Loading...
CAS-20_SEVER PETERSON DEVELOPMENT0 0 8 0 \N •` 1 FOI PEN C • �I PRIM Y CORRID - LINE (t24.55 AC.) TIT a I ,611-6FF CREEK • OVIMI-AY • DIST1141 T _ ••` WETLAND A,,N LOT 8 F f ` OT 7 ` 3 F L LOT 8 •� 1$306SF i�_► I L 0 2 T5 12L I � 2 . Y �• � 1 ' F• L ` � � 1 ,s-sao-s � \ <�I f/ LOT s� •1 ` F LO LOT 1 R PROPOSED TRUNK SEWER tiAi� I ��- E LOT 16 15t ■ ■ SEWER AC.) • I�� LOT 35 •LOT 34 1 •LOT 3B 6;i2iT'SF 11�'� ■ . 1 i 1, i 217 Lo670 F .J 1 Y , •�/ `/ LOT2 L' 30 1L.7m —• ; DiS RI T PR1N►�y .° `=v-9 .7.... Q,�-••'., ,. •l I�i•J'A/ •�� � • / � LOT 1 / ■ � ) :.' -�`�� ``�1�� � �� _ r` r/OOF/p-gp. 32 LOT 19 f / 28 `, \1 LOT 3 ' 2 . • ■ R PO - /•02 LOT 27 LOT 20 S �/ �t • ly• OT 22 LOT O22;d70-S� � \ \ ��_-•ate LINE y - 1 OT23 _�\' \ `� \ UTLOT #1 \ N� OF t TRAIL 1LOT2si \ MNDWQ T KI CORRIDOR �• SAJi?4 LINE (t5 6 C. •• '00.\ STING R.O. . \ ��^ OUTLOT �\ ZONE A\ _ ■ Or13�'L�� \ N /-� Duluth, MN \ Ham , YN Hibbangblas, UNRT .K Ylaaetonka, MN > uamrm LTD Phone: (952) 999-0972 Fax: M2) 999-1153 wwwzlk-ktiusisto.com ��llllri,, FUTURE HIGHWAY 212 TAKING LIMITS ZONE A I NT Peterson Development Concert A MSITE DATA PROPOSED RSF ZONING UNIT COUNT: 37 UNITS LAND AREA: ±39.8 ACRES (INCLUDES ±19.7 ACRES OF BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 0.93 UNITS/ACRE LOT REQUIREMENTS: 159000 SF MINIMUM LOT SIZE FRONT YARD SETBACK: 30 FEET REAR YARD SETBACK:30 FEET SIDE YARD SETBACK: 10 FEET MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE:90 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT: THREE (3) STORIES/FORTY (40) FEET PROPOSED R-4 ZONING UNIT COUNT: 36 UNITS LAND AREA: ±16.5 ACRES (INCLUDES f5.1 ACRES OF BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 2.18 UNITS/ACRE LOT REQUIREMENTS: 159000 SF MINIMUM LOT SIZE FRONT YARD SETBACK: 30 FEET REAR YARD SETBACK:30 FEET SIDE YARD SETBACK: 10 FEET MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE:50 FEET (TWO FAMILY) MAXIMUM HEIGHT: THREE (3) STORIES/FORTY (40) FEET PROPOSED R-8 ZONING UNIT COUNT: 42 UNITS LAND AREA: ±14.2 ACRES (INCLUDES f4.9 ACRES OF BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 2.95 UNITS/ACRE LOT REQUIREMENTS: 52500 SF MINIMUM LOT SIZE (TOWNHOMES) FRONT YARD SETBACK: 25 FEET REAR YARD SETBACK:25 FEET SIDE YARD SETBACK: 10 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT: THREE (3) STORIES/FORTY (40) FEET MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 150 FEET (TOWNHOMES) OUTLOT #1: f3.13 ACRES OUTLOT #2: f2.33 ACRES (OUTLOTS #1 AND #2 ARE NOT INCLUDED LEGEND OVERALL PARCEL IN THE ABOVE COMPUTATIONS) ® FLOOD ZONE A WETLAND LIMITS -.a- BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT (f29.71 AC.) BLUFF CREEK SECONDARY OVERLAY DISTRICT (f49.84 AC.) BLUFF CREEK - BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT 0 NET DEVELOPABLE AREA FLOOD ZONE A NOR2's PROPOSED MNDOT R.O.W. (PER MN/DOT DEC. 2004) 7 ® EXCLUDING EXISTING PIONEER TRAIL R.O.W. (f43.12 AC.) 0 200 400 FXIgTINC. WFTI ANn (+n F9 Ar 1 Chanhassen, MN Date: June 3, 2005 6110 Blue Circle Dr.- Suite /100- Minnetonka, lIN 55343 C� r L-A CITY OF 7700 Markel Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax:952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone:952.227.1140 Fax 952227.1110 Park l Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us January 12, 2006 Mr. Sever Peterson Peterson Jacques Farm LLC 15900 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Re: Development Notification Sign Escrow Refund Peterson Bluff - Case No. 05-20 Dear Mr. Peterson, Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $100 which represents a refund of the development notification sign escrow for the above -referenced project. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 952-227-1107 or by email at kmeuwissen@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Sincerely, Kim T. Meuwissen Planning Secretary KTM:ms Enclosure SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. n U Vendor: Severin Peterson Jr Vendor No: PeteSeve Invoice Number Date DW6259 Ol/06/2006 Vendor Acet No: Description Return -sign escrow Check Date: 01/12/2006 Check Amount: $100.00 Invoice Amount 100.00 CITY OF CHANHASSEN M&I MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK 127992 7700 MARKET BLVD.. P.O. BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 17 115910 (952)227-1140 Pay: ***One hundred dollars and Zero cents Date 01/12/2006 To the order of: Severin Peterson Jr THE REVERSE S1DE OF THIS DOCUMENT INCLUDES AN ARTIFICIAL WATERMARK- NOLD AT AN ANGLE TO VIEW Amount $ 100.00 .r.IL1717- CITY OF CHANHASSEN • 7700 MARKET BLVD MN 55317 • Payee: SEVERIN PETERSON JR Date: 06/23/2005 Time: 8:43am Receipt Number: DW / 6259 Clerk: DANIELLE CONCEPT PUD 05-20 ITEM REFERENCE AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- DEVAP CONCEPT PUD 05-20 USE & VARIANCE 750.00 SIGN RENT 75.00 SIGN ESCROW 100.00 Total: Check 8066 Change: --------------- 925.00 925.00 --------------- 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! Return Check to Kim for mailing with letter. OK to return sign escrow. Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Date MEMORANDUM CITY OF TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager CHMSEN 7700 Market Boulevard FROM: Kate Aanenson AICP, Community Development Director PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN55317 DATE: August 8, 2005 a K Administration Phone:952227.1100 SUBJ: Peterson Bluff Fax: 952.227.1110 l Building Inspections EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax:952.227.1190 Conceptual PUD of 71 acres of property for 120 residential units — Peterson Bluff Engineering ACTION REQUIRED QUIRD' D Fax: 952.227.1170 City Council approval requires a 4/5 of the entire City Council. Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY Park a Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on Jul 19,2005, to review the g P g Y Fax: 952.227.1110 proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend Recreation Center approval with the conditions in the staff report. The summary and verbatim 2310 Coulter Boulevard minutes are item la of the City Council packet for August 8, 2005. Phone: 952227.1400 Fax 952.227.1404 RECOMMENDATION Planning A Natural Resources Staff recommends adoption of the motion approving the Conceptual PUD Phone:952227.1130 Fax:952.227.1110 approval as specified in the staff report dated Jul 19, 2005. PP P P Y Public works ATTACHMENTS 1591 Pads Road Phone:952.227.1300 Fax:95M7.1310 Planning Commission Staff Report Dated July 19, 2005. Senior Center Phone:952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.dwhassen.mn.us The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: PC DATE: July 19, 2005 I5 CC DATE: August 8, 2005 REVIEW DEADLINE: August 16, 2005 CASE #: 05-20 BY: Aanenson Conceptual PUD of 71 acres of property for 120 residential units — Peterson Bluff. 1600 Pioneer Trail J. Edwin Chadwick, LLC 11430 Zion Circle Bloomington, MN 55347 PRESENT ZONING: A2, Agricultural Estate Peterson Jacques Farm LLC 15900 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Office/Industrial, Residential Medium Density, and Parks and Open Space ACREAGE: 71 acres — gross; 41.5 acres — net / DENSITY: 1.7 units/acre — gross; 2.9 units/acre — net SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Concept Planned Unit Development Approval for a mixed residential development. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City has a high level of discretion in approving rezoning, PUD's and land use amendments because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning or PUD must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sever Peterson is requesting to change the land use recommendation and the zoning of his property. Mr. Peterson has owned this property for four decades. The timing of the development of this area is driven by the improvements of Highway 212/312 and the City's comprehensive plan which anticipates that this area be developed between 2005-2010. The current land use on this site is Office/Industrial or Residential -Medium Density. The applicant request is for Residential -Low Density. This would require a land use amendment and rezoning. After conceptual approval, the applicant would have to pursue a Land Use Amendment, Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD), Conditional Use Permit for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay DiCandipproval. The applicant is seeking cozoning approval.A PUD ' being requested because there will be a mix of low d types. The site is in the uff Creek Overlay district. The tool that the City has to out of the prim strict is the PUD. As per the PUD ordinance, "approval tatement of obligate the City to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone a property to a planned unit development district." The purpose of the concept plan is to outline the issues that the applicant will have to further develop in order to proceed with preliminary subdivision and rezoning to PUD. Staff has been working with the City's consultant on the AUAR road and utilities plan. There have been four meetings with the property owners in the area to review the design alternatives. It is the City's goal to have the infrastructure design approved by the City Council and the project ordered later this summer. Since the Peterson plan has been submitted, a ifterent road alignment has been advanced. BACKGROUND Concept PUD - What is required? The intent of the concept plan is to get an early read from the commission and council without incurring a lot of expensive. Following are the requirements for conceptual PUD approval. Sec. 20-517 General Concept Plan. Chanhassen City Code (a) The general concept plan for a PUD provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to the city showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without incurring substantial cost. The plan shall include the following: (1) Overall gross and net density. (2) Identification of each lot size and lot width. (3) General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. (4) General location and extent of public and common open space. (5) General location and type of land uses and intensities of development. (6) Staging and time schedule for development. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 3 (b) The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be filed with the city before the staff commences review. Approval of the concept statement shall not obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district. (c)The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures: (1) The developer meets with the city staff to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan, together with all supporting data. (3) The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and report its findings and make recommendations to the city council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official news- paper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days prior thereto to owners of land within five hundred (500) feet of the boundary of the property and an on -site notification sign erected. (4) Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning commis- sion, the city council shall consider the proposal. If the planning commission fails to make a report within sixty (60) days after receipt of the application, then the city council may proceed without the report. The council may approve the concept plan and attach such conditions, as it deems reasonable. Approval shall require a four -fifths vote of the entire council. Alternative Urban Areawide Review The conceptual approval of Town and Country required an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Rather than completing an EAW on just their site, an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was undertaken for the entire 2005 MUSA (Lower Bluff Creek) Metropolitan Urban Service Area. In reviewing the Lower Bluff Creek in a holistic setting, there were specific mitigation strategies that were established and they are listed below. Attached are the Complete Mitigation Initiatives. All of the recommendations are being incorporated in the design of the Lower Bluff Creek area. All property with the Lower Bluff Creek area will be assessed for the cost of the AUAR on a per acreage basis. The assessment for the AUAR will be paid at the time of plat recording. Specific strategies: I. All permits identified in the AUAR (See question #8), as well as other necessary permits that may be required, will be secured by the City, or private parties as appropriate, for all development activities within the project area. 2. The City will follow its own regulations, ordinances, plans, and policies currently in place in the review and approval of all development activities within the project area. These items include The 2020 Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the official zoning and subdivision ordinances and the Bluff Creek Overlay ordinance. In addition, the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan, the Surface Water Management Plan, the Public Water Supply and Distribution System Plan (currently being revised) and the Comprehensive Sewer Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 4 Policy Plan will be used as technical resources in reviewing development activities and developing associated public infrastructure. 3. The City will extend public sewer and water services in a manner consistent with existing plans and policies for delivering trunk sanitary sewer service and watermain systems. Abandonment and closure of individual well and septic systems will follow existing local and state regulations. 4. The City will work with Mn/DOT and Carver County to periodically monitor traffic as generated from development within the project area as well as regional development initiatives that will affect the project area. Regional roadway improvements such as TH 2121312 and improvements to County Roads (Audubon Rd., Lyman Blvd., Pioneer Trail and future Powers Blvd. extension) will alter travel patterns. Performing traffic counts and monitoring traffic movements will help in facilitating future local roadway improvements. 5. The City will provide for adequate regional and local stormwater ponds and trunk facilities to protect water resources and water quality as guided by the Storm Water Management Plan and Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan. [National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase Il with individual site development] 6. The City will implement a development tracking mechanism to monitor development within the AUAR Project Area and its conformance with the development scenario. 7. The City will enforce its parkland dedication practices consistent with the goals and policies outlined in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan and the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan and the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. The City will follow existing zoning regulations including Floodplain Overlay (Article V), Wetland Protection (Article VI), Shoreland Management (Article VH), Bluff Protection (Article XXVIII) and Bluff Creek Overlay (Article XXXI) to protect natural and environmental resources from potential impacts resulting from the Development Scenario. The City will reference policies and strategies outlined in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan and Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan as technical resources during the review of specific development projects. ANALYSIS Rezoning — Land Use Rezoning of this property to PUD-R low density would be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. A land use amendment would be required. Approval of the land use amendment is subject to the Metropolitan Council approval. Staff support of the land use amendment is contingent upon maintaining approximately the same land use type percentages in the 2005 MUSA area. To date, there may be a request to locate industrial in the northeast portion of the site. With the update of the comprehensive plan in 1998, this property was given the two land use alternatives: Residential -Medium Density or Office/Industrial, as well as parks and open space Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 5 within the Bluff Creek Corridor. The reason it was given both potential land uses was that the site has been and is farmed and was adjacent to the Benardi (Town and County) property which was similarly guided. In calculating the City's 2020 land use designations, this 80-acre site was calculated at 50 percent industrial and 50 percent medium density residential. (The City's 2020 land use for industrial zoning was estimated at 1,229 acres (based on the change by Town and Country) or 8.3 percent of ultimate industrial. If this site were to be developed as all low density residential, there would 20 acres less of industrial land or a reduction from 1,209 or a percentage reduction of .015 percent to 8.1 percent. Based on the developer's calculations of net developable land (41.4 acres) with a maximum of 8 units an acre, the maximum number of units could be 332. The proposal is for 119 units which would yield a net density of 2.9 units an acre. According to the City Comprehensive Plan, net density less than 4 units an acre is low density. The current subdivision layout does not reflect the proposed alignment of the east west collector (Bluff Creek Boulevard). The road location may alter the property dwelling unit types. The proposed house types include 37 single-family homes, 34 twin homes and 48 quad homes. Land Use Commercial Office/Industrial Office Parks & Open Space Public/Semi-Public Residential Large Lot Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Mixed Use Undevelopable TOTALS 2020 Land Use Plan Existine Proposed Change % of Total 212 212 0 1.4% 1,229* 1,209 -20 8.1 % 117 117 0 .8% 1,466 1,466 0 9.9% 1,242 1,242 0 8.8% 2,247 2,247 0 15.2% 5,473 5,493 +20 37.2% 669* 669 0 4.5% 398 398 0 2.6% 134 134 0 .9% 1,573 1,573 0 10.6% 14,760 acres 14,760 acres - 100% * adjusted based on the request from Town and Country Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 6 Chanhassen 2005 AUAR Project Magnitude Data LAND USE TOTAL NET PERCENTAGE MAXIMUM PROJECT DESIGNATION DEVELOPABLE OF INTENSITY OF MAGNITUDE ACRES LAND USE DEVELOPMENT DATA Medium Density 8 du/acre 528-1056 units Residential/Low 132 38 % Density Residential Medium Density 66 18% 8 du/acre 528 units Residential Office 17 5% 0.35 FAR 270,00 square feet Office/Industrial 70 20% 0.30 FAR 920,500 square feet Bluff Creek 45 13% Primary Zone Park 20 6% park Net Acres Total350 100% x Any District 112 school has been eliminated from the 2005 MUSA Bluff Creek Overlay District The Bluff Creek Corridor Study is a vision and planning document that has the following goals: 1. Protection, Restoration and Enhancement of Natural Resources. 2. Acquire land to create a continuous greenway along the creek from the Minnesota River to Lake Minnewashta. 3. Create development standards that manage upstream development such as mixed or cluster development, conservation easements and alternative zoning. 4. Develop educational watershed awareness program. 5. Develop a Natural Resources Plan. An overlay district was created for Bluff Creek with a primary and secondary corridor. The primary corridor boundary delineates a conservancy zone where undistributed conditions are desired. This is the area where any type of development and/or human activity directly impacts the morphological and biological characteristics of Bluff Creek. The secondary corridor boundary delineates a management zone. This is the area where development and/or urban activities directly affect the stream's upland ecosystem. The preservation and enhancement of this area will result in a better habitat and less strain on the stream. Management practices for this area focus on the preservation and enhancement of upland vegetation and the reduction of peak flows. This parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The primary and secondary corridor boundaries and the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor are not shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the primary and secondary corridors and the setback. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. The grading plan should be revised to eliminate alterations within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All structures must meet the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 7 STREETS The proposed street alignments shown on the concept plan are generally consistent with the recommended alignments identified in "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The concept plan identifies the TH 212 alignment as well as the east -west collector road that will ultimately connect Audubon Road (CSAH 15) to the proposed extension of Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17). Kimley-Horn has slightly modified the alignment of the portion of the east -west collector road through the Peterson property. The preliminary plat plans must incorporate the updated alignment of the east -west collector street and the proposed roundabout. The concept plan also identifies a "South Connector Roadway" that will connect the east -west collector to Pioneer Trail, consistent with the Report. The trunk roadway improvements described above shall be financed according to the recommendations within the Report, which includes special assessments that will be levied against this property. Right-of-way and street widths are not identified on the plan and will be reviewed with the preliminary plat submittal. Turn lane requirements and the typical street section shown in preliminary plans must be consistent with the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" recommendations. UTILITIES Trunk and lateral sanitary sewer and watermain improvements are required with the proposed project_ A preliminary utility plan must be submitted with the preliminary plans and must comply with the trunk sanitary sewer and watermain design shown in the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report". Trunk sanitary sewer to serve the proposed subdivision shall extend from the existing trunk sanitary sewer located at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) and Audubon Road. The proposed trunk sanitary sewer between Lyman Boulevard and the proposed east -west collector road will be constructed by the City in conjunction with the 2005 MUSA Expansion Project, City Project #04-05. Trunk watermam improvements include the proposed IT' trunk watermain along Pioneer Trail, which will be constructed with the TH 212 design -build project. The "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" also specifies that 12" watermain be installed within the east -west collector road and within the "South Connector Roadway". Trunk utility improvements shall be financed according to the recommendations within the 2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report", which includes special assessments that will be levied against this property. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 8 A pressure reducing valve is required within the development and must be shown on the preliminary utility plan. The City will reimburse the developer for the cost to furnish and install the pressure reducing valve. The City will also reimburse the developer the oversizing cost between the 12" trunk watermain and an 8" lateral watermain. The preliminary utility plan must include lateral storm sewer to service the proposed development. It will be the developer's responsibility to install and finance the installation of lateral watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer to serve the units within the proposed development. All proposed trunk and lateral utilities shall meet the City's minimum design requirements. GRADING Town & Country's proposed Liberty on Bluff Creek development lies west of the proposed Peterson Bluff PUD. The developer's engineer must work with Town & Country's engineer to minimize the amount and/or height of retaining walls to the maximum extent possible. BUILDING AND FIRE COMMENTS 1. The attached single-family townhome buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system if they are over 8,500 sq. ft. in floor area. For the purposes of this requirement, property lines do not constitute separate buildings and the area of basements and garages is included in the floor area threshold. 2. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire - resistive construction. 3. Each unit/lot must be provided with separate utility services. 4. Complete proposed site, grading and utility plans must be submitted to determine more detailed requirements. PARKS The Sever Peterson farm represents one of the properties located within the 2005 MUSA area that is currently being considered for development. The Peterson farm is situated on Bluff Creek and is proposed to be developed into residential housing. The number of units to be built is yet unknown, but initial estimates total 115 homes. The City's Comprehensive Park Plan calls for one acre of usable park space to be set aside for every 75 residents. The Peterson housing development will result in an estimated 300 new residents. In this scenario, the City's Comprehensive Plan would call for a four -acre park to be preserved and developed on this property. However, the Comprehensive Plan also recognizes that building a small park in every single family addition is undesirable and would result in an Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 9 unmanageable municipal park system. To this end, the plan calls for neighborhood parks to be centrally located within housing regions with a maximum distance of one mile between neighborhood parks. This pooling of resources and land in order to centrally locate parks in specific park service areas results in the efficient use of limited capital and long-term maintenance dollars. In the case of the Peterson Farm, the City is planning to service neighborhood park needs at a location directly north and across Bluff Creek from the farm. Therefore, it is anticipated that the City will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication on the Peterson parcel. A variety of pedestrian improvements will be incorporated into the Peterson development. Foremost is a ten -foot wide asphalt trail to be constructed within and paralleling the Bluff Creek Corridor. This important trail will most likely be constructed on the north side of Bluff Creek at this location. Additional pedestrian trails, sidewalks and trail connectors will be incorporated into the project as required.. The planning and construction of these pedestrian improvements will, in most cases, be managed as private improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES li7 N FYIWIT) Existing Wetlands A wetland delineation has not been submitted for the proposed project site. A report documenting the delineation of jurisdictional wetlands in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual must be submitted to the City as soon as possible. Wetland Replacement If wetland impacts are proposed, a wetland sequencing and mitigation plan must be submitted. Wetland replacement must occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. A wetland buffer 20 to 30 feet in width (with a minimum average of 20 feet) must be maintained around all Natural wetlands. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures must be set back 40 feet from the edge of the wetland buffer. The wetland buffer setback should be shown on the plans. BLUFFS Any areas on the property that meet the City's criteria for bluffs (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe) must be preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 10 bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT The City of Chanhassen established the Bluff Creek Overlay District by ordinance in 1998 to protect the Bluff Creek Corridor, wetlands, bluffs and significant stands of mature trees through the use of careful site design and other low -impact practices. This parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The primary corridor boundary and the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor are not shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the primary corridor and the setback. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All structures must meet the 40- foot setback from the primary corridor. A conditional use permit will be required for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District corridor. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL Storm Water Management The concept plan does not show storm water management infrastructure. Storm water from the site shall be treated to National Urban Runoff Protection (NURP) standards. Post -development storm water discharge rates must not exceed pre -development rates. Easements Drainage and utility easements with a minimum width of 20 feet shall be provided over all utilities and drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as PVC and storm water infrastructure. Erosion and Sediment Control A complete Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) must be in place before applying for and receiving NPDES construction permit coverage from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Minimization of the amount of exposed soils on the site is needed; phasing of the development is recommended to limit the disturbed areas open. The creek and ravine systems throughout the development capture runoff from the erosive soils and significant slopes in some areas. Silt fence as the primary sediment control will not be sufficient. Surface Water Management Fees Based on approximately 39.8 acres at the medium density residential water quality and water quantity rates, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $245,009. Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (dewatering permit), Army Corps of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 11 This site's agricultural use over the years has resulted in wooded areas existing along the edges of fields and in wetter areas. Nearly all the existing woods fall within the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Corridor. These areas will receive protection and help create an attractive buffer for the development as well as protect Bluff Creek. Landscaping requirements for the Peterson development include: 1. Based on the existing canopy coverage for the site, the developer will need to meet minimum planting requirements. 2. Bufferyard planting will be required along the south and west property lines. 3. Landscaping for the attached housing area should include native species for overstory and foundation plantings as well as non-native, ornamental selections. 4. Large groupings of materials will help extend the natural areas into the developed sites and create privacy for residents. S. A strong, boulevard tree planting element is recommended within the development and required along any collector roads. RECOMMENDATION � Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motion: f "The Chanhassen City Council recommends approval the Concept PUD with /the fallowing cuse onditions: f Z6A .10 U /i✓ and y du d u� lchhaanges o Resid tial �edanother prop �� 2. Implementation of the AUAR recommendations. 3. The preliminary plat plans must incorporate the updated alignment of the east -west collector street and the proposed roundabout. 4. Turn lane requirements and the typical street section shown in preliminary plans must be consistent with the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" recommendations. 5. A preliminary utility plan must be submitted with the preliminary plans and must comply with the trunk sanitary sewer and watermain design shown in the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report". 6. A pressure reducing valve is required within the development and must be shown on the preliminary utility plan. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 12 7. The preliminary utility plan must include lateral storm sewer to service the proposed development. 8. The developer's engineer must work with Town & Country's engineer to minimize the amount and/or height of retaining walls to the maximum extent possible. 9. The attached single-family townhome buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system if they are over 8,500 sq. ft. in floor area. For the purposes of this requirement property lines do not constitute separate buildings and the area of basements and garages is included in the floor area threshold. 10. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire - resistive construction. 11. Each unit/lot must be provided with separate utility services. 12. Complete proposed site, grading and utility plans must be submitted to determine more detailed requirements. 13. The City will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication on the Peterson parcel. 14. A report documenting the delineation of jurisdictional wetlands in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual must be submitted to the City. 15. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. A wetland buffer 20 to 30 feet in width (with a minimum average of 20 feet) must be maintained around all Natural wetlands. 16. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. 17. All structures must be set back 40 feet from the edge of the wetland buffer. The wetland buffer setback should be shown on the plans. 18. Any areas on the property that meet the City's criteria for bluffs (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe) must be shown on the plans and preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). 19. The primary corridor boundary and the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor are not shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the primary corridor and the setback. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 13 20. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All structures must meet the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor. 21. Based on the existing canopy coverage for the site, the developer will need to meet minimum planting requirements. 22. Bufferyard planting will be required along the south and west property lines. 23. Landscaping for the attached housing area should include native species for overstory and foundation plantings as well as non-native, ornamental selections. 24. Large groupings of materials will help extend the natural areas into the developed sites and create privacy for residents. 25. A strong, boulevard tree planting element is recommended within the development and required along any collector roads. 26. The development should establish viewsheds to be preserved as part of the development." ATTACHMENTS 1. Submittal letter and application. 2. Public hearing notice and property owners list. 3. Map of 2005 MUSA (see staff report attachment for Liberty on Bluff Creek). 4. Map of Land Use alternatives. 5. MnDOT letter dated June 30, 2005. 6. Development Concept A. gAplan\2005 planning cns \05-20 petmm bluff petmon bluff pud cmceptdoc CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION PLEASE PRINT Applicant Name Phone: f5.2-8.r'?-.tY7s Fax: 95',2- "c-oY9z Email: reuspgrje-aA c cew. Comprehei isive Plan Amendment Conditiona Use Permit Interim Us Permit Non-confo ing Use Permit Conte .4- Planned U it Development' i Rezoning Sign Perm is Sign Plan eview Site Plan 1view* Planning Case No. Owner Namo ­4 • -' ' - Pekersa.. Sac�.es , LLe- /S6/0. 4 Dr Ede P n.'rr's H+n/ .i -.1'3 ley Contact: Pe-j-r.r.. Phone: ?SJ-9 3 7-isnFax: 9J'2- 937 i-r9d' Email:. s 1pa&r-!oos Dc.e/. cap Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign" - $75 + $100 Damage Deposit X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost"' - $50 CUP/SPR/VAC/VAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ as00 - An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. Twenty-six (26) full- ize folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8'/2" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital opv in TIFF -Group 4 ('.tif) format. " Applicant to obtain r otification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material sa ples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multi le applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT NAME: Pe4v. LOCATION: K'o.l ee c KO. J ad now LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PO4c.as E 1,y n� /l16 y Z7 r//1.N R?3w C..A ye cftL^e W �y N w 1y Se//6.v 2 vt3 Lj TOTAL ACREAGE:j /iaPIc61 /2-0 /0 -LC 4.1441,,.E 740 act r WETLANDS PRESENT: X_ YES NO PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: law a.1 the d,., a(#,+j,f y rC5 je.4.; / PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: r,Gd 'K.. da • s� /ei /a 4' I p�i a/ ,/ �! i �fosco , i REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: Le /. fie d,'n., dear• vc�; d e• /•` / 1 �_r�,,c�, REASON FOR REQUEST: 7A4 a Do �•'c. < he• lr �o a ccgA 4(, p/e jXt r r{_6 E-�✓ C. e ad A+f Grca�lng p(p'If /o/oni 91,1 e%ercure.,r e 144 c s1 e This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Date ��� Date SCANNED GiplanVo"s\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 4/e5 J. EDWIN CHADWICK, LLC 11430 Zion Grck Land and Farms - alooruing[on, Minnesor: 55437 Office (952) 853-2473 FAX (952) 886-0492 May 31, 2005 Ms. Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen,,MN 55317 Peterson/Jacques Farm Information Letter Concept PUD Application to follow Dear Ms. Aanenson: This information letter is coming forth at this time after two -years of deliberation and extensive work with city staff, MNDOT and the AUAR team. Timing The letting of the Trunk Highway 212 project and the rapid design/build process being undertaken by the contractor makes this a very time sensitive project. Additionally, the AUAR study has,been completed over the last couple of years, the feasibility report for infrastructure for the area is in place and there is a natural synergy of timely land planning and construction in concert with the large Highway 212. The City has indicated that there is a desire to undertake the East West Collector Street and bridge project shortly as well. Clearly the time is now. Ownership Background The property is owned by Mr. Sever Peterson and has a long history with the Peterson family. Mr. Peterson, has owned the farm for four decades and been farming it even longer, having worked with the thrashing crew as a boy assisting his father and grandfather: Due to this long attachment to this parcel of land, Mr. Peterson wants to see a style of development which is sensitive to the existing natural features and takes full advantage of the spectacular views on the site. Existing Land Use The site is currently a mix of farming uses and natural open space adjacent to and including parts of the Primary Bluff Creek Overlay Area. The topography has beautiful rolling hills and is one of the highest points in Chanhassen, resulting in spectacular views at many locations on the site. Adiacent Land Use The land to the west of the site is where Town and Country Homes, Inc. has proposed the Liberty Development, which is a neighborhood of approximately 350 mid -density residential townhomes. The land to the north of the Peterson farm is under contract with Pemtom and is intended for housing. The land to the east of the Peterson farm is controlled by Town and Country Homes, Inc. and is intended for residential development. The land to the south is part of the 2015 and 2020 MUSA expansion areas and also includes the soon-to=be-constructed Highway 212. This area is also near one of the possible new CR 41 river crossing corridors, however, the impact of that potential project is questionable at this time due to the uncertainty of its final location and that the project is unfunded and therefore will likely not occur until after 2020, which should be long after full development of the 2005 MUSA has occurred. Access to Infrastructure . The East-West Collector will run through the Peterson property in the northwest comer. This project calls for a nice sweeping boulevard and installation of sewer and water and is intended to start in 2005 or early 2006. The second major- roadway improvement will be the road labeled in the AUAR as the Southern Connector Road which will run from the new East-West Collector to Pioneer Trail. Proposed Land Use The proposal is a residential planned unit development (PUD) on approximately 67 acres that is in concert with the residential component that is called forth by the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. The current guidance calls for development of 4-8 units per acre of housing and although the ultimate density is still being worked out in design, we anticipate it will be at the lower end of that density range. This reduced density is due in large part to the constraints of the topography and soils and also due to the desire to preserve and enhance the access to the existing natural resources and views. We want to work with the existing . topography. and resources rather than over -engineer the site and destroy much of its unique and special character. Issues of density transfer of units that could be built within Bluff Creek Overlay##1 but must be relocated out of the Primary, district will be worked out over time with City Staff. The East=West Collector and Southern Collector roads are proposed to be utilized as buffers between areas of higher and lower densities. Higher densities are proposed on the west side of the site to remain compatible with the adjacent Town and CountryHomes, Inc. proposed development and then the density drops off significantly as the topography rises in the east and adjacentto the Bluff Creek Overlay Area , Our engineer. did" look at the suitability of the topography and soils for non- residential purposes and determined that. much of the site was unsuitable for non- residential uses due to topography and soil constraints. That report has been provided to City staff. The Peterson Family would be disappointed if this beautiful site was turned into a sea of parking lots, loading docks and retaining walls. Housing Product Types The land use design would call for three residential product types of varying size and density. The centerpiece of the project is an area of large lot executive home sites which would be overlooking or adjacent to the beautiful Bluff Creek Valley. These homes can be some of the premier homes in the area. There are more 20 acres of the Bluff Creek Park nature area which will preserved as part of this development and thesehomes will have wonderful views of Us amenity as well as a view from the top of Chanhassen. The area west of the Southern Connector Road will be an area of 2-4 unit . buildings which will provide a. nice.transition between Town and Country s offering to the west and the generous single-family homes to east. The area north of the East-West. Collector and on the western side of the parcel which would be contiguous with Town and Country will have a higher density. townhome product which would be similar to what is being offered by Town and Country in area immediately adjacent to it. This area would likely be physically connected to the Town and Country project through the extension of Town and. Country's local street system. If the Town and Country project ends up reducing density adjacent to this area, it could be redesigned for more executive homes due to its proximity to the Bluff Creek Overlay, and terrain. We look forward to receiving input -from the City regarding this proposal so that we can then move forward with the more detailed design information that will be needed for the City Engineers final roadway design on the East-West Collector and related infrastructure projects. Sincerely, E. Chadwick nclosure I LL IQ 0 Q o T (9 � J VI � (0 m of C fQ C U CL0- CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on July 7, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Peterson Bluff Concept PUD — Planning Case 05-20 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of J l Llit , 2005. �. Notary =ary ' N My 10 Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Unit Development — Peterson Proposal: Bluff Planning File: 05-20 Applicant: J. Edwin Chadwick, LLC Property 1600 Pioneer Trail Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952-227-1139 Questions & or e-mail kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at htto://206.10.76.6/webl1nk7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application In writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation, The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallindustrial. • Minnesota State Statute si 9.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding Its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersontrepresentative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested personis). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be Included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have somethIno to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Hato Jt. Timn• I Tirwgriav .liAv iq_ 2009 at 7:00 D.m. t] This map is neither a legaly recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information ano data located in various city, county, stale and federal offices and other samres regarding die area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not wamMt that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Cafe used to prepare this nap are error tree, and the City does not represent that Me GIS Dow can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting rrsesummenl of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic featuresIf eiors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-11 W. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Hnnesota Statutes §466.03, Sum. 21 (2000), and to user of this map ecknowtedges Met Me City shag not be liable for any damages, and exprewy waives all claim, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hdtl harmless Me City from any and all chums brought by User, its employees or agents, or Mind pardes which arse out of the useh access or use ol data provided. ❑07 This map is neither a legally moortfed map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This crap is a compitatim of recom, inforvatiw and data located in various city, county, state ant faders offices and other sources regarding the area shown. and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant Mat Me Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and Me City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of anstarrioe or direction or precision in Me depictor of geographic features. ff enors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding diwlairner is provided pursuant to Minnesota Stables §466.03, Sum. 21 (2000). and the user of this map acknOWa ages that the Guy shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives el clans. and agrees to defend, indemnity, and hold hairless the City from any and all claims brought by User, Os a,ryloyees or agents, or third cartes which arse ad of the users access or use of data provided. «NAME,) NAMED) «AD D1 >) «ADD2)) "CITY,, «STATE» «ZIP))-«ZIP4» «Next Record)),,NAME,> c,NAME1,) r,ADD1 11ADD2>> „CITY» «STATE» 12IP>)-„2IP4» GAYLE O & LOIS J DEGLER AURORA INVESTMENTS LLC FOX PROPERTIES LP TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 5215 EDINA INDUST BLVD 1630 LYMAN BLVD SUITE 100 EXCELSIOR, S IOR , MN 5 RD CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9402 MINNEAPOLIS , MN 55439 -3023 EXCELSIOR , MN 55331 -7911 PETERSONJACOUES FARM LAND CO C/O SEVERIN H PETERSON JR 15900 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347 -4047 G&M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP 24760 CEDAR POINT RD NEW PRAGUE , MN 56071 -4056 NDI MINNESOTA LLC C/O HOVSTONE PROPERTIES MN LLC 7615 SMETANA LN SUITE 160 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346 -4700 ARTHUR B JOHNSON 17448 FRONDELL CT EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347 -3416 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG ST PAUL , MN 55155 -1801 KLINGELHUTZ CONSTRUCTION CO 350 HWY 212E CHASKA . MN 55318 -2144 BLUFF CREEK GOLF ASSOC CITY OF CHASKA DAMES W HEISEL 1025 CREEKWOOD DR C/O NOEL GRACZYK C/O C/O EAST HWY 212 CHASKA , MN 55318 -9647 1 CITY HALL PLAZA 3PO 5 BOX 89 CHASKA , MN 55318 -1962 CHASKA , MN 55318 -0089 Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 June 30, 2005 Ms. Kate Aaneson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317-1447 SUBJECT: Peterson Farm Mn/DOT Review # S05-063 New TH 212 corridor, North side, East of CSAH 17 Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section: 1010 Dear Ms. Aaneson: MOW JUL 0 1 20U5 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Thank you for submitting the above referenced site plan. Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the Peterson Farm Site Plan, and have the following comments. The proposed development will need to maintain existing drainage rates. The City or project developer will need to submit before/after hydraulic computations for both 10 and, IOQ year rainfall events verifying that all existing drainage patterns and systems affecting Mn/DOT right of way will be perpetuated. Stormwater ponds adjacent to Mn/DOT right-of-way shall be designed to a 100-year-24-hour storm event with 2 feet of freeboard. Please direct questions concerning these issues to Julie Whitcher (651-634-2080) of Mn/DOT's Water Resources section. ( Julie.whitcher(adot.state.mn.us ) Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsuv/utility . Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Keith Van Wagner (651-582-1443), or Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Review Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's 30-day review and response process to development proposals. If you happen to An equal opportunity employer know the property identification number, please include that information with your submittals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions, please feel free to call myself at 651-634-2083, or Tod Sherman at 651-582-1548. l Voigt Transportation Planner Copy: Dave Drealan, Carver County Planning Department \j \ \\6 �2A! � � Q d k C'n k � k k .* CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: PC DATE: July 19, 2005 CC DATE: August 8, 2005 REVIEW DEADLINE: August 16; 2005 CASE #: 05-20 / BY: Aanenson Conceptual PUD of 71 acres of property for 120 residential units — Peterson Bluff. 1600 Pioneer Trail J. Edwin Chadwick, LLC 11430 Zion Circle Bloomington, MN 55347 PRESENT ZONING: A2, Agricultural Estate Peterson Jacques Farm LLC 15900 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Office/Industrial, Residential Medium Density, and Parks and Open Space ACREAGE: 71 acres — gross; 41.5 acres — net DENSITY: 1.7 units/acre — gross; 2.9 units/acre — net SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Concept Planned Unit Development Approval for a mixed residential development. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City has a high level of discretion in approving rezoning, PUD's and land use amendments because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning or PUD must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. _4 Location Map Peterson Bluff Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-20 1600 P ioneer Trail City of Chanhassen SCANNED Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19,2005 Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sever Peterson is requesting to change the land use recommendation and the zoning of his property. Mr. Peterson has owned this property for four decades. The timing of the development of this area is driven by the improvements of Highway 212/312 and the City's comprehensive plan which anticipates that this area be developed between 2005-2010. The current land use on this site is Office/Industrial or Residential -Medium Density. The applicant request is for Residential -Low Density. This would require a land use amendment and rezoning. After conceptual approval, the applicant would have to pursue a Land Use Amendment, Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD), Conditional Use Permit for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District, and Site Plan Approval. The applicant is seeking conceptual PUD rezoning approval. A PUD is being requested because there will be a mix of low density housing types. The site is in the Bluff Creek Overlay district. The tool that the City has to cluster density out of the primary district is the PUD. As per the PUD ordinance, "approval of the concept statement shall not obligate the City to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district." The purpose of the concept plan is to outline the issues that the applicant will have to further develop in order to proceed with preliminary subdivision and rezoning to PUD. Staff has been working with the City's consultant on the AUAR road and utilities plan. There have been four meetings with the property owners in the area to review the design alternatives. It is the City's goal to have the infrastructure design approved by the City Council and the project ordered later this summer. Since the Peterson plan has been submitted, a different road alignment has been advanced. BACKGROUND Concept PUD - What is required? The intent of the concept plan is to get an early read from the commission and council without incurring a lot of expensive. Following are the requirements for conceptual PUD approval. Sec. 20-517 General Concept Plan. Chanhassen City Code (a) The general concept plan for a PUD provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to the city showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without incurring substantial cost. The plan shall include the following: (1) Overall gross and net density. (2) Identification of each lot size and lot width. (3) General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. (4) General location and extent of public and common open space. (5) General location and type of land uses and intensities of development. (6) Staging and time schedule for development. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 3 (b) The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be filed with the city before the staff commences review. Approval of the concept statement shall not obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district. (c) The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures: (1) The developer meets with the city staff to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan, together with all supporting data. (3) The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and report its findings and make recommendations to the city council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official news- paper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days prior thereto to owners of land within five hundred (500) feet of the boundary of the property and an on -site notification sign erected. (4) Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning commis- sion, the city council shall consider the proposal. If the planning commission fails to make a report within sixty (60) days after receipt of the application, then the city council may proceed without the report. The council may approve the concept plan and attach such conditions, as it deems reasonable. Approval shall require a four -fifths vote of the entire council. Alternative Urban Areawide Review The conceptual approval of Town and Country required an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Rather than completing an EAW on just their site, an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was undertaken for the entire 2005 MUSA (Lower Bluff Creek) Metropolitan Urban Service Area. In reviewing the Lower Bluff Creek in a holistic setting, there were specific mitigation strategies that were established and they are listed below. Attached are the Complete Mitigation Initiatives. All of the recommendations are being incorporated in the design of the Lower Bluff Creek area. All property with the Lower Bluff Creek area will be assessed for the cost of the AUAR on a per acreage basis. The assessment for the AUAR will be paid at the time of plat recording. Specific strategies: I. All permits identified in the AUAR (See question #8), as well as other necessary permits that may be required, will be secured by the City, or private parties as appropriate, for all development activities within the project area. 2. The City will follow its own regulations, ordinances, plans, and policies currently in place in the review and approval of all development activities within the project area. These items include The 2020 Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the official zoning and subdivision ordinances and the Bluff Creek Overlay ordinance. In addition, the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan, the Surface Water Management Plan, the Public Water Supply and Distribution System Plan (currently being revised) and the Comprehensive Sewer Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 4 Policy Plan will be used as technical resources in reviewing development activities and developing associated public infrastructure. 3. The City will extend public sewer and water services in a manner consistent with existing plans and policies for delivering trunk sanitary sewer service and watermain systems. Abandonment and closure of individual well and septic systems will follow existing local and state regulations. 4. The City will work with Mn/DOT and Carver County to periodically monitor traffic as generated from development within the project area as well as regional development initiatives that will affect the project area. Regional roadway improvements such as TH 2121312 and improvements to County Roads (Audubon Rd., Lyman Blvd., Pioneer Trail and future Powers Blvd. extension) will alter travel patterns. Performing traffic counts and monitoring traffic movements will help in facilitating future local roadway improvements. 5. The City will provide for adequate regional and local stormwater ponds and trunk facilities to protect water resources and water quality as guided by the Storm Water Management Plan and Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan. [National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase H with individual site development] 6. The City will implement a development tracking mechanism to monitor development within the AUAR Project Area and its conformance with the development scenario. 7. The City will enforce its parkland dedication practices consistent with the goals and policies outlined in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan and the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan and the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. The City will follow existing zoning regulations including Floodplain Overlay (Article V), Wetland Protection (Article VI), Shoreland Management (Article VIE[), Bluff Protection (Article XXVH0 and Bluff Creek Overlay (Article XXXI) to protect natural and environmental resources from potential impacts resulting from the Development Scenario. The City will reference policies and strategies outlined in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan and Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan as technical resources during the review of specific development projects. ANALYSIS Rezoning — Land Use Rezoning of this property to PUD-R low density would be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. A land use amendment would be required. Approval of the land use amendment is subject to the Metropolitan Council approval. Staff support of the land use amendment is contingent upon maintaining approximately the same land use type percentages in the 2005 MUSA area. To date, there may be a request to locate industrial in the northeast portion of the site. With the update of the comprehensive plan in 1998, this property was given the two land use alternatives: Residential -Medium Density or Office/Industrial, as well as parks and open space Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 5 within the Bluff Creek Corridor. The reason it was given both potential land uses was that the site has been and is farmed and was adjacent to the Benardi (Town and County) property which was similarly guided. In calculating the City's 2020 land use designations, this 80-acre site was calculated at 50 percent industrial and 50 percent medium density residential. (The City's 2020 land use for industrial zoning was estimated at 1,229 acres (based on the change by Town and Country) or 8.3 percent of ultimate industrial. If this site were to be developed as all low density residential, there would 20 acres less of industrial land or a reduction from 1,209 or a percentage reduction of .015 percent to 8.1 percent. Based on the developer's calculations of net developable land (41.4 acres) with a maximum of 8 units an acre, the maximum number of units could be 332. The proposal is for 119 units which would yield a net density of 2.9 units an acre. According to the City Comprehensive Plan, net density less than 4 units an acre is low density. The current subdivision layout does not reflect the proposed alignment of the east west collector (Bluff Creek Boulevard). The road location may alter the property dwelling unit types. The proposed house types include 37 single-family homes, 34 twin homes and 48 quad homes. Land Use Commercial Office/Industrial Office Parks & Open Space Public/Semi-Public Residential Large Lot Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Mixed Use Undevelopable 2020 Land Use Plan % of Existing Proposed Change Total 212 212 0 1.4% 1,229* 1,209 -20 8.1 % 117 117 0 .8% 1,466 1,466 0 9.9% 1,242 1,242 0 8.8% 2,247 2,247 0 15.2% 5,473 5,493 +20 37.2% 669* 669 0 4.5% 398 398 0 2.6% 134 134 0 .9% 1,573 1,573 0 10.6% TOTALS 14,760 acres 14,760 acres - 100% * adjusted based on the request from Town and Country Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19,2005 Page 6 Chanhassen 2005 AUAR Project Magnitude Data LAND USE TOTAL NET PERCENTAGE MAIIIMIJM PROJECT DESIGNATION DEVELOPABLE OF INTENSITY OF MAGNITUDE ACRES LAND USE DEVELOPMENT DATA Medium Density 8 du/acre 528-1056 units Residential/Low 132 38 % Density Residential Medium Density 66 18% 8 du/acre 528 units Residential Office 17 5% 0.35 FAR 270,00 square feet Office/Industrial 70 20% 0.30 FAR 920,500 square feet Bluff Creek 45 13% Primary Zone Park 20 6% ark Net Acres Total 350 100% * Any District 112 school has been eliminated from the 2005 MUSA Bluff Creek Overlay District The Bluff Creek Corridor Study is a vision and planning document that has the following goals: 1. Protection, Restoration and Enhancement of Natural Resources. 2. Acquire land to create a continuous greenway along the creek from the Minnesota River to Lake Minnewashta. 3. Create development standards that manage upstream development such as mixed or cluster development, conservation easements and alternative zoning. 4. Develop educational watershed awareness program. 5. Develop a Natural Resources Plan. An overlay district was created for Bluff Creek with a primary and secondary corridor. The primary corridor boundary delineates a conservancy zone where undistributed conditions are desired. This is the area where any type of development and/or human activity directly impacts the morphological and biological characteristics of Bluff Creek. The secondary corridor boundary delineates a management zone. This is the area where development and/or urban activities directly affect the stream's upland ecosystem. The preservation and enhancement of this area will result in a better habitat and less strain on the stream. Management practices for this area focus on the preservation and enhancement of upland vegetation and the reduction of peak flows. This parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The primary and secondary corridor boundaries and the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor are not shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the primary and secondary corridors and the setback. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. The grading plan should be revised to eliminate alterations within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 7 structures must meet the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor. STREETS The proposed street alignments shown on the concept plan are generally consistent with the recommended alignments identified in "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The concept plan identifies the TH 212 alignment as well as the east -west collector road that will ultimately connect Audubon Road (CSAH 15) to the proposed extension of Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17). Kimley-Horn has slightly modified the alignment of the portion of the east -west collector road through the Peterson property. The preliminary plat plans must incorporate the updated alignment of the east -west collector street and the proposed roundabout. The concept plan also identifies a "South Connector Roadway" that will connect the east -west collector to Pioneer Trail, consistent with the Report. The trunk roadway improvements described above shall be financed according to the recommendations within the Report, which includes special assessments that will be levied against this property. Right-of-way and street widths are not identified on the plan and will be reviewed with the preliminary plat submittal. Turn lane requirements and the typical street section shown in preliminary plans must be consistent with the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" recommendations. UTILITIES Trunk and lateral sanitary sewer and watermain improvements are required with the proposed project. A preliminary utility plan must be submitted with the preliminary plans and must comply with the trunk sanitary sewer and watermain design shown in the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report". Trunk sanitary sewer to serve the proposed subdivision shall extend from the existing trunk sanitary sewer located at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) and Audubon Road. The proposed trunk sanitary sewer between Lyman Boulevard and the proposed east -west collector road will be constructed by the City in conjunction with the 2005 MUSA Expansion Project, City Project #04-05. Trunk watermain improvements include the proposed 12" trunk watermain along Pioneer Trail, which will be constructed with the TH 212 design -build project. The "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" also specifies that IT' watermain be installed within the east -west collector road and within the "South Connector Roadway". Trunk utility improvements shall be financed according to the recommendations within the 2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report", which includes special assessments that will be levied against this property. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 8 A pressure reducing valve is required within the development and must be shown on the preliminary utility plan. The City will reimburse the developer for the cost to furnish and install the pressure reducing valve. The City will also reimburse the developer the oversizing cost between the 12" trunk watermain and an 8" lateral watermain. The preliminary utility plan must include lateral storm sewer to service the proposed development. It will be the developer's responsibility to install and finance the installation of lateral watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer to serve the units within the proposed development. All proposed trunk and lateral utilities shall meet the City's minimum design requirements. GRADING Town & Country's proposed liberty on Bluff Creek development lies west of the proposed Peterson Bluff PUD. The developer's engineer must work with Town & Country's engineer to minimize the amount and/or height of retaining walls to the maximum extent possible. 1 • 1 • 1' • 1 1 1. The attached single-family townhome buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system if they are over 8,500 sq. ft. in floor area. For the purposes of this requirement, property lines do not constitute separate buildings and the area of basements and garages is included in the floor area threshold. 2. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire - resistive construction. 3. Each unittlot must be provided with separate utility services. 4. Complete proposed site, grading and utility plans must be submitted to determine more detailed requirements. The Sever Peterson farm represents one of the properties located within the 2005 MUSA area that is currently being considered for development. The Peterson farm is situated on Bluff Creek and is proposed to be developed into residential housing. The number of units to be built is yet unknown, but initial estimates total 115 homes. The City's Comprehensive Park Plan calls for one acre of usable park space to be set aside for every 75 residents. The Peterson housing development will result in an estimated 300 new residents. In this scenario, the City's Comprehensive Plan would call for a four -acre park to be preserved and developed on this property. However, the Comprehensive Plan also recognizes that building a small park in every single family addition is undesirable and would result in an Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 9 unmanageable municipal park system. To this end, the plan calls for neighborhood parks to be centrally located within housing regions with a maximum distance of one mile between neighborhood parks. This pooling of resources and land in order to centrally locate parks in specific park service areas results in the efficient use of limited capital and long-term maintenance dollars. In the case of the Peterson Farm, the City is planning to service neighborhood park needs at a location directly north and across Bluff Creek from the farm. Therefore, it is anticipated that the City will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication on the Peterson parcel. A variety of pedestrian improvements will be incorporated into the Peterson development. Foremost is a ten -foot wide asphalt trail to be constructed within and paralleling the Bluff Creek Corridor. This important trail will most likely be constructed on the north side of Bluff Creek at this location. Additional pedestrian trails, sidewalks and trail connectors will be incorporated into the project as required. The planning and construction of these pedestrian improvements will, in most cases, be managed as private improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES WETLANDS Existing Wetlands A wetland delineation has not been submitted for the proposed project site. A report documenting the delineation of jurisdictional wetlands in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual must be submitted to the City as soon as possible. Wetland Replacement If wetland impacts are proposed, a wetland sequencing and mitigation plan must be submitted. Wetland replacement must occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. A wetland buffer 20 to 30 feet in width (with a minimum average of 20 feet) must be maintained around all Natural wetlands. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures must be set bank 40 feet from the edge of the wetland buffer. The wetland buffer setback should be shown on the plans. BLUFFS Any areas on the property that meet the City's criteria for bluffs (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe) must be preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19,2005 Page 10 bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT The City of Chanhassen established the Bluff Creek Overlay District by ordinance in 1998 to protect the Bluff Creek Corridor, wetlands, bluffs and significant stands of mature trees through the use of careful site design and other low -impact practices. This parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The primary corridor boundary and the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor are not shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the primary corridor and the setback. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All structures must meet the 40- foot setback from the primary corridor. A conditional use permit will be required for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District corridor. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL Storm Water Management The concept plan does not show storm water management infrastructure. Storm water from the site shall be treated to National Urban Runoff Protection (NURP) standards. Post -development storm water discharge rates must not exceed pre -development rates. Easements Drainage and utility easements with a minimum width of 20 feet shall be provided over all utilities and drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as PVC and storm water infrastructure. Erosion and Sediment Control A complete Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) must be in place before applying for and receiving NPDES construction permit coverage from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Minimization of the amount of exposed soils on the site is needed; phasing of the development is recommended to limit the disturbed areas open. The creek and ravine systems throughout the development capture runoff from the erosive soils and significant slopes in some areas. Silt fence as the primary sediment control will not be sufficient. Surface Water Management Fees Based on approximately 39.8 acres at the medium density residential water quality and water quantity rates, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $245,009. Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (dewatering permit), Army Corps of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 11 This site's agricultural use over the years has resulted in wooded areas existing along the edges of fields and in wetter areas. Nearly all the existing woods fall within the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Corridor. These areas will receive protection and help create an attractive buffer for the development as well as protect Bluff Creek. Landscaping requirements for the Peterson development include: 1. Based on the existing canopy coverage for the site, the developer will need to meet minimum planting requirements. 2. Bufferyard planting will be required along the south and west property lines. 3. Landscaping for the attached housing area should include native species for overstory and foundation plantings as well as non-native, ornamental selections. 4. Large groupings of materials will help extend the natural areas into the developed sites and create privacy for residents. 5. A strong, boulevard tree planting element is recommended within the development and required along any collector roads. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval the Concept PUD with the following conditions: 1. Any land use changes to Residential land use shall be based on another property requesting an Industrial land use with in the 2005 AUAR area. 2. Implementation of the AUAR recommendations. 3. The preliminary plat plans must incorporate the updated alignment of the east -west collector street and the proposed roundabout. 4. Turn lane requirements and the typical street section shown in preliminary plans must be consistent with the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" recommendations. A preliminary utility plan must be submitted with the preliminary plans and must comply with the trunk sanitary sewer and watermain design shown in the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report". 6. A pressure reducing valve is required within the development and must be shown on the preliminary utility plan. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 12 7. The preliminary utility plan must include lateral storm sewer to service the proposed development. 8. The developer's engineer must work with Town & Country's engineer to minimize the amount and/or height of retaining walls to the maximum extent possible. 9. The attached single-family townhome buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system if they are over 8,500 sq. ft. in floor area. For the purposes of this requirement property lines do not constitute separate buildings and the area of basements and garages is included in the floor area threshold. 10. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire - resistive construction. 11. Each unit/lot must be providelc with separate utility services. 12. Complete proposed site, grading and utility plans must be submitted to determine more detailed requirements. 13. The City will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication on the Peterson parcel. 14. A report documenting the delineation of jurisdictional wetlands in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual must be submitted to the City. 15. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. A wetland buffer 20 to 30 feet in width (with a minimum average of 20 feet) must be maintained around all Natural wetlands. 16. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. 17. All structures must be set back 40 feet from the edge of the wetland buffer. The wetland buffer setback should be shown on the plans. 18. Any areas on the property that meet the City's criteria for bluffs (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe) must be shown on the plans and preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). 19. The primary corridor boundary and the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor are not shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the primary corridor and the setback. 20. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All structures must meet the 40-foot setback from the Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 13 primary corridor. 21. Based on the existing canopy coverage for the site, the developer will need to meet minimum planting requirements. 22. Bufferyard planting will be required along the south and west property lines. 23. Landscaping for the attached housing area should include native species for overstory and foundation plantings as well as non-native, ornamental selections. 24. Large groupings of materials will help extend the natural areas into the developed sites and create privacy for residents. 25. A strong, boulevard tree planting element is recommended within the development and required along any collector roads. 26. The development should establish viewsheds to be preserved as part of the development" ATTACHMENTS 1. Submittal letter and application. 2. Public hearing notice and property owners list. 3. Map of 2005 MUSA (see staff report attachment for Liberty on Bluff Creek). 4. Map of Land Use alternatives. 5. MnDOT letter dated June 30, 2005. 6. Development Concept A. gAplan\2005 planning cases\05-20 petmon bluftlpeamon bluff pad concepldoc PRINT 1t Name CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION Address: Phone: 952-8sj-.2Y77 Fax: 952- P8<-aY9z Email: ca o s i-� r or C. / r b, Comprehei isive Plan Amendment Conditiona Use Permit Interim Us Permit Non-confo ing Use Permit Coke l- iC Planned U it Development' Rezoning Sign Perm is Sign Plan eview Site Plan Iview* Planning Case No. Owner Narno Pe. fe,se Sack«ems _Fc�., LGL D _Ede Pao .'ri't NeN J s-.T S/Y Contact: steer Pe fe.r-� Phone: Fax: 17 r1- 9j, /_r9b' Email: le.- loe s p ctio/. a o» Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign" - $75 + $100 Damage Deposit X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost"' - $50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ jogs_ An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. Twenty-six (26) full- ize folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an Bh" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital opv in TIFF -Group 4 ('.tif) format. Applicant to obtain r otification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. Escrow will be requi ed for other applications through the development contract. Building material sa pies must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multi le applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: Yio.r[er V j wl new LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Po ,%,n&t. E ! / o k Ic y 27 r // AN R13 W �.� yo C,�L+t, SW %y NW /r }ecib T /Z&,v 2✓13 k1 TOTAL ACREAGE: _/ � a"CL/ / 20 fo Ss ais a (� 7o 4rsr it WETLANDS PRESENT: _)f YES NO PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: low a.J phe d,-" . deftj,'s y resi c(t.E.. / PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: ftd, 4o. d. /ti /a.{' 1 r p/y i •/i i �! �_Q c. f� ca. REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: %st A del` < ♦re-1r 710 Cs c � O/s lA� J vrs Aare COL e44Lin4 d9&' /onis,E ' .Dressr+ree e ,�4 c si e This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information 1 have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. �— /6 - 05' Date � dte SCANNED G:\planVorms\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 4/05 J. ED*IN 'CHADWIGK, LLC Land and Farms May 31, 2005 Ms. Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: .Peterson%Jacques Farm Information Letter Concept PUD Application to follow Dear Ms. Aanenson: 11430 Zion Circle - Blaomingron, Minne orz 55437 Office (952) 853-2473 FAX (952) 886-0492 - This information letter is conning forth at this time after two -years of deliberation and extensive work with city staff, MNDOT and the AUAR team. Timine The letting of the Trunk Highway 212 project and the rapid design/build process being undertaken by the contractor makes this a very time sensitive project. Additionally; the AUAR study bas,been completed over the last couple of years, the feasibility report for infrastructure for the area is in place and there is a natural synergy of timely land planning and construction in concert with the large Highway 212. The City has indicated that there is a desire to undertake the East West Collector Street and bridge project shortly as well. Clearly the time is now. Ownership Backeround The property is owned by Mr. Sever Peterson and has a long history with the Peterson family. Mr. Peterson, has owned the farm for four decades and been farming it even longer, having worked with the thrashing crew as a boy assisting his father and grandfather. Due to this long attachment to this parcel of land, Mr. Peterson wants to see a.style of development which is sensitive to the existing natural features and takes full advantage of the spectacular views on the site. Existing Land Use The site is currently a mix of farming uses and natural open space adjacent to and including parts of the Primary Bluff Creek Overlay Area. The topography has beautiful rolling hills and is one of the highest points in Chanhassen, resulting in spectacular views at many locations on the site. Adiacent Land Use . The land to the west of the site is where Town and Country Homes, Inc. has proposed the Liberty Development, which is a neighborhood of approximately 350 mid -density residential townhomes. The land to the north of the Peterson farm is under contract with Pemtom and is intended for housing - The land to the east of the Peterson farm is controlled by Town and Country Homes, Inc. and is intended for residential development. The land to the south is part of the 2015 and 2020 MUSA expansion areas and also includes the soon -to -be -constructed Highway 212. This area is also near one of the possible new CR 41 river crossing corridors, however, the impact of that potential project is questionable at this time due to the uncertainty of its final location and that the project is unfunded and therefore will likely not. occur until after 2020, which should be long after full development of the 2005 MUSA has occurred. Access to Infrastructure , The East-West Collector will run through the Peterson property in the northwest comer. This project calls for a nice sweeping boulevard and installation of sewer and water and is intended to start in 2005 or early 2006. The second major roadway improvement will be the road labeled in the AUAR as the Southern Connector Road which will run from the new East-West Collector to Pioneer Trail. Proposed Land Use The proposal is a residential planned unit development (PUD) on approximately 67 acres that is in concert with the residential component that is called forth by the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. The current guidance calls for development of4-8 units per acre of housing and although the ultimate density is still being worked out in design, we anticipate A will be at the lower end of that density range. This reduced density is due in large part to the constraints of the topography and soils and also due to the desire to preserve and enhance the access to the existing natural resources and views. We want to work with the existing . topography and resources rather than over-engineer,the site and destroy much of its unique and special character. Issues of density transfer of units that could be built within Bluff Creek Overlaytll but must be relocated out of the Primary, district will be worked out over time with City Staff. The East=West Collector and Southern Collector roads are proposed to be utilized as buffers between areas of higher and lower densities. Higher densities are proposed on -the west side of the site to remain compatible with the adjacent Town and Country Homes, Inc: proposed development and then the density drops off significantly as the topography rises in the east and adjacent to the Bluff Creek Overlay Area: . Our engineer did look at the suitability of the topography and soils for pon- residential purposes and determined that, much of the site was unsuitable for non- residential uses due to topography and soil constraints. That report has been provided to City staff. The Peterson Family would be disappointed if this beautiful site was turned into a sea of parking lots, loading docks and retaining walls. Housing Product Types The land use design would call for three residential product types of varying size and density. The centerpiece of the project _is an area of large lot executive home sites which would be overlooking or adjacent to the beautiful Bluff Creek Valley. These homes can be some of the premier homes in the area. There are more 20 acres of the Bluff Creek Park nature area which will preserved as part of this development and these homes will have wonderful views of this amenity as well as a view from the top of Chanhassen. The area west of the Southern Connector Road will be an area of 2-4 unit buildings which will provide a nice transition between Town and Country's offering to the west and the generous single-family homes to east. . The area north of the East-West Collector and on the western side of the parcel which would be contiguous with Town and Country will have a higher density. townhome product which would be similar to what is being offered by Town and Country in area immediately adjacent to it. This area would likely be physically connected to the Town and Country project through the, extension of Town and. Country's local street system. If the Town and Country project ends up reducing density adjacent to this area, it could be redesigned for more executive homes due to its proximity to the Bluff' Creek Overlay and terrain. We look forward to receiving input from the City regarding this proposal so that we can then move forward with the more detailed design information that will be needed for the City Engineer's final roadway design on the East-West Collector, and related infrastructure projects. Sincerely. F. Chadwick nclosure :« MAO--,y I im If m 1-4 I F r-- LL IMA E� CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MIINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on July 7, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Peterson Bluff Concept PUD — Planning Case 05-20 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and swom to before me this t-'% day of J t'-ttl , 2005. Notary 4.�N KIM T. MEUWISSENotary Public -Minnesota y Commlagbn EWp Jan 31, 2010 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for Concept Planned Unit Development — Peterson Bluff Planning File: 05-20 Applicant: J. Edwin Chadwick, LLC Property 1600 Pioneer Trail Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952-227-1139 Questions & or e-mail kaananson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at htto://206.10.76.6/weblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party Is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciaVindustdal. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersontrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff Is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Unit Development — Peterson Proposal: Bluff Planning File: 05-20 Applicant: J. Edwin Chadwick, LLC Property 1600 Pioneer Trail Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952-227-1139 Questions & or e-mail kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at http://206.10.76.6/weblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested parry is Invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that Includes all pertinent Information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerclaVindusulal. • Minnesota State statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersorvrepresentative Is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Plannino Staff person named on the notification. Al ibis map is neither a legacy recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as me. This nap is a corrpflation of record% information and data based in various city. county, state and federal offices and other scums regarding Me area shorn, and is to tie, used for reference purposes Only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used b prepare Nis map are error free, and Me City does rot represent ON the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other Purpose requiring ey ng measurenent of distance or direction or pradaW in the depiction of geographic features. t enors or discrepancies are found pease contact 962-227-1107. The Preceding disdafiner is Provided pursuant to Mnnesota Statutes §486.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and Me weer, of this nnal, xWwMedges Mat the Cty shall not ae gable for any damages, and e>pressiy waives all tlarte, and agrees to defend, intleriniy, and had hamiess Me City from any and all times brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise owl of the users access or use of data provided. This map is neither a legally recorded nap nor a survey and is not inarded to W used as one. This chap is a completion of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding Me area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City tines not warrant Mat the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and Me City does not represent that Me GIS Data can be used for navigational. trackng or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or director or precision in the depiefon of geographic features. a enom or discrepancies are found please contact 5-227-1107. The preceding cisclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Stables §466,03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any Barrages. and e>gxessly waives all claim, and agrees to defend. indemnify, and hald hamiess Me Gty from any and all Balms brought by User, its employees or agents, or Mho parties Wbicb arise out of the users access or use of data provided. "NAME,, «NAME1» «ADD111 «ADD2» «CITY» rrSTATE» "ZIP,,-aZIP4» rrNext Record»«NAME» «NAME1>> «ADD111 «ADD2n «CITY» «STATE» «ZIP11-1(ZIP4b GAYLE O & LOIS J DEGLER AURORA INVESTMENTS LLC FOX PROPERTIES LP TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 5215 EDINA INDUST BLVD 1630 LYMAN BLVD SUITE 100 27990 S , MN 55331 -7911 N RD EXCELSIOR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9402 MINNEAPOLIS . MN 55439 -3023 OR MN PETERSONJACQUES FARM LAND CO C/O SEVERIN H PETERSON JR 15900 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE. MN 55347 -4047 G&M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP 24760 CEDAR POINT RD NEW PRAGUE, MN 56071 -4056 NDI MINNESOTA LLC C/O HOVSTONE PROPERTIES MN LLC 7615 SMETANA LN SUITE 160 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346 -4700 ARTHUR BJOHNSON 17448 FRONDELL CT EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347 -3416 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG ST PAUL . MN 55155 -1801 KLINGELHUTZ CONSTRUCTION CO 350 HWY 212E CHASKA , MN 55318 -2144 BLUFF CREEK GOLF ASSOC CITY OF CHASKA JOHN UTZ 1025 CREEKWOOD DR C/O NOEL GRACZYK C/O DAMES W HEISEL CHASKA , MN 55318 -9647 1 CITY HALL PLAZA 35 EAST HWY 212 BOX 89 CHASKA , MN 55318 -1962 CHASKA , MN 55318 -0089 Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 June 30, 2005 Ms. Kate Aaneson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317-1447 SUBJECT: Peterson Farm Mn/DOT Review # S05-063 New TH 212 corridor, North side, East of CSAH 17 Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section: 1010 Dear Ms. Aaneson: MC IV-P JUL 0 1 ZOUD CITY Of CHANHASSEN Thank you for submitting the above referenced site plan. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MrMOT) has reviewed the Peterson Farm Site Plan, and have the following comments. The proposed development will need to maintain existing drainage rates. The City or project, developer will need to submit beforetafter hydraulic computations for both 10 and 100 year rainfall events verifying that all existing drainage patterns and systems affecting Mn/DOT right of way will be perpetuated. Stormwater ponds adjacent to Mn/DOT right-of-way shall be designed to a 100-year-24-hour storm event with 2 feet of freeboard. Please direct questions concerning these issues to Julie Whitcher (651-634-2080) of Mn/DOT's Water Resources section. ( Julie.whitcher(a)dot.state.mn.us ) • Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/ter-sun/utility . Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Keith Van Wagner (651-582-1443), or Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Review Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's 30-day review and response process to development proposals. ]f you happen to An equal 0000rtunity emolover know the property identification number, please include that information with your submittals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions, please feel free to call myself at 651-634-2083, or Tod Sherman at 651-582-1548. Voigt Transportation Planner Copy: Dave Drealan, Carver County Planning Department w �LL Y O J Y LL1� w WU Fw }O Jp O t mVl M WY W LLWWLL� m��< WLLWWLL� H n�i ii Tom+ mm�m Npiiii�v o olyw Fuwy¢y11� ^poy..1W Q (Yl FZ jm<Om QUYfF 1N m4 17 i1*<N 1WmmKY 2 N�y � � ZmN�1yLL� Ep NYW .. mrc gp W 01/1 <d'p0 I ZWp6 aYp Hr<s�g o¢JJ WF in><a�� rYJJ U<Uw r J g�Wpza z r gocoi< RV1S3 JJ O �I�i m vli2 riri z MN < W W W W O W W Z U U U U W 1`I LL LL LL LL p 00 J 7 J J r O m m m m iI M r I-\ a~ CR ovcr� OA-AP441-1 ■ 0 05 - 20 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCH, WORK SESSION AUGUST 22, 2005 Mayor Furlong called the work session to order at 5:35 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Councilman Labatt, Councilman Lundquist, Councilman Peterson and Councilwoman Tjornhom STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Justin Miller, Paul Oehme, Kate Aanenson, Greg Sticha, and Todd Hoffman PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION REGARDING THE 2006 BUDGET AND LEVY. Todd Gerhardt introduced the item and commended department heads for doing an admirable job with budget projections. Greg Sticha reviewed his memo, highlighting expenditures, revenues and levy projections. Todd Gerhardt talked about developments that are projected to create building permit revenues in 2006. Mayor Furlong asked for clarification on existing market value increases. Councilman Lundquist asked staff to clarify how the numbers work with the tax "rate versus actual dollar amounts. Todd Gerhardt explained how staff is proposing to use the projected excess $2 million dollars to keep the levy constant over the next 4 years. Greg Sticha explained that the 2006 budget does assume a 5'h% increase in wages. Todd Gerhardt noted that there were no service level cuts. He stated staff was looking for direction from City Council to determine which scenario to use for the Truth in Taxation levy. Staff is recommending Scenario #2. Mayor Furlong asked if there was anything new that the city may need to bond for in the next 5 years. Todd Gerhardt stated that in 2009 the city will be out of cash so the council needs to start planning now for how the city will fund future road projects. Mayor Furlong directed staff to explore the 1.5% scenario with 0% increase in the amount of taxes property owners will pay. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: DISCUSSION OF ZONING DISTRICTS, INCLUDING INDUSTRIAL. Kate Aanenson presented background information on the 1998 comprehensive plan and how those numbers were determined. She outlined assumptions that were used in determining the numbers for 2005 through 2020. Mayor Furlong asked what land is available in the 2010 comprehensive plan to meet the projected numbers. Kate Aanenson gave a power point presentation showing Chanhassen's land use in comparison to other key financial cities. Mayor Furlong asked staff to explain how they figure density transfer numbers, net versus gross and if it's the same as how other cities calculate their numbers. Kate Aanenson explained the numbers in the 2005 MUSA area, what happens if you take industrial out, and where in the city you can pick it up. Mayor Furlong asked about land use and what future opportunities there are for medium density and office/industrial and how those numbers impact current projects such as Town and Country Homes and Peterson Bluff. Todd Gerhardt explained how the City Council can give direction to begin the process of re -guiding property and how the road configuration through the 2005 MUSA area would differ depending on different land uses. Councilman Labatt SCANNED City Council Meeting — August 22, 2005 • asked for further clarification on the rezoning process. Councilman Lundquist stated nothing's changed since 2 weeks ago and asked if there were timing issues involved. Kate Aanenson explained that the City Council needs to make a decision at their September 8`s meeting on moving forward with the road project. The work session was recessed at 7:00 p.m and reconvened at 8:25 p.m.. Paul Oehme showed a map of the Highway 101 corridor and reviewed staffs discussions with MnDot and Carver County on sharing cost to conduct a study. Todd Gerhardt explained that it's a good opportunity for the city to work with the State and County. Kate Aanenson explained how the process will work in receiving citizen input. Councilman Lundquist asked how many years the data from the study is valid. Mayor Furlong asked what the city will get for the money spent. Todd Gerhardt stated the key to this request is getting the corridor officially mapped. DISCUSSION OF 2006 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 06-01. Paul Oehme gave a power point presentation on the 2005-2009 proposed street improvement projects, highlighting the 2006 streets, along with sewer and ponding projects. Councilman Lundquist asked for clarification on the estimated number of lots and assessment projects. Mayor Furlong talked about the revolving assessment fund and how that can be sustained into the future. He noted he liked the 5 year projection plan. Mayor Furlong adjourned the work session meeting at 9:00 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim OS- Zo City Council Work Session •August 8, 2005 CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1600 PIONEER TRAIL: PETERSON BLUFF. Kate Aanenson presented an update on this project. Mayor Furlong adjourned the work session meeting at 7:00 p.m.. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim 2 !CANNED City Council Meeting — A•st 8, 2005 • Kate Aanenson: On or before. Councilman Lundquist: Or before. Mayor Furlong: On or before. If they're ready to come back earlier. Councilman Lundquist: On or before the 26t6 of September. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Thank you. Is there a second to that motion? Councilman Labatt: Second. Councilman Lundquist moved, Councilman Labatt seconded that the City Council table the request for rezoning from A2 to PUD-R, site plan review with subdivision of 6 blocks and 69 buildings including 446 units, 3 Outlots A, B & C which represent the Overlay District and 7 common lots of 91.02 acres, conditional uses for the development in the Bluff Creek Overlay District and alteration of the Flood Plain and a Wetland Alteration Permit, Liberty on Bluff Creek, Planning Case No. 05-11. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1600 PIONEER TRAIL: PETERSON BLUFF, J. EDWIN CHADWICK. LLC: PLANNING CASE NO.05-20. Kate Aanenson: Thank you. This subject property is 71 acres and they're requesting a PUD. Obviously noting what's happening to the west of them, want to tie into that. Again this property also has dual guiding. These are medium density, or industrial. The applicant is requesting a low density zoning which would require a land use amendment. Again this is concept approval. I'm not going to go through all of the issues in here. It does require a 4/5 as per city code vote. The concept doesn't have legal standing. What the applicant is looking for is they would like to again proceed at a relatively fast time track to develop this property. The project you have in the packet reflects what they submitted probably 6 to 8 weeks ago but it doesn't reflect the current layout as proposed with the new road. As shown on this. They're proposing to do some twin homes and predominantly single family. Again they'll be a tie into the collector road to the north and then as I indicated the AUAR requires this connection down to Pioneer with single family. So when you're looking at this site plan, we haven't looked at it to scale it. To look at it. That will be the next level. Really what we're here to discuss is the land use itself and if we were to stay with industrial, over here we have this little remnant piece here. Again we looked at that with the change in grades, connecting to so really you're into this area right here. From the very beginning Mr. Peterson's requested residential but this isn't showing it here. What does show up on the overall flood plain, it is a significant amount of property in the flood plain. If you look at the computation that's in your report here, Mr. Peterson's property would be, as I indicated 70 acres. Quite a bit of it is in the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Actually approximately 29 acres and quite a bit of it was bought or acquired by MnDot. Approximately 43 acres so of his entire piece that goes all the way over, it's encumbered by 71 se"Mm City Council Meeting — August 8, 2005 • either right-of-way or flood plain so we had this little remnant piece. We think this makes a good transition between the two. Again I'm going to see how that lays out exactly and again the concept is really to get some direction from the council on whether you would consider the low density, which would be up to 4 units an acre. It may come back at a different configuration, iteration, how they see in making a transition too so with that, the staff is recommending approval of the concept again based on the fact that if this was residential, we think that the two kind of partner together based on the fact that this creates that bigger neighborhood. With that I am recommending approval of the concept and I'd be happy. I did mention that the Planning Commission also recommended conceptual approval. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Discussion or questions for staff. Excuse me. Councilman Lundquist: So Kate right now it's guided office industrial or a combination or. Either or? Kate Aanenson: Correct, half and half. And what they're requesting is ... land use because you're actually going down. Our comp plan says you have to meet the minimum so to go through the less than, under 4 units an acre would require a land use amendment. So that would come with the next stage. Councilman Lundquist: So how much was guided, how much was guided industrial? How much was guided. Kate Aanenson: The way they put it in the comprehensive plan was that, if it was 40 buildable, 20 of it would be industrial. 20 would be multi family so it'd be 20 apiece. So again, so we had looked at whether it was ever on this side of the road would blend into that. If we were to do that, that would be the portion. Todd Gerhardt: And Kate, how are you proposing to make up that 20 acres? Kate Aanenson: We do have a proposal that's coming in. Two different proposals. One is 5 acres. 4'/2. And another one at 10 acres that's coming in for a request to go to actually, one would be pure office. And the other one would be probably more, and it would also be office. So they're both office. Pure offices. About 15 acres. Mayor Furlong: About 15. Excuse me, Councilwoman Tjomhom. Please. Councilwoman Tjornhom: What are those properties guided now? Kate Aanenson: Both guided residential. But they're in, I believe in good location that makes good transitions with appropriate buffering. And office, not industrial. Just office... Yeah. I think they'll both be very palatable and accepted in the neighborhoods. Mayor Furlong: Other questions? Kate, a couple questions I guess in terms of layout and the thought process used. The first is the cul-de-sac up on the northern part of the piece here. The 72 A)A0.A3g City Council Meeting — A•st 8, 2005 • two cul-de-sacs I guess. Would it make sense to look at the eastern cul-de-sac there down to connect with the road below it? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, we had mentioned that to them. And that's just going to be the final design. But agreed, they should connect that. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And maybe I'm jumping ahead past the level that we should be asking for a concept but in terms of the location of the twin homes on the north versus, and single family on the south where the right-of-way is along the south, is that, I mean my observation was to possibly flip those. To move the twin homes to the southern part of the property along with 212 right-of-way and move the single family to the north. Kate Aanenson: To be perfectly honest with you, we haven't looked at it that close. We just asked them to give us what they've got to date that matches the road alignment because we wanted to look at where the touchdown points were. What they submitted is actually completely different with a different road alignment, so really what we're looking at is to give them some direction for the next go around so if your direction would be maybe to look at putting better transitions, I think that's appropriate that ... where there's greater density on the one side. I think that's the direction we're looking for. But we didn't comment too much on that but I think that's very appropriate. Mayor Furlong: Okay, and I guess the question is, is that the comment at this point at the concept plan or is that... Kate Aanenson: Sure. No, I think to comment now so when they come back at the next level... Mayor Furlong: We're trying to build efficiency into this process. Kate Aanenson: They're set to go. Mayor Furlong: I don't know if we can do that. Todd Gerhardt: Maybe we should break it up, move it around... Councilman Lundquist: We haven't done anything else tonight. Let's just table it now. Mayor Furlong: We approved the minutes from the prior meeting. That being said, I guess those are a couple observations and I would defer to the better planners in the group about the transition period to the western property line, as well as the right-of-way on the bottom and the location of the twin homes versus the single. And certainly the connection of those, there's no reason I believe to leave those two cul-de-sacs up there by themselves. We're still trying to build a city here I think in terms of patchwork of developments. So those are a couple of initial comments or questions I guess I'm asking. I think I'm getting into comments. Other questions for staff. Councilman Peterson: I agree with your comments. No questions. 73 City Council Meeting — August 8, 2,005 • Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright. Is the applicant here this evening? If you'd like to address the council. Good evening. Thank you for waiting. John Chadwick: Thanks for letting me be here. My name's John Chadwick. I live at 11430 Zion Circle here on behalf of the Peterson family. Happy to be here. Thanks for our mayor, staff. We've all been working on this for quite a while and it's great. We're here to do our very best to build a signature project for the city. You're sitting at number 16. Why can't we advance a little bit. Let's do that and as far as your Money Magazine rating. Councilman Lundquist: You need to build a restaurant. John Chadwick: I'll get back to you on that. But Kate was correct, she said you know we put this together pretty fast. We got the, I think Thursday we got the diagrams from Mr. Horn as far as where the road would be and that's great. We're happy to respond as very fast as we can. Comments well taken as far as connectivity and do you want to move those in different areas? Absolutely that is something to look at. Very blessed with beautiful views on this site. A lot of topography. A lot of Bluff Creek overlay. A lot of congruity of your park system here. And what I'm leading up to is it'd be a shame to put that in there industrial between two residential, potential residential areas with all of the relief that we have there. I'll come back to that in a minute. As far as you know the kind of layout and we've got some cul-de-sacs and a beautiful view. We had great support out of Planning Commission. It was kind of like gee I want to get that tape so when we have a bad day I can put that back in and listen to that. They were very kind to us. And I thank your compatriots on that commission. Additionally Mr. Horn said well I can see in that cul-de-sac where I want to have my lot and that was totally unsolicited and I'll take these things so we're very happy and we're very happy to work with the staff extensively on this and want to continue to do that. And we're here you know kind of in support, well very much in support of AUAR and these roads that are being built here and in order to do our part we have to have a revenue in, have a revenue out to support that. A year and a half ago I think I was here and was mentioning to Sever, I said you know Sever you've got to go along with these road projects. I know sometimes it gets a little nervous. Our family had to, was happy to go along with some out in the Shakopee area. Didn't know quite how it was going to turn out. It turned out just great. You see you've got to be a little patient, have a little faith and here you go. And to date that has been a good move and we want to continue that to be a good move. Our desire would be to keep moving and keep pace with you and the whole team here and that's, let's get a concept plan rolling and then beyond that then is the next step where we've got to get our preliminary plat in order. And in order to do all of that, we need some, well obviously we need some direction from your folks here tonight and respectfully I would ask, if you look at the conditions, the first condition is number 1 and that says, gosh we need to come up. I guess all have been addressed here as far as what are you going to do about industrial, but we can't really move forward if we don't know what we're doing. If that's a hold out over our head. I think you can understand that. So if we could respectfully ask that that maybe be stricken or reconsidered or something, that way we can get the rest of the team moving and keep, and continue to keep pace with what you folks would like to do. Beyond that looking for input. Suggestions. Want to build a nice project. Get this connectivity going and support what's, a lot of effort that's gone forth on behalf of the city, want to continue to support that so. If there's questions, I'll take them. Otherwise I'll sit down. 74 City Council Meeting — ARst 8, 2005 • Mayor Furlong: Any questions for, no? Very good, thank you. If there's anybody that wishes to provide public comment on this matter, the council would be happy to entertain that at this time. Nobody? Okay. Very good. Let's bring it back to council for additional questions or comments. Keep it moving here. Councilman Lundquist. Councilman Lundquist: I would not disagree with the comments you made before Mr. Mayor. But this one, I'm going to just hold to the, not necessarily the industrial piece for this property given some of the things that Mr. Chadwick said too as well as some of the views and things, but it seems to be a theme tonight at least that we're trading this stuff out for the industrial for the residential so. I would, my preference would be to hold off on this until either we see some of the other parcels that Kate that you were talking about. Some of the others so we've got some idea on where we're going to start to trade some of this, some of these pieces out and given that the right-of-way is right there on the highway, the best spot we're going to have for office industrial I think is going to be along the highway I believe and so before we put twin homes or single family homes or something in there, take a serious look at that so I need some more information or assurance that we're not just going to continue to replace our industrial guidance with residential on those choices. When we've got a choice we seem to be going more and more residential so. Got to have a mix there. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Other comments. Discussion. Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjomhom: You know I think I disagree. I think that it's ... to get into the whole scheme of what's developing around this area. And Kate, did you tell me or did I hear that you did trade spaces. That you did? Kate Aanenson: No. We're working on one right now. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Okay. So that's not chiseled in stone as far as industrial. Kate Aanenson: As far as office, correct... Mayor Furlong: Okay. Councilman Peterson. Councilman Peterson: Yeah, I'd play back my statement from the previous presentation I guess it was. The item before on the agenda. That I'm not, it doesn't have to be a quid pro quo but it's got to be distinctive and unique for me to make a decision to move it out of industrial. To Councilman Lundquist's point, there are, I mean this is a pretty good area for industrial because of the access points so it's even further reason to leave it but I'm not adverse to seeing a product and saying that that is what the people of Chanhassen are looking for and say yes without replacing it. It's more of a task for staff to let them run after the industrial as best we can. Mayor Furlong: The access point you're referring to is off Pioneer Trail? Councilman Lundquist: 212. 75 City Council Meeting — August 8, 2005 • Councilman Peterson: If it can be accessed there. I don't know the elevations and. Mayor Furlong: Well the road map with the AUAR includes that connector coming south from the eastlwest connector down to Pioneer Trail, so that's where the AUAR and it was put in place with some development, either industrial or medium density here. Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Councilman Labatt. Councilman Labatt: I agree with Bethany. This would be the ideal piece of property for residential and I like the fact that we have some twin homes for some empty nesters and a nice, quiet little nitch. And then some obvious nice single family that are out overlooking a beautiful Bluff Creek primary zone. So I like it. Mr. Chadwick talking about the topography down there and how this would be a very unique spot for some single family spots, I could strongly support that change. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Question for Ms. Aanenson. Condition 1, which was raised by the applicant. That requires another property within the 2005 AUAR to request a change. Are the properties that you're considering, are they within the 2005 AUAR? Kate Aanenson: No. Mayor Furlong: They're not. Kate Aanenson: No. Mayor Furlong: So something less restrictive there. One might gain a little more comfort based on the comments I'm hearing, you know really we don't, you've always preached to us that don't just look at the AUAR for land use. We look at the entire city and so to the extent that we have other parcels, property owners that are looking to change to industrial throughout the city, may address Councilman Lundquist and Peterson, some of your concerns there. And that doesn't do anything about the character and what's, what they might come back with on the site plan. Excuse me, go ahead. Councilman Peterson: To that point, I don't know if it's incumbent upon the developer to find industrial land. Hence this may be in and of itself inappropriate condition. That if they present to us a distinctively unique opportunity for a new housing stock that fits into there, that's our obligation to find it, not their's. So I guess maybe I agree with their point. Councilman Lundquist: I would concur as well. Mayor Furlong: To? 76 x City Council Meeting — August 8, 2005 Councilman Peterson: To remain in it's current state. It's still going to be incumbent upon them. You know I'm not saying that I'm not granting the ability to move it away from industrial. I'm saying it's not, they shouldn't be obligated to replace it. Mayor Furlong: Understand. Councilman Lundquist: I think if you were to change, Mr. Mayor if you were to change, to remove that 2005 AUAR and just say property requesting an industrial land use within the city, I still wouldn't be in support because of what Mr. Peterson said. I mean not necessarily, not only is it I don't think incumbent upon that, us to hold that developer hostage per se until we can find something like that but you know, again it's, I'm not sure it's the appropriate condition at all so I would favor removing it but wouldn't favor supporting the recommendation right now until we've got some other information about what our options are for other industrial. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright. What obligation do we place on ourselves or future councils if any with regard to the concept plan? Kate Aanenson: Concept plans have no legal standing. What the goal is to give them clear direction and I guess what the staff was looking at, what I he is that you wanted them to come back just as you did on the other one, to come back with something compelling. Even if it's the lower density, something compelling need and that's our obligation to show you where those other sites were. So if you gave them conceptual approval with those marching orders before they came back. Again part of the goal of this, of doing this development, we're working together. As they're working through the design we're working with these road designs to get these out that work... somewhat similar tracks so certainly I think we can accomplish both those goals and we heard some direction from the mayor regarding those transition areas. Looking at the single family type product, what that should be to accomplish that and it's my job to show you where those other industrial or office uses of the land to make up that difference. Mayor Furlong: And I would I guess comment, agree with Councilman Lundquist and Councilman Peterson in that there's got to be a compelling reason there and understanding of how, from a tax base standpoint we don't get in a situation where we're always, we're always reducing this area of our land use. At the same time I can't help but say that, I can't, I wouldn't be opposed to this type of development under the condition that that land use is changed out of residential someplace else. So to the extent that that's a condition or an understanding of the concept plan, I think it'd be nice to put that in there. Maybe not as a condition but as an understanding somehow that the concept is agreeable but that there are uncontrollable factors that we're looking at elsewhere in the city for replacement land. And it is uncontrollable. On the developer's part. Certainly we can affect that as we look for it but from a concept standpoint I can, you know it certainly seems to work with what's around it as well so, I can see going forward here as long as that understanding is there that, some uniqueness as Councilman Peterson mentioned. Compelling reasons to reduce the commercial industrial but to Councilman Lundquist's request, clearly identifying the exchanged land use somewhere else within the city and in so doing, taking out with that understanding, taking, take out item number one. 77 i • City Council Meeting — August 8, 2005 Kate Aanenson: And just to be clear on top of page 3... top of page 3 (b) it says, approval of the concept plan shall not obligate the city to approve any final plans thereof or rezone so ... to give them direction to come back. Todd Gerhardt: My only confusion in this is how much of a commitment do you need on these other parcels? I mean we don't have, I mean we've talked to people but we don't have applications in and you know some of them are kind of long term. Councilman Lundquist: I feel a little bit not really comfortable going forward right now. I think it's just, I wouldn't feel comfortable giving this developer the direction that yeah, we like this and go ahead. Invest the time and resources. Spend your money. Do something that we could be 2 years down the road and who knows what's going to happen and we continue to hold them hostage in essence for something that I think I'm not, I can't lay that out there because I'm not comfortable. There's a lot of things that need to happen for me to say yeah, I think this is the way to go here so I feel obligated to not say yes and you know, not encourage further resources and other expenditures and effort by the developer to only to come back and he rejected or something like that so I'm not against what's shown on the paper right now. I just think there's too many other unknowns and I can't say yes to the concept right now without some other things falling into place. Councilman Peterson: I think one of which is that this council really hasn't sat down and spent any time reviewing and diagnosing the impact of taking out industrial. I think that may be something Todd that put on the agenda and when we talk about the implications of that, I might be able to make a more informed decision after we spend some time talking about it. Mayor Furlong: And to your point Councilman Peterson, I know that was a discussion but time moves fast. It was probably a couple years ago or more when we were working with the Key Financial Strategies talking about tax capacity and balancing from where we were, where we are now. I don't know how much additional development has occurred since we last did that but again I'm just going off memory. It's probably been, it was probably 2003. I don't know that it was last year that we did that. We finalized the Key Financial Strategies in '03 so that was probably the last time we sat down so it might be worthwhile. Todd Gerhardt: We can do that. Mayor Furlong: Is there a desire at this point to take action on this concept plan with that discussion in mind? Thoughts? Let me ask this question. Councilman Labatt: Then the applicant would. Mayor Furlong: Let me ask you a question. What's the timing in terms of the, if this concept plan were approved tonight, what's your expected time in terms of coming back with a site plan? John Chadwick: Just as soon as possible sir. And appreciate the ... we're really trying to dovetail with everything that's going on so we've been going like fury to get here and we want to continue that pace... And honestly there's already 28 industrial parks sandwiched in here. I 0 City Council Meeting — A• st 8, 2005 • totally understand and respect the need for industrial land but being this interchange didn't go there, maybe it belongs some place where there's better access for semi trucks not mixing in with Tonka Toys. So there is ... challenge for the city out there to find the area to put it and based on, I'm not totally convinced with all the beautiful views and where it's situated now, with the way this all has been developed, that this would be... Mayor Furlong: Alright. Councilman Peterson: Well we don't have consensus I don't think and I'm comfortable having them move ahead if they feel as though they can present something that is extraordinary then my need to replace it is less. So I think that if we sat down and talked about it some more I may change my mind but probably not. Councilman Labatt: So you're okay with re -wording number 1 or eliminating it? Councilman Peterson: Yeah they already know that it needs to be rezoned and they've already heard tonight what it's going to take to be rezoned, which from my perspective when the previous offer came, wasn't there yet. Councilman Labatt: Well no, no. The extraordinary, but in order about replacing the. Councilman Peterson: Yeah I'm just looking, all I want them to, a very descriptive adjective to give them a higher standard so. Mayor Furlong: It went beyond compelling. Councilman Peterson: Exactly. I'm tired of using that word now. Mayor Furlong: Alright. I guess my thought there would be, clearly the information's there. It's on the record. Making an approval here conditioned upon some other property owner I think is not appropriate. I think taking out number 1 is appropriate. And we'll take out number 1 even though the sense of the council should be very clear at this point and with that, if there's a desire to go ahead with a motion, certainly entertain that at this time. Councilman Labatt: I'll move that we approve for the concept PUD with the following conditions, 2 through. Councilman Peterson: 26. Councilman Labatt: 26. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Thank you. Is there a second to that motion? Councilwoman Tjomhom: Second. 79 City Council Meeting — Au• 8, 2005 • Mayor Furlong: Made and seconded. Any discussion? Hearing none, we'll proceed with the vote. Councilman Labatt moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council approve the Concept PUD with the following conditions: 1. Implementation of the AUAR recommendations. 2. The preliminary plat plans must incorporate the updated alignment of the east -west collector street and the proposed roundabout. 3. Turn lane requirements and the typical street section shown in preliminary plans must be consistent with the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" recommendations. 4. A preliminary utility plan must be submitted with the preliminary plans and must comply with the trunk sanitary sewer and watermain design shown in the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report". 5. A pressure reducing valve is required within the development and must be shown on the preliminary utility plan. 6. The preliminary utility plan must include lateral storm sewer to service the proposed development. 7. The developer's engineer must work with Town & Country's engineer to minimize the amount and/or height of retaining walls to the maximum extent possible. 8. The attached single-family townhome buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system if they are over 8,500 sq. ft. in floor area. For the purposes of this requirement property lines do not constitute separate buildings and the area of basements and garages is included in the floor area threshold. 9. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire - resistive construction. 10. Each unit/lot must be provided with separate utility services. 11. Complete proposed site, grading and utility plans must be submitted to determine more detailed requirements. 12. The City will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication on the Peterson parcel. 13. A report documenting the delineation of jurisdictional wetlands in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual must be submitted to the City. 'Nt' City Council Meeting — August 8, 2005 • 14. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around all AgRJrban wetlands. A wetland buffer 20 to 30 feet in width (with a minimum average of 20 feet) must be maintained around all Natural wetlands. 15. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. 16. All structures must be set back 40 feet from the edge of the wetland buffer. The wetland buffer setback should be shown on the plans. 17. Any areas on the property that meet the City's criteria for bluffs (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe) must be shown on the plans and preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). 18. The primary corridor boundary and the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor are not shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the primary corridor and the setback. 19. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All structures must meet the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor. 20. Based on the existing canopy coverage for the site, the developer will need to meet minimum planting requirements. 21. Bufferyard planting will be required along the south and west property lines. 22. Landscaping for the attached housing area should include native species for overstory and foundation plantings as well as non-native, ornamental selections. 23. Large groupings of materials will help extend the natural areas into the developed sites and create privacy for residents. 24. A strong, boulevard tree planting element is recommended within the development and required along any collector roads. 25. The development should establish viewsheds to be preserved as part of the development." All voted in favor, except Councilman Lundquist who opposed and the motion carried with a vote of 4 to 1. 91 �� v 4ifi• 4�Yy� �� ri �$ a s�o.x f �n rMaZ�' M < j TTI < j I �$=e oo oo�n N N N N M N M M M M -x o 0o me im N t N NiM Noo MYN4Nmm it II Nx 0 e c a < K R < K4 N a 5m LL' ry Q m 1� ow O W < a1' W O W;< Q F � I W m z 8 2y Z p az1 Wi W O&4 z F1� p�y Z ui F o p Q g� F O p oa r m K O �OVy 4 r O �S <2 Z0 z �ty1.� F UI O �S FQW 2ZEW<O F gHG U < �T+v �v 3 p e c > J 5 V � tiZ F zw i cc O O w G a $S m W tt �J G3 -1 o O $ GW u F W O 43 0 m m m z F < / R 1 i / �3Q:gm i i•�_ �// / omor iz g yy�$��5 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. O5-20 NOTICE IS HEREBY GI V EN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 19, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Concept Planned Unit Development on property locatedat 1600PionmrTrail-Peterson Bluff. Applicant J. Edwin Chadwick, I.I.C. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing andexpresstheiropinions withrespect to this proposal. Rate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director Email: kaim nsonCk 1 hanh ¢can is Phone: 952-227-1139 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thursday, July 7, 2005; No. 4471) Affidavit of Publication Southwest Suburban Publishing State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly swom, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent of the publisher of the newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge of the facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requirements constituting qualification as a legal newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identified as No.�Z was published on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated in the attached Notice and said Notice is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. Said notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper specified. Printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, and is hereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: abcdefghuklmnopgrstuvwxyz Subscribed and sworn before me on this =day of Notary Public ��II��G vl• Laurie A. Hartmann GWEN K AACUENZ O) WTCY MUG - WWSOTA k^I Co^:nsu;;er Jat.31, n710 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... $22.00 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter ............................... $22.00 per column inch Rate actually charged for the above matter .............................................. $11.18 per column inch WANNCD 0, MEMORANDUM CITYOF /xTT 1 liiT 1 xxnTli TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager 7700 Market Boulevard FROM: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN55317 DATE: August 3, 2005 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 SUBJ: Concept Planned Unit Development on Property Located at Fax:952,227.1110 1600 Pioneer Trail; Peterson Bluff Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227,1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park A Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.2271110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227,1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone:952227.1300 Fax: 952.227,1310 Senior Center Phone, 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen. mn. us Please refer to the report for Peterson Bluff contained in Item 5 on this agenda. Attached is a map that depicts both the Peterson Bluff and Liberty on Bluff Creek developments in the 2005 MUSA area. SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. r CITY OF CHAKHASSEK 7700 Market Bled •PO Box W, Dlanhaxxxn. Mimooto 55517 (952)-727-1100 (952)-22/-1110 F. LO BEM ROOD R.W 0 150 3D0 wo HOWZ 14 SCME IN FEET ❑�❑ IGmley-Horn and Assoaates, Inc. ]YA YMIpEIBiY /.YE M6[ xkm ]1eM , M6 ka. -4-51" 51. Pxat Ykkm x MI. FM (01) CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2005 MUSA AREA EXPANSION IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 04-05 EAST -WEST COLLECTOR ROADWAY T700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952,227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.n7.1160 Fax: 952227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park A Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning A Natural Resources Phone:952227,1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone:952227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227,1125 Fax: 952,227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassennn.us • MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager 05 - as r Kate Aanenson AICP, Community Development Director August 8, 2005 Peterson Bluff EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ne. Conceptual PUD of 71 acres of property for 120 residential units — Peterson Bluff ACTION REQUIRED City Council approval requires a 4/5 of the entire City Council. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 19,2005, to review the proposed development. The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval with the conditions in the staff report. The summary and verbatim minutes are item I of the City Council packet for August 8, 2005. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the motion approving the Conceptual PUD approval as specified in the staff report dated July 19, 2005. ATTACHMENTS Planning Commission Staff Report Dated July 19, 2005. The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A geat place to live, work, and play. STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: Conceptual PUD of 71 acres of property for 120 residential units —Peterson Bluff. LOCATION: 1600 Pioneer Trail APPLICANT: J. Edwin Chadwick, LLC 11430 Zion Circle Bloomington, MN 55347 PRESENT ZONING: A2, Agricultural Estate Peterson Jacques Farm LLC 15900 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Offtce/IndustrU, Residential Medium Density, and Parks and Open Space ACREAGE: 71 acres —gross; 41.5 acres —net DENSITY: 1.7 units/acre — gross; 2.9 units/acre — net SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Concept Planned Unit Development Approval for a mixed residential development. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City has a high level of discretion in approving rezoning, PUD's and land use amendments because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning or PUD must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Planning Case 05-20 0 • Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sever Peterson is requesting to change the land use recommendation and the zoning of his property. Mr. Peterson has owned this property for four decades. The timing of the development of this area is driven by the improvements of Highway 212/312 and the City's comprehensive plan which anticipates that this area be developed between 2005-2010. The current land use on this site is Office/Industrial or Residential -Medium Density. The applicant request is for Residential -Low Density. This would require a land use amendment and rezoning. After conceptual approval, the applicant would have to pursue a Land Use Amendment, Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD), Conditional Use Permit for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District, and Site Plan Approval. The applicant is seeking conceptual PUD rezoning approval. A PUD is being requested because there will be a mix of low density housing types. The site is in the Bluff Creek Overlay district. The tool that the City has to cluster density out of the primary district is the PUD. As per the PUD ordinance, "approval of the concept statement shall not obligate the City to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district." The purpose of the concept plan is to outline the issues that the applicant will have to further develop in order to proceed with preliminary subdivision and rezoning to PUD. Staff has been working with the City's consultant on the AUAR road and utilities plan. There have been four meetings with the property owners in the area to review the design alternatives. It is the City's goal to have the infrastructure design approved by the City Council and the project ordered later this summer. Since the Peterson plan has been submitted, a different road alignment has been advanced. BACKGROUND Concept PUD - What is required? The intent of the concept plan is to get an early read from the commission and council without incurring a lot of expensive. Following are the requirements for conceptual PUD approval. Sec. 20-517 General Concept Plan. Chanhassen City Code (a) The general concept plan for a PUD provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to the city showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without incurring substantial cost. The plan shall include the following: (1) Overall gross and net density. (2) Identification of each lot size and lot width. (3) General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. (4) General location and extent of public and common open space. (5) General location and type of land uses and intensities of development. (6) Staging and time schedule for development. Planning Case 05-20 • • Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 3 (b) The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be filed with the city before the staff commences review. Approval of the concept statement shall not obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district. (c) The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures: (1) The developer meets with the city staff to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan, together with all supporting data. (3) The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and report its findings and make recommendations to the city council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official news- paper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days prior thereto to owners of land within five hundred (500) feet of the boundary of the property and an on -site notification sign erected. (4) Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning commis- sion, the city council shall consider the proposal. If the planning commission fails to make a report within sixty (60) days after receipt of the application, then the city council may proceed without the report. The council may approve the concept plan and attach such conditions, as it deems reasonable. Approval shall require a four -fifths vote of the entire council. Alternative Urban Areawide Review The conceptual approval of Town and Country required an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Rather than completing an EAW on just their site, an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was undertaken for the entire 2005 MUSA (Lower Bluff Creek) Metropolitan Urban Service Area. In reviewing the Lower Bluff Creek in a holistic setting, there were specific mitigation strategies that were established and they are listed below. Attached are the Complete Mitigation Initiatives. All of the recommendations are being incorporated in the design of the Lower Bluff Creek area. All property with the Lower Bluff Creek area will be assessed for the cost of the AUAR on a per acreage basis. The assessment for the AUAR will be paid at the time of plat recording. Specific strategies: 1. All permits identified in the AUAR (See question #8), as well as other necessary permits that may be required, will be secured by the City, or private parties as appropriate, for all development activities within the project area. 2. The City will follow its own regulations, ordinances, plans, and policies currently in place in the review and approval of all development activities within the project area. These items include The 2020 Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the official zoning and subdivision ordinances and the Bluff Creek Overlay ordinance. In addition, the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan, the Surface Water Management Plan, the Public Water Supply and Distribution System Plan (currently being revised) and the Comprehensive Sewer Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 4 Policy Plan will be used as technical resources in reviewing development activities and developing associated public infrastructure. 3. The City will extend public sewer and water services in a manner consistent with existing plans and policies for delivering trunk sanitary sewer service and watermain systems. Abandonment and closure of individual well and septic systems will follow existing local and state regulations. 4. The City will work with Mn/DOT and Carver County to periodically monitor traffic as generated from development within the project area as well as regional development initiatives that will affect the project area. Regional roadway improvements such as TH 212/312 and improvements to County Roads (Audubon Rd., Lyman Blvd., Pioneer Trail and future Powers Blvd. extension) will alter travel patterns. Performing traffic counts and monitoring traffic movements will help in facilitating future local roadway improvements. 5. The City will provide for adequate regional and local stormwater ponds and trunk facilities to protect water resources and water quality as guided by the Storm Water Management Plan and Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan. [National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II with individual site development] 6. The City will implement a development tracking mechanism to monitor development within the AUAR Project Area and its conformance with the development scenario. 7. The City will enforce its parkland dedication practices consistent with the goals and policies outlined in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan and the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan and the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. The City will follow existing zoning regulations including Floodplain Overlay (Article V), Wetland Protection (Article VI), Shoreland Management (Article VII), Bluff Protection (Article XXVIII) and Bluff Creek Overlay (Article XXXI) to protect natural and environmental resources from potential impacts resulting from the Development Scenario. The City will reference policies and strategies outlined in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan and Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan as technical resources during the review of specific development projects. ANALYSIS Rezoning — Land Use Rezoning of this property to PUD-R low density would be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. A land use amendment would be required. Approval of the land use amendment is subject to the Metropolitan Council approval. Staff support of the land use amendment is contingent upon maintaining approximately the same land use type percentages in the 2005 MUSA area. To date, there may be a request to locate industrial in the northeast portion of the site. With the update of the comprehensive plan in 1998, this property was given the two land use alternatives: Residential -Medium Density or Office/Industrial, as well as parks and open space Planning Case 05-20 • • Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 5 within the Bluff Creek Corridor. The reason it was given both potential land uses was that the site has been and is farmed and was adjacent to the Benardi (Town and County) property which was similarly guided. In calculating the City's 2020 land use designations, this 80-acre site was calculated at 50 percent industrial and 50 percent medium density residential. (The City's 2020 land use for industrial zoning was estimated at 1,229 acres (based on the change by Town and Country) or 8.3 percent of ultimate industrial. If this site were to be developed as all low density residential, there would 20 acres less of industrial land or a reduction from 1,209 or a percentage reduction of .015 percent to 8.1 percent. Based on the developer's calculations of net developable land (41.4 acres) with a maximum of 8 units an acre, the maximum number of units could be 332. The proposal is for 119 units which would yield a net density of 2.9 units an acre. According to the City Comprehensive Plan, net density less than 4 units an acre is low density. The current subdivision layout does not reflect the proposed alignment of the east west collector (Bluff Creek Boulevard). The road location may alter the property dwelling unit types. The proposed house types include 37 single-family homes, 34 twin homes and 48 quad homes. Land Use Commercial Office/Industrial Office Parks & Open Space Public/Semi-Public Residential Large Lot Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Mixed Use Undevelopable TOTALS 2020 Land Use Plan Existing Proposed Change % of Total 212 212 0 1.4% 1,229* 1,209 -20 8.1% 117 117 0 .8% 1,466 1,466 0 9.9% 1,242 1,242 0 8.8% 2,247 2,247 0 15.2% 5,473 5,493 +20 37.2% 669* 669 0 4.5% 398 398 0 2.6% 134 134 0 .9% 1,573 1,573 0 10.6% 14,760 acres 14,760 acres - 100% • adjusted based on the request from Town and Country Planning Case 05-20 • • Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 6 Chanhassen 2005 AUAR Project Magnitude Data LAND USE TOTAL NET PERCENTAGE MAXIMUM PROJECT DESIGNATION DEVELOPABLE OF INTENSITY OF MAGNITUDE ACRES LAND USE DEVELOPMENT DATA Medium Density 8 du/acre 528-1056 units Residential/Low 132 38 % Density Residential Medium Density 66 18% 8 du/acre 528 units Residential Office 17 5% 0.35 FAR 270,00 square feet Office/Industrial 70 20% 0.30 FAR 920,500 square feet Bluff Creek 45 13% Primary Zone Park 20 6% park Net Acres Total 350 100 % * Any District 112 school has been eliminated from the 2005 MUSA Bluff Creek Overlay District The Bluff Creek Corridor Study is a vision and planning document that has the following goals: 1. Protection, Restoration and Enhancement of Natural Resources. 2. Acquire land to create a continuous greenway along the creek from the Minnesota River to Lake Minnewashta. 3. Create development standards that manage upstream development such as mixed or cluster development, conservation easements and alternative zoning. 4. Develop educational watershed awareness program. 5. Develop a Natural Resources Plan. An overlay district was created for Bluff Creek with a primary and secondary corridor. The primary corridor boundary delineates a conservancy zone where undistributed conditions are desired. This is the area where any type of development and/or human activity directly impacts the morphological and biological characteristics of Bluff Creek. The secondary corridor boundary delineates a management zone. This is the area where development and/or urban activities directly affect the stream's upland ecosystem. The preservation and enhancement of this area will result in a better habitat and less strain on the stream. Management practices for this area focus on the preservation and enhancement of upland vegetation and the reduction of peak flows. This parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The primary and secondary corridor boundaries and the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor are not shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the primary and secondary corridors and the setback. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. The grading plan should be revised to eliminate alterations within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All structures must meet the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor. Planning Case 05-20 • • Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19,2005 Page 7 STREETS The proposed street alignments shown on the concept plan are generally consistent with the recommended alignments identified in "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. The concept plan identifies the TH 212 alignment as well as the east -west collector road that will ultimately connect Audubon Road (CSAH 15) to the proposed extension of Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17). Mniley-Horn has slightly modified the alignment of the portion of the east -west collector road through the Peterson property. The preliminary plat plans must incorporate the updated alignment of the east -west collector street and the proposed roundabout. The concept plan also identifies a "South Connector Roadway" that will connect the east -west collector to Pioneer Trail, consistent with the Report. The trunk roadway improvements described above shall be financed according to the recommendations within the Report, which includes special assessments that will be levied against this property. Right-of-way and street widths are not identified on the plan and will be reviewed with the preliminary plat submittal. Turn lane requirements and the typical street section shown in preliminary plans must be consistent with the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" recommendations. Trunk and lateral sanitary sewer and watermain improvements are required with the proposed project. A preliminary utility plan must be submitted with the preliminary plans and must comply with the trunk sanitary sewer and watermain design shown in the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report". Trunk sanitary sewer to serve the proposed subdivision shall extend from the existing trunk sanitary sewer located at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) and Audubon Road. The proposed trunk sanitary sewer between Lyman Boulevard and the proposed east -west collector road will be constructed by the City in conjunction with the 2005 MUSA Expansion Project, City Project #04-05. Trunk watermain improvements include the proposed 12" trunk watermain along Pioneer Trail, which will be constructed with the TH 212 design -build project. The "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" also specifies that 12" watermain be installed within the east -west collector road and within the "South Connector Roadway". Trunk utility improvements shall be financed according to the recommendations within the 2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report", which includes special assessments that will be levied against this property. Planning Case 05-20 • • Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 8 A pressure reducing valve is required within the development and must be shown on the preliminary utility plan. The City will reimburse the developer for the cost to furnish and install the pressure reducing valve. The City will also reimburse the developer the oversizing cost between the IT'trunk watermain and an 8" lateral watermain. The preliminary utility plan must include lateral storm sewer to service the proposed development. It will be the developer's responsibility to install and finance the installation of lateral watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer to serve the units within the proposed development. All proposed trunk and lateral utilities shall meet the City's minimum design requirements. GRADING Town & Country's proposed Liberty on Bluff Creek development lies west of the proposed Peterson Bluff PUD. The developer's engineer must work with Town & Country's engineer to minimize the amount and/or height of retaining walls to the maximum extent possible. 1 I all a i 1k I 1. The attached single-family townhome buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system if they are over 8,500 sq. ft. in floor area. For the purposes of this requirement, property lines do not constitute separate buildings and the area of basements and garages is included in the floor area threshold. 2. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire - resistive construction. 3. Each unit/lot must be provided with separate utility services. 4. Complete proposed site, grading and utility plans must be submitted to determine more detailed requirements. PARKS The Sever Peterson farm represents one of the properties located within the 2005 MUSA area that is currently being considered for development. The Peterson farm is situated on Bluff Creek and is proposed to be developed into residential housing. The number of units to be built is yet unknown, but initial estimates total 115 homes. The City's Comprehensive Park Plan calls for one acre of usable park space to be set aside for every 75 residents. The Peterson housing development will result in an estimated 300 new residents. In this scenario, the City's Comprehensive Plan would call for a four -acre park to be preserved and developed on this property. However, the Comprehensive Plan also recognizes that building a small park in every single family addition is undesirable and would result in an Planning Case 05-20 • • Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 9 unmanageable municipal park system. To this end, the plan calls for neighborhood parks to be centrally located within housing regions with a maximum distance of one mile between neighborhood parks. This pooling of resources and land in order to centrally locate parks in specific park service areas results in the efficient use of limited capital and long-term maintenance dollars. In the case of the Peterson Farm, the City is planning to service neighborhood park needs at a location directly north and across Bluff Creek from the farm. Therefore, it is anticipated that the City will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication on the Peterson parcel. A variety of pedestrian improvements will be incorporated into the Peterson development. Foremost is a ten -foot wide asphalt trail to be constructed within and paralleling the Bluff Creek Corridor. This important trail will most likely be constructed on the north side of Bluff Creek at this location. Additional pedestrian trails, sidewalks and trail connectors will be incorporated into the project as required. The planning and construction of these pedestrian improvements will, in most cases, be managed as private improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES WETLANDS Existing Wetlands A wetland delineation has not been submitted for the proposed project site. A report documenting the delineation of jurisdictional wetlands in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual must be submitted to the City as soon as possible. Wetland Replacement If wetland impacts are proposed, a wetland sequencing and mitigation plan must be submitted. Wetland replacement must occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. A wetland buffer 20 to 30 feet in width (with a minimum average of 20 feet) must be maintained around all Natural wetlands. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures must be set back 40 feet from the edge of the wetland buffer. The wetland buffer setback should be shown on the plans. BLUFFS Any areas on the property that meet the City's criteria for bluffs (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe) must be preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the Planning Case 05-20 • • Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 10 bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT The City of Chanhassen established the Bluff Creek Overlay District by ordinance in 1998 to protect the Bluff Creek Corridor, wetlands, bluffs and significant stands of mature trees through the use of careful site design and other low -impact practices. This parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The primary corridor boundary and the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor are not shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the primary corridor and the setback. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All structures must meet the 40- foot setback from the primary corridor. A conditional use permit will be required for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District corridor. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL Storm Water Management The concept plan does not show storm water management infrastructure. Storm water from the site shall be treated to National Urban Runoff Protection (NURP) standards. Post -development storm water discharge rates must not exceed pre -development rates. Easements Drainage and utility easements with a minimum width of 20 feet shall be provided over all utilities and drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as PVC and storm water infrastructure. Erosion and Sediment Control A complete Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) must be in place before applying for and receiving NPDES construction permit coverage from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Minimization of the amount of exposed soils on the site is needed; phasing of the development is recommended to limit the disturbed areas open. The creek and ravine systems throughout the development capture runoff from the erosive soils and significant slopes in some areas. Silt fence as the primary sediment control will not be sufficient. Surface Water Management Fees Based on approximately 39.8 acres at the medium density residential water quality and water quantity rates, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $245,009. Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (dewatering permit), Army Corps of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval. Planning Case 05-20 • • Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page I This site's agricultural use over the years has resulted in wooded areas existing along the edges of fields and in wetter areas. Nearly all the existing woods fall within the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Corridor. These areas will receive protection and help create an attractive buffer for the development as well as protect Bluff Creek. Landscaping requirements for the Peterson development include: 1. Based on the existing canopy coverage for the site, the developer will need to meet minimum planting requirements. 2. Bufferyard planting will be required along the south and west property lines. 3. Landscaping for the attached housing area should include native species for overstory and foundation plantings as well as non-native, ornamental selections. 4. Large groupings of materials will help extend the natural areas into the developed sites and create privacy for residents. 5. A strong, boulevard tree planting element is recommended within the development and required along any collector roads. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motion: "The Chanhassen City Council recommends approval the Concept PUD with the following conditions: 1. Any land use changes to Residential land use shall be based on another property requesting an Industrial land use with in the 2005 AUAR area. 2. Implementation of the AUAR recommendations. 3. The preliminary plat plans must incorporate the updated alignment of the east -west collector street and the proposed roundabout. 4. Turn lane requirements and the typical street section shown in preliminary plans must be consistent with the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" recommendations. 5. A preliminary utility plan must be submitted with the preliminary plans and must comply with the trunk sanitary sewer and watermain design shown in the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report". 6. A pressure reducing valve is required within the development and must be shown on the preliminary utility plan. Planning Case 05-20 • • Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 12 7. The preliminary utility plan must include lateral storm sewer to service the proposed development. 8. The developer's engineer must work with Town & Country's engineer to minimize the amount and/or height of retaining walls to the maximum extent possible. 9. The attached single-family townhome buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system if they are over 8,500 sq. ft. in floor area. For the purposes of this requirement property lines do not constitute separate buildings and the area of basements and garages is included in the floor area threshold. 10. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire - resistive construction. 11. Each unit/lot must be provided with separate utility services. 12. Complete proposed site, grading and utility plans must be submitted to determine more detailed requirements. 13. The City will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication on the Peterson parcel. 14. A report documenting the delineation of jurisdictional wetlands in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual must be submitted to the City. 15. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. A wetland buffer 20 to 30 feet in width (with a minimum average of 20 feet) must be maintained around all Natural wetlands. 16. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. 17. All structures must be set back 40 feet from the edge of the wetland buffer. The wetland buffer setback should be shown on the plans. 18. Any areas on the property that meet the City's criteria for bluffs (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe) must be shown on the plans and preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). 19. The primary corridor boundary and the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor are not shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the primary corridor and the setback. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 13 20. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All structures must meet the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor. 21. Based on the existing canopy coverage for the site, the developer will need to meet minimum planting requirements. 22. Bufferyard planting will be required along the south and west property lines. 23. Landscaping for the attached housing area should include native species for overstory and foundation plantings as well as non-native, ornamental selections. 24. Large groupings of materials will help extend the natural areas into the developed sites and create privacy for residents. 25. A strong, boulevard tree planting element is recommended within the development and required along any collector roads. 26. The development should establish viewsheds to be preserved as part of the development." ATTACHMENTS 1. Submittal letter and application. 2. Public hearing notice and property owners list. 3. Map of 2005 MUSA (see staff report attachment for Liberty on Bluff Creek). 4. Map of Land Use alternatives. 5. MnDOT letter dated June 30, 2005. 6. Development Concept A. g:\plan\.2005 planning ceses\05-20 peterson blufflpetetson bluff pud concept.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION rLCAOC rnrry i Applicant Name and Address: Rj-S Contact: Phone: Fax: 9 r2- Pac - o Y92 Email: reosfcr ea4) . / r b N Comprehe sive Plan Amendment Conditiona Use Permit Interim Use Permit Non-confo�fIjI�T�1ing Use Permit Co Me tfr k Planned Unit Development' Rezoning i Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review' Subdivision" Planning Case No. Owner Nam- --� ^ -' ' - Pe. ter56.. S4cMes Fu..., z- /S9oe t)r !'++N J-.1-3 Yy Contact: Year, Pe)- x-. Phone: 9s.)-937-/S/1Fax: 937 /r98 Email: .s pg6c, !Oo s D caeJ. c 6. Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign" - $75 + $100 Damage Deposit X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost"' - $50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB an TOTAL FEE $S An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. I I Twenty-six (26) full-$ize folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8'/z" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a di ital o in TIFF -Group 4 (*.tin format. Applicant to obtain notification sign from City of Chanhassen Public Works at 1591 Park Road and install upon submittal of completed application. $100 damage deposit to be refunded to applicant when sign is returned following City Council approval. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT NAME: PC S*. $/ LOCATION: Pio.getl h'u:a Ws� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: %near if y ?7 T//�N R13w a.a Yo `n".; $W'y /� NW /y leG?G T //6N R.✓J•J TOTAL ACREAGE: /n /erect/ /Zo 0 -/. do a4et4 74o WETLANDS PRESENT: _RYES NO PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: _ jw A, J isj e d : "- _dew „'s y re; ; j t� A". / PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Ada(,',4 ^ REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: %/.a , % Lew, f • -.IA4 if�r �Hei.+er. �raVlSia., 7Ce &fti/t. deve%,orha,F dew AVIC ceeOL,n dev leAM •i 426=sueee on 44c $iit This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Applicant of Fee Owner Date " Date �l SCANNED GAplanVor s\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 4/05 J. EDWIN CHADWICK, LLC 11430Zion Cirde Land and Farms - Bloomington, Minn tz 55437 Office (952) 853-2473 FAX (952) 886-0492 May 31, 2005 Ms. Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Peterson/Jacques Farm Information Letter Concept PUD Application to follow Dear Ms. Aanenson: This information letter is coming forth at this time after two -years of deliberation and extensive work with city staff, MNDOT and the AUAR team. Timms The letting of the Trunk Highway 212 project and the rapid design/build process being undertaken by the contractor makes this a very time sensitive project. Additionally, the AUAR study has been completed over the last couple of years, the feasibility report for infrastructure for the area is in place and there is a natural synergy of timely land planning and construction in concert with the large Highway 212. The City has indicated that there is a desire to undertake the East West Collector Street and bridge project shortly as well. Clearly the time is now. Ownership Background The property is owned by Mr. Sever Peterson and has a long history with the Peterson family. Mr. Peterson, has owned the farm for four decades and been farming it even longer, having worked with the thrashing crew as a boy assisting his father and grandfather. Due to this long attachment to this parcel of land, Mr. Peterson wants to see a style of development which is sensitive to the existing natural features and takes full advantage of the spectacular views on the site. Existing Land Use The site is currently a mix of farming uses and natural open space adjacent to and including parts of the Primary Bluff Creek Overlay Area. The topography has beautiful rolling hills and is one of the highest points in Chanhassen, resulting in spectacular views at many locations on the site. Adjacent Land Use The land to the west of the site is where Town and Country Homes, Inc. has proposed the Liberty Development, which is a neighborhood of approximately 350 mid -density residential townhomes. The land to the north of the Peterson farm is under contract with Pemtom and is intended for housing. The land to the east of the Peterson farm is controlled by Town and Country Homes, Inc. and is intended for residential development. The land to the south is part of the 2015 and 2020 MUSA expansion areas and also includes the soon -to -be -constructed Highway 212. This area is also near one of the possible new CR 41 river crossing corridors, however, the impact of that potential project, is questionable at this time due to the uncertainty of its final location and that the project is unfunded and therefore will likely not occur until after 2020, which should be long after full development of the 2005 MUSA has occurred. Access to Infrastructure The East-West Collector will run through the Peterson property in the northwest comer. This project calls for a nice sweeping boulevard and installation of sewer and water and is intended to start in 2005 or early 2006. The second major roadway improvement will be the road labeled in the AUAR as the Southern Connector Road which will run from the new East-West Collector to Pioneer Trail. Proposed Land Use The proposal is a residential planned unit development (PUD) on approximately 67 acres that is in concert with the residential component that is called forth by the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. The current guidance calls for development of 4-8 units per acre of housing and although the ultimate density is still being worked out in design, we anticipate it will be at the lower end of that density range. This reduced density is due in large part to the constraints of the topography and soils and also due to the desire to preserve and enhance the access to the existing natural resources and views. We want to work with the existing topography and resources rather than over -engineer the site and destroy much of its unique and special character. Issues of density transfer of units that could be built within Bluff Creek Overlay#1 but must be relocated out of the Primary district will be worked out over time with City Staff. The East-West Collector and Southern Collector roads are proposed to be utilized as buffers between areas of higher and lower densities. Higher densities are proposed on the west side of the site to remain compatible with the adjacent Town and Country Homes, Inc. proposed development and then the density drops off significantly as the topography rises in the east and adjacent to the Bluff Creek Overlay Area. Our engineer did look at the suitability of the topography and soils for non- residential purposes and determined that much of the site was unsuitable for non- residential uses due to topography and soil constraints. That report has been provided to City staff. The Peterson Family would be disappointed if this beautiful site was turned into a sea of parking lots, loading docks and retaining walls. Housing Product Types The land use design would call for three residential product types of varying size and density. The centerpiece of the project is an area of large lot executive home sites which would be overlooking or adjacent to the beautiful Bluff Creek Valley. These homes can be some of the premier homes in the area. There are more 20 acres of the Bluff Creek Park nature area which will preserved as part of this development and these homes will have wonderful views of this amenity as well as a view from the top of Chanhassen. The area west of the Southern Connector Road will be an area of 2-4 unit buildings which will provide a nice transition between Town and Country's offering to the west and the generous single-family homes to east. The area north of the East-West Collector and on the western side of the parcel which would be contiguous with Town and Country will have a higher density townhome product which would be similar to what is being offered by Town and Country in area immediately adjacent to it. This area would likely be physically connected to the Town and Country project through the extension of Town and Country's local street system. If the Town and Country project ends up reducing density adjacent to this area, it could be redesigned for more executive homes due to its proximity to the Bluff Creek Overlay and terrain. We look forward to receiving input from the City regarding this proposal so that we can then move forward with the more detailed design information that will be needed for the City Engineer's final roadway design on the East-West Collector and related infrastructure projects. Sincerely E. Chadwick nclosure Peterson Bluff Aerial View AF, M " m i 0 ° a co J N o mIX .0 C m C o� Q) U aa° � N FF1 0 x �o I CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on July 7, 2005, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Peterson Bluff Concept PUD — Planning Case 05-20 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this i n day of J �tJ , 2005. Notary jZ k� KIM TMEUWISSEN NotryPlic-Minnestao Eire1'10 : mwpa Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Unit Development — Peterson Proposal: Bluff Planning File: 05-20 Applicant: J. Edwin Chadwick LLC Property 1600 Pioneer Trail Location: I A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952-227-1139 Questions & or e-mail kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this Item will be available online at htto://206.10.76.6/weblink7 the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Welland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercialrndustrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Date & Time: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. Location: Citv Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Concept Planned Unit Development — Peterson Proposal: Bluff Planning File: 05-20 Applicant: J. Edwin Chadwick LLC Property 1600 Pioneer Trail Location: A location map Is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: • What Happens at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Kate Aanenson at 952-227-1139 Questions & or e-mail kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to Comments: submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online at htto://206.10.76.6/weblink7 the Thursday rior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alters Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokespersorJrepresentative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, lease contact the Plannina Staff person named on the notification. This map is neither a legally recorded nap nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in vanws city, county, state and federal offices and outer sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not wamant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. g errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227.1107. The preceding disclaimer is pmvitlecl pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and etpresay waives all dams, and agrees to defend, indemnity, and hdtl hamblees the City from any and all claim brought by User, its employees or agents, or Mind parties which ans , out of the users access or use of data provided. C This map is neither a legally recorded map not a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in vanws city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not woman) that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or directive or precision in the depiction of geographic features, ff enors or discrepancies are found pease contact 952-227-1107. no precetling disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03. Subd. 21 (2000). and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shell not be liable for any damages, and etpressly waves all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify. and hdd hamiess the City from any and all dams brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arse out of the users access or use of data provided. «NAME» «NAME1 p ADD1 n 1ADD2» «CITY» « STATE» «ZIP»-aZIP4)) „Next Record,,,, NAME,, i,NAME1,, ,,ADD11) «ADD2» CITY,, „STATE)) „ZIP»-„ZIP4» Public Hearg Notification Area (500 feet) Peterson Bluff Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-20 1600 P ioneer Trail City of Chanhassen u • GAYLE O & LOIS J DEGLER TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 1630 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9402 PETERSONJACOUES FARM LAND CO C/O SEVERIN H PETERSON JR 15900 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347 -4047 G&M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP 24760 CEDAR POINT RD NEW PRAGUE , MN 56071 -4056 AURORA INVESTMENTS LLC 5215 EDINA INDUST BLVD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS . MN 55439 -3023 NDI MINNESOTA LLC C/O HOVSTONE PROPERTIES MN LLC 7615 SMETANA LN SUITE 160 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346 -4700 ARTHUR BJOHNSON 17448 FRONDELL CT EDEN PRAIRIE. MN 55347 -3416 FOX PROPERTIES LP 27990 SMITHTOWN RD EXCELSIOR. MN 55331 -7911 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG ST PAUL , MN 55155 -1801 KLINGELHUTZ CONSTRUCTION CO 350 HWY 212E CHASKA, MN 55318 -2144 BLUFF CREEK GOLF ASSOC CITY OF CHASKA DAMES W HEISEL 1025 CREEKWOOD DR C/O NOEL GRACZYK C/O C/O EAST HWY 212 CHASKA, MN 55318 -9647 1 CITY HALL PLAZA 350 Po 5 BOX 89 CHASKA, MN 55318 -1962 CHASKA, MN 5018 -0089 Minnesota Deament of Transportation 0 a TO Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville MN 55113-3174 June 30, 2005 Ms. Kate Aaneson Community Development Director City of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317-1447 SUBJECT: Peterson Farm Mn/DOT Review # S05-063 New TH 212 corridor, North side, East of CSAH 17 Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section: 1010 Dear Ms. Aaneson: FICEIVI" JUL 01 20 CITY OF CHANHASSE Thank you for submitting the above referenced site plan. Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the Peterson Farm Site Plan, and have the following comments. The proposed development will need to maintain existing drainage rates. The City or project developer will need to submit before/after hydraulic computations for both 10 and 100 year rainfall events verifying that all existing drainage patterns and systems affecting Mn/DOT right of way will be perpetuated. Stormwater ponds adjacent to Mn/DOT right-of-way shall be designed to a 100-year-24-hour storm event with 2 feet of freeboard. Please direct questions concerning these issues to Julie Whitcher (651-634-2080) of Mn/DOT's Water Resources section. ( Julie.whitcher(nDdot.state.mn.us ) Any use of or work within or affecting Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsup/utility . Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Keith Van Wagner (651-582-1443), or Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Review Coordinator Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's 30-day review and response process to development proposals. ff you happen to An equal opportunity employer know the property identification number, please include that information with your submittals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions, please feel free to call myself at 651-634-2083, or Tod Sherman at 651-582-1548. Voigt Transportation Planner Copy: Dave Drealan, Carver County Planning Department n u w o a v r Jr N W 0m� r� mm W WO P pY\ N4WW4„1 POOya WLLWW4� U W�P Nn44Pv ¢mom y�nIWi4W� r <U¢2 00"W FVw¢� OO..w i maoJ ou4''cZaii �naoJ NSgKq JFQ60~ m��Ym 1atU~�- Q.. VIR gpPV1Fw .. Vlh �pml/1 � zaoa rcpaOx iiaou ¢opox W 8Q3WF iniias� OQ�wr iniia�5 U UW YJ U UW pr YJJ Z_u S2K 3� r02¢U1 co Az OOaQ2X 2`-'UZ r 00<W JJ o 20¢Vi2Z JJ O �YKN33 W O 2 i wi MA I L finTj m k c i C�� s's Peterson Deve Chanhassen, MN oleo an. M.L W.. ewV I1m. w+..ewe.. 16Y eew lopment Concept C MSITE DATA PROPOSED RSF ZONING UNIT COUNT: 56 UNITS LAND AREA: ±53.6 ACRES (INCLUDES ±26.8 ACRES OF BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 1.04 UNITS/ACRE LOT REOUIREMENTS: 15,000 SF MINIMUM LOT SIZE FRONT YARD SETBACK: 30 FEET REAR YARD SETBACK:30 FEET SIDE YARD SETBACK: 10 FEET MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE:90 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT: THREE (3) STORIES/FORTY (40) FEET PROPOSED R-4 ZONING UNIT COUNT: 32 UNITS LAND AREA: t14.3 ACRES INCLUDES f5.1 ACRES OF BLUFF REEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 2.23 UNITS/ACRE LOT REQUIREMENTS: 15,000 SF MINIMUM LOT SIZE FRONT YARD SETBACK: 30 FEET REAR YARD SETBACK:30 FEET SIDE YARD SETBACK: 10 FEET MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE:50 FEET (TWO FAMILY MAXIMUM HEIGHT: THREE (3) STORIES/FORTY 40) FEET OUTLOT #1: t3.13 ACRES OUTLOT #2: t2.33 ACRES (OUTLOTS #1 AND #2 ARE NOT INCLUDED LEGEND OVERALL PARCEL IN THE ABOVE COMPUTATIONS) ® FLOOD ZONE A WETLAND LIMITS -..- BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT (t31.91 AC.) (INCLUDES AREAS STAKED BY THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN) ....... BLUFF CREEK SECONDARY OVERLAY DISTRICT (t49.84 AC.) BLUFF CREEK BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT NET DEVELOPABLE AREA 0 FLOOD ZONE A PROPOSED MNDOT R.O.W. (PER MN/DOT DEC. 2004) © EXCLUDING EXISTING PIONEER TRAIL R.O.W. (f43.12 AC.) EXISTING WETLAND (f0.62 AC.) SG1lE IN FEET Date: August 3, 2005 1 CITY OF CHARBASSIXT 00 Mash BiMo7a (952)-227-1100 (952)-227-1110 Fax LEGEND j MM WEIL.tND I ' j OHJIEAT®YrEiIAID TIE C i MAl T10 MAN IL000 h 0 150 500 800 XORRNTAL I SCALE N -_-- ❑_❑ KmleyHorn m and Associates, Inc. uw umlwa A� w .suit a.s 'E. ro. (earl s.e-xin 1'All ..x. A .1l ��.% Na. (sp aa5-5f18 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2005 MUSA AREA EXPANSION IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 04-05 EAST -WEST COLLECTOR ROADWAY Tentative Agenda Chanhassen Planning Commission Tuesday, August 16, 2005, 1:00 p.m. �v Fountain Conference Room, 7700 Market Boulevard WORK SESSION I. S59tlCT�1ZFHfl-��ii�1i�1�P OISLI ^Pr "�� b. -rou v C (t � NOTE: Planning Commission meetings are scheduled to end by I0:30 p.m. at outlined in the official by-laws. We will make every attempt to complete the hearing for each item on the agenda. If, however, this does not appear to be possible, the Chairperson will notify those present and offer rescheduling options. Items thus pulled from consideration will be listed first on the agenda at the next Commission meeting. icy ,)A &�N:`d� U ! 00r - 4 USA cell I , �, V r(Fe1 7 CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL: LOCATION APPLICANT: PC DATE: July 19, 2005 ❑ CC DATE: August 8, 2005 REVIEW DEADLINE: August 16, 2005 CASE #: 05-20 BY: Aanenson 0-41 Conceptual PUD of 71 acres of property for 120 residential units — Peterson Bluff. 1600 Pioneer Trail J. Edwin Chadwick, LLC 11430 Zion Circle Bloomington, MN 55347 PRESENT ZONING: A2, Agricultural Estate Peterson Jacques Farm LLC 15900 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Office/Industrial, Residential Medium Density, and Parks and Open Space ACREAGE: 71 acres — gross; 41.5 acres — net DENSITY: 1.7 unitstacre — gross; 2.9 units/acre — net SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Concept Planned Unit Development Approval for a mixed residential development. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City has a high level of discretion in approving rezoning, PUD's and land use amendments because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning or PUD must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Location Map Peterson Bluff Concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-20 1600 P ioneer Trail City of Chanhassen 0 gym, Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sever Peterson is requesting to change the land use recommendation and the zoning of his property. Mr. Peterson has owned this property for four decades. The timing of the development of this area is driven by the improvements of Highway 212/312 and the City's comprehensive plan which anticipates that this area be developed between 2005-2010. The current land use on this site is Office/Industrial or Residential -Medium Density. The applicant request is for Residential -Low Density. This would require a land use amendment and rezoning. After conceptual approval, the applicant would have to pursue a Land Use Amendment, Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD), Conditional Use Permit for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District, and Site Plan Approval. The applicant is seeking conceptual PUD rezoning approval. A PUD is being requested because there will be a mix of low density housing types. The site is in the Bluff Creek Overlay district. The tool that the City has to cluster density out of the primary district is the PUD. As per the PUD ordinance, "approval of the concept statement shall not obligate the City to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district." The purpose of the concept plan is to outline the issues that the applicant will have to further develop in order to proceed with preliminary subdivision and rezoning to PUD. Staff has been working with the City's consultant on the AUAR road and utilities plan. There have been four meetings with the property owners in the area to review the design alternatives. It is the City's goal to have the infrastructure design approved by the City Council and the project ordered later this summer. Since the Peterson plan has been submitted, a different road alignment has been advanced. BACKGROUND Concept PUD - What is required? The intent of the concept plan is to get an early read from the commission and council without incurring a lot of expensive. Following are the requirements for conceptual PUD approval. Sec. 20-517 General Concept Plan. Chanhassen City Code (a) The general concept plan for a PUD provides an opportunity for the applicant to submit a plan to the city showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development without incurring substantial cost. The plan shall include the following: (1) Overall gross and net density. (2) Identification of each lot size and lot width. (3) General location of major streets and pedestrian ways. (4) General location and extent of public and common open space. (5) General location and type of land uses and intensities of development. (6) Staging and time schedule for development. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 3 (b) The tentative written consent of all property owners within the proposed PUD shall be filed with the city before the staff commences review. Approval of the concept statement shall not obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to rezone the property to a planned unit development district. (c) The final acceptance of land uses is subject to the following procedures: (1) The developer meets with the city staff to discuss the proposed developments. (2) The applicant shall file the concept stage application and concept plan, together with all supporting data. (3) The planning commission shall conduct a hearing and report its findings and make recommendations to the city council. Notice of the hearing shall consist of a legal property description, description of request, and be published in the official news- paper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, written notification of the hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days prior thereto to owners of land within five hundred (500) feet of the boundary of the property and an on -site notification sign erected. (4) Following the receipt of the report and recommendations from the planning commis- sion, the city council shall consider the proposal. If the planning commission fails to make a report within sixty (60) days after receipt of the application, then the city council may proceed without the report. The council may approve the concept plan and attach such conditions, as it deems reasonable. Approval shall require a four -fifths vote of the entire council. Alternative Urban Areawide Review The conceptual approval of Town and Country required an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Rather than completing an EAW on just their site, an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was undertaken for the entire 2005 MUSA (Lower Bluff Creek) Metropolitan Urban Service Area. In reviewing the Lower Bluff Creek in a holistic setting, there were specific mitigation strategies that were established and they are listed below. Attached are the Complete Mitigation Initiatives. All of the recommendations are being incorporated in the design of the Lower Bluff Creek area. All property with the Lower Bluff Creek area will be assessed for the cost of the AUAR on a per acreage basis. The assessment for the AUAR will be paid at the time of plat recording. Specific strategies: 1. All permits identified in the AUAR (See question #8), as well as other necessary permits that may be required, will be secured by the City, or private parties as appropriate, for all development activities within the project area. 2. The City will follow its own regulations, ordinances, plans, and policies currently in place in the review and approval of all development activities within the project area. These items include The 2020 Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the official zoning and subdivision ordinances and the Bluff Creek Overlay ordinance. In addition, the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan, the Surface Water Management Plan, the Public Water Supply and Distribution System Plan (currently being revised) and the Comprehensive Sewer Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 4 Policy Plan will be used as technical resources in reviewing development activities and developing associated public infrastructure. 3. The City will extend public sewer and water services in a manner consistent with existing plans and policies for delivering trunk sanitary sewer service and watermain systems. Abandonment and closure of individual well and septic systems will follow existing local and state regulations. 4. The City will work with Mn/DOT and Carver County to periodically monitor traffic as generated from development within the project area as well as regional development initiatives that will affect the project area. Regional roadway improvements such as TH 212/312 and improvements to County Roads (Audubon Rd., Lyman Blvd., Pioneer Trail and future Powers Blvd. extension) will alter travel patterns. Performing traffic counts and monitoring traffic movements will help in facilitating future local roadway improvements. 5. The City will provide for adequate regional and local stormwater ponds and trunk facilities to protect water resources and water quality as guided by the Storm Water Management Plan and Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan. [National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II with individual site development] 6. The City will implement a development tracking mechanism to monitor development within the AUAR Project Area and its conformance with the development scenario. 7. The City will enforce its parkland dedication practices consistent with the goals and policies outlined in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan and the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan and the requirements of the subdivision ordinance. The City will follow existing zoning regulations including Floodplain Overlay (Article V), Wetland Protection (Article VI), Shoreland Management (Article VII), Bluff Protection (Article XXVIII) and Bluff Creek Overlay (Article XXXI) to protect natural and environmental resources from potential impacts resulting from the Development Scenario. The City will reference policies and strategies outlined in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan and Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resource Management Plan as technical resources during the review of specific development projects. ANALYSIS Rezonine — Land Use Rezoning of this property to PUD-R low density would be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. A land use amendment would be required. Approval of the land use amendment is subject to the Metropolitan Council approval. Staff support of the land use amendment is contingent upon maintaining approximately the same land use type percentages in the 2005 MUSA area. To date, there may be a request to locate industrial in the northeast portion of the site. With the update of the comprehensive plan in 1998, this property was given the two land use alternatives: Residential -Medium Density or Office/Industrial, as well as parks and open space Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 5 within the Bluff Creek Corridor. The reason it was given both potential land uses was that the site has been and is farmed and was adjacent to the Benardi (Town and County) property which was similarly guided. In calculating the City's 2020 land use designations, this 80-acre site was calculated at 50 percent industrial and 50 percent medium density residential. (The City's 2020 land use for industrial zoning was estimated at 1,229 acres (based on the change by Town and Country) or 8.3 percent of ultimate industrial. If this site were to be developed as all low density residential, there would 20 acres less of industrial land or a reduction from 1,209 or a percentage reduction of .015 percent to 8.1 percent. Based on the developer's calculations of net developable land (41.4 acres) with a maximum of 8 units an acre, the maximum number of units could be 332. The proposal is for 119 units which would yield a net density of 2.9 units an acre. According to the City Comprehensive Plan, net density less than 4 units an acre is low density. The current subdivision layout does not reflect the proposed alignment of the east west collector (Bluff Creek Boulevard). The road location may alter the property dwelling unit types. The proposed house types include 37 single-family homes, 34 twin homes and 48 quad homes. 2020 Land Use Plan % of Land Use Existine Proposed Change Total Commercial 212 212 0 1.4% Office/Industrial 1,229* 1,209 -20 8.1% Office 117 117 0 .8% Parks & Open Space 1,466 1,466 0 9.9% Public/Semi-Public 1,242 1,242 0 8.8% Residential Large Lot 2,247 2,247 0 15.2% Residential Low Density 5,473 51493 +20 37.2% Residential Medium Density 669* 669 0 4.5% Residential High Density 398 398 0 2.6% Mixed Use 134 134 0 .9% Undevelopable 1,573 1,573 0 10.6% TOTALS 14,760 acres 14,760 acres - 100% * adjusted based on the request from Town and Country Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 6 Chanhassen 2005 AUAR Project Magnitude Data LAND USE TOTAL NET PERCENTAGE MAXIMUM PROJECT DESIGNATION DEVELOPABLE OF INTENSITY OF MAGNITUDE ACRES LAND USE DEVELOPMENT DATA Medium Density 8 du/acre 528-1056 units ResidentiallLow 132 38 % Density Residential Medium Density 66 18% 8 du/acre 528 units Residential Office 17 5% 0.35 FAR 270,00 square feet Office/Industrial 70 20% 0.30 FAR 920,500 square feet Bluff Creek 45 13% Primary Zone Park 20 6% park Net Acres Total350 100% ' Any District 112 school has been eliminated from the 2005 MUSA Bluff Creek Overlay District The Bluff Creek Corridor Study is a vision and planning document that has the following goals: 1. Protection, Restoration and Enhancement of Natural Resources. 2. Acquire land to create a continuous greenway along the creek from the Minnesota River to Lake Minnewashta. 3. Create development standards that manage upstream development such as mixed or cluster development, conservation easements and alternative zoning. 4. Develop educational watershed awareness program. 5. Develop a Natural Resources Plan. An overlay district was created for Bluff Creek with a primary and secondary corridor. The primary corridor boundary delineates a conservancy zone where undistributed conditions are desired. This is the area where any type of development and/or human activity directly impacts the morphological and biological characteristics of Bluff Creek. The secondary corridor boundary delineates a management zone. This is the area where development and/or urban activities directly affect the stream's upland ecosystem. The preservation and enhancement of this area will result in a better habitat and less strain on the stream. Management practices for this area focus on the preservation and enhancement of upland vegetation and the reduction of peak flows. This parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The primary and secondary corridor boundaries and the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor are not shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the primary and secondary corridors and the setback. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. The grading plan should be revised to eliminate alterations within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 7 structures must meet the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor. STREETS The proposed street alignments shown on the concept plan are generally consistent with the recommended alignments identified in "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" prepared by Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. The concept plan identifies the TH 212 alignment as well as the east -west collector road that will ultimately connect Audubon Road (CSAH 15) to the proposed extension of Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17). Kimley-Horn has slightly modified the alignment of the portion of the east -west collector road through the Peterson property. The preliminary plat plans must incorporate the updated alignment of the east -west collector street and the proposed roundabout. The concept plan also identifies a "South Connector Roadway" that will connect the east -west collector to Pioneer Trail, consistent with the Report. The trunk roadway improvements described above shall be financed according to the recommendations within the Report, which includes special assessments that will be levied against this property. Right-of-way and street widths are not identified on the plan and will be reviewed with the preliminary plat submittal. Turn lane requirements and the typical street section shown in preliminary plans must be consistent with the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" recommendations. Trunk and lateral sanitary sewer and watermain improvements are required with the proposed project. A preliminary utility plan must be submitted with the preliminary plans and must comply with the trunk sanitary sewer and watermain design shown in the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report". Trunk sanitary sewer to serve the proposed subdivision shall extend from the existing trunk sanitary sewer located at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard (CSAH 18) and Audubon Road. The proposed trunk sanitary sewer between Lyman Boulevard and the proposed east -west collector road will be constructed by the City in conjunction with the 2005 MUSA Expansion Project, City Project #04-05. Trunk watermain improvements include the proposed 12" trunk watermain along Pioneer Trail, which will be constructed with the TH 212 design -build project. The "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" also specifies that 12" watermain be installed within the east -west collector road and within the "South Connector Roadway". Trunk utility improvements shall be financed according to the recommendations within the 2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report", which includes special assessments that will be levied against this property. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 8 A pressure reducing valve is required within the development and must be shown on the preliminary utility plan. The City will reimburse the developer for the cost to furnish and install the pressure reducing valve. The City will also reimburse the developer the oversizing cost between the 12" trunk watermain and an 8" lateral watermain. The preliminary utility plan must include lateral storm sewer to service the proposed development. It will be the developer's responsibility to install and finance the installation of lateral watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer to serve the units within the proposed development. All proposed trunk and lateral utilities shall meet the City's minimum design requirements. GRADING Town & Country's proposed Liberty on Bluff Creek development lies west of the proposed Peterson Bluff PUD. The developer's engineer must work with Town & Country's engineer to minimize the amount and/or height of retaining walls to the maximum extent possible. I • I 1' • I I 1. The attached single-family townhome buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system if they are over 8,500 sq. ft. in floor area. For the purposes of this requirement, property lines do not constitute separate buildings and the area of basements and garages is included in the floor area threshold. 2. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire - resistive construction. 3. Each unit/lot must be provided with separate utility services. 4. Complete proposed site, grading and utility plans must be submitted to determine more detailed requirements. PARKS The Sever Peterson farm represents one of the properties located within the 2005 MUSA area that is currently being considered for development. The Peterson farm is situated on Bluff Creek and is proposed to be developed into residential housing. The number of units to be built is yet unknown, but initial estimates total 115 homes. The City's Comprehensive Park Plan calls for one acre of usable park space to be set aside for every 75 residents. The Peterson housing development will result in an estimated 300 new residents. In this scenario, the City's Comprehensive Plan would call for a four -acre park to be preserved and developed on this property. However, the Comprehensive Plan also recognizes that building a small park in every single family addition is undesirable and would result in an Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 9 unmanageable municipal park system. To this end, the plan calls for neighborhood parks to be centrally located within housing regions with a maximum distance of one mile between neighborhood parks. This pooling of resources and land in order to centrally locate parks in specific park service areas results in the efficient use of limited capital and long-term maintenance dollars. In the case of the Peterson Farm, the City is planning to service neighborhood park needs at a location directly north and across Bluff Creek from the farm. Therefore, it is anticipated that the City will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication on the Peterson parcel. A variety of pedestrian improvements will be incorporated into the Peterson development. Foremost is a ten -foot wide asphalt trail to be constructed within and paralleling the Bluff Creek Corridor. This important trail will most likely be constructed on the north side of Bluff Creek at this location. Additional pedestrian trails, sidewalks and trail connectors will be incorporated into the project as required. The planning and construction of these pedestrian improvements will, in most cases, be managed as private improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES WETLANDS Existing Wetlands A wetland delineation has not been submitted for the proposed project site. A report documenting the delineation of jurisdictional wetlands in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual must be submitted to the City as soon as possible. Wetland Replacement If wetland impacts are proposed, a wetland sequencing and mitigation plan must be submitted. Wetland replacement must occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420). A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. A wetland buffer 20 to 30 feet in width (with a minimum average of 20 feet) must be maintained around all Natural wetlands. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. All structures must be set back 40 feet from the edge of the wetland buffer. The wetland buffer setback should be shown on the plans. BLUFFS Any areas on the property that meet the City's criteria for bluffs (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe) must be preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 10 bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT The City of Chanhassen established the Bluff Creek Overlay District by ordinance in 1998 to protect the Bluff Creek Corridor, wetlands, bluffs and significant stands of mature trees through the use of careful site design and other low -impact practices. Tbis parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The primary corridor boundary and the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor are not shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the primary corridor and the setback. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the fast 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All structures must meet the 40- foot setback from the primary corridor. A conditional use permit will be required for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District corridor. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL Storm Water Management The concept plan does not show storm water management infrastructure. Storm water from the site shall be treated to National Urban Runoff Protection (NURP) standards. Post -development storm water discharge rates must not exceed pre -development rates. Easements Drainage and utility easements with a minimum width of 20 feet shall be provided over all utilities and drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands, wetland mitigation areas, buffer areas used as PVC and storm water infrastructure. Erosion and Sediment Control A complete Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) must be in place before applying for and receiving NPDES construction permit coverage from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Minimization of the amount of exposed soils on the site is needed; phasing of the development is recommended to limit the disturbed areas open. The creek and ravine systems throughout the development capture runoff from the erosive soils and significant slopes in some areas. Silt fence as the primary sediment control will not be sufficient. Surface Water Management Fees Based on approximately 39.8 acres at the medium density residential water quality and water quantity rates, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $245,009. Other Agencies The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (dewatering permit), Army Corps of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 11 FORESTRY This site's agricultural use over the years has resulted in wooded areas existing along the edges of fields and in wetter areas. Nearly all the existing woods fall within the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Corridor. These areas will receive protection and help create an attractive buffer for the development as well as protect Bluff Creek. Landscaping requirements for the Peterson development include: 1. Based on the existing canopy coverage for the site, the developer will need to meet minimum planting requirements. 2. Bufferyard planting will be required along the south and west property lines. 3. Landscaping for the attached housing area should include native species for overstory and foundation plantings as well as non-native, ornamental selections. 4. Large groupings of materials will help extend the natural areas into the developed sites and create privacy for residents. 5. A strong, boulevard tree planting element is recommended within the development and required along any collector roads. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval the Concept PUD with the following conditions: 1. Any land use changes to Residential land use shall be based on another property requesting an Industrial land use with in the 2005 AUAR area. 2. Implementation of the AUAR recommendations. 3. The preliminary plat plans must incorporate the updated alignment of the east -west collector street and the proposed roundabout. 4. Turn lane requirements and the typical street section shown in preliminary plans must be consistent with the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" recommendations. 5. A preliminary utility plan must be submitted with the preliminary plans and must comply with the trunk sanitary sewer and watermain design shown in the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report". 6. A pressure reducing valve is required within the development and must be shown on the preliminary utility plan. Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 12 7. The preliminary utility plan must include lateral storm sewer to service the proposed development. 8. The developer's engineer must work with Town & Country's engineer to minimize the amount and/or height of retaining walls to the maximum extent possible. 9. The attached single-family townhome buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system if they are over 8,500 sq. ft. in floor area. For the purposes of this requirement property lines do not constitute separate buildings and the area of basements and garages is included in the floor area threshold. 10. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire - resistive construction. 11. Each unittlot must be provided with separate utility services. 12. Complete proposed site, grading and utility plans must be submitted to determine more detailed requirements. 13. The City will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication on the Peterson parcel. 14. A report documenting the delineation of jurisdictional wetlands in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual must be submitted to the City. 15. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. A wetland buffer 20 to 30 feet in width (with a minimum average of 20 feet) must be maintained around all Natural wetlands. 16. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. 17. All strictures must be set back 40 feet from the edge of the wetland buffer. The wetland buffer setback should be shown on the plans. 18. Any areas on the property that meet the City's criteria for bluffs (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe) must be shown on the plans and preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). 19. The primary corridor boundary and the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor are not shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the primary corridor and the setback. 20. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All structures must meet the 40-foot setback from the Planning Case 05-20 Peterson Bluff Concept PUD July 19, 2005 Page 13 primary corridor. 21. Based on the existing canopy coverage for the site, the developer will need to meet minimum planting requirements. 22. Bufferyard planting will be required along the south and west property lines. 23. Landscaping for the attached housing area should include native species for overstory and foundation plantings as well as non-native, ornamental selections. 24. Large groupings of materials will help extend the natural areas into the developed sites and create privacy for residents. 25. A strong, boulevard tree planting element is recommended within the development and required along any collector roads. 26. The development should establish viewsheds to be preserved as part of the development." ATTACHMENTS 1. Submittal letter and application. 2. Public hearing notice and property owners list. 3. Map of 2005 MUSA (see staff report attachment for Liberty on Bluff Creek). 4. Map of Land Use alternatives. 5. MnDOT letter dated June 30, 2005. 6. Development Concept A. g'%plan\2005 planning case %05-20 pet rs blufflpeterson bluff pud conMt.doc • °- a "0 Planning Commission Meeting —July 19, 2005 83. The buildings will be required to be designed by an architect and engineer as determined by the Building Official. 84. The developer and or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Kevin Clark: Chair and commission, thank you very much. Appreciate your confidence in us and we're looking forward to continuing to contribute to this kind of feedback we get nationally and locally and we're glad to be part of it in Chanhassen so thank you very much. Appreciate it. McDonald: Thank you. PUBLIC HEARING: CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1600 PIONEER TRAIL, PETERSON BLUFF. APPLICANT, J. EDWIN CHADWICK, LLC. PLANNING CASE NO.05-20. Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item. McDonald: Okay, who wants to start? Anyone have any questions? Keefe: Kate, I've got a question. In regards to the land use, 2020 Land Use Plan. With this change we're going to see a reduction in the planned office industrial and an increase in the residential, low density residential. Can you tell us sort of over a period of time what happens in regards to if we get a little bit out of whack. What is the potential down side to it? And then it's kind of early in the process where we'd have a fair amount of time to make up the variances but what happens if we don't get it? Aanenson: Well one of the things that we're working on right now, which we have guided that we believe will probably go more in the industrial, will be the old 212 corridor. We're looking at that. We're doing the corridor study as 212 becomes 312 and the old 212 is turning over to the County, the engineering department and planning staff is looking at an access corridor and how we provide good access for that because that we see also as a office industrial corridor. As we update the comprehensive plan we'll be looking at those pieces. We just found out today we did get funding from the State to study the 101. One of the major problems we have in the city is going north to south. Bob's ... tomorrow with the 41 river crossing. That's a heated issue. You know whether that's actually going to go to provide access again getting people over the river, so we're looking at that and how that provides access for some of that southern area to provide additional industrial. So that's something we'll be looking at. We'll be updating the comp plan. It has to be done in 2008. We'll be starting on that process next year. Kind of looking at taking a tally of where we are to date. Are some of our assumptions valid? Invalid and a lot of it has to do hopefully when you look at the tax, how the state's, and that's fluid right now. Industrial's softer than multifamily. Multifamily takes a little bit more so that's always a moving target too so we'll be looking at that and giving ... as we move forward. 32 i Planning Commission Meeting — July 19, 2005 Keefe: What's the down side for not hitting your target? You know I mean what happens? Is it a revenue issue or what is it in terms of, say we end up with more residential than... Aanenson: Well, sometimes it's the people perceive. There's a different service demand in different product types so really what it comes down to is do you need more schools or do you need more ... for police and fire. Some of those sort of things that actually comes with industrial you have lots of demand on service. You may have more demand on a lot of services that the city sells so you know it's those sort of issues. You'd have to provide schooling, and you know we've got the school district numbers. The Chaska district does a very thorough study, we just recently updated their's, looking at product type and single family does produce the most number of children as opposed to other products, attached or otherwise apartments. Single family in general is the highest number of children located, so the ... part of it's demand. Those sort of things so it's just the service call out, those sort of things. Keefe: So the guts of this change, you're looking at point, was it .4 percent increase or something along those lines in regards to the plan. Aanenson: Yeah, right. And again looking at this, when we put the numbers together and updated the comprehensive plan we compared ourselves to other similar situated cities size in scale. Whether that be Chaska, Savage, kind of what percentage they have industrial. You know ultimately it's the model that this city wants to be and where that, how that plays out. But again trying to be responsible to the overall economic stability of the community. Providing enough commercial to meet those needs. Some industrial and different housing styles. Keefe: Thank you. Papke: Just kind of following up on that. Question on page 6. The table for the AUAR. Is this the total net developable acres, is this before or after Town and Country and Peterson Bluffs? Aanenson: That's before. Papke: This is before. Aanenson: So what we did is we maximized that so what we said, total residential units in that area can be 1,500. Papke: Okay. So if I understand this correctly, the total net developable acres initially drops industrial with 70 acres and between Town and Country and Peterson Bluffs we've lost 60, so we're left with 10? Aanenson: No, it's actually 30. There's still some on the Degler piece, which is. Papke: Okay. Because you know, according to the staff report we lose 20 with Peterson Bluffs. We lose 40 with Town and Country. a:r:ui.JB 33 Planning Commission Meeting —July 19, 2005 Aanenson: Yeah, I go by page 5. This is the other, the other piece right there. Papke: Okay. Related to that, on page 11 under the conditions. The first condition here, I'm a little confused by what it really means. Any land use changes to residential land use shall be based on another property requesting an industrial land use within the 2005 AUAR. What does that really mean to the developer? Aanenson: They had that same concern. I think the goal there was to see if we could try to replace that. That's always something the City Council wants us to look at, and that goes back to the same question that Commissioner Keefe asked. You know what are we doing to make sure that we're maintaining that and that was my answer, that we noticed another piece in the area. Not necessarily even in this 2005, although we do have a request. Some of that's looking whether or not that deal comes about, we may or may not. Papke: So just to make sure I understand what the intent of this is, I mean the developer has no control over this. So this is really kind of a warning if you will or a caveat to the developer that approval of their application might be contingent on compensating. Aanenson: Right. The council may direct the staff to say you know if you can pick it up somewhere else, then we feel better about losing it. Putting them on notice. Papke: Okay. Then I understand. Thank you. McDonald: Okay. Debbie? Larson: I don't have any. McDonald: Mark. Undestad: Just one more on the industrial. As these are coming in now and we're going residential and again the city's looking for industrial, I think some of the concerns with the people aren't ready to develop their land right now. When it gets to them and say the residence, the city wants industrial land, is that going to be forced on them? Aanenson: Right, well that's always been an issue and because we do have other pieces that sit out there for a while because sometimes you're waiting for the larger, for example Lifetime Fitness. The owner of that development asked several times for the city to split the piece. The city chose not to because we were waiting for that large tenant, and luckily we didn't or we wouldn't have Lifetime. So sometimes we just have to hold for the right tenant and that's, the pressure isn't there to change zonings. We've had that request with the school district about the property for that one to come in and change to multifamily and the council chose not to do that at that time and that's the piece just as I mentioned that's just north of this, kitty comer that the school district just bought. So there's always economic forces to bear. But again we looked at, because we know the road is a blending of those two pieces and the topography, that lent a lot to the decision making that the staff went through. Again going back to how we got to Town and Country's piece, the residents on the Chaska side. You know we looked at both those pieces. 34 Planning Commission Mee —July 19, 2005 • Preserving the trees. The road issue and made the decision to go on that kind of lot fit in. What we've heard from a lot of people, and I know Mr. Fox is here, you know that we've heard a lot of people say they'd rather be on the other side with this, of the corridor had they known that. At the time we put the comp plan together, we weren't even sure 212 was still going to be funded. So we looked at those across the street. How Degler got their piece industrial because all 3 of those corners were then industrial so that kind of was the rationale for some of that. Keefe: One more question. Just tying into, and there's no proposal attached to this in regards to. Aanenson: That's correct. Keefe: It's just merely a zoning change. Why, why do we have just a zoning change without any sort of proposal? Aanenson: That's a good question. Because if you go to the next level, as you saw the plans for Town and Country, there's just thousand of dollars spent in engineering costs so this is really just to get an early read from you. To say does this make some sense and are we going to get no consideration, some consideration. So this is really what it is, kind of put together some ideas and get some direction and that's what that list has all the building comments of staff, engineering, planning that put together in order to say does this make some sense. Is there a rationale basis to even go to the next level? McDonald: Okay. Well I've got a couple of questions for you. Need you to educate me a little bit. We're being asked to approve a zoning for this to be a preliminary planned unit development. We're given some details. But as I understand it, all this does is create a framework for development. What happens here is that the developer is kind of given the dimensions of his box and what he will do is fill it in. If you agree with it, that's what we'll bring to the commission. If not, you all will negotiate and work within to then come up with the inside. Am I? Aanenson: That's correct. McDonald: Am I correct in all that? Aanenson: Yeah, again similar to the Town and Country process, they make, now they know where the road is, might say this is where we want, they may change some of the product type on that and then as a transition and that we probably put that on a work session for you and then kind of get it tighter and then build the plans from there. McDonald: Okay. And then, to kind of go where everyone else's concerns are, if we go with this PUD, are we locked into looking at residential or if the builder comes back and says, no. I want to go industrial, does he have that kind of freedom of by approving this are we locking into a certain type? Aanenson: As stated in our city code, conceptual PUD has no legal standing. Even if you told them, I mean obviously the goal is to give some good faith direction but if the council could 35 Planning Commission Meeg —July 19, 2005 • obviously say something completely different, or they could come back and say you know we really changed our mind. We'd like to see something else. That's, you're allowed to do that too. McDonald: Okay, well I thank you for the education. I have no further questions. Does anyone else? And at that point is there anyone here from Mr. Peterson or representing his side of all this? John Chadwick: My name is John Chadwick. I live at 11430 Zion Circle. Chair, Planning Commission, staff. Thank you for the chance to visit with you this evening. Pretty exciting to be working here in a, what do I say, highly listed community. Really glad to do that one. I continue to support that. I was pretty excited when I saw that. I was going to be brief and then I remember my brother's a pastor so brief is really kind of a relative thing. But Mr. Peterson is here tonight. He's owned the property for 4 decades or been involved in it for even longer than that. Worked on it as a kid when they used to thrash, so if there's any kind of questions you have on the history of it, I think he can provide that to you. There's a great desire to make it a very nice project and to support the notion of a signature project and signature area for the community. And to that end the support of residential, we're asking for that now that there's residential on the west you just approved. There's a beautiful park in the Bluff Creek Overlay District as well as a brand new city park to the north, and it was pointed out residents, residents use parks so rather than put an industrial building that nobody's going to use the park, gee wouldn't it be nice to have people that are right there to use that park that you're going to build or have. And then if you look to the east, it looks like there might be some more residential coming in so to put a little sliver of something other than residential between all of that might not be the very best design to have Peterbuilt mixing with Tonka Toys. We'd like to support a very nice, kind of a little bit higher, high end development if you will overlooking that bluff and a little bit on the creek area, and there's a lot of nice trees down in the valley. So we're looking to preserve all of that rather than not preserve it and want to utilize those beautiful views that are there. And speaking of utilizing, in support of the AUAR, there's definitely a plan to build that east/west. I think Bluff Creek Boulevard. Thank you. In support of that and this would allow utilization of that and of course repayment of the assessment right away, which is, we're trying to support community goals and so we'd be able to do that. And in support of all of that we'd ask your kind consideration and that this can be given where it's located and given the beautiful natural topography that it would be a nice addition to the community and we'd ask your consideration of it. Thank you. McDonald: Okay, any questions from the commission? Keefe: Yeah, I've got one question for you. If you were to receive approval on this, what is the general timeframe that you're looking at for development. John Chadwick: If we were to get approval, we'd like to go as fast as we can. We have an engineer standing by and if they say, so that would really be great and it would really be nice to dove tail with all the efforts of engineering and planning on the AUAR. And that combined with, as I said in other meetings, kind of an army of yellow equipment coming over the ridge with the building of 212/312. Wouldn't it be nice to tie that in and get some real good utilization 36 Planning Commission Meet — July 19, 2005 • and you know let's put our heads together and let those guys all work at once instead of leave and then have to come back. I mean that would be ideal. Keefe: So you're looking more short tern than maybe 10 years out? John Chadwick: Oh lord yes. McDonald: Any other questions? I have no questions at this time either. With that, this is a public meeting so I will throw this open to the floor. Anyone who wishes to address this issue is invited to come up for the lectern and all we ask is that you state your name and address your comments to the commission. Okay. Seeing no one coming up, at this point I will close the public meeting and I will entertain motions from the commission. Oh I'm sorry, I guess I am putting the cart in front of the horse. Okay, yes. Discussion for the commission and we will start with Kurt. Papke: I must say I was pleasantly surprised when I received my packet here to prepare for tonight's meeting. I was very impressed with the quality of the development. The low density. The layout. I've already expressed, and you probably already heard my opinions on the round -a - bouts so I'm hopefully you'll work in that direction. Being a homeowner just about a half mile east of this development and running by this area every Saturday and Sunday morning on my morning job, one area of concern I have is, and Mr. Peterson is probably aware of this having lived in this area, is that Pioneer Trail here makes sort of a natural valley and makes a natural sound reflector, okay. And the sound coming up just from Pioneer Trail today is pretty substantial and of course 212 will certainly add to that. And so one of the things, you know I was a bit surprised to see the single family along the south, southeast corner of the development. It's up on a, the sight lines will be spectacular of course, but with any high place, development will also come a certain amount of susceptibility to sound, so I would hope the developer would be very sensitive to those sorts of issues, be it berms, trees, whatever you wish. I'm certain MnDot will do their utmost with 212, but for Pioneer Trail there'd be no protection from road noise whatsoever, and it's one of the things, unless you live in this area you don't appreciate, it's a very quiet area because of the lack of development right now. I mean you can hear for about a mile in the morning a car coming down Pioneer Trail and so I think sound abatement will be one of the issues that will really contribute to the quality of the development in here, since you're going to be quite close to both of the highways. Other than that I think it's a great development and I look forward to seeing your future plans. McDonald: Thank you. Deborah. Zorn: I agree with Kurt. I think it's a very nice plan and it's a transition from the west and I would support this moving forward. McDonald: Okay. Dan. Keefe: No comments. McDonald: No comments? Debbie. 37 fi 3fF _ Planning Commission Meeting —July 19, 2005 • Larson: Well I'm thrilled to finally see some low density going in because everything I've seen since I became part of the commission has been high density. Not that they're not lovely projects. They are, but I'm thrilled to see it and good luck with it all. McDonald: Okay, Mark. Undestad: I agree. I mean it's time to get it going with the rest of the package out there makes sense. McDonald: Okay. And I guess the only comment I will add is that I look forward to seeing details as you fill in what's going to actually take place there and it should be exciting. We look forward to it. Okay, now with that I will entertain a motion from the commission. Zorn: I motion to, that the commission recommends approving Concept PUD with the following conditions, 1 through 26. McDonald: Okay. Do I have a second? Larson: Second. McDonald: I have a second. Zorn moved, Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Concept PUD with the following conditions: 1. Any land use changes to Residential land use shall be based on another property requesting an Industrial land use with in the 2005 AUAR area. 2. Implementation of the AUAR recommendations. 3. The preliminary plat plans must incorporate the updated alignment of the east -west collector street and the proposed roundabout. 4. Turn lane requirements and the typical street section shown in preliminary plans must be consistent with the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report" recommendations. 5. A preliminary utility plan must be submitted with the preliminary plans and must comply with the trunk sanitary sewer and watermain design shown in the "2005 MUSA Area Expansion Improvements Feasibility Report". 6. A pressure reducing valve is required within the development and must be shown on the preliminary utility plan. s 0 Planning Commission Meeting —July 19, 2005 7. The preliminary utility plan must include lateral storm sewer to service the proposed development. 8. The developer's engineer must work with Town & Country's engineer to minimize the amount and/or height of retaining walls to the maximum extent possible. 9. The attached single-family townhome buildings are required to be protected with an automatic sprinkler system if they are over 8,500 sq. ft. in floor area. For the purposes of this requirement property lines do not constitute separate buildings and the area of basements and garages is included in the floor area threshold. 10. Walls and projections within 3 feet of property lines are required to be of one -hour fire - resistive construction. 11. Each unittlot must be provided with separate utility services. 12. Complete proposed site, grading and utility plans must be submitted to determine more detailed requirements. 13. The City will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication on the Peterson parcel. 14. A report documenting the delineation of jurisdictional wetlands in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual must be submitted to the City. 15. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) must be maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. A wetland buffer 20 to 30 feet in width (with a minimum average of 20 feet) must be maintained around all Natural wetlands. 16. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant must install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and must pay the City $20 per sign. 17. All structures must be set back 40 feet from the edge of the wetland buffer. The wetland buffer setback should be shown on the plans. 18. Any areas on the property that meet the City's criteria for bluffs (i.e., slope greater than or equal to 30% and a rise in slope of at least 25 feet above the toe) must be shown on the plans and preserved. In addition, all structures must maintain a 30-foot setback from the bluff and no grading may occur within the bluff impact zone (i.e., the bluff and land located within 20 feet from the top of a bluff). 19. The primary corridor boundary and the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor are not shown on the plans. The plans should be revised to show the primary corridor and the setback. 39 Planning Commission Meeting —July 19, 2005 • 20. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. All structures must meet the 40-foot setback from the primary corridor. 21. Based on the existing canopy coverage for the site, the developer will need to meet minimum planting requirements. 22. Bufferyard planting will be required along the south and west property lines. 23. Landscaping for the attached housing area should include native species for overstory and foundation plantings as well as non-native, ornamental selections. 24. Large groupings of materials will help extend the natural areas into the developed sites and create privacy for residents. 25. A strong, boulevard tree planting element is recommended within the development and required along any collector roads. 26. The development should establish viewsheds to be preserved as part of the development." All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. (The Planning Commission took a short recess at this point in the meeting.) PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR REZONING OF PROPERTY FROM AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT (A2) TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT BOULEVARD AND GALPIN BOULEVARD, CHANHASSEN WEST BUSINESS PARK, EDEN TRACE CORPORATION, PLANNING CASE NO.05-23. Public Present: Name Address Tom Witek Jim Leonard JoEllen Radermacher LuAnn Sidney Rick Buan Mimi & Nate Espe Cathy & Kevin DiLorenzo Ron Blum Christine & Mark Fischer Peggy Emerson 2318 Stone Circle Drive 2360 Stone Circle Drive 2479 Bridle Creek Trail 2431 Bridle Creek Trail 2569 Stone Creek Lane West 2300 Stone Creek Lane West 2382 Stone Creek Lane West 2081 Stone Creek Drive 2407 Bridle Creek Trail 8409 Stone Creek Court 40 0S-2o CITY OF CHANIIASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Boa 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Fax 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone:952227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone. 952,227.1140 Fax 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227,1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning 6 Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site worw.ci.chanhassennn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director DATE: July 11, 2005 SUBJ: Concept Planned Unit Development for Property Located at 1600 Pioneer Trail Applicant: Sever Peterson — Parks and Trails PARKS The Sever Peterson faun represents one of the properties located within the 2005 MUSA area that is currently being considered for development. The Peterson farm is situated on Bluff Creek and is proposed to be developed into residential housing. The number of units to be built is yet unknown, but initial estimates total 115 homes. The city's Comprehensive Park Plan calls for one acre of usable park space to be set aside for every 75 residents. The Peterson housing development will result in an estimated 300 new residents. In this scenario, the city's Comprehensive Plan would call for a four -acre park to be preserved and developed on this property. However, the Comprehensive Plan also recognizes that building a small park in every single family addition is undesirable and would result in an unmanageable municipal park system. To this end, the plan calls for neighborhood parks to be centrally located within housing regions with a maximum distance of one mile between neighborhood parks. This pooling of resources and land in order to centrally locate parks in specific park service areas results in the efficient use of limited capital and long term maintenance dollars. In the case of the Peterson Farm, the city is planning to service neighborhood park needs at a location directly north and across Bluff Creek from the farm. Therefore, it is anticipated that the city will be seeking park fees in lieu of land dedication on the Peterson parcel. SCANNED The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding Val Is, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Concept Planned Unit Development for Property Located at 1600 Pioneer Trail Sever Peterson — Parks and Trails July 11, 2005 Page 2 TRAE S A variety of pedestrian improvements will be incorporated into the Peterson development. Foremost is a ten -foot wide asphalt trail to be constructed within and paralleling the Bluff Creek Corridor. This important trail will most likely be constructed on the north side of Bluff Creek at this location. Additional pedestrian trails, sidewalks and trail connectors will be incorporated into the project as required. The planning and construction of these pedestrian improvements will, in most cases, be managed as private improvements. G:\Plan\2005 Planning Cases\05-20 Peterson Bluff\park comments.doc City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952)227-1100 Date: June 20, 2005 To: Development Plan Referral Agencies From: Planning Department By: Kate Aanenson AICP, Community Development Director Subject: Concept Planned Unit Development for property located at 1600 Pioneer Trail Applicant: Sever Peterson Planning Case: 05-20 The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department on June 17, 2005. The 60-day review period ends August 16, 2005. In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public (ands or easements for park sites, street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. This application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on July 19, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City lull. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than July 8, 2005. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your cooperation and assistance is greatly appreciated. 1. City Departments: a. City Engineer b. City Attorney c. City Park Director d. Fire Marshal e. Building Official f. Water Resources Coordinator g. Forester 2. Carver Soil & Water Conservation District 3. MN Dept. of Transportation 4. MN Dept, of Natural Resources 5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 6. U.S. Fish & Wildlife 7. Carver County a. Engineer b. Environmental Services 8. Watershed District Engineer a. Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek b. Lower Minnesota River c. Minnehaha Creek 9. Telephone Company (Qwest or SprintfUnited) 10. Electric Company (Xcel Energy or MN Valley) 11. Mediacom 12. CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 13. Other - 14. Other - Carver County GIS Mapping Application + 14� Avg �! ,ACC v b j �V br Lrgcnd FoaO'ea us ngmars a+H 1 MN Map Created on: county awi� ��, 6-20-2005 uWs Carver Pa¢el, County Aerial Plwro 7007 This map was created using Carver County's Geographic Information Systems (GIS), it is a compilation of information and data from various City, County, State, and Federal offices. This map is not a surveyed or legally recorded map and is intended to be used as a reference. Carver County is not responsible for any inaccuracies contained herein. J. EDWIN CHADWICK, LLC 11430 Zion Circk Land and Farms - Bloomington, Minnesota 55437 Office (952) 853-2473 FAX (952) 886-o492 May 31, 2005 Ms. Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Peterson/Jacques Farm Information Letter Concept PUD Application to follow Dear Ms. Aanenson: This information letter is coming forth at this time after two -years of deliberation and extensive work with city staff, MNDOT and the AUAR team. Timing The letting of the Trunk Highway 212 project and the rapid design/build process being undertaken by the contractor makes this a very time sensitive project. Additionally, the AUAR study has been completed over the last couple of years, the feasibility report for infrastructure for the area is in place and there is a natural synergy of timely land planning and construction in concert with the large Highway 212. The City has indicated that there is a desire to undertake the East West Collector Street and bridge project shortly as well. Clearly the time is now. Ownership Background The property is owned by Mr. Sever Peterson and has a long history with the Peterson family. Mr. Peterson, has owned the farm for four decades and been farming it even longer, having worked with the thrashing crew as a boy assisting his father and grandfather. Due to this long attachment to this parcel of land, Mr. Peterson wants to see a style of development which is sensitive to the existing natural features and takes full advantage of the spectacular views on the site. Existing Land Use The site is currently a mix of farming uses and natural open space adjacent to and including parts of the Primary Bluff Creek Overlay Area. The topography has beautiful rolling hills and is one of the highest points in Chanhassen, resulting in spectacular views at many locations on the site. Adjacent Land Use The land to the west of the site is where Town and Country Homes, Inc. has proposed the Liberty Development, which is a neighborhood of approximately 350 mid -density residential townhomes. The land to the north of the Peterson farm is under contract with Pemtom and is intended for housing. The land to the east of the Peterson farm is controlled by Town and Country Homes, Inc. and is intended for residential development. The land to the south is part of the 2015 and 2020 MUSA expansion areas and also includes the soon -to -be -constructed Highway 212. This area is also near one of the possible new CR 41 river crossing corridors, however, the impact of that potential project is questionable at this time due to the uncertainty of its final location and that the project is unfunded and therefore will likely not occur until after 2020, which should be long after full development of the 2005 MUSA has occurred. Access to Infrastructure The East-West Collector will run through the Peterson property in the northwest comer. This project calls for a nice sweeping boulevard and installation of sewer and water and is intended to start in 2005 or early 2006. The second major roadway improvement will be the road labeled in the AUAR as the Southern Connector Road which will nm from the new East-West Collector to Pioneer Trail. Proposed Land Use The proposal is a residential planned unit development (PUD) on approximately 67 acres that is in concert with the residential component that is called forth by the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. The current guidance calls for development of 4-8 units per acre of housing and although the ultimate density is still being worked out in design, we anticipate it will be at the lower end of that density range. This reduced density is due in large part to the constraints of the topography and soils and also due to the desire to preserve and enhance the access to the existing natural resources and views. We want to work with the existing topography and resources rather than over -engineer the site and destroy much of its unique and special character. Issues of density transfer of units that could be built within Bluff Creek Overlay# 1 but must be relocated out of the Primary district will be worked out over time with City Staff. The East-West Collector and Southern Collector roads are proposed to be utilized as buffers between areas of higher and lower densities. Higher densities are proposed on the west side of the site to remain compatible with the adjacent Town and Country Homes, Inc. proposed development and then the density drops off significantly as the topography rises in the east and adjacent to the Bluff Creek Overlay Area. Our engineer did look at the suitability of the topography and soils for non- residential purposes and determined that much of the site was unsuitable for non- residential uses due to topography and soil constraints. That report has been provided to City staff. The Peterson Family would be disappointed if this beautiful site was turned into a sea of parking lots, loading docks and retaining walls. Housine Product Tvnes The land use design would call for three residential product types of varying size and density. The centerpiece of the project is an area of large lot executive home sites which would be overlooking or adjacent to the beautiful Bluff Creek Valley. These homes can be some of the premier homes in the area. There are more 20 acres of the Bluff Creek Park nature area which will preserved as part of this development and these homes will have wonderful views of this amenity as well as a view from the top of Chanhassen. The area west of the Southern Connector Road will be an area of 2-4 unit buildings which will provide a nice transition between Town and Country's offering to the west and the generous single-family homes to east. The area north of the East-West Collector and on the western side of the parcel which would be contiguous with Town and Country will have a higher density townhome product which would be similar to what is being offered by Town and Country in area immediately adjacent to it. This area would likely be physically connected to the Town and Country project through the extension of Town and Country's local street system. If the Town and Country project ends up reducing density adjacent to this area, it could be redesigned for more executive homes due to its proximity to the Bluff Creek Overlay and terrain. We look forward to receiving input from the City regarding this proposal so that we can then move forward with the more detailed design information that will be needed for the City Engineer's final roadway design on the East-West Collector and related infrastructure projects. Sincerely. `/z✓ ' E. Chadwick nclosure Peterson Development Concept A Chanhassen, MN I•SITE DATA PROPOSED RSF ZONING UNIT COUNT: 37 UNITS LAND AREA: A39.8 ACRES (INCLUDES D7ACRES D CREEK PRIMARYOVERLAYDISTRICT) DENSITY: 0,93 UNITS/ACRE LOT RFOUIREMENTR, 15.000 SF MINIMUM LOT SIZE FRONT YARD SETBACK: 30 FEET REAR YARD SETBACK:30 FEET SIDE YARD SETBACK: 10 FEET MINIMUM LOT FRMTAGE:90 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT: THREE (3) S70PIES/FORTY (40) FEET PROPOSED R-4 70NING UNIT COUNT: 36 UNITS LAND AREA; 316.5 ACRES INCLUDES A5.1 ACRES OF BLUFF REEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 2.18 UNITS/ACRE LOT REQUIREMENTS: 15,000 SF MINIMUM LOT SIZE FRONT YARD SETBACK: 30 FEET REAR YARD SETBACK:30 FEET SIDE YARD SETBACK: 10 FEET LOT ) MINIMUM S MAXIMUM HEIGHT. THREE(E 3)ET S/ STORIEFORTYY (40) FEET PROPOSED R-B ZONING UNIT COUNT: 42 UNITS LAND AREA: A14.2 ACRES (INCLUDES A4.9 ACRES OF BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 2.95 UNITS/ACRE LOT REQUIREMENTS: ( FRONT SYARDNISETBACK 25MUM LOT EFEETTOWNHpAES) REAR YARD SETBACK:25 FEET SIDE YARD SETBACK: 10 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT: THREE (3) S70PIES/FORTY 40) FEET MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 150 FEET (TOWNHOM S) OUTLOT N1: A3.13 ACRES OUTLOT /2: 32.33 ACRES (OUTLOTS p1 AND /2 ARE NOT INCLUDED LEGEND L3 IQ THEL ABOVE COMPUTATIONS) ® FLOOD ZONE A WETLAND LIMITS �..� BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT (A29.71 AC.) _.._._ BLUFF CREEK SECONDARY OVERLAY DISTRICT (A49.84 AC.) BLUFF CREEK - BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT 0 NET DEVELOPABLE AREA - FLOOD ZONE A 4 PROPOSED MND07 R.O.W. (PER MN/DOT DEL. 2OD4) EXCLUDING EXISTING PIONEER TRAIL R.O.W. (143.12 AC.) �+" ) EXISTING WETLAND (A0.62 AC.) 7 Date: June 3, 2005 J Peterson Bluff Aerial View j Sit i LL Ca,u pS-oZo KUIISISTO LTD F37. 1959 TO: Kate Aanenson Engineering - Planning - Surveying • Landscape Architecture TRANSMITTAL MOVED Community Development Director City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard / PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 JUN 9 P005 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DATE: June 8, 2005 PROJECT NO.: 2003-731-M RE: Sever Peterson Property WE ARE SENDING YOU: ® Attached ❑ Under Separate Cover Via: US Mail Copies Date No. Description 1 05/26/05 Adjoining Property Owners List/Labels 500-foot radius) THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED: (If enclosures are not as listed, please notify us at once.) ® As requested ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit ® For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit ❑ For review and comment ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return ❑ Prints returned after ❑ For bids due ❑ loan REMARKS: For conceot submittal for Sever Peterson copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints CC: John Chadwick, 11340 Zion Circle, Bloomington, MN 55437 SIGNED: Joe Samuel, PE ® (952) 933-0972 6110 Blue Circle Drive - Suite 100 Minnetonka, MN 55343 FAX (952) 933-1153 ❑ (218) 262-5528 303 East 19th Street • P. O. Box 656 - Hibbing, MN 55746 FAX (218) 262-5059 ❑ (763) 434-7646 1321 Andover Boulevard, Suite 114 Ham lake, MN 55304 FAX (763) 434-8007 WANI l7 (218) 720-6219 4511 West First Street, Suite 3 - Duluth, MN 55807 FAX (218) 720-6267 From: "Brad Rupert' <brupert@co.carver.mn.us> To: <sdonnelly@rlk-kuusisto.com> Date: 5/26/2005 4:37:09 PM Subject: Parcel Buffer Request Attached is a spreadsheet containing a list of all property owners within 500' of the requested parcel. I have also attached the invoice and disclaimer. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Brad Bradley Rupert GIS Specialist, Carver County 600 East 4th St Chaska MN 55318 Phone 952-361-1556 Fax 952-361-1582 www.co.carver.mn.us/website/gishome "The unauthorized disclosure or interception of e-mail is a federal crime. See 18 U.S.C. SEC 2517(4). This e-mail is intended only for the use of those whom it is addressed and may contain information which is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under the law. If you have received this e-mail in error, do not distribute or copy it. Return it immediately to the sender with the attachments, if any, and notify the sender by telephone." Sew F_-+e(-sdn lrip,{ BstILC&Cl5 SCANNED Carver County https://www.co.carver.mn.us/carvercountyre... 5/26/2005 1:08 PM COUNTY WEBSITE I PROPERTY SEARCH I FAQ's I GLOSSARY I ' Pd -1 Parcel Number 25.0262000 PROPERTY SEARCH FREQUENT QUESTIONS Property Address GLOSSARY . 1600 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN COUNTY WEBSITE Identification Information CONTACT CARVER Primary Taxpayer/Owner COUNTY PETERSON-JACQUES FARM LAND CO C/O SEVERIN H PETERSON JR 15900 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347-4047 Legal Description SW1/4 NW1/4 & IN 27-116-23 E1/2 NE1/4 Payable Year: 2006 Section: 26 Township: 116 Range: 023 Tax Roll Type: REAL ESTATE Jurisdiction: CHANHASSEN CITY School District: SCHOOL DISTRICT 0112 Real Estate and Personal Property Taxes are determined using the previous year assessment value. Mobile Home Taxes are determined using the current year assessment value. Property Classification: AGRICULTURAL RES 1 UNIT Assessment Year 2004 Payable Year 2005 Est. Market Value - Building $85,000.00 Total Tax Est. Market Value - Land $5,474,500.00 Special Assessments: Est. Market Value - Total $5,559,500.00 RECYCLE MGT Taxable Market Total $370,300.00 Total Tax/Asmts. Paid To Date Installments Due Date Taxes/Assessments 1st Half 5/16/2005 Taxes/Assessments 2nd Half 11/15/2005 "Additional reductions in taxable value may apply due to special tax deferrals, This Old House, Plat Laws, etc. $4,095.00 $23.00 $4,118.00 $2,059.00 Amount Due PAID $2,059.00 SCANNED IofI CARVER COUNTY GIS DISCLAIMER �oF��x9:xkxk����'c�xkxk�Fk���F9c�x:tixd:xk�7'c���x:F This List was created using Carver County's Geographic Information Systems (GIS), it is a compilation of information and data from various City, County, State, and Federal offices. This List is not a legally recorded document and is intended to be used as a reference. Carver County is not responsible for any inaccuracies contained herein. SCANNED Invoice Shari Donnelly RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd. 6110 Blue Circle Drive Minnetonka 952.933 0972 County of Carver IS/GIS Dept Government Center, Admin Building Chaska, Mn 55318 Suite 10 55343 Invoice No GIS 477 Date 5/26/2005 Make checks payable to: Carver County Treasurer Date Description Amount 5/26/2005 Property Owners within 500' of PID # 250262000 $0.00 11 Records @ 0.08/Record $0.88 .25 hrs @ 70.00/hr $17.50 $0.00 $0.00 TOTALI $18.38 Fund Dept Program Service Ob'ect Amount 01 049 062 1 0000 5528 $18.38. Total $18.38 Paid Submitted by GIS/IS Dept. Brad Rupert (952) 361-1549 Phone NAME NAME1 A001 ADD2 ADD3 CITY STATE ZIP ZIP4 ARTHUR B JOHNSON 17448 FRONDELL CT EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 3416 AURORA INVESTMENTS LLC 5215 EDINA INDUST BLVD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55439 302 BLUFF CREEK GOLF ASSOC 1025 CREEKWOOD DR CHASKA MN 55318 9647 CITY OF CHASKA CIO NOEL GRACZYK 1 CITY HALL PLAZA CHASKA MN 55318 1962 FOX PROPERTIES LP 27990 SMITHTOWN RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 7911 G&M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP 24760 CEDAR POINT RD NEW PRAGUE MN 56071 4056 GAYLE O & LOIS J DEGLER TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 1630 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9402 JOHN KLINGELHUTZ CIO JAMES W HEISEL 350 EAST HWY 212 PO BOX 89 CHASKA MN 55318 89 KLINGELHUT2 CONSTRUCTION CO 350 HWY 212E CHASKA !,CHASKA MN 55318 2144 NDI MINNESOTA LLC CIO HOVSTONE PROPERTIES MN LLC 7615 SMETANA LN SUITE 160 PRAIRIE MN 55346 4700 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 1395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 1631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG 1 161 HAUL MIN 55155 1801 SCANNED ARTHUR B JOHNSON 17448 FRONDELL CT EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-3416 BLUFF CREEK GOLF ASSOC 1025 CREEKWOOD DR CHASKA, MN 55318-9647 FOX PROPERTIES LP 27990 SMITHTOWN RD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-7911 GAYLE O & LOIS J DEGLER TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 1630 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9402 KLINGELHUTZ CONSTRUCTION CO 350 HWY 212 E CHASKA, MN 55318-2144 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG ST PAUL, MN 55155-1801 ICJ AURORA INVESTMENTS LLC 5215 EDINA INDUST BLVD, SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439-3023 CITY OF CHASKA C/O NOEL GRACZYK I CITY HALL PLAZA CHASKA, MN 55318-1962 G&M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP 24760 CEDAR POINT RD NEW PRAGUE, MN 56071-4056 JOHN KLINGELHUTZ C/O JAMES W HEISEL 350 EAST HWY 212 PO BOX 89 CHASKA, MN 55318-89 NDI MINNESOTA LLC C/O HOVSTONE PROPERTIES MN LLC 7615 SMETANA LN, SUITE 160 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 553464700 x P RCAF CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO.05-20 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, July 19, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for Concept Planned Unit Development on property located at 1600 Pioneer Trail — Peterson Bluff. Applicant: J. Edwin Chadwick, LLC. A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director Email: kanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1139 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on July 7, 2005) sCA+No CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Payee: SEVERIN PETERSON JR Date: 06/23/2005 Time: 8:43am Receipt Number: DW / 6259 Clerk: DANIELLE CONCEPT PUD 05-20 ITEM REFERENCE ------------------------------------------- AMOUNT DEVAP CONCEPT PUD 05-20 USE & VARIANCE 750.00 SIGN RENT 75.00 SIGN ESCROW 100.00 --------------- Total: 925.00 Check 8066 925.00 Change: --------------- 0.00 THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYMENT! CITY OF MEMORANDUM CHMSENTO: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55377 FROM: Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Specialist Administration DATE: July 19, 2005 Phone:952227,1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 SUBJ: Peterson Development Concept, Landscaping and Tree Building Inspections Preservation Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 This site's agricultural use over the years has resulted in wooded areas existing Engineering along the edges of fields and in wetter areas. Nearly all the existing woods fall Phone:952227.1160 within the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Corridor. These areas will Fax: 952.227.1170 receive protection and help create an attractive buffer for the development as well Finance as protect Bluff Creek. Phone:952227.1140 Fax: 952 227.1110 Landscaping requirements for the Peterson development include: Part & Recreation 1. Based on the existing canopy coverage for the site, the developer will need Phone: 952.227 1120 to meet minimum planting requirements. Fax: 952.227.1110 2. Bufferyard planting will be required along the south and west property Recreation Center lines. 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 3. Landscaping for the attached housing area should include native species Fax:952.227.1404 for overstory and foundation plantings as well as non-native, ornamental selections. Planning & Natural Resources 4. Large groupings of materials will help extend the natural areas into the Phone: 952.227.1130 developed sites and create privacy for residents. Fax: 952.227.1110 5. A strong, boulevard tree planting element is recommended within the Public worts development and required along any collector roads. 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227,1300 Fax: 952.227,1310 Senior Center G:/plan/js/development review/Peterson concept Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. June 2005 Developable Assumptions Lower Bluff Creek Property Net # units units/acres De ler Dean 4Q.0 n/a De ler Gayle 30.0 240.0 8.0 Dorsey 30.0 240.0 8.0 Fox Jeff 21.06- Fox Family 38.0 304.0 8.0 Town Country #2 30.0 135.0 4.5 Town Country #1 79.0 450.0 J7 Peterson Sever 42.0 120.0 2.9 Park 2Q.0 n/a Laurent C9 17.0 n/a 347.0 1,657.0 6.4 AUAR Assumption 350 1,584 OT- 44 Assumptions 3 properties shown in bold have submitted plans for review the remaining net developable acreage is based on historical development patterns which show approximately 30 % of the land is encumbered with wetlands, bluffs, right of way, ponding, etc) Peterson is requesting low density rather than medium or industrial assuming the remaining properties that have not submitted a plan could develop at 8 units an acre and still remain within the parameters of the AUAR, assuming the council would approve, because the properties are guided low or medium density 1.2-8 units an acre g:plan/ka/2005 MUSA/Net developable l� r V E� Pi CD CD W N O O c.n N 20� �SC'T N yuh� c o(y(ys�4ui �11�Ip V1 4D�<<ON mNm Land Uses based on the 2020 city Comprehensive Plan and the Chanhassen 2005 Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Existing Land Use (-Wsed on assessors code) GROSS ACRES TOTAL 624 ACRES Agriculture Use (row crop or pasture) 442 Acres Agriculture, Residential 174 Acres Residential Estate 9 Acres Other Area Calculations T.H. 212 Ri ht-Of-Way(approximate area) I 125 Acres etlands (Chanhassen Wetland Inventory— .2acres and Bernardi Property delineated — F88acres) 54 Acres Floodwa s (100 year flood lain) 78 Acres Steep Slopes (Chanhassen inventory of 18%r or greater slopes) 19 Acres Bluff Creek Overlay Primary District 200 Acres Net —developable 350 Acres til LAND USE DESIGNATION TOTAL NET DEVELOPABLE ACRES PERCENTAGE OF LAND USE MAXIMUM INTENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MAGNITUDE DATA Medium Density Residential/Low Density Residential 132 38 % 8 du/acre 528-1056 units Medium Density Residential 66 18% 8 du/acre 528 units Office 17 5% 0.35 FAR 270,00 square feet Office/Industrial 70 20% 0.30 FAR 920,500 square feet uff Creek 13% Primary Zone Paz * 6% park and-seheel I 600-strts Net Acres Tota1350 100% IestituEieAal 36 * Any District 112 school has been eliminated from the 2005 MUSA - bWK . P O 1 ever �e � (41-s 0 1 �l,s' Carver County GIS Mapping Application 1 `\ 14 a � Rai trrr Rtr�q f�vi7 ��' �o Raad rm US Kqy qs MN 11,",s Map Created on: CSAH UU* Raads 6-20-2005 Lain Carver Pa,ae�, County Mrial PI 2001 This map was created using Carver County's Geographic Information Systems (GIS), it is a compilation of information and data from various City, County, State, and Federal offices. This map is not a surveyed or legally recorded map and is intended to be used as a reference. Carver County is not responsible for any inaccuracies contained herein. Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 51600 www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY 9 AVERYO 51600 GAYLE O 8 LOIS J DEGLER TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 1630 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9402 PETERSONJACQUES FARM LAND CO C/O SEVERIN H PETERSON JR 15900 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347 -4047 G&M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP 24760 CEDAR POINT RD NEW PRAGUE , MN 56071 -4056 BLUFF CREEK GOLF ASSOC 1025 CREEKWOOD DR CHASKA , MN 55318 -9647 AURORA INVESTMENTS LLC 5215 EDINA INDUST BLVD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS , MN 55439 -3023 NDI MINNESOTA LLC C/O HOVSTONE PROPERTIES MN LLC 7615 SMETANA LN SUITE 160 EDEN PRAIRIE. MN 55346 -47DO ARTHUR BJOHNSON 17448 FRONDELL CT EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347 -3416 CITY OF CHASKA C/O NOEL GRACZYK 1 CITY HALL PLAZA CHASKA . MN 55318 -1962 FOX PROPERTIES LP 27990 SMITHTOWN RD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -7911 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRANSPORTATION BLDG ST PAUL , MN 55155 -1801 KLINGELHUTZ CONSTRUCTION CO 350 HWY 212E CHASKA , MN 55318 -2144 JOHN KLINGELHUTZ C/O JAMES W HEISEL 350 EAST HWY 212 PO BOX 89 CHASKA , MN 55318 -0089 09L5 AII13AV-09-008-L @09LS 4ijege6 ai zasiii3n ® OAM3AV wordJan *NLM A apideA a6e439s I? ;a o6e unocigue uoissaidwl Please Check the Addresses to create Labels for: Blue Box = The parcel(s) the Buffer was created for. Red Boxes = Owner/Address duplication. Li GAYLE O & LOIS J DEGLER TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS 1630 LYMAN BLVD 9�40A2 HASSEN , MN 55317 O AURORA INVESTMENTS LLC 8 15DEDINA INDUST SUITE 100 3EAPOLIS , MN 55439 F FOX PROPERTIES LP 2R79%SMITHTOWN 9CELSIOR , MN 55331 - 11 FARM LAND CO C/O SEVERIN 115900 FLYING CLOUD �7 PRAIRIE, MN 55347 O H F�RON-JSON ROUES DR NDI MINNESOTA LLC C/O HOVSTONE PROPERTIES EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 0 MN LLC 7615 SMETANA LN SUITE 160 -4700 ' Q STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT B Vp HN IRELAND 31 RANSPORTATION ST PAUL , MN 55155 -180 11 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 Vp HN IRELAND 631 GRANSPORTATION ST PAUL MN 55155 -1801 0 G&M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP 2R4D760 CEDAR POINT 1-4056 NEWPRAGUE , MN 56071 O ARTHUR B JOHNSON 17448 FRONDELL CT �D16 PRAIRIE, MN 55347 0 KLING ELHUTZ CONSTRUCTION CO 350 HWY 212 E CHASKA, MN 55318 -2144 O BLUFF CREEK GOLF ASSOC 11025 CREEKWOOD DR CHASKA, MN 55318 -9647 Q CITY OF CHASKA C/O NOEL GRACZYK 1 CITY HALL PLAZA CHASKA, MN 55318 -1962 FEICITY OF CHASKA C/O NOEL G RACZYK 1 GITY HALL PLAZA CHASKA, MN 55318 -1962 RdiJOHN KLINGELHUTZ C/O JAMES W HEISEL 350 EAST HWV 212 PO BOX 89 CHASKA , MN 55318 -0089 Create Labels n .�n 700 1400 Fee, Chanhassen AUAR Peterson Bluff Potential Road Layout >CANNW H- Figure 1 Peterson Bluff Aerial View ram,, SCANNED { �E Peterson Development Concept A Chanhassen, MN MSITE DATA PROPOSED RSF ZONING UNIT COUNT: 37 UNITS LAND AREA: 339.8 ACRES INCLUDES 319.7 ACRES OF BLUFF REEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 0.93 UNITS/ACRE LOT REQUIREMENTS, 15,000 SF MINIMUM LOT SIZE FRONT YARD SETBACK: 30 FEET REAR YARD SETBACK:30 FEET SIDE YARD SETBACK: 10 FEET MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE:90 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT: THREE (3) STORIES/FORTY (40) FEET PROPOSED R-4 ZONING UNIT COUNT; 36 UNITS LAND AREA; 316.5 ACRES INCLUDES 35.1 ACRES OF BLUFF REEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY; 2.18 UNITS/ACRE LOT REQUIREMENTS: 15,ODO SF MINIMUM LOT SIZE FRONT YARD SETBACK: 30 FEET REAR YARD SETSACK:30 FEET SIDE YARD SETBACK: 10 FEET MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE:50 FEET (TWO FAMILY MAXIMUM HEIGHT: THREE (3) STORIES/FORTY 40) FEET PROPOSED R-9 ZONING UNIT COUNT: 42 UNITS LAND AREA: ±14.2 ACRES INCLUDES 34.9 ACRES OF BLUFF REEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 2.95 UNITS/ACRE LOT REQUIREMENTS: ( FRONT YARD SF ISE BACK: 25MUM LOT EFEETWNHOMES) REAR YARD SETBACK:25 FEET SIDE YARD SETBACK: 10 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT: THREE (3) STORIES/FORTY 40) FEET MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 150 FEET (TOWNHOM S) OUTLOT /1: 3343 ACRES OUTLOT M2: 12.33 ACRES (OUTLOTS y1 AND Y2 ARE NOT INCLUDED LEGEND OVERALL PARCEL IN HE ABOVE COMPUTATIONS) ® FLOOD ZONE A WETLAND LIMITS �..� BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT (329.71 AC.) ..._... BLUFF CREEK SECONDARY OVERLAY DISTRICT (349.84 AC.) BLUFF CREEK - BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT Q NET DEVELOPABLE AREA - FLOOD ZONE A PROPOSED MNDOT R,O.W. (PER MN/DOT DEC. 2004) © EXCLUDING EXISTING PIONEER TRAIL R.O.W. (343.12 AC.) �) EXISTING WETLAND (t0.82 AC.) w n Date: June 3, 2005 J SCANNED and Country Homes, Inc. proposed development and then the density drops off significantly as the topography rises in the east and adjacent to the Bluff Creek Overlay Area. Our engineer did look at the suitability of the topography and soils for non- residential purposes and determined that much of the site was unsuitable for non- residential uses due to topography and soil constraints. That report has been provided to City staff. The Peterson Family would be disappointed if this beautiful site was turned into a sea of parking lots, loading docks and retaining walls. Housine Product Tvoes The land use design would call for three residential product types of varying size and density. The centerpiece of the project is an area of large lot executive home sites which would be overlooking or adjacent to the beautiful Bluff Creek Valley. These homes can be some of the premier homes in the area. There are more 20 acres of the Bluff Creek Park nature area which will preserved as part of this development and these homes will have wonderful views of this amenity as well as a view from the top of Chanhassen. The area west of the Southern Connector Road will be an area of 2-4 unit buildings which will provide a nice transition between Town and Country's offering to the west and the generous single-family homes to east. The area north of the East-West Collector and on the western side of the parcel which would be contiguous with Town and Country will have a higher density townhome product which would be similar to what is being offered by Town and Country in area immediately adjacent to it. This area would likely be physically connected to the Town and Country project through the extension of Town and Country's local street system. If the Town and Country project ends up reducing density adjacent to this area, it could be redesigned for more executive homes due to its proximity to the Bluff Creek Overlay and terrain. We look forward to receiving input from the City regarding this proposal so that we can then move forward with the more detailed design information that will be needed for the City Engineer's final roadway design on the East-West Collector and related infrastructure projects. Sincerely t n E. Chadwick nclosure Adjacent Land Use The land to the west of the site is where Town and Country Homes, Inc. has proposed the Liberty Development, which is a neighborhood of approximately 350 mid -density residential townhomes. The land to the north of the Peterson farm is under contract with Pemtom and is intended for housing. The land to the east of the Peterson farm is controlled by Town and Country Homes, Inc. and is intended for residential development. The land to the south is part of the 2015 and 2020 MUSA expansion areas and also includes the soon -to -be -constructed Highway 212. This area is also near one of the possible new CR 41 river crossing corridors, however, the impact of that potential project is questionable at this time due to the uncertainty of its final location and that the project is unfunded and therefore will likely not occur until after 2020, which should be long after full development of the 2005 MUSA has occurred. Access to Infrastructure The East-West Collector will run through the Peterson property in the northwest corner. This project calls for a nice sweeping boulevard and installation of sewer and water and is intended to start in 2005 or early 2006. The second major roadway improvement will be the road labeled in the AUAR as the Southern Connector Road which will run from the new East-West Collector to Pioneer Trail. Proposed Land Use The proposal is a residential planned unit development (PUD) on approximately 67 acres that is in concert with the residential component that is called forth by the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. The current guidance calls for development of 4-8 units per acre of housing and although the ultimate density is still being worked out in design, we anticipate it will be at the lower end of that density range. This reduced density is due in large part to the constraints of the topography and soils and also due to the desire to preserve and enhance the access to the existing natural resources and views. We want to work with the existing topography and resources rather than over -engineer the site and destroy much of its unique and special character. Issues of density transfer of units that could be built within Bluff Creek Overlay##1 but must be relocated out of the Primary district will be worked out over time with City Staff. The East-West Collector and Southern Collector roads are proposed to be utilized as buffers between areas of higher and lower densities. Higher densities are proposed on the west side of the site to remain compatible with the adjacent Town J. EDWIN CHADWICK, LLC 11430zimcircle Land and Fums Bimmingmn, Minn ra 55437 Office (952) 853-2473 FAX (952) 8860492 May 31, 2005 Ms. Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Peterson/Jacques Farm Information Letter Concept PUD Application to follow Dear Ms. Aanenson: This information letter is coming forth at this time after two -years of deliberation and extensive work with city staff, MNDOT and the AUAR team. Timing The letting of the Trunk Highway 212 project and the rapid design/build process being undertaken by the contractor makes this a very time sensitive project. Additionally, the AUAR study has been completed over the last couple of years, the feasibility report for infrastructure for the area is in place and there is a natural synergy of timely land planning and construction in concert with the large Highway 212. The City has indicated that there is a desire to undertake the East West Collector Street and bridge project shortly as well. Clearly the time is now. Ownership Background The property is owned by Mr. Sever Peterson and has a long history with the Peterson family. Mr. Peterson, has owned the farm for four decades and been farming it even longer, having worked with the thrashing crew as a boy assisting his father and grandfather. Due to this long attachment to this parcel of land, Mr. Peterson wants to see a style of development which is sensitive to the existing natural features and takes full advantage of the spectacular views on the site. Existing Land Use The site is currently a mix of farming uses and natural open space adjacent to and including parts of the Primary Bluff Creek Overlay Area. The topography has beautiful rolling hills and is one of the highest points in Chanhassen, resulting in spectacular views at many locations on the site. Staging and timing of the development We believe that this will be a two phase project starting in late 2005 or early 2006. The first phase will start at the East-West Collector and go towards the south. SCANNED Generalized development plan showing areas to be developed or preserved Areas to be preserved are indicated on the attached development drawing. SCANNED Number of dwelling units The concept plan shows 115 dwelling units spread across three different density zones. SCANNED Type, number or square footage or intensities of specific laud uses See "Site Data" on attached Development drawing. SCANNED Height, bulk and square footage of buildings This information is beyond the scope of this submittal and will need to be provided at a later date by the eventual builder/developer. SCANNED Approximate building areas, pedestrian ways, and road locations See attached site drawing. Specific building areas and pedestrian ways would be expected to be clarified when builder is chosen. SCANNED Peterson Bluff Overlooking the beautiful Bluff Creek Nature Area Request for Concept stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) consideration May 31. 2005 Ms. Kate Aanenson City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Peterson/Jacques Farm Information Letter Concept PUD Application to follow Dear Ms. Aanenson This information letter is coming forth at this time after two -years of deliberation and extensive work with city stag MNDOT and the AUAR team. Timing The letting of the Trunk Highway 212 project and the rapid design/build process being undertaken by the contractor makes this a very time sensitive project. Additionally, the AUAR study has been completed over the last couple of years, the feasibility report for infrastructure for the area is in place and there is a natural synergy of timely land planning and construction in concert with the large Highway 212. The City has indicated that there is a desire to undertake the East West Collector Street and bridge project shortly as well. Clearly the time is now. Ownership Background The property is owned by Mr. Sever Peterson and has a long history with the Peterson family. Mr. Peterson, has owned the farm for four decades and been farming it even longer, having worked with the thrashing crew as a boy assisting his father and grandfather. Due to this long attachment to this parcel of land, Mr. Peterson wants to see a style of development which is sensitive to the existing natural features and takes full advantage of the spectacular views on the site. Existing Land Use The site is currently a mix of fanning uses and natural open space adjacent to and including parts of the Primary Bluff Creek Overlay Area. The topography has beautiful rolling hills and is one of the highest points in Chanhassen, resulting in spectacular views at many locations on the site. !CANNED Adiacent Land Use The land to the west of the site is where Town and Country Homes, Inc. has proposed the Liberty Development, which is a neighborhood of approximately 350 mid -density residential townhomes. The land to the north of the Peterson farm is under contract with Pemtom and is intended for housing. The land to the east of the Peterson farm is controlled by Town and Country Homes, Inc. and is intended for residential development. The land to the south is part of the 2015 and 2020 MUSA expansion areas and also includes the soon -to -be -constructed Highway 212. This area is also near one of the possible new CR 41 river crossing corridors, however, the impact of that potential project is questionable at this time due to the uncertainty of its final location and that the project is unfunded and therefore will likely not occur until after 2020, which should be long after full development of the 2005 MUSA has occurred. Access to Infrastructure The East-West Collector will run through the Peterson property in the northwest comer. This project calls for a nice sweeping boulevard and installation of sewer and water and is intended to start in 2005 or early 2006. The second major roadway improvement will be the road labeled in the AUAR as the Southern Connector Road which will run from the new East-West Collector to Pioneer Trail. Proposed Land Use The proposal is a residential planned unit development (PUD) on approximately 67 acres that is in concert with the residential component that is called forth by the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. The current guidance calls for development of 4-8 units per acre of housing and although the ultimate density is still being worked out in design, we anticipate it will be at the lower end of that density range. This reduced density is due in large part to the constraints of the topography and soils and also due to the desire to preserve and enhance the access to the existing natural resources and views. We want to work with the existing topography and resources rather than over -engineer the site and destroy much of its unique and special character. Issues of density transfer of units that could be built within Bluff Creek Overlay#1 but must be relocated out of the Primary district will be worked out over time with City Staff. The East-West Collector and Southern Collector roads are proposed to be utilized. as buffers between areas of higher and lower densities. Higher densities are proposed on the west side of the site to remain compatible with the adjacent Town SCANNED and Country Homes, Inc. proposed development and then the density drops off significantly as the topography rises in the east and adjacent to the Bluff Creek Overlay Area. Our engineer did look at the suitability of the topography and soils for non- residential purposes and determined that much of the site was unsuitable for non- residential uses due to topography and soil constraints. That report has been provided to City staff. The Peterson Family would be disappointed if this beautiful site was turned into a sea of parking lots, loading docks and retaining walls. Housine Product Tvoes The land use design would call for three residential product types of varying size and density. The centerpiece of the project is an area of large lot executive home sites which would be overlooking or adjacent to the beautiful Bluff Creek Valley. These homes can be some of the premier homes in the area. There are more 20 acres of the Bluff Creek Park nature area which will preserved as part of this development and these homes will have wonderful views of this amenity as well as a view from the top of Chanhassen. The area west of the Southern Connector Road will be an area of 24 unit buildings which will provide a nice transition between Town and Country's offering to the west and the generous single-family homes to east. The area north of the East-West Collector and on the western side of the parcel which would be contiguous with Town and Country will have a higher density townhome product which would be similar to what is being offered by Town and Country in area immediately adjacent to it. This areas would likely be physically connected to the Town and Country project through the extension of Town and Country's local street system. If the Town and Country project ends up reducing density adjacent to this area, it could be redesigned for more executive homes due to its proximity to the Bluff Creek Overlay and terrain. We look forward to receiving input from the City regarding this proposal so that we can then move forward with the more detailed design information that will be needed for the City Engineer's final roadway design on the East-West Collector and related infrastructure projects. Sincerely John E. Chadwick SCANNED Application Map of Area (from AUAR) Map of Development F F w I r )r yF KFK 6N' F W o0< 4�W�WW�n W60>\ z g. 1 <U6)� j N� ZWWF6U N� .. Ng' �Oy V1FW V16' Z <06y _ IOp�S IZW56 z< uo umi5-.Z< zj 6 JJ o M 4O 0\ F ReOWW oy"! carc 4 Q¢m¢ 0O )J O�WaZ� a P n N v _U N J 0 N N U 2 0 Q T � p T Z Z W O T ¢C Pd FO 0 O a n� o rS IV Q I x Nil _ 0 WZ Y Y Y W 6 w <0 am =1 zy,Fgy�»>>�o 00 � W OI iiZ 0 0 0 0 2 V 00LU ma d® 0 0 N M r-1 z U �,� _� SCANNED Other ee.,. IIvat)) vet-avre r..: (vae) wt-,tee IM. ,p eaya r C LCl-SUll 1JC V ClU Chanhassen, MN MSITE DATA PROPOSED RSF ZONING UNIT COUNT: 37 UNITS LAND AREA: ±39.8 ACRES INCLUDES ±19.7 ACRES OF BLUFF REEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 0.93 UNITS/ACRE PROPOSED R-4 ZONING UNIT COUNT: 34 UNITS LAND AREA: ±16.5 ACRES INCLUDES t5.1 ACRES OF BLUFF REEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 2.0 UNITS/ACRE PROPOSED R-8 ZONING UNIT COUNT: 48 UNITS LAND AREA: ±15.0 ACRES INCLUDES f4.9 ACRES OF BLUFF REEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 3.2 UNITS/ACRE OUTLOT #1: t3.13 ACRES ! }�l mIl} I OUTLOT #2: t2.33 ACRES ((OUTLOTS y�{1 AND ##2 ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE AB VE COMPU TIONS) Wq0^ C� WA' OVERALL PARCEL Aj ® FLOOD ZONE A WETLAND LIMITS _.._ BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT (t29.71 AC.) ...... BLUFF CREEK SECONDARY OVERLAY DISTRICT (t49.84 AC.) BLUFF CREEK - BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT - FLOOD ZONE A 0 NET DEVELOPABLE AREA PROPOSED MNDOT R.O.W. (PER MN/DOT D © EXCLUDING EXISTING PIONEER TRAIL R.O. . (f43.12 AC `�) EXISTING WETLAND (t0.62 AC.) - EXISTING SLOPES OVER 30% (f0.85 AC.) 0 200 100 SCALE IN - Date: June 3, 2005 a Peterson Deve COMEMEM Chanhassen, MN . lopment MSITE DATA PROPOSED RSF ZONING UNIT COUNT: 37 UNITS LAND AREA: ±39.8 ACRES (INCLUDES ±19.7 ACRES OF BLUFF REEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 0.93 UNITS/ACRE PROPOSED R-4 ZONING UNIT COUNT: 34 UNITS LAND AREA: ±16.5 ACRES (INCLUDES t5.1 ACRES OF BLUFF REEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 2.0 UNITS/ACRE PROPOSED R-8 ZONING UNIT COUNT: 48 UNITS LAND AREA: ±15.0 ACRES (INCLUDES t4.9 ACRES OF BLUFF REEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT) DENSITY: 3.2 UNITS/ACRE OUTLOT #1: t3.13 ACRES OUTLOT #2: t2.33 ACRES OUTLOTS ##1 AND #2 ARE NOT INCLUDED 1 THE AB6VE COMPUTATIONS) LEGEND OVERALL PARCEL ® FLOOD ZONE A WETLAND LIMITS ---- BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT (t29.71 AC.) -••-••- BLUFF CREEK SECONDARY OVERLAY DISTRICT (t49.84 AC.) • BLUFF CREEK 0 BLUFF CREEK PRIMARY OVERLAY DISTRICT FLOOD ZONE A Q NET DEVELOPABLE AREA PROPOSED MNDOT R.O.W. (PER MN/DOT DEC. 2004) © EXCLUDING EXISTING PIONEER TRAIL R.O.W. (f43.12 AC.) EXISTING WETLAND (t0.62 AC.) EXISTING SLOPES OVER 30% (t0.85 AC.) SCALE IN FEET Date: June 3, 2005 . � . | �§ & , R� Pi 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN U17 Administration Phone:952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone:952.227.1180 Fax:952.227,1190 Engineering Phone: 952,227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park A Recreation Phone:952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone:952,227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone:952.227,1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952 227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci chanhassen.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Kate Aanenson AICP, Community Development Director DATE: September 12, 2005 tgtp SUBJ: Update on 2005 Industrial Replacement Attached is a map showing potential industrial sites. The proposed loss of industrial land on the Town & Country and Peterson/D.R. Horton sites would be 60 acres. The potential replacement includes three properties and would exceed the 70 acres. I will discuss the implications of this industrial replacement in further detail at the meeting. g:\plan\ka\city councilt2005 industrial replacement.cim The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a champing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A groat place to live, work, and play. I Potential Industrial Sites --T --4 A lIp S k 1% Uwj A Wetlands Developable Properties (BCCOR) Town & Country 40 Acres Peterson D R Horton 20 Acres PROPERTY TOTAL ACRES IPRIMARY CORRIDOR ACRES WETLAND ACRES J P'S LIINKS INC-JOHN PRZYMUS 14.29 11.8 0.46 FOX PROPERTIES LIP 54.02 120.3 0.62 TIMOTHY A & DAWNE M ERHART 2.90 10.34 0 Subtotal 71.21 ITOWN & COUNTRY 1-40 JPETERSONID R HORTON 1-20 Subtotal -60 +/- 11.21 FOXPROPERTIESLP 34 Acres 4 N 1E M ERHART 3 Acres September, 2005 G. 1Er?glJofeenlPlann;rg%KatelSVvMPkAnah(sis. mxd I CD I I Cd CO- 1 ®� , ' r ®p m o0 1 00 ;�N Ar(n ZxmD00 o c m my m m m m m 5 ZO m 00 K Z O-R N 00 O. C C C C y0 Z Chi! CC(AZp N mnp0 Z C� O O i yOOp mD NJ ;;�ADT C mO O p N Zm <m< Z r ON yr 0 p pm OA3 zC p A0l I O rl A A A m Kµ .. m� n z x x x ;m OOD zi °� Iymm; Am NZ ww Zvup ti NA NUoDADbA 0 a nmNWKc ax.-rozoti NHa-i µZ 0, D D Z D y! ^�00 mAy C<n ��mnvl p vo n A oa c ..mo<�n1NN N z D O< K O -Di mmm Ny \<OUmi n1 l� O pvmmrm �tim D .I ry AA A O A z Z mJ 9Om yA y r� j � ti0 yp Oyr Az ( K A A^ z \ K v A N N 0 69 EO A m v o< m p ; UO 4 p �p D a D ti p .a Z D� y Z Z A timnp0 <x�AO m A ymjD? I ti NAN µO�1 p ('m <o<0 n_ ZmM>' y Mm( w �aNm D($N np my0 AC ti A A O OT m y y m DZ_ N AZ O `WO m m �um'K D sµ .. D OAS V mow uvv�c z 7� m O N mp0 �m c