The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-15_1190 LYMAN BOULEVARD - DUANE SKLUZACEK & LINDA KERBER0 0 The contents of this file have been scanned. Do not add anything to it unless it has been scanned. Thomas J. Campbell Roger N. Knutson Thomas M. Scott Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehler Soren M. Mattick John F. Kelly Henry A. Schaeffer, III Alina Schwartz Shana N. Conklin Amy B. Schutt James J. Monge, III David H. Schultz Kurt S. Fischer Grand Oak Office Cent, - 860 Blue Gentian Road Suite 290, Eagan, MN 55121 651-452-5000 Fax 651-234-6237 w .ck-law.com CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association October 6, 2015 Ms. Kim Meuwissen City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: :isce!lan,ous'Zecord,7d Documents Dear Ms. Meuwissen: I's -tS RECEIVED OCT n g 2015 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Please find enclosed, for the City's files, the following original recorded documents: 1. Variance for Lot 2, Block 2, Hillside Oaks, recorded September 16, 2015 as document number A616639; and 2. Variance for Lot 2, Block 1, Trolls -Glen First Addition, recorded September 16, 2015 as document number A616637. Thank you. Very truly yours, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Jean . 0 son, Lega sistant /jmo Enclosures SCANNED 183816 Document No. A616639 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Certified Recorded on -September 16.. 2015 3:19 PM Fee'. $46.00 I1III III III I IIf I Ill 615639 County Count Recorder CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2015-15 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 25 -foot variance request from the 75 -foot wetland setback, based on the approximate wetland edge on the survey dated April 24, 2015, to construct a septic system. 2. Property. The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as Lot 2, Block 2, Hillside Oaks. 3. Condition. The variance approval is subject to the following condition: a. The applicant applies for and receives a building permit from the City. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse. Dated: August 18, 2015 1 SCANNED CITY O, FF CHANE ASSEN BY: LQldwt��l (SEAL) Do6ny Lau4nburger,%layor AND: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of )er✓► r , 2015 by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. KIM T. MEUWISSEN Nota1 4z�� n�..Pw Ewk»�31, 20201 DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 p,, to'. Cawplall44AWUn NOTARY PUINAC i CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FAX (952) 227-1110 0 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE JOB NO. 9/2/15 2015-15 ATTENTION Jean Olson RE: Document Recording TO: Campbell Knutson, PA Grand Oak Office Center 1 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 WE ARE SENDING YOU ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Request ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 8/18/15 15-15 Variance to construct septic system at 1190 Lyman Boulevard (Lot 2, Block 2, Hillside Oaks ❑ FORBIDS DUE THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return ® For Recording ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO: Duane Skluzacek, 1190 Lyman Boulevard Linda Kerber and Duane Skluzack, 3916 1901h Street, Lester Prairie, MN 55354 copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints SIGNE j)LUAAALf-- Kim euwiss n, (952) 227-1107 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. SCANNEC 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2015-15 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 25 -foot variance request from the 75 -foot wetland setback, based on the approximate wetland edge on the survey dated April 24, 2015, to construct a septic system. 2. Property. The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as Lot 2, Block 2, Hillside Oaks. 3. Condition. The variance approval is subject to the following condition: a. The applicant applies for and receives a building permit from the City. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse. Dated: August 18, 2015 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: (SEAL) Do6ny Laufdnburgeromayor AND: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisZ day of 5gQ L--rv1 bo 2015 by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. KIM T. MEIJWI�� NotsrY �ioxo wr oe�"rr"' DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 NOTARY Administration Re: Planning Case #2015-15, Variance Request Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Dear Mr. Skluzacek: Building inspections This letter is to inform you that on August 18, 2015, the Planning Commission, acting Phone: 952.227.1180 as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, approved a 25 -foot variance request from Fax: 952.227.1190 the 75 -foot wetland setback, based on the approximate wetland edge on the survey Engineeringdated April 24, 2015, to construct a septic system subject to the following conditions: Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.2271170 1. The applicant applies for and receives a building permit from the City. Finance The City will record the variance on the property with Carver County. The variance Phone: 952.227.1140 is valid for one year from the approval date. A building permit must be applied for Fax:952.227.1110 prior to August 18, 2016 through the City's Building Department or the variance Park &Recreation becomes void. Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax 952.221110 If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (952) 227-1132 or by email at dingvalson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Recreation Center 2310 Couller Boulevard Sincerely, Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 /I Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Drew Ingvalson Fax:952.2271110 Assistant Planner Public works EC: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director 7901 Park Place Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Phone: 952.227]300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Senior Center g:\plan\2015 planning cum\2015-15 1190 lyman blvd variance\appmv l lena.doc Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.2271110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Lite - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED 0 August 26, 2015 CITY OF ONSEN Duane R. Skluzacek 7700 Market Boulevard 1190 Lyman Blvd. PBox Chanhassen, MNN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Re: Planning Case #2015-15, Variance Request Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Dear Mr. Skluzacek: Building inspections This letter is to inform you that on August 18, 2015, the Planning Commission, acting Phone: 952.227.1180 as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, approved a 25 -foot variance request from Fax: 952.227.1190 the 75 -foot wetland setback, based on the approximate wetland edge on the survey Engineeringdated April 24, 2015, to construct a septic system subject to the following conditions: Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.2271170 1. The applicant applies for and receives a building permit from the City. Finance The City will record the variance on the property with Carver County. The variance Phone: 952.227.1140 is valid for one year from the approval date. A building permit must be applied for Fax:952.227.1110 prior to August 18, 2016 through the City's Building Department or the variance Park &Recreation becomes void. Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax 952.221110 If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (952) 227-1132 or by email at dingvalson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Recreation Center 2310 Couller Boulevard Sincerely, Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 /I Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Drew Ingvalson Fax:952.2271110 Assistant Planner Public works EC: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director 7901 Park Place Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Phone: 952.227]300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Senior Center g:\plan\2015 planning cum\2015-15 1190 lyman blvd variance\appmv l lena.doc Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.2271110 Website www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Chanhassen is a Community for Lite - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED • • Chanhassen Planning Commission — August 18, 2015 7. Walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: 1190 LYMAN BOULEVARD VARIANCE. PLANNING CASE 2015-15: REOUEST FOR VARIANCE TO WETLAND SETBACK TO RELOCATE SEPTIC SYSTEM ON PROPERTY ZONED AGRICULTURAL ESTATE (A2) AND LOCATED AT 1190 LYMAN BOULEVARD. APPLICANT/OWNER: DUANE SKLUZACEK. Ingvalson: This next case is for a wetland setback variance request. Location of the subject property is at 1190 Lyman Boulevard. If you look over here it is just off of Powers Boulevard and then off of Lyman also. The city sewer currently is not available to this property and also the subject property is not required to connect to city sewer due to it being over 150 feet from the city sanitary sewer. Here's an image of the subject house. This house was constructed in 1984 with a septic system designed to handle 2 bedrooms. At some point in time after 1984 this house was remodeled and, for it to have another 2 bedrooms so now it is currently a 4 bedroom home. There's not any city record in our city building files that show when this was completed or when this was done. So the request the applicant has is that they are requesting a variance from the 75 foot wetland setback to construct a new septic system with a 4 bedroom design. The existing system is failing so that's why this is coming about. They need to get a new system in there. This new system will be an enlargement as I stated from a current 2 bedroom design to a 4 bedroom design. The applicant is proposing to do a Type 3 mound system which will be located on top of part of the current system partially. Here is an image of the property and all the setbacks that this structure is going to need to meet. Looking on here the dark green is the wetland. The light green is the 75 foot wetland setback. The reddish pink is the 20 foot structure setback. Here's from the house. The blue circle is the 50 foot well setback. The purple is the 10 foot property line setback. Brown here is the 20 foot steep slope setbacks and there's also some more structures in there that make it very difficult to put this new system in. This goldish color is gravel which is compacted soils which can't be used for a septic system. Leaving only this white area as possible areas for a new septic system. The proposed location is right here, this orange rectangle for the new system. An alternative location is right here in this cross hatched area or this cross line area as an alternative spot. However the building, the City's building department has gone out and looked on site. There is a drainage way that goes through to the wetland right here in this dark blueish area which also makes this a poor area for a new septic system. The main reason that the property owner is looking to have this septic system in another spot was to preserve some mature trees. Looking on the left side here the mature trees that they are looking to preserve for this project. To the right is some smaller trees that will need to be removed with the new septic mound system that they're looking to locate it. Here is an elevation and drainage diagram. The low point on the property is located on the southwest area with it going down in elevation to the wetland area. Here is the location of the drainage ditch. You can see these contours that drainage flows through this area to the wetland. There's also steep slopes behind the back side of the house which make it difficult for the, that makes it not able to meet the steep slope area there. The diagram shows the proposed septic site right here. It has to be located with the contours per building requirements for a new septic system. This report was 0 SCANNED 0 0 Chanhassen Planning Commission — August 18, 2015 also reviewed by our Water Resources Coordinator. It's noted that the setback, the wetland setback is unique to Chanhassen City Code and is not in the Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 so it's strictly there from the City of Chanhassen. Also the wetland boundary was something that was a bit of concern looking through this report. The boundary is assumed based only upon general observations of the soils and topography. However our Water Resources Coordinator found it indeterminate if the proposed location is actually closer to the wetland than the other location in the drawing that you saw with those hatched lines so with that and with his review there is no compelling reason to deny the variance request as long as it complies with Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 and accepted industry practices. Upon review of this property there were not any variances that have been requested or granted within 500 feet of the subject property so there isn't really any standard to go off of. After review staff recommends that the Board of Appeals and Adjustments approve a 25 foot variance request from the 75 foot wetland setback based on the approximate wetland edge on the survey dated April 24, 2015 and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Decision subject to the following condition. The applicant applies for an receives a building permit from the City. That ends the staff report. If you have any questions I would be open to them now. Aanenson: I just wanted to add one thing too. We did ask them to do, meet the criteria. Do the test to see if that would be an acceptable site. When they first came in you know we're looking at all kinds of opportunities but we said we want to make sure if we're giving a variance that that drain field will work so that was a proven, acceptable site by our building official and by their qualified tester so where we're putting that it's recommended that it would meet the City standards. Aller: And that's the first site or both sites? Ingvalson: The proposed site that they have which would be the one that is in orange. Aller: Not hatched. Aanenson: Yeah, correct. Ingvalson: That would require the variance. Aller: And Mr. Jeffery looked at the proposed orange site. Ingvalson: Correct. Aller: And has no problem with that. Ingvalson: Correct. Aller: And my guess is that because it's next to that drainage ditch he would not prefer to have it in the hatched. Ingvalson: Correct. Chanhassen Planning Commission — August 18, 2015 Aanenson: So the applicant first came in and just wanted to get a variance. We say well we're not going to give you a variance if we don't even know it's going to work so we first we have to go out and decide where the best place to put that so as Drew went through all the different you know restrictions it made it a little bit challenging so, but they did do a couple test sites and that was one that did pass and then we took our variance from there. Aller: And then a question for Alyson. With it sitting on top are there any indications that there might be problems in the future or is there anything we should know about that? Fauske: With respect to the location? Aller: Right. The planned proposed location is to be where the other one is located and I heard it's going to be on top of the old one. Is it going to be tied in to the old one or is the old one going to be removed and what impact? Fauske: I'm not familiar with how the mound system is worked. I do know they've been working closely with the City's IS, Independent Sewage Treatment System inspector and working through all the requirements with that. Ingvalson: It's been reviewed by our building department and they have not found any concerns with that location. Aller: And we're not in the near future planning on putting water and sewer where they could connect? Aanenson: No. Not in the immediate future so. Aller: Any additional questions? Yusuf Just one just for my understanding. Is it standard practice to just size the septic system for the number of bedrooms and not over size it a little bit? Aanenson: Yeah today's practice is you do 2 alternative sites. These are older. Our practice has changed. Somebody coming in today has to provide an alternative site. This has been a problem as we looked, as we kind of did our tour. As you go down to the southern part of the city where we, and if you look at how large this lot is really it just very compromises the ability to find alternative sites. We have that when you're on the bluff too. You may have a 5 acre site but maybe you have less than a half acre that's outside of the bluff and then you also have structures on there. Compacted soils. Driveways so today's rule is you have to have 2 sites. So if you do add on those are times that we would check it. Also when there's a sale of the property that's a requirement that they test the system and so that's some of the trigger points. We make sure that someone else coming into that house doesn't have a failing system. 10 0 0 Chanhassen Planning Commission — August 18, 2015 Ingvalson: I'd also like to note our building department also looked for possibly separating the sites and having 2 separate locations that could be tied together to meet the 4 bedroom requirement and was unable to find a location that that would work. Aller: Okay. Based on that information any additional questions? Okay the applicant's not present. We'll open up the public hearing portion of the item. Now's the time for any individual to come forward and speak either for or against the request. Seeing no one come forward I will close the public hearing and open it up for comment and discussion. I think it's pretty straight forward. Hokkanen: Very challenging. Nice colors. Aller: For all the right reasons. Hokkanen: That was challenging based on the map. Measuring all that. Aller: Certainly meets the requirements in my view for a variance. The need is there. The special nature of the property. I'll entertain a motion. Undestad: I'll make the motion here. Aller: Commissioner Undestad. Undestad: Recommend that the Board of Appeals and Adjustments approve a 25 foot variance request from the 75 foot wetland setback based on the approximate wetland edge on the survey dated April 24, 2015 and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Decision subject to the following conditions, that the applicant apply for and receives a building permit from the City. Aller: I have a motion, do I have a second? Yusuf. Second. Aller: I have a motion by Commissioner Undestad, a second by Commissioner Yusuf. Any further discussion? Undestad moved, Yusuf seconded that the Board of Appeals and Adjustments approve a 25 foot variance request from the 75 foot wetland setback based on the approximate wetland edge on the survey dated April 24, 2015 to construct a septic system and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Decision subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant applies for and receives a building permit from the City. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Hokkanen noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated July 21, 2015 as presented. 11 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION IN RE: Application of Duane R. Skluzacek for a variance to construct a septic system that encroaches into the wetland setback on property zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) — Planning Case 2015-15. On August 18, 2015, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District (A2). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 2, Block 2, Hillside Oaks. 4. Variance Findings — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The subject site is zoned Agricultural Estate District. The purpose of the request is to replace a failing system with one sized for a four-bedroom home. The construction of a septic system is a normal use of the property in the Agricultural Estate District. The applicant's proposal does not encroach further into the required setback than what is required and maintains all other required setbacks. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The applicant's request to construct a septic system within the wetland setback is reasonable. The property is severely constrained with the available siting options of a septic system due to the location of the wetland, water well, existing house, gravel driveway, steep slopes, and property lines. The applicant has no other alternatives for the location of the septic system without negatively affecting the drainage system into the SCANNED wetland. This altemative location may also require the re -meandering of the drainage ditch to the wetland. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. The stated intent is to preserve mature trees and construct a septic system that is built for the number of bedrooms (4) within the home. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The location of the wetland on the property severely limits the septic system locations available to the property owner. This unique circumstance was not created by the landowner (home, property lines, gravel driveway, well, wetland). e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The mound septic system will be unseen from the public and neighboring properties and will help protect the wetland. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2015-15, dated August 18, 2015, prepared by Drew Ingvalson, et al, is incorporated herein. DECISION "The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 25 -foot setback variance from the 75 -foot wetland setback to construct a septic system subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit from the City." ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 18`s day of August, 2015. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Chairman PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance to locate a septic system that encroaches into the wetland setback, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The existing septic system needs to be replaced. The property owner is requesting a variance to allow them to locate a replacement septic system within the wetland setback. LOCATION: 1190 Lyman Boulevard (PID 25-3530090) of{..(„ . APPLICANT: Duane R. Skluzacek 1190 Lyman Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 PRESENT ZONING: Agricultural Estate (A2) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (Net density 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 3.49 acres (152,024.4 square feet) DENSITY: NA LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. SCANNED 0 0 Planning Commission 1190 Lyman Blvd Variance — Planning Case 2015-15 August 18, 2015 Page 2 of 7 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The property owner is requesting a variance to the wetland setback to replace a septic system. The proposed septic system will encroach into the wetland setback because it must be designed for four bedrooms, which is larger than the existing two-bedroom design. The applicant has proposed the subject location to preserve mature trees located on the property, south of the proposed site (see gray dots on south side of the property in Image 1). Beyond these limitations, there are numerous additional constraints with locating a septic system on the subject property. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 19, Article III, Municipal Sanitary Sewage Disposal System Section 19-41, Connection required Chapter 19, Article IV, Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems Section 19-67, Amendments Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article IV, Division 4, Nonconforming Use Section 20-72, Nonconforming uses and structures Chapter 20, Article VI, Wetland Protection Section 20-410, General Standards The subject home was constructed in 1984 and included a septic system designed to support two bedrooms. Since construction, the home has been remodeled and now has four bedrooms. There is no record in the City's building file of a permit being approved for the additional bedroom remodels. To meet building requirements, the new septic system must be constructed to support the four-bedroom dwelling. The Wetland Protection Section of City Code states that the "septic and soil absorption system must be setback a minimum of 75 feet from the ordinary high water mark of the wetland." Furthermore, along with being set back 75 feet from the wetland, the Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SSTS) Chapter of City Code also requires septic systems to be set back from private single-family water supply wells or buried water suction pipes (50 feet), buried pipes distributing water under pressure (10 feet), structures (20 feet), property lines and road right of ways (10 feet), slopes greater than 20 percent (20 feet), and various other features. The existing two-bedroom septic system is located within the 50 -foot well setback, but meets all other setback requirements. City sewer and water service is currently not available to the subject property. The subject property is also over 150 feet from the City's sanitary sewer system; therefore, the owner is not required to connect to the city's sewer system per City Code Section 19-41. I Planning Commission 1190 Lyman Blvd Variance — Planning Case 2015-15 August 18, 2015 Page 3 of 7 ANALYSIS The applicant is proposing to construct a mound septic system due to the high water table on the subject property. This septic system will be built to support the four-bedroom dwelling. The applicant is proposing to locate the septic system partially on top of the existing trench septic system and will encroach 25 feet into the 75 -foot wetland setback, creating a 50 -foot setback from the wetland. The applicant has positioned the septic system parallel with elevation changes on the site at the recommendation of staff and as required by septic design requirements. Setbacks The applicant's options are very limited in locating a four-bedroom septic system on the subject property due to the numerous setback requirements. As seen in Image 1 on page 4, the only areas that are allowed by City Code for a septic system are seen in white. As stated previously, the septic system must meet several setback requirements as follows: • Private single-family water supply wells or buried water suction pipes (50 feet) • Buried pipes distributing water under pressure (10 feet) • Structures (20 feet) • Property lines and road right of ways (10 feet) • Slopes greater than 20% (20 feet) In addition to meeting these requirements, there are further limitations on the site due to the existing gravel driveway, drainage system, and slopes. 1. There is an existing gravel driveway located along the north side of the home (see orange area in Image 1). The gravel driveway has caused the soils in this area to become compacted, which will not allow this area to be used to locate a new septic system. 2. On the southern side of the subject property there is a drainage ditch (see dark blue area in Image 1). This area provides a path for storm water drainage to flow into the wetland on the eastern side of the property. It is not recommended that a septic system be located in this location due to storm water drainage in this area (also see elevation in Image 2). The location of a septic system in this area may require re -meandering of the drainage ditch to the wetland. 3. There is a sharp elevation change directly north of the existing house (see brown area in Image 1). This drastic change in elevation (both greater and less than 20 percent) is not conducive with constructing a mound septic system and leads staff to not recommend a septic system be located in this area (also see elevation in Image 2). 0 0 Planning Commission 1190 Lyman Blvd Variance — Planning Case 2015-15 August 18, 2015 Page 4 of 7 To meet setbacks, staff reviewed the site to determine if it would be possible to locate two smaller systems on the property. This review found that it is not possible to locate two separate systems on the site without encroaching into the setbacks. To minimize impacts, it was determined that the best option is to have one system located on the site that would only encroach on the required wetland setback. Grade As seen in Image 2, the highest elevation on the subject property is along the southern property line. Moving north and east, the elevation begins to drop and becomes relatively flat in the far north and east portions of the property (wetland area). As stated previously, steep slopes north of the house make this area difficult to install a new septic system. There is also a drainage ditch located on the southern portion of the property. This area is thickly wooded and has a significant dip in elevation and would be problematic for a mound system due to the storm water running in the area after precipitation events. (The remainder of this page is intentionally blank) 0 0 Planning Commission 1190 Lyman Blvd Variance – Planning Case 2015-15 August 18, 2015 Page 5 of 7 Image 1: Setbacks and Structures Proposed Variance Location I Alternative Location [_ Mature Tree Patch - 75 -foot Wetland Setback - 20 -foot Structure Setback 50 -foot Well Setback ® 10 -foot Property Line Setback Steep Slopes (> 20%) Setback Wetland - Proposed Septic System Location _ Existing House Gravel Driveway (Compacted Soils) - Drainage Ditch C� Planning Commission 1190 Lyman Blvd Variance — Planning Case 2015-15 August 18, 2015 Page 6 of 7 Image 2: Two Foot Elevation Contours • Alternative Site Water Resources Coordinator Proposed Variance Site Drainage Ditch I Subsurface Sewage Treatment setbacks from wetlands are not included in MN Rules Chapter 7080, but rather are unique to Chanhassen City Code. As the wetland boundary is only assumed based upon general observations of soils and topography, it is indeterminate if the proposed location is actually closer to the wetland than the other location shown on the drawing. The applicant is making an attempt to be sensitive to other natural resources in the siting of the septic system. 0 0 Planning Commission 1190 Lyman Blvd Variance — Planning Case 2015-15 August 18, 2015 Page 7 of 7 Provided that the design and construction of the septic system is compliant with MN Rules Chapter 7080 and accepted industry practices, there is no compelling reason to deny the variance request. Variances within 500 feet of the Subject Property Based on staff review, there have not been any variances granted within 500 feet of the subject property. SUMMARY The property owner is requesting a variance to construct a four-bedroom capacity mound septic system that encroaches into the 75 -foot wetland setback. This new septic system will be larger than the previous septic system due to a reconfiguration of the home adding two more bedrooms. It is essential that a septic system of this size be constructed to ensure that adequate sanitation system is provided for the property. This new septic system will be located partially on top of the existing trench septic system. The subject site options for locating a septic system of this size is extremely limited due to the setback requirements (house, well, property line, wetland, slopes) and other elements (ditch and compacted soils). Staff has reviewed the site and worked with the applicant and has determined that the proposed site is the optimal location for the new septic system. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission, as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, approve a 25 -foot variance request from the 75 -foot wetland setback, based on the approximate wetland edge on the survey dated April 24, 2015, to construct a septic system and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Decision subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant applies for and receives a building permit from the City. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Decision. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Registered Land Survey. 4. Affidavit of Mailing of Public Hearing Notice. gAplan\2015 planning cases\2015-15 1190 lyman blvd varianc6staff report 11901yum blvd.doc 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION IN RE: Application of Duane R. Skluzacek for a variance to construct a septic system that encroaches into the wetland setback on property zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) — Planning Case 2015-15. On August 18, 2015, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District (A2). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 2, Block 2, Hillside Oaks. 4. Variance Findings — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The subject site is zoned Agricultural Estate District. The purpose of the request is to replace a failing system with one sized for a four-bedroom home. The construction of a septic system is a normal use of the property in the Agricultural Estate District. The applicant's proposal does not encroach further into the required setback than what is required and maintains all other required setbacks. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The applicant's request to construct a septic system within the wetland setback is reasonable. The property is severely constrained with the available siting options of a septic system due to the location of the wetland, water well, existing house, gravel driveway, steep slopes, and property lines. The applicant has no other alternatives for the location of the septic system without negatively affecting the drainage system into the • 0 wetland. This alternative location may also require the re -meandering of the drainage ditch to the wetland. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. The stated intent is to preserve mature trees and construct a septic system that is built for the number of bedrooms (4) within the home. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The location of the wetland on the property severely limits the septic system locations available to the property owner. This unique circumstance was not created by the landowner (home, property lines, gravel driveway, well, wetland). e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The mound septic system will be unseen from the public and neighboring properties and will help protect the wetland. £ Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2015-15, dated August 18, 2015, prepared by Drew Ingvalson, et al, is incorporated herein. DECISION "The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 25 -foot setback variance from the 75 -foot wetland setback to construct a septic system subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit from the City." ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 18' day of August, 2015. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Chairman 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division – 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address – P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 * CITY OFCBANBASSEN ? _ /%`/�K�PLICATIONrFOR DEVEL PMENT REVIEW 7//)-//-5- Submittal ateJ.II —T.�� PC Date: CC Date: 60 -Day Review Date:t—[—�� (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment .........................$600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ...... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) ❑ Single -Family Residence.................................$325 ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence..$325 ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 ❑ Rezoning (REZ) ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD)...................$750 (Additional recording fees may apply) ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................$100 Lv� Variance (VAR) ................................................... ❑ All Others .........................................................$500 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Sign Plan Review...................................................$150 ❑ Single -Family Residence...............................$150 ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Administrative ..................................................$100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts`......................$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: ( thousand square feet) Include number of existing employees: Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts.........................................$500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_ units) IJ / 4Qt ficatj61SSign (feity to install andre ve) ...../ ❑ Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Create 3 lots or less.........................................$300 ❑ Create over 3 lots ...................... $600 + $15 per lot ( lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds ........................ $300 + $50 per lot ( lots) ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑ Final Plat ..........................................................$700 Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs` 'Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC) ........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) _ Lv� Variance (VAR) ................................................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence...............................$150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ......................................................$100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) ................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, allbe charged for each application. the `appppr priate feeshallshal^ �!.vr �..(.....1�.................................. Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting)..... ❑ Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply) ............................. E) Conditional Use Permit �❑] Interim Use Permit ❑ Vacation Variance ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (number of deeds to be recorded: ) Description of Proposal: Property Address or Locatioli: _ Parcel # 6–yy 36680 Total Acreage: .3. S Present Zoning: �CfL41&na, Present Land Use Desianation: Existing Use of Property: _ ❑ Check box is separate D LYvtjA/V RLu .-" ...............-..................$3 per address (,5. . Daddr.esses) .# O ................ ....... $SO er document ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit TOTAL FEE: S I � C' Legal Description: Lo -7- 9 8 roc K a N i 1(s,,Ae 0akf Wetlands Present? n/yes ❑ No is attached. Requested Zoning: Requested Land Use Designation: _ N/ SCANNED APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: D #4 02 u e S1(t E,2 AC a k Contact: J u o nim Address: 119(7 L � wvf" &-t/IJ Phone: gS1- 93Y-- City/State/Zip: GGa „ k. rre,^ nA/ Ss317 Cell: & /9 - 7LY i Email: Signah Fax: .)JA Date: Jr— This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the speck ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Email: Contact: Phone: Cell: Fax: SCANNED Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff repo ? *Other Contact Information: L%wG Kcrbe�. Property Owner ❑ Applicant ❑ Engineer ❑ Other* Via: Via: Via: Via: [-]EmailMailed ❑ Email ❑ Email ❑ Email Paper Copy ❑ Mailed Paper Copy ❑ Mailed Paper Copy ❑ Mailed Paper Copy ame: 17 cr�rK r Address: 3 711, / 4o City/State/Zip: Lark moo,- u� 3 ftsY Email: SCANNED APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: City/State/Zip: Email: Signature: Phone: Cell: Fax: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: 0 uaa-e JWkzac e Ic Contact: J u o niG Address: _ 1140 L Y H. 4 N (.VV 4 Phone: X151- Y- 68o a City/State/Zip: 6L kacrGn NI AJ ST317 Cell: &Ig' Email: Signal Fax: Nl A Date: -5-- This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the speck ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Email: Contact: Phone: Cell: Fax: r^ 1.......-. Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff Zrepo7 Owner Via: ❑ Emaild Paper Copy ❑ Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy ❑ Engineer Via: El Email ❑Mailed Paper Copy ❑ Other* Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy •Other Contact Information:Property ame: n"u . Sfl�aac Address: 9/1, / 40 St. City/State/Zip: LQrk tea, �� s`sssy Email: r^ 1.......-. CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) )as. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on August 6, 2015, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for 1190 Lyman Boulevard Variance Request -Planning Case 2015-15 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this'\dda-y-of- tt 2015. t n/1�e r Notary Pub WASWIN PMit, D "Cl �k KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Publlc•MNuiewte Comte^ EtmkM Jen 91.1000 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for Variance to wetland setback to relocate septic Request for Variance to wetland setback to relocate septic system on propert zoned Agricultural Estate A2 Applicant: Duane Skluzacek Property 1190 Lyman Boulevard Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-15. If you wish to talk to www.cl.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-15. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Drew Ingvalson by Questions & email at dinovalson(Dci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1132. If you choose to submit written comments, it is 952-227-1132. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions. Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Ran Amendments and Code Amendments require a Public hearing before the Manning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any interested parry Is Invited to attend the meeting. • Start prepares a report on Me subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a pad of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hewing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Coundl. The City Coundl may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Manning Commission's recommendation Recommits, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except teachings and land use amendments from residential to commercialMtlustriel. • Minnesota State Statute 519 99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespe,soNrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meat with the neighborhood regarding that proposal. Start is also available to review the project with any interested personts). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be induced in the report to the City Council, M you wish to have something to be included In the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for Variance to wetland setback to relocate septic system on pro arty zoned Agricultural Estate A2 Applicant: Duane Skluzacek Property 1190 Lyman Boulevard Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead th What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.cl.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-15. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Drew Ingvalson by Questions & email at dinovalson()ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952-227-1132. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agent packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notif)(me to sign u I City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions. Planned Unit Developments. Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Intedm Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Man Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Manning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any interested party, Is imated to aftend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that induaes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Manning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened fa the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hewing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly a partly the Planning Commission s recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialMdustrui • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless Me applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may lake several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Manning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespla onmacresentative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the protect with any interested personjs). • Because the Manning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes aretaken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included In the report to the City Council. M you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Manning Staff person named on the ratification. 0 0 BRENT R & KATHLEEN A MILLER CALVENTE BERRIOS NIMROD 1200 LYMAN BLVD 1071 LYMAN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9168 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8535 CHANHASSEN 212 LP DAVID M JACOBSON 5270 HOWARDS POINT RD 1100 LAKE SUSAN DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8368 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9497 DZUNG HOANG NGUYEN GEORGE J JR & LISA A CEASER 1081 LYMAN CT 1091 LYMAN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8535 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8535 GRANT C MORRISON JAYME D & CAROL R LEE 1060 LYMAN CT 1380 OAKSIDE CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8535 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9005 KENT B & LORI BETH WARNBERG KURT A & SARAH J FERDERER 1111 LYMAN CT 1090 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8535 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9406 MATTHEW L KUTZ MICHAEL D TIMM 1080 LYMAN CT 1101 LYMAN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8535 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8535 RICKY JOSEPH BARTHEL ROBERT J & FRANCINE H JOHNSON 1090 LYMAN CT 1300 OAKSIDE CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8535 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9005 CARVER COUNTY 602 4TH ST E CHASKA, MN 55318-2102 DUANE R SKLUZACEK 1190 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-9166 GORDON E & ARLENE M SCHULZ 1100 LYMAN CT CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-8535 JOHN E & BRENDA L HILL 1360 OAKSIDE CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9005 MARK A & REBECCA L ERICKSON 1110 LAKE SUSAN DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9497 RICHARD L & LINDA C NELSON 1070 LYMAN CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8535 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRAN ST PAUL, MN 55155-1801 Certificate of Survey -for - Duane Skluzacek 1190 Lyman BLVD. Chanhassen, MN 55317 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Lot 2, Block 2, HILLSIDE OAKS, Carver County, Minnesota. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me m under my direct supervision and that I am a duty licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. -,r, 2270 2270.3 00/10115 Steven V. Ische License No Date -+Yh AN--86HLEVAR&- _ - _ - _ _ _ _ N 0 O P e w as SCANNED OREMIER LAND SURVEYING. LLC 952-"3.3010 0 0 • 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2015.15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 18, 2015, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of. this hearing is to consider a request for a variance to the wetland setback to relocate a septic system on property zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) and located at 1190 Lyman Boulevard. Applicant/ Owner: Duane Skluzack. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen. mn.us/2015-15 or at City Hall during regular business hours. to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Drew Ingvalson, Planning Intern Email: dmgvaLson@ ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1132 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, August 6, 2015' No 4170) Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. '9 was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghllklmnopgrstuvwxyz LaurieA. Hartman Subscribed and swom before me on tbis qday of RUO.Se 2015 N blic olim E BARKESOTA01(J1116 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.59 per column inch SCANNED 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2015-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 18, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for a variance to the wetland setback to relocate a septic system on property zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) and located at 1190 Lyman Boulevard. Applicant/Owner: Duane Skluzack. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-15 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Drew Ingvalson, Planning Intem Email: din vgvalsonAci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1132 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on August 6, 2015) SCANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard oicITY OF CHANgASSEN Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline Agency Review Request Date: Agency Review Response Deadline: Date Application Filed: July 21, 2015 August 6, 2015 July 17, 2015 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Drew Ingvalson 952-227-1132 dingvalson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Assistant Planner Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60-Day Review Period Deadline: August 18, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. Se tember 14, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. September 15, 2015 Application: Request for wetland setback Variance to relocate septic system on property zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) and located at 1190 Lyman Boulevard. Applicant/Owner: Duane Skluzacek Planning Case: 2015-15 1 Web Page: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-15 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: Federal Agencies: Adjacent Cities: ❑ Attorney ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Chaska ® Building Official ❑ US Fish & Wildlife ❑ Eden Prairie ® Engineer ❑ Jackson Township ® Fire Marshal Watershed Districts: ❑ Minnetonka ® Forester El Shorewood ® Park Director El Carver County El Victoria ® Water Resources El Lower MN Riverr ❑ Minnehaha Creek Adjacent Counties: ® Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Carver County Agencies: ❑ Hennepin ❑ Community Development Utilities: ❑ Scott ❑ Engineer ® Environmental Services F] Cable TV — Mediacom V School Districts: ❑ Electric— Minnesota Valley oto El Historical Society E3Electric — Xcel Energy E3Eastern Carver County 112 El Parks El 8 Water Conservation District El Magellan Pipeline E) Minnetonka 276 ❑ Natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy State Agencies: ❑ Phone — CenturyLink Other Agencies: El Board of Water &Soil Resources E]Hennepin County Regional Railroad El Authority ❑ Landscape Arboretum ❑ Historical Society So Transit ❑ Natural ❑ Resources-Forestry TC&W Railrost ad ❑ TC&W Railroad ❑ Natural Resources-Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control ❑ Transportation SCANNED 0 WACHHOLZ INC. 0 952-442-9323 — Phone 100 East Lake Street 952-442-1032 - Fax Waconia, MN 55387 612-802-2903 - Cell email: waconialand@yahoo.com MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS LICENSE NO. 188 - WACHHOLZ INC. WAYNE & BETTY WACHHOLZ, DESIGNER II INVOICE NO. 15-1178 Date: 07/07/15 Terms: Upon receipt of test CLIENT. Duane R Skluzacek Linda M Murakami 3916 190th Street Lester Prairie, MN 55354 Phone: 612-747-2524 Property Address: 1190 Lyman Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 o Staked 3 Bedroom site o Re -staked 3 Bedroom site o Site Evaluation, Soil borings & testing o Design Septic System Total this Invoice: 75.00 150.00 $825.00 ''CANNFnL UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Septic System Management Plan for Above Grade Systems The goal of a septic system is to protect human health and the environment by properly treating wastewater before returning it to the environment. Your septic system is designed to kill harmful organisms and remove pollutants before the water is recycled back into our lakes, streams and groundwater. This management plan will identify the operation and maintenance activities necessary to ensure long- term performance of your septic system. Some of these activities must be performed by you, the homeowner. Other tasks must be performed by a licensed septic maintainer or service provider. However, it is YOUR responsibility to make sure all tasks get accomplished in a timely manner. The University of Minnesota's Septic System Owner's Guide contains additional tips and recommendations designed to extend the effective life of your system and save you money over time. Proper septic system design, installation, operation and maintenance means safe and clean water! Property owner Duane Skiuzacek Address 1190 Lyman Blvd, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Property ID R25.3530090 System Designer Wachholz Inc System installer Jim's Excavating /And'. Service Provider/Maintainer Jim'S Excavati Permitting Authority Permit # Phone 612-802-2903 Kleindl Phone 952-442-9282 Phone 952-442-9282 Phone Date Inspected Keep this Management Plan with your Septic System Owner's Guide. The Septic System Owner's Guide includes a folder designed to hold maintenance records including pumping, inspection and evaluation reports. Ask your septic professional to also: • Attach permit information, designer drawings and as-builts of your system, if they are available. • Keep copies of all pumping records and other maintenance and repair invoices with this document. • Review this document with your maintenance professional at each visit; discuss any changes in product use, activities or water -use appliances. For a copy of the Septic System Owner's Guide, call 1-800-876-8636 or go to http://Shop.extension.,mn.edu/ http://septic-umn.edu Version 11/03/2010 SCANNED -1- • Septic System Management Plan • UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA for Above Grade Systems Your Septic System ❑ ❑ ...nom System Type:&011 OIIIQIV*Q V* (Based on 1L11V Rules Chapter 7080.2200 — 2400) Number of bedrooms: Four (4) System capacity/ design flow (gpd): 600 Anticipated average daily flow (gpd): 600 Comments Business? _What type? 4�+aLc H+W< P`M, :m Specifics System is subject to operating permit* System uses UV disinfection unit* Type of advanced treatment unit *Additional Management Plan required Well Construction Well depth (ft): over 100 feet E]Cased well Casing depth: 0 Other (specify): Distance from septic (ft): greater than 50 feet Is the well on the design drawing?OY 0 N Septic Tank One tank Tank volume: gallons Pump Tank t•000 gallons Does tank have two compartments?O1' ON ❑ Effluent Pump make/model: Two tanks Tank volume: 2,000 gallons Pump capacity 38 GPM (3Tank is constructed of concrete TDH 16.1 Feet of head Effluent Screen type; Polyl-ok ❑ Alarm location Soil Treatment Area (STA) Mound/At-Grade area (width x length): 41.9 ft x 78.4 ft Cleanouts or inspection ports Rock bed size (width x length): 10 ft x 50 ft Surface water diversions Location of additional STA: Additional STA not available -2- UNIVERSITY • Septic System Management Plan • OF MINNESOTA for Above Grade Systems Homeowner Management Tasks These operation and maintenance activities are your responsibility. Use the chart on page 6 to track your activities. Identify the service intervals recommended by your system designer and your local government. The tank assessment for your system will be the shortest interval of these three intervals. Your Pumper/maintainer will determine if your tank needs to be pumped. System Designer: check every months Local Government: check every months My tank needs to be checked State Requirement: check every 36 months every months Seasonally or several times per year • Leaks. Check (listen, look) for leaks in toilets and dripping faucets. Repair leaks promptly. • Surfacing sewage. Regularly check for wet or spongy soil around your soil treatment area. If surfaced sewage or strong odors are not corrected by pumping the tank or fixing broken caps, call your service professional. Untreated sewage may make humans and animals sick. • Alarms. Alarms signal when there is a problem; contact your maintainer any time the alarm signals. • Lint filter. If you have a lint filter, check for lint buildup and clean when necessary. Consider adding one after washing machine. • Effluent screen. If you do not have one, consider having one added the next time the tank is cleaned. Annually • Water usage rate. A water meter can be used to monitor your average daily water use. Compare your water usage rate to the design flow of your system (listed on the next page). Contact your septic professional if your average daily flow over the course of a month exceeds 70% of the design flow for your system. • Caps. Make sure that all caps and lids are intact and in place. Inspect for damaged caps at least every fall. Fix or replace damaged caps before winter to help prevent freezing issues. • Water conditioning devices. See Page 5 for a list of devices. When possible, program the recharge frequency based on water demand (gallons) rather than time (days). Recharging too frequently may negatively impact your septic system. • Review your water usage rate. Review the Water Use Appliance chart on Page 5. Discuss any major changes with your pumper/maintainer. During each visit by a pumper/maintainer Ask if your pumper/maintainer is licensed in Minnesota Make sure that your pumper/maintainer services the tank through the manhole. (NOT though a 4" or 6" diameter inspection port.) Ask your pumper/maintainer to accomplish the tasks listed on the Professional Tasks on Page 4. -3- • Septic System Management Plan • UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA for Above Grade Systems 410 Professional Management Tasks These are the operation and maintenance activities that a pumper/maintainer performs to help ensure long-term performance of your system. Professionals should refer to the O/M Manual for detailed checklists for tanks, pumps, alarms and other components. Call 800-322-8642 for more details. • Written record provided to homeowner after each visit. Plumbing/Source of Wastewater • Review the Water Use Appliance Chart on Page 5 with homeowner. Discuss any changes in water use and the impact those changes may have on the septic system. • Review water usage rates (if available) with homeowner. Septic Tank/Pump Tanks • Manhole lid. A riser is recommended if the lid is not accessible from the ground surface. Insulate the riser cover for frost protection. • Liquid level. Check to make sure the tank is not leaking. The liquid level should be level with the bottom of the outlet pipe, (If the water level is below the bottom of the outlet pipe, the tank may not be watertight. If the water level is higher than the bottom of the outlet pipe of the tank, the effluent screen may need cleaning, or there may be ponding in the drainfield.) • Inspection pipes. Replace damaged caps. • Baffles. Check to make sure they are in place and attached, and that inlet/outlet baffles are clear of buildup or obstructions. • Effluent screen. Check to make sure it is in place; clean per manufacturer recommendation. Recommend retrofitted installation if one is not present. • Alarm. Verify that the alarm works. • Scum and sludge. Measure scum and sludge in each compartment of each septic and pump tank, pump if needed. Pump • Pump and controls. Check to make sure the pump and controls are operating correctly. • Pump vault. Check to make sure it is in place; clean per manufacturer recommendations. • Alarm, Verify that the alarm works. • Drainback. Check to make sure it is operating properly. • Event counter or run time. Check to see if there is an event counter or run time log for the pump, If there is one, calculate the water usage rate and compare to the anticipated average daily flow listed on Page 2. Soil Treatment Area • Inspection pipes. Check to make sure they are properly capped. Replace caps that are damaged. • Surfacing of effluent. Check for surfaced effluent or other signs of problems. • Lateral flushing. Check lateral distribution; if cleanouts exist, flush and clean as needed. • Ponding. Check for ponding. Excessive ponding in at -grade and mound beds indicates problems. All other components — inspect as listed here: EFFLUENT FILTERS: Maintenance Requirements. Homeowner must clean the screen after the alarm sounds. WARNING: If the screen is not properly maintained, the sewage could back up in house. -4- UNIVERSITY Septic System Management Plan OF MINNESOTA for Above Grade Systems Water -Use Appliances and Equipment in the Home Appliance Impacts on System Management Tips •Uses additional water.Use of a garbage disposal is not recommended. Garbage disposal Adds solids to the tank. • Minimize garbage disposal use. Compost instead. • Finely -ground solids may not settle. Unsettled solids can exit the tank • To prevent solids from exiting the tank, have your and enter the soil treatment area. tank pumped more frequently. • Add an effluent screen to your tank. • Washing several loads on one day • Choose a front -loader or water -saving top -loader, uses a lot of water and may overload these units use less water than older models. your system. • Overloading Limit the addition of extra solids to your tank by Washing machine your system may prevent solids from settling out in using a liquid or easily biodegradable detergents. the tank. Unsettled solids can exit . Install a ling filter after the washer and an effluent the tank and enter the soil treatment screen on your tank. area. • Wash only full loads. • Limit use of bleach -based detergents. • Think even — spread your laundry loads throughout the week. 2nd floor laundry • The rapid speed of water entering the tank may reduce performance. • Install an effluent screen in the septic tank to prevent the release of excessive solids to the soil treatment area. • Be sure that you have adequate tank capacity. • Powdered and/or high -phosphorus detergents can negatively impact the • Use gel detergents. Powdered detergents may add Dishwasher Performance of your tank and soil solids to the tank. treatment area • Use detergents that are low or no -phosphorus. • New models promote "no scraping". Wash only full loads. They have a garbage disposal inside. ' Scrape your dishes anyways to keep undigested solids out of your septic system. Grinder pump (in • Finely -ground solids may not settle. Unsettled solids can exit the tank • Expand septic tank capacity by a factor of 1.5. home) and enter the soil treatment area, • Include pump monitoring in your maintenance schedule to ensure that it is working Properly. • Add an effluent screen. Large bathtub • Large volume of water may overload your system. • Avoid using other water -use appliances at the (whirlpool) • Heavy use of bath oils and soaps can same time. For example, don't wash clothes and take a bath at the same time. impact biological activity in your tank and soil treatment area. • Use oils, soaps, and cleaners in the bath or shower sparingly. Clean Water Uses Impacts on System Management Tips High -efficiency furnace • Drip may result in frozen pipes during cold weather. • Re-route water into a sum P pump or directly out of the house. Do not route furnace recharge to your septic system. Water softener Salt in recharge water may affect system performance. These sources produce water that is not sewage Iron filter Reverse osmosis mayand • Rechazge water may hydraulically should not go into your septic system. Reroute water from these sources to another overload the system. outlet, such as a dry well, draintile or old drainfield. Surface drainage • Water from these sources will likely overload the system. • When replacing consider using a demand -based Footing drains recharge vs. a time -based recharge. • Check valves to ensure proper operation; have wit serviced per manufacturer directions - 5 - i UNIVERSITY Septic System Management Plan " OF MINNESOTA for Above Grade Systems Maintenance Log Track maintenance activities here for easy reference. See list of management tasks on pages 3 and 4. Activity Date accomplished Check frequently: Leaks: check for plumbing leaks Soil treatment area check for surfacing Lint filter: check, clean if needed Effluent screen: if owner -maintained Check annually: Water usage rate (monitor frequency_) Caps: inspect, replace if needed Water use appliances — review use Other: Notes: Mitigation/corrective action plan: `As the owner of this SSM, Z understand it is my responsibility to properly operate and maintain the sewage treatment system on this property, utilizing the Management plan. Zf requirements in this Management Plan are not met, Z will promptly notify the permitting authority and take necessary corrective actions. Zf Z have a new system, i agree to adequately protect the reserve area for future use as a soil treatment system.' i Ilaie —SCS Management Plan Prepared By: WachholZ In Certification # L 188 Permitting Authority, 02010 Regents of the University of Minnewta. All rights reserved The University of Minnesota is an equal opponwity educator and employer. This material is available in alternative formats upon request. Contact the Water Resources Center, 612-6244182. The Onsite Sewage Treatment Prognun is delivered by the University of Mirmewta Extension Service and the University of Minnesota Water Resources Center. es� Property Owner File ❑ County Zoning Office ❑ Installer Bid Copy WACHHOLZ INC. 952-442-9323 — Phone 100 East Lake Street 952-442-1032 - Fax Waconia MN 55387 612-802-2903 - Cell email: waconialand@yahoo.com MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEMS LICENSE NO. 188 - WACHHOLZ INC. WAYNE 8 BETTY WACHHOLZ, DESIGNER II PERCOLATION TESTING, SOIL BORINGS, & SITE EVALUATION CLIENT: Duane R Skluzacek Linda M Murakami 3916 190th Street Lester Prairie, MN 55354 Property Address: 1190 Lyman Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 PHONE: 612-747-2524 No. 15 -1178 June 6, 2015 SITE LOCATION: Parcel ID No. R25.3530090 3.5 Acres - Hillside Oaks Lot 002 Block 002 Section 23 Township 116N, Range 023W Carver County, Chanhassen, Minnesota 4 Bedroom - Mound design SCANNED 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Blvd., PO Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Permit# Phone: 952-227-1180 Fax: 952-227-1190 SUBSURFACE SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM PERMIT APPLICATION Site jjQ0 ma rl $(�/A Address �+, XResidential Date /- 5 ❑ Commercial �O l� /5 Owner Work phone Home phone 1)tke, SKIVZace/< Contractor Jim's �xc� va 4ddress I a I7tj CD Q_ 5/ 030 oAhp_. M/ J54s Phone Number -z92(v 141 V Mound ❑ Trench ❑ Clothes Washer ❑ Dishwasher Number of bedrooms Future bedrooms 3allons per day 'ercolation rate site Z Shoreland ❑ At Grade ❑ Chamber IFarbage Disposal SP2 JOB VALUATION 4 Other Water Softener Fee Schedule Please see back of this permit application for the fee schedule PERMIT M.P.I. FEE Plan review fee Jeither 65% of permit fee Required information to be filed with application State surcharge = value X 0005 ❑ Two copies of site plan/survey drawn to scale ❑ Two copies of complete onsite sewage TOTAL system design PERMIT ❑ Two copies of soil boring logs FEE g/safley/insylorm/SSTS permit app f7 V F P Rev. 12/77 rnone 1a-Affm M� Lic. Number 1.-/88 Property ;] Single dwelling ❑ Multi le Dwelling p g ED] Industrial Type ❑ Commercial Other Use of building: Work ❑ New ®Replacement (new) ❑ Rehab/Repair 141 V Mound ❑ Trench ❑ Clothes Washer ❑ Dishwasher Number of bedrooms Future bedrooms 3allons per day 'ercolation rate site Z Shoreland ❑ At Grade ❑ Chamber IFarbage Disposal SP2 JOB VALUATION 4 Other Water Softener Fee Schedule Please see back of this permit application for the fee schedule PERMIT M.P.I. FEE Plan review fee Jeither 65% of permit fee Required information to be filed with application State surcharge = value X 0005 ❑ Two copies of site plan/survey drawn to scale ❑ Two copies of complete onsite sewage TOTAL system design PERMIT ❑ Two copies of soil boring logs FEE g/safley/insylorm/SSTS permit app f7 V F P Rev. 12/77 0 0 NtLIVItNT: I, the undersigned applicant and licensed contractor hereby make application an onsite sewage disposal system permit, agreeing that all such work herein specified ill be done in strict compliance with ordinances and regulations of Chanhassen and all Is and regulations of the State of Minnesota. The undersigned agree that the plot, i, system design, and specifications submitted and which are approved by Chanhassen :cher with any additional conditions or restrictions shall become a part of the permit. undersigned further agrees that no part of the system shall be covered until it has n inspected and approved and further agree that is the responsibility of the ersigned to notify the inspector that the job is ready for inspection. This ication is for a sewage system at a specific location on the site and with specific s. Any deviation from the a roved location or Ian will cause the permit to become void. atu f applicant Date FEE SCHEDULE $$50010.0t0o $24so.0..20 t$ $24.20 for the first $500.00 plus $3.15 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00 $2001.00 to $25,000.00 $71.35 for the first $2,000.00 plus $14.00 for each additional $1,000.0o, or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $403.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus $10.40 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $663.05 for the first $50,000.00 plus $7.20 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,023.55 for the first $100,000.0o plus $5.75 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $500,000.00 $3,330.75 for the first $500,000.00 plus $4.90 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,Ooo,00o.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $5,777.00 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $3.75 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof Public Health de Environment Division Environmental Services Department Government Center Subsurface Sewage Treatment System IAD Fourth Street East w Chaska, MN 55318 Construction Permit Application CARVER COUNTY 952-361-1820 sstsOco.carversrin.us Property Owner: I ,(�.Qi• 1 J ! \ .0 7Jf f e Jlrr,Q.. a1, aoI5 L {� Date: / /� Site Address: -�(J 144=&n 1311') . Cha nha 5gg, Mn/ -5. 3(7 Phone: &A-%7 71d-5 Mailing Address: `e Ilp(�'%1-� +-1 /_ost' e- rairre( CY/f�f jet ,35� PID Number(s):/� `�,3 530oq o Email: �[� 6e i72/ 6'x- nn 5W & Q CI D nil _ System Type ❑New Construction' replacement„ 'Entire preps of the Primary and A/r SSTS must be protected from disturbance, compaction, or other doman oge by installing snow or sift fencing when there is y other comtrucrion proposed on the property.tV. mer Provided Information Types) of UseResidential DCommerclal OOther (Specify) Number of Bedrooms fitAAalfrobir) Current + —_Pmv posetl Total Number of Occupants 'Adultt _Minors ❑Home Extended Busfness (Spxify) F]Daycare (Specify) Existing Flow Measurements Dyes(PleaseAttach) Fl.. Water- Using Devices Garbage Disposal Dishwasher Water Softener' (Check all that apply) Sewage Elector or Grinder Pump Sump Pump• Iron Filter' Large Bathtub/Jacuzzi Hot Tub' High Efficiency furnace' 'Clear Water Source Laundry/Large Tub on 2nd Floor Other (Specify) Water Use Comems Faucet/Tollet leaksMultiple Loads of Laundry/Day pplyl B (Check all that aB BLong-Term Prescription Meds No Lint Screen Use of Anti Bacterial Soap Frequent Enten,infng-Out of Town Guests Any additional current or future uses (Specify) Any non -sewage discharges to system (Specify) Prellminary site information Active Wells k: Inactive or Abandoned Wells p: Well (Pim# umcAWell Smllig Records) Information Depthof Welt(s):. - ft. Depth of Welt Cesing151 ft. MN Unique Well Id p: Property Lines: Determined and Approved by Client ❑Approximate Property Lines Surveyed Setbacks:, Property Lines IzZater Supply Pipes ❑OHWL Other Buildings Easements Well s I) The above Preliminary Site Information, including perty line and setback locations, has been Identified by the Property dwmrY Approval(IN[lall property owner or su eyed, and reviewed by all parties. [f�' Det /gnrit Approml(InitlalJ Installer's Approval (InItIq) shnaturm I hereby acknowledge that ave readthis is ion an tNat all Information Is true and correct to the best of my knowledg e..�ate yyy (Property Owners signature) ;Minn�ota I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that all Information is true and correct to the lest of my knowledge. I further agree that med will be in accordance with the approved plans, spedNcatlons and conditions, and to abide by all of the ordinance of Carver County and the Laws of the State oarding actions taken pursuant to this permit. Wird GrT 11V (Designer) (Designeh sl'natwe) (Dace) (Llan#P) (Installer) pnsteileri signature) (Date) Ilicpnu X) DOCumenl Revised 5114114 UNIVERSITY OF 141NNESOTp P Preliminary Evaluation Form M I. Conten Information LL V 03.19.15 Property Owner/clfant: Duane Skluaacek Client Phone Number: 612J47-2529 Mailing Address 3916 190th Sq Lester Prairie, MN 55354 Project 1D: 154190 Site Address 1190 Lyman Blvd, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Legal Description 3.5 Ac. Sec 23, TWp 116N, R025W,Chanhassen Parcel ID: 825.3530090 latitude 44.50.465N Longitudel 093.33.084W Evalustion for system type ONewcahm,cupn $kepymnem Date 2� Z. Flow Information CllentArol In ormatlon Types)a we (all that apply) _CI geNentlal ❑Comercial ❑Dow(Spedly) No. of bedrooms' (if appikable) (aur (4) Unfinished space (fit) No. of residents In home Adults 11Chltdren Teenagers EaBNng flow measurements O Yes (u Yes, aaem rwadhgs) Oft 0Garbage Disposal ❑Water SalterM ❑Iran Pger� Water -using delces(check oil that ❑Dbhw C3 Sump P.V ---Other-(specify) - apply) ❑ urge aathwe/Iecuul ❑ Hqn Eekkrey Furta2' ❑ I Uhdrvtesm Tub on 2M floor C] Hct TVD' ' Clear Water source Water use Concerns (check all that O Finaw(/rolet testi O HuMN! umas M Is~p, ❑ uhv Tam Presuiplbn t apply) ❑ use anMtl6X¢fbl Soap Om -Here 6uskess C3 ft un suan ❑fmquent EnWomnoaarta-town twese MY additional current or future uses an this parcel (specify) Any non -sewage discharges to system (speclfy ) Sewage ejector or grinder Pump in hornet O Yes IS No i I acknowledge the above is tampte, and accurate T �--Y' (C)lent(s) signature and date) D"18110' -determined Flow Information !llsss A. Estimated Design Flow (gallons per day) Anticipated waste strength v Lues: 2Pamauc soagsh ONgh RueVh BOD:�mSIL CBOD:mg/L (l5S):�mg/L OBG:SIL 3. Preliminary Site information 8(1). Water supply wells) within 100 It of absorption area ElYes O+ No Wells) Were located El coact Wwvaum O count, wee hie[ Wps ❑ Panoral Gam,unketlon MN Unique Well Id a: Depth of wells) it Well casing depth(s) Required Setback: it Source ft ImpeMous layer Elft O Yes If Yes, Define 8 Source: � SM. Site Within 300 it of noncommunity transient supply well O Yes Oft Source 8(3). Site Within a drinking water supply management area 0Y. [11 No Source 8(4). Location 01111 eAstthg and prop`0sad buildings end'linp(ovemehts on lot (see Site Evaluotlon map) 8(3). Burled water supply Pipes within 50 It of proposed system Oyes 121 No C. Location of all memants on lot (see Site Evaluation mop) Source D. Elevation of ordinary high water Ievel (OWHL) - MN DNR (if adjacent to parcel) E. Floodplain designation and flood eiwation ISource F. Determine property lines (see Site Evoluatian map) 13 m 0 m Nap❑sone,. Site located in a shoreland district/area ❑Yes 21w G. Distance of setbacks'Property unes ❑DHWL fyJwab wpph� suaakps OFa<mmm X"s) UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA #P Preliminary Evaluation Form /M H. Sol( Survey Information (from web soil survey) '0 Map Map Units on parcel KE2: Lester -Kilkenny Loams List landforms Summit Slope Range t to 1 percent Parent materials -check all that apply Landform Position (check all that apply ) Fl7 u21 m D lacuraka D AIWavn O win QI Sum t SlauWer 0 aaUalope D rpoakee Cl Pian DOumsen ❑Ines 0aedw ❑ppank I DDegesyn 05aexNrertace Dranmede El T. Sbpe Minimum bedrock depth: inches Minimum bedrock depth:❑Inches Maximum bedrock depth:❑inches Maximum bedrock depth-.0Inches Septic Tank Absorption Field - Trench (MN) Map Unit Ratings Septic Tank Absorption Field - At -grade (MN) Septic Tank Absorption Field - Mound (MN) 4. Preliminary Soil profile Information (from web soil survey Enter information here or attach map and description. Map Unit Other Depth Texture(s) Structure(s) Consistence Restrictions Color Horizon I Horizm 2 Horizon 3 Horizon 4 Horizon 5 Map Unit Other Depth Texturels) Structure(s) Consistence Restrictions Color Horizon 1 Horizon 2 Horizon 3 Horzm 4 Horizon 5 Map Mit Other Depth Textures) Structure(sl Consistence Restrictions Color Hoe z n 1 HoNzon Z Horizon 3 Horimn 4 Horizon 5 Map Unit Other Depth Texture(s) Stnstwe(s) Consistence Restrictions Color Horbron I Horizon 2 Horizon 3 Horizon 4 Horizon 5 5. Local Government Unit Information Name of LGU Carver County LGU Contact LGU-specific setbacks LGU-specific design requirements LGU-specific bista(Iation requirements I herebY certify that I have comdeted this work In accordance with all applicable ordinances, rules and laws. WACHHOLZ INC L-183 IDeskrxer) (Signature) (Licensee Datel /M Web Soil Survey M�� _—czM�c.nmlrtlmrars—•, Confect lie I subscribeArchived Soil Surveys � Sall survey Smug I Glossary I preterencb � Link I Logout I Help Ama of rnherecf .Ann Cnll Man CnH Mara Pvnlnmr nnwnlnaA Gae nNa GMnnlnn fart /C.aa\ Page 1 of 1 FOIA I Accessibility Statement I Privacy Policy I Non -Discrimination Statement I Information Quality I USA.gov I White House http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app[WebSoilSurvey.aspx 6/7/2015 • • Print"leyaMb/7L 04ji4o4aO r! n) Add mshoppinp CMtl Search Soil ® pMe�p�yy� 1'�J��J9JJJ3O111�(not la scale)V ��® Map Unit Legend Carver County, Minnesota (MN019) Map Map Unit Name Acres Pa cent Unit In of AOI symbol AOI GL Glencoe clay loam 0.2 2.4% E2 Lester -Kilkenny loams, 18 to 1.2 56.2% 25 percent slopes, eroded MK Houghton and Muskego sills 0.8 36.4% Totals for Arae of Interest 2.2 100.0% o we Jt Warnirlp: Soil Mop may not be valid at this scale J You have zoomed In beyond the scale at which the soil map for this area Is Intended to be used. Mayping of solis is done at a particular scale. The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. The design of map units and the level of detail shown In the resulting soil map are dependent on that map scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps S do not show the small areas of contrasting sells that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. FOIA I Accessibility Statement I Privacy Policy I Non -Discrimination Statement I Information Quality I USA.gov I White House http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app[WebSoilSurvey.aspx 6/7/2015 • • UNIVERSITY • OF,MINNESOTA OSTP Field Evaluation Form 1. vnucs mrormatlon Project ID: 15-1190 v 03.19.15 Property Owner/Client Duane Skluncek Client Phone Number: 612.747-2524 Address 1190 Lyman Blvd, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Date 6/6/2015 Weather Conditions Sunny B clear 2. Utility and Structure Information - Utility Locations Identified O copier state Ore cat a r�� O Any Prate uplalat Property Linesoeeevurea aM ApprwM by Ok Client's Approval (initial) J� ❑ De neat but ret App w �V OMpsorlmate ❑ Pmpely Lines Surveyed Locate and Verify (see Site Evolua ZE ti map) xlsdng Buildings ❑ImPmvements Ofasannts O+Setbacks 3. Site Information Percent Slope ly 0Slope Direction East Landscape Position S hau ( S(ope Shape linear, linear Vegetation type(s) Woo Evidence of cut, fill, compacted or disturbed areas O Yes No Discuss the flooding or run-on potential of site Identify benchmarks and elevations (Site Evaluation Map ) Proposed soil treatment area adequately protected ® yes ❑ No 1. General Solis information Original sells gym 0 N Type of observation O Sol Probe SSaa 6orop Shc Pa Number of soil observations three (3) Soil observations were conducted in the proposed system location Laves ❑ No A soil observation was made within the most limiting area of thheeproposed system vee O No Soil boring log forms completed and attached LJ 1.. ONO Percolation tests performed, forms completed and attached ha Yes O No 5. Phase I. Reporting Information Depth to standing water inches Anticipated construction Issues Flood elevation feet Depth to bedrock inches Depth to periodically saturated soil 20 inches Maximum depth of system Mound inches Elevation at system bottom feet Differences between soil survey and field evaluation Percolation rate min/inch Loading rate 1.2 gpd/ft' Contour loading rate 2 gpd/ft Site evaluation issues / comments I hereby certify that I have completed this work in accordance with all ]applicable ordinances, rules and laws. WACHHOLZ INC W�/Lyn / / / L-188 (Designer) 'r/s� (S(Signlllat/uurerree) (License k) (Date) [4VA Job No. 15-117k Name: '0a&,?zz Sel& ZRGeAJ PID No. R 95 3_6300,Ib HOUSE Elevation: Bedrooms feet sludge Location ,!� G�) � PI'�c tank 100' Benchh mark: /�/ wnascApePosition: 7!!n oot Stone Toe SIope — ELEVATIONS: SB -1 SB -2 S13-3 IZ Date: < dam'"/f o-2j5�7/_f� Property address: ��QQ �Gyy>LQ� 61V4 Direction: Inspection pipes: too r • pump pipe length: a feet tank nk Rockbed size An Ft x --0 Ft Absorption Width: Upslope Elevation: 100 • Bottom of Rockbed: ��• 3 3 Elevation of limiting Layer: 96. 3;1 Sludge Tank: qg Slope: 14 % Pump Tank: q7 Slope direction � 57 UNIVERSITY OSTP Soil Observation Log OF MINNESOTA Project ID: 15-1190 v03.19.1s Client/ Address: 1190 Lyman Blvd, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Legal Description/ GPS: 3.5 Ac, Sec 23, Twp 116N, R025W,Chanhassen Soil parent material(s): (Check all that apply) ❑ outwash ❑ Lawstrine ❑ Loess mii ❑ aluNum ❑ Bedrock ❑ organic Matter Landscape Position: (check one) ❑ summit & houlder ❑ Back/Side slope ❑ root slope ❑ Toe slope Slope shape linear, linear Vegetation Woods Soil survey map units KE2: Lester-Kilk Slope% 14.0 Elevation: 99.3 Weather Conditions/Time of Day: Sunny @ Clear Date 06/06/15 Observation #/Location: SB -1 - North Observation Type: Auger Depth (in) Texture Rock Frag. % Matrix Colors) Mottle Colors) Redox Kinds) Indicator(s) I-------- Structure -----------I Shape Grade Consistence 0-9- Loam 10YR 2/1 Granular Moderate Friable 9" - 20" Clay Loam 10YR 4/4 Blocky Moderate Firm 20" - 36" Clay Loam 2.5YR 5/4 7.5YR 4/3 Depletions Si Blocky Moderate Firm Comments I hereby certify that I have completed this work in accordance With allapplicable ordinanc s, rules and laws. / / /j7 L-188 6/27/2015 WACHHOLZ INC Aar (Designer/ Inspector) (Signature) License # (Date) • • Additional Soil Observation Logs ProiectlD: 15-119n ATMENT Client/ Address: 1190 Lyman Blvd, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Legal Description/ GPS: 3.5 Ac, Sec 23, Twp 116N, R025W,Chanhassen Soil parent material(s): (Check all that apply) out -ash ❑ Laaztrdne ❑ Loess CYdnil ❑ Alluvium ❑ Bedrock ❑ Organic Matter �❑ Landscape Position: (check one) ❑ summit tl� shoulder ❑ Badyside Slope ❑ root slope ❑ Toe Slope Slope shape linear, linear Vegetation Woods Soil survey map units KE2: Lester -Kill S[ope%II 14.0 Elevation: 99.8 Weather Conditions/Time of Day: Sunny Q Clear Date 06/06/15 Observation #/Location: SB - 2 - Center Observation Type: Auger Depth (in) Texture Rock Frag. % Matrix Color(s) Mottle Color(s) Redox Kind(s) Indicator(s) I-------- Structure ----------1 Shape Grade Consistence Loam 10YR 2/1 -- - - — Granular Moderate Friable 11" - 26" Clay Loam 1.OYR 4/4 — Blocky Moderate Firm 26" - 36" Clay Loam 2.5YR 5/4 7.5YR 4/3 Depletions S1 Blocky Moderate Firm Comments Observation #/Location: SB -3- South Observation Type: Auger Depth (in) Texture Rock Frag. % Matrix Color(s) Mottle Colors) Redox Kind(s) Indicator(s) I-------- Structure -----------1 Shape Grade Consistence 0.12" Loam 10YR 2/1 Granular Moderate Friable 12" - 20" Clay Loam 10YR 4/4 Blocky Moderate Firm 20" - 36" Clay Loam 2.5YR 5/4 7.5YR 4/3 Depletions S1 Blocky Moderate Firm Comments • • OSTP Percolation lata Sheet UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA u 1. Contact Information Project D. 15-1190 v 03.19.15 Property Owner/Client: IDuaneSkluzacek Address: I f190 Lyman Blvd, Chanhassen, MN 55317 2. General erco atton Intormation Diameter in Date prepared and/or soaked: 6/27/15 Method of scratching sidewall: 2" X 4" board with nail Is pre-soak required'? es Not required in sandy soils Soak* start time: 8:00 AM Soak' end 12;00 PM time: 4:00 hrs of soak Method to maintain 12 in of water during soak re -fill J. Percolation I est Data Test hole: 1/1 Location: North Date reading taken: 6/28/15 Elevation: Starting time: 1:10 PM Depth": 12 inches Soil texture descri tion: Depth (in) Soil Texture " 12 inches for mounds & at -grades, 0 - 9" Loam depth of absorption area for trenches & 9" - 12" Cla Loam beds Reading Start Time End Time Start Reading End Reading Perc rate % Difference (In) (in) (mpi) Last 3 Rates Pass 1 1:10 PM 1:30 PM 8.00 5.00 6.7 21:30 PM 1:50 PM 8.00 5.75 8.9 3 150 PM 2:10 PM 8.00 5.75 8.9 410 o NNAINA PM 2:30 PM 8.00 5.75 8.9 5 es Chosen Percolation Rate for Test Hole N1 g -g mpi Additional percolation test data may be included on attached pages Design Percolation Rate (maximum of all tests) = 10.00 mpi I hereby certify that I have completed this work in accordance wi al pplicable ordinances, rules and laws. WACHHOLZ INC L-188 06/27/15 Desi ner nature License # Date u Additional Percolation Data U1lIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Test hole: #2 Location: South 6/28/15 Starting time: 1;11 PM Depth**: 12 inches I texture description: 12 in. for mounds & at -grades, Depth (in) Soil Texture depth of absorption area for trenches 0 - 11" Loam and beds 11" • 12" Clay Loam Reading StartTime End Time Start Reading in End Reading, in Perc rate (mpi) % Difference 1 Last 3 Rates Pass 1 1:10 PM 1:30 PM 8.00 5.75 8.9 NA NA 2 130 PM 1:50 PM 8.00 6.00 10.0 NA NA 3 1:50 PM 2:10 PM 8.00 6.00 10.0 11.1 No 4 2:10 PM 2:30 PM 8.00 6.00 10.0 0.0 Yes 5 Chosen Percolation Rate for Test Hole #2 10.0 mpi Test hole: #3 Date reading taken:�� Starting time: texture description: Location: Elevation: Depth": Dinches 12 in. for mounds & at -grades, depth of absorption area for trenches and beds Reading Start Time End Time Start Reading End Reading Perc rate % Difference''' Pass (in) (in) (mpi) Last 3 Rates 1 NA NA 2 NA NA 3 Rate for Test Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 0 OSTP Design 0 Summary Worksheet UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Property Owner/Client: I Duane Skluzacek Project ID: 151778 v 03.19.15 Site Address: 1190 Lyman Blvd, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Date: 6/27/75 1. DESIGN FLOW AND TANKS A. Design Flow: 600 Gallons Per Day (GPD) Note: The estimated design flow is considered a peak flow rate including a safety factor. For long term performance, the average B. Septic Tanks: dailylow is recommended to be < J 60% of this value. Minimum Code Required Septic Tank Capacity: 2000 Gallons, in Tanks or Compartments Recommended Septic Tank Capacity: =2000 Gallons, in Tanks or Compartments Effluent Screen: Yes Alarm: Yes C. Holding Tanks Only: Minimum Code Required Capacity: Gallons, in Tanks Designer Recommended Capacity: E=Gallons, in Tanks Type of High Level Alarm: D. Pump Tank 1 Capacity (Code Minimum): 7000 Gallons Pump Tank 2 Capacity (Code Minimum): Gallons Pump Tank 1 Capacity (Designer Recy 1000 Gallons Pump Tank 2 Capacity (Designer Recy Gallons Pump 1 38.0 GPM Total Head 76.1 ft Pump 2GPM Total Head it Supply Pipe Dia. EKI in Dose Volume: 150.0 gat Supply Pipe Dia. =in Dose Volume: =gal 2. SYSTEM TYPE 0 Trench 0 era OO Nana 0 At -Grade 0 Gravity Dtw boson OO Pressure omnlwmn to d 0 Nre otsmwnoo-um M 0 two 0 Hdakp rank 0 txtx Selection Required Benchmark Elevation: 100.00 it Benchmark Location: NE Comer of House System Type Type of Distribution Media: m Type I ❑ Type I I ❑ Type Ill ❑ Type IV ❑ Type V 0 Dainreid Rod ❑ Regbtved Treatment Media: 3. SITE EVALUATION: A. Depth to Limiting Layer: 20 in =ft B. Measured Land Slope %: 14.0 % C. Elevation of Limiting Layer. 98.1 —� D. Soil Texture: Loam E. Loc. of Restricive Elevation:1SB-2: Center Boring F. Soil Hyd. Loading Rate: 0.60 GPD/ftt G. Minimum Required Separation: 36 in 3.0 it H. Perc Rate: 10.0 MPI I. Code Maximum Depth of System: Mound in Comments: 4. DESIGN SUMMARY Trench Design Summary Dispersal Area�ftt Sidewall Depthin Trench Widthit Total Lineal Feet =ft Number of Trenches Code Maximum Trench Depthin Contour Loading Rate= ft Designers Max Trench Depthin Bed Design Summary Absorption Areaft: Depth of sidewallin Code Maximum Bed Depthin Bed WidthE=ft Bed Length E=ft Designers Max Bed DepthIn 0 • Minnesota Pollution wnwm 0 OSTP Design r Summary Worksheet UNIVERSITY ur 1V1IININMJV IA aaaamw Q`Z Mound Design Summary Absorption Bed Area 500.0 ftI Bed Length 50.0 ft Bed Width 10.0 ft Absorption Width 26.0 ft Clean Sand Lift 1.3 ft Berm Width (0-1%)ft UPSIOPe Berm Width 7,1 ft Downslope Berm Width 24.8 ft Endslope Berm Width 14.2 ft Total System Length 78.4 ft Total System Width 41.9 it Contour Loading Rate 12.0 gal/ft At -Grade Design Summary Absorption Bed WidthE=ft Absorption Bed Length E=ft System Heightft Contour Loading Rategal/ft Upslope Berm Width�ft Downslope Berm Widthft Endslope Bemi Width ft System Length E=ft System Width =ft Level &Equal Pressure Distribution Summary No. of Perforated Laterals Perforation Spacingft Perforation Diameter 1 /4 in Lateral Diameter 2.00 in Min. Delivered Volume 98 gal Maximum Delivered Volume 150 gal Non -Level and Unequal Pressure Distribution Summary ElevatiM(ft) (ft)n) ion Size Spacing (ft) Spacing (in) Lateral 1 Lateral2 Lateral 3 Lateral4 Lateral 5 Lateral 6 Additional Info for Type IV/Pretreatment A. Calculate the organic loading Minimum Delivered Volume LIgal Maximum Delivered Volume gal 1. Organic Loading to Pretreatment Unit - Design Flaw X Estimated BOD in mg/L in the effluent X 8.35 + 1,000,000 �]gpd X mg/L X 8.35 + 1,000,000 - Olbs BOD/day 2. Type of Pretreatment Unit Being Installed: 3. Calculate Soil Treatment System Organic Loading: BOD concentration after pretreatment + Bottom Area = lbs/day/ftI �mg/L X 8.35 + 1,000,000 + E=ft2 . E=lbs/day/ftl I hereby certify that I have completed this work in accordance with all appllc ble ordinances, rules and laws. WACHHOLZ INC ( L-188 (Designer) gnature) (License #) 06/27/15 (Date) Minnesota Pollution AP Mound Design r /� UNIVERSITY 1 WnrLchnnt 0/ CInlrne (P N4immr7cn-rA "'. Control Agency � % - e IV ✓ l w jo < .,. lo�,�� 1. SYSTEM SIZING: Project ID: 15-1178 v 03.19.15 A. Design Flow: 600 GPD B. Soil Loading Rate: 0.60 ]GPD /ft, C. Depth to Limiting Condition: 1.7 ft D. Percent Land Slope: 14.0 % E. Design Media Loading Rate: 1.2 GPD/ft' F. Mound Absorption Ratio: 2.60 Systems with these values are not Type I systems. Contour Loading Rate (linear loading rate) is a recommended value. 2. DISPERSAL MEDIA SIZING A. Calculate Dispersal Bed Area: Design Flow + Design Media Loading Rate = ft2 600 GPD + 1.2 GPD/ft2 = 500 ft If a larger dispersal media area is desired, enter size:ft2 B. Enter Dispersal Bed Width: 10.0 ft Can not exceed 10 feet C. Calculate Contour Loading Rate: Bed Width X Design Media Loading Rate 10 ft X 1.2 GPD/ft2 = 12.0 gal/ft Can not exceed Table 1 D. Calculate Minimum Dispersal Bed Length: Dispersal Bed Area + Bed Width = Bed Length 500 ft2 + 10.0 ft = 50.0 ft 3. ABSORPTION AREA SIZING A. Calculate Absorption Width: Bed Width X Mound Absorption Ratio = Absorption Width 10.0 ft X 2.6 = 2b.0 it B. For slopes >1%, the Absorption Width is measured downhill from the upslope edge of the Bed. Calculate Downslope Absorption Width: Absorption Width - Bed Width 26.0 ft - 10.0 it = 16.0 ft 4. DISTRIBUTION MEDIA: ROCK A. Media Volume: Media Depth below and above pipe X Length X Width 1.00 it X 50.0 ft X 10.0 ft = 500 ft' + 27 = 19 yd1 'Ta6te.1 MOUND CON70lNt LOADING RATES: ' -MWSUteA'.' Pere RaW � TorzGlro-+iwivad. mouiMabsorytitin rat - Contour. Loading .. S bOmpi OR 7.0, 1.3, 2.0, 2.4, 2.6 t12 61-120 rnpi 5.0 s12 > 120 mpi' >5.0' <5• TABLE IXa LOADING RATES FOR DETERMINING BOTTOM ABSORPTION AREA AND ABSORPTION RATIOS USING PERCOLATION TESTS Permlatlon Rate (MPI) Tte,tmen[ LevN C Tr<,tmeia level A, A-2, e, Arc,��Y Abend R,te ��tlO° 1ad�R'1 R�tlo Area pate (@NR') Abuts Absorption pffio �a1 1 1 O.t to 6 1.2 1 1.8 1 0.1 to 618na send end be fine Band 0.6 2 1 1.6 filo 16 0.78 1.6 1 1.8 16 to 30 0,8 p 0.78 2 31 to 45 0.6 Z.4 0.78 Z 4610 60 0.66 2.8 D.6 Z.6 6110 t20 6 0.9 6.3 >120 - 5. DISTRIBUTION MEDIA: IWISTERED TREATMENT PRODUCTS: CHAMBEW.ND EZFLOW A. Enter Dispersal Media: B. Enter the Component: Length: ft Width:ft Depth:ft C. Number of Components per Row = Bed Length divided by Component Length (Round up) ft - ft = components/row D. Actual Bed Length = Number of Components/row X Component Length: components X ft = ft E. Number of Rows = Bed Width divided by Component Width (Round up) ft + �� ft = rows Adjust width so this is an whole number. F. Total Number of Components = Number of Components per Row X Number of Rows X _ components 6. MOUND SIZING A. Calculate Minimum Clean Sand Lift: 3 feet minus Depth to Limiting Condition = Clean Sand Lift 3.0 ft - E= ft = 1.3 ft Design Sand Lift (optional): ft B. Calculate Upslope Height: Clean Sand Lift + media depth + cover (1 ft.) = Upslope Height 1.3 ft + F 1.0 ft + 1.0 ft = 3.3 ft C. Select Upslope Berm Multiplier (based on land slope): F 2.13 ✓ Land Slope % 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 9 10 11 12 Upslope Berm Ratio 3:1 3.00 2.)1 2.83 2.75 2.68 2.61 2.54 2.48 2.42 2.36 2.31 2.26 2.21 4:1 4.00 3.85 3.70 3.57 3.45 3.33 3.23 3.12 3.03 2.94 2 , 861 2.78 2.70 D. Calculate Upslope Berm Width: Multiplier X Upstope Mound Height = Upslope Berm Width 2.13 ft X 3.3 ft = 7.1 ft E. Calculate Drop in Elevation Under Bed: Bed Width X Land Slope - 100 = Drop (ft) 10.0 ft X 14.0 % - 100 = 1.40 ft F. Calculate Downslope Mound Height: Upslope Height + Drop in Elevation = Downslope Height 3.3 ft + 1.40 ft = 4.7 ft G. Select Downslope Berm Multiplier (based on land slope): F 5.24 7 ✓ Land Slope% 0 1 2 3 4 1 5 1 6 7 L 8 1 9 1 1011 12 Downslope 3:1 3.00 3.09 3.19 3.30 1 3.41 1 3.53 3.66 3.80 3.95 4.11 4.29 4.48 4.69 Berm Ratio 4:1 4.00 4.17 4.35 4.54 4.76 5.00 5.26 5.56 5.88 6.25 6.67 7.14 7.69 H. Calculate Downslope Berm Width: Multiplier X Downslope Height = Downslope Berm Width 5.24 x 4.7 ft = 24.8 ft I. Calculate Minimum Berm to Cover Absorption Area: Downslope Absorption Width + 4 feet 16.0 ft + ft = 20.0 ft J. Design Downslope Berm = greater of 4H and 41: 24.8 ft K. Select Endslope Berm Multiplier: 3.00 (usually 3.0 or 4.0) L. Calculate Endslope Berm X Downslope Mound Height = Endslope Berm Width 3.00 ft X 4.7 ft = 14.2 ft M. Calculate Mound Width: Upslope Berm Width + Bed Width + Downslope Berm Width 7.1 ft + 10.0 ft + 24.8 ft = 41.9 ft N. Calculate Mound Length: Endslope Berm Width + Bed Length + Endslope Berm Width 14.2 ft + 50.0 ft + 14.2 ft = 78.4 ft 1a z 7. MOUND DIMENSIONS ----------------------- Upslope (4.D) 7.1 ZE R Endslo a 4.L Dispersal Bed: (2.B x 2.C) o IEndslope 4.L a Y v j4.2 ru 10.0 x 50.0 141; 3 v v U 24 8 m ------------------------------ ------------------------ Downslope (4.J) ----Total TotalMound Length 4.N 78.4 4" inspection pipe 18" cover on top 24 8 U slo a berm (4.D) Downslo e berm 4.J 7.1 12" cover on sides (6" topsoil) Clean sand lift (4.A) 1.3 Limiting Condition Depth to Limiting (1.C) '--------------- Absorption Width (3.A) ------------- Note: F 26.0 For 0 to 1% slopes, Absorption Width is measured from the Bedequally in both directions. For slopes >1%, Absorption WWI? is measured downhill from the upslope edge of the Bed. Comments: a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 0 OSTP Mound Materials Worksheet UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 'h A. Calculate Bed (rock) Volume: Bed Length (2.Q X Bed Width 2.8) X Depth - Volumeft3 50.0 it X 10.0 ft X 1.0 500.0 ft' Divide ft' by 27 ft'lyd' to calculate cubic yards: 500.0 ft3 + 27 = 18.5 yd3 Add 20% for constructability: 18.5 yd3 X 1.2 = 22.2 yd3 B. Calculate Clean Sand Volume: Volume Under Rock bed: Average Sand Depth x Media Width x Media Len h =cubic fee[ 2.0 it X 10.0 ft % 50.0 ft = 1016.7 ft3 For a Mound on a slope from 0-1% Volume from Length - ((U lope Mound Height - 1) X Absorption Width Beyond Bed X Media Bed Length) ft -1) X X �ft Volume from Width = ((Upslope Height - 1) X Abs Width Beyond Bed%ia lied Width) A- SII t ft -1) X X ft 1) J Total Clean Sand Volume: Volume from Len th + Volume from Width + Volume Under Media ft3 . k3 . E ft3 �ft3 For a Mound on a sloe greater than I% Upslope Volume: ((Upslope Mound Height - f x 3 x Bed Length) • 2 = cubic feet it -1) X 3.0 ft X 50.0 )+2= 175.0 ft' Downslope Volume: ((Downslo Nei ht - 1 x Downslope Absorption Width x Media Length) • 2 = cubic feet (( 4.7 ft - 1) X ift % 1 50.0 )-2- 1493.3 ft' Endslope Volume: (Downslope Mound Hei ht - f) x 3 x Media Width =cubic feet ( 4.7 ft - 1) X 3.0 it X 10.0 ft = 112.0 ft' Total Clem Sand Volume: Upslope Volume . Downslope Volume . Endslo Volume . Volume Under Media 175.0 f[' + 1493.3 it 112.0 ft' . 1016.7 ft3 = 2797.0 ft' Divide ft' by 27 ft'/yd' to calculate cubic yards: 2797.0 ft' + 27 = 103.6 yd3 Add 20% for constructabRity: 103.6 yd' X 1.2 = 124.3 yd3 Total Berm Volume (approx): ((Avg. Mound Height - 0.5 ft topsoil) x Mound uLength) eet ( 4.0 0.5 )ft X 41.9 it X X 78.4 )-2- 5803.8 7ftl Total Mound Volume - Clean Sand volume -Rock Volume - cubic feet 5803.8 ft3 - 2797.0 W 500.0 it, 2506.8 ft' Divide ft' by 27 ft'/yd' to calculate cubic yards: 2506.8 it, + 27 = 92.8 yd3 Add 20% for corlstructability: 92.8 yd3 x 1.2 = 111.4 yd3 Calculate Topsoil Material Volume: Total Mound Width X Total Mound Length X.5 ft 41.9 it X 78.4 ft X 0.5 ft = 1692.6 ft3 Divide ft' by 27 ft'/yd3 to calculate cubic yards: 1642.6 ft3 + 27 60.8 yd3 Add 20% for constructability: 60.8 yd3 x 1.2 = 73.0 yd3 Minnesota Pollution Loncroi OSTP+Pressure Distribution DPcian Wnrkchaat UNIVERSITY U 1v111V 1V r -3U IH 1 ProiectID: 15-1178 v 03.19.151 1. Media Bed Width: 10 ft 2. Minimum Number of Laterals in system/zone = Rounded up number of [(Media Bed Width - 4) ; 3) + 1. ( 10 4 ) + 1 = laterals Does not apply to at -grades 3. Designer Selected Number of laterals: laterals Cannot be less than line 2 (accept in at -grades) - - 4. Select Perforation Spacing F7 3.0 7ft T 5. Select Perforation Diameter Size: 1 /4 in ----------------------- 6. Length of Laterals = Media Bed Length - 2 Feet. 50 - 2ft = 48 ft Perforation can not be closer then 1 foot from edge. 7 Determine the Number of Perforation Spaces. Divide the Length of Laterals by the Perforation Spacing and round down to the nearest whole number. Number of Perforation Spaces 48 ft �ft = 16 Spaces Number of Perforations per Lateral is equal to 1.0 plus the Number of Perforation Spaces. Check table 8. below to verify the number of perforations per lateral guarantees less than a 10% discharge variation. The value is double with a center manifold. Perforations Per Lateral = ==Spaces + 1 = 17 Perfs. Per Lateral 9• Total Number of Perforations equals the Number of Perforations per Lateral multiplied by the Number of Perforated Laterals. 17 Perf. Per Lat. X Number of Perf. Lat. = 51 Total Number of Perf. 10. Select Type of Manifold Connection (End or Center): 0 End ❑ Center 11. Select lateral Diameter (See Table) 7 I z -Do lin M )dnn Number of Perforations Per Lateral to Guarantee <10% Dscharge Variation V, Inch Perforations 7/32 Inch Perforations Perforation Spacing (Feet) Pipe Diameter (inches) Perforation Spacing (Feet) Pipe Diameter (Inches) 1 114 11: 2 3 1 I% I M 2 3 2 10 13 1 18 30 60 2 11 16 21 34 68 tri 8 12 16 28 54 2H 10 14 20 32 64 3 8 12 16 25 52 3 9 14 19 30 60 3/16 inch Perforations 1/8 Inch Perforations Perforation Spacing (Feet) Pipe Diameter (Inches) Perforation Spaang Pipe Diameter (Inches) 1 114 iH 2 31 1 tk 111 2 3 2 12 18 1 26 4687 2 21 33 44 74 149 2S1 12 17 24 40 80 tri 20 30 41 69 135 3 12 16 22 37 75 3 20 29 38 64 128 9• Total Number of Perforations equals the Number of Perforations per Lateral multiplied by the Number of Perforated Laterals. 17 Perf. Per Lat. X Number of Perf. Lat. = 51 Total Number of Perf. 10. Select Type of Manifold Connection (End or Center): 0 End ❑ Center 11. Select lateral Diameter (See Table) 7 I z -Do lin AIE OSTPPressure Distribution Minnesota PollutionUNIVERSITY Design WorksheetMIC ControlA Agency OF MINNESOTA 7� 12. Calculate the Square Feet per Perforation. Recommended value is 4-11 ft per perforation. Does not apply to At -Grades a. Bed Area = Bed Width (ft) X Bed Length (ft) 10 ft X 50 ft = 500 ft b. Square Foot per Perforation = Bed Area divided by the Total Number of Perforations. 500 ft' - 51 perforations o 9.8 ft2/perforations 13. Select Minimum Average Head: 1.0 it 14. Select Perforation Discharge (GPM) based on Table: 0.74 GPM per Perforation 15. Determine required Flow Rate by multiplying the Total Number of Perfs. by the Perforation Discharge. 51 Perfs X 0.74 GPM per Perforation = 38 GPM 16. Volume of Liquid Per Foot of Distribution Piping (Table ll) : 0.170 Gallons/ft 17. Volume of Distribution Piping = Table II _ [Number of Perforated Laterals X Length of Laterals X (Volume of Volume of Liquid in Liquid Per Foot of Distribution Piping] Pipe Pipe Liquid C� X 48 ft X 0.170 gal/ft = 24.5 Gallons Diameter Per Foot (inches) I (Gallons) 18. Minimum Delivered Volume = Volume of Distribution Piping X 4 24.5 gals X 4 = 97.9 Gallons [Comments/Special Design Considerations: cleanou , Manifold 1.25 0.078 1.5 0.110 20.170 31 0.380 pipe from pump OSTP Basic Pump Selection Design Minnesota Pollution Worksheet UNIVERSITY Conal n OF MINNESOTA ..-L 1. PUMP CAPACITY Project ID: 15-1178 Pumping to Gravity or Pressure Distribution: O Gravity OO Pressure Selection required 1. If pumping to gravity enter the gallon per minute of the pump: GPM (10 - 45 gpm) 2. If pumping to a pressurized distribution system: 38.0 GPM 3. Enter pump description: I Demand Dosing Soil Treatment Z. HEAD REQUIREMENTS 1.25 A. Elevation Difference 10 ft between pump and point of discllha--rge-- B. Distribution Head Loss: �ft C. Additional Head Loss: it (due to specie[ equipment. etc.) Distribution Head Loss Gravity Distribution - Oft Pressure Distribution based on Minimum Average Head Value on Pressure Distribution Worksheet: `Mlnimum:Avem 0t1l06C1 I Distribtstion: Head toss ift 5ft 2ft Eft Wt loft D. 1. Supply Pipe Diameter: 2.0 in 2. Supply Pipe Length: 25 ft E. Friction Loss in Plastic Pipe per 100ft from Table I: Friction Loss = 367 it per 100ft of pipe F. Determine Equivalent Pipe Length from pump discharge to soil dispersal area discharge point. Estimate by adding 25% to supply pipe length for fitting loss. Supply Pipe Length (D.2) X 1.25 - Equivalent Pipe Length a tliflew n . z able I.Frictfon Loss in Plastic Pipe per 100ft Flow Rate I Pipe Diameter (inches) 10 12 14 16 18 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 1 1.25 1.5 9.1 3.1 1.3 12.8 4.3 1.8 17.0 5.7 2.4 21.8 7.3 3.0 9.1 3.8 11.1 4.6 16.8 6.9 23.5 9.7 12.9 16.5 20.5 25 ft X 1.25 31.3 ft 85 I 95 G. Calculate Supply Friction Loss by multiplying Friction Loss Per fooft (Line E) by the Equivalent Pipe Length (Line F) and divide by 100. Supply Friction Lots - 3.67 ft per 100ft X 31.3 ft + 100 - 1.1 ft 2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.7 2.4 3.2 4.1 5.0 6.1 7.3 8.6 10.0 11.4 13.0 16.4 20.1 H. Total Head requirement is the sum of the Elevation Difference (Line A), the Distribution Head Loss (Line B), Additional Head Loss (Line C), and the Supply Friction Loss (Line G ) 10.0 ft 5.0 ft + E:=ft + 1.1 ft - 16.1 ft 3. PUMP SELECTION A Pump must be selected to deliver at least 38.0 GPM (Line 1 or Line 2) with at least16.1 feet of total head. "Mlnnewt�llutbn • Control Agency OSTP Pump Tank Design Worksheet •UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA L DETERMINE TANK CAPACITY AND DIMENSIONS Project ID: 15.1178 v 03.19.15 1. A. Design Flow (Design Sum. IA) ; 600 GPD B. Min. required pump tank capacity: 1000 Gal C.Recommended pump tank capacity: 1000 Gal D. Pump tank description: Demand to Pressure A. Rectangle area - Length (L) X Width (W) 8.2 it X 5.1 it = 41.5 it, B. Circle area = 3.14rt (3.14 X radius X radius) 3.14 X 2 it = it, C. Calculate Gallons Per Inch. Multiply the area from i.A or 1.B, by 7.5 to determine the gallons per foot the tank holds and divide by 12 to calculate the gallons Per inch. 41.5 ft' X 7.5 gal/ft' + 12 in/ft = 25.9 Gallons per inch D. Calculate Total Tank Volume Depth from bottom of Inlet pipe to tank bottom: 43.5 in Total Tank Volume = Depth from bottom of inlet pipe (Line 4.A) X Gallons/Inch (Line 2) 43.5 in X 25.9 Gallons Per Inch = 1128.3 Gallons VJdN Length Radiu 3. A. Tank Manufacturer: ]Bette Plaine Black it Tile I Note: Design calculations are based on this specific tank. Substituting a B. Tank Abdel: lConcrete - Rectangle different tank mode( will change the C. Capacity from manufacturer: pump float or timer settings. Contact 1128 Gallons designer if changes are necessary. D. Gallons per inch from manufacturer: 25.9 Gallons per inch E. Liquid depth of tank from manufacturer: 43.5 inches 4. Calculate Volume to Cover Pump (The inlet of the pump must be at least 4 -inches from the bottom of the pump tank 3 2 inches of water covering the pump is recommended) (Pump and black height + 2 Inches) X Gallons Per Inch (2C or 3E) (16 in + 2 inches) X 25.9 Gallons Per Inch 5. Minimum Delivered Volume - 4 X Volume of Distribution Piping: - Line 17 of the Pressure Distribution or Line 11 of Non -level 6. Calculate Maximum is mpout Volume (25% of Design Flow) Design Row: GPD X 0.25 7. Select 0 pumPout volume that meets both Min/mum and Maximum: B. Calculate Doses Per Day - Design Flow + Delivered Volume �9N + 150 gal = ODoses 9. Calculate Drainback: A. Diameter of Supply Pipe= inches B. Length of Supply Pipe = 25 feet C. Volume of Liquid Per Lineal Foot of Pipe = 0.170 Gallons/ft D. Droinback = Length of Supply Pipe X Volume of Liquid Per Lineal Foot of Pipe 2B it X 0.170 gal/ft 4,3 Gallons 10. TOWI Dosing Volume - Delivered Volume plus Drafnback fso gal + 4.3 gal = 54 Gallons 11. Minimum Alarm Volume = Depth of alarm (2 or 3 inches) X gallons per inch of tank �in X 25.9 gal/in = 77.8 Gallons 467 Gallons 98 Gallons (minimum dose) 150 Gallon (maximum dose) 150 Gallons Volume of Liquid in Pipe Pipe Diameter (inches) Liquid Per Foot (Gallons) 1 0.045 1.25 0.078 1.5 0.110 2 0.170 3 0.380 4 0.661 'Minnesota Pollution Control Agency OSTP Pump Tank Design Worksheet �J UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TIMER or DEMAND FLOAT SETTINGS Select Timer or Demand Dosing: 0 Timer OO conara case A. Timer Settings 12. Required Flaw Rate: A. From Design (Line 12 of Pressure Distribution or Line 10 of Non -Lever): GPM B. Or calculated: GPM = Change in Depth (in) x Gallons Per Inch /Time Interval in Minutes 'Note: This value must C�be in X Bal/in : � adjusse ter min = �F GPM installation n b basedd on 13. Flow Rate from Line 12.A or 12.B above. PUMP calibration. GPM 14. Calculate TIMER ON setting: Total Dosing Volume/GPM gal' Pill Minutes ON 15. Calculate TIMER OFF setting: Minutes Per Day (1440)/Doses Per Day - Minutes On 1440 min_doses/day - min = Minutes OFF 16. Pump Off Float - Measuring from bottom of tank: Distance to to set Pump Off Floot-Gallons to Cover Pump / Gallons Per Inch: gal + C� gal/in = Inches 17. Alarm Float - Measuring from. bottom of tank: Distance to set Alarm Float - Tank Depthf4A) X 90% of Tank Depth in X 0.90 = E::=in B. DEMAND DOSE FLOAT SETTINGS 18. Calculate Floot Separation Distance using Dosing Volume. Total Dosing Volume /Gallons Per Inch 154 gal + 25.9 gal/in - 5.9 Inches 19. Measuring from bottom of tank: A. Distance to set Pump Off Float = Pump + black height+ 2 inches 16 in + C 3� in = 19 Inches B. Distance to set Pump On Float=Distance to Set pump -off Float + Float Separation Distance 19 in + 5.9 in = 25 Inches C. Distance to set Alarm Floot = Distance to set Pump -On Float + Alarm Depth (2-3 Inches) 25 in + 3.0 in = 2B Inches FLOATSETTINGS DEMAND DOSING TIMED DOSING Inches far Dose: 5.9 in AlarmDepth R9 in Alarm Depth in Pump On 24.9 in 77.8125 Gal Pump Off 19.0 in 154 Gal Pump Off in 493 Gal CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2015-13 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 16, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The Purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for a variance to the wetland setback to relocate a septic system on property zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) and located at 1190 Lyman Boulevard. Applicant/ Owner: Duane Skluzack. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at wwwci.chanhassen. mn.us/2015-15 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Drew Ingvatson, Planning Intern Email: dingvalson@ ci.chanhassen.ron.us Phone: 952-227-1132 (Published in the Chanhassen Pillager on Thursday, June 4, 2015: No 41 39) Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz By: 4n ct�/ Laurie A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on this L f day ofVA i ,.-R� , 2015 JYMME JEANNETTE BARK NO'ARYPt;BJC-M:NNES'J"A ,:,�w � + coCwMS810N f](PflES 01tr11!6 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter ............................................... $12.59 per column inch SCANNEC 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2015-15 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June 16, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for a variance to the wetland setback to relocate a septic system on property zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) and located at 1190 Lyman Boulevard. Applicant/Owner: Duane Skluzack. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-15 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Drew Ingvalson, Planning Intern Email: dingvalsonAci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1132 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on June 4, 2015) SCANNED 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Drew Ingvalson, Planner FROM: Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator DATE: June 3, 2015 r� u RE: Wetland Setback Variance for SSTS at 1190 Lyman Blvd Planning Case: 2015-15 Subsurface Sewage Treatment setbacks from wetlands are not include in MN Rules Chapter 7080 but rather are unique to Chanhassen City Code. As the wetland boundary is only assumed based upon general observations of soils and topography, it is indeterminate if the proposed location is actually closer to the wetland than the other location shown on the drawing. The applicant is making an attempt to be sensitive to other natural resources in the siting of the septic system. Provided that the design and construction of the septic system is compliant with MN Rules Chapter 7080 and accepted industry practices I see no compelling reason to deny the variance request. 3CANNEC'' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL CITY OF CHANHASSEN Agency Review Request Date: May 21, 2015 Agency Review Response Deadline: June 4, 2015 Date Application Filed: May 20, 2015 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Drew Ingvalson 952-227-1132 dingvalson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Planning Intern Shorewood ❑ Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60 -Day Review Period Deadline: June 16, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. July 13, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. July 19, 2015 Application: Request for wetland setback Variance to relocate septic system on property zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) and located at 1190 Lyman Boulevard. ApplicanUOwner: Duane Skluzacek Planning Case: 2015-15 Web Page: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-15 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: ■ ON OR p/ E Z6 ►/ Attorney ' Building Official rrr+++ Engineer ( , Fire Marshal Forester Park Director Watar Raero ,rrne Carver Countv Agencies: Community Development �\ Engineer JJJ Environmental Services Historical Society Parks Soil & Water Conservation District State Agencies: ❑ Board of Water & Soil Resources ❑ Health ❑ Historical Society ❑ Natural Resources -Forestry ❑ Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control ❑ Transportation Federal Agencies: ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ US Fish & Wildlife Watershed Districts: ❑ Carver County WMO ❑ Lower MN River ❑ Minnehaha Creek ® Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Utilities: ❑ Cable TV — Mediacom ❑ Electric — Minnesota Valley ❑ Electric — Xcel Energy ❑ Magellan Pipeline ❑ Natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy ❑ Phone — CenturyLink Adjacent Cities: ❑ Chaska ❑ Eden Prairie ❑ Jackson Township ❑ Minnetonka ❑ Shorewood ❑ Victoria Adiacent Counties: ❑ Hennepin ❑ Scott School Districts: ❑ Eastern Carver County 112 ❑ Minnetonka 276 Other Agencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority ❑ MN Landscape Arboretum ❑ SouthWest Transit ❑ TC&W Railroad SCANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CHAN�SSEN Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline Agency Review Request Date: Agency Review Response Deadline: Date Application Filed: May 21, 2015 June 4, 2015 May 20, 2015 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Drew Ingvalson 952-227-1132 dingvalson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Planning Intern Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60-Day Review Period Deadline: Z C•6 June 16, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. July 13, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. July 19, 2015 Application: Request for wetland setback Variance to relocate septic system on property zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) and located at 1190 Lyman Boulevard. Applicant/Owner: Duane Skluzacek Planning Case: 2015-15 1 Web Page: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2015-15 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: Federal Agencies: Adjacent Cities: ❑ Attorney ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Chaska ® Building Official ❑ US Fish & Wildlife ❑ Eden Prairie ® Engineer ❑ Jackson Township ® Fire Marshal Watershed Districts: ❑ Minnetonka ® Forester El Shorewood E] Carver County W MO El Victoria ® Park Director ® Water Resources F] Lower MN River ❑ Minnehaha Creek Adjacent Counties: Carver County Agencies: ® Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek ❑ Hennepin ❑ Community Development Utilities: ❑ Scott ❑ Engineer ® Environmental Services El Cable TV — Medi School Districts: El Electric Minnesootata Valley — ❑ Historical Society [_1 Eastern Carver County 112 El Parks [:1 Electric — Xcel Energy El Soil &Water Conservation District El Magellan Pipeline El Minnetonka 276 ❑ Natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy State Agencies: ❑ Phone — CenturyLink Other Agencies: El Hennepin County Regional Railroad ❑ Board Water &Soil Resources of Authority ❑ Health Landscape Arboretum ❑ Historical Society ❑ ❑ So Transit ❑ Natural Resources-Forestry TC&W Railrost ad ❑ TC&W Railroad ❑ Natural Resources-Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control ❑ Transportation SCANNEI^ w�AL Mn CITY OF CHANHASSEN P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 05/21/2015 3:40 PM Receipt No. 00284568 CLERK: AshleyM 0 0 PAYEE: Linda Kerber Duane Skluzacek 1190 Lyman Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 - Planning Case 2015-15 ------------------------------------------------------- Variance 200.00 Recording Fees 50.00 GIS List 60.00 Total Cash Check 1345 Change 310.00 0.00 310.00 0.00 SCANNED 0 1190 LYMAN BOULEVARD VARIANCE - PLANNING CASE 2015-15 $0.00 Notification Sign -WAIVED $200.00 Variance $60.00 Property Owners List $50.00 Escrow for recording variance documents $310.00 TOTAL $310.00 Check 1345 from Linda Kerber $0.00 BALANCE OWED 0 SCANNED Property Card Parcel ID Number 3530090 Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name DUANE R SKLUZACEK LINDA MURAKAMI Address 1190 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9166 Property Address Address 1190 LYMAN BLVD City CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 Building Information Estimated Market Value Building Style 2 STORY Above rade 1612 Finished S Ft Last Sale Bedrooms 4 Year Built 1984 Garage Y Date of Sale Bathrooms 1.5 $191,700.00 $195,200.00 Miscellaneous Information Total $325,700.00 AgPreserve N School District 0112 Watershed District WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF Homestead Y Green Acres N Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2014 Values (Payable 2015) 2015 Values (Payable 2016) Last Sale Land $134,000.00 $137,800.00 Date of Sale Building $191,700.00 $195,200.00 Sale Value Total $325,700.00 $333,000.00 The data provided herewith is for reference purposes only. This data is rot suitable for legal engineering, surveying or other similar purposes. Carver County aces not guarantee the accuracy of the ofornatlon contained herein, This data is formal on an'as is basis and Carver County makes no representations or warrantres, either expressed or implied for the merchantability or fitness of the information provided for any purpose. This disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03 and the user of the data provided herein acknowledges that Carver County shall not be liable for any damagesand by wing this data o any way expressly waives all claims. and agrees to defendindemnify. and hold harmless Carver County. its officials officers. agentsemployeasetcfrom any antl all claims brought by anyone who uses the information pindi for herein, its emplayees or agents. or CARVER mind parties whldr arms but of users access. By acceptance of this data the user agrees not to traremil this data or provide access to It or any part of it to another party unless the user includes COUNTY with the data a copy of Ihls disclaimer Thursday, May 21, 2015 SCANNEC Carver County. MN