The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-19_6780 YUMA DRIVE / LOTS 1391-1400, CARVER BEACH0 0 The contents of this file have been scanned. Do not add anything to it unless it has been scanned. 93 CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Thomas J. Campbell Roger N. Knutson Thomas M. Scott Elliott B. Knetsch Joel J. Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehler Soren M. Mattick John F. Kelly Henry A. Schaeffer, Ill Alina Schwartz Shana N. Conklin David H. Schultz 1380 Corporate Center Curve Suite 317 • Fagan, MN 55121 651-452-5000 Fax 651-452-5550 www.ck-12W.eOm September 25, 2014 CITYWCHANHASSM RECEIVEr) Ms. Kim Meuwissen SEP ` l City of Chanhassen CIONMPLANNING DEPT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Chanhassen — Miscellaneous Recording Dear Kim: Enclosed herewith for your file is the original, recorded Variance 2014-19. Please note that this Variance was recorded with the Registrar of Titles on August 7, 2014, as Torrens Document No. T 192887. If you have any questions regarding the above, please give me a call. cjh Enclosure 1756920 Very truly yours, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association By: Carole J. Hoeft Legal Assistant CITYOFCHANHASWi RECEIVED SEP 2 9 2014 r,HgNHAWPlAMNNQDEPT Cr`Y0FCHAMVWW g5rml'Fn SLr .- NPLANNING DIP, , SCANNED 0 0 Document No. OFFICE OF THE STRAR T 192887 CARVERICOIJNTOF TITLES Y, MINNESOTA Receipt # Certified Recorded on August 07, 2014 2:24 PM 192887 Cert. # 31599 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2014-19 Wrw'S Mark Lundgren Registrar of Titles 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustment, approves Planning Case #2014-19 a 9.5 -foot setback variance including the roof eave from the 30 -foot front yard setback requirement to allow a three -car detached garage on property zoned Single -Family Residential District. 2. Property. The variance is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as follows: Lots 1391 — 1400, Carver Beach, Carver County, Minnesota 3. Condition. The variance approval is subject to the following condition: a. The pavement for the existing driveway shall be removed. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse. Dated: July 15, 2014 SCANNED W 0 0 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF CHANHASSEN �Thhomas A. Furlong, h AND: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) ��i The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this %23 day of �J t,c Iq 2014 by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. L I, NOTARY kUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 KIM T. MEUWISSEN Chanhassen, MN 55317 Notary Public -Minnesota (952)227-1100 , M,C�' F.Mires,Nn 31, 21115 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FAX (952) 227-1110 TO: Campbell Knutson, PA 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE JOB NO. 7/29/14 2014-19 ATTENTION Carole Hoeft RE: Document Recording WE ARE SENDING YOU ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change Order ❑ Pay Request ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 7/15/14 Variance 2014-19 Lots 1391-1400, Carver Beach THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return ® For Recording ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO: Dan & Sue DeGolier Mike McFeters, Crosstown Builders, Inc. SIGNED: copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints ��V i Meuwissen (952) 227-1107 SCANNED N enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. N CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2014-19 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustment, approves Planning Case #2014-19 a 9.5 -foot setback variance including the roof eave from the 30 -foot front yard setback requirement to allow a three -car detached garage on property zoned Single -Family Residential District. 2. Procerty. The variance is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as follows: Lots 1391 —1400, Carver Beach, Carver County, Minnesota 3. Condition. The variance approval is subject to the following condition: a. The pavement for the existing driveway shall be removed. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse. Dated: July 15, 2014 CITY Or --F CHANHASSEN BY: L (SEAL) JThomas A. Furlong, Mal AND: �"� � " " on4 Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) "'i The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this.: day of s' i c1q 2014 by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 NOTARY UBLIC =MEUWISSENM6 CITY OF 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone. 952.22)1100 Fax 952.227.1110 0 0 July 23, 2014 Mr. Mike McFeters Crosstown Builders, Inc. 4428 Colfax Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55345 Re: Planning Case #2014-19 Setback Variance for Detached Garage Dear Mr. McFeters: Building Inspections This letter is to confirm that on July 15, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning Phone: 952.227.1180 Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustment, approved Planning Fax: 952.2271190 Case #2014-19 for a 9.5 -foot setback variance including the roof eave from the Fax: 952.227.1310 30 -foot front yard setback requirement to allow a three -car detached garage on Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 property zoned Single -Family Residential District. Approval is subject to the Fax: 952.227.1170 following condition: Finance The pavement for the existing driveway shall be removed and the area re - Phone 952.227.1140 vegetated. Fax: 952.227.1110 You will need to provide a revised survey showing the location of the proposed Phone::952227.1120 garageas Park Recreation roved b the variance of building permit application. A approved y ance as part your g pp Fax: 952.227.1110 variance shall become void within one year unless substantial action has been taken by the petitioner in reliance thereof. Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at Phone: 952.227.1400 (952) 227-1131 or by email bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Smcer� Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 / Fax: 952.227.1110 Public works Robert Generous, AICP 7901 Park Place Senior Planner Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 c: Dan & Sue DeGolier Senior Center Building Permit File Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 ec: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Website Drew Ingvalson, Planning hltem www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us Jerry Mohn, Building Official g:\plan\2014 planning casm\2014-19 6780 yuma varianc6approval letter.doc 03NNVOS Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION IN RE: Application of Crosstown Builders, Inc. and Daniel & Susan Degolier for a variance from the setback requirements to allow for a detached accessory structure 20.5 feet from the front property line including a two -foot eave on property zoned Single -Family Residential District (RSF) — Planning Case 2014-19. On July 15, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential District (RSF). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is as follows: Lots 1391-1400, Carver Beach, Carver County, Minnesota 4. Variance Findings — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The subject site is zoned Single -Family Residential District. The purpose of the request is to permit a 20.5 -foot front yard setback to allow a detached three -car garage. City ordinance permits detached accessory structures. The 9.5 -foot encroachment into the required front yard provides adequate separation between the structure and the street and maintains the required separation from the adjacent property. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. SCANNED Finding: The practical difficulty of complying with the front yard setback is due to the lot configuration of the property. The west property line has a jog in it which creates a narrow section of the lot near the house making it difficult to meet setbacks. The location of the garage should be in close proximity to the house. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The stated intent of the request is for a detached three -car garage. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The difficulty of complying with the front yard setback is due to the lot configuration of the property. The west property line has a jog in it which creates a narrow section of the lot near the house making it difficult to meet setbacks. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the character of the area. As was shown in the staff report, numerous front yard setback variances have been granted within 500 feet of the property. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2014-19, dated July 15, 2014, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. DECISION "The Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustment, approves Planning Case #2014-19 a 9.5 -foot setback variance including the roof cave from the 30 -foot front yard setback requirement to allow a three -car detached garage on property zoned Single -Family Residential District and subject to the condition that the existing driveway be removed." ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15* day of July, 2014 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chairman 2 I or 0 0 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JULY 15, 2014 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, Lisa Hokkanen, Kim Tennyson, Maryam Yusuf, and Steve Weick MEMBERS ABSENT: Dan Campion STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; and Bob Generous, Senior Planner PUBLIC HEARING: 6780 YUMA DRIVE: REOUEST FOR VARIANCE TO SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE ON PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RSF) AND LOCATED AT 6780 YUMA DRIVE. APPLICANT: CROSSTOWN BUILDERS, INC. OWNER: DANIEL & SUSAN DEGOLIER. PLANNING CASE 2014-19. Generous: Thank you Chairman Aller and commissioners. As you stated this is Planning Case 2014-19. The applicant is Crosstown Builders. The property is located at 6780 Yuma Drive which is in our Carver Beach area of the community. An older subdivision from 1929 and so all the properties are made up of individual smaller lots. The applicant is requesting a variance so that he can locate the detached garage 7.27 feet from the side property line. 10 foot side yard setbacks are required and actually the variances for a .73 foot setback because they have a 2 foot overhang on their eave and so we would have to count that against the setback also. So we show that, what they're trying to do is put a 3 car detached garage approximately 10 feet from the end of their stairway. To do this and maintain the 30 foot front yard setback they're forced back to that corner point on their property. While we believe the 3 car garage is a good improvement for the property there are some alternatives that they could look at for this and staff does not support this variance in this location. They could shift the building approximately 25 feet to the north. Between 24 and 25 feet and then same footprint complies with the zoning setback. It does go right over the center of a large tree that's on the property and so the, however this is staffs initial recommendation because it does comply with ordinance and it provides them with the 3 car garage that they're requesting. However we did look at an alternative that they go, shift the building forward and look at a front yard setback. This would be a 9.5 foot setback from the front property line. The building would be actually 7 t/2 feet closer to the street than the 30 foot setback requirement is but again they have that 2 foot eave so any variance would have to include that. This building would be down approximately a foot from their existing location. We assume that they would follow the grade that they're proposing for the driveway and then they meet their approximately a 7 percent slope which is under the 10 percent slope requirement that we have under city code for private driveways. Again staff recommends that we deny the variance and that they go with the initial, with a design that complies with ordinance. However if you believe some relief is necessary we prefer the front yard setback variance because it would be more fitting with the neighborhood. If you look at the table that we have for variances, there are several front yard setback variances that have been approved within 500 feet so there is a sort of character that's been established. These are smaller designed roadways. There will be adequate separation from the building to the front property line. I did draft an alternate Findings of Fact should the Planning Commission decide to approve a variance request. With that I'd be happy to answer any questions. Aller: Questions? 0 0 Chanhassen Planning Commission — July 15, 2014 Weick: Yeah, in the second version with the front yard setback. Generous: Yes. Weick: Or for a variance. Is that still a 3 vehicle? Generous: Yes. What we did is took their design and just shifted it forward so that it can comply with that side yard setback. Weick: And then if they moved it the other way, and you said there's a big tree there. Generous: Yes. It's approximately 10 feet north of the proposed location of the garage. Weick: Would they have to get approval to cut down the tree to do that or no? Generous: No. Weick: Because it's on the property there. Generous: Right. Weick: Okay. Generous: They'd like to preserve it. Actually pushing it forward provides a better opportunity to preserve it because it takes out more of the root zone from any compaction or construction activity. The City Forester is concerned that whatever they do because oaks are so sensitive, any construction activity may kill it anyway and so it might be just as wise to take it out initially but they have an opportunity to do that if they use Best Management Practices. Weick: Thank you. Aller: And if we provide the, or if we go with Option 3 which would be the easement to the north, or variance to the north then their footprint for the driveway would be decreased. Generous: Right. There'd be a little less hard cover on the site. Aller: And the garage would maintain the same footprint? Generous: Yes. Aller: And they also would, if the other option, Option 2 makes the walk from the house to the proposed garage that much farther. Generous: Yeah, about 25 foot more. Aller: So you lose a tree and you have to walk. And your driveway gives you more hard cover. Okay. ] don't have any further questions. Anyone else? Great. So with that I'll open up the public hearing portion of the meeting. And so anyone wishing to come forward and speak either for or against the item, the applicant wishing to come forward. P - • • Chanhassen Planning Commission — July 15, 2014 Mike: I'm Mike from Crosstown Builders and there's a few other pieces of the picture. One is that there are actually are more trees involved than just the one. It is a realsubstantialoak that we're talking about that is the primary concern but both toward the street of that and really kind of clustered around it are kind of a number of other trees that are, that would need to be taken out in order to put it where that first choice would be. The first of the examples. It does seem to us like moving it forward would work real well in our situation. To move it back where we originally proposed it, there is a garage that is on the neighbor's property that actually is about a foot off their property line so. Aller: Right. Mike: There's kind of a precedence set for how close these are to that side line and that neighbor has said he's not opposed at all to us putting it where our original plan was but my client and I both feel that either of those choices where we're not taking down the tree is plenty suitable for us. Aller: Okay. Have you had an opportunity to take a look at the recent rains with the runoff on that garage? What's the water drainage situation over there by that property line? Mike: There's actually a pretty good slope that heads toward that curbed street to my thinking that, that is going to take most of that water that way and with, you know if there's any concerns about that we'd be happy to remedy that with gutters and you know drain tile, down spout, whatever. You know it would really be that back slope that would be the issue and we could pretty easily address that with drain tile and gutter and down spout. Aller: Alright. Any other questions? And it's a, could you tell me about the 3 car garage? Is it going to have windows? Mike: It will have windows. Aller: Just 2 and 3? Mike: Yeah we submitted plans for it. It will have windows. A service door and it will match the siding and you know the pitch and overhang and everything the existing house has so it fits in well with that. The current garage is a tuck under so there is garage there now but it's small for today's vehicles and their plan is to turn that into living space since it's kind of right in the house set up. The one other thought that they have with the possible placement of it being where that tree is now would be that that puts it kind of a long way from the house and for a couple of reasons that's an issue. I think one is that it's sort of, when you drive by it would almost look like it's not part of that house. It's, you know it's a big, long lot that curves that way so it looks a little like a structure sitting by itself over there. And then the other thing would just be the convenience of getting to it in the winter you know. Aller: Alright, thank you. Anyone have any questions? Alright. Thank you very much sir. Mike: Alright, thanks. Aller: Anyone else wishing to come forward can do so at this time. Speak either for or against the item before us. If you could state your name and address for the record sir please. Dan Degolier: Yeah I'm Dan Degolier. The address is 6780 Yuma Drive. Aller: Welcome. Chanhassen Planning Commission — July 15, 2014 Dan Degolier: And everything that has been stated is pretty accurate and I have talked to the rest of the neighbors and they're all in favor of you know everyone that I was able to get a hold of, a dozen or so, and they're all in favor of improving the property. Aller: Sure. Dan Degolier: And I just had a quick chance to talk with my wife and we, I think the second one where we move it forward, that's fine with us and leave that extra, that 10 feet from the back. Aller: Great. Dan Degolier: We'd prefer not, we just had this, we have 2 big oak trees. We just had those trimmed this winter so we'd prefer not to mess with those at all. Aller: We love our trees here. Dan Degolier: Yeah. We do too. I do too so. Aller: That's wonderful. Great. Dan Degolier: Any questions or anything else? Undestad: Just one quick one. Dan Degolier: Sure. Undestad: You mentioned you're going to eliminate your tuck under garage now? Dan Degolier: Yes. Undestad: So is the driveway? Dan Degolier: Yeah. Undestad: Get rid of all that? Dan Degolier: Yeah, we're going to take the drive away. Do all away and landscape that and put a patio in. More like maybe a fire pit, grass and patio area. Undestad: Okay. Aller: Great. Thank you very much sir. We have someone else coming forward. Hi. Sue Degolier. I'm the other half. Sue Degolier, 6780 Yuma Drive. Aller: Welcome. Sue Degolier: Last time I heard like speak now or forever hold your peace was 40 years ago when we got married so I thought I'd better say something now. This is the only chance I'm going to get so, I just would like to be sure you understand the reason why we're doing this isn't because we want to build a 3 car garage. It's that we've added 4 grandchildren and we need the family room space so we spent a lot of 4 v '' • • Chanhassen Planning Commission — July 15, 2014 time trying to figure out how could we do that because we like where we live. So we came up with turning the tuck under garage into family room and there's a half bath I think is what you'd call it. Mike: Yeah. Sue Degolier: That we would make a three-quarter bath and then where could we put the garage with our funny shaped yard so that's how we came up this plan and I agree, I think we can live with a shorter garage because less shoveling. Less to pay for paving the driveway and the trees are an important value for us to preserve so it's part of what we like about Chanhassen so. Aller: Great. Sue Degolier: Questions for us while we're here. Aller: I think you've answered them all. We like family too. Sue Degolier: Yeah and it's, the coming across the old driveways would all be, we'd put in some probably pine trees and shrubbery and kind of landscape that and bank it up a bit so there'd be a privacy element there so thanks for your consideration. Aller: Thank you. Anyone else wishing to come forward speaking for or against. Seeing no one come forward I'm going to close the public hearing. Open it up for discussion. Hokkanen: I was just concerned with the other driveway and with 3 accesses to the property so that goes away. Aller: It sounds like that's gone. Hokkanen: Yeah. Aller: With the variance granting. And I like the north. It's less hard cover. It certainly isn't their fault the property is shaped like it is and so I think they meet the requirements with this particular plan for a variance. Aanenson: Just to be clear, we should add as a condition of approval that the, that driveway, the original be removed. Aller: Be removed. Aanenson: I think that should be added just to be clear of our, so while the recommendation there say within we would add condition that says removal of existing driveway. Generous: And replace with vegetation. Weick: So as a matter of process we are actually approve, we would be approving a variance still with this version correct? Generous: Correct. Aanenson: Correct. Instead of a rear yard we're now doing a front yard variance. Chanhassen Planning Commission — July 15, 2014 • Aller: A front yard. Weick: Got it. Aanenson: We flip flopped it. We set it forward. Aller: And in looking at the chart of all the variances it appears that the variances that have been granted were primarily for home purposes. For personal residences purposes. Not garage purposes but I tie that into the fact that they're really gaining use of a, reasonable use of the personal residence and I think that's really what the variances are for is to let them use the property in a reasonable fashion so. Weick: Well and technically there's a slight rear variance here too, right? Generous: No. Aanenson: Actually the green is the. Generous: The green would be the setback line. We left the, their proposal. Weick: Oh front setback variance. I got you. Alright. Hokkanen: So the front would be. Weick: So the eave doesn't even go over the. Generous: Well the eave can encroach into the 10 foot setback. Weick: Okay. Generous: But once you grant a variance it becomes part of the variance and you don't get an exception to it. Weick: Appreciate it. No it's clear, thank you. Aller: Great. I'll entertain a motion at this time if someone would like to make it. Aanenson: Do you have a motion? Generous: No. They would approve a 9 %z foot front yard setback variance. Tennyson: I'll make a motion. Aanenson: Can I offer you something quick here because we changed the motion that's on the slide. Generous: Well it's on the Decision. Weick: It's on the back. Generous: That one that I gave you at the bottom, yeah. 6 d y v y • • Chanhassen Planning Commission — July 15, 2014 Tennyson: Yeah, plus the condition. Okay. The Chanhassen Planning Commission acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustment approves Planning Case #2014-19, a 9.5 foot setback variance including the roof eave from the 30 foot front yard setback requirement to allow a 3 car detached garage on property zoned Single Family Residential District and subject to the condition that the original or existing driveway be removed. Aller: Okay Commissioner Tennyson has a motion before us. Do I have a second? Hokkanen: Second. Aller: Having a motion and a second, any further discussion? Tennyson moved, Hokkanen seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustment approves Planning Case #2014-19, a 9.5 foot setback variance including the roof eave from the 30 foot front yard setback requirement to allow a 3 car detached garage on property zoned Single Family Residential District and subject to the condition that the existing driveway be removed. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of6to0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Yusuf noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated June 17, 2014 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS: None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: Aanenson: I did include in your packet the new businesses so you've got a list of, and that's via the sign permits so you can see we've got a few new education, insurance, assisted living, Beehive. That is open. There are a few residents living there and another insurance company so just kind of a good way. Sometimes people go into existing businesses and the like. That's all I had for that. I did want to talk about the future Planning Commission items then. On August 51, which would be our normal next regular meeting, which is the first Tuesday in August is actually National Night Out so we hope that you're with your neighborhood and doing, having a neighborhood get together so we will not have a meeting so you can attend that. On August 191 we will have 4 items in, or we're anticipating on Friday that we'll see the Villages on the Pond project come in and that's a little strip center there in front of the bank. We also anticipate a site plan out in the auto Motorplex, auto repair. That will be adjacent to Audubon Boulevard. We have a conditional use for extension of the height of a cell tower and then a conditional use for outdoor storage. We do anticipate a couple other projects coming in in September. Both September meetings so we're going to have some busy agendas. And with that we're going to have our, this is our third annual joint commission tour so we thought it'd be really interesting with the last storms that we've had, we've had like 5 inches of rain and then we had another inch last week. We have some areas where we've had, you can see the effects of building too close to the edge of a slope so we thought we'd take a tour of some of those issues. You know water management. We'll probably pick another park to go to. There's a couple other ideas but if you have things that you would like to look at, let me know but what I need your help on is scheduling a date. We usually go that second week in September because we will have items for the September 2' meeting so it would be September 91 or September 10th which is a Tuesday or Wednesday. I know Wednesday is the normal meeting of the Environmental Commission so I haven't heard from Park and Rec what's a good meeting for them but if you want to let me know what dates works better or I can have, send you out a poll and does it matter to anybody either Tuesday or Wednesday? Okay. We'll kind of do the same thing. Chanhassen Planning Commission — July 15, 2014 Aller: I would recommend, just listening to if they're going to meet already and that's their regular meeting date. Aanenson: Wednesday? Aller: Attendance for them at least is almost a guarantee. Aanenson: Okay. Aller: And then if it works for everybody else then great. Aanenson: Yeah. Okay, that sounds good. Aller: And I would just ask if we ever have a meeting that's on our calendar that we do it on a Tuesday when it's our tum. Aanenson: Follow that site, okay. That sounds good. Yeah. So you'll actually have kind of three things in a row there. We do anticipate a couple of bigger commercial projects potentially coming in so, so with that I think. I was going to try to get a group picture but we're missing one person so that's on my agenda too to get an updated Planning Commission picture for the City's website. But that's all I had for administrative Chairman Aller so if anybody else has anything. I'm going to send out a reminder again regarding the stormwater educational thing on Lake Minnetonka. Aller: Yep. Aanenson: Okay, if anybody's interested in that. Are you going to try to go? Yusuf: I can't. Aanenson: Okay. I know Steve and Andrew are going so I'll sign them up so. Hokkanen: I'd like to but I can't. Aanenson: And that's all I had. Aller: Anyone want to make a motion to adjourn? Tennyson moved, Hokkanen seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the side yard setback variance request and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting a Variance to the side yard setback to construct a garage. LOCATION: 6780 Yuma Drive (PID 25-1601190) APPLICANT: Crosstown Builders, Inc. 4428 Colfax Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55345 (612) 270-3796 mike@crosstownbuilders.com • Daniel & Susan Degolier 6780 Yuma Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 PRESENT ZONING: Single Family Residential (RSF). 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (Net density 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: 0.37 acres DENSITY: NA LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION- MAIUNG: The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a 7.27 -foot setback variance to locate a detached garage 2.73 feet from the side property line. SCANNED 0 Planning Commission 6780 Yuma Drive Variance — Planning Case 2014-19 July 15, 2014 Page 2 of 4 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article 11, Division 3, Variances Chapter 20, Article XII, "RSF" Single -Family Residential District Section 20-904, Accessory Structures Is The RSF district requires a 10 -foot side yard setback. The applicant is requesting a 2.73 -foot side yard setback to construct a detached three -car garage. The house currently has an attached, tuck under garage, which the owners would like to convert into living space. ANALYSIS The applicant is proposing a 36 -foot by 24 -foot, three -car detached garage to be constructed 2.73 feet from the side property line. While the property is oddly shaped, the lot area exceeds the minimum requirement for a RSF-zoned lot with 16,333 square feet of area. There is adequate buildable area on the property to construct improvements within the required building setbacks. Using the same footprint proposed by the applicant, the garage can be shifted approximately 25 feet to the northwest and would maintain the required building setbacks. Additionally, this location would reduce the slope of the driveway from the street to the garage. The property to the west has an existing garage adjacent to the common property line. Permitting another garage adjacent to the property line would only add to the crowding of structures in this location. The applicant has provided a lot survey showing the proposed garage placement as well as an existing tree on site. The tree shown is a significant double -stem red oak in good condition. According to the survey, the proposed foundation of the garage will be located 10 feet from the base of the tree and grading will take place within 5 feet of the trunk. One of the stems of the tree has a lean that will be over the proposed garage location. Red oaks can tolerate minor root severance, but are sensitive to grading and compaction. The location of this tree makes it a difficult proposition to confidently preserve. If the proper strategies for protection are not employed, then it is a foregone conclusion that this tree will succumb to construction damage. Even if best management practices for protection are employed, there is still a significant risk that the impact will be too great to survive. Ideally, the garage would be located farther away from the tree in order to protect a greater portion of the root system. n U Planning Commission 6780 Yuma Drive Variance — Planning Case 2014-19 July 15, 2014 Page 3 of 4 0 Ii ® Staffs Recommendation ❑ Applicants Request ❑ Existing Structure � Buildable Area As seen below, Carver Beach is a unique area of the community and has many nonconforming lots and structures. Being that the Carver Beach development was platted in 1927, many of the lots are substandard and do not meet the lot requirements of the City Code. Subsequently, there are several properties with variances throughout the development. Within 500 feet of the subject property, staff noted 11 variance requests. However, none were for a side yard setback variance. Variance Address Description Action Number 83-5 6721 Hopi Dr An 8 foot front yard setback request for the Approved construction of a garage and solarium 85-5 895 Carver Beach A 17 foot rear yard variance to construct a single Approved Rd family residence A 12.7 foot front yard setback variance and a 6.9 85-8 6800 Ringo Dr foot rear yard setback variance for the Approved construction of a single family residence 86-4 6830 Yuma Dr Addition of home on nonconforming lot (9,501 Denied sq. Lot area variance for the construction of a single 87-9 6830 Yuma Dr family residence. Condition that the single Approved family residence must meet required setbacks Lot area and lot depth variance requests to 90-1 800 Carver Beach construct a single family home, lots 1083-89 Approved Rd Carver Beach 0 Planning Commission 6780 Yuma Drive Variance — Planning Case 2014-19 July 15, 2014 Page 4of4 I* Variance Address Description Action Number 8.5 front yard setback variance construction of a porch 974 6735 Nez Perce Dr NOTE: The city has subsequently amended the Approved ordinance to permit the construction ofporches within the required front yard setback on older homes 00-3 6712 Hopi Rd 16.5 ft rear yard setback variance for garage Approved expansion 6 -foot front yard setback and 8.33% hard surface 03-2 767 Carver Beach coverage variances for the construction of a Approved Rd single-family home 15 -foot rear yard setback variance from the 30- 08-20 800 Carver Beach foot rear yard setback for the construction of a Approved Rd dining room addition and deck 12 -foot front yard setback from the west property line (Yuma Drive) and a 21 -foot front yard 11-10 6829 Yuma Drive setback from the east property line (Ringo Drive) Approved for the construction of a single-family home on a non -conforming lot Should the variance be approved, the applicant should be aware a Building Permit is required. The structure must comply with Minnesota State Building Code. Applicant and owner to be advised, any portion of the structure within five (5) feet of a property line must be of one-hour fire -rated construction. Alternately, the Board of Appeals and Adjustment may grant a 7.5 -foot front yard setback variance which would maintain the approximate relative location of the garage to the home and preserve the separation of the structure to the property to the west, and revise the Findings of Fact accordingly. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the variance application and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Decision. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Reduced copy Land Survey. 4. Garage Plan 5. Affidavit of Mailing. gAplan\2014 planning cases\2014-19 6780 yuma varianee\statr report 6780 yuma.doc 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION IN RE: Application of Crosstown Builders, hic. and Daniel & Susan Degolier for a variance from the setback requirements to allow for a detached accessory structure 2.73 feet from the side property line on property zoned Single -Family Residential District (RSF) — Planning Case 2014-19. On July 15, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential District (RSF). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is as follows: Lots 1391 —1400, Carver Beach, Carver County, Minnesota 4. Variance Findin¢s — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The subject site is zoned Single -Family Residential District. The purpose of the request is to permit a 2.73 -foot side yard setback to allow a detached three -car garage. While the neighboring property has a garage adjacent to the property line, permitting additional encroachment into the setback would only crowd the property line. The applicant can construct this garage and meet the required setback. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 0 E Finding: The applicant can construct the detached garage and meet the setback requirements by shifting the building approximately 25 feet to the north. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The stated intent of the request is for a detached three -car garage. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The property has adequate building area to permit the construction of a three - car garage which complies with the setback requirements. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The granting of the variance would exacerbate the close conditions of structures to the property line in this area. The garage can be constructed within the existing building setback requirement. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2014-19, dated July 15, 2014, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. "The Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustment, denies Planning Case #2014-19 a 7.27 -foot setback variance from the 10 -foot side yard setback requirement to allow a three -car detached garage on property zoned Single -Family Residential District." ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15th day of July, 2014 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Chairman 2 OFCHANHAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DESTMENT CITY RECEIVED SEN • Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CII NSEN Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317JUN .I � 2O1 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 CHANHAM PLANNING DEPT APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 7 12-b C6 (it Date Filed: — 13— I`t' WDay Review Deadline: Planner: _ S% Case #:4 (:4� �j Section•• • ••apply) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment $600 ❑ Subdivision us per dwelling unit X30 _ (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for requited submittal •I Z 2 eo information that must accompany this application) kDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES: Notification Sign...............................................TOTAL FEES: $_rir]?�P= (City to install and remove) Property Owners' List within 500'......... $3 per ad a Received from rn 31LA l r (City to generate – fee determined at pre- lira 'on meeting) Escrow for Recording Documents . 50 er document Date Received: (.— Ilk -14 Check Number:( 64 11 (CUP/SPRNACNARANAP/Metes & B s Subdivision) Project Name: (0 786 YLLMC. _D6\k0 V�riQT`� P Property Address or Location: .4-2,4762 �1�,4 DP C,*,' 5 45StN MAI S s?l ti Parcel #,c25 -1(x01190 Legal Description: 11 Total Acreage: 16,3n SI+F�etlands Present? R Present Zoning: S I pp Present Land Use Designation: 71� Existing Use of Property Description of Proposal: I—I40o ❑ Yes R'Ko Requested Zoning: Requested Land Use Designation: ❑ Check box if separate narrative is attached ❑ ........................ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ...... $100 ❑ Create 3 lots or less........................................$300 ❑ Create over 3 lots ...................... $600 + $15 per lot ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds ........................ $300 + $50 per lot ❑ Single -Family Residence.................................$325 ❑ Consolidate Lots .............................................. $150 ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ......................................... $150 ❑ Final Plat' ........................................................$250 ❑ Interim Use Permit 'Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs. ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence..$325 Escrow will be required for other applications through the ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 development contract. El Rezoning 9 El Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way...................$300 ❑ Planned (Additional recording fees may apply) 2�G Unit Development (PUD)...................$750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................$100 [JJ Variance ........................................................... ❑ All Others .........................................................$500 ...$200 __5 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit 1213 ❑ Sign Plan Review...................................................$150 ❑ Single -Family Residence ............................... $150 ElAll Others .......................................................$275 El Site Plan Review ❑ Administrative ..................................................$100 ❑ Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts* ......................$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment............................$500 employees: and number of new employees: andn*Include number of employees: NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, El Residential Districts.........................................$500 thea ro riate fee shall be charged for each application. PP P rg PI $5 us per dwelling unit X30 _ (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for requited submittal •I Z 2 eo information that must accompany this application) kDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES: Notification Sign...............................................TOTAL FEES: $_rir]?�P= (City to install and remove) Property Owners' List within 500'......... $3 per ad a Received from rn 31LA l r (City to generate – fee determined at pre- lira 'on meeting) Escrow for Recording Documents . 50 er document Date Received: (.— Ilk -14 Check Number:( 64 11 (CUP/SPRNACNARANAP/Metes & B s Subdivision) Project Name: (0 786 YLLMC. _D6\k0 V�riQT`� P Property Address or Location: .4-2,4762 �1�,4 DP C,*,' 5 45StN MAI S s?l ti Parcel #,c25 -1(x01190 Legal Description: 11 Total Acreage: 16,3n SI+F�etlands Present? R Present Zoning: S I pp Present Land Use Designation: 71� Existing Use of Property Description of Proposal: I—I40o ❑ Yes R'Ko Requested Zoning: Requested Land Use Designation: ❑ Check box if separate narrative is attached APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Ml&,, A&Mrr5 1,W Contact: Mllee Address: Phone: . City/State/Zip: Cell: 6IZ e-' 7U 379 Fax: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: t%!+ Bridej/G A'L S Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell'1 2Z 267 Email: Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: Owner Via: ❑ mail ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: kProperty Applicant Via: [ff Email ElMMailed Paper Copy Address: Engineer Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other* Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name:l�Lt�P— AY,01Zr,5 14C Contact: N/!/CB Address: City/State/ZiD: Email: Signat Phone: Cell: 6l2 Z 7� 37y� Fax: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Address: Contact: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: _ Fax: Signature: _ Date: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: l%~ 40,1dCiL gl_ S Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell 2 72 207 Email: Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: ❑ Property Owner Via:❑� �mail E] Mailed Paper Copy Name: Applicant Via: [7Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑ Engineer Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: 0 Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: -Dek h b t Go V -'d r . S L& V- e l,o ; t r Contact: Address: Address: (o7$'O X u`„ w t)r p lonu (03- `60-7 City/State/Zip: CLt Cil: `]L 3— ky:7— R Sng. Email: SDaD�EC>OLT > R MS ,Co Fax: Signature: _yJ gN. ��r �,s Date: 9.b CJ K^ i olr{ This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the speck ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Email: Contact: Phone: Cell: Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: ❑ Property Owner Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑ Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: _ ❑ Engineer Via: E) Email E] Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: Features; Existing Elevations Proposed Garage Features; Proposed Elevations 14 i � 1 � N � � f -a.1 �'- saw' a } LAND SURVEY -PROPOSED GARAGE w �; �a r Property Boundaries; Current t ddd, Features; Existing Elevations Proposed Garage Features; Proposed Elevations t s 9-M R h ax mans •aarm �qtX y,S FLX PL I 31 'I I S 9 v F ^I I� L r I 53551W1dCOtl 03tl 33NKN3 I I I tl I bl A I le I F � I mans FLX as _. 0 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on July 3, 2014, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for the 6780 Yuma Drive Variance Request — Planning Case 2014-19 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me thiaa day of .12014. Ao'. 77F. Notary Pub is d�y,•��EK ME INISJ;�EN Publ'c-= =W,: E*D�� Ja Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Variance to the side yard setback to construct a Proposal: garage on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF). Applicant: Crosstown Builders, Inc. Property 6780 Yuma Drive Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens W Wthe 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-19. If you wish to talk to www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-19. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at bgenerous(cDci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at email at baenerous(cDci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse. affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any Interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be Included In the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of theagenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for a Variance to the side yard setback to construct a Proposal: garage on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF). Applicant: Crosstown Builders, Inc. Property 6780 Yuma Drive Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. at the Meeting: 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-19. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by email at baenerous(cDci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Questions & 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is Comments: helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Intedm Uses, Wetland Alteratl Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any Interested party is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/Industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included In the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. 0 ANDREW A BORASH 6725 NEZ PERCE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9206 BRUCE D KOEHNEN 5810 DIVISION ST EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-3202 DANIEL S & SUSAN L DEGOLIER 6780 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9541 DOUGLAS A & MARTHA M WALL 800 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9432 ELAINE C OTTERDAHL 6715 NEZ PERCE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9206 JACOB D & ELIZABETH G WOESE 777 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9422 JENNIFER D MAATMAN 895 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9420 KENNETH JEROME LUCAS 6735 NEZ PERCE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9207 LARRY L & MARY E BARRETT 6741 HOPI RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9427 of BERCH HOLDINGS LLC 261 SCHOOL AVE # 240 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-1932 CHRISTIAN SVENSGAARD 795 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9422 DENNIS D KRUMSIEG 760 CREE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9464 DOUGLAS H & CORAZON KALLEVIG 14021 VICTORIA LN NW ELK RIVER, MN 55330-8314 FRANKLIN D ERNST 840 CREE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9599 JEFFERY A KING 767 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9422 BRUCE & CHARLENE BURRINGTON 6869 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9554 CONNIE PAIGE SACKETT 820 IMPERIAL DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9418 DONALD E WHITACRE 751 CENTURY AVE S ST PAUL, MN 55119-5814 DWIGHT E IMKER 810 PONDEROSA DR # B CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9562 GREGORY J CARLSON 760 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9422 JEFFREY D BENELLI 6710 HOPI RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9427 JONATHAN H & MARGARET ORTNER JOSEPH M & LORI L HARRINGTON 6865 NEZ PERCE DR 901 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9209 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8572 KEVIN MCGINTY 820 IMPERIAL ST CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9418 LEE J & DEBORAH R PILLATZKI 830 PONDEROSA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9562 KIRSTEN ANNE PAULY 751 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9422 MARIE A LAMERE 6859 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9554 MARTIN P & AMY E JENSEN MICHAEL A & ROBBIE WOITALLA MICHAEL F & BARBARA A COYLE 770 CREE DR 6712 HOPI RD 757 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9464 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9427 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9422 i 0 MIKE BUENTING ROBERT A W IEST 6800 RINGO DR 840 CARVER BEACH RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9558 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9432 ROBERT JOHN MOORE RONALD M & DIANE M 6839 YUMA DR STANCHFIELD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9554 6727 HOPI RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9427 STACY L ENGER STEVEN J & JOAN M CRONSON 790 CARVER BEACH RD 801 CREE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9422 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9599 THOMAS L & JUDITH L RAYMOND THOMAS OPITZ 834 CREE DR PO BOX 872 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9599 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0872 ROBERT C MACFARLANE 6850 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9554 RUTH E LUNDE 6721 HOPI RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9427 TERRANCE & ELIZABETH MATTESON 833 CREE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9599 TRICIA L NOWLING 6829 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9541 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 201419 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 15, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for a Variance to the side yard setback to construct a garage on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 6780 Yuma Drive. Applicant: Crosstown Builders, Inc. Owner. Daniel & Susan Degolier. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at wwwci.chanbassen. mn.us/2014-19 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinigps with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, AICP, Senior Planner Email: bgenerous@ ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, July 3, 2014: No. 4972) Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No. was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice d sai Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghi)khnnopgrstu //,{� Y; „" �v� 'e A. Hartmann Subscribed and sworn before me on JYMME JEANNETT E BARK STAWr SU-WN4W.A MY CUMSSION MRSS 01131Y a RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ................................ $31.20 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter..............................................$12.59 per column inch SCANNED 0 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2014-19 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 15, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for a Variance to the side yard setback to construct a garage on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 6780 Yuma Drive. Applicant: Crosstown Builders, Inc. Owner: Daniel & Susan Degolier. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-19 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Robert Generous, AICP, Senior Planner Email: beenemw(@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1131 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on July 3, 2014) ku" 'ED Date: June 24, 2014 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department P Review Response Deadline: July 3.2014 By: Robert Generous, AICP, Senior Planner Subject: Request for a Variance to the side yard setback to construct a garage on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 6780 Yuma Drive. Applicant: Crosstown Builders, Inc. Owner: Daniel & Susan Degolier. Planning Case: 2014-19 PID: 25-1601190 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on June 13, 2014. The 60 -day review period ends August 12, 2014. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and Proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on July 15, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than July 3, 2014. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint/United) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco SCANNED Property Card Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name DANIEL S & SUSAN L DEGOLIER Mailing Address 6780 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9541 Property Address Address 6780 YUMA DR City CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 Uses Tax Description Building Style Year Built 1] Parcel ID Number 251601190 Parcel Information Res 1 unit GIS Acres 0.37 Tax Acres Plat CARVER BEACH Lot Block LOTS 1391 - 1400 SPLIT ENTRY 1972 Building Information Finished Sq Ft 1170 Bedrooms Other Garage Y Miscellaneous Information Bathrooms 3 1.50 School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve 0276 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF Y N N CREEK Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale (Payable 2014) (Payable 2015) Land $77,400.00 $83,300.00 Date of Sale 10/01/2004 Building $138,700.00 $154,600.00 Sale Value $240,000.00 Total $216,100.00 $237,900.00 Qualified/ Q Unqualified Disclaimer. This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Carver County does not guarantee accuracy of the material contained herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims. and agrees to defend. indemnifyand hold harmless the County from any and all claims brought by User, CARVER its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the users access or use of data pmvitled. COUNTY Tuesday, June 17, 2014 Carver County, MN Page 1 of 1 SCANNED Y n u Property Card Taxpayer Information Taxpayer Name DANIEL S & SUSAN L DEGOLIER Mailing Address 6780 YUMA DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9541 Property Address Address 6780 YUMA DR City CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 0 Parcel ID Number 251601190 Parcel Information Uses Res 1 unit GIS Acres 0.37 Tax Acres Plat CARVER BEACH Lot Block Tax Description LOTS 1391 - 1400 Building Information Building Style SPLIT ENTRY Finished Sy Ft 1170 Bedrooms 3 Year Built 1972 Other Garage Y Bathrooms 1.50 Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve 0276 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF Y N N CREEK Assessor information Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale (Payable 2014) (Payable 2015) Land $77,400.00 $83,300.00 Date of Sale 10/01/2004 Building $138,700.00 $154,600.00 Sale Value $240,000.00 Total $216,100.00 $237,900.00 Qualified/ Q Unqualified Disclaimer. 'bs icforrratioa is to be used for reference purposes any Carver County roes not guarantee accuracy of the materia contained herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages, and Will expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend indemnify. and hold harmless the County from any and all claims brought by User. CARVER its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the users access or use of data provided. COUNTY Tuesday, June 17, 2014 Carver County, MN Page 1 of 1 S, OFCHANHASS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATMENT CITYRECEIVED EN . Planning Division — 7700 Market Boulevard CITY OF CHANNSEN Mailing Address — P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317JUN 13 20 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 CHANHASSB PLANNING DEPT -7 /IS 1_>6 APPLICATION FOR DEILVELOPMENrT�REVIEW Z11_S CL (It neceS5 Date Filed: L -- j - I�t- 60 -Day Review Deadline: i, - la.- IT Planner: )a, Case #:, C tY'f 7 Section•• • •apply) ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment .........................$600 ❑ Subdivision ❑ ❑ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ...... $100 ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Metes & Bounds ........................ ❑ Single -Family Residence.................................$325 Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ All Others .......................................................$275 ❑ In conjunction with Single -Family Residence..$325 Escrow will be required for other applications through the ❑ All Others .........................................................$425 ❑ Rezoning ❑ Planned Unit Development (PUD)...................$750 ❑ Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................$100 ❑ All Others .........................................................$500 ❑ Sign Plan Review...................................................$150 ❑ Site Plan Review ❑ Administrative ..................................................$100 ❑ Commercial/Industrial Districts' ......................$500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area Include number of existing employees: and number of new employees: ❑ Residential Districts.........................................$500 ❑ Create 3 lots or less.........................................$300 �� COD ❑ Create over 3 lots ...................... $600 + $15 per lot ❑ Metes & Bounds ........................ $300 + $50 per lot ❑ Consolidate Lots..............................................$150 ❑ ❑ Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150 ❑ Final Plat' ........................................................$250 ❑ All Others .......................................................$275 'Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs. ❑ Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. ❑ Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way...................$300 �� COD (Additional recording fees may apply) $3 per ac1fa3 j (City to generate - fee determined at pr lication meeting) Escrow for Recording Documents . 50 er document zct p [2(Variance........................................................... .- $200 ❑ Wetland Alteration Permit 12'3 ❑ Single -Family Residence...............................$150 ❑ All Others .......................................................$275 ❑ Zoning Appeal ......................................................$100 ❑ Zoning Ordinance Amendment............................$500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. Plus $5 per dwellingunit L 1 I X c14 J6 � (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal l jU , may' 2 3 r information that must accompany this application) �DITIONAL REQUIRED FEES: Notification Sign ................................................. �� COD (City to install and remove) Property Owners' List within 500'......... $3 per ac1fa3 j (City to generate - fee determined at pr lication meeting) Escrow for Recording Documents . 50 er document (CUP/SPRNACNAIRWAP/Metes & B s Subdivision) TOTAL FEES: snj?,�= Received fromf ` rn«�— tai u1Clet Date Received: t,— V1,-14 Check Number: 164 3, 1 I Section 2: Required Information `' Project Name: Q51Eb)) ILLI^(\&, _D6yC rt�7r�� Property Address or Location: Parcel #_25 - I 4Q 1190 Legal Description: U� Total Acreage: /6f 3i SG) F-"Vetlands Present? Present Zoning: R S F pp Present Land Use Designation: Tl LID Existing Use of Property: -,9;TX1iee �Lr. Description of Proposal: ❑ Check box if separate narrative is attached As t3g1-11400 ❑ Yes [3-�o Requested Zoning: Requested Land Use Designation: APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: >Yl MC*5 arils erZZ-70ww c4cGii$ 141e Contact: 1011C'e Address: Phone: Citv/State/ZiD: Email: Signal Cell: 6/� 70 379 Fax: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name Address: City/State/Zip: Email: Signature: Contact Phone: Cell: Fax: Date: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the speck ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: C%a Cell: 2-7Z 2 Email: Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? 'Other Contact Information: ❑ Property Owner Via:❑� mail El Mailed Paper Copy Name: Applicant Via: [3Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: Engineer Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other' Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: SCANNED 0 0 PropertySection 3: Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify thatthe information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: J)o K ) e (o e) .0 r . S k10- b � lqa ' r - r Contact: Address: (o7$'O b p&&7 3— 16-2 $4GFa City/State/Zip: Che &6 a Mn 5531? Ca -"e- ]f, 3— R'0:7— Unr Email: SPI) FGOLT ER W r5 Cor Fax: Signature: atu. Date: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: ❑ Property Owner Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Name: ❑ Applicant Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Address: ❑ Engineer Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: ❑ Other` Via: ❑ Email ❑ Mailed Paper Copy Email: SCANNED r 6780 YUMA DRIVE VARIANCE REQUEST - PLANNING CASE 2014-19 $200.00 Variance $200.00 Notification Sign $123.00 Property Owners List $50.00 Escrow for filing fees (Variance) $573.00 TOTAL $573.00 Less Check 13421 from Crosstown Builders $0.00 BALANCE REMAINING TO BE PAID CITY OF CHANHASSEN • P O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 06/17/2014 9:29 AM Receipt No. 00254474 CLERK: AshleyM PAYEE: Crosstown Builders 4428 Colfax Ave south Minneapolis MN 55419- 6780 Yuma Drive Variance Request Planning Case 2014-19 ------------------------------------------------------- Variance 200.00 Notification Sign 200.00 Escrow for filing fees 50.00 GIS List 123.00 Total Cash Check 13421 Change 573.00 0.00 573.00 0.00 W-o"V 6