CAS-20_3880 LONE CEDAR LANE 25-1700070Thomas]. Campbell
Roger N. Knutson
Thomas M. Scott
Elliott B. Knctsch
Joel J. Jamnik
Andrea McDowell Poehler
Soren M. Mattick
John F. Kelly
Henry A. Schaeffer, III
Alina Schwartz
Shana N. Conklin
David H. Schultz
1380 Corporate Center Come
Suite 317 - Eagan, MN 55121
651-452-5000
Fax 651-452-5550
www.ck-12w.com
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
CnoFCHANEH1ASSEI`,
RECEIV D
OCT 2 11 2014
CHAWASSEN PLANNING DFP7
October 16,2014
Ms. Kim Meuwissen
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317
Re: Chanhassen — Miscellaneous Recording
Dear Kim:
Pursuant to your request, enclosed herewith for your file are the following
original, recorded documents:
Variance 2014-20, recorded September 2, 2014, as Document No.
A598766; and
2. Conditional Use Permit #2006-24 (ABRA Auto Body and Glass),
recorded September 2, 2014, as Document No. A598778.
If you have any questions regarding the above, please give me a call.
cjh
Enclosure
175692vl
Very truly yours,
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
By -
�C e J. Hoeft
g I si
al As stant
SCANNEC
.1 -4
i I .
Doctiment No. OFFICE OF THE
A598766 COUNTY RECORDER
CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Receipt #
Certified Recorded on September 02, 2014 1:30 I'M
Fee: $46.00
Mark Lundgren
County Recorder
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNFSOTA
VARIANCE 2014-20
1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen
hereby grants the following variance:
The Chanhassen Planning Commission approves Planning Case #2014-20
for a 13 -foot bluff setback variance to permit the construction of a water -
oriented structure on a property zoned Single -Family Residential District.
2. Prope . The variance is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver
County, Minnesota, and legally described as follows:
Lot 7, Block 1, Cedar Crest Addition
3. Condition. The variance approval is subject to the following conditions:
a. The builder shall mitigate any potential drainage issues.
b. The builder shall apply for a building permit and meet all requirements of said
permit.
4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed
construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse.
Dated: August 27, 2014
SCANNED
T�
(SEAL)
STATE OF MINNESOTA
(ss
COUNTY OF CARVER
CITY OF CHANRASSEN
BY:
Thomas A. Furlong,
AND: J, I
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thi997hd%f A
2014 by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of c citnf Ch assen'
a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted
by its City Council.
4EK T. E!,�IS.SEN
=taZ 41 M r
Y= e. � ev .4 31. 2015
DRAFTED BY:
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952) 227-1100
2
F�" I - -- /\ ' I e
W Itt- � F — 0 a I � -ZI-11-4, 4�0 L-1
-j NOTARYCUBLIC
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7700 Market Boulevard
P.O. Box 147
CHANHASSEN, MIN 55317
(952) 227-1100 FAX (952) 227-1110
TO: Campbell Knutson, PA
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, MN 55121
WE ARE SENDING YOU
El Shop drawings
El Copy of letter
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
DATE JOB NO.
8/27/14 12014-20
ATTENTION
Carole Hoeft
RE:
Document Recording
0 Attached El Under separate cover via the following items:
El Prints El Plans EI Samples El Specifications
El Change Order [I Pay Request E] —
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
1
8/27/14
14-20
Variance 2614-20 (3880 Lone Cedar Lane - Lo -t 7, Block 1, Cedar
Crest (Cha ) Addition)
[:1
FORBIDS DUE
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
0
For approval
E3
For your use
El
As requested
El
For review and comment
[:1
FORBIDS DUE
REMARKS
COPY TO: Scott T. Murphy
El Approved as submitted
El Approved as noted
El Returned for corrections
E For Recording
[-] Resubmit copies for approval
E] Submit copies for distribution
El Return corrected Prints
F-1 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
SIGNEDsz�:;; A.A I -A-'Q��
Iim ffe—uwiss = 1107
If enclosures am not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
=i 4 1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
VARIANCE 2014-20
1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen
hereby grants the followmg variance:
The Chanhassen Planning Commission approves Planning Case #2014-20
for a 13 -foot bluff setback variance to permit the construction of a water -
oriented structure on a property zoned Single -Family Residential District.
2. Prope . The variance is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver
County, Minnesota, and legally described as follows:
Lot 7, Block 1, Cedar Crest (Chan) Addition
3. Condition. The variance approval is subject to the fbHowing conditions:
a. The builder shall mitigate any potential drainage issues.
b. The builder shall apply for a building permit and meet all requirements of said
permit.
4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed
construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse.
Dated: August 27,2014
05MOA�*
A%
I
(SEAL)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
(ss
COUNTY OF CARVER
CITY OF CHANRASSEN
BY:
Thomas A. Furlong,
AND: z( .-�
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this�dday of '
L
2014 by Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the Ci#f �Chassen:
a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted
by its City Council.
J#KIM T. MWISSEN
ow
Notafy Public -Minnesota
kisWon Fj -1-Mi:9— 015
W —
MY Conwry pr! 381.2
my I
DRAFTED BY:
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952) 227-1100
I
EN , MA
Administration Dear Mr. Murphy:
Phone: 952.227,1100
Fax: 952.227.1110 This letter is to confirm that on August 19, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning
Building Inspections Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustment approved Planning
Phone: 952.227.1180 Case #2014-20 for a 13 -foot bluff setback variance from the toe of a bluff to
Fax: 952.227.1190 construct a water -oriented structure on a property zoned Single -Family
Residential District.
Engineering
Phone: 952.227.1160
Fax: 952.227.1170 You will need to fill out a hardcover calculation worksheet as a part of your
building permit application (both enclosed). A variance shall become void within
Finance one year unless substantial action has been taken by the petitioner in reliance
Phone: 952.227.1140 thereof
Fax: 952.227.1110
Park & Recreation If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at
Phone: 952.227.1120 (952) 227-1132 or by email dingvalson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us.
Fax:952.2271110
Sincerely,
Recreation Center
2310 Coultet Boulevard
Phone: 952.227.1400
Fax: 952.2271404 z6v
Planning & Drew Ingvalson
Natural Resources Planning Intern
Phone: 952.227.1130
Fax:952.227.1110 c: Building Permit File
Public Worlm ec: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
7901 Park Place Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
Phone: 952.227.1300
Fax: 952.227.1310 Jerry Mohn, Building Official
Senior Center g:\plan\2014 planning cases\2014-20 3880 lone cedar lane variane6approval letter.doc
Phone: 952.227.1125
Fax: 952.227.1110
Web Site
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing forToday and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED
August 27, 2014
Uff OF
Scoff T. Murphy
MMSEN
3880 Lone Cedar Lane
Chaska, MN 55318
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Re: Planning Case #2014-20
Bluff Setback Variance for a Water -Oriented Structure
Administration Dear Mr. Murphy:
Phone: 952.227,1100
Fax: 952.227.1110 This letter is to confirm that on August 19, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning
Building Inspections Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustment approved Planning
Phone: 952.227.1180 Case #2014-20 for a 13 -foot bluff setback variance from the toe of a bluff to
Fax: 952.227.1190 construct a water -oriented structure on a property zoned Single -Family
Residential District.
Engineering
Phone: 952.227.1160
Fax: 952.227.1170 You will need to fill out a hardcover calculation worksheet as a part of your
building permit application (both enclosed). A variance shall become void within
Finance one year unless substantial action has been taken by the petitioner in reliance
Phone: 952.227.1140 thereof
Fax: 952.227.1110
Park & Recreation If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at
Phone: 952.227.1120 (952) 227-1132 or by email dingvalson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us.
Fax:952.2271110
Sincerely,
Recreation Center
2310 Coultet Boulevard
Phone: 952.227.1400
Fax: 952.2271404 z6v
Planning & Drew Ingvalson
Natural Resources Planning Intern
Phone: 952.227.1130
Fax:952.227.1110 c: Building Permit File
Public Worlm ec: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
7901 Park Place Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
Phone: 952.227.1300
Fax: 952.227.1310 Jerry Mohn, Building Official
Senior Center g:\plan\2014 planning cases\2014-20 3880 lone cedar lane variane6approval letter.doc
Phone: 952.227.1125
Fax: 952.227.1110
Web Site
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing forToday and Planning for Tomorrow SCANNED
I A Chanhassen Planning Commission — August 19, 2014 14 - C�-C)
City Forest
1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to replace the majority of the deciduous shrubs
with evergreen varieties.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0.
PUBLIC HEARING:
3880 LONE CEDAR LANE: REOUEST FOR VARL&NCE TO THE BLUFF SETBACK
TO CONSTRUCT A WATER -ORIENTED STRUCTURE ON PROPERTY ZONED
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTLAL (RSF) AND LOCATED AT 3880 LONE CEDAR
LANE. APPLICANVOWNER: SCOTT MURPHY, PLANNING CASE 2014-20.
Aller: And for the record we've received an additional letter to add to our packets dated August
12, 2014 from Mr. William Humphries and that has been read by all the commissioners and will
become part of the packet.
Ingvalson: Good evening Chairman Aller and Planning Commission. My name is Drew
Ingvalson, since I don't have a name tag I'll introduce myself. My name is Drew Ingvalson. I'm
interning here at the City of Chanhassen. The itern before you, Planning Case 2014-20 is a bluff
setback variance request. The location is at 3880 Lone Cedar Lane. This is north of State
Highway 5, on the southwest side of Lake Minnewashta. The applicant is requesting a 13 foot
bluff setback variance from the required 30 foot bluff setback to locate a water oriented structure
17 feet from the toe or the low side of the bluff. So if you look at the survey up there, there
currently is a shed existing on the property that will be removed with the, with locating a new
water oriented structure on the property. In green you can see a 20 foot sanitary sewer easement.
Permanent structures are not allowed within that easement. Also there is a red line on the left
side of that green 20 foot sanitary sewer easement. That shows the 30 foot bluff setback and
then in yellow is the yellow rectangle is the proposed water oriented structure location. The left
side would be within that bluff setback. The property owner is requesting a variance for this
location so that the water oriented structure can be permanent and is not in danger of being
removed in the future by the City. Within 500 feet of this property there have been three
variance requests. One of those requests was approved for a 10 foot bluff setback variance for a
retaining wall. So while it is reasonable to request a water oriented structure, it is possible for
this property to have one and also meet city code. Staff's recommendation is to locate a
temporary water oriented structure within the buildable area. You can see the location for that
would be the rectangle in blue and then the buildable area is the black diagonal lines within the
sanitary sewer easement. To locate something within that sanitary sewer easement it would
require an encroachment agreement with the City. This would City ordinance but would not
allow for the permanent structure and would possibly need to be removed by the City in the
future. So staff is recommending that the Board of Appeals and Adjustment denies the bluff
setback variance request and adopts the Findings of Fact and Decision. However should the
Planning Commission decide to approve the variance request, staff has provided an alternative
Findings of Fact and Decision. That is the end of the presentation and I'm open to any questions
that the Planning Commission has.
SCANNED
15
N
Chanhassen Planning Commission — August 19, 2014
Aller: Tliank you. Any questions at this point? Not yet? Okay. I guess I'll ask about the
previous variance for the retaining wall. What was the purpose of the retaining wall? Was it for
erosion or protection of water or?
Ingvalson: I don't have that written here. Apologize.
Aller: Okay. And then what do we envision a temporary structure looking like?
Ingvalson: It's going to be on 18 by 12 foot structure just to hold in different kayaks, canoes,
different water.
Aller: Would it be on wheels? Would it be on blocks?
Ingvalson: So if it is outside it will be a permanent structure. The proposed one will be outside
of that so it will be with a permanent structure there with footings. If it's located within the
sanitary sewer area it will be on skids.
Aller: So it would be on skids. And then what is the likelihood that we, if we have in the past,
that we've come in and actually asked someone to remove something or done work inside our
easement area for the sewer? Is that something, do we have planned maintenance coming up in
the next couple years? Did we look, I mean is it something we should be looking at?
Fauske: That's an excellent question. Every year the City does do televising of the sanitary
sewer system within the city. Since we have an extensive network we only cover a fraction of
the percentage of the sewer within the city. Typically we go and televise the sanitary sewer
within an area that we will be doing a street project. Those take priority to make sure that we're
maintaining the pipe underneath the streets that we are going to do some improvements on. So
we don't have, to my knowledge we don't have this one on the docket as far as getting any sewer
televising done in there. That being said in an emergency situation, which has happened in the
past where crews have had to go out and do an emergency fix, they do have equipment out there
that we would be able to move a structure within the easement and that's what the easement
allows us to do.
Aller: Additional questions at this time? Okay. We'll ask the applicant to step forward and
perhaps give us some insight as well. If you could state your name and address for the record
that would be great.
Scott Murphy: Good evening. My name is Scott Murphy. I live at 3880 Lone Cedar Lane. It's
Chaska, although I am actually a Chanhassen resident. It's in city limits there. Don't hold that
against me. I appreciate you hearing me tonight. I'm impressed with all this discussion for a
little back yard shed so I'm requesting a shed here. I'm just going to read off my notes real
quickly. To put a boathouse in the back yard here. I'm recognizing that we are going to incringe
on, or impinge upon the setback requirements of 15 feet from the lake and 30 feet from the bluff.
Normally I wouldn't have a problem with meeting that if it wasn't the fact that it was really
setting up in the sewer easement. For me that's really not an ideal scenario. If I'm going to
build a shed and 12 by 18 feet is a decent size, I'd prefer not to put that on skids. The fact is you
may or may not have seen some of the pictures that we sent but that's not a flat or level area
where you're putting it on. There's about a 2 or 3 foot drop over that, that 12 to 18 foot section
[Lot
k
U
I Chanhassen Planning Commission — August 19, 2014
you're putting it on so to put skids on that area and to probably expect it to maintain level access,
or a level base to it is I think probably unlikely with the way our weather and our conditions go
seasonally. My other concern here is also access into the shed. Now you've got to be able to get
in and out of this shed and presuming we put some sort of a garage door in, I'm entering in, if I
place it on that sloped area, in an unlevel surface so I've got to find some way to make that work
and also if I'm going to put it on wooden skids there I'm also going to probably have a much
shorter lifespan for a shed as far as versus putting it on a permanent concrete foundation and for
me the feasibility of putting the money and the time and the effort into making a shed that you
know 5 or 10 years from now I'm going to have to replace the floor or the lower areas, it's not
ideal. I certainly you as well as I can find better ways to spend your money than to replace your
shed every 10 or 12 years. Now the setback that I'm proposing here still doesn't impinge
directly upon, on the base. We're well, we're 17 feet away from the base. As the picture shows
I'm also not really removing any significant vegetation. It's already a mowed and grassy area
where I would be moving it to so we shouldn't have any further concerns regarding erosion or a
breakdown of the surface area as well. It's not really intrusive upon the environment. I
shouldn't be affecting local drainage. We also I know have hard cover concerns and we're well
below the total percentage of hard cover within the property as well including the shed area.
We're allowed a 250 square foot shed. This shed is only 216 square feet. Total hard cover
limitation for the property is 25%. Even with the addition of this shed we're only at 19.4% of
total coverage so we're well below the maximal area there. Any construction that we're going to
have occurring along the area should have minimal impingement because we already have a
paver pathway. You can kind of see from the picture that we have up there, all the way down
there so there shouldn't be any damage to the local environment for bringing of construction
materials down as well so I don't see any significant issues with that. In fact in speaking with
the builder he thinks that most of the shed will be pre -built and just hauled down in sections and
constructed pretty quickly. As far as the concrete base or foundation, we think we can get a
pumper truck in and run the tube right down and place the floating foundation so that should
have mimmal impingement on the environment as far as the construction as well. Construction
of the shed obviously we're allowed a water oriented structure and that does follow precedent for
what goes on with the lake. I have brought examples if you're interested of other sheds that are
both closer to the lake and built within the, in the base of the slope in multiple areas even right
next to our home and are shortly or a short distance away from it so there is precedent where this
sort of thing has been done in the past and I don't know if permits or variances were required or
permitted or if they were just built without previous notification but needless to say I guess I
don't think my request here is an unreasonable one and we wouldn't even be having this
discussion if it weren't for the sewer easement issue. We would have just put the shed up and
moved on our way but I'm hoping you can see if that's possible to, we can work around that.
Aller: So when you say, I'd love to take a look at the pictures. If you want to put them up, that's
fine. And then while you're doing that, did you have the opportunity to talk to the owners of the
properties where you took the pictures or got the pictures so we know, are these sheds in a sewer
easement or is it different?
Scott Murphy: These sheds are not in a sewer easement. I have pictures of them on each side.
This is the, show it here?
Aanenson: Yep.
17
1%
Chanhassen Planning Commission — August 19, 2014
Scott Murphy: So here's the proposed build site that we're looking at here. So if you look
closely you can see it's already a grassy area. Now if you were to slide about 12 to 13 feet
further down we'd be in that sloped area that's working it's way down to the lake. You're
obviously closer to the lake but we're on that sloped area and the sewer easement tends to run
right across this area right here. There's a manhole cover actually on the property over there and
then another manhole cover there and the sewer runs right parallel to that right underneath that so
I know exactly where they're talking about. I'm just talking about pushing it a little further up
here in an area that's already mowed. There is, I'm sure you've seen the picture, the foundation
of the shed is a very simple 12 by 18 structure.
Allen Did you talk about materials? Is it going to be a metal shed? Wood shed?
Scott Murphy: No, okay. There's pictures of it in there. It's going to, similar to the architecture
of the home. It's a shingled shed. Asphalt shingles and cedar shingle siding. I've got one more
picture. That would be the view from the lake side. What you would see. So there'd be a door,
window and a side door garage entrance. As far as similar sheds, this is a similar shed that's 2
houses to the south of us that's built into the base or bluff of the hill. This is a similar shed just
north of us. Our next door neighbor. Again built right into the bluff or the base of the hill as
well and if you go finther north about a half a dozen houses this is another boat house that's
about 5 houses up built closer to the lakeshore as well so there is precedence for sheds being
built closer to the lake as well as into the bluff base so what I'm asking is actually neither of
those. Not closer to the lake or actually into the bluff but into a buildable area that's out of the
sewer easement. Any questions?
Aller: Anything else? Additional questions? Thank you sir.
Scott Murphy: You're welcome. Thank you for hearing me tonight.
Aller: Okay we're going to open the public hearing portion of the meeting. Anyone wishing to
speak for or against this item can do so at this time. Seeing no one come forward, again I'll
close the public hearing and open it for comments. Discussion.
Campion: I'm curious if there's any more detail on what the detrimental effects on the natural
resources of it being in the proposed area. I saw a statement to that effect in the Findings of Fact
but not. Not any fixther explanation on what is that detrimental effect they're trying to avoid.
Aller: Do we have any information on that? Detrimental impacts on the water.
Fauske: Chairman Aller?
Aller: Yes.
Fauske: If I might provide some clarification for the Planning Commission. On page 3 of the
staff report it indicates on the front, the top paragraph that the reason for the bluff setback is to
protect the bluff from erosion due to removal of the tree canopy and vegetation, redirection of
surface drainage and increase of flow rates and volumes on the bluff.
Campion: But this shed would not remove any trees or canopy right?
V
A#
Chanhassen Planning Commission — August 19, 2014
Fauske: Yes, that's also noted in the second part of that paragraph. Regarding minimal
vegetation removal with regards to this proposal.
Campion: Okay.
Aller: Additional thoughts? Ithinkit's.
Yusuf.- Can I ask one question?
Aller: Absolutely.
Yusuf: A question for city staff. Are there any other options or any other variances that could
allow the applicant to build the shed that he's requesting given the precedent set by the
neighboring houses?
Ingvalson: No, if he was to have a permanent shed like he's proposing this is, there isn't any
other locations that would be any better than this one.
Yusuf.- Okay.
Aanenson: Let me answer that a little bit differently. I think one of the questions that, because
it's not impacting the bluff itself but there's still the setback from the bluff and then you could
look at, what are the unique characteristics of this property and the sewer line becomes a unique
characteristic so if you look at is there any unusual circumstances or hardship. We can't address
the other issues that were put on with the other boat houses. We don't have information that
those were, how those were permitted at the time that they were constructed but you can see
there's a lot of different iterations. That's why you know our first choice is try to preserve the
bluff but that's why we did give the additional Findings of Fact because there is some of the
unique characteristics of this property and that is implication of the, you don't want to build the
structure over the sewer line.
Aller: And there's no guarantee that next winter we don't have a major freeze and a break and
you have to tear out what's been put in.
Undestad: Kate how many, how wide is that sewer easement? I mean if he's got his house right
down to the edge of the sewer easement.
Aanenson: I'll let Alyson address that. Typically they like setbacks from the easement.
Fauske: I believe the sewer easement is 20 feet wide which is a standard sewer easement given a
standard depth of sewer to allow the crew adequate space to both get a safe trench, boxing it and
then area also for the equipment and the soil piles as well.
Undestad: So there's 20 feet of grass from where he wants to put his boat house?
19
Chanhassen Planning Commission —August 19, 2014
Fauske: As shown in the plan it looks like if he went right up to the proposed edge of the
easement, the sanitary sewer would be 10 feet from the edge of that. Of the proposed location to
where the actual sewer line is.
Aller: And that 10 feet would be from the buildable area as marked here with?
Fauske: Correct. It would be from the edge of the building to the sewer would be approximately
10 feet based on what I'm seeing in the staff report.
Undestad: And the bluff, setting back into the bluff and we want to control erosion from the
bluff. I mean where he's at right there down as low as he can get to the lake without being in the
easement area, I guess, I mean to me I'm kind of looking at you know and the way he's proposed
it, I mean he wants to do everything right to preserve everything down there but I don't know.
I'm kind of thinking it should go there rather than on the easement.
Yusuf. I agree.
Undestad: And move things around all the time.
Aller: So when we look at, when we look at variances though, if you can accomplish the task
without the need for a variance and you can put it on skids.
Undestad: Yeah. I don't think you'd get.
Aller: It's not a perfect resolution but it works.
Undestad: Right.
Hokkanen: The easement kind of creates as a hardship itself though because if you build it on
the, you know you could have to move it. I don't know.
Undestad: And it's not going to last.
Hokkanen: Right so 1, this one's unique.
Tennyson: Very.
Hokkanen: Because I think the applicant is proposing a good solution for the easement. For him
it's not really impacting the bluff. I mean its flat land. I guess I need a little clarification if he
was to put it where it's proposing what is the detrimental impact of the, to the bluff. To the
setback. I mean is there any findings? I didn't see anything in here that really.
Weick: Well it doesn't appear that it would.
Hokkanen: Right.
Weick: I mean if I read this it says it can be completed without increasing erosive conditions.
at,
Chanhassen Planning Commission — August 19, 2014
Hokkanen: Right.
Weick: I interrupt that to mean if it's built on the proposed site as a permanent structure there
would be very little.
Hokkanen: Inapact.
Weick: Impact to the bluff. If I'm reading that incorrectly I'd like to be corrected but 1, to me it
would be preferred to have a permanent structure on that graded, that grade of land right? That
flat land as opposed to a temporary structure on a hill. Just from, I just think it's a better option.
That would be my opinion. With little to no impact to the bluff which is our major concern.
Tennyson: Is that the concern though? I mean it meets practical difficulties.
Aanenson: Someone could just float a motion and you can see.
Tennyson: One direction or the other.
Aller: Any further discussion on it? Does anybody have any questions or? Everybody has a
vote in mind so I'll entertain a motion.
Undestad: Well I think they kind of gave us a just in case anyway.
Hokkanen: It's definitely unique.
Weick: I'll propose a motion.
Aller: Go ahead.
Yusuf-. Which one?
Weick: Motion to approve. The Chanhassen Planning Commission acting as the Board of
Appeals and Adjustments approves Planning Case #2014-20 for a 13 foot setback variance to
allow a water oriented structure on property zoned Single Family Residential District.
Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second?
Aanenson: Can I just get clarification on the motion Chairman? I'm assuming you also wanted
to add with conditions of Findings of Fact and Recommendation.
Weick: With the conditions of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.
Aanenson: Thank you.
Undestad: I'll second.
Aller: I have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? I guess one of my questions
would be to discuss this a little bit further is, is there a way to reduce the setback and make sure
21
Chanhassen Planning Commission —August 19, 2014
that we're really minimalizing it. If we're going to have a motion like this that we minimalize
the impact.
Weick: You mean with a smaller structure?
Aller: It could be a smaller structure. It could be the setback that goes to the very edge of the
bluff setback so it's only the minimal amount that is needed or is required to allow them to move
forward. And where would that line be?
Aanenson: Chairman I think we're pretty confident that's where we located it. I think if your
condition is going to, are there other things we can do to mitigate, drainage coming off the bluff.
I think that's something we can look at and make that, if that's one of your conditions that we
can work to see if we need to provide something there to, if there's runoff in that area. If it's
concentrated or something that we could look at something there. But we believe that that's the
spot.
Aller: That's the spot.
Aanenson: With least amount of impact, correct.
Aller: And our hardship is in reality this, the casement. Does anybody have any thoughts on
runoff or erosion created by the building or an accessory structure? Okay.
Tennyson: If you look at it it's meeting all of the requirements in the findings for the variance
then I'm not sure you have to look beyond that.
Aller: Alright, I have a motion and a second. All those in favor.
Weick moved, Undestad seconded the Chanhassen Planning Commission acting as the
Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance from the bluff setback
requirements to allow a 18 foot by 12 foot water oriented structure 17 feet from the toe of a
bluff on property zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF), Planning Case 2014-20
and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. All voted in favor, except
Chairman Aller who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 6 to 1.
PUBLIC HEARING:
960 CARVER BEACH ROAD: RIEOUEST FOR A VARUNCE TO EXCEED THE
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE LIMITATION TO CONSTRUCT A DRIVEWAY ON
PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTUL (RSF) AND LOCATED AT 960
CARVER BEACH ROAD. APPLICANVOWNER: CHRISTOPHER & BARBARA
KING, PLANNING CASE 2014-21.
Aanenson: Thank you Chairman Aller, members of the Planning Commission. This item, 960
Carver Beach Road, Planning Case 2014-2 1. The applicants are Christopher and Barbara King.
The location is Carver Beach and as I mentioned 960 off of Carver Beach Road. This item did
appear before the Planning Commission in, excuse me was approved in August 12, 2013. The
City Council approved a variance for hard cover of 5.8 percent to allow for a total hard cover of
22
CrIY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
IN RE:
)4-a'(D
Application of Scott T. Murphy for a variance from the bluff setback requirements to allow for a
18 -foot by 12 -foot water -oriented structure 17 feet from the toe of a bluff on property zoned Single -
Family Residential District (RSF) — Planning Case 2014-20.
On August 19, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and
Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning
Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and
mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential District (RSF).
2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density.
3. The legal description of the property is as follows:
Lot 7, Block 1, Cedar Crest (Chan), Carver County, Minnesota
4. Variance Findings — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the
granting of a variance:
a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive
plan.
Finding: The subject site is zoned Single -Family Residential District. The purpose of the
request is to permit a 17 -foot bluff setback to allow a water -oriented structure. The Bluff
Protection Ordinance is meant to protect natural resources. The 13 -foot encroachment
into the required bluff setback can be completed without increasing erosive conditions.
b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical
difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the
property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this
Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct
sunlight for solar energy systems.
SCANNED
Finding: The practical difficulty of complying with the bluff setback is due to a 20 -foot
wide sanitary sewer easement located near the shoreline. The property owner is
proposing a permanent water -oriented structure, which are not allowed within sanitary
sewer easements. There are not any other locations near the shoreline that are available
for the property owner to locate a permanent water -oriented structure.
c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone.
Finding: The stated intent of the request is for a water -oriented structure.
d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by
the landowner.
Finding: The difficulty of complying with the bluff setback is due to the topography of
the property and a 20 -foot wide sanitary sewer easement. There are not any other areas
on the parcel that the property owner can locate a permanent water -oriented structure.
e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Finding: The granting of the variance would not alter the character of the area. Aerial
images show that multiple properties have water -oriented structures.
f. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota
Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter.
Finding: This does not apply to this request.
5. The planning report #2014-20, dated August 19, 2014, prepared by Drew Ingvalson, et al,
is incorporated herein.
"Me Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustment,
approves Planning Case #2014-20 for a 13 -foot setback variance to allow a water -oriented
structure on property zoned Single -Family Residential District."
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 19'b day of August, 2014.
CrrY OF CHANHASSEN
BY: (�
Chairman
2
Affidavit of Publication
Southwest Newspapers
CITY OF CHANHASSEN Stale of Minnesota)
CARVER & HENNEPIN
COUNTIES )SS.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING County of Carver
PLANNING CASE NO. 2014-20
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
that the Chanhassen Planning
Commission will hold a public Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized
hearing on Tuesday, August 19, agent of the publisher of the newspapers lawnwri as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil-
2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers in Chanhassen City lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows:
Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The
purpose of this hearing is to (A) These iu�wspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal
consider a request for a Variance newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 33 1 A.02, 33 1 A.07, and other applicable laws, as
to the bluff setback to construct mended.
a water -oriented structure on
property zoned Single Family (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No.
Residential (RSF) and located at was published on the date or dates; and in the newspaper stated in the attached Nolm"d7iTai?
38801,oneCedar Lane. Applicant/
Owner: Scott Murphy. Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of
A plan showing the location the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both
of the proposal is available inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition
for public review on the City's and publication of the Notice:
web site at www.ci.chanhassen.
mn.us/2014-20 or at City Hall abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvw
during regular business hours. plyz
All interested persons are invited
to attend this public hearing 4pm4i k "tAL,�
and express their opinions with
respect to this proposal. Laurie A. Hartmann
Drew lngvalson, Planning
Intern
Email: dingvalson(a�
ei.chanhassen.mn.us Subscribed and sworn before me on
Phone: 952-227-1132
(Published in the Chanhassen
Villager on Thursday, August 7, -7
2014; No. 4993) this day of _QA!��2014
JYMNE JEANNETTE BARK
I K�IQPN PLBUC - M NNESTA
�Y�
WY ClUMSS" MRES M31/1.6
&Lfic �/ I
RATE INFORMATION
Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space .... $31.20 M column inch
Maximurn rate allowed bylaw for the above matter. .... ........................... $31.20 per column inch
Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. S 12.59 per column inch
scANNED
0
CM OF
CWHASEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen, MIN 55317
Administration
Phone: 952.227.1100
Fax: 952.227.1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952.2271180
Fax: 952.227.1190
Engineering
Phone: 952.227.1160
Fax: 952.227.1170
Finance
Phone: 952.227,1140
Fax: 952.227.1110
Park & Recreation
Phone: 952-227.1120
Fax: 952.227.1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone: 952.227.1400
Fax: 952,227.1404
Planning &
Natural Resources
Phone: 952.227.1130
Fax: 952.227.1110
Public Works
7901 Park Place
Phone: 952.227.1300
Fax: 952.227.1310
Senior Center
Phone: 952.227.1125
Fax: 952.227.1110
Websile
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us
MEMORANDUM
TO: Drew Ingvalson, Planning Intern
FROM: Terry Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator
DATE: August 19, 2014
RE: Planning Case 2014-20: Request for Variance to the bluff setback
3880 Lone Cedar Road
The applicant is requesting a variance from the required setback to the toe of bluff for
the placement of a water oriented structure as is allowed by code and state rule. The
applicant could avoid the need for the variance by placing the structure atop the
existing sanitary sewer easement. This would require an encroachment agreement and
we would require that the structure be free moving in the event that maintenance is
necessary.
The reason for the bluff setback is to protect the bluff from erosion due to removal of
tree canopy, redirection of surface drainage and increase flow rates and volumes on the
bluff. It is possible to place the water oriented structure such that it does not create
erosive conditions. If a variance is granted, the applicant shall work with city staff to
situate the structure to assure that erosive conditions are not created and the bluff area
is not at risk.
G:\PLAN\2014 Planning Cases\2014-20 3880 Lone Cedar Lane Variance\14-20 WRC-08192014.doa
Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing ior Today and Planning for-Fornorrow
----N
I _LL
PROPOSED MOTION:
'The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the bluff setback variance request and
adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision."
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The property owner is requesting 13 -foot bluff setback variance
from the toe of the bluff to construct a water -oriented structure.
LOCATION: 3880 Lone Cedar Point (PID 25-1700070) OvV-110"
APPLICANT: Scott T. Murphy
3880 Lone Cedar Lane
Chaska, MN 55318
PRESENT ZONING: Single Family Residential (RSF).
2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density
(Net density 1.2 — 4.0 units per acre)
ACREAGE: 0.7 acres DENSITY: NA
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-
MAJONG: The City's discretion in approving or
denying a variance is limited to whether or not the
proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning
Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high
level of discretion with a variance because the applicant
is seeking a deviation firorn established standards. This
is a quasi-judicial decision.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all
property owners within 500 feet.
PROPOSAL/SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting a 13 -foot bluff setback
variance to locate a water -oriented structure 17 feet
from the toe of a bluff.
SCANNED
Planning Commission
3880 Lone Cedar Lane Variance - Planning Case 2014-20
August 19,2014
Page 2 of 4
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 20, Article H, Division 3, Variances
Chapter 20, Article VII, Shoreland Management District
Section 20-481, Placement, design, and height of structure.
Chapter 20, Article XXVRI, Bluff Protection
Section 20-1401, Structure setbacks.
The Bluff Protection section of City Code states, "accessory buildings, except stairways and
landings, are prohibited on the bluff and must be set back from the top of the bluff, the toe of the
bluff and the side of the bluff at least 30 feet" (Sec. 20-1401 (a)). The applicant is requesting a 17 -
foot bluff setback to construct a water-onented structure. The property currently has a legal non-
conforming 6.9 -foot by 7 -foot water -oriented structure located within the bluff on the north side of
the property, which will be removed with the construction of a new water -oriented structure.
U JI-11-FiTui
The applicant is proposing an 18 -foot by 12 -foot water -oriented structure to be constructed 17
feet from the toe of a bluff. This is a 13 -foot variance from the required 30 -foot setback from the
top, toe and side of a bluff (City Code Sec. 20-1401 (a)). The applicant is proposing this location
so that the water -oriented structure is located outside of a 20 -foot wide sanitary sewer easement,
which begins less than 30 feet from the toe of the bluff and ends between 8 feet to 12 feet from
the Ordinary High Water Level, on the property. The applicant is applying for a variance because
he wishes to have a permanent structure, which is not allowed within sanitary sewer easements.
The applicant could avoid the need for the variance by locating the structure atop the existing
sanitary sewer easement. This would require an encroachment agreement, and that the structure
be free moving (i.e. no foundation) so that it can be removed in the event that sanitary sewer
maintenance by the City is necessary.
The applicant's proposed location for the water -oriented structure is completely out of the
sanitary sewer easement. A structure in this location would not need to be removed in the event
that the City needed to complete maintenance within the sanitary sewer easement. On this
property, there are not any areas along the toe side of the bluff that could accommodate a water -
oriented structure without being either within the bluff setback or within the sanitary sewer
easement. The applicant has provided a lot survey showing the proposed water -oriented structure
placement in regards to the toe of the bluff and the bluff setback line (see image on next page).
The proposed location is farther from the Ordinary High Water Level than is required by the
Shoreland Protection Ordinance (Sec. 20-481 (2)). Additionally, being on the downhill side of
the bluff, the structure would not generate additional runoff down the bluff.
Planning Commission
3880 Lone Cedar Lane Variance — Planning Case 2014-20
August 19,2014
Page 3 of 4
The reason for the bluff
setback is to protect the
bluff from erosion due to
removal of the tree
canopy and vegetation,
redirection of surface
drainage and micrease
flow rates and volumes
on the bluff. The
proposed location for the
water -oriented structure
would require minimal
vegetation removal and
could be completed
without increasing
erosive conditions.
As seen below, the Cedar
Crest (Chan)
development does not
have a very extensive
history of granting
variances. Within 500
feet of the subject
property, staff noted
three variance requests.
Of these variance
requests, one was for a
- L*;PR_
--Al"BOn 1�d
S,0! 'Y bwms.,
POICI, A
he conslrtic,.� el
NI
\ I I % \ , I \-- \% 0 , , \ " , %
e -M:
10 -foot bluff setback variance to construct one (1) retaining wall.
Variance
Address
Description
Action
Number
VAR 78-10
3895 Lone Cedar Lane
An 18.5 -foot front yard setback variance for
No
Record of
the construction of a single-family home.
Decision
VAR 02-13
3840 Lone Cedar Lane
A I 0 -foot bluff setback variance to construct
Approved
one (1) retaining wall.
I
CAS 07-07
3820 Lone Cedar Lane
A Subdivision Variance for access off a
Ap
I private street.
If a variance is granted, the Board of Adjustments and Appeals would need to adopt the
appropriate Findings of Fact and Decision. It would also be recommended that the applicant
work with city staff to situate the structure to assure that erosive conditions are not created and
the bluff area is not at risk. The property owner shall remove the existing legal non -conforming
water -oriented structure within the bluff setback. Per City Code (See. 20-481 (2)), "Each lot
Planning Commission
3880 Lone Cedar Lane Variance — Planning Case 2014-20
August 19, 2014
Page 4 of 4
may have one water -oriented accessory structure not meeting the normal structure setback in
subsection 20-48 1 (a)." Furthermore, should the variance be approved, the applicant should be
aware that a building permit is required and the structure must comply with Minnesota State
Building Code.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the variance application and adopt the
attached Findings of Fact and Decision.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Findings of Fact and Decision.
2. Development Review Application.
3. Reduced copy Land Survey.
4. Affidavit of Mailing of Public Hearing Notice.
g:\plan\2014 planning ca�\2014-20 3880 lone cedarlanc varianc6staff reporl: 3880 lone cedar lareAcc
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
IN RE:
Application of Scott T. Murphy for a variance fi-orn the bluff setback requirements to allow for a
18 -foot by 12 -foot water -oriented structure 17 feet from the toe of a bluff on property zoned Single -
Family Residential District (RSF) — Planning Case 2014-20.
On August 19, 2014, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and
Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning
Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and
mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following:
FTNDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Single -Family Residential District (RSF).
2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density.
3. The legal description of the property is as follows:
Lot 7, Block 1, Cedar Crest (Chan), Carver County, Minnesota
4. Variance Findius — Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the
granting of a variance:
a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive
plan.
Finding: The bluff setback requirement is designed to protect and preserve natural
resources. Encroachment into the setback may have a detrimental effect.
b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical
difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the
property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this
Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct
sunlight for solar energy systems.
Finding: The practical difficulty of complying with the bluff setback is due to a 20 -foot
wide sanitary sewer easement located near the shoreline. The property owner is
proposing a permanent water -oriented structure, which are not allowed within sanitary
sewer easements. There are not any other locations near the shoreline that are available
for the property owner to locate a permanent water -oriented structure. The practical
difficulty can be overcome by constructing a water -oriented structure that does not
contain a permanent foundation, and obtaining an encroachment agreement to be located
in the sanitary sewer easement.
c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone.
Finding: The stated intent of the request is for a water -oriented structure.
d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by
the landowner.
Finding: The difficulty of complying with the bluff setback is due to the topography of
the property and a 20 -foot wide sanitary sewer easement. There are not any other areas
on the parcel that the property owner can locate a permanent water -oriented structure;
however, a free standing water -oriented structure can be located within the sanitary sewer
easement, with an encroachment agreement.
e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Finding: The granting of the variance would not alter the character of the area. Aerial
images shows that multiple properties have water -oriented structures.
f, Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota
Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter.
Finding: This does not apply to this request.
5. The planning report #2014-20, dated August 19, 2014, prepared by Drew Ingvalson, et at,
is incorporated herein.
DECISION
"Me Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustment,
denies Planning Case #2014-20 for a 13 -foot setback variance to allow a water -oriented structure
on property zoned Single -Family Residential District."
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 19'b day of August, 2014.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
BY:
Chairman
CITYOF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FeCOM
Planning Division – 7700 Market Boulevard
Mailing Address – P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55314UL 18 2014 G Or OF CMSEK
Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 _#
0*KAMRWftDEPT
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Date Filed: 7/18/2014 60 -Day Review Deadline: 01JiLoL-3-fjl4 planner.- -DaL .1e)(-- Case #:,�cj 14
Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply)
El
comprehensive Plan Amendment ................ ...
11$600
F1
Subdivision
El
Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers .....
$100
E] Create3 lots or less ........................................ $300
El Create over 3 lots ....................... $600 + $15 per lot
0
Conditional Use Permit
[J Metes & Bounds ......................... $300 + $50 per lot
[I
Single -Family Residence ................................
$325
[-] Consolidate Lots .............................................. $150
EJ
All Others ............................................. ...........
$425
E] Lot Line Adjustment ......................................... $150
Final Plat* ... .................................................... $250
Interim Use Permit
*Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs.
El
In conjunction with Single -Family Residence..
$325
Escrow will be required for other applications through the
development contract.
EDAll
Others .........................................................
$425
Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way ........... ....... $300
(Additional recording fees may apply)
Rezoning
El
Planned Unit Development (PIUD) ..................
$750
Variance ............................................................... $200
D
Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................
$100
All Others ............. ...........................................
$500
Wetland Alteration Permit
El Single -Family Residence ............................... $150
Sign
Plan Review ...................................................
$150
E] All Others ............. ................. ....................... $275
Site Plan Review
El
Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100
Administrative ..................................................
$100
Commercial/Industrial Districts . ......................
$500
E)
Zoning Ordinance Amendment ............................ $500
Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area
NOTE: When multiple applications are proCeSsed COnCUrrently,
Include number of existing employees:
ih—eappropriate
tee shall be charged for each appilloofflon.
and number of new employees:
El
Residential Districts ................ ........................
$500
(Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal
Plus $5 per dwelling unit
information that must accompany this application)
ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES:
Notification Sign ................................................... $20Q
(City to install and remove) I % Stf
Property Owners' List within 500 . ........ $3 per address
(City to generate - fee deleanined at pre -application meeting)
Escrow for Recording Documents.. $50 per document
(CUP/SPRNACNARMAP/Metes & Bounds Subdivision)
TOTAL FEES: $ 504.00
Received from: Sccl-+i7 MLkrPK4
Date Received: :a Jis 1. 14 CheckNumber:
Section 2: Required Information
Project Name: boat house
Property Address or Location: 3880 Lone Cedar Lane, Chaska, MN 55318
Parcel *- 25.1700070 1 1 Lot 007, Block 001, subdivision CEDAR CREST (UPINT
0.70 ega DescripLion: —
Total Acreage- Wetlands Present?
Present Zoning: singTe i Fyresidential
Present Land Use Designatign: low Je_n_s_ity_r_es_icTe__nfl
r]Mnr r ;el
Yes N No
Requested Zoning, single family residential _T
Requested Land Use Designation: low density residentia
Existing Use of Property V y �0
Description of Proposal: 12'x 18'water oriented structure built near lake shore
2 Check box if separate narrative is attached
Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information
APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as applicant, represent to have obtained
authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to
the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by
the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application
should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this
application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I
further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to
any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name:
Contact
Address:
Phone:
City/State/Zip:
Cell:
Email:
Fax:
Engineer Via:
Signature:
Date:
PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do,
authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those
conditions. subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of
the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may
be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the
study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name� Scott Murphy Contact Scott Murphy
Addres& 3880 Lone Cedar Lane Phone� 952-401-7824
City/State/Zip: Chaska, MIN 55318 Cell: 612-750-7953
murph—yls—@—me—diac—ombb.net Fax: 952-401-7802
Signature:
Date, 7/18/2014
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all
information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the
appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and
applicable procedural requirements.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A
written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant Within 15 business days of application.
PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable)
Name:
Address:
City/State/Zip�
Email:
Contact:
Phone:
Cell:
Fax:
ection 4; Notification Information
Who should receive copies of staff reports?
*Other Contact Information:
El
Property Owner Via,
0 Email
El Mailed Paper Copy Name: —
El
Applicant Via:
Email
Mailed Paper Copy Address: —
Engineer Via:
Email
Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip:
Other* Via:
Email
Mailed Paper Copy Email:
July, 18,2014
Scott Murphy
3880 Lone Cedar Lane CMOFCHANHASMN
Chaska, MN 55318 RECEIVED
Application for variance on Murphy Boat House project JUL 18 2014
Parcel # 25.1700070 CNONMRAWN DEPT
I am requesting a variance on the placement of a boat house. To meet current set back
requirements (15' from lake shore and 30' from base of the bluff) the boat house would need
to be placed in the center of a 20' sewer easement (see plat map with initial shed placement
proposal). To meet the sewer easement requirements the boat house would need to be
constructed on skids for easy removal if sewer work is ever required. Building the boat house
on skids would be problematic, as the proposed site is significantly sloped towards the lake
(-3' drop over 12' run). Placement of the boat house structure on this site would predispose
the structure to shifting and movement with the seasons, premature failure of the wooden
flooring due to moisture issues, and difficulty maintaining a level floor. Entry into the level
shed floor from a sloped surface would also be an issue.
I am requesting that the boat house be moved 13' further away from the lake. This would place
the boat house 17' feet from the base of the bluff, and out of the sewer easement I realize this
is 13' inside the 30' bluff base set back, but it avoids all of the issues associated with placing the
structure in the sewer easement site. The current 7'x7' water oriented structure on the
property is not large enough to meet our needs, as it is too small store a kayak or paddle board.
This shed would be removed prior to construction of the new boat house.
The project requested is minimally intrusive and environmentally respectful of the site (see
photo of proposed shed placement site) in that its' construction will not effect local drainage or
runoff, there will be no direct impingement on the bluff base, minimal removal of vegetation
will be required, and the set back from the lake wfll actually be increased (in comparison to
site that would meet lake and slope base set back requirements). The size of the boat house
(216 sq. ft.) is less than the allowed 250 sq. ft.. Construction of the shed brings the total
amount of hard cover on the property to 19.4% (total hard cover = 6004 sq.ft, total lot size =
31,020 sq.ft), which is well below the maximum % allowable of 25%. Transportation of
building materials will not damage the slope, as an existing paver pathway will be utilized to
carry materials to the work site with minimal impact on the local environment Also,
construction of the boat house outside the sewer easement removes the structure from a
potential work zone if sewer line repairs are ever required in the future.
Construction of the shed at the requested site follows precedent, in that neighbor boat house
structures are placed in a position similar to or even closer to the lake shore or base of the
bluff. Utilization of a boat house is also a feature enjoyed by current lake property owners, and
a reasonable request for the property considering its' location and expected usage.
I hope you will consider the merits of my request and approve the proposed variance for the
placement of the boat house.
Scott Murphy
j:4v I- " 1 �
tz:
8
4
0
m
0
m
CL
M�
z
LU
2
z
LU
:E
m
0
f -->O
Murphy Boat H4e
50AT�40USE ELEVATION F
1/4" . I. -ON
662:4
C ;CHANHASSEt(
Irl
F Cr
::IV
JUL 18 2014
CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT
Murphy Boat House
IMF',
50ATHOU5E ELEVATION C
1/4"
50ATHOUSE ELEVATION D
1/4-1 . 1.-04,
12
1 12
jTY0FCHANHASSE0
RECEIVED
JUL '18 ?U14
CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT
July 17, 2014
To: City of Chanhassen
Community Development Department
Planning Division
7700 Market Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
From: Ren Rutkus
Todd Moning
3860 Lone Cedar Lane
Chaska, MN 55318
We own the property directly adjacent to the proposed boat house building site. We
have reviewed the plans and the location of the proposed boat house for Scott and
Lori Murphy at 3880 Lone Cedar Lane, Chaska, MN 55318. We do not have any
concerns regarding construction of this structure next to our property and give our
consent and support for the proposed project without reservation.
C rdialll
L
]ken Rutkus
'cz--�Jldoning
CITY OKHANHASSEN
RECEIVED
JUL 1 h ?014
CHANHASMN PLANNING DEM
VG & ENGINEERING CO.
W Phone (612) 474 7964 Fas (612) 474 8267
7 HOMES INC.
DRAH ED. August 4, 2M
.In.
aosed dnvelli.,; ad rehoW arpnwense.n.
atlas and grading for proond dwellin,
. W eb, corrursem.
reAsioars Per eily eorneen.",
nevisicuumcilyconsonanb.
not drive out ofright of my son.
los,.ton. and I.s. of N. ffset piN.
owerocl one Soon and Invited loading
Monsanto
also, lines of the above lopi description. The now (it
but you own, wl,,,h , . le,al PlI,.n ch.k be
It with least ,oaa,wi, ar nore,,a, to ..ke
I.,sad, Itwh as 'in,. you wish,ha....the
...... IM,raurk the earners afflue ropert,
locau.n. 1. ne n. indi.lion rf Ilo, InW,raby of
. due In.elonart, wt,,,I,d an hi, survey. Use [but
M.,� �h.wat an 1he .,, hen deleanining other
I- Inal-I a now noun, no his is, was .,owuned!
Illiorwah yourplans as you and yourawhitect an,,to
itately lefleent what you want to build and where you
Vencies with I itabom .,,or y... rojert resiew the
wals shown. strione yes, ratio any haporoult deendion,
si,,ht Lw. hhabo, 9233. at unless
To" en urIe, was Mquatal I, nator
xressai Parfeadwoul Eaganer.ad
M, 'If Mauretania.
LEGEND
DENOTTS EXISTING (701slTOUR LINE
DENOTES PROPOSED C!0NWUR LINE
VENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION saos,-�
ORNOI ES PROPOSED DIREC110N OF
STORM WATIHK FLOW
DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FEWR —W—W—
I
WbL4TION
PROPOSAW ff4RBCOVER TWbLiTIOAr
%#"`
31,020
sq.
ft.
Lot
31 020
sq.
ft.
1,884
sq.
ft.
House
3:206
sq.
ft.
As 1,340
sq.
ft.
Front Porch and walk
323
sq.
ft.
528
sq.
ft.
Side stoops and stairs
258
sq.
ft.
115
sq.
ft.
Rear Porch/Deck/Stairs
312
sq.
ft.
34
sq.
ft.
Driveway
1146
sq.
ft.
48
sq.
ft.
Paver Path
528
sq.
ft.
3,949
sq.
ft.
Steps
115
sq.
ft.
Proposed Shed
216
sq.
ft.
12.7%
Total hardcover
6,004
sq.
ft.
25% 7,755
sq.
ft.
Percentage hardcover
19.4%
sion 3,806
sq.
ft.*
Chanhassen
2
I
CITY
copy
�z -1 W-Axn%� GRAPHIC SCAU
% 1. 16 "T Is
MEE%Ek=E!5==Eli
tsa.$
P-1� A
'Y
PRO", ED IIO1JSI. RL V S
[UrK)UNI)AIION. OF, - IM3.00
TOPMFOUNDA . 6�F.FN PORCH M."
TGF�POLJND Ohl,"INHOUSE993.31)
GARAGE FLUX - 992.66
LOW FLOOR - .6
ST son FLOW, SEEN POK( IT -
ST SUB FLOOR. 16
o"VIECIP"s
IIJ1 I A 71114
10dra. 1W. 1149VITO
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
1, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on
August 7, 2014, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen,
Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public
Hearing for 3880 Lone Cedar Lane Variance — Planning Case 2014-20 to the persons named
on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such
owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with
postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing
as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other
appropriate records.
PRO I MR -1 REMAIN,
10,
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 1+"Ndayof A 12014.
1 ') -� �—� I
KI "T EU 'SSEN
14_
M � _ 7
NotaryVublic V.'KIM T. MEUMSEN
NOWY PublkMinnegota
on 4: 1 0,5
v C�MW� Ex*pW",k, 1, 2015
Notice of Public Hearing
Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting
Date & Time:
Tuesday, August 19, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start
unfil later In the evening, depending on the order of the agenda.
Location:
CitV Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Request for a Variance to the bluff setback to construct a water -
Proposal:
oriented structure on property zoned Single Family Residential
oriented structure on property zoned Single Family Residential
(RSF)
Applicant:
Scott Murphy
Property
3880 Lone Cedar Lane
Location:
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice.
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
public hearing through the following steps:
What Happens
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
at the Meeting:
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the project.
If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit
If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit
the City's projects web page at:
the City's projects web page at:
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-20. If you wish to talk to
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-20. If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Drew lngvalson by
someone about this project, please contact Drew Ingvalson by
email at dinqvalson(o)ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at
Questions &
952-227-1132. If you choose to submit written comments, it is
Comments:
helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the
helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the
meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The
meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The
staff report for this item will be available online on the
staff report for this item will be available online on the
project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the
project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the
Planning Commission meeting.
-5—tyRevievv —Procedume:
• Subdivisions. Planned unit Developments, site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations,
Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the
Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the
application In writing. Any Interested party is invited to attend the meeting.
• Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation.
These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of
the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of
the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a
recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning
Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the
City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commencialfindustrial.
• Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant
waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any
person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its
status and scheduling for the City Council meeting.
• A neighborhood spokespersontrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers
are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. staff is also available to review the
project with any Interested person(s).
• Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and
any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. 9 you wish to have
something to be Included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. _
Notice of Public Hearing
Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting
Date & Time:
Tuesday, August 19, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start
until later In the evening, depending on the order of the agenda.
Location:
City Hall
Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Request for a Variance to the bluff setback to construct a water -
Proposal:
oriented structure on property zoned Single Family Residential
(RSF)
Applicant
Scott Murphy
Property
3880 Lone Cedar Lane
Location:
A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice.
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
public hearing through the following steps:
What Happens
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
at the Meeting:
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the project.
If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit
the City's projects web page at:
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-20. If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Drew Ingvalson by
email at dinqvalson(cDci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at
Questions &
952-227-1132. If you choose to submit written comments, it is
Comments:
helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the
meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The
staff report for this item will be available online on the
project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the
I Planning Commission meeting.
City Review Procedure:
• Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations,
Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the
Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the
application In writing. Any Interested party is Invited to attend the meeting.
• Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation.
These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting. staff will give a verbal overview of
the report and a recommendation. The Item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of
the hearing process. The Commission wit close the public hearing and discuss the Item and make a
recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning
Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the
City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commemial/industdal.
• Minnesota state Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant
waives this standard. some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any
person wishing to follow an Item through the process should check Wth the Planning Department regarding its
status and scheduling for the City Council meeting.
• A neighborhood spokespersonlrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers
am encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the
project with any Interested person(s).
• Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. minutes are taken and
any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council, If you wish to have
I something to be Included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification.
ALLAN R & CHRISTINE A AHO AUGUST B & AMY J SIEFKER CHARLY R WEBBER
3890 FOREST RIDGE CIR 3895 LONE CEDAR CIR 3850 LONE CEDAR CIR
CHASKA, MN 55318-9657 CHASKA, MN 55318-9653 CHASKA, MN 55318-9652
FREDERICK ALLAN DATNE JR
7501 77TH ST W
CHASKA, MN 55318-9611
KIRK S & RENEE C BORAAS
7502 77TH ST W
CHASKA, MN 55318-9611
ROBERT E FROLUND
3888 FOREST RIDGE CIR
CHASKA, MN 55318-9657
SCOTT ALLEN BROIN
3840 LONE CEDAR CIR
CHASKA, MN 55318-9652
THOMAS L & CARMEN HUESMAN
3861 LONE CEDAR LN
CHASKA, MN 55318-9609
WILLIAM J PLANT
3884 FOREST RIDGE CIR
CHASKA, MN 55318-9657
GARY D JOHNSON
15020 IRONWOOD CT
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346-2601
LOC HOANG
3881 LONE CEDAR LN
CHASKA, MN 55318-9609
ROSS SPANIER
2838 FREMONT AVE S UNIT 518
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408-4815
SCOTT P & LAURIE A GAUER
3820 LONE CEDAR CIR
CHASKA, MN 55318-9652
TODD C & REN A MONING
3860 LONE CEDAR CIR
CHASKA, MN 55318-9652
GREGG R & GAY MARIE JANDRO
3896 LONE CEDAR LN
CHASKA, MN 55318-9609
LORI A BARTMAN
3886 FOREST RDG
CHASKA, MN 55318-9657
RYAN M JOHNSON
3892 LONE CEDAR LN
CHASKA, MN 55318-9609
SCOTT T MURPHY
3880 LONE CEDAR LN
CHASKA, MN 55318-9609
WILLIAM D & DEBRA J HUMPHRIES
3890 LONE CEDAR CIR
CHASKA, MN 55318-9652
AD"NCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO.
5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (612) 474 7964 Fax (612) 474 8267
SURVEY FOR: COBBLESTONE HOMES INC.
SURVEYED: August, 2009 DRAFTED: August 4, 2009
REVISED: August 19, 2009, to show bluff line.
REVISED: November 17, 2009, to show proposed dwelling and related improvements.
REVISED: July 1, 2011, to show revised location and grading for proposed dwelling.
REVISED: August 2, 2011, to show revisions per city comments.
REVISED: August 12, 2011, to show further revisions per city comments.
REVISED: August 15, 2011, to show further revisions per city comments.
REVISED: August 15, 2011, to widen proposed drive out of right of way area.
REVISED: August 16, 2011, to show actual location and elev. of N. offset pipe.
REVISED: August 25, 2011, to show house lowered one foot and revised grading
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lat-7- Block L Cestar Creg.�C�arve ��, Minnesota
LIMITATIONS & NOTES:
1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal description. The scope of
our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the
legal description W@th your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make
sure that it is correct, and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish shown on the
survey, have been shown.
2. Showing the location of existing visible improvements.
3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monuments to mark the comers of the property.
4. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of
the site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that
benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the map when determining other
elevations for use on this site.
5. While we have shown your proposal to buittl a new home on this site with associated
improvements and grading, we are not as familiar with your plans as you and your architect are, so
please review the survey to make sure it accurately leflects what you want to build and where you
want to build it, and have any governmental agencies with jurisdiction over your project review the
survey to make sure they ap rove of the proposals shown, before you makk, airy important decisions
I p
about your project.
STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:
"c" Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing St,� te License Number 9235, set, unless
otherwise noted.
CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, report or survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Engineer and
Professional Survevor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
H. Paiker P.E. & P.S. No
CJTY OF CHANHASSEN
AUG "1 5 2011
ENOMFERING DEPT,
APPROVED
BY:
DEP i
DATE; aj��_F
BY. 15 kL-zl
DEPTJ -EWUC�
DAM
'PT
5
ErJS717AI�r
r 77
ff_,4R,VC0 VER '4,8M T10yV
Lot
31,020
f t -
sq.
ft.
House
1,884
sq.
sq.
ft.
Concrete drive & walks
1,340
6,004
sq.
ft.
Paver Path
528
sq.
ft.
Steps
115
sq.
ft.
Ret. Wall
34
sq.
ft.
Shed
48
sq.
ft.
Total hardcover
3,949
sq.
ft.
Percentage hardcover
Allowable hardcover 25%
12.7%
7, 755 sq. ft.
Allowable h.c. expansion 3,806 sq. ft.*
*verify with City of Chanhassen
LEGEND
DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR LINE
DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE
DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
DENOTES PROPOSED DIRECTION OF
STORM WATER FLOW
DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE
— — —980— — —
995.9---
9�__
SF — SF
vg� - -,
- ovo 4%
VW C)fi. - c3W
-44
V��C3
11--- ov
W 19
9CO. 0 )91
?Os�" ovo
1�& cv
V-0
3ENCHMARK:
NUT HYDRAb�-
ELEV.=9
k
NANHU �' � , 6
RIM ELE.-
13
4(-
kp,\* -S
Y
PEOPOASEV ffJRJOCOVEE FJ_8UL4F101V
Lot
House
Front Porch and walk
Side stoops and stairs
Rear Porch/Deck/Stairs
Driveway
Paver Path
Steps
Proposed Shed
Total hardcover
Percentage hardcover
C 0?
& '0
�o
C 6105 �o'('� OAV
00! k�C'0
co
1P 5r,
�Q'
31, 020 sq. ft.
3,206 sq. ft.
323 sq. ft.
258 sq. ft.
312 q( -T ft 'P
1146
sq.
f t -
528
sq.
f t -
115
sq.
f t -
216
sq.
f t -
6,004
sq.
ft.
19.4%
SCANNED
�(Kv Cmo
fw
IvreN
JUL 18 Z014
SCANNED
CITY
COP
------ 20 FOOT UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
SHOWN ON PLAT OF TROLL GLEN - ------------ ----- ---------- A
------------- 0 ------- MANHOLE AND EASEMENT LOCATION PER
MEASUREMENTS ON PLAT OF TROLLS GLEN GRAPHIC SCALE
-A 20 0 10 20 40
IN FEET
ip
On A S
So" ev3hlatiorl and C0fraCtj,)r1 for
Ptlillary bujl�ji4j�
not
"o loco 11111100a fe
k POrCII. A soil
7&\ eva]Lla�IC)i, 11) y be
* 0 ��or tbe COIlStrUction of a fu"
7-4
0 twe
��rs\Tll G�Sld'ED)
k�(t BE
RE4iov�)--l'
(P
9�
No
>
vit
,;-:-Zz=--20 FOOT WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
'�Xj-9N6 E STEP�
TING ' K___
0 TO\BE \MC PER DOC. NO. 19617
ot�
1p
\ \ V
ij 05— 'P
VY -
.44u—
<
9P 9P
I C�
1
-0
vr V%,".
XISTA; FIAV�; 0,ATk
d, M
FI�D
'-N�ETAININJ::
I
A V1, (I
.'P V�d
1146 (0%1
ANH�LE�'
LEV _9
RIM E .7
----TOE OF BLUFF LINE
C, 956 CONTOUR
VERIFY NTH C1
0
'Q
Q
Aq
4-
1P
MANHOLE.b
RIM ELEV.-903.4
X
I
4A U;p�ee
-0
,A'
�5
0.
PROPOSED HOUSE ELEVAOMS
TOP FOUNDATION, GE = 993.00
TOP OF FOUNDA10 KSCREEN PORCH 994.98
TOP �D ON, MAIN HOUSE 995.30
I- FO N
GARAZEFLO 992.66
LOW FLOOR = 86.6
ISTSUBFLOO SCREENPORCH=
I ST SUB FLOOR, 7.16
CITY CIFCHANHASSEN
RECEIVED
JUL 18 ?014
CHANHASSEN PLANMNO DEPT
'PKC. YVO. 1103346
Date: July 23, 2014
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952) 227-1100
To: Development Plan Referral Agencies
From: Planning Department
Review Response Deadline: Augrust6,2014
By: Drew Ingvalson, Planning Intem (952) 227-1132
dingyalson(&,ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Subject: Request for a Variance to the bluff setback to construct a water -oriented structure on property zoned
Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 3880 Lone Cedar Lane.
Applicant/Owner: Scott Murphy
Planning Case: 2014-20 PID: 25-1700070
The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning
Department on July 18,2014. The 60 -day review period ends September 16,2014.
In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would
appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and
proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites,
street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written
report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City
Council.
This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on August 19, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in
die Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than August 6,
2014. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is
greatly appreciated.
1. City Departments:
a. City Engineer
b. City Attorney
c. City Park Director
d. Fire Marshal
e. Building Official
E Water Resources Coordinator
g. Forester � D CVMWA�'
2. Carver Soil& Water Conservation District
3. MN Dept. of Transportation
4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources
5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife
7. Carver County
a. Engineer
b. Environmental Services
8. Watershed District Engineer
a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek
b. Lower Minnesota River
c. Minnehaba Creek
9- Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint/United)
10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley)
11. Mediacom.
12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco
Property Card
Taxpayer Information
Taxpayer Name
SCOTT T MURPHY
LORI ANN BOETTCHER
Mailing Address
3880 LONE CEDAR LN
CHASKA, MN 55318-9609
Property Address
Address
3880 LONE CEDAR LN
City
CHASKA, MN 55318
Parcel ID Number 251700070
Miscellaneous Information
School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve
0112 WS 062 MINNEHAHA CREEK Y N N
Assessor Information
Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale
(Payable 2014) (Payable 2015)
Land $418,800.00 $442,000.00 Date of Sale 08/28/2008
Building $665,700.00 $778,300.00 Sale Value $750,000.00
Total $1,084,500.00 $1,220,300.00 Qualified/
Unqualified
Disclaimer This information is to te used for reference purposes only C"r C 4 ?6
accuracy of the material
contained herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation T*# preceding dis aiiiier is prinAded pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 466.03. Subc. 21 (2000) and the usfr of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages, and
expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend. indemnify, and hold harrOess the County from any and all claims brought by User,
CARVER its employees or agents, or third parties which anse out of the users access or use of data provided,
COUNTY
Wednesday, July 23, 2014 Carver County, MN page I of I
Parcel Information
Uses Res I unit
GIS Acres 0.70
Tax Acres
Plat CEDAR CREST (CHAN)
Lot 007
Block 001
Tax Description
Building Information
Building Style 2STORY
Finished Sq Ft 4121 Bedrooms 5
Year Built 2011
Other Garage Y Bathrooms 3.25
Miscellaneous Information
School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve
0112 WS 062 MINNEHAHA CREEK Y N N
Assessor Information
Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale
(Payable 2014) (Payable 2015)
Land $418,800.00 $442,000.00 Date of Sale 08/28/2008
Building $665,700.00 $778,300.00 Sale Value $750,000.00
Total $1,084,500.00 $1,220,300.00 Qualified/
Unqualified
Disclaimer This information is to te used for reference purposes only C"r C 4 ?6
accuracy of the material
contained herein and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation T*# preceding dis aiiiier is prinAded pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 466.03. Subc. 21 (2000) and the usfr of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages, and
expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend. indemnify, and hold harrOess the County from any and all claims brought by User,
CARVER its employees or agents, or third parties which anse out of the users access or use of data provided,
COUNTY
Wednesday, July 23, 2014 Carver County, MN page I of I
crryOF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1`11BIXIVED
Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard
Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55314UL 18 2014 CITY OF CMSEK
Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 #_
CHANHAMRANNNGDEpT
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Date Filed: 7/18/2014 60 -Day Review Deadline: 9L�La�_4 Planner: _QT e, L, Case #:,;,C, 14 —"4�
Section 1: Application Type �checlk all that apply)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment ............ ...... $600 Subdivision
El Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ..... $100
El Conditional Use Permit
El Single -Family Residence ................................ $325
ED All Others ......................................................... $425
El Interim Use Permit
D in conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325
ElAll Others ..................................... ................... $425
El Rezoning
0
Planned Unit Development (PUD) ...
.......... ... $750
El
Minor Amendment to existing PUD .................
$100
ElAll
Others ................................... .....................
$500
El Sign
Plan Review ...................................................
$150
Site Plan Review
Lot Line Adjustment ... .....................................
El
Administrative ..................................................
$100
0
Commercial/industrial Districts* ......................
$500
$100
Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area
applications through the
*Include number of existing employees:
development contract
The
and number of new employees:
(Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal
Residential Districts.... ... .................................
$500
Plus $5 per dwelling unit
ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES:
Notification Sign ................................. ............... $200
(City to install and remove) % 51
Property Owners' List within 500 . ........ $3 per address
(City to generate — fee determined at pre -application meeting)
Escrow for Recording Documents.. $50 per document
(CUPISPRIVACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds Subdivision)
[]
Create 3 lots or less .......................................
� $300
El
Create over 3 lots .......................
$600 + $15 per lot
El
Metes & Bounds .........................
$300 + $50 per lot
E3
Consolidate Lots. .............................................
$150
[I
Lot Line Adjustment ... .....................................
$150
El
Final Plat* ... .................................................
$250
El
*Requires additional S450 escrow for attorney costs.
$100
Escrow will be required for other
applications through the
$500
development contract
The
El
Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way ...................
$300
(Additional recording fees may appIy)
idVariance
...............................................................
$200
Fl
Wetland Alteration Permit
El Single -Family Residence ...............................
$150
E] All Others .......................................................
$275
El
Zoning Appeal ..................................... ...... .........
$100
E)
Zoning Ordinance Amendment ........................ __
$500
NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently,
—approprlate
The
tee shall be charged for each application.
(Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal
information that must accompany this application)
TOTAL FEES: $ 504.00
Received fromi Scci+�- M(,i, P4
Date Received: -i 1 0; 1 1-4 Check Number: (0 -3(,2
Section 2: Required Information
Project Name: boathouse
Property Address or Location 3880 Lone Cedar Lane, Chaska, MN 55318
Parcel #: 25.1700070 Lenal Description: Lot 007, Block 001, subdivision CEDAR CREST (CRANT
Total Acreage: 0.70 Wetlands Present? -
01nnTQ__fn__m__iT%_,rn�iA +i I
Present Zoning: U11 a
Present Land Use Designatign: low density residenti
0 Yes 9 No
sinnle familv residential
Requested Zoning -
Requested Land Use Designation: low density residentia
Existing Use of Property primary residence
Description of Proposal: 12'x 18'water oriented structure built near lake shore
2 Check box if separate narrative is attached
I Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information
APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as applicant, represent to have obtained
authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to
the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by
the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application
should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this
application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I
further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate pnor to
any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Email:
Signature:
Contact
Phone:
Cell:
Fax:
Date:
PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do,
authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to ae bound by those
conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of
the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may
be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the
study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name: Scott Murphy Contact: Scott Murphy
Address: 3880 Lone Cedar Lane Phone: 952-401-7824
City/State/Zip: Chaska, 55318 Cell: 61-2-7-5-0-- 79 53
PM.R. murphyET—m—eUi —aco m b b. n e t 9 5-2-4 U1 --7 8 0 2
Signature:
ax
Date. 7/18/2014
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all
information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the
appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and
applicable procedural requirements.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A
written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application.
PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable)
Name:
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Email:
Contact:
Phone:
Cell:
Fax:
I Section 4: Notification Information
Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information:
El
Property Owner Via:
E] Email
L] Mailed Paper Copy Name:
El
Applicant Via:
E] Email
[I Mailed Paper Copy Address:
El
Engineer Via:
E] Email
E] Mailed Paper Copy City/Stal:O—lp
D
Other* Via:
0 Email
E] Mailed Paper Copy Email:
July, 18, 2014
Scott Murphy
3880 Lone Cedar Lane CITYOFCHANHASSEN
Chaska, MN 55318 RECEIVED
Application for variance on Murphy Boat House project JUL 18 2014
Parcel # 25.1700070 CROOM PLAWNG DEPT
I am requesting a variance on the placement of a boat house. To meet current set back
requirements (15' from lake shore and 30' from base of the bluff) the boat house would need
to be placed in the center of a 20' sewer easement (see plat map with initial shed placement
proposal). To meet the sewer easement requirements the boat house would need to be
constructed on skids for easy removal if sewer work is ever required. Building the boat house
on skids would be problematic, as the proposed site is significantly sloped towards the lake
(-3' drop over 12' run). Placement of the boat house structure on this site would predispose
the structure to shifting and movement with the seasons, premature failure of the wooden
flooring due to moisture issues, and difficulty maintaining a level floor. Entry into the level
shed floor from a sloped surface would also be an issue.
I am requesting that the boat house be moved 13' further away from the lake. This would place
the boat house 17' feet from the base of the bluff, and out of the sewer easement. I realize this
is 13'inside the 30'bluff base set back, but it avoids all of the issues associated with placing the
structure in the sewer easement site. The current Tx7' water oriented structure on the
property is not large enough to meet our needs, as it is too small store a kayak or paddle board.
This shed would be removed prior to construction of the new boat house.
The project requested is minimally intrusive and environmentally respectful of the site (see
photo of proposed shed placement site) in that its' construction will not effect local drainage or
runoff, there will be no direct impingement on the bluff base, minimal removal of vegetation
will be required, and the set back from the lake will actually be increased (in comparison to
site that would meet lake and slope base set back requirements). The size of the boat house
(216 sq. ft.) is less than the allowed 2SO sq. ft.. Construction of the shed brings the total
amount of hard cover on the property to 19.4% (total hard cover = 6004 sq.ft; total lot size =
31,020 sq.ft), which is well below the maximum % allowable of 25%. Transportation of
building materials will not damage the slope, as an existing paver pathway will be utilized to
carry materials to the work site with minimal impact on the local environment Also,
construction of the boat house outside the sewer easement removes the structure from a
potential work zone if sewer line repairs are ever required in the future.
Construction of the shed at the requested site follows precedent, in that neighbor boat house
structures are placed in a position similar to or even closer to the lake shore or base of the
bluff. Utilization of a boat house is also a feature enjoyed by current lake property owners, and
a reasonable request for the property considering its'location and expected usage.
I hope you will consider the merits of my request and approve the proposed variance for the
placement of the boat house.
Scott Murphy
�L::
t 4;51
5 1 1
rl,
(1)
U)
0
m
0
m
CL
OE:
z
uj
L)
�w
OCE
z
ul
d)
I
50AT�40L15E ELEVATION F
1/4-1. I. -o.
CITY OF CHANHASSEt4
RECEIVED
JUL 18 2014
CIIANHASWNKMWMWT
(D
OF.
z
w
I
LLI
LLI
(f)
1-3
I
lu
I
w
w
(j)
I
I
LU
cr)
U)
<
LLI
U -i
OLD
�uj
0 CE
fir
EL
w
July 17, 2014
To: City of Chanhassen
Community Development Department
Planning Division
7700 Market Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
From: Ren Rutkus
Todd Moning
3860 Lone Cedar Lane
Chaska, MN 55318
We own the property directly adjacent to the proposed boat house building site. We
have reviewed the plans and the location of the proposed boat house for Scott and
Lori Murphy at 3880 Lone Cedar Lane, Chaska, MN 55318. We do not have any
concerns regarding construction of this structure next to our property and give our
consent and support for the proposed project without reservation.
+Z7C diall ,
�uk&z'��
Ren Rutkus
Moning
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
RECEIVED
JUL 'I H 2014
CHWASSEN PWMING DEPT
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING CASE NO. 2014-20
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a
public hearing on Tuesday, August 19, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in
Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for
a Variance to the bluff setback to construct a water -oriented structure on property zoned Single
Family Residential (RSF) and located at 3880 Lone Cedar Lane. Applicant/Owner: Scott Murphy.
A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the City's web
site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2014-20 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All
interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to
this proposal.
Drew Ingvalson, Planning Intern
Email: din-gyalson(&ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Phone: 952-227-1132
(Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on August 7, 2014)
SCANNED
Date: July 23, 2014
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952) 227-1100
To: Development Plan Referral Agencies
From: Planning Department
Review Response Deadline: Augrust:6.2014
By: Drew Ingvalson, Planning Intern (952) 227-1132
dingyalsonC&,ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Subject: Request for a Variance to the bluff setback to construct a water -oriented structure on property zoned
Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 3880 Lone Cedar Lane.
Applicant/Owner: Scott Murphy
Planning Case: 2014-20 PID: 25-1700070
The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning
Department on July 18, 2014. The 60 -day review period ends September 16, 2014.
In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would
appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and
proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites,
street extensions or improvements, and utilities, Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written
report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City
Council.
This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanha sen Planning Commission on August 19, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in
the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than August 6,
2014. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is
greatly appreciated.
1. City Departments:
a. City Engineer
b. City Attorney
c. City Park Director
d. Fire Marshal
e. Building Official
f. Water Resources Coordinator
g. Forester
2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District
3. MN Dept. of Transportation
4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources
5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife
7. Carver County
a. Engineer
b. Environmental Services
8. Watershed District Engineer
a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek
b. Lower Minnesota River
c. Minnehaha Creek
9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint/United)
10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley)
11. Mediacom
12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco
Property Card
Taxpayer Information
Taxpayer Name
SCOTT T MURPHY
LORI ANN BOETTCHER
Mailing Address
3880 LONE CEDAR LN
CHASKA, MN 55318-9609
Property Address
Address
3880 LONE CEDAR LN
City
CHASKA, MIN 55318
Parcel ID Number 251700070
Miscellaneous Information
School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve
0112 WS 062 MINNEHAHA CREEK Y N N
Assessor Information
Estimated Market Value (P 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale
ayable 2014) (Payable 2015)
Land $418,800.00 $442,000.00 Date of Sale 08/28/2008
Building S665,700.00 $778,300.00 Sale Value $750,000.00
Total $1,0a,4,500.00 $1,220,300.00 Qualified/ Q
Unqualified
Disclaimer This information is to be used for reference purposes only Carver County does not guarantee accuracy of the material
contained harem and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretabon. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 466.03 Subi 21 (2000) and the user of this service acknowledges that Me County shall not be liable for any damages. and
expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend. indemnify. and hold harmless the County from any and all claims brought by User.
CARVER its employees or agents. or third parties which allse out of the user's access or use of data provided.
COUNTY
Wednesday, July 23. 2014 Carver County, MN Page I Of I
Parcel Information
Uses Res 1 unit
GIS Acres 0.70
Tax Acres
Plat CEDAR CREST (CHAN)
Lot 007
Block 001
Tax Description
Building Information
Building Style 2 STORY
Finished Sq Ft 4121 Bedrooms 5
Year Built 2011
Other Garage Y Bathrooms 3.25
Miscellaneous Information
School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve
0112 WS 062 MINNEHAHA CREEK Y N N
Assessor Information
Estimated Market Value (P 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale
ayable 2014) (Payable 2015)
Land $418,800.00 $442,000.00 Date of Sale 08/28/2008
Building S665,700.00 $778,300.00 Sale Value $750,000.00
Total $1,0a,4,500.00 $1,220,300.00 Qualified/ Q
Unqualified
Disclaimer This information is to be used for reference purposes only Carver County does not guarantee accuracy of the material
contained harem and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretabon. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 466.03 Subi 21 (2000) and the user of this service acknowledges that Me County shall not be liable for any damages. and
expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend. indemnify. and hold harmless the County from any and all claims brought by User.
CARVER its employees or agents. or third parties which allse out of the user's access or use of data provided.
COUNTY
Wednesday, July 23. 2014 Carver County, MN Page I Of I
Property Card
Taxpayer Information
Taxpayer Name
SCOTT T MURPHY
LORI ANN BOETTCHER
Mailing Address
3880 LONE CEDAR LN
CHASKA, MN 55318-9609
Property Address
Address
3880 LONE CEDAR LN
city
CHASKA, MN 55318
Parcel ID Number 251700070
Miscellaneous Information
School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve
0112 WS 062 MINNEHAHA CREEK Y N N
Assessor Information
Estimated Market Value (P 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale
ayable 2014) (Payable 2015)
Land $418,800.00 $442,000.00 Date of Sale 08/28/2008
Building $665,700.00 $778,300.00 Sale Value $750,000.00
Total $1,084,500.00 $1,220,300.00 Qualified/
Unqualified
AM D.si'laim"' This information is to be used for reference purposes only, Carver County does not guarantee accuracy Of the material
conii harem and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpreiration. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota
St. . 466 Subd� 21 (2000), and the user of this service acknoydedges that line County shall not be liable for any damages and
expressly waives all claims. and agrees to defend, indemnify. and hold harmless the County from any and all clairns brought by User,
CARM its employees or agents, or third parties which anse out of the user's access or use of data provided.
COUNTY
Wednesday, July 23, 2014 Carver County, MN Page 1 of 1
SCANNED
Parcel Information
Uses Res I unit
GIS Acres 0.70
Tax Acres
Plat CEDAR CREST (CHAN)
Lot 007
Block 001
Tax Description
Building Information
Building Style 2 STORY
Finished Sq Ft 4121 Bedrooms 5
Year Built 2011
Other Garage Y Bathrooms 3.25
Miscellaneous Information
School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve
0112 WS 062 MINNEHAHA CREEK Y N N
Assessor Information
Estimated Market Value (P 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale
ayable 2014) (Payable 2015)
Land $418,800.00 $442,000.00 Date of Sale 08/28/2008
Building $665,700.00 $778,300.00 Sale Value $750,000.00
Total $1,084,500.00 $1,220,300.00 Qualified/
Unqualified
AM D.si'laim"' This information is to be used for reference purposes only, Carver County does not guarantee accuracy Of the material
conii harem and is not responsible for misuse or misinterpreiration. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota
St. . 466 Subd� 21 (2000), and the user of this service acknoydedges that line County shall not be liable for any damages and
expressly waives all claims. and agrees to defend, indemnify. and hold harmless the County from any and all clairns brought by User,
CARM its employees or agents, or third parties which anse out of the user's access or use of data provided.
COUNTY
Wednesday, July 23, 2014 Carver County, MN Page 1 of 1
SCANNED
CrrVOFCH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RMED
Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard
Mailing Address - P.O� Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55314UL 18 2014 CITY OF CHMNSEN
Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax� (952) 227-1110
`_4ANHAMPbANNINGDFP7.
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Date Filed 7/18/2014 60 -Day Review Deadline: 9 Li L�� 4 Planner. _QT -A G 14 -0,0
.16 L Case 0:
Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment.. .... ....... __ ... - $600
0 Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ..... $100
El Conditional Use Permit
El Single -Family Residence ................................ $325
El All Others ......................................................... $425
El Interim Use Permit
El In conjunction with Single -Family Residence.. $325
El All Others .................. ......................... ........ __ $425
El
Rezoning
El
Planned Unit Development (PUD) ..................
$750
0
minor Amendment to existing PUD .................
$100
El
All Others ....... .......... ......................................
$500
ED
Sign
Plan Review ..............................................
.... $150
El
Site Plan Review
ED
Administrative ...................... ...........................
$100
E)
Commercial/Industrial Districts . ......................
$500
Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area
*Include number of existing employees:
and number of new employees:
Residential Districts .........................................
$500
Plus $5 per dwelling unit
ADDITIONAL REQUIRED FEES:
Notification Sign. .................................................. $200
(City to install and remove) 1% S4
Property Owners' List within 500 . ..... _ $3 per address
(City to generate – fee deterrinined at pre -application meeting)
Escrow for Recording Documents.. $50 per document
(CUP/SPR/VACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds Subdivision)
F-1 Subdivision
F� Create 3 lots or less .............. ............. ...... .... $300
F-1 Create over 3 lots ................. ..... $600 + $15 per lot
El Metes & Bounds ............... ......... $300 + $50 per lot
Consolidate Lots ........................................... _ $150
Lot Line Adjustment ............................. .... _ .... $150
FinalPlat*...... ... .............................................. $250
*Requires additional $450 escrow for attorney costs.
Escrow will be required for other applications through the
development contract.
Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way ................... $300
(Additional recording fees may apply)
variance........................................................... ... $200
Wetland Alteration Permit
El Single -Family Residence ............................... $150
[J All Others ....................................................... $275
Zoning Appeal .................... ................................. $100
Fj Zoning Ordinance Amendment ............................ $500
NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently,
The—appropriate tee shall be charged for each application.
(Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal
information that must accompany this application)
TOTAL FEES: $ 504-00
Received from: Scci+�' Mi,( plq,
Date Received: -.2 1 12 114 Check Number: 1,6
Section 2: Required Information
Project Name boat house
Property Address or Location 3880 Lone Cedar Lane, Chaska, MN 55318
Parcel # 25.1700070 Le al Descri tion. Lot 007, Block 001, subdivision CEDAR CREST (CHAN)
0.70 r —
Total Acreage __-_ Wetlands Present?
Present Zoning . singTe—fa-FiTy-residential
I o w R _r ---- --',
Yes E No
Requested Zoning. single family residential
low densit residential
Present Land Use Designatign: Requested Land Use Designation: y
Existing Use o roperty: primary residence
Description of P posal: 12' x 18' water oriented structure built near lake shore
R Check box if separate narrative is attached
I Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information
APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as applicant, represent to have obtained
authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to
the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by
the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application
should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this
application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I
further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to
any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name: Contact:
Address: Phone:
City/State/Zip:
Email:
Signature: _
Cell:
Fax:
Date:
PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do,
authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those
conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of
the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may
be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate pdor to any authorization to proceed with the
study- I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name: Scott Murphy Contact: Scott Murphy
Address: 3-8TO-Eo--ne Cedar Lane Phone: 952-401-7824
-T-7—
City/State/Zilp: Chaska, MN 55318 Cell: 61 - 50-7953
Email: murphyFs-@mediacombb.net Fax: 952-401-7802
Signature:
Date. 7118/2014
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly pnnted and must be accompanied by all
information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the
appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and
applicable procedural requirements.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A
written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application.
PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable)
Name:
Contact
Address:
Phone:
City/State/Zip:
Cell:
Email:
Fax:
-11111111111111111111illillillillillillilliilililI
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillim --
Who should receive copies of staff reports?
*Other Contact Information:
El
Property Owner Via:
E] Email
C] Mailed Paper Copy
Name:
El
Applicant Via:
F] Email
Mailed Paper Copy
Address:
El
Engineer Via:
El Email
Mailed Paper Copy
City/State/Zip:
El
Other* Via:
E] Email
El Mailed Paper Copy
Email:
I Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information
APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as applicant, represent to have obtained
authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to
the right to object at the headngs on the application or during the appeal period- If this application has not been signed by
the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application
should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this
application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I
further understand that addibonal fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to
any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Email:
Signature:
Contact
Phone:
Cell:
Fax:
Date:
PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, 1, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do,
authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those
conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of
the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may
be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the
study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct.
Name: Scott Murphy Contact: Scott Murphy
Address: 3880 Lone Cedar Lane Phone: 05T-461-780---
City/State/Zip: Chaska, MN 55318 Cell: 113f2-70-77953
C ;, murph—ylsT�-miac�om.ne�t��� 952-401-7802
ma :
Signature:
Fax:
Date: 7/18/2014
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all
information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the
appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and
applicable procedural requirements.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A
written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application.
PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable)
Name:
Contact:
Address:
Phone:
City/State/Zip:
Cell:
Email:
Fax:
I Section 4: Notification Information
Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information:
El
Property Owner Via:
E] Email
I–) Mailed Paper Copy Name:
El
Applicant Via:
E] Email
E] Mailed Paper Copy Address:
El
Engineer Via:
E] Email
Mailed Paper Copy City/statO—lp
F-1
Other* Via:
E] Email
Mailed Paper Copy Email:
SCANNED
July, 18,2014
Scott Murphy
3880 Lone Cedar Lane ciTYOFCHANHASSEtq
Chaska, MN 55318 RECEIVED
Application for variance on Murphy Boat House project JUL 18 2014
Parcel # 25.1700070 rHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT
I am requesting a variance on the placement of a boat house. To meet current set back
requirements (15' from lake shore and 30' from base of the bluff) the boat house would need
to be placed in the center of a 20' sewer easement (see plat map with initial shed placement
proposal). To meet the sewer easement requirements the boat house would need to be
constructed on skids for easy removal if sewer work is ever required. Building the boat house
on skids would be problematic, as the proposed site is significantly sloped towards the lake
(-3' drop over 12' run). Placement of the boat house structure on this site would predispose
the structure to shifting and movement with the seasons, premature failure of the wooden
flooring due to moisture issues, and difficulty maintaining a level floor. Entry into the level
shed floor from a sloped surface would also be an issue.
I am requesting that the boat house be moved 13' further away from the lake. This would place
the boat house 17' feet from the base of the bluff, and out of the sewer easement. I realize this
is 13'inside the 30' bluff base set back, but it avoids all of the issues associated with placing the
structure in the sewer easement site. The current 7x7' water oriented structure on the
property is not large enough to meet our needs, as it is too small store a kayak or paddle board.
This shed would be removed prior to construction of the new boat house.
The project requested is minimally intrusive and environmentally respectful of the site (see
photo of proposed shed placement site) in that its' construction will not effect local drainage or
runoff, there will be no direct impingement on the bluff base, minimal removal of vegetation
will be required, and the set back from the lake will actually be increased (in comparison to
site that would meet lake and slope base set back requirements). The size of the boat house
(216 sq. ft.) is less than the allowed 250 sq. ft.. Construction of the shed brings the total
amount of hard cover on the property to 19.4% (total hard cover = 6004 sq.ft; total lot size =
31,020 sq.ft), which is well below the maximum % allowable of 25%. Transportation of
building materials will not damage the slope, as an existing paver pathway will be utilized to
carry materials to the work site with minimal impact on the local environment. Also,
construction of the boat house outside the sewer easement removes the structure from a
potential work zone if sewer line repairs are ever required in the future.
Construction of the shed at the requested site follows precedent, in that neighbor boat house
structures are placed in a position similar to or even closer to the lake shore or base of the
bluff. Utilization of a boat house is also a feature enjoyed by current lake property owners, and
a reasonable request for the property considering its'location and expected usage.
I hope you will consider the merits of my request and approve the proposed variance for the
placement of the boat house.
Scott Murphy SCANNED
CL
:3
9
!9
A
OE
10-- -Iz I
w
mui
liAJ EL.
0 z
LLhi I
occ
z
(L
w
9�
lh
LLI
z
z
50AT�4OUSE ELEVATION F
1/4" . I. -Oil
SCANNED
CITY OFCHANR4SSEtq
RECEIVED
JUL 18 2014
CHANHASENRANNINODW
Murphy Boat House
L\%\- �'] "
50ATHOUSE ELEVATION C
1/4" . I.-Ol.
P*071�1'Lll 14-11
BOATPOUSE ELEVATION D
1/4" a 11-041
12
1 12
01TY0KHANHASSEN
RECEIVED
JUL '18 ?U14
CHANHASSEN PLANNING OEPT
July 17,2014
To: City of Chanhassen
Community Development Department
Planning Division
7700 Market Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
From: Ren Rutkus
Todd Moning
3860 Lone Cedar Lane
Chaska, MN 55318
We own the property directly adjacent to the proposed boat house building site. We
have reviewed the plans and the location of the proposed boat house for Scott and
Lori Murphy at 3880 Lone Cedar Lane, Chaska, MN 55318. We do not have any
concerns regarding construction of this structure next to our property and give our
consent and support for the proposed project without reservation.
Cordially,
Ren Rutkus
Monirg
I
SCANNED
CITY OKHANHASSU;
RECEIVED
JUL '1 6 ?014
CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEP7
3880 Lane Cedar Lane Variance - Planning Case 2014-20
$200.00 Variance
$200.00 Notification Sign
$54.00 Property Owners List
$50.00 Escrow for filing fees (Variance)
$504.00 TOTAL
$504.00 Less Check 10368 from Scott T. Murphy
$0.00 BALANCE
SCANNED
In9valson, Drew
From: Littfin, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:55 PM
To: Ingvalson, Drew
Subject: Planning case 2014-20, PID: 25-1700070, Boat house
Drew, I have reviewed the request for variance for the above project ( boat house) and have no issues or
concerns.
9YarkLittfin
Chanhassen Fire Marshal
7700 Market Blvd. PO box 147
Chanhassen MN. 55317
Direct 952.227.1151
Fax 952.227.1190
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen. MN 55317
Administration
Phone: 952.227.1100
Fax: 952.227.1110
Building Inspections
Phone: 952.227.1180
Fax: 952.227.1190
Engineering
Phone: 952.227.1160
Fax: 952.227.1170
Finance
Phone: 952.227.1140
Fax: 952.227.1110
Park & Recreation
Phone: 952.227.1120
Fax: 952.22T1110
Recreation Center
2310 Counter Bouievard
Phone: 952.227.1400
Fax: 952.227.1404
Planning &
Natural Resources
Phone: 952.227.1130
Fax: 952.227.1110
Public Works
7901 Park Place
Phone: 952.227.1300
Fax: 952.227.1310
SenlorCenter
Phone: 952.227.1125
Fax: 952.227.1110
Website
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us
L—
17311auTne TrATERM95
TO: Drew Ingvalson, Planning Intern
FROM: Jerritt Mohn, Building Official
DATE: July 23, 2014
SUBJ: Request for a Variance to the bluff setback to construct a water -oriented
structure on property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) and located
at 3880 Lone Cedar Lane.
Planning Case: 2014-20
I have reviewed the request for the above variance and have the following
comments:
1) Building Permit required.
2) Structure must comply with Minnesota State Building Code.
G \PLAN\2014 Pl�g C�\2014-20 3880 Lme Cedar Lane Variance\buildingofficialcon=erits.doc
Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
P 0 BOX 147
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
07/23/2014 11:06 AM
Receipt No. 00257682
CLERK: AshleyM
PAYEE: Scott Murphy
Lori Boettcher -Murphy
3880 Lone Cedar Lane
Chaska MN 55318-
3880 Lone Cedar Lane Planning Case 2014-20
-------------------------------------------------------
Variance 200.00
Notification Sign 200.00
Recording Fees 50.00
GIS List 54.00
Total
Cash
Check 10368
Change
-----------
504.00
0.00
504.00
-----------
0.00
SCANNED
Date: July 23, 2014
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MIN 55317
(952) 227-1100
To: Development Plan Referral Agencies
From: Planning Department
Review Response Deadline: August 6. 2014
By: Drew Ingvalson, Planning Intern (952) 227-1132
dingyalson(&ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Subject: Request for a Variance to the bluff setback to construct a water-oricrited structure on property zoned
Single Family Residential (RSF) and located at 3880 Lone Cedar Lane.
Applicant/Owner: Scott Murphy
Planning Case: 2014-20 PID: 25-1700070
The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning
Department on July 18, 2014. The 60 -day review period ends September 16, 2014.
In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and city council review, we would
appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and
proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites,
street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written
report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City
Council.
This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on August 19, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. in
the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than August 6,
2014. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is
greatly appreciated.
1. City Departments:
a. City Engineer
b. City Attorney
c. City Park Director
d. Fire Marshal
e. Building Official
E Water Resources Coordinator
g. Forester
2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District
3. MN Dept. of Transportation
4. MN Dept. of Natural Resources
5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife
7. Carver County
a. Engineer
b, Environmental Services
8. Watershed District Engineer
a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek
b. Lower Minnesota River
c- Minnehaha Creek
9. Telephone Company (Qwest or Sprint(United)
10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley)
11. Mediacom
12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco
SCANNED
Property Card
Taxpayer Information
Taxpayer Name
SCOTT T MURPHY
LORI ANN BOETTCHER
Mailing Address
3880 LONE CEDAR LN
CHASKA, MN 55318-9609
Property Address
Address
3880 LONE CEDAR LN
city
CHASKA, MN 55318
Uses
Tax Description
Parcel ID Number 251700070
Parcel Information
Res 1 unit GIS Acres 0.70
Tax Acres
Plat CEDAR CREST (CHAN)
Lot 007
Block 001
Building Style 2STORY
Year Built 2011
Building Information
Finished Sq Ft 4121 Bedrooms
Other Garage Y
Miscellaneous Information
Bathrooms
�1
3.25
School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve
0112 WS 062 MINNEHAHA CREEK Y N N
Assessor Information
Estimated Market Value 2013 Values 2014 Values Last Sale
(Payable 2014) (Payable 2015)
Land $418,800.00 $442,000.00 Date of Sale 08/28/2008
Building $665,700.00 $778,300.00 Sale Value $750,000.00
Total $1,084,500.00 $1,220,300-00 Qualified/ Q
Unqualified
Disclaimer Th:.smformation is to be used for reference purposes only. Carver County does not guarantee a=racy of the material
.untamed are and Is not responsible for misuse or misinterpretation. The preceding disclaimer Is provided pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 466.03, Sulbd� 21 (2000), and the user of this service acknowledges that the County shall not be liable for any damages, and
expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County fmm any and all claims brought by User,
CARVER its employees or agents. or third parties which ares out of the user's access or use of data provided.
COLTNITY
Wednesday, July 23, 2014 Carver Counly, MN Pap I of I
ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO.
5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (612) 474 7964 Fax (612) 474 8267
SURVEY FOR: COBBLESTONE HOMES INC.
SURVEYED: August, 2009 DRAFTED: August 4, 2009
REVISED: August 19, 2009, to show bluff line.
REVISED: November 17, 2009, to show proposed dwelling and related improvements.
REVISED: July 1, 2011, to show revised location and grading for proposed dwelling.
REVISED: August 2, 2011, to show revisions per city comments.
REVISED: August 12, 2011, to show further revisions per city comments.
REVISED: August 15, 2011, to show further revisions per city comments.
REVISED: August 15, 2011, to widen proposed drive out of right of way area.
REVISED: August 16, 2011, to show actual location and elev. of N. offset pipe.
REVISED: August 25, 2011, to show house lowered one foot and revised grading
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LIMITATIONS & NOTES:
1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal description. The scope of
our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the
legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make
sure that it is correct, and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish shown on the
survey, have been shown.
2. Showing the location of existing visible improvements.
3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monuments to mark the comers of the property.
4. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of
the site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that
benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the map when determining other
elevations for use on this site.
5. While we have shown your proposal to builQ a new home on this site with associated
improvements and grading, we are not as familiar with your plans as you and your architect are, so
please review the survey to make sure it accurately leflects what you want to build and where you
want to build it, and have any governmental agencies with jurisdiction over your project review the
survey to make sure they approve of the proposals shown, before you make any important decisions
about your project.
STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:
"a" Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing Sta
otherwise noted. ite License Number 9235, set, unless
CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, report or survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Engineer and
Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
H. Paiker P.E. & P. S. No. 923 5
CITY OF CfIAt,41A--_,SE1,I
"FECEOVE10
ALUG "1 5 Z011
WONEE-'11WO DEFT,
YV
JrS717YVC HMPCOVER F4RUZ47170
Lot
House
Concrete drive & walks
Paver Path
Steps
Ret. Wall
Shed
Total hardcover
Percentage hardcover
Allowable hardcover 25%
31,
020
sq.
ft.
1,
884
sq.
ft.
1,
340
s q.
f t.
312
528
sq.
ft.
sq.
115
s q.
ft.
ft.
34
sq.
ft.
216
48
sq.
ft.
3,
949
sq.
ft.
12.7%
7, 755 sq. ft.
Allowable h.c. expansion 3,806 sq. ft.*
*verify with City of Chanhassen
LEGEND
DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR LINE
DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE
DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
DENOTES PROPOSED DIRECTION OF
STORM WATER FLOW
DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE
9MMU'v
RIM ELEV.-988.5
PROPOSEP ffMPCOVER 7,74ffUZ,477101V
Lot
House
Front Porch and walk
Side stoops and stairs
Rear Porch/Deck/Stairs
Driveway
Paver Path
Steps
Proposed Shed
Total hardcover
Percentage hardcover
— — _960— — —
SF - SF
051e� �?;()"
w
05'�' 90�111r�io
juov 9,519
�O? 9 00 10 CJ9
�Lov
A021",
31,020
sq.
ft.
3,206
sq.
ft.
323
sq.
ft.
258
sq.
ft.
312
sq.
ft.
1146
sq.
ft.
528
sq.
ft.
115
sq.
ft.
216
sq.
ft.
6,004
sq.
ft.
19.4%
Olpe
MANHOLE: U
RIM ELEV.-923.4
Urr,�
3-
()P)v
2"00FOOT UTI�TY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
WIN LAT ... ----- --------
s ON P T OF TROLL GLENr ----------- --A %
--------- ------ MANHOLE AND EASEMENT LOCATION PER
MEASUREMENTS ON PLAT OF TROLLS GLEN
GRAPHIC SCALE
A
20 0 10 20
( IN FEET )
evalultilil aiid Cot recliol, for
prialafy b,".. ,
IN aCC01"I'lodale 10usp) Illay 1101
S Porch. A soil ev,1ItI,,1
0 r the C flon may be IC'CIUII,(1
ofistrUction of fLiture a(I(litioll.
'6 T, It
V�E STI G S ED,
(% BE N It
Motto N %
1P
Or,
Va
LIN
\N
1EITTING N E TEP�\
-20 FOOT WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
0 O\:?�4t\ PER DOC. NO. 19617
I n�s
'4100 ,
st,
X\\
TOE OF BLUFF LINE
956 CONTOUR '
ee-?\ VERIFY WITH CI\
PROPOSED HOUSE ELEVAOVMS
TOP FOUNDATION, 1�9�GE = 993.00
,go*
TOP OF FOUNDA, ri, SCREEN PORCH 994.98
TOP OF FOUNDY ION, MAIN H OUSE 995.30
66
GARAGE FLO 992. 1
LOW FLOOR 86�.6REEN PORCH
I ST SUB FLOO CREEN PORCH= R
I ST SUB FLO OR3 .16
MANHOLE.
RIM ELEV.-950\7
CITY OFCHANHASSE6j
RECEIVED
JIJI 1 8 ?014
CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT
-PX0. Yo. I_103eya
AD"NCE SURVEYING & ENGINEER-ING CO.
5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (612) 474 7964 Fax (612) 474 8267
SURVEY FOR: COBBLESTONE HOMES INC.
SURVEYED: August, 2009 DRAFTED: August 4, 2009
REVISED: August 19, 2009, to show bluff line.
REVISED: November 17, 2009, to show proposed dwelling and related improvements.
REVISED: July 1, 2011, to show revised location and grading for proposed dwelling.
REVISED: August 2, 2011, to show revisions per city comments.
REVISED: August 12, 2011, to show further revisions per city comments.
REVISED: August 15, 2011, to show ftirther revisions per city comments.
REVISED: August 15, 2011, to widen proposed drive out of right of way area.
REVISED: August 16, 2011, to show actual location and elev. of N. offset pipe.
REVISED: August 25, 2011, to show house lowered one foot and revised grading
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LIMITATIONS & NOTES:
1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal description. The scope of
our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the
legal description Wl—th your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make
sure that it is correct, and that any matters of record, such as casements, that you wish shown on the
survey, have been shown.
2. Showing the location of existing visible improvements.
3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monuments to mark the comers of the property.
4. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of
the site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that
benchmark and check at least one other feature ihown on the map when determining other
elevations for use on this site.
5. While we have shown your proposal to buil(l a new home on this site with associated
improvements and grading, we are not as familiar with your plans as you and your architect are, so
please review the survey to make sure it accurately leflects what you want to build and where you
want to build it, and have any governmental agencies with jurisdiction over your project review the
survey to make sure they approve of the proposals shown, before you make any important decisions
about your project.
STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:
"a" Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing Sta
otherwise noted. ite License Number 9235, set, unless
CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, report or survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Engineer and
Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
H. Paiker P.E. &P.S. No.
CI.TY OF CHANHA,�SEN
IRECEOVEIn
AW 2 5 ZO I I
FAGIINEE-RING DEFI,
PPR VED
DYE
P
A E.
T . x 2�5r I
a�]
5
E21-STIAIV 11z4RP60VEjV T4RU14T10yV
Lot
House
Concrete drive & walks
Paver Path
Steps
Ret. Wall
Shed
Total hardcover
Percentage hardcover
31r020
hardcover 25%
sq.
ft.
1,884
ft.
sq.
ft.
1 r
3 4 0
sq.
f t.
312
528
sq.
ft.
sq.
115
sq.
ft.
ft.
34
sq.
ft.
216
48
sq.
ft.
3,949
ft.
sq.
ft.
12.7%
Allowable
hardcover 25%
7,755
3,206
sq.
ft.
Allowable
h.c. expansion
3,806
258
sq.
ft.*
*verify with City of Chanhassen
LEGEND
DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR LINE
DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE
DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
DENOTES PROPOSED DIRECTION OF
STORM WATER FLOW
DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE
iffimn IV
RIM ELEV.-_988.6
710
PROPOSEP MEPI60 PEE F,4ff UL,4,7 YV
Lot
House
Front Porch and walk
Side stoops and stairs
Rear Porch/Deck/Stairs
Driveway
Paver Path
Steps
Proposed Shed
Total hardcover
Percentage hardcover
995.9---'
SF — SF
\4
V0
�O
, A;
00 ;�o
19 000 '�qj 11�
'10
�_ "* P,
C
VO
31,020
sq.
ft.
3,206
sq.
ft.
323
sq.
ft.
258
sq.
ft.
312
sq.
ft.
1146
sq.
ft.
528
sq.
ft.
115
sq.
ft.
216
sq.
ft.
6, 004
sq.
ft.
19.4%
1P
-OG
MANHOLE: k-)
RIM ELEV.-993.4
76
V)
20 FOOT UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
SHOWN ON PLAT OF TROLL GLEN� ------------- ----- --------- A
\1 --- ---------
� � �O Ccr�
--MANHOLE AND EASEMENT LOCATION PER
MEASUREMENTS ON PLAT OF TROLLS GLEN GRAPHIC SCALE
( IN FEET )
S
T�
evaluOtIOVI atid correctiol, for
S P
1411ary bujilli4j."
110t
\% arco 1,11 1110dI I
Isior.
Or
S POI`Ch. A SOil evaILIOlion Illy be r('(IL)ij,(!
0
I the Construction
B UtUre 1(1(lilioll.
_64' I G SUED
R r*O
rsp
It BE
Ilk '�N
q
>
Dt"
NO %
Ip
N
: V _:�� --- 20 FOOT WIDE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
5 N TINWO C\QN E 1E \ — ---- --
�01\ TCABE �ItA P� PER DOC. NO. 19617
�Eh$
1>
PROPOSED HOUSE ELEV S 1% _�%
TOP FOUNDATION GE 993.00
T
U
10
SE EL
N 9
EV
S "I' -'"%
E 36 0
�9 0
TOPOFFOUNDA SCREEN PORCH 994,.98
TOP FFO ND ON, MAIN HOUSE 995.30
GARAZE FULOQ = 992.66
LOW FLOOR = 8 6�.6
1 ST SUB FLOO CREEN PORCH
I ST SUB FLOOR, .16
Ip
MANHOLE_�
RIM ELEV_9 '7
E
91.
C�
It IS
CITY OF CHANHASWj
RSCEIVED
JUJ 1 8 ?0 14
CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEP;
-OX0. 2vo, -1-10336