Red Cedar Road similarly to the existing home. The homebuilder for the new home is not known at this time. The following is a summary of primary pr iect elements currently Wposed• Gross Acreage 1.024 acres Wetland Area 0.0 acres Red Cedar Pointe Road R/W Dedication 0.014 acres Net Buildable Acreage 1.010 acres Net Density 1.98 units per acre Proposed Proposed Lot Dimensions RSF Standard Lot 1 Lot 2 Width along R/W Frontage 90'(min.) 79.96' r 90, Width at 30' Front Setback 80.75' 90, Lot Depth 125' (min.) 253.09' 255.06' Lot Size Minimum 15,000 sf 20,417 sf 23,572 sf Setbacks: Side Setbacks 10, 10, 10, Front Setback to R/W 30' 30' 30' Rear Setback 30' 30' 30' 1. Refer to separate variance request narrative for Lot 1 lot width. Vehicular Site Access and Pedestrian Circulation The proposed development does not require construction of any new public roadway or walkways. Right of way access for vehicles and pedestrians is available to both lots via Red Cedar Point Road. Grading The only grading required will be what is necessary to: remove the existing home's garage and screen porch, construct the new garage on the existing home and build the new home. All earthmoving activities necessary for construction will require erosion and sediment control per City of Chanhassen requirements. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain The project does not require extension of any public sanitary sewer or watermain bunk lines. The existing home will continue to use the current water and sewer service from Red Cedar Point Road. The new home will require a new service connection to the available trunk sanitary sewer and watermain. Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal May 15 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 3 of 4 Stormwater Management The development is located within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; however, the City of Chanhassen and the City's Surface Water Management Plan provides governmental jurisdiction. The proposed development's size and impact area does not trigger any stormwater management requirements and thus no new stormwater treatment facilities are required. The lots are located within the Shoreland Management District and thus are limited to a maximum of 25% of impervious surface per lot. Wetlands The are no onsite wetlands. Tree Preservation The estimated baseline tree canopy coverage for the existing site is 42% of the net area (excluding perimeter right of way dedication). Per the City code, low density residential is then allowed to remove to a limit of 35% tree canopy prior to requirement of mitigation. The development plan proposes to maintain tree canopy coverage of 36% and thus no tree replacement is required per City Ordinance. Landscaping Each lot is required to install a minimum of one deciduous or conifer tree in the front yard, in accordance with the City's Subdivision Ordnance. The new tree must either be an 8' conifer or 2.5" deciduous with species chosen from the City's approved list. TIbIING/PHASING If the City approves the variance and subdivision request, it is the Applicant's desire to proceed with modifications to the existing home and placing both lots are the market. CONCLUSION The applicant respectfully concludes that this request for subdivision approval will allow for a development consistent with adjacent single family residential lots and the City Goals and Objectives for this area. Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 4 of 4 VARIANCE REQUEST SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE RED CEDAR POINT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA May 15, 2018 SITE INFORMATION Legal Description: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence North 89 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds East along the North line of said Section a distance of 670.0 feet; thence South 7 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 720.0 feet to the centerline of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline a distance of 222.0 feet to a point distant 576.4 feet Northwesterly of the East Line of said Government Lot 1, as measured along the centerline of said Red Cedar Point Road, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described, and which point is also the Northeasterly comer of that had of land described in the first description appearing in Book 51 of Deeds, Page 884, office of the Register of Deeds, Carver County, Minnesota; thence continuing South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline of Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 197.0 feet; thence South 13 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 254.25 feet; thence North 77 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 211.69 feet more or less to the Easterly Line of said tract as described in said Book 51 of Deeds, page 884; thence North 16 degrees 42 minutes 50 seconds East along said Easterly Line a distance of 292.17 feet more or less to the actual point of beginning and there terminating. Excepting therefrom that part taken for Red Cedar Point Road. Except all that part of the above described land lying Easterly of the West line of the tract of land described in Certificate of Title No. 5187, Files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota, which tract of land is described as follows: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence east on the North Line of said Section a distance of 670 feet to the center line of Glencoe Road; thence South 8 degrees 56 minutes West along the center of Glencoe Road for a distance of 713.4 feet to the intersection of the center line of said Glencoe Road with the center fine of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 65 degrees 56 minutes east along the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 619 feet to the initial point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 33 degrees 25 minutes west for a distance of 210 feet; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes west 166.90 feet to a point; thence northeasterly on a line having a bearing of North 16 degrees 10 minutes east a distance of 273.77 feet; more or less, to the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road; thence southeasterly on the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 224.17 feet, more or less, to the place of beginning, all in Carver County, State of Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part taken for said Red Cedar Point Road. Torrens Property Torrens Certificate No. 37556.0 Address: 3861 Red Cedar Point Road, Chanhassen, MN. 55331 PID & Acreage: 250080700, 1.023 acres Variance Request May 15 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 1 of 3 DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUEST The proposed request for variance from City Code is for permission to allow for a proposed subdivision that includes I single family residential lot with a minimum lot right of way frontage of 79.96 feet. The City's Zoning Ordinance for RSF — Single Family Residential identifies a minimum lot frontage width of 90' for standard lots. Design Alternatives The applicant has explored site design alternatives to investigate if there is an option that would not require a variance to subdivide the existing parcel into 2 lots. A total of 3 alternative were developed, see attached concept plans and following descriptions: Concept A: Site option would expand/dedicate additional right of way along Red Cedar Point Road. The additional right of way would be provided with an arc into the project resulting in 90 lineal feet of right of way frontage each lot. Both lots would meet all criteria for RSF zoning standards. Concept B: Site option would expand/dedicate additional right of way along Red Cedar Point Road. The additional right of way would be provided in an `eyebrow' shape similar to a cul-de-sac bulb. The resultant lot configuration would result in 90+ lineal feet of frontage for each lot and the lots would have 90 feet in width at the 30' front setback. Both lots would meet all criteria for RSF zoning standards. Concept C: Site option uses the City zoning code definition of flag lot to define 2 new parcels. As conceptualized the existing home would be situated in a flag lot that is designed with a 100' width at the flag start including a 30' setback to the existing home. The second lot would meet the 90, right of way frontage and 90' lot width at the front setback. Both lots would meet all criteria for RSF zoning standards. Alternate Summary Concepts A, B and C show that there are RSF zoning code compliant alternatives to the submitted plan but they would result in less desirable plat options for the City and Applicant. The additional dedication of public right of way in Concept A and B would result in a reduction the taxable land for the City of Chanhassen and lower development fee receipt The additional right of way either in arch or bulb shape would create the right of way frontage length and minimum lot width at the front setback that the City identifies in the City Code but serve no infrastructure purpose. Concept C does provides a RSF code compliant flag lot line configuration but the plan creates unconventional lots that could present coordination issues between the future lot owners. Preferred Option Summary The proposed variance request plan does contain one lot (new home) that will meet all RSF zoning criteria. The other lot with the existing home would need a variance for reduced lot width but it Variance Request May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 2 of 3 would still maintain a width of 80 lineal feet right of way frontage and be 80+ feet in width at the 30' front setback. Both lots would meet or exceed the desired 60' wide x 60' deep building pads or buildable area. The proposed variance would result in lots that do not require additional right of way dedication, and provides a new lot line that is parallel to the existing west parcel boundary creating a typical lot line that is clearly defined for future owners. VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION Check to City findings for granting a variance (pursuant to City Code Section 20-58): a) The requested variance results in a subdivision that would be in harmony with RSF zoning standards. Non -typical design alternatives do exist to technically create an RSF zoning complaint plan, however, they would have other detriments that are less beneficial to the City nor are as marketable for future lot/home owners. The variance request creates a subdivision that is consistent with the surrounding residential properties, of which, some are smaller than 90' wide themselves, including the property directly abutting the development site to the west. The variance request creates a plan that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and results in a land use density just under the City's estimate average demand within low density residential land use. b) The variance is not being requested for the property owner to use the property in a manner not permitted by RSF zoning standards. The proposed subdivision plan and requested variance is in substantial conformance to RSF zoning with one minor exception. c) The variance is not being requested for economic considerations alone. The variance is being requested to avoid unnecessary dedication of public right of way and to allow creation of lots with typical configuration reducing chance of conflict between future lot owners. d) The plight of the current landowner is due to the parcel being subdivided to its width prior to current RSF zoning standards and not at any fault of the landowner. There are existing lots near the proposed subdivision that also do not meet RSF zoning standards for lot width and thus the proposed variance request is reasonable. e) The variance if granted will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed variance plan will result in a subdivision that is consistent with the existing neighborhood. f) The variance is not being requested for earth sheltered construction. The applicant respectfully concludes that the request for variance and subdivision will allow for a development consistent with adjacent single family residential lots and the City Goals and Objectives for this area. Variance Request May 15 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 3 of 3 ti b � y t, I G9 51 / I T ^F 1 9 u 20 ?O BO h SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT DEVELOPED USING COUNTY GIS AND LiDAR TOPOGRAPHY M� RED CEDAR POINT ROAD PROPERTY "Ns11E`°"°° V0 293 P.x Are S. srM moae�xc ,n,rn BOUNDARY AND TOPO W/ LOT SPLIT CONCEPT B "R/W BULB" W"MPOVA MN6 15 e12'/5&sm Min t; �"' CHANHASSEN, MN e1zJW,3 FM ow+wre rav wxw.elfierV-inc.cpn Al C, 20 40 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT DEVELOPED USING COUNTY GIS AND LiDAR TOPOGRAPHY RED CEDAR POINT • rw.ww....r.r.r YSNM1.ww\•... s.wS—.nr '•.ray.arrw..wnrr� ,•.,�•Mr�� M� ti F 4 .w�.wnrr..r..�w•.M.rw �ir•�Y yi w=�•wY� w.wriw.rnnr. [��.,..xn.�..i./..as .w..nnwrw�� h.w.s..w�.w�.•r ww�µ� .Ynwr�w..rYv.wr...>�. �iwww......•,..wsrrr —�L uw•w•�.�w.sww.r..wwwn.u.•wr._wr. ww.we.wrrY.� i•i �w..w...w.�wlr• �Iwwww �ww �`•i AT•ww`•CY �x•.w w�`iw� wYwS•Ya•wwwwww•�YY rw_w.�L w.ww��.wY...wn. ww.s�nw.wr.w� rw•r..—YFrY.Y 4Y4.Yw•.� ..rv'wYwY.w �L ..••.,www•..wrw�ww.wY�Y. •i nMw� Y �Y�r.�t�w�.•w�,. w.�,Y4 R.t = L gftt-Ilm( �t TN,tS/M� f1NV T/1 DeVeloDmerlt Rev ey Checklist Last Revision: -L 10-18-17 Grading Plan (Section 18-40 18-60)• �;;d 7c- / .0 Topographic data within the property to be subdivided and 100' beyond the property boundary 7i ► An accurate soils report indicating soil conditions, permeability and slope f ¢ Location of wetlands rk7. � e'� , iA proposed grading plan shown at contour intervals appropriate to the topography or spot elevations �T (usually 2' CI) %,a150 scale or larger Show benchmark location and elevation ► First floor elevation of buildings on adjacent lots. Vacant lots shall be labeled as suche-- ryo r C'7 Locations of all easements of record -e v e: s v e�✓ I t/ ► Existing and proposed elevations at the following locations ► --each lot corner(!) rr ► -top of curb or centerline of roadway at each lot line extension - rk4- C�... &,4J Vill"-center of proposed driveway at curb (important for questionable driveways) ► --grade at corners of proposed structure 4--- Al-' l ► -lowest floor level, top of bioce and garage slab (1) Vindication of direction of surface water drainage by arrows Driveway grade (10% Max) ► Lowest floor elevation must be minimum 3' above the highest known groundwater elevation and must meet the requirements set for the in 20481(e)(1) < 4fVi GA/ ek4' f an EOF route is adjacent to the property the lowest building opening shall be minimum 1' Yove the EtOF elevation r- rf/A �i /�� < W` v�5yle of home-* n� ► Standard lot benching detail f WL -' -�( Drain tile service must be provided for all properties where runoff will flow from the back to the front f the lots r✓ f' i. CW-Y ► Identify proposed soil stockpile areas V>-t�.ots shall be graded to drain away from building locations §18-60 yProposed grades shall be <3:1 Proposed house sizes shall be shown on the subdivision plan and shall include decks and patios, the driveway and sidewalks to building entrances. If house plans are not known, then a 60 foot by 60 foot ► building pad and a 30-foot wide access driveway shall be used. The maximum permitted impervious surface shall be calculated for each lot and the permitted houses and structures shall be limited to those sizes. §18-60 1 �� jJ �j MtCF Retaining walls (Section 18-40)•, ► All proposed retaining walls must be shown on the plan ► Top and bottom of retaining wall elevations shown on the plan ► If over 6' high and within 10' of any public way (sidewalk, trail, street, alley, etc), shall have a fence or other barrier (eg. Berm or landscaping) ► Landscaping between retaining walls should be low or no maintenance ► The following materials are prohibited: smooth face, poured in place concrete (stamped or patterned is OK), masonry, railroad ties and timber ► Boulder walls cannot be taller than 6ft in height ► Maintenance and repair of retaining walls that cross lot lines and are built in conjunction with the subdivision shall be owned and maintained by the HOA Page 1 of 3 Development Review Checklist Last Revision: 10-18-17 Utility Plan (Section 1"): Location, size and approximate grade of proposed public sewer and watermains4-- i 4 Utilities (public and private) on or adjacent to the property, including location, size and IE *Hydrants spaced 300' for residential, 600' for rural and at each Intersection for cuWe-sacs*-- HIA v� Watermain is constructed 7.5' below grade (or insulated) _ cEr%/% ^5 Materials: Clow Medallion or Mueller Super Centurion hydrants per standard/ detail plate,k-- slit Materials: watermain and san sewer are PVC, watermain is C900 ,* ' A114 "A) %,y5an sewer cover must be >7.5' - 6' deep without insulation VIK'San sewer connection grades at low points must be>1/4":1' 4-- A• 044k goof Drainage and Utility easements must be large enough for excavation and maintenance. OSHA regs call' for a 1':1.5' excavation. %,*Easements shall be wide enough for utility excavation at 1:1.5 (preferred), or 1:1(min) �v► Check that utility crossings do not conflict - Dc of JDrwra WAL �t�wlsn S w✓ SGry �N� Streets (Sections 18-40,18-57): ► Layout of proposed streets showing the proposed names the ROW widths, centerline gradients an ,/ typical cross -sections. 'e, JL/� G4 ► Location and with of proposed trails and sidewalks A!/.• (,tom !� ► Easement provided for trails to be owned/maintained by the City a 5 N1trs� Fences and berms shall be no closer than 18" from a sidewalk or trail ROW and street widths per the table found in 18-57 (b) atreets intersect at 90 degrees when practicable. Intersection angles less than 60 degrees are not llowed Intersections having more than 4 corners are prohibited A minimum 300'tangent is required between reverse curves on arterial and collector streets *Centerline grade for arterial streets must be between 0.5%and 5% centerline grade for local streets must be between 0.5%and 7% ocal street intersections must be offset by at least 300' Street alignments shall discourage through traffic Radius of 300' for collector roads, 500' for arterials and 100' for other roadways If radius is less than 300', superelevation or speed limit signage is required Maximum Cul-de-sac length is 800' Lighting type approved by City at intersections and other locations §18-78 XSide lines of lots shall be substantially at right angles to straight street lines or substantially radial to curved street lines. §18-60 )iCTemporary cull -de -sac must be constructed at all locations where a street stub will be constructed and will be extended in the future. The developer must submit an escrow for the cost of removing the temporary cul-de-sac and vacating the easement (if applicable). §18-57 Page 2 of 3 Development Review Checklist Last Revision: 10-18-17 Sidewalk and Trails - Chan Standard Details, MnDOT BFDM: ► Trails -10' wide, Sidewalk 5' wide (Chan Stnd Plates) ► 100' desired (90' min) radius for trails (Design Speed = 20mph) lr ► Boulevard min 5', other - use RDM 0 �0foot wide ped ramp and connections to trail for maintenance equipment access \(3' horizontal clearance (signage, lamp post, fixed barrier), 10"-20" from railing, 20" min (retaining wall, J-barrier) Driveways (Sections 18-60, 20-1101 20-1122)• ► Grades shall be between 0.5%and 10% ► Within the MUSA must be hard surface leg bituminous, concrete) i ► Minimum width = 10' Maximum width at ROW = 36' (24' for RR RSF R-4, RLM, A2, PUD-R) 's."aximum width within the lot = 50' Side yard setback = 10' - Important for flag lotsl Drive Thrus (Section 20-963): ► Stacking for fast food: 6 cars/aisle ► Stacking for banks: 3 cars/aisle ► Stacking for pharmacy: 2 cars/aisle ► Stacking for other uses: 2 cars/aisle ► Stacking areas shall not interfere with vehicular circulation in the parking lot, nor encroach into any required drive aisles nr to Parking drive aisle widths minimum/maximum (Section 20-1101): I�► 1^ ► Parking lots (Section 20-1118): ► For 90 degree parking stalls, width = 9', depth = 18', drive aisle _ 26' ► Dead end aisles require a 10' x 26'turnaround Plat (Sections 18-401: V ► Location and width of proposed utility easements Page 3 of 3 Work Flow Table for Developments Developer: Submits Application Submits Final Plans Schedule's Pre -Con Submits all documents Plat and Easements and Preliminary or Meeting, for signature and filing are Registered with Final Plans Submits Updated with the county the County Plans Engineering Dept: . Staff Report • Updates Staff Report • Distribute Plans to • Check that all necessary • List of Met/Un-met the Inspector documents are in per - Conditions of Approval • Helps pick the pre- Conditions of Approval • Development Contract con date (at least • May have pre -con (send to developer ASAP one week after meeting in 2 days so they can sort out the receiving plans) • Can approve grading fees and LOC) • Remind developer permit that all documents, • Send packet to the City fees and LOC must Attorney (see checklist) be in 2 days prior Approval Determined By: Planning Committee City Council Meeting City Attorneys Office Meeting After Approval: • Touch base with • Send documents to the • Developer can developer's City Attorney as soon as now sell lots of engineer to make they are received (staff record sure he report, DC, title work, understands the easements, HOA, ect.) Conditions of • Send the Developer a Approval checklist of items that must be turned in 2 days BEFORE a pre -con meeting can be held. — NOTES: (1) The contractor MUST NOT begin construction work until the documents are approved by the City Attorney and are at the County Registrar's Office to be filed. (2) From: Susan Moe <scmillion(@vahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, June 17, 20181:31 PM To: Walters, MacKenzie <MWalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: 3861 Red Cedar Point Road Subdivision and Variance Request Dear Ms, Walters, I live on the west boundary of the property that is proposed for subdivision. I have read the materials on the City's website and reviewed the plot plans and survey. As a resident of a neighborhood with large lots I am concerned that this could set a precedent for dividing other lots if the city is not planning to stick with the minimum lot widths. I also expect the City to enforce all setbacks for the new home and other buildings and also enforce the tree protection ordinance. Lastly, there have several recent building projects in the Minnewashta Pkwy area where substantial quantities of soil have washed onto city streets and into the storm sewer and nearby lakes and wetlands due to poor enforcement of the erosion control regulations. The silt fences and other systems have been poorly installed and then not maintained until the property has been re - vegetated. Thank you, Susan Moe 952 474-2236 7161 Minnewashta Pkwy Excelsior. MN 55331 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JUNE 19, 2018 Chairman Aller catled the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Steve Weick, Nancy Madsen, John Tietz, and Mark Randall MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad and Michael McGonagill STAFF PRESENT: Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner; MacKenzie Walters, Planner; and George Bender, Assistant City Engineer PG PUBLIC HEARING: NO 3861 RED CEDAR POINT ROAD: SUBDIVISION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH a 0 VARIANCE. Walters: Thank you very much. This is Planning Case 2018-10. It's a subdivision with a lot width variance for 3861 Red Cedar Point Road. The applicant is requesting a 10.04 foot lot frontage variance for Lot 1, Block 1 in this proposed 2 lot subdivision. Thank you and Sharmeen has pointed I need to get it off our holding screen. Thank you for that. Right here you can see the proposed, the location for the subdivision. This is a little over an acre parcel in the Red Cedar Point neighborhood. The parcel is zoned residential single family. There's a section of property zoned planned unit development residential to the north. With regards to the preliminary plat the minimum lot area required for residential single family zoning is 15,000 square feet. The proposed area for Lot 1, Block 1 is 20,417 and for Lot 2, Block 1 is 23,572. The proposed lot width for Lot I is 79.96 feet which would require a variance from the 90 foot standard. Lot 2 would meet that standard and both properties significantly exceed the 125 foot minimum depth. There are two other kind of miscellaneous code provisions that pertain to this case. The city code does not allow for the presence of an accessory use without a primary use so you can't have a garage without a house on a lot and it does not allow for a single family dwelling without a 2 car garage. So in order to avoid creating a non -conformity with this subdivision the applicant will need to remove the existing garage and then construct a 2 car garage to serve the existing house which they're proposing to retain. One of the other things we look at in a preliminary plat subdivision request is whether or not it meets the City's tree preservation ordinance. The tree preservation ordinance requires a minimum canopy coverage of 35 percent. The property currently has 42 percent canopy coverage. The applicant is proposing to remove the trees here but has submitted lot cover calculations showing that the property would still have 36 percent so it meets that ordinance. They would be required to install one tree in the front yard if none are present under ordinance as well. The other thing we look at is whether or not they have access to park infrastructure. In this case the proposed subdivision would be served by both Roundhouse Park to the northwest and the Minnewashta park pedestrian trail Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 19, 2018 which is in green. In terms of utilities and access, the property has access off of Red Cedar Point Road so no new street would need to be constructed and it is served by city water and sewer. The existing house would continue to use it's existing connections and the new house would need to tie into those lines. In terms of right-of-way streets and easements, the property has an existing 595 square foot easement for Red Cedar Point. The applicant will be dedicating 10 foot front and 5 foot side and rear drainage and utility easements. The City is not requesting the dedication of any existing right-of-way. As the report mentions Red Cedar Point Road is substandard with 50 feet of right-of-way instead of the traditionally, instead of the currently required 60. However because there is no opportunity for the other properties on the southeast to subdivide and there's no way the City will ever be able to get that additional right-of-way we're not going to be asking for any additional right-of-way at this time because we couldn't find a way to widen the road. In terms of the requested variance, they are requesting a 10.04 foot front lot line width variance for Lot 1, Block 1. The justification is this is a pretty straight forward subdivision. If the applicant conducted a partial cul-de-sac configuration and they presented two they would be able to meet the requirements of the subdivision ordinance without needing the variance. They would have 90 feet front lot width. Because this property is located within the shoreland overlay district for both Lake St. Joe and Lake Minnewashta staff feels it's important to do everything possible to minimize the creation of extra impervious surface and by granting this 10 foot variance staff estimated it would save about 1,500 to 2,000 square feet of impervious surface that'd be required to create the cul-de-sac and meet the subdivision requirements. The other alternative is a flat lot which would in itself require a variance from the city's subdivision ordinance and also create lot lines that can cause issues down the road for future property owners. The proposed variance does still leave room for a 60 by 60 building pad and can accommodate the house and 2 car garage so it would be able to meet all current setbacks and looking through both properties within the 500 foot notification area and the neighborhood at large, there are numerous properties that do not meet the 90 foot lot width so it is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. Staff did receive some comments and concerns from some of the neighbors. One of the concerns that was brought up was concern about establishing a precedent of not meeting lot width. Because lot width in this case could be met through the use of the eyebrow or partial cul-de-sac allowing the property to be subdivided without a variance we don't believe this establishes a precedent that we're not going to require properties to meet the lot width to be subdivided. With regards to future issues with setbacks, the parcel is able to meet the required side, front and rear setbacks. The applicant is not requesting a setback variance and staff would not recommend approval of any that were requested subsequently. The lot can accommodate a 60 by 60 building pad. It does meet the tree preservation ordinance requirements. If any trees are lost during construction they would need to be replaced. There have been some historic issues with erosion control in the neighborhood. Engineering and building will monitor those throughout the construction and have been made aware of that. Looking over the proposal for the variance and subdivision staff, as I kind of went through all these so I won't go into too much detail but we do feel the variance is in keeping with the neighborhood. There are other properties including one adjacent to the west that have similar lot widths of around 80 feet. The subdivision can go forward without a variance with the use of a partial cul-de-sac and staff believes that minimizing impervious surface in the shoreland is of 2 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 19, 2018 greater importance than the 90 foot minimum lot width. And both lots are well in excess of the minimum lot area with over 20,000 square feet compared to the required 15,000. The subdivision meets all the requirements of city code and for that reason staff is recommending approval of preliminary plat with the variance. I'd be happy to take any questions at this time. Alter: Thank you. Does anybody have questions of staff? Seeing none we'll have the, oh Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: MacKenzie I see that it says that they can build that partial cul-de-sac without any kind of variance so any development could just put a partial cul-de-sac on their lot off any road? Walters: Not necessarily. In this case they can do it and meet the 90 foot but yeah they could choose to dedicate the extra right-of-way to the City in order to meet that frontage. Madsen: And there's no rules about having several partial cul-de-sacs on a road if various lots wanted to subdivide? Walters: I'll defer to Sharmeen. She's a little more familiar with that aspect of the ordinance. Al-Jaff: If you look at areas along Lake Lucy Road, that would be a perfect example. We have a few eyebrows that we look at the situation. Can they put a full pledged cul-de-sac? Does it make sense for them to put a full pledged cul-de-sac and if the answer is no, then we will allow an eyebrow. In this case they would be able to put in the entire bubble of a cul-de-sac. The way the ordinance reads is if that road is not going to go anywhere, let's assume that there is a wetland further down, which is the case with this one, then they would be able to put a bubble for a cul-de-sac and would be able to meet the ordinance requirements by doing it. Madsen: Okay thank you. AI-Jaff: Sure. Alter: Any additional questions of staff? Okay we'll have the applicant come forward and make a presentation should they decide to do so. Welcome sir. Tom Gonyea: Good evening Mr. Chair, members of the commission. Tom Gonyea representing Estate Development Corporation, 15250 Wayzata Boulevard in Minnetonka. You know I think MacKenzie went over the matter pretty well. 1 really don't have too much to add to it. 1 think it's going to be a nice addition to the area. The existing house that's there is actually a nice house. The garage could use a little help so the proposal is to take the garage down and that's going to sit on the proposed new lot but the house itself is actually in very good condition inside and out and adding a 2 car garage on should enhance the value of that quite a bit I guess so anyways if there's any questions of council or staff. 3 Chanhassen Planning Commission —June 19, 2018 Aller: Can you tell me how you come to the decision to subdivide as opposed to use an eyebrow or what did you use in making that decision? What were you looking at? Tom Gonyea: You know I guess we looked at it a few different ways. We looked at the flag lot option. There's a potential to do that within the ordinance. We didn't pursue it that much. And then we looked at the eyebrow and we came to the conclusion that it probably wasn't worth adding the road. It was within the shoreland district and that was actually brought up you know between my engineer and Sharmeen are the ones that looked to that and it just kind of doesn't need it. If you look at some of the other properties in the area it seems to work pretty well with the smaller lot width as it stands so I guess you know I felt it was probably a better way to do it. You're not adding infrastructure. It's less disruptive and it should provide a nice building pad for a nice house. Aller: Thank you. Any additional questions for the applicant? Tietz: Yeah just a question. Allen. Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: It looks like the, it says sample building. It looks like it's more than a sample buildout. Is that a proposed house? It seems to just max the site. You really property line to property line is built within, is that what's going to be proposed? Tom Gonyea: Mr. Chair, members of the commission. That's truly proposed. I don't have a house plan in mind at all. I haven't selected a builder to build it. What they come up with for a final design certainly will meet the requirements but that is not representative of what will be built there. Tietz: Okay. Aller: Any additional questions? Thank you sir. Tom Gonyea: Thank you. Aller: Okay we'll open up the public hearing portion of this item. Any individual wishing to speak either for or against the item can do so at this time. Seeing no one come forward we'll close the public hearing portion of the item and open it up for commissioner comments. And potential action. I'll start off by saying I think it's great that it is being considered and that you have a homeowner and their representatives that come in and work with the City on a solution that is a better solution than one they can do anyway and on that fact alone I would almost give you the nod but it does fulfill all the other requirements for a variance in that it's the nature of the piece of property itself and it's a reasonable use of the property and the other items that we would be looking at but I certainly agree with the minimizing of the impervious surfaces that 4 Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 19, 2018 would be used and the benefits to the shoreland management districts that were considered that it tips me in favor of approval and I'll be voting that way so. Any additional comments? Concerns. Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Just a, well just a observation. Obviously they want to maximize the lot for sale with new construction but it, the plans presented here limits any really further construction on, adjacent to the existing house. That 2 car garage kind of mazes out side to side you know lot setbacks so obviously they wanted to max the for sale site but you could have had 90 feet for the existing home and a reduced lot for the for sale site. And they still would have met all the standards. Just a comment. Weick: They still would have needed a variance right? Tietz: Yeah either way. Weick: You're just saying switching. Tietz: It's just flipping the 90 foot. Weick: I gotch ya, yeah. Aller: I guess I look at it that it should be presumed that a homeowner's going to try to maximize the value of their property and maximize the space used so whatever is put on there we have representation in the city and they would have to come before us if they wanted a variance or to alter those setbacks when they're in use and it sounds like most likely this board as established and the staff would not look favorably on that kind of request so. Any additional comments? Hearing none I'll entertain a motion. Tietz: I'll read it. Aller. Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the preliminary plat for a two lot subdivision and a 10.04 foot lot frontage variance for Lot 1, Block 1, Red Cedar Point as shown on the plans dated May 15, 2018 subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Madsen: Second. Aller. Having a valid motion by Commissioner Tietz and a second by Commissioner Madsen, any further discussion? Chanhassen Planning Commission —June 19, 2018 Tietz moved, Madsen seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the preliminary plat for a two lot subdivision and a 10.04 foot lot frontage variance for Lot 1, Block 1, Red Cedar Point as shown on the plans dated May 15, 2018 subject to the following conditions of approval and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Building: 1. Provide a 1:200 "clean" plat drawing. 2. Demolition permits required for the removal of any existing structures. 3. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 5. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 6. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. Engineering: 1. Drawing 4 — Site and Utility Plan: a) Change detail 1006 (Gate Valve and Box Installation) to detail 1005 (Water Service). b) Add City details 5202A (Bituminous Street Patching), 5203 (Curb and Gutter), 5208 (Concrete Driveway), 5209 (Bituminous Driveway), and 5221 (Tie Card). c) An abandoned watermain exists between the sanitary sewer and the watermain. Add note to make this known to the sanitary sewer and water installation contractor. 2. Drawing 5 — Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan: a) Add City details 5301 (Rock Construction Entrance) and 5302B (Erosion Control for Individual Lots) b) Provide geotechnical report. c) Include first floor elevation of buildings on adjacent lots. d) Existing and proposed elevations shall be shown at each lot corner and top of the curb at the lot line extension. e) Identify proposed soil stockpile locations. f) If importing or exporting soils for the development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 3. SAC and WAC fees due at the rate in force at time of building permit application. Environmental Resources: Chanhassen Planning Commission — June 19, 2018 1. Tree protection fencing must be properly installed at the edge of the grading limits as shown on the plans dated 5/15/18. This must be done prior to any construction activities and remain installed until all constriction is completed. Any trees lost to construction activities shall be replaced. 2. No equipment or materials may be stored within the tree protection area. 3. One tree must be planted in the front of each yard, as per city requirements. Parks: 1. Park dedication fees for one lot at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. Planning: 1. An escrow of 110 percent of the estimated demolition costs for the demolition of the detached garage on lot 2, block 1 must be received, and the detached garage must be removed within four months of the approval of the final plat. Water Resources: 1. All permits and approvals must be received from other regulatory agencies prior to issuing permits. 2. Must show existing and proposed drainage. 3. The applicant will need to pay the surface water management (SWMP) fee for 1.010 acres at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Alter: The motion carries and then I would just tack on a little recommendation that a notation be made of the community's request that we keep an eye on the silt fences and there's a history in that area of having problems and it seems like the plan itself is doing a lot to protect the surface area and the surface water management and we should be doing our best to enforce those requirements as we are imposing them on the construction sites. Tom Gonyea: Thank you. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Weick noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated June 5, 2018 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. y � ANH ASS PROPOSED MOTION: PC DATE: June 19, 2018 CC DATE: July 9, 2016 REVIEW DEADLINE: September 18, 2018 CASE #: 2018-10 BY: MW, SJ, VS "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the preliminary plat for a 2 lot subdivision, and a 10.04-foot lot frontage variance for lot 1, block 1 Red Cedar Point as shown in plans dated May 15, 2018 subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the findings of fact and recommendation" (Note: A motion for denial and appropriate findings of fact are also included at the end of the report.) SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Preliminary plat with variance for a 2 lot single-family residential subdivision. LOCATION: 3861 Red Cedar Point Road OWNERAND APPLICANT: Estate Development Corporation . Tom Gonyea 15250 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 101 Wayzata, MN 55391 PRESENT ZONING: Single Family Residential District, RSF 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density ACREAGE: Gross: 1.024 acres Net: 1.010 DENSITY: Gross: 1.95 units/ac Net: 1.98 units/ac LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAIQNNG: The city's discretion in approving or denying a Preliminary Plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The city's discretion in approving or denying a Variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the zoning code for a variance. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 2of10 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is proposing to subdivide the existing lot to create 2 lots for a single-family detached housing. The applicant will demolish the existing detached garage and construct a new two car attached garage for the existing home, which will be retained. The applicant will request that the City Council concurrently approve the preliminary and final plat. The applicant is also requesting a variance from the Single Family Residential District's required 90-foot minimum lot width. The applicant could meet the required 90-foot lot width for both lots through the use of a half -cul-de-sac ("eyebrow'); however, this would result in increased lot coverage. Access to the site provided by Red Cedar Point Road. Sewer and water are available to the site. Staff is recommending approval of the request. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3., "Variances" Chapter 20, Article VII, Zoning and water supply/sanitary provisions Chapter 20, Article XII, "RSF" Single Family Residential District Chapter 20, Article XIII, Division 1, Sec. 20-904 "Accessory Structures" Chapter 20, Article XIII, Division 1, Sec. 20-905 "Single-family dwellings" Site Constraints The existing house was built in 1957, a detached garage is also present near the center of the property. Staff was unable to determine the construction date of the garage. The high point on the property is near the existing house with an elevation of 972. The low point on the property is southwest comer with an elevation of 954. The existing lot has 169.86 feet of frontage along Red Cedar Point Road and 44,584 square feet of lot area. The site has a net canopy coverage of 42 percent. This site is located within Lake Minnewasma and Lake St. Joe's shoreland management districts. Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 3 of 10 No wetlands are present on the site. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This area has land use classification of Residential Low Density in the city's 2030 Comprehensive Plan. This classification requires net densities of between 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre. The applicant's proposal has a net density of 1.98 units/acre which is consistent with the area's land use plan. ZONING ORDINANCE The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) District, and the applicant is not requesting a change to the parcel's zoning. The proposed subdivision would require a variance from the zoning ordinance's minimum lot width. VARIANCE The applicant's proposed lot 1, block 1 would have a width of 79.96 feet, which is 10.04 feet less than the 90 feet required by sec. 20-615 and sec. 20480 for properties zoned RSF within the shoreland management district. The applicant has demonstrated that the subdivision could meet the requirements of sec. 20-615 and sec. 20480 either through the use of a flag lot (Concept C), which would require a variance from the city's subdivision ordinance, or through the dedication of additional public right of way to create a partial cul-de-sac (Concepts A and B). Concept B Concept A Concept C Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 4 of 10 The intent of the zoning code's minimum yard width requirement is to ensure that lots can accommodate a house and garage while meeting the districts 10-foot side yard setbacks. The applicant is proposing retaining the existing home on lot 1, block 1 and has conceptually shown that a two car garage can be added to the existing home while meeting the required 10-foot side yard setbacks. Proposed Layout The area around Red Cedar Point is one of the oldest in the city and it has many atypical lot configurations. The majority of properties within 500 feet of the applicant's do meet the required minimum lot width; however, an adjacent property does have an estimated 80 feet of lot frontage. Outside of the 500-foot public notification area, though still within the general neighborhood, are numerous properties along Red Cedar Point road, South Cedar Drive, and Hickory Road that have lot widths significantly below what the applicant is proposing. A property with an approximately 80-foot lot width would not be out of character for the neighborhood. The proposed lot configuration, though it does not meet the district's minimum standards, would be more in keeping with the neighborhood's character than either a flag lot or a partial cul-de-sac solution. All of the proposed alternative configurations have significant drawbacks. in the case of concept C, the flag lot would create awkward lot lines that could cause conflict between future homeowners and a more staggered house setback from Red Cedar Point Road. The applicant would also need to apply for and receive a variance from the city's subdivision ordinance in order to create the flag lot. For concepts A and B, the partial cul-de-sac would require the dedication of additional right of way to the city and the installation of additional impervious surface within that right of way. Staff estimates that concepts A and B would lead to the creation of between approximately 1,500 and 2,200 square feet of additional impervious surface. Since the property is located within Lake Minnewashsta and Lake St. Joe's shoreland management district and no new stormwater management improvements are being proposed as part of this subdivision, staff believes it is important to take all possible steps to minimize the amount of new impervious surface generated by this subdivision. Water Resource and Planning staff believe that the shoreland management district's goal of limiting the amount of impervious surface near water resources is of greater importance than the shoreland management district's 90-foot minimum lot width. Since the requested variance will prevent the creation of additional and unnecessary impervious surface within the shoreland management district and will result in more conventional lot configuration that is broadly in keeping with the overall aesthetics of the neighborhood, staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant the requested variance. Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19,2018 Page 5 of 10 PRELIMINARY PLAT RFC cRIqR r RO Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 6of10 Existing Home The applicant is proposing to retain the existing home which is located on the eastern side of the property on what will become lot 1, block 1. This home is currently being served by a detached garage located in the center of the property on what will become lot 2, block 1. Section 20-905 requires that all single-family dwellings be provided with at least a two -car garage, and Section 20-904 does not permit accessory structures without the permitted principal structure. The applicant is proposing demolishing the existing detached garage and constructing a new attached garage on lot 1, block 1 in order to comply with city code. Staff is recommending requiring an escrow to ensure that the garage on lot 2, block 1 is removed. The applicant will be required to provide a cost estimate for the removal of the structure and an escrow in the amount of 110 percent of the demolition cost estimate. GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL No grading is required beyond what will be associated with demolishing the existing detached garage and screen porch, and constructing the new attached garage and new home. Erosion and sediment control will need to meet the city's requirements. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The proposed development should be designed to meet the city's water quality and water quantity requirements. The proposed development will need to receive any and all required permits and meet the requirements of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The applicant will need to pay the surface water management (SWMP) fee for 1.010 acres at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. At today's rate, that would be a payment of $8,160.80. RIGHT-OF-WAY, STREETS AND EASEMENTS The survey included all easements and right of way shown on the title search of the property dated April 15, 2018 from Stewart Title Guarantee Company. STREETS, DRIVEWAYS & SIDEWALK No new public roadways or walkways are required. Red Cedar Point Road provides right-of-way access to both proposed lots. The property has a 3.5-foot roadway easement that when added to the existing dedicated right of way provides a 50-foot right-of-way corridor for Red Cedar Point Road. While this does not meet the city's current 60-foot right-of-way requirements, numerous roads in this area have a non -conforming 50-feet of dedicated right-of-way and the city does not believe it will be possible to acquire additional right-of-way from the other properties south of Red Cedar Point Rd. For these reasons, the city is not requiring the dedication of additional Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 7 of 10 public right-of-way. This will allow the right-of-way to remain consistent with the surrounding area. EASEMENTS The applicant is dedicating 5-foot side and rear, and 10-foot front lot line drainage and utility easements. Drainage and utility easements should be provided as illustrated in the preliminary plat dated May 15, 2018. W-9I Pl a I DI.y Sanitary Sewer and Watermain No extension of any public sanitary sewer or watermain tnmk lines is required. The existing home will continue to use the current water and sewer service from Red Cedar Point Road. The new home will require a new service connection to the available trunk sanitary sewer and watermain. The fees associated with the service connections will be $2,924.00. The city WAC and SAC fees related to the service connections will be collected with the building permit. LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION Existing Canopy Coverage Proposed Canopy Coverage The site's current estimated tree canopy coverage is 42 percent and the applicant is proposing to maintain a tree canopy coverage of 36 percent. Since this exceeds the City Code's minimum standard of 35 percent tree canopy coverage, no replacement tree planting is required. The lots Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June19,2018 Page 8 of 10 will still be required to meet the city's minimum requirement to have one tree located in the front yard. 1LO 7s T'q ITDTy 7�.1 YZI7L1 The property has access to the Minnewashta Parkway pedestrian trail and to Roundhouse Neighborhood Park. The applicant will need to pay park dedication fees for one lot at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. At today's rate, that would be a payment of a $5,800. This fee will be deposited in the city's park and trail dedication fund for utilization on future park and trail improvements. COMPLIANCE TABLE Area (sq. ft.) Width (ft. Depth ft. Hard Cover % / s . ft. Notes Code 15,000 90 125 25 / 3,750 Lot 1 20,417 79.96* 253.09 5,104 Lot 2 23,572 90 255.06 5,893 ROW 595 Total 44,584 1 1 1.024 Setbacks: 30 feet front and rear; 10 feet side *Variance: 10.04-foot lot width variance for lot 1, block 1. Staff recommends that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the preliminary plat for a 2 lot subdivision, and a 10.04-foot lot frontage variance for lot 1, block 1 Red Cedar Point as shown in plans dated May 15, 2018 subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the findings of fact and recommendation: Buildine: 1. Provide a 1:200 "clean" plat drawing. 2. Demolition permits required for the removal of any existing structures. 3. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 9 of 10 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 6. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. Engineering: 1. Drawing 4 — Site and Utility Plan: a) Change detail 1006 (Gate Valve and Box Installation) to detail 1005 (Water Service). b) Add City details 5202A (Bituminous Street Patching), 5203 (Curb and Gutter), 5208 (Concrete Driveway), 5209 (Bituminous Driveway), and 5221 (Tie Card). c) An abandoned watermain exists between the sanitary sewer and the watermain. Add note to make this known to the sanitary sewer and water installation contractor. 2. Drawing 5 — Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan: a) Add City details 5301 (Rock Construction Entrance) and 5302B (Erosion Control for Individual Lots) b) Provide geotechnical report. c) Include first floor elevation of buildings on adjacent lots. d) Existing and proposed elevations shall be shown at each lot comer and top of the curb at the lot line extension. e) Identify proposed soil stockpile locations. f) If importing or exporting soils for the development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 3. SAC and WAC fees due at the rate in force at time of building permit application. Environmental Resources: 1. Tree protection fencing must be properly installed at the edge of the grading limits as shown on the plans dated 5/15/18. This must be done prior to any construction activities and remain installed until all construction is completed. Any trees lost to construction activities shall be replaced. 2. No equipment or materials may be stored within the tree protection area. 3. One tree must be planted in the front of each yard, as per city requirements. Parks: 1. Park dedication fees for one lot at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. Planning Commission 3861 Red Cedar Point Road — Planning Case #2018-10 June 19, 2018 Page 10 of 10 Plannint=_: 1. An escrow of 110 percent of the estimated demolition costs for the demolition of the detached garage on lot 2, block 1 must be received, and the detached garage must be removed within four months of the approval of the final plat. Water Resources: 1. All permits and approvals must be received from other regulatory agencies prior to issuing permits. 2. Must show existing and proposed drainage. 3. The applicant will need to pay the surface water management (SWMP) fee for 1.010 acres at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. Should the Planning Commission deny the preliminary and variance request, it is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion and attached Finding of Fact and Decision: "The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies preliminary plat with a 10.04 lot width variance for lot 1, block 1, Red Cedar Point and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decisions. ATTACHMENTS 1) Findings of Fact (Approval) 2) Findings of Fact (Denial) 3) Application for Development Review 4) Subdivision and Final Plat Narrative 5) May 15 Variance Narrative 6) Final Plat Documents 7) Engineering memo 8) Public Hearing Notice Documents gAplan\2018 planning cases\I8-10 3861 red cedar point rd subdivision & var\stafrreport red cedar point sub & var.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Red Cedar Point Addition Planning Case 18-10 On June 19, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of a Preliminary Plat to Subdivide a 1.02 Acre Lot into two (2) single- family Lots with a variance, Red Cedar Point. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Findin : The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single Family District and the zoning ordinance if the lot width variance is approved. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the comprehensive plan and subdivision ordinance. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. C. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets. 8. Variances. — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The intent of the zoning code's minimum lot width is to ensure sufficient space for a building pad that can accommodate a house and garage while meeting the district's 10-foot side yard setbacks. The proposed lot width of 79.96' is still able to accommodate the 60-foot by 60-foot building pad required by ordinance. Additionally, property has an existing house which is configured in such a way as to accommodate a home and garage within the side yard setbacks. Due to the presence and configuration of the existing home the requested variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: In order to comply with the minimum lot width stipulated in the zoning code, atypical lot configurations would be required. These configurations would result in unnecessary public right of way dedications and increased impervious surfaces within the shoreland management district. The applicants proposed lot dimensions and use for the property is reasonable and would be permitted, but for the reduced lot width on block 1, lot 1. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The existing lot was created prior to current single-family residential district zoning standards. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: Granting the variance would allow for the property to be subdivided in a manner consistent with the neighborhoods existing development pattern. Multiple properties in the vicinity do not meet the district's minimum lot width. Additionally, several of the proposed alternatives that would not require a variance would result in a subdivision with features that are atypical for this neighborhood. £ Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 9. The planning report Planning Case 18-10, dated June 19, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the preliminary plat for a 2 lot subdivision, and a 10.04-foot lot frontage variance for lot 1, block I Red Cedar Point as shown in plans dated May 15, 2018 subject to the conditions of approval. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 19'b day of June, 2018. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Chairman gAplanM18 planning cases\I8-10 3861 red cedar point td subdivision & var`findings of fact (approval).doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Red Cedar Point Addition Planning Case 18-10 On June 19, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of a Preliminary Plat to Subdivide a 1.02 Acre Lot into two (2) single- family Lots with a variance, Red Cedar Point. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision as proposed does not meet the requirements of the Single -Family Residential District. A variance from the district's minimum lot widths required. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the comprehensive plan and subdivision ordinance. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Findin : The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. C. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets. 8. Variances. — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The intent of the zoning code's minimum lot width is to allow for an adequately sized front yard and sufficient spacing between residential driveways. Allowing the creation of new lot that does not meet the district's minimum lot width would not be in line with the intent of the district. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The homeowner has shown multiple concept subdivisions that could comply with the district's requirements. The inability create the preferred configuration for the lots is not a practical difficulty. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The existing lot was created prior to current single-family residential district zoning standards. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: Granting the variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 9. The planning report Planning Case 18-10, dated June 19, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council deny the preliminary plat for a 2 lot subdivision, and a 10.04-foot lot frontage variance for lot 1, block 1 Red Cedar Point as shown in plans dated May 15, 2018. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 19th day of June, 2018. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Fra Chairman gAp1an\2018 planning cases\18-10 3861 red cedar point rd subdivision & vatlSndings of fact (denied).doc COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 CITE OF CgANgASSEN APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW yJ Submittal Date: PC Date: lU - I CC Dater 60-Day Review Date: I V Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply) (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ All Others ......................................................... $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 El All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Rezoning (REZ) ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD................. $100 ❑ All Others ......................................................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Administrative.................................................. $100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts*......................$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: (_ thousand square feet) Include number of existing employees: Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_ units) j] Subdivision (SUB) ❑� Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot (_ lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots) .................................. $300 ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑� Final Plat..........................................................$700 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)* *Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑� Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. 0 Notification Sign (city to install and remove)...................................................................................................................... $200 0 Property Owners List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address ( 50 addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)....................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation 0 Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements( easements) ❑ Deeds TOTAL FEE: $1,600.00 Section-2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Subdivision approval for a split of a singel parcel into 2 parcels Property Address or Location: 3861 Red Cedar Point Road, Chanhassen, MN. 55331 Parcel #: 250080700 Legal Description: See Attached Total Acreage: 1.02 Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes ® No Present Zoning: Single -Family Residential District (RSF) Requested Zoning: Single -Family Residential District (RSF) Present Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Requested Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Existing Use of Property: Single family residence QCheck box if separate narrative is attached. PropertySection 3: . Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Estate Development Corporation Contact: Tom Gonyea Address: 15250 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 101 Phone: (612) 990-0666 City/State/Zip: Wayzata, MN. 55391 Cell: Email: tom@landmn.com Fax: Signature: Y ply VV �byT—C' 5/14/18 Tom Gonyea O '. 218MM 13: 18:12 d W Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Estate Development Corporation Contact: Tom Gonyea Address: 15250 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 101 Phone: (612) 990-0666 City/State/Zip: Wayzata, MN. 55391 Cell: Email: tom@landmn.com Fax: Signature: Tom Gonyea o° d m' osTM:ss Date: 5/15/18 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Allianl Engineering, Inc. Contact: Mark Rausch Address. 233 Park Ave. So. Suite 300 Phone: (612) 767-9339 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN. 55415 Cell: Email: mrausch@alliant-inc.com Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: ❑ Property Owner Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑� Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: 0 Engineer Via: Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. SAVE FORM PRINT FORM 3UBMR FORM PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND FINAL PLAT REQUEST SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE RED CEDAR POINT CHANHASSEN,NENNESOTA May 15, 2018 SITE INFORMATION IRgai Description: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence North 89 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds East along the North line of said Section a distance of 670.0 feet thence South 7 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 720.0 feet to the centerline of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline a distance of 222.0 feet to a point distant 576.4 feet Northwesterly of the East Line of said Government Lot 1, as measured along the centerline of said Red Cedar Point Road, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described, and which point is also the Northeasterly comer of that tract of land described in the fast description appearing in Book 51 of Deeds, Page 884, office of the Register of Deeds, Carver County, Minnesota; thence continuing South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline of Red Cedar Pont Road a distance of 197.0 feet; thence South 13 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 254.25 feet thence North 77 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 211.69 feet more or less to the Easterly Line of said tract as described in said Book 51 of Deeds, page 884; thence North 16 degrees 42 minutes 50 seconds East along said Easterly Line a distance of 292.17 feet more or less to the actual point of beginning and there terminating. Excepting therefrom that part taken for Red Cedar Point Road. Except all that part of the above described land lying Easterly of the West line of the tract of land described in Certificate of Title No. 5187, Files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota, which tract of land is described as follows: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence east on the North Line of said Section a distance of 670 feet to the center line of Glencoe Road; thence South 8 degrees 56 minutes West along the center of Glencoe Road for a distance of 713.4 feet to the intersection of the center line of said Glencoe Road with the center line of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 65 degrees 56 minutes east along the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 619 feet to the initial point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 33 degrees 25 minutes west for a distance of 210 feet thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes west 166.90 feet to a point; thence northeasterly on a line having a bearing of North 16 degrees 10 minutes east a distance of 273.77 feet; more or less, to the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road; thence southeasterly on the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 224.17 feet, more or less, to the place of beginning, all in Carver County, State of Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part taken for said Red Cedar Point Road. Torrents Property Torrens Certificate No. 37556.0 Address: 3861 Red Cedar Point Road, Chanhassen, MN. 55331 PID & Acreage: 250080700, 1.023 acres Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page I of 4 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND FINAL PLAT REQUEST The proposed plan consists of a low density single family residential subdivision that splits an existing parcel into 2 single family residential lots. The existing home would remain on I parcel and a new home would be constructed on the new lot. EXISTING SITE DESCRIPTION The development site is 1.02 acres and is bound by Red Cedar Point Road to the north and existing residential properties to the east, west and south. The property currently includes one single family residence and one accessory garage building. The existing residence has two driveway connections to Red Cedar Point Road. The property frontage abutting Red Cedar does have a 3.5' roadway easement that when added to existing dedicated right of way equates to a 50' right of way corridor along the entire property roadway frontage. The property topography has a highpoint roughly midpoint from the north and south lot boundary, with the north half draining northerly and the south half drains southerly. The parcel has scattered tree coverage typical of a larger residential lot. There are no wetlands on the site. Comprehensive Plan Designation The application area has a current and firture Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation of Residential Low Density. The adjacent land uses are also Residential Low Density. The Residential Low Density land use guides for single family housing density of 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre and the City has typically used an average of 2 units per acres for projection of land demand. The proposed development plan has a density of 1.98 units per net acre and so is consistent with the current and future Comprehensive Guide Plan land use for the property. Zoning Classification The property has a current zoning classification of RSF — Single Family Residential District as do the surrounding properties to the east, west and south. The property to the north along Red Cedar Cove is zoned PUDR — Planned Unit Development/Residential District. The existing parcel does have adequate size and dimension to allow for platting of a 2-lot subdivision compliant with RSF zoning regulations. Though the property can develop as 2 lots within RSF guidelines, a variance is proposed for one small concession to RSF zoning standards. See separate narrative for variance request. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN The applicant's intent is to create a 2-lot single family residential development that is consistent with the existing single family lots in the vicinity of the property and is considerate of market demands. Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 2 of 4 The Developer is proposing to keep the existing home on one of the new lots and build a new home on the other. The existing home would be modified by removing the existing detached tuck under garage and existing screen porch and deck. A new 2-stall attached garage will be constructed on the existing home. The new home will be a custom built home set back from Red Cedar Road similarly to the existing home. The homebuilder for the new home is not known at this time. The followine is a summary of orimary nroiect elements currently nronosed: Gross Acreage 1.024 acres Wetland Area 0.0 acres Red Cedar Pointe Road R/W Dedication 0.014 acres Net Buildable Acreage 1.010 acres Net Density 1.98 units per acre Proposed Proposed Lot Dimensions RSF Standard Lot 1 Lot 2 Width along R/W Frontage 90'(min.) 79.96' 1 90, Width at 30' Front Setback 80.75' 90, Lot Depth 125' (min.) 253.09' 255.06' Lot Size Minimum 15,000 sf 20,417 sf 23,572 sf Setbacks: Side Setbacks 10, 10, 10, Front Setback to R/W 30' 30' 30' Rear Setback 30' 30' 30' 1. Refer to separate variance request narrative for Lot 1 lot width. Vehicular Site Access and Pedestrian Circulation The proposed development does not require construction of any new public roadway or walkways. Right of way access for vehicles and pedestrians is available to both lots via Red Cedar Point Road. GradinP The only grading required will be what is necessary to: remove the existing home's garage and screen porch, construct the new garage on the existing home and build the new home. All earthmoving activities necessary for construction will require erosion and sediment control per City of Chanhassen requirements. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain The project does not require extension of any public sanitary sewer or watermain trunk lines. The existing home will continue to use the current water and sewer service from Red Cedar Point Road. The new home will require a new service connection to the available trunk sanitary sewer and watermain. Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 3 of 4 Stormwater Management The development is located within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; however, the City of Chanhassen and the City's Surface Water Management Plan provides governmental jurisdiction. The proposed development's size and impact area does not trigger any stormwater management requirements and thus no new stormwater treatment facilities are required. The lots are located within the Shoreland Management District and thus are limited to a maximum of 25% of impervious surface per lot. Wetlands The are no onsite wetlands. Tree Preservation The estimated baseline tree canopy coverage for the existing site is 42% of the net area (excluding perimeter right of way dedication). Per the City code, low density residential is then allowed to remove to a limit of 35% tree canopy prior to requirement of mitigation. The development plan proposes to maintain tree canopy coverage of 36% and thus no tree replacement is required per City Ordinance. Landscaping Each lot is required to install a minimum of one deciduous or conifer tree in the front yard, in accordance with the City's Subdivision Ordnance. The new tree must either be an 8' conifer or 2.5" deciduous with species chosen from the City's approved list. TINIING/PHASING If the City approves the variance and subdivision request, it is the Applicant's desire to proceed with modifications to the existing home and placing both lots are the market. CONCLUSION The applicant respectfully concludes that this request for subdivision approval will allow for a development consistent with adjacent single family residential lots and the City Goals and Objectives for this area. Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 4 of 4 VARIANCE REQUEST SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE RED CEDAR POINT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA May 15, 2018 SITE INFORMATION Legal Description: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence North 89 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds East along the North line of said Section a distance of 670.0 feet; thence South 7 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 720.0 feet to the centerline of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline a distance of 222.0 feet to a point distant 576.4 feet Northwesterly of the East Line of said Government Lot 1, as measured along the centerline of said Red Cedar Point Road, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tact of land to be described, and which point is also the Northeasterly comer of that tract of land described in the first description appearing in Book 51 of Deeds, Page 884, office of the Register of Deeds, Carver County, Minnesota; thence continuing South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline of Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 197.0 feet; thence South 13 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 254.25 feet; thence North 77 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 211.69 feet more or less to the Easterly Line of said tract as described in said Book 51 of Deeds, page 884; thence North 16 degrees 42 minutes 50 seconds East along said Easterly Line a distance of 292.17 feet more or less to the actual point of beginning and there terminating. Excepting therefrom that part taken for Red Cedar Point Road. Except all that part of the above described land lying Easterly of the West line of the tract of land described in Certificate of Title No. 5187, Files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota, which tract of land is described as follows: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence east on the North Line of said Section a distance of 670 feet to the center line of Glencoe Road; thence South 8 degrees 56 minutes West along the center of Glencoe Road for a distance of 713.4 feet to the intersection of the center line of said Glencoe Road with the center line of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 65 degrees 56 minutes east along the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 619 feet to the initial point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 33 degrees 25 minutes west for a distance of 210 feet; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes west 166.90 feet to a point; thence northeasterly on a line having a bearing of North 16 degrees 10 minutes east a distance of 273.77 feet; more or less, to the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road; thence southeasterly on the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 224.17 feet, more or less, to the place of beginning, all in Carver County, State of Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part taken for said Red Cedar Point Road. Toren Property Toren Certificate No. 37556.0 Address: 3861 Red Cedar Point Road, Chanhassen, MN. 55331 PID & Acreage: 250080700, 1.023 acres Variance Request May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 1 of 3 DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUEST The proposed request for variance from City Code is for permission to allow for a proposed subdivision that includes 1 single family residential lot with a minimum lot right of way frontage of 79.96 feet. The City's Zoning Ordinance for RSF — Single Family Residential identifies a minimum lot frontage width of 90' for standard lots. Design Alternatives The applicant has explored site design alternatives to investigate if there is an option that would not require a variance to subdivide the existing parcel into 2 lots. A total of 3 alternative were developed, see attached concept plans and following descriptions: Concept A: Site option would expand/dedicate additional right of way along Red Cedar Point Road. The additional right of way would be provided with an are into the project resulting in 90 lineal feet of right of way frontage each lot. Both lots would meet all criteria for RSF zoning standards. Concept B: Site option would expand/dedicate additional right of way along Red Cedar Point Road. The additional right of way would be provided in an `eyebrow' shape similar to a cul-de-sac bulb. The resultant lot configuration would result in 90+ lineal feet of frontage for each lot and the lots would have 90 feet in width at the 30' front setback. Both lots would meet all criteria for RSF zoning standards. Concept C: Site option uses the City zoning code definition of flag lot to define 2 new parcels. As conceptualized the existing home would be situated in a flag lot that is designed with a 100' width at the flag start including a 30' setback to the existing home. The second lot would meet the 90' right of way frontage and 90' lot width at the front setback. Both lots would meet all criteria for RSF zoning standards. Alternate Summary Concepts A, B and C show that there are RSF zoning code compliant alternatives to the submitted plan but they would result in less desirable plat options for the City and Applicant. The additional dedication of public right of way in Concept A and B would result in a reduction the taxable land for the City of Chanhassen and lower development fee receipt. The additional right of way either in arch or bulb shape would create the right of way frontage length and minimum lot width at the front setback that the City identifies in the City Code but serve no infrastructure purpose. Concept C does provides a RSF code compliant flag lot line configuration but the plan creates unconventional lots that could present coordination issues between the future lot owners. Preferred Option Summary The proposed variance request plan does contain one lot (new home) that will meet all RSF zoning criteria. The other lot with the existing home would need a variance for reduced lot width but it Variance Request May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 2 of 3 would still maintain a width of 80 lineal feet right of way frontage and be 80+ feet in width at the 30' front setback. Both lots would meet or exceed the desired 60' wide x 60' deep building pads or buildable area. The proposed variance would result in lots that do not require additional right of way dedication, and provides a new lot line that is parallel to the existing west parcel boundary creating a typical lot line that is clearly defined for future owners. VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION Check to City findings for granting a variance (pursuant to City Code Section 20-58): a) The requested variance results in a subdivision that would be in harmony with RSF zoning standards. Non -typical design alternatives do exist to technically create an RSF zoning complaint plan, however, they would have other detriments that are less beneficial to the City nor are as marketable for future lot/home owners. The variance request creates a subdivision that is consistent with the surrounding residential properties, of which, some are smaller than 90' wide themselves, including the property directly abutting the development site to the west. The variance request creates a plan that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and results in a land use density just under the City's estimate average demand within low density residential land use. b) The variance is not being requested for the property owner to use the property in a manner not permitted by RSF zoning standards. The proposed subdivision plan and requested variance is in substantial conformance to RSF zoning with one minor exception. c) The variance is not being requested for economic considerations alone. The variance is being requested to avoid unnecessary dedication of public right of way and to allow creation of lots with typical configuration reducing chance of conflict between future lot owners. d) The plight of the current landowner is due to the parcel being subdivided to its width prior to current RSF zoning standards and not at any fault of the landowner. There are existing lots near the proposed subdivision that also do not meet RSF zoning standards for lot width and thus the proposed variance request is reasonable. e) The variance if granted will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed variance plan will result in a subdivision that is consistent with the existing neighborhood. f) The variance is not being requested for earth sheltered construction. CONCLUSION The applicant respectfully concludes that the request for variance and subdivision will allow for a development consistent with adjacent single family residential lots and the City Goals and Objectives for this area. Variance Request May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 3 of 3 �a cYa (E9.9i wy a A 4%d4 � _ a 44 0 20 40 80 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT DEVELOPED USING COUNTY GIS AND LIDAR TOPOGRAPHY x,ea,e.mn.e M^II6 P➢iM�tE A.S,i9 Ym. RED CEDAR POINT ROAD PROPERTY AJI aENVWWs.a dp� O w Mircwnp %. MN 5 15 c ea euM; nrn BOUNDARY AND TOPO W/ LOT SPLIT CONCEPT B -R/W BULB" 612.Ms w or s k CHANHASSEN, MN e1z]5 SM FM vm^w.dliB,6tr,cCOm l Ql. r-w b �# 4+ � PM C +jam - I/ 1 a w tl ., t k' -...f AL71 - R A+ 59.E5 5 N O zD ao 80 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT DEVELOPED USING COUNTY GIS AND LiDAR TOPOGRAPHY a ED CEOgR N I 0 20 40 tN SCALE IN IFFY RED CEDAR POINT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA n'Be itnt av J y.s rg 4 4... Lake x MmnnW.ShtO Cedar Poin a '9yY W 6 'Y14 ¢ /1 Lake Sr ♦ w'.,mi� n. 5 A PROJECT LOCATION I' In � uxoscwE A16OENY a+pP VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" 2000' SHEET IlVDEX NO. COVERSHEET 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT 3 SITE AND UTILITY PLAN 4 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 5 TREE CANOPY COVERAGE PLAN 6 TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN 7 DEVELOPER ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 15250 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 101 WAYZATA, MN 55391 PH: 612-990-0666 CONTACT: TOM GONYEA EM: tom@landmn.com CONSULTANT ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC. 233 PARK AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 PH: 612-758-3080 FX: 612-758-3099 MARK RAUSCH LICENSE NO. 43480 EM: mtaosch a@alliant-mc.com SURVEYOR N DENNIS B. OLMSTEAD LICENSE NO. 18425 EM: dolmstead@alliant-inc.com ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 6127583080 uRe+ 612.758.3099 Pra svww.alliant-inc.com I n.ne, -,J, 'P-TfR cnex. P,.wme er . ey D.r PROn5A0NK IN. 1.— .1 If, NINNFSGTI J ca m th a J a J Q Z LL r w W Q = CZ � C Q W cc o a cJ .of W. pm. e.. my and ~ I ..a RGINEE a uM.. SM. I Y40( .N101. PE Gaw Yx w x . QUA ASSURANCE/CONtIIOL w G4n DATE ISSUE s-+s-+e rnx aexmu PROJECT TEAK DATA M9GNE0: YPR GRAN.: Ea PROJECT NO: a+e-eore L' SNEET 1 of 7 T (T MN QR 4C a rWia 23 I rwAn rwPem i CgMT CL4 MIP.NI'NY mw P JW�Mm , � II'nNdaC,gPl v \ Qi \ \ \is \ Y- I • II I �zist "Exr r, ^N wax //F- hfi\lit 11 h-;nty' ;aYX 1 1Li p 0 X K_ q% Wis.ix...p ).,i�nrao .fdl was_�.{g®)Yp �M. X.Wi SA -Xpner C--PIZ WIT xmaa y1,� MviaX Na. LINE On °1 XYHt� aoSAmlr XWOUR,-I 12 c. astiyT2BBB x x iWi /T 4v I \ \ it X.I1T ` JJff Luse __v_M, ie. 4 --EXCEPTION -- EOf50✓®N G0.T. NO SNr AMJ AYN'PMF ?.YAR[£S IIXVrXN'J /8 � I - R _ _%tare I xzaa I / 5pe fT'Sa= /66gG _ J LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Wind rtknMb rem Conmmseab WMWWdW detoutol Carver. 3dRd Minnesota artl hihisso E es Mbxs- TINT per; o b[IO,5e5tiJnn. q. Mp 116 NOf.,tS 23Wesy Wrv.Cou do,him, 1. 0escn0ee asmends:Cht Wong o, me NOMwe51Pomh, isale, of 6706:mere[¢NOM 69d7Q9ee19 nlnules A sewnds Fesr¢Ions No?9.a W sap SeCnono"no. Rho Ceose Porn, SONn r degrees 49 ollounis 51 Sttonds WeSatlalana of on, h¢19me.. oesneof fled Os Ppm ll in: mFrte SouthOS tlegrees 5: mbNes lO seconds East along sad cenletline a tlisbnrn of i2201eello ¢ point distant S]6.a Wier I.shP @rly of me,o Linea Pont evalwg Ne Mn18NrMUSaid flMo mono Poo: he No sep poly; Cner of hatO pint o! Ce9innitm oI,O o-en d Wd ,m hscriMQ Bo vk 51 fDe b' also me NodheeNeey corner W 11N14acl of tlemiced In me first OeSMplm eppeanng in fimk 51 W Demos. Poge B6a, oMw of ma Peg'ute: W OreGs. Laver Lounry, Mirreeora; manwcmAnubp SpuN W d yew' 61 uses 1^- scwrps East abriy ee:d ammYrre N FM CaOar Pam PoaU a diSarrce a 19] OfieC tlw¢e SwN 13 tlegrees ;5 minNes 00 seconds Wazl a dslance o125a251M;11ierwe NOM P NBrees a2 minutes 10 umrda weals CirmN a z: f s91ee1 trot¢ pr lass m ma Briery we of sad vas u tlevwm In sMe I3vox sl a Deem. page eea: m.na NmN I6 degrees az niN,nu w aewrpz Ear anrlg ud Eurerlr L;ae a daMriu Nz9z tr kel more or less fi me.Mal paim ol4ginnm8 and Here rermbaang. EiWptirre merehom mdl wrl dken br FM Cede Pard flpad. asgs, 9 tlat part aIN, .hove eesv+ilmtl livid tying Eesterry of me war Wre of To tract of Fund desenni e t si (:erne ardk No. s6r.lYes N H.]hmar mrNtl, Carver Coim1Y. Mlnneeep. wncn Ina o16 J e dtlo'DM atpeaee PAIM pYl MGovemmen; W 1, Beeden e. Tum nsnip t;6 NJM, .1, 9 Wes;, dKeriO.d.s Idlowe'. Come "i ftM N.faW Servo .: she. .1 on Too f, 1 Imo Waeid Sec - na of6N too 1 Ne turns of Gl Rote, T n S n6 dl Pi most al ng the rf WGI — Boedb distance fr13 fiset 10 fine 'ins —on 0N f line of atl Giih,00e F. wMm I the of Peel Ir loot Ii l.'cn Soul 65 degree Sr m,n..s Woof ol 4 of vp Red Cedes Ph— Ilwd dTan o1619 feN to Ne p�_o'deg. ^g I' prpbde Irtdi ren Scum l9 degrea5 25 rtti nb b dlssan W210k-Nn NM9]tlegree500 N I1W.WIee11 p1L ma.srrorVio,o Os ere wr n9a P. Np.. onsto ienc mnN. .i nSheced2 line .L w �, I I R ssMeJ a lira OI e&e 17 region Pavel...1, 1the P -Of m92dy on h cannot line N ty HW CNar Point Hoedeting Thin p22a.1rha, mere Wless, to the plan of yinning..11'm Carr[County, sme a McNnW, Wr«pug mm p.n lexc forme sad Hm ceea Poet Helm. T. Freon/ Tasty¢ Cardfik No.3rYbA NOTES 1, ThW Lry. aW Ne PoPm'/ glutcPtio Mission iereM. CYBO r.m Yft . ded'Ntlu o>nNa9ra0b title iaurenw pnpene ey GWMn Ibme BJder TNe, LLC We bu'eg sgm148bwed Trek Gi (fmpen, Com—so no. MBarlss, coed April is zofe. 2 Tu lope! o[ a entlegavm wiucs are eeaau dasm m Wipmtemnvm Gap+r st.h oucan:y.Mmf. e'Bwne s, Survey jh,hi . Tx mkmaeon woo le p'o+ee W Ey a caniYrmttri a uaanap. W e a. prcsee P*m, or is, rmnOa Who hit, berms wku+mry mot ce. ""', an wli6s vmp ibmmnuttion w teeth 3. TM unwhissn W mu oisi ry ism is eased on me Carver Couny mxdruk system NNI)i a. M Ub'dirt.'Bb an'm Mt. 5, TM e25 of tlp aCwe dddM pcperry 6 MSMzpiwe kN IX tf fP3 ava. 6. Bencn M. TN. m Ire NcWhsWW.— o1 The so...'on.1 Hm Gee. Punt Asset . B. Chi Cove has m .., M SBa a9 Wier UNm is as0. r. Survey Mated nwpooN sot br in... S. SBNm Two of me.. CPnmNn hL Tarns aM cone com d EavrMn ei hvw aI ViY.t< a QaMaaen. az n6N b COCNMM de1M ie0ruary 2BN.19r3. fl14 NIMI D.1813. 6: Wymeni No.l&V6 LEGEND • FOLWO IFON MONUMENT —C GNS ® MR CONDITIONER D-- SANITMRY gWER EM ELECTRIC METER »— STORM SEWER ® GAS METER I— WATOOLAN ® SANITARY MANHUE —E UNDERPtOtNO ELECTRIC ® cute STOP w OVERHEAD UTILITY D ELECTRIC Box X— FENCE R MAIL BOX /`!V1"rra FENCE D CABLE BOx CONCRETE POur -0 PQE RtAVEL SURFACE M : SPOT ELEVATION BITUMINOUS SFUnMX (p) PLAN ELEVATIONS rRLE ,,r®DECIWWS S � l COMF1]EWS TREE D LS 30 0o N SC® 1� .sYytlRMvv.Y.OlMt elai.rt / F.P�edW me v raMv sM dies aQSNIMvs NC/Na Nwumisd 733 Marquette Ave, Ste 300 ftii sMreprudvN.m.paN.mMa Minneapolis, MN 55415 MWWWWWWL 612.758.3080 Mery DENT IS&OLMSra.n 612.758.3099 EAx r REVIEW ALLIANT iMiNM'.alllant-inc.com signals. akeleee.r.. Mrv-XIIB 1114125 OWn IJINw NnEr BUSTING CONDITIONS CRe"m e" ctimmoS6Y sae RED CEDAR POINT BGAIE ,�,D ,1oexD. ,anal. LOT 3 3861 RED CEDAR POINT RD CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA T x 0 10 20 IO SCALE IIN FEET 9Fn PARCEL AREA TABLE PARCEL AREA SF MFA AC B1i1 2061] DafiM B1-Lz 33.512 e5a1 Row SB5 e014 TOTAL na,seA 1.oza oNwMf NND ImnN EAW 6•IG Pam sloxel ixLa: SJ+ �s xorroaAls sM�N s en n rm,.c.gaN.N w.®ae +v �1 « .Mn.n.a �m�a.dau�enavwrw LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE RIGHT OF WAY — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE SECTION LINE E' DRAINAGE AND EASEMENT • E D IRON MONUMENT ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MNN 612.758.3099 PAx www.alliant-inc.com J FQF F fL 7 N F g a J F Q z Z o LL IL z ¢ a Z7 Q Q o w z W ^ _z rL V a J J 13 i W W W i ¢ ccccU a a I n•ner .•Wry that mb vlcn. •P.aRaa.an... •waN . P•.Ra�.d N n, aaa.•�n.r ona at. .ay.mtlon mm I a amr ua.e..a PPOR5510NA ENGINEER undo M. M.• a1 M. sh"..1 YINNES A "W MIRLN. PE DUALITY ASSURANCE/CDMROL PROJECT TEAM DATA Do...; MPR DRA.: LL PROJECT N0: 319-W>G 3 sNEE* 3 of 7 C` R vNeAOE I YErAt " Es' AOI NSrN,F➢ MIS 4J'pEf Tr A6 Ah eaw WTADE CD r PANTm L aax. n 64E%AP ON IMF POSTS WNE gy(.D:O EN0 AS, otaa 60b C t G' wG 6a1-m APE MeE M.CPE 1/.• PEN Poor QR`A2 NAN(EA �l/2 Ii[ OMIFIFA YN ISFE NOTE I3) ONAWTT IW I 5i[LLS - eOITEIPf RU Ml FNR (MW GP$iED) i MEV SW1Mf Sf7EA SFAWt£ 6 NJL .LLmPNNfy eT A W1FR $EM1CF W Txc SANE rNL1gL rmAu A luw IrTM TFE PBrG PRa Nvwr ro s ABTE N19PD Q.LE Mp PINf Ty e' 6P p65T npSTSllt pRp1 IMNI. a 6UNyT NEq,Vry ax NbWIF WOifR1Y r OSNIICE TMy YA@I m NOJSE EREiDe sb FECf .. AL rME s (:1 a ®Om m muull+ emna ta..9.aP) a cwNSE faTw TYPICAL SANITARY e®YOE SEWER SERVICE ( LESS THAN 16' DEEP) >o-N ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2001 4 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET SM! WYE } +56 IE O MAIN 3948.93 IE O R/W 950.1 PROPOSED SANITARY AND WATER SERVICES -, FOR LOT 2 SAN.-6' PVC SDR 25 WAT -1' TYPE 'K' REMOVE AND REPLACE PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY FOR SERVICE INSTALLATION.. PAVEMENT SHALL BE REPLACED WITH EQUIVALENT PAVEMENT SECTION / I AFo CFOgq N. .�! 100/1vT ..... I / / / �IX B' PVC SANITARY FX 10' HOPE WATERMAIN �IX SANITARY AND WATER SERVICES FOR LOT f TO REMNN I It / I / / , E%I E _ TO BE EMOMO VED / BE REMOVED / IN E 951.9 / / / �lEX[IIrnNRFAMAN I / / / / SAMPLEPDOMIRINT / / -_._ _• / BtO K/ 1 LTECT I NIINGOWALL0 AND PORCH / DEac DECK ro BE REMOVED / SITE PLAN DATA: GROSS AREA 1.024 ACRES NOW DEDIC TON 0.014 ACRES NET BUIlN9LE ARIA 1.010 ACRES PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS 2 NET DENSRY 1.90 UWPS/NET ACRE EXISTING ZONING RSF - SINGLE FAMILY Rf510EN1WL DSTMCr PROPOSED ZONING RSF - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT EXISTING LAND USE RESDEN114- IOW DENSITY PROPOSED LAND USE RESIDENRLL LDW DENSITY PROPOSED MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT MOM SETBACK 60.75 FT (LOT 1) PROPOSED MINNUM LOT WIDBI AT MCHW SETB,.LI( 90 FT (LOT 2) LOT DATA TABLE 6O X CM7 MINIMUM PAD AREA SETBACKS • ALLOWABLE •• LO LOT (SF) -- IMPERVOUS FRONT REAR (SF) 1 1 20, 417 30 30 5,104 1 2 23.572 30 30 S,R93 • SIDE SETBACKS, SEE TYPICAL LOT DETAIL •• 25% MAXIMUM IMPERVOUSAOT PER CITY OF CHANHASSED DEVELOPMENT REGUTATIONS o_ r 6IY1Bbt YIE' e I � i - Euu WAsonR� _ ID]4•R I I r-wlmN DE2ImTz ro nr, ! ` I le SUIME PD]IPRW! I L-b.Rw sl Is TANG. La aJ OTMENASE. ... TYPICAL LOT DETAIL DT To �AIUE LEGEND ------ EASEMENT uw - — — - BUILDING SETBACK PROPERTY UNE LOT UNE - ROW - EXISTING OVERHEAD UnIDY EXISTING GAS EXISTING SNdVRY SEWER —_- - -_— EXISTING WATERNNN —�— PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER — PROPOSED WATERMNN UTILITY NOTES: 1. EXISTING UnUnES. SERVICE LOCATIONS AND EIEVAKRb SHALL BE VERInEO IN FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. GOMRM'TOa IS RES ON5IBt£ FOR ALL PERTaIS PRIOR TO THE SPAT OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL UTILTY WORK WITHIN THE R.O.W. SAE COMPLY WITH THE CRY OF CHAIHASSEN ENGNEERNG GUIDELINES. 4. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 4a 140en IN ADVANCE OF ANY UBUTY WEAK 5. PROVIDE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL IN COMPLIANCE WITH MNOOT 'TEMPORARY T INTIC CONTROL ZONE IAYOUTS-n" MAXIM' UTEsr RENSKN, FOR AFY WNSIRLICIION WITHIN! PUBLIC R.O.W. 6. THE l%NIRACIai SHM1 CONTACT THE SEWER AND WATER DEPARTMENT 24 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY PU&IC SWIIt/WATIRMNN CONNECTION. 7. SANITARY SEWER SEANCES WALL BE INSTM PER CITY OF CIIANHASSN SPEaE1CAnON4 AND DUAL PLATES B WATERMAN SRNCES STALL BE INSTAL PER CITY OF CHANHASSEN SPECIFICATIONS AND DUAL PUTS& S. TYPICAL LOT SRNCES, SARI - 6' PAC S]LMEIT WELDED SOR 26 (SEE DUAL 2001) WAT - 1- TYPE -K' COPPER (SEE DETA- 1006) 011ie ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MAIN 612.758.3099 NAX www.alliant-inc.com FJ F m rn a z J g a Z_ o LL O 0 a z F o w z o LU Z Lu W < Q 2 U IL :A I N-1a, e.mry that MIe Plan, w l as o and I. ly TrM e.1y ua.n..a PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER uMn NM1. l... at Ma Stall of NNESOTA MAAR MI:XH, PE QUALTTY ASSURANCE/GOMTROI .1 DATE DATE ISSUE DESIGN@ YPR auwx: [u PROJECT NG: 2le-W7e 4 SNELI 4 of 7 EI i E a 0 GRADING NOTES: I. PRIOR TO STAHIINC WNSRUONON. THE CONTRACTOR SHELL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTNNED. NO CONSTRUCWN OR FABAK'ATIDN SILNL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS REC AND THOROUGHLY RENEWED ALL PLW$ END MER WCUYENTS AOPRO.ED W ALL OF THE PERMITTING AMT110RTTE6. - 2. ALL FINISHED GRADES SH -L SLOPE AWAY FROM PROPOSED BUILDINGS AT MINIMUM GRADE OF _ - 2.0%. ALL SWNES SHNL HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2.003. - ]. THE CONITUCIOR SIINL KEEP THE ADUDENT RO AYS FREE OF DEBRIS END PREVENT THE OFF-SIIE RR.RCfGNC OF SOL IN ACWROWCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND ' WATERSHED. ' - A. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT (e00) 252-1166, 1a HWRS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. - 5. ILL IMPROVEMENTS TO CONFORM WITH M OF CHANIM65EN WNSTMICTpN STINDNiDS SPECIFICATION, IAIESf EDITION. 6. ROCK DONS31IILm0t1 ENTRANCES SHALL BE PRONGED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION ACCESS POINS 7. REFER TO GEGIECHNM ENGINEER FOR SOIL CORRECTION REQUIREMENTS AND TESTING 9F REQUIREMENR. ° C�OgH a. STRIP DISTURBEDTO REUSE IMILE ON TED SILT UE SOF ` - - -. pO/' 9. i MEDIfTOPSOIL TER) SDLCDE �RSYALES, OR GREATER) ES LY r / \ Y ( - • / • IQULLOWON OR OTFER ROPi'FR NDDPNDORVE EHGITIEER) SHNL BE Nfp E OvER APPROYID SEED MI END A MINIMUM OF 4- TOPSOL j 961 J2ex / T° TO ALL SN, MUST DING 10. THE GENERIC WENTS. DODLI / \ - CDNTIGIORS CONSTRUCTION, TOR E RINGPLANCONS 5 REQUIRED DURING IF 6 R DION 4FRIFY REQUSULT / ENGINEER O DETERMINE SHOULD CONSULT WITH EROSION CONNiOL INSPECTOR AND ENGINEER TO DETERMINE VMTF CONTROL METHOD. ♦�� DEVELOPER: P GCRPOM1lON 1152W WAYUTAATE SUITE WAY TA,IYN 55191 r / I / I J. F 965.7 976.1. 972.1 n / - T 668.9ef L � / � ♦� m l � l i� rr� .� I / % 'fib r.al ♦♦ BLO i,/ 1 l l D. ♦ y %* / // I I ♦♦ p�:o / - / -� GRADING LEGEND: r by. .. l j r. ItIf EXISTING WMOOR —98R— PROPOSED CONTOLER .L _i01 J PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION DIRECTXIN OF DRAINAGE w YNI( BUT EASEMENT LINE J PROPERTY UK — SETBACK ME LOT LNE RIGI?OF-WAY -. _. ----..--- TREE PROTECIWN UMIS o ID zD m -- - - RE — S SILT FENCE SCALE IN FEET ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MNN 612.758.3099 FA2 viww.allianWnc.com z Z 0 IL Q uj W U 0 W cc Z J a J 0 Q z Z 0 U Z 0 Fn 0 Q W 0 Z Q ui C5 Q Z cc CD Z Q Q 0 I n.ney -0:1, Ina MM NI.P..mommn. o, 10 . a,, . Ny m. n am na.. my CVIgY Lomm... iMi PRQi6S.N- ENGINEER unM Ina M.. of M. me, e1 MINKESGTA MMM PwuYH. PE DUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL DESIGNED: YMR DRA.: YPR %NIER W. 21FDD1B 5 SNEET 5 of 7 E EXISTING CANOPY COVER N 0 15 30 60 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND E "NG CANOPY WO AI E PROPOSED CANOPY COVELtAGE TO REMAIN <�A _ ki 1 HOCK i a„.. ------ www r�ti. Aw A a.aXA ! .ter weyr..-s .a ,ANv aw ,m. o.mrrr-.we Oi4m lss h,®14w, ! r,.,.RAACR,u�K,eY -m aam =s c IF ,ter=L •u 46 ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 Man 612.758.3099 Pnx w .alliant-inc.com J ~Q F m g rn J a w a 9 t F F Z 0 a z __ cc m C3 w y U a WLu J Q 2 LL > ¢ a Z cc W 9 O U } a O U W a cc IL i n.nar =,mh mn ml, Pm,. R1.W c,.v..w 6y my . asp uona.a EN6IXEEA unN. ... ff M, Iona of IF. .. Slal, of wiXXEsare wurx Rruuw. rc DUAETLY ASSUIRANCE/CONTROL RY O,*E DATE ISSUE s-Is-n�rnY mxumu I PROJECT TEAM DATA pL514ME4. MM pMY/N: LLL PROJECT No: nR-Dare 6 sxLn 6 of 7 WOMEN r �% T / % ' On.. / . I D ,o zD Ao SCALE M FEET RFO CFOgR P O/� T AO 7 u7- 1 .a ♦. (II ��F l / / 1 - -J TREE PRESERVATION NOTES: i 6EETW Axr a>x57wmlw m cwnw m uvDnv.oA I'RPR.T s m man A,E2 PRDALpaN RN¢ GCE MA57 RE7 w lexxr tam s6Nam wrN vosrs xo us nAA eiRf a R17 sWu E IxsrN]m Aveuxo nF apv 6wE E xmaom ,wvwc mE Ixm uEs a emnx5 mAs m E INF.sER.m DR n mE IcvwEmR ov mE CRRILLL ,mat 7a1F Ewo vmxa�iw mrwov�w moEirw v�vrE I�ic TM¢ rviif t�wE'r E�Ww� wi¢ urm E�i� a�i•,n�n¢imt� 1Q61AX.lI0X ILIEIY 61EWww1fA 2 Ip aMPNwI. aMINC(CN WRAILS m SaL WY E SIaREa wa1W TE fIR LN6 Cf MY 9MKN1I lE6 m E vEEmw. 1 m DMAGLNFNI. wD I1s76+wxmE anu uLvlE. 1Exawq Awm. fAMPILT]M m ovwE w mx umu7Rr 9p11 Dmw a1nv1 IelaD eEps vWsnwc srAEr.Ns nms ♦ vxmwcmR m ra..v+r nF Gwxx x m asa,W r4a ro mxvurE xwvmlrt r+o 1nANE m mule a imoc Wmw; smx As mDs w vAwIS S pVTVLE WTIEVf6 W TIE 511E 9WL m! CIWIfE lg6mAtBLY GI61XG GLlS11C M9mMYfMK aWIC6 w T1E SdL Rosnxs mwva AIwE 1185 wm Ixfpllfa m E RmSDNm. 6 E.4 LRA4D a1 VIW 59iEwlf lE6 E12 IDf watt® /5 PWf L( TE P61W 1REF MfM0.R. ). Na Sp81W!! IIFFS 9WL E ELaim IMR T61EE M63RMTEN %M 6 M9R'r+ID E TE tltt Cf bVNWffiN. TREEINVENTORY 7 � D1.161M COAOAMAYJA eEADSF e� ROaTHE6 E4snMG eWra s29 24 MVl£ ]8681065 S181s2 m 510 4 SPRUCE ]85963816 538134312 Mr%Ni11Y.aE Sib • SPRUa ]85415961 5381<2rB] x SRRWAW s291 4 WRUa ]85`82571 53R3455R] 1!]r51GxfIMNE Sffi a MIE x a L6D92915 53OTiY.1 uurs FlDIE 5293 15 RR x 15 viEssa]al - 53a WM4 5296 ]a AR F N wsssIW6 s3umur`4 5ffi is AR 1 15 Ea5961513 i3IDaa6P9 5M E2 SNOT x n 1 Ea %MWZM6 529r ]9 aw x ]9 ]as912556 920fi5a1 5216 Is Fla x ]E _ zmas%s55 53aLi55E8 - 52S Is AW x. _.111 ID59W941 53m26]38 SNO ]2 a1RO1 E95913339 53Ra186{ 5Xa 2E MAPLE ]65 OM 53@ 462 53 19 3PIma ]as993269 0827S188 sm aLRH CEDAR Issea is 53828,W6 N1r SONOR(Aar 53 27 MAPLE ] —&479 5=M316 53L 9 ASA x 9 165891791 W140208 M2rSBIR1 w 53Q'. " 9.. MN 1 -4- II54 U7 SH196iE LUf3H16fPMf 5342 12 ASx x 12 19599A35- 53a133a16 Safi u - ASH x 12 I85120E1 53acZSII 53M ]2 RR - -x 2Z 285i5M7. 53Bt9a133 - .. 53% 9 KH ERSMl999 SM4= NTSIVOREAW 5352 12 NNE 186a386'9 53m24556 safe u NNE YS81a173 EMU 56154 53E 8 -ELM ]aSaISB09 53a162.453 I0r36NP01W 5367 6 EW ]a5at3164 Sa31m] MEr5s1NflMW 53® m AW ]BSaEi321 9WJU3® 5369 7 EW ]aSA102 SUEPOS36 IOT56AFIIAW 53A 9 An 111SSDi.6 sa1a4451 1 WNFNAW San Z2 45N 135ML564 53911N 53n u AW Ees7x3i9 s3al9a3as saE9 12 Rra: 165665415 9E1011269 5952 MISN aw 18510963 5MOi1 1O736NFILAW LEGEND 01524 EKi57RlC 1REE 10 REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED Vts2a 1a24 +� DUSTING TREE (OFFSITE) ��■/■ TREE PROTECTION W2175/ SILT FENCE 6 ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612758.3080 weN 612.758.3099 rAz www.alliam-inc.com Z a J a J Z ra 0 r F a m > m w N H w J Q IL a Z J a Z a h Z < y z LL cc 0 EL % > Cc cc Z a 1111 W Z i w u Z U a W a Q R Ir U C F n., o7s, . 7. plan, .p.cV.ea.iun. .rvport d by mao e.. Y oll auP —Won n and that I am aulr O—wel pxaf n.. ENCIxEER ..d.. nw Io.. of in. star. o, WMNESaiA WNt RNRCM. PE 00AIM ASSURANCE/CONTROL a DAn a69YFm Na aaMa! al ptl6r la! 21a-Wla 7 7 of 7 RED CEDAR POINT xxor eat Fatloxsm�sEFl®exrs:Tmr o..+m...wwdm..ubrummw+mn....am.um+g a.w.ewmwn: Naialkv�eb Ra^eYi xb gmNall®L9Hx FHfstl Oaf IrmYmoYbPe Piicbfat�wtlxpd[aryPo ErIrW ltl i!Y mMes seembiifgm b xm�o arm m � pawlowrtl cwmeim, a MamoY mwmm. be mm ues �a b a.b.o M b wtcx qem m iry d sbrm umf wam•.dcemwim Tnm LGUXd OiIF fe Clb cwwwssFx, mxMsoi m tltalmarvn Fwxr.awww +me Marc er u<c+n cw„a m«an �,cr.,�u�a,.n nFm�.w a.i.µemb..+n m.wn.a ua urya m_wm rM qm im mm�M�.m uxa��aM.�..oss srmfsmxmsmm aeae AY W.md. R/NOieM MhmmM MaYw lw COYMfY 911MEYOm fN1V91 CW MfY. MNIl10fP Pear. m Pwtb 9v. lMneaYl.naalF)1. W [m10 E.m B�enFvxe, Wumy $urvryar xY Ilreb miYuimra.Ygrb Pou�bfrwn.f.eae+aarwe®mmYaq+.om ub aYa m_ RYlE6FN6pf a1N R PE(iLSl11FP OFTRE4. GRYEIIEWXIY. MPQlF80T1 TifOtr✓TiR WaWWjetlCM�2m rylhamLCarya tlid FabM. CM1 gWeUMvrweLbrywima IinwY m{wOn.m MiaOamm�.F IlrMmff FaNMldl®�Il fxNlfv MMmh Mtl m .q o'tlad .Ma RmmXNumCv MY- I Oaeb P.pntlwl6 N!Y sdYMlt W waww.a h�rwwCwml6CCP^Y4n: M1llmne N/ 11Rr011w19enlo FPf AYd Nestt ltllb FYlY.m�CnpyYyn gtle W' e'b) M4:Oai mirr�YEOvb WYxewnafYEa4iN mt101446inannnbigmm H lit lan 0®l w atl Y ame2/ ti wM� me IeO:Oa i 0 b. W Y xb wY W, a tri.a b Mev.Y &ab. Sabn Si.M. Sd6 i a q te! qti or�waoa�PobbYim Kq6 PoiwticatYsxetlmwLYW mN[4 LSbf Fi_WrN m_ STA SOf. @9p}. LWMY6 MYYiurrisp�pMcVM ybarrm Os.b6�Nrt.lbm W 9nrye if.rs LLaoMIME Fi NWyRiJt. Lyry. Ftawm YICgmYYm Cgia CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAY 18 2018 a ALLIANT PLAT FILE --REFFRENLF uanww, iOLNO cl. 69fl96 LpNr-- V fiRW -_ xwrx LwE Or m�, or L 1'-NW NP, yG a fplro 4"L Ca LGW,T LY. 8a tp� n' z Nt� _— _ / --NEST LWE 0,,---A enu pSr.Wi LeeE fFEi r— OOIERNIINIr Lor 1 nVIiH T LOT 3 OF ' wvwLAFwr Lou 1 RED CEDAR POINT r'^1�1v'1 �_ \ 1\ \ \ tC \ \ / ---- / R.T. DOC. NO. VICINITY MAP 4LTIOu R T. IW. R. v 33 PGA�'r q'�R °4^ sre Me IH NE 1/4 sw 1/4 SE 1/4 NOT TO SCALE DRAINAGE AND nLITT EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: 1 I I I 5 -1 I I I I I I I p II I 1 p 1 _J _J L L NOT TO SCALE Being 5 feet in width and .dpinlnlot line. and 10 feet in width and adjoining 'gilt of Toy Ines, unless otherwise Indicated en the plot. THE NCRPIIINE GO9ERNMENTLOTh SFCIHYI4 TONNSIdP sl6 NQ9TH. RM'(aE33 WF5r. I50.SSUMEO TO W1Y£ABEAWNG Ci N9P3p51'E, A(SO GHVEH CWN(Y NAGBA(18BBf. Denotes found monument, mer4ed oe shorn O Denotes 1/2 inch s 18 inch it monument set moped by license no. 18425 unless erwise shorn : g /s /- Si Denotes c.r er County cost iron monument found r° = ; --- EXCEPTION ------ % / (DeSLPFm eu CO r N0. 5W AuO 8 NOW PAFI Or YA%[S AOArq'IJ I / 1 / 1 / ----- -,N!wv wFhb --- scar n Net 0 w 80 90 1 WLH - W FEET ALLIANT CITY OF C HANHASSE N Chanhassen is a Comm unity for Life -Providing forToday and PlanningforTomonow Alemorandunt To: Mackenzie Walters, Assistant Planner From: George Bender, PE, Assistant City Engineer CC: Bob Generous, Senior City Planner Jessica Archer, City Building Official Vanessa Strong, Water Resources Coordinator Date: June 14, 2018 Re: 3861 Red Cedar Pt Rd — Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Review City Planning Case No. 2018-10 This memorandum is in response to plans submitted by Gonyea Homes on behalf of 3861 Red Cedar Point Rd. The property owner is proposing to split the property into 2 lots and a variance is necessary to approve the lot split. Eneineering Review Comments Drawing 4 — Site and Utility Plan: 1) Change detail 1006 (Gate Valve and Box Installation) to detail 1005 (Water Service). 2) Add City details 5202A (Bituminous Street Patching), 5203 (Curb and Gutter), 5208 (Concrete Driveway), 5209 (Bituminous Driveway), and 5221 (Tie Card). 3) An abandoned watermain exists between the sanitary sewer and the watermain. Add note to make this known to the sanitary sewer and water installation contractor. Drawing 5 — Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan: 4) Add City details 5301 (Rock Construction Entrance) and 5302B (Erosion Control for Individual Lots) 5) Provide geotechnical report. 6) Include first floor elevation of buildings on adjacent lots. 7) Existing and proposed elevations shall be shown at each lot comer and top of the curb at the lot line extension. 8) Identify proposed soil stockpile locations. Variance: 9) No comments. PH 952.227.1100 • www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on June 7, 2018 the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of a hearing to consider a 2 lot subdivision with a variance for reduced lot width located at 3861 Red Cedar Point Road for property zoned Single Family -Residential (RSF). Applicant/Owner: Tom Gonyea, Estate Development Corporation to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. 7euwissen, Ki TDept Clerk Subscribed and swom to before me this -�L day of , J t 4 , 2018. a" "'1JENNIFER ANN POTTER Notary Public -Minnesota 1 otary Public \ � MY Commission Expim Jan 31. 2W) Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until ' later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. To consider a 2 lot subdivision with a variance for reduced lot Proposal: width. Applicant: Tom Gon ea Estate Development Corporation Property 3861 Red Cedar Point Road Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens W 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the proFect. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2018-10. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact MacKenzie Walters by email at mwaltersCcBci.chanhassen.mn.us or by Questions 8 phone at 952-227-1132. If you choose to submit written Comments: comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to si n up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments. Site Plan Reviews. conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations. Rezonings. Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a Public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any Interested pony Is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are by request. At the Fanning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. available The item well be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission wit does the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, afAmn or modify wholly or pai the Fanning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings. land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezohngs and land use amendments from residential to commeroialMdustdal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Fanning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonrte mosentaeve is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Fanning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Mnutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application well be Included In the report to the City Council, 0 you wish to have something to be included in the report, ease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date 8l Time: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. To consider a 2 lot subdivision with a variance for reduced lot Proposal: width. Applicant Tom Gon ea Estate Development Corporation Property 3861 Red Cedar Point Road Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens W 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the city's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2018-10. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact MacKenzie Questions 8 Walters by email at mwalters a()ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952-227-1132. If you choose to submit written Comments: comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! Clry Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, manned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Weiland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any Interested party Is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request At the Fanning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission wilt dose the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Fanning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commorclalAndusbial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete, Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Fanning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersondrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s), • Because the Fanning Commission holds the public hearing, the Ctty Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to hem something to be included in the report, lease contact the Manninp Staff person named on the notification. TAX NAME TAX _ADD _L1 TAX_ADD_1-2 EXCELSIOR TAX ADD L3 ALYCE FULLER 7075 RED CEDAR CV MN 55331-7795 BERNARD & HELEN LEACH 3830 RED CEDAR POINT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7765 CAROL J HERGOTT 7064 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7795 CHRISTOPHER J MANN 7231 MINNEWASHTA PKY EXCELSIOR MN 55331-9668 CLARA J & JAMES 0 GINTHER JR 7078 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7796 COY O & SANDRA S SHELBY 7068 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7795 DANIEL P MULHERAN 3815 RED CEDAR POINT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7766 DARYL L KIRT 50 HILL ST CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9586 DAVID G WAGNER 3831 RED CEDAR POINT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7766 DAVID M LARSON 3837 RED CEDAR POINT DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7766 DAVID WEINHOLD 3750 RED CEDAR POINT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-9675 EDWARD H & CHERYL A BIXBY 3735 HICKORY RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7769 ELIZABETH J NOVAK 7210 JUNIPER EXCELSIOR MN 55331-9613 GERALD & MELANIE KELLY 3841 MAPLE SHORES DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331-9602 GLENFORD M & SUSAN GALE SHULL 7098 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7796 GREGORY P ROBERTSON 7038 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7795 HEIDI ANN MARX 3755 RED CEDAR POINT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-9676 HOLLY M SCHISSEL LIV TRUST 3851 RED CEDAR POINT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7766 JAMES F & DOLORES LIPE JAMES R MORK JANE EVANS JASON A JERNELL JILL ANDERSON JOANNE T KIMBLE JOSHUA R VAN HECKE KATHLEEN L ROUSAR KEVIN R PROHASKA KRISTI WILSON MACADAM T GORDON MARGO J JESKE 7096 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7796 7044 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331- 7074 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7795 3821 RED CEDAR POINT RD 26485 EDGEWOOD RD 7058 RED CEDAR CV IEXCELSIOR EXCELSIOR EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7766 MN 55331-8335 MN 55331-7795 3861 MAPLE SHORES DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331-9602 3841 RED CEDAR POINT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7766 6424 LANDINGS CT EXCELSIOR MN 55331-9713 7048 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7795 3881 MAPLE SHORES DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331-9602 7024 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7795 MARK A & DONNA M MALINOWSKI 7250 MINNEWASHTA PKWY EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7762 MARK R JOHNSON 3859 RED CEDAR POINT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7766 MATHEW C & STACY M GJETSON 13901 RED CEDAR POINT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7752 MAURICE J & ALICE L LEUTHNER 7085 RED CEDAR CV MICHAEL D & CYNTHIA H WENNER 3801 RED CEDAR POINT RD PATRICIA L RICHARDSON 7095 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7796 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7766 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7796 PATRCCK R GORMAN 3063 DEVON LN MOUND MN 55364-9017 PETER MOE 7161 MINNEWASHTA PKWY EXCELSIOR MN 55331-9667 QUAI D'ANJOU LLC 7028 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7795 RED CEDAR COVE TOWNHOUSE PO BOX 181 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-0181 RENEA MARIE PALMER 7034 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7795 RICHARD H COMER 3800 RED CEDAR POINT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7765 ROANE REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 3738 HICKORY RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331- ROBBY D & SUSAN E SEGAL 3901 MAPLE SHORES DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331-9629 ROBERT E BRUERS 7054 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7795 ROBIN LEIGHTON ROBEY 3840 RED CEDAR POINT RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7765 SEMSCH GALAROWICZ TRUST 7099 RED CEDAR CV EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7796 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 500 LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL MN 55155-4030 TERRY D & CARRIE B CARNS 3911 MAPLE SHORES DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331-9629 THOMAS & MARY MANN 7221 MINNEWASHTA PKY EXCELSIOR MN 55331-9668 THOMAS P MANN 17211 MINNEWASHTA PKWY EXCELSIOR MN 55331-9668 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen is a Community for Life -PmvidingforToday and Planning for Tomorrow July 12, 2018 Estate Development Corporation Attn: Tom Gonyea 15250 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 101 Wayzata, MN 55391 Dear Mr. Gonyea: This letter is to formally notify you that on July 9, 2018, the City Council adopted the following motion: "The City Council approves the preliminary and final plat for Red Cedar Point, and a 10.04-foot lot frontage variance for lot 1, block 1 Red Cedar Point as shown in plans dated May 15, 2018 subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the findings of fact and decisions and resolution: Buildine: 1. Provide a 1:200 "clean" plat drawing. 2. Demolition permits required for the removal of any existing structures. 3. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 5. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 6. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. Engineering: 1. Drawing 4 — Site and Utility Plan: a) Change detail 1006 (Gate Valve and Box Installation) to detail 1005 (Water Service). PH 952.227.noo • YYYIW.BI.Chanh8SSCn.IM.U9 • FX952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 b) Add City details 5202A (Bituminous Street Patching), 5203 (Curb and Gutter), 5208 (Concrete Driveway), 5209 (Bituminous Driveway), and 5221 (Tie Card). c) An abandoned watermain exists between the sanitary sewer and the watermain. Add note to make this known to the sanitary sewer and water installation contractor. 2. Drawing 5 — Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan: a) Add City details 5301 (Rock Construction Entrance) and 5302B (Erosion Control for Individual Lots) b) Provide geotechnical report. c) Include first floor elevation of buildings on adjacent lots. d) Existing and proposed elevations shall be shown at each lot corner and top of the curb at the lot line extension. e) Identify proposed soil stockpile locations. f) If importing or exporting soils for the development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 3. SAC and WAC fees due at the rate in force at time of building permit application. Environmental Resources: 1. Tree protection fencing must be properly installed at the edge of the grading limits as shown on the plans dated 5/15/18. This must be done prior to any construction activities and remain installed until all construction is completed. Any trees lost to construction activities shall be replaced. 2. No equipment or materials may be stored within the tree protection area. 3. One tree must be planted in the front of each yard, as per city requirements. Parks: 1. Park dedication fees for one lot at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval. Planning: 1. An escrow of 110 percent of the estimated demolition costs for the demolition of the detached garage on lot 2, block 1 must be received, and the detached garage must be removed within four months of the approval of the final plat. Water Resources: 1. All permits and approvals must be received from other regulatory agencies prior to issuing permits. 2. Must show existing and proposed drainage. 3. The applicant will need to pay the surface water management (SWMP) fee for 1.010 acres at the rate in force at the time of final plat approval." I have included a list of items that will need to be submitted to the city for the recording of the plat and associated documents. If you have any questions, please call me at (952) 227-1132 or e-mail me at mwaltersa,ci.chanhassen.mn.us Sincerely, MacKenzie Walters Assistant Planner ITEMS REQUIRED FOR FINAL PLAT RECORDING The following items are required to be submitted for recording of the following plat and associated documents: Red Cedar Point ❑ Two Final Plat Mylars no larger than 22" x 34. Do not mark "Official Copy" on the County copy, or the county may reject the mylars. Have county surveyor's office review preliminary final plat Mylars before sending to city. ❑ One, I" = 200' scale mylar reductions of the final plat ❑ One, 1" = 200' scale mylar reductions of the final plat (with sheet names and lot and block numbers only) ❑ SWMP Fee: $8,160.80 ❑ Sewer and Water Fees: 2 924 (Water hook-up: $2,233/unit; Sanitary Sewer Hookup: $691.00/unit. Note: An additional $5,210 water and $1,611 sewer per unit fee will be due with building permit) ❑ Park Fee: $5 800 ❑ GIS Fees: $45.00 ❑ Escrow: 110% of value of garage demolition bid. ❑ Digital copy of the final plat in .dxf and .tif formats (.pdf compatible) in Carver County coordinates ❑ Zoning Letter (If requested, $25.00 fee required) ❑ Variance Document (City will provide) ❑ Resolution 18-39 (City will provide) The following must be done before the plat can be filed: ❑ Current year property taxes must be paid in full and any delinquent property taxes or green acres taxes must also be paid. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2018-10 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 19, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a 2 lot subdivision with a variance for reduced lot width located at 3861 Red Cedar Point Road for property zoned Single Family -Residential (RM. Applicant/Owner: Tom Gonyea, Estate Development Corporation. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the citys web site at www.ci.chanhassen. mn.us/2018-10 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. MacKenzie Walters Email: mwalters@ ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1132 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 7, 2018 No. o a) Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. S was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijkhnnopgrstuvwzyz Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this __L fhdayof 201g JYMME JEANNEFE BARK NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION WIRES 01,3123 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $12.97 per column inch SCANNED CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 05/23/2018 12:58 PM Receipt No. 00379074 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Alliant Engineering 233 Park Ave S Ste 300 Minneapolis MN 55415- 3861 Red Cedar Point Road SUB & Veriance-18-10 ------------------------------------------------------- Subdivision 300.00 Sign Rent 200.00 Recording Fees 50.00 Final Plan 700.00 Variance 200.00 GIS List 150.00 Total Cash Check 54691 Change 1,600.00 0.00 1,600.00 0.00 is -to From: Susan Moe <scmillion(aDvahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, June 17, 20181:31 PM To: Walters, MacKenzie <MWalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: 3861 Red Cedar Point Road Subdivision and Variance Request Dear Ms. Walters, I live on the west boundary of the property that is proposed for subdivision. I have read the materials on the Citys website and reviewed the plot plans and survey. As a resident of a neighborhood with large lots I am concerned that this could set a precedent for dividing other lots if the city is not planning to stick with the minimum lot widths. I also expect the City to enforce all setbacks for the new home and other buildings and also enforce the tree protection ordinance. Lastly, there have several recent building projects in the Minnewashta Pkwy area where substantial quantities of soil have washed onto city streets and into the storm sewer and nearby lakes and wetlands due to poor enforcement of the erosion control regulations. The silt fences and other systems have been poorly installed and then not maintained until the property has been re - vegetated. Thank you, Susan Moe 952 474-2236 7161 Minnewashta Pkwy Excelsior, MN 55331 is -to CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Red Cedar Point Addition Planning Case 18-10 On June 19, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of a Preliminary Plat to Subdivide a 1.02 Acre Lot into two (2) single- family Lots with a variance, Red Cedar Point. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single Family District and the zoning ordinance if the lot width variance is approved. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the comprehensive plan and subdivision ordinance. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Fes: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate storm water drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. C. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets. 8. Variances. — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The intent of the zoning code's minimum lot width is to ensure sufficient space for a building pad that can accommodate a house and garage while meeting the district's 10-foot side yard setbacks. The proposed lot width of 79.96' is still able to accommodate the 60-foot by 60-foot building pad required by ordinance. Additionally, property has an existing house which is configured in such a way as to accommodate a home and garage within the side yard setbacks. Due to the presence and configuration of the existing home the requested variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: In order to comply with the minimum lot width stipulated in the zoning code, atypical lot configurations would be required. These configurations would result in unnecessary public right of way dedications and increased impervious surfaces within the shoreland management district. The applicants proposed lot dimensions and use for the property is reasonable and would be permitted, but for the reduced lot width on block 1, lot 1. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The existing lot was created prior to current single-family residential district zoning standards. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: Granting the variance would allow for the property to be subdivided in a manner consistent with the neighborhoods existing development pattern. Multiple properties in the vicinity do not meet the district's minimum lot width. Additionally, several of the proposed alternatives that would not require a variance would result in a subdivision with features that are atypical for this neighborhood. f Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 9. The planning report Planning Case 18-10, dated June 19, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the preliminary plat for a 2 lot subdivision, and a 10.04-foot lot frontage variance for lot 1, block 1 Red Cedar Point as shown in plans dated May 15, 2018 subject to the conditions of approval. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 19'b day of June, 2018. CHANHASSENrE, ING COMMISSION BY: — Chairman g:\plan\2018 planning cases\18-10 3861 red cedar point rd subdivision & var`5ndings of fact (approva]).doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 06/18/2018 11:19 AM Receipt No. 00380823 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Bauer Design Build, LLC 14030 21st Ave N Plymouth MN 55447- 8077 Century Blvd- Control Concepts Planning Case 2018-11 ------------------------------------------------------- Site Plan Review 1,115.00 Sign Rent 200.00 Recording Fees 50.00 GIS List 15.00 Total Cash Check 018043 Change 1,380.00 0.00 1,380.00 0.00 �c�NN�4 I�N 1_ a N 00 >1 0 3 a a3 0 U 00 r O O 00 0 0 i7 / W a Q / 00 r 0 0 00 00 0 N X ai E .a C �3 0 20 40 SCALE IN RED CEDAR POINT CHANHASSEN, MINN ESOTA It / jiL7_- / BLO K/ 1 It; -_J 80 _. FEET tht ay 0 innew @� SMITHTom LA. Z. u: fi n c � CRESTMEW C ��i� iI 0R. � MAPLE � w 95. COUNTRY OAKS DR. O{EIPLLCAEN CT. STRAW LA. RACE Lake WHITE s SIRAIFORD LA. - P eEOA§� Minnewashta KINCS� RD. ed Cedar Poin =o/`" R' x 0 Ku.a a' Tamarack Lake.T.. Y9 < PROJECT LOCATION 5` � DW U. OF M. i LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM 81. BLUE JAY OR. 82. AUDUBON OF. CIA, Ft 83. TEAL OR. QQy i 84. PARTRIDGE CIA, Ct. 85. WHITETAIL RIDGE CT. �! 94. MOLINE CIA. 96. PHEASANTOR. 41 (•f P I Tq"gO� s CONGACM S 44� q OR. SaJ Sq I58. COACH CT. 171. GI ARBORETUM MLLAGE GR. 159. COACH LA 172. Q ARBORETUM VILLAGE PL. 10, COACH PL 173. MLLAGE PL ARBORETUM VILLAGE U., 161. 174. ARBORETUM VILLAGE CV. 162. MLLAGE ST. 163. COACH DR. �VNeODTU� �.. pQs 78th ST. 175. VILLAGE CIRW 175. VILLAGE CT w In !A �/ 177. VILLAGE LAB 1 "�DRETOW ` 137. CONEFLOWER CURVE 138. BLUEBONNET BLVD. 139. PRIMROSE PL 140. LADYSUPPER LA. 141.. BUTTERCUP CT. 142. SNAPDRAGON DR. 143. HARVEST WAY 144. AUTUMN RIDGE AVE. VICINITY MAP SCALE: I'I=2000' SHEET INDEX NO. COVER SHEET I EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT 3 SITE AND UTILITY PLAN 4 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 5 TREE CANOPY COVERAGE PLAN 6 TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN 7 PJNMO DEVELOPER ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 15250 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 101 WAYZATA, MN 55391 PH: 612-990-0666 CONTACT: TOM GONYEA EM: tom@landmn.com CONSULTANT ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC 233 PARK AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 PH: 612-758-3080 FX: 612-758-3099 ENGINEER MARK RAUSCH LICENSE NO. 43480 EM: mrausch@alliant-inc.com SURVEYOR N DENNIS B. OLMSTEAD LICENSE NO. 18425 EM: dolmstead@alliant-inc.com CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAY 18 2018 WMEN PLANNING DEPT ALLIANT ENGINEERING 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MAIN 612.758.3099 FAx www.alliant-inc.com F— z_ � o O `d Li.l a Z Z W :2 L,II W U N a a U I hereby certify 1 specification, or prepared by me direct supervisior am a duly Licen PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE r z LL l� W w a x Z Cl) 5� cr Uj LLI a (U hat this plan, report was or under my and that I led GINEER under State of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 218-0078 E SHEET 1 of 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION -' ,---REFERENCE MONUMENT i / - FOUND CARVER N89030'54 "E 698.98 -_ COUNTY C.I.M.. -�- - The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the Count of Carver, State of Minnesota, and it described as follows: 670.00 / That part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, -- NW COR. SEC. 8, ^ 3 described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 8; thence North 89 degrees 19 T. / R. 23 FOUNN D CARVER F "0I o minutes 20 seconds East alongNorth line of said Section a distance of 670.0 feet; thence South 7 degrees 49 I COUNTY C.LM. minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 720.0 feet to the centerline of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 66 ILO 2 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline a distance of 222.0 feet to a point distant 576.4 feet o ti h Northwesterly of the East Line of said Government Lot 1, as measured along the centerline of said Red Cedar o d Point Road, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described, and which point is also the Northeasterly corner of that tract of land described in the first description appearing in Book 51 of Deeds, "i Page 884, office of the Register of Deeds, Carver County, Minnesota; thence continuing South 66 degrees 51 n minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline of Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 197.0 feet; thence South 13 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 254.25 feet; thence North 77 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 211.69 feet more or less to the Easterly Line of said tract as described in said Book a 51 of Deeds, page 884; thence North 16 degrees 42 minutes 50 seconds East along said Easterly Line a distance of 292.17 feet more or less to the actual point of beginning and there terminating. Excepting therefrom that part h�M�5u5 I INV-940.20-E(P) taken for Red Cedar Point Road. e0 Q•./ G / \ Except all that part of the above described land lying Easterly of the West line of the tract of land described in S__ - \ I Certificate of Title No. 5187, Files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota, which tract of land is described as follows: ` I \ \ All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 8; thence east on the North Line of said Section a distance of 670 feet to the center of Glencoe Road; thence South 8 degrees 56 minutes West along the center of Glencoe TNH=9sa.as - - - Road for a distance of 713.4 feet to the intersection of the center line of said Glencoe Road with the center line of r r r / , r r A / / \ Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 65 degrees 56 minutes east long the center line of said Red Cedar Point - \ \ I L _ L L - L / / 1 / 1 � / � / v L _ Road a distance of 619 feet to the initial point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 33 degrees cFNTt F'Ql/NF OF C �FFSTFR 25 minutes stance of 0 thence rees 00 minutes ta 0e to a point; aonl i6 k I RN�F/i' \ hencenortheasterrl a line having a bearing of North degrees 110 minutes east distance of 273.77 feet; OF/Fo 19 -- CFO FOFFo /oF yF/FF\ more or less, to the center of line of said Red Cedar Point Road; thence southeasterly on the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road qR J (�/A - \ 7QF->;� a distance of 224.17 feet, more of less, to the place of beginning, all in Carver County, State of Minnesota, excepting that part taken for the said Red Cedar Point Road. ---------------------- WEST LINE OF r.----- GOVERNMENT LOT 3 ,�vT pFR STR \l .. � 1 !� \� 962.85X X963/63.23 \ X963.30 5292'.,� 8" PINE Off: Leh O �O� R Q Q) Cb 0 <v 17 I //-, I //♦ l I / F-- I HI1 ../I \ VI/ I\/l !Ll--- I I\ V I I / "' CS 62 4 963.61963 54 961) 961. 959. I F- rA I A A (- A -/-958.92X 9 V L X964.73 r963/28 �� 23 vg �'--... / / X9634 /.' 19/ SPRU t\�+.Y n, \ 5291 4" Sp@�66.71 �96530\ \,\ / / z- 964,04 5303, 96590 1 RIM= 9 \ \ 14i / BUSH"CER(965.06 T 965,/.. ., v7 965.69. - / W0 C5.=966,25 966.10 X. 62j _ E 45289 L966.48. 4' SPRU 966.61J 5295 i.1-7-, _ 15' RR 967.19-XJ 66,,3 `-��`�' `- �1�768 X� 12.7 X967.25 `�� X968.13 --- 4.82 X968.93 972.2 966 X 6.91 2301M N 9671 7 ,eIR X967.52 / X 969.14 / ///��\�//{\■� \ 968.77X96755 \ 1 / .57 ;ARAG 968.30 / Xr 09.29 / Rio o/ 70.'970.68 X/-9 X971.01 358 968. SO F7 / 71.10 WAL 1 5300972. / 71.08X97 971.08 - 12• ERR X972.�9 , FENCE' 52 971.49 RISERS / \ 1971.5 GX / 1 /. 1 L L X971. 973.27 X973.4.4 973.48�X 973'71/ - _ c 798 X972.7 X9 3.5 /,� 207 QU \ 596 I CED (�"973.529 5 97 am. 1 4 2� � 97�r47 m /cTWO R S RS- 964.9 9" ' 10' • H --- TH RISERS- E 5234A. X96 .88 X968.95 WOOD N 1.87 RISERS / 9 971.92 ) 5342 12" ASH 53 9 27' MPL '''��...��,,,"""��- - Xyv61.90 12' 7.26 - 5339 '96? - 59,31 �gQQ 5357 X 2X966.93 56* 8 9 67.96 X968.59 "9�O 970.86 / 1 I- / X961.07 / / ♦ / I. 12' PINE 6 12' 8' X955.26�,.___.._-7tyoa�5 536 367. R963" S s�`�370 3 /. (i I / 'ASH s RX 00 i 68 ti h REBAR 5: �O 3W \ 7' ELM 5369 X953.18 \� 94 INC 953.14X /V78 °D4'Os,.YV %7. (7'8 Q ?// 6 -j (DEEP /. • FD lP 953.27 X953.31 1 t -- / �--- A POINT DISTANT 1093.4 FEET ------ 570 ------- i �'� NORTH OF SOUTH LINE OF �\ - GOVERNMENT LOT 3 V 14" X EM i 97 .97 7z.sz�C X�97a.Iz / / I -STORY WOOD C O 71 9� - RETAINING WALL I FRAME HOUSE ORCH I FFE=974.20 11 1,327 SO FT ___ 71'. v 971.50 I N -------__` / D 1969.34 M / 9..47 _• I / h J 1 968.40 /ry - RETAINING 96 .46 �. `' �\ / / 5452 _ ry968.87/ h ��___. EXCE/.Q . l T l of V--------' / / BUSH' CED- / 957.99 4/ N 7 (DESCRIBED IN C. 0. T. NO. 5187 AND h967.76 I NOW PART OF SEARLES ADDITION) I. / \p ti /� TAINT p I j cj \ ------1�-/ , I I l , , , , , I I I \ l 6 X966.93 1 L / L / / / / \ / / v B CUL RT `'�^ / 965 A� a I962.08 / ssa.46 -1 1258.91 FDiYZ 0.6 NW .'------- - S88"42�54"W 166.90 �J ` X954.03 Torrens Property Torrens Certificate No. 37556.0 NOTES 1. This survey and the property description shown herein are based upon information found in the commitment for title insurance prepared by Custom Home Builders Title, LLC as issuing agent for Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Commitment no. HB-37163, dated April 15, 2018. 2. The locations of underground utilities are depicted based on information from Gopher State One Call system for a "Boundary Survey locate". The information was provided by a combination of available maps, proposed plans or city records and field locations which may not be exact. Verify all utilities critical to construction or design. 3. The orientation of this bearing system is based on the Carver County coordinate system NAD83(86). 4. All distances are in feet. 5. The area of the above described property is 44,584square feet or 11.023 acres. 6. Bench Mark: TNH on the Northwest corner of the intersection of Red Cedar Point Road and Red Cedar Cove has an elevation of 964.49 feet. Datum is assumed. 7. Survey related exceptions set for in Schedule B, Section Two of the title commitment. Terms and conditions of Easement in favor of Village of Chanhassen, as created in document dated February 28th, 1973, filed April 23, 1973, as Document No. 18336. • FOUND IRON MONUMENT A AIR CONDITIONER. EM ELECTRIC METER ©M GAS METER SO SANITARY MANHOLE Q CURB STOP ® ELECTRIC BOX MAIL BOX © CABLE BOX -o- POWER POLE GUY POLE x817.01 SPOT ELEVATION " (P) PLAN ELEVATIONS DECIDUOUS TREE 0 CONIFEROUS TREE �I 0 15 30 60 1 �Y SCALE IN FEET LEGEND c GAS D SANITARY SEWER » STORM SEWER WATERMAIN E UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ou OVERHEAD UTILITY X FENCE FENCE [�� CONCRETE GRAVEL SURFACE BITUMINOUS SURFACE ,m ,e 0- 00 N N I DO O N Lri T 0 ✓T 3 a 7 N co n O O DO N C 0 C U U 1 C U, N X a� T 0) L 7 00 O O 00 00 N X Q) 0 C C 0 L 0 :: 00 N N I 00 0 N iri 0 3 �o 0 a N L Q 00 I-- O O Ib O 0 c LL s U) c 0 a 00 O O 00 00 0 N X ai E 6 C c 3 6 0 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET Z A • PARCEL AREA TABLE PARCEL AREA SF AREA AC B1-L1 20,417 0.469 B1-L2 23,572 0.541 ROW 595 0.014 TOTAL 44,584 1.024 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: I I I I 5 I I � I I I --5 o i i o I I NOT TO SCALE Being 5 feet in width and adjoining lot lines and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines, unless otherwise indicated on the plat. LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE — - - RIGHT OF WAY - - - - - - EASEMENT LINE -- - - SECTION LINE DRAINAGE AND �__- - _� UTILITY EASEMENT • FOUND IRON MONUMENT ALLIANT ENGINEERING 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MAIN 612.758.3099 FAx www.alliant-inc.com J Q H H Im qH a J Z Z o u' O LU a a 0 Z Z w Iz LI N 2 2 U a J J Z W W Qcc It U a a I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 218-0078 3 SHEET 3 OI 7 00 WATER Tyler No. 6860 Mueller No. H-10361 Bibby -Ste -Croix No. B-5160 DROP LID Grade Tyler No. 6860 26" Mueller No. H-10361 26" Bibby -Ste -Croix No. V8502 27" TOP Tyler No. 58 14" No. 59 18" No. 60 24" Mueller No. 58 14" No. 59 20" Bibby -Ste -Croix VB520 No. 57 9" VB521 No. 58 14" EXTENSION VB522 No. 59 20" VB523 No. 60 26" Tyler No. 6860 65" Mueller No. H-10361 65" Bibby -Ste -Croix No. VB516 60" Valve and Box to be L BOTTOM plastic wrapped per C\�L section 2.03a BASE 7.5' Minimum cover required over top of water main. -Provide Valve Stem Risers To Within 4' Of The Surface If The Distance From The Top Nut Of The Valve To The Surface Is Greater Than 8'. Adjust top to 3/4" below grade. Box to be set to provide 12" of adjustment. Tyler No. 6860 Mueller No. H-10357 Bibby -Ste -Croix B-5001 Gate valve box, screw type, 3 piece, 5 1/4" shaft, size G box, 7'-6' extended, #6 round base - Gate Valve Adapter: 1/4" Steel With Protective Coating, 1/2" Rubber Gasket Installed Between The Gate Valve And Gate Valve Adapter. Clow, Mueller or Approved Equal Resiliant Wedge Valve Conforming to AWWA L C-509 Standards With Stainless Steel Nuts & Bolts and 2" T, Bronze Operating Nut. 8"x8"xl6" Concrete Block W10F TYPICAL GATE VALVE AND BOX INSTALLATION REVISED: 3-16 PLATE NO.: FILE NAME: G:\ENG\SPECS\1006 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1006 CL PL VARIABLE I I a METAL TEE POSTS INSTALLED FROM INVERT TO 3' ABOVE FINISH GRADE TOP 6" PAINTED GREEN. OVERLAP ON TEE POSTS— a WYE PLUGGED END- V) �45 DEGREE BEND N 6" PVC SDR-26 PIPE MIN. SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT w SERVICE MARKE 1/2 PIPE DIAMETER MIN. (SEE NOTE #2 SANITARY SEWER GRAVITY MAIN NOTES: 1. SOLVENT WELD ALL JOINTS. (NON GASKETED) 2. WHEN SANITARY SEWER SERVICE IS NOT ACCOMPANIED BY A WATER SERVICE IN THE SAME TRENCH, INSTALL A HEAVY METAL TEE POSTS FROM INVERT TO 3' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND PAINT TOP 6" OF POST FLORESCENT GREEN PAINT. 3. CLEANOUT REQUIRED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY IF DISTANCE FROM MAIN TO HOUSE EXCEEDS 90 FEET. 4. ALL PIPE SHALL BE BEDDED ON GRANULAR BEDDING (3149.2-F) OR COURSE FILTER AGGREGATE (3149.2-H). Cfff OF TYPICAL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ( LESS THAN 16' DEEP) REVISED: 10-16 PLATE NO.: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2001 FILE NAME: G: ENG SPECS 2001 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET REMOVE AND REPLACE PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY FOR SERVICE INSTALLATION. PAVEMENT SHALL BE REPLACED WITH EQUIVALENT PAVEMENT SECTION \ \( /p� . (C SAN WYE f2+56/r� EX. 8" PVC SANITARY IE 0 MAIN ±948.93 IE ®R/W 950.1/ 90'� EX. 10" HDPE WATERMAIN SEX. SANITARY AND WATER SERVICES FOR LOT 1 TO REMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY AND WATER SERVICES FOR LOT 2 / CBE 61.5 SAN.-6" PVC SDR 26� 90, / WAT —1" TYPE "K" / v COPPER 1g961/ i —EXISTING GAREAGE / TO BE REMOVED / MIN IE 951.9 69.44' 1 EXISTING HOM� TO REAMAIN ! 2 i / SAMPLE / FOOTPRINT / R 1 1pR,O'T'E vL0 K/ y CT EXISTING � RETAINING WALL EXISTING PORCH AND / DECK TO BE REMOVED / SITE PLAN DATA: GROSS AREA ROW DEDICATION NET BUILDABLE AREA PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS NET DENSITY EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING 1.024 ACRES 0.014 ACRES 1.010 ACRES 2 1.98 UNITS/NET ACRE RSF - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT RSF - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT EXISTING LAND USE RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY PROPOSED LAND USE RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY PROPOSED MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK 80.75 FT (LOT 1) PROPOSED MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK 90 FT (LOT 2) LOT DATA TABLE 60' x 60' MINIMUM PAD AREA SETBACKS * ALLOWABLE ** BLOCK LOT (SF) -------- IMPERVIOUS FRONT REAR (SF) 1 1 20,417 30 30 5,104 1 2 23,572 30 1 30 5,893 * SIDE SETBACKS, SEE TYPICAL LOT DETAIL ** 25% MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS/LOT PER CITY OF CHANHASSED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS EASEMENT 0 0_, Sf------------ 1I 30' FRONT SETBACK LINE 15 F - FULL BASEMENT I I w - WALKOUT I W I Iw h I ZI iv I� cYi �l DENOTES PAD AREA � tN NI 0I of SAMPLE FOOTPRINT L I `-- I 30' REAR SETBACK LINE I DENOTES TYPICAL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY 51 5 EASEMENTS UNLESS L-----------J OTHERWISE SHOWN N ON THE PLAN. TYPICAL LOT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE LEGEND: -- - - - - -- EASEMENT LINE BUILDING SETBACK PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE ROW EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY EXISTING GAS - EXISTING SANITARY SEWER -- EXISTING WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN UTILITY NOTES: 1. EXISTING UTILITIES, SERVICE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO L / / _ / / CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 3 ENGINEER UTILITY WORK WITHIN THE R.O.W. SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN 4. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ANY UTILITY WORK. 5. PROVIDE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL IN COMPLIANCE WITH MNDOT 'TEMPORARY TRAFFIC / CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS -FIELD MANUAL" LATEST REVISION, FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION WITHIN PUBLIC R.O.W. J 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE SEWER AND WATER DEPARTMENT 24 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY PUBLIC SEWER/WATERMAIN CONNECTION. I ------- 7. SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CITY OF CHANHASSEN SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. B. WATERMAIN SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CITY OF CHANHASSEN SPECIFICATIONS AND - - DETAIL PLATES. 9. TYPICAL LOT SERVICES: SAN - 6" PVC SOLVENT WELDED SDR 26 (SEE DETAIL 2001) WAT - 1" TYPE "K" COPPER (SEE DETAIL 1006) ALLIANT ENGINEERING 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MAIN 612.758.3099 FAx www.alliant-inc.com I"' Q o _Z O to W IL Z Z a W W 1n C.)a Z W c a U I hereby certify tl specification, or I prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licens PROFESSIONAL EN, the laws of the `. MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE Q W J Z J 5 a Q Z p Z w a LW 1"' v5 tat this plan, eport was >r under my and that I ed ,INEER under fate of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 218-0078 SHEET 4 Of 7 Ch co N N I co 0 N L a 0 3 �o 0 (7) 00 r 0 0 00 O O C Li In C 0 a 00 r- 0 0 00 00 0 N X 4j E 0 C 01 C 3 0 O 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET / r z9fi1 72ex 96"- f �� D, e % t -�64-- ar —� . SPRW'- / ' 0 5303 \\ _SPRU BUSH" CEO Ply- 9 66 �o > -/ - --sPRw � - - - - �. , ' o& / x9 sEe9 +A 968 53p1 MP i / - / 1 �,(05300 1 9j0 ca2 �- , �♦ / 2 5 / 965, 3' 1 �� a/ 1\ / / / 976.1 ex / prop) GFE I W / / 9 (5 STEPS)'/ ' / 920 / 1 9-6&9ex' ♦ Sn i ! / SF � PRE / �� ♦ �rn / 1/ON�� 27" MPL Ili -� ♦�qR g68� / p E 5339 / I---�.11,� BUSH" CEO / / SF PRE 5 I / UI 9" ASH ♦� \ /RETAININC INAIL le / ♦♦ \ / / / i 5357 �Iz" FIRE / �� ♦ / �I� ♦ 8" LM / 27' ASH-96 6„ ., ♦ �/ j F 12" PIN _ 20" ASH a / j 9°7 PINE 7' ELM 0 r / \ � 4_ \ 95\� GRADING NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY ALL OF THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 2. ALL FINISHED GRADES SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM PROPOSED BUILDINGS AT MINIMUM GRADE OF 2.0%. ALL SWALES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2.00%. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE ADJACENT ROADWAYS FREE OF DEBRIS AND PREVENT THE OFF -SITE TRACKING OF SOIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND WATERSHED. 4. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, AT (800) 252-1166, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. ALL IMPROVEMENTS TO CONFORM WITH CITY OF CHANHASSEN CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS SPECIFICATION, LATEST EDITION. 6. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION ACCESS POINTS. 7. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR SOIL CORRECTION REQUIREMENTS AND TESTING REQUIREMENTS. 8. STRIP TOPSOIL IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. REUSE STOCKPILE ON SITE. STOCKPILE PERIMETERS MUST BE PROTECTED WITH SILT FENCE. 9. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING GRADING OF (3:1 OR GREATER) SIDE SLOPES AND DRAINAGE SWALES, WOOD FIBER BLANKET OR OTHER APPROVED SOIL STABILIZING METHOD (APPROVED BY ENGINEER) SHALL BE APPLIED OVER APPROVED SEED MIXTURE AND A MINIMUM OF 4" TOPSOIL. 10. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST DISCUSS DEWATERING PLANS WITH ALL SUBCONTRACTORS TO VERIFY REQUIREMENTS. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHOULD CONSULT WITH EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR AND ENGINEER TO DETERMINE APPROPRIATE METHOD. DEVELOPER: ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 15250 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 101 WAYZATA, MN 55391 GRADING LEGEND: FRONT OF PAD 959.3 GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION N, HOUSE TYPE LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION 950.3 957 REAR ELEVATION Sy - EXISTING CONTOUR 789 PROPOSED CONTOUR k PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION x62.44 .OiblA �2.00% DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE W WALK OUT — — — — — — — EASEMENT LINE PROPERTY LINE — SETBACK LINE LOT LINE - - RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE PROTECTION LIMITS PRE SF SILT FENCE ALLIANT E N G I N E E R I N G 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MAIN 612.758.3099 FAX www.alliant-inc.com F- z F- o 0 N w a z z ol: 0 w W U N a G z W oc a I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licen: PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE z a. J O U z M O W O //�/ V/ W J z a a J W a ILj z U.z a a � Z 0 C z G w a a 0 iat this plan, -eport was or under my and that I ed "oINEER under itate of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: MPR PROJECT NO: 218-0078 7� SHEET 5 OI 7 a 0 N I 0G O N Ln T O 3 N N 00 I` O O 00 6 0 c iT / m N c _0 a. 00 ll O O cc03 EXISTING CANOPY COVER N 0 15 30 60 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND EXISTING CANOPY COVERAGE ®PROPOSED CANOPY COVERAGE TO REMAIN �La,§ �vg 5 S 4 - AI g 6 fi0 ASH 7- ELM, 12 ASHIV " 5369 .a e - \ 3 - �6a %4 Description percentage Square Feet Acres A Net Site Area (excludes wetlands and Ded R/W) 100% 43,939 1.009 B Baseline Canopy Coverage 42% 18,604 0.427 Required Minimum Canopy Coverage 35% (Low Density Residential) 15,379 0.353 D Proposed Canopy Coverage 36% 15,688 0.360 Difference between Proposed Canopy E Coverage & Required Canopy Coverage -309 -0.007 :D-C F Required Woodland Replacement Canopy Area = E' 1.2 -371 -0.009 Trees Required for Reforestation = No G F/1,089 sf (Each New Tree = 1,089 sf Reforestation -0.34 canopy) is Required ALLIANT ENGINEERING 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MAIN 612.758.3099 FAx www.alliant-inc.com H Z a o O LL' W a Z z w W U In a i0 z W a U I hereby certify t specification, or prepared by me direct supervision am a duly Licem PROFESSIONAL EN the laws of the MINNESOTA IMARK RAUSCH, PE J Q m Z Cn a F- a a J � Q W Z > _ LL U a O a Z Z U W W a hat this plan, report was or under my and that I ;ed GINEER under hate of Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 218-0078 6 SHEET 6 of 7 0- N I 00 0 N .11 0 C iT 0 C U Q / CO r O O co CO o' N X 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET / 0 L _ ass S4 \ ♦ \ o Y5303 ♦ SPRU BUSH' CED ; S:. 53 20MP , � Y 0152�00BIR / ♦No � / ♦ ` / / i 1� J/ / / t CED3 / 452 / r `.. i / / i f; TREE PRESERVATION NOTES: 1. BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR GRADING OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IS TO OCCUR, A TREE PROTECTION FENCE (AT LEAST 4 FEET IN HEIGHT AND STAKED WITH POSTS NO LESS THAN EVERY 5 FEET) SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE DRIP LINE OF WOODED AREAS, THE DRIP LINES OF EXISTING TREES TO BE PRESERVED OR AT THE PERIMETER OF THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (WHICHEVER IS GREATER). SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ALONG THIS FENCE LINE IDENTIFYING THE AREA AS A TREE PROTECTION AREA AND PROHIBITING GRADING BEYOND THE FENCE LINE. THIS FENCE MUST REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS TERMINATED. 2. NO EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS OR SOIL MAY BE STORED WITHIN THE DRIP LINES OF ANY SIGNIFICANT TREES TO BE PRESERVED. 3. NO ENCROACHMENT, LAND DISTURBANCE, GRADE CHANGE, TRENCHING, FILLING, COMPACTION OF CHANGE IN SOIL CHEMISTRY SHALL OCCUR WITHIN FENCED AREAS PROTECTING SIGNIFICANT TREES. 4. CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT THE CHANGE IN SOIL CHEMISTRY DUE TO CONCRETE WASHOUT AND LEAKAGE OR SPILLAGE OF TOXIC MATERIALS, SUCH AS FUELS OR PAINTS. 5. DRAINAGE PATTERNS ON THE SITE SHALL NOT CHANGE CONSIDERABLY CAUSING DRASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES IN THE SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT WHERE TREES ARE INTENDED TO BE PRESERVED. 6. DEAD, DISEASED OR DYING SIGNIFICANT TREES WERE NOT INCLUDED AS PART OF THE EXISTING TREE INVENTORY. 7. NO SIGNIFICANT TREES SHALL BE REMOVED UNTIL THIS TREE PRESERVATION PLAN IS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN. TREE INVENTORY Tree PT NO D.B.H. (IN) COMMON NAME REMOVE REMOVE INCHES NORTHING FASTING NOTES 5287 24 MAPLE 186051.055 538152.519 5289 4 SPRUCE 185963.816 538139.342 NOTSIGNIFICANT 5290 4 SPRUCE 185976.961 538142.091 NOT SIGNIFICANT 5291 4 SPRUCE 185990.571 538146.582 NOT SIGNIFICANT 5292 8 PINE X 8 186007.915 538173.341 NOT SIGNIFICANT 5293 15 FIR X 15 1 185980.181 538177.324 5294 10 FIR X 10 185967.846 538178.048 5295 15 FIR X 15 185961.673 538188.679 5296 22 BIRCH X 22 185972.83 538187.216 5297 19 CEDAR X 19 185912.656 538206.581 5298 18 FIR X 18 185935.655 538215.528 5299 10 ASH X 10 185900.994 538220.738 5300 12 BIRCH 185943.334 538281.884 5301 27 MAPLE 185965.005 538295.461 5302 19 SPRUCE 185993.269 538275.188 5303 BUSH CEDAR 185993.16 538286.026 NOT SIGNIFICANT 5339 27 MAPLE 185865.478 538229.316 5340 9 ASH X 9 185891.791 538140.908 NOT SIGNIFICANT 5341 9 ASH X 9 185887.713 538136.484 NOT SIGNIFICANT 5342 12 ASH X 12 185879.025 538133.016 5343 12 `, ASH X 12 185882.071 538142.622 5344 12 FIR X 12 185866.447 538150.133 5356 9 ASH 185847.499 538142.327 NOT SIGNIFICANT 5357 12 PINE 185838.603 538128.586 5365 12 PINE 185818.177 538156.154 5366 8 ELM 185815.809 538167.453 NOT SIGNIFICANT 5367 8 ELM 185813.164 538170.758 NOT SIGNIFICANT 5368 20 ASH 185803.321 538170.363 5369 7 ELM 185792.032 538170.516 NOT SIGNIFICANT 5370 9 PINE 185805.6 538184.051 NOT SIGNIFICANT 5371 27 ASH 185822.564 538188.04 5372 12 ASH 185793.359 538188.385 5419 12 PINE 185885.415 538108.269 5452 BUSH CEDAR 185859.63 538268.81 NOT SIGNIFICANT LEGEND �1524 + EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN 1524 1524 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED �+ EXISTING TREE (OFFSITE) ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ TREE PROTECTION LIMITS/ SILT FENCE ALLIANT ENGINEERING 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MAIN 612.758.3099 FAX www.alliant-inc.com F- t- O N LIJ Z Z_ Z LI 0 <n a z Q 2 U r L D n Q Z LL CZ C J cc a Z Z O LLJ w a in Q M O W Z Lu M F- I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA MARK RAUSCH, PE Date License No. QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL BY DATE DATE ISSUE PROJECT TEAM DATA DESIGNED: MPR DRAWN: ELL PROJECT NO: 218-0078 SHEET 7 of 7 al 0 0 z0 40 e0 W FFET FF„ RED CEDAR POINT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA y� i! 9 s e / d � Q f✓wea e. s♦ ` Lakes // g u i Q 6 1 Minnew°sM1 to fZPp = e;a Cedar Pain s ❑ ® � a yP M � LL• � o 9 PROJECT 10 LOCATION � unosaPc u+awriva a w P VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1-2000' SHEET INDEX NO. COVER SHEET I EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY 2 PRELIIv 1NARY PLAT 3 SITE AND UTILITY PLAN 4 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 5 TREE CANOPY COVERAGE PLAN 6 TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN 7 ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 15250 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 101 WAYZATA, MN 55391 PH: 612-990-0666 CONTACT: TOM GONYEA EM: tom@landmn.com CONSULTANT ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC 233 PARK AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 PH: 6I2-758-3080 FX: 612-758-3099 ENGINEER MARK RAUSCH LICENSE NO. 43480 EM: tmausch@aIliant-inc.com SURVEYOR DENNIS B. OLMSTEAD LICENSE NO. 18425 EM: dolmstead@alliant-inc.com 46 ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 uu+ 612.758.3099 xwc w .alliant-inc.com Nux luuux. rt oat. 00111" ASIa41110E/CONIaOL sxccT I of 7 - AWd'30Y4• `I-nx Cce AC b, r. 116. R 3J AdAO GMER I LMANrY Cl4 F pa R� 7 L I \ m zwxa J KIY .eNx XNav�y, R .Xre'._ ".. XNe-rl sw �W look 4\ \ Xsden 04. \ m 1 X i m X TBAmM' :Spy . a1a B1'l. X1nN- X �w \ L p 4 V C X ypv¢ char, O 11 \ \ Xdnu acnan %mead-x 5' 3hnyr _ Xsd. ns_ o elreare s N.Ili1 r' e 1.. N•! pll-C'Nearch w�s - w,.,n \J9>hJW xma %and -, s�nu, itssr m rt Y1 v _-_-__------ / �xNI.N �� X� x.,N X _ f�c c a_— / -.w C R G /,� / XNN, real ® i rya;Nae'I"' —EXCEPTION---- = / Y Oa• W[ r q 'N�n (4EN/N�ONGQr NO 507AMl x IpW Raw Cf YAPLES A.T.) ry Xaxsz �E-y I / ti I y i i all --- — r �a�AW XffirrN Warracho If X.. Nd«x ".al 17561 X. I X.. / XXRI 0. N 0.8 N�vv_ _ 845w 69_ _ _ _ -- A ROUTDi 051JI4 iTFr NMM6r, LOT LF mvEaNlcxr 3 Xwm LEGAL DESCRIPTION Trre am reroaral ne (:wrnrAnlna Is ¢floated it uN ccunf mCenN. Saba Mmneaoa, and c done ieee Mirolfrocce: TIN INrI of GD.Nrment W 1. Sec9cm 0, Towralrq It6 PMN. Rarge 9 Wet. Cantt CwnH. Mlmriold. tl� as Idbrm: Canmemy al Ne NOMwasl miner M s+C $BClion 0: Henn NDM � tlegrm519 minpa W scinces real adro NarIF line of W Mthe ofermeeo16T0 o Ire!:!Mnw SONoreegmesM dal,dr¢e•L!1s�Ms Welland Ear Mrng h hHIBbe cen!erllne Dr Red 0 font to! Roan: added rince 5764datioe tlegras 51 moves I6 sec0ge cal hone,chinrenbrllnea tli�ldncF OIe,,.. d[loapoi nt saidd5r Car prea My DIN¢ Eat litre o/ cal GMPmmenl Lot I, az meazuAd dlong Ne reMerline of said r Char PWq Roae. HaN pwRCeurglM a loaf phial of CBginnir�g of Lne tract N IaM 96e nexmped, dritl nn:cn are! ¢ a150tlro or ada1nHminerofdrDtract O!lane Couirven In ac lra eescriWon appearing in Bmk51 DIGrens. Page ¢¢a. nedoncMa Rps!eof ohc65. Carver Rod Co Mmnazma: Hence con -of 16oub e. V iraes' 61 ,in. 1015hols Fhal More, ecoseW. ar dia of Ran Gene Pori Ii cr a...IW eaces4 ard. 0 13eag W15 minu!e50p se 1SO Was.atl.rWaoadadefto bet. Hence NOM Rtlegmas42rMD1Y 10 5emfLSd, ,pe roweo.z11.691a1 morewlesa'!o Nad;.ca line Wseao-dcl aeaSctiratl mo BM 51 m DBeea. page eea: marare wan 16 Degree az mbDlas s6 eewreas Eat along sin Eadmny lire. Qum rdxm W han f r hH more or less m!M aTral W im m Mgnnvq ane.M1erehrminatrig. Esspoig tlie'eM1wn IM par! br Rea ceav Poiw RDad. CaWeiaEtlNPMo1517, FO ofRi,or WM Tel EaAMy WNe Wanrmor Na 48h ffIr 0 Rod0 irr asroNo le a rae ND. star. Pua De Rdyatm mrnces. car rer CDmAr. Minna m wnlm o-ea m ra o eamaed aroxOws M Nd. w of Weammen. Wa I, Sedan 6, Toxnstrip I I6.. Rdrga n Wes!. De—e a bMwS' Comma -may MMa NO cdh corner Mend Selion 61 Nance Beal on are Need Gee of said Boor d d'oWxa of 6A feat b To dealer of Glencoe Poad: Nance South 0 degree M minus WeSY Wong Na cal o1 GMr¢ee Road mr a WWnm DI113. oral to bP a eaecPon Nfree cal line of eatl GlencCP Road wM The m1R1Iihe d Red Cepa' Pont Road dNmw S r a recall W annual R lore, be cema Nre or wild RM Cetiv PDim flmd a d:sUnce o161910Br b tIR initial ceint of eegmning Olfly b1M to Ce nasnedd. tfgnce $BURi 33 degr9ae 25 minute west for a n a line pI e, bat mw1B0 Noon W caffeine W minus west docca ce fr a Isof handedo ano,In er. onalinelovingd CBanrg Of NDen16 degmeec moueeastadi to corns r Ino oben: handed ass.e Nedealer. or "'a of sad RMCMar.0 and 1','henR so tf a Toncced,on Ne wnbrli reprl SW Char Point Road a olspr¢e M t2c lr leer. more o11ess. b the place o1 neginnlrg. all in Cans' CounH, Sete W MinrrtsDY. e+upery dN ptt d.en M dp SaN RM Cedar Pourt PDad. Tmrens Proped, TwreneC fpdae Na. 3r 6.0 NOTES I. TNs arms/ w me ProperH aMmvoon snDnn nBrein are IraSaD upon inrwmadon boon in:na wmm.:-e.:.... Co ineara peplM py Cr¢tdn Xcne BuPDers TNe. LLCaisain9 a9e^t br SterveM1TM1e Guatenry Cc�'--�'. LarvniNaY ro. XBJrtp, (l9@d Ppi 15.1dt6. zTM Iv¢Nud v4i159 eretlepedNstlYiMrrmtianly Cell h saneydeal. w®Olwidin of crannionaterch ofcanal a n dsOrdeal concsw W,dece, Wildher, Ia M der, ^a4Einch, M.1..R1.Wv¢rdNrfbn or deral 31TtwwNd drdes[oi9sreram.�mdN.G mAateeretNn NAiHitB6T. 4.Md¢Wxaeseil 6. M arts of Me.Me areal Wool h M.59CW—w w 11 U23 ayes. 6. RNrlr Mslr'. TN mow NIXdNeym'reoarhae.Of,bd.ParelbalWF ICamf 1m siHCNm d964.V kce ONdnbmlarN. r. curve, cancer Nmpro sNr lw in sMedub R, Ser2m Two W the We wmmical Tams NEaaldbedF ru vl heu NYNaeWCtanllaam anaYdMdmnxerc Wkd rWrNy mCl.lRfJ.Fd/p1 t3. 19r3.a� N6W t0338. LEGEND a rOIND I 1110Nl1fflIT A GAS ® MR CONOIPONER >— SMIITARY SEWER ® ELECTRIC METER »— STORM SEWER ® GA5 METER I WATEANNN ® SANITARY MMil —L WOERGROWD ELECTRIC ® C 13 STOP u OVERHEAD UTFUTY ELECTRIC BOx —X P£NCE m NAIL BOX . (YYl`YY1 r£NC£ C CAB.E Box CONCRETE O POWER P0.E -0 GW PQ-E GRAVEL SIWffACE w s SPOT EE£VATION filfEggg- HITUMINOUS "FACE (P) PLAN E ATI0N5 ®/IHx15 TREE MaD [ � 3 CCMF RQ TREE 0 15 30 60 N �® E da N I N LOT J R 11, 0 10 20 /0 SCALE N FEET 11 PARCEL AREA TABLE PARCEL APFA SF ARFA AC B1-L1 A.61] OC89 B1-12 235R O.Set ROW 595 0.01A TOTAL C0,589 1.026 waxmE rao umnr rwseeExrs ME sXowx 1xus. s—. I s xmroavu Nm sYwnwYm.a.ep.ayaum.ie McNm .mvY aelsM M a.q t� .a®al.w® saaemaepa LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE — — — RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT LINE — — — — SECTION LINE E — — — — — DRAINAGE AND f---_.—_—_� U UTY EASEMENT • FOUND IRON MONWENT 1 N—E uMh MW Mla qan. aPatlOavXPn, a npwt w di. Piayane z] n gym . m� ... 4.* J bO une mm a euh ENGIe pXOfE510N/J ENGINEER unJv Ma Iowa o1 M. sMl. a1 YIXXESOTA 3 VIXT 3 of 7 No ]1W ]75 YFirm,m sow IRA el Morm ew s Nn X-IWBI ^ WMTSIrGe1 Ha 8-516p MN . Son Riven LT Mush r 01 m< Surb. DROP�W e Vean<e Fran Tap Nut 01 Thy Vdre To SN"mr, he Owo TIMN a-. j Aayet Icp l0 1/<• eele. T)M No. X9Byeas Bov Ia W wl to Wis Na X-1preNw IY oI beii, wt.No VIPITHsNe 5860 4uMsNa X-1035J SONo Wla wlw ea.. ev<. Iro<. No 59IT 3 e+<e. 5 1/� star[, tize No YueW NN o 56 N o S9 1. 24- 14' TO' G bee. Y-6 ee mM6 R gyna pye bit�Ste-Gd. ♦HS]0 No SO 9dw Iowth I/� Ni521 Hn gB 4' 14' SWt.t. SIM Nlt RatwOn ES)fB�N eB522 No 59 20' cwtIn% In, Rrlpv oe21 Na 60 26' wa<t eutaW 81 The Wle vdw Mq Gate W» eewl.. T/s No 65' H-1INNN NUNb No. N-1QM1 65' Pe.. w BiEY-SIe-Od. No. `R516 6� wd Eq epprpwa Ecum RWlml loo, Vcu < ty ma We to V Cmfmmep 10 AMWA c-soB Sla,evm 1FIh slMMee Mee Nrn ..�[4m zr Gwp�ea a Bob. wa 2' BrMw Op�a1H9 Hul. B53 6'.8'J6' Cm<nla Blxe i EE�W6EWW�Wpp YMEf TYPICAL GATE VALVE AND 80X INSTALLATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT p- 1006 _ 2 q uaeas YFTY TQ POSTS INSlµ{FB FROM NMAr TO S AB0`.E M91 OINDE: RP B- PLAITED DKRM ON TQ NSTs S YrC RM1:O➢ FN0 T tl OOLLF p1D ul MI• M Soo-H PoE Rw SLOPE 17$.A-\P�BRYFNWNTQI �TA PPE W1[1Q1 MM IYF TNTE N) SWURI VEER WWtt YIN NI XIWNi qD 41 JE111S (ROM DA$1E0) a9WN SueneBY YIFR SEND: IS WT ACGON. BY A TIARA SERM<E IN RW $NC TRENOL NI A MGw MEIN TEE POSTS Note IN`NR M E' eWK rebEO WNDE N4 PeNT Ry 6' Or POST N.OIESODIT GREEN PANT. 1 QuEe IT Solve ED . NNYATE NNy erhy, Y cosI PONY . TO NII P4ED5 W LET. NL PK 9ANL ME MSLEO ON GIN I EDDe1G (11492-D Do CdXSE'To, MIe TYPICAL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ( LESS THAN ifi' DEEP) ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ouNt No' 2001 0 10 20 40 SCALE REMOVE AND REPLACE PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY FOR SERMCE INSTALLATION. PAVEMENT SHALL SE REPLACED WITH EOIIVNENT PAVEMENT SECTION / I AFO C�Ogq A �.� pO/POT O 9�1. �E]C Be PVC SNIITMY ED. 10' HOPE WAIERMMN M SANITARY AND WAIEA SERVICES FOR LOT 1 lD REMAIN SAN IlYE 52+56 IE O MAIN 3948.93 IE O R/W 950.1 PROPOSED SANITARY /-, AND WATER SERMCES FOR LOT 2 SAN.-6" PYC SOR 26 WAT -1' TYPE 'K' / / I EXISTING GAREAGE TO BE REMOVED / MIN HE 951.9 / / Bg,M, l , EXISTING HOME) I I / I , I It SAMPLE / / / -___... _ _ _.. _ - / FOOTPRINT / i / 1RFEANIN / BL© Kj/1 / I EWA,_G- I / / RETAINING WAIL I / lI l / I / EXISTING PORCH AND I / DECK TO BE REMOVED / / / I SITE PLAN DATA GROSS AREA 1.024 ACRES ROW DEDICATION O.DI4 ACRES NET BUILDABLE ABU 1.0113 ACRES PROPOSED DWELLNG UNITS 2 NET DE119TY 1.98 UNFISI OGRE EXISTING ZONING RSF - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING RSF - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT EXISTING LAND USE RESIDENML LOP DENSITY PROPOSED IAND USE RESIDENTIAL UW DENSIIY PROPOSED MINIMUM LOT WIDIH AT FRONT SETBACK W-75 FT (LOT 1) PROPOSED MINIMUM TOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK SO FT (OAT 2) LOT DATA TABLE DO x W MINIMUM PAD AREA SETBACKS . ALLOWABLE L LOT (SF) IMPERVIOUS FRONT REAR (7) 1 1 1 20.417 1 30 1 30 1 SJU4 1 1 2 1 23,.972 1 30 1 3D 5.893 • SIDE SETBACKS, SEE TYPICAL LOT DETAL ^ 25% MAXIMUM IMPERMOUS/LOT PER CITY OF CHANHASSED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ----------- , So: rwa sLTwoL urE� I I II I I NAN geva I I, OE I 51 I La _____J TYPICAL LOT DETAIL DDSI LEGEND UTILITY NOTES: T - PAE OVmNrt� _ 1�N Y - YVCIUI EASEMENT LINE - BUNTING SETBCK PROPERTY UNE LOT UNE ROW EXISTING OVERHEAD NTII EXISTING GAS EXISTING SAIDTARY SEWER EItSDNG WATERAINN �- PROPOSED s&BnARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMNN 1. EXISTING UTILITIES. SERVICE LOCATIONS AND EIEVATONS SI BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTF ION. Y. COXTRILTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCITON. 3. NL UTILRY WORK WITHIN THE R.G.W. SN41 COMPLY WITH THE CM 0E CWWW.SSEN ENGINEERING GUIOELNES. I NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE GLLL 48 HOURS IN ADJNICE OF ANY UTTILTTY NURK. 5. PROVIDE TEMPORARI 77011 CONTROL N CONPLMNCE WTM MNDOT 1EMMPORM! TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE IAYOSIS-FlE1D MNIUN" LATEST REVISION. FOR ANT• CONSTRIK:iNNi WITHN PUBLIC R.O.W. 6. THE CONTRACTDR SHALL CDNTACT THE SEWER AND WATER DEPARTMENT 24 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY PUBLIC STWER/WAIERMAN CONNECTION. 7. SANTARY SENFR SERVICES SHALL BE INSTNIID PER OTY OF p1AHHA55EN SPEOFICATIOIS AND DETAIL PLATES B WATERMAN SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CITY OF MANHASSEN SPECIFICATIONS AND DUAL RATES 9. TYPICAL LOT SERVICES: SAN - B PVC SOLVENT W£IDED SDR 26 (SEE DETNL 2001) WAT - 1" TYPE 'K' COPPER (SEE �AL 1006) i` ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612,758.3080 Mau 612.758.3099 FAx W W W.alliarR-inc.conn IA hereby omlo padR<ation, r N we m omrort pNelui duty U<er PROFESAONLL El INe I..s I Mc NNESOTA RARR RNISOI. 1S rJ cr_ C m W Q (L a z g z CL LL F J z o g z J Q W w (L v) hot Ile 'bo Puf e under my aM 1. I r.e QFIEER unam SM. of 0UA)tt A RANGE cows OL DIIANI4 VA. 4 SHOT 4 OT 7 X E 0 10 20 40 SCALE IN FEET GRADING NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSRtUCItON. THE CONTRACTOR SILLLL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS MO APPROJAUS HAYS SEEN OBTNNED. NO CONSTRUCTIGN OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PIabS Me DTHER DOCUMENIS MPROJEO BY ALL OF ME PERUJUMNC AUMORInES. 2. ALL FINISHED GRADES SW SLOPE AWAY FROM PROPOSED BUILDINGS AT MINIMUM GRADE OF 2.0%. ALL AYMES SH4U1- HAVE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2.D0;. O. THE CONTRACTOR SHAH KEEP THE ADJACENT ROADWAYS FREE OF DEBRIS AND PREVENT ME OFF-41E TR 1413 OF SCIL IN ADCORDMCE VIRM THE REQUIREMENTS OF ME CITY AND WATERSHED. 6. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL. AT (BOO) 252-1166. 48 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUnON. S. NL IMPRRrEMENIS TO CONFORM! Wlm CRY OF CHAN ASSEH CDNSTRUCDON STANDARDS SPECIRCA7DON. Uk= EDITION. 6. ROCK CONSTHULmON ENTRANCES SHML BE PROVIDED AT ALL CONSTRUCNON ACCESS POINTS. 7. REFIIt TO CEOTECHNVA- ENGINEER FOR SOIL CORRECTION REQUIREMENTS AND TESnNG REQUIREMENTS. 8. STRIP 7OPS0L IN ALL WURBED AREAS PRIOR TO ANY M1457RUCTION. REUSE STOCKPILE ON SDE. STOCNRUE PERIMETERS MUST BE PROTECTED WITH SILT FENCE 9. IMMEDIATELY F01.1041 GRADING OF (3:1 OR GREATER) SIOE SLOPES AND DMNAGE SWALES, WOOD RHO BLANKET OR OTHER APPRI SOIL STABIUIZING MEMOS (APPROVED BY ENGINEER) SINLL BE APPLIED OVER APPRCNED SEED MI(TURE AND A MINIMUM OF 4- TOPBOIL 10. ME GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST )SCUSS DMATERINC PANS W ALL SUBCgORACTORS TO NOIFY REQUIREMENTS. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCRON. CONIRACIOR SHOULD CONSULT WRH M90N CONTROL INSPECTOR AND ENGINEER TO DETERMINE APPROPRIATE METHOD. N11MINVU11101 1ii ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORAUDN 152M WAISUTA BWLLVMO. SURE 101 WAYUTA MN 55391 GRADING LEGEND: IXISnNG CONTOUR JB9— PROPOsEO CONTOUR PROPOSED SPoT ELEVADON 61.H a OIRELTON OF DPpINM.E W WARN Qua EASEMENT UNE PROPERM LINE SEMACK UNE LOT UNE RIGHT-OF-WAY - - -- - - - - TREE PROmcnON UNTIES PFE — 6F — SILT FENCE ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MAIN 612.758.3099 . �.alliant-inc.com n—.1 a.HIf, .P '.catian. o PnParN by m: al..n .op.r.NM. a &IY oa. PNOEESSIONAL EI In. la.. of M. MINNEsm. YIAK Rw..N. PE Z a J (L J O Q z Z J O a U k Z O V) m O n W a z .J Z a a Q W z O a LL Z a � z 5i z W at m Q a a nut Ina plan r rt . na. • mY and that I .ou CINDER -d.r SIN. of uom.. No. QUANIY AMID MCE/CONTROL fir cm. DATE IME DESIGNED! M:: 5 .. 5 of 7 EXISTING CANOPY COVER u O 15 30 60 SCALE ® LEGEND EJUSTING CANOPY COVERAGE ®PROPOSED CANOPY COVERAGE TO REMAIN A mnAxl sYe C+ua (ae,i .Ti 1R6•Y ll E. Yv,efAF.+n.4ep (m.,R ]9� ISIA OJ9 I�.Dni,eYsy D .D f [ nap,d WmbdAwavv, .l tl LIA9 ...nroti�w ne...Y.w.• 6 YSA.AIunn,.r,�•:mY rr.e v a ALLIANT 233 Park Ave S, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 MAN 612.758.3D99 . www.alliant-inc.com ncy <amry e Y.<xl<c Paia duty ULIhNr s c.. a sessxM Q io of M. m NNE50TA Y Ann n1U5CX. R J ~Q F m 3 y a w J Ur a a J 2 Q w Z 0 LL O _ U cc r y a a O Z_ Z � U J w w w a cc hat ri. Prnn .1Yon m. Y• my ana that r w 61NEER undo SIaN of QUALITY ASSURANCE/CONTROL er -- DATe - DATE ISSUE 5-15-18 Cltt SIIBYIRAL PROJECT TEAM DATA K.I. ED: YPR QeANN: ELL PPoIECT No: z1.-.7e I- U shorn 6 of 7 0 10 2C 40 7T TREE PRESERVATION NOTES: Neds,.x, IOesydu YX OR GWa Of EOPNS` Nel N m Vi]R .,Wl PR01FG141 .FN{ (ATIWT. .LET Ix xEIpIT. BONE. NM PAR 1p LESS; . 5 eE» NMLL 9E ,6T.WID .PoIIxY ,IE CIE IIIE 6 NUCED.RE/5, ME 01® 116 eE ESaTXG 1RFES m E PRY1F£0 ON Ad THE19WEIFA 6 THECm11Gl Ig01 ZWE (Mq&YLA a c1EA1FA). sIM . BE R/® XpIG TH¢ BENS INE ICg11MXG THE MEA AS A TSE PROXLXM! IAF AND KCHIMW fA G BEYOND TIE PENCE UNI m6 iFNCE end" RELVx m PVCE uxm .LLL CRWIG AN- ON sK wr E SlONUU Mlp nG CIE uF5 6' Ntt s06N'Nlf 11655 ro E z � 1 NS ENOpYIEMI. IAEQ BsseaNIEE EAIDE OlW3E..'e, EIILG. CgIP/LIKM Or ClVN3 N SOl CIEE611xY s1N1 oaw NmN ETNfID rNru PROTL7WD ssN,v3T TIXES. 4. Cp11RKme TO d,,EN, TIE WNLE a s]LL CIIEKSN/ DUE TO Credsm wASN]V! NT IFMYS Od'MUFF OF TW0 wTXVS SUCH a E1415 CR PANIS S, ORMWF PATFNa W THE sa, . NO, C%Wi ld6fOdBuy GW41C tlUSOL FNNNINdfK OWN6 N THE SPL IAX'lIME fLN1EN! EIEIE AXES MC NTILF➢ T) E RRSOTID. 6 OF . 18A4➢ Us OIN4 9OiTli1! Tffi EE NT NO UNB AS PM! E TE EffiTW TXE NhMErt. 1. NO sWE1LW! TXES . E NSNhLD UNR T6 ]REF NXEM . PVN 6 AAMx£O By TIE GIY E CWN SILL TREEINVENTORY ieNOT 0.&H.IIHI COMINKXBI E REMOVE1[7 ORTHING FASTING MNLE 0631CSS 981525]9SPRUCESSE1836 ian1' 62 52M SPRUCE I5�6963 R041691 NUTSGNFIGM5211 SPRUCE 8599.'11] 53814650E 529E 8 NNE xR6m1915 8 73341 MF BGXgGM52S 35 HR xR5986181 SO1n 32<529e 10 HR R 8596I846 SafaM 852S 15 FlR XS%1673 S3M8A67952% 22 01flCX XIA.59R.83 SaM. 16S2 i9 CEOAR x85911656 5382065R152% l8 HR R8595655 0__-8ASN X85XQ994 8@zO73853SI BIRCH 8591333e 9B20188<53C1M.WfE 35%SW5 S02954615302SPRUCE SS1269 53827SIR05303 CEDM ism16 SS06026 1GT SGX6IGNE s3EM?PLE Bs%5<7a 53ffi_+931653 ASH X85891791 5381409® ASH x1R58Fl.713 538136484 53QASH xUW9025 88133015 S3aASH x 12 W5832021 GUU42622 53MRR E U Sasasa P/ S8 sane 45H 18Ssd7499 538142327 WI NSNBAV W 531NNE 18583BCJ3 53RI2RSB6 5355 12 NNE 105818177 5381s61S4 53E6 0 Ow USSIS809 538167453 NOTSGNFlGNf 530 8 L EW 135M.. 538170758 MITSGNFlGNT 5368 20 ASH 1B5SQ3321 SaMM363 Sao 7 ELM 18579 D32 53®71516 IOTSGXFlGNf 53A 9 NNE 10586.E dd.: 51 IUTSGXFlGXf 5371 21 ASH ]85822564 5331RB.M 53P 22 AS. 105793359 5381883e5 5419 12 NNE SBS®5415 SMM269 545E BUSH CEOM 1a5..3 5%2E8.8I MTT SGHGGE LEGEND 524 (z + EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN ,sza V EXISTING TREE lD BE REMOVED �1sz4 l + ' EXISTING TREE (OEFSITE) woman TREE PROTECTION UNITS/ SILT FENCE ALLIANT 233 Park Ave 5, Ste 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.758.3080 XNN 612.758,3099 Fri v .alliant-inc.com F Z_ O IL Q Q 0 W U O W Q I n.ner -Hlfr muI mB P., ePedncanon or ANuet P.,rvd by m under mr li—f eup.t., and mm I a duly uaeneed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the l— a1 me St. 4f wHNaaT. mm Llcmx x. OUALnY ASSURIUt /CONTROL By DAre DATE ISSUE 5-15-, 0 CITY SUBYmAL PROJECT TEAM DATA DELONEO: NPR muwx: E1 PROJECT NO: 2la-0070 7 SHEET 7 of 7 RED CEDAR POINT xxow Au vawus er msse v xEserrts MI sn.1. o.,.ae.e�l cpop.m�.. w,.om m,eptla2...,., p m. al,wa,e a�.m omc.m- cwu� d it M. siei. rr d Iwd:o-p d mx .ma tl r n.amal m,.. d nw s.mm a m,m „w cause m. mm m e..,.,q.e w q•� ®� cmw v omm m,a aa. rereer a.aiue m w vmk b wwt u. e. wu. �m w o+w.m,rh .e�es.cpe.de gmwgM n.nmra®Ian tsaaa nw+Cupv4n.. wvrol.mw,.wn. I'a mrees p.®4aeeamelq lap,wdw'a ew taa y llonn L G.ryev, GY BmM CFs STAIE GF V1tE50iA IXMIIT OF mG amu..n..v.e.wm.eem Gd,.m m. p, er M,s Lmgr axw wnwrou p•wrm a, ww a v. m,w.sm. nawaw,. wr.r mew. ro•n..w.m slwvnoascewnmvre i v..: w a.vr.t m a•q p.n a et. qtl w emnme q �. p wmm s a.ev wgtlrtbvr i am. M umm wm s...ro. a am sm d w.®R aw eM t. m,ad mp.vmmn d m. tp.m,Y n.,eA N r mrsnml em.M sees.. pwM am4r+t m e,k em[ wm r nvuiva mdal m se ptl b.. seep p ww m p.mps s.w, u. rr a r w®Gowmrw tlm.w sma a arpt a wwm wu,ltl, stlwn smn+, stet s.. d ew e® d r swew we wo.n wm sewm a r qM .,e r amw •.rs w ro.a sm mwe m ew elm. wmw s ab.rt tb...t IAN sp..s Mmmd.lu,u. W.I&E VAI CaFNYf9piA wwxlrar M Yub,imatnn sfmMaTa Gripe mem OY 0..iB01neW.vlbs.a Wm w^m�✓. MVb Ghns IbYY mew. Gub. GYp�de MIAmWmmf.® auxlwavn wulrtlsorA MWdI®CEWPIOMivipv,V Wtl�mgtlmtlYC Ydtl'e@IdUaI�IN.vYtiv,Vv,,.w•w9 •,seRMIN aqd A .stl Wptlea pnmAw�.nt.poapwdwga�Y51rYv 5edrn S6®. St62 aY rpm, ar d aptlws., sa.�w cawxlr avmnat cnwrm caair, wNIFSOlA s,lw m.w.. wp.Y sw..Yp I l,vlY [vaq.r�egm.w Npbymalmwtanprlbbmamblmtw eY.0 tti tyd S Iei.eMi.mnM1PamMR,ms b REG6 CF 1111ER LNXEfl LOYXR. wNIFSOTA IvseGYmNyamtlb lidd(t]ILE6VIFdwlw b]Ms bYa .M. xl_ecWt M.atr men[NumM L8 PLAT FILE NO R.T. OOC. NO. CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAY 18 2018 F�: ih: r+.71 5 : ,i. �^•i PLAT FILE NH9•JO•NT HHSM 1`-NW GqP, yC d /M. R TJ fGVO Ca.VFEx CONIY CLM y I � € as KJ n N1N LNE a 49tFM l LOT I V�'4�1• �4t'&tr Nf RED CEDAR POINT )-�__-:-��•s/.,__ -ate ...•`, � - -"`_% \ � �K• j / l doh - - __ _ ^ / \ /sot\ , \ / / p �. / I -_____-- / BLOCK I % 1 EXCEPT/ON-----' / / / I � 'Ni iH6L11af!>D N GO.r MS SBl •W 8 / / / / / IHAy NtHr a srAreaz AEIYIH)I) I I / ,NMP y r•I l / / iL__ / ♦ / Pe NW- AH'11'NY' Ie6 eJ Y _ -------- —IESr L/E ti li ' HOYEINENI Lon, J —_ / __ -Ap/rW.1 l r FF£I _y./y__ y' MNM (F SWM .wCf I -% Hpt{NAdNI LOI J R.T. DOC. NO. VICINITY MAP .a. d T. Ild.y W1 HN /4 NE I/< Sit 1/4 % I/4 NOT TO SCALE MMNAOE AND UDLITY EASEMENTS ARE SItOWN T14M: S JIIIII NOT TO SCALE Bang 5 feet F widttl and adjoining ]at lines and 10 Mt in width and ad"pining nghl of way ,has, unless otherwise Indicated N the plat. JNENogrxLAVE aoyvwMENrtoT I, secno'I d Tom/sev nH NDItM, RHA'Li YJ 1yE5T, 15 A41MlDTO WILEABFARHiGOF N�..roJPE ALN fN1YFN LgN1YNALi98 (/B9W. DalatN found mmumalt. marked as shoen O Denotes 1/2 inO H IS inch I. monent at marked 5y license not. 18425 unless ctherwise shown O Denat.H Cana c .ty aazc V. manument rotund Scale F fNt 0 .IO SO 80 I WON - JO FEET ALLIANT PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND FINAL PLAT REQUEST SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE RED CEDAR POINT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA May 15, 2018 SITE INFORMATION Legal Description: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence North 89 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds East along the North line of said Section a distance of 670.0 feet; thence South 7 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 720.0 feet to the centerline of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline a distance of 222.0 feet to a point distant 576.4 feet Northwesterly of the East Line of said Government Lot 1, as measured along the centerline of said Red Cedar Point Road, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described, and which point is also the Northeasterly comer of that tract of land described in the first description appearing in Book 51 of Deeds, Page 884, office of the Register of Deeds, Carver County, Minnesota; thence continuing South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline of Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 197.0 feet; thence South 13 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 254.25 feet; thence North 77 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 211.69 feet more or less to the Easterly Line of said tract as described in said Book 51 of Deeds, page 884; thence North 16 degrees 42 minutes 50 seconds East along said Easterly Line a distance of 292.17 feet more or less to the actual point of beginning and there terminating. Excepting therefrom that part taken for Red Cedar Point Road. Except all that part of the above described land lying Easterly of the West line of the tract of land described in Certificate of Title No. 5187, Files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota, which tract of land is described as follows: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence east on the North Line of said Section a distance of 670 feet to the center line of Glencoe Road; thence South 8 degrees 56 minutes West along the center of Glencoe Road for a distance of 713.4 feet to the intersection of the center line of said Glencoe Road with the center line of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 65 degrees 56 minutes east along the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 619 feet to the initial point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 33 degrees 25 minutes west for a distance of 210 feet; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes west 166.90 feet to a point; thence northeasterly on a line having a bearing of North 16 degrees 10 minutes east a distance of 273.77 feet; more or less, to the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road; thence southeasterly on the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 224.17 feet, more or less, to the place of beginning, all in Carver County, State of Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part taken for said Red Cedar Point Road. Torten Property Torten Certificate No. 37556.0 Address: 3861 Red Cedar Point Road, Chanhassen, MN. 55331 PID & Acreage: 250080700, 1.023 acres Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 1 of 4 VARIANCE REQUEST SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE RED CEDAR POINT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA May 22, 2018 SITE INFORMATION Legal Description: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence North 89 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds East along the North line of said Section a distance of 670.0 feet; thence South 7 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 720.0 feet to the centerline of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline a distance of 222.0 feet to a point distant 576.4 feet Northwesterly of the East Line of said Government Lot 1, as measured along the centerline of said Red Cedar Point Road, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described, and which point is also the Northeasterly comer of that tract of land described in the first description appearing in Book 51 of Deeds, Page 884, office of the Register of Deeds, Carver County, Minnesota; thence continuing South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline of Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 197.0 feet; thence South 13 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 254.25 feet; thence North 77 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 211.69 feet more or less to the Easterly Line of said tract as described in said Book 51 of Deeds, page 884; thence North 16 degrees 42 minutes 50 seconds East along said Easterly Line a distance of 292.17 feet more or less to the actual point of beginning and there terminating. Excepting therefrom that part taken for Red Cedar Point Road. Except all that part of the above described land lying Easterly of the West line of the tract of land described in Certificate of Title No. 5187, Files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota, which tract of land is described as follows: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence east on the North Line of said Section a distance of 670 feet to the center line of Glencoe Road; thence South 8 degrees 56 minutes West along the center of Glencoe Road for a distance of 713.4 feet to the intersection of the center line of said Glencoe Road with the center line of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 65 degrees 56 minutes east along the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 619 feet to the initial point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 33 degrees 25 minutes west for a distance of 210 feet; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes west 166.90 feet to a point; thence northeasterly on a line having a bearing of North 16 degrees 10 minutes east a distance of 273.77 feet; more or less, to the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road; thence southeasterly on the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 224.17 feet, more or less, to the place of beginning, all in Carver County, State of Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part taken for said Red Cedar Point Road. Torrens Property Torrens Certificate No. 37556.0 Address: 3861 Red Cedar Point Road, Chanhassen, MN. 55331 PID & Acreage: 250080700, 1.023 acres Variance Request May 22, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 1 of 3 DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUEST The proposed request for variance from City Code is for permission to allow for a proposed subdivision that includes 1 single family residential lot with a minimum lot right of way frontage of 79.96 feet. The City's Zoning Ordinance for RSF — Single Family Residential identifies a minimum lot frontage width of 90' for standard lots. Design Alternatives The applicant has explored site design alternatives to investigate if there is an option that would not require a variance to subdivide the existing parcel into 2 lots. A total of 3 alternative were developed, see attached concept plans and following descriptions: Concept A: Site option would expand/dedicate additional right of way along Red Cedar Point Road. The additional right of way would be provided with an arc into the project resulting in 90 lineal feet of right of way frontage each lot. Both lots would meet all criteria for RSF zoning standards. Concept B: Site option would expand/dedicate additional right of way along Red Cedar Point Road and create a partial cul-de-sac. The additional right of way would be provided in an `eyebrow' shape or partial cul-de-sac bulb. The resultant lot configuration would result in 90+ lineal feet of frontage for each lot and the lots would have 90 feet in width at the 30' front setback. Both lots would meet all criteria for RSF zoning standards. Concept C: Site option uses the City zoning code definition of flag lot to define 2 new parcels. As conceptualized the existing home would be situated in a flag lot that is designed with a 100' width at the flag start including a 30' setback to the existing home. The second lot would meet the 90' right of way frontage and 90' lot width at the front setback. Both lots would meet all criteria for RSF zoning standards. Alternate Summary Concepts A, B and C show that there are RSF zoning code compliant alternatives to the submitted plan but they would result in less desirable plat options for the City and Applicant. The additional dedication of public right of way in Concept A and B would result in a reduction the taxable land for the City of Chanhassen and lower development fee receipt. The additional right of way either in arch or bulb shape would create the right of way frontage length and minimum lot width at the front setback that the City identifies in the City Code. The Concept B creation of a partial cut -de - sac "eyebrow" would require additional impervious surface in the Shoreland District that could be avoided with granting the variance. Concept C does provide a RSF code compliant flag lot line configuration but the plan creates unconventional lots that could present coordination issues between the future lot owners. Preferred Option Summary Variance Request Mav 22. 201 R Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, AIN Page 2 of 3 The proposed variance request plan does contain one lot (new home) that will meet all RSF zoning criteria. The other lot with the existing home would need a variance for reduced lot width but it would still maintain a width of 80 lineal feet right of way frontage and be 80+ feet in width at the 30' front setback. Both lots would meet or exceed the desired 60' wide x 60' deep building pads or buildable area. The proposed variance would result in lots that do not require additional right of way dedication, and provides a new lot line that is parallel to the existing west parcel boundary creating a typical lot line that is clearly defined for future owners. VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION Check to City findings for granting a variance (pursuant to City Subdivision Code Section 18-22): 1. The requested variance is not being requested as a matter of convenience, but necessary because of the dimension of the existing development parcel. 2. The plight of the current landowner is due to the parcel being subdivided to its width prior to current RSF zoning standards and not at any fault of the landowner. The existing parcel width along Red Cedar Point Road right of way creates a hardship to subdivide the parcel by strict RSF zoning standards for the required 90' of right of way frontage. Non -typical design alternatives do exist to technically create an RSF zoning complaint plan, however, they would have other detriments that are less beneficial to the City nor are as marketable for future lot/home owners. There are existing lots near the proposed subdivision that also do not meet RSF zoning standards for lot width and thus the proposed variance request is reasonable. 3. The condition upon the basis of this variance request is unique to this property. The variance is only needed because of the slight shortage of available right of way frontage for this parcel along Red Cedar Point Road. 4. The requested variance results in a subdivision that would be in harmony with RSF zoning standards and is not being requested for the property owner to use the property in a manner not permitted by RSF zoning standards. The proposed subdivision and requested variance is in substantial conformance to RSF zoning with only one minor exception. The two lots would be consistent with the surrounding residential properties, of which, some are smaller than 90' wide themselves, including the property directly abutting the development site to the west. The variance request also creates a plan that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and results in a land use density just under the City's estimate average demand within low density residential land use. CONCLUSION The applicant respectfully concludes that the request for variance and subdivision will allow for a development consistent with adjacent single family residential lots and the City Goals and Objectives for this area. Variance Request May 22, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 3 of 3 Property Card Parcel ID Number 250080700 Taxpayer Information / - t y a� Taxpayer Name JILLANDERSON DANIELANDERSON Mailing Address 26485 EDGEWOOD RD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8335 Property Address Address 3861 RED CEDAR POINT RD City EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 Parcel Information Uses Res 1 unit GIS Acres 0,97 Net Acres Deeded Acres 1.17 Plat Lot Block Tax Description P/O GOVT LOT 1 DESC AS: COMM AT NW CORN SECT 8 TH N89'E ON N LINE 670' TH S7eW 720' TO Building Information Building Style 1 Story Frame Above Grade 1120 Finished S Ft Bedrooms 4 Year Built 1957 Garage Y Miscellaneous Information School District 0276 Watershed District 1 WS 062 MINNEHAHA CREEK Homestead N Green Acres N Ag Preserve N Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2017 Values (Payable 2018) 2018 Values (Payable 2019) Last Sale Land $156,600.00 $156,600.00 Date of Sale 5/18/2015 Building $149,700.00 $159,900.00 Sale Value $268,000.00 Total $306,300.00 $316,500.00 The date owned herewith is for reference purposes only. This classic hot suitable for legal, eng-heenrgsrveyng or olner simmer pu,osiuc Caner County does hot guarantee the accbacy of tee trio rmalion contained herein. This date is furnished on an as is bass ant Ca^.er County makes no representations or wanrenbes, enter expressed or impired, fo• the marchantapirty or fMess of the information provided for my purpose. This dre,eirnen is provided pursuant to Mimesobe Stalules tilland the user of the data provided herein acknowledges that Garver County shall not be liable for any damages, and by using Nis data In any way expressly waives an claims, and agrees to defend indemnity, and hod harmless Carver CopMy, its officials. officers, agents, employee,, etc. from any and all claims brought by anyone who uses the Infobnalioh provided for here;,,, its employees o: agents, or third padias which arise data,me but of users access. By acceptance of this da, e user agrees not to harromd this data or provide access to it o^ any pad of it to another party unless the user includes wl 1. data a w, of this disclaimer. Wednesday, May 23, 2018 Carver County, MN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 11 % yJ Submittal Date: D PC Date: -1 1 CC Date: -llqllf( 60.Day Review Date: r I u Al 1; Application I ype tcnecR an mac app (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on -site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ❑ Single -Family Residence................................$325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Rezoning (REZ) ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD................. $100 ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Administrative.................................................. $100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts*......................$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: thousand square feet) Include number of ezistina employees: Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_ units) R1 Subdivision (SUB) ❑� Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 ❑ Create over 3 lots ................. ...... $600 + $15 per lot ( lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots)..................................$300 ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑� Final Plat..........................................................$700 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)' 'Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑� Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ❑� Notification Sign (City to install and remove)...................................................................................................................... $200 ❑� Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address ( 50 addresses) ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)....................................................................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation El Variance ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) ❑ Easements (_ easements) ❑ Deeds TOTAL FEE: $1,600.00 Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Subdivision approval for a split of a singel parcel into 2 parcels Property Address or Location: 3861 Red Cedar Point Road, Chanhassen, MN. 55331 Parcel #: 250080700 Legal Description:. Total Acreage: 1.02 Wetlands Present? ❑ Yes ® No See Attached Present Zoning: Single -Family Residential District (RSF) Requested Zoning: Single -Family Residential District (RSF) Present Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Requested Land Use Designation: Residential Low Density Existing Use of Property: Single family residence ❑✓ Check box if separate narrative is attached. -Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Estate Development Corporation Contact: Tom Gonyea Address: 15250 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 101 Phone: (612) 990-0666 City/State2ip: Wayzata, MN. 55391 Cell: Email: tom@landmn.com Fax: Tom Gon ea Dig y.�edbyTpnC.m 5/14/18 Signature: Y DeE W18.MM13:18:12-0W Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Estate Development Corporation Contact: Tom Gonyea Address: 15250 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 101 Phone: (612) 990-0666 City/State/Zip: Wayzata, MN. 55391 Cell: Email: tom@landmn.com Fax: Signature: Tom Gonyea 1NSO. bYT..�G+..Y.. oa. zm3.ossoaz5sasoo Date: 5/15/18 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the speck ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Alliant Engineering, Inc. Contact: Mark Rausch Address: 233 Park Ave. So. Suite 300 Phone: (612) 767-9339 City/State/Zip: Minneapolis, MN. 55415 Cell: Email: mrausch@alliant-inc.com Fax Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: ❑ Property Owner Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑� Applicant Via: F] Email❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑ Engineer Via: 0 Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other* Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary forth fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital Copy t0 the City for processing. SAVE FORM PRINT FORM SUBMR FORM ISSUED BY CI'STO\I HONIE BUILDERS TITLE, LIA' AS ISSUING AGENT FOR STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY COMMITMENT NUMBER HB-37163 SCHEDULE B - SECTION II EXCEPTIONS Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the company: 1. If an owner's policy is to be issued, the mortgage encumbrance, if any, created as part of the purchase transaction. 2. Defects, liens encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment. 3. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 4. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. 5. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 7. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 8. General and special taxes and assessments, as hereafter listed, if any (all amounts shown being exclusive of interest, penalties, and costs): A) Real estate taxes payable in 2018 are $3,728.00 and are half paid. Base Tax $3,698.00. Property Identification No. 25.0080700. (Non -Homestead) Note: There are no delinquent taxes of record. B) Levied or pending assessments of record if any. Note: An assessment search has been requested and an endorsement will follow with the results of that search. 9. Terms and conditions of Easement in favor of Village of Chanhassen, as created in document dated February 28, 1973, filed April 23, 1973, as Document No. 18336. 10. Rights or claims of tenants, as tenants only, in possession under unrecorded leases. END OF SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS SEE ATTACHED FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THIS FILE ALTA Commitment Schedule B - Section II (06/17/06) (HB-37163.PFDMB-37163/19) ISSUED BY CUSTODI HODIE BUILDERS TITLE, LLC AS ISSUING AGENT FOR STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY COMMITMENT NUMBER HB-37163 SCHEDULE B - SECTION I REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: Warranty Deed from Jill Anderson and Daniel Anderson, wife and husband, to Estate Development Corporation. 2. Assignment of Purchase Agreement assigning the interest of Thomas L. Gonyea to Estate Development Corporation 3. Secure and record a Release or Satisfaction of the following Mortgage: Dated May 18, 2015 Filed May 28, 2015 Document No. 195477 Amount: $201,000.00 Executed by: Jill Anderson and Daniel Anderson, wife and husband To Mortgagee: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as nominee for Lender, American Mortgage & Equity Consultants, Inc. 4. Obtain a release, satisfaction or an affidavit of non-identity for the following judgment: Judgment against Daniel Anderson, dated October 20, 2008, docketed October 20, 2008, as Case No. 10CV081521, in the amount of $2,855.28, in favor of Palisades Collection LLC AT & T. 5. IN ORDER FOR CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE, LLC TO CLOSE THIS TRANSACTION, WE REQUIRE ACASHIERS CHECK OR WIRED FUNDS TO BE RECEIVED AT OR PRIOR TO CLOSING. *** Wire Fraud and Email Hacking are on the rise with title companies and their customers. Please DO NOT WIRE any funds to Custom Home Builders Title, LLC without calling in advance to verify our wire instructions. *** *** Sale proceeds will not be wired without written authorization. Upon our receipt and review of a standard form of affidavit, Items Nos. 3, 6 and 7 of Schedule B - Section II may be deleted from the final policy. A plat drawing will be required to delete Item Nos. 4 and 5 of Schedule B - Section II from the final policy. We require a Well Disclosure Certificate be completed and furnished at the time of closing for all deeds that require a Certificate of Real Estate Value. OR The following statement must be added to the deed: The seller certifies that the seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 requires that the seller provide the following information at the time of closing: 1. Tax Identification Number 2. Full Forwarding Address. Issued by: Custom Home Builders Title, LLC, 10850 Old County Road 15, Plymouth, MN 55441 If you have questions about this commitment or about the closing of this transaction please contact Tanya Gardner at (763) 489-3240 x 271 or email tanyag@chbtitle.com. ALTA Commitment Schedule B- Section 1(06f17/06) (HB-37163.1RFD/HB-37163/19) ISSUED BY CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE, LLC AS ISSUING AGENT FOR STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY COMMITMENT NUMBER HB-37163 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of Carver, State of Minnesota, and is described as follows: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 8; thence North 89 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds East along the North line of said Section a distance of 670.0 feet; thence South 7 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 720.0 feet to the centerline of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline a distance of 222.0 feet to a point distant 576.4 feet Northwesterly of the East Line of said Government Lot 1, as measured along the centerline of said Red Cedar Point Road, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described, and which point is also the Northeasterly corner of that tract of land described in the first description appearing in Book 51 of Deeds, Page 884, office of the Register of Deeds, Carver County, Minnesota; thence continuing South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline of Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 197.0 feet; thence South 13 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 254.25 feet; thence North 77 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 211.69 feet more or less to the Easterly Line of said tract as described in said Book 51 of Deeds, page 884; thence North 16 degrees 42 minutes 50 seconds East along said Easterly Line a distance of 292.17 feet more or less to the actual point of beginning and there terminating. Excepting therefrom that part taken for Red Cedar Point Road. Except all that part of the above described land lying Easterly of the West line of the tract of land described in Certificate of Title No. 5187, Files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota, which tract of land is described as follows: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 8; thence east on the North Line of said Section a distance of 670 feet to the center line of Glencoe Road; thence South 8 degrees 56 minutes West along the center of Glencoe Road for a distance of 713.4 feet to the intersection of the center line of said Glencoe Road with the center line of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 65 degrees 56 minutes east along the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 619 feet to the initial point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 33 degrees 25 minutes west for a distance of 210 feet; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes west 166.90 feet to a point; thence northeasterly on a line having a bearing of North 16 degrees 10 minutes east a distance of 273.77 feet; more or less, to the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road; thence southeasterly on the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 224.17 feet, more or less, to the place of beginning, all in Carver County, State of Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part taken for said Red Cedar Point Road. Torrens Property Torrens Certificate No. 37556.0 ALTA Commitment (HB-37163.PFD/H&37163119) ExhibitA ISSUED BY CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE, LLC AS ISSUING AGENT FOR STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY Commitment Number: HB-37163 SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: April 15, 2018 at 07:00 AM 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) X Owner's Policy ( ALTA Own. Policy (06/17/06) ) Proposed Insured: Estate Development Corporation (b) Loan Policy ( ALTA Loan Policy(06/17/06) ) Proposed Insured: 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is Fee Simple. 4. Title to the Fee Simple estate or interest in the land is at the Effective Date vested in: Daniel Anderson and Jill Anderson, as joint tenants Amount $ 310,000.00 5. The land referred to in the Commitment is situated in Carver County, State of Minnesota and is described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT AATTACHED HERETO FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY: The company has not verified, does not insure, and makes no representation that the information below is about the above insured property. According to insured's representation or vesting instrument(s), the street address of the property has been represented to the company as follows: Address: 3861 Red Cedar Point Rd, Chanhassen, MN 55331 Custom Home Builders Title, LLC By: ✓- , _ Custom Home Builders Title, LLC ALTA Commitment Schedule A(6/17/06) (1-18-37163.PFI)MB-37163/19) VARIANCE REQUEST SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE RED CEDAR POINT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA May 15, 2018 SITE INFORMATION Legal Description: That part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 8; thence North 89 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds East along the North line of said Section a distance of 670.0 feet; thence South 7 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 720.0 feet to the centerline of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline a distance of 222.0 feet to a point distant 576.4 feet Northwesterly of the East Line of said Government Lot 1, as measured along the centerline of said Red Cedar Point Road, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described, and which point is also the Northeasterly comer of that tract of land described in the first description appearing in Book 51 of Deeds, Page 884, office of the Register of Deeds, Carver County, Minnesota; thence continuing South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline of Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 197.0 feet; thence South 13 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 254.25 feet; thence North 77 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 211.69 feet more or less to the Easterly Line of said tract as described in said Book 51 of Deeds, page 884; thence North 16 degrees 42 minutes 50 seconds East along said Easterly Line a distance of 292.17 feet more or less to the actual point of beginning and there terminating. Excepting therefrom that part taken for Red Cedar Point Road. Except all that part of the above described land lying Easterly of the West line of the tract of land described in Certificate of Title No. 5187, Files of Registrar of Titles, Carver County, Minnesota, which tract of land is described as follows: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence east on the North Line of said Section a distance of 670 feet to the center line of Glencoe Road; thence South 8 degrees 56 minutes West along the center of Glencoe Road for a distance of 713.4 feet to the intersection of the center line of said Glencoe Road with the center line of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 65 degrees 56 minutes east along the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 619 feet to the initial point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 33 degrees 25 minutes west for a distance of 210 feet; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes west 166.90 feet to a point; thence northeasterly on a line having a bearing of North 16 degrees 10 minutes east a distance of 273.77 feet; more or less, to the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road; thence southeasterly on the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 224.17 feet, more or less, to the place of beginning, all in Carver County, State of Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part taken for said Red Cedar Point Road. Torrens Property Torrens Certificate No. 37556.0 Address: 3861 Red Cedar Point Road, Chanhassen, MN. 55331 PID & Acreage: 250080700, 1.023 acres Variance Request May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 1 of 3 DESCRIPTION OF VARIANCE REQUEST The proposed request for variance from City Code is for permission to allow for a proposed subdivision that includes 1 single family residential lot with a minimum lot right of way frontage of 79.96 feet. The City's Zoning Ordinance for RSF — Single Family Residential identifies a minimum lot frontage width of 90' for standard lots. Design Alternatives The applicant has explored site design alternatives to investigate if there is an option that would not require a variance to subdivide the existing parcel into 2 lots. A total of 3 alternative were developed, see attached concept plans and following descriptions: Concept A: Site option would expand/dedicate additional right of way along Red Cedar Point Road. The additional right of way would be provided with an arc into the project resulting in 90 lineal feet of right of way frontage each lot. Both lots would meet all criteria for RSF zoning standards. Concept B: Site option would expand/dedicate additional right of way along Red Cedar Point Road. The additional right of way would be provided in an `eyebrow' shape similar to a cul-de-sac bulb. The resultant lot configuration would result in 90+ lineal feet of frontage for each lot and the lots would have 90 feet in width at the 30' front setback. Both lots would meet all criteria for RSF zoning standards. Concept C: Site option uses the City zoning code definition of flag lot to define 2 new parcels. As conceptualized the existing home would be situated in a flag lot that is designed with a 100' width at the flag start including a 30' setback to the existing home. The second lot would meet the 90' right of way frontage and 90' lot width at the front setback. Both lots would meet all criteria for RSF zoning standards. Alternate Summary Concepts A, B and C show that there are RSF zoning code compliant alternatives to the submitted plan but they would result in less desirable plat options for the City and Applicant. The additional dedication of public right of way in Concept A and B would result in a reduction the taxable land for the City of Chanhassen and lower development fee receipt. The additional right of way either in arch or bulb shape would create the right of way frontage length and minimum lot width at the front setback that the City identifies in the City Code but serve no infrastructure purpose. Concept C does provides a RSF code compliant flag lot line configuration but the plan creates unconventional lots that could present coordination issues between the future lot owners. Preferred Option Summary The proposed variance request plan does contain one lot (new home) that will meet all RSF zoning criteria. The other lot with the existing home would need a variance for reduced lot width but it Variance Request May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 2 of 3 would still maintain a width of 80 lineal feet right of way frontage and be 80+ feet in width at the 30' front setback. Both lots would meet or exceed the desired 60' wide x 60' deep building pads or buildable area. The proposed variance would result in lots that do not require additional right of way dedication, and provides a new lot line that is parallel to the existing west parcel boundary creating a typical lot line that is clearly defined for future owners. VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION Check to City findings for granting a variance (pursuant to City Code Section 20-58): a) The requested variance results in a subdivision that would be in harmony with RSF zoning standards. Non -typical design alternatives do exist to technically create an RSF zoning complaint plan, however, they would have other detriments that are less beneficial to the City nor are as marketable for future lot/home owners. The variance request creates a subdivision that is consistent with the surrounding residential properties, of which, some are smaller than 90' wide themselves, including the property directly abutting the development site to the west. The variance request creates a plan that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and results in a land use density just under the City's estimate average demand within low density residential land use. b) The variance is not being requested for the property owner to use the property in a manner not permitted by RSF zoning standards. The proposed subdivision plan and requested variance is in substantial conformance to RSF zoning with one minor exception. c) The variance is not being requested for economic considerations alone. The variance is being requested to avoid unnecessary dedication of public right of way and to allow creation of lots with typical configuration reducing chance of conflict between future lot owners. d) The plight of the current landowner is due to the parcel being subdivided to its width prior to current RSF zoning standards and not at any fault of the landowner. There are existing lots near the proposed subdivision that also do not meet RSF zoning standards for lot width and thus the proposed variance request is reasonable. e) The variance if granted will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed variance plan will result in a subdivision that is consistent with the existing neighborhood. f) The variance is not being requested for earth sheltered construction. CONCLUSION The applicant respectfully concludes that the request for variance and subdivision will allow for a development consistent with adjacent single family residential lots and the City Goals and Objectives for this area. Variance Request May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 3 of 3 PRELMMARY SUBDIVISION AND FINAL PLAT REQUEST The proposed plan consists of a low density single family residential subdivision that splits an existing parcel into 2 single family residential lots. The existing home would remain on 1 parcel and a new home would be constructed on the new lot. EXISTING SITE DESCRIPTION The development site is 1.02 acres and is bound by Red Cedar Point Road to the north and existing residential properties to the east, west and south. The property currently includes one single family residence and one accessory garage building. The existing residence has two driveway connections to Red Cedar Point Road. The property frontage abutting Red Cedar does have a 3.5' roadway easement that when added to existing dedicated right of way equates to a 50' right of way corridor along the entire property roadway frontage. The property topography has a highpoint roughly midpoint from the north and south lot boundary, with the north half draining northerly and the south half drains southerly. The parcel has scattered tree coverage typical of a larger residential lot. There are no wetlands on the site. Comprehensive Plan Designation The application area has a current and future Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation of Residential Low Density. The adjacent land uses are also Residential Low Density. The Residential Low Density land use guides for single family housing density of 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre and the City has typically used an average of 2 units per acres for projection of land demand. The proposed development plan has a density of 1.98 units per net acre and so is consistent with the current and future Comprehensive Guide Plan land use for the property. Zoning Classification The property has a current zoning classification of RSF — Single Family Residential District as do the surrounding properties to the east, west and south. The property to the north along Red Cedar Cove is zoned PUDR — Planned Unit Development/Residential District. The existing parcel does have adequate size and dimension to allow for platting of a 2-lot subdivision compliant with RSF zoning regulations. Though the property can develop as 2 lots within RSF guidelines, a variance is proposed for one small concession to RSF zoning standards. See separate narrative for variance request. PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION PLAN The applicant's intent is to create a 2-lot single family residential development that is consistent with the existing single family lots in the vicinity of the property and is considerate of market demands. Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 2 of 4 The Developer is proposing to keep the existing home on one of the new lots and build a new home on the other. The existing home would be modified by removing the existing detached tuck under garage and existing screen porch and deck. A new 2-stall attached garage will be constructed on the existing home. The new home will be a custom built home set back from Red Cedar Road similarly to the existing home. The homebuilder for the new home is not known at this time. The followins is a summary of primary oroiect elements currently proposed: Gross Acreage 1.024 acres Wetland Area 0.0 acres Red Cedar Pointe Road R/W Dedication 0.014 acres Net Buildable Acreage 1.010 acres Net Density 1.98 units per acre Proposed Proposed Lot Dimensions RSF Standard Lot 1 Lot 2 Width along R/W Frontage 90'(min.) 79.96'1 90, Width at 30' Front Setback 80.75' 90, Lot Depth 125' (min.) 253.09' 255.06' Lot Size Minimum 15,000 sf 20,417 sf 23,572 sf Setbacks: Side Setbacks 10, 10, 10, Front Setback to R/W 30' 30' 30' Rear Setback 30' 30' 30' 1. Refer to separate variance request narrative for Lot I lot width. Vehicular Site Access and Pedestrian Circulation The proposed development does not require construction of any new public roadway or walkways. Right of way access for vehicles and pedestrians is available to both lots via Red Cedar Point Road. Gradine The only grading required will be what is necessary to: remove the existing home's garage and screen porch, construct the new garage on the existing home and build the new home. All earthmoving activities necessary for construction will require erosion and sediment control per City of Chanhassen requirements. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain The project does not require extension of any public sanitary sewer or watermain trunk lines. The existing home will continue to use the current water and sewer service from Red Cedar Point Road. The new home will require a new service connection to the available trunk sanitary sewer and watermain. Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 3 of 4 Stormwater Management The development is located within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; however, the City of Chanhassen and the City's Surface Water Management Plan provides governmental jurisdiction. The proposed development's size and impact area does not trigger any stormwater management requirements and thus no new stormwater treatment facilities are required. The lots are located within the Shoreland Management District and thus are limited to a maximum of 25% of impervious surface per lot. Wetlands The are no onsite wetlands. Tree Preservation The estimated baseline tree canopy coverage for the existing site is 42% of the net area (excluding perimeter right of way dedication). Per the City code, low density residential is then allowed to remove to a limit of 35% tree canopy prior to requirement of mitigation. The development plan proposes to maintain tree canopy coverage of 36% and thus no tree replacement is required per City Ordinance. Landscanine Each lot is required to install a minimum of one deciduous or conifer tree in the front yard, in accordance with the City's Subdivision Ordnance. The new tree must either be an 8' conifer or 2.5" deciduous with species chosen from the City's approved list. TLMNG/PHASING If the City approves the variance and subdivision request, it is the Applicant's desire to proceed with modifications to the existing home and placing both lots are the market. CONCLUSION The applicant respectfully concludes that this request for subdivision approval will allow for a development consistent with adjacent single family residential lots and the City Goals and Objectives for this area. Preliminary Subdivision and Final Plat Submittal May 15, 2018 Red Cedar Point — Chanhassen, MN Page 4 of 4 Y y Fjy 1 � 10 ■ / �t ro ik 12.84 f a 8461 0 20 40 80 B. SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT DEVELOPED USING COUNTY GIS AND LiDAR TOPOGRAPHY I � eS.y w 13,93 ' 10 Ilk F1f�P G4 .IN !q 1 TO go t tii •. erAr # 90.S1 BS.BS • N 0 20 40 80 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT DEVELOPED USING COUNTY GIS AND LiDAR TOPOGRAPHY -1. f MU r rW I EXHIBIT DEVELOPED USING COUNTY GIS AND LiDAR TOPOGRAPHY SCALE IN FEET l� �dw Nliarit Engineering. Inc. ne.n� RED BOUNDARY AND CEDAR POINT ROAD PROPERTY TOPO W/ LOT SPLIT CONCEPT A "R/W T33 P&M Ave Stems Mnneepdie. MN55e15 ADD." elvsesoeo [aun sak: CHANHASSEN, MN 612756.3099 FAx A,eyent�nc.oan o� 0.SIISnB 1'�O a SsVlfll ff 1 8585 N 0 20 40 80 SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT DEVELOPED USING COUNTY GIS AND LiDAR TOPOGRAPHY It :S tp c arrs ew i6 S n wovf I L q6 )r 5365 F T \ 0 20 40 80 i SCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT DEVELOPED USING COUNTY GIS AND LiDAR TOPOGRAPHY RED CEDAR POINT CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAY 18 2018 n ae.r,y �� x Vme\+eoonWm w.aY'.w nmVaw+xo<me uor .s so+e - rz:am z <ag�?3 L7 'zd 49m�'sy X � 5 o z z 0 v t HU wRi�F� 1<e 00 o sgF �o ai > > � O 'y B g f=•�i� RED CEDAR POINT c > gPB C € !: it cx�xxrsscx, uixxEmrn kNus�:r F ;> i V i� rg 5' : D i H: Z PRELIMINARY I FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL II a 'ail 3 y a' COVER SHEET Pg i � P vag �g �i. re Oi V• — Fi E EP/ 1-0 e p p \ e �� .i �r € r• e . .� f II '-- __`1_;Y a��mi—`tom':• €i i - /",4. x / �4 / ? 6 0(DA 4. i 8B'"F� if a �f !� , � e•F a ! €i i€._�ifi i�F. EE ,r"i��r� �9 �i yid��di74l�fif• +$ n m > i 22$' ¢' g if s g i !d "� 3��Si �� if f!`6tl�2.s•ipa 3 o if i�ii�� q g SS g a � ifi. � uz m � � • �� E� d "s � �� i 6:�i�F3?eq� i �.d i i} gs[irq o € Q 6 $q �3t i € i i i€� ►€ i ii(r� if i; §§gg� [p`,H If r �pf�e3d�}i�;� y iFp`s3¢y ^ 3 i i Pi f 3�ii�i7�t� [ of Fea€iFiEla d(i �'�• S:q fe bmig mmc Y\]NeV W. iWwy\..v�nq mr6imaV �]evr.Cry Wy �A ]08 - ?Tpn j§! � � | )\(§ |)) R §� p—F D e § . ,• ,,| [�� !]! % —�"-- r§!a ! \co!I • , 4 ! __ __ §|R FINAL __� AL PRELIMINARY D§|] ____ Wamp mne x\roleVemmWa� vnens\rM PM\�eWJei=ee.q wr �a XNe - I.., 9 ' Sm� i gF No # �p Da Iff= ,ow Im Inn I t i q3:{ b Fle {:{it{{ . L{{ t LL# dg P f{ 6LL3 iLLii i{� iii RRSs R:iF iRi qq j ' ii9} I� RED CEDAR POINT EEE Da�fr&3 . It LNANHASSEM. 41NNESOi1 :r S b+x D 1 �1 Igj; L PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL 8 . : Z i p 3-i' a i ` E 9a 1F } SITE AND UTILITY PLAN N o a.x=..onc u..u\r -. u.r+e. 1..-11M, t • sll! RED CEDAR POINT wi,xx•ssrn. u�xn[sore M v V r cm 9 8 3 5 :� PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL .� Y ' a R .ii S•� V.1 'R�R S $ : Z 3 S S 3 ` -• f GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN a 6aYi9 ^^^� F\Aip\1QN[�pa YM�\!'M Flul\t60]YYapq YeY �`+]N[ - 121ipn F 71;{ RED CEDAR POINT ## c Sko ) :r [ p [El I[ ClIAlINAS$EX. YINNESOiA ) D q [ [ �a ppELIMINARV / FINALPLAT SUBMITTAL Z TREE CANOPY COVERAGE PLAN o `� ae..ig nonce xVmeVuarmV+a N..YV�Y nwVewiwt..u.0 uor +s role - ixtw� 01111@I@IIII0B0911�1@@@I@@IIIII@0� 11111111111111111111111111111111118 1111111111111191111111111111111111 M mm m m 0 C ti m m v m m m y 0 0 m N g * 4 E fQ•BS—il 4 11IN ` �+ RED CEDAR POINT CNNASSEN. Y�MNf50iN s SY c r D gib :Z a g PRELIMINARY FINAL PLAT SUBMITTAL TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN RED CEDAR POINT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Estate Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, owner of the following described property That part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence North 89 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds East along the North line of said Section a distance of 670.0 feet; thence South 7 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 720.0 feet to the centerline of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline a distance of 222.0 feet to a point distant 576.4 feet Northwesterly of the East Line of said Government Lot 1, as measured along the centerline of said Red Cedar Point Road, said _ point being the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described, and which point is also the Northeasterly comer of that tract of land described in the first description appearing in Book 51 of Deeds, Page 884, office of the Register of Deeds, Carver County, Minnesota; thence continuing South 66 degrees 51 minutes 10 seconds East along said centerline of Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 197.0 feet; thence South 13 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 254.25 feet; thence North 77 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds West a distance of 211.69 feet more or less to the Easterly Line of said tract as described in said Book 51 of Deeds, page 884; thence North 16 degrees 42 minutes 50 seconds East along said Easterly Line a distance of 292.17 feet more or less to the actual point of beginning and there terminating. Excepting therefrom that part taken for Red Cedar Point Road. Except all that part of the above described land lying Easterly of the West line of the tract of land described in Certificate of Title No. 5187, Files of Registrar of Tites, Carver County, Minnesota, which tract of land is described as follows: All that part of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Section 8; thence east on the North Line of said Section a distance of 670 feet to the center line of Glencoe Road; thence South 8 degrees 56 minutes West along the center of Glencoe Road for a distance of 713.4 feet to the intersection of the center line of said Glencoe Road with the center line of Red Cedar Point Road; thence South 65 degrees 56 minutes east along the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 619 feet to the initial point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 33 degrees 25 minutes west for a distance of 210 feet; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes west 166.90 feet to a point; thence northeasterly on line having a bearing of North 16 degrees 10 minutes east a distance of 273.77 feet; more or less, to the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road; thence southeasterly on the center line of said Red Cedar Point Road a distance of 224.17 feet, more or less, to the place of beginning, all in Carver County, State of Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part taken for said Red Cedar Point Road. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as RED CEDAR POINT and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public way and drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Estate Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 20_ Signed: Estate Development Corporation Thomas L Gonyea, Chief Executive Officer STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on _ Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Printed Name by Thomas L. Gonyea, Chief Executive Officer of Estate Development Corporation, a Notary Public, My Commission Expires SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE County, Minnesota I Dennis B. Olmstead do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this _ day of STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on Dennis B. Olmstead, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 18425 by Dennis B. Olmstead, a Licensed Land Surveyor. Printed Name Notary Public, My Commission Expires County, Minnesota CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA This plat of RED CEDAR POINT was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of .20 , and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City Council, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota By: Mayor COUNTY SURVEYOR, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Clerk Pursuant to Chapter 395, Minnesota Laws of 1971, this plat has been approved this Brian Praske, County Surveyor By: COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that taxes payable in ,20 Laurie Davies, County Audftor/Treasurer By: day of and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. Dated this REGISTRAR OF TITLES, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plat of RED CEDAR POINT was filed this day of , 20 , at Registrar of Titles By: 20 day of o'clock _.M. as Document Number CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAY 18 2018 CHANHASSEN M AMN pq &N ALLIANT ENGINEERING r„rrr , �r n r,,rrrr� ---REFERENCE MONUMENT FOUND CARVER -- N89030'54"E 698.98 -- COUNTY C.I.M. • ---- V--670.00 -X----------- ��- NORTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT I T 1 `-NW COR. SEC. 8, T. 116, R. 23 3 ^ ; FOUND CARVER p COUNTY C.I.M. o � o� 00 N v �i n M -- \ / � \ I I L— L/ \/ L— L/ OFNTF�I/ E. \ 0"- ?2A0248Fp COtr RNTFR<YT ST FF\ C'e9 %OF 7. 0" 4 F A J 0"-yF T \ egS•T \ \I M ' N / h C/TCBTy R/GyT FO pFR STR - p0�+ NO 8 0 RED CEDAR POINT \ I / r— r l n / n A r— n / —/— 1 V L — / 1 I V / / L - / V / 041 QOj I I • FD IP i 1 \ / \ --WEST LINE OF l ---A POINT DISTANT 1093.4 FEET GOVERNMENT L07 3------570------y+ ,�� NORTH OF SOUTH LINE OF r- / , GOVERNMENT LOT 3 N78Oq , / /5 ,8 EEOi 211,95 / 8,5 69 (p i /sg 96 ; r 9 M 1 / N �\ s�qR� 'VO Fs I / 1 L— L_/ / I / a 1 � o N /V / o � / XXCCP TIOX--------- / (DESCRIBED IN C.O. L. NO. 5)87 AND p NOW PART OF SEARLES ADDITION) - - - - — - -L- / I I I/ I L/ L/ I I I \/ l V _ _ l I J I FD IP 0.6 NW -- ------- S88042'54"W 166.90 _ _l VICINITY MAP SECTION 8, T. 116, R. 23 Q 2 Re0 3 3 p0//V 7 CeogR z a SITE Oq0 NW 1/4 NE 1/4 SW 1/4 SE 1/4 NOT TO SCALE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: I I 5 I 0 I I I I -1--- I I NOT TO SCALE Being 5 feet in width and adjoining lot lines and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines, unless otherwise indicated on the plat. THE NORTH LINE GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 116 NORTH, RANGE 23 WEST, IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N89R30'54"E, ALSO CARVER COUNTY NAD83 (1986). Denotes found monument, marked as shown O Denotes 1/2 inch x 18 inch iron monument set marked by license no. 18425 unless otherwise shown Denotes Carver County cast iron monument found N Scale in feet 0 30 60 90 1 INCH = 30 FEET ALLIANT ENGINEERING SHLLI 2 UL 2 SHLLIS