The URL can be used to link to this page

CAS-32_THE GODDARD SCHOOL (5)�ETAIL W/GL DIST RECEIPT REPORT • Date: 10/11/04 FROM 00/00/0000 TO 10/11/2004 Time: 4:19pm City of Chanhassen Page: 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _-----------------_____------__ Receipt i Drawer Post Date User Name Notes Customer Name Change Receipt Total Stat -------------' _---------------------------""'---- ------------------------_--------__---- 5480 DW 10/06/2004 DANIELLE GIS LIST-GODDARD SCHOOL 04-32 FREDERICK RIESE 0.00 60.00 W Receipt Type: GIS GIS LIST -GODDARD SCHOOL 04-32 Line Amount 60.00 GL Note: GIS LIST GL Number: 101-0000-3613 Bank Code: CHA Amount: 60.00 -------------- Receipt Total 6D.00 Tender Information: Amount Code Description Reference 60.00 R Check 1047 60.00 Total Tendered 0.00 Change 60.00 Receipt Total Cash Drawer DW Subtotal: 60.00 ------------- Grand Total (excl. voids): 60.00 SCANNED 14 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 M1OF (952) 227-1100 To: Fred C. Riese 9154 Sunnyvale Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ship To: Invoice SALESPERSON DATE TERMS KTM 9/23/04 upon receipt 20Property Owners List within 500' of the southeast intersection of West 78'" Street and Great Plains Boulevard -The Goddard School (20 labels) TOTAL DUE Make all checks payable to: City of Chanhassen Please write the following code on your check: Planning Case #04-32. If you have any questions concerning this invoice, call: (952)-227-1107. THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! g:NplanVor \invoice-gis.doc $3.00 1 $60.00 $60.00 SCANNED Public Hearing Notification Area Map (500 feet) The Goddard School City of Chanhassen Planning Case No. 04-32 W 77t Gras View � � ¢' Chan w` (W 78th St) W 78th St Subject S P PJB 8 Property W -W P�KEE CHICAGO 7 th 9th St JaCd ACTION WEST INC DBA RE/MAX ACTION WEST 7811 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 B4DLLC 555 3RD AVE NW HUTCHINSON MN 55350 BROWN PROPERTIES LLC C/O GARY L BROWN 1831 KOEHNEN CIR W EXCELSIOR MN 55331 CHANHASSEN REALTY CO C/O THIES & THALLE MGMT - PAM PO BOX 250 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 DEAN M AKINS PO BOX 390195 EDINA MN 55439 BAM PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC 440 79TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 AMOCO AMERICAN OIL CO C/O BP AMERICA INC -TAX DEPT PO BOX 1548 WARRENVILLE IL 60555 BLOOMBERG COMPANIES INC PO BOX 730 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MEDICAL ARTS II LLC CHANHASSEN MEDICAL ARTS LP PO BOX 250 C/O THIES & TALLE ENTERPRISES CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PO BOX 250 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHAPEL HILL ACADEMY 306 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 COLONIAL SQUARE LLC PAUL G EIDEM & C/O THIES & TALLE-ATTN K TALLE ANDREA F GRIFFITH 470 78TH ST W 7727 FRONTIER TRL SUITE 260 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HERITAGE PARK APARTMENTS C/O THIES & TALLE MGMT INC 470 78TH ST W PO BOX 250 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HOLIDAY STATION STORES INC ATTN: TAX DEPT #199 PO BOX 1224 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55440 HEATHER P THOMPSON & MICHAEL J SORENSEN MICHAEL E 58TH O LAURA ANN R FRIDGEN MAYER T 55360 7720 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHURCH OF ST HUBERT 8201 MAIN ST CHANHASSEN MN 55317 G L B PROPERTIES LLC 1831 KOEHNEN CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 JAMES M & PATRICIA D MARTIN 3740 UNION TERRACE LN PLYMOUTH MN 55441 WETAIL W/GL DIST RECEIPT REPORT FROM 00/00/0000 TO 11/19/2004 City of Chanhassen ------ __ ------------------------------------------------------------------ Receipt i Drawer Post Date User Name Notes Customer Name ----------------------------------------------------------------' ------- 5340 EE 09/08/2004 B= SITE PLAN APPLICATION GODDARD SCR FRED RIESE Date: 11/19/04 Time: 8:14am Page: 1 ------------------------------ Change Receipt Total Stat ------------------------------ 0.00 1,030.00 W Receipt Type: DEVAP : GODDARD SCHOOL Line Amount 1,030.00 GL Note: SITE PLAN GL Number: 101-0000-3602 Bank Code: CHA Amount: 1,030.00 -------------- Receipt Total 1,030.00 Tender Information: Amount Code Description Reference 1,030,00 R Check 1041 1,030.00 Total Tendered 0.00 Change ------------ 1,030.00 Receipt Total ------------------------------ --------------------------- Cash Drawer RE Subtotal: Grand Total (excl. voids): 1,030.00 1,030.00 6`} 3.;L, Minnesota Department of Human Services March 7, 2005 QUIVUrr MAR 1 1 2005 Zoning Administrator CITY OF CHFiA HASSEIv City of Chanhassen P O Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317-0147 Re: Zoning Notification of Application for Department of Human Services Program License This is to inform you that the Department of Human Services, Division of Licensing has an application for a program to be licensed under Minnesota Rules, parts 9503.0005 to 9503.0170 from The Goddard School, 7805 Great Plains Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 to provide day care for 134 children. Issuance of this license is subject to compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 245A. If you do not contact the Division of Licensing within 30 days of receipt of this letter, we will consider this facility to be in compliance with your local zoning code. If you have questions regarding the facility or its location, please contact Valaire Riese (contact person) at (952) 233-1633. If you have any questions regarding this letter, contact Judy L. Brekke at (651)297-4117 or fax information to (651 IN 297-1490. Sincerely,, T2 �j Peggy Cunningham, Unit Manager Division of Licensing 444 Lafayette Road North • Saint Pauli Minnesota • 55155 • An Equal Opportunity Employer September 30, 2004 Ms. Sharmeen AI-Jaff, Senior Planner Planning Department City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PC Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Dear Ms. AI-Jaff, Please accept this correspondence and the information contained within as our effort to demonstrate what defines The Goddard School as a private educational facility: • The Goddard School for Early Childhood Development is a quality early learning environment that meets the physical, cognitive, social and emotional needs of children aged 6 weeks through 6 years. • Our programs are licensed by the State of Minnesota. • In addition to meeting Minnesota requirements, The Goddard School requires that Lead Teachers be (1) degreed in Early Childhood Education or equivalent field, (2) a nationally certified Child Development Associate (CDA), OR (3) actively pursuing a degree and have previous experience. Class sizes and ratios of students to teachers are in keeping within all iicensing requirements. • Goddard University is available free of charge to any School employee and provides continuing education credits and up to 60 of the 120 hours required for the CDA. • Our curriculum is designed to provide activities that specifically meet and exceed the guidelines in the Early Childhood Learning Continuum Indicators created by the Partnership for Educational Excellence Network. • Learning activities in Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening and Mathematics are formulated to create active and excited learners who go to elementary school prepared to succeed. 1016 West Ninth Avenue, King of Prussia, PA 19406 • Phone: (610)-265.8510 • Fax: 610-265-8867 • unm.goddmdsysterns.com Member, International Franchise Association City of Chanhassen Page 2 September 30, 2004 • Developmentally appropriate activities that lay the groundwork for these Indicators are presented to Infants and Toddlers in environments rich in stimulating materials. Planned activities take place in child centered groupings that facilitate learning through play. • Parents have continual contact with teachers and receive a daily report detailing the day's activities and achievements. Parent/Teacher conferences are held twice during the school year keeping parents informed on their child's abilities and progress toward academic success. • The Goddard School is open weekdays throughout the year from 7:00am to 6:00pm daily, closing only on major holidays. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance, (610) 265-8510. Sincerely, u4p 11 12i Michael Capp Manager, Curriculum and Compliance /Enclosure CC: Justin Miller Kate Aanenson Tim Stoltman, Esq. Fred and Valaire Riese Administration Re: Historical Designation of City Owned Land Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections September 28, 2004 Phone: 952.227.1180 Wachovia SBA Lending, Inc. CITY O� Wachovia Commercial Mortgage, Inc. Attn: Lana Graber IMSESEN 1620 E. Roseville Parkway Suite 100 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Roseville, CA 95661 Chanhassen, MN 55317 historical designation and the proposed development will not be required to be Administration Re: Historical Designation of City Owned Land Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Dear Lana: Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952227.1190 This letter serves as notice that the land Fred and Valaire Riese intend to purchase Engineering from the City of Chanhassen Economic Development Authority has no official Phone: 952 227.1160 historical designation and the proposed development will not be required to be Fax: 952.227.1170 reviewed by any historical agency. Finance Phone: 952227.1140 If you have any questions or need further information, please feel free to contact Fax 952227 1110 me. Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax 9552.227.1110 Recrea0on Center Sincerely, 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning 8 stin Millet jg Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Assistant to the City Manager Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works cc: Fred and Valaire Riese 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1 125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web She wwwachanhassen.mn.us The City of Chanhassen • A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Wachovia Small Business Capital Comprehensive Environmental Survey Applicant: Address or location of property: The purpose of this questionnaire is to provide information about the past and present ownership and uses of the real property upon which lender will rely for security in deciding whether to extend credit. Please respond fully to all questions, including attaching supporting documentary evidence where appropriate. If questionnaire is not completely filled out, or questions are left unanswered, a Phase I may be required. If space is inadequate to answer, please attach additional pages as needed. If applicant conducts business at multiple locations, a separate disclosure statement should be supplied for each location. 1. History of property Ia. The present and previous owner(s)/occupant(s) (if different than owner), the time period of each owner or occupant of the property (start with present and include a twenty-year history if possible), and use of property: Owner Period Occupant (if different) Use of Property A. B. C. D. E. F. I b. Were any of the uses of property a disposal facility, a dumpsite, storage for, or involving use of, chemicals, hazardous waste or toxic materials? (Includes, but not limited to, gasoline station, motor repair facility, commercial printing facility, dry cleaners, junkyard, etc.)? Yes/No (circle one) If yes, please identify and explain. p'• R, e s e i 11e G�ops��zfl �.�1. For Small Business Financing Call 800/722-3o66 Proposed Use of Property? 2. Date of last transfer of ownership: A. Was a pre-acquisition site assessment or environmental survey performed? Yes/No (circle one) If yes, include a copy of the report. 3. Describe present and previous use(s) of the adjacent (bordering) properties. Location Present Use Prior Use (indicate dates) A. North B. South C. East D. West 3. Were any of the uses of adjacent property a disposal facility, a dumpsite, storage for, or involving use of, chemicals, hazardous waste or toxic materials? (Includes, but not limited to, gasoline station, motor repair facility, commercial printing facility, dry cleaners, junkyard, etc.) Yes/No (circle one) If yes, please identify and explain. 4a. Are there currently any damaged or discarded automotive or industrial batteries, pesticides, paints, or other chemicals in individual containers >5 gal (19 L) in volume or 50 gal (190 L) in the aggregate, stored on or used at the property or at the facility? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No 4b. Did you observe evidence or do you have any prior knowledge that there have been previously any damaged or discarded automotive or industrial batteries, pesticides, paints, or other chemicals in individual containers >5 gal (19 L) in volume or 50 gal (190 L) in the aggregate, stored on or used at the property or at the facility? y ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No l� v E 5a. Are there currently any industrial drums (typically 55 gal Z (208L)) or sacks of chemicals located on the property or at the U facility? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No 5b. Did you observe evidence or do you have any prior knowledge that there have been any industrial drums (typically 55 gal (208L)) or sacks of chemicals located on the property or at the facility? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No 6. Did you observe evidence or do you have any prior knowledge that fill dirt has been brought onto the property that originated from: a. a contaminated site? b. an unknown origin? V❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No C CL 7a. Are there currently any pits, ponds, or lagoons located on the L property in connection with waste treatment or waste disposal? y ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No CL 7b. Did you observe evidence or do you have any prior knowledge - that there have been previously any pits, ponds, or lagoons G located on the property in connection with waste treatment or waste disposal? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No H 8a. Is there currently any stained soil on the property? io ❑ See Explanation C C Q. Yes No Yes No p8b. Did you observe evidence or do you have any prior knowledge (AA that there has been previously, any stained soil on the property? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No Iff 13 9a. Are there currently any registered or unregistered storage tanks (above or underground) located on the property? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No Y9b. Did you observe evidence or do you have any prior knowledge that there have been previously, any registered or unregistered I storage tanks (above or underground) located on the property? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No 10a. Are there currently any vent pipes, fill pipes, or access ways indicating a fill pipe protruding from the ground on the property or adjacent to any structure located on the property? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No 1 Ob. Did you observe evidence or do you have any prior knowledge Q, that there have been previously, any vent pipes, fill pipes, or CL access ways indicating a fill pipe protruding from the ground on the property or adjacent to any structure located on the property? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No Ila. Are there currently any flooring, drains, or walls located within the facility that are stained by substances other than water or are emitting foul odors? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No C11 b. Did you observe evidence or do you have any prior knowledge that there have been previously, any flooring, drains, or walls located within the facility that are stained by substances other than water or are emitting foul odors? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No 12. If the property is served by a private well or non-public water by ownert occupant only by lender only system, is there evidence or do you have prior knowledge: a. that contaminants have been identified in the well or ` system that exceed guidelines applicable to the water 4; system? 13 See Explanation Yes No Yes No b. that the well has been designated as contaminated by any government environmental/health agency? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No 13. Does the owner or occupant of the property have any knowledge of complaints, citations, environmental liens or governmental notification relating to past or recurrent y violations of environmental laws with respect to the property d U or any facility located on the property? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No M N 14. Has the owner or occupant of the property been informed of H the: a. past existence of hazardous substances or petroleum products with respect to the property or any facility located 'Q on the property? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No Mb. current existence of hazardous substances or petroleum = products with respect to the property or any facility located on the property? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No 15. Has the owner or occupant of the property been informed of the: a. past existence of environmental violations with respect to y the property or any facility located on the property? C D ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No b. current existence of environmental violations with respect to the property or any facility located on the property? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No l� C 16. Does the owner of occupant of the property have any W knowledge of any environmental site asssessment of the property or facility that indicated the presence of hazardous 0 substances or petroleum products on, or contamination of, the property or recommended further assessment of the property? _ ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No W Explanation: attach additional sheets if necessary This document may be signed in counterparts. The information contained herein is intended for the use of the lender only, and should not be relied on by the borrower or any other party to the transaction. Signatures: I have reviewed my responses above and hereby attest that they are true and correct. Owner/Occupant Date I have visited the site and my responses are true and correcct based on my observations during said visit. Lender/Lender Representative Date I have reviewed the above responses and I hereby attest that I have no additional knowledge which is contrary to this information. Reviewed by Borrower Date 17. Does the owner or occupant of the property know of any past, threatened, or pending lawsuits or administrative proceedings concerning a release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or petroleum products involving the property by any owner or occupant of the property? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No C18a. Does the property discharge waste water, on or adjacent to the O property, other than storm water, into a storm water sewer to system? O ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No I8b. Does the property discharge waste water, on or adjacent to the property, other than storm water, into a sanitary sewer system? W 13 See Explanation Yes No Yes No C19. Did you observe evidence or do you have any prior knowledge ` that any hazardous substances or petroleum products, unidentified waste materials, tires, automotive or industrial C batteries, or any other waste materials have been dumped ' above grade, buried and/or burned on the property? ❑ See Explanation Yes No Yes No 20. Is there a transformer, capacitor, or any hydraulic equipment for which there are any records indicating the presence of PCBs? Yes No Yes No ❑ See Explanation Explanation: attach additional sheets if necessary This document may be signed in counterparts. The information contained herein is intended for the use of the lender only, and should not be relied on by the borrower or any other party to the transaction. Signatures: I have reviewed my responses above and hereby attest that they are true and correct. Owner/Occupant Date I have visited the site and my responses are true and correcct based on my observations during said visit. Lender/Lender Representative Date I have reviewed the above responses and I hereby attest that I have no additional knowledge which is contrary to this information. Reviewed by Borrower Date 1 GARY DEAN Assom s A P�Coa xrm,. P.O. BOX 637 142OLnmCKROAD OLDWKK NE9JExSY 08&%-M7 90&4399111 906.439.9117FA sn4ma pry@plydeao.wm Ta cENGPIPRRClc PAR GS My HlG AYDmi" DOT Aa Pexnm9 MMWc CONstn. G SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC & PARKING CHARACTERISTICS THE FOR EARLY DEVELOPMENT PREPARED FOR: GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC. NOVEMBER 13, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Paee No. INTRODUCTION 2 Data Collection 3 Parking Accumulation Data 4 ANALYSIS OF DATA 5 Summary of Findings - Traffic 5 Summary of Findings - Parking 5 Parking Duration 7 Comparison with ITE Data 7 RECOMMENDED TRIP GENERATION AND PARKING STANDARDS 11 Trip Generation Rates Parking Supply TECHNICAL APPENDIX LIST OF TABULATIONS Table No. Title Page No. I Data Collection for Goddard Schools 4 II Summary of Trip Generation and Parking 6 III On -Site Parking Duration 7 IV Trip Generation Rates — The Goddard School 9 V Recommended Trip Generation Rates per Student 11 Goddard Systems, Inc. provides a specialized child -learning environment within a classroom setting known as the Goddard School. As part of the oversight of both the franchise operation as well as development approvals, Goddard Systems, Inc. has requested an evaluation of typical traffic and parking characteristics of existing schools in an effort to establish uniform design standards for a prototype Goddard School of approximately 8,000+/- square feet. Traffic volume and parking data was collected at three established Goddard Schools located in the suburban New Jersey communities of Howell, Hazlet and Tom's River. Based on this data, the following findings and recommendations are made for the future site planning of new Goddard Schools: RECOMMENDED TRIP GENERATION RATES PER STUDENT THE GODDARD SCHOOL AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Enter Exit Enter Exit 0.47 0.41 0.32 0.37 3.61 Parking Supply Based on the maximum parking demands observed at the three schools studied and to provide an adequate parking supply while minimizing excessive impervious coverage, the recommended parking for a typical 8,000 S.F. Goddard School is 30 to 35 spaces. 11' Gary Dean Associates, P.C. (GDA) has been commissioned to evaluate typical traffic and parking characteristics of various Goddard Schools in established locations to specifically identify the unique operational characteristics that distinguish the Goddard School from other child learning centers. This summary of findings has been prepared to identify maximum parking demands and trip generation data of a typical Goddard School. The parking and traffic rates compiled in this summary have been further compared to those published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers to further assist Goddard Systems, Inc. in seeking various planning and zoning approvals for new locations. This research data has been further compared with in house data collected by GDA for other child care operators, including KinderCare to compare the overall traffic and parking characteristics with the Goddard School. Through consultation with Goddard System, Inc., three specific sites were identified in New Jersey that represent typical, mature operations in established communities. These sites include Goddard Schools in: • Hazlet Township, Monmouth County — 560 Holmdel Road • Howell Township, Monmouth County — 65 Kent Road • Tom's River (Dover Township), Ocean County — 36 Bey Lea Road At each of the above -noted locations, the fixed site and operational characteristics were first identified. In particular, the exact building square footage was determined through a review of the approved site plans, and the existing number of total parking spaces was field measured. From an operational perspective, each school operator was consulted to identify the following operational elements: • Total student enrollment • Total number of students present on the days surveyed • Employee count The purpose of identifying each of these variables, it to provide consistency with the methods outlined by the Institute of Transportation Engineers when conducting local traffic studies. Most often, three time periods are of focus in a traffic study and/or considered by the New Jersey Department of Transportation for highway access permits. These time periods include: 112 • Morning peak hour • Evening peak hour • Total daily traffic Once the total number of vehicles is determined for various critical time periods, a trip generation ratio and parking standard for an "independent" variable can be determined. Because the building size or student enrollment varies from site to site, the ITE typically presents trip generation rates for independent factors (variables) that often change with each new location. For a school, the trip generation is usually expressed in terms of a traffic ratio, per: • 1,000 square feet of building area • Employee • Student For this particular study conducted for Goddard Systems, Inc., a further refinement was made of the traffic and parking ratios based on the total student enrollment as well as the actual student attendance on the days surveyed. This information was used to further "calibrate" the observed traffic data based on a "worst-case" assumption of 100% student enrollment (excluding half day students). In determining the various traffic generation and parking characteristics, essentially the fixed site variables represent the denominator in the analytical equation. Data Collection Once the independent variables were determined at each site location, on-site traffic counts were made that separated the entry and exiting movements and also provided a "snap shot" of the site parking demand at specific intervals. The traffic data collected at each site in essence represents the numerator of the ratio equation that then can be correlated to a trip generation rate per independent variable based on each site's specific physical and operational characteristics. Traffic data was collected at each location in 10 -minute increments on a continuous basis beginning at 7:00 a.m. and concluding at 6:00 p.m. The collected data provides a single site sample believed to be representative of typical traffic conditions in the area and for the specific school location. Data was collected on typical weekdays excluding Mondays and Fridays and was conducted on days when local schools were in session, outside the influence of religious, state, or government or religious holidays. 113 The following data was collected at each of the three locations surveyed and Table I below summarizes the school location and date of the traffic and parking counts: • Entering and exiting traffic movements, tabulated in 10 minute intervals, • Number of occupied parking spaces also tabulated in 10 minute intervals, • Duration of each vehicle parked on site, • The number of children picked up and/or dropped off. TABLE DATA COLLECTION FOR GODDARD SCHOOLS Site Location Date of Counts 7:00 a.m. — 1:00 p.m. 1:00 p.m. — 6:00 p.m. Howell March 26, 2003 March 25, 2003 Hazlet April 1, 2003 April 3, 2003 Tom's River April 2, 2003 April 9, 2003 Parking Accumulation Data Simultaneous with the conduct of the traffic counts, the precise time was noted of each vehicle that entered the site and parked. As the parent or care provider left the building and exited the property, the precise departure time was logged. Based on the time differential between the arrival and departure time, the on-site duration of each parked vehicle was calculated. Supplemental to that analysis, every 10 minutes when the traffic counts were summed, an observation was made of the exact number of vehicles parked on-site. Thus, the peak parking demand could be determined for each site based on the maximum number of observed vehicles. 11 a Summary of Findings — Traffic Following the data collection at each location, the number of vehicles entering and exiting the site was tabulated in 10 -minute intervals, as was the number of parked vehicles. Included in the Technical Appendix to this report are spreadsheet summaries of each location with the time interval of each observation and vehicle counts. Prior to determining the actual trip generation and parking rates for each site, the traffic distribution was presented in graphical form to identify the trends in entering and exiting site activity. Tables 1, 2 and 3 in the Technical Appendix depict the total entering and exiting traffic distributed throughout the course of the survey period and Figures 1, 2 and 3 correspond to each of the Tables and graphically illustrate the traffic trends observed over the course of the school day at each location. As evidenced from the data, the trends are generally consistent with the morning peak traffic distributed over an approximate two-hour period with the highest concentration limited to a 30 -minute interval. There is also a mid-day peak concentrated around 12:30 and finally a lesser peak during the afternoon pick-up hours between 5:00 and 6:00 p.m. One exception was noted at the Hazlet school which shows significantly higher traffic activity during the evening peak hour, that actually exceeds the trends observed during the morning peak. The Howell and Tom's River schools show similar findings with a more consistent pattern of arrivals and departures during the afternoon hours. Summary of Findings — Parking Similar to the trends observed for traffic fluctuations, Figures 4, 5 and 6 in the Technical Appendix show the parking trends throughout the day. In general, the parking patterns also match the overall traffic trends at each location in terms of total activity, however there are some unique differences at each site. Specifically, at the Howell site, during the morning and mid-day peak hours, the parking trends are virtually identical to the traffic trends. A difference however is noted during the afternoon "pick up" hours where the parking activity remained fairly consistent although the traffic activity experienced a slight increase. Presumably this trend is due to various staff members leaving the site, which increases 1= traffic activity, however creates parking vacancies that are subsequently occupied by parents. Thus the overall parking demands remain consistent even though the traffic activity increases slightly. At the Tom's River site, the traffic activity and parking trends are virtually identical. Again for the reasons identified for the Howell Township location, during afternoon school dismissal hours, the parking demands actually decreased even though the traffic activity slightly increased. Presumably due to departing staff members, the subsequent vacating of parking spaces was used by arriving parents. At the Hazlet location, a significantly different trend was noted during the mid-day hours when significantly greater parking demand was created compared to the morning drop off or afternoon pick- up times. As noted from the traffic activity, the mid-day volumes were lower than observed during either morning or afternoon hours. However the parking demand was slightly greater even though traffic activity was less. During these times, parents were waiting longer to pick-up their children, resulting in greater parking occupancy. In all cases, the maximum parking demand ever observed during any time period was 35 spaces, which occurred at the Howell Township location for an approximate 20 -minute duration between 8:20 and 8:40 a.m. At all other times at the Howell site and at the other two school locations, the peak parking demand was less than 35 vehicles at all times. Table II summarizes the traffic generation and peak parking trends observed at each location for the various peak hours along with a tabulation of the total daily traffic. ['� TABLE H .ltFMMARv nF TRTP GY.NF.RATTTTN AND PARKING Site Enter Exit Maximum Parking Demand Enter Exit Maximum Parking Demand Enter Exit I Maximum Parking Demand Enter Exit Hazlet A.M. (7:40 - 8:40 a.m.) Mid -Day (12:10-1:10 p.m.) P.M. (5:00 - 6:00 p.m.) Daily Traffic 56 46 1 21 19 1 27 1 26 55 68 22 244 253 Tom's A.M. (8:10 - 9:10 a.m.) Mid -Day (12:20-1:20 p.m.) P.M. (4:10 - 5:10 p.m.) Daily Traffic River 62 1 56 1 32 16 1 20 1 23 35 37 17 210 215 Howell. A.M. (7:50 - 8:50 a.m.) Mid -Day (12:10-1:10 p.m.) P.M. (5:00 - 6:00 p.m.) Daily Traffic 69 60 35 32 28 30 41 45 19 276 264 Average 62 54 29 22 1 25 26 44 50 19 243 1 244 The data presented in Table II will serve as the basis to determine the trip generation rate for the various independent variables. 11 6 Parking Duration As mentioned, the onsite duration of each parked vehicle was noted at each site location limited to parents or care providers dropping off or picking up children (i.e. employee parking was excluded). The specific times of focus were the morning peak period between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., and the afternoon period between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. The time each vehicle spent occupying a parking space was noted, with the total number of parked vehicles observed, providing an average rate of parking occupancy. Table III summarizes the parking duration observed at each location, along with an average of all three sites combined. TABLE III ON-SITE PARKING DURATION Site A.M. Peak PM Peak (7:00 - 9:00 a.m.) (4:00 — 6:00 p.m.) Howell 9:18 8:49 Hazlet 9:07 10:05 Tom's River 11:07 9:35 Average 9:45 9:32 As noted, the trends are generally consistent with on-site parking durations ranging between approximately 9 and 11 minutes. Averaged over the course of an hour, each parking space has the ability to "turnover" five to six times in 60 minutes. To determine the average parking duration, the total time for all three sites was steed and divided by the total number of vehicles, rather than simply averaging each of the three sites. As noted, when considering all of the vehicles observed during both morning and afternoon peak hours, the findings are virtually identical during both the morning and afternoon peak periods. The average trends show on-site duration of between 9 minutes 30 seconds and 9 minutes 45 seconds. Comparison with ITE Data Within the context of a typical Traffic Impact analysis prepared for a land development application, traffic generation data as compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) is most often 11' used. The ITE has published their efforts in Trip Generation, 6's Edition that presents a summary of actual traffic studies completed at existing operation. However, the ITE does not have data that specifically relates to the unique operations of the Goddard School. Specifically, the ITE has compiled trip generation data for "day-care" centers as well as private elementary schools ranging from kindergarten through Grade 12. As the Goddard School provides a learning environment for children six weeks old to six years old, it is neither a traditional day-care center, nor is it an elementary school. Consequently the application of ITE data is not appropriate for the particular operations associated with a typical Goddard School. Whenever possible, the ITE recommends that traffic data be obtained at local sites that are similar (if not identical) to a specific development proposal. By studying the traffic and parking characteristics of better -defined examples, a truer forecast of future traffic operations can be modeled. For this analysis, the data collected at each site was analyzed for the various peak hours and daily operations and reduced to a traffic rate per an independent variable. Consistent with ITE measurements, the traffic rate of each Goddard School site was calculated on the basis of the actual measured traffic to the building size, number of total students enrolled and staffing levels. Table IV on the following page summarizes the trip generation rates as calculated from the independent variables of each site (Table I) as a ratio of the actual peak hour and daily traffic counts (from Table III). Also shown for comparison are the trip generation rates as customarily derived from the ITE Trio Generation manual for "day-care" centers and for private elementary schools. As shown on Table IV, the use of ITE Trip Generation data based on building size for either a day-care center or a private school does not accurately reflect the patterns evidenced at The Goddard School. Depending on the peak hour studied, the ITE data is lower in the morning peak hour and higher during the evening peak hour. The ITE daily rates are nearly 25% higher than actually measured. However, for the student enrollment, a closer correlation is seen for both the day-care center and a private school compared to The Goddard School. In all cases however, the Goddard School exhibits lower evening peak hour traffic generation than would be estimated using the ITE rates. 118 TABLE IV TRIP GENERATION RATES THE GODDARD SCHOOL Location Per 1000 SF Building Area Per Total Student Enrollment Per Employee AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Enter FExit Enter FExit Enter Exit Enter I Exit Enter I Exit Enter Exit Hazlet 7.66 6.29 7.52 9.30 67.95 0.40 0.33 0.40 0.49 3.58 2.44 2.00 2.39 2.96 21.61 Howell 8.98 7.81 5.34 5.86 70.30 0.48 0.41 0.28 0.31 3.72 2.30 2.00 1.37 1.50 18.00 Tom's River 7.88 7.12 4.45 4.70 1 54.01 0.52 0.47 0.29 0.30 1 3.54 2.70 2.43 1 1.40 1.48 18.47 Goddard School Average 8.17 7.07 5.77 6.62 64.09 0.47 0.40 0.32 0.37 3.61 2.48 2.14 1.72 1.98 19.36 ITE Data (Day -Care Center) 7.16 6.35 6.55 7.39 79.26 0.43 0.39 0.40 0.46 4.52 2.82 2.40 2.53 2.86 31.19 ITE Data (Private School 2.23 1.31 1.54 3.96 NIA' 0.55 1 0.37 0.29 0.35 NIA' 3.40 2.00 1.34 2.29 1 NIA` . Note: ITE Data not Available 119 The trip generation rate per employee is slightly lower for The Goddard School than the ITE rates. It would therefore appear that the best means by which to project future traffic generation potential would be based on the projected student enrollment. Logically, this variable is a better indicator of traffic potential as students are picked -up and dropped -off by the care providers. Thus, the greater the student body size so would be the traffic projections. Trip Generation Rates Based on these findings, the following trip generation rates per projected student enrollment should be used to forecast the future traffic potential for a new Goddard School location. These rates should also be used when applying for Highway Access or Occupancy Permits to state or county agencies with review jurisdiction over proposed site driveways. TABLE V RECOMMENDED TRIP GENERATION RATES PER STUDENT THF: GODDARD SCHOOL AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Enter Exit Enter Exit 0.47 0.41 0.32 0.37 3.61 Parking Supply For parking, although a slight variation exists for each research location, a maximum demand of 35 spaces was observed limited to only one occasion at one site. The peak demand averaged for the three research locations was 31.33 spaces. Therefore, to provide an adequate parking supply, while minimising excessive impervious coverage, the recommended parking for a typical 8,000 S.F. Goddard School is 30 to 35 spaces. Mix\Goddard5ysrcroslSummaryRepoM]Nav IJ.doc TECHNICAL APPENDIX Goddard Systems, Inc. Traffic and Parking Research Study Table 1 The Goddard School 560 Holmdel Road, Hazlet, NJ TIME Enter Exit Total Parked Vehicles 7:00-7:10 6 4 10 10 7:10-7:20 5 7 12 9 7:20-7:30 4 4 8 9 7:30-7:40 3 3 6 7 7:40-7:50 13 4 17 18 7:50-8:00 6 11 17 16 8:00-8:10 11 2 13 21 8:10-8:20 10 12 22 21 8:20-8:30 7 8 15 19 8:30-8:40 9 9 18 20 8:40-8:50 5 8 13 17 8:50-9:00 9 4 13 20 9:00-9:10 6 12 18 21 9:10-9:20 7 4 11 17 9:20-9:30 2 6 8 15 9:30-9:40 0 1 1 14 9:40-9:50 0 0 0 14 9:50-10:00 0 0 0 14 10:00-10:10 2 0 2 16 10:10-10:20 0 2 2 14 10:20-10:30 2 1 3 16 10:30-10:40 0 1 1 15 10:40-10:50 0 0 0 15 10:50-11:00 1 0 1 16 11:00-11:10 1 1 2 17 11:10-11:20 2 2 4 17 11:20-11:30 1 1 2 17 11:30-11:40 1 2 3 17 11:40-11:50 1 0 1 16 11:50-12:00p 4 0 4 20 12:00-12:10 1 4 5 20 12:10-12:20 5 1 6 21 12:20-12:30 8 3 11 26 12:30-12:40 1 8 9 26 12:40-12:50 0 4 4 18 12:50-1:00 4 4 8 19 1:00-1:10 1 7 8 17 1:10-1:20 3 1 4 14 1:20-1:30 1 0 1 14 1:30-1:40 0 0 0 14 1:40-1:50 1 0 1 15 1:50-2:00 3 1 4 18 2:00-2:10 0 4 4 17 Data Collected: April 1, 2003 April 3, 2003 Goddard Systems, Inc. Traffic and Parking Research Study Table 1 The Goddard School 560 Holmdel Road, Hazlet, NJ 2:10-2:20 0 1 1 14 2:20-2:30 1 0 1 15 2:30-2:40 1 3 4 16 2:40-2:50 1 0 1 14 2:50-3:00 4 2 6 17 3:00-3:10 2 2 4 16 3:10-3:20 2 1 3 18 3:20-3:30 1 1 2 17 3:30-3:40 2 1 3 18 3:40-3:50 3 3 6 20 3:50-4:00 2 2 4 18 4:00-4:10 4 4 8 21 4:10-4:20 5 5 10 20 4:204:30 2 4 6 19 4:30-4:40 2 3 5 17 4:404:50 4 2 6 19 4:50-5:00 7 5 12 20 5:00-5:10 10 11 21 21 5:10-5:20 10 7 17 22 5:20-5:30 9 11 20 22 5:30-5:40 9 14 23 20 5:40-5:50 8 5 13 19 5:50-6:00 9 20 29 19 244 253 497 Data Collected: April 1, 2003 April 3, 2003 Goddard Systems, Inc. Traffic and Parking Research Study Table 2 The Goddard School 65 Kent Road, Howell, NJ TIME Enter Exit Total Parked Vehicles 7:00-7:10 5 6 11 11 7:10-7:20 4 4 8 10 7:20-7:30 11 6 17 15 7:30-7:40 11 6 17 15 7:40-7:50 7 5 12 16 7:50-8:00 13 7 20 24 8:00-8:10 3 8 11 26 8:10-8:20 19 6 25 30 8:20-8:30 19 16 35 35 8:30-8:40 5 16 21 35 8:40-8:50 10 7 17 27 8:50-9:00 8 9 17 26 9:00-9:10 10 10 20 25 9:10-9:20 4 8 12 25 9:20-9:30 4 2 6 22 9:30-9:40 2 5 7 21 9:40-9:50 3 4 7 20 9:50-10:00 0 0 0 18 10:00-10:10 0 1 1 17 10:10-10:20 2 0 2 19 10:20-10:30 0 0 0 19 10:30-10:40 0 0 0 19 10:40-10:50 0 0 0 19 10:50-11:00 1 1 2 20 11:00-11:10 1 1 2 20 11:10-11:20 0 1 1 18 11:20-11:30 0 0 0 18 11:30-11:40 0 0 0 18 11:40-11:50 0 0 0 18 11:50-12:00p 1 0 1 19 12:00-12:10 1 1 2 20 12:10-12:20 3 1 4 21 12:20-12:30 8 2 10 27 12:30-12:40 7 10 17 28 12:40-12:50 5 1 6 29 12:50-1:00 6 9 15 30 1:00-1:10 3 5 8 23 1:10-1:20 3 1 4 20 1:20-1:30 1 0 1 21 1:30-1:40 1 3 4 20 1:40-1:50 1 1 2 19 1:50-2:00 2 0 2 21 2:00-2:10 1 3 4 19 Data Collected: March 25 - 26, 2003 Goddard Systems, Inc. Traffic and Parking Research Study Table 2 The Goddard School 65 Kent Road, Howell, NJ 2:10-2:20 0 0 0 19 2:20-2:30 1 2 3 19 2:30-2:40 0 1 1 17 2:40-2:50 1 1 2 17 2:50-3:00 4 1 5 20 3:00-3:10 7 3 10 26 3:10-3:20 1 5 6 22 3:20-3:30 2 5 7 21 3:30-3:40 2 2 4 19 3:40-3:50 3 2 5 20 3:504:00 6 1 7 24 4:00-4:10 3 7 10 25 4:10-4:20 7 5 12 22 4:20-4:30 2 7 9 22 4:30-4:40 3 5 8 17 4:40-4:50 5 4 9 17 4:50-5:00 3 2 5 17 5:00-5:10 4 6 10 17 5:10-5:20 5 6 11 17 5:20-5:30 10 9 19 18 5:30-5:40 11 9 20 17 5:40-5:50 6 5 11 18 5:50-6:00 5 10 15 19 276 264 540 Data Collected: March 25 - 26, 2003 Goddard Systems, Inc. Traffic and Parking Research Study The Goddard School 36 Bey Lea Road, Toms River Time Enter Exit Total Parked Vehicles 7:00-7:10 3 0 3 9 7:10-7:20 4 4 8 9 7:20-7:30 6 5 11 13 7:30-7:40 2 3 5 9 7:40-7:50 7 4 11 15 7:50-8:00 6 6 12 16 8:00-8:10 7 2 9 17 8:10-8:20 9 8 17 18 8:20-8:30 9 5 14 22 8:30-8:40 8 7 15 28 8:40-8:50 20 11 31 32 8:50-9:00 10 15 25 31 9:00-9:10 6 10 16 26 9:10-9:20 0 6 6 20 9:20-9:30 0 0 0 15 9:30-9:40 0 0 0 15 9:40-9:50 2 0 2 17 9:50-10:00 0 2 2 16 10:00-10:10 0 1 1 14 10:10-10:20 2 1 3 16 10:20-10:30 0 1 1 16 10:30-10:40 0 0 0 16 10:40-10:50 2 0 2 16 10:50-11:00 0 0 0 16 11:00-11:10 2 0 2 18 11:10-11:20 2 2 4 19 11:20-11:30 0 1 1 18 11:30-11:40 0 0 0 17 11:40-11:50 1 0 1 18 11:50-12:00p 0 3 3 17 12:00-12:10 3 0 3 18 12:10-12:20 2 3 5 19 12:20-12:30 1 2 3 17 12:30-12:40 0 1 1 15 12:40-12:50 3 1 4 18 12:50-1:00 7 6 13 23 1:00-1:10 4 5 9 21 1:10-1:20 1 5 6 19 1:20-1:30 0 1 1 15 1:30-1:40 1 0 1 16 1:40-1:50 1 0 1 17 1:50-2:00 0 0 0 17 Table 3 Data Collected: April 2, 2003 April 9, 2003 Goddard Systems, Inc. Traffic and Parking Research Study Table 3 The Goddard School 36 Bey Lea Road, Toms River 2:00-2:10 0 0 0 17 2:10-2:20 1 1 2 18 2:20-2:30 0 0 0 17 2:30-2:40 0 0 0 17 2:40-2:50 0 0 0 17 2:50-3:00 3 3 6 19 3:00-3:10 3 4 7 18 3:10-3:20 3 2 5 18 3:20-3:30 3 4 7 18 3:30-3:40 3 2 5 17 3:40-3:50 1 3 4 18 3:504:00 3 4 7 16 4:004:10 7 7 14 15 4:10-4:20 4 8 12 17 4:20-4:30 8 5 13 15 4:30-4:40 5 7 12 12 4:40-4:50 6 5 11 16 4:50-5:00 6 7 13 16 5:00-5:10 6 5 11 12 5:10-5:20 3 5 8 11 5:20-5:30 8 4 12 16 5:30-5:40 3 8 11 15 5:40-5:50 2 9 11 14 5:50-6:00 1 1 2 12 Totals 210 215 425 Data Collected: April 2, 2003 April 9, 2003 ° ss. O, °F� S s0 0i so OS 0". OF y 0j °P) 00. °SF, � 0f . O , F 00, F S20 3 OSS °�2 00 05,i Y F 2 05. Q Z O Y O/ j ? U 00. 2 °SZ / 0 /p Q N , W A F- 02 0 0 F 0 p . 2 W p 00. n N QOF /. 05, ''o a p 0<j ?ii 0 /O O C7 05,0 i D OHO Sp i O . 02. OS6O p 0S' O F 6 6, 6, 00" 05, 6 B 0S 0 F9. 6 v 0i 0 00 —_ O8 2 �0 o s. F � o in o in o in �n o`° o 00 S913IH9A 1V10j LL ss, SS 0 O O/' S So O OSjOg a O/.'0 5 5, 00. OSI, y O S O SI, IF, 0 F I; O� OS O O j' 0. O 2, 00� F p'Si u z O Ij Q Z O Y 2j pi, Q O LL = LL N Og O Q Z O OF. Oj2 F F J ~ 2/ / ~ O O J Oil 2 W p (n O 0- OS'j 0 >. Ojj D O2 o moi, 0 00. ago v i 0 OI,O 3.O/ Z, O,. 19'.O" / OS6000j DI,6 6 0606 00 0..6 O1. jf1 Oi8 Ode cd O19 F3OS =O O OS. CDR ! O/. O o in on o �n o u� - o O ST101HDA IVlOj LL 0 SS. p 01 FS s so °s OFS°j. Ori °2j 00. 0SF` S O FF, I Fo 0 °I` S� O O 5 rr o, 0! , 00c' O U Z i, °!i, ! a fL4 y p O a 0Sc' ! o w 2 / O N L o r21 i °0 N 0 - r, O f�0 ° °>. Fii / Oo. OT. 7- 0 ° 3 i 0!. 0 Oi 0i p 0p. S6 0i 6, 00. 5' 6 FB B $ Or. O� cd g0 pS O9 �F �0 O �' Z5 U) p) O O O Lr) m N N O 00. S3lJIH3A 1V101 >- F F � U Z Q C7 0 Z = Z Q CL O J � O r O W = J U N U) Q o = Q D O O C7 � N N SD-101HIA o3Ndvd j0 NgewnN 0 °FS S o/. °?. s s 0 0. 0 Or 7 y O/. °2. S� S °SF,OS O OFA O/. °2 1;0 F Os2 v. O OF2 S� O/_ ° O O O/. O 0 °S2 � o w °F. °S E F O/. O� /, i O5, °O. O 0> 50 i r, 0.O 5 / O/ O/, O� O O/ O O�O.0 of 6. 6 O/. 6, 6 O °S6 �6 oFg O 0. °�. �0 9 °S og OF °S 0/. °2- Y, °O U- LO w oss 0 oss s 0,. o?. s s pSS �S O 3, O 00 S� 3 O OrS 3� F � O os� 0 0 3r 10 O OSi 0. O °f'j O/. O? Q / 00 Os2 j O W Oj � 2/ 2/ H O/ 02. o °�'i O 3 O/. 2. O 00 S0 i OF. 03 O, O/ O,, 0 O/ O, O OS6, 00/ O 6. 6 6, 6 O O3 Ode e °/' o 9 90 O ��B O1 O 0,. 0- 0 0 ?00 ._ } H F U a �Z z Z Y ck W Q > IL J N O O U O U � N Q O O N O O S3l0IH3A OIAHVd 30 Hgew 1N oss ° O,. 0 s, s ° 0. S3 O OS3 O,. °� M1 5, °S oo s I O OSS y _ O,. 0-. '0 f p O. S� F O OSS 3� O,. 0 . osO 4 p °Oi LL S2 O W °F 2 2/ 2, O °O� S /, / O y 0/- 00- OK ,.°O- Di °F. °3 O, O, D,. O� O, 'O, O OS _ 00 O OS6, j6 O,. °2. 6, 6 0.. �6 '0>. 19 F s, s 10 O� O O,. 0 . ,-,O O w tx W � \� �74 2«®Z, - � / §\ gm !THEGmnq:sHOR< }\aRe � _�FOP ma __m ««_m | q p 11• fd11.Y,1�'1��11"1 b,lln nl.l Y'u •.1 .1 .1 �. lu llu 11/11■ •�•1/1" 111/11■11/ •I 1•�1 �111.1i /11.11/1 Iuau.1�Y • '"Ilu 11 u.I ,Y.•Y linl b...n unnn/•y'jl�i ■ill=•nen■ 1�•••j�j�lnn ..Innen .. u..11uYi.•1 � u... Iu�O Y. Ilu.luY1.Y1. iiiliiiiit'lii,lii ..•I//.1.I1/11/II■ _ - 11/Il/11/•'1. - -dull /, 1. /,: P9.i../1//Il.lnl .IIIPIII� Ji.Y.....1... .....:.� � ...0 1'u�l ....Y = - Ilnl-n.0 �•�. •..•, .....,...r •.... i.Yi �l n/n/ii�'n o�u iini�n�i :••• iu inn i�u�il'Yil- 9 'lii�n i�lu�niiinn: :n �l'li:: i/:i �: i.�ii u .. iu'ii.'iii }in ii'�ii'iii �iiiliniil'n iil■ ��t=�liii il'u iiu iii = = i��u ��u iiu l�iii'iiiiit� linii�u 1. /Iii iiia ails'I 'll n u ili i . n11..Y4�.L••9,.I•1u'. Ilii'. il11 i�i•Iil 1 11l i1ll1l.1i1li•'•..l1/l'l/i1I1 l/l ,%I IIl1i1i•:•1il1i'i• 1in11 l%'n/'1i1'i1l 1/1i 111.1111 i/iiIl•'u�i. j1.i.Ill1i.. 1i'1.I'l1i'...'.. niil .... .1.1 i .Iii .. iiern/11Iii. J • .. l ui1i _ z ... • �i I. .. iii: _..,irt.. t� I.. ••• 9 CD yo M M CD C w 0 0 w A i �y w n 5 H m i f-1 CD C (� O C "C7 O 0 00 00 0 m P t � 1 + 4 a 1 / A sl Ij i f i I m P t � 1 + 4 a 1 / A sl Ij 144 ZT'ArE Hk1r. No, io m I 7"IE. 000%,c Lbt-v*,vt aa. CM PoNa %--Xftss-z N' t--l'w B-11 J- VAIC"fvNb _6/04 Tau lx:a0 rlu r0404ru0rr —TA Tf" 1 III/ff ,.:In11_ rlrrl. ; .Y 1: rYr11 h or W HE—, 1 r/Y d YI. Am rp .r se )J MN ' 0 WESTI I ;r^Y1 1 i"Irl $ STATE HWY. 18TH Arn YV. TL R v� 11� No. 101 a STREET tj , _ - [------------------------- , r -------- -----,rol 41S f I 1 to Ii 11 f 1 1 0 ' I N I'f ✓ I i II S a -/o i t a I' vm.155 SI �r0 ice. Od DOQ , i0101 1 =' r ----A. I , 41S f I I� ' 1 as 1 3 1 I I �r0 Py OsYOY^1 \ �� .um .Prsrs.b..nss.. bnur:u..Ysr_rw �rlrlbrTc«b bibr b DIY r Xlv.l.I.n /v b Icl AC Wf TIwllNoblb b W IM.YrIVI1N Yo/vn. a1.Y.wuMm'v I.bMbM1. O.r...v 61b1b Ib.11b nvuvrt cli9.. b. Y® .u�b«.rbnb .Ybrm YY.tl..b..b YYI«4lw«MY IAP1V.m IrR• AIs011vor m r�`br�'eYiw br�i..bu �s«s r..sP. a+ws.mw�awr.w ®w Blailii�¢er ww `«riiaeee� Y.r• r nw..-YfM411«Pn.wb.�.m.. zm rs..aamrml i«smr.w� •esbmsmr m �MMbIMW.Iv.Y.lr. 0 I«.M � �P r.�wr .e_� m�'iuw snaiw YiMIM WYiIC MIS rpc �.��. �rYunsb..bwwrr.w.Y �.ibn�war'aibisu�oY. wib�a r bw..-wi.w_.a«nww.mbb.r �«.c.l«me bm.w YrYs.b�.wbm«b .um .Prsrs.b..nss.. bnur:u..Ysr_rw �rlrlbrTc«b bibr b DIY r Xlv.l.I.n /v b Icl AC Wf TIwllNoblb b W IM.YrIVI1N Yo/vn. a1.Y.wuMm'v I.bMbM1. O.r...v 61b1b Ib.11b nvuvrt cli9.. b. Y® .u�b«.rbnb .Ybrm YY.tl..b..b YYI«4lw«MY IAP1V.m IrR• AIs011vor m PROJECT SUMMARY GHANHA55EN 6000AIRD 18TH 5TREET t GREAT PLAINS BLVD. LOT I, BLOCK I, CARVER COUNTY GHANHA55EN, MINNE50TA 9000 W. FT. Goddard Scl FOR EARLY CHHM100DJP DIVELC Quality That Last Lifetime• waerm n*eau r�`br�'eYiw br�i..bu �s«s � ®w Blailii�¢er .�ir.a Y.r• PROJECT SUMMARY GHANHA55EN 6000AIRD 18TH 5TREET t GREAT PLAINS BLVD. LOT I, BLOCK I, CARVER COUNTY GHANHA55EN, MINNE50TA 9000 W. FT. Goddard Scl FOR EARLY CHHM100DJP DIVELC Quality That Last Lifetime• waerm n*eau �s«s � ®w Blailii�¢er wP ws.w PROJECT DIRECTORY 11 OF CITY RECEIVED SSEN SEP 0 3 2004 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT o.rvw«rco� ws.w c v.o.a. cart�cn TIME `J@T TI.I TIME `J@T TI.I THE GODDARD 5GHOOL5 FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD VEVELOPMBT UJ CHANHA55EN GODDARD i SfTyR�ffua��AD.pO��S C+OM4A%M MNE50fA ZIP THFORE GODDARD Y SCHOOLS � 6HANHA55EN GODDARD N5 Gf45NV-'6M MNEWTA ZIP ry 4 TFC GODDARD 5GHOOL5 FOR EARLY GHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENTJill 04ANHA55EN GODDARD IT SIf�T I CAQW55EK MWC5 A ZIP '3D FAD ��D A 1 y 1 1 •1 1 (R J THE GODDARD 5GHOOL5 1"I' si 6HANHA55EN GODOARD CAAN ADORES GIKIVSGBI, MNBOfA ZR EZZ 0 A THE GODOARD 5GHOOL5 1"I' > FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD DVAH-O� 1 1 GHHANHA55EN GODDARD 1 CAMN4L56B/, M*EWTA ZIP � . .. .. . . §§ ! r8( U\gig q411811 1 % \ 116-1 FORH�R2��SCHOOLS | fnjilll!l § mAHAkN��mD §§� ^� �f' 4 |& +�!i \ � |� ) ,��.,• |%�] � A Q� 116-1 FORH�R2��SCHOOLS | fnjilll!l § mAHAkN��mD §§� ^� �f' 4 |& I ;9]` 11*m t ; | |;% & a!(�$ | ( � �� U�q rq®�;* :q &� k;;�§1 O lip , : R||| ||| IN \•|� a &| ) §kR||MA§! §%|D§/ | . I.! j-11 - ;9]` 11*m t ; | |;% & a!(�$ | ( � �� U�q rq®�;* :q &� k;;�§1 O lip , : R||| ||| IN \•|� a &| //R��EL�NT 11 2 | 2 mAHA»Nmmgo �� «A —I ) §kR||MA§! §%|D§/ | | ,|«#m� j-11 - //R��EL�NT 11 2 | 2 mAHA»Nmmgo �� «A —I - R:. //R��EL�NT 11 2 | 2 mAHA»Nmmgo �� «A —I i ti R¢grya a $ $� orgsQ °a $8t !, tl f Atga°'� 5 it3`- SAMR z qta jEt s 8�e■-� :t ' E' tsa �' 4�� g qE�s 3 a q a 9$ E ! gy ggg#pg 33 R a�g;t vgc3E aY2'Sditt'yR t lA°� nt +fidsE"3 1°'settaeasa;eQ6$ ii(gdtirp ,its �o �d7 alE9 e° •3d 'Rc„3giFe€!4 33y5 gt iq 'Lft a� THE GODDARD SCHOOLS 1 i'st1 i -p o? FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT t s t .�j9 �t CHANHASSEN GODDARD GRE4 AT PLTr'551�1 VVMo a 787N STREET t t t i a a ail s.� } -3 is aaaaaa9aa� 33933339E ?}f+c �• ra a �de;-� 04 a 3 g f Egg§;€ n 4p N! U1. a f 5 e5 #�if x L fpfiiQ a p :�E § • £ �3a� !E� S +�� i t v THE GDDARD SCHOOLS IFOR EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT I fa p$ L 1 i !I � CHANHASSEN GODDARD a t GRIAaa«SK u!Miceorsxo a 7Wsmm Iv1 N Y M H o u ee H 10 1i1 u u n u w N Y Y Y Y Y b n 1 -cm THE GODDARD SCHOOLS mp I FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT I 'CHANHASSEN GODDARDasci ParisBMUVwm t 787Hsm[[TWKSDTA �Fa 1 gr FF F rr 1i1 u u n u w N Y Y Y Y Y b n 1 -cm THE GODDARD SCHOOLS mp I FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT I 'CHANHASSEN GODDARDasci ParisBMUVwm t 787Hsm[[TWKSDTA I r (l1'rl' T I lip s THE GODDARD THE 1 "11,1111 .ilii I o FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT m IN :fps f 0 f t. CHANHASSEN GODDARDfill GREAT T5 W WBUVAR k 787H STREET i m Pa i N L Il \ £ 3 c� A D 'l f 4�? I r (l1'rl' T I lip s THE GODDARD THE 1 "11,1111 .ilii I o FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT m IN :fps f 0 f t. CHANHASSEN GODDARDfill GREAT T5 W WBUVAR k 787H STREET i m / a � � , [ 7 , : ) 4 ± ( � » !§ }• �q 11 11 i THE mmgo SCHOOLS •I m�'»EARLY a»»�_m c�`^�GREAl /l\j EVARD . � , it'll" §}� WANHASSEMNW ,i !§ }• � 11 11 i THE mmgo SCHOOLS •I m�'»EARLY a»»�_m c�`^�GREAl /l\j EVARD . � , it'll" §}� WANHASSEMNW ,i ;! | � � � SCHOOLS oms |p W , FOR _._mm�»_, % \ / | §\(I �/�ss�78��D _ ___,aEmmUD! 4 |