The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-17_2016-17 VAR OWNER: TRAVIS SENEFELDER0 0 The contents of this file have been scanned. Do not add anything to it unless it has been scanned. r 0 Document No. T199777 OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA Certified Recorded on -July 21. 2016 12:39 PM Cert # 37730 11111111111 11111111 199777 CITY OF CIHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2016-17 Fee: $46.00 Luke C Kranz Registrar of Titles 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves the variance request to permit a 25 -foot front yard setback with up to 18 inches additional encroachment for an eave. 2. Pro . The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as Lots 2969-2973 and 3018-3022, Carver Beach, Carver County, Minnesota. 3. Conditions. The variance approval is subject to the following conditions: a. A Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District permit is required. b. The wetland boundary must be confirmed and a notice of decision confirming the wetland boundary must be obtained based upon this confirmation. c. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit prior to construction of a home. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse. Dated: June 21, 2016 SCANNSO I., 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: At-4�f� (SEAL) nnyDLa enburger, Mayor AND: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA (ss COUNTY OF CARVER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ISday of ---► �+ t 2016 by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of thanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 2 NOTAR P`UB�IC IRKIM T. MEUWISSEN NOfe�Y Publ c -Minnesota z)sZS Y Co.'n/Nkhn E.P re' Jin 31, pop $ CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION VARIANCE Application of Castle Gate Construction and Travis Senefelder for an eight foot front yard setback variance to construct a single-family home on property zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF) - Planning Case 2016-17. On June 21, 2016, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lots 2969-2973 and 3018-3022, Carver Beach, Carver County, Minnesota 4. Variance Findings - Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The granting of the variance will permit the development of a single-family home on the site which is consistent with the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The practical difficulty is that the wetland in the rear yard forces the house to move closer to the street. The use of the property for a single-family home is reasonable. SCANNEC 0 c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: While the applicant has stated that moving he house closer to the road will save money on file, the need for the variance is to permit an appropriate sized home on the site. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The plight of the landowner is due to the location of a large wetland complex in the rear yard which forces development of the property closer to the road. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The variance will not alter the character of the area. Carver Beach has many homes that are built closer to the road. Just north of the property and across Carber Beach Road, there is a structure that appears to be right at the property line. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2016-17, dated June 27, 201y, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. The Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, approves a 25 front yard setback with up to 18 inches additional encroachment for an eve subject to the conditions in this staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 21' day of June, 2016. CITY OF CHANHASSEN I -W Chairman g:\plan\2016 planning cases\2016-17 691 carver beach road - variance\5ndings of fac[.docx June 28, 2016 11111fp O� Mr. Dan Kurth [��'Iu1[1�'(r Castle Gate Construction CgANgASSEN 742 Tilia Lane 7700 Markel Boulevard Victoria, MN 55386 PBoz Re: PlanningCase #2016-17 Chanhassen, MNN 55317 Front Yard Variance Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 This letter is to confirm that on June 21, 2016, the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Fax: 952.2271110 Adjustments approved the variance request to permit a 25 -foot front yard setback Fax: 952.227.1110 with up to 18 inches additional encroachment for an eave subject to the following Building inspections conditions: Phone: 952.227.1180 applied for prior to any construction on the site. The variance is valid for one year Y Fax: 952.227.1190 1. A Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District permit is required. Engineering Phone: 952.2271160 2. The wetland boundary must be confirmed and a notice of decision confirming g Fax: 952.227.1170 the wetland boundary must be obtained based upon this confirmation. Finance 3. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit prior to Phone: 952.227.1140 Construction of a home. Fax: 952.227.1110 Park The City will record the variance with Carver County. A building permit must be :Recreation Phone: 952.2271120 applied for prior to any construction on the site. The variance is valid for one year Y Fax: 952.2271110 from the approval date. A building permit must be applied for prior to June 20, 2017 through the City's Building Department or the variance becomes void. You may Recreation Center submit plans for building permit review, but the permit cannot be issued until the 2310 Coulter Boulevard conditions of the variance approval have been addressed. If you have any questions Phone: 952.227.1400 or need additional information, please contact me at (952) 227-1131 or by email at Fax: 952.2271404 bbgenerous(mci.chanhassen.mn.us. Planning 8 Natural Resources S e Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Robert Generous, AICP Public Works Senior Planner 7901 Park Place Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.2271310 c: Travis Senefelder ec: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Senior Center Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Phone: 952.227.1125 Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator Fax:952.2271110 Jerry Mohn, Building Official Steve Lenz, Engineering Technician III Website vnvw.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Stepahnie Smith, Project Engineer Mackenzie Walters, Assistant Planner sr.ANNEF_ Chanhassen is a Community for Life . Providing torToday and Planning for Tomorrow CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 201617 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, June, 21 at 7:OOp.m. in the CouncilChambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for a front yard setback variance on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 691 Carver Beach Road. Applicant: Castle Gate Construction. Owner: Travis Senefelder. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at wwwci.chanhassen. mn.us/2016-17 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, ACIS Email: bgenerous@ ci.chanhaeccn.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Published to the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, June 9, 2016: No. 4295) 0 0 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. i (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No.� was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghijkttnnopgrstuvwayz Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of 2016 N ublic RATE INFORMATION LaurieA. Hartmann JY�"WE JEANNE17E BARK NTAW RJUC - M:NNE$OTA W COMMSS fi t�(a;RESo?find 6 Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................. $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $12.59 per column inch Chanhassen Planning Co,l ission — June 21, 2016 • Aller: Having a motion and a second, any further discussions? Yusuf moved, Madsen onded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council app ve the Interim Use Permit to permit grading in excess of 1,000 cubic yards to include par g lot alterations, storm water improvements and the grading of a hockey rink, plans prepa d by Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. dated May 29, 2016 and subject to the following co 'tions and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendations: 2. 3. 9 Gi 3 The grading plan, hydrologic map and storm water model shall be revised to be consistent with each other. \ The plan must obtain appropriate pern4its from the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District_ The plan set must be revised to show the the north wetland. A buffer must be established and maintained installed. The plan shall be revised to show the first floor proposed slope from the parking lot to the wetland and monuments must be of the proposed warming house. Emergency Overflow locations and elevations shall be shown on the grading plan. Autumn Blaze maples shall not be included in the planting plan. An alternate species, approved by the City, shall be provided. Signed, professional design and building permit required for any retaining walls exceeding 48 inches in height. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Aller: This matter again will be before the City Council on July 11, 2016. Moving onto item 2 on tonight's calendar. PUBLIC HEARING: 691 CARVER BEACH ROAD — REOUEST FOR A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARLANCE ON PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RSF) AND LOCATED AT 691 CARVER BEACH ROAD. APPLICANT: CASTLE GATE CONSTRUCTION. OWNER: TRAVIS SENEFELDER. SCANNED Chanhassen Planning Coossion — June 21, 2016 • Generous: Mr. Chair and before I start I'd like to point out that the City makes the City go through the same process of development review that we make an individual coming into the process so they weren't too happy about that either. Planning Case 2016-17 is a variance request for a property, 691 Carver Beach Road. The public hearing is scheduled for tonight. Should this item be appealed or be a non -unanimous decision then it will go to City Council on July I l x. Applicant is Castle Gate Construction. The owner is Travis Senefelder. The request is for an 8 foot front yard setback variance to permit a 22 foot front yard setback. Again this is located in Carver Beach. It was subdivided in the 1920's so they have the standard lots are 20 by 100 foot in width and so there's multiple lots that make up this lot. This specific property is approximately 20,000 square feet in area. It's zoned single family residential. Minimum lot sizes are 15,000 square feet so it exceeds the minimum lot area. It also has 100 feet of frontage on Carver Beach Road and it has approximately 200 feet of depth. Our minimum standards are 90 feet of frontage and 125 feet of depth so it exceeds the minimum requirements. The problem with this lot is there's a wetland in the rear yard of it and it takes up probably almost, over a third of the land area there. This wetland requires a setback, I'll step back. This property is also guided residential low density on the City's Comprehensive Plan. Under that density 1.2 to 4 units per acre are anticipated for development. Again this is a lot of, or lots of record. It's an appropriate building site. Wetland setback is 55 feet on the back. Front yard setback is 30 feet. As I said the applicant is requesting an 8 foot front yard setback variance. In essence a 22 foot front yard setback. Again here's a survey of the property that was submitted by the applicant. It was actually showing a 26 foot setback but it did not meet the lakeshore setback, or the wetland setback on the rear. What we are recommending is that an alternative to the 22 foot be a 25 foot setback would be more appropriate which would be a 5 foot variance on the front. As part of our reasoning for that we're looking at the ability to have a pick up truck parked in their driveway on their property outside of the right-of-way so that generally gives sufficient. 22 feet for the truck and then you have 3 feet to the garage door. We believe this is a reasonable request. Again the property's zoned single family residential. Permitted uses in the RSF district are single family homes. What they're proposing. Again the lot exceeds the minimum requirements. It's a lot of record so we really need to look at providing them with a reasonable use. The unique circumstances to this property is that there's a wetland in the rear yard that requires a 55 foot setback. And again that wetland takes up over a third of that rear yard so it's, they've lost a lot of area that they could do it. Our preference is always to preserve the natural features on there. If you look in the neighborhood Carver Beach is sort of unique. It was platted a long time ago. Houses were, one house across the street was built in 1913. That house is only 20 feet from the road. If you go 2 houses north of this site there's a house that was built and it looks like it's approximately a 5 foot setback from the structure to the property line. Oh I should point out that I handed out before this meeting 2 letters. One from James Henderson and the other one from Janelle Schrof. They are neighbors to this property to the east. They are both opposed to the granting of the variance request. Aller: And just for the record we have received those 2 letters. One dated 6-13-2016 and one dated 6-19-2016. I've had the opportunity to review them. They'll be part of the package should this matter need to go to the City Council. 3 Chanhassen Planning Cassion — June 21, 2016 • Generous: Thank you. Again Carver Beach is a very unique area. While I did the search for variances I could not find any within 500 feet but just by going out and looking at the property there are numerous properties that don't meet the 30 foot front yard setback. Again we believe this is reasonable request. Staff is recommending approval of a 5 foot front yard setback variance so 25 foot front yard setback requirement to permit the building, construction of a two story walkout style home on this property. And adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision. We would also like to add one more condition. As a provision of the variance approval the contractor builder come up with a construction parking plan. These are very narrow streets up there and we want to make sure that they remain open for traffic and emergency vehicles so they're going to have to provide us with a plan on how they're going to accommodate their construction parking. With that I'd be happy to answer any questions. Aller: Anything based on the presentation by the City at this point in time on the project. Commissioner Weick. Weick: Thank you Chairman Aller. Question on the survey itself. What is the, or is there a side yard setback? Generous: It would be 10 feet. Weick: So on these plans it's only listed being 7 setback it looks like. Generous: Right. Weick: So would we need a variance on that as well? Generous: No because we would require them to meet the 10 foot side yard. They can shift it to the north. Weick: Okay so this wouldn't be considered a final plan. Generous: No. It's a schematic to show their proposal. It has a house plan in there that based on that survey, it really showed us that you know they're almost at the wetland setback on the rear. They're 54.95 feet based on this plan. They need to be 55 feet. We gave them the benefit of the doubt and pushed it forward another additional foot or allowed them, are recommending that they be able to go to within 25 feet of the street front. Weick: Okay, thanks. That's the only question. Aller: Any additional questions at this point in time? Would the applicant like to come forward and state your name and address for the record sir and tell us about your project. Chanhassen Planning Colssion — June 21, 2016 • Dan Kurth: Dan Kurth. Address 742 Tilia Lane, Victoria. Aller: Welcome. Dan Kurth: Thank you. Aller: Tell us about what you want to do with the property. Dan Kurth: Well I know that the board looks like have kind of recommended to approve a 25. I think in the circumstance of that neighborhood you know I don't think 22 is unnecessary. I mean 22, that extra 3 feet isn't going to help because that wetland is very hard to design a house that's 29 feet deep or 30 feet deep. In that area too if you notice some of the new construction is, the lot prices are pretty high to build a very small house okay. The other thing is too like as he said there's precedence numerous houses in that area with setbacks much less than mine. And also another thing taking effect that between the street and the lot line there's another 10 foot of boulevard so actually the house will be 32 feet from the street or actually might be slightly more. If he is worried about the parking you know, you know a truck is going to be 18-20 feet. Oversized truck maybe longer. You know if I could you know you have a 24 foot width of a driveway and the lot line so you can see how it angles before the lot line and then there's another 10 feet to the street. How about if they allow me to go that 22 feet and then angle driveway from that point into the boulevard as an angle? Then you've got the full 22 feet or more you know so parking wouldn't be really an issue. It's just that angle would cause that to, as get into the third car garage right. I really think if you look at the precedence of that neighborhood there is numerous houses, like he said 5 foot. You know 15, 18 foot that are much less of a setback than mine and if, I don't know if any of you have seen that lot, not only does it drop off but if you look at the side yard it will not hinder their view of oncoming traffic at all because those lots are very wide. It isn't going to really any, any take away any aesthetics of neighbors of the house but I think having that extra 8 feet instead of the 5 feet really gives me a chance to build a little bigger house that's more suited for that neighborhood which the price values are kind of high for land there. And I don't think it's going to really hurt any aesthetics of that neighborhood and I think you'll, and the house will be designed to blend in with the neighborhood. Aller: Great. Any questions of the applicant at this point? Thank you very much sir. Dan Kurth: Alright. Aller: Okay as with these matters we'll open the public hearing. This is an opportunity for any individual that's in the audience to come forward and speak either for or against this item. Ask any questions you'd like to have me get answered to the best of our ability. Seeing no one come up, do we have a gentleman come forward? Please come to the podium. State your name and address for the record sir and let us know what your thoughts are. Chanhassen Planning Co•ssion — June 21, 2016 • Jeff Kleiner: It's Jeff Kleiner, 655 Carver Beach Road, Chanhassen. I used to own this property that Dan had. ".1rin dl� _I,I- Jeff Kleiner: Granted it is you know expensive lots out there. There is a huge wetland. It's going to be filled. Everything's going to be clear cut in there to get the house in and a lot of the driveways that are right next door to it are totally steep down and people have problems with their getting in and out in the winter. I know it's probably going to pass with the setbacks and that. I don't know where your boulevard is because they don't have that. Dan Kurth: No but there's from where the lot line is to the street down there is 10 foot further. Jeff Kleiner: Oh, in the street. Aller: Why don't you go ahead and address us that's okay and we'll try to get any questions answered just so we don't have problems. Jeff Kleiner: 'Then I wanted to know if this is a spec home or not. Aller: Okay. We'll get that answered. Jeff Kleiner: Okay, thanks. Aller: Awesome. So at this point in time do we know whether the home is, it's considered spec or is it? Dan Kurth: No it will be a spec house. Actually we... Aller: You can come on forward. Dan Kurth: We have had some interest on that lot but because of the condition of the wetland and narrowability it's also a little harder to build in that price range alright so that setback I think would give us the opportunity I think to have a broader appeal to potential buyers. Aller: And just to let you know that we don't look at the actual economic value of a piece of property for purposes of this or whether or not someone's going to make money or not make money. It's really regarding the land. The changes required by the land for the reasonable use so if you could comment on those things that would be helpful. Dan Kurth: Right you know as a builder I think too you've got an empty lot there that's very difficult to build on. I think it's there. It's approved for a buildable lot but because the wetland and the way that the topography of that land it makes it very difficult. I can you know the Chanhassen Planning Corvission — June 21, 2016 • problem is that I think you're going to have very unlikely somebody buying that lot to build a house that gives you a little tax base there because it's a very difficult lot. I think this is a reasonable thing. I really don't think it's going to hurt. You know what he is, Jeff is talking about the neighbors their actually driveways are like this. They probably shouldn't have done that you know. Our's is going to be more towards with elevations and that and the grade, the way we're going to be grading it will not be going into their lot at all. I mean into their driveways. We're going to have a channel. There's enough room on the sides so that shouldn't cause any further hardship for them. They already have a bad design. Aller: You're not requesting a variance regarding the slope of the driveway or any of those conditions that will be on your based upon the requirements that are typically had in construction. Dan Kurth: Yeah, right. Yeah have the 2 percent slope okay. Aller: Okay. Dan Kurth: You know and what I'm asking too in this variance request is that I think that 22 feet, I do understand that but if we could angle that to the street from that 22 feet, I think that eliminates any of that worry about that you know. Aller: Thank you. Any other individual wishing to come forward to speak either for or against the item can do so at this time. Seeing no one. Okay new hearing. Have to state your name and address again. Ken Vermeer: Ken Vermeer, 730 Preakness Lane, Chanhassen, Minnesota. We live directly opposite of that property and slightly I guess towards Lotus Lake so I don't think we're going to have any issues with the view or anything like that particularly during the summer when it's all covered and everything else. But we took a drive down Carver Beach Road and took a look at that property and it has got a major, major drop from the road into the lot itself and I'm just curious how much fill is going to be put into that thing and is that going to cause any kind of damage to the ecosystem. The wetlands down below because that is a natural area that frankly we want to see preserved. Aller: Sure. Ken Vermeer: Thank you. Aller: Okay. Well let's ask Alyson. Do we have a position on that at this point in time? Has there been any indication that there'll be fill in the area? Fauske: Thank you Chairman Aller. Just taking a look at their proposed survey, and I don't know how much this has changed. Perhaps if some of this is incorrect the applicant could 10 Chanhassen Planning Coviission — June 21, 2016 • correct me. The survey that's included in the packet indicates a first floor elevation or front garage elevation of a 944. Based on the contours that's shown on the existing, the plan there, they're at the garage floor at a 938 but then they're doing a 10 foot basement so they're working, they've chosen a home style to work with the grade elevation drop on the property and actually at the walkout elevation it looks like they would actually have a little bit of fill at the bottom there and I don't know if the applicant has run any numbers as far as if this is balance. The plan submitted does not show the proposed grades so perhaps if the applicant has some more information to provide to the Planning Commission as far as what they plan to do. If they have excess or need to import material to the site. Aller: Great, thank you. Dan Kurth: If I can add some further light on it. Aller: Come on up. We want to have a discussion. Dan Kurth: I think... understand you know we do have to clear, you see those trees that where it is, no matter what. What kind of house you're going to do those trees have to be taken out but if you notice the grade towards the back of that, none of those trees would, you know a couple of those in the back will have to be taken out but you have to also take in fact wetland is actually 55 feet away so we'll be putting a silt fence and probably also a erosion log on top of that okay because of the steepness of the grade. There will be fill and compaction and there has to be soil tests. We've already done a test on one of the comers. We've got some bad soils so we'll have to put in some compact which will be a soil report on that but the back, we are not trying to create a big usable yard so majority of that area where the grade is we're going to try to keep that as natural as possible so we're not creating you know 40 feet of back yard. It's basically is going to be minimal. Probably 10 to 12 feet where that deck is and even if that. Some of that area we'll keep it wild so we'll have to do a little bit of probably boulder wall landscaping but from that landscaping down, maybe 15 feet away from that house or less because I think we have to keep it within 35 feet so we will not even get close to the 35 foot from the wetland okay which is, we're trying to protect that. Aller: Right. Dan Kurth: The way the natural grade is there is during construction with a silt fence and erosion logs in front of that is going to prevent probably a majority if not all of the sediment from even reaching anything. Not only is there 35 feet separation, we're going to even get any disturbance. That's a lot of vegetation that's going to capture that but I don't think any of that is going to get through the sediment. Yes we are going to lose some of the trees in that but what we're trying to do is we're trying to preserve the overall effect of the land. We just have to build it up to build a house. We just can't build that low without a requirements that you guys have okay. 11 Chanhassen Planning Cortission — June 21, 2016 • Aller: Great, thank you. Okay. Any other individuals wishing to come forward? Seeing no one come forward I'll close the public hearing. Open it up for commissioner discussion. Based on the comments, thoughts? Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Yeah it just looks like there's, with that depth to the wetland there seems to be no reason to grant a variance whatsoever because you could push the house back and be at the required depth from the front yard and reduce the slope from the road to the garage. There's a 4 foot slope it looks like from the survey and then pushing the home to the north a bit creates a better, well as Bob already pointed out it doesn't meet the code on the south side anyhow so I guess I'm not so sure that there's really a need for a variance at all. Aller: Commissioner Weick. Weick: Sort of piggy backing off of that. I mean it does look like the house to the south, although it's been noted that depth of the house is an issue, that house is a house and you know it appears, I tried to, I mean there's not, unfortunately there's no measurements on that house. Tietz: Right. Weick: But you know I tried to draw a line across because the back of the houses are the same and the front of the house and it would actually be a little bit, even without a variance the new house would be a little bit deeper than that house that's existing to me so I guess along the same lines. Tietz: Well and the homes that are closer to the road if they were built in 1905 there's, you know new construction we have to consider as opposed to homes that have been there for 50 or 80 years. Weick: Right. Tietz: Those are not, they may not be, well they may not be typical but they're also historic. Weick: And which came first the house or the road? Tietz: In the presence yeah. Weick: Right? Tietz: Yeah. Aller: Well this isn't the first Carver Beach property that's been before us for a variance. I don't think that there's many if any, I'd have to look, that the properties aren't unique in some form or fashion in that area based on the way it was platted back in the 1920's and based on our zoning 12 Chanhassen Planning Coa-ssion — June 21, 2016 • coming in that much after it and again we're not looking at the economics. Whether or not someone, the price of the lot or the price that someone wants to get out of the property. We're looking at reasonable use. From the presentation it sounded like there was a lot of thought put into what was reasonable and different opportunities. I disagree with the fact that we want to tum driveways sideways and angle them and allow for as much as the 22 foot or an 8 foot setback but I am inclined to agree with the City that giving them a little bit of leeway which gives the eave space based upon the nature of the properties that are already there and are non- conforming that never had to come and ask for a variance. And knowing that the property's going to have to go through the process to get the building permit and to get all the requirements that we require as a City on the builder, at that point in time I think we can take care of any of the other problems. I like the fact that we're looking to preserve that wetland in the back. I think that's paramount especially in that area, Carver Beach and the Lotus Lake area and so I would think that it's reasonable to request this use and the 5 foot setback. Any other comments before we vote? Tietz: Bob have there been other variances requested for new construction in this area recently? For similar situations. Generous: Yes. Tietz: Okay. For new construction. Generous: (Yes). And the house immediately to the east of it was built in 2007. While there's no variance involved and we don't have the as built survey, from the aerial it looks like they're 25 feet from the Carver Beach Road. Tietz: From the road. Aller: Which is closer. Generous: From the right-of-way I should say. Tietz: Right-of-way okay. Aller: Any other comments? Questions of staff before I'll entertain a motion one way or the other. Or something inbetween. And I do agree with the additional condition. As we all know we can put on reasonable conditions because we have the leeway when someone's asking for a variance and to modify our zoning conditions that we put reasonable conditions on it and that parking plan, if there is a motion should I believe be attached to that. Thoughts? Motions. Madsen: I like the fact that the back yard is going to be kept as natural as possible and they're not going to, there's no plan to tear out the natural features of it and that by keeping the house within the variance rules and I believe the deck is also within those variance rules, you're 13 Chanhassen Planning CoAssion — June 21, 2016 • preserving the pond and the natural areas and that what you have proposed, although asking for the variance really keeps in with the character of the whole neighborhood so I guess I would agree with that. Tietz: Yeah Bob, can we also look at a profile and how the driveway's going to drain because it's not insignificant from the road to the proposed garage floor elevation and if that's all going to drain to the south and around on that side of the house down I think it's important to look at drainage so that if this is a spec house we're not going to have a garage full of water. Generous: Mr. Chairman as part of the building permit review that is something that we specifically look at. They may have no more than a 10 percent slope on that. There has to be positive drainage away from the home and we look at what it's impact will be on neighboring properties. And at that time we also require the erosion control stuff. Maybe even preservation fencing be put up because the wetland has a buffer area and then you have a setback area and so we may have 2 levels of protection back there. But that's all the way down at the bottom of the hill. That's 20 feet below grade at the front. Tietz: Yeah it's a pretty severe site. Aller: And that's why when I'm looking at this I'm looking at is this a reasonable request for the use of the property and trying to balance the owners opportunity to build and use his property the best he can and in light of our desire to keep and maintain our wetlands and our natural properties in the state that they're in and those requirements that we put on through the building process even though we would allow for setback at that point in time would be addressed as well as any water permits that are necessary for purposes of drainage. So because it's a unique property because and of course it's of no fault of this individual who didn't create the situation. That wetland and the other factors that we look at I'm keying in on the reasonable use of the property and I think this is a reasonable request. Any other comments? Would anyone like to make a motion to grant, deny, table. Yusuf: Well before anyone makes a motion I just want to make sure. Aller: Further comments and concerns, sure. Yusuf: Yeah before anyone makes a motion. I just want to make sure that your concerns are fully addressed since you were. Tietz: Well I think you know city staff will be looking at that closely in the permitting process. Yusuf: Okay. Tietz: I still think that there's options for this to be pushed back. And no need for a variance. 14 Chanhassen Planning Coression — June 21, 2016 9 Yusuf Without the use of a variance. I just want to give, I want to hear what Bob has to say about that please before we go on. Generous: Mr. Chairman. Our concern is if we push this back to meet the front yard setback you lose 4 feet on that house so we're down from 30 feet to a 26 foot wide structure. I believe economically yes it's difficult and from a practical standpoint we don't see them usually that narrow. I don't know if there's any way to bend it because that wetland starts to go to the west as you go north. They might pick up a little more space on that north end and maybe towards the south but not a lot so. Aller: And again I want to stay off the economics of the building itself. We can always put you know smaller, larger properties on varying situations but we want to look at the property itself and how it's situated and what's a reasonable sized house to put in there and I think it's consistent with the neighbors. Generous: It's very similar to the house to the south. Narrower than the one to the north. Weick: John were you suggesting moving the house, encroaching on the wetland setback? Tietz: Well I guess yeah. I guess I probably was but then it's a problem because yeah, I envisioned when we were talking about the depths to the wetland and what was the distance between it because it's not well presented on the survey where the wetland starts on the survey. just envisioned that there was more room to the west to play with and evidently there isn't. Generous: It's right at the wetland setback as it's shown on this plan. This survey. Tietz: Okay. Aller: Well and I guess the opportunity for the applicant would be to come back in if they're going to change their situation and come back in and ask for a different type of variance if they want to alter the plans. Generous: And when we initially met with the applicant we said we may be able to support a front yard setback but we would not support a variance from the wetland setback. Dan Kurth: That would have been my choice because then we meet all the requirements. And it's also changed... Aller: But that's why we have, in my opinion that's why we've got these rules in place is to protect that wetland and protect. Tietz: I stand corrected. I was, I misread that. 15 Chanhassen Planning Co•ssion — June 21, 2016 • Aller: And we're looking for that. Tietz: I misread that when I reviewed it and didn't, so yeah. Aller: We need to look at those alternatives. Weick: I propose a motion. Aller: Commissioner Weick. Weick: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves the variance request to permit the 25 foot front yard setback with up to 18 inches additional encroachment for an eave subject to the conditions of this staff report and adopting the attached Findings of Fact and Decision including a construction parking plan prior to final submittal. Aller: Thank you. Having a motion do I have a second? Yusuf: Second. Aller: I have a motion and a second properly before us. Any further discussion? Weick moved, Yusuf seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approve a five foot rather than an eight foot variance to permit a 25 foot front yard setback and permit up to an 18 inch eave encroachment into the 25 foot setback, subject to the following conditions and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Decision: A Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek watershed district permit is required. 2. The wetland boundary must be confirmed and a notice of decision confirming the wetland boundary must be obtained based upon this confirmation. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit prior to construction of a home. 4. The applicant must provide a construction parking plan prior to construction of a home. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Dan Kurth: Could I ask one question? So thank you for approving. Aller: Why don't we hold, is the question for public edification or maybe you want to meet with staff later. 16 CITY OF CHANHASSEN • P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 05/31/2016 12:21 PM Receipt No. 00316910 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Castle Gate Construction 742 Tilia Lane Victoria MN 55386- 691 Carver Beach Road Planning Case 2016-17 ------------------------------------------------------- Variance 200.00 Sign Rent 200.00 Recording Fees 50.00 GIS List 183.00 Total Cash Check 12168 Change 633.00 0.00 633.00 0.00 Chanhassen City Counti— February 22, 2016 CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's recommendations: Approve City Council Minutes dated February 8, 2016 2. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated February 16, 2016 3. Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated February 26, 2016 4. Resolution #2016-16: Approve Lease Assignment for Old Village Hall. 5. Resolution #2016-17: 2016 Street Improvements Project 16-01: Approve Plans & Specifications. 6. Mission Hills 3rd Addition: Approval of Final Plat, Development Contract and Construction Plans. 7. Resolution #2016-18: Approve Purchase of Fire Department Mini Pumper. Approve Massage License for The Transformation Club, 1363 Park Road, Suite A. Owner: Justin Yule. 9. Resolution #2016-19: Approve Resolution Authorizing No Park Zone along Lotus Trail. 10. Approve Award of Quote for Toro Sentinel Irrigation System. 11. 9641 Meadowlark Lane, Planning Case 2016-04: Approve Wetland Alteration Permit to Construct a Driveway on Property Zoned Rural Residential District (RR) and Located Lot 7, Block 1, Riley Lake Meadows. Applicant/Owner: David Vogel. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: COUNTY COMMISSIONER GAYLE DEGLER, PRESENTATION OF HIGHWAY 101 BRIDGE MEMENTO. Mayor Laufenburger: Welcome Commissioner. Gayle Degler: Thank you Mayor, council members. My name is Gayle Degler and I do live at 541 Pineview Court and I serve as. Mayor Laufenburger: In Chanhassen. In Chanhassen. 0 0 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 22, 2016 Mayor Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Tjomhom, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Paul Oehme, Kate Aanenson, Todd Hoffman, and Andrea McDowell Poehler PUBLIC PRESENT: David Vogel Rollie Neve 9641 Meadowlark Lane 7635 Nicholas Way Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you and welcome to this council meeting, those of you that are present in the chamber as well as those of you who are watching on Mediacom cable channel at home, and for the record note that all 5 members of the council are present this evening. Thank you. Our first action is regarding the agenda and I would like to add one item to the agenda. Item G-2 under New Business will be consideration of a resolution in support of Metro Council Reform in Governance. Is there any other modifications to the agenda? There being none may I ask for a motion to approve the agenda as modified. Councilwoman Ryan: So moved. Councilman McDonald: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much. I think it was, was that Councilwoman Ryan? Councilwoman Ryan: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, way to be quick on the draw Elise and Councilman McDonald. Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to approve the agenda amended to add Item G-2 under New Business, consideration of a resolution in support of Metro Council Reform in Governance. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: PC DAIQ June 21, 2016 B — Z CC DATE: July 11, 2016 (if necessary) REVIEW DEADLINE: July 19, 2016 CASE #: 2016-17 BY: RG, TJ, ML, JM, JS, SS "The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves the variance request to permit a 25 - foot front yard setback with up to 18 inches additional encroachment for an eve subject to the conditions in this staff report, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant9 "^} is requesting an eight -foot front yard setback , a variance (22 -foot setback) on property zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF) LOCATION: 691 Carver Beach Road (Lots _o 2969-2973 and 3018-3022, r `" Carver Beach) APPLICANT: Castle Gate Construction Travis Senefelder 742 Tilia Lane P. O. Box 694 Victoria, MN 55386 Wayzata, MN 55386 (952)449-2222 (651)216-9466 dcala5Ayahoo.com tisAlakesmn.com PRESENT ZONING: Single -Family Residential (RSF) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (net density 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 0.45 acres DENSITY: NA LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Planning Commission • • 691 Carver Beach Road Variance — Planning Case 2016-17 June 21, 2016 Page 2 of 4 PROPOSAUSUMMARY The applicant is requesting a front yard setback variance of eight (8) feet. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3. Variances Chapter 20, Article VI, Wetland Protection Chapter 20, Article XII, "RSF" Single -Family Residential District Carver Beach was platted in 1927. SITE CONDITIONS The site is currently heavily wooded with a steep drop-off from the front with an elevation of 949 to the rear with an elevation of 926. While the slope is over 30 percent, the elevation change is only 23 feet so it does not meet the definition of a bluff. Houses are built on either side of the property. Planning Commission • • 691 Carver Beach Road Variance — Planning Case 2016-17 June 21, 2016 Page 3 of 4 ANALYSIS The applicant has provided a survey with a potential house layout on the property. The survey shows a 26 -foot front setback and a wetland setback of 54.95 feet. A minimum 55 -foot setback from the wetland is required for the house with a 40 -foot setback for accessory structures. The property was delineated in May of 2008 by Svoboda Ecological Resources. As the delineation is more than three (3) years old, the boundary must be confirmed and a notice of decision confirming the wetland boundary must be obtained based upon this confirmation. Given the limited change to the area over the last eight (8) years, there is little reason to believe the boundary would be substantially different than in May of 2008. A MNRAM was also performed at this time and confirmed that the wetland fell into the management classification 1 which requires a 25 -foot buffer and a 30 -foot setback from that buffer. Given the high quality of the wetland and the limited water quality treatment in the Carver Beach area, preserving the buffers is important. Proposal The applicant is requesting an eight -foot variance from the 30 -foot front yard setback requirement to construct a home on the property. Alternatives While staff agrees that relief for the front yard setback is appropriate, because of the need to assure that the wetland buffer and setback are maintained, and provides a reasonable use of the property, we are concerned about a 22 -foot front yard setback not providing sufficient space for the parking of vehicles in the front driveway out of the public right-of-way. We are, therefore, proposing that a 25 -foot front yard setback be maintained with and additional exception of 18 inches to allow the eve to encroach within 23.5 feet of the front property line. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a five foot rather than eight -foot setback variance to permit a 25 -foot front yard setback and permit up to an 18 -inch eve encroachment into the 25 -foot setback subject to the following conditions and adoption of the attached findings of fact and decision: A Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District permit is required. The wetland boundary must be confirmed and a notice of decision confirming the wetland boundary must be obtained based upon this confirmation. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit prior to construction of a home. 0 0 Planning Commission 691 Carver Beach Road Variance — Planning Case 2016-17 June 21, 2016 Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENTS Findings of Fact and Decision Development Review Application Letter from Dan Kurth Dated 5/16/16 Building Elevation Foundation Plan Finished Basement Plan 1' Floor Plan 2nd Floor Plan Certificate of Survey Memorandum from Scott Sobiech, RPBCWD to Bob Generous Dated 6/8/16 Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List 0 CTI'Y OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION VARIANCE IN RE: Application of Castle Gate Construction and Travis Senefelder for an eight foot front yard setback variance to construct a single-family home on property zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF) — Planning Case 2016-17. On June 21, 2016, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential (RSF). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lots 2969-2973 and 3018-3022, Carver Beach, Carver County, Minnesota 4. Variance Findings — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The granting of the variance will permit the development of a single-family home on the site which is consistent with the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The practical difficulty is that the wetland in the rear yard forces the house to move closer to the street. The use of the property for a single-family home is reasonable. 0 c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: While the applicant has stated that moving he house closer to the road will save money on file, the need for the variance is to permit an appropriate sized home on the site. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The plight of the landowner is due to the location of a large wetland complex in the rear yard which forces development of the property closer to the road. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The variance will not alter the character of the area. Carver Beach has many homes that are built closer to the road. Just north of the property and across Carber Beach Road, there is a structure that appears to be right at the property line. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2016-17, dated June 27, 201y, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. The Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, approves a 25 front yard setback with up to 18 inches additional encroachment for an eve subject to the conditions in this staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 21' day of June, 2016. CITY OF CHANHASSEN M Chairman g:\plan\2016 planning cases\2016-17 691 carver beech road - varianceVindings of fact.docx COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEMENT Planning Division – 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CI�SSEN Mailing Address – P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Date: PC Date: CC Date: 60 -Day Review Date: Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply) (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ..... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit (CUP) $325 ❑ Single -Family Residence ................................ $325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Interim Use Permit (IUP) ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325 ❑ All Others......................................................... $425 ❑ Rezoning (REZ) ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD)..................$750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 ❑ All Others......................................................... $500 ❑ Sign Plan Review...................................................$150 ❑ Site Plan Review (SPR) ❑ Administrative ..................................................$100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts' ......................$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: (_ thousand square feet) 'Include number of existin employees: 'Include number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit ( units) ❑ Subdivision (SUB) ❑ Create 3 lots or less ........................................$300 ❑ Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot ( lots) ❑ Metes & Bounds (2 lots)..................................$300 ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑ Final Plat ..........................................................$700 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)` Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) 00 Variance (VAR) ................................................... $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ❑ All Others ....................................................... $275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ......................................:............... $100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, The appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. Notification Sign (City to install and remove)................................................................................................................ $200 j� Property Owners' List within 500' (City to generate after pre -application meeting)........ ...L:F....... ........... $3 per address I� addressLss) K Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply) ........................................ ........................... $50 per document ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Agreement ❑ Vacation ® Variance 4-10, — ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) [] Easements (_ easements) TOTAL FEE: Section 2: Required Information ___ �n Description of Proposal: Property Address or Location: Parcel M Z 60ty ii�� Total Acreage: ol t%�cbr Present Zoning: SelectOne Present Land Use Designation: Existing Use of Property: , Legal Description: One ❑ Check box is separate narrative is attached. t/Er m wk. ❑ No C*� �VE -C 4tA.H 7nninn. Seled One One APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. 1 will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress -of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: q, 57 /,a "-3 �P l� D &+/� �l contact: u Address: 7 T Ve Phone: — City/State/Zip' Lr- A!�6 A U, /(I 'J � � Cell: % c q� "ci q4 Email i Fax: Signature �yS Date: 7 l/ 7�/A�e PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: 7 r 4 V. Address: City/State/Zip:�4— ss Email: Signature: f Contact: Phone: Cell: t< Fax: Date: -5-4--a This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? `Other Contact Information: Property Owner Via: ❑ Email 2f Mailed Paper Copy Paper Copy Name: Address: Applicant Via: Email LK Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Engineer Via: Email Mailed F-1 nrhar` Via: M Email rl Mailed Paper Copy Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing (required). save FORM PRINT FORM SUBMIT FORM 0 To whom it may concern: 5/16/16 I am applying for a variance on front setback at 691 Carver Beach Road from 30ft. to 22ft. possible. The reason I need this is because the lot is heavily sloped from the street and makes it very difficult with 30 ft. setback in front to build without bringing in many loads of fill (already we will need many loads of fill for lot corrections for us to build on this lot, but the 8ft will make a huge difference on cost and viability to build on this lot). The lot has already a 1011. set back from street which would with a 22ft front set back have a distance of 32ft. to street from front of house. tj IT Another thing with smaller setback would help us build a normal diouse. There is a 55ft. wetland setback in back lot, which with front setback of 3011 would leave us with less than 24ft. for the depth of house. This is a very narrow house to be built on this large lot. Not only would this narrow house not be a typical house being built now of have been in past and would make the feasibility to sell this house harder. I do feel the smaller front yard setback will not hurt the neighborhood visually nor practicality of the houses nearby. Sincerely Dan Kurth Castle Gate Construction, Inc. President (contracted to build house on this lot, by Travis Senenfelder) • F - c� (L J N q ALN So7 .S!2)2 O)0 • _r E pQ N o N f qF OO N� m� N11 � 8 y m Z m �U F - c� (L J N q ALN So7 .S!2)2 O)0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ——ee-v.— — _ — — _ — -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _--11.-10•--- ---------------------%,. *—____ _-------_ wl 3teN Mee r� 014 Steel Seem In Pouratl WeY II Under Spancrete Workshop § I sum wl: r �on.eww �� .. lees. �. M �•oave, wu. _--__---_ ___xox________--- IT T tat Floor. 1,202SF 2nd Floor: 1.573 SF Fln. Somt: 950 SF • • Foundation Plan 1/4" = 1'-0" sw aea..e: 691 Carver Beach Rd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 -------- 8'--- a•— 13 '-- 71 r---e'>'---�- i ----------a'-'----- — — — — — — — --------------5r-2---- ----------28'-1'----------rt----- - - - - -- S'K S' F or 87� a' Fttppnncc�� Or w112'tren m w/lr trineoin - - - - - - - —_---- -e'-e'-- (2) 72 w/1 8 treneom S,P • 9 --- r 4 � mx� Garage Dr. 5p vWi 1 T ci Bdrm 5 ------ --23-3'-------- g 3rxM3. e 1 I I ----r�---- FamilyRm. t " I N ------ 32x93' F ------------tea'----- I r ----- T i 2'A� r----++'e--� — 4• 4 r I M 'a Under Spancrete Workshop I� e 4 aww � UnflnlShed 33Y 9B' ,A• eumo UUlky Rm ea' nAreaB183' I ii • 10-0• . me.p •a Finished /4psernent Plan 10Fa«: 1'2°2 IF Infi Id, 11r P 2nOFIOM: 1.573 SF j O 691 Carver Beach Rd. Fin. a rnt s_sF Doug un enwn Chanhassen, MN 55317 Mel LM. 3]25 SF (92 0) 4504624 ca s+ r----------------------�s0"--------------- -- -------ZO'-+g"--------r------19-w----- II-------z1'-r------- I -----8'8'_—t----_14'-4^_----T-0,--0•'g•_——_g-g•_—+•-g•l"'---1p-3'---�_---g'-N^--- 41 1 Bdrrn 30" wl I 1• • j a i� 1 I I 1 1 v #3 I I 4� I� —( L 1 j3r Bdrm�Ir----1—O1 #2 Master1 ,.g. E4 p 2ndBeoofO1,573 OmS,Ft. j o l 1 1 1 v 1 i ? I l I Bdrm Linen — I —--- v #4 _ l 1 1 j I 1 3a W.I.1 3 j Loft 13r O closetybl — s 10 4 I 4ate'--#{ —--„.-_.--- 1 I P 1k I� T W.I. Garage Iz 1 Ir IN closet = • --- t-----------gg r r--- .„ -- L"---T----------J—T--- —�--- ., -----------28-4----------- ---+g'J"----~-------19w------- ------------------W.V----------------------j 2nd Floor Plan 1l4” = 11_0.. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY J +9 d^ qbO® S It a q9 J o � ADRESS: 691 CARVER BEACH ROAD CHANHASSEN MN. 55317 OIf ceqq ` L X(907.0) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION x 905.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION q DENOTES IRON MONUMENT AT BOUNDARY CORNER DENOTES WOOD HUB PLACED AT BLDG OFFSET yt 01 •° a �'T oM1 N'" \ y DENOTES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS E 9 O 0 q + N `, a ^ '°� y �olob 944.00 = PROPOSED TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL ELEVATION e�944.50 = PROPOSED FRONT OF GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION p 934.00 = PROPOSED LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION •, \\ z .. - .,q m�F q 2 0 ` �„ �, 13R0 oW OR. POND °gym - Q\ ARR WATERSURFACE a4g q- vfJ 1 a o9''q ELEV. = 925.2 \ m^? �"(yo �tP " �" I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF t 1/19/2010a� °omF 0 9 m w H raw a'' A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF: 9�p E p e "^ r g RM W50 LOTS 2969 - 2973 AND 3018.3022, CARVER BEACH, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA 2 G.P � •'" FV 'O a $,�Os 99- 3 ^ �6' NN CmN ,A°q,9 AND THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON, AND ALL VISIBLE ° ° ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND. IT ALSO SHOWS THE ' LOCATION OF THE STAKES AS SET FOR A PROPOSED BUILDING, AS SURVEYED 2 9 BY ME OR UNDER MY DIREST SUPERVISION THIS 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2015 +01 o" G a • `r � ' A P J LAND SURVEYING, LLC a s q r Jy`p.JOjj/V +1 00„5fi m q'0~ fi BY: Q -r/BC: REGISTERED PAUL A. JOH N LAND LAND SURVEYOR, MINN. LIC. NO. 10938 : sursvEYDR `mA a 10938 .......... . ep~ f q FILE NAME ` D.GUNDERSON_691CARVERBEACHRD..try r PREPARED BY: PREPARED FOR: SCALE DATE DRAWN BY P J LAND SURVEYING, LLC DOUG GUNDERSON 30 Ft/In 6-29-2015 P A JOHNSON 12510 MCKUSICK ROAD NORTH INFIELD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP JOB REVISION SHEET { STILLWATER, MN 55082 W7297 WILD TURKEY LANE JOB 1/1 1/1 11� 651-303-0025 SHIOCTON, WI 54170 .� 920-450-4624 This map drawn with TRAVERSt YG. 5omvare Traverse PC 0 0 resourceful. naturally. BARR engineering and environmental consultants - Memorandum To: Bob Generous, Senior Planner, City of Chanhassen from: Scott Sobiech, PE Subject: 691 Carver Beach Rd Plan Review by Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District Date: June 8, 2016 c: Claire Bleser; Administrator Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District We appreciate the opportunity to provide preliminary comments on the proposed construction of a single family home at 691 Carver Beach Rd. The Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) received a request for preliminary review of this project on May 27, 2016. This is a preliminary review of the submitted information, additional comments may need to be addressed prior to issuance of a permit based on further review of the plans or revised information that is submitted. This proposed development will need a RPBCWD permit prior to beginning land disturbing activities. The following comments are based on the rules that appear to apply to this project and highlight the areas where revisions or additional information are needed to meet the RPBCWD rules. These review comments do not constitute approval, a variance, or exemption from the rules. Therefore this project will require permit approvals from the RPBCWD Board of Managers. Rule C: Erosion and Sediment Control Conformance with the Erosion and Sediment Control rule (Rule C) is required from the RPBCWD because more than 50 cubic yards of earth will be placed, altered, or removed and more than 5,000 square feet of land -surface area will be altered (Rule C, Section 2.1). The following comments must be addressed for the project to be in compliance with RPBCWD Rule C. The erosion control plan must include the following information: o Soil surfaces compacted during construction and remaining pervious upon completion of construction must be decompacted through soil amendment and/or ripping to a depth of 8 inches while taking care to avoid utilities, tree roots and other existing vegetation prior to final revegetation or other stabilization. o Construction site waste such as discarded building materials, concrete truck washout, chemicals, litter and sanitary waste must be properly managed. o Natural topography and soil conditions must be protected, including retention onsite of native topsoil to the greatest extent possible. Borr Engineering Co. 4700 West 77th Street, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com 0 0 To: Bob Generous, Senior Planner, City of Chanhassen From: Scott Sobiech, PE Subject: 691 Carver Beach Rd Plan Review by Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District Date: June 8, 2016 o Additional measures, such as hydraulic mulching and other practices as specified by the District must be used on slopes of 3:1(H:V) or steeper to provide adequate stabilization. o Final site stabilization measures must specify that at least six inches of topsoil or organic matter be spread and incorporated into the underlying soil during final site treatment wherever topsoil has been removed. The permittee must, at a minimum, inspect, maintain and repair all disturbed surfaces and all erosion and sediment control facilities and soil stabilization measures every day work is performed on the site and at least weekly until land -disturbing activity has ceased. Thereafter, the permittee must perform these responsibilities at least weekly until vegetative cover is established. The permittee will maintain a log of activities under this section for inspection by the District on request. Rule D: Wetland and Creek Buffers Wetlands on this parcel appear to be downgradient from the proposed site activities. Because the proposed work triggers RPBCWD's Stormwater Management Rule (Rule J) and there are wetlands downgradient of the activities, Rule D, Subsections 2.1a and 3.1 require buffer around these wetlands. To conform to the RPBCWD Rule D the following revisions are needed: o Because a wetland appears to be downgradient, a wetland delineation by a certified wetland delineator is needed for the wetlands downgradient of the proposed construction to determine the buffer location. Because the project is located on an existing single family home parcel, a buffer with a 20 foot average, 10 foot minimum width must be provided. o A wetland buffer area must be shown on the plans and indicated by permanent, free- standing markers at the buffers upland edge. o Please provide an example detail for the marker locations noted on the plans. An example detail is available for download from the RPBCWD website (www.rpbcwd.org/permits). o A note must be added to the plans indicating: The potential transfer of aquatic invasive species (e.g., zebra mussels, Eurasian watermilfoil, etc.) must be minimized to the maximum extent possible. o Before any work subject to District permit requirements commences, buffer areas and maintenance requirements must be documented. The applicant may meet this requirement by entering into a maintenance declaration recorded with the County. Rule J: Stormwater Management Conformance with the RPBCWD Stormwater Management rule (Rule J) will be required for this project because more than 50 cubic yards of earth will be placed, altered, or removed or more than 5,000 square feet of land -surface area will be altered (Rule J, Section 2.1) and the parcel is within 500 feet of and 0 0 To: Bob Generous, Senior Planner, City of Chanhassen From: Scott Sobiech, PE Subject: 691 Carver Beach Rd Plan Review by Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District Date: June 8. 2016 draining to a wetland. Comments provided below are preliminary and general in nature and the applicant should review the RPBCWD's Stormwater Management Rule for full details on submittal requirements. • General Comments: o In accordance with RPBCWD Rule 1, Subsection 3A the project must provide for the construction, installation, or implementation of a stormwater-management BMP. Wetland buffer are allowed to be credited to the stormwater requirement per Rule 1, Subsection 3.5. Permit applicant must provide a draft maintenance declaration and inspection plan for review and approval by the RPBCWD. Once approved the declaration must be recoreded with the County. A maintenance declaration template is available on the permits page of the RPBCWD website. (http://www.rpbcwd.org/permits/). Summary Based on the information provided to date, the proposed design does not meet the RPBCWD rules and a permit from the RPBCWD will be required prior to construction to likely cover the following: Erosion and Sediment Control, Wetlands and Buffers, and Stormwater Management. The permit application and detailed information on the RPBCWD rules are available for download on the RPBCWD website: htto://www.rpbcwd.org/i)ermits/. Please contact us with any questions. 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on June 9, 2016, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of a request for a front yard setback variance on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 691 Carver Beach Road — Planning Case 2016-17 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this J16 day of 2016. otary Public Kim . Meuwissen, Deputy "'�, JENNIFER ANN POTTER �6 Notary Publ'�c-Minnesota JIM 3 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a front yard setback variance on property zoned Proposal: Single Family Residential (RSF). Applicant: Castle Gate Construction. Owner: Travis Applicant: Senefelder. Property 691 Carver Beach Road Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: W What Happens Wthe 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.c!.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-17. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Generous Questions & by email at beenerous(cDci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Questions & 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this !tem will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations. Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Manning Commission. City ordinances require all propend within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pediment Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will dose the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly a partly the Planning Commission'a recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialMtlusldal. • Minnesota Stale Statute 519.99 requlres all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may lake several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Manning Department regarding its status and scheduling for Me City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersonlrepresentative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any interested pemon(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public heeding, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any comespondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be Included In the report, lease contact the Panning Stag person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a front yard setback variance on property zoned Proposal: Single Family Residential (RSF). Applicant: Castle Gate Construction. Owner: Travis Applicant: Senefelder. Property 691 Carver Beach Road Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. • at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.c!.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-17. if you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Generous Questions & by email at beenerous(rDci chanhassen mn.us or by phone at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. NEWI Sign up to receive email and/or text notifications when meeting agendas, packets, minutes and videos are uploaded to the city's website. Go to • www.ci.chanhassen.mmus/notifyme to sign up! City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Manned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews. Condixonal and Interim Uses, Wall Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Man Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 5D) feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any Interested party is imhted to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a repos on Me subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a pan of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss me Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezenings and land use amendments from residential to commerdallindustaal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be promised within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person calming to follow an Item through the process should check with the Manning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A nelghbonood spokespersonGepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any Interested personis). • Because the Manning Commission holds the public hearing, Me Gty Coundl does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be inducted In the report to the Gly Council. 0 you wish to have something to be Included in the report, lease contact the Pending Staff person named on the notification. Taxpayer Name Taxpayer Address Taxpayer City -State -Zip ALLEN I & BARBARA S OLSON 631 BROKEN ARROW DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9569 BENJAMIN B NEWTON 730 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9422 BRIAN J TIMM 6860 LOTUS TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9559 CARVER BEACH PROPERTIES 332 2ND ST EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-1806 CHAD R & ROBIN E POINTER 6896 NAVAJO DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9571 CHARLES R L WORSFOLD 6900 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9560 CHRISTOPHER M LANDON 620 FOX HILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9512 CHRISTOPHER MARK KORN 739 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9422 COLIN G CARRUTH 753 WOODHILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9561 CONST_ANCE M CERVILLA 650 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2101 COREY P JUREK 720 PREAKNESS LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9238 CRAIG RHATIGAN 599 BROKEN ARROW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9569 CURTIS C & JUDITH N QUINER 725 PONDEROSA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9419 CURTIS PAUL BJORLIN 824 LONE EAGLE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9417 DANIEL REARDON WOLFF 6891 NAVAJO DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9572 DAVID & MELINDAJ ENRIGHT 795 PONDEROSA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9419 DENNIS F BRISTOR 750 PREAKNESS UN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9238 DUSTIN HAAG 7001 DERBY DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9286 FELIX 5 THOMPSON 6899 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9205 FLORENCE L KEEFER 407 OAK ST N APT 409 CHASKA, MN 55318-2084 GARY T & BEVERLY C FOSTER 710 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9422 GEOFFREY SCHROF 671 BROKEN ARROW DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9569 GRACE M CRAMOND 739 WOODHILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9561 GREGORY N BITTLE 6879 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9554__ JACOB VOELTZ 685 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2101 JAMES & ELLEN CRANSTON LIVING_ TRUST 695 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2101 JAMES HENDERSON 678 BROKEN ARROW DR CHANHASSEN, MN 5_5317-9569 JAMES V & MARY L FRERICH 651 BROKEN ARROW DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9569 JAMES W TALUS 8350 RED ROCK RD EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344-1425 JANICE MARIE HAZELTON 740 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9422 JASON M & HEATHER C BEUMER 6911 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9560 JASON MOE 705 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9422 JEFFREY B & MARY V KING 6886 LOTUS TRL ICHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9559 0 • JEFFREY L KLEINER REV TRUST 655 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2101 JEFFREY R KASK 6890 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9205 JEROME P NORTHRUP 26640 DREXEL AVE NEW PRAGUE, MN 56071-8835 JOHN C & CLAIRE E NYGREN 740 PREAKNESS LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9238 JOHN D JR & LISA LENSEGRAV 6880 LOTUS TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9559 JOHN STUTZMAN 6901 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9560 JON ALAN LANG 640 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9428 KENNETH W & COLLEEN J VERMEER 730 PREAKNESS LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9238 KURTIS J & MARY E ANDERSON 6870 LOTUS TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9559 LANA LEE MATSON 6893 NAVAJO DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9572 MARK A & JULIE C QUINER 6889 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9205 MARK W & VALERIE NELSON 6890 NAVAJO DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9571 MRP 401K PLAN & TRUST NORTHERN INVESTMENT PROPERTY LLC PAUL T EIDSNESS PHILIP M HANSON RANDAL C RUTLEDGE RICHARD J WELLS RICKI LEE HALE 331 WINDWARD ISLAND PO BOX 694 5338 MAJESTIC CT 621 CARVER BEACH RD 680 CARVER BEACH RD 700 CARVER BEACH RD 600 FOX HILL DR CLEARWATER BEACH, FL 33767-2328 WAYZATA, MN 55391-0694 CAPE CORAL, FL 33904-5942 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2101 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2101 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9422 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9512 ROBERT IAN AMICK 581 FOX HILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9538 ROBERT J TIGHE 743 PREAKNESS LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9238 SHERI A KRAMER 733 PREAKNESS LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9238 STEPHEN & FRANCES SYVERSON 760 PREAKNESS LN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9258 STEPHEN KENNEDY 761 PONDEROSA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9419 TIMOTHY P & MAUREEN SCHILLING 7021 DERBY DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9286 TODD & KRISTIN JACKSON 621 BROKEN ARROW DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9569 VICKI L HEVEY 780 WOODHILL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9561 WESLEY WALTER WESTERMANN 710 PONDEROSA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9419 WYATT CRANE 1760 PONDEROSA DR ICHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9419 171 • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEFWTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 10my AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL OF CHANHASSEN Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline Agency Review Request Date: May 26, 2016 Agency Review Response Deadline: June 9, 2016 Date Application Filed: May 20, 2016 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Robert Generous, AICP 952-227-1131 bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Senior Planner E Building Official Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60 -Day Review Period Deadline: June 21, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. July 11, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. July 19, 2016 Application: Request for a front yard setback variance on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 691 Carver Beach Road Planning Case: 2016-17 Web Page: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-17 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: Federal Agencies: Adjacent Cities: ❑ Attorney ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Chaska E Building Official ❑ US Fish & Wildlife ❑ Eden Prairie E Engineer ❑ Jackson Township E Fire Marshal Watershed Districts: ❑ Minnetonka E E Forester ❑Carver County WMO ❑Shorewood El Victoria E Park Director Water Resources ❑ Lower River El Law Enforcement E] Minnehaha Creek Adjacent Counties: E Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Carver County Agencies: Utilities: ❑ ❑ Hennepin Scott ❑ El Community Development E] Cable TV — Meds School Districts: El Engineer Environmental Services E] Electric — Minnesota Minnesota Valley El Historical Society ❑ Electric —Xcel Energy E] Eastern Carver County 112 El Parks ❑ Magellan Pipeline ❑ Minnetonka 276 ❑ Soil & Water Conservation District ❑ Natural Gas — Centel Energy ❑ Phone — Centuryll Other Agencies: State Agencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad ElBoard of Water & Soil Resources E]MN Authority Landscape Arboretum El ❑ Health Historical Society E] SouthWest Transit ❑ TC&W Railroad El Natural Resources -Forestry ❑ Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control ❑ Transportation COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP71!RTMENT Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1130 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 OiCITY OF CBANAASSEN AGENCY REVIEW REQUEST LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Please review and respond no later than the review response deadline Agency Review Request Date: May 26, 2016 Agency Review Response Deadline: June 9, 2016 Date Application Filed: May 20, 2016 Contact: Contact Phone: Contact Email: Robert Generous, AICP 952-227-1131 bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Senior Planner ® Building Official Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: 60 -Day Review Period Deadline: June 21, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. July 11, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. July 19, 2016 Application: Request for a front yard setback variance on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 691 Carver Beach Road Planning Case: 2016-17 Web Page: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2016-17 In order for staff to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. City Departments: Federal Agencies: Adjacent Cities: ❑ Attorney ❑ Army Corps of Engineers ❑ Chaska ® Building Official ❑ US Fish & Wildlife ❑ Eden Prairie ® Engineer ❑ Jackson Township ® Fire Marshal Watershed Districts: [_1 Minnetonka ® ® Forester[-) Park Director ❑Carver Carver County E] Victoria ® Water Resources E] r Lower MN River El Enforcement ❑ Minnehaha Creek Adjacent Counties: ® Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Carver County Agencies: Utilities: ❑ ❑ Hennepin Scott ❑ El Community Development ❑ Cable TV — Mediacom School Districts: ❑ Engineer Environmental Services ❑ Electric—Minnesota Valley ❑ Historical Society ❑ Electric — Xcel Energy ❑ Eastern Carver County 112 ❑ Parks ❑ Magellan Pipeline ❑ Minnetonka 276 ❑ Soil & Water Conservation District ❑ Natural Gas — CenterPoint Energy ❑ Phone — CenturyLink Other Agencies: State Agencies: ❑ Hennepin County Regional Railroad ElBoard of Water & Soil Resources ❑ Authority MN Landscape Arboretum El El Health Historical Society E) SouthWest Transit ❑ TC&W Railroad El Natural Resources -Forestry ❑ Natural Resources -Hydrology ❑ Pollution Control ❑ Transportation 0 0 0 0 0 0 IWI] 200.00' Property Card • Parcel ID Number 01600431 Taxpayer Information I NORTHERN INVESTMENT PROPERTY LLC PO BOX 694 WAYZATA, MN 55391-0694 Property Address Address 691 CARVER BEACH RD City CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 r Parcel Information Uses Res V Land GIS Acres 0.45 Net Acres 0.45 Deeded Acres Plat CARVER BEACH Lot Block Tax Description LOTS 2969 - 2973 8, 3018 - 3022 Building Information Building Style Above Grade Bedrooms Last Sale Finished Scl Ft $39,400.00 Year Built Garage N Bathrooms Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve 0276 1 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF N N I N Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2015 Values (Payable 2016) 2016 Values (Payable 2017) Last Sale Land $39,400.00 $79,400.00 Date of Sale 08/14/2015 Building $0.00 $0.00 Sale Value $18,000.00 Total $39,400.00 $79,400.00 The data provided herewith Is for reference purposes only. This data is hot suitable for legal. ery ineenng. surveying or other similar purposes. Carver County does not guarantee the accuracy of be indernabon contained herein. This data is furnished on an as is basis and Carver County makes no representations or warranties, either expressed or implied, for the merchantablity or fihtass of the information provided for any purpose. This disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Salutes §466.03 and the user of be data provided herein acknowledges that Carver County shall not be liable for any damages, and by using this data in any way expressly waives all bairns, and agrees to defend, indemnify, add hold harmless Carver County, its officialso&evrs, agents, employees. etc. from any antl all claims brought by anyone who uses the information provided for herein, its employees or agents, or CARVER third parties which arise out of user's access. By acceptance of this data, the user agrees not to transmit this data or provide access to it or any pad of it to another party unless the user includes COUNTY With the data a copy of this disclaimer. Friday, May 27, 2016 Carver County, MN